The URL can be used to link to this page

2015, 07-14 Formal Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,July 14,2015 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Chris Brummett,Valley Fourth Memorial Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of vouchers on July 14,2015 Request for Council Action Form Totaling $1,159,777.88 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 30 2015: $469,936.38 c.Approval of June 16,2016 Budget Workshop Council Meeting Minutes d.Approval of June 23,2016 Formal Format Council Meeting Minutes e.Approval of June 30,2015 Study Session Council Meeting Minutes NEW BUSINESS 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Franchise—Erik Lamb [public comment] 3. Proposed Resolution 15-006 Adopting Indigent Defense Standards—Erik Lamb [public comment] 4.Motion Consideration: Transportation Improvement Board Call for Projects—Steve Worley [public comment] 5.Motion Consideration: Mullan Road Street Preservation Bid Award—Steve Worley [public comment] 6.Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments—Mayor Grafos [public comment] Council Agenda 07-14-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 7. Stormwater Call for Projects—Eric Guth 8. Lodging Tax Update—Mark Calhoun 9.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos INFORMATION ONLY: 10.Regional Wayfinding Concept Plan CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nand 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 1st 3"and 51 Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 07-14-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: ►:1 Check all that apply: ►/ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 06/18/2015 6162-6183 $1,492.00 06/18/2015 35700-35732; 617150124 $307,606.15 06/22/2015 35733-35754 $186,421.02 06/22/2015 5163; 5172; 5173; 5175; 5176 $77,460.69 06/26/2015 6184-6204 $2,075.50 06/29/2015 35755-35806 $577,199.80 07/01/2015 35807-35812 $7,522.72 GRAND TOTAL: $1,159,777.88 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 -General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511. City Council 101 —Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 106—Solid Waste 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 120-CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 121—Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.032.000. Public Works 123—Civil Facilities Replacement 001.058.050.558. CED-Administration 204—Debt Service 001.058.051.558. CED—Economic Development 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.058.055.558. CED—Development Services-Engineering 302 - REET 2 Capital Projects 001.058.056.558. CED—Development Services-Planning 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.058.057.558 CED—Building 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.000.576. Parks&Rec—Administration 310—Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.301.571. Parks&Rec-Recreation 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.302.576. Parks& Rec-Aquatics 402—Stormwater Management 001.076.304.575. Parks & Rec- Senior Center 403—Aquifer Protection Area 001.076.305.571. Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement 001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't-Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural&Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Interim Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/18/2015 4:35:32PM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6162 6/18/2015 004366 ALLEN,CHERYL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSITTERRACE VIE' 52.00 Total : 52.00 6163 6/18C2015 004358 AMERICAN EXPRESS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.89 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total : 52.00 6164 6/102015 004369 BERG, HEATHER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total : 52.00 6165 8/18/2015 004364 BRADLEY, RACHEL PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVRY PLA 52.00 Total : 52.00 6166 6/102015 004360 CARFF,CHERYL PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREENACRES 52.00 Total : 52.00 6167 8/18Q015 004368 COUSINS, MICHELE PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6168 6/18/2015 004370 GOSSARD,SAMANTHA PARKS REFUND 001.23710.98 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total : 52.08 8169 8/102015 003192 HUNTER,SHANI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total : 52.00 6170 6/102015 004372 MAURO,SUSIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.90 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total ; 52.00 6171 8/102015 004373 MILLIRON, BETH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME? 52.00 Total : 52.00 6172 6/18/2015 004374 MOHAMMED,ABDULRAZIK PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 140.00 Total : 140.00 6173 8/18/2015 004357 NEU, CHANDA PARKS REFUND 001.33710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 52.00 Total : 52.00 6174 6/102015 004367 RAMIREZ, ERIN PARKS REFUND 00123710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 . vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/1812015 4:35:32PA8 Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6174 6/102015 004387 004307 RAMIREZ, ERIN (Continued) Total : 52.00 6175 8/18/2015 004382 ROGERS, MICHELE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREENACRES 52.00 Total : 52.00 6176 6/18/2015 004363 SCHMIDTLEIN,JESSICA PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PA 52.00 Total : 52.00 6177 6/18/2015 004361 SPOKANE VOLUNTEERS PARKS REFUND 001.23710.89 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREENACRES 52.00 Total : 52.00 6178 6/102015 003089 STANLEY, MONICA PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 53.00 6179 6/18/2015 001452 VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6180 8/102015 004365 WALL-CARPINTEYRO, SHELENA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6181 6/18/2015 004359 WALLINGFORD,WENDY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.90 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREENACRES 52.00 Total : 52.00 6182 6V102015 003070 WENTZ, SANDY PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND 107.00 Total : 107.00 6183 8/18/2015 004371 WINDERMERE MARATHON LLC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.90 DAMAGE DEPOSIT K4|RA8EAUME/ 257.00 Total : 257.00 22 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank tota : 1,492.00 22 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1492.00 3 _�_ vchlist Voucher List Page: . 0G/ @/2O15 4t01:32PK0 Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35700 6/18/2015 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 48143 001.032.000.543 PRINT SERVICES 191.14 Total : 191.14 35701 6/102015 000798 BUDINGER&ASSOCIATES INC S15093-2 310.000.215.594 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.798D5 Total : 2.796.05 35702 8/102015 001122 CAMERON-REILLY LLC PAY APP 4 383.303.140.595 0149-SIDEWALK INFILL PHASE 2 C 82.50 Total : 82.50 35703 6/18/2015 004354 COMMUNITY FORESTRY CONSULTANTS JUNE 2015 101.042.000.542 TREE SERVICES 244.58 Total : 244.58 35704 6/102015 002920 DIRECTV INC 25069812035 101D42.000.543 CABLE SERVICE MAINT SHOP 49.82 Total : 49.82 35705 6/18/2015 002385 DKS ASSOCIATES 57432 303.303.060.595 ARGONNECORRIDOR SIGNAL&D 532.59 Total : 532.59 35706 6/102015 000845 ECONORTHWEST 15793 001.058.058.558 PROFESSIONAL SERIVCES 7,423.75 Total : 7,423.75 35707 6/18/2015 000860 EVCO SOUND&ELECTRONICS 24562 001.032.000.543 TECHNICAL SERVICES 294.58 Total : 294.58 35708 6V18/2015 002507 FASTENERS INC S4301240.001 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 49.18 Total : 49.18 35709 6/102015 000186 FEDEX 5'062'03301 001.080.000.518 SHIPPING CHARGES 6.03 Total : 6.03 35710 6/18/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 125886 001.013.000.513 ADVERTISING 115.00 126176 001.013.000.513 ADVERTISING 92.00 43733 311800.220.585 LEGAL PUBLICATION 113.60 43846 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 54.40 43850 001.058.058.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 90.95 43851 001.058.058.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 97.75 43883 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 35.70 vchlist Voucher List Page: L 06/18/2015 4:01:32PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35710 6/18/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC (Continued) 43884 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 27.20 43885 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 28.90 43886 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.90 Total : 752.40 35711 6/18/2015 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL MAY15 1042 001.011.000.511 GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SERVIC 3,384.88 Total : 3,384.88 35712 6/18/2015 000007 GRAINGER 9756445210 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 7.41 Total : 7.41 35713 6/18/2015 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 294771 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 15.37 294772 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 7.45 295008 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS 245.39 295009 001.013.000.513 COPIER COSTS 17.54 295014 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS 124.07 295015 001.013.015.515 COPIER COSTS 6.67 295027 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 222.50 295028 001.058.050.558 COPIER COSTS 27.59 295031 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 105.49 295032 001.018.016.518 COPIER COSTS 26.51 295076 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 508.72 295077 001.076.000.576 COPIER COSTS 24.65 295100 001.058.057.558 COPIER COSTS 10.12 Total : 1,342.07 35714 6/18/2015 001728 HP FINANCIAL SERVICES CO 600454613 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572DD016:6/11-7/10/1E 745.84 600454614 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572E3651:6/11-7/10/15 830.28 600457135 001.090.000.548 SCHEDULE 572DA494: 5/19-6/18/1E 839.80 Total : 2,415.92 35715 6/18/2015 000864 JUB ENGINEERS INC. 0094497 101.042.000.542 2015 TIP MAINTENANCE&UPDATE 12,918.84 Total : 12,918.84 35716 6/18/2015 003959 MAX J KUNEY CO PAY APP 8 303.303.155.595 0155-SULLIVAN RD WEST BRIDGE 84,584.09 Total : 84,584.09 Page: ,,.2--" vchlist Voucher List Page: ''-'3- -- 06/18/2015 '3"�06/18/2015 4:01:32PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35717 6/18/2015 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 87925 402.402.000.594 VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN 15,546.27 Total : 15,546.27 35718 6/18/2015 000616 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER LEARNING 33875 001.013.000.513 MICROSOFT POWERPOINT; C. SIN 300.00 Total : 300.00 35719 6/18/2015 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 772664398001 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES: PARKS 134.71 772931318001 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 72.48 773365483001 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES: IT 195.59 774134863001 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 3.89 Total : 406.67 35720 6/18/2015 003653 PARTSMASTER 20897833 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 189.43 Total : 189.43 35721 6/18/2015 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS INC 27039 001.058.050.558 NAME PLATES 34.24 Total : 34.24 35722 6/18/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 6705043 101.042.000.542 ON-CALL EMERGENCY TRAFFIC C 423.93 Total : 423.93 35723 6/18/2015 000779 SOUTHARD, BRAD JUNE 2015 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL 955.00 Total : 955.00 35724 6/18/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 50312797 402.402.000.531 2014 LICENSED PICTOMETRY IMA( 10,522.45 Total : 10,522.45 35725 6/18/2015 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3267584478 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 38.17 3267584483 001.011.000.511 SUPPLIES CREDIT: COUNCIL -39.75 3267584498 001.011.000.511 SUPPLIES:COUNCIL 40.61 3267584501 001.011.000.511 SUPPLIES:COUNCIL 35.66 3267584504 001.011.000.511 SUPPLIES CREDIT: COUNCIL -40.34 3267584515 001.058.056.558 SUPPLIES: CD 124.44 3267584517 001.058.056.558 SUPPLIES:CD 81.75 Total : 240.54 35726 6/18/2015 004005 STONE CREEK LAND DESIGN&DEV PAY APP 5 309.000.176.595 0176 APPLEWAY TRAIL 2A CONSTF 154,441.48 Page: "' vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/18/2015 4:01:32PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35726 6/18/2015 004005 004005 STONE CREEK LAND DESIGN&DE' (Continued) Total : 154,441.48 35727 6/18/2015 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 426596 311.000.220.595 ADVERTISING ACCOUNT 42365 1,828.88 427229 001.058.056.558 ADVERTISING ACCOUNT 9013993 556.07 Total : 2,384.95 35728 6/18/2015 001660 TITAN TRUCK EQUIP CO INC 1103445 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 249.46 Total : 249.46 35729 6/18/2015 000723 US HEALTH WORKS 695-135497 101.042.000.542 PE-DOT PHYSICAL 94.00 Total : 94.00 35730 6/18/2015 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 006412 001.058.055.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 328.86 Total : 328.86 35731 6/18/2015 000676 WEST-THOMAS REUTERS 831931706 001.013.015.515 SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES 766.02 Total : 766.02 35732 6/18/2015 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC JUNE 2015 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICES 560.73 JUNE 2015 B 001.090.000.518 DARK FIBER LEASE 253.01 Total : 813.74 617150124 6/17/2015 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-66 001.016.000.521 CRY WOLF CHARGES 2,833.28 Total : 2,833.28 34 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 307,606.15 34 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 307,606.15 Page: "' . �� vchlist � Voucher � t Pogo ~1-- , 06/22/2015 8:54:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35733 6/22/2015 001081 ALSCO LSP01816000 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC 20.39 LSP01622783 001.018.000.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC 20.39 LSPO1828515 001.016.000.521 FLOOR MAT SERVICE AT PRECINC 20.39 Total : 61.17 35734 6/22/2015 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL LLC |NV011027 001.016.000.521 JANITORIAL SVCS: MAY 2015 2.501.87 Total : 2,501.87 35735 6/22/2015 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY June 2015 001.058.058.558 PETTY CASH: 12832,34,36,39,40,41 22.52 Total : 22.52 35736 6/22/2015 003500 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 115821 801.078.305.575 COFFEE SUPPLIES AT CENTERPL/ 179.11 Totai : 179.11 35737 6/22/2015 000007 GRAINGER 0750474968 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 199.37 Total : 195.37 35738 6/22/2015 003718 INLAND PUBLICATIONS INC 39347 001D78.301.571 ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE 400.00 Total : 400.00 35739 6/22/2015 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 May 2015 001.076.300.578 UTILITIES: PARKS 168.00 Total : 166.00 35740 6Q2/2015 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 860631 001876.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 158.04 888206 001.078.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 268.64 886207 001.078.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 138.06 888870 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 31.61 886876 001.078.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 62.16 890323 001.076.305.575 MONTHLY CLEANING AT CENTERP 7.136.00 Total : 7.793.41 35741 6822/2015 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO May 2015 001.076.302.576 UTILITIES: PARKS 3.294.58 May 2015 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: MAY 2015: PW 9.450.84 Total : 12.745.52 35742 6/22/2015 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC July 2015 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 35,511.52 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: C' --2- 06/2212015 8:54:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35742 6/22/2015 000193 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL I (Continued) Total : 35,511.52 35743 6/22/2015 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD&DRUG CENTER 03-315568 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 23.51 Total : 23.51 35744 6/22/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 6109055 001.076.300.576 CONTRACT MAINT: PARKS MAY 20 58,934.26 6656259 001.016.000.521 MONTHLY SERVICES AT PRECINC- 448.88 Total : 59,383.14 35745 6/22/2015 000323 SPOKANE CO UTILITIES June 2015 001.076.302.576 SPOKANE CO SEWER CHRGS:JUl 1,598.65 Total : 1,598.65 35746 6/22/2015 002301 SPOKANE RIVER FORUM 300 105.000.000.557 2015 LODGING TAX GRANT REIMB 463.19 Total : 463.19 35747 6/22/2015 001970 STADIUM SPORTS 48956 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES FOR SUMMER CAMP 1,766.52 Total : 1,766.52 35748 6/22/2015 001206 SWANSON'S REFRIGERATION&, RESTA 119884 001.076.305.575 WORK ORDER AND REPAIR ON O\ 543.46 Total : 543.46 35749 6/22/2015 001832 SWISHER 1052857 001.076.305.575 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CP 516.87 Total : 516.87 35750 6/22/2015 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 2296 309.000.203.594 0203-ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 1,829.60 Total : 1,829.60 35751 6/22/2015 000167 VERA WATER&POWER June 2015 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JUNE 2015 2,980.76 Total : 2,980.76 35752 6/22/2015 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 6124 105.000.000.557 2015 LODGING TAX REIMBURSEME 19,166.67 Total : 19,166.67 35753 6/22/2015 000787 WMS AQUATICS 17938 001.076.302.576 MISSION PARK POOL TANK PAINTI! 38,369.00 Total : 38,369.00 35754 6/22/2015 003128 YWCA OF SPOKANE 14855 001.090.000.560 2015 SOC SER GRANT REIMBURSI 199.16 Total : 199.16 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/22/2015 8:54:17AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 22 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 186,421.02 22 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 186,421.02 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: „3--` f6) vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/22/2015 10:49:32AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5163 6/19/2015 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben61433 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE: PAYMEN1 1,161.67 Total : 1,161.67 5172 6/19/2015 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLi Ben61435 001.231.14.00 401A: PAYMENT 32,398.22 Total : 32,398.22 5173 6/19/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben61437 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES: PAYMENT 34,892.25 Total : 34,892.25 5175 6/19/2015 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,4E. Ben61439 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION: I 7,836.20 Total : 7,836.20 5176 6/19/2015 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EX Ben61441 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN: PAYMENT 1,172.35 Total : 1,172.35 5 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 77,460.69 5 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 77,460.69 Page: --1'.'-- - // // vchlist Voucher List Page: ~-I- 06/26/2015 12:52:27P&0 Spokane Valley Bank code : ph-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6184 6/26/2015 004385 AINUU,ALMAZ PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT FIRESIDE LOW 149.50 Total : 149.50 6185 6/26/2015 004389 BIPPES,AMY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.09 REFUND SUMMER CAMP 214.00 Total : 214.00 6186 6/26/2015 002982 BOREN, CHARLES PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.09 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6187 6/26/2015 003402 BREBNER, GRETCHEN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 52.00 Total : 52.00 6188 6/26Q015 004303 8ROVVN, PHYLLIS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.90 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 lotml : 52.00 6189 6/26/2015 004399 CONDON, BRITTANI PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 87.00 Total : 87.00 6190 6/26/2015 004397 (]OOFREY. KAR| PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSITTERRACE VIE 52.00 Total : 52.00 6191 6/26/2015 004388 GRAY, ROBIN PARKS REFUND 001.227.10.89 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 6192 6/28/2015 004388 JEWELL,KARIN PARKS REFUND 001.23710.89 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 6193 6/26/I015 004395 JONES,CHAUNCEY PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6194 6/26/2015 004396 LINCOLN, DELPHINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52l0 Total : 52.00 6195 6/26/2015 004400 MOUNT,TAMARA PARKS REFUND 001.23710.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 52.00 Total : 52.00 6196 6Q6/2015 004401 PAINTER, STACY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 52.00 /2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/26/2015 12:52:27PM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6196 6/26/2015 004401 004401 PAINTER,STACY (Continued) Total : 52.00 6197 6/26/2015 004387 PAYNE WEST INSURANCE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT AUDITORIUM 52.00 Total : 52.00 6198 6/26/2015 004391 RACE-2-PLACE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 257.00 Total : 257.00 6199 6/26/2015 004398 SCHWEDLAND,TIM PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT TERRACE VIEN 52.00 Total : 52.00 6200 6/26/2015 004392 SCOTT, BEVERLY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREENACRES 220.00 Total : 220.00 6201 6/26/2015 004390 SHELFFO, SIDNEY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 6202 6/26/2015 000337 UPS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MEETING ROOT 52.00 Total : 52.00 6203 6/26/2015 002412 VALLEY ASSEMBLY OF GOD PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 6204 6/26/2015 004394 WARREN, NICOLE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU SPF 52.00 Total : 52.00 21 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 2,075.50 21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 2,075.50 Page: /3 fi vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/29/2015 10:14:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35755 6/29/2015 000921 ATO Z RENTAL&SALES INC 208130-1 101.043.000.542 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 390.55 Total : 390.55 35756 6/29/2015 004379 AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYS CSV REFUND 001.000.000.321 CSV ENDORSEMENT REFUND 13.00 Total : 13.00 35757 6/29/2015 003076 AMSDEN, ERICA EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 33.98 Total : 33.98 35758 6/29/2015 000030 AVISTA JUNE 2015 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW MASTER AVISTA 26,148.60 MAY 2015 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES: PARKS MASTER AVISTA 7,887.23 Total : 34,035.83 35759 6/29/2015 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9651615 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY CEN 455.37 S0110655 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY CEN 213.66 Total : 669.03 35760 6/29/2015 000572 CARTER, CAROL EXPENSE 001.076.305.575 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 224.08 Total : 224.08 35761 6/29/2015 000101 CDW-G WF58705 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES: IT 301.86 Total : 301.86 35762 6/29/2015 000322 CENTURYLINK JUNE 2015 001.076.000.576 2015 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14• 493.17 Total : 493.17 35763 6/29/2015 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 570646 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENTAL 206.07 Total : 206.07 35764 6/29/2015 000235 DB SECURE SHRED 2721062215 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 186.30 Total : 186.30 35765 6/29/2015 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE 46 JG6362 L015 303.303.155.595 ITS/SIGNAL/MAINT PROJECTS 655.26 RE-313-ATB50616055 101.042.000.542 STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINT 9,942.22 RE-313-ATB50616056 101.042.000.542 SIGNAL&ILLUMINATION 18,054.70 Total : 28,652.18 Page: '"- (L vchlist Voucher List Page: `2 06/29/2015 10:14:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35766 6/29/2015 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST JUNE 2015 001.076.305.575 ADVERTISING FOR CENTER PLAC 239.04 JUNE 2015 001.076.304.575 ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR CENTE 40.00 Total : 279.04 35767 6/29/2015 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 0515-0464 303.303.166.595 0166-PINES RD&GRACE AVE IN1 612.18 Total : 612.18 35768 6/29/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43818 311.000.218.595 LEGAL PUBLICATION 115.20 43879 303.303.156.595 LEGAL PUBLICATION 116.80 43920 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 128.00 43921 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.90 43922 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 77.35 43924 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 94.35 Total : 628.60 35769 6/29/2015 004325 FRONTIER TREE SERVICE JUNE 2015 101.043.000.542 TREE REMOVAL 1,630.50 Total : 1,630.50 35770 6/29/2015 000007 GRAINGER 9761122804 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 41.94 9761551184 001.032.000.543 CREDIT SUPPLIES: PW -33.13 9762258391 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 4.07 9762258409 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 92.61 9762258417 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 25.96 9764798584 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 53.58 9764798592 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 50.19 9764798600 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 37.44 9768177306 402.402.000.531 SUPPLIES: PW 47.98 Total : 320.64 35771 6/29/2015 002568 GRANICUS INC 65562 001.011.000.511 MAINTENANCE FOR JULY 719.59 Total : 719.59 35772 6/29/2015 001944 LANCER LTD 0453377 001.058.050.558 BUSINESS CARDS 136.13 0453378 001.058.056.558 BUSINESS CARDS 37.23 0453415 001.090.000.519 ENVELOPES 345.13 Total : 518.49 35773 6/29/2015 004402 LAUBER,JESSICA EXPENSE 001.076.301.571 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 37.26 Page: ` ~-~ /�� vchlist Voucher List Page: `-3 06/29/2015 10:14:16AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35773 6/29/2015 004402 004402 LAUBER,JESSICA (Continued) Total : 37.26 35774 6/29/2015 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT MAY 2015 001.076.305.575 OPERATING SUPPLIES:CP/PRECI 338.60 Total : 333.60 35775 6/29/2015 003958 MAX JKUNEYCO PAY APP 0 303.303.155.585 0155'SULLIVAN RDWEST BRIDGE 281.875.80 Total : 281.875.80 35776 6/202015 003596 MESSNER,SEAN EXPENSE 101.842.000.542 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 78.71 EXPENSE 101.043.000.542 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 30.00 Totai : 108.71 35777 6/29/2015 004272 MOMENTUM INK LLC 4450 001.018.018.518 WELLNESS CAMPAIGN T-SHIRTS 643.50 Total : 643.50 35778 6/29/2015 000862 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 87686 403.000.187.595 PROJECT SIGN 815.25 Total : 815.25 35779 6/29/2015 001844 NIMRI, RABA EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 16.33 Total : 16.33 35780 6/29C2015 003000 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 62848 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 26.08 Total : 28.06 35781 6829/2015 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 774136333001 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES: PARKS 18.51 775131073001 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 22.95 775132277001 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 58.31 775139190001 001.078.301.571 SUPPLIES: PARKS 28.57 775870239801 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES:GENERAL 18.59 778042108001 001.013815.515 SUPPLIES: LEGAL 8.23 Total : 155.16 35782 6/202015 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER MAY 2015 001.016.000.588 STATE REMITTANCE 40,338.97 Total : 40.338.97 35783 6Q02015 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVE NG INC. 44476 101.042.000.542 2015 STREET AND STORMWATER 101.800.38 Total : 101,800.36 vchlist Voucher List /'' ' Page: ---#-" 06/29/2015 10:14:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35784 6/29/2015 002510 POHL SPRING WORKS INC 165625 101.000.000.542 5-203:SERVICE 111.96 Total : 111.96 35785 6/29/2015 000019 PURFECT LOGOS LLC 41842 309.000.176.595 BANNERS 288.06 41892 309.000.176.595 ART APPLICATION 190.23 Total : 478.29 35786 6/29/2015 000256 RAINBOW ELECTRIC INC 379494 001.090.000.518 JOURNEYMAN ELECTRICAL SERF 547.88 Total : 547.88 35787 6/29/2015 000090 SPOKANE CO INFO SYSTEMS 50312811 001.018.013.513 COUNTY IT SUPPORT MAY 2015 12,567.46 Total : 12,567.46 35788 6/29/2015 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY MAY 2015 001.016.000.586 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 642.42 Total : 642.42 35789 6/29/2015 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 JUNE 2015 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 989.48 JUNE 2015 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 456.60 Total : 1,446.08 35790 6/29/2015 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 456184 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 28.66 Total : 28.66 35791 6/29/2015 000898 SPOKANE PROCARE INC 483795 402.402.000.531 2015 ROADSIDE WEEDSPRAYING 2,771.43 Total : 2,771.43 35792 6/29/2015 001903 SPOKANE TRAFFIC CONTROL INC 1238 101.042.000.542 FLAGGING SERVICES 241.25 1252 101.042.000.542 FLAGGING SERVICES 1,388.00 Total : 1,629.25 35793 6/29/2015 000404 SPOKANE VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM 15-31 309.000.176.595 ARCHIVE IMAGES FOR APPLEWAY 81.45 Total : 81.45 35794 6/29/2015 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 53209 001.016.000.521 MAY 2015 MONTHLY MAINTENANC 605.46 Total : 605.46 35795 6/29/2015 001875 STRATA INCORPORATED SP150121-IN 309.000.176.595 APPLEWAY TRAIL PROJECT 328.00 Page: '---------4 vchlist Voucher List /2Page: 06/29/2015 10:14:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35795 6/29/2015 001875 001875 STRATA INCORPORATED (Continued) Total : 328.00 35796 6/29/2015 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 875535 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION 15.20 875607 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION 132.50 Total : 147.70 35797 6/29/2015 002092 THOMPSON, CHRIS EXPENSE 001.018.013.513 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 12.36 Total : 12.36 35798 6/29/2015 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080036337 101.042.000.542 5-201:SERVICE 120.60 Total : 120.60 35799 6/29/2015 001464 TW TELECOM 07480489 001.076.305.575 INTERNET AND PHONE 1,247.45 Total : 1,247.45 35800 6/29/2015 003135 UNITED RENTALS,(NORTH AMERICA)IN 129165535-001 101.043.000.542 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 109.00 Total : 109.00 35801 6/29/2015 000295 VALLEYFEST SEPTEMBER 2015 001.018.013.513 BOOTH RENTAL FOR VALLEYFEST 70.00 Total : 70.00 35802 6/29/2015 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN LLP 119270 001.058.099.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,323.29 120156 001.058.099.558 COMP PLAN UPDATES 18,972.18 Total : 41,295.47 35803 6/29/2015 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD 46281 311.000.188.595 POSTAGE SERVICES 272.58 46321 101.043.000.542 POSTAGE SERVICES 549.80 Total : 822.38 35804 6/29/2015 002363 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO PC060808982 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES:PW 6.71 Total : 6.71 35805 6/29/2015 000980 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC 0000027572 303.303.060.595 KNOX&ARGONNE 17,460.70 Total : 17,460.70 35806 6/29/2015 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW 2015 001.076.302.576 OPERATATING EXPENSE AND MAN 18,603.00 Total : 18,603.00 Page: 5'"-- ,off' vchlist Voucher List Page: --6- 06/29/2015 10:14:15AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 52 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 577,199.80 52 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 577,199.80 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: 6'� , /?' vchlist Voucher List Page: -1----' 07/01/2015 12:55:55PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35807 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8565 June 2015 001.018.014.514 NAT'L SEMINARS GROUP 299.00 8565 June 2015 101.042.000.542 WASHINGTON SECTION ITE 85.00 8565 June 2015 101.043.000.542 NORTH 40 OUTFITTERS 73.71 8565 June 2015 001.016.000.521 AMAZON.COM 1,259.99 8565 June 2015 001.032.000.543 BEST BUY 141.30 8565 June 2015 001.032.000.543 THE HOME DEPOT 52.96 8565 June 2015 001.090.000.518 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 499.00 Total : 2,410.96 35808 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 5214 June 2015 001.013.000.513 MARRIOTT 1,132.39 5214 June 2015 101.042.000.542 TRAVELOCITY 208.98 5214 June 2015 101.042.000.542 ALASKA AIRLINES 202.20 5214 June 2015 001.032.000.543 HAMPTON INN&SUITES 153.87 Total : 1,697.44 35809 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8573 June 2015 001.090.000.518 NETWORKING SOLUTIONS 659.80 8573 June 2015 001.032.000.543 RITE IN THE RAIN 249.96 8573 June 2015 101.042.000.542 LAS VEGAS LAC 520.00 Total : 1,429.76 35810 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8599 June 2015 105.000.000.557 WSAE 510.00 8599 June 2015 105.000.000.557 WSAE 300.00 8599 June 2015 001.076.305.575 POST FALLS CHAMBER OF COMMI 15.00 8599 June 2015 001.076.305.575 WAL-MART 18.13 8599 June 2015 001.076.305.575 MICHAELS STORES 26.07 8599 June 2015 001.076.301.571 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 410.39 8599 June 2015 001.076.305.575 ACE HARDWARE 83.73 8599 June 2015 001.076.301.571 S&S WORLDWIDE 124.99 8599 June 2015 001.076.305.575 DELTA AIRLINES 25.00 8599 June 2015 001.076.301.571 CARTER COMMUNICATIONS(KEK) 102.09 Total : 1,615.40 35811 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8581 June 2015 001.058.055.558 BUYROLLS.COM 231.60 8581 June 2015 001.058.051.558 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 5.95 8581 June 2015 001.058.051.558 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 49.00 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: 07/01/2015 12:55:55PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35811 7/1/2015 001606 001606 BANNER BANK (Continued) Total : 286.55 35812 7/1/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8557 June 2015 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP 32.61 8557 June 2015 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP 25.00 8557 June 2015 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP 25.00 Total : 82.61 6 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 7,522.72 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 7,522.72 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: .-2--- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending June 30, 2015 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 299,652.41 $ 5,850.00 $305,502.41 Benefits: $ 153,003.31 $ 11,430.66 $164,433.97 Total payroll $ 452,655.72 $ 17,280.66 $469,936.38 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL City Council Chambers 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley,Washington June 16,2014 8:30 a.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Rod Higgins, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Ed Pace,Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Ben Wick, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director Bill Gothmann,Councilmember Pro Tem Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Chelsie Taylor,Interim Finance Director Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst John Whitehead,Human Resources Manager Raba Nimri,Budget Analyst Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present. Mayor Grafos welcomed everyone to the meeting and turned the meeting over to City Manager Jackson. Welcome and Overview: City Manager Jackson explained that this is the sixth year we have conducted the budget workshop as a means to check-in with Council on our budget.He said typically the City Manager objectives and Council objectives are well aligned. Mr. Jackson said that we will discuss the financial objectives in the back of the notebook, but right now, he directed attention to page 5 in the Business Plan and then briefly discussed the fiscal policies including Financial Management Proposals and Financial Objectives. He said that these objectives have been in place with minor changes for the last six years and are subject to change by Council. He also mentioned that we try not to duplicate services provided by others within the community, like the sport programs offered by the County. Concerning the figures in today's materials, Mr. Jackson said we continue to find corrections so please consider this a draft document. He also mentioned that there was Council discussion back in 2010 about not accepting grant funds,but they are an important part of the financial objectives of our City; said we have received over $54 million in federal dollars since our incorporation, and rhetorically asked everyone to imagine what our infrastructure might look like without those federal grant dollars. Said we currently use only 1.3% of our City's allowable debt capacity, and more importantly, 6.02% of non-voted bond capacity. Said of the six goals listed on page 5, the last goal to "strive to prioritize spending in the annual budget process and minimize mid-year addition of projects and appropriations" was just added last year. Said that if we have things that come up mid- year, as much as possible we try to hold onto those until the following year, but yet we realize there are some things that are beyond our control. Looking at the ending fund balance as noted on page 6 of the Business Plan, Mr. Jackson said we have agreed to maintain a minimum general fund ending balance of 50% of recurring expenditures, and agreed that the Service Level Stabilization Reserve Fund will not drop below $3.24 million, or 60% of $5.4 million. Mr. Jackson said already accounted for in next year's budget, is not to take the 1% property tax Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 1 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT increase permitted by law,but we do include new construction,which usually amounts to about$200,000 in taxes; said unless the tax rate is increased, the rate doesn't increase to the City, but as we grow and flourish, we will be bringing in additional sales tax; said our objective is to grow the economy. Financially, he said, we have been successful to-date, but we will have some challenges, like the street fund maintenance; the gas tax remains flat as there hasn't been a lot of growth because of the efficiency of the automobile, and that perhaps people are driving slightly less; said we might reconsider the telephone utility tax,which was originally a temporary tax,but has been the platform of our street fund and without it, it would be very difficult to maintain the streets, and he noted that the funds we see now are less than when we first started, as people cancel their landlines with the extended use of cell phones. Mr. Jackson said we are fairly financially secure through 2017, but then we will start to depend heavily on our reserves,which means we will have to examine the street fund revenues within the next couple of years. Mr. Jackson mentioned the purpose of REET funds; said we have some exciting projects such as the Appleway Trail and Balfour Park; that the trail will require some funding agencies to be willing to work with us to reallocate some of the money for various sections of the trail; and for the park, we have no money set aside now,but,he said,we knew that when we purchased the property, and said we don't know what will happen with the library ballot issue,but if that is successful, we will want to develop that park. Mr. Jackson said those basic philosophies haven't changed much; and said that we have a razor-thin margin between revenues and expenditures for 2016,which is fine and we will meet the 50%ending fund balance objective. He said if we discover we have a strong need, we could spend money but we are not trying to increase reserves. In examining this budget, he said, it is important to consider that we have added some programs,plus two police officers, and the Appleway Trail which will require maintenance; we have also added stormwater swales and landscape improvement, but we bring those issues to Council before the projects are approved; also upcoming is not only funding a new city hall but funding its operation and maintenance. Mr. Jackson noted that if there are expenditures in the budget that Council disagrees with,it doesn't mean we can't reallocate those. Moving to page 79 of the Business Plan, Mr. Jackson went over the Community and Economic Development Performance Measures,particularly the permit valuation over the years 2009 through 2014, and that upon examination of the data, said we are able to draw some correlations between the data and what's happening in the community. Director Hohman explained that we have seen a slow upward trend with the permits, from just under 3,000 permits in 2009, to almost 4,000 last year; he mentioned that so far this year we have seen increasing numbers of residential permits, which we haven't seen in a lot of years; said the commercial activity tailored off a little although we are looking at some large projects; and mentioned that the figures in the permit valuation indicate the community's willingness to invest in their community. Councilmember Pace mentioned a goal of weaning ourselves from needing grants; said they are great, but when it comes from the federal government, they are deeply in debt; and the state can't balance their budget; said he realizes it is hard work to write and receive grants. Councilmember Hafner also suggested keeping in mind we don't want to turn away from grants if they are needed for the project; while Mayor Grafos added that the project can't be driven by the grants, that each project's priority must be determined and each project has ongoing maintenance costs; said he doesn't want to "chase the grants" but said the grants are a good deal and we like all the funds we can get. Councilmember Hafner said that if we were to receive grants for Bridging the Valley,he thinks we'd accept them. Mr. Jackson said that the plan for today is to go through the budget in the workbook, to discuss Council goals for 2016, and end with brainstorming; said this is a workshop setting and he encouraged questions throughout the day; said the pages are similar to what was done in the past showing several years of history, and that every department also undertook an exercise of projecting what would occur with a 3, 6, and 9% reduction; said we have not had to make those reductions, but this gives good insight into what departments feel would have to be reduced, or what we could live without, and is a good discussion and budget preparation activity. Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 2 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT Preview of workshop: Interim Finance Director Taylor gave an overview of the General Fund budget figures, noted department changes from 2015-2016, and explained that departments were asked to maintain the 1% cost increase; she noted under recurring costs that revenues slightly exceed expenditures; and the overall deficit of total revenues compared with total expenditures is $356,880 and mentioned the need for a future 2015 budget amendment to address some of the nonrecurring expenditures; and once all the adjustments have been made, said we would have a 53.44% ending fund balance. Mr. Jackson said this was planned when we reduced the ending fund balance last time; he reminded everyone that this is not a spending plan and we do not spend every dollar we receive. When asked about the CAD (computer- aided dispatch) costs, Mr. Jackson said the County is putting in that system and have allocated part of their cost to us, to be paid over the two years of the acquisition of the software, and a contract will be forthcoming and part of the issue continues to be debated as the County proposes to start charging us for the new software that will have to be replaced in fifteen years, which would mean we would pay for the service citizens are using now even though we don't know the needs of the future years, and that this will come before Council later. Mr. Calhoun said what was adopted back in November continues to evolve and that Ms. Taylor will give Council an administrative report this September on all the proposed budget amendments. Ms. Taylor went over the revenue projections for 2016,the new property tax figures and actual 2015 levy amount, along with the estimated $200,000 for new construction, all assuming we are not taking the 1% property tax increase; she moved through the sales tax revenue estimates for 2016; mentioned the gambling tax drop which is related to the tax rate change on the card games,which she said amounts to an estimated $180,000 yearly reduction; said state shared revenues are projected at 2015 levels as we wait for the state budget; and said we hope to get an update late July or early August. It was also mentioned that all general revenues are subject to change as we get more information, and that most line item revenues are projected on a six-year history.Ms. Taylor went over the General Fund Department Changes noting the declining utility tax, and gave a brief explanation of the figures included on the Stormwater Fund 402 sheet. Tab #1: Legislative: In highlighting the changes, Mr. Jackson noted the state lobbyist cost could be slightly more in 2016; that although we hired Travis Lumpkin as our federal lobbyist last year, he was subsequently hired by Maria Cantwell; said he met with two members of Ms. Cantwell's staff yesterday and discussed economic development. Mr. Jackson said the plan is to submit a TIGER Grant application in June of next year for the sewer costs for Tschirley Road; and reiterated that the budget is not a spending plan and it is okay to put in funds and not use them; said our primary interest with the federal government is in financial support as not so much on the laws they are passing; mentioned that our local representatives for the federal system are very helpful; said he wasn't going to send out an immediate RFP (request for proposal) for a lobbyist, and asked Council for their input. Mayor Grafos said there is always an opportunity for a lobbyist and wants to continue as we have in the past; and Councilmember Pace questioned if we are keeping track of our spending for a lobbyist, and whether we are getting any funding from the federal government. Mr. Jackson said it could take a long time to see a cause and effect,but that part of our objective is to be more engaged at the federal level; said we are proposing funding for trips to Washington, D.C., as well as Olympia; and that those trips have paid off in Olympia as we work to keep our items alive and progressing. Mr. Jackson also noted there has been a reduction in the cost over the year for broadcasting our Council meetings. Concerning Council travel, Councilmember Gothmann said since he is temporary, perhaps it would not be a good use of money to send him on trips or to conventions, such as the NLC (National League of Cities), and Councilmember Pace said the easy answer to that is, to just not go, and suggested the control is up to Mr. Gothmann. Councilmember Pace also noted that he previously tried to shift some travel funds to Mr. Hohman's department so staff could attend the AWC and/or NLC conferences, and based on his last involvement at those conventions, feels it was a waste of taxpayer dollars and he won't attend again. Mr. Jackson also noted that if Councilmembers want to attend, the matter can be brought to the City's Finance Committee for a decision. There was some additional discussion about travel and cost,whether it is better to send Council or staff,that it depends on where the meeting or conventions are and the topic, and that even if we are unable to meet with federal Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 3 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT officials, those officials pay attention to what their staff says, and so we gain recognition; GSI's (Greater Spokane, Inc.) presence at meetings was also mentioned. Councilmember Pace suggested in the interest of being efficient,that we limit Councilmember trips to one a year and that we can learn without going on a"boondoggle" adding that if someone travels, a report should be made back to council on at least certain aspects of that trip.Mr. Jackson said we can talk about the manager's cost and then come back to this later to determine whether we want to make a reduction in the budget. Tab #2: General Government: Mr. Calhoun explained some of the figures on the three spreadsheets; said we might have to extend our City Hall lease as it is will expire March 30, 2017; that we are setting aside funds in the general fund to cover the excess; mentioned the bond payment is about $70,000 more than the lease; mentioned the funding proposed for outside agencies of$110,000 with a separate $40,000 that would be at the City Manager's discretion for specific economic development purposes; said that Mr. Jackson has had preliminary discussions on this and it is progressing slowly as we want to have a measurable scope of work with whatever economic development agency we choose to work with. Councilmember Pace asked what do the taxpayers get for the $117,000 fee for the Spokane County Air Pollution Authority, and Mr. Calhoun replied that this is our portion of the cost, which is established by the state and handled through the County; and Mr. Calhoun said he will do some research about how this is set up and regulated. Mr. Calhoun went through the capital outlays, and said we always make sure pavement preservation figures evolve as the budget evolves; said we plan to spend a modest amount of funds to improve the twelve-year old speakers in the Council Chambers, and to add some acoustic panels. Councilmember Wick suggested we look at the idea of someone hosting our website, and Mr. Calhoun explained that our website is hosted by Qscend and that we can discuss later about how that works. Tab #3: City Manager and City Clerk: Mr. Jackson said his fund includes the City Manager, City Clerk, Deputy City Clerk, Council's Administrative Assistant and the Assistant to the City Manager; that the changes to wages and benefits track to the existing policy with a maximum of 4%, as outlined in our labor contract; said health care and PERS are calculated with Human Resources and Finance; said these figures are pretty static with a slight increase for travel and mileage, and includes figures for professional service consultants,bond counsel, and other kinds of personal services we might need to contract for; and includes services for Code Publishing for handling our Comprehensive Plan as we elected to have it published to our website, which works well, and is always up-to-date. Mr. Jackson mentioned the travel figures, that we don't have a per diem but reimburse for receipts of actual meals; said he feels the figures are pretty close based on actual receipts, and asked Council if they would like to discuss the two trips a year for the City Manager, and Councilmember Pace said he trusts Mr. Jackson's judgment. Mr. Jackson briefly discussed some of the past trips and meetings with Senators Murray and Cantwell, and of opportunities to discuss Bridging the Valley; said such meetings are beneficial although sometimes such benefits are intangible. Mayor Grafos said he feels the money is well spent and we need to "be at the table" and like advertising,have to be consistent in order to get results; said people are talking about how different we are from other cities; and this is a positive benefit and should be a priority; said he attended a GSI meeting yesterday and received two compliments about what we are doing, and that it's the old "squeaky wheel" that pays off. Councilmember Hafner agreed and said relationships are important and the federal and state government must know about our needs. Deputy Mayor Woodard suggested we might want to change the process and have funds for Council trips used every other year; but for the most part, said it is a good starting point. Mr. Jackson asked if Council agrees with the budget and of sharing the travel expenses as it is or wants to revisit the issue. Councilmember Hafner said he trusts each Councilmember on how they spend the funds, and Councilmember Wick and Mayor Grafos agreed. Council took a quick recess at 10:10 a.m. Mayor Grafos reconvened the meeting the 10:24 a.m. Tab #4: City Attorney/Legal Support: City Attorney Driskell went over the figures for legal support, and said that these are mostly stable and reflect business as usual. Tab #5: Operations and Administrative Services: Mr. Calhoun explained that this section of the budget increased overall by 3.2%, but the nonpayroll cost was actually down by about $10,000; said this Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 4 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT department includes six FTEs (full-time equivalent) plus a PIO (public information officer) intern; said this shows a decrease for the city-wide survey as that is only conducted every other year;that the $18,000 in public information includes all the Hot Topics printing and one, city-wide mailing. Councilmember Pace suggested increasing the spending as a means of keeping citizens engaged, and said he feels it is worth doing a $30,000 mailing four times a year to all households and businesses. Mr. Jackson said he would take that under consideration. Deputy Mayor Woodard said he feels this is still a lot of"bang for the buck;" that we could see what response we get from doing the full mailing a couple of times to help determine whether it is worth four times a year; and Councilmember Hafner suggested looking at the content to see if it is relevant and make the decision at that time. Mr. Jackson said he will come back with a proposal. Tab #6: Finance and Information Technology (IT): Ms. Taylor reported that this shows an overall increase of 4.15% which is primarily related to payroll; and that overall the nonpayroll figure is down slightly by$96.00; and that there have been no major changes from 2015. Mr. Calhoun explained that the bond counsel figures were for the compliance consultation related to the previous bond. Tab #7: Human Resources: Mr. Whitehead said there have been no major changes and the figures are pretty straight-forward; and he went over the highlights of the spreadsheet; said there was a reduction in legal due to an anticipated lack of need for 2016; that the professional services includes background checks and physicals for prospective candidates for employment; that as the economy gets better, it is more difficult to recruit employees so we are spending a little more for advertising; and he noted we have had some staff move from our organization. Mr. Jackson said over the last several months we lost three engineers,plus one from the year before, all to the City of Spokane; said Spokane is gearing up for major construction and their staff positions are attractive to some of our people as a means to move to a position with a better career path and higher wage. Mr. Whitehead spoke of costs associated with safety-related training, the reduction in health care costs as part of the Wellness Program; and that staff might be bringing forward a position title change in the future to have the duties more accurately reflect the position, although there would be no fiscal impact. Mr. Jackson said members of the Finance Committee remember the discussion about the concept of instead of raising the pay in the matrix, to provide the opportunity for the City Manager to increase the salary on a temporary or ongoing basis for someone who steps far outside their responsibilities and takes on additional duties; said part of the struggle we face is while we work so hard to keep the number of staff low, employees want to move forward and we want them to,but employees can see there is a plateau, so it is difficult to keep creating opportunities at the top end; that we will always have some turnover, but one of the tools we use is to add a statement to the matrix giving the City Manager some discretion if someone does an exceptional job, as we don't want to create a new position but do want to compensate them for those additional duties; so something like that might come forward as a proposal in the final budget; but if so, he said it will be discussed beforehand with the Finance Committee. Mayor Grafos suggested we have a spreadsheet that examines our positions compared with those at the City of Spokane and Spokane County to give an overall view of where we are. Mr. Jackson agreed; and also noted that our biggest investment should be our mobile app and website which is a tool people use to make decisions about where to go, which lead to a brief discussion about social media. Tab #8: Public Works: Mr. Guth went over the figures covering the general, street and stormwater funds; said the total increase is 4.88% but removing payroll shows the increase at 3.38%; mentioned that he has worked with finance on the vehicle replacement fund,which is putting money away annually to re- examine how we do our vehicle replacement; said those numbers went up fairly significantly and said his department has the largest fleet; so removing those figures leaves his department with a 1% increase. He explained some of the items which are different from those in 2015, such as small tools and minor equipment, and that they are looking at a three-year history to determine if they have the right figures; he spoke of other services and charges such as our GIS (geographic information system) Contract with Spokane County, which includes some mapping services as well as GIS licenses; said his entire department includes ten FTEs. He spoke of the aerial photography cost which was previously discussed Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 5 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT with Council; and said this will give us more accurate information, and said we share those costs with Community Development. Mr. Guth also spoke of the added funds for conference registration,which is a result of additional solid waste programs, which is part of the CDBG (Community Development Block Grant); that the majority of the cost is borne by the grant but this would be matching funds to attend training. He noted that vehicle replacement increase is a result of a recalibration of the cost for replacing vehicles. Councilmember Hafner asked about fuel cost and Mr. Guth replied that the figures are an estimate since it is difficult to predict what will happen with the cost of fuel, so he looks at the historical figures; said the cost did increase in 2015 because of adding a vehicle at the end of 2014. Concerning the street fund, with seven FTE's, Mr. Guth said they have been challenged with some declining revenues due to the phone tax, which has decreased by $750,000 since 2010 and which has resulted working through a budget shortfall for 2016 of$611,719. Mr. Guth said he has worked with the finance management team in working through some of the options of how to tackle that shortfall. After briefmg Council on some of the figures on the street fund spreadsheet,Mr. Guth noted that the temporary city drivers' cost figures were taken out of the Poe contract figures; he said over the winter, many of the Poe Contractors are laid off and if they work for us, they don't get their unemployment; said we are having problems getting drivers and the solution is to look at temporary drivers; and said this would supplement what they were doing if working; or we could hire quasi-retirees; and said they are still working through the program. Mr. Guth mentioned that we did not get a lot of snow last year so we were able to conduct some training; said the deduction of the $20,000 from the Poe Contract is added here so those figures (the previous $20,000 deduction from the Poe Contract) is accounted for here; with a net effect of $60,000 less than 2015. Councilmember Pace asked about SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) membership, and Mr. Guth explained that the $18,000 is the amount of dues it takes to be a member of SRTC, and on top of that there is $15,000 for the SRTMC traffic management system, which together totals $33,000; Mr. Guth said the other figures shown represent engineers' continuing education, which is a two-year re-certification program. Concerning SRTMC, if we are not members, Mr. Guth said we could not receive any grants or receive the benefits of planning and funding that goes through them. Mayor Grafos asked how many lights we have and how they are paid for and whether we could work with them over time to reduce these costs.Mr. Guth explained that we have about one or two hundred lights, and the rest belong to Avista, Modern, or Vera; that we pay for the electricity and some operation and maintenance, like painting and/or changing bulbs, cleaning lenses; and that all those figures are built into the cost we pay them. Concerning LED lights,Mr. Guth said that SRTMC also seeks grants for retrofits and we would have to research to see if their grant plan includes Spokane Valley. Mayor Grafos suggested perhaps we could participate and upgrade the lights and get better looking streets; and Mr. Guth replied that he would have to research that; that he has had some vendors contact him in the past who are interested in what we are doing. Mr. Guth explained that the $150,000 bridge maintenance is for Fancher Bridge; that a center joint has opened on the bridge, which is a serious issue and needs to be addressed; he said we can't put a quick fix on that any further; that they had applied for a grant in 2015 through SRTC of$40,000,but did not score well and therefore, did not get the grant; said this needs to be fixed and he feels we can't postpone it any longer. Concerning snow operations, the decrease includes the $20,000 credit from the Poe contract as mentioned earlier; he also noted that part of the budget reduction,the $70,000, is for a full city plow with motor graders; said they have accounted for a snowplow in the emergency fund, but would need to replenish that fund in the future if it is used, so this could be seen as a one-time reduction. Under the intergovernmental services, Mr. Guth explained this mostly concerns street maintenance performed by the County and includes traffic signs, signals and markings the County does for us; he mentioned that some of the signals have been in the ground for over eighty years and need to be upgraded as technology changes we can't support the old technology; he said the net change result is a $23,000 decrease.Mr. Jackson said we could potentially require additional funding for the street fund but we don't need it yet as we work hard to reduce expenses; he noted a big shift to take up preservation costs through the REET funds; said we can do that for a while but not in the long term; said we also typically budget for Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 6 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT moderate to heavy snow fall,but if we have to dip into that for snow plowing, something else will have to be tightened up. Moving to the stormwater fund, Mr. Guth explained that this includes three FTEs; the costs include sharing the backhoe with the street department with a full time inspector who works out of the shop and who needs his own pickup truck. Mr. Guth went through the other figures including GIS mapping costs, stormwater needs relating to structures and database; professional services; and the private stormwater maintenance with Poe Contractors. There was also brief discussion concerning the decant facility and associated cost savings as we share the facility with WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation); and that once we get through a full year, we will be in a better position to know our actual facility costs. The Mayor called for a recess for lunch at 11:45.He reconvened the meeting at 12:35 p.m. Tab #9 Public Safety: Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that the non-departmental figures are primarily fines and fees from district court which are mostly passed on to the State; he noted the decreasing revenue trend,which he said was expected with the traffic school participation starting late 2011;the District Court fee reduction is a coding change for fees labeled "deferred findings" with 44%of those fees now going to the State; said he is hoping to see the start of the pre-trial diversion program for DWLS3 (driving while license suspended) charges; which program is designed to get people back on track with a payment plan. Mr. Koudelka also mentioned the maintenance of the precinct building showing a small increase over the last few years. Concerning Crywolf, Chief VanLeuven said he feels this has been a beneficial program. Mr. Jackson said that staff routinely gets inquires about people sending their payments out of town,or someone with having a perfect record gets a false alarm; and said those are things we can look at; or if preferred, we could start on a RFP process, and whether such would be sent out this year or not,we could start with a discussion that Crywolf has been successful in reducing alarms as well as notifying the appropriate property owner when an alarm goes off; he said the ratio or percentage of payment compared with fees can be researched, and suggested if we decide to conduct further research, that one more year is the most we should wait; he said the $40,000 is what we pay for the contract. In response to a question about the number of false alarms,Mr. Jackson said we would have to research the data. Mr. Calhoun said the gross revenues are about $180,000 a year; and Ms. Taylor noted that in 2016 we have budgeted for $195,000 in gross revenues. Mr. Jackson said we would have to break that number down to show what the registration fee includes, what our contract cost pays for, how much Crywolf collects for false alarms, and other associated data. It was suggested to perhaps bring Council a report on Crywolf in August. Chief VanLeuven said while there is always room for improvement, the program has been very successful, and that since the ordinance was imposed, the accounts have increased and the secondary responses to false alarms have decreased; and that it would formerly would take thirty minutes to an hour for each deputy to respond;now 40%of the accounts where we didn't have account information on who to call,we now have the needed information and said the lack of owner information has been virtually eliminated due to the registration fee of$25.00 for the first year, which is reduced by 50% for the following year; he also noted there was a certain group of businesses in the past who had over one hundred false alarms, and they were 100% human error, so with training and education,he said that has been eliminated. Mr. Koudelka went through the intergovernmental services and said that since the economic decline in 2008,we have a priority of making sure we are as efficient as we can be; that in working with the County we have done some things jointly, other things the County did on their own, again, to make sure we get the best value possible; said re-working some of the contract cost methodologies resulted in good improvements and savings; and he went through several of those contract savings, noting that we will determine what the Prosecutor contract impact will be with the pre-trial diversion program. Chief VanLeuven also explained the positive aspects and time savings for the workload power shift, and reported that his deputies feel this is the best method ever to help with efficiencies. Chief VanLeuven also noted the loss of thirty-two deputies over the last eighteen months. Mr. Jackson added that we need to keep good matrixes on these new programs in order to track their progress; mentioned the great cooperation between police and county officers and him and Mr. Koudelka; said they have had multiple Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 7 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT meetings and the City has some control over how our police department operates, and it is through these processes that we shaped this program, which he said would not have existed without Mr. Koudelka and others working together; said it is not a program of the County but a product of the City of Spokane Valley and our work together. Mr. Koudelka then spoke concerning the jail contract and the 3.18% increase for 2014,which he said is still a decrease overall; said there was some deferred maintenance and the usage has dropped and as mentioned, he hopes to see the benefits from the pre-trial defense. He explained that emergency management shows an increase of 3.45% which includes the new animal control contract with costs fixed and capped at an increase relative to the CPI (consumer price index) change from year to year; that our actual costs in 2004 were $375,000, compared with our costs for 2016 of$295,000. Tab #10: Parks & Recreation: Director Stone noted that the overall increase for all items including payroll is down 3%; he explained the various divisions: Administrative with two FTEs, which is the biggest challenge as CenterPlace is becoming a place that never closes; there are no employees for maintenance as we contract with Senske Lawn & Tree Care; said we will be maintaining the first mile section of the Appleway Trail, and Senske does all the lawn maintenance on this trail as well as the Centennial Trail. Mr. Stone said that recreation has one FTE and is operated on 100% cost recovery; said they try to fill the gaps and not repeat services that other entities are providing; said he depends on temporary seasonal employees and hires one or two interns a year for functions like summer day camp or the outdoor movies. Mr. Stone reported that the summer day camp is very popular and filled the first week; said they also have a free summer park program at three parks which includes a free breakfast and lunch, provided by East Valley School District as an extension of the school year to supply meals to kids throughout the summer. Mr. Stone stated that the summer movies are very popular with attendance between 500 and 600 for each movie; he said that next year they will offer three movies, and said the more successful we are in getting sponsorships,the better. The Aquatics division also has no FTE's as Mr. Stone explained the outdoor pools are operated by the YMCA; he said we could not provide these services without the Y's competent management of all that it takes to run these pools,including managers, cash registers, attendance, and maintenance, and that they charge a small administrative fee plus their actual expenses, which Mr. Stone said he anticipates will decrease in 2016 since some repairs have been made and because each year the Y's organization and staff improve. Mr. Stone also reported that the pools were recently painted so we were able to reduce that for next year.Under small tools,Mr. Stone said they will be adding steps at each pool;the steps hook onto the pool edge and have been requested by numerous guests for assistance getting into and out of the pool with using the "lift." For the Senior Center, Mr. Stone said there is just one FTE, and he can't speak highly enough of her ability to deal with the daily challenges she encounters; said we have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Senior Center Association covering the aspects of the use of the CenterPlace, and said this has proven to be a very good partnership. CenterPlace, Mr. Stone explained, has five FTE's: a coordinator, two administrative assistants, and two maintenance workers who also work to maintain the police precinct; said the challenge is the Center is open seven days a week sometimes up to eighteen hours a day, making it tough to accommodate with staff, and therefore he depends heavily on hosts who work after hours and on weekends and are usually the public's first point of contact. Mr. Stone went over the small tools and minor equipment figures, mentioning the wear and tear and of the need to replace and repair such items as room chairs and tables. He mentioned there is a slight increase in janitorial services per the ISS Contract; and said that company also works to take down and set up as needed, especially when there is an event late in the evening followed by a different event early the next morning; and said although ISS will do that,he tries to keep that take down and set up to a minimum. Regarding the roof,Mr. Stone said that he has been in negotiations with the recommended roof contractor for about eight weeks; that he was having trouble getting them to sign the contract, that he has worked with our legal department and the contract has now been modified,but it is not yet signed, which he said is very frustrating as this company was highly recommended and is the only company that specializes in tile.Mr. Calhoun added that Council had previously discussed potential projects with Mr. Stone, and gave Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 8 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT as the first priority,the sound system in the Great Room, followed by the sound system in Room 109; he noted since we refinanced our bonds last year we saved the PFD (Public Facilities District) about one million dollars and the premise was that they would share some of that back with us to help with some of these projects. At approximately 2:00 p.m.Mayor Grafos called for a recess;he reconvened the meeting at 2:10 p.m. Tab #11: Community Development: Director Hohman explained that he tried to keep this much as it was last year except for training; however, the vehicle replacement fund came up and skewed his numbers; said overall total recurring for all four divisions is about 2.57%, and if you take out payroll and remove the vehicle replacement fund, we are left with a 1.025% increase. He noted the Administrative Division kept costs consistent across the board; said he will be sending a staff member to a weeklong economic development training session in Ellensburg; that he and Mr. Jackson have discussed the business plan and of the need to incorporate some performance measures connected with economic development; he said that hasn't been done yet but they realize that it is pertinent to do so and will be having regional meetings as a line item; said he will probably add another category about ongoing recruitments; and he mentioned as an aside,the work staff is doing connected with the heavy recruiting of a manufacturing company. Concerning economic development,Mr. Hohman said there are 2.6 FTEs;that he re-analyzed the .5 person and realized the person was working three days a week, hence the change from .5 to .6; he mentioned the newly hired Diane Prevost, Economic Development Specialist, who brings with her twenty year's marketing experience. Mr. Hohman said he also tried to increase some of the line items for publications, travel mileage, and subscriptions since staff has to be out in the community to attend such things as lunch meetings with their associated monetary costs, and wanted to make sure there is an adequate budget for that activity. Councilmember Pace suggested this might be a field where we could invest more. Mr. Hohman said there is a consultant on retainer to develop a recruitment strategy, and staff will be putting together a plan on how to move forward,where to target in order to acquire some of these commitments; said they have done a lot of research showing that we need a vibrant website and more testimonials, and he is working with John Guarisco on marketing commercials, including the possibility of YouTube or even television commercials, as we want to promote our city and its attributes, like free parking, great businesses and infrastructure. Councilmember Wick asked about certified sites and Mr. Hohman said staff was working to put together our own program; and has been discussing this topic with GSI to determine what the best program would be; he said there is no specific line item for this as staff works on the issue of hiring our own consultant or working in conjunction within the region. Mr. Jackson said we could add more detail for that and come up with a line item amount for perhaps adding a contractor. Mr. Hohman explained development services has eleven FTEs and is a compilation of development engineers, planning and code enforcement and funds are moved from different places in the budget depending on the circumstance, such as making sure code enforcement activities are adequately covered. Mr. Jackson noted that the next time we put these documents together, we will include the number of FTEs in each department/division, even though those figures are shown in the Business Plan. Mr. Calhoun talked briefly about the vehicle replacement fund, schedule and needs of the City's fleet. Concerning page two of the spreadsheet, Mr. Hohman noted the Spokane County GIS figure has been reduced since previous figures included costs for the Hearing Examiner, so $20,000 was added to intergovernmental services to cover those costs. Mr. Hohman said the building division has fourteen FTEs; and noted that the move of the permit center to this building works well and has increased his ability to coordinate and communicate,thereby making for more streamlined customer service. There was also brief discussion about the fees associated with accepting credit cards. Mayor Grafos suggested periodically going back to the bank or other entity issuing the credit card and remind them that costs continue to go up on all accounts, said banks will increase those costs if we don't monitor them, and suggested the banks might make adjustments if asked to do so. Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 9 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT Tab #12: Supplemental Requests: Ms. Taylor gave an overview of the several supplemental budget requests and explained that these items are not included in the earlier budget's general fund. One of the requests is a facility maintenance position for Public Works. Mr. Guth said that he would like to add this position toward the end of 2016 in order to have them closely involved with the close out of the City Hall construction project, and said he would likely advertise in the fall and that the position would be the same pay grade and work the same schedule as the Parks and Recreation facility maintenance position; that the idea now is to have one person and if another is needed,to borrow one of Mr. Stone's staff.Mr. Guth said the new City Hall building maintenance would be minimal, and this person could perform maintenance for the shop and police precinct as well. Mr. Calhoun said this position would reduce the budget by $217,000 and would be an additional position. Mr. Jackson said it is a major decision to add a staff member;that we can work out the amount,and said if this position were contracted out,we would pay the same amount plus overhead; that CenterPlace has proved that it is a lot of work for staff and somehow we have to provide maintenance for the new City Hall, and not a journeyman level type of position. There was some discussion about the timing of bringing the new person on board; the idea of having the new person learn all the systems and where they are located, with Mayor Grafos and Councilmember Hafner agreeing we need to have someone for that position. Concerning the tools and equipment, Mr. Guth said those are place holders to accommodate what this individual might need. Mr. Stone said the one regret he has about his maintenance person is that person was not there when the building was constructed and they find issues later that could have been taken care of earlier and saved money.Mr. Jackson said the position will be kept in the budget and he will determine the appropriate time to fill the position. Although the budget requests for Parks and Recreation requests the purchase of two acres of land near Sullivan Park, Mr. Stone explained that Washington State Department of Transportation is selling their property totaling thirteen acres and the City has been given the first right of refusal; that this additional property would allow us a concise north property line and remove any threat of new property owner's impact on the property; he said property acquisition is a priority within the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and the property has been appraised at $844,000, which gives a per acre cost of$65,000. Mr. Stone said we have about two months to consider this purchase option, and if someone else purchases this property, we would have to shrink our boundaries. Mr. Stone said Sullivan Park has started to become more emphasized in connection with the river use; and perhaps this would be an opportunity to turn that park into an outdoor destination; adding that in the long term, if the City decided later not to use the property, it could be easily surplused. Mr. Stone said he realizes the timing might not be good,but would like to seriously consider moving this forward, and the deadline to respond is August 7. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked about the status of a brownfield cleanup under the Union Pacific and Mr. Jackson said if Council is interested in this purchase, we would look into that first; but if there is no interest, then we would not pursue it further. Councilmember Pace said $1.7 million could be invested in several things; we could invest .8 million in land instead of investing in the banks; and seems it would be the smart thing to do. Councilmember Gothmann agreed it would be a good transfer of assets, and asked if we have the cash for the purchase. Mr. Jackson said we do. Mayor Grafos said he feels we should not make that purchase,that it is not a priority and we have other projects and we could be opening a can of worms with that property. Councilmember Hafner agreed that money could be used for Balfour Park if the library bond passes,which he said would be more beneficial to the City than buying this piece of property. There was additional discussion regarding the idea of this thirteen-acre purchase, including mention of other projects such as the library/park and that the library ballot outcome would be known August 4th. Mr. Jackson asked if there were any objections to staff looking further into this proposal and learning more about the cleanup. There were no objections. Concerning the public works storage shed,Mr. Guth said this was already calculated into the budget. Mr. Jackson asked if there were any objections to adding this item, and there were no objections. Mr. Guth said they have a lot of old equipment and would like to replace some of the ten-plus year old video equipment for vehicle detection at arterial intersections; said the useful life of the equipment is about eight to ten years, and they are starting to fail. Councilmember Pace said he wants to see the bigger picture and compare the loops to cameras, and Mr. Jackson said we can do that and examine different Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 10 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT ways to fund the project. Councilmember Wick asked about the possibility of an SRTC grant or bunching the equipment together from several intersections. Mr. Guth said he will ask Traffic Engineer Sean Messner about that idea. Mr. Stone explained that the next request is to continue the installation of the new park signs with three new signs, and replace the County signs with our City standard; also requested was to continue the installation of a splash pad at Browns Park; said this is the most requested improvement in our parks and the construction for 2016 is part of the Browns Park Masterplan; said the design costs are probably low, but the figure represents a good estimate and this would be a good way to demonstrate to the public that this park's focus is not just on volleyball. Another request,Mr. Stone explained, is to complete phase 2 of the Valley Mission Pocket Dog Park construction; also included is a request is to replace the existing modem and dial-up communication and point of sale systems at our three public swimming pools; and a final request is to develop the east half of Valley Mission Park; that reservations have stopped for use of the horse arena and he thinks other amenities would be more attractive and useful to our citizens, adding that this is still in the planning process. Councilmember Hafner said he likes the idea of the dog park. Mr. Calhoun said that Ms. Taylor will work with Mr. Stone to determine how much money would be left over in the general fund at the end of 2015, which will give us an idea of which of these requests to move forward, stating that we realize we cannot afford them all. Mr. Jackson noted that these requests are prioritized, and we could get them included even if not done, this year; said the Parks' projects would be paid for with money allocated specifically for parks; and if we buy the thirteen acres, that would come from the capital reserve; the rest of the requests are primarily vehicles. As the time was getting late, he asked Council if they want to continue today's discussion and talk about the snow plows, or end today's meeting now. Council agreed to keep going. Mr. Calhoun said vehicle replacements are replacements of existing vehicles and we have set funds aside so there is no additional expense to any fund. Concerning the request for a snow plow, Mr. Guth explained that he is requesting one replacement in 2016, a tandem truck,that we only have one in the fleet and ideally,we should have two; that the tandem leads the one group; that it would be a new one, bigger truck and bigger engine and would help on the hills and with performance, and when we get a good storm,we'll be ready. Mr. Guth said he found that the best performance is to have nine plows; a group of seven with two to help on hills; by running nine plows, he said we can plow arterials in twelve hours; with seven plows it would take sixteen hours; that we have nine plows but will have one newer one bought in 2011 or 2010;the next oldest plow is from 2000, and the rest were purchased in the 1990's from WSDOT. He added that WSDOT keeps their plows longer so it is no longer easy to buy used plows; that every three years he would like to buy a plow, thereby have a surplus or backup when needed. Deputy Mayor Woodard said that this idea leads to "personnel creep" and to beyond what was intended; said he is very reluctant to replace it and build a larger fleet. Mr. Guth explained that we are not building a larger fleet as now we have no backup plows; and with the age of our equipment, we typically have a breakdown. Mr. Jackson said he and Mr. Guth will discuss this further; and also noted as the old plows are replaced,we have nine plows and during the interim,there is a need for these as backup, so it is not a creep; these old plows do break down; they are well-maintained but they are old and Mr. Guth has come up with a long-term replacement plan, not just a growth plan but a backup plan where we get one and drop one; and he added that it is not uncommon to have one break down. Mr. Guth said it doesn't cost a lot to have one sit as a backup. Deputy Mayor Woodard suggested using a contractor as a backup; that spending $225,000 every three years would pay for services.Mr. Jackson explained that when the County decided to no longer provide us with snow plow services,we looked at a variety of options;the intent was for the City to own the plows and contract with street maintenance for the operation; he said that research showed us going in that it was extremely difficult to find contractor/employee truck drivers to work in the winter as they are laid off and their compensation is better being laid off then working for us; said we ran into this issue with trying to find qualified drivers so the idea of owning the trucks was the idea from the beginning; and Council agreed we would own them;we have gone from five to seven to nine and we need to make sure we have the right number of vehicles, and Mr. Guth said nine is the correct amount; whether we need backup is a big part of the question; if we go back to 2008 and 2009 when we were buried in the Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 11 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT snow, we couldn't call up a plow in this region, and ambulances couldn't get down the street; so we decided we needed to be responsible for that decision. Mr. Jackson added that we have graders on contract. Deputy Mayor Woodard replied that you buy the equipment and start the process to maintain the equipment, and we then become a maintenance driving equipment owning operation with a continual cost and said he thinks that is going in the wrong direction and would move us to become a big public works department. Councilmember Gothmann said that contractors own graders and do not own the kinds of trucks used to plow streets; said that these large trucks can plow in greater time than graders; but we can't find people with these big trucks, so the City determined to buy the equipment; he said we have to have graders and large trucks and can't do an effective job of plowing the city without both. Mayor Grafos said that he doesn't want to expand the fleet and again asked, what is the ideal number of trucks; if that number is nine, then we should have nine working trucks; and the question remains whether we need backups. Mr. Guth said liability is the key; that generally with nine new trucks, we won't need any backups; but we don't have nine new trucks, our equipment is much older and breaks down; that once we get the newer truck, we sell off the older one. Mr. Guth said that nine trucks will get the job done in twelve hours, which is the length of a normal shift and it works well labor-wise. Mr. Jackson said staff will come up with a plan such as the next time we buy one, we drop one, or some semblance of that idea; as when it snows heavy you will wish you had those to provide the necessary level of service for our citizens. Mr. Jackson said we can come back with a plan over the next couple months to help us settle on the right number of vehicles. Tab 13: Potential Capital Projects Mr. Calhoun said we bring this back to Council about twice a year; that this continues to evolve over time; and he went over the projects listed on the spreadsheet; said we have a finite amount of funds and an infinite amount of projects; he explained the numbers in the small box on the bottom left of the page, and said Council can consider these and we can come back later for further discussion. Mayor Grafos agreed there are limited funds; said we should prioritize where we spend; that for just Parks,these represent over$1 million; said there are a lot of challenges coming up and we need to set some funds aside for the Pines Road Underpass and not wait for the federal and/or state government to give us some funds; and that perhaps we could dedicate 25% of the $1.7 million each year for that underpass; because if we never start it, it will never be finished; also if the library passes,we will have Balfour Park; or perhaps we could work to have quiet zones; and said he would like to fmish some of these projects before starting with a new thirteen acre property. Councilmember Pace said not for now, but for some time in the future, he would like to understand more of what is involved with the sewer industrial area east of Flora. Mr. Jackson said that is possible; that the intent was to start with the discussion with Tschirley Road and include that area. Councilmember Hafner said there are safety factors to consider and these projects need to be prioritized; he mentioned the railroad at Trent and that serious consideration should be taken to alleviate that problem; and he suggested fmishing some of those types of jobs before adding others. Councilmember Wick said he thinks these issues will change soon as the Appleway Trail project get completed, perhaps there would be an opportunity to examine parkland acquisition; or the Barker Road Grade separation, and that if we continue, we could bring those issues forward faster; and said he would like to consider the parkland acquisition as we could always sell some or all if we wanted to later. Mayor Grafos questioned if we were in the real estate business, and Councilmember Wick replied we are not, but said it is easier to purchase property when the property is actually for sale, versus trying to find land. Councilmember Hafner said he sees no reason why Council shouldn't look at it; adding that Balfour Park has to be finished. Mr. Jackson said we can examine these together as we don't want to shortcut the process; and that there is no harm in examining these issues and coming to a conclusion. It was agreed that the discussion on Council goals will be held at a later date. Brainstorming: Mr. Jackson opened the floor for ideas, and mentioned that we acted on 90% of items Council brought up in previous sessions. Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 12 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Pace: long term goal: put together a plan for marketing/development to set a goal for five years out, of getting multiple bidders on every single contract so that in five to ten years, the results will show multiple bidders on every contract. Councilmember Wick: Development around and/or promotion of the River,especially the north side. Councilmember Gothmann: need a bike path at 16th and Dishman Mica to Appleway as you can't get through there as there is no path or lane. Councilmember Pace: concerning an economic development plan, we need to prioritize the big projects like the sewer in the industrial park, bridging the valley, and would like to see those meshed together in an economic development plan that helps us prioritize those by making those projects the strategies within the economic development plan. Councilmember Hafner: regarding the new library and new city hall,to have a culture center of some sort or an arts center which represents us. Mr. Jackson said we increased the lodging tax funds to get a study done,that although a motion was related to a sports facility,we could talk about trying to spend that as we don't know what type of tourist venue will attract people to our community. Councilmember Hafner said we don't have anything like the City of Spokane, and Councilmember Wick added that he would like to have conversations about those tourism destinations. Councilmember Pace: said he would like to see a 1%property reduction in 2018. Mayor Grafos: concerning our small works roster, asked if there is any way we don't have to pay prevailing wage, and Mr. Guth replied that is state-mandated. However, Mr. Jackson said there is some discussion about that in the legislature and we could research that topic. Councilmember Wick: his goal is to prioritize the grade separation; and try to bring that up with our legislators. Councilmember Higgins added the idea of bridging Pines; said we would have to have both railroad companies consolidate their lines through the valley, but would like to get the railroads to the table to begin talking, as we have bonding capacity and cash. Councilmember Wick: mentioned the challenges to maintain our street maintenance preservation funds and would like discussions on how to fund preservation projects. Mayor Grafos: suggested prioritizing bus shelter pads. Mr. Jackson said Mr. Guth is working on that and will come back to Council with a plan; that the biggest constraint many times is in the acquisition of right-of-way. There were no further ideas, and it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Workshop minutes: June 16,2015 Page 13 of 13 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,June 23,2015 Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem Morgan Koudelka, Sr.Administrative Analyst Eric Guth,Public Works Director Absent: Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Rod Higgins,Councilmember Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Ben Wick, Councilmember INVOCATION: Pastor Bill Dropko, Greenacres Christian Fellowship Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council,staff and audience rose for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmembers Higgins and Wick. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse both Councilmembers Wick and Higgins from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: East Valley Community Coalition: Youth members of the East Valley Community Coalition presented a "Photo Voice" project demonstrating the youth's gained awareness of the impact that advertising and product placement of alcohol and tobacco products have on youths' perceptions of substance use by minors; and the results of their"Community Assessment of Neighborhood Stores" (CANS) Survey. COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Hafner: reported that he visited ITT Technical School, met their facility, and gave the commencement speech for their twenty-seven graduates; attended the Council meeting where Council interviewed eighteen applicants to temporarily fill Councilmember Bates' position, and attended the special meeting where Mr. Bill Gothmann was chosen to fill that position; attended a SCOPE executive session to determine agenda items for their program; mentioned the Chamber of Commerce "Big Five" meeting where the Chamber will be setting some objectives to make sure we are visible as a community; participated in the Council all-day budget meeting; went to a Visit Spokane Board all-day meeting; attended the Board of Health executive meeting to set the agendas for the next few weeks; also attended several STA (Spokane Transit Authority) meetings, one where the failure of the STA ballot issue was discussed; went to the regular SCOPE Board meeting; the Chamber Business meeting; and today met with East Valley Kiwanis. Councilmember Pace: also mentioned the Chamber's "Big Five" meeting; went to the ribbon cutting for the new volleyball courts at Browns Park; and attended the STA Board meeting and the Chamber breakfast. Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-23-2015 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Gothmann: attended a Valleyfest meeting where they talked about the festival; did some extensive work on the cycle celebration; attended the ribbon cutting at Browns Park, and our City's all- day budget meeting. Deputy Mayor Woodard: said he attended the City's budget workshop and mentioned the tremendous amount of work staff does for the initial draft;went to several Chamber of Commerce meetings, including the Biz Bits last Friday where John Dixon from Spokane County gave a presentation on changing a culture in government; mentioned the Chamber's Big Five meeting; and said he attended the Browns Park ribbon cutting. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Grafos reported that he attended the City's finance committee meeting; hosted the Northeast Mayor's Conference here where they discussed issues of common interest; he presented the State of the City address to the GSI Board; participated in our City's budget workshop; went to Browns Park tour and ribbon cutting; and toured Trentwood's Kaiser Aluminum Plant, which he said was built in 1942, completed in 1943, and is still operating as a rolling mill although equipment and technology is a challenge. PROCLAMATION: Parks and Recreation Month Mayor Grafos read the "Parks and Recreation Month" proclamation, which was accepted with thanks from Parks and Recreation Director Mike Stone who said that this July marks the 30th year of Parks and Recreation Month; he explained that parks were created to serve the people and give them an opportunity to have fun and appreciate nature. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Grafos invited public comments. Peggy Doering on behalf of Valleyfest, she introduced the Royal Court from the Miss Spokane Valley Pageant, Queen Mariah Reneau,Krystian Young, and not present Sarah Fotheringham, all three of whom attend Central Valley High School; said they will represent Valleyfest and Spokane Valley at local events and parades, and will also be at the grand opening of the Appleway Trail. Cindy Hallet: shared pictures of several businesses who she said are in violation of conducting a business in a residential area; said our City Code requires everyone engaged in a business to register annually with the city and said there are several businesses operating in their residences without licenses and without a home occupancy permit; and she wants council to get back to her on this issue. Linda Thompson Executive Director of Greater Substance Abuse Council; thanked Council and employees for all they have done in the prevention of substance abuse; mentioned that the youth who presented today are a good sample of the upcoming kind of leadership we have in our area; said her organization decided it would recognize community partners who do random acts of prevention, and she handed the City a certificate for such recognition, and again thanked Council for allowing the students to make the presentation, and for being a positive role model city. Steve Puccihio, Spokane City: said he lives on the north side of Spokane; and works for the coalition for motorcycle clubs in Spokane County, and his concern is the ability to raise funds for charity. Perry Stevens, Deer Park: also a member of Combat Riders in Spokane Valley, and said they will be the political liaison for the club and any questions about their fundraising or organization can be directed to him, and said that Deputy Mayor Woodard has his phone number. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of vouchers on June 23,2015 Request for Council Action Form Totaling: $3,149.589.09 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 15,2015: $327,509.56 c.Approval of June 2,2016 Study Session Council Meeting Minutes d.Approval of June 9,2016 Formal Format Council Meeting Minutes Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-23-2015 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT e.Approval of June 10,2015 Special Council Meeting Minutes f.Approval of June 15,2015 Special Council Meeting Minutes It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS 2. Proposed Resolution 15-005 Adopting 2016-2021 Six Year TIP—Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Resolution No. 15-005, adopting the 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as presented. After Mr. Worley briefly went over the history of the TIP, Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. It was then moved by Councilmember Pace and seconded to amend the motion to remove item #4 McDonald Road DIET 16th to Mission, to take it off and consider it separately. Councilmember Pace said it is hard to imagine what it would be like if this road were on a diet where cars were restricted to two lanes because at four lanes, it is busy. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked Mr. Worley if he had a car count north of Sprague and Mr. Worley responded that he did not,but could get that data; said the capacity of a three-lane road is surprisingly large because of the center turn lane; said Broadway has more traffic than McDonald and the traffic moves well. Mr. Worley said that this particular project has been to Council several times, prior to staff applying for the grant; said Council agreed to that submittal and we got the grant and this is funded. Vote on the motion to amend: In Favor: Councilmember Pace. Opposed:Mayor Grafos, Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Gothmann, and Hafner. Motion to amend failed. Vote on the original motion to approve Resolution No. 15-005, adopting the TIP as presented: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 3.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Montgomery Ave St Preservation— Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the Montgomery Street Preservation project, #0218 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of$344,326 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. After Mr. Worley gave a brief history of the proposal, Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 4.Motion Consideration: Bid Award for Mansfield Avenue Connection Project#0156— Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the Mansfield Avenue Connection Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Inland Asphalt Company, in the amount of$516,455.00 and to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. After Mr. Worley gave a brief history of the proposal, Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None.Motion carried. 5.Motion Consideration: JAG Grant Application -Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to authorize the City Manager to apply for the Justice Assistance Grant. Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that we have been allocated $19,737 as part of the 2015 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program; that the funds are designed to support components of the criminal justice system and the Police Chief and City Manager recommend spending the funds on enhancing the camera and security system at the Precinct Building. Mr.Koudelka mentioned that no match is required with this grant.Mayor Grafos invited public comment. Jim Flue gal asked how we came up with the dollars for the grant money, and what happens if we get more than we need, and asked about checks and balances. Mr. Koudelka explained that with Parks and Recreation Director Stone's oversight,we already got bids and the lowest bid came in around that amount; that it might be over by a few hundred dollars but we have appropriations to cover any overage; that the allocated funds for the JAG are pre-set by the Federal Justice Department, and we always receive the full allocation they provide. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-23-2015 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Grafos invited public comments;no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 6. Bus Shelter Plan—Eric Guth Via his PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Guth gave an overview of the bus shelters, said they not only protect commuters from the weather, but provide for an easy and comfortable experience while waiting for the bus; he explained that Spokane Valley secures grants, acquires easements, designs and manages construction of the pads,while STA installs and maintains the actual shelters.Mr. Guth showed examples of recent installations, followed by possible future locations. In response to a question from Mayor Grafos about the number of shelters,Mr. Guth said prior to the six recently installed,there were only two shelters in our city. Mayor Grafos suggested that since we are at the mercy of the STA and their funding, perhaps we should allocate $50,000 to $60,000 to start a program to buy pads and have them ready to go once STA gets the shelters, rather than just wait for STA to call. Mr. Guth agreed that would be a good strategy if we could find the funds for the purchase. Mr. Calhoun stated that we are in the process of building our 2016 budget and he will share this suggestion with Mr. Jackson to see if we can come up with the funding in the next calendar year. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if we made a request for more since STA apparently gets them every year; and Mr. Guth said he would need to research that further. Council agreed they would like additional information. 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos Councilmember Pace asked about the extra budget with $1.7 million from sales tax revenues, and suggested a future discussion about that, showing several options. Mr. Calhoun said that was also addressed during last week's budget workshop; that up to this point we had set aside $10 million into our capital reserve with the entire amount committed, but said that data is evolutionary in nature; and that he will talk with Mr. Jackson about bringing that back as an administrative report to further discussion how those funds might be committed. 8. Department Reports These reports were for information only and were not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Mr. Calhoun said we are waiting to hear regarding the passage of the state budget; said he received word that if the state does close, that the our normal sales and other tax distribution will be paid at the end of the month; and if the budget is extended through the end of July, that Olympia will keep a very limited staff working, and that the business license registration will not be operational July 1St if the budget is not passed; and he expressed concern about grant reimbursements on a variety of projects. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-23-2015 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington June 30,2015 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace,Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Pro Tem John Hohman,Community Dev.Director Chelsie Taylor,Interim Finance Director Gloria Mantz,Development Engineer Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll;all Councilmembers were present. Amended Agenda: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to amend the agenda. A. Added Item: Emergency Ordinance 15-013 Adopting a Moratorium on Mining and Mineral Product Manufacturing—Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded, to suspend the rules and approve Ordinance No. 15-013, repealing Ordinance No. 15-005 and Ordinance No. 15-009 and adopting a moratorium on mining and/or mining site operations, including excavation, mineral product manufacturing, mineral processing, stockpiling, and mineral batching. Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that this proposed emergency ordinance simultaneously repeals other ordinances which established the moratorium and adopted findings of fact, and re-establishes the moratorium to allow a new public hearing and provide the public notice and opportunity for public comment. Mr. Lamb explained that a public hearing was conducted March 24, 2015, and we received public testimony: two written comments were received and six interested parties spoke; said since that time we determined we did not provide all the public notice we could have as we did not formally publish the notice in the City's newspaper as we normally do; so another public hearing will be held to provide that formal notice and ensure that all interested parties who desire to speak will have that notice and be able to comment at that time. Mr. Lamb explained that there is no change to the operative moratorium language from the original ordinance, and the duration has not changed; that it was originally set for one year so this will also run through the same period and end February 23, 2016; so we are not adding additional time or trying to extend the moratorium further; that this is simply about the public notice, and said the new public hearing is set for July 28, 2015, here in Council Chambers. Mr. Lamb noted that as with the original ordinance, this also includes a workplan as required by state law; and since this is an emergency ordinance, it would be effective immediately upon adoption. Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. Council Study Session:06-30-2015 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT ACTION ITEMS: 1. Comprehensive Plan Overlays and Text Amendments—John Hohman It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to include text and overlay requests in the Comp Plan Analysis: CAR 2015-0018; and CAR 2015-0021 through 0024; and to exclude 2015-0025 and 0026 from the Comp Plan Analysis. Senior Planner Barlow went over the background of the CARS (Citizen Action Requests); said the twenty-six applications were divided into two batches: one for site specific amendment requests, and the other for map overlays/text amendments; that Council previously agreed to include all the site specific amendment requests for further analysis; and at the June 9, 2015 Council meeting, informally agreed not to move two, and to move five overlays/text amendments further for analysis. Ms. Barlow briefly explained each request, and said the two requests with a recommendation from Council not to include for further analysis were regarding manufactured home parks; that after tonight staff will send these requests on for further analysis and we will continue the update process; she also noted that Mr. Tadas Kisielius will be at the July 21 Council meeting to discuss this process further. Mayor Grafos invited public comment. (1)Mr. Alan Delaubenfels, 13120 E 6th Avenue: said he supports the comp plan re-evaluation process but there is some confusion about what's been taking place, and he wants to make sure it is known that he's opposed to the idea of immediate rezoning but supports the re-evaluation process so the whole city is evaluated and studied concerning impacts of any property that might be changed. (2) Mr. Terry Warner, N 3211 Tschirley Road: spoke concerning the Mica View Trailer Park; said he and about eighteen others are not in favor of high density zoning on Valleyway Court south of Laberry; that it adds congestion, crime, and noise pollution; that he finds some of the new developments in the valley to be "poorly put- together" and "cheaply constructed;" said several people living in the trailer courts are on some kind of state help and/or are disabled; and said he sees suburban sprawl around the valley. Councilmember Pace said he realizes there are others there tonight who would like to comment about the other, site-specific amendment requests, and Mayor Grafos agreed since we are discussing the Comprehensive Plan, that all comments would be welcome. (3) Ms. Donna Blumberg, lives on Upriver Drive, not in Spokane Valley: said there are problems with traffic in that area; and adding more density would cause a "real mess." (AI Mr. Jim Fluegel: referenced a handout he had concerning advertising and units for rent; said with phase two "they" could have 96 units. (5) Mr. James Johnson, 13224 E 4th: spoke concerning density bonuses and some concern about no one taking advantage of those incentives; asked Council to keep in mind that MF1 or MF2 with density bonus means 2.5 times, which is what would happen to the homes that are adjacent and which would be a substantial difference; he suggested Council allow those impacted to create a barrier for themselves. There were no further public comments. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Historic Preservation—Gloria Mantz Development Engineer Mantz explained that during an April meeting, Council had requested additional information on historic preservation; said she was assured that we have the authority to write the ordinance and have the program the way we want it, and being listed on the historic register is a voluntary program; and that many jurisdictions use this type of program to encourage visitors. As noted in the ordinance template, Ms. Mantz explained that we could specify in our ordinance that anyone could nominate anyone else, or just the property owner,but that the property owner must approve their property being part of the register.Ms.Mantz said there are about 350 active properties in Spokane City with about half receiving incentives for a total of over $200,000 in incentives; that if a property invests $100,000 in their property and assumes their property tax would be lowered, that is good incentive to be included on the register. Councilmember Hafner said he feels Council should make the decision about a building Council Study Session:06-30-2015 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT being on the register and not the historic commission, and Ms. Mantz replied that decisions made by the commission could be appealed by Council, or we could include additional language to make Council the final decision-maker; and she said that Council would appoint members of the Historic Commission. Councilmember Pace again asked about rolling back building codes to make the regulations more like when the building was built, and City Attorney Driskell said we could do some minor amendments, but we still must meet the intent to provide safety requirements, and that we would have limited ability to adopt building codes in that regard. After Ms. Mantz explained the benefits, drawbacks, and estimated cost of such a program, Council concurred to move this forward. 3. Tourism Promotion Area(TPA)—Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney Lamb said that this topic was originally brought up during the winter workshop; and he gave some background on the legislation concerning a TPA as well as the maximum charges allowed per night; went over some of the highlights of the Spokane County TPA and the Interlocal Agreement, which our City also signed; and explained a little about TPA revenues and how the funds are or can be used. Mr. Lamb noted that Liberty Lake formed its own TPA in 2004, and in 2011, they entered into an agreement with Visit Spokane to manage the Liberty Lake tourism promotion area, much like is done through the Spokane County TPA and TPA Interlocal, adding that as part of the management, Visit Spokane prepares the budget for Liberty Lake approval and then receives and expends the revenues from the Liberty Lake TPA. Deputy Mayor Woodard said that a problem with the Interlocal is there is no exiting ability, and Mr. Lamb replied that the Interlocal was agreed to by all parties and we could seek an amendment if Council wished to pursue that. Deputy Mayor Woodard said that there is no way for us to form our own TPA even if we wanted to, and said he doesn't want to. Mayor Grafos added that even though Liberty Lake has Visit Spokane prepare the budget, Liberty Lake still has a measure of control that we don't, and said he would like to explore that issue,examine Liberty Lake's agreement, and discuss this again at an upcoming Council meeting. Mr. Lamb explained that Liberty Lake never entered into this Interlocal,meaning that they started with a "clean slate" but an option would be to discuss this issue with other parties about possible amendments; and Councilmembers nodded in agreement. Councilmember Gothmann said that he is a member of the Valleyfest Board and in charge of the cycle celebration; that our city provides about 116th of the funds and he would challenge anyone to find more than 1116th of the amount of publications that refer to Spokane Valley; and said he favors examining the options. Mayor Grafos agreed and mentioned Visit Spokane's magazine. Mr. Jackson said staff will investigate further and provide an examination of what Visit Spokane or the TPA has provided to our City. Councilmember Hafner said that the other agencies can out-vote us; that Visit Spokane brands an area and can only brand Spokane because no one else understands just Spokane Valley; said he had in-depth conversations with them about how to improve our recognition, and said that Mr. Basinger is doing a great job and that he too would like to examine what we can do under this arrangement. Councilmember Wick added that the TPA is just one source of funds,with the LTAC (Lodging Tax Advisory Committee)being the other; and a third piece is when we did the convention center bonds, part of that was a promise of 2% lodging tax that goes to the PFD (Public Facilities District); said he does not know what the Interlocal looks like but perhaps we should look at what obligations we have on that 2%that goes to the construction. Mr. Lamb agreed and said we can look at that other 2%as well as other taxes specific to the PFD. 4. Indigent Defense Standards— Cary Driskell Via his PowerPoint presentation,Mr.Driskell explained that we were recently advised by the Washington State Office of Public Defense that in order for us to be in compliance with state law, we need to adopt our own standards, even though we had to this point, contracted with Spokane County and relied on their indigent defense standards. Council agreed to proceed with a resolution to adopt the standards at an upcoming Council meeting. Council Study Session:06-30-2015 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 5. Telecommunications Franchise,Fatbeam— Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell explained the proposed franchise agreement with Fatbeam, and that they purchased the fiber optic facilities formerly owned by EMAN, which had obtained a ten-year franchise with us, and which franchise expired in 2013.Mr. Driskell said this agreement would also be for a ten-year period, and that this ordinance is similar to other franchises we have with private utility companies. Council agreed to proceed with an ordinance reading at an upcoming Council meeting. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 7. Transportation Improvement(TIB) Call for Projects This was an "information only" item and was not reported or discussed. 8. Council Comments—Mayor Grafos Deputy Mayor Woodard noted he will be out of town July 7 instead of July 14, and said he would like to participate in the July 7 Council meeting next week via telephone conference call. It was then moved by Councilmember Wick, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the telephone meeting participation of Deputy Mayor Woodard for next week's Council meeting. 9. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson Concerning legislative action, City Manager Jackson said that the State approved their budget but things are still moving and changing; that he spoke with Lobbyist Briahna Taylor who informed him that state leadership decided not to go with House Bill 2156, which was an omnibus bill which included our nuisance language; that an operating budget was passed by the house and senate and sent to the governor for approval and that it would restore the historical levels of liquor revenues to cities, which he said represents about $200,000 a year; said the transportation revenue package was passed but it did not include our Barker Overpass project, and that transportation revenue package included an increase in gas tax by 11.9¢ phased in through 2019, with an anticipated 16.20 over the next sixteen years; said there is still no action on the capital budget,but a negotiated budget has been agreed to which includes $1 million for Appleway Trail, Evergreen to Sullivan; said there is also language in legislation about vaping lounges as a result of our City's efforts, and that the near future will see more discussion about what that means and what local ordinances or action might be taken based on that, but that it substantially restricts sale or use of marijuana in vaping clubs. Councilmember Hafner noted that the legislature approved $15 million for an STA ten-year plan to include a downtown central city line, even though that was turned down by the voters. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session:06-30-2015 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First reading - Proposed Ordinance 15-014 granting telecommunications franchise to Fatbeam. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.47.040. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report June 30, 2015. BACKGROUND: This proposed franchise agreement with Fatbeam would grant a non- exclusive franchise to construct, maintain, and operate telecommunication facilities within the public rights-of-way of the City. Fatbeam does not currently have a telecommunications franchise in the City. The company is located in Coeur d'Alene. It recently purchased the fiber optic facilities previously owned by EMAN, which obtained a ten-year franchise from the City in 2003, which lapsed in 2013. Fatbeam is anticipated to use these facilities to primarily provide telecommunications fiber to educational facilities. This agreement would grant a franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the public rights-of-way and public places located in the City, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise. Similar to other franchises with private utility companies, the City would collect no fee from this agreement. The cost of any new construction or maintenance of Fatbeam's facilities shall be solely Fatbeam's expense. The City would require Fatbeam to maintain insurance through the entire period of this agreement. The City will publish, at Fatbeam's cost, a summary of the franchise in the newspaper following adoption prior to it becoming effective. Staff recommends approval of the proposed franchise. OPTIONS: (1) move to a second reading; (2) take other action as appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we advance proposed Ordinance 15-014 granting a telecommunications franchise to Fatbeam, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Ordinance 15-014 granting telecommunications franchise to Fatbeam. (2) Route map of the fiber facilities. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 15-014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO FATBEAM TO CONSTRUCT,MAINTAIN AND OPERATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City to grant, permit, and regulate "nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or places above or below the surface of the ground for railroads and other routes and facilities for public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid fuels, for water, sewer and other private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service;" and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 further requires that "no ordinance or resolution granting any franchise in a code city for any purpose shall be adopted or passed by the city's legislative body on the day of its introduction nor for five days thereafter, nor at any other than a regular meeting nor without first being submitted to the city attorney, nor without having been granted by the approving vote of at least a majority of the entire legislative body,nor without being published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city before becoming effective;"and WHEREAS,this Ordinance has been submitted to the City Attorney prior to its passage; and WHEREAS,the Council finds that the grant of the Franchise contained in this Ordinance, subject to its terms and conditions, is in the best interests of the public, and protects the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of this City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington,ordains as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words and terms shall have the meaning set forth below: "City Manager"means the City Manager or designee. "construction" or "construct" shall mean constructing, digging, excavating, laying, testing, operating, extending, upgrading, renewing, removing, replacing, and repairing a facility. "day" shall mean a 24-hour period beginning at 12:01 AM. If a thing or act is to be done in less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation of time. "franchise area" shall mean the entire geographic area within the City as it is now constituted or may in the future be constituted. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 1 of 14 DRAFT "hazardous substances" shall have the same meaning as RCW 70.105D.020(10). "maintenance,maintaining or maintain" shall mean the work involved in the replacement and/or repair of facilities, including constructing, relaying, repairing, replacing, examining, testing, inspecting, removing, digging and excavating, and restoring operations incidental thereto. "overbuilding" shall mean adding additional fiber capacity to an existing conduit housing fiber optic cable. "overlashing" shall mean the act of lashing new fiber optic cable to an existing aerial fiber optic cable. "permittee" shall mean a person or entity who has been granted a permit by the permitting authority. "permitting authority" shall mean the City Manager or designee authorized to process and grant permits required to perform work in the rights-of-way. "product" shall refer to the item,thing or use provided by the Grantee. "public property" shall mean any real estate or any facility owned by the City. "Public Works Director" shall mean the Spokane Valley Public Works Director or his/her designee. "relocation" shall mean any required move or relocation of an existing installation or equipment owned by Grantee whereby such move or relocation is necessitated by installation, improvement, renovation or repair of another entity's facilities in the rights- of-way,including Grantor's facilities. "right-of-way" shall refer to the surface of and the space along, above, and below any street, road, highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley, court, boulevard, parkway, drive, Grantee easement, and/or public way now or hereafter held or administered by the City. "streets" or "highways" shall mean the surface of, and the space above and below, any public street, road, alley or highway, within the City used or intended to be used by the general public,to the extent the City has the right to allow the Grantee to use them. "telecommunications facilities" shall mean any of the plant, equipment, fixtures, appurtenances, antennas, and other facilities necessary to furnish and deliver telecommunications services, including but not limited to poles with crossarms, poles without crossarms, wires, lines, conduits, cables, communication and signal lines and equipment, braces, guys, anchors, vaults, and all attachments, appurtenances, and appliances necessary or incidental to the distribution and use of telecommunications services. The abandonment by Grantee of any telecommunications facilities as defined herein shall not act to remove the same from this definition. Section 2. Grant of Franchise. The City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter as"City" or"the City"),hereby grants unto Fatbeam(hereinafter"Grantee"), a franchise for a period of 10 years, beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance, to install, construct, operate, Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 2 of 14 DRAFT maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities to place telecommunications facilities in, under, on, across, over,through, along or below the public rights-of-way and public places located in the City of Spokane Valley, as approved under City permits issued pursuant to this franchise (hereinafter the "franchise"). This franchise does not permit Grantee to use such facilities to provide cable services as defined by 47 C.F.R. § 76.5(ff). Section 3. Fee. No right-of-way use fee is imposed for the term of this franchise. Any such right-of-way use or franchise fee that may be imposed by subsequent ordinance would apply to any subsequent franchise,if any,between the parties. Section 4. City Use. The following provisions shall apply regarding City use. A)Grantee agrees to reserve to the City the right to access four dark fiber strands (two pair) along the route identified in Exhibit A as adopted or amended, within the boundaries of the City, for sole and exclusive municipal, non-commercial use or designation (the "City Reserved Fibers"). Grantee can currently only reserve one pair of dark fiber for City use due to capacity limitations in its legacy system. Grantee anticipates installing additional capacity through overlashing in the future, and shall affirmatively notify the City when a second pair of dark fiber is available for potential use as City Reserved Fiber in any portion of the franchise area where any such overlashing has occurred. City agrees that it shall not use the City Reserved Fibers as a public utility provider of telecommunications business service to the public. B) The City has the right to access by connection to the City Reserved Fibers at existing Grantee splice points or reasonably established access points within the City limits; provided that all splicing shall be the sole responsibility of Grantee. The City shall provide at least 30 days' written notice of intent to access the City Reserved Fibers. Upon any access or use of the City Reserved Fibers, City shall pay Grantee a recurring monthly charge of$20.00 per fiber pair per mile in use by the City (the "City Fiber Rate") unless otherwise specifically agreed by both the parties in writing and shall negotiate and enter into a "Fiber License Agreement" which shall govern the terms and conditions for use of the City Reserved Fibers, except cost, which is set forth herein. Said recurring monthly charge shall not be imposed until such time as the fiber is put into use by the City. C) In the event the City Reserved Fibers are the last fibers remaining in Grantee's fiber bundle, then the following shall apply: 1) If the City is using the fibers,then the rate the City shall pay Grantee will change from the City Fiber Rate to Grantee's standard commercial rate. 2) If the City is not using the fibers,the City shall have the option of abandoning the City Reserved Fibers in lieu of paying Grantee's standard commercial rate. If Grantee installs additional fiber capacity, the City's right to use four dark fiber stands as set forth in subsections 1 and 2,immediately above, shall again be in effect. D) All access, interconnection and maintenance to and on the City Reserved Fibers shall be performed by Grantee. The City shall pay all costs associated with such work to the City Reserved Fibers. The City Reserved Fibers shall have a term that matches the duration of this franchise Ordinance. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 3 of 14 DRAFT E) Consistent with and subject to RCW 35.99.070, at such time when Grantee is constructing, relocating, or placing ducts or conduits in public rights-of-way, the Public Works Director may require Grantee to provide the City with additional duct or conduit and related structures, at incremental cost, necessary to access the conduit at mutually convenient locations. Any ducts or conduits provided by Grantee under this section shall only be used for City municipal, non- commercial purposes. 1) The City shall not require that the additional duct or conduit space be connected to the access structures and vaults of the Grantee. 2) This section shall not affect the provision of an institutional network by a cable television provider under federal law. 3) Grantee shall notify the Public Works Director at least 14 days' prior to opening a trench at any location to allow the City to exercise its options as provided herein. Section 5. Recovery of Costs. Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of one publication of this franchise in a local newspaper, and required legal notices prior to any public hearing regarding this franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of this franchise. Grantee shall be subject to all permit and inspection fees associated with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this franchise or under City Code. Section 6. Non-Exclusivity. This franchise is granted upon the express condition that it shall not in any manner prevent the City from granting other or further franchises or permits in any rights-of-way. This and other franchises shall, in no way, prevent or prohibit the City from using any of its rights-of-way or affect its jurisdiction over them or any part of them. Section 7. Non-Interference with Existing Facilities. The City shall have prior and superior right to the use of its rights-of-way and public properties for installation and maintenance of its facilities and other governmental purposes. The City hereby retains full power to make all changes, relocations, repairs, maintenance, establishments, improvements, dedications or vacation of same as the City may deem fit, including the dedication, establishment, maintenance, and improvement of all new rights-of-way, streets, avenues, thoroughfares and other public properties of every type and description. Any and all such removal or replacement shall be at the sole expense of Grantee, unless RCW 35.99.060 provides otherwise. Should Grantee fail to remove, adjust or relocate its telecommunications facilities by the date established by the Public Works Director's written notice to Grantee and in accordance with RCW 35.99.060, the City may cause and/or effect such removal, adjustment or relocation, and the expense thereof shall be paid by Grantee. The owners of all utilities, public or private, installed in or on such public properties prior to the installation of the telecommunications facilities of Grantee, shall have preference as to the positioning and location of such utilities so installed with respect to Grantee. Such preference shall continue in the event of the necessity of relocating or changing the grade of any such public properties. Grantee's telecommunications facilities shall be constructed and maintained in such manner as not to interfere with any public use, or with any other pipes, wires, conduits or other facilities that may have been laid in the rights-of-way by or under the City's authority. If the work done under this franchise damages or interferes in any way with the public use or other facilities, Grantee shall wholly and at its own expense make such provisions necessary to eliminate the interference or damage to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 4 of 14 DRAFT Section 8. Construction Standards. All work authorized and required hereunder shall comply with all generally applicable City Codes and regulations. Grantee shall also comply with all applicable federal and state regulations, laws and practices. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality of the work done, whether it is by itself or by contractors, assigns or agencies. Application of said federal, state, and City Codes and regulations shall be for the purposes of fulfilling the City's public trustee role in administering the primary use and purpose of public properties, and not for relieving the Grantee of any duty, obligation, or responsibility for the competent design, construction, maintenance, and operation of its telecommunications facilities. Grantee is responsible for the supervision, condition, and quality of the work done,whether it is by itself or by contractors,assigns or agencies. If Grantee shall at any time be required, or plan, to excavate trenches in any area covered by this franchise,the Grantee shall afford the City an opportunity to permit other franchisees and utilities to share such excavated trenches, provided that: (1) such joint use shall not unreasonably delay the work of the Grantee; and(2) such joint use shall not adversely affect Grantee's telecommunications facilities or safety thereof. Joint users will be required to contribute to the costs of excavation and filling on a pro-rata basis. Section 9. Protection of Monuments. Grantee shall comply with applicable state laws relating to protection of monuments. Section 10. Tree Trimming. Grantee shall have the authority to conduct pruning and trimming for access to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way subject to compliance with the City Code. All such trimming shall be done at Grantee's sole cost and expense. Section 11. Emergency Response. Grantee shall, within 30 days' of the execution of this franchise, designate one or more responsible people and an emergency 24-hour on-call personnel, and the procedures to be followed when responding to an emergency. After being notified of an emergency, Grantee shall cooperate with the City to immediately respond with action to aid in the protection of the health and safety of the public. In the event Grantee refuses to promptly take the directed action or fails to fully comply with such direction, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent imminent injury or damages to persons or property, the City may take such actions as it believes are necessary to protect persons or property, and Grantee shall be responsible to reimburse the City for its costs and any expenses. Section 12. One-Call System. Pursuant to RCW 19.122, Grantee is responsible for becoming familiar with, and understanding, the provisions of Washington's One-Call statutes. Grantee shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the One-Call statutes. Section 13. Safety. All of Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way shall be constructed and maintained in a safe and operational condition. Grantee shall follow all safety codes and other applicable regulations in the installation, operation, and maintenance of the telecommunications facilities. Section 14. Movement of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities for Others. Whenever any third party shall have obtained permission from the City to use any right—of-way for the purpose of moving any building or other oversized structure, Grantee, upon at least 14 days' written notice from the City, shall move, at the expense of the third party desiring to move the building or structure, any of Grantee's telecommunications facilities that may obstruct the movement thereof; provided,that the path for moving such building or structure is the path of least interference to Grantee's telecommunications facilities, as determined by the City. Upon good cause shown by Grantee, the City may require more than 14 days' notice to Grantee to move its telecommunications facilities. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 5 of 14 DRAFT Section 15. Acquiring New Telecommunications Facilities. Upon Grantee's acquisition of any new telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way, or upon any addition or annexation to the City of any area in which Grantee retains any such telecommunications facilities in the rights-of-way, Grantee shall submit to the City a written statement describing all telecommunications facilities involved, whether authorized by franchise or any other form of prior right, and specifying the location of all such facilities. Such facilities shall immediately be subject to the terms of this franchise. Section 16. Dangerous Conditions - Authority of City to Abate. Whenever excavation, installation, construction, repair, maintenance, or relocation of telecommunications facilities authorized by this franchise has caused or contributed to a condition that substantially impairs the lateral support of the adjoining right-of-way, road, street or other public place, or endangers the public, adjoining public or private property or street utilities, the City may direct Grantee, at Grantee's sole expense, to take all necessary actions to protect the public and property. The City may require that such action be completed within a prescribed time. In the event that Grantee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the City, or fails to fully comply with such directions, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action, the City may enter upon the property and take such actions as are necessary to protect the public, adjacent public or private property, or street utilities, or to maintain the lateral support thereof, and all other actions deemed by the City to be necessary to preserve the public safety and welfare; and Grantee shall be liable to the City for all costs and expenses thereof to the extent caused by Grantee. Section 17. Hazardous Substances. Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, regulations and orders concerning hazardous substances relating to Grantee's telecommunications facilities in the rights—of-way. Grantee agrees to indemnify the City against any claims, costs, and expenses, of any kind,whether direct or indirect, incurred by the City arising out of the release or threat of release of hazardous substances caused by Grantee's ownership or operation of its telecommunications facilities within the City's rights-of-way. Section 18. Environmental. Grantee shall comply with all environmental protection laws, rules, recommendations, and regulations of the United States and the State of Washington, and their various subdivisions and agencies as they presently exist or may hereafter be enacted, promulgated, or amended, and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all damages arising, or which may arise, or be caused by, or result from the failure of Grantee fully to comply with any such laws, rules, recommendations, or regulations, whether or not Grantee's acts or activities were intentional or unintentional. Grantee shall further indemnify the City against all losses, costs, and expenses (including legal expenses) which the City may incur as a result of the requirement of any government or governmental subdivision or agency to clean and/or remove any pollution caused or permitted by Grantee,whether said requirement is during the term of the franchise or subsequent to its termination. Section 19. Relocation of Telecommunications Facilities. Grantee agrees and covenants, at its sole cost and expense, to protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate or remove from any street any of its telecommunications facilities when so required by the City in accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.99.060, provided that Grantee shall in all such cases have the privilege to temporarily bypass, in the authorized portion of the same street upon approval by the City, any section of its telecommunications facilities required to be temporarily disconnected or removed. If the City determines that the project necessitates the relocation of Grantee's then- existing telecommunications facilities,the City shall: Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 6 of 14 DRAFT A) At least 60 days' prior to the commencement of such improvement project, provide Grantee with written notice requiring such relocation; and B) Provide Grantee with copies of pertinent portions of the plans and specifications for such improvement project and a proposed location for Grantee's telecommunications facilities so that Grantee may relocate its telecommunications facilities in other City rights-of-way in order to accommodate such improvement project. C) After receipt of such notice and such plans and specifications, Grantee shall complete relocation of its telecommunications facilities at no charge or expense to the City so as to accommodate the improvement project in accordance with RCW 35.99.060(2). Grantee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its telecommunications facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such alternatives and advise Grantee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to accommodate the work which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the telecommunications facilities. If so requested by the City, Grantee shall submit additional information to assist the City in making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by Grantee full and fair consideration. In the event the City ultimately determines that there is no other reasonable alternative, Grantee shall relocate its telecommunications facilities as otherwise provided in this section. The provisions of this section shall in no manner preclude or restrict Grantee from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation of its telecommunications facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the telecommunications facilities to be constructed by said person or entity are not or will not become City owned, operated or maintained facilities,provided that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project. If the City or a contractor for the City is delayed at any time in the progress of the work by an act or neglect of the Grantee or those acting for or on behalf of Grantee, then Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees to the extent arising out of or in connection with such delays, except for delays and damages caused by the City. This provision may not be waived by the parties except in writing. Section 20. Abandonment of Grantee's Telecommunications Facilities. No facility constructed or owned by Grantee may be abandoned without the express written consent of the City,which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City has discretion and authority to direct Grantee to remove a facility abandoned by Grantee (whether or not the entity had permission to abandon the facility) and restore the rights-of-way to their pre-removal condition when: (a) a City project involves digging that will encounter the abandoned facility; (b) the abandoned facility poses a hazard to the health, safety, or welfare of the public; (c)the abandoned facility is 24 inches or less below the surface of the rights-of-way and the City is reconstructing or resurfacing a street over the rights-of-way; or(d)the abandoned facility has collapsed, broke,or otherwise failed. Grantee may, upon written approval by the City, delay removal of the abandoned facility until such time as the City commences a construction project in the rights-of-way unless (b) or(d) above applies. When (b) or(d) applies, Grantee shall remove the abandoned facility from the rights-of-way as soon as weather conditions allow,unless the City expressly allows otherwise in writing. The expense of the removal, and restoration of improvements in the rights-of-way that were damaged by the facility or by the removal process, shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantee. If Grantee fails to Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 7 of 14 DRAFT remove the abandoned facilities in accordance with the above, then the City may incur costs to remove the abandoned facilities and restore the rights-of-way, and is entitled to reimbursement from Grantee for such costs,including reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Section 21. Maps and Records Required. Grantee shall provide the City,at no cost to the City: A) A route map that depicts the general location of the Grantee's telecommunications facilities placed in the rights-of-way. The route map shall identify telecommunications facilities as aerial or underground and is not required to depict cable types, number of fibers or cables, electronic equipment, and service lines to individual subscribers. Grantee shall also provide an electronic map of the aerial/underground telecommunications facilities in relation to the right-of-way centerline reference to allow the City to add this information to the City's Geographic Information System ("GIS") program. The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1, annually. B)In connection with the construction of any City project, Grantee shall provide to the City,upon the City's reasonable request, copies of available drawings in use by Grantee showing the location of such telecommunications facilities. Grantee shall field locate its telecommunications facilities in order to facilitate design and planning of City improvement projects. C) Upon written request of the City, Grantee shall provide the City with the most recent update available of any plan of potential improvements to its telecommunications facilities within the franchise area; provided, however, any such plan so submitted shall be deemed confidential and for informational purposes only, and shall not obligate Grantee to undertake any specific improvements within the franchise area. The information in this subsection shall be delivered to the City by December 1, annually. D) In addition to the requirements of subsection 1 of this section,the parties agree to periodically share GIS files upon written request, provided Grantee's GIS files are to be used solely by the City for governmental purposes. Any files provided to Grantee shall be restricted to information required for Grantee's engineering needs for construction or maintenance of telecommunications facilities that are the subject of this franchise. Grantee is prohibited from selling any GIS information obtained from City to any third parties. E) Public Disclosure Act. Grantee acknowledges that information submitted to the City may be subject to inspection and copying under the Washington Public Disclosure Act codified in chapter 42.56 RCW. Grantee shall mark as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" each page or portion thereof of any documentation/information which it submits to the City and which it believes is exempt from public inspection or copying. The City agrees to timely provide Grantee with a copy of any public disclosure request to inspect or copy documentation/information which the Grantee has provided to the City and marked as "PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL" prior to allowing any inspection and/or copying as well as provide the Grantee with a time frame, consistent with RCW 42.56.520, to provide the City with its written basis for non-disclosure of the requested documentation/information. In the event the City disagrees with the Grantee's basis for non-disclosure, the City agrees to withhold release of the requested documentation/ information in dispute for a reasonable amount of time to allow Grantee an opportunity to file a legal action under RCW 42.56.540. Section 22. Limitation on Future Work. In the event that the City constructs a new street or reconstructs an existing street, Grantee shall not be permitted to excavate such street except as set forth in the City's then-adopted regulations relating to street cuts and excavations. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 8 of 14 DRAFT Section 23. Reservation of Rights by City. The City reserves the right to refuse any request for a permit to extend telecommunications facilities. Any such refusal shall be supported by a written statement from the Public Works Director that extending the telecommunications facilities, as proposed, would interfere with the public health, safety or welfare. Section 24. Remedies to Enforce Compliance. In addition to any other remedy provided herein,the City reserves the right to pursue any remedy to compel or force Grantee and/or its successors and assigns to comply with the terms hereof, and the pursuit of any right or remedy by the City shall not prevent the City from thereafter declaring a forfeiture or revocation for breach of the conditions herein. Section 25. City Ordinances and Regulations. Nothing herein shall be deemed to direct or restrict the City's ability to adopt and enforce all necessary and appropriate ordinances regulating the performance of the conditions of this franchise, including any reasonable ordinances made in the exercise of its police powers in the interest of public safety and for the welfare of the public. The City shall have the authority at all times to control by appropriate regulations the location, elevation, and manner of construction and maintenance of any telecommunications facilities by Grantee, and Grantee shall promptly conform with all such regulations,unless compliance would cause Grantee to violate other requirements of law. In the event of a conflict between the Municipal Code and this franchise,City Code shall control. Section 26. Vacation. The City may vacate any City road, right-of-way or other City property which is subject to rights granted by this franchise in accordance with state and local law. Any relocation of telecommunications facilities resulting from a street vacation shall require a minimum of 180 days' notice as provided in section 37. In the event of a street vacation, the City shall include in the vacation ordinance a reserved easement for the continued location of Grantee's facilities. Section 27. Indemnification. A) Grantee hereby covenants not to bring suit and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards or liability to any person arising from injury, sickness or death of any person or damage to property of any nature whatsoever relating to or arising out of this franchise agreement; except for injuries and damages caused solely by the negligence of the City. This includes but is not limited to injury: 1) For which the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing the activities authorized by a franchise are a proximate cause; 2)By virtue of Grantee's exercise of the rights granted herein; 3) By virtue of the City permitting Grantee's use of the City's rights-of-ways or other public property; 4) Based upon the City's inspection or lack of inspection of work performed by Grantee, its agents and servants, officers or employees in connection with work authorized on the facility or property over which the City has control,pursuant to a franchise or pursuant to any other permit or approval issued in connection with a franchise; 5) Arising as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee, its agents, servants, officers or employees in barricading, instituting trench safety systems or providing other Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 9 of 14 DRAFT adequate warnings of any excavation,construction or work upon the facility, in any right- of-way, or other public place in performance of work or services permitted under a franchise; or 6) Based upon radio frequency emissions or radiation emitted from Grantee's equipment located upon the facility, regardless of whether Grantee's equipment complies with applicable federal statutes and/or FCC regulations related thereto. B) Grantee's indemnification obligations pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall include assuming liability for actions brought by Grantee's own employees and the employees of Grantee's agents, representatives, contractors and subcontractors even though Grantee might be immune under RCW Title 51 from direct suit brought by such an employee. It is expressly agreed and understood that this assumption of potential liability for actions brought by the aforementioned employees is limited solely to claims against the City arising by virtue of Grantee's exercise of the rights set forth in a franchise. The obligations of Grantee under this subsection have been mutually negotiated by the parties, and Grantee acknowledges that the City would not enter into a franchise without Grantee's waiver. To the extent required to provide this indemnification and this indemnification only,Grantee waives its immunity under RCW Title 51. C) Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by Grantee at the time of completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of indemnification. Provided,that Grantee has been given prompt written notice by the City of any such claim, said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims which are not reduced to a suit and any claims which may be compromised prior to the culmination of any litigation or the institution of any litigation. The City has the right to defend or participate in the defense of any such claim, and has the right to approve any settlement or other compromise of any such claim. D) In the event that Grantee refuses the tender of defense in any suit or any claim, said tender having been made pursuant to this section, and said refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter), to have been a wrongful refusal on the part of Grantee,then Grantee shall pay all of the City's costs for defense of the action, including all reasonable expert witness fees, reasonable attorney fees, the reasonable costs of the City of recovering under this subsection. E) Grantee's duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City against liability for damages caused by the concurrent negligence of(a) City or City's agents, employees, or contractors, and (b) Grantee or Grantee's agents, employees, or contractors, shall apply only to the extent of the negligence of Grantee or Grantee's agents, employees, or contractors. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a franchise is subject to the provisions of RCW 4.24.115, the parties agree that the indemnity provisions hereunder shall be deemed amended to conform to said statute and liability shall be allocated as provided herein. F)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, Grantee assumes the risk of damage to its telecommunication facilities located in the rights-of-way and upon City-owned property from activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees and contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from any willful or malicious action or gross negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents,employees or contractors. Grantee releases and waives any and all such claims against the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Grantee further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City against any claims for damages, including, but not limited to, business interruption damages and lost profits, brought by or under users of Grantee's facilities as the result of any interruption of service due to Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 10 of 14 DRAFT damage or destruction of Grantee's facilities caused by or arising out of activities conducted by the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused by or arises from the sole negligence or any willful or malicious actions on the part of the City,its officers,agents,employees or contractors. G) The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this franchise. Section 28. Insurance. Grantee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the franchise, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights,privileges and authority granted hereunder to Grantee,its agents,representatives or employees. Grantee's maintenance of insurance as required by this franchise shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A) Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. This insurance shall cover all owned, non- owned, hired or leased vehicles used in relation to this franchise. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO)form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary,the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage; and B) Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01,or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage acceptable to the City, and shall cover products liability. The City shall be named as an insured under Grantee's Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured-State or Political Subdivisions-Permits CG 20 12 or a substitute endorsement acceptable to the City providing equivalent coverage. Coverage shall be written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than$1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per occurrence and$2,000,000 general aggregate for personal injury,bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations; broad form property; explosion, collapse and underground(XCU); and Employer's Liability. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance: A)Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City as outlined in the Indemnification section of this franchise. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be in excess of Grantee's insurance and shall not contribute with it. B) Grantee's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled,except after 30 days' prior written notice has been given to the City. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best rating of not less than A:VII. Grantee shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of any amendatory endorsements, including the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Grantee prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 11 of 14 DRAFT Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies required herein shall not affect coverage provided to the City,its officers,officials,employees or volunteers. Section 29. Performance Bond Relating to Construction Activity. Before undertaking any of the work, installation, improvements, construction, repair, relocation or maintenance authorized by this franchise, Grantee,or any parties Grantee contracts with to perform labor in the performance of this franchise, shall, upon the request of the City, furnish a bond executed by Grantee or Grantee's contractors and a corporate surety authorized to operate a surety business in the State of Washington, in such sum as may be set and approved by the City,not to exceed$25,000, as sufficient to ensure performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise. The bond shall be conditioned so that Grantee shall observe all the covenants,terms and conditions and shall faithfully perform all of the obligations of this franchise, and to repair or replace any defective work or materials discovered in the City's road, streets,or property. Said bond shall remain in effect for the life of this franchise. In the event Grantee proposes to construct a project for which the above-mentioned bond would not ensure performance of Grantee's obligations under this franchise, the City is entitled to require such larger bond as may be appropriate under the circumstances. Section 30. Modification. The City and Grantee hereby reserve the right to alter, amend or modify the terms and conditions of this franchise upon written agreement of both parties to such alteration, amendment or modification. Section 31. Forfeiture and Revocation. If Grantee willfully violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions of this franchise, or through willful or unreasonable negligence fails to heed or comply with any notice given Grantee by the City under the provisions of this franchise, and an adequate opportunity to cure the violation or non-compliance has been given in writing to Grantee, then Grantee shall, at the election of the City, forfeit all rights conferred hereunder and this franchise may be revoked or annulled by the City after a hearing held upon reasonable notice to Grantee. The City may elect, in lieu of the above and without any prejudice to any of its other legal rights and remedies,to obtain an order from the Spokane County Superior Court compelling Grantee to comply with the provisions of this franchise and to recover damages and costs incurred by the City by reason of Grantee's failure to comply. Section 32. Assignment. This franchise may not be assigned or transferred without the written approval of the City, except that Grantee can assign this franchise without approval of, but upon notice to the City from any parent, affiliate or subsidiary of Grantee or to any entity that acquires all or substantially all the assets or equity of Grantee,by merger, sale,consolidation or otherwise. Section 33. Acceptance. Not later than 60 days after passage of this Ordinance,Grantee shall accept the franchise herein by filing with the City Clerk an unconditional written acceptance thereof. Failure of Grantee to so accept this franchise within said period of time shall be deemed a rejection thereof by Grantee, and the rights and privileges herein granted shall, after the expiration of the 60-day period, absolutely cease,unless the time period is extended by ordinance duly passed for that purpose. Section 34. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of sections: 5, 6, 7, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 27, 28, 29, 37, 38 and 39 of this franchise shall be in addition to any and all other obligations and liabilities Grantee may have to the City at common law, by statute, by ordinance, or by contract, and shall survive termination of this franchise, and any renewals or extensions hereof. All of the provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements contained in this franchise shall further be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of Grantee and City and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of Grantee shall inure to their respective heirs, successors and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned herein. Section 35. Severability. If any section, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 12 of 14 DRAFT invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. In the event that any of the provisions of the franchise are held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,the City reserves the right to reconsider the grant of the franchise and may amend, repeal,add,replace or modify any other provision of the franchise,or may terminate the franchise. Section 36. Renewal. Application for extension or renewal of the term of this franchise shall be made no later than 180 days of the expiration thereof. In the event the time period granted by this franchise expires without being renewed by the City, the terms and conditions hereof shall continue in effect until this franchise is either renewed or terminated by the City. Section 37. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given by or to the parties under this franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise specified,in writing: The City: City of Spokane Valley Attn: City Clerk 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Grantee: Fatbeam Attn: Kim Devlin 2065 West Riverstone Drive, Suite 105 Coeur d'Alene,ID 83814 Phone: (509) 344-1008 Facsimile: (509) 344-1009 Section 38. Choice of Law. Any litigation between the City and Grantee arising under or regarding this franchise shall occur, if in the state courts, in the Spokane County Superior Court, and if in the federal courts,in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Section 39. Non-Waiver. The City shall be vested with the power and authority to reasonably regulate the exercise of the privileges permitted by this franchise in the public interest. Grantee shall not be relieved of its obligations to comply with any of the provisions of this franchise by reason of any failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance, nor does the City waive or limit any of its rights under this franchise by reason of such failure or neglect. Section 40. Entire Agreement. This franchise constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and acceptance hereof. This franchise shall also supersede and cancel any previous right or claim of Grantee to occupy the City roads as herein described. Section 41. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of the Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of ,2015. Dean Grafos,Mayor Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 13 of 14 DRAFT ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Accepted by Fatbeam: By: Name and official capacity The Grantee, Fatbeam, for itself, and for its successors and assigns, does accept all of the terms and conditions of the foregoing franchise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has signed this day of_ 2015. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of ,2015. Notary Public in and for the State of residing in My commission expires Ordinance 15-014 Fatbeam Telecommunications Franchise Page 14 of 14 y!l�•[. 'INN ,�' = re+��`c`ice-: '�' , [,"i - • Exhibit ..A.. `' lotr "• •,... a ", EMAN - Spokane Valley, WA • F ,.•,,,,,,,,,, •-. -.- z } " s � Y � �e ?r mA _ �M •fi � tr- - ;/ � .dlf�' Y r R N�".�.. ,y.f - �L r _ i.. ` µ i� 1"fir '_l4\ 1. '4•,e. _ f .r • yy --0' 'I [ y]:... �[i,.., •• •J' ,' 2 ,...s.--.7.1-..—.-.4 49s F"S. x4 rS gl, jt - Y r t3• ..,e,„. - I•� _ _ - -,.,1 .. ' fi 9. ..,-;.,,-0.--;'.'.--"-.1,-1-""-.. r. - - �mak _ - w1 • .1 .. i --4-•.7,-_ -.:••:- • jet ir ; r - .. g k � •„ t.r i ,r te-- 1 , 1i • [ x— { l■ --Az ,4 Wig,, . . Googleearth Ri r_ d Y. 1 , c . 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ® new business [' public hearing [' information ❑ admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 15-006 adopting indigent defense standards. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 10.101.030. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report on June 30, 2015. BACKGROUND: The City contracts with Spokane County for indigent defense (public defender services), and has since incorporation in 2003. RCW 10.101.030 requires the City to adopt minimum standards for the delivery of indigent defense. Since incorporation, the City has relied on the indigent defense standards adopted by Spokane County. The City was recently advised by the Washington State Office of Public Defense that we need to adopt our own standards to be in compliance with state law. Staff drafted these proposed standards based on applicable standards adopted by the Washington State Supreme Court, RCW 10.101.030, Spokane County's adopted standards, and standards adopted by the Washington State Defender's Association, a private trade group. An example of a standard adopted by the state Supreme Court in the last several years relates to maximum caseloads for indigent defense attorneys in an effort to try to ensure indigent defendants receive appropriate legal representation. This has received considerable public discussion because of the projected cost to cities and counties. OPTIONS: (1) Approve Resolution 15-006 adopting indigent defense standards; or (2) seek additional information. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move we approve Resolution 15-006 adopting Spokane Valley indigent defense standards. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: These standards, on their own, are not anticipated to have a financial impact because they are all essentially already being used by Spokane County to provide indigent defense to City residents. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Resolution 15-006 adopting indigent defense standards, with six pages of attached standards. DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 15-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING STANDARDS FOR THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES PURSUANT TO RCW 10.101.030, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, RCW 10.101.030 requires that the City adopt standards for the delivery of public defense services to meet the needs of public defense service recipients for sufficient, accessible, high quality defense services; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Supreme Court and Washington State Bar Association have adopted minimum standards to establish guidance for local jurisdictions in meeting the statutory requirements; and WHEREAS, the City currently contracts with Spokane County for the provision of indigent defense through the Interlocal Agreement for Public Defender Services in the City of Spokane Valley, executed March 24,2006; and WHEREAS, Spokane County has adopted indigent defense standards for individuals charged with misdemeanor crimes which are substantially similar to the standards contained herein; and WHEREAS, at such time that the City may choose to provide these services by City staff, the City could consider amending these standards accordingly. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, that pursuant to RCW 10.101.030, the City Council hereby adopts the Spokane Valley Indigent Defense Delivery Standards, attached hereto and incorporation herein, which may be amended from time-to-time by subsequent resolution as may be appropriate or necessary. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Adopted this day of July,2015. City of Spokane Valley Dean Grafos, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution No. 15-006 Adopting Indigent Defense Standards SPOKANE VALLEY INDIGENT DEFENSE DELIVERY STANDARDS These Indigent Defense Delivery Standards are drafted based primarily upon the requirements of RCW 10.101.030, and the Standards for Indigent Defense, adopted by the Washington State Supreme Court on June 15, 2012. Lastly, the Washington Public Defender Association has adopted standards to provide guidance in those areas not specifically addressed by RCW 10.101.030 or the Washington Supreme Court's Standards for Indigent Defense. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of these Spokane Valley Indigent Defense Delivery Standards (Indigent Defense Standards)the following terms,phrases,words, and their derivations shall mean as follows: "Case" means the filing of a document with the court naming a person as defendant or respondent, to which an attorney is appointed in order to provide representation. In courts of limited jurisdiction multiple citations from the same incident can be counted as one case. "Board"means the Board of Commissioners of Spokane County. "Public Defender's Office" means the office of the Spokane County Public Defender, which is a department of Spokane County, organized pursuant to chapter 36.26 RCW, and which provides indigent defense service to the City of Spokane Valley pursuant to an interlocal agreement. "Public Defense Attorneys" means attorneys employed in the Public Defender's Office or attorneys employed in the separate department of Spokane County called Counsel for Defense. "Public Defense Contractors" means attorneys who are not full-time permanent employees of the Public Defender's Office or Counsel for Defense and who have agreed to represent indigent defendants which the Public Defender's Office and Counsel for Defense cannot represent. STANDARD ONE: COMPENSATION Public Defense Contractors should be compensated commensurate with the complexity of the case assigned and time required for the case. There may be provision for extraordinary compensation for cases which require an unusual measure of time or expertise. The actual salary levels shall be set by Spokane County. STANDARD TWO: DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS AND PUBLIC DEFENSE CONTRACTORS Public Defense Attorneys' and Public Defense Contractors' primary and most fundamental responsibility is to promote and protect the best interests of the client. Representation to all clients shall be provided in a professional, skilled manner consistent with minimum standards set forth by applicable Washington State Bar Association standards, the Rules of Professional Conduct, case law, applicable court rules defming the duties of counsel and the rights of defendants in criminal cases,and the American Bar Association. STANDARD THREE: LIMITS AND TYPES OF CASES Caseload limits and types of cases for Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors should allow each attorney to give each client the time and effort necessary to ensure quality Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 1 of 6 representation. No Public Defense Attorney or Public Defense Contractor should accept workloads that, by reason of their excessive size,interfere with the rendering of quality representation. A Public Defense Contractor shall not allow his or her private law practice to interfere with the representation of indigent defendants. (A) Subject only to the considerations of this Standard Three, in a one-year period, no full time Public Defense Attorney should be expected to handle more than 300 misdemeanor cases per attorney per year or, in jurisdictions that have not adopted a numerical case weighting system as described in this Standard,400 cases per year. Neither the Public Defender's Office nor the Counsel for Defense Office has adopted a numerical case weighting system for misdemeanor cases. (B) A Public Defense Contractor attorney should not be assigned more than a pro-rata share of public defense cases in a one-year period, in proportion to that attorney's additional private practice cases. For example, a Public Defense Contractor attorney with a public defense contract of 150 misdemeanor cases per year shall not have more than a half-time private practice caseload. (C) Supplemental standards adopted by the Washington Public Defender Association also address the number of cases attorneys providing public defense services can effectively handle including, but not limited to,the following: (1)The severity and complexity of the case; (2)The prosecutor's resources and practices; (3)The location of the jail and courts relative to the attorney's office; (4) The availability of diversionary tracks such as drug court, therapeutic mental health court, and community relicensing programs; (5)The docketing practices of the local courts; (6)The definition of a"case;" and (7)The availability of support staff and limited practice personnel. The Public Defender's Office and Counsel for Defense utilize these supplemental standards in the operation of their respective offices. If the total number of cases handled by Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractor attorneys considered together for a given calendar year exceed 110 percent of the caseloads specified in this Section, or are less than 90 percent of the caseloads specified in this Section in a given calendar year, then the Board and the Spokane County Public Defender shall confer and consider adopting various strategies to address the increase or decrease in caseload. As previously stated, neither the Public Defender's Office nor the Counsel for Defense utilize a case weighting system for its misdemeanor cases, and thus,the City does not adopt numerical case weighting. However,the Public Defender's Office uses an hourly calendaring system for the arraignment docket. At the arraignment docket, defendants may receive an early resolution offer for diversion of the criminal charges, or a reduction to a non-criminal infraction. In the event of an early resolution, the Public Defender's Office utilizes an hourly calendar system whereby case counts depend on how many early resolutions each attorney can handle on an hourly basis. Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 2 of 6 STANDARD FOUR: EXPERT EXPENSES Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors shall have reasonable resources for expert witnesses necessary for preparation and presentation of the defense of the case. Funds for expert witnesses shall be maintained separately from funds provided for expert services. Public Defense Contractors' requests for expert witness fees under Court Rule 3.1(f) may be made through an ex parte motion. The defense should be free to choose the expert of its choosing and in no case should be forced to select experts from a list pre-approved by either the court or the prosecution. STANDARD FIVE: ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Funding for the Public Defender's Office and Counsel for Defense shall include funding for administrative costs associated with providing legal representation such as travel, telephones and adequate telephone service, law library including electronic legal research, case management systems, computers and software, office space and supplies, training, meeting the reporting requirements imposed by the Washington State Supreme Court standards, and other costs necessarily incurred in the day-to-day management of the offices. Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractor attorneys shall have access to an office that accommodates confidential meetings with clients,as well as a postal address. STANDARD SIX: INVESTIGATORS Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractor attorneys shall use investigation services as appropriate. STANDARD SEVEN: SUPPORT SERVICES Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors shall be adequately staffed with administrative assistance and paralegals, as well as have access to mental health professionals and interpreters. Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors should seek to employ a minimum of one administrative assistant for every four attorneys. STANDARD EIGHT: REPORTS OF ATTORNEY ACTIVITY AND VOUCHERS Attorneys employed by Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors shall maintain a case- reporting and management information system which tracks the number and type of cases, attorney hours, and disposition of cases. This information shall be available to the Washington State Administrator of the Courts. Provided, attorneys employed by Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractors shall not be required to provide any information that compromises client confidentiality. STANDARD NINE: TRAINING As a condition of being licensed to practice law in the State of Washington, attorneys are required to attend at least 15 hours of legal training each year. For Public Defense Attorneys, at least seven training hours each year shall be in criminal defense. Public Defense Contractor attorneys should maintain updated manuals for specific areas of practice within their offices, and shall document an orientation for newly hired attorneys. Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 3 of 6 Public Defense Contractor attorneys should document at least five hours of required training annually in the specific area of criminal defense being provided under the contract. STANDARD TEN: SUPERVISION The Public Defender's Office and Counsel for Defense should provide one full-time supervising attorney for every 10 staff attorneys,and one half-time supervisor for every five attorneys. STANDARD ELEVEN: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF ATTORNEYS There should be a systematic procedure for monitoring and evaluating the performance of Public Defense Attorneys and Public Defense Contractor attorneys. Such evaluations should be performed by supervisors on a regular basis, be according to published criteria, include review of time and caseload records, in-court observations, review and inspection of transcripts where possible,review of case files, and should consider any comments of judges,prosecutors, other defense attorneys,and clients. Attorneys shall be evaluated on their skill and effectiveness as trial lawyers as well as their organizational abilities. STANDARD TWELVE: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS OR ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT Public Defense Contractors shall not subcontract with another attorney or firm to provide representation, and shall remain directly involved in the representation of assigned clients. Public Defender Contractors shall provide the names and qualifications of the attorneys who will be directly representing the clients to the Public Defender's Office, and ensure that such attorneys meet the minimum requirements set forth in these standards. Any agreement between the Public Defender's Office and Public Defender Contractors shall address the continued representation of assigned clients at the expiration of the Agreement. STANDARD THIRTEEN: LIMITATION ON PRIVATE PRACTICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE CONTRACTOR ATTORNEYS Public Defender Contractor attorneys shall be limited in the amount of privately-retained work which they may accept, in proportion to the percentage of a full-time Public Defense Attorney caseload for which they contract,pursuant to Standard Three above. STANDARD FOURTEEN: QUALIFICATION OF ATTORNEYS (A) In order to ensure that indigent defendants receive the effective assistance of counsel to which they are constitutionally entitled, attorneys providing defense services shall meet at least the following minimum professional qualifications: (1) Satisfy the minimum requirements for practicing law in Washington as determined by the Washington Supreme Court; (2) Be familiar with the statutes, court rules, constitutional provisions, and case law relevant to their practice areas; Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 4 of 6 (3) Be familiar with the collateral consequences of a conviction, including possible immigration consequences and the possibility of civil commitment proceedings based on a criminal conviction; (4)Be familiar with mental health issues and be able to identify the need to obtain expert services; and (5) Complete seven hours of continuing legal education within each calendar year in courses relating to their public defense practice. (B) Contempt of Court Cases. Each attorney representing a respondent charged with contempt of court shall meet at least the following requirements: (1)Minimum requirements set forth in subsection(A) above; and (2) Each staff attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first three contempt of court hearings by a supervisor or more experienced attorney, or participate in at least one consultation per case with an attorney qualified in this area of practice. (C) Specialty Courts. Each attorney representing a client in a specialty court (e.g., mental health court,drug diversion court,homelessness court) shall meet at least the following requirements: (1)Minimum requirements set forth in subsection(A) above; (2)The requirements set forth above for representation in the type of practice involved in the specialty court(e.g.,felony,misdemeanor,juvenile); and (3)Be familiar with mental health and substance abuse issues and treatment alternatives. (D) RALJ (Rules for Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction) Misdemeanor Appeals to Superior Court. Each attorney who is counsel alone for a case on appeal to the Superior Court from Court of Limited Jurisdiction shall meet at least the following requirements: (1)Meet the minimum requirements as outlined in subsection(A) above; and (2) Have had significant training or experience in criminal appeals, criminal motions practice,extensive trial level briefing, clerking for an appellate judge,or assisting a more- experienced attorney in preparing and arguing an RALJ appeal. STANDARD FIFTEEN: DISPOSITION OF CLIENT COMPLAINTS The Public Defender's Office and Counsel for Defense shall promptly respond to clients who make complaints and should keep a written record of the complaints and the response. Complaints should be first directed to the attorney handling the case, then to a supervisor. If the complaint cannot be resolved by the office to which it is issued, the complainant shall be informed of other avenues including the courts or the bar association. Agreements with Public Defender Contractors who accept conflict cases shall include a procedure to respond to client complaints which meets this standard. STANDARD SIXTEEN: CAUSE FOR TERMINATION OR REMOVAL OF ATTORNEY Contracts with Public Defender Contractors should only be terminated prior to their expiration for cause, which could include failure of an attorney to render adequate representation to the client,willful disregard of the rights and best interests of the client,or willful disregard of the standards set forth herein. Representation in an individual case establishes an inviolable attorney-client relationship. Removing an attorney from a case should ordinarily not occur over the objection of the client. Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 5 of 6 STANDARD SEVENTEEN: NON-DISCRIMINATION The Public Defender's Office,Counsel for Defense, and Public Defense Contractors shall not discriminate in violation of applicable state or federal regulations in their hiring practices to provide public defense representation,in the attorneys selected to represent clients,or in their representation of clients. STANDARD EIGHTEEN: GUIDELINES FOR AWARDING DEFENSE CONTRACTS Contracts for public defense services may only be entered into with firms which meet accepted professional standards, and include awarding only to attorneys who have at least one year's experience in the jurisdiction covered by the contract, or to firms where at least one attorney performing the services under the contract has at least one year's experience in the jurisdiction covered by the contract. Indigent Defense Delivery Standards Page 6 of 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information [' admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: 2015 Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Call for Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP, June 23, 2015; Informational RCA, June 30, 2015; Admin Report, July 7, 2015. BACKGROUND: The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) issued a 2015 Call for Projects on June 1, 2015 for allocation of funding for the Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and Urban Sidewalk Program (SP). Approximately $87M is available statewide for funding the Urban Arterial Program (UAP). The anticipated funding levels for the Urban Arterial Program in the Northeast Region have increased from $8.3M last year to $9.6M this year. The East Region Urban Sidewalk Program decreased $1.1M from last year to $0.84M this year. Project applications are due Friday, August 21, 2015. Staff evaluated the TIB grant criteria and worked with TIB staff to identify projects that will score well and have a high potential to receive funding. Staff reviewed the adopted 2016-2021 Six- Year TIP, the Pavement Management Program, accident hot-spots, and other elements of the City's transportation network. Staff also coordinated project ideas with the Community and Economic Development Department staff. Based on this evaluation, the following preliminary list of projects was developed for submitting to TIB for consideration. In the PROJECT NAME 6-Yr TIP YEAR ESTIMATED TIP? PROJECT COST Urban Arterial Program Pines (SR-27) & Mirabeau Parkway Traffic Signal YES 2016 $350,000 McDonald Rd Pavement Preservation, 8th to NO N/A $1,300,000 Mission Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN) YES 2017 $2,108,000 Broadway at Argonne/Mullan Concrete YES 2019 $1,703,000 Intersections (CN Only) Urban Sidewalk Program Opportunity Elementary—SRTS (Bowdish Rd) YES 2018 $500,000 OPTIONS: 1) Approve the list of recommended projects for TIB grant applications as presented, or 2) Revise the list of projects for TIB grant applications. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to apply for TIB grants for the following projects: (1) Pines Road (SR-27) & Mirabeau Parkway Traffic Signal; (2) McDonald Road Pavement Preservation — 8th Avenue to Mission Avenue; (3) Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection; (4) Broadway Avenue at Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersection; (5) Opportunity Elementary Sidewalk (Bowdish Road). BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's match on TIB funded projects is typically 20% of the total project cost. As the proposed TIB applications are developed, staff will coordinate with the Finance Department to ensure there are sufficient City funds to provide the needed match for the proposed TIB projects. Right-of-way is not an eligible cost for sidewalk projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric P. Guth, PE — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Project Summary Sheets nlecx Mirabeau Pkwy & Pines (SR-27) Traffic Signal pokane Valley - ; ; (0, I rill" .:- --..„ - : -- : - -. - Mira beau Pkwy&Pines * _ (SR-27), Traffic Signal �. . " r , - - � z� ,�,`e'�- _ vrr. - ?I ••r, S:�mor sm� i . , 1: . Illitt , — . ., -4' Nf 7. OD- ek. 3!th .i.t ,' •i )' fi -- - - ( c a - - S . 41_• I. North Lh �r 5ahtl 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Mirabeau Pkwy& Pines(SR-27)Traffic Signal project installs a new traffic signal at the Mirabeau Pkwy and Pines(SR-27) in- tersection. New commercial development along Mirabeau Pkwy and increased traffic along Pines(SR-27) has made it increasingly difficult to access Mirabeau Pkwy during the morning peak hour and Pines Road during the evening peak hour. Benefits of Project: Installing a new traffic signal at Mirabeau Pkwy& Pines(SR-27)will increase the level-of-service at the intersection from LOS"F" to"LOS" B during the AM & PM Peak Hour. A failing LOS places the burden of mitigating this condition on new development which is oftentimes cost prohibitive. Installing a traffic signal at this location will encourage business to locate and develop along Mirabeau Pkwy, Pinecroft Way,and Cherry Street. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$30,000 Construction (CN)-$320,000 Total Project Cost—$350,000 DRAFT(7-7-2015) McDonald Rd Pavement Preservation, S`pokanne Valley _ AARZI sem , Spokane Valley - A� _` S; '' Mission Ave -3 _ �'w �I z , L _fgf • - McDonald Rd Pavement r- - -reservation,8th to Mission ! a ` x z F_t 7 VII dir ma _ � ra MN' • * I • `E Sprague Ave of —.q.. . a _I - _ . _■ , * 5. _ . tr �s r - c - i -�.7 Ct.1 A-'we - - _ .. L. '. 1� . , - ._" `'fy 7't to ave- L. -.. c - - a' er �., x� _ - L =.12th xve - -co _ .. _- a`�.-}my _ - r _ _ 1 3111 xve'.- w' • _ yr - � . .:mss.�cn'. Jr" 4 eh .n@� c ?SfJ1 !$G-2 �., __. _. tet' -} North u ! - 96th Ave m H ' - - - .` 'E -,.7,-...--- ,-,o r 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 k Project Description: This project will place a moderate overlay(1.5-2.5 inches)on McDonald Road from 8th to Sprague Avenue and a thin overlay(1.5 inches or less)from Sprague Avenue north to Mission. In addition,over 80 sidewalk curb ramps will be rebuilt to comply with current ADA requirements. This project will also upgrade the current stormwater system. Funding has been received for the pavement markings and signs needed to reconfigure McDonald Road from a 4-lane road section from Sprague Avenue to Mission to a 3-lane section with bike lanes, and add bike lanes south of Sprague to 16th Avenue using Highway Safety Improvement Funds. Benefits of Project: The McDonald Rd ROAD DIET project will enhance safety from Sprague to Mission by reducing accidents by at least 20%for all accident types. Providing new marked bike lanes along McDonald will give bicyclists excellent north-south access in the heart of the City and access to the Appleway Trail which provides excellent east-west access to the City's commercial core. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$133,000 RW—$1,000 Construction (CN)-$1,166,000 Total Project Cost—$1,300,000 Awarded$608,900 in HSIP to construct traffic components for Road Diet, this project is for pavement preservation and sidewalk ramps. DRAFT(7-7-2015) Euclid Concrete Intersection RW CN ` c.-.• �`` Sullivan /Euclid (RW/CN) — e �; t , - C ,fr it 1 — .•:_. Sullivan/Euclid Concrete . I i I - _-- ntersection(RW/CN}Project ! I IT. _- _ - -, :1110111M11611 r- uchd Ave. :+ _-- '. n . __. A. imMillat a —i ++�. i Tr dif —■■�I1 y • f •i n J _•1 -- --r i I•.,. a I — �, it -- - _ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the intersection of Sullivan Rd and Euclid Ave with Portland Cement Concrete and provide ADA up- grades as necessary. Benefits of Project: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting,ravelling and longitudinal cracking. Significant truck traffic continues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a de- signed depth to support the type of traffic using it will provide a long term solution to prevent pavement deterioration. This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive over the long run for the taxpayer. Project Cost Estimate: Right of Way(RW) =$26,000 Construction (CN)=$2,082,000 Total Estimated Construction and Right of Way cost=$2,108,000 DRAFT(7-7-2015) Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersection (CN only) _- _ ,,r polcane F Valls P R - I �. ay Cll. i RIz. ,1%z_ t� ' „� -=n __l_s1t tti _.___ - — - -a ' — - 11111i117-177 ` . ,t y s - / .4 :„,.., . .. _t --- - a c ' ,4- ,111 2016 2017 2018 1 2019 1 2020 2021 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the intersections of Broadway Avenue at Argonne and Mullan Roads with PCC pavement and provide ADA upgrades as necessary. Benefits of Project: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting,raveling and longitudinal cracking. Significant truck traffic continues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a de- signed depth to support the type of traffic using it will provide a long term solution to prevent further pavement deterioration. This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive for the taxpayer.The design life of the project is 30 years. Project Cost Estimate: Construction (CN)=$1,703,000 DRAFT(7-7-2015) Opportunity Elementary-SRTS (Bowdish Road) 000..