ZE-0106B-72 ~
,
.
~
SPOKANE COUNTX HEARING EXAMINER
RE Change of Conditions to a Pnor Zone )
Reclassificatlon, in the Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Applicant Woodruff Heights Ltd Ptnr ) AND DECISION
File No ZE-106B-72 )
)
This matter coming on for public hearing on June 13, 2001, the Hearing Examiner, after
review of the change of conditions application and the entire record, hereby makes the following
findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision
I FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The application requests a change of conditions to a pnor zone reclassification and a pnor
change of conditions, in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone
2 The site is generally located at the northwest corner,9f the intersection of 6u' Avenue and
Woodruff Road, in the NW '/4 of Section 20, Townsh.ip 2'4 orth, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
CountY, Washington
3 The site is currently designated as County Assessor's taac parcel nos 45202 9069 and
45202 9068
4 The owner of tax parcel no 45202 9068 is Hidden Pines Lunited Partnership, 525 East
Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202-1824 The owner of tax parcel no 45202 9069 is
Woodruff Heights Limlted Partnership, 525 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202-1824
5 The applicant for the proposal is Woodruff Heights Lunited Partnership, 525 East Mission
Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202-1824
6 The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Heanng Examiner
Ordinance (County Resoluhon No 96-0171) and the County Heanrig Examiner Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294)
7 The requirements for public notice have been met
8 A public heanng was held on the proposed rezone on June 13, 2001
9 The following persons testified at the public heanng
Jun Falk Scott Engelhard
Division of Planning Division of Engineering
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 1
~
,
y
Bnan Westby
1720 West 4`hAvenue
Spokane, WA 99202
10 The County Division of Planrung issued a Deternlulation of Nonsigruficance for the
proposal on May 25, 2001
11 The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Comprehensive Plan, the County Zoning
Code, other applicable development regulations, and recent land use decisions in the vicinity
11 The record includes the documents in File Nos ZE-106-72, ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72 and
ZE-106B-72 at the time of t.he public heanng, the documents submitted at the public heanng, the
letter dated 6-15-01 from Fire Distnct No l, the letter dated July 6, 2001 from the Heanng
Examiner to Frank Carpenter, and the items taken notice of by the Examiner
12 The site is 3 27 acres in size and is generally flat in topography, except for slopes up to
20% on its northerly portion The property is rectangular in shape, except for a 20-foot wide
stnp of land that extends from the northwest corner of the main body of the site west to Farr
Road The northerly portion of the site is improved with multi-family dwelling uruts, which are
currently occupied The southerly portion of the subject property is improved with multi-family
units that are neanng completion, and whlch are currently unoccupied
13 A 50-foot wide nght of way for Woodruff Road abuts the southerly two-tlurds of the site
on the east The nght of way connects to Woodruff Road and Sixth Avenue at the southeast
corner of the subject property The nght of way is currently un.improved, and is occupied by
several pine trees A bluff wrth north-facing slopes up to 20% are found directly north of the
nght of way, which features would make it difficult to extend the nght of way further to the
north as a public road Woodruff Road extends from the nght of way south to 8" Avenue Sixth
Avenue abuts the site on the south
14 In 1977, the site was rezoned to the Mulhple Family Suburban zone, under the now expired
County Zoning Ordinance, for the development of no more than 55 garden apartment uruts This
was in Plantung File No ZE-106-72 County Engineenng condition # 10 attached to such
approval required that the adjoirung nght of way for Woodruff Road be improved to county
public road standards
15 In 1977, 7 34 acres of land lying directly west of the site were rezoned to the Multiple
Family Suburban zone, under the now expired County Zorung Ordinance, to allow development
of no more than 120 apartment uruts Tlus was in Planning File No ZE-59-72
16 Effective January 1, 1991, the zoning of the site, as well as the 7 34 acres involved in File
No ZE-59-72, were reclassified to the Urban Residential-22 (LTR-22) zone, pursuant to the
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zorung Code Under the terms of the Program to
Implement, the conditions of approval attached to the 1972 rezones in File Nos ZE-106-72 and
ZE-59-72 continued to apply to the subJect properties See County Resolution No 85-0900
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 2
/
17 In 1993, a change of conditions was approved for approximately 5 3 acres of land
consisting of the site and 1 64 adjacent acres that were part of the rezone site in File No ZE-59-
72 This was in Planning File No ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72 The decision approved a revised
conceptual site plan for multi-family development of the 5 3 acres under the UR-22 zone, and
removed restrictions on building heights and densities imposed by the previous rezones in File
Nos ZE-59-72 and ZE-106-72 The decision denied a request to delete County Engineenng
condition #10 of the previous rezone in File No ZE-106-72, wluch required that the adjoining
nght of way for Woodruff Road be improved to county public road standards
18 The site is designated in the Urban category of the County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan The subJect property also lies inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area, Pnonty Sewer Service
Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Generalized Comprehensive Plan
19 The site is located inside the intenm urban growth area boundanes designated by the
County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act
20 The County Artenal Road Plan designates 4"' Avenue and Farr Road in the viciruty as a
Collector A.rtenal, 8`" Avenue to the south as a Minor Artenal, and Dishman-Mica Road to the
west as a Pnricipal Artenal Woodruff Road and 6" Avenue are considered Local Access road
21 The current change of conditions application requests deletion of County Engineenng
condrtion #10 imposed by the change of condifiions approved in File Nos ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-
72 The site plan of record submitted on February 22, 2001 illustrates development of the site
under the current change of condrtions The srte plan illustrates a dnveway access to 6u' Avenue
and a dnveway access to the adjacent nght of way for Woodruff Road The applicant proposed
to pave a pnvate driveway to a width of 25 feet in the adjacent nght of way for access, with
parking prohlbited withln the nght of way in order to facilitate emergency access The proposed
dnveway is illustrated in a"cla.nfication drawi,ng" dated June 9, 2000
22 The land lying west of the site is improved with multi-family dwellings, under the UR-22
zone 1'he location of housmg unrts on the site plan of record for the current change of
conditions is dissunilar to the location of housing ututs illustrated respectively on the site plans
of record in File Nos ZE-59-72, ZE-106-72 and ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72 Such changes do not
appear substantial enough to warrant a separate change of conditions application
23 The land lying east of the site is zoned Urban Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5) and is undeveloped
and forested The land lying south of the site across 6' Avenue, and the land lying north of the
site, is zoned UR-3 5 and is developed with single-family homes
24 County Engineenng conditions of approval for the proposal authonzed the applicant to
locate a paved dnveway with one connection point in the adjacent nght of way, in lieu of
improving the nght of way to public road standards The change of condihons does not prevent
extension of the subject nght of way to the north as a public road, if found to be necessary in the
future
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 3
~
~
25 Fire Distnct 1 conditions of approval for the proposal require the dnveway access to be
paved and maintained to a width of 25 feet, with 4"no parking" signs located on erther side of
the dnveway spaced approxlmately 50 feet apart, and a sign installed stating that a named towing
company will illegally tow vehicles from the parlang lane
26 No opposition to the proposal, as conditioned, was expressed by neighbonng property
owners or public agencies The project is compatible with neighbonng land uses
27 The proposal wlll remain subject to the conditions of approval imposed in File No
ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72, except for the new conditions recommended by public agencies
28 The site and the adjacent 1 64 adjacent acres involved in File No ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72
has adequate vehicular access to the County road system, via 6" Avenue, Woodruff Road and
Sunderland Road
29 The proposal, as conditioned, will not have a significant impact on the environment or
impact neighbonng properties The DNS issued for the project is appropnate
30 The Staff Report adequately analyzes the consistency of the project with the
Comprehensive Plan, the development standards of the UR-22 zone, and the change of
conditions approved in File No ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72 Such analysis is hereby adopted and
incorporated by reference as findings of fact herein
Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following
II CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1 The proposed change of conditions, as conditioned, generally conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan
2 The applicant has established that the changed conditions bears a substantial relationship
to, and/or will not be detnmental to, the public health, safety or welfare
3 The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local
Environmental Ordulance have been met
4 The proposal, as conditioned, complies with the UR-22 zone, the County Zoning Code, and
other applicable development regulations
5 The proposed rezone meets the cntena established in Section 14 504 040 of the County
Zorung Code for a change of conditions application
6 Approval of the land use application is appropnate under the cntena established for the
approval of land use applications in Section 11 of the County Heanng Examiner Ordinance,
adopted by County Resolution No 96-0171
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 4
/
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law above, the above application for a
change of conditions application is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the vanous
public agencies specified below
Any changes to pubic agency conditions added or significantly altered by the Examiner are
ctalictzed
Failure to comply with the conditions of tlus approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Heanng Examiner This approval does not wasve the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies withjunsdiction over land development
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1 All condihons unposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant,"
whlch term shall include the owner, developers and users of the property, and their heirs, assigns
and successors
2 The Change in Conditions applies only to the site, which is legally descnbed as "The East
278 feet of the North 547 feet of the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/4 of the NW '/4, and the North 20
feet of the West 382 feet of the East 660 feet of the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/4 of the NW '/4, of
Section 20, Townshlp 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County Washington, Except county nghts
of way " The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel nos 45202 9068 and
45202 9069
3 The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the site plan of record
submitted on February 22, 2001, subject to compliance with conditions of approval and
development regulations Minor vanations may be pernutted admirustratively by the County
Division of Planning, in accordance with Section 14 504 040 of the County Zorung Code All
other variations must be approved through the submittal of a change of conditions application,
for approval by the Hearing Examiner after a public heanng
4 Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific hghting and signulg
plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building permits
5 Direct light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
6 The improvement of Woodruff Road shall be consistent with Spokane County Dnveway
Standards, County Division Building and Code Enforcement Bulletin B-17 The parking of
vehicles is prohibited within the nght of way
7 The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Nohce, wluch notes that the srte is subject to a vanety of special conditions imposed as a resu0lt
of approval of a land use action T'he Trtle Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 5
t
approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same
time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division
of Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows
"The parcel of property legally descnbed as `The East 278 feet of the North 547 feet of
the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/4 of the NW '/4, and the North 20 feet o£ the West 382 feet of the
East 660 feet of the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/o of the NW '/4, of Section 20, Township 25N,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County Washington, Except county nghts of way', is the subject of a
land use action by the Spokane County Heanng Examiner on August 16, 2001, in Plaruung File
No ZE-106B-72, imposing a vanety of special development conditions File No ZE-106B-72 is
available for inspechon and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planxung "
8 The Division of Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal from the Heanng Examiner's decision, including lapsing of the
appeal penod, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows
"Pnor to the issuance of any building pernut for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The
property wluch is the subject of this notice is more particularly descrrbed as follows `The East
278 feet of the North 547 feet of the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/4 of the NW '/4, and the North 20
feet of the West 382 feet of the East 660 feet of the South 1,155 feet of the SE '/4 of the NW '/4, of
Sectlon 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County Waslungton, Except county nghts
of way "
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1 The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the eaxliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admirustered/enforced as authonzed
by the state Building Code Act Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type,
occupancy classification, existing extenor wall protection and energy code requirements
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Pnor to release of a building perrmit or use of properiy as proposed, the following conditions shall
be complied with
1 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement
of Woodruff Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the
addition of approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed
Note In lieu of the above stated road improvements, the County Engineer will allow for
the location of a paved dnveway with one connechon point to the multi-family units The
applicant shall submit drainage plans for the dnveway to be reviewed and accepted by the
County Engineer pnor to construction Spokane County will not maintain the dnveway,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 6
I
therefore, the applicant shall sign and record a"Spokane County Notice to the Public No 4"
which allows for the construction and maintenance of a dnveway in the public nght-of-way
Any additional access to the Woodruff Road Right-of-Way is prohibited until such time as
authonzed by the County Engineer
3 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane County Resolutton No 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
4 The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work
5 All other County Engineenng conditions of approval imposed in County Plan.ning File No
ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72 shall be complied with, except for County Engineenng Condition Nos
10 and 13, which are replaced by the conditions herein
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1 The sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authonzed
5 The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed A
sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit histoncal andlor
estimated water usage pnor to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer
fees
2 The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under
separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public
sewer connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial and institutional
developments shall submit lustoncal and/or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan
submittal
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 7
3 Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance
of the sewer construction permit
4 Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made pnor to issuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
5 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
6 See memorandum dated March 14, 2001 from County Stormwater Utility
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All applicable air pollution regulations must be met
SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
1 Fire District 1 will allow the secondary access to this development within the Woodruff
Road right of way to be built to the dnveway standard, including maintenance of a paved width
of 25 feet
2 Four (4) "No Parking" signs shall be located on either side of the pnvate lane, with each
sign placed approximately 50 feet apart A sign shall be placed indicating that a named towing
company will tow illegally parked cars
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 8
•
t
DATED this 16`t' day of August, 2001
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
~
Mic6el C Dempsey, WSBAA21~`
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner
on an application for a conditional use permit is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one
(21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land
use petition in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter 36 70C
RCW, the date of issuance of the Hearrng Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mailed
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to
other parties of record, on August 16, 2001 The date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's
decision is therefore August 20, 2001, counting to the next business day when the last day for
mailing falls on a weekend or holiday THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS
DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS SEPTEMBER lOT
2001.
