ZE-023-95
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMII'dER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS +UF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDEIZ
IIr1TRflDUCTIUN
This matter has come before the Hearing Exan-uner Committee on July 20 1995
The members of the Comrruttee present are Frank Yuse, Chair Verona Southern
and Toni Nersesian
PROPOSAL
The sponsor Bi11 Lawson requests approval of a Zone Reclassification ZE 23-95
from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Regional Business (B 3) for a 200 unit
motel retail sales offices and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B 3)
zone
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1 The pioperty is generally located north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue
approxunately 300 feet east of Pines Road in the NW 1f4 of Section 10 Township
25 North Range 44 EWM Spokane County, Washzngton
2 The Corruruttee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of thls record
3 The exlsting Iand uses in the area include retail sales professionaUmedical offices
nursing homes Valley General Hospital and single fanuly residential
4 The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area
5 The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban The Urban category i5
primarily a residential designation consisting of a wide variety of housing types and
densrties in a city like envu-onment served by public facilities and services The
more intensive uses such as light industrial commercial and neighborhood
commereial will be lacated near heavily traveled streets and serve as a transition
between single farruly residential and more Intensive uses Due tQ the vanety and
nux of land uses and activities found in the Urban category there are few land use
activities that would be inappropnate The subject property adjoins the Major
Commercial category to the west I-94 ta the north and the transition policy of the
Cvmprehensive Plan may be applicable Transition areas are deflned as the fringe
areas between two or more Comprehensive Plan land use categories This is an
area which can allow developments complyiag with either land use category The
proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential 3 5(UR 3 5) to Regional
Business (B 3) is generally not consistent with the Goals Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Urban category but can be consistent when considering the
transition poliey of the Comprehensive Plan
6 The proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan
7 The Spol.ane County Aiterial Road Plan designates Mission Avenue as a Minoi
Artenal with a future i ight of way width of 80 feet To implement the Arterial Road
Plan the County Engineer has requested in addition to the required right of way
dedication of 2 feet that a strip of property 8 feet in width along the Mission
Avenue frontage be set aside as a Future Acquisition Area
8 The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban
Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) previously established as Agncultural (A) zoning in 1942
and redesignated to Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) on January 1 1991 pursuant
to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code The proposal does
conform to the requirements of the proposed Regional Business (B 3) zone
9 The provisions of RCW 43 21 C(The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Deterrrunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued The
Commlttee after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS
10 The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled
11 The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the
proposed use
12 The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the
original zoning of this area and accordingly the proposed zone reclassification is
justified Specifically changed conditions include adoption of the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan and approval of other land use actions in the project vicinity
13 The proposed use will not be detiimental to the public health, safety morals or
welfare especially in light of the conditlons recommended by the reviewing
agencies
14 The Committee additionally finds/concludes
a The traffic impacts generated by the proposal are adequately rrutigated by the
recommended conditions of approval and the rrutigation agreement agieed to
by the applicant and the Washington State Department of Transportation
b The revised site plan of record subrrutted to the Hearing Examiner Comnuttee
on July 20 1995 provides a transition deslgn to rrutigate potential impacts
on the adjacent properties
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1 All Condltions imposed by the Heanng Examiner Committee shall be binding on
the Applicant which term shall include the owner or owners of the property
heirs assigns and successors-in-interest
2 The Zone Reclassification and following Conditions of Approval apply to the real
property described below
All that portion of Tiacts 21, 22 and 23 Assessoi s Plat No 6 as iecoided in Volume
P of Plats Page 14 descc ibed as follows
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 2
Begin at the SE cornei of said Tract 22 thence north 89°53 16 west along the south
line of said Tract 21 and 22 416 67 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station
M 12+96 and 30 0 feet northerly thereof thence north 84°14 38 west along a line if
projected would end at a point opposite Highway Engineers Station M 11+86 and 410
feet northerly thereof 6 09 feet, thence on a bearing of north 246 32 feet to the
intersection of a line drawn from a point opposite Highway Engineers Station S 6+04
on the S line survey of State Highway Route 90 Spokane to Greenacres, approved
Apn121 1953 and 67 0 feet easterly thereof to a point opposite Highway Engineers
Station NE 3+55 5 and 75 0 feet southeasterly thereof when measured radially from the
NE center line of said State Highway Route 90, Spokane to Greenacres, thence N
89°37 11 east, along said line 23 02 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers
Station NE 3+55 5 and 75 0 feet southeasterly thereof when measured radially from the
NE center line said point being on a curve concave to the northwest with a radius of
791 30 feet and a radial bearing of S 12°07 06 E thence southwesterly through a
central angle of 00°58 10 an arc distance of 13 39 feet to the intersection with the
north line of the south 244 4 feet of said Tract 21, thence S 89°53 16 E along said
north line, 56 48 feet to the west line of said Tract 22 thence N 00°00 16 E along
sald west line 13 41 feet to a point on a curve concave to the northwest with a radius
of 791 30 feet and a radial bearing of S 15°2104 E said point being opposite
Highway Engineers Station NE 3+95 92 and 75 0 feet southeasterly thereof thence
❑ortheasterly, through a central angle of 5°56 59 an arc distance of 82 17 feet to a
point opposite Highway Engineers Station NE 4+70 3 and 75 0 feet southeasterly
thereof thence N 37°36 17 E 119 82 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers
Statlon NE 5+70 4 and 20 3 feet southeasterly thereof thence N 59°OS 58 E 100 02
feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station NE 6+67 4 and 24 3 feet
southeasterly thereof thence N 47°52 36 E 166 47 feet to a point opposite Highway
Engineers Station NE P C 8+30 8 and 25 0 feet southeasterly thereof thence S
44°3100 E at right angles to said NE Line center line of said highway 50 00 feet to a
point opposite Highway Engineers Station NE P C 8+30 8 and 75 0 feet southeasterly
thereof thence S 45°29 00 W parallel with said center line 54 73 feet to the east line
of said Tract 22 thence S 00°00 32 W along said east line 468 26 feet to the point of
beginning Situate in the County of Spokane State of Washington
HEARING EXAMINER COIVIIVIITT'EE
1 Site development shall be subject to compliance with the following conditions as
specified in the traffic rrutigation agreement entered into by the applicant and the
Wastungton State Department of Transportation, subnutted to the Hearing Exarrunei
Committee on July 20 1995 as Exhibit B
a Owners will dedicate a six foot strip of right of way along the western portion
of their parcel whlch parcel is already zoned Community Business (B-2) and
not actually a part of this zone change proposal The length of the six foot
right of way strip will be approxlmately 175 38 feet and will not involve the
northern jog at the northwest corner of such parcel as that right of way has
already been acquired by WSDOT or some other governmental agency nor
does it involve the radius of the curve at the southwest corner of such parcel
as that right of way has also been acquired by WSDOT or some other
governmental agency
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 3
~
b Owners will dedicate additional right of way along the entire southern
frontage of their parcel to provide the County of Spokane with totai nght of
way from centerline of Mission Avenue to the southern boundary of Owners
parcel of 40 feet
c Owners shall pave an addiuonal lane on Mission tapering in from the
southeast corner of their parcel and eventually blending into the existing nght
turn lane at the southwest portion of their parcel The pavement shall be
according to Counry specifications and shall include curb gutter and
sidewalk Owners shall not be required to install a nght turn traffic signal or
other traffic signalization at the Pines and Mission intersection
d Owners shall pay the sum of $43,600 in cash to WSDOT at such tune as a
building pernut is obtained to construct any one of the improvements on the
parcel for wluch the zone change is requested but in no event later than 12
months from the date of the approval of zone change from Urban Residential-3 S
(UR-3 5) to Regional Business (B-3) for the subject parcel
e WSDOT shall be entitled to utiLze the $43 600 for improvements to the Pines
and Mission intersection including but not lirruted to implementation of
addltional lanes signalization widening of the intersection or any other
improvements deemed appropriate by WSDOT or at the sole discretion of
WSDOT for the freeway ramp improvements scheduled for the I-90/Pines
interchange involving either the east bound off-ramps or the west bound on-
ramps or any combination of these projects
f In any event, proponents expressly waive any nght wluch they may have to
reimbursement of the funds contributed to WSDOT pursuant to RCW 82 02 020
or any other statutory or common law authoi ity of the State of Waslungton
2 The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning Condition No 2 is amended
to read as follows
The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the site
plan presented to the Hearing Body on July 20 1995 Variations when approved by
the Planrung Director/designee may be pernutted including but not linuted to
building location landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone
All vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be ma.tntained
3 Spokane County Division of Engineering Condition No 14 is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following
The applicant shall construct a 14 nght turn lane on 1Vlission Avenue This
improvement shall begin where the existing right turn terminates and continues east
along the entire frontage of the development Dedication of applicable nght of way
to facihtate the right turn lane along Mission Avenue shall be complied with
Additionally curb and gutter shall be constructed A sidewalk is also requued but
this improvement may be in a border easement as opposed to dedication
Provided that the dedication of right of way equals at least 40 feet from centerhne of
Mlssion Avenue County Engineering Condition No 1 and 12 shall be invalid
Thls condition reflects the voluntary agreement between WSDOT and the applicant
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 4
~
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ]BUII.DING ANI) PI.AI\1NING
1 The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone as amended
2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body Vanations, when approved by the
Planning Duector/designee, may be pernutted, including but not lirYUted to building
location landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All
vanations must conform to regulations set forth ln the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained IVote
This condition ainended per Hearing Examiner Coananittee Conditaon
No 2
3 Approval is requued by the Building and Planrung Director/designee of a specific
lighting and sigrung plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any
building pernuts
4 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Buildulg and Planning Duector/designee shall be subrrutted with a
performance bond for the project pnor to release of building permits Landscaping
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not
obscured or impaired
5 Duect light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
6 The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record
with the County Auditor a Title Notlce specifying a future land acquisition area for
road nght-of-way and utilities The reserved future acquisitlon area Title Notice
sha11 be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The
notice should be recorded witlun the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide
the following
a At least 8 feet of reserved future acquisitlon area foi road right-of-way and
utilities in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along
IVhssion Avenue NOTE The County Engineer has required 2 feet of new
dedication
b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning
Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area
c No required landscaping, parlang 208' areas drainfield or allowed signs
should be located within the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and
utilities If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they
shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are
made
d The future acquisition area until acquired, shall be private property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping parking surface drainage drainfield signs or others) shall be
considered interim uses
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 5
e The property owner shall be responsiblc for ielocating such intenm
improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements
after acquinng said future acquisition area
7 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a
vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action
Tlus Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting
the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded wittun the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Division of Building and Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as
follows
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on [ ] imposing a variety of
special development conditions File No [ ] is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County I)ivision of Building
and Planning
S The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requirements adrrunisteredlenforced as authorized by the
State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressing fire
apparatus access roads fire hydrant/flow approved water systems building
accessibility, construction type occupancy classification exiting exterior wall
protection and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Buildings reserves the
nght to confirm the actual address at the time of building perrrut )
SPOKANE COUNTY I)IVISION OF ENGINEERING AND itOAi)S
Pnor to issuance of a building oernut or at the reQuest of the Countv Eneineer in conaunction
with a Countv Road Proiect/Road Improvement District, whichever action comes first
1 Applicant shall dedicate 2 feet on Mission Avenue for right-of way and slope
easements as necessary
2 The applicant shall dedicate the applicable radius on Mission Avenue and Plnes
Road
Prior to issuance of a buildine oermit or use of the prooertv as nronosed
3 Access pernuts for approaches to the counry road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer
4 Access periruts and improvements to Pines Road must be approved by the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
5 The applicant shall submlt for approval by the Spokane County Englneer road
drainage and access plans
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 6
6 A parking plan and traffic circulation pIan shall be submitted and agpraved by the
Spokane County Engrneer The design location and arrangement of parking stalls
shail be in accordance with standard traffic engineenng practices Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of
the proaect wtuch is ta be occupied or traveled by vehicles
7 The canstructian of the road improvements stated herem shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
8 All requued improvements shall conforzn to the current State of VVashington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction and other applicable
County standards andior adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management rn effect at the date of construction unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer
9 Ttoadway standards, typical raadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
faund in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592 as
amended and are apphcable to tYus proposal
10 No construction work shall be performed wrthin the existzng or prvposed public
nght-of-way untzl a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer AIl work
within the public road rlght-af-way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer
11 All required constructaon withln the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to
be completed pnor to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount
estimated by the County Engineer ta cover the cost of construction of unprovements
shall be filed wrth the Caunty Engineer
12 The Cvunty Artenal Road Plan zdentifies Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial The
existing nght of-way width af 60 feet is not consistent wrth that specified in the
Plan In order to implement the A.rterial Road Pian in addition to the requued
right-of-way dedication a stnp of property S feet in width along the IVlisslon
Avenue frontage shall be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to 1Vlission
Avenue
13 There may exist utilities erther underground or overhead affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aslde for future acquisltion
Spokane County assumes no financial obligauon for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utslities Applicant(s) should check with the apphcable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determ.ine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment vr relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work
14 Should improvements be required by the Department of Transportation for Pines
Road some additlonal improvements may be required for Misszon Avenue Note
This condition amended per Hearing Examiner Cvmmittee CondYtron
No 3
HEC Order for ZE 23-95 Page 7
~
SPOY{ANE COiTNTY DIVISION OF iJTILITYES
1 A Covenant shall be signed stating The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest a,gree
to authorize the County to place theu name(s) on a petition for the formation of a
ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which petition includes the
4wner(s) property, and further not to object by sigrung of a protest petition against
the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94
wluch includes the Owner(s)' property PROVIDED this condition shall not
prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result of unprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of
a ULID by either petition or resolntion method under RCW Chapter 36 94
2 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be
constructed Sewer connection permlt is required
3 Applicant is reyuvred to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement pnor to issuance of pernut
to connect
4 Apphcant shall subrrut expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department under
separate cover„, only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for
Public Sewer connections for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to
issuance of pernrut to connect
5 Secunry shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construcuon of publlc
facilrties
6 Arrangements for payments of additional sewer charges must be made for pnor to
issuance of sewer connection pernut
? Any water service for tlus project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County as amended
SPOKANE COIJNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
3 Water service shall be by an existing pubhc water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system will be made avwlable for the plat/project and individual
service will be provided to each lot Use of individual on-site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authorized
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems ts prohibited
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 9
v
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR P'OLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORI'TY
1 All air pollution regulations must be met
2 Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition construction
and excavation projects be controlled This may require the use of water sprays tarps
spnnklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions Haul road
should be treated and elrussions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled
as well as errussions from all other construction related activities
3 SCAPCA strongly recommends that a11 traveled surfaces (i e ingress egress parking
areas access roads) be paved and kept clean to mirumize dust errussions
4 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces
5 Debris generated as a resulC of ttvs project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i e construction waste etc )
6 Demolition and renovation projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40 Part
61 Subpart M the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAPS) and SCAPCA Regulation I Article IX which address asbestos abatement
issues Intent to Demolish forms are ava.ilable at the SCAPCA office
7 Some objectionable odors will likely result from this project SCAPCA s regulations
state that effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a
minimum
8 Any project that makes changes to the regional transportation network may be required
to conform to the Waslungton State implementation Plan and be further required to
demonstrate conformance prior to development
WASHINGTON STATE DEP'ARTIVIENT OF TRANSP4RTATION
1 See Hearing Examtner Committee Condition No 1
HEC Order for ZE-23-95 Page 9
(
f ~
_ ri►'►. . -.;•,~:~~tS P O K A N E O U N T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUQQARD, D1REC'TOI2
RECEIVED.
MpY 1995
MEMORANDUM coM EugipeP.r4
TO Pat Harper, Division of Engineering
Greg Figg, WA State Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
FROM John Pederson, Senior Planner ~
DATE May 30, 1995
SUBJECT Ttu-eshold Traffic Analysis for Proposed Hotel/Office Complex at
Pines Road and Mission Avenue
As a follow-up to a Spokane County Planning Department design review meeting on April
12, 1995 regarding a proposed zone reclassification at the northeast corner of Pines Road
and Mission Avenue, the applicant submitted the above-referenced threshold traffic analysis
on May 26, 1995. Prior to accepting the zone reclassif'ication application and prior to
making a threshold SEPA deternunation, the Spokane County Planning Department, as
lea.d agency, requests your review of the traffic analysis. Your review comments should be
in the form of specif'ic conditions, detailed mitigating measures, or indicate the need for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Please forward your comments by June 12, 1995. If you have any questions, please
contact me at 456-2205.
~
I
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVL•TIUE • SPOKANG, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 • FAX: (509) 456-2243 • TDD: (509) 324-3166
_ i
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC
May 25, 1995
W O No 95574
Pat Harper
County Engu►eers
W 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Threshold Traffic Study for Lawson Hotel & Office Building at Mission & Pines
Dear Pat
Based upon our project understanding through conversations with you, Greg Figg at WSDOT
and the sponsor, we have prepared a bnef traffic threshold determination for this project to
deterrlune if there is a need for a full traffic impact analysis
THRESHOLD DETERIVIINATION
1 INT ROD UC170N
The proposed project consists of a 200 room hotel and a 20,000 square foot spec office budding
This hotel and office budding lies on the north side of Niission Avenue just east of Pines Road
(SR 27), see the vicinity map which is attached The site is presently in use as part of a church
complex for a Seventh Day Adventist congregation The parcel of land which has the sanctuary
on it is zoned B-2 The parcel which has the school and other related faclhtles on it is presently
zoned UR-3 5 The B-2 site is not a part of this traffic study It is IVIr Lawson's intent to sell
the B-2 parcel in it's present condition to a third party This threshold traffic study is only being
performed for the UR-3 5 site, as part of the requuements to have it rezoned to B-3 The layout
of the proposed hotel and office buil.ding for this site is shown on the site map wluch is also
attached
Through scoping discussions with both you and Greg Figg, the intersections of Pines & 1Viission
and Pines & the eastbound I-90 ramp terminals will be the focus of this threshold study
707 West 7th o Suite 200
Spokane Washington 49204
509 458 6840
FAX 509 458 6844
Lawson Hotel & Office Building Threshold Study
May 25, 1995
Page 2
11 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Pmes Road is the only street which wnll be analyzed for this project Impacts from the Lawson
hotel and office buddutg, if any, will be analyzed at the following intersections as agreed on in
scopi.ng by Spokane County and WSDOT
• Pines Road & the eastbound I-90 ramp terminals
• Pines Road & 1Viission Ave
Pines Road (SR 27) is' a five lane north-south state lughway and county pruncipal artenal Pines
Road cames about 27,500 velucles per day between Mission and the eastbound I-90 ramp
terminals The speed hmit on Pmes Road is 35 mph at 1Vlission Avenue Traffic uses Pmes
Road for intra- and inter-area tnps through the Spokane valley, east of the City of Spokane since
it connects both I-90 and Trent Avenue (SR 290) with southeastern Spokane County and
Whitman County
Mission Avenue is an east-west two lane minor artenal between Argonne & Sullivan It is
posted at 35 mph for the majonty of it's length and widens out as necessary at the major artenal
crossing points Between McDonald Road and Pines Road, and along the frontage of the
Lawson hotel and office site, Mission Avenue is two lanes in each duection It serves as the
pnmary access to the Valley hospital and those residential properties north of Broadway between
Pmes and Sullivan
III EXISTING C0IVDI7ION - Levels of Service (per HeM)
Traffic counts were taken at Pmes Road & the ea.stbound I-90 ramp terminals, dunng Apnl,
1995 and at Pines Road & Mission in May, 1995 The charactenstics of the existuig traffic for
the AM and PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) are approximately equal, therefore both peak
hours were examined for this report
A summary of the exishxig levels of service at the subject intersections as calculated using the
1994 Highway Capacity Software is shown ui the following table The traffic volumes used for
this report are shown on the "Existing Conditions" figures wtuch are attached
Lawson Hotel & Office Building Threshold Study
May 25, 1995
Page 3
Table 1- Existing Level of Secvice
_ : . ,
, :
. . ' EXISTING
.
. SIGNALIZED :
AM
INTERSECTION .
. : DELAY LOS DELAY
LO&
. ;
Pines Road & Mission Ave. 25.8 D 26.6 D
Pines Road & EB I-90 Ramps 14.9 B 21.9 C
The level of service at both intersections are within acceptable limits. At the intersection of
Pines Road & Mission Avenue, the critical movements are the southbound left turn and the
westbound right turn. The intersection of Pines Road and the eastbound I-90 ramps may be
affected to varying degrees due to it's coordination with the neighboring intersections.
IV. BACKGROUND PROJECTS & 7RAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
For this proposal, one project was identified for inclusion as a background project. This was
the retaiUoffice complex (currently under construction) proposed by Jamie Wolfe on the
northwest corner of Pines & Mission. A second project, the R.A. Hanson mall was discussed,
however, as neither phase one or build out of this project will be on line in 1996, the horizon
year of this study, it was not included.
The Wolfe retail/office complex has the following trip generation and distribution characteristics.
Table 2- Trip Generation - Wolfe Strip Mall
> : . . . _
. :
< AM Peak Hour . . . PM peak Hour <
, . :
,
;
1,000 sq. V01:0' ; Directional YoI Directional
. :
f~. 4.19 trips ' Distribution 15.14 . Distribution
per ].,ODU : trips per
63% In 37% Out - 50% In 50% Out
s4. ft. - 1,~00 sq,
;
. . . ft.
- ,
9 38 24 14 136 68 68
,
: Average Daily Trip Ends (AD1) . . _
15000 sq. . Rate : Totat ADT ft,
9 167.59 1$08
Lawson Hotel & Office Building Threshold Study
May 25, 1995
Page 4
Table 3- Trip Generation - Wolfe Office Space
: .
: . _
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
1'000 Sq. Vol ~ 2.6 ; Directional Vol D~rect~~onal
ft. ~
trips per > Distribution - 2.68 trips :Distributiou
1,000 sq. _ per 1,000 : .
_ ft. $9°o;In , 11% Out sq. ft. 17% In 83°Io: 0ut
~ 24 + 62 ' 56 ~ 7 64 11 53
II I
<
' Averagc DaiIy Trip Ends (ADT)
1,000 s .
q R.ate Total ADT
_ ft.
24 ~ 19.72 473
Table 4- Trip Generation - Wolfe Restaurant
;
; A1V~ ~'eak Hour .
PM Peak Hour
.
1,400 sq. _
Vol Directional ' Vol (g~ Directional
14,81 trips Distribution 12.92 Distribution
Per 1,000 _ trips per
sq. ft. 51% hi 49% Out 1,000 sq. 56% In 44% Out
. . >
5.5 ~ 84 42 ~ 40 71 40 31
Average Dail '~y rip Ends : (ADT)
. . _ '
11000 sq, Rate Tota1 ADT
, .
5.5 177.87 978
In discussions with Jamie Wolfe, the following land uses were identified. The western-most
building on the site is a 9,000 sq. ft. building on each of two floors. The top ground-level floor
will be retail, modelled using the Shopping Center (#820) land use category in the ITE Trip
Generation Manual, Sth Edition (TGM). The bottom floor will have 6,000 sq. ft. of leasable
~
_ ~
Lawson Hotel & Office Building Threshold Study
May 25, 1995
Page 5
area for office space, and 3,000 sq. ft. of storage area. The office space was modelled using
the General Office Building (#710) land use category. The storage area is not expected to
generate any trips.
Along his northern perimeter, a three floor, 6,0()0 sq. ft. per floor office complex has been
approved. This was also modelled using the General Office Building (#710) land use category.
At the northwest corner of Mission and Pines and the southeast corner of the site, a restaurant
is proposed. This restaurant was modelled as a High-T.irnover (Sit Down) Restaurant; land use
category #832.
Ninety-five percent of the traffic from these uses was expected to pass through the intersection
of Pines & Mission. From this intersection, the traffic was expected to distribute itself similarly
to what the present distribution of traffic is depending upon the peak hour encountered.
Non site specific traffic growth was anticipated to be 3% per year over the next year above the
amount generated by the Wolfe office/retail complex.
V. TRIP GENERATION
The Trip Generation Manual, Sth Edition by the Institute of Transportation Engineers has land
use category 710, General Office Building and land use category 312, Business Hotel which
accurately model the proposed land uses of the Lawson site. The trip generation characteristics
of these uses is shown on the following tables.
Table 5- Trip Genecation - Busine.ss Hotel
. . .
.
PiMk Hour PM Peak Hour
No. of
,
.
occupied , ~ol :U;S$ `D~r~c~.ional Voi Directionai
Ytooms trips; per ; !~istribution 0.62 trips ~ Distribution
;
occupied per
5g% ~ 41~o Out . . 60% ~n: ~ ~o~Q out
; roo~a occupied
,
. room
, : > . . . , .
200 116 68 48 124 74 50
Average Daily: T'rip Enc~ ~AD7'~ ; .
:
~te ta~ ~T . ; _
Roon~s '~~o
> :
200 7.67 11534
,
Lawson Hotel & Office Btiilding Threshold Sttidv
May 25, 199',
Page t)
Table 6- Trip Generation - General OfCce Buildin(i - ~"Okc
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
1'000 $q.
Vol (g~ 2.8 Directional ; Vol Directional
~
ft. trips per Distribution 2,92 trips Distribution '
1 000 s .
~ 9 per 1,000
89% In 11% Out 17°lo In - 83% Out
ft _ sq. ft.
. •
20 56 50 6 58 10 48
: .
. Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) : < ,
1,000 sq. Rate Total ADT <
ft. :
20 19.72 394 _
VI. TRIP DISTRIBUTION (simplified gravity model)
For this analysis, it was assumed that the traffic generated by the Lawson hotel/office complex
would ingress and egress from the site approximately 5% to/from the east and 95 % to/from the
west during both the AM and PM peak hours.
VII. FUTURE CONDITION withAvithout PROJECT - Level of Service
The Lawson hotel/office site is expected to be completed within one year. Therefore, the
background traffic was compounded at the 3% growth rate as explained previously in this report.
Traffic from the Wolfe retailloffice site was added to the transportation system prior to the
traffic from the Lawson hotel/office site and is considered existing traffic.
The levels of service expected for these intersections with the increases expected over the next
year are shown on the following table. Note that the levels of service at both intersections
remain within acceptable limits.
- J
Lawson Hotel & Office I3uildino Tllreshold Stud},
May 25, 1995
Page 7
Table 7- 1996 Level of Serr ice Wif fioiii the Lawsou i►otel/office sitc
. . . . BUI~ OUT YEAR BACKGROUND 'TRAFFIC
_ .
,
> : .
AM : PM
_ SIGNAl',IZED
INTERSECTION
DELAY LOS DELAY
IAS
Pines Road & Mission Ave. 28.4 D 32.9 D
Pines Road & EB I-90 Ramps 15.8 C 26.0 D
The traffic volumes on which these level of service calculations are based are attached to this
report.
The traffic anticipated from the Lawson hotel/office site was added to the anticipated 1996
traffic, and the following table shows the anticipated levels of service for that situation.
Table 8- 1996 Level of Service - with the Lawson hoteUoffice site
<;::::.::::,...:;:::<;:;:;::.>::::>;
:
>
tUILD O~UT Y`EAR fiRAMG WTTH
. .
: :
, .
PROJECT _
,
{
SIGNAi,LZED :
.
. , ; . PM : .
~ INTERSECTION AM
<
. DELAY IAS DELAY LOS
Pines Road & Mission Ave. 31.0 D 38.1 D
Pines Road & EB I-90 Ramps 16.2 C 29.2 D
Note that both intersections continue to function at acceptable levels of service with the addition
of both the Wolfe retail/office site and the Lawson hotel/office site.
VIII. CONCL USIONS
From the data collected for this threshold determination, we conclude that the development of
the Lawson hotel/office site will not significantly impact either of the intersections analyzed.
The intersection of Mission & Pines will continue to function at it's present LOS of D, and the
intersection of Pines and the eastbound I-90 ramp terminals, although they will fall one level of
service during both the AM and PM peak hours, will continue to function at acceptable levels
of service which by Spokane County standards are LOS D or better for signalized intersections.
,
Lawson Hotel & Office Building Threshold Study
May 25, 1995 Page 8
IX. PROPOSED MITIGATION
Based upon the traffic counts ta.ken, the calculations performed and the analysis provided, this
development of the Lawson property does not have any identifiable impacts to the intersections
analyzed therefore no mitigation is required or recommended. I
Should you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to call at 458-6840.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
Ann L. Winkler, P.E.
encl.
cc: Greg Figg, WSDOT
John Pederson, County Planning ~
Bill Lawson, A& A Construction
Jamie Wolfe
- • ' \
~ d a in
°C m IAantlkld
oc
PROJECT A
o >
Av.. ~~l.jAv.. ,MonlQ«W~ ~ Sh. L~ N ~
I
~ N
I aIEwln Ar ;
on Ave. Vatley Nott Aw. ~
~ ¢ Q
usta Avq,~ Mlssion 3 1 - o ~
Patic ~ _ ~ ~ IAisslon Av~.
tlssbn Aw. • ~
3 Yarwell Ave. I irw~lf ,d 1Aas~e11 Ave ~~l
All
Av~ I~Aa~nA Aw. $~1 Ave. ¢ SIi lo Aw.
Stnlo Aw. ~1~►lo A~. SI lo Av~. ~i
Sha~Aw. ~ ac
~ Q > BOOM Avo. ¢ ~ af AYo. N ~D
~ 8oor+e A. r Booee Ave- d Boone A'v .&°C ¢ d
¢
.s Desmel.Avt. ac
«
: Oetmtl r m' cr° ~ E Oesmel Aw. DesmN Avt. ` I ~ c Oesmwl Ave. ~e
~ O~~n~ P 5 0 ~ ~ y Gteldd Ave. a ~ Gtdd ~/E E 3~ f I~~d9 v
~ •Ido Aw_ ~ oc ~ d 4lallon CL +W o oJ►ve. t s
Catabo Av~. L~Ilon Ave ~
~ IAapon Av~. ~i`i M~ ~ € Q m Alatlon ve. ~
~
I w d ' 4 c 8toadwa4Ave. tvs
8radw~r Avp. ,
¢ ~ n M a°c ~5p~1n~fleld Ave. ~ ¢ S r1n tl
S tkl
d Ave. C~ ~ 9 Afkl Ave. t v Alki Avt. Atkl Avo. ~ Alk AveAI1c1 Ave. atw Aw. E
j
-0Ilw Ave , y 01(ve A . cc vaIb
•
I> m
VaIk~IN m YaM °C
Ni n
NIti ~
~ Nlton °C ¢ ~ Nl:on Q
ac
Av
2 Wln Aw. I~lal Av . lilal blal Aw. ~ E ~ c
~ ~ c o ~l 1 Ayt, $
~ i v~nide Aw_ ~ AAaln Av~. I~ n_ Id7yAv~. ~ 16
I> isl Aw. c avKtl• 9 Ave. ~ F g R1vKd *Ave.
f m q ~ ~
~ ~ ~v RlvKSid~ v ~ ~ ~
~
ac 1 tt Avc?
a ROSt 191A s ~ a
/ 2nA Ave. cc L 2nd Ave.
ci C 2ndAv°~s' 2~nc
I "°C rdAv 91fICe- I 3rEAw. '0
3rd Ave. I ]rd Ave. ~rd Av~. ~ ~ ~ L#I -
ZC ~ d Zrc
4th Aw. ¢ cr 4th Ave.
~ ¢ ¢ ~ Sth Ave. Sth Av0. ~ StF Av Z ~ A ~ Slh Av~. F I~ ° 6th Aw. o ac 61 Av~. 6lA Av~. Sth CI Ih Ave. m 61h Avs. C. y l 7!h Ave.
-0 ° Y t Ava. ~ o Iih Ave. 97 ve. s lh Ar~. c
°c 0 8th . cS Z'i
s S 1 v•
Sth Art. ~ ac
4th Aw. ac tA Ave P~ ¢ 9thAve.~ c ~ 9th~4ve. ~ 9 Ave. ~ Oth Aw
I o v d d cY > ~ 101~Ave. .c ~ ~ ~ T101h kw. ~ F.,
hAvt
Oi
' ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ -+1 Aw. ltlhA.
~ itth Avt. C A
I21A Aw. s = 1214Ave. ¢ ~ Z 3 oa m 12t Ara.~
~"e. ~l~ oc ~ zY c~
- ~ v v., t3t Ave. g 13IA Ave. , o tslh Aw. 1,:Ih A. th Av~. 1 h ~
A v t. 41 h A w. ~ w¢ 14t A v t. "1 Av . ~ 14t h A v e. , 1 4 1 A v e. ,
~ J. - 15Ih Aw. W t 1/lh Ave.
~ilh Ave.
Avt. ~ t Sth Ave. c~ ,L ~ t Sth v
1511 Aw. iSth Ave. 1 Sth Aw.
/,re. a°c ~ 16Ih Ave. 16th Ave. t
. -T - - • - . r--t- . . -ti
I ~
I
i
NOT TO SCALE
NLAND FlGURE 1
PACIFIC uAwsON SDA TRn~'iC
ENQINEERINCi VICINITY MAP
707 w..t - suc• 200 (so9) ~-ea4o TRAFFlC IMPA~CT ANALYSIS
\ spoka,., rrA 99204 FAx: (509) 45e-W44~ ` ~ ` .10/
/ - \
' Ef) \
Z
(L
\ ~ _ ~
~ < w
tii+\~\ ~ ` • • h ~r ~ ~ : a ~ cl)
I \ ` ~ ~ ~ ,
. . ~t ~
~ ~ ~ N ~
N
~ ~ .
04
.
9o o = ~ ~ dF ~ 04 ,
1°
F
aooa
a
8~ ~g
i
\ / 1 • ,
I % I ' L- O
O ` ~ ~r^
~ •R v 1
L --Jii
~
,
0 1 Q Q
V ~ ooooa ~ Z h
t : _ •
' - 1
~ ' .
I ( 1
1 Z i•l 4),
I '
~
1
y
b ~
~
\ P 1
~ O.
1
^a7 S 7.00.OODON
Qd0Y SLYNId - - - - .~s~~~ - - - - ~
`
I NLAND FlGURE 2 1/ \
PACIFIC uAwsorv soA rRAFFIc
I ENGINEERING
SITE MAP TRqFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 w«c w, • suc. zoo (soo) 458-6e40
` 4okon.. wA 99204 FAx: (509) 45e-e844 or \ J\ /
• / ~
I
I
( EASTBO U N D RAM P
~
~ ~o
~
I 168~
0 ~
I 402~ ~
O
OC
I ° c° W
G' Z
~
(L
I
I
I
MISSION AVENUE
~
O~i ~ N ~
~ .
~
107 415
85 ~ <::I:= 82
27 37
~ co w
N ~ N i
NOT TO SCALE
1 ~
I NLAND FIGURE 3
PACIFIC 1995 LAWSON SDA TRAFFIC
ENQINEERING EXIST. A.M. PEAK HOUR
707 w.st 7th • suutt.. 200 (sofl) ~-884o TRAF'FIC IMPACT ANALY5IS
`sookom, wA ooM4 FNC: (W9) 4sa-W"., ~ TRAFFIC VO LU M ES J~ /
. ~ `
~
I
I
~ EASTBO U N D RAM P
~
No
I ~
219
0 ~
I 793 p
~ Q
O
0!
N
I ~ V I
N ~ W
CrJ Z
I ~
(
I
MISSION AVENUE
to N o
- M
~
135 tZP I;k= 440 .
