Loading...
ZE-02-97 r . . t . , SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: Zone Reclassification from the ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Community Business (B-2) and ) CONCLUSIONS, Industrial Park (I-1) Zones to Light ) AND DECISION Industrial (I-2) Zone Applicant: Crown West Realty ) File No.: ZE-2-97 ) 1. SUNIlVIARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION Proposal: Zone reclassification from the Community Business (B-2) and Industrial Park (I-1) zones to the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, for development of a hotel, restaurants, offices and those uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone. Decision: Approved, subject to conditions. U. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS . The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: F. J. Dullanty, 1100 U. S. Bank Building, Spokane, WA 99201 Owner: Crown West Realty, 3808 North Sullivan, Bldg. N-15, Spokane, WA 99201 Agent: Frank Ide, Taylor Engineering, 106 West Mission, Spokane, WA 99201 Address: 3808 North Sullivan Road Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road, approximately 1,600 feet south of Trent Road in the SW '/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Legal Description: That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Townslup 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the SW '/4 of said Section 1, thence S. 00°35'S6" E., . along the West line of said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence 5.89°49'36" E., 522.25 feet, to the True Point of Beg-inning of this description; thence continue 5.89°49'36" E., 303.75 feet; thence 5.00003'31" W., 1219.89 feet; thence N.89°49'36" W., 518.00 feet; thence N. 00003'31" E., HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 1 r . ~r • i . 210.00 feet, thence 5.89049'36" E., 314.25 feet; thence N. 00003'31 E., 729.89 feet; thence N. • 89049'36" W., 100.00 feet; thence N. 00003'31" E., 280.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning Together with that portion of the SW '/4 of Section l, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington described as follows: . Corrimencing at the Northwest corner of the SW '/4 of said Section 1, thence S. 00°35'S6" E., along the West line of said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence 5.89049'36" E., 50.00 feet to the East right-of-way line of Sullivan Road and the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence S.89049'36" E., 472.25 feet; thence 5.00°03'31" W., 280.00 feet; thence S.89°49'36" E., 100.00 feet; thence S.00°03'31" W., 729.89 feet; thence N 89°49'36" W., 314.25 feet; thence 5.00°03'31" W., 210.00 feet; thence N.89°49'36" W., 244.00 feet, to the East right-of-way line of Sullivan Road; thence N. 00°35'S6" W., along said right-of-way line, 1220.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Zoning: Community Business (B-2) and Industrial Park (I-1) Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Industrial category of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The property is also located within the Priority SLwer Service Area, Aquifer Sensitive Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Plan. Environmental Review: A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division of Building and Planning on March 25, 1997. Site Description: The site is approximately 21.5 acres in size, and is rectangular in shape. The property is relatively flat, and has groomed lawns and moderate -tree cover. Three buildings currently exist at corners of the site, housing an office, delicatessen/restaurant and vacant office building. An unpaved parking lot lies along the east border of the site, with a smaller parking lot in the interior. A cyclone fence and overhead transmission line are found along the west border. Private roads border the site on the north and east. _ Surrounding Conditions: The site is located along the east side of Sullivan Road, which is designated on the County's Arterial Road Plan as a Principal Arterial. State Route 290 (Trent Avenue) is located approximately '/4 mile north of the site, and Euclid Avenue, a Collector Arterial, is located less than 800 feet to the south. The property lies within the Spokane Industrial Park. The Industrial Park is owned by the applicant, Crown V17est Realty, which leases space to the various uses and manages the park. The sunounding neighborhood consists of a wide variety of industrial uses and services east of Sullivan Road, both within and outside the Industrial Park. Kaiser Aluminum's Trentwood plant is located west of the site across Sullivan Road, a gravel mining operation is located to the south, and a solid waste transfer/recycling station is located to the northwest. Project Description: The site plan of record illustrates an existing office building; eight proposed buildings for use as a hotel, restaurant and speculative commerciaUindustrial area; and two construction pads for future development of a fast food restaurant and convenience store. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 2 . ' Access to the site would be provided directly from Sullivan Road, the existing private roads and internal access easements. The Washington State Department of Transportation has requested thafi the applicant mitigate the impact of the proj ect on SR-290. County Engineering has requested that the applicant make road improvements and dedicate right of way along Sullivan Road, and fund pedestrian signalization and movement of traffic signals at Sullivan Road and Kiernan AvenueB Street, near the northwest corner of the site. The proposal will be served by public sewer and water, and modern utilities. If approved, the land would remain divided according to an earlier binding site plan approved for the site, with the new rezone conditions replacing the old binding site plan conditions. A binding site plan application would need to be filed to allow any further division of the site. B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14.402 and 14.632. Hearing Date and Locatioa: April 16, 1997; Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA. Notices: Mailed: March 31, 1997 by applicant Posted: March 31, 1997 by applicant Published: March 28, 1997 Compliance: The legal -requirements for public notice have been met. Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance) and 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure). Testimony: Francine Shaw Pat Harper Division of Building and Planning Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 Charles Studer F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Spokane County Air Pollution Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole 1101 West College 1100 U. S. Bank Building Spokane, WA Spokane, WA 99201 Richard Rollnick, President Greg Figg Crown West Realty WA State Department of Transportation 4225 South Ball Drive 2714 North Mayfair Veradale, WA 99037 Spokane, WA 99207 Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, County Code, County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee decision dated 11-18-94 in File No. ZE-41-94, and Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 3 . , . C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS: In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that (1) there is no presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and (3) the rezone proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. ParkridQe v. Seattle, 98 Wn. 2d 4541462 (1978); Biarnson v. Kitsap Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840 i ~ (1995). SPokane CountY Zoning Code Section 14.402 (1)(2) ndicates that consistencY with the Comprehensive Plan, detriment to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant criteria to consider in amending the Zoning Code. The proposed rezone must also be consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act, the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations. Conditions may be imposed to assure the consistency of the proposal with applicable regulations. The following findings of fact and conclusions are made: 1. The nronosal izenerallv conforms with the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. a. Relevance of Comprehensive Plan A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearing body in making a rezone decision. Belcher v. Kitsan Countv, 60 Wn. App. 949, 953 (1991). Deviation from a comprehensive plan does not necessarily render a rezone illegal, only general conformance is normally required. Bassani v. Countv Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 396 (1993); Cathcart v. Snohomish Countv, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in determining whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani, supra, at 396-98. Recent cases have held that changed circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements the policies of a comprehensive plan. Biarnson v. Kitsav Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840, 846 (1995); Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983). b. Applicable policies The property is located within the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Industrial category is intended to provide the opportunity for industrial development and reserve land for industrial purposes. The Industrial category will be composed of a variety of industrial, mining and transportation uses. Few commercial and residential uses will be found. Typically, small-scale activities related to industrial uses such as cafes, service stations, parts and service stores will be characteristic of industrial areas. Other commercial services may be provided to serve the industrial businesses and employees as industrial areas develop. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 7. Objective 7.2.a encourages balanced communities of commercial, industrial and residential development in a compatible relationship. Decision Guideline 7.3.1 indicates that industrial and commercial uses being proposed as one development may be allowed in the Industrial category when the development proposal conforms to County sewer, water, utility and transportation plans, identifies and takes steps to resolve significant HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 4 adverse impacts upon existing infrastructure and provide necessary landscaping and buffering. The Industrial category discourages strictly non-industrial proposals unless it is shown that the land involved is near other non-industrial land use categories, that there is sufficient remaining land in the Industrial category to meet existing or near future industrial needs, and the proposal is compatible with existing or potential industrial uses through buffering or suitable development covenants. See Decision Guideline 7.2.5. Buffering is recommended between proposed and existing development, particularly when heavy industrial development is located adjacent to light industrial or commercial i uses. See Decision Guidelines 7.1.4 and 7.2.2. - The property is also located within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated in the Comprehensive Plan. This is an area where growth, development and higher intensities of land use are encouraged. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.a. The UTA section of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that traditional urban problems such as incompatible land uses, environmental pollution and traffic congestion will be managed with greater attention to the general public's well-being inside the UTA. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.e. c. Consistency of proposal with applicable policies The applicant proposes to rezone the site to the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, for development of a 59-room hotel, restaurants, office and other unspecified uses allowed in the I-2 zone. The Staff Report expressed concern that the proposal could be developed with strictly commercial uses, in a manner inconsistent with the policies of the Indusfirial category. However, the Staff Report also found that the proposal was consistent with the majority of the policies of • such category, and recommended approval of the proposal. No opposition was expressed to the proposal at the public hearing. A letter of opposition dated February 18, 1997 was received from Rogers Machinery Company, Inc., which opposed the project because of its non-industrial nature. Such industrial use is located southeast of the site, along Euclid Avenue. The Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority also expressed concem that toxic emissions or offensive odors from industrial uses that could be developed on the site might create conflicts with other uses on the site, such as the proposed hotel. Zoning Code 14.632.1001ays out the purpose and intent of the I-2 zone as follows: The purpose of the I-2 zone is to meet the needs for industrial land identified in the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan. Industrial uses in this zone will include processing, fabrication, light assembly, freight handling and similar operations of a non-offensive nature. It is the intent of the I-2 zone to allow for those uses by making them compatible with surrounding zcses. General characteristics of these areas include paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit accessibility. The record reflects that in 1994, the westerly 13.7 acres of the site was rezoned from the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone to the Community Business (B-2) zone, for offices, retail sales, restaurant and other B-2 uses; while the easterly 7.8 acres were rezoned from the I-3 zone to the Industrial Park (I-1) zone, for light assembly, offices and those uses allowed in the I-1 zone. See Hearing Examiner Committee decision in File No. ZE-41-94, dated 11-18-94. The Hearing HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 5 . . . Examiner Committee indicated in its findings that the unique nature of the Industrial Park neighborhood supported the establishment of B-2 zoning to provide services to the tenants of the industrial park and adjacent land uses, and that the location and conceptual design of the 1994 proposal assured the consistency of the B-2 zoning with the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan. A binding site plan was also approved for the 1994 rezone proposal: In 1996, the Board of County Commissioners amended the Industrial Zones Matrix of the , Zoning Code to add a variety of new listed commercial and manufacturing uses, as well as virtually all the uses permitted in the B-3 zone; provided that B-3 uses allowed in the I-2 zone were required to meet the development standards of the B-3 zone. Zoning Code Chapter 14.629. The Board did not revise tbe policies of the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan, or the putpose and intent section of the I-2 zone, to allow these amendments. This virtually . unrestricted allowance of B-3 uses in the I-2 zone is difficult to reconcile with the policies of the Industrial category, which discourages completely non-industrial proposals unless specific criteria are met. However, Washington cases indicate that zoning regulations control over inconsistent policies in a comprehensive plan. See Hansen v. Chelan Countv, 81 Wn. App 133,138 (1996); Weverhaeuser v. Pierce Countv, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); and Couear Mt. Assocs. v. Kiniz Countv, 111 Wn.2d 742, 755-57 (1988). The applicant indicated that the proposal was essentially replacing the speculative office uses provided for in the 1994 rezone of the site with speculative industrial and warehouse uses, and that I-2 zoning would provide more flexibility and a wider array of uses than either the I-1, I-2 or B-2 zones. See testimony of F.J. Dullanty, Jr. The applicant further indicated that the proposed uses on the site would help serve some of the service needs for the industrial uses on the site and the surrounding heavy industrial uses. This is conceivable, since workers need meals served during the day, industry-related office uses are common, and a hotel can accommodate out of town, suppliers, customers and employees of industrial uses. The applicant also pointed out Crown West Realty, Inc., the owner of the site and the Industrial Park real estate and improvements, is the sponsor of the project. This provides some assurance that the uses located on the site will be compatible internally and with adjacent land uses. The proposal could be viewed as a mix of compatible industrial and commercial uses in a unified development plan, thereby implementing Industrial category policies. The traffic study prepared for the proposal by the applicant's engineering firm indicates that the proposal is likely to have a reduced traffic impact during the weekday and on Saturday than would be generated by the uses approved for the 1994 rezone, although Sunday traffic would be significantly increased. See Taylor Engineering, Inc. dated December 24, 1996. The traffic study numbers are a bit soft, in the Examiner's estimation, since there is no guarantee that the entire site will not be developed for B-3 type commercial uses. However, the likelihood of such scenario seems a bit speculative, considering the ownership of the site by the owner of the Industrial Park. The applicant has agreed to make needed road improvements along Sullivan Road, fund improvements to facilitate pedestrian access to the site, fund the relocation of traffic signals at the northwest corner of the site, and enter into a voluntary agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to proportionately mitigate the impact of the proposal on the Sullivan Road/SR-290 Interchange. The proposal also restricts access to Sullivan Road to two locations, which could be limited to right-in and right-out movements. See County Engineering conditions of approval, below. The proposal will be served by public sewer and water. Overall, the proposal implements the policies of the Industrial HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 6 . . , ~ r. category recommending consistency with adopted transportation, water, sewer, utility and other infrastructure policies. The main concern of the Examiner is the location of the hotel near industrial uses that would generate noise, light, odor or traffic conflicts for the hotel. The SCAPCA conditions outlined in the Examiner's May 1, 19971etter to the applicant should resolve most concerns regarding potential odor and noise conflicts. The additional landscaping required by Zoning Code 14.802.220, for parking lots and where parking lots front along an adjacent public or private right of way, will help assure adequate buffering between uses. The Hearing Examiner has also added a condition requiring that the hotel on the site be buffered from any lawful negative land use impacts generated by industrial uses located near the hotel, and that any industrial uses located on the site must be compatible with other uses located on the site. 2. Conditions in the area in which the propertv is located have changed substantiallv since the pronertv was last zoned. In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors, including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal, and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic, technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. Countv Commissioners. 70 Wn. App! 389, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan. Biarnson, at 846; Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983). As discussed above, the proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. There is also evidence of changed conditions in the area since the last zoning of the site, including the 1996 amendment to the Zoning Code allowing general B-3 and other new commercial uses to the I-2 zone. 3. The nronosed rezone bears a substantial relationship and is not detrimental to the public health, safetv and eeneral welfare. . General consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in determining whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani, at 396-98. As noted, the proposal generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Little opposition was expressed to the proposal. The proposed commercial uses in the proposal, which are in proximity to Sullivan Road, will likely be buffered from adjacent uses by light industrial or warehouse uses. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 7 . • • . • . ( i 4. The nronosed zone chanee, as conditioned, complies with the provisions of the State Environmental Policv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance. The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code have been met. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning. No adverse comments were . received from public agencies that would dictate a need for withdrawal of such environmental determination. ' 5. The nronosal, as conditioned, complies with the Lip-ht Industrial (I-2) zone, the Snokane Countv Zonine Code (SCZC). and annlicable land use reRulations. The proposal has been conditioned for compliance with the applicable requirements of the Zoning Code and other land use regulations. Detailed review for compliance with code requirements will occur prior to the issuance of a building permit There is no evidence indicating that applicable regulations cannot be met by the applicant. III. DECISION Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a zone reclassification is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies • specified below. Any new or substantially revised conditions added by the Hearing Examiner have been italicized. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1. The proposal shall comply with the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, as amended. 2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. Approval is required by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building pernuts. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 8 . , . ~t . 5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planni.ng/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. . 6. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noring that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall . generaily provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the su6ject of a land use action - by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on April 16,1997 imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-2-97 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane Division of Building and Planning. 7. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: . "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: 8. Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating add.itional lots/parcels shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee for compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable local, state and federal ordinances and development regulations, as amended 9. The applicant shall make reasonable efforts to buffer the proposed hotel from any negative impacts such as air, noise, and light lawfully generated by existing industrial uses. Any industrial uses located on the site shall be compatible with other land uses located on the site. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits and improvements to the county road system shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 9 . • - . ~ 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. Construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as . approved by the Spokane County Engineer. , 5. The County Engineer has designated a 6 Lane Principal Roadway Section for the improvement of Sullivan Road which is adj acent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 7. Access to Sullivan Road shall be limited to that as proposed in the site plan of record until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. This approach may be , limited to right-in/right-out based on traffic volume and the ability of drivers to make safe full movement turns at this location of Sullivan Road at some time in the future. 8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 12. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County right of way per Spokane County Standards. 13. Applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on Sullivan Road for right of way purposes along the frontage of the development. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 10 I h, 14. The applicant shall enter into a"Developer Agreement" to provide fees for pedestrian signalization and movement of existing standards for the existing signals at Sullivan Road and Kiernan AvenueB Street. Said agreement shall include timing of construction by the applicant of all roadway infrastructure specified herein and fees not to exceed $40,000 for the aforementioned pedestrian signalization and movement of existing signal standards. Such , agreement is regarded as a site improvement and does not need to comply with the requirements of RCW 82. 02.030. ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated tluough the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. . 4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. . 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer connection permit is required. 2. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. 3. The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit. 4. Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. 5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended and as applicable. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 11 . • . . . ' SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All applicable air pollution regulations must be met. 2. A notice of construction and application for approval must be submitted to and approved by SCAPCA prior to the construction, installation or establishment of any air pollution source. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any use, the permit applicant shall contact SCAPCA to determine if a notice of construction is required. ; 3. The applicant or owner of the site shall provide a copy of letter dated March 27, 1997 from SCAPCA to the County Division of Building and Planning regarding File No. ZE-2-97 to each potential tenant of tbe site. 4. The applicant or owner of the site shall confer with SCAPCA prior to issuance of the first building permit for the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. The project sponsor (applicant) shall enter into a voluntary agreement with WSDOT to pay a sum of $30,000 to WSDOT for the traffic impacts associated with the rezone and development of this property. This payment to WSDOT shall be due no sooner that 1 year and no later than 3 years from the date the rezone is approved by Spokane County. Payment to WSDOT within this window shall be due within 30 days when requested by WSDOT in writing to the project sponsor and/or current property owner. In turn, WSDOT shall use these funds to design and construct improvements to the Sullivan Road and Trent (SR-290) Interchange. This mitigation agreement shall conform to the provisions of voluntary agreements as outlined in RCW 82.02.030. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 12 DATED this 301'' day of June, 1997. + SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex;AMINER c. Micl&l C. Dempsey, WSBA #901 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA determination is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9) indicates tiiat administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be filed with the legislative body within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the decision. This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on June 30, 1997. DEPENDING ON WHICH APPEAL PERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGALLY APPLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER JULY 10,1997 OR JULY 149 1997. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245. The file may be inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County ordinance. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-97 Page 13 . ~ ~ • a DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into on the date last written below by and between and Crown West Realty, L.L.C. ("Crown West") and Spokane County ("County"), a political subdivision of the State of Washington. RECITALS I. Crown West is the owner of certain real property general:y located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road south of Trent Avenue, and legally described per Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Said property consists of 50 acres. II. The County had previously enacted a zone classification of I-3. Crown West has received approval of a binding side plan under BSP-60-98 from County in order to subdivide said property and allow for the development of those uses which are allowed in the I-3 or compatible zone. III. The development of the proAerty under BSP-60-98 for uses allowed in the I-3 zone will directly impact access from Interstate 90 from Sullivan Road. As a condition of approval Crown West is required to participate in certain improvements to the Sullivan Road/Interstate 90 ("I-90") Interchange. IV. Said improvements to I-90 and Sullivan Road are not only reasonably necessary and directly related to BSP-60-98, but they are also reasonably capable of being accomplished. V. Pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.060, RCW 82.02.020, and Article XI § l 1 of the Washington - 1- G'1DOC\FJD\CRO%%'MDEVELOP I . AGR • ~ • ' State Constitution, the County has the authority to impose mitigation fees for the costs of certain road projects made necessary by development. NQW THEREFORE, ihe Parties agree as follows: 1. Mitigation Fee Crown West shall pay the total sum of $100,000 as traffic mitigation fee towards the construction of the revised west bound loop ramp at Sullivan and I-90. 2. Payment The funds shall be paid as follows: (a) A portion of the traffic mitigation fee shall be paid by Crown West at the time an initial building permit application is made to the County for each parcel ofproperty within BSP-60- 98. (b) The traffic mitigation fee due with each building permit application shall be based upon the number of acres in the parcel of real property on which the development will occur. (c) The fee shall be one time and shall be $2,000 per acre. 3. Compliance witb Conditions The County agrees that Crown West's execution of this Agreement constitutes compliance with engineer's condition number 9 of BSP-60-98. 4. Compliance with RCW 82.02.020. (a) Each payment collected by the County shall be held in a mitigation fee reserve account and may only be expended to fund the construction of a revised west bound loop ramp at Sullivan/I-90 (the "Improvement"). (b) The payment collected upon submittal of each building permit application shall be expended by the County within five years of collection. The County shall be entitled to reimbursement from the mitigation fee reserve account for any funds it may expend for the - 2- G1DOC1FJDICROWMDEVELOPI AGR . u ' construction of the improvement prior to collection of the fee. (c) Any funds in the mitigation fee reserve account not expended within five years shall be refunded with interest as provided in RCW 82.02.020. 5. General terms: (a) No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be effective unless executed in writing with the same formalities attendant to execution of this Agreement. (b) This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and the assigns of the parties. (c) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any action for enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Spokane County, Washington or as otherwise provided by statute. (d) No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. 6. Miscellaneous. (a) The County shall hold Crown West harmless for the failure to collect any mitigation fee which may be due herein. (b) The County shall not collect any other traffic mitigation fees for property within BSP-60-98, for a period of 10 years except as provided herein, so long as the uses remain similiar to the current I-3 zoning which is now in effect. 7. Termination of Agreement. The right to collect mitigation fees under this Agreement shall terminate ten (10) years after its execution by the parties herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as to the date written above. ~ - G.1DOLlF1D1CR01VNWEVELOPI AGR SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of Washington State ;r/- C'6airman Date:~ CR(J WN WEST REALTY, a Washington Limited Liability Company ~ 2 y` r `fr"~, Itgc. Date l.~ 3 - ~ - 4- G:1DOC1FJDICRO%VMDEYELOP I .AGR , • ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) , On this JA day of Dec emher , 1998, before me personally appeared to me know to be the of Spokane County, a political subdivision of Washington State, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in an or the State of Washington, residing at j*--ZA.X My appointment e x p i r e s STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF D c;- (o P. q ) On this day of { , c• h-r~ t.r r- , 1998, before me personally appeared ~irhnrc4 ~►~~~c~,~c••r , to me know to be the orqof Crown West Realty L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, the company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. --Fi'~ ~1i . i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at : c. x n r:,~ r/ My appointmentr 111Ne% s ........r K ~,~•~SS1e)v F i : f I No raRt- ~ m : i . ~ ~j~ N _ pV~3LiC . ,1~~'8 1_p2 G \DOC\F7D1CR0%\`N\DH%'ELOPI AGR , , . . ,.r~ r ~ 1\►'VASN\c' ~1~~~~~ . . . ` • e `RESOLUTION NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF AUTHORIZING ) DEVELOPER AGREEMENT WITH ) A M E N D I N G CROWN WEST REALTY FOR IMPROVEMENT ) R E S O L U T I O N OF SULLIVAN ROAD/I-90 IN CONNECTION ) WITH BINDING SITE PLAN NO. 60-98 ) WHEREAS, the development of Binding Site Plan No. 60-98 involves the financial participation in the improvement of Sullivan Road and Interstate 90 Interchange; and WHEREAS, the developer and county staff have prepared a"Development Agreement" enumerating the requirements and obligation of the parties in the project and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington approved the agreement by Resolution No. 98-0900 on November 17, 1998; and WHEREAS, the developer and county staff recognized an error in the originai agreement, which has been corrected and the County Engineer recommends that the agreement as revised can now be formalized between the parties. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington that the revised agreement between Crown West Realty L.L.C. and Spokane County, bearing a date of December 8, 1998, is hereby approved and the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute the same by and on behalf of Spokane County. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 8th day of December, 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 4PtLIP D. YWI ARRIS, CHAIRMAN . 04 cO rol . .y M. KATE Mc ASLIN, VICE-CHAIR . ;1\ . V 1` 1 1_i~.. _ IlAd_ ~~1 1• . ' ' ' • , c(.-' 3 ROSKELLEY ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD / • . 'zoop B1~ / DANIELA ERICKSON, DEPUTY I1v\reslgenlDS P.60.98 CamriLd ENGINEER' S RIVIEW SHEET Date Filcd Date As Built Plun Ra:co.•rd Date itDuci Ptans Appmvcd REZONE FILE #ZE-002-97 -97 Ncw Roat1 Standards 5-15•95 M~lar a: Companion File KLtated Fiie 'LC-(W 1-9-1,BSP-39-95 I Hearing Date: 04/16l199+ H Time: 09:00 H Number: 1 DESIGN Review Dave: 01109II997 DR Timc: 01:30- &lsV'Al Buitding Dept Review Date: 12/1311996 R Time: R Number: DESIGN ItEYIEW A+ DRZE-246-97 Date Received: 12/0311996 Review Type:: LdrBe 1-°t Bldg. Squarc Fect No. L.ots: iVo. Acms: 21.70 Projet:t Name: 1-1 & B-2 TO I-2 CROIYN BU57NLS,S PK Rnngt-Township-Sectivn: 44-25-1 Site Address: E SULLIVAN/N EUCLID/S KIERNAN PAxcFi.(5): (frst 20) Applicant Name: FJ DUI.L.ANTY IR Phone 624-5265 45016.9091 Applii;ant Ackiress: W-K- DAVENPORT & TOOLE Phone 2# 110 US BANK BLDG SPOKlUNE W A 99201 L)ate Corxlitio" Maileci: L~-~- 7 G ~ -~----f Flaxi Zone: No Water Source: Sewcr Suurce: Schaol Dist: 361 Firr Dist: 1 Phnne Dist: Billiag Name: Owner: CROWIV WEST' REAL'i`1' LLC Engineer: LAWREhCE LEIVWIDER Address: Qwner Address: 3808 N Sl.iLL1VAN RD BLDC1 N- Company: TAYt,OR ENGINEER.ING INC. 15 Address: 106 w MISStON STE 206 5POKANE WA 99216 SPOKADVE WA 94201 Phone: Owner Pttone: 9241720 Phone: 328-3371 Fex: (509) 328-5224 Signed Name Building # 456•2205 / Planning # 456-3675 Cuntact: FRANCINE 5H.AW Date Submitted Description Inittah c)1/0211yy? DATE TECI4IVICALLY COMPt..ETE (Traffic Attalysis Raquirtd) 12/ t21 t99G DATE NOT TECHMCALLY COMPLCTE D ATE PAY FEFS RE:GEIVED DA7E PRIORITY FEES RECEtVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEFS COMPLL-TED ANU COPY TO ACCOUNTING i / NOTICE TO PUBLIC I NOTICE TO PUBL(C # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS 'f0 BF 51GNED In tn,i #1 tra-O» X: in-0ut t3 DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT tn-Qut 04 Ia-(hu ay in-Ous ArG I ! HOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CAI.CULATED DATE 80ND RECEiVED BOND AMOUNT RECEiVED I)ATE BOND RELF.ASL• - DAT"E IIOND REDUCED BOND BALANGE Eicxring Date Der,ision Approved [?ciuetl Contitwcei Appcaled BCC Appcoved Denieti Appcalod to Courc Approvcd Denied Contimied Fim1 Pm}cci Staau STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TCCHNICUIN (SYL) STAMPED 208 LOT pLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY) M _ ~~~led ENGINEEA' S KEVIEW SHEET Date Filed Datr As Built PE:ins Krccivzd Datt Road Plan-s Apgrovul DR REZONE FILE # ZE-OOG-77 Ncw• Road StAndards 5-15-95 Mytar Gompanion Filc Rclatcd Fiir ZE-041-94,BSP-39-93 Heating Date: H 'Cime: H Nucnber: DE,SIGN Review DAte: 01/09/1997 DR Timc: 01:30 ~4h Cu"~ / Buiiciing Dept Iteview Date: 12/13/1996 R Time: R Number: DESIGY REVIEW M DRZE-246-97 Dnte Rec:erved: ! 2/03/ 199b Review Type: Lar8r Lot Bidg. Squure Fr.ct: No. L.ots: Nn. Acres: : i. 70 Project Name: I-! & B-2 TO I-2 CROWN BUSINESS PK RaVc-Township-Section: 44-25- 1 Site Address: E 5ULLIVANlN EUCLID/S KIFRNAN PARCEI,(S): (Frst 20) Applicanl Namc: r-J DULLANTY JR Phone # 624-5265 Applicant Adciress: W-K- DAVENFORT 8t TOOLE Phone 2#: 110 US BANK BLDG ua=.e Cl7fhjiISoF1i \11-,,led SPOKANE WA 94201 Floo.i Zonc: No Watet Saurce: Scwcr Source: School I)i,t: 361 Ctce Uist: l Phonc Dist: Billing Name: Owner: CROV1rN wE.ST REALTY LLC Engineer: 1-AV►'RENCE LE1NWEBER Address: nwnrr Address: 3808 N SULLtVAN RD BLDG N- Company: TAYLOR FNGINEERING LNC. 15 Acklress: 106 W MIS5ION S'1'E 206 SPOKANF, WA 99216 SPdKANE WA 99201 Phone: Uwner Phonc: 9241720 phonc: (5M) 328-337I Sigtecl Name: Fax: (.SW) 328-8224 Building/Planning Contact: FRIINCINE SHAW Planning Phone # 456-3675 Building Phane # 456-2205 DatC Subaliue.~d Description Initials DATE TECHNICALLY C4MPLETE TECHNICAL.LY Traffic Anatysis 1~/12/1996 DATE NOT 'IECHNICALLY C.OMPI.ETE COMPLETE (NO) ~imd DATE PAY FEES RECEIVFD DATE PRIORITY FFES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINA1. PLAT FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTlCE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 b COMPLETED - OR NF.EDS TO BE SIGNE[7 tn-Out +/1 hti-Out A'2 (n-OW ,f3 DESIGN DEVIATION DA'I'ES AV-4UT in-0uc A4 lu-Qw k5 lit-0ut 06 BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE tTEM CALCULA'TED DATE BOND RECENED BOND AMOi_1NT RECEIYED DATE B()N[) RELCASE - DATE Ij()NU REDtICL-i) I3()NI) RALANCE Ilearing Datr Appcovtd Dtnicd Continuecl Appealcd BCC BCC Decision Appmved BCC Decision DtnW S'T:lMPFD MYLARS TO PERMIT TFCHNlC1AN (SYLISUZANNE) S"I'AMPID 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINSTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) , PLANNING REVIEW LOG DATE t)ESCRIN'fIOti PER50N RESP4NSIBLE \ . t , r . SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER In the Matter Concerning ZE-2-97; A Zone Reclassification ) from Community Business (B-2) and Industrial Park (I-1) ) NOTICE OF to Light Industrial (I-2) ) PUBLIC HEARING ) Applicant: F.J. Dullanty, Jr. ) TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of proposal, as listed on Spokane County Assessor's records. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON TIIE ABOVE- REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW: Hearing Date: April 16, 1997 Time: 1:30 p.m. Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spolcane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. ProPosAl: Zone Reclassification from Community Business (B-2) and Industrial Park (I-1) to Light Industrial (I-2). Applicant/Owner: Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole F.J. Dullanty, Jr. 1100 U.S. Banlc Building Spokane, WA. 99216 (509) 624-5265 Owner's Designated Contact: Taylor Engineering Frank Ide 106 W. Mission Spokane, WA. 99201 (509) 328-3371 Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road, approximately 1,600 feet south of Ti-ent Road in the SW '/4 of Section 1, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Wasliington. Zoning: Community Business (B-2) and Industrial Park (I-1). Comprehensive Plan: Industrial. Environmental Determination (SEPA): A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) has been issued. The Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency. The official comment period ends April 14, 1997. Related Permits Not Included in Aprlication: None. nivision of Building & Planning Staff Person: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner 509-456-3675 . . ~ • t t . ZE~2~97 : , ~ ~ YMPIC . {A E : . . • Y .)LY►~~~Gt~ ~ a S f . .~a~f.~": • ' `~J J IU • . . ` ? `S ~ ~ . J . ► 4 V a I I e y ~•r: :VQ t e y., -,4 ; n ~ :3 H i 9 h -wood 6 School . - • ` . , ~ . 3J ~ ; _ _ _ _ . _ • • n . ° • ..1 ' ~ ~ T ~ < G AST V►b r i s ~•1 tL : ' ' ►CDI , ~ :w av P•4:1'~6 N'JR T 151 i2 153 154 155 `EI%I57 158 I`,~ ~61 161 • _ _ l 'S7~ R T o i ( A ~;--r- ~~.ic..~..,~ . ~ . 1 . ~ ~ ~ .~v.~ • . " ' I - _`C`O~' M vi• ~ o Z • , . . ~ v / . I,If ilwo~v • i :j~ .:sa:~ " ' • i • . J LIILJ_._. 'rRE N T n E L 2041, V E C 0 X - - ip~ - - - _ ~ _ ` 5R~ ~ ~xx, N . ~ - ~ G~ - ~ ~ ~ \ ^ KIEANAIV A~~f ~ \ . . .k:... i \ `"1~ ~;5: : . \ r{~y•:. i~~ tiihv: ••?:•}:{•Y-. I ' i?:•r~.:• ~ \ -~.r?:..~._.. 4~•x,'~':-:i, Z. ,4`:.}1{':}•.;.. \ . .titi~.•,.. \ tii:%:?tiv.:};~:~ \ , ♦ _';•{rkl:,.~y.,~:;': ` / •~:-~.:~i'~':?::~i::•:ti:}' \ _ . tC"'~ ,3~;.""• t::•:;:::. '~>,;~>.z:r•-.. •<.ti: \ s: . ~y : . \ •11 ~y~f~. V:.~L1 • f ~ ~ I1VL) U S T~.I/-~.~ ~ - -~F-UC L I D AVE _ _ • - . _ \ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~UC.LtD AvE, ~ ~ \ ~ , ~ ~ »p p' . - PR0.IECT Ir~FORh1ATtQrr - '8' STREET .wLKA,r, c~ov++vr.sr xun. uc ' , j • , t M evc~~ GOLLPINDC , I I I ° vao~cr .crL ae.cres y aoaee •eeesf r.mar C lXISfNG 2WpCr B-t • ql ACLt$ ~~~1g~(xt5 ~ OFfICF 9 NOT~ ~ _~0~ ~~y. ~ ~'OStD 2G+r[i ti! F:oo Y0 ' 99 ROOtS 170005R b v~~ P00. 25' BaTS SEreaOcs PRONT TI:70 19.lLNArt IST I$ S14C-T1 • 05' I];' ~ , . . ~ ~ ~ sce ' o 1 ( '~I ~ u ~ y I I I ~ QCoR •5' 1 STOOT ~ [ Q I I ' g MAXPA-+ELOGCOVeQAGG At ACRWt 264,075 S1' 30251 ~ I ~ M U IMN Bta11NG F56If 7 5T07T / 4O ~~~f~ I~ ~ ~0~~ ' ~ • ; ~ y l ~ N. cass a woen ~ p s pKVC AS qt(XOpW P.Cq OCq yAPlCt npe I I I ~ ~ o~ SKi~►6G S!E 20~+NG COOC O+nP u 004 LIJOSC61'04- 193,866 SP. 700'.t ~ I I.I ~I _ r 1 511rvrN 70~ 5' nPE u anauu a SratC~ - ripe iu uwuu.u ~ P~q~;nC,Y, ~Oi 1I1,05~ppr.4 AS i!9 SCCt~ 14 pp7Tf0 ~ a o~ ~ r es ' ~//iiiii/, cA n 9°c~wE COU+R rovw eOCe l 510QaCt - SE ZOW1'. CdCC PAGA- 1-9611755 ` / -5.000 SP I j t t9N8d - [x15rrf 9TA SiOP ON 9 SisCCi ~ 1 r -~~f ~ QQm R~u ~ ~ I I U U F+~p :0' BGT$ [zTEAi04lbRf4- 5lt2trKC00CGaA444 631380 1 . ~ ~ I ~ ooa PRO.ECT . V- _J laclPsite ~ IR ~ ~ g; n C STREET o0 ' 1 ;i01 c,%' nl ::u . W " I ~ ~N ~ ~~iii~~ii. II~'I •s k '7 .H 1 ~ I 1 / ~ V J ~ ►ocAnow ru 0 ] I I ~ o J{ . ; ~ ~ Q> > I Q I j~ ~ I / 7 a~,. B Z' a ~ no.ooo sP ° :.a et., s U I I ~ ~ °Q PRELIti11NARY SITE PLAN 0 } 6 ° m p ' ° ' scaLe- r • sa an L v loa a . ~ I I yp, i~sroretc~.aes~eat_ n G• ~ ~iiiiiiii ~ r ~ p ~ I I'~ r o ~ r o'ee F~ao'~~ ~t sIrc ' ~ o Zm I (~i ~ d ~ % a ~ co m m ~ a o c c ~ ~ ~ v Z e.wAcpn ~ ~ I I - ----f ~ CROWN WEST f ~ 'o' STREET REnITY,LLC ~ 9 I . SITE PIAN ° OF RECORp 7 / . , ' . . . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Spokane Business and Industrial Park Zone Change to I-2 SPOKANE ENVIRONfMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) RECEIVED SPQKANE COUN1T'( DIVSS1ON mn aY.. 1 ( 1 SPOKANE ENVIItONNIENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) ENVIItONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: File No. ;Z0boq? T'he State Enviroamental Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before makinb decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you anci the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be cione) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental cbecklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to deternune whether the environmental irnpacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise informatioa known, or give ttie best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the besc of your krnowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plaas widiout the need to hire experts. If you really cio not know che answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply. " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional informatioa that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency ro which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provicie additional information reasonably related to determining if there cnay be sigaificant adverse impact. Use of cliecklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even tliough questions may be answered "cioes not apply. " IN ADDiTION, complete die SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject proposals, the references in the checklist to the words "project, ""applieant" and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name uf proposed project, if applicable: Spokane Business and Industrial Park Rezone Page 1 i t SPOKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC l 97-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 2. Name of Applicant: Crown West Realty, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: c/o F.J. Dullancy, Jr. Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole 1100 US Baiilc Building Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 624-5265 4. Date checklist prepared: October 9, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: a Spokane County Planning Department 6. Proposed- timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Beginning in 1997, future phases to follow. 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, erplain. Construction, in the future, will consist of buildings on site. A binciing site plan will be - finalized in conjunction with construction. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, eYplain. Crown West Realty, LLC owns Spokane Industrial Park, wluch consists of approximately 580 acres. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ,SEPA Checklist and associated craffic study prepared for the previou Zhn ge Are ' aary Uinding site plan. (ZE-41-94, BSP-39-95). ~ ~ b a ova s o o ~ 9. Do you kno~v whether apPlications are pen i g ~e b ~ nmen~~fl ~ proP osals directly affecting the property cooereci by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval of zone change, various construction permits and ap rovals of utility and site plans. fia ' p~ ; _ A ' ~~ftr t i SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. ,,Cf OGt4ftt,0 Rezone 21.7 acres near tlie main entry of Spolcane Industrial Park from I-1 and B-2 to I-2.~ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufFcient information to a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur ooer a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duPlicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. Proposed location will be at and adjacent to and south of 3808 North Sullivan Road, Bldg. N-15. See attached vicinity map and site plan. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundacies). Proposal is wittvn the ASA and general sewer service area. 1~IPV'7~ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRON1YfENTAL ELEMENTS . 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): &rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1 - 3 % slope c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. GgA - Gamson gravelly loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No Page 3 . , r , SPOKANE ENVTRONiYfENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any Flling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading for parking drainage anci utilities will be performed. No filling is anticipated. Quantities are not known at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or LLse? If so, generally describe. Minor water and wind erosion during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? . Approximately 75 % - , ( D/i f ~ h. ProPosed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impa s t~e i~Cr~h, if any: Watering during construction to keep dust ciown. Lanciscaping all unpaved areas to eliminate potential water erosion. 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Eachaust from equipment and dust ciuring construction. Vehic la ex aust after co "01/nr/~ r - ~ ' ~ b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect our osal? If so, y p p ~f1~C/,~~~ generally describe. CC~ ' Vehicular exhaust from adjacent arterials and industrial development. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering during construction to keep dust down, landscaping after construction to control wind erosion. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year round streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it t7ows into. No Page 4 r • SPOKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plarLS. No (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year fiood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No - (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? Tf so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Drainage will be detained in 208 ponds, which will overflow into drywells, per County Stormwater Guidelines. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the num6er of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. ~ ~ None - 7 Q , ~r Qle, .(3) Describe any systems, othe than those designed for the disposal i ary wa/ installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to 6e disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). Drainage as per 3b(1) above, meeting Spokane County 208 requiremeucs. Page 5 r SPOKANE ENVTRONi1ENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? Any storage of chemicals will be stores as per Federal, Scate ancl local guidelines. (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site wilt not be allowed to percolate to ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? Any inadvertent spillage will be cleaned up in a maraner consistent with Federal, State and local guidelines. c. tiVater Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water tlow into other waters? If so, describe. Storniwater will be collected and disposed of by "208" swales and natural drainages. (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water? fcw- ~ 'C.f' •l ''iql~ ~y material shall be stored as Per DePartment of BuildinS and SafetY and as Per ~ standards in tlie ASA overlay zone. (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated A0A&Ie . a d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aauifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 313(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checlclist). Treacment of runoff via grass percolation areas as per Spokane County "208" requiremeuts. 4. PLANTS a. Checlc or circle type of vegetation found on the site: ~ deciduous tree: alder, maple~,spen other. ~ evergreen tree: eclar pine other. ~ shrubs. Page 6 . . ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) grass. pasture. crop or brain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees, shrubs & grass c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Noue known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Provide landscape buffers ornamencal landscaping as per Spokane County Zoning Code. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: awk, eron, eagle, songbir. , Cher , mammals: deer, bear, elk, beave other .)mall Rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildtife, if any: Landscaping to attract sonbbirds Page 7 . . ~ . SPOKANE ENVIRONNIENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the compieted project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Gas & electricity is expected to be used for all manufacturing and commercial energy uses. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or contro) energy impacts, if any: Buildings will meet all applicable energy code requirements. 7. ENVIItONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Any health hazards will be hanclled as per Federal, State and local healcti requirements. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None known at this time. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Any healch hazards will be hanclled as per Fecleral, State and local health requirenients. b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other? . ~ ~ Traffic from adjacent streets and noise from equipment of adjacent manufacturing C L ! (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project J on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, CVC.6 operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: Wtien construction occurs. Lonb term: Vehicular, manufacturing and other noises associated with commercial and light industrial uses during standard working hours. Page 8 . , r . SPOKANE ENVIRONti1ENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to daylight hours. Use of landscape buffers and screens to reduce noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE qQ- o cd CC` ~I a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ~ Industrial and vacant land ~b b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There exists che main office, a small entry security building, small storage builciing and small industrial/manufacturing building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? Not known at this time. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? I-1 and B-2. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify: No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not known at this time j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None Page 9 i SPOKANE ENYTROIYNIENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NJA 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project~'d land b~z uses and plans, if any: j~~ ~ j„ ~ . ti:O~~~- ; ~ lq~ ~ The proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive e and compatible w~th existing 1 and projected land uses. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Structures will not exceecl height limitations established in the proposed zone. Exterior building materials are expected to be concrete, wood and/or metal. .7 ~ v /,Il ~ % ~t,l_ , b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ~ Views to existing industrial uses. 3 ~ c. Froposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ~ Landscaping and buffering of proPc~sed uses. -(~l ~1~ f~f ~u~~ ~ v~~ 11. LIGHT AND GLARE . a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly ~P occur? • ~ ~a~~ Lights from vehicles, builciings and parking areas. Jmw ~ h~ ~6 SPOKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 1 I .10230(1) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affert your proposal? Lighting from vehicles and adjacent industrial uses. d. Proposed mea.sures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use landscaping buffers and screens to control light and glare. 12. RECREATION ~ A . ~r a. What designated and informal recreational oPportunities are in the immediate vicini ? ~ Sullivan Park at the Spokane River and Sullivan Road. Walking, biking, running, jogging can be done in che vicinity. b. Woutd the proposed project displace any eadsting recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTOR.IC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Nvne c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site pians, if any. Sullivan Road. See site plan. Page 11 SPOKANE CNYCRONMENTAL OR.DINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? . / ~ The site is served by public transit. U' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the Project eliminate? Parkiag neecls are not known at this time. Parkigg wil adhere ro pokane Count zoaing requirements. ' " " LF~ ~~L/~C C.~1 . CG~ Il . CC l~' ~ d u~q . Will the p ro I,re uire any ~ new ro or s~ree.imProv~rff n o ef ng roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Iaterior circulation routes will be required via continuous parking lot. Improvements will be located near areas where access is required to existing roads. One new approach to Sullivan Road is proposed. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. See craffic study prepared for ZE-41-94 and the study prepared for this proposal. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Widenins Sullivan Rnad adjacent to the subject property. 15. PUBI,IC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: Fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire and Police protection will be required. b. Proposed measures ta reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Provicie hre hydrants, sprinkler systems and adequate fire vehicle access. 16. UTILITIES a. Cirgle utilities curreQ available at the site electriciti_atural gaswater, refuse service,? telephon anitary sewer, eptic system, other. Page 12 , SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site 'or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity and gas from WWP, water from Spokane Inciustrial Park Water District and public sewer. ~ C. SIGNA''URE ezX4 I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the aQencv_ may withdraw any deterrnination of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date: .57/I0v 91~ Proponent: Richard D. Rollnick, President Address: Crown West Realty, LLC. (Please print or type) 3808 N. Sullivaa Road, Bldg N-15 Spokane, WA 99216 Phone: (509) 924-1720 Person completing form: Frank R. Ide, Taylor EngineerinQ Date: October 9, 1996 Phone: (509) 328-3371 Page 13 . , A SPOKaNE ENVLROtYNTENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Review Checklist: +oer Based on th is staff review of the environmental checklist anent information, the staff: .11 A. \ Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a deterniination of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated detennirution of nonsignificance witli conditions. C. Concludes tliat there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. FILING FEE - $75.00 Page 14 ~ J • , I County Public orks, D • • County • ' e • Memo To: Mike Dempsey, Spokane County Hearing Examiner Frcm: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor a&~ CC: ZE 2-97, FJ Dullanty Jr. Date: April 15, 1997 Re: Request to add 2 additional conditions of approval for ZE 2-97 13. Applicant shali dedicate 7 feet on Sullivan Road for right of way purposes along the frontage of the development. 14. The applicant shall enter into a"Developer Agreement" to provide fees for pedestrian signalization and movement of existing standards for the existing signals at Sullivan Road and Kieman Avenue/6 street. Said agreement shall include timing of construction by the applicant of all roadway infra-structure specified herein and fees not to exceed $40,000 for the aforementioned pedestrian signalization and movement of existing signal standards. 0 Page 1 ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & RoadsGor \7\ DATE: April 7, 1997 PROJECT: I-1 & B-2 TO I-2 CROWN BUSINESS PK FILE ZE-002-97 / (DRZE-246-97) Hearing: 04/16/1997 @ 9:00 #1 Review Date: 12/13/1996 @ # Sponsor/Applicant: FJ DULLANTY JR Section Township Range: 01-25-44 Planner: FRANCINE SHAW Design/Review Date: (01/09/1997 @ 1;30 - Canceled) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 5. The County Engineer has designated a 6 Lane Principal Roadway Section for the improvement of Sullivan Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. , CC: Applicant FJ DULLANTY JR Engineer/Surveyor LAV7RENCE LEINWEBER ~ ~ - Page 2 • 09/16/1997 01/09/1997 ZE-002-97 DRZE-246-97 6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 7. Access to Sullivan Road shall be limited to that as proposed in the Site Plan of Record until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. This approach may be limited to right- in/right-out based on traffic volume and the ability of drivers to make safe full movement turns at this location of Sullivan Road at some time in the future. 8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 12. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. - a ~ Klmball, Sandp From: Hemn7ings, Bi[I Sent: Thursday, March 27, 1997 7:21 ANi To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine Cc: Harper, Pat, Franz, Dean; Kirnballp Sandy; EngelFtard, 5cott Subject: ZE-2-97 FJ Dullan#y, .lr. ~ Importance: High I received the abave referenced project application on Nlarch 26, 1997. This proposal lies in an area of approved soils and we have na knov+riedge af any geolhazards an this prapeety. VC&'WMW4aP Page 1 / . . E HANSON ~ , HANSON INDUSTRIES,INC. 5~)°'~~'~S~e~"'~~~-~~'12A November 12, 1996 Pat Harper RECEIP ~y''~ Supervising Technician Spokane County Engineer's Office N 0 V 13 1996 1026 W Broadway SROKANF 1-'^!JNTY EC117,!;1;EE7; Spokane WA 99260-0170 RE: Pentzer Development Corporatiun - ZE - 41 - 94 Dear Pat: I have heard that che current owners of the property which was thc subject of the ahuve referenced rezoning action are proposing to develop a motel or hotel on a portion of the property. I understand that the traffic study performed to support the rezone did not address a use such as this which would potentially draw traffic north from I-90, hut rather addressed the development of loc:alizeci convenience uses. We would oppose any granting of a building permit for such a faeility if in fact there has not been a traffic analysis to support it. This proposal was submitted long after our Sullivan Park Center approvals were granted and any such analysis would have necessarily included analysis of traffic at Sullivan and I-90 with at least Phase l c7f Sullivan Park Center presumed as background traffic. I will he attempting to gain some turther clariticatiun of the pruposed develupmeiit aild would appreciate your comment on this situation. Incidentally, I am also of the understanding that B-3 zoning is required for hotel/motel development and that B-2, which is my understanding ut' I the rezone granted here, does not permit such development. Please advise on that. Sincerelv, Hanson Industries. Inc. , ; ~ CDa;vid J. • lsen Real Estate Director SPOKANE ENVIRONMFNTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MDNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OI+' NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS" FILr NO(S): ZE-2-97 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Community BLisiness (B-2) and Industrial Parlc (I-1) to Light Industrial (I-2). PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: April 16, 1997 PROPONENT: Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole F.J. Dullanty, Jr. 1100 U.S. Bank Building Spokane, WA. 99216 (509) 624-5265 • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road, approximately 1,600 feet south of Trent Road in the SW '/4 of Section 1, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant aciverse impact on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not reauired under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on reguest. There is no comment period for this MDNS; pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (1). (x) This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this MDNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., April 14, 1997, if they are intended to alter the MDNS. . MITIGATING MEASURES: 1. The project sponsor (applicant) shall contribute a sum of $30,000 to WSDOT for the traffic impacts associated with the rezone and development of this property. This payment to WSDOT shall be due no sooner than 1 year and no later than 3 years from the date the rezone is approved by Spokane County. Payment to WSDOT within this • window shall be due within 30 days when requested by WSDOT in writing to the project sponsor andlor current property owner. In turn, WSDOT shall use these fiinds to design and construct improvements to the Sullivan Road and Trent (SR-290) Interchange. This mitigation agreement shall conform to the provisions of voluntary agreements as outlined in RCW 82.02. I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications and adjustments to the above described proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the,future. - l ~~f Date: ame: G✓~J / Signature: ~ * ~ k * * ~ * k * ~ ~ ~ * * ~ k * * * ~ * * k * * * * ~ k * * * ~ ~ * * * k k ~ * * ~ ~ ~ * ~ Responsible Official: JIM MANSON by Francine Shaw Position/Title: Senior Planner Phone: (509) 456-3675 Address: West 1026 Broadway, Spolcane, WA 99260 Comments regarding environmental concerns are welcome at the ~e)ring. Datc issucd: Signaturc: , MSTR; MDNS RI:V: 12190 , MDNS; File No. ZE-2-97 • ' Page 2 APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of BLiilding & Planning for assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal. A copy of the MDNS was mailed to: 1. WA. State Department of Ecology 2. Spolcane County Health District Sepa Review, Olympia, 98504 Attn: Steve Holderby 3. Spolcane County Utilities Dept. 4. Spokane County Dept. of Building & Attn: Jim Red Planning Attn: Jeff Forry 5. Spokane County Division of Engineering 6. Spokane County rire Protection Attn: Pat Harper District # 1 7. Spokane County Air Pollution 8. Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Control Authority Fair Attn: Wyn Birkenthal 9. Spokane County Stormwater Utility 10. Spokane County Boundary Review Board Attn: Steve Worley Attn: Susan Winchell 11. Spokane Regional Transportation 12. Spolcane Transit Authority Council Attn: Christine Fueston Attn: Glen Miles 13. WA State Dept. of Transportation 14. East Valley School District No. 361 Attn: Mark Rohwer 15. Spokane Industrial Parlc MSTR; MDNS REV: 12/90 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATIQN APPLICA~~Q 4- p SPOKANE CaUNYY rART r A. CrNERAL INrORMATION: VI910N dP ~UII~[~INCi ANd ~'l.ANNING NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: F• J. Dullanty, . MAILTNG ADDRESS: WitherspQon. Kel lev , Davennort,& Toole, 1100 US Bank Bldg. CITY: Snokane STA'I'E: WA Zip; 99201 PHONE: (509) 629-5265 (WOrk) (home) Ir APPLICANT YS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE VVRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION rOR APPLTCANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Crown West Realty LLC PHONE: 929-1720 MAILING ADDRESS: N 3808 Sullivan Road, Bldq N-15 CITY: Suokane STATE: WA ZIp; 99216 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE ARCA (acres or sq. ft) 21.7 Acres ± ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTi20LLED (acres or sq. ft.) _ 580 Acres ± ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL F54' f°°° 45o lCe,9'"9 1 ASSESSOR PARCCL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED See Attached. STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N 3808 Sullivan Road EXISTING ZONE CLASSiFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B-2 and I-1 (1995) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Office Building / Undeveloped PROPOSED ZONING 1-2 COMPItE-HENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Industrial SCHOOL DISTRICT East Valley FIRE DISTRICT __Fj) :al WATER PURVEYOR Spokane Industrial Park PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings Duplexes ( 1 MultiFamily ciwellings Manufacturecl homes O Business M Industrial Mixed Use O Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: BSp-39-95, ZE-41-99 B . LrCAL/70Nr RrCLASS1rICAT1ON INFOI2MATION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SE corner of Sullivan Road & Kiernan Ave. SECTION 1 TOWNSHiP 25 RANGE 99 NAME OF PUBL.IC ROAD(S) PIZOVIDING ACCESS: Sullivan Road WTllTH OF PROPERTY FRONTIIIG ON PUBLIC ROAD: Approx. '12201 0 . . qb ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAi. OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ()o YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS SiLUj,van Road is a urincipal arterial . LEGAL DESCRIPTTON OF PROPERTY FOR EACt-3 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. See attached E-XISTING ZONE(S) I-1 and B-2 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ I-2 FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED IIY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW. Same as above TF YOU DO NOT HOLD T1TLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _ WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAICE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? The zonina code permits B-3 uses in the I-2 zone. The new owners wish to construct industrial buildings in the area rurrent 1 v zoned I-1. I-2 zoninct permits a qreater array of uses and provides areater flexibility than either I-1, I-~ or B-2. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? None_ TYle adjacent .roberties area zoned I-3, which permits more intense industrial uses than the proposed I-2 zoning. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? The Comprehensive plan desiqnates this area Industrial, Surrounding zoning is I-3. The need for supportina amemities to serve the existina Industrial Park, The pY'nnoSPj »ses arP not sianifi.cantlv different than proposed in 1999 zone chanqe. WHA1' MEASURES DO YOJ PROPOSE TU MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? Provide landscane and development standards above current reauirements. Restrict access to Sullivan Road to two , 1 nrat.i nn~ . . „ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II TNIS SCCTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH tiVRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BC INCORPORATED TN TI-lE PROPOSAL IIEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. , FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRTCT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARI2ANGEMENTS UI*Vl (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTIQN PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: 1~~ • OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW , BECAUSE USE TS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUII.DING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D . TtEQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: S cFQD ~ft1 FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATU2FJT'ITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FTRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (I3AVE) (fIAVE NOT) BECN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: WATER DISTRICT ~ 9IGNA ftF1TITLE~-J DATE COUNTY ENGTNEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DR.AINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS:- , ' , SIGNATC~RE/ItITLE DATE COUNTY UTILYTICS A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENEItAL 2EQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (IIAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS --S-IP A. COMMENTS: , IGNATUREfTiTLE 6TE HE'ALTH DISTRICT A PItELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA g ANIZGE -RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NO BEEN SATISFIED. ti. C('.3hiiviENT'S: C~a►.,`~-ed (~~s~rt'a~ ~o.~Lc--1 U~-~~ S a-r")j . , SIGNATUREfI'ITLE DA'rT'E SEWER PURVTY012 A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: -c--,0-pN-cxJ • A Jc, t 41~ r. ~ SIGNATURFJTITLE 15ATE . , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ~.E 9? R~E ONING SED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION ~~~I.,. MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAI. DESCRIPTION. . ~~9 N_ DATE: 6 ~ _zz/ • `-'~n; p ~ r;~ a,~► ~ .$S: CAJ ~ I O C~ ~ S ~ J a~ PHONE: ^ `~~'~S,,,~.E~~•- ~ ~ t LAM~ ZIP: ~ q ZO ~ ~ EAi ~ . . . . ~ PAR1r' IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ! FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FDIZ THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS 4N HIS/HER T3i:HALF. NAME: CROi,TN WEST REALTY , L. L. C. DpTE; 11 / 0 S/ 9 6 ADDRESS: _3808 N. SUL.T.TVAN ROAD BLDG N-15 PHONE: (509) 924-1720 SPOKANE, WA 99216-1670 ZIp; , NOVEMBER 5. 1996 SIGNATUkE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE,K DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED nEFORE ME ON THIS "ab DAY OF CI~~Vamh(I ( , 1996, BY NCh (d il pi(til(1tc'r NOTliRY SEA,'.. mnc I C (I I 1 Ul e) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residingat: Cllll i U(1(1 S 0000Q 1,,,f A I My appointment expires: St - 1- q~ . PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING) ~ DATE SUBMITTED: 1VOU C16 FILE DATE ACCEPTED: I~I `D BY: TOTAL FEES:.,~! RECEIPT . _ . ~ / ~~r►~- i ►~r I t ; ~ ~ n c~ ~~n-~ f /G/1 i ~ l + .r Spokane Business and Industrial Park Zone Change from I-1 and B-2 to I-2 Legal Description That portion of the S. W.'/a of Section 1, T.25N., R.44E., W. M. , Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of S.W.'/4 of said Section 1, thence S.00035'56"E., along the West line of said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence S.89049'36"E., 522.25 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continue S.89049'36"E., 303.75 feet; thence S.00103' 31 "W. , 1219.89 feet; thence N. 89°49' 36"W. , 518.00 feet; thence N.00003'31"E., 210.00 feet; thence S.89049'36"E., 314.25 feet; thence N.00003'31"E:, 729.89 feet; thence N.89049'36"W., 100.00 feet; thence N.00003'31"E., 280.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Together With: That portion of the S. W.'/a of Section 1, T.25N., R.44E., W. M. , Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of S.W.'/a of said Section 1, thence S.00135'56"E., along the West line of said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence S.89149'36"E., 50.00 feet, to the East right of way line of Sullivan Road and the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continue S.89149'36"E., 472.25 feet; thence S.00003'31 "W., 280.00 feet; thence S.89049'36"E.1 100.00 feet; thence S.00103'31"W., 729.89 feet; thence N.89049'36"W., 314.25 feet; thence S.00003'31 "W., 210.00 feet; thence N.89°49'36"W., 244.00 feet, to the East right of way line of Sullivan Road; thence N.00135'56"W., along said right of way line, 1220.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. r* k . r`.~ Cg L. LEr~~ . ~ ; S~Q~t'i o~ W A$~,,`•~~C`~ ` . - - ~ , ; . ' On teTe 96-00511/zone-ch.wrd s~~ ~p~105 , v ! , . ~ acP~s RECEIVED ~-~SPOKANE C;OUNTY !*1; 1996 DlVISION bP 6uILDlNa ANO w&qNNING BY. ~ r A ~ • •'"'~t► i ~~'f1 ' ~~J!! II L , ' V. "~•t~ 4J3's~ \ 5 p C~ K A N E t~_- ---:1~' a,►~~'~;..:L:< « LI N 7- l' D[PART:viEVT OF Bl'lLDING AtiD PL4\NING • A DIvi-51ON OF THE PUBUC WORfCS DEPARTME:`'T JANiL•5 L. \-1ANSO`. (7.T3.C). C31FFCTOR [)FtNIS N1 Sc'OTT P F.. D1r.Fc-ror. KECEIVED tiIEMUltaNDUlvi JAry 4 '1~91 ~ E1ti~e~ TO: Pat Harpcr, Spol:alle COL1IlIy Division ot'Engineer1112 ~ .1iiTi Red. S,,okane Countv Division of i itilitiNs Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Steve Worle`•, Stormwater Utilitv Gree Figg. Department of Transpurtation Susan W'inchell. Boundary R<view Boarci Cunnie Brady, Spokane Transit Authoricy East Valley School District No. 354 Fire District No. 1 Spokane Indtistrial Park Water District , FROiNI: Francine Shaw. Planner II ' DATE: .lanuarv 1-7. 1997 RE: Propos«i rc:vised plzills tOI" illc' Z.une Reclas5ificatiun. ZL-2-97; trum Community Business (B-?) and lndustrial Park (1-1) to Light Industrial (I-?) Enclosc:d tind copies ol tllt r<vised sitc plan tior the abuve referenreci zone reclassitication. Design changes have been made to the zone reclassiFeation site Jtvelopment plan submitted tu your oftice on December 3, 1996.• Please replace the original plan with the revised capy atld for-ward any comments by thc: Januarv 31, 1997 date. If vou have anv questiuns. you may contact me at 456-2205. c: E`.J. Dullanri-. Jr.. 'Xitherspuon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, 1100 US Bank Bldg., Spokane. WA. 99201 C'rown West Realtv, L.L.C.. 3508 N. Sullivan Road, Building N-1 5. Spukane, WA. 99?O1 Frznk Ide. Taylur Engineering. 106 W. Ntission Avenue. Spokane. WA. 991-01 i;)_o titi'EST BROALMA: AVENl;E •-SI'OKANE, tiVASHlNG7Uti 99_200 Bl'[LDING PNOtE. (509) 456-3675• FAx; (509) 456-4703 P(.:~N\tNi.; P.:ONE. (;(lq) .1_,;,_„~l; • F,vX (!;0G) 456-?24 .1 ;~.,r , ~ • • . ' County Public Works, 1 o • County • ee • Memo Ta Francine Shaw, Planner, Division of Building and Planning From: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor(&4A CC: Spokane Industrial Park Traffic Analysis Date: December 12, 1996 Re: Application not Technically Complete Spokane County Engineering is requesting that this applications' 28 day review for Technical Completeness by held in abeyance until such time as a traffic study has been resubmitted and reviewed by Spokane County Engineering and input from this study can be used in the conditions of approval that you requested. Thank-you for your oonsideration. 1 0 Page 1 • • • County Public Works, 1 o • County • • Memo To: Francine Shaw, Planner, Division of Building and Pianning From: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor 01,~~. CC: Spokane Industrial Park Change of Conditions fi!e Datw. January 2, 1997 Re: Appfication now Technically Complete RepresentaUves of the Spokane Industrial Park change of conditions have resubmitted a traffic anaiysis which has been reviewed and accepted by Spokane County Engineering. This memo serves to request that a previous memo dated December 12'hhas been fulfilled by the applicant and that the request for suspension of the applicabon be rescinded. I • Page 1 - - , MEMORANDUM ~ DATE: January 2, 1997 ~ I TO: Pat Harper CC: Mark Rohwer, WSDOT FROM: Steve Stai - Spmk~f &Wff SUBJECT: Supplemental information for SIP re-zone traffic study I have reviewed the revised material submitted to update the1994 traffic impact analysis for the Spokane Industrial Park re-zone to I-2. This material appears to be complete and accurate. The only discrepancy noted was between the 7500 ft2 office area shown on the site plan and the 22,500 ft2 in the trip generation tables. However, since the larger area would generate more trips than that shown on the site plan, the difference does not affect the results reported in the supplement. , PAGE 1 • 0 09:14:37 09 JAN 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 04597 SULLIVAN RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO BALL DR U 19 GRAVEL 20 SULLIVAN RD 00.150 BALL DR (END) U 19 GRAVEL 32 00.430 BELLE TERRE AV (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 24 00.750 36TH AV (END) U 17 PAVED 20 01.000 32ND AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20 01.240 SALTESE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 20 01.340 27TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20 01.390 26TH CT U 14 PAVED 20 01.500 24TH AV U 14 PAVED 20 01.590 23RD AVE U 14 PAVED 20 01.650 22ND AVE & CT U 14 PAVED 20 01.740 20TH AVE U 14 PAVED 20 01.950 16TH AVE U 14 PAVED 50 02.100 14TH AVE (END) U 14 PAVED 50 02.130 14TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 50 02.160 13TH AVE (END) U 14 PAVED 50 02.260 12TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 50 02.310 11TH AVE (START) U 14 PAVED 50 02.410 9 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 50 02.510 8TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 62 02.580 CENTURY COURT (END) U 14 PAVED 62 02.760 4TH AV U 14 PAVED 62 02.840 2 ND AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 62 03.010 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 44 03.140 MAIN AV (START) U 14 PAVED 44 03.260 VALLEYWAY AV U 14 PAVED 44 03.450 SPRINGFIELD AV (END) U 14 PAVED 44 03.520 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 64 03.680 MISSION AV (END) U 14 PAVED 84 03.880 I 90 OVERPASS U 14 PAVED 64 03 . 970 BR 4511 (N. BOUND) OV U 14 PAVED 64 04.000 FLOR.A PIT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 64 04.070 SIGNAL Q CENTR.AL PRE U 14 PAVED 80 04.440 BR 4510 (N. BOUND) O U 14 PAVED 80 04.880 EUCLID AV (START) U 14 PAVED 80 05.050 EUCLID AV (END) U 14 PAVED 80 05.390 KIERNAN AV (END) U 14 PAVED 80 05.500 BR 4502 OVER BNRR TR U 14 PAVED 58 05.610 SR 290 (TRENT) U 14 PAVED 58 05.910 UPLAND DR (END) U 14 PAVED 44 06.020 WELLESLEY AVE R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 SULLIVAN RD (END) 06.120 NORTH END OF ROAD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1 Records Processed AWA w A,,. , Taylor En gineermg, Inc. . Civil Design and Land Plarlning principals: - Perry M. Taylor, P.E. Stunley R. Stirdiitg Mark A. Aronson, P.E. , Duvid C. Lcrrsen, P.E. Associates: RECEIVED Scon M. Betsch, P.E. December 10, 1996 SPOKANE CQUNl"Y Frank R. Icle, ,asc,a DEC ~ p 1996 . Chief Financial Officer: 1 Edwin G. Wagnild Mr. Pat Harper D1vOON OF BUfLDtNG aND PLVyHt~ Sgokane County Engineers BY West 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington, 99260 RE: Spokane Business and Industrial Park 21-acre Rezone to I-2 Dear Pat: Encloseri please find our estimated trip generation for the revised site plan associated with the propflsed rezone. You will note that the total number of peak hour trips is substantially less than that of the approved site plan submitted with the 1994 zone change. Whereas the 1994 traffic study did not recommend any off-site mitigation improvements, this site plan also does not necessitate off-site mitigation. We trust this information will prove helpful as you review the project. Please call if you have any questions. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss this issue further. Sincerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. , - . Frank R. Ide, ASLA I.andscape Architect • cc: Francine Shaw, Co. Div. Bldg. & Planning Mark Rohwer, W.S.D.O.T. Richard Rollnick, Crown West Realty Dave Lindquist, Lindquist Architects . Rick Dullanty, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Taole 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 ' \ • r ti ~ ~ S 1~ O K A N E ,a ' C O U N T Y DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ]AMES L. MANSON, C.f3.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR RECEIVED DEC ;3 3 1996 MEMORANDUM Couaq► E~ineeri~g TO: Jim Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities Steve Halderby, Spokane County Nealth District Steve Worley, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Connie Brady, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board East Valley School District~No. 354 Fire District No. 1 - Spokane Industrial Park Water District rROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planneiq AATE: December 3, 1996 _ RE: Zone Reclassification for Spokane Business and Industrial Park; (Ref.: ZE-41-94 and BSP-39-95) There will be no design review scheduled for this zone reclassification request. Please review the above appl ication and forward your review comments to Francine Shaw no later than Friday, December 13, 1996. A traffic study has been requested and will be circulated accordingly upon submittal to the Division of Building & Planning. The review comments will be given to the sponsor and included in the Division of Building and Planning file. A new file number will be assigned to the project at the Notice of Application stage. Thanlcs for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Francine Shaw of the Division of Building anci Planning at 456-2205. c: F.J. Dullanty, Jr., Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, 1100 US Bank Bldg, Spokane, WA. 99201 Crown West Realty, LLC, 3808 N. Sullivan Road, Building N-15, Spokane, WA. 99201 Frank Ide, Taylor Engineering, 106 W. Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99201 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 ' ButLOtNG PMOtvE: (509) 456-3675 • Fnx: (509) 456-4703 PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Z4NE RECLASSII'ICATI4N APPLICA~L-Wip SPOKANE COUNN PART I . A. CrNERAL INFORMATI4N: VIgIpN Op S1111~bINC~ ANb pl~ANNING NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: F• J. Dul lanty, ~K . MAILING ADDRESS: Withersmor.__Uel3ey1 Davenport, & Toole, 1100 US Bank Bldg. CITY: SAOkane STATE: WA Zip; 99201 PHONE: (509) 629-5265 (WOrk) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NUT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN 4WNCR AUTHORIZATION rOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Crolm West Realty LLC PHONE: 924-1720 MAILING ADDRESS: N 3808 Sullivan Road, Bldq N-15 CITY: Snokane STATE: wA ZTp: 99216 PROJECTIPROPOSAI. S1TE AREA (acres or sq. ft ) 21.7 Acres ± AD7ACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) _ 580 Acres ± n~ n~na 45p 1 ~ ~ ga9 I ASSESSOR PA~tCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL nI&ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED See Attached. STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N 3808 Sullivan Road EXISTING ZONE CLASSTFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B-2 and I-1 (1995) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Office Building / Undeveloped PROPOSED ZONING I-2 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Industrial SCHOOL DISTRICT East Va llev FIRE DISTRICT __Ep #1 WATER PURVEYOR Spokane Industrial Park PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes Business Industrial Mixed Use Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DCPARTMENT ACTIONS INV4LVING THIS PROPCRTY: BSp-39-95, ZE-91-99 ' B. I,1;CAI,/ZnNE Ri;C.LASSIT'ICATION INrnRMATI(JN: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SE corner of Sullivan Road & Kiernan Ave. SECTIUN 1 TOVVNSHTP 25 RANGE 49 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Sullivan Road WTDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUI3I.IC ROAD: _ApArox. 1220' t . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ()0 YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Sui li van Road is a princioal arterial. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. See attached EXISTING ZONE(S) I-1 and B-2 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ I-2 FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW. Same ;~s above IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE ARLA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? The zoninq code permits B-3 uses in the I-2 zone. The new owners wish to construct industrial buildings in the area currPntlv zoned I-1. I-2 zoninq Dermits a qreater array of uses and Arovides qreater flexibility than either I-1, I-~ or B-2. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT , PROPERTIES? No13p-. The ad iaco ent propgrties area zoned I-31 which permits more intense industrial uses than the proposed I-2 zoning. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? The Comprehensive plan desiqnates this area Industrial# Surrounding zoning is I-3,, The need for supportinq amemities to serve the existing Industrial Park, The _prnnnsPrj us . a P no s'gIli fi cantlv different than proposed in 1999 zone chanqe. VJHA7' MEASJRES DO YOU PROPOSF_ TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? Provide landscape and development standards above current reauirements. Restrict access to Sullivan Road to two I nrat.inn.q. 1a • ~ , . . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATiON Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTYON OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDB THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH NVTtI'I'I'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFTED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A . THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS LhVOM (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: lap ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINTTIVE; AND WILL BE DETEItMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: SCFPD ljrf F1RE DISTRICT SIGNATURFlfITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVIE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: ~ i~~ /~rIGNA WATER DISTRICT ~ ftFlTITLEI-J DATE , COUNTY ENGYNEER A PREI.IMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENER.AL REQUTREMENTS FOIt ROADS A.ND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED W1TH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: t ~ SIGNAT E ITLE DATE COUNTY UTILITICS A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENER.AL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (FiAVE) (HAVE NOT) IIEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE 1S -5-kp A. CONf MENTS : Lxmd ~ -~-%A2 &lr-r -c--e- ci ie:c 14AP - IGNATURFfI'ITLE ATE HEALTH DISTRICT A PREI.IMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLA A_I~_L''iE RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROP4SAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT BEEN SATISFIED. A. COMiv;ENTS: Z! r~~ SIGNATURFfI'ITLE DA SCWER PURVEYOIt A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: _(.PoN-uj • ( r. L-e - \ SIGNATURE/I'ITLE ATE 1 ~ • . . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR VERTFICATION D, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION RE Z4NING MAP AND WRITTEN~LEGAL DESCRIPTIfJN. 40 S • . DATE: 4 ° •.y~~ • ; A SS: ~ t S ~a-,:._ PH4NE: LA ZIP. 9 9 ZO / - r}c f o~`st~ PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERTURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KN4WLEDGE. ! PURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AItEA PROPOSED FOIt THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTION5 ON HIS/HER B EHALF. NAME: CROWN iiEST REALTY, L. L. C. DqTE; 11 / 0 S/ 9 b ADDRESS: 1808 N. SULLIVAN ROAD BLDG N-15 PHONE: (509) 924-1720 SPOKANE, WA 99216-1670 ZIP: ~ NOVEMBER 5, 1996 SIGNATUf2E OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATNEI DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: C4UNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED IiEFORE ME ON THIS `tib DAY OF (1o V4tYlhti ( , 1996, BY IN(110(CI Il ?,c~il[1lCY NOTARY SEAL -M" v `c V~ Notary Public in and foc the State of Washington Residing at: C ll I 1 i l1 a fl aciTTi~Q (lfl Q t.( ~~.a My appointment expires: ~1- 4R , PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING) , DATE SUBMITTED: ~ FILE DATE ACCEPTED: BY: TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT . . i • ~ , . ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Spokane Business and Industrial Park Zone Change to I-2 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) . RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY DIY1910N OF Ayll-91NG ANn Pt-_ANNiN4~ a~: i • • . ♦ SPOKANE ENViRON1ViENTAL ORDIlVANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) ENV11tONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals witti prabable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. 'I'he purpose of this checklist is to provide information ro help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is requirecl. Inscructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmeatal agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EI5. Answer tbe questions briefly, widi the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question ac:curately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know che answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do noc know" or "does not apply. " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some quescions ask about goverrunental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, anci landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. 'Cbe checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provicie additional information reasonably related to decermiaing if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonpro}ect proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply. " IN ADDITION, complece the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject proposals, the referecices in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant" and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Spokane Business and Industrial Park Rezone Page 1 t SPOKANE ENYIRONNI.ENTAL ORDtNANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 2. Name of Applicant: Crown West Realty, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: c/o F.J. Dullanty, Jr. Witherspoon, Kelley. Davenport & Toole 1100 US Bank Building Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 624-5265 4. Date checklist prepared: October 9, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: Spokane County Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Beginning in 1997, future phases to follow. 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, exptain. Construcuon, in the future, will consist of buildings on site. A binding site plan will be finalized in conjunction with construction. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. Crown West Realty, LLC owns Spokane Industrial Park, which consists of approximately 580 acres. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA Checklist and associated traffic study prepared for the previous zone change and preliminary binding site plan. (ZE-41-94, BSP-39-95). 9. Do you know whether apptications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directfy affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval of zone change, various construction permits and approvals of utility and site plans. Page 2 . • . SPOKANE ENVZRONIVIENTAL OR.DINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Rezone 21.7 acres near the main entry of Spokane Industrial Park from I-1 and B-2 to I-2. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to understand the pre+cise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. Proposed location will be at and adjacent to and south of 3808 North Sullivan Road, Bldg. N-15. See attached vicinity map and site plan. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries). Proposal is within the ASA and general sewer service area. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL EL~EMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): &rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1 - 3 % slope c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, speciFy them and note any prime farmland. GgA - Gamson gravelly loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No Page 3 SPOKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10230(1) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approacimate quantities of any fifling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fitl. Grading for parlcing drainage and utilities will be performed. No filling is anticipated. Quantities are not known at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a cesult of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor water and wind erosion during construction. . • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75 % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Watering during construction to keep dust down. Landscaping all unpaved areas to elinlinate potential water erosion. 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exbaust from equipment anci dust during construction. Vehicular exhaust after conswction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vehicular exhaust from adjacent arterials and industrial development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering during construction to keep dust down, landscaping after construction to control wind erosion. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year round streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No ' Page 4 ' . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (2) Witl the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of f'i11 material. NiA (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approadmate quantities if known. No (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year tlood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? IF so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: (1) Witl ground water be withdrawn, or will watec be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Drainage will be detained in 208 ponds, which will overflow into drywells, per County Stormwater Guidelines. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or ather sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. None (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage From floor drains). Describe the type oF system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likety to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fre fighting activities). Drainage as per 3b(1) above, meeting Spokane County 208 requiremeacs. Page 5 . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDIlYANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? Any storage of chemicals will be stores as per Federal, State ancl local guidelines. (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? Any inadvenent spillage will be cleaned up in a manner consistent with Federal, State and local guideliues. c. Water Runoff (inctuding storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal iF any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water tlow into other waters? If so, describe. Storniwater will be collected and disposed of by 14 208" swales and natural draiaages. (2) WiU any chemicals be stored; handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water? Any material shall be stored as per Department of Building and Safety and as per standards in the ASA overlay zone. (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Noue is anticipated d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aauifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on exptanations reiating to facilities concerning Sections 3B(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). Treatment of runoff via grass percolation areas as per Spokane County "208" requirecnents. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: ~ deciduous tree: alder, maple, spen other. X evergreen tree: 6r, edar Cpne6D ~ shrubs. . Page 6 . ` . ~ SPOKANE ENVIERONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) grass. pasture. crap or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees, shrubs & grass c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Provide landscape buffers ornamental landscaping as per Spokane County Zoning Code. 5. ANI.NIALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: EDeron, eagle, songbir , other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver6Rther -)mall Rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Noae known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wi{dlife, if any: Landscaping to attract songbirds Page 7 . r • • SPOKANE ENVlRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (W AC l 9'7-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Gas & electricity is expected to be used for all manufacturing and commercial energy uses. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generalfy describe. No c. What kinds of energy coruervation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Buildings will meet all applicable energy code requirements. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - a. Are there any enviranmental heaith hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? !f so, describe. Any health hazards will be handled as per Federal, State and local health requiremencs. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None known at this time. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Any health hazards will be haiidled as per Federal, State and local health requirements. b. Noise: (1) VVhat types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traff c, equipment, operation, other? Traffic from adjacent saeets and noise from equipment of adjacent manufacturing. (2) 'VYhat types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, othei-)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: When construction occurs. Long term: Vehicular, manufacturing and other noises associated with commercial and light inciustrial uses during standard working hours. Page 8 SPOKANE ENVTROIYMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limiteci to daylight hours. Use of landscaPe buffers and screens to reduce noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial and vacant land b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures an the site. There exists the main office, a small entry security building, small storage building and small industriaUmanufacturing building. d. Will any struetures be demolished? If so, which? Not known at this time. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? I-1 and B-2. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation oF the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part oF the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify: No i. Approximately how many peopte would reside or work in the completed project? Not known at this time j. APproximately how many people would the completed project displace? None Page 9 SPOKANE ENVIROIYNfENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the praposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Tlle proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive zone and compatible with existing and projected land uses. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or !ow-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Structures will not exceed height limitations established in the proposeci zone. Exterior building materials are expected to be concrete, wood and/or metal. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views to existing industrial uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping and bufferiug of proposed uses. i l. LiGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lights from vehicles, buildinbs and parking areas. Page 10 , . , SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDi1VANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Lighting from vehicles and acijacent industrial uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use landscaping buffers and screens ro control light ancl glare. 12. RECREATION ' a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Sullivan Park at the Spokane River and Sullivan Road. Walking, biking, running, jogging can be done in the vicinity. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or nelct to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Sullivan Road. See site plan. Page 11 • • Y SPOKANE ENVIIZONNfENTAL ORDiNANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10230(1) b Is s►te currently served by public transit' 1f not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop9 The site is served by public tramit c How many parking spaces would the completed project have" How many would the praject eliminate9 Parking needs are not known dt chis time Parking will adhere to Spokane County zoning reqwrements d WiI1 the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not inctudtng driveways' If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) Intenor circulation routes will be required via continuous parlang lot Improvements will be located near areas where access is reqwred to existing roads One new approach to Sullivan Road is proposed e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oE) water, rail, or air transportation9 If so, generally describe No f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occuc See traffic study prepared for ZE-41-94 and the study prepared for this proposal g Proposed measures to reduce or control traruportation impacts, if any Wicierung Sullivan Road adjacent to the subject property 15 PUBLIC SERVICES a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example Fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)' If so, generally describe Fire and Police protection will be required b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on pub{ic services, if any Provide fire hydrants, Spnnkler systems and adegudte f re vehicle access 16 UTCLITIES a Cir utiiitties curre available at the site electncit atural gasvater, refuse service, . ' ~ telephon anitary sewer, eptic system, other Page 12 4 Y SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10230(1) b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the pro,Ject, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or m the immediate vicin,ty which might be needed Electncity and gas from WWP, water from Spokane Inclustnal Park Water Distnct and publlc, sewer ,i C SIGNATURE • vv I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the Aeencv may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist Date .57/I0v 914 Proponent• Richard D Rollmck, President Address Crown West Realty, LLC (Please print or type) 3808 N Sullivan Road, Bldg N-15 Spokane, WA 99216 Phone• (509) 924-1720 Person completing form Frank R Ide, Taylor Engineenng Date October 9, 1996 Phone. (509) 328-3371 Page 13 , . . ~ SPOKANE ENViRONMENTAL OR,DiNANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10230(1) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Review Checklist , Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent infarmation, the staff A Concludes that there are no probable sigmficant adverse unpacts and recommends a determination of nonsigruficance B Concludes that probable sigruficant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current propo5al and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions C Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of sigruficance FILING FEE - $75 00 Page 14 ~ . „ , a r ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIrICATION APPLICATION PART I s~ A. CENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE F. J. Dullanty, Jr. MAII.ING ADDRESS _Withers_roon. Kellev, Davennort, & Toole, 1100 US Bank Bldg. CITY Snokane STATE wA Zip 99201 PHONE (509) 624-5265 (WOrk) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME Crown West Realty LLC PHONE 929-1720 MAILING ADDRESS N 3808 Sullivan Road, Bldct N-15 CITY Spokane STATE WA ZIp 99216 PROJECTIPROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 21.7 Acres ± ADJACEN'T AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sg ft 580 Acres ± ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 01543.9090 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N 3808 Sullivan Road EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B-2 and I-1 (1995) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Office Building / Undeveloped PROPOSED ZONING I-2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Industrial SCHOOL DISTRICT East Valley FIRE DISTRICT FD #1 WATER PURVEYOR Spokane Industrial Park PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Single farruly dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes Business (X) Industrial Mixed Use Other ( ) - Describe LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVQLVING THIS PROPERTY BSp-39-95, ZE-41-94 , B. LEiGAI./ZONE RECLASSIT'ICATION INF()RMATION:, LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SE corner of Sullivan Road & Kiernan Ave. SECTION 1 TOVYNSHIP 25 RANGE 49 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Sullivan Road , WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD _~pprox. 2900' ► + Z ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVTDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRI'I'I'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT ' A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~ B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS 4MOOT) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW I~ ~ , OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE S CFPJ7 ~ftl &l-lL Cn►l-.- 'p f n'1 1 t ~ ~t ~~i ~ FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS ~ WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTITLE DATE COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DR.AINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS , 74~ SIGNAT~E/"1~ITLE DATE , COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAI REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS A COMMENTS 5IGNATURFJTITLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED a C4MNiEN'TS SIGNATUREII'ITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS SIGNATURElTITLE DATE _ • RECEIPT SUNIIKARY _ w ~ 1 t TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9602017 DATE• 11/05/96 APPLICANT• TAYI,OR ENGINEERING PHONEs ADDRES3. 106 W MISSION AVE 3POKANE WA 99201 CONTACT NAME: TAYLOR ENGINEERING PHONE- TRANSACTION: ZONING (ENGS), I.AND USE ACTION REVIEW DOCUMENT ZD : 1) 2) 3) 9) 5) 6) COMMNTB. PARCEL N0.01543.9090 FEE & PAYMENT SUNMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00 REZONE REVIEW 1 25.00 TOTAL DUE = 225.00 TOTAL PAID= 225.00 BAI.ANCE OWING= .00 PAYMLNT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 11/05/96 00011930 2897 225.00 PROCESSED BY WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA ****~~,t*~*******~********~*****~ THANK YOU •y tn 1'ERMIT CENTER PASSPORT ~ UatL Number W ~ ~ Namc te") Phonc Address Commcnts , CUSTOMEP. ROUTING Division of Builduig & Planning Drvision of Butlding & Planning / N, rti{ Vf~ M~~~.l'JJMIfM Vn s Addressing _ Admin Exception i Approach Permit : Building Permit ~ Artertal Rd Plan Info ~ Elood Plam PeRnit Code lnforniation [3inding Site Plan Info : Pubhc/Pnvate Roads Commercial Review Cert of ExempUon s Res Bidg Permit Rev Conference Comprehensive Plan ~ Site Drainage Info ~ Energy Code Info ~ Cond Use Permit , Subdrvision Review ~ Fire Safety Review ~ Nonconforming Use , Utility Permit Manufactured Home Permit Revie%% Zone Change Review : Mechanical Permits s Shorelines Info ~X[ 0 / ~~3 , Other Permits Short Plat Info NO FEE REQUIRED =Reviewer Time out s Plumbing Pcrniits ~ Subdivision Info kd~ I Pnvate Road Info Temp Use Permd /~MuTm 13ivhoYt Residential Reviexv Vanance Appl ~ APA Payment Sewer Permits Zone Checl. s Cert of Exemption information Zone Info = Subdivision Review ULID/Sewer Info Zone Change Review rY0 FEE REQU/RED i NO FEE REQUIRED Rcvuwer Timc. uut Rcvir,wer Time oui Reviewer Time out I I I I ni%tiiticuAtiA OkiCiK 2, it 13c, 1509924x"9 CROWN 11EST 391 P02 MAY 0? ' 97 12: l~' 85/85/1997 14:45 _-j3247663 COUNYY t ANING PAGF_ 82 . , s , Authaxfzation to Perform Soils Testing spo=es Ed710y~A- eAr,.A64c_AoPw1-, 1WC Project Natae: sur-i~u~v,~c~,v~,~,0 w~UE•c%c1~ ~a s~' ~a ~c~.e~ Spokane County ProjerE rto. 'Tbis authoruation between Spokanc Couricy and AOI Gt/ce.Sf .Q64G clno..ot~ a~mvrnr ar p~r~e~ ~whose interest in the project is t !~l~.t.~2 i,s Cntered int0 thiS ti.+. ~+.r, •p~ .o~) ~ 7+~Y day of 19.ZZ. This authoriZation to the project scnvwn as ,ado 40'~10 (hojaK Nmsc vr*a SA&W. or P~1eot eo.) Wherc,s individuafs and panics nuned hefein have an tnterrst in the above described propeny or pro}ect, authnriu Spokme County aM itx sgcnts to peti'orm the follawing : t•,Petforrtt otructural soU's ttsting work to dttetrzine the Subgtade Modulus siretlgtb of the soil, in accordance w*h AasHTo Teg Method z294 and u modified by the weshington State Dept. of 7Yansportation. Thc value's dextrmined from laboratory testing will be uscd by the Sponsor's Eagineet for sttuctural paYement dcsign. 3. Iteport the test re.sults to the Sp4nsor or the Sponsor's Fn&,eer. And it is unrdersLood that the Sportsot's Ergineer wiU be tesponsihle fQr rcduciag the data and petfotming the staristical analysis to deternune the dcsign value; and Ihat the individuals znd parties named heran as having an interest in the above descabcd ptoperty ar projsct agtee to the following: 1. Rcimbutsr Sp~ok:aac Couaty or its Umts fot perfottni.qg the strucusl eoi!'s tcsing work at cost plus 10°l.. 2. Any Hiilina amatLnt duc. iadudinZ snY cnpenses inturred ia the aolloctitoa of ai► an►etdus aecounf. musc be paid w►ithin 30 daYi of invoic•c dam and prW ta the County't a=ptanae of tLC prqjeat for filing ar lLnsl plat -toooc+diag. if s ptoject a proj~.t is apprv+rc,d anwot ttcorded with a balanoe still owsog, the unpai,d balance shall bt paid witbin 30 dso af iaYoi= dict- 3. Thc undwagued a,6iwj that thcse fces alsd reimbw'ubk c9aas" uc due payahlt upoa rcceipt nL billin8 as ap,eciAed zbove, a. wno► vnvozas mc Pafd wi~in 3o ds0vf ~e ~wa~ eaec ,~ili ~ ~d~a a~4uen~. If anr oua~ag balance an ths aceoamt af titis prose~d is ~rtbt psld u+lthiu 70 da~rs af mvace dat~e. nv fiuther ~ro~ic w~l be balaaa is pzid. ~ay balaace er thc acveunc ior ihis preject nvt paid witbin peatocmed uaul the enarc aneo~uat aaduns. iacludinC 65 di)►s af the iavvicz diLc nay ecsvlt in 1~I ution ot tLe utiitiatioa of ooUeCtivn P1 ~ Couahr ~ tdcrras ro a coLtection aSeacY• Tbc Spon~ot wiU ba li2blt for u~y u~d all expenses intvrrtd by► coiLwd= acf oYesdue acaounts. 5. TDo imoim ars eo bs seat wthe stisM108 af: Nam: CgONN iIEST RF.AI.TY , L. L. C. ~ . AddfCSS: 3808 NORTH SULLIYAN RO1lD BLDG w-15 _ City and Sutie' SPOKANE, WA Lip Code- _"216_16 Q Phone No. :(504 ) 924-1720 Date: 5/7l97 , pvthori~cation Signaturc: ~ , RoB s . cRAM s ~ - Name of SigOaTY = (P,a,. prid) Spokane Busi*ness&lndustr*al Park /1 -L C ( ' ' Y YHV~c~ YMPIC EaSt V o I I e y t ~ ' ~J r H i g h er L, • - ~ -wood . d School • r t - - - - - - - ; ~ a ST~N 9 ~ LL ~ ~ ` c w , . ~ JF 6 N1JRT Av 151 153 154 155 ~ 156 157 158 160 ~a a $ ~ R,T a c H _ ~ . "-xv ~ r 1 ! 167 ta6 IE W ~ ! MIAOY \ z I ~ _ - J'~; ~ ~ ~ _ ~~M~I~~~aiw M AVE o " ~.c•~ .a... ~ L~t~ _1 o A TR T sa EL 2041 -j ~n ' Vit- L 0 ~ eRI _ `%z~ - - ~ . ~ KiEaNaN &F \ L Ll ~ 1S { f : LY~ ~ ` ~ . . { tit SPOKA _N'E ~ ~ EJCLID AVE 17 - - - - ~ - - - - _ - ~ ~ E JCLID ~ AV E, ~ Q1, \ ♦ . \ . . .~~~~i~'~i ~ ~ " • , ~ . . ~ ~ . , , Memo To. Mike Dempsey, Spokane County Heanng Examiner From: Pat Harper, TransportaUan Engineenng Supervisor ~c~k CC: ZE 2-97, FJ Dullanty Jr Date: Apnl 15,1997 Re: Request to add 2 addibonal conditions of approval for ZE 2-97 13 Appficant shall dedicate 7 feet on Sullivan Road for nght of way purposes along the frontage of the development 14 The appl►cant shall enter mto a"Developer Agreemenr' to provide fees for pedestnan signalizabon and movement of exisbng standards for the existmg signals at SuIINan Roatl and Kleman Avenue/B street Said agreement shall mclude timing of construcGon by the applicant of all roadway infra-structure specified herein and fees not to exceed $40,000 for the aforemenbonetl pedestnan signalizabon and movement of existing signal standards ~ 4, ` ~ . • Memo To: Mike Dempsey, Spokane County Heanng Examiner r,::D From: Pat Harper, Transportabon Engineenng Supervisor CC. ZE 2-97, FJ Dullanty Jr Date: Apnl 15,1997 Re. Request to add 2 addibonal conditrons of approval for ZE 2-97 13 Applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on Sullivan Road for nght of way purposes along the frontage of the development 14 The applicant shall enter into a"Developer AgreemenY' to provide fees for pedestnan signalizabon and movement of existng standards for the existing signals at Sullwan Road and Kieman AvenuelB street Said agreement shall include Uming of construction by the applicant of all roadway infra-sUucture specified herein and fees not to exceed $40,000 for the aforemenUoned pedestnan signalization and movement of existing signal standards , ~ ~ • • ~ ~ ~ • , Memo To: Mike Dempsey, Spokane County Heanng Examiner From: Pat Harper, Transportabon Engineenng Supervisor CC: ZE 2-97, FJ Dullanty Jr Date: Apnl 15,1991 Re Request to add 2 addibonal condiGons of approval for ZE 2-97 13 Appl,cant shall dedicate 7 feet on Sullivan Road for nght of way purposes along the frontage of the development 14 The applicant shall enter mto a"Developer AgreemenY' to provide fees for pedestnan signalizabon and movement of existing standards for the exisUng signals at Sullivan Road and Kieman AvenuelB street Said agreement shall include Uming of construction by the applicant of ali roadway infra-structure specified herein and fees not to exceed $40,000 for the aforementioned pedestnan signaltzabon and movement of exisUng signal standards _ 97 w or En ~nee~rin , Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning pnncipals Perry M Taylor, PE ' Staitley R Strrlrng MarkA Aronson, PE David C Larsen, PE Associates December 19, 1996 sc°" M Burch, pE RECEIVED FraikR !de ASIA D E C 2 41996 Chief Fmxncial Offcer Edwrn G Wagrald SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIPIEER Mr. Pat Harper Spokane County Engineers West 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington, 99260 RE: Spokane Business and Industrial Park 21-acre Rezone to I-2 Dear Pat Enclosed please find our revised estimated tnp generation for the revised site plan associated with the proposed rezone. The numbers were re-analyzed based on more reasonable sizes for the convenience store and fast food restaurant As a result, the number of weekend tnps is more accurately represented. Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss Sincerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. lailgv- Frank R Ide, ASLA Landscape Architect cc: Francine Shaw, Co. Div. Bldg. & Planning Mark Rohwer, W.S.D.O T. Richard Rollnick, Crown West Realty Dave Lindquist, Lindquist Architects Rick Dullanty, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole 106 W Mission Ave • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 , Tay 1 or Erlgz.neerirzg ~ Irzc _ S I P' s PROPOSED REZ ONE Traffz,c Study Suppletnent TECHNICAL SUMMARY November, 1996 3TATEMENT of PURPOSE / PROJECT SCOPING The purpose of this traffic study supplement is to update trip generation estimates based on revisions to the site plan. ANALYTICAL PROCEDORES and METHODS The basic analytical approach followed the same standardized principals and procedures used for the original study. They are described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRANSPORTATION and LAND DEVELOPMENT (T&LD) as supplemented by the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) NA TIONAL COOPERA TIVE HIGXWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 187 (NCHRP 187), and ITE's TRIP GENERATION. COMPARISOMS of TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Exhibit 1 compares the trip generation estimates for the original rezone (as documented in the original traffic study) with the proposed revisions to the rezone; Attachment "TG" contains the actual output from ITE's 3'RIP GENERATION. As shown in Exhibit 1, the proposed revision generates about 55 percent EXHIBIT l: COMPARIONS of TRIP GENERATION E3TIMATES REZONE ORIGINAL REVISED BUILDOUT DR-WAY DR-WAY TOTALS VOLUME VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 25,614 11,486 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2,205 546 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 528 288 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 21734 835 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 892 360 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2,282 584 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 3,174 948 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 16,803 12,168 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 7,425 10,687 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION less trips on an average weekday. However, it generates a less than 70 percent less during the morning rush hour, and a little more than 70 percent less during the afternoon / evening rush hour. Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Traffi c St udy Suppl esmen t S. I. P. 's RFsYISU) ItFZCM 1 Nove.mrber, 1996 Whereas it generates about 28 percent less on Saturdays, it generates nearly 44 percent more on Sundays. The difference on Sundays is attributable to the use of specific land uses where applicable (e.g., "Convenience Stores", "Fast Food Restaurant", etc.) whereas the original traffic study used ITE's Land Use Code 320, "Shopping Centers". "Shoppinq Centers" have much lower Sunday rates than those of the specific commercial uses. As a result, it has been concluded the revised site plan (as developed by Lindquist Architects) substantially reduces the traffic impacts of the approved rezone, especially during the peak hours. Tayl or Ehqineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement S. I, P. 's REyISm RE7=9 2 November, 1996 YW H ~ ~ ;H ~H H~ .W . Hz za WH ~H ~a ~w Hx HW a H a H Tayl or Engiri~4E~! 3c i.ri g , Iric _ P_' s REV I SED REZ C:>NE TRMe TIOnq ESZ'IMATES INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the estimation of traffic generated by the proposed revisions. The trip generation estimates are based on trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERATION. Trip Generation Analysis GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 84 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 2 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 1 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 10 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 12 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 1 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 12 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 2 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 11 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 13 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 16 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 2 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 8 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 157 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 21 Tayl or Fhgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement / Attachment "T1G" S. I. P. 's R1sYIM) REZI,tiE 1 November, 1996 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL continued 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 3 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 19 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 22 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 20 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 2 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 23 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 3 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 00 1.00 21 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1..18 1.00 24 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 30 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 3 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 15 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 2 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 55,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 383 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 42 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 6 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 00 1.00 47 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1..16 1.00 54 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 50 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 6 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 56 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 8 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 00 1.00 51 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1..18 1.00 59 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 73 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 8 SUNDAY 2-WAY V4L .68 1.14 1.00 37 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 6 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl or Ehqineering, Inc. Traffi c Study Sqppl ement / At tachment "4tG" S. I. P. 's RavIm) REL(,tiE 2 November, 1996 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 45,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 314 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 7 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 41 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 39 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 44 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 41 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 5 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 45 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 7 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 42 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 49 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 59 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 6 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 31 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 5 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 110,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 767 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 84 ' 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 101 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 13 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 95 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 108 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 100 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 111 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 17 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 102 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 119 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 145 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 7 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 8 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 15 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 75 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 5 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 6 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 11 Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement / AttaGhment "7G" S. I. P. 's REVISE) RFZCM 3 November, 1996 HOTEL 89 OCC ROOMS AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 310 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 8.70 3.13 1.00 774 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .40 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .27 .00 1.00 24 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .67 .84 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .41 .00 1.00 37 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .35 .00 1.00 31 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .76 .89 1.00 68 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .36 .00 1.00 32 2nd HI AM PK EXIT .29 .00 1.00 26 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .65 .85 1.00 58 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .43 .00 1.00 39 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .33 .00 1.00 29 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .76 .90 1.00 68 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL .87 .94 1.00 77 SUMDAY 2-WAY VOL 8.48 3.42 1.00 755 PK HR TOTAL .75 .88 1.00 67 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL OFFICE 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 454 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.37 .00 1.00 53 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1.00 7 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 .00 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 00 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1..16 1.00 62 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 53 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 5 PK HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 4 PK HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 9 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 22 PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 3 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL OFFICE 14,400 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 291 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.37 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 38 Tayl or Ehqineerzng, Inc. Traffic Study SWplement / Attachment "TiG" S. I. P. 's iiE/Im) RElCYIQs' 4 November, 1996 ~ GENERAL OFFICE continued 14,400 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 .00 1.00 7 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 .00 1.00 33 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1.16 1.00 40 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .00 1.10 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .00 1.18 1.00 N/A SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 34 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 6 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 14 PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 2 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANT 51000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 832 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 177.87 78.63 1.00 889 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 7.55 .00 1.00 38 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7.26 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 14.81 9.81 1.00 74 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 7.24 .00 1.00 36 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 5.68 .00 1.00 28 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 12.92 11.35 1.00 65 AM GEN PK HR ENTER 10.72 .00 1.00 54 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 11.61 .00 1.00 58 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 22.33 15.59 1.00 112 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 14.13 .00 1.00 71 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 12.53 .00 1.00 63 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 26.66 29.46 1.00 133 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 229.34 119.45 1.00 1,147 PK HR ENTER 7.24 .00 1.00 36 PK HR EXIT 7.85 .00 1.00 39 PK HR TOTAL 15.09 6.52 1.00 75 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 209.46 130.24 1.00 11047 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL 12.16 .00 1.00 61 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl or Ehgineerznq, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement / Attachment "?iG" 5. I. P. 's JWISW AEZM 5 November, 1996 ti - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FASTFOOD NO DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 4,006 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ITE Code 833 AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 786.22 147.56 1.00 3,145 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 21.62 .00 1.00 86 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 16.31 .00 1.00 65 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 37.93 21.42 1.00 152 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 21.25 .00 1.00 85 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 18.84 .00 1.00 75 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 40.09 25.88 1.00 160 AM GEN PK HR ENTER 41.88 .00 1.00 168 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 34.26 .00 1.00 137 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 76.14 21.84 1.00 305 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 55.82 .00 1.00 223 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 51.52 00 1.00 206 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 107.34 111..81 1.00 429 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 822.89 326.51 1.00 3,292 PK HR ENTER 54.98 .00 1.00 220 PK HR EXIT 54.98 .00 1.00 220 PK HR TOTAL 109.95 55.42 1.00 440 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 693.25 366.55 1.00 2,773 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N[A PK HR TOTAL 127.11 51.70 1.00 5V8 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION CONVENIENCE MARKET AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 51000 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ITE Code 853 AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 845.60 163.67 1.00 4,228 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 113 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 22.62 00 1.00 113 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 45.23 18..52 1.00 226 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 156 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 31.29 00 1.00 156 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 62.57 36..32 1.00 313 2nd HI AM PK ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 113 2nd HI AM PK EXIT 22.62 .00 1.00 113 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL 45.23 18.52 1.00 226 2nd HI PM PK ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 156 2nd HI PM PK EXIT 31.29 .00 1.00 156 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL 62.57 36.32 1.00 313 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 11448.33 735.17 1.00 7,242 PK HR ENTER 28.90 .00 1.00 145 PK HR EXIT 26.68 .00 1.00 133 PK HR TOTAL 55.58 .00 1.00 278 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 11182.08 608.38 1.00 5,910 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Taylor EYigineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Stupplement / Attachment "?tG" S. I. P. 's REVISM REZM 6 November, 1996 . • MAY r 8 i997 `g~~ ~4~~~~Yt ~.~IGIN~ER / W TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC~ hLE~ER ~''~l W 106 Mission Ave Spokane, Washington 99201-2345 PH (509) 328-3371 DATE JOB NO ffOd FX (509) 328-8224 ATIir 4 A To ~t'D~i~✓~`' ~',~~l~Ty ~iU~2~~ xE 57,~~ y v~J I:Fmr' wr,vE=~v1N S ~ , NVE ARE SE.'DLNG YOU ~ ATTACHED L'NDER SEPARATE COVER VIA TI-IE FOLLONYL\G TTEMS SHOP DRAW'LNCS PRLV"TS PLA.\S A,YAI.YSIS COPY OF LE'ITER CHA,YGE ORDER DLSK SPECIFICATIO\S COp= . ~ X(4 7-11,04 O~t : ~~~W oZQAC IZA eW w/1)4- K1 ~ ~ ~/~c~i~✓~;C"~ 1)0007"q THESE ARE SUBNQTTED AS CHECItED BELOtiV FOR APPROVAL xAPPROVED AS SLB.NIITTED RESUBNIIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL FOR YOUR USE APPROVED AS NOTED SUBMT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTIO\ AS REQUFSCED RETURYED FOR CORRECTIOiNS RF.'TURV CORREC'IED PRL\TS FOR REVIEW AND CONLtifENT RE.lARKS AJ. . _ . .t/~ ~ COPY TO SIGVED v FORh1S/LOT XLSl022196 i J A► w TAYLOR ENGIlVEERING, INC. LFMERAOF"X'RA$5W~1~►.~.,,;}xr IW W 106 Misston Ave a ' , , 11 M1SN} ~ n ,,.N~.. 'n Spokane, Washington 99201-2345 PH (509) 328-3371 DATE JOB NO FX (509) 328-8224 U1 k1 AM, 'r'/I/11-2 To xE 1 u c.L ,J NYE ARE SE.NMLNG YOU ATTACHED UN`DER SEPARATE COVER VIA 'I'I-LE FOLI.OtiYLYG TTFaNIS . SHOP DRA«'L\GS PRLN-M PLA.\S ANALYSLS COPY OF LEI'TER CHANGE ORDER ~ I DLSI, SPECIFICATIONS . w Jf , hi~\rVP}~+~ M+V r t { ~~iJCM1J.4JtJ~,,\~; ' Y . , , fJ' f 1 rry~} / Co/.'~ c,1~1~ ~qi✓1~ ~~✓r ~/~L~G /~c.,.c,ry~2r Z,~ i ~Ol.~ .~'~ai~s' ~ Sr~i,Jc~ i 'IilESE ARE SU'BNaTI'ED AS CHEChED BELOtiti FOR APPROYAL APPROVED AS SUB~ffITED RESUIINITT COPIES FOR APPROYAL FOR YOUR USE APPROYED AS NOTED SUB`fIT COPIES FOR DLSTFtIDiYTION pS REQL'FSTED RETUR,YED FOR CORRECTIONS RMUM-4 CORRECTED PRENTS FOR REVIEW AN-D CONL1fErT ~NLkRKS T/YC 77e7 4) ~4/2J1-6- C" ;0"61~ E14 T'c' A~~ /Nl ri.q v COPY TO SIC\ED v U FORMS/LOT XL.S/022196 ~ • 1 _ . + \ ~ ~ ~ ~SF'li~ Q ~ ~ I~~ ~ l1~ e ~ ♦ J ~ ~i . 11 / f 1 ` ~.J `cr n • ~ = ; - J.. , ~ ~..:.r;.; - y- . ~ titi J1 ,-^r 600-. -tt ,I _ , ~y ~ , ravef ! ~ ; } ; '('~~1~ ~ ~ r _ ~i u "~f ~ ~ , ~ _ p~t 0 ~ ~ \ CII ~ ~ • 7 _ ~ • ~~b! 1 ~ t S ~ . t ~ , d ] „ / , u ~ , ~ A , ; ~ Cl•/ ~y \ ~ 4 , - ``1 ' ~ ~ ~/f i ~ A `~.1 ♦ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ r lCb ` r.~ i C,A ` • `wf _1 ~S C ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ -~''v ~ ^ • ~ ~ v j ~rt ~~~"1 `v1 _ -~4r y , ~ o ~ ` , s _ • w t • ` . , ~ ~ o ~ 35 ~ • ~ ~'~~J ~ `L v 1 o " ~ ev S J l ~ r _1. ~ ~ ~ p / ` ~ . c • • il ~ ~ tl M ~ o t~ L 11 ` ~ 1 o 0 if HiBVh Scht a Q6 a 73 . a M~„c ~ C • i ~ 'X) • ~ ~ o I ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ Y } ~ i~~ 1 ~ ~ ' •p ~ 1 0 ~ 4 • ~1 ' • l ~ 4~ ` ~ ~ • 1 ~ j+^~ ~ . i ~j ~ 1 I ~ Ayr ~ Q~'•t~• • 11 • ~ _,,rM~ ~ r.~, 4 ~a- ~ ~ J, ~a• • • • • ~ ~ u 11~V Y • • • --,c ` _'~i7J~ ~ f ~ ~ 1 ~i • •D •t~ ~t ° • + v ~r I O J ' • 1 ~ 1 i . ' + .r . ~ ~ ~ ` _ ,.~.i' t ~ ` " • '3 • ~ ! we115 ~ Q o ~ • ~t ~ '1 - ~ 4 ti elor ~ ~ ;l-.. • S~" ~ B M 2040 • i • ' ~ • • ~ t~t, o ~-t~~~~` : -.},~~j 4 .~4 , . ~ , ~R , • 1!'!~° ;o°c ~ 6 ~ ~~1 a T • . ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ a r_ F ~ t ~ ' ~ ~ :-aM 2023 - R6AD ~ ~ If ~ ' s~a Trentw ood 2--- P ~ i ~ 2016 ~,t1T 1 li t ~i^~ ~ >~✓i 1~ f ~ ~ ~ _ i ~ • ' ~ ~ • 1 Grav `i yYaterTank AI yy S~ 'f~ ~ ~ ~ wt y~~'lfi.~, ~ ool i~$~~~ • •t~`r lE.~,+~+o.IK1! 1 1::A'~"•~ ' - ~I EtJC o • j. ~ j) ~ t`,~5~1` Sub tauo~ - 'II5L1T~ ~ t + (1Oto . , 20016 BptfOw << ; ; z~ P~c ~ 1~ g„--:~~ SOffOw ~l-•'S 4. ~ ~ ' `-~7 ` ` ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ o ' 12 ~ . y-- o , 199•~b ~ 0 iD ~ ~ ~ / • • ~ / '~C~ / i 7 1 ~ ~ O ' QOG•Di'tR- =Y , V .v. P_at: . ~ • , , ? f , j" , a • ~~,ry55ION 1 ~ ' " `,I / ( ~ • ~ 4- • - _ ' ( ~p,' ~ • ~ ~ 4 ,'~pRT ~ , ~-c ~ ~ / ~ o _ ~ 1 N ERN - ` ` ~ ~ _r'-._.. - ~ - 4~~`~ . . ~e-I reenacres . _ . o ;~:L~' . ~ v. , t ~ ~ ~ • ~ v-' ~ e • ! ~ , ~ ~ . . ' ja1~ _ f ~ " - _ a f r o ' • ~1 , '"~"1 ~ . r _ ! `1~ ~ ' • 0 ~ ~ O • ~ ~ • M~ 13 ' • • t • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a ~ ,0 .0 VIGINry ~ ?At 4/ c,971u ~ I~► „ K ic~ tr,cN c\,nl ~ a~'n C!A"r,: . 5cx~, U 5.61 ~gec` ~iC , - _ ~ . ~ , , ~ , Autborizatian tp PerfQrtri So~ ' Yls Tesflng Sponsor's Engineer: d -,q EV~ -1A A CCiI/,J~'~ C~ Project Nstne: ~ Spokane Couat3' pra1et No. 1"Ili9 auihorization betweGn Spokane Councy and C42LIV ~~Gry whose interest Zn the project is !~l~,~,~/~ (9~' C0i1"a"'y~~1O~ } 7 o~k M) , is enFered :nto this ~ ' dgy of - I9-27 This authorizehon to the project k1l0-wm as Aju~QppAz4zr v/ A~ E (Prt"t N.M Dr+gea sddrw, or projom eo Whereas inctividuaIs and panics narned hcrem have an tnterrst in the Pfoj~t, $uthonzc $po}~e Count ar~d ity a ab°v~ d~~bed propeny or Y gcnts to perfortrt the folIowin,g ~'e-s~~ ~~l~C~aeJ (,)LGIt~~, ~ /~i-4~z~ /~~~r~ jPerf°rm etNGturai soU's testing Work to detet-rryne the Subgiade Modulus stre ngth of the so2..1j\ . e . logj 2 Report the test resu]ts to the Sponsor or the Sponsor's Ergrieer_ And it is undecstaod that th.e Spongor's ErLgi,neer will be responmbte for reducing thc data and perfornung the statisAa analyvs to determjne the design value, and nat the mdividuals and patties named heman as having an intcrest in the a.bove desGribcd property or project agese to the faIIowing I Keiatbtuw Spokanc Caunty ar its $gcncs fnz perfarrmng tb,c sl,cvctuai 8oi1's tcstcng work ac cost plus 10% 2 Any Hilluag amottnt duc, inciudinE aly expensts tneurred tn the collmtion of an avardee ar,counC muse be ;wd wlthin 30 d8y6 0f iavoice date nnd Pnor to thc Counry's aoecptanoe of tht pmect fnr fiLng or flttal plat tecardjng If a project a pruirtt is appraved andlor recottkd with a balana sbll owtog, ft wnpsid bzlance shall bt paid vnthurt 30 daya af jnvoloe date 3 Mt ussdexsip$d agsms th3t thex fccs and reimburmblt expeases arc due payahlc upvn raceipt nt billutg as SpevfitQ above 4 Arw invoiccs not paid v►nth'n 30 darys vf tbc Lnvwcc dacc wslf be cvas,idcred delmquent If aay oumtamdag balancc Qn tbr accrr.:at ot ttus prosvct i~ nbt y~gd tAthin 30 da7s af invoicx datt, nv ftuthtr work wi12 bt pmfformed unul the en~c aacount bzla~o~ u paid any balaace on [he s.ccout~t for ihts progect nvt paid anth~n 65 dAyS af the lrvv:cc datic may result in 1e94 acuon or thE uuUauon of oollec'bva preoedure6, iacluding Tderral co a eolloction agcnc~► Tt~c Spnaaor will be liable for aAy and alI c~~penses incvn~ by the County Eor collect= of overdue acaounLs SThc utvc,7= a e:o ~ sent ►~o at~enuos~cc of Name- C80jdN ilEST REALTY, L. L. C. , Addregs- 3808 NORTH SiJLLiYAN BoAD BLDG N-15 , Ctty and StsLe SPOKANE, uA "lip Code ___"216=1,kY Phone No (509 ) 924-I720 6 ate 517I97 Author~aation Si~ature_ R4B D Name of SiVnatory I3 . GRAGG ~ SE (~IC&U pn=1) Ike urrwwvw am oNimins 3o NasInro fuj188qt$l13 403 1661 u o rtri L66t 9 Z N b r urvnoO 3NVNods aDn13038 Q3AI3338 ~ .juL.LrvaNRaau 4!I ] ICC T1Q,` i LMOS::6.~N ~ I~Af~ 'J WfT .1V YW4W~4ih(s _ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ NN ~WIL .1~•-_1_Y~Oh..Aq=~ ~ i 220WM ~Y B~ADw'Sk~Ba[K lm! 1! ~ ~ 35 9UILMr CX trt 1- fl ' C SjOC2E FAp 9 FAST FOOD PAD I b9,JLT1 TENAWT nOJ]s' ~ u0~ ~ ~ 4~~g, BAY Ci- _......ar55 EeSLWIW - - - ~ L ' ~ 49 ~ 45000 SF n u u 22 500 5~ U ~ ~ r I "r SO BAT r r 50 8A7 30 QM ~ r f 4 U FiJ7lRE I 1. K~ rl 0= •.GW ooc7c o = ~ O ~ ~ o ~ ( eCCE55 CeSCA`~ 7 ~ c',i n I rlf m 1 rv ~ - ~ ~ 1 Qt ~ ~ C"rS5 COCK 6\o CCOSS OOCr ;D 1 1 O ~ N N O ^ I ~ i~ ~ Q ~ ~ p Q t~+ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~r W~ m~ N ~ 0 N~ ~ I soa 1 y ~ CR059 GOd, V I ~ L- ~ - _ ~ \ • ~ _L ~IOL~ ~ ' +e 1-3 ZOn'NG 6B 61 1I a e N 15T $jREET ~ a ~ . ~ N \ ~ ~ \ (A N ~4 \ \ ~ aon sx \ \ \ m ~ yt \ \ ~ 1O ~ m ane n ~ ~ a ~ N Ki t~T 0 L rn n ~ cn ~ raOaTU n m u 1 a-- o_ 9~ V ~ ~ rn ° R~9~~ ~F A9~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p F ~ 1 I I1~~ il ~ A $0 ~~g OP O h ~LJL'Jl Jpej a a ~HQ~o v_ m ~ / 0 \ 00 p ~ > 4 4•-11 J ,V ~ ~ ~C, T y A 0 t > o ~ -1 Z b ~ ~ 1~ 47 tA ~ A ~ ~ O c~ v ~ ~ ° • , „ $ p ~ g ~ ~ ~ o ~F Z p A r~ rn ~ rn Q Z ~ rn a~ 1 ~ o O O 0 -u - - ~ - P~ N w ~'t~5 ~ °n ~ " r : A Z ~ M ~ ~ 10e7L' ~ ~ o r~ wr w+c ~uys[R6 waw►/°tn w.srC+ arl! w~+ .M ~ t GPOWN BUSINESS PA2K 1~..~a Md,z~► nr p i CROWN WEST REALT7 . ~ a..o..o..~. , PGKAK' We T?GNPbwrr 6oOCMCw& 90"00 OL0.0 LWOSrroD 0 Inc# ~ ~ylo~ ~ rT ~d ~,d P13~g Desi. AWA ow ~ REC~IVED JAN 1 j1 r~►~6 Washington State Eastern Region ~ Department of Transportation 27 14 N MayTair Street SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEL , Spokane WA 99207-2090 Sid Mornson Secretary A ransoor aen (509) 324 6000 January 15, 1997 Mr John Pederson Spokane County Planrung West 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re Industnal Park Zone Reclass Dear Mr Pederson, WSDOT has reviewed the applicant's December 19, 1996, revised traffic analysis for the above re-zone and re-development proposal While we may not disagree with the study presented, it does not address those areas that were unpacted by the pnor proposal In the 1994 Industnal Park analysis conducted by Taylor Engineeruig it was found that the redevelopment of thls site would unpact the Sullivan Road and Trent interchange which did not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the expected traffc As a direct result of tius the apphcant agreed to ulstall a traffic signal and wlden the east bound off ramp Due in part to the cost of these unprovements the current apphcant is seekuig the removal of the conditions of approval which provided for these needed improvements We must question the intent of ttus study and the process used to generate this study Why is this study not duected toward those areas that were deternuned to be adversely unpacted by the 1994 Taylor Industnal Park study? Why was this traffic study not scoped as other traffic studies are through Spokane County Planiung? Cnven the current situation rtis our belief that this development is being processed vvithout sufficient regard to its potential envuonmental impacts As a result WSDOT cannot accept the current traffic documentation as bemg adequate based on Taylor Engineerulg 1994 Industnal Park Study This study identified the fact that the Sullivan and Trent eastbound off ramp is currently at level of sei-vice "F" and does not have the ability to accommodate additional traffic (see attached Taylor Engineerung Study) As a result we would request that the followuig condition of approval be placed on this development • The applicant shall design, fund, and install a traffic signal system and any necessary related devices at the westbound and eastbound Trent/Sullivan ramp ternunals If the above rrutigation is not acceptable we would ask that this re-zone be derued, as adequate transportation facilities do not exist to serve tlus development as documented in the attached Taylor Engineenng Traffic Study J ~ Mr Pederson January 15, 1997 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding the above please feel free to contact Greg Figg or myself in our Regional Plantung Office at (509) 324-6199 Sincerely, MARK ROHWER Acting RegYOnal Planrung Engineer MR gf attachment cc Frank Ide, Taylor Engineenng Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers . , • ~ f ~ a y 1 cv t 1:!:iiy .3. ii 4=3 C=a t.i zxy r 1 z7X c_ S = P ' 93 PROQOSED R= Z ONE , 1994 Traff ic Study Su pl ement # 2 KovembPr 4, 19~a STATF.HENT of PURPOSE The purpose of this supplernent is to summarize capacity analyses at the intersection of the Trent ramps at Sullivan Road . for future conditions With the ptoposed rezone. In addition, the analyses of the intersections of the I-90 ramps and Sullivan were zPdone to assure all movements had LOS "D" or botitez (paqsa 4 and 5 of Attachment "CA", Rovision # 3, contains the revised capacity analyses). These analyses uere performed in response to the Waghincttnn QfntA T?anarl-ms~nt nf Trar~annr* ~ n» ~ c !LT ~ f1 f1 T 1 .fJ 1r 1 IS~. • A • fiREPT RAHPS & SULLIYAN ROAD The f oI 1 owinq is a summary of the capacity anal yses performed for "Build" conditions at the intersection of the Westbound ramD from Trent at Sullivan Roacl ag a SignAlized inter- section {Attachment "CA", Revision # 3, contains thp ac.tiial output of HCS85}: w ~ ~ ~r~w i ~r~ rr ~r~.~r w 2000 "Build" Sullivan & Wb Trent Ramp (Siqnalized) DELAY KOVF.MENTS (in secs ) LC18 --------a..---------------r....--rr Westbotund Lts, Thrus, b Rts 21.3 C Korthbound Lefts & Thr»r, 77.14 r. Southbound Thrus & Riqhts 30.6 D Intersectfon velay = 23.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C --.r--.i.---^----..~ ~~►~-------~~r~ r.-r...--r Delay = Stopped Delay per Vehicle 5 sec oY' 1 ess LOS nA" 5.1 to 15.0 sec LOS "B" 15.1 to 25.0 sec LoS "C" 25.1 to 40.0 sec LOS "Dt" sn. i tm rn n r r.nc • _ To analysrP mpprations at the eastbound ramps and Sullivan Road, numerous iterations indicated the ramps could maintain adequate level9-of-service with the proposed rezone without ssgnalization if an additional lane is provided. The analyses were based on procedures described in Appendix I(of Chapter 10) of the 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL (Attachment "CA", Revssion # 3, contains the actual output of HCS85) uith the assumption all . Tayl or Fhgincav= neering, Inc. Traffi c Study Syppl w*nts• I• p•Is iamcia ~ November, 1994 - - . . . eastbound movcments occur during the northbound anly phase at the vegtbound ramps. The fol l owiny is a,surronary (Attachment "CA", ReviBion f 3, contains the actual output ot HCS85): 1994 Trent Bb Ramps b Sullivan Road (Unsiqnalized) - RESFRVE MOVFMENTS CAPACITX LOS Eastbound Lefts 169 D ~ Eastbound Rights 228 C Reserve Capacity = Yehicles per Hour 400 vph or more LOS "A" 300 to 399 vph LOS "8" 200 to 299 vph LOS "C" 100 to 199 vph LOS "D" 0 to 99 vph L03 "E" Less than 0 vph LOS "F" NOTfi: HCH85's procptc]»rRS arQ based on through movements and rfqht turns on the major street (Sullivan) beinq unimpeded. - As indicated by the foregofng analyses, the intersections maintain adequate levels-of-service with the signalization of the Westbound ramps and the addition of an eastbound lane on the ramp trom Trent Avenue. These analyses are based on year 2005 with the rezone traffic projections. Hocrever, it should be noted the Washinqton Department of Transsportation I&uu agreed to urdal.C LdzC 11Caz (1994) COUt1t5 rOr the ramps. Phasin9 of the recommended impzovements should be determined based on W.S.D.O.T.'s latest counts. Taylor Engineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Scpplement s. I• P. 'i 2 Novernber, 1994 V1 . W . . ~a ~z z0~ wo x a~ H U~H 4 > U H 0 4 Haa U 1 / (ri /l Tayl 4r Erzgirie~ri~g PROVO'SED RMZ ON= r CAPACITY ANALYSES i Revision # 3 November 4, 1994 INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW The standard process for determining operating conditions estimate "levels-of-service (LOS's)"113. The "ideal" capacit f a typical roadway is 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph) per Ianef2l. The worst congestion on roadways occurs at intersections uhere competing traffic flows (e.q., left turns -vs- opposing movements, etc.) "share" the roadway's capacity. Capacity analyses were performed using the "1985 HiqhWay Capacity Software (HC585)", computerized implementation of the procedures and pararneters contained in the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: Special Report 209 (HCM85). Capacity analyses were performed for the 1993 "design hour volumes" With the proposed project for the following intersections: The remainder of this attachment is the summary output of HCS85. "The concept of ' I evel s-of-servi ce' is defined as a Qualitative measure describinq operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or passengers. A Ievel -of -service (LOS) definition generally describPS thR%R rorAi tions in tQrms of such factors as spead aTtA tYa\!0l ftTnG fYQ0A^en rn%nn1119nr ~..L........~.Lw•sso, cotirfot t aY,c3 LutlvCiliCIlGQ, and safetY. 31x 1 Cvel N-vL-service are defined. They are given letter desiqnations, from 'A' to 'F', With LOS 'A' representing the best operating conditions and LOS 'F' the worst." --HIGHWAY CAPACYTY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation ReEesrch Board, Wa3hinqton, D. C. (August, 1955). [21 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C. (Auqust, 1985). TayI or E7lqineering, Inc. Traf f.i c Stvdy Suppl ement s. I. P.'s RFZC14E 1 Attachment "CA"/Revision No. 3 ANALYSIs cf 2005 Mith BIIILDOIIT b iiESTBOQIYD RmPS sIGNALIZED - - - - ~ 1 ' HCM: SIONALIZED INTERSECTION SVMMARY Center For Microcomputers In Transportatlon~- Streets: (E-W) N Trent Ramps (N-S) Sullivan Analyst: TEI File Name: S6TRNTRZ.HC9 Area Type: Other 11-4-94 PM Peak Cuinment: 2005 Directional Design Hour votumes (DDHV's) with Rezone ; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northhound ; Southbound ; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ' --r r ' ' - - - - - - r ` --r r IYo. Lanes 1 > 2 ; 2 < Volumes 361 1 253; 608 392 ; 401 28 Lane Width 12.0 ; 12.0 ; 12.0 RTOR Vols 84; 0; 9 ~ ~~~-----------r rr--w------------w ------r~--~ ~ Signal Operations ~ Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left ; NB Lef t * Thru ; Thru * * Right ; Right * * Peds Peds * * WR T.P f t * :SA T.r-- f t * Tlac v Triru ~ Right Right * Peds Peds ~ NB Right ;EB Right SB Riqht ;WB Riqht Green 45A ;Green 23A 10A Yel l ow/A-R 4 ; Yel l ou/A-R 4 4 T.nct Ti ma 3 4 j Loat 'rittte 3.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5#6 --------r ----------r---------------------`--------r~~ ~ ~ ~------w Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c q/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flou Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WB LTR 1234 631 0.89 0.51 21.3 C 21.3 C NB LT 2804 1184 0.93 0.42 22.3 C 22.3 C ca Tn 3 r.. 3 7 350 0. eak 0410 .su . b D 30.6 I} Intersec:fi on nP1ay = 23 . 9 (secf veh) Intersection L03 1- C It should be noted no changes in geometric deslgns are required. . 3'aylor Fhg3neerin9r, Inc. Traffic Study Supplareit S•I•P•'s REZCINE 2 Attachnnt "CA"/Revision No. 3 ~v v -v ~ ~ r,.. ~ J AINALYBIS of 2005 with BUILDOIIT b EASTBOIIKD RAMP8 IINSIGHALIZED Based on procedures described in Appendix I(of Chapter 10) ' of the 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY 14ANUAL, the fol I ouinq estimates Were derived. #*****~*~***~***********#******~*~r~r**~*****~************************* 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS *****************t***tt*ttt**t~fft*t*f***f**~*~*~*~~~*~**,~,r~~~*~*~~~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .95 AREA POPULATION.................. 300000 NAME OF THE EAST EST STREET......... Tr n Eb Ramps NAME OF THE NORT ~SOUTH STREET....... Su~I~van NAME OF THE ANALYST.. TEI DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ~mmfdd~yy)..,... 11-04-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .p.., P.M. Peak Hour P OTHER INFORMATION.... 2000 Wl Pro osed Rezone b Wb ~tam IIS Signalized INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: SxOP SICN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN ~.----------r - m --r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -r~ ------r TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WS NB SB The actual estimates have factored n accordance with the LEFT 179 0 0 the west~ ound qreen b red (i.e. RIGHT 682 1 ~ 680 thislattachment see Pano north ~han W~t.qQft d trafe~c other ---r -r---------------r--.. r -------~r r-----------.r m ------r ~ r NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 1 2 2 LANE USAGE L+ R LTR ~ ~ ~---r----- --r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None) ~M- -r--~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M-- -----w--- m --r VEHICLE COMPOSITION (Default Factor = 1.22) ~ r -----------r r r m r ~ ~ - -r m m-m-mmm ------Y r CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2) CAPACITX AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE -...~--w~ ~ ~~~---------------r-----~ r~-------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT v~pcph) cAJpcph~ cM~pcph~ cSHJpcp~~ cRApcSHTYv L4S m -r - m r -r MINOR STREET EB LEFT 187 356 356 > 356 356 > 169 169 >D D THROUGH 0 412 412 > 412 > 412 > A RIGHT 711 939 939 939 228 C MINOR STREET WB LEFT 0 120 37 > 37 > 37 > E THROUC3H 412 412 > 1000 412 > 999 412 >A A RIGHT 1000 1000 > 1000 > 999 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 0 1000 1000 1000 1000 A NB LEFT 0 553 553 553 553 A -------r.. r-- --------w ----------rm It should be noted the eastbound off-ramp requires tuo lanes to achieve these 2evels-of-service. Taylor Engineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement S.I.P. `s PFEKM) ItF'l,~ 3 Attachment "CA"/Revision No. 3 Nvv-d ~-y4 ~un ioc : ~~o r+r~ ~ ,.~,:.~T~~...ca ...t z.rvsL-o=-a~xvtc:r~ ••t~•• or Dg=?ER iut I_ 9A tc~vs-~== :z..i•t. ~LV►~nL~t,~L ij11ZKat!t.i'AYtV SUMMAKY , Center Far Microcamputers In Transportatlon StreA}s; (F-W) T-4n Nnrth (N-E) 6ullivnri Analyst: TEI File Name: Sb90BHRZ.HC9 Aresn 'T'y=+n : nthPr 11 OS 74 Commar+t : ~nn5 Di rect i onal Dasign Ilcur VoI urnez (DDIIV' 3) Wi th RCLutle ====-==~re----==_==== ; rc►zLvuuiid ; weszbouna ; Northbound ~ Southbound ; L T R~ L T R; L T R; L T R ~ ; r F-w ~ No. Lanes 1 > 1 1 j 2 2 ; 2 1 Volumes 450 2 107; 530 1289 ; 1509 724 Lane Width ; ;12.0 12.0 12.01112.0 12.0 ; 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 36; 0; 241 -r -r--w --r----------r ---r..-- Siqnal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left ;NB Left * Thru ; Thru * * Right i Right Peds Peds * * WB Left * ; SB Lef t Thru Thru * Right Riqht * Peds Peds * NB Right JEB Riqht S8 Riqht sWB Right * Green 21A ;Green 17A 40A Ye11vW/A-R 4 ;YelloW/A-R 4 4 Lost Tirne 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Lenqth: 90 s ecs Phase combination order: #1 #S #6 Intersectfon Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vjc g/c Approach: mvmts Cap Flocr Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WB L 1492 365 0.65 0.24 26.0 D 21.2 C LT 1494 365 0.65 0.24 22.2 C R 1492 1044 0.07 0.70 2.8 A NB L 3229 646 0.91 0.20 38.7 D 13.8 8 T 3510 2418 0.59 0.69 3.6 A SB T 3510 1599 1.44 0.46 37.5 D 31.8 D R 1492 680 0.75 0.46 13.2 B Intersection Delay = 23.0 (secJveh) Intersection LOS = C -..---...-----r ~ ---r--~~ Tayl or Ehgineerinq, Inc. Traf fic Study Suppl ement g, r,p,'9 pAM znrj REZ40M 4 Attachrrerit "CA"/Revision No. 3 r+ov,7ur-y4 mury nv : ' r,~ ~ - - - - ~ ~~-•~i.~i~.Z~~ ~r~~~~~~~~~ HCM: SiONALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Center For'Nicrocomputers In Transportatibn Streets: (E-W) I-90 South (N-S) Sullivan Analyst: TEI File Name: Sb90BSRZ.HC9 Area Type: Other 11-05-94 Comment: 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) With Rezone ; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound ; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R --r - -r r r ~ r - ~ No. Lanes ; 1 14 1 2 1; 2 2 Volumes ; 264 1 1389; ; 1555 640; 191 1768 Lane Width 1112.0 12.0 12.0; ; 12.0 12.01112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols ; 463; ; 213; 0 ~ ------w ~---r ~ Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * ;NB Left Thru Thru * Right Riqht * * Peds Peds * WB Lef t ; SB Lef t * Thru ; Thru * * Riqht ; Right Peds Peds * * NB Right ;EB Right SB Right ;WB Right Green 30A ` ;Green 8A 40A YelloWfA-R 4 ;YellowjA-R 4 4 Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ----r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --r ----w -r r -----w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --r Intersection Performance Summaty Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c q/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay L08 Delay LOS ~ ~ EB L 1492 514 0.54 0.34 19.0 C 31.9 D TR 1492 514 0.95 0.34 35.9 D R 1492 514 0.95 0.34 35.3 D NB T 3510 1716 1.00 0.49 27.0 D 22.5 C R 1492 879 0.51 0.59 5.4 B 58 L 3229 323 0.65 0.10 32.9 D 17.5 C T 3510 2067 0.95 0.59 15.8 C Intersectian Delay = 22.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ~~--r-..--- m -r r------ --r-------r~~~~~~ ~~~----------r------.n------- Taylor Ehgineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study SLU)planent' S. I. P. 's RE?.m 5 At tachrnent "CA"/Revisi an No. 3 12/20/96 13 22 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER ~001/010 . ~ ~ • • ~ Wor EL jr~eern , Inc. ~ Civil Design and 1.,and Planning PrindpaM- Pcrry M Taylor, PE. Starrliy R SltrGng Mark A Amnson i' E Dav,d C LorJU, PF- AA.toqeteo: December 19, 1996 sconM 8,~ch PE Fmnk R lQe, A5L4 Chie[ Finnndal Offlcer F.dwcn G WagruJd Mr. Pat Harper Spokane County Engineers West 1026 Bmadway Avenue Spokane, Washington, 99264 RE: Spokane 8usiness and Industrial Pack 21•acre Rezoae to I-2 Dear Pat: Enelosed please find our revised estimated trip generation for the revised site plan assaciated with the proposed rexone. The numbers were re-analyzed based on more reasonable sizes for the convenience store and fast food restaurant. As a result, the number of weekend tnps is more accurately represented. Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss. Su►cerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. FAI&O Frank R. Ide, ASLA Landscape Architect cc: Francine Shaw, Co. Div, atdg. & Planning Mark Rohwer, W.S.D.O.T. Richard RolInick. Crown West Realty Dave Lindquist, Lindquist Architects Rick Dullanty, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole 108 W Mlselon Ave • 9pokene, WA 89201-2345 •(509) 328 3371 FAX (509) 328 9224 12/20/96 13 22 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER Q 002/010 . Tayl o= Ersgii'iet exirlg, Tx~c - SI P' s ]PROpO:SED REZ ONE Traffi+c Studp Supplement TECSAICI,L SDM )OARY November, 1996 8?2lTHMENT of PIIRPOSE / PROJBCT SCOPIHG The purAose of this traffic study supplement xs to update trip generation estimates based on revisicns to the slte plan. ANALYT I CAL PItOC$DVR$S aa$ KETAODS The basic analytical approach folloWed the same staadardized principals and procedures used for the original study. They are described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRANSPORTATION and LAND DEVELOPMElVT (T6LD) as suppl emented by the Transportation Research Boatd's (TRH) NA TIONAL COOPERA TI VE HIGJYNAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 187 (NCHRP 187), and iTE's TR I P CENERAT ION. COMPARI80I1S of TRIP GANERATION 88TI!!R1'ES Exhibit 1 compares the trip generation estimates for the original rezone (ss documented 1n the original trafffc studp) with the proposed revisioas to the rezone; Attachment "TG" contains the actual output from ITE's TRIP C~'sNERATIoN. As shown in Exhibit 1, the pro8osed revYslon generates about 55 percent RXBISIT l: COMPARIOPS of TRIB GERMtSTION 88TUUlT88 REZONE ORIGINAL REVISED BDILDOUT DR-WAY DR-WAY TOTALS VOLUME VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 25,614 11,486 7-9 AM PK HR ENTfiR 2,205 546 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 528 288 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2,734 635~ 4-6 PM PR HR ENTER 892 360 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2,282 584 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 30174 948 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOG 16,803 12,168k/ SOIVDAY 2-WAY VOL 7, 425 10s687 Source: Institute of Transportation Enginee=s TR I P GENERAT I ON less trips on sn average weekday. However, it generates a less than 70 pexcent less during the morninq rush hour, and a little more than 70 percent less during the afternoon / evening rush hour. Tayl or FMgi»eetinq, I»c. Traffi c Study SWp1 ement S. I.B. 'e RBVIsm jam= 1 November, 1996 12/20/96 13 23 05093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER Z003/010 , . Whereas st generates about 28 percent less va Saturdaps, it generates nearly 44 percent more cn Sundays. The difference on Sundays is attributable to the u9e of specific land uses where appllcable (e.g., "Convenience Stores", "Fast Fvod Restaurant", etc.) whereas the original traffic sttidy used ITE's Land Use Code 320, "Shopping Centers", "Shoppinq Centers" have much lower Bunday rates than those of the specific commercial uses. As a=esult, it has beea concluded the revised slte plan (as develcped by Lindquist Archltects) substantially reduces the traffic impacts of the approved rezone, especially during the peak hours. Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Trafff c Study S4pp1 ernen t 8. I. p. 's RBYlm imm 2 Novelriber, 1996 12/20/96 13 23 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER 16004/010 A'r"~ACI-~MENT ••TG'• TRI P G=NERAT I ON M 0 T IMATES 12/20/96 13 23 '8`5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER a 005/010 Tayl or Erlc~i1-iekc,- ritzg, Inc _ S_ I_IP _ • s REV I SEM REZ ONL ~ ~LKWXCIW as%wxssa►sss INTRODDCTIOH The purpose of this report is to document the estimation ot traffic generated by the proposed revisions. The ttlp qenezation estimates are based on trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportatian Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERA3'ION. Trip Geuesation Aaalysis ^--ww~~~~~~~~ ~~~--r----.rrr-r~~-------r..----...-^...-----^------ ` GENERAL LIGIiT INDUSTRIAL 12,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJVSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG wKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 84 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 2 7-9 AM PR HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 1 4-6 PM PR HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 10 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 12 AM GEN PK FIR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 1 AM GEN PR HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 12 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 2 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 11 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 13 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 16 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 2 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 8 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 l PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL LICHT INDU3TRIAL 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJIISTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLVME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6,97 4.24 1.00 157 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 4 7--9 AM PR HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 21 ------------------w ~ ~ ------------------------w-r r Tayl ot FhgiAeering, Inc. Traffic Stt,d► Sti.vplemmt / Attachment 671G'" S. I. P. 's R8YI= RmCm 2 November, 19.96 12/20/96 13 24 '05093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER 9006/010 . . , -------------r--...-------------a+ r^----- r~ ------------------w- GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL contlnued 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJU3TMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 ~.00 1.00 3 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 19 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 22 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 20 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 .00 2 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 23 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 3 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .40 1.00 21 PM GEM PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 24 SATORDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 30 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAG .14 .41 1.00 3 SVNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 15 PK HR ENTER .OS .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 2 7 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION - ,---,,GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ~ 55,000 G.F.A. AVERACiE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ~ Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLnME - AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 ^363 ~ 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 42 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 6 4-6 PM PK IiR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 47 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 54 AM C3EN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 50 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 6 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 56 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 8 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 Sl PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 59 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 73 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 8 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 37 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 6 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~w w~~~`r ~~~.w ~ ~ Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl or FMgdneeratng, Inc. Traffic Study S4Wl ement / Attachntent `°IC3" S• I• P. t8 FBVIam JamQIQs' 2 November, 1996 12/20/96 13 24 '$5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER f~007/010 . ~ GENERAL LIGHT INDOSTRIAL 45,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJVSTMEKT DR-WAY ITE-Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME - AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 314 ~ 7-9 AH PR HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 ,00 1.00 7 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 41 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 39 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 44 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 41 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 5 AM OEN PR HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 45 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 7 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .QO 1.00 42 PM 4EN PK HR TOTAG 1.08 1.18 1.00 49 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 59 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 3 PR HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 6 SvNDAY 2-WAY vOL ,68 1.14 1.00 31 PK HR ENTER .OS .00 1.00 2 PR HR fiXIT ,05 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL 10 .33 1.00 5 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 110,Q00 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMfiNT DR-WAY ITE-Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME r..-r ~ ~ ~ ~ AVG WRDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 767 h 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 84 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PR HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 101 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 13 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 95 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 108 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 100 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 111 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 17 PM 6EN PR HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 102 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 119 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 145 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 7 PR HR .0? .00 1.00 8 PK HR ~XIT OTAL .14 .41 1.00 15 BUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 75 PK HR ENTER .OS .00 1.00 5 PK IiR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 6 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 11 ----Y ---r Tayl ar &gineering, Inc. Traffi c Study SLppl ement / Attachment "'M" S. I. P. 'e Rwsm RBS= 3 Novertber, 1996 12/20/96 13 25 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER [it 008/010 . ~ HOTEL 89 OCC ROOMS AVERAOE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ~ ITE Code 310 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ' AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 8.70 3.13 1.00 774 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .40 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .27 .00 1.00 24 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .67 .84 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .41 .00 1.00 37 4--6 PM PK HR EXIT .35 .00 1.00 31 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .76 .89 1.00 68 2nd HI AM PR ENTER .36 .00 1.00 32 2nd HI AM PK EXiT .29 .00 1.00 26 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .65 .85 1.00 56 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .43 .00 1.00 39 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .33 .00 1.00 29 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .76 .90 1.00 68 SATORDAY 2-WAY VOL .87 694 1.00 77 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOI, 8.48 3.42 1.00 755 PK HR TOTAL .75 .88 1.00 67 Source: institute of Transportatlcn Sngineers TRIP-GENERATION ~ GENERAL OFFICE 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLIIME - --------r --r ~ ~~--~~------w. --~--w-... ! AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 454 7--9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.37 .00 1.00 53 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1.00 7 7--9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 ,00 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 .00 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1.16 1.00 62 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 53 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 5 PR HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 4 PR HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 9 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 22 PK HR ENTER .06 .00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 3 Source: TRIP1GENERATIONansportation Engineers GENERAL OFFICE 14,~00 G.F.A. AVERAaE STANDARD ADJUS TMENT DR-WAY I TE Co e 710 RATE DEV I AT I ON FACTOR VOI~t~ME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 291 7-9 AM PK HR ENTLR 2.37 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PR HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 38 Taylot Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study StWplemmt / Attachmerit '4M'" S. I. p. 's RBVIm RBZ= 4 November, 1996 12/20/96 13 25 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER o009/O10 GENERAL OfiFICE continued 14,400 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJDSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 .00 1.00 7 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 .00 00 33 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1.16 1..00 40 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2 2nd nd HI A~M PK TOTAL ..00 00 1.10 1.00 N~A 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2 2nd nd HI PM PK TO~AL ..00 00 1.18 1.00 N~A SATIIRDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 34 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 3 PR HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 6 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 14 PK HR ENTER .08 ,00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 2 m ° m m m-m Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION q IOH TURNOVER RESTAUR AV 5,000 G.F.A. ERAGE STANDARD ADJU6TMENT DR-WAY Code 632 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 177.87 78.63 1.00 869 w 7-9 AM PK HR ENTSR 7.55 .00 1.00 38 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7.26 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 14.81 9.61 1.00 74 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER ;.68 24 .00 1.00 36 4 6 PM PK HR EXIT .00 1.00 26 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 12..92 11.35 1.00 65 AM GEN PK HR ENTER 10.72 .00 1.00 54 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 11.61 .00 1.00 58 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 22.33 15.59 1.00 112 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 14.13 .00 1.00 71 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 12.53 .00 1.00 63 PM GEN PR HR TOTAL 26.66 29.46 1.00 133 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 229.34 119.45 1.00 1,147 PK HR ENTER 7.24 .00 1.00 36 PK HR $XIT 7.85 .00 1.00 39 PK HR TOTAL 15.09 6,52 1.00 75 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 209.46 130.24 1.00 1,047 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL 12.16 .00 1.00 61 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---r r mm mm M ---w Source: InBtitute of Transpottation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl ot FSh9aaeersng, Inc. Traffic 5tudy SiMpl ement / Attachment "?G" S, I, p, 's 1mIsm 1wCw 5 November, 1996 12/20/96 13 26 05093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER 010/010 . . FABTFOOD NO DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 4,006 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ~ ITE Code 833 AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 786.22 147.56 1.00 3,145 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 21.62 .00 1.00 86 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 16.31 .40 1.00 65 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 37.93 21.42 1.00 152 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 21.25 .00 1.00 65 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 18.84 .00 1.00 75 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 40.09 25,86 1.00 160 AH GEN PK HR ENTER 41.88 .00 1.00 168 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 34.26 .00 1.00 137 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 76.14 21.84 1.00 305 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 55.82 .00 1.00 223 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 51,52 .00 1.00 206 PM OEN PK HR TOTAL 107.34 111.81 1.00 429 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 822.89 326.51 1.00 3,292 PK HR ENTER 54.98 .00 1.00 220 PK AR EXIT 54.98 .00 1.00 220 PK HR TOTAL 109.95 55.42 1.00 440 SVNDAY 2-WAY VOL 693.25 366.55 1.00 21773 PK HR fiNTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR fXII . 