ZE-0018A-89
• ; _ _ ~ _ Fq
-c,7.~
a s
~
A123 2
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE r;~,,, 4s t~~ << ti ~ P`-~ f
FINDIIVCS OF FACT. ONCLUSIONS_ AND ORDER INTRODUCTION
Ttus matter havuig come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on August 24,
1989, and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chauman, _
Lunell Haught and Phil Harris. 'PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Winvest Development Development Company, requests approval of a
zone reclassification from Commer+cial (C) and Multi Family Suburban (1VIFS) to
Regional Business (B-3), and a change of pnor cond.itions of approval to allow ~
strucnres to be located on grdund previously lunited to parking lot(s);-and a variance
to a lloim-few-er p a r k i ng spaces than req.uired by Zoiun g Re g ulations. F~le No's. ZE-'
~1$-89, ZE-SOA-87t and VE-3&89 are ~,ppl~caaons to perr~nit expansion~remodel o
~niversity Ci`t~-Shopping Cente~-~oviding approximately 450,000 sq. ft. of
additional retail area, cmema and food court, also construction of parking structures.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The pmperty is g+enerally locatod south of Sprague Avenue between Walnut and
University Road, and nortli of the realigned Milwaukee Road right of way.
c
2. The vommittee adopts the`Planning Deparement Report as a part of this recond.
,
3. The existing land use(s) in the area are Univetsity City Shopping Center, retail space,
offices, fire station, Spokane Transit Authority transfer site, suigle family residenves,
auto sales.
4. The Comprehensive Plan designat+es this site as Major Commercial and Urban. The
proposal is for the purpose of remodel/expansion of the University City shopping
Center.
5. The Arterial Roa,~d Plan has bew oomplied wnth as conditioned by the Mitigatied
Derernrination of Nonsignificamce.
6. The existing tioning of the property described in the apphcation is Commercial (C),
previously established in 1957 and 1961; Regional Business (B-3) previously
estabhshed in 1987 and Multiple Family Suburban (NIFS) estabhshed in 1939.
7. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Envuonmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Mingated Dewrnrination of Nonsignificance was issued, which
provides for roadway and cinailation requirements as more specifically specified with
the County Engineering Deparoments conditions of these Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Urder.
8. The proper legal reqwrements for advertisement and noace have been fulfilled.
9. No one appeared at the public heanng to oppose the proposal nor were any wntten
comments received adverse to the proposal.
\
. .
8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 2
10 The Committee addirionally finds.
a. That the parking vanance request is approvable in light of the condidons
nequinng bicycle racks andlor storage areas along v+nth the requirement to work
vnth Spokane Transit System (STA) to provide a pedestnan aocess to their site
located to the south.
b. The apphcant has subrrntted studhes, contained within the Planning Department -
files, that uedicated a trend towands calculating parlong demands based on gross
leasable area rather than gross buildable area- The Comrmttee concurs with this
standard in light of the mixed uses and varying peak bours that are common in
shopping venters of this size. Addiaonally, the Committee feels that due to the
cenoers cent=al location in tfie valley and being adjavent to STA's Transfer mte,
as well as the fact that the large number af employees will lilcely share ndes and
that retail uses generally stagger the number af employees worldng at any given
time, the parking varianoe reduction should not create a noticeable shortage
c. The parldng calculations per grvss bwldable area would include the covened
common mall area, however, if tfis mall area were not covered, it would not be
included in the required parking calctdatioas, thereby eliminating the neod for a
parkung variance 'The Crnrnnittee finds a Covered Mall is desirable because af
Sgokane's wide range of temperatures and weather condibons.
d. The project sponsor uidicated at the public hearing that he has constructed, or is
in the prooess af constructing, several shopping centers arouad the country,
i.e., New York City. Los Angelos, Seattle, Bellingham, with similar parking
provisions as has been requested on this proposaL
e. With the conditions of appraval set forth belaw, the vamance will a) not
constitutie a gtaating af special privlleges, b) ensure that the intent and purpose
of the Zonuig Code is achieved, and c) protect the environment, pubhc uiterest,
and general welfare.
I
f. Cranting the variaace wiff aot be mawrially detriaaental to the pubhc welfare nor
injunous to groperty or impi+o~vements in dhe viciiuty and zone.
g. Tfie strict application of the parking standards would create a handship to the
project in light of the suppornng find.ings contained herein.
h. That the appraval of this pmpasal will enhance the environment and its
aesthetics by the project now being subject to the cmrent Regional Bustness (B-
3) zone standands which will lunit advertising sign(s) height and surface area,
require compliance vnth Q208" stormwater reguladoos, provide for builduig
height limits adjacent wcertain residential zones, impose cwrent iandscaping
standands and provide aquifer protecaon by compihng wnth the Aqwfer
Sensitive Aiea Overlay Zone.
11. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area
12. The proposed zoning does implement and confarm to the Comprehensive Plan
• I
~
' 8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 3
13. The apphcant has demonstrated that conditions have substanaally changed since the
originall zoning of this area and aocordingly, the proposed zone reclassificaaon is
jusnfied.
14. The propased use will not be detnmental to the pubhc health, safety, or welfare
COIVVDTI'IONS OR COlv7'Ill1GENCIES APFI.IED TO THIS APPItUVAL
1. All Cond.itions unposed by the Hearing Exaacriner Committee shaU be buiding on the
"Applicant", which tenn shall include the owner or owners of the property, heus,
assigns, and suocessors-in-inwresL
2. That the parking variance request is approved for a ratio not to exceed S parking
spaces per 1000 sq. ft. of grass leasable area Gross leasable area in this uistance
includes those special uses such as the food oourt.
3. That the apphcant shaU submit tio the Planning Director, for review and deoemnnation,
the necessary documentation as s~Pecified within Section 14.802.140 Join -~gJ
Barki menm prior Lo issaance of any building permits.
4. That pnar to the release of any biriiding pernonts for this site, the applicant shaU
submit, m the Planning Duww for rmew and approval, or at his discretion at a
public hearmg before the Heaiing Examiner Committee, a"1ViasCer Developnaent
Plan;' wluch shaII incorpoate all conditions of appmval and comply with the
Regional Business (B-3) tione of the Zoning Code. Said Mastcer Development Plan
will be utilized to deaesmine phasing af the groject aad required improvements.
5. The Masster Develapment Pl,an shall aLso be in general;oonfonnance to the aesthetic
ooncepts presented by the apphCant at the public hemring. These aesthetics benefits
shaU inclnde additional landscaping adjacent to all btuldings, special landscaped
u+eatments adjacent m mrajur eatranoes to the buildings and parlang lotslstructures
which shaU comply with fire and traffic requhements.
6. The applicant shall ooardinate with the Spokan Transit System (STA) to incoparate
into dhe Mascer Development Plan, a pedestnan acoess to the STA transfer site locat-d
to the south acrass the Milwaulcee Road right of way. In addiaon the "]Plan" shaU
cromply with the Zoning Code's reqaiment fvr bicycle mcksJstorage areas which
shall be located at majar eauances to the shapping oenter.
7. All on-site hghting shaU comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the
Aupart Overlay Zone.
8. That compliance vnth all land9caping standards of the Zoning Code shall be provided
Wnth requutd "208" stoimwats drainage areas to be located adjacent to County rights
of way ar as approved by the Planning Direcoor. Said landscaping and "208" areas
may be combined as permitted by the Planning Direetor and the County Engtneer.
,
9. Landscape featums shall be pravided at least every 200 ft. and at each pubuc entrance
to the build.ings. These landscapcd features shall be at least 150 sq. ft. m area or as
approved by the Planning Duwor.
I
~ •
.
` 8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 4
10. That detached advemsing signs on tlus site shall be lirrUted to one sign along
Univermty Road, one sign aloog the Milwaukee Road right of way, zem signs along
Walnut Road and 2 signs along Sprague Avenue. Said detached signs shall be
liamted to 250 sq. ft. in surface area and 40' fL in height above grade. Attached signs
shall he as permitted by the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
11. That those conditions and agrements entered into regarhng the berricading of the
gravel pazldng lot (file #ZE-50-87) shall be bindmg and conanue until such time as
redevelopment of the site oocurs.
COUNTY PII..ANIIIING DEPARTMElV1'
1. That the following descnbed property shall be approved to the B-3 Zone and all
current standards of the Zoning Code as amend:ed shall be comphed with m the
development of this site
All those pornons of Tracts 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 and 228 of
Opportunity, as per plat thereof recorded in Volame "K" of PZats, pages 20, 21,
22, and 23, iacluding all of the vacated Obelin Road, vacated Belfour Road and
vacated Second Avenue laying within said tracxs; except that paction of Tract 223
ded~ca~ed tio Spokane County for Dartmouth Itoad; being more parncnlarly
descnbed as follows•
Beginning at the Nartheast carner of Tract 228; thenoe S. 87° 09' 37" W. along the
Nanth line of Tract 228 a distanoe of 15.00 feet, to the true point of beginning;
thence S. 87° 09' 37" W. oontmuing alang the north line af Tiact 228, a dlstance of
125.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave m the Southeast of a radius of
~ 900 00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 29° 26' 35", aa arc
` distance of 462.45 feet to the beg'inning of a reverse curve ooncave to the
Northwest with a radius of 800.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of
reverse cuive bears N. 32° 16 48" W.; tleace Southwestedy thmough a central
angle of 29° 26 57", an arc length af 411.19 feet to the end of curve; thence S. 87°
10' 09" W. a distance af 379:85 feet to the beginning of a cuave ooncave ro the
northeast with a radius of 800.00 feet; thenoe Northwestely through a oe,ntial angle
of 29° 25' 3911, an arc length 410.88 fat m the beginaing of a reverse curve
concave to the Southwest widi a radins of 900.00 feet a rvdial line through said
beginning of revetse curve bears S. 26° 35' 48" W.; thenoe Northwesterty through
a central angle vf 290 26' 11", an arc length of 462.39 feet to a paint on the South
line of Tract 224; thence S. 87° 09' 37" W. along said South line of Ti•act 224, a
distance of 91.21 feet; thenoe N. 2° 30' S3" W. alang a lin.e being parallel to and
8.00 feet east of the West line of the east half of Tract 224, a distance of 443 56
feet; thence N. 87° 09' 32" E., a distance of 319.20 feet to a point on the West li.ne
of Tract 223,; thence N. 2° 30' 53" W. along the West line of Tract 223, a distance
of 200.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract 223; thence N. 87° 09' 3?" E. along
a South right of way line for Sprague Avenue, a distance of 1,925.20 feet to a point
on the West right of way lwe for Untversity Roa,d; thence S. 48° 37' 28" E. along
the West right of way far University Road, a distance of 31.74 feet; thence S. 2°
30' S3" E, contiauing along the West right of way hne, a distanoe of 621.56 feet, to
the true point of beginning.
• •
~
•
8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 5
2 The Planning Director/designee shall appmve a specific extenar lighung plan for the
approved area pnor to installation of such lighdng, (Such plan shall attempt to
confine illummauon to the area vnth full consideration to adjacent properties)
3 The applicant shall develop subject pnopeaty generally in accordance vnthin the
concept presented to the Heanng Ex,amincr Committee. Vanaaons, when approved
by the Plammmg Dhremr/designee, will be permitted, including, but not linuted to
the following changes: builcLng location, landscape plans, and general allowable
uses of the peimitted zone All vari.ations must conform to regulaaons set forth in
the ZONING OODE FOR SFOK:ANE COUN'I'Y. The onginal intent of the
development plans shall be mauitained.
4. The project is subject to Section 14.706, tfie Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone
of the ZONING CODE FOR SFOK:ANE COUNTY, which sets forth vanous
measure.s for Aqmfer protection; specifically, measures deahng with wastewater
d.isposal, spill grotection measures, and stormwater runoff.
5. The present proposal is not detailed enough to determuie whether ar not the use of
vr matenals stamd on the site are in compLance with Secaon 14.706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of the ZONING CODE FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY•
Accordingly, as a cond.ition of approval, the sponsor/apphcant shall be required to
file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of
Firtdings and Oraer of the final decsion in this matter, a"Noaoe to the Public"
wluch shall pravide in inaterial as follows:
PRIOR TO 1'fE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUII.DING PERNIIT OR CERTIECATE
OF OCCUPANCY FOR AP1Y BUII.DING OR ANY USE ON T'HE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
'FOR COMP'LYIlNG WITH THE PROVISIONS OF TBE ZONING C4DE FOR
SPOKANE COUNTY SECI'ION 14.706 (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA
OVERLAY 7ANE). THE PROPERTY WHIGH IS TI-E SUBJECT OF THIS
NOTICE LS MORE PARTI Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
6. Applicant shall comply with '08' rec;ommendadons concenung stonmwater runoff
and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
7. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or ttansfer, shall comply vnth
RCW 58 17 and the Spokarte County Plaarng Qrchnances pnor to issuance of
buildmg pernuts.
8 The Spokane County Planning Departrnent shall prepare and record vnth the
Spokane County Auditor a'Tide Notioe" notmg that the property in question is
subJect to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of apprnval of a land
use acaon. This "Title Notive" shall serve as of'icial public notice regarding
condidons of approval affecting the property in quesaon. The "T'ide Notice" shall
be recorded within fifteen (15) days offinal disposition of the approved land use
action and shaU only be exdnguished by the Spokane County Planning Department
The "Title Notioe" shaU geneTally provide as follows:
The parcel of proped-ty leplly described as (legal description and tax parcel
number) is the subject of a Iand use action, imposing a variety of
special deve0opment conditions, by a Spodcane County Hearing Body
.
.
,
' 8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 6
i
or Administarative Offncie0 on (dcite) and as msybe amended, aitered or
suppBernented by otficeel actiore or as already changed. File 1Vo.
(Planntng Deprartment Fele Number) is available for inspection and oopying
in the Spokane County Planning lDepartareent.
9. A spetific landscage plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
aoceptable to the Spokane Caunty Planning Directar/designee shall be submitted
with a performance bond for the project pnor to release of building pernmt.
CO[JN'g'Y ENGINEEItING DEPARTMEN'T
Priar To Th I~ ssuanot_QLA ByildingySnniLOr Ug Of Th As ~+n~os~i:
1. Applicane shall petidon the Board of County Comnussioners for the vacation of
Dartmouth Road from Spragae to the Mlwaukee Road R.O.W.
2. Applicaat shall dedicate nght of way along University Road consistent with the plan
view of the alignment wtuch is attached and made a part of the recond. Ile right of
way dedication is as follows:
1. A?2' X 24' triangle at the northwest carner of #2,
2. 39' from the eAisting R.O.W. for 186' south of #1,
3. A transition from 39' to 27' from the exisang R.O.W. for 266 south of #2,
4. 27' from the existing R.O.W. for 140.6 south of #3,
5. A 27' X 27' triangle at the southwest corner of #4
3. Aocess Feralits for appraaches to the Couaty Raad System shall be obtained from
the Spokane County Engineer.
4. Applicant shall improve Univeisity Road west of the section line, from Sprague
Ave. to their soudl pmperty fiae in accordance with the appmved typical cross
,5,~ view of this
secuon(s) on file vinth die County Engiaeer's Office. 11
ali~nnaent is atta,ched and made a part of the rocord.
5. Apphcant shall icrpmve the Sprague Ave. - University Road intersection as
neoessary, including upgrading ar replacing the existing sigaal system, m oonform
to the requued impmvements to University Road south of Sprague Ave.
6 Apphcant shall oonstruct asecond west bound left turn lane on Sprague Ave. at
Uruversity Road as recommmded in the traff'ic unpact study.
7. Apphcant shall oonstruct a fzee nght tarn lane on Umversity Road, South of
Sprague Ave., as recommended in the traffic irnpact study.
~8. In the event that the County is unable to oonstruct a traffic signal system at
Uaiversity and Fourth as per the cuirent adopted 6 year coastrucuon program, then
the applicant shall construct a new signal system at 4th Avenue on Uruvermty Road,
as recommended in the traffic impact study
9 Apphcant shall construct channelizaaon modifications on Sprague Ave. as
recommended in the final appro ed tir-dfic cu~culanon and pariang plan
'
~
~
.
.
' 5-89 NEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 7
10. Applicant shell relocate or nconstruct the eusting Felts Road traffic signal on
Spragne Ave as recommended in the final appivved tcaffic cuculation and parking
plan
11. AppLcant shall submit for approval by the Spakane County Engineer road,
drainage, and aems plans for the requu+ed improvements.
,
12. The applicant shall submit for apprdval by the Spokane County Engineer and che
Spokane County Health Disnrict a detailed aombined on-site sewage system plan
and surface wateer disposal p18n for dte entire project or any portion thereof, if the
development is to be phased.
13. A parldng plan and traffic cizculafton plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location, and anangement of partang staUs
shall be in aacoidance with standard aaffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be requmed for any portion of
the project which is to be oocupied or traveled by vehncles.
14. The oonstructioa of the ro0rdway impro~vements stat,ed berein shall be aocomplished
as approved by the Spolmne County Enginw. ,
15. All required icn~rovements shall confwm m the cuirent State of Washingc+on
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable
County standards and/or a,dapted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stoimwater Management in effect at the date of constructioa, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
. 16. Avcess to the fonner Milwaukee Road Right of Way shall be prohibited, both from
the site and fmm Walnut Road.
17. Roadway standards, typical roadway secctions and drainage plan r+equirements are
found ia Spokene Board of County Conunissioners' Resolution No. 84-1592 as
ameaded and are applicable to this proposal.
18. All nequired constiruction widtin the existing ar proposed public right of way is to
be campleoed prior to the rekasc of a bnilding permit or a bond in the amount
estunated by the County F.ngineer to cover die oast of oonstruction of imptvvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
COUN'I'Y Ua'EI.H'H'IES DEPAR'i'MEN'I'
1. Apphcant shall submit a revisod water and sewer conaection plan to be reviewed by
the County Utilities Deparamt.
COLJN'I'Y HEAL'I'H DIST'RICF
1. Sewage disposal method shaII be as authoriwd by the Du-ector of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coondinated through the DLmctor of Utihties, Spokane
County.
.
~ .
.
' 8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page 8
3. Water service shall be by an existing pubhc water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social 8c Health Services
4. A pubLc sewer system will be made avaulable for the project, and mdwidual service
will be provided to each lot gnor to sale. Use of induvidual on-site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authonzed.
5 The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "LTse of private wells and water
systems is prohibited."
COUIVTY BUII.DING AIVD SAFETY DEPAR'ICMEN'I'
1. ne apphcant shall cantact ttte Deparnneat of Budding arsd Safety at the earbest
possible stage of design/devetopment in oraer to be infonmed of Code requu+ements
adauniswred/enforced by the department, e.g., State Build.ing Code Act regulaaons
such as requirements for fire bydrant/flow, fine apparatus access roads, street
address assignment, barrier-free regulations, energy code regulaaons, and general
c,aordmadon with other aspects af project implen~entation.
2. The issuance of a building peTmit by the Department of Building and Safety is
required.
3. Requuements of F'ire District No. l need to be satisfied during the builduig pernnit
process.
4. Demolition permits are reqvaed.
_ WA'I'ER PIJRVEYOIt
:
1. Water Purveyor is ARodearn F.lectnc Water Company and they will supply the site
with adequate water for domestic, fire and 'urigation u5es although arraagements
have not been made.
SPOKAIVE COUN'I`Y AIR POY.I.U'I'HON COA1'H'ROL AUTHOIItYT`jl
1. Dust emissions must be controlled during demolitian, construction and excavaaon.
2. 1Vleasur+es must be taken to avoid the depasition of dirt and mud from unpaved
swfaces onto paved surfaces. If hracldng or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immediately m clean these surfaoes.
3. All traveled smfaoes must be paved and kept clean. °
4. Arncle V of,SC;APCA Regulation I requues a Notioe of Conswction and
Apphcation of Approval for all air pollution emission sources. Ttus includes such
sources as heating wuts greaner than 400,000 Btui/hr.
5. Demohaon projects must coflaply with the requirements of CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart
M. Intent to Deanohsh and Rennovate forms are available at the SCAPCA office.
. .
► . ' ►
rJ. r
8-89 HEC Order for ZE-18-89 Page
ORDER
The Hearing Exammer Committ,ee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
applicaaon of ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87 and VE-38-89 for a rezone classificaaon from
Commermal (C) and Muld Fanuly Suburban (MFS) to Regionai Business (B-3) and
for a change of condiaons and a vanance as descnbed in the apphcation should be
APPROVED.
Motion by: Phil Hams Seconded by: Lunell Haughe
Vote: (3-0) t]NANIMOUS TO APPROVF.
HEA►RIHO EXAhJINER (2D
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOrI'E
~
r - ^
A1'IE,ST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Diww
.
- 4,,.* zn o ~ w
By HOROBIOwSK-I
Current Planning Administrator
~4u aS' rP~
~
.
1 -
Cancnlcd ENGINE~it's REVTEW SHEE'T
Datc Fi,ed
Date As Built Ptaiu Rcccived
Date itoad Pluns AWxovcd DR REZONE FILE # ZE-001 gA-g9 -q°
New Roaci Standards 5-15-93 Mylar
Companion Fife N;
Hearing Date: H Time: 1-1 Number: Related File "L.E-0018-89
DESIGN Review Dace: 06/1211997 DR Time: 02:15 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: DESIGN REVIEW #
Date Received: 0512311997 Review Typx: LarBe t-°c T i gidg, Syuare Fccr.
Na• Lots: No. Acces: 0
Project Name: 11-3 CHG UF CUND R,ngi.-TaWmr,m.secuoQ: aa..zs_Zo
Site Address: S SPR/1GiJFJW UNIVERSfI'Y/N 2ND/E WALNUT , PAtcEL(5): (fimt Zo)
Applicant Name: BFRNARDO WILLIS ARC'H-BERNARDO, GARY Mone 938-4511 45 201.0109 45201.0210 45201.03ou 45:01.0e13
Applicant Address: 107 S HOWARD STE 420 phone 2# {S09) 838-4605 45201,2304 45201_2303
SPOItANE. wA 99204
Date corditKms Mtikd:
Flood Zarse: No Water Source: 4 Sewer Source: 5 School Dist: Fire Dist: 1 Phanc Dist: US WE.ST
Bilfing Ndnte: Owner: UNn'MrrY CtTY INC Enginerr:
Address: Owner Address: 201 W h'OR'iH RNER Company:
SPOKANE, WA 94:01 Addtm:
Phunc: Owner Phore: (509) 459-610U Ph~~nc ~
Signed Name
Building # 456-3675 ! Planning M 456-2105 Cnntact: JOHN PEDERSON
Date Submtttcd Descri[tion i~tials -
• ~ ~ ~ DATE TECHIJICALLY COMPLETE [Traific Acralysis Requirai)
06I12!1997 DATE NOT TECIINICALLY CoMPLE'TE
DATC PAY FEF.S RECEIVED
DATE PRI4RITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED AIYD COPY TO ACCOUNTING ,
1 / NOTICE TO PUBLIC ! N01'ICfi TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 b COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO IiE SIGNED
In-0ut rl In-Otn 12 ln-Qut A3
DESIGN DEYIATION DATES IN-OUT
In-Out M4 in-O+u 03 ln-0ut A'6
I i BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE TTEM CALCULATED ~
DATE BOND RECEIVe.D BO1VD AMOCiNT RL-CEIVED
DA'I'E BUND KELE:ASf: - DATE DOXlU REDt1CED I3nNIl I3AI.ANCI:
11C:ir4 Date Decision Approved Dtnicd Conunucd Appcaled BCC Approved Dcnicd
Appealad ta Coun Approval Ocnicd Continucd Fuml Projcct Staws
STAMPED IvIYIARS TO PERMI'[' TECIIN1C[AN (SYL) I
! / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETA.RY (SANDY)
• ~ .
w ~ •
C.►IxclLd !.<<{ hiiGINEER' S EVAW SHEET
Du1r Filni
Date As Bui1t Plam Rcceivcd
Date Raad Plans Approvcd REZONE FILE # ZE-0018A-89 -ag
New Roacf Standardti 5-15-95 titv}ar n:
~ Companian Fite n :
Hearing Date 04129l1998 Fi Tiine: 10:30 H Numtkr: ~ Rttated File ►h: '1.1=-(K)18-89.I3S11-56
T'cchnic:al Review Uate: 0611211997 TR Time: 02:15 Duilding Dept
Revicw . Datc: R Time: it Numbr_ .r. . ~~H REVIEW # I
Date Ret:cived: 05123;1yy7 Review "rype: Large Luc 1_. Bldg. Syuare hxc _
No. I.ot Nc►. Acre 0
Project Name: B-3 CHG UF COND Range-Township-Sectirnn: a:i- 25 - to
Sice Address: S SPRAGUEJW UNIVERStTYly 2ND1F WALNUT PARCEi.(S7: (rrsc 20)
Applicant tiame: BERNAR.DO WILLIS ARCH-BERNARDO, GARY ['hone (509) 838-4511 45201.0109 45201.0210 45201.0308 45201.0413
Phane 2# (509) 8384605 452011304 45201.2305
:1ppfi::a►a Adclrrss: 107 S HOWARD STE 420
SE'UKANE, 1t'.1 9920•11
Dacc Curxiitions :►ta►leti:
i~lck~ Lc7ne N~~ Watcr 4 5e~~er 5 Scltc,ul Firc 1 Phutu US WF.ST 1-~~-
BiUiug (?wner: UNri'ERSITY CITY L'v'C Engineer
Aciclress: Addrr5~ 201 W NORTH R1VER Cotnpany
sIIoKAyC, wA 99201 Address:
Plx►ik: Phone. (~00, ) 459-611 xl Phu►x::
Fa.x:
Signed Name
Building # 456-3675 ! Planning A+ 455-2205 Cantaci: JOI-IN PEnERSUNII.UUIS WEL3S'IZR
T) t S ~hmitter# ~~jj,~ , Inic!
(►.~107i1998 llATE TECfiNICAI.LY COME'IE'1'E ITi3fIIl AiL7IYSi5 RC'tlU1fCLI)
06.12i 1997 DATE NOT TF.CI-INICALLY CONiPLETE I
nA'I'E PAl' I'E-[:S ~'.F:CEIVLD
UATE PRIORITY FE£S RECEIVI:U COPY TO ACCOtJNTING
r1NAL PLAT FEES COM1'LETED AND COPI' TO ACCOUNZ'1NG
NOTICE TO PUBLIC ! NOTICE TO PUIILIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
lu Uut NI Ir;-t7ut 4' it?x!: ;
DE:SIGN I)EVIA7'IQN DA"I'FS LN-OUT
in•Otu,14 rn
i / QOND QUANTITIES FOR DR:IINAGE ITEM CALCULATED I
DA'1'E: B4ND RI?CEIVFn BO?vD :1MOt"NIT RFCrIXT_D
I)ATI: Iif)Nll RELE:.ASL' - DA'I'E IiUND Rf:[lU('[:D I3UND T3:1I..AftiCT
Flrarin~ Uate 1)ect:,i.~r :~p{,i.,-%cJ l~inucJ ~uilt:u:i~~f :tipI~:Jlc~! f3t_'(~ Approt~ed I~.~niat!
AppraIrci WCourt Approvuct Ueuicxl Cuiuiiwoci Pina] Projcm Staiu,
STARIPED hiYLARS TO I'ERMIT 'CEGIlN1CIAN (SYI..)
, STANIPCD 208 LOI' PLNNS 'lC) SL;('(tL'TAR1' (SAND1')
- ~
♦
• ~
•
1/ . Z. - - _ - ~
Ay
~
- - - - - 3 y , - . - - _
- - - - - - ~i ~v~-~- ~ - - - - - -
.
_ . _ - - - Q • - - - -~9 - ; - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - -
N -
- - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - - -
- - f - - - - - • - - - - .
- • - ~ . - ~ ~ „ - - • . _ - - -
1y ~
VA_
^1
- - ~ ~ _ J _ r ~ _ - _ . - . - . - -
,
• ~ ..r ~ ~ ~
I ~
- - ~ ~ r - - - - -
~
- - ~ ~ . _ _ . - -
V~
. ~
~
~ - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - -
_ • 27 ~ N
~ ~j _ _ . 7 _ t _ ~ _ _
- - - . . . - ~ - _ ~ - - -
.r, ' I
- - - -t - - ~ - - - • - - -
i'
, - - - - - ~ -
,
- - - : _
,
Z ~ ~y • ~
, I.~a~.•-...., - - ' ~ -
~l~. _
- ~ ~
'
• ~
I ~
, I~
J
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EX:AIVIINER
RE Change of Conditions in the Exlsting ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Regional Business (B-3) Zone ) C0NCLUSIONS AND
Applicant Uruversity City, Inc ) DECISYON
Fl le No ZE-1 SA-89 )
1. SUMJVIARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: AppLcation for a change of conditions m the eaclshng Regionai Business (B-3)
zone, to delete and modify the conditions unposed on a previous zone reclassufication, change of
conditions and vanance in Bwlding and Planning Division File Nos ZE-I 8-89/ZE-50A-87/VE-
3`8-89, regarding site plan, landscaping, drainage, signage, parking lot and nght of way
requsrements
Decision: Approval o.f the application in part, and demal of the appucation in part
H. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
- The Heanng Exam.iner has reviewed the change of conditions application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findmgs of fact and concluslons
A. GENERA►I, INFORMATION:
ApplicantJAgent: Gary Bernardo, Bernardo-Wills Arclutects, 107 South Howard, Suite 420,
Spokane, WA 99204
Lega1 Owner University City, Inc, c/o Goodale & Barbien Company, 201 West North
River Dnve, Spokane WA 99201, and c/o I3 James Magnuson, 816 Shermara Avenue, P O
Box 2288, Coeux d'alene, TD 83816-2288
Loeatioa: Generally located south of and adjacent to'Sprague Avenue, west of and adjacent
to University Road in Section 20, To'wnship 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washangton
Legal Description: That portion of Short Plat No SP-1019-95 and that portion of the Plat of
Opportunuty, as pex Plat recorded m Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, 21, 22 and 23 in the
Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washuigton, being more particularly descnbed as follows
Begulning on the South nght of way line of Sprague Avenue at the Northwest corner of Lot
`B" of Shorr Plat No SP-1019-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85, Spokane
County, Washington, thence S 02° 30' 34" E, along the West line of sald Lot `B", 160 09 feet
to the Southwest corner of said Lot `B", thence N 87° 49' 35" E, along the South line of said
Lot "B", 126 56 feet to the Southea,st cornei of saad Lot "B" and the West nght of way line of
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 1
'S
Uruversity Road, thence S 02° 30' 34" E, along said West nght of way line, 559 62 feet to the
centerline of proposed 2°d Avenue, thence S 84° 45' 03" W, along the propased centerline of
2"a Avenue, 203 74 fzet to the beg7ruung of a curve to the left the radius of wtuch bears S 05°
14' 57" E, a d.istance of 700.00 feet, thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the left,
through a eentral angle of 16° 15' 08", an arc distance of 198 56 feet to a pomt of tangency,
thence S 68° 29' 55" W, along said proposed centerlme, 393 88 feet to the beglnning of a curve
to the nght the radius of wlvch bears N 21 ° 30' OS" W, a distance of 700 00 feet, thence a.Iong
said proposed centerline and curve to the, nght, through a central angle of 18° 39' 41", an arc
distance of 227 99 feet to a pomt of tangency, thence S 87° 09' 36" W, along said proposed
centerline, 646 08 feet to the begmning of a curve to the nght the radius of which bears N 02°
50' 24" W, a distance of 1000 00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the
nght, through a central angle of 15° 51' 28", an arc distance 276 77 feet to a poLnt of tangency,
thence N 76° 58' 56" W, along smd proposed centerline, 339 14 feet, to the projected East nght
of way line of Walnut Road, thence N 02° 30' 34" W, along sa.id East nglit of way line, 596 55
feet to the South luie of the North 200 00 feet of Tracts 224 and 223 of sazd Plat of Opportunity,
thence N 87° 09' 35" E, aJong said South line, 503 80 feet to the West nght of way line of
Dartmouth Road, thence N 02° 30' 34" W, along saicl West nghht of way line, 200 00 fect to the
South nght of way line of Sprague Avenue, thence N 87° 09' 35" E, along said South nght of
way lule, 1610 04 feet to the Point of Beginrung
Zoning: Regional Busmess (B-3) zone
Comprehensive Plan Cutegory: The property is designated in the Urban category and the
Major Gommercial category of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan The site
is also located wittun the Pnonty Sewer Sernce Area, Aquifer Sensitive Area, and the Urban
Impact Area deslgnated in the Comprehensive Plan
Eavironmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the
Division of Bwlding and Planning on March 9, 1998
Site Description: The site is approximately 41 5 acres tn size and is flat The subject
property is developed with the University City Shoppmg Center, which currently has a gross
leaseable retail area of approximately 428,685 square feet This lncludes a covered mall with
390,000 square feet of gross leaseable area, and satellite retail pads totaling 38,685 square feet of
gross leaseable area The satellite retail pads include a tu-e store located near Sprague Avenue,
and a specialty retail stnp located west of Dartmouth Road, at some distance south of Sprague
Avenue The mall has a partial upper level for parking in the midclle Most of the site is covEred
with buildings and paved parkuig areas, aaong with somc landscaping and some undeveloped
areas Undeveloped areas include land lying south of the covered ma]] and land 1}rmg along the
westerly boundary of the site A small amount of paved parking exisis umediately soueh of the
paved access road tbat runs behlnd the existing mall See aenal photo submitted by applicant,
marked as exlubit E, and see descnphon of site improvements in Traffic Iriapact Assessment
prepared by Taylor Engi.neenng dated 1-15-98
The shoppin~ center was uutially constructed around 1960, wrth some modification to the site
improvements having taken place since that time Compare site plan dated 1-8-88 in File No
ZE-50-87 and Figure F2 a.n Traffic Impact Assessment dated 1-15-98 in File No ZE-18A-89 A
HE Fmdings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Pacre 2
~
,
two-lot short plat was approved by the County in 1996 in File No SP-95-96, whcch dlvided the
shopping center property into the current site arad the 20,000 square foot Taco Bell property
which Ues at the southwest comer of Uruversity Road and Sprague Avenue Numerous tenants
have left the shopping center in recent years, mfluenced by the construction of a new regional
mall rn the Valley area The old Rosauer's store buildmg that previously existed at the east end
of the mall, along with part of the old Newberry's store, is being demohshed to make room for a
new and larger Rosauer's store
Zoning History of Site: Between 1957-1961, most of the site was zoned for commercial
development under the now expu-ed County Zomng Ordinance In 1988, approxunately six (6)
acres lying immedlately south of the mall and north of a 100-foot county right of way was added
to the site and rezoned to the B-3 zone, to provide addifional parking See Heanng Examiner
Committee (I-1EC) decision dated 3-3-88, staffreport dated 3-3-88, and site plan dated 1-8-88 in
Building and Planmng File No ZE-50-87 In 1989, the HEC approved a change of the
conditions to the rezone granted ui Flle No ZE-50-87 for six (6) acres, rezoned the remainder of
the site to the B-3 zone, approved a vanance to allow fewer parlcing spaces on the site than
requved by the B-3 zone, and estabbshed conditions of approval for the entrre property See
HEC decision dated 8-25-89 and staff report dated 8-24-89 in File Nos ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87
and VE-38-89 The HEC's decision permitted expansion and remodeling of the sliopping
center, authonzing 450,000 square feet of addiihonal re#ail area, cinema and food court, along
~ with some new parking structure construction The 1989 proposal contemplated a gross building
area of approxinately 1,009,516 square feet and a gross leaseable area of 836,104 square feet
- See site plan dated 7-25-89 in such files The HEC's decision requued the applicant to submit a
"Master Development Plan" for site development, incorporatrng all conditions of approval and
illustratuig compliance wrth the development standards of the B-3 zone The 1989 proposal was
never pursued by the applicant
Sorroundi.ng Conditions: The site is located along the south slde of Sprague Avenue and
the east slde of Uruversity Road, whlch roads are designated as Pruicipal Artenals by the County
Artenal Road Plan The Artenal Road Plan also illustrates a future Prlncipal Artenal, Controlled
Access/High Capacity roadway along the south boundary of the site The County Engineer has
adopted road plans to make such artenal a ene-way couplet with Sprague Avenue, to be known
as the "Valley Couplet" Walnut Raad, which was located along the west boundary of the site at
the hme of the 1989 redevelopment proposal, has been vacated Except to the south, the land
adjacent to the site or adjacent to the site across public roads is developed with cornmercial uses
on land zoned B-3 A large Spokane Transit Authonty bus transfer facilsty is located south of
the site, at the northwest corner of Uruversity Road and Fowtll Avenue ResidenUal uses and
vacant land are found in the area lying south of ihe site and the south leg of the proposed Valley
Couplet, on land zoned U~.Z-3 5, UR-22 or B-3 Sprague Avenue represents a major traffic and
commercial comdor through tbe Spokane Valley area of the county A new regional shopping
mall was recently constructed a number of miles northeast of the site, along the north side of
Interstate 90 west of Sullivan Road
Project Description: The applicant seeks a change of condrtions m the B-3 zone, to delete
and/or modify certain conditions of approval imposed in File Nos ZE-18-89/ZE-50A-87/VE-38-
89 relating pnmanly to site plan, landscaping, signage, drainage, parking lot and ng,ht of way
requlrements The apphcant's proposed changes are set forth in Attachment #l to the charage of
condlhons applicatYOn, and in Exhiblts C-D subrmtted at the pubiic heanng The stte plan of
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-1 8A-89 Page 3
record submitted 1-1 -98 11 lustrates existing and future bwlding pads for the shopping center A
new Rosauer's stor-e is planned at the east end of the mall The site plan illustrates the creauon of
a new five (5) acre parcel that would include the Rosauer's store and its assoclated parking area
to the north Prehminary bind.ing site plan approval has been granted to a two-lot binding site
plan to divide the site, m File No BSP-56-97 The 1-1-98 site plan indicates that the area lying
behween tlie new Rosauer's store and the old Penny's store (Major Retailer #2 build.ing) would
be removed from the existing enclosed mall Also see testimony of Gary Bernardo The old
Rosauer's store and selected porhons of the enclosed mall wil] be demolished See
Envuonnental Checklist, p 2, answer to question #11
Three major retail pads and two smaller commercial pads are proposed for the area of the site
lying west of Darnnouth Road, replacing the existing retail improvements East of Dartmouth
Road, the site plan shows three new, small commercial pads along the north boundary of the site,
and three neNv, small commercial pads along the southerly border of the property Several new
points of egress are illustrated to the south leg of the proposed Valley Couplet ("Second
Avenue") The site plan also illustrates the proposed vacation of Dartmouth Road and 1ts
revision to a pnvate dnve The 1-1-98 site plan of record tists the total bullding area for the
proposal as 506,373 square feet, with either 2,383 or 2,388 parlnng spaces proposed The
applicant proposes to redevelop the site in phases7over several years, starttng with the new
Rosauer's store, then addmg the satellite retail pads along the north side of Sprague Avenue, and
thereafter adding the other proposed improvements contingent on construction of the proposed
Valley Couplet See Traffic Impact Assessment dated 1-15-98
B. PROCEDUItAL INFORMATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning, Code Section 14 504 040, and
Zonmg Code Chapters 14 628, 14 802, 14 804 and 14 806
Heariag Date and Location: Apn129, 1998, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commussioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
Notices: Mailed Apnl 13, 1998 by applicant
Posted Apnl 15, 1998 by applicant
Published Apnl 10, 1998
Compliance The legal requirements for pubiic notice have been met
Site Visit: June 1211998
Hearing Proeedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Examiner Orduiance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure)
Testimonv:
Louis Webster and John Pederson Scott Engelhard
Division of Building and Planning Division of Engineenng and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
HE Finclings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 PaQe 4
~
Larry Herberholz Gary Bernardo
817 North Stevenson Court 107 South -Howard
Liberty Lake, WA Spokane, WA 99204
David Peterson
2619 South Bannen Court
Veradale, WA 99037
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehenmve Plan, Spokane County Zonuig Code,
Spokane County Code, and Spokane Counfiy Resolution No 96-0171 and 96-0294 The record
includes Building and Planning File Nos ZE-18A-89, ZE-18-89, ZE-SOA-87 and VE-38-89
C. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS ANALYSIS:
Spokane County Zorung Code 14 504 040 requires that applicahons for sigruficant changes
to the approved site development plans for zone changes be approved by the Heanag Body
following a public heanng The County Heanng Examnner Ordmance provides some guidance
for consideration of a change of conditions apphcation Generally, a change of conditions may
be approved if it 1) wiU not be detrimental to thepublic health, safety and general welfare, 2)
compLes with the State Envuonmental Pohcy Act (SEPA), and 3) coinphes with the Spokaiae
County Zonung Code and other appllcable land use regulations The Heanng Exammmer may
consider the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, the Spokane Coonty Zoiung
Code, SEPA, the County's Local Environmental Ordtnance, and other applicable land use
regulations in making such,determinafions See County Resolurion No 96-0171, Section 11
The Hearing Examuner xnay impose condifiions on the applicahon to protect the publtc health,
safety and general welfare, or to mitigate environmental unpacts A change of conditions is not a
rezone because it does not change the actual zone of the property, although it may affect the
pemutted uses, locaUon of buildings, landscaping, conditions of approval and other features in a
site development plan that were approved in conjuncbon wlth a pnor rezone
The appllcant seeks to delete or modify the conditions of approval and the site development
plan approved in conjunction with the zoning actions taken by the Spokane County Heanng
Examiner Commrttee (HEC) in its decision dated August 25, 1989 The apphcant's request for
change of conditions is refleeted in Attachment#1 to the apphcatton, and in Exhlbits C and D
submitted at the public heanng The StaffReport on pages 45 contasns a general analysis of the
Comprelaensive Plan poLeies applicable to the change of conditions, whtch analysis the
Exanuner adopts herein There was no pubhc opposition to the project, althoughh County staff
and publlc agencies objected to a nurober of the proposed changes
1 Parkine vanance condrtion
The applicant requested delehon of HEC condition #2, relating to the parking vanance
approved m File No VE-38-89 The applicant proposes to comply with the parlcing
requirements of the B-3 zone, wlmch the applacant ind2cates will require a miniraum of 2,382
parking spaces See Exhibit D The Division ofBuAding and Planrung is not able to venfy the
required number of parking spaces because the site plan of record dated 1-I -98 does not contain
enough specific informaiion on the proposed uses to allow County staff to allow such
HE Findings, Concluslons and Decision ZE-1 8A-89 Page 5
i
venfication See Staff Report, p 5 However, such determinaiion can be made pnor to the
issuance oFa building permit It is noted that the July 25, 1989 site plan submitted for File No
ZE-18-89 would have required approximately 4,180 parking spaces for the redevelopment plan
proposed in 1989, based on HEC condition #2 and the gross leaseable area of sucb proposal
indicated on such srte plan New multi-level parking stivetures were proposed to accommodate
such parking in the 1989 plan
2 Landscanine conditions
The applicant requested deletion or revision of a number of the conditions relating to
landscaping which were imposed by the HEC on the 1989 redevelopment proposal See Exhibit
D The applicant requested deletion of HEC condition #5, which condition requued the
uncorporation of certain aesthetic concepts descnbed by the applicant at the August 24, 1989
pubhc heanng for the 1989 redevelopment proposal, into a required "Master Developmeot Plan"
Such aesthetic concepts included "addihonal landscapmg adjacent to all buildings, special
landscaping treatments adjacent to major entrances to the buildings and parking lots/structures
which shala comply wtth f re and traffic reqwrements" The applicani also requested revisaon of
HEC condition #8, to lim.it compliance with the landscapmg requirements of the Zoning Code to
the newly developed azeas of the site instead of the enhre site The applicant further requested
delehon of HEC condltion #9, which required that special landscaping features be provided
"every 200 feet and at each public entrance to the building", which features were to be "at least
150 square feet in area or as approved by the Plantung Director" These are apparently the same
features referenced in I-IEC condrtlon #5 -
County staff requested that the enhre site be requued to comply with the landscaping
standards applicable to the site under the Zotung Code, but did not oppose delehon of the special
landscaping standards tmposed by HEC conditions #5 and #9 See Staff Report, p 6, testimony
of Louis Webster and John Pederson, and letter dated 7-8-97 from Stacy Bjordahl to Gary
Bernardo The site plan dated 1-1-98 i1}ustrates special landscaping at the vanous mall entrances
to the site, w}uch landscaping,is ,not an issue Tbe site plan also illustrates five (5) feet of Type
TII landscaping along the borders of the site with adjacent public nghts of way, as reqwred by
Zonuig Code 14 806 040 (2)(c) This penmeter landscaping is also not at issue Zolung Code
14 802.2201mposes vanous landscaping requirements on parkulg areas associated with land
developmeat It is these landscaping requirements which the applicant wants to limit to newly
developed areas of the site, and wluch County staff requests be applied to ttie entire site
Zoning Code Chapter 14 802 establisbes parkuig area requuements for the vanous types of
uses contemplated by the Zoning Code Zoning Code 14 802 220 requues the installahon of
specif c landscaping fearures in the parking areas developed on a site Zonung Code 14 802 220
(5) generally requires that at least 10% of the parking area on a site be devoted to landscaping,
that the landscaped areas be at least 32 square feet in size, that all parkulg stalls be located no
more than 60 feet from a landscaped area, unless a more effective landscapmg altemative
approved by the Division of Building and Planning is devised ta such specification, and that all
landscaping be located between parking stalls, aC the end of parking,columns, or between stalls
and the property line
In concludi.ng that the landscaping requirements of the Zoning Code should be applied to
the entire site, County staff cited Zoning Code 14 806 020, which provides as follows
HE Findan~s, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 6
1
14 80G 020 Annlrcotcon
1 Tl1e Planntng Departnient shall revicew and n7ay approve with
ntodificatrons, or dtsapprove site landscape developme»t plans for all
new developrnents in accordance wtth the provrsions of thrs section
The Department may permrt alternative landscaping (as set forth in
Sectrorr 14 806 080) when the overall stte lartdscape development plan,
as proposed by the applicant, pf•ovrdes as good or better results than
requrred by tjits section,
2 Developments involving udditrons or alteratcons to exrstrng smtclrares
in whrch tjie cost of the addriions or alterattons exceeds frfty percent
(SO%) ojthe vulue of the existcng structure(s) or tmprovements (vatue
shall be determinedfrom o,fj`'icaal Gounty records) sliall be subject to
the prowsiojrs of this sectlon, provided that wliere exl.sting structzires
or in7provements are situated so as to preclude installatron ojrequtred
landscaping, such required landscaprng may be waived by tjie
Plun,ring Drrector
See Staff Report, p 6, and testimony of John Pederson Zoning Code 14 806 040 estabhshes
requuements for penmeter landscapmg, depending on the zoning of the subject property and
surrounding properties and other factors Construing Zoning Code Chapters 14 806 and 14 $02
together, it is apparent that Zoning Code 14 806 020 (2) only appLes to the perimeter
landscaping requirements set forth in Zorung Code Chapter 14 806, and does not apply to the
landscaping requi.rements unposed on parlmg areas under Zorung Code 14 802 220
The appucability of the landscapmg standards set forth in Zorung Code 14 802 220 is
' controlled by Zoning Code 14 802 020, wluch provides as follows, in pemnent part
.4nv chanFe to a burlclcng, or anv chanQe in use of a buildinQ or srte to
sicch an extent tliat upermrt or Certifrcate of Occupancv is necessarvt
shall reatcire comnliQnce wrFh the nrovrstons contarned herecn All
requr? ecl parking areas shall be n:ade permanently available f ee of
charge to tjie cicstomers of the use on the site anrl marfitaifzed for parkrng
ptirposes orily No bTtlldtng permit shall be issued uyitrl plans showing
provrsionfor tlre requcred off-street parkrng have been submitted ac»d
approved Every lot or purcel of land or portron tlrereof used as a publrc
or prrliate parlting shall be developed and marntauied in accordat:ce witli
this sectron
[Emphasis added] Building pernut a.nd certificate of occupancy requirements are set forth in
Chapter 3 03 of the Spokane County Code (SCC), and in portions af the Umform Building Code
(UBC) adopted under Chapter 3 01 of the UBC SCC 3 03 020 states, pursuant to UBC 109 1,
that a builduag permit is required from the County to " erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
n.iove, improve, remove, eonvert, demolish, use or occupy any building or structure except
for certain minor exceptions listed under UBC 106 2
IIE Findmgs, Conclusaons and Decision ZE-1 8A-89 Page 7
i
SCC 3 03 021 (c) requues a"change in use" permit for all occupancy or use changes, in
order to determine whether a new use will be impacted by vanous codes or ordinances in effect
UBC 109 1 rcquires the issuance of a cerhficate of occupancy before any building or structure is
occupied or used, and before any change in the existing occupancy classification of a buildang or
struchire or portion thereof Thus requireruent does not apply to "Group R, Division 3"
(residential) occupancies, or to "Group M" (mercantile) occupancies Group M occupaneies
include occupancies used for the sale and display of inerchmidise, and involving the stocks of
goods, wares or merchandise incidental to such purpose and accessible to the pubUc This
includes such uses as department stores, drug stores, shoppuag cenYers, and wholesale-and retail
stores See UBC 309 1
UBC 109 2 and 3405 requue the issuance of a cerhf cate of occupancy for clianges in the
character of occupancy or use of a building which would place the budding in a different dlvision
of the same group of occupancy or in a different group of occupancies. It is not clear to the
Examiner whether the exception to the certificate of occupancy reqwrement Ilsted in UBC 109 1,
applicable to residential and mercantile occupations, applies to the requurements stated in UBC
109 2 and 3405 However, SCC 3 03 021 (c) provldes that, in addition to the requuements of
UBC 3405, a certlficate of occupancy may be required when the occupancy or use changes "
to the extent that dlfferent zoning or other county code requLrernents such as, but not Iunited to
parking standards, ASA Overlay Zone requirements, 208 requirements, etc, apply "
The site development plan dated 1-1-98 and the apphcant's descnption of the proposal
md.icate that sigruficant port-ions of the exishng shopping center will be remodeled or removed,
and new buildings and uses constructed or located on the site Many of such developxnent
achvities would require the issuance of a building permit under the above-stated provisions of tbe
County Code and the UBC A certificate of occupancy may be reqtured for some of these
activities or other changes planned for the site
The applicant indicated that it was wiUing to cornply with the landscaping requirements of
the Zoning Code only in the "newly developed areas" of the site, includmg the area of the site
lying west of Dartmouth Road and the area lyYng south of tlic existing shopping center Thts
would not include the existing parlung areas located north of the existmg mall, the parking lot for
the new Rosauer's store, or the parlang area lying between the ex.isting mall (old Lamont's store)
and Dartmouth Road This excluded area represents about 50 % of the site See teshmony of
Gary Bernardo, and aenal photo marked as Exhibit E The applicant's resistance to landscaping
the entire site is based on the cost and mconvenience associated with teanng up the existtng
paving in these areas and instaUing new landscaping, and possibly the loss of some parktng
spaces However, ZonLng Code 14 802 020 appears to requu-e that all parking areas associated
with a building or use on the site which is being changed in use or strucfiure, wlvch change
reyu.ires the issuance of erther a building permit or a certificate of occupancy from the County,
must be brought into compliance with ihe pariong landscaping standards of Zoning Code
14 802 220 Since the applicaxit did not request a vanance from these standards, the Examiner
has no power to waive the landscaping requirements
The precise applacation of che landscaping requirements of Zoning Code 14 802 220 to site
development canriot be deterrnined by the Examiner, since it depends on whether a building
perrnit or certzficate af occupancy is needed for partic«lar changes in bulldings and uses on the
site The determinahon is also made difficult by the fact that many buildings on the site are
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Paoe 8
i
enclosed in a mall, and that some parking is shared between uses ApplicaUon of the landscaping
requirements can be made on a piecemeal basis, as building permits or certi.ficates of occupancy
are applied for and issued The applicant and County staffcould also agree to look at the overall
development plan or a partYCUlar phase of developcnent, and with the provision of more specific
ynformanon on the proposed site improvements by the apphcant, the landscaping requirements
could be applled to the entue site or the particular phase
In summary, the Examiner fmds no basis for lir.nlting apphcation of the landscaping
requuements as requested by the appl2cant Zorung Code 14 802 000 lays out xhe purpose and
intent of the off-street parkung requuements of Zorung Code Chapter 14 802, which include the
provision of an aesthehcally pleasing parlang facility The policies of the Major Commereial
category of the Comprehensive Plan promote ihe provision of aesthetics for comJnercial
development along county artenals, through the County's adoption and unplementation of
landscaping standards See Comprehensive Plan, Decislon Guidehnes 61.1 and G 13, and
discussion under "Charactenshc Features" on p 90, and Comprehensive Plan policies set forth
on page 4-5 of the Staff Report The Urban eategory states that landscaping may be requu-ed to
provide a healthful and pleasmg ennronment Decision Gwdeline 15 2
The applicant also requested that the performance bond requuement for landscaping be
deleted from County Planrung Department cond2tion #9 in the HEC's 1989 zoning decision The
Division of Bu.ildsng and Planning proposed an alternarive to the condiUon, which would allow ~
"other suitable guarantee" to be substituted for the perfonnance bond Zonmg Code 14 806 120
(2) states that the Planning Department may reqiure performance bonds " or other appropnate -
secunty, wcluding letter of credit, to ensure that ]andscaping will be mstalled and mamtamed for
one year, according to tbe approved plans and specificanons" Zoning Code 14 802 220 (11)
states that bonci.ing " and other secunty may be required of an applicant to ensure that the
landscaping requirements herein are met" The Division of Buildmg and Planrung revision to the
condition is consistent with these provisions, wlule the applicant's requested deletion depnves
the Division of its authonty under these provisions to require secunty for landscaping
requirements
3. "208" drainaee reouirements
The apphcant requested deletion or revision of certazn HEC conditions relating to the
installation of "208" drainage for the 1989 redevelopment proposal See Exhibit D Tbe
applicant requested revision of HEC condition #S and Plantung Department condition n6, to lunrt
comphance with "208" drainage standards to the newly developed areas of the site instead of the
entire site The Staff Report on pages 6-7 recommends that such condition not be revised, based
on County Resolution No 80-1592 The Exammer notes that County Resoluhon No 80-1592
has been amzizded by County Resolution Nos 81-0726 and 95-0498 The drainage provlsions m
such resolution are codified under Chapter 9 14 of the County Code Chapler 9 14 of the County
Code estabhshes drainage standards and requires the submittal and approval of drauiage plans in
conformance with such standards for vanous types of land use achons This includes compliance
with the Cou»ty's adopted "Guidelines for Stormwater Management", which set forth the subject
4LC 208" drainage standards
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 9
~
SCC 9 14 020 reqwres all persons applying for permits or approvals for perriuts and/or
final approvals to submit dramage plans to the County Engineer for approval, wtuch plans must
comply with the "208" drainage standards set forth in SCC Chapter 9 14 and t.he Guideiuies for
Stormwater Management SCC 9 14 020, without limltation, llsts a number of land use actions
which require the submittal of drainage plans, including, in relevant part, rezones and also
"[b]uilding pernuts for new construchon or_substantial improvement" "Substantial
unprovement" is defined to mean " any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure,
the cost of which exceEds fifly percent of the market value of the structure either (A) before the
unprovement or repair is started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged and is being re,storcd,
before the damage occurrecl " See SCC 9 14 020 (4) and (7)
The Zoning Code also addresses "208" requirements in ceriain relevant places Zoning
Code 14 802 080 requues that al l pavmg and hard surfacing on ar site provide for proper storm
drainage, as defined in the County's Guidelines for Stormwater Management Zonmg Code
14 802 080 and 14 802 220 (6-7,10) requue considerahon of "208" dralnage requuements in the
installahon of landscaping and other facibties in parktng facilities The application of these
requirements to the proposal is controlled by Zomng Code 14 802 020, the scope of wluch was
discussed previously and does not inciude reliance on the "50%" rule set forth m SCC 9 14 020
(7) Zorung Code 14 100 106 mdicates that whenever provisions of the Zorung Code and other
land development regulations overlap or conflict, the more restnctive provis2ons sha11 govern and
the provisions of the Zorung Code must be met as a minimum The Examiner also notes that
Chapter 14 802 of the Zorung Code is addressed specifically to "208" drainage requirements for
parlung areas, wlule SCC 9 14 020 has a mare general applicahon
The Division of Building and Planning contended that the entUe site must comply with
"208" drainage standards, on the basis that redevelopment of the site would exceed SO% of tbe
assessed value of the property See Staff Report on p 6-7, testimony of John Pederson, and letter
dated 1-1-97 from Stacy Bjordahl to Gary Bernardo Pursuant to a memo dated 1Vlarcb 24, 1998,
the County Stoi-mwater Utility, adrmnistered by the County Division of Utilitics, requested that
the entire stte be brought up to "208" standards, based on the "50% rule" See memo dated 3-24-
98 from Brenda Suns and Kaihenne Mlller to Stacy Bjordahl Pursuant to a later memo dated
Apnl 16, 1998, both the Stormwater Utility and County Development Services (part of the
County Division of Engineenng and Roads) requested that the applicant's Proposal to Iymrt the
application of "208" drainage requirements to the newly developed azeas of the site be denled
The memo requestecl that, " to the extent practical the exisUng hard surface areas on the
site be required to drain to grassed percolation ("208") swales See memo dated 4-16-98 from
Brenda,Sims/Kathenne Miller and Bill Hemmings to Louis Webster, and memo dated 3-11-98
&om Bill Hemmings to Louis Webster Thc Apnl 16, 1988 mcmo stated the following rarionale
for such request, in pertinent part
The proposed area covers approxYmately SO acres withrn the AtJurfer
Sensitrve Area 7'hts ts a relattvely large area in an envrronmenl k-nown to
pi oduce low qccallty ru»off due to the ofteri heavy ti affic ui parkrng lots
and the srcbsequetzt bucldup ojpolhutants between storm events Eve ,ry
opportunity iaeeds to be taken to reduce the amotint of ruyiofj''drrectly
rtyected to llze Aqucfe► fra» srtes llke tjrrs A site this size with a 90%
rmpervloirs ureu coverage tivozrlcl reqictre ahotit fottr act es of ttrfiltratron
aten for treattng stof mwater At tJrrs coverage tJlere is more lhan enough
HE Findings, Conclusions and Declsion ZE-18A-89 Page 10
/
space to treat ul! of the runo, fj`'fro»i the srte Ustng some innovative destgt2
ai7 eveir l:igher coverage could be obtained whtle strl! inf ltratrrrg all of tjie
runoff per tjie County design criterra
The appllcaxit tesh'fied that the County Publlc Works Duector, Denius Scott, had previously
advised the applicant that it would not have to install "208" drainage for the existrng parking lot
that would serve the new Rosauer's store See testimony of Gary Bernardo The record includes
a letter dated Apn19, 1998 from David Peterson of B& B Real Estate to Denrus Scott, regarding
tlvs representahon The letter requested that the County not require 208 dramage swales for the
new Rosauers pariong lot under an interpretation of the "50% rule", and that the value of the new
Rosauers store improvement not be counted toward the applicaUon of the 50% rule, based on
certam considerations set fortti in the letter The letter is slgned by Dennis Scott with the words
"o k" and a date of "4-9-98". The Examiner takes notice that the County Public Works Director
oversees a11 County departments dealing with land development, includmg the Division of
Buslding and Plaruung, the Division of Enguieenng and Roads, and the Division of Utihties
The Hearmg Examiner finds some weaknesses with this possible admimstrative decision,
since it appears inconsistent with then appIicable conditions of approval attached to the HEC's
1989 admi.nistrarive decision, and does not take into account the applycablbty reqturements of
Zoning Code 14 802 020, wluch wouid appear to requlre that "208" be installed zn the new store .
parking lot in the manner specified in Zorung Code 14 802 080 Further, even if the 50% rule
stated in SCC 9.14 020 was appUcable to the required parkmg lot landscapwg, the ratlonale
stated in the Apn19, 1998 letter appeazs to misapply the 50% rule. The deternunation should -
arguably either 1) compare the current assessed value of the structures being demolished or
remodeled for the new store to the cost of the new Rosauer's store and any remodeled structures,
2) compare the cw-rent assessed value of all the ex2sting structural improvements to the estYmated
cost of remodeling and new construchon proposed by the 1-1-98 site plan, or 3) compare the
value of the structures to be reFnoved/remodeled in a particular phase that includes the new store
versus the cost of constructing and remodeling for the phase The new Rosauer's store and the
structures removed/remodeled for such store could logically have been considered separately
&om the remainder of the sYte improvements, since the site plan and BSP-56-97 pFOposes the
creation of a new and separate parcel for such use, and the new Rosauer's store represents a
separate phase of development
The applicant's arctutect/agent, Gary Bernardo, contended that it would impractical to
upgrade the northerly half of the site for "208" drainage, indicafing that the existing buildings
east of Dartmouth Road sat at a lower elevation than Sprague Avenue, which feature would
cause drainage water to flow toward the buildwgs Bernardo exglained that erther piping would
have to be installed to pump the draanage to low areas located on the site, or that the existing
parkuig areas would have to be torn up and bulk graded to allow water to flow toward Sprague
Avenue, witil a retainwg wall installed along Sprague Avenue Bemardo fi.uther commented thai
under the 1-1-95 site plan the unpervious areas on tbe nortli side of the site would actually be
decreased somev►rhat.
File Nos ZE-18-89/ZE-50A-87/VE-38-89 contain a dramage analysis for the shopping
mall expansioii planned for the site in 1989, using a site pian that preceded fihe July 25, 1959 site
plan by a few months See Drainage Analysis for Universrty City Shoppulg Mall Expansion
prepared June 7, 1989 by Taylor Engineenng, Inc The draulage analysis states that all
HE F►ndings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 11
1
stonnwater precipitahon onginating on the project and all stormwater draining to the project
would be collected and diverted to on-site "208" cirainage percolation areas with drywells This
would include the installation of a piping system to accommodate drainage from the roofs of new
bu.ildi.ngs mstalled, wluch would convey drainage to grassed swales located elsewhere on site,
the use of exisfiing drywells to handle drainage from the roofs of existing bwldings which were
being modified only sughtly, and the drai.nage of exishng and new parking areas to grassed
swales located adjacent to such parking areas The drainage plan includes a map showing "208"
storni drainage swales along most of the northerly boundanes of the site, along the entire easterly
boundary and along portions of the south houndary of'the site The drainage plan supports the
general feasibility of providmg "208" drainage for the current project
In summary, the Examiner sees no basis for moWying the HEC condrtions regardmg "208"
drainage, wluch means the project would be requued to comply with the landscaping
requuements of the Zoning Code to the extent they are appllcable to the site under Zonmg Code
Chapter 14 802, and to the extent they are apphcable under other land use regulations The
policies of the Major Commercial category, wluch may be applled to the entire site under the
"transition pohcy" stated i.n the Comprehensive Plan, encourage adequate stormwater control in
compliance with adopted policies, plans and regulahons for lands developed for commercial
uses See Comprehensive Plan, Decision Guidelines 6 15 and 6 1 6, and see discussion under
"Transrtion Area" on p 11 of the introduction to the Comprehensive Plan and definihon of
"transitlonal areas" in the glossary of the Comprehensive Plan The HEC m its 1989 decision
found that approval of the 1989 redevelopment proposal would enhance the environment and its
_ aestherics by reqvinng compliance with "208" stormwater regulations and unposing landscaping
standaxds, among other condttions of approval See HEC findings #10 (h).
The appltcation of the adopted dramage requirements to indivldual changes in use or
buildings on the site, reqwnng erther a, building permit or certificate of occupaUon, would be
determtned by County admimstrative staff at such as the changes are ready to be made There is
insufficient inforniation for the Hearing Examiner to make such determinarion for the entue site
or redevelopment project Conceivably, a dra.inage plan for the entire site or for a part►cular
phase of development could be determined by County staff at such tinle as a more defimte site
plan has been subnutted by the applicant for the wbole site or for a panccular phase The County
will have to deternune if a binding administrarive declsion has been made regarding the
application of "208" requirements to the parkulg lot for the new Rosauer's store, based on the
Apnl 9, 1998 letter from David Peterson to Dennus Scott referenced above
4 Simaee
The applicant requested that the special signing requirements for the 1989 redevelopment
project stated in HEC condition #10 be deleted, and that signage be as allowed in the B-3 zone
" with separate calculations for Sprague, Uruversity and the Valley Couplet frontage " See
Exhibit C In making these requests, the applicant contended that the reduced signage ordered by
the HEC in 1989 was appropnate for the regional mall contemplated in the 1989 redevelopment
plan, but was not appropnate for the commuruty-based mall being proposed, wluch included
several retail pads located outside a mal] seMing The applicant argued lhat B-3 zone signage
was needed to compete wit}i other B-3 users located along Sprague Avenue wh.ich already had
such signage, and that national retailers and other users such as banks, convenience stores and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 12
t
gas stations which would be attracted to the site would want such signage See Exhibit C, and
testsmony of Gary Bernardo and David Peterson
The applicant a.lso offered testimony that signage along both Sprague Avenue and Second
Avenue (south leg of Valley Couplet) was needed, since some users would be onented toward
traffic from either or both artenals, and because the County would be negaMvely impacting traffic
volumes passuag the site along Sprague Avenue by making it a one-way street 1'he apphcant
also poi.nted out that signage was already provided along Llniversity Road for the Rosauer's store
and the Taco Bell outlet, and that signage along both ~Sprague Avenue and the south leg of the
proposed Valley couplet were cntical for University City uses to be able to compete See Exhibit
C, and testunony of Gary Bernardo and Dav1d Peterson
County staff requested that HEC condinon #10 not be changed, on the basis that extensive
signage already existed in the area, that allowmg signage based on the Zoning Code would
sunply extend compeuhve "sight polluhon" along the artenals abutting the s1te, that a large
number of &eestanduig signs on the site were not desuable, and that Sprague Avenue and Second
Avenue should not both be used to compute frontacre and sign area. County staff cited the
example of Division Street as an example of excessive sight polluhon, and pointed to the
Wandermere shoppi.ng mall as an example of a successful commwuty mall without excesstve
signage See Staff Report, p 6, and testimony of Lows Webster and John Pederson The
Exammer notes that the County Planrung Deparhnent cited simi lar concerns in recommending
restncted signage for the 1989 redevelopment proposal See page A-10 of staffreport dated 8-
24-89 in File Nos ZE-18-89/ZE 50A-87NE-38-89 _
The Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, whzch applies to the northerly
90% of the site, encourages the provision of aesthetic stand3rds of physical development along
county artenai nghis of way, including a pleasing aesthetically pleasing view as seen by the
travehng public and adjacent landowners when deveIopeti with commercial uses Such category
recommends fihe development of standards regarding landscaping, signage, storage and
arctvtectural treatment for uses along these nghts of way Comprehensive Plan, Decision
Gwdelines 6 1 2 and 6.1. 3 The southerly 10% of the site and the land lymg south of the site are
designated withu.n the Urban category of tlie Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate
major commercial users See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, discussion under "Detailed
Definiuon" and "Incompauble Uses" The transitton policy allows considerabon of the project
under the policies of the Malor Commercial category as well as the Urban category pollcies,
depending on the extent to which the project mtrudes into the Urban category and the land use
effects on the uses wathin such category See discussion under "Transition Area" on p 11 of the
introduction to the Comprehensive Plan and de#'i.nition of "transitional areas" in the glossary of
the Comprehensive Plan The land lying south of the easterly third or half of the site, south of
the proposed Valley couplet,ls vacant and zoned B-3, while the land 1}nng south of the
remalnder of the slte and the south leg of the Valley couplet is zoned UR-3 5 and lncludes vacant
land or single-Family residences See StaffReport, p 1 and zoning maps in file
Chapter 14 804 of the Zoni.ng Code adopts comprehensive signage standards for vanous
uses and zones The panccular signage standards for the B-3 zone are set,forth m Section
14 804 120, and apply differently to individual bus»ess sites and "mulciple business complexes"
A"multiple business complex" is defined by the Zonulg Code to mean a" group of structures,
or a single structure, wtth dividing walls and separate entrances for each busmess, liousing at
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 13
t
least two (2) retail businesses; offices, commercial ventures or independent or separate parts of a
business wluch share the same lot, access and/or parlcing facrLties " See Zoning Code
14 300 100 The requirements for "attached" or "wall" signs are Lstcd under Zoning Code
14 804 120, and depend on the amount of "frontage" the site has on public rights of way "Lot
frontage" or "&ontage" is defined under Zoning Code 14 340 100 as the length of that portion of
a lot abutting the public street " providing pnncipal access to the lot"
HEC conditton ##10 restricts "detacbed" or "freestanding" signs on the site to one sign
along University Road, one sign along the county nght of way to, the south and two slgns along
Sprague Avenue, and further ]units such slgns to 250 square Feet in surface area and 40 feet ln
height above grade Zoning Code 14 804 120 (2) restncts freestanding signs for "mulhple
business complexes" to no more than two (2) square feet per luieal foot of "frontage" along a
street up to a maximum of 250 square feet in sign area; and up to a maximum height of 40 feet
above grade One additional sign of such,rype is pernutted for each 200 feet of "frontage" or
portion thereof that is above the ongina1200 feet For individual bwlduig sites with lot frontages
exceeding 200 feet, Zoning Code 14 804 120 (c) aufhonzes freestanding signs wluch may not
exceed two square per lineal feet of street Crontage up to a maxnmum of 200 square feet in sign
area, which signs are not more than 35 feet above grade, and wtuch have no more than one such
sign for each 200 feet of street frontage or portion thereof
-The parties provided little guidance to the Heanng Examiner on what the true impacts
would be &om allowing signage for the project based on thc Zoning Code, and aUowing
businesses with mulhple frontages along Sprague Avenue, University Road and the south leg of
the Valley couplet to count all frontages to determine allowable signage under the Zorung Code
The July 25, 1989 site development plan associated with the HEC's 1989 decision illustrated one
large mall complex which housed all the major retailers, mall shops and cinema, along with three
(3) mdependent buiiding pads The four (4) detached signs allowed by HEC condition #10
would have allowed one detached sign for the mall complex and one detached sign for each
independent retail pad illustrated on the 1989 site plan The 1-1-98 site plan for the current
proposal shows one (1) complex of three major relailers and two (2) indsvidual building pads
located west ofDartmouth Road, the new Rosauer's buflding site, a stand-alone restaurant, a
stand-alone hre store, a complex of shops located bellveen the Rosauer's store and Major Retailer
#2, the enclosed mall complex, and six (6) other indivtdual bwldllsg pads scattered around the
srte This represents a total of 14 separate building complexes and indlvidual buildmg sites on
the subject property, or arguably the need for up to 14 detached sigas
The total frontage for the site along public roads is estunated by the Heanng Examrner
from the 1-1-98 site plan to be about 4,250 feet, which divided by 200 feet per sigzi represenfis a
maxi.n.lum potential allowance af about 21 freestanding signs on the premises This number of
signs may not be allowed under the Zonmg Code since the entire public road frontage around the
site cannot necessanly be clatmed as ptovidmg pnacipal access to the businesses on the
premises Companng this number with the number of individual businesses and complexes on
the srte, the Heanng Examuier finds no compelling rationale for erther retaining HEC condition
#10, or for granting the applicant's request that the frontage of a lot along all fronting streets be
counted for the purpose of computing fTOntage and sign area The Exanuner has no authonty to
authonze more signage than the signage standards of the B-3 zone allow, since an application for
a sign vanance was not submitted
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-1 8A-89 Page 14
l
The inclusion of multiple frontages in the signage calculation depends on the interpretation
of the term "£rontage" The defirution of "lot frontage" ("frontage") under Zoning Cade
] 4 300 100 suggests that a bulldmg site may have only one pnncipal access for thc purpose of
calculating signage allowances under Zonmg Code 14 804 120, based on the amount of frontage
along a public nght of way County Dlvision of Building and Plannmg staff has, no doubt, made
prevlous interpretations on tbis issue, smce there are otlier commercial sites in cbe unincorporated
area wlth double frontages, even along one-way street couplets (e g Argonne/Mullan Roads)
Further, there is insufficient informaUon in the record to determine signage allowances under the
Zoning Code for the individual businesses or complexes illustrated on the si[e pla.n Signage will
be allowed for the site in accordance with the Zorvng Code, as lawfully interpreted by the
County Admirustraiive interpretalaons are appealable to the Heanng Examiner The Examiner
finds no justification for allowing the project more signage than the Zoning Code allows,
balancing aesthetic concerns versus the appLcant's stated needs for signage
5 Submittal of "master develonmEnt nlan" or revised slte ulan
The applicant at the public heanng requested that the site plan dated 1-1-98 serve as the
"Master Development Plan" required by HEC condiuon #4 County staff tesUfied that such plan
was adequate to serve as a concept plan for the purpose of current Bwldjng and Plannmg
condifiion #4, provided the disclaimer on the site plan was removed This was acceptable to the
applicant See testimony of Louis Webster and Gary~ Bernardo County staff also testi-fied that
the site pla.n was not adequate to make certam determtnations, such as the amount of required
parkulg for the project and signage requirements The Exanuner has modified theconditions of
approval to address these issues
6 Roads
The 1-1-98 site plan contemplates the vacahon of Dartmouth Road, as provided i.n current
Divlsion of Engineenng and Roads condhtion #1 to the HEC's decision Such vacarion is
opposed by both County Engineenng and Spokane County Fire Distnct No 1, for mentonous
reasons See letter dated 4-14-98 from Fire Chief Pat Humphnes to Lows Webster, testunony of
Lany Herberholz, concLtion #2 of Englneer's Condations of Approval (4-16-98), and test.imony
of Scott Engelhard Durulg the public heanng, County Engineenng agreed to revise current
Division of Engineenng and Roads conditYOn #2, to reflect that negotiations are under way with
the apphcant for the County's acquYSition of nght of way for Dartmouth Road and the south leg
of the Valley Couplet, rather than flatly umposing a dedicahon requirement for such nghts of
way See testimony of Scott Engelhard The applicant mdicated thai negohahons with County
Engineering for such nghts of way were gomg well See testimony of CCary Bemardo The
Examiner has adopted the rev►sed County Engmeenng condihon reflected .in Exhibit A The
Exammer has also deleted County Engineering Department condihon #1 to the HEC's 1989
decision County Engineenng did not oppose any of the applicant's requests to delete certain
County Engineeruig Department conditions attached to the HEC's decision, as stated in
Attachment #1 to the application.
HE Findnags, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 15
C
7 Consistencv vvith nublic health, safety and general welfare, compliance with the
SDokane Countv Zonine Code and other apvlicable development rep-ulatYOns
Based on the above analysis, the Examiner finds that the proposal, as condihoned,
generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, and the purpose and i.ntent set forth for the
Regional Business (B-3) zone in Zoning Code 14 628 100 The site plan dated 1-1-98 is a
conceptual plan and does not necessarily reflect compliance with the 2oning Code and all
applicable regulations There are outstanding issues relating to application of landscapLng,
drainage, s2gnage, etc reqLUrements to pamcular site development which cannot be fully
resolvcd without more information The Examiner has provided some guidance herein in
interpreting the applicable code reqwrements These application issues wlll need to be resolved
before the issuance of a building permit or certi-ficate of occupancy if required See Zorung Code
Chapters 14 408 and 14 410 However, the proposal is conditioned for comphance with the B-3
zone, applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, and other applicable regulations As
condihoned, tlae Examiner finds the proposed change of condihons to be m compLance with the
development standards of the B-3 zone, other applicable provisions of the Zoiung Code, and
applscable development regulahons
The appLcant did not oppose any of the conditions of approval recommended by County
departments and public agencies, except as noted The Examiner has ehminated some of the
HEC condihons because they are redundant of currently proposed conditions, superseded, or
replaced by other condifiions The Staff Report on page 6 observes that the legal descnption of
the property has changed since the HEC's 1989 zonuig decision The Exammer agrees that the
HEC's 1989 declsion continues to apply to the Taco Bell mte (parcel #45201 0110) located at the
southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and Umversity Road, since such parcei was included ln the
1989 present zonuig action However, the Staff Report incorrectly cancludes that the parcel of
land located at the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartmouth Road (parcel
#45201 0311 ) was part of the HEC's 1989 zonuig acUons and is aff'ected by the HEC's 1989
decision The legal descnptYOn contained in County Plannmg Department condihon #1 to the
HEC's 1989 decision does not include these parcel, nor do the maps of the site contained in the
staff report dated August 24, 1989 for the 1989 proposal include such parcel Further, the dotted
iines delineating the subject property on the site plan dated 7-25-89 do not include such parcel
8 The nrooosal. as conditioned, comnlies with the provisions of the State Environmental
PoLcv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance
The procedural requirements of chapter 43 21 C RCW and chapter 11 10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met The Heanng Examiner concurs with the Deternunation of
Nonsignlficance (DNS) issued by lhe Division of Builcimg and Planning No publlc agency
requested wlthdravval or modYfication of the DNS The current zorung actton will not have more
than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 16
c
III. DECASION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a change
of conditions is hereby approved in part, subject to the conditions of the vanous public agencies
specified below, and demed in part, as follows
1. The following conditions of approval attached to the Spokane County Hean.ng Exammer
Commiriee (HEC) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order dated August 25, 1989 in File Nos
ZE-18-89/ZE-SOA-87/VE-38-89 are hereby retained and shall be appued to the change of
condihons HEC condihons #3, 6-8 and 11, County 1'lammng Department conditions #4-6, aU
County Building and Safety Department conditions, and all Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority condiuons
2 The foUowing condztions of approval attached to the Spokane County Heanng Examiner
Committee (HEC) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order dated August 25, 1989 in File Nos
ZE-18=89/ZE-50A-87NE-38-89 are hereby deleted and do not apply to the apphcation HEC
cond.itions # 1-2, 4-5, 9- l 0, County Planrung Department conditions # 1-3, 7-9, and all County
Engtneenng Department, County QtiliUes Departiment, County Health Disinct and Water
Purveyor conditions
3 The following additional conditions of appxoval are imposed, with condlhons added or ~
siguficantly revlsed by the Heanng Examuiet itolicued
-
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1 All conditions imposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicaat",
wluch tenn shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors
2 The Change of ConcLbons applies to the followmg real property
That portion of Short Plat No SP-1019-95 and that pomon of the Plat of Qpportun.ity, as
per Plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, 21, 22 and 23 in the Northeast quarter of
Section 20, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington, being more
particularly descnbed as follows
Beginning on the South nght of way hne of Sprague Av3enue at the Northwest corner of
Lot "B" of Short Plat No SP-1019-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85,
Spokane County, Washington, thence S 02° 30' 34" E, along the West line of said Lot "B",
160 09 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot `B", thence N87° 09' 35" E, along he South
luie of saxd Lot "B", 126 56 feet to the Southeast comer of said Lot "B" and the West nght of
way line of University Road, thence S 02° 30' 34" E, along said West nght of way line, 559 62
feet to the cenfierLne of proposed 2'dAvenue, thence S 84° 45' 03" W, along the proposed
centerline of 2nQ Avenue, 203 74 feet to the beginnuig of a curve to thel left the radtus of which
bears S 45° 14' 57" E, a distance of 700 00 feet, thence along said proposed centerline and
curve to the left, through a central angle of 16° 15' 08", an arc distance of 198 56 feet to a point
of tangency, thence S 68° 29' 55" W, along sald proposed centerline, 393 88 feet to the
beginning of a curve to the nght the radius of which bears N 21° 30' OS" W, a distanee of
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 17
1
700 00 feet, thence along said proposed centerllne and curve to the right, through a central angle
of 18° 39' 41 an arc distance of 227 99 feet to a point of tan$ency, thence S 87° 09' 36" W,
along said proposed centerlme, 646 08 feet to the begirunng of a curve to the nght the radius of
which bears N 02° 50' 24" W, a distance of 1000 00 feet, tbence along said proposed centerline
and curve to the nght, through a ccntral angle of 15° 51' 28", an arc distance 276 77 feet to a
point of tangency, thence N 76° 58' 56" W, along said proposed centerline, 339 14 feet, to the
projected East nght of way line of Walnut Road, thence N 02° 30' 34" W, along said East nght
of way line, 596 55 feet to the South line of the North 200 00 feet of Tracts 224 a.rid 223 of said
Plat of Opportumty, thence N 87° 09' 35" E, along said South line, 503 80 feet to the West
nght of way line of Dartmouth Road, thence N 02° 30' 34" W, along said West nght of way
hne, 200 00 feet to the South right of way line of Sprague Avenue, thence N 870 09' 35" E,
along said South right of way line, 1610 04 feet to the Poini of BegLmmng
3 Tlie proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone afid the Spokane Cozcnty
Zoning Cocle, as amended
4 The applicant shall develop the subject-property generally in accordance with the srte
development plan submitted on January I, 1998, »ohvithstandirrg the disclar»ier set forth on the
stte plan, and conltngent on compltance wcth all conditions of approval and applrcable
regulatioyis Vanations, when approved by the Division Director/deslgnee, may be permitted,
including, but not limuteci to building location, landscape plans and general allowabte uses of the
perrmtted zone All variattons must conform to regulations set forth m the Spokane County
Zonrng Code, and the onginal iatent of the developmenl plans shall be maintauned The Dcvcsion
Darector/desigrree may reqrctre the subniittal of a»iore specific site development plan prtor to
rssuance of bucld,ng permlts, iri order to venfy compliance wrtjt the contlctroirs of approval or
apphcable regzslatrons
5 Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighttng and sigmng
plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building perinits
6 A specific landscape plan, planhng scbedule and provisions for mawtenance acceptable to
the Division Directorldeszgnee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable
guarantee for the project pnor to release ofbuilding perreuts Landscaping sha11 be installed and
maintatned so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired
7 Direct Ilght from any eYtenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
8 The Division of Building & Plaruiing shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting fhat the property in yuestion is subject to a vanety of special
conditions uiiposed as a result of approval of a land use action This ?itle Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in questcon The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and sha11 only be
released, in full or in part, by the Divi`sion of Building & Planning The Title Nohce shall
generally provlde as follows
The parcel of property legally descnbed as (descnbed above in condition no 2) is the subject of a
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 18
~
land use action by the Spokane Counfiy Heanng Examiner on Apn129, 1998, tmposing a vanety
ofspecial development condihons File No ZE-18A 89 is available for inspection and copying
m the Spokane County Division of Buildirig & Plarln,.ng
9 Any divesion of land for tt:e purpose of sale, lease or transfer shall contply wtth chapter
5817 RCW andlor the Spokane County Saibttivastort Ordi►tance prror to the rssuance of buildtng
pennrts
10 Sagnage shall be allowecl as per»irtted in tlze Regronal Busr»ess (B-3) zone
.4
SPOKANE COUNTY DTVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Pnor to issuance of a building permit or at the request oFthe County Engineer in conjunctton
with a County Road Project/Road Improvement nistrict, whichever comes fitst
1 The applicant shall deliver for acceptance by the County Enpneer a clear and
unencumbered nght-of-way deed for University Road which was constructed in conjunction with
CRP #2298
2 The apphcant and Spokane County are currently negobatYng the reqwred ngbt-of-way for
the Valley Couplet and Dartmouth Road as shawn on the adopted nght-of-way Plan for County
Road Project No 2396 A copy of the approved plan ts attacjied as "E.Yhibct A" to the
Engtneer's Condrttons of Approval dated Aprtl 16, 1998 cn the project f le for the applicatioti,
arirl rs hereby tncorporated by reference herein
3 Access pemuts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtamed from the
County Engineer The accesses rllustrated o» the site development plan dated 1-1-98 have not
been approved
4 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engvaeer drainage and access
plans
5 The applicanc shall submit for approval by 1he Spokane County Engi.neer and the Spokane
County Heaitli Distnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water
disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is pbased
b A parking plan and traffic cuculation plan sha11 be submitted and approved by tbe Spokane
Cotx.nty Engi.neer The design, Iocahon and arrangement of parlang stalls shall be m accordance
wath standard engineenng prachces Pavmg or surfacang as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any porhon of the proaect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
7 All requued unprovements shall conforin to the current State of VVashington Standard
SpecificaUons for Road and Bndge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaucung to Road Standards and Stonnwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
8 No dtrect access is allowed from lots to the Valley Couplet nght-of-way until the Valley
Cauplet is consiTUCted and established by the Board of County Comnussioners and an approach
HE Findings, Concluslons and DecisYOn ZE-18A-89 Page 19
!
pernut is issued by the County Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway seckions and drainage plan requuements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 95-0498 and chupter 914 of the
Spokane County Code and as amended mid are applicable to ttus proposal
10 No construchon work is to be performed within dle exishng or proposed nght of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road nght of way is
subject to inspectson and approval by the County Engineer
~
11 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilihes either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, mcluding property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obllgahon for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utihhes The applicant should check with the applicable utilihes and Spokane
County Engineer to determuie whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
12 The apphcant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane Counfiy Standards
~POKAAIYE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1_ Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utihties, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Uhhties, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing pubLc water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane),, State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project and indivldual service will be
provided to each buildmg
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is protubited
SPOKAN]E COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 Apphcant shall submit expressly to Spokane Councy Division of Utilihes "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connechon and facilrties for review and approval
2 Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Uhlihes shall be submitted pnor to the issuance
of the sewer construction permit
3 Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made pnor to issuance of
seNver connection pernut Sewer charges may include special connechon charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 20
4 Any water service for this project shall be providcd in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended
5 A wet (hve) sewer connecUon to the area-wtde Public Sewex System as to be constructed
Sewer coruiection permit ls requued
SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY
1 Transit pullouts and room for passenger shelters should be provided along major artenals
witla associated sidewalks
2 Pedestnan pathways should be marked and clearly delmeated from the curb to mall entry
HE Findungs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 21
r
DATED tlus 19th day of June, 1998
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXA.MINER
i ~ 6_1~ ~ r
Michael C Dempsey, WSBA #8V5 I
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISI(JN ANID NOTICE OF RIGH'T TO APPEAL.
Pursuant to Spokane County Resoluhon No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner
on an application for a change of conditions apphcahon is final and conclusive unless within
twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party wtth standing
'files a land use petiuan in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter
36 70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three days after it is
m.ailed
Tlus Decision was mailed by Certi-fied Mail to the Apphcant on June 19, 1998 The date of
issuance of the Heanng Exammer's decision is therefore June 22, 1998, THE LAST DAY TOR
APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND [JSE PETITION IC
JTJI.Y 13.1998.
