ZE-18-89
Coi '
+
r
# Inc*
~
Taylor
~iva . ~ Pa~.~
~
AWA of
91
.
'Wi
~
~
AAWA
n Inc.
w Taylor E
Civil Design and Land Planning Prmc,pals
Perry M Taylor PE
Stanley R Sdrbng
Mark A Aronson, PE
David C Larsen, PE
r
Assocates
Scon M Buscli, PE
, Frank R Ide, ASLA
CWef Financial Officer.
Edwin G Wagncld
` Proposed 1997
University City
Shopping Center Expansion
Traffic Threshold Analysis
Date: September 30, 1997 Prepared by: William White, E.I.T.
Transportation Engineer
~
9~ g1
Taylor Engineenng, Inc.
o F wnsy,~~c< .
West 106 Mission Avenue .
Spokane, Washington 99201
Phone: (509) 328-3371
Fax: (509) 328-8224
' p~ 172
~FGISTEP~
~
DNaL
ExPiREs !p-al - q~
106 W Mission Ave • Spokane, WA 89201-2345 •(509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-8224
~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this traffic study is to obtain data and perform a threshold
analysis for the expansion of the University City shopping center in the Spokane Valley
east of Spokane, Washington. In accordance with the Spokane County guidelines
outlined to Taylor Engineering, Inc. on June, 26 1997, this analysis was to take the
existing traffic situation and verify that expansion would not unacceptably alter the
existing transportation network or planned Valley Couplet transportation network.
To verify that the University expansion would not unacceptably alter the respective
transportation systems, the following needed to be demonstrated:
1. That the expansion would not significantly impact the existing arterials or
planned valley couplet network; and/or
j 2. Unacceptably lower the intersection levels of service for intersections serving
the shopping center.
i In completing these tasks, existing conditions were determined, and four scenarios were
derived to describe existing and future situations. To establish existing conditions,
baseline data was obtained for:
~
1. Existing University City trip generation;
2. Existing University City intersection P.M. peak hour volumes and conditions;
3. Existing University City access peak hour volumes and locations;
4. Existing University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions after
shopping center construction;
~
Using the baseline data and the proposed expans~on, the following scenarios were
projected:
~ .
1. Predicted University City tnp generation after expansion;
2. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
without shopping center expansion or Valley Couplet construction; and
3. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
after shopping center expansion but without Valley Couplet construction; and
4. Predicted, 1999, University City access peak hour volumes and locations after
shopping center expansion and Valley Couplet construction.
FINDINGS:
University City Mall has 431,900ft2 gross leasible area (including Village Square).
~ From that, we calculated a full occupancy trip generation of 1,714 entering and exiting
P.M. peak hour tnps including remote ?ads and anchor tenants. The proposed
expansion of University City to a 512,900ft gross leasible area facility would create an
estimated trip generation of 1,876 entering and exiting P.M. peak hour trips. This is a
18. 8% increase in shopping center area, and a 9.5 % increase in trip generation.
Because of passerby opportunity to internal, remote pad sites, the relationship between
shopping center size and trip generation is not linear.
These tnp generation growth rates, in combination with the Spokane County predicted
regional growth rate of 2.5-3.5 were used to set up the series of before and after
scenarios described above. They were directionally redistributed to adequately predict
shopping center expansion impact results.
CONCLUSIONS:
The first conclusions involved intersection Levels Of Service, or LOS (See Glossary).
The overall intersection levels of service, used to describe the capacity and
functionality of an entire intersection, did not drop to unacceptable levels throughout
~ each of the various network scenanos. (Acceptable LOS is defined by Spokane County
Engineers to be any rating above LOS D for signalized intersections.) Therefore we
conclude that a full traffic study is not warranted on the basis of adverse intersection
, effects. The intersection LOS results follow in Table I on page iv.
The second conclusion was that the artenal network does not receive any unacceptable
increase in volume as a result of the proposed University City expansion. Present
access locations will remain the same. Valley Couplet accesses were assumed to be
negotiated, and reasonably limited.
The completion of the Valley couplet will bring substantial traffic volume improvement
for the transportation network surrounding University City. The addition of one way,
east bound, Second Avenue, and the conversion of Sprague Ave. to one way, west
bound will increase eastbound lane capacity by about 25 and westbound lane
capacity by about 40%, not including the high occupancy vehicle lanes. The split
u
~
couplet will also dramatically decrease the number of conflicting movements in the
University City area. This further increases capacity and safety for the east-west
arterial network.
Based upon the findings and conclusions of this threshold study, a full traffic study is
not required for the proposed University City expansion. The proposed University City
expansion will not generate sufficient traffic increase to exceed 5% of available
capacity with complete build-out with the surrounding existing network. Further, the
shopping center will be substantially better accommodated following construction of the
Valley Couplet.
Recommendations:
Building permit application process be allowed to proceed forward without further
traffic analysis.
~
~
' . .
Table I: LOS Intersection Scenario Results
Scenano Intersection Intersection LOS
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & University D
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts (1999)
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & University C
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & University B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & Farr B
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
, Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
iv
~
Table of Contents
. . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . .
Executive Summary i - iv
Table of Contents v
Threshold Analysis 1 - 28
Manual Count Summary and Traffic 29 - 42
Projections
Highway Capacity Manual Analysis 43 - 65
Glossary 66 - 67
,
~
I. Introduction, Assumptions and Methods Used
Taylor Engineering Inc., was retained to complete a threshold analysis for University
City Mall located in Spokane, Washington. Presently, University City mall, including
the main building, satellite buildings, and Village Square, is a 431,900ft2 gross leasable
area(GLA) retail mall. It is proposed to eventually expand to a 519,900ft2 GLA
shopping center. Present tenants will change. New tenants will include reta.il stores and
shops; such as, a new supermarket, vanous fast food restaurants, banks, and additional
general retail.
A threshold analysis is used to determine whether or not a full traffic impact study is
warranted for a development. A full study, and mitigation, is not required if the
threshold study verifies that the development will not:
1. Significantly modify the existing transportation network; or
2. Significantly effect the present intersection capacity or lower the level of service
below an acceptable level.
Improvements effecting traffic capacity for the University City mall will occur with the
development of the Spokane Valley Couplet. The Valley Couplet is a new transportation
sYstem that will imProve the traffic caPacitY between downtown and the SPokane
~
Valley. The Sprague-Second Avenue Couplet will be a dual arterial system. It will
change Sprague Avenue by rearranging the present lane configuration into a one way,
west bound, five-lane arterial including an added high occupancy vehicle lane. The
project will construct a new, one way, east bound Second Avenue arterial with four
lanes, including an added high occupancy vehicle lane. In phase I one of the South
Valley artenal project, both couplet routes will extend to University Road. Sprague
Avenue will maintain its present, two way configuration east of University Road until
later phases in the project. The exact date for completion of the Couplet is not firmly
set; however, the project is a high prionty project.
Regardless of scheduling for the completion of the Valley Couplet, the owner of
University City wishes to proceed with the shopping center expansion in phases. The
first phase will expand the east side of the University City shopping center main
~
building to accommodate an expanded supermarket. Further phases may, or may not,
proceed before the completion of the Valley Couplet. That schedule is dependent upon
market conditions and the discretion of the owner.
For the sake of this report, total mall completion was projected by a rather aggressive
target year of 1999. We used 1999 as a target date for expansion completion. Traffic
impacts were analyzed for the shopping center using only Sprague Avenue, and using
the completed Valley Couplet. It was presumed that traffic infrastructure which would
accommodate the full mall build out would adequately accommodate any smaller,
intermediate phases of expansion. Predictions beyond 1999 can be estimated from
Appendix 1 of this document.
The Valley Couplet will border expanded University City on two sides. Sprague
Avenue borders the site to the North, and Second Avenue to the South. This threshold
analysis will also determine the effects that the proposed expansion would have on the
proposed Valley Couplet. To meet the needs of the analysis, the Spokane County
Transportation Engineering Department has asked that the parameters above be viewed
within the context of the following issues:
1. Existing University City tnp generation;
2. Existing University City intersection P.M. peak hour volumes and conditions;
3. Existing University City access peak hour volumes and locations;
4. Existing University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions after
shopping center construction;
5. Predicted University City trip generation after expansion;
6. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
without shopping center expansion or Valley Couplet construction; and
7. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
after shopping center expansion without a Valley Couplet; and
8. Predicted, 1999, University City access peak hour volumes and locations after
shopping center expansion and with Valley Couplet construction.
,
2
,
II. Data Collection
The following tasks were completed for this threshold analysis:
A. Background Information
Information was collected to quantify existing University City conditions. This was
done as a baseline for an accurate projection of future traffic volumes, intersection
forecasts, and traffic capacity assessments prior to the proposed expansion. Data for
this came from the following sources:
• University City Existing Alta Survey (completed by Taylor Engineering, Inc. in
1989);
• Manual traffic counts for existing P.M. access volumes observed August 6,
1997; and
• Manual observation and sketches of roadway channelization, roadway
configuration, intersection configuration, and intersection traffic control device
location and coordination.
' B. Existing Traffic Conditions
Existing intersection mall trip generation, and driveway access volumes were required.
They determine present-day University City conditions with, and without, the addition
of the Valley Couplet. These are used as a basis of comparison for future traffic
impacts that the expanded shopping center would create upon the traffic network. The
sources for this information were collected or produced as follows:
• Intersection traffic counts provided by 1996 Spokane County surveys;
• Manual traffic counts for existing mall accesses; and
• Institute of Transportatron Engineers(ITL) Tnp Generatcon (Fifth Edition,
January 1991), or I.T.E. Trip Generation, for existing average-day, maximum
shopping center usage (Table l, page 1231).
3
'
C. Predicted Traffic Conditions
Predicted traffic conditions were derived to assess the impacts that the redeveloped
shopping center would have upon the traffic network. Most of the data was generated
from existing information except for the following intersection and trip generation
sources:
• Valley Couplet Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement completed
in May 1997;
• University City Master Site Plan #1(current proposal); and
• Insntute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (Fifth Edition, January
1991), or I.T.E. Trip Generation, for existing "worst case" scenario shopping
center usage at the expanded gross leasable area (Table 1, page 1231)..
'
i
4
!
III. Project Conditions
A. Background Information
University City mall is presently in the Spokane Valley, east of Spokane, Washington.
Primary access to University City is Sprague Avenue from the North. The present site
is bounded by Sprague Avenue to the north, Dartmouth Road to the west, and
University road to the east. See Figure 1 for location. (Figures are depicted in this
report by a capital "F" followed by the figure number)
University City mall is cunently an enclosed facility with one remote pad fast food
restaurant. The renovation will expand the retail shopping center perimeter west to
vacated Walnut Road. This will absorb the existing Village Square retail area and the
vacant parcel to the west of it. The area is bordered by Second Avenue to the south and
the southern property line of Wells Fargo Bank and various retail sites to the north. The
added Village Square property together with the western parcel will contain several new
remote pads. Proposed are retail stores and possibly a few banks, and/or fast food
restaurants. Access to the new area mainly comes from Dartmouth Road. The
remainder of the new remote pads will be located to the north and south of the main
University City mall building bounded by Sprague Avenue, Second Avenue, and
,
University Road. Some renovation of the east side of the main facility will be
completed to accommodate the addition of a larger supermarket. Figure 2 displays the
expanded University City shopping center. Figure 3 displays the existing University
City Mall.
B. Proj ect Trip Generation
Presently, University City is not operating at maximum capacity due to significant
vacancies. The maximum number of trips generated by the facility, or the critical
volume, and the traffic impacts anticipated by the redevelopment were obtained from the
Institute of Transportation Engineers: Trip Generatron (Fifth Edition, January 1991).
This reference is the nationally accepted compilation of traffic counts, surveys, and
5
,
, v
` Taylor Engineenng1l I~1.~.
Civg Desip and Land PLinning
13 1 MUNIIaUMtH1 ~-q I Att il i~; w
¢ i ( d4CK50t1 J4CKS0W AVE\
~ W r vi~ ~ ~I ~ `yp 3 H~C~AtiSIE ~ ¢
¢ / CL '
~ CARIIStE AYE ~ m w e OQ/~ m W \~rCO pF.0.
~ ERVI j'~c l ~
W; ~ Z MON7GOM_AY ^~E O > ~\F~m~ • ` ; so
y 'Z LL r
p ~ = y( I~ANSF{El0 1 avE 9~
9
~ uAN9:iEl0 ` ¢p ¢I a x
I ~p KNOX AVE ~o
,W~ W~ t~n SHA iNON
ttSM~YhON i S'ANNON
SHaNNONQ ° 1h .t►.~~* pi ~ gj
ni_tU ~INOIANA AVE INOIANA AV: ~
~ i, 1t Mit Z ~ al ~
'.a.a rJi~< ~ a INOt N~ 1 AV~ 1, O -l ~ Y ~
1 I Of ~ ` 5 N o o
x-~ 1 eil6wiN w INOtA ( AVE¢1 nV- ~1 NORA `IpOaA KOAA 04E
0 HOAA Ra
! AVE
~UCUST4 AUCUST~
e < g( 4UGUSTA
z 'o_ y
E laucusTaa ~ AvE ~ o ¢ Avcosri Av N
~dISSION AVE o m' m~ ~
~ Y I
MISSION ~~s °e I MAX'~VELL ot
< a W u~rw IdAXWEII_ i
~
Slh
N' ~I 0 m NAXWELL 7 SINTO~~ Valley o o--
i u_,axwEt ¢ t¢ u J~ o $IN10 Medical -
.1^Tpu.A~ s a SiNTO o i QAVE SINTO SINTO Cealer ° SH
O x SMRRP ~ Q1 o~ J. 0 0, SHAAP uj 3MANP iX m~+ o
W o~¢ BQONE c g~ ¢ 800NE ¢ ~ o BOON: a`u AVE Ft 800NE
1 ~toun cT o i Q~ z OESMET ~
~I o0E5uE11 c o o: ~l = ~ ¢ 0 DESME~ S ol
c Q oc~~¢i ~'t l>
~ a z ~At C ~
~ - ~ -I ~ ~ . ~ ¢ 4 0 JAtWE lN W W ! °~N CATAL00 ¢ ~
u~ I-T4L00 ;I C~TAt~~ 00 , ~ i tm ► CATAL00 =W~ }
GA ` ~
o ¢
~ °l ' o
Centenniel r ~ I o r~ 3 D EA" 1 b WI ; 21
ScAOOI o MAILON z
¢ ~
Al~4010 ■ l~ . H a C 0 ) m~ Z ~ o i~ iI ¢~i
10' o ~n , ~ Ness Elem 11 o g~ ~Q~ I m, ~ „ ~
> BROADV~AY AV_ .
Q, 0 BwaCway Elem 16 Nortn Pinef NI -
t'~ ~ SOPIhG
¢1 , ` N W Z ~¢i u~ o SPFiIHCAElO SMvGFIFiD Q Soa=criEtO Q 1r
t I W 7 ~ Z IAIKI JI r3- _ ALKI ALKI AVE
~ m ALKI o O ¢ o z
`AIKI J J-s
¢ J ¢ Q a ~ ¢ W OLIYE q OLIVE~ o O1
' o 0
u ~t a~ J~I ¢ VALIE' i WAY w u m mI VALIEY NAY
o YALLEY 1NAY
Spok2ne Valiayg p I NitOY o r. o NIXON NIXON ~I~p j`N ~l z j ~ Q
1 N 7 J Wf t Y►IN 161 " GI O ~O
M S = t K i S N tlM ~YF
HA I= A1+3t~ ¢ a ~ ¢ L1AIN AVt LN =
2-1 MAIN
RA! i~r O N N A I N I AY E A'•E Q Q < W -j O ; mi ;t ~rr E R i 0 ~ ;RrvE
~~E F
-1 Y " ? ~ = J 0 arvERSt~E J o 4) p aEaSroE r` ¢ el a ~ ~
5 _~v' rvEA5~0E ~ SPR.%GI E : m AVE u ~ ~ m - -
~ UII'!!)fkS/JY
`I IsT FliiST a-'e I s $NOPI'(fr(; ~n z►ro ►tanufc iST =1 I ~
N QI 2NO /;El~/~E~ [L ~ 2 B7SQO o~ mI W O
7RD 0 2ND AYE ~ ` 3q0 AVE ~ ~ EouesUon Z ]RO ~ _ ¢ 3RD AVE
4iH AVE 4TH AY: 7I 3~ ~
y ~e a I
AVEI oI ~ W a 5, a, ~I ~r Key
o a ¢ 0 7 STM CT) o o~ o° ~srH $1 °uI a~ ~ El
i o 6TM > I iTM
6TH' Q(~m w fiTM 4YE
c ¢ y ftN¢ €
~ 6TH f o $
~ o rn ~
:z x
'TH y I 71N avE W C
cuo Q W o a
u 2
F.C/./!'F N 20 BTH AVE Z c
~ , • 19 ~ ~
AACNEAY~~Vf a z1 9tM mI AVE
tttNA CiR ~ lp N N ~ 9TM ~V ~ ( 9TM AVE O Q
¢
%o ~tw ~vE~ r 10TN AVE ~I z ~¢s Q 10
DISII,t14,V H1LLS - 5
p „
µi~t ~
1TF~ I 11TN AVE J ~ ~ Oi
UnlvOcretty a
- P E.Ar r o Op~Qf1YQ~lY o{ xf ! ~ 12
= p'~ NATUR.`~L AR4A 'JiN M19h $c~ool ~ I 12TH AVE 31 ENem' ¢1 17~„ Q
13TH A'/E
B~~ ~I
i ~~~9~ y19o~S. ~ El u~il (27), CTH, 1I+~' f o ~
~~~i ~ \ c ~ 11.TM ~ _ Qqi 147N m~ , c 1 ~i
E, qaF ¢ l~Oq 15 TH ~ 01 ~ a~cl~> iSTHI 3~ ol 3 ~NI 15iH AVE ,ljS
m ~M~E i
9er 9 o Gr 3 o ~c ' ol E 16TH I AVE N1 ~i ~~C
o ~
- a ~ i !17TH I ( AVE 17TH 17 H ~ I,a,~ 6i c
Jntversity
~ 18TH AVE N cN~N) Elem I 1BTN ! ~AVE ~y tETM AVE igTK ~G~ ~ Il~ Q 1
I T H A V E V~ , 9 1 9 T H A V E ( ~ O o l ~ 1 9 T H o a e1- 9 B(
I¢ a
~ I I C y~ 19T E
20tH}AVE~~ @ TOTH ( (AVE ! AE oiN t F~ SE~
20THo 21ST °t 'AVE ~ r O~C v~ew YIEM 215T4f ~~"~T e ~,`t~'ti cG 99F
¢i a 215%
t `y { 1~ ° ~ u,~ Bowalfn zc ' = q 9
oq ~ NI p \O\q Q 22ND u AV£ ~1 ,{r MS Ir u 22ND AVE ~ 3bolNO ~E• O
qK ~ o 9 9 om N 2JRD=~ AVH p! ^ 'fi ~ 2~R0 AVE
A6, 28 Y ° nE~r Sout
70 A D'inc~ Ci~'~ 2:Tr~ Av,r
1 o ` ~ 1d?Ms, u~ 24TH I v+I AVE ~ e~rm + Z+TMa
o
21iM VE
~--`J 29 ~ ?STM ( IAYE o) a~ p`IST\'j57H AVE
ZrJTH V ~ 9[TY c1
267N t !ava r~
Fo
6
I , ,
- ~ a_ nk "'1 E1/wi~ •IIQd~w~ • ' Ci!A$+O►:a ' B~
I 1
~ i
1
I I
JD~71 Y N~ ti .~o., , w . v . - . ~
I
~y ~
~
~ ~ A
c~ier.e , JY' ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ l000 U •OiX'~~ ' - ~
y~ti 1 ~Y~IY ~ / ~w / 1 ' M~4 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H
~ . _ ~ .A ~ - - = _ _ r - ~ g P R A G U E P.== _ _ -~.-M _ . . - - • _ ~ - - - - - ~ L3 ~
. . , ~ ~ , A2 - - - - A3 _ . - - - - - - , f A A4 A ~ ~1 • ~ 1 1~ ~J ~~lli I~I~ ~ii t' I I~~i~ i ~~~V~~u ~I~~~~ ~ ~u'~VI ~ ~ ~ ~~V~~ L~ ~ ►
LZ ~ Qt~~PR L•h~ . a[NDdGMit . ~ Z , o o c~ o a~~ w. . • wcn ~ srr ` ~ un~w ~ i~ ~ • ~ , ~ ~ 04NC•~w41) ~
: =l'• , . ~ - ~ "d S ~ ~ ~ ~ , g~•T..R.,Hr i ~ , - ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ [ f r I i „ i i :a~o ~ I 'e~ x ~ ~ . _ , • ~ ~ ~l , O . • 1 ~ : i: . ► , • f , ~ r o ~ ~ ~ r
~ r~• .~y5 M * ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ • ♦ .J ~p, ~ ~ .r • ~ 11 11 ~ I ; , ~ . . ~M~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ! • 1 { i'
y1 . ; 1 i J (~i~~l~ ; ~ - :1 O O C ~ 1 , 1 1 ~ ~ .1. I e ~ ~
. . - ~ 1 - 1 A~ ~ . . _ ~ 'y. . 1 , ~ -1 A •L r . ~ , ~ ~ , a„ _ , ~ ~ : F ''s. _f : _c : ~ s 1 , , ~ ~ H / • 1~ M • 1• ~ , ~ I1~~/ Il~r ~1~~ 1 ~ r 4 ~ $ i~ Y d 0~~~ ~r. ~ d. ~ ~ ~ ' htiKM.Ll«A.M! ~ O-W r
• a_ _ ~ „ „ , , , ~ o ~ 1 . , ; ~ o 0 o c ~ ~ p • ~ . . i ~ ~ , ' ~ ' ~ , IB v s ef ~ "q ~ " ' ~ ~i , ~ ~Y~ ~ ~ ~ I G 1 1 C M:L . h►R!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O G ~ , • • ' ' ~ t o .i• , , ~ , , ~ a , h
i r . ~ as~ • i • ( ~ ~ , ~ ~ 4 ~cea . ~.f rf , ` ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i i U) Rc+75CO AC~OlCD t ~y r~ ~'7 1 ~~V 4~ tN~as ~ ~ ~
Q y~~ ill~1 ~ / • ~I~• • r ~ ~ ~ . ~ N~.IOK M/~,R ~ Q A ~ . ~I i I g~,i • • ~ r 2~OOiD ~ O ~ a~~Yr~rr«a~ rw~q^~tt~.~QM ~ ~ .^..i
..L^ Nl00~~ :CV~~~ ; ~ ~~~~..~f~1 ~ ~ ' ` l~~awf . ~ ` t' ~ _ 4ri~N ~4 ~ tt ~ t 1~ f~ r i~ r ' «K• N KtC00 ~tia i ~ Z + ~ OW~~ f • ~ t~>•~d , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~rsr~~ ~a e i ~ N
, Y Y f 7 L ~ 1 1 / ~~i I I ~ -l0~ I ~ 1~~1` 1' t~ ~ (u0'oA ~VC~~ ~ ~ ~ 4~nr ,.~F~ M fT I H I ~ ~ I~'1 tirs..~ ~ ~ r
~ v o Gv o o c o' s►~xs aooo~~ ~.~e-,•etw.c~ea~:u ~ t""`° ~~+e.e.o ~ ~ J • , ~ n ~ nQ~~ i ~.Q,.~ ~ , ~ , ~i~~• + , , "'~1 _I!L*~j~ ' ~oa~c~ ~ ~ ►
- 't : ~ ~ ~.1 l~I~~...~ ' G~'l•AS ~ y :JJOr . MOOG~~ ~ ~y.,C4'~ ~ ~,L ; 'I r I ~ i~OCV~~0090C~1 M000~~ ~ ~ . - .i» -i' ~L _ YA._ D ~ ~
~I ~ !~'1! 6" M;~ ~t q~ ~ M~i ii (~ia►w.r~ t~•~ eCtC~~ ~ ~ tRce R~~ I .m~w~ 1 i L 1. 1 , Zc
' - - -r- ' -r - " • ' ~ ' ~ f ~ ' - - ; - > . r J` _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ` ~ ~r . • ~ . ~ . ~ 1 _ . ~ (61 N
O C C7 O O O G ~ ~ • • p l~f , ~ . ~ y,: - A8 , . ..Q - . . • .i _ , ~ ~ . Q . ~ :t- -r v Q
1 ~~i~~~ ~~G~~ ~ ' ~ , ~e~~~~~~~~~Q~~~ •M ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ 1 ~a. . ~ ` ~ ...~s~ < / ' ~ ~ ~ ~l- Ql ` c e~:i~ 'i= > ~ ~ "•D f1 i L ,^rr',o 3 rL r' t ~ aQ ~
. ~ I - . _ ~ _ t e . ~~A~L N ~ : ~ t ~ _ - - _ _ ~ ~ , _1'- rooo~~ ..L. nooo.~ . ~ _ _ . , , . - , - . - - / L4 ' --'^r,.~~ti_ I. .~.r- ~ ~u. ~ y :.1. - •1 ' _ :i. i~ . ~ ■
' , : ~ ' y r ' ~ ~ i ~ ~ r . :'i' ~ ~ - ~ , ~ ~ . . ~ , ' .~,.n- . . 1 ' „ , . , , • ~ ~G r • ~ ~ i. ~ G:~ C~ O G? " V 1 I ~ 1~ 1 l 1 ~ "C7 ~ 1 ~ -o~ c~ ~ . .
~ - - , ~ , , : , ' v ~ ~ . • ~ ' ~ ` , ~ . , j ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ' f : ~ ~wW
~ , ~ r ~ , ~ , g. ~ ~ ' P , ~ , i , , , / ~ ..r~ . ~ ~ ~ 1 W Z
• ~ 1 . A1 ~ A11 _ . . . ; . A10 , ~ , , ~ ~
: ~ • ' ' ~ ~ , ~ ' ~ ~c;z:.e,~,, ~ . - ~ ~ . --:e . , ■ , . _ _ . __GOND A :~,,e.~ ` ~
i ~ . . _ ~ :T ' ! 1~~ - ! , ~ ,~c,c,c~ L ,~,•rco rA~T i[ • L~:LLCOClt ~~•c q ~ ■ Z~a
:coo.r ~cco.~ PQ ~ ~T INFOQuATICN ' 0.~- ~WN ~
j ~ i ~ ~ TOT4: E:~LCIN~ AfCA °I:4G0 4~ ~ i
~ ~ ~ . _ iOTW. °j~R~.~N6 PRJV~CEGti :~Ei ~ ~ PARt'~5 RATIO 4.',I / ICO: b~ B •WA, .
B~i t ~ " ~ ~rt Bereardo • will• 6rehHerlr. P [
~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ! GOOOALE& F ~ PAU& FI•ne Inc A ~eAlt~elur•
' ~ ► ' ~ BARBIER! 4r ~ ~ le COAfFAH![f ~a t1ER1 lst"ier• j - - ~ -
~ ~ ~ . ~ .
FOURtH AVE t ~ ~ , aa Jp~l~s• 11 f7:71 ~501) ~3! ISII ~
+~u 19 CXG qb
~~M 1' • 100 -O' m.... 14f .
O O R t r. 46-145
) ~ ~ , t ~ s 1 , r~ i ~ ~ ~ ) t # ~ ~ 4 l~lyl~Iiii1~~1~1 1 A~1l~l~ ~1lly \ ~ 1,11 ~
, ~t ~o~~~tte~ scN.e~ r•ioo-o• r t~f ~i • •~es•
~~u ~~a sua
0• •r/t~~
~
8
~Z ~ n ~ ~
( y~~M ~ ~ .
~ 710 F h i~ ~ J
. 0 1 ~ p• ~ l.~
~ ~ i~ ~ 3 _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - .
~ " = r ~ - - - > } i ` sM ~ ~=~".'"_~'~~'C~ • ' ..--eci~J~ ~ , v a
■ ~ -~J ~ w~ ~ , . Q~r r ~ e. g ~I ~ ~ Q~6 ; .i..-`~+~ ~ . , ~ ~ } %~j ~ 81 ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ , ~ ; 't,y ~ t ~~I r~ ~6 ~ 4 ~ +n ~ ~ ~A b .A~` : ~ ~ .t, e ' , I' ~p~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~p ~ , ' 4, ~ a ~1 ~ ~
I , ~ ' A I ~ ZQ ~ b 3 ! ~ , , ~ , a ,
i ~ ' ! ' ~ ~ i i 3' ~ ~ li ~ t 9 i ~ _
~t ~ Q s ' ~ t '1~ st ~ ~ 1 ~ d d~ ~ea: ~
V,,,1 I ~ ~'ct } ~ i i~ N 9 , I i ry~ , , . 1~ ^ ( t d ~ I
`I ~ ~~5~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ i 7~ ~ 1~7 ~ d~ 7 .r~ I'. ~ 1 •
L~ ~ ~ ~,t . : • , ~ a ~ ~ - ~ s ' ~j
~ j~ h' o~+, s( ~ ` R ~ I ~ a p I~ , ''',s~ I y.~, ~ ~ ~ s cn a~ ,1~ ~ ~
q~, ,~i, i ~ ; , 's s o°
~ ~ I'I .,L~{j ~ j ~ ~►i ~i~, ~ ~ `,d . 1 f ~ ~ ~ E~~'! ~ jn~ 4 • ~ ~ ~J} : , ' ~ ~ ` ~ dCttt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
H I i ~~M'~',4.~ 4 r + ► ~ '•ti .~ica ~8
J „a, a~ao► Q,r ~..w-Q a; ; \ 1 ' ~ D b o~ i L~ , ~Y ~ d ;a v°~.~ t l i ~
a ~ ~ 6 ~ q ~ s~ b ~ ~l ' w ~ j ~ ~I~~~ ~ ` ` i
° 1 ~ g~ ' ~ ~i ~~I~,r,i'. ~ ~ '~i~ ''3 a~
1, J , ~ : ~ ~ I d ~
I, Q,~,'_ -~u- r , t ~ ~ • i a ~I il ~b r i ~ ~ ~ 'i l ~ ; i
( ~ ~q 1 ~ v~ i' ~ ~ ~ 1~ a ~ r$ f'.~ I ~ ~1~ ° 1t ~ , S~~' ~ ~
~ , ~ 9 ' , ~ 1, ~ ~ o~or ~M0 Q:.,¢L :s~'••~ 4~ E ,I~ ~ ~ ~ ' , . 1 9
~ Q 1 ~~b ; ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ,
~ , ~ : =I~~ ~ s, ~
~ ~,p,~ ~a~ ~ ~ I ~i',~ ^°,~,~~I ` ~ ~
V ~ `M~ , ~ I ~~'b ~R~~ ~ [■'r''' i ~ qa ~ i _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z , f 7 ~ f q ~ I~~,i ~ a ~ 1~ i a p t~ ~ A y
(~~~r`~ ~ ~ 3 1 ~ i t ~ ~ 1',~~ a B~ ~ ~ IN~N ' ' ~ ' ~ . ~
J r _ b ~ a c nc ' I . ~ !'~'rr ; . . I- ~ IQ ~ .wrn ~ ~ ' ' t d : t'~t' ~ ~e';.~""~~ ~ ~ ~
~,A ~ ~ 1~ ' , ~ ~ ~ li d ~ ~Gi , „~,••r J ! i i i ~i=' . ~ietc.. ~ ~ p ~a ~~,y ~
v♦ I ~e ~ 'i~ ir=~t~~'' ~ ~ ~ a , ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r;~ li ~ ' ~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ W , ~ ; : r1; ~'t reii t :
I ~j~ ~l~ ~~~%;•%"..~•$:°•tit. .:i~i~:;fir' i ~ ~I~, ~ , .rr:' ~ ~y ~ ; ~~I~ ~ '
~ ; ~ 1--~ •,.'r:'~ aa ~ i ~ ~i 3~ N ~1~ ; R • ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i , ; : ~ s~ ` ~ ~J~ti ~ ~ ; ~ i t. ti "'11+ '~~i ~ lIi ~,~'~~~ti~,~ i~;.~, y~ ;'t;J~ { ; ,r~~ 7
~ ~ ~ t ~~+e~,siist~/i~ # 1 : i i ~ ; ~ ~ 1; ~
I~ OvOtiJ ~f' i~i+~' ~ ~ ~ ? E~: f ~ ~ ; ~ t ; ~ ~ ^~~yl~'~ r jl/ ~ 1 { ~ ~ ' ~ ' ''i
' ~ ^ ~ ~ ; , I t ~ ~ ~ 'S ~ t J ~ ti ti ~
~ ti . 11 f. 4 , ~ • ~ 1 M7~ ~ ~ 4 + ; : ra r u1K~' ~sr~4 ra•~s* ~ ~'1 G ~b~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ,7
, ~ ~ t . 't ~`J/• ~ t t = r f t t~a ' ~ k~ ~ I~ !t : j~ i; o%',~•'' : I~; i ; i 1 a~~~°~
' ^ ' ~ • ' r r ~y I 1' ~ ~ ~ ~'}""1 , J r ~ S ~ S ~ S~• ~00~
1 ~w ~ ~ ~~~~J~~~~t~~~"') J t~ ~ at s~.o." • I ~ ~ ' • I i~ j ~ ~ r S ' ~ q
~ $ eB~~ ~ ~J ti , ~ ~ ; r i r~ ~ i ~ ,~r ~.'~1
}h~7 ~ ~~~I~ p ~ i r f ji ~ ~ i '~.~cttt . ~ ~ ~g~ p ~ C~ e ~ 1 f ~ r . ~ ~~gpp$
6~~ ° ea nry~~~ ~e i W y~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ! t tl ~1 q~~~~.. a~ ~ ~ ~~a ep~~~° . ~~g~ 't~9paS~Ce $ I ~ j, f ~1~ ; ; ~ r ~ ~ b:~..~' r e ~o~~+:~~
~l~~~~ R~~ Al~R~R .1 C~ ( . % ~t 4 ~k •Rv 9~E °~~~pea°Qi~~~~P~~k~~~ re~ ~ ; e , ; , ~F ~ e ~~~aM
s ~ t~~ 9 s ! ~~3~3 ~ ~ 1 : . . ~ f 1 ~ ~ 1 j ' ~ F p'~ X eg.~! ep~ ~ h ~ s~' ; i•~, I ~ at~ ; .1 egd yD•d e•~ 9 C ~~Y k 1 """oot ~ ~ ~1cM id~Sr3~
. ~ ~~z~ ~~J~: ~3~~~'6e~~~ ~e c I G~~- acri+ ~ 8~ a~.~~ Y,,,e t•~,stl ggs~~~e8 ~ a T, a ~ ~
~`~~~~e a¢ !~e ~i~~~~ ~ i U ~ N I ~ a Qs 8p~8 ~ ~d ~e ~
~ s~~ 6~1~ s~~~ ~ ~ ,e8 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~e EQS Y~~D~~as~~'~ie~e~$ ' ~a
~ ~°'~=~;~~ee MP[.atS e '~8~~ t ~~~¢~i ~oj_~
e ~pF~~ 6j ~r~~e~;~~ 'Y I ~ ya x}`~i Q ~ ~~~~~~a~:~8~'~r~~~'k~e.~'~e~'~~.~iz ~ ~i
~ ~~~o , ~ p
{ ~ a ~ y
( u `J ~ ~ ~
.
s " ~ C
7 ~ ~ Y
. J e
~ ~ ~ 7 .
~ ~t ~ ~g~ z6 " ~„g~~ ~ i ~
~s~ ~Ce ~ ~ ~G~ ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ . e~~~~ 4 ~ e ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~g~~ ~ ~r ~ ■ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ? ~ r . r~~ C ~ a e~ ~ ~ t0 ~~6 ~ r ~
c s} _ ~ ~ ~ ~ y r ~~o~ h ~ ~ $ ~g 5 e 4 ~ , s Y~ h ~ ~ ~ ` ~ " • • •
i~ y e . ~ C ee ~ ~ ~ .S < r ~ p~, ~ ' }-Ses a ~ G ~ e~~~~ ~ b ~r ~ - , « ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~r ~ sd~ ~ ~ t~ ~ e I °C~ ~ ~ g ~ A~~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~i~ ~
Q • Q • 1 ~ ~d wt L 6 ~d~ B! ~05t e R p A Y! ~ ~ i~ • ~ ' 0 4 + ~ P~ g R 7~/~ ~ ~ IS'~j.~rQ:~• ~O~ IlO~~'~ W ~ M
= Ya~ ~•°~i ~ ~ 6 es~~~~~e ~ ~e s t ~ • o : ~b ~1 ~9 ~ ~ r « ~ o t~~ ~o.
p e~ ~ ~ 1~ ~1~ k' I ~ ~ I ~ m ~ e ~~S~~~L ~ • C o ~ ~ y. ~a p~ .
s~ i~e1~~ Q ~6~Q . d~l s~3 ~ ir~~i ~ ~ ~ ~~~e ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~
F
.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'
' historical data that give expected trip generation for land uses based upon factors such as
gross leasable area, number of employees, occupierl rooms, etc.
Trip generation for the shopping center is based upon the average P.M. peak hour
(evening rush-hour) in the day. The P.M. peak may or may not be the shopping centers
highest production of trips in the average day. It is, however, the time for the highest
potential conflict between work trips and shoppi.ng trips. Report analysis is also based
ugon the average time of the year. Christmas is always the peak season for shopping
center. Because shopping trips are discretionary and work trips are not, average
generauoa rates wi11 be used to assess shopping center impacts.
The maximum current trip generation of University City mall was based upfln the
existing 431,900ft of gross leasable area(GLA). GLA is all of the total floor area that
is designed for tenant occupancy and client use(Tnp Generation, 1991). The total area
includes the enclosed portions of the mall, the attached portions of the mall, and the
remote pad areas of the mall. It does not include hallways and non-leasable space.
' The maximum mp generation for the expanded mall was based upon 512,900ft2 GLA.
Tius total area inGludes the e3usting enclosed portions of the shopping center, the
redeveloped attacbed porUons of the shopping center, and the additional remote pads to
the shopping center. Trip generation statistics will be calculated for the ma11 as a whole.
Pass by trips for remote pads are accounted for in the selected hourly trip Yate table
used from the I.T.E. Trip Generation reference. Tenant types depicted are possible
tenants only. Specific tenants have not been identified, nor contracted.
At present size, the trip generahon produced by the mall was 1,714 tnps for the P.M.
Peak hour. After the shoPPing center is redeveloPed> there would be an estimated 1>876
'
P.M. geak hour trips produced. These numbers were obtained by pra-rating
' information provided in the I.T.E. tnp generation. This created a 9.5 percent increase
in tnp generation created by the shopping center expansion. Tnp Generation
iriformation is displayed below in Table 1. Ftgures 2 and 3 from before depict the area
' differences of University City before and afteL.
Table 1: Trip Generation for Existing and Redeveloped Universit,y City
~ Size Entering Leavi»g Total
Existing University City 4311900fe 771 tnps 943 tnps 1714 trips
Redeveloped University City 512,900ft? 844 trips 1032 tnps 1876 trips
Net Increase 18 . 8% 9. 5% 9. 5% 9. 5%
9
~
C. Project Trip Distribution
' The existing trip distnbution is established using cunent traffic movement patterns.
These tendencies were determined by examination of traffic patterns denved from
manual counts. For instance, existing eastbound traffic on Sprague Avenue and Farr
' Road is split, with 1% of vehicles turning south, 92 % of vehicles continuing east, and
7% of vehicles turning north. This 1%-92 %-7 % distnbution pattern was used to predict
how additional eastbound traffic at this intersection becomes distnbuted after expansion.
Traffic distnbution for redeveloped University City shopping center and the Valley
Couplet is based ugon personal observations and professional judgment. Intersection
distribution is a combination of Spokane County traffic volume growth projections, and
additional volumes as a result of University City expansion. These volumes were added
' to existing volumes according to project dispersal described above.
Existing and predicted access distnbution without the Valley Couplet is based upon
present observed directional distnbution. Predicted access distribution with the valley
couplet is based upon two factors. The first factor involves the approximate percent of
main mall building perimeter accessible by access location. From the preliminary plans,
we assumed that shops will be distributed fairly uniformly around the mall building. It
also assumes that the shops will be accesstble from within the mall comdor and fairly
directly from parking areas. Therefore, we have assumed a direct correlation between
access convenience and how much mall building perimeter is served. Figure 2 and 3
show the expanded University City access locations. For instance the northeast fast food
restaurant, the supermarket, and some of the main building can be accessed by the
driveway furthest to the northeast on the redeveloped site plan. Then they are allocated
against the north side of the shopping center, as a whole, to determine a percentage of
usage. In this example, the usage of the northeast fast food and supermarket dnveway
was determined to be 15 % of the entire north side of the facility.
~ The second factor for determining the driveway distnbution involves the percentage of
turn around vehicles, or vehicles that traverse using Dartmouth to reach the other side
of the facility. Dartmouth is an on site pnvate drive that will allow through access, and
' access to the shopping center. When vehicles wish to access the south side of the
shopping center from Sprague Avenue, they must dnve around the entire building to
reach their desired location. This favors the use of the Dartmouth Road access as a
' means of approach. Some vehicles would use Dartmouth Road as a means of crossing
one-way, westbound Sprague Avenue to head east. To account for these situations,
20 % of the volume was added to the access perimeter percentage to determine an
appropriate distribution. The percentages were reconfigured as a whole to account for
this additional distnbution. Finally, overall usage of the southbound, Dartmouth Road
access after recompilation of the entire north side of the facility was 35 The same
premise was used for traffic heading east on Second avenue even though the `cut-
through' percentage is not as large. This is because vehicles traverse less of the building
heading east on Second Avenue than they do traveling west on Sprague Avenue. Also,
10
'
'
the convenience of the accesses from University Road to the east makes access to the
north side of the mall more suitable. Since there was more traffic utilization headed
, north than south on Dartmouth Road, only 5% of the access volume was used for these
cut-through vehicles. This resulted in a total access usage of 13 % on the south side of
expanded University City.
1
!
1
1
1
t
'
III. Existing Conditions
A. Existing Transportation System
' The boundary streets and access characteristics of University City are descnbed below.
Sprague Avenue is a major east-west principal arterial linking Spokane City to the
Spokane Valley. The street presently has three lanes in each direction of traffic flow.
There is an intermittent lane providing concrete-protected left turns into University City
at specific locations. Sprague Avenue accesses the North side of University City at
seven different locations. One of the locations is signalized. This signalized access
begins at Sprague Ave. and terminates within the confines of University City. The
access is a T-intersection and allows a full range of turning movements.
Three of the remaining six accesses allow west bound vehicles to make left turns into
University City. These three accesses also allow for vehicles to make left-turns from
University City onto Sprague Avenue and travel west. All accesses allow nght turning
vehicles to and from Sprague avenue (nght in - right out).
'
University Road has three southbound, and two northbound lanes of traffic spanning
north to south with an intermittent, concrete protected lane allowing turning movements
, along most of the University frontage with the arterial. The three southbound lanes
narrow to two lanes after the southern extents of University City. The four-way
intersection of University Road and Sprague Avenue allows for all turning movements.
University City is presently accessed by three driveways along University Road. The
access to the north allows for south-bound vehicles to enter and exit the University city
parking facility by way of right-turns. The middle access allows for southbound
vehicles to enter and exit by right turns, and allows north-bound, left-turn entrances.
The south access allows full turning movements for north-bound and south-bound
entrances and exits.
12
Dartmouth Road is presently a lightly used, two-way, two-lane, north-south con-idor
intersecting Sprague Avenue on the southern side of University City. The road
terminates at the southern University City property line. There are three accesses to
University City and three accesses to Village Square from this road. The two northern-
most accesses for both locations allow permitted turning movements to and from their
respective locations. The southern accesses, respectively, allow turning movements to
travel either direction from southbound traffic. See Figure 2 for existing and future
shopping center boundaries, access locations, and signalization location.
B. Existing Transportation Scenario
The existing scenario for University City depicts the present, 1997 configuration of the
facility without renovation, expansion, or the addition of the Spokane Valley couplet.
Figure 4 shows this network scenario and the traffic movements that access University
City at these location. The peak hour traffic volumes are given for each individual
movement at that access. Accesses are labeled with an "A" and a number signifying a
particular access.
Intersections are marked on the figure with an "L", then a number, signifying a signal
location. All movements allowed at the intersection are displayed. The peak hour
volumes per movement are also displayed.
The adjusted "existing" scenario projected the maximum, full occupancy, volumes
(based upon 100 % occupancy) that could be generated by University City. These
maximum volumes were a result of prorated calculations based upon the I.T.E. Tri~
Generation reference. The existing counts were increased 65 % to reflect the 413,900ft
of GLA volumes fully occupied as determined by the I.T.E. Tnp Generation reference.
The new access and intersection volumes were redistnbuted to reflect the existing traffic
splits. This scenario with access turning movements and volumes, as well as
intersection turning movements and volumes, can be seen in Figure 5.
~
C. Existing Intersection Analysis
Level of Service, LOS, ls a term used to descnbe the functionality of a traffic situation.
The Highway Capacity Manual defines LOS as the qualitative measures that characterize
operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perceptions by motorists. There
~ are six levels of LOS ranging from A to F, with A denoting the best LOS, and F
denoting the worst LOS.
For intersections, LOS is a function of the volume over capacity (V/C) ratio, or stopped
delay per vehicle. The V/C ratio is used to quantify the working charactenstics of a road
or intersection by taking the measured volume of a road or intersection and dividing it
by the maximum design capacity of the road or intersection. The stopped delay per
vehicle descnbes the waiting time that a particular vehicle must endure before clearing a
13
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~■r r ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~
FARR ~ ° ~
Z ~ ~ N ~ ~
' ~ U~`_V ~ ~f"`~$j N ~ r
mD ~Z o ~ ~ N
vll UN N I
~ n~n ~ ~ ~ ~ D N
oN mm w
~~Z~ o~o ~~N ' z°-~z
~ D ~
D~~A rn O
o~oZ D
<ZC~ ~ ~
o~m~, N
~ZNo ~
rnn ~ ° cn m y D
~ z ~ ~ C~1
~v N ~
DARTMOUTH ~
W
~
~ C ~
D
~ ~ ~ ~
~ C ~
~
O~~
C~ ~ ~ C~ ~ 6ALFOUR RD,
O~
C C~ RAYMOND RD.
~
~
D
~ ~ N
UNiVERSITY
0
~ ~ ~ ~
~ D
D ~
~ C ~ w
~ ~
~
~ D v ~
N N Ow ~
T T W nA V. O V
~ N O ~ ~ W
~ D~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N
r ~J VV
t~ O W ~ r ~ ~ N
l/~ ~ ~ v O"~ ~~c~ / %
a~ ~ , - ~ ~
D N ~ ~
V
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ D o
~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~
►
ni i ~
~ j ~j~~lylUt' Lll~lil('t'I'lll~, lI1C. DAIE
Civil Design and Land Planning Dw~i
W 106 I4iission Ave. CK'D'
Spokane, Wasliingkon 99201
(509) 32~-3371 FA~I' (5Q9) 32Q-8224
►~ev~►~~ ~►r ~~n~ ~ ~►~~c ~nQ ~YICTIAIr I IAl11IG'RCITY rITY
VVL.VnIL,*-7 0 vn Li~~~ ~~olov vlva
ACCESS LOCATIONS UNIVERSITY CITY
(4:15 TO 5:15 PEAK HOUR) REDEVELOPMENT
\
. ~ . ~
~ ~ d
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ Z ~
~ 18 Q 29 33 - ~ I
~ 10 6 J 11 19 w I W
Q Q 1 W . Q ~z -i W Q
~a t2 ~ ~ 4 U Q~ 5 ~ ~ U) ~ C U Q ~ Y (l') p 0 U
9
7 13
~ 16 ~
13
7 46 28 38 e ~ V)
7 ~
19 24 15 ~
1401~ 1047 6 Z
~ 15 200 70 . ~
10 ' sa ~ U Itt Q CQ
so ~ 82 aCQi W
76 56 ~ 35 1199~ ~854 ~ ~ i ~
25 a0 ~ ° ~ Z
18 134 ~ 171 ~i R ^ ~a ~ Q a'~ ~ Q.
31 40 146 87 ~ ~ ~ 4) X
134 ~ a 32 ~ ~ ~oo.o W
~ ~ ' ~"i ~
rl R ~ ~ O
NOTE: INTERSECTION COUNTS SHOW ALL ~ WG LL.
MOVEMENTS AND VOLUMES. o ACCESSES DISPLAY ENTRANCE AND ~ c V)
8 B a EXIT MOVMENTS AND VOLUMES ONLY. ~ 0 S~ A ~ o ~ W O ~ cQ mo
~ ~ ^ ~ ~
~d
i 73 [ + _ -
1 ~
~ ~
= 29 H
~ i
0
~ F- ~ ~ t J
~
Q ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 4
Q N ~1. ~ X W
10
6 ~ ~1 Z
~ 9
10
14
cntical point or intersection. For this study, we will use the V/C ratio to descnbe the
levels of LOS at intersections.
Table 2: Intersection LOS Descriptions
LOS Delay (sec/veh) Interpretation
A < 5 Little or no vehicle delay.
B > 5 and 15 Good vehicle progression with light congestion.
C > 15 and 25 Fair progression with occasional backups and some
congestaon.
D > 25 and _ 40 Unfavorable progression with noticeable congestion.
E > 40 and 60 Poor progression reaching the limit of acceptable delay.
F > 60 Failure in the system with limited progression and high
conestion.
Soucce Highway Cepac►ty Manual (Transportation Research Board, 1994)
Existing intersections important to this site include Sprague Avenue and Farr Road, and
Sprague Avenue and University Road. Intersection counts for Sprague Avenue and Farr
Road, and Sprague Avenue and University Road were obtained from Spokane County
sources The count are a result of a 1996 P.M. peak hour traffic count between 3:30
P.M. and 6:30 P.M. done in 15 minute intervals. The peak hour is the four highest
consecutive 15-minute traffic volumes intervals for the site on a typical day.
, To obtain existing 1997 intersection volumes, the 1996 traffic counts were projected one
year. The 1996 traffic counts had been completed for the Spokane Valley couplet
project by Spokane County Engineers. Based upon histoncal data, they projected traffic
growth to 2010. By using Spokane County projections, the 1997 traffic volumes could
be derived by interpolation based upon the growth rates from 1996 to 2010. In some
cases, the rate between the respective intersection legs, or movements, was not the
same. The growth rate ranged from 2.0 %-3.0 % depending upon the movement. An
average growth rate of 2.25 % was. The projections can be viewed in Appendix 1 of
' this report.
LOS were determined for each intersection for companson with the LOS for
redeveloped University City without the Valley Couplet. This permitted the impacts of
the shopping center to be viewed against predicted traffic volume increases The LOS
was derived by use of the Highway Capacrty Manual Software: Release 2 by the
, Transportation Research Center at the University of Flonda.
The overall intersection LOS for the maximum 1997 volumes at Sprague Avenue and
Farr Road was a B rating. The overall intersection LOS for Sprague Avenue and
University Road was a C rating. As stated above, this implies faur progression with
occasional backup, and some congestion. This rating is acceptable according to cunent
Spokane County cnteria.
16
~ * •
D. EIC15tl*Iig Ai'tePlal aAnSlyS1s
~ To determine LOS for arry specific segment of a principle urban arterial is complex.
Arted'al LOS is a combination of the number of lanes per directian of vehicle flour, the
arnaunt of +conflict that traffic endures while traversing a rvad sectivn, and the speed
~ rnaintauned while traversing the raad sectian. Presently, the Highway Capacity Marxual
uses average travel speeds ta define LOS. The cntena far pnr►eipa-I type 11 arteri2ls
w ith free flvw speeds of 30-35 mph are follows:
TaUie 3: LOS Criteria fur Type II Arterials
A w
Level of Service Average Travel Speed(mph)
~ A ? 30
B ? 24
~ c ~18
D ? 14
E ~ 10
F < to
~
Source Highway Caps€4ty Manual [I"ranspos-tatian Research Baard, 1994
~ Travel speeds on Sgrague Avenue are we11 above 18 miles per hour, which is the cutoff
for the C LOS. The principles behind artenal LOS determinations are stmilar to thase
usW for intersectlon LOS determiriations. Even though speed is the means for
~ categonzing LOS, there st111 needs to be a decent rna.ximlzat1on of the functionality of an
artenal road segment withaut causing too much delay. Because Sprague Avenue
currently has aC rating, and LOS x] is acceptable, then Sprague Avenue is well within
~ the accepted cntena far pnncipal artenals.
~
~
~
17
~
'
'
'
III. Predicted Conditions
A. Anticipated Transportation System
Sprague Avenue, after the implementation of Phase I of the Valley Couplet project,
' will be a five-lane, one-way, east-bound arterial with an added high occupancy
vehicle(HOV) lane in the same direction. This is a represents a 40% increase in the
directional lane capacity of the arterial not including the capacity of the HOV lane.
, Access to UniversitY CitY and the new remote pads will have been reduced to five
locations from the original seven locations in cooperation with the Spokane County
request for limited access. Conflict will still occur in the outer lanes of Sprague road,
but the number and severity of conflicts will decrease due to one-way travel. Sprague
Avenue converts back to the existing 6 lane, two-direction arterial east of University
Road during this first phase of the Valley Couplet project.
University Road will relatively remain the same with the exception of channelization
adjustment near Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue to compensate for one-way travel.
At this time, lane allocation and channelization have not fully been addressed for the
Valley Couplet project. Based upon the nature of the high volumes directed north to
' reach Sprague Avenue where it once again begins to incorporate east-bound vehicles, we
made be an assumption of two north-bound lanes to accommodate traffic volumes. This
assumption was made for the purpose of the Highway Capacity Software intersection
i analysis for situations involving the couplet later on in this report.
Second Avenue is the other component of the Valley Couplet Project. This road will
~ allow five lanes of west-bound, one-waY, traffic. This increases the cunent SPrague
Avenue westbound lane capacity by 40 The expansion to Second Avenue will grant
significant access to the south side of University City. Conflicting movements will
occur in the outer lanes near retail accesses on the north side of Second Avenue.
Dartmouth Road will be remain an access for the westerly one-third of University
City, but the road will be extended to connect Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue.
1'he road will access much of the redeveloped University City as well as carry turn
18
'
around traffic, traffic that wishes to access the opposite side of University City, and
emergency vehicles. There will be significant conflicting vehicle and pedestrian
' movements on this two lane road within the mall property; however, the Valley Fire
Station (District 1) prefers this route stays open.
B. Anticipated Transportation Scenarios
There are four scenarios projected for this report They were derived for comparison
against the existing scenario to adequately verify whether or not University City
expansion would require a full traffic study. The first anticipated scenario was the
redevelopment of University City without the use of the couplet. This took the
maximum (full occupancy) existing volumes and expanded them by a factor of 9.5 % to
reflect the change in GLA. This expansion rate was based upon the Tnp Generation
tables referenced earlier in this report. This scenario would include any phases up
through complete build-out of the project. Access movements, access volumes,
intersection movements, and intersection volumes for this scenano is shown in Figure 6.
The second scenario escalates all volumes from the previous scenario by a ratio between
2.0 % and 3.0 % per year until 1999. The rate is the growth rate derived by Spokane
County observations and calculations. This also includes any possible interim phases
until project build-out. The actual rate used for this report was about 2.25 The
redeveloped 1999 University City scenario without the Spokane Valley couplet can be
viewed in Figure 7.
The Spokane Valley Couplet will significantly redirect traffic and add capacity in the
Spokane Valley. The third scenario incorporates the existence of the couplet with the
redevelopment of the University City shopping center. The result is a redistribution of
1997 maximum volumes to reflect the traffic trends and additional volumes predicted to
by Spokane County engineers. This 1997 redeveloped University City with the Spokane
Valley couplet scenano can be viewed in Figure 8.
~
The fourth scenario takes the 1997 redeveloped University City with the Spokane Valley
Couplet scenario and predicts the growth rate to 1999. The premise uses the same
' growth rate of 2.0% and 3.0% per year to predict 1999 volumes. The resulting 1999
rerleveloped University Ctty with the Spokane Valley couplet scenano can be viewed in
Figure 9.
C. Anticipated Intersection Analysis
After the construction of the couplet, anticipated intersections that will be important to
the redeveloped project site include the Sprague Avenue and Farr Road, Sprague
Avenue and University Road, Second Avenue and Farr Road, and Second Avenue and
University Road. Intersection count projections for the intersections were obtained from
the Spokane County traffic volume projections to 2010. The counts are a result of the
same P.M. peak hour counts used in existing analysis.
19
. ~
~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
v rn
J O .r ~
FARR ~ ~ N
O ~ ~ N w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ r
D~Z N ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ ~N~c~n ~ ~ ~ ~-I D
°m z~ N
~N~~ ~
ZNDZ ~
~r~n ~ O ~
O-C OZ D
<ZC~ ~ ~ 0 ~N ~ ~
C~N= ~ ~2' ~ U
rn m ~
N D D o Z F ~ C,~
~v ~
~
DARTMOU TH ~ , ~
~
~
~
C N ~
Z ~ ~
~ C ~ ~
C~ ~
D BALFOUR RD.
O~
z C~ RAYMOND RD,
~ ~
~ V
D
~ ~ ~
, UNIVERSITY ~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
D ~ ~ ~
G~ C o ~
~ ~
~ 0
~ D
~ ~ N N N ~ ~
p1 J ~ ~ N O N
~ N O ~ ~ OC
O ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ r N
~ N~ ~ aN
O ~ ~
O ~ ~ ~ v NN~ N NJ ~ ~ v
0 0
v N , D
n~ ~ o0
~ ~
w D N D ~ ~ ~
c~ ~
~
SCALE ~ ~ Taylor Engineering, Inc. DATE
Civil Design and Land Planning DWN W 106 Mission Ave. CK'D
Spokane, Washington 9~J201
(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224
nn~n~nTrn ~ini i ~~~rr rI1D CVnAAlfl~ll I IAII~I['DCITV
rrctVlLo I Cu VVLUMCJ r VR CAr-r'►ivuCV vivi vCnJl I I CITY ACCESS LOCATIONS 6Y 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY
4:15 TO 5:15 PEAK HOUR REDEVELOPMENT
` J rAnn nrr("S; niN,sF 97-07Q
~ a ~ I ~
~ ra ~ o _ - CL ~ -O `
_ _ ~ w
4 ~ > _ ~ W ~ W
, 7~ - ~ ~ 'i ~.1 . 2 ly
lJ.a ~ ~ ~
~ JWZ. 4 t- ~ Q~Y / ~ -
/ . ~ o~ 94 N C~ d
6 5 Q'1 ~
o a~ ~y 2 6 C3D
1i 3 4 ~ ~ ~ t3'~
4 Q 0 ~ t~ ~
W o 4
~ a ~ a ac o /
. 1 • J ~ ~ C CL o
39 ~ 42 2 . z oU. J
~9 45 Q ~ 16 • ~ W 7 ~2 - 78 t9 N
to U Q ~ 42 ~ 9 ~ 1~1 '4 Q O
2 23 4 29 263 4 f 16 r+ ne ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~Z
8$ ~ o ~2 ^ r ~ ~ 146 62 ~ ~ ~
~a tL. ~ a~ ~ ~ - ~ti ~
1051 . ~ ~ ~ a ~n ti t ~ ~ ~
, t699 ~ ~,o i 48 ~ ~ a 2 .,a NI
, ~ ~N a ~ ; w ~ ~ ^
~c ~ ~ 4a ~6 _ 95 ~04 ~
7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Zt7 co ~ ~4$ ~ O • C.
~ q6 { ~ c'~ W ao A c~ ~
g ~ N x I . ~ ti3~8 a~ t~ / ~ ~ ~ . ~
0~7' ' . - p c~ i$4 . N ~ ~
az , - z6 r'' , ~ a , _ - ~ ~ _ t ~ ~
td ~ I 26 J erT = ~
a ~ ~a 19 ti _ , 36 a ~ -
~ 3~ ~
1 1 237
1 -
~
Au- 9a ow SN
N~ ~ou ON MES~ C~ I.U D RSE VO ~N y Tr
. N~ ND NCE SA A . ~ N1 N~ 1.'~ N4 ME Y E ON OV'~ lA ES e
M ~sP uM ~ o ~o~ SE NO CES A A~ N~
E VM M4 XIS E
A7
~ ,3
~
r ~ ~ 4
32 ~
Q ~ ~ r ~9 . ~ . ~
N Zg r ~ I . ~
~ 0~ Q 32
~ '
2 2~
~ s
~ /
OG ~ ~ ~ i ,,,r•~
/ Q
~
~
~r~~~~~~w~~■r~ Air~~~~~~
FARR ~
o N o r ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~N N
~ ~
o r C-,~ Z~ DZ D ~ ~ ornF~ ~ ~~N N
N~'j ~ m cn o cn xm m ~
~
~o Zo
~ o~,-~z W
~ ~ Z~o~ D
D c z
pz mN
N ~N ~v c - y~
mZ ~ ~
Nn ~ m o ~
~
DARTMOUTH ~
N
~
D -r ~
~ ~ ~'o ~ W~ D
7 ~
~ ~ ~
o~ ~
D BALFOUR RD.
~ ~
O~
z C~ RAYMOND RD.
~ ~
D
O A
UNIVERSITY ~ -
A
~
D ~
co ~ ~ ~
~ n ~ D ~ O ~ ~
Z C
v ~ G~ N
P D
~ ~
~ w .
/v/ ~ N
v N ~ ~
w ~ °
~ ~ ~ D N ~
~~W ~
~
N ~ ~ ~ - w ~
~ Na~ ~ D N
~ ~
D w D 9 ~
W ~ rn ~ V VJ
SCALE
~ i Taylor Engineering, Inc. DATE
Civil Design and Land Planning DWN lY 106 M~ssion Ave. CK~D
Spokane, ~Yash~ngton 99201
(509) 32a-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224
I1Al~A~ATf~f1 ~ AA'7 \ ~ • ~i~~ ■ ~ ~A1 1 lf ^ r~If1 L AIAPf1
rKtUIL I tU 1 yy 1 MAxIMUM YVLUMtJ: tArAn1UtU
UNIVERSITY CITY WITH VALLEY COUPLET ACCESS UNIVERSITY CITY
4:15 TO 5:15 PEAK HOUR REDEVELOPMENT
1 7' ~o
-J ~ (!1 ~,,1 . ~ - ~ - t ~
4 ~7 ~ 1s1 ~,1
, ~ ~ 4 - r
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ~yJ U- .
, I,,J 4 / Z f,
O d ~ ~ . 25 t~ U OG o ~ 1 ~
U / . o ~ oc ~
~ 0 ~ ~y a
/ Z 3~ {i 4 ~ a o , ~ c~ ~
~ ~ U o W /
r a w ~
4 ~ ~ Q pC r ~r
zs C~ , ~r ~ W cr
JO . pG a:
. 49 ~3 • d, * • i t!a Q ~S °
c~ N N Q ~
p ~ V 49 3 ~ ~p ~ I ~ ~U~ ~
~ ~ ~ O N 8 ~t c^. ~
6 4161 ~ 1 7 2? ~ ~ ~ li ~ ~ca~~'~ . t. - _ - -
0 .~aQ~a . 62 4 > ~
, 1064 ~~~n0' ~ - ~ ~ o
234 N c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , a ~~w ~
~ ~ N ~ ~ -
a6 - ~ d r ti ~1 ~ cp .a 8 la O ' r
x 42~ 1236 ~ A-+ °1 M 420 W ~ ~ ~ t.t
23 ~ - m ~ l 5q , y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
13 ~ p, o N ~ , o • ~ a
9 . ~ ~ C . 23 ~ r ~ t
2s cd ~ ° ~
~9 . N ~ $3 ~ ~ z -IF ~
5~ ►
i ,oa t-
- ZZa
i ` ~ f~_ ~ • • ~i'
LA`l O~SP ~9 ~
N~~ ~ ~ GQU ~ION S. ~C ME RS o~u ~
. N~ T V CE I EN AN VM N~ Y, N~ MO `f ~ ONi-
ll p1.A+ ES A pIS UM - S VOL SE 1 CES EN A~ 0~ }
~M , EX~ AND
~4
639 t S i 7- ~
• A2
/ ~ y ~
t 12~ ~ 26 r
OG 7 _ 99 5~
0 g40
154 ~ r 2 , 23 r. W
505 ~ ~ / a
4 90 r-~-''' !
a OC
pG 54 126 Q ~
1Y
~ 19
, r.,..~ ~ ~ i
,
To obtaun predicted 1997 redeveloped University City intersection volumes, 1999
redeveloped University City intersection volumes, 1997 redeveloped University City
intersection Volumes with the couplet, and 1999 redeveloped University City
intersection Volumes with the couplet; all maximum projected volumes were
extrapolated with expanded tnps of 9.5%. For volume predictions that assumed the
completion of the couplet, the maximum traffic volumes were again combined with the
expanded mall GLA factor, then distnbuted according to earlier Spokane County trip
distributions and manual driveway distnbution calculations. The traffic volumes per
movement of each scenano are shown in Appendix 1 and Figures 4-9.
LOS were determined for intersections without the couplet for companson against the
existing University City intersection LOS. This information was needed to verify that
an acceptable LOS D or above is maintained for the intersections adjacent to University
City.
The overall predicted maximum intersection LOS for the 1997 redeveloped University
City intersection of Sprague Avenue and Farr Road remained at a B rating. The overall
predicted maximum intersection LOS for the 1997 redeveloped University City
intersection of Sprague Avenue and University Road dropped from LOS C to LOS D.
This drop in LOS stays within the acceptable range of LOS for signalized intersections.
The 1999 predictions remain the same as the 1997 expanded predictions for both
intersections.
The Valley Couplet scenanos were assessed for this study by making reasonable
assessments of the possible intersection configurations and phases. The actual
intersection configurations for the Valley Couplet have not been designed. When they
are completed based upon Spokane County Engineer's design, the LOS change.
Presently, the LOS analysis for Sprague Avenue and Farr, Second Avenue and
University, and Second Avenue and Fan all yielded a LOS B for 1997 and 1999
maximum, expanded University City scenanos. The intersection of Sprague and
University was at a LOS D. This would be because of the large eastbound traffic
~
volumes that are wishing to make a northbound nght onto existing Sprague Avenue, east
of University Road. For the sake of analysis, it was assumed that two lanes were
provided to accommodate northbound nght turns. An analysis of existing volumes with
the couplet was completed to show the companson of Sprague Avenue and University
Road LOS. This analysis yielded a C LOS. This signifies a drop of LOS due to
, University City expansion, but not below acceptable LOS. Also, the large volumes
being analyzed were a result of the Valley Couplet project temporary Phase I
configuration, not the University City expanston.
All Highway Capacity Manual software executions of these intersections by scenario can
be seen in Appendix 2 of this report. A summary of the results is located in Table 5
below:
24
Table 5: LOS Intersection Scenario Results
Scenario Intersection Intersection LOS
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & Fan B
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & University D
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts (1999)
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & University C
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & University B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & Farr B
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloged Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
' D. Anticipated Arterial Analysis
The travel speeds on Sprague Avenue are not anticipated to change. The intersection
LOS analysis from above does show some drops in LOS. All of these drops remain
within acceptable operating parameters. Completion of the Valley couplet will more
than compensate for any capacity loss which would arise from the proposed expansion
of University City. The completion of the couplet will also direct traffic in a single
direcuon. This reduces conflict, and keeps traffic speeds relatively higher. The same
25
situation applies to Second Avenue. There is no anticipation of unacceptably slow
traffic speeds due to congestion. Since the average speed on the artenal will be well
above 18 mph, the LOS for both should be a C rating or better. This is completely
acceptable and verifies that no significant adverse change will occur in the network due
to the proposed University City expansion.
Sprague Avenue, University Road, and Farr Road will remain acceptable in report
scenarios with the redevelopment of University City mall without Valley Couplet. The
total directional arterial volume splits were made the same as the existing volume splits
on Sprague Avenue.
26
IV. Conclusions
A. Arterial System
The redevelopment of University City will not effect the horizontal geometrics of the
new Valley Couplet. One premise for the proposed expansion is to keep existing
accesses on Sprague and University at the same locations and reasonably limit additional
accesses along Second Avenue. After analyzing the anticipated traffic impacts for the
proposed University City expansion, it was determined that there was no unacceptable
impact to sunounding arterials. This includes both the present configuration and the
potential future configuration following construction of the Valley Couplet. With these
conditions established, no further traffic analysis is warranted based upon arterial
impacts.
B. Intersection Analysis
As shown in Table 5 above, none of the overall intersection LOS's drop below
acceptable levels. The scenario of the completion of the mall expansion without the
completion of the Valley Couplet showed that the existing intersections will not be
unacceptably effected with the increase in traffic volumes. The intersection of Sprague
Avenue and Farr Road remain the same with an overall intersection LOS in all
~ scenarios. The intersection of Sprague Avenue and University Road would drop from
LOS C with the existing 1997 network to LOS D with redeveloped 1997 network, and
the redeveloped 1999 transportation network; however, this is still acceptable.
With the present volumes provided by the Spokane County Engineers, the intersection of
Sprague road and University Road is at LOS C. The expansion of the University City
shopping center will drop that LOS to a D for the 1997 and 1999 scenario years. Once
again, the distinction must be made that the Highway Capacity Software analyses were
made with assumed intersection configurations. Spokane County Engineer design and
assessments of the intersection may well produce a configuration that would increase the
LOS. There should also be mention that the expanded University City trip generation
27
volumes are small compared to the volumes that are predicted to use this artenal to get
to Sprague Avenue. The LOS change due to shopping center expansion was just enough
to drop the borderline C to a D LOS. Again, LOS D is still acceptable.
Because the overall average intersection LOS remained within acceptable parameters for
all network scenanos, there is no requirement for a full traffic study based upon
intersection capacities.
Recommendations:
Building permit application process be allowed to proceed forward without further traffic
impact analysis
'
'
~
28
r
Appendix 1
1
1
~
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
TRAFFIC COUNTS SUMMARY AND 8/6/1997
' PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION
UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC ICOUNTS AT FIFTEEN MINUTE INTERVALS
,
ACCESS 1 ACCESS 2 ACCESS 3 ACCESS 4 ACCESS 5
TIME Total In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out
3 30 PM 29 ~ 13 ~ 16 15 ~ 5 ~ 10 2 ~ 1 ~ 1 10 ~ 5 ~ 5 2 ~ 1 ~ 1
3 45 PM 34 ~ 13 ~ 21 22 ~ 9 ~ 13 1~ 0 ~ 1 15 ~ 8~ 7 a 3 ~ 1 ~ 2
4 00 PM 23 ~ 5 ~ 18 20 ~ 7 ~ 13 4~ 0 ~ 4 13 ~ 9~ 4 2 ~ 0 ~ 2
4 15 PM 39 ~ 16 ~ 23 26 ~ 12 ~ 14 _ 5 ~ 1 ~ 4 14 ~ 7 ~ 7 5 ~ 2 ~ 3
4 30 PM 27 ~ 14 ~ 13 23 8 ~ 15 2 ~ 0 ~ 2 9 ~ 5 ~ 4 3~ 0 ~ 3
4 45 PM 22 ~ 5~ 17 29 14 ~ 15 2~ 2 ~ 0 5~ 1 ~ 4 2~ 1 ~ 1
5 00 PM 27 ~ 8~ 19 20 ~ 9 ~ 11 5 ~ 2 ~ 3 20 ~ 14 ( 6 3 ~ 2 ~ 1
5 15 PM 15 ~ 7 ~ s s ~ 3 ~ s 7 ~ o ~ 7 14 ~ s 5 ~ 1 ~ 4
530PM 16 ~ 4 ~ 12 14 ~ 4 10 3 ~ 1 ~ 2 10 ~ 6 I 4 5 ~ 2 ~ 3
5 45 PM 22 ~ 9 ~ 13 18 ~ 10 8 4 ~ 0~ 4 12 ~ 4 ~ 8 8 ~ 6~ 2
sooPnn 19 ~ s ~10 15 ~ 2 ~13 2 ~ o ~ 2 14 ~ 7 7 o ~ o ~ o
615PAA 14 I 4 I 10 12 ~ 7 I 5 3 ~ 1~ 2 12 ~ 9 I 3 5~ 3 ~ 2
,
ACCESS 6 ACCESS 7 ACCESS 8 ACCESS 9 ACCESS 10
TIME Total I In I Out Total ~ In I Out Total I In I Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out
' 334PM 30 ~ 14 ~ 16 ,10 ~ 5 ~ 5 7 ~ 2 ~ 5 12 ~ 10 ~ 2 18 ~ 7 ~ 11
3 45 PM 28 18 ~ 10 5 ~ 3 ~ 2 5 ~ 3~ 2 11 ~ 6 ~ 5 21 ~ 12 ~ 9
4 00 PM 24 13 ~ 11 9 I 4 ~ 5 6 ~ 2 I 4 11 ~ 7 I 4 24 ~ 8~ 16
' 415 PM 22 ~ 13 ~ 9 7 ~ 2 ~ 5, 4 ~ 3 ~ 1 9 8 ~ 1 26 ~ 10 ~ 16
4 30 PM 32 ~ 18 ~ 14 9 ~ 3 I 6 3~ 1 ~ 2 8 6 ~ 2 24 ~ S ~ 16
4 45 PM 13 ( 7 ~ 6 11 ~ 5 I 6 3 ~ 2 ~ 1 9 ~ 6 ~ 3 24 ~ 9 ~ 15
5 00 PM 15 I 13 ~ 2 10 I 3 ~ 7 3 ~ 1~ 2 13 I 11 ~ 2 36 ~ 10 ~ 26
515PM 19 ~ 13 ~ 6 6 ~ 3~ 3 3~ 1 ~ 2 7 ~ 5 2 25 ~ 14 ~ 11
5 30 PM 23 ~ 15 ~ 8 6~ 2~ 4 4 ~ 0 ~ 4 12 ~ 12 0 10 ~ S ~ 2
5 45 P M 20 ~ 11 ~ 9 10 ~ 5 ~ 5 8 I 6 I 2 15 ~ 13 ~ 2 _ 29 ~ 8~ 21
6 00 PM 23 ~ 10 ~ 13 _ 8 ~ 4~ 4 8 I 2 ~ 6 14 ~ 10 ~ 4 34 ~ 10 I 24
615PM 19 ~ 12 ~ 7 5 ~ 3~ 2 9 I 1 I 8 11 I 9 I 2 13 ~ 4 I 9.
~ ACCESS 11 U-CITY TOTALS Peak Hour Assesment. TIME Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Hourty Totals
3 30 PM 5 I 3 I 2 140 I 66 I 74 Peak Hour Penod Total In Out
~ 3 45 PM 5 ~ 3 ~ 2,150 ~ 76 74 3 30-4 30 PM 596 ~ 275 ~ 321
4 00 PM 6 2 ~ 4 142 ~ 57 85 3 45-4 45 PM 647 ~ 274 ~ 333
4 15 PM 7 2 5 164 ~ 76 ~ 88 4 00-5 00 PM 591 ~ 255 ~ 336
4 30 PM 11 I 2 9 151 ~ 65 ~ 86 4 15-5 15 PM 608 ~ 276 ~ 332 RESULTING PEAK HOUR
4 45 PM 14 ~ 5 ~ 9 134 I 57 ~ 77 4 30-5 30 PM 555 ~ 253 ~ 302
5 00 PM 7 5 ~ 2 _159 ~ 78 ~ 81 4 45-5 45 PM 511 ~ 244 ~ 267
5 15 PM 2 0~ 2_111 ~ 53 ~ 58 5 00-6 00 PM 530 ~ 263 ~ 267
5 30 P M 4~ 2 ~ 2 107 ~ 56 ( 51 5 15-6 15 P M 514 I 244 ~ 270
5 45 PM 7 I 4 I 3 153 I 76 I 77 5 30-6 30 PM 508 ~ 245 ~ 263
6 00 PM 6 ~ 5( 1 143 ~ 59 ~ 84
6 15 PM 2 I 1 1 105 I 54 ~ 51
~ Tot ~ 16591 773 I 886
29
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5 15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 81611991
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD WITH WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1996 ^ 1991 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2001 2010
ET 1376 1407 1439 1471 1504 1572 1642 1716 1794 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 117 122 128 134
F 17 18 19 20 20
EL 15 15 16 16 16
WT 1024 1047 1071 1095 1119 1170 1222 1277 1335 1396
WR 19 19 20 20 21 71 23 24 25 26
WL 63 64 66 67 69 _ 72 75 79 , 82 ~ 86
NT 34 35 36 36 37 39 41 42 44 46
NR 55 56 58 59 60 63 _ 66 69 72 75
NL 74 76 TT 79 81 _ 85 88 92 96 _ 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 59 61
SR 7 7 7 7 8 8 6 9 9 10
SL 37 38 39 40 40 42 44 46 48 Sd
, r TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR UALLEY COUPLET
-
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1999 L 2000 1 2002 2004 r 2006 1 2008 2010
ER 25 28 26 27 28 29 30 32 33
WL 18 18 19 19 20 21 ~ 22 23 24
NR 40 41 42 43 45 47 49 51 53
NL 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
F , < <
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET ,
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 L 2004 ~ 2006 1008 L 2010
ER 33 34 35 35 37 39 _ 40 42 44
WL 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
NR 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 _ 13
NL 45 46 47 48 50 53 55 57 60
< < < `
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSiTY CITY ACCESS A3 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET ,
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 2004 2006 2008 ~ 2010
ER 6 6 6 6 7 1 7 8 8
NR 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 , r <
30
~ ~ ~ r r~ r ~ ~ ~r w ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 (SPRAGUE AVE AND BALFOUR RD ) WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1997 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 L 1008 L 2010
ER 14 14 15 15 16 16 , 17 18 19
Vyl. ' 12 12 13 13 ~ 13 14 15 15 16
NT 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1
NR 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 17 17
NL 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 _ 9
ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
r TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A5 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VQLLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 L 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 1004 1 2006 200B L 2010 1
ER 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7
NR 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12
, r I
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 (SPRAGUE AVE. AND RAYMOND RD ) WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENT 1991 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22
WL 29 30 30 31 32 32 33 34 35
NT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NR 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23
NL 11 11 12 12 12 12 13 13 13
ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
< < TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A7 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTF 1991 r 1998 1999 2000 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ~
ER 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 17 17
NR 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 31 32
< < < < TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A8 WITH WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 1008 ~ 2010
ER 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9
NR 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8
, , < < 31
~ ~ ~ r~ ~ i■r ~■r ~r ~r ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ r r ~r ~ r
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND UNIVIERSITY ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
,
MOVEMENTI 1996 1 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ET 1174 1199 1225 1251 1278 1332 1389 1449 1511 1514
ER 131 134 137 140 143 149 155 162 169 176
EL 80 82 83 85 87 , 91 _ 95 99 103 107
YVT 636 ~ 854 872 891 910 949 989 1032 1076 1121
WR 59 60 62 63 64 67 70 73 76 79
WL 167 171 174 178 ~ 182 190 198 206 215 224
NT 131 134 137 140 143 149 155 162 169 176
NR 85 87 89 91 93 96 101 165 169 114
NL 143 146 149 152 156 162 169 176 184 192
ST 196 200 204 209 213 222 232 242 252 263
S R 69 70 72 74 75 78 82 85 89 93
SL 154 157 161 164 168 175 182 190 198 207
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 L 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 1
ER 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11
SL 32 33 r 33 34 36 37 39 41 43
< < TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A10 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1991 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 2002 1 1004 ~ 2006 2006 2010 ~
ER 73 75 76 78 82 85 89 93 97
NL 29 30 30 31 32 34 35 37 39
SR 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11
, r r TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
ET 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8
ER 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12
EL 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
WT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NL 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
SR 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
~ , 32
~ ~ ~ ~r r~ ~ ~■r ir ir ~r ~ ~ ~ ~r ~r r ~ r ~
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5.15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 816l1997
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1996 f-RED 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 1 2000 1 2002 2004 1 2006 1 2007 ~ 2010
ET 1376 1728 1767 1807 1847 1930 2017 2108 2203 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 _ 117 122 127 134
EL 15 15 16 16 16 17 18 19 20 20
V1►T 1024 1293 1322 1352 1382 1444 1509 1577 1648 1396
WR 19 24 25 25 26 27 28 , 29 31 26
WL 63 76 78 79 81 85 89 93 97 86
NT 34 35 36 36 37 39 41 42 44 46
NR 55 70 72 73 75 78 82 85 89 75
NL 74 76 77 19 81 85 E 88 92 96 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 59 61
SR 7 7 7 1 8 B 8 9 9 10
SL 37 41 42 43 44 46 48 50 52 50
r MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 REO 1997 f- 1998 1 1999 r 2000 1002 L 2004 ~ 2006 1 2008 1 2010 ~
ER 25 70 72 73 75 78 82 85 89 93
WL 18 50 52 53 54 56 a 59 61 64 67
NR 40 112 115 117 120 125 131 137 143 149
NL 31 87 89 91 93 97 101 106 111 116
, r MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTF 1997 1 RED 1997 1 1998 1 1999 ~ 2000 L 2002 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 33 92 94 97 99 _ 103 108 113 118 123
WL 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
NR 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 _ 36 37
NL 45 126 129 132 135 141 147 154 161 168
, r MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A3 WITHOUT UNNERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 RED.1997 1998 1 1999 1 2000 L 2002 1 2004 2006 2008 2010
ER 6 il 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 22
NR 9 25 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34
, 33
~ ~r ~ r rr rr ~ ~r ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r r ir■~ ~r ~
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A4 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 L 1999 L 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 14 39 40 41 42 44 46 48 50 52
yyL 12 34 34 35 36 38 39 41 43 45
NT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NR 13 36 37 38 39 _ 41 42 44 _ 46 48
NL 7 20 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A5 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET .
MOVEMENT~ 1997 ~ RED 1991 ~ 1998 1999 2000 2002 2004 2006 L 2008 2010
ER 5 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 18 19
NR 9 25 26 26 27 26 29 31 32 34
1 , MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A6 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~RED 1991 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010 ER 18 50 52 53 54 56 _ 59 61 64 , 67
WL 29 81 83 85 87 91 95 99 _ 104 108
NT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NR 19 53 54 56 57 59 62 65 68 71
NL 11 31 31 32 33 _ 34 36 38 39 41
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
, , .
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A7 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT~ 1997 LRED 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 2006 L 2008 ~ 2010 ER 13 36 37 38 39 41 42 44 46 48
NR 24 61 69 70 72 75 78 82 86 90
r , f r r .
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A8 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 L 2008 1 2010 ER 7 20 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
NR fi 17 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 22
, r 34
i■r r r r r~r ~~~~r ~~r ~~r ~■r ~r tr r r
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND UNIVIERSITY ROAD WITN EXISTING LAYOUT
MOUEMENTI 1996 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ET 1174 1509 1541 1574 1608 1677 1749 _ 1823 1901 1574
ER 131 167 171 ' 174 178 186 194 202 210 176
EL BO 104 106 106 111 116 121 , 126 131 107
yVT 836 991 1012 1034 1056 1101 1148 1197 1249 1121
WR 59 59 60 62 63 ~ 66 68 11 74 79
WL 167 ' 196 200 204 a 2(}9 218 227 237 247 , 224
NT 131 141 144 147 150 157 163 170 _ 178 176
NR 85 90 92 94 96 100 104 109 , 113 114
NL 143 204 208 213 217 227 236 247 257 192
ST 196 247 252 258 263 274 286 298 311 263
SR 69 83 65 87 88 92 96 100 105 93
SL 154 157 161 164 168 175 182 190 198 207
, MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A9 WITHOUT UNNERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2006 ~ 2010 ~
ER 8 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
SL 32 90 92 94 96 100 105 109 114 119
, < < r
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A10 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~ REO 1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 2002 2004 1 2006 2008 L 2010
ER 73 204 209 214 219 228 239 249 261 272
NL 29 81 83 85 87 91 95 99 104 108
SR 6 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
< < MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A11 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 fRED 1997 ~ 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2001 2004 1 2006 2008 2010
ET 6 18 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24
ER 9 ~ 25 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34
EL 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
WT 1 4 4 4 _ 4 4 5 _ 5 5 _ 5
NL 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
SR 4 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15
, , < < 35
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5*15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 8I611997
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD W1TH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1996 1 RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 L 2000 ~ 2002 C 2004 1 2006 1 2001 1 2010 ~
ET 1376 1760 1800 1840 1881 1966 2055 2147 2244 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 117 122 128 134
EL 15 15 16 16 16 _ 17 18 19 _ 20 20
VYT 1024 1318 1348 1378 1409 1472 1539 1608 1680 1396
WR 19 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 32 _ 26
WL 63 76 80 82 83 87 _ 91 95 99 86
NT ~ 34 35 36 36 ~ 37 39 41 42 44 46
NR 55 75 77 78 80 84 88 91 96 75
NL 74 76 77 79 81 85 88 92 96 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 59 61
SR 7 7 7 7 8 8 B 9 9 10
SL 37 44 45 46 47 49 51 54 SS 50
r MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS At WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 RED 1997 L 1998 1999 1 2000 ~ 2002 2004 L 1006 1 2006 ~ 2010
ER 25 18 79 81 63 87 90 95 99 103
WL 18 56 57 58 60 62 65 68 71 74
NR 40 124 127 130 133 139 145 151 158 165
NL 31 96 98 100 103 107 112 117 123 128
, MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2,112 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1991 f-RED 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
ER 33 102 105 107 109 114 119 _ 125 130 136
WL 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 _ 40 41
NR 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
NL 45 140 143 146 149 156 163 170 178 186
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A3 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTJ 1997 ~ RED.1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 1000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 2008 2010
ER 6 19 19 19 20 21 71 23 24 25
NR 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37 ,
< < , 36
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANOED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTJ 1991 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 L 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010
ER 14 43 44 45 46 48 51 53 55 58
WL 12 37 38 39 40 42 43 45 47 50
NT 1 4 4 4 _ 4 _ 4 5 5 5 5
NR 13 40 41 42 43 45 47 49 51 54
NL 7 22 22 23 23 24 25 26 28 29
ST 1 4 4 4 4 ~ 4 5 5 5 5
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A5 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTL 1997 1 RED 1997 ~ 1996 1 1999 1 2000 L 2002 1 2004 ~ 2006 2008 2010 ~
ER 5 16 16 16 17 17 18 19 20 21
NR 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 31
, < < I r I
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 REO 1997 1 1998 C 1999 1 2000 r 2002 1 2004 1 2006 2008 1010 ~
ER 18 56 57 58 60 62 65 68 71 14
WL 29 90 92 94 96 100 105 110 115 120
NT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NR 19 59 60 62 63 66 69 72 75 78
NL 11 34 35 36 36 36 40 42 43 45
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
r MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A7 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTJ 1997 RE0.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 ~ 2008 1 2010
ER 13 40 41 42 43 45 47 49 51 54
NR 24 74 ~ 76 78 80 83 87 91 95 99
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A8 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTF 1997 LRED 1991 ~ 1998 1 1999 1 1000 L 2002 F 2004 1 2006 2008 2010
ER 7 71 22 23 23 24 25 26 28 29
NR 6 19 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
, ~ 37
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND UNIVIERSITY ROAD W1TN EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENT~ 1996 ~ REO 1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 1004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 1010 ~
ET 1174 1542 1575 1649 1643 1713 1787 1863 1943 1574
ER 131 110 174 177 181 189 197 205 214 176
EL 80 105 107 110 ' 112 117 122 127 , 132 107
WT a 836 1007 1029 1051 1073 1119 1167 1217 1269 1121
WR 59 59 60 62 63 66 68 71 74 79
WL 167 199 203 208 212 221 231 240 251 224
NT 131 142 145 148 151 158 165 172 179 176
NR 85 91 93 95 97 101 105 110 115 114
NL 143 208 212 217 222 231 241 251 262 192
ST 196 252 257 263 269 280 292 305 318 263
SR 69 64 86 88 90 93 97 102 106 93
SL 154 157 161 164 168 175 182 190 198 207
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
~
MOVEMENTJ 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1996 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 2008 2010
ER 8 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33
SL ~ 32 99 101 104 106 111 116 121 126 132
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY C1TY ACCESS A10 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 RED 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 1006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ~
ER 73 226 231 237 242 253 264 276 288 301
NL 29 90 92 94 96 100 105 110 115 120
SR 8 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33
MAXIMUM TRQFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 RED 1991 ~ 1996 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 1004 ~ 1006 ~ 1008 ~ 2010 ET 6 18 18 19 19 20 21 71 23 24
ER 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 31
E L 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
V1fT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NL 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
SR 4 12 13 13 13 14 14 15 16 17
38
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15a:15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 8I6h997
EXPANOED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTJ 1997 1 1998 1 1999 L 2000 ~ 2002 L 2004 1 2006 1 1008 1 2010 WT 1277 1315 1354 1394 1417 1565 1658 1756 1860
WR 22 23 23 24 26 28 29 31 33
WL 79 84 90 ~ 95 ~ 108 122 138 156 148
NT 49 50 51 52 55 57 60 62 65
NL 74 18 83 88 89 111 124 139 164
ST 82 84 86 88 92 96 100 105 111
SR 7 7 8 8 B 9 10 10 11
F r
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CiTY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE AND DARTMOUTH RD ) WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT RED.1997 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 1 2008 L 2010 WL 75 71 19 81 85 89 93 98 103
NL 103 106 108 111 116 122 128 135 142
I r EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITN VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 2002 1 2004 1 2006 1 2008 1 2010 1
yyL 47 48 49 51 53 SG 59 62 65
NL 65 67 68 70 73 71 81 85 89
F r I , I
EXPANDED UNNERSITY CITY TRAFFiC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A3 WiTH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND BALFOUR RD.) W1TH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI REO 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 2008 2010
WL 31 32 , 33 33 35 _ 37 _ 39 41 43
NT 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
NL 47 48 49 51 53 56 59 62 65
ST 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7
, , , , , 39
EXPANDED UNNERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE, AND RAYMOND RD ) WITH VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010
WL 24 ~ 25 25 26 27 28 30 31 33
NT 4 ~ 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 S
NL 35 ~ 36 37 38 40 42 44 46 48
ST 4 I 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
, EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS AS WITH VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
WL 27 28 28 29 31 32 34 35 37
NL 39 40 41 42 44 46 49 51 54
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AUE. AND UNIVIERSITY RD WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTJ 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
WT 1006 1035 1064 1094 1157 1223 1293 1366 1233
WR 59 60 62 63 65 68 71 74 79
WL 224 229 234 238 _ 248 259 270 281 _ 714
NT ' 404 412 421 430 448 467 486 507 283
NR 1186 1211 1236 1262 1315 1371 1428 1488 _ 1216
NL 403 411 420 429 447 466 485 SOfi 281
ST 263 269 274 280 292 304 317 334 263
SR 82 84 87 89 94 99 105 111 102
SL 154 157 161 164 171 178 185 193 207
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 1 1998 1999 2000 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 1010 ~
ER 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
SR 94 96 99 101 106 112 117 123 129
EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRI4FFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A7 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTJ RED.1997 ~ 1996 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010 ER 222 228 233 239 251 264 277 291 305
NL 116 119 122 125 131 138 145 152 159
SR 25 26 26 27 28 30 31 33 34
, , 40
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A8 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT RED.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 i 2002 ~ 2004 2006 2008 ~ 2010 ~
ER 25 26 26 27 28 30 31 33 34
S R 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 17 18
, , . EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SECOND AVE AND UNIVIERSITY RD. WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED 1997 f 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 1008 2010
ER 609 624 640 657 690 725 762 801 667
EL 1133 1170 1208 1247 1328 1414 1506 1604 1360
NT 483 494 505 517 541 566 592 619 482
ST 611 625 639 654 684 716 749 783 487
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RE0.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
EL 49 SO 51 53 55 58 61 64 67
SL 40 41 42 43 45 47 50 52 55
EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A10 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT~ 130 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 1002 ~ 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
EL 86 88 90 93 97 102 107 113 118
SL 94 96 99 101 106 112 117 123 129
r I I I
EXPANDED UNIVERSiTY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
EL 120 123 126 129 136 142 150 157 165
SL 130 133 137 140 147 154 162 170 179
r EXPANOEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A12 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND DARTMOUTH RD ) WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT REQ,1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
EL 146 150 154 157 165 174 183 192 667
SL 135 138 141 145 151 158 165 173 487
, , , .
41
EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SECOND AVE. AND FARR RD. WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1991 1 1998 ~ 1999 i 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 1 2008 L 2010
ET 1840 1668 1938 1988 2093 2202 2318 2439 1969
ER 98 101 104 107 114 120 128 135 147
EL 15 17 19 22 27 34 43 54 76
NT 108 110 113 116 121 127 132 138 _ 147
NR 75 17 79 82 86 91 97 102 83
ST 108 110 113 116 121 121 132 138 147
SL 46 50 54 58 68 79 92 107 109
r 42
endiX 2
App
~
■
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&FARR.HC9
, Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: COUNTS TAKEN 6-11-96 (P.M. PEAK)
' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1376 98 63 1024 19 74 34 55 37 45 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds , Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
, NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 7.2 B
TR 3180 5530 0.554 0.575 7.0 B
WB L 111 1770 0.615 0.063 30.3 D 7.3 B
TR 3203 5571 0.389 0.575 6.1 B
~ NB LTR 332 1328 0.533 0.250 18.1 C 18.1 C
SB LTR 335 1341 0.289 0.250 15.8 C 15.8 C
Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.553
'
43
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
~ Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FAR2.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: PRE. 1997 VOL. FOR UNIVERSITY C. WITHOUT REDEVELOP. OR COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1407 100 64 1047 19 76 35 56 38 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
,
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
, EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
' Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 7.2 B
TR 3180 5530 0.567 0.575 7.1 B
WB L 111 1770 0.633 0.063 31.2 D 7.4 B
TR 3203 5571 0.398 0.575 6.1 B
~ NB LTR 330 1321 0.551 0.250 18.4 C 18.4 C
SB LTR 333 1332 0.297 0.250 15.9 C 15.9 C
Intersection Delay = 8.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.567
44
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIIMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI2.HC9
I Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 VOULMES FOR UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT REDEVELOP. OR COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 82 1199 134 171 854 60 146 134 87 157 200 70
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
~ WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 7.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c q/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 88 1770 0.983 0.050 92.2 F 19.3 C
TR 2064 5504 0.756 0.375 15.3 C
WB L 243 1770 0.748 0.138 29.5 D 12.3 B
TR 2558 5530 0.418 0.463 9.3 B
~ NB L 221 1770 0.701 0.125 28.1 D 21.5 C
TR 745 3508 0.333 0.213 17.3 C
SB L 221 1770 0.755 0.125 31.1 D 22.5 C
TR 761 3580 0.396 0.213 17.7 C
Intersection Delay = 17.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.665
~
45
~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUrIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FAR4.HC9
, Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: MAX. 1997 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CITY(NO COUPLET)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1728 100 76 1293 24 76 35 70 41 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 8.3 B
TR 3189 5546 0.685 0.575 8.1 B
WB L 111 1770 0.750 0.063 39.8 D 8.3 B
TR 3203 5571 0.491 0.575 6.6 B
t NB LTR 330 1318 0.598 0.250 19.2 C 19.2 C
SB LTR 322 1287 0.320 0.250 16.0 C 16.0 C
Intersection Delay = 9.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.665
~
46
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
~ Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI4.HC9
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: MAX. 1997 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CITY(NO COUPLET)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
, Volumes 104 1509 167 196 991 59 204 141 90 157 247 83
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.016 0.062 96.3 F 29.0 D
TR 2039 5504 0.962 0.370 25.2 D
WB L 262 1770 0.797 0.148 32.2 D 13.3 B
TR 2530 5538 0.486 0.457 10.0 B
, NB L 219 1770 0.993 0.123 67.7 F 40.6 E
TR 736 3508 0.350 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.764 0.123 32.1 D 22.8 C
1 TR 753 3586 0.490 0.210 18.6 C
Intersection Delay = 24.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.822
a7
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARI0.HC9
, Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1760 100 78 1318 25 76 35 75 44 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 8.4 B
TR 3189 5546 0.697 0.575 8.3 B
WB L 111 1770 0.768 0.063 41.7 E 8.4 B
TR 3203 5571 0.501 0.575 6.7 B
, NB LTR 329 1316 0.617 0.250 19.6 C 19.6 C
SB LTR 314 1255 0.338 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
Intersection Delay = 9.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.680
48
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI10.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
, Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 105 1542 170 199 1007 59 208 142 91 157 252 84
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.025 0.062 99.7 F 32.1 D
TR 2039 5504 0.983 0.370 28.3 D
WB L 262 1770 0.808 0.148 33.1 D 13.4 B
TR 2530 5538 0.493 0.457 10.1 B
NB L 219 1770 1.011 0.123 73.1 F 43.2 E
, TR 736 3508 0.353 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.764 0.123 32.1 D 22.8 C
TR 753 3586 0.498 0.210 18.7 C
Intersection Delay = 26.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.837
'
49
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
, Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FAR8.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 VOL. FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 16 1807 105 79 1352 25 79 36 73 43 48 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
' WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinatLon order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.6 B
TR 3189 5546 0.717 0.575 8.5 B
WB L 111 1770 0.777 0.063 42.7 E 8.5 B
TR 3203 5571 0.514 0.575 6.7 B
/ NB LTR 327 1307 0.624 0.250 19.8 C 19.8 C
SB LTR 317 1267 0.338 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
Intersection Delay = 9.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.695
,
50
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION StTNIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPR.AGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI5.HC9
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: MAX. 1999 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CITY(NO COUPLET)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 108 1574 174 204 1034 62 213 147 94 164 258 87
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
~ EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.053 0.062 110.5 F 36.6 D
TR 2039 5504 1.003 0.370 32.5 D
WB L 262 1770 0.828 0.148 34.8 D 13.7 B
TR 2530 5538 0.507 0.457 10.2 B
' NB L 219 1770 1.039 0.123 82.2 F 47.3 E
TR 736 3508 0.365 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.796 0.123 34.6 D 23.7 C
TR 753 3586 0.512 0.210 18.8 C
Intersection Delay = 28.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.857
51
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARI2.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 16 1840 105 82 1378 26 79 36 78 46 48 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.8 B
TR 3189 5546 0.729 0.575 8.6 B
WB L 111 1770 0.805 0.063 46.0 E 8.8 B
TR 3203 5571 0.524 0.575 6.8 B
' NB LTR 326 1304 0.644 0.250 20.3 C 20.3 C
SB LTR 308 1233 0.357 0.250 16.3 C 16.3 C
Intersection Delay = 9.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.710
52
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SLJNIIKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNIA.HC9
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 110 1609 177 208 1051 62 217 148 95 164 263 88
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 10.0A 3.OA 30.OA Green 10.0A 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 85 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 146 1770 0.803 0.082 42.5 E 43.8 E
TR 2007 5504 1.041 0.365 43.9 E
WB L 292 1770 0.758 0.165 29.3 D 13.8 B
TR 2476 5538 0.526 0.447 11.1 B
' NB L 229 1770 1.008 0.129 72.1 F 43.6 E
TR 702 3508 0.386 0.200 19.2 C
SB L 229 1770 0.760 0.129 32.3 D 24.1 C
TR 717 3586 0.548 0.200 20.4 C
Intersection Delay = 31.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.867
53
1
,
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlMARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SP&FA.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment : 1~1997 'UNIVERSITY, CITY_ WITH COUPLET, _ NO;EXPfANSION ;
' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1<
Volumes 63 1024 63 74 49 82 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
' EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
~ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 5877 9219 0.234 0.637 4.0 A 4.0 A
NB LT 428 1490 0.310 0.287 14.5 B 14.5 B
SB TR 476 1656 0.204 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS =~B ~
' Lost Time/Cycle, L=___6_0 sec___Critical v/c(x) = 0.258
'
54
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UNIN.HC9
, Area Type:, Other 8-11-97,_.8/fi/_97
Comment :~-1997 UNIVERSITY 'CITY WITH COUPLET, NO_-.EXPMSIOIJ
Eastbound Westbound Nortnbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 167 836 59 143 131 85 154 196 69
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.OA Green 42.OA lO.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 1946 9158 0.639 0.213 22.3 C 22.3 C
NB L 951 1770 0.157 0.538 7.1 B 7.1 B
LTR 975 1814 0.176 0.538 7.2 B
R 851 1583 0.071 0.538 6.8 B
SB L 243 1770 0.674 0.138 29.8 D 27.4 D
' TR 492 3580 0.601 0.138 26.1 D
-NCl
Intersection Delay = 20.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS _
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.364
~
~
55
~ .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIIKARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
1 Center_For_Microcomputers-In-Transportation
-
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SE&UN.HC9
j Area Type^:__ Other . 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment :,1997 UNIVERSITY, CITY-WITH COUPLET, NO ` EXPANSION
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Volumes 902 483 359 363
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
~ NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
~ Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 2035 3539 0.496 0.575 6.7 B 6.4 B
R 1821 3167 0.326 0.575 5.8 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.314 0.350 12.3 B 12.3 B
SB T 1304 3725 0.318 0.350 12.3 B 12.3 B
~ Intersection Delay = 8.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS =*B'
L o s t T i m e/ C y c l e, L 6.0 s e c C r i t i c a l v/ c( x) = 0.429
56
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&FAAA.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97-8/6/97,.._ _
Comment:-1997 UNIVERSITY.CITY~WITH COUPLET, NO EXPANSIONI
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 4 < 1< > 1
Volumes 15 1376 98 108 55 37 108
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
~ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 4606 7369 0.387 0.625 4.8 A 4.8 A
NB TR 477 1591 0.371 0.300 14.5 B 14.5 B
SB LT 487 1624 0.322 0.300 14.2 B 14.2 B
Intersection Delay = 6.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = Be
~ Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.382
j
57
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Si,JMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
~ Center_For_Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARR.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1<
Volumes 79 1277 22 74 49 82 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 5903 9259 0.279 0.637 4.1 A 4.1 A
NB LT 428 1490 0.310 0.287 14.5 B 14.5 B
SB TR 476 1656 0.204 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
~ Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.289
~
58
t
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNiMARY Version 2.4 08-19-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UNIN.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
~ Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 224 1006 59 403 404 1186 154 263 82
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.OA Green 42.OA lO.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 1949 9170 0.774 0.213 24.0 C 24.0 C
NB L 951 1770 0.441 0.538 8.7 B 25.6 D
LTR 928 1726 0.922 0.538 23.2 C
R 851 1583 0.994 0.538 36.4 D
SB L 243 1770 0.674 0.138 29.8 D 30.4 D
~ TR 494 3593 0.779 0.138 30.7 D
Intersection Delay - 25.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS _ D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.908
1
59
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SLTNIlMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&UNI.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Volumes 1133 609 483 611
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 2035 3539 0.624 0.575 7.7 B 7.2 B
R 1821 3167 0.411 0.575 6.2 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.423 0.350 13.0 B 13.0 B
SB T 1304 3725 0.535 0.350 13.8 B 13.8 B
Intersection Delay = 9.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.590
'
60
HCM: SIGNAL3ZED TNTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-15-1997
Center Far MicrocornPuters In Transportation
Streets : ( E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR RQPiD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Narne: SEC&FARRS.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8 f6f97
CoilL11Lent■ 1997 i:r11PANDED U1VIVJ.JRSI1 S 411 ,i YY1TH L.rLUPlJEl
Eastbound Westbound Northbvund Svuthbound
L T R L 'I' R L T R L T R
Na. Lanes > 4 < 1 ~ ~ 1
Volumes 15 1840 98 108 TS 46 108
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR V'a].s 0 0 0
Lbst `I'ime 3.00 3.40 3.00 3,00 3.00 3,00 3,04
Sigrxal Opex`ations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
4JS Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
~ Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yel lvwfAR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase cambinatLon order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
~ Lane Group: Adj Sat Vfc gJC Approach:
mvmts Cap Flow Ratia Ratia Delay LoS oelay LOS
ES LTR 4620 7392 0.505 0,625 5.4 B 5.4 B
NB TR 472 1573 0.422 0.300 14.9 B 14.9 B
SB LT 471 1569 0.355 0,300 14.4 B 14.4 S
In~ersection Delay = 6.6 sec f veh Intersection LOS =B
~ Last Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Crltical v/c(x) _0.478
61
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
I Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARR.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1<
Volumes 90 1354 23 83 51 86 8
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 5901 9257 0.297 0.637 4.2 A 4.2 A
NB LT 422 1468 0.344 0.287 14.8 B 14.8 B
SB TR 476 1654 0.214 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
~ Lost Time/Cycle, L=6_0 secCritical v/c(x) = 0.312
62
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-20-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UNAA.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 234 1064 62 420 421 1236 161 274 87
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.OA Green 42.OA 10.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 1948 9165 0.817 0.213 21.4 C 21.4 C
NB L 951 1770 0.460 0.538 7.6 B 30.3 D
LTR 927 1725 0.961 0.538 26.7 D
R 851 1583 1.035 0.538 45.2 E
SB L 243 1770 0.703 0.138 27.2 D 28.3 D
, TR 494 3591 0.816 0.138 28.8 D
Intersection Delay - 26.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS _ D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.949
~
63
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&UNAA.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Volumes 1208 640 505 639
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 2035 3539 0.664 0.575 8.1 B 7.5 B
R 1821 3167 0.432 0.575 6.3 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.442 0.350 13.1 B 13.1 B
SB T 1304 3725 09560 09350 14.0 B 14.0 B
~ Intersection Delay = 9.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) 0.625
64
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&FAAA.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
, Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 4 < 1< > 1
Volumes 19 1938 104 113 79 54 113
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Riqht wB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 4620 7392 0.534 0.625 5.5 B 5.5 B
NB TR 472 1573 0.443 0.300 15.1 C 15.1 C
SB LT 463 1544 0.393 0.300 14.6 B 14.6 B
Intersection Delay = 6.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.504
'
~
~
65
~
Glossary
Arterial Signalized street that is primarily used by commuting traffic Arterials usually
allow access to adjacent facilities and roads
Delay: The additional travel time experienced by a traveler due to a transportatlon
situation Can be used to quantify levels of service
Demand Volume or Demand The traffic volume needed to reasonably accommodated
vehicle or pedestrian flow
Capacity The maximum rate of vehicle or pedestnan flow that a traffic facility or lane
segment can be expected to handle in a specified time frame
Gross Leasible Area(GLA): Gross Leasible Area is all of the total floor area, usually
measured in square feet, that is designed for tenant occupancy and client use(Tnp
Generation, 1991).
'
I. T.E. Trip Generah'on or Trip Generation Reference(1991) Nationally accepted
compilation of traffic counts, surveys, and historical data that give a valid account of
land uses based upon factors such as gross leasable area, number of employees,
occupied rooms, etc. This is the fifth edition available by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers from 1991.
Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition(1994): Reference manual that presents
operational, design, and planning capacity analysis for a broad range of transportation
facilities. This manual is a nationally accepted manual on transportation planning and
design.
66
Levels of Service(LOS): A qualitative measure used to descnbe the operational
conditions of a traffic facility. Usually rate by LOS A-F, with A being the most
favorable rating, and F being the most unfavorable rating.
Peak hour: The hour or hours in a day when traffic has reached the maximum,
countable volume. A.M. and P.M. peak hours are usually the morning and evening
rush hour. Peak generator is the highest volume that a development or operating
business will have in one hour.
Phase: The part of a signal cycle allocated to a specific traffic movement of
combination of traffic movements.
Rate of Flow or Flow Rate: The equivalent hourly rate that vehicle or pedestrian
volumes can be moved past in a specified location or segment.
Remote Pad: A facility or structure accountable for study, but not attached to the
main facility or structure being studied. For University City, this would include retail
stores within the property confines of the development(i.e. fast food, banks, etc.)
Trip Generation: The predicted traffic volumes that a development or facility is
expected to generate. The volume is usually given in passenger cars per hour per
lane(pcphpl). Maximum trip generation refers to the maximum volumes that is
expected to be produced by a facility.
Trip Distribution: The expected or anticipated directional flow allocation of observed
or predicted traffic volumes within the transportation network being observed or
designed.
Threshold Study or Threshold Anatysis: A report that venfies that a full traffic
study is not warranted for a project or development. A threshold analysis must verify
' that a project or development will not:
1. Adversely modify the existing transportation network;
2. Effect or the intersection level of service or lower the level of service below an
~ acceptable level; and
3. Increase the demand on the transportation network by more than 5% of existing
capacity.
Valley Couplet: Planned transportation network that will renovate Sprague Avenue
and construct new Second Avenue so that they relieve the capacity between downtown
Spokane and the Spokane Valley.
V/C Ratio: The Volume/Capacity ratio is used to describe the demand flow rate to
capacity for a traffic facility. Can be used to categonze levels of service.
67
~ ~ ' ~ ±
~
,
~ ~ .
, ~ ` ! ` , •
~
~ • ~ . 1 C. I ~
1 ~ ' •~Y.~..~.f~-1.M~
~ ~ "~+r~' wrw w• .
.~'aL~ir 'r' ' • , ! ~ '
- . ~ i I ~ ~ L• ~
I 1 LZ ' ~
,
~ ~ I I
. rj
, . - . ~ ~ 0 I 2. ~ . _ _ : ~ cj • ~ ~ ~L ~ ~ ~ i ~ _ ~ ,..,f _ . r- ~
1, , I • ; ~ ,
r~ I ; I ' ; : : ; •
~ I
~
~ .
~
1 1KNvv ~ ~ • ~ l
r~ j ,C a~V 8 38
E~'P i 6800
~ 479 114 60i ~ P,d ~2688
~ ~ ~r8~
~ _
~ 777 ~ r~ ~
, ~
d
r ~ 4 ~
1 ~
r : ~ n
~
r ' ~'6 _
~ ,.r -
r
:
,
~ aa5
96i ~ 1
6613 ~
7 --r 42
264?.~ , ~ 5929 1 82 Shannan Ave ~
ve ~ s ~ • -
~ 29ia~ ~ ~3 Mc~n~°m~rY ~ont9a~,~rY p~ . -
,A 38 00 f
a 858d ~ a498 r~ 5fi56
31857 - K 9~2~ -
~ 4A ~~x ve 6 r'g4 ~ r 2650U ~va
A ~
? µ~ssio A015
56 34259 ► _
92 499 r 3 ~
~s ~ i7 7484 ~
~~S=y~n ! 42a0' _
82 7 d ~
2 099 -
n ABi~ ~ ~625
22 J 5 561688 ~ ~ ~ _
a► pv
9A9~ Broed*te
~ p
° n 5 8 i 669 ('~`~8b 6205 L
w ~ - 3 10 ' J.~~~ c,
~ o Vs]
~ ~ 665 ~pQ67 ~ -
a 6298
ii6 a ~ i s
12 A7 9 '
g 65 ~,31 1023 8 5 g 1 92
Av ii ? ?i9 2 6:
2 5 -n
465 i23 9 S! 7 ~5 ~ 2A434 Sp~a9~e ~ve
7 ~ ~ 4 ~39 ~ ~d~' v ,
26828 70
n
9 r 6Q,4 1 t ~ a ~
~~t A8 ~ 2 i968 32 52 A 28926 ~p75 ~ 2A 4th Ave
307 8 25788 S38i5 q53
1 ~ ~ ~ 2753
A4 Sp~ ~~e I~,ve 252 ~055 ~ 1925
~ ~ 6q ~
i57~ ~th Ave 2149 ~A800 ~
i 939 ~
3220a . 58q ~ leoe ~,892
' ~ i
8 ~vt~ ~
~a2oo
3 ~ 3 872d ~ '
16
50 ~ ~ ~2T00 ~ , 2g21
v . ~
n 56~ -
~ 7 21 3 ~ es
-t
-ist J 65ae ~
1 1 4 ~
45fi 86 d~ ~
077
~ 51908 ~
5792''1~-e-
~ ~ 4i5 2504 r
, \ th A~
- 13' 35 2q h AY qg~4 -
~ 5
9°' 2 0
A
~ _
Y
g ~ 4~37
4 ~ nd ~ 4 5 i 69
~ 37
~
~
1 ` a2 w u
0
34i ~ n
` ~ ~7 ~
66 ~ -
ci
. 2 17
R~ 9 4 2
0 3581
yU ~ ~ 389
~ ~ 781 12iA
7har e Ad
230 ~ ~ 637 ~
,
fii
44th ~Ve ~
~ 13 ~ ~
. ~ 1 . J , l~-
.
' ^ =
t~~. • ~
. 1 u
~t 'a a i ~~i~ ~
~ •s ~ ~ I
iV39 ~ ; .
„ . J •
. _ . .
7 ~
~
♦-M.N..a:si'^•.w=lrr.ur~. =v:.i:...~: ...~..L _ _
j; ~i1 't~ ~~5~ a • • f I~ ~
S • .
)`~1 vV~f~t ~ •
~i ~v• f v L' ~9 !
• 1 .~nV . "I :i' r ~ ~
f
UNIVERSITY CITY MALL
Spokane, Washington
sy
TRAFFIC 1 M PACT STU DY
~ Prepared for
Winvest Development Corp.
Prepared by ~
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC.
5808 Lake Washington Bivd., N.E. -
Suite 200
Kirkiand, Washington 98033 ~
(206) 827-1300
June 1989
~
~
. • ' ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe ~
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODQLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS
Trip Generation 1
Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
~ Background Growth 3
~ ImpactAnalysis 3
. EXISTING CONDITlONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
~ TRAFFIC IMPACTS ~
~ 1991 Weekday P.M. Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
. 1991 Saturday Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
. MITIGAT(ON
' 1991 Weekday P.M. Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1991 Saturday Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
J
~ APPENDIX - Level of Service Concept
i
, - -
_ * ~ • . - -
, •
FtGURE5 - Paoe
- 7 Site Vicinrty Nfap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 Ex€sting Average Daily Traffic at Nlajor Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B
4 1989 P.M. Peak Hol.lf TUrniClg Mailement5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5 1991 Project PW, Peak Hour Tr`rp Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
~ 6 1991 P.M. Peak Hour Turning Mavernents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
_ 7 1991 Saturday Peak Haur Turning N1ovements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
.
4
~
~ •
~
A
~
~ TABLES ' Pa4e
. rt lntersection Level of Service Sumrnafy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
~ 2 Trip Generation Estima#es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
, -
a ~
~
~
ii
. ,
. .
- INTRODUCTION
Tlie University City Mall is a regional mail located in the block bounded by Sprague
Avenue, Universiry Road, Second Avenue, and Dartmouth Road in the Dishman district
of urbanized Spokane County (figure 1). The existing mall has approximately 421,000
square feet of retail space. The proposed renovation of the site includes demolition of
the majority of the existing retail area and expansion of the mall to a total leasable floor
. area of 889,700 square feet by August 1991.
The proposed layout for the mall will include 7 access driveways: 4 driveways on
Sprague Avenue and one driveway each on University Road, Second Avenue, and
Walnut Road. The new mall will also have 3 on-site parking structures. Two 5-level
= parking structures will be constructed, each accommodating roughiy 1,200 cars, one
' located on the west side of the site and the other along University Road to the east.
The third parking structure will be located on the south side of the site along Second
, Avenue and will accommodate roughly 670 cars. In addition, there will be 1,200
~ surface parking spaces surrounding the mall.
This siudy identifies the traffic impacts associated with the renovation and expansion of
. the mall and determines what road improvements will be necessary to mitigate any
significant adverse impacts. The guidelines for evaluating the traffic impacts were
: developed from meetings with Spokane County's traffic engineering staff.
METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS
; Trip Generation
; The trips generated by the development were based on rates from the ITE Trip
' Generation Manual, 4th edition. The trips rates are based on numerous field studies of
established shopping centers of various sizes. The use of these trip rates will
generate estimated driveway traffic volumes. -
The estimated traffic volumes were adjusted downward to reflect the phenomenon of
passerby trips. A passerby trip is a vehicle trip that already exists on an adjacent
street before development of a particular project but which will be attracted to the new
: project once it is in place. Since the ITE rates refiect total trips entering and leaving a
site, including pass-by trips, the estimated trips must be reduced before assigning
the trips to the street system. Without this reduction, the net increase in traffic due to
the new project would be overestimated since it would double-count the passerby
trips. The passerby reduction for weekday and Saturday traffic was 24 percent and 15
percent , respectively.
- Since 421,00 square feet of retail space is currently in use at the mall, only the net
increase in traffic due to the expansion was added to the traffic in the surrounding
street system.
Trip Distribution
The project trips were distributed to the street system based on the iravel pattern of
existing mall shopping trips. The existing pattern was established by examining mall
driveway counts performed as a part of this study. The distribution was validated by
comparing it to the results of a license plate survey of existing mall shoppers that was
recently performed for a market analysis of the mall expansion.
1
~7~~ yJ I^ .'i..u Ie
I;wt
r u7unvA : +roIN `ruHmI ' L F ~ ( • ~ IN N ~O~ I
1~., trHNt ~ ~~.p ~ ,I► r
a IL "l=~I~~ ~
1 O a~oa M73tl7e3n3L , ;ju-~- Ud ~3U7alA) _Otlt in ' y
0 \ I
d~W ~W 9 ak ~ ~ L[
- W ~
.!.uvoe-u3w,w J µ3 rn (j ~ d . a r~wTn-~ F~ ~ ~ o~,~n h (Y
~
~ ~
? ~ N a 5 v
da'~ler~~r ~ra13
sN
1 ~y ~ Z
m ~ ~ ~ W aNOIHI NOlN17l n 1 4 dC V` U
1 ~ ~ I
J Oa1-' ~ ~ V ~ a 'J ~l ~'=g~n~';V I = `~NOOSM PJ~lJ~~9N~ro W ~
Otl J.
ly I I ~ "<I`d`a 1~ ~ aN ~n -
~ j I u I r 11~r1~0~M NJ1000M Ib~Mr~ODON t€~r v~`~'L~ ~ a
I r
u I
1 a 'I W
~ ~ 3z ~ ~ ~ W U J y I I ~ 4N~?tli6 ri • I U 3m ~
L~JU~ ~~5iri~
: ° ; N a= o m Ooati --aTDnl~' 7 ~ J d317~3n - n3titl3n~ d3UY3n AIki~o~i
6R3Y SM 111100 ~ ~i~xIuI U~M
. ~
a ~ n ~1 ~ . ad ir ~
no , ~ o ~ ~ ' I.--I -t ` ~ 5r~! ~I 1 1~ AW)101 ~ ~
I N7M ~ ~ b ~iT7Nrd Q ~ ! ~I...J • u
; qI~r ti ~ 3 11 ~ '°lwA I ,~I a,~dNk lfea3P~ -
1.1v tl a
JnNitlbIp~Hltltl NIYtl ltl7N..]BOtl 1 W ~
~ ~I I~ 1 u7i'~1xtlrD ~ o ~ p IJ ;Vy! II I ~ m aNrawn N wi, ~I I
~LJI..I ~ 4diHn~ S]~7~~ 1 ! L t
(t ~ • n]~tl` L ~ I r r~f ~ I~ 1 w` U Qtl x0i e I Z xJ 2
r 8 l~^L" a
I1 I`! ;I fI~UnUr~✓Q ~1 I[f~II~ neiiM JL =6~1 ~ r
011 S UwA J ~L.J,~L.~tlJ ~,~f m, o ~tl v O k l j 3 1 a u~SIlv9~ l 1 I 1 S S) l r
~ a . 7 ~ U~ J L~ N J U ~ ~
) f o c o,~Q ►Ob M ~ d v 4 A ~ ~ r OP Oa r H ~ MLl
? otlsMaoa«l ~j -p
3
0,' v'I= ; I I ~
_ ~ a.,•m;'L ~
~ L~Kary% ~ I ~aoo~~,Joo 9t lo oC
~,~a~K ~ 1 ~
~y111 1 I N 1 I NItlCMd1Y i
'
~
~ ~ ~ ~ c~c~~N a w1 ~ II ~ iufari I
I~
U
NN ~ -~117~d Otl7.1tl)~d 7~l1~ Dtl3tl nI ~ i~ J~°
tr • NX ~
1~' IM ¢ 1S g !,M'~'~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ F ~ Y~~1~NN 7 O '~OIJ ~y.~jL" f• i
N n
, •Tl "W YWA Otl bllnr ~ ~V••. ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ Jtl ~
tl)1 Nvn I I
1 ` " J wA, I~ ~ tl31tlM~u~ tl31Ytg ~ N1' ~ tl~rrN~rtJU =,1~ ~ 2 01
~qU
' [,7 f~ + OrOtl uSN3nw~ ~b IdLI ❑rr +~1s Wm 1 ~ ~4e n ~tl 0 ON ~ ~ c~'
d
NO/I,IRr`~ Y ~ ON ATtl R~ wx~ g ~ -Otq~ar~ ~~p~
tl f ~ NL~~~ ~iiw n~ind ~Mi~ 7- d o
~
~ ro,od ~ d*9„3, 11 ~
L~ ~ ~4y~ OdI s ~now1 a x, J /„►~"vil
MIf~LLn1tlfO J ~ ~ I I ~ ~UVU F~ 1/ F ~
~'OltM7M' ~ eN Or tl f0' W --y IUfK lbf0 C 0
~
~ < _
~jnoiooaxt-
Q W l-' ~ ~aNns Moe
ONvltl7f1i1$ ~ ~ ~11AO~ u~!SJ~SPI~1~1. ~ L/~L ~~/~I ~i s~ ' L b~ UM
` tbe~ jLL VJ Ci ~so~~ ~ ~
~ oa~M~ae~l~ O.
ikn3o~- ~~i
` r is wi a,an ~ V' ~
~ ~
a.` i~ f f h MI
ki- Mlrou L e~r~~~~~~ ~ 4'~~
E"~ Ifl01
. ~`3..~ rir a
. )
1 f ro~erl` u►1I ~
I LL ~ v g J Sp4~ V
( ~ ~ SHiM]IfIH 1 mJSM ~ . ~ M I'
Z
r II 1
rn~
~ N ~ LJLJLJ
lrI w n
7~e
{ i i]Oa. ~ ~ '0 - A_
; u'ul ; ;F=1kN~
nn~ ~tnri g . 7N37uK-~ W
I J
> 1~JL~ vbnri W
~r`~ . ' ,
L~
J S 5S~ ~ Z
ISSA
t~~I~~) ~y21 ~~3r 15510'
~U 36530~1daiS • ~f;
: y
y Q a ~R a ~e IA nsIr ~ ~ ~ Z
: ~ : «z
~ 3 q < 3 W
B~Ou Y?16 "VN" f~i 113= 7r7~0 " ~ rpvi4W
F;~ 1 ~ ° y ~ ~L JL O~1Cl
►1) ~ 6a~rr►~13~1 ar n) I I_(~~~ a N vtrrill- d I R t s~~ tQ J Z
S n Otl 7 Al)
r tlu ` V 6 ♦ ~
Al^~.D~ ~
p IJQ~ ~L Jo...l ; ~nNl7 71 n390~ a
~
r aVodMeVd ~
Nn~~pg N "y w avw'`K L~a
4d L.iLIG;- UL.iG-IdJLJ OL r ~ ~
~ H~~~ nn~
~l I Alti a J~ fAlll '
J '
f
. . • . . ~ . ~..w. . ' ~~LLr~yra1 M....~r•. . . . .
. • .
. . . • ,
~ •
The project trips were assigned to the site access drives based on the location of
, major retailers -and the availability of parking. As is true for the existing mali, right-
in/right-out only access was assumed- for the Sprague Avenue driveway to the east of
Raymond Road. Fufl access was assumed for all of the other site driveways. Due to
the change in the distribution of parking capacity from the existing surface spaces in
front of the mall to parking structures on the sides and rear of the expanded mall, there
wiil be a change in the disiribution of access traffic. Currently, 54 percent of the entering traffic and 45 percent of the exiting traffic use the Sprague Avenue driveways.
: In the future, with a higher proportion of mall traffic using University Road and Walnut
Road to access the parking structures, ihese percentages will drop to 38 percent and
40 percent respectively.
Backqround Traffic Growth
1
The annual growth in traffic on the surrounding street system was determined based
' on a review of historical traffic counts by the County over the past 10 years. The
= review indicated that the annual rate of growth has varied from 1 percent at certain
intersections to 5 percent at other locations in the vicinity of the site, with an overalf
~ average of about 2 percent. This figure is consistent with the County's estimate of
future traffic growih and with growth rate assumed in other recent traffic studies in the
area. Therefore, a 2 percent annual growth rate was chosen to apply to 'the existing
, counts (done as a part of this study and by the County) to estimate future background
traffic volumes.
~
Impact Analysis
; The impact analyses were based on the procedures outlined in the 1985 Highway
Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Traffic control
, and signal timing information was obtained. from County of Spokane staff for the
~ signalized locations of Broadway Avenue/University Road, Sprague Avenue/University
Road, and the potential Felts Road extensioNSprague Avenue. This information was
' also obtained for the future signalized intersection of Sprague Avenue/Gillis Road. The
University Road/Fourth Avenue intersection is unsignalized. The capacity analysis was
performed for the existing and future (1991) cases.
~ The two cases were analyzed for the weekday p.m. peak hour and the Saturday peak
~ hour. For the existing case, the weekday p.m. peak hour occurred between 3:30 and
' - 6:30 p.m. for the analyzed intersections; while the Saturday peak hour occurred during
the 12:00 - 2:15 p.m. period. The traffic volumes used in the future analysis were
= derived in the following manner:
Step 1. Subtract existing mall traffic from the weekday p.m. peak hour and
Saturday peak hour counts to obtain existing background traffic.
Step 2. Estimate future background traffic by applying annual growth factor to
existing background traffic.
Step 3. Add project traffic to future background traffic to obtain total future traffic.
- The Saturday case was only analyzed to provide a margin of safety in the traffic impact
. assessment, by evaluating the recommended mitigations for p.m. peak hour conditions
under worst case conditions to isolate and determine if any bottlenecks would occur.
3
,
; •
The following procedure was used to analyze the signalized intersections:
Step 1. Analyze the intersection with the existing signal timing and geometry. _Step 2. Mitigate any adverse impacts by improvements to signal timing/phase
only. Step 3. If step 2 fails to adequately mitigate the impacts, mitigate the adverse
impacts by geometric and signal timing improvements at the
~ intersection.
lmpact mitigation was recommended when the level of service (LOS) at the
intersection' deteriorated to a level worse than the existing LOS. The degree of
congestion at an intersection is ranked on a scale of A to F, with LOS A representing uncongested conditions and LOS F representing over capaciry conditions. A complete
description of intersection level of service can be found in the appendix.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Primary access to the existing mall is provided by three streets bordering the site:
Sprague Avenue on the north, University Road on the east, and Dartmouth Road on
the west. Second Avenue borders the site to the south, however, there are no major
mall entrances on this side of the mall. Sprague Avenue and University Road are
principal arterials which carry 25,300 and 13,600 vehicles per day, respectively.
Sprague Avenue is a 7-lane divided facility with channelized turn pockets between
intersections and left turn lanes at the intersections. University Road is a 4-lane
undivided facility with no left turn lanes. Dartmouth Road is a local access street.
Figure 2 shows the street nefirvork and channelization,and figure 3 shows average daily
traffic at major intersections.
Two additional facilities in ihe vicinity of the site that are significantly affected by mall
traffic are Broadway Avenue and Fourth Avenue. Broadway Avenue is a 4-lane
undivided principal arterial carrying 12,000 vehicles per day. Fourth Avenue is a 2-
lane east-west collector located 2 blocks south of the site.
Immediately south of the site, the Spokane Transit Authority operates a temporary
transit center at University Road/Third Avenue. The transit center is served by 7
routes with 274 weekday bus trips. Rough(y 40-60 bus patrons utilize the center's
. temporary park-and-ride lot on a daiiy basis. By late summer of 1989, a permanent
transit center will be constructed at this location. It may ultimately accommodate 10
routes operating at one-half,hour headways, with an additional 150 weekday bus trips, and will also feature 236 park-and-ride spaces. In addition, the existing mall is
served by 2 bus stops along Sprague Avenue and one stop along Universiry Road.
The existing mall is surrounded on three sides by primarily commerciaUretail
development. The area to the south of the site is residential.
The 5 analyzed intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during the weekday
p.m. peak hour. The only signalized intersection that operates at LOS D is Sprague
Avenue/University Road. A summary of the existing levels of service at the 5
intersections is shown in table 1. The 1989 p.m. peak hour turning movements are
shown in figure 4.
4
ACAD C \PROJECTS\89033-61\UW OWG 6/5/89 ~ s/s/ss
~
• LOS B ,
4 IANES UND{VIDED
POTENTIAL BROADWAY AVE
~ FELTS ROAD -
EXTENSION BALFOUR ROAD RAYMOND ROAO
r-- 7 IANES DIVIDED
W{TH LEFT TURN GILLIS ROAD
LANES
LOS 0* ~ LOS D
SPRAGUE AVE. a LOS B ~ ~ a a
G~ 4 ~ G~ G= 4 , G~ G~ G`=
~ .~t-~ T
-J..- ' _ `
~ ~ ~ t
~ ~ ~ NOT TO S~ ~ ~J ~ ~J ~ NOT TO SCALE
~
I LOS D*
2 IANES i
0 0 Q Q
0 0 ~ ` ~
_
~ ~ - ~
o ~ ~ w
> ~ Z
Q O ~
4 IANES UNDIVIDED
SECOND AV~,
2 LANES LOS D*
2 LANES
~
FOURTH AVE.
LOS C*
-icn
* - APPLIES TO IDENTIFIEQ APPROACH ONLY . .
SPOKANE TRANSIT ~
AUTHORiTY ROUTE
FIGURE 2
~ CONDITIONS
~fGUR
EXISTING CONDITI~ ~
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC
ACAD C \PRQJECTS\89033-61\UW OWG 6/5/89 . G 6/5/89
~
~ 3300 I
~ ~o~~o ~
~ BROADWAY AVE. ! FELTS ROAD ~ ~
BALFOUR ROAD RAYMOND ROAD EXTENSION
11960
8450
GIL~IS ROAD
; 5500
SPRAGUE AVE.
26820
\ / --,r -,r \ I T
~ ~ ~ / \
, 25290 Nar To NOT TO SCALE
13550
0 0 Q Q
0 0 ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~
o ~ ~ w
. >
~ Z Q ~ ~
SECOND AVE.
2020
~
FOURTH AVE.
F
1770 a
FIGU FIGURE 3
EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TR~ DAILY TRAFFIC
AT MAJOR INTERSEC1 ENfNANCOENGINEERS~ INC. ~ INTERSECTIONS ~
,~~M~ l. \I'CIVJtI.~J~OyVJ.1-~~ v~~~ v li.ruJ
u ~
•
4 ° ' 15 135 10 300
i , 1 p
\
BROADWAY AVE.
rELTS ROAD ~ ~ ~
BALFOUR ROAD RAYMOND ROaD 30 EXTENSION 460 ~7 100 120 65
, 180
~ GILLIS ROAD
SPRAGUE AVE, a~ o „o ,o
~ 820 15 0 50 15 0 0 870 80 150 120 ~ 7g5 5 0 10 ~ 1000 840 835
~ ~ 25 ~ 75 80 1 70 I
4 ~ -r- T ~ I T I
~ 1190 ~7 / ~ ' 1280 1- ~
1230 ~ 20 ~ 75 125 15 50 100 ~ 945 ~ 1~ ~~g 100 15 0 10 NOT T( NOT TO SCAL.E
60 45 95 60 t24g 10 0 25 ~~g~ ~ 25 5 0 160 1245 ~7 ~
~ 20 30 15 5
,
25 ~ ~ 10 15 15 3U ~ 5
~ a ~
Q ~oo Q O O
~ ~ = 30
- 30 60 10
~ N O ~p ~ 5 60 10 ~
- ~ ,w W s >
~ Z Q ~
o ss ~ ~
s
SECOND AVE.
~ Zo 30
~
~ 10
25 560 30 15 ~ ~
~ i , FOURTN AVE.
f ~
zo
~ 25 ~ 15 335 S
' 20
i ~
I
FIG' ~ FIGURE 4
19B9 P.M. PFJ'+K '.M. PF'AK HOUR
TURNING MOVE ENTRANCQENGINEERS, INC ING MOVEMENTS ~
.
E r
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
The totai trips generated by the expanded mall and the net increase in trips from the
existing mall are shown in the tabie below
Table 2
Trip Generatian Estrmates
Peak Haur Daily
Ta#al Tnos Net Increase Total Trips Net Increase
Averaqe V►leekdav
.
Drrveway Trips 2,910 1,644 32,412 17,079
- Net Trips (with 2,226 1,411 25,494 15,219
24°fa reduction)
Saturctay
Drtveway Tnps 3,736 1,799 39,552 19,176
~ Net Trips (with 3,181 1,806 34,367 19,786
- 15% reductian)
}
: 1991 P M Peak Hvur
Y
The traffic genera#ed by the expanded mall wtll be approximatel)0,-'73Lpe_rcent grea-ten'
than the traffic generated by #he exisfing matl. Q'his_repr_esents=an_increase_ln_the_p.m)
~peak-hour-otgi ;41 -l.uehicte irips_ovet' the exis#ing_m~@l traffic The p m peak hour trip
distribuhan is shown in figuce S.
Other than the Unsversity RoadlFourth Avenue intersec#ivn there will be nv deterioration
in the level of ser►nce from existing conditions (table 1 and figure G) The Fourth
Avenue approaches at Universit}r Road were determined ta apera#e at LOS E during
the p m peak haur The primary reasvn for this adverse impact is the relaUvely heavy
rrarthbvundlsou#hbound volumes created by tne increased number of mall trips from
the sauth. At the 5prague AvenuelCil#is Road interseciian, the level of serrriCe will
actually irnprove tQ A wrth the installabon of asignal by the Caunty in summer 1989
The mall access driveways were analyzed as unsignalrzed intersections The access
driveway to the east of Rayrnond Road on Sprague Avenue was analyzed as a right-
rnlright-aut only driveway. All other drirreways were considered #o have full access.
The anly location having an unacceptable level of service was the driveway on
University Road that will serve the targe parkmg structure on the east side of the site
A Eeve# of setvice F was rdecrtified #or this driveway, which rnay be attributed ta the
heavy teft tucn movements ou# af the parking structure onto narthbound University
Raad LOS values far alf of the driveways are shown in figure fi.
1991 Saturday Peak Hour
As previously rnentianed, aSaturday peak haur case was examined to determine rf the
street system cfluld adequately handEe worst case traffic conditions The only
significant deficiency was the LOS F calculated far the Sprague AvenuelUniversi#y
9
- - . . ,
Table 1
Intersection Level of Service Summary
Exlsting Condltlons 1991
P.M Peak Saturday Peak P M Peak Saturday Peak
Intersection Delay' LOS Delav LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
Sprague Avenue/Felts 11,1 8 11 2 B 123 8 129 B
Road Extension
Sprague Avenue/ 268 D 351 D 357 D > 60 F
Urnversity Road (332) (D)
Sprague Avenue/ N/A D N/A D/E 45 A 5.7 B
GiIIis Road'"
•
University Road/ 67 8 7,5 8 7,1 B 78 B
Broadway Avenue
University Road/
Fourih Avenueo' N/A CID N/A BIC N/A E N/A DIE
' Delay measured ln seconds per vehicle
The Sprague Avenue/Qdlis Ftoad end Urnversiry RoadlFourth Avenue intersections are currently unsignalized The LOS is for the stop
controlled approaches See the appendix for a discussion of level of service for unsignalized intersecbons
Denotes level of service with mMgation.
,
~ ' At~rw ~„~wrtuJtuk~~o~uaa-~~ ~ ~O`~' VJ.1=O 1 rU~r.U41t~a f1f J~ O~
~
3X
~
~
B~~Q~1~~ J~I~. +x i ~ /E.
BALF4UR R~AD ~Y~aar~o Raan
, - . ~ ~x ax ax
GfLL~S RaAO , .
SPRAGUE AVE.
,x ,z ~ ~z ~ ~ ~ ~x
~ 4x ix 4~ 31~
~ ~ ~ -r ~ 1 ` ~J ~
~ 267i ~ 7X / \ 3~ ~ ~ ~
\ x97G ~D ! \ ' ti~x ~x
, 14x ~z ~t ~x a ~ x zx ~x ax ~ a~
NOT 7~ SCA.F
~
~ ax Q
~ ~ o~
~ ~
~ 3
,bsc
, ~ iax ~ ~r ~
I
SEC~~D A~. ~r „x .
~ sz
~
r~
ex
~
~x ~
FDU~TH AVE, f L.
,s~
nGR.If1G 5
~99~ PROJ~C7 ~1RAir1C0 ENGlN~ERS JNC. PROJECT P.M. PEAK HC3UR
1 TRlP DISTRIBUTI4N ~
~ - - - _ - - ~
~ xW+u t,,~h'nl~tt~t~~a~u,,~-u~
~
2G
15 1BQ f0 ~ 31~
6.R
BROADWAY AVE. YE.
9ALFaUR R~AD RAYMQND ~OAD LOS B ao
{80 11D ~t5 B5 ~
~00
G1LUS R~Aa
SPRAGU~ AVE.
~s o L4S Q L~S 1 i~s a 8 ~ g~g 1S 15 58 4 895 25 15 5 g~g 10S 1$9 ]2S 5 d D 0
C~ 8Z0 1 1 ~30 ' 230 I
~ ~S 55 ~ 27Q 25 ~O y Y .T Q~ t09Q 25 LOS A
~a~s ~3oa ~
, 2so zo sa ` ~a
j~ 1S ~ z~s so ~as ~ ~q45 30 15 ~5 1~f5 30 1S 45 1110 18Q 125 210 15 0 t0
1530 0 10 NOT To sCALE
~ ~ 30 165 1$ E LOS E~ ~ o I
~
~ LOS A rY p
0~ »o ~ ~a a.,~
0
LOS A ~ L~5 F
3 w z~s ~
o ~ ~s ,~s ~o ~ ~
LOS A
S~CONQ AVE. ao 7,~
ss I
~ ~2s .
I
~o
~o ~o ~ is Lt~S
~
FQUR`TN AVE. 1~.
~o LOS ~ ~ 1S ~54 S
~ - ~IPPL~ES TO fC ~o JES TO fDENT(FiED
APP~QACH QN r r3.l+ u ' 1 uray ■
I
1991 FIGURE 6
k7~1'RANCO ENGINEERSi INC. TU 1991 P.M. PEi4K HOUR
TuRNlNG MOvENlENTS
~
Road intersection. This problem is caused primarily by the heavy left turn movements
on the westbound approach destined for the parking garage on University Road. The
Saturday peak hour levels of service are shown in table 1, with the corresponding
turning movements shown in figure 7.
MITIGATION
1991 P.M. Peak Hour
The negative impact at the University Road/Fourth Avenue intersection caused by the
all expansion could be mitigated by installation of a signal. Signal warrants currently
eere not met at the location, however, as traffic volumes on the minor cross street
~A ~1r (Fourth Avenue) are too low. This problem will be addressed, however, when the
County installs a signal as a part of the Universiry Road improvements (currently
scheduled for late 1991).
For the congested driveway on University Road, the following improvements are
, recommended:
1. Install a si9nal;
, 2. Install left turn pockets;
3. Provide an auxiliary right turn lane for traffic entering the driveway.
_ WJ rvuts,rj
_ Installation of the" tur~n pockPt is warranted bv the fairlv heaw left turn movements
irom the south. This improvement would also prevent excessive weaving movements
. that may occur 'between the driveway and Sprague Avenue with the existing laning.
Installation of a leit turn pocket on the north side of the driveway would benefit the
commercial development on the Pas side of Universihr Road, so that ihis improvement
may be coordinated with the neighboring property owners.
The auxiliary right tuXl I ne will be ngeded to accommodate the heavv 4.m. peak haut
volumes aQges$ing the site irom che SoraqLgg Avonue/University Road intersection.
fillis lane could be located on the mall property and therefore should be incorporated
in the final site design.
1991 Saturday Peak Hour
To address the LOS F condition at the Spr.igi.,,e Avenue/UniversiN P
oa.d intersection, it
is recommended that an addition ( left tum tane hP 'constructed on the westbound
S_prague Avenue aoQrqac:t,lt appears that this can be done within the existing cross
section because ttie raised concrete turn pocket on this approach is 21 feet in width.
This would allow for 10' and 11' turn lanes or two 11' turn lanes if an additional foot
could be "shaved" from the other lanes.
A second improvernent that should be considered at Sprague Avenue/Univeristy Road
for the future Saturday peka hour is the addition of a riQht-turn-onlv lane on
• northbound Univeqj.ty.R,oad,, This will allow the through and right turn movements to
remain at an acceptable level of service.
_With both of the above improvements, the existing level o( service D at Sprague
AvenuelUniversity Road can be maintained.
12
1
- - ` nl,nu ~Pr~~►,►z4 i a ~~~1~~.~-~ ~~U.~d~-U ~ ~v~• .~.~u t,+~ .1~
~
16 ~
2~ ~so ~a ~ ~
eo
~ BROADWAY AVE. ~
~
a~t~auR ~a►~ ~a~oNa RoAa LOS e ,s l '
2s~ 12s ~ea s~ ~ r i
~~a GII.~S RaAD
SP RA~UE AVE. ~QS F
L~S ~ ~a ~o C~ 1128 1~7 23i 168 ?a Q 15
Q~ 6g0 ~ f87~ 75
75 I/~~ I T .7. LV r
's" 1$70 -~~7 IL
~ ' 36~ ti 3S SS
7.$5 35 1305 175 190 3Q5 l195 74 Q 8U
~0 ~
0
~ 4
~ ~ ~ NaT rO scaLIE
N
3 ~
~ ~
SECOND ~VE.
r i
r ~
Yu°#► F . -
I I
' - t M ! a a~ RLl9 a ~ t ~ L ~ ~
s~
!S T15 3Q ~0 # •
~Q~ 10 ~ . ;
1
~OURTH AV~.
ta 1
LOS E~ zs ~ ~o sss ~o F - 1
,s ~ - APPI.l~S TO IDE ~ L 1
APPR~~GM ONL' ~ ir
~
~
19~ 1 SAT~1~ ~Nl'RANCO ENGINE~Rg, 1NC. -
TURI .~I
APPENDIX
LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT
_ LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT
Because intersectron capacity and traffic fiow performance, or "level of service
are prime factors in ihe alternatives development and evaluataon process, a brief
description is presented here for the benefit of the lay reader
The ratio of exishng traffic volume to availabie capacity provides a measure of
intensity of traffic loading relative to the ability of the street intersection to
accommodate the traffic The number of lanes, presence of turn lanes, type of iraffic
control, signal phasing, etc , are important capacity determinants As the
volume/capacity ratio (v/c) approaches a value of 1 0, extreme congestion sets in, with
long backups at signalized intersections and the passage of several complete
changes of the signal cycles before a motorist can proceed Motorists at stop-sign
controiled intersection approaches face extremely long delays This congestion can
also impede access to and from upstream abutting property as traffic queues
lengthen
The term "level of service" is used to describe intersection traffic flow
performance and for signalized intersections is essentially based on v/c ratios (see
Table A-1)
Table A-1
' Traffic Level of Service and
_ Volume/Capacity Ratio Relationships
for Signalized Intersections
Level
Intersection of General Description
V/C Ratio Service (Siqnalized Intersecbons)
Under 0 60 A Free flow
0 61 to 0 70 B Stable flow (slight delays)
0 71 to 0 80 C Stable flow (acceptable delays)
0 81 to 0 90 D Approaching unstable flow
(tolerable delay occasionally
wait through more than one signal
cycle before proceeding)
0 91 to 1 00 E" Unstable flow (intolerable delay) -
capaciry
Over 1 00 F Forced flow Oammedj
Source Transportation Research Board Circular 212, "Interim Materials on
Highway Capacity",1980
A - 1
1
1
Level of service "A" is a condition of unimpeded flow, while level of service "C" is
often used in the design of new urban streets as the lowest acceptable level for peak
periods CongesUon begins to occur at level of service "D" (v/c from 0 81 to 0 90)
Because of funding and/or environmentai constraints for improvements, this level of
service is being used by more cities as an adequate level, particularly for
improvements to congested existing faciliUes Increasingly unstable traffic fiow with
excessive delay and congestion occurs as level of service °E" (capacity) is
approached (v/c = 0 91 to 1 00) For v/c > 1 00, levei of service "F" (forced fiow) is
obtained, and the intersection is overloaded or is jammed due to traffic backups from
overioaded downstream intersections Table A-2 shows daily traffic volumes
corresponding to peak-hour level of service C, D, and E(capacity) applicable to
roadways of various numbers of lanes and configurations
Table A-2
Guidelines for Relating Average Weekday Daily Traffic Volumes
to Peak-Hour Level of Service for Suburban Artenals of
Various Roadway Lane Configurations
Daily Two-Way
Traffic Volume for
Various Levels of Service*
Total Level of
Number Level of Level of Service E
of Lanes Lane Confiquration Service C Service D (Caqacitv)
2 Two Lanes 8,000 10,000 11,000
3 Two Lanes with Left-
Turn Lane 12,000 14,000 16,000
4 Four Lanes 20,000 22,000 24,000
5 Four Lanes with Left-
Turn Lane 24,000 26,000 30,000
6 Six Lanes 27,000 30,000 33,000
7 Six Lanes with Left-
Turn Lane 30,000 35,000 38,000
` The volumes represent maximums for the daily volume that will result in
levels of service indicated durmg peak hours
Modified by Entranco Engineers from original source "Crossroads Study and
Subarea Plan", by Ciry of 6ellevue Planning Department, June 1979
A - 2
/
1 ~
e
It should be noted that equal v/c raUos at several locations do not necessarily indicate
equal overall performance of intersecUons since one location may experience a high
v/c ratio for a considerable period of the day while at another the peak period is of
short duration In addition, a low level of service is more tolerable at a low-volurne
intersecUon than a high-volume location
Capacity analysis for two-way stop intersections is based on the assumption that
major street traffic is not affected by the minor street movements, and left-turns from
the major streets to the minor streets are infiuenced only by opposing major street
through flow The level of service caiculated for two-way stop intersections are
therefore only for all movements on the minor street and left-turn movement on major
streets The general level of service concept also holds for stop-sign-controlled
intersections, although the capacity of the stop-sign-controlled a~proaches is less
than that of the signalized intersect,on approach Table A-3 shows the level of
service criteria for unsignalized intersecGons
Tabie A-3
Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections
Reserve Capacity Level of Expected Delay to
(PCPH) Service Minor Street Traffic
400 A Litt1e or no delay
300-399 6 Short traffic delays
200-299 C Average traffic delays
100-199 D Long traffic delays
0-99 E Very long traffic delays
* F
' When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,
extreme delays witl be encountere►d with quewng which may
cause sever congestion affecting other traffic movements in the
intersection This condition usually warrants improvements to
the intersection
Source Transportation Research Board Specia! Report 209, "Highway
Capacity Manual", 1985
A - 3
I
~ v
. ~
,
ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC.
LETTER OF 0 IAKE WASHIN(3TON PARK BUILDING (206) 827-1300
5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N E FAX (206) 827-7338
KIRKLAND WASHINGTON 98033
~ TRANSM/TTAL O MEMORANDUM
0 516 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDINt3 (206)258-6202
EVERETT WASHINGTON 98201
To Jew 1, vi Iv, 1-& . Date
ss1
f
Project No 94)02>3 ~ bI
1 ' , • ,~l1 ~
C5 C`,i~ 3Z~ 33T Title .~1~~ ~~tu,C~C ~ 6 st cy1
. ~
Attention 6uj" ~-L Re
~ATTACHEO o ORIGINALS
UNDER SEPARATE COVEfi o PRINTS o OTHER i~-
FOR YOUR o INFORMATION/USE VAS REQUESTED c OTHER
OUR o REVIEWED o NOT APPROVEO
ACTION o APPROVED o SEE REMARKS c OTHER
REQUESTED o APPROVAI o MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED
ACTION ❑ REVIEW & COMMENT o REVISE 8 RESU8MIT c OTHER
NO OF ORAWINC3
COPIES NUMBER OESCRIPTION
Remarks
~
By cc
DISTRIBUTION White to Addressee - Canery o Project File - Pink to Day File A 02 (2-89)
. Taylor Engineerin , Inc.
~.Civil Design and Land Planning
A.IR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
FoR
UNIVERSITY CITY SHOPPING MALL EXPANSION
,
Prepared June 7, 1989 By: James Borgan
Taylor Enguieering, Inc.
W 106 Miasion, Suite 206
Spokane, Washington 99201
(609) 328-3371
~*v~ ~ ~ y „ K ~ rs °t,f✓
p
JUN 0 81989
~€~3~~,d~ ~ltt~ S~` tit$~~ • u„r,,,,,e,.~., . . .3.~'
W 106 Mission Ave • Spokane WA 99201 0 (509) 328-3371
1r`
~
Uni mer s i ty G itv Ma 11
89-012C Air Quality
June 7, 1989
Statement of Purpose / Summary
The purpose of this report is to summarize the estimated air
quality irnpacts of the proposed expansion of the University City Mall by
W irr v est De ~le 1«pment The proposed deve lopment is located on the
southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and University Road in Spokane's
"Central Valley", Figure 1 shows its location as well as 1987 "average
weekday traff ic" (AWDT)I✓. Sprague Avenue is one of Spokane County's
"primary (east/west) arterials" within the Valley.
Based on the historical data pertaining to air quality and the
resulta of a separate traff ic study2✓ , and the results of standard air
quality analysis procedures, it was concluded there is little likelihood
the proposed developed will create violations of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards
FIGURE NO 1
.
' 5983 ~ 652 y~ 8 io ~ a 931 472
~ 14 13 114~9 1-1- 9 ~ Broedwa Av,
21~40'1 1099 0038 Rg 8~3 852
i 1 061
. .L~
~
` 7 3!] 5 58 ~ r 9,3 n `d9 0°
zr-
° 71 90
c
2 a
1 ;Q-
ve !9~ 31 22 ~59 4 '00! 33641 23963 4 706 ~~-,5 Spraque Ave
a 9 ~ 1g~EPiS1 2~9 13548 28367 ~861 ' 25310 b
UNIV7Y C Y~'J~'~ "
~
3547 ~cn Ave ` ~i5 ~ ~406 P64
4th Ilve S
l773 2107
2700
t ° 1855 1902992 62
8 Ave c ~ 8556
)49
w I
r O
q v
r -1✓ Source: SPokane County Engineering Department,
21 UNIVErSIT?' CfTY HALL: TRAFFIC I1-tPACT STUDY (ENTRANCO Engineers,
Inc.; June, 1989).
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 1
1
Spokane contains designated "non-attainment" areas for both carbon
monoxide and total suspended particulates (TSP) TSP concentrations is
predominantly associated with non-transportation related sources, and it
is considered unlikely the proposed expansion of University City will
have any adverse effects
The non-attainment area for carbon monoxide does not extend to the
Spokane Valley Spokane has historically violated only National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 9 ppm for the "8-hour average carbon
monoxide concentration" The NAAQS for CO allows only one eight hour
average per year to exceed 9 ppm.
The Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA)
maintained a continuous monitoring station in the Spokane Valley at the
Valley Fire Station on the northwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Balfour Road (directly across from University City) for several years
but discontinued its use due to the low concentrations of C0. From 1981
to 1986, concentrations recorded at the fire station exceeded the 8-hour
standard no more than once a year; consequently, no violations occurred
The following provides a summary of historical maximuro concentrations
and the estimates developed for 1989 and 1991 with the proposed
expansion of the University City Mall
VALLEY FIRE STATION
"Exceedances" of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for Average 8-Hour Concentration of Carbon Monoxide
- ; Max No > Violations
YEAR ; Conc NAAQS of NAAQS
~
1981 ; 11 00 1 0
1982 ; 10 00 1 0
1984 ; 11 00 1 0
1985 ; 10 00 1 0
1985 ; 6 00 0 0
1989 ; 5 61 0 0(estimate)
1991 ; 7 15 0 4(estimate w/
U-City expansion)
Carbon monoxide is produced primarily by automotive emissions Of
the numerous variables associated with emissions the three of greatest
importance in relation to the proposed development are
(1) Traffic volumes,
(2) The year to be estimated, and,
(3) Average operating speeds
Based on the reduction of vehicles without emission controls as time
passes, it is anticipated the reduction in emission rates will offset
the effects of changes in the other two variables
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 2
,
Methodology
.
The estimated concentrations of carbon monoxide used two standard
computerized procedures
(1) MOBILE3 is used to estimate vehicular emission rates,
and,
(2) CALINE3, a"dispersion model for predicting air pollutant
levels near highways and arterial streets"
The basic steps in completing the estimates were as follows
STEP 1• Definition of Impact Area
The air quality "impact area" selected was based on the
location of the monitoring statlon and the arterial system most
impacted by the proposed development (see Figure 2)
Fl GURE NO 2
. _ i
Main ;
VALLEY FIRE
~ STATION
0~
0
4-4
r 4
Y-
~ 4--A w t-*-- -0-• P4 -i---~- ~D Sp rague
} ► ~ } ~
y t rr t Y Y
r
A University „
~
C ity ~Y
~ t
I IL
lecond Avenue
Y
~
r.-- r •c
r
T, TAYLaR ENGINEERYNG
University City Mall
Page 3
.
STEP 2 Development of Required Input Variables
MOBILF3 requires inputs such as average vehicle speeds,
vehicle ages, distribution of vehicle-miles-traveled by type of
vehicle, inspection/maintenance program parametersl/, vehicle
"phase" parameters, etc. CALINE3 requires inputs pertaining to
meteorological conditions (e.g., ambient air temperatures,
"stablity class", etc roadway design and geometrics, traffic
volumes, etc As indicated previously, the three most critical to
the variance in estimates are traff ic volumes, average speeds, and
the year for which the pro3ections are being made (the remaining
variableB are either fairly stable, related to the year beign
estimated, or are estimated for "worst case conditions")
STEP 3 "Calibrate" MOBILE3
The procedures are executed for known conditions to assure the
models and inputs produce reasonable results. Since the 8 hour
carbon monoxide standard is most critical to Spokane, a method of
correlating one hour concentrations (the output of CALINE3) with
8 hour concentrations is needed
The year 1985 was selected as the base year, PM peak hour
traffic conditions were used as the "worst case" To estimate PM
peak hour traffic volumes, historical trends in traff ic growth from
1958 to 1987 on arterials in the vicinity of University City were
used to estimate average annual growth rates (Attachment # 1
contains statistical summaries of the analyses) Procedures
contained in NCHRP Report 187 were used to develop estimates of
average speeds
The procedures resulted in an estimated one hour CO
concentration of 12 3 ppm The observed maximum one hour
concentration in 1985 was 12 ppm (December 17, 1985), the maximum
8 hour concentration was 10 ppm It was assumed if the one hour
concentration did not exceed 12 ppm, one or less exceedences would
occur, and no violations would occur STEP 4 Estimate Emission Rates
Emission rates were estimated using MOBILE3 and the parameters
developed in Step 2 Estimated speeds were developed based on
procedures contained in NCHRP Report 187; f igures on the following
page depict results for 1980 through 1991 and for speeds between 5
and 25 mph Estimates were made for 1985 (the "base" year), 1989
(the current year), and 1991
V It should be noted the Washington State Department of Ecology is
intending to increase the stringency requirements of the State's
mandatory inspection/maintenance program later this year, the
effects of increased stringency will reduce emission rates even
more than anticipated by the MOBILE3 parameters used for this
analysis
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 4
ESfJ1UTED CARBON MONOXIDE EMIS'SlON RATFS FSTIMATED CARBON HONOXJDE EMISSION RATES
~ 7su
Avsralto YsAkls Speeda •o- Meo tat + is~ tos~ ~ s~es teU Lsos
40000 -0-6 at1 + f0 s~A -1! w~ + !0 n1► =3 ns1 4~ '
~
~
90GL0
P ~
r
a a ~
100"
~ E • . ~
~
a
~ . ~lJ
m ~
1713 1000 t963 1Y00 IW! •8.0 f00 13.D !OA 23C ~QO
Ysar h.a.c• r.ntu. sn«a, (ta enyh)
STEP 5 Estimate Carbon Monoxide Concentrations
CALINE3 was used with the estimates of PM peak hour traffic volumes
(see Attachment #t 2) produced by ENTRANCO CALINE3 requires total
volumes The results, and selected parameters, are summariaed on
page 2
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 5
~
ATTATC:HMENT " 1"
UNIYBRSITY AND SPRAGUB TRAFFIC GROWTH RSGRBSSION ANALYSES
8xponential Trend Line AnalyBis oY Bast Geg Traffic
I
10 1+ * * *
I
I -
I *
z * *
Y
io o+ .
I * .
I * •
I •
I •
I .
9 9+ * .
I
I
I
I
I *
9 *
I *
Y
Z
I *
I
9 6+ *
I . *
I
I *
I *
I *
9 4+
I =
I
I ~ * * *
I *
I . *
9 3+ *
I
58 3 63 9 68.4 73.0 77.6 82 1 86 7
Date (in 'decimal' form)
Mean oY X=?0 04 Correlation coefYiafent = 0.954 Yalid cases = 27
S D of X=? 39 Degrees of freedom = 25 Missing caeea = 0
Mean of Y= 9 67 Slope oY regreasion line = 0 036 Response X = 100
S D of Y= 0 28 Y intercept 130
Regresaion equation Y' = 0 036 X+ 7 130
Standard error of estimate for regreasion = 0 084
Standard error of correlation coefficient = 0 196
Significance of correlation coefficient = 0 000
~
w
ATTAT+CEIlMENT st1'l
UNIYBRSITY AND SPRAGUS TRAFFIC GROWTH REGRBSSION ANALYSES
8xponenti8l Trend Line Analyeis of Sast Leg Traffic
I
101+ *
I
I
I *
I * ~
I ,
10 0+
I ~
I
I
I .
9 9+ * .
I
I
I
Y
I *
9 7+ *
I *
x
I
I *
I .
9 6+ *
I *
I
I *
I *
I *
9 4+
I • ,
I
I** :k*
I *
I *
9 3+ . *
I
59 3 63 9 68 4 73 0 T? 6 82 1 86 ?
Date (ia 'decimal' form)
Mean of X=?Q 04 Correlation coePYicient = 0 954 Yalid caaes = 27
S D of X=? 39 Degrees oY freedom = 25 Miesing cases = 0
Mean of Y= 9 67 Slope of regreasion line = 0 036 ResponBe % = 100
S D of Y= 0 28 Y intercept 130
Regresaion equation Y' = 0 036 X+ 7 130
Standard error of estimate for regreasion = 0 089
Standard error of correlation coefficient = 0 196
Significance of correlation eoeYfieient = 0 000
f
UNIVERSITY AND SPRAGUE TRAFEIC GROWTH REGRfiSSION ANALYSES
Bxponential Trend Line Analysig of South Leg TrafPic
I *
9 4+
I
I
I
I *
I
9 2+ *
I *
I
I *
I * * *
I
9 Ot -
I
I
I •
I *
I * * •
8 7+
Y *
I -
I *
I *
I
8 5+ * *
I
I
I
I *
I
8 3+ I *
I
I * *
I
I *
8 0+ *
I
60 4 64 8 69 2 79 5 77 9 82 3 86.7
Date (in 'decimal' form)
Mean of X= 70 56 Correlation coefficient = 0 831 Yalid caees = 24
S D of X= 6 83 Degrees of freedom = 22 MiBBing cases = 0
Mean of Y= 8 69 Slope of regreBSion line = 0 054 Response X = 100
S D of Y= 0 40 Y intercept = 4 855
Regreesion equation Y' = 0 054 X+ 4 855
Standard error of estimate for regreseion = 0 145
Standard error of correlation coeff icient = 0 209
Significance of correlation coefficient = 0 000
~
UNIVBRSITY AND SPRAGUS TRAFFIC GR0WTH REGRSSSION ANALYSES
$xponential Trend Line Analyaie of West Leg Traffic
I
10 1+ *
I *
I * *
I *
I
I
10 0+ -
I
I
I *
I
I * *
9.9+ *
I
I
I
I
I *
9 8+ *
Y
I
I *
I *
x
9 6+ *
I * * *
I
Z * *
I
I *
9 5+ *
I
I * *
I .
I
I * *
9 4+ x~
I
59 3 63 9 68 4 73 0 77 6 82 1 86 7
Date (in 'decimal' Yorm)
Mean of X= 69 67 Correlation coefficient = 0 926 Valid caesa = 28
S D oY X= 7 51 Degreea oE treedclm = 26 MissinB caecs = 0
Mean of Y= 9 70 Slope of regressioa line = 0 028 ReBponse % = 100
S D of Y= 0 23 Y intercept 721
RegreBSion equation • Y' = 0 028 X+? 721
Stenderd error of eatimate for regreBSion = 0 085 -
Standard error of correlation coefficient = 0 192
Significance of correaataon coefficient = 0 000
c
~
HBRALD ROAD AND SPRAGUfi TRAFFIC GROWTH RfiGRESSION ANALYSES
Exporantial Trend Line Analysia of North Leg Traffic
I
6 9+ *
x
I
I
I
1
6 7+
I
I
I
I
I *
6 5+ *
- I ~
I
I Y ~
I
I *
8 4t *
I * ~
I
Y
I
I *
6 2t * * *
I *
I
I
I
I
6 0+ .
I
I
z*
Y
I
5.9+ ~
I
56 8 63 4 68 0 72 ? 77 3 82 0 86 6
Dete (in 'decimal' form)
Mean of X= 72 89 Correlation coeff icient = 0730 Yalid csaes = 16
S D of X=? 63 Degrees of freadom = 14 MieBing caaes = 0
Mean of Y= 6 32 Slope of regression line = 0 022 Responsa X = 100
S D of Y= 0 23 Y intercept = 4 748
Regression equation : Y' = 0 022 X+ 4 748
Standard error of estimate for regreBSion = 0 154
Standard error of correlation coefficient = 0 258
Significance oP correlation coefficient = 0 002
r
ti
UNIYERSITY AND SPRAGUIs TRAFEIC GROWTH REGRESSION ANALYSES
$xponential Trend Line Analysig of North Leg Traffic
I
9 1+ *
I
I
I
I *
I
8 8+ *
I *
I -
I ~ *
I *
I
8 6+
I * *
I
I *
I
I
8 3+ * *
I *
I *
Y
I
I * ~ *
6 0+ ~
I ~
I
I *
I
z
7 7+
I * *
I * *
I
I
I *
7.5+ *
I
58 8 83 4 68 1 72 7 T? 4 82 0 86 7
Date (in 'decimal' Porm)
Hean of X= 68 89 Correlation coefficient = 0 859 Yalid cases = 27
S D of X='1 60 Degreea of freedom = 25 Miseing caBeg = 0
Hean of Y= 8 23 Slope of reeresaion line = 0 050 Responae % = 100
5 D of Y= 0 45 Y intercept = 4703
RegreaBion equation Y' = 0 050 X+ 4703
Standard error of eBtimate for regreseion = 0 228
Standard error of correlation coeYYicient = 0 196
Significance of correlation coefficient = 0 000
„ 211
1gb9 'P11~ S~Q~'`l~~ M~n
~
O I
ik ~
~ ~ ~ ~ S~• ` s ~
r rA ~
~ ~ ~ ►
l.t
~r
ly
Y `
eaue _
l r ~ ~
~ -
-
~ .
-60
, ~ ~~►~n
~ -
_ ~
► ~
~ cn
o a~• ~R ,,~Q. , ~t,~s
~~SI ~ ~ ~ 93~ ' ~ s~+4
,f,,,,,.. ~~4 S ~ ~
.r-'~ : fi?a ~ ~ .
- ~ . t
_ n ~ 51 ~
~t lv
~
~ Clty
e
-
~econd Avelau
° ~
t~--- ~ ~
~/r ~V(, 1 •
~
~
~ ~
c
,
. ~ ~ •
~ ~ oInc.
Civfl Design and Land Plwining
DRA,INAGE ANALYSIS
FOR
UNIVERlSITY CITY SHOPPING MALL EXPAN3ION
Prepared June 7.1989 By: Mark Aroneon
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
W. 106 Misaion,l5uite 206
Spokane, WaBhington 99201
(609)328-3371
..R... _.~.~~~z~..~
y ~ E sCr,o ~
c Ea
' %'JN 0 81989
~
' 1*,rL ~ AE COUnrr E°%1%12}NEER ~
_ _ . . .
,
W 106 Mission Ave 0 Spokane WA 99201 ~(509) 328-3371
I
r '
.
This drainage analysis is intended as a supplement to the environmental checkhst
A detailed draunage plan and drainage report with hydraulic calculations, in
conformance with Spokane County's Guideluies for Stormwater Management, will
be submztted for Spokane County review prior to project deslgn completion The
following Para aPhs identify a brief descriptlon of the intended site drainage and
the procedures that will be used to accomplish the required analysis
All stormwater precipitation originating on this project and all stormwater run-off
naturally drauiing to his project will be collected and chverted to on site 208 drainage
percolatlon areas with clrywells These percolation areas and drywells will be sized
to handle precipitation and run-off in accordance with the Spokane County
Guideunes for Stormwater Management
The attached plan shows the project site. Preliminary storm drainage basms are
outlined on the plan as well as demolition areas and structural areas which will
remain The shaded areas (existing Frederick and Nelson, west portion of the mall,
JC Penney, and Newberrys) will require minor structural modification but the
unpermeable area of this shaded area will remain the same Therefore, we propose
to e].iminate this area from our 208 calculations
We anticipate roof drainage from the builchngs (central mall area, majors, and
parkuig garages) will be by interior piping to a buried storm sewer piping system
This piping system would be approximately 5 to 6 feet deep to avoid freezing We
anticipate the roof drainage from Area "A" as shown on the plan would be to the
south grass swale This swale would likely have some retainmg walls.
Area "B" consists of some parking and the east parkmg structure This area would
be drained by overland flow and interior roof piping to the swale along Universlty
R,oad
Area "C" would drain ground level parking by overland flow, north to landscaped
grass swales along Sprague Avenue Area C construction will require the removal
of existing pavement, regrading, and new surfacLng Area "C" may also include roof
drainage for the northern portion of the expansion if grades and interior plumbing
design allow
Area's "D" and "E" would be by overland flow to the grassed swales Again new
construction would likely require regrading and surfacing We anticipate paved
areas to be graded from 1% to 5% slopes
The methodology used for design will be as outlined in Guidelines for Stormwater
Management pubhshed by Spokane County Engineers
In accordance vcnth Soils Survev, Spokane Countv WashinLrton, 1968, the soll on this
site ls identif'ied and categorized as
GgA - Garrison Gravelly loam, classified as gravelly, medium textured,
somewhat excessively drained soils formed m gravelly glacial deposits.
Uruversity City Shoppmg Mall Expansion - Draunage Analysis June 7, 1989
Page 1
r
~
See the Sofls Map Exhibit "B" on the following pag e Garrison Gravelly loam
is one of the soils identified in the Guidelines for Stormwater Management as
acceptable for rywells The rate of flow is 3 CFS for single depth drywells
and 10 CFS foradouble de th
P drYwells.
R.AINFALL Data used for design will be in accordance with Exhibit "C" on the next
~age which is an excerpt from the Guidelines for Stormwater Management, by
pokane County EngRneers A 10 year return frequency event will be used.
RUN-OFF Control will be overland flow off the new parkuig lots and storm piping
system off the roofs into new 208 areas and rywellsin Existing roofs (shown as
shaded on the lans) will drain clirectl to dr'Ywells with the arkinare
P Y p g as Grass
percolation areas will be sodded for erosion control
Grass percolation (208) areas will be sized to accommodate 1/2-inch of run-off from
the new surfaces
Drywells wffl be sized to handle the total run-off flow in their respective basins
beyond the storage capacity of 1/2-inch off unpervious surfaces. This will be
accomphshed by using the Bowstring method to analyze the run-off. Drywell lids
will be set at an elevation allowing percolation of the first 1/2-inch of run-off prior to
overflowing into the drywell.
Piping, clitching, and capacities will be verif"ied to insure adequate flow.
The above described system of stormwater control will provide the necessary
quantity and qualit controls, as outlined i.n the Spokane County Stormwater
Manazement Guide or this project.
University G'ity Shopping Mall Expansion - Drainage Analysis June 7, 1989
Page 2
5
•
~
~ N
1
~o0 50 0 ~oa zoo ~ ~
SCALE FEET
°a ~ o O
a ~ z o ~ z
0 ~
~
_ I _ SPRAGUE AVENUE _ ~ _ _ _ - - - - - - -
I I
~ ' ~ i + ~ ,q ~ ,o~
/ ! t/1LW~IS ` ~ ` ~ ° 1q0 ~ P ~ , Pa~ ~ ; -ro e~ . r ~g , C , ~ ~ ~ saao F ~ . ~S ' 98 , , , ` p'", . /
~€~--~1 , ~ ~ ~ . ~ , , ~ , . _ _ -
_ . c ~ ~ '~a , . . . L E G E N ~ a c ~ ~ LEGENO
J ~ , - ` , ~ ~ _ - - ~ ~ ~E , 4 . - w~w , DRAINAGE BQSIN
' ' ' KING ` PE / IJ// .ll ~ - . 1 ~1 3 . ~ ~ D 0 ` r UCTURE I , PERIN{ITER
, , . , a , ~ 120,00~ $,F _ . 5 LEVEIS • ' r J ' - _ . ~ ~ ~OR 2 . ~ - - 2i PM- t . `ses - - - ` _,a / DI 208 STORM ~ DRAIN SWALES
SQ00 - - .7 G 120 OQO $ F _ '"I ' ' U ~ ~ - I . , ~ s. '7 ~ ~ r ~ ' J . , ~ _ , ~ ~ .
. ~ > . . A . , ~ , , . „ J ~ . , ( ~ . ` t. ; ~j `t ~~y - . ~i ~ L--~ ~ , `Y ~"r t . - 1988 - ` A Bi O BASiN NAME
~ 1' ~ f . / . , . '~se ~ NEW PARKING ~ : . t -4. ,-~'r'~','~ , r ~ - • , . ~ • , , 9 I '~j~5'' ~^i ~ I tit~T~ t , ~ f4jl~~ P. ~':tf~ _ ~ ~ STRUCTURE ~ . ' ` , ~ • , . ,
o . ~ _ 5 LEVELS . :9~~$QQ S~~~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~p~~~y~~` , o 1' ` ~~tia~A i~.~~': , ~,f~~-, ~ DEMOL ION k~~, t~~~ ~ _ a R_ , I `7`~M`~, t ~ e < , ; ~ + + . , ,
~ ' L 11 Cf1Y WESi A 1~ 61~SQ1~ ; K ' ' ~ ti'~"• : ~~d.~ .~h QREA ' . r ~ 4° . _ , : ~ ~ ~~~>~,o • -s~, B • ~ { LDG TO BE T~ r, c I~~ ~ ~ 5 B ti 1 ~ i ~ fr ^ . ~ rtt ♦ , ~ 4,.~rn _
~9 REMOVED , : . `}~h,,~ ~ Rei~y ~p~r ~ 1 ~ . . ~p 9~~ I I } ~ - , ~ ) , ,4~;4`~ Gl~~~~{S~A? . ' QY y ~l~M~~, ' rj~v""~"~~~ti a ` . • ~ ' 1 • ~ ~ t ~ 1 ~ ~ z'~ ~ v ~ 3 , ~ ' , , ' t ~ ~~R}11 ~ . , t • ` % ~'R - ` _ ~ ~ 8~-, ~
~ L , , , , 4'~? ~ , , ~ ~ , , L - • ~c~ ~~1~. ' r V y J 1~~~~ LI ~ ~ ~ ~ I t ~ t T~1 K(R{ ; ~ y PAD 3 . . r xf~ ~n~r. . , , . ' ~ : • r : 1 ,
I J - ~7 ~ ~ f,ae h ` q OOd~ _ r . ^ " r / , . iJ , . . , I I ' " ~ _ . , - - • ; . . . 1 / '
_ , E _ _ , , . . , , , . . . , , ~ . , ~ i~a i C , • ~ ~ iy89 ' r 3
i !9g).9~ 19~5 . . ~a~ ~A$ m , ~ - JOf . , - . ~ ~ , i . ~ . - ~ . t9s~ - - - ~ ~00 .1992 - ~ . . ~ . ' . - - SEf~ttND~VENUE~ ~ _ ' " ' a _ .
~~'~p~8"^ ~ ~ ~ • . - ' l~ Pfl~tt~l~4G , . , :19q3r - - ` ~ ~ . - ~y ~itU~`NRE ~ ~ ~ 99 ~ ~ :'~f ' ~4 LEYEI.$ ~ • ~ .
. ~ - . ~ , ~ ~ , ~ , . - ~ r' _ ""r . ' ~ ~ ` ~ " " r', . ~ ~ i
. , - ^ r--- ~ , ; -~r i ~ . ~ , ~ ~ a] ~ . i ~ - . ~ ` - ~ • - . . - i' ~2
. , `~1 ~ ~ , " I ~ . ~ l 1 \ . . . . _ ~ ~ . . ~
~ ; ~ ~ 1488 . . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~J . - ~ , ~ , , ~ 489.._ . ' - • ~ , • _ . , t ~ ~ ' - ^
. _ ; ~ ` ~ t J9 . ~ ~ . • . - . , 9j • , - ~
. ~ , ` ~ . ~~y~ ~ ~ ' ~ , , ~ • ~ l993 - - - }
, . . '!99 . - , N - ~ ,~99 t' • . , 1 J 1gy , ' ~
. - ' . ~s , y . ~ ~ . '~~oop~~s ~ .
~
~ ' REVISIONS ~
Taylor Eng~weermg a.u aeo .r ti.w neermg .6 rkaw
SITE DRAINAGE PLAA DWN DATE APP CK D D~1E APP INAGE PLAN
`voi. 17 28PA6EI994
,
y .,05jL802(;2
~ ,ti
Univereity Road - CRP 2452
Map No 3
/ RF Nos. 1292 & 1201 "I"
Parcel No. 95201.0108
~
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIGN OF ENGINEERING
Spokane County, Washington
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
THE GRANTOR Univereity City, Incorgorated, A Waehington Corporation for and in
consideration of Mutual Henefits, receipt of which ie hereby acknowledged, conveys
and warrante to Spokane County, a political eubdivieion of the State of Waehington,
the following described real estate, eituated in the County of Spokane, State of
Washington:
Portion cf Aasessors Parcel No. 45201.0108
That portion of elock222 of OPPORTUNITY, as per plat thereof recorded in
Volume "K" of Plate, Pagee 20, 22 and 23 lying Eaeterly and Northeasterly
of the following deecribed line:
BEGINNING at a point on the 3outh line of elock 221 of which point ie
42.00 feet West of the Southeaet corner of said block; thence Northerly
and parallel with the East line of eaid block, a distance of 620.23 feet;
thence Northwesterly, a dietance of 23.08 feet to a point on the North
line of - 1 ? f tt,;,.-,
~
_ . _ _ . . . . . ' . . . . _ _ 1 . . . . . ' _ . . . _ ' . ~ . . . . . _ . . . . . L " ` _ _ '
(NE 1/4) of SecLicn 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, w.M., Spokac~•:
County, Waehington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, th undereigned haa caused this inetrument to be executed on
thia day of , 1994
, .
e UNIVERSITY CITY, INCORPORATED
; .
95j)C(;070 A WASHINGTON CORPORATION
Excise Tax Paio -
7 1 66 /1 mt. Pd n B SI S r. ~
, .
T e w~-
-a e Coun~ty
~f` ' Sp, /
. . g ~
. f n
/ G BY :
l
STATE OF WASHINGTON ~
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) as
I certify that I know or have eatiefactory evidence that
6,yare) the individu ~ who appeared before me, and said individualj,e~
a owledged t (he ehe/they) eigned this instrument, on oath etate that
he she/they) was r authorized to execute the inetrument and acknowledged it
the of Univereity City,
Incorporated, A Washington Corpo ation to be the free and voluntary act of such
party for the usee and purpoees mentioned in the inetrument.
Dated thie day of A4 , Al 19967
Nota Public In d for the State of Waahington,
residing at Spokane.
My appointment expiree 'Z ~
ewducit /sam le/'boach/) " ~
Y P ] P
~
i
~ i
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDIN,ANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11 10 230 (3) Nbngated Determmation of Nonsigmficance (MDNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
FILE NO(S) ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87, VE-38-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Zone reclassificaaon from Commercial (C) and Multiple
Farmly Suburban (IvIFS) to Regional Busuiess (B-3), a change of pnor conditions of approval
to allow structures to be located on ground previously lunited to par~ng lot(s); and a vanance to
allow fewer parkuig spaces than requu~ed by zoiung regulations all associated wnth a major
expansion/remodeluig of University Shopping Center from a commuruty shopping center to a
regional shopping center
PROPONENT Winvest Development Co c% Stanley Schultz
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY
Generally located south of Sprague Avenue between Walnut and Uruversity Roads, in the
Spokane Valley in the N 1/2 of Section 20, Townslup 25 N, Range 44, EWM, Spokane
County, Wastungton, University Clty Shopping Center
LEAD AGENCY SPOKANE C4UNfiY
The lead agency for thus proposal has determ.uled that it dces not have a probable sigmf'icant
adverse unpact on the envuonment if nutigated as sapulated below. An Envunnmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is n,gt required under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after
review of a completed envuonmental checlclist and other vlformation on file with the lead
agency This information is available to the public on request
This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2), the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarduig this
MDNS must be subnutted no later than 4.00 p m., August 22nd, 1989, if they are
intended to alter the MDNS
MITIGATIN G MEAS 1RES.
I acknowledge and agree to all the nutigating measures per the attached memorandum dated June
21, 1989 (from the office of the County Englneer) to the moclif'icahons and adjustments to the
above descnbed proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures
in the future
Date ~l Pnnted/T,yped Name. Stanle,y Schultz. AtSorne,}r for WinvqW
J Develonm= Com ,~yn
~„gnature
Resnonsible Official by Thomas G Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
Posiaon/I'itle Spokane Countv Senior Planner Phone. (509) 456-2205
Address N 721 Jefferson St,-apokang, WA 926„Q
Comments regarding environmental ce s wel o e t the g
DaLe Issued. Ju1x25, 1989 Sign a(tire
*
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after i be omes final, may be made to Spokane
County Planning Department, at N 721 Jefferson S pokane, WA 99260 The appeal
deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadluie, being ten (10) calendar days after
the sigrung of the Decision This appeal must be wntten and make specif'ic factual objectiong
Contact the Planni.ng Department for assistance vvith the specifics of a SEPA appeal,
A copy of the NIDNS was mailed to•
1 WA State Department of Ecology(41ympia)
2 WA State Department of'Transportation(Olympia)
3 Spokane County Air Pollution Comtrol Authonty
4 Spokane County Health Distnct '
5 Spokane County Shenff s Office
6 Spokane County Budding & Safety
7 Spokane County Utihaes
8 Spokane County Engmeers
9 Plannmg Manager-City of Spokane
l n Fue Distnct No 1
11 Modem Eiectnc Water Company
12 Valley Garbage Service
~
r,
' I
r !
+ t OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOk ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
June 21, 1989
To: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning
Administrator)
Fram. S ~-kane Count ~ ~
' p y Engineer s Department
1 ,
,
I Subject: Conditions of Approval Zone Chanqe No: ZE 18-89
Applicants Name Winvest Development Co
Se c t ion 20, Townsh i p 25 N, Range 44 EWM
.
re: Zoninq
The fallowinq Mitigating Measures are submitted for inclusion in a
Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (MDNS) for the above
referenced zone change proposal. These mitigatinq measures are
necessary to mitigate traffic adnd other impacts directly related to a
project of this magnitude. The requirements presented herein are
based upon trip distribution data provided to the County Engineer by
the enqineer for the propased development. Authority tor the
imposition af these requirements is found within the State
Environmental Policy Act and Beard of County Commissioners Resalution
SO -1592 .
In addition to including these requirements in the MDNS, we request
that they be presented in the Rlanning Report to the County Hearing
Examiner Committee. They should be made Conditions of Approval
should the proposal be approved by the Committee at the public
hearing scheduled Julv 20,, 1969.
Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as
praposed:
1. App 1 i cant sha 11 pet i t ion the Board of County Commissioners for
the vacation of Dartmouth Road from Sprague to the Milwaukee
Raad R. O. W.
2. Applicant shall dedicate right of way along University Road
consistent with the plan view of the alignment which is attached
and made a part of the record. The right of way dedication is
as follows:
1. A 22' x 24' triangle at the northwest corner of #2,
2. 39' from the existing R.O.W. far 186' south of #1,
3. A transitian from 39' ta 27' fram the existing R. 0. W.
for 2E6' south of #21
4. 27' from the existing R. O. W. fc,r 140.61 south of #3,
5. A 27' x 27' triangle at the southwest carner of #4
ZE 18-89 page 2
6. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Fngineer.
7. Applicant shall improve University Road west of the section
line, fram Sprague Ave. to their south property line in ,
accordance with the approved typical}cross section(s) on file
with the County Engineer's Office. The plan view of this
alignment is attached and made a part of the record.
8. Applicant shall improve the Sprague'Ave. - University Road
intersection as necessary, including upgrading or replacing the
existing signal system, to conform to the required improvements
to University Road south of Sprague Ave.
9. Applicant shall construct a second west bound left turn lane on
Sprague Ave. at University Road as recommended in the traffic
impact study. _
10. Applicant shall construct a free right turn lane on University ~q
Road, South of Sprague Ave., as recommended in the tr8ffic
impact study. '
~c -F~~ 9~aJ ey s~.s►
` a~ 1~ Hir ~.rs l~ A~ J=Da'>r4-3P r 6r 44. t a v rr~ht a~•~ Lys~..1' co r~~w`~~s
11. Applicant shall construct a new signal system at 4th Ave. on 9~'~i4Ac
University Road, as recommended in the traffic impact study.
12. Applicant shall construct channelization modifications on
Sprague Ave. as recbmmended in the final approved traffsc
circulat4on and parking plan.
13. Applicant shall relocate or reconstruct the existing Felts Road
traffic signal on Sprague Ave. as recommended in the final
approved traffic circulation and parking plan.
14. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage artd access plans for the required
improvements.
15. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane Gounty Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water dssposal
plan for the entire project or portion thereaf if the
develc►pment is phased.
lE. A parking plan and traffic circulatioh plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accc,rdance with standard engineering practices. Paving or
surfacinq as approved by the County Engineer will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled bv vehicles
c l
2E 18-89 page 3
17. The construction of the raadway impravements stated herein shall
be accamplished as approved by the SpoDkane County Engineer.
~
18. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washinqton Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date Lf canstruction,
unless otherwise approved by the Cou`nty Engineer.
19. Access to the former Milwaukee Raad Riqht of Wav shall be
prohibited, both from the site and from Walnut Road.
20. Raadway standards, typical raadway settions and-drainage plan
-requirements are found in Spakane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
25. All required construction withln the existing or proposed public
right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a
building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall
be filed with the County Engineer.
Nt
i ~ .
~
i ~
~ I I
I ~ ~ {
i l47 ' ' ' E
~
i ~ ` -
• ~ t~~,6' ~ i ; ~ ~ ~
, - ,
y ~ ~ f ' ~ ;~►/„D~j~l ~~~~Q~ ' -
~
~ • ~I ►
~ _ ~~1~ I , ~ ~ ~ G _
. . . ..„.T ..w~.,..,...~ ~
W t..~..~
~ ` ~ 1 I I r I M I ~r ( I
~
, ~ ~ ~ , ~ a,~ ,
~ -
~
~
I ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ I I \
i
i
I I I I ~
I
~ ~ t 1
I ~ 1
f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ yp
I ( ~ ~
I ~
~ h,
~ , 0
~
~
. ~
J • { / ~O ~ •
~
GA KE !`t'_N P c,~t CA vN rV 6v..~
,
C7,cm-y _G. 4+ +J Q~ ~ _ ~_../'.r.,., _ _ / ` _ ` y ~ _
►1 ~ 11 ' /r
1\~!C ~ , . • - _
_ ' r
t
_ Ja _ ! I
. ~t .
~ . ~ _ ~ . - . . . - -
JQ
~
331L
~1-r~.'~..-, ~~s---~ L ~ ~ s s , ~ ~l.~- 5 6 - ~ s _ _ .
~ , ~ ~~,.1 , ~ ~ J.~ . ~~.....9 _ ~ _ _
,
_
J ' ~ t `ar
1
S
-.~~r . .~.,,.e....~.~ a~• ~~x«i+.n ~ . - • . -
~
~ .ti•' _ w = ~ ..w ~ _ ~.ca+~~-,.~...~.-r w~...~~r v _ , ' _ ~
r
_ _ ~ ^ _ ° _ _ _ » . _ ,.......p- ~ _ _ _ --•._.e.,..._._..._ , .r _ _
4
~
, r
r
d
UNIVERSITY CITY
PROJECT REVIEW
AGENDA
February 9, 1990
1 Project Phasing
2 Traffic/Road Improvements
a What is status of road improvements addressed in contract
rezone document?
b How do we bond required work that won't be complete pnor to
building permit issuance?
c Other Issues
3 Approval Process
a Pre-Construction Phase
•How does Spokane County handle coordination with Winvest?
Do we have a dedicated contact person?
•What steps required to reach site plan approval?
•What parking issues are yet to be resolved?
•Utility issues
•Environmental issues
•Other concerns
b Permitting Phase
•What is required to secure demo permits? How long?
•What is required to secure grading and utility permits? How
long?
•What is required to secure building permits? How long?
•Do you allow fast tracking permit process?
c Construction Phase
•What testing and inspection do you require?
•What inspections does the County perform?
•What is the process for changes to approved plans after
construction has commenced?
4 Utilities
a Electrical
-What's required for relocation of existing primary power
lines?
b Water
•What does the City require for fire protection?
•Are there any fire flow fees required to be paid?
c Sanitary Sewer
d Other Issues
VE-jo,380089
_ g7
.
_g9 zv"E;08
.
1$ - ~
~ ~ I r T A
r . ~ 1r. ~ a r
i ~
7 L Y
v . Q
4 .
C
~ ~
1► ~ 3 , ~ a
o
r '
4
4 ~
~
~ O ~,..t••''"' a C r N~ X r
~ ff +',,,,,~„~ji
Av£
t.A
3o
N ~ j' M~►~~,.r- Q Rw4R st OC7
.
~ .
~ ; ° 14a
: t ~ ~ E t 312'~` ~
F%r i3 R,QAD
~ v
wAUKEE RAlOAQ
~ ~I I L
s= ~ ~
_ ' ' /►V £ t ~ at
~ 4'1 ~ T
[
!
pVE t i ~ M ~ SE~EN7t~
.
~ ~ t t► y 7
. •
1 ~ ~N i T T4 ~
ot J .
, Q n w ~~H 9ra
9 TH
Er 6 Z
. ► o r
R NENY Z
~ j is-
~ Z ~
~ prh ~►'f _ JL7M ~ 2 N •
0 4 ~r
h rI ,~•t ' A~,i~ ~ ; 1 .1004
~ . ,
V
~ 4 ~ ~ ~ s~+~°*- ~ 3 ,
1 ~ (i•`t . ' a ~ U
1
~ VEN038-89
Z~E-54 _ ,1~ x c ,
AZEwl8--89 -g~
Y~ p `
J t t• i~JG 4
x . / ~)Irf'1 re-Y Y94'~8 L r 0 1 d
~ A. .V G:1,/ rr~
. C 1 ~ {A ~ • ~ ~ ~ ; , V Ib 1 I
y
- _ ~ • ~ ~ _y~~~ ~
` i4 UM GN M C 1- , f .
st
_
p ~ + Q ~ •
~ 54 siKiT CO
tj
z ~ MW~ 17S4 a -1 - -
r ~
~
. - • a TMfiJ 34S0 39 1" C
R ♦2 _ t - 9' A w Z ~ : ~ A4 ,
" ER j
) Q 'f • T. !ti'A-
s.-
~ ~ a .
C
. Q f]
/ nl
- 6- 5q-'?! v59~69C
D ' . ~
-G
N
-r -
IL
1NFS ~ 7 67t ,38'-&Zc ~ 155-79C I/6- 62 ~
. ~ ~ e
ar-~9 v@ 3 ~ AC ~ ~ - . • r .
I s, F-~r . , ~
~ t 8
~
v ~
86
A6l
' b - ~v a ,~,*'~z~ ~ ~,,~i~.~ ~ fiL"a~.~.r, :"~:~~•w~ .i~'~' f~~Y~~,,,,, ` f ~ • ~t i
= v, s ~q ta.V„3S,y"~~ ~+S '~y 3 x°~3•~ ^~~~~t4F~ xO' r } ,ix'`$ • V
~S. ; ..ux~ r 2 ~ ^ ♦ ' ~ ♦
. • .~s ; a•„ W~ ,f ~ ` '~r,. ~a ~;~s,,~,,..~.'" ~
38-57
W
~aA « ~,c t
z,~
1)"~ .A~2 . DGo ay c^"'
~ r'~ ~ ~ ~~~y'.!s'~ ~1~` ti^S~ ;p fj r jroe~~~ad~ a• ~ i ~ ~ ~
.y.r~ ` Y ~^Ct ~ Mf ~ZPf~^~ >}.t ~ n!Y < ~ S
LG -Z7 Ta. s _ ~e~~'`~,c~.. ..e~-y~t~ i a~%N;a r•n or r, s .ra
` ,,,si ,.r;• Y'$r .~~y ~ x~*'~'~~Y~°`~ ~.w V ~ ' ~ h~ ~~.,'W'~a.. ♦ 't" ~ 't ~ r-
t /I~► a'< S, .+ix X.7= c~~.~. ~ " V ,~"~A~'~, " 4. ~~.~i~
~ r'~a~~01 ~r• w ~,~t~ ..c v~F+~~ rrk ~ ~ Q •
r ~
Q~ fJ p~
~ TQ Qx
~ „ q>?F ~ „ nt ~'°'o as f~oi ^ ,~yf►~.~C`' ~r A Y,f ' ~ ti ! .
r~SM~£X'~,,,~, A MFS
~ ♦ u ~.~t C
} ASaM1~`~~"°~ ~ySS -3l-V8
~~a'~-i~ .c t c c
~ ~ ` f, `~.~r~ „y~y~✓' 4 rt S-. r n. 1,70 -7l~I/~j S a
, ~ i j f ' ~ .a : C {J • • ~ ~ - ~ ' ~ YS
7 - ~
` A'✓^ _ - ► , ~ `fW ~ F r 4? cn v
31-68 ~w •.3 b , . ~ 31-6q
F - L F ~ t
~ ~ ^
e
M
. 2ic ~.r
• - ---.t~ " ' ~ `Q ~
A
22 -bC 82 c
J~?
~ • w 1` o t s ,s ♦
Z L;,.
0 1
. ~ ~
~
/
~
s
<
~
c
<
~ Y
3 ~ U
ti
z
IIlA0Y1 AYINUI , •
. , ~
~ A t
KAJoR I
r.u
111oH MxLL tmo/1 WW INN U
~ iuo rNOI~ I O O O~
soon MAJoR 2
~ IXUiINO
/ttDltlCR ~1p
r„ I I i5 U ~ NILION ~t 1~ /~NIf
clM,W ~ I~ I 1
v ~ L
op W
\ wy w r
~ r1M~ Y A~ ^
1 ~ ~ 'L~ ~ ~ •
~11 ~Y Y V • IY11
rlfl~ ~r M~~1 ~~11
111COMD AVtMU/ UOMt 01 WAY
w~r.r wr~r ~~~1
~~W ~Yr1I w,~1~1 x
Y Mr11 M~Y11
~M Lr MI ~ I W Y~ ~ I
~g
•
VZ
~
1
w i H v E 5 r 4 U N I Y E R S I T Y C I T Y S H O P P I N G C E N T E R SPokane, Washington
,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: August 24, 1989
SUBJECT• Rezone #ZE-18-89, from Commercial (C) and Mulu Family
Suburban (NiFS) to Regional Business (B-3)
Change of Cond.itions #ZE-50A-87, a change of pnor conditions of
approval to allow structures to be located on ground previously hrruted to
parking lot(s)
Vanance #VE-38-89; Variance to allow fewer parking spaces than reqwred
by Zonmg Regulanans.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Wmvest Development Company
Agent Stanley Schultz
Proposal: To pernut expansion/remodel of Uruversity City Shoppmg Center provichng
approximately 450,000 of additional retail area, cinema and food court, also
- construction of pariang structures.
Location. Generally located south of Sprague Avenue between Walnut and University
Road, and north of the reahgnod Niilwaukee Road nght of way.
III. SITE ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan: Category is Ma}ar Commercial and Urban.
Inside General Sewer Sesvice Area (GSSA) Boundary
Inside Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary
Inside Urban Impaci Area (UTA) Boundary
The site hes wiihin two Comprehensive Plan categones, ie Major Commercial
and Urban. 'Ihat partian of the site wnffiun the Urban category was approved to
Regional Business (B-3) zornng in 1988 for expanded parking associated with
the shopping center. The Heanrig Examiner Committee considered this area
north of the reahgneti Mlwaukee Road nght of way as a transinonal area per the
defimtion of the Comprehensive Plan
The entire 37.245 acre proposal to Regional Business (B-3) zoning for a major
shopping oenter is oonsistent vnth the Comprehensive Plan guidelines such as,
being at least 30 acres in size, market of at least 150,000 population, at least
300,000 sq ft of leasable area and a sernce area of at least 10 rrules
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-6
This zone change is consistent vnth the trend of more intensive
zorung between Sprague Avenue and the Milwaukee Road
alignment being established since the early 1950's
Land Use
Existing on SITE Uruversity City Shopping Center and other retail space
To the NORTH Retail, offices and fire station.
To the SOITTH Spokane Transit Authonty tra.nsfer site and single family
residences.
To the EAST Reta.il and vacant
To the WEST• Auto sales and retail.
Land uses between Sprague Avenue and the Ivhlwaukee Road
nght of way reflects the zomng trend idennfied above. The
rezomng of thus site to Regional Busvness (B-3) vvlll require the
proposal to camply with current development regulations which
vvill unprove its appearance.
Site Characteristics•
Site Size Approximately 37.245 Acres
ExisnnEr Buildines• Uruversity City Shoppmg Center and other retail spaces
To MraRhy FlaL
AQncultural Summarv: The Majar C'onnmercial and Urban categones of the
Comprehensive plan are not mtended to pmtect agncultural
land.
AdioininQ Streets: Sprague Avenue to the narth of the
site is a 110' foot County nght of way unproved with 7
lanes, sidewalks and curbs.
Uruve,rsity Road to the east of the site is a 70' foot County
nght of way impmved vnth 41anes, sidewalks and curbs
Milwaukee Road nght of way to the south of the slte is a
100' foot nnimproved County nght of way
Proposed Site Plan:
Use Expand/remodel Uruversity Gity Shopping Center.
Provosed Buildings: 3 Future builduig pads and 1 shopping center.
Slte Coverage 55 8~'0
Total R=1 Aru: 1,009,516 sq ft.
Total Floor Area: 904,778 sq. fL
Total Common or Public Area 155,700 sq fL
Building HelghA: Apprnximately 42 ft.
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A- 8
Parking Vanance• The most recent site plan subrrutted (August 14, 1989), by
the apphcant does not provide parking calculaeons nor does
it specify the exact number of spaces requesang a vanance
However, in talking with the appllcant's legal council, he
indicated that the project would provide 4,438 parking
spaces (by both parking garages and open parlang) The
Zoning Code requims 1 space per 200 sq ft of gross retail
floor area (revised site plan indicates 1,009,516 sq ft )
which equals 5,443 requued spaces Adnvnistrative
processes would allow a reduction of 284 spaces thereby
requuulg 5,159 parlang spaces or a vanance request to allow
a further reducuon of 721 spaces The apphcant should
address t}us issue to the sansfacuon of the Heanng Examiner
Committee at the pubhc heanrig
The sponsor's agent subrYUtted studies to the file which
provide varying pariang standards for shopping centers
These include a study done by the Urban Land Insatute
entitled "Parking Requirements for Shopping Center
Summary Reconnmendanons and Research Study Report,"
Also an amcle from the Amencan Planning Associaaon ntled
"Parlang Standards - Problems, Soluaons, Examples " As a
very general summary of these studies it rs recognized that
different commumties and their hfestyles will warrant
different pariang standards It notes that as a community
better ut&zes altematives to automobile transpartation
methods or programs such as nde sharing, van pooling,
mass transrt, flexible wark-hour schedules and bicycle
pariang faciliaes; these parking alternatives inay be
considered as an assurance that spill-over parking will not
adversely effect adjacent residenrial smeets. The Plammng
Department has recommended pedestrian access be provided
to the STA transfer site located to the south and that bicycle
racks and/or storage areas be designed into the Master
Development Plan at major enua.nces to the shopping center
I V. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
NOTE: The apphcant has submitted 2 very general site plans showrng very
different development concepts for the proposal, both of which do not provide
neoessary uiformation to enable detailed review and comment reganding design,
buffenng, landscaping, signage, structure height, buflding coverage, setbacks,
parlang, and other site plan considerations
Therefore in all instances any final site plan approval would have to meet the
standards of the Zonmg Code Some of these requuements are reiterated below
for clanty along with recommendations for vanous conditions the Planning
Departcnent feels are necessary due to the scale and impacts of ttus large Regional
Shopping Center
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-9
Heighl Maximum height in the B-3 Zone is 60 feet with lower heights required
adjacent to other vanous zoning types.
LiQht and Glare• Any special hghang techniques incorporated into the shopping
center would have to be approved through a specific lightmg plan and comply
with the Auport Overlay Zone
Signagg Due to existing sign pollunon along Sprague Avenue, the Planning
Deparnnent is recommending a total of 4 detached signs for the center which
would allow one detached sign adjacent to each pubhc street nght of way
bordering the site. Said signs shall be luiuted to 250 sq. ft in sign area and 40 ft
in height above grade as required by the B-3 Zone.
Phasing• That pnor to issuance of any buildulg pernuts on site, the apphcant shall
subuut for review and approval by the Planning Duector or at his discretion at a
pubhc hearing before the Heanng Examiner Committee, a Master Development
Plan. The Master Developtnent Plan would be utlhzed to coordvnate construcuon
pbases and be in conformauce to the conditions of approval and the standards of
B-3 Zone.
Landscarnng: Compliance wnth all landscaping standards of the Zonuig Code
shall be provided wnth required 208 stormwater dramage areas located adjacent to
County nght of way or as approved by the Plannuig Duector Said landscaping
and 208 areas may be combined as permitted by the Planning Director and the
County Enguieer.
Aesthetics: In desigmng the Master Development Plan the Plannuig Department
wlll look for general conformance to aesthetic concepts either presented or
t pmposed by the sponsar at the pubhc heanng. These aesthetic benefits may
~ include additLonal landscaping adjacent to buildings, s~pecial major enaance
trearments vo the builduigs and parking faciliaes wtuch comply wnth fire and
traffic iequirennents and pedestnan access to the STA Transfer site. The
pedestrian acoess to the STA Transfer slte is of pamcular inlportance in hght of
the paridtig variarx;e requested by the sponsor.
Circulation/Access: As conditioned by the County Engineers condiaons and the
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificanoe included under Section VII of the Report.
Stormwater Dcainage: The proposal shall comply wnth the County's "208" Stormwater
Drauiage Regulations as determuied by the County Engmeers Department.
Sewage Disposal: The proposed will make connection to the Valley Sewer
Water Supply: The proposal is wnthui Modern Electnc Water Company service area
although sausfactAry arrangements have not been made to provide service
Fire Protection: The prnposal is withm Fum Protecaon Distnct #1
Critical MaterialslUse Activity The proposal shall comply with the Aquifer
Sensiave Area Overlay Zone
8- 89 HEC S taff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-10
V. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Envinonmental Checklist along vnth P1ann2ng Department required Drainage
Analysis, Air Quality Impact Analysis and a Traffic Impact study was subrrvtted by the
sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review
considered the specif'cs of the proposal, other avaiIable ulformation, County
ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Condihons of Approval, the
Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County pohcies and guidehnes The
Curent Planrung Adnunistrator has deterrmned thai there are "probable sigruficant
adverse impacts" if the proposal were developed as proposed However, the apphcant
has agreed to s~pecific nuagating measures which should minun2ze or eluninate the
probable significant adverse impacts Therefore a Mitigated Deternunation of Non-
Sienificance ("MDNS") ha.s been issued. The specific nutigating measures include
Roadway ded.ication, unprovements and resignalization as more specifically
identified in the County Engineers memo dated June 21,1989, contained in the
Planning Department fi1e #ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87 and VE-38-89 and listed under
VII Conditions of Apprnval - County Enginneer Department.
The "NIDNS" checklist and required studies were circuiated to 12 other agencies of
junsdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for
review and comment The "MDNS" comment period ends August 22nd, 1989, and
was advatsed 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent
property owners withm 400 feet of the prvposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the
proposal site. The Heanng Fo;annuier may oonsider a,ddltional environmental related
testimony and the "MDNS" at the pubhc hearing.
VI. PLAN1vING DEPARTMEN'I' SUMMARY
The pr+oposed Regional Business (B-3) zone change for expanding and remodel of the
existrng Uruversity C`lty Shoppmg Center is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,
past zorung mends and existng l.and uses in the anea.
The requested vanance for reduction of required parldng spaves, as conditioned may be
approved if the Hearing Ecaminer Committee concurs vvith the submitted parking
studies and feels that the Spokane Community wrll ufthz,e alternaave transportaaon
methods to travel to the shopping center.
VII. CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL
A11 Conditioos imposed by tbe Hearing Examiaer Committee shalt be
binding on the "Appticant", which term sha11 include the owner or
owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.
COUNTY PLANNING DEPAItTMENT
1 That the following descnbed property shall be approved to the B-3 Zone and all
cutrent standards of the Zoning Code as amended shall be comphed with 2n the
development of this site
All those pomons of Tracts 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 and 228 of
Opportunity, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, pages 20, 21,
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-11
22, and 23, includsng all of the vacated Obelin Road, vacated Belfour Road and
vacated Second Avenue layuig within said tracts, except that portion of Tract 223
dedicated to Spokane County for Dartmouth Road, being more parncularly
descnbed as follows
Begmnmg at the Northeast corner of Tract 228, thence S 87° 09' 37" W along the
North luie of Tra+ct 228 a d.istance of 15.00 feet, to the true point of beglnning;
thence S 87° 09' 37" W continumg along the north line of Tract 228, a distance of
125.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southeast of a radius of
900 00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 29° 26' 35", an arc
d.istance of 462 45 feet to the beginnvng of a reverse curve concave to the
Northwest vnth a radius of 800 00 feet, a radial hne through said beginning of
reverse curve bears N. 32° lb' 48" W; thence Southwesterly through a central
angle of 29° 26' 57", an arc leogth of 411.19 feet to the end of curve, thence S. 87°
10' 09" W. a d.ista%:e of 379.85 feet to the begmmng of a curve concave to the
northeast with a radius of 800 00 feet, thence Northwesterly through a central angle
of 29° 25' 39", an arc length 410 88 feet to the begimmmg of a reverse curve
concave to the Southwest with a radius of 900 00 feet a radial hne through said
begimmng of reverse curve bears S. 26° 35' 48" W, thence Northwesterly through
a cental angle of 29° 26' 11", an arc length of 462 39 feet to a point on the South
line of Tract 224; thence S. 87° 09' 37" W along saud South hne of Tract 224, a
distance of 91.21 feet; thence N 2° 30' S3" W. along a lule being parallel to and
8 00 feet east of the West line of the east half of Tract 224, a distance of 443.56
feet, thence N. 87° 09' 32" E., a d.istance of 319.20 feet to a point on the West luie
of Tract 223,; thence N. 2° 30' 53" W. along the West luie of Tract 223, a distance
of 200 00 feet to the Northwest comer of Tract 223; thence N. 87° 09' 37" E. along
a South nght of way Iine for Sprague Avenue, a distance of 1,925.20 feet to a pomt
on the West right of wa}r line far Uruversity Road; thence S 48° 37' 28" E. along
the West right of way far University Road, a distance of 3174 feet, tbence S. 2°
30' S3" E, continuing along the West nght of way line, a distance of 621.56 feet, to
the true point of beguimng.
2 The Planning I?irector/designee shall approve a specific extenor lighting plan for the
approved area pnor to uistallation of such lightuig (Such plan shall axtempt to
confine illununarion to the area vvith full consideration to adjacent properaes)
3 The applicant sbalt develop sub}ect property generally in aocordance wl.thin the
concept presented to the Hearmg Examiner Comnvttee. Vanations, vuhen approved
by the Planning Director/designee, will be permitted, including, but not lunited to
the following change& building locaaon, landscape plans, and generaI allowabte
uses of the pernutted zone All vanations must conform to regulations set fortfi m
the ZONING LODE FOR SPUK:ANE COUN'I'Y. The onginai mtent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
4 The project is subject to Section 14 706, the Aqwfer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone
of the ZOIVING CODE FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY, which sets forth vanous
measures for Aqunfer protection, specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
d.isposal, spill protecnon measures, and stormwater runoff
5 The present proposal is not detailed enough to determine whether or not the use of
or matenals stored on the site are in comphance with Secuon 14 706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overiay Zone) of the Z0NING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-12
Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the sponsor/applicant shall be requu-ed to
file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thuly (30) days of the signuig of
Findings and Qrder of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Pubhc"
which shall provide in matenal as follows
PRIOR TO TBE IS SUANCE OF ANY BUII.DING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON 'IHE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHAi.L BE RESPONSIBLE
'FOR COMPLYING WTTH TBE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE FOR
SPOK:ANE COUNTY SECT'ION 14 706 (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA
OVERLAY ZONE) TBE PROPERTY WHICH IS TBE SUBJECT OF THIS
NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
6 Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerrung stormwater runoff
and provide necessary landscaping for runoff
7 Any dhvislon of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with
RCW 58.17 and the Spokane County Plamng Ord.inances pnor to issuance of
builciing penmits
8 The Spokane County Planrung Department shall prepare and record with the
Spokane County Auditor a"Tide Notioe" noting that the property in question is
subject to a vanety of speclal condhtions imposed as a result of approval of a land
use action Ttus '"Title Notice" shall serve as official pubhc notice regarchng
conditions of approval affecting the property in quesnon The '"Title Nouce" shall
be recorded witlun fifteen (15) days of final disposition of the approved land use
action and shall only be extinguished by the Spokane County Planning Department
The "Title Notice" shall generally pnovide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as (legal description and tnx parcel
number) is the subject of a land use action, imposing a variety of
special development conditions, by a Spokane County Hearing Body
or Administrative Official on (date) and as maybe amended, altered or
supplemented by offictal action or as already changed. File No. (Planning
Department File Number) is avaitable for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Planning Department.
9 A specific landscape plan, plantmg schedule and prvvisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Spokane County Planning Director/designee shall be submitted
with a perfonnance bond for the project pnor to release of building pernut.
COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Pnor To The Issuance Of A Bulidmg Pernvt Or Use Of The Provertv As Pronosed
1 Apphcant shall peution the Board of County Commissioners for the vacauon of
Dartmouth Road from Sprague to the Niilwaukee Road R O W
2 Apphcant shall dedicate nght of way along University Road consistent with the plan
view of the alignment which is attached and made a part of the record The nght of
way dedication is as follows•
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-13
1 A 22' X 24' mangle at the northwest corner of #2,
2 39' from the exisung R O W. for 186' south of #1,
3 A transinon from 39' to 27' from the exisang R O W. for 266' south of #2,
4. 27' from the exisnng R O W for 140 6' south of #3,
5. A 27' X 27' tnangle at the southwest corner of #4
3 Access pernuts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from
the Spokane County EngYneer
4. Apphcant shall improve Umversity Road west of the secaon line, from Sprague
Ave to theu south property luie in accordance with the approved typical cross
section(s) on file vsnth the Counry Englneer's Office. The plan view of this
alignment is attached and made a part of the record
5. Apphcant shall improve the Sprague Ave - Umversity Road ultersection as
necessary, including upgrading or replacing the existing signal system, to conform
to the requined unprovements to Umversity Road south of Sprague Ave
6. Apphcant shall construct a second west bound left turn lane on Sprague Ave. at
Umversity Road as recommended m the traffic unpact study
7. Apphcant shall construct a fr-ee nght turn lane on Umversity Road, South of
Sprague Ave , as recommended in the traffic impact study. In the event that the
County is unable to construct a traffic signal system of Umversity and Fourth as per
the current adopted 6 year construction program, then
8 Apphcant shall construct a new signal system at 4th Ave. on University Road, as
recommended in the traffic unpact study.
9. Apphcant shall construct channehzation modifications on Sprague Ave. as
recommended in the final approved traffic curulation and parlang plan.
10. Apphcant shall relocate or reconstcvct the existing Felts Roa.d traffic signal on
Sprague Ave. as recommended in the final approved t-affic circulation and parlang
plan
11. Apphcant shall submit far approval by the Spokane County Engineer roa.d,
drainage, and access plans for the requu+ed unprovements.
12. The apphcant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Enguieer and the
Spakane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan
and surface water disposal plan for the ennre project or any pornon thereot if the
development is to be phased.
13. A parking plan and auffic cuculation plan shall be subuutted and approved by the
Spokane County Enguieer The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be ui accordance vvith standand traffic engineenng practices Paving or
surfacuig as approved by the County Engineer, will be requued for any pornon of
the project which is to be occupied or uaveled by vetucles
,
14 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomphshed
as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
8- 89 HEC S taff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-14
15. All required unprovements shaU conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specificaaons for Road and Bndge Construction, and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions gertairung to Road Standards and
Strnmwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
16 Access to the forrmer Milwaukee Road Right of Way shall be prohibited, both from
the site and from Walnut Road.
17. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan reqiurements are
found in Spokane Board of County Comnussioners' Resolunon No. 80-1592 as
amended and are apphcable to this proposal
18 All requu-ed consuvcaon within the existmg or proposed pubhc nght of way is to
be campleted pnor to the release of a builduig permit or a bond m the amount
esnm,ated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of unprovements
shall be filed vvith the County Enguieer.
COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
,
1. Apphcant shaU svbm;t a revised water and sewer connection plan to be reviewed by
the County Utilitiess Deparunent
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shalt be as authonzed by the Duector of Utiliaes, Spokane
Couniy.
~ 2 Water service shaU be coardnated through the I?irector of Utihties, Spokane
County.
3 Water service shall be by an euisting pubhc water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services
4. A pubhc sewer system will be nnade available far the project, and individual sernce
will be pmvided to► each Iot pnor to sale Use of mdsvidual on-site sewage disposal
systems shaU not be authonzed.
5 The dechcatory ]anguage on the plat shaU state: "Use of pnvate wells and water
systems is prohibited."
CUUNTY BUIELDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1 The apphcant shail c.antact thc Deparement of Building and Safery at the earliest
possible stage of design/devclopment in order to be uiformed of Code requuements
admuustered/enforceci by the departcnent, e g, State Beuldhng Code Act regulations
such as requuements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street
address assignment, bamer-free regulations, energy code regulanons, and general
coordinabon witfi other aspects of project unplementation
8-89 HEC S taff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-15
. ~
, ' , •
~ , .
~ ~ • ~ : ~ ' ~ ` ~ ; { ' ' ' ;
~ ' ~ ~ , ' ~ : I ► .
I ! , 1 ~ ~ . i i • .
~ i , i ~ , i ~ ~ ( ~ I ♦ ~ t I
. I I ; I I ' ~ ~ I i , I , N
1
i ~ ~ • ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , 9h1 ~ ~ ~ •
. ; ty) 07
~ : • ~ ' i . i ~ I ~ , , , . 1~!
, i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ ~ , ~ ' . , ~
\ ~ ~ t i , ~ ~ . ' I f t I . I
, .
~.r ~ . ' ~
L' .l ~(~j~ .:~e."~•~ • 1;+ ♦w• •L •r'1':~'~r~' ^ r.•r••'~~~. ;1° .i.. ~..L. ' . •t`•~ ~0.6
i . ~ • :I v~ ~r~.1 y~ . • i.~' • •r • . ~ ..#v.. • ''V.. I'Y.
' ' 'f~r ~ ' ' ~ ' ~ . . i~. ~ ~ j.:wj•. , ~ . . ~i ~r • ~ ~ ' . . ~ .
. .:'f'. • ~ • • ~ 't . ' ' •
. . ~ ~ • , . • , ~d. - ~ • ~ . ~ . . • , . ~ ' ~
~ . I . . . •
W,UAR OW
, ~
>
co
~
)a"r
, o0
; ~ ~ ~ ; • ~t ~ ~j .:--~r : . ~ ~ _ . • y cr)
: • ~
! f t'. , ~
r I ~ I ~ ' , ~ ' ~ ~ ° t• i~~ : - r~ . ~ ~
r t r t ~S! t ~ n • ~ r'
- 1 ~ ' . ~ ~ ! • ' i ; i
_ 3- iru
Z
~ ! ~ ' ' ;i~ti•. ~ .a ~ M~-~--t~Wi s~ ~C~
t ~ . ~ ;•:.;f,... ~ ~
-00
f" ~--i~-~ ' • ~ ,';:'is: , s i~ i ' .r
y • ~ :.f ~ ; . ~+--~ff~i +I ~ ~
~~z ( ~ i ~ : J;; ~ • ~ i ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ !.'r.9'~ - • ~ '
j ; 1 ~ 1.• F N~-{{}~1'-~' , ~
( ~ ' ` ~ ~ : ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ x ,
~ i ~ _ • ~ : ~ i ~ ' . . ~r j •
1 ~ ~ ~ ~i:" ~f ~ 1~ ~
Li
~ ~ i ~ ~ ► ~
; ~ I~ ~ ~ f i ~ ! ~'~4~
~ \ : •
• i . : ; : w ' ~w~.. ~ 1
t
= i i i ; f • E~"' . ~~'~'1 (i Q
Yw►tJlS[IY Ii0A0 ~ •t : 1 l~'' , y~•_'_•• ~ . ~ ♦ • ~ J
I + S •t ~ ~ • f ' ' ' 1
( • , ~ ,1
: ~ ' 4~ ? ~ . •
~ ~ ~ R~ - ~ ,.•S ' I i ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ ' /Ki~l~ ~Ip _
~ ~ ~ • . • j ~ t . ' t' ~ . • -...,n. . . f.. .
~ .,~t~.l• s . ~
$ : ~ i;;•.~ • t~ ~
~ y
ix f
~ ~ . . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ' ' ~ ' . ~F .
. . .
~ V' ~x~ ; ' ► , . ~ ~►wow ,a~c
. . . . ~ , . . , ~ ~ •=3~ ~ ~ [ l ' ~ • .
' • - I ~ ~ ~ . 1
's ; _ ~ . ; i •
• . ~ , ~ . . ' ~ • ~
"rc_~ ~ _ ti . ~
fZ. r e Q~~..~ ' i • • $
t • • • ~ ~ . I ~ ~ _ '
~ Rt il ~ t ~ , J r ~ ~ . .
x ~f . • ,a . ~ : a~• s r• ~ , ~
Z . j • , . ~ ~ ' ' ~ , ~ .
a L ~ ; • 1 . i~l ~i~ f w ~ f , i~ y • ~ 8
o I ~ . ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , r' , ~ ~ .
~ _ _ : J . • f -•sr ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ .4 . . . , .
? : • • ~ ~ ~ a~ t ~ ' ' . . ~
et
.
~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ • `~y.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a:. S
~ . 1 ~ 1
. ~ ~ ~ 1 • r.`~ •
; Y ~ ~ ~ ~ 1Mr06iW AWI~ ~!"'■'1 • .
'o . . ~ ';v: . ~ - : ~ ~
~ • ~ _ • • .t ~ ~
* ~ p OW116 0 4ii . ~ ~
ti : : . . ; . . . . . . ~Q~ • ' • r 1 • sr `T ' . , ~~/I
~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i~■ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,Ri
1/ • ~ ~ ~ : f ' i ~R ~a ~
~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~e
y
x Y R~a • • R . ~ .
n ~ j~ • ~ - z i ~ . • . ` . ~ ~ ~ ~
z ~ i ~ ~ L • ~ ~ ~ ~
~ E ` > ~ a ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g$~~~ t -c . ~ , .
• ~ - ~ • • • ~ • ~ • ~ w. ~ •.~M•♦ ~
t I ~ , ,.`.'i~ ~ . ~ ' ~ . . ~ . L • ~
~ _ . _ _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . . . . . ~ . . ; ; ; ~ . . . . . , .
~ . , ; . , . , ` ~ ; ~~ar, r'~T• : • •'~~:.i'
~ • ~ • i. .;~..1R"..~,' .
•tw.i~ Y~. ~ - ;w~. . 1..~~.. i~K~' ~''{`C~..~.~ :I'ww w.a.•!.(vtR~~ ~K~•~9I~: ~ .i~~~'~~~, •~~'•~~`'bt:~.. ~Y:. K•• , y'4.Tr_ .
~ • ' :~7!~► i' ~ ~~""y► : ~1x' .~1.tF • ~f~ ~ +r~j' ' - ~ • ' .H ~ ~ ~ ,-a~•l~•~r'J ~ . • L ~ ' • + ` • ~ ~ •
. • ~ y ► ~1~~yA~_ i
T, ' ~1 ► • ~ ~j:: : i~'~!'~ 1 iT' , y~ . i....~.~.•y;?-~ '~'r.. . . • , s» ~ Y ~ ''i7 ° .:•.;•N
~
~ I' 1 ~4A~'~ • ~ ~ i
-r •..n..~.~~yM►M:..r-~...:.....r.-~vt.~..:v .r:~. .,r•:..•....i.++r._. ..a~~..•a•wr.~an~.~..•~w~•.a.........wa•~ rti.++.~~.•n..w~w~r: ..ww..r.wrirn~w~arw~►•~•..~r~•.tr~..w.....,
, ..e •
~
~
2. The issuance of a building pennit by the Department of Building and Safety is
required. 3. Requirements of F'um I?istrict No. 1 need to be satisfied during the building permit
process.
4. Dernolition permits are required.
WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site
with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigaaon uses although arrangements
have not been made.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORTTY
1. Dust emissions must be conmolled during demwlition, construction and excavation.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition af d.irt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All traveled surfaces must be paved and kept clean.
4. Article V of SC:APCA Regulation I reqnires a Notive of Constcuction and
Application of Appmval for all air poltution emission sources. This includes such
sources as heating nnits greayer than 400,000 Btu/hr.
5. Demolition projects must comply with the requirements of GFR 40 Part 61, Subpart
M. InLent to Demolish and Renovate forms are available at the SCAPGA office.
8-89 HEC Staff Report for ZE-18-89 Page A-16
~
I
~ 1
:i = - NG pEpA~~MEN1
~F.~}~''~k^~'~... "v s,'
~ ":;~~:';~''i:':'~ H, TAE£
p LA~. T
asoN 5
'-:;_::~~;i>> 721 }EFFE
tsi~' i?::~'. x : •
• ` ut~01N
C£N?RE 8
' s,~:% ~ ~;s• 8ROA0`N
PNONE 456-2205
99260
SPOKANE, WaS~~NGTON
1
r.N
Y
1~;~~ •
~'riw . ' ~•q?;`;.; OuNTY `OURT NouSC
. ,
..••SPOKANE
~
MEM4RAND~M
~ a ane Health District gi gafety .
kane countY art~ent of Butldin~
Spo ~o~ty DeP
lanfl~ng ~'d~in'strator
Spokane Cutient p
Uorobiowsk-',
> 0,~ rsteVe -
~ 1989
Auf
Ust
City PT°ject. on ~e .
univeYSity Clty, , which is
gU$JECT~ #6* University ~e any additional
ne~► site Fl i tee ag item enda ~d Sen
review ~e Con°
~ pleau t ~earing Ex ~~yr have• SUbu~
Aug at y°u lti le Family an
. co~,m,ents th omme~ial and I`~u P .
e f'rom C
ZE-18-89 ZOneoII~al gusiness ($"3)
6., .~g) to Regl ~ af Conditions
50A=11 ~baa~g • ct Plann~r ' Steve
~ _39-89 ~a~~~e (prol .
~ 25-44~ elopmenx Co• e
$eC' 20 Winvest D~v
~ Spansoi~~Ski~
I~,orob
ip .
L A W Y E R S
A PROF£SSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION
T. Matthew Andersen Fred C. Pflanz
Beverly L. Anderson Lynden O. Rasmussen
Maris Beltins Richard W. Relyea
Robert P, Beschel Stacia E. Reynoids
#John C. Black Slanley R. Schultz
James P. Connelly Patrick A. Sullivan
Michael J. Cronin WASHINGTON OFFlCE tDAHO OFFICE Lawrence H. vance, Jr.
Oennis A. Dellwo 1900 SEAFIRST FIHANCIAL CENTER 1924 NORTHWEST BOULEVARD Lucinda S. Whaley
Pemela J. DeRusha Robert H. Whaley
Leo J. Oriscoll SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201-0695 COEUR d'ALENE, IDAHO 83814 . Meriwether D. Williams
F. J. Dullanty, Jr. (509) 838-8131 (208) 667-2103 'Patricia C. Williams ~
Robeh A. Dunn
Stephen L. Farnell Facsimile (509) 938-1416 Facsimite (208) 664-4816 of counsel Herriet J. Flo James A. Fish
Joseph J. Rekofke
tRichard P. Guy
Tlm M. Higgins Patrick H. Winston
Carl E. Hueber Leo N. Cashatt (1977)
Joel C. McCormick, III .
Stenley D. Moore A!I MemDers Admirted in wesnirigion
Michael F. Nienstedt Tnem;ned tn ieanu a wASrunot«, 1►
Admmea in IiawaU 6 wasninQton
oAdmkted in Alaska. kdaAO 6 Washington
August 14, 1989
Mr. Steve P. Horobiowski .
Current Planning Administrator
N. 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Steve:
I received your letter and the revised site plan for University
City at the same time. As you requested in your letter, attached
are 7 copies of an alternate site plan. As you can see the
. changes are related to interior building locations and is "
not.intended to*affect or impact any of the previously identified
off site impacts.
The issue with regard to the parking variance still remains
in the alternate plan and, as you know results from the apparent
requirement that parking-be provided for common mall areas
if those areas are covered.
The alternate site plan has slightly less square footage than
I
the initial site plan. We wi11 be presenting this alternate site plan to the hearing examiner committee at the hearing
in addition to the initial site plan. We will also be presenting
architects illustrations of the site plans. Our plan is to
obtain those illustrations prior to the hearing so that I
can discuss them with you.
Please advise if you have any questions.
vT y truly yours,
.
N Y R.'
SCHULTZ ECEIVED R SRS/jlw
Enclosure AUG 14 rvwS
SPOKANE COUNTY
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
x~
. ~
~
~
~
z~
1ox
F
~
Q 0
<
0
~ p 0
~ z
_ . ~
~
s►uave AvaNUe
~
LI
• ~ ~ ~ ,
~ MAu NAIOt I M
l.on r.L►~ w►L~ g w
, o ~L ~u,oR J o Q ~ `
° ~ I ~ , a
~
L)
MA~~ ► ~
MNaR a I ~
: exisriNO
y J ` ~ FtBD&RICR O 1000 ~
EiaTtma
C ~ NBLSON couSt l.Cx1LNNBY
'UDG ~ v I ( I tpIWA
~ a-~•~
ad I I c~ ~}a,■~, I a,~~
~
^ _ f ay n. ~w
wnn rn . w~a+~ ww
~SA IYYIa ~ ~r M~~Y ~.I. Y.IM 1.1.
NI~ 7.t. 1~1 M.IY 1.1. M.1M 1.1.
iBCONO AYBNUE pONT 01 MA1'
~ 1 p.M I.IM~M II.
I~W 1.1. ~y,W 1.1. >
RI~ W ftlC~ Mf~1~ ~.IYt.M ~.I. ~
r MrW 1.1. II.~M 1.1.
IWM UY 4M.NI ~.7. aM.W S.F.
.
u~
1
$S
v~
q~4
t
Ow I: •
YII 1/Wr
W I NV E ST R UNIVERSITY CITY ~SHOPPING CENTER Spokane,, Washin8ton
~ sr•i
~
Y
141TA
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 [1-
ZEC3 .
*L -
~
. A,87
r~
. .
SPOxANE E1fnR0MEfTJl! OitDI[fANtf Zf- /8- 97
(WlC 191-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1) ~
0
'_3g•$9 Envlrormental Checkitst
►u►9oso ot 0e611st: File No.
The State Envlrorwental Policy Act (SEPA) cAapter 43.21C RC11. requlres ail goverfoental agenclas to Constaer the envtronmental fmpacts ot a proposal
before inklng Aecistons. M Envtronwntal Impact Statement (EI5) wust be pre9ared tar all proposals rith probabte signiticant aGverse iwpacts on
tAe pwllty ot ths em►lrotinent. the purpose of this checkllst is to provide lnfaraa N on to I+elp you and tAe agenty ldentity ispacts tram your
proposal (snd to reduce ar avotd 1aQacts from the proposal, if tt can be done) and to help the agency detide rhether an EIS 1s reQutred.
Instructtons tor Appltcants: -
TNis envfroewentat Mecklist asks you to destribe soae bas1c lnto►eaatlon aba t your proposal. Governoental agencles use thls chedcllst to detenmlne
rl+ether the envlrona++ta1 lapacts ot your proposal are slgnlficant. requtring preparat4on of an EIS. Answrr the questtons brfetty, wlth the inest
precise Infotiatioe knarn. or gtve the Dest destriptton you can.
rou aest answer eatA autstian accurately snd caretullr. to tRe best of your knarledge. In wost cases. yau should be eble to ansver the questions
f►4m your own o0servattons ar p►o,ject plans Mlthaut the need to A1►e experts. If you really do not know the arnver, or 1f s question das not epply
to your proposal. write •do not knar• or •does not spply.' Caaplete ansvers to the Questions nar wy avold unnecessary delays latrr.
Some Questions ask asout govefnwental rtqulatlorts, such as zontng, shorettne,, and landieark designations. Arawer tM:e questions it yeu can. It you
Aave OroDlews. the governwntal agencies can assist you.
TAe Mectllst questfons apply to all parts of yovr proposal, even 1t you plan to Qo tAeu over a period of tlme or on dltferent parcels ot lend.
AttacA anr addittonal fnformt/on that vitl descrlDe your proposal or 1ts env/ronnental etfects. The aqency to vhicfi you subaoft this checkllit mey
ast you to expiain your answers or provide additlonal lnfonvtion reasonably relatied to detervining it there mey be slqnif/cant aQverse lmpact.
Use ot cAeckllst tor nonproject preposals:
Cowplete tA1s Medctist for nonproject praposals. eren thougA questtoes auy De ansrered 'does not aoply•.
IN AOOITION. caqlete the SUPflQ1EMTAl SFEET POR It0!tPROJECT ACTIONS(PaK 0).
For eorproject actlors, the nterences 1n tAe ;heckllst to tRe wrds 'project.' 'applttant.' and 'property or site' should ae read as 'proposal.'
'proposer.' and •affecttd qeo9raphic area.' respectively.
A. -EACKC1tOUND
1• '+me ot orooo:ee orojcct, tt appiiuele: T1n i vPrSitv (_i tv Shopp i nc. Center Improvements '
z. %a.e or App»canc: 1nlinvest Develol2ment Corp. C`/O Stanl PU R_ Schultz/Wi ns on-, _aghatt
3. Aeeress ane phone nuaber ot appticant or contact person: 1900 Seafirst Bldg, Spokane Washington
99201 (509) 838-6131
4. Date chetkllst prepared:__Za v 5, 1989
s. Aqenty requesting CAetkllst: Spokane CountY Planning Department
6. P."o:ee c,o,ng or :ctieaule (includlnq pAasing, ,f ,pprfcable): Construction to beqin immediately
followinq zone chanqe approval - June 15 (estimated), Construction
camplat~ - AuQ,G ] q91 (estimatPd) r
7- Oo you Aave anr Plans tor tuture addltlons. expansioa, or further actlvity related to or connetted with this o*oposal? if yes, exptain.
no
b. Qo you own or have opttons on land near0y or aEjaceM to this proposal? If yes. explain.
no
8. List anr environwntal lnfor+eatlon you know nbout that Au Deen prepered, or rill be prepared, aiKnty relatM Lo this proposal.
A_ ir cLua,l i ty renort and Traffic ~Ualvsis will royide_dA as an
addendum to this checklist. '
(4w .
aev.2/iisa ~
- SlOC6LiL T11VLROMCNfAL O1tDIlIAItCL
~ (`1AC 197-11-960) Secclon 11.10.230(1)
A. EACXC'tOQdD (eoatiaued)
9. Do you Imw vlwtAer applicatioas ar+ peadiag for go.ereamratal appcovsl• of otlrr propoaals direecly afiocciua tAe property co.ered Eq your
pcoposal? If yes. sxplain. '
no .
10. List aay governmet spprova L or pecnit• ttut vill Ee nee"d [or yous proposal. if 1moref. Z o n e c h a ng e ap p r ov a 1,
apnroval of strPPt' water, sewer aod s.
Buildinc_permits. Site lan Approvals. c ~
6
~ ~ i
11. Give • Drief, eamplete 44tocription'of rwr proposal. laeluding tfu praposed uses and tM sisa of the pro}act and •ite. :Tu re are several
questiooi Lter in thle c Mcklist that uk rou to desecibe csctaia u pacts of rour.proposal. Yau do aot naed to repeat those anavera on th!•
pase.
Zone chanQe to permit expansion of Universitv Citv Shoppinq Center to the
sou h. Thp- ex~ansion will r)rovide aAproximatelv 450.000sf of additional'.
retail shoppinq and will consist of construction of parkina structurelto
increase the number of parkinq spaces to approximately 4530. Tr.e site is
. approximately 37.2 acres. ~ ,u 9 , / 00 zs-e~
~
i
1:. [ocatioo o[ t1+e pco 6~6J
. Civ~ sutiicleat lotoeaation Eor a person to understaad the preeise loution of rouc proposed projeet. including a
•cceet addcess. it aay. aad sectioo. toves~hip and ravgs. if kaovn. It • propo"l vould oeeur ovac • range•of area. provtde the range or
bouadarie• o( the •its(e). frovide • legal dasctlptioa. •ice plaa. vicinicp siap. •nd topoaraphlc osp, if reasonaAlr •vai L ble. while you
should submit any p Lna reQuircd br cM aaency, you ere oot feQuiced to Eupliu ts aaps or detailed plana sutsitted vich any pe nit application
related to this checklist.
5puth of Soracsue Ave. w'est of Universitv Rd. North of the realigned Second
Ave., and East of Walnut Rd., NE 1/4 of Section 20 Township 25 Range 44,
Snnka nP C'nnnt Z [Ja czh i nrrtnn _
U• Doe• che ptoposed attlon lle vithin [he AQu![er Seetsltire Aru (ASA)' :'M Ceneral Saver Secvice Area' :he PTloticy Sever Secvice Area? he
Clcy of Spokaae' (See: Spokane Councy's ASA Ow r Ly ione Atlas for boundaries).
ASA, GSSA, PSSA.
-o aE coePLe-zn eT nreLtcAxr
6. HfVI&OICQIPJL LZ.QQ.Y[S
Evaluation Fot
1. EAR:7t Agency Uee Only
a. Ceaersl deacripcion of' cM eite (eirele oae): t L c. eollicsg. hiliy. steep slopes. aouatalaous.
other: •
Flat
b. 'fiac ls the •tcepest slope on the aits (approsiaate pereene slope)? 12%- Re 1 e t i v e 1 v
level except at Sja and NE corners.
c. ':hat generai type• of sotli era (ound oo the •ite (for euaple, clay. saod, gtavel, paat, muct)1
If you kaov [ht classiflcation of aaricultutal so! L. speclty them and note any pTime farvland.
.._GQA-Garrison crravellv loam 0-5%
d. Are chere eurface ladlcacions or histotp of unstable solls in the iomedieta vlciai:y' It 10.
de sc ri be .
No
2
~
' .
• '(WAC 197-11-960) S*cttco 11.10.230f11 SPOIUIIE ENYIRO!lF7RAl 0R9I!(At1EE
8. ENYIRONIOITIIt 0.QE.N'fS(tontieued)
Evatuatlon For
-
e. Cescrlpe tAe pnrpost. tYpe, and apfQqxi te qwntltias of any,titltng cr qrading proposed. Agency Use Only
Indlpte source ot t111. Np i 1~1 , s ant-; c, = ated,. Earthwork will reqruire minor ctradina for new struc-
turp-s, dra i nage and veh i cu 7 a r i rc-u1 a t i nn I,_
f. Could eroslon oaur as a result of clesring. constructlon. or use3 It so, generally deuribe.
No
y. ADout whst penent of the site wftt pe covered M1tA lapervlous surfaces atter profect construc-
. tlon (tor exaxple, asphalt cr butldtngs)? .
• 90% includinQ Darkinq areasr walkinq and roofs.
Approximately 30% of the roof lines and 60% of the
rzarkinQ areas currentl v eNist.
h. Proposed wasu►es to reduce or centrol eroston. or other 1mpacts to the earth. if any:
N? _n_? _m._? zation of cut and fill t landscapinQ, pave-
i23 and curbing will control erosion. Dry dirt
during cons ruction will be snraved with water to
additionally reduce erosion potential
2. aia
A. Hhat type ot enisslorts to tfse a1r woulA result frcm the proposal (i.e.. dust, autaeobfle. odors
industrtal. wood saoke) durteg tonstructlon and wAen the proJect is caq leted? If any.
generally describe and glve spproximate quantltes tf known.
Tvpical vehicular emissions, minor dust durinq
construction. rL.
'b. Are there anr oft-site sources of eelssions or odor tAat an aftect ~
y 47proposal? if so.
- ' generelly destribe.
110
c. Propostd measures to reduce or cont►ol emisslons or other tnpatts to atr. 1t any:
Provide circulation improvements to site and adjacent
roads per County request, hosing dry dirt during
construction
3. MATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface rater sody on or in the fmoedtate vicinity of t"e !f:P +-c'uding year-
round and seasonal streaAS. saltwter. lakes. ponds Metlands)? It yas. describe type anE
provlde names. If approprtate~ stat ~hat strens river tt flo s 1 to.
no ZZAE- -J
(2) Will the project requlre an- work over, in. or adjacent to (Mithin 200 feet) the descrlDeE
waters? If yes. please describe and attach eva11a01e pians.
no
3
sPaius. ENvsRoWUxM 07auus+d
' (vAC 197-11-960) S+etion 11.10.230(1)
a. Qf9TRONlRttLAL QlMal1':^S (contiou&d)
lvalwtion Fot
mencq Usa Oaly
(l) [stioacs cM asauat ot fill aad dndge aatstial ttsaC vould be pLcad !a or remotied Eraa t!w
sur(ace wter or wtLad• aad indieat• the arsa oi the site tAat rould be sifeeted. Iodieat* •
the souree of t111 rterlal. .
N/A
(4) Yill cM proposal reauire wsface .ntor victdowls or diwniona! Ciw a Zeneral dascrip-
tion. yusposs. and a99roxlaat• Qnantitiis. if knwo.
no
(S) Ooes the proposal lie vithla a 100-yeas tlood pLin? It so, nota locacLoe on the site plsr.
no
(9) Does the proposal larolve tur diechacze• of wate ostecials to sutLace vat*rsT If so.
describe the cyye of wsce aed aatlclpateE volur of dischar;e.
no
b. Ground:
(1) Yill groundvater be vitl+drawn. ot vill vatec be dischsraed to groundvater' G1ve geoecal
deecctption, putyose, and approaisatt auantitlme. it tasove.
no tl~
(2) Deseribe wote oatetial that vill De discharged lato the 6rouod iran sepcie tanks oc othet
saaitaty vast• treawnt fae111ty. Desccibe the Sanusl sist oi the systm. the nusber ot
houses co Ee marved (1E applieable) or the aumber of pecoons c!w qsten(s) are expecced to
serve.
All sanitary wastes will be discharqed into the
Spokane County sewer system.
(3) Deseti0e any systeas, ocher tAan thos• designd for the Aiopo ul ot saaitst7l vaste.
inscalled for the purpose of discdarging tlulds Eelov the gcouod surtaea (include• systeas sucfi
a• chose tor the diiposal ot store ratet or dralaaa* ftm tloor draleu). OeseriDe the type ot
sysces, the aaount of oaterial to be disposed of cAsougA t M eyetes and the tqpes of wateriale
llkely co be dioposed of (ineludina sace Hal• vAieh aaT eatec the syste inAdvaccaacly chrough
sptlls or as a result oi firefigfitinS activities).
Surface runoff will be discharcted into the qround-
water via grass percolation areas and drywells,
per Spokane County Standards.
(L) Yill anr etmical• (espeelally orgoale solvents or petroleua fuels) be •tored !n above-
ground or underground scocaaa tanksT ti so, vhat qpes and Quaatitie• of aateciaL vill De
scored'
Wp, do not anticipate anv underaround or above ground chemical storage.
4
• siogAxt cMnaotadxrat. oRnzassM
. (YAC 197-11-960) SOetioa 11.20.210(1)
S. CMROffiMAL L1EKEN' .5 (coatimud)
evalwclon ror
e Only
Aasney U6
(S) Vhat protecctve aearnres vill be ukea co iwure tAac leab or apilL of t~ ehedeaL -
•tored or wed on site vill not De alloved [o percoLco to grauedvatet (thU itrlu~s masures
to kaep cheaicals wt of diepocal qsteme dsscribad !a 3p(2) and lb(1)T '
No chemicals are exT)ected .to be stored on site.
Any inadvertant interior spillage will be drained
hy f 1 onr drai ns t-o sPwer _ Mn hazardflLs was _ will
be stored. .
C. Vster Runoft (ineludlns •toro vatsr): (1) DameriDe che source of nmoff (laeludiag stoes vater) and M t:wd of colleetion and dispow 1
if any (include Quantltlea. if lmorn)• Whers vill thls Mtet tlov! Y111 this waiet tlov lato
other vatersi If so. dsscriba.
Storm drainage will be carried above and below .3
ground to detention pond. See expanded report
(attached)
(2) Jl11 aey cMsicals pe atored. handled or wed oo tl+t •ite in • loestion vAere a apill of
leak vill dtala to surfact or ;TOUndvater ar to a•torm vater dispo wl hrstm discharaias to
surface or groundwtec?
tlo
(1) Could vast• matarial• eater arwnd or surlaeo watesst If so. aenerally da scriDe.
No ,
d. ProposeA measurcs to reduca or toatrol suctaee, graaad. and cvnoif vater lapscts. tf anr (it
t tM proposad action 11e• vitltin [!u Aqulfee Senaitivs Area be especially elear oe esalaeutioeu
r relatins to faci]lties toneseniesg Seetioas 3D(4). )S(S). aod 3c(2) of thia ehseklist):
Maximum site slope is not expected to exceed 4%
6. PI,A,VTS -
a. rf►eck or eircle crpe ot vesetatioa found oe tM •ite:
X X declduaus cree: aldac. aaple. aspen. otficr.
XX evergreen tree: tir. cedac otl+er.
_X2L ~hr+ba. Ornamental
X X gtn~s. N a t iv e
pasture.
crop or grain.
vet soil plants, esccsil. buttercup. bulltwh. dkuak eabbaae, other.
ater plancs: uscer lilly. eelarsns. oilfoil. otAer.
_XX_ other cyp.s ot v.R.c,cioa• Ornamental landscaping
b. Whac kind and asouat of vagecation viil be resowd or altared'
Native grass, and most introduced v.egetation
c. Liac thceateeed or endangessE specie• kaova co be o0 or near che sice.
None known d. Proposed landseaping, we of aAt! w pLoF@. oc oth6c zt uce t,p pteservs ot •nha e ve etatlon
on the •ite, !f aey: T,andGea,~nc, inc'~uaincqrounc` eiver i
shrubs, trees at perimeter of site and in parking lot.
5
• SrQAE ENYIRO1!lEllTllL ORDINJIIKE
•(IUC 197-11•960) Sectton 11.10.230(1)
S. EMYIAQNIENTIII ELE?IENT'S (tontiaued)
Evalwtfon Fcr
Aqency Use Only
5. 11111MALS
a. Clrcle any birds and anlmais wh1tA have Deen obstnrM on or near the site or are kncMn to be on •
or near tAe site:
D1rds: hawk. heron, eagle. sonqbirds, other: S ng b i r d s
mammals: deer. bear. elk, beaver, othet:
tish: bess. salnan, trout. herring. shelltish. other:
other:
0. L1st any threatened or endangered spectes known to be on or near the sSte. Non known
c. Is the slte part af a migratlon raute? If so. e,cplaln.
d. Proposed aeasures to preserve or enl+ance wildltte, if any:
LandscapinQ will attract sonqbirds
6. ENfRGY AtID nATURAt RESOURCES
s. Mhat kinds ot enefqy (electric, natural gas, rood store, solar) M111 be useE to aieet t1+e
the caqleted pro)ect's energy needsT Oescrlee whether it wiil be uscd tor heatlnq. wanutac-
turing, ett.
Gas and electricitv. Its primarv use will be 'Lor
heat and lighting. No fossil fuel uses are expected.
b. YaulA Your pro3ed affect the potentlal use of solar eneryy by adjacent propertles? It so.
generally describe.
N~
c. What kinds ot encrgy constrvatlon features sre 1nc1u0ed 1n the plans of this proposal? L1st
other proposed measures to reduce or control enerqy tapacts. if eny: ,
Sky lights are anticip~ated. The development ~ill
conform to all Northwest enerqv code requirements.
7. ENVIil01MENTAI, HEALIH
a. Are there any envlromsenta) hralth hazards. lntluEing exposure to tOxit chemicals. rtik of flre
and explosion, spill, or hazarCous weste, that could oaur as a result of Lhis proposal? If so.
descriDe.
• 1~
No - ~
lobsoun
~
(l) Descrihe zpecial emergency serrtces chat might be required.
Fire hvdrants will be installed, perametics, fire
and police services can be expected.
6
STOIIIIML ID1V210lQUHiU OSDI11AttCt
(uAG 197-11-96a) Seesion 11.10.230(1)
D. L?IVIAONlM11YA1. E3JXER8 (eaatiauad)
. Eri1tL [lOp TOY
A`sntr Dse Onil y
ttIV2A0?1lQif:AL IEAL:B (eontinued)
(2) Propwed musure• to reduee or control •=.aroeiaatal health ha:ards. it any: .
D1 Y'PC`t WP?"1 b. Hoise: •
(1) vhac t7►pes ot aoiee esist !o the asea vhich my affect ywr psojeet (for axauyle: traEtic.
•quipmnt, operatioo. other'
P
LW
~
J
(2) Vhat types and lavels oi oolu vould De craated by or auoelated vitA the projeet on a
•hort-tero or a loag-ta n Du i• (tot euaple• traLfic. cons[ruction. operation, ptAer)' I~ u[e
..tuc hours nos.e wo~d co.e fcom cna •sce. $hOZ't term I101SeS 1I1C111C1e
typical construction noises from 6ain to 6pm. Long
term noises include traffice to and f rom the site
during regular working hours and evenings.
Proposed seasure to rsduee or eaatiol eoise lopaccs. if sny:
Provide circulation improvements (at this time .
undetermined), limited construction hours, land-
scaping.
s. uM Arro seoRet.irrE usE
a. Yhat is the current use ot the site and aQjacent properties' S h o p p i n q'C e n t e r,
Various commercial uses, and soon an STA structure.
D. 14• the site been wed for agticulture'. If •o, desetibe. Y p y. P r i o r to 1 9 5 3
much of the site was an orchard.
c. DescriDe aRy struetures on t!u •ite. Th e e x i s t i n ct U n i v e r s i ty C 1 tjl Ma 1 1
and U-City West Bldg. as shown on the attached site plan.
d. Vill any structures be desolislud? If w. vf+leh? Ye S. S e e at t a c h ed
demolition sketch, included with expanded drain-
age report.
e. vhat 1s the euneat soniets elaseifieation of cAc •ite7 C- C omm e r e i a 1, B 3- Commu n i t y
Business MFS-Multiple Family Suburban
tlhac !o the eurreat cmpreheerive p Ln designscion oi t •itei
Commercial did
~
g. If applicable, vhat ls che eunent •Aortliae aaster prosrm deslgnatlon ot the •ite7
. I1T~A •
h. Na• any part of the site beao clauified a• an "amitonmeotally seasi[lve' areat Ii so.
•petity.
No
Approziaately Aov saay people vould reside or vork lo tAe completed project7 A I7 I7 Y'n X 1-
matelv 1400 emplovees.
7
3!'0[iXII. WITUMMOMM OEDIt41tCE
• '(WJ1t 197-11-460) 3ection 11.10.230(1)
E. QiVA0MMfiU RXMZNi'S (eoatinned)
Lra2uacLon !or
Agtoty UN Ooly
J. Approxirtely Aov saay peoplt voald the co.put.a agoj.ct aI.o1sc.?Api:)roximatelv 40. ,
k• hopos&d wsure• to avoid or reduea QispLement Lipaece. !i au.: Existinq tenants
will remain with the ex_Pption of RnsaLer-g' emal-oyees
who will be relocated to the new store to the east.
1. Proposed saasun• to ensure the proposal 1s tompactble vitA ezistias aad projeeced Lnd was and
plans, if any:
The_plans are compatabl P T„li th the nnmrrPhPngi vA
plan. The zone chanqe will insure compatability
with the commercial zoninq.
9. HODSINC
a. Appro:laately hor oany unit• vould De provided, ii iwpT lodicate vlrcM r hish-. •iddlr , or
lorincom housina.
None
b. Approxioatalr !wv asar uotts. ii aar. vould De elidtite0t Iodiu te vfwt M r hiQh-, aiddls-. or
lov-ineome houslog.
None
c. Proposed s"su n* to cedut• or control housin,g lapects. it aay:
None
10. AESTIIETICS
a. What is the talleat height of aer proponed sc n+ccure(@), aot, } lyding aat4naa8! ~ is the
pHneipal •:terior Duildina ~aterial(s) D~Pas~? NO bL i1~ lI1(3 ~ 7 nC 1 UQ 1_'1_g
. the theatre, will exceed 60' in height. The prin-
cipal exterior building materials will likely`include
concrPtP-, stLr_ko., and/or masonryr
b. 'rhat vievs in the lasediate vlclnitr vould Se alteeed or o0sttueted!
None
C. Proposed ~asure• co ceduee or eontrol wst Mtie lapsecs. lt aay:
Sof teninq of architectural lines with landscaping.
11. LIGHT tivo ctAxt
a. 'fiac type of 11ght or g L re vill the proposal prodnuT 'lhat [ims of dar vould it mainlq oecur?
P_arki ng lot liexhting,1 exterior si_qnage, tlieatre
lightinq-Eveninqs until approximately 11:00pm_
D. Could 1Sght or S Lr~,f the tiaishtd project a satsty lusard or lqcectere v204 vis wt ~
. ~ - -
~
e. what e:istiaa ot[-sica saurees ot 116ht or aiart a&y affect ywc proposall •
d. Proposed neisurss to reduce or tonttol light ar.d aLre impacce, lt anr: A 1 1 pa r k i ng
lot licthtinq will be shielded and directed toward
ctx-o-un.d _ F.xtPr i or be low amperaQp. 8
-
• SlOxARL IIRTZRGlildti'fAL ORDIlfANd
'.(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
' I. OfVIROtQMUfAL nJDM1Qi5 (eontiamd)
[raluatiae /or
12. RLCltLATION Assacy tloe Only
a. Yhac dooiVaced aad in[otmal rectational oppoTtuaities are 1a CM loswlete viciaity? '
Balfour Park b. Yould the proposed pcojeet diap Lee anr e:isting recru tlonal uses! Lf so. descs1Da.
No c. Proposed aaasure• co reduee or eartcol iapact• on recru tioe, ineludint nenatioaal opportuni-
ties to Da provtded by the projecc os •pplicant. it any:
N/A
13. NISTORIC AND CITL?URAL PRLSCRVATIOti
a. An ihere aap places or objeeta listed ori or proposad tor national, scata or local ptesatva-
tion regiatere knovn to De on or nest to the •ite? If so. 6enecally desetibs.
No
D. Cenerally describo aer lacdoacka or evidance o[ historie arehaeologieal. se L ntiflc oc cultural
laportance imovn to De on or ne:t to cAs site.
None •
c. Proposed neasuce• to reduce or control iapaets, if any:
None
. 16, :1',AI75POR:'A2IOfi
a. Identify public streets aad AigMay serving the •ite and de scribe proposed occess co the
e:isting street srstem. Shoron site pLns, if eny. S_1>_X'dC{11e Ave. 1S aprineipal
a.rterial to the north, University Rd. is a collector
arterial to the eastr Walnut Rd. to the west. 2nd
Ave. is proposed to become an express way or one-way
c~n 1 _ _ w ' h S,~ague . b
C. Is aite cucrently eeeved b7r public craaslt' If not. vlsat 1• the appco:faate diatance to the '
neares[ [ranait stopi 1%7 P,S
c. Hov oanr parking space• vould the coapleted projeet AawT Nov oany vould the project eliainate'
AnnrnximatE?lv 4530 in a combination of three parking
structures and surface parkinq lot
d. Vill the proposal reQuire any nev road@ or •creets. or improvemec• to esiscina road• or •treete
noc including drivavays? .c so. ganerally d crib fi lcace c pvblic or privaCe).
See traffic stud
e. 4111 che project usa (or oceur in the lmmediace vlcinity of) water, rail. or air traaspattacion'
If w, gerterally dexribe.
NO
9
• ~ SPOEANL L1fV=10KAENTAI. ORDIllI18Ct
(VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1)
1. Q7VIROIRQlP.Al. LLDQJfTS (continued) .
Lvaluation For
11gapey Use Only
f Rov man' veAleular trips per day vould pe gaaarated br the coepleted projectt II knovn,
lndicate vhen peak vould oeeur. ,
Traffic analysis to be included as an addendum
Q• ProDosed oeasure• to reduce ot conttol tTansportation layacts. !f any:
To be coordinated with Spokane County Engineers
is. rvetic seRVices
Would the projeet tesult in an lnessased need for public serrices (for example. f1Te proteetioo.
police protettlon, health care. scAools. other)? Ii so. aenerally describe. '
Fire hydrants will be needed to service the site.
Ap jpcrease in police protection may be needed to .
_patrol the site. -
p. PTOposed weasures to reduee or eontrol direcc loyaets oe puslic serviees. i` eny: ,
Fire hvdrants will be provided, adecluate access
will be provided.
16. (17ILI'IES
a. Cizcle utllitie• currently 1 L ble at the •lte: eleetrlclt ura1 ga~vater ~efu.e
`ervice.~telepnon~,Yanitary eeve •eptie srstea, other.
Al1 ciXcled utilities are available adjacent to
the site.
. D. Deseribe the utilitle• tAat are proposed for the project. the utility ptovidiag the serviee and
the zeneral cotutruetion •ccivicin• oa the site or in the ismediace vicinity vhich atght be '
needed.
Al1 utilities circled above will re~uire connection
to the site. ~
C. SICNA2V1tE
1. the underslgned, avear under the penalcq of perjury that the above response• are oade tcuth[ully and to the best oi mr kaovled6e. i also
underscand tlut. •`►ould cF►ere Da any villful dssepcesentation or villful Lek ot tull diselosure oa vy part, the aReney oar vithdrav any
daceralnation of aonsigniflcante that 1t aighc iasue in rellanee upoa chie checklist.
D.«: 5,/2"9i MQt Alan Winningham, President/Winvest Development Corp.
(Plea~t Prlnt or Type) Proponent:
Aaere..: 3400 ~Cey Tower, 1000 Second Ave. #Seattle, ~aA
L„re) 98104-1053
Phone: Person eospl. Dace: Ma v 5, 1 9 8 9
f~ru:
Phone: (371
POR STAIf OSE OHGT .
Staff omber(@) revieving thetklist:
Based on chls etaft reviev of the environoeatal checklist •nd otQer pertinent infotaacion, the statf:
A. Concludes that chere •re no probable significant adv+eroe lapacts and recaooend# • detecoloation of aow Sgeifieance.
9• Coeeludes thit probable slQnificant adverse snviroumntal lapacts do exist for the current proposal and rewuend• a mitl.aated decer-
•laation of aonaiQaificanee vich eooditlons.
C. Concludes that there are probable •lanifieant adwrse environoental lopaecs aod recmaends a dete ninacion of •laniticance.
TFLIHC PLE - =75.00
10
. ` ,
. . _ . . . .
, SPRAGUE AVENUE
, . , , .
, , , . ~ . , ,
~ . ; ~ P~ DINGS TO BE . BUIL '0 8 E
s~a~war . ~ ~ . MOVED RE
rnuyws
,
' ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' OF EXISTING tJSE Q 37ING
o , p , . C LUMNS r1ND 0 ~ , . JD
~ o P~ : wuoR 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F40TINGS IS ~z .
~ . - . - P~c ANTICIPATED
~ s~tucrur~ - ~ N ~ ,
I i ~ ~ z : . ~ KING GARAGE ~ EXISTI~JG PAR J W RAGE
WIJOR 1 . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . ; ~ v o wm~ THE WI BE REMO E Q . LL , P ; . SFippS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITH TH E
lWl(Nrd S1R~lC1URE ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z 3 . . LOWER DE , , TION OF THE . EXCEP OWER DECK
,~a,so~ . . , ~ . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~rrs ~ ~ AIN THE FLO( ~ 1NHICN WILL REM 7H E FL00 R
. ~ . . . . . . . NTRAL MALI . . H LOWER CE . s~oas . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . OF T E , ~ s~oPs 3AL MALL AR EA.
, ~ ' ......r ~
~ , ~ 4 I K& NELSON S FP.EDER C J'S
P~o ~ ~ WfLL REMAlN.
, - ~ ~ • ~ ' ~..I , . ' ~ . 1
~ ~ ~ N AND FOOTINGS ~ w~oR ~ COLUI~ S 4GS
2ND AVENU ~ ~ E P RE1110US . P"~ , NNEY N IN ~.C. PE WILL REMAI PENNEY
. _ _ ~ , ~ . NEYYBERRY S. AND
WIN WiLLI~ ST SHER . IlY WE U C , IIN WiLLIAMS,
~ ' E EASTER~ SANDTH ROSAUER EASTERNMOST
~ ~ 8E REMO HOPS WILL _ RETAIL S 3E REMOVED
. NEYV STI ED WITH AND REPLAC N EW STRUCTURE~-
~ ~ REALI N ~ G D 2 VENUE E ND A
g
~ , ~ -
8-89 HEC hearing list Page 2
.
4. ZE-8-89 Zone Change from Agricultural Suburban to Regional Business
(B-3)
Sec. 16-25-44
Sponsor: M.L. Neumann and A to Z Rentals (Project Planner - Tom
Mosher)
5. ZE-23-89 Zone Change from Agricultural to Light Industrial-2 (I-2)
Sec. 9-25-44
Sponsor: Joe Postell c% Dwight Hume (Project Planner - John
_ Pederson)
6. ne Change from Commercial and Multiple Family Suburban
( S) to egional Business (B-3)
ZE-50A-87 Change of Conditions
VE-38-89 Variance
Sec. 20-25-44
Sponsor: Winvest Development Co. (Project Planner - Steve
Horobiowski)
7. ZS-41-88 Continued from the June Hearing - no additional comments
required. (Project Planner - John Pederson)
.lP 1
/ V .
~
s ,
SPOK:ANE COUIV'I'Y PLA►NNING DEPARTMENT ,
APPLIC~TIOIyS BEFORE THE ZONINC; ADn 1STnRBnARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Ccrtit'icatc o[ Exemption No.: Application No.:
~
~ Namc of Applicant:l'.i►'u4-4 ~~~-•r~~~.-J'' Agent: Y N
Strcct Address: s! C,~v.
Zip ~ Phoae - Home:
Cicy: P~ r' a Scatc: W-A Code: Work: -7 374 - I Agents No.
, Na:me of Property Owner(s): U r-- *i v aes j_'111 CrL , 1K: L -
Strcet Address:_,")11 do.`N."fiowti 0'r'Fi« 91CIS
Zip ` Phone - Home:
Ci ty : ~uo ~-~►~h-- S ta te: ~b Code: Dt-11 Work:
RCQU-ESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Va r i a n ce (s Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use
Waivcr of Violation Temporary Use/Structure Ot-her:
FOR STAFF USE ONI..Y CODE: ORDINANCE
Cite Regulations Section(s):
Property Violation/
Section: Township: Range: Size: Enforcement: Y N
Exiscing Zone: Comp. Plan Des.: Crossover
LEGAL
PSSA: Y N UTA: Y N ASA: Y N, FIRE DIST.f CHECKED BY:
I-icaring Date: Personnel Taking in Application:
'Existing Usc of Property: e&jG
Describe Intended Proposal in Terans of REQUESTED ACTIONS above:
1 ID~i ldP..RP ~ia~. r A71. r•Q9r.~r~~,,~,1. rS 1► aQ~:~ i~ ~v.lC_.,a,~ ~.~~~s~/1Q•1/o•~
j! v_ y .s.~ ~'+..t 'T ~ ~ . ~ 4- ` (l % QQ Sa ` ~ r_ . i~ A
Clr~ llt•~~`•Z-- C; '14^it-~ 'L`.°',t~.
Strect Address of Property:
Lcgal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable): a
. Parccl No(s):J d3tg_)0310)0`1~~1e of Legala 30Total amount of adjoining land controtlcd by this owner/sponsor: _As-,,,,,-c~r.,,
Wtiat interest do you hold in the propcrty? O'AaZ*~n-
r
Picasc I ist previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
I SWEAR, UNDFR PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AU'I'HORIZED AGENT FOR THE'PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRI?rTEN
PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS
ATf'ACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO T EST OFP OWLEDGE.
, ~
Signed: _n,
A d d ress: /,~4 0`~.~~ ~i,.-•~ ~ n~~ ~ I
Phone No.: Date:
NO'I'ARY SCAL: Notary:
Date:
Page 3 of 4 (Over) Revised 3-4-$8
` ;
A. Rt1It12FN OF PROOF
[t is necessary for the applicant or his/her represcntative to establish the reasons
wtiy the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved. and to literally put forth the basic
case. Accordingly, you shouid have been given a form for your requested gction
(variancc, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way
which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill
the form out and return it witb your application`. If you did not get a form, ask the
Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
B. 2-CLJV-n
l. CO[JNTY HEALTH DIS7CRICT
a) Proposed method of water supp 1•'e~
b j Proposed method of sewage di posal:
A preliminary consultation ha een held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has beea informed of requ~rements and standards.
~
( S i g n-a t u re ) (D ate) (S ign-off W aivcd)
2. C0~1NTY ENCINEERING DEPARTIVIENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has been ' f rcquirements and standards.
(Signature) (~Date) (Sign-off Waived)
3. GOUNTY UTII.ITIES DEPARTME1~T aive if outside WMAB)
A preliminary coasultatio~Proeequirements s been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informcd and standards.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
. The applicant /required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
rc9uircmen and standards.
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with _
~ to becor~e informed of sewage disposal
re ctgirements and st-andards.
4. IYA'I}ER PURVEYORI / (W~ive if outside CWSSA)
a) The proposal is/is noc loc tdd within the boundary of our future
service area.
b) The proposal ' located within the boundary of our current
, districl.
• c) We le to serve this sice wilh adequate water.
d) Satisfactory rrangements have/have ~ been made. to serve this
p-ropo.sal.
(,S i gn a t u pf (Date) . (Sign-off Waived)
.~E'~''YERAGE P[JRVEYORr
S. ~
(It other [han Spokane County)
~
A preliminary -consLil a-tion has been hcld to discuss the proposal.
The appl.icant ha been informed of requiremenes and standards.
(S:ignature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
~ .
Page 4 of 4
_i
. ~
APPLICANT'S FORM
. ~
. NAME :
. , p. t
- - - FILE: A/ IF°
I. VARIANCES . . - ' ,
A. Will the variance authorize a use otherwise prohibited in this zone?
Yes ; No Comment:
/l~- ,t,d4ti•_.Ci ,t;~ - Mni ~~uL12J~"~ , " " -
B. Wi 11 speci al ci rcumstances a 1 i cabl e to the proQerty, (such as si ze;
shape, topography, _ surround _ngs) when combi ned wi th the standards of -,A
the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difficulties for use of the
roPertY and/or dePrive the ProPertY of ri9hts and Pri vi 1 e9es common
P.
to other properti es i n the vici ni ty and simi 1 iar zone cl assi ficati on? ,
Yes" . . ; -No • x ; Comment: ' ~a ~ ~ ~.4
uu' ~
• . ~-~C.V:A~`'~*( .r.. 4~- ~.,t......~ - . ; - .
. ~
• C. Wi 11 the granti ng of the vari ance ,be materi al ly detrimental to the
.
publ i c wel fare . or i njuri ou s to property or improvements i n the ,
~vi ci ni ty and., zone? Yes No Comments : 7J~&
• r., r i ~
' ' •,1 h,, .
iC.( ~T- (1 - . e~.- Q.~~e+.+~t.C~ • ~ f itw-c~.a--. i' ' ' ~ '
. y D. Does strict application of the zoni.ng standard create an unreasonable -.burden in light_ of purpose to, be served by the standard? Yes
No ; Comment:
~,w►^-~- ' a~ ,u.•~- Q ~.o-~~ ~
!
E. Would relaxatian of the zoning standard make a more environmentally .
sensi ti ve or e-, .argy-conserving project or encourage conti nued or netiv ; use of an histr.ric property? Yes _%X; No ; Comment:
F. Will a broader, public need or interest be served by granting verse
denyi ng the vari ance? Yes No ; Comament:
_
' l%- VA410-d -
~ V f .
,
G: Is the case for a variance supported by other like or similar si tuati ons i n the vi ci ni ty a nd i n si mi 1 ar aones? Yes X; No
Cortgnent:
. - ►
(continued on rederse side) ,
. _ i
' - ~ I i
. „a
' , .
A. Wi 11 granti ng the vari ance adversely affect the overal l zoni ng desi gn, pTan or concept for either the inenediate area; or the entire County? Yes ; No ; Comment: .o , . . - .
r
~ .
. , ~ I. Is the case for -a variance substantial1y based upon .t lack of reasonable economic return or a claim that the existi.ng structure, is '
too small? yes ; No Comment:
, , _ . . .
, , , - . , . . - .
r , .
Wi 11 granti ng the vari ance be inconsi stent wi th the gene.ral purpose
and i ntent of the Comprehensive P1 an? Yes ; No ~ i C'omnent:
. .
-
. . _ ,
K. Did the practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance request
' exist before the property was acquired by the present owner? Yes ;
1 .
' . , No Comment : A„~,~;;~,
. ,
~ - °
i ~i • ' , ' _ .
',l. Will the granting of the variance result i,n defacto zone reclassifica-
ti on; that i s, the establ i shi ng of nearly al l the pri vi l-eges comnon to
, a different zone classification? Yes ; No ~x ; Comment:
•
~
M. Does the requested vari a,nce resul t-i n. the ci rcumventi on of densi ty
regulations designed to protect the Aquifer? Yes ; No
. , ' Comnent.:
,
1 1 i j6"
. . , - ' i .
. ' .
• , ` ' ! F, • - •
„ •
1 ,
. . . . .
i• _ . .
l -
-
i
' \ • I
0046z/Arch. 0002z 2 .
, . ,
F~cl YV~'1 ' ,
, ' ' • • • , 'S= ,~y~ ~
r _ _ Af'Y~~,
29 .,la•C.• 11i4~ti,1
r r, . Y` r , ,~uots~ ; R ~ ~ _ ' ~ tY ~ ~~•[►y~lL"` -c-r"', . }~iE i,ikt
~
. : con ~ufl~ ' ; ' ~t ,~tt~~: ~ ' ;1 f• ~
C'= ~.'y ~.yr" :4 ~ - ~ ..r -
_ '~t'. } ~ ~ _ 'lll •a ~ '
tii, . L }~t, ✓ . ~ .~C }
M ,t 9 ya • ( ~tw" ! ~ . 1 ~
9gQp ~ _ ,~~.tn~~~ ► -
29 $5
Va
;
' ~ ' ~ ~ _ --r _ _ .
• j.._ ' ` ~ .
~
~
_ ~ 19
- ~ _
~ ` ✓ r,
~ 'Do1Ce P,~ $ r
poltors
~
,ded Fto~ ~ ~ , ~~•t~
~tev
J ; . ~ add'~eSS , ir
:;cy'al.x: • _ ~ ~ t~ ~•w'
M.'._.s~•"+"' • ti
r•~f~
~►►rt~' ~ ~~~./o
. ~ _
. - • t~~ („1~L~+v
V
~pr Ho~ Pa~~ r~c ~~q'' :
c
<Ou~
pCGput='~ µpNEY
Nt,,S. 4AID p3tpE,R
Cf . .
- gAQUE
t
~
C i
~
. y
~
r ~
. ~ , • ry ~
~ - f . ~o • ~ .
~ . , ~ , I - ~ ~ .
. ~ , ~ r ~ ~
~ . . ~ _ ~ M M
. ' ~ . , . ~ , - , _ ~ r• . , ~ . , - ~ M . ; , ~
~ . . . 1 . . ' ' . ' . i ,.1 , ,
~ . , z . , t . • f~ - ~ . s ~ ~ ' ' . . , , ~ .
Cr . . ~ y~ , ~ . r I!?o ~ t f , w~~~♦ 1 ~ f/1 . ~ ~ ~ , ~ - , 'N„ • ''F 't • ~ r:
r , • • • ~ . ~ ~ :~i. • 1 ~ . •w•~w ' ~ ' , ' ~
r'i; ' V ' i • ~ rA~r , ~ ♦ ~ , y ~ . * / 0I'~A M ~ , ;
. NJ ' ~ . . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ L~
~ ~ , . , . , _ a : ~ ; o
~ . . . ~ . , , ti,. ~ ~ . , l ~
. _ r ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~1 ' ~ ~4+ ~ ~ .e , • ~ ~ ~ . . % r ,
s ^ . :~s;t ~ } . ~ ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ' { . 13 , 1 . , , ~
I i r . . rl► C ~ ' ~•Il * r{ANL o y '
~ s~ S PO ' , ; ~ t ~~i . ~lO~ t^~• ~t ' , - ~f. ' ,4, zoa~s • ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ` s71• ' • 1 f .
+ . . ~ . ~ o y , ~ ~ zp6 ~~s ~ : . .
, o.~ ~ ~d~~ > r o- ' ~j , ` ~ ~a/r!~ .
„ ~ ~ . ~ - .r ' 'N ~ y . ~ . ~i : . ~
h ~ 11~ ~ . , ~1~ ~ • ~M~ t~: 4 ` ~ 5~1~ •x~ 1 ~ . . 2p ~ . _
:4~ N ~ s ' ' • ~i~ t ~ BLKS s
; FoR ~ i ~ iv ~ i% ~ ~ ~ - ~ ; p , . ~ . , . L t L ~
~ ' . ' ' . uNfY • ' /IO + • ' ~o G, ,o.~ 7 .
PoKAN~ ~p3 p ~ . ' , , , Z . ~ ,~5.2 ~ . ~ . z~5 r , ~ ~ Q . , . . . ~ ~ . .i D ; .
_ ~ ' , ~ ~ - . _ 6 . . .
. y : , ~ . . ""I - ~ ~ ~0 ~ D 4 _ , . ~
~ ~3 . ! ~ ° ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , I ~ _Y
2Z . 9 ~ 1 . • ~ p. '1 ~ ~ ~ "1 : , . . 40 r ' b ~ ,
. "s 4 _ - Z ~ ~ .z 3 32 _ _ ~ . _ 1 ~
. _ _ ~ , ~ ~ F~ 3~ ~e ~ ,a ~I I . F~ _ - ~
--r.'' . - , „,~+m ' D 1 ~ \ + ~ ~ r _ , ~ _ ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ - ,
. 1 : . ~ _ _ . ~ 1 , . 1 _ o. 1 , ~ ~ , , _ _ , s ee ~ rr-
;i. i t, x - G I ' ' - ~ : . ` Z~i ~ , ,
' ~ / ~ ~ o' . D I I ~ _ - ~ ~ , - a ~ . - - ~1 ~ ~ i - i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ M . ~2 1 t, r , 1~ ~ r~ . p I I _ ~ I ~ <y ~ . 9 5.1 t ~ 1--~
1 ~ , ~ _ 31 .6 . l.- ~ _ . _ . r... . 1 y t ~ - s ti , 0 ~ ~ S . l
~ • r + ~"O ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ! 1 9 ~ . . . . ~ b , ♦ / ~,.,,.r 1
- ''j ~ . 2 h . _ o i ~ - . A . , I ~ _ z
~a' `,j r+ 4 ' ~ ` ~ e~ . ~y . ~ 1 r '
~ • N } 1 . ~ 19 0, . , . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ i5. ~ i
a 1 ~ t , fB ~ ~ ~ , I _ i . . .
, u y I , ,~v~r~5-ivrl. C.HJPfhI i -
,
~ > >
i -
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPAKTMENT
APPLICATION FQR ZQIM REC'I1,Q,,SSIFIGATI4N
Datc• 6/7/89 Application No: _Z460-
Namc of Applicant; Wlnvest Development Co.
, Scrccc Address of Applicant; c/o Stanley R. Schultz, 1900 Sedfirst Financ
Center
City: Spokane S tatt: WA • Zip Code: 99201 TC1C. No. 838-6131
Namc of Propcrty Owncr(s): Unlversity city znc.
Authorized Agcnt rcprescnting Owncr
(if othcr than ownCr); Stanley R. Schultz, At,torney
Existing Zoning Classification: Commercial & MFS
Datc Existing Zonc Classification Establishcd: -7 v-
Existing Use of Propcrty: Shoppinq Center
Proposcd Zone Classification: B-3
Proposcd Usc of Property: ShoAr)inq Center
Legal Dcscription of Propcrty: iittach
,
~
Section: Township: ~s Range: L14- ~
~
Source of Lcgal: Survey 4AMY e-y4dwda
' j
Asscssor' s Parcel No: 2os4 i-o 10 8j o30~,03 ) 0~04. I
~r (see tax statemcnt)• . 3c.; s
Property S iZe: ~It ;~,Frontage: 17 Feet On:
Total amount of adjoining land controlled b this owner r spons r, MX,(fAG
. ~
S trcct Address of thc Propcrty: ~ .
If you do not hold title to the propcrty affected by this application, what is
your interest in it? Optionee under option to purchase
Plcasc Iist previous Planning De artment actions involving this property.
Z E- 5 0-- e 7
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED;
1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which u feel make
this proposal warranted? Expanded commercial gro~t~, improved
traffic circulation; availability of access to sewer;
development of transit center adjacent to property.
2. ',rYhac effect wiil the propascd zonc reclassi:icasior have n the d' e n t
properties? Increased traf f ir ; increase in va~ue o~ ~a~~ acent
commercial properties; see Environmental Lnecxiist.
This section of the application wiIl provide the Planning Department's staff
with writtcn verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation
with che agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should
be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning
Department.
,
;
Ul- nt4 iW 1 NSTON 1 CA5NA`l'T
~
• ,
~J
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PAGE TWO
(University City Shopping Center)
1 QOUNTY ENS'ME.R'S OFEICE
A preliminary consultation has bccn hcld to discuss the proposal. Our
require nts for submictal of chis proposal for rezone have been
satisfie
)
(Si gna r ~ (Date)
T2. COUM UTILITIES QFFIC'E
A preliminary consulcacion has bcen held to discuss the proposal. Our
requiremcncs for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been
satisficd. Thc dcsignatcd watcr p rveyor for this site is
97
(Signature) (Date)
3 _vygU R E -0 V FLYOR
~
.
ZjE~ -/8-8~7 a) The proposa (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service
area ~
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal. '
aK.,
. , 4
-]?t j;? 9 .
r ~ CA
(S ignature) ate) ~
4 BUILDING AND S,AEETY DEPAKTME
A preliminary consultation has been hcld to discuss the proposal. Our
rcquirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been
satisficd. This proposal is locatcd in Firc District # I . ,
Q Q C91-7 f 0'3
( g n ure~ (Datc)
~
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A prcliminary consultation has been hcld to discuss the proposal. Thc
applican has been informcd of our rcquircmcnts and standards
(Signature) ate)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY
THAT THE ABOVE RESPQNSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT jAMTHEOVCqERQF CQRD OF THE SITE
PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE
OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM
SAID OWIVER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
(Signcd): Datc:
(Address): Plione:
Zip•
.
N OTAR Y: Datc:
NOTARY SEAL:
SIl URE Q~ IPP ICANT OR AGEN''
\
~ I? ~T Da te:
, . ,
,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATTON FOR CIiANGE QF CONDTtjONS
ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZQNING
Date 6 /7/8 9 Application No. : .ZZ-
Name of Applicant: Wlnvest Development Company
Street Address of Applicant: c/o Stanley R. Schultz, 1900 Seafirst Financi
City: Spakane S tate: wA Zip Code: 99201 Tele. No. : Center
Existing Zone Classification: B-3
` Date Existing Zone Classification Established: March 3, 1988
Legal Description of Property: Attached
. ~
~
Section: Township: Range:
Source of Legal: Survey
Asses sor' s Parcel No. :(S ee Tax S tatement)
PRQPOSED CHANGE OF CONI?ITIOWS ~
Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval. (Cite the applicable
condition from the Findings and Order of the HEARING EXAMINER
COMMIT"I'EE' s public hearing), ;
Condition D.1.14; D.2.6; D(a) 1-4, 10, 11, 12; D(b) 4, 5
~
Give detailed explanation of request for change in status of the proposal.
This parcel was originally zoned for a parking lot only.
The parcel is now part of a plan to expand University City.
The plan requires structures to be placed on this property.
IF DEVELOPNiENT OF THE SITE WILL BE CHANGED SUBSTAN-
TIALLY 8Y THIS REQUEST. OR THE PROPERTY HAS BOUNDARIES
DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINALLY PROPOSED, A REVISED DEVELOP-
MEN T P LAN MjS B E S U B MITTED. ~
SIGNATURE OF A.PPLICANT OR AGENT
Address, if different than Applicant 14'0 o rr.~~
A
, St
i
.
SFOK:A►NE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPL.ICATIONS BEPORF THE tiOIVINC A12Jj,jSTnR/ROARD OF ADnUSThEN_T
Certificate of Excmption No.: Application No.:~40w3s" g~
Name of Applicant: (A) ik Agcnt- Y N
S trcet Address:L.~,/ 5L~.1.'~'-~ (G 0 b
Zip ~ Phonc - Homc~~s
City State: W-A Codc: Woric:-r-aY /.3)
Agents No.
Name of Property Owner(s)• 0 ik- s
Slreel Addtess:,-~~ i ~ fiawik- 04Ft,- ~ ici S
Zip Phonc - Home:
Clcy:_,00 LfAh-- State: ~d Code: Work:
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriatc action):
('Variance(,s)') Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use
Waiver of Violation Temporary Use/Structure Other:
FOR S'i'AFF USE QNLY. CODE. ORDINANCE
Cite Regulatlons Section(s)• f
Propcrty Violation/ •
Section• Township• Range Size: Enforcement: Y N
Existing Zone: Comp Plan Des.: Crossover
LEGAL
PSSA; Y N UTA: Y N ASA: Y N /FIRE DI$.T.; CHECKED BY:
Hearing Date- Personnel Taking in Application:
Existing Use of Property:
J
Descnbe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUEST'ED AC'TIONS above•
r"A t Q a +'~-~S SLY rv-: I
00- / ~
74,..Ay.'i t 1 /1
Street Address of Proparty:
Legal Descriptlon of Property (includc easomant, if applicable):
,
Parcel No(s) Z~S~~-~~~~i d~~o3,0~0~1ourc~e of Legal? ~
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor:_.Od.,,.y. ar*ca-Y
What interest do you hold ia the property?
,
Please list previous Planning Departmenl acl1ons involving this property.
I S WEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERNRY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OVVNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE, (2) IF NOrI' THE OWNER, WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS
ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESFONSES AND THOSE ON SUPFORTINC3
DOCUMMF.NTS ARE MADE TR Y Ar.~ ^~'O T FST OF OWI.EDGE
Signed: ~ . ,
Address
Phone No.- ~3~ d 13~ Date.-K~&-
NOTARY SEAL Notary.
Date.
Page 3 of 4 (Over) Revised 3-4-88
P
,
•
a. Bt1RDEN OF PRQOF
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her rcpresentative to establish the reasons
why the REQUESTED ACTION should bc approved and to litcrally put forih the basic
case. Accordingly, you sbould have bcen given a form for your requcsted action
(vanance, conditioaal use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way
which addresses the cntena wbich the Zoning Adjustor must consider Please fill
the form out and retum it with your application If you did not get a form, ask the
Plann,ng Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
lf.
1. COt1NTY HEALTH DISTRICT,
a) Proposed method of water suppl
b) Proposed method of sewage posal.
~
A preliminary consultation h ecn hold to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has beea informed of r rements and standards.
(Signaturc) (Datc) (Sign-off Waived)
2. CO_UNTY ENCINEERING DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has been ' rmzd y requirements and standards. -•r.~`~ ( "7 04- 1-5-9111
(Signaturc) (Date) ' (Sign•off Waived)
3. CQUNTY, UTILITIES DEPARTMENT auvc if outside WMAB)
A prcliminary consultation been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informed requirements and standards.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off yVaived)
The applicant is equired to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system ~
requiremen and standards. ,
The a cant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of sewage disposal
c iremeats and standards.
4. • (Wsiye Jf outside CWSSA)
a) The proposal isrs ~not loc d within the boundary of our future
service area.
b) The proposal located within the boundary of our current
district.
c) We arelare le to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory rangements havelhave not been made to serve this
proposal.
(Signatu (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
S. SEWERAGE PLIRVEYORr.
(If o r tban Spokane County)
A preliminary cons ation has been held to discuss the proposal
The applicant ha bccn informed of requirements and standards.
~
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
Page 4 of 4
,1
.
♦ / ~ ] b
Numbec
OTANE COUN?Y EN-vr'INBER
P R E L I?i I N A R Y C 0 N S U G? A T I 0 K
p. Pruject Namc: cr
PROPOSAL Numbec of Peceels:
Section :;~O T. N., R. ~E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3 4
DBYELOPER Na»e: vf- C,
or AcJdress:_L4n ~O 40 e- -z'
ACENT Fhone : 8us lness llocne
N.ime :
OWNER Acldress :
Ptione: 6usiness !lome
Na m e: ~3::~Y CD I~ L-32 EI~GINEER Aciclress / c~ Phone: eusiness ~3 Uume
_ r
B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Oate: aY: ~
<
Preliminary a) Rtglit-of-Way Y~e-~
Conditioas b) Curb
c ) SLJevalk }~-P ~ . ~ ' b
d ) P3ve
e) Approaches YP s .
f ) Dreinage 'Y~ g
g) State/City Review ' Yes Na
Remarks :
. , .
,
hUTE: ThIs proposal m«st cumrly wl,th Spokane Gounty ReFulntlons for itoads, Ap-
proach and Dcaicsap .tn Nev Construction; 6oard of 'Co4tity Gocnmissioiiere Kesulutloll
No. 8U--1592 as amended. Conditions are preliooinary and cuay ctiotige ufter field in-
spection and reviev of Coun[y recocds. ~
C. IN5PECTION Date: / i BY: Remarks: ,
.R
D. SPECIPIC CONDI'IIONS:
qn
Fee Pa id : Ye s No Amount t Clieck
Planning Applicat on Signed: Date By: _
,
E. P INAL p LAT CEiECR.B
Fee Paid: Date Amount Clieck Cash
Hathematical b Surveying Checks:
No. 1 Date 8y
No. 2 Ua[e By
No. 3 Da [ e By
Additional mathematicAl and Sucveying Ctiecks:
No. 4 Uate By F'ce Amt.6Dt.Yd.
No. S Date 8y Fcc Amt.bDt.Yd.
No. 6 Date By Fee 11mt.bU[.4'd.
No. 7 Date By F'ee AwC.bOt.Pd.
1J81
r a
. . . ~ ' tr
6`
UFF I CE Ut= THE COUN"fY ENG 1 NEER
SPOk AfVF COUN7Y, WASHINGTON
AUqUs t 1, 1989
T0: SPOk AIJE COUfVTY PLANIJIIJG DEPARTItiEiVT (Current Rlanninq
Administrator)
FHOM: SI'Ok AhlE COUhII"Y ENGINEER
SUBJa ZE 18-89 (Winvest Develc-pment Inc. ) ConcJitions of
Appr-Dval f-Dr Zone Lhanqe reqi_iest.
re: Zc1ninq
On Ji-ily 18, 1989 the applicant agreed to and siqned a Mitiqated
Ueterminatic-n of N-Dnsiqnificance "MDNS". The Mllh1S maE es
reference ta the atl;ached memorandum from the Cc-i_tnty Enqineer
dated Ji_ine 21, 1989. We reqLtest that the mitiqatinq measLtres as
identified in the memorandum be incli_tded within the Pl.anninq
DEpartment Rep-Drt tc- the Hearinq Examiner Cc-mmittee as
"Conditzons of Apprc-val". This will provide a comprefiensive
pac~ et for aqency review at ttie time ofi bi_ti ldinq permit review.
I
QFF!CE 0F "fHE COUIV-fY ENG 1 NEER
SPOk ANE COUIVTY, WASH I IVGTON
ALt qLi s t 1,
T0: SPOk ANE COUNTY PLAhIIVING DEPARTMENT (Cijrrent Plannino
Administrator)
FROM: SF'Ok.ANE COUNTY EfVGIfVEER
SUBJo ZE 18-89 (Wxnvest Uevelopment Inc. ) Conditions of
Approval f-Dr I-wInp Chanqe reqijest.
re: Zc-ninq
On Jijly 18, 1989 the applicant aqreed to and siqned a Mitiqated
Uetermination of Nonsiclnificance "MDIVS". The h1DNS maE es
reference to the attacl-ied memorandiAm from the C-DiAnty Enqineer
dated June -'19 1989. We reqi_test that the mitiqatinq measi_tres as
identified in the mem----randum be included within the Planninq
Department Report to the Hearinq Examiner C-Dmmittee as
"Conditic-ns of Approva1 This wi 1 1 prc-vide a comprehensive
pacE et for aqency review at the time of bi_iildinq permit review.
.
7~ y
/
RECEtPT Date l - ~i --'~19 A 0856
Received From
,
Add ress a ~4 ~ ~ t ; ~ V ~'F' ~ .
,
/('~41,-A 0 Dollars $ r; ~~L?o, '
For
ACCOUNT HOW PAID ~
AMT OF rr ^ w /
ACCOUNT ~ I CASH
~ ' ~ ~ ~=''r-`
AMT PAID CHECK ~ ! .J~C`Cn~PO 1
; BA CE MONEY
DUE I 1 O OER ~ I gV
!
8K808 (TMFQ(tM
SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK GF&dl,tV& f a~ 19-2 ~5 6 9 ~
_,~~r SPOKA►J£ AND EASTERN BRAfJCH
!1`~ SPdKANE WASHINGTDN 39201 1 ~Z~JO
_ L A W Y E R S~,
r~ 4c . ~ ♦ ~ , t
A Prvjessronal Servta Co►yonahon z n'' ~ a u~•`~~+ ~ V~' _ ~ „
. SeaFirst Financial Center
Spokane, Washington 99201-0695
~
Date Check iVo" Amount
t~..~ ~6/ ~ *'2 0 0 0 0 °
8~ t
i=`~~'~~ ~ f .t« :.~W"~~,,""' ~ ~ •
~~*********Two Hundred'&~'00/1'00
TOTHE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
,
ORDER
OF
< A Pmfcssionqi Smtia Corpwal
By
~ AS ITS AUTHORIZED R~'.DRESENTATIVE
0 5 5 6 90ii' i: 1 2 50000 2LO: L 3 6 6 L 00 4I''
,
,
Nurnber ~C`,~ P_~ U
5 P 0 K A N E C 0 U N T Y E N G I N E E R
P R E L I M I N A R Y C 0 N S U L T A T I 0 N
A. f'ruject Name: u - c (
PROPOSAL NLimber of Parc:els' J
Section ~ O T. &1-5 N., R. L.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3 4
DEVELOPER Vnlne : ~ ~I! ~ t/ P ~ ~ ~.v~/~ ' f~~► '
o r AJ J r e s s: /n J;
ACENT Phone: Buciricss P
Nnrn e : ,S
OWNER Acl d r e s s:
Phone: Business lloine
tda m e :
ENGINEER Ac.fc1 r e s s o/v 0
Phone: Business Ilome
B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Da te : d' ~ By : ~h
Preliminary a) Rtght-of-Way
Condi[ions b) Curb Y-P S°
c ) Stclewalk
d) Pave
e) Approaches
f ) Urainlge
g) State/City Review ~ Yes O No (t~'
Remarks .
; . , r ✓
h'UTE: Thts pruposai m«st cor,ipty with Spokane Coticity P.egulations for ftoacls, /1p--
proach and Drainage in New Construction; Boarcl of Couiity Commissioiicrs Kesulutton
No. 80-1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary anJ may cliange after field iri-
spection and review of County records.
C. INSPECTION U,ite: l i BY: .
Remarks: ~
D. SPECIFIC COlJDITIONS:
, ~
Fee Paid : Yes No 1~moun[ $ v' ~ 11-1. Check ~ 5 G t~
Plannin8 APPlication 5iRried: Date BY:
E. F II1AL PI.AT CHECKS
Fee Paid: Date Amount Clieck Cas11
Ma[hematical & Surveying Checks:
No. 1 Da te By ,
No, 2 Uate By
No. 3 Date By ,
Additional mathematical and Sucveying Cliecks:
No. 4 Date by Fce tlmt.bUt.l'd.
No. S Date By E'cc Atnt.bUt.l'd.
- No. 6 Date By Fee 11rnt.6Ut.F'ci.
No. 7 Date Dy Fee AmC.bOt.Pd.
1/81
hhh,
Fi9 ? 3 Abt ►R►1 NSTON t, GAS}iATT
'J •
• ' ` I
ti
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING I7EPARTMENT
APPLICATION FQB~ZOLYE..BECI.A.S~IFICATI4N
Datc: 6/7/8 g Application No. _ZjC'
Name of Applicant: Wlnvest Development Co.
Street Address of Applicant; c/o Stanley R. Schultz, 1900 Sedfirst Finar~,i
Center
City. Spvkane Scate: w"• 2ip Code- 99201 Tclc No 83 8_6131
Namc of Propcrty Owncr(s), University city Zizc.
Authorizcd Agent rcpresenting Owner
(tf othCr than pwnCr), Stanley R. SclZUlLz, AI.LUrney
Existing Zoning Classification Conunercial & MFS
Date Existing Zone Classification Established ~
Existing Use of Propcrty; shoppinq Center
Proposcd Zone Classification: B-3
Proposcd Use of Property; ShotDiDina Center
Lcgal Dcscription of Proncrty• At~~ d
Section ~ J Township: ~2S Range Zl-
~
Source of Legal. Survey
Assessor's Parcei No• (see tax statement):
Property S lze• a)~,Fron tage: ~ 76D Feet On ~rstr- Tota l amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or None
S treet Address of the Property:
If you do not hold titlc to the property affected by this application, what is
your interest in it? Opti-onee under option to purchase
Plcase Iist previous P1ann2ng Departmcnt actions 1nvoIving this property,
ZE-50-87
ALL OF 7'HE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED,
1, Whac are the changed conditions of the site area, which ou feel make
thts proposal warranted? Expandec~ comrnercial gzo~~th, improved
traffic circulation; availability of access to sewez;
development of transit center ad3acent to property.
2 What effect wili the proposed zone reclassification have Qn the VA
ent
roperties9 Inereased traffir; increase in va.iuc o~D cicent
p
cornmercial properties; see Envizonmentai cr►ecxizsr..
~
TEiis section of the appiicatlon will provide the Planning Department's staff
with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation
with the agencies identified Results of the preliminary consultation shouid
be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning
Department.
' iDr107u821• U9 33 AM tWINSTON I CASHATT
~
: -
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PAGE TWO
(University City Shoppi.ng Center)
1 CQ_ UN-TY, EN~ER'S QFFICE ~
A preliminary consulcatian has been hcld to dtscuss the proposai. Our
requirem ncs for submittal of chis proposal far rezone havc been
~
sati4ur
(Sigv N--
(Date)`
2. CQC1NTY UTIL=S OEB.CF
A prcliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
rcquircmcnts for submittal of chis proposal for rczonc have been
satisfied Thc designated watcr p rveyor for this sitc is
~ 4,7
(Signature) (Dat~
,%gTFR P VR vFLYaR
(NA MEL-DltTL~
3 V
~
a) The proposa (is not) locatcd wichin the boundary of our service area (LS2,) b) Satisfactory arrangcments (have) (have not) been madc to servc this 5-~
ro osal.
~
----We~a-r
~
~ <
41-
(Signaturc) atc)
4BUIL12ING AND SAFETY I?EPA&TMENT
A preliminary consultation has been hcld to discuss thc proposal Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezonc have been
satisfied This proposal is located in Firc District
C:~/-7
( g nu re~ (Date)
~
5. CQ.uN'I'Y HEALTH DIST~
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposai The
applicant has been informcd of our rcquiremcnts and standards
~ .
(Signature) ( ate)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY
THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TD
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
,QQRD OF TH E S I TE
I F U RTH ER S W EA R TH AT JAM THE OWjNER OF
PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE
OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FR4?vf
SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHAI.F
(Signed) Datc
(Address)• Plione
Zip.
N OTAR Y: Datc•
NOTARY SEAI.: SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN'T OR AGENI'
Dacc•
. `f
.
~
OF=FIGE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
Sl='C11,ANF COUIUTY 9 WASH J IuCTOh!
JLt ne .21 9 1'9 8':-3
1o: SpoE ane C----IAnty Planning DAGartment (Ci_trrent Planninq
Administrator )
Fr---,m: SP-:4ane CountY Fnqirieer's Dapartment ~
Si_tbaectd Conditions o~ Apprclval Z----ne Chanqe N--_-: ZE 18-89
Appla.cants Name Wxnvesi, Devel-Dpmer►t Cc-
w.t?, TrJwnship 215 N, Rariqe 4-4 EWM
re: Zoninq
-fhe fol ] owinq Mx.tiQating I`1easi_tres arP sLtbmitted for inclusic-In ir-, a
Mitiqated Determination of NoDn Siqnificance (MDNS ) fc-r the ah.--.ve
referenced _-One chancle proposal. -rhese mitzqatinq measures are
necessary to mitiqate traffic and other impacts directly re1ated tcl a
pr.=i)ect -Df thx.s maqnx.ti_tdea Tfie requ«.rements pr-esented herein are
based up-Dn trip distr-ibu{;icon data provided to the County Enqineer by
i;he znaineer for the prclposeci dEVeloprnento Authority f----r the
ImpC-sitzcin c-f these r-zql_iiremei-its is f----,_tnd wa.thzi-i tl-ie StaLe
E n v i ron m e n ta1 P-D1 1. Cy A Ct aCl C~ BocZ Y d Of C-Di_l fl ty GOm m x sSiOr) eY S f7 E' So7ut1cin
8()-1J'9.:e
In additic-n tc- includinq these reqi_tir-ements in the MDIVS, we reqi_te5t
ti-,at they be presented in the Planninq Report t-D the County Hearina
E•%aminer Cc-immitteeo They sN~.-Juld be made Cc-ndztic-i`ia c-f Appr-Dva1
5hould the proposal be approved Ly tFie Comma.ttee at the pLkblic
he a r i n U s c h e du1 e d JlA1 v 198q.
Pra.._.r to the release of a bi_ti ldinq permit cor lAse of tr~~ ~rclperty as
proposed :
1. Appl i cant sfiaY 1 peti{:ic-ri the B-DarrJ ~.~If C.-Junty GOmmissioners f---Ir
tl-ie vacation ----f Dartmouth Rcnad from Spraqi_te to ti-ie Mi lwau[ee
R-Dad R. Op Wa
Applicant shall dedicate riqht -Df way a1onq University Rc.ad
c-Dnsistent witl-i tl-ie plan view of the a1 Lqnment whicl-i is attachp-d
and made a part Of the recc-rd. The r1Qht ----f way dedi ratx---.n is
as fo1 1ows-.
1. A22' 24' trianqle at tl-ie n----rtriwest c-Drner c-f #2',
fr-w~m th~e e~%~.sta~nq R. Oo W. f~ ~r 18G' s- -i_ttfi f #1,
3. A transx.ta.cin from 3'D9 tcl 27' fr-r-m trie exist,xnq R. On Wa
f r _26:6' s out h of -
4. :._'7' f r c-m t t~~ ~ ex1 s t i n q R . Cl . W o f or 1 4(=). ~ ~ ~ ~~lut h ~ ~ f #%'-:J',
5. A . : ' 7 ' ~ , , .27' t ri a n q 1 e at t heSOUt hw e s t c-_.r n e r Of#4
!
.
~
e ZE 18-89 Paqe 2
6. Ac cess permits for- approaches t.--- the County Rc-ad System shal 1 be
okrtalned fr-Dm the Gc-i_tnty Eriqineero
7. Appl z cant shal. 1 zmpr.--Ive University Road west of the section
line, fr-Dm SpraqLte Ave. to_) i;fieir south prc-perty line iri
accordance wzth the approved typzcal cross section(s) Con file
with tfie County Eriqirieer' s C7fficeo The plan view of this
aliqnment is attached and made a part -_,f the rec-Drd.
8. Applicant shall imprc-ve the Spraque Ave. University Rclaci
inL'ersectzon as necessary, Lnc1uding upgradinq or- replsci.nq tFie
existinq siqnal sysl:erri, to ccinform to the reyi_tired imprcivements
to University road south of Spraqi_te Ave.
9. Appl x.cant Sriai i cr-►nstruct a secc-nd west b~~-und left ti_trn ].arie on
Spraqi_te Ave. at l.Jniversity R---.ad as recc-mmended in the traffic
impact study.
10o Applicant shall c-Dnstri_tct a free ra.qht tLtrn ]ane on University
Road, S~ _-uth of Spraqi_te Avc.,a-s recommended zn the tra i fa.c
impact sti_tdya
11. Applicant shall cc-nstri_tct a new siqnal system at 4th Avee on
University R,_--ad, as rec-Dmmended in the traf fic impact sti_tdy.
1.~. Appl~.cant shall c~~nstr~_~ct ctianneli:ati~~n m~~difxcat~~~ns ~~n
Spraqi_ie Ave. as recomrnended in the final appr-oved traffiir
circiAlati-Dn and parE inq plan.
13. Applicant shall relocate or reco-nnstruct the existinq Felts R-Dad
traffic Siqnal on Spragi_te Ave. as rec-Dmmended in the firial
apprcnved traffz c czr culata.on and par~ing plane
14. App].icant sFiall si_ibmit f-Dr approval by the SpcoEar» C~~lunty
Enqineer r-r_-ad, drainage and access plans fcor the reqi_tireci
improvementso
15. The applicant shall si_tbmit fi-_ir approval by the SpoVane CID+Anty
Enqlneer and tFie SpoE ane Cc-uni;y Healtt-i I?istrict a c~etailed
combineCil cin-site sewaqe system plan and si_trface water cix.~posal
plan for tf-ie entxre project car portion therpof if the
develc-pment is phased.
1F, e A parE inq plan and traffiic circi_tlatic-n plan shal be si_tkama.l,~ed
ai-id appr----ved by the Sp~-_4 ane C----,_tnty Enqineer. The desxqn,
].ocatzon and arranqement ._If parE inq stalls shall be in
acc-Drdance with standard eriqYneerinq practices. Pavinq cor
sur-facY ng a-, apprcived by thiP C-Di_tnty Enqx neer wrl l bz irecli_« red
fC1r a!'1 y pr-IYt1ciI"1 o'f thE' P Y..-i)eCt Wh1 C("I 1 S to be coC Cul] L C-'d or
-L-rave]ed by vehicles
.
►
ZE 18-89 Pa9e 13
17. The constructic-n c-f the roaciway xmprovements stated her ein shal 1
be acccimplished as apprc-ved by the Sp-_4ane C-Junty Enqineer.
18. Al l reqija.red impr-Dvement5 sfial 1 cor~forrn t---- tl-ie c►_trrent State ~---f
Washinqton Stai-idard Specificatiowins for Road and Bridqe
constructi-Dn and other applicable cc-i_inty standards and/or
adopted resc-11_ttic-Ins pertaininq pertaininq t---l R-,Iad Standards and
5tormwater Manaqement in effECt at the ciate c-f cc-nstruction,
i_inl?ss otherwise approved by ti-ie County Cngzneer.
1'jti Access tc.- the former Mil.wai_4 ze Rc-ad RY qht of Wav shal] be
prohibited, both from tl-ie szte and fr-rIm Wali7i_tt Road.
Lc;)e Roadway stanclardsy typical r-Dadway sections and drainaqe plan
requirements are found zn SpoE ane Board of Cc-unty CofT1tT11551oners
resolutxon 80-1592 as amencied and are applicable to tfiYs
prop-Dsal.
25. A1 1 reqLtired construction within the existinq -zir prop.---sed pLtbl i c
riqht of way is to be completed prior tc- tfie release ----f a
buildinq permit c-r a bc-nrJ iri ari amc-i_tnt estimated by the Coi_tnty
Enqineer- t---- CoVeY the C-.-jSt !--f CoflstYuCt1oI-1 or LmprOV2fTICl'1t5 5F'icil 1
be filed wzth the Cc-o_tnty Erigineer.
2, 1 4 t r--- .
,
iy
' ~ Z.. 44' ~ -
~
' `
~,N
~G•2 ~t,`
( r • - ' ~
,
,
- , ~
, 1 j ~ _t._...~- ~ ~ ~
' , •
I '
1 pi ,
~
, SPOKANE E vIROTIMENTAL ORDINArICE
~ (WAC 197-11-970) Secaon 11 10 230 (3) Mitigated Deterrrunation of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
MITIGA►TED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
FILE NO(S) ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87, VE-38-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone reclassificaaon from Cornmercial (C) and MultAple
Fanuly Suburban (NIFS) to Regional Busutess (B-3); a change of pnor condiuons of approval
to allow structures to be located on ground previously luzuted to parking lot(s); and a variance to
allow fewer pariQng spaces than requu-ed by zonung regulanons all associated wnth a major
expansion/remodelulg of University Shopping Center from a community shopping center to a
reglonal shoppmg center.
PROPONENT• Winvest Development Co. % Stanley Schultz
LOCA.TION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY:
Generally located south of Sprague Avenue between Walnut and University Roads, in the
Spokane Valley in the N 1/2 of Section 20, Township 25 N, Range 44, EWM, Spokane
County, Waslungton; Umversity City Shopping Center.
I.FAD ACENCY: SPOKANE COUNT'Y
The lead agency for thls proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse unpact on the envunnment if nutigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is n4t requlmd under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed envunnmental checklist and other informauon on file with the lead
agency This uiforaaaaon is available tD the pubhc on request.
This NIDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regazding this
MDNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p m, August 22nd, 1989, if they are
intended to alter the MDNS.
lY1ITIC ATIN= MEASURES:
I acknowledge and agree to all the nutigating measures per the attached memorandum dated June
21, 1989 (from the office of the County Engineer) to the modifications and adjustments to the
above descnbed proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures
in the future.
Date , 1/1 ~l Pnn Nane: tanlex Schultz. Attornev for Winvqg
Develoment Cqmpanv
Signat~re
Resnansible Officlal: by Thomas G. Mosher, AICP, Seruor Planner
Posiaon(I'itle. Snokane Countv Senior Planner Phone: (509) 456-2205
Addre_ss N 721 Jeffers okane. WA 9Q2fZQ,
Comments regarchng environmental c s wel o e t the ' g.
Date Issued. Julv 25. 1989 Si ng a=.
*
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after i be omes final, may be made to Spokane
County Planning Department, at N 721 Jefferson S pokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadluie, being ten (10) calendar days after
the sigrung of the Decision. This appeal must be wntten and make specific factual objecaons.
Contact the Plannuig Department for assistance wnth the specif'ics of a SEPA appeal.
A copy of the MDNS was mailed to:
1 WA State Deparnnent of Ecology(Olympia)
2. VVA State Department of Transportation(Olympia)
3 Spokane County Air Pollunon Control Authonty
4 Spokane County Health Ihstnct
5 Spokane County Shenff s Office
6 Spokane County Building & Safety
7. Spokane County Utihties
8. Spokane County Enguieers
9. Planning Manager-City of Spokane
10 Fue Distnct No. 1
11. Modern Electnc Water Company
12 Valley Garbage Sernce
OFFICE OF THE COUN7Y ENGZNEER
. SPOKANE GQUNTY, WASHXNGTON
June 21, 1989
Toe Sp~:4ane County Planning Department (Current Planning
Administrator)
From: Sp-Dkane County Engineer,s Department f**\
Sub.}ect: Conditions of Approval Zone Change No: ZE 18-89
Applicants Name Winvest Development Co
Section 20, Township 25 N. Range 44 EWM
re: Zoninq
The full-nwing Mitiqating Measures are submitted for a.nclusion xn a
Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (MDNS) far the above
referenced zone change proposal. These mitigating measures are
necessary to mztigate traffic and other impacts directly related to a
project of this magnitude. The requirements presented herein are
based up-Dn trip distribution data provided to the County Engineer by
the engineer for the proposed development. Authority for the
impcisition c-f these requirements is found within the State
Envirc-nmental P.--)licy Act and Board of County Commissioners Resolutiun
80-1592. '
In additic-n to including these requirements in the MDNS, we request
that they be presented in the Planning Report to the County Hearing
Examiner Cc-mmittee. They should be made Conditions of Approval
should the pr-Dposal be approved by the Ci:,mmittee at the public
hearing scheduled Julv : Q. 1985.
Pri-Dr t-D the release of a building permit cor use uf the property as
prc-posed :
Appl i cant shal 1 petition the Board of County C-Dmmissioners for
the vacation of Dartmouth Road from Spragiae to the Milwaukee
Rc-ad R. 0. W.
Applicant shall dedicate right of way along University Road
c-Dnsistent wa.th the plan view of the alignment which is attached
and made a part uf the record. The ri4ht of way dedication is
a s fo1 1ow s:
1. A?2' x?4' triangle at trie northwest corner of #2,
39' frum the existing R.O.W. for 18E' south of #1,
3. A transitir-in from 39' ta 217' from the existinq R.O. W.
for 266' scouth of
27' from tFie e•r.isting R. 0. W. for 140.61 sauth of #3,
5. A 27' x.27' triangle at the siDuthwest corner of #4
~
a
~
.
.
~
,
,
,
,
,
~
ZE 18-89 page 2
6. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Enqineer.
7. Applicant shall improye University Road west of the section
line, from Spraque Ave. tc, their soLtth property line in
accordance with thie approved typical cross section(s) on file
with the County Engineer's Office. The plan view of this
alignment is attached and made a part of the record.
8. Applicant stiall improve the Sprague Ave. - University Road
intersection as necessary, including upgrading or replacing the
existing signal system, to conform to the required improvements
t-D University Road south of Sprague Ave.
9. Applirant shall construct a second west bound left turn lane on
Sprague Ave. at University Road as recommended in the traffic
impact study.
10. Applicant shall construct a free right turn lane on Universx.ty Qq
Road, South of Sprague Ave.,as recommended in the traffic
i m p a c t s t ia d y./ [ l f ~ mc,4 a~. s~ 9 t~ ~ s y s~+~►
~Yj T'I+4 C ✓Gjir ~-~o.T !'iG JS 1i~3h-10~ ~ GaY~STI-~7G`It~7
w, G}-r. :*y r►.YSd $=p v r-4Yl c L.. s re-r i-l-s e- c v rrs.ryt ~+lr°~ d y~'~`'~' Y• r~ ro.~s ~
i l. App lican t s ha l l cons truc t a ne w s i g n a l s y s t e m a t 4 t h A v e. on
University Road, as recommended in the traffic impact study.
12. Applicant shall constrLtct channelization mudifications on
Sprague Ave. as recommended in the final approved traffic
circulati-Dn and parking plan.
.
13. Applicant shall relocate or reconstruct the existing Felts Road
traffic siqnal Un Sprague Ave. as recommended in the final
approved traffic circulatian and parking plan.
14. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane Caunty
Enqineer rc-ad, drainage and access plans far the required
improvements.
15. The applicant shall submit for approval, by the 5pokane County
Enqineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
cc)mbined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan f-Dr the entire project or pc)rtion thereof if the
development is phased.
16. A parkinq plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and appr-Dved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design,
1-Dcation and arrangement of parl.ing stal ls st-ial l be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Enqineer will be required
f-Dr any portiun of the pr-Dject which is t-D be occiapied or
traveled by vehicles
,
r
r
,
, , .
~
,
n
1
r{
✓ ~
4
ZE 16-89 page 3
17. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall
be acc-Dmplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
18. Al l required imprcivements shal l conform to the current State of
Washinqt-an Standard Specifications for Ruad and Bridge
construction and other applicable county standards and/or
ad-Dpted resolutic,ns pertaining pertaining to Raad Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of Gonstructian,
tanless ottierwise approved by the County Engineer.
19. Access tc- the former MilwaLiE.ee Road Riaht of Wav shall be
pr-Dhibited, both frvm the site and frum Walnut Road.
Roadway standards, typical roadway sectians and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board uf County Commissioners
resolutian 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
25. All required construction within the existing or proposed public
right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a
b+ailda.ng permit or a band in an amaunt estimated by the County
Enqineer t-D c-Dver the cost of canstruction or improvements shall
be filed with the Caunty Engineer.
>
,
,
.
~
,
Q
~
N
ol
~i
~
! 1
t1;
r ~
I l 4 7 6.1 - - - - Z`~ c,n ~ , ~ ,
I ~ • ~ - _ ~ , - - ~ ~
• i ~ + ~ ' i
N
, . ~
. . ~ ~ ~ i -
I'~ I - "t'" ~ - ~ ,
~ I { I
,,~V /
I
' ~
( t
1 f ~
~ i f 1
.-r• f . _ ~ , r ! ~ I ~
i ~ 1 I I ( f ~ ~ ~ ~
~
i
r I r i ~ ~ ~
i ~
i
~ , .
I
~
.
7/20/89 Heanng Review
June 5, 1989
Page 2 -
5. Schreiner Estates
PN-1574-89 Prehminary Plat
7N-21-89 Zone change, AG to SR-1
Sec 4-26-43
Sponsor. A1 Schreiner (Project Planner - Tom Mosher)
6. PE-1437-83 & ZE-82-83 Change of Conditions R.idgemont Estates No. 3
(approved prehminary plat).
Sec 25-25-44
Sponsor: Kenneth Tupper (Project Planner - Tom Mosher)
7. ZE-84A-85 Change of Condiuons
ZE-25-89 Zone Change from AG to B-2
Sec 18-25-44
Sponsor WAM Enterpnses, Inc (Project Planner - John Pederson)
8 ZN-26-89 Zone Change from Unclassified to B-2 and UR-3 5
Sec 30-26-43
Sponsor• Paul G. Hawlans and Robacor Associates (Project Planner - Paul
Jensen)
9. ZE-27-89 Zone Change from AG and Commercial and RMH to B-2 and SR-1/2
Sec 13-25-44
Sponsor. (Project Planner - Tom Mosher)
tw ~ • , ~ ~
S Zc~
ZL:' -90 A'9 7
` V6_ - 33 -85
6D -
S U,-.s ~ - ~-►~~~.s-~ ~)e 'Ve I o CMe V\.+
P
.
. '
qr »t..' t 1 3 t't r/
3 s '~Y~ ~ 1 Li(
PLAN~IIfVG DEPARTMENT
~
BROAOWAY CENTRE BSUId01NG N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~ PHONE 456-2205
SPOK7INE, WASHINGTON 99260
r 1 sl ] , 4 v.
SPOKANC COUNTV GpURT MOUSC
MEMORANDUM
'PO: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane CountyUrilities
Spokane County Health Distnct
Spokane County Department of Bwlding & Safety
Fire Protecnon Distnct #1 and #3 and #8 and #9
Water Purveyor: Vera Water & Power, Hutchinson's Imgation,
Spokane County Water Ihsmct #3
,
FROM• Thornas G. Mosher, AICP, Seruor Planner
DATE• June 6, 1989
SUBJECT: Review and comments for below hsted plats for the heanng of July 20,
1989.
Please review and return any comments for the following files by June 23, 1989.
u,r~ece,n,n,a~u~ rnz.
1. GE-70-89 (A & B) Cernficate of Exemption Appeal Coyrur)ezzU
Sec. 24-26-43
Sponsor: Franlc M. Wamngton (Project Planner - John Pederson)
2 VE-23-89 (A, B, G, H, & n Vanance from road frontage.
CE-115-89 (A -1) Certificate of Exempnon
Sec 35-26-44
Sponsor: Jerry Hankal (Project Planner - Paul Jensen)
3. VS-31-89 (A & B) Vanance from road frontage.
CE-141-89 (A & B) Cernficate of Exempnon
Sec 6-24-44
Sponsor• Lois Evanoff (Project Planner - John Pederson)
4 WV-37-89 Varlance for road easment
CE-143-89 (A & B) Certificate of Exempaon
Sec 10-24-41
Sponsor Harvey & Frances Cole (Project Planner - Paul Jensen)
~ - _
; . ~ , . A ~ L ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~
I ~ F
f g ~
I ~ ~ } I' • ~ .
1 ~ r
~ ~ I ~~...«~r T ~
a ' ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'e~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i r~~ ` . ~
, ~ . vr 1 i~ ~ ; ~k~ ` ~ L ' _ .
~ ~ , . +i+.~. . , w ' . f ~ ' ~ ~r~
~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ , / ~ ~ -
~ r d ~ ~ ~ z ~ .ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ` - , ~
~ ` ` r , ~ ~
~ i - . ~ . ~
rI 4 S ~ ~
~I f ~ I . ~ , ' } ~ ~ ~ + 7~ . ~ ~ F,~.r 1
~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ r/ R .
~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ 1 ~ , ~
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~
, Fi o ~ ' F ~ ' - ~ I . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i
~ ~ t I ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ , ~ . ~ lr+l ~#LI~, • , ~ ~ ~
, , ~ F~ ~ . . - . . ~ ~ r ' "'~-~~a . + ~ i
~ ~ ' 'w i..~ ~ ~ ~•.~1~ r
~ I ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~R~SC~NT ~ ~ *
I ~ , , • ~•e ~ ~ ! ~ I ~
, ~ , X.~.F~fi~NEY ' 1~4`8 RRYS I r~ ~ ~ i{ ~ ~ R+DS~~~~S r il ~ r ~
~ ~ ~ f ~ ~J . ~
r ~ - : . ~ ~ I ~ . ~r, L~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I ..w~ r ~ . . .
~ ~ ~ Mkrw ~wr ~ ~ ~
. ~ ~ , dr
' ~ ~1 , ' i J ~ I ~ ~ 1 i
~ ~ ~ ti ~ 4~ + ~
~ ~ . , t a ~ , ~ t~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~yr • ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ' ' ~ / ~ ~
.
, ~ . . r ~ , . ~ •
~ . ,
~ ~
f . .
.K ~ ~ .
~ ~ .
~ ~t~~~ ~
4 ■~d ~ 4. . _ . r•~ ~ ~ w a~r rr~*~
~rt,~ ~ r . ~ f ~
~ ~
~ ~
. ~ , ~ r ~
' 1 ~ 1
~
ti ~
+ ~ . ~ .
~ ~
~ . t
i ~ , ~
r , . r ~
~ ~
- . „ ' . ~ .
' ~ . ~ y,~„
~ . . ~
, . +'~~i '
. ' ~ , ~ ~,"r•~ • ~ ' t
~ ' r ' ~ ~ } a ~f' ~ + . ~ ~ Q / ,
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ w ~ ~ , ^w ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ s • ~ . ~ + ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
. f ~`Mr, - , „r ~ ~
~X - j i . . . . I , ~ I
~ ~w~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 1
~ - ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ d•
J'a ; , ' . ~ ~ ~ " 't~w r ~ ~
, ~ + # . , i r ~ I ~ ~ , - l ~
~ , ~ . ~ ~ f. , ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
t ~ s~ ~ , ~
- - ; ° i ~ °1+~ . ~ ~ , ~ .
• . r.~. x' _ ~ ~ r~ ~ r ,,,n, G~ ~
, ~ ~ ~
1 ~ r~, t,~ . ~ . - ~,~i+ i ~ ~y'
~ ~ ` a ~ ~ M~ F ^ ; -
~ ~ , ~ l _IF -
I `~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ t . • '
~ , ~
~ t ~ • ~ t ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ - _ -
~ ~ ~ . Q I t /
~ ~ . , ' f ~ 4 °'1 ~ , , ~ ~1 ~ ,
~.~s ~ ; ~ ~ , ~ f
~ ~ r ' ~ ~ ] ~ ~ ~ . 1 r~ r i'~►'~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' rf :i~~9 . ~
• ~ R+~~ ~ ` ~ ~ ,~t i
~ / ~ ~ ~ y1 . • , - ~4+ , ~ r _ ~ ~ ~
a/ 4
, y#~ ' y ~ a II 1~ • ~ ~~A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 r _ •
~ ~ ~ r ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ w . ~ } ~ ~ 1 a i .
- ~ ~ ~ ~ • - ~ THIRD,AVENUE .
~ r t , ~ . . ~ ~
~ ` s ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ - f, . ~,4 . ~ ~
~ ~ ; ~ ,
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ t _ ,I~ ~""'*r.,,,, ~
' ~ i~ ~ '"'"~""'"»~r ~ _ . ~ ~ ,
t ' ~ • r*i r# ~ , ~_~,~y~
~ r ( ~ lper'_ ' ~r ~ ~ i ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ I ~r ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A
~I . ~ ~ 1 t ~ . . , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ c , ~ ~
~ ~ ~ , ~ . ..r-~`' ~ / ~ 4 . ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ r ~
~ ~ ~F' ' ~ • ~ ~ . ~ ~
l y~ *
~ , . .
~ . .
. ~ .
- , ,
~
r ;
~ R •
~
y
~
J _ ~
~
~ ~ ~~I ~ 1
~ ~
~ •
~ a ~
♦y~ tF
~ f ~ ' ~ ~1• ~ I _E~
r 'r ~iy,.a.M 1'~'~
J ~1 ! ~ ' Y
. `°r N~.~ ~ ~ ~-~'k' ~ -
t't`~fi~.~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ . . ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ , ~ ,
~ ~ _ t
~ f ~ ~j/~~ ~ ~
~ ~ j M ~(J ~f~ . l V~
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
- . ~ , ,
~ _ ~
r~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ r~
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~r
~ + ~ ~ 1 ~ , ~ ' II ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~i~~ ~ ' ~ yyi ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1
~y. ~ ~ } s~ ~ ~ ` ).l W ~
~ ~ ~ fi * ~~j
~ , , n RJ ~ ■
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~~, ^ ' ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ t~ . ~ ~ J~l r ~ . ~
, ~ I ~ r~~~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ . ~ e " ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 T ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . - ~
~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ .
~ ~
~ , - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,
~ : - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •
~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~4~ ~y ~ ' ~ • -
~ 1 3 ~ ~ . ~
~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~4
~~~1,y], 4 ~ k • ~ ■ j
~ ~ ~ r ' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' , ~ _ ~t ,
1. ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ • ~
.t ~~j r~ ~
~ _ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t~.~++ ~
~ , ~ ~ ~
~ l ~ , ~ - ~ ~ ~y.~
I . ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ~
~ ~r ~ ~ , ' ' r .es+
I ' ' ~ ' ~ .
v~~r,~~ . ~
. -
t ~ ~
~ . ~ . ~
~ _ -
~ ~
~ i
~ ~
~ . I
~ ~ . ~ I
~ ~ . ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ . ,
.
~ ~ " , ' { ~
y
" ~ ~
_ ~ ~ . ' r. ~
. ' ~ , ~
- ' ~ ~ • ~ , , ,a~
~ ~ ~ I . , .'"J 4".~~' t , ~ 6
~ ~ ~ ~ 'V . ,r~'
' ~ ~ ~a■ ' ,,,,i~ ~ I ~ + ' r ` ~
1 , ~ i ~ •
, . . t~ i . ~ ~ b , , ~ 4 ~ ~~Y~{ r
, ~~r. ~ }l~lY' ` . r ~ u , , 4 ~ , • ■ ~ _ , ~ ~•v- ~
t . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~r~ , ~ - .
,.,y . _ _ • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ , ' ~ . ~
r ~ - { ~ ~ I ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ , . ~ 4~'
, ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~y J ~ ! ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . , ~
~F I ~ ' ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ~1+~~ +r ~ - ~ M
. ~ , tl~ ~ , - , . ~ .
i , • ~ ' a r. r..~ i~
' , ! , ~ . ~ ~ ' f. ~ ~ 4 ~ e, ~ ~
, , ~ . _ 1 , , . ' ,
~ e ` ~ . ~ ~ , ~ . , a - ~ " ' i ~ . ~
' ~ ~ a ~ ' M
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l~ rr~'" ' .
~ ~ ~ ~ fi ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ y' ' , • ~ ; -
~ „+r' . - -
r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yl
. ~ ' ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ a ~ ~ .
~ ~ / ~I~t ' M + _ Y
n ~ y . ~ ' y •
. ~ ' , , ' . t _ ~ i ~ ,
L' ■ , ~ 1 1
~ * ~ ~ ~ , . , . ~ *
' - r ~ ~ r + , ~ ~ - f
. . ~ , ' ~ p ~
i . ~ ' R ~ .
~y~ r+i ~ ~ TBIRD A'~NUE
a~/~ • / ' _1. ' , i ~ r .
' ~ ~ • t` r . i ~ , ~ .
1 ~ ~ i * r ~ w ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ y+ • ~ , ~ t ~
y+r+~ ~ . s ~r.~ ~ ~ 1' i ~ f~ ~ ti - . ~ ~ '
. R i+ ~ ~ '"~~'~e 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1
. • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ' ~ ' . ~ , r.r. J
~ . +
y' . ~
~
■ t •
• ~
i ~
~ r ~ 1
A
+ ~ • ~
~ -
~ ~ ~ ~
. ~
r . , 1w„ 4 J
~ . ~ , '
~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ P
4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i i Fi i li
I ~ ~ f I + ~ , ~ i ` ~ u ~
71I ~ ~ ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ t ~ a
' ~ ~ i + ~
~ i Y+~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ y III + ~ ~ 1 1~ ~ I 1
uy ' ~ l ~ 5 . ~ ~ • .
~ ' x + ~j ' ~f
, ` I ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ . ~ ~ y
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~
~ r S i ~ M ~ ~ ~ i i . r ~ ~ ~ . I
~ ~ ~r ; , , ' i _ ~ ~
, ` r , .d ` ~ . ~ ~ ~ , + ~ r!t
„ ~ . I~ „ ~ ~ ~ . W
~ , ~ , . ~ , a ~ _ ~
~ , ti ~ , • .
~ ~ ~i ~
~ ' I ~ i ~ i ~ ~T _
I
~ i ~ , ni~ . ~~t ' i
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P i J , ~ i~
_ ~ ~4 ' r it ~ ~ ~ , , , 3 i I
, ~ , ' ~
~ ~
. . s ~ ' s r
~ y
` , 1 ~ ~
_ + ; ~ , ~
. ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~a . ~.K~ ~ ~ _ + . I
. . ~
7
~ ~ ~ ' i • ~ 1
~ , r , ~ K ~ AVENUF,
- r ~ ~+r ~ ' + ~r,y~r+r ~ ~ r f, , + . ~y
r~ ' r~+r~ ` ~ ~ arr~rrre~n~~ ~ ~ ~
, , ~ ~ V ~ , ~ , ~ ' "r,~
~ ~ ~ i .
, ~ • ' ' ' ~ ~ t ~ . ~ ~
~ , ~ ~
"r` , - ~ , i . '
~ 1 w • ~ ~
~
, : ~ ~ ,
• ~f w:~% f+~tr`Y ♦ •
: lo r Engineermg, Inc. ~ .
~ .
Tay . r Civ11 Design and Land PlanrUrlg.,
AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS
F4R
UNPVERSITY CITY SHOPPING MALL EXPANSION
Prepared June 7, 1989 By: Jamea Borgan.
Taylor Engineering, Inc. '
W. 106 Mission, Suite 206
Spokane, Washington 99201
(509) 328-3371
.
Z E 18 89
. .
Z E 50 A87
V E 38 89
. W. 106 Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 0 (509) 328-3371
• .
.
89-012C: Air Quality
June 7, 1989
Statement of Purpose / Summary
. The purpose of this report is to summarize the estimated air
quality impacts of the proposed expansion of the University City Mall by
W irive st De ve I n pmerr t. The proposed development is located on the
southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and University Road in Spokane's
"Central Valley"; Figure 1 shows its location as well as 1987 "average
weekday traff ic" (AWDT)]-/. Sprague Avenue is one of Spokane County's
"primary (east/west) arterials" within the Valley.
Based on the historical data pertaining to air quality and the
results of a separate traff ic study?j , and the results of standard air
quality analysis procedures, it was concluded.there is little likelihood
the proposed developed will create violations of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards.
F(GURE . NO I
• . t
5983 652 810 4 931
~ 14 13 13419 s .4\ Broedwa Av 472
~ ~
109d 003 8~9 873 -77 4 C
7 313 5 58 ~ - . 9~3 a 69 o°
. ° 71 90
c
9 2 9~ 31 22 ~59 4 "00! 33641 23963 Q ' 706 2a
1 0l S SpreOus Avs
4 s 1g~ 2 13548 28367 j~861 p 26310 bb
5 2 UNIVEktS17Y C Y
573 1547 4C~ ~ve ` ~15 ~ ~406 ~64 S
4th Ave
~ ' • ~
1773 2107 ^ 2700
1888
lb 37 9 1855 190~ ~ 2 62
8 Ave V
~
49 8556 ~
o ~
y
~
3.J Source: Spokane County Engineering Department.
21 UN7VERSITY CITY HRLL: TRAFFIC I19PACT STUDY (ENTRANCO Engineers,
Inc.; June, 1989).
. TAYLOR FNGINEERING
' University City Mall
Page 1
.
Spokane contains designated "non-attainment" areas for both carbon
monoxide and total suspended particulates (TSP). TSP concentrations is
predominantly associated with non-transportation related sources, and it
is considered unlikely the proposed expansion of University City will
have any adverse effects. ,
The non-attainment area for carbon monoxide does-not extend to the
Spokane-Valley. Spokane has historically violated only National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 9 ppm for the "8-hour average carbon
monoxide concentration". The NAAQS for CO allows only one eight hour
average per year to exceed 9 ppm.
. The Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA)
maintained a continuous monitoring station in the Spokane Valley at the
Valley Fire Station on the northwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Balfour Road (directly across from University City) for several years
but discontinued its use due to the low concentrations of C0. From 1981
to 1986, concentrations recorded at the fire station exceeded the S-hour
standard no more than once a year; consequently, no violations occurred.
The following provides a summary of historical maximum concentrations
and the estimates developed for 1989 and 1991 with the proposed
expansion of the University Cit'y Mall.
VALLEY FIRE STATION
"Exceedances" of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for'Average 8-Hour Concentration of Carbon Monoxide
; Max No. > Violations
YEAR ; Conc NAAQS of NAAQS
~
1981 ; 11.40 1 0 ,
1982 ; 10.00 1 0
1984 ; 11.00 1 0
1985 ; 10.00 1 0 1985 ; 6.00 0 0
1989 ; 5.61 _ 0 0 (estimate)
1991 ; 7.15 0 0 (estimate w/
0-City expansion)
Carbon monoxide is produced primarily by automotive emissions. Of
the numerous variables associated with emissions the three of greatest
importance in relatio;: to the proposed development are:
(1) Traffic volumes;
(2) The year to be estimated; and,
(3) Average operating speeds.
Based on the reduction of vehicles without emission controls as time
passes, it is anticipated th-e reduction in emission rates- will offset
the effects of changes in the other two variables.
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 2
.
Methodology The estimated concentrations of carbon monoxide used two standard
computerized proced'ures: (1) MOBILE3 is used to estimate vehicular emission rates;
and,
, (2) CALINE3, a"dispersion model for predicting air pollutant
levels near highways and arterial streets".