00 .00 1.00 A PK HR OTL 127.11 51.70 1.00 918 Source: Institute cf Transportation Enginee=s TRIP GENERATION ~ CONVENIENCE MARKET AVERAaE STANDARD ADJUSTI~lENT DR-WAY 5,000 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUMF ITE Code 853 - - ---w ----w w ----w mm- AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOI, 845.60 163.67 1.00 41228 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 113 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 22.62 .00 1.00 113 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 45.23 18.52 1.00 226 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 JJ6 4-6 PM PK HR fiXIT 31.29 .00 1.00 6 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 62.57 36.32 1.00 313 2nd HI AM PK ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 1I3 2nd HI AM PK EXIT 22.62 .00 1.00 113 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL 45.23 18.52 1.00 226 2ni HI PM PK ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 156 2n HI PM PK ExIT 31.29 .00 1.00 156 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL 62.57 36.32 1.00 313 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1,448.33 735.17 1.00 7,242 PK HR ENTER 28.94 00 00 115 PK HR EXIT 26.66 .00 .00 3 PK HR TOTAL 55.58 .00 1.00 278 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 1,182.06 608.38 1.00 5,910 Source: Institute of Traasportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Taylet !~'ign»eering, Inc. 7"raffic b`tcdy Sigplement / Attachraent "1GG" s. I. P. 's RBYlgv Rjmw 6 Novembar, 1996 9 AWA w * 0 T~tylor Engmeermg, I~ Civil Design and Land Pl Aw anning pnncipals Perry /b1 Taylor PE Slunlcy R Sltrltng MarkA Aronson PE David C Larsen PE Assocaates Scon M Busch PE Frunk R /de, ASLA Chief Financial Otficer Edwri: G Wagntld 5POKANE BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPOSED REZONE TO I-2 Update to 1994 Traffic Study ~Il Tq y~ Q~F WASy/4 ~ ~ ~ Prepared: December 10, 1996 y By: Jun Borgan O 17205 S RFC~sr~~`° ' S~ONAL~~ EXPIRES ( 0• ~1 ~ Consultant: Taylor Engineering, Inc. West 106 Mission Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-8831 / FAX (509) 328-8224 106 W Mission Ave • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 ' Tayl or Erlgirie4EB! ririg op, =ric _ S I P' s PROPOSED REZ ONE Traffic Study Supplement TECHNICAL SUMMARY November, 1996 STATEMENT of PURPOSE / PROJECT SCOPING The purpose of this traffic study supplement is to update trip generation estimates based on revisions to the site plan. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES and METHODS The basic analytical approach followed the same standardized principals and procedures used for the original study. They are described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRANSPORTATIDN and LAND DEVELOPMENT (T&LD) as suppl emented by the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) NA TIONAL COOPERA TI VE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 387 (NCHRP 187), and ITE's ?'RAFFIC ENGINEERING HANDBODK. Other standard references used in this study included, but were not limited to, the following: (1) ITE' s TRIP GENERATION; (2) TRB' s 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACI TY MANUAL / Speci a 1 Report 209 (HCM) ; (3) The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) MANUAL on UNI FORM TRAFFI C CONTROL DEV I CES f o r STREETS an d HI GHWAYS ( MUTCD) ; and, (4) The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A POLICY on GEOMETRIC DESIGN of HIGHWAYS and STREETS. ' COMPARISONS of TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Exhibit 1, on the following page, compares the trip generation estimates for the original rezone (as documented in the original traffic study) with the proposed revisions to the rezone; Attachment "TG" contains the actual output from ITE's TRIP GENERATION. As shown in Exhibit 1, the proposed revision generates about eleven percent less trips on an average weekday. However, it generates 58 percent less during the morning rush hour, and 55 percent less during the afternoon/ evening rush hour. As a result, it has been concluded the revised site plan (as developed by Lindquist Architects) substantially reduces the traffic impacts of the approved rezone. Taylor Rrigineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study"Sypplement S. I. P. 's REVISM RFlQNE 1 November, 1996 EXHIBIT 1: COMPARIONS of TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES REZONE ORIGINAL REVISED BUILDOUT DR-WAY DR-WAY TOTALS VOLUME VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 25,614 22,694 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2,205 848 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 528 571 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2,734 1,135 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 892 747 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 21282 963 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 3,174 1,414 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 16,803 C-_-29,5 3 __2 - _ SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 7, 425 24_, 934 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION ~ , Tayl or Erigzneerinq, Inc. ?'raffic Study Supp1 ement S. I. P. 's REVISE) RFlQiff 2 November, 1996 , - ` r--- ~ T- , z2-o o0- 1 ~ Y AaCM eArtwv+r L I 1 1 C STOQE PAD ' FAST FOOD PAD ~ K&LTI Tt?VAlJT $ q AM a.4~ .0 5/' ~ - , ~ , u u u u u 45000 SP y ~ 50' B.ST 22,500 SF ftlR.R: ( j OOOC N1~1 ~ DOGtiC MO~ ~ -4 ~ ACCCM CAMM~ ,7 V y ~ 1 p CCIS7 OOOC Z 070SS OOCC Q4AOP 1 + c~ ~ ~ C ~ C-~ 40 4p vo ~ KO N p y~ 1 ~ A ~ 4 G 1 50cr 250' ~ ~ CfiOfiS 0OC1C 6O' 1 ~r ~ c _ I, - L-7 ~J Ia zor+aO aa 6►z I - - , - - - - - - - 1ST STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N k adn n ~ ~oa u ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ; am a \ rn N -4 ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~Q D ~ ni _ ►.i °'S ~ 3 ~ d n O ~2~ u p O ~ I~~ ~ ~ ~ Dv (S~ ~ ~ A ~ r rn ~q rn ~ q~ Q q p (D ~ q ~ ~ % ~ S . z ~ 4 ~ .a,,,~ ~ ~ ~ov . wa r... ras~r+~or wme~ ant rua rav CQOWN BUSINESS PAQK LIND4UIST ARCNITECTS .9•!G► ~C .m.,.D„4 M C.A,p... =V'M 1NE$T REALTY nrrw SAowru ftot : . A _ 1 .MO..C w. YJ W H ~ ~ `H . 0H HN .W . Hz zo WH . ~H ua ~w Hz Hw 90 a H a H , Tayl or Erzgirzeeri.nc,1 , =rzc _ P_' s REV I SED REZ ONE TRIP TION ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the estimation of traffic generated by the proposed revisions. The trip generation estimates are based on trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERA TION. Trip Generation Analysis GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 12,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 84 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 2 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 1 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 10 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 12 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 1 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 12 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 2 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 11 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 13 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 16 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 2 ~ SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 8 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .OS .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 1 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY , ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 157 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 21 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 3 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 19 4-6 PNf PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 22 ?'aylor Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study S'c,(pplement / Attachment "TG" S. I. P. 's REVISID REZGVE November, 1996 , - ~ GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL continued 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY , ITECode110____________RATE __DEVIATION ___FACTOR____VOLUME _ _ _ AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 20 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 2 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 23 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 3 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 21 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 24 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 30 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 3 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 15 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 2 GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ~ 55,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 383 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 42 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 '.00 1.00 9 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 6 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 00 1.00 47 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1..16 1.00 54 . AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 50 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 6 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 56 ~ PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 8 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 51 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 59 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 73 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 4 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 8 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 37 PK HR ENTER .OS .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 6 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl or &gineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement / Af tachment "TG'► S. I. P. 's REyISID RFlQNE 2 November, 1996 , ~ GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 45,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 314 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 7 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 41 4-6 PM PK HR EIVTER .12 .00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 39 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 44 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 41 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 5 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 45 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 7 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 00 1.00 42 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1..18 1.00 49 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 59 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 6 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 31 PK HR ENTER .05 .00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT .05 .00 1.00 2 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 5 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 110,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 110 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ~ AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 6.97 4.24 1.00 767 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .76 .00 1.00 84 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .16 .00 1.00 17 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .92 1.07 1.00 101 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .12 .00 1.00 13 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .86 .00 1.00 95 ! 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .98 1.16 1.00 108 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .91 .00 1.00 100 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .10 .00 1.00 11 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.01 1.10 1.00 111 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 17 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .93 .00 1.00 102 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 1.08 1.18 1.00 119 Taylor &gineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement / Attachment "4G" S. I. P. 's RES/ISID RFZCfYE 3 November, 1996 ' GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL continued 110,000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 1 ITECode110____________RATE`_DEVIATION___FACTOR____VOLUME _ _ _ SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1.32 1.48 1.00 145 PK HR ENTER .07 .00 1.00 7 PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 8 PK HR TOTAL .14 .41 1.00 15 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .68 1.14 1.00 75 PK HR ENTER .OS .00 1.00 5 PK HR EXIT .OS .00 1.00 6 PK HR TOTAL .10 .33 1.00 11 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION HOTEL 89 OCC ROOMS AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 310 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 8.70 3.13 1.00 774 ~ 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .40 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .27 .00 1.00 24 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .67 .84 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .41 .00 1.00 37 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .35 .00 1.00 31 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .76 .89 1.00 68 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .36 .00 1.00 32 2nd HI AM PK EXIT .29 .00 1.00 26 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .65 .85 1.00 58 , 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .43 .00 1.00 39 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .33 .00 1.00 29 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .76 .90 1.00 68 ' SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL .87 .94 1.00 77 ~ PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL .00 .00 1.00 N/A SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 8.48 3.42 1.00 755 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL .75 .88 1.00 67 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Tayl or FJzgineering, Inc. Traffic Stczdy Suppl ement / Attachment "?G" S. I. P. 's REVISM RFZQw 4 lYovember, 1996 , ` GENERAL OFFICE 22,500 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ~ ITECode?10____________RATE__DEVIATION___FACTOR____VOLUME _ _ _ AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 454 ' 7_9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.37 .00 1.00 53 7 9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1100 7 . 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 60 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 .00 1.00 11 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 00 1.00 51 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1..16 1.00 62 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .00 1.10 1.00 N/A ( 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .00 .00 1-.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .00 1.18 1.00 N/A SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 53 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 5 PK HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 4 PK HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 9 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 22 PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 2 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 3 Source. Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION GENERAL OFFICE 14,400 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 710 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME VG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 20.19 4.24 1.00 291 ~ A 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2.37 .00 1.00 34 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .29 .00 1.00 4 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2.66 1.07 1.00 38 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .47 .00 1.00 7 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.28 .00 1.00 33 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2.75 1.16 1.00 40 2nd HI AM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL .00 1.10 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL .00 1.18 1.00 N/A Taylor Ehqineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement / Attachment "?1G" S. I. P. 's REVISID REZQKE 5 November, 1996 , ' ~ GENERAL OFFICE continued 14,400 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY _ _ _ ~ ITECode710____________RATE__DEVIATION ___FACTOR____VOLUME SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.37 1.48 1.00 34 PK HR ENTER .22 .00 1.00 3 PK HR EXIT .19 .00 1.00 3 PK HR TOTAL .41 .41 1.00 6 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .98 1.14 1.00 14 PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 1 PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 1 PK HR TOTAL .14 .33 1.00 2 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANT 51000 G.F.A. AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 832 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 177.87 78.63 1.00 889 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 7.55 .00 1.00 38 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 7.26 .00 1.00 36 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 14.81 9.81 1.00 74 , 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 7.24 .00 1.00 36 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 5.68 .00 1.00 28 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 12.92 11.35 1.00 65 AM GEN PK HR ENTER 10.72 .00 1.00 54 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 11.61 .00 1.00 58 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 22.33 15.59 1.00 112 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 14.13 .00 1.00 71 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 12.53 .00 1.00 63 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 26.66 29.46 1.00 133 ~ SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 229.34 119.45 1.00 1,147 PK HR ENTER 7.24 .00 1.00 36 PK HR EXIT 7.85 .00 1.00 39 PK HR TOTAL 15.09 6.52 1.00 75 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 209.46 130.24 1.00 11047 , PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL 12.16 .00 1.00 61 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Taylor F.Ylgineering, Inc. Traffic Sttzdy Supplement / Attachment "TG" S. I. P. 's REVISFD RFZGYW 6 Novenber, 1996 ~ FASTFOOD, NO DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 71500 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ~ ITECode833 _ _ AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 786.22 147.56 1.00 5,897 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 21.62 .00 1.00 162 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 16.31 .00 1.00 z~~ 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 37.93 21.42 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 21.25 .00 1.00 159 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 18.84 .00 1.00 141 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 40.09 25.88 3 d o AM GEN PK HR ENTER 41.88 .00 1.00 314 AM GEN PK HR EXIT 34.26 .00 1.00 257 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 76.14 21.84 PM GEN PK HR ENTER 55.82 .00 1.00 419 PM GEN PK HR EXIT 51.52 .00 1.00 386 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 107.34 111.81 1.00 805 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 822.89 326.51 1.00 6,172 PK HR ENTER 54.98 .00 1.00 412 ' PK HR EXIT 54.98 .00 1.00 412 PK HR TOTAL 109.95 55.42 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 693.25 366.55 1.00 5,199 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL 127.11 51.70 1.00 953 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION , _ CONVENIENCE MARKET AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY 15,000 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ITE Code 853 , AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 845.60 163.67 1.00 12,684 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 339 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 22.62 .00 1.00 339 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 45.23 18.52 1.00 678 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 469 , 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 31.29 .00 1.00 469 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 62.57 36.32 1.00 939 2nd HI AM PK ENTER 22.62 .00 1.00 339 2nd HI AM PK EXIT 22.62 .00 1.00 339 2nd HI AM PK TOTAL 45.23 18.52 1.00 678 2nd HI PM PK ENTER 31.29 .00 1.00 469 2nd HI PM PK EXIT 31.29 .00 1.00 469 2nd HI PM PK TOTAL 62.57 36.32 1.00 939 Taylor Ehqineering, Inc. Traffic Study Sypplement / Attachment "TG" S. I. P. 's REVIM) RFF.ZCIW 7 November, 1996 ~ ' ~ CONVENIENCE MARKET continued 15,000 G.F.A. RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME ITE Code 853 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 11448.33 735.17 1.00 21,725 ~ PK HR ENTER 28.90 .00 1.00 434 PK HR EXIT 26.68 .00 1.00 400 PK HR TOTAL 55.58 .00 1.00 834 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 11182.08 608.38 1.00 17,731 PK HR ENTER .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR EXIT .00 .00 1.00 N/A PK HR TOTAL .00 .00 1.00 N/A Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION , ~ ~ " Tayl or Ehgineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement / Attachment "?G" S. I. P. 's REVISID REZCm 8 November, 1996 1 Slvnind R a-9,7 Date-Time. 05-28-1997 13 48 31 Sensors 5 Hertz 25 Location Temp 69 Operator LAMONT Zdsm 0 Multi-force 4 Force 2.10 2 10 2 10 2 10 Comments TESTING FROM GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR AT 0.00 TO KIERN AN AT 100 FT STATIONS Note NORTH LANE Note AT PRESSURE REGULATOR 1 1 0 000 0 2 09 25 0 128 3 67 2.19 1.02 0.60 0 43 1 1 0.000 0 2.07 25 0 128 3 67 2.17 1.02 0 60 0.44 F2 1 1 0 000 0 2 10 25.0 128 3 77 2 22 1.04 0 61 0.46 F3 1 1 0 000 0 2 08 25.0 128 3 78 2 23 1 04 0.62 0 49 F4 Note AT 100 FT FROM STATION 2 1 0 100 0 2 06 25 0 130 4.14 2 19 0 97 0 59 0 47 2 1 0 100 0 2 04 25 0 130 4 10 2 16 0 96 0 58 0.48 F2 2 1 0 100 0 2.10 25 0 130 4 24 2 24 0.99 0 62 0 49 F3 2 1 0 100 0 2 07 25.0 130 4.15 2 20 0.98 0 59 0 49 F4 3 1 0 200 0 2 04 25.0 132 4 00 2 27 1 07 0 64 0 49 3 1 0 200 0 2 03 25 0 132 3 98 2 27 1 08 0 65 0 53 F2 3 1 0 200 0 2.08 25.0 132 4 09 2.32 1 10 0 66 0 55 F3 3 1 0 200 0 2.04 25.0 132 4 02 2 28 1 09 0.65 0 54 F4 4 1 0 300 0 2 03 25 0 139 3 89 2 49 1 18 0 73 0 61 4 1 0 300 0 2 Ol 25 0 139 3.85 2 47 1.17 0 72 0 60 F2 4 1 0 300 0 2 05 25 0 139 3 94 2 55 1 20 0 74 0.62 F3 4 1 0 300 0 2 02 25 0 139 3 87 2 50 1 18 0 73 0 62 F4 5 1 0 400 0 2 04 25 0 132 4.06 2 15 1 01 0 63 0 51 5 1 0 400 0 2.01 25 0 132 4 05 2 14 1 00 0 62 0 50 F2 5 1 0 400 0 2 08 25 0 132 4 20 2 22 1.04 0.65 0 52 F3 5 1 0 400 0 2 04 25.0 132 4 12 2 18 1 02 0.63 0 51 F4 6 1 0 500 0 2.01 25.0 122 3 72 2 32 1 23 0 78 0 64 6 1 0 500 0 2 10 25.0 122 3 91 2 47 1.29 0.81 0.67 F2 6 1 0 500 0 2 19 25 0 122 4 06 2.55 1.32 0.82 0 69 F3 6 1 0 500 0 2 04 25 0 122 3 90 2 49 1 30 0 82 0 66 F4 7 1 0.600 0 2.03 25 0 138 3 83 2 33 1.08 0 61 0 50 7 1 0 600 0 2 11 25 0 138 4.06 2.45 1 12 0.63 0 52 F2 7 1 0 600 0 2 14 25 0 138 4.28 2.56 1 16 0.65 0 53 F3 7 1 0.600 0 2.10 25 0 138 4.12 2.48 1 13 0.63 0.50 F4 8 1 0 700 0 2 01 25 0 134 3.74 2.35 1.26 0 81 0.67 8 1 0 700 0 2 09 25.0 134 3.95 2 50 1.32 0 86 0.69 F2 Page 1 Slvnind 8 1 0 700 0 2 18 25 0 134 4 13 2 63 1 38 0 90 0 72 F3 8 1 0 700 0 2 12 25 0 134 3 98 2.56 1 35 0 89 0 71 F4 9 1 0 800 0 2 03 25 0 140 3.48 2 18 1.15 0 73 0 60 9 1 0 800 0 2 08 25.0 140 3.55 2 30 1 20 0 76 0.63 F2 9 1 0 800 0 2 15 25 0 140 3 87 2 43 1 26 0.80 0 66 F3 9 1 0 800 0 2 10 25 0 140 3.72 2 35 1 22 0 78 0.63 F4 10 1 0 900 0 2.02 25 0 130 3.94 2 23 1 07 0 64 0.53 10 1 0.900 0 2.03 25 0 130 4 00 2 26 1.08 0 65 0 54 F2 10 1 0 900 0 2 05 25 0 130 4 04 2.28 1.09 0 66 0 54 F3 10 1 0 900 0 2.02 25 0 130 3 99 2.25 1.07 0.65 0.53 F4 11 1 1 000 0 2.03 25 0 134 3.66 2.29 1 14 0.72 0.58 11 1 1 000 0 2.04 25.0 134 3.70 2 30 1.15 0.73 0.57 F2 11 1 1 000 0 2 08 25.0 134 3 74 2.34 1 17 0.74 0.57 F3 11 1 1 000 0 2.06 25.0 134 3 76 2 34 1 17 0.74 0 56 F4 Note. END TESTING AT KIERNAN 12 1 1 100 0 2.01 25 0 122 2 73 1 79 0 90 0 56 0 49 12 1 1.100 0 2.04 25 0 122 2 80 1 84 0 92 0 58 0 51 F2 12 1 1.100 0 2 08 25.0 122 2 88 1 88 0.93 0 59 0 52 F3 12 1 1 100 0 2 07 25.0 122 2 86 1 88 0 94 0 59 0 52 F4 Page 2