ZE-61-85
.
w
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. YE-70-85
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
P ri or To The Issuance Of A Bui 1 di ng Permit:
l. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall improve Rockwell Avenue in a manner consistent
with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 2 minimum paving
width Access Standard.
3. Other specific improvements: Improvements to Rockwell Avenue
shall be constructed f rom the westerly boundary of the proposed
zone change eastward to Best Road.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a bui 1 ding pemit on the property.
5. 7he applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the p roperty.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engi neer pri or to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
requi red for any porti on of the project whi ch i s to be occupi ed
or traveled by vehicles.
7. 7he word "appl i cant" shal l i ncl ude the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7
V
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0, YE-70-85
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requi rements are found i n Spokane Board of County Comni ssi oners'
Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended.
11. A problem with roadway and right of way alignment exists on the
west end of the proposed zone change. The applicant shall
coordinate with the County Engineer and work toward the
resolutton of the problem. This problem must be rectified to
the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior to release of
building permits for the proposal.
8
AVJ ;JT6
,
U D~6~~ _ ~ 6~y ~
P~o~~~ -
~ ~
~ W~. s C~,~~ - r '7 ~ '~DM10e- - k~A~ o
~0- Ir~vlc~~~~~ h"ZI uc_
"t-~,j 'Do ec, ~U 0'#"
~ ~ ~~~4 ~Y~ ~ ~ - ~ ✓ y ~ y ~ ✓
u '
os s~, o rv
~
a ~
CZ ~,^~~I►~~ l~ ~
~
1169 C 21 cr~i --e D fo e c'-F-~ - 1-~i
~s r eq
4) j N+r3 CUQ t`I t4 0 7
'S~ ~
I' li'
~ o
P
~
C.~O S ~ ~ Np v~Pl. '
C~ Wt
.
~
3. ~ ~QS s 1~ ~ ? C " ~ Q G ~ s~ ~E'NSi ~ ~ ~'e~ r e S~"*~~►^~
1
FP-"~- 1--\ ozti
~
A 1 ` `'c nti A
~
ll/j//o~l/l/~
iioowooooolllllll 000000000 o
wommooo
0000 o
, .
J J
V
0
brAe
~no N
~ ~
q . Q
~ 4c °
_
1 O'D N ab ls~a ; ` n~ °4
J ~ ti 1 q4 ~
. ~ • N d
b
4d0 01117
"dol
o G y~(~~ ~ ~ ~
x~'~ 8tr 3a9~~~3 i K
t ar N I ! 0
4y pd0a M
.
~ ~~YIbQ~ ~ 0
. ~ ,
~
r►3 j''° w ~ 7- ~ 1
CL ~
O1 w
J • ~ ~tiW~ ~ ,,,d~A ~ z ° N ~ I
r "
oc. ~
W i ' ~ O a W
3 •
Z
d I ~ a Q ~
'1~~ °Y ~ ~ Sd IS ~ N
i y a~ pf ' i~`''~
0 N a W ~
w AD
~
~ 1;0 W ~ ~
oao N
-
, • ~ ~
~'~lroow fl.ve! /00'
~ `fi4.►.r..~.~ r...`sr, - j ~ ` ~1 tV
1~ o `1
^
~kf~
• v ~ PI ^ ~ ~ n 1.
, .
~
~ q ~
` y~ ' , A E flpl
X5
~ Q
~ , y 7
~
1 =
~OC~'l~YEL L ~YE / E
,
. I
l f-
V
1
~ \ ° ~ ; -
~-J
~
~
. I o~ ~ S 8 N
8
~ ^ z r"
_ ~ .
a~
~ ~ ~,p vi.v6 • ~
ci'
~
~
~
y
~
y 2a v
c 1{~ ~ -r
~ I ~ ~ I
~ I 1"U I
.
PLANIVING DEPARTMENT
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
l •
SPOKANE COUNT/GOUpTM0U3C
P L A N N I N G REPORT
Date: JULY 3, 1985
T0. SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMt1ITTEE
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR
FROM. Spokane County Planning Department
SUBJ ECT : Rezone #ZE-61-85, Two-Fami ly Resi dential ( R-2 ) to Mul tipl e Fami ly
Suburban
Variance #VE-70-85; To allow a 27-foot Front Yard Setback, whereas
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.07.130-(c) requires a
30-foot Front Yard Setback.
I. GEWERAL INFORMATION
~Iplicant: CROSBY ENTERPRISES, INC. Agent: Wes Crosby
Owner: Crosby Enterprises, Inc.
Proposal•
A request to rezone an approximate 1.3 acre site from Two-Family
Residential (R-2) to Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of
developing four lots into six-plex structures with 24-units total.
A request for a Variance from Section 4.07.130-(c) of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance to allow a 27-foot Front Yard Setback,
whereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 30-foot Front
Yard Setback.
Location•
The site is generally located adjacent to Rockwell Avenue,
approximately 90 feet west of Best Road in Section 2-25-44.
.
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
II. SITE ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan:
MAJOR COMMERCIAL and URBAN Categories
- Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary
- Inside Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary
- Inside Urban Impact Area (UTA) Boundary
The project is within two Comprehensive Plan categories. The line between
the Major Comerci al and Urban categori es i s general ly al ong the al ignment
of Rockwell Avenue. The Comprehensive Plan Text indicates multiple family
developments may be compatible in the Major Commercial category through
the use of proper screening and performance standards; but the predominate
development will be shopping centers, comercial strips and freeway
commercial.
The Urban category recommends a residential density range from 1 to
17-units per ac re. The proposed density is 16.86 units per acre. Higher
densities are to be located with direct or near direct access to major
arterials, be on public transit routes, serve as a transitional use and
have urban services available.
Zoninq:
Existing on SITE: Two-Family Residential (R-2) (estab. 1975)
and within:
Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone
Ai rport Overl ay Zone
- Conical Area (CA)
To the NORTH: Agricultural (established 1942)
To the SOUTH: Agricultural (established 1942)
To the EAST: Two-Family Residential (R-2) (estab. 1975)
To the WEST: Agricultural (established 1942)
Commercial zoning extends approximately 150 feet north of Trent
Avenue but approximately 150 feet short di this site. There has been
no recent zoning activity since the establishment of the Two-Family
Residential (R-2) zoning on this property in 1975.
Land Use•
Existing on SITE: Undeveloped
To the NORTH: Single Family Residential
To the SOUTH: Undeveloped and Commercial on Trent
To the EAST: Single Family Residential
To the WEST: Single Family Residential, Animal
Keeping and Undeveloped
New construction has not occurred within this general area. The site
is separated f rom the commercial uses along Trent by vacant land and
Agricultural zoning.
~
l
✓
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued)
Site Characte ristics:
Site Size: Approximately 1.3 Acres Existing Buildings: None
Topography: Flat Vegetation: Natural Grass
Agricultural Summary: Major Cornnercial and Urban categories not
intended to protect agricultural land.
Adjoining Streets: Rockwell Avenue travels through the site and is a
50-foot County right of way improved with 2 lanes
gravel.
Best Road to the east of the site is a 40 to 50-
foot County right of way improved with 2 lanes
paved.
Proposed Site Plan.
Use: Six-Plex Apartment Building
Proposed Buildings: Four (4)
Site Coverage: 50 %
Maximum Structure Height. 2-1/2 Stories/28 Feet
Building Setbacks: PROPOSED REQUIRED
-
Front Yard 27' 30'
Note: The applicant is requesting a Variance to the required Front
Yard Setback.
Proposed Buffering Techniques: Site plan indicates a 6-foot wooden
fence around all four lots in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
Berming and landscaping are proposed within the side and front
yards. The garages are proposed at the rear lot lines.
Other Site Plan Considerations: The submitted Environmental
Checklist indicates a 50% structure coverage, the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone requires 65% of the site remain in open space.
note.
- The site plan submitted for review by the Zoning Hearing
Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to
determine compliance with all Ordinance regulations and
conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and
to occur at the Building Permit stage.
101,
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. ZE-70-85
III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Density: Proposed density of 16.86% is greater than the immediate areaa
Multiple Family Suburban zoning is found approximately 700 feet to the
east.
Design: The Health District advises that there appears to be insufficient
space available for on-site sewage disposal systems serving the structures
as depicted on the site plan.
Landscapin Q/-Bu~fferinq: Due to the proposed 2-1/2 story structures, a
aense mix o~ ow-iying and tall growing landscaping is recommended along
all property lines.
Circulation/Access: Access to the site is via Best to Rockwell Avenue.
Stormwater Drainage: Comply with '208' stormwater regulations.
Sewage Disposal: This area is designated as a"nitrate hot spot" by the
Environmental Protection Agency. A pressurized on-site sewage disposal
system is planned by the developer. County Utilities is requiring
double-plumbing specifications be approved prior to application for a
septic tank permit.
Water Supply: Trentwood Irrigation advises adequate mains for fire
hydrants shall be required.
Fire Protection: Proposed garages need one hour rated burning wall and ~
TO parapet. a
Critical Materials/Use Activity: Compliance with Aquifer Sensitive Area
Overl ay Zone.