I 124==> 136
43 72
I
N ~ N
I NOT TO SCALE
NLAND FlGURE 4
~ I
IPACIFIC 1 995 LAWSON SDA TRAFFlC
ENC3INEERINa EXIST. P.M. PEAK HOUR
~ ~ 7~ ~ ~s z~ TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALY'SIS
` Sbokcns. WA 99204 FAx- (soo) 45a-~., ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES J\ ~
\
• / ~
FASTBO U N D RAM P
~o
0 ~
0 ~
34 ~ p
O
~
(A o) (n
W
Z
CL
MISSION AVENUE
oor%-
~
0 40
25 8
0 ~ ~4
oocc
i
NOT TO SCALE
NLAND FIGURE 5
PACIFIC PROJECT TRAFFIC LAWSON SDA TRAFFlC
ENQINEERINCi A.M. PEAK HOUR
707 w..t • sult. 200 (5os) 4sa-se4o TRAFFIC IMPA~CT ANALYSIS
` spoka,., wa► 992U FAx: (so~) 4W-M", ` TRAFFI C VO LU M ES
•
• / 1
~
I
( EASTBO U N D RAM P
~
I Mo
I
0 ~
0
~ 23 pQ
~
~
I V)
cA o W
Z
~
I
I
I
MISSION AVENUE
~
0 0~
~
0 63 .
I ~ 19 20
0 ~ ~10
I
0 0 .0.
~
NOT TO SCALE
\ 1 = ~
00 NLAND FlGURE 6
PACIFIC PROJECT TRAFFIC LAWSON SOA TRAFflC
ENaINEERING P.M. PEAK HOUR
TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 w«t 7u • su~t• 200 (sos) 458-8840
` spokoM. WA 99204 FAx: (509) 45a-aa"~ TRAFFI C-VO LU M ES ~
~ ~
I
~ EASTBOUND RAMP
~
~
~
173 ~
0
440 ~ pQ
~
~ N (n
W W
00 Z
~
MISSION AVENUE
~ 00 N
A I
138 c=':9~ `k= 427 111 134
35 38
Jr^ W ~
W CO CA ~
NOT TO SCALE
r ( INLAND ~ FIGURE 7
PACIFIC 6U I LD 0 UT YEAR W/0 ~~ON SDA TRAFFIC
ENGINEERINQ PROJECT A.M. PEAK HR
~ w.st 7th • su~t. 200 (sos) 4sa-8s4o TRAFFlC IMPA~CT ANALYSIS
~ spoke», wA "2N FAx: 4W-W", ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES / \ ~
! / ~
(
I
EASTBO U N D RAM P r g~
N
226 ~
0 ~
I 839 ~ Q
0
w rn V)
J w
Z
EL
. MISSION AVENUE
~
o co -
r- N I~
N M
~
203 453 .
187 ~ 189
65 74
~
~
~ N
(A
NOT TO SCALE
\ 0/
~ I NLAND FIGURE 8 1~ 1
PACIFIC BUILD OUT YEAR W/0 LAWSON SDA TRAFFIC
ENGINEERINCi PROJECT P.M. PEAK HR
TRAF'F1C IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 w..t 7tn • s~,tt. 200 (sos) 458-e840
` s,),
,kan., WA 99204 FAx: (569) 45848"
0, ` TRAFFI C VO LU M ES J~ /
~
~
~
I
~ EASTBO U N D RAM P
~
oi-
I "
I
173 ~
0 ='J
I 474
~ p
Q
O
I j N
O c~0 w
N z
I ~
I
I
MISSION AVENUE
~
~o~
~ co to
I
~
~
//000~-
138 ~ 467 .
I 136 ~ 142
35 42
I
~ ~ ~
t0 co N
~ i
NOT TO SCALE
~ I NLAND 1 l FIGURE 9 ~ l 1
PACIFIC B U I LD 0 UT YEAR W/ LAWSON SDA TRAFFIC
ENQINEERINCi PROJ ECT A. M. PEAK H R
707 w.st 7tn • sute 200 (sos) 4sa-es4o TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
`saokan., wA NM4 FNC: (5os) 4sa-sa+4~ ~ TRAFFI C VO LU M ES ,
• ~ ~
EASTBO U N D RAM P
M ~
~
N
r ~
22U ~
0
862 ~ p
O
~
N (n
(A N W
~ Z
~
MISSION AVENUE
~
o co r
N cq N
Rt
~
203 516
206 ~ <:I= 209
.65 84
w ~ w
cn~o
~
~
NOT TO SCALE
ol I NLAND FlGURE 10 \
PACIFIC B U I LD 0 UT YEAR W/ LAINSON SDA TRAFFIC
ENQINEERING PROJECT P.M. PEAK HR
~
7 w~ 7~ ~s 2~ TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
~ spokan.. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-&344, ~ TRAFFI C VO LU M ES
,
e
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSAMEX HC9
Area Type Other 5-18-95 AM PEAK
Comment EXISTING CONDITIONS
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 107 85 27 37 82 415 12 965 32 261 786 98
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * NB Le f t *
Thrul * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds * Peds *
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Riqht * Right * *
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 15 OA 21 OA Green 6 OA 15 OA 35 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 3 5 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 3 5
Cycle Length 107 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad] Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 520 3570 0 510 0 146 27 8 D 27 8 D
WB LT 740 3668 0 194 0 202 22 8 C 18 9 C
R 691 1583 0 690 0 437 17 7 C
NB L 116 1770 0 120 0 066 30 3 D 37 1 D
TR 1236 3707 0 974 0 333 37 2 D
SB L 366 1770 0 820 0 207 35 6 D 18 7 C
TR 1737 3663 0 614 0 474 13 9 B
Intersection Delay = 25 9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 765
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBAMEX HC9
Area Type Other 5-18-95 AM PEAK
Comment EXISTING CONDITIONS
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 168 402 1091 193 88 501
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 200 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
----------------------------------------------r
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * PIB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB R1ght * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 31 OA Green 6 OA 15 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 116 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 504 1770 0 377 0 284 21 7 C 15 9 C
R 792 1583 0 288 0 500 11 0 B
P1B TR 2103 3641 0 723 0 578 11 9 B 11 9 B
SB L 107 1770 0 927 0 060 64 8 F 20 9 C
T 1670 3725 0 355 0 448 13 6 B
Intersection Delay = 14 9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 630
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSPMEX HC9
Area Type Other 5-18-95 PM PEAK
Comment EXISTING CONDITIONS
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 135 124 43 72 136 440 25 962 25 360 1224 150
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds ~ Peds *
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 12 OA 21 OA Green 6 OA 18 OA 35 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 6 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 3 5
Cycle Length 109 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 409 3566 0 827 0 115 39 5 D 39 5 D
6nTB LT 806 3662 0 289 0 220 22 9 C 17 5 C
R 755 1583 0 622 0 477 14 8 B
NB L 114 1770 0 238 0 064 31 5 D 30 8 D
TR 1209 3711 0 917 0 326 30 8 D
SB L 406 1770 0 948 0 229 49 8 E 25 0 C
TR 1799 3665 0 857 0 491 18 9 C
Intersection Delay = 26 5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 752
,
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBPMEX HC9
Area Type Other 5-18-95 PM PEAK
Comment EXISTING CONDITIONS
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 219 793 1223 244 140 1172
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 100 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 31 OA Green 10 OA 10 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 115 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
~~~--------------------r----.~ ~ ~ ~
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 508 1770 0 469 0 287 22 3 C 31 8 D
R 785 1583 0 960 0 496 34 8 D
NB TR 1959 3633 0 855 0 539 16 1 C 16 1 C
SB L 169 1770 0 898 0 096 51 0 E 21 7 C
T 1684 3725 0 794 0 452 18 4 C
Intersection Delay = 21 9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 881
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSABO HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 AM PEAK
Comment BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 138 111 35 38 134 427 19 994 33 269 810 160
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru ~
Right * Right *
Peds * Peds *
WB Left ~ SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right ~ Right
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 15 OA 21 OA Green 6 OA 15 OA 35 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 3 5 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 3 5
Cycle Length 107 secs Phase combinati-on order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c q/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 520 3570 0 660 0 146 29 9 D 29 9 D
WB LT 744 3685 0 280 0 202 23 3 C 19 7 C
R 691 1583 0 710 0 437 18 2 C
NB L 116 1770 0 189 0 066 30 5 D 43 1 E
TR 1236 3708 1 003 0 333 43 3 E
SB L 366 1770 0 845 0 207 37 6 D 19 6 C
TR 1723 3633 0 680 0 474 14 8 B
Intersection Delay = 28 4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 809
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBABO HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 AM PEAK
Comment BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 173 440 1148 203 91 549
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru ~
Right Right
Peds Peds
P1B Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 31 OA Green 6 OA 15 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 116 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad] Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 504 1770 0 387 0 284 21 8 C 16 8 C
R 792 1583 0 628 0 500 14 8 B
NB TR 2104 3642 0 761 0 578 12 5 B 12 5 B
SB L 107 1770 0 964 0 060 73 0 F 21 9 C
T 1670 3725 0 390 0 448 13 9 B
Intersection Delay = 15 8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 659
--------'..,-----------------------r------r-------------------------------
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSPBO HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 PM PEAK
Comment BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 203 187 65 74 189 453 35 991 26 371 1261 210
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Le f t * NB Le f t *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds * Peds *
WB Left ~ SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 16 OA 21 OA Green 6 OA 18 OA 35 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 3 5 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 3 5
Cycle Length 111 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad] Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 533 3567 0 958 0 149 51 1 E 51 1 E
WB LT 715 3674 0 413 0 195 25 4 D 20 5 C
R 709 1583 0 683 0 448 17 6 C
NB L 112 1770 0 330 0 063 32 6 D 36 0 D
TR 1192 3711 0 957 0 321 36 1 D
SB L 400 1770 0 989 0 226 59 3 E 31 3 D
TR 1765 3646 0 935 0 484 24 5 C
Intersection Delay = 32 9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 823
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBPBO HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 PM PEAK
Comment BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 226 839 1313 262 144 1240
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 100 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
SB Right WB Right
Green 31 OA Green 10 OA 10 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 115 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 508 1770 0 484 0 287 22 5 C 43 2 E
R 785 1583 1 023 0 496 49 5 E
NB TR 1958 3632 0 918 0 539 18 6 C 18 6 C
SB L 169 1770 0 927 0 096 55 5 E 23 0 C
T 1684 3725 0 840 0 452 19 4 C
Intersection Delay = 26 0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 936
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSABW HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 AM PEAK
Comment BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 138 136 35 42 142 467 19 994 42 346 810 160
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru ~
Right * Right *
Peds * Peds *
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right * *
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 15 OA 21 OA Green 6 OA 17 OA 40 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 3 5 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 3 5
Cycle Length 114 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad] Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 489 3582 0 763 0 137 35 3 D 35 3 D
WB LT 698 3684 0 318 0 189 25 7 D 23 6 C
R 676 1583 0 794 0 427 22 7 C
NB L 109 1770 0 202 0 062 32 8 D 33 2 D
TR 1321 3703 0 947 0 357 33 2 D
SB L 374 1770 1 063 0 211 84 8 F 31 7 D
TR 1841 3633 0 636 0 507 13 7 B
Intersection Delay = 31 0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 848
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBABW HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 AM PEAK
Comment BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 173 474 1182 209 91 592
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right * *
ss Right ws Right
Green 31 OA Green 6 OA 15 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4.0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 116 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
-r--r--
EB L 504 1770 0 387 0 284 21 8 C 17 4 C
R 792 1583 0 676 0 500 15 8 C
NB TR 2103 3641 0 784 0 578 12 9 B 12 9 B
SB L 107 1770 0 964 0 060 73 0 F 21 6 C
T 1670 3725 0 420 0 448 14 1 B
Intersection Delay = 16 2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 673
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) MISSION AVE (N-S) PINES ROAD (SR 27)
Analyst ALW File Name MISSPBW HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 PM PEAK
Comment BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes > 2 < > 2 1 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 203 206 65 84 209 516 35 991 30 427 1261 210
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
--------n..----------r-s--r.r--.r~-------------rr~~~-----------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * NB Le f t *
Thru * Thru *
Right ~ Right *
Peds ~ Peds *
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right & *
Peds * Peds *
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 16 UA 21 OA Green 6 OA 25 OA 35 OA
Yellow/AR 3 5 3 5 Yellow/AR 4 0 C 0 3 5
Cycle Length 118 secS Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad3 Sat v/c q/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratia Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 502 3573 1 058 0 140 81 3 F 81 3 F
WB LT 672 3673 0 490 0 183 28 3 D 21 9 C
R 761 1583 0 724 0 481 18 1 C
NB L 105 1770 0 351 0 060 35 1 D 52 3 E
TR 1121 3709 1 023 0 302 52 8 E
SB L 482 1770 0 946 0 272 47 4 E 25 9 D
TR 1877 3646 0 879 0 515 20 0 C
Intersection Delay = 38 1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 872
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4 05-25-1995
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) EB I-90 RAMPS (N-S) PINES AVE
Analyst ALW File Name EBPBW HC9
Area Type Other 5-23-95 PM PEAK
Conunent BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 1 1 2< 1 2
Volumes 226 862 1366 272 144 1273
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 100 0 p
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru * *
Right * Riqht * *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 31 OA Green 10 OA 10 OA 50 OA
Yellow/AR 5 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 5 0
Cycle Length 115 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
----------------------------r-----------.~~~~~~~--~~~~------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 508 1770 0 484 0 287 22 5 C 51 1 E
R 785 1583 1 055 0 496 59 6 E
NB TR 1959 3633 0 955 0 539 21 3 C 21 3 C
SB L 169 1770 0 927 0 096 55 5 E 23 6 C
T 1684 3725 0 863 0 452 20 1 C
Intersection Delay = 29 1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0 963
sTL
SX117E 27 AND MSS--ON
An Evaluakion of Intersection Operations
and iAur Quality
As Affected by the Construction of a
Proposed Southbound Left Tum Lane
and a Proposed Hotel/Restaurant
L
Prepwed by
Spok,ane Regional Transportation Counal
For
Washington State Department of Transportation
Eastem Region
Apn14,1995
~ ,
YNH 1RODVCTION
Intersechon Level-of-Servace
Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) was asked by the Waslungton State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Eastern Region to determine how proposed
structural improvements to the intersection at Pines and NLssion would affect traffic
operations at the intersection Additionally, a proposal to build a hotel in the immediate
vicinity of the intersection has been put forth WSDOT also requested SRTC to evaluate
how tnps generated by the hotel would possibly affect intersection level-of-service (LOS)
In order to do the evaluation, four alternative forecast scenanos were developed These
alternatives involve build versus no-build conditions for the proposed intersection
structural improvements and the proposed hoteVrestaurant Assuming an analysis year of
1996, and optimization of signal tirrung, the intersection will function at I.OS "D"
without the construction of the hotel/restaurant With construction of the hotel and no
intersection improvements the capacity analysis indicates the intersection's LOS will
degrade to "E" In the event the proposed intersection improvement is made (which
consists of a dual left-turn only lane for the southbound approach) the intersection will
function at ILOS °'C", without the hotel/restaurant, and I.OS "I)" with the
hoteVrestaurant
It should be noted that at the request of WSDOT this analysis did not take r»to
consideratron the forthcoming construction of a retaiVoffice complex in the northwest
quadrant of the intersection Since tius facility is located directty on the intersection tnps
generated by it will undoubtedly affect intersection operations While growth in
background traffic volumes and turrung movements are part of the analysis the growth
assumption is not sufficient to adequately assess the impacts of a significant trip generator
located adjacent to the intersection
.4rr Qual`ty Confor»:tty Araalysis
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the Washington State Clean Air Conformity
Act both require an evaluation of transportation projects for conforrYUty with the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) This project was evaluated on a build / no-
build assessment and has been found to conform to the NAAQS for carbon monoxide
emissions The specific conditions and results of the conformity analysis are discussed later
in this report
LOS ANALYSIS
METHODOL.OGY & ASSUMPTI0NS
METHODOLOGY
Intersecnon Capac`ty Analysis
An intersection capacity analysis software program, called HC1Vi/Clnema 2 0, was used to
estimate the intersection's forecast level-of-semce (LOS) HCM/Cinema calculation
formulas and spreadsheets are denved directly from the Highway Capacity Manual,
Special Report 209 Tius report is acknowledged as the transportation plannuig standard
for intersection capacity analysis Turning movement volume data was obtained by ground
counts taken at the intersection All intersection analysis is done for the PM peak penod
Tizp Generation
VVith respect to forecast tnp generation for the proposed hotel and restaurant, Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE), Tnp Generation, Sth Edition, was used to develop
forecast tnp generation data for the facility Tnps generated by the facility were then
assigned to turning movements at the subject intersection based on a capacity restrained
assignment of tnps using SRTC's regional travel demand model The forecast
hoteUrestaurant tunung movements were then aggregated with 1996 background turtvng
movement volumes in order to estimate how hoteUrestaurant generated tnps rYUght
incrementally affect intersection LOS (For addittional information about hotel tnp
generation and turnung movement assignment, please refer to Pines/Mission Intersection
Analysis Report, subrnitted to WSDOT November 23, 1994 )
Intersechon Improvement
Data regarding the proposed improvement to the PineslMssion intersection was obtained
from WSDOT The improvement consists of the addition of a southbound dedicated left
turn lane A southbound left turn lane currently exists thus there would be dual left turn
{anes if the proposed improvement is constructed For the analysis it was assumed that the
signal operating characteristics would be altered (signal optimization) with the
construction of the left turn lane Therefore, all alternatives analyses assumes signal
optimization Signal phase durations and cycle lengihs are adjusted based on intersection
configurations and turning movement volumes in order to maximize intersection LOS
ASSUM1'T70NS
1) Base and forecast tur-rung movements
a) The base year for the analysis was assumed to be 1996, based on the projected
build year for the intersection improvement In order to develop 1996 turrung
movement volumes 1995 volumes were increased by 2%
b) 1996 background volumes were aggregated with estimated turrung movement
volumes generated by the proposed hoteVrestaurant facility
2) The analysis reflects volumes and tunung movements for the PM peak penod The
capacity analysis software simulates a peak 15 minute penod of operations dunng the
peak hour LOS for the intersection is computed based on average velucle delay, for
all vehicles using the intersection, occumng dunng tlus 15 nunute peak period
3) A peak hour factor of 90 is used for all intersection capacity analysis i
4) Right-turns-on-red (RT4R) are estimated for sheltered nght turn movements Start-up
lost time of 3 seconds and 3 second vehicle headways are assumed Also considered
is whether there is a dedicated or shared nght turn lane
5) It was assumed there would be one conflicting pedestnan movement per hour for
each leg of the intersection Additionally, a pedestnan button was assumed to exist
6) Platoon amval charactenstics are assumed to be "type 3" (average conditions)
7) No curb parking at the intersection is allowed for
8) There are no conflicting bus operations or vetucle parlung maneuvers at the
intersection
9) It was assumed heavy vehicles would constitute 2°l0 of all movements at the
intersection
10) A 1% grade for the southbound approach leg is used as an input 1
11) In that future signal operation is unknown, HCM/Cinema clesign analysis
software is used to provide optimal signal operations based on forecast i
turning movements and proposed intersection improvements
12) This analysis is confined to signal operations at Mssion and Pines Interaction
between the 1Vtssion/Pines signal and the signal located at the eastbound ramp
terminal is not taken into consideration (This is significant in that the ramp
terminal signal acts as metenng system for eastbound I-90 traffic which exitsi
at the Pines interchange and proceeds southbound on Pines to Mission )
~
a
i
1
PROPOSED INTERSECY YON
llMPROVEMEl\ ll
Capacity and LOS at the NLssion/Pines intersection has been gradually detenorating over
the last several years as traffic volumes at the intersection have steadily increased With
future developments planned for the immediate viciruty of the intersection and other
locations in the Spokane Valley, traffic volumes are projected to grow further thus
exacerbating congestion problems at the intersection In order to alleviate present and
forecast congestion problems, WSDOT has proposed malung a capacity improvement to
the intersection Specifically, the improvement consists of the addition of a dedicated left
turn lane for the southbound approach to the intersection Southbound left turrung
volumes are relatively lugh in proportion to other movements at the intersection
PROPCDSED HO'H'EL/RESTAiJRANT
A proposal to build a 200 room hotel and restaurant facility in the northeast quadrarrt of
the Ptnes & Mrssron intersectlon has been put forth An analysis was done dunng
November of 1994 wimch estimated tnp generation for the proposal as well as how those
tnps would use the Pines/Mssion intersection to access the site For further information
regarding tnp generation and tnp assignment, please refer to the November, 1994 report
ALTERNATIVES ANAlLYSIS
Four alternatives were evaluated with respect to their impact on intersection level-of-
servlce (LOS) and air quality at the location These alternatives involve build and no-build
conditions for both the intersection improvement and the proposed hoteUrestaurant The
alternatives are descnbed below
ALTERIVA TIVE ►,.4
This alternative involves the following conditions
a) 1996 turning movements are used as background volumes
b) No improvements are made to the intersection (no-build)
c) The hoteVrestaurant is not constructed (no-build)
d) Signal operations are optimlzed
.gL7'ERNATIVE "B"
Ttus alternahve involves the following conditions
a) 1996 turning movements are used as background volumes
b) The hoteUrestaurant is built and tnps generated by the facility are aggregated
with background turrung movement volumes '
c) No improvements are made to the intersection (no-build) ~
d) Signal operations are optimized ~
AL7'ERNATITjE „c„
This alternative involves the following conditions
~
~
a) 1996 turrung movements are used as background volumes
b) The hoteVrestaurant is not constructed (no-build) ~
i
c) Improvements to the intersection are made (dedicated left turn lane for
southbound approach is built)
d) Signal operations are optimized
ALTERNATIVE "D
u
Ttus alternative involves the following conditions
a) 1996 turning movement volumes are used as background volumes °
b) The hoteUrestaurant ss constructed and tnps generated by the facility are
aggregated with background traffic volumes i
c) The intersection improvements are made 'I
d) Signal operations are optirruzed '
CiJRRENT AND PROJECT'ED
TIJRNING 1VIOVEMENTS
On the following pages are turning movement diagrams wtuch specify individual turning
movements for what currently exists, what is forecast for 1996, and what will be
generated by the hoteVrestaurant These turning movement projections were used for the
alternatives analysis All LOS calculations and findings are based on these turning
movements used in conjunction with intersection geometry and optimuzed signal
operations All turning movements shown are for the PNi peak period
0
~
I
~
;
i
~
1995
'I'URNING 1VIOVE1VIENT'S
SB LEFT = 327
SB THRU = 1190
SB RIGHT = 189
EB LEFT = 146 WB RIGHT = 343
EB THRU = 159 WB THRU = 168
EB RIGHT = 48 WB LEFT = 80
NB LEFT = 40
NB THRU = 978
NB RIGHT = 29
TOTAL = 3,697
1'IJRNING MOVEMEli1TS GENlERATED
BY 200 ROOM HO'9'EI. WI'TH RESTAIJRAN'T
SB LEFT = 93
SB THRU = 0
SB RIGHT = 0
EB LEFT = 0 WB RIGHT = 53
EB THRU = 3 WB THRU = 32
EB RIGHT = 0 WB LEFT = 25
NBLEFT=O
NB THRU = 0
NB RIGHT = 39
TOTAL = 245
1995 TiJIt1VIlVG li~OVElVElv'I'S
AI)J-USTEI) TO PROJEC`I' BUIg,D YEAR (1996)
!1
SB LEFT = 334
SB THRU = 1214
SB RIGHT = 193
,
EB LEFT = 149 W~B RIGHT = 350
EB THRU = 162 WB THRU = 171 ~
EB RIGHT = 49 WB LEFT = 82
NB LEFT = 41
NB THRU = 998
NB RIGHT = 30
TOTAL = 3 773
1996 TRIEPS AGGREGATED VVITH
HO'TEI,/RES'I'AURA1V'T GErTERATED T'RIPS ~
SB LEFT = 427
SB THRU = 1214 I
SB RIGHT = 193
I
EB LEFT = 149 WB RIGHT = 403
EB THRU = 165 WB THRU = 203
EB RIGHT = 49 WB LEFT = 107
NB LEFT = 41
NB THRU = 998
NB RIGHT = 69 d
TOTAL = 4,018 I
~
9
I.OS ANALYSIS RESULTS
FOR AL'I'ERNATIVES
No Intersechon Improvements
The table on the follovving page summanzes the results of the LOS analysis for the four
alternatives evaluated As the table shows, the intersection us currently functiorung at LOS
"D" The analysis lndicates that the intersection vvill function at LOS "E" in the event a
hoteUrestaurant is constructed There will be a degradation in average delay, especially for
southbound and westbound left turn movements
Intersectaon Improvements
Improvement of the intersection will result in an improvement in LOS from "D" to "C"
However, in terms of average delay per vehicle, the construction of a southbound left turn
lane improves average vehicle delay by only about 4 seconds Tius is only for forecast
1996 traffic wathout the hoteVrestaurant With the construction of the hotel, the
intersection's LOS wnll be "D", even if improvements are made to the intersection
However, the increase in average delay over the no-build alternative (no hoteUno
intersection improvement) will be insigruficant
AIR QUALg1'Y CONFORMg'I'Y
ANALYSIS RESUILTS
An analysis was performed to estimate the potential impacts to air quality associated with
each of the alternatives discussed above T}vs analysis was done for the pollutant Carbon
Monoxide (CO) An intersection dispersion model called CAL3QHC was used to perform
the analysis This model has been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency
Alternative "A" is the base 1996 condition vvith no unprovements to the intersection other
than signal optimization Alternative "B" is the base 1996 condition plus tnps generated by
the hotel / restaurant development, and signal optimization Alternative "C" is the base
1996 condition with an additional southbound left turn lane and signal optirruzation Thus
alternative does not include tnp generation from the proposed hotel / restaurant
development The fourth option is Alternative "D" This alternative includes the geometry
change, hotel / restaurant development, and optimized signal tirrung The maximum carbon
monoxide concentrations modeled at the intersection, in parts per million, are listed in the
chart which follows
INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ANALYSIS
SUMMARY OF RESI➢LTS
FOR INTERSECTION AND HOTEL CONSTRUCTOON ALTERNATIVES
ALT A I ALT B I ALT C ~ ALT D
LANE V/C V/C V/C V/C
APPROACH ROU RATIO DELAY LOS RATIO DELAY LOS RATIO DELi4Y LOS RATIO DELAY LOS
EB LTR 1 07 699 F 0 91 827 F 0 99 424 E 0 86 31 D
,ALL 699 ~ F 827 ~ F~ ~ 424 ~ E 31 ~ D
WB LT 0 61 218 C 0 62 632 F 0 65 179 C 0 59 211 C
R 035 115 B 037 292 D 043 112 B 051 148 B
ALL ~ 115 ~ C 487 ~ E 151 ~ C ~ 183 ~ C
NB L 1 02 142 F 0 94 1678 F 0 79 55 E 11 186 F
TR 0 94 241 C 0 97 62 F 0 97 236 C 0 94 248 C
ALL 284 ~ D F 248 ~ C ~ I 306 ~ D,
SB L 0 93 422 E 0 98 935 F 0 65 191 C 0 97 513 E
TR 082 103 B 076 231 C 095 162 C 091 165 C
ALL 161 ~ C 389 ~ D 168 ~ C 246 ~ C
INTERSECTIONI 1 095 1 253 1 D ~ 0 95 I 522 I E ~ 0 95 1 21 6 ~ C~ 0 95 ~ 26 I D~
T = THRU TABLE A
R = RIGHT
L = LEFT
note when V/C ra6os exceed 12 delay dafa rs not considered vabd
- - ALT A No lntersection Improvement/No Flotel
ALT B No Intersection lmprodement / 200 Room Hotel
ALT C Intersection Improvement / No Hote!