The complete record in tlus matter, including this decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod
with the Office of the Heanng Examiner, Third Floor, Pubhc Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway-Avenue, Spokane, Waslungton, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490 The file may be inspected
dunng normal worlang hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the
hours of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance
HE Findings, Conclusions and Declsion ZE-18A-89 Page 22
' EJEOE VED _
:
~ APR 2 ; 1998
NER
0tXAMI
iA. i STAFF REPORT TO THEErECOMY
File#: ZE-18A-88
DIVISION Of BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOKVSU; CMISM
HEARING DATE Apni 29, 1998 FILE ZE-18A-89
PROJECT PLANNER: Louis Webster, AICP
Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditrons to an existing Regionaf Business (B-3) (ZE-
18-89) zone to delete and/or modrfy certein Division of Buiidmg and
Planning and Division of Engineenng Conddions of Approval
STAFF RECOMMENDATiON: Approval of some of the change of condrtions requested, as
condrtioned
Project Data
Project Location. South of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, west of
and adjacent to Urnversity Road in S20,T25, R44 E
W M, Spokane Courrty Washmgton
Rarcef tdumbers 45201 01 09, 45201 0210, 45201 0308, 45201 2304,
45201 0413, 45201 2305
Owner. Urnversity City Incorporated
c/o Goadale & 8erbien Co
209 W North River Dnve
Spokane, WA 99201
509-459-6100
Agent Gary Bemardo
Bemardo-Wi{is Architects
107 S Moward, Suite 420
Spokane. WA 99204
509-8384511
Compneftensive P1mn Oesignation: Malor Commerciat and Urban
Existing Zoning: Regional eusmess (e-3)
ExistiRg t.snd Use: University City ShoPPin9 Center
Surrounding Zon1ng and Lsnd Wsea• ,
• Norifi: Existmg zoning to the north rncludes Urban
Resrdential 22 (UR-22), Regional Busmess (B-3),
and Ideighbofiood Busmess (B-1) Land uses north
_ af the subjed property are commercaai
• South: Exisimg zornng to the south inciudes Urban
Residerrtiai-3 5(UR-3 5), Urban Residential-22 (UR-
22), and Re9ional Business (8-3) Land usss south
of the subject property are smgle family residences
and undeveloped
,
ZE-1aA-89
Staff Report - Aprl 29, 1998 Hearmg
1 of 8
• East: ExisUng zoning to the east mcludes Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22), and Regional Business (B-3)
Land uses east of the subject property are
~ commercial
• West Exisfing zoning to the west includes Regional
Business (B-3) Land uses west of the subject
property are commercial
Known Land Use Proposals and A zone reciassificaUon to Urban Residenbal-22~ (UR-
Recent Project Approvals in the 22) was approved in 1996 (flle #ZE-17-96) for 16
Area of this Project unds on 1 1 acres 1,000 feet south of the subject
property on Urnversity Avenue The same subject
- - property is subject of a prehminary 2 lot Bmdmg Site
Plan (file # BSP-56-97)
L-and Division Status• All six lots appear to be legal lots of record Tax
- - parce1-45201 0109 is lot "A" of Short Plat 95-1019
- ~ - All the parcels are porbons of the onginal plat ot
- - Opporfunity, recorded in 1908
Shoreline Designation: - Not Applicable
Water Purveyor._ , Modem Electric Water Company
Sewage Disposal• Spokane Counry Public Sewer System
Fire District _ Spokane County Fire District #1
School District -Central Valley School Distnct #356 =
Nearest Arterial and Distance: Sprague Avenue and UnNersity Road are principal
Artenals and are located north of and east of and
- ^ adjacent to the subject property The Artenal Road
Plan shows a Pnncipal Arterial, Controlled Access
High Capacity roadway (Valley Couplet) along the
southem property boundary Dedreation of Right of
Way is requested by the County Engmeer See
Engineer's Conditions of Approval dated 4-16-98
Nearest Parks and Distance. Balfour Park is located north across Sprague Avenue
Neighborttood Associahon• ~ None known
o This proposal is located inside the IUGA
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportabon Benefit Area (PTBA).
o This proposai is located outside the 1000' noLflcation boundary of designated Natural
Resource Lands.
GMA/Critical Areas
T
Aquifer Recharge Area. Subject property is located withm the
Prionty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensibve Area (ASA) Overiay Zone
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservabon Areas: None iliustrated on the Spokane County
Cntical Area Maps
Floodplain: Not Applicable
Geologicaily Haiardous• None iliustrated an the Spokane County
- Cribcal Area Maps
Wettands• None illustrated on the Spokane County
- Cnfical Area Maps or Wetiand Inventory
Maps
ZE-18A-89
Staff Report • Apni 29, 1998 Hearmg
2 of 8
p 4 ~g1 ~ ~w
' r
• S
SEPA
t
o ONS issued on 3-9-98 ,
o Comment period ended 3-24-98
Noticina
Published Spokesman Review on Apni 10, 1998
Maiiing and Site Posting Deadline: The deadiine for site posbng and mailing the Nobce of
Hearing to effected agencies and property owners/taxpayers of property located within 400 feet of
the subject property was Apnl 14, 1998
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete) 5-12-97
Technically Complete / Determinabon of Completeness issued 2-17-98
Date Notce of Decision is Due 6-17-98
Reviewinq_AQencies
13 Agencies were nobfied on 5-23-97 and 4-6-98 Comments were due on 6-12-97 and 416-98
-Agencies, Notified 'Response Date Agencies'NoUfied 1 1 iResponse-= - Date
lReceived Rec`eived
Spokane County Division Yes 4-16-98 Spokane Regional No '
of Engineering and Transportabon Council
Roads, Transportation
Spokane County Division Yes 3-11-98 5pokane Transit Yes 34-98
of Engmeenng, Authonty
Development Services
Spokane County Division Yes 6-10-97 Spokane County No
of Ublities-Sewer 4-13-98 Boundary Review Board
Spokane County Drvision Yes 3-24-98 Modem Electnc Water No
of Ublihes-Water Company
Resources
Spokane Regional Health Yes 6-12-97 Spokane County Parks, No
District Recreaton 8 Fair
Spokane County Division Yes 4-9-98 Central Valley School No
of Long Range Pianning Distnct No 356
Fire Distnct No 1 Yes 4-1496
4-16-98
Responses from the Pubiic.
No letters were received from adjacent property owners
Description of the Site
The site mvoives six Spokane County tax parcels, is largely developed and is known as the Unwersrty City
Shopping Center There are existing sidewalks along Sprague Avenue and University Road The site is flat
with very Irttle vegetation
BackQround
The Division of Building and Planning accepted the change of conditions application on June 12, 1997 and a
Determinabon of Completeness was issued on February 17, 1998 The majority of the subject property
consists of Lot "B" of the 2 lot short piat SP-95-1019 which was approved 2-6-96 The proposai is a change
ZE=18A-89
Staff Repart • Apnl 29, 1998 Heanng
3of8
♦ ~
to an approved change of conditions, zo4'e reclagsilicatiarl'and variance (flle #'s ZE-50-87, ZE-18-89, VE-' `
38-89) File ZE-18-89 was a zone reclassification that permitted the expansion/remodel of University
Shopping Center providing approximately 45(,000 square feet of additional retail area, cinema and food
court and the construction of parking structures The vanance was to allow for fewer parking spaces than
would have been required under the Zonmg Code File # BSP-56-97 is a two lot Binding Site Plan divESion
of the subject property which has received preliminary approval
Site Plan• '
The site plan of record dated 12-18-97 and date stamped "Received 1-1-98" shows existing and proposed
buildings and future building pads The subjeci property is largely devetoped as the Urnversity Cdy
Shopping Center and consists of 415 acres The development of the valley couplet along the southern
boundary of the subject property will dramahcally alter the site and traffic flow in and around the subject
property Eight points of ingress and egress to 2"d Avenue, three ingress and egress points to Urnversity
Road, and five ingress and egress points to Sprague Avenue are shown A Traffic Impact Assessment and
a Traffic Threshold Analysis were reviewed and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer The conclusion
of the Traffic Impact Analysis was no unacceptable impacts would result from the redevelopment The
conclusion of the Traffic Threshold Analysis was that Levels of Service would not drop to unacceptable
levels and increases m volume were acceptable The site plan indicates Dartmouth Road to be vacated and
or a pnvate drne The Fire District #1, in its letter dated 4-14-98, states that Dartmouth is cnbcal to their fire
suppression plan The Spokane County Engineer is requiring Dartmouth be dedicated to the County
Five feet of Type III landscaping is shown along Sprague Avenue. University Road and Second Avenue
Under Parking Information, 2383 parlung spaces are mdicated and 2388 spaces are indicated in the proJect
data table Actual required parking will be determmed dunng the dunng the buildmg permrt review process
and may vary with occupancy and type of tenants 208 drainage areas, typical budding setbacks and
pedestnan access to the STA bus transfer site south of subject property are also shown Five proposed
building pads along 2nd Avenue rangmg is size from 2,000 to 5,000 square feet are shown and three
proposed building pads are shown along Sprague Avenue These pad sites range m s¢e from 3,290 to
4,800 square feet The existing "mall" complex is shown consisting of two existing maJor retailers, a
proposed Rosauers grocery store, a restaurant, and eight separate existing mall areas Three addibonal
proposed major retaiters are located west of Dartmouth Road and east of Walnut Road The Change of
Conditions is intended to allow for the redevelopment of the former University City Shoppmg Center wdh the
minimum development standards specified by the Spokane County Zonmg Code The site plan shows
general compliance with applicable development standards of the Zonmg Code of Spokane County
Staff A►nalVsis:
The subject property is located mostly within the Major Commercial Category but also within the Urban
Comprehensive Plan Category The Major Commercial Category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial
uses, directly related to major throughways Goal 61 of the Major Commercial Category states °Promote
development of commercial land in a manner which is complementary and compabble with adjacent land
uses and the surrounding environment" ObjecUve 6 1 b states "Prowde for aesthetics of development along
County Artenals and State Highways or Freeways° Decision Guidelme 6 1 3 states °Provide for aesthebc
quality of physical development and land use along rights-of-way for Artenals, State Highways and
Freeways withm the Urban Impact Area (UTA) of Spokane County as follows a) The rights-of-way as
descnbed above would be intended to have an aesthetically pleasmg view as seen by the travelmg public
and adjacent property owners when they are developed wdh commercial uses b) Standards regardmg
landscaping, signage, storage and architectural treatment should be developed for uses locatmg along these
rights-of-way°
Objective 6 1 c states °Require developers to provide sufficient land for off-street parking at commercial
sites" Objective 61 d states °Encourage adequate circulation patterns and commercial areas and provide
planned access to public transit" Objective 6 1 e states °Encourage tounst facilities m areas where there is
ease of access to major tourist routes" Decision Guideline 6 16 states "Before approvmg proposed
ZE-18A-89
Staff Report - Apn129, 1998 Neanng
4of8
J `
•
•commercial developments, it should be deter,nined 4hat a) thei proposal has adequate on-site areas for
existing and potential parking and storm drainage controi, and b) the proposal considers the impact upon
existing or planned transportabon facilities and confonns to County transportation plans and policies, and c)
the proposal considers access to existing and planned pubtic transit faciiities and rautes Decision Guideline
6 1 7 states 'Mulbple-use clustering proposals complementary to existing and/or proposed commercial
development wiil be posibvely considered when such proposals accomplish the intent of established County
policies, standards and cntena Some examples include a) shanng physical facilites such as mgress and
egress, parking facilities, sidewalks, signs, buffenng and landscaping facitibes, or b) providing cooperatrve
amenities in landscaping andlor innovative design features"
The southern approximate 10% of the subject property is located in the Urban Category of the Spokane
County Comprehensive Plan The Urban (U) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of a"crty-like" environment which includes vanous land uses, intenswe residentiai development
and pubiic faciirties and services (water, sanitary and storm sewer Imes, police and fire protection and other
features) Due to the vanety and mix of land uses and,acUvities found in the Urban Category, there are few
land use activities that would be inappropnate The Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan states that "the
area along the boundary befinreen two or more land-use categones ls the 'transition area The southem
portion of the subject property is just such an area in that is located in the Urban categary but adjacent to
the (Viajor Commercial category When the subject property was re-zoned, it was determmed that the
transition policy applied and that d was therefore appropnate to re-zone the property to Regional Busmess
(B-3)
The purpose of the B-3 zone is to provide for the location of a wide range of retaii and service actrviUes
This zone will impiement the MaJor Commercial category of the Comprehensnre Plan The uses within this
zone may often require large areas for customer pariung, retaii service, some outside activifies, display and
other commercial activiUes The businesses locabng wnthin these areas often draw customers from the
county at large and other ouflying areas rather than from a more limded trade area Further it is the intent of
this section to implement comprehensNe plan policies whrch encourage commercial development along
Pnncipal Arteriais or highways and establish regional-servmg commercial areas General charactensfics of
these areas include paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, and a full line of public services
including manned fire protecUon and public transit accessibdity The Regional Business (B-3) zonmg, having
been established by the previous land use action (ZE-18-89), is not the subject of the present heanng The
~ issue of this public hearing is whether the revised srte plan is m compiiance with the Zonmg Code, as
amended and whether the requested change of condibons implements the Goals, ObJectives and Decision
Guidelmes of the Comprehensive Plan The revised site ptan shows general compiiance with the minimum
requirements of the Spokane County Zornng Code but does not implement the majonty of the Goals,
Objectives and Decisron Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan
The applicant is requestmg changes to existing condiUons of approval regardmg landscaping, signage,
parking lot, and nght of way requirements The specfic condrbens of approval the applicant wishes to
change are contained m application Attachment #1 revised 12-8-97 and are as follows tn italics A Division
of Building and Planning response follows each proposed change of conditions
Heanng Examiner Committee Condttfon of Appraval #2 (HEC#2) regarding the approved vanance (VE-38-
89) The applicanr proposes fo provide parking rn accorrl twth the Zornng Code, so a vanance is no longer
necessary
The applicant proposes to delete the condibon entirely and comply with the Zoning Code There is
conflicting information as to the total number of parking on the site plan of record Under'Parking
Information', the total parking provided is 2383 spaces Under'Project Data', parking provcded is
2388 spaces It is not possible to verify individual retail, warehouse and restaurant square footages
for the proposal, so it is not possible to say that reqwred parking spaces have been calculated
correctly Pnor to issuance of any building permits, srte plan review will be required to verrfyy
required parking
ZE-18A-89
S1aff RepoR - Apdl 29, 1888 Hearing
5 of 8
.
,
.
Heanng Examiner Committee Condition of Appr+oval #5 (HEC#5) regards a Master Developmenf P/an The J- ~
apphcant requests this condlhon of approva/ be deleted rn rts enbrety smce a large regional mall is no longer
contemplated Apphcant agr+ees to abide by Zon►ng Code Regiona/ Business (&3) Development Standards
The applicant proposes compliance with applicabie standards of the Regionai Business (B-3) zone
of the Spokane County Zoning Code The Division of Bwlding and Planrnng would prefer to see a
master development pian that would guide the overall redevelopment and to provide for coordinated
review On the site plan of record dated 12-18-97 and received by the DNision of Building and
Pianning on 1-1-98, is a disclaimer that states "This pian represents the owner's proposed
redevelopment plan This plan may be changed without nobce in any manner, The owner does not
covenant by this plan that any tenant hereon will be a tenant or that redevelopment will occur as
depicted" This disclaimer is not acceptabie with regard to changes uwithout notice in any manner"
The applicant is bound by what is represented regarding landscapmg, signage and parking on the
site pian and site development would require conformance with the site plan of record
Heanng Examiner Committee Condition of Approva! #8 (HEC#8) regardmg landscaping and °208" storm
warer retention facrlitres The applicant requesfs that °for newiy developed areas° be mserted atter the worrl
°provrded" because "complrance with `208' guidel►nes rs not pracUcal for exishng parkmg lots°
The Division of Buifding and Planning is of the opmion that redevelopment of the subject property
will likely exceed 50% of the current assessed value Therefore, the appiicant is obliged to compiy
with Board of County Commissioners ResoluGon No 80-1592 which requires the applicant to
comply with '208' shandards when redevelopment exceeds 50% of the assessed vaiuation
Heanng Examiner Committee Condition of Approval #9 (HEC#9) regardmg landscaping The applicant
" rzequests that the condiGon be de/eted in its entirety because it was appropnate for a regional mall which is
no longer contemplated Applrcant proposes to landscape "newly developed site areas° in accorrdance witti
Regiona/ Business (8-3) Development Sfandarris
The Division of Budding and Pianning is of the opinion that redevelopment of the subject property
wiil likely exceed 50% of the current assessed value The appiicant proposes what amounts to non-
compliance with the Zoning Code The Dwision of Building and Planning believes the appiicant is
obliged to comply mnth Spokane County Zoning Code Secbon 14 806 020 (2) which requires the
applicant to comply wrth landscaping standards when redeveiopment exceeds 50% of the assessed
valuation
Heanng Examiner Commitiee Condition of Approval #10 (HEC#10) hawng to do with signage The
applrcant seeks to rncrease the allowed srgnage on the subject property and agrees to comply wrth Regronal
Busmess (8-3) signage requirements
The Division of Building and Plannmg is of the opmion that extensive signage exists in the vicinity of
the subject property Simpte compliance with the zonmg code is not desirable Both Sprague
Avenue and Second Avenue should not be used to compute frontage and sign area The original
condition of approval provided reasonable restncfions to determine signage
County Planning Condition of Approval #9 (CP#1) regards the legal descnption of the subjecf property The
Iega/ descnpfion of fhe subJect property has changed since fhe zone reclassifrcatron (frle # ZE-18-89) The
applicabon for change of condrtions does not apply to Spokane County Tax Parcel # 45201 0391 (south of
and adjacenr to Sprague, west of Dartmouth) and Spokane County Tax Parcel # 45209 0110 (soufhwest
corner of Sprague and Unrversrty) which wer+e a part of the earirer zone reclassification (ZE-18-89)
ZE-18A-89
Staff Report - Apni 29, 1998 Hearing
6 of 8
!
• , This change is acceptabie to the Division of Building and Planning The applicant should be aware
that the earlier Zone Reciassification Conditcons of Appraval wiil remain in effect for those two
parcels, if the proposed change of conditions is approved
County Planning Condibon of Approval #3 (CP#3) r+egar+ds the concept pr+esented to the Heanng Examiner
Committee The applicant asks to insert the word °revlsed" before the word concepf ro indicate the new s►te
plan as beingi the one of record
This change is acceptable to the Division of Buildmg and Planning
County Planning Condirion of Approva! #6 (CP#6) having to do with '208' recommendahons The applicant
requests that "for newly developed area° be inserted after the second worri "runoff' The applicanr rs
requeshng that,they not be required to comply with'Board of County Commissroners Resolution No 80-1592
that requires exrshng development fo be upgraded to cument srandards when redesign exceeds 50 % of the
value of the property
The Division of Buildmg and Planning is of the opmion that redevelopment of the subject property
will exceed 50% of the current assessed value Therefore the applicant is required to compiy with
Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592 which requires the appircant to comply
with '208' standards when redevelopment exceeds 50% of the assessed valuabon The Division of
Buiiding and Planning objects to the added language
.
Counfy P/annrng Condibon of Approval #7 (CP#7) isgar+ding future drvisions of land The applicant requesrs
that °approved Bmdmg Site P/an" be inserted after "RCW 5817
.
The Division of Building and Planning suggests the language be modified to say °Any division of
land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comp{y with RCW 5817 andlor the Spokane
County Subdmsion Ordinance pnor to issuance of buildmg permits°
County Planning Condrbon of Approva! #9 (CP#9) regards a landscape plan and bonding The app!►cant
requests fhat "wrth a performance bond" be removed from the condibon
The Division of Building and Planning suggests the language be modified to say °A specific
landscape plan, plantmg schedule and provisions for mamtenance acceptable to the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning DirectoNdesignee shall be submitted with a performance
bond or,other suitabie guarantee for the project,pnor to release of buildmg permits°~
Ali other proposed changes are to Condipons of Approval from the County Engineenng Division and are
requested because the ongmal condihons have been complied with or are no longer appiicable Concems
of the Fire District as expressed in letter to Louis Webster, dated 4-1498 are significant and need to be
resoived Fundamentally, what had been originally proposed as a unified development in the previous land
use action (ZE-18-98) is instead bemg proposed to be developed p,ecemeal, v+nthout a consistent master
plan and utilizing the mmimum development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone
Staff Recommendabon:
Some of the proposed changes to the original conddions of approval are warranted and appropnate but
other proposed changes are not desirable and/or are contrary to the Zoning Code and County Resolubons
The Division of 8uilding and Planning recommends conditions HEC#2, CP#, CP#3, CP#7, and CP#9 be
approved, as condiboned Other Hearing Exammer Committee and County Planning Condifions of Approvai
ZE-1 SA-88
Slaff Report - April 29, 1998 Hearing
7 ot 8
, . . • . r
shouid not be changed Proposed changes to County Engineer's conditions are identified m Attachment #1
and are addressed by Spokane County DNision of Engineering and Roads
Attachments:
A Maps
a Vicinity Map
o Site Plan
o Comprehenswe Plan Map
o Zoning Map
B Attachment #1 to the applicabon
C Agency and Public Comments
D Recommended Conditions of Approval
ZE-18A-89
Staff RepoR - Apni 29, 1998 Heanng
8of8
~
f • ' ~ ~ s ♦
•
• •b
ArrACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY hl1AP
SITE PLAN
CQMPREHENSIW PLAId MAP
ZONINGUAP
ZE.-j
ry ` 0 Nlap
~
~
~
~
~c -
f
~ 34
~ 33
31 32 ~
~
36 ~
3~
Of
r
~ 0
~ ~s os
~ 01
, • .
A
J7~~~ ` Y
2 wAILJ< IN
.~E ynLp
j ~~~~ctC ~4~• ` ~ ~ • Z~ 10
` . Y~ Q
r
i
l 12 1
y~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ^ ~ • 'R
♦ f
BR ~wAY o
1? R+
_ N7r ST Nus SPRa X , N
~
fAlROU S R x
~ P(><ANE 1N81
7
~l~Nfl.LS 20 ` -
~ t
'r 1
X R~ e
~ pVf- ~ 19
f , 23 - o ' 1~4
' ,
2
30 . 29-0 ~ ~Fpy'P'J'S
~ 25 ~ PA~x
,
,
26 4L-)
~ 3 ~
pAjN ~ 3d
,
3~ ~ bLF
31 N
. 3 6 t
35
"r.►- _ 1
~ y +w
a
ti ♦ ♦ ♦
~ J
v~c~~t-rY MAP
r~ -
0zti219a
Not to Scale
Z
0
r.
0
cn
n
v
~ zF-~gFl-~f
evnouu Arca aa"iron rrrucaua nrarxitwn nro.tcf cntn . ~ '
wA Yr 111N1~ w i1.VN4n,I1 wi• M~~ w ~..~~M .
Il'tiYM~w fl \ 1 l V W.. w w . ~..w~~~r~a .
M1 w 1 ~nl~~vlww~~unryl ~iM I~M ~
~M14a~A fla~9 lAU w~w~M~ ~ d u w~»
•I~~r~~+ In~
hNMY M~~ Vlti\ ) 4Y N\M~w r ~ ~ t w
~h~U01 Y 1~~11 W'AY4 • ' • Nv~~~r' N~
rsv-=:u r.c e OL "
f91h M1DM Yt• ~ w'Iern 4n wI "r ii \w~'w~i.-
app
• w ~ 0
r Y Y r M~r ir~ p~r ~~~ry~ ~
V iP►fI (111 4, w~ ~ M •
/LM10tiA\fMl ~~.V I• w ~ ~w
1 11 H I V Ili 1 ~ ~
1 11 llµM I.W r~~~ w
I II IIIM 16 VI I
1 11 ayr IiqIM 1 .00600
1
~ ~ w..surr a~uu ~ .
wL wr i
0 63-a , • ~,~:~LIUL'D '
- IAM~~K I~ 1 / ~
O j 11 V10 , V 1 rYatNY , Y~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIII~ t
N , ~~'(,~l(~1Nk (;fJ►!NT; ~ --u
011111111►IIIIIIB{IIIIIID
oA ~M
r~'"~yp 03
N .o• ':v ~ !umuuwnwini ~nu~ ~ ~ ~ JAN 011990 F ~
Q) (11 I UII I N11t1 I 111AIx 1 I1 1 1't 11 1 1 IKI I'1 elA1
RLt~L17c9~ ~u~t
u rww. -t ~@is a..[ ~ wd xrt '.+e R
, • ~~ql~~tt ~
~ l1 JF'lAUfdIMC
_ L ~ ~1.~ I~II t~ rA r.K~ ronY~~~~ a • ` C'Z7
~ ' ` ~ ~ _ ~ ~V
Z ( ~ - ~ 'I^ fi i t Ullll7 ! ~ F q.°. ;ov. `~01~ .O) aWU~w~ `Q/~✓
1 I Jae-
e-. i`•-;~
: ; i? `:~'',~~'i ~ i , . I ~ ~ Q •
r 1 4 ~
" {.i " f..i G ~I I 1 ~W
1 i r ^ / ' 1~ W GL 4U
CJ
111m11VIIRIIAN
,w~„~
~ ~ t ~w 1 fH.1' i ~
N
0 3 ~
`=r ty.ia
IUllll P ~ I ,w `ptilt6 flrtmltl E I '
~ - 1 t ~ [i7 i~ L t'S9{~~ Y 1r 1 1~" r w.
rn _ _ ~ 6P ti w'4 * n
'v w Q
`1-1~ `E ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~iiid. ~ 'l~:stt► ~
~ 1~~ ~ ~ ~I i ~ ♦ a~ a u ~ ' :.~7 t:1..
O " ` nq~~Llql(yu~~ ` r a e j ! t c ' ! t ~~~~OtIUt(1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ u~~. I ~ LL m 4 1
~ ~'`~,~y~- ~~►fU! l 7~~~"u"u1"u~w'"~~ •r~ ~ ~I~"a. ~j'r ~ ~ J Ach k
%aan%ra.l v
m - . ~ , • . ~ i y,~;~,~r
M r r - O~GV11fLh.Y L.~
Z _ ~'1 ~r,~•• , _L.~.._
ryr,..~ , : ,w~ ~ . • - ~~~~..t-• ~ a:-~vr- - . ~ ~
r ~ ^'i coa
Z ~`ce"fi~~ I' 14 h I 1 dl I l~ ,1 I~ 1 i11 ~1 ti I I~ It ti( I I' I,~ i~ ~ E I) ~oa~ ounae~no r°~, • ^
~ ~oiC'
V
03
~
1g ~
~
. se
Ive ~
loand _
hens
~ -
.~,z~~.
~
5 to '
L r ' ~"j ~ ►
~
t, Subi,ect Pra'Pe~ ~
a . ~ • , r°
~
3
• ,
~ . .
tur el ( a t~. o t ►
,
. ,
l j
• ~Q 6~ ~ L~ nx.~t~t ~ ~,r • ~ ~ - ■
f n 1' S'~'• "J~~l.r` , } ►
' . J`~ ~ • ~Y ~ ~ ~ /~~~~'~~'r• ~ r~ti' ~ r~ _
_ ~ ~:•c„, . s~a`` r • '~•~;,~'_~r,,••~fg
~ r„~ ri fn+4 ~ ..i.+ ~
►Sls r,"~., "Z +a,,~'i ~'~t~C
n n !3
31
n~~~• t O\p
y ~ 4= ♦
he5ter r~,,.., o
~
_ ~~fr ♦
ti tA
~ 3 Ytlv
f y
1 ~ a ~ y
,
~
pLAN MA-P
_ CQMp~EHENSIVE
N'
021~2t9$
Not to gcate
,
~ +go
m ~
~
~
zoining
~
, f
, .
. ~
'1► ~ ~ ~ t ~ ,r
' ~ •►t~ 1
, • %A'
V ~ t ~S ~ • ~ ,
1
. ~
~ aP~ ~ • ~ + {
1 ~ ~ • ,
.
LP) . ~
, ~ .
1, « t
7
S ~ 7
lu t ~ ` ~ ( T.' / - r~. ~ +~'7`~ ;
rr
Z~
~ t~ ~ ~ ~ c~
r r
~ r rt
t . , .
. .
; _ .
.
~ A
ZONING MAP
02t12198
Noti to Scale
.
s ~ ~ ♦ y ~ ~
ATi ACHMENT B
ATTAC.HMENT #'1 TO THE APPLiCAT10N
a
i '
!
+
~ y 5 3 BBernardo-Wzlls
ArChiteGtS, P C ~
P 1 a n n i ng
~~~~~~~,00KN
A r c h it e c r Li r e
I n r e r io rs 9 1991
❑lVIS1C'1q C~~ 501LDtNC ANI) PLPN%1N0
BY
A'T7'ACHMEENT #1
CHANG~ OF COlY~ITIONS FDR A
PREVIOY7SLY APPRUVEI3 ZO1VE CEA~~E
May 13, ]9971 Revised 12-5-97
(Note This Attachrnent #1 provldes supplemental infornation to the Change of Conditions appircaton and
was originally subrnitted wn#h it 1n May 1997 Tbe rev1slons contatned herein are m respanse to Staff
camments made at the 6-12-97 Technical Review Meeting Items which were revised frorn the 5-17-97
submittal are nat~d with an astensk )
T'he anginal conditlons ofappraval are repranted below Froposed de1etions to #he canditians are nated wYth
a single line drawn t.hrnugh the text (paiCmg), Froposed addittons to the conditions are noted with
highlighted text (parking) Commentary fallaws each condition offenng explanatiQn and/arjustificatian for
the grapased madlficahons
CONDITIONS OR Cf3N'TIlNGENCIES A,PFLIEI] TO TH~S APPROVAL
(Eeg1I1Fllt1g oT7 Page 3 of t`le HEC deCISTOn)
1 A11 Canditions imposed by the Heanng Examiner Cammiftee shall be bindmg on the i`APPlicant",
vvluch terrn shall include owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, arid suceessors-in-interest
2
~ach
1^
Camr~ent~ L7elete thls condztion xn its entirety The onginal candihon establishes a vanance
` from the zoning_codespecific to enclvsed}regional shoppmgjnalls,,whrch rs no
langer~needdapplicantpin~end~tv provide parlqngj~n acr~dancewith the
y ~ i`~ ~ f,{ tP Y F ~ r
l
~[?I]II1t Code: A
3 Tha# the appltcant shall submYt to the Planning Directar, forrevicw and deternzination, the necessary
documentation as specified withyn Section 14 802 140, Ja1nt-[.Tse Parlang Requirements, pnor to
issuance of any bu2lding pernits
Cornments 'I4S_ changes groposed- n
4 That prior to the release of any buiTding permzts for this site, thic applicant shal1 subm1t, to tlhc
Planning Director fvr revievv and approval, or at hzs discretton at apublic hearng before the Heanng
Examiner Camrnittee, a`°Master Developrnent Planp" which shall incarporate all conditions of
approval and cvmply with the Regional Busmess (B-3) zone of the Zoning Code Said Master
Development Plan wiXa be utilrzed to determine phasBng of the praject and required improvements
-.-~.rti,. ~ ~ 'Co~rnent~ 3~To chan~es ~roD o sc d k r rt r 107 S4~A1k~1 -1~ti~ti ~i ~ 5u i tC=~21~ 4- S~~oI.ai~c, ~rl~fA~)9?O] o (~l)9)838-~511 ~ F~~ ~.~~9) ~3~--~6(}~
~ -
~
r f p x l
5
i
4C6 irii~~ n~`s ~ DeIete this cvndition in its ent3retY 'Me or1ginal candition was apProPnate for a
large regional ma11 The proposal is for acansiderably reduced proaect compared
tn the pFO)ect onglnally► proposed C-omphanee;wYtlrthe-B3'zon-e~deveI
op`rnenf'
sEnLrd-sias required by Condition 3 above will be suffcient
b* The appllcant shall coordinate vvtth the Spokar~e Transit Systern (STA.) ta incorporate into the Master
Development Pian, a pedestnan access to the STA. transfer site ]acated to the sauth acxoss the
Nlilwaukee Road nght of way In addition the "Plan" shall comply wlth the Zonsng Code's
requirement for bicyc1e racksfstorage areas which shall be located at maa or entrances to the shopping
center
-Comn&ts°'7 No clianges propased-
7 A11 on-site I2ghting shall cornply vvi#h the Regional Business (B-3) zvne and the Airport []verlay
Zane
Camments=3 Na changcs prapased
$ That compliance with the landscaping standards ❑f the Zoning Codt shall be provYded for new.11
de eloe.t~~ai~~ v~+it~i required "20$" storm water dralr~age a~reas t0 be lo~ated adjacent ta County
nghts of way ar as approved by the P1arning Dlrector Said laridscaping and "208" areas may be
cornbined as pemutted by the P]anning Director and the County Engineer
-Coine`ntsF P ne applicant propases to provide landscapmg and "208" storm water retentlon for
~e~~.pa~~d ~rid develoXd ar6asI'Much of the proposal includes existing parking
areas and building Carnpliance with "20$" guldelines is not pracfiical for existing
parking lats
9
btrtidmg a~ 'Lliese -Camirients.'J Delete condltion in its en#irety The onginal condition is specific to an enclosed
regYVnal mall only C,L~dscaping; of--newlyfideveloped s1te~,aieas~vu~I~,-be=ynP
`"accordanc~ v~nt~ B=3 develo~mental s#andar`ds.' m_
10
,
~
6' ft-Yrr
freestandl~~~ r r and r`~vall Ad signs shall be as permltted bY the Reizional
Business,(B_-3) zone except that for the:Purpos6,a#`corriputmg $`ontaize 6iid sl= ar_ca, bo#~$prague
and Secor~~ Avenue,v~rill be caunted f~ir~l~ts h~~ngxfron4geIaIong bat1 streetsR
Comments -~l The original conditlon established k'vanancv from the zoning code specific: to
enclosed reglanal shopping rnalIs which ts no longer needed '1'heA.pghcantintends,)
:~#o prpvsde slgnage in accordance vnth the -zoning code
1
i
1 ' ♦ • ( 11 That those conditions and agreements entered mto regarding the bamcading of the gravel parking
lot (file # ZE-50-87) shall be btnding and continue unhl such time as redevelopment of the site
occurs
Comments.; No changes proposed r
COITNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Begmning on Page 4 of the HEC decision)
1 That the following descnbed property shall be approved to the B-3 Zone and all current standards
of the Zoning Code as amended shall be complied with in the development of this site
See updated legal descnphon included wrth the application from
2 Planning Director/designee shall approve a specific extenor lighring plan for the approved area pnor
to installation of such lighting (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full
consideration to adjacent properhes)
Comments--- 7-- No changes proposed"T
3 The applicant shall develop subJect property generally in accordance wlthm the revised concept
presented to the Heanng Exarruner Committee Vanations, when approved by the Planning
Duector/designee, will be permitted, includmg, but not limited to the following changes building
location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All vanahons must
° conform to regulations set forth m the ZONIlVG CODE FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY The onginal
mtent of the development plans shall be maintained
Comments - Pioposed change is uitended to update"this condihon to cur'rent circumstances
4 The proJect is subJect to Section 14 706, the Aquifer Sensihve Area Overlay Zone of the ZOIVING
CODE FOR SPOk:.ANE COUNTY, which sets forth vanous measures for Aquifer protection,
specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protechon measures, and storm water
runoff
TComments No change`s proposed %
5 The present proposal is not detalled enough to determine whether or not the use of or matenals
stored on the site are m compliance with Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensihve Area Overlay Zone) of
the ZONIlVG CODE FOR SPOX;ANE COUNTY Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the
sponsor/applicant shall be required to file wrth the Spokane County Auditor, wnthin thirty (30) days
of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision m this matter, a"Notice to the Public"
which shall provide in matenal as follows
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE ZOIVING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY SECTION 14 706 (AQUIFER
SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE) THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS
NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS "
Comments ~ No changes proposed "7
6 Applicant shall comply with `208' recommendations concerning storm water runoff and provide
necessary landscaping for runoff for newly developed area
.
• . ~ .
Comment_-°-V Proposed change is uitended to'update this condihon to cur'rent circumstances ~
7 Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58 17,
approved Binduig Site Plan, and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances pnor to issuance of
building permits
Comments - Proposed change is lntended to update this condihon to current cucumstances
8 The Spokane County Planning Deparhnent shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a"Title Notice" noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This "Title Notice" shall serve as
official public notice regarding condihons of approval affecting the property in question The "Title
Notice" shall be recorded within fifteen (15) days of final disposihon of the approved land use action
and shall only be exhnguished by the Spokane County Planning Department The "Title Notice"
shall generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally descnbed as (legal descrzptzon and tax parcel number) is the subject
of a land use action, imposing a vanety of special development conditions, by a Spokane County
Heanng Body or Administrative Official on (date) and as may be amended, altered or supplemented
by official actlon or as already changed File No (Planning Department Fale Number) is available
for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Plannmg Department
Comments - -No changes proposed -i
9 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the
Spokane County Planning Director/designee shall be subrrutted for the
project pnor to release of building permrt
~ Comments ,A -perforinance_ bond -is not necessary- to=ensure compliance °v~nth landscaping`
s requirements i
COiJNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Beginning on Page 6 of the HEC decision)
Pnor To The Issuance Of A BuildinQ Permit Or Use Of The Property As Proposed
1* Applicant shall petition the Board of County Commissioners for the vacation of Dartmouth Road
from Sprague to the Milwaukee Road R O W
~~Comment No changes proposed'7
2
fibif otivs-
1 ,
2 ,
3 ,
4 ,
5 ,
Comments Delete this condition entirely Universtty Road right-of-way has been previously
acquired and road improvements are complete-,
,
:
3 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtamed from the Spokane
County Engineer
Comments ~,,-No changes proposed-'
4 ,
~
Eiigiiieei's
Commentr Delete this condition enhrely Umversity Road has-been lmproved to0 current
standards
5 - ,
,
Cominents Delete this condition enlhrely Intersechon improvements have been completedv
6
Comments O' Delete this condition enhrely The onginal condition was specific-to a-regional`-"
mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
.
7 , SOUtfl Of SpLagUC AVVollur, ds
Comments Delete this condition entirely The onglnal condition was specific-to a=regional~
~ mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
8
_ ,
,
Comments ~ Delete this condition entirely The ongmal condition was specificAto a.regional
mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
9
Commerits Delete this condition entirely The ongmal condition was specific.to°a regional
mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
10
Comments~ Delete this condition entirely The ongmal condition was specific~to-a regionaly
mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
11 , diaiiiage,
Comments ; Delete this condition entirely The onginal condition was specific to a•regional--w
mall development which was considerably larger than the cunent proposal
~
~ • •
12 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County
Health Distnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for
the entire proJect or any portion thereof, if the development ls to be phased
Comments t No changes`pfoposed V
13 A parlang plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County
Engineer The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be m accordance with
standard traffic engineenng practices Paving or surfacmg as approved by the County Engineer, will
be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
Comments - No changes proposed -,T
14
_Comments,, Delete this condition entirely The ongmal condrtion was specific to a regional
mall development which was considerably larger than the current proposal
15 All requued improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications
for Road and Bndge Consfiruction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resoluhons
pertaining to Road Standards and Storm Water Management in effect at the date of construction,
unless otherwise approved by the County Engmeer
`Comments ~ YNo changes proposed~
16 Act%„ - - ,
WalnntRoad
Comments , This condition is no longer applicable to the proposed plan *
17 Roadway standards, typical roadway sechons and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal
Comments '~P~ ~ No changes3pro`posed b
18 - -
Tomments: ~y" Delete conditions entirely The onginal condition was onginally intended to apply
to the required Sprague Avenue and University Road improvements No
improvements in public nght-of-ways other than dnveways and possibly utility
connections are proposed
COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
No changes-to coridihons are proposed 3
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
No changes to condihons are proposed,%
r
• , • . ° + ,
COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTi1~IENT
No changes are proposed
WATER PURVEYOR
-No changes to condittons are proposed A
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
No changes'to condihoris are proposed
r
. ' • • .
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
i 4 t 1 a
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
' 1026 W $roadway Ave, 5pokane, WA 99260-0170 {509}456-3600 Pax 324-3478
I "ENGINEER' S CC7NDITIQN$ OF APgRQVAL" ZONE
~ TO Spokane Cour~ty PJ.annzng DeparLmen
~'F~OM Di~risior~ of Engineer1ng & Rc~~.c~.s
~
~~TE Apr11 l6r 1998
PROJECT: B - 3 CI~G OF CCINA
FILE # ZEY 0O1$A-89 /
Hearing 04/29f199$ @ 10:30 #2
Review Date @ #
SponsorfApplicant. GARY BERNARDO
SeCtl~n Towrxship Range: 20-25-44
Planner 4 LOUIS WEBSTER
Technical Re-vxew Date (06,112/1997 @ 2 15)
The Spokane County Eng1neering Department has reviewed the above referenced
applicatiorx. The following "Conditions of Approval" are subm:itted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the r;F:Lndings of Facr-,
Conclusions and Ord~~/l)ecislon'r should the request be approued
Prior to issuance of abuilding perm-it ar at the request of the County
Engineer zn con3unctian with a County Road Prajec-t/Road Improvem~nt
District, whichever comes firsz
1. Applicant shall deliver for acceptance k~~ ~he County Engineer a clear
and unencurrberecf right--af-way deed for Una.versity Road which was
constructed in conjunction w1th CRF #2298.
4CCI61 OJ_ i49 4 P ~2~ A licar~t shal~. dedicate e re ~x~.re~rz ht-of-w~a ~for ~he V 1.e
pP . 9 ~ Y
Couplet and Dartmouth Raad as shown an the adopted right-oz-way P~~~
for County Road Pro3eet Na 2396 Acopy of the approved plan is
attached to these condZtians sha? 1be referred to as 'Exi~~ bit A'
3 Access permi-1L-_-s for approaches ta the Caunty Road System shall be
obtained f ram the County Engineer
4, J~pPlican-c shall submit for apQroval by the Spokane Co~~zy Engineer
drainage and access plans
5 The applicant shall subr~i-c for appraval by the S-Pokane County Engineer
anci tlie Spokane County Health D-istrict a detazl ed comb_-ned on-s 2.te
seWage system p1an and surface water d-isposal pl.an for the ent-ire
pro]ect or partion thereof if the development zs phaseci _
cC Anplicant
Cng ine er/ Survevor
Planne.r I,CUIS WEBST'Elt
i
. , .
Page 2 of 5
04/29/1998 06/12/1997
ZE-OO18A-89
6 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro]ect which is to
be occupzed or traveled by vehicles
7 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specificatlons for Road and Bridge construction
and other apolicable county standards and/or adopted resolutlons
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
8 No direct access be allowed from lots to the Valley Couplet right-of-
way until the Valley Couplet is constructed and established by the
Board of County Commissioners and an approach permit ls issued by the
County Engineer
r
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements Gre found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
10 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way untll a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of w-ay is subDect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilitles either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property ~o be dedicated or set aslde future acquis?tion Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation reaarding these utilzties The applicant should check with
J
the appllcable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the Gpplicant or utility is responsible for ad3ustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
12 The Gpplicant shall grant applicable border easzments adjacent ~o
Spokzne County Rlght of Way per Spokane County Standards
tl
~
f
I
~ xH I 1--71 rA
5?RA~~UE nvEriUE
a
_ - - b
t
~ ,
__------_-_w
~a w
-
- - a
_ ~
- Iq!fql N
a ^ _
~ Q r
= SEC 20 T 25N R 44E W M '
~
I -
~smoni ~
I~ <I
v,uo- rcw~ ~ ~
t I
+o-u ~ I ; I io-u
~n
~ (~ta a~I ~ ~ ~ro a .
( s:of o~n)
iOTAI wEw OF PARCEIS BEIOw jI
I ~ Nor To Sc~E ~ I$~ I
LECEND L
IM4tQNWIMG1~L4h ~
Rq4i0. a utl ~f I { I ~ I I I
. 14M16~d 0 WI ~
w/ 0+ 4 n e r W I ~ 1 I •
~qplp ~M b ~ ull
CURVE TARLE
n: i Q w~ ' a+ K ~ l• c s~~ ~n euna ~4Km ~au. ~iw cni ~ i c w ~ G=~- I ~ I
t
ci • ~ ~.~f 1 a a~ m~ ~~s3ii ~ i e.u ~ n n~
I ~ I~ n.] I~r uv ~~aa;m »ite e ~r~ ~ I i I i
~ . -~L { ~iw1 So~aorN, r,
uarr p 1~ , ~~;r~Suinaot. ~ ,
enaa.[dlnnc~o- xoOmPOt ~ i ~ , I'Of
O r~.r.eq .W ~ • V I I IOT00 ~07TfA ~ 1YC~ I 0
I I.~I I I~ miO T 1 i ~ 7 7 ~ t \ I
~0 C ]0 IW ~ ~ I ~ u 1~7a r
SC+I[ ni flLl
1 ~ I /1
~
q o~"i~i ~a~ "
o
a u
~ - _ _ - _ _ i ( cilx
^
« ~ N!`11L1 ~ ` s `t ~
n . •
~
,
p ~ 1
~ 1/ ~.~1 t 1 1y ~ 1 !
ALLEY acra~er
o , .a~„ 9 140.00
= i 5716
C
G ~ • I r, , , n „ `i^`~ ~ sni tx I
y . ~ ~5~~
ne~t u ~ ~
e
o s ~ 'T•_.` , ~ 8
Gmw.Jl\
I u~•~34
L eMio3.y ~ ~
d ~ ~
G ( shh R a~v, C
~ Stw a>t ; o-u • tae ~a! ~ i . f
b +i qi 12 1 S .Au{r
O (~ioin. -I ~ • '
~ i sI. 10 o000 ~ c.a~wd co+o .
10
~~mrcoo~ ~ ST i 6 1 ]I ~ ~ 150+GOI ~raiu q ~I,` ~ :
~ •
( »aas,
~an J
tirot w ~ r10-03 - ,y I i VL+ ~ ~,~~2 e
.Ci--vC ° p
L-
umem I
Ap Oo ~ .~r~ ~ " f ~
~
r,I=
~ ~ CnS[I 7900 Y U~S~I ~fbl~ I/~ u
~e, 9FC~ ~ta~ r I ~ iaia
.To r V i kot (SUmu3j ro e~~ iau ; ro~a 1 S.
i ~ u ur a~ $pa),anr Cuunly JiVNL ` CWN1Y ROkD PRp,ECT MO 23S6 VaILEY CCU%L~f
SCAI.E Dapartmeil of PuAlit
L Morks '~P~'ROVED SNE£T
o• ~r RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN
b..
/4n [Ce~N
C
!.1. N¢aROKLL ~ +.L 10t6
~i., o~ na o~io TNIiR4AY RDA TD UyI~RyS7 AO,D
~~y i.. r,.. nna ~ e~wo q~' EXPIR_S 05/2 ~(~99 ~ V wa[a . x a~ ~ccso i 10 p(3
o ~
~
, ~ ~~~~I~ ~ 1
ua104v+E 10 SHCO Ho 10
~ I
I~ I
uACnura ro sNm r~ ~o su iss.oo ~ I I
'~aa . ~ Ij I
, I I
~ ' ~ ~ I I
~ ~ ~ ~ I ' I
~ io-u ; ~ ~
I I I
~ (~f7moe») l ( ~
I ~i+Stt~-7i~~`i I . ~ ~o-u I I
~ ~ i~~~ ~ ~ wn w-u (~to, ox~ I I
I h/ ~ ~ ~ uai »a1 l~m ~m ) I I
~
i u~ I ~ I I
~I (~ni o~q ~ I I I
1
~ ~ S'r¢r 7~ ~ o . I I
I I n ~i ~~n ~ ~
' J i. • ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~
~ i xa ~ ~ ~ i i
~ ~ s~ ~ I ~ ~
~ ' I:~ ~ V I I
~ I • ~ Iw I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~~ I
I ~ ~ ~~~I I ~ I~ j
~ j n-o~ ~ 1- ~ tiriy . I< I
I ~ im on~] j ~G,il I] I ~
Z i ~i+ } ! t~ J]~',`"~J~v. , SEC 20 T 25N R 44E W M i~' %
I w ~ ~'J' ~ -y ' I I
Q~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I i I
rI- I 1> I ~ LECENO j ~ •
~ ~ ~ ~ wN.o ti a~.~ia of ro.~ n
O~ I ~ 1 U Jw U~ WI I ~ '
4 ~ su~.I~ ~~gL ~ ~ u°'"`c.w'~~i ~v r I I
b'~S~ JY'W o
~ ~~-a ~ n ~a un m"'..°..`<i. K~~ ~r~ " ~ ~ L_-------`
hi 14M u14
I Iuoon.~ \ „ ~ ~r . BALfOUR ROA
~ ~!i~G~~ I~ ,~rr4r~~o0 ca~+~cw,.. ,.t e r.= ~
~ ~ w ro-m ~ ~ I
~ . .co-..n ~1 ~ I
~ ~~,.'~':~1 ~ ~
~ I ev..,,.,. ~ I
~ O r~~y~;9 I ~ o .u ~co 9 rI ~ ' I
~ ~l -I Ut~t i~74b00 ~ Kxl( pt i-I 4 ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ I -rt ~ ~
n~•l
j ~ m o ee~.,l CURVE TABLE ~ v j+ I
~ i I o I pqK~irttuon~lrituepl+a.nl u+n wrt~l~[cM ~~,~5 I
~ i_ ~t ~ ~l ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ rnro 1;d.~y,~ s f~~,~v ~ ~
~ C' "*I -i 1 ~ _L~ ~ a wuoo' i» i~ n~l`~✓ I i I
T T ~ e i ~ i to i Zs ~ i S ~5~. ~
I ~ 1..^i lIl' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 e~ i w~SO' 10 ~ ~ I ro ~
I ~l ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 I~G~i I~U.eI ~ I~~Cyl~jl~l'~ IIS~1' 9/ 1~0 ~
I ~J ~ 1~ ~lTjI~Q~~ppl '
~ ~~b~ a~~! ~ I Il wtnnwE i0 sN[E~ no ~t
~ ~ ~^y'~ ~ ~~s t y5 Nf
~ r`~t~p t C a ~ ras ~
j - ' C N ~ l `s~ ~ ~'i' N~%O
~ L ~ 4r. V,~ >,2
~ i 71 um ~~,o H °
I ~ ~
i ~t ~o
~ i - - / U503 /~v
'~ff~~lSll4~~(~~~ ~
`sf ~ ca
~ ~ i ~ ~OSL. SCAIE Spokane Counly ~PPROVED "RL~~~ ~ COUNIY ROAD PRaJECI NO tJ96 VnLIEY COUPL:i SH~~T
I i i I h Deparlmcnl af Publ{c Worke _y/~_ RIGMT-QF-VlAY PLAN
~ ti• ~ xo~ra za ~.n nu ~ a.w rw~ ~ t ~m~ ~I~CU . a
~ i Isct K~~. ~w ~~ya brts ~r+ + 170° 01° a~ ~"~`g~ EXP~RES 05/2f r89 V THIERl1AN ROAD 10 UNNFRSITY ROAO
n e i. e wrc~~ iwa ~ nao i~~ nwtr., u av tm~~ i 11 p~13 ~
~
~
/ ' .
r} ~~~+tiIS~ ~`I ~
yfr~rur.t re ss+~ ao t~
l
5~F~6 ~ p I I
`~e 5~ 1~17 lo-ll I I
t
1
I I
~ ~I
~
~N L.EGEND I
I I 1~ s~t n os ~~nae a t„n a m~ n I i
Y
7
I 1 ~ 4.} ~1/ Sli 111 IL7! ~ 1 Milp K5 - ~ I 4
1 . ~ ~ _
~ ISI' ~ •p Mi ' K w°~f K't ~e[Y ~
yo-syi~a W~ ~
V
~ ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
` ~ I I ~ ¢ ~awa~ utw'Itr P9YP7J7r I I
' ~ I • f l ~ v ~C }11~r[t I
.
I ~ ~ ~ #eu[ rE(s I < .
. J~Y ~ ` (~slOiAESA k }7
CURVE TA6LE
I `~}1 1 ~ 7N 7`~ f ' S ' ~ I hY OV IoY9Y I 797' ~ t
I Z ] Y i[SoW i11RIG i6 !S'I1l355'1 I ~
` I,f~ ` ~1 I ~ I A 1 41 ~ a"7~~~ ippro'i ~6~AnC' s9Y~ 117d5i~~
I i Sk 1 ! 1 V I
SEC 20 T 25N R 44E WM
1 '
~ ' 1 7~ P ~ r'[l; ,,2 !1 47 n tPS u rHR9h 90 I
~ o I I slu~ ~ f ` /
_
~ I I _ ~
- __LL----_'- _LL_____ '
- - - - - - - - - - - ' UNIVER59TY ftOAp y ~ y
t 1 u LLNE 19+00 _
~ T ~ I 1 N_~
s W~sz r 1 a iT - 1
M
J~ I 4 L1Y.71ft W°~ 4T iOl foo 111'1 A
~ -
-o- - - - -
r~~.~ ] J~~ ~ II V 69 ~
7 W 1~✓I ~
- _ f u
1 r pva J ~l 5 N fI
q
~
5TA 164+79 44 €'D'C PC~,~'~p
I I i ~ ~ I I ~ ■5'!A 10+00ck ~@ ~}~7. sn~e r I,t-ti• ~ 1
I ~ I I I I I 1 ° ~ ~sti~o+q ~ i
t- T 5N R 44E W M
~ VM1 II C! WM ~ -
SCALE Spok'Ll r Covnty APPROYEo- A L y COU iTY Rwd ?R41ECT nQ 2348 YaiLEY COIJPLEf SHEET
nCrDF'sr[.eni bi Punlic sarky RiCKr-OF-wnr PLAN
yr I I ~ 1L-'- 9.Y -,s IwSCiYfaL k lo A r i e.-a«1 ar MK1 1[Ee u,S s
`Y i~ ~ yrt~ ~e ra •i~ve~ ~mns cae~ i er ~ n r. n.*a a m 1111ERUAH RDA6 TD llNEYEASIIY A4AU
aw e.~ ~`f ~ EXPIRES 052 IQJ]°~/ raacu u a1a 4ms! ~ 2
nk'SaL ~r ~Al1 411 ~
N ~ ~ r s n~ la 5+ M~ i n S a • •
i
_ , ~ ~~~1181r A ~
NpTE klL AR~AS IV $QVARE FEET FPARCEL }'ABLE FOR R p W 5HEFi 7
x1~uf ~ r"L ~ aro { pFYAU~Fj~R ~+swr.r [v~sr aa~r
P~1RCEL TABLE FOR R 0VV SHEET
I 3 ; r~~~ t> , ~
17 iA~ AN ~A A N u+enG~R . ~ - , ~
J gFM''~ 4 Nf CQdl;i P Rm}p q)~Il 1 1 1jg~QY
~
t~tE~ IN~I '
`rM1~1~~,l`s~!~~ dL ~~~t
~
~ ~ ~',3-.r5-~',,,h.~ . ~ ~ n
i-r~
IPARCEL TABLE FOn R 0 W SHEET 2 N ~a
RM1.`r["' ~ AI1f I r91F 9ftA' .-0 4~LN ,5 L Ni i
~r , ~ 1= IF 4 P
"~r ~ ~ • ~ r}~
p ~
~y,.
V I4 ~ ~ ¢1
% i ~
1
IPARCEL TA6tE r9R R p W SHEET g3 l '
V rj
1
~2^~"~.1 NA1J I IOlki jAlk I AfL I Q 44NC F 1 CaSEtlFNT FCNS} AEi- '
r ~ .m.. ' '
i
am-
~
i
PARCfL TA9LE rQR R 4 WSHEET
~v
~ N1YF fQl YA 1 i R/ur RfuyN EASEYF4i
7'•} ~J'M ~ ' Y _ ~t - ~ 'S.nsf or~
P
prR={1 01•r
1 1'~~T , ' • ♦ n ~ ~
• LV
~";~~n_~Ir
I PARCEL TA9LE FQR R 0 W SHEET 9 i ~
~ 1 ~ ~ L ..R~ N{Yl i I! i I R R tlAm~C$ A4eVFN1 i V~l f
.•5i V r } 1 •
,R`
~ IPARCEI 7A9LE FOR R p W SHEET #41 ur ti
•+~f ~ 7 t~ FR ; tlJlh fi F C4~91 F N 1-9ylf4
I
n
.Irl
IPRRCUI TABLE FpR R Q W SHEET 91 ok
~wr w 1 ` ~ p uC f 1 AA1A 1 q!',Y 1 F[YUN 7 F 5`it NS [ry1Si Rr4Vli
i f~'Jhl}`'.'w~y; ~..9iG~~
25.~ f pARCfI 7n6LE FOP Ro W 5HEE7 5 l
' I ~ y2+~+ warl i10S11 FQ k~ 5 N uuw0 R A A
f]1 1 I ~ , f I ~1C'-R lil~ ~ q ~+r . J'{ t ~ a ~ 1
d~l I I~ c 3 w~~r~ i t P F~
q~ ..al ~rl . r~- ~~rrf7i~
~
~eY I r ~ ~ IPARCEL TAgLE FQR R 0 N SHEET R11
71 P~aRCEL 7a8~E FpR R ~i w SHEET 0 _
y~W t R_ulinCf9 f E~.ti.~r C7r+5r A;~;
E I rp7r~ A A Uai ~ N1YC i r ry A~C r A/w
~5i4 aa x TASV,41 d[[,"'ar r
~`~Yy 9 h~
C~ 6
EMif i E-ii ~ rP-[n1+faala~5i r% 1~ILu{ F{GWI Wfk PAILIL 11 Qk ~PARCEL TABLE FOR R 0r1 SHEET 43 2r
ft~e1 a 4Gw Gn iNYU5fE0 1aFR +Rih oi CiLa aiufLl 10-0t F Y:t.C IfAL FR gA 9ri1~5195 rG k tn ,~BG
ED ru~[A lill ua~AN PINYfRIr e 1J ~J 1 y 1V 9 i 3'i~j fo5 PVCwcniwuu~cisw,a,~ak t I a ra s~[ Er7I14IS9 FPG
~S9aWlnuk i kl W09CPI Pr54rIFRfIai ~'[I.i571d ~ ~ } ~oi 16. iki
4F ~J,~l19l~kwtx AR6_F9111iMI,v+051UAPIh4i1~71k~
~,E41dLi~ ~
5 iftSJStl wa ~w tw ~0115RUracc:cfr Lu.F n-df AccEd ii Gi
~ I ~i i81S9 N t G ri1CN IWJr5lS9 F~4c-C417 uui -P iFF i-ih a I iN • h .!~,iYJ [fti-~ Y
~ IIl ~ ra ; cw cN~maffu sa is Is~ i, P~sr v~rrnr~ ntua+eo i,.~ L. xE ar~~ni > eip SC~LE Spokon4 CQUflLy c ~ °T
L~UNir NQ,tp RROYCZ y0 2398 va~~r ['uP~~i ~
APPR4vED
T hif~i~7r x~cw C~ ~~E4 xrR4- a[Sr.nGd4 df' unhil[9 + L{F h S ioii&l7 -4~1_ ~ ,
Ds lma0t of P~hlis ~'arks 4+ _
l nr~ ~zikY. RIGNT-OF-WAY PLAv
T~puRo trw s~rt ei5 i~o WM uw rt4 °I' Mpi S Ke 1 9 a C"'~'rpr N
o' +~L~.! .>..f.. NOP~orf0. e n i![ xR f" [t~Elrfd 7!!L ~ OIhTY L~~CCII
I -(97 ~~Gw La OC{4 dk7. e is 18 iwlS hs 1ai ~ 43 ph I9 a atFl dI
I~C t s d 9t TN ERNaV RGa6 i9 l1NIVERS! Y R6s:)
-i n i e ki i µ `fi..~ ~!L nrnxw ` es usrL o.~ _ ~ a wn[C w K asi fee I i o~
,y-
~
n
~
t
Spokane Transit ' ~ 123Q V,zs, BOOII d /d ?J~
Spok7ne Wishrrigtort 9920, 2~86
(509)325 5000
March 4 1998 y Eb1AlL s«jspoAar~ ~-zr
' FAY (509) 325 6036
SPQ~N,E CO~NTY TJD (SOQ; 456 -J327
Provrdmg the Hrc,=hes: Or.ahr
Mr AD o 4 1aaQA8 Publrc Transponatior
~S ~ Louis Webster ~
Spokane County Plannlna $)VtS101V OF 8~~~~~O ANp
1026 W Broadway Ave ~~li~
Spokane, WA 99260
Dear Mr Webster
In response to the proposed Universrty City development, Spokane Transit Authority
offers the following comments
1 Transit pullouts and room for passenger shelters should be provided along major
arterials with associated sidewalks
2 Pedestnan pathways should be marked and clearly delineated from the curb to mall
entry
Thank you for the opportunity to comment If you have any questions, please call me at
325-6000, eYtenston 165
Sincerely,
~ r r
Christlne Fueston
Planning vlanager
sja p1an1trslfuestonlwebster2 doc
1
• L ~ 7s 4 $i
h
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE April 16, 1998
TO Louis Webster, Division of Buildm and la.niung
' 6tsotnd FROM enca Kathenrie M , &A-ter Utility
Bill Hemrrungs, Development Services
RE ZE-18A-98, Change of Condrtions, Universlty City
C C FILE ,
The proposed area covers approximately 50 acres within the Aquifer Sensitive Area This a
relatively large area in an environment known to produce low quality runoff due to the often
heavy traffic in parking lots and the subsequent build up of pollutants between storm events
Every opportunity needs to be taken to reduce the amount of runoff directly injected to the
Aquifer from sites like this A site this size with a 90% impervious area coverage would
require about four acres of infiltration area for treating stormwater At this coverage there is
more that enough open space to treat all of the runoff from the site Using some innovative
design an even higher coverage could be obtained while still infiltrating aii of the runoff per the
County design critena .
We recommend 1) denial of the proposed additions to the language relating to "208"
requirements (CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL-page2,
#8) 2) To the extent that is practical, existing hard surface areas will need to drain to grassed
percolation area (GPA) swales
C 1WINp0WS1TEMP12e18a89b doc
~ SPVKANE VAIT.LEY FdRE DEPARTME,v r
~ Spokane County Fire District 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE WA 99206-3676 •(509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 892 4125
R Pat Humphries
Chief
April 14, 1998
Louis Webst`.-
R. Dean Lyon
Jeff Forry
Assigned Planners, Public Works Division
Spokane County
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Files 2E-18A-89, 2E-18-89, BSP-56-97
Dear Sirs:
This correspondence is sent in regard to the above files and
because of a major concern that relates to public life safety and
f ire protection. Because of the plans for an east/west street
couplet and using Sprague Avenue for the west bound direction,
presents a critical need for Dartmouth to be a public street.
The Fire District needs this street so our Fire Station #1 (10319
E. Sprague) fire apparatus have an immediate change in direction
so they can head east for emergency responses. If Dartmouth is
not a through street the District's fire apparatus will have to
travel to Farr Road before turning to head east. This situation
will cause unnecessary delays for timely fire and emergency
medical (paramPaic) responses.
The Fire District officials have had several discussions with
county officials and one discussion with Architect Gary Bernardo,
owner's contact. We have been consistently told that the
Dartmouth issue would be resolved in our favor. However, a March
91 1998 memo from Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Planner, circulating the
architect's revised site plan showing Second Avenue's right away,
but still does not show Dartmouth as through street.
. r
1 r r ~ It is the District's intention to request the hearing examiner
not to allow the project to proceed until this public life safety
and f ire protection issue is resolved.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
a1/ -?h Lt wp"J--~
R. Pat Humphries
Fire Chief
RPH/md
cc: County Commissioners
Dennis M. Scott, P.E. County Public Works
Ross Kelley, P.E. County Public Works
Fire Commissioners
Gary Bernardo, Bernardo Architects
I:\OFFICE\C1\DARTMOUT.LTR
►
rptComments . ,
To• LOUIS WEBSTER (Building & Planning)
CC KEVIN COOKE (Utilities)
From JIM RED (Utilities)
Date 4/13/98
Sub3ect ZE-0018A-89 Stage Hearing Examiner
Phase
z~Cw...~~MFS JO B-3 FOR REMODEL OF
=U,CITY~CENTER
Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Util
ities "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public s
ewer connections and facilities for review
y
and approval
Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submit
ted prior to the issuance of the sewer
construction permit
Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made p
rior to issuance of sewer connection
permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and g
eneral facilities charges Charges may be
substantial depending upon the nature of the development
Any water service for this pro3ect shall be provided in accordance
with the Coordinated Water System Plan for
Spokane County, as amended
A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System
is to be constructed Sewer connection
permit is required.
Page 1
. . ,
ATTACHMENT D
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
_ 1
1 . • ~
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR ZE-18A-89 I
i ~
,
III II~I ~ DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SP~~ANE C,OtMA
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term
shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The Change of Conditions applies to the following real property:
7'hat portion of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 and that portion of the Plat of Opportunity, as per Plat
recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 24, 21, 22 and 23 in the Northeast quarter of Section 20,
Townsh'tp 25 N., Ranizc 44 EWN1, Spokane Countv. Washington, being more particularlv
described as follc.~ws:
Beginninb on the South right of way line of Sprague Av3enue at the Nacthwest corner of Lot "13-
of Short Plat No. SP-10 l 9-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85, Spokane
County, Washington; thence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along the West line of said Lot "B", 160.09 feet tu
the Southwest corner of said Lot "B"; thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., along he South line of said Lot
"B", 126.56 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot "B" and the West right of way line of
University Road; thence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along said West right of way line, 559.62 feet to the
centerline of proposed 2nd Avenue; thence S. 84° 45' 03" W., along the proposed centerline of
2nd pvenue, 203.74 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left the radius of which bears S. 05° 14'
57" E., a distance of 700.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the left,
through a central angle of 16° 15' 08", an arc distance of 198.56 feet to a point of tangeney; thence
S. 68° 29' 55" W., along said proposed centerline, 393.88 feet to the beginning of a curve to the
right the radius of which bears N. 21 ° 30' OS" W., a distance of 700.00 feet; thence along said
proposed centerline and curve to the right, through a central angle of 18° 39' 41", an arc distance
of 227.99 feet to a point of tangency; thence S. 87° 09' 36" W., along said proposed centerline,
646.08 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right the radius of which bears N. 02° 50' 24" W., a
distance of 1000.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the right, through a
central angle of 15° 51' 28", an arc distance 276.77 feet to a point of tangency; thence N. 760 58'
56" W., along said proposed centerline, 339.14 feet, to the projected East right of tivay line of
Walnut Road; thence N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said East right of way line, 596.55 feet to the South
1 ine of the North 200.00 feet of Tracts 224 and 223 of said Plat of Opportunity; thence N. 87° 09'
35" E., along said South line, 503.80 feet to the West right of way line of Dartmouth Road; thence
N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said West right of way line, 200.00 feet to the South right of way line of
Sprague Avenue, thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., along said South right of way line, 1610.04 feet to the
Point of Beginning. _
"I'he pri?posal shall comglv %4'ith the Re,ional Qusi»css (13-3) rone .:s ,inicntlcci.
. ,
r • • ~ ' r ~
4 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented
to the Hearing Examiner Vanations, when approved by the Division Director/designee, may be
permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable
uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane
County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained
5 Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for
the described property prior to the release of any building permits
6 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the
Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee
for the proJect prior to release of building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained
so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired
7 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary
8 The Division of Building & Plannmg shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a
Title Notice noting that the properiy in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall serve as public notice
of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be
recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or
in part, by the Division of Building & Planning The Trtle Notice shall generally provide as
follows
The parcel of property legally described as that portion of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 and
that portion of the Plat of Opportunity, as per Plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20,
21, 22 and 23 in the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington, being more panccularly described as follows:
Beginoing on the South right of way line of Sprague Avenue at the Northwest corner of Lot
"B" of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85,
Spokane County, Washington, thence S 02° 30' 34" E., along the West line of said Lot "B",
160 09 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot "B"; thence N 871 09' 35" E., along the South
line of said Lot "B", 126 56 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot "B" and the West right of
way lioe of University Road, thence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along said West right of way line,
559.62 feet to the centerline of proposed 2nd Avenue; thence S. 84° 45' 03" W, along the
proposed centerline of 2°d Aveoue, 203 74 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left the
radius of which bears S 05° 14' 57" E, a distance of 700 00 feet; thence aloag said proposed
centerline and curve to the left, through a central angle of 16° 15' 0811, an arc distance of
198 56 feet to a point of tangency, thence S. 68° 29' 55" W, along saicl proposed centerline,
393 88 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right the radius of which bears N. 21° 30' OS"
W, a distaoce of 700.00 feet, thence along sa,d proposed centerline and curve to the rigbt,
through a central angle of 18° 39' 41", an arc distance of 227.99 feet to a point of tangency,
thence S 87° 09' 36" W., along said proposed centerline, 646 08 feet to tbe beginning of a
curve to the nght the radius of which bears N 02° 50' 24" W, a distance of 1000 00 feet,
thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the right, through a central angle of 15°
51' 2811, an arc distance 276 77 feet to a point of tangency, thence N. 760 58' 56" W, along
said proposed centerline, 339 14 feet, to the projected East right of way line of Walnut Road,
Rhence N 020 30' 34" W, along said East right of way line, 596.55 feet to the South line of the
North 200.00 feet of Tracts 224 and 223 of said Plat of Opportunity; thence N. 87° 09' 35" E,
along said South line, 503 80 feet to the West right of way line of Dartmouth Road; thence N
!
!
f r ~ 02° 30' 34" W, along said West right of way line, 200.00 feet to the South right of way line of
Sprague Avenue, thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., along said South rigbt of way line, 1610.04 feet to
the Point of Beginning is the subject of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing
Examiner on Apri129, 1998, imposing a variety of special development condit►ons. File No.
ZE-18A-89 is available for inspection and copying io the Spokane County Drvision of
Building & Planning.
~
!
.
~ ti ~ ' ' • .
Amended condition for Division of Engineering and Roads
dated April 16, :998 Engineering condition #2.
The applicant and Spokane County are currently negotiating
the required right-of-way for the Valley Couplet and
Dartmouth Road as shown on the adopted Right-of-Way Plan for
County Road ProDect No 2396 A copy of the approved plan
is attached to these conditions shall be referrea to as
`Exhibit A'
.
.
• . ~
Y
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENPINEER'S CONDITIONS QF APPRQVAL"
TO Spokane County Planning Departmen
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE April 16, 1998
PROJECT: B-3 CHG OF COND
FILE ZE-0018A-89 /
Hearing 04/29/1998 Q 10:30 #2
Review Date @ #
Sponsor/Applicant GARY BERNARDO
Section Township Range 20-25-44
Planner LOUIS WEBSTER Technlcal Review Date (06/12/1997 @ 2 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County
Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Pr03ect/Road Improvement
District, whichever comes first
1 Applicant shall deliver for acceptance by the County Engineer a clear
and unencumbered right-of-way deed for University Road which was
constructed in conjunction with CRP #2298
2 Applicant shall dedicate the required right-of-way for the Valley
Couplet and Dartmouth Road as shown on the adopted right-of-way Plan
for County Road Project No. 2396 A copy of the approved plan is
attached to these conditions shall be referred to as `Exhibit A'
3 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans
5 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site
sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire
project o r portion thereof if the development is phased.
CC Applicant GARY BERNARDO
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner LOUIS WEBSTER
Page 2 of 5 ' ' •
f 04/29/1998 06/12/1997
ZE-0018A-89
6 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
7 Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
8 No direct access be allowed from lots to the Valley Couplet right-of-
way until the Valley Couplet is constructed and established by the
Board of County Commissioners and an approach permit is issued by the
County Engineer.
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
10. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, lncluding
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The appllcant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
12 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards
- ''~1 , 4
i J + , , ~ ~
, ~
I ~s r ~ v R' ~da
_ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _
A Y E1 Y U~ _ 19+54 76 ~~nRbaU~lik RUA ~ ~ ~ _ SPr~AGU~ _ _ ~ _ - ~E SpRaGUE AYE++UE ~ _ ~ff ~ m y
_r _ ~ ~ ,._~~e ~?g5 28 `~5iA ~ _ --'r STA ~SA 19+2~ 69 `~y: ~59 38 YS 5T4 0A 19+a9 1S aF'rsEr 4000 a = -V I . ~'S.
s ~ a „ « ~ -.QFFSkT +UGO L r„ IJS I s u7 ~s 4 ~ ~ I ~ ~ sra o~ rI.~.,~ . ~ aL
r a s~F~r'ia o~~ I i o~s~r 9rurr ~ 1+
W _ S~G ~0 T ~5N R. ~~E.1~ M ~ ~ ' z _~Y_R_ - I ~ _ - T t ~ • R
~ ~ ~ ~ . - ¢i ~ i ~f0-14~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~+3~014311} ~ ~
~~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ~i ` k ~ I
~ ~o d ~ ~ sra an if~z; ~s ° ~ LO`
a~F~r ~a sa ~ ~~i ~ ~i
-~~~Q ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ` p■y y❑ I P'l~~' i r
~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ I - ~ ~
4 g
~ I ! ~ " I
~ 4~ ~ i ~ ~I s , ~x f ~ I ~ ~ ur
~ ,~i~ ~ ~ l. ~ -i
U , ~ ~ ! , ( s~at ~.,s} }
. {5202 0195~ i ~ ~ ~ I i M I ~ ~ ~ ~
~f _ ~ l~Pl . TOFAL VIEW pF PARCEL~ $~LQW i ~ l Y' I _ "..,z 7l~-
~ ~ J~OT Tp SCA~~ r ' I ~ _ ~ ~ a ~ . I
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I L~GEND ~ ~ I t ~ I ~ 4 y I E IP 1 ~ .
(FR1J9C CflITEP 1i169 Op 6Ld 41C 4GNiS ~ PiIOP-05f~ [EHRA LIMEs ` I I i . ~ I oKn~c o~.~ru~s i I i I w [ r=- r ! - ~I
PWlA9r8 ~i ~ ri~~ UhES ~ ~ : ~ I ! I I Pw~d'~r 9d ~ui L~M[s ~ i ~ °~~~~5 ' tJRVE T~BLE I ' 1 stC+Kw,~as _ E ~ ~ _ a I 7• I -
~ ~f a~ Muuw+S a ' cua+~ a~, ST+~n4N I PT Sian~ I RAOIUS ~ GELfA ITF7JGEkT LENG~i ~ ~vs ~0.m. ~ ~ c~~r~~'°" a~xu~f ~a~S i i I F{~+2390 I s~4+aae9 ~}tlOQ60 ~ 1552'13"~ i3aSA 27s 89 E I ` V C) ~ l
yi~~r f►#ad++~ uk15 ~ i06~ 40' 1552'13" 149 31' 294 72 j ~i ~ ~ pLVfJV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f V spNyray~ura ~[p~or ~ uaa~Ep 3 I 95~ rJ0 ~~fi'55 28 I 7 75 19 5~ ' j io-i, r F I I ~ I
j ~ }~4+]0'~0 I 132+4& 97 ~ 1U00 ~0 ~ 1531 28' ~ 139 I j7~ 77' o-~ ~ ~ I I p~'L taa4E~ - ! 4~6 d0' 0935'50' 78 ' 1' 7' ~ ~ I I ~~1-41~ µ 5 I I 59 I Sa B ` ~ I I
6 ~ i039~0 ~Oa~D94~ ~i~Y ~ 29t ` A I 7 ~QS! dD M~0'26' ~ 03 I6 2~5 05 ~ ~ ~ ~ I e.ua w~ ~I I I i I ~ ~ f s ~
~ I I 1039 40 Oi ~5'23 1 }7 d4 ~ SA 9] ~ - ~ ~ I ~ Glt+1LRL~'E ~[xaS7v14 Po~II_ h'4QVR RO f ~ ~ I pi-NAY &`,sRJa;/p~FNCL ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 1a1~ OQ a2'25 58 G 220fi { 4410 I I M
€ 10 I ~ I°.'S ~a I 02 45 d2 I 22 5S ~<y,i 1 ~ ~ ~ 5p 0 50 1~p I ~ f ~ S ,
$CkLE ~h~ fzC~T STA QR f7+8A56 ~ a„ r.rw. r.. a, ~yu,, aF~'sEr i6 s"o ~ ~ } a~a ! ~ I` ~I q' ~ /5. ■
I i - _ ~ < < ~ i '-'R ~ ~~A 1~1+7~;80 ~ - F
1 , G OPFS~T 6~?~ ~ ~ , - in ~ ~ ~
# 5Y~ OA 11~83.74 ~ ~ - ` ^ „ L1F i _ L_,_ - ~ z~go ~ _
cua~ ~ ~ ra i~~+4i ~ r ~
~ CUAVE ST0. 1i5+68.7 3 ~ ~ ~J a OFFSEi 61 pQ ~ ~ f sra ,~a ~ aa 5275 23og1 q ~ AI.I~~Y
51 E 1~~+~q ~ri_ OFFSET 541]0 L Oh'~'SET b4flQ L P~y ~h H87'U& i t~Fr f~ 0 7' ~ ~ a x ' 9~~8< - ~ ~ sTA aa 12+eo84 OF:5`7 2&50 R ti
q ` SiA 1S9r~Od52 ~je ~ 2 ~ ~,ti OFFSET 8~ ~a L ~ x m WRVE 13 4~'F ~ ~
~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 i ~ ~ sr~ +sa+~~ m ~ ~ ~ ~5205 2A8~ ~SEi G~ nn 4 ~ STA }~3+A+.75 ~~p,~ 5
~ 1 ~«r sg~ R ~,8~~ ~ . ~SY4f 09~6 58 a tUR4E ~5 ~ (4530t Z3d4) ~
x _.~~-~.~--"~r-_~~j~ ~ ~ S ~ {a52a19519} {1~Q71 a ~ S ~~31 ` ` ~ ~~5201 fl327] 1~~ a 7~ ~ 2A 5 j 1 r rTY ~ Sin 14++76a8 ~ STA_ GA ti+SO 8f ~ ~OFT5ET 20 54 A - -
d ~ U~i SEF ]g Gq R ~ STA 151+52 94 P~ VALLE'f COl1P~'{ j , i ~ + ` ~ ~~320~ 4528~ a iA 1+DD Y m ~ 5 a a~RwWfh R0~ ~ ~ p r
, {~D3~ ~ ~ STa t1d5+4.f55 ~ ~q4 CURVE 1; r30-~C9 " ~ r ~ 1~02 ° r y~'y , ~ , 4 ~ w m I }57 p2 Od5 : 4 ao e ~ 1~p.~~ ~SZO~ 06~~ +CJf ~PA AA ti~.';,+~5
y ~ 0. ~ p i 5'a 1;fi+97 33 ~ Q~ ~ C3 9 ~~~1 ~45xQ105t3~] La'FSEr 39flo Kr ~ t,iR~ ~ G FJFFSEf 28 SO p ;8 ~a
f r I~-_ _---v..- Q' y 1 , 457a2 QB01 mm~ lo- „s 47 ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~10^0.S~ I ~ ~ t.. - - I~ G~ ❑ i i~ T ~ Y I~ CURVE 19 (452012305) ~
~;524t9~22 ~ ;5 1 I$ ~ P ah ~ ~ R' - ~ ~s Si9 6t ,SiA. 145 3.~ Q~ ~ ~ I ~ u 3y UG►5ET 39 40 R,,~ r i ~ t ~ "~t
~ , I ~h/ / I, { ~ x~, $TA 151+30.98 f ~ ~ $7A i51fy$ 77 /or-SET 5a op L
i ' ~ tlKFSEi 3940 R s~h ~ „ ~ p 17503 ~ sT , _ _ ~ ~ E E. ~ tta1A) CF I LURVE ~ <
- f~~ ~ ~ f ~~~r~~ a .sza~~~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~S. ~ ~ t - I I I F , a~+~ ~r ' S akane Count ~ 4 , 1
^ B Y& x i r ,2~~~ ScA~~ ~ Y APP~DVED cau~rr aon~ P~a,~~cT r~o z3ss ~ ~ ~„g„~ ~r Departmenk o~ Public Works ~I H-
~ I I f r M c w~ R e v i21~~ 1"~50 10~6 1Paal Br4edray Avs P~hs t~ Ca~'rR.1cT ~cl ~ T~~"'wA~ p Kar~orrrnt. ~HIERMAN ROAp TO UNlVER`. ~ ~ ~ ~ I~~ SFiEET no 6! F~1 AENS14N$ Checked 9y &pokaar Yf,~ 992d0-817p r - - - - - c~e~ ~u iz.~~ Hra ~ _ o nn~~ ~X~f~E~ ~ ~E~~ fi ~ r r GA la~ ar I Aeulawn YERSICN (~9) 56 ~ 4 I B O.JEC Ho 9E-032 (~C r+ I - i
ns IDoSsl9 IC r , _ _ ,
~ - =
i• ~1 li I~i I
■
~
~ ~ ~h - ~ ~
MaiCHLVHE TO SH~ET No 10 _ ~ ~ a
- - I 10 ~ f ML1N4 TD S~iEEi Na 10 S~A. i53+Q0 ~ - _ - ~ ` ` 1
I~IATC r ,--r ~ . ~ ~ I l l { ` ~ ~ ~ 48-09 j I r cy I i I
a~ ~ se ~ ~ I I
~ V ~ i y 1 I i ~ l I
~ (,~~x} 1 { ~ 1 ~ !
s~a, us34) ~ I I I ~ r C s~a i5 as oa + to-~s ~ ~ ~ 4FFSET J9 00 R + ~ ~ ~
~ c S~ ~ ~ + i~t$ 452pt p30B ' ~ io-1~ f ) i ) I ~r ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ` ` ~ ~ ~ P (.sioi a~os) ~ss~o~ ~~aF) ~ I ~ I
r n-~ I 4 f ' a ~ ~ ! ~iS~Ot O6 I~ ` p I ,
5~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ It ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ • 7 ` I `
r T 9 ~~+gd ~ STA 155a3a 4t y ~ ' ; ~F%~l 34 W A , ~ ~FFSEY 5{ QO L I
r I l ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~
_ - -ti ~ ~ 1 ti ~ _ - ~ 3
I , ~ ~ l r _ _ - I I i ` ! ~ ~ ~
V 4 ` 1 j ~ 1--- I , ~ ~ ~a
I ~ I ! I ~a ~ ,Y, _ r~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ I ~ i I ~ ' ~ rti~ i 1 ! 7 € ~ I
1 I r,~, ~ ~ I ~ (1,_a,,) I I--- ~ „ ~ i ~ 4 w I G~' ~ ~ f ~ ~ t ~J
l ~ ( s ~ b i o~~~) I~ ~ I ~ - ~ ~ - r I~ 3 v I~ I
~ I I ~ 4 ~ I v ! ~ `~e'} AI /~lJ~f ~ ~
~ r r~ s . ~ E~~ L~ l L~ I~ R 4 T~. T Y.~ ~ I Z ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ z I
~ w ~ ~ I i ~ I~ I 1 r 4 ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ l I
~ ~ LEGEND ~ ~ ~ S I I
, ~ [M~s,w~ aMrEa ~.ES ~t ao +~k~~ - ~ ~ I , - ~ ~ aaovos~o rt++r~ ti~s ~ ~ ` I ~ RuNa+O A~ff CdWwxr~uruES 4 I ~
~ V i I PRGPfl~O Rld+i p~ NFY Wi[S I ~ STA 158rSS 05 I ~muEFSNiP EnES ~
9 OFFSfT 39 ~ R ~ I s~crwh u.vrs I I 7/~ SC[r4k LRrE4 ~ I ~ +l~a uc~wn ~e,as ~i1-04~ ~ac = ti5a+~a5 cc~+smurficm ~-ua icr[s ` I ~,~---`-Y
I yiNir Eag[4Ehf lL1~S p ~ ~ r' i L~Ql1R ROAC] ~ 52p1 477} ~ C P 1 J P 0 ~ 1'ti t ~ ~ ~ Si7~ 159+5305 ~ ~
~ STA 159+4'~ i8 I CIIk I OFFSCT 64 4G L {9M5'~l~C~l vE~ws 4inC vaoR:A `d I ` Q~i pGFSEi ]400 fd ~ ti 0 ~ PxeLEL AuVE[~ ~D~QD~ ~ S r~+'!
