ZE-35-87
L~SLEY AvE
`'~E~
q 125 ~26
{L~ rrA 0 .r
20 , ~
tt
_ ~ ark
` ~ 1 ~ ~ .
4 ~ s~ L~ tl►p b'!t Q
; ^
,
. ,
R1y~R • , c~
AV gAIOGE
~ d. AV E pla^
-
.
. ' ~ •
~ ~
,
~
[R R~r~~ / ~
.
E fioll-
s 1 ~
E•UG~~
: • ; '
~
. ~ . ~ G
E. (X
~
•
G MppIET"i A 0►VE ~
M~ ~ ' ~ Y1
i ~
~
~4t -z ' ! ' '
~L~~►E d ~ d,. ' _
0~
~y~
.
t • I ~ • ' ~ / 000
C) s"'`~ 1
yi Sc ~ k-
~~~'s- r'.•~+~ `r~'ry
j~ E • 35 ~
_ ,,~,,,r,,r ...w Z
7
r
A,
. s .~.sr! f•
s ~~1~ d I ~
~
• t
s : _ _ _ -
1 ~
~ T
~
~ . ^ . S~' ~ y r~/ d,.
+
. J ' p
o ~
0
?L / ' ~ ~...►s ~ s
it
~ Cb ~AWL-
L ~
l"
.
is
~ . ~ .W,.
~c • . ~a ,,,Y ~
~
~ ~ .
. ~
, . ~
_ I EA~
1
~
~L' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
' BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFEASON STREET
` t
i ! t
PHONE 456-2205
~ • 0 j jl .
SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260
,
SPOnwnC COUnTv COUpT HOUSC
P L A N N I N G REPORT
Date: SEPTEMBER 3, 1987
T0: SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
SUBJECT: Rezone #ZE-35-87; AGRICULTURAI to LIGNT INDUSTRIAL (I-2) ZONE
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
~A plicant: JOSEPH SCNWEHR
~wner: Fianne R. Schwehr
Proposal:
A request to rezone an approximate 41,000 square foot site from
Agricultural to Light Industrial (I-2) Zone for the purpose of
developing a contractor's office and storage.
Location:
7he site is generally located north of and adjacent to Empire Way
approximately 125 feet east of the intersection of Empire Way and Pit
Street in Section 4-25-44. Tax Parcel Number: 04544-0104. Street
Address: E. 11915 Empire Way.
II. SITE ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan:
URBAN Category
- Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary
- Inside Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary
- Inside Urban Impact Area (UTA) Boundary
The Urban category is primarily a land use designation appropriate for
residential development with some limited neighborhood comnercial and
light industrial uses. Major Comnercial and Heavy Industrial uses are
specifically identified as incompatible uses in the Urban category. Light
nonresidential uses are encouraged'to locate adjacent to arterials in
those areas that have site-specific characteristics supporting the
proposed use. Review of specific proposals should consider the
development's impact on adjacent properties as well as measures to
mitigate those impacts; such as buffering, landscaping, orientation of
activity, circulation and access. a I
r
Zon i nq :
Existing on SITE: AGRICULTURAL (established 1942) and
within: '
Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone
To the NORTH: Manufacturing (established 1956) -
P1 i n i ng ( estab 1 i shed 1956)
To the SOUTH: Agricultural (established 1942)
To the EAST: Agricultural (established 1942)
Manufacturing (established 1956)
Restricted Industrial (established 1956)
To the WEST: Restricted Industrial (established 1979)
Land Use:
Existing on SITE: House, storage and open area
To the NORTH: Industrial, railroad tracks and open area
To the SOUTH: Kingdom Hall, single family residential, and open
area
To the EAST: Single family residential, industrial and open
area
To the WEST: Single family residential, manufactured home, and
open area
Properties imnediately adjacent to the site on the southeast and west
are generally in single family residential use or open area. Lots
along the south side of Empire Way generally consist of the open area
back yards of double-fronting lots which have single family
residences oriented toward Portland Avenue. Land irrmediately to the
north, northeast and easterly of the site was zoned in 1956 under an
area-wide rezoning to three basic industrial type zones; Restricted
Industrial, Manuf acturing, and Mining. The land in those areas has
generally developed for industrial and warehousing uses. An
approximate two-acre site imrnediately west of the current proposal
was zoned to Restricted Industrial in 1979 for the specific purpose
of warehouse and storage development. To date that property on the
west has not developed. With few exceptions, the majority of the
land in this area was zoned and developed prior to adoption of the
Spokane County Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Site Characteristics:
Site Size: Approximately 41,000 square feet Existing Buildings: One
Topography: Flat Vegetation: Residential
Agricultural Summary: Urban category is not intended for
agricultural protection.
Adjoining Streets: Empire Way to the south of the site is a 40 foot
County right of way improved with two paved
lanes. It is designated as a future collector
arterial within the Transportation Section of the
Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
3 CQ.
Proposed Site Plan:
Use: Contractor's Office and Storage
Proposed Buildings: Existing to be used as office
PROPOSED REQUIRED
Parking: 5 ~
Site Plan Considerations: The proposed site plan indicates retention
of the existing house for conversion to a contractor's office.
Existing residential landscaping, immediately south of the house,
will be retained. Parking area for five (5) cars and two (2) gated
twenty-foot driveways would be added within the front portion of the
property. The remaining northerly part of the property, that area
approximately 70 feet north of the Empire Way property line, would be
used for open storage of contractor's material and equipment. The
site plan indicates existing and proposed fencing to enclose the open
storage area; five foot fence on the east property 1 ine, four foot
fence on the west property line and a six foot adjacent to the
house. A five foot setback for the open storage is indicated along
the north property line. However, that same setback is required but
not indicated on the site plan along the east property line. The
proposed site plan does not indicate provision of landscaping as
required by the Spokane County Zoning Code; particularly along the
easterly and southerly (adjacent to Empire Way) property lines.
However, adequate room is available to accomodate the required
landscaping.
note:
- The site plan submitted for review by the Zoning Hearing
Examiner Cortmittee is general in nature. Detailed review to
determine compliance with all Ordinance regulations and
conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and
to occur at the Building Permit stage.
III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Design: The proposal is to.convert an existing residential use and lot
to a contractor's office and open storage area. Conversion of the house
to office space is fairly straight forward. The conversion of the open
area to outdoor storage of equipment and materials will require
conformance to Zoning Code requirements for screening and setbacks. The
Zoning Code requires that the outdoor storage be completely screened,
from a level view, by a site-obscuring fence at least six feet in
height. The screening requirement may be waived along the site's
westerly property line adjacent to the existing Restricted Industrial
Zone, if agreed to by that adjoining property owner. The screening
requirement however will apply to all other boundaries of the storage
area. The Zoning Code specifically requires that outdoor storage
maintain a setback from property lines common to residentially zoned
property. This will require a five foot outdoor storage setback from
the north property line and from the east property line.
~3
f
III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (continued)
Bufferinq/Landscaping: The Spokane County Zoning Code requires a
landscape buffer along the east property line and along the south
property line comnon to Empire Way. Along the easterly property line a
minimum twenty foot wide landscape strip consisting of Type I
landscaping is required. The Type I landscape requirement can be
accomplished in as little as a five foot area. The five feet of Type I
landscaping could coincide with the required five foot setback in this
area. The remaining fifteen feet of the twenty foot landscape strip
could be maintained in minimal landscape cover and utilized as driveway
access only. However, storage would not be allowed within the twenty
foot area.
The intent of the landscaping requirements along the Empire Way frontage
may already be substantially met by the existing residential landscaping
there now. Required would be a minimum five foot wide Type III
landscaping strip along the property line common with Empire Way. The
addition of some plant material between the proposed parking lot and
Empire Way should serve to meet the intent of the landscape provisions
along public streets.
Po naq~e: The Light Industrial (I-2) Zone allows up to a forty square
t detached sign to a maximum height of twenty feet.
Circulation/Access: The Spokane County Engineer will require an
additional ten feet of roadway dedication along the site's frontage on
Empire Way. Required improvements to Empire Way may be deferred to a
Road Improvement District (RID) provided the applicant sign a statement
to that effect. With development of the project the Engineers will
require the applicant to develop a paved and delineated approach to
Empire Way.
The Zoning Code requires that the parking area and driveways be
maintained in hard surf acing. Nowever, there is no such requirement for
the open storage area.
Sewa~qe Dis osal: Both the Spokane County Health District and the
tpocne ~ounty Utilities Department can authorize the use of on-site
sewage disposal systems subject to the applicant agreeing to participate
in a Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) for an area-wide sewage
system. It should be noted that, pursuant to new Spokane County
procedures, the applicant has already signed and agreed to participate
in such a ULID as a requirement for submitting a reione request. That
signed document will be filed of record if this proposed rezone is
approved. _
Critical Materials/Use Activitx: This development will be reviewed, at
the building permit stage, for use of any critical materials. If found
to use critical materials, the project must provide spill containment
control measures for those critical materials.
IV. SENA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was
reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered
the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County
ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions
of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County
policies and guidelines. The Zoning Administrator has determined
that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of
Non-S ign i f i cance ("DNS"
The "DNS" was circulated to eight other agencies of jurisdiction and
other agencies/departments affected by the future development for
review and corrment. The "DNS" comnent period ends September Z, 1987,
and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the
newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of
the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site.
The Hearing Examiner Committee may consider additional environmental
related testimony and the "DNS" at the public hearing.
V. PLANNING SUMPIARY
Approval of both the requested rezone from Agricultural to Light
Industrial (I-2) Zone, and the use is supported by the following
f acts :
a) The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan provides
opportunities for development of a variety of land uses;
including 1 ight industrial. The location of such industrial
uses is subject to proximity of arterial access, site-specific
considerations, and provision of adequate buffering to adjacent
residential uses.
b) Access to the site is proposed from Empire Way which is a
designated collector arterial in the Spokane County
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Access from an arterial is a
Comprehensive Plan criteria for siting nonresidential uses in an
Urban category.
c) This area has an established precedent for industrial rezones
and developments to the north, east and west of the proposal.
While most of these developments predate adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan, their existance indicates a virtually
non-reversable trend to industrial development for this area.
d) The proposed Light Industrial (I-2) Zone, when coupled with the
specific proposed use of a contractor's office and storage yard,
provides the light industrial use envisioned by the
Comprehensive Plan's Urban category.
e) The Spokane County Zoning Code's standards for development of a
Light Industrial (I-2) Zone should provide adequate protection
to adjacent residential properties. These standards include
requirements for screening, setbacks, landscape buffers, and
signage controls. The submitted site plan will need to be
mod if i ed to prov i de conp 1 i ance wi th some of those standard s.