ALT D Intersection Improvement / 200 Room Hofel
Alternative 8 Hour CO Concentrateon
"A" 8 82 ppm
"B" 9 73 ppm
"C" 8 61 ppm
"D" (modil'ied) 8 OS ppm
The National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for CO is 9 00 ppm for an eight
hour average As the chart displays, all but one of the four intersection alternatives
complies with the NAAQS The main point of interest in tims analysis is Alternative "D"
In order to demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS, it was necessary to modify the
signal timing wtuch was calculated by the intersection capacity analysis model In altenng
the signal scheme, it was possible to achieve a positive air quality result It is important to
note that if and when signal operations at the intersection are changed, incident to the
improvements or developments discussed in t}us analysis, any deviation from what is
proposed in the air quality analysis can have senous effects on CO concentrations
CONCLUSION
Intersectron Level-oj-Servrce
The intersectlon currently functions at LOS "D" The construction of a hoteUrestaurant in
the immediate vicinity of the intersection will have a significant impact on its performance
The construction of an additional southbound dedicated left turn lane will significantly
enhance intersection operations However with the construction of the hotel the net
improvement will be relatively small
The real value in constructing the additional left turn lane, thereby increasing intersection
capacity may be in how it affects the eastbound ramp terminal Improved capacity at
Pines and NLssion may allow for greater throughput of traffic from the ternunal to the
intersection By increasing volumes and the frequency of platoons conung from the
terminal excessive queue lengths on the eastbound off-ramp may possibty be avoided
Aar Qualrty Analysis
Based on the analysis conducted in this report, the intersection can pass the National
Ambient Air Quality Standard with both the additional southbound left turn lane and the
tnp generation of the proposed development The key, as stated earlier, is to maintain the
proposed signal tinvng used in the air quality analysis for the modified "D" alternative
This is assuming that approach volumes and turning movements at the intersection reflect
those forecast in the analysis
~
a
~
~
~
~
~
,
~
`
~
~
1
~
~
APPENDIX
1
1-7L T 4
HCM/Cinema VZ 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-1
*~t*~**~*~~****~*~*~*******~******~**~*~***~r*~r****~*~*~~~r**~*~~~~**~~**~~****
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
EAST APPROACH MISSION NORTH APPROACH PINES
WEST APPROACH MISSION SOUTH APPROACH PINES
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-21-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMB:ASE
/~~^ic s~~~ sso~/ 9(~ Tis'1s ^/c -1iv~~ ./o {-,~L SC.•i9cp ultr~r~a.EO S~So
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN
APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET--- ----POCKET---
APP LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET)
EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0
WB 3 1 600 0 0 1 100
NB 3 2 600 1 120 0 0
SB 3 2 600 1 375 0 0
MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FEET)
LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6
APP MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
EB LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH
LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN
LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 162 49 9 1 00 1 00 1 00
WB 82 171 350 162 1 00 1 00 1 00
NB 41 998 30 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
SB 334 1214 193 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 162 49 9 90 90 90
WB 82 171 350 162 90 90 90
NB 41 998 30 0 90 90 90
SB 334 1214 193 0 90 90 90
a
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-2
******~*~~*~**~~****~*~r***~t***~*~~***~*~*****~r*~**~*~***~*~t*~~***~*~r*~*~*~**
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
CONTROL TYPE ACTUATED
PHASING MOVEMENTS SERVICED q
APP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
L=Left Turn, T=Through, R=Right, no Peds, P=Right w Ped conflict
TIMING BY PHASE* ( SECONDS ) ~
°
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Green 2 14 28 11 9 0 0 0
Yellow 2 3 2 3 2 0 10 0
All Red 0 0 1 0 1 0 ~0 0
DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0
CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 78
LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 310
* Timing omitted by user and computed by HCM/Cinema ~
~
TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS
------------------I~------------
AREA TYPE - NON-CBD i
i
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
EAST WEST NORTH ;SOUTH
I
LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ 2 2
EAST WEST NOI RTH SOUTH
CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 1 1 I 1 1
PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3
PERCENT GRADE 0 0 ~J 0 1
CURB PARKING N N N N
NUMBER OF PARKING MANEWERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0
NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0
PEDESTRIAN BUTTON y y y y
MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 17 6 17 6 16 8 16 8
11
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-3
VOLUNIE ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Peak Lane U v
Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj
Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion
App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT
EB L 149 1 00 149 90 166 LTR 390 2 1 05 409 43 11
T 162 1 00 162 90 180
R 49 1 00 49 90 44+
WB L 82 1 00 82 90 91 LT 281 2 1 05 295 32 00
T 171 1 00 171 90 190 R 209 1 1 00 209 00 1 00
R 350 1 00 350 90 209+
NB L 41 1 00 41 90 46 L 46 1 1 00 46 1 00 00
T 998 1 00 998 90 1109 TR 1142 2 1 05 1199 00 03
R 30 1 00 30 90 33
SB L 334 1 00 334 90 371 L 371 1 1 00 371 1 00 00
T 1214 1 00 1214 90 1349 TR 1563 2 1 05 1641 00 14
R 193 1 00 193 90 214
+ RTOR volume not included
SATURATION FLOW ADJUS'I'NIENT WORKSHEET
-
Ideal 5
Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj
Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg Block Type Turn Turn Sat
App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow
w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg
EB LTR 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 983 979 3327
WB LT 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 984 3402
R 1800 1 1 070 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 850 1 00 1621
NB L 1800 1 1 030 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1744
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 996 1 00 3550
SB L 1800 1 1 030 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1735
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 979 1 00 3472
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-4
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
v s v/s g/C c X
Lane Ad3 Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c
App Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio
EB * LTR 409 3327 12 12 384 1 07
WB LT 295 3402 09 14 480 61
* R 209 1621 13 37 603 35
1
NB L 46 1744 03 03 45 1 02
* TR 1199 3550 34 36 1274 94
~
SB * L 371 1735 21 23 400 93
TR 1641 3472 47 58 2003 82
* Critical Lane Group
Sum (v/s) crit = 80 Xc o 95
Cycle Length, C= 78 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L= 12 0 Sec
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ~
Delay-l----- Delay-2--==--- By Lane Group°__===-Approac
X g/C dl c d2 PF Delay Delay
Lane v/c Green (sec cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec
App Grp Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp /veh) LOS /veh) LOS
EB LTR 1 07 12 26 2 384 56 1 85 LTR 69 9 F 69 9 F
i
WB LT 61 14 23 9 480 1 7 85 LT 21 8 C 17 5 C
R 35 37 13 4 603 1 85 R 11 5 B
NB L 1 02 03 28 9 45 113 1 1 00 L 142 0 F 28 4 D
TR 94 36 18 4 1274 9 9 85 TR 24 1 nC
~
SB L 93 23 22 3 400 19 8 1 00 L 42 2 E 16 1 C
TR 82 58 10 1 2003 2 0 85 TR 10 3 B
Intersection
Cycle = 78 25 3 D
~
~
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-5
EFFECTIVE GREEN TIMES AND g/C BY LANE GROUP - DESIGN ANALYSIS
9
Effective
Lane Green Time
App Group (Sec) g/C
EB *LTR 9 12
WB LT 11 14
*R 29 37
NB L 2 03
*TR 28 36
SB *L 18 23
TR 45 58
Cycle Length (C) is 78 secs
* Critical Lane Group
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Reqional Transp Council
96 TMs, NO BUILD, NO HOTEL, SIG OPT MISSION /PINES SUNiMARY
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-21-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMBASE_
LANES GEOMETRY MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT)
App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6
EB 2 2 LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB 3 1 LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
Data L T R L T R L T R L T R
Mvt Vol (vph) 149 162 49 82 171 350 41 998 30 334 1214 193
PHF 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90, 90 90 90
%Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
RTOR Vol (vph) 9 162 0 0
Peds/Hour 1 1 1 l 1
Arrival Type 3 3 3 3
% Grade 0 0 0 1
ParkersJHour 0 0 0 0
Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0
SIGNAL SETTINGS ACTUATED DESIGN ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH 78
PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
GREEN 2 14 28 11 9 0 0 0 0
YELLOW 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 0
RED 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
LOST TIME PER PHASE 3 0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE 12 0 SEC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH
Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS
App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh)
EB LTR 384 1 07 12 LTR 12 69 9 F 69 9 F
i1
WB LT 480 61 14 LT 09 21 8 C 17 5 C
R 603 35 37 R 13 11 5 B
NB L 45 1 02 03 L 03 142 0 F 28 4 D
TR 1274 94 36 TR 34 24 1 C
SB L 400 93 23 L 21 42 2 E 16 1 C
TR 2003 82 58 TR 47 10 3 B
INTERSECT DELAY = 25 3 SEC/VEH Xc = 95 LOS = D Sum(v/s)CR =
~
a
11
n
i - - - - - - - - ° -
1 HC9 Sueuoary Resu 1ts f or Case PP9BASE_ 19 tSS I ON ♦P IPtES
' 96 iP9s P40 &IILD N0 HOTEL SIG OPi PP9 PEA}I Version 20 ~
I . '
~ X Delay 1214 I I I I
Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 1I~ ~34
AM Group Aatio Ratio veh) LOS d
~ E8 -wL?A 12 1107 69 9 F I I I • 171 ~
All 699 F ~
M +
1dB LY 89 61 21 8 C ~ ~
S- - ~ - I
#A 13 35 11 S B
~111 17 5 C 1'~9
h , 162 ~
I~ ~9B L 03 1 82 192 0 F $9 ~ I I
*TA 39 94 24 1 C
I
All 28 4 D I 41 39
I I I 998 6
• I '
f '
SB #L 21 93 92 2 E i L~ 2JIL L 3J9
?A 47 82 10 3 B All 16 1 C -Z~ Z 14 3 28 Ir I 2 1 il 3 y
i 75 '
~ Intersect g8 95 25 3 D ~ 9 2 q
a
a
h
n
~
~
1~
~
Il
~
,I
,
~
~
~
~
4
~
~
~
~
~I
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT NiISSION /PINES Page-1
*~****~r******~~***~*~*******~***~*~*~********~***~r************~r***~*~*****
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
EAST APPROACH MISSION NORTH APPROACH PINES
WEST APPROACH MISSION SOUTH APPROACH PINES
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-29-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMFOBASO
r•ls J'~~
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN
APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET--- ----POCKET---
APP LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET)
EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0
WB 3 1 600 0 0 1 100
NB 3 2 600 1 120 0 0
SB 3 2 600 1 375 0 0
MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET)
LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6
APP MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
EB LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH
LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN
LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 165 49 9 1 00 1 00 1 00
WB 107 203 403 162 1 00 1 00 1 00
NB 41 998 69 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
SB 427 1214 193 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 165 49 9 90 90 90
WB 107 203 403 162 90 90 90
NB 41 998 69 0 90 90 90
SB 427 1214 193 0 90 90 90
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-2
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
CONTROL TYPE ACTUATED
PHASING MOVEMENTS SERVICED
APP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
L=Left Turn, T=Through, R=Right, no Peds, P=Right w Ped conflict
TIMING BY PHASE* (SECONDS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Green 7 61 91 43 34 0 0 0
Yellow 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 0
All Red 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0
CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 250
LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 3 0
~ Timing omitted by user and computed by HCM/Cinema 0
TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ~
AREA TYPE - NON-CBD ~
I
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2~ 2 2
0
u
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 1 1 1 1
PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3
PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 1
CURB PARKING N N N N
NUMBER OF PARKING MANEWERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0
NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0
PEDESTRIAN BUTTON Y Y Y y
MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 17 6 17 6 16 8 16 8
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-3
VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Peak Lane U v
Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj
Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion
App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT
EB L 149 1 00 149 90 166 LTR 393 2 1 05 413 42 11
T 165 1 00 165 90 183
R 49 1 00 49 90 44+
WB L 107 1 00 107 90 119 LT 345 2 1 05 362 34 00
T 203 1 00 203 90 226 R 268 1 1 00 268 00 1 00
R 403 1 00 403 90 268+
NB L 41 1 00 41 90 46 L 46 1 1 00 46 1 00 00
T 998 1 00 998 90 1109 TR 1186 2 1 05 1245 00 06
R 69 1 00 69 90 77
SB L 427 1 00 427 90 474 L 474 1 1 00 474 1 00 00
T 1214 1 00 1214 90 1349 TR 1563 2 1 05 1641 00 14
R 193 1 00 193 90 214
+ RTOR volume not included
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Ideal s
Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj
Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg Block Type Turn Turn Sat
App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow
w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg
EB LTR 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 983 979 3327
WB LT 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 983 3398
R 1800 1 1 070 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 850 1 00 1621
NB L 1800 1 1 030 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1744
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 990 1 00 3528
SB L 1800 1 1 030 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1735
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 979 1 00 3472
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Paqe-4
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
v s v/s g/C c X
Lane Ad] Flow Ad] Sat Flow Green Capacaty v/c
App Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio
EB LTR 413 3327 12 14 452 91
WB LT 362 3398 11 17 584 62
* R 268 1621 17 45 733 37
NB L 46 1744 03 03 49 94
* TR 1245 3528 35 36 1284 97
SB * L 474 1735 27 28 486 98
TR 1641 3472 47 62 2153 76
* Critical Lane Group ~
Sum(v/s)crit = 93 Xc = 97
Cycle Length, C= 250 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L= 12 0 Sec
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
Delay 1--- Delay 2- By Lane Group -Approac
X g/C dl c d2 PF Delay Delay
Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec
App Grp Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp /veh) LOS /veh) LOS
0
EB LTR 91 14 81 0 452 16 3 85 LTR 82 7 F 82 7 F
WB LT 62 17 72 9 584 1 4 85 LT 63 2 F 48 7 E
R 37 45 34 2 733 1 85 R 29 2 D
NB L 94 03 92 2 49 75 6 1 00 L 167 8 F 65 8 F
TR 97 36 59 4 1284 13 6 85 TR 62 0 F
~
SB L 98 28 67 7 486 25 7 1 00 L 93 5 F 38 9 D
TR 76 62 26 0 2153 1 2 85 TR 23 1 C
Intersection
Cycle = 250 52 2 E
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT MISSION /PINES Page-5
EFFECTIVE GREEN TIMES AND g/C BY LANE GROUP - DESIGN ANALYSIS
9
Ef f ective
Lane Green Time
App Group (Sec) g/C
EB LTR 34 14
WB LT 43 17
*R 113 45
NB L 7 03
*TR 91 36
SB *L 70 28
TR 155 62
Cycle Length (C) is 250 secs
* Critical Lane Group
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,NO-BUILD,WITH HOTEL,SIG OPT MISSION /PINES SUMMARy
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-29-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMFOBASt
LANES GEOMETRY MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT)
App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6
EB 2 2 LT 11 0 TR 11 0 °
WB 3 1 LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
Data L T R L T R L T R L T R
Mvt Vol (vph) 149 165 49 107 203 403 41 998 69 427 1214 193
PHF 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
oHvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
RTOR Vol (vph) 9 162 0 0
Peds/Hour 1 1 1 1
Arrival Type 3 3 3 3
o Grade 0 0 0 1
Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 p
Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0
SIGNAL SETTINGS ACTUATED DESIGN ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH 250
PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
GREEN 7 61 91 43 34 0 0 0 0
YELLOW 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 0
RED 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
LOST TIME PER PHASE 3 0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE 12 0 SEC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH
Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS
App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh)
EB LTR 452 91 14 LTR 12 82 7 F 82 7 F
WB LT 584 62 17 LT 11 63 2 F 48 7 E
R 733 37 45 R 17 29 2 D
NB L 49 94 03 L 03 167 8 F 65 8 F
TR 1284 97 36 TR 35 62 0 F
SB L 486 98 28 L 27 93 5 F 38 9 D
TR 2153 76 62 TR 47 23 1 C
---------------------------A'=
INTERSECT DELAY = 52 2 SEC/VEH Xc = 97 LOS = E Sum(v/s)CR =
HGY9 Suevnary Resu lts for Case PMBASO P9ISS ION /P IP4ES I 96 Ti'1s M-BUILD WIYH HOTEL SIG OPT PP9 PF.A)t Version 20
t - - - r
X De1 ay JL214 I I ~r
r_ I I
~ Lane v/s v/c (sec/ 190 ~27
App Group Aatfo Ratio veh) LOS j 4 ~403
, EB L?A 12 91 82 ? F ~ II II` I 9 203 1
i All 82 7 F ~ ~l il' 1 I ~ 1@7 '
~
i
~ 9JB LY fi 62 63 2 F j--------~ _l
r
*A 17 37 29 2 D
I~ I I
A 11 48 ? E 149
j 165
~ PiB L 83 94 167 8 F 49 ~ I I
*TR 35 97 62 0 F I I ~ I
All 65 e F 41 69
I I
998
, SB #L Z? 98 93 5 F ; i L L 2JIL L 3ji 4 L r
~ i R 47 76 2 3 1 C fr ~
, 7~ 2 61 3 91 II 2 Y 93 3 'S
A11 38 9 D '
Intecsect 93 97 52 2 E
_ , 34 2 1.
~
,91-7- r.
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES Page-1
**~~~~***~*~*~~~**~**~~~~r**~*~**~~*~**~~~~r*~t~*~***~*~*~*******~**~r***~~~**
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
-
EAST APPROACH MISSION NORTH APPROACH PINES
WEST APPROACH MISSION SOUTH APPROACH PINES
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-21-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE
/P•q4masm•/, 9(0 ,545c- P/N .8.9)PRso
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY S~c~•~~.. apT",r" 2~0
LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN
APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET--- ----POCKET---
APP LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET)
EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0
WB 3 1 600 0 0 1 100
NB 3 2 600 1 70 0 0
SB 4 2 600 1 300 0 0
MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET)
LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6
APP MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
EB LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB L 12 0 L 12 0 T 12 0 TR 12 0
L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH
LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN
LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 162 70 9 1 00 1 00 1 00
WB 82 171 350 162 1 00 1 00 1 00
NB 41 998 30 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
SB 334 1214 193 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 162 70 9 90 90 90
WB 82 171 350 162 90 90 90
NB 41 998 30 0 90 90 90
SB 334 1214 193 0 90 90 90
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES Page-2
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
CONTROL TYPE ACTUATED
PHASING MOVEMENTS SERVICED
APP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB R LTR L-r 149
WB R R LTR w~ LT W, 4-1
NB L TR sb T, " - L°I w~-f►,, 49
SB L LTR TR se> LT =4Q we) LY ~ tio
L=Left Turn, T=Through, R=Right, no Peds, P=Right w Ped conflict
TIMING BY PHASE* (SECONDS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Green 2 7 21 8 8 0 0 0
Yellow 2 2 2 3 2 0 0 0
All Red 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0
CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 60
LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 3 0
~ Timing omitted by user and computed by HCHT/Cinema
TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS
AREA TYPE - NON-CBD
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 1 1 1 1
PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3
PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 1
CURB PARKING N N N N
NUMBER OF PARKING MANEWERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0
NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0
PEDESTRIAN BUTTON y y y y
MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20 5 20 5 16 8 16 8
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES Page-3
VOLUME ADJUSTMEIdT WORKSHEET
Peak Lane U v
Current Mvt NTvt Group Lane Adj
Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion
App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT
EB L 149 1 00 149 90 166 LTR 414 2 1 05 435 40 16
T 162 1 00 162 90 180
R 70 1 00 70 90 68+
WB L 82 1 00 82 90 91 LT 281 2 1 05 295 32 00
T 171 1 00 171 90 190 R 209 1 1 00 209 00 1 00
R 350 1 00 350 90 209+
NB L 41 1 00 41 90 46 L 46 1 1 00 46 1 00 00
T 998 1 00 998 90 1109 TR 1142 2 1 05 1199 00 03
R 30 1 00 30 90 33
SB L 334 1 00 334 90 371 L 371 2 1 05 390 1 00 00
T 1214 1 00 1214 90 1349 TR 1563 2 1 05 1641 00 14
R 193 1 00 193 90 214
+ RTOR volume not included
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Ideal S
Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj
Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg Block Type Turn Turn Sat
App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow
w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg
EB LTR 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 975 980 3303
I 105;P
I'7D I~
WB LT 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 984 3402
R 1800 1 1 070 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 850 1 00 1621
NB L 1800 1 1 030 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1744
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 996 1 00 3550~)
Irm5
SB L 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 920 3262t)
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 979 1 00 3472~
Ir13lo
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES Page-4
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
v s v/s g/C c X
Lane Adj Flow Ad3 Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c
App Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio
EB LTR 435 3303 13 13 440 99
WB LT 295 3402 09 13 454 65
* R 209 1621 13 30 486 43
NB * L 46 1744 03 03 58 79
TR 1199 3550 34 35 1242 97
SB L 390 3262 12 18 598 65
• TR 1641 3472 47 50 1736 95
* Critical Lane Group
Sum(v/s)crit = 76 Xc = 95
Cycle Length, C= 60 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L= 12 0 Sec
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
Delay 1--- Delay 2- By Lane Group -Approac
X g/C dl c d2 PF Delay Delay
Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec
App Grp Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp /veh) LOS /veh) LOS
EB LTR 99 13 19 7 440 30 2 85 LTR 42 4 E 42 4 E
WB LT 65 13 18 7 454 2 3 85 LT 17 9 C 15 1 C
R 43 30 12 8 486 4 85 R 11 2 B
NB L 79 03 21 9 58 33 1 1 00 L 55 0 E 24 8 C
TR 97 35 14 5 1242 13 2 85 TR 23 6 C
SB L 65 18 17 3 598 1 8 1 00 L 19 1 C 16 8 C
TR 95 50 10 8 1736 8 3 85 TR 16 2 C
Intersection
Cycle = 60 21 6 C
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES Page-5
EFFECTIVE GREEN TIMES AND g/C BY LANE GROUP - DESIGN ANALYSIS
9
Effective
Lane Green Time
App Group (Sec) g/C
EB LTR 8 13
WB LT 8 13
*R 18 30
NB *L 2 03
TR 21 35
SB L 11 18
*TR 30 50
Cycle Length (C) is 60 secs
* Critical Lane Group
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
1996 TMs,BUILD,SIG OPTIMIZATION MISSION /PINES SUNMARY
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-21-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMFOPRE
LANES GEOMETRY MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT)
App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6
EB 2 2 LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB 3 1 LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB 4 2 L 12 0 L 12 0 T 12 0 TR 12 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------e-
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
Data L T R L T R L T R L T R
Mvt Vol (vph) 149 162 70 82 171 350 41 998 30 334 1214 193
PHF 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
oHvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
RTOR Vol (vph) 9 162 0 0
Peds/Hour 1 1 1 1
Arrival Type 3 3 3 3
% Grade 0 0 0 1
Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0
Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0
SIGNAL SETTINGS ACTUATED DESIGN ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH 60
PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
GREEN 2 7 21 8 8 0 0 0 (1
YELLOW 2 2 2 3 2 0 0 0
RED 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
LOST TIME PER PHASE 3 0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE 12 0 SEC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH
Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS
App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh)
EB LTR 440 99 13 LTR 13 42 4 E 42 4 E
WB LT 454 65 13 LT 09 17 9 C 15 1 C
R 486 43 30 R 13 11 2 B
NB L 58 79 03 L 03 55 0 E 24 8 C
TR 1242 97 35 TR 34 23 6 C
SB L 598 65 18 L 12 19 1 C 16 8 C
TR 1736 95 50 TR 47 16 2 C
INTERSECT DELAY = 21 6 SEC/VEH Xc = 95 LOS = C Sum(v/s)CR =
,
, _ . . . . - _ . - -
~p H(~1 Suenr~ary Resu l~s For Case PMPRBA 11ISS ION /P InS
19% TP'1s BUILD SIG rOP?IP9IZAiI0P9--x Pt1 PEAH Versian 2 0 ~
-r r - -T-
1219 I I I ~
X Delay I I I
190 ~334 I
bane v/s v/c (sec/ ~ I I I I
~ ~kg Group Aat f o Aat io veh ) LOS I I I~ I 350
~ 3"5yz~yo~ I I I I o
~ EB L?R 13 99 92 4 E I II_I I 171
Al l 92 4 E 82
- - - ~
o-
----------:I.
~ UB Li 09 65 1.7 9 C
~ *R 13 43 11 2 B fD 11 15 1 C , 149 _4
I ~ I I~
I 162
~ P9B *I. 83 79 55 8 E 70
I I o~
TA 34 97 23 fi C tto2+7o= L32- I I I~ ~
All 24 8 C + I I 41 39
999 ~ot~9~V +o~a9 - W I- ~ otfr
SB L 12 65 19 1 C i ~ L 2JILL 3jI q L~
~ ~ ~N
*YR 47 95 16 Z C fr
All 16 8 C ; 2~ 2 7 Z 21 II Z 1 8 3 ~
15
I ~
~
I-ntersect 76 95 21 6 C 8 2~ ;
_ - - - °
4- LT -/D
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
EAST APPROACH MISSION NORTH APPROACH PINES
WEST APPROACH MISSION SOUTH APPROACH PINES
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-29-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMFOPRSO
9!o 04c- -,/'ls,
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN
APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH POCKET--- ----POCKET---
APP LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET)
EB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0
WB 3 1 600 0 0 1 100
NB 3 2 600 1 70 0 0
SB 4 2 600 1 300 0 0
MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET)
LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6
APP MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
EB LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB L 12 0 L 12 0 T 12 0 TR 12 0
L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH
LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN
LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CURRENT TR.AFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 165 49 9 1 00 1 00 1 00
WB 107 203 403 154 1 00 1 00 1 00
NB 41 998 69 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
SB 427 1214 193 0 1 00 1 00 1 00
MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS
APP LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT
EB 149 165 49 9 90 90 90
WB 107 203 403 154 90 90 90
NB 41 998 69 0 90 90 90
SB 427 1214 193 0 90 90 90
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES Page-2
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
CONTROL TYPE ACTUATED
PHASING MOVEMENTS SERVICED
APP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB R LTR N16-r%..... ti9 Ee U4
WB R R LTR 14 6 `"T ,9 te T0.- L.
NB L TR sis ,ti, v 40 WST,,, US
SB L LTR TR sg LT (a5 W6 %.T Sy
L=Left Turn, T=Through, R=Right, no Peds, P=Right w Ped conflict
TIMING BY PHASE* (SECONDS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Green 2 9 31 15 12 0 0 0
Yellow 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 0
All Red 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0
CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 83
LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 3 0
* Timing omitted by user and computed by HCM/Cinema
TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS
AREA TYPE - NON-CBD
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 1 1 1 1
PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3
PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 1
CURB PARKING N N N N
NUMBER OF PARKING MANEWERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0
NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0
PEDESTRIAN BUTTON y y y y
MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20 5 20 5 16 8 16 8
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES Page-3
VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Peak Lane U v
Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj
Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow Util Flow Proportion
App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) Grp (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT
EB L 149 1 00 149 90 166 LTR 393 2 1 05 413 42 11
T 165 1 00 165 90 183
R 49 1 00 49 90 44+
WB L 107 1 00 107 90 119 LT 345 2 1 05 362 34 00
T 203 1 00 203 90 226 R 277 1 1 00 277 00 1 00
R 403 1 00 403 90 277+
NB L 41 1 00 41 90 46 L 46 1 1 00 46 1 00 00
T 998 1 00 998 90 1109 TR 1186 2 1 05 1245 00 06
R 69 1 00 69 90 77
SB L 427 1 00 427 90 474 L 474 2 1 05 498 1 00 00
T 1214 1 00 1214 90 1349 TR 1563 2 1 05 1641 00 14
R 193 1 00 193 90 214
+ RTOR volume not included
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Ideal
s
Lane Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Ad3
Lane Flow Width Veh Grade Pkg Block Type Turn Turn Sat
App Group S Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow
w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg
EB LTR 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 983 979 3327
lblo4 i"
t e9 9 c~
WB LT 1800 2 970 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 983 3398
R 1800 1 1 070 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 850 1 00 1621
NB L 1800 1 1 030 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 950 1744
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 1 000 1 00 1 00 1 00 990 1 00 3528
I-1 toy~
1e3l SB L 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 920 3262~
TR 1800 2 1 000 990 995 1 00 1 00 1 00 979 1 00 3472
%-I 3c,
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES Page-4
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
v s v/s g/C c X
Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c
App Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio
EB LTR 413 3327 12 14 481 86
WB LT 362 3398 11 18 614 59
* R 277 1621 17 34 547 51
NB L 46 1744 03 02 42 1 10
* TR 1245 3528 35 37 1318 94
SB * L 498 3262 15 16 511 97
TR 1641 3472 47 52 1799 91
~ Critical Lane Group
Sum(v/s)crit = 81 Xc = 95
Cycle Length, C= 83 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L= 12 0 Sec
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
Delay 1--- Delay 2- By Lane Group -Approac
X g/C dl c d2 PF Delay Delay
Lane v/c Green (sec Cap (sec Prog Lane (sec (sec
App Grp Ratio Ratio /veh) (vph) /veh) Fact Grp /veh) LOS /veh) LOS
EB LTR 86 14 26 4 481 10 1 85 LTR 31 0 D 31 0 D
WB LT 59 18 23 7 614 1 1 85 LT 21 1 C 18 3 C
R 51 34 16 7 547 7 85 R 14 8 B
NB L 1 10 02 30 8 42 155 3 1 00 L 186 0 F 30 6 D
TR 94 37 19 1 1318 10 1 85 TR 24 8 C
SB L 97 16 26 5 511 24 8 1 00 L 51 3 E 24 6 C
TR 91 52 13 9 1799 5 5 85 TR 16 5 C
Intersection
Cycle = 83 26 0 D
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES Page-5
EFFECTIVE GREEN TIMES AND g/C BY LANE GROUP - DESIGN ANALYSIS
g
Effective
Lane Green Time
App Group (Sec) g/C
EB LTR 12 14
WB LT 15 18
*R 28 34
NB L 2 02
*TR 31 37
SB *L 13 16
TR 43 52
Cycle Length (C) is 83 secs
* Critical Lane Group
HCM/Cinema V2 0 ORGANIZATION Spokane Regional Transp Council
96 TMs,HOTEL/REST,BUILD,SIGNAL OPT MISSION /PINES SUNlMARY
ANALYST BENNETT ANALYSIS DATE 3-29-95
ANALYSIS PERIOD PM PEAK CASE PMFOPRSc
LANES GEOMETRY MOVENlENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FT)
App Outbnd Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6
EB 2 2 LT 11 0 TR 11 0
WB 3 1 LT 11 0 T 11 0 R 14 0
NB 3 2 L 13 0 T 11 0 TR 13 0
SB 4 2 L 12 0 L 12 0 T 12 0 TR 12 0
