2007, 12-05 Permit App: 07004698 Pole BuildingProject Number: 07004698 Inv: I Application Date: 12/5/2007 Page 1 of 2
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Proiect Information:
Permit Use: 40 X 68 POLE BLDG Contact: SPOKANE STRUCTURES
Address: 510 N MULLAN ST
C S - Z: SPOKANE, WA 99206
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone: (509) 927-0655
Group Name:
Site Information:
Project Name:
Plat Key: Name: Range District: East
Parcel Number: 55063.0133 Block: Lot:
SiteAddress: 17321 E DALTON AVE Owner: Name: JOHNSON, RONALD F & SHELLY
Address: 8111 N JENSEN RD
Location:: CSV SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99217
Zoning: I-2 Light Industrial
Water District: 134 CONSOLIDATED ID #19 Hold: ❑
Area: 27,225 Sq Ft Width: 0 Depth: 0 Right Of Way (ft): 0
Nbr of Bldgs: 0 Nbr of Dwellings: 0
Review Information: .. u .
Review
Building Plan Review
Septic Sys Review
Originally Released:
Originally Released:
Landuse/Zoning/HE Conditions
Released'By k - .
11/29/2007 By: tmelbourn
12/4/2007 . By: LHALSEY
ReleasedBy C
Originally Released: 11/28/2007 By: mpalaniuk
Permits:
Operator: jmm Printed By: jmm Print Date: 12/5/2007
Project Number: 07004698 Inv: 1 Application Date: 12/5/2007 Page 2 of 2
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Notes:
Payment Summary•
Pen -nit TylJe Fee Amount Invoice Amount Amount Paid Amount Owing
Building Permit , $826.69 $826.69 $0.00 $826.69.
$826.69 $826.69 $0.00 $826.69
Disclaimer:
Submittal of this application certifies the owner (or person(s) authorized by the owner) has both examined and finds the information
contained within to be true and correct, and agrees that all provisions of laws and/or regulations governing this type of work will be
complied with. Subsequent issuance of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of
the provisions of the code or of any other state or local laws or ordinances.
Signature•
Operator: jmm Printed By: jmm Print Date: 12/5/2007
Building Permit
Contractor: SPOKANE STRUCTURES INC
Firm: SPOKANE STRUCTURES INC
Address: 510 N MULLAN RD
Phone: (509)
927-0655
SPOKANE, WA 99206
This Application:
Total Project:
Description Grp Type
Notes
Sq Ft Valuation
Sq Ft Valuation
POLE BDLG U-1 VB
POLE BLDG
2,720 $51,680.00
2,720 $51,680.00
Totals:
2,720 $51,680.00
2,720 $51,680.00
Item Description
Units
Unit Desc
Fee Amount
RESIDENTIAL PERMIT FEE
1
SELECT
$657.75
ACCESSORY PLANS REVIEW
1
SELECT
$164.44
WSBC SURCHARGE
1
SELECT
$4.50
Permit Total Fees:
$826.69
Notes:
Payment Summary•
Pen -nit TylJe Fee Amount Invoice Amount Amount Paid Amount Owing
Building Permit , $826.69 $826.69 $0.00 $826.69.
$826.69 $826.69 $0.00 $826.69
Disclaimer:
Submittal of this application certifies the owner (or person(s) authorized by the owner) has both examined and finds the information
contained within to be true and correct, and agrees that all provisions of laws and/or regulations governing this type of work will be
complied with. Subsequent issuance of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of
the provisions of the code or of any other state or local laws or ordinances.
Signature•
Operator: jmm Printed By: jmm Print Date: 12/5/2007
Project Number: 07004698 Inv: I Application Date: 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Proiect Information:
Permit Use: 40 X 68 POLE BLDG Contact: SPOKANE STRUCTURES
Address: 510 N MULLAN ST
C - S - Z: SPOKANE, WA 99206
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone: (509) 927-0655
Group Name:
Site Information: Project Name:
Plat Key: Name: Range District: East
Parcel Number: 55063.0133 Block: Lot:
SiteAddress: 17321 E DALTON AVE Owner: Name: JOHNSON, RONALD F & SHELLY
Address: 8111 N JENSEN RD
Location:: CSV SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99217
Zoning: I-2 Light Industrial
Water District: 134 CONSOLIDATED ID #19 Hold: ❑ .