~ ~ , ~ I ~ 9L4Ck ++U~AC~ ~ I I
I ~ - ~ y CURVE 2 ~ ~ ` b~ ` ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I
r ~ f 5Q 4 5p 140 ~j c~ E 1 ~ 1A' ~4i~g A, SCaLE [r~ F.~7 ~~u ~ ~ i -I as co ~
~ ~ ~ 1 n~~ - ~ ~ ~ ..c~1 ~ f I f ~ Ua ~ , ~ i
f ti.~~q ~UR" ~ CURII~ TAB ~ I 7 0 ~ ~ ~ P 9 o t I ~ r-~ , l cuRU~ ~ I p c srnna~ ~ p t stnnan ~ R~o~us ~~~ra ~ Turc~Nt ~~¢Hcn+ a I
~ 4°'~ ~f f p CuRVk 1 I R I 739 ~ I pa'II3+ I 771~ I 5+79 '~+5 ~ I ~ - ~ ~ r~~i~ ~ ~ ~ < < - r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I § I 739 aa' I oa~sa oo' 1 6 a3 I i2 , y ~ ~
~ ~ Tj ` ~ a+a~ 3 I f I 739 04 I}3~9 flS I 97 ~7 I 1T3 9ti s~„~ I 6 ~ G1 ~ t• i~ ~ I # I 535 oa I~e39 atir ~ ~oe 5G I za1 ~5 ti~,f' ~
~ t F ~ CURVE 1 P 5 ~158+5395 { 16G-8105 I 7pppp' ~ 1SI9a1"d 11501 I 22794 30 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ I I ~STn ~6Ur81 {i5 _ - s k ~ ~11-[~7~' l.Ji ` i0~ CFF5ES 64401. ` ~ ~
~ ,ti.y ~ i ! _ ~lAFCx~INE TO SHEE~ Na t x ~ ~ ~ <s2oi a~~o ~ ~ ` y i
~ 1 _ i ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~I I ~n ~ ~ - ~ r~ b ~ s r ~ ~ . i
~ x.. _ ~ su~~o~e, as ~ a b~l ~ - - ~rr~ ~9 oa ~ ~ m ~,o ~ pF ~ A sf~ t~' ~ ~ ~ i } I I ~ 1 ~g 15 ~ +y ~
i ` Sj~, ~ ~ ~ i I r; 1~ ~ p ~
~ 1 ~ y ~ 12-Ot t~4 ~ o E ~ - SN~~ , ~
~ j4 ~ ~E L«'~- - H ~ I ` ~ ~ ~,p,~~ 4r i
~ - ~ 175~3 ~ ,
r 5 T ~ ~ . ~ ~x n,~ _ sc , ~ p~~ a ~,<< ' C~ n R ~~CT ~o ~~96 VALL~Y COl7P r aex nw~ '
I I I ° a a we K T F,zi~7 ],E 5pokane Caunty APFRDV~D COUt~ OAQ ~ft4 lE SHE~~ I ~ ~i 1~ ar~ment af Publ►e Warks 1'-OF-WAY PLA~I &a~ ~Y F ~ PLAH5 & C NTRA ER OUi+TY Eh I ~I~~ iE~~ ~
I I c w~ R e u s~in~ Ho~oh~u. ~=5o sazs eat Hrme4 y AK y~ THIER~i,~N ROAp TQ LINIVERSITY R4AD ~ ~ ~ I 5EE SMEET Me. 73 F#~ AE~`~DN N~7~S CAecked $y Spvkoor ~A, 9ffae4-6l70 E~~~~E~ {„l~l L~i~ ~ ~ate a SIR. ~ROuECP No 8E-032 (OUSJ-1 -0~- of 1 "3 I
~o I 6n~~ ~u I C~d IAap~' I kens~an ~ G wd~ C N 1~I97 y~~~ N/A {yoaa +58-~694 , ~w~ ~ r a sh' r ~ . 7J dlL~~ I
i
~
' ~ ~ a ~ ~
~ Na 11 MATCHLlNE Sf3 SKEETT ~
~ - - ~ ` ~
~ - ~ 1
~0 ` ~ ~ ` 6~ ~ i I ~ t ~ ~
1~ ~ ~ No 6q1 16-17 ~56-14~ ~ a n~ I ~
~H~~ g y ~201 250~ ~i5201 Z3(14~ y[~ ~ ~Q 5 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ 1f)U ~~4. ' ~ ~f ~
~ ~ ~ I e~' 1 c ~ ~ : _ t 1 ~ ~ i
_ ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ r~~~a~ I
~ ~ - ~ fi ~ ~ ;~t.. ~ ~ ` 1 ~ r~ ~ rti ~ ~ ` I , ~ ~ ~ 1 .,}a ~ i
{ ~ ~ _ - t i ~ 3 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~a I 1 4 i I ~ 1 srR ,~a«saae ~
~ 1 ~ DFFSET fi440 L ~ ` ~ ~ ~I 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ , ~ E ~
J ~ I ti ~ ~ ~ i I I 1 ~ ~ ss ~ I , O E ~
i ~ ~ ~ { k I r.~.. ~ t 1
~ 1 3 ~LI\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ LE 5 ~ ° 1 1]~ Tl~ 15~+53 62 Ex~S'mc cEh~[R w~ts fR 0.6 +w~'►a~FhiS - I ~
Y I ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~~P ~3 ~ $174 16~#218g 1 l L ~ Cp5 iNC Po~i OC auY lih[S Il ' I ~T~34 00 ~d 3 ~v~a~vo5~[L ~s G' .ariu~as ' I
~ ~ ~`'f ~ ~ ` ~c~ ~ ~cs""`S - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o $TA 16i+96.7Z ~ i +p Stt~ t~.ES - -
~ "f4 r ~ L ' +/~e s[tner~ ur~s -LL'____' ~ 1 V I ~1 ~ ~ PCRYAhEhSEAS~tlcN} lWI4 I j 1 ~ ~s,a~c~ P~~f ~~s
~ ~ ~ d~; i a C.A f~ p~YL4~ IriES ~ l ~ 4 • +~193 ~ ~ CJn9~~Pi aLanl uNC vP•Ea a„a ~ ! ~ ~
I ~ ~ 16~' ~ "r Cl1B+~ ~ a ~ 06-001 I LF1 ~ pG ~(1 ~6 ~ ! ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ / ~ ~ 9L9[If MlYFLP Oy f ~,yf ~ ~ ..f 1
~ i ~ b 1 ~c~s~~tt i- N50ti000 ~ i I , ' I ' ~R ~ r
I E~ ' ~ I ~ 0 ~ E , ~..__s l ~ 1 6 51A 186i13,54 ~ } ~
~ d OfFSET 39 00 R ~ , ~i 1 ~ ~ 1 ~12-47~ p ~ 54 ` Q 50 10~ I ~4 "r l[pR 2 ° "~~AC~ IN FEET I
I N~ ~ ISMI 0933 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ se , ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ i ~~1R11~ TA~L~ ~ ~ ~
STA If86+i9 TB 1 I ~ r R Cl1RV~ P G$TAi10N P T STASIOH RA(fIUS ~ pEtTA I 7AHCEHT LEHG~F! ~ ~ OxiS. t 3900 I ~ i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ V 36~ 1 CuBVE 1 { j I fi5i 96 1 71'2d s2 ! fi5 85 170 8B I I ti.l ` ~ ~6; g} 2 I 1 M 66i GO I~~'a~" Y 2 95 5 90 I
Z I RS - 166+T3 9 3 I p ~ 16u000' I 18J410 Y~6~ 73 33555 ~ I I t ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t6a+]+93 d lfi&r73~9 I 7000Q ~ is'i5R8 # 9995~ 19$58 ~
` y STA 1 fi.73 d9 ~ t ~ ~ ~ pFfSE i' g.] oR B ` r~ ~ ~ ~ s~c ~a 1' ~5~ ~.~4E w ~
~ ~ ti ~ ..t ~ i I ~1 ~ ~ f, ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~12-02~ ` ❑ m f~ ~ }
1 a ~ ~so, oa.i~ f: m <<~~s ! ~ 4
I I 'j 4 ~~J441 I i ~ ~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ r ~v
V ~g 2 rr t~ ~ 5tA 17+a710 uH1V~R5iTY RO ` ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ I~ STA 968~8da26 r'•~~ = f~ $ F R A C l 1 E A V f N U E S t I
~ i ~ pFFSES !B 2~ L ~ ~ S E C n A~+ C p R H E R ~ SiA t_Bt1fi.39 ~ ~ ~ 1 I I OFFSE 53 OQ R ~ ~
~ ~ 55' I ~ STh 1 d+7341 E ! i
I ~ I 'oFFS~rf aaa, R I I ~ ~ y^~_~~_-~_r I 1 ~ ~B ~~~~~L~~~ - -
~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ _ ~~_-~T-Y-,~ 51SY ROA4 ~ ~ U~11WE'R
~ ~ tS~QO ° ~ , U LII~E _ ~ ~ r~ - f r~~ a,]^4 z ~ ~ ~~i] 1
.~1 5a2'~b49~ ~ ~ , tia-~aa ~ e SO?3Ra9~ ' 7~710 ~I ~ a i SDT~ <9 E I m 1
~ ~ T * r - , 5+00 , ~ - ' y~ ~ ~ \ ~ r ~ t , r ,
~ _ ~ - ' ~ r h St► U 15f~441 ~ i ~ ~ < s 9FFSEi R`~ ~ ,
w~ $1A u 1~+5&8T t y ! s ` '1 ~ : ~ \ ~ ~ ~J ~ ~fi ' T' ~ ~ ~ _ I .TO JD I + ~ I Y QFf$ET 35 DO + ~ ~
/ i ~ SiA u l5 G893 ~ `'J y ~ EN~ OF PLAN ( , R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I q pF~SEI ~ 90 STa U~7+i7i6 {SSO ~ 5T~ ass~-39 44 y~ ~-y 1 QFf5f1 68.90 R ,
.7d' ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~Y V I?-G3 ~ ~ ~ ' j^ Q~ G' ~ ! I ~ ~ I h ~STA 10 0 ~f 4 ~,2-~,) ~ G I ~ ~ ( ss,~ waz) I~ ~ E
1 ' I C ~ (asz,~a<~e 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ I V l
i s .,T 5N R.44'~'~ M i ~ , i ~ ` ~ i ti _ i ~ ~
I ~so E ~ d ~ 4 A ~ ~ r ; ~ 1 ~ 1150~ ~ i ~ ~ + ~J f+ I < < ~ rT[ ti
6 ! ~ ~ r I I I ~ y~ 3 I L~ r r qaV~ i7la~C ~m1r ~ ~ ti ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' + . a~+~ b n~~ ul NTY R A OJEC~ NQ 2396 VA~~EY C4GP~~T ~ i ~ a I R a~~~iT v, ~ Spckane County APPR~VED CaU 0 b FR SHE~T I ~ A~ Depa r t m e n t o f P u b t s c ' W~ r k s I~- Q F~ W R' Y P~ A I~ iEET
I { - ~ P L 3 M 3 & C~ A E N G I N E E R o CuLItT shC i, R I I I_ ~ w~ R a~'~19' s+a~xax~rAr 1= So 10_fi i~ral Hrood.ap Ave TFiIERMpM RQAD TO UNiVERS~TY ROAD Chre4ed 8y Spokane MA. B926Q-4170 _ _ Q f~~ Z SHEE1 Na 13 rOR RE~ISI~W HQiCS J- Ont ( ~~prRES a~ L6 PRO.,fCt Ne SE 0]Z OQ3 1 - I 9 I~ ~W s ~2~~~ r ( l .ofL,3
G N 12/97 ~J 1`A (5{f6) ~58-~800 ha I OnLe I 9v Ckd IAvvr I Rr'~7~on - . . ~ ~ ^LO u• ~ llae"~i~ ~ ~ Jfsa~ t
~
i er•irr ~.o eou _
~ ~-i~on a[o-~5 ~N 133'flb4 9 ~ G °4°9 15§19PlSO 53![idx3 7 0 008C-eS4 6GS} 1Y7i1}I3A ~~~r~++f! yl~99YC~K,71 ^8 I ~1°6 I°V ~-~4~ I I ~ Q s V/ n~ a81t N~~~ a - - T~. +.g I ~ti~k i °y 7 9; f 6! 8~18 ~
L£ l ~vo~ ui5~3n~Nn ol ~vvr+~3~H1 ~ r ozro-ogzaa YK ~~4~~s ~s p~~~~~ ~ie~i 7~sard ai M a ra-e~ a~aov ~t e s~~s c~-s 'tt-s n~arnrE r~ a~~~ e; cweWS ~ ~ a. a ZV18o~uH n ~M ~~~d ~ d73xI~~C3 hiNfl#~ ~r~ ` f ~L33YI91~i Y SNr'1d Y+~a,p cig ~sox p~4i tl/N E51i ~9 P~I~ 6 3' 8L ~fk5 5v3bv a3lnadn Mla ~3r~bllvd53a 3Mna31r~37 o3lvadn! ' k ' ~i ~~--l.H~I~ i ,i,~ SS~.t~~ aqqnd ~Q ~ua~~seda~ zE~uot ~.rs 5Y3tf'd 01YOdfl MIN 63r14IlYlS3a 3NI1~31M33 ~31tlOdn N~~M~!jHI~fiI}4IIlI Z ~ s~l~~!#1II lI L
~1~~~15 131df10~ R~ll7h $6~Z ON 1~3~'O~d Q70a ~1Nl1D~ ~ Q~A~~dd~' ~sno au~e od ~Z~d~S a~~ dr~v+~e~ , ~ 7 ~ K S ~e ~~Q~arr~aavs 3~~0 3rv~ e~nori3a ~nuva~n ~5 is~ e~~ si~s a~vt~n H~tM~l ~ a~l 8614~1~ I~ fY.4~le]o ti' Y11M /kj J 311 9619LIL I ~ j >1Is'~I14 tr
~l-ti ~ 41-~ 5v3a'~ flN7 3N11 A1~3d4ad ~3lSfCaVI N~~►A ~I ~~I S 911~4 4 y ~I i cfl r9rs i~i ~g['9i ! rt+r.a sa 1 ~lH~O~ 3ks~3~ 551n SGISY ISL-9 pp-ll 0300V lD-IR 3wi1 ua3d0aa a~i5f~'0'dk N atM'~ j~I ~ 9~ s S ~ r 4E II l >Y~4~id~tL9 I LL ~~~I l~ ~T~ YRq ! A3Nj At'Rj Idc~pl LFGn 16~5> I sl-J ~ i j 'A 1$ p -L(I s
iu~c ar I~p tr4'[e I ao ns`ce i d~li3 ~~w~adl ~$3'd'~p~~a ~~i-u 03-8 ~ l9-B 5V3~1 11Y~a3d 3dO1G ~Ntl 3rb'1 N~ 4 a 031YOd11 N 9~~A 3 NI Bfi~CI`d I 9 ~ 592 1 II 19 B~ Sfii'"6i 1 bl ►SB'l 6}d'~j 5'37"fY~y l R F!I 416P ZEL~I v0-tl I ~N ~ !I i rr fS9 ~~9 I ! ft ~ S8-l~g 1 d~tl5 ~ni,di i~SAlfi~Sr [~~4 ~ ~ Q~ ~Hyl ~f Q~d~~ H~iM d~I Sfi15lIL ~ I - ~ ~ ~ ~ - f Z 5133H5 5tl3![~' 11V~a3d 3d~15 I SC~'I n p rpr~-dat 1~350'~ az~+t~obi ~~n ui~ ai~sa~nir+~i ~~i~'rs~F~r o-rt ~ i onoer~~ i ~ no ~sei + d~o3 jniedi tosaibi~v~ u-p ~ A 86/CI`d I 9
I .GZ n i+ " 9i eG i e S~q - ae saa-~si ~ MnoS .~r v~fi~5i ifaa iazs►~'t~-~G ~ ~~sr ii oS as~'~~ I - I oD~S~ i ~ i,y~uar~v hAS4yYFl71tl~ 94 6 S6E5f d~-s l33~S a~ [I-t 13~avd n~~530 ~3aatl4 N D~M an a~ ~61~~1i 9 rrs 3i ii o6 ~rr'►t ~ a6 s~r. ~ ae ~ce'rr i e?> i~ta ~Hi ~a~a t~5r i~~i-~ i ~BS~a p _ u rt ~~6 ts~ ~o a~i o 1 ►L 9Z6'6S'L i wknr i+5kay~ ~~,Hti~6~5'I~~~ot~r i9-i~ ~ _ Cl~B Al~l3dD~3 ~ 21 d f1 aQ'J tl3Nb" 3YPo'1 4300VI N JfN~"~; ~ JiI 66ISZIZ I 5 iF-s 1- t n ~ii ~6J£~/2 9
i~ a 3 d i S N O~ 1 r+ 3~ v 3 5 r 3 I ~ N 3 a~ ro~~ I i~ fd ~ v 3dv ~v1 Q1 1 3 r~' b' N I ~,m~+~d ~ ..°r°~~ u e g o+~~ a~ i c i ti. b ~ ~ a~► r E~ e~ i e 5 r` f~ ti l ~ 8 8 2 6~ S ro~ a o-~ ~ ~ - - FS BsC~[i I DO 04i - i sg arr'Gi i~ n~'~?n $~p,~ so~t~ zg~sr ~o-~ ~[b-41 13~~lvd h"~i5~~ t~ 'd3ae iv1Q! ~315f~aVf N~~hd ~n a~fi lSZ 1'Z i O~ 4 iik6 i~o sc~~~~ ! aQ ss - i ~b~af~ 91 ~ x~faG.Mi r?~~ e6~~v i~o~4 i'0-Gt 13~~vd V3~a iir~a3d 3dO15 0300v1 N~~M"~ ~ 711 96IZI£ I I~ ~ l~ I~~HS Nh ~ ~ ~0~ ~lAb'1 ~1~~~~d - , - I €t~~i ~ x~arr.Hi su~a~~~5►i~~ ~ ~l e6{SLI~ I s 26l~Z/z i o i
ifi tto s~ f ri ii~ r~`t'~ ~ J~ Y•. - -y - ~ avd a3~N3a N D M~'M ~I 8615I~ I Z~ SsB li ii g~nsr wz ie~ ~ u~CS t~ I 1 ~~aHr]p _dSfidl flk3~SN~111 id~~ ib«~ i~o-Q i 90 ~ 50 tr CA~4 NO 5v3ab ~3~NI7N3~ 3' 37~tl1 3~ ~ f_; ~ 9$l II II ~(l~ifi~{~ ~ Lp ZCS ~ 4,L Z§~~Of 3 H~~v~ ~r s t~~rv ~AxwF, i tz~a ~a<<r ~ ro--~~ ~ ,--~Ir li b~j~{}S~j~~ Y~ dfi I flGd~~~5 l,11NY~ rl~5 ~l1VK~ ~ JH3FII~S~ !Q'4~Z6lStr ~ t~-a ~ at-~ wo 5a3~a a30Nivn3a ~P 1~~a3d ~xvi'13a~pd tl35v+3af w~rM ~n~ al ssl~~lC i C{ A m~ eslzA ~ < < 6 N 9615142 I z ~
- oDd ~ r~ OD84fi'B ~ Od'a~ ry 00004 6 ~~~1YH~ hdiF~l~ zc_a ~e~Sv ~ta-s I OQS II II fSb09CC I BI9 ~I [1Sd~B~; ~ S9 ~~rr~2SC`,rrii i1tC419~"50 -E~ ll►`Z I - } I I~I ~ ~vt6C II II 10'Sf~6~B Zd&46 I ~ia}ygqg ; w,iql R~~e .hlYl] I ~PI~IflZSr IZ4-~I II 6&SIB~93 ~ I 10TQ~~ ~ ADpAOLI f tleal5ld~JdS 5Y~a1 4Qt4"515411~~°J I I I { 5; A 'DI sslZLlC i Cl JI M ~ ~
s~c u ai Sr- hu n re ia~so i io--~i Jllr►~+M 1SWJ~~I 1h3W35tl3 II kl30NIVW3i! ?1 tl3~itl `1V101 31~v~1 i,ii~r~dte ~ x^s~~~G E acr-~s~i i st~L~'ri ~~oxi al~st~ i o a I I I I ~llr~a3d l5N0~~~ 1N3~t35v3 II d3flai~w3a i h1/a ~ 73t~'Q 1q1~1 ~ 3n~~ ~~"`s~ehrw +~s+~ ~ ~ ~ I 4l 9# ~~3H5 M~~ aD~ 379'd.l 13~~dd ~ I I I r~~ { 5l
~l ~33~15 M b~~p~ 318~`l 1~~~~'d i i ~ ~~t ~ I I I I-I Is~' I 9l I fCl
M y~~ ~ 6_f Oli_' S► i 5 6 9'Ci I YS' fl~~Z6r 1r13 3NSNItlpln I~0~~ Z~ISr 154s~ 0~£ i il ~4 Wl I LIDfi~'6 I 2i'LtS'i11 I '7iii k q J.l15a3A~1~11 SUCZ 14Z5o I IF . ~ B9l-9 II 7~ ZB'R90~~'4L' ~ t'67A~'$~ ~ SC lSfi iF4' ~~i_74YMii32 N xAeIC~ -Avtl~'~ I IOt6 2&ISf I r~-S ~ f QZ fr8 l P 6; E"p'~, q I w5~ 6009 ~I'~tt6t1 I 5Ni 'k.~~ hl5tlahiH~ ~ sUft IOt~6 r9l-6i4 II I~ `~g~LSC I sonos i L9CL0~5~~~!~~'dh~~H xHaVA '~Cd~l~ i ZS~b26i r fC0'S i I lt -I 16 L
i t~}'§ ii i~ sa~~6~i Bti'St1~1 6t s'g~ ~ri ~,irixiiSr;nnni ea;aiazsais~- ~i syy - - "~5{v a"t~a~~i~o- za- , ~ u► 5z6•iB~ ~~9 ~9a ei ~ sa 4as~n r ~iudi53b I 4 I I ~ ~ I ZZ i 9,~,~ ~i u srsz~zr i tta~iz c§ees~~'~"s~l ri~i_'~~r iermnrL,ie~toA iat~a iri-'a -~'tcy.~i bi .,..4 ~ ~H ~3a ~ci~i flri6tsj~r i~- i t„t u ~~t rtt I oaEaer i 5~s~55'et~ ~H~ aii~Al~sa~+i~wn t14ylOZS7I~il-Ol~ ~~aa~~~S ~ t~9i'~ 659S99SS 5. a~s ~ Ivz ~ I LL
i 55c'i u ~~o i i r-~ w i u t- e ti-a~i 111Y~+3d i5N0al~ 1N3Y435h'3 ~M a3ar~ivrr~a I M,~a ~tl3klY lt+lOlE 31~dN C~a~~n~r~sme ~ ~ ~ ~ ~fL .~C ~~s i~ si~ gg ae~'~~ r'ti~ ! s~'9o azs ozr ~ ~i p sr ~z5 a~ i ic 56a i~iil.di a._nr~ ;;,Nd~~ ~ 9"soo ~oiso~i i - I I i I rot i n Fi;s9~~ ~ gt ~ S~YZS-os ~ ~,~ra~~ ~.a~~ uo q31 acm mts= roi-ai s33H5 M a~~~~ 3~81~1 13~~`dd ~ Izz ~ Itz
~r~s~i`~ i~---.. p 2G~S5a•~ a~roaEb'rc ---'zt f ~yi~uu~._iSr~+NR~ IP°d~oz r - i d 1 I ~5Z p irr ~ u u~4859, i r9 6CG'6 ~fi ~ 5Ni Aiu Aiis~~+awn u gzSa ~atsn ea-o-~ ~ • e _ ~ C9k-l IE I 9~4l~ i 9LT91 f i~sas9x `~ll ~'}xj0~il ~ZSfl ~9L5s I£0-0~ Og6'1 I ~I ~Y9L~§~ ~ ~ OO~f~~'~~` I 15f1a1 N30YjHSIJ 3H1J Q.fF,C~IS1 li~ $ ~ Isz
~ z9<< i~ i k t~i~ ~ ii't~i c I ErRab'ir ~ ~i~ ~}~~uoa^ ~~sb ~oi~v igg-gi ~~zo6r'~ ~ ~ iena! ~ ~ wraHS ~~aa3a jam.~as~ e<~~o t~~ v • i~ i" t''i~ - z[e'oi 1~sa4crs i en~,5~ ~_~+Da e+,4M eM i~iso ~oisv iKO-n~ Ei I~ b~,~~r.'t i --i 6a t I tlHI151~N~ H~3NOM31171 Id~a Rr~ ~ ~ r !I ~I lF S6E'l[ I f 59 Ath'6 1 p(j~4LL'~l I ~lHfq~ 3NVH0~5i Ert6 ~~~CY I t~-p
Gs5'l II Il~ Vb'60~'~1-I dM7~ ~~+~d r~1rM VM I IS~ lOZSv I4~~Ol i~ee~'s ~$~SOa I 6Z{B~'L ~ e~7al C~nfl lpZSC I~l-4 Sot il II~Y'"t I C10~~ r - cta'I oi fi ~ ravri • r~i ~C ~z ' '~fr~~ ~sx6d t3lvM qr+ I e.`~5b ~bi5+ IfQ-dt ~ ! ~f g,.~;§~ ~~i5se.s a 9tso~'66 ~I 3 rv xaaeR?3inHi i9 i~ n i5~~ ~t ~s'a~ a`~avr~ i~a~3~ ~iso~oi~nizo-ai ~ t ~~5, so dt~~5'r iE~-4
li_ u r9reg9t~ ~ r~,~~ w rw~ ~oaaaoasv ~o-a~ r►s~ i~ r~rSxas;n4 ~ se~be't~ ~~~~~~rt ~ an~ N'awuii6H~zp~fiz6~sq i<<-b {9'~~'tg ~ zsg~r~ ii ii aa €rr s5i i ae aee'~'~ ae s~a'rtz a d3 ~wn~~r,ni ~Qa~ z~~sv ~a~-v llMld3d 15N0~~I_1M1~3Yi3Stl3 II ~39NItl1~3b ~ Mfd f V3~V lv1Qi~ 31~VH ~~~,-n,~u rr iV ~ e• ~ ' c - s r z.~ s rs.ea~ ~ ~A ~+s s~ ~~?h~a73 ~ 0 w~i»un ~,~+s~Ei $ lrP~~~ TG~v
~y I y~~}~pq}y~,~Ir~y~J i r ~ I be t F~~ i~ 9sc's i 9~`~~t ! r- N i e 3 0 3~ n i F R r U ir i S c i~ a-9 V i~~~ J 1Y1 V F) V,1~ 1~J4~4J 511'~ il l i 0 7~' 4{ I S 6 L 9 1' l I 5 Z C t 6' L l i ~ n-~ J~ B~ s}4 h 4DIG`LGISY i~4'4 g95 II u 9~,l ' l I iC COL'I I L6 CZS-gl I 1p iS~'!5 ;F+OA719It15~rMMj i0l~y lrt5~ I~
9~ 9C~FL ~ ~9-9~t-L i ia 3_ri5 NOi~KUi~b'MI ~Q~O ~-Z<C ISFI-v ~ ii n r i i ~~~r~~~ '~Wnr;,~5 t 54[L S~L~s i ea S F _ iB6'[ I li 45 f9L lL~ 92'CLS~i 94 ALC'~r i r n'y3rBH3» w so~s iru-r BI'9l I d'L'~a a15~ ~'~11~~ i~,Il020i54 1`f-o k ! B I I 8675~'ll. i ~i n zrFSr9i ~ i~~•~._ 3 . P ~ ! z~^5u'~ ! osotsE~ i alina~r'rrnH~ o~~ -i5f i~o-p
I ~ il I~p 1 I I Ij6~l'96 I ~}~'dF~p~+ry pir~ LZiO%aZSs IiL-~i I t6B-i II 11 ~f~SL'Sl S92fi'1 I 05~~2~`9l I J~K 1l31}~{n~f5rya ~5py}~66rflSC I~Q-v I L7Z1"1 11 II S6!!_bf i I 51[[L'fiIC I ~~'.~.'~5 .~7iN1.L~9~102'~ZSr Itl-6I j I~,C'C il 96Cv6'Sl ~ lI9pF ~ LCF'6S'-9~ ! ~S~p~71aa113f1rcI~iSC6,~tf.G5~ IIU-Y I 06t"l N II ~8 [99'lC I h!C i i~ ipt'tt ~,ra•]7] ,I d30x~ 5 i~~26 io~5a I` l~-6 ~liklN3d 15hp~~f 11J3ry?5ti3~~ t!3(]NI7W3~ ~ MJa k v~av ~vioi I 3WVN ~ ~nnx mmr~
1 V ~Ir_ Zt ~~L'S[ I 1 ~1~r4~~ I e3[ ~eM ilvi~ I ~f~i0'~d~4a al-6 I N 1 10, ! p, SZFIt-pf I I 5t BI ~L~ f I ~~tl N~ I,f51~~R i~~zaaorsa I 6'6
I ii ii ioo-i~~r-► i Seec i a~ r°w~~i~i~~~ r~zs~fo~s~ ~ e-~ ~ ti# Z33HS M 0~I J0~ 3 18d1 ~~~~Ik~d ! ~i I~,Q~[9'g4 ~ 69i6~ i;i9~as~ i ~ ~3~v ca'=dS~:~~6CS0Z02Sr rc-e i I I~__ . II f~ ~9'~l-I fi1COl ~ 5T [Yi'hl I i~'l 'NOS{3 ~~~YaOitl 5~E4~Z0't5y I J-ti I
! _ i~5s~s~^i ~~28 ~ a~tw[s i Ab~rf n+ ~2SDZaz~r is-~ I ~9~ J~ ~I O~,iSp~j~ ~ ~p~ E~p~g~ I ~a~.~v N~Stv780b ~ ifGlU~S~ I v°b I ` ~ 6C ~SSt i Oi B>fiL i 6t 66AL I h1NnOJ 3NYN4~S ifRrfl tri ~ 3~ ~ II ~i p~~59~~f I 06.~~°,~dS~~ Hdls~ +~OS 1N $8 Zp2~l ~'-6 I ` ii b~ t~~ ~ ~ B& p59 Z ~ l.t SEB L ~ x~Nf~Q~ jNNM(3[5 ~~Or{l i~t~~ 19~-~ ~ ~
~C9rl 11 . kl~iigp~t'~ B~1,LiB 9t'liS'S5l I '`~'1`f l~ 3 d~ tF£4tOZSY I L'~ ~ ~I i`i C~C LFC'S ~~t'C04'L - f['O~~~E I AtHn07 3NbH0E Fe61eZ~C iSf-~' ' LYb fL li il 16 691~9~L I UI 9Q'6S h 16'FS,r,T'►IZ I lvl~ dilOJ~~Nfyd I~L~I$%pZS~ I I- II tl 9(Z1'S I IS A~f~ LZ 984~L I ~tb~63 ~HY51CI25 i~r4 Il2SC 14L-C ~ldr~d3d 15N03JI 1H3t535V3 IV d39~N3H ~ Mf~ I V3bq 1Vt01 ~ 3vraH r'~~„~n~a n ~i r9vses i awc~+~r ~~a~~"ear ~ ~n?js W~ii~iH B~rqtvi4C I~i-f
I j - Ei n et as['S i ~d 60~'~ ~ rc ~~s a ~ AlldllD~ ~NMNOdS p eo~a ~r- c ~rc-~ fi~ 1~3H f~ ~ r~ ~~96ZIt' ~ SI (tF'~ ~ tRro4~i1 x1aA07~Nt'AOdS l80v~jlv~l{-{ ~ I H II i~ssi.~ ~L9l~~L ~Z►ILL~L 1 71 N~6H N`~j11RNN X 4~Ji4leZSi !flC-f
~ L Il r ` S 5rT ~ fQ4`SS'L ~ aarui ~ HHr~r ~;na~rn~~ ~tio:o ~r~st i4C-{ f ii i~► ia s 5i ~~s i5'dti~'e ~ ~iranoa ~raeb~~ i LdsO ~ri~C ~ea-r
nla II w ~f (rd'Lg I i Iq ItZ~~B i r9i [e' d r I gar¢i!IZSv I~i-B I I~ _.~r i~r ~'~F_{ R5~6L'uY~ ~ tl5>R~. ~ A1N~Id] iHfll[Ic!S i r~C4 ~rZSC IzL-C ~rs II lil IL~_Q~'ht E i IY R4p'►~7~. I 7Yi 3 k(}55~p3i~ i CC~fl Z6t5e I R7-~ ~ I I~ gg'SfZ S l l8 IfiS'~ 1 f.9~f~ti~ C ~ AiM~6a 3briig~ p~d[p'1rZ5 - ll N M'5i6'[ k P~El~'9E i i5[9YLC I 'r'C~df~ I I~j~°B I I i~ 6~ f S9~i09~C ~ Zt94'8~ ~ 1f17MH5'RY~N~IXUM IS~C61cSSC icZ_{
I BSaf 11 $~~SI"9! 13 6 I I dtld~ I ILI-B I_. ~I I! 6~9i S 9f 14Z i LC~ICB`L ~ CSY31rv ~F SINN`~0 aNa~1~3~ fLflCO'«ZSC IbZ-C I i I i9 Ofi'igp' I f ~'i a l - I I i I a~4~rZS4' ~ 1C 66 [z ie~ 6 i u ~ ~+o~ Inrr+ i c~$r `ZazS i~ B ` f rn ngt'6 ~z CC 1.g ~ ~ n+~a~n u SiHr+3'~ awre~~3~ s_~ ~z-[ . I e"~'9~j II II ~C ~l>L i 99 9BQ 4 I q6 t6l 51 I 15f R N]Y~ 356r 1 5274 Z62~a 101-A I. I~I ~I LS 4f5 T ~!6 ~ff~'~ ~Rl S~~~L I Aie~ry,~;~ 7S~p11p~rp~~:d Fr~SC - *
i i~ u~~trac ~ 5z;~gr'e ~ r~ce~s~ + +inruf~ ~NVKdds 'i:6~$''~a~s, i- i ii ~i d~e[fl`2~ fii'~~'~ ~o9`ss~'a~ I 7~1kfS~J~ 347AR45 I~{74~ir~SC i~z-e ~ ~ ~I-_._ I~I IB I6'C I_GpbSt'9 ~ Jl~Nn67 jNY.~{}d5 ~fOZfkSY ~eo-a ~ 11 ii C9C56'9 I!S'p9C' I 6~5G~'61 I AN9l 3MU~16d i io9~~tG~t I~~L^~ ~
~ il ~ 941►YL ~ 0085 ' ~1h11G3 ~hpXpd~ ~ 106b l~lSs If - ~ +I il ;L i59'T I ~L'~Bl ~ i L~9CB 4 I H-3i"~ S`~~1f~D9 I£~9S irLSC 161-5 I ~ ~~I_._.. I~ 642~ry1► i IC[fl -L I pp'1p5 9 I +~NI1l}~ ~IJYr~dS I dOfiBl~lS4 19~-E ~ 1~ I~ Z6QSg't ~{t'~1I~ i SIZ56'4 I, ~iwrip7 3xr'~o~~5~ I 1~911tZ5i IBI-i ~i ~i osasz~~aGes~ j ODOS~'- ~1N11~3~avra~~ Iro6diEis,'stl-~ a +i n zt~nr's + 6t~sn~ + io►y+t I 1131kY~ NV9ad~ i~ i~srsi ii~-c'
~i- {i i~w i_ze~ia i s+ecs~ AIH~,~IdtiX~d~ iroooibisr iva-p a ~ li U rtt,c`5 9 I~ ~CLr~'9 I r~.rei~] 1.l. ~.ivd 1011~l7ZS~C ~91-t . ~ li I.[f&'F i Nt lB[ I rfY~~'ps I aS~~~Hp ~P 3~~+a~ ~iri iSlSro If9-~ I SSS'1 II $50~0'01 i S5U06f11 I f~ r tl"~ia~i ~~i~irCSC,-g~-g ~ ' ~5~ 4.. a 9 + i ts ~ro~g i as~~~uc s~ i§i~i ie~s, izo-~ ~ ~ o~t~_~R' ~sf I AN7dYW:1 ~ ~vl i rC~6~ lYZS{ vi-~ i
~ II I S! B~CI ~ ~ Si~h(.Y1 I~3 W k~itl;9_~.~ -h=S~fih'~7M ~ZOfl6 1.8149 l9-E I I~ I 0~ 641 L I 0L fiCl L I l FNlIOO9dl Nd35~f ~V1iaNf1Y { Sflpr ~r~ ~I-~ I Ilin~l3d 15N0]~I 1N3~Y3573 i~ a~anr~vr,~a i+~I~ I r3~v ~vlol I 3NVH ~"~„~,~.4 ! sg i' ~I s~~asc`i~ ~~a'e~~z ~~roanalraosr3ri~3M-H76~if , aa~fl~Tzsg ~z~-g i ~ _ , i acn ~i $~ue,~,.~t i si<<et,A i r aw H FuN3ai { 4oioirisi i ii-f i
~ a~ ~'~I , ~ S¢I't II !i 4CY,7~S;'Z{ I I§~`_Dr,'t'ZV N.N~7l ~i~}Pi3f11 i L8i01rZ5f IAI-S I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I 6[►Z I N 56 ~r8'tl ~ ! S~+tx~'~.i f15na1 7H!~!71 k l~~C~ -'14~Y18_i 8~l9 ii~5{ 160-5 Y
~ i~ S`S~Sba o~ ~ i ss'686'~t I~~ll7d $ 1l3y~tld ~<<~ti ~>g5t i~o-t ~ (i ~r ~i•r ~'tp ss~ e I ESB'S i Aia+iaa 3wv~ae5 i sobo i~~~v ~v=c z~ia ~i l ec zec'rP I ~ a[ ter i~ E M we~ `tniA~Hnpi I~oio irz~c ica-c ~ ~sE ~ ~~t+~rtUc~ ~ ~ ir~bro te E ± n aa~~aaN 1~0~fl ~rF5~0~ I~ I 4Sf~~~61 'I ~~88~0~ S~il 7F~M1~ 5";Ljd Fi~l p~P~l L@~S, Pdd-L I li CztBt'Zl ~Zfi~LI I ~~'~~~tl0'!H IrpZf~l4t i ISfl- 4
i~--- ~I 6i stio E~ I i e2~$a~~3~ nra ~ r e~ i a a i S'D i ibisr i 6~- i i5 i ~i ~ i i s i- zrra~ ii~i~r;~SrM ft~oe ivz~t iro ~ F II II C['6L9'd I + CL'BZ9'~ V~1-915 tiL p 9i4~6$ .3lt~dOtld 6 _ ~ i5tiaa ~r v~ii ~w-i~e h76 i 9a I ~e~SV I~ I_. fl C6 tCi'9► Gp'~t 4~~'~ti►r la~c Sluu+ uru~cl~u 4ai,~ ~rp~j~ Iv~St ISU-4 f ~1~'1 I)_... I~ BSBLZ'~ ~ 906~ff'1 I >4`lC~~~ I p d~~'s ~t3i+ala I~CQ6l6lSY ICC-{ i il iS~`~'l~$I E I~~I~~I I ~ tld _~M11_iF060 ifZ r{ I~4~C I
6Lf I! II ~61107" I~jQ~[ g ~ nsi4'S ~ Y d R[} . h)Ft;l7 1 9U€ I IGISh l Ui~t S'I I ~'!~t'!{' I I 1A~3i5~7BYYi]~fl ~3~Fi9 h7A Z6fA IY[~1 l0-C ~ sa9~~ q _~~99'S i ieir~ i~~lo'z9 s~b ~5~~ p~i ~~NiN~irS., i coti ie~5r i,sc-c U i a~~iti.
r&r~ n i3 s~~'Sr.~~ i r tz[br'~~ ~~a 1~~7 ~yi h~nM.~ifi.~~ F4[i ieisro io-f-[ 111V}~3d lSNb~f~ 1M3W35tl~ II ~3aNIVP~321 ! MIa j b3aV l'dl~l I 3rYa'H mavwvor~d ~ II I! ~1'~~0 l I gB C6►'I I I ed"7 ~YJltld ~ ~Qil !t 44 I -L SZZ II il F~'21 i If L-5`C I ~~g`'` ~ Cy4~ '~Nitld ~ L011 161SY ~I c~ i33H5 M d~i ~0~ 3l8'dl ~~~~'dd
~pGS ii ii xi't~ 6 i ec'+~5'~ i~s ii~'ai ~ e~na ~:,~+~rd i cmb cetsr ~ ~k-c o►___ ii c ~ i 9oa~r i 5~ ro~•c ~ d~4i '~ra~yd l ~"isr io~-t ~ ~TS I~l'dSL'C I 19fi-0+','~{ I d907 '7Niyd I 56id tStSV 14~°t , •
, I~ 'p ~.-i40~t ~ [SC1►7 ~ L6~95t ~i !1 A~~3a 'r3~ I cQS~ ~Yi~C - ~ ~r g 44'9gf~ i re io4'E ~ purooos ~ ~ r~~:i ~nti~~~ i~GiF ~e,~4 ik~°i ~ Rc~g'g ti k~ fF e'~r~d~GS i o~ ~e~sr it~-t p 1~5~¢ssa I r6rre a4RQS'~i ~ ~a~aroa ~ryrHO i ra~~ ~4ts - i If ll b6'~IBB i I LC1'► I4 iY 6t0~~~S I ZL'Iy[~~ ~`y9S1f. Mh,~a~105~~1 ERIll645P19~-L I~ 4~'~Y~~} ~ 9T[0~`-I -I Yi'CS9~ ~ A2~(1P?~I15711tCfSkir~SC .
i ii ii ffB'Sf~'9 ~ 9rzee i rn~i?`e ti~rno' nr~t~"~s i Fer~ ~bisv is~-i 9~5'I ii i sat9e z~ ~ 1 r~iss FE'9s~'r~ i Hirpnau u3~ar~ As»an ~c'~1 i 4~ro ~r~cc i ir u ia S~`2~a r i~` ~ ~r ~ ~i iti Fos g~ ~ c~ A~r~~ i >i a~~ it i r~ AcavS''a3Krr~91 iCr< <ric 6 ~►~47t 69 Y5"'3H! N a 13~43~ ~3§ ~ S7FG 154~p T~-1 19f C ! - ' c
I a~,~ 9! ~ filYl6 86t~ZC P l02~~"t ~~-~rIE ~ 1_~ Plel ISr ~L I li 4GLZU'91 I ~Sfiffil ~ ~7lCL~'Ll i Naf ' ll ry 16 ~ I>`L~_ - . r 65C -0 ~g1'fG~{, I~S'B9b r Ci"Cd1~@ I kl YSa"3H! ]~7bL3 ''7 CI4l ~E14Y IZ~'1 ~~il'S H ,i fL L~9'SI i 1r~'S9ti``~ ~ ►l if~9 Rl NaP N .~~~V Ir~SC I 1 YI IP 6 'fa I' - 89~ Y 13 II ~~j`!C~'~+ J ~H16L ~ ~9'944'Q~ Yht.,~Q 1V A4 Mo?SOf -kll4~±Y I g7s71 49dSC !;Q-~ 08D0l~6 I Ub~00L9 Y., '~N! tl l~a ~flel 1E1671 l~-1 ~ i l e~ -
~ ~~c ~i"' ii io itzc I~~etb I aa anaYi i e as_a3ai v 3?~ao~~ 3'a i iari ~ei r ~o~-c - ct g II iI ~C ~r t i Do ds [t sbs't9 i sioi ~ a M irl~ n~ad~ioa I fOll taZS~ ~ CSB! II l~~LtU~ I Q6b ~ 661lr'6L~ I 'S 13drh±tiW ri1p5~~N I fOcl trt~,~ F - ~ SSS II I 542YZ't~ S6Z{t`1 I 0~061g I~ Y$3~'3N! ~P 7~7tl~3~J ~s.' ~ ip4l IrISY I fri-L pgQ~E I~ I gfi'~1g'fl (~0 9Y_14~ YI X d %fIA ~7H l5i0N I 917t1 i77SC f' - I SLL I i~a5~~} ► B50CBf Y 4}AOLId'B I~S:diyl ~ J:Jd 7 7~ t~l SpTI ~615r I~l-L ~ -
! IQZ~I ~I I G~'i~ 6 B I 4 S' i L T'~ r I Y► S r 0~ 9 1 i~ Y 5= ~ 3 r 1 k ~ F ~ i.. L"~"~ J I 9 C+ t l 1 6 1 S h I£ i' 1 1 1 I f 4 C~ Z~ I. f p Q' p~ f 9 1 5 f L H d ~ 1 3 7 r i 1~~ O S+ ~ 5 9~ t i ~s t~ Q- ii~ n n cd ~96 s ~ i[c'sao'4 i ; p aa~o~ i ~'ae8 tEis. i~~-r 1 1 P I~ i 3 d i 5 M 0 7 1 1 i M~}~ 3 5' d 3 ~ ~ k i 3 0MId Y V 3 a I 1]~ ! v 3 a d 5+ d i o l ~ 3 ri 1+ d N ~,v~tl ~ ~ Z ~I_._ II 6A~C9S E I ERY1€~'S i -0 1~~7~1 ?OF01EISrISI'L 7~ 1~~1,~ ,i ry~ v~ry~ ~~~y,~~ ~7r~v~~
~ II I~ CC LL't'Y I I L'i LL t I 3 b ~~38~'~ I~ ~BO 16i5v ~ 9l-L L. Z I-1 !41 U a~~ v ~5i q. i a~etZ~ ~ ~ o4~i~~t ~ - -a a~~d3i i~Fd IEiSo- c~°i ,
II ly`{ll ~ ~ I I~ IlL 4 1 Njop~ I LIB~ S61~P I ZI-d II ! c6 fBC d ~ ~ F8'C~L'I i 3 fl W 9a~ I,~Ed ~6i5v il-L I il ~~'1(~pl I ~I IICfi6'1 I 3{I N~vq~j I Si6~ ~6iSp I~I~L' I' Ih(11iYltlF1~'S~P'Jl !J 12~~, l715 ~1'M 5~06t42SC I C-1
YL► I [I_4'Z_fgf~lt I ~ SC`~6L`IZ I r~~d^J 1~ M~ MNV I 918~ sE15P I~eO-d l ~ II SO lSL1i ~ LT i rS YC6'LI i P CnOMF~ Y 1 N Hd !S 5110~ ~OtrUt4°L4e~ 5D-l LLC I fl 7~ I I ~CiCS'►I I ~tl y 7i_3 Nid~riN7~ ~¢!~lEISt IBO~d~i~ ~ I!~C9't~$~ll ! 1L9~Z i B694t"+l I I' YdUNfS k hic' 1 !d T cs~ -l I 6~l'{ i N~f I I ZL [Ri! 6f I. ea~Il~H~hd 9 4pL~ 1515R I LD-1 i I II Hf ~v8 ~d I 1 Bf Lf8'9 I~' N~i~4hY~s ~'~~tid~l~ ~!14~ ~ 5~*aZ4Z4i I PO'I
SL6't ~I u Il[66°B~ I 6SCi I p1 ~[0'Ei l edU~! h3~iad1 ~b10~'6~ t I~-d ~ ~i [9'L99'91 ~f 19$999~._~ T t'SaRYS ~i 1 N He 1 ii t~ r~irb„ri~l~4-~ ~ l~ II CC ~'CB~ I~p-9Z2~i {CBfip-IC +t'RA ~ SVl~n7iH 4~JSC15v91 ~(11~ IE15t iSfJ-L il If i.9 s4t'fl ~ i L4l9t CI I IA ~~~~jS{d jfll~ I C~IFOLS~SC IL 'I 6tc G~ u rC ~~i~[ ~ i r~ ►~"c I ~~~si e_eti i rbio i~i r i r~-c ~i C►'S~a G r aa zrx ti 5u 6 ~ ~n iaiaL + ai~ i roofi trds~ i io-i ,I
azr~r u ~I ooa~~ i oo aoR'4~ 9 r~3c:H~ ~?'~r:,~~ i e~o6 i~~~r ico-~ 1~Yid3d 15Nba~l 1N3YY~5b'3 IE ~l3QNIt+l13a I ►+1j~l~3~'4 lVdO,E 1 31YtlN ! ~eNw usnra tl I~ il 1~9 I IL~gE~S~I~I ~ I~ ~ fl kd5a~1~' ?JdP I i 1 r I~~-L ~ ~ hl ~I b911I~,[ I ~5EL11'SI I ddJ]~Nhdl fGYfF161SP 10'L M~~ 3,$~~
~ tIW~3d 15N~?~f 1h3Yi~5~'~ II_b3UMN~4321 ~ i41{}~ ~H3lfP lp,Lfl1 ~ 31YI+N . u~alJ"'~mme
L# 13~HS M~~~0~ 37'~`dl l 'dd ~~3~ 3~'df~~5 NI S`d~~~ l~~ ~~Dn~
,
! ~ ~
. •Kimball Sand
, Y
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 1998 9:08 AM
To: Webster, Louis
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Pederson, John; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Franz, Dean; Miller, Katherine
Subject: ZE-18A-89 - Change of Conditions
3-11-98
I received the above referenced application on March 10, 1998.
This project lies in an area of approved soils so a concept drainage plan is not required.
I have no knowledge of any critical areas on this site.
t object to applying 208 to "newly developed areas" only. The project should comply with the existing regulations
which require the retrofitting of redevelopment if certain conditions are met.
Ow q&UW&94
Page 1
--a
• • - -
0. 0 , 0 0
• 0 O a 0 O b 0 d 0
A e o •e e
e
y 8uiiding and,Planning
7'0: Spokane Count
P1~ner: JOHN 'PEDERSON' , .
Froet~: Scott Engelhard, Transportation Engineering SP 8 DES.,Coordinato, . r ~
~
Subjects. ZE-001 8A-89 (~-3 CHG OF. C0619D)
AppBicant: GARY BERNARDO
Date: June 12, 1997
RfE: Short PlatReview
After review of, 2E-0018A-89 B-3 CHG OF COND Spokane County Transportabon Engineering
Section is:requesting additional traffic information prior, to.ttiis, item being ,placed on an agenda for
a putilic bearing.
Please suspend the Technical Completeness Review -for this, proj„ect until such time-as, additional
information 'is submitted and reviewed.
The requested, information is a Traffic-Analysis scoped by Spokane County Engineers.
. Thank you for your consideration in this matter
• • •
M E M 0 R A N D U ~
DA'i'E: Juae l 1, 1997
TO: John Pederson, Division of-Building and Planning
FROiVI: Brenda Sims-and Katherine MiUer, Water Resouces
RE: ZE718A-89 Change of Conditions
CC: FIL- E
Improvements such as remodeling and additional buildings triggers the entire site to be brought
up to "208" standards when the proposed work exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the
property. It appears that the proposed work will exceed '50%, therefore the entire site wiil need
to be brought up to °208" standards. This. means that existing drywells need to have swales
placed around them or be abandoned: The original language under the CONDITIONS OR
CONTINGINCIES APPLIED.TO THIS APPROVAL (page 2,; #8) will need to reflect. that the
existing areas- will be brought up to "208" standards. Under the County Planning, Department
condition #6 the original language need to remain regarding the compliance of "208"
recommendations....necessary landscaping -for runWfor the entire site.
The proposed -area covers approximately 50 acres within the Aquifer Sensitive Area. This.a
relatively large area'in an environment. known to produce lowr quality n,inoff due to the often
heavy traffic in, parking lots and the subsequent build up of pollutants between storm events.
Every opportunity needs to be taken to reduce the amount, of,runoff directly injected to the
Aquifer from sites like this. A site this, size with -a 90% impervious, area coverage .would require
about four acres of infiltration area for treating stormwater. At this cov.erage there is more that
enough open space to treat all of the runoff from the site. Using some innovative design an
even higher coverage could be obtained while still infiltrating all,,of the "runoff per'the County
design crifteria.
The area used for stormwater infiltration cain usually be incorporated into the overall
landscaping design and actually be a plus 'for the- site. Use of some innovative technology can
reduce the-total impervious area of the site and actually result in some parking area actually
serving double duty - both parking and infltration can be accommodated on the same land
area. There: are a number of new,,synthetic materials that can be installed in grassed areas
that will allow the grass to support the load of vehicles while retaining the permeability of the
soil and 1he treatment capacity of the vegetated cover. Dedicating some of the parking around
the periphery of the lot to.grassed parking can achieve the benefits of 'lower total impenrious
area, less. infiltration area required and the double use of the land for both parking and
infiltration. One acre of,grassed parking area .will provide nearly 200 parking spaces and will
infiltrate the runoff from some six acres of impervious area.
These areas also provide ideal locations for storing plowed snow in -winter. Because-the melt
water can infiltrate below the pile, there is little or no water running across the'paved parking
area that can freeze over night to create slick areas tliat are a hazard for cars and pedestrians
alike.
c:%Hnrvoows%roinP+w, eaes.aoc
- - - ~ - - - - - - - _ - - - -
. y .
. .
M EM ORAN D U M
DATEc June. 1 l, 1997
TO: John Pederson, Division of Buildiag and Planning
FROM:, B'renda Sims and Kathecine MiUer, Water Resouces
RE: ZE-18A-89 Ctiange.of Conditions
CC: F1LE
Improvements such -as remodeling and additional buildings triggers_ the entire site to be brought
up to u2081' standards when the proposed work exceeds 500% of the assessed value: of the
property. It appears that the proposed work will exceed 50%, therefore the entire-site will. need
to be brought up to "208"1 -standards. This _means that existing drywells need to have swales
placed around them or be abandoned., The original language under the CONDITIONS OR
CONTINGINCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (page 2, #8) will need to reflect,that the
existing areas will be brought up to "208" standands. Under the County Planning Department
condition #6 the original language. need fo remain regarding the compliance of "208° l
recommendations.... necessary landscaping for runoff-for the-entdre site.
The proposed area covers approximately.:50 acres within .the Aquifer Sensitive Area. This a
relatively large area in an environment known to produce low quality runoff due,to the often
heavy traffic in parking 1ots and the subsequent. build up of pollutants between storm events..
Every opportunity needs to be taken to reduce the amount of runoff directly injected to~ the
Aquifer from sites like this. A site this size with a 90% impervious area coverage would require
about ,f,our acres of infiltration area for -treating stormwater. At this coverage there is more that
enough open space to treat all of the runoff from the site. Using some innovative design an
even higher coverage could be obtained while still infiltr,ating all of the_ runoff per the .County
design criteria.
The area used for stormwater irifiltration can usually be incorporated into the overall
landscaping d'esign and actually-be a plus,for the site,. Use of some innovative technology can
neduce the total.impervious area of the site and actually result in some parking area ac4ually
serving do,uble duty, = both parking and infiltration can be accommodated on the same land
-area. There-are a number of new, synthetic materials that.can be'installed in grassed areas
that. will allow the grass to support the load of vehicles while refaining the permeability of the
soil and-the.treatment, capacity of the vegetated cover. Dedicating some of the parking around
the peciphery of the lot to grassed, parking can achieve the benefits of lower total impervious
area, less infltration area required and the,doyble use of the land for both parking and
infiltration. One acre.of grassed parking area will provide nearfy-200 parking spaces and will
infiltrate'the runoff from..some six acres ofimpervious area. These areas also provide ideal locations,for storing plowed snow. in winter. Because,the melt
water can infiltrate below the pile, there is little or no water running across the paved parking
area thatcan freeze -over nigtit to create slick areas that are a hazard for cars and pedestrians
alike.
, C:1W1NDdW51TEMPlz,et8a89,doc
_ I
r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOK4NE COUNTY HEI ARING EXAMYNEI2
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HE, ARING WII,L BE HELD UN THE
LAND USE'APPLICATION -LISTED BELOW; AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No. ZE-18A-89; Change of Conditions to an exist'ing.Itegional Business.,(B-3) zoae (File No.
ZE-1.8-89) to delete andL:ot.modify certain Division_of Building & Planning and Division of Engineering-
conditions of approval.
Hearing Date and Time: April'29, 1998 1030 a.m.
Place:, Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Applicant/Owner:'University City, Inc. c% Goodale & B'arbieri Companies
Owner's Designated Coutact:. Gary Bernardo,-Bernardo-Wills Architect, 107 S. Howard, Suite #420,.Spokane,
WA. 99204, (509) 838-4511 •
Address nnd Locqtion: The property is commonly, known as University City Matl. The property is located south
of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue and west of University Road.in Section 20, Township 25, ~Range 44 E.W.M.,
Spokaiie County,, Washington.
Comprehensive.Plan: Urban and Major. Commercial:
Zoning DcsignAtion: Regional;Business (11=3).
Environmental Determination: A Determination ofNonsignificance was issued by the County, Div.ision of
Building and Planning, as,the lead agency. The official, comrrient period ended March 24, 1998.
RelAted Permits: None
Division of-Building &.Planning Staff: Louis Webster, AIC,P, (50) 456-3675.
HEARING. EXAMINER PROCEDUItES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing wil] be conducted under the rules=of procedure adopted in Spokane
County Resolution No. 96=0294: All interested persons may testify at'the public hearing, and may submit written
comments and documents before or at the-hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time, given to speakers:
A,speaker representing, each, side of'the issue is -encouraged. An.y appeal 'of the Hearing Examiner's decision will
be based.,on the record establislied,before'the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to- County Resolution Nos. 96-0171.
Environmental appeals will follow the,same procedur'al route as the underlying action~. All hearing will be
conducted in facilities,%vhich are physically accessible'to petsons with disabiliti*es.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff*Report will generally be available-for inspection-seven days
before the hearing. The Staff'Report and,-application fle- may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of
Buildirig. Rnd Plailning, 1 St rloor Permii Center West, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane,
WA, 99260, benveen'S a.rii. and 4 p:m., weekdays, M-r, except holidays. - Copies of-documents will be made
available for-the cost of reproduction. If you li'ave any questions;or-special needs;.please call the Division at (509)
456-3675. Send %vritten comments to'the Spokane County'Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W.
Broad'way, Spokane, WA,.99260; Attn: L-ouis Webster, AICP, ZE-18A-89. Motions must be, made in writing and
submitted to the S.pokane County Hearing Examiner, 3rd rloor, Public Works'Building; 1026W. -Broadway,
Spokane, WA, 99260-0245.
PAGE 1 • 08:46:39 27 MAY 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Lag Info..........
05815 2ND AV (START) 00.000 HAVANA ST U 19 PAVED 18
2ND AV 00.120 DEARBORN RD U 19 PAVED 18
00.240 CUSTER RD U 19 PAVED 18
00.370 CHRONICLE RD U 19 PAVED 18
2ND AV ( END ) 00.510 CARNAHAItT RD
05816 2ND AV ( START ) 00.000 DOLLAR R.D ( START ) U 19 LIGHT B ITUM . 20
2ND AV 00.060 DAVID ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.120 THIERMAN ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.180 ELIZABETH RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.250 BR.ADLEY RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.310 DORA ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.370 COLEMAN RD II 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.500 GIRARD RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2ND AV ( END ) 00.620 PARK RD U 19 LIGHT B IZ'UM . 20
05$17 2ND AV (START) 00.000 PROGRESS RD U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV 00.060 ST CHARLES RD (END) U 19 PAVED 36
00.120 SOMMER RD (END) U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV (END ) 00.180 NEWER RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40
06061 2ND AV (START) 00.000 SARGENT RD U 19 GRAVEL 20
2ND AV 00.080 DALE RD (START) U 19 GR.AVEL 20
2ND AV (END) 00.190 DISHMAN RD U 19 GRAVEL 20
06192 2ND AV (START) 00.000 BEST RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV 00.210 ADAMS R.D U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV ( END ) 00.280 EAST END OF ROP,D U 19 PAVED 40
05818 2ND AV (START) 00.000 MANIFOLD RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 26
2ND AV (END) 00.080 LONG RD U 19 GRAVEL 26
06017 2ND AV (START) 00.000 NEWER RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV (END) 00.060 SULLIVAN RD U 19 PAVED 40
05821 2ND AV (FOUR LAKES) 00.000 SPOKANE ST (FOUR LAK R 09 GRAVEL 14
00.060 CHENEY ST (FOUR LAKE R 09 GRAVEL 14
06057 2ND AV (FOUR LAKES) 00.000 CHENEY ST (FOUR LAKE R 09 GRAVEL 10
00.070 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 GRAVEL 10
05820 2ND AV {FOUR LAKES)( 00.000 ELECTRIC AVE R 09 GR.AVEL 14
2ND AV (FOUR LAKES)( 00.070 ELENORE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 14
05819 2ND AV {LIBERTY LAKE 00.000 SPRAGtJE AVE R 09 PAVED 36
2ND AVE 00.120 2ND CT R 09 PAVED 36
00.190 WRIGHT CT R 09 PAVED 36
2ND AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00.250 MITCHELL CT (LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 36
00.310 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 16
00.450 DELLA ST (LIBERTY LA R 09 LIGHT BI'I'[7M. 16
00.540 CLUBHOUSE RD (LIBERT
2ND AV (I,IBERTY LAKE 00.560 EAST END OF ROAD
06046 2ND AV (MEAD) (START 00.000 FREYA ST (MEAD) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2ND AV (MEAD) 00 . 070 MAIN ST (MEAD) R 09 LIGHT BITLJM. 20
2ND AV (MEAD) (END) 00.110 MARKET ST & PEONE RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
06200 2ND AVE (START) 40.000 WEST END TO BURNS RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AVE 00.050 BURNS RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AVE (END) 00.100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
06058 2ND AVE (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AVE (END) 00.040 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 36
06180 2ND AVE (START) 00.000 MOEN ST U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AVE (END) 00.040 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
06219 2ND AVE (START) 00.000 BA►RKER RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AVE (END) 00.130 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
06924 2ND CT 00.000 2ND AVE R 09 PAVED 36
00.030 NORTH END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
PAGE 2, • - a8 : 4 6: 4 3 2 7 NiAY 1'9 9 7
Road# Road Names............ MPost . Reference Descr- ip'tio Road Log Info . . . . . . . . . .
0,5,913 2ND CT (,START). 0 0. 0 0,0 -SHERIDAN ST U 19 PAVED 3-0
2ND GT ( END ) 0 0. H"0 EAST END:OF, ROAD U 19 PAVED 3-0
0 6 2 6 9 2ND CT ('START,) 00.000 W,ILSON ,ST (MEAD ) U 19 PAVED 3,6
2ND CT ( END ) 0 0. 0 4'0- EAST END OF ROAD II 19 PAVED 36,
0 6 2 7 0 2ND' CT (MEAIY) (START 0 0. 0.00 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 3 6
2ND CT (MEP,D) ('END) D 0. 0.4.0 SHERIDAN' ST :(MEAD) U19 PAVED 36
0 5 8 2 2 2ND •ST (-FREEMAN-) (-ST' .0'0 . 0'0 0! PROS-PECT' A~V (FREEMAN-R '.0 9 GR.P,V,EL 24,
05 82 3 2ND ST (PLAZA), (STAR 0 0. 0,0 0 MOORE AVE ( PL- AZA') (°S",R 09, GRAVEL- 10
2ND ST ('PLAZA)' 0 0-. 0 6 0 FORSYTHE AVE ( PI,AZA ) R 0 9. GR:AVEL 1-0
0,0, .12 0-OLD SR'-_ 19;5 R 0.9' GRAVEL 10
22 Reco-rds Processed
PAGE 1 . , ` 0 8. : 4 6-:' 1'9 2:7, MAY 1-9 9 7
Road# Road. Vames........... MPos't.. =Ref erenc_e Descriptia Road Log Info . . . . . . . . . .
0 .52 07 WALNLJTRD ( START ) '0 0. 0 0'0 16 TH AV U 19 PAVED 2,0
WALNtJT RD 00.060 15TH-AV U 19 PAVED 20
0-0 .13.0 14TH AV U 19 PAVED 20
0 0.20 0' 13TH AV U 1' 9. PAVED 20
00.290 11TH AVE U f9 PAVED 20
00.360 1 OTH AVU.19 PAVED 20
0 0: 4 3 09 TH AV U 19 PAVED 2,0
WALNtTT RD (END) G0 . 5-0 0-8TH -AV U 19' PAVED 20
01520.8 WALNUT RD (START) 0:0.0.00 'SPRAGUE AV 'U 19 LIGHT BITUK. 18
WAIaNC]T RD 0 0. . 2• 5 0'VALLEYWAY AV STP,RT ) U 19 L I GHT B!I TUM,;. 18
WALNUT RD ( END 0 0. 4 9'0'BROADWAY AV U 19 L I GHT S.I TUM' . 18
0 5 2,0 9 WAI.NUT RD. ( S,TART ) 00.000 P,UGUSTA AV ( START ) U 19 PAVED 30
WALNUT RD ( END ) 0 0.10 0 NOR:A AV
05399 WALNU'T ST '(.START) 00.000 FRANCI S AV 3TART ) R 09.. GRAVEL 3.0
WALNUT ST '0 0. 2 5 0 LYONS--AV ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 3 0
WP►LNUT ST (END) 00.520 -B I GELOW GULCH, RD R0-9 GR.AVEL 30
4 Recbrds:. Processed
iPAGE 1 . • , , - '09 : 39': 53 27 MAY 15-97
Road# Road Names,,.......... MPost. Ref e rence Descriptio 'Road Log In'fo . . . . . . . . . .
0 0 8 2 5 DARTMOUTH RD (.START') ~ 0 0. 00,0 16TH AV U 19 PAVED 12
DARTMOUTH RD 0 0. 066 1~5 TH AV LJ 19 PAVED 3 2
000130 14TH AV LT 19 PAVED 40
' DARTMOUTH RD END ) 00.200 13 TH AV U19 PAVED 40
0 0 8-2 4 DARTMOUTH RD, (,START ) 0 0... 0 0 0 2 A TH AVE ( END ) U 1-9 PAVED 40
DARTMOUTH RD (,END ) 0 0.-0 5 0 19TH AV U-19 PAVED 40
0.0 8.26 DARTMOUTH RD ( STP,RT ) '0,0 ._0;0 01, ALK I AV ('START ) U 19 PAVED 40.
DARTMOUTH RD '(•END) .00.110 BROADWAY AV U- 19 PAVED 40:
0 0 8 2'7 DARTMOUTH RD (START )0,0 . 0 00. AUGUSTA- AV U. 19. PAVED 40.
DARTMOUTH RD (END ) 0 0. 08 0 NORA AV ('END ) U 19' PAVED 40,
0 0-9 4 2 DARTMOUTH RD ( START 0 0. 0.0 0 SOLJTH EIVD OF- ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
DARTMOUTH RD (END) 00.120 SPRAGUE AVU 19 PAVED 30
5 Records. Process'ed
PAGE 1 5 •e • 09:53:37 27 MAY 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
01439 FELTS CT (START) 00.000 SOUTH E1VD OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
FELTS CT ( END ) 00.050 PONDR.A DR U 19 PAVED 30
01329 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 BALFOUR BV & RD U 19 PAVED 20
FELTS RD 00.090 19TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
00.150 18TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 38
FELTS RD ( END ) 00.260 16 TH AV II 19 PAVED 20
01330 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 9TH AV II 19 PAVED 32
FELTS RD 00.060 8TH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
FELTS RD (END) 00.310 4TH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01331 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 MAIN AV II 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
FELTS RD 00.120 VALLEYWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.250 ALKI AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.310 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.370 BROADWAY AV U 19 L I GHT B I 2''UM . 20
00.470 DEAN AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.530 JAIME LN U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.540 DESMET AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.670 SHARP AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.870 MISSION AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.970 AUGUSTA AV (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
FELTS RD (END) 01.020 NORA AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.110 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01422 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 FERRET DR U 19 PAVED 27
FELTS RD 00.110 HOLMAN RD II 19 PAVED 27
FELTS RD (END) 00.230 48TH AV II 19 PAVED 27
01332 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 GRAVEL 26
FELTS RD (END) 00.100 KNOX AV U 19 GRAVEL 26
01418 FELTS RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
FELTS RD ( END ) 00.120 S PR.AGUE AV U 19 PAVED 30
01430 FELTS ST (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 GRAVEL 30
FELTS ST (END) 00.120 FRANCIS AV U 19 GRAVEL 30
8 Records Processed
PAGE 1 V• 08:47:53 27 MP,Y 1997
Road# Road Names........... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info...........
05012 IIIVIVDRSITY RD (S,TART 00.000,DISHMAN•-MICA RD & SC U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY RD b0.030 35TH AV (START-Y U 14 PAVED 54
00.130 3 3RD AV (,START) & RA U 14 PAVED 54
0 0.220 3 2 ND AV LT *14 PAVED 54
00.280 .31ST, AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.340. 30TH AV (START)' U 14 PAVED 54
0 0. 3-9 0 R.AYMOND -CL ( END U 14- PAVED 54
-00.40,0 29TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.470 28TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
,00.530 27TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.590 2 6TH AV (.START ) U 14 PAVED 54
00.650 25TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.720 2 4 TH AV (START). U 14 PAVED 54
~ 0 0, . 78.0 2 3.RD AV ('START ) U 14 PAVED 514
0,0.840 22ND; AV U 14, PAVED 54
00.920 21ST AV (START) U' 14 PAVED 54
00.970 2 0TH AV ('START ) U 14 PAVED' 54
01."030 19TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.050 l 8TH AV ('START ) U 14 PAVED 54
.01. '220 16TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01. 2.8 0 15TH AV ( END ) II 14 PAVED 54
,O 1. 2 9.0 15TH AV (START ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.3.50 14TH AV (-END) II 14 PAVED 54
01.420, 13TH AV (=END) tl 14 PAVED 54
01.470- 12TH AV ('START ) U 14 PAVED 5'4
01.520 11TH AV END ) U 14 PAVED 5*4
O 1. 5t,0 10 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.600 10 TH AV ( START ) U.' 14 PAVED 54
01.6-60 9TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.740. S TH AV [T 14 PAVED 54
01.780 7TH AV ,(START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.8,20, 6 TH AV ( E1VD ) U 14 PAVED 5,4
0_1. 8 4 0 6 TH AV ( S TART ) U 14 .PAVED 5-4
01.9,80 4 TH AV U, 14 PAVED 54
02.060 3RD AVE (,START) 'U 14 PAVED 54
02.23 r0 S PRAGUE. AV U 14 PAVED 52
0 2. 3 0,0 RIVERS IDE AV ( START) U' 14 PAVED 52
0 2. 3 6,0 MAIN AV -LJ- 14 PAVED 5 2'
02.480 VAI,LEYWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.630 SPRINGFIELD ,A`I (STAR U 14 PAVED 20:
02.:6:50 SPRINGFIELD AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
02.73-0 BROADTiJP,Y AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.980 BOONE AV (`START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.020 SHARP AU (END-) U 14 PA`IED 2'0
03.070 SINTO AV (END) U 14 PAVED 2-0
03.130 MAXWELL AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.140 MAXWELL AV (END ) U 14 PAUED 26
03.240 M I-S S I ON' AV U 14 'PAVED 20
03.310 AUGUSTA AV CT STA U. 19 GRAVEL 2,2-
0 3. 170 NORA AV ( START ) U 19 PAVED~ 32.
_
UN I VERS I TY RD,(END ) 0 3. 3 9~0 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
05013 UNI VERS•ITY RD (START 00.000 SOUTH END TO MO1V'I'GOM U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD 00.170 MONTGOMERY U 16 PAVED. 20
00.1'70 MONTGOMERY -DR U 16 PAVED 2'0
0 0. 3,0 0 BUCKEYE AV (END ) U 16. PAVED 20
00.370 GRP,CE AV''( START ) U 16 PAVED 20
PAGE 2 6 9• • 08:47:08 27 MAY 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
06.180 BASJNEN RD ( START ) U 14 PAVED 86
06.300 BEST RD (END) U 14 PAVED 86
06.510 ADAMS RD U 14 PAVED 86
06.760 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 86
07.030 SULLIVAN RD U 14 PAVED 86
07.510 CONKLIIV RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
07.640 CARNINE RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
07.910 STEEN RD (END) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.030 FLORA RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.220 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.270 TSCHIRLEY RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.320 APPLEWAY AV (START) U 16 PAVED 20
08.340 SPR.AGUE AV U 16 PAVED 20
08.440 MANIFOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.540 LONG RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.630 ARTIES CT (START) U 16 PAVED 20
08.680 MOEN ST (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.770 GREENACRES RD U 16 PAVED 20
09.040 BARKER RD U 16 PAVED 20
09.180 HARMONY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
09.390 HOLIDAY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
09.530 HODGES RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
SPRAGUE AVE 09.980 GLENBROOK ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20
SPRAGUE AVE (END) 10.050 HENRY RD U 17 PAVED 20
04845 SPRAGUE AVE (START) 00.000 TSCHIRLEY RD U 19 PAVED 30
S PR.AGUE AV 00.090 S PRAGUE AV U 19 PA`TED 30
04621 SPR.AGUE AV ( START ) 00.000 IDAHO RD R 09 GR.P,VEL 18
SPRAGUE AV (END) 00.150 IDAHO STATE LINE R 09 GRAVEL 18
04540 SPRAGUE AVE (LIBERTY 00.000 LIBERTY LAKE R.D R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPR.AGUE AV (LIBERTY 00.050 BR 5507 I,IBERTY LAKE R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.080 MCKINZIE DR {LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.140 GARRY DR (LIBERTY LA R OS LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.310 WRIGHT BV (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.420 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.480 WARD RD (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.630 CLUBHOUSE RD (LIBERT R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.800 HILLVIEW R.D (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.990 OVERLOOK RD (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.110 GAGE ST (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04537 SPRAGUE RD (START) 00.000 WEST END AT LINCOLN R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 10
SPRAGUE RD 01.010 STROUP RD R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
02.000 COULEE HITE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
03.040 I,ADD RD ( START ) R 09 GRAVEL 18
03.660 RR TR.ACKS R 09 GR.AVEL 18
04.040 WOOD RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04.930 U.S. ARMY PERSUINT SR 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPR.AGUE RD (END) 05.040 RITCHEY RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
5 Records Processed
PAGE l _ . , 08:47:08 27 MAY 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
04538 SPR.AGUE AV (START) 00.000 HAVANA ST & SPOKANE U 14 PAVED 48
SPRAGUE AV 00.120 DEARBORN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.250 CUSTER RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.500 CARNAHAN RD (END) II 14 PAVED 60
00.710 MCKINNON ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
00.840 HOWE ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
01.000 FANCHER RD U 14 PAVED 68
01.310 DYER RD (START) U 14 PAVED 68
01.380 DOLLAR RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.430 DAVID ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.510 THIERMAN ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.560 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.620 BRADLEY RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.680 DQRA ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.750 COLEMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.890 GIRARD RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.000 PARK RD U 14 PAVED 82
SPRAGUE AVE 02.440 VISTA RD & LEWIS RD U 14 PAVED 76
SPRAGIIE AV 02.560 SIPPLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 76
02.590 BESSIE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 76
02.710 SARGENT RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.750 DALE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.860 D I SHMAN RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82
02.900 BR 4594 UNDERPASS FO U 14 PAVED 70
02.990 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 14 PAVED 70
03.060 DISHMAN-MIGA RD (END U 14 PAVED SO
03.120 WILLOW R.D U 14 PAVED 80
03.240 LOCIIST RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82
03.370 FARR RD II 14 PAVED 82
03.460 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 14 PAVED 82
03.550 WALNUT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82
03.620 HER.ALD RD ( START ) U 14 PAVED 82
03.650 DARTMOUTH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
03.760 FELTS RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
03.800 BALFOUR RD ( STAR.T ) U 14 PAVED 88
03.870 RAYMOND RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
03.990 UNIVERSITY RD II 14 PAVED 88
04.180 GILLIS RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.280 MOFFITT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.370 SKIPW4RTH RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.510 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 88
04.680 FOX RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 88
04.750 UNI ON RD ( END ) II 14 PAVED 76
04.810 PERRINE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.870 ROBIE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
05.000 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 14 PAVED 88
05.110 HOUK RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 86
05.130 HOIIR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
05.520 MCDONALD RD U 14 PAVED 86
05.580 CLINTON RD (START) U 14 PAVED 66
05.660 MCCABE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
05.760 BLAKE RD U 14 PAVED 86
05.850 MAYHEW RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
06.010 EVERGREEN RD U 14 PAVED 86
06.110 BOLIVAR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
BBernardo ° W ills
Arc_hiteets.,, P.C.
_l' l a n n i n_g
.A.,r c h,i c et.t u re
In,cer,i -o r s
November 25, 1,997
Spokane County Department of Building ;and Planning
W. -1026 Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA -99260-0240
Att: Stacy Bjordahl
Re: University City Redevelopment
Binding,Site Plan
Dear Stacy:
Thank you for taking the t'ime,to meet- earlier this week to discuss the referenced project. As
follow up to our telephone conversation on Weidnesday and. your 'inforcnal vievcr of our draft
Preliminary _Binding Site, -we have modified it accordingly b. ' g the proposed
"Rosauers" parcel and adding a. -vic'inity map. We are c'es of Prelimiaary
Binding Site date 11~-25-97 ( l l.full size copies and 1- ~`1 r. on).
Plesse advise us- if any.thing else needs- to be done to mo ~ process forward:
Sincereiy,
Gary 'M. Bernardo, AIA
Piincipai Enclosure
cc: David ~Pye,terson w/enclosure
+Cj~+~ 'r F'__ LY,.i~.. ~1
~~nrg~d.~=nc~~sure~`a~~vshr~u~~
107'South-H'oward o Suite 420 o Spokane,. WA 99201 A. (509) 838-4311 ~ Fax: (:5)U9)-838,4605
v.. y.~vv v~~~~. ~ _
' ` •
'
0447 . ArG SPORMM CJUNTY (WAS8ING'r.0M AM
UNI4gRSZTY (2,2RR., MC. FQ$ TEE 7WRQMWT 07 = RQAD
AGR:BEmNT is made and eo.tered into this- ~ day of
, 1995, by aund betweea SPOKANB COUN'TY, a po1,$tical
gdivisi-Lon of the State of w'ashiagton, lwith officss for the
transaction of'_busiaess at W. 1116 Broadway, Sp.okaae, Waehington
9 926,0 ; asid UNNERS ITY CITY, INC., a Washington corporation
authorized to do brusiness iu the state of Was ~hi.ngtan, xith of-fices-
yor the t~^szction 4f busine9s ac. W. 201 Alarth Ri.vez Drive,
Spokane, Washingtont '99201 hereinafter referred to as the
,"Developer".
R3 C I T S L S
A. Fursuant to the prcvisions of the xevised Code of
Washing ton, &CW 3 6. 3 2.12 0 (6) and RCW 3 6. 75 . 04 0', the Board of Caun-ty
Co~tieaioa~ers of Spokane -County hae the care of Caunty property and
the management of County funds .aad bueiness, including the
imnrovement of Ccunty roads. H. Pursuant to RCW 35.72:010, a couaty maX contract with
,owaers cE real_estate for the improvement of cownty roads wh3.ch the
owaezs are abligated unc3er cvunty zegulationa to inetall ae a coadition og Aevel-apauent .
C. Developer ie develorping a ehopping inall at IIniversity
Roacl and Sprague Aveaue in the Spokane Valley and -hae obzained
Spckaae Cvunty•e appraval of *zone change ZE-18-89, ZF-50A-~874, VS-
3 8- A9 to al.law euch develvpmeztt. D. As a condition of Z8-18-89, ZE-5DA-87, V8.-38-89,
Developer is required to impz-ove University Road by installing
traffic eignals, curb, s~idewalk-, paving and dxa.inage centrol i~a the
vicinity of. the develvpment (~Yiereiaafter referred te as the
AUnivereity City 'Erojec.t . Construction of .the Univereity City
Proj ect wil-1 enhance acces9 to Developer' s property.
R. Spokane County intends- in the near future to make- certain
_roadway inaprovements -to Un,i,creraity Road between Thizd and Riverside
Avenuea thereinaf ter re£erred ',to a9 the "University Road Proj ect"
' IF. 9pokaae County is willing to design and iaclude th.e
Uzzivezai•ty C'ity 'Proj ect ae parz of the contract lzz bg0 bid ta
privaCe contractors for 'inetalling the University Road PZoject,
subject to reinibursemeat. by Developer for t}ie cos'ts eg thhe
Univeraity City Pro j ect.
PAGE - 1
V%P/ 44/ k!J 1L: 40 au2! 444J410 • ' ,
• ~ • •
G. The currently estimated cost ot the LTiiiversity City
ProJect is $210,150 for constructioa, plus aa additional 10W to
caver the County's co6ts for con9t-ruction eugiaeering, inepectiQn
and re-lated services.
H. The parties contemplate zhat it Tsi.ll be pos9ibl.e_ to
better estunate che cost of coasuucting the IIniversity City
Project EroYn the quantities an+d unit prices listed in the lowest
responsible bid eubmitted fcr the cambiaed Proj ecta .
I. The vartieB furzher contempla r.P that it wil.l. be possible
.ta deteraaine the ult~imate cost of constructing the IIniversity City
Pro j ect agter the Proj ects .have been c.ompleted.
Ba$ed oa the above recitale, TKE COUNTY AND UNnBRSITY CITY,
YNC. 8F°REBY AGREE A9 FOLLOWS: T E R M 3
SFCTION l: Ohljgs,~Ltions of Snokanc County.
spokane Couaty ehall perform the follvwing responsibiliCies.:
a. ?r°mare nlan9. svecif-ications and an estirnate of- ccst
for the combiaed IIniver9ity R.oad/Ua.iversity City proj,ect,,
allaw Developer a reasonable onportuziity for review axld
coment on -the vlans for the tTniversiLy City Project, 'and call
Por bids f'or =a combined University City Pro j ect azid University
&oad Pr.oj,pct. ~~~ar i~`~~ 3 wit~h th~s :.ntractcr submittinc
the lawest responsible bid f!or the combined IIriivereity
RoadJUnive"rsity City Prej ects, as detarmined by 3rokane,
County.
c. Pay the coatzactor che aatauats due under tihe combined
contract, as the wor3c i's accompliehed and accepted- by Spokane
County.
d. Upon completion of the IIniversity ~Road/Univ+ersity
_ Cizy Proj ects pay the Developer- the difference betweea the
Uiiiveraity Road-/Universiry City P=vj ects -and the appraised
value ($29 0, 5 0 0) og parcels 7. aund a per the attaehed right - of -
vay plan.
e_. IIpcn compl'etioa of the Univaxsity City Proj ect,
accept the univers,ity City Project irnprevements as part of the
County road syezem and assume maintenaace reeponsibiiity
thereof.
PAGE - 2
'
03/24/93 12: a9 'OS09 3243'478 COWTY ENGINEERS 19.004
~
. •i f. Realign the S'outh valle f_Arteria3. at the wes~t ead of
the Univers:ity .property, as. -mrore pax~ticularly described on
8xhibit "A" attnched hercto, and trade that r-3.ght-oE-way for
zeplacemeat land; and Zralue thereof,to be determiaed az a
Zater date.
g. Allow Developer to use the north tbi.rtX (30) feet- of
the south Valley Arterial righz-of -way -tor storm 'drainaga
and/or lazidscaping-.
SEG''_'-ION a: Obl=iaations of Devel-orR=.
Develcper sh,a1:1 perfornt the foli owing responsibilit-ies:
a. Blace Bt:atutoacy warra.nt deed for .pascels 1 aad 2
into escrow (agent to be deti~rminad) until closing.
b. Provide the County and ita coatsactor accees -to
DeveIoper's prcperty as requized to cons,truct the Proj.ectt,
c. After payment by Spokane Caunty as determige8 under
pasagraph id above cloeing will occur, and the e9crow agent
will provice Spo;~ane Lcoanty ~a j-:z_-3 ::I rsmd g4r
,3y3 = 3nd fuads to the neveloper at a
future date.
d_ sell 'to the ,County the ,land rerruired to modify the
alignment of the ea.st end of t::e 9outh Valley Arteriai.'
.
SECTION 3 : M9difiaati0n3
No .modi!:c3ticn or amenc~nent to thi9 acrreencnt shall be ~valid
uatil the aaate is reduced co. w-ri-ting and executed ws.th -the 9aawe
.fozznalities aztendaar to this aSraze.*tzeat.
SSCTION 4: Di~snte9.
Any litigacion regardiag this agreement or arising aut of the,.
performance thereof -shall be commenced and maintaiaed oxily in
cont~~etent ,courts of jur-isdictioai wit~b~.n Spoka.ne Cowal;y, wa9hington.
'*his coatacact eha1.1 be- inte-rpreted: in accordance witli the 1:awa og
the 9tate of Waehiagton. - ,
SECTION 5; jo,t-ifi.cationg. Corres,nondeacr,.r- Bi~jLjncLs .
The follawirig persons sYYaal.l respectively be adnLinisatrator8, of
this agre=eat fer 'the parties :
PArC:L - 3 ,
vu i~. ~o yuvo .i.~v~rv vvaaa.ia;..ara~a:n.{,y v v v
. . •
M
. `
• r •
a. Gary Nelscn, P.R.
Div3.sian cP =Enginees3:ng aad Roads -
Spokaae Cotlnty . Department ` of Public 'Works
Weat- 102~6 'Broadway, -Public works Building
Spckaae, 'washington, 99260
5,09-324-3457 ('relepisoae)
509 =3Z4-3478 (FAX) .
:o.. Orvill e Barises
Unlvexgi,ty City., Inc.
w. 201 vcrth River Drive
Sgakane, wash-ingLOn 99201
509- 459 -.b109 (Telephone)
SECTION 6 : 8Titi-rc Aargeimenc .
Tha 9 agreement containe all of the tezin9 and condit3ons agxeed
.upaa by the :parties.. Na other wnderstanding9, oral or otherwise-,
regarding the subj ect matter- of this Agreeanent sha.lt be deemed to,
exist or to bind the parties hareto.
IN, WzTNESS WHSREOF, che. par.tieg hereby execut e tre abave
ag-reement :
S PORANE COU►lv'' :
Bcard of County Caa=issione=s
. of SDckane County., Washiagton
-AZ°rfi : WILLIAM B . DONfAHUE
Clerk af the Soar~
.
D . E : Chilbe , Chairsna.n
Deputy Clerk
~
Azrp~o~ved as.•"t fazzn: ` -
4~4
Deputy lProse-cut-ing Attoraey
• UsIVERSITY CITX, nqC.
Z ~ '~V' - ~ ,
. cTitle,
~
PAGE - 4
1-
• ~l ' O • ~
-W' A
Bernarcla ° Wills
Archi-tects, r.c.
'I,' I,~ i~. t►, i ~a p;
f l l1 I I l'. l I 11 f C.
;I i i i~• r- i~r' •
A17ACHA'r1ENT # 1
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR A
PREVIOUSLY.APPROVED ZONE 'CHANGE
May -13, 1'997
The original conditions of approval are-.reprinted below. Proposed deletions. to the conditioas ate noted with
a sin le line drawn through the text (parkfng); proposed additions to the ~conditions are noted ~vith highlighted
telct ' . Comrnentary follows each condition offering explanation and/or justification,for'the proposed
modifications.
CONDITIONS UR C'.nNTINGENCIE&APPLIED TO THiS ApPROVAL
1. .All Conditions imposed bjr the Hearing.Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include ttie owner or owners of the properiy, lieirs, assigns, and successors-io-interest.
Comment: No changes proposed
2. That-the parking variance "uest is approved for a ratio not to'exceed 5:9 ~.~parking spaces per 1000
.v....t
sq. ft. of gross leasable area. Gross.leasable area in this instance includes those special uses such as
the -food court.
Comment: Unlikke the'original proposal, -the current plan anticipates a larger percentage- of larger
"box" tenants and fewer'small tenants. The tenants for this proposal will likely have
considerably more warehouseJstorage space than is found in enclosed mall tenants.
Accordingly,. the proposed parking ratio is reduced to 4.5 staUs per .1000 sf. as a
simplified method of computing Tequired' parking and tai:es,into corisideration the
anticipated storage areas~'of the larger tenants. Additionally, there is not a typical
mall-stylc 'foodcourt planned.
3: That tlae applicant,shall submit to the Planning Director, for review and detecmination, the necessary
documentation as specified within Section 14.802.140, Joint-Use Parkine'Reauirements, prior to
issuance of,any building-permits.
Comment: No changes proposed.
(d•1;'.';cii~i~~ ~ ~~i~v~t'~~ ~ .'~itll~••~.'I~ ° 1',piok,mv, V1f:1'►"_'01 • C_~Il'1,),,Si;ti-1 I 1 1710'l4 "O:ti-•I('+l,l:ti
. . . .
4. `That prior to the release of any building permits,'for-this site; the applicaat shall submit, to the Planning
.Director.for-review and approval,:or at his discretion at- a putilic hearing before the Hearing Examiner
Committee; a,"Master Development. Plan," whicli shall incorporate all conditions of approval and
comply with che Regional Business (B-3) zone of'the Zoning Code. Said Master Development Plan
will be- utilized to,determine phasing--of the project and required''improvements.
Comments: No changes proposed.
5. , . - .
atb;tccnt-to-A ► - - . V-- _
Comments: Delete this condition in its entirety. This condition was: appropriate for a.large
regional mall. The proposal is for a considerably reduced Project campared to the
project originalty proposed: Campliance tivith the B3 -zone development standards as
required by Condition '3 above- will be sufficient.
6. 'icmtt _ . -
Devc1opment , . .
•i RC f1 '
~ . .
~ ~ , be located at major entrances to the, shopping
center.
Comments: The requinement for a pedestrian acce.ss to the STA transit cente`r-was app "ropriate for
a rpgional mall. Transit stops along the ntiajor streets on 3 sides of the, project_will
be adequate to serve this proposal.
7: All on•site lighting-shaU comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone.and. the Airport Overlay Zone.
Comments: No changes proposed.
8. That compliance with -the landscaping standards of the Zoning Code shall be provided for EN
~n ~vith required "208"Jstorm water drainage areas to be located adjacent to County-
rights of way or as approved by the Planning Director. 'Said landscaping arid "208" areas may.tie
,combined as, pernutted by the Planning Director and the County Engineer.
Comments: The applicant proposes to provide landscaping and "208", storm water retention for
newl.y paved and developed areas. Much of the proposat includes eacisting-parking
areas and buildings: Corriptiance %vith "208" guidelines is -not pracfical for=existing
parking lots.
9~. Landscape - . . _ . .
Comments: Delete cond.ifion it its entiiety. 'Ibis candition is specific to an enclosed.regional mall
only. Landscaping of newly developed .site areas wilt 'be in, accordance,xvith B3
development standards.
.