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
Data L T R L T R L T R L T R
Mvt Vol (vph) 149 165 49 107 203 403 41 998 69 427 1214 193
PHF 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
%Hvy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
RTOR Vol (vph) 9 154 0 0
Peds/Hour 1 1 1 1
Arrival Type 3 3 3 3
% Grade 0 0 0 1
Parkers/Hour 0 0 0 0
Buses/Hour 0 0 0 0
SIGNAL SETTINGS ACTUATED DESIGN ANALYSIS CYCLE LENGTH 83
PHASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PED ONLY
EB R LTR
WB R R LTR
NB L TR
SB L LTR TR
GREEN 2 9 31 15 12 0 0 0 0
YELLOW 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 0
RED 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
LOST TIME PER PHASE 3 0 SEC LOST TIME PER CYCLE 12 0 SEC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (HCM PROCEDURE) APPROACH
Lane Cap v/c g/c Lane v/s Delay Delay LOS
App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratlo (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh)
EB LTR 481 86 14 LTR 12 31 0 D 31 0 D
WB LT 614 59 18 LT 11 21 1 C 18 3 C
R 547 51 34 R 17 14 8 B
NB L 42 1 10 02 L 03 186 0 F 30 6 D
TR 1318 94 37 TR 35 24 8 C
SB L 511 97 16 L 15 51 3 E 24 6 C
TR 1799 91 52 TR 47 16 5 C
INTERSECT DELAY = 26 0 SEC/VEH Xc = 95 LOS = D Sum(v/s)CR =
H(Y9 Sunnary Resu 1 ts f os Case PMPRS'0 HISS I OA9 /P 1 P4FS
96 Tt1s HOiEL/RES? &IILD SIGP4AI. OPi PI1 PF.A}R Version 2 e
'
,I 143y 1214 I I I I
, x neiay ;i
193 ~427 ~ 1y0 Hc 3~ 33~
I
Lane v/s vic (sec/ ' J
App Group Aatio Ratio veh) LOS ; I I I I ~403 I
~ EB L?R 12 86 31 0 D i43y y2~ -1401 I I I I ~283 ~
I A 11 31 8 D 'i I i I~1 ~I 1 ~ 107 ~
I ' ~ i
WB LT ii 59 21 1 C i.
*A 17 51 14 g B
~ A 11 18 3 C ' 149 I I I~ I~ '
R ibs WB L 93 1 18 iim 8r 49 -1
'I *TR 35 94 24 8 C 1`25
f All 30 6 D ~ 14'5 ..,q - 41 69
( ~ I I 998 ~ ►o~ ~ SB *L 15 97 51 3 E L L 2JIL L 3jI 9 L~
i rR 47 91 16 5 C
All 24 6 C ¢ ~ir
2~ 2 9 3 31 II 2 1 15 3 ~
y
;
5 I
Intersect 81 95 26 0 D ~
_.j._~ 2 i,
PINMISBS CAL30NC LINE SOURCE DISPERS[ON MODEL VERSION 2 0 JANUARY 1992 PAGE
J08 Pines & Mtsston PM Peak Base Alt A 96' RUN Pines $ Mtsston Base 1996 Alt A
DATE 03/30/95 TIME 16 25
SITE 8 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABIES
VS = 0 0 CM/S VD = 0 0 CM/S ZO = 175 CM
U= 1 0 M/S CLAS = S(E) ATIM = 60 MINUTES MIXH = 1000 M AMB = 3 0 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
LINK OESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (FT) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H u V/C QUEUE
° X1 If1 X2 1f2 " (FT) (DEG) (G/MI) (fT) (FT) (VEN)
a f
1 Pines NB Appr * 18 0 1000 0 18 0 0 0° 1000 360 AG 1069 15 8 0 0 44 0
2 Pines NB Queue ~ 18 0 32 0 18 0 169 6* 138 180 AG 1322 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 84 7 0
3 Pines NB Q LT ~ 0 0 32 0 0 0 270 6* 239 180 AG 1027 100 0 0 0 12 0 1 86 12 1
4 Pines NB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 500 0* 500 360 AG 1497 15 8 0 0 44 0
5 Pines SB Appr ° 18 0 500 0 18 0 0 0* 500 180 AG 1741 15 8 0 0 44 0
6 Pines SB Queue * 18 0 43 0 18 0 169 9° 127 360 AG 928 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 77 6 4
7 Pines SB 0 LT * 0 0 43 0 0 0 228 5° 185 360 AG 830 100 0 0 0 12 0 1 00 9 4
8 Pines SB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 1000 0* 1000 180 AG 1345 15 8 0 0 44 0
9 Misston EB Appr * 1000 0 6 0 0 0 6 0* 1000 90 AG 360 18 4 0 0 31 0
10 Mission EB Queue * 40 0 6 0 111 6 6 0* 72 270 AG 928 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 88 3 6
11 Misston EB THR 0 ' 40 0 17 0 164 9 17 0* 125 270 AG 900 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 99 6 3
12 Mission EB Depart* 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0° 1000 40 AG 526 18 4 0 0 45 0
13 Plisston WB Appr * 1000 0 11 0 0 0 11 0* 1000 270 AG 603 18 4 0 0 42 0
14 Mission 416 Queue * 40 0 11 0 84 1 11 0 d 44 90 AG 1800 100 0 0 0 22 0 0 58 2 2
15 Mission RT Queue ° 40 0 28 0 131 9 28 0* 92 90 AG 675 100 0 0 0 14 0 0 65 4 7
16 Mission WB Depart" 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0* 1000 270 AG 405 18 4 0 0 42 0
1
PAGE 2
JOB Ptnes 8 Mission PM Peak Base Alt A 96' RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt A
oaTE 03/30/95 TIME 16 25
ADDITIONAL GUEUE LINK PARAMETERS
LINK DESCRiPTION ° CYCLE RED CIEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDIE SIGNAL ARRJVAI
* IENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE
* (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPN) (gm/hr)
a
2 Pines NB Queue * 78 47 2 0 1028 1775 409 00 2 3
3 Ptnes NB G LT * 78 73 2 0 41 1744 409 00 2 3
6 Pines SB Queue * TS 33 2 0 1407 1736 409 00 2 3
7 Pines SB 0 lT * 78 59 2 0 334 1735 409 00 2 3
10 Mission EB Queue * 78 66 2 0 149 1664 409 00 2 3
11 Mission EB THR 0 ' 78 64 2 0 211 1664 409 00 2 3
14 Mission WB Queue * 78 64 2 0 253 1701 409 00 2 3
15 14ission RT Queue * 78 48 2 0 350 1621 409 00 2 3
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
* COOROINATES (FT) *
1
RECEPTOR * x Y Z *
# *
1 REC 1(NW CORNER) " 42 0 187 0 6 0 *
2 REC 2(NW CORNER) * 42 0 89 0 b 0 *
3 REC 3(NU CORNER) * 44 0 25 0 6 0 *
4 REC 4(NW CORNER) * 108 0 23 0 6 0 «
5 REC S(NU CORNER) * 207 0 23 0 6 0 *
6 REC 6(SU CORNER) * 207 0 34 0 6 0 *
7 REC 7(S41 CORNER) * 108 0 34 0 6 0 *
8 REC 8(SW CORNER) * 44 0 36 0 b 0 *
9 REC 9((SW CORNER) 42 0 100 0 6 0 tr
10 REC 10 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 199 0 6 0 *
11 REC 11 (SE CORNER) 42 0 199 0 6 0 *
12 REC 12 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 100 0 6 0 *
13 REC 13 (SE CORNER) " 44 0 36 0 6 0 *
14 REC 14 (SE COR!!ER) * 108 0 34 0 6 0 *
15 REC 15 (SE CORNER) * 207 0 34 0 6 0 "
16 REC 16 (NE CORPIER) * 207 0 45 0 6 0 *
17 REC 17 (NE CORNER) * 108 0 45 0 6 0 '
18 REC 18 (NE CORNER) * 44 0 47 0 6 0 *
19 REC 19 (NE CORNER) A 42 0 111 0 6 0 *
20 REC 20 (NE CORNER) * 42 0 210 0 6 0 *
1
PAGE 3
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Base Alt A 96' RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt A
MOOEL RESULTS
REMARKS In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentratton onty the first
angle of the angtes with same maximun
concentrations is indicated as maximun
WIND ANGLE RANGE 0 360
WIND * CONCENTRAT[ON
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)t REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS RECb RECT REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
t
0 * 4 4 5 3 5 9 3 1 3 0 3 4 T 1 9 5 7 4 6 9 8 7 7 9 8 5 4 7 3 6 3 0 3 1 4 6 4
5 * 48 64 74 33 30 34 7 8 103 80 80 69 69 83 46 36 30 30 39 3
10 * 5 0 7 5 8 8 3 7 3 0 3 5 8 4 10 6 8 0 8 6 5 4 6 1 8 0 4 4 3 6 3 0 3 0 3 4 3
15 * 5 3 8 4 9 8 4 0 3 1 3 6 9 1 10 5 7 7 9 7 4 4 S 6 8 0 4 3 3 6 3 0 3 0 3 2 3
20 51 93 101 65 33 37 98 95 76 100 40 53 80 41 36 30 30 31 3
25 * 51 97 101 50 35 40 104 82 73 105 36 49 78 40 36 30 30 31 3
30 ° 5 1 98 97 5 S 35 42 109 70 75 104 34 44 76 38 36 30 30 30 3
35 * 52 97 93 58 36 45 11 1 64 84 101 32 40 71 37 36 30 30 30 3
40 ° 53 96 88 61 40 49 111 59 91 97 32 37 67 38 37 30 30 30 3
45 ' S 5 9 S 8 3 6 3 4 2 5 3 11 0 b 1 9 7 9 1 3 2 3 S 6 1 3 7 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
50 * 5 S 9 0 7 6 6 3 4 5 S 6 10 7 6 2 9 8 8 7 3 2 3 S S 4 3 7 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
55 * 57 89 71 62 48 59 105 63 96 81 32 34 49 37 37 30 30 30 3
60 5 7 8 7 6 8 6 1 4 9 6 6 10 3 6 8 9 2 7 7 3 2 3 4 4 6 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
65 * 5 8 8 6 6 3 S 9 5 0 7 3 10 1 7 1 8 9 7 2 3 2 3 4 4 2 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
70 * 5 7 8 3 6 0 S 8 5 1 8 0 9 T 7 2 8 5 6 6 3 2 3 4 4 2 4 0 6 0 3 0 3 0 3
2
75 * 5 7 8 3 6 1 5 9 5 3 8 8 9 1 7 3 8 S 6 4 3 2 3 4 4 0 4 1 4 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3
80 * S 7 83 67 61 54 87 84 72 84 63 32 34 4 1 41 4 1 3 1 3 1 33 3
85 * 58 85 74 64 62 84 77 73 85 61 30 33 40 41 4 1 33 33 36 3
90 * 5 8 8 7 8 1 6 7 6 8 7 4 6 9 7 4 8 4 S 9 3 0 3 2 3 8 3 9 3 9 3 6 3 6 4 2 3
95 * S 9 9 0 8 1 6 9 7 3 6 6 6 3 7 6 8 3 S 9 3 0 3 0 3 6 3 6 3 6 3 8 3 9 4 8 3
100 * 6 0 9 2 7 9 6 7 7 7 S 8 6 2 7 7 8 1 5 8 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 8 4 1 5 4 3
105 * 6 2 9 G 7 3 7 0 8 0 5 3 6 2 7 8 8 1 S T 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 9 4 Z 5 9 3
110 * b S 10 0 6 9 7 3 T 9 5 2 6 1 7 8 8 0 5 7 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 8 4 3 6 3 3
115 * T 0 10 6 6 2 8 2 T 9 S 0 6 3 8 2 8 2 S 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 8 4 5 6 7 3
120 " 7 4 10 9 S 9 9 0 7 T 4 8 6 2 8 3 8 3 6 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 T 4 7 7 1 3
125 * 80 109 61 95 71 46 61 85 82 60 30 30 30 30 30 37 50 76 3
130 * 8 4 10 8 6 5 10 3 6 5 4 3 6 2 8 6 8 2 6 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 7 5 2 8 0 3
135 * 94 105 71 106 59 42 59 87 81 60 30 30 30 30 30 36 53 85 4
160 * 9 9 9 8 7 8 10 4 S 4 3 9 5 6 8 8 7 8 6 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 6 S 5 8 8 4
145 " 10 6 9 3 8 4 10 1 4 8 3 7 S 2 8 9 7 5 5 7 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 S S 4 9 3 4
150 * 11 3 9 6 9 2 9 8 4 4 3 6 5 0 8 9 7 3 5 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 S 5 5 9 4 4
155 * 118 96 97 92 41 3S 47 85 71 54 31 31 30 30 30 35 S4 9S S
160 * 11 9 9 9 9 9 8 5 4 0 3 5 4 3 8 0 6 8 5 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 5 5 4 9 6 5
165 * 122 96 99 81 39 34 41 76 67 53 32 32 33 30 30 35 54 95 6
170 * 11 2 93 93 77 37 33 39 67 61 51 35 36 38 30 30 35 54 100 6
175 ° 100 85 87 71 36 31 36 58 55 48 38 43 49 31 30 35 56 106 7
180 * 84 74 81 65 34 30 33 50 49 4S 43 5 S 64 33 30 35 5 7 11 S 8
185 * 6 7 6 5 7 5 6 0 3 4 3 0 3 1 4 2 4 1 3 9 4 6 6 6 8 0 3 S 3 2 3 7 6 1 12 4 9
190 * 56 5 7 69 5 T 34 30 30 36 36 36 49 78 96 38 32 38 69 126 9
195 * 47 54 67 54 34 30 30 32 33 33 51 89 108 42 34 39 77 119 8
200 * 43 52 67 53 34 30 30 31 31 31 52 100 11 S 46 34 41 88 105 7
205 * 40 51 68 52 34 30 30 31 31 31 53 106 116 52 35 43 99 90 7
1
PAGE 4
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Base Alt A 96' RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt A
41IND 4 CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
•
210 ¢ 3 8 4 9 7 0 S 1 3 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 5 5 10 8 11 S S 7 3 6 4 6 10 7 7 3 7
215 * 3 6 4 8 7 1 S 0 3 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 5 7 10 9 11 0 6 2 3 6 4 9 11 3 6 7 7
220 * 34 45 72 SO 35 30 30 30 31 31 59 107 108 64 39 S 3 11 8 60 8
225 * 34 43 72 49 35 30 30 30 31 31 59 105 104 66 42 57 120 57 8
230 * 33 40 73 47 35 30 30 30 30 30 60 103 100 67 46 61 11 9 61 8
235 ' 32 37 72 45 35 30 30 30 30 30 60 101 100 67 49 62 11 5 62 8
240 * 32 35 70 4 4 37 30 30 30 30 30 60 100 97 67 5 1 63 11 4 66 8
245 * 32 34 65 41 37 30 30 30 30 30 58 97 96 66 53 66 107 TO 8
250 * 32 33 60 40 38 30 30 30 30 30 57 94 93 66 53 72 97 71 7
255 * 32 33 53 40 39 30 30 31 30 30 57 93 91 65 54 75 92 69 7
260 ° 31 33 G 7 39 39 31 32 34 30 30 56 92 92 67 57 77 81 67 7
265 * 3 0 3 2 4 S 4 0 4 0 3 3 3 5 3 8 3 0 3 0 S 7 9 4 9 S 6 9 5 9 7 5 7 0 6 7 7
270 * 3 0 3 2 4 0 3 9 3 8 3 4 3 9 4 6 3 2 3 0 5 8 9 7 9 7 T 1 6 3 6 4 6 4 6 8 T
275 * 30 30 36 38 37 35 45 54 32 30 57 97 98 68 67 57 59 69 7
280 * 3 0 3 0 3 S 3 5 3 S 3 6 4 9 6 3 3 2 3 0 5 8 9 6 9 3 6 7 6 9 5 1 S 6 7 0 7
285 * 30 30 33 33 33 36 54 71 34 32 59 100 86 63 73 49 57 71 7
290 * 3 0 3 0 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 6 S 9 7 6 3 4 3 2 6 0 10 6 7 4 6 4 6 9 4 8 S 7 7 1 7
295 * 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 6 6 2 8 1 3 5 3 2 6 2 11 2 6 4 6 7 6 9 4 7 5 8 7 3 T
300 * 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 5 6 2 8 2 3 7 3 2 6 7 11 7 6 0 7 6 6 9 4 6 5 7 7 6 7
305 * 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 6 2 8 2 4 0 3 2 7 1 12 0 5 7 8 3 6 5 4 3 S 7 7 6 7
3
310 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 6 2 8 2 4 2 3 2 7 8 11 9 5 4 9 3 6 2 4 1 S S 7 7 7
315 « 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 6 1 8 1 4 6 3 4 8 7 11 6 6 0 10 0 S 6 3 9 5 4 7 4 7
320 3 1 31 30 31 3 1 34 60 79 48 35 96 11 5 63 99 S 1 37 S 1 80 7
325 " 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 5 4 T S 5 0 3 7 10 4 11 3 6 9 9 6 4 7 3 7 4 9 7 9 6
330 * 31 31 30 30 30 34 60 76 52 39 114 110 76 90 45 35 46 6
335 ° 31 31 31 30 30 34 60 76 53 41 120 109 81 81 42 34 43 6
340 * 32 32 31 30 30 34 62 75 53 42 124 105 88 72 39 32 41 74 6
345 * 33 33 33 30 30 34 64 7 6 54 46 125 102 94 64 38 31 38 68 6
350 * 3 5 3 6 3 8 3 0 3 0 3 4 6 6 8 2 S 9 S 2 12 1 9 4 9 1 S 6 3 7 3 0 3 S 6 1 S
355 * 39 44 4 T 30 30 34 69 87 66 60 107 88 89 S 1 36 30 33 SS 5
360 44 53 59 31 30 34 71 45 74 64 87 79 65 47 36 30 31 46 4
~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
MAX* 122109101 106808811 1 10698105125 1201161007377120126939T
DEGR°' 165 120 20 135 105 75 35 10 50 25 345 305 205 315 285 260 225 190 185 210
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 12 60 PPM AT 140 DEGREES FROM REC18
4
PINMIATB CAL3GHC LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL VERSION 2 0 JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt B 96 RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Att b
DATE 03/30/95 TIME 16 27
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
VS = 0 0 CM/S VD = 0 0 CM/S ZO = 175 CM
U= 1 0 M/S CLAS = 5(E) ATIM = 60 MINUTES MIXH = 1000 M AMB = 3 0 PPM
L1NK VARIABLES
LiNK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (FT) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C OUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (FT) (DEG) (G/MI) (FT) (FT) (VEH)
1 Pines NB Appr * 18 0 1000 0 18 0 0 0* 1000 360 AG 1108 15 8 0 0 44 0
2 Pines NB Queue * 18 0 32 0 18 0 486 7 * 455 180 AG 1369 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 84 23 1
3 Pines NB 0 LT * 0 0 32 0 0 0 108 3* 76 180 AG 1053 100 0 0 0 12 0 1 00 3 9
4 Pines NB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 500 0° 500 360 AG 1699 15 8 0 0 44 0
5 Ptnes SB Appr * 18 0 500 0 18 0 0 0° 500 180 AG 1834 15 8 0 0 44 0
6 Pines SB Queue * 18 0 43 0 18 0 408 2* 365 360 AG 834 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 67 18 6
7 Pines SB G lT ° 0 0 43 0 0 0 465 7* 423 360 AG 785 100 0 0 0 12 0 0 92 21 5
8 Pines SB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 1000 0* 1000 180 AG 1370 15 8 0 0 44 0
9 Mission EB Appr * 1000 0 6 0 0 0 6 0* 1000 90 AG 363 18 4 0 0 31 0
10 Mission EB Queue t 40 0 6 0 213 5 6 0* 174 270 AG 935 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 68 8 8
11 Mission EB THR 0* 40 0 17 0 281 1 17 0 t 241 270 AG 904 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 80 12 2
12 Mission EB Depart* 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0* 1000 90 AG 661 18 4 0 0 GS 0
13 Mtsston 4B Appr * 1000 0 11 0 0 0 11 0'* 1000 270 AG 713 18 4 0 0 42 0
14 Mission u6 Queue * 40 0 11 0 212 9 11 0* 173 90 AG 1790 100 0 0 0 22 0 0 54 8 8
15 Mission RT Queue * 40 0 28 0 339 7 28 1* 300 90 AG 597 100 0 0 0 14 0 0 57 15 2
16 Mission uB Depart* 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0* 1000 270 AG 437 18 4 0 0 42 0
1
PAGE 2
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt B 96' RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt b
DATE 03/30/95 TIME 16 27
ADDITIONAL OUEUE LINK PARAMETERS
LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE REO CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IOLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL
* LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLON RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE
° (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr)
*
2 Pines NB Oueue • 250 156 2 0 1067 1764 409 00 2 3
3 Pines NB 0 LT * 250 240 2 0 41 1744 409 00 2 3
6 Pines SB oueue * 250 95 2 0 1407 1736 409 00 2 3
7 Pines SB 0 LT * 250 179 2 0 427 1735 409 00 2 3
10 Mission EB Queue * 250 213 2 0 149 1664 409 00 2 3
11 Mission EB THR 0 * 250 206 2 0 214 1664 409 00 2 3
14 Mission WB Queue * 250 204 2 0 310 1699 409 00 2 3
15 Mission RT Queue * 250 136 2 0 403 1621 409 00 2 3
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
* COORDINATES (FT) *
1
RECEPTOR * X Y Z *
* *
1 REC 1(NU CORNER) * 42 0 187 0 6 0 °
2 REC 2(NU CORNER) * 42 0 89 0 b 0 *
3 REC 3(NU CORNER) * 44 0 25 0 6 0 *
4 REC 4(NW CORNER) * 108 0 23 0 6 0 ~
5 REC 5(NU CORNER) * 207 0 23 0 6 0 ~
6 REC 6(SU CORNER) * 207 0 34 0 6 0 •
7 REC 7(SU CORNER) 108 0 34 0 6 0 *
8 REC 8(SU CORNER) * 44 0 36 0 6 0 *
9 REC 4((SW CORNER) * 42 0 100 0 6 0 *
10 REC 10 (SE CORNER) 42 0 199 0 6 0 ~
11 REC 11 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 199 0 6 0 *
12 REC 12 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 100 0 6 0 *
13 REC 13 (SE CORNER) * 44 0 36 0 6 0 *
14 REC 14 (SE CORNER) 108 0 34 0 6 0 °
15 REC 15 (SE CORNER) * 207 0 34 0 6 0 *
16 REC 16 (NE CORNER) 207 0 45 0 6 0 °
17 REC 17 (NE CORNER) " 108 0 45 0 6 0 *
18 REC 18 (NE CORNER) * 44 0 47 0 6 0 °
19 REC 19 (NE CORNER) " 42 0 111 0 6 0 *
20 REC 20 (NE CORNER) ° 42 0 210 0 6 0 ~
1
PAGE 3
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt B 96 RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt b
MOOEL RESULTS
REMARKS [n search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration only the first
angle of the angles with same maximisn
concentrattons is tndicated as maxtmun
WIND ANGLE RANGE 0 360
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE (PPM)
(DEGR)'' REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 REC7 RECS REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
*
0 6 7 7 7 7 6 3 4 3 0 7 3 8 4 10 8 8 S 7 8 9 9 8 9 9 6 8 7 7 2 3 0 3 2 5 8 5
S * 8 4 9 4 9 5 4 1 3 0 7 S 8 4 11 8 9 1 8 8 T 4 7 6 8 8 8 4 6 7 3 0 3 0 4 4 4
10 ' 9 7 10 7 10 7 4 9 3 0 7 9 9 8 12 1 9 1 9 3 6 S 6 8 8 3 8 3 6 1 3 0 3 0 3 7 3
15 * 10 5 11 3 11 2 5 6 3 3 8 3 10 6 11 3 8 6 9 6 5 5 6 3 8 1 8 3 5 6 3 0 3 0 3 3 3
20 * 108 11 2 109 63 38 87 11 2 100 80 96 53 63 81 82 S 2 30 30 31 3
25 * 106 108 104 65 44 94 11 S 85 75 98 5 1 63 82 83 49 30 30 31 3
30 * 102 102 97 67 47 100 11 5 73 80 98 49 62 82 83 48 30 30 30 3
35 * 98 98 91 66 52 103 113 66 88 95 48 6 2 83 84 47 30 30 30 3
40 * 96 96 86 65 53 105 11 1 60 98 94 44 63 86 88 49 30 30 30 3
GS * 91 91 81 64 S 3 108 11 0 62 108 90 41 63 90 89 4 9 30 30 30 3
50 * 89 89 75 6 2 S 1 107 108 64 11 5 86 39 60 91 90 49 30 30 30 3
55 * 87 87 71 61 51 109 107 71 116 82 37 58 93 88 48 30 30 30 3
60 TM 8 5 8 S 6 7 6 0 5 1 11 3 10 6 7 9 11 6 7 6 3 S 5 2 9 4 8 5 4 8 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
65 * 84 84 64 60 5 1 11 7 107 90 113 7 3 35 48 91 81 47 30 30 30 3
70 * 82 82 65 61 51 120 11 2 98 105 70 34 42 87 73 46 30 31 3 '
2
75 * 81 81 71 64 55 123 11 1 102 96 68 32 39 79 64 4 5 32 33 33 3
80 * 81 82 83 74 64 11 9 104 100 92 67 32 36 68 5 7 45 35 39 39 3
85 * 81 85 98 81 75 108 95 97 87 67 3 1 34 5 7 5 0 4 3 4 1 46 S 0 3
90 * 8 2 9 0 11 1 8 8 8 4 9 3 8 2 8 9 8 1 6 S 3 0 3 2 4 T 4 2 4 0 4 7 S 7 6 4 3
95 * 8 3 9 8 11 3 8 9 9 2 7 5 7 2 8 S 7 8 6 S 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 7 3 7 5 5 7 2 8 2 3
100 TM 84 107 109 85 45 63 67 82 75 65 30 30 35 34 34 60 86 97 4
105 ° 86 11 7 93 82 94 SS 63 80 72 65 30 30 31 32 32 64 96 109 4
110 * 9 1 12 2 8 0 7 8 10 3 S 0 6 1 8 0 7 0 b 5 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 6 4 10 4 11 5 4
115 * 9 6 12 5 6 8 8 3 10 2 4 8 6 1 8 3 6 9 6 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 6 4 10 8 11 S 5
120 ; 101 124 64 91 101 4 T 61 85 67 66 30 30 30 30 30 62 11 0 112 5
125 * 108 11 9 63 97 98 47 60 86 69 68 30 30 30 30 30 60 109 110 6
130 * 11 2 11 3 67 103 95 46 58 87 69 69 30 30 30 30 30 59 108 106 6
135 * 116 105 72 105 94 48 57 88 70 70 30 30 30 30 30 57 105 103 6
140 * 11 8 100 7 9 105 91 4 8 57 88 72 72 30 30 30 30 30 5 7 101 99 6
145 * 12 1 9 7 8 8 10 3 9 1 6 7 5 7 8 8 7 6 7 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 5 7 9 9 9 7 6
150 * 11 9 96 95 102 87 45 58 88 7 7 76 31 31 30 30 30 58 99 96 6
155 * 12 1 9 7 10 2 9 8 8 3 4 2 5 7 8 6 7 9 7 7 3 1 3 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 6 1 9 8 9 6 6
160 * 123 103 105 93 78 39 54 84 82 78 33 33 33 30 30 64 97 97 6
165 TM 126 103 107 90 75 37 50 84 80 75 36 37 37 30 30 68 96 98 6
170 ' 114 101 103 85 7 1 34 45 76 75 69 45 48 46 30 30 75 97 104 7
175 * 104 93 96 79 68 3 1 40 68 67 60 60 64 62 33 30 80 100 11 S 8
180 * 9 0 7 7 8 6 7 3 6 4 3 0 3 4 S S 5 5 5 1 7 8 8 4 8 2 3 8 3 0 8 6 10 S 12 7 9
185 * 72 67 7 7 TO 62 30 31 45 45 42 94 101 99 44 33 93 113 137 10
190 ° 57 59 70 68 60 30 30 37 37 37 106 11 1 11 0 52 34 99 121 134 10
195 * 44 54 68 68 57 30 30 32 33 33 11 1 11 L 11 3 59 38 104 126 121 9
200 ¢ 46 53 68 68 55 30 30 31 31 31 108 109 11 1 62 4 1 11 2 132 105 8
205 * 47 53 70 69 54 30 30 31 31 31 103 104 108 63 4 S 11 6 134 89 7
1
PAGE 4
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt B 96' RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt b
W[ND ° CONCENTRATION
ANGIE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 REC7 RECS REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
*
210 * 4 6 S 4 7 0 7 1 5 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 9 4 4 9 10 T 6 3 4 8 11 8 13 4 7 S 7
215 * 4 6 5 4 7 1 7 2 5 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 9 S 9 5 10 6 6 2 4 9 11 9 13 3 6 9 7
220 * G 3 S S 7 3 7 3 S 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 9 1 9 1 10 5 b 0 4 9 12 1 13 0 6 3 8
225 * 41 56 74 75 51 30 30 30 31 31 88 88 105 60 48 126 130 60 8
230 * 39 54 75 77 5 1 30 30 30 30 30 85 85 101 61 48 129 127 65 9
235 * 35 52 78 79 SO 30 30 30 30 30 84 85 101 63 49 132 118 66 9
240 " 33 49 81 80 48 30 30 30 30 30 83 84 100 64 48 137 116 72 4
245 * 32 45 83 80 46 30 30 30 30 30 80 63 97 66 50 138 11 0 78 9
250 * 32 41 82 75 43 30 31 31 30 30 79 84 96 66 5 2 139 103 82 8
255 * 32 37 78 69 42 31 32 33 30 30 7 8 85 95 67 5 4 131 99 82 8
260 * 31 35 71 62 41 33 39 39 30 30 78 88 99 73 59 121 88 79 7
265 * 3 0 3 3 6 1 5 4 4 1 3 7 4 7 4 8 3 0 3 0 7 9 9 1 10 4 7 6 6 5 10 2 7 6 7 6 T
270 * 30 32 S 1 46 39 42 5 7 61 33 30 80 97 109 74 74 82 66 74 7
275 * 3 0 3 1 4 3 4 2 3 7 4 9 6 9 7 5 3 3 3 0 7 9 10 1 11 1 8 0 8 0 6 7 b 1 7 1 7
280 * 30 30 37 38 36 54 80 86 36 31 80 105 105 76 87 5 8 58 69 7
285 ~ 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 S 9 8 8 9 3 4 0 3 2 8 1 11 2 9 8 7 2 9 6 S 1 S 6 6 9 7
290 * 3 0 3 0 3 2 3 2 3 2 6 3 9 2 9 5 4 5 3 2 8 3 11 9 8 3 6 9 10 0 4 9 S 6 7 0 7
295 • 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 2 6 5 9 4 9 4 4 9 3 3 8 6 12 5 6 9 7 3 10 7 4 9 5 7 7 3 T
300 * 30 30 3 1 31 31 66 93 92 52 34 92 128 62 77 11 1 49 58 74 7
305 * 30 30 31 31 31 65 90 87 54 37 96 127 57 85 11 2 49 58 75 7
3
310 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 6 3 8 6 8 S S 6 3 9 9 9 12 4 5 S 9 6 11 t 4 9 S 9 T 7 7
315 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 6 2 8 4 8 3 5 6 4 2 10 4 12 1 6 2 10 7 11 2 4 9 5 9 7 9 8
320 * 3 1 31 30 31 3 1 61 81 80 56 44 109 11 6 63 11 0 11 0 49 b 1 81 8
325 itr 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 1 3 1 6 0 8 0 7 6 5 5 L 6 11 2 11 6 7 1 11 4 10 4 4 7 6 8
330 * 31 31 31 30 30 61 79 77 55 46 11 9 11 3 80 11 6 10 1 44 6c 8
335 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 6 2 7 8 7 6 5 4 4 7 12 6 11 S 8 8 11 S 9 7 4 0 6 1 9
340 33 33 32 30 30 64 77 77 56 48 130 11 1 99 11 2 91 36 57 92 9
345 * 35 37 36 30 30 67 77 7 9 57 50 133 114 107 106 86 32 50 91 9
350 * 4 1 45 44 30 30 69 TT 86 64 56 130 109 108 98 81 30 44 83 8
355 * S 2 58 57 31 30 72 80 96 74 66 116 100 103 91 76 30 36 71 6
360 ° 67 7 7 76 34 30 73 84 106 85 78 99 89 96 87 72 30 32 58 5
*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
MAX* 126125113105 10312311 5 121 1169813312811311 611 2139134 13710397
DEGR* 165 115 95 135 110 75 30 10 SS 25 345 300 195 330 305 250 205 185 185 215
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 13 90 PPM AT 250 OEGREES FRON REC16
4
PINMIATC CAL3QHC LiNE SO1RCE DISPERSION HODEL VERSIQN 2 0 JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1
JOB Pines & Misston PM Peak Alt C 96 RUN Pines 8Mtssian Base 1946 Alt C
pATE 03/30/95 TIME 15 43
SITE 8 METEORQLOGICAL VARIABLES
vs = 0 0 cM/s w= 0 0 cM/s zo = 175 cM
U= 1 0 M/S CLAS = 5(E) ATIM = 60 MFNUTES MIXN = 1000 M AMB = 3 0 PPM
LINK VARIABLES ~
LINK DESCRIPTJON ~ LINK COQRDINATES (FT) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPN EF H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 ~ (FT) (DEG) (GJMI) (FT) (FT) (11EH)
r - ~
i Ptnes N8 Appr * 18 0 1000 U 18 0 0 0* 1000 360 AG 1064 15 8 Q 0 44 Q
2 Pines NB Gueue " 18 Q 32 0 18 0 150 5* 119 180 AG 1316 100 0 0 0 24 0 087 6 p
3 Ptnes NB A LT * 0 0 32 Q 0 0 193 3* 161 180 AG 1006 100 0 0 Q 12 0 1 41 8 Z
4 Ptnes NB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 500 0* SOQ 360 AG 1447 15 8 0 Q 44 0
5 Ptnes SB Appr ° 30 0 500 0 30 0 0 0* 500 180 AG 1741 15 8 0 0 44 0
6 Pines SB Aueue * 30 0 43 0 30 0 181 9* 134 360 AG 1060 100 0 0 Q 24 0 0 90 7 1
7 Pines Se 0 LT 1 0 0 43 0 U 0 92 8* 50 360 AG 878 100 0 0 a 12 Q 0 77 2 5
8 Ptnes SB aLT 2* 12 0 43 0 12 0 92 8* 50 360 AG 878 100 d 0 0 12 0 0 77 2 5
4 Ptnes S8 Depart * 30 0 4 0 30 0 7000 0* 1000 180 AG 1366 15 8 0 D 44 0
10 Missian EB Appr * 1000 Q 6 0 0 0 6 0¢ lOQO 90 AG 381 18 4 0 0 31 0
11 Mission EB Gueue * 52 0 6 0 98 7 6 0* 47 270 AG 896 100 0 0 0 11 0 Q 78 2 G
12 Mission EB THR Q* 52 0 17 0 147 8 17 0 * 96 270 AG 859 100 0 0 Q 11 0 0 44 4 9
13 Mtssion EB Qepart* 0 a 11 0 1000 p 11 0* 1000 90 AG 364 18 4 fl 0 45 d
14 Ntssian 4JB Appr * 1000 0 11 0 Q 0 11 0"' 1000 270 AG 603 18 4 0 Q 42 0
15 Mission WB Queue * 40 Q 11 0 73 8 17 0° 34 90 AG 1792 100 0 Q 0 22 0 0 64 1 7
16 Mission RT Queue * 40 0 28 0 123 8 28 0* 84 90 AG 739 100 0 0 0 14 0 0 81 4 3
17 Mission WB Depart* 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0* 1000 270 AG 405 18 4 0 0 42 0
1
PAGE 2
JOB Pines & P4issian PM Peak Alt C 96' RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt C
DATE 03/30/95 TIME 15 43
ADbITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS
LINlC DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARR[VAL
* LENGTH TIMF LOST TIME VOL FLOti! RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE
~ (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr)
*
2 Pines NB Cueue * 60 36 2 0 1028 1775 409 00 2 3
3 Pines NB 0 LT * 60 55 2 0 41 1744 409 00 2 3
6 Ptnes SB Oueue * 60 29 2 0 1407 1736 409 00 2 3
7 Pines SB a L7 1 * 60 48 2 0 167 1531 409 00 2 3
8 P t nes SB Q LT 2 60 48 2 0 167 1631 409 OQ 2 3
11 Nission EB Oueue * 60 44 2 0 149 1652 409 QO 2 3
12 Misston EB TWR 0 * 60 47 2 0 232 1652 409 00 2 3
15 Mission VB Queue * 60 49 2 0 253 1701 409 00 2 3
16 Mzssion RT Oueue * 60 40 2 0 350 1621 409 00 2 3
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
1
* COORDINATES (FT) *
RECEPTOR * X Y Z *
# *
1 REC 1(NW CORNER) 54 0 187 0 6 0 *
2 REC 2(N41 CORNER) * 54 0 89 0 6 0
3 REC 3(NU CORNER) 56 0 25 0 6 0 *
4 REC 4(NU CORNER) ° 120 0 23 0 6 0 *
5 REC 5 (N41 CORNER) * 219 0 23 0 6 0 *
6 REC 6(SU CORNER) * 219 0 34 0 6 0 *
T REC 7(SW CORNER) * 120 0 34 0 6 0 *
8 REC 8(SW CORNER) * 56 0 36 0 6 0 *
9 REC 9((SW CORNER) ~ 54 0 100 0 6 0 *
10 REC 10 (SE CORNER) * 54 0 199 0 6 0 *
11 REC 11 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 199 0 6 0 *
12 REC 12 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 100 0 6 0 *
13 REC 13 (SE CORNER) * 44 0 36 0 6 0 *
14 REC 14 (SE CORNER) * 108 0 34 0 6 0 *
15 REC 15 (SE CORNER) 207 0 34 0 6 0 *
16 REC 16 (NE CORNER) ' 207 0 45 0 6 0 '
17 REC 17 (NE CORNER) * 108 0 45 0 6 0 *
18 REC 18 (NE CORNER) * 44 0 47 0 6 0 '
19 REC 19 (NE CORNER) * 42 0 111 0 6 0 *
20 REC 20 (NE CORNER) * 42 0 210 0 6 0 *
1
PAGE 3
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt C 96' RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt C
MOOEL RESULTS
REMARKS in search of the angle corresponding to
the maxirman concentration only the first
angle of the angles with same maximun
concentrations is indicated as maximum
WIND ANGLE RANGE 0 360
WIND ' CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
*
0 * 4 3 5 3 S 8 3 1 3 0 3 4 5 7 9 1 7 1 6 4 8 1 7 2 T 7 4 S 3 5 3 0 3 1 4 2 4
S ' 4 7 6 3 7 0 3 3 3 0 3 4 6 1 9 8 7 8 7 4 6 3 6 3 7 8 4 4 3 5 3 0 3 0 3 8 3
10 * 4 9 7 2 8 2 3 6 3 0 3 5 6 6 10 3 7 8 7 6 5 1 S 7 7 6 4 2 3 5 3 0 3 0 3 4 3
15 * 5 1 8 0 8 9 3 9 3 1 3 6 7 0 10 1 7 4 8 1 4 2 5 1 T 7 4 0 3 S 3 0 3 0 3 2 3
20 * 50 86 93 43 33 37 77 93 72 84 39 48 75 39 35 30 30 31 3
25 * S 0 87 95 47 34 40 84 85 68 91 36 45 72 3 7 35 30 30 31 3
30 * 4 9 8 7 9 6 5 0 3 5 4 1 9 1 7 6 6 6 9 1 3 3 4 0 6 8 3 6 3 S 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
35 ' 4 7 8 6 9 4 5 3 3 6 4 2 9 6 6 S 6 9 9 2 3 2 3 7 6 1 3 6 3 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
40 ~ 4 6 8 3 9 3 S 6 3 8 4 4 10 0 6 2 7 S 8 8 3 2 3 5 5 6 3 S 3 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
45 * 46 82 93 5 7 39 47 102 58 81 83 32 34 52 36 36 30 30 30 3
50 * 4 5 7 9 8 9 6 0 4 2 5 1 10 2 5 9 8 6 7 6 3 2 3 3 4 7 3 6 3 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
55 * 4 S 7 8 8 4 6 1 4 3 S S 10 3 6 0 8 4 7 1 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 6 3 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
60 ° 44 7 6 79 63 46 58 101 65 83 66 32 33 41 37 37 30 30 30 3
2
3 p 3 p 3
3 4 3 9 3 g 3 8 3 0 3 0 3 p 3
6 7 8 3 63 3 2 ~ 4 3 q 3 a 3 8 3 ~ 3 fl 3 a 3
6 3 4 8 62 9 9 6 7 8 2 5$ 32 g,~ 3 a 3 9 34 3 1 3~ 32 3
e4 4 77 73 5 0 6 5 93 7 9 5 5 3 2 32 3 9 39 39 3 3 36 3
65 6 7 6 4 86 b g 32 3 4 39 ~ 3 3
~ 43 7b 63 55 75 6 8 g0 32 38 35 35 41
~ t4 4 7 8 ba 65 5 7 7 2 6 $ 7 g 4 7 30 3 2 3 7 3 7 35 37 3 7 4 7 3
80 . 45 65 b0 71 la 78 45 30 35 35 37 3g 52
t 47 a$ 6 q bb 64 65 76 '43 34 3~ 33 33 39 56 3
85 7 5 6 5 b 2 71 3 0 30 3 ~ 3 8 3
90 ~ 4 9 9 5 6 8 5 9 7 3 7 6 4? 3 ~ 3 1 3 1 3 7 3 9 6 0
4 100 75 6 b 6 3 Tp 55 6~ 7~ ~,4 ~p 30 34 3~ 31 3~ 37 40 63 3
95 * 57 103 71 b7 73 5 8 72 74 4 a 30 3
3p 30 0 30 36
105 41 65 3
100 ~p9 6 6 7 4 7 ~ 6~ 7 6 Gp 33 0 0 3 ~ 3p 30 3 6 3
~ 6 3 7 1 5 0 7 3 3 Q 4 3 6 7
60 30 3
110 " b 8 11 5 8 0 6 9 4 6 7 a 7 1 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 b 4 5 7 2
e 71 120 69 6 6 43 59 6g 41 30 30 30 34 48 76 3
115 * 75 12 2 Sq 8 4 0
b 57 7a 30 30 3 p 3 0 30 36 5 0 g 0 4
~
120 ~ g0 117 65 $ Q 5 q 2 3g 54 74 b b 5 3 4 4 1 2 3~ 30 3p 30 30 36 5 1 85 4
125 6b 9 3 51 79 30 30 30 35 4
t g3 115 48 36 6 1 43 30 3U 53 89
78 30 30 3 0 3 0 34 35 5 4 q t 4
130 q 1 10 9 73 g2 47 7 b 3
.
135 gd 89 4 4 3 6 43 75 5 30 3 0 34 35
r q 8 10 3 4 Q 3 5 5 4 4 4 3 1 3 1 3 p 3 0 3 4 3 5 5 4 q 4
140 5
* 10 4 100 g 4 g 2 39 35 4 2 7 1 52 45 3 1 30 54 9 4 5
145 g7 75 40 6'~ 31 31 30 34 6
150 * 11 2 10~ b$ 39 35 63 52 48 32 33 30 34 54 q8
35 3 9 51 49 32 37 30 30 55 10 4
7 $7 3q 5 9
* 12p 9 g 5 6 2
155 8 35 34
~ 12 3 9 3 5 8 38 3 4 3 5 51 4 9 3 5 4 5 31 3 0 5 7 11 0 g
160 7
g2 7 7 4~ 3'~ g
« 12 3 40 3 7 3 3 3 4 4 4 7 3 5 6 3 3 3 0 6 p 11 8
g
165 79 57 36 5042 46 32 36
70 * 11 2 8 3 5 5 3 5 3 1 4~ ~ 4 4 ~ 5 3 7 A 3 5 3 7 6 5 11 9
75 7 5 34 34 33 40 39 45 37 32 72 8
175 « 9 8 5 2
71 31 3g 48 b~ 34 38 7
« 81 67
6 8 3 0 7 44 34 3~ 34 35 35 69 46 38 39 78 100
lao
185 " 63 5 3 bb 48 3~ 30 30 32 33 3~ 77 105 4~ 35 40 gq 86 7
190 «~4 Sp 65 47 34 30 30 31 200 31 31 45 87 10g PAGE 4
195 ` 40 ~b bb 4 b 3 4 30 30
* 7 C
245 3 piRes & Mission Base 1996 A1t
Ruu
~ ~ 96
d08 Pines & Miss~on PM Peak Alt
13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REG18 REC
* CONCENTRATiON REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC 4? 4 6 7 3 7
W1ND ~ (PPM} REC7 REC8 3 5 7
p 6 4
REC4 RECS RECb 9 3 11 p 4 9 10
ANGLE REC2 REC3 3 1 4 3 3 4 44 S
3 1 q g 10 g ~ ~ 10 8 5 9
(DEGR)* REC1 3 p 4 4
* 44 34 34 3p 31 31 42 ~p~ 106 5$ 35 5Z 109 54 9
35 44 68 42 34 30 30 3~ 3~ 3 1 42 102 104 62 37 Sb
215 10 a 55 9
210 ¢ 6$ 3 0 4 1 4 0 S
: 34 42 35 30 31 31 gq 65 4 4 146 5$
8 59 ~
~ 33 39 6 ~ ~ 35 30 3 d 3 0 30 30 4 0 14 1 98 66 105 61
220 bb 3g 30 3~ 40 10 0 47 61
* 33 3$ 35 3~ 3 0 30 3a 96 66 t4a
225 33 3b ~4 3T 36 30 3~ 34 ~Q 9 8 9 3 Gb 5~ b3 94 (,5
230 61 37 30 3~ 34 95 51 bb
« 3 2 3~ 3 7 3 d 3 0 30 91 6 3 8 6 b 7
235 g7 37 30 30 39 9 3 54 70
24g 240 * 32 33 37 37 30 30 30 3~ 92 g9 6 5 T 2 81 68
SZ 38 3 0 30 30 40 9 1 6 b 55 7 ~
,32 ;3 3 8
48 3p 31
4 p 4 2
42 65 S b 7 3 bb
: 32 34 39 3p 30 30
3 9 70
255 250 45 34 ~ ~ 33 4 x 93 6 1 63
~ 32 34 3q 3y 3~ 3~ 92 bb 64 78
33
260 7 6
~ 63 b p ~ 8 64 g1
* 32 33 4 2 40 33 3 4 7 2 3~ 30 4 5 9 6 9 b 5 5 2
48 32 3~ 4 b q 4 b 5 8 6 b'1 46 62 83
270 2b5 32 4 g 4 3 0 9 3a 34 3 3 5 7 5 1
~ 34 3x 3 ~ 3 a 3g 35 3~ 5 3 10 Q 77 59 7a 4 5 Sq g4
b7 ~
275 * 3~ 30 3 3 7 5 35 33 33 7 7 4 4 p 2 5 b 5 1 34 32 54 103 60 bb 67 44 57 8
284 33 33 44 65 57 ip7 6
285 « 30 30 32 32 3~ 33 6 6 47 6 $ 33 32
290 * ~0 3o 31 31 295
3
300 * 30 30 31 31 31 35 49 71 34 32 60 11 2 58 75 66 41 54 85 5
305 * 30 30 31 31 31 35 52 73 36 32 62 11 2 55 83 62 39 S 1 83 5
310 ° 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 5 4 7 4 3 7 3 2 6 8 11 4 5 7 9 0 5 6 3 8 4 8 7 9 S
315 " 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 S 5 7 5 4 0 3 3 7 3 11 2 6 3 9 3 5 0 3 7 4 6 T 7 S
320 * 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 G S 6 7 6 4 3 3 4 8 1 11 4 6 9 8 9 4 5 3 6 4 3 S
325 * 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 S 7 7 S 4 S 3 5 8 9 11 2 T 5 8 3 4 3 3 6 4 1 5
330 * 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 5 7 7 4 4 7 3 6 9 6 11 2 8 1 7 5 4 0 3 5 4 0 5
335 * 31 31 31 30 30 34 57 74 48 38 105 11 1 82 67 GO 33 39 59 S
340 * 32 32 31 30 30 34 57 74 51 40 113 106 84 60 38 32 38 56 5
345 * 33 34 33 30 30 34 5 7 76 52 43 113 101 85 56 37 31 36 53 S
350 * 35 37 38 30 30 34 56 78 56 48 108 91 81 52 36 30 34 SO 4
355 ~ 38 45 47 30 30 34 57 84 63 56 99 80 80 48 35 30 33 46 4
360 * 43 53 58 31 30 34 57 91 71 64 81 72 77 45 35 30 31 42 4
.
