ZE-041-94
,
r
SPOKtil'7 E #e. OLJ 11 1 Y
HEARltlll E1f,~~~~~ ~~~~~~E
FIN,`DINGS OF FACT, COI'►+1CLUSIONS A►P'rID ORDE,R.-:~IVO
INTRODUCTION
Ttis matter has come before the Hearing Exami.ncr Ctumaittee on November 17,
1994, T'he members of the Cor,mittee present are; Brenda Bcdenstein, Chair,
Fra.nk Yuse and Toru Nemsian.
PROPOSAL
The sp~nsor, Pentzer T:evelopment CorWraticn requestts approval c~~ a Zon~
Reclassification, ZE41-94, from Heavy Industrial (1-3) to Community Business
(B-2) on approximat~ly 13.7 acres for offices, retail sales, restaurant and those uses
al.lowed in tlae Cornmunity Business (B-2) zone and to Industriai Parrk (1-1) on
apgroximately 7.8 acres for light assembly, offices and rhose uses allowed in the
Industrial Fark (I-1) zone.
FINDINGS OF FACT ANX3 CO1'+~CLUSIOrNS
1. The prvperry is generally located east of and acijacent to Sullivan Road,
approximately 1,600 feet south of Trent Road, in the SW 1!4 of Section 1,
T'ovvnship 25 North~ Range 44 EWM, ,Spokane County, Washington.
2. 'I'he CoMM.i,ttoe adopts the Planning I7eparmnent Report as a part of this recorcL
3. The existing~ land uses in t~e area include gravel mining, industrial park, solid waste
tr-ansferJrecyclying station, manufacturing and other industnal uses.
4. The ptoposed use is conipatible with existing uses in the area.
S. The Comrehensive Plan desi at~es this si~ as ladustri~, Th~ Industri~.l categc~ ~ ~
P ~ ~5
is intend+ed for industrW development and to reserve land for indusaW gurposes.
'~e IndustrW category will be campvsed of avariety of industsiaL miining and
transportati+an uses. ~ew commerciall and residenti.a11 uses wili be found. Sma11-
sca1e a+ctavities related to industrial uses such as cafes, service stativns, parts and
service stores wiU also be characteristic of the IndustriaJl category. ne pragvsed
IndusaW Park (I-1) and Comnunity Business (8-2) zvnes are consistent wit~ and
implement th+~ Goals, Objectives ar~d Decisian Guadelines of the Industrial category.
6. The prcrposed zoning does implenient and conform to the Comprehensive Plan.
7. T''he Arterial Road P'lan desxgnates Sulli~~ Road as a Principal Arterial, with a
reconmendeci righc of way width of 100 feet. in arder to impiement the Axteria1
Ro~.d F1an# the ~un~ty Engineer has requested dedication of 6 feet or an anwunt
equal tv 56 feet from the centerline on Sullivan Road for right of way and slope
easements.
c
8 The existing zorung of the property descnbed 1n the apphcation is Heavy Industnal
(I-3) previously estabhshed as Manufacturmg (Ni) (460) and redesignated to
Heavy Industnal (I-3) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement
the Spokane County Zoning Code
9 The provisions of RCW 43 21C ('The State Environmental Pohcy Act) have been
comphed with and a Deteiminaaon of Nonsignif'icance (DNS) was issued. The
Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS
10 The legal reqturements for pubhc notice have been fulfilled
11 The owners of adjacent lands expressed approval of the proposed use through
correspondence submitted to the file
12 The apphcant has demonstrated that cond.itions have substantially changed suice the
onguial zorung of tlus area and accorduigly, the proposed zone reclassification is
justified Specif'ically, changed cond.iaons include adoption of the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan and Artenal Road Plan
13 The proposed use will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, morals or
welfare especially in hght of the conditions recommended by the revievnng
agencies
14 The Comnuttee add.itionally findslconcludes
a The umque nature of the industnal park neighborhood supports the
estabhshment of Commumty Busuiess (B-2) zonuig to provlde services to
tenants of the indusmal park and adjacent industnal uses
b The apphcant accepts and agrees vvith all the recommended condltions of
approval
c Potennal unpacts of the proposed development are nutigated by the
recommended conditions of approval
d In this specif'ic instance, the Community Buslness (B-2) zomng classif'icanon
is consistent with the Industnal Comprehensive Plan category due to site
location and the conceptual design presented to the Hearulg Examiner
Committee
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1 All Cond.itions imgosed by the Heanng Exammer Commrttee shall be buiding on
the "Apphcant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property,
heus, assigns, and successors-in-interest
2 The follovcnng Condltions of Approval apply to the real property descnbed below
Industrial Park (I-1) Legal Description
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 2
f
That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North, Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows•
Commencing at the northwest corner of the southwest 1/4 of said
Section 1, thence south 00°35'S6" east, along the west line of said
Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 522.25 feet, to the
true point of beginning of this descrlption; thence continue south
89°49'36" east, 303.75 feet; thence south 00°03'31" east, 210.00 feet;
thence south 89°49'36" east, 314.25 feet; thence north 00°03'31" east,
729.89 feet; thence north 89°49'36" west, 100.00 feet; thence north
00°03'31" east, 280.00 feet; to the true point of beginning.
Community Business (B-2) Legal Description
That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North, Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of the southwest 1/4 of Section 1,
thence south 00135'56" east, along the west line of said Section 1,
660.30 feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 50.00 feet, to the east right of
way line of Sullivan Road and the true point of beginning of this
description; thence continue south 89°49'36" east, 472.25 feet; thence
south 00°03'31" west, 280.00 feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 100.00
feet; thence south 00°03'31" west, 729.89 feet; thence north 89°49'36"
west, 314.25 feet; thence south 00°03'31" west, 210.00 feet; thence
north 89°49'36" west, 244.00 feet, to the east right of way line of
Sullivan Road; thence north 00°35056" west, along said right of way
line, 1220.00 feet to the true point of beginning.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 The proposal shall comply with the Industnal Park (I-1) and Commuruty Business
(B-2) zones, as amended
2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally m accordance vvithun the
concept presented to`the Heanng Baiy Vanations, when approved by the
Plannuig Duector/designee, may be pernutted, includulg, but not lunited to builciing
location, landscape p'lans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All
vanauons must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the onguial intent of the development plans shall be mamtained.
3 Approval is requurA by the Plannmg Duector/designee of a specific hghtmg and
signuig plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building pernuts
4 A specific landscape plan, planang schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planrung Director/designee shall be subnutted vvith a performance
bond for the project pnor to release of buil&ng permits Landscaping shall be
installed and maultauied so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
unpaired. Landscapmg adjacent to the west property luie shall consist of a
mu►unum of 75 feet of Type III landscaping
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 3
~
5 Duect light from any extenor area hghtmg fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
6 The Plannmg Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Aud.itor a Tide Notice noting that the property in quesaon is subject to a vanety of
special condinons unposed as a result of approval of a land use acnon This Tide
Notice shall serve as pubhc nottce of the condiaons of approval affecting the
property m question The Title Notice should be recorded vvithin the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planmng Department The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of
a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection
and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7 Any further subdivision of the subject property shall comply with the Spokane
County Subdivision Orduiance and or Spokane County Binding Site Plan
Ord.inance and RCW 58 17
8 No outdoor advernsmg display (off-premuse sign) as defined by the Spokane
County Zonmg Code shall be pernutted on site On-premise free-standuig signs are
hmited to a maxunum of two signs (for the ennre parcel) with a maxunum square
footage of 150 square feet (for each face) and a maximum height of 20 feet.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Pnor to issuance of a building nernut or at the reauest of the Countv Enmneer m
ponluncaon v.~nth a CoqW Ro4,d Pmlect/mad Imbrovement Distnct, whichever action
Pomu firaL
1 Apphcant shall dedicate 6 feet or an amount to equa156 feet from centerhne on
Sullivan Road for nght-of-way and slope easements as necessary
Pnor to release of a b~,il,ding_pprnut or ~,e of h~roner , as nronosed
2 Access pemuts for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer
3 The apphcant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans
4 A parkmg plan and traffic cuculatzon plan shall be subnutted and approved by the
Spokane County Engmeer The design, location and atrangement of parlang stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineeruig practices Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Englneer, will be requued for any pomon of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
5 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomphshed as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 4
6 The County Engmeer has designated Special Roadway Standard for the
improvement of Sullivan Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development
This will require the addition of varymg amounts of asphalt along the frontage of
the development The construction of curbulg and sidewalk/pathway is also
required
7 All requwed unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washuigton
Standard Specificauons for Road and Bndge Construcuon and other apphcable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaunng to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engmeer
8 Access to Sullivan Road shall be prohibited until such time as specif'ically
authonzed by the Spokane County Engmeer only the two access points as
dehneated on the conceptual srte plan shall be allowed wnthout specific
authonzation
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway secnons and drainage plan reqwrements are
found ui Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592 as
amended and are apphcable to this proposal
10 No construction work shall be performed withui the exisnng or proposed pubhc
nght-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work
within the pubhc road nght-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer
11 All requued construction vvithin the existing or proposed pubhc nght-of-way is to
be completed pnor to the release of a bmlduig pernut, or a bond ui an amount
estimated by the County Engmeer to cover the cost of construcaon of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engmeer
12 There may exist ualines, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition
Spokane County assumes no financial obhgation for adjustments or relocation
regardung these utihnes Apphcant(s) should check vvith the applicable utihty
purveyor and the Spokane County Engmeer to detemune whether applicant(s) or
the uhlity is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work
13 The apphcant shall deed to Spokane County nght of way to equa156 feet from
centerline on Sullivan Avenue and shall construct an additional u-affic lane along
Sulhvan Road from Euchd Avenue northward to the proposed north property
boundary wnth appropnate taper Phasuig of the construcaon sha11 be based on
unpact from the proposed rezone to Sullivan Road
14 A nununum 20 foot wide easement shall be provided along the east side of Sulhvan
Road The purpose of the easement is to accommodate pathways, landscapuig and
drainage from roadways
15 A pathway accessible to the public shall be constructed along Sullivan Road. The
pathway is to be located wnthin the common pathway, drainage and landscape
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 5
~
easement area Spokane County shall be granted the nght to enter the easement for
the purpose of drywell and sign maintenance Snow removal from the pubhc
roadway shall be pemutted within the easement Maintenance of pathways,
drainage swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsibdity of the apphcant
16 The apphcant shall at time of each bLUldng pernut application provide a traffic
analysis that reviews the unpact of the proposal to the north ramps of Sulhvan Road
and Trent Avenue If signal warrants are met the apphcant shall be responsible for
the design purchase of eqwpment and construction of the signal pnor to issuance of
the budding permit.
17 The apphcant shall construct a nght turn lane on east bound off ramp at Trent and
Sullivan This turn lane shall be constructed to Washmgton State Department of
Transportation standards
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coorcimated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
2 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place theu
name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to
RCW 36 94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petiaon agauist the formation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the owner(s)'
property PROVIDED, this cond.ition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
unprovements called for in conjuncaon with the formation of a ULID by either
petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36 94
3 Apphcant shall make connection to Pubhc Sewer System Sewer Connection
Pernvt is requued
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method sha11 be as authonzed by the Director of Utilines, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordulated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an exisnng pubhc water supply when approved by the
Regional Enguleer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system vvill be made available Use of ind.ividual on-site sewage
disposal systems shall not be authonzed
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 6
~ •
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1 The apphcant shall contact the Department of Builduigs at the earhest possible stage
of design/development in order to be uiformed of code requuements
admuiistered/enforced by the department, e g, State Building Code Act regulations
such as requirements for exiting, construction type, occupancy classification, fire
hydrantJflow, fire apparatus access roads, accessibihty, energy code regulations,
and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All air polluaon regulanons must be met
2 Air pollution regulations reqwre that dust enussions dunng demohaon, construction
and excavaaon projects be controlled This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprmklers or suspension of activity dunng certa.ui weather conditions Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activities
3 SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e, mgress, egress,
parlang areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to nuninuze dust enussions
4 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposit:Lon of dirt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces If trackmg or spdls occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immed.iately to clean these surfaces
5 SCAFCA Regulation I, Amcle V, requires that a Nonce of Construcnon and
Apphcation for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency pnor to the
construction, uistallation or estabhshment of air pollution source Z'his uicludes any
fuel fired equipment rated at greater than 400,000 BTU/hour (boilers, hot water
heaters, ovens, etc ) It aiso includes gasoline stanons, dry cleaners, and other
sour+ces of air contanunants
6 Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i e, construction waste, etc )
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1 That the applicantlowner, shall engineer construct a signal system at the Trent
Avenue and Sulhvan Road North Ramp ternunals when deemed necessary by
WSDOT and/or Spokane County Engineers The mstallation of this signal system
shall consist of desigrung, provicling the signal equipment and related
equipment/fixtures, and the installanon of all eqwpment or providulg WSDOT the
funds necessary to do so This signal system will need to conform to the apphcable
WSDOT design standards
2 That the applicantJowner, shall engineer construct a nght turn lane on the eastbound
off ramp at the ramp temunals Thns nght turn lane shall he constructed to the
apphcable WSDOT standards for nght turn lanes and be constructed in a manner
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 7
with sufficient length that its use will not be mhibited by the projected left turn
queue at the ramp temunals
Pnor to the release of any builduig permits for this property the apphcant shall
prepare a traffic analysis for the Trent Avenue and Sullivan Road ramp ternunals
This analysis shall document whether or not the proposed development unpacts the
ramp ternunals If the proposed development unpacts the ramp temunals and it is
found that the LOS at these ramp termmals falls below "E" far the ramps or LOS
"D" for maunhne Sullivan the unprovements hsted above wnll need to be uistalled at
that time, provided signal warrants are meL Pnor to the installation of these
unprovements a developers agreement will need to be executed for work on
WSDOT/County nght of way
3 We would ask that this latest revision of the traffic study be mcluded vvith the
previous traffic study and SEPA checlclist that was prepared for ttus project to
insure the envimnmental documentauon for this project is based on the most current
information
HEC Order for ZE-41-94 Page 8
~
ORDER
The Heanrig Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Fmdings of Fact and
Conclusion, APPROVES the apphcanon of Pentzer Development Corporation for
the Zone Reclassification from Heavy Industnal (I-3) to Community Business (B-
2) on appnoximately 13 7 acres for offices, retail sales, restaurant and those uses
allowed in the Commuruty Busuiess (B-2) zone and to Indusmal Park (I-1) on
approximately 7 8 acres for hght assembly, offices and those uses allowed in the
Indusmal Park (I-1) zone as descnbed m the apphcatxon ZE-41-94
Motion by Frank Yuse Seconded by Brenda Bodenstein
Vote (3-0) UNANIlVIOUS TO APPROVE TBE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
HEARING E R CO E
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VO
CHAIR
^
Yc~
ATTEST
For WALLIS D HUBBARD
Planrung Duector
.
BJOHN W PEDERSON
N
Senior Planner
/l/l/~ ~.7, - /9V, 5;X
DATE /
Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggneved party has the nght to appeal this
wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of Counry Commissioners withm ten (10)
calendar days of the signing of this order Upon receipt of an appeal, a pubhc heanng vvill
be scheduled. If you desim to file such an appeal, you must subrrut a wntten appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Comnussioners,
West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$210 processing fee payable to
the Spokane County Treasurer
If you have any quesaons, please call the Planning Deparnnent at (509) 456-2205
HEC Qrder for ZE-41-94 Page 9
- ~ .
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FTLE# ZE-041.
Rclated File # ( )
Date to Review 11-17-94 Time # 1
Date to AA & DR 9-7-94 Time 1:15
Date Received 8-19-94
Project Name 1-3 TO I-1iSDP L.T ASSEMBLY PEN"I'~LER DEV No. Lots No.Acres 21.5
-Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS E SULLIVAN-S 'B' ST N'D' ST PARCEL # 01543-9090
Applicant's Name PEN"I-ZER DEV CORP Phone # 924-1720
Address 3801 N SUI_L.I VAN RLUG N-1 5-SPOKANT: WA 99216- I 670 Work #
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person P6one #
FI.OOD 7_ONF d NO W S SCHOOL 361
Enginecr / Surveyor's / Architect's Name TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
106 W MISSION STT: 206
SPOKANE WA 99201
328-3371 FAX 328-8224
Planning Contact Person '1'OM VELIIC,IJOI-IN PEDLRSON P6one # 456-1205
,
Date Submitted De.scription Initials
AUREEMENT "I'U PAY FEES CUMPLE"IED & COPY l'U ACCO U N' I'I N G
FINAL PLAT FEES GOMPI_F'IEU & COYY TO ACCUUNZ7NG
/ I NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 b COMPLETED - OR NHEDS TO BL SIGNEU
DEStC'TN DFViATION SUBMITTED
AL'IERATION TU PIA1' - BLOCKS & LOTS
F30ND RELEASED -RUAD & DRAINAGF IMPROVEMEN'IS
Q /q~ HFARING F.XAM XAPPROVFD _DENIED-_APPF.AI.ED 88C / PRQIEC'r _APYROVE7 _DENIED
~
~
_
~ ~ -
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FI LE# ZE.
Related File # ( )
Date to Review Timc #
Date to AA 8c DR 9-7-94 Timc 1:15
Date Received 8-19-94
Project Name I-3 1'O I-1 LT ASSL-'MBLY YENEZLR UEV No. Lots No.Acres 21.5
-Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS E SULLIVANIS 'B' ST N'D' ST PARCEL # 01543-9090
Applicant's Name PrNTl.FR DF:V C'nRP Phone # 924-1720
Address 38()4 N SULLIVAN BLDG N-IS-SPOKANE WA 99216-1670 Work #
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person Pbone #
FLOOD ZONE vt NO W S SCHOOL 361
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
106 W MISSION STF 206
SPOKANE WA 99201
328-3371 FAX 328-8224
Planning Gontact Person TOM VE1JIC Phoae # 456-2205
Date Submilted Df:sc:riptiun Initials
AGIZEEMENI' 10 PAY FELS COMPL.E'TED & COPY T0 ACCOUNIING
FWAL PLAT FEES CUMPL'1E-D & COPY TO ACCOUNIING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUflMITTED
1 / AI_TERATION TO Pt.AT - BI_UCKS & L()TS
BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS q
/ I HEARING EXAM APPROVCD _DCNIED-_APPEALE.D BBC / PROJECT APPROVED _DENIED
I'
~
~
u
~
u _
~
. P
~
. P
.
60
V~-
•
~ 1 ^ '`AA
~
. ~
. . ~ .
s
. ~ . . ~
(0o
e
•~4
~ ~
Q. :
k~
.
M +
ZE=4lm9
r H ig h G~oo "
J n .7-: ' S. ' e. .
~'~}c ~-wood School '
w f t ~
~
~i • ~ \ i w • v w I
001 NV ~
i~
t ~
43 10,4 145 14G 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 I~ v6O 16l-
M E P OY Av i ~ l . . r I IE
E
Q
7
Y, RICH ~.VE ~ o Z
~
, ,
0 F Q~ p J La
.vE OC M o ~ ~ ~
r.+
illivilisir-
Ja Cc A O GM~ G L 204I ~ • r '.i~~ .
--r~-
, ~
~ ~ . . ►-r"' qRi
-
2
~
KIERNAN a~f ~
\ •}{h ~ y • I _
\ ~ h I
I ` ~VYk h
. \ < V t I
'N er.~~ 1.5' TP, I
~
EjCL~D AvE t _
- . . . - - - - -
~
1 ~
~
~ IE UCI. I"D ` A v E-.
~
\
1
~
. , ~
.
L
BRIOGE
- ~ ~ N 11SO T .
_ - - - 1 I ~ 1 -
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Paqe 1
1
~
~
t
,
~
~ s 1
~
` • ~
. e ~
- J I r ` H` 9h ~ * y A v ~
~ i+►
. t , )..~l ; s Cr W, . . 1 160
d ~ :
}~~M04 157
> 154
~ • 151 152 ~ w
J Q ~.,,o.~r,e..• ~
~ ~T 1
~QrS
4
~
43
H E 148 4L 7
Z ~
< ~ Ja..~ "O, • p o
R.
RtiG uR p.3~ , V r, t \
v,
uR,.
~ g ~2 • ~R4
~ A
r
1 y 1 L- ~
► _ ~ ~ u c. L , U
_
~ ~ .
a ~
J -
. ~
~
. ~
~ # - , ~ ~ r.
4507 ' .
r ~ . - pa9e 2
-
_
g4
f or ZE 41
\ -
Staf f RepO r
,
G
ZE=41=94
/ ly ~ ~ yll.r` W ~ ~ 1 t o- v ~ y~ ` ~1/ F V L~ ~
~
~ • ~ ~ + . f
~y~ 1
t,
, ~t~-•~O,~G" "'i~
• ~ ~ ~ ~Y ~ QI ~ ' ` •.14V n
Z ~
I~ R b p.. l r 1'' 1 B~S& c ~ 1,a,~ , tV.i
-
• 2",~5 ~~..:'.".~i ie~' . ' ' . •1 - t _ ii ` r~
4VEf . ~ • N• • ■ !
~ • ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F 7f
~ i 4 ♦ • • • • ~ 1, ~ ~ • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r o ~ ii •
, . .•~•~•i ~'-Y~~~.
1• • rbe
" - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~y1
~ • '
• . 4 .
. . . e ~
. I • ° ~ o • I~0.16 . ' ° ° -I090 ~ t~~....• ► . ' ~ • •.rc-"so~• ~ ,
im • • f ~ ~ ° •I~~ • -.i~ ~
7 i • i t~
6" • -2 - I _
~
• db • o• w• ~ 1
C6 ,.`i~ PR 2040 Ve{Ox \ U
~ RO AD
M ~
$ts ' 2023 -~Q
Trentwood 2-
- Ii016 1 ~1.i~ ■ ~~i . . ~ ~ ~ ` C%
~
10jO j ~ d N , , 1 4.) ~ 4v
~WaterTank ~ I_ • ~ ~I _S;,''~h',~'. ~ ~ r~„
i
C { -
=~y~ • o ~ f8 0 t ~ • t~.~.~k--,- I
to20
d ~ 4n
, , ~ a ~ i ~ ~ ~f''
a~i e r ~ !
SuDWtabon Tra
r ' - P
t.' _ ' - r. ~ ~ •1 ~ . • wT - ~
~ ~ ~o- • - E(JCUD
t ~ ~
-r ~ -
owell - _ • Aushnf
tior►Ow
P PI c - ~
J
.J O
~ ~ • ° BOrrow it X
1000 - ' 7
12 - - = - - ~
- ~ i~ -
r ~ ' Bofr~ ` ~ ` ~~c
tNT~
. .
r^ e
i ~ 7 L t o ~
k
•
20'll
R ~
~ 4 ago ~ ' 1 ^ • ~ MISSlON
i .lp..:-~ , , ! ro~
(1Oi00
i ~ • ~ Greenacres
.
~
47
~ t o 00
11030
~ -„-.._...Z ~
,,VErtUE . •a_18
• - _ . rs~-~~ . r :~r~~ : = _
. f ' 141
• • a ~ ~ y^ ~ ~ ~ ~
t ~wtll ~ _ ~ o ; ~ • • ~ a~ a ~ ~ =
0~~.~ ' ~ .I~ ' ~ • • • 1 V ~ ~
' ~ • 3~~ IO]? ~ ~ ~ o ~ r-
°a 1 . I u
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . „vow / ~ ~ • G • .
• ~
/ • • ° ~ o
~ to...... ~ ~L_.__ • • • • ~ •
l • ! - 7 ~ • • i-~ ~ -+yi ° _ , ~ ~ • ` ~t
, ~I ~ ~ ary~iLt ~ • o 0 0 ~ • • c WI Y ~ ~ • . ..-i~ •
j . i ~ o • ' 't~ ~ ° o ~ ~ ~ h H WA
r o a ~
sch
t . ~t
l%~ .wll
1 ` A • ~
~ II ~ . ~ ~ ~ i;:-~. _ Vera"e
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 PaQe 3
,
t
.
? 75 i
/
_ r
9 „
~ u
~
~ i }n,4Vnlli~ u ` 1t Ce~
~ ~11 ~a►+ 4ch B
t,
~ a~ ~~~ah ` ~ 1
OC r~Jrl ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ • ~ - ..-I ~ i
Z~ . „ ~~1-_ ~~f~___ i
V6
I'-
~ , ~ ~ 4• n , ,t ,-~.~r ~
10-16~ ~I ~ WQHs ~ ~,.--"'~~j~•lur N ~
~ M ~ ~ ~r ♦ ~H ~ ~'~~~M 2~4~ • ~ ~
Y l
I ~ Mt~ t' t-'
~
~ ~r ~ ~ ~ •~"r 30 1 ' t
A- ~ --y ~
• 1{ ~ + 1~ ~ - s ^ ~ Ti~ ~ ~ J - ~ ~i j t
` .i ~ ITf~~ q ~ ~'i {',,J +'f~ ,1 f~~r ~
8M 201; ozo
uoA°
°Od 2
~a Trent`u - ,2016
Z01
i)ir~ r q
G(av
Wa~e~T ~ si~ ~ ~ ~ •WT r ~ ~USt1p
Z C-5-
w 11--,." Sub IeUUn
; . ~ ~ • ~
•
,U Ct~'~ ~
,t 7p10
We~~
" ; ~ ♦ ~ \ i ♦ 4 ~ _ ~
t ' x~ ~ ~ ~
z ";~p pIt + gprro
1
~ ~ ~.r..rF~'Y _~,;.r•fIr"r'~~t'~' „h j ~ dooooo, Grp 2017
~ 1 ~°YwJ 1
G JOG
u 11
• p
i~ortP w
NA1~C1
1N 7 R !
• ~ ~ P ~
~ _ zw° ~ Cxreeria~res .
r • ~
rHFRN '03, .
03
~,,,~.,Tj• t, y~t.P.ll -r " ~ : • a 910
?
r • ~ ~1
~
;,'ii
' ' ~ ~ ;,►l,,
o
- ` 4 ~ ' ` ~ ~ . • ~ ~4 _ 1
~o Q w~►~1 , ,
c~ ~ ~~I o eR , ~ ~ •
~ ~ t 4
3 1
zo
S ~ ' ~i ~PMA ~ ~ • , ~ w ~ 1 ~
~ « , + -
~y
~
W A y Ctl ~ ~
y
It `
'
V2051ell E„ 20 30
'
~i . ~ 1' ~ _
1
v ~ 1.
< «
~
etadale
~ t _ ~ a ~J•~+~i°~'
~
! ~ , • -
' L,;.'~•~1r:
~ _ ~ ~ ~ i lt~t~ lt • ~ ~
n
~ -~`vw
` ~s• .,r~` C'S"a~~
t
SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK "CI"'n M"P
.,,*,THE PARK PROP09ED REZONE FA0M I-3 TO I-1 AND B-2
~ CONCEPYUAL SITE PLAN
~
~ S W 1/4 Of SECiION 1 T 25H R 44E WM SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINCTON ~1,_" ~ I.z~
~ i AUGUST 1944 ' ~.~y r r' 1~
.
m Mtik;ya-.
\ ~OC A
f-)
isr smCCI n r_~ l.._ I_ • I i_ _ I. ~ X~~ ~a,~'^31}~,~~6-a1-~t ti vy
1z~9 89 PRO,lECT INFORMAiION
- r - - Motn .K,. n a .c
N ~-L F?~'`Plu~'1u ~
~ l j. 1_ mw,«n us~m ta~~ ~if u
u IIIII''I'~7
Q I •a~ II I j '~~n~fl+l'I~~J I I rortenwv¢v nerao+tn us+vraor~
vat ruow .o.~ et aoCttnt ewe
~ ~ b . I I I ms un n.ot ■mom m cam M
wLsK un n uai
e
~ y r • 1 - - _ ~ y g ~ ~ ` ► r
i ' 0 1 I ~ ~
~1 ~ I ~ I i ( - ~ w~a mia
oma
'I
O ~ I' w {I a• ~ f1 IlfI~uWMIm.
~ ~ + I Ym ~ ~ FI IOWJG (PRCPOf~D) I i 729 E9 rkgx foaa
~w. . .imrtr
.v
s 2 20M40(Pmema)1 ~1Q ~ on
~ - i I I HI
m iill, 4
j ' ftW.mJ RGIID ~ ' 280.00' i 1 ~ toi w. .ar row ~oooofr rom
Q I I YN ~PhIIQ 17) CN 1p7 GMl
^ ~I I I I I I IG N I ndt t,f 1R1 O~ x' [M 6tl1S [t?-R
Xf ~D 4n O 7 [M q[ RM
i n~~~~~~~~~~r i,o, ~ v c;
N I I sa ~ i~xHe ~ a~~a ~ wiwiw
O u u a a .~,~a~.K mi~
iUT~ilI li i l i ,
~C, ~ Ks~T ~~I
g ~ ~ I I wos,.r.c a i eoa t+~ a ~ ea u~
1 ~
1 n i ttn~¢ fiw¢ a i iww m~coft nl w~4imw ~ini
r I
i i i I In'~~i~iiLir dln11111i1 ~~~~nitnUr
h ~ ~
I f~ ~ I~~~~ I~ I / I_ I ~ J ~ ~ - ~ NOI.C Rw~Yi Ol 1~IG1f1 I4M 0. I 1MJ00 CW~1
~[aww tv a i uairo co1n wrt wrt
i ~r.c a~w~eo can rac ua car r
W ` 11Ln, ~ ` I I AfI'~C~4 d~ /7GN0 CPb1 !qti[ u01. f41 I
P5' r ✓aoou ...-_avY .