35
VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
1. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Comnittee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE
COUNTY. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
2. All current standards of the Light Industrial (I-2) Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site.
3. That the project is subject to Section 7.06, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE
COUNTY, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
4. AQplicant shall comply with '208' reconmendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
5. Any division of land for the purpose of sa1e, lease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits.
SPECIAL:
6. That development of this property for outdoor storage must be
consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code Section 6.32.355
- Storage Standards which requires fencing and screening of
storage areas.
7. That development of the site for outdoor storage area must be
consistent with the setback requirements of the Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 6.32.325.
8. That landscaping adjacent to the easterly property line and the
southerly property line (conmon to Empire Way) shall be
consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code Section 8.02.240
- Landsca ing Requirements for Parkin Areas, and Section
8.Z6.040 - Locat i on of`-tequ i re~l.andscap i nq.
~ ~
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As
Proposed:
STANDARD :
1. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans.
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project or any portion thereof, if the
development is to be phased.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
.
4. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Comnissioners'
Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
7. The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access
permits are required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
SPECIAL:
8. Applicant shall dedicate ten feet on Empire Way for right of way.
9. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in
and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution
which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District
(RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended.
Spokane County will' not participate in the cost of these
improvenients.
37
VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (continued)
b) CUUNIY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
10. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements
stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the
County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein
by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CkP) to
the extent of the required improvenient. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these iriprovements.
11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section
Number One, Collector Street standard for the improvement of
Empire Way which is adjacent to the proposed development. This
wi 11 require the addition of approximately 10 to 12 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
12. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated
approach(es) to meet the existing pavement on Empire Way.
13. Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the
Public #6 which specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method
pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the
owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of
a ballot, the formation of a RIO by the resolution method
pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the
owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or
resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the
owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed
RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RIO by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost
and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property
within the proposed RIO is sufficiently developed. Provided,
further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s)
on the property as a result of the improvements called for in
conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
c) CUUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioried and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
90
!
~
VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (continued)
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued)
2. The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULIO by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall nvt prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) f rom
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvenients called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36,94. 3. Any water servlce for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
STANOARD:
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Dlrector of
Utilities, Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regianal Engineer (Spokane), State Oepartment of
Social and Health Services.
4. Oisposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
5. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage
disposal system may be authorized.
e) COUNTY BUILDING ANO SAFETY DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
l. The site is located in Fire District #1.
- 2. The applicant shall provide verlficativn from the Fire District
to the Department of Building and Safety that provisions have
been made for adequate fire protection prior to the release of
building permits.
39
. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (continued)
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT (continued)
SPECIAL:
3. The Department of Building and Safety will require the applicant
to identify critical materials and submit design requirements
for the containment prior to the issuance of a building permit.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
la Water Purveyor is Irvin Water District #6, and they will supply
the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation
uses. °
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not
limited to the following:
STANDARD:
lo Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
. construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
4. Demolition and renovation projects must comply with the
requirements of CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart M. Intent to Demolish
and Renovate forms are available at the SCAPCA office.
SPECIAL:
5. Al1 travelled surf aces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean. Storage areas may require
appl ication of a dust pal 1 iative.
1
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMh1ITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Zoning Nearing Examiner Comnittee on
September 3, 1987, and the members of the Committee present being Phillip
D. Narris, Chairman, and Gary N. Anderberg and John W. Skadan.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor,Joseph Schwehr, is requesting approval of a zone
reclassification, File No. ZE-35-87, for the purpose of developing a
contractor's office and storage.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is single family residential,
manufactured home, Kingdom Hall, industrial, railroad tracks, and
open area.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
URBAN development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application
is Agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy
Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the
Determination of Non-Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda
Item have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or
uses within the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and
accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the
area.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands and/or their representatives
expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use.
10. The Nearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
~
~I
11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the
Hearing Examiner Committee:
a) The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan provides
oppportunities for development of a variety of land uses;
including 1 ight industrial. The location of such industrial
uses is subject to proximity of arterial access, site-specific
considerations, and provision of adequate buffering to adjacent
residential uses.
b) Access to the site is proposed from Empire Way which is a
designated collector arterial in the Spokane County
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Access from an arterial is a
Comprehensive Plan criteria for siting nonresidential uses in an
Urban category.
c) This area has an established precedent for industrial rezones
and developments to the north, east and west of the proposal.
While most of these developments predate adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan, their existance indicates a virtually
non-reversable trend to industrial development for this area.
d) The proposed Light Industrial (I-2) Zone, when coupled with the
specific proposed use of a contractor's office and storage yard,
provides the light industrial use envisioned by the
Comprehensive Plan's Urban category.
e) The Spokane County Zoning Code's standards for development of a
Light Industrial (I-2) Zone should provide adequate protection
to adjacent residential properties. These standards include
requirements for screening, setbacks, landscape buffers, and
signage controls. The submitted site plan will need to be
modified to provide compliance with some of those standards.
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO TNIS APPROVAL
(All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Comnittee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
l. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Comnittee. Yariations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
wi 11 be permitted, including, but not 1 imited to the fol lowing
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE
COUNTY. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
2. All current standards of the Light Industrial (I-2) Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site.
3. That the project is subject to Section 7.06, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE
COUNTY, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
4. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
5. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits.
SPECIAL:
,
6. That development of this pro3ect for outdoor storage must be
consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code Section 6.32.355
- Storage Standards which requires fencing and screening of
storage areas.
, .
a) COUNTY PLANN I NG DE PARTMENT ( cont i nued )
7. That development of the site for outdoor storage area must be
consistent with the setback requirements of the Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 6.32.325.
8. That landscaping adjacent to the easterly property line and the
southerly property line (common to Empire Way) shall be
consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code Section 8.02.240
- Landscaping Requirements for Parking Areas, and Section
8.06.040 - Location of Required Landscaping.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As
Proposed :
STANDARD:
1. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans.
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Nealth District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
p 1 an for the ent i re pro ject or any port i on thereof, if the
development is to be phased.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'
Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
7. The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access
permi ts are requ i red pri o,r to the i ssuance of a bu i ld ing permi t.
a ~
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
SPECIAL:
8. Appl icant shal 1 dedicate ten feet on Empire Way for right of way.
9. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a
wi 11 ing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose
is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said
improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County
wi 11 not participate in the cost of these improvements.
10. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement
stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the
County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements by joining and
participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of
the required road improvement. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements.
11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section
Number One, Collector Street standard for the improvement of
Empire Way which is adjacent to the proposed development. This
wi 11 require the addition of approximately 10 to 12 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
12. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access
approach(es) to meet the existing pavement on Empire Way.
13. Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the
Publ ic #6 which specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method
pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the
owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of
a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method
pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the
owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or
resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the
owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed
RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost
and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property
within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided,
further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s)
on the property as a result of the improvements called for in
conjunction with the form4tion of a RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
.
o • -
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
l. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
2. The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
d) COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT
STANDARO:
l. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social and Health Services.
4. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
5. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Nealth Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage
disposal systemmay be authorized.
.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
STANDARD:
l. The site is located in Fire District #l.
2. The applicant shall provide verification from the Fire District
to the Department of Building and Safety that provisions have
been made f or adequate fire protection prior to the release of
building permits.
SPECIAL:
3. The Department of Building and Safety will require the applicant
to identify critical materials and submit design requirements
for the containment prior to the issuance of a building permit.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Irwin Water District #6, and they will supply
the s i te wi th adequate water for domest i c, f i re and i rr i gat i on
uses.
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not
limited to the following:
STANDARD:
l. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or
suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from
all other construction related activities.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
imnediately to clean these surfaces.
3. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the
construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using
the site following completion of the project and from occupants
of the proposed project.
4. Demolition and renovation projects must comply with the
requirements of CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart M. Intent to Demolish
and Renovate forms are available at the SCAPCA office.
•
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
SPECIAL:
5. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
ORDER
The Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned,
finds that the application of Joseph Schwehr for a zone reclassification
as described in the application should be APPROVED.
Motion by: Gary N. Anderberg Seconded by: John W. Skadan
Vote: UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE (3-0) TO APPROVE
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE
FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
~r-
airman '
,
ATTEST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
. / w
y
Zoning Administrator
Date :
,
~
'
SF'OF`ANE COUNTY ENG I NEER I NG DEF'ARTMENT
,
D P_ ta t !
T o: 'S ) p J~ cY I'1 e Co l_i rl t jJ F' i I'7 1 0"1 g 1) E? r1 c`+ r f(1 C' n L
i~ ?'I ~ c;1.:1 Cl ~ .F+ i"1 e COLl f It}/ l.=. ng3 i i ak..' r'a
_lls , t='C~ o lr~.=-Id ] ~ ti=)11t= C:iF f i~.7p1" ~ fi_EC~~ C.r" ~~~--~=!-~7----,--------_..._.~__--__
~aI ~p ~{~t~wL~r-+i~,_____________
S E:f. 3. C?I-I 4~ ~ ) C71rdE-,':;hl}J No Ran~~'= _ 'T~
Th~-? fC? Li. oL+} 1n+ a tDt ArJo1'' ovct 1" fr? i ? I} t-:-, ~.'AbL Jvr:~ rFti f% r*' i I[ ei L? I I f?
c-anc~e a rr- auL.ff) I ±L ec.i fi.o ttitp Srn~<<nc-_, Cour-)" v L.Glii t~~ - p- I ,r
r- ~ r~ r- r r ♦ ~ r ~
1 i i~~ Lt ~-a 1 r~ f i A t 1 i"'~. ,:'t (1 ' i L f 1 li I" ~ C? C] f t_i 1 r_~ i 1=~ ~ f~i`i~r ~_r 7~I,l~ ccl er t~;l ~ ~ . i~~ 1~' ~ f t~'1 f? 1.1 ItIjiC
ri c- a r lrcj s, c h e vul.1-i-efi C=F'T=--~~-------__9
Prior tc3 the release of a building permit or Ltse of the property as
proposed:
~-~p p l I ca n t :h<-_ 11 d Pu3 c: t e TEM4 e eL cir, ~1L_-- N' F'bF'r---_W A -i C! r ~ 1 q h~
c, ~ w~Ayd
1 C i f~ ~L =~'3 j, . SL! b ffl 1 t f i 1 f ~=t ~7 1~ C:J V:l 1 C~ O~ cl r"i e C i i I l n t VE r-i cr1 t=a iD 1"
~ f' C) l_r , i~' -i l fl ct g c; %_i c C.. E-:' =a :1 p ! ci i i .