1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
14AX* 123 12296937375 103 103869211 311 411 093707310911 99383
DEGR* 160 120 30 130 105 75 SS 10 SO 35 340 310 210 315 285 265 225 190 230 200
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION 1S 12 30 PPM AT 160 DEGREES FROM REC1
4
PINMIATD CAL30HC LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL VERSION 2 0 JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1
JOB Pines & Misston PM Peak Alt D 96 RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt D
DATE 03/31/95 TIME 13 27
SITE & HETEOROIOGICAL VARIABLES
VS = 0 0 CH/S VD = 0 0 CM/S ZO = 175 CM
U= 1 0 M/S CLAS = 5(E) AT1N = 60 MiNUTES MIXH = 1000 M AMB = 3 0 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
L1NK DESCRlPTION * LINK COORDINATES (FT) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C OUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (FT) (DEG) (G/MI) (FT) (FT) (VEH)
• *
1 Pines NB Appr * 18 0 1000 0 18 0 0 0* 1000 360 AG 1108 15 8 0 0 44 0
2 Pines NB Queue ° 18 0 32 0 18 0 122 3* 90 180 AG 1046 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 65 4 6
3 Pines NB Q LT * 0 0 32 0 0 0 44 3° 12 180 AG 928 100 0 0 0 12 0 0 26 0 6
4 Pines NB Depart * 18 0 0 0 18 0 500 0* 500 360 AG 1550 15 8 0 0 44 0
S Pines S8 Appr ° 30 0 500 0 30 0 0 0* 500 180 AG 1834 15 8 0 0 44 0
b Ptnes SB Queue 30 0 43 0 30 0 135 3* 92 360 AG 810 100 0 0 0 24 0 0 71 4 7
7 Ptnes SB G LT 1* 0 0 43 0 0 0 99 2°' 56 360 AG 810 100 0 0 0 12 0 0 66 2 9
8 Ptnes SB C LT 2* 12 0 43 0 12 0 148 2* 105 360 AG 878 100 0 0 0 12 0 0 98 5 3
9 Pines SB Depart * 30 0 0 0 30 0 1000 0* 1000 180 AG 1370 15 8 0 0 44 0
10 Mission EB Appr * 1000 0 b 0 0 d 6 0* 1000 90 AG 363 18 4 0 0 31 0
11 Mission EB Oueue * 52 0 6 0 91 9 6 0* 40 270 AG 827 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 49 2 0
12 Mission EB THR G* 52 0 17 0 107 0 17 0* SS 270 AG 793 100 0 0 0 11 0 0 60 2 8
13 Mission EB Depart * 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0* 1000 90 AG 661 18 4 0 0 45 0
14 Misston WB Appr * 1000 0 11 0 0 0 11 0* 1000 270 AG 740 18 4 0 0 42 0
15 Mission WB Queue ° 40 0 lt 0 85 0 11 0* 45 90 AG 1654 100 0 0 0 22 0 0 54 2 3
16 Hission RT Queue * 40 0 28 0 126 1 28 0* 88 90 AG 675 100 0 0 0 14 0 0 77 4 S
17 Mission t18 Depart * 0 0 11 0 1000 0 11 0° 1000 270 AG 437 18 4 0 0 42 0
1
PAGE 2
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt D 96' RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt D
DATE 03l31/95 TIME 13 27
ADDITIONAL GUEUE L1NK PARAMETERS
LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARR[VAl
* LENGTH TIME IOST TIME VOL F1041 RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE
* (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (YPH) (VPM) (gm/hr)
*
2 Pines NB Oueue 65 31 2 0 1067 1764 409 00 2 3
3 Pines NB 0 LT " 65 55 2 0 41 1744 409 00 2 3
b Pines SB Queue * 65 24 2 0 1407 1736 409 00 2 3
7 Pines SB Q LT 1 * 65 48 2 0 214 1631 409 00 2 3
8 Pines SB C LT 2 * 60 48 2 0 213 1631 409 00 2 3
11 Mission EB Queue * 65 49 2 0 149 1664 409 00 2 3
12 Mission EB THR 0 * 65 47 2 0 214 1664 409 00 2 3
15 Mtssion W6 Queue * 65 49 2 0 337 1699 409 00 2 3
16 Mission RT Queue * 65 40 2 0 403 1621 409 00 2 3
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
1
° COORDINATES (FT) *
RECEPTOR * X Y Z *
• *
1 REC 1(NW CORNER) * 54 0 187 0 6 0 *
2 REC 2(NW CORNER) * 54 0 $9 0 6 0 *
3 REC 3(NW CORNER) ' 56 0 25 0 6 0 *
4 REC 4(NW CORNER) * 120 0 23 0 6 0 *
S REC S(Ntd CORNER) ~ 219 0 23 0 6 0 *
6 REC 6(SW CORNER) ° 219 0 34 0 G 0 *
7 REC 7(S41 CORNER) * 120 0 34 0 6 0 *
8 REC 8(S41 CORNER) * 56 0 36 0 6 0 °
9 REC 9((SW CORNER) ° 54 0 100 0 6 0 *
10 REC 10 (SE CORNER) * 54 0 199 0 6 0 °
11 REC 11 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 199 0 6 0 *
12 REC 12 (SE CORNER) * 42 0 100 0 6 0 *
13 REC 13 (SE CORNER) 44 0 36 0 6 0 *
14 REC 14 (SE CORNER) * 108 0 34 0 6 0 *
15 REC 15 (SE CORNER) ' 207 0 34 0 6 0 *
16 REC 16 (NE CORNER) * 207 0 45 0 6 0 *
17 REC 17 (NE CORNER) ° 108 0 45 0 6 0 TM
18 REC 1$ (NE CORNER) * 44 0 47 0 6 0 *
19 REC 19 (NE CORNER) * 42 0 111 0 6 0 *
20 REC 20 (NE CORNER) * 42 0 210 0 6 0
1
PAGE 3
J08 Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt D 96' RUN Pines & Mission Base 1996 Alt D
MOOEL RESULTS
REMARKS In search of the angle correspondtng to
the maximum concentration only the first
angle of the angles aith same maxtmun
concentrations is indicated as maximurn
WIND ANGLE RANGE 0 360
WIND ° CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR); REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
~
0 * 4 3 4 7 S 2 3 1 3 0 3 4 3 6 8 S 6 8 6 0 7 0 7 2 7 8 4 8 3 7 3 0 3 1 4 2 4
5 * 4 8 5 3 6 3 3 4 3 0 3 4 3 8 9 3 7 G 6 9 5 9 6 S 7 7 4 6 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 8 3
10 ~ S 0 S 7 7 5 3 5 3 0 3 5 4 2 9 8 7 5 7 0 5 2 S 8 7 6 4 4 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 4 3
15 * 51 62 84 37 31 36 48 97 73 71 42 55 78 43 37 30 30 32 3
20 * 5 1 6 7 8 9 4 0 3 3 3 T 5 3 9 3 7 2 7 2 3 9 S 2 7 9 4 1 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 1 3
25 * 5 1 7 1 9 3 4 3 3 4 3 9 6 1 8 S 6 6 7 2 3 6 4 8 7 7 4 0 3 7 3 Q 3 0 3 1 3
30 * 5 0 7 6 9 4 4 5 3 5 4 0 6 9 7 6 6 3 6 9 3 4 4 3 7 5 4 0 3 8 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
35 * 49 80 94 49 37 42 77 68 66 66 32 34 72 39 38 30 30 30 3
40 * 4 7 8 4 4 3 S 3 3 8 4 4 8 4 6 1 7 0 6 1 3 2 3 7 6 6 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
45 * 4 6 8 5 9 1 5 8 3 9 4 8 8 8 5 9 7 2 5 6 3 3 3 5 6 2 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
50 '4 6 8 6 8 5 6 0 3 9 4 9 9 0 5 9 7 3 S 2 3 4 3 5 S 6 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
55 * 4 5 8 6 8 2 6 2 4 1 5 1 9 2 6 1 T 1 4 8 3 4 3 5 5 0 3 9 3 9 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
60 * 4 5 8 6 7 5 6 4 4 S 5 6 9 3 6 6 7 0 4 b 3 4 3 6 G 6 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 z^ 3
2
65 * 44 85 71 62 48 5 9 93 70 65 45 34 36 44 42 41 30 30 30 3
70 * 4 4 8 4 6 7 6 4 S 0 5 9 9 0 6 9 6 4 4 4 3 4 3 6 4 4 4 2 4 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
75 * 4 4 8 5 6 7 6 3 5 4 b 5 8 b 7 2 6 2 4 3 3 2 3 6 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
80 * 4 4 8 7 6 8 6 5 5 9 6 3 7 9 7 1 6 3 4 2 3 2 3 S 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 2 3 3 3
85 ° 44 92 74 68 62 6 2 70 68 60 42 31 34 43 44 43 34 34 37 3
90 * 4 S 9 7 7 9 7 0 6 5 5 8 6 2 6 6 5 7 4 0 3 0 3 2 4 0 4 0 4 Q 3 6 3 7 4 2 3
95 4 4 6 10 0 7 9 7 1 6 6 5 1 S 6 6 4 5 5 4 0 3 0 3 1 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 9 3 9 4 9 3
100 A 46 103 76 69 64 47 51 61 52 40 30 30 34 34 34 L 1 42 SS 3
105 * 47 108 72 68 62 40 48 58 50 40 30 30 31 32 32 41 43 61 3
110 * 4 9 11 3 6 b 7 0 5 8 3 8 4 7 5 7 4 7 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 1 4 0 4 3 6 4 3
115 * 5 0 11 S 6 0 7 2 5 3 3 7 4 5 S 7 4 5 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 4 5 6 9 3
120 * 53 114 59 75 50 36 43 57 43 40 30 30 30 30 30 39 46 72 3
125 * 57 11 4 62 75 4G 35 41 56 G2 41 30 30 30 30 30 38 48 77 3
130 * 63 108 60 76 G2 34 40 56 43 42 30 30 30 30 30 38 50 81 3
135 ~ 7 1 10 1 6 6 7 3 4 1 3 S 3 4 5 4 4 2 4 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 38 5 3 8 5 4
140 * 7 9 9 8 6 6 6 T 4 0 3 5 3 8 S 2 4 3 4 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 7 S 4 8 8 4
145 * 88 88 68 64 40 35 37 49 44 44 30 30 30 30 30 37 SS 92 4
150 ' 9 5 B 6 6 6 S 9 4 0 3 5 3 8 4 8 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 7 5 6 9 3 4
155 * 100 83 66 5 S 39 35 38 48 46 46 31 31 30 30 30 37 56 94 S
160 * 10 2 T 6 6 6 5 0 3 4 3 5 3 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 7 5 6 9 4 S
165 ' 10 0 T 2 6 b 4 7 3 9 3 4 3 8 4 9 L 9 4 9 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 0 3 0 3 7 5 6 9 3 6
170 ° 92 70 68 45 37 33 37 49 SO 49 35 35 35 30 30 37 56 95 6
175 * 83 64 69 42 35 31 36 48 49 47 38 39 41 31 30 37 57 96 6
180 * 70 60 68 38 34 30 33 43 44 44 G3 43 48 33 30 37 54 94 7
185 * 58 55 65 35 34 30 31 39 40 39 46 47 ST 35 32 39 62 100 7
190 * 4 7 5 1 6 3 3 4 3 4 3 0 3 0 3 4 3 S 3 S 4 8 4 8 b 4 3 7 3 2 b 0 6 b 9 9 7
195 * 4 0 4 7 6 3 3 4 3 4 3 0 3 0 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 8 4 9 6 9 3 8 3 4 4 1 7 0 9 1 7
200 ~ 36 4 5 64 34 34 30 30 31 31 31 46 49 7 4 38 34 41 76 80 6
205 * 35 42 64 34 34 30 30 31 31 31 45 51 77 39 35 42 82 73 6
1
PAGE 6
JOB Pines 8 Mission PM Peak Alt 0 96' RUN Pines 8 Mission Base 1996 Alt D
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGIE * (PPM)
(DEGR)° REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 RECS REC6 RECT RECB REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 REC15 REC16 REC17 REC18 REC
4
210 * 3 3 3 8 6 4 3 5 3 5 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 L 3 5 1 7 7 4 0 3 5 4 2 9 0 6 4 7
215 4 33 36 63 35 35 30 30 30 31 31 43 54 77 40 34 42 95 58 7
220 ° 33 36 61 35 35 30 30 30 31 31 42 56 76 41 34 43 101 56 8
225 * 33 34 57 35 35 30 30 30 31 31 42 59 75 44 34 46 107 SS 8
230 * 33 34 52 35 35 30 30 30 30 30 40 60 72 47 35 44 109 SS 8
235 * 3 2 3 3 4 9 3 6 3 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 6 3 7 2 4 4 3 6 5 2 10 8 S S 8
240 * 3 2 3 3 4 5 3 7 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 6 S 7 2 5 0 3 7 5 5 10 8 5 8 8
245 * 32 33 42 38 38 30 30 30 30 30 39 66 71 5 1 4 0 60 100 59 8
250 * 3 2 3 3 4 0 3 8 3 8 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 9 6 7 T 0 5 2 4 2 6 7 9 0 6 1 8
255 * 32 33 40 39 39 30 30 30 30 30 39 67 72 52 42 69 84 62 7
260 * 3 1 3 3 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 0 3 0 3 9 6 8 7 6 S 6 4 6 7 2 7 T 6 S 7
265 * 3 0 3 3 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 4 Q 6 9 7 T 5 5 4 9 6 9 6 9 6 4 7
270 * 30 32 34 39 34 34 34 36 32 30 40 71 80 57 56 63 6 5 72 7
275 * 30 31 37 38 37 36 36 40 32 30 40 71 80 62 63 59 62 76 6
280 30 30 35 36 36 36 36 43 32 31 41 TO 78 58 68 S S 60 77 6
285 ' 30 30 33 33 33 36 36 48 33 32 41 72 72 61 71 48 61 79 6
290 * 30 30 32 32 32 36 36 52 33 32 G1 75 66 63 72 46 60 80 6
295 * 30 30 31 32 32 36 36 5 7 33 32 41 74 54 70 71 42 58 83 5
3
300 * 30 30 31 31 31 36 36 61 33 32 42 83 56 79 71 39 55 84 S
305 * 30 30 31 31 31 35 35 63 32 32 42 85 55 88 64 38 51 84 5
310 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 3 4 6 6 3 3 3 2 4 3 8 6 6 0 9 7 5 8 3 6 4 7 8 3 5
315 * 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 3 4 6 8 3 5 3 3 4 8 8 7 6 3 10 1 S 3 3 6 4 3 7 9 4
320 * 31 31 30 31 31 34 34 69 37 33 49 90 68 97 49 36 42 4
325 ° 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 4 3 G 7 0 3 8 3 3 5 6 9 3 7 7 9 3 4 S 3 6 4 0 f 4
330 * 31 31 31 30 30 34 34 70 41 34 59 96 81 84 44 35 39 64 4
335 " 31 31 31 30 30 34 34 70 44 35 68 98 84 75 4 2 33 39 60 5
340 * 3 2 3 2 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 4 3 4 7 1 4 7 3 6 T 3 9 9 8 S 6 7 G 0 3 2 3 8 5 6 S
345 * 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 4 3 4 7 1 5 0 4 1 8 2 9 4 8 S 6 1 3 9 3 1 3 6 5 4 5
350 ° 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 0 3 0 3 4 3 4 7 3 5 3 4 4 8 2 8 8 8 2 5 6 3 8 3 0 3 4 5 1 5
355 * 38 41 43 30 30 34 35 79 60 54 81 79 81 52 37 30 33 47 4
360 * 4 3 G 7 5 2 3 1 3 0 3 4 3 6 8 5 b 8 6 0 7 0 7 2 7 8 4 8 3 7 3 0 3 1 4 2 4
*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
MAX * 10 2 11 5 9 4 T 6 6 6 6 5 9 3 9 8 7 5 7 2 8 2 9 9 8 5 10 1 T 2 7 2 10 9 10 0 8 9 8 2
DEGR* 160 115 30 130 95 75 60 10 10 20 345 340 340 315 290 260 230 185 235 200
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 11 SO PPM AT 115 DEGREES FRQA1 REC2
4
7
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
June 28, 1995
W.O. No. 95574
John Pederson
Spokane County Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
RE: Lawson Proposed Hotel/Office Complex at Pines & Mission
Dear Mr. Pederson:
In a conversations with Greg Figg of the WSDOT Planning Department on May 16, 1995, I
requested the traffic information regarding the R. A. Hanson site. I was on a tight time line on
this project, and was assured by Greg that he could give me the information by Thursday, May
18, 1995 at noon so that I could include it in my study. I did not receive this information, and
therefore this project was not included specifically in the traffic study.
In the WSDOT comments on the study, mention is made to the lack of information pertaining
to the R. A. Hanson project, however, no traffic data is included, although it had been previously
requested and had been assured was available.
As you are aware, this project is on the hearing examiner committee agenda for July 20, 1995,
and therefore, we continue to work on a tight time line. I will include the traffic from Phase
I of R. A. Hanson if WSDOT will supply me with the traffic information which they are aware
I need, and which they have assured me they have.
As I have explained, I need this information in a timely manner. If WSDOT can not or will not
provide me with it, I am asking to be relieved from answering this concern. As explained in
the traffic study, R.A. Hanson will build out after this project is completed, therefore, although
it has been asked to be included as a background project, the Lawson Hotel/Office building will
actually be completed first.
If you have any question, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Ann L. Winkler, P. E.
FitCElVED
cc: Greg Figg, WSDOT Planning
Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers J(1 L 0 ~isd5
Glenn Miles, SRTC
• _ . ~^~r~.r.~R
707 West 7th . Suite 200
Spokane, Washington 99204
509-458-6840
FAX: 509-458-6844
~
Washington State Eastern Region
Department of "i~ransportation 2714 N. Mayfair Stree[
, Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Sid Morrison
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000
June 121 1995 J U N 15 199~
Mr. John Pederson -n'►r',`Ty
Spokane County Planning
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re: Lawson Proposed Hotel/Offce
Complex at Pines Road and Missian
Avenue
: Dear Mr. Pederson:
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above referenced traffic study. After
reviewing this study, we have several concerns regarding this traffic study and the
results that were reached.
We would ask that these specific concerns be addressed by the applicant prior to this
i»atter beina placed on the public hearing agenda. Page 3- The study makes mention of the R.A. Hanson project. The R.A. Hanson
project was approved by Spokane County in the late 1980's. More recently this project
was before County Planning for a time extension, which has been granted. By the
actions of Spokane County Planning it appears this is still a viable project and needs to
be considered. It is our understanding that the project is currently approved for Phase I
which consists of up to 650,000 square feet of retail area plus a 300 unit hotel/motel.
Construction of Phase I of this project would contribute traffic to both the Pines and
Sullivan corridors. The distribution of this traffic is described in the environmental
documentation prepared for the project. Due to the size limit of this development, the
Evergreen Interchange will not be constructed at this time. The improvements that will
be provided with the R.A. Hanson project, consistent with the conditions of approval,
inciude the widening of the intersection of SR 27/Indiana.
Page 6- The trip generation rate of a"General Office Building' is used for the Lawson
site. However, on figure #2 of the analysis, the building is listed as a RetaiUOffice
Building. If this building is to contain retail uses, a proportionate amount of the-
building should be computed using this higher rate.
Page 7- The level of service (LOS) data provided indicates that the intersections of SR
27/Mission and the SR 27 EB off ramp operate at an acceptable LOS. Upon field
review of this intersection, however, long queues of traffic are observed extending
down the EB off rarnp. This indicates a poor level of service. The ability of these
intersections to function independently as analyzed in the study is severely inhibited by
their proximity to each other. The intersections of SR 27/Indiana, EB ramps, WB
ramps, and Mission function as a coordinated system to provide traffic progression in
this area. The ability to change signal timings at each intersection is constrained by the
coordination of the system. A change to one intersection will affect either upstream or
downstream intersections. The existing signal timing needs to be used as this would
ensure the needed coordination remains intact. If the coordination is to be changed, it
needs to be changed on a system wide basis. Additionally, the capacity of the
intersection is further constrained by the limited distance to develop channelization and
the spilibacks that develop, further reducing capacity.
Figure 4- The volumes presented appear to be 1994 volumes, as they correlate very
well to WSDOT ] 994 counts.
General - In order to fully.review this traffc study we ask that the applicant provide tlle
worksheets that detail the pro~,Tression type, peak hour factor, % tnicks, bus staps, etc.
As we have stated in the above the intersections of Pines/EB OfFRanips aiid
Pines/Mission operate at a poor LOS currently and will be further impacted by the
approved but not yet built out development in this area. We realize that the cumulative
affect of this development to the transportation system can be quite extensive, and
additionally realize it is not reasonable to expect this development to mitigate these
cumulative impacts. What we do ask is that this development mitigate the probable
adverse impacts to the transportation system directly attributable to this development.
An example of this would be if an intersection is operating at LOS "F" at 68 seconds of
delay under current conditions, the appropriate mitigation would be to restore it to 68
seconds of delay with the project in place.
. .
If you have any question or need further information regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact myself or Greg Figg in our Planning Office at 324-6199.
Sincerely,
JZ~ 4~~
LEONARD CASH, PE
R~~?1(~Il~l~ P~~111i1111.~~ ~Il«,lilE~(
I.C C J~l
cc: Glenn iUliles, Spokane 1Zegional 'i fa11S})UCti1110(1 CvUllC11
Pat Harper, Spokane Countv Engineers
Ann Winkle►-, IPEC
Project tile
a~•~e~~`10
_ ~ ~ Q
• 'r
. l ~
.
y A
_
a
! T 1 ~ ~ 't ~ O~ ~
c. J~ s M Q ::i j~T~•T ~•~~r;t. 1 ,
Afth
l~►"~ y 3 ~ •t~ t + Z - 73 ~ . a~ • ~ . . . ~ ' ~
~a
. ~ ~ ~ •Q ~ QQ~ ~~j'
► Q . r-r"'t~ 2 ~7~
a s►»s3o A C .I
13 53
~ . ~ ~-'~•q•l4 ~ 7 ~ (3
.'`d y d J " t ~"'w'`~`a► t
7u ~ t G
13~,Hc3~ > .~NpQfl
D ~ 1 •
v G
7C • ~ ~ ~ S
x _ Z
r ~ ' -.4 0
3 t~'d d ~
3 ~6
► -
a.
~~„p91N
•
. •
~ Nuv H5
Q131 Nd
. • ~ ~
at
• 3nv~ tli1=~~''w
~
>
~ Q 1 1 ~~Q ~ ; o
L `•,jJ C iry
i
► ptlQp~!j1~
• 7
,uasskr
, .
_-~~~^~►~1iluo l
i
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
REzoNE FME # ZE-023-95-o;
Related File # ( )
Date to Review 07-20-95 1t 6
Date to AA & DR 04-12-95 Time 1:15
Date Received 03-30-95
Project Name UR-3.5-B2 TO B-3 200 UNIT MOTEL-REST-OFFICE BLDG No. Lots No.Acres 4.9
Range - Township - Section
SITE ADDRESS N MISSION-E PINES PARCEL # 10543-0220
;0222;0276
Applicant's Name BILL LAWSON-ROBERT BONUCELLI Phone # 924-9730
Address PO BOX 141449 Phone 2# 624-1170
SPOKANE WA 99214-1449
FLOOD ZONE NO W _ S _ School 356 Date Conditions mailed
Owner SPO VALLEY SDAA CHURCH Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's MIKE PHILLIPS
Address UPPER COLUMBIA MISSION Address SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC
Phone SOCIETY Phone / Fax 909 N ARGONNE RD
12323 E MISSION SPOKANE WA 99212
SPOKANE WA 99216 926-1322 FAX 926-1323
926-5866
Planning Contact Person BILL MOSER Phone 456-2205
Date Subnutted Description Initials I
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
HEARING EXAM l-' ApPROVED DENIED _APPEALED BBC / PROJECT _APPROVED _DENIED
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
.
. ,
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE#
Related File # ( )
Date to Review Time #
Date to AA & DR 04-12-95 Time 1:15
Date Received 03-30-95
Project Name No. Lots No.Acres 4.9
UR-3.5B2 TO B-3 240 UNIT MOTEL/REST/OFFICE BLDG
~ection - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS N MISSION/E PINES PARCEL # 10543-0220+
Applicant's Name BILL LAWSON/ROBERT BONUCELLI Phone # 924-9730
Address PO BOX 141449-SPOKANE WA 99214-1449 Work # 624-1170
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE V NO W S SCHOOL 356
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name MIKE PHILLIPS
SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC
909 N ARGONNE RD
SPOKANE WA 99212
. 926-1322 FAX 926-1323
Planning Contact Person BILL MOSER Phone # 456-2205
Date Submitted Description Initials
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED DENIED- APPEALED BBC / PROJECT APPROVED DENIED
BOND QUP.NTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
l
.
~ ~ .
I
~
ZC
,
~
.a N~ 3 ~ ~
. j
i~.
F -
-
~ _
- - -
-
" •
_ -
~
.
"
~
_ -
-
~-r'"".~
-
_ -
l
L
~
i
~
~~t 171995
, . .
. Cau~ ~i~eeti~
Z ==23=95
If A
4
MARIETYA = QvE.
~ N ~ .
l~ i `4-d
ECr
t
~ t Q. • ~ . 10
~ ~
~
Iz, ~
titAN IELD
MA Y
D
r~ o = ~'''v E~ -
- fC 1965 SN~Atr - - -i~r~t~r.►h ~
,
• " - i, - ~ `
i
1dC~K7G01~E~Y DR'
S
9G . o Y -
~
~ ~IOAA J~ ~ ~ OR' O
~ O
4 m i S 5 1 O h1 A V E~
~ ~ ~ . . . . .
~xw
. . . . . . • • ' i T = 0 ~ 1►+ T
$,~r1TG
. 0
iZ S►~~ W
. t
. ~
BOONE ~ CESwE-c~ r
o ~
r DES M ET A,v c ~ • ci
~ 2 r d~ T O~ r1 ~ p. T A' n C.
3 u. ~ ~ ~ w~L_~,GYV GT, r+
L. uo w ~ ° ~C
°0 ~ • tn. ~
g AY
> ,
. . . ~ .
' ' ` • EL 2 , ~
;,;~,~:~,;t h i • d3
av
ot / v6 A✓/ J . . .
Z - c
~ vP ~.LEv wnY
1.._ L Y W AY ~
.
21
iff-M
O • ' " F
:
x Z p ~ w,rw0N
A 1 N ' ~ r..~.~■
• S• :~Yi , ~IV
ioE s° R 1 V£RStOE
G ~ : X
~
I ,r%CT=r c,rnff PPinnrt fnrZE-23-95 Page
~i
ZE=23=95
Nr,,-A6& ~
` ~ . .
M ,IEJft; for~
" h.
t W
~I t
r r ~ ~
ufz •2 _ . ~ ^ .
- ~ ~ ~ to
q uR-35 .V Fj 22 MAN ~ELD
I I.- RRRCIO
R-a~'' .
u -7
C 1.96
~~i tr ►r o A„ Fff
UR- „ " ' i~r~t/~t~►~
c~w"r a+. 1_2 M
ao 1-2 - ~
~ lm2
i
. 'Tc3jAil
UR.ZZ ~
o - c W22 ~
UR'4833
N
1 V n,.'.a!. ~ i~ l I S S 1 QN .
~ V E.
w~2 E
. . . . . . •
. ~ N
N UR-22
URZ 0 ° UR-12
soNTO~ r z I °
INT UR-22
UR-22 2 UR•22 ~ a
U R-3.5 ~ . _ -UR,--12 ~ W
' Y
80 N E -i
BI -
o t`- < D E 5 M E'~ ~ r ~ C]
~ 2 or.•. . ,DE T u AV E
0 t ~ A.r~°L CS CATALDU
~
Q
6u /raI►L.(.OrY CT. ~
J d
r ' 8-3 ~ UR - n. ~
lhht ~ UR-22 22 > B A Y Z
. . , , , . . . .
UR_
22 ~o~ j,~:'►' . ~ E L ru ~ m
r.•ti. c~ _ , UR_22 ~
..Pi~net'~J1~nior UR•7:
- K 1 ~.';H' ~h~c~~~■ ~ Kav
~R UR- 22
&15 ~ uR-12 22 L,VE ~o ~ G UR-22 M-34
B"1 ~s'V .
_L Y wAY • uR- § - I~ LLEY W/►Y
O R• 1 xow
- ~ i
„ = o ~ R 2
AIN D of .Z . uR.7 r
W
M~I N
WON~~ ~ ~ . s.s
7/95 HEC Staff Report forZE-23-95 Yage
,
i
ZE=23='95
~ ~ ~ ~ E.f~.~F . i v • •Y:h • B1~ RT S ~ . Water Tank
! • ~ ~ ~ C~-. . r1`•-
. " t .y.~. ~ . ~ . 2`• ~ . . .
• • • ' . r• 1993 , • W ' ~r:::•:~:•:::,.~t•:
~ • •f • •
~~ti r• ~ • {r ' r?` C
; .l W Ii.' ' 0~
•
.
1• n •a•~ ••':^'~~N(3T~N ~~9 TIlHt
• a e Y~ RL ~Sch w' t,-~ ,
SION
• .«M~~...~w~~~~~~~~~.~~.• 19~ i +y..
• • • . . ~ . ~ 'ti..~•:::~ r.''~
~ ~X y}
~ •fe• Q 1'~.' ~ 1 ' k"•
n
•o•~."•w• ~ ~ ~:r~,:~
. •666•~• • . . K••.;~.~f'~,#;?:
. t+,
'N£ • • • • • • I M I . ,i'~"'
•o...:..'_..,__.. •~r!• 11060
l,• ~ a, _
•i ~ t ' . • • 0 '1~ ..~-'~i.r~'.,j, ' .
w• ' Z;~ • : ~ • ~
~ ~s'•~ I
: IN~.AND E M P I R
~ • . • ' .
, ~.1 ~apow .I
V ~ . : ~Q I O O . . . ~
• : : ~ • _ ~ ~ .
,o. ' WT
g 10
^
.
t~
hil . . . . • . . , . ,
T/O ~ ~ . . ,
. ~ • . ~ • Trailer • r '
Parw: . • wE ' Nt RNAT
.
,4e~r,p1 ~ t , ` 'BIlRLRlV~7'ON . ~ . _
_ . + r
, I
~ ~ ~ ~ . a ■ • e o , • o • • ~^;1• . .
• •
. .
• o
i;' Psrk ~
~~o
tss~on
~ Vsll P~
. . . . , - • / • , 'O oll
~ r ~1Qt~ .~~lsipn' SDOki lVall • Avf ~-T•~: 11~j
~H . ~ a .1.~ ; •
~ ei • . , ~ . . . ~ a , • P
~eIF~ Q .T'~ _,.d~ : ~ °'j~• • ~ ~ _
,
h ?2 - f i • G ~ • .
800NE t Y[ _
, >a?~b05~' - _ _ _ ,..1 _ -
I • ~ -~•a~~ -m-~~-_-. .r_r ~
1" y ~ ~ V► • y T::,. Z : . , ~ 1
_
wT 4
06q
~ , • 81.k. y , .
• - - - ~ i i il j ~ ! ~ ~ ~f ~ 9e~ ~ ~ ~I p ' ~ ~ 2
~
i _ u~ . . . _ .z: . _ ~ ~ - " ~ - -
- ~&P~ADwAr wVENt/E t
~ Sr~ 16T NoKh Piaes
- . . d , r Jr HiRh &h ~!Well+ ~ .
~ r ~ i - ::cr: 'fi ---,r--•-- ;r_ ' ~ -IOS? ~ . .
+ + ; ~--z - ' ~ r • - I,.
WAY " VAtt[r ~ wwY
; h~ EY ~i- ;r~~:s~-_,::•~.•_-.~~ _ ~ ~j ~ , i•..-`
?G2 6 . SupSLatiofl if U n ~j
~ i r PPORTUN IT!
. •N ~ - aa
'Sti ~ „ 1~~ ~~s PRAOlIE7 ' • ~ t ~ ~ A VE --2020
- - t
1 s. ~ . • •
PO• ~ • . s ?p16 .
. ~ ~!r 1•O ~
W6' ~
. . o o
E • ~I~ • ~ ~ _ 70~'~ _..t ' J ~ o St Y~s ~
~y• ' AVE t - - •TN _ A VfN(~E • • • Stll •
- . : _rr a~r. . - . • • • ~
` - 1 . _ : . , . • ,
~ ~fw,~;' = - j c
t• . _L`._ _ . - • • - ` o ~
Seb Well
P
j:• ~
I L-AYC t 21 ZZ srM i«•. ~ wve o- i~
~ . j~•1J • . . _ ' ?C1~S~ ' . . - _ . ~ t:,~ ~ or
a1 _ . _ ~ - _z- _.t _:~~o ~a~ .^,1~ . ~
~ - ~ ~i~ i _ ' ~ z•-. - L...- : a•~ ' ' 't O
_a : . TM .
. . ~
~ . • . ~ . ik L.:=~ .SZ'~~:5. ~T.2~ L - .
•
~
is ~o-r-- -•r...-~ ~..r - --...__.__..-AVENI/E •o~L )r
/?TM _ • _ • •
' _ -toeo- - • .s r . . .
~ l x . . . .
y i . '
W 1 0 - - ~ - , We11 s • ~
I , ~ 3 - ~ - WTri 106. Nrponald . • E.rgretO :
• ' " o • r H S
st~r m . P ~ - Well~.. /
k~ Th
\ ^ 20i7 • Tan~ . ~ :j. . LQ-~q .~net. ~ l , vE` ~6ra
7/95 HEC Staff Report forZE-23-95 Page
~
~
Z •
m
E23=95
water iank \
- ~
• 1 1
M?Jr lJrJ 1 T1T~~
~ _ ~ ~ , _ 1993 W titr :j ' I
~-L: - - . i • L_.,~_
.1 ~ . ~ . .
• ~ . ' ~ . ~ ~rW e I I ~ '•4~ ~ ~ . , ,
•~ri 9~' • '/GTON n-nl
' • T ~ _-B~JRL ~•h •W ~ li I
. .
° . 994
•
~ t0 ~ ~ . ~..~•i?:'.~: :~'ti; t;.:f~:
. . L. Q rJ ~1'
~ ' . . , . 'L». T.rrr
0 ~ . : v~
v~ 1` ~ ~.•~...~.~~~j •~~~~~~Il(~~~~~.• I. . j ~
~ • ,
~ , ~ ' . •,1.~~.... : 1 ( ~ ' y' •i':•
2 " 7 ~ ~ . . . - ~i 2,06 01
~ - .4.......
u I NlA N DE MF~P I-,R
' l
Zo0 9&9 .,W@
~''T ~ ~ - y_ . . - ~ ~ • • - ~ ~ ~ .