The complete record in tlus matter, including this decision, is on file dunng the appeal
penod with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be
inspected Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a m and
5 00 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by
Spokane County
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-106B-72 Page 9
r g
E'TL3J1:t1 S13451!, ACti4'e ~INEERIIJ RLi 1" ~HEli~i
Ai Btsiit Pians Rceeivcd Rezone F1le ZI "0106B-72
R~3ad I'luras r'4pproved
C'k,mpaniarr E'i1c;
New [tcud Su, nduriSs 5 - 1 4 £.95 M y Ear ~
[W:iti:d r-._?_~J06-72 i`G.0059r'1,-72ZE-0050_02
lit:ari.trg. 0611__V200 1 10:30 Ruikiing"T'kp,
Technical Review: 0311_&'2001 115 liarvz.r+d Rd I'Isrr
P'reliniirr~rv Review=
__j l,argr Lut Bldg Skji;a.c Frc.
Date ftcc€i.°td: 03:`0 1°2001 Nn, t.:ots: No.:"4cn::,
Iyrt~ler t Nan1e Ui2=22 CFiG OF C'l~~ D RE'vFSION OF Ei'~~ ~OND 00
Sitc Address S. 04ITt. N 00 M. E. FA RR 4N. Wt='0 l'?R ( lF F..
Appiic.aitt ~.•ij:~`aq11R1_!'4`4tILNi.
Bryari Weszby Ccandition4 4bi9ed: ~jj~
ADAivtfi & C'1_.rkRK f=Eoot~ ~oinf iop,
1720 "4'4' 4111 r\a Water 5ourL,2
,aOUG~:~
Sf't.31~..~RE. "~~l,A ~~9'04- fiewo~t'
P'I•i+one ~50)7474W1 fichn,°ai Dist =;aF
l'ax (509) 747-80 [3 F-tre Di;,! l
Plionc IaiSa
Freg I3iUing [lwner
I`rust'k Catpeiitcr Fr-anlt E'arpentcc
Wt7ODR[.;'T-~' t-i'e•.I6 f i' S a iF'a
WOODRL1r[= IICTGI '1T4 LTD 525 E. Misaion Av ~'ompaa4' Arcfiitect
:+?i ~.'+w[t~~~~ ~1~
5~~'OK.~.:`~1E,.~4'A 99?C12- [i+:~'E(aR L;S ;~.'H
til'~~w,.r1.[~1~,'~'w"r~ f)fi~{}~`- E'h~.~t~e (+~M!)jw84•~~e`33 F'linn,4 ~i~~14) ~4$~-ti~3?~ 10 S. !C'Kd3r
fax fSCr+il 48-1-0341 Fax (509) 483-n,145 SPOKANT",, W',"ti 1j9rW
P1ione 009j US-S691
4qnied N2nx:: JA4"NEAUL[] ( ar (509) R?-S-? 1:i-1
A4tdltling 477.3675 J-11arirtang -177--,200 -177-1000 ('on[act 134' Jw:hr41,11 K ;.Nt;E=5 i Il`1-)
Date Suhniitted Descriptiwn Inirinfs
Fng Nced Tcchnitally Conaploi: Eng N~c6 F1nrv:yrk1 Rd Wig:iiccu
E-ttg Necd Drai6aage 1''iars Fng N+erd "l"rufTic Avalys'rs k•~a~r t4etd 0111GG
01f24,`20Gl Eng Agr~~ Pfty Fcc5 ktcceiveci f~g ririul PIaw T'ecs Camplcttd Cri`h'±, [o A~tioiaG'diilb,
Eiig;Agrice i'nonTy Recetivcc1 =30-001 Fniz 1'Wim 6'Iot 1=vcs Coniplct,:d
NiUtIc ' ~R1 ~~Li%~{!' `~'i°i14c lMJ ~}litlllW 11 C ~'rTYIPj'Cj44! - l3C I~il.."'i:d4 1iY t%c s~'."IiSC:I~ I
Ilearir,g Dare 0co si+un App ' Den _ C0114 f1ppCd 13( f:'
Appra1ed to BCC Decisron App Dcn. Cond Applt?
:'~ppeaied 10 COLti Drcision App Nn Coaid App5c,
' Stamped S1y1iim tu Secretary (Sanc9y)
, "tilintped 208 Ltit T'Ians (Sandy}
~
i
t .
~
ENGINEER'S RE4IIEW SHEEi'
€'~a : ~Q~s.~~ act~►~~
As l3ualti l'9iti-,'~ccCivecl R@z~~e FLre #s ZE-010VB-72
Road I'ians Appravcd
ComRanion Files.
Roud SrZ11da"a, 5-15 -95 MN ::11- t::
° R:'Eated HleS: ZE-0106-72 r'1-54A_72 Zf_-Q~~~0-7_1
Ficuring= EluiiiJitsg I]cpt' 5J'vI' 2-1J~b'
I'eL hYi ti't~l Re1'F@ w": U 1511,001 ? : 15 E l3Tv aM Rd Pl371
Prrlirrairsaa-y Review: TYpe= ~ laugc UL Lildg. Squaxc 3~i~et
Uatc~ Rccrive+l: 43101,7001 Project ?rarne IfR-22 C'HG ('1F C(li~D REVISIfIN OF ENG ("C)NA 4I0
tisie Address S. 04 iH, N. 0-6TH, E. FARK, 'A' W'U-0f)RUFF,
:#pIMlirarlt .44_ - 20 P.kRC`F[_(S): ~tcr&i 20)
Lirv:uk Wesr.Fsy Cdr►ditlnns Mailcd
A. [lAh1 S & CLARr. Fl uod Zotlc N+., - -
720 W. 4111 Av JLpilf'L.'i.13Ls WX1 992(4- 41h~~~ ~T1.1~lTii
E'Itictic (50'_~) 7474609 Srhkiol Dist
Fax (5046 747•S 913 .
hrz hiSt i
i'~Onr l y;i'.
C?wner
Feaclr. C"rPrFhlri
WOC3C3RI.)f:r° k-;!, E4 ;1-I i! )
Eng Hi#Ilrag 525 E. Mxa,5ron Av Caiyipanti Are'>>a[rci
Frazik CarxripLr S3'OKANE,Wri 99202-
WOODRUrr Hr,:rGM, t_TD e~hLinc (509) 484-6733 irrTEGRtrs ARc_ I I
:±2.5 E. lr4issiarx Ar• Fat ('509) 483-03-45
1tJ,~. ~:~~➢ar
S 6'~[~1~1.NE. ~I'~~~7?-
Pht:rne i5F}~'~i1 484-6+33 SF'OKANE, '&A 11'+2i1-1
Fax {afl9j483-03-45 1'hant: (:+0911 938-Xrl,~:
SipzkirilNarrac: JAYNEeAULi) f3uddir1iYh: -:77-3675 ' Plasiniris; E'Li 4771-_~2U5 FAI_t:.
I]we Submitic4d Descriptioii Lt~~ti~l~
El1}g Nced"1'ratniLa9ly cumptctr Er~g NcarJ fiarvard ~~iOgaUokp,
l-ng ,'+~~ed Drninage Plans Fng Need 'rratfic Araa!} sis
C~i:24420ol En-,Agrec Pay Fr+es Rece~~~e-d Fng T'inal Plar Fees f,'orrrpictx•:; _
y~,
P~,~ ,~1,~t~:4 il IQ'FiCS" ~~F'.eS y~ i1~G'i'1}.jVC'.d 0112312001 Eng F~vlim F'lat Fees C'omplctc0
~ NoitCic To 1"ubll+,; 'Noiqt`s' ;o k'o~whit rt C 1 •1
'
1~.~:~~ ~~a°;:~.~4~~ ~1:;ii.~,, ~ln•(~~tiNl
f~ 'J d
I#oaring t7aw Lkclsian App DL-rr C"onc3 A{sp9d IW[,
Appaalc:d to 13+LC Ikc3,510n AFp Vkm {'onc# Appld
Ap}'waIt,°l I,o C olLly. D41`I511Jf3 App Den Contl .A~~id
SEpmped M}~lar:s t€7 SeA~rctasy (Sanc3y) ~
Sfi~rn~!0~~'0;~ Lr,s P1.~~is tr7 ~tfirCC.~r} f"~ar~d~yl
~
~
/
~
7
~
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
" ZE-106B-72
III DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOKANE COUT%=
HEARING DATE June 13, 2001 at 10 30 a m FiLE # ZE-106B-72
PROJECT PLANNER Jim Falk, AICP
Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION A Change of Condition to an existing zone reciassification (ZE-
106A-72) to modify Division of Engineering Condition # 10 to allow
improvement of Woodruff Road to Spokane County private driveway
standards
Project Data
Project Location The subJect property is generally located at the
northwest corner of the intersection of 6tn
Avenue and Woodruff Road in the NW '/4 of
Section 20, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, WA
Parcel Number 45202 9069 and 45202 9068
Owner Woodruff Heights Limited Partnership
525 E Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204
Agent Bryan Westby, Adams and Clark Engineering
1720 W 4th Avenue , Spokane, WA 99202
Comprehensive Plan Urban (U)
Designation
Existing Zoning Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
Existing Land Use. Multifamily dwellings and accessory structures
Surrounding Zoning° and Land Uses.
• North The adjoining property to the north is zoned
Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5), previously
zoned Agncultural Suburban (AS), and the
land use is single family dweliings
• SouthThe adJoining property to the south is zoned
Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5), previously
zoned Agricultural Suburban (AS), and the
land use is single family dwellings
• East The adJoining property to the east is zoned
Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5), previously
zoned Agricultural (A), and the land use is
undeveloped and forested
• West. The adJoining property to the west is zoned
Urban Residentiai-22 (UR-22), previously
zoned Multlifamily Suburban (MFS), and the
land use is multifamily
F
.
Y
Known Land Use Proposals and + Recent land use proposals and project
Recent Project Approvals in the approvals within the vicinity of the subject
Area of this Project parcels
• ZE-59-72, a zone reclassification from
Agricultural (A) to Multifamily Suburban
(MFS) now zoned Urban Residential-22
(UR-22), located adjacent to and
immediately west of the subject parceis
• ZE-59A-72, a Change of Conditions to
modify building height and road
improvement requirements and allow higher
density of development
• ZE-18-89/ZE-50A-87, a zone reclassification
from Commercial O and Multifamily
Suburban (MDS) to Regional Business (B-
3) to permit expansion and remodel of he
University City Shopping Center adding
450,00 square feet of retail area
• ZE-18A-89, a change in conditions to a
reclassification to alter landscaping,
drainage, signage and parking requirements
and right of way road width for the University
City Shopping Center The request was
partially approved in 1998
• ZE-24-98, a rezone from Urban Residential-
22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) to
develop a dessert shop/bakery adjacent to
and east of University Road between 2"d
Avenue and 3`d Avenue
• ZE-48-97, a rezone from Urban Residential-
3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-
22) to develop retirement/elderly
apartments, located on University Road
between 7t' Avenue and 8th Avenue
• ZE-44-86, a zone reclassification from
Residential Manufactured Home to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) 500 feet west of the
subject parcels south of and adjacent to 4`h
Avenue, approved in December 1986
• ZE-8-98, a zone reciassification from
Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional
Business (B-3) on Sprague Avenue between
Locust and Farr Roads
L.and Divisron Status• The subject parcels were created by Short Plat
SP-1216-99 which was recorded in December
1999
~hore~ine Designation: Not Applicable
Wa~er Purveyor: --Ppokane C:ounty Witer Uistrict-93 and
Modern Electric Water Company
tiewage Uisposal. bpokane County banitary bewers
-'I;;ire istrict-k ~ire istricf-91
ZE-106B-72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Heanng
2
.