Thc? G,pp 1 xc-~7int sha I3 FLtbmj f o^ aRp! ~=~~•~~I b;: the Spo6 zine Countv E+'-_~1r
ii T-i d * 1-2 i? Sj p fro f s? Cl C r l_t fl 1'1 a I Eh il ] ~t r t r-- cyt d ES L a 1 ie- G Coi TE b 1 f i F? d C~ 1 i"' C'i 7. k L? L b:' w ty cl
r~ y/ E, t e fit p ~:=t Ir- ra i-i C: s-:,1 l f 4v c4-te1'` ci ? G5`,cf`-~ a 1 p I c"1 fl f oT' tf'1 e e n f Z r e U I` O]R-c:f i`. t'
i j a 1- 1 r_, 1 -1 ~ I-1 c~ r ro 3. ft h e ci e v F, i c-) r) m e, r, t L S p h e- c t .
I(}n A pari Lr-i, r ) ,Rn ~.~n(J ±^af f lc ~1 p«1 lDtior, F, Ian sNali be :3.ubmJ ~t C-o =„rrl
<ipj.:lf`=)`JeJ 13y Zii.a o I rq fiin f'.C)Ltii~'_`v ~flC).lll(;i'I' e ! 4'"IC? f=eE?i1.CiT"It i..t~ ctilCi
i' f' a Ci g E' fil t"' i l ~ C-) f i.:, e t(' I- 3 f't C.J ii ta JI_= f'1 c'1 4I b e 1 n ~ C C: v^ ia c`t n c: F? t: 1 f.. {'l s L af't d a r CJ
t=' fl g, 3n f? c ? i, g p f` c.t L= 3 1c E"~ s , Pzi J:c i'i g c. f' S) Ll T` Y<:l c i. tl rJ a p l7 rj'b` i? d I.7 'J i i i_" C t~~ L..1(l t
Ennin epr W 1~~ bp- et"( l.l 1! ed fof` af ly p0 rtiq f t C1 { fi il e pr 0)eCt whl e.:. f't l a T_ E'
occt_tpaed oi, tr z\r E-ied hy vehic1~=s
11. Tr. C t7 i 1 Str1_l C-'t. -'he ^ t7 c-ClW ci y 1 mp(' C) V P!i 1 et-1 ~'i. C: stct t 2 d fl F3 C` E? 1(1 , the zipjJ .'i. ) C cct C 1t.
rnav, wtth t{-~e appi•ovai of thin C-n+_tnLv Encltneer, JoLn Zri and bc wa ].ling 'k-o
particzpt-tte in c-;nv petition cr5 rr-;c)1Litic3n whtch pLtrpose is the forrnatio,-r
of r--. Road I m provemenhD.1,U-a c t (FZTD) fcjr _S.-ILd IMPr Ov C-Im FN-0- pUr-S=.l ant. t o
W6 .271~.'~. y c`t s i.a ii %,c-fl fj L-' i le ..°r'.1 ~'J C3 Ic(I t P- C(:7 l..l C'i t y Will fl t7 t G ai-1i.. 1:.: 1 pate 3. n th? C CJ st
the-_;e l fil pt" ovr? mt=' i'i - s.
~"'e 4s ai~ ~;l~.FrrIP,t ~.Ye metlioci of ccrtstr~e~Ctinc~ the rciad xrfiprv~ements :~~c_~ted
h~..=re a.n 4 t h e r:►f: F 1 t:--~=zn t r-,iay,, w E j_f'r ; I-r~ a p E:,r av t i iI f t 1-i E7 Ca t_t nt yE ng I ne e, i, n
accomp lj ah the r r,--td ymp rovements, statnd 1hrH, P arr ttiy 3 o znzng and
F) w;rt ~t ir.:z± Zng ln ~..-i 1-_ nin - L ;r R ot--i d F'r c,) nc:t lCf=P) t_0 t h e cr;i_e ni_ cf-. e
r• rq Li i r e cJ i mp r o v Q iTi F n t. ~ p a r a n k? C 0 c. t rr t y w 1 11 n n f.. pa r t- c i pa t e 1 n t h C-7 c ~ t 0 f
I _he sc e i m p r o v e i n ei- i t s.
I TI-in cc.,n=t rLic: t;.on of the ro,--tciwa}• 1 mp r 4vement slt~-_iteci h~~E- i r-r sha 11 Lac
a=_-c_comp] iGncd aa -,PG ^oved by ZhE '_:,pr~E AnC= Cul_tn t-v E n g i n e e r .
1
~
1~ n Tt~~~ C:~ur~ t Y ~nL~ l ne~r t~~.s c:}psi cln,t r-r~ T~.~~~ ic~.t.i hic~~~c~way Sect 7. ~~fl h~lsrr~~,c~ r~
ONE~_ ~011 .-1--E L,T01"_ci TI-;FFT_sncla rd f c-:r t I7c-, ri rp r ~v~.~m:3n L c) f_r-- M F'iR E_WA Y_ whi -.-h
L ---t d ~aC: t:? i"! t `Lr:J i 1 C c^^ p i` opC.i sf? d {'j a' V F? I C7 pt T,~-:.17 t. 1 r I W I1 1 i' F? Gl ! i 1 1' C-- the aij d i~ i L7 n
cif aFprc:,:. 31T,,Ae11V 1o_TL?12_T t a ~f asphal t~.~lc,r-Eg +_~ie t rontage of ti-ie
r9e.elopment. CLII-hxnq~anrb :~id&wal~ MUSt a1~o bF c_an,-=tru~'LE2r1.
16n r;1 1 r oqu L rer1 1 moi, ove-m(= n 1 1 con r c~, e~ rri Lc~ 1-h(--> rE? n-r_ ';LaLc~ of
W'c~-ihifiiIE C'lf', ~i1-,Andc.lC'd SpeC=i i° F_4 t Iufis 'i r►I` RC)c-c] .:(fjc1 -.C.fiCjc' 1_OfiSt iUC± ion afld
t i'i i l f=,I~ ~IP(a i. l L= <°t hl COUC1 tv andi L! f cv Z~ ~1 j'~ F_ C' f E: -=-cj.{. uL 5pE_' t~ La1 Pl 1 ng
('.a s'' t a 1 I i 1 n C'.j f f, R r'3 c--t d 3 t c.~ i lcJ c°t I' d a i l fl j.' r, r m W °t Lo r ty( z-, ri c=ti l:.) i=? f f 1 Ca i" i L 1 1` i t? if E° ty. t c\ f tI-,
dat.~.:. of r=IpprcoiC;'d I-1V T_hiC' S'ot_I('ri'_v i_ii!a1i-iF=E?i ~
i3n T ho Ct f7 p1? r_ raintstic-A1 1 c_ ol-r --a tr+_+ rt ~-a nco-z1ved and LJ a 9ilnl~, At 2d ap Fra~~c cli Es ; tri
f!l G= E~ l f? Fr~ at _ I. ~1 e.:'j ~ 1< t V t~' !Tl C~ tl i°~ 1 l i~ ~iy i-~i ~7r
C_) u hC)aijWsa,v s7, fi.-~^f}i fds,t t'vr) ►Ce<A1 I`CJc?rUJr"?:j% aet:? i(:?f"1s ..kf'Id CilI" _t] ri ~tlC:, F'iILZli
f' e L! ! E 1 1' Ee' m C' I'1 L~ a i F' f. 0, L ' n d 3 rl r7 0 ~ rt r.E' Bi 1%i f' d Cji t 0 l..l I-I t_ ~l C o (TI 1T! 1ss ] c.-j f IE- f'' s
s "'i tj ~
p C7 f f'J C ~
r - ts ~ .i l_t ~ L , J f- 1 C3 l _ 1ti.P ~ y~, » ~ I ~ (J ~t i 1 G ~ it, ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ C c . J '1 i ~
c`. T h e a n] 1 C i ~'1 ± ri ri CJ i_l 3d =i C~ 1 l_ r'1.=i ~C. l fl ~_i J\! C~ LRR 3 dr1 sewa~i aCc
('3 fa I-m1 S=7 --A f` r e C3 i= : f }c- C[ i` i~~ i' ~f D 1. '-r SI_l aI-1 C.: l~? Of
~'f.- r,P J 3cr~-ni sh~.~3 : s-,xgn Ftncl rr-C-CK r Spoll. iinE-:= COUnty i'.iu# zt_e ta the F'Lib~ac
Nt?. ~ wfl l i:_ h Lfl e # i] 1. a. t7 W t i't ! :
The Q4yner (s) nf SUL:.Cc--,.~.~"--,Qf 7.n inter~'3C7t ciC'JreE tO c-tLlt.h0T'?ze the
~Ounty r c, P:_ar,E-, i_heir ri~.amF~ or~ i~ pc-?t i r_ ii>nq Fat, the t orrnzit i rn o f a Roa,d
~ r ov~~ m~~ r~ D xsf r 3~. ( F' T D) bv t t-~ Pt1 tio r~ rr~ E1 k. r~ nd PLt rS~.I ~:c n t tc~ C h~~ pter•
R C W q ~J h.~ c I i E~ c?i t t_ y c.~ i r~ c 1~_i d~~ s f_ f~ o c~ i~ E? i, F y. ~ F a R 7D ts
f ormed '-jy Fither the peti f xon or rE-sOJ.utic,n r~~cn±^ociq as-, proyxcled fQr 2n
--i~S.,'3c-31 Rr'. W,, L I-ie fa 4q1 iei" (c-:,) C".1r sl_l C Caa sof' ls) r Lt rf i1 i' i 2 gf C? eo (t) n c L
t~~e ~.rnprc~,~~arier~± c~r cc,~~st~~t`~.~;.zon f-nrrte~~plateci wltt-~z-, ihe prnpQsed SIn y~
f r cI z-, L b ?E: . Lf7 f t!-i e b.--z-un-tics t_ o bee ci a; t vc~ d frc, m t he form aT_ a. o i-t of the
~iT 7".,~ tC, En prrr~E~rty~ a.r~c i~..~u~~d W~~E~re? tc~)nn` f~er~ wa ~r~ ~~e art,c~s:n± ~.,f t~nv
n L p c.~ r 1-- t(.: Z j.J c:t L ?(.7 fl , e:' r_ C, d w fi_ I-i u, C?'.a t_ ca I, L:.p e n :a e 41 f { Li f` maf 1 C7 n. of t hr?