_ ~~•-•,r.. wr e 10 10°°
y ,
. . ~ . ,
/N Ll • ~ ~ .
ER A T~0
~Trai ' ~ ~ ~ : ' ; A
~
P
\ r~ . SPC~KANE - ~ ~ FNTFRN .
~ " • ~u - r • ~
• - ' U 9,13 /V - ~ . ~ • .
50
1 `'000
rs~
Valie ~65ion Pa
~ T NEA
yPar k Soo itn J~ • ~ ~fell ~ _
• .
W~ -:~•'C~~ / ~ MISSn"1ni ~ ;i n~ ' . sir
30 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ HookfCgj VaU `
~
eII
j
f
~I
2ozP Z,
~
n vF
. 1 : _BOONE- - AVE
.
~ 2005
~ ^I ( ~ ..~•~:.Y ` 11 ~ I M-.... . . -`t'J ~1 :..~."~L:~.= ± .
•WT
6 Eilakr
~ 1• 4 y
~C ' tich
l3rnur wn
i
I-" . 16 Nurlh l':n~•.v
5ch i
Jr Hiuh Srh
Well .
. ; _~I.. . . r~ . • 1'I ' 1040 + vncL r~
~-L~• . .+8.`~
H~Yi~ i 2G' , ~~r ~u s atlPn
. ~
~ I '
~ OPPORTU N IT i;
- ,
T _ - - ; _
~
re Sta. •'Uric)~ SPRAGUE'' Ri LIE I n,
~ -I~■~~= ' ,1~~'' ■
IL~IAI~ ~~II~►'~ "
tit Mnrr:
. . • . ~ 00
UL . ~ A
'ti
000
~i1~11~iC11'~ J ► Kryyfqltr ,
weu
p~':vg.c;p 6r: :
C9p► V8.q4,
• ~ 't~1~'Ct ibtn CkSlgn~ ~ Q.2`oi2 •lT~}o~ecbtoT c~8si
- _ . 1 po, tS~b '~li~Zes 2 ' vtil '~O.SSI~~iittSj'
T
- 6 ~ - , • . • A.r
I - - - ~ z 21 : ~ : .
, IOTH A. : ..avE
e~ Ly ~ . ~ . . : . .
c • v
/?TH -AVE. • i?Tf+ . ~ . AVENUE . •
~ • ?
°so ~ o ~ • . ~ . .
Welt •
C. 106- I•:eory;n•rn
t- \1r I)ntt:tid ~ Jr Il ti
Tenkl'~1 ` ! ! , ~ T hn P, o .
= ~
/
~ .r 4120BI /
iAAWL
7/95 HEC Staff Report forZE-23-95 Page ~
r
. ~
~ eE~is~as
PRoJEcr rFoRMAnorr /
woww +r,~dv.•uAc '
TmKaaJMoSF amut_am /
MeM71! UlNC! D1! 6r.- YAOS
U/OlOYw MbA fm
roraPwao.wcs M yd ~
qo~~
.
~3110101/R~iM6 / ~~1►5 ~ ~
ROO~~B~'y.M0IG1~fE~N / \ (n ~ ~
i ~
i ~
i
g5~ ~ ~ QQ
~ ~~g.9 ~ i~ ~ - ~ a ~Q
Rrrcitrcn
a 0
°o ItAy n s *AQ5 ~
ce- li~'
xsouo-odc Ka iW
~ •►OKANLCOUNTT
~
Y r{dNNIMO DEPAIITM[NT
CL. \ _ i t~l,.:.'• I
AdC)7FL ADOVlJGrV PMA.SE 1
I-lR11VAfJ0A7Ol1 ~
( I r ,/19t7t'~ 1tl~X1dF.N _ ~ w ' ~ ~ ~
I - 51G41'
IETAIA777av d.GO I
:
I i 4'i'• 7I ~.1~~~, 7/~.r- I ~~:-~i.:~ ~
Jr PAOPOsEO zo,vE a-s
i I °a ~ . ~ 0. 't:~'i'•~, C) ~
q ? r~
~ - ~
PA01°175ED MbTEL Pk4SE I ! 3
~
; . Aur aaM AWA atmaF ~
u d 4: ~ u 9 u a eran noo nom , i .
b
~g
~
al~ ~ ' I o
~ ~ ~ o l I
ELM " na
EM
' ~ • ~
0 0 (J^ p
DRAMN
X
~ pROJECT~tO
s,os,. MISSION AVENUE ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - oAn ~n~ns
Y Li+u N8953, r8'r yHEE1
S I T E P L A N N AoZ
. . . SCU' r".SnT
r ~
~
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: JULY 209 1995
SUBJECT: ZE-23-95, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN
RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO REGIONAL BUSINESS
(B-3)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Bill Lawson
202 East Trent
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 624-1170
Agent: Dwight Hume
South 107 Howard
Suite 325
Spokane, WA 99204
Contact Planner: John Pederson
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue,
approximately 300 feet east of Pines Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 10, Township
25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Regional Business (B-3) for a 200-unit motel, retail sales, offices and those uses
allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
II. SITE INFORMATION
A. Site Size: Approximately 3.57 acres
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan: The subject property is located within the Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is primarily a
residential designation consisting of a wide variety of housing types and
densities in a"city like" environment served by public facilities and
services. The more intensive uses such as light industrial, commercial and
neighborhood commercial will be located near heavily traveled streets and
serve as a transition between single family residential and more intensive
uses. Due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in the
Urban category there are few land use activities that would be
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 1
~
~
a
inappropnate Many uses may reqwre screening or other performance
standards to make them compatible with one another Major commercial
uses would not be compatible with Urban areas The proposed Regional
Business (B-3) zone typically implements the Major Commercial category
of the Comprehensive Plan The Neighborhood Business (B-1) zone
which allows small scale, neighborhood services retail and office uses is
often used to unplement the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan by
providulg facilities to serve the local neighborhood, and the Neighborhood
Business (B-1) zone can also provide a land use transition between the
Major Commercial category and less intensive land use categones The
subject property adjoins the Major Commercial category to the west, I-90 to
the north and the 'transition policy" of the Comprehensive Plan may be
apphcable Transition areas are defined as "the fnnge areas between two or
more Comprehensive Plan land use categones This is an area wluch can
allow developments complying with either land use category " The
proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to
Regional Business (B-3) is generally not consistent with the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Gwdelines of the Urban category Transition
pohcies of the Comprehensive Plan may be apphcable if deternuned by the
Hearing Body and if the proposed site plan illustrated a"transition" design
concept
2 ArterIlafl Road Plan The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan designates
Nilssion Avenue as a Nimor Artenal with a future nght of way width of 80
feet To implement the Arterial Road Plan, the County Engineer has
requested in addition to the required nght of way dedication of 2 feet, that a
strip of property 8 feet in width along the Mission Avenue frontage be set
aside as a Future Acquisition Area
C Site Characteristics The site is relatively flat and utilized for a church school,
gymnasium and playground Site vegetation include trees, grass and weeds
I) Neighborhoocl Characterastics The area near the intersection of Pines Road
(SR-27) and Mission Avenue is charactenzed by retail sales, convenience stores
and other commercial services and uses usually found near the intersection of an
arterial, State Hlghway and Interstate Highway The neighborhood east of Pines
Road along IVfission Avenue shows a transition from single fanuly residences to
offices, nursing/retuement facilities multi-fanuly residences and medical related
off'ices in close proximity to Valley General Hospital
E Zoning Analysis The predorrunant zoning classification for the area east of
Pines Road, north of Mlssion Avenue and south of I-90 is Urban Residential-22
(UR-22), wluch was established prior to adoption of the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zones were estabhshed
to facihtate development of inedlcal and professional offices and nursing home
facilities in close proxinuty to Valley General Hospital to the south Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zoning is also the predorrunant zoning classification south
of Mission Avenue (east of Pines Road) and these Urban Residential-22 (UR-
22) zones were established after adoption of the Spokane County Comprehensive
Plan Medical facilities and single fanuly residences are the donunant land uses
south of Mission Avenue
Proposal Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural (A) (24-42)
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 2
0
North Community Business (B-2) established in 1991 previously
established as Agncultural (A) (24-42)
South Regional Business (B-3) established in 1994 (36-94), previously
estabhshed as Commercial (147-81), Urban Residential-3 5
(UR-3 5) estabhshed in 1991, previously established as
Agncultural Suburban (AS) (99-55), and Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) established in 1991 previously estabhshed as Residential
Office (RO) (47-78, 42-85)
East Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) estabhshed in 1991, previously
established as Residential Office (RO) (189-79, 104-71)
West Commurury Business (B-2) established in 1991 previously
established as Agncultural (A) (24-42)
F I.and Use Analysis Land uses adjacent to the intersection of Pines Road
(SR-27) and I-90 are compnsed of a wide variety of retall sales, converuence
services and commercial activities designed to serve the travehng pubLc Land
uses east of Pines Road, along Mission Avenue show transition from strip
commercial at intersections to offices multiple fanuly residences, nursing homes,
and medical facillties to serve Valley General Hospital Single fanuly residences
are interspersed with medical offices and multifamily uses on the south side of
Mission, whereas the north side of Mission has developed with more intensive
uses wluch include offices medical offices and nursing homes The proposed
land use would extend more intensive commerciaUretaul uses further east along
1Vlission Avenue without provlding a transition in intensity to the less intensive
office uses adjacent to the east
Site Church school and gymnasium
North I-90 on ramp
South Converuence store, single farruly residences
East Medical offices Valley General Hospital nursing home multi-family
and single family residences
West Church, retail sales and rruni-mall
G Circuflatgoan Access to the site is provided by Mission Avenue and the
proposed site plan illustrates two access points to Mission Avenue The site also
adjoins the east-bound on ramp to I-90 and no access is provided to said on ramp
Internal access is provided by private dnveways wluch access the proposed
structures and the off-street parking spaces
A threshold traffic analysis was prepared for the proposal and said study
concludes that the development of the hoteUoffice site will not sigruficantly
impact either of the intersections analyzed (1Viission Avenue and Pines Road and
east-bound I-90 on ramps) The intersectron of Mission Avenue and Pines Road
will continue to function at its present level of service (LOS) D, and the
intersection of Pines Road and the east-bound I-90 ternunals, although they will
fall one level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours, will contulue to
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 3
function at acceptable levels of service wtuch by Spokane Counry Standards are
LOS D or better for signalized intersections" The Washington State Department
of Transportation (DOT) reviewed the threshold traffic analysis and provided
specific comments to the file in correspondence dated June 12, 1995 The
Department of Transportation requests that 'tlus development nutigate the
probable adverse unpacts to the transportation system directly attnbutable to thts
development "
H IDesign
1 Site Plan Data
Proposed Site Plan The subject property consists of approximately
3 57 acres located north of 1Vbssion Avenue, south of the east-bound I-90
on-ramp and approximately 240 feet east of Pines Road (SR-27) The site
plan dlustrates a 4-story (45') 200-unit motel, and one 4-story (50') 20,000
square foot retail/office building The proposed site plan also illustrates 266
off-street parkulg spaces and Type III landscaping along the north, south
and east property hnes No landscaping is provided or required along the
west property hne which is zoned Commuruty Business (B-2)
Off-street parking calculataons shown on the site plan are not consistent with
Section 14 802 040 (Off-Street Parking Requirements) of the Spokane
County Zoning Code The requued number of off-street parlang spaces for
the proposal is 300, and calculated as follows
1VIote1 = one (1) space per unit/room 200 uruts = 200 parlcing spaces
Off'ice/retail analyzed at the most intensive use = 1 space per 200 square
foot = 20 000 square feet/200 = 100 spaces
Pazkuig reqwrements may vary due to occupancy of the retail/off'ice
builduig and nununum parking requirements will be calculated during
bullduig pernut review based upon the specific square footage of uses
within the motel and retaiUoffice building
Use 200 urut motel retail sales/office building
Proposed Buildings Two
Building(s) Footprint Area 33,157 square feet
Site Coverage 19 52%
Maximum Structure Height 50 feet
Total Floor Area 132, 628
Building Setbacks Pronosed Reouued
Front yard (11hssion Avenue) 65 feet 35 feet
Side yard (East) 15 feet 15 feet
Side yard (West) 60 feet 0 feet
Rear yard (North) 15 to 125 feet 15 feet
Parking 266 300
Proposed Buffergng/I.andscaping Techniques The proposed site
plan illustrates Type III Landscaping of various widths along Nlission
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 4
~
Avenue and the north and east property lines To demoastrate comphance
with Chapter 14 806 (Landscaping and Screerung Standards) of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, a detauled landscape plan which illustrates 5
feet of Type III Landscaping along 1Vfission Avenue and the north and east
property lines must be subrrutted pnor to issuance of building pernuts
The site plan submrtted for review by the Heanng Examiner Cominittee is
general in nature Detailed review to deternurie compliance with all Zonuig
Code regulations and condiuons of approval is recommended to be
admirustrative and to occur at the Builduig Perrrut stage
I ~rainage A drainage plan is required This plan must be reviewed and
approved by the County Engineer s Department prior to development
J Power Transgntssion Lines/Other Known Easements None illustrated
Any recorded or requued easements will be disclosed dunng the building permit
process
K Watec Supply The proposal is witlun the Modem Electnc Water District
Provisions for water service will be met prior to issuance of building pernuts
I. Sev6►age Disposal The proposal is required to connect to public sewer Plans
and specifications for tlus connection are to be reviewed and approved by the
Spokane County Division of Utrlities
IVI School The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No comments
have been received from the school district at this time
N ]Eire Protection The proposal is within Fire District No 1 The Fue District
and the Division of Buildings Department (Fue Marshall) are required to approve
fire protection provisions pnor to issuance of any bufldsng permit
O Cultural Resources None have been identified
III ENVgRO1VIVIENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was subrrutted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
County Division of Buflding and Planning The review considered the specifics of the
proposal other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws,
possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan and
other County pollcies and guidelines The Division of Bullduig and Plantung has
deternuned that "No probable significant adverse impacts ' would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a Deternunation of Nonsigruficance ("DNS' )
The "DNS" was circulated to 13 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment
The "DNS" comment period ends July 18, 1995 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners witlun
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site The
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environ.mental related testunony at the
public heanng
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 5
I V DIVISION 4F BUILDING AND PLANNING SUNdMA1tY
The proposed site plan is generally consistent with the development standaxds of the
proposed Regional Busuless (B-3) zone However, the proposed Regional Business
(B-3) zone is inconsistent with the Urban category of the Spokane County
Camprehensive Plan and does not promote the specific Goals, Objectives and Decislon
Guidelines of the Urbaa category The praposed Regional Business (B-3) zone and
site plan design do not provide a transition in use or building height to the less intenslve
land uses to the east Impacts of the propasal could be nutigated through reduction in
building height, increased setbacks, additional landscaping, fencrng and reduction in.
signage The subject property does adjoin the Major Commercial Comprehensive Plan
category to the west and is in close proximity to the Pines Road (SR-27)/I-40
interchange Therefore, the transxtion pohcy of the Comprehensive Plan may be
apphcable if deternuned by the Heanng Exanainer Comnuttee If approved, the
following conditions af approval are recammended
V CONDITIONS OF APPRUVAL
I All condrtions tnposed by the JEleargng Examiner Committee shall
be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall iaclude the
owner or owners of the property, hegrs, assYgns and successors
i i 'I'he zone reclassification appl,es to the followiaag real property
All that portion of Tracts 21, 22 and 23, Assessor s Plat No 6 as recorded in
Volume "P' of Plats Page 14, described as follows
Begin at the SE comer of said Tract 22, thence north 89°53' 16 west, along the
south luie of saud Tract 21 and 22 416 67 feet to a pornt opposite Hlghway
Engineers Station M 12+96 and 30 0 feet northerly thereof thence north
84°10 38 west along a line if projected would end at a point opposite Highway
Engineers Station M 11+86 and 410 feet northerly thereof 6 09 feet, thence on
a beanng of north 246 32 feet to the intersection of a line drawn from a point
opposite Highway Engineers Station S 6+04 on the S line survey of State
Highway Route 90, Spokane to Greenacres, approved Apri121 1953, and
67 0 feet easterly thereof to a point opposite Hzghway Engineers Station NE
3+55 5 and 75 4 feet southeasterly thereof when measured radially from the NE
center line of sazd State Highway Route 90 Spokane to Greenacres thence N
$9°37 11 east, along said line 23 02 feet to a point opposite Highway
Engineers Statton NE 3+55 5 and 75 Q feet southeasterly thereof when
measured radially from the NE center luie said point being on a curve concave
to the northwest with a radius of 791 30 feet and a radial bearing of S
12°07 06 E, thence southwesteriy, through a central angle of 00°58 10 , an arc
dsstance of 13 39 feet to the intersection wrth the north line of the south 244 4
feet of said Tract 21 thence S 89°53 16' E along said north line 56 48 feet to
the west lule of saud Tract 22 thence N 00°44'1b E along said west line
13 41 feet to a point on a curve concave to the northwest with a raciius af
791 30 feet and a radlal bearing of S 15°2104" E said point being opposite
Highway Engineers Station NE 3+95 92 and 75 0 feet southeasterly thereof,
thence northeasterly through a central angle of 5°56 59 an arc distance af
82 17 feet to a pvint opposite Highway Englneers Station NE 4+70 3 and 75 0
feet southeasterly thereof thence N 37°3b'17 E 119 82 feet to a point opposite
Highway Engineers Station NE 5+70 4 and 20 3 feet southeasterly thereof,
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 6
s
thence N 59°05 58 140 02 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers
Station NE 6+67 4 and 24 3 feet southeasterly thereof thence N 47°52 36" E
166 47 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station NE P C 8+30 8
and 25 0 feet southeasterly thereof, thence S 44°3100 E at nght angles to said
NE Line center hne of said highway 50 00 feet to a point opposite Highway
Engineers Station NE P C 8+30 8 and 75 0 feet southeasterly thereof, thence S
45°29 00 W, parallel with said center line 54 73 feet to the east hne of saud
Tract 22, thence S 04°00"32 ' W along saud east llne 468 26 feet to the point of
beginning Sttuate in the County of Spokane, State of Washmgton
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING A►ND PLANNING
1 The pmposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, as amended
2 The apphcant shall develop sub3ect property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Heanng Body Variations when appraved by the
Planrung I)uector/desxgnee, may be pernutted including, but not hmuted to build.ing
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pemutted zone All
vanations must eonform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zorung
Code, and the onginal mtent of the development plans shall be ma.intained
3 Approval is reqwred by the Buulding and Planrung Duectorldesigmee of a specific
hghting and sigrung plan for the descnbed property pnvr to the release of any
building pernuts
4 A specific landscage plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Building and Planlung Duectorldesignee shall be subrrutted with a
performance bond for the project pnor tv release of buslding pernruts Landscaping
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not
obscured or unpaued
5 Direct light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
b The Spokane County DiVision of Building and Planning shall prepare and record
with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisitian area for
road nght-of-way and utahties The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice
shall be released, in full or zn part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The
notice shvuld be recarded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide
the following
a At least S feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght-of way and
utilities in addition to the existang andlor newly dedicated nght of-way along
Nussion Avenue NOTE The County Engineer has required 2 feet of new
dedscation
b Future bwld.ing and other setbacks requued by the Spokane County Zorung
Code shall be measured fram the reserved future acquisition area
c Na requued landscaping, parking 208 areas, draunfield or allowed signs
should be located within the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and
utilities If any of the above unprovements are made with.in this area they
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 7
1
shall be relocated at the applicant s expense when roadway improvements are
made
d The future acquisition area, until acquued, shall be pnvate property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parking, surface drainage drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered interun uses
e The property owner shall be responsible for relocatuig such 'interun'
improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway unprovements
after acquinng said future acquisition area
7 The Division of Builduig and Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Trtle Notice notuig that the property in question is subject to a
variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use actron
Tlus Trtle Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affectzng
the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Division of Builduig and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as
follows
The parcel of propecty legally described as [ ] is the subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Ofricial on [ ] irnposing a variety of
special development conditions Fele No [ ] is available for
inspection and copyflng in the Spokane County I)ivision of Building
and Plannnng
8 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requuements administeredlenforced as authonzed by the
State Budding Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressing, fire
apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building
accessiblhty, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, extenor wall
protection, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Buddings reserves the
nght to confirm the actual address at the time of budding permit )
SPOKANE COUIl1TY DIVISION OF ElVGINEERING AND ROADS
Pnor to issuance of a buildine nernut or at the reauest of the Countv Engineer in coniunction
with a Countv Road Proiect/Road Imnrovement District. whichever action comes first
1 Apphcant shall dedicate 2 feet on Mission Avenue for nght of-way and slope
easements as necessary
2 The apphcant shall dedicate the apphcable radius on 1Vlission Avenue and Pmes
Road
Pnor to issuance of a building nermit or use of the pronertv as pronosed
3 Access pemuts for approaches to the counry road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 8
p
~
4 Access pernuts and improvements to Pines Road must be approved by the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
5 The apphcant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane Counry Engineer road,
drauiage and access plans
6 A parlang plan and traffic cuculation plan shall be subrrutted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer The design location and arrangement of parlang stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traff'ic engineenng practices Paving or
surfacing as approved by the Counry Engineer, will be requued for any portion of
the project wluch is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
7 The construction of the road unprovements stated herein shall be accomphshed as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
8 All requued unprovements shall conform to the current State of VVashington
Standard Specif'ications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Comnussioners Resolution No 80-1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal
10 No constructron work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way unt11 a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work
within the pubhc road right-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer
11 All requued construction witlun the existing or proposed public nght-of-way is to
be completed pnor to the release of a building pernut or a bond in an amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer
12 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Mlssion Avenue as a 1V41nor Artenal The
existing nght-of-way wldth of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the
Plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the requued
nght-of-way dedication, a stnp of property 8 feet in width along the 1Vhssion
Avenue frontage shall be set aside in reserve This property may be acquued by
Spokane County at the tune when artenal unprovements are made to 1Vlission
Avenue
13 There may exist utihties, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
properly, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarduig these utilities Applicant(s) should check with the apphcable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work
i
4 hould unprovements be required by the Department of Transporta es
Roa dditional improvements may be re~uire ion venue
► ~-I '
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 9
0
SPOKAiVE COLJNTY DIVISION OF UTII,ITIES
1 A Covenant shall be signed statrng The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree
to authonze the County to place theu name(s) on a petition for the formation of a
ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94, wluch petition iacludes the
Owner(s)' properly, and further not to object by sigiung of a protest petition against
the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94
wluch includes the Owner(s)' property PROVIDED, this condition shall not
prohibrt the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the
properiy as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of
a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94
2 A wet (hve) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be
constructed Sewer connection pernut is required
3 Apphcant is requued to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement pnor to issuance of permit
to connect
4 Applicant shall subrrut expressly to Spokane Counry Utilities Department "under
separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for
Pubhc Sewer connecuons for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to
issuance of permit to connect
5 Secunty shall be deposrted with the Utilities Department for construction of public
facihties
6 Arrangements for payments of additianal sewer charges must be made for pnor t@
issuance of sewer connectaon pernut
7 Any water service for tlus project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
SPOKAIVE COg7NTY HEAI.TH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Duector of Utalities, Spokane
County
3 Water service shall be by an existing pubLc water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane) State Department of Health
4 A pubhc sewer system will be made available for the platlproject, and individual
service wfll be provided to each lot Use of individual on-site sewage dlsposal
systems sha11 not be authorized
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 10
~
SP~KANE COIJNTY AIR PO$.I.UTI0N COIVTROL AUTHO1tITY
1 All au pollution regulations must be met
2 Air pollution regulations require that dust enussions dunng demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled This may require the use of water sprays tarps
sprmklers or suspension of activiry dunng certain weather conditions Haul road
should be treated and errussions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled
as well as enussions from all other construction related activities
3 SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e, ingress, egress, parkuig
areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to nunimize dust errussions
4 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dut and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immedlately to clean these surfaces
5 Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i e, construction waste, etc )
6 Demohtron and renovation projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40, Part
61, Subpart M, the National Errussion Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAPS) and SCAPCA Regulation I Article IX which address asbestos abatement
issues Intent to Demolish forms are available at the SCAPCA office
7 Some objectionable odors will lilcely result from this project SCAPCA's regulations
state that effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a
nunimum
8 Any project that makes changes to the regional transportation network may be requued
to conform to the Waslungton State implementation Plan and be further reqLUred to
demonstrate conformance pnor to development
7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-23-95 Page 11
47/20 95 11 06 ID WSDOT EASTERN REGION FAX 509-324-6005 PAGE 2
,~-U7-20-95 09 06 AM FROM BENNETT6ASHENBRENER ?0 509 324 6005 P02
~
PRoPoSED STgPMAaED coxDIT=oNa
RIZ0~ NEM llNES AT+tD MzssiAn
P'ile 93-23-95
The State of Washinqtoxi Depactment of Tr&ftegorgation (DOT ) and
the owttegs of the Ab0vQ=9QquQ8t6d reSanai have renched an agreamnt
a• ta the Mitiqation nOo086arY te► offaat the Lmp8ot anticLp&tvd to
he oaused by tho additional tralfic genezated by OwaaOro° resoaaed
develop=nt e
DW ard Psoponents roqaost that the agreenont o ae f ollowsa be
ift0olVorated ae aonditions into the appgowed zone ohangeowith the
Owners dedolopinq the site plaa of gecord being obligated for the
tollawings
10 owaners will dedidate a 6-foot atrip of r~ght°of-way aloaaq thci
westera postien of thoir parcelowhiob parael is already ~oned
Bm2 and not actually a part of thAO &one change pgoporal a The
1eng1th of the 6mfoot rgghtmof•way atrip will be appraximtely
175o36 4aet a$ad wi11 not involve the nagthern jog at ~~e
northwoet corner of such parcel a• that riqht-ot-way bas
already been acqufred by DOT og aome mther qovezaamental aqency
nor does it involve the radiue of the ourvo at the southwost
corneg of sueh parael ams that rightmot-way has also been
acquired by DA'P og so= otbez goverrsatental agennyo
2. ownegs wi]ll dedioate additional rightmoi-way alvnq the antire
southern grontage af tlavLr paroal to p►rovide tho Caunty of
Spo~e with ttetal rightoof-way fgom conteriin• of Mission
Aveflue to the oauthern boundlary ot Awnegs° pnrcol of 40 leeto
3 a Owness •hmli pave an addlitional lane on Miosion tapering in
fron the southeast oogner of their W eel and eventuabby
blending into the exieting right turn lnne at the southweet
postion of theiz pareel. The pavonont shall be accosdinq to
County opeoitieations and shall 9.nclude curbo quttor and
aidowalko Owners shFnll not bo required to inetall a riqht
tura tgaflie •ignal or othar tacaffic aignala$ation at the
lfnee aaed ltissgon intessoctian
41 ahal1 pay the •tm of $430600 !.n cash to DOT at suoh
tine ae a bugl.dinq pasmit ie obtngneci to construot any oaae of
the isprovownto on the Wooi Pos whivh the &one chanqe i•
~equested bu$ in no event iatet than 12 mantha tsvm the date
of tho approval 04 zone chanqo lrom UR-3 g eo Bm3 Qor the
subject parool.
S. DOT @hall be entftled to utilize the $43,600 for improvmmaats
to the linos and Mission integseAtLon inalndinq, but not
lisitod to implmentatson of additional lanea, siqnalfzationB
.01o
07/20 '95 il 07 ID WSDOT EASTERN REGION FAX 509-324-6005 PAGE 3
.
,
~
wideninq oQ the interseetion or any otheg imprevements d~gmod
Oppsoprfate by DOIN og Bat the •ole df scretion of DOTo f er the
~~eeway seamp iaprov~ate achoduled for the 1-90iPinaw
intorohGLeqe f.nvolvbnq eithes the east bound of f-raapts or the
wont bonnd oaa-ramps, or aay oombinatian of theee pro jeatso
6. In any evento Ownore axpressly wtive any right wha.ch they aaay
have ta g~imbtarsomont of the funds eontributed ta nOT pursuant
to RCN 620 02 e020 or any other •tatutoxy Qs common law
authority of the State of Washinqtono
WA6~~NGTAN D~~ARTHRUT OF OWNEltS
TRANSPOR2ATION
by
WIY.Y~IAM . J LAWSON Ytv
ItORLRT A BOIdLnCCELLI . v
. . ~ '
; OW P
~
~ e~+e~~ Q ~ •G ~aao~ 61~2 ~4d ~81so
1° ,
~ i
. . i
~
U r I.:: I C.: t~ L . i r~ i HL L.: lJ U i'Al`r LNC:i 1 I"y t1,;
A.. 1~. I I, I 'T' L.-! T 1(7 T n1, :
-~i . ~i;., .
r
I
y
T1_1n Sp----E::anP Count
Ad fTll.l'11-St Ya tc:I F
~
~°5pp1 i cants Name LawSc-n/Bonuc ce.':
S R c t i n 1 r_
re: Zonir
I 1 1e f l_~ 1 1!~':~' .A. i 7 t..~ ~ i..- ! 1 l..t lr I I::.: ~ i-~..! E_~ i'...~ ..1. .L i~...~ 1 I i I.. i._~ : i::: I _ .
chanqe are submitted to the Spokane County Hearinq Eram.iner Commi'+
for inclusion in the "Planninq Report" ancl "Fi n!1-inc1 Anci OrrJr~r" the public hearing schedLtled July_20, 199'
C^ F~ A Prior to i s sua n c e of a bui 1 d i n q p e r m:i t,
County Enqineer in conjunction with a Cuunty Road Pr-Dject/Road
T ~i n lr r r (j} 1 '1 'f; n 1 Y- 'f f" 1-7 ~ l,J ~l ~ ~I f:? t_I Y t" i. ,y, r7 (-,-I I fl R. j f - •
.
tip~.7 1 ~ ~ .
' ~ r ~j
. .i:~if 1' C~.''1Lc:l
~
Wcy afl~`~ s~.~~~:)E' Pafii(?(Plf?f1t5 c~G Cl~?CE?St~~e3Y'~i,
E;8 Applicant shall dedicate the applicable radii_« on Missi-Dn_AvenLte
a n d f' .i n e<.- Rnad.
rnY- ~1.•-_.Y tc, • ~ < F , . • -•Y~IT1:A. ' . _
the r)1'_,::.iptti v._'+,
- c:•1 ~.1~:' t utiE:?
_
Ar_ c e ss, p erm i. t for : p p r .:."C-k h C'M:3 t ID t-h~~ ~ ---:.i_(n t y R-:~,a c:l `_'y~• t ~ im h r~ 1 1. t)
i-~ b ta i ne (J f r- c, m-t hc C,- - i_t r-i t. y i.= ri U? i c:: r e
E_ -:1. :l A c c e s s Perm its an d (fl F) 'f" ,--:IV~? f Il ef1 t5'~ F' .i. ri ec-:> _R----.ad ml..ts-t be
hy the Washington State pppartmPnt --If TranSR►_-1rtation
F-3' Applicant shall si_tt)mi-t -f----Ir appr._.va.l +:hu., ~-,...~mr,
~!"1 Cl 7. r.:, Y' !-I Y:-~ i. n:a. n r? !~1 r j r r p~=; ~ p t"1
J
.
c
Pa g~' i
E45 A park:ing plan and traffic circulatic,n p].an shall be si_tbmitted
and approved by the Spokane Gounty Enqineer. The desiqn,
location and arranqement of park:inq stalls shall be in
accordance with standarci enqineerinq practices. Pavinq or
surfacinq as appr-Dved by the C~Dunty Engineer wi 1 1 be required
for any portion of trie pro,ject Wriicri is to be occupied or
-Lrave1ed by vehicies,
E,40 Trip- c--_,nstr-ucti.-r1n the ri:aarJway imFar-c.,vement~~ <->tatecj herein sha.11
be a r_r_---i-npl..is l-ied --As <aparoved by tfiP SpclE::ane D-Junty Enqineer-.
ES:i A 11 r e q+_r ir e Ji iYi ~i- _v i-ri E n ts h a 11 r. ~*D ri fc, r- m t-D t I-1 r:~ cI_t r_ r_ C.-' r..I -t 'S t a t: } f
Washington Standard Specifications fc-r Road and Bridge
con5trLtCtion and other appl i cable coi_tnty standards and/or
adopted reso1 litions pertaininq pertaininq to Road Standards and
Stormwater Manaqement in effect at tt-ie date of construction,
Ltnless c-therwise approved by the County Fnqineer.
L`C1J Roadway standar-ds, typica:l r-z-adway secticins and dr~.~inaqe plan
reylAirements are fOland in Spokane Esoard of Cvunty Commissioners
res-D1ution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to trris
pr.--- p-=Isa 1 .
E"JB No construction work: is to be performeci within -tt-ie ea;istinq c-r
proposed riqht of way i_inti 1 a permit has been issi_ied by the
C:ounty Enqineer, All work: within the pi..tblic road riqht r-of way is
sub.ject tr, insper..ti.c-r7 -anci appr-c,ual hy the t"-Di.tnty fngineer,
~ ~ _ . . . .a f-: . • .'1. .t; :i n ca p ° ~ i..tt~ 1 ir
~:..1 f~ Y' E? i:" ~..1:!. 1'' r:? C: 1"1 ' r ; 1'' ~_l C t' :l. fl W.1_ t fl J. f-1 . f'I C. t'" 1 Y~_.~ C.
riqht of way is to be completed prior to the release cofi a
bLti 1 d i nq permi tor a bond i n an amount est imated by t he County
Enga.neer to cover the cost ~w-f constri_tctiiDn or imp~-Dvements shal 1
he fi_ 1eci w i. t h t he Cc-1..tn t y Er7 U i r-t eer.
F61 T I--ie Cc-unty A r- t c= ri~ 1 R.----:.:-~ dp1ari ident ifie~::5 A v eni_i E? s
IHinor Arterial. The existinq right of way~width ofi~6{a~ft. is
not consistent wzth that specified in The Plan. In order t-D
i.mplement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
addition to tfie required riqht of way dedication, a strip ~afi
prnper ty 8 f t. i n wid t h a 1onq t he hlission AvenLte f rontaqe be set
aside in reserve. This pr-operty may be acquired by Spok:ane
County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to
MissioDn AvenLte.
F'-9() There may exist i-ttilities, either underqround or overhead,
affectinq the sub.ject property, inr_1udinq priDperty to be
ciedicated cir set aside for flAtLtre acqLtisiti-Dn. Spc4--:ane C-wii_inty
~,.~s~sume s) no f.inanr_i.<~l. --:-b1iqati-M1n fcir aci.justments or rele-ication
- - - - - - - J
~
regarding tfiese uti lities. Appl i cant sFioiald cfieck: with the
~.~.pplicable utility purvey-Dr and the Sp-Dk;ane C-_-,_tnty Enqineer ~
determine whether applicant ---ir the utility is responsible fc~~
~-kd j us t m e n t or
.
~
x.mprlDur. ~m.nts k)e t~~. iq~_i~i.r~~.. ~id t~y tr-i~. ~ n.- f~r_~ 1.-1, ~'t:(jlE•~"~.~" c - ; .c . .
~.:~I~_ t1c1 ~
fiDr P i n e s RiDa(::!
r.
M.i.s s i.--- n A v e n1_t
~
~
1
r ~
i..i i: i.:: I L t_ U N i F-I k i=: u u N -r i~A b.'1 1u;:_: <-;i,mrni!NTY„ ~3 1..1 rr,ir,_I-r7~~~ ~
i
r=~ r 11 1:~:: ~ 1'' '
TI-1: Spok:ane County Planninq Department (Current Planr} -1:
Admini.strat.-Jr.)