Area: 27,225 Sq Ft Width: 0 Depth: 0 Right Of Way (ft): 0'
Nbr of Bldgs: 0 Nbr of Dwellings: 0 _
Review Information:
Review
Building Plan Review
Septic Sys Review
Landuse/Zoning/HE Conditions
Permits:
R eleased
Released By 44-
12eleased By u . , • d.
Operator: jmm Printed By: jmm Print Date: 11/28/2007
-r
Permit Center
crrr OF -1 11703 E Sprague Ave, Suite•B1'3�� PERMIT NUMBER:
Spokane Spokane Valley, W. 99206 r . � j� \JAI-I-f•Y' PERMIT FEE:
Valley° (509)688-0036 LF :Cp-O§ '�§-0037,�,��
w•ww.sQokanevallev.or_,,^`' 2 $�
Community Development
Residential Construction PER t1.N ustruction [:]Accessory Bldg
Permit Application Addition/Remodel ❑ Deck
❑ Other:
SITE ADDRESS:
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO: 5 S O (.3 , o t 33 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Building Owner: �/
Name /S l4e.li �O14)t/ SOIL%
Address `it L I /V . J &W $F V �U
City' '0�;. State -WA. Zip: �N
Phone: Q3 5 Fax:
Contact Person
Name: .4cu/1S
Phone: O(, S S"'
Describe the scope of work in detail:
Contractor:
DINAFNSIONS:
Name:
Address.. 510 N. MULLAN
ROAD
City:
State: Zip:
WA 9()2M
Phone:
Fax:
Contractor Lic No:
City Business nc. o:
Exp Date:
J
Cost of Project: $ U'9 -m
Po sr SAA otG' 13 cli L�, A/4 1/0 k (o b
Proposed Use: G k-0
**************The following MUST be complete: (write N/A if not applicable)**********************
HEIGHT TO PEAK:
DINAFNSIONS:
# OF STORIES:
TOTAL HABITABLE SPACE:
744
MAIN FLOOR TO SQ.
2' FLOOR SQ. FTG:
UNFIN BASEMENT SQ. FTG:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
FTG
-
AREA: i
� �O
FINISHED BASEMENT
VARAGE SQ. FTG:
DECK/COV. PATIO SQ. FTG:
30% SLOPES ON
SQ. FTG:
elf
PROPERTY:
# OF BEDROOMS:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
HEAT SOURCE:
SEWER O SEPTIC? I
I
The permitee verifies, acknowledges and agrees by their signature that: 1) If this permit is for construction of or on a dwelling, the
dwelling is/will be served by potable water. 2) Ownership of this City of Spokane Valley Permit inure to the property owner. 3) The
signatory is the property owner or has permission to represent the property owner in this transaction. 4) All construction is to be done
in full compliance with the City of Spokane Valley Development Code. Referenced codes are available for review at the City of
Spokane Valley Permit Center. 5) This City of Spokane Valley Permit is not a permit or approval for any violation of federal, state or
local laws, codes or ordinances. 6) Plans or additional information may be required to be submitted, and subsequently approved before
this application can be processed.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Method of Payment:
❑ Cash ❑ Check ❑ Mastercard
Bankcard #: Expires:
Authorized Signature:
REVISED 2Jt5;07
❑ VISA
VIN#:
Spokane
Valley�
For City Use Only/ c
PLUS Project Number
Project Address / 7; % i >^, .47.v/A.
11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.688.0036 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0037 ♦ permitcenter@spokanevalley.org
As part of our on-going commitment to customer service during the review process of your. project
application, we are providing you with a TARGET DATE for the initial technical application review. If for
any reason we cannot meet this date, we will contact you with a revised target date.
Your application review TARGET DATE is
The TARGET DATE is the date we estimate your project application will have ,had its initial technical
review. It is not the date for approval or permit issuance.
Tips for a Smoother Project Application Review
Submit complete, accurate plans and documents.
Extra time may be required for re -submittals as project application reviewers work on multiple applications and it
may be several days before they can look at your new or revised information.
Designate a specific contact person to communicate with the City.
While the person designated as the applicant's contact person with the City can -be changed, one individual with the
expertise.for dealing with reviewer comments would be the best choice for the entire review process.
➢ Call staff regarding the status of your project only after the target date shown at the top of the page.
Although you should be contacted on or by the target date, please feel free to contact us if you haven't heard from us
by your target date. Staff may contact you before the target date if the initial review is complete. By following this
procedure, you will save time and allow the reviewers to complete the work more expeditiously.