IV. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was
reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered
the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County
ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions
of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County
policies and guidelines. The Zoning Administrator has determined
that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result f rom the
proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of
Non-Significance ("ONS").
~
s
r
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
IV. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REYIEW (continued)
The "DNS" was circulated to ten other agencies of jurisdiction and
other agencies/departments affected by the future development for
review and comnent. The "DNS" comment period ends J uly 2, 1985, and
was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by
letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal,
and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing
Examiner Comnittee may consider additional environmental related
testimony and the "DNS" at the public hearing.
V. PLANNING SUMMARY
That al though the project i s consistent wi th the Major Commerci al and
U rban categories of the Comprehensive Plan, it appears that the
density is greater than the nearby surrounding areas. The apartment
structures will serve as a suitable transitional use to future
commercial uses along T rent; but at the present, these are more than
150-feet to the south. Tall growing landscaping will help reduce the
impact to adjacent single family residences of the proposed 2-1/2
story apartment structures.
VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(Al1 Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. That a dense landscape strip of low lying and tall growing
vegetation be provided as a screen around the building for
privacy to adjacent uses.
2. That a 6-foot wooden fence be provided on all property lines but
not within the front yard setback area.
3. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired.
7
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
5. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Yariations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be maintained.
6. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
7. Al1 current standards of the Multiple Family Suburban Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this
site.
8. That the project i s subject to Secti on 4.16A.050, the Aqui fer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
9. Any divi si on of 1 and for the purpose of sal e, 1 ease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ord,ihances prior to issuance of building permits.
10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Corrrni ssi oners Resol uti on #77-1392 be i ni ti ated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non-significance has
been lssued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date, the
official file, written comments and/or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's likely
significant adverse impacts to the physical environment; a
finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse
impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a
resul t of the project, and a fi nal decl arati on of
non-significance is hereby to be issued.
~
i
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
NO COMMENTS RECEIVED.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
Di strict.
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this ~
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for thi s project shal l be proi ded i n
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to
future areawide collection systems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to
making application for a septic tank permit.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane
County Health District prior to the issuance of any building
permi t for thi s project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
7
~
3
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued)
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer9 the use of on-site sewage systems may be
authorized.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social and Health Services.
6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohi bi ted.
8. Note: There appears to be insufficient space available for
on-site sewage disposal systems serving the structures as
depicted on the site development plan.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
l. The site is located in Fire District # 1.
2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and
existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible
and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said
numbers shall contrast with their background.
3. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
4. Building permits will be required for each structure.
5. Each structure shall be accessible to fire department apparatus
by way of access roadways with all-weather driving surface
capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. The
minimum paved roadway width, inside curb face to inside curb
face, shall be twenty-four (24) feet with no parking. Parallel
parking is permitted on one side with road widths a minimum of
thirty (30) feet. Parallel parking is pemitted on both sides
with road widths a minimum of thirty-six (36) feet. Signs
noting such is required for fire lane. The turning radius of
private roadways and drive aisles shall be a minimum of twenty
(20) feet inside and a minimum of forty-five (45) feet outside
to the curb face. Cul de sacs more than six hundred (600) feet
from the center line of the nearest cross street shall have a
minimum radius of thirty-seven (37) feet, six (6) inches (75
feet diameter).
/o
.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT (continued)
6. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be
installed prior to any construction. These hydrants shall be
placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than
175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the 1 owest outl et of
the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A
water pl an showi ng each f i re hydrant ( speci fyi ng the gal l ons per
minute for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in
Chapter 10.04 of the Uni form Fi re Code i s requi red prior to
construction of the water service. All required fire protection
facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and
during the time of construction.
7. Comments: The proposed garage structures wi 11 requi re a mi nimum
of a one hour rated wall, which is adjacent (less than 20-feet)
' from the property line. This wall will be required to be 30"
(Parapet) above ga rage roofs.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
l. Water Purveyor is 7rentwood Irrigation District #3, and they
will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses, but indicate that adequate mains need to be
provided.
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
l. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may requi re use of water sprays, tarps, spri nkl ers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions f rom
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
f rom unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean. Rockwell should be paved
pri or to or as part of any approval of thi s project.
4. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and f rom motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
ti
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
VARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY (continued)
5. All air pollution regulations must be met.
6. Additional Comments. The applicant has addressed air impacts by
stating compliance with Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authori ty regulations.
~
~
9
♦
UhhICE OF CnUNTY @NGINP.ER
ti PUKANE COUNTY, wIASH I NGTON
-1- + i y ~i ~j
i'(~ tiExik iii~ (.c-mit y!'I.tiiitlng Oepat Iint-tiC
~FtOM ~A-111i11[v 111?"ili< 01 ' , I)Npartinenf
SIiH IhGI C4)iid1C {ciwti (►t Appti)val-%t)ne ('harlgt--Number
AI)plicanr'q Name C-R~S1~ E►,~.ZV ~ 5 S
Section z Townshi' z,a_N,~ Et,atigP EWM
'llie followlnK condi[iu~tts oF approva1 Eor the atove-referenced zune change are submitted co
t.he Spokane CA)unty Neartn}; Fxiiiiliier Cbmmittee for incltision in [he staff -inalysir, and
E 1 ndi,~g,; and arder uf the he.iring tcheduled 19 85.
~
Prior To The Ieeuance Of A Building Perait
1. Applicant shall decilcdte feet on
for rigtit-of-way pclor to any use of the property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right-of-way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property. ~
3. Applicant shall dedicate a foot radius on
and prior to any use of the property. ~
4. Applic.an[ shall deciicate feet on end a foot cedius on
and for right-of-wey prior [o any use of che proper[y.
S. Access permits for approaches to the County Road Sy8[em ehell be obtained fcom the
Spokane County Engineer.
6. Access permite and i.mnrovements to mue[ be approved
by the Washington Department of 'Itansportation.
7. Access permits and improvements to must be approved
by the City of .
38 (a) Applicant shall improve in a manner coneistent with Spokane
County TYPiCAL roadway section Nb. 2 minimuID peving width S#-Ana AR.t~
(b) Applicant shall improve 1n e menner conBietent vith Spoka►ie
County TYPICAL rc,adway section IJo. minimum peving width .
(c) Applican[ shall improve ' in amanner coneistent with Spokane
('.ounty TYPI('AL co~adway gection No. minimtim paving width .
(d) Appl ican t shal l imprnve in A manner rnnsi stent wi th Spok3nr
Co(in[y TYPIGAL. roadway SeCtion Nc). min.tmum paving wid[h .
(e) n[her ;perifir 1mprt)vemc•nfC% L,M~~~,lc? C~el'r5 ~"t~ Qc~~~,3 i~k L .S~j/
bQLA
y, Afy l (r,j ►t t ~Ir, 1 I ~4rtwii t II ppro~v31 hy thN 5I)r, k -irie G) unCy Nn};inPt r roac1, c1ra tn•~~~t,
aVci 1►1 lrl ljr io►r t I,I I<<,I i,i ii ( e i) t i hiii ld i ng permi t un the properCy.
~iq +nt p h ~ It ~,hii, l t ft) r i~iprt) va l hy tlit `•~~c~kaiie (.k) lan[y Hiig iiit,c~I aitd the ti~~~~ ~>>F
~ri t y }1, t 1 t 1, I►? i1+ t i f It .1 twnhi ii, im ti I Cr tit w ike `.ytit vm 1)Iin ~nd tilir wIt I I
I 1 ;I I IrI tr i rlot'" I i i 1 pt 14) r t" t!it i`~ii~n~ a r~ f ~ny hiii 11i nt~ ;u t mt t
rtv
C_j~
~
i
:
~
r
ZI) A Nir I. 1 ii~ liii aii,i Ct a 1 t i< < 1 i c u 1aL t c►ri I ►1 a ti ~ltd ! l be -,ul>lnl [ tv d rii)d -jppr+, vud hy Cht.
~)Ik)kaiit_ (.►iil►Cy l itbiiiLet En fur Ci) Lhe i55uAiILe uf a bu11,diitb prrniL[ o+i Lhr property. 1 114z
dNs lgii , luca[i, in , I nLi arta~t gemt-iit ot paikiug stdlls sh,j 11 te in av<ot danct- with 5[ait(iard
tratfi( titgliieerI itg J)1 ci~~~LO_5. Yavi~~g or 5urfacinb ds appco~veJ hy the County Lngineer,
ai l! be i equi reci tor dny FN)rt iun of tl~e pruject whlch is tu be ucc iii,ied or travNl led by
vehtclLy.
12 The wut J a ppli4-ant 5ha11 tiiclude tiie owner or owners uF the NroNv-rty, hib lieirs,
ab5lgiih, and suc.t-t55(ac s.
13. lo cunr,truLC the road tinpruvemeiirb 5tated herein, the applicant may, with the approvel ut
the Guunty Engineer, jain in and be a wi111ng participant in any petition or resolution
which purExise is the foroiarion of a Road Iinprovement Distric[ (RID) for said improvemen[
purbuant to KGW 36.88, as ainended. Spokane Cvunty will not participate in the cost of
these imNrovemen[b.