1 0. . - Utiveility Road,,-onc-
alogig - -
Avenue. : , _
~;t~c~iad signs,shall be as. permitted by ~the Regional Business (8-3) ;aoiie
}r~; ~JL '°W.,
~ b
` _ ' - -•y~+ „i_ v' ~ jre + . 4 Xt•(• Y.\M 4[y,dyf.. y, {Sf•lJ:.4. ~~.hV. .•i. •:7.ti'!. }l.1:.. .h.A• ' A". ~~~/;~i1~i~VM~~,.i.1.'I M1YA1 •i( ~Y~~.r~~~ti~M1~~".~.'.~!
f~f A j• 4. ~~d'~,C.`.n~ f~~4.~•~. v+ _ _ .
.n•• •
Comments: The condition as originally written is far an enclosed regional wall and not
appropriate for a shopping.center with multiple parcels and Freestanding'tenants.
11. That those canditions and agreerinents entered into regarding the barricading of the-gravel parking lot
(file #ZE-50•87) shall .be binding- and continue until such time'as redevelopment_ of the site occurs.
Comments: .No-changes proposed.
COUN't'Y PLANIVING.D,EPAYtTMEN'T
1. That the.following,described property.shail be approved to the B-3 Zone and all curnent standards of
the-Zoning Code as amended shall tie complied tivith in,the development of this site.
See updated legal description included wit}i the application form.
2. -Planning Dinactor/designee shall approve a. specific exterior lighting,plan. for the approved area prior
to instaltation of such lighting: (Such plan shali attempt to confine -illumination to.the-area with full
consideration to adjacent properties)..
Comments: No changes proposed.
3: Tlie applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance, within the concept~
preseated to', the Hearing E.Yaminer Committee. Variations, when approved by - the Planning
Directorldesigiee, 'will be -perimitted, including, but not limited,to the following changes: building
location, landscape plans, and general allowable- uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform* to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COtJNTY. Thz original
intent of the development.-plans shall be maintained.
Comments: Proposed chanse is intended'to updatz this condition to current circumstances.
4. 1'he-,project- is subject-to Section 14.706, th,e Aquifer Sensitive -Area Overlay- Zone of the ZONING
CODE FOR S-POKANE COUNTY; which sets'forth various -measures for Aquifer protection;
specifically, measures dealing with wastewater.disposal, spill protection measures, and~ storm water
runoff.
Comments: No, changes proposed.
5: The present proposal is not detailed enough to detemnine whether or noCtlie use of or materials stored
on t}ie site ate in =mptiance with Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Are,a Overlay Zooe) of the
ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE CO[JNTY: Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the
sponsor/appiicant shaU be required to file with the Spokane CountyAuditor, wittun thirty'(30) days
of the signing of Findings and-Order of ihe final decision in this matter, a "Notice.to the Public" wh'ich
shall :provide -in material ~as follows:
~
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUTi;DING. PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF-
OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING' OR ANY - USE ON THE -PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER,IHE APPLICANI' SHAL-L BE.RESPONSISLE.FOR COMPLYING. WITH TNE
PROVISIONS OF'THE ZOIYIIVG,CODE FOR SPOK.ANE COUNTY SECTION; 14.706 (AQUIFER
S.,~NSTI'IVE AREA OVERLAY-ZONE). THE=PROPERTY VVHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS
NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOL- LOWS...".
Comments: No changes_proposed.
6. Appticant shall comply~ with `208' recommendations concerning storm water runoff and provide
~ ,
,necessarY landscaPing for n,noff ~ ~
Comments: Ptroposed chansc is intended to update this condition to current circumstances.
7. An, division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or 'transfer, shall compiy with RCW 58.17,
_ . - _ , Q
;Sand the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building
permits. Comments:. Praposed change is intended to update this,condition to current circumstances.
8. The Spokane County Planning Depardnent shall prepare and record virith the Spokane County Auditor
a"Tide Notice" aoting that the property in question. is., subject. to a variety of special conditions
"imposod as a re.sult of approval of a land use action. This"Title Notice" shall serve~as officiai public
notice regarding conditions of,approval affecting the property in question. The "'Title Notice" shall
be r+ecorded v%ithin fifteen (15) days of final disposition.of the approved land use-action and shall only
~be.eactinguished by- the Spokane C,ounty Planning Department. The "Title Notice" shall generally
provide as follows:
The parcel of property legaliy described as (legnl descrlption and tax parcel number-) is the subject
of a land use.-action, imposing a variety. of special development, conditions, by~ a Spokane County
Hearing Body or Administrative Official oa (date), and as maybe amended, altered, or supplemenied
by official action or a already'changed. File No. (Planning Deprrrtment Fite Number) 'is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
Comments: No changes proposed.
9. A-specific landscaRe plan, planting schedule and.provisions for mainteaance acceptable to the Spokane
County Planning Director/designee shall be~subriiitted. vu 6 - „ for the project prior pe, to release of building permit.
Comments: A performancs bond is not necessary to ensure compliance with. landscaping
cequirements.
. . '
. , COUNTY ENGINEERING- DEPAItTMENT
Prior To The _Tssuance A-BuiLdijii! Peririit Or Use'Of The-Progertv As Progosed:
1. Applicant shall,petition the Board of,County Comrnissioners for-the vacation of Dartrnouth Road frorrt
- - . , _ . yG37WC►~~~~Q_.S~a. , + ? ` L,t ya , 3
L. ~ . .f~8d~~~~,~ t: v v.+v.rr ~
0x-::Y:,a:.. I ~ ~
Comments: Proposed change is 'intended to update this condition to current circumstances. It
wouid not be necessary'to vacate Dardnouth Road for Phase I for exampte.
2. ofthe
-I . . _
2. . . . foil - - ,
3. emsthig _ . . -foi 4. . . . . . ,
S. , , ,
Comments: Delete -this conditian entirely. University, Road right-of-way has been previousl.y
acqu'ired and road improv.ements are complete.
3. Access permits for approac,hes to the County Road System shall be-obtained from the Spokane- County
Engineer.
Comments: No changes proposed.
4. - - , - - • the-_soi
Comments: Delete this condition entirely,. University Road has been imptoved to current
standards.
5. . • . , ~teludjzig
. .
Commeats: Delete i}iis condition entirely. tntersection improvements have been completed.
6. op,$prague •
"Comments: Delete this condition entirely. This condition was specific to a regional mall
development wliich was.considerably larger than the currznt proposal.
v '
7. , _ ~
Comments: Delete this condition -entirely. This condition was specific to a regional matl
development which was considerably larger than the current proposal.
8. -
, _ _
s~-4 - , . _
Comments: Delete this coadition entitely. T1iis= condition was 'specific to a regional mall
deveiopment which was considerably larger than the current proposal.
9. - -
Corriments: Detete this condition entirely.. This condition was specific. to a regional mall
development which was considerably larger than the current proposal.
10. . . • _
Coinments: Delete this .condition entirely. nis condition was specific to a regional mall
development which was considerably larger than ihe current proposal.
11. Sigineer-s-pad; , Mid - _ -
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. lhis condition was "specific to a regional -mall
devetopment which, was considerably larger than the current:propasal.
12. The,applicant shall I"submit for approval by the Spokane County 'Engineer and the Spokane County
Health District a-detailed.combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for
the entire,project,or any poriion thereof, if the development is~ to be phased.
Comments: No changes proposed.
13. A parking, ptan and traffit circulation plan shall be, submitted.and approved_ by, the Spokane County
Engineer. The design,. tocation,,and arrangement of parking scaUs shall be in accordance with standard
.traffic engineering practices. Paving. or surfacing as approved, b.y the County Engineec, will be
required for -any,portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
Commenfs: No changes_prbposed.
14. F aamsnpli~hed
wi-
Comments: Delete this condition entirely: This condition was specific• to a regional mail
.development which tivas considerably larger than the cucrent proposal.
~ . r
, . , .
15.. All requiced 'improvernents shall,conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications
for Raad and bridge Construction, and~other applicable Gounty standafds and/or adopted resolutions
per.taining. to, Road Standards and Storm water Management in eflbct at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the Coun .ty~ Engineer.
Comments: No changes proposed,
16. -
,
Walncrt'Road.
Comments: Ttiis condition is no longer applicatile to the proposed plan.
17. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements ate found in Spokanc
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-1392 as amended and are applicable to this
,proposal.
Cocnments: No changes proposed.
18. - -
Cornments: Delete conditions entirel.y: This condition was originalty intended to apply to the
required Sprague Avenue and University Road improvements. No; improvements in
public right-of-ways ather than driveways and possibly utility connections are
proposed.
COUNTY UTILITIES-DEPARTMENT
No changes,'to conditions are-proposed.
COUNTY HEALTH DtSTRICT
No changes to conditions are proposed:
COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPA-RTME1vT
No changes are proposed.
WATER PURV'EYOR
No changes to.conditions proposed.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORiTY
No changes to conditions propased.
.
;Zcl)
s
_ J ~
• - •
Bernardo • Wills.
Arc:hitects, ~r.c-.
A. r ~ h I, t c ~ iii rc
I ~i ~ L r i~r.
ATTACHMENT #:1
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR A
- - - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONE CHANGE
NEay 13, 1997
The.original conditions of approval -are nprinted :b.elow. -Proposed deletioas to the conditions~ are noted- wi`th
a sin- le line drawn-dhrough,the teact (parking}; proposed additions to'the conditions are noted with highlighted.
~W
text Commentary fotlo~vs eacli condition offering explanation and/or justification for the proposed
..v~ .
modifications:
CLVDITIONS OR-~ CONTINGENCIES APPLED TO TH1S APPROVAL
1. All Condlhions,imposed by the 'Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which termshall include the ownevor rnvners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest.
Comment: No changes proposed
Ttat the parking,variannce,request is approved for a ratio norto eacceed 3:9' ; parking,spaces pe~ .1000
sq. ft.=ofgross leasaible a"rea. Gross leasable area in this, instance'includa those special -uses such as,
the food court.
Commeat: Unliket}ie origirial proposal, the currmt plan anticipates a larger pecceritage of-latger
"box" ta=ts and fewer small tenant's. 'Ile ienarits for this proposal will _likely have
considerably more watehouselstotage space tlian is: found in enctosed mall,tenants.
Accordingly, the 'proposed parking' ratio ~ is reduced to 4.5 stalls per 100.0 sf., as a
simplified, method of comptiting,required parking and takes into consideration the
.anticipated, storage areas. of the larger, tenants. Additionally; there :is not a typical,
mall-slyle food coun planned.
3. That- the applicant shafl submit to,the.Planning Direcfor; for r~viemvand determination, the necessary
documentation as specified within Section 14.802.140, Joint-Use Parkine--Reauirements, prior- to
issuance of any buitding perrn_its.
Comment: No-changes~proposed.
'`~'►'~'1J1 ~ (,''~I'1''~1?i:~ti-•Ir~l I • I'~~: f'd•l~:~i~'i;ti-1iA,1;,
0.1;'';~it~l.li ( (~it~;;~~'~I • ?~~~ili•-{:'.11 • `'~~~,,~I:,~~~~•, Wi1
. • 1 I
4. "Ihat prior to ihe release of any building,permits,for this.site, the applicant shall submit, to the P,tanning
Director for review and approval, or at his.discretion at a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner
Committee, a"Master Development Plan," which shall_ incorporate all conditions of approval and
comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone.of the Zoning. Code. Said Master Development Plan
will be utiliied to determine phasing of the project:and requiTed improvements.
Comments:- No changes-proposed.
5. _ . - -
_ _ -
Comments: Delete ihis condition in ifs entirety. This condition was appropriate for a large
regional mall. The proposal is for a considerably reduce,d project compared to, the
project,originally..proposed. Corinpliance- with the B3 zone development standards•a"s-
requireci by Condition 3 above will tie sufficient.
6. , _ .
Development , . . . . acreiss
_ « sitaill coitiply v~iflr the Zmring &dc'
be located at thajor'-entrances to,the-shopping
center.
Comments: The requirementfor a pedestrian acce.ss to the STA transit- center was appr-opriate for
aregionat mall. Trans,it stops :along the major streets on 3 sides of.the project wiU
be adequate to serve this proposal.
7. All on-site lighhting shall comply ivith ths Regional Business (B 3) zone and -the A.irport Overlay Zone.
Coinments: No changes proposed.
8. That compliance with the landscaping standards of the Zoning Code shall be provided for WK~.
e areas to be located ad'acent-to Coun
with,:r " uired "20.8" storm water drain~ ~ ty
~
rights of way or as approved by the Planaing Director. Said landscaping and "208" areas may be
combined as permitted by the Planning,Director and the County Engineer.
Comments:' The applicarit proposes to provide landscaping-and* "208" storm water retention for
newly paved and devetoped areas. Much of the proposal "includes existing-parking
.areas and buildings. Compliance with "208" -guidelines is not practical, for esisting
parking lots.
9. . - _ t buildingr
Comments: Delete cundition 4t- its entirety. nis condition is -specific to an enclosed regional mall
only. Landscaping of newly developed site areas -will be in accordance with B3
development standards.
• ° -
. .
10. - - • . . , • ' - - .
h~ghtabovc54&Wdt `"A ~;tachod signs shall, be'as permitted by the 4,eig l Busine ss (B-3) zone
- ~ti', •Y r. ' At r.t? ~~...~..:i. 1:. ......+.~i
Comrnenis: The condition as originally, written is for an enclosed regional wall and not
appropriate for a shopping center with -multiple parcels and Freestanding tenants.
11. That those amditions and agreetnents entered into regarding the bamcad.ing of the gravel parking lot
(file.#ZE-S0,-87) shall.be binding and continue until such time as redevelopment of the site occurs.
Comments: No changes proposed.
COUNTY PLAMVING DEPARTMENT-
1. That the follawing-describe,d property.shall be approved to the B-3 Zone and all current-standards of
the Zoning Code as amended shall be comptied with in the devetopment of this site.
See,updated legal description included with the application form.
2. Planning Director%designee shaU approve a specific ezterior lighting pian for the approved.area prior
to installation of such .lighting. (Such ptan,shall'attempt to -confine illumination to. the area with full
consideration to adjaceot properties).
Comments: No changes proposed.
3. The, appticant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations, when approved by the Planning
Director%designee, Xvill be permitted, including, but not limited to the 'follow:ing changes: liuilding
location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY. Ttie original
intent of the development plans 'shall be maintained.
Comments; Proposed change is intended.to update this condition to current circumstances.
4. The project is subject to Section 14.706, the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the ZOIVING,
CODE''FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, which_,sets forth various measures for Aquifer protecfioci;
specifically, measures,dealing virith wastewater disposal, spill proteciion measures, and storm water
runoff.
Comments: No changes proposed.
5. Ttie present,propasal is, not detailed enough to determine whether or aot'the use of or materials stored
on the site are in compliance with Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of ihe
,ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE. COUNTY. Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the
sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with'the , Spokane County Auditor, withill thirty (30) 'da.ys
of the signiag of-Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public" which
shall provide in ataterial as follows:
. c
• a .
PRIOR TO. THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE O.F
OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON''THE' PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER, THE APPI.ICANT SHALL'BE RESPONSIBL- EFOR COMPLYTNG WITH TH.E
PROVISIONS OF-THE ZOMNG CODE FOR,SPOK;ANE COUNTY SECTION 14.706 (AQ,UIFER
SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY'ZONE). THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE. SUBJECT OF'THIS
NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS...".
Comments: No, changes proposed.
.6. Applicant shall comply with, `208' recominendations concerning ~storm water -runo _ff and provide
M:a~: r• M1• "
necessary landscaping for.runoff~'+~x;~;,~;,''x
Comnients: Proposed ciianse is intended to update this condition to currentcircumstances.
7. An diyision of land -for the purpose.of sale, lease' or transfer; shall comply with RCW 58..17,
004.and the,Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building
pertnits.
Corrunenis: Proposed change is intcnded to update this condition to current,circwnstances.,
8. The.Spokane,County Plarming Departrnent,shaU prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor
a"Titie Notice" rioting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special coaditions
imposed as a result of approval of a, land use action. T'his "Title Notice" shall -serve as of~'icial public
notice regarding condifions 'of ~approvat affecting the property in question. The "'I'itle Notice" shall
be recorded within fReen (1'S) days of final disposition of the appcoved land use action and shall only-
be extinguished by the- Spokane County Planning Department. 'The "Tide, Notice" shall generally'
provide as,.follows:
The parcel of property, legalty described 'as (legnl description and tax pnrcel nrember) is the subject
of- a'land use action, imposing a, variety of special .devetopment, conditions, by a Spokane County
Hearing Body or Administrative Official on (dnte) arid as maybe amended, altered or supplemented-
' by official actioo or a alieady clkwged. File.No. (Plnnning:Department F'ile N:imber) is available: for
inspection and copying in the Spokane,County Plannins bepartment.
Comments: No changes proposed.
9. A speci6c landscape plan, planang, schedule and provisions for-maintenance acceptable to ttie Spokane
County Planning Director/designee shall be submitted or the project prior
to release of building perntit.
Comments: A pecformance bond is not necessary to ensure compliance with landscaping
requiirements.
r ° o • . • 1
COUNTY: ENGINEERING DEPARTIVIENT
Prior To The issuance Of _ Buil 'n 'Pertnit OLUm Of The Pro, er y As Proposed:,
1. Applicant sball petition the Boand of County Commissioners.for the vacation of Dartmouth Road from
. • • . rwr~.• ~ i,•, r.~••,,- , C. 'Z2~ : y~~ :•{'r.tirt 01 `5~i~. !2~"'+~ v
. .~rYh~Ci~yJ~
' ~1ki .
JY X::J~~~ At~'
0011,
Comments: Proposed chanse is intended to update this condition to current ciccumstances. -It
would not be-necessary to vacate Dartmouth.Road forThase I for example.
2. -
4. ,
2. ' . . ,
4. timtsitiost-froni , . .;djthT . - ,
4. . . . . .
5. - - - - ,
Comments: Delete this condition entirely: Uaiversity" Road right-of-way has, be.en previously
acquired and road improvements are complete.
3. Access pennits for approache.s to the County Road System shaU be obtained from the Spokane County
Engineer.
Comments: No changes proposed.
4. w, front Sprague Avet
, -
Comments: Delete -this condition entirely. University Road has been improved ~to current
standards.
5. • , arclutfing,
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. Intersection improvements have been compteteii.
b, . .
Comments: Delete, this condition entirely. This condition was specific to a regional mail
development which was considerably larger tlian the -current proposal.
. ~ Slirague 7. - - _ - as
Comments: Delete this_ condition entirely. This condition was specific to a, regional mall
development which was considerabiy la'rger than the current proposal.
I. - _ - _ - _
eW Unimisity, , _
Comments: Detete. this condition entirely: This,,condition was specific to" a regional mall
development which was considerably larger thaci the current proposal.
9. •
Comments: Delete this condition enti«1y. This coadition was specific to, aregional mall
development tii►hich was considerably larger- than the current propa.sal.
10. . - •
Commerits: Delete this condition entirely. This condition was speciSc to a-regional mall
development which was considerably larger than the current proposal.
11. ' owity ; drainage, .
Comments: Delete this condition entinely. This condition was specific to a regional mall
development which-was considerably larger than the.current.proposal.
12. The appticant'shall submit for approval by the Spokane County. Engineer.and the Spokane County
Health District a.detailed combined oo-site,setivage system plan-and surface water disposal pian for
the entire project or any, portion thereo& if the,development is to be phased.
Comments: No change.s proposed.
13. A.parking plan and traffic circutation plan sitall be subrriitted.and approved by the Spokane County
Engineer. The~design, location, and anangemeant of paricing ttalfs• shaU be in accordance with -standard
traffic engineeriag practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the Couoty Engineer, will be
required foc any portion of tlie project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
Comments: '1Vo changes prop"osed.
14.
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. This condition tvas specific to a regional mall
development whicb was considerably larger than.the, current proposal.
: . ~
. 15. All required improvements -shal! conformlo the current-State of Washington,Standard Specifcations
for Road and bridge, Construction, and other applicable County siandards and/or adopted resolutions-
pertaining toRoad.Standards and Storm watertManagernent in effect at the date of,constructiori, unless-
otherwise approved by ttie County Engineer. Comments: No changes-proposed.
16.. Actms-to _
from
, .oth . .
'wahia!
Comments: This condition. is no longer appiicable to the p-r-oposed pian.
11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in, Spokatie.
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended and are- appticable to 'this
proposal.
Comments: IVo chariges propased.
18. , _ = -
Comments: Delete conditions entirely. This condition was. onginally intended` to' appiy to ihe
required 'Sprague Avenue and Univers'ity-Road improvements. No impcovements in
public right-of-ways other than driveways and possibly utility connections are
proposed:
COUNTY I.TTILITIES DEPARTMENT
No change;s to, conditions are proposed.
COUIYTY HEALTH DISTRICT
No changes to conditions are proposed.
COUNTY BUILDING -AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
No changes are proposed.
WA'I'ER PURVEYOR
-No changes io conditions:proposed:
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION COlVTROL AUTHORITY
No changes to conditions, proposed.
B
Bernardo • Wfl ls
Archi[ects, P.c.
I' Ia n - n i n~ NE ~,iOv~
r c li~-i c ~~,c,r u r c
Inreriurs DEC 9199).
DNISlOy OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
BY:
ATTACHNYENT #1
CHANGE 'OF CONDTI'IONS 'FOR -A
PREYIOUSLY APPROVED ZONE CHANGE
May 13,1997t Revised 124-97
(Note: This'Attachment #1 nrovide`s supplemental inforrnationto the Change of Conditions applica4on aiid
was.originaliy submitted with, it in May 1997. The revisions contained herein are in response to .Staff
eomments made at the-6-12-97 Technical-Review Mee'ting. Items which were revised _from the 5-17-97
submittal, are noted with an asferisk.)
The original conditiions of approval nre reprinted below. Proposed deletions to the-conditions.are noted wiih
a singte l'ine 'drawn through the 'text (parking); proposed additions to the conditions are noted with
higiilighted,text (paricing). Commentaryfollows'each.condition offering explanation andlorjustificatian for
the proposed inodifications.
CONDITIO►NS UR CUNTINGENCIES AI'PLIED TO-THIS AI'AROVAL
(Beginning on Page 3'of the HEC,decisian). ~
1. AII.,Conditions imposed liy the Hearing :Examiner Conimittee shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall-include-owner or owners- of tlie property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest.
2.* _ , _ 8
'_'1' b!---. leasabic ' _ - Cill
~ ;c~$-the-food-conrt.
Comment: Delete this condition in its entirery. The original condition establishes a variance
froin the zoning code specific to enctosed reg-ional shopping malls which is,=no
longer needed: -The applicantintends,to,provide parking in accoxdanee with the
zoning code. 3. Tbat the-applicant shall submit to'thePlanning Direcior, forreviewand determination, the necessary.
documentation as specif ed within Section 14.802.14.0, Joint-Use Parking -Requirements, prior_. to
issuance of any building perrnits.
Comments: No -changes proposed.
4. That prior to the release o, f any building permits - for this site, the applicant shall submit, to the
Planning Direcfor for reviewand approval,,or at his discretion-at a public hearing before the Hearing
Examiner Committee, a, "Master Developmenl Plan;" wh'i& shall incorporate all conditions of
,approval -and 'comply witli the Regional Business,(B-3) zone of the Zoning Code. Said Master
Development P1an wiil,be utilized to determine phasing of the project and required improvements.
Ccimments: No changes pLoposed.
ICI,~ ti01.1,111 I-IOw31-il' 0 SLritc _420 o SF,okano, WA 99201 o ('509)-83845'l'1 o rax: (509) 8384605
5. .lmr-sh -
Pr'csc~~tcd-iYYr-th . - - . : - - -
- buildings,special - - - - crit,
Comments: Delete this condition in its entirety-. 'The original condition was appropriate for a
large regional mall. `The proposal is for a considerably reduced project comparcd
to the project originally proposed. Compliance with the B3 zone,development
standards as required by Condition 3 above-will be sufficient.
6. * T'he applicant shall coordinate with the'Spokane Transit S.ystem (STA) to incorpomte into the Master
Development Plan, a pedestrian access. to the 'STA transfer 'site located to the soufh across the
Milwaukee. Road right of way. In addition the "Plan" shal] comply, with the Zoning Code's
requiremenE for bicycle racks%storage areas which shall be located at major-entrances to the sliopping
center.
Comments: No changes proposed.
All on-site jighting shalt compty with'the Regional Business (B-3) zone and-ihe-Airport Overlay
Zone.
Comments: AIo changes proposed.
8. That cosmpliance with the IandscaPing standards of the Zoni"n g - Code. shall be P ~,.~Y
rovided for newP
devel'o~e,~,d~areas3with required "208" storm water drainage a=eas to be Iocated adjacent to County
rights of way or as. approved .by the Planning Direetor. Said land'scaping and "208" -areas-may be
coinbined as percnitted by the Planning Director and the County JEngineer.
Comments: fihe.applicant proposes to provide landscaping and "208" sform water retention for
~newly paved and developed areas. Much of the proposal includes.existing parking
areas and building. Compliance with "208" guidelines'is not practical for existing
patking lots.
9. Landscap - , . .
- -
btriidnig. - w~cs-s . . ' bq. • eii
arliziljg ct~oT. , .
Comments: Delete condition in its-'entirety. The original. condition is specific to an, enclosed
regional mall only'. Landscaping of newl.y developed site areas will be -in
accordance with-B-3 developmental standards.
10. 4h
gns ,
. . -
eestatiairig-hcight-abavc---r~e at
j5d~wa11. *ttachcd, signs shall be as permitted ~b. the'Regional
Business f~~~~;-----~.~.--
Ge t~ hatf ~ ~'f~_ '~a` ~ansiknuarea;`
(B-_3) zone eX,u o%the- ose;~°ofcom p.u z;~_ f , _ _ . , ~ - : ~ ~~'1? d , O~ on ~e , ~botli~ ~
Y V~R.~
~indvS~corid~-,'venue;will~b~ehc:owit~ed~for lots}hav~ng nta
~ frog~,al,oang~~l~otlissfr~ets~
Comments: The original condifion established a variance from the zoning code specifc fo
enclosed regional shopping malls which is no longer'needed: Tlie Applicant intends
-to provide signage in accordance with the zoning code.
11. T-hat those conditions and agreements entered into regarding the=barricading~ of the gravel-parking
lot (file~ # ZE-5447) shall be binding and continue, until such time as: redevelopment of tlie ~ site.
occurs.
Comments:- No changesproposed. '
COUNTY PLANNING IDEPARTMENT (Beginning,.on Page 4 of the HEC decision)
1'.. That the following,described property'shall re apProved to the B-3 Zone_andiall current standards
of the Zoning Code asamended-sliall be complied with in the development of this- site.
See updated.legal description included with the application from.
2. Planning Director/designee shall approve a speci'fic exteriorlighting plan for the approved area prior
to installation of such Iighting. (Such,plan shall attempt"~to eonfine illumination to the area with- full
consideration to adjacent properties).
Comments: No,changes_proposed.
3. The;,applicant sha11 develop subject properly generally in accordance within 4he cevised concept
presented' to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations, when approved by the Planning
Director/designee,; witl be permitted, including; but not limited to the following changes: building
location,'iandscape plans, and-,general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations' must
conform to regulations set' forth in tlie ZONfNG CODE FOR SPOK:ANE COLINTY. The. original
intent of the :development plans shall be mairitained.
Comments: Proposed change is intended to update this condition to current circLimstances.
4. 'I`he project is_ subject to ~Sectioii _14.706, the Aquifer Sensitive 'Area Overlay, Zone of the ZONING
CODE FOR SPOICANE, COUNTY, which sets forth various measures for Aquifei protection;
specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures, and storm watei
runoff:
Comments: No changes proposed.
5. The present proposal is not detailed enougli*. to determine whether or-not the use ,of or materials.
' stored on the site are in compliance with Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Atea Overlay Zone) of
the.ZONING CODE. FOR S_P-OKANE COUNTY.. Accordingly,, as a condition of -approval., lhe
sponsor/applicarit-sliall be.required to file witll the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days
of.the signing of Findings and Order of-the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public"
which shall provide in material as follows:
P_RIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANC.Y FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER, T'HE APPLICANT-SHALL.BE'RESPONSIBLE FORCOMPLYINGWITHTHE
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE,FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY SECTION 14.706 (AQUIFER
SENSI'I'IVE AREA OVERLAYZONE). THE.PROPERTY WHICH IS THE S.UBJECT OF THIS
NOTICE IS IVIOItE PAItTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
Comments:- No, changes proposed.
6. Applicant shall.comply. with `208' recommendations coneerning,storm water-runoff:and provide
necessary.landscaping for-runoff-for=~newly de~elop'ed'area~:
.
.
. . .
COTJNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
No changes, are proposed.
WATER PURVEYOR
No changes to conditions are praposed..
SPOKANE COU~1'`~ Alit POLLIJTION CONTROL AUTHO1tITY
No changes to conditions 'are proposed.
. . ,
Comment: Proposed -change is intended to update this condition to current -circumstances..
7. Any division. of 1and for, the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall,comply with ItCW 58.17,
,
- 4pproved ;13iiiding_,Site`~Plaand the Spokane C.o,unty Platting Ordinances. prior fo issuance of
building permits.
' Comments: Proposed change 'is intended to update this condition to current circumstances.
S. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare -and record wilh -the Spokane County
Audi'tor a"Title Notice" noting that the property, in question is,subject to a variety of special
conditionslixnposed as a result of approval,of'a land use action. This "Title Notice" shall -serve as
.official-publie-notice.regarding conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The "Title
Notice" shall be recorded within.f fteen (15) days of final dispositian of the'approved land use action
and shall only be extinguished .by the Spokane County Planning Department: T7ie "Titie.Notice"
shall generally provide as- follows:
The 'parcel of propertylegally described as (legal Vescription andtax parcel-number)-is the subject
of a land use actioa, imposing a variety.of special development conditions, by aSpokane- County
Hearing,Body or Administrative Official on (date) and as.may be amended, altered,or supplemented
by..official action or as-already changed. File:No. (PlanningDepartment.File Nttmber) is available,
for inspection and copying in -the Spokane County Planning Deparhnent.
Comments: No,-changes, proposed.
9. A specific landscape plan, p]anting schedule- and provisions for rriaintenance..acceptable to,the
Spokane County 'Planning Director/designee shall be submitte,d ' - for the
project:prior. to r,elease: of.building permit. ,
Commen'ts: A performance bond is not necessary to 'ensure compli'ance with landscaping
.requirements. '
COiJNTY ENGINEEItING DEPARTMENT (Beginning on=Page 6 of the HEC decision)
Prior To The Issuance Of A,Buildine~Permit Or Use Of The Pronertv As Proposed:
1:* Applicant shall petition the Board of•County Commissionerslor.the vacation,of Dartmouth Road,
from- Sprague to the Milwaukee. Road R.O.W.
Comment: No changes -proposed.
2. lkpgii . . w . .
fahows:
l . , ufli 2. • - • fbi,t86's - r
3. -
4. -V . ,
5. - _ ,
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. University Road right-of-way has been previously
acquired and road improvements are:complete.
. . `
0 0. .
3. JAccess `ermits for a roaches,to the Coun - Road S stem shall be obtained from the Spokane
A -PP h' Y
County'Engineer.: .
.
Comments: No,changes proposed. tiie 4: - t . _ . . ; fiani etv-their
. , - •
Comments: Delete. this condifiion entirely. University Road has beeri improved to.current,
-standards.
5. *Pplitantshaflimpl- . , _ - - . ,
_ , ,
Comments: Delete.this condition entirely:. Intersection improvements 'have been completed.
6. 2kppiiicarrrt=s11211 -~comsbu _ - - c2kvcnuemt77_rriversitq-Road
arncotmnendcdinrth .
Comments: Delete- thi's condition entiTely. The original condition was specific, to a regional
mall development which was considerably larger than,the current proposal.
7. Applicant-sWl , 'tYRoa ,dont , e,; as
Comments: Delete this condirion entirely. The, original condition was specific '-to a regional
mall development which was considerably larger than the current propo'sal.
8.. . -ormb'l ` -
. . , he-upF~i~ant-shat
. - , he-trafficimpactstndq:
, Comments: Delewthis condition entirely. The.original condition was speci~fic to aregianal
mall development-which was; considerably larger -than the current proposal. 9. *pplitant-i
. . - reconinictidediw'flie
Comments: Delete chis condition -eritirely. The original_'condition was specifia to~ a regional
mall'development which'was consideralily larger than the current proposal:
10. . vr.ecoanrnendcd-iir-th _ acking`F1an:
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. The original .condition was specific. to a, regional
mall developinent which was considerably larger than the current,proposal.
11. *ppficants - 1 byth13po C" , - , d-access.
Comments: Delete -this .condition entirely. The original condition was specific to a resional
mall,development which viras considerably larger than the current proposal.
~ a • •
12. The applicant shall subm'it for. approval.by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County
Health District,a detailed combined on-site sewage system.plan and surfacewater disposal plan for
the entire project or- any portion thereof, if the development is to be phased.
Comments: No changes proposed.
13. V .A parking plan and traffic,circulation plan- shall be submitted and.approved'by the Spokane County
Engineer. Tlie design, location,,and arrangement of paiking stalls shall be in accordance with
standard traffic engineeringpractices: Paving or svrfacing-as approved b.y the County Engineer; will
be required for any.portion of ihe-project which is to be, occupied or h-aveled by vehicles.
Comments: No changes proposed.
14. - e -
Comments: Delete this condition entirely.. The original eondition was specific to a, regional
mall.development which, was considerably larger than the cunent proposal.
15. Al, l-required improvements shall conform to the curxent'State of Washington Standard Specificatioris
for Road and,Bridge'Coristruction; and other applicable.County standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and -Stonn Water Management. in effect at the date of construction;
unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
Comments: 'No.chAnges proposed.
. 16. - - - _
'Va1»tit-Road-.-
Comments: This tondicion is no longer applicable to tihe 'proposed_ plan:
17. ~Roadway standatds; typical roadway,sections and-drainage plan requirements ace found in. Spokane
Board of Count,y Commissioners'~ Resolution No., 80-1 S92 as amended and are-~applacable ,to this
prop.osal.
Comments: No changes proposed.
18. -fid. - - - - iorbc-compktcd
- - c}=in=t -
Comments: Delete conditions entiiely. Tlie ori ginal condition was origirially intended to apply
to the required 'Sprague Avenue and University Road improvements. No
improvements' in: public -right-of=ways other than driveways and possibly - utilatyc,onnections,are proposed.
COUNTY UTIL- ITTES DEPARTMENT
No changes to conditions are proposed.
COiJNTY HEALTH-DISTRICT
No changes to conditions are proposed.
' (~•~~I~~I~L(.,~ i~ ~0.0Q I-ofi p-evvi'l r.J"~• .
:'~:_i:~~ (,1~ - 1 . • . .
-4_7 5-,..~
COUNTY DIVISION-
OF
BUILDIN'G AND PLANNING
PRELIMINARY BINDING SITE PI~AN APPLICATION
C;~'~'UYIp ~ ~PA R . ` -~•r
-A. GIRNTRA1. TNrnRMATI0N,,~, `ri, ~ ~991
-IVAME OP'APPLiC•ANT/REPRESENTATtVC:. 06P-AIA9100-wIc.460,17: , ut* ~
,
i,•,.
MAILING ADDItUS: 107 S. HGtiVAf&O SNl7r- ¢Zo
CITY: SPoK~arviE STATC: V.-A ZIP: `f 9,2 0¢
PHONE: 838- 45l (work) 838- 40S .(heffie}4Fy0
Yr APPLYCANT rS NOT OWNE R, -YNCLUDL -WRI'`TEN OWNER AUT~IORIZATION
I~'OR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NA1viE: UNlV+E_~25 ~T~I CtT-/ c pHp~; 4S4 - rvloo
6~O~X~/4L'~ O B- _ t o►It pf~/ I E 5
MAILING ADDRESS: W. 20t NoAN R~I~ 0_RIVE SPo,F4q~ra_f ur,+ qR_2o 1
PROJLCTlPROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) x
ADJACENT -AREA OWNED: 02 CONTROLLED (ACres or sq. ft.)
- - 952ot. 0i09' 49201. 0 ~2/9, 452oi. 0308,
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45'201• 4520l. 041'3, 492-o4. 2305
.
ASSCSSOR PARCEL #'S Or ADJACENT ARLA OWNED'OR CONTROLI_ED ~520/- 05 Z8t ~S2o1•'064~~
¢y'to+l• Db¢.o , ¢5-2ot. 0831,, 45201: 0632, 45201. 0833
STREET ADDRESS OI= PROPOSAL
~XI_S.TING,ZONE,CLASSIFICATION(S) MUST BE AT-LEAST ONE,OR THE FOLLOWING:
❑ II- I ❑ D-2 4j'B-3 ❑ I-1 ❑ I=2 ❑ 1=3 .
EXISTING USE OF P-ROPERTY ('dri/kEXtxAt- (MSr!M!~ U-C17Y /NAt.L)
COMP_REHENSIVE' PLAN CATEGORY 11MAJt7e GOMM o2nRL", (~l C'A
SCHOOL DYSTItICT X~
FIRE DISTRTCT DISTieIGT it/a_ / WATCR PURVEYOR M0179W
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Sinsle fumily dwellings Duplexes Iviultifamily dwellings
MAnufactureci homes ( ) I3usiness ( ° ) Industrial ( ) 'Mixed Use
(
,Other-oz) - Descr'ibe:. CAy! ryfEVGIE41_ Ie6MlL
LTST'PRLVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING; TEIIS PROPCRTY L~IS- - ZONC
CHANGE FI1:E NUMB~Pjt): "Z E-1~'8 Q G; Z~ --5'0~ - B 7.• I/E - 3~'9
. I3 CAl', TNFnRMAT10N1
'
LOCAT10N,40 PROPOSAL: 5P014EU6 Avg fOE71f!M/ t4k/(y6X51ry ~ uT
SECTION 2o TOWNSHIP 2 S RANGE ~4-
NAME OF-P,UBLIC ROAD(S), PROVIDING ACCESS: SWA6GbE AVSE , UivlV4r,5-l~'y ROf
- PGtTLfl2F5 S0478 ✓'~4L1-eY f4/¢7W21A4- f ptrr}[.NU_T R,D. ,
VI/-IDTH OF. I'ROI'CRTY rRON1'1NG 'ON. PUI3LIC. 20AD:, 51R=~ 517E ."►t/
D09S THE.PROPOSAL HAVE-ACCESS TO AN AR'TEIZIAG OR PLANNCD ARTERIAL (4j YES O NO
NAME(S) OFARTCRIAL ROADS 400/46uE A✓6. NNlVAPSIT'-! /eOf}D, 50"W ~~"6Y
A-)eir-MiAL (FuTuRE)
. . • . . " • • .
I3IIVDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
LEGAL DLSCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal,description stamped 6y, Lanci Surveyor). INCLUDC
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRC AREA TO-DE SUDDIVIDCD ON, PRELIMINARY DINDING SiTE.
PLAN. .
SEFE
r
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PItOI'ERTY, WHAT'IS YOUR INTCREST IN IT? .0W~&_0t-.
WHAT MCASUItES. DO YOU PROPOSE. TD MtTIGATE .YOUR PItOPOSAL'S'IMPACT ON
SUR120UNDING LAND USE? CD/►'~P~jrfivG_~ LV'ITf4 Z0v1Ar&- CoAE 0J6!6Z40-0Mt7VT
STl4~t'R05 .~0~2 L~SG,~ p~NGrf 5~T'~KSf SG R~vtNG►C. PRi±.LIMINARY 13INDTNC;► SITE PLAN CrNT+:YtAT1 INTO.RMATYON:
NUMIIER OF LOTS: -30 GROSS AREA: -56E 5r`77E PL-'b^I .
TYPICAL. LOT SIZE: VARl E5 -'54F PROPOSED NLT DENSITY*: ~L'~'•
,9ITE X14.N
SMALLEST LOT STZE: MINIMUM-FRONTAGE:
PltOPOSED SOURCE OF WATER:-
Individual wells Puhlic system Private Community Systern
Other ( ) - Describe: P05TiN Fs ,
1?120POSED3MEANS OF SCWAGE.,DISPOSAL:
Public sewer ~ Commuriity system Sentic tAnk-and drainfield
Doulile Plumbing ( Dry Sewer ( ) Other ( )
Describe: ~~Cl 57lN&-
U:TfLITY COMPANIES AND/ QR DISTRiCTS TO PROVIDE SCRVICE TO THIS, PROPOSAL:
ElectricitY: Sewer: 5 . ~ ~E C~xlMi~1
'
Ga"s: WWP Water: -,M 015?FIQl1/ Phone:_ G!• i• OV5T
DO Y.O.U. OR THE OWNER IN THL EVENT YOU, DQ NOT OWN THIS PROPLRTY. _HAVE ANY
PLANS r-OR FUTURE ADDITTONS, EXPANSIONS OR-rUR'I'HCR ACTIVITY RCLATED TO T_IiIS
PROPOSAL? Yes O No, I5YCS, r?CI'LAIN:
D. PRTLIMTIVARY IRTNDTNG SITE I'T.,AN IMI'ItnVENiTNT .YNT+'ORMATY(aN:=
LCVEL 'OF STREET IMPROVEMEIVTS 1'ROPOSI11): PrivAte ronds
I'ublic roads Qj &v STifffr Arterial roads Tract X roads
DCSCI2IBE ANY COMIIINATION OF AIIOVE: ~(p GU161- I G ge ~~Ie,47E~ 904D5
A~E' AQUR75mp : C~E'OSS AGCE~S ~f#~~41~~~Er f~ 6~;EF..~Lt ~!l' l!!~'~ BE
~1 ~#4~,?,T caF ~ B 5P O0"u114E1qrr's.
CS,TiMATED T1MB PERIOD EXPECTLD rOR COMI'LBTE DEVLLOPMENT OP TH@ I3INDING S,ITC
F'~LAN: ARA 5E x- kww P.JE lNr'JNJw Git/a yt34k"-
FN7LI,feE "SlIV& /V07" 4,&-"7''~,A4/ Nf77
IS PETASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF•THE AINDING SITE PLAN PROP4SED? Yes Na()
ir YES, SHOW PHASING.ON THC PRP-CIMINARY I3INDING S1TC PL-AN MAP.
JS DEDICATION OF- LAND FOR PUDLIC USE CONTEMPLA'['CD (Pnrks, sctiools, etc.)? Yes No *
IF YES, DESCRIBE: /V_ 'A•
-NET DENSITY IS UNITS,OR LOTS PER ACRE-MINUS PRIVATC AND/OR- PUDCIC ROAD AREA.
. .
BINDING" SITE PLAN APPLICATION Page-3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILI.?ROVIDE'THE- PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF W1T!-i
WRI?TEN VEIt1FICATION THATTHE APPLICANT HAS HAD P[tEL-'TMINARY CONSULTATION W1TH THC
AGCNCIES fDENTIFIED. ItESULTS OFTHE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATIONSHALL IIE 1NCORPORATCD
IN-THE PROPOSAL BEFORE, FINAL SUDM]TTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSI•IALL%FiRC -AISTRTCT.-,- ~-1
N ` T NO. ~
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WI'THIN FIRE PROTECTIO _
B. ADEQLTATE ARRANGEMENTS (IRAVI) IAV~ NOT) DEEN MADE'TO MEET OUR NLEDS
1N PROVIATNG,FOR AN ADLQUATE WATEIt, . FAC1LITIES FOR 1?IRE.
I?ROTCCTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMML•NDCD CIRE FCrOW: ;:O,R•UNADI.E TO CAGCUI:.ATL NOW
DECAUSE USE;IS NOT DEPINITIVE; AND WILL nE'DETEItMINED AT BUILDING;AERMIT
APl'LICATION TIME. 1 ~
'D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
U°L116r-r-mv-
FIRE DISTRICT- SIGNATURWfI1'LE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR r A. SATISFACTORY'ARRANGEIviFNTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND T;IRE FLOW
RCQUIREMENTS (9*M9) (HAVE NOT) 13EEN MADE.
_ - .
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMIviENTS: a -r • ,
,
z ~ < < ~c~~
- ~
WATER DISTRICT- SIGNAT ft ITLE DATE
COUNTY CNGIN)EER ~-KI•~z~,~j
~A
~PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION, HAS ~TAKEN PLACE AND 'GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
-
AND DRAINAGE HAVL BEEN DISCUSSED W,ITH THE APPLICANT.
A . COMMENTS: - Z.C - I 8". -
,
. - r
:
1 SIGNAT.URE/I' E ATE
COUNTY UTILYTI-ES A PREI:IMINARY DISCUSSiONHAS.,TAKEN PL- ACE AND GENEItAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
~UBMITTAL OF THIS P..ROPOSAL (RAVE) (HAVENOT) BE SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
' WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS ~~P IJ' - L '~P_L_C _
A. COMMENTS: ccousitax-r-F- Lo.. L~ ~T~() PtkaviFyoe-
_
6NA'l
SiGURElI'I'1'~ ~ DA 'E
J
,
HEALTH DISTRICT
A P.RELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS'I'AKL',N PGACE AND GCNLRAL RLQUIREMENTS'FOR
SUDMITTAL OF TH1S P-OPOSAL (HAVi) (IIAVE NOT_) . DEE SATIS IED.
~ f ,
A. COMMLNTS: _ -
:
~
i _ ~ '
SIGNATURE/1'IT DATE,
• SEItiVE-R PUnVEYOR
1.+,~?~ ~l~•~.:~
A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACC AND GLNLRAL=REQUIRCMLNTS FOR THC
PROVISION OF PUDLIC SEWLR, ARL LJNDCItST000 DY THC APPGICANT. _
A. COMMENTS: ('Z) N L) (~tT 'Ta PagLk-k 12-
~
~ SIGNATUREff1TL DATE
' . . .
BINDING,SITE PLAN APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART- III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATlON-
J, TFIE IJN,DERSIGNED. A LICENSED L.AND SURVEYOR; HAVC COMP[:.B'I?ED THE 1~M~ORMATION
RtQL1ESTED. LEGAL DBSCRIPTION AND-PRELIMINARY BINDING~;SITE PLAN-HASBEEIV PREPARE°D
DY ME OR UNDEit MY.SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THG ItEQUIftEMENTS OF THB
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONYNG/I31NDING SiTE PLAN-ItEGLILATrONS AND THELAWS OF THE,-3TATC
OF WASHINGTON.
~ -
7
SIGNE DA''E: 1
ADDRESS: 7`p~ILO_f2 ~!~lN~rNEr , PHONE: 328- 3371
Ivh w- ML55/aV AvE ~i~K~4~lEr Wf{ zIP: ~142o I
PAItT IV
(SIGNATURE:OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR-LC'I'I'ER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDCRSIGNED,,SWEAR OR-ArFIRM UNDP-It PENALTY 4F PERJURY THAT THE AI30VE
ItESPONSES AItE MADE TRU,THFULLY AND TO THC BEST OP MY KNOWLEDGE.
t T=URTHER SWEAR 4R AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THB AREA PROPOSED
COR THE PitEVIOUSLY -IDENTIFIED LAND USE AG'TiON. OR, IF NOT THE OWNLR, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN: PE[tMISSION FROM 'I`HE- OWNER AiJTHORIZING •MY ACTIONS 'ON HIS/HER
DEHALF: '
1~~~ ~ S`~`l~►~ I + ~'3'~'
NAME: DATE:
ADDRESS: ~SI~ PHONE: 'qos- (1 (OtQ
ClXwr &d~ ZIP: V , S~
' DATE
S AE .PL• ICANT O.R REPRESENTATIVE,
STATL-OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY bF.SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AF~FIRMCD, DEFORE ME ON THIS IJ - DAY OF
~
N4TAIRY SFAL
U,
Notary Public in -end for the State of Wasl~ington
Residins ar. .L8_'0 LA.kg
My aphointment•expires:
.rAAT v
(TO DB COMPLCTED DY THE; DIVISION- OF-DUILDTNG AND PLA,NNTNG)
- . .
DATC SUDIv[1TTCD: L (q7FILE 0: _ 1.~.~ 1 l• Qt-Z&J6Alq
DATC ACCEPTED: J UvLl I Z~ 8Y: LL/ 9-7
TOTAL -FECS: RECETi'T ~1: ~I~- ~ ~0)
13~ 13.; 97 07 : .10 V5093=',° `4 TAYLOR ENGIVEER
r
That portion of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 and tbat port'ion of the Plat of Opportunity, as-per
-Ptat recorded ia Volume "K" of Plats, Fage 20,, 21, 22 and 23 in the Northeast quarter of
Section 20, 'i'.25N., R:44E., W.M., Spokane County, Washingtoa, beiag more particularl,y
described as foilows:.
Beginning an the South righi of way line of Sprague Avenue at the Northwest corner of- Lot
"B"' of Short Plat No. SP-10:19=95 recorded in Book 12 of Shart Plat, Pages 84 and 85,
Spokane -County, Washiogton; thence S.42°30'34"E., along the West liae of said Lot "B",
160.09 feet to the Southuiest corner of said Loc "8"; thence N.87°09'35-"E., along the South
line of.said Lot "B", 126.56 feet to the Southeast.cornet of said Lot "B" and the West.right' of
way line of Uaiversity Road; thence 5.0203:0'34,"E., along'said, West righe, of way l-ine, 559.62
-feet to the centerline of,proposed ,2nd Avenue; ;thence 5-.84 °45'03 "W., along the proposed
centerl ine of 2nd Avenue, 203.74 feet -to the beginning of a curve to the left the radius 'of
which _,beats 5:.05 ° 14'57"E., ,a , distance of 700.00 feet; thence along said proposed ceuterline
and cutve to tlie Ieft; through a central angle of 16° 15 '0$", an arc distance of 198.56 feet to,
a point- of tangency; thence S.68°29'55-"W., along:saidi.proposed. centerline, 393.88 feet to the.
beginning of a curve to the right the radius of which bears N,21 °30'C}5"W., a distance of.
740.00 feet; thenc.e along said proposed centec.line and curve to the right, lthrough a central,
angle of 1:8°39'41", an are distance -of 227.99 feet to a poinc ot' tangency,; thence
-S.87-009'36"W., along sa.id proposeci centerline. 646.08 feet to the beginning of a curve to 'thc
ri'ght the radius of which bears N.02°50'24"W., a distance of 1000.00,feet; thence along,,said
propased cecsterline and curve to the rigbt, through a central angle of I5°5I'28"0 an arc
distance 276.77 feet, to a,point of tangency; thence N.76°58'56"W'., along said proposed .
centerline, 339.14. teet, to the pcojected East right of way li.ne of Walnut Road; therice
N.02030'34"W., along sa.id East rlgtit of wa.y line, '596.55 feet to, the South.lin.e of the North
200.00 =feet of Tracts. 224 and 223 of said Plat of Upportunity; thence N:87°09'35"E., along
said South line, 503.80 feet to lhe West rig4t, of way Iine of Dartmouth -Road-; thence-
N.QZ°30'34"W., along said West right of way line, 200.04 feet to the South t'ight of way-Iiae
of Sprague Avenue; tliencc N.87°09'35"E., along said South right of way line, 1610.04 feet
to the Foiat of Beginning.
Area = 41.51 Acres
. -Q~L
.
,
t~
~e~a ~o -3 -•q 7
. . ,
- . .
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND P--.-JANNING
CHANGE OT CONIDITIONS TOR A
PItEVIOUS]L'Y' A.I']PROVED ZONE CHANG~ ~igl i ~ 199?
u~~o~tva
~ANp NQ
pN
-
Date: MAy 13 ~`~R ~ ApPlicAtion No. Z~ - j g4Sq
~
Narrie Of APplicant/Representative: GAkY BMvA!~ ~~WAWM-wfL-145 A90Q-7e7-T5
Mailing Address: ~~i 5. NCWAOW , -514 rrg ¢2O City: 5RbKAW~ State: WA Zip: tTR,2o
.Phone: 838- ¢S!l (Work) 958- 95, - F.-IX
Existing-Zone Classifcation: 03
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Legal Description of Property: 5EE A-MAZWE37
Section Zo Township- 25 Range `t' 9" Source of Legal: 74Y1-&9 j2d~r4AA0W1N6► 4-AS-IMEW RweCWs
Parcel No.: 4SZoI. vto~~ 4320/. aZtnA 45'zol• 0308l ¢y2o,l. o4t3j #520/. i30+1 4s2ol. 2305
rROPos~D CHANGE: or coNDMoNs
Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval. (Cite the, applicable, condition frorxi the ,
Findin'gs' and Order of the Hearing• ExaminerCommittee's public hearing).
5EW ATt'A~~ED. ,
Give detailed explanation of,request for change in stattis; of the proposal.
~ ATtAIC4l.
If development of the site will, be changed substantiail.y by. this request, or,.the property has
boundaries different than-wiginally proposed, a revised- development plan must be submitted.
~g" &zf ~
Signatuce of ApPlicant or Agent Address-if different than Applicant
Rev. 1/96; sam
•`~l~'tli'Y1~1'lc{:4 ~ ~ ~,C:(~ -1f I'L,.OC) Fey 10 -f-~- =~1=(;'r~F1f ~.~1
c~i.~ F~---C~ 7 , • • n, ~ ~U ~ U~ I~ ~.9i1'v,R'Y1 l 'l T ~`r
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF'
BUILDING AND PLANNING
PRE, LI:MINARY BgNDYN G S~TE PI,AN Al'P1~1-CA TION
1~~ - 0/n/yve, 0~ G yl-drhows
ciC~ ~
i'A R . : . ~,N, J~~;r.,•.4 - ~'`''~ti -
tt . rrNrnAt.jNr0 r~v .ATr,otL-
~
NAME OC APPLICANT/RCPRESENTATIVE:
f'►• r'
MAiL• ING ADDRESS: lDy S. q6WA-oC0 SK17r- 420
CITY: SMK~~ STATE: 'WJ4 ZIP: 19 2 0¢
PHONE: 838-~5l~ (wQrk) B3S-~~s (heffie}-FAX
.
Ir APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER,.INCLU.DC WRITTEN OWNER_ AUTI•IORIZATIO,N
COIt APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESRNTATYVE.
GCGAL OWNER'S NAME: avJVE*3 T-4 CIl5/ /A/c PHONE: 'qSl- (ol00
MAILiNG ADDRESS: w 20~ Na~ R~ OR cor►tp~yas
S PoKAME... wA qQ20,
PROJCCT/PROPOSAL STTE AREA (acres or sq. ft)
AD7ACENT AREA OWiVED OR CONTItQL_L'ED (acres or sq. ft.)
q~92of, oi09' 49ZO/. o~7~o, 4s20i. 0308,
ASS~,SSOR PARCCL IIS OF PROJECf/I~ROPOSAL- 45'2oy• 230¢, ~520/. 041 3, 4s2o/. 2 3~'
ASSESSOR PARCLL:#'S Or- ADJACENT AR@A OWNED .OR CONTROLLED 4520l- 05Z8 '~52v1. ob4/~
- - t
49za. 00*0, ¢5-2ol. 0831, 457101. 0e32r 45201._ 0833
.S-'I'ItEET ADDRESS QF PR'OPOSAL
CXISTING'ZONE CLASSIr-ICATION(S)- MUST IiF AT LEAST ONE 0FTHL FOL,LOWIHG:
❑ D-1 0 II-2 4j'B-3. ❑ i- I ❑1=2 ❑ I-3
EXtSTING USE OP' PROPERTY _CdN/k&W-tAt- 1;EV&7'1i%v, U•6174Y /t4f}4L- )
COMPREHENSIVE P[.AN CATCGORY 11•,mf4Jw GOMM-io2UNL
SCHOOL D,ISTRICT-
F'IRE DISTRICT OIS?R,tGT it/v_ / WpTER PURVCYOR Mo100W
PROPOSED US5, OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellinss ) Duplexes (MulfifAmily dwellinss
MAnufucturect horries ( ) Business ( ) Industrial Mixed Use ( )
Ot.fi.er-#~j - Descr'ibe: CA►j1 mE1PGI.4L K6,RiIL
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING. DCPARTMENT ACf10NS INVOi.ViNG THIS t'ROPCRTY LIS ZONC
CI-lA[VGE I~ILE NUMD~Jt): Z E - ! g - 0.1 G ZE -5bf} - B 7 : ✓E -3 0 ' ~9
I3 . T f;sAL 1NE0 ItMATInN-, '
LOCATION. OF PROPOSAL: 5"0RA6w5 AvE f BE7'WEW G411(✓f§e517r-~ ib W91e/uT_
SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 2 5' RANGG 44--
NAME OF PUDLIC ROAD(S) I'ROVIDING ACCESS: 549116WE ft ~ f GlA11V6*51Ty IR2D~--
Pt7Ltl2E .SGwTF/ t~J4LLiEyAt2"jM/A-L ~ WAL,W T IeD. ,
WIDTfI OF PROPERTY rRONTING ON PUBLIC,ROAD: 5eL 517E R,4►tI
DOES THE 1'ROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTCR[A[. 4R ALANNCD ARTCRIAL (J) YCS O NO
iVAME(S) OF ARTLRTAL 120ADS 15AR/460E A✓C,, 0-vfv4X)5IT-i Rps49, SGwTN., VAL~
A1Q-tse wL (Fu7L+Ae)
. • •
• I3INDING SITE:PLAN APPL--ICATTON Page 2 of 4
LECAL DESCRIT''TION OF I'ROI'ERTY (Attach lesal cfescription.stnmped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE
L:CGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO DI? SUIIDiVIDED.ON PRCLIMINARY D1NDiNG S[TF
I'LAN.
S~ A-rr~GN~
1F YO,U DO NOT HOLD T1TLE TO AR'OPCRTY•, WHAT IS: YOUR INTEREST IN 1T? aWA46P~ -
WHAT MCASURES'DO YOU- I'ROPOSE'TO MITIGATE YOVR PROt'OSAL'S,IMPACT'ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? COMPLItA116t WI774 ?-qvlrvG e-oASF 06M6LONAM6AIf
5TAN21R05 Foy4 1,04,~05t,q ^NCT! 56TA4,CK5, Sc ~e~vrNGr
C. PRrLTNi1N-ARY BtNDINr SITr PLAN GT~:NI~:RA-L ,t-NrORMATY_ON:
NUMI3ER OF LOTS: 40 GROSS AREA: -56a• 5rre PY-AN
TYPICAL.LOT SI2E: V,WR_ IES - 5Z; PROPOSED NGT DENSITY~,: _AL&.
SMALLEST.LQTSlZE:5~7E MINTMUM FRONTAGE:
~PROPOSeD SOURCE OF WATER:
Individual wells Public system ~ Private Community S.ystem
Otlier ( ) - Describe: LiV5T1i1/6,
PROPOSED MEANS OF SCwaGE D[SP03AL:
Public sawer.o Community system Septic tank and drainfielcl
Q,ouble Piumhing ( ) Dry Sewer ( ) Other ( )
nescribe: jM,I 577H 6-
:UT(LiTY COMPANIES •AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE.SERVICL TO THIS PROROSAL:
Electricity: Sewer: !~F*__
4/E CP,lACFY
GAS: . W-WP Wnter. /G10l0FRI1/ 'Phonc: - _G1-5• ~3T
D0 YOU, OR TflE OWNER IN'THE LVE NT YOU DO.-NOT.OWN THiS I'ROPCR'TY., FIAVL ANY
PLANS FOR FUTUItE AbDITIONS, EXPANSIOIVS,OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS
PROI'OSAL? Yes O No (~QWYCS•, EXPLAiN:
D. D'TtEY..IMINARY I3INDYNG SITG PLAN IMPROVTMrNT INT_nRMATTON:
LCVEL OF STREET 1MPROVEIvIENTS PROPOSED: PrivAtc rouds
Public roaiis Vq &V,STIN•Er Arterial roads Ttact X roads
DPSCRIBC ANY COMDINATION OC AIIOVE:. &D QW451- ~_6 ae A'P/VIJJ5 9605
-j4RE ReoAt75tWf nfoss 11ccE6S 1hq,ek1N6- 4`9e:jMMa4r r•tlu- e8
A 04RT CAF 8 SP 00C4WME14-r5,
LSTIMATED.'TTMB-_PERIOD EXPECT@D FOR COMI'LE'TL DBVCLOPMENT Or THE 13IND1NG"SITG'
PLAN: MASE ..7c N-t`1- PJE Deilmcokv rNrnNw 64, ymk;
F07LIIeE Aq4 S/AIfs NDT' D5TWAf /NM-P
(S' PE1AS[NG OF THC FINALIZA7`ION OF THE DINDING SITC PLAN PROPOSCD? Yes ~-NA O
Ir YES, SHOW-~PFlASING ON Tf-IC PRELIMINARY=DfIVDING SITC PLAN MAP.:
IS DEDICATION, OF'LAND FOR PUDI.IC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks,-schnols, etc.)? Yes [Jo *
TF YES, DCSCRIDE:- N A.•
* NET DENSITY 19 UNTTS OR LOTS PER ACRE MIN.US PRIVATC_AND/OR"PUDLIC, ROAD AREA.
•
o r
' . • .
T3TNDING S1TE PLAN -APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PA RT tI
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING, DEPARTMENT STAFF WITE-I
tiVRITTEN VCR1F-7CAT[ON TtiAT Tt•1EAPt?LICANT HAS HAD PRELTMIIVAI2YCONSULTAT[ON WITFI 'I'EIC,
AGCNCIES IDENTIFICD. RESULTS OF ThIC P118LIMINARY CONSULTATlON SHALI.'DE 1NCO12PORATEn
IN 'fHC PROI'OSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE NLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIR E NtAI2Si-IAI.G/FIRE DISTR(CT'.,- A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION - T NO. ~
I3. ADEQUATB ARRANGEMENTS' (HAVE) •1AVG~ TOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR.NCEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN.ADEQUATE WATER _ FACILITIES FOR FIItE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMNtBNDED FIRL FLOW: ~k(;`• ; OR=UNADLETO CALCULATC NOW
DECAUSE USE 1S NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL DE DLTEItMINrED AT BUIGDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIM L. w,~,`~,~ ev f~
,
D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:-
Unlk,~,~
CII2C DISTRICT SiGNATU(RCrTI'I'LC DATE
WATE R PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY AItRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND nRC FLOW
REQUIREMENTS- (RAAW) (HAVC NOT) 13CEN-MADC.
.
B. RCQUIREMENTSlCOMMCNTS: . •-»~t~-~ - .
j • Lc)a& y-
w
~
ATER DISTRICT SiGNAT iTLB 'DATE
COUNTY CNGINECR
A PRELiMINARY DISCUSSION HAS:TAKEN.PLACE AND GENERAL itEQUTREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE DEEN DI3CU3SED WITWTHE A~'I'LICAN''.
. '
A. COMMENT& , Q•+.~ Z.E • I~3 agC
. , .
. , <
~ ' VA -7 SIGNATURE/I' LE TE
COUNTY UTII.YTIES APt2ELIMINARY DISC[JSSION HAS TAKLN PLACE ;AND GLIJERAL REQUI2EMENTS- FOIt
~UQMITTAL OF THIS P.ROP4SAL (IiAVC) (HAVC NOT) BE N'SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATGD:
WA''Ett PURVEYOR-FOR TNIS SITEjS ~ -ts f _=l~
A. COMMCNTS: C~ iLh, I' N+L-TF uOt C~~ .
5PSTGNA7URF1fITl: _ DA 'E
HEIALTH DISTRICT ecovi
A PitELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS'TAKEN PLACE AND GENCitAL RCQUIREMENTS FOR
SUI3MITTAL,OF THIS P OPOSAL (HAVE) (I•IAVE NOT) •BEE SATIS IED:
A. COMMENTS: G~G'~~' l? C2..`:-` I ~ ~
' ~ t• r ~
'SIGNATURE/C'IT ~ DATG-
SCWCR .I'URY~~Y4R '
A PREI.IMTIVARY DISCUSSION. NAS TAKEN PL- ACE AND GENCRAL R'FQUIREARiENTS FOR TNE
PROVIS[ON OF f',Ul3L[C SCW'CR ARC UNDCRSTOOD DY TI-1C APPLiCANT. A. COMMENTS: CIDO 0 ~C..T -TO Pulg L lC ~
~
~
~
~ SIGNATURFfT'iTLE- nATEI
's
1 ' .
a • • I3INDING=SITE PLAN APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART IYI
SURVEYOR VERI'FICATION"
I, TfiC UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSCD-LAND'SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE 1NrORMATlON
I2EQUESTED. .LEGAL DESCRTP'TION AND PREGIMINARY BINDRVG,S11'L-PLAN WAS BEEN PitEI'ART'D
DY ME OR UNDEtt-MY SUPERV[SION IN ACCQRDANCE-W ITH TE3E ItEQUII2EMENTS OF THE-
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONTNG/DINDING SI'`E.PLAN REGULATIONS'AND'THE LAW&OF THE STATE
OF WASHINGTON.
SIGNE DATL:
ADDRESS: aR E?V~~NEB~?/,NEr PHpNE: 328- 3371
A.
q 9Zo.,/
!v(o w L o A-VE ~R7KA,1~/Ej ZIP:
PAItT IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LCTI'CR Or- AUTHORIZATION)
I, TEiC UNDMSIGNLD, SWEAR OR AfFtRM UNDCR PENALTY OF AElt]URY THAT THE, ADOVC
RCSPONSHS ARE MADE TItUTHFULLY AND: TO 1'HE BEST OF MY KNOWLeDGE
i FURTHER SWEAR OR AFPiRM THAT I_ AM'THB OWNER OF RECORD OP THE AitE-A I'ROPOSED
~01t1HO.PREVIOUSLY 1DENT1tiIED-I.AND USE ACTiON. OR,1F NOT'THB 4WNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITN IS'WftITTEN, PE1tMtSStON PROM THE OWNe[t AUTHOEt1ZING MY AC't'rONS ON HIS!!-iCR
ACHALF:
umvp,r S4-i ( ~i•
DATL:
NAME:
Mumma
ADDRESS: PHONE:
ZIP:
' v ~
~
S G A~~E - PPL-ICANT OR REPRESENTAT[VE- DATE
i~.STATE-OF WASNINGTON )
) 'ss:
COUNTY,OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED.BEFORE ME"ON TH1S DAY OF
.4 BY ~ . ZGl~rY1L ~-+~f~QYI Lt5t~Y1 -
J' - '
V
.
-Natary Public in•and far Ihe State~of WAS ington
Resiciing At: Lwn 'Ll.Lk4e
My apnointment ezpires:
PART V
(TO.l3E COMPL--E'I'ED-BY THE 17IVISTON OF'IIUTL-DRJG AND PLA.,NNIN%
DATE SUIIMITTED: ~ FILL~ rA~rdl~ ( LQe Z~- j`''~.~~ ~
~ t . ~
DATC ACCL('TED: ` DY: 97
TOTAL FEES: - RCCEIPT 0: "--(3
.
h
. I
. . -
c'~1
jf ~ 1l
-
SP O K.~ N O U N'T Y
BUILDtNG•A1VQ PLAiVNNG • A D.N,lS]ON,OFTHE PUBLIC WQRKS.DEPARTI4.F~IT
JAMES L. NGwsotv. C.B.O., DttEcroR DENNtS M. Sco'rr, P:E.. DIRECTOR ~
MENiorialvDVM RECHVIED
TO: l=iacpe~f=S'~cikaneC ounty~Diu.ision, of?ghgineering ~AAY 2 3 1991
. _ : _ -
Jim Red, Spokane-County"Division of'Utilities
Steve Holderby, Spokane Regional. Health District ~BllIl~► El~iDBBIilI~
VVy,n Birkenthai, Spokane County Parks; Recreation & Fair
Steve, Worley, SfoRnwater Uti 1 ity
Bill Hemmings, Development Engineering Services
Greg,Figg,, Department of Transpoitation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine, Fueston, Spokane Transit Authoriry
Susan Winchell,-Boundary Review BoFird'
Central Valley School District'No. 3'56
Fire District No. 1
M'odem Electric Water Compan,y
~ FROM: Jobn Pederson, Senior Planner ~~C~r~ -
CDATE: May-23, 1997
RX.: Change of Conditions for ZE-18A-89
TECHIVICAL REVIEW-NIEETING
JLTNE _ 12, 1997 AT 2:15 ~
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANN11VG 19t FLOOR CONFERENCE' ROOM
*Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL- REV[EW MEET'1'NG FORM
for your comments: The Division of Btiilding and Planning,encourages your presence at,tliis
meeting. The -sponsor and representative have:,,been invited to also,attend. lf you can not attend,
,please forward.your review comment"s on the attached form'to Francine Sh1tir•-for the~mee'ting.
The attachetl TECHiVICAt-.,-REVIEW FORM wil) be given to the_sponsor at the mecting and
included in the Division of Building and Planning:file ('s.4 6ring three copies to the meefing).
Thanks for your cooperation. If-you have any questions about;ttie.application, please contACt
Francine Shaw of the Division of Building-and Planning at 456-3675.
NOTE: The Division of Buiicling & Planning svill now•be, cir,culatiug, comments for=SEPA
at the time ofuchnieal reyiew. This, will be rhe only time you will bc-abie to
comment, regarding the 'SEPA for this projecC:
NOTE: The applicran't will also'!ie submitting a Binding.Site Plan apptication for this
project.
c: Bernardn-W,ills Architects c/o Gary-Bernardot 107 S. Howard, Suitz420, Spokane,
V1JA. 99204
University,Gity; Inc., c%u Goodale & Barber, ~Companies, ?Ol W. North River
Drive,-S,pol:ane, WA-. 99201
Attachments: Technical Review Form, Application, Site.,Plan, Environmental Ghecklist
1026 WEST BEtOADvVAY AVENUE •$POKAIVG, WASHINcmN99260
PHovE (509)A56-3675 • FAx: (599) 0b-~703
TDD:, (509) 324-3166
• '
-Bernardo ° W i l l's
Arcllitects,, r.c.
A , i t ~ • ~ t ~ ~ r ~ -
. 1 I I I cr i' ► r,
ATTACHMENT # l.
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR A
'PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONE CHANGE
May 13, 1997
The.original conditions of approval'are reprinted'below. Proposed deletions to,the coaditions are noted with
a single line drawn throug6 the text (pmking); proposed additions to the condidons are nofed W-Ath highlighted
text x~'"~' • Commen folto~vs each condition offering.-exPlanation and/or J'ustification for the ProPosed
, .
modifications.
CONDtTIQNS OR CONTDVGENCIES APPL-1ED,T0 THLS APPR0VAL
1. All Conditions_ imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding, on the. "Applicant",
Which term shall includE~the otvner or o%vners,o£the property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest.
Coniment: No,changes proposed
2. That the:parking.variance request is approved for a ratio-not to exc,eed,5-9~~,parking.spaces 'per 1000
sq. ft: of gross leasable;area. Gross ieasable area in this iiistance inciudes those special uses, such as
ihe food court.
Comment: Unlike the original proposal, the curnent plawantic i pates a larger percentage of larger
"box-",tenants and fiewer small.tenants. The'tenants for ttiis proposaJ' will likeiy„ have
considerably: more warehouseJstbrage,spacc than is found in enclosed rnall tenaats.
Accordingly, the proposed parking ratio is reduced to 4.5 stalls per t'0004f. as -a
simplified methad of compnting required parking.:and takes into consideration the
` anticipated sfo'rage-a'rezis of the larger tenants. Additionally, thece is not a typical
mall-style food,court planned.
3. That ihe applicant shall. submit to the Planriing Director, for rcview and determination, the necessary
documentation as'specified within Section 14:802.140, Joint-Use Parkinq Reqpiremenx,s, prior- to
issuance of any,building- pennits.
Comment: Ng changcs proposed.
,Illi`it,~t 11~ I~ ~ ~tt'~i1'~ l ~ .`titt,Ilt• •I.'f 1 ~ `il~i ~~:,111~•, 1~1f /~'`~`~~11•I • I~lltl) ;~;;`ti--l~~ I I ~ ti 1'S~ ~.{ti-=~'1-~f I,~i
ti • . , . . .
4. That prior to the ielease of any, buitding permits:for this,sitc;, the-applicant shall sutimit, to the Planning
Director for r+eview and approval, or at his di'scretion at a public liearing b,efore the Hearing Examiner
Committee, a"Master Development Plan," wliich shall incorporaie all conditions of approval and
comply,%,v.ith the. Regionat Business (B-3) .zone .of the Zoning Code. Said. Master Development 'Plan
will be utilized to determine, phasins of the project.,and re'quired iinprovements.
Comments: No changes proposed.
5. - - , . - . .
, . -
Comments:. Delete this- condition in its entirety. This condition was appropriafe for a1arge
regional mall. The proposal is for.. a considerably reduced project compared to the
project.originaUy praiposad. Compliance with-the B3 zone-development standards as
required -by Coridition 3 above will be.sufficient.
6-. .
Developittegit , - - ~
hi a4dtlro" " '
- .be located at, major entrances to the shopping-,
center.
Commecits: the requirement, for a pedescriaii access:to the STA transit center was appropriate; for
a regional mall. Transit stops along the major streets on .3,sides of the project Will
be adequate 16:serve this, proposal.
7. All on-site lighting shall comply with the Regional Busiriess (B-3) zone and the Airport Overlay Zone.
Comments: No changes proposed.
S. That compliance with the 'landscaping standards of the Zoning Code shall 'be, provided for ~
n.,.
with required "208"` storm water drainage aneas to be located ~adjacent, to County
. -
.rights'of way or• as approved by the Plannins Director. Said lands"caping and "208" areas ma.y,,be
combined as, permitted by the. Planning-Director and.the County~ Engineer.
Comments: The appticant proposes to provide landscaping.and "208" storm water retention for
newly paved and developed areas. Much of the proposal includes existing parking
-areas and buildings. Compliance With "208" giiidelines -is not practical _for-existing
parking lois.
9. 200.0.. . , .
Comments: Delete.condition it its;,entirety. This condifion is specific to an enclosed regional mall
on1y. Landscaping of newly -devetoped site areas will , be,in accordance with 113
development standards.
, .
10. - - '
, . zeio sig!TS alc~rsbq
- _ . MR'
qe~-~xc}e s,~Iteached signs shaU be as permitted by the Regional Busic~ess (~B-3)e~z.one
im, ♦ wr ' r.,i,:'• S4 M M : ~Y•ti +r } 'rrn4:}v'v r vC'~4'
~ . ~ / Er x• y v~~~ f~~':~~..~]' vy?'a S { < 'vJ■' { !
. {e ai1{1 r h I {~1{5 v4 a.1 I • ~•.L • .l ~r . .~1~ih . l
r.A • A~;~~/~V4\~ ` r. '•JlN.~'.'. ,.`~..:~'..''"~•l•!•, J
1• . f~ rct~.. 3ttiV,. .7,,h,~ }"•vy vv
Comments: The condition as originally Written Js for an enctosed regional wall and not
appropriate for a shopping center with multiple parcels and Fr.eestanding tenants.
11. That;those conditions -and agreements entered into, regarding the barricading of the gravel packing ,lot
(file *ZE-5047) shall be binding and.'continue until such time as _redevelopment of die site occurs.
Comments: No, changes proposed.
COUNTY PLANNiNG DEPARTMENT
l. Thatthe~followingdescribad property- shall be,approved:to.the'B-3 Zone'and all.current-standards of
the Zoning Cod'e.as amended shall be complied with in the dcvelopment of this site.
Se,e*.updated legal -description includ'ed wiih the applicatioa form.
2. Planning Dinector%designee shall approve -a -specific exterior lighting plan for, the approved area prior
to iiLstallation of such lighting-. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination fo the area With full
cvnsideration to, adjacent,properties)..
Comments: No changes proposed..
3. The, aPPlicant'shall d'eveloP , subJ~ect ProPertYgeneraltY ~ in accordance within the, conce Pt
.
presented :to die Hearins Examiner Committee. Variations, when approved by the Planning
Director/designee, will be -permitted, including, but not limited to, the~ foUowing change"s: building.
location,, landscape plans; and generai allowable uses of the _permitted 'zone. All yariations must
conform to,regulations set., forth in the ZONING CODE -FOR SPOKANE COLTN7'Y. The 'original
intent of 'the development plans shall be maintained.
Comments: Proposed change is: intended to update this condition to current circumstances:
4. The project is subject to ,Section 14.706,,the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the ZONING
CODE TOR SPOKANE COUNTY, which sets forth various meas,ures for,Aquifer protection;
specifically, measures dealing with v~iastewater disposal, spill protection measures, and storm water
ninoff.
Comments: No changes proposed:
5., The present proposal is riot detaited enough to determine whether or not tlie use of or materials stored
of'the
on the site are in compliance widi Section 14:706 (Aquifer Sensitive_ Area Overlay 2one)
ZONING' CODE FOR 'SPOKANE, COUNTY. Accordingly, as a. condition -of approval, the
sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with the Spokane County Auditor, within t}iicty (30) days
of the signing -of Findings and 6rder of ihe final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the'Public" which
shall provide in material as follows:
• . • • .
PRIOIZ TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERIVUT OR= CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY.FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE, ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFT'ER, THE APPL'-ICANT SHALL BE"RESPONSIBLE;FOR-COMPLYING WITH Tf3.E
PRUVISIONS QF THE ZONING CODE'FOR SPOKANE COUNTY SECTION 14.706 (AQUIFER
SENSITNE AREA OVERLAY ZUNE). TEIE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF 7HIS
NOTICE IS- MORE- PARTICULARLY. DESCRTBED AS FOLLOWS...".
Comments: No changes proposed.
6: -Applicant shall comply with `208' recommendations concerning storm water runoff and. provide
1i4, ;..•r' :+,,%y/•:r~~. necessary'landscaping forrunoff,?~
_
Commenis: Proposcd chanse is 'intended to update this cond'ition to' cucren't circumstances.
7. An division, of_.land -for the purpose, of sale, lease or --traosfer, shatl comply witti RCW 58:17;
<ti' ;•s.~ h a v~ -
and the~Spokane CountyPlatting, Ordinanccs prior to issuance of building
.•ii'r r vrw _ _
peI7t11LS.
Comments: Proposed change is intended to update .tNis condition to.current- circumstances.
8. 'The Spokane County'Planning Deparhnent shall propare,and record with-the Spolcane County. Auditor
a"Titlt Notice" notiog that the property, in quesCion, is subject to a variety, of special coriditions
imposed-as a, resliit of 'approval of a land use action. This "Title Notice" shall serve as official public
notice regarding conditionsof.approval affecting the. property.,in question. The."Title Notice" shall
be recorded witliin fifteen (15) days of final -disposition -of the approved land use action, and ~siiall only
be extinguislied by the Spokane County- Planning Department. The "Title Notice" shall generally.
provide as follows:
The~parcet of property legally described.as (legal tlescriptio» ancl taxpnrcel niunber) ~is the'subject
of a land use action, imposing -a,variety of special development conditions, by a SPokane County
Heariag Body or Administrative Official on (cla~e), and as maybe amended, altered or supplemented
by official action orzalready changed. File No. (Plari,iing bepar,tment f%ile Number) is, avaiiabte,for
inspection and copying in the Spokane•County i'lanning Department.
Comments: No changes proposed.
9. A specific landscape plan, ptanang schedule and provisions.for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane
County Planning, Dircctor%designee shall be submitted'*' _ h forthe project prior
to release of building pemiit.
Comments: A performance, bond is :not . aecessary to. ensure compliance with landscaping
requirements.
_ " • , s , .
COUNTY ENGINEERJNG DEPARTMENT
Prior TQThe, IsWnce OfA BuildiaLLermit Or Use, Of Thp PrQne~rV As Pr,Qpose,d:
1. Applicant shaU petition the,Boand of County Commissioners-for-the~vacation of ~Dartmouth Road fro~n
4~':+ . .4.» x~
. . : ~ .
`l•J:~:i"f'¢.'~y,N
Si7►•
~VVVG___ _
Comments: Proposed change is intendcd io update 'this condition to, current circumstances. It
would not'be necessarylo vacate Dartmoath Road for Phase -I for example.
2. _ _ _ - -
q. " . _ _3,
,
3 - . . . fos '
3. - . _ - . . foi ' ,
4. - . : . . . ,
. _ . ~
Comments: Delete-this condition, entirely. -L-Jniversity Road right-of-way, has been previously
acquired and road improvements are`complete:
3. Access pernlits for approaches to the County Road 'System'shall be obtained from die -Spokaae County
Engineer-:
Coinriients: No changcs proposed.
4. _ . die-s&ticin . •
Enght ' Offi . . , - - .
Comments: Delete ttiis condition entirely.. Uaiversi .ty Road has becn improved to ' current
standards.
5. Applica"t 4 . - • - . _ _ . , hiela
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. IntersecEion improvements have -bcen cocnpleted.
6. . • . . _
Comments: Delete this condition enfirely. Tiiis condition was specific to a regional mall
development:which was consiclerably larger tlian die currcnt proposal.
• ' .
' . t . .
7. _ , .
Comments: Delete this -condition entirely. T1ii,s conditiion was specific to a regional mall
development which was considerabty larger than the current proposal.
8. . _ . -
eE-~ , hAffic
Comments: Delete this condition entire_i.y. This condition was specifc to a regional mall
development wtiicti-was considerably larger- than the„current-proposal.
9. . . _
Commenfs: Delete ttiis condition entirely. This condition was specific to a regional maU
development which was considerably IargeT t}ian the current proposal.
10.. -
,Comments: Delete tlus condition entirely. This' condition was specific to a regional .malt
•development which was coasiderably larger• than ihe current proposAl.
11. . . _ : - - , and . _
Comments: Delete this, condition entirely. "This condition -%vas, specifi"c to -a regional mall
development which was,considerably Iarger than the current, proposal.
12. The applicant shall submit, for approval :by the - Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County-
Heaith District a detailed,combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal'-plan "for
the-entirc,piroject or-any portion thereof, if the'development is to be phased.
~ -
Comments: No changes proposed.
13. A parking plan and traff'ic circulation plan sllall be,submitted and appro,ved by, the Spokane County
Bngineer. The design, locatioq and arrangement of parking staUs'shall be in accordance with standard
traffic -engine;ering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved b.y ihe. County Engineer,, %vill be
required for any portion of the project which is to'be occupied or traveled b.y -vehicles.
Comments: No changes proposed.
14. - . - - . -
Comments: Delete this condition entirely. This condition was speciFc to a regional matl
development which was considerably larger than-d.ie current proposal.
. . • f
, . . . ' • :
15. All requirad,impmve'ments shall conform to the current State of Washington,Standard Specifications
for Road and bridge Construction, and otlier applicable-County standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining td Road Standards and Storm v+►ater Manageniebt in;effect at the date of constructioq unless
-otherwise appraved by the County Engineer.,
Comments: No changes"proposed. M'Ivvaukee 1.6. . - . _ -
, .vodi .
1V,VX"lAnulARL"U.. d.
Cominents: This,condition is rio longer applicable to the proposed plan:
17. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drairiage plan requirements are found in Spokane
Board of County Commissioners' Reslolution No. 80-1592 as amended and aze applicable to this
proposal.
Comments: No changes proposed.
18.
Comments: Delete conditions entirel.y. This conditioo was originally- intended to apply to the
requiced Sprague Avenue and University Road impTOVements. No improvernents in
public right-of-ways other than -driveway.s and possibly utility connections are
proposed..
COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
No changes to conditions are proposed.
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRLCT
No changes -to conditions are proposcd.
COUN'I'Y BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
IVo changes -are proposed.
WATER PURVEYOR
No changes to conditions proposed.
SPOKAN'E COUN'I'Y AIR POLLU.TION CONTROL AUTHORYTY
No chaages to conditions proposed.,
~
• • '
. ,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
: - . .
~for
-.University "Ciry Rede.velopment
~
May 134, ~ 1997
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
WAC 197-11-960
Prepared 6y-~
B °W°A
-Bernardo Nius
Arolitects, .1'.C:
P I a.n ,n i n g,
A r c It i t e.c•1'u-r e
n! e r'i a r g.
107•auutis Hciw;%4
-Suite 420
SP4ane, il•'A ' 99204
~(St79) :.38~-45,1'I '
SrOKANE. EIWIR.ONMENa'AL QR.UINAh.,, WAC 197-1 l-960.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
PURPQSE OF CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Poticy Act (SEPA)-chapter 43:21 C RCW,.r.eguires all governmental agencies to
consider the enviconmental impacts of a proposal before naaking decisions. An environmental impact
state"ment (EIS) musi be prepared for all. proposa]$` with prob"able 'significant adverse impacts- on the quality
'of the environment. 7'he:pur,pose-of this checklist is to~ provide information to help you and the, agenc.y
identify impacts from your proposat (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it 'can be done)
aad to help the agency decide whether ao. E1S is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICA-NTS
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about .your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist-.tv determine whetheuthe environmental impacts of your proposal
are significant, requiring preparation of an ETS. Answer the -questions briefly,, with. the rinost precise
information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answec each question accurately and 'carefully, to the best of your- knowledge. In most cases,
you should.be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you rzall.y.-do not, know the answer, or if the question does not apply to your proposal,
write "do,not know" or "does not apply,". Complete ariswers to ihe question now may avoid unnecessary
delays 'later.
Some.ques.tions ask about governinental. regulations, such as, zoning, shoreline and iandmark designativns.
Answer these:questions if yoq can. If .you have problems, the governmental.agenc;es can assist you.
The checklist quesNons appl.y, to all parts af your proposal, even if y,ou ,plan to do them over a period 'of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will- describe -your proposal
or its~environmental effects. The -agency to whicb you submit this~ cbecklist may' ask ,you to explain your
answers or provide additional informaiion reasonably related to determining if-there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS
Complete this checklist for nonproject pr,oposals, even though questions~ may be answered "does not
apply". IN ADDTI'ION,.complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEt'I' FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part
D).
For nonprajeCt actions, the reference~in the checklist to the wocds "project," "applicant" and "property
or,site" should be read as "proposat;" ""proposed" and paffected,geographic area", respectively.
A. BACKG'ROUND
l. Nome of proposed project, if applicoble: Uni'versit.y City Redevetopment
2. Name af applicaRt: University City, Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicairt and contoct person: Gary M. Bernardo, AIA
Bernardo-Wills Architects, PC
S. 107 Howard, Suite 420
Spo.kane, WA .99204
(509) 838-4511
'
. ,
• 4. DQte cltecklist pr.epat rd: May 12, 1997.. . .
, , .
5. Agency requesting checklist: Spokane County Planning, Department
6. Prop.o.sed timing or_schedule rncluding phasing,_~if opplicable):
Phase I, Devetopment to begin Summer 1997, Phase 41 Development undetermined.
7. cr. Do you_ have any, plans for future additions, expvnsions, or fzrrther activity relvtetl to or
connected, with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
b. Do.. you own or have. options on land nearby, or -adjace'nt to the this project? If yes,
explqin:
Yes. U,niversity City.owns, several, parcels -south o'f ttie South Valley Arterial right=af-
way. They,.are not -contiguous to the subject parcel.
8. List any environmentol infornration y,ou lotow,abocu thut hos been prepared or will be prepared
directly.relateci~to this_propASQI:.
None known. Environmental documents for pcevious projects and different developers have, been
reviewed by Spokane' County (ZE-50-87, ZE-18-89, and VE-38-89).