Steps in the Permit Process
1. Counter Complete. Your application has been accepted as counter complete. This means all of the required
documents, as indicated on your Pre -Application Checklist.have been submitted or have been approved for deferred
submittal. This does not prevent technical staff from requesting additional information as_a result of their technical review.
2. Quality Check. The next step in the process is a quality check to make sure that the application is reviewable and free
from substantive flaws that would prevent technical staff from completing the technical review once it is started. When
this step is complete, your application will be routed to the appropriate staff and remain in their review. queue until it
comes up for review.
3. Technical Compliance. Once an application is administratively complete, it is routed to technical staff for compliance
review. Depending on the type 'of project, technical staff may include multiple reviewers. You should be contacted by
phone, fax, email, or mail by your TARGET DATE once the initial technical compliance review is complete.
4. Permit Issuance. When the technical compliance review of the application is complete, including any subsequent re -
submittals, each reviewer will approve their section of the application and route it to the Permit Center. When all sections
of the application are received, a Permit Specialist will process the application and contact the person specified on your
application for permit pick-up. Information regarding fees and pre -construction meetings (if required) will be provided by
the Permit Specialist at that time.
WHITE -APPLICANT PINK - BUILDING FILE REV 9/07
11/28/2007 13:52 5093241567 SRHD EHS PAGE 01/01
- • ' ' "" ' L-"'-, l I 5096880037 TO 3241567 P-01/02
• Project Number: 07004698 Inv: I
Appl.icaflon Date: 11/28/7007 Page I of 7
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT �(v—/dam
Penalties will be assessed for commencing Work without a permit
Pr 'ecr In or) talion:
Permit Use: 40 Ji 68 POLE BLDG Contact: SPOKANE STRUCTURES
Address: 510 N MULLAN 8T
C - S - Z: SPOKANE, WA 99206
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone. (509) 927-0635
Group Name:
sal"¢ (hfornlala<oh: Project Name:
Plat Y Name: Range District. East
---
Parcel Number: 55063.0133 Block: Lot; -- __._.._,_..__ .....
SiteAddress: 17321 E DALTON AVE Owncr: Narnc: JOHNSON, RONALD F & SMLLY
Addross: 8111 N JENSEN RD
Location:; CSV SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99217
Zoning: I4 Light Industrial
Water District: 134 CONSOLIDATED ID #19 Hold: ❑
Area: 27,225 Sq Ft Width: o Depth: 0 Right Of Way (ft): 0
Nbr ofBldgs: 0 Nbr of Dwellings: 0.
Beplew tnfor"atiQ�-
e��ew
Building Plan Review �r
Septic Sys Review,�gW._--,,,.--x-. ..._.._...__..--
(��� p I tR Coykac•���t'•r�� �l-2��� �' �•�.;;:'':�;;�:.': 't°i, •'F;, �``
ITUI,Gt i�b�Si h •� '�.�r'�:� � a."�:.1.. .i•:,�?�;aN1-,:�1��
---------------
Landuse/Zoning/M Conditions
operator: jmm Printed By: jmm Print Date: 11/28/2007
NQU 29 2007 13:49 5093241567 PAGE.01
Page 1 of 3
Glenn Ulrich
From: "Kathy -McClung <kmcclung@spokanevalley.org>
To: "Glenn Ulrich" <glennssi@comcast.net>
Cc: "Rob Lewis" <rlewis2664@aol.com>; "Micki Harnois" <mharnois@spokaneva[ley.org>; "Greg McCormick"
<gmccormick@spokanevalley.org>; "Mike Turbak" <MTurbak@spokanevalley.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: Existing residential use in 1-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
Mr Ulrich- I met with the planners this morning and after review of the Code we are in agreement that since the new UDC
does not specify "residential use" vs residential zone, we will interpret the code to mean residential zone. We believe this
is the intent of the Code and will clarify this in the next round of code amendments. In the meantime, a residential use can
build with a 10 foot setback, which I think solves your clients problem. If you want to provide a copy of this email with your
building permit submittal it will assist staff to know the setback has been approved through an interpretation. -Kathy
McClung, Community Development Director.
From: Glenn Ulrich [mailto:glennssi@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Kathy McClung
Cc: Rob Lewis
Subject: Fw: Existing residential use in I-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
Kathy;
Below is some communication I have been having with Micki Harnois concerned with setbacks in an 1-2 Zone where the
present use is residential. Would you kindly look this over and then email me or call me for a formal discussion as to what
the interpretations are for this situation.