V
~ School District Central Valley School Distnct #356
Nearest Arterial and Distance 8`" Avenue, the Spokane County Arterial Road
Plan designates as a Minor Arterial, and is 700
feet south of the project site and Dishman-Mica
Road as a Prinapal Arterial, located 2000 feet
west of the project site
Neighborhood Association None
• This proposal is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA)
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA)
• This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural
Resource Lands
GMAICritical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area SubJect property is located inside the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay
Zone
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation None illustrated on the Spokane County
Areas Critical Area Maps
Floodplain None iliustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Area Maps
Geologically Hazardous None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Area Maps
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Area Maps or Wetland Inventory
Maps
SEPA
DNS issued May 25, 20001
Comment period ended June 11, 2001
Noticinq
Published Spokesman Review legal notice section on May 25, 2001
Deadline by which notice must be mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the project site
was May 29, 2001
Deadline by which notice must be posted on the subject property was May 29, 2001
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete) February 22, 2001
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued April 12, 2001
Date Notice of Decision is Due August 11, 2001
Reviewinq Agencies
12 agencies were notified on 3-1-2001 and 5-17-2001 Comments were due on 3-15-2001 and 5-
30-2001
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received
Spokane County Yes 3-15-01 Modern Electric Water No
Division of Engineering 5-30-01 Company
and Roads,
ZE-1068•72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Heanng
3
i
X
and Roads, '
Transportation
Spokane County Yes 3-2-01 Fire District No 1 Yes 3-14-01
Division of Engineering,
Development Services
Spokane County Yes 3-6-01 Spokane Regionai Yes 3-15-01
Division of Utilities- 5-29-01 Health District 5-29-01
Sewer
Spokane County Yes 3-14-01 Spokane County No
Division of Utilities- Water Distnct No 3
Stormwater
Central Valley School No Spokane County Yes 3-1-01
District #356 Division of Building
and Code
Enforcement
Washington State No Spokane County Air Yes 3-6-01
Boundary Review Bd Pollution Control Auth
Responses from the Public
No letters were received from nearby property owners or from other members of the public as of
the date of this report
AQencv Comments
Agency comments are in the form of recommended conditions or specify no comment
Description of the Site The subJect parcels are developed with multifamily dwellings and accessory
structures and improvements Access to the subject parcels is provided by 6`h Avenue The public
right of way adjacent to and east of the subject parcel is an unimproved pubiic road named Woodruff
Road which is the subject of this application The multifamily units on the south tax parcel
(45202 9069) are occupied and the multifamily units on the north tax parcel (45202 9068) are nearing
completion and not yet occupied Several pine trees occupy the subJect Woodruff Road right-of-way
and the right-of-way is relatively level
Surroundinq Conditions The adjoining area to the south and north are developed with single
family dwellings and the adjoining area to the west and southeast are developed with multifamily
complexes The adjoining area to the east is undeveloped
Site Plan and Backqround The site plan indicates development of multifamily dwellings and the
plan is consistent with the original zone reclassification, ZE-106-72 The site development plan
upon which the original zone reclassification approval was based provides that access to the
subject parcels be provided by 6th Avenue and Farr Road Access from Woodruff Road is allowed
if the road is improved to Spokane County road standards The condition of approval requested
to be modified is Condition #10 of the Division of Engineering and Roads included in the October
221 1993 Heanng Examiner Committee approvai of Change in Condition Application # ZE-106A-
72 The specific wording of Condition #10 is as follows
uThe County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local Access
standard for the improvement of Woodruff Road, which is adjacent to the proposed
development This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the
frontage of the development The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required ZE-10613-72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Heanng
4
The Change of Condition application requests modification of the original condition of approval to
allow the construction of Woodruff Road to County driveway standards The applicant states in
the application that Woodruff Road north of 6`h Avenue is currently a dead end street right-of-way
Due to topographical constraints, i e an estimated 20% slope at the north terminus of the subject
right-of-way, makes extension of Woodruff Road physicaily unlikely and possibly cost prohibitive
for the County The right of way ends at a bluff and a road extension of any kind to the north
would require going through existing homes The applicant states further that constructing the
proposed driveway will aid emergency vehicular access and reduce everyday vehicular traffic
access through the Village and Woodruff Apartment complexes
At the time that ZE-106-72 was approved, the Division of Engineering and Roads assumed that
Woodruff Road would be a thru-street connecting 6th Avenue with 4t' Avenue and the Division
determined that it was desirable that any improvement of Woodruff Road would be to Spokane
County public road standard The connection to 4th Avenue is now not probable as determined
by the Division of Engineering and Roads
The original site plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners in November 1977, ZE-
106-72, iliustrated two accesses onto 6t' Avenue, but only one access was provided The
applicant would like to provide second access (the subject of this application) to the subject
parcels in order to provide safe and convenient access for emergency vehicles and for the future
occupants of the multifamily complex the northern tax parcel (45202 9068) of the project site In
September of 1993 the owners of the subJect parcels applied for a Change of Conditions, file
number ZE-106A-72 One change of condition requested by the applicant was to delete the
requirement to improve Woodruff Road to Spokane County Public road standard and dedicate it
to the County The Hearing Examiner Committee denied this change of condition in its October
1993 decision based on the recommendations of the Division of Engineenng and Roads The
Woodruff Road right-of-way was acquired by the County in August of 1974
Staff Analysis
The County Comprehensive Plan The project site and adJoining properties are designated
Urban by the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan The area surrounding the subject parcels
are classified Urban The Urban category is intended to provide a city-like environment which
includes various land use, public facilities and services The Goals, ObJectives and Decision
Guidelines identified in Section 1(Urban Category) of the Comprehensive Plan are normally used
to determine whether a proposal in the Urban category shouid be approved, approved with
conditions or denied However, the proposal is essentially a road improvement matter and is
analyzed for consistency with the Transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan, Section 21
Therefore, the below analysis is limited to consideration of the proposed Change-of-Condition
regarding the Woodruff Road improvement requirement since this is the only issue under
consideration
Page 247 of the Comprehensive Plan specifies that the primary function of locai access roads is
to provide access to adjacent property They should be designed and located to provide
convenient access to residential lots and to discourage continuous or unobstructed flows of traffic
through the neighborhood The alignment and traffic control measures should encourage a slow,
safe speed Parking lanes, separated sidewalks and street plantings are features that help to
make the neighborhood a nicer place to live The improvement of Woodruff Road to County
driveway standards will enhance convenient access to the subJect residential parcel The short
distance and dead end characteristics of the road should discourage high speeds A parking lane
will not be provided to enable emergency vehicles sufficient area to access the northern portion of
the multifamily development Type III plantings are proposed adjacent to the west boundary of
the subject right-of-way between the road and adjacent multifamily structures located on the
subject parcels Sidewalks are not proposed to be constructed
ZE-1068-72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Hearing
5
i
, j
Page 248 of the Comprehensive Plan specifies that parking lanes are generally desirable on
roads designed primarily to provide access to adJacent property, such as local access roads and
neighborhood collector arterials Seven-foot parking lanes are adequate for local access roads
and eight-foot parking lanes for collector arterials No parking lanes are proposed Fire District
No 1 recommends that on-street parking be prohibited to enable unimpeded 24 hours a day
access to the subject parcels by its emergency vehicles The proposal is inconsistent with this
guideline Provision for a parking lane would hinder access to the srjbJect northern parcel by
emergency vehicles
Page 248 also specifies that sidewalks provide the primary facilities utilized by pedestrians
moving about the urbanized areas of the County Sidewalks help eliminate accidents involving
pedestrtans who might otherwise be walking, standing, or playing in the street They are of major
importance to elderly and handicapped persons because alternative modes of travel may not be
available to them for economic reasons, or due to physical barriers All sidewalks should be a
minimum of six feet in width and wider in areas where pedestrian traffic is heavy such as
commercial centers and high-density residential areas All planting strips should be a minimum of
seven feet except on local access roads The proposal does not include sidewalks but does
proposed Type ill landscaping The proposai is partially consistent with this guideline
Page 249 of the Comprehensive Plan specifies that street lighting should be provided within the
urbanized areas of the County in order to provide for vehicular/pedestrian safety and crime
prevention The location of street lights should be within road nght-of-way but clear of sidewalks
Street lighting is not proposed The proposal is inconsistent with this guideline
Page 260 of the Comprehensive Plan sets forth Local Access Road standards as follows
Function To provide access to adJacent residential property
Right-of-way width 60 feet
Building setback At least 25 feet from right-of-way
Width between curbs 36-foot minimum
Moving lanes 2
Daily volume Variable
Access conditions Intersections at grade with direct access to adJacent property
Traffic features Alignment designed to encourage slow, safe speed Traffic control measures
as warranted to provide adequate sight distance and safety
Planning features Should be designed and located to provide convenient access to residential
lots and to encourage continuous or unobstructed flow of traffic from neighborhood to
neighborhood collector arterials Through traffic from one neighborhood to another should be
discouraged by offset access road alignment at intersections ("T' intersections), circie drives, cul-
de-sacs, etc
Streetscape Planting strip minimum width is six feet The planting strips should be planted and
maintained "208" requirements may result in wider planting strips
Sidewalks Six foot minimum width sidewalks should be required on at least one side when the
local access road serves as a pedestrian route to schools, parks or shopping
Street lighting Street lighting should be provided at intersections and other places as necessary
for public safety and crime prevention
The proposal is consistent with Local Access Road function, building setback moving lanes,
access conditions, traffic features, planning features and streetscape critena above The proposal
is inconsistent with nght-of-way width, width between curbs, sidewalks and street lighting criteria
above The Division of Engineering and Roads in its comments on this project wili allow the road
to be improved to County Driveway Standards with conditions This determination implies that the
anticipated daily traffic volume can be accommodated by a"driveway standard" road The
ZE-106B-72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Heanng
6
t i
proposal as conditioned with recommended conditions of approval will be consistent with the
above "daily volume" criterion
Decision Guideline 21 1 4 specifies that sidewalks shouid at a minimum be provided along all
arterial roads and all local access roads which lead to schools, parks and shopping districts
Sidewalks are not proposed The proposal is inconsistent with this decision guideline
Decision Guideline 21 5 14 specifies that prior to applying tree planting and street light policies as
conditions of approval for development and zone change requests, assure that funding and
maintenance provisions are determined and available Type III landscaping is proposed and
street lights are not proposed The proposal is partially consistent with this decision guideline
The property is also located within the Intenm Urban Growth Area (IUGA) boundary established
by County Resolution 97-0321 The Resolution encourages urban growth and development and
higher intensities of land use in the IUGA The proposal is not inconsistent with the requirements
of said Resolution
Zoning The purpose of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set standards for orderly
development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that
is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values The
minimum standards specified in Section 14 622 of the Spokane County Zoning Code, Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone are normally reviewed to determine whether a proposal in the Urban
Residential-22 Zone shouid be approved, approved with conditions or denied However, the
proposal is essentially a road improvement matter and staff analysis is limited to a review of the
proposal's consistency with the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
Staff Summarv The Change of Conditions application to modify original Division of Engineering
Condition # 10, ZE-106A-72, would aliow Woodruff Road to be developed to Spokane County
Driveway Standards instead of the currently required County Public Road Standards The
application is consistent with some of the Decision Guidelines of the County Comprehensive Plan
and inconsistent with other Decision Guidelines
Attachments
A Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Plan Map
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
B Recommended Conditions of Approval
C Agency Comments
D Division of Building and Code Enforcement Technical Information Bulletin 6-17
ZE-106B-72
Staff Report - June 13, 2001 Public Heanng
7
f x
ATTA£HNIENT A
MARS
V1CINITY N1AP
$iTE DE1fELORMENT PI.AN
COMPREHEIVSiIIE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
! t
ZE-106B-72
Vicinity Map
C T i
29 ~ O/ _ a ~ A i ucta ' ~ 9
-4ru A,,-cf~ -uu
MISSt m ~
~ I Maxwc.l
VicKarv
, M~xwell $intn nt:y
Jfi ~ Stnto S Cinn
V
'E
S W~~
¢
L-stnv
~ ~ WE ~ o Catnldo ~ ~do O 3 ~ go
y 1 ~ 1~4~IIon M on o ~
~ ~ -s fb n
^ Arthur-W,1&&m,&menrm , o >
~ Sp c~ S[MllLfield
d
Spnngfield 0 g f ~S&A
A1bL1 / r ~/8lJf~.G2..f?f~ All.~
-Alk E.
3
I ~ Q ~ Vallevw;t V-111evwny ~i
Mixon ~ ~
Nixon 15° Sp6 ane Hi a'r Fron
mjIn ,C
n ton ~ ~ RiveiNide
v > x ~ c
~ v Sule SQmPuc
Contiact ed
APPiewaY Appleway / 3'~1 o
A~ afn ~
r5th
~
; loffi.~
~ lth
11th
„7tffih
19 ~ 12
~ M ~ niv rsi Senior Hig ~ Mc~my ( 4~ * 0 14ttL Tth
, ~o od 3 ~ aa ~ al
- - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ I ~ J
17~h ~
I ~ 4 18tt, •ity / n a ~
1
I 2ikh_
5
I a
~ rb
~ys h 29 7-3rd Bo4~dish r gh
~
30
I y I
'nih
~ 28th
ca `n ~ I k ~ ~
Scale 1 inch - 1667 ft(rounciet) 02/28/01 Vaniry Map
~ l
Z E-10 6 B-72
Site Plan
EYISTWG (iiA.N LINK
fEtiCC 133D Pa15TtC
( 6 ~ 51AT5 10 rtEE7 CQI\^1'
~ uu-r un oo ~IG.17 Q15C1(QIVG
HiOCOi rIH[S ~ PRDPERTY Llh REOUIR_t7ENT
WiN . GWN uNK
I , mr v mu+ ~ FRKP W P115TiC
mrta6 m ~ wn.~ ~ ~ SLATS Fit~l" fJST
~a.r tND Of tX197 f-NGE
\ ( I SQJiIi A.diG EAST
PRAPERTT LIA£ TO
NORT.{ eID (7F
hR}ODRUfF RFG+ti
Of WAY
~
` ~ ~ ` I
NOTES
oD"Orrs srce uu-T rixruILr on ir
STEEL Aq.E 175h SU+Ro Cli -OFF GI011fT9!