\...., Val ley - ------. Otili , , _ 7.-cc_ . . ....r ,, — algilANIIWV 8th Ave ' w L - ... - �,:. " �� ...� - _ ,d fir. .. - m - 7. _ '�'�a_7- - _ .''•• �` �R'r� -_ r i • _ ` Bowdish Road r_;'its _ __�'' a •4 _ -�AT _ ". -4. - - !! t bPPORTUNITY A t 11th Ave , : ELEMENTARY w SCHOOL r . '+1. 041 '''7 '1 -r-i-I: 1lik -6:, • i_ rLHN * lifir 12th Ave . o 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project is a Safe Routes to School(SRTS) project that provides new sidewalks to the Opportunity Elementary School. New sidewalks will be installed along the east side of Bowdish Road beginning at 8th Avenue and ending at 12th.At 11th Avenue, new sidewalks will be installed on the south side of the street from Bowdish Road east to Wilbur Road. The project will include new curbing,a minimum 5'wide sidewalk, new ADA curb ramps at street corners,some roadway paving where new curbs will be be- yond the existing edge of road,some right-of-way acquisition,curb walls and stormwater facilities. Benefits of the Project: New sidewalks provide a safer route to school.Sidewalks build a sense of neighborhood and community and these sidewalks will hopefully reduce the number of cars dropping children off at school during the day. Sidewalks promote safety and encourages children and their parents to walk and be more active. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering =$90,000 Right of Way&Construction=$6,000 Construction=$404,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$500,000 DRAFT(7-7-2015) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Mullan Street Preservation Project#0224 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 17, 2014 Adopted 2015 Budget, Ordinance 14-015 which included this street preservation project; Information RCA on June 2, 2015. BACKGROUND: The Mullan Street Preservation project will place a two-inch asphalt overlay on Mullan Road between Sprague Avenue and Broadway Avenue along with Argonne Road between Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard. The pedestrian ramps will be updated, ITS conduit will be installed and the storm water facilities will be upgraded. This project is funded with $352,915 from Fund 311 for the street preservation work, $162,375 from Fund 303 for installation of ITS conduit and $36,745 from Fund 402 for stormwater improvements. Public Works staff designed the project. Bids were advertised on June 26 and were opened on Friday, July 10, 2015. A copy of the Bid Tabulation will be provided after the bid opening. OPTIONS: Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Mullan Street Preservation project, #0224 to in the amount of $ and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved the 2015 Budget with $2,615,050 in Fund 311 for Street Preservation projects. The overall budget for the Mullan Street Preservation Project is $552,035 with $352,915 from Fund 311, $162,375 from Fund 303 and $36,745 from Fund 402. The stormwater expenditures from Fund 402 are reimbursable by a Department of Ecology Stormwater grant. There are sufficient funds to cover the cost of this project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Confirmation of Mayoral Appointments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Various ordinances, resolutions, and state statutes. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Annually, the Mayor makes appointment recommendations to place councilmembers on various regional board and committees. At the January 13, 2015 Council meeting, several committee appointments were made by recommendation of the Mayor and confirmation of the Councilmembers. BACKGROUND: Due to Councilmember Bates' extended absence, Councilmember Higgins was appointed as an alternate for the Clean Air Agency. According to the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency bylaws, an alternate may not serve as the permanent chair of the board. Along with Councilmember Pace, Councilmember Bates was also a member of the Governance Committee. In order to review the Governance Manual with a full committee, it has been suggested that Councilmember Pro Tem Gothmann fill in on a temporary basis, on the Governance Committee. OPTIONS: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Councilmember Higgins as Board Member on the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency; and Councilmember Gothmann as Temporary Committee member on the Governance Committee. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Councilmember Higgins as Board Member on the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency; and Councilmember Gothmann as Temporary Committee member on the Governance Committee. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Grafos ATTACHMENTS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Ecology FY16 Stormwater Pre-Construction, Regional and Statewide Significance, and Capacity Grant Funding Programs Call for Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376; Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of 2016-2021 Stormwater CIP, June 9, 2015. BACKGROUND: On June 24, 2015, the Department of Ecology announced the opening of three grant programs to assist the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permitees in improving stormwater quality in Washington State. These three grant programs are the Storm water Pre-Construction Grant, Grants of Regional or Statewide Significance (GRSS), and the Stormwater Capacity Grants. Spokane Valley has several projects that would qualify and were included in the 2016-2021 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan (CI P) that was approved on June 9, 2015. The Stormwater Pre-Construction Grant candidates would include the (1) Appleway Improvements, Farr to University and (2) Chester Creek Diversions stormwater projects. Grant funds in this category are limited to $250,000 for each project to complete planning and design packages in 2016. Both of these projects would then be ready to compete for grant funding opportunities for construction beginning as early as 2017. With concurrence of City Council, and the city and county stormwater managers from across eastern Washington, staff would like to proceed with a grant application for the next two phases of Effectiveness Studies Development with the Grants of Regional or Statewide Significance (GRSS) call. This program would be for up to $300,000 of reimbursement to continue collaborative work in eastern Washington to meet permit requirements mutually. The first phase was recently completed using consultants which created, explored, and developed a number of study ideas among 24 eastern Washington permittees and staff from Ecology. Phase two would take those ideas, prioritize them, determine which permitted city or county would become lead agency, and determine an organizational structure for managing and funding the studies. The third phase would prepare a number of study designs and "quality assurance program plans." The grant would cover the costs of work that the City and 23 other eastern Washington cities and counties would have to perform to meet current permit requirements. The Stormwater Capacity Grants — because the City of Spokane Valley has a permit with the State for municipal stormwater discharges to surface waters, Ecology is offering a grant to help implement permit requirements of $50,000 during the following year. The City has received these grants in the past and has been reimbursed for street sweeping, manhole cover replacements, and needed detection and mapping equipment. Staff would like to utilize the majority of this funding source to help update the permit required "Stormwater Management Program Plan." In Summary, we suggest applying for grants as follows: A. Pre-Construction: (1) Appleway, Farr to University; and (2) Chester Creek Diversions (Bowdish to University) B. Regional or Statewide Significance: Effectiveness Study Development Phases 2 and 3 C. Capacity Grant: to help City update Stormwater Program Plan Application deadline for these grant programs is July 30, 2015. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to place this item on the July 28, 2015 Council agenda for motion consideration to include the proposed list of applications as noted above or modified. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: These grant funds require no match for eligible expenses; therefore, there will not be any anticipated budget or financial impacts to the City of Spokane Valley unless Council would like to add on landscaping improvements to the Appleway project to extend from Dishman-Mica to Farr Roads. STAFF CONTACT: Eric P. Guth, PE — Public Works Director Art Jenkins, PE —Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: July 2015 Stormwater Grant Call Presentation Ma 3./ MM,.=, f ,aa •,. SpOUane 0011.111011111 mixii DEPARTMENT OF 4.0.01/alley ® ECOLOGY State of Washington 0 ° Stormwater 4L " di Call For Projects , . i July 2015 11 Public Works Department Stormwater Utility i 2 Ecology Grant Call Q Issued June 24, 2015 o Due July 30, 2015 3 Grant Calls: Pre-Construction (Green Infrastructure) Regional or Statewide Significance (GRSS) Capacity (to implement permit requirements) 3 Pre-Construction ( Green Retrofit) Covers costs in Design and Planning 100% reimbursable for eligible costs, Up to $250,000 for each project Prepare for August 2016 grant call for construction phase Suggest: Appleway, Farr to University Chester Creek Diversions (Bowdish to University) 4 Appleway Improvements , Farr to University , , ,T �` r " n `` 0 Summer 2015: Propose as Ixo _ "Green Retrofit" Project ( 100% Y ' design grant) for portion of i•--i--N . P- e------ft., t.41,-.., ii- .,, - - .., , , pp eway meeting criteria . o� oo FL , _ -alma!. = Coordinate w/Appleway Trail oQP va - . Pr'PJune 2016: 50%-90% Design , „AL __„,„„,.... Aug 2016: Grant application for construction Suggest 50/50 split between Street and Stormwater Funds �= to convert existing dryland s s swales not covered by grant _. 5 Appleway Current Frontage, Farr11 niversity - 5,876 ft (Phase 3B) • =FJFF 'S S 0 E y UHG2i,TY rri,;c R R {4 R ' - A fewa \LiL PP Y R tII Fr R, ,' R d RU= hear G,VLIr,�aro• JN R ////// ,.,LNrtFDFRET±;CCI8TH71 R 'R 'R R1 R' R h='_f �il '14AY RT 2, S'.7VVI+SL NIT,.,'fT .'G 7' F.MmE dV STLmFPOW;TIJ r R9`TACPFDR§TI(1�� .LC W�nf?k 4'FL'-YMY Hi'F_�`3rS;LC R1- - ��R 175=I 3` -a,-.';__ TACT-sa 3:` Ri . hff'ph, h rtz..i I P ` . 73 ' Color 1 Type Frontage I go I Grant Est. Project IrUn-Improved 3,128 ft $130,000 $390,000 $520,000 Dry Swales to Irrigated 1 ,420 ft $240,000 $0 $240,000 Exist Irrig. Area to Swale 1 ,260 ft $1 10,000 $1 10,000 $220,000 IIII Exist Irrig. Swale 68 ft 3 $0 $0 $0 laTotals: 5,876 ft $480,000 $500,000 $980,000 6 Chester Creek Diversions Remove up to 5 culverts discharging to Chester Creek Located along Dishman-Mica between Bowdish and University Roads Best value to City to meet current NPDES permit requirements I S �--� City of Millwood � I_ — Q !.- �' *, 1 i ! i City of Spokane j I 4 S� Sullivan Bridges j d City of Spokane Valley 8th& Havana 4— �,f'j-J ) j -�� Lj iJig • //). C r 7`w �,_____ __-'7.--"'-'\111 . -1 — 6� • f P- IL . , ,___. . t-- 14th &Glenrose Drain - . ...\,.... .._\..1 lillilik,:_, _ • 14th & Havana /-'-1 r) ` __.1 `' Chester Creek Diversions C -Q1 .\\-- ''' \ \ --- r r7A I I ` pokane Count N 4 J I . L, .4 ..„ _. : ...,: - —� L. 44th Diversion .,,o Ponderosa Diversions SW Basin & Discharge Map i 8 ° { Mar 34 2011 Basin 10 _ "r k 'R f' ,_ SFO iIIl�'e 'y' Public Works N. w _ Valley. Department f �' Notice:The Information shown on this map Is compiled from various sources and Is riktL „l . #„ 4 subJecttoconstant revision,The City makes no claims or guarantees about the doth Au accuracy or currency of this map and expressly disclaims liability far errors and omissions in Its contents.Toone rm accuracy contact the city of Spokane Valley, Public Works Department 1504)921.1000. Discharge Point Types M84 Basin Types 4111 MS4 Regulated 113 Regulated MS4 4 MS4 Exemption Eligible .4 MS4 Ground Infiltration Exemption Eligible • OtherGovernment WA. Ground MS4 I> Private R MaturaUPrivate NM. - Conveyances L` 1 t t ----ditch Basin 11 •ra:. - drainageway City Boundary a ,i' y 14 / Q-pipe/culvert City of Spokane Valley / SW Treatment Facilities Surface waterbodies / CSV of the State "ilk/ Private dtherGovemment a Y Basin Information - i/ 1Basin No.: 11 ,..,,, $ Size(acres): 9.4 `O / j Est.Population Served: 130 Basin Zoning Sh Co;. 1 0%Industrial hs 6 i .. re`Cr 14 ,Rd`► is 100%Commercial 0%High/Med Density Residential 0%Low Density Residential i•, MS4 Type: Exemption Elkilble oQ `a. 110 55 a 110 sr�lc; D12 - Feet "ys i411111oa. ; w r SW Basin Map No.: 11 9 Regional or Statewide Significance ( GRSS ) Up to $300,000 100% reimbursable for eligible expenses Complete by March 30, 2017 Helps meet permit requirements Suggest: Effectiveness Study - Development Phases 2 & 3 10 EffecT ivness Study Development Updc PHASE 1 : PHASE 2/3: Started December 2013 GRSS Grant Application 7/30/ 15 Meetings with stormwater Start December 2015 permit managers representing Prioritize List (choose 8+ studies) 24 communities in eastern Agree on Cities/Counties to Washington lead the 8+ studies chosen Herrera Environmental Perform study designs and Consultants hired to facilitate quality assurance project plans Completed June 30, 2015 per Ecology requirements for 4-6 Developed 24 study ideas to priority studies choose from, including Complete by March 30, 2017 estimated total costs 11 S8 . B StudyImplementation Process Path By June 30, ' By Dec 30, ' Updated July 2015 2013-2015 2016 2017 (+/-) , CQmplMed �r yep G.iant 20 1 5 Until Studies July are Complete = 11 Phase II r r Phase IV s PartnershiP • 100% ECY Grant • LAs finalize Study Study Work • 12-15 Study Ideas (SIs) Designs (SD) for 8-12 SIs •ID Lead Agencies (LAs) b 6/30/2017 • ListWays to Fund SIs •Rank/Submit 12 15 SIs ( y ) • Perform Studies • Tools to decide how to • ECY REVIEW • Interim Reporting •ID Funding partnerships participate in • QAPP for each SD • EIM data entry "regional studies" •Grant apps for final within 6 months of ECY 8 Study Designs/QAPPs • Final Results Reporting / approval and Recommendations ) Phase I Phase III Concepts/Tools Study Designs S8.B. 1 & Parts ofS8.B.2, 3, & 4 S8.B.2 & 3 S8.B.4, 5, & 6 S8.B.7, 8, 9, &10 IP What can be done? What is important? How will the work What are the results How much will it cost? Who will do it? be completed? & recommendations? 1 Capacity Grant Up to $50,000 100% Reimbursable for eligible expenses Assists in implementation of permit requirements Suggest using to help City update Stormwater Program Plan discussion IN ♦` �{ snukan. vat Cid 6 6 S. 411"-- r ) :111yri otk 0 111111111 STORM O/7A/N ` O OA N CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: X Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information QX admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Council Goals and Priorities for Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Imposition of tax, set-up of LTAC and determination of qualified expenditures is governed by RCW 67.28, as amended by Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253 in 2013; and SVMC 3.20. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 14, 2015 Council approved Ordinance #15-008 that imposed an additional 1.3% Lodging Tax, the proceeds of which are to be used solely for capital expenditures for acquiring, constructing, making improvements to or other related capital expenditures for large sporting venues, or venues for tourism-related facilities that generate overnight guests at lodging facilities. No action on the 2015 process leading to 2016 awards has been taken thus far. BACKGROUND: The Tax Rate: In 2003, the City imposed an initial 2% lodging tax on all charges for furnishing lodging at hotels and motels pursuant to RCW 67.28.180. This tax is taken as a credit against the 6.5% state sales tax, so that the total tax a patron pays in retail sales tax and the hotel/motel tax combined is equal to the retail sales tax in the jurisdiction — which for Spokane Valley is 8.7%. We currently estimate the initial 2.0% lodging tax will generate approximately $510,000 in 2016. On April 14, 2014, the City imposed an additional 1.3% lodging tax pursuant to RCW 67.28.181. This tax is in addition to the existing 8.7% sales tax imposed in Spokane Valley, and when combined with a 2.0% lodging tax imposed by the Spokane Public Facilities District causes the total lodging tax rate in Spokane Valley to equal 12.0%. This additional lodging tax went into effect July 1, 2015. We currently estimate the 1.3% lodging tax will generate approximately $330,000 in 2016. 1 The combined sales and lodging tax rates are shown in the table below: Tax Components Retail I Hotel Sales tax State of Washington 6.50% 4.50% City of Spokane Valley 0.85% 0.85% Spokane County 0.15% 0.15% Criminal Justice 0.10% 0.10% Spokane PFD 0.10% 0.10% Public Safety 0.10% 0.10% Juvenile Jail 0.10% 0.10% Mental Health 0.10% 0.10% Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% 0.10% Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% 0.60% Total sales tax 8.70% 6.70% Lodging tax City of Spokane Valley (initial 2.0% tax) 0.00% 2.00% City of Spokane Valley (additional 1.3% tax) 0.00% 1.30% Spokane PFD 0.00% 2.00% Total lodging tax 0.00% 5.30% Total tax 8.70% 12.00% Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) The organizations to which the tax proceeds are distributed are ultimately determined by the City Council which receives a recommendation from the LTAC. The LTAC is comprised of five members who are appointed by the City Council, and by State law the Committee membership must include: • At least two representatives of businesses that are required to collect the tax, • At least two people who are involved in activities that are authorized to be funded by the tax, and • One elected city official who serves as chairperson of the LTAC. The LTAC makes its recommendations based upon a combination of written application materials and a presentation that is made to them by each applicant. State Rules Governing Use of the Initial 2% Lodging Tax In 2013 the Washington State Legislature approved Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253 which amended the lodging tax revenue, application process, selection process, and reporting requirements. ESHB 1253 specifically retained the City's authority to use lodging tax revenues to fund: • Tourism marketing. • The marketing and operations of special events and festivals. • The operations and capital expenditures of tourism-related facilities owned or operated by a municipality or public facility district. • The operations (but not capital expenditures) of tourism-related facilities owned or operated by non-profit organizations. 2 ESHB also established new application and reporting procedures for cities with a population greater than 5,000 that applicants must now submit their applications to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, estimating how money received will result in increases in the number of people traveling for business or pleasure on a trip in the following categories: • Away from their place of residence or business and staying overnight in paid accommodations; • To a place 50 miles or more one way from their place of residence or business for the day or staying overnight; or • From another country or state outside their place of residence or their business. Through 2012, the City Council could, at its option, supersede the recommendation of the LTAC and award lodging tax funds to applicants in the amount the Council collectively determined was appropriate based upon their own goals and priorities for promoting conventions, festivals, special events, and tourist travel. However, ESHB 1253 altered this authority and now Council's power has been limited to having the ability to either accept the recommendation of the LTAC and make the award to the given proposal, including the recommended amount, or reject the recommendation of the LTAC and decline to award specific proposals. Council may opt to accept some but not all of the recommendations for those proposals it feels are appropriate. However, Council cannot change the amount of any recommended award. In the event Council agrees with some but not all of the LTAC recommendations, some money may be "unallocated" and in that event Council would have to decide whether they would hold an additional application round or retain this money until the following year's award process. Council Goals and Priorities for Use of the Initial 2% Lodging Tax In August 2013 Council for the first time adopted goals and priorities that it encouraged the LTAC to consider when making award recommendations and in August 2014 updated these as follows: 1. Council desires to focus on all aspects of allowable lodging tax revenue uses by allocating portions of the available lodging tax revenues to each category specified in RCW 67.28.1816, as amended by Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1253: a. Tourism marketing b. The marketing and operations of special events and festivals c. The operation and capital expenditures of tourism related facilities owned or operated by a municipality or public facility district d. The operation (but not capital expenditures) of tourism related facilities owned or operated by non-profit organizations. 2. Council will consider the economic impact derived through the expenditure of lodging tax proceeds of all major components of our tourism-based economy including shopping, dining, and overnight visits. 3. Council will consider the utilization of funds for capital expenditures to develop tourism destination facilities or venues within the City of Spokane Valley (this option is limited to facilities owned by a municipality or public facility district). 4. Programs, projects or events should have the goal of becoming operationally self-sustaining in the future. 5. Council desires that 5% of total grant monies awarded be directed towards funding new projects, activities and/or events. 3 2015 Timeline Leading to 2016 Awards of the Initial 2.0% Lodging Tax The calendar we plan to follow in 2015 for 2016 lodging tax awards is as follows: _ Wed 9/2/2015 City runs notice in newspaper, places on web site, and sends letters to 2015 award recipients and others agencies that may have expressed _ interest. Fri 10/2/2015 Grant proposals are due to City by 4pm (no late submittals will be accepted). Fri 10/9/2015 Applications sent to Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for review. Wed. 10/14/2015 * 8:30 am Applicant presentations to Committee. Tues 10/27/2015 Formal Council Meeting Admin Report: LTAC Recommendations to City Council Tues 12/8/2015 Formal Council Meeting City Council Motion Consideration: Award Lodging Tax for 2016w I RCW 67.28.1817 requires that the City wait for a period of at least 45 days after the LTAC meeting before action can be taken by the City Council. 12/8/2015 Council Action 10/14/2015 LTAC meeting 55 days Additional 1.3% Lodging Tax The 1.3% additional lodging tax imposed by the City via Ordinance #15-008 went into effect July 1, 2015 and we anticipate we will receive our first remittance from the State near the end of August 2015 with total annual collections estimated to be approximately $330,000. Proceeds of this tax are to be used solely for capital expenditures for acquiring, constructing, making improvements to or other related capital expenditures for large sporting venues, or venues for tourism-related facilities that generate overnight guests at lodging facilities. The ultimate commitment of these funds will follow an application and award process similar to that employed with the initial 2.0% lodging tax where the LTAC will consider an application and make a recommendation to the City Council which will have the final say on whether an award is made. It will be quite some time before we accumulate enough money to begin such a project but we currently anticipate any project(s) considered will be jointly developed by the City and our local hoteliers and will take into account not just the cost of constructing a facility but also the cost of future operations. It is noteworthy that the proceeds of the additional 1.3% lodging tax may only be used for the construction of a facility and may not be used for operations. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: This is a discussion item only but staff is: 1. Seeking consensus from the Council on the goals and priorities the LTAC should consider when evaluating applications, and 2. Communicating to Council that the 2016 Budget is again being developed to set aside $30,000 of lodging tax revenues to enhance CenterPlace advertising expenses resulting in an increase in that marketing budget from $30,000 to $60,000. The Council is able to make this decision independent of any input from the LTAC because this represents a historical use by the City that preceded the Legislature's adoption of ESHB 1253. If the City desired the use of any additional lodging tax proceeds, it would be required to utilize the same application process noted above that is required of all other agencies seeking funding. 4 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: In 2016 the 2% portion of the lodging tax is currently anticipated to generate approximately $510,000 and the 1.3% portion an additional $330,000. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: • Lodging Tax Award History— 2003 through 2014 • 2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Reported by Municipalities (compiled by the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee (JLARC)) 5 H:\Budgets\2015\Lodging Tax\Lodging Tax Award History 03-15.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Lodging Tax Application/Award History For the years 2003 through 2015 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AGENCIES Application 1 Award Application I Award Application 1 Award Application I Award 07 Apply 07 Award Sprg 07 Apply Sprg 07 Awar Armed Forces&Aerospace Museum 3,327 0 2,531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burke Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147,500 0 CenterPlace-marketing 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 CenterPlace-marketing to regional meeting planners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Spokane Valley-Volleyball courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Spokane Valley-Directed Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chamber of Commerce 0 0 0 0 15,440 0 15,440 5,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Evergreen Regional Volleyball Court Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fair&Expo Marketing 58,376 17,500 35,000 25,000 21,000 18,000 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 Fairgrounds 0 0 21,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Friends of Centennial Trail 23,480 0 2,000 2,000 0 0 9,000 0 0 0 0 0 HUB Sports Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inland Dance Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,535 0 0 0 2,535 0 Inland NW Sr.Wellness Conference 12,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Latah Creek Wine Cellars 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Liberty Lake Rotary Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plantes Ferry Park 0 0 71,842 20,000 0 0 23,876 0 30,000 0 0 0 Six Bridges Arts Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 12,500 0 0 Splash-Down Family Waterpark 230,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spo Con 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Arts Commission 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane County Fair&Expo Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Horse Breeders of Inland NW 5,830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Polo Club 30,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Regional Sports Commission 120,000 52,200 150,000 100,000 100,000 75,000 100,000 84,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 Spokane River Forum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Symphony 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 40,000 1,000 0 0 22,100 10,000 49,104 5,000 27,450 10,000 0 0 Spokane Valley Soccer Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Winery Association 3,285 0 8,250 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 Sports USA Sports Complex 103,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SV Junior Soccer Association 96,642 24,800 71,842 0 0 0 4,000 4,000 0 0 17,000 30,300 U.S.Figure Skating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valleyfest 19,724 2,800 49,700 0 27,200 15,000 25,900 15,000 30,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 Valleyfest(additional for Spring 07(for float) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 0 Visit Spokane( ) 200,000 83,700 250,000 150,000 200,000 136,000 200,000 165,000 175,000 175,000 78,000 78,000 WebMaker 39,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YMCA 50,000 18,000 12,000 6,000 12,000 6,000 17,000 7,000 0 0 0 0 YMCA Skateboard Park 0 18,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,090,264 218,000 694,165 360,000 397,740 260,000 446,855 325,000 447,450 432,500 313,535 170,800 Page 1 of 3 H:\Budgets\2015\Lodging Tax\Lodging Tax Award History 03-15.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Lodging Tax Application/Award History For the years 2003 through 2015 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 AGENCIES Application I Award Application j Award Application I Award Application I Award Rnd 1 App f Rnd 1 Awrd Rnd 2 App I Rnd 2 Awrd Armed Forces&Aerospace Museum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burke Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CenterPlace-marketing 90,000 90,000 0 90,000 0 37,500 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 CenterPlace-marketing to regional meeting planners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Spokane Valley-Volleyball courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Spokane Valley-Directed Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chamber of Commerce 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evergreen Regional Volleyball Court Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fair&Expo Marketing 30,000 30,000 30,000 18,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fairgrounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Friends of Centennial Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HUB Sports Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 50,000 42,600 0 0 Inland Dance Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inland NW Sr.Wellness Conference 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Latah Creek Wine Cellars 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Liberty Lake Rotary Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,0000 0 Plantes Ferry Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Six Bridges Arts Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splash-Down Family Waterpark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 Spo Con 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,131 0 0 0 Spokane Arts Commission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 Spokane County Fair&Expo Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 25,900 Spokane Horse Breeders of Inland NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Polo Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Regieaal Sports Commission 175,000 145,000 190,000 115,000 150,000 120,000 165,000 165,000 200,000 185,000 0 0 Spokane River Forum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Symphony 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 0 0 30,260 3,250 11,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,900 5,000 1,100 Spokane Valley Soccer Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 Spokane Winery Association 8,300 8,300 9,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sports USA Sports Complex 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SV Junior Soccer Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U.S.Figure Skating 0 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valleyfest 40,000 30,000 50,000 27,500 50,000 30,000 50,000 36,000 50,000 0 50,000 30,000 Valleyfest(additional for Spring 07(for float) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Visit Spokane( ) 325,000 306,000 336,000 236,000 275,000 195,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 275,000 251,720 WebMaker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YMCA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YMCA Skateboard Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 823,300 624.300 645,260 505,000 486,600 387,500 510,000 496,000 375,131 261,500 440,000 308,720 Page 2 of 3 H:\Budgets\2015\Lodging Tax\Lodging Tax Award History 03-15.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA ( 3/12/2015 Lodging Tax Application/Award History For the years 2003 through 2015 2013 2014 2015 Total AGENCIES Application I Award Application I Award Application I Award Application fl Award Armed Forces&Aerospace Museum 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,858 0 Burke Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 147,500 0 CenterPlace-marketing 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 457,500 CenterPlace-marketing to regional meeting planners 0 0 0 0 30,000 17,000 30,000 17,000 City of Spokane Valley-Volleyball courts 0 0 0 0 120,000 68,000 120,000 68,000 City of Spokane Valley-Directed Marketing 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 (Chamber of Commerce 0 0 0 0 0 0 285,880 105,000 Evergreen Regional Volleyball Court Expansion 0 0 7,500 7,300 0 0 7,500 7,300 Fair&Expo Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 0 194,376 128,750 Fairgrounds 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,000 15,000 Friends of Centennial Trail 0 0 6,600 0 0 0 41,080 2,000 HUB Sports Center 50,000 21,100 40,000 36,000 40,000 40,000 220,000 179,700 Inland Dance Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,070 0 Inland NW Sr.Wellness Conference 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,500 0 Latah Creek Wine Cellars 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 Liberty Lake Rotary Club 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 Plantes Ferry Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,718 20,000 Six Bridges Arts Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 12,500 Splash-Down Family Waterpark 0 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 0 Spo Con 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,131 0 Spokane Arts Commission 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 0 Spokane County Fair&Expo Center 30,000 27,800 50,000 39,800 44,000 44,000 154,000 137,500 Spokane Horse Breeders of Inland NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,830 0 Spokane Polo Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,100 0 Spokane Regional Sports Commission 200,000 150,200 200,000 183,800 200,000 120,000 2,050,000 1,595,200 Spokane River Forum 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Spokane Symphony 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum 12,000 6,400 20,000 13,100 28,209 18,400 255,723 82,150 Spokane Valley Soccer Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 Spokane Winery Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,335 17,800 Sports USA Sports Complex 0 0 0 0 0 0 103,000 0 SV Junior Soccer Association 0 0 0 0 0 0 189,484 59,100 U.S.Figure Skating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Valleyfest 50,000 35,200 50,000 20,000 64,000 31,600 611,524 303,100 Valleyfest(additional for Spring 07(for float) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 0 Visit Spokane( ) 350,000 184,800 280,000 247,000 328,430 230,000 3,522,430 2,688,220 WebMaker 0 0 0 0 0 0 39,000 0 YMCA 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,000 37,000 YMCA Skateboard Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,000 Total 692,000 510,500 I 689,100 I 577,000 I 885,639 I 600,000 8,937,039 6,036,820 Page 3 of 3 Lodging Tax Expenditures Reported by Municipalities Page 1 of 1 2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Reported by Municipalities compiled by the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee (JLARC) lb REPORT 0 ABOUT details the report In 2013, ESHB 1253 tasked JLARC staff with ongoing data collection and reporting on municipalities' use of lodging tax revenues for tourism purposes. To learn more about the reporting process, please visit JLARC's Lodging Tax Data Collection pace. Municipalities included in this report were identified by the Washington Department of Revenue as recipients of lodging tax distributions during calendar year 2014. The information presented in this report was reported by Washington cities, towns, and counties for calendar year 2014. Although JLARC staff made considerable effort to provide guidance for consistency in how municipalities reported their use of lodging tax revenues, JLARC staff did not verify or analyze the information reported. Any specific questions about the information should be directed to the individual municipalities. 