Your help to resolve this issue will be very appreciated.
---- Original Message ---
From: Micki Harnois
To: Glenn Ulrich
Cc: Rob Lewis
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:55 PM
Subject: RE: Existing residential use in 1-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
Glenn,
I am advising you to ask our director, Kathy McClung for a formal interpretation of the setback. She is the only one in the
Community Development Department that has the authority to do this. Her email is kmcclung(a)_spokanevalley.org.
Thank you for your patience,
Micki
From: Glenn Ulrich [mailto:glennssi@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 12:45 PM
To: Micki Harnois
Cc: Rob Lewis
Subject: Re: Existing residential use in I-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
I think I need to see you to go over this issue. The data I have shows that under the old zoning the parcels were in an 1-1
zone which called for a 50 sideyard & rear yard setback when adjacent to a residential ( see 14.630.325 in the old
codes.). The 1-2 zone setbacks were 5' when adjacent to residential as shown in 14.632.325 of the old codes.
I realize that in the new zoning codes, the setback for a parcel in the 1-2 zone is 35' when adjacent to residential zone.
However the parcel in question is adjacent to an 1-2 zone with the present use being residential. So how is the
determination made? Is it based on present use or actual zoning? I would think that since the zoning was changed that
the owner of the parcels should be allowed to do what the code allows irrelavent of what the present use is.
I need to argue this point with you so I can be satisfied with the final decision.
11/28/2007
V
Regards
Glenn
-- Original Message
From: Micki Harnois
To: Glenn Ulrich
Cc: Rob Lewis
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:33 AM
Subject: RE: Existing residential use in 1-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
Page 2 of 3
When the accessory structure was built on Parcel Number 55063.0140 no setback was required as the zoning was also
1-2 as was the zoning for Parcel Number 55063.0133 (17321 E Dalton).
The new development standards effective on October 28, 2007 state that the side and rear setbacks for 1-2 zoning is 35
feet when adjacent to residential. This is shown in Chapter 19.60 (Table 19.60-1)
Micki
From: Glenn Ulrich [mailto:glennssi@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:20 PM
To: Micki Harnois
Cc: Rob Lewis
Subject: Existing residential use in I-2 zone in codes effective 10/28/07
Micki we have a situation where the area is zoned 1-2, under the newly adopted codes, and most of the present use is
residential.
Our client wants to build an accessory storage building on Parcel Number 55063.0133 and wants to set it back from the
North and East P/L at 10'-0". This parcel is bordered on the East by Parcel Number 55063.0136 which is zoned 1-2 but
presently used as residential. It is bordered at the North by Parcel Number 55063.0135 which is also zoned 1-2 and
present use is commercial.The Northern 91' of this parcel is bordered on the West by Parcel Number 55063.0140 which
is zoned 1-2 and the present use is commercial. Then the Southern most 181' of this parcel is bordered on the West by
Parcel Number 55063.0132 which is zoned 1-2 but present use is residential.
My question is what chart do we use to determine the allowed setback for an accessory building for Parcel Number
55063.0133 that is presently used as a residence and will continue to be used as a residence. We were told by Tavis
Schmidt who consulted with Greg McCormick that the setback had to be 35' since it is adjacent to a present in use
residential parcel and the parcel that the accessory building is to be built on is also presently in use as residential.
Somehow that did not compute in my mind and I need some explanation as to how that decision was made or based
on.So in my mind we either use the new zone 1-2 rules or we use the residential setback rules.Chapter 19.70 states that
the setback for 1-2 adjacent to residential zoning is 35' and in Chapter 19.40.020 it shows that the side yard setback is
5'.
I might point out that last year we constructed a commercial building on Parcel Number 55063.0140 and were allowed a
set back of 5' on both the North and West P/L's where the property at the West was zoned 1-1 but was used as a
residence.
Please help me sort this out and if the decision still remains that a 35' setback is required then I will need that in writing
explaning to me what logic or codes were used to make that decision.
Respectfully;
Glenn Ullrich
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1111 - Release Date: 11/5/2007 4:36 AM
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1111 - Release Date: 11/5/2007 4:36 AM
11/28/2007
75'
PLANNING DEPT. APPROVE
BY
DATE:z/�
NEW ..
GARAC
0 x6
±72 0_ SF _
RON JOHNSON
P/N 55063.0133
Z's NE 1-2
resent Use ResideimitieB
ExpS1 IN G
.1,045 SF
_RESIDE.NC
7
DA LION AVE_.