PiD. anc! (7) that the propt-rtv wt-' hin thp- proaosc--d RTD IS sLtt {3czc-:?nt 3;•
dt'Vt'lopC?d. PTo\%1Cledy tUl'therq f_f"ie GLNi1;Df ra) t?i" S1..4Cce7s0(' {s) ShaA i f'E?Udtlfl
t h_ r ight, ~AS al-ithor a-zed Under RCW -_76. rae. c),qc-}~ tc:, c,b; ~ct to arFv assA'sSment
c:,ri the praper± ;r as --A re-,LlI4 C-If the improvem~=3n~s, ca] .lL-d rc,r, rn Con)urc}_-Lon
wz ! h the f ormat ic;n of tt-ie I--~'TD t,y eifi her p~titton c-ar rescalL(t a.on met hod
~..i { 1 C~ t? t` C h-ap t u-~r 6o' 38 RCW.
R I GHT OF WAY W I DTH ALONG EMF` I F:`E WAY I 5 40 FT.***
~
rf.
SF'OKANE CDUhJTY EhIG I hlEEF I NG DEF'AFTMENT
T? z-tt S-- 19-- 97
To: rPc~ COunT y F'I --,nning D~par*_mr,nt
Fr o m: ;pc~~ arr~ C--cju~ ~ ty il'-:nc~ ~ neer ' s Dep=~r• tmFnt
i I_kL.lj t.C: t_: Cc--ii:.ijtic,nt: clf s;arie Ch,~tngr 'Non =~E~735.-97
"I-aFJ i Z c c=11~1 L s i~c_~iTr~W c=ri-{°~~~i°i1i-~~---r-^---°^-------'--_--_
f~3E:~ l_ - lai I I~ y F fi0,'dl~l'~~ i~. iiti q i'l ai1~;1'_' _T'-`~-
!rC?lr. Th-:.3 alJ C-,s~t_'
t]c=1flge .:!('P :>l.ibili 1 y LC-'i..s t o thG lc3f"ik.-)~ ctfle CC-Lln t y f'iMCti J fii_j E:'c'lfTlll-lof` t.,t.:~f'iiili7 i..te!=? i Or
i f"i CI Lt s 1o f l 1 t i F_ ihi? " F-' 1 a f l i'i X i`l C.7 R j7 C? f-_ 1 Ci F i 1'1 C3 7rt (i_a I-t Ci 0 r' d t? 1` " !7 f L h i--2 ri Ll C3 1 , C:
~
Cl~ c=~(' 11i Ci s ~:.riE'l~Lf ~.~C! riE~'`-r__ :.°...~._._~._~9 ~.rt~ /
Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as
proposed:
1. Apn3. t cant shi:41 1 dPd a r:,t e __TEN_ Ireet on Iri gh'°
c r w<~yf~
R. Appl1c~.~ni shzAt ] s►_►Fmi? fnr .-tnprcava3 by j'nc,~ ane C:oi_tn~.;: E-rrc,? n,=.aer
o;-;U , dl i ilGtge c+ll(ft
=~a Thf-~ Gzpp3.3~.~ant shc~11 >~.~t~m3t t c~r apnrc~v~cJ. ~,y ; ~-~t_ Sp~t ane- C:o!cntv Ei;g-.rieer
•=t C"~ ~j 1--Fl L SpC] ~«!1 E? r ot.t nty Htj aLLf'i D1si. 1(= f'_ a C~ E? }+Y 1~ L=' ~:i c om hi. ned !7 C--' S 1te sF=' V!~ aqe
•7yWtern pl~An and Sur {<<ce water d►spos~,l p lzin t or the- cnt 1 re pi aa ect c.,r
j1or± 7 r:jr-1 Fhei-eaf if I-Lhc= dr_-vetopment_ iS phc'esP_Ci,.
I(--). a par~ irg ptan E-znd' t ^Gz~ f ~c circc.alintion p1<zn b~ SUUreiLted --A nd
<-k p F7r, o v c- d b y t_hta ~ pn! ; nc- C:~) un t_ ;r En n I n e t-4 r . Th e FEa~E, L cl ri . I c- c ~i i i r_n nC
.,EincC with Standctrci
G;rranc~pr~-i~.a~-~t of r.c,r~ ~.~-~ca st~°~] 1s ~tic~Il be ln aecrRr4
L-.'nq 117t?c:-:'I- Pr?VIng l`!f` rLlf T i~:3.flCj ca`=• :.~('~1arG\•F?d tb-y tele Ci.Ju-fl-tv
Ef-I 4 j 3 f 1 f' C-r W 1La he t' eqLl 1 I^ ed f Ur c.~ n,v pG1(` tI(.:1 n C} f ti7 f'-' pi' C' jeC i l'V hi ch 1s t. C3 Ei e
Oc CUpa. ed or f r a•,: ele:d by V f? f l l ClZ S
ii. To- constrLtCt thp rc-adway a.mprovPment= st.ated herean, the applacant
may, wi th the- apprr~vc, t of the Cot_tnLy Eng:neer,, ,.7o►n in and be wz i 1 zng to
partzcip~.~te in any petitzan or, resolc,ticn wt-iach FaUrpos-e 1s the formatzc,r-7
ca f~--, i;ra.-ArJ T mpr flvemen I D I c_t cF~ L11) 1 f 0r- S.-Et i ri ILMPr 0vc?mP-1-1+_ pLtr SL(ejr-i#. t a 13CLS
`'16. S3y as amendc~d. SPo~ ai-le CoLint•✓ w3 11 riot par-ta.c ipate in thp. cnsfof
t hc--! s e 1fi1p 1''avr?iiit~rt s .
1 12. As cZfl a ] te rn lz-tt ]ve-, f7ir til iGtj C) f !=GIIst r 1_1 Ct lfig a t"if' r C3ad Ifflp i"overrient- S SLc«a d
h c, i` P 1 fl , t he rr E) p 1 zL_ I-t 11 ' m-Ry,, w i t_ 1-r ± t-r e a p p r, i--j „E: I F!~ ~C G L' r7 tV C n g 1 n e e-., r y
<<R_co rri p i as t-i -1- he r ci ztd i mp r nvrme~ nts ata t~~d h r~re i n by j cai n in cl -cnd
particip~.~ t 1 ri g t r? <z Co:_t nty Ra---td Proioc: L (C i i F' ) i. fz) f i°i Ey L,:: LFzr~ -L of t_ ! ip-
r•(---quireei improvement.'--)pc,R ane- COUr,ty wi l 1 noL p~.~r± ieip;tE in the coat or
t heso-I tmprovemeiit-s.
j:'. TF'tie con,5i.rUC? 10ri Oi the roa-tlway a.rrpr'ove-mert-s '3tated hereirj stiall bc-
accump] icaheci ~~s approved by tt~~ ~~~iane. COurity Enga neeer 5
,
{
15a T rr e C: ount;: Ent J 1nrer has c4- si. ca nated T;: Gica1Rnadway ion NIumbor
hNE~ r011_1__e-rTOR_ ST4=irFT_5_,<°1ncJ<,- rci fr- r f he, 1m~.~r overrte-nt L-) f_EI"!F'TRc_I.JAWwhi cl-r
1==3 ~ ad ) ac af l T_ t Gj f_ 4 i C? p I" pnst? L'.{ dlC V f? L ! 7p if 1 G? n t. 1 fl 3 ri W l11 f` E? C-Il.I 1 1' e ^ i. h c- ~ ti Cj J 1L i L7 il
crf _-ipprcj:: Lm,-1_Le1V tC_1_TO1^_ft. of ~•a~h~~~. ~..~l,r;g tr►c- frontSGE2 of the
fieveloriment. CLirb1 nq~_~knd~szdewCtla rnUSA a1~o bP-c_onstrUct~.~do
a 6jo (2,11 C.-L7 ! l 1(` eC.~ 1 iTl prrJ V u-t Il r_S fl cs 4 iholl C: tJ n<cw(rf tG f_ f-le C-4..-Wi` F? i7 fi.
tlr? I- Road ci f 1 Q Bi 1 G Ca C? t: C? f i'LtU'_t C f J un c, f"i d
f)Lhf:' ~3 p(a I't cL:-~ ~(P couml. <_i i-i c-1i cii' :t u C3 FAed e=;r'? s uF?of is- }.J C: I` -~o1 i"1 inC~
F)~:' 1` t,--i1 1"1 1 f i g tC7 Rorl C~ Sta17 d,:.-i 1' d-) c-t Cl ci r 1. oI' ?t Wa*(; f' Mc i i7 c: [ yE;fri7 ei-'i L 1 ri e{ t E' Ct c.1 ~ thp-
daU2 of r' f? f 1st. rtt r" ~ioi-1 , ul iIE-.~ srs %=t pl.J ovt= dl C3 v T t Ie LE-f ig1 nF' F? i n
I 'cl . Tli L- Ok pnl1 ra 1-1 t s h -a l l cc. n ilyr•►~rj p zi Uc r_i a nc1 uc-, 31n2ak_e 0, F, p p roa c h is ; ~c,
fi'Ie e L t iie f?ls t_].Plq FJ«Ju, fn r_flt to i 1 F_ " ~ ~1=ir'~~~-._GJf~`~.
r C7 c: d w r_i ✓ _i t`~t i"1 C~ c f~~ a q C<~t Z 1' C~ c? l~ W,~ ~J C3 f_ T 1 (l s r"_, i"I (j I' r_l ] E"7 = i:~ j a 1 ~=t I i
fQ1jU1 ,'E?fFiPl-lt=; ai e i G0r'ld ] i E ::rf7c r e DlJ~_tf'd uf Goi_1nT V l._OMfT11 C-3 o['iri' s)
r c-~C_= i.f_%! lo) t E3(_)" #..~.J9~ ~<a c=rllE.'i-tdt-?(d ~}i1(.~ ell-c? ctj_=(a i. l Cct~r a i..i) i°_ t~rD c3_,L n
~ c.~ j? l1 C:~ Cl t ~s G i.A } j~ ~ i:' c+ \.r J=~ F? r~ i. f'I t 3(1 ~a 1': ] U l!:°t .°1. ~ f ~;°f t-t 4` rl C T C' S
f) 0" ( t i 11' s c.:k F=~ i uu 1 r c d ` I' l C! 1 ~c/ C_i4! ci °I C- f? r"3 i i? L7 Ll a 'i d .i i'i L- CJ G r ITi L j_ ~
~"1 { ~ 3~. c~ r~ n~~~ 3 1 si C~ i i ~7 i~ r- r L, r ~7 Fl C~ E c.~ ne C L.4 f 7 f.. v ~ J C 2 C3 ~ r'i e i'! Lb ii t:.