~ v ♦ ' (4) ^0' Y,AIl. POLfS 0 9A'.LCYT9Ati
NALF lA/RT 1 NOR7'~1 5lDL OF PROPEK77
ADDITtPNAt PARK1hG AfnD DRIYENAI'
(~Q~ LIGHfING fWORE9LtNT STRIP lIG1T9
A.\D E][TfRlAR CUS-OPP K/SLPALKS
` A.RS mpUNTED ON CARPORYS
u tw f ~a ` ~
I ~
4 ~
GuEBT.
PqRK11Y'-
y1
11M4~ tl Zr Wu ICX11L, I
~'»ouu4c w C l T~ m ~
rsirn rm c¢e
, 7 .,4d y ~
j / 7f1 lllt PRK1aC~~~`` a, C 9 PS ( ~ ~
~ 7 •~v: ~ , ' / / / ~(1„ .zia. ro ~
~ . , . Kcaa ~rs '
Ln+=_
i I ~4 ' e i 4 - 1~ (
VIUA
i A
T o I
fOr
f ~ 1 '
/ .C / . I ~ u~otvcu~
4ewn~n110
"m'm^`~ I
.
3-0 M I K 1 • i E-rm~ `
L
.1------ - ~m SiTE PLAN
i , ,
mil ,
r I ~ OF RECORD
t ; ~ se ] I OV
~ \
~
L cAM (
wu
~ UW, ^ot ~ ~ weu I J utu~+c wwa
a ktououa ano~[r -+crss s~
E}t-h --XV E-NIJE-------------------------- ' j RECEIVED
1 SPOKANE COUN
FE6 22 2001
o ~-o' n a 5a-o' wdo
DIVISION OF PLANNING
~
~ u~ sr irria~ raaTu
P
TROti A Cf SNOfiT P.AT 99 076 AGCORWIiG TO PIAT RECARDED [N V0.Ur1£ 16 Of %4ORT PLATS PAGES GO N IM Si'OKNif C01tm MASHDIGTQI,
~ TNAT PORTDON OF SAID TRACT A OESCRtBCD AS FOLLOMf4+
6[G1N14NG AT THE 60VT11FA61 GORNER OF SAID TRACT A. TMIGL M.ONG T1E 80Ui11QtLr BOtJltDnRY Of 6At0 TRKT A T11f FW.OMtl11G t11D (2) CLI1RSt& I)
Nq0'OD'OD"W 77,00 IfCT Nf6W"1641 0 57 fEETr rmu MV WWE Dt T1 f[LT TO A fCiR(i A! T19 [ASTLRI.T U?IL Of iUD T1tACT A. fKDIC[ l07Lt7'4&Yk
.LL„pZ 9AID CASTT.it1T IPIL ! N if[T ?0 Tk[ 1'OIMi OI 6CfdM1111:
r
02/28/01 Site Plan
ZE-106B-72
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
U71 I
-riTm
J:ffi
~
-filifill
~
EIOI
~
~ rrrrrrrrTT
_A
~I
-
' ~ •
~ ~
ICtLLlLLl~~
URNLL-L.L-L~
R
I Lu
~
29
Scale 1 inch - 1667 ft (rounded) 02/28/01 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
SubJect Property within IUGA A."-n s.e.
Subject Property within UTA
- . ~ . , „
I
ZE-106B-72
Existing Zoning
'-Ua > 772 ' p- . ~ p- .
~ -222480C I Ug2292239~ 6 3155 79C
UR22 4 3 UR 2 9 9 UR J2 41 69 1
U 221 IC 6 3 24 1 20 23 3828 5C U2 1 t
69
UFi
15 B 83 ~ 2 12~ 3 36 8 B~I 37 8 ~ 's-#3fiA •
- - - - -8 444 6e- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ ~I
! 310 ~ I ~I . ~ B 3 3~ 9 57
~ ~~7y 633q957
B 3 22 67
13 18A 891
B,a 1S 59 B 3 45 86C 6 ~ 571
3
o
UR1639 ' UR-224M6
(21659 AArflewa; .
~"'~'B 3 94 85C
I 2 1~i 64 . ~ rt1R-3-$ 31 68 i -
I ~
B 8-J2 0 8 C `
1~73 C
U 2216 9 UR353168 8
68 8 - - ~
yM22 P9 72QJR (
UR 72 5s 72t
J
UR 22 44 86C x
121659
l'R 3 5 203 42
~
. . ' .
12261 '
t f ~ L U l - Y"f
' U 1 7
IR 3 16 5 ttR-3-S 16 3g
lul _ ~ ~ a UR 2218 74C ~
0 191 9
R ~41
-
U 16 g 1 - R 5 203 ~12 ~ ,
~ . ~.I I
~
I 231 41 UF 51 5 R 5 7 6g U 1 g3 I
~ Y4L alu m-~
13 70
713 0 _7 6 R 3 1176 i 1- - lAi 7 8 96C
~ R 1
~
5 8 - I UR $ 1 V6ffS R•3
1 ~
Li ~ 6 0 UR361765
~ UH.S,~ 17 65 I1R-8 ~
217 5L
thUR ~
~
Scale 1 inch - 500 ft (rounded) 02/28/01 Euisbng Zornng
r,
c
ATTACHMENT B
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 ~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
1 l APPROVAL FOR ZE-1066-72
~r
~
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOMI'sZE COUlsUY
1 Ail conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors
2 The Change in Conditions applies only to the parcel legally described in the Planning
Division proJect application file designated ZE-106B-72, Assessor's tax parcel nos
45202 9069 and 45202 9068
3 The improvement of Woodruff Road shall be consistent with Spokane County Driveway
Standards, County Division Building and Code Enforcement Bulletin B-17
4 The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shali serve as public
notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeai and shall only be
released, in fuli or in part, by the Division of Planning The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows
The parcel of property legally described as [from file No ZE-10613-72], is the subject
of a land use action heard June 13, 2001 by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on
(insert legal description), imposing a variety of special development conditions
File No ZE-106B-72 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County
Division of Planning
6. The Division of Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal
period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of
the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay
Zone) The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as
follows (insert legal description)
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY COMMENTS
SPOKANE REGiONAL HEALTH D1STRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE May 29, 2001
~
TO Jim Falk, Associate Planner, Spokane County Division of Planning
~
FROM Donaid Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT Change of Conditions to an Existing Zone Reclassification,
ZE-10613-72 (Carpenter)
Ali Health District conditions are still applicable since our last communication dated
March 15, 2001
R[7 iVF- D
t
ti t -S
~~~~~1.l, ~ . ~ ~ i~
s ~
E ~1
[.S.,f.,1 r e 1
,
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
REGc(VE D
Date March 15, 2001 SP-DKAkip NTy
Department Spokane Regional Health Districi 1;'
Uepartrnent Contact Person Steven P 1-l01 dei by, IZ S ~1 ~ LA %,(,N1 ',P` ~
Action ZE-1068-72, Change of Conditions to an existing Zone Reclassification in t}1e e\i sting
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone
TECI°iNICAL 1ZEVIEW MEETING March 15 2001 ct 2 15 P M
1\jote
The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with prunary agency commcnts to assist
the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Eaaminer The
following information does not provide a compiete or binding final review of the proposal This will
occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Flearing Agenda T11e acceptance of
the application and scheduling of the applicatton on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function
of this meettng A secondary function of this mecting is to provide a preluni nary review of the
aQplication This wil) provide a forum for tlle sponsor and other departments of what to e\pect as
standard development conditions and design recommendations
The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the
Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the inforcnation (►lot all agencies/departments
have been contacted-only those who have been determined to have nrimary interest )
1 a Does the appltcation (or can the development) meet requirements to be place on the Public
Hearing Agenda9 0 YES ~ NO
b If no, what is lacking?
c Public Hearing Schedule Hearings before tlle Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon
determination that the applicatton is complete Items will be scheduled for the first available
public hearing
2 After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of
the development9 (Attach condtttons if necessary)
See attached conditions
e
SPOh'ANE REGrONAL HEALTH DISTRICT CaNDITIONS
a Sewage dtsposal method Shall be as authaiized by the Dlrectoi of Utilities Spokane
County
b Water sertnce shall bc coordinatcci thiough t11e Director of Utilities, Spokane Count}j
c Water 5ervice shall be by an existing public «Jater supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokanc), State Departrnent of Health
d A public sewer system wtll be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized
e Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited
0
MAR-06-0 1 11 47AM FROM-SCAPCA ' 5094776826 T-051 P Ol/Ol F-366
SPOKANE COUNTY
AIR POILUTION
[JLEAR011~AIR
s P o K A Na-- CONTROt AUTHORiTY
WSST 1101 COLLbGE SUiTE 403 • SPOKANE WA 99201 •(509) 477-4727 Fax (509) 477 6828
i{ EC ElF' i-. i
Date March 6 2001 ~F~C1~fi.►~ r~n~J,~,, ~~j
To Jim Falk, Associate Planner
Spokane Countv Division of Planninq 1026 W BroadwaM Avenue DiVCS;pN Cr pLANNING
Spokane. WA 99260_0220
From Ron Edgar, Chief of Technical Services
RE SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR
File No ZE-1066-72
Proponent / Project Name ChanAe of Conditions to exisLnq zone reclass in excstinq UR-22 zone
0 Request for Comments on March 15, 2001 (a 2 15 p m
The following is a list of concerns/issues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined Trom
information received by this office The Iist is provided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not
relieve the proponent from meeting all local, state, and/or federa( regufations For additional information or
clanfication contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727 Copies of SCAPCA regulabons are availabfe for purchase in
our office or can be viewed and downloaded from http lAvww scapca orq
Construction related requirements
• Dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects must be controlfed This may require
me use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers, or suspension of activiry dur,ng certain weather conditions
• Measures must be taken to avoid the deposrtion of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved svrfaces
If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immed+ately to clean these surfaces
• Debns generated as a resuit of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning
• SCAPCA strongly recommends that alf traveled surfaces (i e ingress, egress parking areas access roads,
etc ) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions
• If objecbonabfe odors result frorn this project, effectrve control apparatus and measures must be taken to
reduce odors to a minimum
Addrtional requirements
• A Notice of Construction and Application for Approval is required to be submitted and approved by SCAPCA
pnor to the constn.iction installation, or estaelishment of an air poliution source This includes emergency
generacers rated at 500 hp (375 k111) or higher tlaturdl gas heabng equipment units rated at 4 MMBTU/hr or
h+gher (input), and heating equipment units fired with other fuels (e g diesel) rated at 1 MMBTU/hr (input) or
higher Contact SCAPCA for a Notice of Construction applicaUon
• A Noace of Intenc must be submrtted to SCAPCA prior to any demofroon praject or asbestos proJect An
asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA accredited building inspector pnor to the demolition or
renovation of bviidings to determine if asbestos-containing matenal is presenc at che siue Contact SCAPCA
for a Notice of intent application
U Wiary'sSEPA\GENPRaI COMMENTS FORM doc
Os nlou on ReUCkO PipO/
c RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
To Jim Falk (Division of Planning) MAQ 6f
CC ~
From Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date Tuesday, March 06, 2001 dIV''''cO`~~ ~~NIN5N.G
Subject ZE-01066-72 Stage Technical Review Phase
Change of conditions to chg public road to pnvate
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required Commerc+al developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to estabiish
sewer fees
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval Commerciai developments shall submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal
SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit
SS15A Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
03/14 01 I1'ED 12 04 Fah 509 4125 , SPORANE VALLEI FIRE Lr.PT PLA\'1I\'G (~]002
.
ala~ SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
• (Spokone County Fire Distrlct 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE - SPOKANE WA 99206 3676 •(509) 928 1700 • FAX (509) 892 4125
March 14, 2001
~
r~.. ~ ! t,
Jirn Faik spc
Department of Building and Planning
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 ~JJ ; \4 ` ,
~,s~
RE Change of Conditions
ZE-106 B-72
Dear Mr Falk
The Spokane Valley Fire Department will aflow the secondary access to this
development to be built to the dnveway standard We wiil require that the road maintain
25 feet of pavement ant that "no parking" signs be placed every 20 feet along both sides
of the road Also, place a sign indicating that the illegally parked car will be towed by a
towing company to be determined
Sincerely,
,evin Miller
Fire Inspector
KM/d c
Q 10epartment DatalPrevenGon UnsharedlPlatsLShortieslFellC3-14 doc
MEMORAN D U M
DATE March 14, 2001
TO Jun Falk, Division of Planning 0N:NNb'°1cJ JQ i~'n;~IAIC
FROM John Hohman, P E, a.nd Lucy Pctcrschmidt, Stormwater Utility
RE ZE-106B-72 - Changc of Conditions to an existulg Zone ` I' 114
Reclassification in thc cvsting Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone IJ N If
r!~ lY); O ci5
CC File 09 A);~.^
This zone reclassification provides for the construction of a private driveway on Woodruff Road,
a Spokane County right-of-way We have no objections to placing this pianning action on the
Pubiic Hearing Agenda
In order to provide advance notice of future requirements for this project, we have included the
following comments
The future construction of the driveway and any appurtenant structures must comply with the
current edition of the Spokane County Guideiines for Stormwater Management For the
applicant's information, we have highlighted a few requirements that apply to their proposai
1 Spokane County does not own or operate a regional stormwater conveyance system
As a resu{t, the project proponent is responsibie for providing on-site control of
stormwater runoff from newly constructed impervious surfaces According to the SEPA
Environmental Checklist submitted by the applicant, runoff from this driveway will be
directed to the on-site stormwater management system, the applicant shall ensure that
proper conveyance is provided and verify that the stormwater management facilities
have adequate capacity to receive the runoff from the driveway
2 Drainage shall not be diverted and/or released to a downstream property at points not
receiving drainage prior to the proposed development
3 This proposal is located within the Spokane-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Sens+tive Area
(ASA) In order to mitigate the potential for groundwater degradation, a11 iand
developed within the ASA shall treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge to a dryweil or
other approved disposal point The preferred method of treatment is through a bio-
infiltration swale (formerly referred to as a"208" swale or a grassed percolation area)
According to the SEPA Environmentai Checklist submitted by the applicant, stormwater
runoff from this driveway wiil be treated using a"208" disposai system, the applicant
shall ensure that runoff from this driveway is treated appropriately
4 Easements andJor separate tracts shall be provided for all drainage faalities (natural
channels, bio-infiltration swales, storm pipes and ditches, etc ) located outside of
County right-of-way These easements andior tracts shall be identified on the Final Plat
and any subsequent construction plans
Thank you for the opportunity to comment
G 1StormlDesign Rev(ew Comments1ze108B 72 doc
,
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
sm-*~ ckx'°m "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO Spokane County Buiiding and Planning Departmenfi
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads S, vf
DATE May 30, 2001 ~
PROJECT UR-22 REVISION OF ENG COND #10
1" rC E
FILE # ZE-0106-B (11`/
,~~F rk;u~~tTV
Technical/Review Date (03/15I2001 @ 2 15)
Pianner JIM FALK
Hearing Date 06/1312001 @ 10 30 A Df1fIS1C1~ 0t~ ~~~~NIN«N(a
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant BRYAN WESTBY
Section Township Range 20-25-44
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 The applticant is requesting a Change of Condition to County Engineering Condition No 10 for
ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72, for the purposes of constructing a paved driveway in the Woodruff
Road Right-of-Way in lieu of construction of a pubiic road The Spokane County Engineer
recommends that County Engineering condition No 10 be amended to read as follows
The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Woodruff Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of
approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed
Note In Iieu of the above stated road improvements, the County Engineer will allow for the
location of a paved dnveway with one connection point to the multi-family units The applicant
shall submit drainage plans for the driveway to be reviewed and accepted by the County Engineer
prior to construction Spokane County will not maintain the driveway, therefore, the applicant
shaii sign and record a"Spokane County Notice to the Public No 4" which allows for the
construction and maintenance of a driveway in the public right-of-way Any additional access to
the Woodruff Road Right-of-Way is prohibited until such time as authorized by the County
Engineer
CC Applicant BRYAN WESTBY
Engineer/Surveyor
f'lanner JIM FALK
Page 2
Hearing / Reviek / 03/15/2001 TR
2F-OJ06-B
2 The Spokane County Engineer recommends that County Engineering condition No 13 be
amended to read as follows
Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal
3"The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities ""The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work "
END
ATTACHMENT D
DMSION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION BULLETIN B-17
. •
~ . . _ i 7 y•~/.ir ' . . • ~T-.~IIi . . _ ..t.
~Te~iruCal Iriform~tlOri'
r • f ~ r
~
i
i1 -i . .,l l~►• - T,'~ ~ } T ~
-
. . t',.~ J .~•1:_ '
` -j,v+¢ `~y 1-•1,- ' / -
,if : ~ ♦:-3~x1'fl4
, S• j • Y ' I - '1!
17
S ~~11 \1lJl~i~~, r t . _ . . ~ ~
Division of Building and Codc Enforcemenc '
Private Driveway Standards
Pursuant to Secrion 3.05.050(a)2(ii), Fire Apparatus Access, of Tide 3 of the Spokane County Code, Private
Drivcways are acccss roads that serve no more than two parcels. They shall be constructed in substantial con-
formance with the following standards as developed and recommended by the Spokane County Fire Prevention
Committee.
c ~
4 D" TURNOUT 400' '
PUBLIC BASED ON UNE OF SRE 10' 501 10'
ROAD 4W ~ ~ o 150'
DWEWNa
"FUMMFR NEAD"
OA
1.
~12' /1U,WEATHER &URFACE z
50' M1N. aADlUS
~ CtJL•DE-SAC i ,
y' ~
(NOT TO SCALE) '
■ Max. Grade: 120/-14% maximum (outsfde right-of-way) 2-8% within right-of-way - contact County Engineer's Office.
■ Width: 12' clear travelway with all-weather surface.
■ Turnouts: One approximately every 400 feet. All-weather surface 20' in total width for 50' in length.
■ Tumaround: Required for driveways over 150' in length. Needs to be within 150' of dwelling "Hammefiead" or 50'
minimum radius cul-de-sac.
■ Permits: Approach peRnit shall be required from the County Engineers office to connect
to any courrty public raad. SAMPLE
■ Inspections: Installation inspection and acxeptance of the driveway is required prior to HAMMERHEAD
dwelling occupancy (i.e., road surfacing, width, vertical clearanoe and drainage). 12•
■ Curves: No curve radius shall be less than 100' measured from the road centerline
unless approved by the fire district and the Division of Building and Planning. -A
■ Drainage: Corrugated metal pipe (CMP) or approved altemate: Driveway cross pipes
at approaches to the Fire Apparatus Access Roads, public or private, shall 50' 9
be a minimum of 12" in diameter.
■ Maintenance: A recorded road maintenance agreement with financial provisions y
is recommended and shall state that Spokane County is not responsible
to build, improve, maintain, survey, construct, repair, provide drainage or
snow removal on any private driveway. ~ 50'
For more information or an appc)inuncnt contact:
Spokane County Division of Building anti Code Enforcement
Pcrmit Centcr - 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0050
(509) 477-3675
SPOKMif GWNTr PRtNT1rK, tEPT iBi'i 0200
t , ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
J~~ s~~c~•c~~ "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO Spokane County Building and Planning Department
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE May 30, 2001 ~
PROJECT UR-22 REVISION OF ENG COND #10
FILE # ZE-0106-B
Tech n ical/Review Date (03/15/2001 @ 2 15)
Planner JIM FALK
Hearing Date 06/13/2001 @ 10 30 A
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant BRYAN WESTBY
Section Township Range 20-25-44
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 The applicant is requesting a Change of Condition to County Engineering Condition No 10 for
ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72, for the purposes of constructing a paved driveway in the Woodruff
Road Right-of-Way in lieu of construction of a public road The Spokane County Engineer
recommends that County Engineering condition No 10 be amended to read as follows
The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Woodruff Road, which is adJacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of
approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed
Note In lieu of the above stated road improvements, the County Engineer will allow for the
location of a paved driveway with one connection point to the multi-family units The applicant
shall submit drainage plans for the driveway to be reviewed and accepted by the County Engineer
prior to construction Spokane County will not maintain the driveway, therefore, the applicant
shall sign and record a"Spokane County Notice to the Public No 4" which allows for the
construction and maintenance of a driveway in the public right-of-way Any additional access to
the Woodruff Road Right-of-Way is prohibited until such time as authorized by the County
Engineer
CC Applicant BRYPN 4JESTBY
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner JIM rALK
Page 2 ua:~ring / Revzew / 03/15/2001 TR
ZE-Oa06-B
2 The Spokane County Engineer recommends that County Engineering condition No 13 be
amended to read as follows
Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal
3"The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities ""The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work "
END
/
, RECE VED
MAY 17 2001
,
SPOKANE COUM'Y ENGINEER
S P O K A N E ~e ~ p C O U IV T Y
DNfSION OF PLANNINC A DiVIS10N OI" THL PUBLIC WORKS UCI'AKTMENT
N1lCMACL V NEEDHANt DIRI'CTOh CAKI 013Fl2C DIRCCTUR
MEMORANDUM
TO Spokanc Couiity D►vi'Mcffl uf 1Jnginuc.ting_& Roads,_Scoil,Engclha7d,-c/o-Saiid~, t_ a
_ I~~i,~nba~l4~ ~ 4
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve IIolderby
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
Fire Districfi No 1
Modern Electric and Water Company
Spokane County Water District No 3
FROM Jim Falk, Associate Planner C
.
DATE May 17, 2001
SUBJECT Review and comments for the hearing of June 13, 2001 at 10 30 a m
FILE NO ZE-106B-72
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Change of Conditions to allow for lmprovement of
Woodruff Road to County private driveway standards rather than the Public
Road Standards, per Engineers Condrtion # 10 of the original rezone
PARCEL NO 45202 9069
APPLICANT Bryan Westby for `Voodruff Hcights Limited Partnership
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency
Please review and return any comments to cne by May 30, 2001
wc
Attachments Notice of Public Heaiing
1026 W BROAUWAl • SI'OKANE WASHINC fON 99260 0220
I'f I(1N( (%9) 177 7200 • i-A\ (F09) 477 2241 •I I)l) (1109) 477 7 1zz
i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC kiEAR1NG
SPOKANE COUNTI' HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREl3Y NOTiFIED THAT A PCJl3LIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE AYPLICATION L1STED BELOW, AS FOLLaWS
Application File No ZE-10613-72, Change of Conditions to an approved zone reclassification (ZE-106-
72) requesting the ievision of Division of Engineering Condition 410 to allow improvement of Woodruff
Road to County private driveway standards whereas Condition # 10 currently requires improvement of
Woodruff Road to County public road standards
Parcel No(s) 45202 9069 and 9068
Hearing Date and Time rune 13, 2001 at 10 30 a m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Owner. Woodruff Heights Limited Partnership, Frank Carpentei, 525 E Mission AvEnue, Spokane, WA
99202, 509/484-6733
Cnntact Person Bryan Westby, Adams and Clark, 1720 W 4"' Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202, 509/747-
4600
Address and Location Generally located at the noithwest conier of the intersection of 6`h Avenue and
Woodruff Road in the NW '/4 of Section 20, Township 25 N, lZange 44 EWM, Spokane Couniy, WA
Comprehensive Plan Urban (U)
Existing Zoning Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
Eovironmental Determination A Determination of Nonsignlficance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on May 25, 2001 The comment period ends June 11, 2001
Related Pcrmits
llivision of Planning Staff Jim Falk, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7200
HEAI2ING EXAMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolutlon No 96-0294 All interested pei sons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing The Hearing Examiner may lamlt
the time given to speakers A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons
with physical disabilities
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing The Staff Report and application file nlay be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays Copies
og documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200 Send written comments to the Spokane County
Dtvision of Planning, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn Jim Falk, File No ZE-106B-72
Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Heanng Examiner, 3`d Floor,
Public Works Buildmg, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, VVA 99260-0245
` RECE-VED
DETERMINATION OF MAY 25 2001
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) SPOKAAIE CpUNTY ENGINF.ER
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBEIt ZE-106B-72
DLSCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Change of Condrtions to an appioved zone reclassification (ZE-106-
72) requesting the tevision of Division of Engineering Condition #10 to allow improvement of Woodruff
Road to County private driveway standards whereas Condition # 10 currently requires improvement of
Woodruff Road to County public road standards
PARCEL NO 45202 9069, 9068
HE, AI2ING DATE AND TIME June 13, 2001 @ 10 30 am
OWNER Woodruff Heights Limited Partnership, c/o Frank Carpenter, 525 E Mission Avenue,
Spokaile, WA 99202, 509/484-6733
PRO,rECT CONTACT Bryan Westby, Adams & Clark, 1720 W 4tih, Spokane, WA 99204, 509/747-
4600
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally locateci at rhe northwest corner of 6t1l Avenue and Woodruff
Road in the N`V '/4 of Section 20, Township 25 N, Railge 44 EWM, Spokane Countiy, Washington
LEAD AGENCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION The lead agency for this proposal llas determined that it does aot have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available
to the public on request
This DNS is tssued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lcad agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regardiog this DNS must be submitted no later
than 5 00 p m, June 11, 2001, if they are intended to alter the DNS All comments should be sent
to the contact person listed below
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL By Jim Falk, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 9926 0220 (509L477-7225
.