WAMBEKE ENGINEERING 2913 East 61S` Court
Daniel Wambeke; P. E. Spokane, WA.99223
Telephone: 509=443-6186 • Fax: 509-448-6582 • dwambeke @msn.com
November 27, 2007
Mr. Glenn Ullrich
SPOKANE STRUCTURES, :INC.
510 N. Mullin Road
Spokane, WA 99206
SUBJECT: 40'X 68'X 116 POST FRAME BUILDING FOR RON JOHNSON, 17321 DALTON, SPOKANE
VALLEY, WA
PARCEL # 55063.0133
Dear Glenn:
Spokane Structures sold this post frame building to Mr. Johnson for erection in Spokane Valley, WA using standard
post frame building plans I have prepared for Spokane Structures. The building is designed for 30 PSF roof live
(snow) load, 85 MPH wind speed, Exposure B, Seismic Design Category C, 2,000 PSF allowable soil bearing
pressure and IBC 2006.. The building has 10' post spacing and 4:12 roof trusses_
I have reviewed the design of this building and checked it for the diaphragm design requirements used in
development of the standard plans. The rear endwall has no openings. There is sufficient sheeting on this endwall to
provide adequate lateral bracing for this endwall of the building against lateral loads on the roof and sidewalls.
The front endwall has no openings. There is sufficient sheeting on this endwall to transfer lateral loads on the
sidewall and roof to the base of the building.
The left sidewall has no openings. The right sidewall has two 12'x 14' overhead doors with roof trusses supported by
glue lam beams. Sidewall openings have no effect on the lateral load resistance of this building.
You may use the standard post frame building plans to erect this building with details for the glue lam beams.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions about the design of this building.
Incerely,
aniel Wambeke, P.E.
Enclosure
DW:dw
EXPIRES W a,j-
sm
Designer of Small Structures; Post Frame Buildings, Foundations,
Light Gauge Steel Framing and Grain .Storage Systems
f '":If
66; cy
2 PLC's - .
18067
EXPIRES CLI
(-
4-:6 -
RON JOHNSON
17321 E. DALTON
401 x 681 Shop/Garage (2,720 sf)
40"-o .
4
141.tEs ..........__. ..LSV> ' L®.
RON JOHNSON
17321 E. a,ALTON
.40' x 68' Shop/Garage (2,720 0)
IEXPIRES 1.2-6 .144- I
-.45-0.
I
.......
...
�
NEW ...
:
,720 ....SF..... -
- ....__
.....
75' _
.1,Q45 SF
BORT JOHNSON
P/N 55063.0133
---- - +tet--
........
.... .
ZONED 12 ._....-
- -
Pccseent Use Raidlcmt®a>I
c>
_... _ .. __ ................
.
75�
DALTON
AVEC-..._ _.....__....:..
5 1/8" X 12" GLUE
LAM BEAM
24F -V4, DF/DF
TWO 2" X 6"
BLOCKS
MANUFACTURED TRUSS
4 - SDS 1/4" X 1 1/2
MANUFACTURED
TRUSS
SIMPSON HGA10
- SDS 1/4" X 3°
-1 1/2" X 9 1/2"
DOOR FACER
L 12' DOOR OPENING
SECTION C -C
AVE LINE
SIMPSON ECCO 5 1/4-6-
SDS2 COLUMN CAP
6" X 8" HEM -FIR #2
TREATED POST
EXPIRES
Daniel Wambeke. r' E.
BY _1 --VA AT"SUBJECT
AIA/ �Gr�F�uN ��L�.Di�✓G
PAGE NO. _ � OF.
WAMBEKE ENGINEERING
2913 E. 61st Court
DAT; /`Z� U�.
-- ___.— _.
Pf+OJEC' • ;. _ w�
Spokane. WA 9922?
9C9I'll 3-6186
F^, 589/448-6582
4 -AO 62vph ,61-rp f (�/Z) C It. 1 i) C36 f,� _ kls B a
14Sri (L&ljf /,f f/ldl S �� `�Y 12--,( Jr�1D,c
dry = X10 1.4rI" F = /,
Z4 31-1,0
6o12- ,eLr(lL)1 Z 3 �a.�-�
�o z6d TSL
QAll r4 t� a 2- b z b`f �lov) Z i. �0.�_________� -- D: 3 i / / 1✓ &riGij
?O'Fle-3 a-- -oodw ( Tiea/) (t?4, )
EXPIRc_5 ) 1 Q,/4/}