The basic steps in completing the estimates were as follows:
STEP 1: Definition of Impact Area
The air quality "impact area" selected was based on the
location of the rnonitoring station and the arterial system most
impacted by the proposed- development (see Figure 2).
FI GURE N0. 2
. . . . • _ i
Main ;
VALLEY FIRE STATION
~
0
. o . o
i rn ~ :
q I~ ~ w. ~ P .
n Y ad r~
~ ~ ..._t4 -*--A F,r. Sprague'r
r } ---r , ~ j, s~
r t Y
Y Y
~ University Y .
City ~Y
t '
Y ~ I
~ ~ t lecond Avenue
: ~ ~
Y
~ .
r • r .
. ,y ~ .
i•
- TAYLaR ENGINEERING'
University City Mall
Page 3
;STEP 2: Development of Required Input Variables
MOBILE3 requires inputs such as average vehicle' speeds,
vehicle ages, distribution of vehicle-miles-traveled by type 'of
vehicle, inspection/maintenance program parametersV, vehicle
."phase" parameters, etc. CALINE3 requires inputs pertaining to
meteorological conditions (e.g., ambient air temperatures,
"stablity claES", etc.), roadway design and geometrics, traffic
volumes, etc. As indicated previously, the three most critical to
the variance in estimates are traffic volumes, average speeds, and
the year for which the proJections are being made (the remaining
variables are either fairly stable, related to the year beign
estimated, or are estimated for "worst case conditions").
STEP 3. "Calibrate" MOBILE3
The procedures are executed for known conditions to assure the
models and inputs produce reasonable results. Since the 8 hour
carbon monoxide standard is most critical to Spokane, a method of
correlating one hour concentrations (the output of CALINE3) with
. 8 hour concentrations is needed.
The year 1985 was selected as the base year; PM peak hour
traffic conditions were used as the "worst case". To estimate PM
peak hour traffic volumes, historical trends in traffic growth from
1958 to 1987 on arterials in the vicinity of University City were
used to estimate average annual growth rates (Attachment # 1
contains statistical summaries of the analyses). Procedures
contained in NCHRP Report 187 were used to develop estimates of
average speeds.
The procedures resulted in an estimated one hour CO
concentration of 12.3 ppm. The observed maximum one hour
concentration in 1985 was 12 ppm (December 17, 1985); the maximum
8 hour concentration was 10 ppm. It was assumed'if the one hour
concentration did not exceed 12 ppm, one or less exceedences would
occur, and no violations would occur.
STEP 4. Estimate Emission Rates
Emission rates were estimated using MOBILE3 and the parameters
developed in Step 2. Estimated speeds were developed' based on
procedures contained in NCHRP Report 187; f igures on the following
page depict results for 1980 through 1991 and for speeds between 5
and 25 mph. Estimates were made for 1985 (the "base" year), 1989
(the current year), and 1991.
. ~ It should be noted the Washington State Department of Ecology is
intending to increase the stringency requirements of the State's
mandatory inspection/maintenance program later this year; the
effects of increased stringency will reduce emission rates even
more than anticipated by the MOBILE3 parameters ueed for this
analysis. TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 4
ESi1HATED CARHON MONQXIDt EDdtSSION RATES ESTIMATED CAR80N MONOXIDE EldiSSlON RATES
- Avsrajs Yehkla Spceda 7ear neo i .
. -o-e s~ - a w► ts .ye Lo oN ~+-=s ~ 4oooo r-~ai ~ uo-.-j~~ ~oes -iow u~w aoo~oo
. . ~
` ; ~06Gp d ~
~ ~ '
v ? lOOaO ` `
soaoo
~ . e ~ ♦
A ~
.
100D0 ~ . 8 • • . S ~ , ~ ~ .8 1
• • ~ ti
\ ~ • •
~r~ s y •O
~ • , ~ ' m
LO?~ 1000 t0E3 19C0 190i r 5a f0d laD t00 =S0 ~QA
Ysu , A~rsrate V4~►leJa 59esds (ln myL)
STEP 5 Estimate Carbon Monoxide Concentrations
CALINE3 was used with the estimates of PM peak hour traffic volumes
(see Attachment # 2) produced by ENTRANCO. CALINE3 requires total
volumes. The results, and selected parameters, are summarized on
page 2. ,
- TAYLOR ENGINEERING
University City Mall
Page 5
ATTATCHMENr
UNIYBRSITY AND SPRAGUF: TRAFFIC GROWTH RBGRESSION ANALYSES :
- Bxponential Trend Line Analysis of EaBt Leg Traffic
. I
10.1+ * * *
I •
Y
' I
. I . ~ *
Z '
10.0+ . I *
I * .
I •
I
I .
9.9+ * .
I
I .
. I .
. I . '
. I • . *
9.7+ *
I . *
I. .
, I ' .
I . * •
I •
9.6+ * .
I . *
I .
Y ~ "
I ~
I . ~ •
9.4+ .
. I -
I .
I * -
I . ~ ' .
9.3+ ~
. •I . '
59.3 63.9 68,4 73.0 77.6 82.1 86.7
Date (in 'decimal' Yorm)
Mean of X=?0.04 Correlation coePficient = 0.954 Yalid cases = 27
S.D. of X=?.39 Degrees of freedom = 25 Miesing caaea = 0
Mean of Y= 9.67 Slope of regreasion line = 0.036 Responae % = 100
S.D. of Y= 0.28 Y intercept =?.130
Regression equation : Y' = 0.036 X+ 7,130
Standard error of estimate for regreselon = 0.084
Standard error oY correlation coefYicient = 0.196
Significance of correlation coefPlcient = 0.000
. ATTAZCHMENT `o1„
UNIVBRSITY AND SPRAGUB: TRAFFIC GROWTH REGRESSION ANALYSES :
Bxponential Trend Line Analysis of East Leg T'raffic
I
10.1+ * * *
I .
I
I . * *
I ..10.0+ , I *
I * .
I ,
I
I .
• 9.9+
I
I .
I .
I . .
. I • . *
9.7+ . ~
. I . *
I. . I ` . . .
I •
9.6+
I . *
I .
I * I *
I . * - .
9.4+ .
I ' .
I *
I . *
9.3+ „ * .
..I .
59.3 63.9 68.4 73.0 77.6 82.1 86.7
' Date (in 'decimal' form)
. Mean of X=?0.04 Correlation coefficient = 0.954 Yalid caseg = 27
.
S.D. of X= 7.39 Degrees oY freedom = 25 Mieeing cases = 0
Mean of Y= 9.67 Slope of regression line = 0.036 ReBponae % = 100
S.D. of Y= 0.28 Y intercept =?.130
RegreBSion equation : Y' - 0.036 X+?.130
Standard error of eetimate for regression = 0.084
Standard error oY correlation coefficient = 0.186
Significance of correlation coefYicient = 0.000
UNtYEKSITY AND SPRAGUE: TRAFFIC GROWTH REGRESSION ANALYSES
Exponential Trend Line Analyeis of South Leg TraPfic
I * .
9.4+ •
I .
I
I •
I *
I •
9.2+ *
I *
I •
I * I * * * I •
.9.0+ • •
I •
. I •
I
z . * *
8.7+
I
. I ,
Y . *
~ . * . .
I .
S.a+ *
• I
I
I I
I . •
8.3♦ .
I * .
I . •
I *
I
I * .
8.0+
. I
-------+---------+---------+---------+---------t--
60.4 64.8 69.2 73.5 77.9 82.3 86.7.
- Date (in 'decimal' Porm)
Mean of X= 70.56 Correlation coefficient = 0.931 Yalid casea = 24
S.D. of X= 6.83 Degrees of freedom = 22 MigeinB caees = 0
Mean of Y= 8.69 Slope of regresefon line = 0.054 Responee X = 100
S.D. of Y= 0.40 Y intercept = 4.855
Regreesion equation : Y' = 0.054 X+ 4.855
Standard error of eatimate Yor regreBaion = 0.145
• Standard error ot correlation coeff icient = 0.209
SiBnif icance of correlation coefficient = 0.000
i
UNIVBRSITY AND SPRAGUB: TRAFFIC GROWTH REGRfiSSION ANALYSES
gxponential Trend Line Analygig of Weat Leg Traffic
I
10.1+
Z * -
I * *
I • *
I -
I •
10.0+ ' • •
I .
I , .
I . * . .
I • .
I *
9.9+ • * •
I ' . I •
I .
I •
I • ~ .
9.8+ . *
, I .
I •
I ' . *
I *
I • .
• 9.6+
I * *
z .
I * ,
I .
I * ' '
8.5+ * .
I * • * .
I
I .
I * -
8.4+ * ' . .
I
59.3 63.9 68.4 73.0 77.6' 82.1 86.7
Date (in 'decimal' form)
Mean of X= 69.67 Correlation coefYicient = 0.928 Yalid caBes = 28
S.D. of X=?.51 Degrees oY freedvm = 26 MiBaing casee = 0
Mean of Y= 9.70 Slope of regression line = 0.028 Response X = 100
S:D. of Y= 0.23 Y intercept =?.721 -
Regreasion equation : Y' = 0.028 X+ 7.721 '
Standard error of eatimate Eor re8ression = 0.085 ' -
Standard error oP correlation coefYicient = 0.192
Significance of correlation coefficient = 0.000 .
r
HERALY} ROAD AND SPRAGUh : TRAFFIC fiROWTH REGR$SSION ANALYSES
Expcnentkal Trend Lirte Analysis of North Leg Traffic
1
6.J+ ~
I Y
I -
Y
B .7+ -
Y
~ . .
X
~
I ~
, 6.5+
. ~ • ' ~
I
I .
I
~ . ~
6.4+ , * , I ~ ~
I .
~ -
I
~ . ~
6 . 2+ ~ ~k . . . ~
I *
I .
~ '
I
~ .
6.0+
~ -
~ I *
. f
~ - •
5,9+
5$.8 83.4 66.0 72,7 77.3 8210 86.6
Date (in 'decima,l' fc+rm).
Mean of X~ 72.89 Correlation coeffi.cient _0.730 Vallrl caaes = 16
S.D. flf X =7.63 Degrees af freedom =14 Miaaing cases = U
Mean of Y = 6.32 Slope of regxession-line 0.022 Reapanse 100
S.D. of Y i0.23 Yintercept =4.748
@egres$ion equatian : Y' = 0 _ (]22 X f 4.748
Standard error af eatimat~ for regression = 0.154
Standard error o£ oorrelation coeff icS.ent = 0.258
Signi.ficance of +N-orrelatian, coefficient = 0.402 -
r .
UNIVfiRSITY AND; SPRAGU$: TRAFFIC GROWTH REGRfiSSION ANALYSfiS'
• Bxponential Trend Line Analyeis of North Leg Traffic
1 9.1+ *
I
I
I
~ . *
I
8.8+ - _ *
I *
I . '
I ~ *
. I * I . .
8.6+
I * *
I
I . * Z . . I '
8.3+ • *
, I *
I
I ' ' • *
I
I • *
8.0+ *
I . *
I
• I * ,
' I
z •
7.7+ I * * • .
I * *
I
I -
I *
7.5+ * . I • -
58.6 63.4 68.1 72.7 77.4 82.0 86.7
Date (in 'decimal' form)
Mean of X= 69.89 . Correlation coefEicient = 0.859 Valid cagea = 27
S.D. af X= 7.60 Degrees of freedom = 25 Missing caaee = 0
Mean of Y= 8.23 Slope af regression line = 0.050 Response X = 100,
S.D. of Y= 0.45 Y intercept = 4.703
Regression equation : Y' = 0.050 X+ 4.703 Standard error of eatimate Por regression = 0.228
Standard errar of correlation eoefficient = 0.196
SiBnificance of correlation coefficient = 0.000 .
~
. ~ • ' . ATTATC,~II~TT 2 .
. . ~ .
.19a9.Plil P+eqkHaur~ . ~ ~ . .
• Main .
~ .
• o . q ^
. P o m
,0 ot.
D s
_tg 6~OOA ~ 9L0 ~iS W 46-0 aA W 9~oy91AYOG SUragaue-&-'0
~ } In
Y ~ i~
.
r
University
Y 1;~ ~ ~-r► - ~ A
4 ta). C~
~ ~ty .
.~I A . . ~
, ~ --t- ~ Se nd ~Avenue
~ ~
- r
~ ~
~ . . A ~60'
. • 1991 . Prll~ Aeak Haur ~
- ~ . . ~ . . . . ,
. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ' • . .
, Main
~ • .,d o . a 'm
'o
~ saeo'~ n~ ~s
-W •-A .~s~° i,.,_w 4-- ~°--w c~ ~..i~2 z:) Spraeue-G-W
Y Y
University ~
Y t...~.
~ 1 City . .~Y
Second Avenue
A 30.
. ; ~
~
• •
or Eil
5 lneerln Inc.
9
Civil Design and Land Planning
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
FOR
UNIVERSITY CITY BHQPPING MALL EXPANSION
Prepared Jwae 7, 1989 _ By: Mark Aroneon
Taylor Engineering, Inc. : .
. W. 106 MiasYOn, Suite 206
. Spokane. WaBhington 99201
(609)328-3371
~
,
ZE 1 8 89
. o
. -1 x
U
. : •
38'
89
. W. 106 Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 •(509) 328-3371
i
~
~ .
This dra.inage analysis is intended as a supplement to the environm.ental checklist.
A detailed drainage pla.n and drainage report with hydraulic calculations, in
conformance with Spokane County's Guidelines for Stormwater Management, will
be submitted for Spokane County review prior to project design completion. The
following Para aPhs identify a brief description of the intended site drainage arid
the procedures that will be used to accomplish the required analysis.
All stormwater precipitation originating on this project and all stormwater run-off
naturally draining to his project will be collected and diverted to on site 208 drainage
percolation areas with drywells. These percolation areas and drywells will be sized
to handle precipitation and run-off in accordance with the Spokane County
Guidelines for Stormwater Management. .
The attached plan shows the project site. Prelixninary storm drainage basins are
outlined on the plan as well as demolition areas and structural areas which will
remain. The shaded areas (existing Frederick and Nelson, west portion of the mall,
JC Penney, and Newberrys) will require minor structural modif'ication but the
impermeable area of this shaded area will remain the same. Therefore; we propose
to elim.inate this area from our 208 calculations.
We anticipate roof drainage from the buildings (central mall area, majors, and
parking garages) will be by interior piping to a buried storm sewer piping system.
This piping system would be approximately 5 to 6 feet deep to avoid freezing. We
anticipate the roof drainage from Area "A" as shown on the plan would be to the
south grass swale. This swale would likely have some retaining walls.
Area "B" consists of some parking and the east parking structure. This area would
be drained by overland flow and i.nterior roof piping to the swale along University
R,oad.
Area "C" would drain ground level parking by overland flow, north to landscaped
grass swales along Sprague Avenue. Area C construction will require the removal
of eaListinflor pavement, regrading, and new surfacing. Area "C" may also include roof
dra.inage the northern portion of the expansion if grades and interior pluxnbing
design allow.
Area's "D" and "E" would be by overland flow to the grassed swales. Again new
construction would likely require regrading a.nd surfacing. We anticipate paved
areas to be graded from 1% to 5% slopes.
The methodology used for design will be as outlined in Guidelines for Stormwater
Management published by Spokane County Engineers.
In accordance with Soils Survev, Spokane Countv Washineton, 1968, the soil on this
site is identified and categorized as: -
GgA - Garrison Gravelly loam, classified as gravelly, medium textured,
somewhat excessively drained soils formed in gravelly glacial deposits.
University City Shopping Mall Expansion - Drainage Analysis June 7, 1989
Page 1 .
~ i
;
u- ~
~
See the Soils Map Exhibit "B" on the following pag e. Garrison Gravelly loam
is one of the soils identified in the Guidelines for Stormwater Management as
acceptable for dtywells. The rate of flow is .3 CFS for single depth drywells
and 1.0 CFS for double depth drywells.
R,AINFALL: Data used for design will be in accordance with Fxhibit "C" on the next
page which is an excerpt from the Guidelines for Stormwater Managementl by
Spokane County Engineers. A 10 year return frequency event will be used.
RUN-OFF: Control will be overland flow off the new parking lots and storm piping
system off the roofs into new 208 areas and rywells. Existing roofs (shown as
shaded on the lans) will drain directl to ells withi.n the arkin
p Y ~'3'W p g areas. Grass
percolation areas will be sodded for erosion control.
Grass percolation (208) areas will be sized to accommodate 1/2-inch of run-off from
the new surfaces.
Drywells will be sized to handle the total run-off flow in their respective basins
beyond the storage capacity of 1/2-inch off impervious surfaces. This will be
accomplished by using the Bowstruig method to analyze the run-off. Drywell lids
will be set at an elevation allowing percolation of the first 1/2-inch of run-off prior to
overflowing into the drywell.
Piping, ditching, -and capacities will be verified to insure adequate flow.
The above described system of stormwater control will provide the necessary
quantity and quality controls, as outlined in the Spokane County Stormwater
ManaLrement Guide for this project.
University City Shopping Mall Expansion - Drai.nage Analysis June 7, 1989
Page 2
~
N ~
100 50 Q 1QQ 200
~~A~ FEET
~
0 0
a a ~ O
~ O ~ ~ . 0. }Q C
- . ~ _ ' ^ ~
+ ~ ~ / ~
PRAGUE AVENUf. _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I _ S ~ ,9~ ~ ~ P
- . ~ ~ ~ i ~ / ~w► ~ , /
' l1JA}dS ~ C . ' ~ , i ~ , ` ~ r •~se5.. 9a • . _ LEGEND , "ifF'9~• ~ 'r ' " ~ ~ PAD ti . • s8 , - ~ LECENo
F. ~ 6000 ~ ~ ~ DRA . U ~ t~ , , ORAINAGE BAS1N PERIMITER
~ J ~ 1:~ ~s,. • ~ . ~ ~1 PER ~ tVEW , ~ ~ , . , KiNG 9. ~ ~ ~ ( J , ' RUCNRE m
• ~-r , , ~ ~ 20E ~ ~ . .~~''3 g ~VFLS. ORt ; , _ ` ......-tZ0000,~,F•._. • . ~ / f f •208 S70RM cwel ES
~ ~ " . ' - ' = caR,_,. : ~ j,,,(.. P ~ ~ • , ~ ~_.r'^ ~
, D , ~ . ~oR z ~ y , 120 f:' _ . ` '...~4.-•. BA .7 ~ G ~~..5. i ~ . . ~
- --...,s~- , q ,x:.:.;.,; ':,t;.: ..--ts&9 - . , f11D. ~9 ~ ' . , ~„_J •.f, ';i.;:.j ' . . • ~ G . : i i i r: ' 6Q~ ` --L J • . ; ; r _ _ _
19 , '~9~ '•''^.i: ~ ' . . r~, ~~1... ` e. I ) : ~ ; :r. ~ .t,• c.. .ti:' r' . r.:~f~~;:~:. ~;,•••.•..ti~~;.:i:;~~; . ~ T~ ,if '.1. ~ :•~I~/~.l'~\. 1. w.,•~~~f...
~ ~ ;.~:~~y . . : • ~.~:..,w; s:: '.i~:.:~ . pEMOL iaN ~~'t,`: ~r` ~y. PARKING '•J"PMw7~ •.t ~ '11, "~..:;r~.~~i.,N, :J~i'~ :~'~R.~;•iti ~ I NEW S~:» •~'r REA .iG~~ B i :~t,BQQ . ~r ~ , . A ~ti~: .r
989 I srnucn,Re ~ ~ ~ .~a :iqG~~:sf;::• . ,s r ' ~~~n: • , 5 LEVE ~N~.. :.1~~,ti~+,~4'•~~;. ~ l~~b~f~AN: ~K;;~;~~•.~ I .•1,(F~s~R, , ~
. \ . ~j.~ ~ u:,. • " ~ ,s~c~ ~;::y ~ ~x . ~ ~ ' ~;t:~•..;"~ ; • • - 4 , - u. crtt wESr 4 :3q...,..' (~:r. ~`~~;•'Y ~,:;::,_'a, s#~~ , ~ , ` V ~ - i "BLDG. TO BE .•~ti . ~~,:^~1~~~{5~,~!~ { • . r^~~~ .4•Y~~~~~''1: ~ ~ ~ ~ ,I r.?c~ , . . _ _ :'F~~I~:. S
~ - , ~ ~ ~ ' ~~+ov~o .t~' .}~.,•,i;:.;;;.:.;~.:t~~:t ;;~;~!i ~ , ~1: .x~::~!!~;:... ..J:~::~ ~ ; 5 '•!s ~ ~ ~ :,;;R. :~n; :;~~;~t~1!~'.,:-~,,,
~ Z 91, ~.t:~ `.K.~ ~ ' 'i~;~'~ .sc~ :v't'.. , ' Q . . . *'`,..~~:'i'~;: ~ _ •:i'.~~.~ / ~ . +~,~;:-i~'^i'~'~ ` / . ` . I," , ~ , . 3 , ~ i :~ii. • . ~~.1~ . . ' /9 ~ i ~ r 93. r ' ; , i
. T . , ' - B9-•---.. ~ ^ P.~ 3 ~ ~ ] ` , . . , ; .....i99o--.-_.-•..",• , , 1 r •~~i~ r.- .
ood3 . , E - . . .,~or. - , , . .1992^-....... • . .qy , • . ~ r• . . t. ~ , T~ r-- n , - 600 ;iy~?••-. , " t-- 'i ~ ~ ; . " , '1
~ . ~ , ' • i r_ , ~~99).~6.~ 1495.--... 'C` ' ~ Pfa^"11~~ .7 ' W/y :
i - ~ ti. _ _ ; , t1~TURE ' ~ i • -s~iro~o~Tvt~att~ : - - ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ - ~ . . ~ • 'a ~ , ,
•Jg9 .~1;,-:;.. ; ~ ,qa y - ~ 1. , .;i,',' ~ ~ ~ , ~ a ~ ~ ~ r, r, ~ ~ ~ . ~ • ` i i , ~
. . / `1Y • c~, ~ ~ ~ _ i ` , 1 . i / J ~
. 1` , ''1,~• ` i I . ~ , . _ `c'pa1. ° " ~ •d988•- .
~i,i - ~ ..1984~.---...._ ••r• , ~ ' ' ~ ' ~~`'1998~= K ~ ` r i . - - } ~
~ 'ig91..... . t • . ~ N ~µ1 . • - . _ , • ..1 , Z i
99J., Z , ~~99e. 7
. . ,~l99y„ ' ° y9 996 . . ~B,ti.
..~9 . , I .
)RAINAGE PLA
~ ' ION5 ~ ~ REVIS , 0 ~ T~,ylor Engiaee~nng ,
~ .
' ~ GE P' ~ , . , SI7E ORAINA
' DATE; APP: • D~: pA~: APP: .
, CK D: .
r
_ t
1 ~ l
ci- .ti ~ ec,,
~
r
.
v"J, c
~A I ~
e ~ °YT
O- . Ic ~~c 4.~ft CL ci~ f4 Letk~-,
,
b C u s~ 1 'F v` ~Q ~J ~ ~ ~ 'Q• US'e
. 1 `
Q C{ y 5 ~ 1 I -5 ~ A. r2..
~(ch.Lk ts'n-) ch v^'
~ x 7 ~ ~ ~i v`'~ ~ ~ ~ l.~v! ~ ' • • ~~J~ /
1-1-V12, l4-^L-I-iLWti Lc ~'b1 I 'L C_..IGr2,. ~ ~s
l . .
. ^
L ~~C•L~ ~ ~~/f/~.L,`-rC.-~,.~
. ~
'VL<' V uuQ ,'Y
~ ~ ! l
~
~ •
~
. ~ .
U.-
J c 5 4~ ~~~c.
p ~
(Jl I
~
r 1 v ~ , 7 • ~ ~~t. C ~ ~ G ~ ' :"z
~ ~ ~
~
. " _ r-
_ .
.
.r--
. ~
•
" r
J-0
. .
-
~
. r . _
- - ~ ~
_
. ~=.s
~
_
_
- - '
467 ✓
' / A1C,7
~
~ ~rJ ~ •
, o
T~ ca
67
` .
~ '
.00
-2
~ ► -
r ~
~
41A
/O~rz
0A
• ~f ~ ~ ~1~/ ~
~
r-. ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ " r~ ~ • /7.~
y
~ -2P . ~ 14
✓ ~ r~ ~ > t-~
.r~' j kv
. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J~~
, . • f _ ~
.26
7'~ • ~ u
`02
• f-, l/w4/ ~ .
zr
XZ
911"
2
~ ~111 ~
7
~ -
r --"Mmlqpr- I
12 jCoo;' oooeJ 5~07,,,4~
~ / - r ~ . •'"~r ~
00/
~-e-,~
;
~
, OIP~
Ps
. 3
~
.s.. - ~ •
r • ~
~ a . . . ` V .
S
T~' ' ' • . . -
~ f t
- ~ ~ H ~ . .
' ~ , ` . . .
!
~
• ~ A ~
~ ~ ' . ~ ~ . . ^~_~._.~r~~". - . _ _
~
_ ..~.--t! `
I ' _ , _ _ ~ .
k . .
3 -
- - ~ .
SPOKANE ENVIRONMFNTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-1 t-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
FILE NO(S): ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87, VE-38-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone reclassification from Commercial (C) and Multiple
Family Suburban (MFS) to Regional Business (B-3); a change of prior conditions of approval
to allow savctures to be located on ground previously lirnited to parldng lot(s); and a vanance to
allow fewer pazking spaces than required by zoning regulations all associated vvith a major
expansion/remodeluig of University Shoppuig Center from a community shopping center to a
regional shopping center.
PROPONENT: Winvest Development Co. c% Stanley Schultz
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY:
Generally located south of Sprague Avenue between Walnut and University Roads, in the
Spokane Valley in the N 1/2 of Section 20, Township 25 N, Range 44, EWM, Spokane
County, Washington; University City Shopping Center.
I.FAD ACENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency for this proposal has detennined that it does not have a probable significant ,
adverse impact on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is = required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead .
agency. This inforination is available to the public on request.
This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this
NIDNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., August 22nd, 1989, if they are
intended to alter the MDNS.
MITICATING MEASURES:
I acknowledge and agree to all the mitigating measures per the aua,ched memorandum dated June
21, 1989 (from the office of the County Engineer) to the modifications and adjustments to the
above described proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures
in the future.
Dae : r 21 41 t Name: Stanlev Schultz. Attornev for Winve~
D tv 1Qpm~ Cam~ -
~nat ~
~
Responsible, Offi i• by Thomas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
Posiaon/Title: Spokane County Senior Plannql Phone: (509) 456-2205
Addrui; NJ21 lefferson SLSpokane• WA 99260
Comments regarding environmental ce s wel o e t the g.
Date Issued: Ju1y 25 19$_9 Si n •
*
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after i be omes final, may be made to Spokane
County Planning Deparanent, at N. 721 Jefferson S pokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after
the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objectiong.
Contact the Planning Deparanent for assistance with the specifics of a SE3PA appeal,
A copy of the MDNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology(Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Transportarion(Olympia)
3. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
4. Spokane County Health District
5. Spokane County Sheriffs Office
6. Spokane County Build.ing & Safety
7. S okane CounmVtilitj~ 8 . 'Sp
+a~ane,Cawnty Eagimed,
9. ann g anager-City of Spokane
10. Fire District No. 1
11. Modern Electric Water Company
12. Valley Garbage Service. ,
~
.
OFFICF OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOk'ANE COUNTYl, WASHINGTON
June 21, 1989
To: Spo'kane County Planning Department (Current Pl-anning
Administrator)
From- - - ~ ~
. Sp~kane C~unty Engineer s Department
;
~ Sub jec.t: Conditions of Approval Zone,Chanqe No: ZE 18-89
Appl i cants Name Win.vest Develbpmen't Co
Se c t ion, 20, Townsh i p 25 N. Range 44 EWM,
re.: Zoninq
The followinq Mitiqa,ting Measures are submitted for inclusion in a
Miti.gated Dete_rmination of Non Siqnificance (MDNS) for the above
referenced zone change proposal. These mitigating measur.es are
necessary t.o mitigate t.raf'fic and other impac.ts di.rectly related to a
project of this magnitude. The requirements presented herein are
based upon trip distribution data provided to the County Engineer'b.y,
the enqineer for the propased development. Authority for the
imposition of these requirements is found within the State
Environmental Policy Act and Board of'County Commissioners Resol_ution
• ' = 80 -1592. ~
.In addition to including these requirements _in the MDNS, we reques:t
that, they be p'resented in the Planning Report to.the County Hearing
Fxaminer Committee. They sh-ould be made Conditions of Approval,
sh*ould the pro-posal.be approved by the Committee at the public
hearing scheduled July 200 1989.
' Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as
proposeds -
1. Applicant shall petition the Board of Count.y Commissioners for
the vacati.on of Dartmouth Road from Sprague to the Milwaukee
Rc►ad_ R. O. W.
2. App'l i cant shal1 dedi cate right of way a long Universi-ty Road
consistent witl-i the- plan view of the alignment which is attactied
and made a part of the recor-d. The r-ight of w.ay dedicatian is
as fo1 l,aw.s:
1. A 2E' x 24' triangle at the n-drthwest carner o.f #2,
2. 39' from the exist-ing 'R.O.W. for 186' sauth of #'i,
3. A transition f rom 39' to 271"f rom the 'existinq R. 0'. W.
for 266' -soutt-i of #21
4. :27' f rom tfre existing R. 0. W. for 140. 6' south of #3,
5. A 27' x 271 triangle.at the so~ut.hwest car'ner of #4
. .
ZE 18=89 page 2
6. Access pe'rmits for approa.ches to t.li.e Cc~unty Road System shall be
abta,i,ned frc+m the County .Engineer..
7. Applicant shall i,mprove- Univer-sity Road west uf the "sec'tion
line, fram Sp.ra.que Ave. t.o their south property line in
accordance .wit,h the approved typical crvss section(s) ,on file
wit.h the County Enqineer 's Office. The plan view of this
al ignmen't is at-tached and made a part of the record..
G. Appli cant sha.l l improve the Sprague Ave: - University Road
intersection as necessaryo including upqrading or replacing-the'
-ex,isting signal system, to conform to the required improvements
ta University Road south of Sprague Ave.
9. Applica'nt shall c.onstruct a seco.nd w.est boundleft turn lane on
Sprague Ave. at Univ.ersity Road as re.commended in the traffic-
impact study.
iQ. Appl.icant shall construct a free, right 'turn lane on Uni.versity
Road., Sout:h of Sprague Ave., as recommended in the traffic
impa•c t study. - s► q~~ sys~e..s
Z' ~e.ei~-~~ jf-Js~o.~ ~i•c C~ ~b aove~4w
rm. d~s+o19
` a~.l~ro~vdz.-~:.br.ays~ 1c'oa~r~Jy V- 4io.e~ o'vti-~~.wt• ~►~6.t-
1l.. Applican.t sKall construc't a new signal -system at 4th Aveo on
University Road, as re'commended in the traffic impact study.
12. Applicant shall construct channelization modifications on
Sprague Ave. as "recommended in the final approved traffic
circulation and pa.rk,ing plan.
13. •Applica'nt shall relocate or reconstruct the existing Felts Road
traffic signal _on Sprague Ave.. as -recommended i.n the final
approved traffic c-ircula-tion and parking plan.
14-. App.l i cant shal l submi t. f:or appr,oval by the Spokane County
Engineer ro4d, drainage and access plans f.or t.he, required
improvements.
15. The appl i cant shal l submit for approval by the Spoka►ne -County
Engineer and the Spokane Count.y ~Health Dis'trict a detailed
combined on-si te sewage system plan and -surface water d,isposal
plan' far the ent,ir.e project or port.ion t'fieret-f if the
development is p,hased.
lE. A par'king plan and traffic circulati,on plan shall be submitted
and appro_ved by the •Spokane County Engineer. The desi.gn,
location and a"rrangement of parking stalls shall be'in
accordance with standard en,gineer'ing practices. Pa.ving or
surfacin,q as approved by the County Engineer will be required
for any p.ortion of the project. wh.ich is to be occupied or
traveled b.y vehicles
r
ZE 18=89 page 3
1 , 7. The const'ructian of the roadway imp,ravements stated herein s,hall
be accompl'ished as app,roved by the Spokane County Engineer.
18. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the cur-rent State of
Washingt.on Standard Specifications for Road and B'ridge
J canstruction and other applicable county -standa-rds and/or
adopted resolutions pertainin,g pertaining to Raad Standard's and
Stormwat.er Manageme,nt i,n effe•c.t at the date of construction,
unles.s otherwis.e' approved by, the County Engineer.
19. Ac:cess to, t'he farmer' Mi lwaukee Road RiQfit af Wav shal l. be
prohibited; both fram t'he site and from Walnut Road.
20, Roadway standards, t.ypical roadway sect.ions and drainage plan
-requirements ar-e found i,n Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resol'ution 80-1592 as amended and are app'licable to this
proposal..
25. A11. requ.ired constru,ction eithin the existing or proposed public
right of way is to be completed pr-io,r to the release of a
b.uilding permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
, Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall
be filed with the Count*y Engineer.
r}~ V
. . i . ~
. ; ~ , • ~ . ` ~
~ i j, ~ ; ; ~ I ; ' !
! ~ ~ G._.._..._ . „L;,~ z!~~4. a`~ . __✓~•,..1. ' . ~
. } ; ~ ` , II I N A.
r
~ ~ ~ • ~ I ! ~iv 0,7~ ~,V ~
. . . . . • . ~ i r ..nrl~rwr~~wr~M~ww~*~~ww~~~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ t..., .
'r• ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' 1S~ I 1 ~ ~ ~
I '
, . S . ;
,
' • ~ ~ i i ' , ~
~ ~ ~ , , ' ` i~ I~ ~ ~ ~
" u 1 ~ j 1~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i • i ' i ~
~ • • ( . . ~
I. • ; ; i ~ ~ . ! ~
, . ; ~ . .
,
. „ ;
~ ; .
, j ~ ~
. t
j ~ -
~ ~ . . . . . . _ . f .,t ~ .
3o01tA1IC COYNTV GOYA1 NOY/C
DATEo 117
TO a
FROMa
~ . ~AG~~ ~~LLOW o
s~~~~~ANE ''COUNTY ~~~~~~~~T
NoRTH 721 JEFFERSOx, s~~ET
sPoKANE, WA 99260
PxoNE (509) 456-2205
FAx (569) 456-2243
REV..5/89:FCU
~
3-
. , • . P
' or,
.~~~me-
, , -
. i l
f
- PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROAOW`AY CENTRE BUILO,ING N. 721 JEFFEti50N:STREET
PHONE '456-2205
•.t?~ - -:K• SPOKANE, WA-SMINGTON 99260,
`,r.. •;:1: .
SPOKANC COUNT-r CpURT MOUSE
TO: StSD SChL11tZ
Attorney for Winvest Developmea~t Com any
% Judy Wood -
(FAX Telephone: 838-141
FROIVI: Thomas G. Mosher, AI
Senior Planner ,
DATE: J.uly 17,1989 ~
S,UBJECT: Acxompan.ying; MIDNS for University City Shopping. Cente,r
Please have W. Schultz sign the accompanying document under the tide "Midgating.
IVieasures." Hopefully, we will have discussed'this, before it reaches his desk. Please FAX a
sigaed version back to us,. attention Jan Penney. Additionally., please -follow that-FAX'd
version with the.original_-signed docuaQent
Thanks far your cooperation.
tw.
IlVIIVIEDIATE ATTENTION***IlVIIVEDIAIEATTENTION***IMMEDIATE AT~ON
.a
, UrtIVEItSI'I'Y CITY
PROJECT 'RE~VIEW
AGENDA
February. 1,990 1. Project Phasing
2. Traffic/Ro.ad_ Improvements
a. What is ,status of road improvetnents addressed in contract
rezone document? .
b. How do we. bond~ required -work t6at won't be 'complete prior to
building permit issuance?
c. Other Issues
3. Approval Process
a. Pre-Construction Phase
oHow does SpokaAe County handle coordiaatioa with Winvest?
Do we have a dedicated contact- person?.
-What steps -required to reach site plan approval?
oWhaf parking issues are yet to be resolved?
oUfitity issues
,oEnvironmental ' issues
-Other concerns
b. Permitting Phase
oWhat is' required to secure demo permits? How long?
•What is required to secure grading and utility permits7 Row
long?
•What is required to 'secure buildi.ng permits? How long?
•Do you allow fast uackiag permit process?
c. Construction Phase
oWhat testing and inspection do y.ou ~require?
•What inspections -does, the Count.y perform?
•What is -the process =for changes to approved plans after
construction has commenced?
4. Utilities
a. E°lectrical
•What's required for relocation of existing primary pow.er :
liaes? b. Water
oWhat does the City require for fire protection?
eAre cber+e aay fire. flow fees required. to, be paid?
c'.. Sanitary Seaer
d. Other Issues
~
~ C4-.,~ raylor E~ ~eerm , Itic,
Civil Design and Land Planning
1 i .
UIVIVTliBIZ'Y CITY'EXPANSION '
Pli.jELIMINARY MEETINGr ; F~~B 11 6 1990
WITH,BPORANE COUNTY
, Couaty Planning Departffieat ~.`oufeteuce ~oom.
Febraa~-9. ~1990
MINUTE9
Attendeee:
'Steve fforobiowski - County Planning (609) 466-2205
Gary Kennaly - County,Engineers (509) 456-3600
. Gary Nelson - County EngRneers (609) 456-3600
Bob. NlcCann - County En ' eers. (509) 466-3600
Ken Jeffrey - Dept. of B, ' di.ng & Safety. ('609) 456-3675
Tom,Davis; - Dept, of Builciing &~Safety (509)' 4b6-367b
Daryl Way - Health District (609) 456-6040
Frank Ide.,- Taylor Engineering, Inc. (b09),328-3371
Steven ~Iasson - County, .Commissioner Cb09) _4b6-2265
Mark Aronson - Taylor Epgu' -~eering, -Iiac. (509).328-3371
Stan Schultz - VVinston & Cashatt (509)-, 838-6131_
David Bolin - Winvest Development (206) 223-9419
Alan VVinningham - Vinvest Development (206) 223-9419 -
.Mike '`I'aylor 'Tay.lor 'Engineer'ing, Inc. (509) 328-3371
Wally Hubbard - County Planur-ing (509) 456.4205
Stan Schultz i.ntroduced Alan Winriingham arid,David Bolin and presented an update
on U-City's status. - -
Alan Winningham considered this meeting. a"Pre." Preapplication Conference and
stated he .was working with various tenants and, tenant options. He anticipates
making a public announcement -within 3-4. weeks regarding tenant options.
Nir-. Winniagham presented these development,phasing concepts:
Phase I - Demolition
Phase II -.Begin construct'ion of easterly portion to two floors; some tenant
rearrangemen.t
Phase .III - Construct parking s.tructures in rear
Phase IV -Construct iiew 'majors aad: parking structure
A. more deGnitive site plan will be presented at the next, meeting.
W. -106 M1sslon, Ave: A Sp'okane. WA 99201 0(509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-8224•
"t
~
University City _Fxpansion
Minutes - Page 2
Steve Horobiowski welcomed Winvest .Development to Spokane and reviewed the
zonirig hearing, h.istory and Findings and Order. The Planning Dept: will play the
lead role after the hsaring. Each agency deals with their elements with Planning
being -the "umbrella" agency. lPar-king is a significant concern. Dept: of Building &
Safety coordinates the buil __ding permit process. They will be the, agency to, resolye
construction conIIicts.
Approval Process-. - Tom Davis explained the functioa of the Pre-Application
Conference which will i.nclude keeping ininutes on key issues, contact persons,
names, and phone- numbers.. Builcling & Safety will then work from~ the minutes
:during the approval process. Ken Jeffrey will be the main lead on buil ding pernuts.
Tom Davis gave David Boli.n the handouts. on .Pre: Application Conference `and
Pre-Construdion Qnference. Alan Winningham stated - Winvest .Development
.-o
w.ould make their best efforts to carefully, organize phasing but asked for
- consideration in flexibility as tenant -situations change during renovation and COIIStTLiCtl'OII.
Steve Horobiovvski stated that certain c+onditions are strict and inflexible and others
, are not. NIr. - Horobiowski used . signs and landscaping as an example. Alan =
Winningham said process engaged in to date will clarifp their priorities, and needs as
well. He and Dave. Bolin also said their first, review of Findings and Order show.ed
~ that they were- specific and non-specific es appropriate.
Alan Winningham spoke of tenant footprints- and.,a.sked how much flexibility- vvould
. be -evailable. An exaYnple -was major- tenant expansion and changing -loading dock
locations. Steve Horobiowski explained that the Master Plan document has some
flexibility. Key issues need to be respected. Alaa Winiiingham referred to the
1Vlaster Plan as a"living docwnent". Upon issuence. of specifc building permits,
modiGcations can be made but must go, through the approval process.
Alan Winningham. r-equested a copy of -the as-builts for the,STA Transfer Station.
,
'rwl~~ ~~~enng, Inc.
Civil Design and -Land Planriing
W. 106 Mission Ave. o Spokane. WA 99201 0(5U9) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-8224
~
Universitiy City Expansion Minutes - Page 3
Gary Kennaly : mentioned. that attention would be needed when dealing vvith issues.
s.uch as right-of-way widths, etc. ~in preparing the site mester .plan.
. Daryl : Way, County, Health stated their interest, would not necessarily be ut'_ 'ties.
They, will deal with the specifics upon the request for. building per-mits. -
Winvest I)evelopment will need to coordinate-new and on-going food preparetion
establi'shments with County Health and the. water -purveyor. Mr. Way provided
Dave Bolin with -copies of food purveyor regulations. He expressed the need for
concern about the safety of citizens during the construction pheses:
Alan Winningham asked if there were any further questions concer-ning him which
need to be answered. 'He designated David Boli.n or Mike 'Taylor, to be the. key
contact persons. (in thst order). Vacation of roadways was mentioned, es a concern.
, At that time -Alan Winni.ngham, Stan Schultz, Wally .Hubbard, and 'Steve Hesson left
the: meeting.
Aian Winninghain ment'ioned that. Nir. Harry 1Vlagnuson (current owner) was
. supportive of the- project and:of their.current- activities. - Gary Iienn.aly cautioned that process such as street vacations are fairly tiine
conswming and should be coordinated as -soon es possible. He also wanted to see
where- and how parking endcirculaition would be affected during each phase.
Particular interest needs to ,be paid to handicapped parking regulations.
The nwnber of required -stalls is a Plan.n.i.ng Dept. approval. There was question as
to whether or zot there wo.uld be adequate parking as Phase I is developed and
there is no initial increase in pairking. David. Bolin said he felt that with b
spaces f 1000 -sq. ft. of GLA and R,osauers being vacant, he would be in conformance
with, parking,standards. Steve Horobiowski,said he didn't, know but thought it could
be.
- 7C~r ~~ee-ring, II1C.
, Cixi1.DPSign and Land Planning
W. 106 Mission Ave. o Spokane: WA'99201 01509) 328-3371
. FAX• (509) 328-8224
`r
Q.
University City Fxpansion
Mi.nutes - Page 4
Ken Jeffrey was interested that fire protection be maintained throughout: the
phasing. He wants -to know, if prior to construction they must have operati.ng
hydrants in place? Answer:, Yes
-
Ken Jeffrey explained the Fast Track permitting process' which is not,recognized by
all agencies withi.n, the County. County. Building~ & Safety goes througb, structural
and interior pla.ns page'by page, as submitted. Applicants need to get commitment
. `fr..om other agencies to participate. Fast.Tracking eillows partial approvals so, long as
all necessary irnprovements- are finislied .prior to the- Certificate of Occupancy.
Winvest Development.-needs permit fram Building-& Safety, prior to demolition. The
Planning Dept. was unsure how Fast Tracking relates, to. phasing, but, is confident it
. can, be accomplished. They woul'd like 'to see a demolition master plan.
Dave Bolin says.oregardless of which. contractor is selected, to be qualified; they will
be proven In phased construction performance _ of a'' ar nature. Fast Track
perxnit, must be specif cally coordinated with .-Planning. The Fest Track perinit
approval process provides a-specific list, of appr,oved plans and -procedures, limits and
restrictions. Fees associated with Fast Track review are about double the normal -
process fees. Since this fee process.-is new, and a time a.nd"material contract, no one
- would venture what anticipated review fee costs might be.
-
4Other projects successful with the: Fast Track process are the. Boeing Fac' 'ty, the
Wa.ste to Energy project and some retail_,stores.
Steve Horobiowski said all environmental concerns had been addres~sed during~-the
zone change hearing process.
Ken Jeffrey requested' on-site office space~ for Building Safety to opera'te. Mr.
Bolin said he would -address it. Ken. Jeffrey said for a project of this size he would
h-ave l-3 -inspectors -at the site depending upon activity. Their approved inspectors
TEt~Aor ~n&eering, InC.
Civii Design -and Land Pianning
W: 106 Mission Ave: e Spokane. WA 99201 0 (509) 328-3371
FAX,; (509)' 328-8224
1
•
~ o
Un.iversity City Expansion
1Viin.utes - Page b -
will inspect-all elements of Section.306 of U.B.C. which must be Building' & Safety
certified. Tom Davis has a booklet of certified inspectors- pre-qualif`ied by $pokane
County. He agreed to forward a copy- to David 8olin.. Ken Jeffrey- said 'structural
issues- are- rigid. Non-structural issutes are inore flexible. New construction and'
chang►es need Buildi.ng & Safety approval ('.'.ed by stamp)_ prior to construction.
David.Bolin asked for a discussion on Certificate of Occupancy. Tom Davis said that,
a ba~s.ic rule of thunab is that all life-safety items inust, be in arid completed prior to.
is,suance of a Certificate of .Occupancy. A tempor-ary Certificate of ,Occupa.ncy can be
issued -pending completion of certain seasonAl or specisl site. improvements.
Gary Nelson explained the various. b.onding techniques available for required road,
drainage and lanciscape unprovements.
Examples used were:. '
Bond
Cash • dual savings - 9
Letter of Credit (Bank,agrees not.,to relinqui.sh)
Gary NeLson said he would provide David Boli.n with a handout expl -aining the
: options. -
David- Bolin thanked everyone 'for their participation and assistance and,stated that
Winvest-Development wouid continue to. keep in contact- as the project. progressed.
,
o _
,
M _/kmo
- 99 U-City Expansion.
. . •
Wor ernne~ Inc.
C'nril-Design.and ta,id Planning
W. 106 tilission;'Ave., a,Spokane. WA 93201 0 {509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-9224