DATE ISSUED May 25, 2001 SIGNATURE
- S -
COMMIIVlS REGARDING IINVIROTIMENTAL CONCERN WELCOME AT THF, F[EARIlNG
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY
DIVISION OF PLANNING, lst Floor, 1026 W Broadway, Spol.ane, WA 99260 Thc appeal deadltne is ten (10)
~ calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the proJect This appeal must be written and
the appellant sllould be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Division of Planning to assist you
with the specifics for a SFPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
l WA State De artmerLt of Ecologv (Olympia)
2,fi;p~k~cll1~(.~~.Ullll y D]Vl~lU71 C~~ ~gi~nc,~ru~b i~•a spo ~~lon~Lsn~m~etmg, Scott Lngell~a-A;U,
3 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services, John Hohman
4 Spokane County Division of Utilrties, Jim Red
5 Spol.ane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
6 Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
7 Spokane County Division of Bwlding and Code Enforcement, Jeff rorry
8 Spokane County Fire Protection Dtstrict No 1
9 Modern Eleclric Water District
10 Spokane County Water District No 3
,
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO Spokane County Building and Planning Department
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE March 15, 2001
PROJECT UR-22 REVISION OF ENG COND #10
FILE # ZE-0106-B/ )
Technical/Review Date (03/15/2001 @ 2 15)
Planner JIM FALK
Hearing Date @
Review Date
Sponsor/Appiicant BRYAN WESTBY
Section Township Range 20-25-44
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 The applicant is requesting a Change of Condition to County Engineering Condition No 10 for
ZE-59A-72/ZE-106A-72, for the purposes of constructing a paved driveway in the Woodruff
Road Right-of-Way in lieu of construction of a public road The Spokane County Engineer
recommends that County Engineering condition No 10 be amended to read as follows
The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Woodruff Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of
approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed
Note In lieu of the above stated road improvements, the County Engineer will aliow for the
location of a paved driveway with one connection point to the multi-family units The applicant
shall submit drainage pians for the driveway to be reviewed and accepted by the County
Engineer prior to construction Spokane County will not maintain the driveway, therefore, the
applicant shall sign and record a"Spokane County Notice to the Pubiic No 4" which allows for
the construction and maintenance of a driveway in the public right-of-way Any additional
access to the Woodruff Road Right-of-Way is prohibited until such time as authorized by the
County Engineer
2 The Spokane County Engineer recommends that County Engineering condition No 13 be
amended to read as follows
CC Applicant BYYAN WESTBY
Engineer/Surveyor
Plannez JII9 EALK
~
~ .
Page 2
Heara.ng / RevieiJ / 03/15/2001 Tn
ZE-0106-B
Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
END
l
Kimball, Sandy
From Hemmings, Bill
Sent Friday, March 02, 2001 8 35 AM
To Falk, Jim
Cc Engelhard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda, Baldwin, Greg, Hohman, John,
Little, Colleen
Subject ZE-106B-72 - Frank Carpenter
3-2-01
My comment on this proposed change of condition wuold be that if a change is allowed, any change would still have to
meet current road and drainage standards
Bill Hemmings, PE
i
l1JY-1 -Ul 61LL 1L u-i rya ov.► v.,- zy~.. - - - - _
.
SPOKANE VALLEY FtRE DEPARTMENT
~ • ' Spokone County Fire Distrlcfi l
~
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AvE • SPOKANE WA 99206 3676 •(509) 928 1700 • FAX (509) 892 4125
March 14, 2001
i
Jim Falk
Department of Building and Planning ; R1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Change of Conditions
ZE-106 B-72
Dear Mr Falk
The Spokane Valley Fire Deparcment will allow the secondary access to this
~ development to be built to the dnveway standard We wiil require that the road maintain
25 feet of pavement ant that "no parking" signs be placed every 20 feet along both sides
of the road Also, place a sign indicating that the illegally parked car wi11 be tovbed by a
towing company to be determined
Sincerely,
I
,
i evin MiIler
,
Fire Inspector
KM/dc
i
0 1Department DatalPreveniion UnsharedlPlats\.ShortieslFelk3-14 doc
r • ~ ~
~
ff( ; t
I
S
S l> Q K A N 1-=7 C O U N T Y
DNISION OF PI.AtVNWC A DIVISION OF THC PUlil !C I'VO12F.S DI PARTMEM
MICHACL V NECDHAM, 171R1'CIOR GAKl OI3kKC, DIRFCi'UR
MEMQRANDUM
DATE March 1, 2001
1'O -~t qlc► t" 11~~,.i n-and- =11<~t an~ &n<~ -,~G tt a i cl, ,
ion of Engineering and Roads- Development Services, Bill Hemmings
Division of Utilities - lnformation Management, Jim Red
Division of Utilrties - Stormwatcr Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spol.ane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studcr
Central Valley School District No 356
Spol.ane County Fire District No 1
Modern Electric and Water Company
Spokane County Water District No 3
WA State Boundary Review Board, Susan Wincllell
FRON1 Jim Falk, Associate Alanner .
SUBJECT ZE-106B-72, Change of Conditions to an existing Zone Reclassification in the
existing Urban Resiciential-22 (UR-22) Zone
The applicant is requesting Revision of Condrtion 10 to allow for improvcment of Woodruff
Road to County private driveway standards Condrtion 10 currently requires improvement of
VVoodruff Road to County Public Road Standards
TECIF]INICAL REVTEW MEETING
1VIARCH 15, 2001 at 2 15 P M
llivision Of Plannjng lst Floor Conference Room lA
Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FOIZM
for your comments The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting The
sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting If you cannot attend,
please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me for the
meeting The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting
and included in the Division of Planning file Thanl.s for your cooperation If you have any
questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7200
NOTE The Drvision of Planning will now be circulating comments for SFPA Checklist at
ttie time of technical review This will be the oizly time you will be able to
comment regarding the SEPA Check]ist for this project
wc
Copy without enclosures
Franl. Carpenter, Waodruff Heights Limited I'artnership, 525 F Mission, Spokane, WA
99202
Bryan Westby, Adams & Clark, 1720 W 4tfl, Spokane, WA 99204
Attachments Technical Keview Fonn, Pioject Appiication, Site 1'lan Vicinity Map, SEPA
Checklist
1026 W 131tOADtNA1 • SPUhANC WASHINGTON 99260 0220
PwONIr (509) 477-7200 • FA\ (509) 477 2243 • 1 DD (509) 477 7133
!
. `
Spokane County
Division of Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time March 15, 2001 @ 2 15 p m
Project File No ZE-106B-72
Project Location Generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
6"' Avenue and Woodruff Road in the NW '/4 of Section 20, Township 25 N,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA
Comprehensive Plan Urban (t)
Project Description Change of Conditions to an existing Zone Reclassification in
the existing Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone
Parcel No(s) 45202 9069
Owner Frank Carpenter
Woodruff Heights Limited Partnershlp
525 E Mission Avenue
Spokane, WA 99202
5091484-6733
Proj ect Bryan Westby
Contact Adams & Clark
720 W 4"l Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204
509\747-4600
Project Planner Jim Falk
w
U REcEivED
SPOKANE COUNTY
F E B 22 2001
D„ri~~~~ ~~NNiNG
C H EC:K^Li:-S
SPOKANE ENVIRONNiENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230-1^
.
~ ~
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11 10 230(1)
PURPOSE OF CNECKLIST
1 he State Env1ronmenLal I'olicy Act (SEPA), chapter 43) 21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to conslder the environmencal impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental
impact statemenc (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals ivith probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environmenr The purpose of this checklist is to provide iriformation to help you
and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacu from che proposal,
if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
LVSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICAIVTS
This envlronmental checkhst asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal
Governmental agencies use this checklist to deterrrune whether the environmental unpacts or your
proposal are sigruficant, requinrig preparacion of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, wlth the mosz
precise informaLion known, or give the best descnption you can
You must answer each quesLion accurately and carefully, to the besL of your knowledge In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does noti apply" Corr.plcte answers to the questions
now may avoid unnecessary delays later
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning,, shoreline, and landmark
designations Answer these question if you can If you have problems, thP governmencal agencies can
assist you
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period
of ume or on d.ifferent parcels of Iand Attach any addiuonal information that will help descnbe your
proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you subrrut this checklist may ask you to
eYplain your answers or provide additional information reasonably relaced to deterrniz.ng if there may
be significant ad,,erse impact
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NOrV-PR0,IECT PROPOSALS
Complete this checklist for non-proJect proposals, even though questions inay be ansn,ered "does not
apply " N ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEy1ENTAL Sf-EET FOR NOV-PROJECT ACTIO\S (pan D)
For non-project acuons, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "apphcant," and
"property or site" should be read as "propos1l,' "proposer," and "aftecced geographic area "
respectively
Spotiane.En iro }n, encal Urdinance Checklist Pase 2 of 21
I a
A BACKGROUND FILE/PROJECT No
1 Name of proposed project, if applicable
WoodruffHerghts Apartments-Change of Condctcons (Request for Driveway on Publcc Rcght of Way)
2 Name of applicant
Woodru. fj`'Heaghts Limited Partnership
Spokane Housing Ventures, General Manager
3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person
525 E Mission
Spokane WA 99202-1824
(509) 484-6733
Frank Carpenter
4 Date checklist prepared
January 25, 2001
5 Agency requesting checklist
Spokane County Division of Planning
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
July- August 2001
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 3 of 21
~
\
A BACKGROUND (continued)
7 a Do you have any plans for future additlons, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
thls proposal? If yes, explain
No
b Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain
Yes, we are the general manager for owri Hidden Ptnes Apartments 9817 E 6'h, whzch adjorns Woodruff
Heights to the north, and Village Apartments 9717 E 6`j', which adjocns Woodruff Heights to the West
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal
Leppo Consultants Irrc (LCI) prepared A Lrmrled Environmental Site Assessment- Village Apartments (New
Site), Woodruff and 6tli Avenue, Spokar:e, Wasltington In .Iuly 1998 The or:grnal Village Apartments (New Srte)
consrsted of approxcmately S 3 acres In .Tune 1999 LCI completed a report for the western portaon of the origcnal
Village Apart»zents (New Scte), which is immedaately to the west of the Subject site The prior envlronmental study
for the western adJacentproperty was titled Update Lcmtted Envtronmental Site Assessment- Vcllage Apartmef:ts
Property, West Parce4 Woodru, f~f'Road and 6"` Avenue In January 2000,LC1 completed an Update Lcmited
Environmental Site Assessment on the subJect property These reports are avatlable upon request
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain
None
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known
Approval of Chunge of Cortdctrons
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 4 of 21
A BACKGROUND (continued)
11 Give a bnef, complete descnption of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and srte There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects
of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page
We are requesting the approval of a Change of Condations to Spokane County Case No ZE 59A-72/ZE-106A-72 to
place a dnveway, wtth tmprovements to driveway standards upon the current Woodruff Road, a Spokane County
Rtght of Way Thts proposal will provade an alternahve method of accessang 6`hAvenue for tenants of both
Woodruff Hetghts and Hcdden Pines apartments This driveway wall also improve emergency access to these
apartments
12 Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of
your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known If a
proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundanes of the site(s) Provide a legal
descnpnon, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted wlth any permit application related to this checklist
WoodrufJ'Heights Apartrnents rs located in the NW %4 of Sectcon 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 E'ast, W M, just
to the North and East of thejuncture of Woodruff Road and 6`" Avenue rn the Spokane valley area The Subject Scte
is comprzsed of the Short Plat Tract, occupying approximately 121 acres in the southeast portcon of the orcginal
Village Apartments property
Tract "B" of Short Plat SP-121699
13 Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area?
The Pnonty Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas
for boundanes)
Yes, the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area and both the General and the Pnonty
Sewer Service Area
Spokane Envuonmental Ordinance Checklist 5 of 21
4
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 EARTH
a General descnption of the site (circle one) - Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
Woodruff Hecghts project is flat with minirnal slope
b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
7% Most of the site is 2-5%
c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you
know the classification of agncultural soils, specify them and note any pnme farmland
Marble Sandy loam
d Axe there surface indications or history of unstable soils m the immediate viciruty? If so, descnbe
No surface andicataons
e Descnbe the purpose, type and approximate quantihes of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source
of fill
Earlhwork will be requcred for di avewuy coirstruclion No tmported fill is atatacipated
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally descnbe
Rask af eros1on is slight, but a mancmal amount could occur durtng drtvetivay construction The corttractor wcll be
required to uttlize best management practices for the mclrgataon of both wand borne and surface drainage erostorz
during drtveway constructcon
Spokane Envuonmental Ordinance Checklist 6 of 21
. , ,
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
g About what percent of the srte will be covered wrth impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
The proposed draveway wtll be paved Approxirnately SO% of the exrsting sate (apartment complex) is covered by
impervious surfaces
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any
Earth surfaces exposed by constructaon will be eather covered by buaZdangs or pavang, or will be restored by
landscaping
2 AIR
a What type of emissions to the au would result from the proposal (i e, dust, automobile, odors, industnal,
wood smoke) dunng construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally descnbe and give
approximate quantities, if known
Constructzon phase dust and emassion frorn construction equipment Completion emissions from autvmobiles
The proposed driveway is to be paved
b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
descnbe
No
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any
Compltance with existcng local codes atitl regulatrons
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 7 of 21
. ~
Evaluahon For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
3 Water
a Surface
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate viciruty of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, descnbe type and provide names If
appropnate, state what stream or nver it flows into
No
2) Will the project requue any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the descnbed waters? If yes,
please descnbe and attach available plans
No
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge matenal that would be placed in or removed from surface water or
wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill matenal
N/A
4) Will the proposal require surface water wifihdrawals or diversions? Give a general descnption, purpose,
and approximate quantities if known
Storm-water i unoff wrll be drscharged to ground afzd grouncl water, whach may underlce the scte
5) Does the proposal lie within a 10-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 8 of 21
J No
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste matenals to surface waters? If so, descnbe the type of
waste and anticipated volume of discharge
No
b Ground
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general descnption,
purpose, and approxunate quantities if known
No The driveway runoff will be dtrected to the on-sate stormwater management system
2) Descnbe waste matenal that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste
treatment facility Descnbe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the
number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve
N/A the scte is sewered
3) Descnbe any Systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the
purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including Systems such as those for the disposal
of storm water or drainage from floor dratns) Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be
disposed of through the system and the types of matenals likely to be disposed of (including matenals
which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities)
None
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 9 of 21
l
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above-ground or
underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of matenals will be stored9
No
5} What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on
site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of
disposal Systems descnbed in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
This is a request for a change of conditions for a driveway with no storage facrlity involved Complrance with
existang codes and regulataons wtll be maintaaned
c Water Runoff (including storm water)
1) Descnbe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters9 If so,
descnbe
Storm-water runoff from the driveway wcll be collected and disposed of in accordance wath adopted "208" storm-
water dasposal regulations
2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to
surface or groundwater or to a storm water dlsposal system discharging to surface or groundwater9
No
3) Could waste matenals enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally descnbe
Illegully disposed waste rnaterials and waste involved wtth auto iraffic could errter ground wuter throtigh storm-
water dlsposal facilzties
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 10 of 21
J i Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B EN'VIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed
action lies within the AQUifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities
concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist)
Compliance wcth adopted "208" regulations Sanctary sewer wastes will be collected to Counry of Spokane publac
system
4 PLANTS
a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site
deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
~X shrubs ~rass~ pasture crop or gram
wet soil plants catta.il, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
(Thcs site as fully developed as a multi family project with required landscaping, pavang and lighhng completed)
b What lcind and amount of vegetahon unll be removed or altered?
The small amount of grass, which exists in draveway area, will be removed
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
None
d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any
The landscapang plan for this site has already been approved and implemented
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 11 of 21
. ~
Evaluation For
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued) Agency Use Only
5 ANIMALS
a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the Site
birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, bther I Rodents
fish bass, salmon, trout, hemng, shellfish, other
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
None
C Is the site part of a rnigration route9 If so, explain
No
d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
None
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a What kinds of energy (electnc, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs9 Descnbe whether it will be used for heating, manufactunng, etc
IV/A the draveway ltas no energy needs
b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties9 If so, generally
descnbe
No
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 12 of 21
/ 1 >
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
C What lcinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal9 List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any
N/A for driveway
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chenucals, nsk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, descnbe
No
1) Descnbe special emergency services that might be required
No special ernergency servaces
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any
Compliance wath locally adopted codes and regulations
b Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example
traffic, equipment, operarion, other)9
Truffic Noise
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a
long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)9 Indicate what hours noise would
come from the site
As stated previously, this Change of Conditions is to amend the conditions of a previous land use action This
Spokane Environmental Ordmance Checklist 13 of 21
~
request is to grant permission to construct a pnvate dnveway upon a Spokane County Right of Way The only
noise caused by the project would be short term, normal construchon noise dunng construction of the access dnve
way which would take place dunng day light hours and be minimal
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any
None
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Drcveway cs on vacant land Adjacent ts WoodruffHerghts Apartments and vacant land
b Has the site been used for agnculture? If so, descnbe
No, Not to our knowledge
c Descnbe any structures on the site
There are no structures located wathin the Woodruff Right of Way
d Will any structures be demolished? If so, which?
No
e What is the current zoning classification of the site?
UR 22 at Woodruff Heights Apartments Drcveway site ts on County nght of way
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 14 of 21
i
~ Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
f What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site?
Urban
g If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h Has any part of the site been classified as an -environmentally sensitive- area? If so, specify
No
i Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
1V/A None on drtveway site
J Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any
N/A
1 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and proJected land uses and plans, if
any
Spokane Environmental Orduiance Checklist 15 of 21
. ~
Cornplcance with local codes and reguirernents
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
9 HOUSING
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing
N/A No houstng untts on draveway
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eluninated9 Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing
N/A
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any
N/A
10 AESTHETICS
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas, what is the pnncipal
extenor building matenal(s) proposed?
N/A No structure will be on dreveway
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Mone
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any
None
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 16 of 21
\
i , Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None
b Could light or glare from the firushed project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any
None
12 RECREATION
a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
A joint tenant park foi Village, Woodr-uff and Hidden Pcnes cs becng constructed on the northeast portcon of the
Htdden Pcnes site Two tot lots are also available cn village and Woodruff
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, descnbe
No
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 17 of 21
. , ~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any
N/A No ampact on recreation will be created by the driveway
13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers,
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descnbe
No
b Generally descnbe any landmaxks or evidence of histonc, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site
1Vone
C Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any
None
14 TRANSPORTATION
a Identify public streets and highways serving the Site and descnbe proposed access to the existing street
system Show on sitc plans, if any
G`'' Avenue serves the Woodruff Apurlnients The dreve way would allow darect uccess orl to Woodruff Road
b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop9
No Nearest nublec transet site rs approximately mcle from project at Appleway and Farr Rd
Spokane Environmental Orduiance Checklist 18 of 21
\
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
N/A for drtveway
d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally descnbe (indicate whether public or pnvate)
The creation of a private drive on the current Woodruff Road right of way is the purpose of thas application
e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o fl water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally descnbe
No
f How many vehicular tnps per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur
1Vo additaonal vehacular trips would likely be generated by the cornpletiori of this drtveway Traffic on the driveway
would reduce the traffic on the current 6`h Ave access for both TVoodruff and Hadden Pznes
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any
None
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example
fire protectlon, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally descnbe
No
Spokane Envuonmental Ordunance CheckLst 19 of 21
~
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe
No
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any
N/A
16 UTILITYES
a Circle utilities currently available at the srte klectncity, natural izas, water, refuse servlce, telephone)
Isarutarv seweii, septic system, other
b Descnbe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activitles on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed
N/A for driveway
C SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made trutllfully and to the
best of my knowledge I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of
full disclosure on my part, the ggencY may withdraw any determination of non-significance that it might issue in
reliance upon thxs checklist
~
Date Januarv 25, 2001
Proponent Javne Auld Proponent
_
(Please type or print) (Signa 4~t
Address East 525 Mission Avenue City, State, Zip Spokane, WA, 99202-1824
Phone (509) 484-6733
Spokane Envtironmental Ordinance Checklist 20 of 21
.
v
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff
A Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a
determination of nonsignificance (DNS)
B Concludes that probable significant adverse environ,mental impacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with condrtions
(MDNS)
C Concludes that there are probable sigruficant adverse environmental impacts and recommends
a determination of significance (DS)
REFER TO FEE S CHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist 21 of 21
' 02/15/2001 21 27 FAi 003
.
. , .
ATTACHMENT TO.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLASJNING
CHANGrE OF CONDY7'IONS FpR A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONE CHANGE
A change of the following Condition Number Ten (10) of the Conditions of Approval of ~
Case Number ZE 59A-72/ZE-106A-72 The aforementioned condirion states "The County <
Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Qne, Local Access Standard, for
the unprovcmcnt of Woodruff Road," whuch is adj acent to the proposod development This
wi11 require the adcbtion of approxunatcly 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage af the
development Thc construction of cwbmg and sidewallc is also requu-ed
1
~
~
i
i
~
,
~
~
~
i
~
i
i
~ i
' 02i1512001 21 27 FAs Q02
- sPoa -M- corr.NTY pLANN G
CELA,NGE OF CONDITIONS FQR A t. ~
PRE'VIOUSLY APPROVED ZONE CHANGE
Date Februar,y 15, 2001 ApphcAbon No ~h=, - ~0604;L
Name Of Applticantlltepresentative Woodruff Heiohts limited Partnership
Mailing Address 525 E. M1 S51 AI1 Ai/a _
Gty Spokane $tate WA Zlp 49242-1824
Phone (509) 484-6733 (Work) (Home)
Ejusting Zonc Classif'icaUon. UR-22
Date Emstuig Zone Class►ficauon EstabLshed Jan 1, 1991
Legal Descnption of Properry a pDrti On of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
Secuon ZO Townslug 25 North Racige 44 Easr
Soum,e of n!t9
Parcel No PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
Reference specific "Condiuon(s)" of ongunal approval (Cite the appLcable condiuon from
the Fuidings and Order of the Hearing Examaner Comnuttee's pubhc heanug)
See attachment
Givc dctailed explanation of request for change in status of the proposal
Request is for the approval of a Change af Conditions to Case No
ZE 59A-72/ZE-106A-72 for the installation of a private driveway upon
the current Woodruff Road (Sookane County_) rycht-of-way
If devclopment of die site ill clianged substanuslly by this request, ar the property has
boundanes different th ongmal proposed, a revised developmeat plan must be stibmitted
'
/
Sig~anue licant or Agent Address if different thaa Appl,eaztt
\.J
r- (A
~
RECE41/ED
sPOKANE couM
Rev 8/93, sam . ,
. F ~ ,
' FEB 22 2001
DIVISION OF P{.J11MNING
~
, l ~ i
S f CJ f< N O U N "I- Y
U1VI5tON Ofz ENGINi:GR1NG ANU ROADS /1 UlViStON Ot: TlIE !'UIII.IC WOItKS UkI'AK'fA11.NT
Wittiam A. Johns, !'.F., County L•ngtnecr
AGREEI'vIrNT TO PAY rEES
LNGINI,LIt'S AGItIs'I:ML'N'f NUNII3ER _ 7 " ZL" 7" ~ 7a2
This abrcemctit betweeil Spokane Councy and SDo cane HousinQ Ventures ~rsnn1
wliosc iiiterest iii the nroject is General Manager ,
-ki:C°"tit['TTlT. 6+~.)
is eiitered into this 24th day of January ~ 19 2001,This asreement is applicable to tlle project
4:iiowii as: Woodruff Ilei ts 9815 E. bth Ave. Sookane 4A •
~rJltzr~tarUsrur-ntcm.~mc'~tl ~
That tlle inclividuais and parties nailled liereiii as hauins an interest in the above described Property or rroject agree
to the fotlowins:
1. Reiiiiburse Spokane County for project rev:ew and iiispection fees as specifiec] in Cliapter 9.14 ot
the Spol:aae Cvunty Code. Tlie fees will t}e bnsecl on actual s7lary costs incurred by Spokane
Cou»ty for projeet reviews and / or iiispeGtioiis plus n ten pereent aclministrntive charse, ancl will
be billed rnontlily as accrued. Any billing Amounts due, including any expenses incurrecl in the
collection of nn overdue Account, must be paid rrior ro the County's acceptatice of the project Cor
filiiib. If a projec[ is npprovecl and/or riled with A balance still vwing, tlie unraid balance shall Ue
r.}'scl within 30 days of the invoiee clate.
2. The unclersigned agrees chat tliese fees are due and payaUle upon receipt of the billi►ib as speciliecl
<<bove.
3. Any invoices not paic1 within 30 days of the invoice date will be considered delinquent. It aily
outstaiidiiib balunce on the account for this projcct is not paid within 30 days of the invoice clale,
no furtlier reviews of tfle project documents will be cotltlucteci until the entire account balacice is
paicl. Aiiy balance al the accourit for this project not paicl within 65 days of lhe; invoice clate may
result in legnl nction or tlie initiation of other collection rroceclures, inclLicling referral to a
collection agency. The SPonsor will be liable for a»y and all expenses incurrecl by the Couiity for
the colleclion of overcltie accouiits.
4. The i»ontlily billing slioulcl be seiit to the nlteiitioii of:
N A Ni E: Frank Carpenter
ADDRL-SS: 525 E. Mission Ave.
C1TY, STATC: pokane, WA
ZII' CODE: 99202-1824
PI-IONE Il: 484-6733 PHONE # 2:
1=AX /l: 483-0345
1 undcrstancl t(iat failttre to pay tliese fees iiiay cesult i» clelay in complcliou or approval of the project or otlier
pnssible sanctions.
Cl If iliis fee agrecnieiit is completecl by someonc otlicr tIian tlle 5ponsor (i.e., thc project owiicr or a
principnl in tlie frm sponsoring (he proJeet), sucli as the Engineer designins the pro,ject, tliCll
written authorization froin tlie Spaisor spccilt -iIly autliorizjiib Uic Agciit to excculc tlils rce
Abrcc»>ciit is attachccJ to eliis Fec Abreemec .
SIGNA'fUltE- Dy: -
y A/ (J !
(1'ItfN•rNAME)
Itl, l'URN 1'I:1,11,011' COP1' '1'O St'0K'AN1% COUN'i'V 1;NG1Nt:f?RS
k111agrcr1'rc.►I,x 318l49
1026 \ti' ltranclmay Ave Spt►lc:utr tiYA 99: (0-U 171) (509) 477-3600 l'A.l': (509) ~17''-2243 'I'I)i): (509) 32•1-31 CG
SPOB;ANE COI:NTV "'IVISION Of $ITR.DING ANL CODE ENFOR T ~
1026 WESr BRawwAY AvslvUS • spos,uNE, WA 9926U-005Q
` (509) 477-3675 ~
C gmLM~ORMA770N FRo,Ecr1NFoRm,77oN j
SitB Address: 0 N ADDRFSS UNKNOWN AVE Prof ect Nttmber. 01001019 Ino: I Iame Date:
SPC?KANE, WA 00000 Permit Ux: ZE-59B OR ZE- 1 U6B-?2 ?
Panel Nntnber. 45202.9069 t
subdfvWnn: UTIKTIOWN Applicsnt: WOODkUFF HEIGHTS LTD P`IN
Blodc: Lot: 525 E NS3ION AVE
Zanfng: UR 2 Urban Rcsidtatial-22 SPOKANE, WA 99202-I 824 Phono: (509) 484-6733
Owner: DVOODRUFF HEIOHTS LTD PTTT Contact: Bryran Westhy(Adsms & Cladc)
Addreaa: 525 EWSSION AVE 1720 W. 4th Ave
SPaKANE, WA 99202-1824 Spokane, WA 99204-1702 Phonc: (509) 747-4600
Tnspectar: DAN HOWARD SetbAdts " Pronr I,eft; Right: Rexr:
Water Dist:
Gronp Nama 7,E-59H•72 OR
Prniect Nune: ZE-I068-72 ,
C PERWr(s) )
Zone Change Contraccor: 1.tcome
E"S ~~:~uF.Bt sso.oo ~orn+P.*rrAC. ttEv~w ~s.oo
COF CONDTTfQN~ 1E+05 S1,269.60 GTILITIE9 {OUTS]DEPSSA) S25.00
Total Pennk Fer: S1,419.60
t PAYMENI' 3UMMARY pne 1 of 1 NO'I'E4 ~
MII.LWOOD Processed By: DVRIGIiT, RAE
Prh►ted By: WEAIDEL, GL4RIA
Ion te Recelml P$vm~art ~t
2/23l01 1034 $1,419.60
Tot Fees AtnuuntPald AmonUtOwinB
51,419.60 $1,419.60 S0.00
.
-j`^ ~ t + r w
Spokane County
Public Workkys Department
Divison of Building & Code Enforeetnent
Receipt
Receipt Number. 1034 Customer Nunrber
Pro~ects
Full
r
Proteci lybr Inv Nbr j ,t` e4q4 .aTi~c~ mmg PAID Pmt
01001019 1 t1,4",60- , $1,4100 $1-A19.60 $1,419 60 Ez
Total. $1,4100 $1,419 60
1Vbscellaneous Items
Total PAID $1,419 60
~ Tender
TENDERED
T
✓ i.. f y~
{y^ ~t ` 11379 60
,0 he4kg ;12~79 4000
Total TENDERED: 1,41960
, Over f (Short) $0 00
Cl:ccnge $0 00
Notes:
?rQn Date / Ttme - 2123l019 23 51 AM
By GWendel
Logon User, gwendel
Statlorr• GWENDEL
Ovetrtde By
PP'tttted. 211310I 9.23-56AM Page 1 of 1
Parcel 45202 9069
Owner WOODRUFF HEIGHTS LTD PTN
CoOwner _
OwnerAddress 9-- -tA~
525 E MISSION AVE SPOKANE WA 99202-1824 USA I ~ ~ ~ _ '
Site Address
0 ADDRESS UNKNOWN SPOKANE
~
Legal Description ~ -
20-25-44 TR'B' OF SP 99-1216, R 0 S AUDITOR'S FILE ~4~r
#4437118, BK 16, PGS 60 &
61
~ 4th
r-
.
1 ~
~ r' - , -
1 ~ ~
° -
a 7t
I _
~ -
.
1 _ ~ . .
t
cl)
t t2.
Notice This is not a legal document Data depicted on this map is general & subJect to constant revision It is mtended
for reference use only Legal documents should be obtained from the appropnate agency
II _ . ~ ~
~
-g
I
) a.~ . .3 ~4(• - ~ - o ~ ~
~i, M.. • ~
~
d
i i ~ ` ~ , 1
Y ~
~
a ~ ~h
~
F
y ,
~
r-`,t
~
i ;
~ ~ 1~ I - ~ - •
~ ,
' ' _ _ _ - • ~
~ ~ -
1 _ -
' ~
t . ~ .e . M •y• 1., ' ~ .
1 i
F
~ I
a11
•e i'~t Y
♦ _ ti , ' ~ .
I .
t,
r
a ' • s•' ± F . ~
.
~
~
w~ ~ R f
`jlw
• i .
Y
`a +
't wJ.- ~ f i • ~
. . ~ ~ _ .k~.:. _ ~ • _ . . . . _
~+11
_ ~ . "N~`K~` •,l",M~~!~5 .I~w.~'il_~` , _
yMW/~' . i~~ 4
~ ~
Z , . map r ~
V'i~~n~ty g
.
3 u St~ ~ ~ ~d~
=
Q M s~ Maxw~~t~
~
^
~ ' 1/1d
~ ~ .
Sinto "
~ iuu-
met s 80
, ~ S y ' ~ N► °n ~
p ~ ~d
do S 1
~ ~g A
r g~ t' Wa ~
~
. A+ihur ~ _
S ~g6e1d 18 `n
f~ ~ V~11e'wa
17
~ N~xon ~
o t
o
Ni Contract ed
~ Sp ene Il ~
3rd
n _ `vn°'c~,n
~ • 1 1
~ O~ s~ App1ew~y
v~ u A4V~Y
1 ~
c
' x
v
Q w
~ O
'
1Uth ~ 1th
P
~ ~ . t 12th A
t rsi Senror H19 5k
1 '
a G~ o
~ 19 ood
t 3
e
.ity n
1
~ r►- tn
18th `.5
`
p _
~
jD►z m
r h
~
' o So drsh
~
a
~
29
` b ~
41
30 1 '
. /
/ ' v~a~►t'Y WP
t ~ ~ ► 02l28/oA
`r. 1 In~ ~ 1667 ft trQu~ed'!
~ .a C~,~
r
~ Oq9T1NG CiiAlN UNK
1
. uW or .en fCNf1 ADD PLAST[L
surs to neer caurm
w ~ JIarr esscuuINc
. IiID[L1 Mllh . PROP£RTT UKE RfDVIRCT1EN1'
_ ` - _ - nix . cunsu uw
FENCE W PLAfiTK
w.u
~ 8{ai'S fRDI'S fA5T
~~'1 I Ov~tO~ 6 fOD p 1P A' tAR1 a ~ ~ / M Qf m$T fEW.F,
\ ~ 9 7ma
I ~ 90UTN ALO(G EAST
PRDPERTI' UM£ TO ~ W
~WD R~
I Of WY ~D '
~ f d ~
M I
NOTES ~ w
J ~ STEEL POLE# 1 ~
.a 5}1ARP Gtrt-OFP 4l[riCTOP ~
~ _ ~ cU 2o' na+ rmES . eAsKeTBnu
KW cauRr 0 norrn+ sIvc a rROrOzrr
aeDma+w rawcIwc aNn oFUVerar
umoet ~~c++r~NC FLWRF.SGFNi STR1P LIGHT9 ~ -
K CAoTo11CTq1 ANO 9cT{R10R CUT OFF NALlPMKS ~ < '
ARE h10UMT[D dJ GIRPORTS
a a i ~ y-
c ~ J
t ~
4. b 6 p~
Jy A~
{ 1~ •\~6 ~ ~ dl umm
~ Id I
wmra GV£9i~ ~ 9 ~
' qtut~a~
\ v
UI+IIIIII i~ ~ ~ _ 4C
. '
ir„ ` PARKI
q~ I ~
~ N ~ IWAMAX j ~ - - ~ _ W
Z co)
r W m3
I *o° ~ ~ r ` t~ ~ ' 2 N Z
Z 1- wY
% ~ ` • ~p ~ I ~ Q ~
a
t co
10 410 1 a i (
W. r I ~ ' I wm ~
G I I I i M
.a , ' e~ 3 ~ SfTE PLAN
1-------~
~ - - ~ OF RECORO
.on 6~. Oota JULY fi. 100D
wwmb"rK *+R f-- I a/eiWf PaYDYM u~T Job Nu aDOL Oj
Oro.n Bf^ JlS/P5P
D.Cked Or zrd
ca.., ~ Y a w~nAr, o. i71or"ru 063+n-2 a+c
w a rmAum ~cfe~ra nucr a+tr
R.,.
Qro JAtI 17, 2PC1
~}~--A-~~--------------------------- ~ RECEIVED
~ gpOKANE COUNTY
FEB 22 2001
o a.e n.V so-W W.01 DIVISION OF PLANNIIVCI 51TE Pl1+N
LECA1_ OFKRIPTiOIi NOR7H
~
TRALT A Of SNORT P~AT 4q 12 b ACLOROIN4 70 PLA7 RfCDRpfO tN VOLUIIE IL OF 514ORT PLqTS PAGfS 60 61 IN SPOKIN£ COUNT7 WASiFINGTON, or~
Q(tUn TNAT POR11Rt Of 5A79 TRACT A QESGRiBED A9 fOlLCW9 l
BGGiMIGNG AT T1tE SOUTNF15? CORN_FR OF SAlD TRALT A 1HENLE ILOtY TNE 50U'fWERI.Y BQND0.ftT OF SAID TRAC7 A THE F0.10Wf'JG TW (Z) C0URfif9 1) AO~ Z
Kv~, A 77 00 FEtT Ili677'2i9J E 57 fEtT TLIENCC Ni0'Q~00 E 5417 f£tT TO A YOINY ON THE EA9TERL7 UNP Of 941D iRALT A. THP.tECE S00'074L 1~!
~LAI-0G SI.ID EASTERLY L1NL 516 FEE7 TO THE PO111T Of OEGIVNiNG
t3ar•
ofi,..69..'OPJ SS
to
f~~Q1 22 5 8 V0g463O345 F p,X Na 1
~11 14.1 ~ ~
Y0tE6R~5
rt
~ ~ .
' i •s ~ ~.r,~1►
J ! ~ ~6 ~ ~ ~ ~
s
~
dc
s• i
~ ~ ,1 ~ \ ~ • t-.~
~
~ w
=00 damp is ~ :
~ s~ ' • • -
r
;
.40
" ~ ~ •'r ~
1 ~ ~ ~ 7 • D
1 0 ~~O
'n, ~14'~,
%
r% • ~ ~ • -
.
' ~ 'f •
• o ~
u a• ` ~ ~
~ ` .
. ~
1 ,p w r• + r ` ~ e
sS
r►'`r ~
~ : • t
1 ~ ~
~ ~ a
AWON
,'D
E3kln
woO*
Noa~~,
L'Ot t 8,yy It~~
'D
C ~
W
$ 14 s~►~ , - ' -
03/11/2001 22 08 FA% zO1
.
:
y
Adams & Clark, Inc. 1720 W. Fourt, Av..
Civit Engineers • Land Surveyors t Land Planners • Landscape Architects 3pokane, WA 89204-1702
wava► adamsandcla&coin e-mail, acaadamsandclark com (509) 747-4600
1
FAx: (509) 7a 7-89 13
To: k9xLV5 FAx .41 •
ATTN.: DATE: s -
FROM, . RE•. • 101. Qe-itTi
Total Number of Pages (Includirtg This Pege) ~
.
COMMENTS:
•
~ Qt - N46&4*9
CA~ n%~h-r 1~o_Q• 741-
rmt.ociv D
~
BkWM couNmr Ec-~
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - i
~
This facsimile transmission (and/or the documents accortnpanying it) may contaln
confidentbial information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only fior the
use of the Individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
; hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any acdon in ;
' reliance on the contants of this infonnation is strictly prohiblted. !f you have received this I
' transmission in error, please immediately notify our office to airranga for ttae retum of the ~
~ documents.
~
AC-6
,
4 ~ E
1
1
- - -