NC?. c~ Wh1j=fl rpfsci fiL=s the r:JlloALrIC:
i!-ie c-.4ner cs> or ~~~CC_c,<ssor t:) in 2nterest agree tc~ ~LH_hori the
C f=1 ! i I-14_ 'yf iCJ plcci cc r_ i iCeii' rz arrie(s) r1 I'i c+ pe'C. .L t] U i-1 fC! i" t. tl e f Q r - it <:i t_ 1:7 i i C7 f • t ~o <~1 u
.~mprcavemPr~i D zi ct (RII3' by tf;cn peti~tior~ r~-~e~ ~-oor! pLzrSu~~n-i fi.Q L~~apte~•
' si a v~ i~~ C~v ~ VV F~P i 1.. ~1 f'' t 0-3 4~ i 1 i i°1 ~.1_t d:? f_ ~'"t E~ o w n~ r l~ i i i~~~ i{~ L~+ ~ r 1~~
f ormeJ 'ty -2ther the oetx± io« ror reso]±it ican me7hod9 ,s T-)r(-.JvzdL-d for xn
~ ~ ~ r3
i..,11 a~ l~_~'1' ~ a n3 ~ti~... W,, R..~-1i. f:a 4VI~E.1" C)I~ L~l_1C L Ls~iO(` C. L.ti f ~"j ' ~ E? c~ C 1" C_ F : ( i t fl
±hc amprovement or crmstruc-11-trr cortempl.aieci wxthir 1-_he rrc-,pcsed RIi3 is
S 2 ~ ~ f7 i r~ o f l-1 ci t ~ j 1 f? i7 f? 1"1 C~ I h S L7 b C-? C~ r? I- i. V f? u f i° t:7 f il f i i C f C.i ( tt r_ t_ X Q i~ f i h:-F iD hV ~ fle ni`~~pt-f t,v ll-'iCl!tCJed t~'~C'f F~']:r19 'Logethef' tN7.th t-ilE c'amC!!(If l.:Jf c.`(l`•E
CJ l_l i7 Lji p ct i' t 1(._ .l. p c7 L 1 C'l f l 7 4,x C e E~ d 1i Er' C!"? ~a t_ s=l ii d l7 @ f°l • e o f f `7 f~ il C--,% L. :L L7 Cl C7 f t {-1 e
P I L~. zi nd ) fi h th e p r o p e r t v k•4 tthln the p r o oc) s ecd F:In a S S !t f f 3 L e- n4%- ].'r
CiL-- v~~~o p E?~. F'i C-, Vi a F'c-i , f u l- j I lC?!, y ~flcr? o WflF?f t--; 'J t?i'- t~~LtC.~e S-. S 0 T` tS~ {~i1A 11 r e L:_ til
f.he r ight, ~~S Z-(Ltthcr:L=e1 under F;CW ~'6. 9c':). tiyci, to c-b) ect to a nv FjaSrSsmen4.
un ihP rroper-ty ar~ a re-,uik ur M"ir imp^ove-menl_s f.-a31e-d i~_,r, in conjunr_klarl
wi-t.h the io., m;t icn of tne RID by L-ither pPt it xun or res?o3Ut iun mcathod
Linciear r:h<:_kpter 76.133 RC4n
R I GHT OF WAY W I DTH ALORlG EMF I RE WAY I S 40 FT.
ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PAGE 2
AGENDA: SEPTEMBER 3, 1987
2. ZE-32-87 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL-22 (UR-22) ZONE I
VE-70-87 OFF-STREET PARKING YARIANCE
Generafly iocated between Mission Avenue and Maxwell Avenue
approximately 75 feet west of Houk Street in Section
15-25-44.
Tax Parcel Numbers: 15542-0702
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: Medical Office Building
Variance Request: To allow development of an 11,000
square foot medical office
building with 46 off-street
parking stalls (approximately 1
stall per 240 square feet of
building area) whereas the Spokane
County Zoning Code Section
8.02.060(9) would require
approximately 55 stalls for the
proposed building (approximately 1
space per 200 square feet of
building area).
Site Size: Approximately 20,800 square feet
Applicant: Diagnostic Radiology of Spokane
and Inland Imaging Ltd. Partnership
c/o Ben Nielsen
W. 1203 Riverside
Spokane, WA 99201
NOTE: This application is for two separate actions; a zone change and a
variance. The two items will be heard concurrently by the Zoning Hearing I
Examiner Committee.
3. ZE-35-87 AGRICULTURAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ~I-2) ZONE
Genera i-ly located north of and adjacent to Empire Way
approximately 125 feet east of the intersection of Empire
Way and Pitt Street in Section 4-25-44.
Street Address: 11915 E. Empire 'Aay
Tax Parcel Number: 04544-0104
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: Contractor's Office and Storage
Site Size: Approximately 41,000 square feet
Applicant: Joseph Schwehr
Route 1, Qox 259
Chattaroy, WA 99003
E `LES LE1 AV E .
w ~ZT ~29 ~
126
'
124 %25
I~ „I• ♦
20 Q~ 1
~ i .
~ . P,Ivnte
' . ~
~ %to u~ 1 n S~ t~ t y
~.l.
,
,
AV gAiaGE
_ i
c r . ~ , . AVE ~ ' Qn ~ vion t
, C~ r'' s -Q►~L E
~ ~ .
~ ~ .
. ~ / ~
.
ti• • .
. :~i• ~
• •
~ ' ~ ,£.v"
~
• j..
.
. ~
-
~
3 ,
b
,~`~`R ~ ►
~ MAFkjET'f A AvE I
s ~ ~ ~1
W ~
.
4 Z
1p00
~~►~Ks *t ~ ~ ~
Cf OL
O~ d
` ptMMr'~ ~ ~ r
~
. ►r"G 1~ „ . ~ ~ G'~ ~ I ~ . , ~ ~ _ ~ f!~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ rse...
~ LC/ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~~f~ ~ r. ~ ~,a'~
~ P ~ ~~1 ~ ~ ~ I l
' /fr j r~ (f(f /1 ( Y P ~ f / l ~ `fY ~ / ~ r f ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~a,~~ ~
. ~
■
~ . .4 ~ . , _ ~ , . f~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~
~ ~ , ~ ~ , .
~
f,~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r • ~li , ~ .~s.r`rn ii ~A . ~ i ~
~ ~ N ~ . s. ~ r . i'
IY ~
1^ 1 ~
t ' ~ ~j~ ~
] ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~
4op ~
' ~ ~
- ~ ~
~
~ { _ . , f
~ ~ . r~'
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , r ~ , ~ c.
a~ , , ~ ~
~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , -
, ~7 ~ ~
. r'' ~ ~ ~ ~
1
~ ~ . c, ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ° I - ~ ~ i f d a . ~ . ~ ~ • ~ ~
~ R ~ i ~ ~ ` [,n
_ ~ t .'''i ~y ~ ~ , S
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,p ~ ~ ~ * A q ~ t ~ I ~
ti I'~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 ~ l,y ~ ,n ~ ~ ° ~ , .
~ ir. ~ ~r~ . ~ '~a . ~
~ ~ . ~
~ . ~ ~
• . i . " ~ 4
~ ~ ~ r
. _ ~ I`" . - R ~ . ~
~ ~ J tf ~ ~ r ~
r~ I
~ ~
~ j ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~
' - ~ r! ~ ~
, ~ ~ , h * 1i ~ / ~
; r~ ~ i ~ -
1 r ~ ~ , ~ } ;i ~ ~ ~ .s ,w ~r,~ sr~, - i..r...■
j r I~ 1~ r~1
i
~ Y ~c~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,
w
.PLANNING DEPARTMENT
' BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFfERSON STREET
PNONE 456-2205
•s , ~ t ~..i 11 i _
~ 1 V
SPpKANE WAjHItJGTON 99260
SNOnAnE COVnTY COURi nOUSt
MEt40RANDUM FCf/[/,ta
ALIG 1 1
TO : County Bui 1 di ng and Safety Department SPOKq 19$~
nF , ,
1 County Engineeri ng Department Co
County Uttl ities Departrnent ~E'ER
County Health District
FROM: Pat Frankovic, Assi stant Zoni ng Admi nistrator,6 ~
DATE: August 5, 1987
SUBJECT: September 3, 1987, Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Agenda
Attached is the information for the September 3, 1987 Zoning Hearing Examiner
Committee Agenda. Scheduled are three zone changes and one change of
conditions. Two of the zone changes are accompanied by variances. All four
actions have site plans which are attached for your review. Also included are
copies of the Zoning Action applications which may aid you in reviewing the
proposals. Also, would you please note on Xour conditions which are standard
and which are ones that you consider special.
Please review the information and submit your comments and recommendations by
Friday, August 21, 1987.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
PAT FRANKOVIC
Assistant Zoning Administrator
PF:llm
. .
.
wt
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
i
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~ ~
~ . s PHONE 456-2205
aL
~ SaOKANE WASNINGTON 99260
,
7
SPOKANC COUNTr COURT MOUSC
~ ZONING NEARING EXA14INER COMMITTEE
~
: A6ENDA: SEPTEMBER 3, 1987
~
.
~ Place: Broadway Centre Building Telephone No.: 456-2205
,
i Second Floor Nearing Room
,
9 North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260
a
~ ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE NEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER BEGINNING AT 9:00
= A.M. TNE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE WILL NORMALLY RECESS FROM 12:00
~ NOON TO 1:30 P.M. FOR LUNCH, OR AS OTHER',JISE ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ITEMS
NOT HEARD PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. MAY BE CONTINUED AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CNAIRMaN OF
TNE ZONIN6 HEARING EXAMINER C0MMITTEE.
9:00 A.M.
~ ZONING APPLICATIONS
~
~ 1. ZW-21-87 AGRICULTURAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-2) ZONE
~ VN-62-87 ROAD FRONTA6E VARIANCE
~ General-iy located east of and adjacent to Grove Road,
~ approximately 700 feet north of the lntersection of the
a Sunset Nighway and Grove Road in Section 22-25-42.
r
4
3 Tax Parcel Numbers: 22523-9037; 9035
~ Comprehensive Plan: Rural
Proposed Use: General Industrial
~ Variance Request: For Tax Parcel 22523-9037 only: A
~ proposed variance to allow
~ development on property having
approximately 60 feet of public
road frontage whereas the Light
' Industrial (I-2) Zone, Section
6.32.310 of the Spokane County
~ Zoning Code, requires 90 feet of
public road frontage.
Site Size: Approximately 15 acres
, Applicant: Don Henrichs
~ East 12121 Sroadway, Bldg. #5
Spokane, WA 99206
NOTE: This application is for two separate actions; a zone change and a
~ variance. The two ltems will be heard concurrently by the Zoning Hearing
Examiner Committee.
0 Otmc,
y~ Sttk-
F i~~`r ~~`~'ry • ~
:.r'~j~ • 3
rrP,
t r~
~,9~ ~
&.tj.0), ,.1/'161
101c. , 101~ .A .0.