9. Do you know whether opplications are .pending.., fnr governmental approvuls of other .proposols
directl.y affecting, the property.covered,by ynur-proposal If, yes, ezplain:
An appiication for Change of Conditions for-,proposed cev.isions to previous re-zone approval will
bz-processed concurrently with this action.
10. L;ist ony government approvalsor pernilts that will be needed for your p"roposal, if,kno►vn.
Change. of Conditions; Binding gite Plan approval; building perinits'.
H. Give abrie,f,.contplete description of your proposal, i,eclcrding,the proposed- uses Qnd -the size of
the project ond site. 71jere ore sMrol guestions later ui this checklist that ask' you. to describe
certain~-a`spects o,f y.our proposal. You do aot need to repeot. tho'se cr»srvers on this. page.
The proposal is to redevelop the*existing, University City,Sbopping C.enter with new -and reloCated
retail buildings.to better respond to cunent market-demands.. Many existing large.and small tenant
spaces are currentty empty or underutilized. Key etements of the project,include:
► Demolition of,bld "Rosauers" building. and reconsiruct new supermarkei in same location~.
► Demolition selected portions _of the enclosed mall and open.existing tenant.spaces for Sprague
Avenue exposure. .
► Develop pad parcels along Sprague Avenue and the South Valley Arterial for sta.nd alone
tenants.
► Reclevelop existing.shopping center on- the west side of Dartmouth Road. 7'hese buildings will
orient -to the to-be-construc'ted South Valley Arterial.
► Develop land pa_rcels on the south side of the existing buildings to. face the to-be-constructed
Sbuth valley Ar-terial.
► Vacate Dartmouth*Road south of,Sprague Avenue.
. •
. 12. Location oj the proyo~sal. Give sufficaent' inforynation .,t'or o pt. .i understand the precise
location of your proposed project, 41ncluding'a street addr,ess•, jany, anrl section, township and
.range, fImown. Ija p►=oposnl-would occur over a range of, orea; provide the range or boundories
of t&' site(s). Provicle a. legal description, site plan, viclniry mop, and top.ogrophic -mvp, if
-reasonably avQilable. While you should siibmit ony plans required by'the agency, you ore not
requlred to tlupllcate maps or detailed plans submitted winc any penrrit Qpplicdtions related io , Ciits
checklist.
The project- is located in S.ection 20, Township,25-North, Range 44 East. It compcises, the existing
University City Shopping Center and University City West bbunded- on, the north by Sprague
Avenue, on the east b,y Universiry ~Road, on the -south, b.y the South Valley' Arterial right-of.=way,
and on the west by Walnut' Roacl.
13: Does the proposed octron lie within the Aquifer Sea'sitive Area (AS'A)??he Gerreral Server Serviee
Area? ?he Priority-Sewer-Service Area?' ?he Qy~of Spokanel (See Spokune Counry,'s ASA
overlay- zone otlas for boundories).
The, project is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA), the General Sewer Service Area (GSSA),
.the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). It does not Iie- within, the City of Spokane.
EVALU ATION
B. ENVMONMENTAL ELEMENTS
l: Earth
a. Generul description of the.,site (Flat, ro!ling hills, steep -slopes,
mountoinous, other:.'
The site'is, flat and cunently.developed with a variety,, of existing
retail buildings with paved parking -areas and very little
vegetation. Some portions of the-site to the south of the existing
buildings are undeveloped. -
b. What' is the steepest slope o,n the site (approximQte pereent
slope).? Steepest sl"ope is.:approximately. 5, o.
c. What general rypes ojsoils' are jo.und on the sue (for earample:
c''lay; sand, gravel, peat, muckp If y,ou,kmo►v rlie cIvssi#cotlon
of agriculntra!-soils, specify them arrd note any prime farmlund.
Sandy gravel common to Spokane Valley.
,
d. Are there su.rface inclications- or history of unstoble. soils in the
immeelivte viciniry? If so, describe. No.
• . .
e. Describe the purpo~r,, rype "and apprbrfmote qcsantities.of any
frlling or grailing proposed. 1►tdica« sourca of fill.
.Minor regrading -of uncleveloped land wi11 be done. Cut-.and -ti11
.are exPected to balance. No signif cant amount of fill is
anticipated.
f: Could. erosion,occur.'os a, rescclt of clevrin'g, constructio,n, or;use?
If ;so, generally describe.
Some minor erosion, could pccur during constniction period b.ut
can be :controiled.
W. Aboitt whut percent oJ the -site wilt be covered tivith impervious
sur, faces a, f?er project coristruction (for example; asphnlt or
buildingsP
Approximately 90%.,
h. Proposed mecrsures to" redu'ce. or contr,ol erosion or other impacts
to the eqrth, if any.
Long -term erosion will be.controlled by buildings and parking
areas: All non-impervious surfaces will be landscaped 'or re-
vegetated.
2. Air
v. -What rypes of emissions to the air would result fran the nroposal
(i. e. ,,dust; Qutomobile. odors, intlccstrial wood smoke) during
eonstniction and when.the project is eompleted?. '1, f ony,generolly
clescrilie and give vppro,Yimate quantities. if -known:
Some increase in dust duriiig constcuetiarn operations; some,
increase in automobile emissions due-to increased trip generation.
b. Are Mere nny -off-site sour.ces of emissions or odor Viat mQy: effiect
your proposat? If so, genervlly describe.
No
c. Proposed mecrsures. -to rMuce or control emiss'ions, or other
impacts to- air, .,if any.
Efficient access' po'ints and travel lanes to minimize .on-site
circulation time.
.
S. Water . ,
. ,
a. Surfuce
1. Is there nny surface water bo,dy on or in the fmmedtnte vicintry
oj the site (including year r.ound " und seasonul streams,
sQltwdter, lakes,.ponds, wetlands)? .If yes, descr,iberypeand
provide--names. If uppronriute,. state whdt stream or river it
flows into.
No
2. Will the project requir,e work over, inor adjucent.to (within
200 jeet) the descritied waters? If yes, pleuse- describe and
uttuch available plans.
Nou.applicable
3. Estlmnre,the nmorurt offi!l and dredge, nio"leriul that -would be
pl'aced,-in or' re►noverl from surfqce water or wetlonds 'and
indiccrte.the, Qrea of the -site that . would - be affected.
Not applicable
.4. 'WIII the proposol require surfqce woter withdrawls or
diversion,s? Give geRerul descrrption, purpose; -Qnd
appr, oximote quantities.
Not appl icable
S*. Does the, proposal lie - within o100 y,eur , jlood plain? If
so, note location on the site.plan.. Ko
6. Doe.s the:proposQl involve.any,ciischarge of waste mater.rals -to
surfQCe waters? -IJ so, ;describe the type oj wuste and
anticip.ated volame of discharge.
No
b. Gr'oiuttl
1: Will groiurd ,wvter we witftdiawn,, or ►vil1 -water be discharged
to ground woter? Give generul description; purpose otui
approximute qunntities..
Yes. Some.storm water runoff will be, discharged into the
ground through the,use ofnew~,and existing.drywells.
.
• . . I
2. Describe ►vaste m..reriuls tliat wiU be discftrged into the
ground Jrom septic tanks or other sonitary woste lreatment
faciliry. Describe th'e generul size of -the sy,stem, the number
of houses to be,served, or humuns the. sj►stem(s), ure expected
to serve.
No sanitary-waste will be discharged into the, ground.
3. Descrihe any systems, other than -those designed for the
disposol of sanita .ry. wqste; instolled jor fhe purp.,ose of
dischargin`g Jluids beloiv the ground surface rincludes systems,
such as those jor the disposal ojstorin witter or drainnge from
,ftoor dr,oins). Describe -the rype of system, tlte amount -of
materiul -to be disposed of tlirougli tlte -system and the types-~ of
moterials likely to be disposed of fiacluding muteriuls .wlrich
may enter the system irrodvertenrly,,through spills or os a result
of.firefighting activities):
Storm water runoff ftom some parking areas and some roofs,
will be discharged into the ground. through the use of drywelis
and storcn water detention swales in__acCOrdance wit}i, County
"208" storm water management guidelines. The use of
existing drywells 'for existing roof and parking areas will
cootinue.
4. Will mry chemicals (especially orgnnic solvents or petroleum,
fuels) be stored in above-ground or underground storage
tctnks'? If so, whot rypes Qnd quantities of muterials will be
stored.?
No .
5. What protective measures ►vill be..tQken to insure that leaks or
spills of any chemicQls stored or used _dn site will not be
a!lowed "to percolQte to groutuiw.ater. (this inclecdes measures
to--keep chemiccils out of disposal systems described in 3b(2)
curd 3b(3)?
If chemicals are :ever stored -on site; the,y would be subject to
specific containment anci storage standards to prevent
accidental discharge. Cfiemicals 'as a result of'storm water-run
off from new. parking, ar,eas witl be filtereri tlirough u208"
drainage swales.
C. Water Runoff (inclciding, slorm,►vvter).
l. Describe, the source of runoff rncluding storm'►vuterJ and
metliod of collection und clisposal, in any (incliidin$ _quanti .ry,
in. known). Where ►vilFVis water flo►v? Wi!l this water flow-
into ,other waters? If so, rlescribe.
Storm water run-off wi]1,result-from new and exWing .parking
lots -and roofs. Drainage from existing roofs and par-king
surfaces will remain unchanged. Drainage fiom new roofs and'
parking surfaces will -be dicected to "208" drainage swales.
2. Wr« arry che►iricals ue stored, hartdled- or «.sed on the srte• in a -
locatron where a spill or leA- wi!! -druin to surface or
groundwcuer or to a storm %wuter disposal s:ystem dischqr-ging
to .surface or groundwaier?
No
~su ,uce -waters?
3. Could wasCe materials enter 8r.ount! of ~l
.
'Generolly describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surfdce, ground, and
riuwff wuter impacts, f any rif the proposed oction lies within-the
Adliifer Sensitive Area be espticially clear on expJunvtions
relatiag:to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), ond-3c(2)
of rhis checklist.
Project will be. constructed in accordance -with County "208"
siorm water management gvidelines.
4. Plants
a: Check.-or circle,types of vegetution J.'ound on the, site:
The majority of,the site has -buildings or ~paved surfaces with
minimal ' amounts of landscaping on 'site. There. is no native
vegetation.
b. What 4nd arrd amount ~of ve9etotion will be removed,or oltered ?
Existing landscaping areas may be modified and/or refurbished.
c. List tlireatened -or endangered speties korown to be on-.or near the
site.
None known,
d. Proposed lcrntlscnpfng, use ojnative.plunts, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on, the site, ijuny.
Landscaping will be developed in selecteci areas at the site
per-imeter and' in the-new parking, areas:
5. Animuls
a. Circle any birds onil animdls whicli have been observed,on or
neur the site or ure known to-be on or near the ;site:
Some urban bird species such as sparro,ws and songbirds may be
observed. IVo mammals have been observed.
. • . ; -
b. Lrst arry ,threatened or rndnngered species knoKw to be on.or near _
the site. None known
~ c. Is the 'site pvrt o'f a migrolion route ? If so; explain.
Not known
d. Proposed meosures. to.pr.eserve or enlian"ce wilcllife, if uny:
Trees may provide nesting,sites for birds.
6. Energy and NaCurnl Resources
a. What k7nds of,energy (electtic, naturul, gas, oil, »lood sto.ve,.
solar) will b.e,used -to meet the- completed projeci's'energy -needs?
Describe -whettier ir will be used for heoting, 'manufaeturing, etc.
Natural.gas will be used for heating, electric- will be: used for
cooling and illu_mination.
b. Would your pro, fect Qffect the potential use of solar energy' b.y
arljacent propenies.7 If so, generally- describe.
No,
c. What kind of energy conservQtion feQtures Qre Included -in the'
plans of this pr.oposol? List oiher proposed measures..to reduce
or control energy, impacts, if a,ry.
Project will.comply substantiall.y w.itli Non-Residential Eneeg,y
Code.
7. ~Environmental Health -
a. Are there' any environmentul health haiurds, inclriding ezposure
to' toicic chemieals, -risk offire' ond e.xplosion, spills, or hazurdous
wuste., thuf coulcl occur Qs a re'siitr of - this proposal ?~If so..,
'descr,ib.e.
Nane known
l. Describe specio!,emergency' services tliat.miglrt. be reqitired. '
Local police; -fire, ambulance and similar readily available
emergency. services may be cequired.
-2. Proposed wasures -to reduce or control environm'ental
health~,hazards, jony.
~ Not applicable
. b: Noise . .
.
l, tiVhat type =of,noise .exisrs in the, ctreo rfliich may affect. your proposQl ? (for example: -tra~`'tc, equipment. operution)
Existing noises in the,area .are primarily -traffic noises which
are not, expected to,, affect the project.
2. Whot, types and levels of noise would be created by, or
associated wlth the project on a shon-term or a long-term
basis? (for exomple: truffic, constructioR; operations., oiher)
Indicate what hours, noise w+vcdd come from site.
Short term noise increase will result from. ccinstntction
activity. Some increase in no.ise, will result from: increased trip
-operation.
3. Proposed meascires to, redu'ce or control noise inrpncts,
ij Qny.
Long term, noise will be buffered in selected areas by
I'andscaping. Additionally, existing public right=of=way
distances will also provide -some mitigation.
8. Lsind and Shareline Use
a. What -is the current use of the site a►id.adjacent properties?
Retatl Shopping Center
b. Hus tlie site been. itsedjor asriculture? 1Jso, describe.
The site has not- been used for agriculturai. uses since,about 1953.
c. Describe ny n structures on the site.~
Existing structures. consist of a variety of single story,commercial
retail buildings built hom approximately 1960 to 1990.
d. Wi1! Qny structures be demolished? Jf so, whQt.
Selected buildings will be deimolished. Phase I demolition,will.
include the existing Rosauers Super-market and a portion of'the
-enclased matl inmmediately adjacent to Rosauecs. Additional
demol ition is 1 ikely; but not. yet de _fined.
e. 'W)iat is,the current zoning, clossi, ficalion bf the site?
B-3
f What-is~the current compreh'ensive plan designorion of t1te site-?
Major Commercial
g. If upp,licable, ►vhat is` llie CUrrent shorellne' Muster ,rrograrn
designation of the site?
Not applicatile
h: Nas' an.y, part of the ,site been clussi, fied us,. on environmentally
sensitive area ? lf .so, speeify.
No
i. -Approximatel.y. how may people would reside or work in the
completed project?
Nn people wilt -reside in the project; approximately 100,'to-200
will work there.
j. Approxinwtely how mQny people would,the coinpleted project
ilisplace'?
None
k: Proposed measures-, to avoid or-rerluce displocement impocts; if
any.
Nbt applicable
1. Proposetl meusur,es to ensure tlie prop,,osal is compatible ►vith
if any,
ezisting und.projected~,land uses nnd'plctns; -
The proposal is consistent with the 'Comprehensive- Plan, current
zoning and use, adjacent parcels, aad projected corrimercial
development.
9. Housing
a. Approximotely how many- units would be provided, if any?-
Indicate, whether,high,.miJdle; or low -income housing..
None
;b.. Approximotely,how many units, if uny,, would be eliminnted?
Indicute i'vhether high; mlddle, or low-income housing..
None
c. Pr,oposed meusures,,to rediice or,control hottsing impacts, V,nny.
Not appl icable
,
, -
• ' . 1.0. Ae$thetics ~ ' ' •
, .
a. What is 1he tallest helght of~ any proposed structure(s), not
including antennvs; whcct is the principol exterior building
material (s) proposed ?
,New and eicisting buiidings will, have: a maximum height ;of
anproximately 15'. Principal exterior ~ material will be aggregate
:stucco and%or--decor:ative concrete masonry 'units.
b. What viesvs in the- immediote viciniry, would be oltered or
obsirucied?
None
C. Proposed measures, to'reduce or cantrol aesthetic impacts, f Qny. The project will :comply with applicable zoning; code, development
-standards such as landscaping, tieigbt restrictions, setbacks, lot
-coverage, etc.
11. Light and Glare
u. VVhut ry'pe of light or glare will the. propose! produce? What time
of-dcry would it moinly occur?
'Parking lot lighting, ,building decorative and security ligtiting,
, illuminated signage, automobile tieacllights.
b: Could lighror glare from thefinished project he a,.sufery hazdrd
or interfere witli views?
No
c: What. existing off-site source oj light or glore'may affect y,our
proposol ?
None known
d. Proposed meQSUr"es tio reduce or control lighuond ;glare impacts,
-if any.
Parking- lot l,ight's_ will be source-shielded 'type,' building lighting
is fa'r',enough from..property`Iines,, and new-parking "ar,eas will be
.shieldetl'by perimeter landscaping.
_12. Recreation
a. What designaled,ond 7informal recreationol opponunities are, in
the immediate ,vicirrity?
Balfour Park is:approximately, 4 blocks- away.
. .
b. Would the proposed, project displacer,vny ei~isting recPeational
: ,
uses:? If so, describe.,
No
c. -Proposed,meirsur,es to- reduce or rontrol 'impQCts on -recreatial,
incliiding recrevtionvl opportunities to be pro.videJ by the
,project, f ony.,
Not applicable.
13. Historic- and Cultucal Preservation
a. Are tjlere any places or objects listed .on, or . propased for;
nationul, stvte, or_locQ1 pr.eservation registers known to be on,or,
:.next ta-the site,? If,so describe:
None known,
b. GenerQlly descr,ibe~ any landmark:s or evidence of historic,
archdeological; sciendfic, or cultttr,al -importQnce known,to-be on
-or next to,,the site.
None known
c. Proposed measures to rerluce, or control impacts, Ifany.
,Not applicable
14. Tr•ansportatio.n,
a. Idenrify public streets and highways serving-the-site, and-describe
pr,oposerl vccess, to the,ezisting-street sy,xtem. Sho►v,on site plan,,
if any:
Ttie site is served b.y -Sprague Avenue, University Roacl, and, the
-proposed South Valley Arterial.
b. Is site currently served, by public -transit? It' not, whovts the
upproximete distunce to the:nearest trQnsit stop?.
;
The site is served b.y public transit sEops on Spragve and
University Road.
c. How mony, pQrking,spaces would the completed project have?
How many would be project eliminate?
Approzimately 2,3.00 -.2,400 par;king stalis.
, • . -
d.- Will, the proposul re'yuire any. -new rostcls- or otr-eets, or -
improvements to edisting roa.& or Streets, not including
drive►vays.? If so., genernlly describe rincluding whetfier public or
private.)
No
e. W,ill tjie project tue (or- o.ccur in the-;immediate vicinity ofi wQter,
rail or air transponution ? Geaerall y descr. ibe:
No
f. How' many ,vehlculvr trips per day i+roultl be gener,cued by the
completed project? If known,. indicate. peak hours.
Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual, the existing: 310,OOO.s1. center generates
approximately 14,500 Average We8kday Vehicle Trips. The
additional 200,000 s.f. .(at fu11= build-but) will generate
approximately 5,200 additional weekday trips. 7'hese figuresAn
not take into consideration "pass b_y" ~or, Gdiverted link tcips"
already using the existing arterial, system. Weekday~ peaks, can be
expected'between 4;00 p.m.,and 6:00 p.m. with the most traffic
being oo Saturday.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control tr.ansp_.ortcition impQCts,
f Qn3'• :
Vehicle access to the project will be spread over- all -four
, perime(er streets with controlleddriveways and turning
movements.
15. Public.Servi~es
a. Would theproject result in un increused neQd jor public servic'es
(jor example: fire, protectim, police pr,otection, liealth care,
. schools, o[her)? 'If so, :.generally'describe.
Expansion of the shopping center may create an lncreased aeed
for basic emergency services but 'it is exnected that current
facilities will be sufficient. No additional demand will 'be placed
on the health care system or publ ic school, system.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control impact on public
services; ij any:
'None
, •
16. UtIlItICS c • •
.
, a. Circle utilities currently available,cu the site: electric' natural
as, water, refiuse cer-vice,- telephone.
b. Descrihe the utiltties t/tat Qre.pr,oposed for the project, -the utility
provicling the,servtce, and the genero! construction activlties on
the site or in the i»imediate viciniywhich might be- needed.
Existing utility infirastructure is available in ailjacent public right-
o-F ways, to,serve project.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the, penalry. of perjury that the above respon.ses are ~nade t.ruthfully and
, to the best of my knowledge. I-, also understand th~at, should there be any willful misrepresentations of
willful lack of-fuil disclosure on my part; the agencX- may w.ithdraw any determination of nonsignificance
that it might issue'in relianee upon this rhecklist.
Date: May .997- Proponent: Hernrd'o=Wilk Architects. PC for Univercirv. Citv inc_
Ptoponent:__~ Address: S. 107 Howard, Suite 420
Phone: (,509) :83$-45 l-1 SRokane_ WA 99204
Pecson Completing Form: Garv. Bern rdo_ Arch'itect. AIADate: May 997
Phone: f509 838,4511
FOR S'TAFF USE ONLY
Staff Memb'er(s). Reviewing Checklist:
Based, oa cbis staff review of the,enuironmental checklist- and.'other p,ertinent _information, the staff:
A. Conciudes- that there are -no, probable significant adverse impacts and r,ecommends .a
determination of-norisignificance.
B. Concludes that probable ~signif cant adverse, environmental impacts exist for ,the current
p'roposal and~ recommends a initigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions.
C. Concludes that there are probable signif cant adverse environmental impacts and rec;ommends
a'determination of significance.
.
` I
SCOUNTY DIVIS'l ON OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
~ , ►t+~ S"~'~
CHANGE OlC CONDITIONS FOR A ;,t~ i~- ~ _ .
PRE'VIOUSLY AIaPRO +'D 2.'ONE CHANG'r]C+ ~11
= ~~~JtL(~I~ICa
pl ~Ac~D Pl~;l-:i':11JG
Date: MAy 13 Iqq-7 APp.I ication.No. ~Q ~
Name Of AnplicanVRepresentative: GARY 008;IARb AR44MLM;
Mailing Address: 107 15. flc~~ 44417r- ¢20.
City,:, State: k" Zip: 4f92o¢
Phone: 838- ¢S/I (Work) 8a9- 9405 -{44ef"e}- F~X
Exisring-Zone Classification: 83
Date Existing-Zone Classification Established: 14 8 q u
Legal DescriPtion of Property: 59r= ATt*4W5-:1
Section 2_o Township 25 Range f 9'
Source-of Legal: ~YCmQ j5l/ErrA&2WjN6► 4 ,i4s955.TCW RaFccws
P1rcel-No.: 0201. ofoq ? 4520/. o2.ro,, 45'ZOva3oS.* ¢s2o~.0•~~3~ g520/• 13o*, 952v/. 2305
PROPOSE I) CHA.NGE OI' CONDITYONS .
Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval, .(Cite- the appl:icablecondition from the
rincf.ings and Order ofthe Hearing Examiner Committee's public,hearing).
Give detailed explanatian,of~request for change.in -ctatus 60he peoposal.
If,development of the- site will lie :changed substantiAily' by this request, or the property has
'boundaries different than originally prop.psed, a revised 'development plan must be submitted.
~
Signature of Applicant or Agent Address if different tilan Applicant
Rev. *1196; sam
I ~
03/15:97 07: 40 $50,8:1 :4 TA1LOR ESGISEER ~0.02
. That portion of S6or-t Plat .No. SP-1019-95 and that portion of the Plat of Opportunity, as per
Plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, 21, 22 and 23 i-n the Northeast .quarter of
, Seciion 20. T.25.N., R.a.aE., W.M., Spokane County. Washingtot, bei.ag more par,ticularly
describeii as follows:
Begirmi,ng on the South r~igbt of :way line of Sprague Avenue at the -Northwest corner o,f Lot
'"B" of Short. Plat No. SP-1019-95 recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85,
Spoka.ne County, Washington: thence S.02630'34"E., along_ the West line,of said Lot "B",
160.09 feet to the Southwest coriner of said Lot "B",; thence N.87°09'35"E., along the South
line of said L-ot "B", 126.56 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot "B" and the West right of
-way. line of'Uo.iversity Road; thence 5.02°30'34"E., along said West right, of aray, line, 559.62-
feet to the centerline, of proposed 2nd Avenue; thence S.84°45"03"W., along the proposed
center-line of-2ad Avenue, 203.74 feet to clie begin.n.ing of a.curve to the left the radius of
which bears S.OS° 14'S?"E., a distance of 700.00 feet; 'thence4long said proposed centerline
and curve to the left_, through a central a:ngle,of 16°,15'OS", aa arc distance of 198.56 feet to
a point,of tangency; thence.5.68" 29'55"W.,, along said proposed centerline, 393.88 -feet to the
.beginning of a curve to the right the radius of aihich .bears N.21 °30'O5"W.. a distance of
700:00'feet; thence along said proposed centerl ine and curve to the right,, through a cenual
angle of 1,8 °39'41", an arc , di9tance of 227.99 feet to a poinc of tangency; cheace
S:87009'36"W., along said proposed centerline. 646.08 feet to the beginning, of a curve to the
right the radius, of which bears N.02050'24"W. ,,a distance of 1000.00 feet; thence along sa.id
proposed ceflterfiAe and curve to the right, tbrough a. central angle of I5°51'287, an arc
distance 276.77 feet to a point of tangency.; thence N.76°58'56"W., along said proposed.
centerli.ne, 339.14 feet, to the projected East right of way 'li.ne. of Walnut Road:, thence
N.02°30'34"W., -along said East rlght of way line, 596.55 feet .to the South line of the North
200.00 'feet of Tracts _224 and 223 of said Plat of Opportunity; thence N.87009'35 "E.,, along
said South line,, 503.80 feet to the West right of way line of Dartmouth Road; thence
N.02°30'34"W. 0 along said West right of way l-ine, 20.0.00 feet to the South righc of way iin.e
of Sprague Avenue; thence N.87-°09'35"E,, along said South right of way line, 1610.04 feec
to the Point of Beginn.ing.
Area =41.51 Acres,
- Q~ L
,
RIVA 10-3-9~
,
. ' 1
J ~~6
Q97
, BSr%
and, ZE
~Mp
VicinitY ~
-9L. :
. : ~ ~j 3~3 • 34
31 • 32
36 _ _ ~ - • • _ - ,
_ _ • ; *
cvo
. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . - • _
:s:::: 41 ~ 06 05= .
: ~u~~!~':::: , _ •
J........'~►~::: . '.~k+i-.~..~ : ; - ' ~ - -
' • :•t;:;'.: . . . . . . . . . . . . •
L►VL'J.~; . r ~ .
•:fi: ::r : . . : . : i: : ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~:•i. i ^ . i.'t: ~
27 :
~
~~1c: 1N
1'Y1LD
- ~ • - ~ 'NE
: : : Q - Zoo , ~ O f
~ . - ~ . . . _
12 . , i
• •!ti
M1 l OfY
; - - , ~'JI~K
~ . ~•v: ~:c~ ~ .
} . . : •.Y. J ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 119
ti•. ~ .V IS
:
18 BROOpYVAY- . =
17
tex-
.
~ N ~RS' ~~TA7~~~
FaRCRouNOS ~ SPRAC4
PQKANE. lNDIA 5 X-
~
015HMAH • ~ 2C1' . . . ~1 ~ >
N1t,i.5 ~ . ~
' ~.:rw~~= 0~ p ~,.5~
: . 19
:N A2
~
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..G ~ ~
~ . . . . . • ; , o P
25 : 30 2s ~~•s
26 PARX
: . : . _ • :
PAlNTEA 34 ,
3~ ; 32 Hi :
, • • • ~ -
36
.04
. ~
: : .
~ ' -
VIC1NiTY MAP
N'
~02112i~a
Not to Scale
~
• :
e'VILQl1lJ.~Se.T~rGTIflK' P~!1l'I~~Q ~ATIQ~(I ~TA ~e~0~ F
!'.B2SCcLA . ~
uur•Adfr un rest uay~,~n un vrcsr n., n..w.a:n' «wa. rm~v,o
.tnOlt►JA*yrlMwav K - i LWMWtl W
'VWUfvwtioeti70iGt11rwwneR flt
ri10'~0'.C17 w.117f1 nI 01 240w al. 101, ftkir v .v~v.~. . um . wc• ao rn to.eu+~ u nr~ ~,W n~.r ~ noriev wr .w ~
MMDrQ'.[DNAbMitGfMl~! ~i 1o$KwwucwSr. L'oo.0, ~6Aao. . I.Y¢MI. ~ w•~w~t
~~f• ro~~ruw«t~~. ~p~o.n •Yt0_. ~p ~'ItU~M-40I.~LMA1MM104 Mt 1.=WItiO~O+~~W W70.1
MU0►p'.CO/M174Nttwb!0 onwa.wwar4mm,
rACyOStD PAD f lO00'.l. n~l ~iw yir. Ww+r.n~.~..i
~.11ipGY1.MiM 1pp tl~l
~MMlDM/IDA Wftifw/~ ~ ...i ~O hMt01 tdYRAw '
ovLNSlrr C11r ~ Ir~oN r~a au '
iOtAL,0ui0n~ ~ u 1~000 ~ 1. o r.~a fr.[u au
- - • > wr~.tu^$e it.a3 :d 'uav. ro rotonnw+ Avuo.~•.:~o..ew a~M..i.rV' `
uLA.
nvcnwn con 1=wrKa,~,~ uia'.i. 0.~w ~ b o euae x~e.w I ~ wwexsm a~
' AO~OD[D WSwW 01:~ ~1. w~n UuAr ra1r uua.~, oed,40.1%i ~cs~r..ov
CiulT: KCTAtL 4K I7~~6 ~ 1~ Ltlr. r.w.i uuiua
7i7p ~ ~
645T. M:fN6 ~0 1. b~~a rr~~ w~tn+a► ~eo
lK631;1ttA0.*I4'
CM6t. FblAOq qETA4 q i00500 ~ 1,
CRfl/.'PNJD,IKCtNLaJ iOiA?0o 1.
I cYIDT.1'41L A 0D'J1~0 1. ' F~{ o rst
CA~~. e e,~..,
e,~r~ wv.~ c ,N, . 0, ~ .
:.~,;~IVED ~
LiU9t. WKL 0 I~J01 eamaeara O~IIIII~IIIIIIII~IIIIIIIO ' 1 'J~AOL~ ~YG ~ .1.
CKI>f: MkL C ~ ~ ^ n !A ~1 ' t~ 1-~-~/
cRror.wur ~I.~~.~ mo'I 6i,~.+'~!~'1~~~C VOU,I~! 1 T ~
e,nr,►.vx• o.~GO.r' 0 111111111111111 UI I I I I I 10 ' narame~u
cNar: wu r >.,o,~ • .
'.tl.p0 AVC, f ~
; 640:,~ Iw►,~lluuu~u~► imu- 11998
ea" JAH 0
rx~.o~.eD ►w e .iao,,,. ~ •
"uw.v-,w~.F'^D~ o.ro;i. 11 P I' B 11 L B V ,y'I. '1't,1 Pi C► I W1; I' 1, d 11 1' I 1: I~n~!'l; YA1 A P f
IOlN6 Ou1l0016 M12A '427.373 a/. _ 'JLKC. NplC ~
r~,~„•„~,~ - ~ A% %.,1Q-RI1ILD1Nfj A ,1D P1ANNING ~
•1' .k^ ' - a
~ ~ : t *~►,-.-~,~y~ ` ' ~ # 1:~ Ef ~
t-., ~1 = En
llPlfliMt
, I ~ • . ,
„ • . ~
~ '~,w;9t.. ::.~t.~.:" • RfiR111 - ~ ~ ,'1 ~ t.MJL'Y::.t~a,
' ►~~r~ ' 1 ~ ~ i \ ~ ~ (
1111" I ~ ~ : ~ ~ "f`~~~1~ Y l~ _~I~_.e_~• 4'N '~I~
•1111
"III1 a
~~~~~~~~~n~~ , - ~
I ~ • • ~G 7 a 4
. . . i ~
o
x
~ _ •~.i . ~y r ~~1.1' ~ i.~~• e. ' w.. i ,1 1~ I rn. ~ RrV~ Y~
1i ''MYf1 • ~ MP . ~wOl/ . , I , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ,~"~w, . lllllil~ul~~I~~~IIU Q~ ..N.,; " ~ . ~ ~
nw ~~aw ~ !r Wr~ L~Q~~ ) ~
M,.. • _ •e--~ • , ' 'IIIIIIIIWIIIIIIIIO~~ ~ ...,~~.,,I w • tC , t % ' , .i. '
"w.4. ~ ~ :~wLr~'"~...w IrA i
wr...w u~.. ~~III~IIIIIIIIIIIIIlO "'r '14' iYLt ~ n1~a~ L ~ r:r 'l'~HQ`M YI J
k ; ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ • . 4-. Ytl~.Ll~l~ ~ ,A ~ 7
' '~SY~ iC` a~f. ~_I w.►wwr. ~.,~=-~.n„~. ',\''1•'',~ .Y• ~
Y lwRillil~n•
~ ~ - _ 'r ~ ~ _ ys..1 L
. . .r ~ . ~ p ~ 1~ .~mW~~~~..~~~J..~ 111~~• 1~.J y~ ~ ~ •rwM~~~wu ~
. . ~.1,~~~ - • ' • - ~ • ~ • _ - ~~°P:.~ ~ ' m. . ~
luuuuanl. ~01
` MI'~ ~ aAr - C-. ~ =~~u - - _u~ - ~ _ ~ _ ~N_' ~ ~ ~ ~ , NS ~ ~~{t~._y ~:i~,~A / Z,µ1 Y
' ' _
, KL ~ •',T •...+5~ r ~
, _ ~\y~• ~+{r~'1.."-~~ i: y~: ( - _ - • ~ ' ~
~;~~,.a; , u~1(I 111 "c~,,.. WIIGI!!1
r~~{Ifll 1` ~'~1 - ~ 1~ ~ r' 11' Ir~w~~~ .~~QZ.. ~ J,• • i ~ r l• I
'1 ~ ' v~~ • ~~II , '~{IG • '~ao~~I . ,r ' +
~"~~;1~, a~ UTAUlU1UpII111~UllI~QIllUllL ~ ~ ~ ' &vV.A
\ 1 ` „ 1 . ' ~ • ,{l= : •t ~ 1~ ~b wM 1 I
I'• ~ ~i • , ' i ~ i I li.~~~«r~'1[
\ ~ 1..
YYW v ' 1 I• .~i ~~r'~.~r.~.Y.Y~ J 4'Y ..ti- 1nuc r= ` ~,I 1~1 •1~~s
r . • _ . _ ~.,,,"r' - I 11 L4•_ .
T~r1or lu~tneerla~. Ine. ~ ' Z tntnas ~ trulamctaa~ ~ wr~
yyu•.u
ID DLL fi
Ir~ w~u~~ r11 ~w) /Y~WI li I . I 4' •~-0.
NIC"S
~ OQ' I r•
~c.e l~ ll l~, 1, I ~ll~( i1 rl
:zKe. r.Q,wqr
eeo~
fI IW W W 1 a~ 1
~ •
• ` -
ZEml8A=89
. ; rA
Aft
, L ~ BOONE,
`q
Z • ' J
Q t ~ ~ i.J vBeMa~
. • LL a ~
J
~ L a ~
Q OESOgT ~ .
~
c
z
~ I EL . A Q' a
• 2 /_D ~R d~lY 3 i
` ~ , f:
Q-
• ' • i LK I LK 1 ~ ~
p, ~
U ? ' 1
a o Q Q 4
Q -j O O 4 p +
0 0 s~~+~:~°•~=°p~~ dt
~ WAY
NI XON v
waiN ~ F a+ ~ N s AvE
p Vr.
~ ~ J Q RIvEaSt0 ~
e ~
2 w FirB • ~
Z tartian A Ft.
~
~~:~ty~ R D N - '
1 • ~ o; ,
L~: ::;:;;:::;:;;;;~;::•:6~~'0 ~"~~•Y~'~ M/LWAUKE£ RA/Cf
, - > . ~:s~:f~::'t.::~:~~.~ :~:a~: _ _ . -
~ ' ~V 6. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ • w ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ •
T+1 AvE.
T AV E
u
lx
w
i,,; t h '
' • rIU ~ ~ -
' G' OC tA " e > 7.TM =
` C Q h tt
g
`EIGM ~ AvE ~ 8TH
. ; ~ '
• a RCJrEAr , . . - ~ 9 T M
Avf.
. 10 IC
Z z- • ~ -
' o /01A AYE
• k:~•• ,Z
IML
s ~ : :•r••~ i •
~-H .
. •°'•r=:: ~ ~ J
o a~ C\ .z r•a 6 ~ 6
1
- -
rr Aet: wa-IIL-" i►=o - - - _ c
~ ~ , St u"~r-+~e~oY u~_=~o a`t~~~~~jf~r'
4
~ - _
~ I ~I •~~•••••LL•L•••L'LLL~~LL~Lt~
~A- r r!~Vrti ~ ~ti~ ~
/ i
~ ~
Fs
~ ~ I.u 11■
ntI',' \ t ~
WEE
g~ ~ ` _ ~ • ,
!
•MA
C) % MPM "I • ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~§~~§~~5~~~~~
~ a ~ ` s.. ~ ~ EtUYti~" Z~3S~ViCTG=SJOJO0&04~
•QEIIIIIlt~110 ~
y. ~ -
_ - ~i~ , . ~
~ • ~O~If~i 8~ ~i!~ -
oooo-__oo_o;_ooAo.+ooe ~
~ . a
'~283:888~46o',5aU~~!i~8
0w 1~H e • ~~1 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~a~,~,
~ ~ ' UlfifHf~N a a: e
~ \ l ~ E ~ ~ (E}}}{}}{~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ oHiM~•~
,
9 ~
2 -
~ ~ ► ~ ~ ~ ~~;~~~~i -
~
_ ~ - ~ I ~I_ C-A•£ri~-~ R 0~.~
g a
0
Y
.
a g ' ~ ~ fl ~ II M ~ ~ upervense-nr crrv _ ~ '
e~~DOvELoPiwEe~e-~- -t~rmvnnY un~mnva srrs Pr.nN ~ •
KnPue.-w^ 99200 1
1
M E AMI O R A Itl D U Idl
DATE: Apnl 16, 1998
TO: Louis Webster, Division of Building and Plarinin'g
FROM: Br~nda~Sims a.nd Katherine Nfiller;,Stormwater U,tility►
Bill Hemmings, Developmeni Services
RE: ZE-18A-98, Chang-e of Gonditions; University City
CC: FILE
The proposed area covers approximately'50 acres within-'the AqUifer Sensitive-Area. This a
relatively la(ge, area in -an -environment known to .produce-low'quality runoff due to the ;often
heavy traffic in parking lots and the subsequent build up of-pollut_ants between storm events.
Eve ryopportunity needs to be taken1 to, reduce the,amount -of runoff directly injected to the.
Aquifer'from sites like this. A site this size with a 90% impervious area coverage would require
aboutJour acres of infiltration, area for treating stormwater. At, this coverage there is more 'that
enough open space to, treat all of,the runoff from the site. Using, some innovative design an
even higher coverage could be obtained while~-still infiltrating -all of the r.unoff. per ;the County
-design criteria.
We -r,ecommend 1) denial pf the proposed additions to the1anguage relating to "208"
requirements (CONDITIONS OR C,ONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL-page2,
#8). 2) To the extent that is practical, existing hard surface areas will need to',drain -to' grassed
-percolation area (GPA) swales.
,
C:1W1ND0 W SITEMPIze 18a89b.dcz
4 1
• ~
V• wJKA,i l.L/ L1lU1 • a .R HEARING JJXAMI1\ ER
RE_ Cliar~ge of Conditions in the Ex.isting } FINATNGS UF FACT,
RegioiiaI Bussness (13-3) Zone ) CUNCY,USIONS A.ND
Applicant Uriiversity C:ty, Inc. ) DECISI4N
FileNo. ZE-1 8A-89 )
1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECIS~ON
proposai: AppIicatian fvr a chan~e otcondi#avas in ~the existing Regianal Business (B-3)
zane, ta deiete and modify the canditions irnpased an a previous zaDe reclassification, change, of
conditions and wariance in Building and Plannit~g Division Tile Nvs. ZE-18-891ZES0A-87IVE-
38-89, re~az~ciing si~te plax~, landscaping, drainage, signage, par~sing ]at and right ofway
requiremertfs. -
Deczsioa: ApprvvaI of the application in partr an.d denial of the applicatiaa in part.
II. FINDINGS OF FA►CT AND CUNCLUSIOlYS
The Hearing Exami.ner has reviewed the cbange of con.ditians apPlicafian snerthe
evidence of recard, at3d hereby adopts the following f ndings of fact and conclusions:
A. GENERt.t4.L . .~t FORMATION:
Applicant/Agent: Gary Bern~.rda, Bernardo-Wi1~s Archi#ects, 107 Sou#h ~award, Suite 420,
Spakane, WA 99204
Lega! Osvner: Universily City, Inc., cJv Goadaie &Barbien- C+ompany, 201 West Norfih
River Drive, Spokane WA 99201; and c/o, H. James Ma.gnuson, 816 Sherrnan A,venue, P. O,
Box 22882 Caeur d'Alene, LU 8351+6-2288
LaUtian: Generally Iflcated south of and adjacent tu Sprague Avenue, west of and adjaceat
fio TJmiversity Raad in Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 EW3.VI= Spakane County,
Washington.
Le;al Descriptiou: That partion ofShart Plat No. SP--1419-95 and that portian of the Flat of
Capportuaity, a.s per Ptat recorded in Valume "K" of Plats, Page 2Q# 21, 22 aud 23 in the
Noxtheast quarter of Section 20, Tawnship 25 N.,Range 44 EWI, Spokane Caunty,
Washingtan, being rnare particularIy described as €`ollows:
Beginzxing on the Sauth right of way line of Sprague Avenue at the Northwest corner of Lot
4zB" of Short Plat No. SP-10 19-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages $4 and 85, Spokane
Counfiy, Washington; thence S. 02° 30° 34" E., alang the Wesi linc ofsaid Lot "B„, 160.09 feet
ta the Sauthvvesi comer ofsaid Lo# "g,,, thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., atang the Svuth lirie of'said
Lot `°B126.56 feeE to the Southeast corner of said Lot;'B'' and the West righz ofway line of
HE Fiiidin;s, Canclusic~ns arid Decisian TE-I SA,-S9 Pa~e I
Universicy IZoad; t(tence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along said West right of tvay line, 559.62 fect to the
cenierline of proposed 2"d Avenue; thence S. 84° 45' 03" W., alnng the proposed centerline of
2"d Avenue, 243.74 feet to the beginning of a curve to the teft the radius of which bears S. 05°
14' 57" E., a distance of 700.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the Ieft,
through a central angle of 16° 15' 08", an arc distance of 195.56 feet lo a poinl of tangeney;
thence S. GS° 29' 55" W., along said proposed centerline, 393.88 feet to the beginnincr of a curve
to tllc right the radius of which bears N. 21° 30' OS" W., a distance of 700.00 feet; tlience along
said proposed centerline and curve to the ri~ht, through a central angle of 18° 39' 41, an arc
distance of 227.99 feet to a point of tangency; tbence S. 87° 09' 36" W., along said proposed
centertine, 646.08 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right the radius of which bears N. 02°
50' 24" W., a distance of 1000.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and curve to the
right, through a central angle of 15° 51' 28", an arc distance 276.77 feet to a point of tangency;
thence N. 760 58' 56" W., along said proposed centerline, 339.14 feet, to the projected East right
of way line of Walnut Road; thence N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said East right of way 1ine, 596.55
feet to the South line of the North 200.00 feet of Tracls 224 and 223 of said Plat of Opporiunity;
thence N. 370 09' 35" E., along said South line, 503.80 feet to the West righi of way line of
Dartmouth Road; thence N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said West right of way line, 200.00 feet to the
South right of way Iine of Sprague Avenue, thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., along said South right of
way line, 1610.04 feet to the Point of Beginning. -
Zoning: Regional8usiness (B-3) zone
-
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designateci in the Urban category and the
Major Commercial category of the Spokane County Generalizeri Comprehensive Plan. The site
is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area, Aquifer Sensitive Area, and the CTrban
Impact Area designated in the Comprehensive Plan.
Environmental REVietiv: A Deterimination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the
Division of Buiiding and Planning an March 9, 1998. -
Site Deseciption: The site is approxirnately 41.5 acres in size and is flat. The subject
property is developed with the University City Shopping Center, which currently has a gross
leaseable retail area of approxunately 428,685 square feeG This includes a covered mall with
390,000 square feet of gross leaseable area, and sateltite retail pads totaling 38,685 square feet of
gross leaseable area. The satellite retail pads include a tire store located near Sprague Avenue,
and a speciairy retail strip located west of Dartmouth Road, at some distance south of Sprague
Elvenue. The mall has a partial upper Ievel for parking in the middle. Most of the site is covered
with buiidings a.nd paved parking areas, along with some landscaping and some undeveloped
areas. Llndeveloped areas include land lying south of the covered mall and land lying along the
westerlv boundary of the site. A small amount of paved parking exists immediately south of the
paved access road thai runs behind the existing mall. See aerial photo submitted by applicant,
marked as exhibit E; and see description of site improvements in Traffic Impact Assessment
prepared by Taylor Engineering dated I-I5-98.
The shoppin~ center ~~~as initiatly constructed around 1960, with some modification to ihe site
improvements having taken place since that time. Compare site ptan dated 1-8-88 in File No.
ZE-50-S7 and Fiatire F2 in Traffic Impact Assessment dated 1-15-98 in File No. ZE-1$A-89. A
IIE Findines. Conclusions 1nd Decision ZE-l 8A-89 pacz 2
f ~
lwo-loi sliort piat was approved by the County in 1996 in File No. SP-95-96, which divided the
sliopping center property into the cucrent site and the 20,000 square foot Taco Bell property
whicli lies at the southwest corner of University Itoad and Sprague Avenue. Numerous tenants
Mave left the shopping center in recent years, influenced by the construction of a new regional
mall in the Valley area. 1`he old Rosauer's store building that previously existed at the east end
of the mall, along with part of the old Newbeny's store, is being demolished to make room for a
new and targer Rosauer's store.
Zoning History of Site: Between 1957-1961, most of the site was zoned for commercial
development under the now expired County Zoning Ordinance. In 1988, approximately six (6)
acres lying immediately south of the rrzall and north of a 100-fooE couaty right of way was added
to the site and rezoned to the B-3 zone, to provide additional parking. See Hearing Examiner
Committee (HEC) decision dated 3-3-88, staff report dated 3-3-88, and site plan dated 1-8-88 in
Buitding 3nd Planning File No. ZE-50-87. In 1989, the HEC approved a change of the
conditions to the rezone granted in File No. Z,E-50-87 for six (6) acres, rezoned the remainder of
the site to the B-33 zone, approved a variance to allow fewer parking spaces on the site than
required by the B-3 zone, and established conditions of approval for the entire property. See
HEG decision dated 8-25-89 and staff repart dated 8-24-89 in File Nos. ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87
and VE-38-89. The HEC's decision pernutted expansion and remadeling of the shopping
center, authorizinj 450,040 square feet of additional retail area, cinema an.d food court, along
with some new parking structure conszruction. The 1989 proposal contemplated a gross building
area of approximately 1,009,516 square feet and a gross leaseable area of 836,104 square feeL
See site plan dated 7-25-59 in such files. The HEC's decision required the appli-:.ant to submit a
``Master Development Plan" for site development, incorporating all conditions of approval and
illustrating compliance with the develogment standards of the B-3 zone. The 1989 proposal was
never pursued by the applicant.
Surrounding Conditions: The site is located along the south side of Sprague Avenue and
the east side of University Road, which roads are designated as Principal Arterials by the County
Arterfia! Road Plan. The Arterial Road Pian also illustrates a future Principal Arterial, Controlled
Aceess/High Capacity roadway along the south boundary of the site. 'I'he County Engineer has
adopted road plans to make such arterial a one-way couplet with Sprague Avenue, to be known
as the "Valley Couplet". Walnut Road, which was located aloag the west boundary of the site at
the time of the 1989 redevelopment proposal, has been vacated. Except to the south, the land
adjacent to the site or adjacent to the site across public roads is developed with commercial uses
on land zoned B-3. A large Spokane Transit Autl~ority bus transfer facility is located south of
the site, at the northwest corner of University Road and Fourth Avenue. Resideatial uses and
vacant land are found in the area Iying south of the site and the south leg of the proposed Valley
Cvuplei, on land zoned UR-3.5, UR-22 or B-3• Sprague Avenue represents a major traffic and
commercial corridor throu3h the Spokane Valley area of the county. A new regionat shopping
mall tivas recenily constructed a number of cniles northeast of the site, alono the north side of
Interstate 90 west of Sullivan Road.
Project Description: The applicant seeks a change of canditions in the B-3 zone, to delete
and/or modify certain conditions of approval imposed in File Nos. ZE-15-89/ZE-50A-87NE-38-
$9 relating primarily ta site plan, landscaping, signage, drainage, parking lot and right of way
requirements. The applicant's proposed changes are set forth in Attachment #l to the change of
conditioiis application, and in Exhibits C-D submitted at the public hearing. The site p}an of
HE Findicigs. Conclusiotis and Decision ZE-1 SA-89 Paue 3
.
1 •
record submitted 1-1-9$ illustrates existing and futurc building pads for the shnpping center. A
iiew Itasauer's store is plaitned at the east end of the mall. The site plan illustrates the creation of
a new five (5) acre parcel that would include the Rosauer's store and its associated parking area
to the north. Preliminary binding site plan approval has been granted to a two-lot binding site
plan to divide the site, in File No. BSP-56-97. The 1-1-98 siie plan indicates that the area lying
between the new Rosauer's storc and tlie old Penny's store (Major Retailer #2 building) would
be removed from Ehe existing enclosed mall. Also see testimony of Gary Bernardo. The old
Rosauer's store and selected portions of the enclosed mall will be demolished. See
Environmental Checklist, p. 2, answer to question # 11.
Three major retail pads and two smaller commercial pads are proposed for the area of the site
lying west of Dartmouih Road, replacing the existing retail improvements. East ofDartmouth
Road, the site plan shows three new, small commercial pads along the north boundary of the site,
and three new, small commercial pads along the southerly border of the property. Several new
points of egress are illusrrated to the south leg of the proposed Valtey Couplet ("Second
Avenue"). The site plan also illustrates the proposed vacation of Dartmouth Road and its
revision to a private drive. The 1-1-98 site pIan of record lists the total building area for the
proposal as 506,373 square feet, with either 2,383 or 2,388 pazking spaces proposed. The
applicant proposes to redevelop the site an phases over several years, starting with the new
Rosauer's store, then adding the satellite retail pads along the north side of Sprague Avenue, and
thereafter adding the other proposed improvements contingent on construction of the proposed
Valley Couplet. See Traffic Impact Assessment dated 1-15-98.
_
. B. PRQCEDURAL INFORMATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.504.040, and
Zon.ing Code Chapters 14.628, 14.802, 14.804 and 14.806
Hearing Date and Location: April 29, 1998, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: April 13, 1998 by applicant
Posted: April 15, 1998 by applicant
Published: Aprii 10, 1998
Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met.
Site Visit: June 12, 1998
Hearing Procedure: Pursuani to Resolution Nos. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure)
Testiniony:
Louis Webster and John Pederson Scott Engelhard
Division of Buildin; and Plannina Division of Engineering and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-07-40 Spokane, WA 99260
HE FindinQs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Pa~e 4
. • ~
Larry Hacberholz Gary Bernardo
S 17 North Stevenson Court 107 South Howard
Liberty Lake, W A Spokane, WA 99204
TJavid Peterson
2619 Soutli Baiir►en Court
Veradale, WA 99037
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Pian, Spokane County Zoning Code,
Spokane Counry Code, and Spokane County Resolution I3o. 96-0171 and 96-0294. The record
includes Building and Planning File Nos. ZE-18A-89, ZE-18-89, ZE-50A-87 and VE-38-89.
C. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS ANALYSIS:
Spokane County Zoning Eode 14.504.040 requires that applications for signifieant changes
to the approved site development plans for zone changes be approved by the Hearing Body
followi,ng a public hearing. Tlae Couirty Hearing Examiner Ordinance provides some guidance
for consideration of a change of conditions application. Generally, a change of eondiiions may
be approved if it 1) will not be detrimental io the public health, safety and genetal welfare, 2)
complies with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and 3} comglies with the Spokane
County Zoning Code and other applicable land use regulations. The Hearing Examiner may
consider the Spokane County Generalized Compreheasive Plan, the Spokane County Zoning
Code, SEPA, ihe County's Local Environmental Ordi.nance, and other applicable land use
regulations in making such determ.inations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Section 11.
The Hearing Examiner may impose conditions on the applicatian to protect the public health,
safety and general welfare, or to mitigate environmental impacts. A change of conditions is not a
rezone because it does not change the actual zone af the property; although it may affect the
permitted uses, location of buildings, landscaping, cond.itions of approval and other features in a
site development plan that were approved ia conjunction with a prior re2one.
The applicant seeks to delete or modify the conditions of approval and the site development
plan approved in conjunction with the zoning actions taken by the Spoka.ne County Hearing
Examiner Committee (HEC) in its decision dated August 25, 1989. The applicant's request for
change of conditions is reflected in Attachment #1 to the applieation, and in Exhibits C and D
submitted at the public hearing. The StaffReport on pages 4-5 contains a general analysis of the
Comprehensive P!an policies applicable to the change of conditions, whicb analysis the
Examiner adopts herein. There was no public opposition to the project, although County staff
and public agencies objected to a number of the proposed changes.
1. Park-in2 variance condition
The applicant requested deletion of HEC condition #2, reiating to the parking variance
approved in File No. VE-38-39. The applicant proposes to comply with the parkiag
requirements of the B-3 zone, which the applicant indicates will require a minimum of 2,382
parking spaces. See F-xhibit D. The Division of Building and Planning is not able to verify the
required number of parkina spaces because the site plan oFrecord dated 1-1-98 does not cpntain
enough spzcific inforniation on the proposed uses to allow County staff to allow such
HE Findin@s, Conelusit-ins and Uecision ZE-18A-E9 Page 5
veri ('icatian. See Staff Report, p. S. However, such deternlination can bc madc prior to ihe
issuance of a building pcrmit. It is noted that the July 25, 1989 site plan submitted for File No.
ZE-18-89 woulrJ have required approximalely 4,180 parking spaces for the redevelopment plan
proposed in 19S9, based on HEC condition #2 and the gross leaseable area of such proposal
indicated ocl such site plan. New multi-level parking structures were proposed to accommoda#e
such parkiilg in the 1989 plan.
2. Landscanine conditions
The applicant requested deletion or revision of a number of the conditioas relating to
landscaping which were imposed by the HEC on the 1989 redevelopment proposa4. See Exhibit
D. The applicant requested deletion of HEC conditian #5, which condition required the
incorporation of certain aesthetic concepts described by the applicant at the August 24,1989
public hearing for the 1989 redevelopment proposal, into a required "Master Development P1an".
Such aesthetic coneepts included "additional landscaping adjacent to all buildings, special
landscaping treatments adjacent to major entrances to the buildings and parking lots/structures
which shall comply with fire and traffic requirements". The applicant also requested revision of
HEC condition #8, to lirrut compliance with the landscaping requirements of the Zoning Code to
the newly developed areas of the site instead of the entire site. The applicant fucther requested
deletion of HEC condition #93, which required that special landscaping features be provided '
"every 200 feet and at each public entrance to the buiiding", which features were to be "at least
150 square feet in area or as approvEd by the Planning Director". These are apparentiy the same
features referenced in HEC condition #5.
County staff requested that the entire site be required to comply with the landscaping
standards applicable to the site under the Zoning Code, but did not oppose deletion of the special
landscaping standards imposed by HEC conditions #5 and #9. See StaffReport, p. 6; te,stimony
of Louis Websier and John Pederson; and letter dated 7-8-97 from Stacy Bjordah] to Gazy
Bernardo. The site plan dated 1-1-98 illustrates special landscaping at the various mall entrances
to the site, which landscaping is not an issue. The site plan alsa illustrates five (S) feet of Type
III landscaping along the borders of ihe site with adjacent public rights of way, as required by
Zoning Code 14.806.440 (2)(c). This perimeter landscaping is also not at issue. Zoning Code
14.802.220 imposes various landscaping requirements on parlang areas associated with land
development. It is these landscaping requirements wluch ihe applicant wants to limit to newly
developed areas of the site, and which County staff requests be applied to the entire site.
Zoning Code Chapier 14.802 establishes parking area requirements for the various types of
uses conterttplated by the Zoning Code. Zoning Code 14.802.220 requires the installation of
specific landscaping features in the parking areas developed on a site. Zoning Code 14.802.220
(5) generally requires that at least 10% of the parking area on a site be devoted to landscaping;
that the Iandscaped areas be at leasz 32 square feet in size; that all parking sialls be located no
more than 60 feet from a landscaped area, unless a more effective landscaping alternative
approved b}- the Division of Building and Planning is devised to such specification; and that all
landscapine be located between parking stalis, at the end of park-ina columns, or between stalls
and the property line.
In concludina, that the landscaping requirements of the Zoning Code should be applied to
the entirz sitz, County staff cited Zoning Code 14.806.020, which provides as follov.•s:
HF Findil!es. Conclusions and Decision 'LE-18A-89 Paoe 6
i
1 4. 8OG. D?0 Apnlic.alia:
1. The Pluiriiing Depurtmeni sliall review arrd nray approve tivitli
tiloclificaliores, or disapprove site landscape development plans jor a11
tteva developmetrts in ticcorcltrnce witji the provisiaris oJtlris sectio,i.
Tlie Department »iaypernrit alternative landscaping (as set forth in
.SeC110I1 14.806.080) when the overall site landscape development plnn,
ns p,-oposed by iIre applicant, provicles as good or betier results than
reqriired by iItis sectJOn:
Developments itivolving additions or alterations to existing stnectctres
i» which the cost of the additions or alterations exceeds~fty percent
(SO o) oJthe value of tlie existirrg strrccture(s) or improvements (vallce
s1ra11 be determined frorrr official Cocinty records) shQ118e subject to
tlre provisiorts of this section,- provia►ed lhat where existirlg structures
or i»tprovernents are situated so as to preclude installation ojrequired
IQIldSClIpIllg, such required landscaping mcry be wQived by tlre
Platrning Director.
See Staff Report, p. 6, arYd testimony of John Pederson. Zoning Code 14.806.040 establishes
requirements for perinzeter Iandscaping, depending on the zoning of the subjeci property and
sutrounding properties and other factors. Conshuing Zoning Code Chapters 14.806 and 14.802
together, it is apparent that Zoning Code 14.806.020 (2) only applies to the perimeter
landscaping requirements set forth in Zoning Code Chapter 14.806, aad does not apply to the
Iandscaping requirernents imposed on parking areas under Zoning Code 14.802.220.
The applicability of tbe landscaping standards set forth in Zoning Code 14.802.220 is
controlled by Zoning Code 14.802.020, which provides as follows, in pertinent part:
Anv chanve to a buildin~ or anv chanQe in use o1'a building or site to
sucli an extent that a permit or Certificale of Occupctncv is necessurv,
s1ia11 renuire compliance with the provisions contained herein. All
requif•ed parking arevs shall be made permanenrly available free of
clrarge to the customers of the icse on the site and ncaintained for parkrng
purpose.r o»ly. No building permit shall be issued until plans showing
provision for tlre requlred oJf-street parking have been submitted and
approved. Every !ot or pcrrcel of larrd or portion thereof used as a public
or private parking sjia!l be developQd arrd maintained in uccordanee with
tlris sectloit
[Emphasis added]. Building permit and certificate of occupancy requirements are set fotth in
Chapter 3.03 of the Spokane County Code (SCC), and in portions of the Uniform Building Code
(LJBC) adopted under Chapter 3.41 of the UBC. SCC 3.03.020 states, pursuant to UBC 109.13%
that a btiilding permit is required from the County to erect, construct, enlarge, aYter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert, demolish, use or occupy any building or structure...", except
for eertain minor exceptions listed under [JBG 106.2.
HE Findings, Caiiclusic.ns and necision LE-I8A-89 paJe 7
, .
SCC 3.03.021 (c) requires a"change in use" permit for all occupancy or use changes, in
oi•der to determine whetlier a new use will be impacted by various codes or ardinances in effect.
UBC 109.1 requires the issuance ot' a certificate of occupancy before any building or siructure is
oecupied or used, and before any change in the existing occupancy classification of a buildincy or
structui-e or portion thereof. This requirement does not apply to "Group R, Division 3"
(residential) oecupancies, or to "Group'1VI" (merdWde) occupancies. Group M occupancies
include occupancies used for the sale and display of inerchandise, and involving the stocks of
goods, wares or merchandise incidental to such purpose and accessible to the public. This
includes such uses as department stores, drug st'ores, shopping centers, and wholesale and retail
stores. See UBC 309.1. 1
UBC 109.2 and 3405 require the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for changes in the
character of occupancy or use of a building which would place the building in a different division
of the same graup of occupancy or in a different group of occupancies. It is not clear to the
Examiner whether the exception to the certificate of occupancy requirement listed in UBC 109.1,
applicable to residential and mercantile occupations, applies to the requirements stated in UBC
109.2 and 3405. However, SCC 3.03.021(c) provides that, in addition to the requirements of
tJBC 3405, a certificate of occupancy may be required when the occupancy or use changes
to the extent that different zoning or other county code requirements such as, but not limited to
parking standards, ASA Overlay Z-0ne requirements, 208 requirements, etc., apply."
The site development plan dated 1-1-98 and the applicant's description of the proposal
indicate that significant portions of +e existing shopping center will be remodeled or removed,
and new buildings and uses constructed or located on the site. Many of such development
activities wauld require the issuance of a building permit under the above-stated provisions of the
County Code and the UBC. A certificate of occupancy may be required for some of these
activities or other changes planned for the site.
The applicant indicated that it was willing to comply with the landscaping requirements of
the Zoning Code only in the "newly developed areas" of the site, including the area of the site
lying west of Dartmouth Road and the area lying south of the existing shopping center. This
would not include the existing parking areas located north of the existing mall, the parking lot for
the new Rosauer's sEore, or the parking area lying between the existing mall (old Lamont's store)
and Dartmouih Road. This excluded area represenis about 50 % of the site. See testimony of
Gary Bernardo, and aerial photo marked as Exhibit E. The applicant's resistance to Iandscaping
the entire site is based on the cost and inconvenience associated with tearing up the exisiing
paving in these areas and installing new landscaping, and possibly the lass of some parking
spaces. However, Zonin? Code 14.$02.020 appears to require that all parking areas associated
with a building or use on the site which is being changed in use or structure, which change
requires the issuance of either a building permit or a certificate of occupancy from the County,
mnst be brought into compliance with tbe parkina landscaping standards of Zonin; Code
14.802.220. Since the applicant did not request a variance from these standards, the Examiner
has no potver to waive the landscaping requirements.
The precise application of the landscaping requirements of Zoning Code 14.$02120 to site
development cannot be dztermined by the Examiner, since it depends on whether a building
pennit or ceRiftcate of occupancy is needed for particuiar changes in buildings and uses on the
site. The determination is also made diFf cuit by the fact that many buildings on ihe site are
HE Findin,s. Corlclustons and Decision ZE-18A-89 Pa~e 8
6 a~Ed Gg-dg ~_~Z uotsc~aQ pue suoisnl~uo~ `s0tiipul.J 9H
•spiEpurls awouiuip ,,SOZ„
joaCqns atli qlloj las qc)Tqnn `jaacuagEUeW la)LvMU.uols joj sautjapcng„ paldopE s,Aiuno:) acll cpinn
aouErldtuoz) sapnjmn styZ •suoqoE asn pcml,}o sWl snouMn loj spxepuels yons tpcn% aourtcvojcrm
ut sueid 29eueElpjo tEnoldd8 pQe Wucacqns ac{i salinbat puE splEpueis agEUreip sat4sijqulsa apoo
f4unoDaqjjo 'VI•6.mjdEqa •apoof4unoo2tpjo t,i•6laldeyDlapun pagipo3a-muoi
.Injosai qons
ui suotstnoid aoEUreip ay1, •86b0-56 PEm 9ZL0-18 'SaI1 uopiosa-a 14umoo Aq papaaum uaaq sEy
Z691-08 'om uoqniosa-6 AlunoD jEyj sa;orr Jacnwexa aqZ 769I-08 'oNT uoclnjosaa AivnoZ) ao
paseq `pascnai aq loa uopcpuo:) t{ons MM spuaunuo=L-9 saged uo uodali jjeiS ay,L •21is aatlua
a'Dio pEaistn ai!s aipjo seaie padojanap AInnau arp ol spnpums aSEUm.p «gpZ„ tp!An 23ueq.tiaro3
Irtuij ol 69# uoilipuoo juau=da(I guTweid Fue 8# uoqipno~ OgHjo crocscnai palsanbal lveotjdde
aq.L *Q liqRxg aaS 'IESOdoid luat.udolanaPw 6861010 J03 aSecr-ImP ..80Z„ 3o vo!IBjjR)su.'
atil 01 Strqe1ai saotirpuo~ OgH um
iao jo aoisu►as io IIorlajap palsanbai itreotlddE atLI,
sluauianmvai aaEUMp «30Z„ ' E
•smauuarmba.i
Rutdeospuet ioj (IcmOas aimbai oi suoTSrnoid asaqp iapun Aiu01prne slTJo noiscnr(j alq1
sanudap uoqaiap palsanbai sjumoRdde aql aitqns `saoismasd asaql tptnn ivai,stsaoo st uoTatpuo:)
atp ol uocswi Baiuueid PuE satpimqjo QoIscM(I ay,~, ',,1atu an uiaiaq sluauiaimbai otnduospuei
atPioqi amsaa oilueoqddeue jo pwmbai aq xent ktmoas ratpo pum. nUipLIOCI lEqlSolgls
0 t) OZZ'Z08'bt aPo~ ftruoZ -,tsuoqeot~taads pu¢ suejd paAOiddE aqa ol gmpioooE `seaS auo
I03 pac~reIutetu pue paiimsat aq ntnn ~atdeaspuel 1Eq3 alnsaa oi lipasojo iaual otnpntoin `~un~as
alEUdoidd8 ia~o io spnoq aouEUUO,~ad aunba~r ~Ceui luawq.redaQ gutuueid ~cP l~l~salE)s (Z)
OZ t'908'b t ap05 OtnuoZ •puoq aouEauojjad aqjlo,j paln;psqns aq oa «aa)u~mn9 aiq8ims aaqpo„
nno[Iv Flnonn qorqnn `aourpu03 atp 01 anueunlivue pasodoud gutauetd Pue gutplmg3o uoTsinIQ
aq,L •QOtsmap gutuoz 6861 S,39H atP u! 6# uoqTpaoo Itrauqreda(I gutuueid Alcmoo tnoij paaaloP
aq Saideospuel joj ;uamaimbai paoq amemopad ayl iECp palsanbai osle lcceotidd8 at{l,
'Z'S' I auqaptnf) croisiaaQ -Iuauiuonnua Sutseajd pue In3q1IE214 E apTnoid
01 pajcnbai aq Kecu $undE3spuei lEtp salels fioSalEo aeq.in aq,l, •:Poda21jje1S atn jo S-b aSed uo
c{)aoj las satociod ueid anisuaqaidcuoD pue `.06 •d uo «samia3 3ilsua)3zeqO„ lapun uoissnosip
Ptle I'9 Ptm i' I'9 sauqapmo uotsloa(j `cmid anisuaqaiducoZ) aaS •spmpuEls 2urdinspuei
jo uopinuatnaidwt puE nondopE s~(junoZ) aqp ononqi `qeyaue AlanooouajE juatudoianap
[ERlacutuoD l03 sinacpsaE3o uotscnoid acp alotnoid asld antsuayaudwoz) ayl jo iC.iog
iecaaatuwoD lofeW aql 3o sarotiod aqZ •AltltoEj liurxmd Suiseaid AlleorlaqlsaE uE 3o uotstno.rd
aqa apniout yocqnt `Z08•tF j-ialciEqo apo:) BucuoZ 3o quacuaimbai gurxied laaiIs -jjo ocp jo lualul
pue asodmd atp ino s,(ei 000'Z08'bI apoo BueuoZ -ju-eocjdde atp Xq palsanbai su sauacuai inba.i
SuTdeospuei ayj jo uoqEotlddB ftilrwt
.1 loj srseq ou spug laurcumxg ay) `f.recuwns uj
-aseqd rejnoqed aql io aaTS ascaua ayi ol paildde aq plno3
sluawaicnbai gurdeospuEl ayi `luvorjdde ay) Aq s)uatuanoidtut alts pasodoid atll uo uoi)RutroJuI
w9~oads aioui,~o uocscnacd a~ yprnn pue `lnauidojanaP3o aseyd ~Efnor~.ned e ao crld IuOcuc~ojanap
11'eian0 acil ae 1001 oi aajge oslE pino:)jjels klunoo pue Ium)ijddE aqZ •panssi puc toj patTdde a.jr
A:)uedn:)oo3o sajeog!ua:) 10 spuuad gutpl!nq se `siseq jEaumaid e uo apetu aq tm3 sit»uiascnbi.,
Qutdeospumi ayiJo uorjEwiddb •s3sn uoonnlaq paxEC{s si Supiied awos lucp puc `liEtu u ui pas'
0131»
~ "
• • .
•
SGC 9.14.020 requires all persons applying for permits or approvals for perniits andlor
final approvals to submiE drainage plans to the County Eogineer for approval, whicll plans must
comply with the "208" drainage standards set forth in SCC Chapter 9.14 and the Guidelines for
Stonnwater Management. SCC 9.14.020, without limitation, lists a number of land use actions
which require tlie submittal of drainage plans, including, in relevant part, rezones and also
"[b]uilding pennits for new construction or substantial improvement". "Substantial
improvement" is defined to mean "...any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure,
ttle cost of which exceeds fifly percent of the market value of the structure either: (A) before the
improvement or repair is started, or (B) if the structure has been damagcd and is bcing restored,
before the damage occurred...". See SCC 9.14.020 (4) and (7).
The Zoning Code also addresses "208" requirements in certain relevant places. Zoning
Code 14.802.080 requires that all paving and bard surfacing on a site provide for proper storm
drainage, as defined in ihe County's Guidelines for Storrawater Management Zoning Code
14.802.080 and 14.802.220 (6-7,14) require consideration of `208" drainage requirements in the
installation of landscaping and other faciiities in parking facilities. The application of these
requirements to the proposal is controlled by Zoning Code 14.802.020, the scope of which was
discussed previously and does not include reliance on the "50%" rule set forth in SCC 9.14.020
(7). Zoning Code 14.100.106 indicates that whenever provisions of the Zoning Code and other
land development regulations overlap or conflict, the more restric#ive provisions shall govern and -
the provisions of the Zoning Code must be met as a minimum. The Examiner also notes that
Chapter 14.802 of the Zoning Code is addressed specifically to "208" drainage requirements for
parking azeas, while SCC 9.14.020 has a more general application. '
The Division of Build.i.ng and Planning contended that the entire site must comply with
"208" drainacre standards, on the basis that redevelopment of the site would exceed 50% of the
assessed value of the property. See Staff Report on p. 6-7, testimony of John Pederson, and letter
dated 1-1-97 from Stacy Bjordahl to Gary Bemardo. Pursuant to a memo daied March 24, 1998,
the County Stormwater Utility, administered by the County Division of Utilifiies, requested that
the entire site be brought up to "208" standards, based on the "50% rule". See memo dated 3-24-
98 from Brenda Sims and Katherine Miller to Stacy Bjordahl. Pursuant to a later memo dated
Apnl 16, 1998, both the Stormwater Utility and County Development Services (part of the
County Division of Engineering and Roads) requested that the applicant's pmpasal to limit the
application of "208" drainage requirements to the newly developed areas of the site be denied.
The memo requested that, to the extent practical the existing hard surface areas on the
site be required to drain to grassed percolation ("208'1 swales. See memo dated 4-16-98 from
Brenda Sims/Katherine Miller and Bill Hemmings to Louis Webster, and memo dated 3-1l-98
from Bill Hemmings to Louis Webster. The Apri116, 1988 memo stated the following rationale
for such request, in pertinent part:
The proposed area covers approxiinately SO acres within the Aqurfer
Sensitive Area. This i.s a relatively large area in an environment know» ta
prod:ice lotiv qriality runoff tlice to the often heavy traffic in parking lols
aird rlte subsequent btrildtip of pollutants between storm events. Every
opportcuritv iieeds to be tak-en to redtcce the amotrnt of ncno11''direcily
ii!jected to tlre Aquifer froni sites like tltis. A site this si?e tivitll a 90%
imperviores area cowerage woulcl reqrrii•e about jour acres of lnfltratio):
urerr lor treating stor•mivtrter. At t/1is coverage tlrere is nrore than elrough
HE Findings. Conclusions and Decision ZE-1SA-89 Pa~e 10
. ~
spure tv lrc,~ut all of tlre nurofffrom the site. Usitrg some innavutive Jesig,i
an e>>en higlrer covervge could be obtuirietl vvlcrle still i,cfrltr«trng a11 of the
,-ir,ivff per the Corrnty desig» criteria...
The applicane testified that the County Public Works Director, Dennis Scott, had previously
advised ttle applicani that it would not Uave to install "208" drainage for the existing parking lot
that would serve the new Rosauer's store. See kestimony of Gary Bernardo. The record includes
a le#ter dated A,pril 9, 1998 from David Peterson of 8& B Real Estate to Dennis Scott, regarding
this representation. The letter rec}uested that the County not require 208 drainage swales for the
new Rosauers parking lot under an interpretation of the "SO% rule", and that the value vf the new
Rosauers store improvement not be counted toward the application of the 50% nsle, based on
certain considerations set forlh in the letter. The ]etter is signed by Dennis Scott with the words
"o.k." and a date of "4-9-9$". The Examiner takes notice thai the County Public Works Director
oversees all County departments dealing with land developmeat, including the Division of
Building and Planning, the Division of Engineering and Roads, and the Division of Utilifies.
The Hearing Examiner finds some weaknesses with this possible administrative decision,
since it appears inconsistent with tben applicable conditions of approval attached to the HEC's
1989 administratitire decision, and does not take into aceount the applicability requirements of
Zoning Code 14.502.020, which would appear to require that "208" be installed in the new store
parkirig lot in the rnanner specified in Zoning Code I4.802.080. Further, even if the 50% rule
stated in SCC 9.14.020 was applicable to the required parking lot landscaping, the rationale
stated ia the April 9, 19981etter appears to misapply the 50% rule. The determinafiion should
arguablv either 1) cornpare the cwrrent assessed value of the structures being demolished or
remodeled for the new store to the cost of the new Rosauer's store and any remodeled structures,
conipare the currenc assessed value of all the existing struchtral 'unprovements to the estimated
cost of remodeling and new construction proposed by the 1- 1 -98 site plan, ar 3) compare the
value of the struchires to be removed/remodeled in a particular phase that includes the new stor+e
versus the cosi of constructing and remodeting for the phase. 1`he new Rosauer's store and the
structures removedlremodeled for such store could logically have been considered separately
&om the rernainder of the site improvements, since the site plan and BSP-56-97 proposes the
creation of a new and separate parcel for such use, and the new Rosauer's st4re tepresents a
separate phase of development
The applicant's architecVagent, Gary Bemardo, contended that it would impractical to
upgrade the northerly half of the site for "208" drainage, indicating that the existing buildings
east of D,artmouth Road sat at a lower elevation than Sprague Avenue, which feahue would
cause drainage water to flow toward the buildings. Bernardo explained that eitlier piping would
have to be installed to pump the drainage to low areas locaied on the site, or that the eacisting
parking areas would have to be torn up and bulk graded to allow water to flow towazd Sprague
Avenue, with a retaining watl installed along Sprague Avenue. Bernardo further commented that
under the 1-1-98 site paan the impervious areas on the north side of the site would ac#ually be
deereased somewhat,
Filz :'os. ZE-1 S-S9lZE-50A-$7NE-38-89 contain a drainage analysis for the shopping
mall eYpansion plarned for the siie in 1989, using a site plan that preceded the Juty 25, 1989 site
plail by a fem.• months. See Drainage Analysis for University City Shopping Mall Eacpansion
prcpared .iune 7, 1959 bv Taylor Engineering, Inc. The drainage analysis states that all
HE FIItCIIIloS. Coczclusions and Decision ZE-1 8A-$9 Page I 1
r
stocmwatcr precipitation origina►ting nn the project and all siornnwater draining to the project
would be collected 1nd diverted to on-site "24S" drainage percolation areas with drywells. This
wottld include tlie installation of a piping system to accommodate drainage from the roofs of new
buildings installed, tivhich would convey drainage to grassed swales Iocated elsewhere on site;
the use of existing drywells to handle drainage from the roofs of existing buildings wbich were
being modified only slightly; and tbe drainage of existing and new parking areas to grassed
swales located adjacent to such parking areas. The drainage pian includes a map shawing 4'208"
storm drainage swales along most of the northerly boundaries of the site, along ihe entire easterly
boundary and along portions of the south boundary of tbe site. The drainage plan supports the
general feasibility of providing "208" drainage for the current project.
In summary, the Examiner sees no basis for modifying the HEC conditions regarding "208"
drainage, which means the project would be required to comply with the landscaping
requirements of the Zoning Code to the extent they are applicable to the site under Zoning Code
Chapter 14.802, and to the extent they are applicable under other land use regulations. The
policies af the Major CommeECial category, which may be applied to the entire site under the
c`transition policy" stated in the Comprehensive Plan, encourage adequate stormwater control in
compliance with adopted policies, plans and regulations for lands developed for cornmercial
uses. See Comprehensive Plan, Decision Guidelines 6.1.5 and 6.1.6; and see discussiou under
"Transition Area" on p. 11 of the introduction ta 4he Comprehensive Plan and definition of .
"transitional areas" in the glossary of the Comprehensive Plan. The HEC in its 1989 decision
found that approval of the 1989 redevelopment proposal would enhance the environment and its
aesthetics by requiring comgliance with "248" stormwater regulations and irnposing landseapiag
standards, among other conditions of approval. See HEC 5ndings #10 (h).
The application of the adopted drainage requirements to individual changes in use or
buildings on the site, requiring either a building permit or certificate of occupation, would be
determined by County administrative staff at such as the changes are ready to be made. There is
insufficient information for the Hearing Examiner to make such determination for the enlire site
or redevelopment projeet. Conceivably, a drainage plan for the entire site or for a particulat
phase of development could be determined by County staff at such time as a more definite site
plan has been submitted by the applicant for the whole site or for a particular phase. The Connty
wili have to determine if a binding administrative decision has been made regarding the
appl.ication of "248" requirements to the parking lot for the new Rosauer's store, based on the
April 9, 19981etter from David Peterson to Dennis Scott referenced above.
4. S i a-naee
The applicant requested that the special signing requiremeats for the 1989 redevelopment
proj ect stated in HEC condition # 10 be deleted, and that signage be as allowed in the B-3 zone
with separate calculations far Sprague, University aad the Valley Couplet froncage." See
Exhibit C. In makin; these requests, the applicant contended that the reduced signage ordered by
the HEC in 1989 was appropriate for the regional mall contemplated in the 1989 redevelapment
plan, but was not appropriate for the community-based mall being proposed, which included
several retail pads located outside a mall setting. The applicant argued that B-3 zone signage
was needed to compete with other B-3 users located along Sprague Avenue which already had
such signagz, and that national retailers and other users such as banks, convenience stores and
HE Findincis, Conciusions and Decision ZE-1 8/1-89 PaQe 12
t
, .
~
.
jas statio,is wliieh would be attracted to the site would want such signage. See Exliibit C, and
testimony of Gary Bernardo and David Peterson.
The applicani also offered testimony that signage along both Sprague Avenue and Second
Avenue (south leg of Valley Couplet) was needed, since some tisers would be orieilted toward
traffic frotn either or bolh arterials, and because the County would be negafiively impacting traffie
volumes passing the site along Sprague Avenue by making it a one-way street. The applicant
aIso pointed out that signage was already provided along University Road for the Rosauer's store
and the Tacso Bell outlet, and that signage alaag both Sprague Avenue and the south Ieg of the
proposed Valley couplet were critical for University City uses to be able to coriapete. See ExhYbit
C, and testimony of Gary Bernardo and David Feterson.
County staff requested that HEC condition #10 not be changed, on the basis that extensive
signage already existed in the area, that allowing signage based on the Zoning Code would
simply extend competitive "sight pollution" along the arterials abutting the site, that a large
number of freestanding signs on the site were not desirable, and that Sprague Avenue and Second
Avenue should not both be used to compute frontage and sign anea. County staff cited the
example of Division Street as an example of eaccessive sight pollution, and pointed to the
Wanderniere sbopping mall as an example of a successful eommunity mall without excessive
signage. See StaffReport, p. 6; and testimony of Louis Webster and lohn Pederson. The -
Examiner notes that the County Planning Departrnent cited similar concerns in recommending
restricted sigMe for the 1989 redevelopment proposal. See page A-10 of staff report dated 8-
24-89 in File Nos. ZE-18-89/ZE-SOA-87NE-38-89.
The Major Commercial category di the Comprehensive Plan, which applies to the northerly
90% of the site, encourages the provision of aesthetic standards of physical development along
county arterial rights of way, including a pleasing aesthetically pleasing view as seen by the
traveling public and adjacent landowners wben developed with commereial uses. Such category
reeommends the development of standar+ds regarding laadscaping, signage, storage and
architectural treataient for uses along these rights of way. Comprehensive Plan, Decision
Guidelines 6.1.2 and 6.1.3. The southerly 10% of ihe site and the land lying south of the site are
designated within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, which does not contemplate
major cominercial users. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, discussion under "Detailed
Definition" and "Incompatible Uses". The transition policy allows consideratian of the project
under the policies of the Major Coinmercial category as well as the Urban category policies,
depending on the extent to which the project intrudes into the Urban category and the land use
effects on the uses within such category. See discussion under "Transirion .Area" on p. 11 of the
introduction to the Comprehensive Plan and definition of "transitional areas" in ihe glossary of
the Comprehensive Plan. The land lying south of the easterly third or half of the site, south of
the proposed Valley couplet, is vacant and zoned B-3, while the land lying south of the
remainder of the site and the south leg of the Valley couplet is zoned UR-3.5 and includes vacant
land or single-farnily residences. See Staff Report, p. 1 and zoning maps in file.
Chapter 14.504 of the Zoning Code adopts comprehensive signage standards for various
uses and zones. The particular signage standards for the B-3 zone are set farth in Section
14-804. I20, and appiy differently to individual business siies and "multiple business complexes".
A"multipte business complex" is defined by the Zoning Code to mean a"...group of structures,
or a sin~le stnicture, «•ith dividing ~val[s and separate entrances for each business, housing at
HE Findiilgs, Conclusians and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 13
s • • .
teast two (2) retail btisinesses, offices, commercial venlures or independent or separate parts of a
busincss wliicll share the samc lot, access and/or parking facilities." See Zoning Code
14.300.100. 'I'he requirements for "attached" or "wall" signs are listed under Zoning Code
14.804.120, and depend on the amount of "frontage" the sice has on public rights of way. "Lot
frontage" or "frontage" is defined under Zoning Code 14.300.100 as the length of that portion of
a lot abutling the public street providing principal access to the lot".
HEC condition #10 restricis "detached" or "freestanding" signs on the site to one sign
along University Road, one sign along the county right of way to the south and two signs along
Sprague Avenue; and further limits such signs io 250 square feet in surface area and 40 feet in
height above grade. Zoning Code 14.804.120 (2) restricts freestanding signs for "multiple
business complexes" to no more than two (2) square feet per lineal foot of "frontage" along a
street up to a maximum of 250 square feet in sign area, and up to a maximum height of 40 feet
above grade. Qne additional sign of such type is permitted for each 200 feet of "frontage" or
portion thereof that is above the origina1200 feet. For individual building sites with lot frontages
exceeding 200 feet, Zoning Code 14.804.120 (c) authorizes freestanding signs which may not
exceed two square per linea] feei of street frontage up to a maximum of 200 square feet in sign
area, which signs are not more than 35 feet above grade, and which have no more than one such
sign for eacb 200 feet of street frontage or portion thereof.
The parties provided litde guidance to the Hearing Examiner on what the true impacts
would be from altowing signage for the project based on the Zoning Code, and aiiowing
businesses with muliiple frontages along Sprague Avenue, LJniversity Road and the south leg of
the Valley couplet to Count all &ontages to deternvne allowable signage under the Zoning Code.
The July 25, 1989 site development plan associated with the HEC's 1989 decision iitustrated one
large mall complex which housed all the major retailers, mall shops and cinema; along with three
(3) independent building pads. The four (4) detached signs allowed by HEC condition #10
would have allowed one detaChed sign for the mall complex and one detached sign for each
independent retail pad illustrated on the 1989 site plan. The 1-1-98 site plan for the current
proposal shows one (I) complex af three major retailers and two (2) individual building pads
located west of Dartmouth Road, the new Rosauer's building site, a stand-alone restaurant, a
stand-alone tire s:are, a complex of shops located between the Rosauer's store and Major Retailer
#Z, the enclosed mall complex, and six (b) other individual building pads scattered around the
site. This represents a total of 14 separate building complexes and individual building sites on
the subject propeny, or arguably the need for up to 14 deiached signs.
The total frontage for the site along public roads is esiimated by the Hearing Examiner
from the 1-1-98 site plan to be about 4,250 feet, which divided by 200 feet per siga represents a
maximum potential allowance of about 21 freestanding signs on the premises. This number of
signs may not be allowed under the Zoning Code since the entue public road frontage aronnd the
site cannot necessarily be claimed as providing principal access to the businesses on the
premises. Gomparing this number with the number of individual businesses and complexes on
the site, the Hearing Examiner Fnds no compelling rationale for either retaining HEC conditi
on '
# 10, or for grantin~ the applicant's request that the froatage of a loi along all fronting str
eets be
counted for the purpose of computing frontag
,e and sign area. The Examiner has no authority to
authorize more signaae tban the signage standards of the B-3 zone allow, since an application for
a sign variance was not submitted.
HE Findiilas, Conclusions and Decision ZE-l 8A-89 Page 14
• ' ' ~ The iclclusion of multipie frontages in the signage calculation depends on the siiterpreiation
df'the ternl "frontaac". The deFnition of "lot frontage" ("frontage") under Zoning Code
14.30A.100 sucigests that a building site may have only one principal access for the purpose of
calculating signage atlowances under Zoning Code 14.804.120, based on the arrtount of frontage
along a public right of way. County Division of Building and Planining staff has, no doubt, made
previous interpretations on this issue, since ihere ate other commercial sites in the unincorporated
area with double frontages, even atong one-way street couplets (e.g. Argonne/Mullan Roads).
Further, thece is insufficieRt information in the record to deternnine signage allowances vnder the
Zooing Code for the individual businesses or complexes illustrated on the site plan. Signage will
be allowed for the site in aceordance with the Zoning Code, as lawfully interpreted by the
County. Administrative interpretations are appealable to the Hearing Examiner. The Examiner
finds no j«stification for aUowing the project more signage than the Zoning Code allows,
balancing aesthetic concerns versus the applicant's stated needs for signage.