N N ~
A►►uCMi P04Rn OCKlOPuI t CMVtlUPG+
~ yy p~v M ROAD ltDG F 1~
s~o...t ane-iem
.9,
~u UIIINI~IIII' - - 8 ~ „Dr- „ LEGEND
• • r - - Ha+fE E _ ~I I I I I I I i _ ~ , X ;
) " i ~
-F - ~ ~ _ ~ •
~
„ _
m ~ r i
~ a w ws.n ..~o
9-2 IOF?Ki ( ~
V %17C 11 ~
~UaStnt fAmr
suwvAN eoA.D PENTZER ~
~r~wosco am DEYBOPIEM
SPOKAACM~an"¢uxilf AAc CO-RPORATPOX
(D
~ ~tvso.s
~ rp(iallor Entlneering Inc =,LL I
(Jrl V
~ aw w yF
~ ~r.. .rn~ wrw ~ w 1
i IM~1 ~-en u Owl a. a~
60 JO 0 60 120
~3....• • ~ carastuu sh awN
Noa sa n.w a comw.a aat n n wucr cAut rttt PAOPOSED RIIONE FAp/ I-)
to aMa ewsto a ^cau awK reavosKS o"` I°~;
u'a -2 TO I-1 FNO 8-2
~
,
,
ti
f
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1994
SUBJECT: ZE-41-94, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL (I-3) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS (B-2)
AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-1)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Pentzer Development Corp
3808 North Sullivan Road
Builduig N-15
Spokane, WA 99216-1670
Agent: Frank Ide
Taylor Engineenng
106 West 1Vbssion Avenue
Suite 206
Spokane, WA 99201
Contact Planner: John Pederson
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Sulhvan Road,
approximately 1,600 feet south of Trent Road, in the SW 1/4 of Secaon l,
Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Heavy Industnal (I-3) to Commumty
Busmess (B-2) on approxunately 13 7 acres for offices, retail sales, restaurant and
those uses allowed in the Community Business (B-2) zone and to Light Industnal
(I-1) on approximately 7 8 acres for light assembly, offices and those uses allowed
in the Light Industnal (I-1) zone
II. SITE INFORMATION
A. Site Size: Approximately 215 acres
11 /'94 HEC S taff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 6
2
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan The property is located within the Industnal category of
the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan The Industnal category is
intended for industnal development and to reserve land for indusmal
purposes The Industnal category will be composed of a vanety of
industnal, rnirung and transportation uses Few commercial and residennal
uses wdll be found Small-scale activities related to mdustnal uses such as
cafes, service stations, parts and service stores will also be charactenstic of
the Indusmal category
The proposed zone reclassification from Heavy Industnal (I-3) to Light
Indusmal (I-1) is consistent with and implements the vanous Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guideluies of the Indusmal category However,
the small scale commercial needs of the industnal park neighborhood could
best be served by implementing the Neighborhood Busuiess (B-1) zone
The Neighborhood Busuiess (B-1) zone is intended to allow for hnuted,
small scale neighborhood (should not be larger than five (5) acres in size
and not exceed 600 feet of frontage along an artenal) serving retail and
office uses The purpose of the proposed Commumty Business (B-2) zone
is to provide for the estabhshment of commercial centers which will meet
the needs of a commwuty and to unplement the Major Commercial
Comprehensive Plan category The proposed Commuruty Business (B-2)
zone dces not implement the vanous pohcies of the Industnal category and
adequate regional and commuruty serving commercial zorung is located ui
close proximity to the subject property along the Sullivan Road comdor
south of Interstate 90 The proposed zone change to Community Business
(B-2) on approximately 13 7 acres is not consistent with the Industnal
category of the Comprehensive Plan
2. Arterial ltoad Plan The Spokane County Artenal Road Plan designates
Sullivan Road as a Principal Artenal with a future nght of way width of 100
feet The County Enguzeer has requested that the apphcant de(hcate 6 feet or
an amount equal to 56 feet from the centerhne on Sullivan Road for nght of
way and slope easements The proposal has been condhuoned to provide
for the needed nght of way if approved
C. Site Charactei•istics The sub~ect properry is rectangular in shape, flat in
topography, wi4h lawn and moderate tree cover Three existmg buildings are
located on the site and consist of an office at the northwest corner, a
dehcatessen/restaurant at the northeast corner, and a small mazntenance builcilng at
the southwest corner These btuldings will be retained and incorporated into the
conceptual development plan
D. Neighborhood Characteristics The surrounding neighborhood consists of
long-estabhshed uldustnal uses wnthm the Spokane Industnal Park and adjacent
propemes Large scale industnal uses are predominant in the area and include
Kalser Aluminum's Trentwood Plant, sohd waste transfer/recychng station,
gravel nunmg, and a vvide vanety of industnal uses and services Existing land
uses, wnthin the Sulhvan comdor from Trent south to Interstate 90 are consistent
vvith the Industnal category of the Comprehensive Plan
1
11/'94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 7
1 ~
. l _
E. Zoning Analysis The site and surrounding areas are zoned Heavy Industnal
(I-3) and have been developed for large scale mdustnal uses Pnor to
unplementation of the Spokane County Zoning Code on January 1, 1991, the site
and adjacent propemes were zoned Manufacturmg (N) (460) The proposed
Light Industnal, (I-1) zone is consistent wnth adjacent zoning classifications and
can provide local serving retail uses for the area. The proposed Commuiuty
Business (B-2) zone is not consistent vvith adjacent zorung classifications and
does not unplement the Industnal Comprehensive Plan categary Approval of
Community Business (B-2) zoning along north Sulhvan Road may estabhsh a
precedent for future busuless zone change requests
Proposal Heavy Industnal (I-3) estabhshed on January 1, 1991(4-60)
North Heavy Industnal (I-3) estabhshed on January 1, 1991(4-60)
South Heavy Indusmal (I-3) estabhshed on January 1, 1991(460)
East Heavy Indusmal (I-3) established on January 1, 1991(4-60)
West Heavy Industnal (I-3) estabhshed on January 1, 1991 (4-60)
F. Land Use Analysis The site and adjolrung propernes are within a long
estabhshed mdustnal area which extends north from the intersection of Sullivan
Road and Interstate 90 to the intersection of Sulhvan Road and Trent Avenue
This industnal area mcludes exisnng industnal zonuig classif'ications and a wnde
vanety of mdustnal uses including the existing Spokane Industnal Park, Kaiser
Alununum's Trentwood Plant, and other large scale industnal uses The uses
proposeti m the Light Industnal (I-1) portion of the proposed zone reclassification
would be compatible with existing mdustnal uses in the area However, the wide
vanety of commercial uses allowed in the Cotnmututy Business (B-2) pomon of
the zone reclassification are not entirely compaable wnth mdustnal uses in the
area, and would estabhsh a precedent for stnp commercial development vvithin an
estabhshed mdustnal comdor In addition, the Community Business (B-2)
pornon of the zone reclassificanon includes approximately 13 7 acres and ttus
amount of commercial zorung far exceeds the local, small scale needs of the
mdustnal park area
Site Office, deli/restaurant, maintenance building, parking areas and
undeveloped
North U S Army Reserve Center
South Indusmal park
~
East Industnal park
West Sohd waste recychng/transfer station, industnal storage
G. Circulation Access to the site is provided by Klernan Avenue which extends
east from Sullivan Road along the northern end of the project One a.dditional
access point to Sulhvan Road is provided by an existing dnveway at the southern
end of the site Ihrect access from the site to Sullivan Road is prohibited until
specifically authonzed by the Spokane County Engineer Internal access will be
11/94 HEC S taff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 8
s `
,
- - , .
provided by pnvate dnveways wtuch access existing pnvate roads withm the
' Spokane Industnal Park
An-affic study was prepared for the proposal and said study concludes that "the
buildout of the proposed rezone has only margmal effects on operations of the
pubhc roadways off-site when compared to buildout of the existing zomng " The
Washuigton State Department of Transportation (WSDO'1) reviewed the traffic
study and commented that "The study dces not adequately arddress the unpacts of
this development" The WSDOT requested that the traffic study be modified to
show a"no build opnon" and "a build opnon" The WSDOT also requested a
level of service analysis for the intersection of Trent Avenue and Sullivan Road
To date, the apphcant has not subnutted the requested revYSions to the traffic
analysis
H. Design
1. Proposed Site Plan: The proposed site plan is conceptual in design and
dces not provide specif'ic land uses or indicate buildulg square footage
However, the site plan data table does uidicate that all appropnate
development standards of the proposed Community Business (B-2) and
Light Indusmal (I-1) zorung classifications will be met and that potential
land uses include all those uses permitted in the requested zones The site
plan also shows that the easterly 7 8 acres of the site is proposed as Light
Industnal (I-1) zomng, and the westerly 13 7 acres is proposed for
Commuruty Business (B-2) zorung Due to the conceptual site plan design,
detailed site analysis for comphance wnth applicable development standards
of the requested zorung classifications is reoommended to be adnumstrative
and will occur upon applicaaon for a budding pemut
Use All those uses allowed m the Commumty Business (B-2) and Light
Industnal (I-1) zones
Proposed Build.ings Not provided
Building(s) Footpnnt Area Not provided
Site Coverage 50% in Light Industnal (I-1), 55% in Community
Business (B-2)
Maximum Structure Height 40' in Light Indusmal (I-1), 60' in
Commumty Business (B-2)
Total Floor Area. Not provided
Liizht Industnal CI-1) vornon
Building Setbacks Pronosed Reauired
Front yard (north) 80' 50'
Flanking yard (east) 50' 50'
Flanking yard (south) 35' 50'
Side yard (west) 30' S'
Parking Not calculated
11/'94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 9
a
r
fOIIlIIlILilIV B lII B-Z)_pOI'=
Builduig Setbacks Proposed Requued
Front yard (west) 75' 35'
Flanking yard (north) 80' 35'
Flanlang yard (south) 80' 35'
Rear yard (east) 15' 15'
Parkuig Not calculated
Proposed Bufferin g/Landsca ping Techniques Except for a 75
foot wide stnp of landscaping adjacent to Sulhvan Road, the proposed site
plan dces not illustrate the landscaping requumments specified by Chapter
14 806 (Landscapmg and Screening standards) of the Zoning Code
Substanaal site plan modifications will be requued to demonstrate
compliance vvith the apphcable provisions of Chapter 14 806 of the
Spokane County Zonulg Code The 75 foot landscape stnp adjacent to
Sulhvan Road exceeds the mmumum landscaping reqiurements specif'ied by
Section 14 806 040(2)(b), and the Planrung Depardnent recommends that
this 75 foot landscape stnp be required and meet the defimtion of Type III
landscaping A detailed landscape plan illustrating full comphance with all
zonulg cade regulations is requurA and will be reviewed pnor to issuance of
bufldulg pernuts To further nutigate the visual and aesthetic unpacts of the
proposal, the Planmng Department recommends that the Light Indusmal
(I-1) sign `standards be imposed for the entire parcel
Other Site Plan Considerations As proposed, two structures along
the southern boundary of the site and within the proposed Light Industnal
(I-1) zone, do not meet the nurumum setback requirements of the Spokane
County Zonmg Code IViinor site plan revisions vall be requumd to show
comphance wnth the applicable development standards of the Spokane
County Zonuig Code
The site plan subrYUtted for review by the Heanng Examiner Committee is
general in nature Detailed review to deternune comphance vvith all Code
regulations and condit►ons of approval is recommended to be adrrunistrative
and to occur at the Buildmg Penrut stage
~ramage I. Drainage A plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and
approved by the County Engineer's Department pnor to development
a
J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements Not applicable
K. Water Supply The proposal is within the Spokane Industnal Park Water
Distnct Provisions for water service will be met pnor to issuance of buildulg
pemuts
L. Sewage Disposal Connection to the exisang public sewer system is required
M. School 1'he proposal is in the East Valley School Dismct
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 10
i
♦
E _ 4
N. Fire Protection The proposal is within Fue Distnct No 1 The Fue Distnct
and the Division of Buildings Department (Fue Marshall) are required to approve
fire protection provisions pnor to issuance of bufldulg pemuts
0. Cultural Resources None have been identified
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Envunnmental Checkhst was subnutted by the sponsor and was revlewed by the
County Planning Departinent The review considered the specifics of the proposal,
other available infonnpon, County ordinances, other regulanons and laws, possible
standard Condstions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other
County pohcies and guidelines The Plannmg Department has determined that "No
probable sigmficant adverse unpacts" would result from the proposal being developed
and has issued a Deternunanon of Nonsigruficance ("DNS
The "DNS" was cuculated to 13 other agencies of junsdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment
The "DNS" comment penod ends November 15, 1994 and was advernsed 15
calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners
wittun 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site
The Hearmg Exanuner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the
pubhc heanrig
IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
That portion of the proposed zone reclassification from Heavy Industnal (I-3) to
Light Indusmal (I-1) is consistent wnth, and unplements the vanous Goals,
Objectives and Decision Gwdelines of the Industnal Comprehensive Plan category
The proposed Light Industnal (I-1) zone and proposed uses are compatible wnth
adjacent land uses and zoning classif'ications, and the requested Light Industnal (I-1)
zone is a"down zone" from the more intensive Heavy Industnal (I-3) classification
The Planrung Department recommends approval of the Light Industnal (I-1) requesL
The proposed zone reclassificauon to Community Busuless (B-2) dces not unplement
the Industnal Comprehensive Plan category and is inconsistent vath the specific
Goals, Objectives and Decision Guideluies of the Indusmal category The Industnal
category supports small scale commercial acavities wnthui industnal areas to serve the
needs of the industnal park neighborhood Typically, the Neighborhood Business
(B-1) zone is implemented in industnal areas to serve neighborhood needs The
proposed Community Business (B-2) zone, which includes 13 7 acres of the tota125
acre parcel, exceeds the small scale needs of the industnal park area, and adequate
regional and community servuig commercial zones and uses are located in close
proximity to the site along the Sulhvan Road commercial comdor The proposed
Community Business (B-2) zone may also establish a precedent for future smp
commercial development along Sulhvan Road inconsistent with existing industnal
land uses Therefore, the Planrung Department recommends approval of the zone
reclassification from Heavy Indusmal (I-3) to Light Industnal (I-1) and derual of the
proposed Commuiuty Busuiess (B-2) zone reclassification
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 11
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall
be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the
owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
i i. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property:
Light Industrial (I-1) Legal Description
That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of the southwest 1/4 of said
Section 1, thence south 00°35'S6" east, along the west line of
said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 522.25
feet, to the true point of beginning of this description; thence
continue south 89°49'36" east, 303.75 feet; thence south
00°03'31" east, 210.00 feet; thence sout6 89°49'36" east, 314.25
feet; thence north 00°03'31" east, 729.89 feet; thence north
89°49'36" west, 100.00 feet; thence north 00°03'31" east, 280.00
feet; to the true point of beginning.
Community Business (B-2) Legal Description
That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of the southwest 1/4 of
Section 1, thence south 00°35'S6" east, along the west line of
said Section 1, 660.30 feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 50.00
feet, to the east right of way line of Sullivan Road and the true
point of beginning of this description; thence continue south
89°49'36" east, 472.25 feet; thence south 00°03'31" west, 280.00
feet; thence south 89°49'36" east, 100.00 feet; thence south
00°03'31" west, 729.89 feet; thence north 89°49'36" west,
314.25 feet; thence south 00°03'31" west, 210.00 feet; thence
north 89°49'36" west, 244.00 feet, to the east right of way line of
Sullivan Road; thence north 00°35056" west, along said right of
way line, 1220.00 feet to the true point of beginning.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 The proposal shall comply with the Light Industnal (I-1) and Commumty Business
(B-2) zones, as amended
2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance wnthin the
concept presented to the Heanng Baiy Vanations, when approved by the
Plannuig Duector/designee, may be pemutted, includmg, but not lunited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pemutted zone All
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 12
. ~
i
vananons must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zomng
Code, and the ong►mal intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3 Approval is requued by the Plannvng Duector/designee of a specific hghtmg and
signing plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any budding permits
4 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planrung Ihrector/designee shall be subnutted vnth a performance
bond for the project pnor to release of bwlding pernuts Landscaping shall be
uistalled and mauitauied so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
unpaired. LandscapTg adjacent to the west property luie shall consist of a
minunum of 75 feet of Type III landscaping
5 Direct light from any extenor area hghnng fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary '
6 The Plannmg Department shall prepare and record wnth the Spokane County
Aud.itor a Tide Nonce nottng that the property in question is subject to a vanety of
special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use acaon This Title
Notice shall serve as pubhc notice of the cond.itions of approval affecang the
property in question The Title Notice should be recorded wntlun the sa.me time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planrung Department The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of
a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Ot'ficial on [ imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection
and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7 Any further subdivision of the subject property shall comply vnth the Spokane
County Subchvision Orduiance and or Spokane County Binding Site Plan
Ordinance and RCW 58 17
8 No outdoor advertising ci.isplay (off-prenuse sign) as defined by the Spokane
County Zonmg Code shall be pernutted on site On-prenuse free-standuig signs are
limited to a maxunum of two signs (for the entue parcel) vvith a maxunum square
footage of 150 square feet (for each face) and a maaamum height of 20 feet
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Pnox to issuance of 4_huildulgaernut or at~uest of te CouW En u r in
contunction vnth a Countv Roa,d Pmiect/road Imnmv_ement Ihstrict, whichever action
comes firS.L
1 Apphcant shall ded.icate 6 feet or an amount to equa156 feet from centerluie on
Sulhvan Road for nght-of-way and slope easements as necessary
Pnor to release of a buLildingernut or uie of xhe,p=e , as pno~ sed,
,
2 Access pernuts for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane Counry Enguieer
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 13
P ~
3 The apphcant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County EngYneer road,
drainage and access plans
4 A parlang plan and traffic cimulation plan shall be subnutted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer The design, location and amangement of pariang stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic englneeruig practices Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be requued for any pornon of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by velucles
5 The construction of the road unprovements stated herein shall be accomphshed as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
6 The County EngYneer has designated Special Roadway Standard for the
improvement of Sullivan Road, which is adjacent to the proposed developmenL
This will reqwre the addinon of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of
the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk/pathway is also
requued
7 All reqwred unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction and other apphcable
County standards and/or adopted resoluaons pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer
8 Access to Sullivan Road shall be prohibited unnl such tirr ke, as specifically %
ganmroadway unty Engine tka ~
9 sections and drainage plan requuements are
found ui Spokane Boazd of County Commussioners Resolution No 80-1592 as
amended and are apphcable to this proposal
10 No construcnon work shall be performed within the existing or proposed pubhc
nght-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work
within the public road nght-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer
11 All required construction wnthin the exisang or proposed public nght-of-way is to
be completed pnor to the release of a buildng pernut, or a bond in an amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer
1
12 There may exist unlities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, includuig property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition
Spokane County assumes no financial obhgation for adjustments or relocanon
regarding these utlhnes Apphcant(s) should check wnth the apphcable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to deteruune whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
a.n-angements for any necessary work
13 The apphcant shall deed to Spokane County nght of way to equal 56 feet from
centerluie on Sullivan Avenue and shall construct an additional traffic lane along
Sulhvan Road from Euchd Avenue northward to the proposed north property
11/94 HEC S taff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 14
r
,
boundary unth appropnate taper Phasuig of the construcuon shall be based on
impact from the proposed rez,one to Sullivan Road
14 A nununum 20 foot wide easement shall be provided along the east side of Sulhvan
Road. The purpose of the easement is to accommodate pathways, landscaping and
drainage from roadways
15 A pathway accessible to the pubhc shall be constructed along Sullivan Roa.d. The
pathway is to be located wnttun the common pathway, drainage and landscape
easement area Spokane County shall be granted the nght to enter the easement for
the purpose of drywell and sign maintenance Snow removal from the pubhc
r+oadway shall be pernutted wnthul the easement Maintenance of pathways,
drainage swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsiblhty of the apphcant
16 The apphcant shall at time of each bwlduig permit apphcatlon provide a traffic
analysis that reviews the unpact of the proposal to the north ramps of Sullhvan Road
and Trent Avenue If signal warrants are met the applicant shall be responsible for
the design~purchase of equipment and construcaon of the signal pnor to issuance of
the buflding pernut
17 The apphcant shall construct a nght turn lane on east bound off ramp at Trent and
Sullivan This turn lane shall be constructed to Washuigton State Department of
Transportaaon standards
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 Any water senice for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended..
2 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place theu
name(s) on a pelation for the formation of ULID by pention method pursuant to
RCW 36 94, wluch pennon includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to
object by the sigrung of a protest pedtion agauist the formation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the owner(s)'
property PROVIDED, ttus condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
unprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petinon or resolunon under RCW Chapter 36 94
3 Apphcant shall make connecnon to Pubhc Sewer System Sewer Connection
Pernut is required
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utiliaes, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing pubhc water supply when approved by the
Regional EngYneer (Spokane), State Department of Health
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 15
.
~
4 ` 4 A pubhc sewer system will be made available Use of inciividual on-site sewage
disposal systems shall not be authonzed
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1 The apphcant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earhest possible stage
of design/development in order to be uiformed of code requirements
a.dmmistered/enforced by the department, e g, State Budduig Code Act regulanons
such as requuements for exiting, construction type, occupancy classification, fire
hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, accessibilrty, energy code regulations,
and general coordination wnth other aspects of project implementation
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All air pollution regulations must be met
2 Air polluaon regulaaons requue that dust emissions dunrig demohtion, construction
and excavaaon projects be controlled T'his may reqiure use of water sprays, tarps,
sprmklers or suspension of acttvity dunrig certaui weather condiaons Haul roads
should be treated, and errussions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be
controlled, as well as enussions from all other construction-related acaviaes
3 SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e, ingress, egress,
parkulg areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to nuninuze dust enussions
4 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaveti
surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken umedhately to clean these surfaces
5 SCAPCA Regulation I, Amcle V, requires that a Nonce of Construction and
Apphcation for Approval be subrrutted to and approved by our Agency pnor to the
construction, installation or estabhshment of air pollution source This mcludes any
fuel fired equipment rated at greater than 400,000 BTU/hour (boilers, hot water
heaters, ovens, etc ) It also includes gasoline stations, dry cleaners, and other
sources of air conta.mmants
6 Debns generated as a result of this project must be d.isposed of by means other than
burning (i e, construction waste, etc )
11/94 HEC Staff Report for ZE-41-94 Page 16
,
L~ y OFF1CE OF TNE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOk,ANE COUNTY, WA51-i I NGTON
November 7y 1994
To: SpoE anP CiDunty Planninq Department (Current Planninq
Admi r7ist rator )
From: apoEfane County Enqineer's Department q4"Pk
Subject: Condita.ons of Approval Zone Change No: ZE_41-94
Applic~.~nts Name Pent-er_De_v_._Corp=
Sec t ion 1, Townsh i ptV, MRange 44 EWM
reM_Z~,~~ning
The followinq "Conditicins cif Approval" for the above referenced zone
chanqe ar~ subma.tted to the 5pokane County Hearinq Examiner Comma.ttee
for inclusi~-~n in the "Planning Report" and "Fx.ndinqs and Order" for
thPpia b 1 i c hear i ng s c h ed i-t1 pd Nov e m lae r_ 17, 1994.
C36A Pri-Dr to issuance of a buildinq per(nx.t or at tl-ie request of the
County EriqinePr in con)unction wxth a County Road ProJect/Road
Improvement Distra.ct, wha.chever action comes first:
E ;7 Applicant sFiall dedicate 6 _feEt_or_an_amount_to_eg~,~~al_~G_feet
fram_centPrlxne on Sul _ livai-i_RoadNfor~riqht of way and slope
easementr a5 necessaryo
Prior to release of a bui lda.nq permit or use of the property as
proposed:
F40 Access permits for approache~ to the County Road 5ystem sha11 be
obtained from thP County Enqineero
E4 3 Appl i cant aha11 subma.t for approva1 by the Spokane County
Enqiiieer road, drainaqe and acce5s plans.
E45 A parE inq plan and traffa.c circulatic-n plan shall be submittEd
and ~.~pproved by {:he ~potane County Fnqirieer. The ciesignq
locatin-n ar►d arrangement of partinq staX 1s stial l be in
accordancP wa.th standard enqirieering pr~~cticPS. Paviriq or
surfaeinq as approved by the County Enqineer will be required
for any portion of the pro)ect which i~ to be oc:cupieci or
traveleci by vehicles
E48 The construction of the roaclway 3mprovements stateci herein shall
be accompla.rhed as approved by the Spc4ane County Enqineer.
•
P a Q E' r-...
E50 The CoiAnty Engineer has desa.qnated a 5pecia1 Roadway Section
1 1 iv_an_R~~ad which ~.s ad jacent
standard for the improvement of 5u
t~~ tr~e pr~~p~~sed devel~~pmentp Tf~is lwill reqi_tire the addit.i.on of
varyiiiq amounts of aspha1 t aliDnq tr,e frontage of the
development. CLtrbinq and sidewalk/pathway must also be
constructed. w~~w~
ESi All requYred improvements shall conform to the current 5tate of
Wasliington 5tandard SpPCifa.cations fior Road and Bridqe
construction and other applicahle county standard5 and/or
adopted reao1utions pertaininq pertaininq to Road Standards and
5tormwater Manaqement in effect at the date of construction,
un1PSS otherwa.se approvPd by the County Enqineer.
E54 Ac_ces~ to Sulla.van_Road shall bE prohibited untx.l surh time as
specxfir_al lyrauthorxzed by the SpoE ane County Enqineer.
E55 Ft-Dadway standards, typi ca1 roadway sP c t ions and d rai naye p 1an
requirements ~.~re found a.n SpoN ane Board of County Commissa.oners
resolution 80-15921 as amended and are applicable to this
pr oposa1 .
E58 No constr uctit-nn worE is tv be performed within the existinq or
p roposed r i q htiDf way un t i1 a pe r m i t I-tas beei-i iSsLted hy t he
County Eriqineer. All wclrl within the public road riqht cif way zs
subJect to inspectLoi-i and approv~.~l by tl-ie County Engineer.
E59 A1 1 requx.red constructicin wzthin the exa.stinq or prinposed publ i c
riqht of way a.s to be cr-implPted prior to the release cif a
buz ldi nq permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the CULtnty
Engineer t-D c-Dver ti-ie cost uf constructicon ---)r improvements shall
be filed with the County Enqineero
E90 There may exist uti1 a. t ies, ea. ther undPrqround or overhead,
affectx.nq the sLtbject property, includinq priDperty to be
dedicated or set aSide fiDr fL~ture acqiAa.sita.ono Spotane County
~zssumes no financial obl ai.qaticin fi-nr ad )ustments or relocation
reqardxnq these utilities. Applicant s17ould check with the
appl i cable uti 1 ity purveyor and the SpoE,ane Gounty Engineer to
detPrmine whether~ applicant or the utility is responsible for
ad justment or relocation c~~~ts and tco matfe arranqements for any
npcessary wort.
Special Conditions:
paqe 3
The appl.icai-it shall deed to Spokane County riqht of way to equal Sb
feet from centerl ine on Su1 1 Yvan Avenue and shal 1 constrLtCt ari
additional traffic lane alonq 5i_illivan Road from Eiaclid Avenue
nortl-iward to tfie proposed north property boundary with appropriate
taper. Pha5a.nq of the constrijctiiDn shal l be bssed on impact from the
pr-Dposed re.-one to Sullivan Roadd
A minimum 20 foot wide easement shall be prcivided alanq the east side
of Sullivan Road. The purpose vf the easement x.s to accomadate
pathways, land scalDing and drainage from ro2dways.
A pathway accessa.ble to the public shall be constructed alonq
Sullivan Road. The pathway is to be located within tfie common
pathway, draa.naqe and 1andscape easement areao SpoE ane COLtnty shal l
be qranted the ra.qht to enter the easement for the purpose of drywell
and siqn marntenance. Snow removal from the pLtblx.c r~~adway shall he
permitted withii-i the easement. Maintenanre of pathways, drainaqe
swales and landscapinq areas shall be the reponsibilx.ty of the
app 1 x cant o
The applicant shall at time of each bua.ldinq permit applx.cation
13rova.de a tr~.~ffic analysis that reviews the a.mpact of the proposal to
the north ramps of SLt1livan Road and "frent Avenuea If siqnal
warraiits are met tl-ie applicant shall he responsible for the desiqn
purchase of equipment and constrLtcticin of the siqnal prior to
issiAance of the building permitp
The applicant shall construct a riqht turn lane on east bound off
ramp at Trent and 5uil.ivan. This turn lane shall be constructed to
Washinqtcin State Department of Transportation standards.
OFFICF vF THE COUNTY EhIGTNEER
SI't]k ANE COUNTY, WASN I IVGTOIV
SEptember 7, 1954
To: 5pokane County Rlanninq DepartmPnt (Current I'lanniny
Administrator )
Fri--)m: SpoE;ane County Enqineer's Department Q"T tk
Sub)ect: Condltions of Approval Zone Ctianqe Na:Unassigned
App1 i cants Name Pent: er_Dev . _Corp~
Se c t a.on 1, Townshipr'5~N, rRanqe 44 EWM
rey_Z~~,~ning
"fhe fol lowing "Gonditirins of Appr-Dvc-i1" for the above referenced :One
c hange are submit ted to t he Spot. ane County P 1anni nq Depar tment for
Znclusson in the Desiqn Review Meetinq schPduled SPptPmtaer_7, 1JJ4»
E36A Prior to i~suance of a building permit ---)r at the reqiaest of the
CoLtnty Engineer iri con,7unctlon with a COLtnty Ftoad Pro)ect/Road
Improvemeiit District9 whichever actx.on comes first:
E37 Appl i cant shal 1 dedicate 6 _feet_or_an_amoLtnt~to_e9221_~6_feet
firom_center 1 xne cin Sul _ 1 ivan_Road~forrriqht ofi~way and s1cipe
EaSements ss necessaryn
f'rior t-D release ijf a buildinq permit or Ltse of the property as
proposed:
E40 Access permits for apprc-aches to the CoLtnty Road System sha11 be
obtaa.neci from the County Engineere
E43 Appl icant srial 1 si_tbmit for approval by thE SpoE.ane County
Enqineer r-Dad, drainaye and access plansw
E45 Aparta.ng plan and traf f i c cir culaticin plan sriai l be submitted
and approveci by the Spr-Itfane C~iunty EnUa.neer. The desicln,
1ocation and arranqement of parE ing stal ls shal. 1 be in
acccirdance with standard enqineerinq practices. Pava.nq or
sur fa c i nq as approved by t he County Fnqi neer wi 1 1 be required
foDr any port~iDn of the pro)ert which ir to be occupied or
travPlPCi by vehicles
E48 The constrttctis-nn of the roadway improvements stated herein shal
be accomplished as approved by the SpiDE,ane Gounty Enqiiieer.
i
Y~ ( Z~-~ L l
t
pa Q2
E50 The Coitnty Engineer ha5 desiqnated a Special Roadway Sectirin
standard for the improvement of Su11ivari_R~,~~ad wtiich ia adjacent
to the proposed developmente Thx.s will~require tMe addita.on of
varyiny am-Dunts ofi asphalt al-Dng the froi-itaqe of the
deve7 opment. Curbi nq cind cidewal a/gattway must a15o be
constructed.
E51 A11 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washinqton Standard Specifx.catir--ns for Rciad and Bridqe
construction and other applieable county standards anci/or
adopl:ed resolutions pertaa.ninq pertaina.nq t-D Road Standards and
St~-.rmwater Manaqement Zn effect at the date of constructicin, -
+Anless otherwise 4approved by the County Enqineer.
E54 Access to Sullivan_Road shall be prohibitecl uritil such time as
specifical ly~authori-zed by the SpoE ane County Enqineero
~55 Roadway si:andards, typicaI roadway sectx.ons and drainaqe plan
requirements are found in Spr-iE ane Esoard of C-Di_tnty Commissx.cnners
resolutieDn 80-159' as amended and are applicable to this
pYnpos~.~1.
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existinq c-r
pr~~~poseti r a. qh tof way unt i l. a permi t has been issued by the
County Enqineeru All worE within the pLtblic road riyht of way is
suhaect to inspectir-on ~.~nd appriDval by the County Enqineer.
E59 All requx.recl constrLtctir-in within the existx.nq or proposed pLtkalic
r i q htof way x s to be com p1 eted p r ior tiD t he r e 1 ease of a
lauildinq permit or a bond iri an amount estimated by the County
Eiiqineer to cover tI-ie cost of construction or improvements shal 1
be filed ws.th the County Enqineer.
E3O There may exist utila.ties, either i_tnderqround or overhead,
affectinq the subjPCt pr-Dperty, includinq pr-Dperty to be
dedicated or set aCid~ for f~~tture acqialsitlcin. SpoE,ane County
assumes na financial oblig~.~tir-in fir-ir adji_«tments or relocation
regardinq these utila.ties. Applicant should che6 with the
applicable utility pLtrveyor and the SpoE ane County Enqineer to
determine wnether applicant or the utila.ty Ls rP~ponsible for
ad,7ustment or relocation cr-ists and to makE arranqement5 for any
necessary worEti.
Special Conclitionsa
~ ( •
paqe 3
The appl i cant shall deed to 5poE ane County riqht of way to equal 56
, feet from centErline on Sullivan Aveni_te and shall construct an
addition~.al trafific lane al-.:inq Sullivan Road from ELtclid Aveni_te
northward to the pr~~~posed rnorth property bounclary with appropriate
taper.
A ma.nimum 20 f~iot wide easement shall be provided a1onq the east side
of Sulla.van Road. The pi_trpose cif the easement is to accomadate
pathways, landsrapinq and drainaqe from riradways.
A pathway accessible to the public shall be constri_icted alonq
Sullivan Road4 The pathway is to be 1ocated within the common
pathway, draa.naqe and landscape easement area. Spok,ane Gounty sfial l
be granted the riqht to enter the easement fiDr the pLtrpose of drywell
and sa.qn maintenance. Srnow rem-Dval from the public r-Dadway shall bP
permitted withiri the easement. Maintenance ~af pathwaysr drainaqe
swales anci landscapinq areas shall be the reponsibila.ty ~--)f tl-ie
applicant.
RECEIVED
l v~
SEp 2 L1 1994
~
Washirogton State Eas#ern Regeor
V ~ Department of Yransportafi~RNE ~N~ ~~'A 2714 Rl Mayfair Street
Spokane WA 99207 2090
Sid Morrison
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324 6000
September 19, 1994
Mr Tom Veljic
Spokane County Plaruvng
West 1026 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re Industnal Park Zone Reclass
Dear Tom,
Thank you for the opporturuty to comment on the above development The Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) along with County Engineers have received a traffic
study conducted by Taylor Engineenng for the above proposal After a preliminary review of
this traffic study we would ask that the following concerns be addressed pnor to a SEPA
deternunation being made for the project If these concerns are not addressed it would be
probable that impacts would occur to the transportation system that have not been rrutigated
We base the above statement on the following
• The traffic study makes the companson that if the site were to be built out applymg the
existing zonuig it would produce 18,058 tnps per day, wlvle the rezone would produce
25,614 tnps per day and that tius difference is not sigruficant The concern we have wlth
this companson is that it makes the assumption that no mitigation would be required to
build the industnal areas, and since the traffic produced by the rezone is not significantly
different, it would also not warrant rrutigation In checlang with you and the County
Engrneers, we can find no record of a valid SEPA checklist being prepared for the
proposed industnal areas Based on existmg Industnal Park development it would seem
lilcely that a SEPA would be required for any substantial construction on this slte Under
SEPA, as in ttus case, WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers could request that the
traffic unpacts of the proposea development be addressed For this reason we feel thC
present traffic study, as submitted, does not adequately address the impacts of this
proposed development We would request that tlus traffic study be modified to show a
"no build option" and a"budd option"
• Thus traffic study apparently analyzed the intersection of Trent Avenue and Sullivan as it is
shown in the intersection diagram, however no level of sernce analysis is enclosed for ttus
intersection A level of service analysis needs to be enclosed for this intersection
• It would appear from the site plan submitted that some of the land uses mentioned for the
shopping center, such as the home improvement store, are not typical shopping center
uses A discussion of the proposed land uses for this shopping center needs to be included
in the traffic study to insure that a shopping center is the "best fit" category for this
proposed development
1
Mr Veljic
September 19, 1994
Page 2
Based on the existtng traffic study and the above comments rt would appear that development
of tlus srte would have probable sigruficant impacts on the transportation facihties in the
viciruty of t}us site The present traffic study identifies the fact that SulLvan Road presently
accommodates between 16,700 and 25,614 ve}ucles per day Build out of tlvs proposed
shopping center alone would produce an estimated 18,000 additional (new) tnps to the local
roadway system, according to the traffic study Due to the magmtude of this development
and the tnp generation potential, WSDOT requests that our above concerns be addressed in a
revised traffYC study pnor to a SEPA determination being made, to insure that the probable
unpacts th.ts development vvill generate are adequately mitigated
If you have any questions regarding the above please feel free to contact Leonard Cash in our
Regional Plan.rung Office at (509) 324-6199
Sincerely,
J C LENZI
Regional Admunistrator
By LEONARD CASH, PE
Regional Planrung Engineer
7CL
LCC/gjf
cc
Tom Davis, Spokane County Buildtng Department
:k
~rx c~~rx c-- +e~ 3--- irx g r ~ ~
~ X lp * s LZA RC) PC) Sm I] R~z C) x m
1994 Traf fic Study SuppI ement
AA?[ E M0 R A N D U M
October 31, 199i
TO• Greg Figg
FROM, Jim
RE. Adrlitiana 1 Capacity Analgses
As per yaur requests, please find attached a capy of the
additionaT capacity analyses It is haped the inf vrmatian
adequately addresses your concerns If issues / concerns were
missed, misunderstoad, or overlooked, or if any vf the analyses
appear inappropriatet please notify us at yaur earliest
convenience Thank yvu f or your cooperation in this matter,
Taylor Eagineering fInc. Traff3c Study SupPlerrent
Sa Is P■ "S FE)POSED FMCINE 1 OC tQber 31, 1994f Me]Drandi.lm
. ,
Tayl or ErZgirx eering , =ri.c _
S I P' s P RO P O S E D R E Z ON E
9
1994 Traffic Study Supplement
October 31, 1994
STATEMENT of PURPOSE
The purpose of this supplement is to summarize capacity
analyses at the intersection of the Trent ramps at Sullivan Road
for existing conditions and future conditions with the proposed
rezone In addition, capacity analyses were performed for the
year 2000 "No-Build" conditions for signalized intersections
These analyses were performed in response to the Washington State
Department of Transportation's (W.S D 0 T.) requirements.
TRENT RAMPS & SIILLIVAN ROAD
The following are summary comparisons of the capacity
analyses performed for existing -vs- "Build" conditions at the
intersections of the Trent ramps at Sullivan Road (Attachment
"CA" contains the actual output of HCS85):
1994 Trent Wb Ramps & Stiil l ivan Road 2000 Trent Wb Rarqps & 5u11 ivan w/ Rezone
(Unsignalized) (Unsignalized)
RESERVE RF.sFRvE
MaVIIHMS CAPACITY LOS MOVEMENTS CAPACITY LOS
All Westbownd Movemelts -358 F AI1 Westbound Movements -578 F
Northbound Lef ts 529 A Northbauuzd Lef ts 125 D
1994 Trent Fb Rarips & Sullivan Road 2000 Trent ffi Ramps & S.il l van w/ Rezme
(Umignalized (Unsignalizedi
RESEIWE RESERW
MOVEMEMS CAPACITY LOS MaV]QMENTS CAPACITY LOS
All Eastbotmd Movements -286 F All Eastbound Movenients -536 F
Southboim,d Lefts 143 D Southboiuvd Lefts 31 E
Reserve Capacity = Vehicles ~er Hour
400 vph or more LOS A"
300 to 399 vph IAS "B"
200 to 299 vph IAS "C"
100 to 199 vph LOS "D"
0 to 99 vph LAS "E"
Less than 0 vKO:)Uclh LOS "F'•
NO►I'E. HCI~t85's procedures ar based oan .move~ments and right turns otn the
major street (Sullivan~} being un~eded.
Whereas the capacity analyses indicate unacceptable levels-
of-service at the intersections, field surveys indicated the only
significant queues occur for the northbound lefts at the
westbound ramps. The queues were observed to occur due to the
platooning from Kiernan It should also be emphasized the
Ievels-of-service for minor movements are estimated to be
unacceptable with esisting conditions
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc Traffic Study Supplesnesit
S. I. P. 's PIa0P0.Sm REI.GYRE 1 October, 1994
"NO-BIIILD" CONDITIONS
The following summarizes the 2000 projections for "No-Build"
conditions at intersections along Sullivan Road•
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Kiernan 2000 No-Build
NORTH LEG P.M. Peak Hour
Total Approaching19 968
Lef t Turns 1
Throughs 824
Right Turns 25
Total Exiting 1,290
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 102 Total Approaching 455
Lef t Turns 14 Lef t Turns 17 6
Throughs 1 Throughs 5
Right Turns 87 Right Turns 274
Total Exiting 117 Total Exiting 174
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 1,143
Left Turns 87
Throughs 1,002
Right Turns 54
Total Exiting 1,087
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 2,668
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 21668
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Euclid 2000 No-Build
1VORTH LEG P.M Peak Hour
Total Approaching 1,087
Left Turns 45
Throughs 1,030
Right Turns 12
Total Exiting 1 144
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 411 Total Approaching 618
Left Turns 74 Left Turns 464
Throughs 27 Throughs 15
Right Turns 310 Right Turns 139
Total Exiting 138 Total Exiting 224
SOUTH LEG
Total Approachingll 1,194
Left Turns 1
Throughs 931
Right Turns 152
Total Exiting 1,804
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,310
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,310
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 No-Build
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
TLeft TuPnsaching O 2,198
Throughs 1,487
Right Turns 711
Total Exiting 1 372
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 550
Left Turns 0 Left Turns 450
Throughs 0 Throughs 2
Right Turns 0 Right Turns 98
Total Exiting 1,243 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching30 1,804
Turns 1,274
Right Turns 0
Total Exiting 11937
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 4,552
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 4,552
TayIor E7igineering, Inc. Traffic Study S~,tppl esnetlt
S. I. P. 's Pl~OP0~5~ RFZCINE 2 October, 1994
~
'<<f ~ • L
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 No-Build
NORTH LEG P.M. Peak Hour
1,937
Total ApproachinY88
~ Lef t Turns '
Th
roughs 1,749
TotaltExiting ~ 1,804
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1,651 Total Approachin 0
Lef t Turns 2 62 Lef t Turns g0
Throughs 0 Throughs 0
Right Turns 1,389 Right Turns 0
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 828
Total Approaching 2,182
Throughsns 1,542
Right Turns 640
Total Exiting 3,138
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 5,770
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 5,770
The following are summary comparisons of the capacity
analyses performed for "No-Build" and "Build" (l.e., with the
proposed rezone) conditions at intersections along Sullivan Road
(Attachment "CA" contains the actual output of HCS85)
2000 "fiio-Build" Sullivan & Kteriian 2000 "Build" Stiillivan & Rterran
(signalized) (signalized)
DELAY DEGAY
MOVEMMS (in secs) LOS MOVEKENTS (in secs) LOS
All Eastbound Movesnents 11.1 B All Eastbotund Movesments 12.2 B
Westbound Lefts 14.3 B Westbound Lefts 17.4 C
Westbound Thrus & Rights 12.7 B Westbound Z'hrus & Ittghts 16.0 C
NorthboLUrd Lefts 17.1 C Northbotmd Lefts 15 6 C
Northbound T'hrus & Rights 11.1 B Northbotmd Thrus & Rights 11.5 B
Southbotmd Lef ts 18.3 C Southbotuld Lef ts 18.6 C
Southbownd Thrus S Rights 8.1 B Southbotuzd nnis & Rights 8 1 B
Intersection Delay = 14.9 (sec/veh) Intersectioai Delay = 11.9 (secfveh)
Intersection IAS = B Intersection LOS = B
2000 "No-Build" Sullivan &E,iclid 2000 "BLUld" Sullivan & Euclid
(Signalized) (Signalized)
DELAY DELAY
MOVEKENTS (in secs) LOS MOVEHMS (in secs) LOS
All Eastbotun,d Movemeits 8.1 B All Eastbotmd Movsnetits 8.3 B
Westbound Lefts 32.0 D Westbound Lefts 32.5 D
Westbound T'hnus 5.9 B Westbound Thrus 5.9 B
Westbound Rlghts 6.3 B Westbound Rights 6.3 B
NorttiboLULd Lefts 15.5 C Northbotmd Lefts 17.8 C
NorthboLm,d Thrus 7.4 B NorthboLm,d Thrus 7.6 B
Northboim,d Rights 4.6 A Northbound Rights 4.6 A
SouthboLUyd Lefts 8.1 B Southbound Lefts 8.1 B
Southboim,d ThnLs & Rights 8.2 B Sauthbouuid Thrus & Rights 8.5 B
Intersectioan Delay = 11.4 (sec/veh) Intersectim Delay = 11.7 (sec/veh)
Intersectioan IAS = B Intersectim LOS = B
Taylor Fngineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement
S. I.P. 's PRDPOSM REZCtIE 3 October, 1994
~
' •
2000 "No-Bu11d" Su-llivan & Wb I-90 Ranps 2000 "Build" Sullivan & Wb I-90 Ramps
(Signalized) (Signalized)
~ ,
Ltai.Al 1/~LA.i
MOVEHMS (in secs) LOS MOVEHENTS (in secs) LOS
Westbotuyd Lefts 23.6 C Westboimd Lefts 23.6 C
Westbotund Lefts &Thrus 20.1 C WestboLmd Lefts & T'hrus 20.1 C
Westbound Rights 1.4 A Westbotuid Itights 2.4 A
Northboumd Lefts 62.6 F Northbound Lefts 62.6 F
Northbound Thrus 4.7 A NorthboLmd Thrus 4.8 A
Sauthboun,d Thrus 33 8 D Southbound Thrus 37.5 D
southboumd Rights 12.9 B southbotmd Riqhts 13.2 B
Intersectim Delay = 24.8 (sec/veh) Intersection Delay = 26.0 (sec/veh)
Intersectiom LOS = C Intersectiaan LOS = D
2000 "No-Bu11d" S,illivan & Eb I-90 Raanps 2000 "Bw.ld" S.illivan & Eb I-30 Ramps
(Sign,alized) (Signalized)
DELAY DEI.AY
MOVEKENTS (in secs) LOS MOVEMENTS (in secs) LOS
Eastbouavd Lefts 15.8 C Eastbolm+d Lefts 15.8 C
EastboLnd Thrus & Rights 31.8 D Eastbotmd Thrus S Rights 31.8 D
Eastbaiuld Rights 31.2 D Eastboumd Riqhts 31.2 D
Northbotmd Thrus 9.9 B Northbotm,d ThnLS 10.1 B
Northbouvd Rights 4.9 A NorthhouLd Rights 4.9 A
Southboun,d Lefts 105.3 F Southbownd Lefts 113.5 F
Southboimd Thnas 16.0 C Southboimd Thrus 17.2 C
Intersectim Delay = 19.3 (sec/veh) Intersection Delay = 20.1 (sec/veh)
Intersectian LOS = C Intersectian LOS = C
Delay = Stopped Delay per Vehicle
5 sec or less LOS "A"
5 1 to 15.0 sec LOS "B"
15.1 to 25 0 sec LOS "C"
25.1 to 40.0 sec LOS "D"
401to600sec->LOS"E"
Over 60 sec LOS "F"
As indicated in the foregoing exhibit, the only intersection
where the overall level-of-service changes is the westbound I-90
ramps and Sullivan Road However, that intersection goes from a
good LOS "D" (26.0 sec/veh delay) to a poor LOS "C" (24.8
sec/veh) the threshold for LOS "D" is 25.0 sec/veh.
Similarly, some individual movements change when their "measures
of effectiveness" are close to the threshold (e g, the westbound
lefts at Sullivan and Kiernan goes from LOS "B", 14.3 sec/veh, to
LOS "C", 17.4 sec/veh, with the threshold being 15 0 sec/veh).
Taylor Fngineering, Inc. Traftic Study Supplement
S. I. P. 's P~Pi0~5'~ REZM 4 October, 1994
V!
~ W
U
.
a
~
Hz
z~
w
-
xH
~N
C)
_ E+ 9
Ha
~
r a .
Tay1 ar Engin4a!ering , Inc _
S I P' s PR O P O S E D R E Z ON E
, CAPACITY ANALYSES
INTRODIICTION/OVERVIEW
The standard process for determining operating conditions
estimate "levels-of-service (LOS's)"111. The "ideal" capacity~f
a typical roadway is 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph) per lane 2
~
The worst congestion on roadways occurs at intersections where
competing traffic flows (e g, left turns -vs- opposing
movements, etc.) "share" the roadway's capacity
Capacity analyses were performed using the "1985 Highway
Capacity Software (HCS85)", computerized implementation of the
procedures and parameters contained in the Transportation
Research Board's (TRB) 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: Special
Report 209 (HCM85). Capacity analyses were performed for the
1993 "design hour volumes" with the proposed project for the
following intersections:
The remainder of this attachment is the summary output of
HCS85.
"The concept of 'levels-of-service' is defined as a
qualitative measure describing operational conditions within
a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or
passengers. A leveI -of -service (LOS) definition generally
describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed
and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions,
comfort and convenience, and safety Six Ievels-of-service
are defined They are given letter designations, from 'A'
to 'F', with LOS 'A' representing the best operating
conditions and LOS 'F' the worst." --HIGHWAY CAPACITY
MANUAL SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D. C. (August, 1985)
[21 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL' SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D. C. (August, 1985).
Taylor EYiqineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplennent
S. I. P. 's RFZGYIE 2 At tachment "C,A"
~
1994 Traffic Study Supplement
1985 HCM. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAR HOUR FACTOR .95
AREA POPULATION 300000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Trent Wb Ramps
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Sullivan
NAME OF THE ANALYST TEI
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (nun/dd/yy)...... 10-29-1994
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED P.M. Peak Hour
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1994 Existinq Conditions
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE. 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0
EB WB NB SB
LEFT 0 207 513 0
THRU 0 0 329 324
RIGHT 1[1] 287 0 23
[1] HCS 85 requires at least one movement for each leg at 4 leg I/S
NIIMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB WB NB SB
LANES 1 1 2 2
LANE USAGE LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None)
VEHICLE COMPOSITION (Default Factor = 1.22)
CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2)
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) cp(pcph) cM(pcph) cSH(pcph) cR= csg- v LOS
MINOR STREET
WB LEFT 214 158 70 > 70 > -144 > F
THROUGH 0 192 85 > 152 85 >-358 85 >F E
RIGHT 296 1000 1000 > 1000 > 704 > A
MAJOR STREET
SB LEFT 0 846 846 846 846 A
NB LEFT 529 828 828 828 299 C
Taylor Ehgineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement
S.I.P. 's PROP0.M) F!FZONE 3 Attachment "CA"
~
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR........ .95
AREA POPULATION........ 300000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Trent Eb Ramps
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Sullivan
NAME OF THE ANALYST TEI
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 10-29-1994
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED P.M. Peak Hour
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1994 Existing Conditions
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL '
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/S4UTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND• STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE WESTBOIIND. STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB WB NB SB
LEFT 100 0 0 160
THRU 0 0 742 371
RIGHT 369 1[1] 399 0
[1] HCS 85 requires at least one movement for each leg at 4 leg I/S
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB WB NB SB
LANES 1 1 2 2
LANE USAGE LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None)
VEHICLE COMPOSITION (Default Factor = 1.22)
CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2)
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) cP(pcph) cM(pcph) __cSH(pcph) _ _cR__cSg__v _ LOS
_
MINOR STREET
EB LEFT 104 95 51 > 51 > -53 > F
THROUGH 0 115 62 > 203 62 >-286 62 >F E
RIGHT 385 1000 1000 > 1000 > 615 > A
MAJOR STREET
SS LEFT 167 310 310 310 143 D
Tayl or F.hgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl enent
S.I.P.'s PFdHUSM RFZGM 4 Attachrrr-nt "CA"
1985 HCM: ONSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RQNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .95
AREA POPULATION 300000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Trent Wb Ramps
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Sullivan
NAME OF THE ANALYST TEI
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 10-29-1994
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED P.M. Peak Hour
OTHER INFORMATION.... 2000 with Proposed Rezone
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND. STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB WB NB SB
LEFT 0 253 608 0
THRU 0 0 392 401
RIGHT 1[1] 361 0 28
[1] HCS 85 requires at least one movement for each leg at 4 leg I/S
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB WB NB SB
LANES 1 1 2 2
LANE USAGE LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None)
VEHICLE COMPOSITION (Default Factor = 1.22)
CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2)
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) cp(pcph) cj„I(pcph) csg(pcph) cR= csg- v LOS
MINOR STREET
WB LEFT 261 109 24 > 24 > -237 > F
THROUGH 0 134 29 > 55 29 >-578 29 >F E
RIGHT 372 1000 1000 > 1000 > 627 > A
MAJOR STREET
NB LEFT 627 752 752 752 125 D
Tayl or EYigineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl anent
S. I. P. 's PS~O~ REZGY1E 5 At tachrnent "CA"
1985 HCM• UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAR HOUR FACTOR .95
AREA POPIILATION 300000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... Trent Eb Ramps
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... Sullivan
NAME OF THE ANALYST TEI
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 10-29-1994
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED P.M. Peak Hour
OTHER INFORMATION.... 2000 with Proposed Rezone
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLIIMES
EB WB NB SB
LEFT 122 0 0 195
THRU 0 0 878 459
RIGHT 464 1[1] 473 0
[1] HCS 85 requires at least one movement for each leg at 4 leg IfS
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB WB NB SB
LANES 1 1 2 2
LANE USAGE LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None)
VEHICLE COMPOSITION (Default Factor = 1.22)
CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2)
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) cp(pcph) cl,q(pcph) csg(pcph) cR= csg- v LOS
EB LEFT 127 95 16 > 16 > -111 > F
THROUGH 0 115 20 > 75 20 >-536 20 >F E
RIGHT 484 998 998 > 998 > 514 > A
MAJOR STREET
SB LEFT 203 234 234 234 31 E
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplen-elt
S. I.P. 's PROPOSEZ) REZCiNE 6 Attachment "CA"
~ .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) Kiernan (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S&RIERNB.HC9
Area Type: Other 10-30-94 PM Peak
Comment: 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with "No-Build"
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No. Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 14 1 87; 176 5 274; 87 1002 54; 119 824 25
Lane Width ; 12.0 ;12.0 12.0 ;12.0 12.0 ;12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; 29; 91; 18; 8
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * ; NB Lef t *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Riqht *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Riqht ;WB Riqht
Green 15A ;Green 9A 24A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order: $1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c q/c Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1367 365 0.21 0.27 11.1 B 11.1 B
WB L 1602 427 0.43 0.27 14.3 B 13.5 B
TR 1500 400 0.49 0.27 12.7 B
NB L 1624 271 0.34 0.17 17.1 C 11.6 B
TR 3405 1419 0.81 0.42 11.1 B
SB L 1624 271 0.46 0.17 18.1 C 9.3 B
TR 3410 1421 0.65 0.42 8.1 B
Intersection Delay = 10.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ernent
S. I. P. 's PlaOFOSM RF.l.CINE 7 At tachment "CA"
~ f. . ~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) Euclid (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S&EIICLNB.HC9
Area Type: Other 10-30-94 PM Peak
Comment: 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with "No-Build"
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
~
No . Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 1 ; 1 2 1 ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 74 27 310; 464 15 139; 111 931 152; 48 1030 18
Lane Width ; 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; 103; 47; 51; 6
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ; NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Riqht *
Peds Peds *
WB Lef t * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Riqht
SB Riqht ;WB Riqht
Green 26A ;Green 26A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order• #1 $5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adi Sat v/c g/c Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1408 634 0.51 0.45 8.1 B 8.1 B
WB L 1143 514 0.95 0.45 32.0 D 27.1 D
T 1755 790 0.02 0.45 5.9 B
R 1492 671 0.14 0.45 6.3 B
NB L 397 179 0.65 0.45 15.5 C 7.9 B
T 3510 1580 0.65 0.45 7.4 B
R 1492 671 0.16 0.45 4.6 A
SB L 405 182 0.28 0.45 8.1 B 8.2 B
TR 3505 1577 0.73 0.45 8.2 B
Intersection Delay = 11.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Tayl or Eriqineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl ement
S. I.P. 's PFMOSW RFZGM 8 Attachmnt "C,A"
• _
C HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) I-90 North (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S&I90NNB.HC9
Area Type: Other 10-30-94 PM Peak
Comment: 2005 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with "No-Build"
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No . Lanes 1 > 1 1 ; 2 2 ; 2 1
Volumes 450 2 98; 530 1274 ; 1487 711
Lane Width ; ;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 ; 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; ; 33; 0; 234
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left ; NB Left *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right * *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left * ; SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Riqht *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Riqht
SB Riqht ;WB Right *
Green 23A ;Green 15A 40A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 $5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c q/c Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB L 1492 398 0.60 0.27 23.6 C 19.4 C
LT 1494 398 0.60 0.27 20.1 C
R 1492 1078 0.06 0.72 2.4 A
NB L 3229 574 1.02 0.18 62.6 F 21.8 C
T 3510 2340 0.60 0.67 4.7 A
SB T 3510 1599 1.03 0.46 33.8 D 28.9 D
R 1492 680 0.74 0.46 12.9 B
Intersection Delay = 24.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
Tayl or Engineering, Inc. Traffic Study Suppl enent
S. I. P. 's PRQP00.SID RF1.(INE 9 At tachmeilt "CA"
A r
♦ «
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
f Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) I-90 South (N-S) Sullivan
` Analyst: TEI File Name: S&I90SNB.HC9
Area Type: Other 10-30-94 PM Peak
Comment: 2000 Directional Desiqn Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with "No-Build"
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
~
~ ~
No. Lanes ; 1 1 < 1 2 1 ; 2 2
Volumes ; 262 1 1389; ; 1542 640; 188 1749
Lane Width ;12.0 12.0 12.0; ; 12.0 12.01112.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; 463; ; 213; 0
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * ; NB Lef t
Thru Thru *
Right Riqht *
Peds Peds *
WB Left ; SB Left *
Thru ; Thru *
Right ; Riqht
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Riqht ;WB Riqht
Green 25A ;Green 42A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0
Cycle Length: 75 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adi Sat v/c g/c Approach.
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 1492 517 0.53 0.35 15.8 C 28.1 D
TR 1492 517 0.95 0.35 31.8 D
R 1492 517 0.94 0.35 31.2 D
NB T 3510 2012 0.85 0.57 9.9 B 8.8 B
R 1492 855 0.53 0.57 4.9 A
SB L 328 188 1.11 0.57 105.3 F 24.7 C
T 3510 2012 0.96 0.57 16.0 C
Intersection Delay = 19.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study Supplement
S. I. P. 's P~OP~OtS'~ RElCiRE 10 At tachrnent "CA"
!
S a Y
t 4' i * 717 dY'1 Vt J:!:Z1y1.XtC=2~L .'1.i1W r 1Z1C ~
S X F ' Am 3P R4C> 3P 4=0 S~n n = X OWE
1994 Traffic StudY Su plement # 2
Novembpr 4, 19~4
BTATEKENT of PURP03E
The purpose of this supplement is to summarize capacity
analyses at the intersection of the Trent tamps at Sullivan Road
for future conditions with the proposed rezone. in addition, the
analyses of the intersections of the I-90 ramps and Sullivan Were
redone to assure all movemants had LOS "D" or botter (paqea 4 and
5 of Attachment "CA", Rovision # 3, contains the revieed capacity
analyses). These analyses Were performed in response to the
Waah1 nnt nn RtatA flAnartmant nf Tranannr~ ~ nr+ • c lLT c T1 f1 T 1
.ar ti.~rs.., .
TRENT RAKPS b SIILLIVAPi R0AD
The foI l owing is a summary of the capacity anal yses
petformed for "Build" conditions at the intersection of the
Westbound ratnp from Trent at Sullivan Road aq a Signalizpd inter-
section (Attachment "CA", Revision ~ 3, contains thp actiiAl
output of HCS85):
2000 "Build" Sullivan 8 Wb Trent Ramp
(Siqnalized)
DELAY
MOVEMFNTS (fn secs) LOS
rr r--rr -rrr...
Westbound Lts, Thtus, b Rts 21.3 C
Northbound Lefts 6 Thr~jr. 77_14 r.
Southbound Thrus b Rights 30.6 D
Intersectfon ve}.ay = 23.9 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS n C
rr rr~~---w-- rWwmmw~~----r ~Mm~ --ir --r-----
Delay = Stopped Delay per Vehicle
5 sec os less LOS "A"
5.1 to 15.0 sec LOS "8"
15.1 to 25.0 sec LOS "C"
25.1 to 40.0 sec LOS "D"
dn _ 1 t A fiA fl mAn ~ T AC nF"
- - - ~ - - - - -
To analypP npprations at the eastbound ramps and Sullivan
Road, numerous iterations indicated the ramps could maintain
adequate levels-of-service with the proposed rezone wf thout
signalization if an additiona2 lane is provided. The analyses
were based on procedures described in Appendix I(of Chapter 10)
of the 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANVAL (Attachment "CA", Revssion #
3, contains the actual output of HCB85) wfth the assumption aIl
Tayl or Fngineeting, Inc. Traff-tc Study Syppl ement
S. I. P. 's la1= 1 Novenber, 1994
- - - - - - _ r _ _ -
NOV-07-94 MON 06:36 AM P.03
.
. ,
eastbound movements occur during the northbound only phase at the
veatbound ramps. The followinq is a summarr (Attachment "CA",
Reviaion # 3, conteins the actual output of HCS85).
~
1994 Trent Bb Ramps b Sullfvan Road
(Unsfqnal i zed)
~1
R£sERVE
MOVEMENTS CAPACITY LOS
Eastbcund Lefts 169 D
Eastbound Rights 228 C
Reserve Capacity = Vehicles per Hour
400 vph or more LOS "A"
300 to 399 vph LOS "8"
200 to 299 vph LOS "C"
100 to 199 vph Los "D"
0 to 99 vph LOS "E"
Less than 0 vph LOS "F•'
NOTfi: KCM85's procPdiirQs are based on
through movements and riqht turns
on the major street (Sullfvan)
beinq unimpeded.
As indicated by the foregoinq analyses, the intersections
maintain adequate levels-of-service with the signalization of the
westbound ramps and the addition of ar► eastbound lane on the ramp
from Trent Avenue. These analyses are based on year 2005 with
the rezone traffic pro3ections.
However, it should be noted the Washinqton Department of
Trarscportatf o» l.u.s agroed to uL+LinLC Laot YCdjc (1994) COuDtS fOr
the ramps. Phasin9 of the recommended improvements should be
determined based on W.S.D.O T`s latest counts.
Tayl or EhOneering, Inc. Tra f f i c St udy 5upplement
s. I. P. 'a maxam RFmm 2 Novenber, 1994
NOV-07-94 MON 06:37 AM P.04
•
!
t
A'iT TACHME~'r " CA
Rev3..sion # 3
C1RL PAC I TY ANAL LW 93 IE: 0
NOV-07-94 MON 06:37 AM P.05
• .
~
'~'ayl +ar Eragiri*3D o~ r~trx cj ~ ~n.d-, .
S Iip ' s PROPOSED RFZOrY=
CAPACITY ANALYSES
Revision # 3
November 4, 1994
i NTRODucTIoN/ ovERv IEW
The standard process for dete mininq operating conditions
estimate "Ievels-of-service (LOS's)"~11. The "ideal" capacity Qf
a typical roadway is 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph) per Iane`21.
The worst congestion on roadways occuts at intersections where
competinq trafffc flows (e.q., left turns -vs- opposing
movements, etc.) "share" the roadway's capacity.
Capacity analyses were performed using the "1985 Highway
Capacity Software (HC585)", computerized implementation of the
procedures and parameters contained in the Transportation
Research Board's (TRB) 1985 HTGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: Special
Report 209 (HCM85). Capacity analyses were performed for the
1993 "dess.gn hour volumes" with the proposed project for the
following intersections:
The remainder of this attachment fs the summary output of
HCS85.
"The concept of ' I evel s-of-servi ce' is defined as a
qualitatfve measure describing operational conditions within
a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or
passenqers. A Ievel -of -serviLce (LOS) definition generally
describPS thwsw c-nndi ti.ons in terms of such factors as speed
anA t r2t1&1 f' 11T~ fY00I,^lM► 1TenA,~..ns► a v% f- a; . is . w L wvv. 3r 3- w.ss. .
comfos t a►ri3 c,~~~vc~aio~ico, and safety. Six I CVCI `.f-vt-service
are defined. They are given letter designations, from 'A'
to 'F', uith LOS 'A' representing the best operating
conditions and LOS 'F' the worst." --HIGHWAY CAPACYTY
MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation
Recearch Board, Washington, D. C. (August, 1955).
[2] HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation
Research Board, washington, D. C. (August, 1985).
TayI or F.7iQineering, Inc. Traf f i c St udy St~ppl ement
S. I. P. 's P!1 RFl= 1 At tachment "CA"/Revisican No. 3
hlOV-07-94 h1OH 05 :3B AM P• 06-
' s .
AN14LYSIS o# 2005 with BUILDQUT ~ iR$5~~OUNQ RAMP8 SIGPIJLLIZED
RCM• i.iIGllAL#ZED 1NT4rRY.ECT7sON SYMMARY
Center Far Mxcracornputers In Ttansportation
atreets: (E-W) N Trent Ramps (N-S) SuY $ ivan
Analyst TEI File Name: S&TRNTRZ,HC9
Area Type: 8ther 11-4-94 FM Peak
Ciuirament: 2005 Directional Design Haur vodumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Lastbaund ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Sauthbound
i L T R ; L T R i L T 'R i L T R
; a ~
N'v . Lanes > 1 < ; > 2 ; 2 <
Vvlumes 361 1 2531 608 392 ; 441 28
LAl7e Wldth 12•0 ~ 12.0 ~ 12,0
RT~R Vals 1 ~ 8411 oil 9
-i -i i -Y -ra - W fto i i i i iM i -V -N ~ -0 1- -P* -i --r -r ~ ~ ~,J& m w -i i --+si # ~ --i r --r r
SignSl OFerdtiOns
Phase comtainatian I 2 3 4 1 5 f 7 a
EB Left ; NS Left *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right Right
Peds Peds
WR T.pf t ~ ;RR Tnft *
Tkiit u 'tnCu "x
Ped.~ ~ 3 ~ ~@~ht ~
~ P s
NB Right ; Eg Right
$S Right ,W8 Right
Green 4SA ;Green 23A 1OA
Ye1 ] owJA-R 4 ; YeI lowJA-R 4 4
LnAf Ti rno 30 ] Isoo$ TZ1ne 3.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase ccrrrbination order; 91 #5 #6
+ - +w ----r r r T --r ---r r -E --f ! -E f r. .r - : E f r ------r r ----1
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c 9f c Apprvach;
Hvmts Cap Flow Ratia Ratio De1ay UOS Delay LOS
dw--- - - - - - - m. h.
WS LTR 1234 631 0.89 0.51 21.3 e 21.3 c
NB LT 2804 1184 0 93 0.42 22.3 C 22 3 c
Oa W4 3*37 350 0. ~at 9 , 1 i ,SV . o D 30.6 D
Iritersert3 on ne1 ay = 23 9 (ssc/veh) i~tersec~~on LO5 o C
0 IN. 4
it should be noted na changes in geometric designs are
required. ~
Tay3or ~g3neerxa~q, Inc. Traffic S#udY sVpl~t
S• z,p• 'o FWPOSED REZM 2 Attachument "CA"f RevisiarY lwo. 3
NOV-07-94 MON 06:39 AM P•07
~ f
1
t
ANAI,YBIS of 2005 With BUILDOUT 6 EASTSOIIND RA1rIP8 IINSIGpALIZEp
Based on procedures described in Appendix I(of Chapter 10)
of the 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL, the followinq estfmates Were
derived.
*****~**~***************#*****~**~x~t****~**~*#******************~****
1285 HCM: UN~SIGNALIZED INTERSEC~~ON~S
*******t*f~rft~#*,~t tf *t~*~*t~*~*~~~~~r~*~**r~~~,~*~~*,r*,~
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
~ ~ ~ ~ w~ --1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---Y ---1 ------r
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAK HOVR FACTOR .95
AREA POPULATION 300000
. 300000
NAME OF THE EAST EST STREET.... Tr n Eb Ramps
NAME OF THE NORT ~SOUTH STREET... Su~I~van
NAME OF TKE ANALYST.. TEI
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS tmm~c~d~yy)...... 11-04-1994
TZME PERIOD ANALYZED.............. P.M. Peak HQur
OTHER INFORMATION.... 2000 t~/ Proposed Rezone b Wb Ramp I/S Signalized
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
w =M~m ----r --------w ~~Wmwmr -r r
INTERSECTIOIV TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP 6ION
CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIC3N
~~~MMrMr --r---w--- ~=M r------~~
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---r r ` ----w -1
EB W8 NB SB The actual estimates have
factored n accordance with the
LEFT 179 0 0 0 the est~Qund green b red
THGHT 0 0 0 682 + yel~ow time see page 3 0f
RI 682 1 1 0 this attachment (i.e. no nort~i
(hasouWtqb?und t t raf ei c otber
NUMBER 0F LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB WB NB SB
LANESUSAGE L+2R LTR 2 2
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS (None)
w W~w ----r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -r --------------r -----w
VEHICLE COMP4SITION (Default Factor = 1.22)
~ ~~~~~~--.r-------- =_=Mmm~ r----..
CRITICAL GAPS (Table 10-2)
--r
CAPACITY AND LEVFL-OF-SERVICE
r - ----r m -----w
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
MOVEMENT vtpeph) cA{~pcphT cM~pcph~ cSHfpcphI cCAp~CITYv LOS
-p---~--- R SH
MINOR STRBET
EB LEFT 187 3 6 356 > 356 356 > 169 169 >D D
THROUGH 0 4~2 412 > 412 > 412 > A
RIGHT 711 939 939 939 228 C
MINOR STREET
WB LEFT 0 120 37 > 37 > 37 > E
THROUQH ~ 1000 1000 ~ 1000 1000 ~ 999 9412 99 ~A A
RIGHT
MAJOR BTREET
SB LEFT 0 1000 1000 1000 1000 A
NB LEFT 0 553 553 553 553 A
it should be noted the eastbound off-ramp requires two lanes
to achieve these levels-of-service.
Tayl or lDagineering, Inc. Traf f 2 c St udy S`uppl en=t'
8• I•P. `a pjgwcm RB'l= 3 Attachment "CA"/Revfsian No. 3
NOV-07-94 MON 06:40 AM P•08
.
7►:1:~trKa~p~E ut LsVSL-O!-a~SliVlt?tf "jj" Or DE'1'T$R llui I-90 KAnP s
il'C.lt . 0L V%4ALi 1 Lr GL 11'1 1 GKbbl.l JLV1V SUMMAKY
Conter For Microcomputers In Transportatlon
StireAf q: (F-W) T-4f1 NQrth (N-B) 8u11 ivntl
Analyst: TEI File Name: sb90B1VRZ.HC9
ArFSn Oryrn: nt}+.*r 11 05 74
Comme~t~t ! 7An~ Dlreationzl Dasfqn Ilour Vojtiamc:e (bDIIV'z) with R%s7Gt?!le
; 1M4*LvuuUd , westbouna ; Nortribound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No. Lanes > 1 1; 2 2 ; 2 1
Volumes ; ; 450 2 107; 530 1289 ; 1509 724
Lane Width ; 1112.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 ; 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; ; 36; 0; 241
-------------rr --r r r--.~~ ------------------r---------
Slqnal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left ;NB Left *
Thru ; Thru
Right ; Right * *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left * ; SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right
Right
*
Peds Peds ~
NB Right ;E$ Right
sa Right ;ws Right
*
Green 21A ;Green 17A 40A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellcu/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Tlme 3.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 # 6
rrr-..~ ~
Intersectfon Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach:
Hvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
-
WB L 1492 365 0.65 0.24 26.0 D 21.2 C
LT 1494 365 0.65 0.24 22.2 C
R 1492 1044 0.07 0.70 2.8 A
NB L 3229 646 0.91 0.20 38.7 D 13.8 8
T 3510 2418 0.59 0.69 3.6 A
SB T 3510 1599 1.04 0.46 37.5 D 31.8 D
R 1492 680 0.75 0.46 13.2 B
Intersection Delay = 23.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
-r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --r -------r ~ -------r ~ ~ ~ ~ --r ------r r ------r r ----r
Tay1 or Ehgineering, Inc. Traf fic Study Suppl ement
S. I. P. I9 RF',GW 4 Attachrrmt "CA"/Revisf on No. 3
NOV-07-94 MON 06:41 AM P.09
~ .
y w
~
HCM: SIaNALIZED INTERSECTION $UMMARY
Center For Mxcrocomputers In Transportation
~ ~'7 Y V h~..~~~~ ~w~~~~~~~~1'~Cri~i ~~=Si3 rr~~~
Streets: (E-W) I-90 South (N•S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S690BSRZ.HC9
Area Type: Other 11-05-94
Comment: 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
' r~~ ~ r r---
No, Lanes ; 1 1 c 1 2 1; 2 2
Volumes ; 264 1 1389; ; 1555 640; 191 1768
Lane Width 1112.0 12.0 12.0; ; 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; 463; ; 213; 0
~ ~ --------1 --Y -----r -----r -----r
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * ; NB Lef t
Thru Thru *
Right Right * *
` Peds Peds *
WB Lef t ; S8 Lef t *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right
Peds * ; Peds * *
NB Right ;EB Riqht
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 30A ;Green 8A 40A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 0.0
Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combinatfon order: #l #5 #6
------r ~ ~ ~ ~ --r r ----w --r ---w w - M~-w ----------r -r
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat vfc q/c Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay L06 Delay LOS
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Wr " M----
EB L 1492 514 0.54 0.34 19.0 C 31.9 D
TR 1492 514 0.95 0.34 35.9 D
R 1492 514 0.95 0.34 35.3 D
NB T 3510 1716 1.00 0.49 27.0 D 22.5 C
R 1492 879 0.51 0.59 5.4 8
58 L 3229 323 0.65 0.10 32.9 D 17.5 C
T 3510 2067 0.95 0.59 15.8 C
intersection pelay = 22,7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
---w-----r-ww--~r------~
Taylor gigsneering, Inc. Traffic Study SLpplement
s• I.P. Is FJCUM 5 Attacbnent "CA"/ReviLsian No. 3
~
.
• ` , •
raylor Engmeermg, Inc.
Civil Design and Land Planning pnnciPals
September 20, 1994 Perry M Taytor PE
Stanley R Strrlrnga
Mark A Atonson P E
John Pederson Davrd C Larsen, PE
Spokane County Planning Department
W 1026 Broadway Assoctaces
Spokane, WA 99260 scocr M ausch, PE
RE Spokane Industrial Park
Zone Change from I-2 to I-1 and B-3
Dear Mr Pederson
Enclosed is a copy of a revise'd conceptual site plan for the zone change referenced above T'tuus
revision was prepared as a result of the County Engineer's lack of support of three accesses to
Sullivan Road from this project Modifications to the traffic study reflecting only two accesses
are being prepared and a revised traffic study will be submitted to yourself, WSDOT, and the
County Engineers
,
During the design review meetuig held Sept 7, Leonard Cash, WSDOT, requested we analyze
as part of our study, the Trent Avenue ramps and Sullivan Road intersections Taylor
Engineering met with WSDOT several tunes as far back as a year ago to determule what
analyses were necessary for this project The traffic study prepared reflects the scope as
determined upon meetulg with the Counry Engineers and WSDOT Not only has the need for
this analysis never been brought to our attention, while completing traffic counts on Sullivan,
Taylor Engineenng field crew did not notice lengthly queues at these intersections
Please accept the revised conceptual site plan and application fees for the zone change We will
contuZUe to work closely with the Enguieers and WSDOT as we continue with the project
However, in an effort to satisfy WSDOT, the revised traffic study wdl also analyze these
intersections as requested
Sincerely,
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC
"km
Frank R Ide, ASLA
Enclosure ~ REutl V ED ;
~ SEP 2 0 1994
cc ~ ~ ~ee s Leonard Cash/Greg Figg, WSDOT , '
Scott Brown, Pentzer Development Corporation ; SP~~~E ~Q~~ Ef~GiNEER
Stan Schultz, Witherspoon, Kelly, Davenport, Toole
W 106 Mission Ave • Spokane WA 99201 •(549) 328 3371
FAX (509) 328-8224
~ w •
Taylor EnbiLium..ermg,, Inc.
Civil Design and Land Planning pnncipaLs
September 21, 1994 Perry M Wor, PE
RECEIVED 5tanley R StilLng
Mark A Aronson, PE
Mr Pat Harper Davrd C Larsen, pE
Spokane County Engineers SEP Z 2 19~'~ Associates
West 1026 Broadway SpOKANE COUN1Y ENGINEER scoa M ausch PE
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Spokane Industrial Park Zone Change
Dear Mr Harper
This letter is a conf'umation of our discussions last week regarding the zone change
referenced above I have met with Scott Brown of Pentzer Development Corporation who
has agreed to remove the center access to the project at the County Engineer's request The
conceptual site plan does, however, include an entrance to the proposed B-2 properry where
the existing driveway is located at the southern end of the project This entrance, combined
with the northern entrance at Kiernan Avenue should provide adequate access to and from
Sullivan Road A revised traffic study analyzing the project with two accesses will be
submitted shortly for your review, and a revised conceptual srte plan has been submitted
With respect to roadway unprovements along the east side of Sullivan Road adjacent to the
project site, we propose to complete the unprovements ie, road widetung, curbs, and
sidewalks, as trips generated by the new commercial and industrial construction wanant the
necessity of such unprovements
Please call if you have any questions or if you need any additional information
Sincerely,
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC
.
Frank R Ide, ASLA
Landscape Arclutect
FRI/kmo/93-021 K/harper-092194
cc Scott Brown, Pentzer Development Corp
Stan Schultz, Witherspoon, Kelly, Davenport & Toole Attorneys
John Pederson, Spokane County Planiung .y
. ,
W 106 Mission Ave • Spokane, WA 99201 0 (509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328 8224
1
~ t
~ ' •
okane Industrail Park
• u. , , .cfi ~1 Qy .
0-1 ~ ~ h ~ • i i
J d! r H ~ g
"I e. r
' T4e +-wood . e~ School
ti ♦J i
. ~
~ ~ `
~ 0. ~ " . '
VY WE
' AV
.
43 W,,4 145 (46 147 ~ 151 15i2 153 154 155 156 157 158 1~9 ~60 161 ~ F
MEPOY Av
~ n~~vv~ ~ ~ ~ t 1 1!
EC ~ L\ VI ~ V AIAO/
~ a ~ o r a ~ ~
t.e~ra~er~
~v
RICM AvE ' o Z ' • a, .4. °a " ~ (
~ c.. ~
Q C + f _ . ~ ~ Y • ' . {y_ a~r ^
► V E. !X
~ r .y.
41 m
1 ~ ~
qR1 N.
~ . .
~~~C~`~C\\\`~~
~ KIERNAN M ~
~
\ { 4 } } / :
\ ~ v y}
\ ~ r
Y t t{ ti' y{ I
\ { t
\ x
I \ t y
` YS
~ 4 } { Sip
1NG 1`~JL ~ • IJVD ~/.S. Tp, 1/"L
~ Ei C L i D AvE
I \
\
E'JCL tD ~ Av
\
~ t
-
\ ~ ` • `
. .
9Ri0GE
~ r,.,..
- - II ~ NR4507
f--
~ ~ ~
~ '
~ , _ ~ ~
~ n _ - - - ~
.f SPOBANB II~1DT1STBi~, PARS
~ INGTON k~ S W. 1 4 OF SECTIQN 1~ 7 25N , R.44E W SPOKANE COUNTY. WASN ~111 / , M ~ ~i, R
AUG ~ ' UST 1994
~ ~ ~ ~ ,4 . ~ . 9 ~ 1 e~o. ,o ~ F- ~ , ~ u . \ , e~nc. a , ~ I t W ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ' I W ' ` ~ ~ ~ \ eix ~m ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ een~
~ el ~ , ~ ti,~, , ~ , ~I ~ Eag~a < ~ ~ ~ , ~ unty ` , „ ' ~ , , \ ~ ~ ~ N ~ CO ~ ` ~ ~ ~ L ~ , ~ e _u \~j.\~\,~` ~~1~~'\` ~ ~ ° ~ ~
----6 i i ~ s ~ ~ \ti\\\` ~\\\~~i ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ . ~ t w- ---~----1 - / I w \r\\.\.\\\\\\\ ,
~ , -e w----~--~-- - 1 v , - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -s~--- ~ - -
, 1ST SiRf~T ~ ~ ~ ~ r;- !-J..~~ ~I~ I ~ ~ m o m m m ~
I 6 ~ --`--6'--_~_1~L~~___^ ~ ~ I ~ ~ -~--6.~ - PROJECT INFORMAl10N - --a ~ _ _ ~1219 89 T '~,.,Q ° L- - _
~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ - J ti ~ ~ ' v ~ ' 6 54- , ~ - - - _ - PBQECT IdifA 21.5 AC E,tIST1110 2p~tiQ NEAW IHDU51R1AL (1-3)
~ ~ - PROPO'SFD ZOMNR nmus~eu a~rnc (~-~k ~ e ~c. ~ - - - ~ m cauuuwn eusr~ss (s-2k ~a~ ~c. ~
i i0 _ - } - - ~ ~ n , ' -
s ~ ~ ~ ~ POiFNilnl US~R hiE fpJAWMC IS A tJSt ~CT1vAE puttC. b M) ❑ I I I\\~~~ US£S ALlOMED M1W 1}1E ~ 4.I e iH1S L15T fS NOT IHTEI~tD lU mE?IiIFT AN
~ I ~ EX0.U9Vf UST OF USES ~ - d► . I , . _ _ o ~ + ~ « - - - - ~ o ~ ~
i ~ I - ~ h1 B-2 i W ~ I . ~ . ~ ASS~18LY ~NL
~ I 1 ~ ~RNCE $TATION ! r ~ ~
~ aas ~ RE'STAURANT ~ i i i ~ - n - - ...<<--- ~ ~ 0 ~ 6AM( T r ~7 BIDC ~ie~Ot 1fiADE SCF1001 ~ 1 ZOi~NQ } 729 89 ~s HOIIE IYPROVEIIF?rT CENTER ~
n _ ~ a~ s►wa t
- - ~ - - - i r ---8-2 t . - \ c~p w~,sH - - - - I b ~ - ~ o ~ u~c. ~mnc~s / p i r- sr O ~ ~ m ~ ~ .
~ p i ~ i N ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ht ZONE ~ ~2 ZONE B-2 ZONE
i ~ ~ - \ ' ~ 1 y su~r~ou~u r~u~n ~oaas~n M r~au~n PROPO~n ~ F CWPIT PROPO'SED ~ Ct7MPiY
~ \ 1` ` WN. LD1 IJ~rA 1 ACRE CW7Lt 10,400 S ' 280 00 ~ ~ ~nK t~ortr~cE. ~25 cau~r ~oo Cau~tr N _ ~ ~ ~ N 14N. FRONT tD StZBAG(. so' Cou~r 55 /s5 ca~r co61PLr ca,Enr
- a~ - \ ~ \ NRL SmE YD SEiBApC S COItPLY NOliE ~ T ~ ~ i~ ~ NM RFJ~R YD SEIBACK. 15 COkPLY 15' couat.r CQ/PlT COI/PLT
~ I ~ ~ MAIC 81DG I~VERAGE Sb% CWPLT 55X CONPLT orsMC oaae ~ YA% BLDR HF7CHT 40' COUPIr BC Cd1PlY ~ \ o au • ca~r o au • oo►~.r ~ ~ runcnrc CflNPLT ooNKr
i ~ 9CNACE CH. 14 6343~5 COYPLY Cti 1A 804 CafiPLY + ul SldilK~ M41 BE A£5111E11CAl1Y OONSSIDI THE ~ PRO~CT/AND CQIiALY ~
~ WmSCAPPI2 Qi 14806 FXCFFD CFL 1t908 DfCEFD g ~ ~ N S10RAGE, 01 14630.386 CddPLY C4l 14 62L335 Cd1PLT ~r
~p q¢115E S1pR/,GE CIL It6iaS60 C0IFPLT pi 1~.82Q~0 CGB►.T 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WAl1S C1i 1~ 830.36i CU4PLT dl. 1! 626.J65 CpJPLT f~ ~ i , ~ PUBLIC TRAHSIT CK 148D0345 O~PIt NONE4~~ N~Y ►.15p CtMP1.T i.368 CWPLT
- . _ _ +1 NFCHANICAL EOUtP_ qi 1~,63Q.319 e~r-- - ~ 1- , _ ~ - - ~ , - - - ` LIGHIWG pl tt 63ax0 C94PLr NONE ARpI Cp.~~
W ~ , - ~ ~ o~vtROMl~ks 0~. 630.345 ool~lr NOkE NONE W ARC1l iREAT1tFNT t?f. 14830.390 C01[PL► NOIff ARC11. C9uPl - ' ' ~ . NddE
~ ~ ~ _ j ~D.0.u - [1FPQIaNC ON USE ~ (n N I 0! RDG SE~+A4 ~ ~ \ /1RC41 Cp.IPAT NONE
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a I~x ~ ~v ~tass taR i ~ ; APPUCANT PENTZER DEVEL ROPI~IENT CORPOR;50N A(ipi, CONPAT ~
pa ~ ' , . - , , , ~eoe suwvnn ewc. ~ xt ~ atit u ' ~ _ } _ ~ ~ SPOKAk~ WA 99216-1670
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ \ l j j ~ ~ , , ~
) ~ e"-~ sn"°-`----- - ; - - o ~ e~oc. ~ LEGEND ~ o `
~---------1-- _ ~ Ii 4 m """u' o u,~ - i v \ ~ N ~ ~ sF~Jt uvu+aE , r8~7+ votF
, r ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 G~iC+ 8~9~1 ~ 1171t PCIE
rA V ~4 Clsl su TFA til UOSi 01~FRMEID ELL - 1-_---~-„
N ~ ~ $ rtito+ swrt arr oost ~raror r \ ---E'r--- . ~ ~ ` r -Y / I WS1NC
~ 7S WOiCN'C ~ i /J \ ~~j~ ~ WMDINIQ ~ F~15~NG FAtE n1DR~wt __6 5~- - OGST gnFlt ~ / ~ ~ J ~ G ~rf ~ ~ + a ~ ~ ~ ~i / ~ \/i i 1\ J WCSS'~R ~IRaI^~ noST o+rtsnC.Ae [x[cnat OGST li'A7CR
~ ~ % i ~ ~ f// \ 1/ ~ / ~ - ~ N 9-2Z ~ , ~ . ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i OGST gfkF
~ c~e~c ~ - , ~ ~ EJaST1NC ENiRT ~ - - ~f
. ~ PENTZFR . ~ svwvr~ Ro~o ~ a~r DIEI~ELO~PIEX1 i
PROPOSED ENIitT s~o~u~ ~ss ~o ~p~ppRA TaOJy ~ OI~Gi4TA1{! PAIM ~ . .m~a~wr ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 90lI~L. - -a - - - - PFNTZER ~ WraoPMxr
RENSIpNS Taylor F~gmeering, Inc coMvMn0,N
d~il D~clgo sud Land PleanL~y t 106 Yledoa Ave ~
gpok~na ~s~Gtnetan G~2Ul (5DD) 328-S711 fA1I (600) SZ6-622/ / nc SCALL 1
CONCFPNAL SITE PU1N ME
►ro~. 9~ ~w ~s coHC~~u~u a+ir IT IS SUB~CT uwN. ~ PROPOSED REZONE FROM I-3 1'0 CHAHGE BASm DN ACIUAL BJIIDNC PROPOSALS~ TO I-1 AND $-Z ~~,,,u,i sa.
IO
~ ~ 'G N1Yf_ 11R'tSl1 ~
4 i
Adftk
Wa5hington State ~71~ r iVor#h 6
P~4~y~fa~~ Street
Depa~r#r~ea~t of ~`ransportati~wn spokane WA 99207 2090
auane Beren#son
~er,retary oi Transportation (509) 456 3000
Fax (50$) 456 3089
~epteR7beT 7, 1994
Mi" TOm VeljIC
SpOkane Coullty P1arin1rig
WesC 1026 Broaduray Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0244
Re Industnal Parlc Zone Reclass
Dear Tvrn,
Thank you for the oppartrarulty to cornment on the above developrnent The Washington State
Department of Transpot-tatian (WSDOT) along with County Engmeers have received a traffic
study canducted 6y Taylor Engineenng for the above propvsal WSI]OT in conjunction with
the Cvunty► Enguieers are currently in the process af reviewing tlus traffic study and vvill
carnrnent on tt tn the next few weeks V~e would ask that until thus traffic sttzdy rs reviewed
and accepted by both WSDOT and the Caunty Engineers that a SEPA deternrunatlon not be
ma+de T'hYS wauld pravide us the tinne necessary to analyze the traffic study and detertnine if
it adequately addresses any adverse unpacts tlus develapment may have an the surrounding
traraspartation system
We would a1s0 lYfce to thank tihe applicant far providing the traffic study up frant pnor to pre-
deveIopment, as th~s wiIl allow us to make cvmments quicker than had the study been
provided after the pre-development meefing
If you have arty questions regarding the above please feel free to contact Leoflard Cash in our
Regkonal Plannung Office at (509) 324-6199
Stncerely,
~ C LENZI
Regpanal Adrmrustratpr
aeL
By LEONARD CASK PE
Regronal Planmng Englneer
JCL
, LCCIg)f
cc Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
1 r
September 7, 1994 at 1 15
Spokane Industnal Park Zone Reclassificatton
Generally located east of and adjacent to Sulhvan Road, approxunately
1,600 feet south of Trent Road in the SW 1/4 of Secnon 1, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane Counry, Washington
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Industnal, and within the Pnonty Sewer
Servlce Area (PSSA)
EXISTING ZONING Heavy Indusmal (I-3)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone Reclassification from Heavy Industnal
(I-3) to Industnal Park (I-1) on approxunately 7 8 acres for hght assembly,
office and those uses allowed in the Industnal Park (I-1) zone, and
Community Buslness (B-2) on approxunately 13 7 acres for office, retail,
restaurant and those uses allowed in the Commuruty Business (B-2) zone
PARCEL NUMBER 45013 9090
SITE SIZE Approximately 215 acres
APPLICANT Pentzer Development Corp
3808 North Sullivan Road, Bldg N-15
Spokane, WA 99216-1670
(509) 924-1720
AGENT Taylor Enguieering
Frank Ide
106 West Mission, Suite 201
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 328-3371
ASSIGNED PLANNER Thomas Veljic
DE`l'ERMINATION OF ~ECEiVED
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) Ooul f 211994
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
Couuty Engineertng
FILE NUMBER(S) ZE-41-94 PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Zone Reclassification from Heavy Industnal (I-3)
to Industnal Park (I-1) on approximately 7 8 acres for light assembly, office and those uses
allowed in the Industnal Park (I-1) zone, and Community Business (B-2) on approximately
13 7 acres for office, retail, restaurant and those uses allowed in the Commumty Business
(B-2) zone
APPLICANT Pentzer Development Corporaaon
3808 North Sullivan Road
Building N-15
Spokane, WA 99216-1674
(509) 924-1720
'
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road,
approximately 1,600 feet south of Trent Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
LEAD AGENCY SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DETERMINATION The lead agenc,y for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Envu-onmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is agi required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This
informahon is available to the public on requeSt
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this DNS must
be submitted no later than 4 00 p m, November 15, 1994, if they are intended
to alter the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL WALLIS D HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR ~
By John Pederson, Senior Pldnner
Phone (509) 456-2205
Address Spokane County Planning Department
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
DATE ISSUED 061D~Y 20 , 1994 SICNATURE
QONP►EVTS RFGARDING INVtRONN~ITAL OONC~QZNS WFUnOME AT THE HFt1RIlNG
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260 The appeal deddline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10)
calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the proJect This
appeal must be wntten and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objecaons
Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2 WA State Department of Health
3 Spokane County Health District
R,.&,r,AQ.nf., i --Gi16Mi~
5 Spokane County Au Polluhon Control Authonty
6 Spokane County Parks Department
7 Spokane Counry Boundary Review Board
8 Spokane Reglonal Transportation Council
9 WA State Department of Transportation
10 Spokane Transit Authonty
11 East Valley School Distnct
12 Spokane Industnal Park Water District
13 Fire Dismct No 1
i
~
:
, .
a
V ~
SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK
PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
~
.
_ ~ .
Z E 41 94
,
~
3POUlt1L LNVIRONfCb"Z►I.'ORDIltAJICL ~
(vAC 197-L1-960) Seecioe 11 30 230(1)
♦ bALxGt04iJD (coetlnued)
9 Oo you Smw vrecl+er applicatioos •rn pending for govce'emental approvals o( ocber proposal• ditectlr af(eccin6 the propcrcr coveced by rour
ropo.al' tf 7es, erylaln
NnnP Knnwn
10 L,isc aay =ovsrneeni approvali or peralt• cfiat vill be nceded tor your pcoposal. if imovn
Approval'of Zone chanaes, variaus construc}1_ on_nermits and approvals of ~
utility and site plans. (~iso, approv~-al of Bindinq Site Pl~ - ha w2v4,,
~
i~Cx'GtX•~^ Ly['itj
11 Cive a briet, eomPlete deseriDtlon of 7wr ProPosal. lncludin6 the Proposed vaes and the •i:e ot the yrojecc •nd •itc 'herC~ versl
questions Lcer lc th!• checkllrt tAac aak you to descsibe certair aapeccs ol rout proposal You do e►ot osed to Tepeat those aruvers on this
DabIt
RQzone area near main entry of Spokane Industrial Park. 13.7 acres will be B- 2 for
fiitimP rnmmPrmal retai 1 uses 7. uacres will be zoned for I-1 for future liqht
industrial uses ('-rAat_i nn of Bindina Site Plan inc? udincr Drouosed B- 2 and I-1 zone.
,
12 [oeatlon oC the ptoposal Glve sutflciene lniotnatioa for a person to undetstand the pteeise lou tlon ot rou[ ycoposed pro}ect, includin ~
a[taat addtess, 1[ any. and •ectloo. tovn+nip aad ian6e, if kr►ovn It a propos+l vovld occvt over • ranee ot area, provtde the range or
Douadarles oE the ai[e(s) trovlde a legal descrlptlon, ilce plat►, Ktinitq sap. and tepo=rapAlc nap, if reasonably avalLble Lfiile you
shoulE suDnit aay pLas sequlred bT the aaency. you are eot stQulsed to dvpllute aaps or decalled pLns subni[ted vlch anr petmlt ayplleaclon
ce L ced to chis checklist
ProMsed location will be at and ad7acent to 3808 North Sullivan Road, Bldg. N-15.
See attached vicintv maD and sitQ pla_n.
~~~lG/ / ~ • ~O
~
17 Coes the proyosed action lie vi[Rio the Aqultct Senj1[ive Area (ASA)• -Ae Ceneral Sevet SeMce A[ca• ;he lriorlcy SeveT Secvice Area' '1+e
City of Spoksne2 (See Spotiane Councr's ASA OvetLr 2ons AcLs lor pout+darles)
Erooosai ls within the ASA and aeneraJsewer service area,
i ~
ro ac coMFLrLD aT AFnuk%rr
E WFIIC0R`CR".1L LI.DCat'S
Evaluation Foi
Agencr u.c orir
i EA=
a Ceoeral dcseription of the •ite (eirele oae) t L e. rolllnt. ktlly. steep slopei, sasntaioous.
ocfur
i ~
b Sfi;t !s the iceepesc ilope oo the tite (appro:3aate psrcent •lope)'
1 - 3% SlOp2
t WTat acoeral types oi solls are fovnd on the s1te (for exsaDlt. tlay. land, aravell psat, evct)'
If 7ou knov the eLssltiucion of a6tScultucal •o11s, speclty ehe• and oote any prive tarsLod
GaA Carri son gravP> > y i nam
d Ara chare suriue indicationa or Alitory of unatabL soils in the Lmediace vitiai:rl lf so. _
dasesiDs e
T~Tn
~
~
7F/ A I
~ spO1U12fL L?(71R0h'TQ?CLAL OItDLtfANGE
(WAC 19)-11-960) Secclon 11 10 230(1)
s LNPLRON'QtfLAL LLZTQ2f'S (eoncirtued) ' • Cvaluacion Iror
Agency u.. onlr
(S) vhet pro[ectlve eeaaurss vtll Da takaa to insuta tlta[ leika or spllls of onr eReateal•
scored oc used oe► alt• vill noc be allovsd to petcolaee [o tcoundvacer (chis locludss ssasures to kesp chanicals out of dlsposal srstea• descriDed in 3D(2) taA 3b(3)9
Anv i nac3v rtPn .sgillage will be cleaned uo a.n a manner
consistent with Federal, State and local guidelines.
e Vacec ltur►olf (ineludln= scoe4 vatee)
(1) Oeaeclbe the souree ot ruaofl (teeludlnt sCOes vacec) and ifCN0d ol collectlon and dLeposAl ~
1f anr (laclude Quanclties knovn) 4Tera v111 thle uster Ilov• V111 cK s wa[ar [lov laCO ~
ochet vacers' If io. QescriDe
StorBiwater will be collected and disposed of by 11208" swales ~nd
na . ura1 rainage
,
(2) 1t1I any enenieals De scored 1►andled or uaed oo CAe site in a loea.lon vhece asp121 0r
leak vill dratn to surfsee or acoundvacec or to ► stac-a vacer dispo"l iysc m dlse2ur6lnL to
suctace or ;roundvacec'
Any material shall be stored as oer Department of Building
and SafPtv and as per Gtandards in the ASA overlav zone.
(7) Could vasce satnrials encet iround oc outtace v ters• Il so. a•ner•lly descctbe
NonP is an icioated
d Ctoposed measutea to raduee or tontcol •utfaee ;round, and evno!( vacer tv?acco tt any (!f
eAe pcoyosed ae[Son lie• vichln [he AquLfer Sensicive Aee• De tspselally elea^ on ez9latuciona
[elacing co tset1itie4 eoaceratag Sectioas 3D(6). 3b(5). sod 3e(2) of thi• checklisc)
Treat-mient_ nf riinnff viaarass e~ rcolation areas as oer
Spokane County 11208" requirements.
ruvrs
a rhecc or eircle type of vegetation tound oc► the alce 1
i
I. declduous tces aldar naple aspen.(o [hec~ ~
~ eversteen tcee fir eedar. 0`oth`cr
y sRcvDs j
~ graas ~
~
pascure ~
ctoQ or =ratn '
vec aoll plancs. eactall, butcercup bullrvsh. slcuok eabsa6e. othec ~
vacer plants wacer ltlly. ael=[ais. dl[oll otRec ~k
1
ocheC trpes ot vegscaClon
!
b Vhac tind and anovnt of ve6ctaclon vill De r moved or a1Ce[ed• ~
Trees, shrubs & grass
~
e Liot thre.ateeed or endangered •pecles krovn to be on o[ near ehe •ite
None lrnown
P[oposed landscaptnt, use of aatlva p Ln[e or otAar nessures to pcesetve or eit+anee vegetaCioo
on Ct+e sice. 11 any ~
prML, rlP i andsCapp hiiffPr, ornamPntal landscaolnQ as per 1
Spokane County Zoning Code. '
s
1- 41 w-
q,
r
(HAL 197-I1-960) Section 11 10 230(1) SPOKAkE EFtVIROHr1EKTllL'OROIRIJtCQ
8 fMYIROtDiEHTAt ELEMLHTS (contlnued)
1 Evaluetton For
Attlr S Agency Use Only
e irtle any birds and anlmals which Aave Detn oDserreQ on cr neer the site or are known to De on
or neer the itte
Dirds ha.+k, heron. eagle. songDirds other) namraals deer. Dear, elk, Deaver, ot~er Small Rodents
t1sA biss, salmon. trout. herring. sheltflsh. other
other /14~G a.jt.l~Lll4
b llst •ny threatened or endan9ered spectes known to be on or near the slte j
!
NnnP Knnwn ;
~
~
f
t Is the site part of i wigration rovte' lf so. explale i
t
Nn ~
!
d Propose0 oeesures to preserve or enhance rilQiite, it iny ~
T.anr3s-,raping t0 attract sonctbirds. '
5 EMERGY AND K1INRAL RESOURCES
a w►+at kinGs of energy (eleetrte. nacuril ges, xooQ store, solar) w111 be use0 to met the ;
the completeE project's energy needs7 OescriDe whether it will Ge vsed for Aeat{ng. manufic• (
turiny. etc ~
Gas & e ectricitv will be used for heating, manufacturing~
and commercial uses. '
i
i
1
b would yovr project affect the potentia) use ot zolar enerqy by adjacent propertiest It so.
generally describe
No
c uhat kinds ot energy eonservation teatures are 1ntludeQ 1n the plans of thts proposal' list
other proposeQ measures to reduce or tontrol energy ir+picts, !f any
Buildings will meet all aAplicable enerqY code requirements.
~
~
~
,
~
1 ENYIROHHENTIIL HEAITH
i Are there any enrtronmental health Aazards. lncluding ezposure to toztc cAenicals. risk ot fire
and explosion. spfll. or Aszardous vaste, iRat tou14 occur is a resutt of tAis proposal? If so.
descriDe
Anv health hazards will be handled as per Federal, State
aud local health requirements.
(1) Describe special emergency servlees that aigAt pe reQulred jf
None lnown at this time. - ~
L L
Z 41 6 94
.
sporaxa txvltoxrtrft.u. oRntwe+a
(VAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
b LNVIROlRQHTd1 L1.L`dNI'S (cooticued)
Svaluatlon !oc
kencr u.e onlr
j Approtimatelp hov zanr people vouid the eoopleted project ESsp Lce• NQ(1P
k lroposed •e.asurai to •vold oi reduce displacaoieo[ iapac[s. it any
N1 /A
1 Ttoposed neasures to ensuTe the proposal i• eonpatiDle vitb axistioj •ad proseeted Lnd uses and
plans. it anr
R,y provi di na T-1 zoning as a buffer between a portion of area I-3
and B- 2 zonina. B- 2 uses will also support Spokane Industrial Park users.
v
J / ~✓~a~✓S~r
9 HOUSIHC
• Appro:laacelr hov many unica vould be provided, !t •nrt InQieact vfiethe[ hl=h-. nlddle-. os r`
lorit+coee housing
b Approximaceiy l+ov manr uri[s, if any. vould be eliainatedt Indi u te vhetf+er Ri;A-. aiddle-. or
lov-lncooe hovslnY
N /A
c Proposed neasurea to reduee or control Roualn; lspacts. Sf anr
10 /ILSYtIF.TICS
a What 1• the tallest helaht of anr proDosed acructurc(s). not SncluEint aotennast ti7ltit 1s the
principal excerior bullding naterial(s) proposed'
StnuctLres will not exceed 40' in I-1 zoninq and 60' in
77on i nrr . as D~e~ COde.
D Wf►s[ viev• in the irmediate v1elnltr vwld be alcersd or obstructedf
Views to existinq industrial uses.
t lroposed measutes to redvee or eoatrol .estAetie lopaeta it anr
T.an~p, na and bufferinct of proposed uses
11 LiCti! A,vD C1ARL
a tTuc crae of 11aAt or sL re vill cAa propoaal produce2 .rhat tiae of Q.y vould !c a.inly oceur2
T.,ahts from vericles, buildinas and parkinq areas. '
~
D Could li=hc or = L re troa the linished pro}eet Do a aafeCy Aasard ot inteTfece vith vleval f
No
e Vhae szistln6 oft-@lte •ovree• oi 116AC or = LTC nar ailaet your proposall ~
1jh1- ing f rom v h, r_ i es and ad iacent industr i a 1 uses. ~
d Troyosed ■easures to redvee or eoncrol liiht and jL rt iapaets. !t aoy
t1sP 1 andscra,nl ncL buffers and screens to control liqht and glare. _
p
•
/4
k l
tE 1 94
t
.
► . IL •
SPOT.Ast LA1'I1tON`QN".AL OFDIrJINR
(16At 197-11-960) Sectioe 11 10 230(1)
b EXV11t0JQ4.N'"AI. LLC`MN'S (cootinucd)
L'w.lwtion For
A,Scncr u.a onlr
f 8ov oaay vehlcul• trips pcr dsy vw16 bc gencratcd br t1+c tooylcted projeu' it knovn. r
lndfutc vhen pcak voulE otcut .
Nn}_ knC)-.m a t t.Y,i q t i mP _~Sec Ahk -keA
j Troposed measure• co reduce or tonttol transportatloo Seyacts. if anr
ac-h proUOSPd llSe wi11 reC7l11rP_ indiYid ua1 _c,,it.P alan review.
gQprozriate mltj,aatincs measures will be determined for the `
c caf t hat 1 mr~
.
15 PtTDtIC SEAVICES ~
a Jould the projecc tcsult in aa SneTeascd eeed foT qu:lit set~ ce~ ( Fcirr-t. ~~~~•P ~.1- ! e yrocett on.
G~
pa2_ee pte e•tion hcalch eare, •e?+ools. ocher)' I[ so =enerilly descTlbe Q~
i rP apc3 Pnl i r-p~pro ._ctj on 311 1 1 bP rPMii rPd; /
- - ~
b tropoaed susures to soCuce or ton[rol l:tett Sayatta on pvbltt sorvlcei t' any
Prnvi dQ irP hydranf-,,sprlnklPr s4 stem~s 3nd adecruate
firP vPh~r1P arrPqq.
6 iTILI'IES `
a C1 ut111 cur-enelr avallable at ere s:ce cleeCilci ~nAtural gas ~atet~ef~ac )
/
~er~vlce elepAooc .n1 ary fever, seatle srrten. o ,
b Descrlbe re W! ico that •re p-opeaeE 'or t1+c projec , the ut'1' r p'ovIG1rt6 the serv:te •nd
the :encral conscrucLion acc:v4tlc• on the sIte or ln the lsoeCiace Kcinitr vls:ch s.ttAC De
neeleE ,
F.~ Qc-tr, r al3j (-7as from WWP. Water from Snokane Industrial P
Park Water District, Sewer from Spokane Industrial Park
C SIG`.A'VRL ~
1. the undersigned, rvur un2er the pcn+ltr of pcrjury tlut the aDove rcopotvce Are auEe trvthllu117 and ce the Deat oOl •7 1ct+wledse I also
unCerstand that shou?d 'Aeze De anr villful a:srcprescn utton or villful Lct of full dSselosure on sr yart. the !~enev iar witDlrav •nr
deter¢.sution ol nons gnliicance chrt tt e:tRt iasve ln rcli.+xe upon this chetklist
Dste ,Tu ~ 2 rt ao ichard D Rollnick, President
o rt.(ple u c Prict oc 77?c)
PtPone PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Phone (509) 924-1720 ~ 3808 N SULLIVAN ROAD, BLDG N-15, SPOKANE, WA 99216
~ ~
~ NG Dace June 23, 1994
TeCSOn covple[1nt lotn ~ArvF- r 0 ~ I ~~W2 ` c~~`~~~"~~►~~~ GN"I ~"~'7
rnane ( S 09 ) 32~ 3371
~
~
tOR ST/lTT ASL ONLT ~ Z E 41
Sta'f am Dei(o) revlevlna eAetk:?,.,. 94
aesd oo CT►1• acafl scvlev of t1acal eT+eeklisL and ot4+et ptrtiotot fnfor~tlon, the •taSf
A Concludes tTu[ ther robabli •f gnlilese+t •dvaTse Lepaeto aod reeor.aeods a deteraln&tloo oL oooalgnlfleanea
E Coocludes iha[ probaDle •Stnlfltae[ •dvcrse snritronneatal lapaets do es1sG foe CAa euT^tenC yropooal and reeoraoeeds a aieigated decer-
•loacion ot oon.itnific•oce vich coodition.
c Cootludes eTue trere •re proDable el:nlfle.a[_adveTse envizoimental iapact• and sacommends a EtteewinA[foo ol s1tn1f1taoce
TILIfrG T'a - !75 00
~
~ y a
~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATION.
c/o Frank Ide, Taylor Engineering, Inc.