Pro.sv f'~' ~ o S2 0
~
I ~
r
I
o ;,9
• ~ ~l~;
• ~ 0-0 ,A 3s
J ° 1 o t'
. a ~ rpss ,
C.
~ $ ~ jl 't CA o +
, s ~ • N
a o c
,
a Q ` ~*u
~ ,,,d 1i► • Ci~► MR'' ~ "
r; ;
,K • ' ' ~ ; ~
c ~
~ V^a ~ '
• 'i
,
~
~ ~ --z6-~ ~ ` I
~
~
r ~w
. . ~
Y
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASStFICATiON
Date: ~ e ;~7 Appiication No:
Name of Applicant:
Street Address of Applicant:
City: ~ State: Zip Code: Tele. No.~~--~~1 - cy~S
Name of Property Owner(s):_,J
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner .11iA,r~ ~~I~JZ 5DQ
Existin9 Zonin9 Classification : A
~
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Existin9 Use of ProPerty:
,
Proposed Zone Classification:
/ ~U,~
Proposed Use of Property: 7~ 7~-lCC° 11~t
Legal Description of Property: lOT'" g k ~e ~vah
r)~ 14d `s-/"
?
,
. • ,
Section: ~ Township. Range:
~ ~o
Source of Legal:
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement)
Property Si2e: '.DDA Frontage:AZ6 Feet on: pi
r
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: A(0 Aje-
,
nu/v
Street Address of the Property:
. ~ ,
If you do not hold 1"t 'le to the property affe ted b ~this application, what is your
interest in it? / o if
f Q~
Please list previous Planning Department actions invoiving this property:
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST 6E ANSWERED:
1. What are the changed conditions of the sJ.te area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? ~Y,&;-~s10w, • ~a
.
2. What effect will the proposed zone recfassification have on the adjacent
properties? ,/t e. , Z E
R ev . 2/3/81
~
,
; .
' APF-:ATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIF...-.ATION--continued-2
.
This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with
written verification that the appiicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before finai submittal to the Planning Department.
1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFiCE
o~
A preiiminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for su ittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
.
,I w 12-9`82
naturjO- (Date `
. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for reione have been satisfied.
he designated wate urveyor for this site is _,TAV//%
7
nature) Date)
3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME)
a) The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service
area.
,
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
' ° ~L~ 7
(Si ature) (Date)
4. BUlLDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for reZOne have been satisfied.
This pro osal i located in Fire District #
5 nature ate
~ COUNTY HEALTH OISTRICT
D~
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant h
~ be informed of our requirements and standards.
(Signature ( Date6 .
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, 1F NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH (S WRtTTEN PEM ~ION FRON1 SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTION N H15 OR HER BERLF.)
-
-
Uc
N (Signed) ~ ~ Date:
0 ~•~.A~~`lf
(Address) Phone:
V NOTARY N v
V Z iP :
POOL c /~/C1 _
jej r 31
„ NOTAR Date: ~ "o~ ~r~~
_
NOTARY SEAL:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
Date :
1 R ev . 2/3/81
41 ~
. ~ 0
ZE 87
;
1 • • \111/ ~
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANN I NG DEPARTMENT
Land U se Appl ication No. ZEc - 367
Property Parcel No. 0 4
ProPertY Address: ~71
ULIO REAL PROPERTY COVENANT AND AGREEMENT
R E C 1 T A l. S:
WNEREAS, Spokane County, pursuant to Chapter 36.70 RCW, Chapter
58.17 RCW, Chapter 43.21C RCW, and Chapter 36.94 RCW, has the legal ability
to attach, as a condition ot approval in conjunction with the approval of
projects and permits authorized under the above provisions, a requirement that
the owners ot the real property which is the subject ot the approval or perm+t,
execute, at the time ot application for any project or permit, a ULID Real
Property Covenant and A9reement, the purpose of which is to protect the
drinking water of the Spokane Vailey - Rathdrum Prairie sole sourCe aquifer, as
provided in the Spokane County Aquiter Sensative Area Overlay Zone, from the
effects of pollution by existing and future sewage disposal practices in areas
which may affect the aquifer;
THIS AGREEMENT AND COVENANT is made and executed this day
of , 19.9 by Spokane County and the owner(s) of the
tollowin9 described real ProPertY,, located in the State of Washin9ton, CountY of
Spokane, to-wit:
s
r
Page - 1 35 87
. • I . wO
~
J 1`
!
/
The above described property is Iocated within an area designated within
the Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan as affecting the Spokane Valley
-Rathdrum Prairie sole source aquifer, and the owners of such property have
made application for a permit or approval from Spokane County, which applica-
tion requires the execution of this Utility Local Improvement District Real Prop-
erty Covenant and Agreement.
(1) OBLIGATION
In accordance with the conditions of application approvai in conjunction
with Land Use Application No. set forth hereinabove, the owners hereby cove-
nant and agree for themselves, their heirs, successors, assi9ns and personal
representatives, to join in any valid petition for the formation a Utifity local
Improvement Oistrict established pursuant to Chapter 36.94 RCW, for the in-
stallation, maintenance or operation of sewer service and facilities which may be
proposed to be established for the area in which the above-described property
is located, and which will serve the above-described property, and said owners
for themselves, their heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives
covenant and aflree not to protest the establishment of such Utilfty Local Im-
provement Oistrict as authorized under RCW 36.94.240 for such area, in serving
said property, whether proposed by petition or resolution of the appropriate
flovernmental agency. PROVIDEO, HQWEVER, this obligation shail not con-
stitute a waiver of any right of said owners, their heirs, successors, assigns
,
or personal representatives to object to or protest the ULID assessment on the
above-described property. 1
(2) COVENANT. ~
The obligation and agreements hereinabove contained are hereby declared
to be covenants running with the above-described land, and shall be binding
,
upon the owners, their heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives
tor the benetit ot the above-described lands and surrounding lands whlch may
be included in such ULID.
The County, upon approval of the permit or project forwhich the docu-
~
ment is executed and running of the appeal time frame, shall execute the docu-
ment and record the same with the Spokane County Auditor. If the permit or
project is ultimately denied, the agreement will not be executed by the County
~
and will be returned to the owner.
?age - 2
Z E 35 87
c
. ~
.
r •
Owner Owner
Owner's Address
We hereby consent to the above agreement and covenant. '
~
Oate leinholder/Contract Seller/Mortgagee/Deed ot Trust Holder
(Signature, title, and company)
,~f'a,e Above-descrtbed property has no leinholders, contract sellers,
mort9agess, deed ot trust holders, or other parties of vested interest
except those whose signatures are show bove.
- -
Signature of Owner '
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
County ot Spokane )
,
O,~~ this day personally appeared before me ~
, to me known to be the indivuduai(s describe tn and
ho executed th• within and toregoing instrument, and acknowled9ed that
he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their tree and voluntary act and deed,
for the uses an~j4punpqsoes'therein mentloned.
~-,kY L 1Iyo
I V E,f` sfkaand oftical seal this ~S day o ,
. .
1 . ' 4;4,
.
NC3TARY
~ • -
• : ~ ~ash R Y I.1 i a d'for the State
~
PUBLIC p ' of 'gton re i g a Spokane. My
. . , .
u'~A ..9A 410 ' commission e ~res
RI C i , 19,0 A,
~
STATE OFI~il~f~►
:6~ ~W*Nt
SS.
County of Spokane )
On this day of , 19 , personally ap-
peared before me to me known to be the of
the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknow-
ledged said instrument to be the free and voiuntary act and deed of said cor-
poration, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that
he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is
the corporate seal of said corporation.
l N wl TN ESS WH ER EOF I have hereunto set my hand and atfixed my seal
the day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUgLIC In and for the State
of Washington reslding at Spokane. My
cormmission expires
60ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHiNGTON
ATTEST:
WII.IIAM E. DONAHUE
Clerk of the Board
gY :
Deputy Clerk
?age • 3 Z E r 35 ~
. 87
,+A,
SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230(3) Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
DE7ERMI NATION OF NON - SI G N I F I C A N C E - "DNS"
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-35-87 AGRICULTURAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-2) ZONE
PROPONEHT: JOSEPH SCHWEHR
Route 1, Box 259
Chattaroy, WA 99003 Phone: (509) 292-2450
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed rezone of approximately 41,000 square feet
for the purpose of developing a contractor's office and storage.
LOCATION of proposal, including street address, if any: Generally located
north of and adjacent to Empire Way approximately 125 feet east of the
intersection of Empire Way and Pitt Street in Section 4-25-44. Street
Address: E. 11915 Empire Way. Tax Parcel Number: 04544-0104.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does
not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI
Position/Title - Spokane County Zoning Administrator Phone -(509)456-2205
Address - Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
z
DATE ISSUED: AUGUST 12, 1987 SIGNATURE: _
This uDNS" is issued under 191-11-340(2); the lead a ency will not act on this
proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date issued ~see above).
COMMENTS MUST 6E SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1987, by
4:00 P.M.
APPEAL Of This Determination may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANHING
DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal deadline is
the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days
after the signing of the Findings and Order. This appeal must be written and
must be prepared pursuant specific criteria on official appeal forms. Contact
the above Responsible Official to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA
appeal.
This "DNS" Form was mailed to agencies and departments as noted below.
l. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane)
3. WA State Dept. of Social and Health Services
4. Spokane County Health District
5. Fire District #1
6. Irvin Water District #6
7. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
8. '208' Water Quality
. 1 ~ULOMUTAL o,DIbANCE
(YAC 197-11-960) 6eecion 11.10 230(1)
Envirocmental Checklist
Pile No. Jr.45
turpose of Checklist: ~
Ttie State Envlrooaental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCIi, requlreo a11 governuentei ngenciea to coneider the envlrormentel lepacte af a proposal
before uking deeisions An Environaental Iupact Steteeent (BIS) must be prepared for all propoeale vith probaDle efgnificant adverse impacts on
the Quallty of the envirortment. The purpooe of this cAeckliet 1• to provide lnformetion to help you end the agencq identlfy Snpacts froo your
proposal (and to reduce or evoid lopacte from the propoeal. if it can be done) •nd to help the egency decide whether an EIS fe redufred
Inetcvctloni for Applicants,
This enviror»eotal checkliot seks you to deacrlbe sme Du ic info nation about your proposal Covernaentel agenciee uee thia checkliot to detervine
vhether the envlroaaeatal impacte of your proposal are signlflcant. reQuiring preparetlon of an EIS Anever the qutstlona briefly. vlth the ■oet
precioe infocution inovn. or give che beot description you can '
Yon eust ansver each Question aceurately and cerefullq, to the Dest of your knovledge. ln aoat caeee. you ehould be eDle to ansver the queetione
froe your own oDservationa or project plane vithout the oeed to hire e:perts. If you reelly do not knov the anever. or if a queetion doee not apply
to your propoeal, vrice 'do aot knov" or 'does not apply " Coaplete ensvers to the Questione nov may nvoid unnecessary deleys later
Some queetions aok about governaental regule[lona, oucA as soning, shorellne. and landmark deoignations. Anever theee questions if you caa If you
have proDlcmo, the gove rnaental egenciea cen eseist you
TAt checklist queotlons applq to a11 parts of your propotal. even if qou plan to do them over a perlod of [!oe or oo dlfferent parcels of land
At[ech any additiooal infocutloa that vill deeeribe your proposal or its envlronaen[el effecte '1he agencq to vhich you eubmit this checklist oay
ask you to explein your anavers or provlde addltionel lnforaation reasonaDly releted to determining !f there aaq be signlficent adveree lopact
Use of checklis[ for nonpro}eet proposals
Camplete this clu cklist for nonproject proposalo. even though Questions may be anrvered "doea not apply'.
IN ADDI2ION, c 4 plete the SOPPLEMNTAL SHM FOR NONPROJECT ACTIdNS(Part D)
Tor nonproject actiotti, tRe referencee in the cheeklist to the vords "project." "applicant," and "property or site' should be rced a• 'propoeal.
"proposer." and "affected geographic area." reepectivelr.
A. BAqCCAOUND
1. Naae of proposed project, if ap licabl
~
G
2. Naae of Applicants
3. Address and phone aumber of appli ua[ or eontaet person- C:?
6~ f - (f ~ d~~~d
~
4. Date checklist p n pared•
Y~ ' ~7 r
5. Agcncy requesting cbecklist -ee ~-7L ~ c K t°
6. Proposed timiag or schedule (including phu iag. if+applicable):
~
7, a. Do you have any plani for future additlons, e:pansion, or furtAer activity related to or connected vith thi• proposalt If yes. e:plain.
b Do rou ova or have options on lacd nearDy or adjacent to thi• proposalt IE yes. explein._-,A---)0
8 List any enviroaaental lnfocma[ion you knov about that ha• Aeen prepered. or v111 be prepared, dicectly releted to thie propasal.
,e v
Z E c
mJ5 ' 87
SPOKAHB ENVIRONlI6NTAL OADINANCB
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
A bACKCHOUHD (contlnued)
9 Do you knov vhether •pp11ut1ons are pendlag for governnental approvala of other propoeal• direccly affecting the property covered by your
propoeelt lf yes. explein
Tv-
, ovn.~J ~
10 Liot eny governaent approvels or peroits thet vill be needed for your proposal kn
e-
v
11 Clve Dr1ef, complete descrlp[!oa of raur proposal. including the proposed uses end the si:e of the project and slte 'ltiere are severel
queotiona lat 1n this checkljt th aek you_to deecrib~q c7ectain aepeste o~ y~r ropoaal ~Yo o no[~ed o repeat those QflBM@CB on thls
Pe6e f' P ~ L' s~• .
r ~
cl, 0> ~ .
12 Locotion of the proposal. Cive •ufficient informatioa to a peroon to uadero[and the preciae location of your propoeed project. lncluding a
otreet addreoe. !f eny. and sectlon, to+mehip eod renge. if knovn. If a proposal vould occur over a renge of area, provide the range or
Dounderies of the •ite (o). Provide a legal description. eite plan, vicinity oap, and topogrephic oep. if reaoonably evailable Hhile you
ahould submi[ any plaoa requSred Dy Lhe agency. you are not reQuired to dupllcate aaps or detailed plene submitted vlth any permft eppllcetion
relaced to thia checklist.
~r
v~ r--- ~
.
13 Does the proposed action lie vithia the Aquifer Sensltive ~(ASA e General S":~ e e tlu, Priority Sever Service AreeTi ~'IT~e
City of Spokanet (See Spokane County's ASA Overley Zone At u s.
TO bL COlPLEZLD EY 1PPLICANT
E ENVIitONlBt7TlIL 81.8?MS
Evaluation For
Agency Uee Only
1 EARTH
a Ceneral description of the site (circle one) D rolling, hilly, eteep slopeo, mountainoue,
other.
/
b Mhat is [he steepeot slope on the site (approxiutt perceat slope)T ~eJ e/
/
c Hhet general [ypes of eoilo are found on the site (for exemple, clay. aend, grnvel. peat, muck)?
If you knov the claselficatlon of agriculturel eoils. epecify [he end note any prime fermlend
Gj G~ k d y+ ~
d Are there surfaee indicatlono or hlstory of uneteble eoils in the i~ediete vicinity? lf so.
deacrlbe H n
p
~
~t~'
~ 3 aPOKAn ZKVIRo~NTAL a~INA=
(MAC 197-11-960) iectioo 11.10.230(1)
E 6NVIROtMbiTAL LlilMMTS(cantinued)
evaluatioo Por
~ency Use Only
e Describe the pnrpose. type, and appro:lu~e titiei of anq filling or grading proposed.
Indicate •ourc o l11. ~f ~
qAb"
c;-,r - z i,
dr& ~C~I• ` A' r 4~*, ' O V
404~ /
f Could erosion occur ea a reault of clearing, eonetructian, or uce7 If eo. generally describe.
ri 'a
g ADout vhat percent of the eite vill be covered vith~qpy[oue surfaceo •f[er projact construc-
tion (for example, asphalt or bulldinge)7
. ,
h Proposed aeasures to reduce or control erosion, o otker impacta'to t earth, if an • ~/r~ /
v
2. AIR
a. type ealaoions to the air vould result freu che propoaal (i.e.. us aucauobil . or
itrial ~rood asoke) during coastruction and vheo the project !o coap ete .
y descr ibe and give appro=la&te qwncitee !f tnovn.
f `
b. Are there any off-tite sov c~• oi i sions or odor that aay affect qour propoaalt If so
generallq describe.
~
~
C. Propoaed mtasures to reduce or coatrol eulasions or otber lapact• to air. if aayr 3~~~
3 WA18R
a Surfacet
(1) Is there any sutface vater bady on or 1a the 1oaeEiate vlclnity of the site includlag year-
rouad and •easooal •[reans, saltwter. lalces, ponds. Metlands)t If yes, descrlbe type and
provide names. If approprlate. sute vhat stream or river !t flove lnto
(2) Will the project requlre any vork over, in, or adjacent to (vlthin 200 feet) the deocribeE
vatersT If yea, please deQ.4rlDe and •ttech available plano
Z 35 Buk7
~ ,
.POKANI U.IRO.OUrrAL oRDrNAXa ~ .
(MAC 49)-11-960) iection 11.I0.230(1)
a. tNYIl01lSIILI. lliIMlf (contiouad) Evalua[loa For
Agener Use Only
(3) Estlmte the amount of fill ana dredge "terial tlut vould Da placed in or reeoved fcom the
•urtac• vator or vatland• and iadi u te the a~of the •ite that vould be aitected. Iedicate
the sourc* of fill "terial. n 1`L2(•
rT~
(4) Mill the proposal rsQuira surface wter vithdrawl• or diverslans4 Cive general descrip-
tioo. pnrposa, and appro:imate awntities if knovn.
(S) Does the propou 1 lle vitAin a 100-year flood plaint If •o, note locatlon on the site plan.
j2 v
(6) Doe• the proposal Involw aoy diecRarges of vaste aaterial• to •urEace vatersf It •o,
descri M the type of vaste aad anticipited voluse of discharge.
D. CROUHDt
(1) Mill sround vattr De vit!►dravn, or vill vater be diseharged to ground vatert Ciw general
descriptioa. purpose. aad appro=laate Quaatities if tnara.
(2) DeseriEe raaste sawial tMt v111 De dlechargeA lnto the groued fsom septic taaks or other
saaitary raste trsataaot facility. Describe the =eoeral •ise of the systm, the auaDer of
howe• to be sorvsd (if app7 uble) or the nuabar of p~r ons the systm(s) are a:paetsd to •erw .
G, ~ % Cc S ~
(3) DeserlEe •ey systsas, other tQao those desiaoed tor the dlsposa1 of uni[ary vaste,
iwtaIltG for the purpose of dlscharQing fluid• belov the ground suriace (leclude• •ysteig such
as tbose for tho diopasal of storm wttr or dralaSe frao iloor drains). Dssesibe the type of
•ystem. the amount of saterial to be disposed of througd the eyeces •nd the trpes of "tarial•
1lkaly to De disposed of (Socludlnj aaterisl• vhieh uy enter t vert*a~tly throuah
•pill• or si a n sult of re fightiog activ 09).
• •
C~r
(1) Y111 any chemical• (especially or=anic solvents or petroleua fuele) De stored in aDove
Qround or undergrouad-Storag~taeka~ If so. what type• acd quantities of wterials v311 be
storedt h n T/
Z E ~ ~
~
. ~
sroKu►rn axvIRotMKui. owINArrcE
(HAC 197-11-960) Seetioa 11.10 230(1)
E. ENVl&OMlU:NTAL RLE?ENTS (continued)
Evaluetion For
Agency Uee Only
(5) lfiat protective measures vill De teken to ineure tRet leaka or spills of eny eheoicels
•tored or ueed on •ite wlll not be alloved to percolate to graund water (thls lncludeo meesurce
co keep cbesieele out of diepooal syotema scribed in 3D(2) and 3D(3)T
e Ze A, ' . c.
c Woter Bunoff (including otorm vater)j
(1) Deecribe the Bource of runoff (including storm vater) ond aethod of collectlon and dieposel
if aoy (loclude Quantities. if knovn) Mh re vill thie ka~yflovt Will thie water flow loto
other vateraf If so. deocsiDe. LA- I'~ U T
~ ~~e.C~ ll~~✓fi ~S
(2) M111 eny cneaicele be etor*d, handled or used on the o1[e in a loca[lon vhere a epill or
leek vill drain to ourface or ground water or to e econ water dispo4al eyetem diechargfng to
sucface or groun4 vater? ~ n
(3) Could vee[e meteriel8 enter ground or surface wateret If •o, geaerelly describe~ ~
. ~►1.~~'~ i-'-s f~
L
d Propoaed acaaures to reduce or control surface, ground, aad sunoff vater lopacte. if any (if
the proposed •ction lie• vithin the Aquifer Senslcive Area De sopeeiallq clear on e:plaeations
relatiag to facilities concerniag Sections 3b(6), 3b(3), md 3e(2) ot tbis chee at)
. ~
4. PI.ANTS
a. Check or circle tqpe of vegetation fovod on the site
deciduous tnec older. aaple. aopeo, other
evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
--Xf shrubs
~grass.
paature
erop or Qrain.
vet @oil plan[o, uttail, but[ercup, bullrueh, skunk cabbage, other
water plantsc water lilly, eelgraas. mllfoil, other
other type• of vegecetion
D Whe[ kind and amount of vegetation vill De removed or alteredT OA-~
c Liet threacened or eodangered opecies kaovn to be o4 or near the oite d/t e
d Proposed landscaping. uQe of ivepl~nt , r o[her neaBUreo to preser°ve or eJ~hence vegetacion
0o the eice, !f any ld~
C ~
, - ' ~
E 35 8
. . ~ t .