7/7/2015 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Taa Codg "# 1 Total Cost Projected Attendance -Estimated Actual Attendance ________1 funds funds of funded Overall Traveled 50 Stayed overnight Overall Traveled SO Stayed overnight j miles or more acs or mare ! Municipality Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid state/county lodging lodging i ._ state/county lodging lodging Sort> Aberdeen Adams County N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Airway Heights N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Anacortes $250,126 $226,522 $417,308 553,850 293,650 90,500 55,700 28,800 466,350 104,650 90,500 55,700 28,800 Arlington $89,615 $86,456 $191,811 69,370 28,450 11,182 646 2,058 61,730 28,420 11,142 546 1,213 Asotin City Asotin County $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 16,228 15,248 12,539 8,400 4,500 Auburn $67,568 $67,568 $134,068 19,000 2,850 1,190 1,800 1,725 22,142 3,956 1,221 2,134 2,038 Bainbridge Island $186,174 $127,633 $127,184 9,350 7,948 6,358 9,350 0 304,331 92,835 5,936 15,389 2,404 Battle Ground $25,200 $25,200 $16,392 8,000 2,500 1,300 1,300 0 6,086 10,300 1,268 1,268 0 Bellevue $10,171,521 166,056 34,995 13,652 24,288 5- ,977 170,574 35,947 14,023 24,949 6,140 Bellingham $1,032,390 $250,681 $227,573 63,737 16,798 71,471 17,866 264 Blaine $104,523 $86,300 $8,314,284 26,300 8,100 6,200 1,500 1- ,025 33,392 9,770 6,771 1,541 2,222 Bothell $196,353 $196,353 $187,532 883 1,128 Bremerton $442,750 $376,000 $3,807,403 93,892 15,560 20,110 10,690 160 142,149 39,209 30,228 21,037 11,221 Brewster Bridgeport N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Buckley $9,932 $9,932 $34,149 8,179 2,928 605 403 467 Burlington $214,210 $185,400 $596,630 368,532 436,997 235,902 400 33,929 1,845 Camas Cashmere $4,038 $4,038 $4,038 Castle Rock $14,225 $13,818 $13,818 2,300 750 675 950 25 6,100 2,450 1,650 2,051 450, Cathlamet Centralia $148,485 $127,985 $154,566 61,385 17,600 3,200 4,665 3,910 66,466 17,294 2,655 3,953 2,554 Chehalis $236,475 $181,475 $719,000 101,218 27,361 5,216 9,227 8- ,138 95,714 27,754 4,530 7,529 7,554 Chelan County $149,292 $94,375 $883,320 112,885 68,357 17,900 47,924 9,545 80,830 55,137 8,124 41,909 9,678 Cheney $36,603 $19,172 $184,070 14,525 1,730 860 225 4,700 11,883 2,040 971 243 2,630 Chewelah $20,092 $6,700 $86,057 100 30 100,787 80,200 17,082 467 1,405 City of Chelan $750,000 $750,000 $1,281,957 1,640,000 1,200,000 285,000 850,000 300,000 1,370,200 1,116,990 211,690 909,000 179,490 City of Okanogan $17,631 $17,000 $12,634 264,553 213,626 192,912 38,834 City of Orting N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Pacific City of Snohomish City of Spokane $177,500 $146,500 $1,719,740 181,000 60,000 61,190 212,597 98,149 370 68,939 6,440 City of Walla Walla $815,909 $788,409 $2,429,441 269,246 102,597 30,342 85,091 7,356 242,883 110,362 36,817 91,588 8,294 City of Yakima $1,430,791 $1,430,791 $1,430,791 229,500 149,050 1,693 77,000 6,080 225,472 105,517 1,693 75,056 6,203 Clallam County $385,469 $385,469 $385,469 780,000 702,000 351,000 185,000 95,000 889,954 801,132 399,975 211,192 108,769 Clark County Clarkston $85,985 $85,985 $198,000 20,900 20,460 15,320 10,050 5,020 17,075 15,592 12,738 8,430 4,506 Cle Elum $74,745 $61,642 $70,203 10,306 1,825 665 1,350 250 9,313 1,729 290 1,000 85 Colfax N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 1 of 6 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Taxes Lodging Tax Total Cost Projected Attendance L___ Estimated Actual Attendance Traveled 60 �1-` y f�"-'r funds funds of funded Overall miles or more Stayed overnight Overall tsE�e �L Stayed overnight I Municipality Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid I Attendees I Total From out of Paid Unpaid L state/county lodging lodging _ 1 state/county lodging lodging Sort> Columbia County Colville $105,930 $97,030 $73,841 36,150 10,508 10,870 6,203 0 18,344 3,383 1,288 4,337 1,187 Conconully $4,500 $4,500 $4,500 Connell $11,400 $10,896 $9,477 6,300 3,300 1,235 693 1,500 2,600 1,015 915 255 1,215 Coulee City $9,849 $9,849 $78,007 23,450 19,985 4,820 18,325 520 23,851 20,485 5,205 18,208 518 Coulee Dam $71,100 $58,774 $127,000 7,500 4,800 630 470 1,200 16,000 11,000 1,700 554 2,535 Coupeville $14,403 $14,403 $40,370 330 4,907 2,693 600 Cowlitz County $4,241,373 $341,373 $4,195,542 Davenport $2,911 $2,911 $5,900 Dayton Deer Park $18,000 $18,000 $135,921 14,775 120 40 0 0 13,809 124 60 0 0 Des Moines $20,135 $20,135 $1,524,154 Douglas County Du Pont $170,631 $170,631 $116,325 5,700 1,890 205 East Wenatchee $101,199 $101,199 $2,704,466 11,900 400 45 250 150 38,000 25,900 65 25,700 200 Eatonville Edmonds $63,145 $61,145 $62,510 215,967 65,285 1,519 3,148 132,361 74,526 24,827 4,812 384 Electric City $69,491 $43,400 $73,300 226,191 94,999 7,799 85,692 8,600 Ellensburg $425,521 $422,584 $539,885 13,110 2,749 25 967 676 13,367 2,761 195 1,030 815 Elma $79,933 $74,542 $162,971 11,600 2,550 5 180 200 12,300 3,015 12 250 256 Entiat $2,395 $2,395 $2,395 Enumclaw $9,500 $8,500 $14,125 600 400 88 Ephrata $75,601 $28,200 $211,801 10,000 41,000 16,150 1,000 1,032 160 Everett $439,923 $429,633 $1,158,436 223,700 110,010 590 3,155 2,888 179,168 65,334 2,367 4,062 3,466 Federal Way Ferndale Ferry County $27,750 $19,500 $8,700 Fife $365,680 $355,180 $557,116 184,328 2,260 250 30,784 50 286,265 92,134 15,685 30,275 10,300 Forks $130,572 $112,110 $180,020 51,255 43,849 26,819 17,666 4,643 40,996 35,707 20,799 13,684 3,903 Franklin County Friday Harbor $460,490 $376,684 $593,593 1,198,676 908,028 313,154 714.703 226,221 1,281,397 969,698 334,830 744,284 240,896 Garfield County Gig Harbor $295,850 $295,850 $234,391 Goldendale $28,140 $28,140 $179,130 10,223 1,823 1,823 75 200 14,525 3,788 2,223 3,714 2,035 Grand Coulee Grandview N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grant County $88,085 $82,000 $850,881 50,200 8,585 2,185 3,540 3,905 112,341 14,187 3,336 6,925 5,824 Grays Harbor County $95,350 $54,800 $1,371,737 56,313 12,031 72 3,971 1,133 Hoquiam $5,000 $5,000 $16,600 1,000 100 10 10 595 226 119 119 Ilwaco $29,000 $28,500 $487,965 109,500 68,375 44,415 30,126 22,950 100,332 64,397 37,242 22,013 20.595 lone $1,000 $1,000 3,200 2,900 500 200 Page 2 of 6 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Tax Lodging Tax 1 Total Cost Projected Attendance l Estimated AMdialinio -I i �;' funds funds of funded Overall Traveled 50 Stayed overnight Overall I Stayed overnight I miles or more Jatltrls,t nntit ___1I--_ Municipality ' Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid __ state/county lodging lodging _ state/county lodging lodging Sort> Island County $243,650 $186,000 $1,484,957 69,123 160,109 125,054 82,145 33,937 11,987 446 4,636 1,459 Issaquah $104,000 $101,076 $382,366 385,800 60,250 3,700 2,570 0 394,450 22,500 4,200 2,551 0 Jefferson County $302,737 $296,427 $397,808 835,152 688,864 10,566 645,284 7,215 1,185,380 832,038 18,636 434,649 2,502 Kalama $42,223 $39,897 $42,176 5,600 1,700 1,650 245 270 2,410 460 440 Kelso $180,975 $152,475 $628,482 181,920 71,940 37,880 6,490 3,200 169,813 64,546 34,863 6,311 3,058 Kennewick $974,850 $968,074 $5,818,862 710,878 358,480 117,220 191,310 350 734,149 256,384 104,067 215,180 443 Kent $80,126 $72,747 $210,087 8,300 290 8 163 0 8,132 291 8 93 0 Kettle Falls King County Kirkland $325,112 $263,187 $999,524 634,663 268,063 103,727 68,925 50,000 1,195,694 570,553 143,348 217,896 421,005 Kitsap County $394,942 $289,064 $1,023,739 0 72,542 9,664 3,969 2,595 1,373 Kittitas County $431,976 $317,535 $735,404 155,328 125,418 49,660 109,241 20,963 166,574 82,120 10,647 94,733 19,530 Klickitat County $45,500 $36,000 $36,000 6,726 6,726 1,995 2,222 232 La Conner $164,725 $121,517 $350,333 1,376,050 719,780 167,960 63,207 37,605 1,277,708 639,284 153,849 50,526 24,064 Lacey $484,000 $481,400 $2,707,085 233,500 65,570 13,305 10,816 12,794 496,185 90,189 18,660 26,460 13,491 Lakewood $531,390 $490,890 $467,532 121,258 18,500 1,843 4,947 1,265 191,345 84,411 12,039 22,024 2,067 Langley $53,544 $53,206 $16,862 26,000 117,250 40,000 35,000 Leavenworth $1,242,769 $1,185,222 $1,280,977 2,309,525 2,163,932 1,081,612 #4/444 980,362 4,558 2,462 974 1,386 2,346 Lewis County $411,000 $313,186 $564,270 63,840 28,940 9,900 13,520 5,720 180,036 133,216 34,279 60,020 125,251 Liberty Lake $73,000 $73,000 $122,423 418,766 90,217 34,063 71,400 108,200 376,820 90,217 34,063 71,400 108,200 Lincoln County $14,470 $10,889 $10,889 Long Beach $256,187 $218,187 $636,907 1,883,885 1,798,260 985,726 524,747 701,116 1,824,416 1,738,058 956,598 523,446 676,422 Longview $61,254 $53,054 $52,102 68,000 0 0 0 0 65,415 10,168 0 3,520 56 Lynden $58,500 $58,500 $50,513 92,200 18,400 12 500 8,902 121,858 24,296 10 600 11,484 Lynnwood $653,060 $653,060 $5,136,132 126,300 30,678 423,943 Marysville $133,171 $67,250 $167,840 153,800 20 400 542 228 158,350 2,128 0 538 202 Mason County $319,820 $265,371 $447,396 178,238 95,142 25,532 37,228 43,423 194,707 101,139 22,087 39,136 45,738 Metaline $100 $100 $100 Metaline Falls Monroe $92,000 $81,000 10,600 4,600 4,500 700 0 23,400 13,900 9,700 5,319 1,000 Montesano $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Morton Moses Lake $502,300 $497,500 $10,980,958 22,500 1,970 150 452 805 26,286 1,842 161 485 879 Mount Vernon $324,800 $280,048 $1,892,420 1,135,409 519,601 91,730 112,996 40,718 1,160,547 493,696 94,296 129,304 39,275 Mountlake Terrace $22,000 $21,100 $21,420 60,000 4,000 3,000 60 2,940 65,000 4,000 3,000 60 2,940 Mukilteo $339,793 $249,819 $697,283 216,700 154,600 18,400 3,477 14,440 178,322 69,225 28,441 5,017 7,843 Naches N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Newport $11,374 $10,546 $27,176 12,580 7,680 0 0 273 7,492 4,070 64 0 1,136 North Bend $8,600 $8,600 $8,600 1,000 473 158 0 0 630 473 158 4 0 North Bonneville $65,125 $65,125 $56,076 22,284 14,937 14,887 1,928 0 22,284 14,937 14,887 1,928 0 Northport N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 3 of 6 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Tax Tax 1 Total Cost Projected Attendance Estimated Actual Attendance Traveled 50 -Tralr miles or more - -" funds funds of funded Overall Stayed overnight Overall i 1T l_ Stayed overnight Municipality Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid ees Total From out of Paid Unpaid state/county lodging lodging , state/county lodging lodging Sort> Oak Harbor $87,090 $25,000 $401,146 29,400 11,285 1,891 1,110 580 42,075 14,891 5,611 4,090 945 Ocean Shores $867,236 $867,236 $867,236 87,669 20,506 10,253 Odessa N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Okanogan County $496,588 $431,805 $1,162,822 612,594 355,637 66,826 329,533 72,907 774,786 401,542 189,432 373,150 92,985 Olympia $511,812 $499,562 $539,793 480,200 88,626 22,369 13,739 12,099 566,957 195,373 42,851 32,092 41,016 Omak Oroville $22,317 $21,410 $18,480 274,550 238,825 55,900 204,750 76,618 274,892 220,964 58,076 195,823 40,265 Othello $72,960 $40,362 $381,562 147,360 10,962 5,097 5,430 5,361 143,577 10,241 1,926 4,216 4,880 Pacific County Pasco $484,280 $460,280 $2,503,189 3,000 500 350 280,429 9,203 7,790 231,169 656,490 Pateros $2,300 $2,300 $2,300 725 325 60 87 180 560 265 45 52 125 Pend Oreille County $37,280 $35,000 $90,030 37,200 17,011 120 164 3,478 Pierce County $1,151,215 $1,099,265 $3,591,346 1,087,451 416,906 266,361 853,658 500,034 1,850,023 1,064,841 403,573 976,171 609,847 Pomeroy $1,753 $1,753 $1,753 500 60 30 20 50 400 45 25 15 45 Port Angeles $742,775 $592,775 $530,221 423,389 387,685 153,287 250,986 26,418 442,323 405,337 160,440 269,177 28,414 Port Orchard $98,075 $59,595 $174,082 714,000 14,630 6,579 9,295 11,186 722,065 11,552 5,715 5,280 7,976 Port Townsend $362,162 $362,162 $384,444 276,326 101,703 9,000 275,947 101,703 9,000 Poulsbo $121,500 $112,000 $111,969 150,000 52,000 0 53,000 0 208,000 70,100 27,000 30,050 5,000 Prosser $103,000 $103,000 $103,000 33,500 14,500 8,000 22,400 9,000 34,500 14,500 8,000 22,850 9,000 Pullman $142,479 $86,910 $263,032 37,427 8,211 6,185 3,681 1,213 25,662 8,323 6,400 3,616 1,428 Puyallup $735,891 $654,007 $1,545,166 2,389,319 21,295 46,160 137,099 3,302 2,575,809 918,351 48,887 162,575 4,163 Quincy $33,900 $33,900 $69,922 4,800 8,887 795 10 150 365 Raymond $3,500 $3,333 $3,333 Redmond $519,175 $319,450 $9,827,105 243,600 17,085 3,673 3,493 9,547 194,742 14,276 4,174 3,089 8,165 Renton $260,292 $234,055 $296,858 177,400 27,700 7,689 7,983 3,706 141,197 8,438 2,484 4,391 18,293 Republic $26,600 $21,937 $21,937 11,080 7,705 975 1,570 4,980 11,080 7,705 975 1,570 4,980 Richland $761,824 $660,489 $2,015,266 267,211 168,756 100 130,339 115,248 262,336 165,385 910 129,266 107,713 Ridgefield Ritzville $63,452 $54,500 $54,500 5,556 6,406 4,340 1,264 Riverside N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roslyn San Juan County $513,027 $411,100 $3,076,519 112,050 16,311 75 26,197 1,839 110,979 42,549 12,680 31,062 5,648 SeaTac $1,987,025 $1,987,025 $2,473,917 700 576,152 253,000 116,000 2,067 15,700 Sedro Woolley $79,000 $37,000 $200,400 148,435 60,040 7,310 15,405 13,170 83,303 42,353 11,971 9,141 15,952 Selah Sequim $439,748 $428,342 $883,612 213,217 174,399 104,811 148,780 15,969 217,894 173,826 104,663 171,178 19,678 Shelton $39,150 $39,150 $105,000 29,229 4,367 1,213 495 971 23,799 5,105 1,109 516 972 Skagit County $425,314 $327,740 $2,161,741 2,181,805 1,127,445 336,991 543,371 141,869 1,917,248 1,110,142 324,051- 502,192 104,049 Skamania County $65,574 $65,574 $608,816 0 0 0 0 0 29,044 22,474 5,248 3,810 2,210 Snohomish County Snoqualmie $65,300 $65,300 $253,500 24,500 18,222 2,953 6,994 1,765 27,208 6,481 2,360 3,930 1,492 Page 4 of 6 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Tax Lodging Tax I Total Cost Projected Attendance Estimated Actual Attendance funds funds of funded Overall Traveled 50 Stayed overnight 1 Overall italllitt �� j miles or more y g I Stayed overnight - Municipality 1 Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid 1 Attendees I Total From out ofPaid Unpaid state/county lodging lodging L, i state/county lodging lodging Sort> Soap Lake South Bend $8,121 $8,121 $8,121 400 100 100 100 0 300 86 70 86 0 South Cle Elum N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Spokane County Spokane Valley $677,500 $577,000 $2,559,773 1,313,048 599,099 302,704 194,618 250,771 1,037,712 506,289 232,707 194,733 181,099 Centerplace $30,000 $30,000 $60,000 65,416 5,973 0 4,117 1,856 Evergreen Regional Volleyball $7,500 $7,300 $7,300 80 50 25 20 20 827 154 80 30 22 Association HUB $40,000 $36,000 $72,000 165,000 60,000 36,650 20,000 15,000 177,120 58,700 25,700 21,000 10,000 Spokane Co Fair and Expo $50,000 $39,800 $138,000 747,650 176,450 36,950 29,200 34,050 401,890 79,190 33,300 19,400 9,800 Center Spokane Sports Commission $200,000 $183,800 $1,213,000 50,875 50,575 23,075 39,400 675 39,994 39,994 19,973 35,384 2,310 Spokane Valley Heritage $20,000 $13,100 $21,000 4,700 1,700 950 200 500 3,849 1,530 391 159 175 Museum Valleyfest $50,000 $20,000 $38,000 36,174 5,414 1,398 350 1,064 30,000 5,854 2,114 2,032 407 Visit Spokane $280,000 $247,000 $1,010,473 308,569 304,910 203,656 105,448 199,462 318,616 314,894 151,149 112,611 156,529 Sprague $500 $500 $525 350 25 5 5 280 350 25 5 5 280 Stevens County $67,975 $44,826 $213,892 11,000 1,600 1,050 450 550 11,100 1,600 1,050 450 550 Stevenson $308,570 $295,150 $589,723 70,700 44,320 27,925 22,025 5,274 82,957 59,691 41,249 30,547 8,523 Sumas $2,000 $2,000 $7,425 10,000 10,000 Sumner $75,000 $75,000 $2,004,162 2,028,760 811,518 46,060 15,038 100 2,018,935 802,558 42,158 5,978 100 Sunnyside $113,140 $100,640 $167,390 35,000 500 0 250 500 110,170 80,990 550 2,260 3,072 Tacoma Thurston County N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Toledo Tonasket $12,500 $10,700 17,300 6,468 792 828 1,659 Toppenish $95,707 $62,850 $54,574 115,110 525 45 45 90 10,659 2,025 472 1,706 1,257 Tukwila $767,000 $767,000 $1,986,940 50,700 50,000 50,000 40,000 5,000 68,595 67,843 54,274 67,843 2,312 Tumwater $135,946 $97,854 $4,677,597 248,980 76,013 35,541 6,921 3,034 231,665 75,628 17,455 6,148 10,995 Twisp $21,982 $21,982 $21,982 Union Gap $174,337 $174,337 $122,488 3,500 700 200 52 2 3,506 686 182 172 0 Vancouver $869,425 $869,425 $869,425 174,153 95,000 69,661 85,521 2,141 175,597 95,000 70,239 88,731 1,443 Wahkiakum County Waitsburg $500 $500 1,000 500 10 50 1,000 500 10 50 - Walla Walla County $48,000 $35,000 $340,521 8,778 1,046 370 601 0 11,496 1,575 1,031 1,814 Washougal $48,100 $45,410 $64,289 1,600 725 0 180 0 785 281 218 60 Washtucna Wenatchee $981,277 $981,277 $981,277 88,443 28,291 9,992 16,459 1,500 851,446 32,364 8,556 19,829 200 West Richland Westport $218,173 $216,323 $268,112 85,214 65,505 10,523 45,353 5,732 79,805 64,096 10,333 43,387 6,376 Whatcom County $74,000 $74,000 $62,000 87,177 27,311 26,001 71 2 Whitman County N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 5 of 6 H:\City Departments\Finance\2015 Lodging Tax\2014 Lodging Tax Expenditures Report w CoSV to JLARC.xlsx Lodging Taxi L Tax 1 Total Cost Projected Attendance I Estimated Actual Attendance - 1 Traveled 50wee funds funds of funded Overall Stayed overnight Overall Stayed overnight , miles or more hithWelr Mak= Municipality Requested Awarded Activities Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid 1 Attendees Total From out of Paid Unpaid state/county lodging lodging I state/county lodging lodging Sort> Wilbur Winthrop $210,733 $166,790 $163,790 47,511 161,904 154,102 25,765 69,370 6,154 Woodinville $195,548 $147,048 $181,686 538,900 226,576 34,559 51,448 50,198 38,770 5,206 972 1,426 1,434 Woodland $32,500 $28,000 $156,885 43,514 29,749 14,207 1,326 0 38,514 26,749 14,207 1,326 0 Yakima County $17,506,278 $5,106,650 $5,080,346 Yelm Zillah $13,495 $13,495 $13,495 3,750 2,150 2,450 135 3,565 3,800 2,200 2,500 135 3,615 Page 6 of 6 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of July 9,2015; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings July 21,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,July 13] 1. Comp Plan Overview/Progress Report—John Hohman (90 minutes) 2.Admission Tax—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 3.Marijuana Legislative Update—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] July 28,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,July 20] Presentation: Special Recognition of Eagle Scout Austin Dill—Mike Stone (5 minutes) 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Mining Moratorium—Erik Lamb (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-0 14 Fatbeam Franchise—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: Stormwater Call for Projects—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Julie Oliver, Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Regional Wayfinding Concept Plan—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 85 minutes] August 4,2015—No Meeting(National Night Out) August 11,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution Amending Governance Manual—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) 3.Admin Report: 2016 Budget Estimated Revenues/expenditures—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] August 18,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 10] 1. LID(Local Improvement District)—Erik Lamb (20 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] August 25,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 17] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget Revenues,including Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes,motion to set Sept 22 Budget Hearing) (5 minutes) 3.Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Member—Mayor Grafos (5 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Spokane County Library District Update— Sheree West and Diane Brown (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] September 1,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 24] 1. Outside Agency Presentations (Economic Development, & Social Service; 5 minutes each) (-90 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 95 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 7/9/2015 2:29:38 PM Page 1 of 3 September 8,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 31] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: City Manager Presentation of 2016 Preliminary Budget—Mike Jackson (30 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) September 15,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 7] 1.Historic Preservation—Gloria Mantz (20 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) September 22,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 14] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Allocations—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: 2015 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Dept.Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] September 29,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 21 1.Advance Agenda October 6,2015,Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 28] 1.Advance Agenda October 13,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 5]] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2015 Budget Amendment— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance —Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance Amending 2015 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] October 20,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 12] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) October 27,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 19] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second reading Adopting 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Amending 2015 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Lodging Tax Advisory Cmte (LTAC)Recommended Allocations—Mark Calhoun(25 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Dept.Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] November 3, 2015,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 26] 1.Fee Resolution for 2016—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) November 10, 2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 2] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 7/9/2015 2:29:38 PM Page 2 of 3 November 17,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 9] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) November 24,2015—no meeting (Thanksgiving week) December 1,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 23] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) December 8,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 30] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2106—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: LTAC Allocations—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) December 15 2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 7] December 22,2015—no meeting December 29,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 21] January 5,2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 28] 1. Council Officer Elections for Mayor and Deputy Mayor—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appointments(either Dec 29 or Jan 12)— 3 Planning Commission Appointments(either Dec 29 of Jan 12) -2 LTAC(Lodging Tax) Appts: Various Committees(Dec 29 or Jan 12) Avista Electrical Franchise(2"d read Ord 15-011) Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Marijuana,Minor in Consumption Public Safety Quarterly Costs Sidewalks and Development SRTMC Interlocal Agreement(prior to end of year) Sullivan Park,nearby property for sale Used Oil Signage Ordinance Uncovered Loads Draft Advance Agenda 7/9/2015 2:29:38 PM Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: July 14, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing ® information [' admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Regional Wayfinding Concept Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The regional wayfinding and gateway signage project is a collaborative effort between Spokane County, the City of Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, City of Liberty Lake, West Plains Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Spokane Partnership, Visit Spokane, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to connect key attractions to visitors. The outcome of the plan is to establish and provide guidance on design criteria, graphic standards, and site locations for wayfinding signs throughout the region. The intent of this project is to standardize wayfinding throughout the region so that when visitors enter the area, the signage to local and regional attractions looks and feels the same making it easier for visitors to find their destination. Visit Spokane, the Downtown Spokane Partnership, and Spokane County have partnered to develop a wayfinding and gateway signage system within Spokane County to convey a consistent, memorable, and positive image to efficiently guide motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. In 2012 Spokane County, on behalf of the partnership, applied for and successfully received $242,027 in federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) to develop a comprehensive conceptual wayfinding plan for the region. The STP funds are for years 2013- 2016. The development of the plan has included policy and criteria discussion with each agency leading to established hierarchies of gateways, destinations, routes, and modes (bicycle, pedestrian, trails). Graphic standards and sign location guidelines were also established through coordination with agencies within the region, including the City of Spokane Valley. A tier system was developed for the region that ranked destinations based on several factors, including national and regional recognition, local versus regional visitation (amount of visitors from outside the Spokane region), number of yearly visitors, and number of hours per week open. The tier system begins with Tier 1, the most visible and highly prescriptive of the wayfinding tools and moves down to Tier 4 which would include destinations that can be accommodated by more general wayfinding tools such as pedestrian signs, orientation maps, websites, and brochures. A list of the destinations in the City of Spokane Valley within each Tier is provided below: City of Spokane Valley Destinations by Tier Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Avista Stadium City Hall Appleway Trail Arbor Crest Police / District Court Centennial Trailheads Knipprath Cellars CenterPlace • Barker Latah Creek Winery Library • Boulder Beach Mountain Dome Winery YMCA • East Mission Nodland Cellars Splash Down • Islands Spokane Valley Mall County Fair & Expo Center • John C. Shields Park Industrial Park • Mirabeau North Discovery Playground • Mirabeau South Dishman Hills Natural Area Mirabeau Park and Ride Mirabeau Point Park Pence Cole Transit Plante's Ferry Park Spokane River Auto Row Sullivan Retail District Felts Field Airport Museum SV Heritage Museum The Public Works Department, the Community and Economic Development Department, and the Parks and Recreational Department have provided input into the regional wayfinding plan for the City of Spokane Valley. The partnership has provided conceptual renderings of proposed wayfinding signs and conceptual placement of signs within each agency. The attached illustrates these renderings and sign placements within the City of Spokane Valley. At this stage in the plan, the regional partnership is seeking conceptual approval. The conceptual approval is for overall looks of the signs and conceptual placement of the various types of signs within the City of Spokane Valley. The project will include the development of implementation and maintenance costs for the plan, as well as a discussion of anticipated funding sources. It should be noted that funding for detailed design, implementation, and maintenance has not been secured. The partnership retained Merje Environments & Experiences to facilitate the design of the wayfinding plan. Merje will provide a presentation on the project to City Council on July 28, 2015. OPTIONS: Information Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Wayfinding Tier Determination, Spokane Valley Sign Location Plans DRAFT SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION TIER 1: Vehicular Signs/Primary TIER 4: Maps and/or Electronic STEP 2:DETERMINE WAYFINDING TIER To determine the destination's tier it must be ranked using the These are identified as major destinations and receive directional information to their This tier captures a variety of public entities or amenities that do not meet the attributes objective criteria outlined below. locations on vehicular signs from a large radius throughout downtown and its major outlined in Tier 1 through 3. routes.These destinations are typically nationally recognized or serve a primary visitor function(i.e.visitors center or convention center).These destinations also typically The Criteria Ranking System sets up a tiered system with specific attributes aimed have a designated parking facility or significant accessible parking nearby. at determining which Wayfinding tools are appropriate for a destination. The Criteria Ranking System begins with Tier 1,the most visible and highly prescriptive (Must meet 6 out of 7 criteria attributes listed below) TIER 1: Highway Signage•Vehicular Signage•Pedestrian Signage•Electronic+Maps of the Wayfinding tools(i.e.vehicular signage with specific type face and message Nationally Recognized Destination requirements)and moves down to destinations that can be accommodated by more f spmane valley :- Governmental, Governmental,Historical,or Culturally Institution r sherry�� e general wayfinding tools such as pedestrian signs,orientation maps,websites,and «west clams n ®" Greater than 50,000 visitors per year I1-L brochures. Open a minimum of 48 hours per week. _ Once a destination is determined to fall into a particular Tier,that destination is Open 12 months a year -! E i eligible for wayfinding prescribed in that Tier and all subsequent Tiers. For example, Includes a Visitor Information Center or Manned Kiosk � destinations eligible for Tier 2 wayfinding are also eligible for Tiers 3 and 4,but not Majority of Visitors not local to Spokane. y_,L oal n, ' aTy e Z. Tier 1. Please note that privately owned and maintained entities are not eligible for inclusion in the Tier system. Destinations with an associated Visitor's Center are TIER 2: Vehicular Signage•Pedestrian Signage•Electronic+Maps automatically included. TIER 2: Vehicular Signs/Secondary This tier of secondary destinations receive directional information to their destination on .w—. I vehicular signs from a smaller radius surrounding their locations.Typically this is limited to111 the decision points located closest to the point of interest.These are generally recognized '-I-= I l -,•--_ destinations that have access to public parking nearby. ',*,—a," °I ' - (Must meet 3 out of the 4 attributes listed below) D'=,=, Z°:=, o a, a o Regionally Recognized Destination TIER 3: Pedestrian signage•Electronic+Maps Greater than 10,000 visitors per year Open at least 40 urs per week WAYFINDING TOOLS Open at least 9 moonths out of the year --- i. m C = *Bridges accommodating motorized vehicles are automatically included in Tier 2. 11 j® � o m U' ,� H = n n A. z A O' ? ? ? TIER 3: Pedestrian Signs n� m m cc, e��.�,�o�� ,oa��, a�a�o��,o o Destinations included at this level receive directional information to the destination on I m rn IER 1 pedestrian signs.Information directing to their destination is generally placed within a E 5-10 min walking distance.Destinations limited to this tier are primarily access via non- SERVICE s ATTRACTION D ER 2 motorized vehicles or offer non-motorized activity(.e.trails,skate park,BMX park).These Ha�I-y� O destinations are generally local attractions or activities. + Z —I TIER 3 m (Must meet 2 out of the 2 attributes listed below) - xi "'Tier 4 Privately-Owned N ER Attractions are eligible far Locally Recognized Destination 4 DOT vehicular blue/white xxe colored signs(TODS Sign)located Primarily accessed via non-motorized vehicle ,„,L.=1s,,u a:,nao ism an State Highways. *Bridges accommodating only non-motorized vehicles are automatically included in Tier 3. 66 S1 HATLGILS SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON-Regional Wayfinding and Programming Analysis I Aug 8,2014 PHASING PLAN Multi-layered wayfinding programs are PHASE 1: PROGRAM LAUNCH often implemented over the course of several years.The determination M_EMME of what elements may be included in a given phase can be effected by the SPOKANE raaa.. 0following: — n.=e'e.°'°° •Availability of funding CSPOOKANE _ 1 SPOIUNEUNTY COUNTY - - - •Cost of individual components EV,',..,,ar.2el f MiliM •Complexity/Simplicity of approvals p •Complexity/Simplicity of Primary County Gateway Secondary County Gateway County Gateway WSDOT County Gateway Small county Gateway implementation large Enhancement Manner •Priority of need •Sequencing of information with other PHASE 2: SYSTEM FRAMEWORK elements PHASES IN mr O DOWNTOWN These identity SPOKANE "' °°^�`i n PARKING GARAGE elements a MI 1 roll-out the ural _ kation and n n� PROGRAM communication into the =STD.GATEWAY I 'V✓' �UNIVERSITYJ LAUNCH Spokane CountyIMA /1PA 7 7 Wayfinding ..vw'.p„r System. Primary City Gateway Secondary City Tertiary City District Gateway Primary District Gateway Secondary District Tertiary Parking Parking Arrival Parking Garage identification Gateway Gateway (Specialty Overpass) Gateway Gateway Trailblazer Idenllflcation These are in dM dual initiatives and core 2 components that can PHASE 3: CORE PROJECT SYSTEM be implemented,based FRAMEWORK on currently available funding,or future individual funding. TVisitoreenter ,, ERiveriront Park ® O 9 E IIC- ed... These elements require , 3 agreater amount nf - I-- o funding,and longer L CORE implementation periods; 4 PROJECT based on approval procedures or fabrication — - — — &installationlead times. Destination Directional Downtown Directional Destination Directional Information Kiosk Pedestrian Pedestrian Kiosk Interpretive Kiosk Bike Trail Trail Access River Access (Over 25 mph) (25 mph&Under) (25 mph&Under) Directional This category requires additional agency PHASE 4: ENHANCEMENTS coordination and can ad 4 independentlyfrom the core ENHANCEMENTS project.A schedule would be associated with future related construction a a projects or initiatives. 1111 C3 o T Maintenance&Updating 5 ! I! LONG Destination Arrival temporary Departure Service Trail Map Trail Access Trail Directional Trail ID Trail Mileage TERM Eventelgn Trailblazer Trailblazer PHASE 5: LONG TERM (Maintenance&Updating) 68 WAYFINDING TOOLS SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON-Regional Wayfinding and Programming Analysis I Aug 8,2014 Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System Spokane Valley, WA SIGN LOCATION PLANS Vehicular&Pedestrian Signage Ilu Submission#2 March 27, 2015 z $114111 ir mere CIL ENVIRONMENTS 8 EXPERIENCES 120 North Church Street 1/) Suite 208 West Chester,PA 19380 T 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Section 1-SIGNAGE STANDARDS A. Signage Standards Terminologies 1 Menu of Sign Types 2 Section 2-SIGN LOCATIONS Mole of Contents B. City Locations City Plan SL.1 City Segments SL.2 Section 3-MESSAGE SCHEDULE SECTION 1 I Signage Standards SPECIFICATIONS 4"VEHICULAR SIGN TERMINOLOGIES 6"VEHICULAR SIGN TERMINOLOGIES Sign Types:VDIR.1-3 Sign Types:VDIR.4-6 TIER 1 TIER 3 Avista Stadium Appleway Trail '"' "" e-i Centennial Trail: 'NO%'ERNIpIENT MCJCTDT CR TR'vCTIONS PvRK:RRECREION DISTRICTS y 1 I� GO%ERWIENT INI,SEI,F I 'CI,LTI,fiDL TIER 2 -Barker Trailhead i City Hall Avista Discovery Auto Row Felts Field City Hall -Boulder Beach Trailhead round F City Hall Police/District Court -East Mission P l a Stadium yg Centerplace -Islands Trailhead Police/ Sullivan Airport Museum Library -John C.Shields Park District Court Splash Down Dishman Hills Retail District YMCA -Mirabeau Trailhead North Natural Area Police/District SV Heritage Splash DownMirabeau Trailhead South County Fair&Expo Center Park&Ride County Fair Et Court Museum Industrial Park Pence Cole Transit co:R ILNITY Expo Center Mirabeau ML,sEL,MS L CL,LTL,DnL Discovery Playground Spokane River Centerplace Point Park Felts Field Dishman Hills p Industrial Natural Area TIEI14 Ar pt Museum oMML,NTv MnJOD nrTDncTIONs Mirabeau Point Park Arbor Crest Park Plante's Ferry Plante% Park/ Kni rathCellars Library Ferry pp Park/Stadium SV Heritage Stadium Latah Creek Winery YMCA Museum Centerplace Avista Stadium Auto Row Mountain Dome Winery Sullivan Retail District Nodland Cellars Felts Field Airport Museum Spokane Valley Mall*" SV Heritage Museum Library Splash Down VEHICULAR TRAILBLAZER SIGN TERMINOLOGIES County Fair wlNERIEs TR%SIT YMCA "TODS Signs Only Et Expo Center P oKA,L ,��F KnipprathCllar ® ® Business Et �} Cellars 10 I Latah Creek DISTRICTS Industrial Park NOTES: rZ�NEW"- Winery 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. Park Pence Auto Row 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the Mountain Remarks column. Cole P/TiK3'RECRE/1TI ON 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. Arbor Crest Dome Winery Ride Transit utile the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details oflocatton. Nodland C Discovery Cellars 4 4 S u l l l i v a n R e t a i l Playground ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES District120 North Church Street VDIR.9a-b VDIR.14 Dishman Hills nerJe Suite 208 west Chester,PA 19380 Natural Area T4/844288.°848 merjeaesign.com TfUULHE,'03 RI%Eli Mirabeau Point DATE CLIENT PROJECT 03/27/15 [�wy]` 1 ApplewayTrailBoulder John C. Park DRAWN BY LH SPOKANE,WA Beach Shields TbeSed,aw° , oESIRN Wzyfinaing and Swage System '"a `" IN>ENTONw a r°� csRb P P Park nn n1 °II � Plante's Ferry nm°m n N�nC " East sN PROJECT NO. r , snail bel 'I' 'nN atl d' Mission Mirabeau "' Park/Stadium PIfeSB Tn ff° °srn°°tln°d�°°y Barker d°�t,°mN°nIm°°s1°°s° °n111°°s SHEET TLE sn°wn°n Nis tlraeving.Sn°p tlraevings and Trailhead TrailheadTrailhead °eNlsm°srne50mm�enl°1°ISN°e�' Islands Northp,1 Hing wlN hnd tl° vehicular Terminologies es y Trailhead Mirabeau VDIR.8a VDIR.8c REVISIONS Spokane Valle 'Future Destination Trailhead SHEET NO. VDIR.16 VDIR.15 South 1 SPECIFICATIONS MENU OF SIGN TYPES Vehicular Signage Gonzaga Athletic Ctr Destination VA Medical T Name Center Washington Destination Spokane State Name Spokane Arena Eastern Arena Washington Destination Name LEFT AT LIGHT VDIR.1_LEFT VDIR.2_LEFT VDIR.3_LEFT VDIR.6a Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional (4"Message-25mph or less) (4"Message-25mph or less) (4"Message-25mph or less) (6"Message-25mph or more) MOM MOM MOM MOM Gonzaga Athletic Ctr VA Medical T ,r VA Medical Center Washington Center NOTES: g 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. State 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the Spokane Riverside State Spokane Falls Remarks the Mess Spokane Arena Eastern G.UtiLeteaoveLgendtohelpdetemineligntype,andotherde Park Comm Colle a ab ve Legendt help determine sign pea,and then details fl afi n. Arena Washington Whitworth 9 University F Bowl >f Pitcher Down River ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES Golf Ti 120 North Church Street n e rJ e Suite 208 West Chester PA 19380 T 484.266.0648 www.merjeclesign.com DATE 03/27/15 CLIENT/PROJECT DRAWN BY: LH SPOKANE,WA These drawing:are meant for DESIGN Wayfinding and Signage System INTENT ONLY and are not for construction. Contractor shall cerlfy and be responsible for all dimensions and Mons of the lab.Contractor shall be familiar with me site andconmtions PROJECT NO. I[presents.Ths office must be notified of any vars.,.from the dimensions and oenmtions SHEET TITLE shown on Nis drawing.Shop drawings and details must be submitted to this office for approval prior to proceeding wIN fabccabon. ■ , , - ■ ■ ■ Ell copy shall be proofread by client and legal Vehicular Signage • - - regsrements checked by legal department Overview VDIR.1 VDIR.2 VDIR.3 VDIR.4 VDIR.5 VDIR.6 Spokane Valley Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional Vehicular Directional REVISIONS (4"Message-25mph or less) (4"Message-25mph or less) (4"Message-25mph or less) (6"Message-25 mph or more) (6"Message-25 mph or more) (6"Message-25 mph or more) SHEET NO. MEM MEM MEM MOM MUM MUM 2 SPECIFICATIONS MENU OF SIGN TYPES Vehicular Signage ■ . III ■ I ■ Columbia 0,oln OPO K435 Q po35® PleauTrail 0 ..o. RIVS VE yNERy�111 NERy 1111." Park Bowl 8 Fish Lake fl Ride Pitcher NOTES: 'e T ra i l h e a d ,.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. Townshend T ra i l h e a d z me Message schednle provides more detailed gmdance or sign location in the Cellars Remrtothelumn. 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. 4.Ntilbe the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. ENVIRONMENTS & XPERIENCE S 20 North Church Street VDIR.Bc n e rJ e est PA 19380 Trailblazer :N/.4Chester, [`266.0648 merjetlesign.com NATE03/27/15T/PROJECT NRAWN BV: LH SPOKANE,WA mese drawing:are meant for DESIGN Wayfinding and Signage System MEEM IN,se dONLY and are enot for cDESIGN n. Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all dimension and analeons of the lab.Contractor a shall be familiar with me site anaconmtions PROJECT NO. V DI R.12It apss.This office must be noaaea or any VDIR.14 VDIR.15 VDIR.16 VDIR.Ma VDIR.Mb VDIR.9a VDIR.9b vrirenon ai from the menstoconk ons and conons SHEET/ITLE Trailblazer Trailblazer Trailblazer Trailblazer shown on thsarawing.Shoparawings and Trailblazer Trailblazer Trailblazer Trailblazer aetaa:must be submitted to this orate for 111032. MIMI approval Prior to Proceeding with fabccabon. ® ® ® ® ra copyshad be proofread bycaentana legal Vehicular Signage regsrements checked by legal department Overview Spokane Valley REVISIONS SHEET NO. 3 SPECIFICATIONS MENU OF SIGN TYPES Pedestrian Signage Trail Signage f: TRAIL.2c TRAIL.2d Trail Directional Trail Directional _II_ NOTES: 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the -ERemarks column. i� ..E..e..,v�. YE..E...^.®,�.,. -1-4-1-11-2 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. ""• ' ""• ' 4.NtilLe the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. T 0 ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES .11 * 120 North Church Street la 4` '� Suite 208 ¢.1' e r�e West Chester,PA 19380 1 2 T 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com � .merjetlesign.com 2 I.