14. As dn alternative cnethod of c.onstruc[ing the road improvemenC statrd herein, the appli-
cant mdy, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplisti the road improvements
stated herein by Joining dnd participating in a County Road Project (CRE') to the extent
of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not perticipate in the cost of
these improvemenCs.
.
S. The c.onarructi.on of the rodd iinprovementa atated herein shall be accomplished as ap-
proved by the Spokane County Enginzer.
16 All required improvemerits bhall conform to the current State Of Wabhingtun Standerd
Specifications fur Rvad and Bridge Construction, and other appliceble county s[andarde
and or adopted resolutions perteining to Road 5tanderds end Stormwater Menagement in
effect at the daee of construction, unlese otherwiae approved by the County Engineer.
17. AppZicant shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to
eny use of the proper[y.
28. Applicant shall conetruct a peved and deIineHted accese approach(s) to meet the exieting
pavement on . °
19. Accees to Road ehall be prohibited un[il euc,h time as 8pecificelly
authorized by the SNokane County Engineer.
S Roadwdy standards, typical roadway sec[ione and drainage plan rrquirementa are found in
Spokene Board of County Conunissioners ReBOtution No. 80-1592 ae amended end ere applicablt
to this propusal.
21. This plat or develupment prupobal is located within a drainage baain which hae been
ident if ied by the Spokane Gounty Engineer's Uf f ice ae heving stormwater runof f probleau5.
Since this pla[ or development propoeal is affected by or i8 a oontriburor to stormrwacer
flowb, property owners shQuld participate in the planning and implementation af e future
basinwicie btorimWa[er manc+krinent aybtem. The following Candi[ion of Approval' ehall he
reytiired Tlidt the uwner(s) ur buc,cebbur(s) in interest abree to join in any Cownty
appruvEdd 5tormwater MdtiaKemt_nt Prokram dtld to pay sueh rd[es and c harKes as mdy te fiKfd
through puhlic I,earings fur herviLe or herieFit obtalned by the planning, de,Ign, coii-
atruL[1,ng, mdintafiiing, or uperatton ot sturinweker contcul fat i1itie5.
~ Z~ ~ b~ rY~ w I YiN 2~. ~ v
A can c~ 2, y h Y o~ cv a A 1..4 r3 m`- ~ t" ~ x~ si5
C 1.J Aw i:. c ►1 Y'c
~E ~ ZD /Yc v7A ~
nr
~v~c O^c r esi1 , nv C E r ua Guv2~f ~~3.~~~1~
I u 7116 `_';/l r• c T. v~- 7~!
7 ~ 67 ~2
vu.~7y ~l ~~i'or To v r t'Yt , rv o 5
P P
AGENDA, JULY 3, 1985 TELEPHONE NO 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER THE ZONING NEARING EXAMINER
COMMITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12 00 NOON TO 1 30 P M FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED
ITEMS NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5 00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAIL-
ABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF TNE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE WILL TOUR ALL SITES ADUERTISED FOR THIS HEARING BY
COUNTY CAR AND ACCOMPANIED BY A SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNER, ON OR ABOUT MONDAY, JULY l, 19859
AT 9 00 A M FOR DETAILS CONTACT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE
900AM
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
1 ' TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
VE-70-85 VARIANCE FROM REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK
(Generally located adjacent to Rockwell Avenue, approximately
90 feet west of Best Road in Section 2-25-44 )
Comprehensive Plan Major Commercial and Urban
Proposed Use• Four Multiple Family Residences -
(24 Units)
Variance Request To allow a 27-Foot Front Yard Set-
back, whereas the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance, Section 4 07 130(c)
requires a 30-Foot Front Yard Setback
Site Size. Approximately 1.3 Acres
Applicant• CROSBY ENTERPRISES, INC.
P. 0. Box 13717
Spokane, WA 99213
n o t e. This application is a request for two separate
actions. The first, a zone change, will be heard by the
Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. The second, a Variance,
will be heard by the Zoning Adjustor The two items will
be heard concurrently by both Boards
2 ZE-42-85 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
(Generally located at the southwest corner of Mission Avenue
and Vercler Road in Section 15-25-44 )
Comprehensive Plan Urban
Proposed Use. Hospital, Medical Office Building,
and Multiple Family Units.
Site Size Approximately 20 Acres
Applicant• D. J. HUME
500 Columbia Building
Spokane, WA 99204
(continued)
s t
r t
t ~
r o4 ~'!3r ti t `ot ~
~
tl 4 wr~~ ~ ~ ~
-%AA~7
~ e t
< 1' ~
e y ""1~• _ ~ ,
d ~T ~
1,0
h ~
' N ~ ` ' { 1 , ~ r\v
4 ~ O
4 i
y 'i 0/'y
4 7
}t4
r ~ w
Q t i '1l „ ~ tl
r.-
. ' ~ .
~ « ~ ~ h h ~GfiJ ~ T
a ~
. ~
tf 4 i 6 ~ ~ ~
S
,,,~~~yyy 4
~ ~i~ ~ ~
t.Ot~
~
$t
x ~ ,
. r
. ,
~
a ~ R,4s pAT A a,
~
124 56,
R " -36 3
,T
T1 44
.
~
f r
~ •
. .,ti ~
~
~ ~
~
1 ~
Js
,
~
p~ ~ a s' 25 ;
. ~
~
~ i
i
O
0 i
~ R
i „
~
r
, t
t ~
i ~
~ 0 ~
„ 1
~ N ? ti
o
.
vi
0,
~
~
- Q , o
o ~ m lA
r ' c
r,
0` G ~
Or ~
c o 4L-
v
- ~ ,
STATE OF WASEiINGTON
ss
County of Spokane
nn this day personally appeared Yefore me Nora B. Ferrell, dealing in her separate property
~ to me known to be the individual descnbed in and who executed the within and faregoing ulstru►iient, wirt
acknowlociged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary n et anci deecii ~o► this
,
, w..e+r t'f
iiges and pur{oqeS therein mentioned
~
SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230(3) Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
D E T E R M I N A T ION OF NON - S I G N IF I C A N C E - "DNS"
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-61-85 and YE-70-85
PROPONENT: CROSBY ENTERPRISES, INC., c/o Wes Crosby -(509) 922-2200
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed rezone from Two-Family Residential (R-2) to
Multiple Family Suburban on four separate lots, totaling a~ot proximately 1.5
Acres, for the purpose of constructing a six-plex on each (total of 24
Units A1 so incl uded i s a requested Front Yard Setback Yari ance f rom
requirements of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance to allow one of the
buildings to have a 27-foot front yard setback, whereas Section 4.07.130-(c)
requires a 30-foot setback.
LOCATION of proposal, including street address, if any: Generally located
adjacent to Rockwell Avenue, approximately 90 feet west of Best Road in
Section 2-25-44.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does
not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI
Position/Title - Spokane County Zoning Administrator Phone -(509)456-2205
Address - Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 J efferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
DATE ISSUED: June 14, 1985 SIGNATURE:
This °DNS" is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date issued (see above).
COMMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAH JULY 2, 1985 by 5:00 P.M.
APPEAL Of This Determination may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal deadline is
the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days
after the si gni ng of the Fi ndi ngs and Order. Thi s appeal must be wri tten and
must be prepared pursuant specific criteria on official appeal forms. Contact
the above Responsible Official to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA
appeal.
Thts uDNS" Form was mailed to agencies and departments as noted below.
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane)
3. WA State Dept. of Social and Health Services
4. Spokane County Health District 5. School District - East Yalley #361
6. Fire District #1
7. Water District - Trentwood Irrigation District #3
8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
9. ' 208' Water Qual i ty
0. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 10
i
~ ~
Z E 61 8 5
i
.1+1 E r c 4~ ~ y< V E < 7,0
ENVIRONMENTAL
.
CHECKLIST
~
SPOKANt ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
~ e
~ > >
! " ' t
SECTION 11.10.230(1)
~ ~ F •
fi
~ ► ~ t ~ ' fi : . } ~ } ! ~
t
v
. , ,
~
~
.
r
.
dPOXANC EIiVIflONNBN'fAl. ORDINANCE
(MAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11 10 230(1)
Eovironmental Checklist V L-F' 72>45
Ff le No ZE --,e' / 45
Purpoae of Cneckliou
!he State Hnviroaaental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43 21C BGIi, nquires all govarwental agenciea to eoneider the environaental lmpact• oE • proposal
pefore mking deciaions M Environmental Impect Stateoent (EIS) nuet De prepaced for a11 propoeal• vith proDeble eignlflcant adverse lopacta on
th: Qwlity of the *ovicoaoent She purpose of thie eheckliat !o to provide informacion to help you and the egency identify lopecte frao your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid Sopact• froa the proposel. !f it can be done) aod to help the agencq decide vhether an 6IS !o required
Instructions for Applicantss
1`his environaeatal eheckliat aska you to descriDe sann Eu ic infonetlon ebaut your proposal Governnental agencies use thie checklist to determine
vhether the enviroc►men[sl 1mpact• of your proposal are •lgeificent, requiring preparetloa of an 6IS Anever the Questions brlefly, vith the ■oot
precise infotmacioa knovn, or give tAe best descrip[!on you cen
You ■uot ansver each quescion accurately and carefully, to the Deat of your knovledge In ■oat caeeo. yov •hould be eDle to anevtr [he questioas
from your ovn observations or project plans vitl►out the need to hire e:perte If you reelly do oot knov the anover, or !f a queotion does aot epplq
to your proporal, vrite "do not knov" or "does not apply " Casplete anevers to the queotione aov oay avoid unnecesoary delaya later
Soae Questions ask aAout governaeetal regulations. such as soniag. •horeline, and lendmsrk designstiono Anaver these questions !f you cnn If you
have probless. the governaental agenciee can asaist yau
TAe checklist Questlons apply to all parts of your proposal. even lf qou plaa to do thein over a period of time oc on different percel• of lend
Attach any additional infotnatioa that vill descrlDe your proposal or it• environuental effecta The agency to vhich you w Do1t thie eheckliet sey
ask you to explain your ansvers or provide additioael lnforvatlon reasonaDly releted to deteceining 1f thece oay be •lgniflcant adveroe iopect
Use of checklist tor nonprojact proposals:
Cmplece tAi• cAecklist [or noaproject proposala, eveo Chough questiocu oay De ansvered 'doe• not apply'
IN ADDITION, cmplete the 6UPPil.lMNTAL SHEa2 TOB NONP80JECT ACTIONS(Part D)
For nonproject actlons. the references !a the cAeckliot to the vords "project." 'appllcant.' aud "property or •ite" ehould be read ss "propoeal,
"psoposer,. and "affeeted geographie area." respectivelq
A dACKGROfJND n +
1 Na~e of proposed pro~ett, if ~pplicable `E_61-85, Zone reclassification request, R-2 t0
Multiple Famil,y Suburban, Rockwell Avenue.
zN..e of Applicaata Crosby Enterprises, Inc.# % Wes Crosby
3 Addras• and phoae msber of applicaat or contaet person We B C ro sby, E. 7712 Sky1 i n e Dri v e, Sp ok an e,
Washington 99212
4 Date checklist prepared: Ma'Y 20, 1985
s~enc, seatw.t1,~ ctwckii.t, Spokane C ounty Planning C ommi ssi on
6 Proposed tising or schedule (locludlnQ phasing. ii applicable)t r all 1985
7 a Do yau haw any plane for future additioni. enpansion. or furtlrc r activity nlated to or connected vlth thi• propoaslT If yee, explaio
No. .
b Do yov ova or haw optioas on laed nearby or adjacent-to thi• proposalt If,,yes. •xplaio
No. * '4
8 Liat aay eavironmental infoesatloa rou kaov •bout that hu Deea prepared. or vill De prepsred. directly releted to thi• proposal
R w of sewage disposal aystem b.y S~akane Courit r~Health Distric t. ,
- 6xD 70 ~
~ ati.r r aR; !'`e
BPORAliE BHVIAO?FN'EHTAL ORbINANCE
(wxC 197-11-960) aacrton 11 ra 230(i)
ik 6A[aLCRQIftM (eontinued)
g pa pau knpiy u1leChar appiitatlon$ is'e pemding far goverrmenta1 appravali of 4Ck1er propooala dlrtctly a#EeCkfn$ the proplTt}r caveted 6y ynur
pruposrlY I,f yes rKplain
NQ • ~
10 List any gavernment +pprovtlo or pemita that wfil be [14lded f4C pour propassi, i!' kno+nn Buildi-ne permits, e
Cilt"ityl aCcPRg DAL'mLLta, Mr2npit ineer' ~ ice•;
~ v ~
~~lC
S e~e d~.gpos~.1 I~ea~-t~► Diptrict: zone reclassi~'lc
~ Spokane County Plaannina Commiss~ong
11 Give brief coopltte devsription uf yaur prcpoaai, intludin$ tte praposed uaea aed tne aise of the praject and elte There are sever8l
ques[icna lateti in [hia thecklla[ that 4kok ynu to de8CTlbe €ertain a6pecta a[ yauY propoaal You d4 nat need Yo repea[ th4ee snewers on [hie
mt `i
The applicant proposes the constructivn of four apartment buildings f one
vn eachof #'aur 1ati bi secte d by Ro~kwe 11 Avenue. Each'bu i lding wiZ~
~~~ommodaV~ ~ ~ ~ unila, BqJJdin&LWjJ1 be
2$ fee~ i Garages viill be,nrnvidpda~l n.ng the rear
~rv~ Ii~ o ~ ' ~ densi-ty to
0 from 8 un i t s (R- 2) tv 24 uni ts Murst2~h,~~i-;nse " ~ /If
i2 ax, tiflo o th roposal su[ftcieor~t ~af~,raatioo ta aperoc ~rour ,~rapoaed pYoject, •trett address, i# anp, aad seetioa, xo+~hip and rrngek i# knora If ~ rpaawould accur bve a rgnge of erea, provtde ahe range or
box»das#,e■ Qf Lh4 aite (a) Provide a 1egalydeaertQtion, slte pTpn, victss#Cy xa$ arid Copographtc ma,p, ff rsaeonabl}r available Hhile y4u
should mubmit aay plan■ required bg the agencg, you arfa noC requlre,d tc duplicate mapc ar detailed plaae submitted witk as,y permit epplicatian
releted Ca thls checkl3st
The proposal ~s lvcated vn Rockwell Avenue, approximately 110 feet west
of ~eat Rn y
Spenific rnaps and legal descriptions are an file wiA-the zone reclass-
ifigati+an rea~est.
13 doea Ehe prapaoed ac[ian Z!e rithie the Aquifee Senairive Area (h5l4)f 'the Cenerai 5ever Service Ateat `ihe Prioritp &r"r Servise Area# 3ht
.
City of Spakii►e$ (5eae Spekane County'a ASA 4verlmy Pone Atias far bvundariea)
fioe proposal is withiri the ASA, the GSSAt the PSSA and within Spakane
CounV. The prapvsal daes not adjoirx a shvreline.
T4 8E CQliPL$"!E~ ~Y APiYLICdpi' r ti f 3
D E?1VI&OKKKNI4 ELE'ElPTB
Evelua#!ao For
llgenr-yr Uoe Only
] FJkk1H
a Ceaesal dbmCClp[34n ot the •i[e {rtre1e one )t Flat M rallirtg, hill}r steep rlopes„ anuetaiuaw F
athers
TherBite is gBn8ra11y fla.t* gently sloped tD tha
siouth~ ,
b What is tkra ateepoit s1ope vn the ■3ke (approxlrate pwreant rlope)T
l.ess th8n 2% .
c Wat gensral typasi pl soils,/re laund aa thajsite (for oximplx+ cliy, u nd, rravel, peat,-.uek)4
if qflu kavr the cisvti#irotian of agritulturai iatls specify [hen ■nd nots otY priure tarmland
T'he site is Garrf snn'SGravel eand and laam. ~ The
site is nat -oroductive for arriculture without irarigativn.
d hra there aurfaee in+ditatioas or h#tC~ry of uasCab]e enfls in the imntedia[e vicinityT Lf to,
describe
@
6~
• u
SPOICANS ENVIRONKENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
d ENVIROtMNTAL HL8?IENTS(cont1nuQd)
Evoluation For
Agency Use Only
e Dssctlse the pucpose, tqpe, and •ppto=imate quaatitle• of •ny illllng or grading proposed
Indicate •ource of flll
Minor on-site grading will be required to accom-
modate the partial basementa, "208" drainage,
f Co,Yd •iosion occur as a reeult of clearing. constcuction, or useY If so, geeerally deserlDe
Surface areas will be exposes during a 3 month
construction period. Erosion would be minimal.
Construction activities wi11 conform to S.C.A.P.C.A.
guidelines.
g ADaut vhat percent of the •!te vill be covered vith Lpervious surfecee ef[er project conotruc-
tion (for exaople, asphalt or bu11dings)t
Typically, 50% of each site will be devoted to
buildings and parking areas.
~
> >
A Proposed eaasure• to nduce or coatrol •rosion. or other impact• to tM earth. If anqt
None.
, -
2 AIR
• uRiat type of qisoloas to tAe ait vould cesult traa th* propoaal (i e, dust. autcooDile.,odore
ladwcrial, wod smoke) duriag conatruction aed vhen the project i• completed? If any.
aener.iir a.•criee and Qive appro:luta auantlte• If kna+m ' (
Some duat could be created during the construction
phase. Proiect will conform to S.C.A.P.C.A.
Also, auto emisaions from approx. 200 auto trips. ,
e An tit,here any oif-site sources of eniomioas or odor that uy atfect your proposalt If so,
pnerally describe -
The si te is in the proximi ty of the 'Kaiser Aluminum ^
~ rolling mill, Spokarie°Industrial Park . It i s not
2nticipated that these- operations will' affect the*
PrOI)OR 1 I T J 1 l~( 4 , 6 1 1
t I ( L I i 1J)a =it I t, !)I I I I l i 1.) ,
e Proposed aeasures to reduce or eontrol tmissions or other lapacts to air, If any
Conformance to S.C.A.P.C.A. 'requirements.
a
~
3 WATER '
a Surfacec
(1) I• there aaq surtaca vater body on or in the losediate viciaity of the aite locludiog yeas-
roued and •easonal •treams. saltvater, lakes. ponda, vetlands)1 If yes. describe tqpe •nd
psovlde msss If apDroPriate, state vhu t•treas or river it flow lnto
No. Project ia approximately 1 mile north of
tpokane River.
L
(2) Will the project repuire •ny vork over, !n. or adjacent to (vithin 200 teet) the descriDed
raterst If yes, please describe and attach avoilaDle planr. '
N0 •
~ s
, '
(MAC 197-11-960) bectioa 12 10 230(1) 6POKANE ENVIR021FEN"fAL ORDINAHCE
'
D lNVIAOtI'l4E2iSAL RI.6lQ:N'fS (contlnued)
Evaluation Yor
AQencq Us• Oaly
(7) Est1Mte tAe asount of fill ond dredgo uterlal that vould be placed !e or rauoveE from the
•urtac• ratsr or w tland• and tadicate the •res of the ait• that vould be aifecteE Indicate
the source of fill satsrial
None.
~
~
(4) M111 the proposal requira surfeca w[ec vitAdrawlt or diveraioa&l Cive general descrlp-
tloo, purpose, and approxisate quantities 1f known
No.
(S) Does the proposal lie vltAin a 100-year flood plaint If •o. note locatioo on the •ite plan
No.
r~
(6)t,fDoea the prnposal lavolve any discharge• of wast• saterials to surtace vater@t If so.
describe't''tu type of vaats and aatlCipsted volwe of, discturgn ,
NO•~
, F• ~
b CttOUND
(1) Will ground w ter be vithdravnt or vill vatar De discharQed to ground vstert Give general
descrip,tion, purpose, and appro:iwto Quantitie• !f knove
No.{ The pro 3 ec t wi 11 be eerved by Trentwood T~ ~-`~O`- uO
uZe'°'~`~'" a . ~cS2'~.,a~x . '~.It'
Ir'ri~ati'on Diet.t ~ and will 1 uae Qn-site ~sewa~e
diaposal• sVstems until connected to a sewer. S~ b~ ~ Ff'A•
(2),,DpoeriDe vaste utarial LAat v111 ba dlscRarged lato the Qround fram •eptie tanks or othar
soattory raste treaokat facilitr Desertbe the Seneral s!u oi the iyates, the auaDer of
nousoa to be sarved (if applicable) or the ameer oi persons the •ystn(s) are e:peeted to •eeve
An interim $ewa,rge disposal svstem will hP d_ve'loped
foreach"nf~ the four.;~uildir,,grg ,seryiriz, .g tot t of
24 ho,useholds. , A pr,e,ssure system will,-,-,be installed
to Sp`okane County Hea].t~ District stan'dards. 54 ~,,,cktt,/t~
, ~ - , I . ,
D ~ JL/~
-+'r►"~1^~ ~-•~/CR~
(3) DescriAe any systeas. other tlun those desigued for the disposal of saeitary vaste,
lnitalled For thsipurpos• of aisclurginj flyidslbelov the Qrcuad surfacel(Soelude• systeps such U ~
as thoss for the disposal of •ton vater or Araiwge fram tloor draiaa) DescriDe the tqpe of
•rstem, the uount of.matsrial to bs disposod of through the •yscan and the trpes of aaterials
likaly to Do dtapwsd ot (iocluding astecial• vhicA say enter the aqstm i wdvsrtently through
spill* or ua result of fire tightiai activitiss)
The proposed use is residentialr with no spille
of hazardous materials `contemplated. The ei.te will
use "208" drai_naze ewales with agsociAtad a ywP718
t0 hanA 1 a gt,nrm y ff .
(4) M111 anr ehaical~a(eepecially ossaale solveats or prtrolsw tw 1s) ~stored in aDove
ground or uoderQtound storage tanlut If so. vhat type• and yuaatities of material• vill be
storedf
No. Residentisll use proposal.
~
• , . . a'N1'7 , . .'iT'+a1 . ~ sT'a . r^~•~it " ~~ir'C~''^^~'^ „ ~ , _ ,
6POKANB ENVIRONKEHTAL ORDINAHCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11 10 130(1)
S HNVIROtMNTAL ELEMEN?S (contfnued)
Eveluetlon For
• y ~ ,s ~ ~ Agency Use Only
(S) Nhat proteetive sessures rill be talu n to lasure that leaka or spills of eny chemieals
•tored or w ed on site vill not be alloved to percolate to tround water (th!• includo• eeasurec
to keep cReuicsls out of diapo"l systasa described in 3b(2) aod 3D(3)1
None. This is a re8idential uses proposal.
~
~
3 / 1
c Ynter Runoff (including •toro w ter)t
(1) Deocribe the •ource of runoff (lncludlnS oto n rater) and method of colleetion snd disposnl
if aay (include quan[ities, 1f kaovn) 1lflere vill tbis water flovt Will thio water flov into
other vatero4 If •o, descriDe
A storm water collection system will be desigmed
for ~thesite -conforming to "208" etudy requirements, ~
inGl ~,~n ~rassv nercolation areas with eupr~lgmental
d~lls, u h systems will. b_e_.c.onfinPd tQ thesite.
(2) 11111 aay chemical~L Dt •tored► Aandled or used on the site in • locacion vhere •*pill or ~
leak will drain to ourface or ground water or to s atocm water disposal eystea discharging to
surface or ground vater!
Noo
~
.
(3) Could waste aaterials antpr, ervuod or surface a tersY lf •o, generallq describa
No.J This is a residential use proposal.
,
d Proposed messnras to reduce or control surface. grouod, and ruaoff water lapacto. if aay (if
t6e propossd action lies vltAin the ACUif<r Se w itivo /lru be esQaclally clur on e=planations
relating to facilitit• coaeernin= Sectioaa 90(4). 3D(5). and 9c(2) oi thi• Cdeekliep
Surf ac e runof f wi 11 be handled by " 20 8" drainage
awalea to SPokane County Standards. Zone reclassification `
c onditions will reauj= U.L.I.D. statements to
hook up to°future sewer systems extended to the
4 PL.,NTS axea.
• Chgc~ or circle type of vegetatlon fouod oa the •itee -
deciduew Creea alder. maple, u peo. other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, piae, oihar -
~ shcubr
X grtss
. v..cur.-
crop or sralo
uetsoil plants. cattail, buttetcup, bullrush, akualc caDbage, othnr
vater plaats: water lilly, eelgru s. •ilfoil, other
othar types of vegecatlon
D Mhat kind acd uauet of vogetation vill be sooved or alteredt VP ge t a ti on On tlt e
site will be removed to accomiaodate buildings,
prk ng areas, and landscaping,~
c Liat thrsitensd or endaassred specie• knovo to De op os oeas thw aite N one .
The project is within an urbanized area.
d~ Psoposed landocapingg uaa oi native plants. or other measun • to preverve or eahance vegetation
oa tlie •ltt, !i sert ~ The project will use turf, trees and shrubs.
~
,
~
6POICANE ENVI&ONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
B 6NVIAOIQQ't1TAL eL6lENTS (continued)
6valuatloo Por
~ Agency Use Only
S ANLKW.S
a Circle any bird• and anioala vhich Mve been observed on or oeac the •!te or •re koovn to be on
or near the sitet
birdsi havk, heron, eagle, songbitda, others phPasants. iqMq I 1 'ni reiS _
.am.l.= deer, Dear, elk, Deever. otheT miee and small rodents,
fiaht bass, snlnon. trout. harring, shellfish, ocheri +
o[hert
D Liat any threetened or endangered •peciei knam to be on or near the oite
None. The project is within an urbanized area,
c Ir the •!te part of •■lgratioa routet If so* e:plain
No. The pro3ect is within an urbanized area.
d Propoaed measure• to preserve or eahance vildlife. if any
None. ,
6 ENERCY AND NA'IVRAL RESOURCES
a Whet kinds of energy (eleetric, aatural gas, vood stove, soler) vill De uaed to mest the
the coapleted project'• cnergy aeeds9 DeocrlDe vhether it vill be used for heating, unufac-
turlag. e[c
Elec tricity will be used #'or lighting, spact heating.
,
,
e Yould your project affect the potential uee of solar eoargy Dq adjaceat propertiest If •o, w
Qenera117 describe
No, the apartment buildings are almost 60 feet
f
_,roperties.
from northerly property lines of adjoining
c Mhac kinda pf energp conservation featuns are included lnithe 'plans ofit4`i• propoaalt List
tother proposed sessure• to reduce os coa[rol energy lopacts, ii anq: _
The projec t wi 11 c onf orm -to U. B. C., and insulati on
will,be provided to financing' and building code ~
guidelines, ~
~
~
.
7 ENVIBONMENTAL BEALili
a An thece an7 envirouseatal hsalth 1uzerds, includiag ezposure to toxic eheslu 1s. risk of firt
and e:plosioo, spill. or hasardous vaste, that could otcvr as a result of t6!• proposalf If go.
deseribe
No. This is a reeidelitial proposal*
(1) Oescribe special smrtency •ervices ttu t■ight be required
None.
~
J
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
D., LNVIROIQ~NTAL ELEKENTS (contlnued)
6value[!o~ For
Agency Uoe Only
l.~IVIRONKEN?LL F1E~AL?H
(2) Propoa~d ~e~~ures to reduea or control •nviro~w atal he~lth has~rd~. !f any
None.
b Noi~~s •
(1) Mh~t typas of aoi~! e:i~t !e tRe ~r~~ vhich ~sy ~ff~ct your pro~ect (for exu ple tr~ffic~
eQuip~ant~ operation. otherf .
The site is affected b~ traffic noise from Trent
Avenue and commercial operations alon~ Trent ,~~P.
(2) Mhat typ~s ~nd l~v~l~ of noi~a vould be ere~tsd Dy or a~~oci~t~d vith the pro~ect oa •
~hqtt-tees or a loa~-te n ba~i~ (for e:aoplee traffic. conatn+etioe~ operation~ othart tndicate
vh~t hour~ aoi~e vould eoM irc~ the ~1te
2'lae ► a~grtment ~~ro ~ ec t wou~d produc e some addi ti onal
,
traffic noise on Rockw~lt AvP1n~e~ and Best leading
t0 ~rent Avenue. Cnnatru~t~ on Arti vi ti eg wni~l r~
~rndv[~p ghnr+ +arm r~ni _
(3) Propoa~d ~e~~ur~ to reduce or coatrol noise ispact~. if ~nyi
None. •
~ .
8 LAND AND SF10itELlNE U8E
a Mh~t is t!u curr~nt u~e of the •!te ~nd ad~acent yrop~rtle~l 111e 8 Y. t e 1 s vae an t•
Land uses to the north, east and west are e~n~le family,
e ~:~~~.i~4►~'~~~'n~dr~~i~4~f ~~uF~~'i~.al to ,the 'south:f
No t rec entl,y .
4 ,
~ ~ ~
c D~~eribe any •tcuetur~~ oo tha •ita
None. ,
d Yill any •truetus~• b~ daoli~hedf If •o. vhlcAt
NO.,
, ~
e` Mh~t is t6e curcant coninQ cl~~~ific~tion ot the •!t~!
~ R- 2 Tw0 '
, famil~r residential .
t Yh~t tR~ eurr~nt ea~pr~hanain pl~o desiseutioa ot cM ~ittT ~ 1_ n n~ C7~~ _r/,~ t, Q.
/Cy- c..: Fi w~ .~~.c~
Urban. •
w~
~ It ~p~lic~~l~~ M►~t tM curt~at ~hoc~liw sast~r pto~re~ de~isnation of the ~it~f _Q ~J-~~ -F~j~,~j,~ ~~S/~OV..~-
^ ~'W Cx L a
N~A ~ . ' ~o~. ~o ~ ~ _ -
, i,~ r' t 5~~~~ Q~('`~
A Ha~ ~n~ past at the •it~ b~~a ela~~i[!ed an "~a~iro~null~ •en~iti~' ~re~T Ii •o. /n C
~p~cii~ f • ~
NO . - ~ ~ 1 ~ ~-~4
l
~ ~ ,C~ (b~~~~ d6a~e
i~ App~oai~a ul~ hoM saar peopl~ vould r~~ide or vork !o t!u cc~plet~d pro~ett
Approximately~0 persons. ~
~ - .~,..L..~s...... ~ t ....~a..Sy.~'.aL„~ . sw~~ w~ ~ ~2 .i
v 13w~° tC.a_ ` --~~.s`~~ ~~:~'~'~---~u~sC.-~. ~ - ~3rf A 't` ` ~A~'~'
~ IPo[A!!E 6lQVIRONMENTAL ORDI21MiCE
(YAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
D ENVIItOlMTAL RI.ElENTS (contieued) '
Cvaluation Por
Agency Use Only
j 1lypto:inately~h0w asoy people would the eampleted ~ptOsect displaceT None • ~
k PrososeJ sei w na tolaaold or'reduce dlsplaceaent.impacRs. ii anye +c ~
None, requireed. r ,
. c
1 Piopoaed seasures to eosure the proposal i• compaEibl, vlth e:istin= and projected laad uses and
plans. if aays ~
. The project will employ uerimeter fencingr building
~,~A~ .
_ Iiw~.r.epTIIIIlQn r dr VP_ W2YR-'T-A~r-~
aesthetic architecture to reduce or mitigate ..4
im~ac_t_s on adjoining residential vropertiee
9 HOUSING
a Approxluate1y hov •any unit• would De provided, St anyt Indlcata vhether high, ■iddla, or
lo+~- lacom howias l'
Project~wilY'provide 24 ho'using unit-s in middle range.
1. 4 t , ~ ~ t 6._ t
b Appro:iNtaly Aov uny uatts, !i any, would MeliaiaatedY Iadiu te vhether high. aiddle.or
lov-iataae houslng
None, s{ •
c Proposed msrsures,to reduce or control housing $mpacts, I[ 4nys6, +o
Th,e=poject accomtaodates a, peed for housing near
employ.ment centers such as Kaiser Aluminum and
the-5Dokane Industrial Paxk.
io eesrxcrtcs
a Mhit io the" talleat Aeight oi any ptoposed structure (s). oot lacludint antemiae, vfiac 1• the
principal ezteslor building matesial(s) proposedl _
The buildgngs will be 21 stories or 28 feet in ~ -
he'ight: ~ Exteriors will be _wood siding,,, composition
roof B ~ wiF th ° dec orative ` ~ f # ' ' ' i ,
co,n,formoo
l other housina z in the vic iniatv.
_I
D Nhat viovs ic the luedlace vicinlty would bo altesed os oDstsuetsdt
None. The area is relatively flat.
'
e Propoaed sessuras to reduca oc coatrol aesthatic inyacts. if aay:
Perime ter', f enc in~r`, 1J landsc apih&# ~ aesthetic
building design. '
. _
11 LICHT MTD CLARL
a Yhat type of 11ght or slare vill the proposal producet Ylut tiM ot day would it nainly occurl
Some light' ,will fi~e produced &by vehic le headlights, "
and securi ty lighting of garage areas and walkways.
to ~ l, .lilii ~ 9
l ~ l~!
b Could light os glare iram the tioisAed pso,r ct be a safaty hasasd or interta n vith viavet
U J T ~13z 1 ' , ;
No
4 ! 1 . `.J t~~ I s l 1, J i I { ~
c Vhet esisti~ oft-site sources ot ll~ht or ilara say aifect your proposalt '
None.
d Proposed mu sure• Lo ceduee or coatrol 11Qht snd glare Impaets, !f anys
,
Only residential lighting,fixturee will be used. ~
~
~ ~
~ • SPOKANE LNVIROtA{CN?AL OADIlQANCL ~
(MAC 197-11-960) Sectioe 17 10 290(1)
3, LNVI[0lRLENlAL [L6KLNTS (eoatiowd)
Evaluation For
Agency Ure Only
12 RBCAEAlIOH '
a Mhat designeted •nd infotsal rec nstiooal opportunitieo are in the inaedietely vieinityt
Spokane County maintains numerous parke along the
Spokane River includina Plantes Ferry. Schools
to the north have open playground areas. (Trentwood)
D Yould the propoasd prosact displaca any exiating recreatioaal useot If so. descriDe
No. The property is vacant. ' $
c Proposed oaasu n• to reduee or control impact• oa recreatioa, including recreation opportuaitiee
to De provlded Dy the projact or •pplicant, if anyt
No designatedirecr'eational activitiee are proposed.
, ' r ` C 0
~
d A < t
13 HISTORIC AND CULTUWIL P&ESERVAT20N
s Aro tRite any,plae*• or vbject• 1isted oa. oT 1proposed for altioaal, •tate. os loeal pre p rva-
tion reglatSr• kaow to De oa or w:t to the •itet If so. stnerally describe
No. The Mull'en Road ''passed through' ~he general
vicinity. ` " ` • '
a A~
t k 1
b Genarally deseriDa aery laadu rke or evideace of historlc archaeological. scieatific or cultural
importanu kuovn to De on or ne:t to the •ita
None indic ated .
r~ • ;
a
c Ptopoaed wsauns to reduce or,eoatsol lspacts, if anr:
During the cti_on,phase, thg Droject will
conform to-Spokane County Histerie Preservation '
~
~ 14 TRANSPOR?AtIOl1o 0 rd inanc e s. - -1
a Ideatity puDlie •treet• aad h!`hrars .aervi" the site$ aod describe proposed access to the
exietietg •treet qstam 8hov oo •it• plaw. !f aAy
Rockwell Avenue bisects the sitet providing ~
ace$a to 'Best ' Road `and Trent Avehue . ~ ' ` t j '
b L sito cusrentlr served Dy puDlic transitT If aoto vhat As the appro:laats distaaee co the
nureat tsa"it •topt Wl, a
Transit service,is avaf lable rat r Trent .Avenue . 5
c Bev many padtlns •paCes woula fn, couplettd psojeCtipawl,,lpv tuoy vould the pioSack eliaitsa[eT :
The project would provide 36 parking spacea per
the ordinance reQuirement. Twenty-four of the
epaces would be garages or carports.
d Mill the propo"l seQuire aay aew swdo or street@, or laprowoent• to e:istiog rwds or street@
oot ioeludlna drivewapsf Ii so. geaarally d*scribo (lodi ute vMther puDlic or private)
Existing Rockwell could be improved through the
R* I• D, uroc Qss • DrivewavB to - parking areas behf.nd
the bui 1 di ngg w 1'l hp orAd _d Ar►d avPd Rockwell
is currently a izravel road.
~ 0 Yill the projeet we (os otcur !o the inediete viclnitq of) wter. rail, or air tranrportationt
If •o, geatrally descriDe
No. >
9 ~ .
, 6POKAtlE ENVIRONNENTAL OADINANCH
(MAC 197-11-960) Sactlon 11 10 230(1)
! ENVIROiMBNL1L ELBMBNT3 (continwd)
Bvalwtion lor
Agertcy Use Onlq
f Hov many whicular trip• per day vould be generated by the coapleted projactt If knovn.
iadicate vhen peak vould occur
Approximately 200 vehicular trips per day would
be generated b.y the 24 apartment units with peak
hours at 8 100 a.m. end :00 n.m •
g Propoaed measure• to rcduce or coatrol transportation ispac[a. if anyt ~
Central placement of driveways for access to
Rockwell Avenue, participation in future R.I. D.
to pave Rockwell Avenue, including curbs and
eidewalks. Site is one block from Trent Avenue.
15 PUBLIC SEBVICES
a would the project result !n •n lacreased aeed for public •ervlces (for e:ample Fire protectlon,
poliee protection health care, •chools. other)1 If so, genecally descriDe
The development of 24 apartment uni ts would create
an incremental demand f or public services. Con-
struc tion of s truc tures would c onform to bui lding
and fire code reauirements#
p Propooed •eaeures to reduce or eoa[rol direct ispact• oa publlc servlces, !f anys
The completed project will allow additional tax
revenues which will offset the cost for the
additional services.
16 U?ILIiIES
• Circle utilities cucreatly availaEle a[ the site electricity. oatural gaa. veter, refuQe
•ervice, teleplioae. •aaitarq tever, septic •ystea. ZtM
The apartment project will require the installation
of a pressure field for sewage diBposal.
b Deseribe the utilitle• thst are prop'ooed for the psoject, the utility providing the •ervlce and '
the aeoeral coaatructioa activitie• oa the •i[e or in the iemediete vicinity vhicA sight Ae
aeed ed
Electricitv to be provided bv W.W.P.f water by
Trentwood Irrigation Dist., refuses by Suburban.
No major construction will be required to extend
these services.
C SICNAIVRE
1. the undersigaed, svear uoder the penalt7l of per)ury that the above reoponaes are aade truthfully and to the best of sy knovledge I also
understand tbat. •hould there De •nq villful mlarepresentation or villful laek of full dlselosure on oy pert, the 2Aency uy vithdrev aay
determinatioo of nonrignificance thet it might issue !n reliance upoa this ehecklist
Date May 20, 1985 praponent Croaby Enterprises. Inc., by Wes Crosby.
(Pleaae Prin[ or 'lypa)
~ Proponent: Addres• 1. 7 7/ An,
,
Phone
Person co.p~~~ing tor.t J. D. Konen, E. 4124 - 2V~h Ave. att, MaY 1-9, ~
Phone -514-6668
TO8 8'fAl! USL ONLT ~
r
Staff Meober(s) Reviovina Cheekllst ~
eased on thi• •taff revlev of the envicoameetal cAeckliat and other pertincnt lafoeution, the stafft
A&' 9SConeludes that [here ace ao proDable •ignltleant adverse impac[s and recamsand• a deteninatioa of nonsisnificeaee
S Concludes that probable •igaiflcant adverse anvlroseotal lmpacts do exlst tor the current proposal and recoreads a■itigated deter- ~
■loatioa of aonsisai[icancs rtth condition• ,
C Coacludes that tM re are proDaDl• •lQniticant ad w ne •nvisomental impacts aad recosead• a detenioation of sianifieaeee
IO TILINC TEE - 175 00
n _ _ _ _ J Ya~ . • _ ~..'w
.
h
~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING OEPARTMENT
,
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
~
Date: ~~9; h--5- Application No:
~
Name of Appl icant • C/)"O>Qj~ -e-s
Street Address of Applicant: 405 7 7-o L S~,~
~
City: 72J&" State: Gciv Zip Code: Tele. No. ~2.~ • 2z.~ ~
~ r
Name of Property Owner(s): 01?nse~, , P
Authorized Agent representing Owner
' (if other than owner) : &J e-s- C-) ~a s J~~ .
te Existing Zoning Classftication: o~ - 2
~ Oate Existtng Zone Classjfication Established: ,
.
Existing ' Use of Property:
,
Proposed Zone Classification: M)a
_
r
Proposed Use of Property: 6 Q/•e~
,
l.egal pescription of Property: L~ ,
2 S'e. g~
' 4?4F b- ~ ~v o .vs
~
y
^
~ }r s
.
.
~
s '
~ . t
- 1 - i
y
SeCtion: 02 Township: ~ 30'- . Renoo: . S~rce of Legal: &&WAaweg/-el~
.
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statemant)
.
, Propsrty SI=e: Frontaga: Feet on:
~
~ i'otal amount of adjoining land cqntrolled by thia owner or spansor:
f+
Street Address of the Property:
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, whet is your 3
interest in it?
+
. ~
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: ~
~
~
0
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED•
1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this y
proposai warrantedl . ,
~
,
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassificaticn have on the adjacent
properties7 '
~
~
R ev 2/3/81 ~
~ G
~
Numbrc xo
SPOKAN E COUHTY BdG INB68
PQEi.IMINABY CON SULTATION
- - ~
w
~ A. Pruject Name : P,,.z "t`a MF 5 ~
eROPOSAI. Numbe r of Pa rcel s: L+
Section iL T. 2 91_N., 1t. a"B.W.,M.; Quacter 03 4
DB9BLOPSB Nawe : C %&MbT%TWL1
os Address. ~
t
~AGBDIT Phone : Bueiness IZ.Z. - Z-a.O~ Home
T
M~ h Name : ~
oum Addreas:_
~
Phone: Bueinese _ Nome
~
. ~ ~ Name : ~
BWGINSSB Addrees : ' n
Phoae: Bueinese ~e
B. PRBLIMIlSABY QONSQLTATION: Date: 2d/ By:
~wow
r,,F y Prellmlpary a) Rigtit-of-Way e?/ ,y3
'Qoaditions b) Curb 4
c ) SideWelk
d ) Pave
e) APProaches
. ~
f ) Drainage
g) State/City Review Yee
~p BW(
Lr L + ~ZNfi • Y
z 1
~ t ~~i' ' • i
r
~i4~E: Ttiis ptopoe$1 ~auet cocaply with Spolsaae County Regulatioae foc Roader A=
~
pYoscb attd Drainsge in New CoQetruetion; Board of County Commteeioners Beeolutioo f~
80~1592 ae ameflded. Conditione are preliminsry aad mey cheQge after field ia-
epectioa aad reviea of County recorde.
ic , r^S
~ C• a ~SIC?~O~ Dete : By:
~ Bemarke:
l . Y A
• ~f
1
t •
D • Sp'SiCIFIC COAIDITI4N8:
.
,
Fee f'aid : Yee No Amouat Caeh Check
PlanninB AP!lication SiEned: Date J7* ~ / -J~ BY: ~
I
E. FIUL PLAT CbBCxS► ~
Fee Paid: Date Amount Check Cash ,
Matheanatical b Sucveying Checks:
No. 1 Da t e By . , No. 2 _ Uate 8y
Na. 3 _Dat e ey
Addit innal mathEmat ical and Stirveying Checks:
No. 4 Da t e By Fee Am t. b Ut . Nd .
No. S Date Hy Fee Am[.bUt.t'd.
No. 6 _ Ua C e !3y F ee .Amt. b pt .!'d . ,p .
No. 7 _ ba Ce liy ± Fee Amt.bUl.Nd.
1 ~til
~ & APPLICATION FQi2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION--continued-2
-Ahis section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with ~
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
, agencies identifled. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorpoPat- ,s
~ ed In the proposai before final submittal to the Planning Department. ~
,
1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposai. Our l
► requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied, 1
~ ,
S gnatu (Date) ~
~
° 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
~ A preliminary consuitatiotl has been held to discuss the proposal. Oyr , requjrements for subrtlittal of this proposal for re=+on hav been setlsfied.~ ~
e designated wa purveyor for this site is
,
. . ~ • ' S re) Z Date)
~ 0 % ^ A ~ at
3. W ER PURVEYOR SNAMEa
~
a) The propasal (isl (ts rtot) Iocated within the boundary of our servlce
t area.
~ s
,
b) Satisfactory arrangemnnts Shaval (have not) been mad• to serve th1s '
proposal . '
c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this sltm yrith ad ue water. eV
R~
r ,~t~f.s~ 7~'~' • , ~
i , i a ~aats~ ~ ~ 0,~ ~:,7 ~
~ 4. BU NG AND SA , DIEPARTM, ENT ,
r
i~. A preltminary consuttation has been held to discus8 the proposal. Our ~
S nqufranents for subm;ttal of this proQasal for rezon• have 6een aatistied. '
f This propma! is latated In Fire Distrl+ct ~ .
i ` ~
a F
4 tSignaturej Z~ets~ _ ~
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
l
A preliminary consultatjon has been held to discuss the proposal. The
appticant has been informed op our requireinents and stsndsrds.
(Signature) (Dats)
I, THE UNOERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER TNE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT i'HE ABOVE RESPON$ES ARE MAOE TRUTHFULLY ANO TO THE BEST OF AAY KNOW- ,
LEDGE.
t FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 Ai1A TME OWNER OF RECORO OF TME SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF N4T THE OWNER, ATTACH90
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SA10 OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HfS OR HER 6EHAl.F.
(Signed ) Date: ,
( Add ress ) Phone:
r Zip:
NOTARY Date:
iVOTARY SEAL •
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
Date:
Rev 2/3/81
~
a
,
~
.
,r
,
~
~
, r
Aq~
CE1~''~ ~ oQita~s $ ~
RF C~ `s ~
R~e~,►e ~ x
~ p► j. g' ~j t t
~k FQ~ ~t0~ P!►~ ~`R~ ~ S l ~ ~ ' ~
ptC~~ tJ►~ ~
} t v~
1 a~p~ ~,y_..•- , Q u _ f ~ g ~ ~ r
ll
~ l~ S 3
CROSS'f 19
~
(60 el µE oa. '
~ a r~~ j5117
8PaKAPS' .OA
R~e~ . P
Y„ PN -to Q 4C
~ ~t ~ ~ 1 Op~ WE~+ ~ •
r
s ~ ~~~a •
a ~ 3qq
?
S004
5
' ~~*QO t• 8~ .
~
~
4
1
r
~
~
~
! l
!
ROX0 .~t
~ M
N
~ ~NAL o
R
.
da M . • t a
ow
000
~ ~ o o S~j
x ~
1~~ ~V► ~p ~ ~ A A r • f~
»
i M
o
~o-
j1
i
ptttLw
M
.
q~
1 3 „ ~ ~ w . ER ~
Ap & r~aK 2 03
~
b
p0
48
Q ` • ~ ~ E 9466
42
•
40 r r
0
~ a t a0po ~ -
3Q P N~~ -
'32 ~
1►!I l~' 3k 1 , ~ f ESt R4 N AO
aEES
. ~
~`r ~ • E~ tit' 0 I
~ ~ ~ '~l MtAA ~~~j
V ,
~ M'S
I A~A ~ ~~6►
Q1
n~
~ ~ ' N • 3t
a~a s ~ , ~ ao A
/ ! ~ ~ ~ r pR~ G ~
r''' - ~ ^ • ~
i -
~ • ~il~~li
4 3 j~~ 4 1~H]G 1
J t: .
E
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ BRQAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFEEt50N STREET
1 p / PHONE 486-2208 ~
~
,
-
•~bt SPOKANe, wA9MINGTON 99260
sPOMANt COYKIY COVAt MOUf[
!
Js
J uly S. 1985
~
r,a
°T0: Board of Spokane County Conanissioners ~
~
FROM:`iAWSteve P. Horobiowski , Zoning Administrator ~
~
~
SU6JECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Comnittee Actions of July 3, 1985.
~
Y
Gentlemen: 4
~
On July 3, 1985, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Commit,tee met at 9:00 A.M1., to con- ~
sider four new zone reclassification applications and one extension of tine for fi rnal devel opment pl an submi ttal for a pl anned unit devel opment. Members present
,
were: Mr. Odell, Chairman; INrs. Carstens and Mr. Williams.
1
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. f
A11 Finding$ and Order for the July 3p 1985, agenda were sfgned on July 3, 1985;
and if not appealed, these decisions will become final pn July 15, 1985. ~
~
1) MeMmamw Two-FamilY Residential (4) to Multiple Family Suburban
a - 1,
VE-70-85 # Vari ance from requi red Front Yard 5etback : Crosby Enterpri ses . I nc,. Location: Generally located ad3acent to Rockwell Avenue, approximately
90 feet west of 8est Road in Section 2-25-44.
~ .
Proposal: Four Multiple Family Resfdences -(24 Un1its)
Action: Denied Without Prejudice. (Vote: 3- 0) ~
~ The action of "Oenial Without Prejudice" ailows the applicant ~
to present a lesser density project at a later date with a new y
design for consideration by the Hearing Examiner Committee. It was felt that developmeht of the proposed six-plex structures
would be an intrusion in a single family residential area.
The Zoning Adjustor approved a Yariance to allow a 27-foot ra
Front Yard Setback, whereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance,
Section 4.07.130-(c), requires a 35-foot Front Yard Setback,
2) ZE-42w85} Agricultural 5uburban to Residential Office: Hume '
Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Mission Avenue
and Vercler Road in Section 15-25-44.
~
Proposal: ExistingUalley General Hospital, Medical Office 6uildings,
and Care Units or Apartments.
1
Action: Approval. (Vo'te: 3 - 0) (continued)
~ J •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
YARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
SPOKANE COUNTY
NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
Thi s matter havi ng come before the Zoni ng Heari ng Exami ner Cononl ttee on
J uly 3, 1985, and the members of the Comni ttee present bei ng Ron Odel l,
Chai rman, Kathl,een M. Carstens and Jerry Wi 11 i ams.
B. PROPOSAI.
The sponsor, Crosby Enterprises, Inc., 1s requesting approval of ione
recl assi ficati on, Fi 1 e No. ZE-61-85, Two-Fami 1y Resi denti al (R-2) to
Mul ti p1 e Fami 1y Suburban, for the purpose of devel opi ng four 1 ots i nto
si x-pl ex structures w1 th 24-uni ts total ; and a request far approval of a
Variance, VE-70-85, to allow a 27-foot Front Yard Setback, whereas the
Spokane County Zoni ng Ordi nance, Secti on 4.07.130- ( c), requi res a 35-foot
Front Yard Setback. C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the exi sti ng 1 and use i n the area i s oresi denti al , cortmercial,
animal keeping and undeveloped.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates th9s area as appropriate for
Major Concnercial and Urban dedelopment.
3. That the exi sti ng zoning of the property descri bed 1 n the appl i cati on
i s Two-Fami 1 y Resi denti a1 ( R-2
4. That the provi si ons of RCMI 43.21 C tThe State Env1 ronmental Po1 icy
Acty have been complied with, and the Conmittee concurs wlth the
Determination of Non-Significance.
5. That the proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti seaent of the Agenda
Item have been ful,fi l l ed.
6. That the oamers of ad,jacent lands expressed disapproval of the
proposed use.
•
~1 s •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
YARIANCE N0. VE-70-85
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued)
7. The fo11 owi ng are addi ti onal f i ndi ngs of fact consi dered by the
Heari ng Exami ner Canmi ttee:
a) That the submi tted si te pl an has a mul ti tude of desi gn probl ems;
i, e. . the percent of si'te coverage, road a1 i gnment, densi ty,
sewage, and bullding height that have not been adequately
addressed at this tlme by the applicant. - b) That the proposed densl ty of 17. 86-Uni ts per acre appears to be,
too great for the area and i s not compati bl e wi th the adjacent
si ngl e fami 1y resl dences.
c) Devel opment of the proposed si x-pl ez structures woul d be an
i ntrusl on i n a si ngl e fami 1 y resi denti al area.
d) That the action of pDenial Without Prejudice" allows the
appl icant to present a 1 esser densi ty project at a 1 ater date
wi th a new desi gn for consi derati on by the Neari ng Exam1 ner
Comai ttee.
e) That the area has a predomi nance of si ngl e falai ly resi denti al
and smal l agricul tural uses;,but because of i ts 1 ocati on to
Trent and the Urban category wi th Major Comerci al al ong Trent, ~
soae change wi11 occur in the future.
E. ORDER
,
The Hearing Examiner Conmittee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the appl icati on of CROSBY ENTERPRISES, INC., for a zone recl assl ftcati on
as described in the applicatlon should be DENIED WITHOUT,PREJUDICE.
Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams
Yote: Carstens - qye
Wi 11 i ams - Aye
Odell - qye
Unanimous to DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE 3- 0)
2
~r •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-61-85
YARIANCE N0. VE-70-$5
D. ORDER (conti nued)
HEARING EXAMINER CONMITTEE,-
AERE E ABOVE
~1 I NGS, WORDER9 D VOTE
a an -
~
.
ATTEST:
For diALLIS D. HUBBARO
Pl anni Oi rector
, ~ w
y E E . 6 ~i~I Zoni ng Admi ni strator
I Date:
-
Note: See Zoni ng Rdjust4r Deci siTon wi thi n Fi 1 e No. YE-70=85.
3
,
_
1
.
_ _ -
_ _ _
J
-
- - - - -
"
~s
,r ~ .
. a 4.
aQ a 4
}
1 I ~ ~
r
~ . .w
t
I
4