ZE-37A-96
j~ Ae
RECEIVED
~
sPoKAvE co~~ HEARIN~ EXAMINER SEP 0 520Q1
SPOi4ANE CpUNTYENNGI
RE Change of Conditions to a Pnor Zone )
Reclassificanon, in the Light ) FINI)INGS OF FACT,
Industnal(I-2) Zone, ) CO1VCI,USIONS OF I,AW,
Applieant Mirabeau Point, Inc ) AND DEGISION
File No ZE-3 7A-96 )
}
This matter corrung on for publlc hearvng on 3une 20, 200 1, the Heanng Examiner, after
review of the chan.ge of conditions applicatton and the entire record, and findmg good cause
therefore, hereby makes the fo11ow1ng findings of fact, conclusions of law and decYSlan
I FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The apphcahon requests a change of condrtions to a pnor zone reclassification to the Light
Industrial (I-2) zone
2 The site is generally located west of and adjacent to Mirabeau Parkway, east of and
adjacent ta Discovery Place road, and south of Muabeau Parkway (Euclid Avenue), in the NE 1/4
of Sechon 10, Townsh.ip 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
3 The site consists vf that portion of County Assessor's tax parcel no 45145 9096 rezoned to
the I-2 zane m File No ZE-37-96
4 The apphcant for the proposal is Mirabeau Pomt, Inc, c/o Sue Laru Madsen, P 0 Box 182,
Edwall, WA 99008 The owner vf the site xs Inland I`Torthwest Land Trust, 315 East Mission
Avenue, Surte SA, Spokane, WA 99201
5 The Heanng Examiner heard the apphcahon pursuant to the County Heanrig Exammer
Ordinance (County Resolution No 96-0171) and the County Heanng Examiner Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294)
6 A pubhc heanng was held on the proposed change of condition on June 24, 2001 The
requirements for pubhc nohce of heanng were met
7 The followYng persons testxfied at the publtc heanng
Tammy Jones Sue Laru Madsen
Division of Plaluung P C) Box 182
1026 West Broadway Edwall, WA 99008
Spokane, VrVA 99260-0244
8 The County Divlsion of Planiung issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the
proposal on June 1, 2001
HE Fmdmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-37A-96 Page 1
S
9 The Heanng Examiner takes notice of the County Comprehensive Pla.n, the County Zontng
Code, other applicable development regulations, and recent land use decisions in the vicinity
14 The record includes the documents in File Nos ZE-37-96 and ZE-37A-96 at the time of the
public heanng, the documents submitted at the public heanng, the Zetter dated June 21, 2001
from the Hea.rmg Examiner to Sue Laru Madsen, and the rtems talcen nottce of by the Examiner
11 The subJect site is approxunately rune (9) acres in size, generally flat in topography and
covered with native vegetation Access to the site is from Discovery Place Road
12 Un August 17, 1999, approximately 106 acres of land,lncluding the subject property, were
rezoned in File No ZE-37-96 from the Rural Residential-10 (RR-1 0) zone to the I-2 zone, for
development of recreanonal facilzties, a business park, vanous commerclal uses and those uses
allowed 1rr the I-2 zone The rezone site ulcluded two disconnected pieces of land, i e a
17 3-acx-e north piece Iacated mostly along the south side of Mirabeau Parkway (formerly Euclld
Awenue), and an 88 5-acre south piece located along the north slde of the Uruon Pacific Railway,
on both the east and west sides of Mirabeau Parkway The subject property compnses a north
central portion of the south piece of such rezone site
13 County Planning condition #10 in ZE-37-96 requued the rezone site to be developed
substantially in accordance with the conceptual plan for the overal1229-acre Mirabeau Point
Development submltted on Apn129, 1999 An environmental impact statement was prepared for
the Mirabeau Po1nt Development
14 County Planning condition #10 attached to the rezone decision in File No ZE-37-96
required that the apphcant comply with and unplement the recommendanons contained fln the
Sep#ember 15, 1997 Muabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan, with regard to the
site and certaul aff-site portions of the overall Mxrabeau Point development Tlus included,
without luiutation, reservation of the 44-acre central natural area of the development, provision
for avian buffer zones, and dedieatYOn of 10-11 acres of parkland to the County The owner of
the current slte owTns the 44-acre central natural area
15 The natural area is zoned RR-10, undeveloped except for a senes of wallang trails and
former Walk m the Wild zoo exhibits, has sloping topography and rock outcroppings, and is
covered with native vegetation An 88-acre, undeveloped conservation area owned by the
Washuigton State Natural Resources, zvned RR-I0, abuts the natural area on the west The
Centetuual Tra.il and Spokane River are located a short distance east of the slte Surrounding
land uses also mclude a new YlV1CA west of the site, undeVeloped land, and commercial uses to
the southeast along Indiana Avenue
16 The applicatlon for a change of conditions requests modification of County Plaruv.ng
condirion #10 rn File Nv ZE-37-96, to allow a lunrted number of structures and other
improvements withui the central natural area located north of the cunrent site, uicluding a gazebo,
trellis, a"Fort Muabeau" exhibit, and 12-foot wide paved trails Such improvements are
illustrated on the site plan of recard for the change of conditions, dated IVlarch 14, 2041, but are
not clearly identified The unprovements would be located near the entrance to the former zoo,
wifihin the Ponderosa Pine Woodland identified as wildlife habitat in the 1997 Habrtat
1Vlanagem.ent Plan The 1997 Plan prohiblted structures and pavmg within such habitat
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-37A-96 T'age 2
!
4
17 A document enhtled "Evaluahon of the Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan" dated
March 14, 2001, was submitted by a quallfied consultant retained by the applicant Such
document discusses the changes proposed by the current application and their impact on the 1997
Habitat Management Plan The document indicates that such changes will not sigruficantly
impact the Ponderosa Pine Woodland, since the unprovements will be constructed in an area that
was previously d.isturbed for the former zoo The proposed structures will not be located in the
core of the pXne woodland habitat, which 1s the most sensitive part of the habitat The irails
loeated closest to core of the pine woodland habitat will be either gravel or bark
18 The Evaluation of the Habitat Evaluation and 1VYanagement Plan dated March 14, 2041 was
accepted by the County Division of Planning The Washington State Department of Wildlife
submitted comments stating that the cha.nge of conditions would have only a limited impact on
the pme woodland habrtat, as long as paving did not occur off the existmg soft pafihs, the
proposed structures are constructed on srtes where the former zoo exlubits currently extst, and
there is lunited distu.rbance of existing native vegetatian
19 The srte and surround.ing land are designated in the Rural category of the County
Generalized Comprehensive Plan The site and surrounding land also lie in.side the Aqw.fer
Sensirive Area, Pnonty Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the
Generalized Comprehensive Plan
20 The site and surrounding land are located inside the intenm urban growth area boundanes
designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act
21 The northerly 10 acres of the central natural area adjacent to #he site have beea dedicated to ,
the County Parks Department County Parks also owns the land lying between the natural area
and Mirabeau Parkway, and the land 1}nng duectly south of the site County Parks recommended
approval of the change of condirions, on the basis that it would provide an adjunct to the nearby
Centenrual Traxl, and would provide cultural, educahonal, entertai.nment and recreational
opporttuuties for area residents
22 The apphcant md.XCated fihat the site and the adjacent natural area would be conveyed to
Gounty Parks in the future
23 No opposltion to the proposal, as conditioned, was expressed by neighbonng property
owners or public agencies This includes the owners of the other portions of the ongmal rezone
slte in File No ZE-37-96 As condihoned, the proJect is compahble with neighbonng land uses
23 The proposal wi11 remain subj+ect to the conditxons of approval imposed m File Na
ZE-37-96, except for the new conditions recommended by publle agencies
24 The proposal, as condihoned, will not have a sigruficant unpact on the environment or
~ impact neighbormg properties The DNS issued for the proposal is appropnate
HE Fincungs, Conclusxons and Decision ZE-37A-96 Page 3
9
25 The Staff Report adequately analyzes the consistency of the proposed change of conditions
with the Comprehensive Plan, the development standards of the I-2 zone, and the rezone
conditions in File No ZE-37A-96 Such analysis is hereby adopted and incorporated by
referenee as findings of fact herein
Based on the above findings of fact, the Heanng Examiner enters the following
11 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1 The proposed change of conditions, as conditioned, generally conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan
2 The applicant has established that the proposed change of conditions bears a substantial
relationship to, andlor will not be detnmental to, the public health, safety or welfare
3 The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the Gounty's Local
Enviranmental Ordinance have been met
4 The proposal, as conditioned, complies with the I-2 zone, the County Zorung Cade, and
other apphcable development regulations
5 The proposal meets the cntena established in Section 14 504 040 of the County Zoning
Code for a change of conditions application
6 Approval of the Iand use application is appropnate under the cntena established for the
approval of land use apphcations in Section 11 of the County Heanng Examiner Ordinance,
adopted by County Resolution No 96-0171
III IAECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Canclusions of Law above, the above applicarion for a
change of conditions is hereby appraved., subject to the conditions of the vanous public agencies
specified below
Any changes to pubic agency conditions added or sigruficantly altered by the Examiner are
italactzed
Failure to comply with the conditions of tlus approval may result in revocation of thus
approval by the Hearing Examiner Tlus approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply unth all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over larid development
I-iE Find.ings, Conclusions and Decisron ZE-37A-96 Page 4
1
SPOZ1A1\E COUl\ d Y DI`C IlSION OF 1CLA1\NY1VG
1 The applicant shall comply with and unplement the recommendations contained in the
Niirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan dated September 15 1997 in County
Plannzng File No ZE-37-96 as modified by the Change of Condztion Exhrbit dated March 19
2001 and the Evaluation of the Habttat Evaluation and Management Plan dated March 14
2001 in County Planning File No ZE-37A-96, tn regard to the project site and the off-site
portions of the 229-acre Mirabeau Point Development This includes, without lunitation,
reservation of the central natural area of the development, provlsion for avian buffer zones, and
dedicanon of 10-11 acres of park land to Spokane County The timing of such dedication of park
land shall be determined by the County Parks and Recreation Department, after consultation with
the apphcants and the County Division of Planning
2 The Division of Planiung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, which notes that the site is subject to a vanety of special conditions unposed as a resu0lt
of approval of a land use achon The Title Nohce shall serve as public notice of the conditions of
approval affecting the property in quesnon The Title Notice should be recorded withm the same
hme frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division
of Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows
"The parcel of property legally descnbed as (legal descnption), is the subject of a land use
action by the Spokane County Heanng Exanuner on August 31, 2001, in Planning File No ZE-
37A-96, imposing a vanety of special development condlhons File No ZE-37A-96 is available
for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning "
3 All previous conditions of approval for ZE-37-96 shall remaui in effect
WASHYNGT'ON ST'A'TE DEPAR"I'ME1VT OF FISH Ar1D VVII.Il)LIFE
1 Pavmg withm the footpnnt of the existing trail withm the ponderosa pine woodland will
have a lunited impact on the wnldlife within that sigruficant plant commuruty type No paving
should occur withm this habrtat type off the exishng soft paths
2 Two new facihties (gazebo and Fort Muabeau) will be constructed vvitlun the woodland
Tlus should have luYUted unpact as long as the maJonty of these structures are constructed on
sites where form Walk in the Wild zoo exhibits currently exist There should be luYUted
disturbance to existing nahve vegetahon surrounding these two sites
3 A11 development, other than those above, shall follow the guidelines set by the 1997 habitat
management plan
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-37A-96 Page 5
f 1`
~ y
1
DATED this 31 st day of August, 2001
SPOKAN~ C LTIVTY HE NG EXAIViINER
/ C
Niic el C Dempsey, WSBA #8 5
1V0TICE OF FHNAL DECISIO1V ANI) NOTICE OF 1tIGgIT 7C0 A]PPEAI.
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner
on an application for a change of conditions to a pnor rezone is final and conclusive unless within
twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing
files a land use petition in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter
36 70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is
mailed
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to
other parties of record, on August 31, 2001 The date of issuance of the Heanng Exanuner's
decision is therefore September 4, 2001, counting to the next business day when the last day for
mailuig falls on a weekend or holiday THE I.,AST I)AY F'OR APPIEAL O~ THIS
DECISION TO SiJPERIOIt COiJRT BY I,AVD USE PETYTION IS SEPTEMEBER 25
2001
The complete record in this matter, includmg this decision, is on file dunng the appeal
penod vvith the Office of the Hearing Exanuner, Tlurd Floor, Pubhc Works Buildulg, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be
inspected Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a m and
5 00 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by
Spokane County
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-37A-96 Page 6
dl-
~
l~ STAFF REPORT TD THE HEARING EXAMINER
ii
FILE ZE-37A-96
III ~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOKX~ COUWY
HEARING DATE: June 20, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m. FILE ZE-37A-96
PROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditions to a previously approved zone reclassification
to amend Planning Condition #10 in order to allow structures and paved trails within the interior of
the Ponderosa Pine Woodland, whereas the original conditions of approval prohibit paving and
structures within this area.
Project Data
Project Location: The site is generally located west of and adjacent to
Mirabeau Parkway, south of Euclid Road, in the NE
of Section 10, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
Parcel Number s 45105.9096
Owner(s)/Applicant Mirabeau Point, Inc.
c/o Sue Lani Madsen
P.O. Box 182
Edwall, WA 99008
(509) 236-2311
Com rehensive Plan Designation: Rural
Zonin : Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) and Light Industrial (I-2)
Existin Land Use: Vacant and undeveloped land.
Surroundin Zonin and Land Uses:
• North: Zoning to the north of the site consists of Light
Industrial (I-2) established in 1999 (ZE-37-96C),
previously classified as Rural Residential-10 (RR-10)
in 1991. Land use to the north of the site consists of
vacant, undeveloped land, the Spokane River and the
Centennial Trail.
• South: Zoning to the south of the site consists of Light
Industrial (I-2) established in 1999 (ZE-37-96C),
previously classified as Rural Residential-10 (RR-10)
in 1991. Land use to the south of the site consists of
the YMCA and vacant, undeveloped land.
• East: Zoning to the east of the site consists of Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural (A) in 1942 (ZE-
24-42) and Light Industrial (I-2) established in 1999
(ZE-37-96C), previously classified as Rural
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report - June 20, 2001 Hearing
1 of 6
~ •
Residen#ial-1 0(RR-10). Land use to the east af the
site consists of the Spokane RiWer and the C+entennial
Trail.
• West: Zoning ta the west of #he site consists of Rural
Residential-10(RR-10) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agriculturaf (A) in 1942 {ZE-
24-42} and Light Industrial (I-2) established in 1999
(ZE-37-96C), previously classified as Rura1
Residential-10(RR-10). Land use to the west of the
site consists of vacant and undeWeloped land the
YIIACA..
Known Land Use Proposals and Recent land use prvposals include:
Recent Prvject Approvals in the ZE-37-96; a zvrre reclassification from RR-10 to 1-2
Area of this Project on approxima#eiy 105.8 acres for cammunity facilities,
a business park and those uses a1lowed in the 1-2
zane, lacated adjacent tv and affecting the subject
site, approved by the Hearing Examiner on August
17, 1999.
ZE-5-98f a zone reclassification from UR-3.5 and RR-
10 tv I-1 on approximately 15 acres Iocated west of
adjacent to the sublect praperiy #o the intersection of
Pines Raad and Euclid Ave., appraved by the
Hearing Examiner an November 23, 1998.
ZE-9-98, a zone reclassificatiQn from L1R-3.5 to UR-
22 on 2.15 acres located east of and adjacent to
Pines Rd., approved by the Heasing Examiner an
January 25, 1999.
B5P-48-96, a Binding Site Plan to divide 86 acres
inta f tracts for a Regranal Shopping Cen#er Iocated
eas# of the subject site at the intersectivn of Sullivan
, Rd. and Indiana A►re., and approved hy the D'rvision
of Building and Planning on March 12, 1998.
PE41567-89fZE-3-89, the preliminary plat of BSA
Addition for the diwision of 35 acres into 8 lots for
multifamily and commercial uses with a zone
rec3assification frvm Light Indus#rial (1-2) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22), Community Business (B-2)
and Regional Business (B-3), Iocated narth of the sife
- at the southeas# comer of Pines Rd. and Euclid Ave.
, and appraved by the Hearing Examiner Committee
on February 23, 1989.
PE41504-85, the preiiminary plat of Sullrvan Park
Cen#er, Iocated east of the site and approved by the
Hearing Examiner Committee on November 19,1985.
ZE-180-78, a zone reclassificatian from Agricultural
{A} to Restricted Industrtal {R!} vn 230 acres lvcated
east and sauth of the subject site along Indiana Ave.,
and approved by the Hearing Examiner Cammittee
on March 6, 1981.
tand Uirrision Status: The subject prvperty consists of a tax parcel of
record.
Water F"urve or: Cansolidated Irri atian District Nv. 19
Fire t3istrict S kane Coun Fire District #1
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The site is Ivca#ed approximately 1000 feet east of
' Pines Road (SR 27) which is designated as a S#ate
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report -June 20, 2001 Hearing
2of6
' ~•1
Highway by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan
and approximately 1/3 mile north of Indiana Avenue
which is designated as a Minor Arterial. The site is
also located approximately 400 feet north of
Interstate 90.
• This proposal is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA).
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located outside the notification area for designated Natural Resource
Lands.
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject property is located inside the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone
and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area
(PSSA).
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Spokane County Critical Areas Maps
identify Urban Natural Open Space habitat
located on the site. An Evaluation the
original Habitat Management Plan was
reviewed and accepted by the Spokane
County Division of Planning in consultation
with the Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife.
Floodplain The site is located outside the 100-year
flood plain.
Geologically Hazardous Areas Spokane County Critical Areas Maps
identify the presence of Geo-Hazard areas
on the site. A Geo-Hazard evaluation was
not required due to the fact that the erodible
soils located on the site were addressed in
the Mirabeau Point Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) issued on June
12, 1998.
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
SEPA
A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was issued for the proposal on June 1, 2001, with a comment
period ending on June 18, 2001.
Noticinq
Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
June 1, 2001.
Mailing Deadline: The deadline for mailing notice to all property owners/taxpayers within 400' of the
proposal was June 4, 2001.
Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for posting notice on the site was June 4, 2001.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted: March 29, 2001
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: May 11, 2001
Date Notice of Decision is Due: September 7, 2001
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report • June 20, 2001 Hearing .
3 of 6
t • ' •
Reviewinq Agencies
11 Agencies were notifled on March 30, 2001, and May 23, 2001. Comments were due on April 12, 2001,
and June 5, 2001.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
Received Received Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes 6/5/01 Washington State No
of Engineering and Roads Department of
Transportation
Spokane County Division No Spokane County Fire No
of Engineering, District #1
Development Services
Spokane County Division Yes 6/5/01 Consolidated Irrigation No
of Utilities District No. 19
Spokane County Division No Washington State Yes 4/18/01
of Utilities, Water Department of Fish and
Resources Wildfife
Spokane County Division No Spokane Regional No
of Building and Code Health District
Enforcement
Spokane County Air No
Pollution Control Authority
Responses from the Public:
No public responses were received for the subject land use action.
Description of the Site:
The subject site is approximately 48 acres in size and is bordered on the east by Mirabeau Parkway.
Access to the site is from Discovery Place. The property is the former site of the Walk in the Wild Zoo. The
topography of the site ranges from flat to sloping with numerous rock outcroppings, and the site is covered
with native vegetation. The northern 2/3 of the subject property is to be developed as a natural area with a
series of walking trails. Surrounding uses include the YMCA, Spokane River, Centennial Trail, undeveloped
land and commercial uses to the southeast along Indiana Avenue.
Backqround:
The application was submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning on March 29, 2001. A Technical
Review meeting was held on April 12, 2001. The application was determined to be Technically Complete on
May 4, 2001, and the Notice of Application was issued on the same date with a comment period ending on
May 25, 2001.
The subject property is located within the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners on April 7, 1997, Resolution #97-0321.
The subject site is part of a proposed conceptual master plan for the development of the Mirabeau Point
area. The impacts of the proposed conceptual master plan were addressed through an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) process and a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued for the
conceptual master plan on June 12, 1998. The Spokane County Critical Areas Maps identify habitat in the
form of Urban Natural Open Space located on the subject site. A Habitat Management Plan, dated
September 15, 1997, was included as part of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Mirabeau
Point area. The Habitat Management Plan identifies the rocky woodland located on the north 2/3 of the site
as a Ponderosa Pine Woodland which provides habitat to a diverse wildlife population and is highly
vulnerable to degradation. The Plan includes specific recommendations for the protection of the Ponderosa
Pine Woodland.
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report - June 20, 2001 Hearing .
4 of 6
• •i
An application for a Zone Reclassification, ZE-37-96, for the south 1/3 of the subject site and adjacent
properties to the north, east and south, from the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone to the Light Industrial (I-
2) zone was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 17, 1999. The north 2/3 of the subject site was
not included within the requested Zone Reclassification, however, conditions of approval for ZE-37-96
address this area of the site due to its inclusion within the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the conceptual master plan for the Mirabeau Point development. The Hearing Examiner's Finding
of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision for ZE-37-96 includes the following condition of approval:
Division of Building and Planning Condition #10
The applicant shall comp/y with and implement fhe recommendations contained in the Mirabeau Poinr
Habitaf Evaluafion and Managemenr Plan, with regard to the project site and the off-site portions of the 229-
acre Mirabeau Point development. This includes, without limitation, reservation of the central natural area of
the development, provision for avian buffer zones, and dedication of 10-19 acres of park land to Spokane
County. The Gming of such dedication of park land shall be determined by the County Parks and Recreation
Department, after consultation with the applicants and the Division of Building and Planning.
The purpose of the proposed Change of Conditions is to modify this condition of approval in order to amend
the recommendations contained within the Mirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan to
allow limited structures and paved trail within the interior of the Ponderosa Pine Woodland. The proposed
Change of Conditions to ZE-37-96 is not intended to affect any remaining original conditions of approval.
An Evaluation of the Mirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan was submitted by the
applicant on March 29, 2001. The Evaluation of the original Habitat Management Plan states that the
proposed structures; a gazebo, trellis and "Fort Spokane", and 12' wide paved trails will be located in those
areas near the entrance of the former Walk in the Wild Zoo, and outside of the core Ponderosa Pine
Woodland located near the northwest comer of the site. The Evaluation states that a picnic shelter has
already been constructed on the site. The Evaluation of the Habitat Management Plan was accepted by the
Division of Planning in consultation with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. In a letter
dated April 16, 2001, the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife recommends that with the
exception of the proposed structures and limited paving of existing soft trails, all development should
continue to follow the guidelines set by the 1997 Habitat Management Plan.
Project Description:
The proposed Change of Conditions is for the purpose of modifying Division of Building and Planning
Condition #10 for ZE-37-96 to allow a limited number of structures, including a gazebo, trellis and "Fort
Spokane", and paved trails within the interior of the Ponderosa Pine Woodland located on the site of the
Mirabeau Springs Park project, whereas the original recommendations of the Habitat Management Plan
prohibited structures and paving within this area.
Staff Analysis:
Comprehensive Plan:
The site is located within the Rural category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Rural category is intended to
provide the opportunity for development of agricultural, timber or open environments in a"country like"
setting. The land use within this category is intended to be primariiy very large-lot residential with
agricultural uses or open areas.
Goal 4.2 is intended to encourage a variety or parks and open spaces. Objective 4.4.b recommends the
identification of fragile wildlife areas needing protection and to develop methods for such protection. These
areas should be conserved and made available for education purposes. Decision guidetines 4.4.2 and 4.4.3
recommend the retention and maintenance of unique environmental areas.
The proposed Change of Conditions is generally consistent with Goals, Objective and Decision Guidelines
of the Rural category of the Comprehensive Plan.
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report - June 20, 2001 Hearing
5of6
r . • , ,
Zoning:
The existing zoning of the north 2/3 of the subject site is Rural Residential-10 (RR-10). The proposed
Mirabeau Springs park project and the proposed Change of Conditions is consistent with the allowable uses
and development standards of the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone. The existing zoning of the south 1/3
of the site is Light Industrial (I-2). The proposed Change of Conditions does not affect that portion of the site
currently zoned as Light Industrial (I-2).
Zoning in the surrounding area of the site consists of Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), Light Industrial (I-2), and
Community Business (B-2).
Site Plan:
The site plan of record for the proposed Change of Conditions illustrates the location of both the proposed
and existing trail system and identifies those trails that are intended to be paved. Those trails that are
closest to the core Ponderosa Woodland Area located on the northwest area of the site are identified as
being either gravel or bark trails. The site plan illustrates the location of the proposed structures, but does
not specifically identify the structures.
Staff Summarv:
As proposed, the requested Change of Conditions to allow structures and paved trails within the interior of
the Ponderosa Pine Woodland is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of
the Rural category of the Comprehensive Plan, the allowable uses and development standards of the Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) zone, and the information included within the accepted Evaluation of the Mirabeau
Point Evaluation and Habitat Management Plan.
Attachments:
A. Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Development Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency and Public Comments
ZE-37A-96
Staff Report - June 20, 2001 Hearing
6 of 6
. , • • i
ATTACHMENT A
MAPs
VICINITY MAP
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
~ . • ~
ZE-37A-96
Vicinity Map
~ ~ w 3
Rich Rich
~ ell ~ Roc
'l ,a? RoUmell
C
i,, kwell „
LQCros S
4~ Wal _
03 _
02
04 Tibrit~e brbeauPk _ 0
~+r►~ -
i j•~
n
.Li ry '1
U
li~'ul
• 'i~~li
~ ~~~~r~ ~,nimm~itininitin~t7•n~Ur~n
I ~ O
~ v 4
field x A ~
10 Mansfiel ~ 11
Shannon
Ind; ~
rY ~a Ct I
I-90
Nora
09
x L
Sintn ~ ~
~ >
Sinto - es
>
5 W ~ O
-SU
Boone CG
Rnone. c B
Sca{e :1 indi -1250 ft (rouided) 05l11/01 Vidrrity Map
~
C'HAIIIGE ,F ~ CVI"ViTlvl" E."HIBIT
a
XALE t' • 100'
~•JE'J6'OE'
_
l•4A9.Et' A•21U6'31' O
Q
EMMMMO" Ao su ioo aao rao R.I17.00' `6259'31' L•117.Y5'
L•739.97' R.67].00' ~¢y
CENTENNI ~ TRAII ' R.673.00' 01-
G'
a20'19'02' vW-C
It 2
1-210,81' ry rl 0 K
R.673.00' W
ZI •20t'29'S2' i
A• 8'09' 10' PROPOSED R•61.50' o I~ \ ~ ~
L.I03.45' ay P HYDAOSMdN4 a ~ _
~ R.127.00' ~ o+~4f0 XpT. PA1fD 0
TRAILS
PROPOSEO BAAI( & ~
1yh5~ TRALS ZLR67305. 22A' ;j3213PApPpqp PAKO 0Z~'1RAt5, T1p r Hp011'J3'E 323.55 n
iRALS ~9 ya M~~ a i M~ 0 ■ ~
• 1 / bl
C M1►^I_ - z< o~
5~5i~18 PAOPOSED VAND N15~ PROPOSEO aSCOrERY PtACE W
1fGl NIDAOSECdMG F=
114. !2 ~ E <
_ PAOPOSEO BAEC GG14 IRAILS i W8
z°
iRAI ~ o < 3•
I
NTIIRE PAKU ~ •
~ TRAIL g
Q.17-11'51' EaSTING OiHT,
I 1-20270' muL, NiuAE ^
z YMCA
R•673.00' PAKD TRAII IW FApUTY
FA9PM ~ .
I d AtAYEI 1R1A5 ~
.
~ . x auVa nw ,wvLs ^
4 la SaoruxevAuEr
=
aaaaM eAM
~ FUAAIE PAYED ipAll5
~ .
~
~26=aa~~~~2a ~a • Q
t ~ ppppEpTY LINE Qx
q ~ EAU
~ mrnNamm nioraeomNc LoraauwcFU LaSUE ,WCA
~ S}C1KMlE ~
t ~-ro a n maxw 3.0waft sr ro? .uo sn,ao u. 110 Aain WASFQIJGMN
~ ran~o rar.ia N/A R/A
: r.urc ~a ww vsnw ryu rwn 15.675 v
er .itom catm nOIIX ..DW ro,r ~
Lun~ nus tx~u v, im tr
a
rn[ o u.mu+wc mo~oato wroio~ ~ y 111 1 1 1 LY11~1C
~*vo[o Mn r~
~ nut M[a ~.Gn sr lalo if.
a on sia w.c PAKn nw MM N0t to Scale
t ~I i:l
• . ' • S
ZE-37A-96
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
i, •
~
~
tt
~tM1'i
~ ii•
`~I It I
64i
U
Mirabew Pk
.
~
J
i
I~ Ii'
I
11~~11
1
R~~1
I
11~
IIf~
111~f~ tt
l1+i J` 1
R `
~ 14,~~~ •
11~
J
S
~ 11
~
10
MansfwW
ai=
C
Scale :1 inch - 833 ft (rounded) 06l14J01 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA. AA-** -A" Subject Property within UTA.
Subject Property within PSSA. Subject Property within ASA.
r ~ ' ~ •
ZE-37A-96
Existing Zoning
~'"i,'
I-218 56
~'~'r~•.
. 4244 2 02
~ 11 1
-~ll~ 11~11~~1~1
1-317 56
I-2 94 94C
~
i-a 1a s6
Mirabeau Pk
I-2 37 96C I. 7',~~,' ~
1-3 20 56
~
~
,f I-2 2442
RR-10 4 24
RR-10 4 24 42
I-S 16 56
1•242442
''Z 37 OBY
C
~
I-2 37 96C I-2 22
~
~
R-22 205 7 >
I-2 225 57
H
A
22 205 71 Mansfield
I-2 87 96C
R-10 24 1-2 a7 96C
-22 109 a c
1-2 a 7ec
4s
1-z so 7ec
-a 7t
e-a A 5C 12 c c
i-z a a 1- tZS a c 1-2 61 B-2 4 24 42
i-2 180 7ac
Scale : 1 indh - 667 h(roundec) 06/'14/01 Existing Z.rming
. , • . ,
ATTACHMENT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
• . . • • i
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
ii FoR ZE-37A-96
.z,....
SPOKX~ COUTSUY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1. The proposal shall compiy with the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), Light Industrial (1-2) and
all other applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the Director of the
Division of Planning/designee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the
original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public
notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use
action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on June 20, 2001, imposing a variety
of special development conditions. File No. ZE-37A-96 is available for inspection
and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning.
4. All previous conditions of approval for ZE-37-96 shall remain in effect.
ZE-37A-96 Public Hearing
Divlsion of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
~ - f, • !
•
~
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY AlVD PUBLIC C;QMMENTS
. . , .
. .
yTA rE
~ T
n
1809 t~cy.
S i ATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
R702 N. Drvision Street - Spokane, Washinqton 99218-1199 a (509) 456-4082 FAX (509) 456-4071
April 16, 2001
RECElVEu
"rammy Jones, Associate Plaruier SPOKANE +G(~~NT~
Spokane County Divisicn of Planning
1026 W. Broadway APR ' 2QQ~
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 DIVISIOh! OF CJc.ANlrt (NC.
Dear Ms. Jones:
Subject: Evaluation of revisions to original habitat management plan for Mirabeau Springs
project
After reviewing the latest revisions to the original Mirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and
Management Plan from September 15, 1997, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDrW) offers the following comn-ieiits. These revisions primarily focus on allowing limited
development within the ponderosa pine woocilands on the Mirabeau site.
• WDFW believes that paving within the fooipriiit of the existing trail within the ponderosa
pine woodland will have a limited impact on the wildlife within that significant plant
community type. No paving should occur within this habitat type off the existing soft
paths.
• Two new facilities (gazebo and Fort Mirabeau) will be constructed within the woodland.
This should liave limited impact as long as the majority of these structures are
constructed on sites where former Walk-in-the-Wild Zoo exhibits cunently exist. There
should be limited disturbancc to existing native vegetation surrounding these two sites.
All development, other than those just mentioned, should follow the guidelines set by the 1997
habitat management plan.
Thank you for the opportunity to comments on these revisions. If you have any questions please
contact me at (509)456-4079.
Sincerely
Jeff Azenad
Habitat Biologist
CC: Sue Lani W. Madsen, Madsen, Mitchell, Everson and Conrad
Kathleen M. Schultheis, David Evans and Assoc.
. . .
. ~
S P U K A N E ; r I t~~ C O U N T Y
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND GOLF
Doug Chase, Director cp;,.~,~~"F~~~''~ ,
: . ~ ; - _ ...,T~
,
. . . _ .s . u • - - i c-- . . s _ .i :,.a
Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning May 16, 2001
1026 West Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260-0050
Dear Tammy Jones:
Spokane County Parks, Rec. and Golf has reviewed the requested Change of Conditions
to a previously approved zone reclassification file Number ZE-37A-969 to allow
structures and paved trails within the interior of the ponderosa pine woodland. The
Parks Department encourages recreational use and development within this project and
considers these to be compatible with the existing public recreational invest made within
the area. Spokane County owns property adjacent to the north and south of the subject
property; which is intended for future park facilities. Additionally, the Centennial Trail,
owned by State Parks and maintained by Spokane County Parks, is located nearby. This
proposed project would provide an effective adjunct to the Centennial Trail. The
Mirabeau Point Center in intended to provide cultural, educational, entertainment and
recreational opportunities for area residents.
Thank you, for the opportunity to comment on this proposal, and feel free to contacx me
at (509) 477-2720, should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
PShase, Director, Spokane County parks, Rec. and Golf
teve Horobiowski, Parks Planner
404 North Havana • Spokane, WashinKton 99202-4663 • Telephone (509) 477-4730 Fax: (509) 477-2454
_ . , . •
To: Tammy Jones (Division of Planning)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Tuesday, June 05, 2001
Subject: ZE-0037-96 Stage: Hearing Examiner Phase:
Mirabeau Point Zone Reclass
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed.
Sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish
sewer fees.
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal.
SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit.
SS15A Arrangements for payment of appticable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development.
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
. , , . .
.
1 o , County ' blic Works,
Transportation • • Section,
Divisio • County • •
1 . ' • ADWA • O , A 99260. (509) . 1 1
Memo F~ F-IC;EIVEp
S ri I'1 E. C 0 i.1 N TV
To: Spokane County Planning
Planner: TAMMY JONES ~.,i~: ~~~~!%M 02
From: Greg Baldwin '
Subject: ZE-0037A-96
(RR-10 CHG OF COND PLANNING COND #10 HABITAT EVALUATION)
Applicant: SUE LANI MADSEN
Date: June 5, 2001
RE: Zone Review
Hearing 06/20/2001 Technical Review 04/12/2001
We request no changes to the conditions of approval submitted to your office on April
12, 2001.
CC: Applicant
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
.
.
PrajectStatus Active ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEL Y*
As Built Pians Received Rezone File ZE-0037A-76 -96
Road Plans Approved C'ompanion Files:
New Ruad Standards 5-I5-95 Mylar
Related Files: ZE-0037-96
Hearing: 06120/2001 1:15 Building Dept:
Technical Review: 04/12/2001 2: l_>
j Harvard Rd Plai;
Preliminary Review: rYPe~ Large Lot BIe1g. 5yuarL k cc:
Date Received: 03i30/2001
No. Lots: No. Acres:
Project Name RR-10 CAG OF COND PLANNING COND #10 HABITAT EVAULUATION
Site Address N. INDIANA, W. M[RABEAU, F. PINES,
AppticAnt 40 Range=l'o~~-nship-Section: 44 -?5 - 10 PAKCEL(S): (first 20 Sue Lani Madsen Conditions Mailed: (L"091ts 45105.9096
Flaod Zone No
Water Source
PO QOX 182
LDWALL, WA 99008- Sewer Sourcc
Phone (509) 236-2311 Schaol Dist
Fire Dist 1
Phone Dist
Building 477- 3675 /Planning 477-72001Engineer 477-36{)0 Contact I3/P 'fAMMY JONES Cuntact Eng
Date Submitted Descri tion Initials
Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need llarvard Rd Mitigation
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Trailic Analysis Eng Need Other
Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed
Copy to Accuuntine
Eng Agree Priority Fees Received 04,104/2001 L-ng Prelim Plat Fees Completed
NoEirx to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Completed - or Needs to be signed _
Design Deviation Dates (In-0ut)
on quanties or
drainage item calculated
Iiearing Date Decisiun App Den Cond Appld BCC
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Court
Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cond Appld
Stnmped Myiars to Secrecary (Sandy) _
/ / Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Sandy)
. `
I'6 ~:I~GII'~EE~.'S I~EVIEW 5HEE`'
r~jCC4 Sf3tU5 t1~Ct1Ve
As Built Plans Received Rezone File ZE"`0037A-96 -nfi
Raad Plans Apprnved Corripaniaai Fi3es:
- New Roati Standaeds S-t 5-95 Mylar Related Fi1es: 2E-0037-96
tiearing: f3uiTding Dcpt:
"I'eciznicab Ttc:view: 0411212001 2:1 5
1 C Harvarci Rd i'lan
Prcrlsmiriary Review: Type: I 1 Large Lot BZdg. Square Fcet
Date Received: 03i30/200 1
No. Lots: No. Acres:
P'roject lrTame RR-10 CHG ()F COND PLANNING CCIND #TO HArBiTAT EVAULUATION
Site Acidress N. ENDI.AN11, W. NlfI~(AEiE:A,U, E. I-I[NES,
Appl[cant Range -Torvns}tip-Sectian: 44 - 25 - 10 PARCEL(S): (first 20)
4ue Lana Madsen C"onciitioiis Mailed: 45105.9096
€°loud Zone Nu
Wr'ater Source
Enw:~LL, WA 99008- 110 nOk 192 Sewer Souree
I'hone 236-2311
5c3a4o1 Dist
Fitr I)'sst 1
Phone C1ist
E3uilding 477-3675 / Planning 47 7-7?t)0 /Enginec.r 477-36(}0 Goniact 'TAMMY ]ONES Cc3ratac[ E'n
Ilate Submitterl Descri tian - Itiitials
Cng NLed Technrcally Ccsmplete Eng Necd Har►+arcf Rcl Mitigation
Eng Nezd Llraina-c I'lans Ene Nced Trafiic Ai7alysis Eng Need ather
E-rtg Agrec Pay Fecs Rcceivcd Fng Final Plaz Fees Caznpteted
C:opy to Accvunting
Eng Agrec Priority Fees Receiveti I:rt; f'relim P1at F"ees Coniplekeci
I / Notiee to Public lNaEice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Campleted -or Needs to be signed - -
bessgn I]eviataon I)ates (in-C}ut)
1 f - l ~ 1+ f - rr rF ~ - l 1~
1 I I 1 ~ on quanties or
_ drainage item calculated
}-iearing Date Qecisiori App 17eai Cand .hppld QCC - -
Appealed to BCC Decisinn App den Ccsnd App1d Cou:-t
Appealed to Cauri L}eeision Ap,p _ Den Cond flpglcl
Starrtped Mylary to Secretary (Sandy)
/ Starnped 208 L.cst Plans to Sec€ezary (Sarady)
. ' w
• • . County Public Works,
Transportation • • •
1 • • County • •
1026 BROADWAY . O , .0- (509:W
Memo
To: Spokane County Planning
Planner: TAMMY JONES
From: Greg Baldwin
Subject: ZE-0037A-96
(RR-10 CHG OF COND PLANNING COND #10 HABITAT EVALUATION)
Applicant: SUE LANI MADSEN
Date: June 5, 2001
RE: Zone Review
Hearing 06/20/2001 Technical Review 04/12/2001
We request no changes to the conditions of approval submitted to your office on April
12, 2001.
CC: Applicant .
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAM-MY JONES
s . , .
.
h
~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
''YC`"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane County Building and Pla ing De art7it F
ROM: Division of Engineering & Roads ~
DATE: April 12, 2001
PROJECT: RR-10 CHG OF COND PLANNING COND #10 HABITAT EVALUATION
FILE ZE-0037A-96/ )
Technical/Review Date: (04/12/2001 @ 2:15)
Planner: TAMMY JONES
Hearing Date: @
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant: SUE LANI MADSEN
Section Township Range: 10-25-44
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
After review of the application for a Change of Condition, specifically Division of Planning Condition
No. 10, Spokane County Engineering has no new conditions of approval or comments to submit to
the record.
END
CC: Applicant SUE LANI MADSEN
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
, • .
M Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemrnings, Bill
Sent: Tues+day, Aprii 03, 2001 1:50 PM
Tv: Janes, Tammy
CC: Engelhard, 5eott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, E3renda; Baldwin, Greg, Hahman, Jvhn;
Litt[e, Colleen
Suhject: ZE-37A-96 - Mirabeau Point, Inc.
4-3-0 1
I received the above referenced proposal vn March 30, 200. I have nv comment an this proposai.
BilE Hemmings, PE
~
.
. . ,
,
a,
1i
k
~
S P O K A N E 1~ C O U N T Y
- -
DIVISION OF PLANNING A DIVISION C)F THE I'U131_IC 1NORKS DEPARTMLNT
MICHAC:I. V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOIZ GARI OBERC;, DIRF.CT'()R
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy
ICimball
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Spokane Regional Health Distcict; Steve Holderby
Fire District No. 1
Consolidated & Irvin Water Districts
WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife; Jeff Azzerad
FROM: Tammy Jones
DATE: May 23, 2001
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of June 20, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m.
FILE NO: ZE-37A-96
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditions to a previously approved zone
reclassification to amend Planning Condition # 1 in order to allow structures and
paved trails within the interior of the ponderosa pine woodland.
PARCEL NO: 45105.9096
APPLICANT: Mirabeau Point, Inc. c/o Sue Lani Madsen, P.O. Box 182, Edwall, WA 99008
509/236-2311
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by June 5, 2001
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W. f3KOA[)WAY • Sf'OKANE, WASHINGl'C)N 99260_0220
I'i u )ni (';i)L)1 t'; -72cin . FnX- (509)-177.,,a1 . TDI ) i ,(w;).j?7.; )z i
. .
. •
~
NOTICE aF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKAIwE CC)UNTY HEARING EXANIINER
T0: All interested persans, and ownersltaxpayers within 400 feet
YaU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARTNG WILL BE HELD UN THE
LAND U5E APPIIICATION LISTED BELUW, AS FULLaWS:
Appiicatian: ZE-37A-96; Change of Conditivns to a previously appraved zvne reclassification to
amend Flanning Conditivn # 1 in order to allow structures and payed trails within the interiar of the
ponderosa pine woodland.
Parcel No; 45105.9096
Hearing Date and Time: June 20, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m.
Place. Commissioners AssembIy Room, Lower Level, Spokane County public Works Building, 1 026
West Broadway, Spakane, Washington.
OwnerlApplicant: Mirabeau Point, Inc. clv Sue Lani 1Vladsen, PU Box 182, Edwall, VVA 99008
5491236-2311
Address and Locati4n. The subject property is generally lvcated west of and adjacent ta Mirabeau
Parkway south ofEuclid Rd, in the NE114 of Section 10, Township 25N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, WA.
Comprehensive Plan: Rural
Existing Zvning; Ftural Residential-10 (RR-1Q)
Environmental Defermina#icrn: A I7etermination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency an June I, 2001. The comment period ends June 15, 2001.
Related Fermits: In arder for the proj ect to be developed as propvsed, additional permits must be
obtained including building permits.
Diwision of Planning Staff: T"ammy Janes, Associate Planner, (549) 477-7225
HEA,RING EXAMINER PRCICEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be cvnducted under the rules of pracedure advpted in
Spakane County R+esolution No. 96-0294. All interes#ed persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and dvcuments before or at the hearing. The Hearqng Examiner may limit
the tirne given fio speakers. A speaker representxng each side of the issue is encauraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decisian will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to Caunty Resolutivn Nvs. 96-0171. Enviranmental appeals will follaw the same procedural
raute as the underlying action. All hearings wwi11 be canducted in facilities that are aceessible to persons
with physical disabilities.
Iaspection of File, Copies of Dncuments: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days befvre the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
Cvunty Diyision of Planning, V Flaor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. $roadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except halidays. Copies
of dvcuments wi11 be made available far the cvst of reproduetion. If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7225. Send written comments tfl the Spokane County
I)ivisivn of Planrung, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Tammy Jflnes. Motions must be
made in writing and submitt+ed to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3rd Floar, Public Works
Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99264-0245.
~ . • , .
~
~
S P O K A N E `~1 4•
O U N T Y
,
DIVISION OF f'LAfVNING A DlVltil(1N OF THL PUBLiC WOIZKs DEI'AKTMf:1!"]
MUCHAE:L V. NEEUHAM, U112I c_ I(_)IZ GAfl1' l)I3(-K(;, Ull:l
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife; Mark Azzerad
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner DATE: March 30, 2001
RE: Change of Conditions to an existing Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone; ZE-37A-96
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
April 12, 2001 @ 2:15 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING CONFERENCE RM. 1A
Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM
for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The
sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend
the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to
me prior to the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor
at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your
cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7200.
Note: The Division of Planning will now be circulating for comments on
the SEPA checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only
time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA checklist for this
project.
C: Mirabeau Point, Inc./Sue Lani Madsen; P.O. Box 182, Edwall, WA 99008
Attachments: Technical Review Form, SEPA Checklist, Application, Site Plan
1026 W. L31Z(~ADWAI' • SI'C1KAti(:, W:ISHINC;'1'ON 99260-0220
I'{!O ~tif': (509) 477-7200 • FA?C: (5(l9) 477-2243 • TI7D: (509) 477-7133
, . . ~
}
Spokane County
Division of Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: April 12, 2001 @ 2:15 p.m.
Project File No.: ZE-37A-96
Project Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Mirabeau Parkway
and south of Euclid Road, in the NE '/4 of Section 10, Township 25 N., Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Rural
Project Description: Change of conditions to an existing Rural Residential-10
(RR-10) zone to modify Planning Condition #10, in order to amend the
recommendations contained within the Mirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and
Management Plan, to allow structures and paved trails within the interior of the
ponderosa pine woodland.
Parcel No(s): 45105.9096
Applicant(s): Mirabeau Point, Inc. / Sue Lani Madsen
P.O. Box 182
Edwall, WA 99008
(509) 236-2311
Project Planner: Tammy Jones
. . .
~
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: ZE-37A-96
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions to a previously approved zone reclassification
to amend Planning Condition #1 in order to allow structures and paved trails within the interior of the
ponderosa pine woodland.
PA.RCEL NO: 45105.9096
HEARING DATE AND TIME: June 20, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m.
APPLICANT: Mirabeau Point, Inc, c/o Sue Lani Madsen, P.O. Box 182, Edwall, WA 99008
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located west of and adjacent to Mirabeau Parkway south of
Euclid Rd, in the NE '/4 of S 109 T 25N5 R 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for tllis proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later
than 5:00 p.m., June 18, 2001, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent
to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 509) 477-7225
DATE ISSUED: 6/ 1/01 SIGNATURE:
CJONIIVIIIN'TS REGARDING IINVIRONMENI'AL CONCERNS ARE WII)00 AT THE HF-ARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
8. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
9. Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
10. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
11. WA State Dept. of Fish & Wild(ife; Jeff Azzerad
~
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REZONE, PAGE 2 OF 2
Give detailed explanation of reyuest for change in status of the proposal.
.
(J ~ a~ v~ v~~ •~-~.t v k OL 1-~ ►J ~ ~ ~ ~~r
A►2L` ~A ~ Lk 6e- PLL Ve- C.{ 4z) L-~ 1.l C~ ~tir
L C' 1
-,E:_t
If development of the site will be changed substantially by this request, or thc
property has boundaries different than originally proposed, a revised development
plan must be submitted.
' Signature of Applicant or Agent Address if different than Applicant
Change of Conditions, Rezone, 0 12301 urtc
T
~ t. •.I ~ G
S P :1 . ,r = . ~ ~
~ _ .
~ ~ i ~ l~~.`•.. . a_.._..4`:tt`~
_ E
4"~ .O'• /~:1~
~ --ft~ p ~
I E N V I[ I R-N NI I E N I F A I L
CHIECIKILAST
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
~ SECTION 11.1 0.230f 11
w' s
w
~ P fi:r^r-'teVED "
-
SPOKAN E CC)U NTY
DIVISIC)N UF PLANNING
UL Chan e of Conditions ` -y. . _
l~f ~i Iff ~
to a . =
Previously Approved Zane Change
,
Parcel No. -
Date: 3 - Co 6 l ApplACation No.: ~ -
Name (]f ApplicantlRepresentative. _re1 ~'~t_~~.~.a 1~ct~1►...,~ ►-..c~ ~~-~.c:~~.~ AItAa
Mailing Address: P6
City: State: W Zip:
Phane: {Work} 2- ~6 (e7 ~ l (Haine) SCO:5~j - Z- S(,-;, 2-`4!S_
Existing Zone Classificatpon:
Date Existing Zone Classification Established; ~
Legal Description of Property: '~s~ f~'}-~,-~-..~ ~ ~ r~-•~ cL ~ ; . ~
Sectian; Township -z , l Range 'Ll _
Source of Legal: cv• - k, c-j
PR,OPC7SEIl CHAN+GE OF CONI)ITI4NS
Reference specifc "Conditivn(s)" aforiginal approval. (Cite the applicable conditiali
from the Findings and C)rder of the Hearing Examiner CommiXtee's publTc hearing). _
E ~ l ~ - ~.'l►~ G' !f v~'~ G ~ G'
- - r.
-7 E -7 ci (42 1 o
~~rn~~___..~.~ ~,s'~~-. ~ ~,~L-~ ~ 4~ ~ ~
v tx V\ w k
1~'~ -~YU- 1'~ t~- ir c. _ l t~--,r.~ t'~~ f•~ 4S,
.
~
. „
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
Date:
Department:
Department Contact Person:
Action: Change of Conditions to an existing Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone to
modify Planning Condition #10, in order to amend the recommendations contained
within the Mirabeau Point Habitat Evaluation and Management Plan, to allow structures
and paved trails within the interior to the ponderosa pine woodland.
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING: APRIL 12, 2001 @ 2:15 P.M. .
ote:
The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to
assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing
Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the
proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing
Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public
Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is
to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and
other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design
recommendations.
The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan
by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all
agencies/departments have been contacted--only those who have been determined to have
primary interest.
1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed
on the Public Hearing Agenda YES NO
b. If no, what is lacking?
c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled
upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the
first available public hearing.
2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be
required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary)
. . •
.
. ,
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1)
PURI'OSE OF CHECICLIST
The State Envi: onmenLal Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental a~encies
to consider the environmencal impacu of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental
irnpact statement (EIS) must be prepared for aIl proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you
and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,
if it ca~n be done) a.nd to help the agency decide whecher an EIS is required.
IrVSTR UCTIONS FOR APPLICAIVTS
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use Lhis checklist to decermine whether the envlronmental iulpacts or your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able Lo answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire e:cperts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the quesrions
now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental reb lations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist quest:or.s apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them ove: a period
of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that n,ill help describe your
proposzl or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you Lo
eYplain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determirung if there may
be significant auve: se impact.
USE OF CHECI~LIST FOR ~VOrV-PROIECT PROPOSALS-
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be ans :;e: ed "does not
apply." T~; ADDITION, complete the SUPPLENIE~TAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIpNS (par D).
For non-proje" ac:ior.s, the references in the checklist to the words "project,"" aDplicant," a.~
~.d
property or sirle" snould be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic are:.."
respectivelv. Spokzne Envira-:-:entu? Ordinar.ce Chec4clist
0.L. 2
,-_1
. .
~
A. B ACKGROUND FILE/PROJECT NO.
1- Name of proposed project, if applicable:
%Y- ~ Y l.~ ~ ~
2. Name of applicant:
~
Vt1~ -~j 6 6--
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
~rL L--Q~ f Kr.L&s-e~ py U, zf. C~
q
4. DaLe checklist prepared:
3 Z U
5• Aaency requestinc, checklist:
v
~ ►~-e~ ~ 1
6. Proposed timinc, or schedule (including phasin~, if applicable):
U U '
Spokzn;, Environme:zc.zl
:sz
c•
. . •
.
~
A. B ACKGROUND (contir.ued):
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, espansion, or further activiry related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
C~ t~ ~ YJY C~~ c' c5~ ~ W► l~ 1'~ ~1r~ ~ ~ ~~Y c.~r c. h cp
_
c~ Y- L - w- IAAIL
i~ L /1!t P~ /~_G~~ ~r,r,r, l,~ r~►.-'1P v~--C~-T cJ ► hc I(" lGt.
~
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, e::plain.
r~l ( ~
8. List any environmenTal information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
D'Y 4~-- dA CA
9. Do you kno~~ n:hether applicacions are pending for goverrmental approvals of other proposals directl~
affectinc, the propeny covered by your proposal% If yes, explain.
c)
10. List any- government approLals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if l;non-r.
CAL c
~v
AY e CA. a ~ ►,,^e,,`.
C', a- r
Spokane Enviro:,mental Ordinznce Checklist Pa;e 4 o'121
. . • .
r
A. BACKGROLND (continue#
11. Give a brief, comiolete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
.
site. There are several questions later in this checklist That ask you to desc: ibe cenain aspects of your prooos.:J.
You do not need to repeat those answers on this pa;e_
~
e, r j v I 1 ~
~
v-
~ ~E ~ CAL- L 1 ~ ~ dt
,
(J A
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a pe: son to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a streec address, if any, and section, township and range, if l;nown. If a proposal
would occur over a ranae of area, provide the ranue or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a le'al description,
site plan, vicinity map, and zopographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required zo duplicate maps or decailed plans submined with anti- perrut
application related to this checklist.
^ 1
Y ~c`
~
r ,fe_
13. Does che proposed action lie within the Aq ifer Sensiiive Area (ASA)? The General Sewe- Service Area% The
Priority SeR-e; Sen-ice Area% The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Countti-'s ASr~ Over1~~~- zone Atlas for
boundaries).
c,_.:,'.-,- t=... . . . , , ~ , _
♦ • • •
~
A
Evaluation.For
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. EvVIRONti1ENTAL ELE-NIENTS:
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other: (Z.oc~G
-5
rL ~ ~Y -k-,~ L 71
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (appro:cimate percent slope)?
Y~
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? IE you know the classification of agriculLUra1 soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
- 1~~ ,r~-~ ► ~'uY v~_
d. Are there surface indications or hisLOry of unstable soils in the immediate vici.nity?
If so, describe.
~1.-~ • Y~- ~ ~ S
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate qua-ntities of any {illing or srsding
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
YLe- r ~ ~ g L~- b ~v~~ ~ ~ v S ,
~ ~ C~,.vtC'c C` vt \-r•z- i . a , r. 1 .i 7 ~ ~ L~- ~?S L•~ . ~ ~ ,
'~k- .~~\A~- Ck'S C ~~c,U~ ~c..~-- ~.v.~ , - ~ -
~i-c•.. ~c~ ~ ~,n , v.,
' ` ~c•. v~ , _
-5 ;v..c~. ~-cc;•\ ~ ~vc, l Z• c'~_<_ r c~. 4-r~ ~
C) 7r '\1A.~
~ > •~~C y ~QC~CG 5` ] ~ ri~~ ~ C , C~`t C~C~~ ~ ~'7 `~v~~ _ v~c~ ( • ~L ~ ~ ~ C. k ~.'~c , , -
f. Could e; osion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use. If so, ~ene: ally describe.
1'-elvy-16 V o~, \ 0~ U e~i Q- T~~ G~. v~-C.~
J
u Y w-G~ i 1r-, *ft C at~~ P P~rO 6~ v►-~ ' C~r n~
_ L l'i~.- ~ r d ~ t, ►reG ~ ~-...r~~- ~ ~ S
~ -
~.i`C' 6 - I
. . • ,
.
~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Onlv
B. EVVIRONYIENTAL ELFaI-IEiVTS (Continucd):
g. About w•hat percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for esample, asphalt or buildings)?
ou C -'z~`' 7~C '~L
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, o: other impacts to the earth, if any:
L Y'OS~ l/1-~ LG~Yb1 01-c-L51 .JU\1` '6t
S~'t c1 ~ CGr~ r'l.c_ C~l 1'1~ Y~
- ~ v
? • AIR
a. ~,~Ihat type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
auzomobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quanrities, if kno~vn.
v -r S
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
Y~.e T s
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to ai;, if any:
c: i~n~ ecklis: P7
~
: , .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. UntVTRONN1ENTAL EI.EMEN?S (Continued):
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any su; face water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the sice (including
year-round and seasonal strearris, saltwater, lakes, ponds, n etlands)% If y es, describe
Lype and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
~ ~ Irr,-T s
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described wate: s? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
~ p
3) Estimate the anount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill maLenal.
Nu o
4) Will the propos:J require surtace waLer wiLhdrawals or diversions? Give a sene: al
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
I~U
S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-yelr f]oodplain? If so, note location on t~e site
plan.
O
St ok.i::'.. ` o: ? i
. , ' . ,
.r `
Evaluation For
'ragency Use Only
B. EvVIRONMENTr1L ELEMENTS (Continued):
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste maLerials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of wasce and ancicipated volume of discharge.
~ U
b. Ground:
1) Will ground-water be w ithdrawn, or will water be dischar~ed to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
I \1.. U
2) Describe waste material that zvill be discharged inco the ground from sepcic tanks or
other sanitary R; aste treatment facilicy. Descnbe the general size of the system,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of persons the rystem(s) are eYpected to serve.
~
3) Describe any sy-stems, other than those designed for Lhe disposal of sanitary waste,
installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including
s;•sLems such as those for the disposal of storm R%ater or drainage from floor d.rains).
Describe the Lype of system, Lhe amount of material to be disposed of through the
system and the types of materials likely Lo be d.isposed of (includin~ msterials which
may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fightino,
activities).
Spokane Fr.•-iro^::~~:iL~' c=l:-:..a.ic. CfleAl15t Pa"~ q
J~ o.
I • ~
• • ~
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only
B. EWIRONMEiTAL ELEiblEVl"S (Continued):
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above-
ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of matenals will
be stored?
5) Whac protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals
stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes
measures to keep chemicals out of disposal rystems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
I4 /A
c. Water Runoft (includinc, storm water)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including sLOrm water) and mechod of colleczion and
disposal, if any (include quanLities, if known). Where will this water floa ? Will this
water flow inLO other w aters? If so, describe.
~ S,~ P '~-C•~wZ ~ t •<~E\~:~Fc'c~ I ~L~
y.G~ ~ E' ~ ~ ~1 VL~ 1 ~'~~'S~G~i..r.i~ ~i'~ • \Y~~~ c'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _
.
- - - ,
2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the sice in a locatio❑ whe: e a saill or
leak will drain to su:face or groundwater or to a siorm water disposal syszem
discharging Lo surface or groundwacer?
0
3) Could wzsLe materials enter ground or surface wacers= If so, gene: a?1~Y desc: ibe.
.
I'u-c° 10 0.`
, _ .
• ~ ~
p ~ •
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only
B. EiVVIRONti1EiVTAL ELEv1ENTS (Continued):
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any (if the proposed action lies within Ihe Aauife: Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilities concerninj Sections 3b(4), 36(5), and 3c(2) of this
checklist).
~''~•c -~,.L ~ c._1_ ~ ~ \ ra ~'.]c~.. c~rc -i . ~t= \ c
~
~
~'Y: ~ • (-Q. c ' ~e , c • l c` C' ~ c'
C 'j ~ ~ \ ~ ~~..__c . ~ ~ ~ c'. ~ t - ' ~ ~ ` c _ \ ~ ~ ~ • ~
~~.v~ • v~•~ .-~s'-- ~ C-~
4. PLANTS 11n/ 1l_ -Tcc 1K-Q, ~e,y- 'W ~ ~ J "1 OY' C. ~ e "C G~ S .
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
_v,,,- deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
t/ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
_i,-- shrubs
_t,z- grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water plants: water lily, eelarass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. \What kind and amount of veaetation will be removed or altered?
\ ; F c ~~1t,~~~~ 1 ~L1c" ~
c. List threacened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or othe:
measures to prese:-ve or enhance vegetation on the site, if anv:
e e w-o~ C- ~
r~ lre-,--jP-nr v-e- L, 1r-4~- vt 4-2 ~c.r ~lr-a~ 1
6- 'C-~
w
S ~ 1-~ ►~1-- ; 1~ ~ -
S,)o!-;an~ :-1 ce 1ist P.~^,
_ _i
I ,r• • •
. .
. M
Evaluation For
Asencv Use Onlv
B. EVVIRONIMENI"I'AL ELF-MENIS (Continucd):
5. ANIMALS [62- ~ ~ C ~ c
J ,
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the sice or are known to be on or near the sice:
birds: haNk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Y-e
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ~3'
fish: bass, salmon, trout, hernng, shellfish, other: A
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration roure? If so, explain.
kv k7 -1
d. Proposed mea.sures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
124 "-v'- k6 C--- -TS
6. ENERGY AND NATU-RAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energ (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed projecc's enerby needs? Describe whether ic will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
Cl_ L c~.6
6. V'ould y-our project a:iect the potcnti-il use oE solar energv bv adjacent n: ope;ties?
If so, generall~- describe.
I o
S;,oa::L, I...:i: o.;:.:e:: 0: j i::_~ce Checkli5; 0: ~ 1
- -
~ ~ ' Y
~ •
A Evaluation }=or
AQencv Use Onlv
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELE:'Y1ENTS (Continucd):
c. Whac kinds of energy conservation features are included in che plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacrs, if any:
l-2
7• ENVIRONti1ENITAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to tosic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a restilt of this
proposal? If so, describe. ~1
1 ~l C~
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or conTrol environmental
health hazards, if any:
Or-e 4~(
b. Noise
1) What types of noise e.r•ist in the area ~vhich mzy affect your project (for eYample:
traffic, equipment, operation, othe;)?
2) V'hat tti-pes a:.d 1e~ els of noise would be created bv or associated v,;-ith the p; oject
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicace vvhat hours noise would come from the site.
M- ►VIC) r 4') v~-- ► w ~ L,4_
vv v~c1Y vv~ot.l w ar-~ ~1~~ 1^ 6M. Y s,
Spo;.ir:e Ci;ec':Iist Paoe 10= -)l
~ - -
« , .
, r
£waluati4r► Fqr
Acency Use Only
S. EL"IMRC7iy'1+vIENTAL ELFa'YlEitiTTS (Continucd):
3} Propased nneasure to reduce or conLral noise impacu, if any:
Yz ~ c~~ ► ~ ~
S. La,NI] Ai,1D SH(JRELINE USE
a. What is the current use Qf the site and ad}acent prope rtues%
_ N~
b. Has the site been used frr a;rieulture? If so, describe.
C)
c. L escribe any szructures an the site.
1 A U-,Yv -e-
d. Will any structu: es be demQ3ished? If so, which?
_ 9c)
e. ~~`v"hat is the current zonin; classifieation of the site3
S `F"1n~->._rl~ E,_ i,<J.. J- at'' I-!
S~~
' .
Evaluation For
AQency Use 4nlv
B. ENVIRONI-IENTAL ELEI~IEN7'S (Cantinued):
f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site?
I~ l~-Y G••~
g. If applicable, what is the currenc shoreline maste: program designation of the site?
t c
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" a. ei)
If so, specify.
J. Appro-6mately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace%
- I V~
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
(7
-
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existinc, and projected
land uses and plans, it any:
l.o~v S •
Spo'.:r.c 1:...i.._:...._:::.. -::i::a:c: Chec?-:list
I 1 ~ o: % I
i
, • ~ R
Evaluation For
AE~encv Use Onlv
B. EWIRONMEti''I'AL ELE:I'IENTS (Continued):
9. HOUSING
a. Appro:cimately how many uniu would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, w•ould be elirunated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
1~ G~ Y.~ `c Gc Y~ Le
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the callest hei~ht of any proposed structure(s), not including antennss;
what is Lhe principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
1~-0~ ~ ~
b. What views in the i:nmediate vicinity w•ould be altered or obstructed~
1A
. Proposed measu;es to reduce or control aestheiic impacts, if any:
=1r.ce C'r,ec':1;,: Pa,
,
_
, • .
, Evaluation For
AQency Use Only
B. EWIRONMEN-I'AL ELEiti1ENTS (Continucd):
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What rype oF light or glare will Lhe proposal procuce% What time of day n%ould it
mainly occur? ,
T
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safetv hazard or interiere with
views?
C--
I ~ C ~J ~
~
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your propos-,l%
~ lY`-~
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
- N-- A Gl.~ ✓J Yl ~ l C~~--2
12. RECREATION
a. Wh3t designated and inform-J recreational opporzunities are in the imried.iate vicinity?
b. ould the proposed p:oject displace any eYistin- recrea~tionsl uses? If so, desc~:~~_
151
I .
. y >
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Oniv
B. EtWZRONiV1EiVTAL EI.FsMENTS (Concinucc!):
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
13- HISTORIC AND CULTUR-~L PRESEftVr1TIOiN
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, stace, or local
preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
Ik- t C" l-c-
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific
or cultural imporLance known Lo be on or next to the site.
f~ -Vz-) C- T- -c--\ - - -
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
14. TRANSPORT ATION,
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access
Lo the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
~Z~
Is site currently- se: ved by public transit? If not, what is Lhe appro~cimstz disiance
to the nearest transit stop?
c/r so ~ . ,
`pokane E ::vi: .,ze:.:,? O:
- • ~
.
~ -
Evaluation For
A2encv Use Onlv
B. EiNVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continucd):
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have~ How many would the
project eliminate?
~ "r-A -r c.`A- ~ CN--
C? - t lvy~~t , V-.---~- Ve D e _ v-1- , C..
d. V''ill the proposal require any ne~L- roads or streets, or improvemerits to e~istin. roads
or streets, not includinc, driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public
or private).
U •
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity 01) water, rail, or ai:
Lransportation? If so, generally describe.
h O •
f. How many vehicular tnps per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate n;hen peak volumes would occur.
\1 .
. ~
C~-ri l-~-v. I
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportaTion impacu, if any:
15. PUBLIC SER1,1CES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for exarnole:
fire protection, police proLection, health care, schools, oche:)? If so, gene: a.lly describe.
I~O
. r~••ir,-.... ~~-;a;...,. r~c,..-i,l_ , I'.;'. 1~~ -?1,
. •
r , .
.
Evaluation Fur
Asrncv Use Onlv
B. ENVIRQNi1~1ENTAL ELE.~VIEi~J'1"S (Continucd):
b. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol direct impacts on public services, if any.
LL k~ ►0 ~ 1 Cc, VJ
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site electrici , natural gas, -ace~ e use ~
~
service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, ot er.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity
which might be needed: `
IVC C~v't K , - ~tiI'~ 1
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalry of perjury thac Lhe above responses are made truthfully and to the bes of
my knowledge. I also unde: stand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or wi11{ul lack of full disclosure
on my part, the a<-),encv mav withdraw any determination of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon tnis
checklist.
Date: 5/_~1Lj I
Proponent: Proponent:
(Signature~
Address: PjZ. City, State, Zip: LAJ-
Phone: Z--S (e~
I'erson completing, the form: ~~-~kctL~~r~ Date: (v Cj ~
Phone: 5-4)Z -~>i I
• y
1 J~ ~
i ~
FOR STAFF USE C+NLY
Staff Member(s) Reviewin~ Chec~.list: -
$ased on thzs staff review af ilxe enyironrnenial checklist and other pertinent information, the staft:
A. Concludes thau there are no probable si~nificarzt adverse impacts and recomr~lends a
deCerminatiCan of nonsiani{1canCe (DNS).
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impaczs do exist for the current
praposal and recommends a mirigated determinatiQn of nonsignifzcance with condirions (NIDNS).
C. Concludes that there are prvbable si;nificant adve: se environmental impacts and recornmends
a determination of significance (DS).
F,FFEA. TO FEE SCHEDULE F+pR FILSiNG FEE
~~r~'.:~:-e sr-~n.;..~r;:~l (]r'ir.:~r.._~ ~~.'t,~c'.list I'3ce
, c._ i
~ 4'
, d►- I7 , .
. .
SPoKANE CC)UNT'Y DIViSION +C)F $iJII~ING AND (..;(]DE ENFORCENENT
1026 WEST BrtoADWAY AVENUE • SFOKANE, WA 99260-0050
(509) 477-3675
STTE INF'flRMATION PROJECT INFQRMA'TION
Site Address: 13504 E MIRABEAUr PKY Prctjert Number: aI C1D2174 Inv. 1 Issue Date:
Spakane, WA 99206 ermit Use: ZE-37A-96
Parcel Numher, 451(}5.9046
Subdivision: RANGE Applicaat: MIRABEAU POTNT TRUSTEE
Black: Lot: 2920 S GRANI]
Zoaing: RR-1 RuraJ Residential 10 SPOKANE, WA 99243 Phone: (509) 324-3269
+f3wner; MTRABEAU Ft)INT TRUSTEE Cagtact: Madsen Mitchell EvansanE4cCoruad
Address: 2920 S GRAND Phoae: (549) 236-0182
SP(3KANE, WA 99203
Setbacks - Front: Left: Right: Rear:
Inspectar: SR IINSPECTOR
Water I)ist: UNKNOW1,11
Group Name: ZE-37A-96
Froject Name:
PERMIT(S)
Z0ne Chang Contrac#or: License
ENGI"NEERS MISC REVIEVd $50.00 ENVIRONM-ENTAI, RCVIEW $75.00
CHANGF OF C{]NDITIONS 88240 $882.40 PRE-APP C(]NF CHG (7F CClN1J $38.00
Total Perniit Fec: $I,045.40
PAYMENT SUMMARY Pa e 1 nf 1 1VoTE5
FAYMENT Processed By: WRIGHT, RAE
Printeci By; WENDEL, CLORIA
Tran Date Receipt # Pavment Amt
4f4I01 2067 $1,045_40
Total Fees AmountPaid AtnountOwing
$ 1,045.40 $1,045.4(} $().00
1~. . •
~ .
i . v
f 1
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Divison of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number: 2067 Custon:er Number
Projects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owing PAID Pmt
01002174 1 $1,045.40 $1,045.40 $1,045.40 $1,045.40
Total: $1,045.40 $1,045.40 $1,045.40 $1,045.40
Misceltaneous Items
Total PAID: $1,045.40
Tender
Tvpe C/reck Acct Balance CC Nbr Exp Date TENDERED
Check1 2443 1,045.40
Total TENDERED: 1,045.40
Over / (Short) $0.00
Clrange $0.00
Notes:
Tran Date / Time: 414/01 2:42: 39 PM
By: GWendel
Logon User: gwendel
Station: GWENDEL
Override By:
Printed: 414101 2: 42: 40 PM Page I oj 1
Parcel: 45105.9096
Owner: INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST
CoOwner:
~ A ,~„r •t.. ev ~ i
Owner Address
315 W MISSION STE 5A SPOKANE WA 99201 1- 94 84C 1-3 1856
-
Site Address Mir eau
,
0 UNKNOWN SPOKANE
Legal Description
X,..:r;
PTN E11210-25-44 BEG E114 COR SD SEC TH
N69DEG56MIN11SECW 1013.95TO WLY ROW MIRABEAU ;54 79
PKWY & POB TH TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS ~%y~A/. -3 2056
N69DEG10MIN22SECW 673' TH TO CUR TO L THRU CEN ANG
OF21DEG06MIN30SEC
247.94' TH S41DEG56MIN08SEC2W 3.18' TH
N89DEG56MIN11 SECW 519.45' TO ELY ROW LN OF DISCOVERY gsC
PL TH NOODEG1 1 MIN33SECE 323.56 TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS •~~~tst:~C.
RR-10 4 24 4
S89DEG48MIN27SECE 673,TH ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG
OF
YS ~ ti ?r~'u x
27DEG52MIN08SEC 327.35' TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS 16 $4C S61DEG56MIN19SECE 37.5' ALG CUR THRU CEN ANG UF
24DEG28MIN17SEC 16.02' TH N520EG31MIN58SECE 75.56' TO 78C
i ,ir,'~•: , <<
CUR TO L RAD BEARS N37DEG28MIN02SECW 62.5' ALG CUR
~
TO L CEN ANG OF 201 DEG29MI N42SEC 219,8' TO ELY LN OF
.~1.. S..
YMCA PROP TH N25DEG22MIN25SECW 249.28' TH -2 1 4C
N890EG56MIN11 SECW 740' TO E LN OF W 200' OF NE114 TH 9 f;,,.,;~'?';j~•
NOODEG06MIN27SECE 1560.16' TO S LN OF N 300' TH
S89DEG27MIN33SECE 693.58' TH ALG CUR TO R RAD BEARS R- 2 ~ 4 C S56DEG54MIN22SECW 673' THRU CEN ANG OF
17DEG12MIN18SEC 202.09' TH S15DEG53MIN21SECE 463.38' 277 1-2 37 96C ~I
TO CUR TO L RAD BEARS N74DEG06MIN39SECE 727' ALG SD 5 J %
CUR "40 `
THRU CEN ANG OF 8DEG09MIN11SEC 103.45' TH
S24DEG02MIN32SECE 255.31' TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS
S65DEG57MIN28SECW 673' ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG OF
20DEG29MIN03SEC 240.61' TO CUR TO L RAD BEARS
N86DEG26MIN31 SECE 727' ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG OF
38DEG36MIN08SEC 489,81' TH S42DEG09MIN36SECE 26.61' TO
CUR TO R RAD BEARS S47DEG50MIN24SECW 673' ALG SD
CUR THRU CEN ANG OF 62DEG59MIN14SEC 739.85' TO
POB
r •
Parcel: 45105.9096
Owner: INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST
CoOwner.
Owner Address ~p
315 W MISSION STE 5A SPOKANE WA 99201
Mir eau
Site Address
0 UNKNOWN SPOKANE
X.%,;;h~r:
; . i
Legal Description
~ 'k~
PTN E1/210-25-44 BEG E114 COR SD SEC TH N89DEG56MIN11SECW 1013.95' TO WLY ROW MIRABEAU A•~~ `•K%~~ ,
. v.
PKWY & POB TH TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS r ;~A~~
N69DEG10MIN22SECW 673' TH TO CUR TO L THRU CEN ANG t~ `.~4~'' j, ~,;1;'ifA' ,.k.~ ti r.
OF 21 DEG06MIN30SEC `
i. ~,,9< ~
247.94' TH S41 DEG56MIN08SEC2W 3.18' TH
ti.,.
N89DEG56MIN11SECW 519.45' TO ELY ROW LN OF DISCOVERY ~~~k'•: :PL TH NOODEGIIMIN33SECE 323.56' TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS
~S89DEG48MIN27SECE 673' TH ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG
OF
: .v;~
27DEG52MIN08SEC 327.35' TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS ~
;~;.,t;~~'.
S610EG56MIN19SECE 37.5,ALG CUR THRU CEN ANG OF
24DEG28MIN17SEC 16.02'TH N52DEG31MIN58SECE 75.56'TO CUR TO L RAO BEARS N37DEG28MIN02SECW 62.5' ALG CUR ;TO L CEN ANG OF 201DEG29MIN42SEC 219.8' TO ELY LN OF
YMCA PROP TH N25DEG22MIN25SECW 249.28' TH
N89DEG56MIN1 1 SECW 7401TO E LN OF W 2001OF NE1/4 TH
NOODEG06MIN27SECE 1560.16' TO S LN OF N 300' TH
S890EG27MIN33SECE 693.58' TH ALG CUR TO R RAD BEARS ~
S56DEG54MIN22SECW 673' THRU CEN ANG OF
17DEG12MIN18SEC 202.09' TH S15DEG53MIN21SECE 463.38' p a sfie
TO CUR TO L RAD BEARS N74DEG06MIN39SECE 727' ALG SD
CUR
THRU CEN ANG OF 8DEG09MIN1 1 SEC 103.45' TH ~
S24DEG02MIN32SECE 255,31' TO CUR TO R RAD BEARS
S650EG57MIN28SECW 673' ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG OF
20DEG29MIN03SEC 240.61' TO CUR TO L RAD BEARS
N86DEG26MIN31SECE 727' ALG SD CUR THRU CEN ANG OF
38DEG36MIN08SEC 489.81' TH S42DEG09MIN36SECE 26.61' TO
CUR TO R RAD BEARS S47DEG50MIN24SECW 673' ALG SD
CUR THRU CEN ANG OF 62DEG59MIN14SEC 739,85' TO
POB
Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended
for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency.
.