-:. I ♦ �'--"` GATE 03/27/15 CLIENT/PROJECT Anme.. ftII DRAWN ST LH SPOKANE,WA These aravu ng:are mmntfor oESlcN Wayfinding and Signage System INIENT ONtvana are not for mnmumon. #. comracmr sbau.erlfy ana be responslae mr all almenslons and mnaldons of the lob.Contractor shall be familiar with me site and conations PROJECT NO. .r - - Itpresents.Th.office must be nodfiea of any varsdons from the amensions and conations SHEET-RILE KIOSK.1 KIOSK.2 TRAIL.1 TRAIL.2a TRAIL.2b TRAIL.3 TRAIL.4 shown on this arapamgshop arapamgs and Pedestrian Kiosk Pedestrian Kiosk Trailhead Marker Trail Directional Trail Directional Mile Marker Trail Kiosk aeraas must be subminea to this office for approval prior m proceeding palm er sea don. All shall Pedestrian& il EgIMM ME= regsrra entscha checked byalegal department Signage Overview MEM MEM Spokane Valley WHIM MIIIM REVISIONS ® ® SHEET NO. 4 SECTION 2 I Sign Locations SPECIFICATIONS Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- outs and installation methods. Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, quantities,and specific location details. • See sheet SV.SL.2 See sheet SV-SL.4 See sheet SV-SL.6 See sheet SV-SL.8 for location details fur-location details a .,,a.a•,.: for location details for location details „m_,-. SIGNAGE LEGEND ., ..-. ,,...A.. ..,-�.,, ED Gateways n Vehicular Directionals .•,./ i ED Vehicular Directionals - ., t. _- Vehicular Directionals 400 Vehicular Directionals • E = pew .6 CD Parking Pk .__ -- �- -- '� L-0 P 600 Pedestrian --- -`- j • . ED Trail Signage ' � •- — -j ,-,:__, - 800 Miscellaneous -0 .6G -0 4 8 _ •• r NOTES: G Q P Q 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the Remarks column. See sheet SV-SL.3 See sheet SV-SL.5 See sheet SV.SL.7 See sheet SV.SL.9 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. 4.Ntil¢e the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of location. for location details for location details for location details for location details ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES 120 North Church Street nerJe Suite 208 -- - West Chester,PA 19380 4 _ r 21 T 484.266.0648 www.merjeclesign.com - .merjetlesign.com . - I -•• -_ r - -- -- --• DATE 03/27/15 CLIENT/PROJECT -- - - — _- I- _., DRAWN BY: LH SPOKANE,WA Wayfinding and Signage System I These drawings are meant for DESIGN .�_ — '--- INTENT GNI,.are not for construction. Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all I dimensions and condiecns of the lab.Contractor shall be familiar with the site and conmtions PROJECT NO. I[presents.Ths office must be notified of any vars.,.from the dimensions and oenmtions SHEET TITLE —I I shown on Nis drawing.Shop drawings and details must be submitted to this office for approval prior to proceeding with fabccabon. Ell copy shall be proofread by client and legal Spokane Valley requirements checked by legal department Sign Location Plans REVISIONS SHEET NO. SV-SL.1 T a. SPECIFICATIONS F Olympic Ave, = Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System c E`'� design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- z' 47iC Wabash Ave outs and installation methods. ESrcao Avh. _ m a 3 et g p Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System zvy $ $ „',:—Ti. m civ,,M"`'K message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, WIVI.�,ill c 00' quantities,and specific location details. E Wellesley Avc pe. %y}r 6eaCari Nig Events{5 E pijngeton Ave E Longfellow Are z +Q E Rich'Ave Camp Sekaai Park c 10,etcS each Boulc�ei'bTrail y SIGNAGE LEGEND -_oPs\.v[:Pt P 8-.� r r i Gateways co A:rc ED r Vehicular Directionals ED ED * r Vehicular Directionals ' v,,e.` Vehicular Directionals ti�� ^In r r 400 Vehicular Directionals E Llorteb Er)Parking 600 Pedestrian E ua�ne,A ED Trail Signage st Esmeralda Golf course John C.Shields Park 800 Miscellaneous ' (Centennial Trail) _ _ al r ... q,.:ti::r r4vc • . sty u4 John a Shields Park NOTES: '7' [T Mrrinehafla Path YVer D' 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. ® ua - 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the E11erterr[aty g �� Refer to thelMes K E Euclid Ave 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. Upriver Dam• s}1o*8n Fckivel — — -LudJ-A 4.utile the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. E FrederickAve '1 --0 '-` t - ., E F3irYieW AYe llMEDENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES E Pali viewAve E Moreland Ave g- _ E rmivi"t•,.Ave Pyv_� IMI I 120 North Church Street EGarx Avg = - cter I I e rV e Suitt 208 E Grace Ave n Spoka rte I'okcr Academy I`elSs Field RVI9 tion • � West Chester,PA 19380 7 ;, E Buckeye Aye • Felts Field Airport Museum Taraa.zss.osaa z F 8uclreye.vu z er P'''' .merjetlesign.com a i Spokane Sells Field "�' cy. Etaarretranve EfrtarlenaA DATE 03/27/15 cuENTj PROJECT 9. ¢ z DRAWN BY: ut rye ae LH SPOKANE,WA - EJ'eer:spa lye l' ;j quer” S.u�"t ` Wayfnd ng and Signage System l a C These tl 'g f DESIGN So K'r !y Z INTENT ONLY and for.nstruction ECaehsle Ave beau Rivage Apartments a- Lc-artiste Ave comrac M1 u h a b p 'N f u Elfin/Townhornes'•. �Q� BQ a 2 - dimensionsa a f M1 b.Contractor ��S�Q' . shall bet I' with the stead aeons PROJECT NO. EhA©h{C Uni2ry Aver �{be e_\ it press Thisofficemust be notified of any 1vP 5 "r ��Zry .] _ varaeom from the dimensions and wnditions SHEET TITLE E Drains Ave > �e d r-f r+pv., _ _ a shown b'drawing Shop dg a r- 4ie' Z L] details b submitted this off' for • approval prior to proceeding with f b't r'FrQr f Upriver C� z E Kilo,A,e _ c a e Au copy shall be preeo-.a by r aengal Spokane Valley _ Kr jpprath Cellars•`a _ l q Semen checaea by legala p Sign Location Plans 3Aya �S 'eh .Rlver'- ,N}n 0� r (St Pye REVISIONS tvet�-e SVP �� Mutual Matenals;m ""�jre SHEET NO. Spokane r_rpss.. f� . . -E pant AveE.Trent Ave Es,,it Valley P. c Scent E'�e R.It,�1:„ SV-SL.2 SPECIFICATIONS COP' ,,. U E aaldN Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- 'Nora Awe - outs and installation methods. EMora RYE s' ��Se�t.Rvj4 Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System Ay Cotllege Seth Woodard, v message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, r� quantities,and specific location details. E M39Sian Ave 4 ,rµF Bementary School.- �h c E Mission Ave E Mission Ave s C� P' oo y 1, "�' Hake Cascade Bldg II 1 Materiels Distribution.m AO X t.lk C 2 2 E'' S m7. I rz E Penns,....VF Beton Matti la - F Shore Ave Spokane Terminal. ' 2 t E stlarp Ave Z Z �sorte 3 a m -E+lAvc _Et 3 Eaaene AYe. Z G w rt1 srtsel A•yP. a EReamet Ara - ra w - c n UPS Customer Ce ;yc.' y Se CCatalan Ave T '$ SIGNAGE LEGEND Q t Mallon Ave a - Gateways EB1alIo❑Ave ^ Vehicular Directionals E Broadway Ave E 6loadway Ave E Broadway Ave E Dtuadway�Le 41) e E Broadway Av Vehicular Directionals Dr. 41, &roadway,Ave_$; E Broadwal Ay Vehicular Directionals re �a�` 5 •County Fair&Expo Center E0 LAI41Ave z z Flieaeo+xds 400 Vehicular Directionals EA:klgve ;� ;, Z n Parking ,r •Avista Stadium „ r= � a E(4l.ve Ave E ANI Ave w a i - -' 600 Pedestrian z Spokane Indians. 0, E a Trail Signage y = _ EFerry'Ave. I a ay FVAIlevwAve a '2 800 Miscellaneous S t: S r _.9D E Munn Ave efi 2: m E MDi.n IVvc E MOIR Me F. E Main"...rF. Costco Spokane'a: A NOTES: E sc, 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. ,�11 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the •1 Remarks column. 'V. F.Sprague AveE$Sprague Ave3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. g P E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave 4.Ntif e the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. Prenerd Blue CrassIli H i91 rive v E rat Ave. i E tet Ave. a.y •+. L 1st Are Dishman Dodge 9 _ ;Lpvre'g 3 2E9 Q-Cottage Cafe.11. city Hem Chtysier Jeep' ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES Escifie Av. a E 2nd Aves C lad Nee g '84 Q 92 in 'K 4 c N. J ''Wm]Ave? _ 120 North Church Street E 2nd Ave a E 3rd Aver �. .SYa�� 9❑ g .. ' Suite 208 tP3K. _ - E 3rd Ave )e r�e West Chester,PA 19380 '- Y— 9a 90 '43fi �. b T 484.266.0648 - E dth Ave E ath Ave m www.merieaesign.00m v A E.,It'l rive E 5-:Ave _c 5[h A. v, v S R, DATE CLIENT/PROJECT _ x n E6tlrave - 03/27/15 E 6191 Ave ri.. E Gm Ave :'. = e m .,61 '�' DRAWN BY: LH SPOKANE,WA Fi EGth Ave Wa f din o Si System N a - y m g an Signage ys em E 61h Ave- E 4119.five. e. 'ti These araw rigs are meant for DESIGN OeIJP E71h ALP c F6thl INTENT ONLY and are not for wnatruction. 5 Contractor shall verify aria be responsible for all E Hartsor Ave v, ° 2 ET dlmenwions andwmmhons of the lob.contractor E Sin Ave E Sth.Ave E Lith Ave _ shall befammarw¢h toe s¢canaconainons PROJECTED. I[presents.Ths office must be notified of any E 7sh A. • varato f h d cions d moons SHEET TITLE E gtll Rye - hown htl g.Shop tl g tl K Spokane Reck Product's,•-'. ESclr Al,AYr Esth Ave [RrnArs y.. n ae�Is b b' a haff' to Et3tr.Ave M J '� a .. E, ¢ approval par to proceedng vehf b 'n. rii U. L3 m on All spy shall be proofread by I tllgal F E IDEM1 AVE t Spokane Valley . E 4th P" ' _ a R a requ rements checked by legal deparcment. Sign Location Plans F ,Pie Lt Ave V. ETirlt Awe c y' REVISIONS Fil HE 12th Ave n E inn AVP SHEETED. E l lin Ave a E 11th Ave- y E.13t1e.Ave c;rf SV-SL.3 SPECIFICATIONS g Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System as, design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- t. z� a call- outs and installation methods. n z ci N� X 7 Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System C Prii ceina Aye message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, c 2 Pasadena fudge,k* - = quantities,and specific location details. Oarrrer,L Apartmenla;` - Arbor Crest Wine E WNlecIey Ave e Y 0 Arbor Cresi t A -5., z E - m o- 9t SC Z s o- v LAO tiy ,or rn E Upriver Dr E Upriver Dr etgq E Upriver Dr E UpFIV r Erniil i{;per 1 up 2 2 Argonne Library 4 z head zyt O ' Eyy ircirsnfkAwelld OLRrhe Ar n0'. SIGNAGE LEGEND "b 4.4. z ��Islands r F Lucrvsze.Ave * F. z, e, E. ELacressc Ave �`-. (Centel ED Gateways A.,,-...1 F r r Vehicular Directionals •;'1`i a E i;eria,1Q Ave rrJt3 - '® - ED Vehicular Directionals - S ryago pr • d:, yED Vehicular Directionals I eS 400 Vehicular Directionals H.temsnAve - ane.�,iv Cill Parking E Maringe 1)r Uy` £.s Rrorrwsr a ye _ •East Maringo Drive.-„ SO 600 Pedestrian '' Illw (Centennial Trail) ED Trail Signage E Glass Pre z z fC.nUnraml Ave. a'poka+le River c.co4o>_e.ttu�k� z GEngr.�^"e 800 Miscellaneous n z z z z ,s a .V 74 x• E 5T1I:Nennrr,r.,=z Inland Enure Eq r; a ? Paper Company , 4E Lr-betty Are g° ,3 l� 4e. e NOTES: - r_ 2 _ ,Atotivps"' teca"t 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets -EEQaetnn AVC'3. t n E� Epa+1/0864p 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the so arks column. Mill�.p,/OOd Farmers Market 0 :at z90 RemrtotheMess .' Millwood WOOd Pa Yk 4 3.Refer to the Message Schedule forthe final messages of each sign. E Euclid Ave L�'ye R'1e 4.Ntil¢e the above Legend to help determine sign types and other details of locafion. E ftrclid'AY., l yr T4C0 F 4,31N E FrFtlerlG%P - Mal I God F, Mlllwopr� ity Haff -_ ' a E Frederick Ave ,4;eY}1RgC EFair�irwA ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES 0'0"N� a 2 ti F Tattoo..Ass ,= • E.Fairview Ave a rJ Z F 120 North Church Street - e Gf_cc Aev c a 6 C � E I 1 e rV e Suite 208 Z E Grace run, 3 i+ant A' C Grace'Aue 2 - �� * •rSlwkane.Wkrery Tours West Chester,PA 19380 2m E a Et 7484266.0648 E,BuckeyP:Rva z - 11Ruckeye Ave G �geni�,VE LLitckeye Ave - www.merjedesign.com S Alberts�ans or. m. FD3 11 - AA 1 I W'O U d DATE 03/27/15 CLIENT/PROJECT g L DRAWN BY: c C Jackem>•nve s E Jackson Ava LH �Ol E.Mantg9mery Dr SPOKANE,WA C z Wayfinding and Signage System re t�ye . rg m z These arawmgsare m�n[mr DESIGN INTENT ONLY and are not for wnsnuctlon. F�.;,r!islc:Ave Eft S contractor shall yen.a.be retponsble for all CD. b LL C amens d d' of the f b.Contractor Ot(a r7 Montgomery Ave p E Meantgomery Ave '� shall 'b m d d' �8 c 2 '[prase bef Tb f b fi Za y PROJECT NO. jie- z yaraeo f h d d d' s SHEET TITLE ,z Ir shown on thsdraysng.Shop dravengs a. a EMenahald Ave S n '� g M deli is b a b h oar to approval p p ceedng vsh f b t 1%We ',2:, C All wpyshallb proofread by I tllegal 0.110%Ave CKnnxUC -AEKltulr Ave Nodland Cellars LLC•NocdCe regurecheck.by legal ap enc Spokane Valley $ - a OEM Sign Location Plans z z Spalding Auto Parts 4+. 2 T. C a F Shannon Ave REVISIONS z K a m Ill w;Super 8 Spokane Valley .. _ i mor SHEET NO. n E. °'tandi6na Nte m E. za in.Ave - SV-SL.4 Iow+n.uve — SPECIFICATIONS L kora Are E+vnia vJe Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System — E Nara Ave :Nara Aye Splash Down design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material cali- f Nora Imo = z outs and Installation methods. z c •Splash Down E Augusta Ave Enuqus!it nvr Refer to the Spokane County Wayfmdmg and Signage System c message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, E Mission Ave E Mission Ave E Mission Ave E Mission Ave r Mission Ave E Mission Ave E Miss quantities,and specific location details. v zK E Maxviell.Ave F Maxwel;Ave. JILtory La 18iai E slam Ave. ESlnra AveaugFsinla Ave E Sin to Rrc Z z n F.So rto Ave 2 C o VV E q a z - z e z z CSham Ave - F Snar�.gw. u EEBanne Ave VL Ave: EBoaAe AVE - Lboone Aye _ wx -. L Defnlci Ave ' E Ca:aiSn Ave E Catalrlu Ave £ I CaCal[Iv Ave E Cakaldu Ave *: ,:in: z a w - SIGNAGE LEGEND a C Deur Aa: S 2 Ness Elementary School ; E Mallon Ave s ED Gateways C E Ave E Broadway Ave E Broadway Ave E Broadway AVe E Broadway Ave E Broadway Ave E BrPadway Ave' "1r r E.Broadw Vehicular Directionals ga t. ? r r Vehicular Directionals tSpringfield Ave a Er)Vehicular Directionals P E Alk)Ave EARD Ave EAlkt Ave EArki Ave E.Alin Ave 400 Vehicular Directionals .211 a r r Parking 22 zo a s m _ F a. m W 600 Pedestrian a � g a a z E v.,16 ;ay Ave " 'Valicywxy Ave _ heyvrev.Ace E Vaaeywup Ave ED Trail Signage F,Valleyway Ave a. -eyw 'a E 800 Miscellaneous a E a - ENLw11 Are: E Harrlrgr - 2 �ArP E Ldxl Biba e c E ma Are- Dishma♦1 Llta/n Ave EMain'Ave ,V--'' t'Hanrngroft 3aR si NOTES: -39° {�`H Pat 1.General sign 2 The Schede are ovides morided e these pd guidance eachsign. `©if S L _ g etlule p tl ore aero led a dance of s gn local on n the CSL P!&sraa �� HvHat Mongolian G 'YV Remarks column E Sprague AVe _ E S r4. iue Ave E S a Ile Ave.acP, 5 r4. ue Ave X71 s R r t e M s h tl l r ter Shades or h E Sprague Ave E Sprague Avep 9 taco r®!� ri' 9 I. a uelve me above Legend t help determine sign types and Omer details or locanon. N ria W�-. E ISi AYe 131st Ave' a 'E./1! F lslhv. ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES g4. c £ APRiC'W❑y t31vd 120 North Church Street -P1'way Blvd City HFIMI I Suite 208 F 3rd Ave I I e rV e West Chester,PA 19380 Roller Valley lb Pence Cole Transit T 484.266.0648 Skate Center E 4th Ave E 4Th Ave www.merjedesign.com en L•"Ih Ave n { m GATE CLIENT/PROJECT N m L 51h EI rn 8 03/27/15 Park Peace O co n �5, �s i. _ 6 x DRAWN BY: a ] 'm" E6th Ave a LH SPOKANE,WA y L 6111 Ave r › e 'baa AM Fit �' These drawings are meant for DESIGN Wayfntling and Signage System 'Pi Ln F 7Th Aye L rah Ave: n INTENT ONLYana are not for constructiont. . and be onible for all :VOL'. dimensions ane conContractor shall ditions of the jobsContractor °^ Et$th Ave E 8th Ave E 8th Ave" shall be familiar with the site ane conditions PROJECT NO. I[presents.This office must be notified of any E Archery Arem variations from the dimensions and wnditiens SHEET TITLE asuman}fillyL 4th Ave shown on this drawingshop drawings ane ,.Nalrlydl Area 'rtAYf details must be submitted to this office for IN y approval prior to preceeding with fabrlmtion. a,. L9rAAve sbe by Ell wementpy s checked agal department legal Spokane""'''"'.' ^'^4.:h-s^�ens:�• E1Cih Ave F100 Ave requirements checaea by legal aeparcment P Y 0 Dishman Hills Natural Area E1a:o,.1.E' A n Sign Location Plans fip![jha„k a - .T: .2 E 1 rNrgve filth Ave tit ./ REVISIONS Q Spring w `g _ a ❑. W n n � 3T E17 hAVE a SHEET NO. r1 o c a a r 1JDI q L - �f` � ve u, SV-SL.5 SPECIFICATIONS F.01.p:n4'c 4OVamic Av4: m. x Refer to the Spokane County Wayfinding and Signage System 1'4 -_ X -o design intent documentation for sign type drawings,materialcall- c E. z 3 = outs and installation methods. F z a irentwUod - East Valley>iigh'School`_�, Refer to the Spokane County Wayfandmg and Signage System Elementary School m message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, rp c quantities,and specific location details. Wine cellarsE Wellesley Ave L Wellesley Ave ro E Wellesley Ave E Wellesley Avc E Wale?ley Ave E Welk slI :rest Center church:`r. g z z 'E Iie.rny Ayr- E 14eroa Are 3. F Hevoy Ave 5" ,rQl VT e `p.• Qin z 4- -.r. 14,E r•''Plantes Ferry Soccer z7 a 1. Et Pfantes Ferry Park M1H.-;r•n:,.nr n Soorls Complex f, _ F Rich Are K. L 001 Avv- L Dish Are 0 Plantes Ferry park = T &Sports Comglex a E Rtickwallhv4 Trent Ave" a E Trent Av5 Inds Trailhead Trent Trent Ave. SIGNAGE LEGEND tntenr ial Trail) • i� E 1'rent.AYe- x�o ® v .� i rr Gateways r r Vehicular Directionals - u,� `��e. r ED Vehicular Directionals %: ccs'' r r Vehicular Directionals ® Sp s 400 Vehicular Directionals �',lernan A•:p i&lama,Ar r A. Parking ya (ZJI 2 w Z .:600 Pedestrian T np;t;r I. c® r r Trail Signage a" CYt4,4. D800 Miscellaneous i Q ®� - y� Mountain oven.'P 'p wry ar ,. NOTES: 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. 2ud/5:g. Zr, _ 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the ® Lohe.Canary Winery Remarks column. r EC; 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. Mf.nheall Pkt•:+/ 'F F,ucfid Ave 2 4.CtilLe the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. strict Ave M C z a a,Mrrnbgtl ''A'v ? ENVIRONMENTSI & EXPERIENCES ewayr Mirabeau Point Park t0Mirabeau Trailhead(North)(Centennial Trail) z v u 120 North Church Street E Grace Ave J wEFal wicw I.n Suite 208 e rIJ e West Chester,PA 19380 Pi_ Eituckept Ave '' .-•L.-I 1FfG r� T484.zss.0648 www.merjeclesign.com Ott ` '`®Mirabeau Trailhead(South) r = 03/27/15 E'Marmara Ave ®. • 4 DATE CLIENT/PROJECT (Centennial Trail) B.' DRAWN BY: LH SPOKANE,WA YMCA. r Wayfinding and Signage System YMCA of the 0Centerplace r3 These drawings are mean[for DESIGN Z Inland NorthwestINTENT WY and are not for construction. Contractor shall verify arra be responsible for all — dimes tl tl f h job Contractor 6 — shall be 'I' the d d' m i - PROJECT NO. n x kane Fini 9 C _ [prate This officebnotifiedof y A. 2 o f h d d d' SHEET TITLE �^,. hthis drawing.Shop drawings tl EMansfieldAve Discovery Playground� s� detaapproval prior b proceto edingis a `° E Mansfielr5 Rue. 1 Al rnd Cellars LLO C _ requirements e py shall b proofread gy r d legal Spokane Valley requ re en6 checked by legal department TT Sign Location Plans • ZED The Black Pearl, REVISIONS Restaurant Park&Ride 0 el9 el0 Indiana Ave F/ SHEET NO. :Montgomery Dr �r E Indi '•' h rUr''ry Latah Creek 0 Lala,, _r ® I ta,; ;h_ '''' �• k z SV-SL.6 . . Winery .._ c...L6-.,V..1m..rsird. an . _ — _ '''1% _ SPECIFICATIONS s' _ _so- Spokane Valley Mall* -c so' ?w Refer to the Spokane County Wayfmdmg and Signage System design Intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- Valley all- Spokane a 1a outs and installation methods. Va i I ey gr Sullivan Trailhead ® w oT 712._ Refer to the Spokane County Wayfmdmg and Signage System ,' (No Parking) .�, '' j message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, ISSIOR'Ave E Missl -nn Ave i hldia,W1/. ��. quantities,and specific location details. t7® a FAgission AvE, -vas 8/0"'" `I ''r_" Maxwell Ave i?. • — P `I s Valley a1fl Ave E Santo AMG Hospital E 5irto.Ave E Sm10 Ave. so. 4'79 a ESrarp AY„ $ ESh;:rn Ave ESharU pyo, Mysgiot Ave d•' m n E&none Ave z - E Rc>l?a Ave c E Scone A•re z.- m t 9oone Ave z E❑eerrer Ave f:tleaniet'Olt ¢ . "yA' N _ z zi.0Mireheau Park Hotel I' .Tri Ave n E Ueam _et AveAue — 'a 2 a and.Corteenlion Center''- E Casalslo Ave E Cotaldt Ave L"ermrLd Li. E` w3 = [n E Castro Awe DT a L L'atatda Are a to a " z c a yToys"R"0a li 6larker High School C M;dlar Ala v ED Gateways delay Ave z E Broadway Ave a E.Broadway Ave E Broadway Ave EBroadway Ave E Broadway Ave E Broadwi EDVehicular Directionals North Pines Jr,, 2 ED Vehicular Directionals High School g z s y Z Espring.:relilA•rez ;r; l l Vehicular Directionals - L A1ki Ave m Progress co E Al,i Ave EAIki Avej -Elementary School400 Vehicular Directionals 74 . z CD Parking C Glave A.,m L olive Ave z 600 Pedestrian C E Vatlevw;.ry Ave d El z CU ll Trail Signage £'.Valleyway Ave EvanEywalr Ave %a4 g 3 EVaIEr?ywey Ave m 800 Miscellaneous z m Do ® ENIxun Aee z _ a IF y Library EMain Avn E Mal AVC n e"410, • -°t ., .. lokane Valley Library y�® c ¢ NOTES:. e al sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. F3'41 e GOodwil I nt. 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the Remarks column 0 E Sire a Ave Sprague AVE. x'71 E Sprague Ave Q E Sprague Ave V E Sprague Ave P] a.Refer to the Message schedule for the final messages of each sign. Q 4.lltil¢e the above Legend to help determine sign types and other details of to cafion. II OP Police/ Opportunity..m A tsr Ave Shopping center �Sullrvar Square f 1a Ave I7 District Court SaFewa 7 ENV IRON MENTS & EXPERIENCES O m y,,.Y, ¢ Shopping Center IE211Ave L 2atl Ave ,3 120 North Church Street Hall c'E 7n1 Ave 121311 r arc Ave 2 Aspen Village IMI I suite 208 ,57,E E 3rd Ave Apartmenia I I e rV e West Chester,PA 19380 T 4T T 484.266.0648 v. St Mary's Catholic School r• www.merjeclesign.com -0111 AveAE41h AveAVE4th Ave {q;h Ay .merjetlesign.com Cni SV Heritage %,. �1 N t Museum AR = DATE CLIENT/PROJECT �.� E 5th.Ave E sin Ave 2 03/27/15 n - DRAWN BY: E Frh Ave ® n E 6th Ave. a E fish Ara. .1 I[Mir Ave E&M Ave LH SPOKANE,WA E 7In AYE ea mese arawing:ora me,ntfor DESIGN Wayfinding and Signage System T' E_7th Avea ^71i:Ave INTENT ONLY and are not for wnatruction. 27 �` i.1' Contractor shall redly antl be responsible for all CENTRAL VALLEY Smensiens antlwntllaons of me lob.Contractor E 8th AveIGH sel'OOL shall bef ,' 'h thesitoa a tlinons PROJECT NO. pp:rt,.trtrf s, EBth Ave EBth Aveqve. bd co T! It prate Th office must be fietl of any mvs from the dimensions antl wndtions SHEET TITLE %Slh Ave SS E4vh Ave E9nFr Ave- - shown on this drawing.shop dravengs a. b N n - detils must be subset.to th'off' for to py, E 941-1Cr LL of approval par to proceetl'ngw hf b Oon. 9u wpy shall be proofread byllalegal Spokane Valley E 1L7;e.A. E1'jhAYP 1:1Grn Ave n' T n EI't]rn AVe regurements check.by legal tlp nt. v, " - Sign Location Plans : E 11 Ih Ave o Filth Ave REVISIONS a E11g1Avr L, o S SHEET NO. E12111 Ave E12tH Ave ami E 12th %1.Lh Awe - SV-SL.7 E:3th Ave m 0, E13th Ave. _- SPECIFICATIONS P. Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System design intent documentation for sign type drawings,material call- EZtePV r'°. z outs and installation methods. r Wabash, c k. YE4 rued Ave Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System CM) message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, quantities,and specific location details. esley Ave E Wellesley Ave ,tar.-l.,.lc Ave E Welie S6ey AeYg a a z p TO' Ierrry'AL'e - 7t E c1��s.j RKd c sT n s SI Joseph's Cemetery rJ y () sT mgfetlow Ave _ a a C? Siem�,ve Bayou Bar 8,Grill 7. ea ave ERich-Ave TreT+ 2(-10) 2,„1...:, Ave E Trerel A4e �• ETrent Ave J E Trent Ave SIGNAGE LEGEND E Lanrns-G'" EDGateways lir)Vehicular Directionals ED Vehicular Directionals ED Vehicular Directionals Spokane Industrial Park Wagstaff• y 400 Vehicular Directionals to r r Parking Z z SI 600 Pedestrian F n ED Trail Signage r. 800 Miscellaneous ruin Dome Winery E Codrtlend Ave Si - ' Ave a EPA' ✓Y NOTES: 1.General sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. Y 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the StiOn we Remarks column. Yeh=F Ion .... . ,.,n.4;n {;4a 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. 4.NtilLe the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of locafion. E t=ucl id Ave 'mo,'''n E Euclid Ave E.Euclid Ave ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES Spokane HDA:t• e,Vilvel I 120 North church Street t_Furl:rl Ave A'' ' W a Suite 208 EI e rV e �p West Chester,PA 19380 `7' '�"` rt Grace Ln T 484.266.0648 a _ www.merjedesign.com E Buckeye Ave. _ DATE CLIENT/PROJECT .�A u.ro„:._. 03/27/15 l'rr4,0 DRAWN 8v: LH SPOKANE,WA 4� - These arawing:are meant for DESIGN Wayfinding and Signage System 4 INTENT GNI .are not for wnstructlon. cocontractor shall.erlfy and be responsible for all !j kl' - Smenslcns andandlecns of the lob.contractor -• shall be familiar with the site and conmtions PROJECT NO. t prese Ths officebe nobfied of any � 'o f h d d s d'on SHEET TITLE 5t- I4 el - - shown on thsdraynng Shop dg d Barker Trailhead SPrfk1tie - detale b submttedtoth o efor approval prior to proceeding with fabccabon. (Centennial Trail) 9�� Ell copy shall be proofread by client and legal ... ., .. 4� E551 FONT W regsremento checked by legal department Spokane Valley �.�® d\o,-. fq Sign Location Plans u ..s. R C5'i$ C 2 w 01,6,Ss1f' REVISIONS E lar:iana Ave SHEET NO. 113. - 22 SV-SL.8 -- SPECIFICATIONS y Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System East Mission a E6akMvgr,SVe L It. 7 ENnIAAVN t design intent documentation for sign type drawings,materialcall- z z a outs and installation methods. (Centennial Trail) _ �' • e• ta 7 _ � Refer to the Spokane County Wayflnding and Signage System ®,. message schedule for all sign type messages,location numbers, cc k''k„rar'r1cfn 1•. 1 z a ' quantities,and spec fic location details. ,.r �� E Mission Ave E.Mission Ave 1, L E Mission Ave E Mission Ave I;h, AROkgtle�tyL' �F z. Elaanvell Ave River House of �q _ E Ms/malt Ave: a the Trailhead t1ia E. 'e 'i E Sino Ave n `ft `i YP LL Greeracres Park^... Z - a [Sharp Ave E2� Ave - .� in•Wendy's Hub Sports Gamer;.•. '' L 6cune aim - E 9rrane Ave €l Rye:(ht � eu [`u '-mon AV, 0. Freedom AV...,ski, Lowe's•:i§'. f.carats°rwe E Careleto Ave SIGNAGE LEGEND ED Gateways Allspedt- ED Vehicular Directionals SWay Ave E erd.,dway Ave E Broadway Ave cu ED Vehicular Directionals r, E EanngNel6.A.e Er)Vehicular Directionals 400 Vehicular Directionals E FMkl'Ave a SAMA. s m Gl Ft; 't, 0I pve r r Parking to z 3 600 Pedestrian 2 �¢n1 Gr ED Trail Signage p L Va71iwav Ave s n ,a.,,, Ler I"ye ” .. 800 Miscellaneous co c av Ave 1 .GreeaacTes.- ,,,,,P ., • . Shopping Center'-f'. V` yvz m Ave EMain Ave E Main Av. lei,al pya2 ice' L"t`y`y, NOTES: -.MA, fl 'c Mai-f p.v- Spokane Gun 1.general sign locations are provided on these plan sheets. A E •'Club Incorporated 2.The Message Schedule provides more detailed guidance of sign location in the , _. = Remarks column. 3.Refer to the Message Schedule for the final messages of each sign. E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave .. 4.uNize the above Legend to help determine sign types,and other details of location. g E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave E Sprague Ave ENVIRONMENTS & EXPERIENCES so d = E2nd Ave a 120 North Church Street v The Reserve al F _ n e ru e Suite 208 �y g — O1 West Chester,PA 19380 Shelley Lake L 3lJ.Ave w ;a, .w.N IN y E9:d Ln `"' r? 7484.266.0648 c.0411 AYH 9 .. www.merjedesign.com 11 A. - E A Ih Ave I.411,Ave E 5th Ih `- DATE CLIENT/PROJECT <r Es,n Ave a a 03/27/15 it' a Shed1 oke F6lrE.ve In DRAWN BY: LH SPOKANE,WA ¢ .y F c 6th Ave £. [ Wayfinding and Signage System L E6rh AVd These aravings are meant for DESIGN �,71II Ln N.. y INTENT ONLY and are not for wnstruction. � p� �i im contractor shall yen.and be responsible for all ClC i, dimension and andiecns of the lobcontractor shall be famil .1th me site and conmtions PROJECT NO. I[presents.Ths office must be notified of any ShcLese Creek I Rib Ln E Bth Ave z E Rth Ave arianon from the Smensions an,.ndinons SHEET TITLE f 2 .g shown h tl g.Shop tl g tl [ e Egshnve T u aetals b subset. h off too rT p�'C r1r� NI pproval M1 II b ar to P head by Ih f b tl legal 7 C} Spokane Valley ^''V'Ve* + h ktlby legaltlp department Ave .N rep�re Sign Location Plans C '20th R - _ - REVISIONS SHEET NO. 5 ''-'e` SV-SL.9 g 7 gveti1yh Aon a3-.,, E T1rh huo SECTION 3 I Message Schedule SIGN COUNT SUMMARY MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Project No.: 120 N.Church Street Submittal: Secondary Suite 208 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program Spokane Valley West Chester,PA 19380 Tel 484.266.0648 Date: 03/20/15 www.merjedesign.com Sign Type Quantity Phase TRAI L.1 8 1 TRAIL.2.b 1 1 TRAIL.2a 1 1 TRAIL.2b 4 1 TRAIL.2d 3 1 TRAIL.4 6 1 VDIR.1 10 1 VDIR.14 5 1 VDIR.15 5 1 VDIR.2 10 1 VDIR.3 2 1 VDIR.4 5 1 VDIR.5 2 1 VDIR.6 5 1 VDIR.9b 7 1 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT705 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.8 Centennial Trail Locate Near Parking lot Entry Barker Trailhead "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"< 1 SV CT706 TRAIL.2b 1 SV-SL.8 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Harvard Trailhead:Miles TBD >Liberty Lake side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Harvard Trailhead:Miles TBD <Liberty Lake Panel CD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <East Mission Trailhead:Miles TBD sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >East Mission Trailhead:Miles TBD 1 SV CT707 TRAIL.4 1 v "Centennial Trail'Logo Barker Trailhead Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 1 SV CT708 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.9 Centennial Trail East Mission "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 1 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT709 TRAIL.4 1 SV-SL.9 "Centennial Trail'Logo East Mission Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 1 SV CT710 TRAIL.2b 1 SV-SL.9 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Barker Trailhead:Miles TBD side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Barker Trailhead:Miles TBD Panel CD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Sullivan Trailhead:Miles TBD sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Sullivan Trailhead:Miles TBD 1 SV CT711 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.7 Centennial Trail Sullivan Trailhead "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 2 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT712 TRAIL.2.b 1 SV-SL.7 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >East Mission:Miles TBD side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <East Mission:Miles TBD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Mirabeau Trailhead South:Miles TBD <Spokane Valley Mall sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Mirabeau Trailhead South:Miles TBD >Spokane Valley Mall 1 SV CT713 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.6 Centennial Trail Mirabeau Trailhead S. "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 3 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT714 TRAIL.2d 1 SV-SL.6 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Sullivan Trailhead:Miles TBD >Spokane Valley Mall side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Centerplace A Discovery Playground <Sullivan Trailhead:Miles TBD <Spokane Valley Mall Panel CD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Mirabeau Trailhead North sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Mirabeau Point Park A YMCA >Mirabeau Trailhead North 1 SV CT715 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.6 Centennial Trail Mirabeau Trailhead N. "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 1 SV CT716 TRAIL.4 1 SV-SL.6 "Centennial Trail'Logo Mirabeau Trailhead N. Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 4 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT717 TRAIL.2d 1 SV-S L.6 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Mirabeau Trailhead South >Centerplace >Discovery Playground >YMCA side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Mirabeau Trailhead South <Centerplace <Discover Playground <YMCA Panel CD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Islands Trailhead sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Mirabeau Point Park >Islands Trailhead 5 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT718 TRAIL.2d 1 SV-SL.6 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Mirabeau Trailhead South >Centerplace >Discovery Playground >YMCA side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Mirabeau Trailhead South <Centerplace <Discover Playground <YMCA Panel CD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Islands Trailhead sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL ^Mirabeau Point Park >Islands Trailhead 1 SV CT719 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.2 Centennial Trail Islands Trailhead "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 1 SV CT720 TRAIL.4 1 SV-SL.4 "Centennial Trail'Logo Islands Trailhead Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 6 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT721 TRAIL.2b 1 SV-SL.4 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >Mirabeau Trailhead North:Miles TBD side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <Mirabeau Trailhead North:Miles TBD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Plantes Ferry Park/Stadium <East Maringo Drive:Miles TBD sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >East Maringo Drive:Miles TBD 1 SV CT724 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.2 Centennial Trail Boulder Beach "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD River"pictogram"A 1 SV CT725 TRAIL.4 1 SV-SL.2 ]"Centennial Trail'Logo Boulder Beach Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 7 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV CT726 TRAIL.2b 1 SV-SL.2 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >East Maringo Drive:Miles TBD side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <East Maringo Drive:Miles TBD side c: CENTENNIAL TRAIL <John C.Shields Park:Miles TBD <Upriver Dam sided: CENTENNIAL TRAIL >John C.Shields Park:Miles TBD >Upriver Dam 1 SV CT727 TRAIL.1 1 SV-SL.2 Centennial Trail John C.Shields Park "Centennial Trail"Logo Pictograms TBD 1 SV CT728 TRAIL.4 1 SV-SL.2 "Centennial Trail'Logo John C.Shields Park Centennial Trail River"pictogram"< side a:Centennial Trail Map side b:Blank 1 SV CT728a TRAIL.2a 1 SV-SL.2 Panel AB side a: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Boulder Beach Trailhead side b: CENTENNIAL TRAIL A Greene Street Trailhead:Miles TBD A Spokane:Miles TBD 8 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV203 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.3 >County Fair&Expo Center >Avista Stadium 1 SV SV204 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.3 <County Fair&Expo Center <Avista Stadium 1 SV SV205 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.3 >County Fair&Expo Center >Avista Stadium 1 SV SV206 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.3 <County Fair&Expo Center <Avista Stadium 1 SV SV210 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.2 <Felts Field Arpt Museum 1 SV SV211 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.2 >Felts Field Arpt Museum 1 SV SV211a VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.2 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Knipprath Cellars 1 SV SV217 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.5 <Dishman Hills Natural Area 1 SV SV218a VDIR.14 1 SV-SL.5 *park&ride pictogram* Pence Cole Transit 1 SV SV218b VDIR.14 1 SV-SL.5 *park&ride pictogram* Pence Cole Transit 1 SV SV219 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.5 <SplashDown City Hall> 9 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV221 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.5 <City Hall >Splash Down 1 SV SV222 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.7 >City Hall >SV Heritage Museum 1 SV SV222a VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.7 <Valley Hospital >SV Heritage Museum 1 SV SV222b VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.7 <SV Heritage Museum >Valley Hospital 1 SV SV222c VDIR.14 1 SV-SL.7 *park&ride pictogram* Pence Cole Transit 1 SV SV223 VDIR.2 1 SV-SL.7 <City Hall <SV Heritage Museum 1 SV SV223a VDIR.14 1 SV-SL.7 *park&ride pictogram* Pence Cole Transit 1 SV SV224 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.7 <Library*pictogram* 1 SV SV225 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.7 >Library*pictogram* 1 SV SV226 VDIR.5 1 SV-SL.7 <Splash Down >Valley Hospital 1 SV SV227 VDIR.4 1 SV-SL.7 >Splash Down NEXT RIGHT 10 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV230 VDIR.3 1 SV-SL.6 >Discovery Playground >Centerplace >Mirabeau Point Park 1 SV SV231 VDIR.3 1 SV-SL.6 <Discovery Playground <Centerplace <Mirabeau Point Park 1 SV SV232 VDIR.6 1 SV-SL.6 >Discovery Playground >Centerplace >Mirabeau Point Park 1 SV SV233 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.6 >Plantes Ferry Park/Stadium 1 SV SV234 VDIR.6 1 SV-SL.6 <Discovery Playground <Centerplace <Mirabeau Point Park 1 SV SV235a VDIR.4 1 SV-SL.6 <Plantes Ferry Park/Stadium 1 SV SV235b VDIR.4 1 SV-SL.6 >Plantes Ferry Park/Stadium 1 SV SV243 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.7 >Police/District Court 1 SV SV244 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.7 <Police/District Court 1 SV SV245 VDIR.15 1 SV-SL.9 Centennial Trail"Logo" Replace Existing P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" East Mission 11 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV246 VDIR.15 1 SV-SL.9 Centennial Trail"Logo" P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" Barker Trailhead 1 SV SV247 VDIR.15 1 SV-SL.9 Centennial Trail"Logo" P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" Barker Trailhead 1 SV SV248 VDIR.5 1 SV-SL.7 A Spokane Valley Mall Replace Existing >Business&Industrial Park 1 SV SV249 VDIR.4 1 SV-SL.7 <Business&Industrial Park 1 SV SV250 VDIR.4 1 SV-SL.7 Centennial Trail"Logo" Replace Existing Bike"pictogram" Sullivan Trailhead 1 SV SV251 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.6 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Mountain Dome Winery 1 SV SV252 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.6 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Mountain Dome Winery 1 SV SV253 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.6 <Plantes Ferry Park/Stadium 1 SV SV254 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.4 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Arbor Crest 12 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV255 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.4 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Arbor Crest 1 SV SV256 VDIR.15 1 SV-SL.2 Centennial Trail"Logo" P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" John C.Shields Park 1 SV SV257 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.4 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Nodland Cellars 1 SV SV258 VDIR.9b 1 SV-SL.4 Spokane Wineries"Logo" Nodland Cellarsv 1 SV SV259 VDIR.14 1 SV-SL.6 *pictogram* Park&Ride A 1 SV SV260 VDIR.6 1 SV-SL.6 <Discovery Playground <Centerplace <Mirabeau Point Park 1 SV SV260a VDIR.15 1 SV-SL.6 Centennial Trail"Logo" P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" Mirabeau Trailhead N.&S. 1 SV SV261 VDIR.6 1 SV-SL.6 >Discovery Playground >Centerplace >Mirabeau Point Park 13 SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE MERJE I ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES Client: Spokane County,WA Submittal: Secondary 120 N.Church Street Spokane Valley Suite 208 Date: 03/20/15 West Chester,PA 19380 Project: Spokane County Wayfinding&Signage Program 484.266.0648 www.merjedesign.com Phase LocationNo.: Sign Type: Qty.: Sheet No.: Message: Comments: 1 SV SV261a VDIR.6 1 SV-SL.6 Centennial Trail"Logo" P"pictogram" Bike"pictogram" Mirabeau Trailhead N.&S. 1 SV SV262 VDIR.1 1 SV-SL.2 >Felts Field Arpt Museum 14