Fr~ ----m: Spcikane Cclunty Enqinee•r's IJepartment
~
Sub.je c t: f.;cind it ic-ns ._If Apprciwa 1 Zc-Ine Chanqe No: Unassign~:~c,1 I
Appl i cants fVame Lawson/Bonuccel ry_ ~
, - - .
The fo11ow:i.nU "Cc-nditic-Iris c-If Apprc-lval " fc-Or. .the ab~.~:ive refereni_ecl :1--inE
r_hange are submitted to the Spok:ane Coianty Planninq Department for
i.nclusion in the Desic7n Review Meetinq schedi_tled April_12, 1995.
E36A Prior tU issuance of a biji ldinq permit or at the reqi_iest of tF;!
Cnunty EnUineer in con.junction with a County Road
;.:r... _i., .
...i_.. . . i.... i i~..l y l~►~l~ ~fl I'iVE!flI-lt' 1 1u1-
k._ . r~~_.l ~1Cc~ii ~L ~i~ ~.~~~~a ~ ~
way and s1.:--,pP easements as necPSaary.
EL;H Applicant shall dedicate trie applicable radius con Mission_A_veni-«
and Pi nes Rclade
c:t
Pr.~. i`er . ti::i 1'~E:~ IE'~ C~t7E'a I.f U ~ _t (::)I_l 1. ~.~.~.1..I...I. t~~:.~rrn:A ' f~a i' i f t: f-lf:.' ~:)T'-j.:l~.1E'Y t~t~
. t~
t~.~ i r7 = ci f r~_-rn t f'1 E~ -_-~_l fli~~" E I°1 C] 1 fl e E? Y,~
E -:11. AC: C ess peir (Tl 1't 5 af 1 Ci 1 fTl (J Y' c-oVefTl E•' t°l ts tci P:t. nP~'i - R-r,c.~1(~ fTl i..15 t t~ E? t~ (.)F7Yi::.iV F:' C~
~
, .,i,; .
f? t hl P~ e s~"i J rl Ca t i'i(l -I' F~ t)epDr t ment cif Y' iafl t~;poi'' %=.1 •iofl
't.. i :~i I t I I c:l .L .I . . I.!. LJ 1 I i J. I i..J i ,l `..i I..? i ~ V .l. I..! `y I I f::.' I •._l I I
CnqinPer drainaqe and access plans.
F45 A park:inq plan and -traffic circulatic~i-i plan shal l b~ sut-,;;,;
and approved by the Sp~okane Coi_inty Engineer, The desi.r,
1cicat.i.c-n and arranqement cif parking stal 15 shal 1 he ir
I
~
p c:l Q
accordance witl-i standard enqineerinq practices. Paving or
surfacinq as approved by the County Enqineer will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occi_tpied iDr
traveler_I hy vpfiicles
E40 The constrLtction of the r~.~adway improvements stated herein shall
be accr-Implisheci as appr-cived by the 51Dc,E::ane D-Jurity Enqineer.
E51 Al l rfaqua.r-E-cl i.mFir-_-vE~mer7ts shal r~~~~nf~~~rm t--_:- th-ie c.l_trre-nt Stat~ .--:-f
Washinqton Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
cc:instrUction and other applicable county standards and/or
adiDpted re5iD1i_ct ions per tai ni ng pertai ni ng to Road Standards and
Stcermwater Manaqement in effect at the date of construction,
unless c-ItherwisP appriDved by the C~~-unty Enqineer.
E r~`:.; R-----adway atarfdarcis, tYNIc.al rcladway secti-1--r-is arirJ cirainage p1an
requirements are foiind in SpiDk:ane BoDard of Co.-junty Commissioners
re5olution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
pr --I p~~sa l. .
F5E3 Nc- cc-Instru«tion w---IrE:: is tc- be perfc-rmerl within the e%istiriU cir-
pr-Dposed riqht of way until a permit fias been issi_ted by the
County -Enqineer. Al l work: within the public road riqht of way i5
suh.jer_t t'-1 .inspPctic-n ~-:~nd apprclval bJ the C~~-unty Enrainee.ra
E59 All required cunstriaction within the e•r;istinq cir proposed public
right of way is to be c-Dmpleted prior t---) the release of a
huildinq permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the c-ast of construction or improvements shall
be f i.1 ec1 w i. t h t he C,-.,..,. n ty En gi neer.
EG1 The D-Dunty Ar-tcrial p1Lan identifies h1issi-:-,n_Avenue as a
Minor Arterial. The existing right of way~width ofr60~ft. is
notYconsistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to
a.mplement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
additiiDn to the required right cif way dedication, a strip of
property 8 ft. in width ~.zlonq the Mission AvenLte frontaqe be set
aside in reserve. This property may be acyuired by Spokane
County at the time when Arterial Zmpr-c)vements are made to
Mission Avenue.
F'D-c=) There may exist utilities, either LtnderqroLtnd or overhead,
affectinq the sua.ject property, incli_iding property to be
dedicated or set aside for filtLtre acqLii5ition. Spok:ane County
assumes ni-i financial obliqation for ad,ju«tment5 rr relocation
regardinq these i_ttil.ities. Applicant should check: with the
appl.icable lAtility purveyUr and the SpoE;ane County Engineer to
c:ietermirie wfiether applicant ._:,r fi;he i_ttili.ty iT-:, rc-,,sponsible f-Dr
_ itadjust(Yl E, fl t
1• ".1
. _
. . . . } . . .L. ~ _ . . . ~ I
c:f a. ~ r; F► r ~ t-, f7 f::•. r r:~~ _ J. ) I_i
fiD1'' P i n e s Rot3d bk~:?
h1:i. r ) A v c~ F-1 I..t
A. ~ lr ::.-1 fl .:1. c:i ncl l'y' S1 w> t: ' . . ~ ~ • `
t~.1t- ~ D• 4~ rLrri~.~ nt~::~ P
Trna~4portation by SpoE;ane Regi-Dnal Transportation C~DLtnci 1
~'AC C~~luf1t portiiDns cif this prc-pcised rezone, SpE?Clf 1 Callyr an 800':
sq~_~are foot restaurant and a200 Ltnit motel were reviewed. It
determined that dual southbound left turns at Pines and Mission
be reqijired if this entire pro.ject was to move fcirward in the lancj
i_«e process. This requirement for the turn lanes wOLtld nePd to be
addressed in at a minimijm an MDIVS. Discussi-Dns are still occurrir-ocj
between tfie project spnnsor, WSDOT and Spc-4--:ane C~ -unty Enqineeeri.nc;,
r-elating to the spcinsors participatiiDn in this requir-emen#-4
r_~~ r:i ~i •I~: i r~, .-t 1 r_~ ~ .F. .i ~_i 1-•~ f.l F)
~
~ waSh1119t017 Stat@ Eastern Region
~ Department of Transportation 2714 N- Mayfair S:re:1
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation
(-509) 324-6000
April 12, 1995
Mr. Bill Moser
Spokane County Plannin sT` W. 1026 Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-02
Re: SR-27 Bob BonuccelliBill Lawson
Zone Change (HoteUOffice/Restaurant)
Dear Mr. Moser:
.After reviewing the above development the Was}lington State DepartRient of
Transportation (WSDOT) has the following comments concerning this proposal:
1. As you are aware WSDOT is very concerned about the operation of the Pines Road
(SR-27)/I-90 Interchange. Our concern at this interchange stems from recent traffic
growth in this area, and the lack of capacity available at this interchange to
accommodate it. At the present time the south ramp ternunals operate at Level of
Service (LOS) "F" in the p.m. peak hours and do not have capacity to accommodate
additional traffic volumes. In addition to this, the intersection of Pines Road and
Mssion Avenue, which is located adjacent to this proposed devetopment, has been
experiencing an unusually high number of intersection accidents.
Additionally as part of our analysis for Pines Road, we had Spokane Regional
Transportation Council (SRTC) study the intersection of Pines Road(SR-27) and
Mssion Avenue. This study, in part, analyzed the impact of the proposed Hotel and
Restaurant on the intersection of Pines Road and Mssion Avenue. If this development
is allowed to go forward without any improvements to this intersection, the LOS will
be degraded as a direct result of this development. Level of service will drop from LOS
"D" to LOS "E" and a new violation of state and federal carbon monoxide standards is
projected to occur.
The SRTC study investigated numerous improvements for the intersection of Pines
Road and Mssion Avenue with the most* feasible being the addition of a dual
southbound left turn lane. This improvement will maintain LOS "D" and slightly
improve the existing carbon monoxide readings at this Iocation with this proposed
development. However, it needs to be recognized that the benefit this improvement
creates will be primarily consumed by the additional traffic generated.
.t
Mr. Moser ,
.
April 12, 1995 ~
Page 2
2. We would request that the above probable adverse environmental impacts be addressed
in the SEPA documentation prepared for this project prior to it being scheduled for a
public hearing.
3. Any signage visible from I-90 wiil need to be reviewed by WSDOT and conform to
applicable chapters of the "Scenic Vista's Act".
"-)ue to the proximity of our facilities to this site and the topography of the area,
rainage plans prepared for this site need to reviewed by WSDOT to ensure our
.cilities are not adversely affected.
ityou shouId have any questions regarding the above subject please feel free to contact
Leonard Cash or Greg Figg in our planning office at 324-6199.
Sincerely,
LEONARD CASH, PE
Regional Planning Engineer
JCL
LCC/gjf
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
Tom Davis, Spokane County Building Dept.
BENNET'I', ASHENBREIVER & hAVIDSON, P.S.
CHRISTOPHER R. ASHENBRENER ATTORNEYS AT LAW OF COUNSEL
LARRY M. QAVIDSON 140 SOUTH ARTHUR, SUITE 600 JAiCK BENNETT
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202
TELEPHONE (509) 535-2400
FAX (509) 535-0677
March 31, 1995
ECEIVED
R
p
Mr. Greg Figg ApR 3 1995
~ % ER
Washington ate Department gpOKANE COUN'1'Y ENGINE
of Trans rtation
2714 Nort~i Mayfair Street
Spokan~ WA 99207-2090
Re: 'nes and Mission Meeting
D r Greg.
's will confirm that the meeting with DOT, Glenn Miles and Pat Harper ooncerning the impact
on Pines and Mission from the proposed motel at the Seventh Day Adventist location is oontinued
unril Tuesday, April 11, at 2:00 p.m., at the DOT offices.
I would appreciate your contacting Glenn Miles and Pat Harper to assure they will be at the
meeting and by way of oopy of this letter to each of them I am reminding them of the same.
Unfortunately, the proposed purchasers of the Seventh Day Adventist site have a strict timeline
within which to obtain the necessary approvals and zoning for the construction of the motel. Much
of that time has been oonsumed in our attempts to resolve the traffic impact. It is imperative that
we come to some conclusion very rapidly or we run the risk of loosing the project altogether. This
would seem to be wholly inappropriate since the site seems to be destined for a motel or some
similar type project and the traffic impact would not appear to be so overwhelming as to justify
preclusion of the oonstruction of the motel. In this regard, it is our hope that we can come to some
type of final resolution at the April 11 meeting so we can rnove forward with our zoning change and
oonsummate the project.
Thank you for whatever assistance you can give us in this regard.
Very truly yours,
CHRISTOPHER R. ASHENBRENER
CRA}: P
cc: ~'at HarPer, SPokane CountY Public Works
Glenn Miles, SRTC
Bob Bonuccelli
Bill Lawson
BENNE"I"T, ASHENBRENER & DAVIllSON, P.S.
CHRISTOPHER R ASHENBRENFR ATTORNEYS AT LAW OF CUUNSEL
LARF3Y M DAVIDSON 140 SOUTH ARTHUR, SUITE 600 JACK BENNETT
SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99202
TELEPHONE (509) 535-2400 (
\
FAX (509) 535 0677
FebruarY 24, 1995 J
;
- ~ . . . ~ G .
Mr. Greg Figg I Washington State Department of Transportation
2714 N. Mayfair St. F F~' Spokane, WA 99207-2090
RE: Lawson/Bonuccelli Zone Change
Dear Greg:
I have just received word from Glenn Miles that the traffic
analysis for Pines and Mission is complete and that the DOT has
been presented with a copy. Glenn suggested that I contact you to
obtain a copy on behalf of my client.
It is my understanding, in speaking with Glenn Miles, that the
Pines and Mission intersection can maintain Level D with the
proposed buttonhook ramp and signal optimization. Obviously, we
are interested in proceeding along these lines or some modif ication
thereof and establishing what the prospective obligation of the
property owners of the Seventh Day Adventist Parcel will be.
I will be out of town the week of February 27, but I would
appreciate your sending a copy of the traf f ic analysis to my of fice
so that I can make it available to my clients and we can prepare to
meet and, hopefully, f inalize these issues. Please include any
costs for copies or postage for which you are seeking reimbursement
and I will promptly remit.
Upon my return, I would hope that we could again meet and by
way of copy of this letter to Pat Harper, I am suggesting that he
be present at the meeting so that we can hammer out some of the
details necessary to reach an agreement as to the specific
obligation of the Seventh Day Adventist parcel.
Thank you for this assistance and please advise me or my
clients directly as to any problems or concerns you anticipate in
this regard.
Very truly yotirs,
/
CHRISTOPHER R. ASHENBRENER
CRA:glh
CC: Patrick Harper, Spokane County Public Works
Bob Bonuccelli, Village Square Realty
Terry Goebel, Dullanty Law Offices
PAGE 1 15:25:55 06 APR 1995
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
03042 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 FANCHER FRONTAGE RD U 17 PAVED 20
MISSION AV 00.490 THIERMAN ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00.620 BRADLEY RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00.770 LILY RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00.930 BOWMAN RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00.990 PARK RD U 17 PAVED 20
01.110 CENTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
01.130 CENTER RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
01.230 ELLA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
01.270 ELLA RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
01.290 ELTON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
03043 MISSION AV (STAR.T) 00.000 VISTA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
MISSION AV 00.140 BESSIE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
00.260 SARGENT RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
00.330 MARGUERITE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
00.510 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 16 PAVED 44
00.570 MULLAN RD (ONE WAY N U 16 PAVED 44
00.680 WILLOW RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
00.760 LOCUST RD U 16 PAVED 36
00.920 FARR RD U 16 PAVED 36
01.010 WOODRUFF RD U 16 PAVED 36
01.140 HER.ALD RD ( END ) U 16 PAVED 36
01.260 FELTS RD U 16 PAVED 36
01.390 R.AYMOND RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
01.430 OBERLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
01.520 UNIVERSITY RD U 16 PAVED 36
01.670 GLENN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
01.770 PIERCE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
01.950 WOODWAR.D RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
02.020 BOWDISH RD U 16 PAVED 36
02.080 BATES RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
02.140 WILBUR RD U 16 PAVED 36
02.310 UNION RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
02.510 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 16 PAVED 50
02.650 HOUK RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50
02.720 HOUK RD (START) U 16 PAVED 50
02.780 NJERCLER RD ( END ) U 16 PAVED 50
02.900 WOODLAWN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50
03.030 MCDONALD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
03.260 BLAKE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.400 MAMER RD U 16 PAVED 22
03.520 EVERGREEN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.670 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.790 BEST RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.880 REES CT (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.040 ADAMS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.130 MARCUS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.190 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.320 PROGRESS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.380 ST CHARLES RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
04.560 CATALDO AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
MISSION AV (END) 04.590 SULLIVAN RD
03045 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO FLOR.A RD U 19 GRAVEL 20
MISSION AV 00.300 FLORA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
MISSION AVE 00.460 P,RC ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
MISSION AV 00.790 LONG RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
PAGE 2 15:26:02 06 APR 1995
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
00.870 ARTIES ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.030 GREENACRES RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.270 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.690 GR.ADY RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.750 HODGES RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.810 ALADDIN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.870 CAVALIER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
02.070 HOLL RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
02.190 GLENBROOK RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
MISSION AV (END) 03.280 HARVARD RD (START) R OS GRAVEL 30
03046 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 LIBERTY LAKE RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 26
MISSION AVE (END) 00.220 SIGNAL RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22
MISSION AV 00.470 HOMESTEAD DR (END) R OS LIGHT BITUM. 22
00.790 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
01.300 SIMPSON RD (LIBERTY R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
MISSION AV (END) 03.100 IDAHO RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
03047 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 LINCOLN COUNTY LINE R 09 GR.AVEL 18
MISSION RD 00.570 RR TRACKS R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
MISSION RD (END) 01.030 STROUP RD R 09 GR.ADED/DRAINED 10
03049 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 FLINT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
MISSION RD 00.500 OLD TRAILS RD (START R 09 GRAVEL 20
01.060 DENO RD (STA.RT) R 09 GRAVEL 20
MISSION RD (END) 02.150 GROVE RD R 09 GRAVEL 20
03048 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 WOOD RD R 09 GR.AVEL 12
MISSION RD (END) 01.000 RITCHEY RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 12
7 Records Processed
. . '
April 12, 1995; 1:15 p.m.:
BONUCCELLI/LAWSON ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Pines Road
(SR-27) and Mission Avenue in Section 10, Township 25N., Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Major Commercial/Urban, and within Prioriry
Sewer Service Area (PSSA)
EXISTING/PROPOSED Z0NING: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and
Community Business (B-2) to Regional Business (B-3)
PROJECT DESCRUMON: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residenrial-
3.5 (UR-3.5) and Community Business (B-2) to Regional Business (B-3)
for a 200-unit motel, restaurant, retail sales, office building, and those uses
allowed in the proposed Regianal Business (B-3) zone.
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 45103.0220, 45103.0222, 45103.0276
SITE SIZE: Approximately 4.9 acres
APPLICANT(s): Bill Lawson & Robert Bonuccelli
P.O. Box 141449
Spokane, WA 992141449
(509) 924-9730
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Bill Moser
- RECEIVED
.
~A. ~t MaR 1995
Cwnty Eigineeriag
S P O K A N E a;;~,;~~~. ~~ti C O U N T Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HU[3[3,qRD, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Brenda Sims, Storm Water Utility
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilides Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
Greg Figg Department of Transportation
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Central Valley School District
Fire Protection District No. 1
Modern Electric Water Co./Consolidated Irrigation District '
FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior PlannerQ~`
s
DATE: March 29, 1995
RE: Bob Bonuccelli/Bill Lawson Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5) and Community Business (B-2) to
Regional Business (B-3)
APPI.ICATIQN ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING
Anril 12. 1995 AT 1:15 P.M.
CniiNTV pLANNING CONFEREHGE ROQM. 2ND FI,nQR
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW NiEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the
attached form to Bill Moser for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in
the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your
cooperation. If you have any questions about the applicarion, please contact Bill Moser
of the Planning Deparament at 456-2205.
c: Bill Lawson and Robert Bonuccelli
Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan
1026 WGST BROADWAY Avr_NUL • SPoKnNC, WASIl1NGTON 99260-0240 •(SO9) 456-2205 • FAX: (SO9) 456-2243 • TDD: (509) 324-316(;
•
. '
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" R~
' WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) ~~y 2 b 199o
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE J
toA
FILE NUMBE!~(S-1~ 7T--_11_Q5
DESCRIPTI0-;'~Y ~~1` ~'a~~~~~~ ~~;Al,: I > t\. (UR-3.5) to Regional Business (B-3) for a 240-uniz motel, I-etail sLiies, offices -Aild tllose tisc;
allowed in the Regional BuSille`S ( B- ')l zoile.
APPLICANT: F3i11 Law-SUn
202 East Trci-a 'y~~ ~ilL:c
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 624-1170
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission
Avenue, approximately 300 feet east of Pines Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 10, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLA►NNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has deternuned that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is io required under RCW 43.2 1 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other inform,ation on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must
be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., July 18, 1995, if they are intended to
alter the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: JAMES L. MANSON, DIREC"TOR
By: John Pederson, Senior Planner
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Plannin`:
West 1026 BroadwaN
Spokane, WA 99266
DATE ISSUED: . o~ (o, 1995 SIGNATURE:
O RBGARDING INVIRCNMFNTAL 00QNCGEE3RNS WELCCbE AT THE H[FARIlVG.
~
~
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII.,DING AND PLANNING, 2nd Floor, West 1026
Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's
appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to
make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the
specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Depattment of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Health
3. Spokane County Health District
4. Spokane Counry Division of Engineering
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Parks Department
7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council
9. WA State Department of Transportation
10. Spokane Transit Authority
11. Central Valley School District
12. Modern Electric Water Company
13. Fire District No. 1
~
s •
I ~
'i
~lr •
ai
j
ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SPOKANE
SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
,
SPOICAKE Et(YIROlQ1EKT11L ORDINIUICE
cyAc 197-11-960) seccson 11.10.230(i) RECEIVED
MAY051=
Environ+ental Che[kltst
Purpose ot C1KCklist: aPOKZI~V 1&JJ-Ll'
PLANNINO DEPARTMENT
The State Envirorwental pollcy Att (SEPA) thapter 43.21C RGW. requlrez a11 governmental agencles to constder the envtromiental Irmacts of a proposal
before makinq Aecisions. M Enrironwntal Ispact Statenent (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals wlth probaDte slgntficant adverse lnpacts on
tAe awlity of the envtronnent. TAe purpost af th1i chetkllst 1s to provtde tnfonaatlon to helD you and tAe aqency identify tmpacts from your
propozal (anE to reduce or avoid i.patts froe the proDOSaI, if 1t can be done) anE to Aelp the agency declde whether an E1S is redulred.
Instruttlons for Applicants:
Th1s environvental checklist asks you to Cescrlbe saoe Das1c tnformatton •baut your proposal. Governwntal aqencles use thts checklist to deter+ntne
aAetAer the environmental iapacts ot your proposal are signifltant, requtrln9 preparition of an EIS. Answer the Questlons briefly, ritA tAe most
precise lnformation knawn, or glve tAe Dest descriptton you can.
You must •nsver each qvestlon •ccurately and caretully. to the best ot your knowledye. ln wost cases. rou shoulE De able to ansrer the questlons
frow your own observatlons or profett plans ritAout the need to htre ex0erts. tf you really do not knor the •rtsrer, or tt a Questton does not aDD1r
to your proposal. tirlte 'do not knar' or •does not appty,' Ca+plete ansvers to the Qutstlons ncM way avoid unnecessary Eelays later.
Soae questions ask about qovern.ental requlations, such as zonlnq. shoreline. anE landaark desl9nations. Answer tAese questtons tf you can. If you
have problews, the 9orernwnta1 agenctes can assist you.
The checklist Questions apply to a11 parts of your proposal, even 1f you plan t0 do then over a perloA of tlnie or on Elfterent partels of land.
AttacA any additional lnfonmetlon tAat vitl destrtbe your proposal or 1ts envlronnental effects. The agency to rhlch you subatt thts checklist ruy
ask you to explaln your ansrers or provfde adCltlonal 1nfortaatton re.so Mely relatcd to detemining tf there may De slqntficant adverse tspact.
Use ot checklist for nonproject proposals:
Coapiete tAis checklist tor nonproject propossls, even tl+ouqh questions may De ansvered 'does not aop1y'.
IK IlD0ITI0N. ca+plett the SUPPLEMENTlII SHEET FOR NO!1PROJECT ACTIOMS(Part 0).
for nonproject actions, the refertnces tn the checklist t0 tAe werdi 'Droject," sapplltant,' enE 'property or sttt' should be read •s 'proposal,'
'oroCoser.• and 'affected geographlc area.' respectlvely.
A. eACKGR0UN0
1. 'faw of proposeE project. 1f appllcable:
2. Mame of Applicant: Blll Lc3WSOIl
3. Address anE phone nwCer of applicant or tontact person: 202 E Trent, $Dp}S,aI1Q, WA 99202
9il1 - (509 ) 624-117Q
4. o.ce checklist prepared: 1 1 QQS
,
s. Ayencr Kquesciny cneckii:c: SpOkane County Planninq Department
6. oroposed tlaing or schedule (Intludlnq phnlnq, 1f spp1fCaOle):
100 room motel - construction late 1995. oompletion.sumner 1996
Retail office building (20,000 Sq. Ft.) - begin construction 1996, oomplete 1997
100 room addition/motel - 1997
7. a. Oo rou have any plans for future additlons, expansion, or further •ctlvlty related to or comected r1tA this Droposai? lf yes, explain,
* See P,boVe
D. Do you o+en or have optlons on land nearDy or adjacent to this proposal? lf yes. explain. NO
8. Ltit any environtntal informatlon you knor aDout Lhat haf baen prepared, or rill be prepared. dlred ly related to this proposal.
* See attached Level 1 audit
Rev.2/1/88 ~
~ ~ ~ • ~
9T0[AfIE LPfVIRORlQNLL ORDIAMCL
(YAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
B1C1CC1;paM ( cont lnued ) 9, po you kaw vhether applicatiooa •re peodina tor soverniiental apqrovals ot ochet ptoporal• direetlr affectlna the property covered by your
proposal'. It 7es, e=p Lin.
njnnP known
10. List ao7 sovcrnseos •pprovals or penics chat wiLl be naeded Eoc 7ouc ptoposal, if imow.
Spokane County building codes - building permits
Spokane County Engineers - approach and "208" permits .
Spokane County Utilities - sewer permits
t~i~, 4(c, .
Spokane County Planninq Dept.- rezone to B-3
11. Gire • brief, casplece description of 7rour pTOpOMl, ineluding the proposed uaes •nd the slse ot the project and~ sLce. -herc ~re se al
Questions Ltec lo thim checklist tfiat ast you co deserlbe certain up+ets of Tour proposal. Yw do not ceed to cspaac chose aeuvers o~ ~his
page.
Rezone of approximatelv 4 acres fran UR 3.5 to B-3 to allow for
construction of a 200 room motel, 20,000 Sq. Ft. retail office building,
other uses allowed in the B-3 zone.
1:. 4ocation ot the Droposal. Givs •ulficient ln[oeaatioe tor a person to understand the precise location ot rou[ pcoposed pro)ec[, including •
screec addresa, tf sn7, and aectlon, taveu hip aod can`e, ii ki►ovn. I[ a propo" ! vould occur over a range of area, provtde the range or
bouadarles of the sice(a). Provide • legal description, si[e p L n, vlcini q ssp, and topographic aap, tf reasonably evat L ble. Vhile you
rhould aubel[ any p Leu requlved by the •Sency, you •re noc reQuired co duplicate saps or detailed p L no sulaicccd vtth •nr pereit •pplication
reLced co cRls checlcltsc.
The N.E. corner of Pines Road and Mission Avenue currently occupied
by-the -Spok&ine Vallev Seventh Dav Adventist Church and adloininq school.
See attached survev, leQal description and site plan. .
,/1~ t~ •1~~i1 /~1 % 1.~'l'
. . ~ l: y~ l ~y~'►
~ qy,~
/
17. Does the proposed •ecton lie vtthin the Aquiter Sertilcire Arsa (ASA).' -1r Gneral Sewr Servlce Area' :T+e Prlority Serer Ssrvtce Acea' 'he
Gity of Spolune? (See: Spokane Councy's ASA Overlar Zone AtL• !oe Dovndaries).
P,SA- - Yes, GSSA - Yes
~
-o ec coPUI.Mn eT Arn.tuxr
b. CRVIR019.`QN"JL Cl.a'LLTtI'S £valuation For
• 116enc7r Use Only
1. EAR'ft
A. General descriptlon ot the site (circle ooe): f L[. rollicg, hi117. stee0 •lopes, omntainws,
other:
Site slopes at North and West boundaries to meet roads.
,
D. 'fiat 1• the steepest •lope on the •ltt (approxisace percent slope)'
45°
c. 14fut seneral cYpeS of soil• are found on the •ice (for sxaaple, clay, wod, aravel, suct)'
~
If you knov che classlfiucion of agriculcural soiL, •pecifr thau and ooce •nr priire fareLnd.
S 7a1 7 e..
/
d. Are there surface lodieatioos or historr of unstable soil• Sn the tstdiatt vieiaity? If 60,
de st ri be .
~ None Known
i
z
,
SPOKANE ENYIROfME!(TAL QROINA!!CE
(wAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1)
8. ENVIROMIENTAI EIEHENTS(continued)
' Eveluation For
e. Describe the purpose, tppe. and approxiaate Q w ntltles of any f1111nq or 9rading proposed. Agency use onlr
Irdicate source ot fill.
None contemplated
f. Could eroslon o a ur as a result of clearlny, constructlon. or use? if so. qenerally descrlbe.
Yes, but because the site is veiy flat, it is unlikely .
erosion will occur.
q. About what percent of tAe site M111 be tovered rlth taipervtous surtates atter project tonstrvt
tion (for exanqle. aiphalt or buildingS)? ,
See attached $ite plan.
. ~
..*7 G~
,.0
d ~J
h. Proposed weasures to nCutt or Control eroston, or other ispatts to the earth, 1f any:
The site is ve,ry flat and it is unlikely erosion
will occur.
2. ata ~
a. Yhat type of enissions [o the atr rould result fram the proposel (1.e.. Cust, auta+abtle, oeors ~
industrial. rooO saoke) during tonstruttton and rhen the pro,}ett ts ConpleteE? If any.
generelly describe •nd give approxtmatt Quantltes if known.
Dust emi.ssion during deinolition and new construction.
Auto and truck exhaust during construction, auto
extlaust upon completion D. Are there any off-slte sources of eelsslons or oEor t1+at niay affect your proposal? If so,
generalty Gestrlbe. A ~
None Knowm
~
c. Proposed measures to redute or tontrol eM sstons or other taqacts to air. 1f any:
Develoq=p anticinate woorkinQ with Snokane Countv.
to coordimmte traf f ic f low in and out of site to
minimize air pollution.
, - dwe S
' / _ L rJ~
y ~
3. 41ATER
e. Surface: •
(1) Is there any surface water boCy on or In the imiediate vicinity of the slte lncluding yee
round and seasonal streams, saltw ter, lakes, ponds, vetlanCs)? lf yes. describe type anC
proviEe names. 1f approprlate, state rhat stream or r1ver 1t flows tnto.
None Known
(2) Wtll the project requlre any wrk over, in, or adjacent to (vithln 200 teet) the descrlbed
raters? If yes. please describe and attach avallable pians.
None Known
3
3•~5
?_ff,,42
. srvrANZ trrvix0e003VTAL otnmARM
('aAC 197-I1-960) Seccioa 11.10.270(1)
D. QiV1AOfRQ11'fAI. CLLlQI-.S (coetinved) ' •
, Lvaluation For
Aaenc7 Uoe Oo17
(1) Estiwte iM asvuoc of [ill aad dredge macerlal tlut wuld be plaeed Lo or ramovsd trou ths
•urtace vacer or vecLnds aod lodiute the arn of tl+e site tl+rt vonld bs aitected. Iedicate
the swree of [ill material. ,
None contemplated ,
(4) Yill the proposal ceaulre •urtace rter vithd nval& or diversionO Ciw •=eceral demctip-
tion, purpose, and spptoxfaate auautitias. 1t tnov4.
None contemolated ,
(S) Doom the proposal lie vithie a 100ryear tiaod plaioT I[ so, note loutfca oe the site p Ln.
Not to developers knowledge
(6) Doe• the propo"l lnwlve sery diseharges of vu te mterial• to surlaee vaterO I[ go,
deacribe che type of wste aad antieipatod volum of discharte.
None contemplated
b. Ground:
(1) Vill `roundvater De vithdrava. oT Will vstst be dischatfe4 to troundvster'. Ctra geaeral
description. purpose. •nd approsivate auaatities, lf Imovn.
Domestic water service will be throuqh consolidate
Irrictation District. No direct discharae into crround
watPr_ is conf=lated
(2) Deseribe vaste aateriai that rill be discharged into t!r grouod trom •epcic tank• or other
"oicary vaste tr"aMnt [aeility. Deaerib* cAe general •i:e of che g7rmcs, che oumber of
houses to be serred (it applicaple) or the number of persoor tM syscoo(s) •re eqeeted to
serve. .
All waste water will be discharcxed in Spokane County
Sewer system. 200 room motel, 20,000 Sq. Ft. retail
of f ice, * See question # 11
(3) Oescri6e aar eystems, otl+er tlun those designM [or the dispoaal of waitae7r v"ts,
lnstalled for the purposs of diseksarslos lluld@ belov tf►s grouod surface (laclude* eyetas• sueh
as chose for the disposal of •torm vater or dralaaet Erm Eloor drmina). Dasttibe the t79e of
syatea. che amouot of material to De disposed of thcou=h the •rstes and the typee of material•
likslr to be dispossd of (lacluding titetial• vhieh aay eocer tlti hstsmi leadM rtently through
spills or a• • result of titeflghtios aetivities).
A11 surfaQe water drajnage on new co struction anci new
paved areas will be discharared in Spokane Countv
approved "208" drainage ponds prior to draini.ng into
drywells.
(4) Yill anr cheaiuls (espeelallr os=anie wlvmot• or pacrolew fwls) be •to«d !n abow-
Sround or ua"rgrouad scorags tadut II so, vhat cypes aod auantitie• of aateriaL vill be
storcd?
Only those amounts needed for operation of motel
and of f ice bui ldi.ng
~
zLro '~sovq5
. . STOlU11L II1VI1011lQ1f'M OtDIAMCL
, (yAC 197-11-960) Sectioo 11.10.230(1)
E. LAPIRpNlMAL GLJDU7RS (contimaed)
evaluation For
Ageac7 Use Only
(5) iJhat proteetlve measure• vill be takea to insure that Iaiu or spill• oi an7 chedeals
stored or used on site vl11 not be •11oveE to percolate to grwndvater (thls includes eusure•
to keep cheaicals out ot disposal sysceus described in 7D(2) and 3b(3)'
c. Water Runoff (includit►s stoco vacer):
(1) Describe tAe souree of rvnoff (including storm vater) •od satbd of colleetion and disposal ,
if any (include quanti[les, if knovn). HTu re vill chls vnter tlov! Will this water tlov into
othcr vaters? If so, describe.
(2) :Jill anr ehesieals be stored, haed ltd or wed oe the site tn a lou tioe vhere ••pill or
leek vill drain to surface or 6roundvater or co a ston water disposal @yet s disehar`in` to
•urface or grovndvateT? ,
1F^•':~
~
(J) Could vasce materials enter around or surface watersT If •o, 6enerally deserlbe. 01
d. Proposed measnres co reduce or contTOl surface. Sround. and rvnoff water tapacts. lf &ny (if
c [he proposed •ctioa lies vithin tAe Aquifor Sensitive Aru Le •opecially clur on explaoatloos
r relatlc►a to faeiiltle• concernies= Seetion• 3D(4), 3E(S), a04 3c(2) o( thl• cMckllst): oll
,
a . Puvrs
a. f'heck or circle type ot ve;etatian found on the site:
deciduous [ree: alder, eaple, aspan, ocher.
a
ever;reen tree: tir, eedar, pine, otl►er. L~~^
shcv bs. ~(fv
grsss.
pasture.
i~ -
crop or gralo.
vet soil pLats, eattail, buttereup, bullrwh, skuok u bbage. otler.
wter plants: water lillr, aelgrass. silioll, otler. 00f-
other typs• of +eEttation. r ``/L ~
G/ 4-1f
E. Vhac kirtd and asouat of ve`etation vill be rmowd or altsred? ~ •~"~l c. Cisc chreatened or eadangsred spee1es Imorn co De on or aear t!w •lta.
d. Proposed laodscapin6, w• of oacive p Lnts. or otAtr ruures to pnseeTe or saAaacY wjetation
on che site, if aay:
S ~
~~•~3•45
' SPOKANE ENVIRORMEKTAL ORDIMANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Settion 11.10.230(1)
B. ENYIRONMENTAL ELETIENT'S (tontinued)
~ . Evaluation For
, • Agenty Use Only
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds anG animals which have been observed on or neer the slte or are knarn to be on
or near the site: ~ f
birds: hewk, heron. esgte, son9birds. other:
mnmmals: deer, bear, elk. besver. other: 4~4
fish: bass, salnbn, trout, herring, shellfish. other:
other:
b. List any tAreatened or enAangered species knovn to be on or neer the SiLe.
c. ls the site part of a nigration route? If so, explain. ! '
~
d. ProposeE neasures to preserve or enhanCe rildlife. if any:
~
5. ENERGr AMD vATURAL RESOURCES
a. uhat kinds ot energy (electric. natural gas. rood store. solsr) r111 be used to meet tAe
t►1! Conrpleted projett's energy neeCs? Dtscrtbe rhether 1t r111 bt used for heating, manufat-
turing, etc. ,
i
h. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy Oy aQjatent proDerties? If so,
9enerally describe.