~
BPOXANE EKVIROt7lBNTAL OitDINANCE
(MAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1)
D. BJiV1RONlQHTAL EIMMNTB (contlaued)
Evaluetlon For
llgency Uee Only
5 ANIKALS
a Circle any blyde aad anlmels vhich heve been obeerved on or near the eite or ere koovn to De on
or near the •itec
bicda havk, heron, eagle, eongbirde, other
memnele. deer, beer. elk, beaver. other
fieh. Daes, salaon, trout. herring, ehellfieh, other
others
b. Liet any threatened or endangered speciee kaovn to be on oz near the site.
c Ie the •1[c part of a mlgration routeY If so, expleio. /`o/o
d Propoied seaoure• to preserve or enhance vildllfe. if any:
s
1A.C
~ /o
6 ENERCY AND NA'l11RAL BESOURCES
a Mhat kiads of energy (electric, oatural ga4, vood etove, solar) vill be used to aeet che
the coopleted projec['s nergy n edot DescriDa vhether ic vill De uied for heating. meoufec- ~ •
turiag. e[c. t _ ~ 10 • ` I I
b Nould your pro)ect affect the potential use of solar energy Dy edjrcent propertiest If eo.
Qenerally describe
o1b
c What kinds of energq conservetioo feature• are laeluded in the Qlani of thie propooal4 List
other propooed uasureo to reduce or control eaergy iapaece, if eay.
7 ENVIRONNENTAL HEAL2H
8. Are there any envirocmental health hesacds, lacludlag cxpooure to tosic cheaicals, risk of fire
and etploelon, @pill, or hasardou• vaste, thet could occur a• a result of this proposal! If so,
descrlbe.
~(2
(1) Deecribe opecial emergency eervicee thet mighired
Q /._r ,K ~ J
i
u ti-L-E . 35 • 87
iJ i 11 70U) a«iiuik ii Iu uutlJ I
~ MMIlO1QMl1?wL. RliL%Rll!'i (contiawd)
Evi'luatlon 1or
Asee►cy Use Only
Zt1VIROR![LH?AL [1QALTH
(2) Propased seasure• to teduce os eontrol enviroamental Malth hosards, !f anya
e Noi.e:
(1) What type• of noise e:ist !a tRe area vhich uy affect your pro)ect (for exasplat traffic,
eQuipmot, operetion, othert
/~b N E ! R~ ra 0-d S ~ d
-,A.)v r- ~ ~ ~ ~W%-, o
y
(2) What type• aod levels of ooise vould se crestod Dy or u sociated vith the pro3sct on a
•hort-te n or a long-[ecs buis (tor a:asple: traffic ~tion. operation, otherl Iadicate
vtut houra noise vould co~s froo tRe •ite.
(3) Propoa*d masure to reduce or control noise ispacts. if aays
o.,~ ~
8. U►HD AND SHORSLINE USE
8. What i• tha cucrtat w e of the •it• aad adjaceat propertiest
d
e. Nas the •it* D~en us~d tor agsieultuset I1 •o. descrlM. / v
~
c. DescriDe any •tructures oo tre •it*. S:i~--~_ 'PeJ }~vC~ lr~, ~/~/Py~
.h o ~-P
d. Yill aoy •tivctura• be daollshedf It •o. vAiehf ~
A,Q!11- a 7LA.C ,
e. What is the curreot sonin= clu sifiution of the •icef
~
f. What io the eurrent campreAensin plaa desijastion ot the •ltat !
♦ (/U i'
.
~6w
S. It applieable, vhat is th* curreat shorelinA saster proQru desisnatioe of tho sitef
A. Has aey part ot tAe •i[e been classified as an "snvisomeotelly seaa![ive" areat If so.
spacify
i. Appro:i"tely hov unr people vould reslda or vork in the c pleted projectT ~A- ~
` Z, v
35 40'
c 801,y
- ~
StOTA1iE OtVIRORMBNZAL OIDIWC,s
(YAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1)
1. ENVIR0IQMTAI. [IiMTS (Cal►t1nmA) Evaluatlon Por
Agency Use Only
j AppTOximately hov aanq peopla vould the completed projeet dioplacet
k Propoaed oeaoure• to avoid or reduce dieplaeesent impacto, if any
1. Proposed messure• to e re tRe proposal i~ cpnpati~e_vittl e:loting and projected land uee• and~ ~y
plans, if any _ ~
, ~ .
9 HOUSINC ~J ~ Q~/ i Jv~~~s' ~ /~~O • ~~l. . .
a. Appro:laately hov • q nite vould De provided, if anyt Iodicate vhether Aigh. ■lddle. or
lov-lacoae houslag. 7 t.) or- .
I
b Appco:loately hov aany ueits. if any, vould be elleiwttd Iedicats vltiether hish, mlddle.or
lowiacme housing
~
c Propwed musure• to reduce or eantrol Aousing impacts. if aaqs
10 AESTNBTICS / 6 /
Mhat i• the tallest Aeight of aay proposed structuse (s) aot ia ludiag aAteanas; vfiat is the
prineipal e:terior buildiny mterial(s) propoaedt C~ O~
A Q2%_
b. fdhat vlew in the isediate vicinitq would De altered or obstructed4 ~1 Q T~
c. Proposed aeasures to reduee or control usthetic iap:ets. !f •ny
11 LIGHT AND CLARE
e. 6lhat type of light or Qlere vill the proposal produceT What tise of day vould it mainly occurY
f~ o--)~ - c-
b Could light or glare froo the flelehed project be a wfety hasard or interfere vith vieveY
e,>v
c Vhat exlsting off-site rource• of light or glare my affect your proposel?
i✓ v
d Propoeed measures to reduce or control 11ght and glare Impncto, if eny
nah~° •
~
. 35 . 87
.
. • 0J IroUU cNvIRoaaHw. oRcINAMM
(MAC 197-11-960) Beetion 11.10.270(1) ~
3. ENv2so1MRNlAL CtofEM (eoociowa) Evalwtioa Por
Agency Use Only
12. BECBEATIOl1
a Hhat designated and inforsal recreatioesl opportunities •re in the imediataly vicinityt
U.^~-
D. Mould the proposed project displace any e:isting recreatlonal usesT If •o, deocrlDe.,A)V
c. Proposed ma sure• to ceduce or coa[rol lspact• oo recru loa. including reerutioa opportuaitie•
to De provided by the project or applicaat. if aey. ~,,,0
13 8ISlORIC AND CULNRAL PRLSLRVATION
a. An there aey places os oDjects llsted on, or propossd for wtional. •tate, or loeal pre u cva-
tion registers knova to be on or ne:t to the •itef If so. generally QescriDe
U
b. Generally descriDe any landmarks or evidence of historie archee logic41~ lentific or cultural
liportance lcnovn to be on or ne:t to the oIte. ~(J
c. Propossd masure• Lo reduce or control Iapacta, if aoys ~0 oq`''
14. 'lAANSYOiITATION
8. Identify puDlic •treets and hig6wy• secving the •ite. aod descriDe proposed access to the
e:isting •treet •ystes. Shov on slte pLns. it any.
I'A
E. L•ite currently se ned Dy puDlie traa~ct If aot. vhat i• the approziu te distance to the
warsat transit •topt
r ~
c. Hov saay parting spau• vo the co~pletad pro,yec[ hav~e? Hoy aaay wrould the pro,yect elialoatet
~vl.c_
~
d Y111 the proposal raQuire any aev coads or •treets, or improvement• to existleg rosd• or •tr ea,l
eot iacludioa driwwayst If so. ge w rally describe (lodi ate vhether public or private). ~J
e W111 the project w e(or occur !n [h/ e 1~Qediate viclaity of) rrater, nll, or air tn nsportetioni
If so, generally describe
df._..
Z 3 5 87
L.
. p 1U t ~
BPORAIfa [NVIRONlCKNiAL ORDINIUICE
(MAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11 10 230(1)
E. ENVIROtMbNIAL LL6N6DiTS (eontiuwd)
Evsluetion Por
Agency Uoe Only
f Hov aanq veAicular tripo pec day vould De g~nerated by the coopleted projecc? If knovn,
indicate vheo peak vould occur ~ '-:X_ ~
g Proposed aeaoures to reduee or control transportation impacts. 1f eny ./V V xJ ~
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a. ilould the project result in an increased need for public •ervice• (for e:aaple Pire pr ~tef t~ion.
police protection. health care. ochools. other)1 If •o, generally descrlbe V~
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direc[ impacts on puDlic services. if ony (N v~~
16 UTILITIES
a. Clrele utlrrently available ~ ek<trleJL*4 ral 11te efupy~
oanitarq •ever. ptic •ye or'he+
•ervice, %Mhoqg
D Describe the utllities that are proposcd fot the prolect. the utility providing the service and
the general coostructio activitie• oo tAe •ite or in the loediate viciaitq vhich ■igh[ be
aeeded. C.
C. SICNAIVAE
I, [he undersigned, svear under the peneltq of perjury that the •bove responses are sede truthfully acd to the besc of uy knowledge. I el.o
understand that, •hould there be any villful oiorepresentation or villful lack of Eull disclosure on my pert, the yency my vithdrav any
dececainetioe of ooesignlficaace thet i[ dight lssue in reliance upon thie checklist
Date Proponent
(Pleaie Print or Type
Proponent. Address. _oo~j
10
~
Phone • 59 J/p
Persoo cospletiog form. ` _J Dete.
Phone •
FOR S?AY► USE ONLY
S[aff Kember(a) Qevievlag Checklis
Beeed on this s[eff reviev of the envlronmen e checkliot onE other pertinent information, the ataff
ACoocludes that there ere no proDeDle •ignlficant adverse impacts •nd recomnertds a de[ermination of noneignificeoce
~
B Conclude• that probable afgniEicant adverse environmeatal fopacts do exiet for the current proposal and recooend• a aitigated deter-
eination of nonslgnifiu nce vith conditions
C Conclude• that tAere are probaDle sigoificant adrerse envlroteenta1 lepacto end rec a truination of •ignifieance
FZLINC !Le - j15.00 0
•
35
87