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE Pentzer Development, Coxzp.
MAILING ADDRESS _w._ l 0 6 M is ci n n; qjia±,p 9 06
CITY Spokane STATE _KA ZIP 9 4 2 O 1
PHONE 3 2 8- 3 3 7 l (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
LCGALOWNER'S NAME PPnt,-Pr DPVPI anmPnt Cprp,PHONE 924-1 720
MAILING ADDRESS 3808 North Sullivan Roadl B1 da. N-1 5
~ CITY Spokane STATE 1pA ZIP 99216-1670
~ PROJECT/PROPOSAL SIT'E AREA acres or s9 ft ( )
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft )
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 01543-909Q
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSf1L _ At and adjacent t o 3808 N_ S» 1 1, van Rd. Bldg
EXISTIlNG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) 1-3 N-15
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Industrial and vacant land
PROFOSED ZONING I - 1,B-2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY i n d u s t rj_aj
SCHOOL DISTRICT East V4112v
F[RE DISTRICT Fixe D1stricT#1
WATER PURVEYOR Sqokane Industr ia l Pa rk
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single famfly dwellings Duplexes Multlfamily dwellings
~ Manufactured homes Business (x) Industnal (s) Mixed Use
Other(X) - Describe GenerF%l Reta? i& Light Tnd iq al T.-,P~
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY
None Known
B LFGAL/ZONE RFSA4A,33IFI(':A7'I() I F RMATInNs ~
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL At and ad i acent to 380$ N. Suliivan Rd. Rldg N-15
SECTION I TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Sul l ivan Road
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC R4AD
A pprny_ 9qp_Q •
r Z E 41 94
~
~
, - -zt
,
~
ZONL RECLASSLFICATIG.. APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
r , _ " •
~
/
0
DOES THE FROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (K) YES E) NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIALROADS Sul 1 i van Rnarl -ic Planned ac prinCl,pal arterial
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
See af:tachPd 1 Paa,l dAarr,,i tin». ,
EXISTING ZONE(S) _ 1--3 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ B-2 , I-1
FOR THE FOLLOWIING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW _ SeP attarhPrl 1 Arral rl .qr-ri ni-,~,i nn_
~
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TTTLE TO THE PROFERTY, WHAT IS YOUR IIVTEREST IN IT9 _
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITI4NS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED9 NPPd fnr qu_nr~~t_i nrr ameniti_g tn servp
industrial nark, tennants anc3 Pmr~l nTpc
WHAT IMFACT WILL THE PROFOSED ZONfi RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES 9 i mD a c ts w t 1 1 h A t n d ust r 1 a 1 a n d htLS 1_n pcc,-usp-.r.~
which wlll have minimal effPC-t on ac]iarent ind»qtr;al uspc
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSTFICATION9
Need far .9upnn~rt i ng amP~itip_,,,c fo- Tnc31»t ri a 1 park _
D__ gP traffir- t-raxr.elinci aD 1c;1i11ivan Roari_
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROFOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE9
Provi c3P npDnrt,jml,t.i Ac bu fari nrr anA
othPr rPrs» i 1'PTI'1P1'1tC rpqu]r,rAd, bli SpokanP Countv 7.nn incr C_nr7P _
•
Z E 41 94
- ~ -
.
~
ZONE RECLaSSIFICATI4N c'LICATIOh Page 3 of 4
r J ~ r- , - ^
PART II
TH1S SECTiON OF THE APPLICA110N WI.,i. PROVtDE'alE YLANNIING DEPARTMF.N? STAFF WITH
WR1TfEN vERMCATION THAT THE APPLICAN'I' HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTA't'ION WI?'fi "Iim-
AGENCIES IDENTIFED RESUL; S OF't'HHE PREI.IMINAItY CONSULTATION SHAL.L nE iNCORPORATED
IN THE PROP4SAL BEFORL FINaL. SU8MITTAL TO rHE PLANNiNC DEPAFt?MENT
F'iRt? MaRSHALI.IFjRg
DiSTRiCT A THIS FROPOSAL IS WITHFN FIRE PRO7E NO I
-ir
It ADEQUATE ARkANGEMENtS (HAVE) AY~ rI EEt~ ?viADE TO M~EE1' OUIZ NEEDS
IN PROVIDIIIG FaR AN ADEQUA"iE wATER S aND FaCII.i'iMS FOR FME
PROTECTION PURPOSES
C RECOMMENDED FME FLOW* u k 1C. . , OR UNABLE ?0 CALCULA'TE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIM'fIVE, AND WILL BE DE'rERMII4ED AT BUII,vING PERMIT
APPLICATlON TIME ~ f
D RECZMEMENTS INCLUDE ~J ~ Y'~°`~ l~GGP•to ()~c r i` ~ ~ev''•, ~~S
,
~'16 -9y
FLX DISTRICt SiGNATCJRE/TITLE DaTE
1t;'
~ WATER I'U12VEY4R
A. SATlSFACTORY ARR FNTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FLRE FL,OW
RLQL:fW.MENTS QHAVE) (KAVE N01') BEEN MADE
B REQUIREMEN't'S/C4MMEN'I'S
~
sP0~A1-' luft,~~,l'AI/1;PilRP, i 1Ir A5.`.FT" AtAGT L-3Z-'P,l,,.
WATER DiS1TtICT SIC3NAr'fURF./I'1TLE DA'fE
COt1NTY ENGINEER
A PRELiM!NARY DISCUSS1O3v HaS TAKEN PLaCE AND G&NERaL REQUItEMENTS FOR ROA►DS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN D(SCUSSED yV1TH TFE APPLICANT
A COMM.NTS
1
2AL14
SIGNATURfMTLt- DA?E
COLiNTY U3ILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCuSSION HAS T4KFN PLACE AND GFN'ERAL REQUFFLEMENTS FOR
SU$MTI'AL OF 1'HIS PROPC)SAL (HA'VE) (HA'VE N4T) BF,EN SATIS -=D THE DFSIGNATED
waTF-R PifRVEYOR FOR "TH1S SZ'c'E IS
ub'y"
A COMMEKTS h
ITLE ATE
.
NEALTH DISTRICT '
A PRELiMINARY DYSCUSSIdN HAS TAKFN PL KAi. REQUIRsMEN'TS FOR
SUEMI'1'Y'AL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) AVENOT} SEEN SATISFIFD
A caMMErrrs ~ l ' ~ , ~-z,~ L.~4~ ~f' • •~s ~'l~' ~
SIGN ~
ATURErl'I?LE A
1
~r SEwER PURYEYOR '
A PRELiMINARY DiSCUSSI0N IIAS TAK.EN pLACE AND GLNERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROvfSiON OF PUBLIC SEwFR ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THfi APPLiCANT
A COMMENTS•
sPor.A~ Ja~6,05rVA(. IAR ' V P ~ ~cT ~''-Z 9
~:~~.L~ y
SI ATURE/TITLE DATE
~
•
Z E 4 94
.
C ~
\
♦
ZaNE RECLASSZFICAI'rON rii'PLYCATIOiv Page 3 of 4
,
. .
PART 11
7IiIS SECTION OF THE APPLICA 1IUN WiLL PFOVIDE 'fHE YLANNTNG DFPARTM.ENT STAFF WITH
WRZTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANI' F-IAS HAn PREI IMIIJARY CONSULTATION WIni TKE
AGENCIES IDEN=LED RESULTS OF THE PRELIN4TNARY CONSULTATION SHALL, BE INCORF'URA rED
IN THE PRQPOSA.L BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO TIiE PLAI`INING DEPARTW4ENi'
FIRE MARSIIALL/FIRE BISTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAi, IS WITHTN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO
B ADEQUA'IE ARRANCEMfiNTS (HAVF) (HAVE, NOT) BEEN IviA.DE TO MECT OC1-R NEEDS
TN PROVIDING FOR AN A.bEQUAT'E WATER SYSTEtii AND FACII.ITMS FnR FIRE
1'ROTECTION PURPOSES
C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW , OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NGW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE llETE:tMINED AT BUII.llING PERMIT
Al'PLICATION TTME
D RECIUIREM'ENTS INCLUDE
FIRE DTSTRJCT SIGNATUREfrITLE DATE
a~ WATER T'tJRVEXOR
A SATISFACTORY ARR ENTS FOR DOMESTTC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQ~JIREMENTS (~iA VF.) (EiAVF NOT) BEEN MADE
II REQUiREMENTS/COMMENTS
AJli L P/1Px ` V~/'ss(--rXt0G ; t/,- z z- Yy
.S P0 1uLv< r
WATER DrS7'RTCT SIGN URE/TITLE DATE
,
,
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSrON HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAITIAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT
A C4MMErITS
r)
~
~ SIGNATU'R,EMTL DA'I'E
COUNTY U'I XLITIES A PRELIMrNARY DTSCi1SSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THTS pROPC3Sf1I, (HAVE) (HAVE NQT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESYGNATEn
WA'I'ER PURVL•YOR FOR THTS SITE IS
A COMMENTS t'1. 4z,y, r-a,j PuC-vu--ff,
. ITLE DOATE
C `
HLALTH DISTRTCT l
A PRELLMINARY DISCUSSTON HAS TAKEN PL RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL UF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) A`'E NOT) BEEN SATISFTFD
A COMMENTS
~ STGNATURE/IZTT.,E ~ 6A SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DiSCUSSZON HAS TAKEN F'LACE ANA GLNERAL REQUIRLMENTS FOR THE
PROVISIOri OF PUBLIC SEI7VER A.RE UNDERST00D BY THE APPLICA.NT
A COMMENTS
s Porn~~ ~1~20Jsr~r~a~ ~A1;~ /!l P/~SS~r Mu~T Z Z-~5%
SIGXATURErI'TTLE DAT'E
J
~
~~t •
Z E 41 94
~
r
,ZONE RE-CLASSII=ICATIG &PLICATION Page 4 of 4
~ ` r r u ~ M
r
PART ZZY
SLJRVEY4R VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED L.AND SURVEYOR, HAVL COMPLETED TI-E INFORMATION
REQUCSTED FOR THE ZONING MAP AND WTtITTEN LEGAL DESCRIP'TION
SIGNED .--t-,. DATE 3-/ 7 ' 9
ADDRES S /a PHONE
c~
4 . t-cdror zrP /
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LE-'IfiER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR ~~ARRIU! ~ THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF TH-E AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF
SIGNED SCOT 1 R G' Ro:,JyV DATE 7
A.DDRESS k) 3$GW ,Sc.>LLiU~'V PP~ 40'15 PHONE TZY~7,y
<7 PQ k~~U~' . LJ 14 S}~l l~V 6 i DA1 ZIP ~~Z/~
SIGNATURE O APPLICANT OR EPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
~
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS ~v2 DAY OF
1994, BY
1)044 NOTARYSCAL -
Notary Publlc, in and for lhc SLate of Washmgton
Resid,ng at lt~pae&211/
My appoin[mcnl expires ~o
PART V
(T BE COMPLETED BY THE PLASTNING DEPARTMENT
DATE SUBMITTED ~Lf/~y ~
FILE # Zf/ !
DATE ACCEP'TED ~ By al ~
l~
TOTAL FEES ~ RECEIP~/'
,
a.
L Z E 41 9
.
;
~
•
S P O K A N E U N T Y
C'(_ANNING DEPARTMEIVT WALLiS D. HUBBARD, D1RF.CTOR
/
'~KE~,k1 v c.~ ` ,
MEMORANDUM U G 1994' ,
Ccouaq EnBiaeeriag , lTO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering '
Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Deparccnent
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District ;
Wyn Birkenthal., Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department `
Ted Trepaniex, Departiazent of Transpartation
Connie Brady, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
East Valley School District
Spokane Industrial Park Water District
Fire District No. 1
:
FROM: John Pederson, Seaior Planner ~QDATE: August 19, 1994 )
RE: Spokane Industrial Park Zone Reclassification
APPL.ICATIQN ACCEPTANCE AND DESICN REVIEW MEETINC
SEPTEMBER 7. 1994 AT 1:15
CQCINTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM, 2ND FLOOR
Please r+eview the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEP'ra1vCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETIIVG PORM for your comments. ne Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the
attached form to Thomas Veljic for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Planning Department file (so bsing thrgg copies to the meeting). Thanks
for your coopexation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact
Thomas Vel jic of the Planning Depanment at 456-2205.
c: Pentzer Development Corp., 3808 N Sullivan Rd., Bldg. N-15, Spokane, WA 99216
Taylor Eng-ineering, 106 West Missioo, Suite 206, Spokane, WA 99201
Attachments: AppGcacion Acceptance and Design Review Trorm, Project De.sign, Site Plan
~'~.'f_'~i lU~~~ ~RC%D~ti'.~'t:~''E~:VL'E ' `_P~_?~:'."vF., ~ti;i~HINt-.TC~!~ `?`~~f~l~-U~-3U • (`=ii)`)) -}`i6-2';i7
Taylor Engineering, Inc. LETTE R 0 F TRAN S M ITTAL
lf. 108 l~iasion Avenue. Suite ZOa
3pokane, l/aahingtcn 94201 DATS C~4 JOH. N0.
509 928-99T1
_FAX 32e-8224 ATTENTION
T0: ~ RE:
.
1fE ARE SBNDI1`G YOU C! ATTACflSD !~:j UNDER SEPA,RATB GOYSR YU THE FOLLOWING ITELS:
CJ SHOP DRAWINGS C~ PRINT3 O PI.AN3 ~ ANALYSI3 O gpgCMCATiON3
~ COPY OF LBTmR C~ CSAI`CE ORDER ri
COPI&9 DATS N0. ~ D84CRIPTION
ac, gtwlt.
~
THESB ARE SL'BMITI'ED AS CHSCYB'D BEIAII:
Cj FOR APPFtOVAL a AppROVBD A3 SUBMITI'ED C] RE.SUHNIT COPIE.S FOB 1►PPROVAI.
FOR YOUIt USE ~,~~orEn n„s xorEn O 3UHb[T1' COPIES FOR DISTR[HU770N
AS REQUMD ~ RETURNfiD FOIt CORREGTIONS C~ RETURN CORBECTED PRiNTS
1 J FOR RSYIEIf AND COMIiRNT
RF'1,(ARiCC
- ~
~ M
#AgOft
a COPY TO SIGh'ED
~
~ r w - - ~
~
~
~ ~ ~ r &~SA~B ~D+~dL P~ r ~
,
i ~ , ~ w~/4 ~F SE~T~ON 1, T 2~N , R A~ , W~~., ~POKAN~ COUN7r, wA~i~iGTON
I I ~~c~s°~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~,o ~ ~ ,4 ~ a ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , \ ~ ~ ~ ~
t P ~ ~ 4 h e~m ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ , ; ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Fk r~ ~k.k~~,~z~\ ~ ~ ; } ~ ~V ~ ~ 0~ ~ \
~ I ~ _ ~ 4 ~~``k`~ r titi ~ b i} ~ \ . - - -e w ~ - ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ . ~ k m ~ ~ \ ti ~ ~ o \ ~ "`1 ~ - - - - _ _ I s ~ , 4 . ~ d ~
_ -a w,__~ _~k__ti_ _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ r _ ~ _ _ _ ~E ~ i \\~\\~r~~\ k ' '9 W~-._~r..._. _ ' ~ ~ 'l '4 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
r 1SY STR~EF J ~ ~ / ~ a ~------,..-.T-__ _ ~6•~~~p ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~`J.,~~~'u s. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I
' ~ ~ tl ! ~ - ~ - " ~ : :
r - ~ _ _ 1~~ s~ L~ ~ROJEC~ INFORMA~ION I ~ - ' - _ };i ~ ~ -~r-- : : ~ a s,~ ~ ~ . ~ 1~~ ~ ~ , i i Pit~ECT I~/~ 21 5 AC
~ FJ~lSTIFka 2{lUri~t HEAw' INOU5~~1. (h3) I r ~ - - - - - - ~ PaoPa~a mrm~a ~rmusr~~ ~u~c t~-r~ ~ e _ ~ T p Ac~
, ~,_s___t~____________a---_~~~,~,,,, ~ ~itr ausu~s ~e-ak s~~ ~r. ~ f ~ -t- l- ~ -2); 317 JaC.
# ~ - I i - e 0 i _ - {~i}T~NTlAL ~ F~.L4~~ IS 15 L~T 4F AH'~PXTED 5N7WAlED
~ ' ~ ~ I ~ I I I d9E'S ~l~En w11~ ~ RE~ECnvE ~ti~ll~. r ~ I w - I~~~~E E~E ~ ~ ?aF \ 1Ht5 1tS'T 15 N4T I~ilEfmED TO 6kNiIF1' AN i t~ - I j ~ ~kl~fVE LkST OF Il5ES YEC71vE ZiiMFiL. -Mi1Fsf AN
~ ~ cE~-~-~ _ t ~ { i ~ 1 a ~ h4 ~ 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~z 2
i + ~ , ~T ~55#~IB~r O~i1CE I ~ i ~ ~ ` ~ ~ sranon Ha a i
1 i ~ a~ ea~ss _ ~ \ " ~ ~ i ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ RESTkURkHS ~ - _i
~~xa~ ~ , _ ~ I ~ 7?9 89 ~,m ~ ~tnn~ sa~oo~ t HGUe u[PRGdFSdFJtT CE ' ~ - - dF , ` - - ~ ct~t ~aP ( I -
'j[ I ~ ~ I f p _ ~ CAk WA~1 1 C9 i - _ ~ ~ - k 116C. S4RIACfS
o ~ ~ ~ ~ r
_ ¢ ~ ~ n ~ 4~ ~ J i ~ m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t , 4 , ~ ~ . i ~ 7 S71oP
' ~0.~" ~ - J ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ \ iar ~n. ~ cs~r t aoo I~l YIH. FR9PiiAGE. iP5' C9YP~~f td6' b urf,dl
T I ~ n p ~ ~ i~ 4[H. FR01}T 10. 5ET9ACM~. 30' ~CQaPLY 85 f35 ~ i ^ Npl 51DE T0. SE`~9AGC S cpu~r ~E ' ` ■ e S i - • . r
~~,o ~ ~ u~. rt~rt ~D sE1B~ac. t3' cp~r +5' y~ _ ~ t [ ~ ~rUC ELL+~ CCrVEMAE 507C C41tPLY 55% } ~ ~
~ ~ ~ u,~x ein~ ~c~rr ~o' ea~lr sa' ~ ~ ~ PAf~UNQ o au + ~tr ~.au. ~ , k ~ ~ \ ~I~IAGE aJ.L MU. COORDG~fAIED 'rF&t0UG11413T
I ~ ~ PfiOJECT NRQ IYIi BE AllY ~ ~ ~ ~S~~C C~J'$l4T~TI Nrl, ~
~ 1A1~&CAPAIk d{ 41~BG6 E1(~ Cl1. 94 ~ r STCRA~ fFl. 1~,&3D.356 CQ6dPLY CfL 14 ~ ~ ~ i~FlISE SfiRAC~, 0{ 11s~..~6* 4 C4HPLT ~L, 14, ~
~ IIALl.S L1~ 1463a368 ~OLPLY C7~ 9~ I ~ - i ~ Y ~ PUBtlC TRAMI5IT i~i. 10.830.39a t01~i7 f~4 14 ~_¢C_ ~ errr__ _ _m r ~ _ _ _ ~ , ~ ~ _ k li~CfiAbpC10- ~A4~,. ~I 145.iG31G CQ~P~T N~ fi
~ ~ Lf#ITINk CN. 14.~3G.]6D CaYFir NOHE _ y~`~ , ~ ~t+~r a~ t4.sso-.s~ cau~, ucr~
P ~ ~ r ~ Ff I I r~~ ~l 7REA7kE7~IT QI- 14b3&394 ' C{~+PLI" NONf ~ R~ " I I xr a~ se~ R' ~ +u.aU - o~P~D~tC oN Us~
~ V. I ~ ~ ~ ; i \ . n~ ~ ~ ~ I - t ~
~ ~ , ~ I~ f ~ ° ~ ~ L ~ ~r ~oa~as narr AR~'I.~CANI' PE?JTIE}t ~EVf1~iFM CL~~9tA'~DH ~ "4~'~m" 'd , ~ ~ 384d9 SuiiJVl~n ROaD B~.D~ ~-1S
~ t a. i S~ 5POKAN~, YY~4 8921S-9B7~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ " ~ it== =
~ ~ B~G ~y---- 4 I ~ , - - - - -
- ~ I ------n----- c~ ~ a~ac. a~ LEG~~VD - "i__ -f a ~ ~ ` I~ ~ ~ _ rr - - - ~ ~ 1I ~ ~1"~li Lwp - - i L C 1
~ r ~ ~r ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ SEYqd IiAl11WIE ~ PJ1FJ1 PflL.E JL~~_I.i ,p~
~ ~ p GrTiH 9+5+{ I~q+r sq~.E ~ ~ ~~;t Cyyrti ➢Y ~ MCXV + CCIUPLT cx. 44 eo+E t=PLr
~ ~ _ _ F ~ ~ ' ~ ,a wn'FR v~N - - - ~ ~ f ~ ~ - ~ . I ' - ~ I ~ ~ ~ $ NaTfR 91UT f!F - - -B~ w _ - -,,~.~M.~.n ■
1~ i tl ~ ~ m~ u~w~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ v,~rmw~ raum~c R~ ~~.,+r - -c s~~ a~ r~ T
I 1 ~ ,l . 1 ~~s ~ ~n r + ! { i ~ ~ ' ! I ~ ~f ~ ! ■
v~ ~ 1 . ~ u I ~ _ o ~~Z ~t r, ~ - - ~ ~ t-Iimmommallil-. F '~"Yr 1L
~os~h~c ~7xr ~ ~ - - - - _9~ " " ~ ~ * I i ~ ~ - • ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~o5m E7a~r ~~o~o5m ~rnr
_ _ S~Orr~ ~ A~ro _ ~ ~ $ ~n~u F~r
, ~ i rnr .y ' - .z.- =iFa'4r I
I~wSIONS - Taylor ~ngmeer~ng .
S'll ~t0 A0~ ~II$ P~IIL 1i 1Q8 ][f~ou Ape Spoke~ Raztriagtou PB£G1 L
(54P) ~9-9~R Fll~ ~`~M+J 928- ~ L PIONSOMMOMMIL ~ f ' ~ irr, -
G`~1~CEPTUA~ ~TE ~LAN hK3iE. Si7E PLAhI ~S COMCC~P1Il.~l OHLY lT !S S~&IECT
ro c~~cE ~A~ av ~cn~r~ eui~o ~opasa~s. ~ aA~ P~OPQS~D REZOM~ FRDlrll I•
~r~ w. ~.~...r~ ....i.~r~ .~,.,w~.r~, w,~ CK'o- ~ntE TD I--] 1lNU i ar.~ ~ww ~
I
1
r ~
SPOKANE BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL CENTER
PROPOSED REZONE
1994 Traffic Study
DRAFT
~ Prepared: July 6, 1994 By: Jim Borgan
~
Consultant:
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
West 106 Mission Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201
(509) 328-3371 / FAX (509) 328-8224
~
1994 Traffic Study
Preface The following "Executive Summary" is intended to be a descriptive
summary of the traffic study, its results, conclusions, and
recommendations Details and documentation of the process and
procedures as well as more detailed summaries of the available data and
information are provided in the "Technical Summary" and its attachments
The entire set of reports is available for review at the Spokane
County Engineers Office Copies of the entire report or portions
thereof are available at Spokane County Engineers Office, for the cost
of reproduction "
Subsequent to the completion of this Traffic Study, the site plan
was modified The area designated as commercial was enlarged from 12 2
acres to 13 7 acres The area designated as light industrial was
reduced from 9 3 acres to 7 8 acres The commercial zoning designation
was changed from 1113-3" to a less intense "B-2" As this traffic study
assumed a worst case scenario for the commercial zone (130,000 sq ft
shopping center), these modifications to the site plan contained in this
report are not 3udged to be significant and are not incorporated into
this traffic study It should also be noted that, although this study
analyzed the commercial zone as a 130,000 sq ft shopping center, the
Owner has stated their intent is to not construct a shopping center but
rather a mixed use office/commercial/light industrial center
Note: All calculations done for this study, including the
"Technical Summary" and its attachments, were completed
using "real numbers (i e, with decimal places, but most
~ results are presented as integers Consequently, the
results may appear inconsistent due to rosnding
Location Map
I
63CrLaW CIACH RD
~
SPOlCANE x
IAUNICIPAL
a ~ AIRPORT
U F- Proposed
CITY =
Rezone
~ QF ~ gp Site
GAEENA 3
9'RwalE AvE
y ' t + I
S P OKANE $ oPro~iTM =
~
95 291W .%T- v,
0
4 a
w
4 tTl1 A g
Taylor Engineering, lnc 1994 'fraftic Study
S I P.'s PROPOSED REZONE t June, 1994
TABL$ o f CONTffidTS
r PREFACE 1
TABLE of CONTENTS
EXECUT I VE SL;fNIlMARY . 11 ~
TABL$ o f CONTENTS
I STATEMENT of PURPOSE / PROJECT SCOPING 1
II ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES and METHODS 1
III PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1
IV BASE YEAR CONDITIONS 3
A ROADWAY SYSTEM . 3
B CURRENT CONDITIONS 6
C CURRENT TR.AFFIC GENER.ATED by S I P 10
V FUTURE CONDITIONS without the REZONE 11
A PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 11
B FUTURE CONDITIONS without the REZONE 12
VI FUTURE CONDITIONS with the PROJECT 16
A TRIP GENER.ATION of the PROPOSED REZONE 16
B TRIP DISTRIBUTION / TRIP ASSIGNMENT 17
C FUTURE "LEVELS-of-SERVICE" with the PROJECT 18
VII FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 22
$~IBITS
EXHIBIT 1 VICINITY MAP 2
EXHIBIT 2 INTERSECTIONS of KIERNAN & EUCLID with SULLIVAN 4
EXHIBIT 3 INTERSECTIONS of I-90 RAMPS & MISSION w/ SULLIVAN 5
EXHIBIT 4 CURRENT AWDT's 6
EXHIBIT 5 DESIGN HOUR INTERSECTION MOVEMENTS & LOS's 8
EXHIBIT 6 TRIP GENER.ATION for EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 10
EXHIBIT 7 TRIP GENERATION with CURRENT ZONING BUILDOUT 12
EXHIBIT 8 DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES & LOS's w/o REZONE 13
EXHIBIT 9 ESTIMATES of TRIPS GENERATED by the PROJECT 16
EXHIBIT 10 COMPARISONS of S I P OFF-SITE TRAFFIC 17
EXHIBIT 11 FUTURE "LOS's" with the PROPOSED REZONE 18
EXHIBIT 12 ACCESS PLAN for the PROPOSED REZONE 21
Tay.lor Engineering, Inc 3994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 'e PROPOSED BSZQXB .22 June, 1994
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
SIP's PROPOSED R$ZONS
~
1994 Traffic Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STATENKN'r of PIIRPOS$
The purpose of the traffic study is to obtain the data and
perform the analyses necessary to determine the transportation-
related impacts and needs of the proposed pro3ect in its
immediate vicinity and to identify measures needed to mitigate
those impacts The Washington State Department of Transportation
(W S D O T) is requiring the traffic study to determine the
impacts of the proposed rezone to the State Highway System
specifically, Interstate 90's (I-90) ramps from/to Sullivan Road.
The study is also being coordinated with Spokane County As
a result, the study also analyzed operations of intersections
along Sullivan Road
PROJBCT D$SCRIPTION
The portion of the industrial park proposed to be rezoned is
located east of Sullivan Road in the northwest quadrant of the
industrial park The B-2. rezone is being proposed to allow for
ancillary commercial development for the industrial park's
existing employment force (estimated to be about 5,000
employees) The primary purpose of the development will be to
provide convenient services to the employment force (e g,
restaurants, banks, service stations, etc ) However, specific
pro3ects have yet to be identified, consequently, for "worst case
conditions", it was evaluated as a shopping center The
following is a listing of the proposed pro3ect's characteristics
(1) The entire industrial park comprises about 580
acres
(2) The proposed rezone from I-3 to I-1 comprises
about 9 3 acres
(3) The proposed rezone from I-3 to B-9 comprises
about 12 2 acres
(4) In accordance with County zoning, all pro3ects
will be provided parking and 208 per County
requirements
The primary access provided the proposed pro3ect is from/to
Sullivan Road via Kiernan (the industrial park's primary access
point) Secondary access is provided from/to Flora and Euclid on
the east
Taylor Engineering, Inc 2994 Traffic Study
3. I. P. 'a PBOPOSED BSZONS 222 June, 2994
Based on trip rates contained in ITE's TRIP GENERATION, it
, is estimated the industrial park as it presently exists,
generates about 16,700 vehicle trips on an average weekday With
full buildout of its existing zoning, it is estimated the
industrial and business park will generate over 18,000 vehicle
trips on an average weekday With full buildout of its proposed
zoning, it is estimated the industrial park will generate a total
of nearly 26,000 vehicle trips per day However, the results of
the traffic study indicate that, with buildout of the proposed
rezone, 3ust over 29 percent of the average weekday traffic and
about 20 percent of the P M peak hour traffic will be internal
to the industrial park The internal traffic arises from the
convenience offered to employees within S I P by the proposed B-
3 rezone district As a result, the actual increase in offsite
traf f ic (i e , the increase in use of the public roadway system)
between buildout of the proposed zoning over buildout of the
existing zoning is less than one percent during an average week-
day and 3ust over one percent during the P M peak hour
FINDINGS and R$COIrMEJDATIONS
As stated above, the results of the traffic study indicate
the buildout of the proposed rezone has only marginal effects on
operations of public roadways off-site when compared to buildout
of the existing zoning It was concluded the combined impacts of
other approved developments in the vicinity of the industrial
park are substantially more significant The "Sullivan Road
Corridor Study" which was used as a basis for this study of
future conditions analyzed nine pro3ects, in addition to those,
this traffic study included the impacts of Phase I of the
Sullivan Park Center (an approved 650,000 square foot shopping
center)
Furthermore, of the movements at all the intersections
analyzed, the only movements with a def icient levels-of-service
affected by the proposed rezone were the southbound left turn
from Sullivan to the eastbound on-ramp to I-90 and those at
Sullivan and Mission (Northbound Sullivan to I-90 westbound is
also deficient, but the proposed rezone will not affect it)
However, the impact of the rezone is to slightly reduce traffic
at those intersections during the P M peak hour (due to the
difference in trip distribution with the rezone)
Consequently, it was concluded the most appropriate action
will be the provision of the access plan that provides the
portion of the industrial park to be rezoned as B-3 with three
accesses from/to Sullivan (one being the existing main driveway
at Kiernan) Beyond that and in accordance with County
requirements, consideration should be given to implementing
elements of the County's "Commuter Trip Reduction" program (e g,
shared rides, incentives for transit use, staggered work hours,
etc )
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 's PROPOSED BSZQAS i v June, 1994
T a y 1 o r E n q i n e e r i n q, 2 n c.
8 I Pf s P 8 O P O 8 B D 8$ S ON 8
1994 Traff ic Study
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
May 26, 1994
I. STATffiXKNT of PURPOS$ / P80JBCT SCOPING
The purpose of the traffic study is to obtain the data and
perform the analyses necessary to determine the transportation-
related impacts and needs of the proposed project in its
immediate vicinity and to identify measures needed to mitigate
those impacts. The Washington State Department of Transportation
(W.S.D.O.T.) is requiring the traffic study to determine the
impacts of the proposed rezone to the State Highway System
specifically, Interstate 90's (I-90) ramps from/to Sullivan Road.
The study is also being coordinated with Spokane County. As
a result, the study also analyzed operations of intersections
along Sullivan Road.
II. ANALYTICAL PROCBDIIRBS and lSBTHODS
The basic analytical approach followed standardized princi-
pals and procedures described in the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' (ITE) TRANSPORTATION and LAND DEVELOPMENT (T&LD) as
supplemented by the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) NATIO-
NAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 187 (NCHRP 187),
and ITE's TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HANDBODK / 4th Edition. Other
standard references used in this study included, but were not
limited to, the following:
(1) ITEfs TRIP GENERATION;
(2) TRB's 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL / Special
Report 209 (1985 HCM);
(3) The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) MANUAL
on UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES for STREETS and
HIGHWAYS (MUTCD); and,
(4) The American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A POLICY on
GEOMETRIC DESIGN of HIGHWAYS and STREETS.
III. PROJBCT DBSCRIPTION
Exhibit 1, on the following page, is a vicinity map showing
the locatlon of the site. As shown in Exhibit 1, the site is
located east of Sullivan Road in the northwest quadrant of the
industrial park.
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSED RBZONB 1 June, 1994
B~IBIT 1: VICIITITY !AP
5 - J ~ 4 - I
~ -
~
U9 ~
W
~ • ~
m ~
~
t
~
92
~ M ~ 06
Kiernan IF;
I ~ ~ c I 1 ►-3-4~
Proposed S I P Rezone >
Eucliid I~~ o 0 Trw
- - - ~
Q F-l-k-I ID
° ~
O MA
~
s 2
.00 '0 4 ERY
SULUVA/V 0/
y - ~ PARK
INQIANA
r y
< "
J
~ N
c
W ~
40
O~W~Y
PRINGnQJI ~
11 o
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZOXB 2 June, 1994
The rezone is being proposed to allow for ancillary
commercial development for the industrial park's existing employ-
ment force (estimated to be about 5,000 employees) The primary
purpose of the development will be to provide convenient services
to the employment force (e g, restaurants, banks, service
stations, etc ) However, specific pro3ects have yet to be
identified The following is a listing of the proposed pro3ect's
characteristics
(1) The entire industrial park comprises about 580
acres
.
(2) The proposed rezone from I-3 to I-1 comprises
about 9 3 acres
(3) The proposed rezone from I-3 to B-X comprises
about 12 2 acres
(4) In accordance with County zoning, all pro3ects
will be provided parking and 208 per County
requirements
As shown in Exhibit 1, the primary access provided the proposed
pro3ect is from/to Sullivan Road via Kiernan (the industrial
park's primary access point) Secondary access is provided
from/to Flora and Euclid on the east
IV. BA.S$ YSAR CONDITIONS
The analysis of traffic impacts and operations focused on
Sullivan Road from Trent to south of Mission The year 1994 was
selected as the "base year"
A. ROADWAY SYSTffiri
Exhibit 1 shows roadways within the study area,
the following is a summary of Spokane County's "Func-
tional Classification" of the roads
o Trent and I-90 are classified as "State High-
ways"
o Sullivan Road and Flora (on the east) are
classified as Principal Arterials
o Euclid, east of Sullivan, Marietta, and Mission
are classified as Minor Arterials
o Euclid, west of Sullivan, is classified as a
Collector Arterial
Exhibits 2 and 3, on the following pages, schematically
portray existing lane configurations and traffic
control at the critical intersections
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P. I a P80P+O.SED RSZQRK 3 June, 1994
B~IBIT 2: IN'TffitS$CTIONS of HZffitNAN & BIIGZID Vith SIILLIVAN
~
r
I
1
~
~ KIERNAN AVENUE \...MAIN ENTRANCE - 20 mph
_
~ ~ V y
~ A
UNDER
~ TRAFFIC
CONSTRUCTION ~ r ~38 ff
, SIGNAL
A A•+ V
,
~
~
~
E i
Ul) ~ E
~ i
0 ,
Q ~J
O ~
Cd
z
Q ~
J
~
\.,.EUCLID AVENUE - 35 mph
A
A
c
a TRAFFIC
~ 38 ft -
9 r 75 ff.
~
~ r SIGNAL ~ 't
r
A A +i v
~
~
~
~
i
NO
' SCALE
~
~
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traff3c Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD REZOXB 4 June, 1994
I8IT 3: INTffitSBCTIONB of I-90 RAMP8 ~NISSIOIT v/ SIILLIOAN
r V v~ I ~
7RAFFIC ~
SIGNAL
, ■
• ' 4-, ,
A A
~
~
~
. . . . . . . co ~ ~ . . . . . . .
i '
c p
~
I -90 z I -90
~ Q
i >
~ . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . .
i
i
e
TRAFFIC ' E) ~
~ SIGNAL
~
;
~
N
`
\
NO
SCA1F
MISSION AVENUE ~
30 mph J♦, V V~ `
~ TRAFFIC RED LION
48 FT @ DRIVEWAY
SIGNAL
A A/+
\s
Taylor Engineering, Inc. _ 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZONB 5 June, 1994
B. CIIRRENT CONDITIONS
"Average weekday traffic volumes (AWDT's) in the
site's vicinity were obtained from Spokane County for
1991. The AWDT's are summarized in Exhibit 4. Since
$XHIBIT 4 : CCDRRDiT AjiDT's
2210 3772 45 2~22 64~ 3600 I
Hellqsley Ave ~
~756 ~
~ 4128 765 I
I -J~ 1260 122 71L
~
2rd-4 1 Trent Ad ~
~ ~ ~ 11900 276
~ .
(1602
1377
0
~
m
/
Proposed S I P Rezone >
J3ss4 ~ 1757
. 4754
Euclid Ave
3647 21553 2297
Euclid *e ~
~
3793
~
c
~
r
<
d
7
n
600 3625 -t,90 22679 ~ 84Q
' \
~ R, 3904 ~
~ ~ 3775
2339
~
~
4171 25919 •
~
~ 2 91 ~ 533
a ~061 76
L
4279 ~
~ /-~0 ~ BroadNay Ave
70Z3 7574 ~3~ ~ 2930
~ D 23427
~ve f 12 3 ~54 499
~ [Valley►ray Ave ~
1 q 0 T ~a 821
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffzc Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZOXB 6 June, 1994
no traffic counts were available for local streets nor
were turning movement counts available for arterials,
"peak period turning movement surveys" were taken at
the intersections shown in Exhibits 2 and 3
Based on traffic data provided by the County and
W S D O T, it was determined the peak hour of traffic
in the site's vicinity is in the evening Consequent-
ly, it was selected as the "design hour", and the "peak
period turning movement surveys" were taken between
3 00 P M and 6 30 P M
The standard procedures for determining operating
conditions estimate "levels-of-service (LOS's)"[1]
The "ideal" capacity of a typical roadway is 1,800
vehicles per hour (vph) per lane [21
The worst congestion on roadways usually occurs at
intersections where competing traffic flows (e g, left
turns -vs- opposing movements, etc )"share" the
roadway's capacity Capacity analyses were performed
using "Highway Capacity Software", computerized
implementations of procedures contained in HCM85
Exhibit 5, on the next two pages, summarizes the
peak hour results of the turning movement survey as
well as the results of the capacity analyses using the
"Highway Capacity Software" (HCS) Attachment "TM"
contains listings of the actual data collected during
~ the surveys, Attachment "CA" contains the actual output
of HCS As indicated in Exhibit 5, all intersections
along Sullivan Road except Mission are estimated to
experience overall LOS "B", Mission and Sullivan is
[1] "The concept of 'levels-of-service' is defined as a
qualitative measure describing operational conditions within
a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or
passengers A level-of-service (LOS) definition generally
describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed
and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions,
comfort and convenience, and safety Six levels-of-service
are defined They are given letter designations, from 'A'
t o 'F', wit h LOS 'A' representing the best operating
conditions and LOS 'F' the worst HIGHWAY CAPACITY
MANUAL SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D C(August, 1985)
C 21 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL • SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D C(August, 1985)
Taylor Engsneering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. '8 P80FOSED BSZQnTB 7 June, 2994
EXBIBIT 5: DESIGN HOIIR INTERSECTION MOVEMENTS & LOS's
D E S C R I P T I O N o f G R A P H I C
The onowing graphic is edited output of-= 85
which provides summaries of traffsc approaching
each intersection bT movement. Por example
westbound (Wb) Euclid @ Sullivan has s totai
approach volume of 502 vehicles per hour; of
those 113 vph are Wb right turns, 12 vph are Wb
throughs, and the 377 vph are Wb left turns.
The graphic also shows lane configurations. For
example the same app roach hae one Wb ri ght turn
only lane, one Wb through only lane, and one Wb
left turn onlp lane.
Also shown in brackets are estimates of levels-
of-service (LOS) by movement (or groups of move-
ments) those closest to the lane designations,
by each approach those immediatelp negt to the
LOS by movement= and the overall intersection LOS
those shown in the center of the intersection.
For example the Wb right turn only lane and the
Wb through lane are both estimated to have LOS
"A", and t~he Wb left turn lane is es~timated to
have LOS ' B" resulting in an LOS "B~ for the Wb
approach. The overall level-of-servicR tor the
intersection is also estimated to LOS B .
Sb TOTAL Sullivan A 223
610 Wb
1 1 1 ~ 4 TOTAL
~ < 370
~ 143
20 493 97 < d ~
l
Kiernan IB][LOS
B, [B]< ~ A 1
- - - - - - - - [g] - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~>[Bj [B] [B]
BA A
11 A 46 638 44
~ I
TOTAL 1 A
58 >
46 ~ 1 1 1
~ 728
; Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL------------~---------A--113---------
682 Wb
1 1 1 ~ 12 TOTAL
~ < 502
~ 377
10 635 37 < ~
4
b ~
> [BBI[B] A A 1
Euclid [B] A < 1
LOS B + 1
- - - - - - - -A [g] - - - - - - - - -
1 ~>[B] [B] [B]
fl''
B
A
60 A 34 555 123
~ I
TOTAL 22 I A
278 >
196 1 1 2 1
~ 712
; Nb TOTAL
S. I. P. 's RF3.GNE 8 Ji.uie, 1994
EXHIBIT 5: DESIGN HOIIR INTERSECTION MOVEMENTS & LOS's cont
Sb TOTAL Sullivan A 80
1528 1 2 ~ 2 TOTAL
~ < 340
~ 258
578 950
[ j B B, , [A] A 1
I-90 Wb Ramps [B] B<< 1
B 1
LO S v
[B] tBI
~ 323 777
~ A
~ 2 2
I
~ 1100
; Nb TOTAL
----Sb TOTAL------------~------------------------
1208 ~
2 2 1
I
I
1055 153
I-90 Eb Ramps JAI[B]
BLOS
- - - - - - - - [g] - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~ [B]
1 > B [B]
1 ~ B
[CB]
[B]
A A
Eb 213 ~ ~ L> 8A7 368
TOTAL 0 ~
1190 > ~
977 ~ 1 1
1255
Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL------------~---------~---44---------
I
2032 1 1 1 1 6 TOTAL
~ < 24 74
~
234 1749 49 I
[A] D [Ci A
Mission ~C~ LOS [C]< 1
I
- - - - - - - -A [C] - - - - - - - - -
1 ~>[C] [D] [C]
A A
142 A t-> 52 1069 25
E b ~ ~ A
TOTAL 21 ~
230 67 > ~ 1 1 1
~ 1146
; Nb TOTAL
S. I. P. 's PW120M) RFZGINE 9 Jime, 1994
estimated to experience overall LOS "C". Since LOS "D"
is considered acceptable for urban conditions, it was
concluded current operations are very good.
It should be noted the capacity analyses are based
on the actual lane configurations. However, when the
peak period surveys were taken, it was noticed drivers
took advantage of the excess lane widths on both Euclid
and Kiernan. As a result, they effectively operate as
two lane roadways.
C. CIIRRBNT Z'RAFFIC GSgMATBD by S.I.P.
It is estimated the portion of Spokane Industrial
Park already constructed contains about 5,000
employees. Based on trip rates contained in ITE's TRIP
GENERATION, it can be estimated that existing
development produces about 16,700 vehicle trips per day
(vpd) on an average weekday. Of those, 2,450 (nearly
15 percent) occur during the A.M. peak hour, and 2,300
(nearly 14 percent) occur during the P.M. peak hour.
Exhibit 6 graphically portrays the trip generation
estimates for existing development; Attachment "TG"
BXHIBIT 6: TRIP GSbTHRATION for 8%ISTING DSVBLOPlENT
Vehicle Trips by Time of Day
~ A A4 Peak (7--9 AM) 2450 vph
~ 2nd Hlghest AM Peak 2150 vph
~ P M Peak (4-6 PM) 2300 vph
~ 2nd Highest P M Peak 2300 vph
~ Rest of Dsy 7500
AWD'I"s 16700 vpd
2,150
2,300
' ~ ~ ~ ' (129%)
2,450
~ (14 7%)
2,300
-
, r..
R~
f,
~
(44
7,500
Taylor Engineerinq, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZOXB 10 June, 1994
contains the actual output from ITE's TRIP GENERATION
It should be noted that nearly all of the trips
generated by the industrial park are "new" trips (i e,
they would not be generated without the industrial
park)
V. FQTQR$ CONDITIONS without the R$ZON$
Based on discussions with W S D O T and Spokane County, the
year 2000 was selected as the "planning horizon" for the study.
A. PLANNM ROADWAY I1EPROVffi4ENTS
There are several major developments approved for
construction in the general vicinity of the industrial
park The two of primary concern are the "Sullivan
Park Center", a"mixed use" development on a 226 acre
site located between I-90 and the Spokane River and
between Pines and Flora Roads, and "Spokane Valley
Plaza", a"community" shopping center on a 35 acre site
located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection
of Sullivan and Broadway
Trip generation estimates for those two projects
indicate Phase I of Sullivan Park Center (as a shopping
center) will generate a little more than 23,000 vehicle
trips per day on an average weekday, and Spokane Valley
Plaza will generate a little more than 15,000 vpd on an
average weekday (Attachment "TG" provides detailed
summaries) However, according to ITE's TRANSPORTATION
and LAND DEVELOPMENT, between 20 and 40 percent of the
traffic from/to Sullivan Park Center and Spokane Valley
Plaza are "pass-by" or diverted trips (i e, the trips
would be made regardless of the development)
To address the lmpacts of those and other approved
pro]ects, both W S D O T and Spokane County have
identified needed improvements The following is a
listing of those projects in the study area
(1) The widening of Sullivan Road from five
lanes to seven lanes south of I-90's
eastbound ramps (based on recommenda-
tions contained in Spokane County's
"Sullivan Road Corridor Study")
(2) The provision of an additional right
turn lane from the eastbound off ramp to
Mission
(3) The construction of Indiana from Pines
Road to Flora Road (mitigation required
for Phase I of Sullivan Park Center).
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
3. I. P. '8 PROPOSED RBZONS 11 June, 1994
In addition to those projects, Sullivan Park Center's
design for Indiana calls for grade-separation at
Sullivan Road with only "slip" ramps provided to the
westbound ramps from/to I-90
B. FUTOR$ CONDITIONS without the RSZONS
Historically, growth rates in traffic have been
between three and four percent per year for that por-
tion of the Valley surrounding S I P To assure "worst
case condi tions were evaluated, the traf f ic impacts of
Sullivan Park Center and Spokane Valley Plaza were
assumed to be in excess of normal growth rates (similar
to the procedures used in Spokane County's "Sullivan
Road Corridor Study") However, as stated prevlously,
a large proportion of those pro3ects' trips are not
"new" trips but are "pass-by" or diverted trips (i e,
trips that would be made regardless of whether those
developments are constructed)
In addition, estimates of the trips generated by
the buildout of Spokane Industrial Park as it is cur-
rently zoned were also developed Exhibit 7 graphical-
ly portrays the trip generation estimates for existing
development, Attachment "TG" contains the actual output
f rom ITE' s TRIP GENERATION
SXHIBIT 7: TRIP GENBRATION with CURRENT ZOIJING BIIILDOUT
Vehicle Trips by Time of Day
~ A M Peak (7-9 AM) 2888 vph
~ 2nd Highest A M Peak 2329 vph
~ P M Peak (4-6 PM) 2526 vph
~ 2nd Highest P M Peak 2487 vph
n Rest of Day 8048
AWDT's 18058 vpd
2,529
2,526 ^ ~y
(14.0%) 1 Y 2,688
,
2,487 o
~r ~ ♦ i
i
8,048 -
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 's PBOPOSED ItSZQNB 12 June, 1994
Ta estimate "design hour volumes (DHV's)", the
historical relations between AWDT's and DHV's were used
to estimate 2000 DHV's without any additonal projects
(i e, growth in "background" traff ic) Estimates for
approved development (i e, Spokane Industrial Park
buildout without the rezone, Sullivan Park Center, and
Spokane Valley Plaza) were based on estimates of P M
peak hour trips from ITE's TRIP GENERATION, estimates
for other development were based on the "Sullivan Road
Corridor Study"
Using the same procedures as were used for deter-
mining "levels -of -service" in 1994, estimates of
LOS's for the the year 2000 without the rezone were
made, Exhibit 8, below and on the following pages,
summarizes the pro3ections of design hour traffic as
well as the results of the capacity analyses using the
"Highway Capacity Software" (HCS), see Attachment "CA"
=IBIT 8: DSSIGN HOIIR VOLUMES & LOS's w/o R$ZONS
D E S C R I F T I O N o f G R A P H I C
The tollowing graphic is edited output ofHC9 85
which provides summaries of traffic approaching
each intersection bp movement. The gcaphs.c also
shows lane configurations. Also shown n b ack-
ets are estimates of levels-of-service tLOS~ by
movement (or groups of movements), bp each
approach, and the overall xntersection LOS.
For a more complete description with use of
examples, see page 8 of this report.
Sb TOTAL Sullivan A 253
~ t
423 1 1 i 279 TOTAL
~ < 350 882
28 200 195
A
Trent (only 1 1
ramps are shown) o
A
1 ~
A A
122 A L> 626 2A8 487
TOTAL 195 ~
58 > ~
454 ~ 1 1
1391
-Nb TOTAL
~ Sb TOTAL A 376
999 1 1 1~ 7 TOTAL
~ < 624
~
, 143
~
25 824 150
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 'a P80P+OSED leSZONB 13 June, 1994
~
~IBIT 8: DBSIGN HOIIR VOLIIlEB i LOS's v/o RB80NS continued
ullivan
L> I
Kiernan [B][C]l
BNO
[
C]1
OS ~
- - - - - - - - B] - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~>[B] [C] [B]
BA A
~
14 A 87 1002 68
TOTAL 2 I A
103 87 > 1 1
1157
~ Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL ' A 140
1153
1 1 1 ~ 15 TOTAL
~ < 619
~ 464
18 1087 48 1
< I
v v
[BB](B]' [B] A 1
Euclid [D] g < 1
D ~ 1
o~f
- - - - - - - - ~g - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~>[B] [C] [B]
B' A
75 A ~ 111 943 152
Eb A
T L
412 27 > 1 310 ~ 1 2 1
1206
~ Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL ' A 103
2255 ~ r
Wb
1 2 ~ 2 TOTAL
~ < 555
~ 450
733 1522 ~
IB ~E] ' A
A ' 1
I-90 Wb Ramps [C] C<-1
LOS IC d 1
- - - - - - - - [D] - - - - - - - - -
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
3.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZOXB 14 June, 1994
EXHIBIT 8: DBSIGN HOIIB oOLIIlES i I.OS's r/o RB80NE continued
[F] A
[c]
A
~ <<
~ 530 1281
< A
~ 2 2
f
~ 1811
~ Nb TOTAL
~
Sb TOTAL 4
1972 ~
2 2 ~
1
1780 192 ~
I
I-90 Eb Ramps [C][Fl'
D- - - - - - - - ~Cl - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~
1 > CD [D]
1 ~ D [B]
B [A
]
A A
'
263 A ~ 15A8 640
TOTAL 0 ~
1652 > ~ 1 1
1389 ~
2188
Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL ~ A 54
,
3169 1 1 1 ~ 7 TOTAL
~ < 45 106
~
291 2817 61
[AJ F [Bi A
Mission ~P~ [B]<1 1
A - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - tol v
1 v>[F] [D] [B]
AA A
176 A ~ 95 1959 46
I A
TOTAL 26 ~
315 > ~ 1 1 1
113 ~
2100
Nb TOTAL
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RSZONB 15 June, 1994
As shown in Exhibit 8, only the intersection of
Sullivan and Mission has an unacceptable overall level-
of-service (LOS "E", LOS "D" or better is normally
required for urban conditions) However, it should be
noted that many individual movements have very poor
levels-of-service
The levels-of-service were based on the existing
geometry of the intersections with signal phasing opti-
mization based on the pro3ected volumes It should be
noted it was assumed the westbound approach for Kiernan
(i e, S I P ' s main driveway) was restriped as a two
lane road However, to assure "worst case condltions"
were analyzed, it was not assumed any of the other
improvements were made since funding has not been
obtained for them
VI. FD't'URS CONDITIONS with the PROJSCT
Based on the concerns expressed by the public agencies, the
study focused on the amount additional traffic generated by the
proposed rezone and its effects on operations
A. TRIP GSNBRATION of the PROPOSED RSZONS
Exhibit 9 graphically portrays the trip generation
estimates for entire industrial park with the proposed
rezone, Attachment "TG" contains the actual output from
ITE's TRIP GENERATION (It should be emphasized that
since actual pro3ects for the B-3 rezone have not been
identified, the entire B-3 zone was considered as a
130,000 sq ft shopping center to assure "worst case
conditions" were evaluated in the study) As shown in
R IBIT 9: BSTIMAT$S of TRIPS GENBR.ATBD by the PROJBCT
Vehicle Trips by TzmP Qf Day
~ A M Peak (7-9 AM) 2688 vph
~ P M Peak (4-6 PM) 3174 vph
~ Rest of Day 19772 vph
AWDT's 25614 vph
3,174
~ • (12 4°/.)'
.
2,eea
~ ~(t0 4%)
i
(77.2lG)
~
19,TT2 -
~
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 'a PBOPOSED BSZONB 16 June, 1994
Exhibit 9, it is estimated buildout of the entire
industrial park with the proposed rezone will generate
nearly 23,200 vehicle trips per day ( vp d) on an average
weekday. Of those, nearly 2,200 vehicle trips per hour
(vph), or 3ust over 9 percent, occur during the peak
hour.
B. TRIP DISTRIBIITION / TRIP ASSIGNIIiENT
Trip distribution and trip assignments were
produced using "network-based modeling" procedures (see
Attachment "QRS") to determine the net changes due to
the rezone. All the developments for which trip gener-
ation estimates were developed (including those listed
in the "Sullivan Road Corridor Study") were treated as
"special generators" (i.e., when trip ends by purpose
are balanced during trip distribution, no ad3ustments
are made to the estimates for "special generators").
Based on the results of the modeling, it was
determined that between 1.4 percent (during the A.M.
peak hour) and 34.6 percent (during midday) of the
total traffic will be trips "internal" to the indus-
trial park. Just over 29 percent of the average
weekday traffic are expected to be internal, but only
about 20 percent of the P.M. peak hour traffic are.
Attachment "TG" provides summary comparisons.
As a result, the actual increase in off-site
traffic (i.e., the increase in use of the public
roadway system) between buildout of the proposed zoning
over buildout of the existing zoning is less than one
percent during an average weekday and ~ust over one
percent during the P.M. peak hour. Exhibit 10 provides
a comparison for existing -vs- No Rezone buildout -vs-
Rezone buildout.
1R IBIT 10: COMPARISONS of OFF-SIT$ TRAFFIC GENERATSD by S.I.P
~ Exlsting
~ No Rezone Buildout
m Proposed Rezone Buildout
20,000
18~068
/18.7GY /
16.000-
1Z,88 j ~
/
12,664
1o,ooo-
a,ooo- ~ % ~
/2. Of
0=
AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr R.est oi Day AWDT
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD REZONB June, 1994
It should also be noted that commercial
development has a much different orientation of travel
during the "design hour" Most of the traffic
generated by industrial during the P M peak hour is
the "work-to-home" trip (i e, outbound) whereas it is
equally divided (i e, inbound -vs- outbound) for
retail development Consequently, inbound traffic
increases whereas there are slight decreases for out-
bound traffic with the proposed rezone
C. F'OT[TR$ ELSVSLS - o f- S$R`TICS w wi th the PROJSCT
Using the same procedures as were used for the No
Rezone traffic, estimates of "levels-of-service" with
the buildout of the proposed rezone were made for the
year 2000, Exhibit 11 summarizes the results
SXHIBIT 11: FOTOR$ 'LOS's' with the PROPOSED RSZONS
D E S C R I P T I O N o f G R A P H I C
The rollowing graphic is edited output ot NCS 85
which provides summara.es of traffic approaching
each intersects.on by movement. The graphic also
shows lane configurations Also shown in brack-
ets are estimates of levels-of-service (LOS) by
movement (or groups of movements), by each
approach, and the overall intersection LOS.
For a more complete description with use of
examples, see page 8 of this report.
Sullivan
Sb TOTAL ' A 253
1 ~
429 1 1 ~ 279 TOTAL
~ < 893
~ 361
28 206 195 < 1
~
A
Trent (only
ramps are shown)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~
A
122 A ~ 608 270 473
E b A
~$iAL 195 > }j ~ 1 1
464
~ 1351
Nb TOTAL
Y 1~
S103pTAL ~ i A 336 Wb
1 1 1 ~ 6 TOTAL '
< 558
216
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'a PROPOSBD BSZQNS 18 June, 1994
Rx"IBIT ii: FIITIIRB "LOS's•• rith the PROPOSSD RSSONB continued
-------l,l-----
_ <j ===v= - L> - ; ~
, 25 824 181 `
I
Kxernan [B][Cl' B1
] [CVJ C1
[C
LOS ~
- - - - - - - - [g] - - - - - - - - -
1 A>[B] [C] [B]
BA A
~
14 A L> 87 1002 8~
TOTAL 2 ~
I
103 >
87 ~ 1 1 1 '
1171
~ Nb TOTAL
===^Sb TOTAL------------~-------- A 140
1128
1 1 1~ 15 TOTAL
~ < 619
~ 464
1
16 1065 47 < ~
~ v ,
[B][B] gB A 1
t
Euclid [D] B < 1
ID]
- - - - - - - - ~o] ~ - - - - - - - -
B
A
1 V~>[BJ [C] [B]
BA 87 p ;<< 111 95~5 15~
Eb ~
TOTAL 27 ~
414 310 > 1 1 2 1
1218
0 ~ Nb TOTAL
----Sb TOTAL------------~------ A 107
2233 Wb
1 2 ~ 2 TOTAL
~ < 559
450
1
724 1509 j o
J
A A 1
~
I-90 Wb Ramps [C] C< 1
[c] ~ 1
- - - - - - - - tD01 - - - - - - - - -
IF] [AC]
A
~<< 530 1289
~ A
I
~ 2 2 -819
~ Nb TOTAL
~
Taylor Engineerznq, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'9 PROPOSBD RBZOXB 19 June, 1994
/
B~IBIT 11: FD'I'QRS 'LOS's' with the PROPOSED RSZONS continued
Sb TOTAL '
1959 ~
2 2 ~
1
I
v ~
1768 191 ~
I
I
I-90 Eb Ramps [C][F]'
D- - - - - - - - toi C- - - - - - - - -
A
1 1
C
1 > D [D]
~ D
1
[BBI[A]
A A
Eb 264 A ~ 15A5 640
TOTAL 0 ~
1653 > ~ 1 1
1389 ~
~ 2195
~ Nb TOTAL
Sb TOTAL ' A 55
3158 Wb
1 1 1 ~ 7 TOTAL
~ < 107
~ 45
v
290 2807 61 1 ~
[A] F [Bj A Mission ~F~ I, ] 1
OS [B
- - - - - - - - (g~ - - - - - - - - -
A
1 ~>[F] [D] [B]
AA A
176 A 95 1965 46
~
TOTAL 26 ~ A
315 113 > j 1 1 1
2106
; Nb TOTAL
Comparing the levels-of-service as shown Exhibit 11 with those
shown in Exhibit 8, indicate the proposed rezone does not
denigrate operations at any of the intersections analysed from
the No Rezone conditions However, as with the No Rezone
analysis, it was assumed the eastbound lane at Kiernan (the
industrial park's main driveway) would be restriped as two
approach lanes In addition, to enhance levels-of-service on
Sullivan, the construction of two new driveways providing access
from/to Sullivan Road for the B-3 zone should be considered
Exhibit 12 provides a schematic representation of the proposed
site plan showing three driveways As shown in Exhibit 12, the
separation between the three driveways (including Kiernan) would
be over 500 feet.
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
3. I. P. 's P80FOSED BSZOBS 20 June, 1994
EXHIBIT 12: ACCBSS PI.AN for the PROPOSSD ZtB80NE
.
- ~
i
bAlg:
0
iaus A ~0~00¢ ~ Ooi ~ _ -
~ w~e ~s G
a0~-
~
~ ~ fi ~ ttfl,! C~ )l111111~1~4~1~ ~
lEf
111 t i IM ~
~ Q. ~`1~~II~► plll~`t(~.
~ ' ~ i ~ i,~r►~~'' ~
r ~
z 3 ~
o • ~ '
~ w
w p
z ~
~r
1331as A ~ y4, '~^'ti ~ :J 4 I t I f t 1 I ~7
~ ~ I a,
ff lit
S ~ ~ ~ i►~~~ ~
~►~ii ii~i~
Q ii~►►i~ ~
Q. c~ y ~ r
:
W ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i ,
oNNoz H -
~1 li ~
Illtll
I I I ~
.
► l►, 0 c ti
,
aa4aoc~o a~+o¢ a ~ myu
~
Taylor Engineers.ng, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study
S.I.P.'s PROPOSBD RBZOXB 21 June, 1994
VII. FINDINGS and RBCOIrMMdDATIONS
The results of the traffic study indicate the buildout of
the proposed rezone has only marginal effects on operations of
public roadways off-site when compared to buildout of the
existing zoning It was concluded the combined impacts of other
approved developments is substantially more signif icant (The
"Sullivan Road Corridor Study" analyzed nine pro3ects, in
addition to those, the traffic study included the impacts of
Phase I of the Sullivan Park Center )
Furthermore, of the movements at all the intersections
analyzed, the only movements with a deficient level-of-service
affected by the proposed rezone is the southbound left turn from
Sullivan to the eastbound on-ramp to I-90 and those at Sullivan
and Mission (Northbound Sullivan to I-90 westbound is also
deficient, but the proposed rezone will not affect it) However,
its impact is to slightly reduce traffic at those intersections
during the P M peak hour (due to the difference in trip
distribution with the rezone)
Consequently, it was concluded the most appropriate action
will be the provision of the access plan as shown in Exhibit 12
Beyond that and in accordance with County requirements, consider-
ation should be given to implementing elements of the County's
"Commuter Trip Reduction" program (e g, shared rides, incentives
for transit use, staggered work hours, etc )
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study
S. I. P. 's PROPOSRD RBZQNB 22 June, 1994
th
tA
z
W
~
W
~
0
~
H
r
z
~H
~z
W G~
xH
U
0444
Ho
H
• ~N
W
H
~
~
H `
H
N
W
Tayl o,r Erzgirieat eriizg , =rzc _
S_ I_ P_ ' s PROPOSED REZONE
1994 Traffic Study
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
To supplement available traffic counts, "peak period turning
movement surveys" were conducted at the following intersections:
(1) Sullivan Road and Kiernan (Spokane Industrial
Park's main access);
(2) Sullivan Road and Euclid;
(3) Sullivan Road and I-90's northern westbound ramps;
(4) Sullivan Road and I-90's southern eastbound ramps;
and,
(5) Sullivan Road and Mission Avenue
The following is a summary of the observed peak hour turning
movements at those intersections
RBSIILT3 of TURPIA(3 MOVEMEAT SIIRVEYS
INTERSECTION: Sullivan & Kiernan 1994 Peak Hour Counts
NORTH LEG
Total Approaching 610
ThrouThsnS 493
RightgTurns 20
Total Exiting 872
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 58 Total Approaching 370
Lef t Turns 11 Lef t Turns 143
Throughs 1 Throughs 4
Right Turns 46 Right Turns 223
Total Exiting 70 Total Exiting 142
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 728
Left Turns 46
Throughs 638
Right Turns 44
Total Exiting 682
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 1,766
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 1,766
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Euclid 1994 Peak Hour Counts
NORTH LEG
Total Approaching 682
,
ThrouThsns 635
RightgTurns 10
Total Exiting 728
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 278 Total Approaching 502
Left Turns 60 Left Turns 377
Throughs 22 Throughs 12
Riqht Turns 196 Right Turns 113
Total Exiting 56 Total Exiting 182
SOUTH LEG
Total Approachinq 712
ThrouThsns 555
RightgTurns 123
Total Exiting 1,208
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 2,174
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 2,174
Taylor Ehgineerinq, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachnent "'IM"
S. I. P. 's PROFOSED RE7A= 1 June, 1994
RESIILTS of 1'QRNING MOVF.KENT StTRVEYS c on t i nued
INTERSECTION: Sullivan S I-90 Wb Ramps 1994 Peak Hour Counts
N4RTH LEG
Total Approaching 1,528
Left Turns
Throughs 950
Right Turns 578
' Total Exiting 857
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 340
Left Turns Left Turns 258
Throughs Throughs 2
Right Turns Right Turns 80
Total Exiting 903 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching23 1,100
Left Turns 3
RightgTurns 777
Total Exiting 1,208
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 2,968
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 2,968
INTERSECTION. Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 1994 Peak Hour Counts
NORTH LEG
Total Approaching53 1,208
Left Turns I
Throughs 1,055
Right Turns
Total Exiting 1 100
WEST LEG EAS+ LEG
Total Approaching 11190 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns 213 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 977 Right Turns
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 521
Total Approaching 1,255
Left Turns
Right9Turns 3887
Total Exiting 2,032
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,653
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,653
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Mission 1994 Peak Hour Counts
NORTH LEG
Total Approaching 2,032
Left Turns 49 ~
Throughs 1,749
Right Turns 234
Total Exiting 1 255
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 230 Total Approaching 74
Left Turns 142 Left Turns 4
2
Throughs 21 Throughs 6
Right Turns 67 Right Turns 44
Total Exiting 292 Total Exiting 95
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 1,146
Left Turns 52
Throughs 1,069
Right Turns 25
Total Exiting 1,840
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,482
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,482
The remainder of this attachment contains listings of the actual
data as well as peak hour summaries.
,
Taylor Engineerinq, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachrnent "TM"
S. I. P. 's PROFUSM RF',CM 2 June, 1994
J
SIILLIVAN & RIERNAN
,
ACTUAt COUIlTS EASTB4UMD K I ERNAN 1ESTBOUND K I ERNAN MORTHBOUND SUII I VAN SWTHBOUND SUII I VAN
APaIL 28, 94
Start End left Rigfit left Right left Right left Atght
Time Time Turns Thru Turns TOTA15 Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns mru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS TOTAIS
14 45 to 14 SO 1 1 S 4 15 19 3 60 9 72 13 13 112
11 SO to 14 55 2 3 S 5 3 8 8 28 1 31 T 1 8 58
14 55 to 15 0 3 3 8 10 18 4 32 8 44 9 9 11
15 0 to 15 S 3 3 11 22 33 i 32 8 47 9 2 11 94
15 S to 15 10 4 3 Z 3 12 15 3 54 2 59 14 14 95
15 10 to 15 15 1 1 2 1 12 16 4 44 12 60 12 1 13 91
15 15 to 15 20 4 4 29 35 54 5 51 12 68 10 10 136
15 20 to 15 25 2 9 11 19 10 29 3 32 9 44 1 1 91
15 25 to 15 30 1 1 8 8 4 22 34 3 36 2 41 10 10 93
15 30 to 15 35 2 4 6 9 14 23 5 43 1 49 10 13 23 101
1S 35 to 15 40 1 4 S S 51 60 5 66 1 12 3 3 140
15 40 to 15 45 1 6 1 4 21 25 di 1 54 1 1 87
15 45 to 15 SO 1 3 4 1 14 21 4 51 2 63 16 2 18 106
15 50 to 15 55 2 1 3 1 5 12 4 64 3 11 11 1 12 98
15 SS to 16 0 1 2 3 1 9 16 S 44 52 3 1 1 15
16 0 to 16 5 4 1 24 18 42 4 43 3 50 13 1 11 110
16 5 to 16 10 15 11 32 2 93 2 91 4 / 133
16 10 to 16 1 S 1 2 3 6 16 22 3 62 2 61 9 2 11 103
16 15 to 16 20 1 2 3 3 10 13 1 40 2 43 / 4 63
16 20 to 16 25 1 5 6 12 6 18 2 53 1 56 9 9 89
16 25 to 16 30 2 3 5 3 2 5 3 45 7 55 6 1 1 12
16 30 to 16 35 2 1 4 1 35 25 60 / 18 4 86 4 4 157
16 35 to 16 40 1 1 1 3 36 27 63 15 TS 2 2 143
16 40 to 16 45 1 8 9 12 20 32 39 2 41 1 1 83
16 45 to 16 50 3 1 4 8 1 16 23 58 58 2 2 91
16 30 to 16 55 2 2 4 5 1 6 51 1 52 1 7 69
16 55 to 11 0 1 3 4 7 10 11 50 2 52 1 1 14
11 0 t4 11 S 1 1 2 3 13 16 51 3 60 4 4 82
11 5 to 11 10 6 1 S 21 1 51 2 60 2 2 83
11 10 to 11 15 11 10 21 19 4 83 3 3 107
17 15 to 11 20 11 6 il 1 61 1 63 80
11 20 to 11 25 1 1 2 2 4 33 33 2 2 40
17 25 to 11 30 5 2 1 5D SO 2 2 59
11 30 to ti 35 2 2 4 3 1 53 2 55 64
11 35 to 11 40 1 11 18 58 2 60 1 1 19
17 40to1145 2 8 10 31 37 41
TOTALS 35 4 101 110 319 4 484 837 87 11862 111 21066 211 25 236 261
MAX I mum EASTBOUID K I ER1iAN MfSTBM K I ERNAW tJORTHBOU#D Stlll IYAN SOUTNBOIlND. Sllll I YAN
V01lMES
Start End left Right Left Right Left Rigfit left Right
Time Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns T1xm Twns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS TOTALS
15 15 to 16 15 11 1 46 58 143 4 223 378 46 638 44 128 97 20 111 11213
16 30 to 16 45 4 2 13 19 83 12 15S 4 192 6 202 1 1 383
K-FACTORS 16 60 90 418 83
Taylor Engineering, Inc
SIP's PROPOSED REZONE
Attachment "TM" Page 3
SIILLIVAN S EQCLID
. ,
ACTUAL CM EASTBOUIID EUCI ID IIES1BM • EUCI ID Ii0&THBM• S1Al IYAU SOUiHBOUIiD• S11LC IVAN
APR I L 28, 94
Start End left Right left Right Left Right left Right
Time Tia,e Turns Thru Turns TOTAIS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTAtS TOTALS
. . > >
14 15 to 11 50 3 2 11 16 6 1 1 8 15 2 11 3 41 2 52 93
14 50 to 14 55 1 4 5 10 5 4 5 14 11 13 24 1 2S 1 21 15
14 55 to 15 0 3 2 18 23 11 2 3 16 19 11 30 2 42 1 45 114
i5 0 to 15 5 14 6 38 58 23 2 6 31 5 9 14 3 69 1 13 176
15 S to 15 10 8 2 38 48 23 4 21 S 16 21 2 40 3 45 141
15 10 to 15 15 2 1 16 19 9 7 16 4 11 15 47 2 19 99
15 15 to 15 20 6 3 11 20 6 1 4 11 3 13 16 16 2 78 125
15 20 to 15 25 11 11 16 2 18 S 16 21 2 48 1 51 101
15 25 to 15 30 1 4 ll 2S 19 1 4 21 4 14 18 S 41 49 119
15 30 to 15 35 10 5 30 45 36 6 41 3 17 20 9 55 1 65 112
15 35 to 15 40 S 5 19 29 60 10 10 2 10 12 1 32 2 35 146
15 40 to 15 45 12 15 21 31 1 8 40 2 17 19 4 13 1 18 164
15 45 to 15 SO 3 1 12 16 13 1 1 21 2 16 18 S 13 1 49 104
15 50 to 15 55 1 14 15 9 5 14 2 T 9 4 44 48 86
15 55 to 16 0 6 2 13 21 12 1 1 14 2 11 13 2 55 1 58 106
16 0 to 16 S 5 4 11 26 41 21 68 3 8 11 1 61 62 161
16 S to 16 10 5 1 20 26 66 1 21 94 1 4 S 55 55 180
16 10 to 16 15 1 14 15 45 3 9 Sl 3 8 11 2 53 2 51 140
16 15 to 16 20 d 10 14 29 1 1 31 1 S 15 2 63 2 67 133
16 20 to 16 25 1 15 16 10 3 8 21 3 3 6 2 57 59 102
16 25 to 16 30 2 2 8 12 19 10 29 1 1 1 58 59 101
16 30 to 16 35 4 14 18 33 11 44 1 8 9 1 11 12 143
16 35 to 16 40 6 1 20 27 31 2 6 39 S 3 8 1 83 2 86 160
16 40 to 16 45 3 1 10 16 2 18 1 2 3 2 74 16 107
16 45 tu 16 50 2 14 16 12 1 1 20 4 4 1 36 2 39 79
1650 to1655 3 1 10 14 9 1 5 15 S 4 9 2 10 1 13 111
16 SS to 11 0 4 1 11 8 3 11 1 3 4 3 42 2 /7 13
17 0 to 11 S 2 2 15 19 14 9 23 2 4 6 1 48 1 SO 98
11 S to 11 10 2 28 30 13 4 11 3 1 4 1 46 2 49 100
17 10 to il 15 3 12 15 9 2 11 4 3 1 2 73 1 16 109
11 15 to 11 20 1 S 6 5 2 1 14 2 6 8 48 1 49 71
11 20 to 17 25 4 1 11 1 3 10 1 2 3 2 61 1 70 94
11 25 to 17 30 1 1 3 S 6 3 9 5 2 1 2 64 3 69 90
11 30 to 11 35 1 8 9 6 2 2 10 3 3 6 1 44 45 10
11 35 to 11 40 2 2 9 13 11 2 2 15 4 1 5 1 54 2 51 90
11 40 to 17 45 4 9 13 12 2 14 Z 1 3 2 36 6 44 14
TOTAIS 141 51 520 112 681 32 223 942 141 261 402 131,913 41 21063 41053
MAXIMm EASTBOItIID EtK:IID IPESTBOUND EUCl10 WOR1HBOl►ND SULLIYAN SOllTHBOU!!D Sl1LLIVAII
YOLIQffS
Start End left Right left Right left Right left Right
T}me Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS TOTALS
~ •
15 25 to 16 25 60 22 196 278 311 12 113 502 34 123 151 31 635 10 682 11619
16 0 to 16 15 11 S 51 61 158 4 57 219 1 20 21 3 169 2 114 481
K-FACTORS 104 51 145 98 83
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
SIP's PROPOSED REZONE
Attachment "TM" Page 4
SIILLIVAN & I-90's WESTBOIIND RAMPS
ACTUAL COIiNTS XESTBOUiA di1-Rff MESTBM• OFf •kW IlORTF{OItND Slfll I YAW S8i11}SOUHD • Sl1LL i YAW
r i 127, 94
Start End left Ri9ht left Right left Right left Right
Time Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Twns Thru Turns TOTAIS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS TOTALS
15 30 to 15 35 26 1 33 21 ?1 12 46 118 112
15 35 to 15 40 18 2 4 24 35 35 104 TI 178 231
15 40 to 15 45 12 8 20 35 35 110 81 191 ?46
15 45 to 15 50 21 6 21 47 41 68 48 116 190
15 SO to 15 55 11 4 21 25 25 66 41 101 153
15 55 to 16 0 19 8 21 22 22 63 21 90 139
16 0 to 16 5 22 S 27 24 24 87 42 129 180
16 S to 16 10 31 6 43 14 14 93 SS 148 ?05
16 10 to 16 15 40 8 48 ?2 22 96 65 161 231
16 15 t4 16 20 17 10 21 31 31 82 31 119 117
16 20 to 16 25 19 S 24 11 ll SS 26 81 1??
16 25 to 16 30 19 10 29 21 ?1 53 30 83 133
16 30 to 16 35 11 6 23 30 30 13 52 125 178
16 35 to 16 40 15 1 22 32 32 105 71 116 ?30
1640 to 16 45 36 1 6 13 31 31 70 SS 125 199
16 45 to 16 SO 15 11 26 15 15 111 ?5 136 177
16 SO to 16 SS 28 S 33 ?1 21 60 21 81 141
16 SS to 17 0 10 1 11 24 24 62 21 83 124
17 0 to 17 S 33 6 39 48 48 61 34 96 183
11 S to 11 10 ?3 S 28 23 23 76 34 110 161
17 10 to 11 15 ?8 6 34 21 21 91 36 121 182
17 15 to il 20 22 9 31 35 35 56 23 19 145
17 20 to 11 25 28 12 40 39 39 49 23 1? 151
11 25 to 11 30 14 8 22 36 36 61 31 92 150
11 30 to 11 35 ?2 11 33 22 22 83 14 97 152
17 35 to 11 40 12 1 19 33 33 54 42 96 148
11 40 to 11 45 14 10 ?4 31 31 11 22 93 148
11 45 to 11 50 16 8 24 35 35 52 16 68 121
11 SO to 11 SS 18 11 ?9 31 37 52 28 80 146
11 55 to 18 0 11 9 20 30 30 55 11 66 116
18 0 to 18 S 10 3 13 30 30 51 11 14 111
18 5 to 18 10 16 6 22 ?9 29 36 21 65 116
18 10 to 18 15 6 1 1 41 41 31 15 52 100
la 15 to 18 20 20 6 26 21 21 SS 13 68 115
18 20 to 18 ?S 11 7 24 20 20 46 15 61 105
18 25 to 18 30 11 S 22 19 19 25 9 34 15
TOTALS 0 115 3 253 911 11023 11023 29450 1,233 3, 683 7, 366
,
MAX I M{M WESTBOUIID OH-AAMP MESTBOUND Of F-RAliP IiORTFIBWND SULL I VAN SBUDfBOUl1D SllLL I VAN
VO1lMES
Start End left Right left Right left Atght left Right
Tiae Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTAIS Turns Ti►ru Turns TOTALS TOTALS
15 35 t4 16 35 0 258 2 80 310 323 323 950 518 11528 2,191
15 35 to 15 50 0 51 2 18 11 111 117 ?8? 103 485 673
K-FACTOAS N/A 120 69 19 81
Taylor Engineering, Inc
SIP's PROPOSED REZONE
Attachment "TM" Page 5
- SIILLIVAN & I-90's EASTBOUND RAMPS
AC1UAl OOllilTS EAST64lW• OFF-RAMP NESTBOUTA 7771 NORT}i60uND SULIIYAN SOItINM SUILIYAN
APR 1l 27, 94 1
Start End Left Rigfit left Right left Right left Right
Time Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTAIS Turns Thru Turns TOTAIS Turns Thru Turns T4TAlS TOTALS
15 30 to 15 35 34 54 86 18 33 1 111 ~ 24 24 ~ 223
15 35 to 15 40 20 35 55 93 20 113 20 20 188
15 40 to 15 45 36 83 119 111 23 110 29 29 288
15 45 to 15 SO 24 21 51 63 33 96 18 18 165
15 SO tc 15 55 16 66 82 63 34 95 14 14 191
15 55 to 16 0 18 63 81 78 34 112 10 10 203
16 0 to 16 5 17 Sl 74 59 21 86 11 11 111
16 S to 16 10 19 69 88 16 32 108 19 19 215
16 10 to 16 15 12 49 61 64 21 85 14 14 160
16 15 to 16 20 22 11 96 19 35 114 15 15 225
16 20 to 16 25 16 15 91 11 26 97 20 20 208
16 25 to 16 30 15 54 11 TS 26 101 10 10 182
16 30 to 16 35 15 SS 70 68 28 96 17 ti 183
16 35 to 16 40 19 71 96 88 34 122 21 21 239
16 40 to 16 45 16 64 80 12 22 94 12 12 186
16 45 to 16 50 13 86 99 67 30 97 14 14 210
16 SO to 16 55 31 106 131 60 21 81 12 12 236
16 55 to 11 0 15 64 19 63 31 100 13 13 192
11 0 to il S 21 49 10 61 34 101 13 13 184
17 5 to 11 10 14 91 105 88 24 112 12 12 229
11 10 to 11 15 16 109 125 61 21 91 15 15 234
17 15 to 11 20 14 SI 148 80 26 106 6 6 220
11 20 to 17 25 14 71 85 88 52 140 8 8 233
11 25 to 11 30 25 16 101 70 24 94 10 10 245
11 30 to 11 35 15 90 105 11 31 108 11 11 230
17 35 to 11 40 16 53 69 63 30 93 11 11 173
11 40 to 11 45 10 49 59 79 33 112 13 13 184
17 45 to li SO 11 60 71 81 10 107 4 4 182
11 50 to 11 55 10 38 48 11 42 113 T 1 168
iT 55 to 18 0 11 39 56 55 19 14 14 14 144
18 0 to 18 S 14 48 62 18 28 106 9 9 171
18 S to 18 10 15 46 61 13 31 104 9 9 114
18 10 to 18 15 10 31 41 68 21 89 6 6 136
18 15 to 18 20 11 29 40 54 21 75 10 10 125
18 20 to 18 25 5 35 40 38 23 61 9 9 110
18 25 to 16 30 8 38 46 45 16 61 10 10 111
TOTAIS 604 2, 206 2, 810 0 ?1SSI 1, 022 39604 482 482 482
,
!UX I MUM EASTBOUND OFF-RAMP !(ESTBOUND NORTNMM Slill I YAN SOUTNBOUND SUII I VAlI
vaLKs
Start End left Right left Right Left Rtght left Right
Tioe Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS TOTALS
, .
16 35 to 11 35 213 911 10190 0 881 358 1,255 153 153 21598
15 30 to 15 45 90 112 262 0 288 16 364 13 13 699
K-FACTORS 114 N/A 86 52 93
Taylor Engineering, Inc
SIP's PROPOSED REZOHE
Attachment "TM" Page 6
.
SIILLIVAN & MISSION
ACTUAL COltllTS EASTBOU1iD MISS ION MESTBOUID Rm L 1011 NORTtfBW S1A.L IVAN SUi1TN64Ul1D SUll IVAN
APR f l 27, 94
Start End left Rigfit left Rigfit left Right left Right
Time Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns Tha Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTAIS TOTALS
15 30 to 15 35 15 10 25 2 2 10 1 11 1 30 31 69
15 35 to 15 40 20 2 11 33 1 1 5 1 3 2 S 2 21 23 68
1S40to1545
15 45 to 15 SO 15 6 21 1 2 25 28 25 25 74
15 50 to 15 55 26 2 3 31 3 2 5 10 3 3 Y 26 28 12
15 55 to 16 0 15 2 4 21 2 1 2 S 1 1 Y 4 18 22 50
16 0 to 16 S 10 10 20 1 4 S 8 8 33
16 S to 16 10 19 3 24 7 7 2 1 3 30 30 62
1610to1615 10 3 13 1 4 S 1 1 3 18 21 40
16 15 to 16 ?0
16 20 to 16 25 28 1 9 38 5 1 9 5 S 1 15 12 14
16 25 to 16 30 10 3 13 S 9 14 2 2 7 18 25 54
16 30 to 16 35 11 2 3 16 2 1 6 2 2 3 12 15 39
16 35 to 16 40 16 1 4 21 1 4 4 1 11 2 13 2 11 19 60
16 10 to 16 45 10 9 T 26 3 3 6 2 Y 4 24 24 60
16 45 to 16 50 12 1 3 16 3 1 4 3 1 4 4 26 30 54
16 50 to 16 55 S 4 9 1 1 6 8 4 t 8 21 29 SO
16 SS to 17 0 12 1 3 16 1 4 5 6 1 1 9 18 21 SS
11 Otoll 5 11 1 1 13 1 4 S 6 2 8 2 16 18 44
17 S to 11 10 10 1 9 20 2 1 3 6 1 1 2 18 18 46
li 10 to 11 15 20 13 33 1 1 2 S 3 8 3 11 20 63
li 15 to 17 20 10 1 4 15 2 2 S 9 2 3 S 2 22 24 53
17 20 to 11 25 9 6 15 1 4 S 6 4 10 9 22 31 61
ll 25 to 11 30 16 4 S 25 4 6 10 3 3 6 5 11 22 63
11 30 to il 35 11 2 8 21 4 3 7 3 3 6 5 16 21 55
11 35 to 11 40 12 2 5 19 4 2 6 4 2 6 5 20 25 56
1140 to17 45 14 2 4 20 2 4 6 3 3 6 19 25 SI
17 45 to 11 54 1 4 11 4 5 9 3 3 6 S 18 23 49
1150 to17 SS 8 1 9 3 1 2 6 3 3 3 12 15 33
lT SS to 18 0 S 1 5 14 1 3 4 3 1 4 3 8 11 33
18 0 t418 S 10 6 16 3 1 S 9 3 4 T 2 8 10 12
18 S to 18 10 11 1 4 16 1 3 4 3 3 3 9 12 35
18 10 t4 18 15 4 4 8 2 1 6 9 1 1 S 3 9 12 34
1815to1830 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 3 10 13 26
18 20 to 18 25 5 1 12 2 1 4 1 2 1 3 11 8 19 41
18 25 to 18 30 11 7 18 4 1 1 11 S S 10 1 10 11 51
TOTALS 416 31 180 633 69 23 156 248 116 41 163 129 586 715 1, 301
MAX I MUM EASTBOUND M I SS I OH MESTBM RED L I 0N WORTF{SOUi1D SULL ! VAl1 SOUT}i60U11D SUII { VAW
VOIUMES
Start End left Right left pigf►t Left Right left Right
Ttrae Time Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns T1tiru Turns TOTALS Turns Thru Turns TOTALS Turns T1ru Tttrrts TOTALS TOTALS
16 35 to 11 35 142 21 67 230 ?I 6 44 14 52 25 11 49 231 283 664
15 45 to 16 0 56 4 13 13 6 5 32 43 4 1 S 6 69 75 196
K-FACTO#tS 19 43 3 85 94 85
Taylor Engineering, Inc
SIP's PROPOSED REZONE
Attachment "TM" Page 7
v1
.1
W
.
~a
~
Hz
z~
W
xH
UH
~U
H~
Ha
U
Tayl or Erzgirieerirzg , Iric _
S_ I_ P_ ' s PROPOSED REZONE
1994 T~EE1= StisdY
CAPACITY IiK1LLY SE 8
June 3, 1994
INTRODIICTIONfOVERVIEW
The standard process for determining operating conditions
estimate "levels-of-service (LOS's)11111 The "ideal" capacit of
a typical roadway is 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph) per lane~2]
The worst congestion on roadways occurs at intersections where
competing traffic flows (e.g , left turns -vs- opposing
movements, etc ) "share" the roadway's capacity
Capacity analyses were performed using the "1985 Highway
Capacity Software (HCS85)", computerized implementation of the
procedures and parameters contained in the Transportation
Research Board's (TRB) 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL• Special
Report 209 (HCM85) Capacity analyses were performed for the
"directional design hour volumes" (DDHV's) without and with the
proposed pro3ect:
The remainder of this attachment is the summary output of HCS85.
~
"The concept of ' 1 eveI s-of -servi ce' is defined as a
qualitative measure describing operational conditions within
a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or
- passengers A 1 evel -of-service (LOS) definition general ly
describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed
and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions,
comfort and convenience, and safety Six levels-of-service
are defined They are given letter designations, from 'A'
to 'F', with LOS 'A' representing the best operating
conditions and LOS 'F' the worst "--HIGHWAY CAPACITY
MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D C(August, 1985)
[2) HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, D. C(August, 1985).
~
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attactune.nt "C,A"
S. I. P. 's mOs rAED RF1,GIlE 1 .Time, 1994
CIIRRSNT DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLUMES
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) Kiernan (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst• TEI File Name: SUL&KIER.HC9
Area Type• Other 6-2-94 PM Peak
Comment• Current Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's)
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
-
~
, -
,
No Lanes i > 1 < ; > 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 11 1 46; 143 4 223; 46 638 44; 97 493 21
Lane Width ; 12 0 ; 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 ;12.0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 15; 74; 18; 7
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * ; NB Lef t *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right * ; Rs.ght *
Peds * ; Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 12A ;Green 7A 14A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3 0
Cycle Length: 45 secs Phase combination order• $1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• Ado Sat v/c g/c Approach•
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1411 408 0.11 0.29 7.6 B 7 6 B
wB LTR 1461 422 0 74 0 29 13 3 B 13 3 B
NB L 1624 289 0 17 0 18 11 9 B 7 8 B
TR 3399 1133 0 65 0 33 7 5 B
SB L 1624 289 0 35 0 18 12 7 B 6 9 B
TR 3405 1135 0 49 0.33 5 8 B
Intersection Delay = 8 4(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Taylor Ehgrlneering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachrnent "CA"
S. I. P. 's RFZCNE 2 Jt.uie, 1994
C[TRR$NT DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLOME3 continued
HCM. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) Euclid (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: SUL&EUCL.HC9
Area Type: Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment: Current Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's)
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
- -I
, , ~
~
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 1 ; 1 2 1 ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 60 22 196; 377 12 113; 34 555 123; 37 635 10
Lane Width ; 12 0 112 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 65; 38; 41; 3
Signal Operations
Phase combinatzon 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ; NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Lef t * ; SB Lef t *
Thru * ; Thru *
Right * ; Right *
Peds * ; Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 30A ;Green 22A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length• 60 secs Phase combination order• #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Ad] Sat v/c g/c Approach.
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1402 724 0 31 0.52 5.5 B 5.5 B
WB L 1310 677 0.59 0.52 8 6 B 7 9 B
T 1755 907 0.01 0.52 4.6 A
R 1492 771 0 10 0 52 4 8 A
NB L 749 287 0 13 0 38 9 1 B 6 6 B
T 3510 1346 0 46 0.38 6.6 B
R 1492 572 0.15 0.38 5.7 B
SB L 755 289 0.13 0.38 9 2 B 7.1 B
TR 3505 1344 0.53 0 38 6.9 B
Intersection Delay = 6 9(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Tayl or E-igineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's rnuruNw RFZCNE 3 June, 1994
ti
R
CIIRRENT DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLUMES continued
HCM. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) I-90 North (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name• SUL&I90N.HC9
Area Type• Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
~
, , ~ -
,
No. Lanes 1 > 1 1; 2 2 ; 2 1
Volumes 258 2 80; 323 777 ; 950 578
Lane Width ; 112 0 12 0 12 0112.0 12 0 ; 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 27; 0; 193
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left ; NB Left *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right * *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left * ; SB Left
Thru * ; Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
IVB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right *
Green 15A ;Green 9A 24A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3.0
Cycle Length• 60 secs Phase combination order• #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach•
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB L 1492 398 0.29 0.27 13.4 B 10.8 B
LT 1495 399 0.39 0 27 11.9 B
R 1492 1020 0 05 0 68 2 0 A
NB L 3229 538 0 66 0 17 19.9 C~ 7.7 B
T 3510 2223 0 39 0 63 2 6 A
SB T 3510 1462 0 72 0 42 8 7 B 8.7 B
R 1492 622 0 65 0 42 8.8 B
Intersection Delay = 8.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's rmurucau REZM 4 June, 1994
CIIRRENT DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLIIMES continued
HCM. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) I-90 South (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: SUL&I90S HC9
Area Type: Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment: Current Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's)
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
~ , , ,
No Lanes ; 1 1 < 1 2 1 ; 2 2
Volumes ; 213 1 977; ; 887 368; 153 1055
Lane Width 112.0 12 0 12 0; ; 12.0 12 0;12 0 12.0
RTOR Vols ; 329; ; 123; 0
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Lef t * ; NB Lef t
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left ; SB Left *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right
Peds Peds * *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 18A ;Green 12A 18A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3 0 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order• #1 #5 #6 _
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 1492 472 0.47 0.32 13 1 B 14 5 B
TR 1492 472 0 72 0 32 14 9 B
R 1492 472 0 72 0 32 14 9 B
NB T 3510 1112 0 88 0 32 16.3 C 14.7 B
R 1492 472 0 55 0 32 8.6 B
SB L 3229 700 0 24 0 22 14 8 B 5 2 B
T 3510 2047 0.57 0.58 3.9 A
Intersection Delay = 11 0(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Taylor EhgZneering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's BEZCflE 5 June, 1994
CtTRRENT DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLIIMES continued
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) Mission (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst• TEI File Name: SUL&MSSN.HC9
Area Type: Other 6-2-94 P.M. Pk
Comment• Current Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's)
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
----I I
, , , ----I
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; > 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 2 1
Volumes ; 142 21 67; 24 6 44; 52 1069 25; 49 1749 234
Lane Width ; 12 0 ; 12 0 _1112 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 22; 15; 8; 78
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ;NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left * *
Thru Thru * *
Right Right * *
Peds Peds * *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 19A ;Green 12A 32A 11A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4 4
Lost Time 3.0 ;Lost Time 3 0 0 0 3.0
Cycle Length 90 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach•
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1474 328 0.67 0.22 23 7 C 23 7 C
WB LTR 1410 313 0.19 0 22 18 4 C 18 4 C
NB L 1667 222 0.25 0 13 26 7 D 18 1 C
TR 3499 1400 0 86 0 40 17 7 C
SB L 1667 463 0 11 0 28 18 4 C 24 9 C
T 3510 1911 1.01 0 54 26 7 D
R 1492 812 0.20 0.54 5 0 A
Intersection Delay = 22 4(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
,
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachrnent "CA"
S. I. P. 's Pt~O- RE'1,GNE 6 Ji,u1e, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLIIMES with NO REZONE
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) Kiernan (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name S&KIERNO HC9
Area Type Other 6-2-94 PM Peak
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with No Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
- -
-
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 14 2 87; 241 7 376; 87 1002 68; 150 824 25
Lane Width ; 12 0 1112 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 29; 125; , 23; 8
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ;NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 15A ;Green 9A 24A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Tzme 3 0 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group, Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB bTR 1263 337 0 23 0 27 11 2 B 11 2 B
WB L 1597 426 0 60 0 27 16 2 C 15 8 C
TR 1500 400 0 68 0.27 15 4 C
NB L 1624 271 0 34 0 17 17 1 C 11 7 B
TR 3399 1416 0 82 0 42 11 3 B
SB L 1624 271 0 58 0 17 19 9 C 9 8 B
TR 3410 1421 0.65 0 42 8 1 B
Intersection Delay = 11 7(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROP0.SF~ RFZCWE 7 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLIIMES with NO REZONE continued
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) Euclid (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name S&EUCLNO HC9
Area Type Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with No Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
-
,
1Vo Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 1 ; 1 2 1 ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 75 27 310; 464 15 140; 111 943 152; 48 1087 18
Lane Width ; 12 0 1'12 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 103; 47; 51; 6
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ; NB Lef t *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds , Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 26A ;Green 26A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adi Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB bTR 1406 633 0 51 0 45 8 1 B 8,1 g
WB L 1143 514 0 95 0 45 32 0 D 27 1 D
T 1755 790 0 02 0 45 5 9 B
R 1492 671 0 15 0 45 6 3 B
NB L 360 162 0 72 0 45 19 9 C 8 4 B
T 3510 1580 0 66 0 45 7 5 B
R 1492 671 0 16 0 45 4 6 A
SB L 396 178 0 29 0 45 8 2 B g 7 B
TR 3505 1577 0 77 0 45 8 7 B
Intersection Delay = 11 7(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
TayIor Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROP0.M) A!FVM 8 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLIIMES with NO REZONE continued
HCM• SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) I-90 North (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S&I90NNOHC9
Area Type: Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment• 2005 Directional Desiqn Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with No Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
No. Lanes 1 > 1 1; 2 2 ; 2 1
Volumes 450 2 103; 530 1281 ; 1522 733
Lane Width ; 12 0 12.0 12 0;12 0 12 0 ; 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 34; 0; 244
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left ; NB Left *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right * *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left * ; SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right *
Green 23A ;Green 15A 40A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3.0 3.0
Cycle Length 90 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• AdD Sat v/c g/c Approach•
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB L 1492 398 0.60 0.27 23 6 C 19 3 C
LT 1494 398 0 60 0 27 20 1 C
R 1492 1078 0 07 0 72 2.4 A
NB L 3229 574 1 02 0 18 62.6 F 21 7 C
T 3510 2340 0 60 0.67 4.8 A
SB T 3510 1599 1 OS 0.46 40 1 E 33 8 D
R 1492 680 0 76 0 46 13 4 B
Intersection Delay = 27 0(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
Taylor Ehqineering, Inc 1994 Tratfic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I.P. 's Pl~PO~S~ REZCt1E 9 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLUMES with NO REZONE continued
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) I-90 South (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name• S&I90SNO HC9
Area Type• Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with No Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
- -
No Lanes ; 1 1< 1 2 1; 2 2
Volumes ; 263 1 1389; ; 1548 640; 192 1780
Lane Width ;12 0 12 0 12 0; ; 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 463; ; 213; 0
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ; NB Lef t
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left ; SB Left *
Thru ; Thru *
Right ; Right
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 25A ;Green 42A
Yel l ow/A-R 4 ; Ye1 1 ow f A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 75 secs Phase combination order• #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c gfc Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 1492 517 0 54 0 35 15 8 C 28 1 D
TR 1492 517 0 95 0 35 31 8 D
R 1492 517 0 94 0 35 31 2 D
NB T 3510 2012 0 85 0 57 9.9 B 8 9 B
R 1492 855 0 53 0 57 4 9 A
SB L 328 188 1 13 0 57 116 3 F 27 6 D
T 3510 2012 0 98 0 57 18 1 C
Intersection Delay = 20 5(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
TayIor Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachme,nt "GA"
S. I. P. 's PkOP0.SM REZGtiE 10 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOIIR VOLUMES with NO REZONE continued
HCM' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) Mission (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst• TEI File Name• S&MSSNNO.HC9
Area Type• Other 6-2-94 P M Pk
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with No Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
, - - -
, - -
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; > 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 2 1
Volumes ; 176 26 113; 45 7 54; 95 1959 46; 61 2817 291
Lane Wldth ; 12 0 ; 12 0 112 0 12 0 112 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 38; 18; 15; 97
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ;NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
, Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 9A ;Green 43A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #S
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• Ad] Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB bTR 1539 256 1 13 0 17 98 5 F 98 5 F
WB LTR 1444 241 0 38 0 17 14 8 B 14 8 B
NB L 163 120 0 84 0 73 29 5 D 5 9 B
TR 3553 2606 0 84 0 73 4 8 A
SB L 163 120 0 54 0 73 6 2 B 80 0 F
T 3564 2614 1 19 0 73 86 6 F
R 1515 1111 0 18 0 73 1 2 A
Intersection Delay = 51 8(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E
,
Taylor Engineer2ng, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROPOSM RF.lGME 11 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN AOIIR VOLIIMES with REZONE
HCM' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) Kiernan (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name S&KIERRZ HC9
Area Type Other 6-2-94 PM Peak
Comment• 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; 1 1 < 2 < ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 14 2 87; 216 6 336; 87 1002 82; 181 824 25
Lane Width ; 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 29; 1?5; 27; g
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ;NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right * - ; Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 13A ;Green 11A 24A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0 3 0
Cycle Leiigth 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• Ad3 Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1326 309 0 25 0 23 12 2 B 12 2 B
WB L 1633 381 0 60 0 23 17 4 C 16 7 C
TR 1500 350 0 65 0 23 16 0 C
NB L 1624 325 0 28 0 20 15 6 C 11 8 B
TR 3394 1414 0 83 0 42 11 5 B
SB L 1624 325 0 59 0 20 18 6 C 9 9 B
TR 3410 1421 0 65 0 42 8 1 B
Intersection Delay = 11 9(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
TayIor Ehg3nEering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachrnent "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROPOSED AFIClVE 12 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOUR VOLIIMES with REZONE continued
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) Euclid (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name S&EUCLRZ HC9
Area Type Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
,
No Lanes ; > 1 < 1 1 ; 1 2 1 ; 1 2 <
Volumes ; 87 27 310; 464 15 140; 111 955 152; 47 1065 16
Lane Width ; 12 0 112 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 103; 47; 51; 6
Sigizal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
E3 Left * ; NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
, Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 26A ;Green 26A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1400 630 0 54 0 45 8 3 B 8 3 B
WB L 1140 513 0 95 0 45 32 5 D 27 5 D
T 1755 790 0 02 0 45 5 9 B
P. 1492 671 0 15 0 45 6 3 B
NB L 375 169 0 69 0 45 17 8 C 8 2 B
T 3510 1580 0 67 0 45 7 6 B
R 1492 671 0 16 0 45 4 6 A
SB L 388 175 0 28 0 45 8 1 B 8 4 B
TR 3505 1577 0 75 0 45 8 5 B
Intersection Delay = 11 7(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
T
Tayl or EYigineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PlaOF~OSFF~ RFZUNE 13 Jw1e, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOOR VOLUMES with REZONE continued
HCM. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
~ Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) I-90 North (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst: TEI File Name: S&I90NRZ.HC9
Area Type. Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment: 2005 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
, - -
~
No Lanes 1 > 1 1; 2 2 ; 2 1
Volumes 450 2 107; 530 1289 ; 1509 724
Lane Width ; ;12 0 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0 ; 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; ; 36; 0; 241
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 ~ 7 8
EB Lef t ; NB Lef t *
Thru ; Thru * *
Right ; Right * *
Peds Peds * *
WB Left * ; SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right *
Green 23A ;Green 15A 40A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0 3 0
Cycle Length 90 secs Phase combination order• #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad] Sat v/c g/c Approach.
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
,
WB L 1492 398 0.60 0 27 23 6 C 19 2 C
LT 1494 398 0 60 0 27 20.1 C
R 1492 1078 0 07 0 72 2 4 A
NB L 3229 574 1.02 0 18 62 6 F 21 6 C
T 3510 2340 0 61 0 67 4 8 A
SB T 3510 1599 1 04 0 46 37 5 D 31 8 D
R 1492 680 0 75 0 46 13 2 B
Intersection Delay = 26 0(sec/veh) Intersectlon LOS = D
Taylor Erigrineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROPiOSID REZC1E 14 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOUR VOLIIMES with REZONE continued
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) I-90 South (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst TEI File Name S&I90SRZ HC9
Area Type Other 6-3-94 PM Peak
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
~
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
, ~ -
No Lanes ; 1 1< 1 2 1; 2 2
Volumes ; 264 1 1389; ; 1555 640; 191 1768
Lane Width ;12 0 12 0 12 0; ; 12 0 12 0;12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 463; ; 213; 0
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ;NB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left ; SB Left *
Thru ; Thru *
Right ; Right
Peds * ; PPds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 25A ;Green 42A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 75 ;^cs Phase combination order #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Ad3 Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 1492 517 0 54 0 35 15 8 C 28 0 D
TR 1492 517 0 95 0 35 31 8 D
R 1492 517 0 94 0 35 31 2 D
NB T 3510 2012 0 85 0 57 10 1 B 9 0 B
R 1492 855 0 53 0 57 4 9 A
SB L 328 188 1 12 0 57 113 5 F 26 6 D
T 3510 2012 0 97 0 57 17 2 C
Intersection Delay = 20 1(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
TayIor F.hgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PROPOM) RFlCVE 15 June, 1994
2000 DIRECTIONAL DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES with_REZOXE,--- continued
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
` Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets• (E-W) Miszl-cn (N-S) Sullivan
Analyst• TEI File Name S&MSSNRZ HC9
Area Type Other 6-2-94 P M Pk
Comment 2000 Directional Design Hour Volumes (DDHV's) with Rezone
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R ; L T R ; L T R ; L T R
No Lanes ; > 1 < ; > 1 < ; 1 2 < ; 1 ? 1
Volumes ; 176 26 113; 45 7 55; 95 1965 46; 61 2807 290
Lane Width ; 12 0 ; 12 0 1112 0 12 0 ;12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols ; 38; 18; 15; 97
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8
EB Left * ; NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
WB Left * ; SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds *
NB Right ;EB Right
SB Right ;WB Right
Green 9A ;Green 43A
Yellow/A-R 4 ;Yellow/A-R 4
Lost Time 3 0 ;Lost Time 3 0
Cycle Length 60 secs Phase combination order #1 #5
-
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group• Ad3 Sat v/c g/c Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 1539 256 1 13 0 17 98 5 F 98 5 F
WB LTR 1444 241 0 39 0 17 14 8 B 14 8 B
NB L 163 120 0 84 0 73 29 5 D 6 0 B
TR 3553 2606 0 85 0 73 4 9 A
SB L 163 120 0 54 0 73 6 2 B 78 0 F
T 3564 2614 1 19 0 73 84 5 F
R 1515 1111 0 18 0 73 1 2 A
Intersection Delay = 50 6(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "CA"
S. I. P. 's PI~OPiQ.SF.~ RF.LONE 16 June, 1994
VJ
W
E
~
~
'H
.
~H
HN
.W
.
Hz
zo
WH
~H
Ua
~w
Hx
Hw
a
H
a .
H
r
Tayl or Erigirzge erirzg , Irzc _
S_ I_ P. ' s PROPOSED REZONE
~ 1994 T r~0U= Stud y
t TRZIm 63EC3f SRWTZOW 3EC93TIM!>T3M8
INTRODIICTION
The purpose of this report is to document the estimation of
traffic generated by the proposed project. The trip generation
estimates are based on trip rates contained in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERATION / 5th Edition
Trip generation estimates were made for the following alter-
native sets of conditions•
(1) Existing conditions (i e, the amount of traffic
the existing development at the industrial park
generates) "Existing";
(2) The amount of t raf f i c generated by the port i on of
the industrial park proposed to be rezoned if it
is developed as currently soned (i.e , I-3) "No
Rezone Buildout";
(3) The amount of traffic generated by the portion of
the industrial park proposed to be rezoned if the
resone is approved "Rezone Buildout";
(4) The amount of traffic generated by Phase I of
Sullivan Park Center (at 650,000 sq ft ) located
between the Spokane River and I-90 and between
Pines and Flora Roads (Phase II, "buildout",
requires the construction of the Evergreen
Interchange), and,
(5) The amount of t raf f i c generated by Spokane Val l ey
Plaza (346,352 sq ft ) located in the northeast
quadrant of the intersection of Sullivan and
Broadway
It should be noted that, whereas it is estimated that over 90
percent of the traffic generated by industrial land uses are
"new" trips (i e., they would not be generated without the land
use), according to ITE's TRANSPORTATION and LAND DEVELOPMENT,
between 20 and 40 percent of the traffic from to Sullivan Park
Center and Spokane Valley Plaza are "pass-by" or diverted trips
(i e, the trips would be made regardless of the development).
In addition, based on the results of trip distribution, it
is estimated that nearly half the trips generated by the proposed
commercial rezone (i e., from I-3 to B-1) are internal to the
industrial park (e g., someone who works in the industrial park
going to a restaurant in the commercial area). As a result, the
TayIor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "M"
S. I.P. 's PROFOSED RFl.QWE 1 June, 1994
rezone does not represent a major increase (over either "Existinq
Conditions" or "No Rezone Buildout Conditions") in off-site
traffic.
The remainder of this attachment is the actual output:
ESTIMATED TRIP GEMERATION for EXISTING CONDITIONS
INDUSTRIAL PARK
51000 EMPLOYEES AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 130 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 3 34 2 38 1.00 16,700
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 40 .00 1.00 2,009
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 09 00 1.00 441
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 49 73 1 00 2,450
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 10 00 1 00 483
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .36 00 1.00 1,817
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 46 73 1.00 2,300
AM GEN PK HR ENTER .37 .00 1 00 1,871
AM GEN PK HR EXIT .06 .00 1.00 280
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL .43 68 1 00 2,150
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 10 00 1.00 483
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 36 00 1 00 1,817
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 46 .70 1.00 2,300
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 1 14 1 45 1 00 5,700
PK HR ENTER 04 .00 1.00 224
PK HR EXIT .10 00 1.00 476
PR HR TOTAL .14 37 1.00 700
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 34 .64 1 00 1,700
PK HR ENTER 01 .00 1.00 69
PK HR EXIT .02 .00 1.00 81
PK HR TOTAL .03 .17 1.00 150
Source. Institute of Tra s ortation En inee s
TRIP GENERATION ~ ~th Edition ?1991~
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION of the ^NO RBZONE BIIILDOIIT"
INDUSTRIAL PARK
9 33 ACRES AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 130 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 62.90 62.21 1.00 587
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 8.27 .00 1.00 77
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 1.82 00 1.00 17
7-9 AM PK HR T4TAL 10.09 6 57 1 00 94
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 2 20 .00 1 00 21
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 8 28 00 1 00 77
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 10 48 7.38 1.00 98
AM GEN PK HR ENTER 7.21 00 1 00 67
AM GEN PK HR EXIT 1 08 00 1.00 10
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 8 29 6 12 1.00 77
Taylor Engineerzng, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachrnent '"IG"
S. I. P. 's P~OP0~5~ REZCNE 2 Jtme, 1994
ESTIMATED TR I P GE'NB`RAT I ON o f th e"NO REZ OKg BII I LDOIIT"
continued
INDUSTRIAL PARK
9 33 ACRES AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 130 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 1 82 .00 1.00 17
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 6.85 .00 1.00 64
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 8 67 7 16 1.00 81
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 34 23 41.91 1.00 319
PK HR ENTER 1.51 00 1.00 14
PK HR EXIT 3 20 .00 1 00 30
PK HR TOTAL 4.71 2 23 1.00 44
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 10 11 9 02 1 00 94
PK HR ENTER .46 .00 1.00 4
PK HR EXIT 53 00 1.00 5
PK HR TOTAL 99 1 22 1.00 9
INDUSTRIAL PARK
12.2 ACRES AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 130 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 62 90 62.21 1.00 771
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 8 27 00 1 00 101
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 1.82 00 1 00 22
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 10 09 6..57 1 00 124
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 2.20 .00 1 00 27
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 8.28 00 1.00 101
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 10.48 7 38 1.00 128
AM GEN PK HR ENTER 7 21 00 1.00 88
AM GEN PK HR EXIT 1.08 .00 1.00 13
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 8.29 6.12 1 00 102
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 1 82 00 1 00 22
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 6 85 00 1.00 84
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 8.67 7 16 1.00 106
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 34.23 41 91 1 00 419
PK HR ENTER 1.51 .00 1 00 18
PK HR EXIT 3 20 00 1.00 39
PK HR TOTAL 4 71 2 23 1.00 58
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 10 11 9 02 1 00 124
-PK HR ENTER .46 00 1.00 6
PK HR EXIT .53 .00 1.00 7
PK HR TOTAL 99 1 22 1.00 12
CURRENT ZONING DR-WAY
BUILDOUT VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 11358
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 178
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 39
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 218
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 48
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 178
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 226
Tayl or Enngineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment
S. I. P. 's PlaOPiOuw REI,GIITE 3 JLme, 1994
ESTIlsATED TRIP GLNERATION of the "NO REZONL BDILDOIIT"
continued
CURRENT ZONING DR-WAY
BUILDOUT VOLUME
AM GEN PK HR ENTER 155
AM GEN PK HR EXIT 23
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 179
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 39
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 148
PM GEN PK HR T4TAL 187
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 738
PK HR ENTER 32
PK HR EXIT 69
PK HR TOTAL 102
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 218
PK HR ENTER 10
PK HR EXIT 12
PK HR TOTAL 21
Source• Institute of Transgth ortation En ineers
TRIP GENERATION / Edition ~1991)
CURRENT ZONING DR-WAY
TOTALS VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 18,058
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2,187
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 480
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2,668
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 531
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 1,995
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 2,526
AM GEN PK HR ENTER 2,026
AM GEN PK HR EXIT 303
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL 2,329
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 522
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 1,965
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 21487
_SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 6,438
PK HR ENTER 256
PK HR EXIT 545
PK HR TOTAL 802
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 11918
PK HR ENTER 79
PK HR EXIT 93
PK HR TOTAL 171
Source: Institute of Trans ortation En ineers
TRIP GENERATION / ~th Edition ~1991)
,
~
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachunent "'AG"
S. Z. P. os PIaOPIOM) REZM 4 June, 1994
ESTIKATED TRIP GENERATION of the "REZONE BIIILDOIIT"
INDUSTRIAL PARK
9 33 ACRES AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 130 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 1.82 .00 1.00 17
PM GEN PK HR EXIT 6 85 .00 1.00 64
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL 8 67 7.16 1 00 81
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 34.23 41 91 1.04 319
PK HR ENTER 1 51 00 1.00 14
PK HR EXIT 3 20 .00 1.00 30
PK HR TOTAL 4 71 2 23 1.00 44
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL• 10.11 9.02 1.00 94
PK HR ENTER 46 00 1.00 4
PK HR EXIT 53 .00 1.00 5
PK HR TOTAL .99 1 22 1 00 9
SHOPPING CENTER AVERAGE
130,000 G F A. RATE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 820 (per 1400) DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 64.05 62 21 1.00 8,327
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 92 00 1 00 119
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 54 00 1.00 70
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 1 46 6 57 1.00 190
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 2 98 00 1.00 388
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2.98 04 1 00 388
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 5.97 7 38 1 00 776
AM GEN PK HR ENTER 00 00 1 00 N/A
AM GEN PK HR EXIT 00 00 1.00 NA
AM GEN PK HR TOTAL .00 6 12 1 00 N/A
PM GEN PK HR ENTER 00 .00 1.00 N/A
PM GEN PK HR EXIT .00 00 1.00 N~A
PM GEN PK HR TOTAL .00 7 16 1 00 N A
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 82 95 41 91 1 00 10,784
,
PK HR ENTER 4.04 .00 1.00 526
PK HR EXIT 4.04 .00 1 00 526
PK HR TOTAL 8 09 2 23 1.00 1,051
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 43.31 9.02 1.00 51631
PK HR ENTER 2.30 00 1.00 299
-PK HR EXIT 2 39 .00 1 00 311
PK HR TOTAL 4 70 1 22 1.00 610
TOTAL
REZONE DR-WAY
BUILDOUT VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 8,914
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 196
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 87
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 284
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 409
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 465
4-6 PM PK HR T4TAL 874
,
~
Taylor Engineering, Inc. 1994 Traftic Study / Attachrnent "IM"
S. I. P. 's REZCM 5 June, 1994
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATIOAt of the "REZONE BUILDOIIT"
continued
TOTAL
REZONE DR-WAY
BUILDOUT VOLUME
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 11,103
PK HR ENTER 540
PK HR EXIT 556
PK HR TOTAL 1,095
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 5,725
PK HR ENTER 303
PK HR EXIT 316
PK HR TOTAL 619
REZONE TOTAL TOTAL TRIP
BUILDOUT DR-WAY INTERNAL on
TOTALS VOLUME TRIPS ROADWAYS
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 25,614 3,747 18,120
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 2,205 12 2,181
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 528 7 514
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 2,734 19 2,696
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 892 159 574
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2,282 159 1,964
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 3,174 318 2,538
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 16,803 1,294 14,215
PK HR ENTER 764 79 606
PK HR EXIT 1,032 79 874
PK HR TOTAL 1,795 158 1,479
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 7,425 282 6,861
PK HR ENTER 372 21 330
PK HR EXIT 397 22 353
PR HR TOTAL 769 43 683
Taylor Engineering, ?nc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachnnent "M"
S. I. P. 's PlaOPOW) RTsZCM 6 June, 1994
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION of OTHER PROJECTS
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER AVG
650,000 G.F.A. RATE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 820 (per 1000) DEVIATION FACTOR VOLIIME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 35.65 00 1.00 23,169
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 47 00 1.00 308
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 28 .00 1.00 181
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .75 .00 1 00 489
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 1 67 00 1.00 1,085
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 1.67 .00 1.00 1,085
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 3 34 00 1.00 2,171
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 45 58 .00 1.00 29,630
PK HR ENTER 2 25 00 1 00 1,461
PK HR EXIT 2 25 .00 1 00 1,461
PK HR TOTAL 4 49 00 1 00 2,922
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 19.31 .00 1 00 12,551
PK HR ENTER 93 .00 1 00 604
PK HR EXIT 97 00 1 00 629
PK HR TOTAL 1 90 00 1.00 1,233
SPOKANE VALLEY PLAZA AVG
346,452 G F A. RATE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY
ITE Code 820 (per 1000) DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME
AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 44 35 00 1 00 15,365
7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 61 .00 1 00 213
7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 36 00 1 00 125
7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 97 00 1.00 338
4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 2 09 .00 1 00 724
4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 2 09 00 1 00 724
4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 4 18 00 1 00 1,448
SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 57 61 00 1 00 19,958
PK HR ENTER 2 83 00 1 00 980
PK HR EXIT 2.83 00 1 00 980
PK HR TOTAL 5.66 00 1.00 1,959
SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 26.48 .00 1.00 9,174
PK HR ENTER 1.32 00 1.00 459
PK HR EXIT 1 38 00 1 00 478
-PK HR TOTAL 2.70 .00 1 00 937
Taylor EYigineering, Inc 1994 Tratfic Study / Attachment 'IM"
S. I. P. 's PRO~ RE70M 7 Jtme, 1994
YI
~ z
~
NO
aH
aH
.
'U
W
Hh
x0
wa
~a
x
UH
~H
H
H~
~a
a
Tayl or ErigirZec--- rirzg , Iric _
P _ PROPOSED REZONE
W=TVWO1Z1C-13A0XC3D MODX:CLIlfG
May 14, 1994
As Revised, June 10, 1994
INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW
A modified version of QRS II was used in this study to
develop projections of traffic volumes without and with the
proposed rezoned QRS II is a microcomputer application of
traditional "network-based" computerized travel forecasting
procedures designed to implement methods contained in NATIONAL
COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 187 (NCHRP 187),
Transportation Research Board (TRB) 1978 Traditional travel
forecasting is comprised of the following four steps
(1) Trip Generation
Trip generation is the estimatzoii of the number of l
trips that begin or end at given locations (i e, trip
ends) For this study, trip ends were characterized as
"internal", those that begin or end within the primary
study area, and "external", those that begin or end
outside the study area The P M peak hour is expected
to experience the highest amount of traffic generated
in any one hour by the proposed project and was
selected as the "design hour"
Trip generation rates in ITE's TRIP GENERATION /
Sth Edition were used to estimate traffic generated by
the proposed development as well as by existing
development in the site's vicinity Attachment "TG"
provides more detailed descriptions and summaries
(2) Trip Distribution
Trip distribution is the estimation of how many
trip ends begin at one location and end at another
location (i e, trips) For this study, the "power
function" of QRS II's gravity model was used with
exponents for typical urban areas the size of Spokane
contained in NCHRP 187 to estimate trip distribution.
(3) Mode Choice
Mode choice is the estimation of how many trips
are made by different "modes" of travel Since ITE's
TRIP GENERA3'ION / 5th Edition estimates vehicle trips
directly (as opposed to person trips), explicit mode
choice estimates were unnecessary
(4) Trip Assignment
Trip asszgnment is the estimation of how many
trips use each segment of the roadway system as
represented by the model's "network" (a network is a
Taylor kngineering, Znc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. 2.P. riairuuw REZGiNE ~ 1 June, 1994
characteristics). QRS II uses an "all-or-nothing"
assignment process based on "minimum time paths" (i e,
the path or route between two locations taking the
least amount of time)
To adequately address the traffic impacts of the project and
to maximize use of available demographic data, modeling was com-
pleted at two levels
(1) "Macroscale" Analyses using a generalized,
regional network based on Spokane Regional Trans-
portation Council's (SRTC's) "traffic analysis
zone-level data base", and,
(2) "Microscale" Analyses using detailed "networks"
for the "study area"
SRTC's "zone 1 evel data base" contains the fol 1 owing four
demographic characteristics for each zone•
(1) Single family dwelling units (SFU's);
(2) Multi-family dwelling units (MFU's);
(3) Retail employment (RET); and,
(4) Non-retail employment (NRET)
The "macroscale analyses" were used to determine the overall
changes from existing conditions of the proprosed rezone on
design hour traffic volumes for "external stations" to the "study
area" Based on the resulting projections and the results of the
peak period turning movement surveys, estimates were produced for
2000 without and with the proposed rezone for the "microscale
analyses"
- NETWORK DEVELOPMENT
Experience indicates the most important network attributes
are travel times To assure the network was "sensitive" to
travel times, the travel times were coded in tenths of minutes
Initial estimates of travel times were based on speed limits
The following graphic portrays the "macroscale" network used for
the study
The "study area" was defined as being from Trent to Mission
along Sullivan Road The estimates of 2000 deszgn hour volumes
were based on historical growth rates provided by Spokane County
supplemented with the results of the County's "Sullivan Road
Corridor Study" and other studies completed for projects in the
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. PROP~OtSID REZ(IVE 2 Ji,me, 1994
"MACROSCALE" NETWORK
~
c
~
S' d N
0)
) d -Y
L
O i'
) d
w Wellesley ~ LA-
c
~
X S I T E
Euclid
~
I-90
~
<>-~Mlssion,
~
~
Sprague
16th
32nd
Taylor Ehgzneering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachwmt "QRS"
S. I. P. RII,CWE 3 JLme, 1994
site's vicinity Those estimates were also supplemented with
"peak period turning movment surveys" taken in the project's
vicinity The changes were overlayed the peak hour results of
the turning movement surveys to determine 2000 design hour
volumes without and with the proposed rezone. The remainder of
this attachment is the output of the assignment process•
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Trent 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
Total Approaching 6
Left Turns
RightgTurns 6
Total Exiting 20
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 14 Total Approaching 11
Left Turns Left Turns l
1
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 14 Right Turns
Total Exiting 46 Total Exiting 36
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 102
Left Turns 46
RhghtgTurns 36
Total Exiting 31
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 133
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 133
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Kiernan 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
Total Approaching 31
Left Turns 31
Throughs
Right Turns
Total Exiting 102
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 169
Lef t Turns Lef t Turns 5
6
Throughs 1 Throughs 2
Right Turns Right Turns 102
Total Exiting SOUTH 2 LEG Total Exiting 46
Total Approaching 14
Left Turns
Throughs
Right Turns 14
g .
Total Exitin 65
- TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 215
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 215
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Euclid 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
TLeft TuPnsaching 3 66
RhghtgTurns 56
Total Exiting 14
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 1
Left Turns 1 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 1
Total Exiting 6 Total Exiting 3
Taylor IIzgineering, Inc. 1994 Traff2c Study / Attachme.nt "QRS"
S. I• P. Ra.CNE 4 June, 1994
~
fc1 ..~u
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Euclid 2000 w/ No Rezone
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 12
Left Turns
Trou
hghtgTurns 12
~ R
Total Exiting 57
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 80
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 80
INTERSECTION' Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
Total Approaching 57
ThrouThsns 35
RightgTurns 22
Total Exiting 12
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 5
Left Turns 0 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 5
Total Exiting 22 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 7
ThrouThsns 7
RightgTurns
Total Exiting 35
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 69
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 69
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
TLeft TuPnsaching 4 35
Throughs 31
Rlght Turns 0
Total Exiting 7
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns 1 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 0
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 4
Total Approaching 6
ThroTurns
6
uh
_ RightgTurns
Total Exiting 31
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 42
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 42
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Mission 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Buildout Trips Only
Total Approaching 31
Left Turns 1
Throughs 27
TotaltExiting 3 6
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns 1 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 0
Total Exiting 3 Total Exiting 1
Taylor EYigineering, Inc 1994 Traftic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. Pi~OP~0~5'ID RFZONE 5 Ji.uie, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 5
Left Turns
Trou
RhghtgTurns 5
Total Exiting 27
TOTAL APPROACH WOLUMES = 37
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 37
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Trent 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other Pro3ects Only
Total Approaching 44
ThrouThsns 44
RightgTurns
Total Exiting 44
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 98 Total Approaching 76
Lef t Turns Lef t Turns 6
7
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 98 Right Turns
Total Exiting 98 Total Exiting 76
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 218
ThrouThsns 498
4
RightgTurns 76
Total Exiting 218
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 436
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 436
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Kiernan 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other Pro3ects Only
Total Approaching 218
Left Turns
Throughs 218
Right Turns
Total Exiting 218
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 30 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns Left Turns 0
Throughs Throughs
Rzght Turns 30 Right`Turns
Total Exiting 30 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 248
ThrouThsns 230
- RightgTurns 0
Total Exiting 248
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 496
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 496
INTERSECTION* Sullivan & Euclid 2000 w~ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other rojects Only
Total Approaching 249
Left Turns
Throughs 249
Right Turns
Total Exiting 249
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 69 Total Approaching 1
Left Turns Left Turns 1
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 69 Right Turns
Total Exiting 69 Total Exiting 1
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. Pl~OPO~S~ RFZCtTE 6 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 319
Left Turns 69
RirhtgTurns 241
Total Exiting 319
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 638
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 638
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other Projects Only
Total Approaching 319
Left Turns
Throughs 319
Right Turns
Total Exiting 319
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 133
Left Turns Left Turns 133
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 0 Right Turns
Total Exiting 133 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching33 452
Left Turns 1
RightgTurns 310
Total Exiting 452
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 904
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 904
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other Projects 4nly
Total Approachzng 452
Left Turns
Throughs 452
Right Turns
Total Exiting 452
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 188 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns Left Turns 0
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 188 Right Turns
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 188
Total Approaching 640
Left Turns 0
Throughs 452
Right Turns 188
- Total Exiting 640
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 1,280
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 1,280
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Mission 2000 wL No Rezone
NORTH LEG Other Projects Only
Total Approaching 640
Left Turns
Throughs 640
Right Turns
Total Exiting 640
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 31 Total Approaching 15
Left Turns Left Turns 5
1
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 31 Right Turns
Total Exiting 31 Total Exiting 15
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. PRoPOSU ~ REZM 7 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 686
Left Turns 31
RhghtgTurns 615
Total Exiting 686
TOTAL APPROACA VOLUMES = 1,372
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 1,372
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Trent 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG P M. Peak Hour
Total Approaching95
423
Throughsns 200
Right Turns 28
Total Exiting 653
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 767 Total Approaching 882
Left Turns 122 Left Turns 350
Throughs 195 Throughs 279
Right Turns 450 Right Turns 253
Total Exiting 933 Total Exiting 877
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching26
1,391
Through~ns 278
Right Turns 487
Total Exiting 1,000
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,463
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,463
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Kiernan 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
Total Approachin950
999
ThroughsnS 824
Right Turns 25
Total Exiting 1,392
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 103 Total Approaching 624
Left Turns 14 Left Turns 241
Throughs 2 Throughs 7
Right Turns 87 Right Turns 376
Total Exiting 119 Total Exzting 220
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 1,157
Left Turns 87
Throughs 1,002
- Right Turns 68
Total Exiting 1,152
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 2,883
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 2,883
INTERSECTION* Sullzvan & Euclid 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG P M. Peak Hour
` Total Approaching 11153
Left Turns 48
Throughs 1,087
Right Turns 18
Total Exiting 1,158
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 412 Total Approaching 619
Left Turns 75 Left Turns 464
Throughs 27 Throughs 15
Right Turns 310 Right Turns 140
Total Exiting 144 Total Exiting 227
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffi c Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. PWOPOSID RE7ANE 8 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
Total Approachingll 1,206
Throughsns 943
Right Turns 152
Total Exiting 1,861
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,390
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,390
INTERSECTION, Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
TLeft TuPnsaching O 2,255
Throughs 11522
Right Turns 733
Total Exiting 1 384
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 555
Left Turns 0 Left Turns 450
Throughs 0 Throughs 2
Right Turns 0 Right Turns 103
Total Exiting 1,265 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching30 1,811
Left Turns 5
RirhtgTurns 1,280
Total Exiting 1,972
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 4,621
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 4,621
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching92 1,972
Left Turns 1
Throughs 1,780
Right Turns 0
Total Exiting 1 811
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 1,652 Total Approachin 0
Left Turns 263 Left Turns g0
Throughs 0 Throughs 0
Right Turns 1,389 Right Turns 0
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 832
TLeft Tupnsaching O 2,188
Throughs 1,548
Right Turns 640
- Total Exiting 3,169
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 5,812
TOTAL EXITING VOLUIyiES = 51812
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Mission 2000 w/ No Rezone
NORTH LFG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching 3,169
Lef t Turns 61
Throughs 2,817
Right Turns 291
Total Exiting 2 189
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 315 Total Approaching 106
Left Turns 176 Left Turns 5
4
Throughs 26 Throughs 7
Right Turns 113 Right Turns 54
Total Exiting 393 Total Exiting 133
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. 1994 Tratfic Study / Attachanent "QRS"
S. I. P. Pl~OP0.SID RFZCNE 9 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 2,100
Left Turns 95
Throughs 1,959
Right Turns 46
Total Exiting 2,975
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 5,690
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 5,690
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Trent 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
Total Approaching 12
Left Turns
Throughs 12
R3ght Turns
Total Exitzng 12
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 28 Total Approaching2 22
Left Turns Left Turns 2
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns 28 Rlght Turns
Total Exiting 28 Total Exiting 22
SOUTH LEG -
Total Approaching 62
ThrouThsns 12
RightgTurns 22
Total Exiting 62
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 124
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 124
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & Kiernan 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
Total Approaching 62
Left Turns 62
Throughs
Right Turns
Total Exiting 62
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 103
Left Turns Left Turns o
4
Throughs 1 Throughs 1
Right Turns Right Turns 62
Total Exiting SOUTH 1 LEG Total Exiting 91
Total Approaching 28
Lef t Turns
Throughs
- Right Turns 28
Total Exiting 40
TOTAL APPROAC~i VOLUMES = 194
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 194
INTERSECTION Sullivan &Eaclid 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
Total Approaching 41
ThrouThsns 35
RightgTurns 4
Total Exiting 28
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 3 Total Approaching 1
Lef t Turns 3 Lef t Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 1
Total Exiting 4 Total Exiting 2
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S• I• P• RFZGtTE 10 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
t Total Approaching 24
Left Turns
RhghtgTurns 24
Total Exiting 35
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 69
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 69
INTERSECTION• Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
TLeft TuPnsaching O 35
RightgTurns 13
Total Exiting 24
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 9
Left Turns 0 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 9
Total Exiting 13 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 15
Left Turns
Throughs 15
Right Turns
Total Exiting 22
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 59
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 59
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
TLeft TPPnsaching 3 22
RightgTurns 10
Total Exiting 15
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 2 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns 2 Left Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 0
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 3
Total Approaching 13
Left Turns
RightgTurns 13
- Total Exiting 19
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 37
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 37
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Mission 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG Rezone Only Trips
Total Approaching 20
Left Turns 1
Right gTurns 12
Total Fxiting 13
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 1 Total Approaching 1
Lef t Turns 1 Lef t Turns
Throughs Throughs
Right Turns Right Turns 1
Total Exiting 2 Total Exiting 1
Taylor EYiqineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
3• 7• P. PROPD.SID REZCNE 11 June, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
' Total Approaching 11
Left Turns
RhghtgTurns 11
Total Exiting 17
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 33
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 33
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Trent 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching95
429
Throuahsns 206
Right Ttirns 28
Total Exiting 645
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 781 Total Approaching 893
Left Turns 122 Left Turns 361
Throughs 195 Throughs 279
Right Turns 464 Right Turns 253
Total Exiting 915 Total Exiting 863
SOUTH LEG
Total Approachinq08 1,351
TehrouThsns 270
RightgTurns 473
Total Exiting 1,031
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,454
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,454
INTERSECTION• Sullivan 5 Kiernan 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
1,030
( Total ApproachznY81
Left Turns Thr
oughs 824
Right Turns 25
Total Exiting 1,352
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 103 Total Approaching 558
Left Turns 14 Left Turns 216
Throughs 2 Throughs 6
Right Turns 87 Right Turns 336
Total Exiting 118 Total Exiting 265
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 1,171
Left Turns 87
Throughs 1,002
- Right Turns 82
Total Exzting 1,127
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES _ 2,862
OTAL EXITING VOLUNIES 2,862
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Euclid 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching 1,128
Left Turns 47
Throughs 1,065 ~
Right Turns 16
Total Exiting 1,172
WEST LEG EAST LEG
Total Approaching 414 Total Approaching 619
Left Turns 77 Left Turns 464
Throughs 27 Throughs 15
Right Turns 310 Right Turns 140
Total Exiting 142 Total Exiting 226
~
Taylor Engineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. PROPOM) RF.LCIITE 12 Jime, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
SOUTH LEG
~ Total Approachingll
1,218
TeftuTuhsrns g955
Right Turns 152
Total Exiting 1,839
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 3,379
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 3,379
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Wb Ramps 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
TLeft TuPnsaching O 2,233
Throughs 1,509
Right Turns 724
Total Exiting 1 396
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 0 Total Approaching 559
Left Turns 0 Left Turns 450
Throughs 0 Throughs 2
Right Turns 0 Right Turns 107
Total Exiting 1,256 Total Exiting 0
SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching30 1,819
Left Turns 5
rg 1,28
Ri
Totaht l Turns 0
Exiting 1,959
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 4,611
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 4,611
INTERSECTION Sullivan & I-90 Eb Ramps 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH LEG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching91 1,959
~ Left Turns 1
Throughs 1,768
Right Turns 0
Total Exiting 1 819
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 1,653 Total Approaching 0
Left Turns 264 Left Turns 0
Throughs 0 Throughs 0
Right Turns 1,389 Right Turns 0
Total Exiting SOUTH 0 LEG Total Exiting 831
TLeft Turnsaching 0 2,195
Throughs 1,555
Right Turns 640
_ Total Exiting 3,157
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 5,807
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 5,807
INTERSECTION Sullivan & Mission 2000 w/ Rezone
NORTH I,EG P M Peak Hour
Total Approaching 3,158
Lef t Turns 61
Throughs 2,807
Right Turns 290
Total Exiting 2 196
WEST LEG EASt LEG
Total Approaching 315 Total ApproachinW 5 107
Left Turns 176 Left Turns
Throughs 26 Throughs 7
Right Turns 113 Right Turns 55
Total Exiting 392 Total Exiting 133
~
Taylor Ehgineering, Inc 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S. I. P. PROP~RSF~ RF.l.(WE 13 Ji.me, 1994
COMPARISONS of 2000 DDHV's without and with the PROJECT
continued
~ SOUTH LEG
Total Approaching 21106
Left Turns 95
Throughs 1,965
Right Turns 46
Total Exiting 2,965
TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 5,686
TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 5,686
I
~
4
Taylor E.hgineering, Inc. 1994 Traffic Study / Attachment "QRS"
S.I.P. P~a0P0.SU, I RELCM 14 June, 1994
'~m:, s „p~`rr ,.m ,1#„ter',. e' w.~s°.
a
re~s,.~.~,.:: . ;..,~a »~rea~um,~...~..wap ,aw„.~.. , ;cis,..: xa ,~~r~,a,.,e
i
~
vr.'n-x.151 WT.b^., .sm..4".~~."f5M'.'rY~.Tr.:^:`.S"~"l~^~""~~•~?..Ni;d6M~w~w^.~'H'::...T~«d~d.
I
^ g n ~..M
fy }~j ..9' a e a
f
_ ~'"~*:-,s:dwa.~e ~d.::~mea~t~a~•:h:,mr°•+'':s~.. ~ -~aar~~rtia.~~~d•x.:~a:~°~.~.:ti~:^~.~:«.y' a s. - _
_ _
1
i 4
y i i
A
r t9' I
'.y _ a i s S. 1', d.
.J
~t i
1m
i
My w r ..:M. i ,q{g~„ ~ I
g i a: r.,
r R 3 .,fie
i °
~ . w i
o .snuff.. i
' ' t ? r.. r w
. I _ 1 ~
r ~ 'r: F
r
r
trh~s •
} ~ ,
l I _ !
3
t
era M~;.
9
I l-.
i
1
i r. i
-0~:
4 )
} x x... ~C d,
E
'~!.Y:a y_,,
~ 1
~ -...q_...<._
i
^'.+¢y.
v ~ ' 4- E
~+yx~~•... ~ p~.1 , ,g.~ ...s .a~e7 ~ t~; -N.y ,y ~„ww ~ .Fq « . b.,
1 }
i
.Po
f
i
~ 4
8
y II ~ ~
P
4
I
i
I
a~m _ t .
f _
}
J
I
x._
i
4
E
i
s
i
a
4 dF 19
1
# i
7
a~ i
.e ~ 3
~ 4
~ 1