5. Submittal of "master development plan" or revised site plan
The applicant at the public hearing requested that the site plan dated l- I-98 serve as the
"Master Development Plan" required by HEC condition #4. County staff testified that such plan
was adequate to serve as a concept plan for the purpose of cunrent Building and Planning
~ condition #4, provided the disclaimer on the site plan was removed. This was acceptable to the
applicant. See testimony of Louis Webster and Gary Berrtardo. County staff also testified that
the site plan was not adequate to make certain determinations, such as the amount of required
` pazking for the project and signage raequirements. The Examiner has modified the conditions of
approval to address these issues.
6. Roads
'1'he 1-1-98 site plan contemplates the vacation of Dartmouth Road, as provided in current
Division of Engineering and Roads condition #1 to the HEC's decision. Such vacation is
opposed by both County Engineering and Spokane County Fire District No. 1, for rneritorious
reasons. See letter dated 4-14-98 from Fire Chief Pat Humphries to Louis Websier, testimony of
Larry Herberhol2, condition #2 of Engineer's Conditions of Approval (4-16-98), and testimony
of Scott Encrelhard. During the public hearing, County Engineering agreed to revise current
Division af Engineering and Roads condition #2, to reflect that negotiations aze under way with
the applicant for the Couniy's acquisition of right of way for Dartmouth Road and the south leg
of the Valley Couplet, rather than flatly imposing a dedication requirement for such rights of
way. See testimony of Scott Engelhard. The applicant indicated that negotiations with County
Engineering for such rights af way were going well. See testimony of Gary Bernardo. The
Examiner has adopted the revised Counry Engineering condition reflected in Exhibit A. The
Examiner has also deleted County Engineering Depariment condition #I to the HEC's 1989
decision. County Engineering did not oppose any of the applicant's requests to delete certain
County En6neering Dcpartment conditions attaehed to the HEC's decision, as stated in
Attachment 1 to the application.
HE FicidinQs. Cvnelusions and Decision ZE- t 8A-89 Page 15
~
~ ' • • .
r
7. C'onsistencv with nubiic health* safety and general welfare; cornpliance with the
Snokane Couniy Zonine Code and other apDlicable development reaulations
Based on the above analysis, the Examiner finds that the proposal, as conditioned,
generally cenforms to the Comprehensive Plan, and the purpose and intent set forth for the
Regional Business (B-3) zone in Zoning Code 14.628.100. The site plan dated 1-1-98 is a
conceptual plan and does not necessarily reflect compliance with the Zoning Code and all
applicable regulations. There are outstanding issues relating to application of landscaping,
drainage, signage, ete. requirements to particular site development which cannot be fully
resolved without more information. The Examiner has provided some guidance herein in
interpreting the applicable code requirements. These application issues wil] need to be resolved
before the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy if required. See Zoning Code
Chapters 14.408 and 14.410. However, the proposal is conditioned for compliance with the B-3
zone, applicable provisions of the Zoning Code, and other applicable regulations. As
conditioned, the Examiner finds the proposed change of conditions to be in compliance with the
development standards of the B-3 zone, other applicable provisiom of the Zoning Code, and
applicable development regulations.
The applicant did not oppose any of the conditions of approval recommended by County
departments and public agencies, except as noted. The Examiner has eliminated some of the
HEC conditions because they are iedundant of currently proposed conditions, superseded, or
replaced by other conditions. The St.aff Report on page 6 observes that the legal description of
the property has chanaed since fhe HEC's 1989 zoning decision. The 7Examiner agrees that the
HEC's 1989 decision continues to apply to the Taco Bell site (parcel #45201.0I 10) located at the
southwest corner of Sprague Avenne and University Road, since such parcel was included in the
1989 present zoning action. However, the Staff Report incorrectly concludes that the parcel of
land located at the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartiiouth Road (parcel
#45201.0311) was part of the HEC's 1989 zoning actions and is affected by the HEC's 1989
decision. The legal description contained in County Planning Department condition #1 to the
HEC's 1989 decision does not include these parcel, nor do the maps of the site contained in the
staff report dated August 24, 1989 for the 1989 proposal include such parcel. Further, the dotted
lines delineaFing the subject property on the site plan dated 7-25-89 do not include such parcel.
8. The Qrouosal. as conditionedf complies with the provisions of the State Environmental
Poiicv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance.
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter l 1.10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met. The Hearing Fxaminer concurs with the Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS) issued by the Division of Building and Planning. No public agency
requested withdrawal or modification of the DNS. The current zoning action will not have more
than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment.
HE Findinds, Canclusions aiid Decision ZE-18A-S9 Page 16
. • • .
.
III. DECISIDN
Ba,sed on thc Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, che above application for a change
of conditioils is hereby approved in part, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies
specified below, and denied in part, as follows:
1. The follo«ring conditions of approval attached to thc Spokane County Hearing Examiner
Committee (HEC) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order dated August 25,1989 in File Nos.
ZE-1 8-89/ZE-50A-$7NE-38-89 are hereby retained and shall be applied to the change of
conditions: HEC conditions #3, 6-8 and 11; County Pl3nning Department conditions #4-6; atl
County Building and Safety Department conditions; and aU Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority conditions.
2. The follawing conditions of approval attached to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner
Committee (HEC) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order dated August 25, 1989 in File Nos.
ZE-18-89/ZE-50A-87/VE-38-89 are hereby deleted and do not apply to the application: HEC
conditions #1-2, 4-5, 9-10; County Planning Department conditions #1-3, 7-9; and all County
Engineering Department, County Utilities Departmeat, eounty Health Disfirict and Water
Purveyor conditions.
3. The following additional conditions of approval are imposed, with conditions added or
significantly revised by the Hearing Examiner italicized:
-
SPOK.ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUIILDING AND P G
1- All conditions unposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term sball include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The Change of Conditions applies to the following rea] property:
That portion of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 and that portion of the Plat of Opporiunity, as
per Plat recorded in Volume "K" of Piats, Page 20, 21, 22 and 23 in the Northeast quarter of
Section 20, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington, being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning on the South righht of way line of Sprague Av3enue at the Northwest corner of
Lot "B" of Short Plat No. SP-1019-95 Recorded in Book 12 of Short Plat, Pages 84 and 85,
Spokane County, Washington; thence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along the West line of said Lot "B",
160.09 feet to the Southwest comer of said Lot "B"; tlience N. 87° 09' 35" E., alang he South
line of said Lot "B", 126.56 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot "B" and the West right of
way line v f University Road; thence S. 02° 30' 34" E., along said West right of way lines 559.62
feet to the centerline of proposed Znd Avenue; thence S. 84° 45' 03" W., along the proposed
centerline of Avenue, 203.74 feet to the begirl.ning of a curve to the left the radius of whicb
bears S. 05° 14' 57" E., a distance of 700.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerline and
curve to the left, through a central angle of 16° 15' 08", an arc distance of 198.56 feet to a point
of tangencv; thence S. 68° 29' 55" W., along said proposed centerline, 393.88 feet to the
beginnina of a curve to the ri~ht the radius of which bears N. 21° 30' 05" W., a distance of
HE Findinns, Conclusions and Decision ZE-iSA-89 Paae 17
, . .
~ • .
700.00 fcct; thcnce along said propased centerline and curve to the right, through a central angle
of 1 8° 39' 41", an arc distance of 227.99 feet to a point of tangency; thence S. 870 09' 36" W.,
along said proposed centerline, 646.08 feei to the beguning of a curve to the right the radius of
tivhich bears N. 02° 50' 24" W_, a disiance of 1000.00 feet; thence along said proposed centerIine
and curve to the righi, througll a central angle of 15° 5 1 ' 28", an are distance 276.77 feet to a
point of tangency; thence N. 76° 58' 56" W., along said proposed centerline, 339.14 feet, to the
projected East rigbt of way line of Walnut Road; thence N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said East right
o f way line, 596.55 feet to the South line of the North 200.00 feet of Tracts 224 and 223 of said
Plat of Opportunity; thence N. 87° 09' 35" E., along said South line, 503.80 feet to the West
right of way line of Dartmouth Road; thence N. 02° 30' 34" W., along said West risht of way
line, 200.00 feet to the South right of way Iine of Sprague Avenue, thence N. 87° 09' 35" E.,
along said South right of way line, 1610.04 feet to the Point of Beginning.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and tlie Spokane Coru:ty
Zoning Code, as amended.
4. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance witb the site
developme,tt plan submitted on .Ta»uary 1, 1998, notwithstanding the disclaimer set forth on the
site plan, aiad coniingent on compliance with all conditions ofapproval and applicable
regulativ,js. Variations, when approved by the Division Duectorldesignee, may be permitted,
including, but not limited ta building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the
permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulaiions set forth in the Spokane County
Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. The Division
Director/designee may require the submittal of a more specific site development plan prior to
issuance o,J'building permits, in order to verify compliance wrth the conditiorrs of approval or
applicable reg711ations.
5. Approval is required by the Division Directorldesignee of a specific liehting and signing
pian for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
6. A specific landscape plan, planring schedule and provisions for maintenanee acceptable to
the Division Directorldesignee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable
guarantee for the project prior to release of building pennits. Landscaping shall be installed and
maintained so that sight distance at access points is noi obscured or impaired.
7. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
8. The Division of Building & Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety af special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and sha11 only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building & Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as (described above in condition no. 2) is the subject of a
HE Findinas, Conclusions and Decision ZE-1$A-89 Page 18
. •
s
lanci use actioii by the Spakane County Hearing Examincr on Arrii 29, 1998, imposing a variety
of special clevciapmcnt coaditions. File No. ZE-18A-89 is available fac inspection and copying
in thc Spoka,le County Division of Building & Planning.
9• A ny rlivrsiofi of laitd for the purpose ofsale. IeQSe or trnirsfer shall coniply with chapter
58.17 RCIE' ail(ltoi- the S'pokupte G'ounty Sttbdivisiotr Ortlirttrnce prior to the issira»ce of btrilding
perir:its.
10. ,SlglfClgG' shall be allowed as pernrittetl ir: the Regiona113iesrness (13-3) zone.
SPOKANE COUriTY DIVISXOIV OF ENGINEERING AIVD ROADS
Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction
with a County Road Project/Road Irnprovement District, whichever comes first:
1. The applicant shall de{iver for ace,eptance by the County Engineer a clear and
unencumbered right-of-way deed for University Road which.was constructed in conjunction with
CRP #2298.
2. _ The applicant and Spokane County are currently negotiating the required right-of-way for
the Valtey Couplet and Dartmouth Road as shown on the adopted right-of-way Plan for County
Road Project No. 2396. A copy of the approved plan is atzached as "F.xhibit A"to tlre
Engineer's Cotiditiotrs oJ,flpproval dated A_pril 16, 1998 in the project,f'i1e f'or the application, '
and is liereb}? incorporated by reference Irerein.
3. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer. The accesses i!lustrated on the site developmerrt plan dQted 1-1-98 have »ot
been approved.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
5. The appiicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane
County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system pian and suTf'ace water
disposal plan for che entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased,
6. A pari;ing plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalis shall be in accord.ance
with standard engineering practic.e.s. Paving or surfacing as appmved by the County Engineer
wi11 be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
7. A11 required improvements shall confonn to the current State of Washington Standard
Speciftcations for Road and Bridge construction and oiher applicable county standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless othenvise approved by the Co«nty Engineer.
S. No direct access is a12owed from lots to the Valley Couplet right-of-way until the Va11ey
Couplet is cQilstrueted and established by the Board of County Commissioners and an approach
H E Fi nd i ngs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-1 8A-89 Page 19
1 . .
pennit is issued by liie County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of Caunty Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498 and chapter 9.14 ojthe
Spoka,ie County Code and as amended and are applicable to iliis proposal.
10. No constniction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
11. The appticant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane Couniy will assume no financial obligaiion for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
reloeation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
12. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Righi of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
-
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT '
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spoicane -
County. .
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Direcior of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an exasting public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each building.
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibiied.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1- Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connection and facilities for review and approval.
2. Sewer plans acceptabie to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance
of the sewer constructiozi permit.
3• ArranJements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities char9es. Charoes may be substaniial depending upon the nature of the devetopment.
HE Findings, Cor.clusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 20
• 3
e . . ~
~
4. Any water service for this project sha11 be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water Systc;m plan for Spokane County, as amended.
5. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be conshvcted.
Sewer connectian permit is required.
SPOKANE 'I'RANSIT AUTHOIRITY
I. Transit pullouts and room for passenger shelters should be provided along major arterials
with associated sidewalks.
2. Pedestrian pathways should be marked and clearly delineated from the curb to mal I entry.
HE Findinas, Conclusions and Decision ZE-18A-89 Page 21
.
.
c fi• • ' .
' F
• •
DATED this 19th day of 3une, 1998.
SPUKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
4,vtaj C. ~
Michael C. Dempsey, WSBA #'75~
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISI0N AND NOTICF, OF R.IGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner
on an application for a change of conditions application is final and conclusive uniess within
twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party wtth standing
files a land use petition in superior court pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter
36.70G RCW, the date of issuance of ihe Hearing Examiner's decision is three days after it is
mailed. _
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on June 19, 1998. The date of
issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is therefore June 22, 1998. THE LAST DAY FOR
APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS
JUI.Y 13, 1998. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period
with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490. The fiIe may be inspected
during normal working hours, listed as Manday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the
hours of 8:00 am. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance.
HE Findinas, Conclusions and Decision ZE-1$A-89 PaJe 22
'
'
. ,
• • ,
J
r -
0
~
• ~
~
~
"
UIVIVERSITY CITY MALL
• Spokane, Washington
TRAFFIC 1 M PACT STU DY
~
.I
P~repared for
Winvest Development Corp.
~
' Prepared by
EIVTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC.
5808lake Washington Blvd.. N.E.
Suite 200
Kirkland. Washington 98033
(206) 827=1300
. o ,
June 1,989
; a
: J
o ~
V E
, ~
. . ~ .
.
ci
. ~
~
TA6LE 'OF COIVTENTS - , Paqe. •
. , - -
~
INTRO,DUCTION 1
, -
METHODULOGY AND ASSUMPTtONS
Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . 1
,Background Growth . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 3,
t Impact Anaiysis . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
~ EXIST{NG CONDITiONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . 4
~
• - TRAFFIG IMPACTS
, 1,991.'Weekday P.M., Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . • 9
1991 Saturday, Peak Hour . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
MITIGATION
199,1 Weekday 'P:M. Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,
~ 1991 Saturday Peak Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
I
APPEN DIX - ,Level of -Service Concept
,
.r,.
~
~
~i
~
{
~ •
~ .
, 1 -
FIGURES _ Paqe
,
1 Site'Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . _ . - 2
~ 2 Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . 5
► ~
3 Exisang Average,Daily Traffic at Major IntersecOons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
° C 4 1989 P.M. Peak Hour Turriing Movements 7
, • -
5 1991 Project,P.M,. Peak, Hour Trip Oistribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,
6 1991 P.M. Peak Hour Turning 'Movements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
s 7 1991 Saturday Peak Hour Turning Movements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,
,
A ~
w-
` ' TABLES Paqe
~ - -
' . 1 I'ntersecUon Level of Service, Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,t. . 8
. ,
~ 2 Trip'.Generadon Esdmates . . 9
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, ,
~
~
0
;
D
(
I'
• e
, INTRODUCTION
The University City Mall is a regional mall located in the btock bounded by Sprague
Avenue, University Road, Second Avenue, and Dartmouth Road in the Dishman district
of urbanized Spokane County (figure 1). The exisUng malt has approximately 421.000
square feet of retail space. The proposed renovation of the site includes demolibon of
the majority of the exisiing retail area and expansion of tfie mall to a total leasable floor
area of 889.700 square feet by August 1991.
The proposed layout for the mall will include 7 access driveways: 4 driveways on
Sprague Avenue and one driveway each on University Road, Second Avenue, and
Walnut Road. The new mall will also have 3 on-site parlcing structures. Two 5-leve!
~ parlcing structures will be constructed. each accommodating roughly 1,200 cars, one
located on the west side of the site and the other along University Road to the easL
. The third parking structure will be located on the south side of the site along Second
' Avenue and will accommodate roughly 670 cars. In addition, there will be 1.200
surface parking spaces surrounding the mail.
' This study idenfifies the traffic impacts associated with the renovation and expansion of
` the mall and determines what road improvements will be necessary to miagate any
significant adverse impacts. The guidelines for evaluating the traffic impacts were
developed from meetings with Spokane County's traffic engineering staff.
.
METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS
~
„ TriQ Generation
n The trips generated by the development were based on rates from the ITE Trip
Generaflon Manual. 4th edition. The trips rates are based on numerous field studies of
established shopping centers of various sizes. The use ot these trip rates will
generate estimated driveway traffic volumes.
The esamated traffic votumes were adjusted downward to reflect the phenornenon of
passerby trips. A passerby trip is a vehicle trip that already exists on an adjacent
° street before development of a particular project but which will be attracted to the new
projeci once it is in ptace. Since the ITE rates reflect total trips entering and leaving a
° site, inctuding pass•by trips, the esdmated trips must be reduced before assigning
the trips to the street system. Without this reduction, the net increase in traffic due to
the new project woutd be overestimated since it would double-count the passerby
triRs. The passerby reduction for weekday and Saturday traffic was 24 percent and 15
percent , respectively.
Since 421,00 square feet of retail space is currenUy in use at the matl. only the net
increase in traffic due to the expansion was added to the traffic in the surrounding
street system.
Trip Distribution
The project trips were distributed to the streei system based on the travel pattern of
existing mall shopping trips. The existing pattern was estabiished by examining mall
driveway counts perfomned as a paR of this study. The distribution was vatidated by
comparing it to the results ot a license plate survey of exisang mall shoppers that was
recenUy performed for a market analysis of the mall expansion.
1
11 11 ,
~ I
, ~ ► ~ W ~
~~N,
a o"pi7~9~ q pr r ~ 4+ LJ. Z
O Yf ~t I ~
a,~ a V
; z a a ~ a~ W" >
~ -te~
~
r
1 1 `
~o rl 1 1 W
a 1 1 ~ ►~i
~ w r y%WP%o- Y
r 0 ~ 1r7 `M p 0~ j ,~~r CU WU ~ tN" t
w ,
~4 ~ ~ ~ - x ~ ~ ~ ~;c~'~ :
N1Y
JU lf
S 81~M e -~I rla ~ ~ ~Qt
-~lu: ~
~ ' ,•'~I ~ J ~ , . ~ I I
Ll
.
f x ~
tlLtlw~~ , r r~
.
3~0 1 1 ~ Mud " ~ ❑ rti~ae ~a , , ~
~ . ~ ~
~ d~►ur ' itu n.
r
VN rrA ~ ~ 9 , n , +rY ON► ~
i
~ ~ ~ ~ iJ1 •4!'~111 a ' ~ 7
= 1 ~ ~Y r 1A'~ ~ F+ ~ t ~11d 4t~:)
~ 0v '7 `
~~ow~
•F
~una~' F' G o►
a
Q~~
y"ac' W
f ~ r • z
, ~
~ ~ S ~ „ ~o~ ~s,~u"'.+ S W
G .
r ~d~ w
r ~ •
/f t J + T~a ~~wtlr!'h rtW p i
o- P~tp~► ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~~►a ~ 0~'~~~rr
~ "1CY~ ~ ~ Q
*t' ~ od '~C> > ~ ~ ' ' l3U ~
f iri
, ~ j _ ~ • a ~ ~
. ~ ow~ro~ ~ ~
, ~ s~ ~ ,
.r' ~
• ,
The project trips were assigned to the site access drives based on the location of
major retaiters and the availabitity of parking. As Is true for the existing mall, right
in/right out only access was assumed for the Sprague Avenue driveway to the east of
Raymond Road. Fuli access was assumed for ali of the other site dnveways. Due to
the change in tlhe distribution of parking capacity from the existing surface spaces in
front of the mail to parking structures on the sides and rear of the expanded mail, there
will be a change in the distribution of access traffic. Currently, 54 percent of the
entering traffic and 45 percent of the exiting traffic use the Sprague Avenue driveways.
in the future, with a higher proportion of rnall traffic using University Road and Walnut
Road to access the parking structures, these percentages will drop to 38 percent and
40 percent respectively.
, Backqround Traffic Growth
p_ The annual growth in Vaffic on the surrounding street system was determined based
on a review of historical traffic counts by the County over the past 10 years. The
- review indicated that the annual rate of growth has varied from 1 percent at certain
jntersections to 5 percent at other locations in the vicinity of the site, with an overall
average of about 2 percent. This figure is consistent with the County's estimate of
future traffic growth and with growth rate assumed in other recent traffic studies in the
area. Therefore, a 2 percent annual growth rate was chosen to apply to the existing
counts (done as a part of this study and by the County) to estimate future background
traffic votumes.
Imaact Analysis
The impact analyses were based on the procedures outlined in the 1985 Highway
Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Traffic control
and signal timing information was obtained from County of Spokane staffi for the
signalized tocations of Broadway Avenue/University Road, Sprague Avenue/University
Road, and the potential Felts Road extensioNSprague Avenue. This informauon was
also obtained for the future signalized intersecUon of Sprague Avenue/Gillis Road. The
University Road/Fourth Avenue intersection is unsignali2ed. The capaciry anatysis was
performed for the existing and future (1991) cases.
°The two cases were anatyzed for the weekday p.m. peak hour and the Saturday peak
hour. For the existing case, the weekday p.m. peak hour occurred between 3:30 and
6:30 P•m. for the anal ed intersecfions, while tlhe Saturda
Yz y peak hour occurred during
the 12:00 - 2:15 p.m. period. The traffic volumes used in the future analysis were
derived in the following manner:
Step 1. Subtract existing mall traffic from the weekday p.m. peak hour and
Saturday peak hour counts to obtain existing background traffic.
Step 2. Estimate future background traffic by applying annual growth factor to
existing background traffic.
Step 3. Add project traffic to future background traffic to obtain total future traffic.
The Saturday case was only analyzed to provide a margin of safety in the tratfic impact
assessment, by evaluating the recommended mitigations for p.m. peak hour conditrons
under worst case conditions to isolate and determine if any bottlenecks would occur.
3
The following procedure was used to analyze the signaliied intersecaons:
Step 1. Anatyze the intersection with the existing signal timing and geometry.
- Step 2. Mibgate any adverse impacts by improvements to signal timing/phase
~ only.
Step 3. if step 2 fails to adequately mifigate the impacis, miagate dhe adverse
impacts by geometric and signal timing improvements at the
intersecaon.
• Impact mitigation was recommended when the levei of service (LOS) at ihe
intersection deteriorated to a level worse than the existing LOS. The degree of
congestion at an intersection is ranked on a scale of A to F. with LOS A represenang
uncongested conditions and LOS F representing over capacity conditions. A complete
description of intersection level of service can be found in the appendix.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Primary access to the existing mail is provlded by three streets bordering the site:
~ Sprague Avenue on the north, University Road on the east, and Dartmouth Road on
~ the west. Second Avenue borders the site to the south, however, there are no major
~ mail entrances on this side of the mall. Sprague Avenue and University Road are
principal arterials which carry 25.300 and 13,600 vehicles per day, respectively.
Sprague Avenue is a 7-lane divided facility with channelized turn pockets between
~ intersections and feft turn lanes at the intersecfions. University Road is a 41ane
undivided tacility with no left turn lanes. Dartmouth Road is a Iocat access street
~ Figure 2 shows the street network and channelizadon,and figure 3 shows average daily
traffic at major intersections. ,
Two additional facilities in the vicinity of the site that are significantly affected by mail
traffic are Broadway Avenue and FoLrth Avenue. Broadway Avenue is a 41ane
undivided principal arterial camying 12.000 vehicles per day. Fourth Avenue is a 2-
fane east-west collector located 2 blocks south of the site.
~ Immediatety south of the site, the Spokane Transit Authorily operates a temporary
transit center at University RoacUThird Avenue. The transit center is served by 7
routes with 274 weekday bus trips. Roughly 40-60 bus patrons utilize the center's
temporary park-and-ride lot on a daily basis. By late summer of 1989, a permanent
transit center will be constructed at this lacation. It may ulamately accommodate 10
routes operating at one-half hour headways, with an additional 150 weekday bus trips,
and will aiso feature 236 park and-ride spaces. In addition, the existing mail is
served by 2 bus stops along Sprague Avenue and one stop along University Road.
The existing mail is surrounded on three sides by primarily commercia!/retail
devetopment. The area to the south of the site is residential.
The 5 analyzed intersections currenUy operate at LOS D or better during the weekday
~ p.m. peak hour. The only signaiized intersecdon that operates at LOS D is Sprague
Avenue/University Road. A summary of the exisang tevels of service at the 5
intersecdons is shown in table 1. The 1989 p.m. peak hour turning movements are
shown in figure 4.
~
4
4
1
_ _ ACAD C: PROJ~CTSy890~3-61~tlw ~ 3033-61\U1N.DWG 6/5/$9
~
LQS ~ ~
4 iANES UNDIV~DED 1dD1V)DED
POTENTIA~.
~'ELTS R+DAD - ~~4ADWAY AV~. ~
EXrENSION BA►LFOUR R4A0 RAYM 4ND ROAD
~ 7 ~ANES DIVIDEO 1NITH LE~ TURN
IAN~S GILUS ROAD
sP~cu~ ~av~, ~os a~
~as ~ ~ ~os B ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ G~ 4
'7' T
`~I' ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~V
~ ~ ~ HDT 74 SCRM
2 LAN~S
L~S D~ ~ G D*
~ a
o~ ¢ 0
c~ ~
~ o
~ ~ ~
,
a , ~
~
~ L~GVES ~NaiVIDED
~
SE~~ND AU'~,
>
2 L~1NES ~
I~~S D*
2 I~NES
FOURTH AVE.
LOS C#
~ 1- . ~
SPO N * - APP~lES IDEN KA E TRANSIT ~PPROACH ~N~.Y
AUTHQRITY ROUT~ i ~
~
CH ONLY
E~1Srl . ~
EH'I'RANC4ENGINE~RS, INC.
FIGURE 2 ,
EX1STING CONDITlQiVS '
~
~ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - _ -
' ~ - - , - - - - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - ' 'ACAO ~~C:~ 'P~tQJE , ~ 89Q33-fi1~1J . - - - - - - _ - - -
. - - - - _ - -
~ I ° - ~ ~ ' ' ~3QQ~
~
, . , a~~~~ ~ ~ , ~
~ , ~
~ _ r _l~ - - ~ FELTS - - ~ ~ ~ ROAD , , _ ~ BR~aD1~AY° AV£.
- - - - - - r - - - EXTEN5IQN BALF~UR RdA - RAYM~ ~ R- D Np pAD I
- ~ - 11',9~60~ ~ , I i i ~ i
~ ~ i I 4
_ ~ ;~8li4~~~ - ~ ~ GI 'R~AO~ ~
" I ~ - ~ - - , I
~ Sp"~~ - ' 550~„--- , f~AGUE ~AVE. . , I - . ~ - ~ i
~ I ~ - ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ - 6g~,a' ~
~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ i - - - - - - ~ ! i ~ - i ~
- ~ ,.u. ~ - - ~ _ _ - _ _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ,
, ~ I ~
~ 2'S290~ y~ ~ , _ l ~ 'NOI' T4 SC,AU
~ - - ~ , ~ ~ - ~~1~355'0 , ~ ~
~ , _ _ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ' r1 il
i
r t p ~ fl - , lY - I
. - ~O I, ~ ~ i 'i Y i~ - ~
~ , ~ , ~ , I
~ I
d ~ - ~ r~ i ~ "
~ i ~ _ _ D' ~ ~ ~ _ •Z I
r ~ ~ ~ -7
I , ~ ~ I
~ _ _ - - - - _ ; - - - , ~ - - - S~~ON~' AV , I
, _ -
I ,
i ~ ~ il
~ ~ _ ~~02~~ i' I
i-. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i ; - - !
- - - - - - - - - -~~u~ ~4~E. d ,l 1 p~ ~ ~ C ~
; ~ 1~ ~ ,
770 u ~ ~ ~I
y ~
, ~ , I
I
, - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ~ - _
, - _ - - - - - _ -
, ~
~ ~ , _''IF1GURE =3' i w a• r~.r.. w~ w a~■ ti•J~ ThA~~fi ~ 'i~~t;' ~~~?.s. "1if.~ ~r'^ •
- E7~IST~NG ~AVERAG ~ F.~dYAd~CO'EPIGINf ~ ~ ~ ~
~ - - _ ~R~~ INC. ~ , _ , - - - - AT MAJOf . - - - - - - ~ ~
ll
_ ~ I~ ~ ■ . . ~ j .
Y - f .
G
r~l,nu ~:,P'P~UJC1ii5,q~VJJ~~ u~ .,f ~
~ ~
~ ~
20 d i 15 135 10 ~qp
~ ~a
I ~ r ELTS RU~a BR~ADWAY E AV ~ ~ ,
E~TENSION ~DUR ROAD ~r~a~u ~o~a ~
' ~p ~ ,oo ,~a ~s
~B~
GlLLIS RDAp
~ sP~cu~ ~av~.
~ a t7o ~o
~ ~ ezo ~5 o sa ~ ~s o o ~a so ~sa ~za ~ n ~o ~ ~ ~a~ a ticoo
74 ~ 1 ~s 75 8~ ~
r ~ "r` ~r` \ / -r~ r 1~ed ~ ~
n~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ti ~l,~/1/ ~
]80 20 ~5 75 f25 15 „ 9S 80 1Q 0 25 25 S 0 ~
1Z45 -~-'-t`y 11B$ ~j t55 115 100 i145 15 0 10 j ~ 160 20 30 15 NOT TO SCALF
~ 5
~ ~5 0
15 15 30 ~ g p 10
' a Q
~ ioo O
T ~
30 3d ~ ~
t a ~o s r~ ~o ,o ~ ~ ~ s ~
~ w ~
w ~ ~ ~
Wp~ ~ W CC
W
~
~ sEeaNO ►~vE.
~ ~ ~
~a
2s s~o aa ~ 15
~
I
- Fou~ ~vE. ~
a
25 15 335 5
aa
FIG~~~ 4
FIGUI
19~89 P.M. PEEJIKK f F]~TRANC4ENGIM~ERS! INC, A. PEAK HOUR rr~ ►#r A tV ~A C' M -r4 z .
TURNfNG ~O11~M -
• r .01 6 . ^ • ' , ' , , ~ ~ .
, tTable 1
Intersection Leve1 of Service Summary
Existing Condltlons 1991
P.M. Peak Saturday -Peak P.M. liPeak Saturday Peak
Intersection Delay" LOS Delay LOS 'Delay LOS 'Delay _ L-OS
Sptague Avenue/Felts 11.1 B 11.2 B; 12.3 B 12.9 'B
Road Extension
Sprague- Avenuel 26.8 D 35.1 D 35.7 D > 60 F
University, Road (312) (D)
Sprague,Avenue/' N!A D N/A D/,E 4.5 A 5:7 B
Gillis Road"
Univers,~ty Roa;d/ 6.7 8 7,5 g7,,1, g 7,8 g
Broadway Auenue `
U,niversity Roadl
Fourth Avenue~ NA C!D N/A B/C N/A E NIA D!E
' Delay measured~in seconds per vehicle., ,
° Tlie Sprague AvenueJGillfs, Road and University RoadlFourtN Avenue °intersections are currently. unsignalized. The LOS -is for the stop
cantrolled approaches. See the appendix for a discussion of level of,°service for unsignalized intersections.
Denotes level of-,servicw with°,1mitigati'on.
. z
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
The total trips generated by the expanded mail and dhe net increase in trips from the
existing mail are shown in the table below.
Table 2
. Trip Generation Estimates
Peak Hour Daiiy
Total TriQs Net Increase Total TriQs Net Increase
' Averaqe Weekda}►,
Driveway Trips 2,910 1,644 32,412 17,079
Net Trips (with 2,226 1,411 25,094 15,219
240/o reduction)
.
SaturdaX
. Driveway Trips 3,736 1.799 39,652 19,116
' Net Trips (with 3,181 1,806 34,367 19,786
• 15% reduction)
_ 1991 P.M. Peak Hour
~ The traffic generated by the expanded mail will be approximately 173 percent greater
than the traffic generated by the existing mall. This represents an increase in the p.m.
peak hour of 1,411 vehicle trips over the exisang mail traffic. The p.m. peak hour brip
disVibution is shown in figure 5.
Other than the University Road/Fourth Avenue intersection ihere will be no deterioration
in the tevel of service from exisdng conditions (table 1 and figure 6). The Fourth
Avenue approaches at University Road were determined to operate at LOS E during
the p.m. peak haur. The primary reason for this adverse impact is the relatively heavy
northbouncUsouthbound volumes created by the increased number of mall trips from
the south. At the Sprague AvenuelGillis Road intersection, the level of senrice will
aclually improve to A with the installation of a signal by the Couniy in summer 1989.
The mall access driveways were analyaed as unsignalized intersections. The access
driveway to the east of Raymond Road on Sprague Avenue was analyzed as a right-
in/right out only driveway. All other driveways were considered to have full access.
The onty location having an unacceptable level of service was the driveway on
University Road ihat will serve ihe large parking structure on the east side of the site.
A level of service F was identified for this driveway, which may be attributed to the
heavy left turn movements out of the parking structure onto northbound Universily
Road. LOS values for all of the driveways are shown in figure fi.
1991 Saturday Peak Hour
As previously mentioned, a Saturday peak hour case was examined to determine if the
street system could adequately handle worst case traffic conditions. The only
significant deficiency was the LOS F calculated for the Sprague Avenue/University
9
Road intersection. This problem is caused primarily by the heavy left turn movements
on the westbound approach destined for the parking garage on University Road. The
Saturday peak hour levels of service are shown in table 1, with tfie corresponding
turning movements shown in figure 7.
MITIGATIDN
1991 P.M. Peak Hour
The negafive jmpact at the University RoacUFourih Avenue intersection caused by the
mall expansion could be mitigated by installation of a signa{. Signa{ warrants currently
are not met at the tocation, however, as traffic volumes on the minor cross street
- (Fourth Avenue) are too tow. This problem wi11 be addressed, however, when the
County installs a signal as a part of the University Road improvements (currentiy
F~ scheduletl for late 1991).
For the congested driveway on University Road, the foliowing improvements are
recommended:
1. Instaft a signai; 2. Instali left turn pockets;
3. Provide an auxiliary right tum lane for traffic entering the driveway.
Installation of the turn pockeis is warranted by the fairly heavy left turn movements
from the south. This improvement would also prevent excessive weaving movements
that may occur *between the driveway and Sprague Avenue wiih the exiscing laning.
Installation of a left turn pocket on the north side of the driveway would benefit the
i commercial development on the east side of University Road, so that this improvement
may be coordinated wiih the neighboring property owners.
The auxiliary right turn lane will be needed to accommodate the heavy p.m. peak hour
volumes accessing the site frorn the Sprague Avenue/University Road intersecaon.
This lane could be located on the mall property and therefore shoutd be incorporated
in the final site design.
~ 1991 SaturdaM Peak Hour
To address the LOS F condition at the Sprague Avenue/University Road intersection, it
is recommended that an additional teft tucn lane be constructed on the westbound
Sprague Avenue approach. It appears that this can be done within the existing cross
section because the raised concrete turn pocket on this approach is 21 feet in width.
This would allow for 10' and 11' turn tanes or two 11' tum lanes if an additional foot
could be °shaved" from the oiher lanes.
A second improvement that shoutd be considered at Sprague Avenue/Univeristy Road
for the future Saturday peka hour is the addition of a right-turn-oniy lane on
. noRhbound University Road. This wilt allow the through and right turn movements io
remain at an acceptabte levef of service.
With both of the above improvements, the existing level of service D at Sprague
Avenue/University Road can be maintained.
12
~E~U ~rrcv,~r~., s `~yu~r o ~ ~u 0dUJJ--'G ( t uv+ t,+vru
~
' ~ ~z
~
~
eRO~awAY av~. +x ~ ~
BA~FOUR ROAD RAYMOND R~AD 1 _
~ 2~ ~ ~
GILLIS R~AD I
' SPRAGUE AVE.
~x ~ ~x sx ~ ex
~7i 4JG ~ 21 ~
~ 't' \ ! ~ ! ~ ~ ~
Z~i ~ y ~ / ~ ~i ,
~ ♦ z~ac ~ r ~ ~ ~sz ax ~
~ a4x 2z u ~s i~x 2z~~~c ~ ~x~~
NOFT Ti0 SCAE.E
0
~ a
~ Bx ~ z~ o~
~
~c ~ . ~
~ s~car~o nv~.
,~x
~
~
~
~
F~u~ av~,
? 99 ) PR~J~CT F ENTAANCO Et~GINEERS, INC,
TR F"iGURE 5
'ROJEC7 P.M. PEAK HOUR
TRlP DIS"C'RiBUT1ON ~
- - HI.rW l.:~rf~U~lc~.i:~`~tiW~.+-u, ti~ oyu.~.+-u, y+r•..u.o la %,,,f Af 6+.0
1
~ ~ 1~ 160 f~ ~ 31~
~
eRO~wa~r ~v~. E.
BALfOUR R~A[) RAYMOND RQAO ~QS 8 ~o
~ ~ ~1a ~i~ s~
~
GII~1S ROAD , -
° SRRAGUE AVE.
~s o LOS D , LOS 8 ,7s o 4 g~g 18 1S 50 ~ 898 ~5 a~ 5 ~@SS 1Q5 i55 125 5 0 ti~
&~0 r~• 1 Z~0 _ ~ ~ ~
~7p ~ ~4~ , y -r ,r 4 ia~o ,2.m _ • ~
~x~ ~ t~a~
' ~so 20 ~a ~ ~ -
~ ~s z~s ~a i~ . w 12~s ~ ~o is ~s ~z~s ~ ~o ~s ~s >>ya ~ i~o i~s z~o ~ ta
ts~ ~
'4 ~.C~S * I.DS ~ ' D
~
~ ~.OS A ~ ~
3?0 Z35 i~o ~
0
LOS A ~ LOS F' ac
3 24S
~ Z75 1x5 ~90 ~ _ >
~os a
~ sE~ o~a av~. ~ ~,s I
95
~ 12S
14
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 S L~~ I
~
~ Fau~t ~►v~.
~o
Los ~sa~as
za ~ - APPLI~S TO I~~
~PPRaA~H QN~ ES TO IDENTJf7ED 7%nru nKrI v f f~~i=2 J t° . '
199) FIGVRE 6
EfiTHANCO ENGiNEERS~ 1NC. TUR 1991 P.M. PEAK HOUR
TURNING MOVENlENTS ~
, l~.liU 4a.~P~1VUG41J~U`J11JJs~7) rL I`J~IJ.I"1.F) ~LI+1.u.~V lIr ~1! vJ
~
15
~ 20 150 tQ C~" 2b~s
~
ea~oua Ra~o ~aY~oNa Ro~o LOS B tg
~ ~ x~ ~2~ isa ss ~
~~o GIWS R4A0
SP G RA U~ AVE. L4S F I I
L(~S B 7o x~ ~ 1125 IOi 234 169 ~ 0 15 1575 75
~ ~ 75 ~p ]5
`T rn r
~ 127Q
~ ` 36tl 155 3~
?~'S3 35 t~ ~y t~s i~o aas ~7ss ~ io o ~n
eo ~s
D
a 0
~ Q ~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
s~cor~a a~,
~
~n~~ ~xo
L4S D~ ~o
FOl1RTH A1f~.
ro
L05 ~y ~ za sss 1a
* - APPLI~S TO fQEI tis
A~PPROA~H DN~1 :S TQ IOENT1FlED
ArN nNi Y
1991 SATU~ ~ EMRMit~O ENGIN~ERS~ 1NC. FIGURE 7
TUF~P 91 SATURDAY PEAK H4UR
TURN1NG MO'VEMENTS ~
s
APPENDIX
LEVEL C)F SERVi'CE CO'NGEPT
-
g
~
,
.
LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT
Because intersection capacity and traffic flow performance, or "tevel of service
are prime factors in the alternatives development and evaluagon process, a brief
description is presented here for the benefit of the !ay reader.
The ratio of exisdng tratfic volume to availabte capacity provides a measure of
intensity of traffic loading relative to the abitity of the street intersection to
accommodate the traffic. The number of lanes, presence of tum lanes, type of uaffic
control, signal phasing, etc., are important capacity determinants. As the
volume/capacity ratio (v/c) approaches a value af 1.0, extreme congestion sets in. with
long backups at signalized intersections and the passage of several complete
changes of the signal cycles before a motorist can proceed. Motorists at stop-sign
controlled intersecfion approaches face extremely long delays. This congestion can
• also impede access to and from upstream abutting property as traffic queues
lengthen.
The term "level of service" is used to describe intersection traffic flow
performance and for signalized intersections is essentially based on v/c ratios (see
Table A-1
Table A-1
Traffic Level of Service and
. Volume/Capacity Ratio Relationships
for Signalized Intersecaons
' Level .
Intersection of General Descripdon
V/C Rado Service (Siqnalized Intersections)
Under 0.60 A Free flow
0.61 to 0.70 B Stable fiow (stight delays)
0.71 to 0.80 C Stable fiow (acceptable delays)
0.81 to 0.90 D Approaching unstable flow
(tolerabte delay occasionally
wait through more tfian one signal
cycle before proceeding)
0.91 to 1.04 E" Unstable flow (intolerabte delay) -
capacity
Over 1.00 F Forced flow (jammed)
Source: Transportation Research Board Circular 212, "Interim Materials on
Highway Capacity".1980.
A - 1
.
.
. Level of service "A" is a condidon of unimpeded flow. while level of service "C" is
often used in tlhe design of new urhan streets as the lowest acceptable levei for peak
periods. Congestion begins to occur at level of service "D" (v/c from 0.81 to 0.90).
Because of funding and/or environmental constraints for improvements, this level of
service is being used by more cides as an adequate level. particularly for
improvements to congested existing facilities. Increasingly unstable traffic fiow with
excessive delay and congestion occurs as level of service "E" (capacity) is
approached (v/c = 0.91 to 1.00). For v/c > 1.00, level of service "F °(forced flow) is
obtained, and the intersection is overloaded or is jammed due to tiraffic backups from
overloaded downsMeam intersecOons. Tabte A-2 shows daily traffic volumes
corresponding to peak-hour levei of senice C. D, and E(capacihr) applicable to
roadways of various numbers of lanes and configurations.
Tabie A-2
Guidelines for Relating Average Weekday Daily Traffic Volumes
to Peak-Hour Level of Service for Suburban Arteriais of
Various Roadway Lane Configurafions
Daily Two-Way
Traffic Volume for
Various Levels of Service"
o Total Level of
Number Level of Level of Service E
of Lanes Lane Configuration Service C Service O (GaQacitv)
2 Two Lanes 8,000 10,000 11.000
3 Two Lanes with Lett
Turn Lane 12,000 14,000 16,000
4 Four Lanes 20,000 22.000 24.000
5 Four Lanes with Left-
a Turn Lane 24.000 26,000 30.000
6 Six Lanes 27,000 30.000 33.000
7 Six Lanes with Left-
Turn Lane 30,000 35,000 38,000
' The vulumes represent maximums for the daily volume that wiil result in
levels of service indicated during peak hours.
Mod''ied by Entranco Engineers from originaf source: °Crossroads Study and
. Subarea Plan". by City of Bellevue Pfanning Department, June 1979.
A - 2
tt shoutd be noted that equal v/c ratios at several locations do not necessarity tndicate
equal overall performance of intersectllons since one tocation may experience a high
v/c ratio for a considefabie period of the day while at another the peak period is af
short duration. In addition, a low level of service is rnore tolerable at a low•volume
intersection than a high-volume locaaon.
Capacity analysis for two-way stop intersecUons is based on the assumption that
major street tratfic is not affected by the minor street movements, and left•tums from
the major streets to the minor streets are inAuenced only by opposing major street
through flow. The level of service calculated tor twaway stop intersections are
therefore only for all movements on the minor street and left-tum movement on major
streets. The genefal level of service concept also holds for stop-sign-controlled
intersecdons, although the capacity of the stap-sign-controlled approaches is Iess
than that of the signalized intersecOon approach. Table A•3 shows ihe tevel of
service criteria for unsignalized lntersections.
Tabte A-3
Level of Senrice Criteria for Unsignalized intersecdons
Reserve Capacity Level of Expected Oetay to
(PCPH) Service Minor Street Traffic
_ 400 A Litde or no delay
300-399 6 Short uaffic detays
200-299 C Average traffic delays
100-199 D Long traffic delays
0-99 E Very long traffic delays
= F ~
' When demand votume exceeds the capacity oi the lane,
extreme delays will be enc:ountered with queuing which may
cause sever cortgestion aff+ecting other traffic movements in the
intersection. This cond'idon usuaify warrants improvements to .
dle intersection.
Source: Transportation Research Board Special Repon 209, "Highway
Capacity Manuat". 1985.
a-3
• ,
~
ENTRAfVCO ENGItVEERS, INC.
LET7'E~i OF 0 ~KE WASNINQTCN PAAK BUILOINO (gpg)g~_~gpp
5808 LAKE WASMINQTON BOLlLE11AR0 N.E. FAX.'ms), 827,-T338
KIRKLANp, WqgMINOTON
jX TRAN,SM/TTAL D MEMORAIVDUM ~ -
0 518 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAt BANK BUILDING (Z0M258.OI02
-ENVFiETT. WA9HINOT6N,98M1
To: ~ge • Date: ~OI fv~E~
t~tJ.~ ' C1b ~s~SI 2c6
.
1~-~, Project No:
Title:.~.~s • - j~' C-X PIU4 -t c vi
rn Attention:-a" Re:
ATTACHED o OAIGINALS ` I
~ ~ 'UNDER~~BEPARAtE COVEji O RqINT8 O OTMEA ~ ~
_
FOR YOllit'• o INFORMATIONNSE ~AS iiECUE9TBD Q OTHER
OiJR o REVIEWEO; 'o NOT, ApPRGVEO,
ACTION: o APPROVED ic 8EE'REI4~ARKS a'OTHER
REOUESTEO o APPAOVAL 'a MAKE,CORRECTIONS NOTEO,
AC7iQN: e REVIEW d COMMErT a`RBVISE Q RIE9UBblIT 01'O,THER _
NO.OF DRAWING
COP1E8 NUMBER DE3CRIPTION _
Remarks-
f. ~ -
By: - es ~ cc: -
,013TRIHUTION White to Addresaee - Canary.to Project File - Pink to Oey File A 02j(2-8g)
.
i
~
, Taylor Fjigmeermg, Inc.
~ Civfl Design and Iand Pl.an~g
~
. ~
.
~ .
AWA w • • •
e~rin Inc.-
or an SJLJLI%,.g,
AWAw rayl
Civil Design and Land Planning Pr„4&:
PleCrry M 7trylor, P.E
Stcutley R StirlLig
Mark A. Aronxon, P.L
• Uavrd C. Larsert, P.E
Assodates:
Scatt M. Bux!►, P.E
Fiank R. Ide, ASIA
Chid Fii anndal Offioer:
Edwui G. Wagnlld
Proposed 1997
university City
Shopping Center Expansion
Traffic Threshold Analysis
Date: September 30, 1997 Prepared by: William White, E.I.T.
Transportation Engineer
~
9 ~ ~1
Taylor Engineering, Inc. M. Tl
West 106 Mission Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201 ~ y
Phone: (509) 328-3371 Fax: (509) 328-8224
72
~
~sJ r5~A~
EXPACEs to-al • vi
108 W. MissEon Ave. • Spokene, WA 9M1-2345 •(509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328,8224
EXECUTIVE SLINIlVIARY
The purpose of this traffic study is to obtain data and perform a threshold
analysis for the expansion of the University City shopping center in the Spokane Valley
east of Spokane, Washington. In accordance with the Spokane County guidelines
outlined to Taylor Engineering, Inc. on June, 26 1997, this analysis was to take the
existing traffic situation and verify that expansion would not unacceptably alter the
existing transportation network or planned Valley Couplet transportation network.
To verify that the IIniversity expansion would not unacceptably alter the respective
transportation systems, the following needed to be demonstrated:
1. That the expansion would not significantly impact the existing arterials or
planned valley couplet network; andlor
2. Unacceptably lower the intersection levels of service for intersecaons serving
the shopping center.
~ In compiedng these tasks, existing conditions were determined, and four scenarios were
derived to describe existing and future situations. To establish existing conditions,
baseline data was obtained for:
1. Existing University City trip generation;
2. Existing University City intersection P.M. peak hour volumes and conditions;
3. Existing University City access peak hour volumes and locations;
4. Existing University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions after
shopping center construction;
i
Using the baseline data and the proposed expansion, the following scenarios were
projected:
1. Predicted University City trip generation after expansion;
2. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
without shopping center expansion or Valley Couplet construction; and
3. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
after shopping center exgansion but without Valley Couplet construction; and
4. Predicted, 1999, University City access peak hour volumes and locations after
shopping center expansion and Valley Couplet construction.
F`INDINCLS-Zo,
University City Mall has 431,900ft2 gross leasible area (including Village Square).
From that, we calculated a full occupancy trip generation of 1,714 entering and exiting
P.M. peak hour trips including remote rds and anchor tenants. The proposed
exgansion of University City to a 512,900ft gross leasible area facility would create an
esrimated trip generacion of 1,876 entering and exiting P.M. peak hour trips. This is a
18. 8 9b increase in shopping center area, and a 9.5% increase in trip generation.
Because of passerby opportunity to internal, remote pad sites, the relationship between
shopping center size and trip generation is not linear.
These trip generation growth rates, in combination with the Spokane County predicted
regional growth rate of 2.5-3.5 were used to set up the series of before and after
scenarios described above. They wene directionally redistributed to adequately predict
shopping center expansion impact results.
MNCLUSInN.t.
The first conclusions involved intersection Levels Of Service, or LOS (See Glossary).
The overall intersection IeveLs of service, used to describe the cagacity and
functionality of an entire intersection, did not drop to unacceptable levels throughout
each of the various network scenarios. (Acceptable LOS is defined by Spokane County
Engineers to be any rating above LOS D for signalized intersections.) Therefore we
conclude that a full traffic study is not warranted on the basis of adverse intersection
effects. 1fie intersection LOS results follow in Table I on page iv.
The second conclusion was that the arterial network does not receive any unac.ceptable
increase in volume as a resuit of the proposed University City expansion. Present
access locaaons will remain the same. Valley Couplet accesses were assumed to be
negotiated, and reasonably limited.
The compledon of the Valley couplet will bring substantial traffic volume improvement
for the transportation network surrounding University City. The addition of one way,
east bound, Second Avenue, and the conversion of Sprague Ave. to one way, west
bound will increase eastbound lane capacity by about 25 and westbound lane
capacity by about 40 not including the high occupancy vehicle lanes. The split
i;
couplei will also dramatically decrease the number, of conflicting movements in,,the
- University City, azea. This further increases, capaciry and safety for the east-west
arterial network.
Based ,upon -the,findings and, conclusions of this threshold study, a full traffic study .is
not,required for the .proposed University, City„ ezpansion. The proposed University City
,expansion will not generate sufficierit traffic `increase `to exceed 5 90 , of available
Gapacity with, complete build-out with the, surroundiclg existing network. Further,, the
[,shopping center-will ber substantially better accommodated 'following construction of the
Valley Copplet.
Rggommend i •
' `Building, perinit application process be allowed to proceed forward wifhout further
traffic analysis.
iii
Table I: LOS Intersection Scenario Resutts
Scenario Intersecdon Intersection LOS
Eacisting Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University . C
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Eacisting Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Existing Sprague & University D
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts (1999)
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & Farr B
fixisring counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & University C
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & University B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & Farr B
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplei (1997)
Maximum, Reieveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Bedeveloped Predicted Second 8c University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
iv
- Table of Contents
~Pa~.~.......~~._.~..._....~......, -
Executive,Summary ~ i - iv
Tab1e of Contents v
Threshold..Analysis 1 - 28
Manual C'ount Summary and Tr-affic 29 - 42
Projections
Highway, Capacity 1Vianual-Analysis 43,- 65
, Glossary 66 - 67
~
~
I. Introduction, Assumptions and Methods Used
Taylor Engineering Inc., was retained to complete a dueshold analysis for University
City Mall located in Spokane, Washington. Presently, University City mall, including
the main building, satellite buildings, and Village Square, is a 431,900ftZ gross aeasable
area(GLA) retail mall. It is proposed to eventually expand to a 519,900ft GLA
shopping center. Present tenants will change. New tenants will include retail stores and
shops; such as, a new supermarket, various fast food restaurants, banks, and additional
general retail.
A threshold analysis is used to determine whether or not a full traffic impact study is
warranted for a development. A full study, and mitigation, is not required if the
threshold study verifies that the development will not:
1. Significantly modify the existing transportation network; or
2. Significandy effect the present intersection capacity or lower the level of service
below an acceptable level.
Improvements effecting traffic capacity for the University Ciry mall will occur with the
development of the Spokane Valley Couplet. The Valley Couplet is a new transportation
system that will improve the traffic capacity betweeo downtown and the Spokane
Valley. The Sprague-Second Avenue Couplet will be a dual arterial system. It will
change Sprague Avenue by rearranging the present lane configuration into a one way,
west bound, five-lane arterial including an added high occupancy vehicle lane. The
project will construct a new, one way, east bound Second Avenue arterial with four
lanes, including an added high occupancy vehicle lane. In phase I one of the South
Valley arterial project, both couplet routes will extend to University Raad. Sprague
Avenue will maintain its preseni, two way configuration east of University Road until
later pha,ses in the project. The exact date for completion of the Couplet is not firmly
set; however, the project is a high priority project.
Regardless of scheduling for the comptetion of the Valley Couplet, the owner of
University City wishes to proceed with the shopping center expansion in phases. The
first phase will expand the east side of the University City shopping center main
~
building to accommodate an expanded supermarket. Further phases may, or may not,
proceed before the compledon of the Valley Couplet. That schedule is dependent upon
market conditions and the discreiion of the owner.
For the sake of this report, total mall completion was projected by a rather aggressive
target year of 1999. We used 1999 as a target date for expansion completion. Traffic
impacts were analyzed for the shopping center using only Sprague Aveoue, and using
the completed Valley Couplet. It was presumed that traffic infrastructure which would
accommodate the full mall build out would adequately accommodate any smaller,
intermediate phases of expansion. Predictioas beyond 1999 can be estimated from
Appendix 1 of this document.
The Valley Couplet will border expanded University City on two sides. Sprague
Avenue borders the site to the North, and Second Avenue to the South. This threshold
analysis will also determine the effects that the proposed expansion would have on the
proposed Valley Couplet. To meet the needs of the analysis, the Spokane County
Transportation Engineering Department has asked that the parameters above be viewed
within the context of the following issues:
l. Existing University City trip generation;
2. Existing University City intersection P.M. peak hour volumes and conditions;
3. Existing University City access peak hour volumes and locations;
4. Existing University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions after
shopping center construction;
5. Predicted University City trip generation after expansion;
6. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
without shopping center expansion or Valley Couplet construction; and
7. Predicted, 1999, University City intersection peak hour volumes and conditions
after shopping center expansion without a Valley Couplet; and
8. Predicted, 1999, University City access peak hour volumes and locations after
shopping center expansion and with Valley Couplet construction.
2
U. Data Collection
The following tasks were completed for this threshold analysis:
A. Backgcound Inforaaatioa
Information was collected to quantify exisdng University City conditions. This was
done as a baseline for an accurate projection of future traffic volumes, intersection
forecasts, and traffic capacity assessments prior to the proposed expansion. Data for
this came from the foUowing sources:
• University City Existing Alta Survey (completed by Taylor Engineering, Inc. in
1989);
• Manual traffic counts for existing P.M. access volumes observed August 6,
1997; and
• Manual observation and sketches of roadway channelization, roadway
configuration, intersection configuration, and intersection traffic control device
location and coordination.
B. Existing Traffic Conditions
Existing intersection mall trip generation, and driveway access volumes were required.
They determine present-day University City conditions with, and without, the addition
of the Valley Couplet. These are used as a basis of comparison for future traffic
impacts that the expanded shopping center would create upon the traffic network. The
sources for this information were coUected or produced as follows:
• Intersection tmffic counts provided by 1996 Spokane County surveys;
• Manual traffic counts for existing mall accesses; and
• Institute of Trarrsportation Englneers(TIE) Trip Generation (Fifth Edition,
7anuary 1991), or I.T.E. Trip Generation, for existiag average-day, maximum
shopping center usage (Table 1, gage 1231).
3
, C. Predicted Traffic Conditions
Predicted traffic,, conditions were derived to assess the, iinpacts that the, redeveloped
shopping, center would 'have upon the traffic network. Niost of the data was 'generated from existingf informarion except for the following intersection and trip genera'tion,
sources:
Valley Couplet Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement coinpleted
in May 199,7;
• University City TViaster Site, Plan # Y(current proposal); and
e Institute of Transportation Enginee "r's Trip Generation (Fifth _ Edition, January
I991), or I.T.E. Trip Generation, for existing "worst case" scenario shoppingf
center-usage at'the expanded,gross,leasableiarea (Table 1, page 1231)..
~ 4
M. Project Conditions
A. Background Information
University City mall is presently in the Spokane Valley, east of Spokane, Washington.
Primary access to University City is Sprague Avenue from the North. The present site
is bounded by Sprague Avenue to the north, Dartmouth Road to the west, and
University road to the east. See Figure 1 for location. (Figures are depicted in this
report by a capital "F" followed by the figure number)
University City mall is currently an eaclosed facility with one remote pad fast food
restaurant. The renovation will expand the retail shopping center perimeter west to
vacated Walnut Road. This will absorb the e3cisang Village Square retail area and the
vacant parcel to the west of it. The area is bordered by Second Avenue to the south and
the southern property line of Wells Fargo Bank and various retail sites to the north. The
added Village Square property together with the western parcel will contain several new
remote pads. Proposed are retail stores and possibly a few banks, and/or fast food
restaurants. Access to the new area mainly comes from Dartmouth Road. The
remainder of the new remote pads will be located to the north and south of the main
University City mall building bounded by Sprague Avenue, Second Avenue, and
University Road. Some renovation of the east side of the main facility will be
completed to accommodate the addition of a larger supermarket. Figure 2 displays the
expanded University City shopping center. Figure 3 displays the existing University
City Mall.
B. Project Trip Generation
Presendy, University City is not operating at maximum capacity due to significant
vacancies. The maximum number of trips generated by the facility, or the critical
volume, and the traffic impacts anticipated by the redevelopment were obtained firom the
Institute of Transportation Engineers: Trip Generation (Fifth Edition, January 1991).
This reference is the nationally accepted compilation of traffic counts, surveys, and
5
OE~Co
Afil v .
CivU Desi~► ~d t~d P~arul~ng .
,
oom e .W.,J% _
»cxso~t ~v it ~u~►s,w+s~~ y ~ c.~ ~ ~a a o~
¢Z 1ACK50ll AVE"' ~ ~ ~ ~ i5~~ „'~a i ,~i~ Y;l ~ `~P ~~tnva►~ g
d~ AYE
CARUSy F~E AVE ~ m ~ Z YOKTfnDLER'1 WNSFIE40 ~ AV~~
~ Q
~ s
° ~ u~NittEin ~s ~ x KUOX AYE ~ = S11~tittQN_
+Je 9NA~wQ+i~ a S t4NHON a 1t~IQ1~NA AVB Itt01AHA AYE
<
~raliU ~
RA t
NO 66 ~ ~KpM, emu Ci~~ _1 ~i
J ~ *atd~M « * A ~ a g` tu00it~ g
~ Nn+~J1 AvE ~ ~ ~s Iw ~st~. avt ~rau!*~ ati.~ ~ AYE !m'
~ ~isravsT~►~ +1Ye ~ t • ta~SS10N . a ! ~ ~ rucwe«
1
~ ~ ~ w►xwg! L
gN115gizN IL Y4~1El1~ Si4t0 ~ Med~ed o
~ s Gr1ft y SN
i u~s+.t~ ~ S~HTO ~ ~ ~ ~E 51Nt0 ~ ~~ar ti~
~ ~ BOOIt£ ~ t
1 o ~~•no QOONE ~ t ,►vE ~
~ ~ DESMBt
x~n ~ ElIARi ¢ 9" p BOOHE q ~ S
~ s s~ ~ 1
d~ W ~B 5~ t~ Q" ~~I a 'aWttti~ ~►Q~ ~ oW+,o a~ a.~~ ~ CAtAl40
¢ c ~atl~[lr t E~TAl6~ .
~ ~LAT+ILDA a ~ taTAtQQa`y 0E►q3 IRl,LIGN F`•~'~
>i
I ~ g ~ a~ ~ ~ r
Centeftss4t' ¢ ag~ r~'~ ` I
's 1T Nwtn P
1J ~ uros
gcnssl S BAOADWAY W AVE , svsnK~~o Nw`~ ~ioT a ie j~av~ ~ , ~t~~~ z ~ ~ AtKI i+~ ~ ALKI ouve"l a~
J Q
u
psI ~ oWE ~ M r~ir ~
~ VAI.K1 o A1+u ~4..~ a~ Q o o a i W o x = vAufr ~
~r"r ¢ ~ VALLEt i M/l7 ~ W • ~
~ VlttE'l, 3 w~r ~ ~ !►tiON % t■ S ~♦cr ~ g~ ~ un ~1 ~
1 71L, qSta4 g ~ Yhtl1 2 ~ m ¢ IIA~
$ Catex3E
~ ~ 0 4f1~AL'0~ y
, z . ~ pvE
~ ~
y4E► ~ , r~ SPRAGIE 2
(lnlti£RSNG ~ ~',sT1 ~ ,ss
~ ftonuftt '
g } st 1St ~ <<RST avE a~ is ~ a
A~~ > & j C4ucatto~+ = 3R0 s Q~
INl1 ~q~ aYE
3FD lO~ ~ 2N0 ~ ,`~pp ~VE ~t 4TN
4tN AVE
Z ,tn AvE g e $ ~ sTH cT ~ m~ ~~1 •I .eM
\
!Fh mgAYE
iTM' =
L
. ~ uw 7tw ~
. wo 10 87H AYr ~ o= +1 0
- . ~ 91 N ; AVE
ECL/FF ~ r~ ¢
t 1= ~~wr~av ► ~t ~ 4TN AYE
~ t
• Mik& ClA TM riH • N ~ ~ N V t= ~1 10TM AVH ~'a~ p 11
1 ~ fa ~ a71 I
\
4, ~ • D1S1131.4 ~l HtLLS lot•-~ ~ ~ ° uRsr.r+►r~ ~ ~ ~,rx avE ~ oa~u~~tr ~ ~ 31„=1
I r ~
z a~:•, ~ ~ o . W Moh se~+aa ~ Iin+ Ave
NATURAL AREA a ffi~ sI um ~ve ~ ai (27),~n~
~ ~ ♦ ~a
~ t ta TM -t- 1 ~Sf11 ~~E Elt
0 us 13TM x~ Q~ ~ 15'Hl
1 tH t ~
t z 161H AVE x'
~F~ ~ Q e4 ~0 4~ ~ o m t~tl
*VE f,= 11'4N 11 N ~ + g
ten~ AvE ~ ~ E~em f ~~tN ~ Se~ ~E a.12r.. 4(-~0 q~.&i
'•~t r~, ~R.~pd t t4~,~ n~9~,~ W iW?M
AVEs AYE 8~ S
~A p 19TM Q t 14TM , AVe ~ c
5 ~
{TF{ AvE a ! 20SM
101'H AV iOtN y IAYE
) ~$t ~ ~yR. yN ~Jr' O
, ~ o~ 1 riw rsE~ 2t5T
AVE a rsl
~ Z ~1 ~ ~ J' ~
f ~
riAA AVE
I Aag
oA ) ~ _5 aaI AVE YtEM p~~r-_ i ~ ~ i~N ~21itf A~
:R~ 4tri ri 24TH~ a ¢ ° "!ts =t 25TH
~p~ AYE
1% ~ lSfM ~ !AY£ 1 l = ~ `
~ ✓ ~ r ~r ~ ~ ,~~r, / 2 k I4TN
!7bSM 1 iVR
, ~ . :
~
~
6
Sheet'I
Proposed,Albertson's .55000
Remodeled Retail 1 ..48000
Existing MaIIrA 24000
Exi"stlng Malt'B 15900
Existing Mali'.C 21'500
Existing Mall: D 8000
Existlng 14110E 21000
T
Major Retail 2 1,04000
Mejor,Retaii 3 106500
Existing D'rivenThr,u Restaurarit 2000
Pmposed Pad, A 4000 .
, Pr,oposed Pad'B '5000
Proposed Pad C 7000
Pmposed Pa#:D 7500 ,
Pnoposed Major Retail 4 20100
'Proposeci Major,Retail$ 15500
,
Pmposed Retail 6 8400
Pmposed Retaii.7 ,6000'
Proposed, Fast Food 2000
Proposed,Fast Food%Bank 2= 3000 Proposed Retail 8 10000 , . =
Proposed Retail; 9 10000 °
Proposed Fast Food%Bank 3 2500
512900
Page 1
~
~ ~
~r~.~ ~ r• -
~ . ~ ~ Cj+' V~'~'r-~ • I' -t ~"~'~'r- r f~a1 a r-•-- N ~
.l ^ 1 l 1 y~ I
. 5 + ~ i ~ ~ ~ 'V~.,~ ~
~ ti
. ~F ' ~ ,1 4~~,\~ . ~ I . ~
~ ~ ~
rV+~~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~ y~ ~ ~ 4
~ ~ ~ , , r st,~ ~C
~
i f I
~ y H+
~ P~. ~~f ± ik R r-V
„ ~ ~YOOO~a.~ t 4.7ctl~~i aa^CMf~ +o~. , ` 1 ~1 " " o..~.... ~+r..~ ~ ~4^ ' . P _ . '~~__--r.._...d..~~..~e -r-..~.~~.i~~~~...._.~~~~ Y1..~ u.y.~..~ . ' C • ~
~..~~t. r-..,~.._._i_.= . _ ~ - =+a_ _ e ~ ~..~o~~.~.~~..~.......~.«. : ~ ~ - . ~ a_~__ ~..`~.r-ei1i. ....e.-.~--.`_..•..^ ~ .nr~a--sse~~a~a.....~....~~~ ~ ~f.. 4~. ~..~~~~a'~'~" - ~~^~..~e~~~ a_~ ~-se'-~9 ~n.~..~__ Y -_.:.a;: ' - - - PFtAGU... ~I~,___...____.._ __m_ .+F J
. _ . . . . 4 . _ - _ _ ..~'t _ , . s _ _ _ - L3 , , - ~ ~ , - ~ _ . , ; a.~ ~ I` I ~A A14I1 A~S{- [~~S~ . ~ ~ I ' i . ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ 1 , ~ . ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~/j~j ~ ' I ~ ~ ; ~ . I ~ I 1 d i ~ ~ . . ' f . , ~ ' ~ : ~ ' , ~ , ~ V • Y ~ l ' W ' , I 4! ~ ~ U t ' ' ~ i ~ . i I i ~ ~ ~ • ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ 'S~ . _ \ s rf
" ~f~ • , + ~ ~ . ~2'L`f; Z~^i~ . •C"17.C [iYal k 1 C~ O ~ ~ ti"CCa~x + 5,+ ` - • . ~ p. ~r~.~ ~ ('.yryy ,r ' .
. ~ _ .~~i ~ T~~e'~ _ ..~.i~~ ~a~ ~e. ~ '+~i~~'.~~"~~ ~e. , _ pkM1~.r~ . . , •-t~ F'~' .I~ I - ~ - , ~ ° - . ~ ~ . ~ ~F , ~'~+ar1`~ i s ~ _ i P " .:r.: ~ { ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :ssa~i ~ ~,nar~•~~a/ A
~ `"J~2 --.i. k a~ 1 a - - ' c - I i . +a.roa~ . ~ Yi~ w F y ' _ ; , ~ ~ ~ X ~ y • [ ~
• ' .fi. ri' ~ " _ ~ f".~~~" J ~ I - ~ ~ ! Y _ . .s`~,•~ r_ ; , , i ~ ~ 9~~ Tp ~i 1 . ~1 y e 1 ~I~,'il~] `.z~ ~ , • ; :L: • • ; ; - , ~ ` , , "r` ~ ' ~ ~
. x.. r ~ „ ~ _ - - , - i : A~6 ~ ~~~o.~ , ' ~ ~ ~ i~= ii. r' r ~i ; e i . - .T : r; . , ~ . ' .,'~~t~,:~'~ ' f~
' P 4.~' r ~ - i; •iv - ~ Q~i~ _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r ' . 1~, ti+L+....ewt~~..+ d . :I _ . , ~ .~+~~~~~~.~i~.~~~~~r~' b' w y` I r ~ 1+ t-ac.~.~i44 a~ 1 C7~~~ . . ~ . ~ j~` ~ . , . , ~ , « . . i w:r,~rr~rxsr r.rc.4...~'aL
F q ~W~~,w ~,~~.~~.~~.~~.G . < ~ I ~ i , . . ~ - . ~ i '{C CT ~ , , ! ~ ~ ~ f r ' • dCT° . ~j r~ ~'~~y ~ ' ` ~ I • . ~ j ~
f~ e *k :,t? ►4 ;~G] l . a. 11 I"'i I 7 L4!r.q . ' I i ~ ~ q . ~ V ~~~k 'r M~~J¢ NA,G'R w~ . r~Ml I n U I i.~°'~ F I ~'~r~i1. ~ • ~ + ~a~~ e~ t~~ ~~i ~ ~ ty ~ #`~'rt
~ rt..`~'t!f a ~~d~~ ,i " . t~' , aa:~ ~r~~rr~~r••,~`~ • R.~.~r.~■r - i aac ~ ~ .`r v ~ ` Rr.~~ ,Iy~ ' ~ S +~dr+i:~~~l~"' y . , . ~ (w'A~+ar . ~ c ~ ~ ~'i' [~'S"Y{'4..L~.L~'"4. •
6aV~~ . y ~y ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ 'nr y' _ I ~ I ~ a~ ~ - ~ ~ ~I 1~.4'ii1 ~1.a .+'~4~+ ~ I ~ ~,a, ~t~~r,~° ° ,,..1~ „ , ~ ~ ~ ~
7 w o , ~ Ca 'f ~ . k,,,~, ~ " ~~4.~ti} r.M~ji~ ~t!RM~ ~ ~ I~~~~~ M . ' ` ~..f',eL.•.~.~ M+u r~~ ~~-:t~ ~ ; LJL ~ o
i ~.n • ; . . . ~ T~' • ~ ) ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ *~:t -L :'7n ~ r;~t_, ~ y . f .'.I.1~isi.-:.l..~. ~"y'^+a ~ { M~ ~yC•.~~A ' :•4•'~'~ ' ~b~?CG~,1 ~,~t•~-~ ~ ~ . ' 8 . . . a . . `..YF,:i,M_~L_ M R, ~ ; ~ rr ' ~ r ~ ~ rtiroa
. . . ~ , v~ I , , t,'-~ i ~ . . r ; w ` ,l R ~ . _ ~.1 r~ , • +~a:.y +Krxc a ' ,:4. d ~ i 4,:, ti:' t%- 'F}- §f Y..+-, ti ! r.f~,~~ I~i~aca.y. ia`CC~+ # i ~t t~ lt~ ..1' - , ~ s i L`R:~ { .t!w~r + I V ~
. ~ I+ ' ' .r;.. . u ~~r + ` ' ` ~ . r . ~f 1 ~I ~ , ~ .t: p _ _ ,y ! ~ uj
1,ry~1 ;^I ~ . ~ ~~k~ ~t... . S _ :I _ , e. w , . { ~ . ~ . . , . . ~ ~ G ~Y~ , `b- ~ , . . I ■A a~ _ ~17~L .e. , ~ ~ b - l~a~i+.{. ' ~`~.~C~'l^r ~ , •~FA4 ~F.~•j ~ , . . . . . ~ ~ ~ M.
~ - ~ - . - ,.F~~, . _ _-;---r-,{. . ~ / V■ . I ~ .~.~ii~~.~a~ ~ r i.~~i! ~~~~r~~ -h 1 1 . IL,I~ ~ W. .-.3.. ~ ~ ~ f ~ - « ~ . J ~ ~ I ,
- kr`~~ '--i•~ y f~- ~ 1 rl: a. ^-"t"~ i II`.' /;r' T~ 1 J' ~ . , ~ ~ ~ r._ ~ . _ _ _ ~x . _ . , . i : ~ r . _ . d - ~ -n_ - r - _ . _ CL
..4~ . . _ +CCMI> , ..i-~. ..1. e ~L'FSr i~F f. - ~ ~ ~ - ; _ , . ~ . . _ J ~ - L ~4 • ~ a_r- •-y- 7 ' r'• i ~ S - F • , .....r• ...1 ~ ~ - . ~ f ~ ~Y rt r i ' if ~V ~ . . ~tiy ° • ~ .~o ~ I . .i~y . ~.w. e~ _ ~ 0 ~
~a " ~l"~ ~ i. I ~,'i.'iG'~ - w ~ I 9 . ~ ~ ~ ~ c~"`c~• ~ V l~ t~ . ~4, 4 " -y , ` y ~ . ~1 ~ . . .
t~:' ~ , 4 . ~ . , , • ' ~ " ~ • ` ~ f 1 ' 7 . ~ , ~ r
- ~ ~ 9 i , . - , ~ ' 4. . ~ l'~.i ' ! _ n . . ~ ~ LU ~
~ ~ ~ - ~ ` 1 t . . ~ , .ll~ U~` - ° + ~ r~.^ ~ . J . . „ - L. ~ .r r r , ' ~f , , ~ y ~ ~ . • - „ . _ ~ - ~ • . ~ ~ G G ~I A ~ , r ~._..G.7,_.P' , I
, , _ f . . : i _ _ _ . . . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ C~
' ' ~ .Tn•e~c, ~ ..~.1 ra~r y ~ i"'" r.".".',~.r','_`!5=' ~ c~ra , ~ rcc~e~ . ~ z vi
~C_ P~.^...:"~~ T Itti~O~~"~TI~~l; , ~ ~
, , ~ + ~ _ ~ 7or►,~ ~.~~~~v5 ~i.Q"~ 5h , ~ ' ~ ~ L r Y~ iP7a~, ~~4~,~'4~a Fr+r^d~GEG' ~:~t4 i ~
~ ~`1 1 ~ PAR~'+~~ +~~'IL'~ s ~I f F,~O. ~ t B•IN"A
, ~i1 ' U . ~ ~ .._.~y. , ~ , ~ ;1, i ~ r I ~ ~ ` ~ ~ krflRMf4,Y - i•kI+ - y Ir F i ~F}]] A n t~ ~ n t
i fi ~ ~ r r~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ A LE & ,1 f i A I I M[ I w r+. BARA1ERI . . I
, . . _ ~ ' cOM~AXlE$ 177 s.."tr~.~+
J F f~ U R T w ►i,~V E. ' - ~ ~~6l•. Mi ZY:.I
s ,
~y R r 7'~ t I
~ + 1 ► 1 r w 1 1 z ~ ~ P t 3 ) ~ 1~I.~~~~iI~►11I~1 ~ . , ~ ~ • ~ I ~t~~l.l~ ~I~L ~ 1~ 1 1 ~ . ~'~r.~~wr ~
~c~e, r•a~o~-o~ i~r 1tir' 1i+0' fiN' NMl' A
. 1 .
~ I
~
d ~
~
~
}r~ - - , ~ ; - ~
I
~1rs~.{~ + .
~M
r~ ~ ~ ~ I .
2 ~ ~
ry ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ t ~ ~u ~ ~fta~ i'.•r w~ .r . . . . - 1
~ 1 ~ ~ W , ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ j ~ 1
. ~ i u~ 1 , ~ . , ~M1 ~1
.
~ ~ ~ ~ „y - , I
c+~or.s yc „~coe, _ ~ ~w ~ P:~.~i ~ N1T ~ ~11T A ~
~ . ~ " ~M ~ . 7~~ T" ~ 100C~i/ liC0~1 ~p?p~~ ~
~ , ~ . .._.___+L~~_ Yl... ~ _ ~ " ~ " . " . _ e_`_~~- _ - _~:ry , ~~_k ~ w~l . ~ . . _ ~ . - • ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ SPR'AC~U~ y~ - _ , r ~ ~I
r - * ~ - w~. , , » _ _ " - ~ • , r,...... . A1 A2 ~ • _ . . . _ . . . _ ~ . . { , - _ . ~._l - _ L3 ~
~ f „ . ~s~. , , A~ Ad p • - ~ ~ L~ iii~ +~i o~~ i t,i1 ~ ~ ~ ' I'1 ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ( 1 1 V ~ Il~iw~ . ~ ~ u~ ~ii 4H.i~ ~~i i~i ~ ~~~~~~.~C CI k~~~g~ vRMD~L[rr,}_, ~ ~ ~T wI 06-
~ ~1 ~ • Y~tl11'ilM • ~ ~ ~ j _ ~ i I I . _ i~~l• ~ ' 'iJ~. A ~ dy►+b 1 ~ ; 1 4 ~I 1~ vY =0'RnJC~*~Oy ~ ~ ~ ~ , * 1 y ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ } 6CL'x,~ Q h _ . S -e .
' F ' !f 5 ~ ~ n 1 ~ . ~ :i' ~ ! - • " ~ ~~',~?:-^1;~ ~ ~,a~,,.~ P'
'7' ~t' : ~ ~ ' ~ .~t' • ; ' . 7~1 . ~ m r ~ i . ~ - , ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ , ~ t u' 1 'I~'' f~ • - . = - , ~ + , . ~ , ~ pl ' ~ . ~ ;Z L
~ - :1: : L~7] ! ~ ~ - - . ~ . .i o,~c ~ 4 ~ E f '~~~Q~~ '1•~ 1 r _ _ ~ ~ .»'~~~~Q.~ ~ ~ , - ~ • ' i ~ , y' " ~r F: s1. • r , ' _ ' ~ i ~
• ~ • ° _ : . • - _ • ~ ; ' ~ ~ ~ J~.~ ~ a . d~,+,~ ~ ~~G7} ~~'~i ~ ~ / ' ~ s 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ + i ~ ~ - ~ 1 i~'.~ ~ , C~i C~"4".'i~'C~~i~~~.... ~ ~ .i ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~~~~1k.L1r~~
c, p ~ ~ d~~~ia~~~~~~• i -y ti_ ~ h~ r r~ vl ~ ' . . ~ ~ r+a~.~N}~kl ~ 1,' r . ~ : 1' ~ . I i 4` . r . !Pt ' ~ . E ~ - :P CS! ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ . f - . ' ~ ~ N,,,,~ ~ , U+~ p f ~ .,r~ r, . ' c ~ , ; ~ , y ~ 'ti'C; , - ~ ~ ~~d ~ ~N~"+~ . ~ ; ~ i ~ , i !U ~
~':.f7 A'-00~1 ~ a ~~~i~il ~I i~ ~ . •~.ti~J 1~~~ ~ • ~ a ~ • ~ I R^4r_ ~ •CW • • OOGaI ~ ~ ~ „ r ~ ~ p. ~ ~Ir • 1 r . ~ rt~irt~rrr . ~1 ~ "e~ r f9~ r,a r~ t,,r,• k~ ► 7:~~ ~ f r 4 ,~b„~, • ~,-~r,,.►, , ,
M . • ~t - : i~ • e~n wrc • . i ~ U"'~11 ~ ~ ~ , r.~ s tie , n ``~r° u I • , ~ ~i ~i u ~ . ~ ~ ~yt , •~.,..1.~ ws•u.s ~y~°a~~ ~ y ~ 44 P R!• ~j
c~ ci a, n,~~i~~~~ w z ~ ~ . I ~ •~C~~~d~~~.~~~~~~~C~ Y :~w.'!S K,uJQ7~~ ~ ~ Yp i . i ~ ' -F • 1.. +r . ~ + ~rs' ~ 1W.:9Q tlyl L~+[~i! ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ J • ' { . I ( 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ru~ e .`.^{AZ'1 1 . ' ~ .i. ~ ~ ~I1. ~ C~'bM6 \ ~ C•1}W ~5~0~/ ~ 1 ~ ~ .'L _ 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~d'~M~D rw r t~ r :sooc ~ ~ ~
{ ~ ~ _ w ~fi :1~ :1' _ ' ~ L13~~ t~ a•tie ~..s.. !~,'~lSi:Ye 9.c r > =~~~e ~ M~ ~ a = ~av ~ Ko~oc 2ldcxo J~(~._` Naaa.~ ~ ~ F.'~. ~1.,. ~ M~!'!! ~~1~/R4a~4 ~fa1 V4~/ 1 - _L , . 1: ~ . ~ ♦ ~...r ~~e t , OC+CC 11 0 ~ 04
•r ~ ~ r.... H~ `ttM4 . ~ ~ . .1, w-. 1- r ; - f ►~~[s~o ~ ~ ~ . R ~ ~ ~ ,
G . , 1 ' ~ C..:J ~J i~ p d" o ~i' ~~i~ ~ : ' ~ ! ~ - ~ ~ • • . F J ~ ( r_ . - L~nl Ki~. oML~f ~ i~•. ~1•• f 1 ~ i~y Vv'J LL ~
I ~''T ' ~ ~ ~~~..r. L~~~11~IIQ~1 ~L ~ 1~.~~1~~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F'-~~~~rr ~ • '~1"71/~y / Mf•~y^ 1 _ L~ ~ 1~~~1 ~ • ~~1~ r~ ~ 1 ~,J~ ~ ~ . ~ ~`L~I t ~ ~ • v
~ , ~ ►~.11 i w - ~ .i. ) ~ ~ . 1- ~ ~ ..L. 7 I~~~'/'~i ~ ~ " - . ~ - - a••~ ~ ~ i i~. ►i x 1'ac"CSO ~ 1 ~ _ ~ ; _ - f..,~ ~ ~ e~ r~ t , Ni ~..:y.r~~: -~~r• _r_ 'V.~ 1 N MOpO~~ . .:Z. ~ ~ ~ } , [ ~ z G
. ~ - .y._ ~f~ - - , a ~aooo~i I , , ~ _ , 1 •~0~.~ ~ r -11 ` ' ' _ Z - ~ r• . ~ 1 , ~ _ _ . . L4 ~ ~ • ~r ~ , 1 , „c~ _ W - lvh,
~ , . ~ , ~''y T r -fi , ' • _.e.ir.- i ~ ~ . . ~ "~r~ fi 6! ~ ~~~~~~~~~U~ 1<'b 1 II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 ~ ~ ' , • ~ ~ ~ _ • ~ . 'C? 1 ~
• . ~ ~ , . . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ " f ~ ~ . ; C~ . , ; ~ _ . c ~t 60 OL '
. ~ . ~ . p • , ~ ~ ~ , , -ti--~ ~ , , ~ . Q~ ~ ~ . ~p ~ ~ , ,
~ • , Ii ~ i A10-- ~ , ~ j ~ ~ r _ .t C ~ ~ • . .~o ~ ~ ~ : . , =i . _ E G G N D a, - ;'a,tp~'s
' ~ y ~ . , - :s.v.~ ~ Re«nv ~ ~ l.~G','~ ~ ~ r►~ W
r~,+sr r + ~ a. ~ ~noa ~ ~ L-I.{m'r"1.d!uR r1 . . . ~c~ ~ ~ ~ ' w
v ' V' ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ P4Q.~Ei.T INPOR'+~'AYI W, ~
, , 4 ' ~ ► ~ ~ ~ , ~ . . , t`~Y~► ~ TOTA. E. LCiH'5 A~JI~ al.aC'J4~ i ~ 1 TOTAL RAFi+.~kC, FRJV~C~Q~ ~~~i i .r
~ 'e e PAti`'hy RATIO~ 4,1 1 ~ ~ 1~'OC b Z ~ w ~
i ~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~a
~ ~ ~ ~ , ll ~ ~
. + ~ B•W•A
~ mf.e.,loo - •ni. ' /~s+ r It etr. P_C
F O U~R T H a' . V E. ` ~ - ~ . 1 ~00,0iiU& V* Pib i s L BARgIERI Arrfo iicclnr•
CdAfPAN1Ef totet~atr
ydb ~~0 l~olmr, 11 Ia',S1 ` ' ~lQ1~ !!S•tSIY
) r ~ t ► r • ~ t , ~ . 11LI~Z1 ~1 . 16 G`EG 96
~~i ~tX~1 ~ , ~ ~ t ! L1~ ~ ~ a 4 I 1 1, ~ 1,11 1 ~ x~~ a•.~cv~.o. 1"•iD0`-O
IR~ ~ r~~~~~ e.a,. A$ " .
n~r Iua' ~ «,cr ° +ib-1d5 0 ~ l' •
~ mrOff
A=1.~' -
o. -
~ - - -
. ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~~~h tl- ~ a a ,
~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ,a I
~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _~,~1- - ~ f ~ ~ ~ - 1 _ ~ rt~. "r+ T~~~ts,i~/i~L~s~"'~~~su. ~f F W
~ ~ 1 ~ M ~=~~.._.~4~~a ;,c ~ f t u }
' ~ ~ ~ ~J , i ~ 't ' r 1~ ~rt i~ b' g ~ ~1 y a ~ ~ b ' I r ~ ~ ~ I f ~ ~1 ~ o ~ , ~ : r~-, , , . i a ~ 0~9
~ ~ ± ~N * ex~t~4..n~"~,~~ ~ ~.iti ~ aN
~ ~ ~ ~E ~'r'~ ~ { r~•-1•. ~ + ~ z 4 1~ ~ ' . ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ s ~ ~ ~
~ ~ f~~ ~ :L~ ~ 3 i. ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~s ~ .
~ °a , t ~ ~;'1 f~~': ; ` ' ~ ~i ' x 1 • i ° ~lcne i _
~ ~ I~ '~ti~+'~~~ r ~3 ~ ~i I if~. N ~ • , ~ i h , t ~S , ~ i ~
~ ~I~ f r'~"rf ~ '~.I i ~3 li 1Y'~ ~i ~ ~ t,r ~ ~ ' N
~ I I I 1~ ~'~j~• . 1 ~
t ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ' u ~+~i ' ~ tiQ ~ d~
a ~r~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~W' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~:v~5i k . ~ i a etla ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ t~ ; ~ t~► ~ , r~ ~ _ ~
~ ~ f~~~ ' `
k( , ~ p ~ ,i , ' , ~s •;~;:1 , .~c~itc ~ ~ 'n a a i ~ . i / ~ ~~stt I ~
~ Q~'°MO~'' ~~'•--~e'-y~.;+-+'~ ~=;'i~ ' = A ~ ~.oai ~l ~ ~ a~` :a~~.4 . ~ ~a,;~; ` .~i! ,
1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ f'~.~;;; 1 ` ~
h ~ ~t ~ b ~ " ~ }i rt r~ ~ . ~ ~ ~,t~., i
.~1 i~ i~ i l 1,5 i n~ 9~ d ~ I II; . ~ ; ( ~ : I, ~ -.r-~~~ t t~~ ; ~ ; ~ ' ~ t. , ~
~ ~II~ $p i r 4`~' ~ _ ,i ,4~ ~ ` t ~pl
1~~~ ~t~v ~ S' t ~ ` , ~ ' I
~ ~ r ~ l•N ` t Nlfi.~~ 1 • ~ au, ~n°r^" ~ 'd:~==•~ "~~8 S 1 ~ ~ , i" ~ p i ^ .+t g
~ ~ ' P ~ • ~ ' ■ • ~ - 1 ;,k • ~ i 1~ ~ ,,,1 • S ~ +
~ R► ~ ~ ~.,.,i ~ u~ - ~r~~~ ; y ' i; i ~ i t~
~ j i~ ~ 8~ f~ 1 ~ J' ~~,r~'I . ~ ~ S ~ ' i . ! , ti ~ ; ~
~ - j 4c~'E ~ ~ 4~~}I~ ~ ; =.b ~ ~:E 7 ~ ~a ~ ^ . r~~i ~
, ~ ~ I ~ ~ T r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ; ~ ` i r ' ~ ~ IN~~1 ~ f , ~ t ~ . ~
I ~ ~ r~ _ . . ~ ~ews r~', :1~ . .J ~V
iw ' ii ~ ~ aasn ' / ~ :rl ; j ! r jr,~ f ~ ~1 ~ ~4 ~~$ek ~ tl ~ ~a o E r '~i ~ •.tl' {:ii~;ir.~~i~., 1 ~ ~
' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~'=i~f;iiriir ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ . S I ~
rr~ ~L~ l~ „ ~ : . I';1 ~:,;~r:rf,~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , : ~
~ ~ I~ $~i1, ~~!%:r'•;:°8~ t : ;'d j~'?j ~t' ~ , C
~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~ ~ •1,; ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ • , ~ , f ~ 'i~ . ' ~r; : ~ i
I ~ j~ ~ " ~I~ ~ ; ~ ' ' ' . 1 ~ N F~ ~!.{~r ~'!~,~r~• f•r,` r t' , r
I ~ ~ '•~'~1 i ~ i r ~ ~ 1~,~ ~ ~I •~ti ~S:'. • , ~Ir t '•'t•~.'• ' J i ~1 , . I I~ r~+e;,' ~'ts~~ ~ i= r f ~ r I ~
. i ~ ~ O~IOa~ _ ~HU1QwjN0 ~ ~ i , j ~ ~'s~s ~ i i r ' ' ~ ' ~ : ! ;'r
~ ~•r _w+ rJ ~ ri i"~; + ~ ~ d ~ ' ' , .;~f ~ !r~ _
~ 1 . ~5 #rt~~!!7'~q ~7:+~ } : 7: D I '4 i ~ 5'~ .~rr,~P " ulyc~ r ~~rtj, ~,o,.~ ~ ' r~~~~~ 1 • 1 f' , ` ~ ri "
~ ~ ° ~ , ~ ~ , s ~ 1 i ~ ;~J ;'.tiscoF~ r t i r;
~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ Jr ~ ' ~ : ( ~j, ~ ~ ~:1- ~I = f ~ ~i ' . ~ ' ' .I, ~~mn~i~
I _._i_~ ~ ~I.+ ~ : ' _~~~t~c~ ,3,{~ ~3 ' sgo= ~i ~j i s. c r
~u r ~ ' :ertex •1 , ~ ~ 5 ~,~~.C9 ~ ~'I' ~ ,~i . 3, j i ~ i~ f t. i:1 ~ ' ' ~ ~ 't 4
e ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~.,.,ti r f i! ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , x~~ a ~~q- A ~ ~bb ~ j~ a ~ ~ ~ r ' i ~~,+o+c ~ ~ g~~~ .
5~3~~ w '~~5~~:~~Q ~g ~ ' 4 ft ~ i ~ i ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~a f
~ta`~~ i~ ~ ~ 'A ~a~ ~ '~.~~5 ~ . 1 , ~ , , ~ ~~u.~~ ~cR~ ~e~ T Y , r~ ~ * " ~ ~ ~ ~ be R!' ~ e~~~ ~ ~y I, ' ~ ~ ' ; ~ 8 ~ ~ ti. ~ 9 ~ ~ g~~ ~ , : = f ! r ~ ~
p ~ Ie r . egti ~,ti~ e ~ , gr, ~ a e ~ tl
~~~,~ai~~~~~ ~ ~ ' _{c^~ •1~R" • ' ~ n .Kn+ 1 ~dis~'S~ ~~`~~«B~b~~~1~. ~~.8~~n ti~~~s ~ ~ L~- ,ns~+ "~°r~ I n I 3~ E~ .~;~~~~~~~ti ~ 9~a~ ~ ~ ; N ~ 1 ~ ~
e~~~~u~ ~ .~~~~}~b , ~ 1 ~t
$ e~~tr~~i ~s~~~ ~~~~~6~~ rr ~ ~ ~ ~e 1►~~ ~~~~~~e~~~'r d~~r~~~~ ~ ~rh
~ ~n.~'d~~`be ° ~ ~~~k ~ g~~ . ~ ~ n
d ~~~~~EQC~u~~~~iA~~~Bi~~E~~~~~~~ .
~ ~¢~o ~ ~ i+ ~ 11
1 ~ h _
h. ' ~ p ~
~ ~ ~ a
3 ~ ~ d
, ~ 4n ~ a
~y ~
~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ~ ~ ~ g~~ a ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~K~ ~ a ~ . P~~~~ 4 ~
Y6~t! a~ ~ ky~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~ a ` • C ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ! g ~ ~ 5rt~~~
~ ~ ~E ~ g R e ~ ~ p ~ pp ~ ~ 7 r r $ F~~ y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ a ~ ~ 3~ s`~~ 4~ : r ¢ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~4 .~b
~ ~ 1b P ~ ~ ~ ~4~ ~ In ts ~ ~5 S ~ ' • ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ Y r ~ ~I~~ ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G g~~" : ti c ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ` " "
a ` ~ ~ ~ k ~R~~ e~~ e~~ ~K ~~~7 ~ e ~ r ~ - ~ ~ ~r a ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ Y1s „ ~ .
G~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~~, p~~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~j ~ > Q
i 4'F p C S . ~ G e s o ~ ~~@ p~ t ~ ~ ~ n 3 ` ~ A ~ :f' . ke~ p~ 9 ~ ~ea g ~ ! ~ ~~ra.,~ o*~ a• ~ ~ 4 ~ s ;
: ~e~~~r t`q~r ~ ~ 1 v~a~~~~s ~ ~ ' ~ : ~ ' s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ q F el~ ~ t ~ i f ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~6~~
,e~~~~~ ~,p~~~~ a . ~ ~ a .
~ ~~a~~~ ~ • ~~sQ ~ ~ ~ a~r~! ~ ~ ~7a~ ~ ~r ~~~s ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~
~ ~ ; ~Y~~
r
,
1
'
, historical data that give expected trip generation for land uses based upon factors such as
gross leasable area, number of employees, occupied rooms, etc..
Trip generation for the shopping center is based upon the average P. M. peak hour
(evening rush-hour) in the day. The P.M. peak may or may not be the shopping centers
highest production of trips in the average day. It is, however, the time for the highest
potential conflict between work trips and shopping trips. Report analysis is also based
upon the average ti me of the year. Christmas is always the peak season for shopping
center. Because shopping trips are discretionary and work trips are not, average
generation rates will be used to assess shopping center impacts.
The maximum current trip generation of University City mall was based upon the
existing 431,900ft2 of gross leasable area(GLA). GLA is all of the total floor area that
is designed for tenant occupancy and client use(Trip Generation, 1991). The total area
includes the enclosed portions of the mall, the attached portions of the mall, and the
remote pad areas of the mall. It does not include hallways and non-leasable space.
' The maximum trip generation for the expanded mall was based upon 512,900ft2 GLA.
This total area includes the existing enclosed portions of the shopping center, the
redeveloped attached portions of the shopping center, and the additional remote pads to
the shopping center. Trip generation statistics will be calculated for the mall as a whole.
Pass by trips for remote pads are accounted for in the selected hourly trip rate table
used from the I.T. E. Trip Generation reference. Tenant types depicted are possible
tenants only. Specific tenants have not been identified, nor contracted.
At present size, the trip generation produced by the mall was 1,714 trips for the P.M.
peak hour. After the shopping center is redeveloped, there would be an estimated 1,876
P.M. peak hour trips produced. These numbers were obtained by pro-rating
' information provided in the I.T.E. trip generation. This created a 9.5 percent increase
in tnp generation created by the shopping center expansion. Tnp Generation
information is displayed below in Table 1. Figures 2 and 3 from before depict the area
differences of University City before and after.
Table l: Trip Generation for Existing and Redeveloped Universitv CitY
Size Entering Leaving Total
Existing University City 431,900ft` 771 trips 943 trips 1714 trips
Redeveloped University City..,'-- 512,900ft2 844 trips 1032 trips 1876 trips
Net Increase 18.8% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5%
~ •
5 ✓A R.~
Sp.L ~rIU~ ~oR?A D -
g
-
~T-
1
C. Pcoject rip 1)istributioa
' The existing trip distribution is established using current traffic movement patterns.
These tendencies wete determined by examination of traffic patterns derived from
manual counts. For instance, existing eastbound traffic on Sprague Avenue and Farr
' Raad is split, with 1% of vehicles turning south, 92 % of vehicles continuing east, and
7% of vehiGles turning north. This 1%-92%-7% distribution pattern was used to predict
how addxtional eastbound traffic at this intersection becomes distributed after expansion.
Traffic distribution for redeveloped University City shopping center and the Valley
Couplet is based upon petsonal observations and professional judgment. Intersection
distribution is a combination of Spokane County traffic volume growth projections, and
addiCional volumes as a result of University City expansion. These volumes were added
' to exista.ng volumes according to project dispersal described above.
Existing and predicteti access distribution without the Valley Couplet is based upon
present observed directional distribution. Predicted access distribution with the valley
couplet is based upon two factors. The first factor involves the° approximate percent of
main mall building perimeter accessible by access location. From the preliminary plans,
we assumed that shops will be distributed fairly uniformly around the mall building. It
also assumes dhat the shops will be accessible from within the mall corridor and fairly
directly from parking areas. Therefoze, we have assumed a direct correlation between
access convenience and how much mall building perimeter is served. Figure 2 and 3
show the expanded Universiry City access locations. For instance the northeast -fast food
restaurant, the supetmarket, and some of the main building can be accessed by the
' driveway furthest to the northeast on the redeveloPed site Plan. Then theY are allocateti
aga.inst the north side of the shopping center, as a whoie, to determine a percentage of
usage. In this example, the usage of the northeast fast faod and supermarket driveway
was determined to be 15 !o of the entire north side of the facility.
' The second factor fot determining the driveway distribution involves the percentage of
turn around vehicles, or vetucles that traverse using Dartmouth to reach the other side
of the facility. Dartmouth is an on site private drive that will allow through access, and
access to the shopping center. When vehicles wish to access the south side of the
shopping center from Sprague Avenue, they must drive around the entire building to
reach their desired location. This favors the use of the Dartmouth Road access as a
' means of apptoach. Some vehicles would use Dartmouth Road as a means of crossing
one-way, westbound Sprague Avenue to head east. To account for these situations,
20% of the volume was added ta the access perimeter percentage to determine an
appropriate distribucion. The percentages were reconfigured as a whole to account for
this additional distribution. Finally, overall usage of the southbound, Dartmouth Road
access after recompilation of the entire north side of the facility was 35 The same
premise was used for traffic heading east on Second avenue even though the `cut-
thzough' percentage is not as large. This is because vehicles traverse less of the building
heading east on Second Avenue than they do traveling west on Sprague Avenue. Also,
10
'
'
the convenience of the accesses from University Road to the east makes access to the
north side of the mall more suitable. Since there was more traffic utilization headed
' north than south on Dartmouth Road, only 5% of the access volume was used for these
cut-through vehicles. This resulted in a total access usage of 13 % on the south side of
expanded University City.
'
1
'
'
'
'
11
'
III. Existing Conditions
A. Existing Transportation System
The boundary streets and access characteristics of University City are described below.
Sprague Avenue is a major east-west principal arterial linking Spokane City to the
Spokane Valley. The street presently has three lanes in each direction of traffic flow.
There is an intermittent lane providing concrete-protected left turns into University City
' at sgecific locations. Sprague Avenue accesses the North side of University City at
seven different locations. One of the locations is signalized. This signalized access
begins at Sprague Ave. and terminates within the confines of University City. The
' access is a T-intersection and allows a full range of turning movements.
Three of the remaining six accesses allow west bound vehicles to make left turns into
' University City. These three accesses also allow for vehicles to make left-turns from
University City onto Sprague Avenue and travel west. All accesses allow right turning
vehicles to and from Sprague avenue (right in - right out).
'
University Road has three southbound, and two northbound lanes of traffic spanning
north to south with an intermittent, concrete protected lane allowing turning movements
, along most of the University frontage with the arterial. The three southbound lanes
narrow to two lanes after the southern extents of University City. The four-way
intersection of University Road and Sprague Avenue allows for all turning movements.
University City is presently accessed by three driveways along University Road. The
'
access to the north allows for south-bound vehicles to enter and exit the University city
parking facility by way of right-turns. The middle access allows for southbound
vehicles to enter and exit by right turns, and allows north-bound, left-turn entrances.
The south access allows full turning movements for north-bound and south-bound
entrances and exits.
12
Dartmouth Road is presently a lightly used, two-way, twa-lane, north-south conidor
intersecting Sprague Avenue on the southern side of University City. The road
, terminates at the southern University City property line. There are three accesses to
University City and three accesses to Village Square from this road. The two northern-
most accesses for both locations allow permitted turning movements to and from their
respective locations. The southern accesses, respectively, allow turning movements to
travel either direction from southbound traffic. See Figure 2 for existing and future
shopping center boundaries, access locations, and signalization location.
B. Existing Transportation Scenario
The existing scenario for University City depicts the present, 1997 configuration of the
facility without renovation, expansion, or the addition of the Spokane Valley couplet.
Figure 4 shows this network scenario and the traffic movements that access University
City at these location. The peak hour traffic volumes are given for each individual
movement at that access. Accesses are labeled with an "A" and a number signifying a
particular access.
Intersections are marked on the figure with an "L", then a number, signifying a signal
location. All movements allowed at the intersection are displayed. The peak hour
volumes per movement are also displayed.
The adjusted "existing" scenario projected the maximum, full occupancy, volumes
(based upon 100 % occupancy) that could be generated by University City. These
maximum volumes were a result of prorated calculations based upon the I.T.E. Trip~
Generation reference. The existing counts were increased 65 % to reflect the 413,900ft
of GLA volumes fully occupied as determined by the I.T.E. Trip Generation reference.
The new access and intersection volumes were redistributed to reflect the existing traffic
splits. This scenario with access turning movements and volumes, as well as
intersection turning movements and volumes, can be seen in Figure 5.
C. Existing Intersection Analysis
' Level of Service, LOS, is a term used to describe the functionality of a traffic situation.
The Highway Capacity Manual defines LOS as the qualitative measures that charactenze
operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perceptions by motorists. There
' are six levels of LOS ranging from A to F, with A denoting the best LOS, and F
denoting the worst LOS.
InG~ire~~~
~
For intersections, LOS is a function of the volume over capacity (V/C) ratio, or stopped
delay per vehicle. The V/C ratio is used to quantify the working characteristics of a road
or intersection by taking the measured volume of a road or intersection and dividing it
by the maximum design capacity of the road or intersection. The stopped delay per
vehicle describes the waiting time that a particular vehicle must endure before clearing a
13
!
~
I I
+ 4 I ~ ~
~ ~ ~
I' I ~ ~ ~ LO
~ d a- Q =
~ Q 5Q
~ $1 92 ~ I ~ Qf W Li > - > ~
; ~8 ~ ~ ,_.,I ~ i 31 $3 W
~ ~ 4 -E W ~ ~ ~ d 39 34 ~ ~ ~ S ~ W
i26 C] ~ ~ ~ 28 25 ~ U7 a C~ U )
20 36 4 ~ S 14 F„r ~
l ~ F-- ~
~ ~ 36
7 ~1 25 ~ ~
~ 20 ~ ~ ~
~ ~5 24 b7 i5 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 17 ~t~s~ ~
83 247 1 1 5 . ~ ~
7~fi ~ r~~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r~ ~a ~ ° ~ o ~ ~ ~
35 1509 S9~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ q ~ i Q ~ ~ ~ 0
a7 ~ " c~ ~a ,s~ ~ , ~ ~ CO Z
~ ss ~ ~ ~ o: - ~ ~ a~ ~
ti ~ ~ ss ~ ~ ~ ~ 112 P 204 90 ~7
~ 4i v ~ ~C ~ 90 ~ ~
~ r ~ ~ , ~
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,I ~+C~kI~ryf'~+~,+II ~ ~ ~ IV~~: I~~~JL.~ IFf~IY ~.VV~ I,~ ~H~11 ~LL ` ' ~ ~ ~ r- z 0: (A ~ ~
Q ~ ~ov~~i~~rs va~u~ES. , w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~e~s~s ~~s~~n~ E~v~~~~~ ~a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0
22 ~ a~ ~ Ei(IT MOVMENTS AI~D VO~~J~IE~ ~NLY, ~ o 0 ~ ~a ~ V) U~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~G ~ ~LO
~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ U ~ D
' ~ i 204 ~r3 J ~ I ..r ~ . ~ ~ J ~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ f w~ ~i
~ 81 ~ z ~ l f ~ 0 F, G ~ ~
~ ~ , - ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
F~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ' , 1 w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~t ~ ~ I.V 3
~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~
i ~ g + ~ ~ ~ i
~'i i ~
2~
, ~ 1$~ ~ 4 ~
~ , 25 ~ ~
~
j~ ~8 i ,
~ i ~ 0
, , ~
/ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
_ . ~ • t ,
, ~ '.I / A . ~ L~
~ d. ~ ~ t~ ~
r ~ 2~ ~ ~ ~
1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I
i 19 ~ ~ 11 4 ~ ' ~ , ~ 1
~ ` ~ ~ ~
1 ~ .
~ , ~i I ~ . ~
~ , ~
~ ~ Y I ~
~ M ~ ~ i ~ 14
i(f # r ~ 16 ~
13 ~ 7 ~
1 2 , 2~~ 70 ~0 1A tI1 ~
45
_ 82 ~ tdD
B~ ~ - 9 • ~ ~ ~
11~ ' , - ~ 'G7~
- 13~ i ~
I = 46 g - 3 _ ~ 87 32
, ~46 ~4 1 1 . ~ - -
, ,
~ ~ ~ 10~ ~ .,~'~t-' -
7~ ~~a s~ , - ~ ~
1~ ` r ~ ' 4 - - - - _i
e ` GI !,{j R r,
t 1y r _ ~ q~ J _ ~ ` - _
~4! - n i 3~ i ~ . , 7~
~ ~ ~ 1 1 !
~ . ~
~ ~ ~V" _ S~ ~ ~ ~
TI~~ C U~ R~SE 'V~~- NQ . 1~`c ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ t F~ ~ ~ i - r
~ 1'~ A~ NG ~E. t~TS 1R~ Y, ~ ~I~ ~iE E'~ p~L ~3'+~ A'~ S ~ I'~P~- 1~~
QL~1 ,~S . E"~ A►~~ C~ t'~ ~ A ~ ~
~ ~ E~► ~ _
~ ~
y ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ i i
~ ~ ~f ~ a ~y F ~ i ■
~'J/, f~ ir_ ~i Y F M • yl " ( ~ ~ 4t1 * ~ Y ~ 1 F L
~ . i~k , ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I~ s 1 ~ ~ { ~
c . , ~ ~ t/~► e ~ ~ . ~ ~
t~ ~ ~ _ ~ , ~4 ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ - -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ip~ ~ ~ - 1 >
~ ~ . c,
Q ~
w ~
~
, ~
~ ~ i ~ ~
/ T r
1 ~ f ~ t_T I
1
I
' \1
cntical point or intersecuon. For this study, we will use the; V/C ratio, to descnbe the
levels of LOS at intersections. 1
Table 2: Intersection LOS Descriptions
LOS Delay (sec/veh) Interpretation
' A < 5 Little or no vehicle delay.
B > 5 and 5 15 Good vehicle progression with light congestion.
C > 15 and s 25 Fair progression with occasional backups and some
congestion.
D > 25 and 5 40 Unfavorable progression with noticeable congestion.
E > 40 and 5 60 Poor progression reaching the limit of acceptable delay.
F > 60 Failure in the system with limited progression and high
congestion.
' Suurcc: Highway Capscity Menual (Transportation Research Board, 1994)
Existing intersections important to this site include Sprague Avenue and Farr Road, and
' Sprague Avenue and University Road. Intersection counts for Sprague Avenue and Farr
Road, and Sprague Avenue and University Road were obtained from Spokane County
sources. The count are a result of a 1996 P.M. peak hour traffic count between 3:30
' P.M. and 6:30 P.M. done in 15 minute intervals. The pea.k hour is the four highest
consecutive 15-minute traffic volumes intervals for the site on a typical day.
To obtain exiscing 1997 intersection volumes, the 1996 traffic counts were projected one
year. The 1996 tra:ffic counts had been completed for the Spokane Valley couplet
project by Spokane County Engineers. Based upon historical data, they projected traffic
' growth to 2010. By using Spokane County projections, the 1997 traffic volumes could
be derived by interpolation based upon the growth rates from 1996 to 2010. In some
cases, the rate between the respective intersection legs, or movements, was not the
same. The growth rate ranged from 2.0%-3.0h depending upon the movement. An
average growth rate of 2.25 % was. The projections can be viewed in Appendix 1 of
' this report. , r
4 = . . .
LOS were determined for each intersection for comparison with the LOS for
redeveloped University City without the Valley Couplet. This permitted the impacts of
the shopping center to be viewed against predicted traffic volume increases. The LOS
was derived by use of the Hightivay Cupacity Munual Sofzware: Release 2 by the
' Transportation Research Center at the University of Florida.
The overall intersection LOS for the maximum 1997 volumes at Sprague Avenue and
Farr Road was a B rating. The overall intersection LOS for Sprague Avenue and
University Road was a C rating. As stated above, this implies fair progression with
occasional backup, and some congestion. This rating is acceptable according to current
Spokane County criteria.
~ n
~
16 ~
' .
D. Ex. ~sting Arter. ~al Analys~s
' To determine LOS for any specific segment of a principle urban arterial is complex.
Artenal LOS is a combination of the number of lanes per direction of vehicle flow, the
amount of conflict that traffic endures while traversing a road section, and the speed
maintained while traversing the road section. Presently, the Highway Capacity Manual
uses average travel speeds to define LOS. The criteria for principal type II arterials
with free flow speeds of 30-35 mph are follows:
Table 3: LOS Criteria for T,ype II Arterials
Level of Service Average Travel Speed(mQh)
A _ 30
B _ 24
C ?18
D 14
E 10
F <10
Source Highway Capacity Manual (TranspoRation Research Board, 1994
Travel speeds on Sprague Avenue are well above 18 miles per hour, which is the cutoff
for the C LOS. The principles behind arterial LOS determinations are similar to those
used for intersection LOS determinations. Even though speed is the means for
categorizing LOS, there still needs to be a decent maximization of the functionality of an
arterial road segment without causing too much delay. Because Sprague Avenue
currently has a C rating, and LOS D is acceptable, then Sprague Avenue is well within
the accepted criteria for principal arterials.
'
'
'
17
'
'
'
'
III. Predicted Conditions
' A. Anticipated Transportation System
Sprague Avenue, after the implementation of Phase I of the Valley Couplet project,
' will be a five-lane, one-way, east-bound arterial with an added high occupancy
vehicle(HOV) lane in the same direction. This is a represents a 40 % increase in the
directional lane capacity of the arterial not including the capacity of the HOV lane.
Access to University City and the new remote pads will have been reduced to five
locations from the original seven locations in cooperation with the Spokane County
request for limited access. Conflict will still occur in the outer lanes of Sprague road,
, but the number and severitY of conflicts will decrease due to one-waY travel. SPrague
Avenue converts back to the existing 6 lane, two-direction arterial east of University
' Road during this first phase of the Valley Couplet project.
University Road will relatively remain the same with the exception of channelization
' adjustment near Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue to compensate for one-way travel.
At this time, lane allocation and channelization have not fully been addressed for the
Valley Couplet project. Based upon the nature of the high volumes directed north to
reach Sprague Avenue where it once again begins to incorporate east-bound vehicles, we
made be an assumption of two north-bound lanes to accommodate traffic volumes. This
assumption was made for the purpose of the Highway Capacity Software intersection
analysis for situations involving the couplet later on in this report.
Second Avenue is the other component of the Valley Couplet Project. This road will
' allow five lanes of west-bound, one-way, traffic. This increases the current Sprague
Avenue westbound lane capacity by 40 The expansion to Second Avenue will grant
significant access to the south side of University City. Conflicting movements will
occur in the outer lanes near retail accesses on the north side of Second Avenue.
Dartmouth Road will be remain an access for the westerly one-third of University
City, but the road will be extended to connect Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue.
The road will access much of the redeveloped University City as well as carry turn
18
'
around traffic, traffic that wishes to access the opposite side of University City, and
emergency vehicles. There will be significant conflicting vehicle and pedestrian
' movements on this two lane road within the mall property; however, the Valley Fire
Station (District 1) prefers this route stays open.
B. Anticipated Transportation Scenarios
There are four scenarios projected for this report They were derived for comparison
against the existing scenario to adequately verify whether or not University City
expansion would require a full traffic study. The first anticipated scenario was the
redevelopment of University City without the use of the couplet. This took the
maximum (full occupancy) existing volumes and expanded them by a factor of 9.5% to
reflect the change in GLA. This expansion rate was based upon the Trip Generation
tables referenced earlier in this report. This scenario would include any phases up
through complete build-out of the project. Access movements, access volumes,
intersection movements, and intersection volumes for this scenario is shown in Figure 6.
The second scenario escalates all volumes from the previous scenario by a ratio between
2.0% and 3.0% per year until 1999. The rate is the growth rate derived by Spokane ~
County observations and calculations. This also includes any gossible interim phases
until project build-out. The actual rate used for this report was about 2.25 The
redeveloped 1999 University City scenario without the Spokane Valley couplet can be ~
viewed in Figure 7.
The Spokane Valley Couplet will significantly redirect traffic and add capacity in the
Spokane Valley. The third scenario incorporates the existence of the couplet with the
redevelopment of the University City shopping center. The result is a redistribution of
1997 maximum volumes to reflect the traffic trends and additional volumes predicted to
by Spokane County engineers. This 1997 redeveloped University City with the Spokane
Valley couplet scenario can be viewed in Figure 8.
The fourth scenario takes the 1997 redeveloped University City with the Spokane Valley
Couplet scenario and predicts the growth rate to 1999. The premise uses the same
' growth rate of 2.0% and 3.0% per year to predict 1999 volumes. The resulting 1999
redeveloped University City with the Spokane Valley couplet scenano can be viewed in
Figure 9.
'
C. Anticipated Intersection Analysis
After the construction of the couplet, anticipated intersections that will be important to
the redeveloped project site include the Sprague Avenue and Farr Road, Sprague
Avenue and University Road, Second Avenue and Farr Road, and Second Avenue and
University Road. Intersection count projections for the intersections were obtained from
the Spokane County traffic volume projections to 2010. The counts are a result of the
same P.M. peak hour counts used in existing analysis.
19
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - ~_r~ J` `
V ~
~ ~ a ~ FAR~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
° m z c~i ~
~ ~ ~ o ~ J i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~W
~ ~
~
~ ~~~c ~ ~
~ C~~~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~Q ~ ~ m c~ ~ _ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ART~I~U T~ ' ~
~ . ~
~
~
N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r~ ` ~ , w
a ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ BAL~~~R RD,
~a
~ C~ RAYM~N~ RD.
~
~ ~
~
~ ~ m
Ul~~V~~~~T1~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Q ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
VI i ~ i
./ff' ~ ~ 1
~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~/~f{' ~
~ ~ ~
+ ' a_ _ IJ ~ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ W ry ~ ~ Vh 1`..I1
V IV M j ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ L `
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
SCAL~
~I~ Tavlor En~in~erin~. Inc.
~ Ir Crvtl Design and Land Planning• DWN W. 106 Misslan Ave. C K'D ,
Spokane, Washrngton 99201 ;
(509) 328-3371 FAx (509) 328-8224
PREDICTED VOLUMES FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY
CITY ACCESS LOCATIONS BY 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY
(4:15 TO 5:15 PEAK HOUR) REaEvELoPMENT
rnnP A(crS:, n,Alvir 97-079
- +
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ f ~ ~ V, Lr'-
~ ~ ~ ~i ~ Z LM LJ c
i ~
~ I ~L ~ ' ¢ ~ a- ~ - 77
~ i ~ ss ~ . ~ g~ i
~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - LLJ W > LLI
, ~2 19 ~ 36 s2 w ~ ~j • _
~ ~ 4 J L~ ~ ~ ~5 9 ~ ~ d 3 2! W _
a~6 32 ~ Vl C ~9 C~l C CD C7
~3 42 , 4 t6 CF)
42
~ ~ 29 ~ ~
~ l8 L,LJ O~ CL 0
i 2fi 0 W,
19 184~~ ~1~78 263
' 88 164 .
~o.~ U s2 ~ ~ D L6J 0 0
11 ~
79 78 1b09 i45! 3B ~ co W < pd ~
~ $1 i77 58 a 2Q8 ~i ~ i 0 Of 0 <
, ~
' 10 13~ ' ° 217 95 ~ Q.
~ 148 ~ 144 , ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~V7
, r„4 . r~-i G~ w ~ W ~
, ~ ~L ~ ~[l C ~ 40 uo
~a~~ i~~~s~c~~~ cau~rs s~au~ ~u. ~ ~ _ w ~0
~av~~E~rs v~~u~~s. ~~c~ss~s ~~s~~,~ E~~~wc~
OVM~NTS AND IIQLi1~l£5 ~NLY. - ~ IT M
~ ~ _ ~ ~
- ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ C'~ U CD LLJ
z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E--4 ko
' ~ I ~ ~ u ~ ~ Ln
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I s~ LJLJ ~
~ f, ~ ~ f Q w CL >
x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D
~ ^J~ ~ ~ V
~
~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1.3 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
32
~ ~ 19~ ~4
I ~ ~ ~ ' 29
~
r
32 I
~ ~ ~
~ ,
iii
I
~ ~
~ . ~ . G~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e,' ~ ~
C] 5 c'
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _j ;
~ ~ 24 ~
~ ~ 5 ~ cr- w Lii > -
I ~ J ~ , 35 u ~ ~ 4 J W > ~ LLI -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 0 ~ V..~ ~ D CY w
47 C.) ~ ~ ~ U7 ~ ❑ U 3 U `
31
47 '
~ ~ I ' Li.~ ~
~ ~ ~
92 ~ T ~ , 27 ~ ~
~ ~
~ 2~ X
39 ~ ~ ~ 1277 LLJ W r-~
. i 79 -i~
, , ~ ~ 2s3 , e~
,s~ ~ ~ i az ~ m i ~ ~ ~ 20 x
~ ~s ~ ~ ~ D
~ ~c~ ~ ~ ~ , C~~ao~ ~ ~ - . C) >
~i ~ wa~~, 224 a ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ >
' , N ° ~
_ 403 11$fi ~I~ ~ ~ ~ . 404 ~ ~ ~ '0 bID 2
~ ~ , p ~ „ [z, i ~ ~ D > L,O ~
b ~ I~~TE: II~TERS~~TI4N ~~l1h~T~ DISPLAY ~ - ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ 'd ~ ~
~G ~ ~av~~~r v~~u~ES, f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x F-
~ ~ , . ~ i A~C~SSES DI~P~.AY ENT~ANCE ~ z~ , ~r
~ ti ~~~=r ~ A D E~IT MOVMENT 1~~L~~E~ ~NL.Y. 2'~ ~a o~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ I ; .r~ fr ~ 1~ ~ ~ r-, ~ L7 ~ 0)
_ ~ _ ~ ~ { ~ f? ~ ~ a
I ~ +n ~ i 222 ~ ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ LLI VL)
+ ~ ~~s ~ , , ~ ~ ,
~ ~ LLJ ~
~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ '
I ~ ~ z CL
I ~ ~ i~ ~
~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u . ,
~ ~ ~ ~a ~ 3 ~ 1~8 ~ B11 ~
~ 4~, ~ 130 ~ ~ 94 ~ I
~ , I
~5 113~ ~ 120 ~ ~
8S ~ i lB44~
~ ~ 25 ' , 6~9 98 ~
' ~ ~5 ~ 1~~ 483 ~ i
I , ~ ,
i
~
, 4 n
f t ~ `r
~ ~ { ~ ~ LLJ 4
~y ~ :~j a'
f ~L ~ I $ ~ ~ i ~ ~ a-
~ 25 ~
~.L • ~ ~ ~ - > LLJ ~ -
' ' ~g ~ 37 , W ~ ~ 4 J W LLJ _
~ ~ ~ ❑ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 4 ry
68 • r~ ,~y~-} o V ! I~J ~J ~ 0 F 33
~ ~ , ~ ~
f as ~ ~ ~ i ~ Ld.~ W
CL L„LI
~ ~ . i J ~
~ ' s~ ~ L ~ 2a . LLJ
~ , ~ 1 ` ~ i ~ W
I ~ ❑ ~
~ a 41 ~ ~ 1354 ( U.I I.LJ rN ~ J~
` ' 9~ ~ . ~ d~
~ S7 274181 ~ - ~i n~ ~ " ~ ~ V)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 0_
51 ' ' ' 6~ ~ ~ ~P : ~
~ ~ ~ l9 ~ . o~ i p64 ~ • ~i a~ a~ C~ m D y ~
234 ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~-i ~ ~ a ~ o ~,~LAJ
~ 148 4} w~ i° , Q} ~ ~ ~ ~ w~~ > r-L C
99 ~~.1 r~ , < 42Q 421 1236 ~j ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ wl I T i i ' ~~y ~ ~
~ ~ ~F~ 0 ~ " NO`fE. INIE~SEC110N CQUNTS [~ISPLAY , ~p ❑ . ~ : ~ ~X LO
~ f ' W ~ , All M~311~IE~T VOLU~ES. r; ~ q~ ~ ~qCO x~0
, ~5 Q 'u~ ~ m ~ . ACCESSES '~ISPLAY ~l~~AI~CE G~ 2s 2s ~v~,~i ~ 1
1 a o ~ , p►h~~ E~~T M~VIVIEN~ V'(~LUM~S ONLY+ ~ a c~ + ~ ~ CO
u _ ~ •rW~ ~ ~ ~LO cr)~~ ,
i Y ~ V l F'f a 4 ~ ~r~ ~ 0) ~
~ v ,,ry 22s ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Fr-
}~s ~ l ~ Li
_ , , F ► , ~ Li
. ~ _ i > I
141 ~ C3 Z
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~ W ~ 0~
~ I ~ ~ 95~
~ ~
~ , ~ ~ H ,
_ ~ ' ~ 42 4 b39 1~ i1~ U~ .
~ , ~ ~a ~ ss ~ l~ ~ ~ I~
~ , ~ , 120
` w ~G~ ~ I
~~~e~ ~ 2s ~ I ~
~ s~o ~o~ ,
, ;
~os ~ ~~3
, .
i
~
To obtain predicted 1997 redeveloped University City intersection volumes, 1999
redeveloped University City intersection volumes, 1997 redeveloped University City
' intersection Volumes with the couplet, and 1999 redeveloped University City
intersection Volumes with the couplet; all maximum projected volumes were
extrapolated with expanded trips of 9.5%. For volume predictions that assumed the
completion of the couplet, the maximum traffic volumes were again combined with the
expanded mall GLA factor, then distributed according to earlier Spokane County trip
distributions and manual driveway distribution calculations. The traffic volumes per
movement of each scenario are shown in Appendix 1 and Figures 4-9.
LOS were determined for intersections without the couplet for comparison against the
existing University City intersection LOS. This infarmation was needed to verify that
an acceptable LOS D or above is maintained for the intersections adjacent to University
City.
The overall predicted maximum intersection LOS for the 1997 redeveloped University
City intersection of Sprague Avenue and Farr Road remained at a B rating. The overall
predicted maximum intersection LOS for the 1997 redeveloped University City
intersection of Sprague Avenue and University Road dropped from LOS C to LOS D.
This drop in LOS stays within the accepcable range of LOS for signalized intersections.
The 1999 predictions remain the same as the 1997 expanded predictions for both
intersections.
The Valley Couplet scenarios were assessed for this study by making reasonable
assessments of the possible intersection configurations and phases. The actual
intersection configurations for the Valley Couplet have not been designed. When they
are completed based upon Spokane County Engineer's design, the LOS change.
Presently, the LOS analysis for Sprague Avenue and Farr, Second Avenue and
University, and Second Avenue and Farr all yielded a LOS B for 1997 and 1999
maJCimum, expanded University City scenarios. The intersection of Sprague and
' University was at a LOS D. This would be because of the large eastbound traffic
volumes that are wishing to make a northbound nght onto existing Sprague Avenue, east
of University Road. For the sake of analysis, it was assumed that two lanes were
' provided to accommodate northbound right turns. An analysis of existing volumes with
the couplet was completed to show the companson of Sprague Avenue and University
Road LOS. This analysis yielded a C LOS. This signifies a drop of LOS due to
' University City expansion, but not below acceptable LOS. Also, the large volumes
being analyzed were a result of the Valley Couplet project temporary Phase I
configuration, not the University City expansion.
All Highway Capacity Manual software executions of these intersections by scenario can
be seen in Appendix 2 of this report. A summary of the results is located in Table 5
below:
24
~
,
~
Table 5: LOS Intersection Scenario Results
Scenario Intersection Intersection LOS
, Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Existing Counts (1997) Sprague & University C
Maximum, Redevelopeti Existing Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1997)
' Maximum, RedeveloPed Existing SPrague & UniversitY D
Counts (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts (1999)
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & Farr B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Sprague & University C
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & University B
Existing counts w/ Couplet (1997) Second & Farr B
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1997)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & Farr B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Sprague & University D
Counts w/ Couplet (1999) _
~ Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & University B
Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
Maximum, Redeveloped Predicted Second & Farr B
~ Counts w/ Couplet (1999)
D. Anticipated Arterial Analysis
The travel speeds on Sprague Avenue are not anticipated to change. The intersection
LOS analysis from above does show some drops in LOS. All of these drops remain
within acceptable operating parameters. Completion of the Valley couplet will more
than compensate for any capacity loss which would arise from the proposed expansion
of University City. The completion of the couplet will also direct traffic in a single
direction. This reduces conflict, and keeps traffic speeds relatively higher. The same
25
~
situation applies to Second Avenue. There is no anticipation of unacceptably slow
traffic speeds due to congestion. Since the average speed on the arterial will be well
~ above 18 mph, the LOS for both should be a C rating or better. This is completely
acceptable and verifies that no significant adverse change will occur in the network due
to the proposed University City expansion.
Sprague Avenue, University Road, and Farr Road will remain acceptable in report
scenarios with the redevelopment of University City mall without Valley Couplet. The
( total directional arterial volume splits were made the same as the existing volume splits
on Sprague Avenue.
~
~
~
~
26
~
~
IV. Conclusions
A. Arterial System
, The redevelopment of University City will not effect the horizontal geometrics of the
new Valley Couplet. One premise for the proposed expansion is to keep existing
accesses on Sprague and University at the same locations and reasonably limit additional
accesses along Second Avenue. After analyzing the anticipated traffic impacts for the
proposed University City expansion, it was determined that there was no unacceptable
impact to surrounding arterials. This includes both the present configuration and the
, potential future configuration following construction of the Valley Couplet. With these
conditions established, no further traffic analysis is warranted based upon arterial
impacts.
B. Intersection Analysis
As shown in Table 5 above, none of the overall intersection LOS's drop below
acceptable levels. The scenario of the completion of the mall expansion without the
1 completion of the Valley Couplet showed that the existing intersections will not be
unacceptably effected with the increase in traffic volumes. The intersection of Sprague
Avenue and Farr Road remain the same with an overall intersection LOS in a11
' scenarios. The intersection of Sprague Avenue and University Road would drop from
LOS C with the existing 1997 network to LOS D with redeveloped 1997 network, and
the redeveloped 1999 transportation network; however, this is still acceptable.
With the present volumes provided by the Spokane County Engineers, the intersection of
Sprague road and University Road is at LOS C. The expansion of the University City
shopping center will drop that LOS to a D for the 1997 and 1999 scenario years. Once
again, the distinction must be made that the Highway Capacity Software analyses were
made with assumed intersection configurations. Spokane County Engineer design and
assessments of the intersection may well produce a configuration that would increase the
1
LOS. There should also be mention that the expanded University City trip generation
27
~
volumes are small compared to the volumes that are predicted to use this arterial to get
to Sprague Avenue. The LOS change due to shopping center expansion was just enough
~ to drop the borderline C to a D LOS. Again, LOS D is still acceptable.
Because the overall average intersection LOS remained within acceptable parameters for
all network scenarios, there is no requirement for a full traffic study based upon
intersection capacities.
Recommendations:
Building permit application process be allowed to proceed forward without further traffic
impact analysis
i
1
1
28
1 1
i
1
Appendix 1
~
~
~
'
~
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
TRAFFIC COUNTS SUMMARY AND 8/6/1997
1 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION
UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC ICOUNTS AT FIFTEEN MINUTE INTERVALS
, ACCESS 1 ACCESS 2 ACCESS 3 ACCESS 4 ACCESS 5
TIME Total In ~ Out Totai ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out Total ~ In ~ Out
3 30 PM 29 ~ 13 I 16 15 ( 5 ~ 10 2 ~ 1 ~ 1 10 5 ~ 5 2 ~ 1 ~ 1
3 45 PM 34 ~ 13 ~ 21 22 ~ 9 ~ 13 1 ~ 0 ~ 1 15 8 ~ 7 3 ~ 1 ~ 2
4 00 PM 23 ~ 5 ~ 18 20 ~ 7 ~ 13 4 ~ 0 ~ 4 13 ~ 9 ~ 4 2 ~ 0 ~ 2
4 15 PM 39 ~ 16 ~ 23 26 ~ 12 ~ 14 5 1 ~ 4 14 ~ 7 ~ 7 5 ~ 2 ~ 3
4 30 PM 27 ~ 14 ~ 13 23 ~ 8 ~ 15 2 0 ~ 2 9 ~ 5 ~ 4 3 ~ 0 ~ 3
4 45 PM 22 ~ 5 ~ 17 29 ( 14 ~ 15 2 ~ 2 ~ 0 5 ~ 1 ~ 4 2 ~ 1 ~ 1
5 00 PM 27 ~ 8~ 19 20 ~ 9 ~ 11 5 I 2 ~ 3 20 ~ 14 ~ 6 3 ~ 2 ~ 1
515PM 15 ~ 7~ 8 8~ 3 ~ 5 7 ~ 0 ~ 7 14 ~ 6 ~ 8 5 I 1 ~ 4
530PM 16 ~ 4 ~ 12 14 ~ 4 ~ 10 3 ~ 1 ~ 2 10 ~ 6 ~ 4 5 ~ 2 ~ 3
5 45 PM 22 ~ 9 ~ 13 18 ~ 10 ~ 8 4 ~ 0 ~ 4 12 ~ 4 ~ 8 8 ~ 6 ~ 2
s oo Pnn 19 ~ s ~10 15 ~ 2 ~13 2 ~ o ~ 2 14 ~ 7 7 o ~ o ~ o
615PM 14 I 4 I 10 12 ~ 7 I 5 3 ~ 1 I 2 12 I 9 I 3 5 I 3 I 2,
, ACCESS 6 ACCESS 7 ACCESS 8 ACCESS 9 ACCESS 10
TIME Total I In I Out Total I In ~ Out Total ~ In I Out Total ~ In I Out Total ~ In I Out
3 30 PM 30 14 ~ 16 10 ~ 5 ~ 5 7 ~ 2 ~ 5 12 I 10 ~ 2 18 ~ 7 ~ 11 3 45 PM 28 18 ~ 10 5 ~ 3~ 2 5 I 3 ~ 2 11 I 6 I 5 21 ~ 12 ~ 9
4 00 PM 24 ~ 13 ~ 11 9 ~ 4 ~ 5 6 ~ 2 ~ 4 11 ~ 7 ~ 4 24 ~ 8 ~ 16
~ 4 15 PM 22 ~ 13 I 9 7 ~ 2 ~ 5 4 ~ 3 ~ 1 9 ~ 8 ~ 1 26 ~ 10 ~ 16
4 30 PM 32 ~ 18 I 14 9 I 3 I 6 3 I 1 I 2 8 ~ 6 I 2 24 ~ 8 ~ 16
4 45 PM 13 ~ 7 ~ 6 11 I 5 ~ 6 3 ~ 2 ~ 1 9 ~ 6( 3 24 ~ 9 ~ 15
5 00 PM 15 ~ 13 ~ 2 10 ~ 3( 7 3 ~ 1 I 2 13 11 ~ 2 36 ~ 10 ~ 26
5 15 PM 19 I 13 I 6 6 3 ~ 3 3 ~ 1 I 2 7 5 ~ 2 25 ~ 14 ~ 11
5 30 P M 23 ~ 15 ~ 8 6 2 ~ 4 4 ~ 0 ~ 4 12 ~ 12 ~ 0 10 ~ 8 ~ 2
5 45 PM 20 ~ 11 I 9 10 ~ 5 ~ 5 8 ~ 6 ~ 2 15 ~ 13 ~ 2 29 ~ S ~ 21
6 00 PM 23 ~ 10 I 13 8 ~ 4 ~ 4 8 I 2 ~ 6 14 10 ~ 4 34 ~ 10 ~ 24
615PM 19 ~ 12 I 7 5 I 3 I 2 9 I 1 I 8 11 9 I 2 13 ~ 4 I 9,
~ ACCESS 11 U-CITY TOTALS Peak Hour Assesment: ~
TIME Totai ~ In I Out Total I in I Out Hourly Totals
3 30 PM 5 I 3 I 2 140 I 66 ~ 74 Peak Hour Penod Total In Out
' 3 45 PM 5 ~ 3 I 2 150 ~ 76 ~ 74 3 30-4 30 PM 596 ~ 275 ~ 321
4 00 PM 6 I 2 ~ 4 142 ~ 57 ~ 85 3 45-4 45 PM 607 ~ 274 ~ 333
4 15 PM 7 ~ 2 ~ 5 164 ~ 76 ~ 88 4 00-5 00 PM 591 ~ 255 ~ 336
, 4 30 PM 11 ~ 2 I 9 151 ~ 65 I 86 4 15-5 15 PM 608 I 276 ~ 332 RESULTING PEAK HOUR
4 45 PM 14 ~ 5 ~ 9 134 ~ 57 I 77 4 30 5 30 PM 555 ~ 253 I 302
5 00 PM 7 ~ 5 ~ 2 159 ~ 78 ~ 81 4 45-5 45 PM 511 ~ 244 ~ 267
5 15 PM 2~ 0 I 2111 ( 53 ~ 58 5 00-6 00 PM 530 ~ 263 ~ 267
5 30 PM 4 ~ 2 ~ 2 107 ~ 56 I 51 5 15-6 15 PM 514 ~ 244 ~ 270
5 45 PM 7 I 4 I 3 153 I 76 I 77 5 30-6 30 PM 508 ~ 245 ~ 263
6 00 PM 6 I 5 ~ 1 143 ~ 59 ~ 84 .
6 15 PM 2 I 1 1 105 I 54 ~ 51
, Tot 16591 773 I 886
29
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5:15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 81611997
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD WITH WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1996 1 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 2007 ~ 2010 ~
ET 1376 1407 1439 1471 1504 1572 1642 1716 1794 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 117 122 128 134
EL 15 15 16 16 16 17 18 19 20 20
WT 1024 1047 1071 1095 1119 1170 1222 1277 1335 1396
WR 19 19 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
WL 63 64 66 67 69 _ 72 _ 75 19 82 86
NT 34 35 36 36 37 39 41 42 44 46
NR 55 56 58 59 64 63 66 69 72 75
NL 74 76 77 79 81 85 88 92 96 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 _ 59 61
SR 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 10
SL 37 38 39 40 40 42 44 46 48 50
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1 1999 2000 2002 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
E R 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 32 33
WL 18 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24
NR 40 41 42 43 45 47 49 51 _ 53
NL 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
r
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 ~ 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ~
E R 33 34 35 35 37 39 40 42 , 44
WL 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
NR 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
NL 45 46 47 48 50 53 55 51 60
I f i f i f I TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A3 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
,
MaVEMENTL 1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 , 9
NR 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 •
30
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 (SPRAGUE AVE. AND BALFOUR RD.) WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
,
MOVEMENT. 1991 1998 1999 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 14 14 ~ 15 15 16 16 17 18 19
WL 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 15 16
NT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NR 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 17 11
NL 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9
ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
F F TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A5 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7
NR 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12
r TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 (SPRAGUE AVE. AND RAYMOND RD.) WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENT 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 1004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ER 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22
WL 29 30 30 31 32 32 33 34 _ 35
NT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NR 19 19 ZO 20 21 21 22 22 23
NL 11 11 12 12 12 12 13 13 13
ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
, r TRAFFIC PROJEC710NS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A7 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMEN7I 1997 1998 1999 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010 ~
ER 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 17 17
N R 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 31 32
< < < ' r ' -
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS AB WITH WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET ,
MOVEMENTI 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 1000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 1010
ER 1 7 7 1 8 8 9 9 9
NR 6 6 ~ 6 6 7 7 7 8 B
31
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r ~ r ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~■r r~ ~ ~
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND UNIVIERSITY ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1996 ~ 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 L 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ET 1174 1199 1225 1251 1278 1332 1389 1449 1511 , 1574
ER 131 134 131 140 143 149 155 162 169 116
EL 60 82 83 85 87 91 95 99 _ 103 107
WT 836 854 872 891 910 949 989 1032 1076 1121
WR 59 60 62 63 64 61 10 73 76 19
WL 167 171 174 178 182 190 198 206 215 224
NT 131 134 137 140 143 149 155 162 169 176
N R 85 87 89 91 93 96 101 105 109 114
NL 143 146 149 152 156 162 169 176 184 192
ST 196 200 204 209 213 222 232 242 252 263
SR 69 70 72 74 75 18 82 85 89 93
S L 154 151 161 164 168 175 182 190 196 207
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 1004 2006 ~ 2008 1010
ER 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11
SL 32 33 33 34 36 37 39 41 43
, F TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A10 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1996 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 73 75 76 78 82 85 89 93 91
NL 29 30 30 31 32 34 35 37 39
SR 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11
r TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI 1991 ~ 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 2004 1 2006 L 2008 ~ 2010
ET 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 8
ER 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12
EL 10 10 10 11 11 _ 12 12 13 13
WT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NL 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13
SR 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
32
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5:15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 8f6M997
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND FARR ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1996 LRED. 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 1006 ~ 2007 ~ 2010
ET 1376 1728 1767 1807 1847 1930 2017 2108 2203 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 117 122 127 134
EL 15 15 16 16 16 17 18 19 20 20
VyT ' 1024 1293 1322 1352 1382 1444 1509 1577 1648 1396
WR 19 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 31 26
WL 63 76 78 79 81 BS 69 93 97 86
NT 34 35 36 36 37 39 41 42 44 46
N R 55 70 72 73 75 78 _ 82 85 89 _ 75
NL 74 76 77 79 81 85 88 92 96 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 59 61
SR 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 10
SL 37 41 42 43 44 46 48 50 52 50
r F
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~ RED 1997 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ER 25 70 72 73 75 78 62 85 89 93
WL 18 50 52 53 54 56 59 61 64 67
NR 40 112 115 117 120 125 131 137 143 149
NL 31 87 89 91 93 97 101 106 111 116
, MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT~ 1991 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 33 92 94 97 99 103 108 113 118 123
WL 10 28 29 _ 29 _ 30 31 33 34 36 37
NR 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
NL 45 126 129 132 135 141 147 154 161 168
F MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A3 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 L RED.1997 L 1998 1 1999 f- 2000 1 2002 L 2004 2006 ~ 2008 L 2010 ~
ER 6 17 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 22
NR 9 25 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34
F 33
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
IUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CfTY ACCESSL A4 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
JT 1997 ~ RE0.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 14 39 40 41 42 44 46 48 50 52
12 34 34 35 36 38 39 41 43 45
1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 ~ 5
r~' 13 36 37 38 39 41 42 44 48 48
7zJ J 20 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
4 4 4 y 4 4 5 5 y 5 5
T
3~ Vr-- LtAl
1 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESSL A5 WITNOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
=~Ff~
~MOVEMEN~ 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 i 2002 ~ 2004 2006 2006 ^ 1010 t
ER 5 14 14 15 15 16 16 11 18 19
NR 9 25 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34 ,
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A6 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOUEMENT 1991 RE0.1997 1996 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 2006 ~ 2006 ~ 2010 ER 18 50 52 53 54 56 59 61 64 67
WL 29 81 y 83 85 87 91 95 99 ~ 104 108
NT 1 y 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NR 19 53 54 56 57 59 62 65 68 11
NL 11 31 31 32 33 34 36 38 39 41
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 S S
MAXIMUM TFiAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY C(TY ACCESSL A7 WITHOt1T UNIVERSITY CiTY EXPANSION OR VALCEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~ REQ.1991 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010 E R 13 36 37 38 39 41 42 44 46 qFs
NR 24 67 69 70 72 15 ~ 18 82 86 gp
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL AB WiTHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ RED,1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2006 ~ 2010 ~
ER 7 10 20 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
NR 6 17 , 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 2-2
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE AND UNIVIERSITY ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENTI 1996 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2006 C 2010 i
ET 1174 1509 1541 1574 1608 1677 1749 1823 1901 1574
ER 131 167 171 174 178 186 194 202 210 176
EL 80 ' 104 106 108 111 116 121 126 131 107
WT 836 991 1012 1034 1056 1101 1148 1197 1249 1121
WR 59 59 60 62 63 66 68 71 _ 74 79
WL 167 196 200 204 209 218 227 237 247 224
NT 131 141 144 147 150 157 163 170 118 176
NR 85 90 92 94 96 100 104 109 113 114
NL 143 204 208 213 217 227 236 247 257 192
ST 196 247 252 258 263 274 286 298 311 263
SR 69 83 85 87 88 92 96 100 _ 105 93
S L 154 157 161 164 168 115 182 190 198 207
, r r
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A9 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1991 1 RED.1997 1 1998 1 1999 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
E R 8 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
SL 32 90 92 94 96 100 105 109 114 119
1 r r r
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL A10 WITHOUT UNIVERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTL 1997 RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 73 204 209 214 219 228 239 249 261 272
NL 29 81 83 85 87 91 95 99 104 108
SR 8 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
r r < < < < MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESSL Q11 WITHOUT UNNERSITY CITY EXPANSION OR VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 RE0.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ET 6 18 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24
ER 9 25 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34
EL 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 _ 36 37
WT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 S 5
NL 10 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
S R 4 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15
r ' `
35
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5:15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 81611997
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE ANO FARR ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
,
MOVEMENTI 1996 1 RED.1997 ~ 1996 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2007 ~ 2010
ET 1376 1160 1800 1840 1881 1966 2055 2147 2244 1875
ER 98 100 102 105 107 112 117 122 128 _ 134
EL ' 15 15 16 16 16 17 18 19 20 20
VYT 1024 1318 1348 1378 1409 ' 1472 1539 1608 1680 1396
WR 19 25 26 26 27 28 _ 29 30 32 26
WL 63 78 80 82 83 87 91 95 99 86
NT 34 35 36 36 37 39 41 42 44 46
NR 55 75 77 78 80 84 68 91 96 75
NL 74 76 77 79 81 85 88 92 96 101
ST 45 46 47 48 49 51 54 56 59 61
SR 7 1 1 7 8 8 8 9 9 10
SL 37 44 45 46 47 49 51 54 56 50
F MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY QCCESS A1 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOUEMENTI 1997 1 RE0.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 2004 2006 2008 2010 E R 25 78 79 81 83 67 90 95 99 103
WL 18 56 57 58 60 62 65 68 71 74
NR 40 124 127 130 133 139 145 151 158 165
Nl 31 96 98 100 103 107 112 117 123 128
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTL 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1996 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 ~ 1004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 1010
ER 33 102 105 107 109 114 119 125 130 136
WL 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
NR 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
NL 45 140 143 146 149 156 163 170 178 186
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A3 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTF 1997 1 RED.1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 1004 1 2006 1 2008 2010
ER 6 19 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
NR 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
r , , r 36
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ RED.1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
E R 14 43 44 45 46 48 51 53 55 58
WL 12 37 38 39 40 42 43 _ 45 47 50
NT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
NR 13 40 41 42 43 45 _ 47 49 51 54
NL 7 22 22 23 23 24 25 26 28 29
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
F MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A5 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 1002 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010
ER 5 16 16 16 17 17 18 19 20 21
NR 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 31
F , F ,
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOYEMENTL 1991 1 RED.1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 2004 2006 1 2008 2010
ER 18 56 57 58 60 62 65 68 71 74
W►l. ~ 29 90 92 94 96 100 105 110 115 120
NT 1 4 4 4 4 4 S 5 S 5
NR 19 59 60 62 63 66 69 72 75 78
NL 11 34 35 36 36 38 40 42 43 45
ST 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
F MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANOED UN(VERSITY CITY ACCESS A7 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 ~ RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 1000 ~ 2002 ~ 1004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
E R 13 40 41 42 43 45 47 49 51 54
NR 24 74 76 78 80 83 67 91 95 99
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A8 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 RED 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 1002 1 2004 1 2006 L 2008 2010
ER 7 22 22 23 23 24 25 26 28 29
NR 6 19 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
`
37
r~r ~r r~r ~ r~r ~r ~ ~r ~ r ~r r~ rr r~r
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVENE ANO UNIVIERSITY ROAD WITH EXISTING LAYOUT
MOVEMENT 1996 ~ RED.1991 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ET 1174 1542 1575 1609 1643 1713 1787 1863 1943 1574
E R 131 170 174 177 181 189 197 205 214 _ 176
EL SO 105 107 110 112 _ 117 122 127 132 107
WT 836 1007 1029 1051 1073 1119 , 1167 1217 , 1269 1121
WR 59 59 60 62 63 66 68 71 74 79
WL 167 199 203 208 212 711 231 240 251 224
NT 131 142 145 148 151 158 165 172 179 176
NR 65 91 93 95 97 101 105 110 115 114
NL 143 208 212 217 222 231 241 251 262 192
ST 196 252 257 263 269 280 _ 292 305 318 263
S R 69 84 86 88 90 93 97 102 106 93
SL 154 157 161 164 168 115 182 190 198 207
r r I
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTJ 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
ER 8 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33
SL 32 99 101 104 106 111 116 121 126 132
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A10 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
MOUEMENTL 1997 ~ RED.1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 1008 2010 ~
E R 73 226 231 237 242 253 264 276 288 301
NL 29 90 92 94 96 100 105 110 115 120
S R 8 25 25 26 27 28 29 34 32 33
MAXIMUM TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITHOUT VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI 1991 1 RED 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 1 1000 ~ 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
ET 6 18 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24
ER 9 28 29 29 30 31 33 34 36 37
EL 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
WT 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 _ 5
NL 10 31 32 32 33 35 36 38 40 41
SR 4 12 13 13 13 14 14 15 16 17
, , 38
r r~ ~rr r~~ rw r rr r rr rr ~r ~ rr
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
4:15-5:15 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 81611991
EXPANOED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AUENE ANO FARR ROAD WITN VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 WT 1277 1315 1354 1394 1477 1565 1658 1756 1860
WR 22 23 23 24 26 28 29 31 33
WL 79 84 90 95 108 122 138 156 148
NT 49 50 51 52 55 57 60 62 65
NL 74 78 83 88 99 111 124 139 164
ST 82 84 86 88 92 96 100 105 111
SR 7 7 8 8 8 9 10 10 11
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A1 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND DARTMOUTH RD.) WITH VALLEY COUPLET ,
MOVEMENT RE0.1997 1998 1999 ~ 2000 2002 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
WL 75 77 79 81 85 89 93 98 103
NL 103 106 108 ~ 111 116 122 128 135 142
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNNERSITY CITY ACCESS L2-A2 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
~ MOVEMENT RED 1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 1002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 2010
WL 47 48 49 51 53 56 59 62 65
NL 65 67 68 70 73 77 81 85 r 89
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A3 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND BALFOUR RD.) WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1991 ~ 1998 C 1999 1 2000 1 2002 1 2004 ~ 2006 2008 ~ 2010
WL 31 32 33 33 35 37 39 41 43
NT 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
NL 47 48 49 51 53 56 59 62 65
ST 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7
, , , 39
~r m m r r r rr r rr m r r rr m m m m r rr
EXPANOED UNNERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A4 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND RAYMOND RO ) WITN VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI RED.1991 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 1002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 1010
WL 24 ~ 25 25 26 27 28 30 31 33
NT 4 ~ 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
NL 35 ~ 36 37 38 40 42 44 46 , 48
ST 4 ~ 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
r EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A5 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT~ RE0.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 1 2000 1 2002 L 2004 2006 2008 ~ 2010
WL 27 28 28 29 31 32 34 35 37
NL 39 40 41 42 44 46 49 51 54
EXPQNDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AVE. ANO UNIVIERSITY RD. WITH VALLEY COUPLET
,
MOVEMENTI 1997 1 1998 1 1999 2000 1 2002 1 2004 2006 ~ 2008 2010
WT 1006 1035 1064 1094 1157 1223 1293 1366 1233
WR 59 60 62 63 65 68 71 74 79
WL 224 229 234 238 248 259 270 261 224
NT 404 412 421 430 448 467 486 547 283
NR 1186 1211 1236 1262 1315 1371 1428 1488 1216
NL 403 411 420 429 447 466 485 506 261
ST 263 269 274 280 292 304 317 330 263
SR 82 84 87 89 94 99 105 111 102
SL 154 157 161 164 171 178 185 193 207
, EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A6 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1991 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 ~ 2010
ER 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 29 30
SR 94 96 99 101 106 112 117 123 129
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS AT WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT RED.1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2002 1 2004 1 2006 L 2008 L 2010 ~
ER 222 228 233 239 251 264 277 291 305
NL 116 119 122 125 131 138 145 152 159
SR 25 26 26 27 28 30 31 33 ~ 34
, , 40
■r ~ rr r ~ r ~r ~r rr ~ r~r ~ ~r ~r w ~r ir ~t ~
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A8 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT LRED. 1997 1 1998 1 1999 2000 2002 ~ 2004 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 ~
E R 25 26 26 27 28 30 31 33 34
S R 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 F 17 18
, EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SECOND AVE. AND UNIVIERSITY RD. WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ER 609 624 640 657 690 725 762 801 667
EL 1133 1170 1208 1247 1328 1414 1506 1604 1360
NT 483 494 SOS 517 541 566 592 619 482
ST 611 625 639 654 684 716 149 783 487
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A9 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTLRED.1997 1998 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 2004 1 2006 ~ 2008 2010
EL 49 54 51 53 55 58 61 64 61
SL 40 41 42 43 45 47 50 52 55
, EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A10 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI 130 1 1998 ~ 1999 1 2000 1 1002 1 2004 ~ 2006 1 2008 1 2010 ~
EL 86 88 90 93 97 102 107 113 116
SL 94 96 99 101 106 112 117 123 129
, , r EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A11 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 1000 2002 1 1004 ~ 1006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010 +
EL 120 123 126 129 136 142 150 157 165
SL 130 133 137 140 147 154 162 170 179
EXPANDEO UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR UNIVERSITY CITY ACCESS A12 WITH VALLEY COUPLET
(SPRAGUE AVE. AND DARTMOUTH RD ) WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENTI RED.1997 L 1998 1 1999 ~ 1000 f 2002 2004 1006 2008 ~ 1010 ~
EL 146 150 154 157 165 174 183 _ 192 667
SL 135 138 141 145 151 158 165 173 487
, , 41
EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR SECOND AVE. AND FARR RD. WITH VALLEY COUPLET
MOVEMENT 1997 ~ 1998 1999 ~ 2000 2002 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2008 ~ 2010
ET 1840 1868 1938 1988 2093 2202 2318 2439 1969
ER 98 101 104 107 114 120 128 135 147
EL 15 11 19 22 27 34 43 54 76
NT 108 110 113 116 121 127 132 138 147
N R 75 77 79 82 86 91 91 102 63
ST 108 110 113 116 121 127 132 138 147
SL 46 50 54 58 68 79 92 107 1a9
i.. i r
42 '
i
1
t
1
1
Appendix 2
1
~
1
,
1
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNiMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&FARR.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: COUNTS TAKEN 6-11-96 (P.M. PEAK)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1376 98 63 1024 19 74 34 55 37 45 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds , Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat._.on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 7.2 B
TR 3180 5530 0.554 0.575 7.0 B
WB L 111 1770 0.615 0.063 30.3 D 7.3 B
TR 3203 5571 0.389 0.575 6.1 B
' NB LTR 332 1328 0.533 0.250 18.1 C 18.1 C
SB LTR 335 1341 0.289 0.250 15.8 C 15.8 C
Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.553
1
43
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIIMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FAR2.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: PRE. 1997 VOL. FOR UNIVERSITY C. WITHOUT REDEVELOP. OR COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1407 100 64 1047 19 76 35 56 38 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
~ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 7.2 B
TR 3180 5530 0.567 0.575 7.1 B
WB L 111 1770 0.633 0.063 31.2 D 7.4 B
TR 3203 5571 0.398 0.575 6.1 B
~ NB LTR 330 1321 0.551 0.250 18.4 C 18.4 C
SB LTR 333 1332 0.297 0.250 15.9 C 15.9 C
Intersection Delay = 8.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.567
'
44
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SLTMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI2.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 VOULMES FOR UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT REDEVELOP. OR COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
, L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 82 1199 134 171 854 60 146 134 87 157 200 70
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 C!
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
' Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru LL, = 7 u
Right * * Right * .
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right ~
Green 7.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Lenqth: 80 secs Phase combinata-on order: #1 #2 #3 ,#5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 88 1770 0.983 0.050 92.2 F l~.s C
TR 2064 5504 0.756 0.375 15.3 C
WB L 243 1770 0.748 0.138 29.5 D E
TR 2558 5530 0.418 0.463 9.3 B
' NB L 221 1770 0.701 0.125 28.1 D 21.5 C
TR 745 3508 0.333 0.213 17.3 C
SB L 221 1770 0.755 0.125 31.1 D 22.5 C
TR 761 3580 0.396 0.213 17.7 C
I Intersection Delay = 17.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.665
~
45
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPR.AGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD F-~-
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FAR4.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97 U-- c c"T y
Comment: MAX. 1997 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CITY(NO COUPLET) ~4--'s T~c
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ai-; f~;_ `
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
, Volumes 15 1728 100 76 1293 24 76 35 70 41 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C
TR 3189 5546 0.685 0.575 8.1 B
WB L 111 1770 0.750 0.063 39.8 D
TR 3203 5571 0.491 0.575 6.6 B
' NB LTR 330 1318 0.598 0.250 19.2 C 19.2 ~
SB LTR 322 1287 0.320 0.250 16.0 C 16.0 C
Intersection Delay = 9.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.665
'
'
46
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI4.HC9
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: MAX. 1997 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CITY(NO COUPLET)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
, L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
Volumes 104 1509 167 196 991 59 204 141 90 157 247 83
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
' EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right .*,Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat_,on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.016 0.062 96.3 F 29.0 D
TR 2039 5504 0.962 0.370 25.2 D
WB L 262 1770 0.797 0.148 32.2 D 13.3 B
TR 2530 5538 0.486 0.457 10.0 B
' NB L 219 1770 0.993 0.123 67.7 F 40.6 E
TR 736 3508 0.350 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.764 0.123 32.1 D 22.8 C
TR 753 3586 0.490 0.210 18.6 C
Zntersection Delay = 24.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.822
'
47
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
, -------------Center_For-Microcomputers-In_Transportation---------_--_--
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARI0.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 15 1760 100 78 1318 25 76 35 75 44 46 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat:_.on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 8.4 B
TR 3189 5546 0.697 0.575 8.3 B
WB L 111 1770 0.768 0.063 41.7 E 8.4 B
TR 3203 5571 0.501 0.575 6.7 B
' NB LTR 329 1316 0.617 0.250 19.6 C 19.6 C
SB LTR 314 1255 0.338 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
Intersection Delay = 9.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.680
48
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNiMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNI10.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
, Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<Volumes 105 1542 170 199 1007 59 208 142 91 157 252 84
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: /1 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.025 0.062 99.7 F 32.1 D
TR 2039 5504 0.983 0.370 28.3 D
WB L 262 1770 0.808 0.148 33.1 D 13.4 B
TR 2530 5538 0.493 0.457 10.1 B
NB L 219 1770 1.011 0.123 73.1 F 43.2 E
TR 736 3508 0.353 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.764 0.123 32.1 D 22.8 C
TR 753 3586 0.498 0.210 18.7 C
Intersection Delay = 26.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS =,D
, Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.837
~
49
~ •
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARS.HCg
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 VOL. FOR EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUFLET
' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
Volumes 16 1807 105 79 1352 25 79 36 73 43 48 ,
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 b
' EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru * tio , . ,
Right * Right *
Peds Peds o~ i i} _
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right * A)u,uz3-1
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-,on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.6 B
TR 3189 5546 0.717 0.575 8.5 B
WB L 111 1770 0.777 0.063 42.7 E 8.5 B
TR 3203 5571 0.514 0.575 6.7 B
NB LTR 327 1307 0.624 0.250 19.8 C ;0 C.
SB LTR 317 1267 0.338 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
Intersection Delay = 9.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.695
1
'
~
50
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 03-18-1997
~ Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPR.AGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSZTY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNIS.NC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: MAX. 1999 VOLUMES FOR REDEVELOPED UNIVERSITY CIrI''~' (NO COL'PLF'I')
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T r;
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
~ Volumes 108 1574 174 204 1034 62 213 147 94 164 258 87
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right * .
Peds Peds 1 '
WB Left * * SB Left
Thru * * Thru * A) vrNL k I ;
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OA Green 9.OA 16.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle_Length__~f81 secs__Phase_combinat_on_order__#1_#2_#3_#5_#6________
Intersection Performance Summary
' Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 109 1770 1.053 0.062 110.5 F 36.6 D
~ TR 2039 5504 1.003 0.370 32.5 D
WB L 262 1770 0.828 0.148 34.8 D 13.7 8
TR 2530 5538 0.507 0.457 10.2 B
~ NB L 219 1770 1.039 0.123 82.2 F 47.3
TR 736 3508 0.365 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 219 1770 0.796 0.123 34.6 D 23.7 C
TR 753 3586 0.512 0.210 18.8 C
~ Intersection Delay = 28.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = CLost Time/Cycle, L- 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.857
~
~
51
'
iiCM. SIGf1ALIZLU IIN`IE11SECI':iOI1
~ Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation_--_ - J--
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARI2.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLE1'
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southboun:.i
L T R L T R L T R L T
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< > 1 < > 1 <
, Volumes 16 1840 105 82 1378 26 79 36 78 46 48 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left *
* Thru
Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 4.OA 45.OA Green 19.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0- Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat~.on order: 11 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.8 B
TR 3189 5546 0.729 0.575 8.6 B
WB L 111 1770 0.805 0.063 46.0 E 8.8 B
TR 3203 5571 0.524 0.575 6.8 B
~ rJB LTR 326 1304 0.644 0.250 20.3 C 20.3 C
SB LTR 308 1233 0.357 0.250 16.3 C 16.3 C
Intersection Delay = 9.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.710
~
5~
'
HCM: SIGNALILED INTERSECTION SUriMARY Version 2.4 08-13-1997
, Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPR.AGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: COUNTY ENG. File Name: SPR&UNIA.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITHOUT COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 3< 1 3< 1 2< 1 2<
, Volumes 110 1609 177 208 1051 62 217 148 95 164 263 88
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 u 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
* r Peds Peds
WB Left * * SB Left *
Thru * * Thru *
Right * * Right *
Peds Peds
~ NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 10.0A 3.OA 30.OA Green 10.0A 16.OA
Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 85 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #3 #5
Intersection Performance Summarj,Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay Lo~~
EB L 146 1770 0.803 0.082 42.5 E 43.8 E
, TR 2007 5504 1.041 0.365 43.9 E
WB L 292 1770 0.758 0.165 29.3 D 13.8 B
TR 2476 5538 0.526 0.447 11.1 B
1 NB L 229 1770 1.008 0.129 72.1 F 43.6 E
TR 702 3508 0.386 0.200 19.2 C
SB L 229 1770 0.760 0.129 32.3 D 24.1 C
TR 717 3586 0.548 0.200 20.4 C
Intersection Delay = 31.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.867
53
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
~ Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SP&FA.HC9
~ Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET, NO EXPANSION 1
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1<
Volumes 63 1024 63 74 49 82 7
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left * 'Thru Thru * - `
Right Right
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru * w L L=
Right * Right *
Peds Peds t4)Z3T = ~ Z ~7
NB Right EB Right
SB Rlght WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: J1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C o~ci: :
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 5877 9219 0.234 0.637 4.0 A 4.0
NB LT 428 1490 0.310 0.287 14.5 B 14.5
SB TR 476 1656 0.204 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B;
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.258
~
1
54
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UNIN.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
, Comment: 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET, NO EXPANSION;
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 167 836 59 143 131 85 154 196 69
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru * ~Jo r` .t , . z
Right Right *
Peds Peds w r.4 .77*E:.--
WB Left * SB Left * N L)="" s
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16 . OA Green 4 2. OA 10 . OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-4on order: 11 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
, Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 1946 9158 0.639 0.213 22.3 C 22.3 c
NB L 951 1770 0.157 0.538 7.1 II 7.1 B
LTR 975 1814 0.176 0.538 7.2 B
R 851 1583 0.071 0.538 6.8 B
SB L 243 1770 0.674 0.138 2998 D 27.4 D
TR 492 3580 0.601 0.138 26.1 D
Intersection Delay = 20.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = Cl
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.364
'
~
55
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 09-30-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SE&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET, NO EXPANSION ~
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
, L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Volumes 902 483 359 363
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ~
EB Le f t * NB Le f t
Thru Thru
Right * Right wr7 j: T~~ yt
Peds Peds ~
WB Left SB Left
N v rc k,e~-
Thru Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summar-,-
~ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C :~L,P, r~ac-h :
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LIoS-)
EB L 2035 3539 0.496 0.575 6.7 B 6.4 B
R 1821 3167 0.326 0.575 5.8 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.314 0.350 12.3 B 12.3 B
SB T 1304 3725 0.318 0.350 12.3 B 12.3 B
Intersection Delay = 8.4 sec/veh Intersection Los = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.429
~
56
~
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMAR`t Version 2.4 3 9 -199 7
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&T^~,I
, Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET, NO EXPANSI021-
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbounci
L T R L T R L T R L T
No. Lanes > 4 < 1< > 1
Volumes 15 1376 98 108 55 37 108
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right ~174
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right * Nv~ ~ ~.S
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat:_..on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
1 Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 4606 7369 0.387 0.625 4.8 A 4.8 A
NB TR 477 1591 0.371 0.300 14.5 B 14.5 B
SB LT 487 1624 0.322 0.300 14.2 8 14.2 L"
Intersection Delay = 6.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B;
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.382
~
~
~
57
~ .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIl4iARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARR.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
~ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1 <
Volumes 79 1277 22 74 49 82 .
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 C)
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds _
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summarv
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C r.~pr~aci,.:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay Lo:~
WB LTR 5903 9259 0.279 0.637 4.1 A 4.1
NB LT 428 1490 0.310 0.287 14.5 B 14.5 B
SB TR 476 1656 0.204 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
I Lost_Time/Cycle, L = 6.0_secCritical_v/c(x)__0_289
'
~
'
58
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-19-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UrdIN.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T F,
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 224 1006 59 403 404 1186 154 263 8:Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 G
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru * _ .
Right Right *
Peds Peds -WB Left * SB Left * -
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.OA Green 42.OA lO.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
WB LTR 1949 9170 0.774 0.213 24.0 C 24.0 C
NB L 951 1770 0.441 0.538 8.7 B 25.6 D
LTR 928 1726 0.922 0.538 23.2 C
R 851 1583 0.994 0.538 36.4 D
SB L 243 1770 0.674 0.138 29.8 D J0.4 D
TR 494 3593 0.779 0.138 30.7 D
Intersection Delay = 25.6 sec/veh Intersection I,OS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.908
~
~
59
~ -
HCM: SIG14ALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-13-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&'J*il.:i(,rj
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLE`T'
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southboun~?
L T R L T R L T R L T :p.
No. Lanes 2 2 2
Volumes 1133 609 483
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left
Thru Thru *
Right * Right
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left i -
Thru Thru *
Right Riqht
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 2035 3539 0.624 0.575 7.7 B 7.2 F'R 1821 3167 0.411 0.575 6.2 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.423 0.350 13.0 B 13.0
SB T 1304 3725 0.535 0.350 13.8 B 13.8 F?
Intersection Delay = 9. 5 sec/veh Intersec`~ s
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.59-~~
'
~
60
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name:
Area Type : Other 8-11-97 8/ 6,'
Comment: 1997 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T
No. Lanes > 4 < 1< > 1
Volumes 15 1840 98 108 75 46 108
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Le f t * NB Le f t *
Thru * Thru
Right * Right *
Peds Peds ~ -
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 4620 7392 0.505 0.625 5.4 B 5.4 B
NB TR 472 1573 0.422 0.300 14.9 8 14.9 B
SB LT 471 1569 0.355 0.300 14.4 B 14.4 B
Intersection Delay = 6.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.478
- - -
~
61
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&FARR.11c9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbounc.i
L T R L T R L T R L T I':
No. Lanes > 5 < > 1 1<
Volumes 90 1354 23 83 51 86 8
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru C'; 1 Right Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 50.OA Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay L4S Delay LOS
WB LTR 5901 9257 0.297 0.637 4.2 A 4.2
NB LT 422 1468 0.344 0.287 14.8 B 14.8 B
SB TR 476 1654 0.214 0.287 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
' Lost Time/Cycle, L=6_0 secCritical v/c(x) =_0_312
~
s2
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SiJNIIyiARY Version 2.4 08-20-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
,
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SPR&UNAA.HC9
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 5 < 1> 1 < 1 1 2<
Volumes 234 1064 62 420 421 1236 161 274 87
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal 4perations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left NB Left *
Thru Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds r.
WB Left * SB Left
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 16.OA Green 42.OA 10.0A
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay I,-C:~
WB LTR 1948 9165 0.817 0.213 21.4 C 21.4 C
NB L 951 1770 0.460 0.538 7.6 B 30.3 D
LTR 927 1725 0.961 0.538 26.7 D
R 851 1583 1.035 0.538 45.2 E
SB L 243 1770 0.703 0.138 27.2 D 28.3 D
TR 494 3591 0.816 0.138 28.8 D
Intersection Delay = 26.8 sec/veh Intersecti.on LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.94-9
1
63
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) UNIVERSITY RD.
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SEC&UNAA.HC9
' Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/97
Comment: 1999 EXPANDED UNIVERSITY CITY WITH COUPLET
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 2 2 2 2
Volumes 1208 640 505 639
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Le f t * NB Le f t
Thru Thru *
Right * Right Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left
Thru Thru *
Right Right
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right i
SB Right WB Right
Green 45.OA Green 27.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat:_.on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summar',-
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C App~oacn:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay L
EB L 2035 3539 0.664 0.575 8.1 B 7.5 B
R 1821 3167 0.432 0.575 6.3 B
NB T 1304 3725 0.442 0.350 13.1 B 13.1 B
SB T 1304 3725 0.560 0.350 14.0 B 14.0 B
Intersection Delay = 9.8 sec/veh Intersection Los = a
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.625
~
64
liCri: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08-18-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) SECOND AVENUE (N-S) FARR ROAD
Analyst: W.D.W. File Name: SECuFA:%.Ta.HC-1)
Area Type: Other 8-11-97 8/6/~~,
, Comment: 1999 EXPANDED_UNIVERSZTY CITY WITH_COUPLEri'
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes > 4 < 1< > 1
Volumes 19 1938 104 113 79 54 113
Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Riqht * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left SB Left *
Thru Thru *
Right Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Green 49.OA Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB LTR 4620 7392 0.534 0.625 5.5 B 5.5 B
NB TR 472 1573 0.443 0.300 15.1 C 15.1 "
SB LT 463 1544 0.393 0.300 14.6 B 14.6
Intersection Delay = 6.8 sec/veh Intersection I.os = i~
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.504
1
'
65
I
,
' I
Glossary
Arterial: Signalized street that is primarily used by commuting traffic. Arterials usually
allow access to adjacent facilities and roads.
Delay: The additional travel time experienced by a traveler due to a transportation
situation. Can be used to quantify levels of service.
Demand Volume or Demand: The traffic volume needed to reasonably accommodated
vehicle or pedestrian flow.
Capacity: The maximum rate of vehicle or pedestrian flow that a traffic facility or lane
segment can be expected to handie in a specified time frame.
Gross Leasible Area(GLA): Gross Leasible Area is all of the total floor area, usually
measured in square feet, that is designed for tenant occupancy and client use(Trip
Generation, 1991).
I.T.E. Trip Generarion or Trip Generation Reference(1991): Nationally accepted ,
compilation of traffic counts, surveys, and historical data that give a valid account of
land uses based upon factors such as gross leasable area, number of employees,
occupied rooms, etc. This is the fifth edition available by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers from 1991.
Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition(1994): Reference manual that presents
operational, design, and planning capacity analysis for a broad range of transportation
faeilities. This r-nanull is a nationallv accepted manual on transportation planning and
d <<1:?n.
f,r~
Levels of Service(LOS): A qualitative measure used to descnbe the operational
conditions of a traffic facility. Usually rate by LOS A-F, with A being the most
favorable rating, and F being the most unfavorable ratinp.
Peak hour: The hour or hours in a day when traftic has reached the maximum,
countable volume. A.M. and P.M. peak hours are usually the morning and evening
rush hour. Peak generator is the highest volume that a development or operatin(y
business will ha~,e in one hour.
Phase: The part of a signal cycle allocated to a specific traftic inovement of
comhination of tra`ric movements.
Kate of Fluw or Flow Ilate: 'I'he equivalent hourly rate that vetiicle or I)ccicstr;ar,
volumes can be moved past in a specified location or seQmenc.
Kcrtlute I'ad: A facility, ur structure a~counuiblc: f'ur study, but not attaclled to the
' main facility or structure being studied. For University City, this would include retai 1
stores within the propertv confines of che dzvelopment(i.e. fast faod, banks, etc. )
Trip Gttieratiun: 'I'lic prc:clictcd irattic volunies ch1c a dcvciupmcnt or racility, is
expected to generate. The volume is usually given in passenger cars per hour per
lane(pcphpl). Maximum trip generation refers to the maximum volumes that is
expected to be produced by a facility.
Trip Distribution: The expected or anticipated directional flow allocation of observed
or predicted traffc volumes within the transportation network being observed or
designed.
Threshold Study or Threshold Analysis: A report that verifies that a full traffic
study is not warranted for a project or development. A threshold analysis must verify
that a project or development will not:
1. Adversely modify the existing transportation network;
2. Effect or the intersection level of service or lower the level of service below an
' acceptable level; and
3. Increasc c~c r,lancj ~~n th~ -,nr,~n P~~trh~.' r~~ore th~r7 5~ c~f ~~t:i~tin~T
capacit,,. I
'
Valley Couptet: Planned transportation network that will renovate Sprague Avenue
and construct new Second Avenue so that they relieve the capacity between downtown
Spokane and the Spokane Valley.
V/C Ratio: The Volume/Capacity ratio is used to describe the demand f1ow rate to
capacity fo~r a traffiic facilitv. C1n be used to catenorize levels of ser~-ice.
,
,
~
~
~
~ -
,
o
~
~
~
r.
Taylor Fjeigmeenng, Im
~
C1vd De,51gn aIld Latld M ,
~
~
r"
r
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 12, 1998
■
TO: Scott Engelhard
CC: Bill White, Taylor Engineering, Inc
Jim Haines, Spokane County Engineering
Louis Webster, Spokane County Planning
FROM: Steve Stairs SPt~Wf CLUKIT
SUBJECT: Revised Tr ic Study for the University City Mall Expansion
ZE-18A-
I have completed my review of the addendum to the University City Mall Expansion Traffic Study
which was submitted to address my comment letter of February 6, 1998 The addendum
satisfies the last two requirement from the February 6th letter, therefore, I recommend that we
accept this traffic study and allow this project to proceed as technically complete
• • . ' Counl Public Works Department,
D • • : • • , • P , •
1026 West : • . • . Avenue Spokane, A 99260
Voice 509-456-3675
Fax 509-456-2243
E-Mail LWebster@Spokanecounty Org
Memo
To: Steve Stairs
From: Louis Webster, AICP ~
Associate Planner
Date: January 21, 1998
Re. University City ZE-18A- G
1
Attached is a Traffic Impact Analysis for the above referenced project I assume this is in response to
your letter requesting changes to the earlier submitted analysis Call if you have questions Please
inform me ASAP if this analysis is suitable for your purposes Thank you
0 Page 1
1
r
4 ~
C
S P O K A N E o ~ O U N T Y
DIVISIOI`T OF ENGINEER(NG AND ROADS • A DIVIS[O\ OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
William A Johns, P E, County Engineer Dennis M Scott, P E, Director
November 18, 1997
Mr William White
Taylor Engineering
106 West Mission Avenue
Spokane, WA 99201
Re: University City Mall Expansion Traffic Threshold Study
Dear Bill*
I have completed review of the above referenced study and discussed this project with several
of the other departments here at Spokane County Based on my review and comments from the
other departments, the following are presented for your consideration
1. The capacity analysis print-outs show that version 2 4 of the signalized module of the
Highway Capacity Software, HCS, was used Since the release of the HCS, several errors
in the program routines were reported and corrected through the issuance of software
patches The most current version of the signalized module is now version 2 4d and can be
obtained through McTrans The capacity analyses and level of service, LOS, will need to be
run under version 2 4d Please be aware that once patch `d' is installed, it will correct all
known errors in all of the HCS modules
2 From the site plan provided, F2, I have several concerns First, the signal, L2, currently at
Felts & Sprague will be removed with completion of the couplet and that access will be come
stop controlled This should not create any problems since the signal at University &
Sprague should create sufficient gaps to prevent undue delay Secondly, the access labeled
A8 on University Rd will have to be eliminated or restricted to entering traffic only because
there will not be sufficient separation between the driveway and the signal at 2"d & University
and the queues will block this access In addition, we would like to have accesses A10 and
A11 combined (or one of them eliminated) and perhaps located between the two proposed
retail buildings #4 and #8 It appears that there will be some access to the new Walnut Rd ,
although, this is not shown on the site plan, nor have any volumes been assigned to Walnut
3 The trip generation shown in Tabte 1 does not appear to have followed traditionally accepted
methods Table 1 of the report shows 512 9 ksf GLA for the redeveloped project. From
Table 1, page 1231, of the ITE Trip Generation manual 512 9 ksf results in a trip rate of 3.63
trips/ksf for the pm peak hour or approximately 1862 pm peak hour trips. This is the average
number of trips generally anticipated for a mall of this size during the pm peak hour of a
1026 W Broadway Ave 0 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 0 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 324-3478 TDD (509) 324-3166
►
typical weekday. Because the trip rates for shopping centers do not increase linearly with
increased floor space, a percentage increase in trips is not appropriate In this case, the
traffic shown is slightly higher than would have been calculated from the ITE manual.