. ~ /
c. What kinds of energy conservatlon features are inclu0ed tn the plans of this D*oposal? list ~
other propostd measures to redute or Control energy lnpatts. 1f snr: 41
- ~ .
~
7. ENVIRONMENTIIL HEALTH
a. Are there any envlronmental health hazards, tncludtnq exposure to toxlc cheielcals, rlsk ot flre
and explosion, spill, or hazar0ous raste, that cou1C occur as a result ot thts proposal? lf so.
CesCtiDe.
~
;
(1) Describe sDectal enrryency services that mlght be required. _
6
rST41CA1[L IINIRQMairM 4lDLMAN((Z
(stAC 147-11-960} Section 11.10.230(1)
, .
E. C'tiTIhQN4ENLi,I= EIEKEM (continaeed) ~ .
lvalweloa For
A6encr ilae On17
t11V'LR0HML1TTA3. HEAL:~ (eonttowC
(2) Proposed me.ssurer to rcduce as contcal anTiratmeatal haal[h haurda, 1i aay:
Froj ect to canform with all local, state and
Federal environmental lawp and abatement procedures
L' ~y
p. tiaf.ae. ~~'~'e
. , d letl,'z
(1) Wh,at t7P*• oi aotsa exlr[ Sn the arra wfiith aay alfecc ruur prajeet {icr asaeple: ra[tie,
rquiprrnt, opera[iaa, attrer'
.
EX1StlnQ fTE'EWr'~7
(2) Vha[ t7rpes aad levels ai noiae Yaulll bs creatod 6y ar aMVCiated ritR the project an a
ahort-cers or a lone,-tars bi+l■ (ior exasple: [raffic, eor,atructtaa, oparation, otlrr)' Indicate
wruc hours nvf.sc vou3d case fLrom tlsc site.
Durinci d=crlitiQn and const=ctiQn phases addi ional
traf f ic and constructian noises from 7: 00 AM to 5: C►0 FM
Upon completion, noieee wil be fxom additional traffic
during all hours.
(1) Propored measurs to reduct or tvn[cal notse lapacts, li a,n7:
Coordinatian of better traf f ic f low in and out of
` proj ect
8, u►*rD AND saaPEtttsY usE ,
A. Whhst ia the current rsee af the site and ad}acenc propertirs'. •
Coffmercial u:ses, office uses, freewav and minimal
h. ILa s;;`Y4QQ;1UAkf asrieu.l[ure' Ii so, d•rcribe. L
NC3
~
c. Ueeeribe any struecures on the ■ite.
8,000 Sq. Ft. Qf f3.CE?/SChQ01
6FO V V ~7q. Ftw t~~ ~
d. Vill any •cructurer Lt dtaollahrd't I[ so, Mhich'
v
Of f ice,/School and gym ta be demalished
e. V!tiax is the eurrent saraing cL...itic.cian of the sitet
UR ° 3.5 ,
f. 'dhat is the curxeat emprsheosire pLe designatioa af the sLte'
vrban
g. If applicable, vhat la the cutreat Mhorrltnc nesteT pfogrm destasu[ioa cf the ■ite'!
N/A
h. Has an7 parc nf the stse hean tlt"ffied as an 'earirocs+otall' seti+sltive' •rest ii so.
•peexfy• US?.t to Qilr kT1[]wl+edare_ .
i. Appresisately haw a4aa7 PooPle vsruld resid+e er aart io t}w caaplsetd pcorctT
CTp 1V0 PI11p1oyeeS and 2{)0 X'C)Ofll mQtf?l
7 F•2 S. q
. • seowa snvtaom¢Kw. oantKAxa
, (WAC 117-11-960) Sectloo 11.10.230(1)
A. [!(YIILptflQlfTLL 9LJMrT5 (cooclowd) ~ • Svalustloe /or
' ASeaey Us• Only
AppcotiMAtslr i%ov 6407 pOoyle vould the coSplOt64 pcoJSct d1SPLc61 NO RESIDENCES.
k. fcopoead S"Gures to •Told oc r04ucs dloplacOSIGot t8p*ccs. LI anY8
NONE CONTEMPLATED.
l. ►ropoesd M asures tu snaucs tlr propoeal 1o cospaitlbld v1tA Gai41clo4 •od proJsttsd tana w a• •c►d
plon@, t! •nr:
_THE EXISTTrIG AREA U
3,ECOMING HIGHLY DEVELOPED-
COMMERCIALLY TO WEST AND SOUTH OFFTCESI MED
AND FREEWAY TO NORTH
*SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
9. HUtiS ING tze,001
Appro= Latelr Aw ynr ualto wwld ps Pcovld*4. 1t swlT lodlcatAlgh-. •lddl oc
lov-lacore housing. ~
NONET
E. Approaluatelr huw many ualts, t( •nr, rouid !n •llal wtedf lodlutt whet M[ AljA-. olddla-, or
lov-lnco%• Aoustn=.
_ll].Ll]-
c. Pruyuse,f • uoura• lu reduce ur control liouslng Iopecte, •ay:
N/A ,
10. AESTIIETICS
W1IS[ l• tlic talleat hcllht u! •ny pf0Pu64d fcruccucs(6). aot lncludlot •ntemasl Ylyc lo L1te
princlpal e:tertor bulldtng aateciel(s) ptopomedT
50 FEET APPROXIMATELY - EXTEgIQg TO RF. MAS(lNRY aNn
WOOD SIDING. '
V lIlisl vlev• !n tl.s 1~adlata vlclnltr wwid a•ltetad o[ obdl[ut[edI
TNE VIEWS OF 0FFICE BUILDING TO EAST AND 3 NOMFS TO
SOUTN WOULD BE OBSTRUCTF,D. 1//~•l~D ~
c. P[opuecd N&auto• to reducs ur cuotrol wftlwtlc lsyOcte. lI •rrt /
*SEC ATTACHED SITE PLAN.
tl. L1CN: AHU GIJ11l[
'llist cyp• o! Illlltt ot slace w111 t164 proyowl psuduceT :l1yt t1M oI day wuld lt saloly occurT
ALL EXTEH_OR LIGHTING QN NFW CONSTRLICTTQN WTT.T. RF HT(;N pRESSURE SODIUM.
AND WILL BE ALLIGNED TO MINIMIZE Gi.ARE FROM PROiECT_
b. Cuuld llght ot rlacs f[o• t1l• t1u1e1lsJ Pcu.Wct " A 601str lua&cd oc laLOtfOt• ritA v/eNT
NONE CONTLMPLATED.
c. Vitat •xletlog otl-Ott• •wrce• ot llgtit or Illar• yy •tfact ywr pro"oall
EXISTING STREET LIGEiTING.~ . .
~-f
.
d. rruyuasd o"sucas to reduc• us couttol llght •od glage lapects, lf aoyi
FOCUS CXTERIOR LIGIiTING TO FI.OOD PROJECT ONLY.
e
9,0a 3 ~qS
~ sroUn nMRanrUnrru. oRnrnMct I
~ (VAC 197-11-960) Stetioo 11.10.230(1)
S. L11vIR0N4Wi'l►L II.MC1R'S (eonClnwB)
Evalua[ion For
Agenc7 Use Only
12. RECRLI►?ION ~
Vhat deslgnated and infotvl recrucional opportunitie• •re in the Samedlate viclnit7'
River walk. Mission Park
b. yould the propos*d projecc disp Lce anr a:istica recreeitiooal wes' If so, deatrib*.
Existiong ball field to be removed
c. Proposed woun • to reduce or eontrol lapaet* on reersatioo, locluding recrsational opportuci-
tie• co be providwd by the pro}eet or •ppli uat, it •op:
Motel to have exercise room
11. HIS".'ORIC AHD CZJLTVRAL PRLSC1tYA:ION
A. Are cl+ers any places or objeete listed on or propored tor oa[looal. state or local presetva-
tion register• ktwvn to ba on or oert to the sitet If so, aenera117 deserib+.
None known
p. GAnera117r deseriDe aay landmrts or evidenee of historic arcAawlosical. Scientilit or cultural
ieportance Imovn to be on or eu:t to the •ite.
None Known
C. Proposed se&sures to reduee or concrol impaecs, if •ay:
N/A
14. ':fAtiSPOR-ASION
a. Identlfy public stceats and h1EMrays sscvini the •!ta aad daocriDe propoood accew co the
existiaa stre*c iretes. Slwv-oe @ite p Lnx. lt orq.
Interstate 90
.
Pines Road, Mission Avenue
b. I• site curren[1y •erveE br puplie transit' II oot. vtat i• cl+e •ppro:laate discane• t~he~ ,
AtaLe/[ C[aIIa1C •LOQT
Yes
c. nov many parkla6 @paces vould tlr eompleted projeet l+awf Bov maay vould the pro}eet elidoate'
To be added
T t«~
d. Vill the proposal csqulre sa7 oov rwds or •trw ts. or i~pro~sete to r:istina ro+ds ~crMt•
aot including dri.wtiyet If w. =eoerally describe (iodiute vlrtler publlc or priv~~e).
Yes, may require improvements along Miss•ton Avenue
minor effect to Interstate 90
ati0qt
e. Yill the project u" (or occur lo the leadists vieinit7 ot) rter. rail. or air traoaport " ol
If so, aenera117 doseribe.
Yes, all of the above, but mininal effect.
9
Z ~ 3'~5
• . ST01Ulf! QIPItOIRUlRAL OtDIL11(.Z
(YAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11.10.230(1) I
S. IIIVIROflM11'!AL CLEKEi'S (eontivwd)
. ~ Lvaluatioa for
l1`eoq Ose Only
t, Hov aany vehicuLr trips per dar vould bs aenerated b7 the empleted projeet' f ka ~n
LndicaCe vhen paak vould occur.
7. .ooAM to9.ooAM
~~1.1111/ur
4:00 PM to 7:00 PM
. 'A~001~
S. Proqosed sessun• to redue• or eon[rol cranapottatioa ispacts, if any:
.
15. PUSLIG SERVICLS
a. 'Jould the project result in an loeraased ewd tor public aontea• (tor e=ampla, tire proteetion. , 'k
police proceccion, healtA care, schoola, ocher)1 If so, pnera117 descrlba.
No* the proiect will have mino:r effPC-t on these services
b. Proposed •essurss co reduce or eoctrol direet lapu t• on publie serviees, !t aay:
Paying taxes to support these public services
16. l7-IL1:'IES
a. Clrcle ucillties cucrenclr avai L ble a[ the site: •leetrieity, natuta! _as, water, cefuse
service, telept►one, •anitary sewr, •eptlt srstN, otMr.
All o thP ahnvP
b. Descripe the utilictas that ace pcopoead fot [1+e Oroject. clr u[ility providias the ser►ice and
the general conscruetioo •ecivities on tAe sice or in the lardiat• vicinitr vhieh dght be
aeeded. Vdlley CdrbdQP
WWP-Natural qas
Modern Electric-electricity and fire flaw
Consolidated Water - domestic water
U.S. West - Phone
C. SICNATVRL
I, the undersisned, swear under the petrlc7 of perjucy thac the •bo+e n spowas act Mde truthtull) n►d to the best of a7 kaovled`e. I also
understand ctuc, •'+ould there be aor villful aisrep[osenCStlon or v111fu1 laet oi full dleelosure oa ey part, the ••e mar vitl►drav anr
decer=ination of nonsignifieance ttut ic a1sAc isave in relisaee upon thi• elreklist.
D. 5/ 1/ 9 5 ►tOp00lAL Bi 11 Lawson ,
(el.a.. ~rsoc or Typ.)
pTODo~nt: SO~/ ~T... ; 202 E Z`rent
cure)
SO~!_~Z~/t7~1 Spokane, WA 99202
pt,one:
pet.op ca.➢l.ting fon: BZ11 LaWSOTl Date: 5/1 /95
Phont :
rOR S?AT! QSE 0lff.T
Staff ssber(s) revievins cltieklUt: /probable Eased on thi taff revL sv of the llat aad o[ M r ptrtloeet iniottitlan. cAs Kaff:
A. Concludea that tM re aificaci adrerse ispaets and rieeommrod• •detenlw tioo of oone ifnificaaee.
6. Concluds• chat prnDabl• sigailieant adwrse anriroasatal ispacss do asist tos the eurrent yropo"l aod neoreads a aitisacad decee-
aloation oi ooosignitiunce vlth cooditioor.
C. Coneludes that there ara proDabls sianiiicanc •dwrse ae+irommeMal ispaets and sscammends a det:rsioation oi sisnifieasea.
TILZnG !S - l75.00
10
re La *a 3-C?5
.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATIQN:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: S i 1 1 T.awsnn
MAILING A.DDRESS: 202 E Trent
CITY: Spokane STpTE; WA ZIp; 9 9 2 0 2
PHOIVE: 6 2 4-1 1 7 0 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
Spokane Valley S.D.A. Church
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME; I" Columbia NLGGi on Scx-i etv PHONE: ( 5091926-SfiF6
MAILING ADDRESS: 12323 E. Mission
CITY: SPokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99216
PROTECT/PROPOSAL SIT'E AREA (acres or sq. ft) ~..5 Acres
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres br sq. ft.) None
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45103.0220, 45103.0222, 45103.0276
ASSESSOR PA.RCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED None
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N. E. corner of Pi.Aes- and Mission
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3.5
. EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Ghurch and School
PROPOSED ZONING B-3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Falley School District
FIRE DISTRICT #'f ( One )
WATER PURVEYOR ~
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: •
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Business ~ Industrial Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
.
B. LEGALIZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION;
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: N.E. Corner of Pines and Mission
SECTION S. 1/2 of 10 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Mission Avenue
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 60 Feet to 70 Feet
RECEIVED
MAY 0 51995
BPOKANECOUNTY
?WEN-423W915 '4ANNINf3 DEPARTM[NT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIGrv riPPLICATTON Page 2 of 4
I 1 C
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES NO
NAME(S) OF AItTERIAL ROADS Mi --,si nn AvPn„P
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION PROPOSED.
* SPP_ Att-ac-hpcl
EXISTING ZONE(S) UR 3.5 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ B-3
FOR THE FOLLOWIlNG DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STANPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW. ,
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR IIVTEREST IN IT? _
Real property purchase agreement
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Because of the increased camnercial activity alonq
Pines Road, the devel2Fment_ of inedical offices, hospital and apartments
along Mission the site is not very compatable for use asr-a church and
school.
WHAT IMPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTMS? None contemlated; the surrQUnding uses are alreadv
commercial and/or hiQh densitv. •
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? The need for overniqht
facilities close to Valley General Hospital, increase conmercial activity
along Pine, grawth in Valley. ,
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? The site will be screened by landscapinq fran
offices to the East and Southeast. The site is already on sewer.
z~•~~•q5
~
r
?ONE RL- CLASSll~IC:t~iiC,. ,1'l'LICA'I'i0N
• ~
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTML-'NT S'TAFF WITfI
WRITTEN VERIFTCA'I'ION THAT THE APPLICANT IIAS IIAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH T1 ii:
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATIUN SIIALL RF INCOR}'C)RAZT:U
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING nEF'ARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRT(' t A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Nt_>.
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVF) (IJAVE NOT) BEEN Iv1ADL TO MFETOliR m--FI).S
IN PROVIDWG FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITTES FOR FIRF
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULA'IE NOIA'
BECAUSE USE IS NOTDEFTNTTIVE; AND WTLI. BE DFTF.RMINT'n AT Rt1TLDTNG PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDF:
FIRE DISTRICT S1GNA"I'URE/ITILt: UATf'-
WATER PURVFYOR '
A. SATISFACTORY AR.RA.NGEMENjS-F TIC WnTER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVF,) C__ (lrm"F N~P TITr~T Nt-~T)r-
B. REQUIRENfENTS/COMMENTS
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/I' E DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMWARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL RFQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
S IGNATURE/TITLE DATE
,
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELtMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (NAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR TH1S SITE IS
A. COMMENTS: .
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
IiI;ALTN DISTRICT '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAEE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (NAVE NOT) BEEN SAT7SFIED.
A. COMMENTS: I
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION NAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENEizAL RE'Qtiltzp-NlENTs t=UIZ TfIE
PROVISIQN OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TI'I'LE DATE
qr ~
ZZ .,Z,3.
.
.
~?OiVE RECLASSIFICATT kPPLICATION Page 3 of 4
• r
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII,L PROVLDE THE PLA,NNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFTCA'FION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANIVING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT ~
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~
B. ADEQUATE A.RRANGEMENTS LUqt*,*) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEF,T OtTR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRI
PROTECTION PURPOSES. Q
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: f!f ~ ; OR UNABLE TO CALCUL~3 i L
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITTVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUII.DING PERMIT
APPLICATION TTME.
D . REQLTIREMENTS INCLUDE:
c~~~. ~3 2 i - i' ►
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE~E DATE
WATER PURVEYOR A. S ATISFACTORY A.RRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WA'1 ER Ati ll
REQUIREMENTS (tb"T~) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
i
. `
'/-tr~~
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATtJRE E DA'tE /
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
,
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TI'I& DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSTON HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOi-"
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (H VE N T BEEN i~WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ do~ Sa ~a~.~
i
A. COMMENTS: e~o ~~.~~~~a~~, s~ J+Ze Ca►~ ~-c.`-~ -~o St~►~t.~ f i~~ra-~ -e
~ Pay,M~•-( ~1~, ~+-1 9k /
~ b
Z ~ Q ? T~, ~ I fT ; ' ~ T~ . T?=
fli;.~1_.t I1 L)~SI~:I(.1 '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA AL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAV (HAVE NO~L~EN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNA4 E E DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
~ROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY TI-~E APPLICANT.
\
A. COMMENTS:
3
SIGNATURE~I'ITLE DATE
z~-~3•as
~
~:ONjE :ZECLASSIFICATIO,. , u PLICATION Page 4 of
' . f
C.p ~ R III
O 'IF~iC';~.Ii(-)"~
. ~ f`~~' ~+0•,.'4
~
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LIC P) L I_tiTFORNiATIUN
REQUES TED FOR TFE ZO N~,AP 1"TI~N G.ti L L? E-S Ciz I 1'T i ON.
~ ~ 17678
SIGIVED: _ DATE:
ADDRFSS: "Yr, nATE r1l9w PHONE:
ZIP:
PART I V
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AL;THORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SI;VEAR OR AFFLRIN1 UNUER PENALi'YOF PER1L`RY TH
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSL.D
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS VVRITTEN PERMISSION F=ROM T1-IE OWNF:R AUTHORI7ING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
NAME: DATE: S T•~1 S~
ADDRESS: PHONE: -Sr0 6 Z`~'~ 70
~'~~,~,r•'~ W~ ~l~'sLo 2 ZLP: Q~1ZoZ
.
10
SIGNAt4dt L CANT OR REPRESENTATT VE n~~TE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEF(_*~I; NIE ON "I'i-IIS O~~
1994, B Y
NOT
~ -
: NICTAM
Notary Public in and for the State of Washii>>cnn
PUBUC Residing at: ~ A n Q
•
~•i~~'•:?Yt7•~ My appointment expires: ~ ~ ~ e~ i
Oi~WA
.
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY TFE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITIMD: &116 lf-5- FILE
~
DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
1
CI REC
TOTAL FEES:
z -v
~ c
z~ •23-9S
y
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZC3NE RErCLASSIFICATIC3N AYPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATLON:
NAME OF APpLICAN'T'JREPRESENTATIVE: BILL LAWSON ANI] RflBERT BONUCCELLI
MAILING ADDRESS: P. 0. BOX 141449
CITY: SPOKANE STATE: WA ZTF: 9 9 214-14 49
PHQNE: (509) 924-9730 (work) OR (509) 624-1170 MM) (WOR,K)
IF APPLICANT IS 1''dC►T U'WNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER ACJTHORIZATXON
FQR APPLICANT TO SERVE A.S R.EPRESENTATIVE.
SPOKANE VAI.LEY S.D.A. CHRUCH
LEGAL C}W'NER'S NAME: UPPER CQLUMBiA MISSION SaCZETY PHONE: (509) 926--5$66
MAII.ITIG ADL71?,ESS: PINES AND MISSION
cITY; sPaKANE S+rATE: wA ZrF: 99216
.
PROJEc-r,PROFas a.i.. srTE AREA (aCfes or Sq. ft) ~ gt ACRF,~
ADJACENT AREA OW'NED C?R CC}NTR.C7LLED (acres Qr sq. ft.) NCINE
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S aF PRC3JECT/PR4PO5AL 45I03.0220, 45103.0222, 45103.0276
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF AD7AGENT AREA OWN~ED OR CQNTRQLLED NONE
STREET A.I)DRESS OF PAOPUSAL N. E. COR.NER P INES & MZ S S xON
EXISTING ZC►ItiTE CLASSIFICATIC3hi(S) (DATE ESTABLISNED) 8-2 & UR-3. 5
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY CHURC~ AND SCHQOL
PROPfJSED ZUNING B-3
C(aMPFLEHENSPv'E PLAN CATEGURY MAJC3R COiKMERCIAL AND i]RBAN
SCHC}OL DISTRICT CENTP.AL VALLEY SCHQQL DISTRICT
FIRE DTSTRZ+CT #1 (ONE)
WATER PUkVEYOR
PRUP(7SEI7 USE QF PROPERTY: Singie famiIy dwellings I7uplexes t) Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Business ~ Induscnal Niixed Use
4ther ~ } - Descri be:
LIST PREVIUUS PLANNTNG DLPARTMENT ACTrONS IlVVC}LVII'VG THIS PftOPERTY:
B . LEGALIZQ E RECLA~,.~IF'IC,ATION J~YF'ORMATION-.
LC3CATIC)N Qfi pF:{3Ft7SAL: N.E. CC3RNER PINES & MISSION
SEC I'inN S.~ 10TOWNSHIP 25 RA.NGE 44
NAME oF pUBr..,rc RQAD(s) PROvrDrNG AccEss: Mrss~~~ AVENUE
WIDTH OF FR+QPER.TY FR.ON`I'ING pN FUBLIC RUAD: 60 FEET TD 70 FEET
ZON-L RECLASSIF'ICATICJN APPI,ICATION Page 2 0f 4
D+OES THE PR4P4SAL HAYE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNE-D ART'ERIAL YES NQ
NAME(S) OF ART'ER[A.L ROADS MISSIdN ALTENLTE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIQN QF PRdPERTY FQF EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPJSED.
* 5EE ATTACHED
EXISTING ZQNE(5) B-2 & UR-3.5 TO PRUPOSED Z(7NE(S)_ B-'3
FClR THE FOLLOWTNG DESCRIBEIJ
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIlP'I`IDN STANPEL BY LAND SURVEY4R C}R FRt7VIDE
BEL{7W.
IF YOU DO NOl HOLD T`ITLE TO 1HE PRQPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR ZNTEREST IN IT?
REAL PRClPERTY PLTRCHASE AGREEMENT
WHAT AARE THE CHANGEU CaNDITIaNS QF THE AREA Vv'HICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PRQPOSAL WARRANTED? BECAUSE OF THE INGREASET1 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY ALqNG
PINES ROAD, THE DEVELOI'MENT OF MEDICAL OFFTGES, HQSPITAL AND APARTMENTS
ALQNG MISSION THE SITE IS NQT VERY CC3MPATABLE FQR USE AS A CHURCH AND ,
SCHQQL.
WHA'T IMPACT WII,.L T'HE FRQFOSED ZQNE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE CC►N THE AD.TACENT
PROPERTIES? --NQNE CQNTEMPLATED. THE SURRdUNDING USES ARE ALREADY
CC? /oR xIGH DENSITY. •
WHAT FACTORS SUFPflRT THE ZONE R.ECF.ASSIRCATX+aN? TU NEED FOR (7VER,NIGHT
FACILITIES CLOSE TO VALLEY GENERAL HQSPXTAL, INCREASE CUMMERCIAL ACTZVITY
ALONG PINES, GROWTH YN VALLEY.
W HAT NIEASUR.ES DO YOU PRUP4SE TO MITIGATE 1'OUR PROPOSAL'S ImFACT fJN
SURRQUNDII`IG LAND C7SE7 THE SITE WILL BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPTNG FRaM
OFFICES TO THE EAST AND S+DUTHEAST. THE SITE IS ALREADY ON SEWER. THE DEVELQPER
I5 WQRKING WITH WASHINGTON STATE D.Q.T. AATD SPOKANE CpLTNTY ENGINEERS TO MITIGATE
ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC GENERATED BY SAID RE-Z4NE. THE DEVELOPER AGREES TO RESTRICT
ENTRY TO SITE AL(3NG MTSSION WIT'HIN APPRCIXZMATELY 25(} FEET EAST OF PINES RQAD.
. .
ZUI~ RECLASSIFTTCATTC)N APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 -
4
PART 11
THIS SECTI4N QF THE APFLICATIC)N WILL PRQVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFFWITH
WRITTEN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APFLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTA'TION WITH THE
AGENCIES II3ENTiF~I7. RESULTS C7F THE PRELIMLNARY CONSLJLTATIQN SHALL BE INC(]RPQRATED
IN THE PRUPC7SAL BEFC?RE FINAL SUBIvXITTAL Td THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALLIFZRE DISTRZCT
A,. THIS PROPC7SA.L IS WITHIN F'IRE PRUTECTION DISTRICT NU. ~
B. ADEQUA,TE ARRANGEMENTS UlAt;W} (iEiAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET QUR NEEDS :
IN PROVInING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILIMS FOR FIRE
PRQTECTIUN PURPaSES.
C. RECC}MMENDED FIlRE FLC►W: i134) ; OR UNABLE TC► CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFII*ITT'IVE; AhiD WILL BE DETERMIiNED AT BiITL.LING PERMIT
A.FPLICATIC}hI TIME.
D . REQUIREMENfiS INCLUDE:
FrzE r IsTRrcT s IGrtir~~ ITz.E D,aTE
WATER PURVEYOK
A. SATISFACTOR`l ARRANGEMINTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQLTIREMENTS (HAVE NOT) BEEN NiADE.
8. REQUIREMENTSICOMMENTS:
I y ~ i
LWATER DISTF~ICT SZGNA~ ftE DAtE 'CC3U1"dTY ENGINEER '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENT'S FOR ROADS
AND DRAiNAGE HA,VE IIEEN DISCUSSED WXTH THE APPLICANT.
' A, COMMENTS:
.
3-Z~~ ~
SIGNAT[JF.EI'TT E DATE
C4UNTY UTILITIES
A FRELIMINARY DISCUSSTON HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQLTIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAI. OF THIS PRC7P'OSAL (HAVE) (H►`~ VE N T BEEN ~TISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ ~•c., ~ ~ ~ 4 • ~
A. . COMMENTS :
e° r ~f flr►t * ~ ~ A~. c~ ~ gk
,/k¢ As
~ szGNATUREnY~~ ~ATE
HEALTH DISTRIC"T
A PRELTMLNARY DISCLTSSI4N HAS TAKEN PLAE' AL REC~UIREMEI`dTS FOR
SLTBNiITTAL ~JF THIS PROPflSAL (HA'V (HAVE 1VOp B Eiv 5,4TISFIED.
/ f
A. COMMENTS :
`
4
szG~v~. E E DA
~
sEwER PuRvEYaR
APRELTMIT[ARY DISCUSSI4N HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL. REQUTREMENTS FOR THE .
~?ROVI5T0N PLTBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERS~"OfJD BY THE APPLICAN~'.
~
A. C(7M-MENTS:
SIGNATIJRF-CTITLE ` DATE
f ,
ZONE IrZECLAS S IFICATION A.PPLICATTON . , • ~ Page ~ or 4
PART ZIZ
xEFcATIoN
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A L HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZO AL DESCRIPTiON.
SIGNED:
DATE:
ADDRESS: s,~~~~ cp1 PHONE:
~ALU~ w,~ ZIP: R9.Zlk`Z,
PART ZV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LET'I'ER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED 'FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FR4M THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
cg 4
NAME: &45F7~1-q- DATE: :3;~/q 5-
~ -t_`
ADDRESS: / • ig • ~ fix ~ ~lq-qq PHONE:
zlP: q 9~ i~-
~
SIG~VATL . OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE ~ DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRNiED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
mx'64 1-~ BY
g 01~
\SStion F+.G'~•~
.r ~
` ~ 4~••` ♦ ~
NQ~~ MY
P~B C,~ : z Notary lic in and for the State oE Washington
i t j,.E`~ , q,~ •Z►~
~i 0 ti..~~Residin at:
~~~/~~F WA~~My appointment expires:
1{tl ~
PART V
(I'O BE COM_PLETED BY THE PLA-NNING
DATL SUBMITTED: FILE
DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
7-ONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
TH1S SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMEN? STAFF WITH
WRITIEN VERIFICATION THAT TH.E A.PPLICANT HAS tIAD PRFLTMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAYE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEFT OL1R NFFD'~
IN PROVIDWG FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AT1D FACILITIES FOR FIRF
PROTECTION PUR.POSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CAL.CULA iL:N*u",`,
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIIVITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT IIUILDING PERMIT
A.PPLICATION TIME.
D . REQLTItEMENTS TNCLUDE:
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNf1TUREffl"I'LE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY A.RRAIVGEMEN TIC VVnTER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (NAVE) IiAVE NO BEEN MADE.
R . REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
s
1,9
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/I' E DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICAN"T'.
A. COMMENTS:
S IGNATUREfITTLE DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (FIAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS
A. COMMENTS: .
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
,
1iLALTtI DISTRIC7'
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAEE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERnL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATUREfI'I"IZ.E DATE
_J
. ~
- . . • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICA'I'ION Ai'PLICATION
~
pART I
A. CiENERAL. _INF~RMAT'IQN
NAME OF APPLICANTIREF'RESENTA,TIVE: BILL LAWS4N AND ROBERT BClNUCCELLI
MAILiNG ADi7RESS: P. o. Bax 141449
CITY: SPQKANE STATE. WA ZIP: 99214-1449
PHC3NE: (509) 924-9730 (wosk) 2R (509) 624--1170 OM} (W(3ftK}
IF APFLICANT IS Nt)T QWNER, INGLUDE 'VYRITTEN qWNER AUTHpRIZATIOt''d
F()R APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATYVE.
SPOKANE VALLEY S.D.A. CHRUCH
LEGAL OWWER'S NAME: UPPER COLUMBIA MISSIQN SOCIETY FHOhIE: (509) 926-5866
MAILIN'G ADDRESS: PINES ANI] MISSION
CIT"Y: SPOKANE STATE: WA ZIF: 99216
PR[)JECT/PROPC?SAL SITE AREA (acres or st}. ft) _4,,9± 4CRES
ADJACENT AREA C)WNEI3 OR CC}NTROLLED {acres ar sq, ft.} NONE
ASSESSOR FARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROP'C)SAL 45103.0220, 45103.0222, 45103.0276
AS5ES5QR PARCEL #'S OF ADIACEIVT AREA C)WNED OR CONTR(]L,LED NONE
S"IREET ADbRESS OF PROYC3SAL N.E. C4RNER PINES &MTSSION
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISNED) $--2 & UR-3. 5
EXISTING USE OF FRQPFRTY (;HURCH ANU SCH4OI.
PROPUSEL? ZONTNG B-3
COMPREHENSTVE PI.AN CATEGflR.Y MAJQR COMMERCIAL A.ND URBAN
SCH44L I7ISTRICT CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
FTRE DISTRICT #1 (ONE)
W ATER PUFt VEYOR.
PRC3POSED USE OF PROPERTY: •
Single family dwellings Duplexes Mu1tiFamily dwellings )
Manufaetured hornes Business ~ Industrial Mixed Use
Othcr ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIQUS PLANNING DEPARTNfENT ACTIQNS II`dVC?LVING THIS PRQPERTY:
. . +
~LF()TtNiATiQN:
B . LEGALIZONE HEfLA~SI_FIC:AII0I Ir
LOCATIUN OF PRaP4SAL: N.E. CORNER PrNES & MISSION
SEC"I'IC}N S. j 10 TQWNSHIP 25 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLTC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: MISSION AVENUE
WII7TH OF PRCJPER'I'Y FRONTING C}N PUBLFC R.C]AD: 60 FEET TO 70 FEET
?ONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
, ?
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICAT70N WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (IiAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROYIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TTME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: .
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQIJIREMENTS (IiAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
WATER DISTRICT SIGNA E XE DAt
COUNTY FNGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION IiAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
1 ~
S IGNATURE/TITtE DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (NAVE) (HAYE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR TFiIS SITE IS
A. COMMENTS: •
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMIIVARY D[SCUSSION IIAS TAKEN PLAEE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURErTITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY TIIE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATUREfI'ITLE DATE
.
. . *
~cRMIT CENTER PASSPORT
v Date: Number. ~
Name Phone
. . C~ C-5 C__ E = L, ~ 1
Address
Comments: b
CUSTOMER ROUTING -
-
~ 6UILDING Department - I PIANNING Department ~XENGINEER'S Departrnerrt
.
i Addressing ~ Admin. F.xception i Approach Permit
i Building Permit _ Arterial Rd Plan Info ~ Nlood Piain Permit
_ Code Information _ Binding Site Plan Info _ Public/Private Roads
i Commercial Review ` Cert. of Exemption _ Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
i Conference _ Comprehensive P1an i Site Drainage Info
~ Energy Code Info ~ Cond. Use Permit _ Subdivision Review
_ Fire Safety Review i Nonconforming Use i Utility PerTnit .
Manufactured Home i PerTni t Review Zone Change Review
Mechanical Permits ~ Shorelines Info ~ q~~
~
Other Permits Short Plat Info AReVZwe FEE REQUIRED
Tune out
Plumbing Permits Sutlivision Info ~ I
! Private Road Info ~ Temp. Use Permit ~ I UTILITIES Department
s Residential Review i Variance Appl. ~ APA Payment
Sewer Permits Zone Check Cert. of Exemption
Zone Info Sutxiivision Review
ULID/Sewer Info
Zone Change Review
NO FEE REQ UIRED NO FEE REQ UIRED
Reviewer Time out Reviewer Time out Reviewer Time out
I
Mws7F.xWwsspoRI.cTx 2/1&193
I
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9500413 DATE: 03/21/95
~ . • r
APPLICANT: ROBERT BONUCCELLI PHONE=
ADDRESS: P O BOX 141339
SPOKANE WA 99214
CONTACT NAME: ROBERT BONUCCELLI PHONE=
TRANSACTION: ZONE CHANGE, LAND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAL DUE = 220.00
TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
03/21/95 00002037 CASH 220.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU