Loading...
2004, 06-08 Permit App: BLD-04-04529 Pole BldgS°po"kane ��alley BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WORKSHEET City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department Building Division 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 688-0036; Fax; (509) 688-0037 REQUIRED SITE INFORMATION Street Address: 2 vjCC KD . Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): Legal Description: t k 21Oxl 90\--1- S\!ticAlt,,,� PERMIT DESCRIPTION: Building Permit Relocation ❑ Change in Use ❑ Grading ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Tenant Improvement ❑ Fire Safety ❑ Other OWNER/APPLICANT INFORMATION ❑ Owner: fCkc- ' c Phone:°' 'O 5ky1k Fax: Address: s3 . C.cr,. x- `°%\h. " R C)— City ate Zip Code ❑ Contractor: 1c± Phone:c-'i).L4e,ct-i Fax: G.:_4 Address: . Re. .,V.3ct \va*h. \rn 3f City State Zip Code Applicant: %\ Phone: 4-10-15L1 Fax:=r-4.,,11Ln Address: tZEST S t \Ctc"i %.v) City St to Zip Code ❑ Architect: SQ- (5,.i,n-n�•j- Phone: ,`5,y-,zrtt Fax: Address: City State Zip Code WA State Contractor License #:'L r 1� i Contact: .1 Stir -v-1 6vi.(i Zip s 1 IGSPj 4 e►`b'-t,vS PERMIT/BUILDING INFORMATION HEIGHT TO PEAK:- -211 -1 I DIMENSION5:._ 110X abd )c # OF STORIES: MAIN FLOOR TO SQ. FTG: S)cO • 2"" FLOOR SQ. FTG: UNPIN BASEMENT SQ. FTG: FINISHED BASEMENT SQ. FTG: GARAGE SQ. FTG: DECK/COV. PATIO SQ. FTG: OCCUPANCY GROUP: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: tole ��-r' ..r.--, HEAT SOURCE: # OF BEDROOMS: TOTAL HABITABLE SPACE: .3.. 00 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: COST OF PROJECT: (ni 00 0 30% SLOPES ON PROPERTY: rJ1A SEWER OR ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM? MANUFACTURED HOME Width: Manufacturer: Length: Year: Pit Set: RELOCATION Previous Address: Proposed Use: FIRE SAFETY Fire Sprinkler: Tent: # of Heads: Fire Alarm: Paint Booth: Fireworks Display: Blasting: Date/Time: Valuation: Above/Underground Storage Tank Size: WASHINGTON STATE NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE Plans Examiner: Phone: Fax: Address: City Inspector: Phone: Address: State Fax: - Zip City State Zip SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ❑ BOLTING ❑ CONCRETE Firm Name: ❑ REINFORCEMENT ❑ WELDING Phone: Fax: Inspector(s): DISCLAIMER The permitee verifies, acknowledges and agrees by their signature that: 1) If this permit is for construction of or on a ' dwelling; the dwelling is/will be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley Permit inure to the property owner. 3) The signatory is the property owner or has permission to represent the property owner in this transaction. 4) All construction is to be done in full compliance with the City of Spokane Valley Development Code. Referenced codes are available for review at the City of Spokane Valley Permit Center. 5) This City of Spokane Valley Permit is not a permit or approval for any violation of federal, state or local laws, codes or ordinances. Ownership of resulting development rights granted by any issued permit inure to th- property ow r. Print Name Signature -- Method Method of Payment: (Faxed permit applications will only be accepted with major bankcard) ❑ Cash ❑ .Check ❑ Mastercard Bankcard #: Authorized Signature: ❑ VISA Expires: VIN#: Other File Help I. .117f -P II Type a question for help 1,,21.-0, fo, Properly Number 45072.1603 Values ope Atter Properl Site Addr L Descrip 11 CENTER RD C RV SUB HOME PT OF B16 BEG 299.85FT E Of SWCOR TII tI PAR TU WL 110E7 E TO EL S11SFT TO SECOR W TO Taxes Sales Info Seg,Merge Property Type Active E State Assessed t' Real Mobge E Improvement Dist trona! C E Preliminary Imp Distil Everts ` !min ovementa Active Exemptions 03 5.0010350 Data as of: Saturday. Much 22, .2003 Tuesday, Jun 08, 2004 12:25 PM AODREsg ZONE ROAD FArnial eT COMMENTS fismaNG frAL fREVIEWEDEry This site pian is being submitted Tor . the purpose of obtaining-Ibuilding porn* and is a hue and couect represent/4ton of -the proposal. . property linesicantensions. curb lines, structures and easements hays - been Identified. Also Indicated ere raellende, Signed: ' bodies of- vadat - areas. • Date; PLANNING DEPT. AMMO DATE: . AD • ct,.° A tr. \ 643 -1;4. -)-el • r •a c j) AOZDDRESS ROAD Flippo COMMENREVIEWED This she plan is being submitted for the purpose of obtaining a building prom* and is a hus and correct representation of the proposal. AN known pro'p+gy lines/dimensions, curb Nnss, structures and easements have been bodies of identified. also ♦•haled orewelends, critical areas. Signed: Date: MANN ANNOYED DATE. t DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY'DEVELOPMEN _.CURRENT PL'ANNING DIVISION' STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2004 DATE DECISION MAILED: June 24, 2004 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ADV -13-04 - Request for approval of an administrative variance to reduce side yard setbacks for an accessory structure from fourteen (14) feet to ten (10) feet six (6) inches, a twenty-five (25) percent reduction. PROPOSAL LOCATION: Parcel No. 45072.1603, further identified as 2405 N. Center Rd. This parcel is located approximately 400 feet north of Trent Avenue, in the Northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North., Range 45 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. APPLICANT: Autumn Cover, 2403 S. Best Rd., Spokane Valley, WA 99037 PROPERTY OWNER: Mike and Judy Thew, 2405 N. Center, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Section 14.404.090 (Administrative Variance), and Section 14.616 UR 3.5 (Urban Residential 3.5) of the Interim Spokane Valley Zoning Code. DECISION: The Department of Community Development, Current Planning Division, after review and consideration of the request and applicable approval criteria APPROVES ADV — 13 — 04 subiect to the conditions stated herein. STAFF PLANNER: Heather Kauer, Planning Technician, Current Planning Division, Spokane Valley Community Development Department. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Administrative Variance Request Submittal Exhibit 4: Submitted Building Permit (BLD -04-03563) Staff Report and Notice of Decision for ADV -13-04 June 25, 2004 1 of 5 I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Pursuant to the Administrative Variance application submitted by the applicant on June 10, 2004, the administrative variance request is for a decrease in the side yard setback for an accessory structure with a height of 24 feet to the peak of the building from fourteen (14) feet to ten (10) feet six (6) inches. This proposal represents a twenty-five (25) percent decrease in side yard setback. The applicant in the submitted application specifies that the purpose of the request is to allow for more space to maneuver a motor home or boat on the lot. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Characteristics: Parcel No. 45072.1603 is 33,000 square feet or .76 of an acre. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Existing Zoning: Urban Residential -3.5 Existing Land Use: Single-family residential SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ZONING AND LAND USES: North: Comprehensive Plan — Low Density Residential Zoning — Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) Existing Land Uses: single family residence South: Comprehensive Plan — Low Density Residential Zoning — Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) Existing Land Uses: single-family residences East: Comprehensive Plan —Low Density Residential Zoning - Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) Existing Land Uses: Single-family residences West: Comprehensive Plan — Low Density Residential Zoning - Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) Existing Land Uses: single-family residences SERVICES: Streets: Center Road is designated as a local access street. Sewer: The lot is currently served by a septic system. Water: Water service is provided by Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist. #6 Public Transportation: The subject parcel is located inside the jurisdiction of the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA). Schools: The subject parcel is located within the boundaries of West Valley School District. Parks: The nearest park is Park Road Pool. Fire District: The site is located inside the boundaries of Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Staff Report and Notice of Decision for ADV -13-04 June 25, 2004 2 of 5 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA): Findings: Ordinance No. 48 (effective March 31, 2003) adopted on an interim basis by reference the Spokane Environmental Ordinance (Spokane County) thereby implementing the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Spokane Valley. The Current Planning Division determined that the request is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800-6.b (Minor Land Use Decisions). Conclusion(s): Staff concludes that compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is not required. ZONING CODE CONFORMITY: Findings: Section 14.404.090 (Administrative Variance) Section 14.404.09.0 (Conditions for Granting an Administrative Variance) specifies the approval criteria for the granting of an administrative variance, all of which must be complied with, if applicable. The following are staff's findings and conclusion (s) for each of the criterion: 1. The administrative variance does not detract from the desired character and nature of the vicinity in which it is proposed. Finding (s): The subject property is zoned Urban Residential -3.5 and is currently occupied by a single- family home. Surrounding, abutting and adjacent properties are also zoned UR -3.5 and are residential in nature. The administrative variance request is to receive approval to reduce side yard setbacks for an accessory structure from fourteen (14) feet to ten (10) feet six (6) inches, a twenty-five (25) percent reduction. The purpose of the administrative variance request is to allow for more space to maneuver a motor home or boat on the lot. Pursuant to Section 14.616.325.6.2 of the Spokane Valley Interim Zoning Code, the minimum side yard setback of an accessory structure without an administrative variance authorization is five (5) from the property line for the first fifteen (15) feet of height to the peak of the building and an additional foot of setback for each additional foot of height. The applicant's request seeks authorization to encroach into the required front yard setback by 3.5 feet. No other modifications to the UR -3.5 zoning standards are proposed by the applicant. The administrative variance request will not by itself change the existing residential character of the subject property as the proposed setback is an acceptable and reasonable land use for the existing single-family purposes of the subject property. Conclusion (s): Criterion 1 is satisfied. The administrative variance request will not by itself change the existing residential character of the subject property or surrounding properties. 2. The administrative variance enhances or protects the character of the neighborhood or vicinity by protecting natural features, historic sites, open space, or other resources. Finding (s): The subject property is currently used for a single-family residential use. Staff has reviewed applicable adopted plans and maps including the City of Spokane Valley Interim Critical Areas Maps, the City of Spokane Valley Interim Shorelines Management Program and the Federal Emergency Staff Report and Notice of Decision for ADV -13-04 June 25, 2004 3 of 5 Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (Community Panel No. 530174 300 C dated September 30, 1992) and has determined that there are no natural features, historic sites, open space or other such resources at or near the site Conclusion (s): Criteria 2 is not applicable. 3. The administrative variance does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies. Finding (s): The operations of existing land uses surrounding the property are similar to those on the subject property (i.e. single-family residential use). The adjacent property to the south has an existing detached garage that is approximately five (5) feet away from the property line between the two lots. There is also a fence and landscaping dividing the two properties. The proposed 10.5 feet of setback would still provide ample room between structures to allow for emergency access. The height of the proposed structure, although relatively tall for an accessory structure, meets the height requirement for the existing zoning designation and would not interfere with light exposure to any of the surrounding properties. Conclusion (s): Criterion 3 is satisfied because the administrative variance does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies. 4. Granting the administrative variance does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare within the City. Finding (s): The proposed reduction of setback for the accessory structure would not impact emergency personnel's ability to access the lot or surrounding lots because there will still be a minimum of ten (10) foot six (6) inch side yard setback. Staff finds that the side yard setback authorized by the administrative variance request would not interfere with requirements for emergency access nor would this structure be constructed at or near close proximity to the subject property lines. Conclusion (s): Criterion 4 is satisfied because the granting of the administrative variance does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety or welfare to the public within the City. 5. In addition to the above conditions a variance may be issued when the following specific conditions exist: a. A parcel prior to the adoption of this zoning ordinance did not meet the buildable square footage requirements for a parcel in a particular zoning district. b. A dwelling has been rendered legal non -conforming due to setback, height and size and thus cannot be expanded or otherwise reconstructed in a particular zoning district; or c. Where duplexes are permitted, but due to dwelling (s) having been built prior to the adoption of this zoning ordinance, the minimum size parcel cannot be met, an administrative variance may allow the existing building or buildings to be reconstructed as a duplex. Finding (s): The subject property meets current buildable square footage requirements as specified in Section 14.616 (Urban Residential -3.5) of the Spokane Valley Interim Zoning Code. The City has not classified the existing on-site dwelling as a legal non -conforming dwelling. The existing on-site dwelling is currently intended for single-family use only, and is not proposed for reconstruction or reclassification. Conclusion (s): Criteria 5. a -c are not applicable. Staff Report and Notice of Decision for ADV -13-04 June 25, 2004 4 of 5 III.. DECISION Based on the preceding analysis, the Current Planning Division staff concludes that the administrative variance request meets the required criteria and therefore APPROVES ADV -13-04 subject to conformance with the following conditions of approval: 1. The allowable side yard setback for the previously constructed deck cover shall be a minimum of 10.5 feet from the side property line. This does not give allowance for any new construction without the necessary permits as well as complying with current setback requirements. 2. The applicant shall obtain an approved building permit from the City of Spokane Valley Building Division for the previously constructed deck cover. 3. The applicant shall obtain an approved Right -of -Way Approach permit from the City of Spokane Valley Engineering Division prior to the construction of any driveways. IV. APPEAL OF DECISION Pursuant to Section 13.900 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Application Review Procedures for Project Permits", a written appeal of the Staff Report and Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date the notice of the decision is mailed. Pursuant to Section 13.900.110 (Contents), an appeal shall contain all of the following information: 1. The file number designated by the review authority and the name of the applicant. 2. The name, address and signature of the appellant and a statement regarding the legal standing of the appellant to appeal. If multiple parties file a single appeal, they shall designate one part as the representative for all contact with the review authority. 3. The specific aspect (s) of the permit decision and/or SEPA issue being appealed, the reasons why each aspect is in error as a matter of fact or law, and the evidence relied upon to support allegations of error. 4. All statutory requirements for appeals of land use decisions of land use decisions, including land use petitions filed in superior court pursuant to RCW 36.70C shall be complied with. 5. Any required appeal fees. Pursuant to the currently adopted Fee Schedule, the current fee for an appeal of an administrative decision is $250.00. Please note that that this fee may be changed by City Council adoption of an ordinance updating the Fee Schedule. Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public hearing on appeals of administrative decisions made by the Current Planning Division. Pursuant to Section 11 of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the appeal shall be final and conclusive and shall have the effect of a final decision of the City Council. Standing to appeal a decision shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.900.102 (General). Staff Report and Notice of Decision for ADV -13-04 June 25, 2004 5 of 5