4. The site plan for this proJect shows many pad sites surrounding a larger "mall" structure. in
calculating the anticipated trip generation for the site, the pad site areas were combined with
the mall areas and applied to the appropriate trip rate Because the pad sites have the
potential to generate trips at a much higher rate, ITE recommends calculating the pad site
trips for each use, adding those volumes to the volumes for the mall areas, comparing the
total to the combined mall volumes and using the larger result This procedure is described
in greater detail on page 1230 of the Trip Generation manual For this report, since the
exact uses are unknown, some assumptions should be made and a trip total developed. As
users are brought into the site their tnp generation can be subtracted from that assumed.
When the actual trip volumes approach the projected trip volumes from the assumed uses,
further analysis will be required before additional development will be approved
5 It appears that the driveway volumes for the future year scenarios have increased The
1862 trips or 1876 shown in Table 1 should remain constant throughout the study unless
additional shopping center space is added beyond the 512 9 ksf The only volumes that
would be expected to increase are the yearly increases of the existing traffic due to non site
specific background growth Future year traffic year traffic can be developed by the
following equation
Background Site
Future Existin9 1+ X Y+ project traffc for + 9enerated
year traffc traffic year X trafFc for
year X
where X is the annual growth rate and Y is the number of years projected into the future
6 This report has a very aggressive build-out rate, showing project completion in 1999 Since
the traffic conditions were analyzed only to 1999, this report, once accepted, will be held
valid until December 31, 1999 After this date, additional analysis will be required
7 Appendix 2 contains several capacity analysis print-outs that do not match any of the figures
in the report. Please verify the volumes used to determine the LOS
8 To show that the driveways will operate satisfactonly, please provide LOS calculations for
the build-out scenarios, with and without the couplet.
9 With respect to the vacation of Dartmouth Rd., there are several issues that will need to be
addressed First, the vacation of Dartmouth Rd and establishment of Walnut Rd will need
to be approved by Fire District 1 The future alignment of Walnut Rd will have to negotiated
between the sponsor of the U-City expansion and the adjacent property owner Further,
Walnut Rd will need to be designed and constructed to County standards and deeded to the
County prior to the vacation of Dartmouth Rd
10 Lastly, I would ask that all submittals be sent to the Planning Department so that as lead
agency, they are aware of everything that concerns this project.
a
I ask that these comments be addressed and that a new report be submitted with the above
issues incorporated if you have any questions or need anything further from me, please don't
hesitate to contact me at 342-3492.
Sincerely,
Stephen D. Stairs
Transportation Engineer
cc. John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
Scott Engelhard, Spokane County Engineering and Roads ✓
,
7WIor . .
. Eng meermg,
~ Inc.
.
Civfl Design and Land Planrung Yrinclpak.
Pirrl' Al. i:. 1, ;
.5'ttuilcy R. Sririru r
Murk A. An»uur.. l' I
nflt'lij(1 tarti'r.' %'J.
r'~SS111' I: f t C; :
1jlt.lc'It
Frc;rr,( K /de.:l.`
Chief Finanriul i i,. -
F.ct►vin G. k'ak»ild
T~',.}„-,~r,• 1 ll 1 ~~n~
_ . ~ .
(?ivision of Engineering and Roads
5pokane County
W'. 1026 Broadwav
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: University City Shopping Center Fxpansion
Uear Ste~-e.
Encloseci is the reyuesteci addenduni to the Proposeci 1998 University City Shoppinll
Center Expansion Traffic Impact Assessment that was submitted to your department
1<inuary 17, 1998. The addendurn includes aecess location clarification and a Time-Space
diagram from Farr Road to Universit_y Road. Please revieNv the addendum at your first
opportunity and contact me with yotIr conclusion.
Thank vou fc>r ti•our time. If you 11a~~e an\ ~~uesti~~►~s, please call uu.- ot`ticC
AR ~
.
~
d 4'~~ g= 7
• ~ ~
,
T_atiLOR ENGINEE G, IN C. /f
/ ` F~~ ~•/D - ~T
!
'iili D. White, E.I.T. Mark Aronson, P.E.
Transportation Fni-ineer Prir.cipal ! Project FnLyine~r
, 1~T. Sr'4_:11 I ~ c_,,t:nt•, !"..u:r:ttI:'
} r
I'here shall be no more than four ingress and three egress access locations borderii~i:
~
Second Avenue between Danmouth Ruad ancf University Road. The ingress and egress
locations shall be separate, with at least eight feet of raised channelization betwcen cui' l
cirups. I3otti ingress and cgress locations shall be clearly markc;d iur drivcrs ail,.
pedestrians. The extent of trailic coiitrol tor these locatians shall conform to 5pokan:
Cuunty Standarcls. Higure I~3 of the main repori depicts the origi»aI access scl7~ ,.I'.
attached schematic roughly depicts lhe access scheme outliiied in this addenciun
To demonstrate pc-ogression of vehicles along Second Avenue betwecn Farr ttoad anc:
University Road, a time-space diagram has been attached with this addendum. The tim<
space ciiagram graphically illustrates how triiilic tlows betwecn Farr and University. I'lie
horizontal bands depict access or intersection locations. Tlic vcriical lines show vchicle
progression over space and lime. The horizontal access represents lime in seconds. `l'he
vcrtical acccss represents distance. The greater thc slant to these (ines have in
cornparison the hori-r_anlal access, the greater the time used when travcling from point to
puint.
"l'lle attachcd timc-spacc diagraiii sliows smooth progressiori of vchiclcs trum Farr Road
to University. Thc spikes at Farr Road and University Road represent delay as a result of
stopped, red signal time. There is no location on Second Avenue that depicts rxcessive
travel times ovcr thc respectivc distances_ Z'his is supported by Highway Capacity
Manual signalized intersection analysis attaclied to this addcndum.
Conclusion:
The ingress and egress locations ot'tllis addendum have not been designed. As discussck:
with Spokane Guunly Tratrc Cnginecrs on 2/10/98, access design will be completed %,i,i
conditions sct by this addendum following report approval and shown with tinal projeci
design. With this addenduni, we expect Spokane County TraElic Cngineers to
rccommcnd approval uCthe f'roposed 1998 University City 1'rallic Inipact Assessmcnt.
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
Civil l7esign and Land Planning
105 W Mission Avc • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-8224
J
,
n resSlE9ress
,1 g
o
-.1 tp
03
~
gress 2
• 4 ~
In9resslE A
~
. ~
c
outh R°ad ~
•~a~~' ~
~ •E9resS 3
'1ngress 3
~
~
.tit~ Ingress 4
~
•E9ress 4
. r~
ingress 5
•~~fess 5 ,
,
111 co
O 1+~
~
~
N In9r~sS 6
~
~
~ ~e~sity R°ad
d ' •un~ `
= n~Vers~ty Road
r - -
'ttN -
Time-Space Diagram - L8
Traffic Flow Diagram, 90th Percentile Flow and Green Times February 10,1898
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 340 320 340
0ffS8t liniliiiiliiiilnulii1ilniiliniliiiilniiliniliuiliiulin0 iiiilf inliiiiliiiiliia Iliuiln
1 `
Farr Road E ~
~
~ IngresslEgress 1 ~
3
IngresslEgress 2 ~ l ~ ~ ` • ~ ' 1 ~ ' 1 ► ~
4 ~ i
Dartmouth Road
4 ~
Egress 3 E
Vlngress 3
5
Ingress 4 E
Baseline C:IProgram FileslTrafficwarelucity.sy5
Data Date: 5;00 pm
Timing Plan: DEFAULT
. .
Time-Space Diagram - L8
Traffic Flow Diagram, 90th Percentile Flow and Green Times February 10,1998
Main Street
Cross Sheet Appraach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 160 200 220 240 280 280 300 320 340
OffS@t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt111I1111I1111I1111I1111I1111II111III11I1111I1111IIIIlI1111II111II111I11
,@ Ingress 4 E
L6 ~
4 Egress 4
L7
Y I
Ingress 5 L8 ~ - - - w
~ Egress 5 E
:cond Avenue
Ingress 6 E ~
econd Avenue 0 - rr~~~~~~ ` ♦ r ~1~`~\\
University Road
Baseline C:IProgram Files1Trafficwarelucity.sy5
Data Date: 5:00 pm
Timing Plan; DEFAULT
ti
~ ~ M~ ~ ~i i~ii ~i ~r 9~r ~kr ~ f'~ ~ ~ I~ ~ t~. ~
- „ .
!I ~
FARR ~ k~ ,,y ~k~
. # ~ ~
~ ~n c~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
% ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ; ~ ~ 1
I~ 1 .~;r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~'I ~ ~i; _y ~
s.s~ f ~ ~ ~:I~r ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ rr~ k'~ .a ~
' f ~(r ~ ~'f ~ ~~r` : ~ ~ iJ'~ ~ ~ ~ r~1~ c ~ i
, ..x~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ r ` M
- ~ ~ : [ ll ( ~ :N f , ~r . ~ ~;j
yC~l I~ ~r-- 1~ ~ ~ I~~ I , ~J ~A,r, Vr ~ <<~i
~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ `]7 !
~ ~ , ~ ~ , l 1~ ,
- - - ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ } y~ . ~ ~ ti~ f
lr~'9 ~ ' f
' i N , ~ ~ f
~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 5, ~ ~ , D ~,R TM 0~J TFI ~ ~
~ . ~
~ ~ ~7~~ ~
~ * Y~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ i I ~ f ~ ~ , 1 ~ ~1
f ~ ~ r ~ i ' .
~ f . , ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ f . ~I r~ r ~
~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ a C,~
~ ~ , c ii~ ~ 1
• , ~ ~rF ~yl i~ ~ ~ I' ' ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ '~1M11 ~ .
I ~ ~ 4~~,~
{ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ .a . . ~ ~ .t .
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ f~"f~ BALF~U~ R~. , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~----I 'd _ . ~ , . - . " ~ ~ ~
I ~y 9 J ~ ~ Y ~4\' 1' ~ / .
~ ~ . ~ v C~ ~ RAY~I,ON~ ~a.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ .
_ . - ~ ~ ~ - ° . ~ c:~.~ ; ; ~ ~l
~ 1`~ ~ ` ~ f-:; ' ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ '~'yl
~ ' f ' ~ . I~ ' ~ ~ ~ ( ' •
-..s E:~.~ lJ N I V~~ ~~Y ~«~R .
.k ~ y 1 . . ~ '"i ' ~ ` ~ ~y`~ ° r
~ f' ~ ~ f' ,..a .
~ ~
r r ~ r~ l` ~ ~a . , ' ~ ' ~ ~ \
I ~ tl . . rl ~ I
f~ ~ ~ r ' 1 1 ~ . ~
I
s '
- ~ , ~ . S` ~ ,1,
. " ~ ~ ~
~ ~ f ~ ;r~ J.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ; , ~ ~
~ c~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .
' ' r . f . ~r ~ t ~ ~'a ~ t ~ f 1 •I
~ Jj~ °4C U7' ~ ~1C ~ - . ~ ' ~ ~"j ~rr ,y~
I~ ~ J ~ ' I`.', \J ~ 1.~7 ~y, 't Gl ~
~ ' • c~ ~ ~1 ~ ~
-f'- ~7 • ~ n?,'~~z ~ 4,1~`"t.} ~ .i ~ . . ~ ~ i ~
- ~ t ll ~r 4.f ; .i , ~ ' 1 , ~ "'-V ~ ~li
p, F ~ F~ ~y I
t- ~ ~ . ~ • ~ ` .i ' ~
~ I ` Y~a' ~ . ~ •It
y ~ I
- ~ . ~f'~'~ ~ . 4 A..V / ' /
^ . ~r 4 t ~
";i_:~LI :
r1~i~~~L~i~ li~L~~~ilC.~}1~1~~~~ 11~~~. ~~1~~1_.
l'i►~il 1 ~!ts Eilllj .~tnc~ I']i111I111~
til'. I il[i h[is5iots ,tvv: +:l., 'L}; . . . Spol,mse, lti'a-diinglcati 961-101
. Fll d;e{lfl} :128-3371 F!1X (509)
201 0 UNIIIERSITY CITY UVPTH FULL BUiLTOUT ANQ
VALLEY COUPLET COMPLETfON IJNivErRSITY CITY
(4:15 TO 5. 15 PEAK ~IOUR) ~~~rv~~._t~~~~r,~~ . , p
. , ~
i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
I I~ 1
~ . I ~ , . ~ I ~ ` , . r
1 ; ~ I' ' ' ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~l~~ ~ '4 El LLlf~1AVNUlhIhUlT1~UU ~
~ ~ ~ 1Y~~K9y^I~9'{ti9 ~
~*~E~ 1 , g ~ I ~ ~ rw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r~~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~~y p~ , , 0 1'11~~~=pti~~i►a} n ~ ~ n
~ ~ ~ , F ~ ~ ~~n~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ , ~ nxA~vy "i r~ ' ' t ~ r ~ e 1 ~ 4F
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ,~~3 y ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r }
, I ~ rr=r : ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ t }
~ ~ : r~+ ~ r~1=.:_._~_---- ~
: _ , ~ r . i v • . , , " ' , ~ z ~ - - - -----r..,.« - ~ ' f f : E~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r I
rr ~ J f . ~ A ~ Q J L Lf tS
~ ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ ~ ~k ~ ~ u!i#y~uapu-~~aa~pOuuu a d~~s , ~ - J~ r • ~ . ~•t F ~ i ~ ~ „ ~~~3~0~~~~°u~~r~~~~~~~ ~
~ y S+Iy~ I~y ~y ~1 ffr~ [r]1'~iJ7~~1} 17 177L*l=[ ~ . r r..r*• rrr •ar~*~}* w r ~ 7 •'L1~~~JIILIl~~l~~~118.! ;6 ~ r ~ ti ~4~~~~tib~~7~7r~'~ti'~rLV 'a ti
~ L ~ . 6 . F+Y ~ : e - ~ ~ ' + ~ ~ ~ f~ G~~~~T~#~~~~##~i,~ 4 ' ' = + . .
" , g ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~f~f~N ' ~ ~~r~l ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ii~ 4'44G ~ 04 4Q04 ~ ~ • 1 ~ a Yt~~, ~ ~ My~y
~i ~ ~~~I~I~~Nr~ ~~~d~ . ~~~~6 T ~ ~ ~t~k~ ~~~k ~ .A f f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ + ` dT~Ti ~ ~ ~1 ~lTlfP~1Ti ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` r~ ~ ti ~ ~ fi ~ ~ b~r ~ ~ ~ n
~ '1f { ~r ~ i ~x ~ `~9 r f I~ ~ ~ ~'~II ~ ~ ~ • . ~ ~ ~ } ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' --~'~1~4~1~~~~~1 Ir~d~~llllr~l~ I~~~~yr) , . ~ i ii~~ I ^ r ~4 ~ ~ 6~ y ~ 7 ( ' (I~y F/~r1 Jk W1'l~ , it I ~ ~ ~ ~y' ~ ~7 l `
~ 1'~J ~ ~ h~"''Y _ f ~ , , ~ 4'~~~~IU~1~1 i{ ~ 4^ ry .r~. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ V Y ti' ~y ~y F+1 + ' . ~ . } ~ ~ ' ' • TM~• ~ * ~ ~ * ~
~ I ` ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ .r' ~-Y-~ ~ , u ~ } .'~r " ' ~ ~ 91..~+ hY1~
~ ~•r 1' • r"+ _ ~ ~.•M~iY~i~'j~~YF i K~La4jC 0'a~TNPI'e. abfb ' ~ " Y~ ! ~ ~ r ~~4u U~9~i f L R ~ L: ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ ~ i ~ ~Y l ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ " ~ w ~ y y ~ I ~ , ' ^ ~ ~ • • ~ 1 ~ ' ~ I 1 A! , ~ ~ ~ . . r ~
~ /ry~~ . , ~ ~ ~ i _ _ .-I' ~111i~~~~~" ~~'.G~: ~ .a, I
~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ,(yny,y f, ~ f I ~ I = ~ ~ ~ 1 ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 Y ll U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ a ~ _ ~ ~ , . . . .
~ F ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~~..L7J_E I~.f~ ~ - .
• ~~i~~~l~~a~l~ ~ =-I- ~ ~1~~~~~~~I~I~~I~~~II~~~ r. :s ~ ~ ~ ~ F7 ~tl = ~ ' ~ 4 61u 4 I 7 1111flllflllfllll~ y
~ ~r Q~~~~fl~l~+~4 ' ~ . . fli~~ii~~il[~I~~ ~TII~ _ ~ ~4 ~.s I . - ~ _ ~ ~ , a .c , • ~ _ ~
n~ ~IIIIII~~I~~O~,•~ ' ~III~IVQ~11~~~~7~~~ + ! ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ` ~ ~
~ - ~~'u~~}II~~°~~ _ ~a~ ~ ~~~lf~!I~I~~~?~!~~~f~~ - y y; ~ ~ + - ' 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ -
Ilr~'~~f~ ~ -f ~ Ilt!'tilllf~~~llliilllll{1 - ~ u~ ~ I ~ _ . _ ~ F,.~~~~ , ~ . s~~li~~11. ~ ~ ~
+ 1~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~TT~~ii~ill ; ~ ' . C ' ~ ~ ~,i
t . ~ , , ~ ~ I . . L k wl ~ y,,,, ~ I ~ „ ~ ~ _1L1~1111~'~1- ~ ~
~ _ . ~71~~~~~ 1~71 y ~ , ~A~~~~ ~ ~ 0~~ ~~r~~zr}}~~3 . _ „ _ ,
]I , ~~I ~~~I~~rt q `'~~~~I ~Illl~l~~l+ ~ ~ ~ ' ~Yp~~~ : ~ ~ ~ ~~i~1i1i~~lri~~~~ ~ : ~ f ~ ~~r~ R.o ~
~ ; i i i~ - i " ~ ~ ' (I~!I~FII -z I ~h I~ - yl~ ~ ~ - ~~3' ~ y ' ~~l'I~" ~ i
~ ~ r _ 11~11111~Y ~u .t. +~I ~ 1 in ~ ~ - `3 ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~ 1'~'~ ~ . . ` I.~ ~ , ~ ~ ' . ''~f~f~~f{~~ ' ~ ' ' a~ p ~ ~ . ~ ~~~f~lff~ f ~ - ' ~ fM1 ~ ~
y ~ l~, ~ ~ ~F ~ ~~f ~~f_, , . ~ ~ ~ il~l:~l7 ~~~f1~;i{U~ ~ ~ ~ `
~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ =_~'..E~~Ill~ta~}f1~~l~f~li~~~ ~ ~ ,
' ' ~ ~ , ~ ,.~~~a~~~i;,?il~~i a~ r i ~f~ ~ i~I ~II I~EI~ ~I~~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ . ~ ti9 i : i ~~Y~~ f ' . U~I~~ff~ il~1TTll~'i~ ; ~ r~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~E~~~~~i~ =F~ ~ ~ ~ : 11~m,~:,= ~ ~ ~ i "~~E~rl~ i~:~; =
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a.. _ r~ M ~ , . l , ~I~ n~~i T _ ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ -I
~ , . r ~ 3 ~~I~f~{ ~ ~ ~ , ~Illf~` , i ~~r[ i L~1~~~ I1117f~`~~~;~r ut~vrR,~Tr w ~
~1. ` FI , ti~ ~4 F ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
~ t ' ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ i ~I ~~TTI[~11~ ~ry ~ - - - ~ 4 ~ ~ : : - 4 ~ ~ i xt { ~ i ~
~ "'y P ~ ~ L 1 ~ . 7~~~ Y,i I+,
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l~ ~ ~ ~f~ m 1 ~1 : ~ ` ' - ~ } ~
y ` , lt ~ ~ ~ . I * I~ ~ .~a ~ ' ` ` r~ ~ r'~ ~ I~~ f I~- [ 11 v• ~ ^I - d _~.ar. _ . , ~ . { ~kF~4 4,p ~
~ 4` titi~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ . r.~ a~'' I
~ ~ ~ t ~ , ~ i i ~ b J ~■~r~Da1u►M~l' • ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~L ' ~ V {l~ `~~Iflllff~f~fif~~ ` ; ~ . a r ~ '
~ _ ~ : . ~~~~~~~z~~~ ° ~
~ ~ . _ . . ~ ~ r- „ . . ~ ~ ~ r. , ' ~ .~d~ E_ ~ d
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~11~,~~s~11~'~~~~~~1~1~ ; I~ . x~~~~t~~~~ ; ~ ' ~,f~ ff/~~~`~rfff/~r rff{/frfffIf{/f/ fJ~~ = E+•,~~ rhf~{~ ~tS
y ~ ~ ~ ' • • ~ } ~lfl}} '~~~l1!!!/flff! f!U ~ ~4 '~U~f~~ ~ f4 , ~f C . . 'f . ~ ~ ~ ° p , ; ~4 , ~ yy ~~i~x~,~~ 1 _ ~ t ~ ~r
~ ~ ~4 ~ . ~~~~tL„11 ~~~~~I~tiV~~G r~ ~ ,b :F: ~ ~ r~~ ~ ~
t . ~ , ~ ~ ~ - r;;;~; } ~ . , ~ ~ ~ - , ~~~r~~,'~r~~~~ _ I e i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ i ~ ~r ~ ~L1~~41 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~
~ d , ~ ~ . _ , . . ~ ; ~ ~ d ~ I!!! !I IK!!.11~ II! LG'11f,',~'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ }
~ ~ -~.-~i ~ - rt.!~~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i, ----LL----~-t---------- _ . i~ ~
~ ~ , _ , . . . ~~-c-~ r.i = ~ ~[L~til~'-b-+"~-Grf sY ~ J~~`~"~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ '
~ - f~~~ - ~ y ~ ,~~r~.~.~ ~ ~ , . ,t,,,,
~~r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~y~ u
, Aa~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ° ~ + K11 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ r~Sy ~ . uV ~ ~-k~~ g P
4~ . ~r~ ~ ~ " .
~ a ~ . '~Y . ~ ~1~~~
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
q ~ F ~N~v~Rastry c~I-r°y
RV ~~v~~~P~nE~'~" NUUMNAr7Y MnL, StTE i'rAN
~
F3
- ' ~
~.i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ■
ti ~
. ,
1
r - .
_s i,., _ ~ ~ FARR ~ ~
~ , ~ ~ i, s ~
~ r.~ ~ ~ ~
; r' ~ ~ ~ sr , '~J ~ L3J ,
~ ~ ~ ~ rf~J ~ ~ ~ -•1 ~ ~ ' 4,l ~ ~ ~ ~ , -~~a ~
. ~ ~ ~ ,_r-_ ~ ~:a~~ c~ ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5fr, ~ {,~r
_ ~ ~l t(- , _ '~ti ~ ~ ~ r' ~ti ~ i ~ _s
I~ ~ , ('i ~ ~ 0 } , ~1 ~ ~ (I'~ \ ~ 7 i
~ ~7 M' ~x~ =j~ ~ 1 / / ~ r
J ',1 ~ C' ' f ' ~ ~ ~ q~+~"' ~ ~ ~ ' r~ ~
~ ~ 4 U' /
~ r ~ ~ 1 ,i,~ f I ~ ..m ~ , ~ ' f 4 .
. ~ ' - _
~ ~ ~ ~ #
~~~r~o~T~
~ ~ ~ ~
. ' ~ ` _ ~
~ .
~I ~ ~ ~ - ~n .
~y ' ~ ~ _ 4 , , ~ : i ~.1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '1~ rJ • ~1~ ~ r~ ' 1 lt / 1! ~ ~ l
S.I~C rf I ~ I
6~ ,~1 3_~: - , • . / . ~ C~. C.r~
~ ~ ` • ~ I~ t ~i ! ~ ~ ~ h ~ . ti ~ ~ ~f ~i ~ 4
f ~ ~ .
~ } ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ C~ BA~.FQUR ~D~
~ . ~ _ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ r 4 ~ 1
~ ~ C~ RAY~lo~D RD.
~ ~ ~t r~ r L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ . -
r~ r ~ ,ar =
~C~ . • ^ _ ' ; ~ fa1 !;1 ,'1 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ { ~ ` • ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 1-'~'~l~ ' r~ , ~ r , . ~
~ , ~JI~IIIER~ITY ~.dx,, .
5 ~~W r ~ 1 I 1 1 ~ f • ~ ~
~ r 'ti , ~ - . , ~ , . ~ r _.s
~ . f ~ ~ , ~r { ~ `
f+ ~ i ~ R , ~ r ~
~ , ' , ' , r'~ tJl
+ r ~ ~ '~1 , ~ ~ . ~ ,
I ' .
. ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i' r~.. y
~ ~~.f ~ r~~ f-'i ' ,t
' ; ' ~ 1
t ~ { ~ ~ • .1 ~_k ~ . ~ff~
we ~~f --1..+f~ h ~ U~ ~t~
~ :7 ~ ~ I t ..I ' ~ ~ C-` ~ ~I `+r ~
l'~'7 C.-+ ` ~ ~ i 1~~ : r'~1_'~ I l U ~ ''b , f ~ 1 , ~
~ f ` i
r ~ ~ 'r 1' V [ ~1 'r 1. f l .1 ~ , ~
~ t~ t~~~ ll ff ~ ~ ~ ~ , s . ~ .,~~,Mi , i~,
~ r (~I ' f~ , . f .
~ , ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ . , , _ i ~ ~ ~ .I f~ i~ ~ ~ ,
. . ~ ~ . s J'' .
. _ ~ r~ ~ ~ . ~ .
' _ ~-T 1^
~~~I F{I.,I
~i~ F~~~]~x~f)~' ~~~'1~1]1C~'~.11~h, ~I1(~'~ !I. , _Y,.m...~,~,.
1 '
]Vle Uowl~;~t ir11tI I.a~tlci I'llit~iii~~;; I 'U~+f , l' • -
14'. Ilfli hlis'~ion Aere,s spoI,iilzc, Wiishiueloll
. Fl l (~]IJ'1) .1~f1-.3,j79 ~'AX (~70~J) :~...~(3-1322'~
2010 UNl'VERS TY CITY INITH FULL BUIL-OUT AND
VALLEY COUPLET CQMPLETION UNIVER'SlITY LITY
(4:15 l~Q 5: 15 PEAK I~OUR) R E D~vr,.~~~~~~~rr
` . . . . rli r ~ ~
~ • •
ww or Engineermg, inc,
Civil Design and Land Planriing PrincipaLs.
.
Perr}, M. Taylor, P. E.
Stanley R. Strrling
MtukA. Amn,san, P.E.
Uavid C. Lnrsen, !?E.
Associates: Scutt M. Busclr, P. E.
Frank R. Ide, ASLA
Chief Financial Officer:
Proposed 1998 Edivin G. Wagnild
University City
Shopping Center Expansion
Traffic Impact Assessment REGE`VED
. SPOKA NE coUNTY
JQN 16 1998
DIVISION OF BU11D9NG AND PLANNING
BY
Date: January 15, 1998 Prepared by: William White, E.I.T.
` Transportation En ineer
i
~p~,, AF1.0,
. .
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
. ~
West 106 1Cssion Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201 -
Phone: (509) 328-3371
Fax. (509) 328_8224
106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371
FAX (509) 328-8224
~
~
~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
~
The purpose of this traffic study is to obtain data and perform a traffic impact
assessment for the University City shopping center eYpansion. The shopping center is
located adjacent to Spraaue Avenue and University Road in the Spokane Valley east of
Spokane, Washington.
The scope of this traffic impact assessment was outlined to Taylor Engineering, Inc. by the
Spokane County Traffcc Engineers on June, 26 1997 with addendum's presented via letter
on November 17, 1997. These requirements were to verify that the University City
~ exPansion would not unaccePtablY alter the existing transPortation sYstem or the Planried
valley couplet by:
1. unacceptably reducing the approach intersection levels of service,
2. developing unacceptable levels of service for shopping center accesses adjoining
Second Avenue, and
3. creating safety problems within the transportation network.
1 To meet the needs of the analysis, the following components were analyzed to adequately
track the progressive impacts of the project:
' 1. Existing University City access and intersection volumes;
2. Existing University City tnp generation;
3. Phase I University City trip generation;
' 4. Phase II University City trip generation
5. Phase III University City trip generation
6. Existing University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/University intersections;
7. Phase I University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/University intersections;
8. Phase II University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/University intersections
1
~
j
9. Phase III University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr
Second/Farr, Second/University, and Sprague/University intersections; and
, 10. Phase III access locations and Levels of Service along Second Avenue.
FINDIINGS:
Presently, University City shopping center and the satellite retail pads total 430,685ft2
gross floor area(GFA) generating a full P.M. peak occupancy volume of 1,722 trips. This
was used to establish the initial conditions of the shopping center. The existing vacant
grocery store was estimated as shopping center space for trip generation as requested by
Spokane County.
Phase I expansion, scheduled for completion in year 2000, will remodel the east side of the
main building to accommodate Rosauers Supermarket. A.fter the completion of this phase,
the total area should be 438,143ft2 GFA with a full occupancy P.M. peak generation of
2,282 trips. The P.M. peak trips increased by 560 largely based on the conversion of
shopping center space to grocery space. The volumes for this scenario were based upon
the IjTStitirte of Ti•ansportcrtior7 Engineers Trip Gerieratiori (Six Edition, 1997), or I.T.E.
Trip Generation and historical growth equations provided by Spokane County Engineers.
Distribution is based upon observed traffic patterns and I.T.E. Trip Generation entrance
, and exit percentages.
Phase LI completion is scheduled for completion in year 2002. This phase of the project
' includes the addition of satellite pads to the north side of the main building along Sprague
Avenue. The addition will increase the net area to 4522873ft2 GLA with a full occupancy
trip generation of 2,321 trips. The methodology for determinina the volumes and volume
distribution for this scenario is similar to above.
Phase III of the project will be the complete build out of University City. Build out is
scheduled to occur simultaneously with Valley Couplet completion. The Valley Couplet is
scheduled for completion in year 2005. To avoid any delays with the Valley Couplet, thus
makina this study void, the horizon year for the traffic impact analysis is year 2010.
, Volumes that meet regulating criteria for year 2010 is assumed to meet criteria for any
year from 2005 to 2010.
' The full occuPancY generation is 2,649 P.M. Peak triPs based uPon a 510,373ft2 GLA
project total. The additional uses with phase III include shopping center area and satellite
pads along Second Avenue. University City shopping center volumes were determined by
the I.T.E. Trip Generation. Distribution of trips were based upon a cordline analysis in
which project distribution is based upon trips entering and leaving a reasonable proximity
of the project area.
CONCLUSIONS: '
The first conclusions involved intersection Levels Of Service, or LOS (See Glossary).
. The overall intersection levels of service, used to describe the capacity and functionality of
an entire intersection, did not drop to unacceptable levels throughout each of the various
ii
' network scenarios. (Acceptable LOS is defined by Spokane County Engineers to be any
rating above LOS D for signalized intersections.) Therefore we conclude that a full traffic
study is not warranted on the basis of adverse intersection effects. See summary of results
below.
Table I: LOS Intersection Scenario Results
Scenario Tntersection Intersection LOS
Existing Counts (1998) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (1998) Sprague & University C
Maximum Counts (1998) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Counts (1998) Sprague & University C
Existing Phase I(2000) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Phase I(2000) Sprague & University C
Maximum Phase I(2000) Sprague & Farr B
Ma,cimum Phase I(2000) Sprague & University D
Existing Phase II (2002) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Phase II (2002) Sprague & University C
Ma.ximum Phase II(2002) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Phase II (2002) Sprague & University D
Existing Counts (2010) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (2010) Sprague & University C
Existing Counts (2010) Second & University B
Existing Counts (2010) Second & Farr B
Maximum Build Out (2010) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Build Out (2010) Sprague & University D
Maximum Build Out (2010) Second & University C
Maximum Build Out (2410) Second & Farr C
The second conclusion involved access LOS along Second Avenue. The overall LOS for
each access along Second Avenue is an A. Regulating criteria for access LOS states that a
~
D or better must be id further analysis. There is ample capacity with
maintained to avo
little delay between Second Avenue and the southern University access locations.
~ Therefore we conclude that a full traffic study is not wananted on the basis of adverse
access effects.
~ Recommendations:
This analysis has shown that there will be no unacceptable impacts with the completion of
phase I, II, or III of University City. Also, because the impact created by the renovation
of University City will be minimal, there are no foreseeable safety concerns with the
project. Based upon these findings it is recommended that the building permit application
process be allowed to proceed forward without further traffic impact analysis. .
iii
Table of Contents
Page
Executive Surnmary i - iii
Table of Contents iv
Traffic Impact Analysis 1- 26
Appendix 1: Intersection Projections and 27 - 30
Manual Count Summary
Appendix 2: Intersection Highway 31 - 51
Capacity Manual Analysis
AppendiY 3: Access Highway Capacity 52 - 68 .
Manual Analysis
Appendix 4: Reference 69 - 73
Glossary 74 - 75
List of Figures
Page
F 1: Location 2
F2: Existing University City 3
F3: Build Out University City 5
F4: Existing 1998 Volumes 9
F5: Maximum 1995 Volumes 11
F6: 2000 Intersection Volumes 14
F7: Maximum 2000 Volumes 15
F8: 2002 Intersection Volumes 16
F9: Maximum 2002 Volumes 17
F 10: 2000 Intersection Volumes 21
F 11: Ma-ximum 2000 Volumes 22
List of Tables
Page
~ Table I: LOS Intersection Results iii
Table 1: Trip Generation for Existing S
University City
, Table 2: Intersection LOS DescriPtions 12
Table 3: Trip Generation for Phase I 13
University City
Table 4: Trip Generation for Phase II 31 - 51
University City
Table 5: LOS Interesection Senerio Results 19
Table 6: Trip Generation for Build Out 20
University City
Table 7: LOS Interesection Senerio Results 24
Table 8: Access LOS Descriptions 25
vi
~
1. Introduction and Description
Taylor Engineering Inc., was retained by Bernardo-Wills Architects to complete a traffic
impact analysis for the University City Shopping center located in the valley of Spokane,
Washington. The scope of this traffic impact analysis was outlined to Taylor Engineering,
lnc. by the Spokane County Traffic Engineers on June, 26 1997 with addendum's
presented via letter on November 17, 1997. The purpose for this analysis was to verify
whether or not the University City expansion would unacceptabiy aiter the existing
transportation system or the planned valley couplet system by:
1. unacceptably reducing the approach intersection Ievels of service,
2. developing unacceptable levels of service for shoppinc, center accesses adjoining
Second Avenue, andlor
3. creatinb safety problems within the transportation network.
II. Project Description
The University City shopping center is located south of Sprague Avenue and west of
University Road. Presently, University City is a 390,00Oft2 gross leasible area(GLA)
shopping center with 40,685ft2 gross floor area(GFA) of external commercial pads. The
satellite pads, wh.ich border Spsague Avenue, increase project area to a total 430,685ft2
GFA. The pads include Taco Bell, Less Schwab, and the Villaoe Square specialty retail
strip. Arrangement of access to University City is from several driveways along Sprague
Avenue and University Road. See figure 1 for project location and figure 2 for present site
arrangement. (Figures are depicted in this report by a capital "F" followed by the figure
number)
The expansion of University City will be completed in three phases. Phase I is the
renovation and expansion of 40,000ft2 of the main building to accommodate a 51,300ft2
Rosauers supermarket. Phase I, is scheduled to break ground in the summer of 1998, will
1
rMA;oN, Ar~r~r
~cniun n
1 ii I= ~`'/"'~`44no ~ uqNun' I C~N in~ cEintn R
1 'y nd/ .09 ,f.... r: f ~i~~ ►1+l yX~ I_ F11J
Y; ~ ~ yI ► ~ ~ 6, "D~ r
, o. ),,9 /,:11s I i' n'• euA "D
OiCKdfo~A~~d~1~iS . l•~ Z s !FI,A ~r*
!1N!'~ m (((111 EUON AO El .A ~ '\io b^
J ! fl~~pb ~ ' e f f.TOfl , r+c
\
v l n j'7na~ . OICK _RD ' DICK ~ p
DORN . c, ciCK: ,n' z
1FW15 R > ! 1
. ~ ; , .
\ie ^I" s s
i . t
'4 o ~n
b z_ ~YISTA ROAD
~I SIPVIf ~ y 9 uESA h ~ SlPPI! ~ - -s n ~D ~ E ~y AO va
p - IAURA AUflA
y c
In L D In ~ *
` h ~ C ~ 54FC~N1 Z u ILti w ~ m
F ' .
o i o I~ v AflGENi ~ ` _J ~ c?;
II..D - r•I- -
~i N =A e 7~ ~
y y G i V O-1 /ll ► N S m j
A '
L1AV GllEflllf _ fl0 = DAIE 41fi~'.UFlql[
Flp N ic I
, ~l{ui 'HI+soN+ p+~hRG ~
aR( orir~E n~ 01JNE t=
MuunfJ I ~~o I! ;
siuui no
ittOw RD D ' s
ts
~pU-' ' - b < wiuow o r
~~s " ~n • + ~ u !t H rn i ~J,0~1ltd r/
: DISIIA H lN N.'_i^` 11.' ~~•li ~ s v~ on 0
OCUST _fl0 ~n u e-t•
AI
UKIIAIAlI.~f10,.1"l1 LOLUSI 110
`rAl161 Iy~~1,10's /ais `~1iPl 1 ~ u 1 ~
rann EO iNC y
AD ~~Oti ~nuno~ ~ r~nn s_ °u AOR~z TIIACI
uAC.. ~a..mur~ r IAAR r =AAllll Y ~
, , . ~QI y 101~t . ; SUHQF 1LAND 3 _ ;uaotRUr ~ Ult! ERLAND
~ . 1~1+g °li .imCi
I SUtIOENI+UID o Q-
` ~~~d 1Y00 RUiF° AO WOOOfIUFF flD WfW9AUFf 8D z
v ~ ~
wAuwT G sr - n WALtIUT no o ~ a aAt, Ur
_ - a--- NEflALD
H EIJA lO Z Sf / C HEflAID flD 1: MtN,tD ~ ►~~~n J~
iitAUO tx OA1 Tu0U1H m ; ~ . O• ' 4~ a.
m
0 S3 n c r n OAflTl10lITH ~ oAe uou"i o
~
Z/ 1d : n n DA(~110UIN Z, .
Y rn ~ Q.v F E l T S fl 0 r I[LI S l m r f E I T S ~i q.p _ f E li$ q p
,D Sll]! 8Al'OUf ST m r~
~ . i N n BUfOUi y C
841
i Fp /0 I BALFOU)1 ~ v o e~~
~ ~B(I ~ ~ ~ t 2 flAT610tID
~ 0+n "
~ r D AAY`I01lf S C ' y w ~ru
I AYI~OIIOL m n ~ O _~z-- C ~
SU NBIF m` 1 m OBtN m y pD OBERIIH o OBERIU! t ~~.y• ~
.~S„ RO OBkJAUI
OB Il i,
< ERIIfI ~ ^ y o ~OB[niiri 1 I + ~
TY
U11 VEN.~I1Y R)AC ril UtiIVERSITY RD ~ UIfIYFR5I
c ~ ! c o r`~
m? 1 1 YAI uAt1IF11 fEH wL,~AR~f n « 1
~ ; V {
q no, o
y' ~ I ll Y 1 ~ w :I U ` ~ w ~ - N IYiI ~~1~l y
o,
' " y G LUII y ~ ► u I.1
` V
WCrCE RD PIIAC. HO Np o 1° v4ncE 1ao
. -u01/1I1 lN D
< < X.
<
r in in m m in 1. o- ~ IOHNSOM
SKIPW08TII _ i z Y KIPWORU SIIIYM'ONfN sKirwontx ni , SKJv,r aiH
,
SKIVWOITN I~O : ~ lM SKIPWOf IN -..ISAIiqOHIN CI Is otm ,~1o c ~
- WODOlYIFlO s . j i
1 m . D ~ T I ! N K M0t OriI~AD n 0 Wd'II
RD ~ ~
D in in . m ~IIOODYN m
-
I= D - y in CI f '
)15H t" " RD BOVYDIS nmvoisf+ ~ eowoise .
. y o . .W_. 2- -"i-•i~
: sun eu[s~::po j eAi[s
LOUfI ~~o
- 090N Ix YfllBllR li^ tYI N
Yl Illl ' - - WIIAUR we i ~ _._Jo wgoun s' _ ~IO,IN,~ _ ✓ ~J` _I "z .
MILflUR 2Ls_Ltcw< \~y M f01f o~ FOX Y~ `IOC ~ ~I~ ~ cWILBUflHD
Ct Y AEEVFS UIII_I ~ O = rn N
,
r Nt~ uulou r _ urnop . ~1 C.
U IIOI! ' C~~~-~ . • - 1[NAIIIC K UN1011 ~ W{
~ w ti ~ ~1..• m 'O PfNRYNE ~ f[R81NE ~ ~ p LAU
O1 ` m~ o u y~I= i 110BIE x ---lz n081t eo N08
• ~ ~ ~ R4t11E _ .y
YHIPPLE WNI~ ~ r
NliDll ~~Njp ! n PPIE wi Ivv ~
o
~ PINE
P fa°°
< I,n , ~J ~ • rirrES noao
tnuixi },_u'tenr~ o- l5 H -
W u ~ ~~tnnro ~ 9
4 nO.U. M ~p ~ in Q U I OU! ~y141
uouK NQUN w . .NOU.R r
~ ;
noUw : CDt ut s
. ~ py.
~ ~ r~ti 'i\~e y ~CCDII 1! . 1 - COLUIiS - -1 7 CI ~ n !t lIOUK ^ x
L~01, vkBClel1 V(A[l[II eptst ix ^ - 4 ~s~noN
F N f10 r ~ i~ . vl'F1ClCf1_dd_
u.• ~~'~C I vlllf,ull4 lftl fi'
uacu uI - vIfILU11A
nnGnnAIn .ti00DIAeu 1 I n•~
VJ00D11I WUtlntA wu A. m
-
b - . rr pn_ . tivoootptivn ~F ywnooi vi00DUrru ''i
c j~a~o , a~ H,m f I~o14 ~ I? ~T
rt1 . 4„~ :m li~nnonw ~n I~nnunw.^• I.~, IW unnnne
r - -
, T ~ , I .
i
I ~
i r.im+~ i~~a~ ~ ++►C4 G latf .cq
+u y^~GT i7+ r+Y':1 w T~fi+,lr. U"A ~.'f ~lC+{+LD 'u w471 +P~?! d h~L17 73-1. ~ a7 we t7i pr 7~+'+~y.n, V + ■~4WI Y~ R+R i+cll7Ai'Sl! ~911~+~ ~4 ~ r+G ~ID /P •,A1 nrA 7+177~7!4 ►•V1M Y y nr ~L ~ w! In 1~.31 W E 1 u~aw ~0~ x~AD ~War hFW a~i t~[JIm 4Cp0 a+4xR 1~wG 1~Y ~A~.Y 9i Rt 10"l~~ 4!t v a ST`~' 7 W~9 t49 r61 w -
r~ 1.~ 1*~L'7 ~ PL h{ {p IPM f/ ~*7~ ~l ~4~f ~ u ~9J.~17 10.iC+1 , 6',pt M1! C+r ~9 r67 d GU t~Cl 7?Y +P uiM7TY Y.~a e~~..b ~f hK ~+{~Yf D'~O1 R S+n ~~C'I ~k ' r4 6C9~ !}f ~T+ Sf~J ~ p FS Kll n0 RST ~ s.C n9tii 70~m Q1~7o-L' W wao !i Gf~ Vi 4'
~`CT IhE h~[7 7F4 ~ Pf7++R ff 7d W RC7 ~r.{ we d4Pt +•,i .a~a ~+t+A A 7a~+1 C~n .4. v~~JC~ ~r CI A[. hO+R swn ~r-af~f+S}~. •Cti7 ~1 ~W~ d~~r el"A7tl .+1 ~4 iM~ U<!P l.IYL6 YM M1i ~lY LFK ~ i+A ~~C'I Ui~ ~ ~
q,,. . I W SFI.yT~ d7l+~e3 b' Y+00d ~Sf ~9 M I!~{ x' 1 W~'.1 7f4i+SA ~ M1i m4Mn s Y~"+~ P~~S 7+t~ '~1+{ ~4 fi{ S6rf~.f1S1 yM i aU~A 6` l70oG rR+: ~o•u snw~KS~k~. h+a,o- l m~^+x ~.al 7' 1
• k,P~i ~S 7~7~7A1M a"'C .~7iuKY UI.;~ +71 Fj ~S dlPr+-0 V 1 K+O'! OV+S ~75+1 "61}K 1~"~+KST F7M }I1.] ~ CY k~ li! ~II'1 Q l4K7 C`J ~7 iT~VRNMli. Y11 1 I~d.'S 9 IE4d7 f[LT. i ~Rhe4 47! M1~4d
F1 r~ lU1 Mt7 ~S~'+ ~~1ML Y f7 haCi I~ S. Cl.l! W 6aa I+LS..4 d~ `L++'S ~~ti il=~~•~'• S K.~F !u'6~1 1W b~RS ~4Yr ~714~ A~ fl~ M4I V ~ av.R w nl C6rn d 7~?~+~i tR•R d•~v«{rp~, 7+7~-7r, u arr~ pn+'4 d~r w rIST ro nt O4 Or
~ PU4 'DlM i7.1~C{ KT'1 1 7Y~+~ 7 71 IiZT ~•/'ql t l{'~ ,rw'S r0 nC 6[d+~0 d~~t ~JN A M1i •a'~..iT ' , ~ rTM ~ ~~.n # unoo r11T, r~ ~rertSTt+, ~
~'^S UYf xW ~ rt~c1 ~t P~ f7+~~}+n. iE FSI Mut 1F49 ~[om4 n.~u6~ r tdn~+i y.4L R 1'~:~f:ti Ws a7i~ ~ w r4i+sR'Y' 9r MR s74lI ~*07! W~S7 r127 ~ ~M IKVrM 4' G~M G?K.+vS ~7T1 M1~ rtM ~pl ~ M.~ffi ~7 M1[ SPJM451 ~M ;~A[YVA P~527 F{rT~ i i~➢~L w aear nc Kn 4~ M1sro~ n..~7a ~a rrNt m.~r, ue n+aa~ r.~e ~w+.o c. +r+aM erye ~ sn~~r ~'Q 50 C ~CO :7~
ryi ,rA~f h.4 7r.i4~i ks~; 7Ma ~Urw.['iU►[ n+aai ~ tlb,K 1 1 r.r~~ .a rti ~ m-~ rm s nu~ ~ a vre:~wn. u rn~ ..ac n rr' ~r~~; ,.c vsT~.a r tir ~o+m m R..1 ~OSR K~~' Kisnt "C d~ n.A,y r~Ct Cwt~,l MG77 ~ ret~f 7a0o ~1 Ru~x y h~ `aTM SJy 4 SM ~+41 Sf~LF F~[T
rb~l.~7 W Or rw 7P aaO a py{ tine ~ n~ Ym ~ST Sa ~ MYt L'S 7+9 F~ P'7Lti4 M1[ ~4 P OJ•~S M+~t d9 d L+d ~ a 1`~21 RS ~~Rn! 7L~^d[ C~°7f M:Q++'aL I I'dQ! ~^~1 M WI !C f4T 7~9K7 F'~~T~ m Q7.5~ ¢wh hrt 7Ri~R w M1R Cd►.h y gv'~f. Tat a us+.C'!v~
. 7:1'W1M Id~6 i~E fLi" !T fK ~4~M l79RI~ fi"FA ~l~a~ ~ M i0.yTT d 9~U~44 STa7 7 uM4~pL
4a ~ S O
~ y I 4 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 1~~ k ~ ~r rv~-~ _~r+,-~--r~~ - ^ - Fc~FyO - ~ _ ~,L-- - L3s~~~ _ ;N _
: ~,~.~,~~w__~_~ ! ! --~F''-^-~ Q _ _~;i _`_e~.r~_• - - - . A _ r . ~~r - -
~ _ - ~ ~ r`s. ~ j,,~ - ~ V - rOti 0+ ~,mL Lr?~ ` _ _ e _ _ ~ - - _ - - ° - ' ' o ,~:a,:,; s[;s+ ~.y~..4~ . ~ ~ = ~ x~ ~ ~ - ~ e '4']T'• - _ ~ r~.A ~ 'l ■ • ~ ie4LR UOLT ~ 19ES+1 .w~~_ ~~_Y i ~~•-r~ ~ J' •~J~ , µ..."'~i':~ +L'~ff0~ ~19 ~ . ~ _ -~A4~ i a ti _ -~1~ ~~w.dc• Fr, F0.~0 5 P„~il.E r4 ~ ~ _ _ . _ _ - - - -r,...~ A~ .,,a. r. ~ti r+r, ~,R N•a3r:d~ f
S.""~ ~ _ . _ _ - ~ = - - - ` rrr t r ~e i.~. p ' Q I . ~ . ~ ~ - • v , „ ~ c~rrrr~ _ - l n~. . I : ' - ~.ar _ L2 . ~ I wr~e ~ . ~ti i ~ _ ~
aeur~,sr tNr ~ - ~ ~ x . '•,i '~ti,.~ ti ~""'"'no.n~ . . " ~ L ~~7 ~ i {•x~'C} r - . ~ y ~ . ~,~~~A~- rn,rr d~ `T" I`~ ~ I* 1 ~~•a~a.ti~.~~,.......~..~.. p N-- S1V~:a.qt' ~ER 1 ' ~''~....~~''~:a^.. » .a cu~ # . ~'°S` ~ ~ . ~
'rk~71 11~1 ' ' ~'~~.a-; ~i ~1 } r I 4~~ 4~it)1 ~y~ - • N I _ ~ _ GS , e ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~,.y,r~ S~TS , f ~i +~~~1. 1 1'~ r~ iL~i44~~{"T1"C..e•ti • ~ ~ S 1
_ , _ , _ , _ . . ~ :l ~ ~ ~►y y~,~ ~ ~1• f~ 1~ n r~ N ~ r~ ~ ^ ~.1. ~ 1 %J.i ~ ~ ' ~ f~i~7~" ` p~, M1 ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ I ti ~ ~ N17~1XT ~ 8~;,y 1, ~ t ~ - ~ i
1u: Y ' . ~r _ {I I '01 ~'R S,• ~ ~f~ ~ r ~ . _ S~ ~~_.~'.~-t`....,, 2~ ' r + ^ u.u+ctC ~..Ta. ~ 1 „c~ ' ~ r.,,: ~ _~x - . , , --~a'" " . k ~ C~': PRf11E.1 • . ~ ~ iC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~a , k . i~,l
• PL'.~E P'7~ e ~ ~ ` ~~3 I ~ N!'f ~ ~ ~ ~i''..ci. . , , . ,rr.,. -f LYM P71.i ~ . ~ 9 L ~ "~Y i ~ , ' 1 ~ ~ 4C~,~411 .r~ ~ i . ~ , . . i _ i
~ ❑ CCC,x+Cti~ THtC ' ~ ~ /;g•";''.t rr. ~ 1 ~ # ~ L~M"~~743 ~'Q " ^ "r'~ ''h, a..x. - ' ~ . ~ C~ofl ~ - 1 Hr0.o x~ vDRS
E7~T. 9GS ~t'IaSqN ~ ~ ~II f ~.r-r.~ I ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ I•~'rr ~ - r - F . , - ~ • r 1 ~ {^7-} R ra~ac*a ~ , ,l~ . ~ r, ~ I ; a ~ cr Pu~s+orr • ' i~o `ir,~' ,ti - ' i
r'arr~x n.ooA ~ i i~ , ~o,~ us ww~[ ~ ~ ' ss w 3A`CI'377 aCSx.~~RS • ~ 1 b7~CQ~ n I L ~ j 17h:nR 1 a ' 'r- ~ lI : ~'1 ~ ' ' F!~ •'w i ~ r O I NQ,,,--9 n . ~I I ,
t ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ f ~ ~4 1 ~~4 ,'1 ~ ~r'~=54~ L~C , I. ~ _ _ - y~~.~ri ~ _ t r. T ~
~ , ~ I>.e +x+v.c ~ r }4 SC!'~u ~ u ~ . r.7e[~+yoe ~.a5 ~ _ ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ 1 -~~'~r-¢ _ ~ ~ $r T. c~ ~ u'f _ - ~ r _ -r L ~
~ !~I ~ ~~~w r'Y'~ _.~~4}~~' • 'iy ~ Ib ' LS . `"7. } ~ ~I u9'~ ~y ~ ~ ^ ~ m-J~1'} ~ , -..~~rr--. . , I Y f - ~~Q ~ , _ _ - - - - ~ _ ~ ~ i', ' ~C, a~ ~~~~iN.~ ~iu 0 ~i . . . :'..-4 r~ ~ ~ ~-+~'"``„~_aa ~ul " Cu~ {J f b•L~ .T;iri~... ~
i~ ^ ~ ` „ ' i{~4~,~~i' Y ti~•_~ _ ~ -F--' ~;m ~~n~ ',5T1+'C►]'Y• ::'~.11~ r''~ ~ ` t f'~ !"_-•......•~-1-~" ~~:1'~rt' ~I1 , ~ ' ~ ~ r~ i i ` I ..._n*+ , .4L~y/•_-...~ '~"'~~,-~';a'7~ w t I .:hr.~ -
. , ~ti°•. 1 G.'bQ~r +S ss a . ~ , ~ , ~4 .I. ~ i~.. i ~~=o" r ~ ~ , vrcm n..~ ' ~ ,t } U~~S k y ~ ~~~-y.~•r , • " y_tt,y~ i ~ i , . ~ ~ ~ ~,ry r ~-"4~+r ~ l l
:..k ~tr ~*~_..`t~:.:.r~.. f, • ~ . ~ i R1~C`+~ U.i ~"T C~+~MJro"J~~'~ ~„'G ~9qQ w ~ . . ! ~ ' ~'J f I ~ ~ t o-~ ~:.,r'' y,,i •.',1•.ti~:.•.. ~ ''s•;~,, f'~ rl~u* t.~ai.tr ' / I .~r-~* t i~- '.`k . • ' , , r / q_ - rL ~ y 7 %L'~ 90rJ~NC pl'H1Y 4~740~ . ~ •r;v ~ - - 2s.. . ~~vr, , . ~~f t ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ a
~ ~ . { 0 ~ 6~ 1 P ~5 4' ' . ' r, JM1 4 ~ GlS It,rP. ►ED-9500 •R7-hs ~;~s~ ~~~4, ~'da ,?~'t r" z~ 6 ~a i I`~ t.,J•~y t, 7- ~ r - I
- ~ ,Y_.• ~ L-'.'g sd; , , . ~ $ 'z' ' ~:1+:f~: ~ , ~ w~ 1t+~ o, ~ w r~ 4{rr' ; -l.o-~~~~ - ~ ~ u~QC~ GF;.^~7C ~ p. i~1-~}+G ~ •-;~C` _ ~ ',7 - ~ ~ a x' ~ '~1 µ ~ ...rw_.. ~`1:2'
'~.'i r~,f a fk ~ ~ ~ ~ C.LC~.7C 4QCPN QCC:F~C 7EA C7. 9:0-~5~A [ 7l2 I • ~,y a i e 1 ~ ~*`a~~~•••r•{~ ~r ~y ~ e~}r:7 CSS;[ S ~ f 1 ~ t ~ti . ~ ..........y ~CLa~1M..i+~e~^'. ~ ~ ~ a1'M.~4f ~PJCT I:S '~I .6,. '.~'r ~I•....... • . ~ ~ ~ l ~ 1, '~~a-.,~~.:, ~ uxt ~i j~ rr~ct
g ~3 ..a . w. ~ . . . n ~~'771 ~ . . - ~ ..~w"Y...~, i L~[ rl ]:0~6C 1"T.r, _ - - . fi~, _ iai ir.+C"• .:7, 7tE~ !:7 ~
~r yy;as , '~n. ~ ~I9 ~ ~ ~ ~ I~5 •~W': "'+i ~ e '1 {~LE* tt~'t hur f* ~ ara.#r ~+~:t u~C~ ~r ~ +l _
9i~54r +f:... G't~l.^.Lt SK"ri k~' ~ , S~•. • ~ 1 i~t a~ri4h {i 3,+L7~7rt0~*.L1 iC~.~.~N+C! 14 iF+i ~ ..Y e~ • - ' - , ''~'t~ ~ ' +I: ~ ~ e~sGOr UMf3 ~ rKL~ •aur~ C.a; ra~r iH~ ~ 3 ~ ~
*+1.7 4' SAOl.kP~1 kkL R:.~+f41wi1 T~[P[ ~wf xC ,,~{i. " ' I t~r^~o+~a i s d~~s~+~a d+.o~a n+ r~cuAs~ o~ ~ _'I ~ ~ ~ r ~.y`~, ~ ; S+~ tY~~. MpS D+YPI+r o► buLP~al 71 STa~Clt~liA rPo7y St4L~'Q f.7d1f 41 7~*1'l , y;}~•, I 1 i
, ' . ~ ~ Fw+o , ~ ~~f • 9.. " ~i ,~~x~ _ L ~
s o[ 0 er ; t . r ti' i ' x 6++,+C M 1 ~ L.l. ~ i 1 r ~ 7 . ,F~P ~ . . . , , ~ ~ . I . 0.5+.LS' . _ , ' ~ ~ ~ I -
1~1~ +L}{. ~ ~M'w 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 , UI t' ~ ~ - - ~ , ~p•,~_a7„y: e~ •~t. ~ ~ 16de~ . _ - 10.a0'~ ~
~ ~ _ ` ~I~~: ~ 1
+'4iwy uea _ H~1T~ ~rrt4UR5 wG 0.[`+~MH3 94t4 Cp Sr:'~N+d ~ ~ PI~ e ' .e u~ L t0urrtr 0~+~+[i.Ri eo.C» wrc tDCATO .t I 53+1'~'•CS'f CAaKLA 0~ ~'.'+1LL F~'C AW
. IfNRTA"J17 /fi~C. Q~S'A~9H.i1dS~d. r~cst; !u. p~rtxrr eaawu~s raA ~,~:t~s ~ ' L' .
d, c, uw o+~[.ar rcc,Ho +~+a n~ a~s~u+cts t~ unm aur~s wc ►~c sdrs ►rs ' r+:u p~ ►4 +lRm wrs roK~nr~ C i 1w0 Bf.~F~CS wfsf ~il:ti4 14 6L CORRiC'! ►5 er h{ p~,,~ ~ny ri C ~ PiR 541RwC7 GfL4 bV~ 11, 1989 !~6 RMSCG T~~rt 4~„~,p~ q.,~ ~,."~„'„~1 rb ~ _ ~
R~. t~~ 19e9 !~q Ux•.t.?~:~^r r,fn' wC~ ~W6 +rPO~9~.'n ►rx t~[ xxa,r►c'r d 5~+4 - AEv15~Cti5 ~ G'~S IT1LC CCUPUrt W rX:nU+G10n, dt 4~1!'~O. ~ ~ R.+LM C rL~GM. ~ L~. GLRT1r~C.+1L h9. 7ved. 7i}!ar Ch~'.~ier".e4 1pe.
tir , S ~,a .~c ~ "i ° i
. ~ ~ UNIVERSiTY {~TY MALL :
. , yy y~. ~ ~ • ^ - ~ .n~+w • a. ' ~ ~,~,t.~ o~rt: ~a . ALTA SURv~Y . . - ~ . rx'C .lyL_ ~ 0 s ~ a1J_ ~Pp: T: ,
~~I _
. ,
be completed within the horizon year of 2000. Primary access to the new, expanded
Rosauers will be from University Road and eastern access locations on Sprague.
Phase II of University City expansion includes renovation of the main building, and the
addition of satellite commercial pads on the north side of the project site along Sprague
Avenue. The additional pads will include three specialty retail stores that, combined with
Taco Bell and Less Schwab, will total 23,415ft2 GFA. The horizon year for the completion
of these pads is 2002. Primary access for these pads will be from Sprague Avenue.
Phase III of the project will be completed simuitaneously with the Valley Couplet. The
third phase of the project includes additional service pads and additional shopping center
area separately located to the west of the main building on the opposite side of Dartmouth
Road. The service pads will add 17,000ft2 GFA to the project site. Land uses are
predicted to be two fast food restaurants, two specialty retail stores, and a drive in bank.
The shopping center will add 72,000ft2 GLA to the project site. Access to these sites will be from Sprague Avenue to the north, Second avenue to the south, University Road to the
East, and Dartmouth Road which divides the eastern quarter area from the main site.
The Valley Couplet is the planned transportation system that will relieve congestion on I-90
and improve capacity between the City of Spokane and the Spokane Valley by using two
high capacity, one-way arterials with moderately high speeds to attract Spokane Valley
traffic. The Valley Couplet is scheduled for completion in 2005. Because of the magnitude
and scope of the Valley Couplet project, there may be significant delays before completion.
If this occurs, then the phase IIT completion of University City will also be delayed.
Therefore, 2010 was chosen as the horizon date for phase TII. This horizon date accounts
for delays that could occur with the Valiey Couplet. This date also mimics the horizon date .
for the Valley Couplet which accounts for couplet volume projections with Spokane
County Engineers. See figure 3 for complete University City shopping center development
with Valley Couplet.
III. Analysis Components
To meet the needs of the analysis, Spokane County Transportation Engineering's asked
that the following components be analyzed to adequately track the progressive impacts of
the project:
~ . 1. Existing Uruversity City access and intersection volumes,
2. Existing University City trip generation;
3. Phase I University -City trip generation;
4. Phase II University City trip generation
5. Phase III University City trip generation
6. Existing University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/LTniversity intersections;
4
- y
~ , ~
4 i ~
. ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ,
4 ; =r ; j ' ~ ~ o I
u ~ly~WUWS~1pNi►wuvu { ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ti~bti~ti-~~ii-i~~ [p ~ ~ ~ r4
k,~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ I • , M1 r + U 77~~~~=p~~dP~} r~~~ ~ ~ ~ I!
E ~ ~ .r~i~~y~~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~
~S ~t ir , ~ r~x~~v~ ~~nar } ~ ~ r
~ ` ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ i } ~ f f' 1 l~I~11 y ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~t~ .
~r~ ~ j I rrr ,
~ ~ i~ 'F ~ , ~ d'~ ~ r r.. ~ ;
- ~ ' ~ __J~ =ti~=-----~` Y-------___________--~►~--.T ; x ~ ~ '1 i - ~
~ f~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , 'F~ I ~ 1 4 ~ . ~ i . i • ~ ~ ~ll ~ + uu~a~u~ u_~ ¢F~p_u~V i u:~a ,
~ ' J , ' ~ 4 ~~q~0444~4~~~~~~u~~4 ~
~ ry~f~1 i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a fr f~~ . Uff~f~I~~f1~~l~T~ ~ti ~ ' t . ...:_'ti;........~!... . ~ ¢ ~ ~~a V ' - . ~ . ~ ~ ~1r11 tiw4~a4ti ti -ti ~ 1 . I M1~~Y { ~ii• 9 ~ •9 , ~ 1 ~
~ ? ~ ~i~ f ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ; ' f'~ ~ . . ~ - - - . s y~~ _
~ = r 1 , ~ ~~►f~ . ~ ~ = ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ GC~ 4490 f OL 446G ~ ~
r- ~1 ~ ~ i~ ~ ~~~l~~i II ~I''~#' i ~~f~~~ . ~ ; ~ ~ r~ ~ Zkkf d ~1 ~j ~r+ Ifi J I i I1111~~ M1~.: I~ fA ti~ d~ ~
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ f ~ ~ ~ .f ,~1~~~~l1~1~~~'t~~~l~~~ ~ ~ _ ' i 3 t r ~
F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~d ~ ~ ~ 38 1~ ~ ~ r - r , h ~ ~ ~ } ' ~ ~2~ti ~ X
. ~ " ~ ~ •1'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w~ ~ ~v; ~ s ~ ~ , ~ D ftl~r~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ . ~ . , .x_ . ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ c
+ ° ~ • 'J ` """"."~LW' ~ .r . ~ . ~ , p
;f." . r_.~ _ ,4 - L--.~ ~ ~~e±pj ht4~y{.a r{~-'~ 1 ~ 1^ ~ r~FMrvC dtiivi y~ rSiT1~T~ a~~xatr•. rtGj~ ~ ~ ~ I' ~ 1~~4Y UlsUfi ~`1~YJ
~ ~ ~ ~rR f _1'~qI~ rt~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ rv ~ ~ 1- ~ ~ ~ ~ ft' _ ~ . . . ~ 1 I~i ~ r ~ ~ ~ ' - .
. „ ' r ~ _ ~ 1 ~1~~ ~I~~~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ f - ~ _ m~ I' . . _ `-z y~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ` - ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~I'~fi~~~~l~i~ ~ E - ~ ~ ~ ~f~~~i~T~~~l~~~~~1~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~~~i1~.~~.~! ' ~ ~ 11111~i1f11lf~~l Y~ -
. ! ° ~l~ii~~fl~~.~.~ I I l1{~~17~f1f11~~~~f ~TITiE~U - ~ ~ ~,1 5~a r.: : _ _ I , I , _ _ ~ + ~ r^ ~ k
~ ~ ~ ~ 2 E ~ iii J ~ ~ . ~f?~~~f~ ►~k~' ~ x~~~ ~ ~ D'~~~~~i~~~i~~l~fi~,f~ = { ~ i i ~
I ~ ~ ~ . ~iil~ll ~~1~ c ~rt } ` . ~ I' ~IiG u : - # y F= ~ = o~ ~ , ~ ~ ' $ o~~~f~ ~ fa ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - G : : _ ~ ~ ;
i~~~ , ~~(111~u~~11~11~1~~11u{1 - , . ~ 4 ~ ~ O~~N~~h~~.~~~ . - . ~ " , , . : - ~ , ..I~
~ ~ _ ~I.~{~~~~~i~Tr~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I - ~ ~ y .Ip ~ ~ 1~\161~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ C ,
I ~ • ~ ~~I~!'~~fi~fi~~F.~ ~ 5, ~F~~ Z ~ Irflff~ - , ; ~g.:~+~ ~ ~i ~ I
~a ~ I ; E= ~~!I~~~~~~~~~ 4 ~ ~~.Ilfllflfi~~ 7 ~~.1 z ~t ~ ~~Ifl~lf~~liif~ ~ ~ ~a~~ : _ ~ ~ ~ .~.~.ax~~ Rn
E~ I: . ~ _i.' J ~ ii -T-~__1t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~,r , • { - - ~
~ 'k f - ~ ~ ~ ~~~y ~~I~~~~~I ~ ~f ~ - ~k~ ~ ~ti~~~ _ J'~✓ ■t. ~ J VuIG ~ ~ t ~.r 4 . I ~ : ~ , L } ~ ~ y ti
, I I 4 + ' - ' • r , ` ~ - • F' ~~~~I~If~~O~ ' ' + , . ~ ~ o~
~ ~ , !~~I : ~ ~ ~ ~~~~f~~~~~~{ ~~~~~~~~~~r ~ ,
s - I: " 111L ~~~II~I~~~ ~ C~~ R~ u~` ~ ; . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ! ~r~ff~r~~ ~ ~~f~lii~~ _ ~ ~ ~~1~j ~ ~ ~
~ } ~ Y ~1 .~Y~iTi~li'Y1~~i~~f~~ r~~y"~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , . x; ~ ' , a t~~~ i ~~f~i}~ ~ . ~ ~
~ ` ~ ~1` (',a ~ r ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ ~.,,.rn.~ ` ; , ~ ~ ~ ~af~~ft~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ , ~i~~ ~ - { f-. ~ - ~ ~ - ~
~ _ ,~~:_~'~~ll~l~~~ _ ~ ~ , wt ~iurr ~ ~ ~ (y~, ~ ~
~i.' ~ : '4's~~ ~ll~k 111I~f:P"~~ _ , I ~.i~,R•q.3~rr,~n ~ :~i ~ ; ~ , ~ ~
4 [~f ~ i ~ ~ ' ~ ~1rmt~Tl~ r= ~ - " ' ~~E 4 4 x ' ' t . . T s
~ ~ ' ~ k J , ~,I1~fl.l,f _ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ . 4 m
~ ~ , ~ 'l `ti~ ~ t~',. I- ~ ~ • • • , ~ ~ ~ 4 : r~
` l _ ~ ~~~f~` ~3 In~, ~ . ~ti ~ ~ ~ i s V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ • 4D ~
~ TI J y~ ti~ ~i .~~~~~'~~~~~1 ~ _ ~
~ ~ ~~7-.. ~ . ~ ~1 ~.~~¢..u.,.u ~ `ti ~ ~ y_ ° _ lT/~11~~J If~~~~T~1~~~11~ .4 ~ ~ ~
, 1 5 )n ~ ~ C' ~ . 't ' ~~4~ ~
~ `~''M " ~ ~ F° " ~~RO ~ r~ ~ I- . , u ~ ~ =r _ ~ p _.z r ' , } ~ T , ~~t~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~U~~~ ? ~
i ~ ~1 7 r Y { i •y ~ ~ . ~ _i
~ ~ ; .k~~ ~~~~~~~~f~~~~~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ u ~ Z~ y ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ 1 k 1 - ~ ~ y
~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ ~s ~~~~1~~•~ ~r ~ ~ ■ P ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ # ~ - ~ - -
~ ~ Ck , ~ ~ pe'~ ~'~r`~~f~ S • ' r, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F 1 ~ ` • L~f~~',rxllC~~ . ~i 'I ~ [
~ , ; ~a ~ ~i~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ kr ~ ~ ~ , r ~
, ~ ~1~~~1~~~~ ' _ , , ~ r ~ f I S~ ~ i r r{r ~ ~ i a ~ ~ l1ll~ l [~1~Ill ~Il ~ ~
~ ~ ; I f i , ~ ~ , f ~ - , ~:~:.__._-.__1__--------- ' i
~ . . _ . . . _ _ _ ~ ~rt~k f15~`~al. Gr ~T Y ~D-~ ~ ~J ~J ~ ] _ ¢ '
~ ~ ~ ~ y y ~ M1r~~i+~e-~ ' I ~ L~r- ~~~~~~~~.~L i
" ~`y'~ ; ~ y{~ , Y4~~ ~ ~ . M~~ ~ ~ ~ n ; ~ 94 • .
~r 1~` 4 a~` 9~; ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ r ~ ~ a•tiR~ ' ~ ,
~r~ ~ ~ t~ ~ , u~ "
~ ~ ~ ~~~i~ ~ ~ 9i,'E~ ~
r v i ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~ p _4 ➢ _
~ ; .cG • ~ + Ft JE DU7V~~~R m EN T PRE,IhI111A11,1' MAw'I'IML SI'lE Pl.AN ~
G~
F3
7. Phase I University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/University intersections;
, 8. Phase II University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Farr and
Sprague/Unlversity intersections
9. Phase III University City P.M. peak hour Level of Service for the Sprague/Fa.rr
Second/Fan, Second/University, and Sprague/University intersections; and
10. Phase III access locations and Levels of Service along Second Avenue.
IV. Data Collection
The following tasks were completed for this threshold analysis:
' A. Background Information
Information was collected to quantify existing University City conditions. This was done
as a baseline for an accurate projection of future traffic volumes, intersection forecasts, and
traffic capacity assessments prior to the proposed expansion. Data for this came from the
following sources:
• University City Existing Alta Survey (completed by Taylor Engineering, Inc. in
1989);
• Manual traffic counts for existing P.M. access volumes observed August 6, 1997;
and
• Manual observation and sketches of roadway channelization, roadway
configuration, intersection configuration, and intersection traffic control device
location and coordination.
B. Existing Traffic Conditions
EXisting intersection mall trip generation, and driveway access volumes were required.
They determine present-day University City conditions with, and without, the addition of
i the Valley Couplet. These are used as a basis of comparison for future traffic impacts that
the expanded shopping center would create upon the traffic nettivork. The sources for this
information were collected or produced as follows:
'
• Intersection traffic counts provided by 1996 Spokane County surveys;
' • Manual traffic counts for existing mall accesses; and
• Institzrte of Transportatron Engrneers Trip Generatron (Six Edrtion, 1997), or
I.T.E. Trip Generation for land use 820, 814, 834,and 848.
C. Phase I, II, and III Traffic Conditions
Predicted traffic conditions were derived to assess the impacts that the redeveloped
shopping center would have upon the traffic network. Most of the data was generated
from existing information except for the following intersection and trip generation sources:
6
• Valley Couplet Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement completed in
May 1997;
• University City Redevelopment Master Site Plan, and
• Ij7sliltrle of lrcrnsporlation Engifreers Il'1p GGI?e/"CitlOjl (Six Edition, 1997), or
, I.T.E. Trip Generation for land use 820, 814, 834, 848, 850, and 912.
V. Existing Conditions A. Existing Transportation System
The boundary streets and access characteristics of University City are described below.
Sprague Avenue is a major east-west principal arterial linking Spokane City to the
1 SPokane ValleY. The street PresentlY has three lanes in each direction of traffic flow. There
is an intermittent lane providing concrete-protected left turns into University City at
specific locations. Spra~ue Avenue accesses the North side of University City at seven
different locations. One of the locations is signalized. This signalized access begins at
Spraguue Ave. and terminates within the confines of University City. The access is a T-
intersection and allows a full range of turning movements.
Three of the remaining six accesses allow west bound vehicles to make left turns into
' University City. These three accesses also allow for vehicles to make left-turns from
University City onto Sprague Avenue and travel west. All accesses allow right turning
vehicles to and from Sprague avenue (right in - right out).
University Road has three southbound, and two northbound lanes of traffic spanning north
to south with an intermittent, concrete protected lane allowing turning movements along
most of the University frontage with the arterial. The three southbound lanes narrow to
two lanes after the southern extents of University City. The four-way intersection, of
University Road and Sprague Avenue allows for all turning movements. University City is
, presently accessed by three driveways along University Road. The access to the north
allows for south-bound vehicles to enter and exit the University city parking facility by way
of right-turns. The middle access allows for southbound vehicles to enter and exit by right
' turns> and allows north-bound> left-turn entrances. The south access allows full turning
movements for north-bound and south-bound entrances and exits.
Dartmouth Road is presently a lightly used, two-way, two-lane, north-south comdor
intersecting Sprague Avenue on the southern side of University City. The road terminates
at the southern University City property line. There are three accesses to University City
and three accesses to Village Square from this road. The two northern-most accesses for
both locations allow permitted turning movements to and from their respective locations.
The southern accesses, respectively, allow turning movements to travel either direction
from southbound traffic. See Figure 2 for existing shopping center boundaries, access
locations, and signalization location.
7
B. Project Trip Generation Presently, University City is not operating at maximum capacity due to significant
vacancies. With 4302685ft2 GFA, University City is only producing 638 evening peak
hour(P.M. peak) trips, with 287 trips entering and 351 trips exiting the site. Figure 4
displays all access volumes, and the projected 1998 intersection volumes for the
Sprague/Farr and Sprague/University intersections.
To meet Spokane County guidelines, the maximum number trips generated by the shopping
center was needed. The ma:cimum number, or the critical volume, was obtained from the
Institarte of Trafzsportation Engifieers Trip Generatiofz (Six Edition, 1997), or I.T.E. Trip
Generation. This reference is the nationally accepted compilation of traffic counts, surveys,
and historical data that give expected trip generation for land uses based upon factors such
as gross leasable area, number of employees, occupied rooms, etc.
Trip generation was determined for the P.M. peak hour of 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. in the
evenin~. The P.M. peak may or may not be the shopping centers hijhest production of
trips in the average day. It is, however, the time for the highest potential conflict between
work trips and shopping trips. RepoR analysis is also based upon the average time of the
year. Christmas is always the peak season for shopping center. Because shopping trips are
discretionary and work trips are not, average P.M. peak generation rates will be used to
assess shopping center impacts.
Critical volumes for University City shopping center was determined by land uses 820, 814,
8342 and 848 from I.T.E. Trip Generation. The existing shopping center(land use 820),
Village Square(land use 814), Taco Bell(land use 834), and Less Schwab(land use 848) all
produce different rates of trip per 1000ft2 in the P.M. peak hour. These rates, when
combined, determine the overall volume for the existing project. The critical Volume for
the shopping center was 1722 trips based upon 430,685ft2 GFA. This projects an overall
48% entering and 52% exiting maximum shopping center distribution during the P.M. peak
' hour. A table of results is as follows.
Table 1: Trip Generation for Existing Universit,y City,
' Land Use Size(ft'") %in/Out Entering Leaving Total
Shopping Center 820 390,000 48/52 741 trips 803 trips 1544 trips ~
9e-CfVillage Square 814 32,000 43/57 36 trips✓ 47 trips 83 trips ✓
w/ Dr.Zaco Bell 834 2,000 52/48 35 trips v 32 trips 67 trips''
,
Less Schwab 848 62685 42/58 12 trips✓ 16 trips 28 trips
Total 430,685 48/52 824 trips 898 trips 1722 trip
C. Existing Trip Distribution
The existing trip access location distribution is a combination of I.T.E. Trip Generation
entrance and exit distribution, and established traffic movement distribution observations
3
- - - ~ • ~ - ~ ~
, '
-P~ ~
~ ~ , F A R R l ~,7 \
` ~ ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1.~ t r-r ~p ~J
~l ~ r
~ ~ti ~ ~ . ~l ~l] ~ (1 « U~?/~ ~
U~ ~ ~ r~ I
~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (s~ ~ ~
Rl - ~r~}
~ f~ ~ ~
~ f~ ~s r: ~ ~ ~
~ " ~ , A
~ ~ti ~ t_.•,
~ K~~~ ~f ~ ; ~ ~ , ~ fr ~ ~~d5~ ~f f~t.
~ ~u f , ~
~ D A ~ T~II~ D U TH F . ~ ~ ~ , ~ L~1~ ~ ~ , ~ . r ~ ~
~ ` .
~1,
~ ~
. ~ ~ J]
~ ~ ~,'i Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ~
~ ~
~]r~ . ~L ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ BALFO~IR ~R~.
~ ~ ~ C~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~1, ~ ~ . . ! C~ RAYM~ND ~'d. c~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ A
, ~ ~ ~ _ , .
~ _ _ .1-~ . , ~7
~
~ , ~ , , t : T i 3 I
~ t ~
U~111E~~ITY ' ~
~yi ~ - ~ ~ ~ 1
~ Ui ~ Lf~ ~'r ~.r< < I~J ~
i ~ CC~ f
~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~
R~ ~ +1 ryL' . 7
~ f ~ ~ _ fr ~-rr
~ ' 't . ~
l I ,
` 1\\\
~ \ f ~j ~ ~
~
F~~f ~ 1 J~ ` ~ ~ ~
~ {•1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~~~ ~~-'~ti ~ j1
' r 5 i~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,i ~ f ~J ~ ~
~ ~ ~~i ~ r,,~ CO
f~,l ~ ~
~ . ~ ~ ~[Jl - ~ , . 4.,1 ~ ` iS7 3 ~ ~ C,! `L • f~ ~ J'`~r ~ ~.i]I n 'f I - + 1 a + } - - - -
~ ~ ~1+ ~ ~ ~ ~t' ~i f~ ~ ?
~ 0~ ~ ~
~ ~ n ~ ~
, ~ ~ j,i~
.f' ~ f ~ ~ ` ~1 CC,
~1:. ~ _
r` r ~`.~y
:~~:I~~L~:: _
ir1~ rl,r~,yl~~a, Lr~~x~~~~rii~~, I1-~c. 1~r~r~~
■ ~'i~ri~ I~nnirr~'~ 9l1~~ ~ 717f1 ~~~!.IA115111❑ I I~Vf`.I~
LlviI i t;.rA 6 A .rF& ....o., . ~ + IV, 1~)~ MIS510 ti !~L'(?. ,
F4 S>>d~lti~M~yr,, llasliingl,on 99?D1 ' (509) Td11-3371 FAX (509) 328-6224 ~
EXISTING 1998 IIOLUMES UVITHOUT DE'VELOPMENT ~4:15 TO 5:1 ~5 PEAK HOUR uNIvERsirY cIrY
~ ~ REDEVEL4PMENT ~
II'k I.11 *~rll+r~~'t~~ •
~
- ' I
'
completed August 6, 1997. The I.T.E. Trip Generation gives entrance and exit patterns for
each individual land use. Once a number of trips is established, the entering and exiting trip
percentages can determine the number of vehicles entering and leaving a site, and thus an
intersection. A observed pattern of trip dispersal is the basis for which these entering and
exiting trips were distributed at the access locations. For example, at access point A1 on
Figure 4, the distribution of trips is 25% east bound entrance, 35% east bound exit, 27%
west bound exit, and 13% west bound entrance. The additional entering and exiting trips
at that access due to I.T.E. trip generation were dispersed according to the 25%-35%-
27%-13% pattern previously observed.
The next step is to subtract the maximum generated,, distributed trips from the existing
1998 trips. This accounts for the trips that were already observed in the previous
intersection analysis. This step negates the doubling of existing trips in the analysis.
Intersection tendencies were determined by examination of traffic patterns derived from
manual counts completed by Spokane County Engineers. Increased volumes were then
distributed and added to appropriate intersection volumes. After entrance and exit
directions for each access was determined, intersection volumes could be distributed based
upon established patterns. For instance, existing eastbound traffic on Sprague Avenue and
Farr Road is split, with 1% of vehicles turning south, 92% of vehicles continuing east, and
7% of vehicles turning north. This 1%-92%-7% distribution pattern was used to predict
how additional eastbound traffic at this intersection becomes distributed after further trip
generation is created. It is a reasonable assumption since there are no major changes in
surrounding land uses and growth in the area is assumed to be uniform around the site.
' The Existing 1998 Volume figure, or figure 4, shows the present, 1998 configuration of
Uruversity City without renovation, expansion, or the addition of the Spokane Valley
Couplet. Accesses are labeled with an "A" and a number(signifying a particular access).
Intersections are marked on the figure with an "L", then a number, signifying a signal
location. All movements allowed at each access and intersection are displayed. The peak
hour volumes per movement are also displayed.
~
The maximum, full occupancy volumes(based upon 100% occupancy) which could be
generated by the existing University City is shown in fijure 5. The access volumes show
~ the distribution of 1,722 triPs to and from the project. The adjusted intersection volumes
are a result of these full occupancy volumes; of 1,722 trips, minus the 638 existing trips
from actual counts. This was done to adjust the current, allowable full occupancy level
trips not previously accounted for in the Existing 1998 Volume scenario. All the owner.
,
would need to do is lease out 100% of the existing facility, and these volumes would result.
D. Existing Intersection Analysis
Level of Service, LOS, is a term used to describe the functionality of a traffic situation.
The Highway Capacity Manual defines LOS as the qualitative measures that characteriie
operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perceptions by motorists. There are
10
- . . ~ -
~ . ~
~ I ~ 1 i
~ ~ 1 ~ ' ,
~ r~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ f ~ 1,5 I ~ , I `y ~ ~ U
i \ . , ,k I ~ ` ~ ~
~ _ 1 . J V ~ 1 - ' . .
~ ~ ~ ~ r% ~ 'l~ \ ~ ~ , ~ ~ -1 . ~ k ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ r` .r F r ~ i ~ a: ~ „
, , k~ t ti l ~ + i~ 1 f ~ t ~ , ! , F ~ , , i ~Li _
~ ~ff~ o ` ~ ~ . ~ A ' ~ ~ • ~ 4'~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ _ ~ ~ L. i - I ~ r~ , i ~ ~
~~'o ~ I ~ \l~, I , ' ~ 1 t ~ _ ~ ~ f ; ~ `'"I , . . - ~ ❑ ~ ~
1 ~ ~h "'f 't : 4 f ~ i ~ f~ ' ` ' ~ ~ ~ t ~ , r ~ 1 ~ ' ~ j f ~ ~
.r • ~ ~ J ~ l '~r 1 ~1 L! l1 ` ' ~ ~ f ~ ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ r. ~
, ~ ~ • ~ - ~ , . ~ 5 7 ~ ' ~ / -7 ~ ti 1 1 ~ ` ~ ^ ; ~ ~ ~ f 4 1 ~ _ _`7 ~
r ? ~ 3U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ L1J
' j ~ ~ i . y ~.y(~Ji r ~ r `L I~ y / ~ r ? ~ ~ ~ t ~ - ~ 1 1 4k~ f v ~ , . i 4 " _ _ ~ ~
I`'•7~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ . . e 4~ ~ 1.~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ , , ~ti r~.' ~ i i I ....J
, r • l . ~ ! ~ ~ , ' . 1 ~ / ~ ~l ~ ~ , } I~ ~ C~ , , 1 ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ r _ . ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ -f fi ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , / ~ ~ ~ ~ r}~ry i 1 ~ l, i ~ ~ ~ L! ~ l + ~
10~ ~ ~ 7.. , , ~ ~ a~ ,y , ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ s : ~J i ~r , ~ ~ + ~ ~ , _ e 1
I• ~ ~ l ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ G, ~ , ~ ~ 7• ~ i ~ . J ~ n • I ~ ~ r i i ` f 1' J ~ ~ ~ r~ 1 ~ r ' ~ t ' . ;
~ ~ ~J ~ ~I ti 51 ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ , ~ . ~ ' r "7 r , ~F I f 14J~ ~~C~ ~ 16• - _ ~
85 ~ r , a ~ ~ r l . 4 '1 ~ ~ ~ k. ~ ~ y
r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 , r ~ ~ ~ ~ J 1~ ~ ~ f ! ii , : , ~ ~ , 1
. 7 ~ - ~ ~ a 1~~/ i ~ ~ °r^ li ~ r ~
~ + ~ r k ~ ~ 4 r 1 r •s j I 4 ~ - - ~ ~ - - - -
e ~ 9 r ' , . # f ~
~ ~ i e • : :
~ ~ ~ k~ ~ ~ ' . r ~
I ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ - . / ~ I ~ i i
. ° ~ 1' 0 ~ ~I \ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ F
' , D~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ r ~
~ = ~ - ~ - ~ ~l ~ i' 1
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 1 ■
~ t., 0 1 ~ ~ W ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~,,~v r~ ~ ~ U" - 1 ~ ~ ~ "_I ~ ~
~ , ~
ry
/ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
i \ 4
• l ~ ti`~ r. ~ ~L~7
. ~ . , , , . ,l f+ n•
rn ti ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. .
a • ~ ~ . . `
~ . ~ n~~~-, - i - '
~
!J
~ • I
~ . Lit
- ~
+..i a_
. - ~
+ L~
'
six levels of LOS ranging from A to F, with A denoting the best LOS, and F denoting the
worst LOS.
'
For intersections, LOS is a function of the volume over capacity (V/C) ratio, or stopped
delay per vehicle. The stopped delay per vehicle describes the waiting time that a particular
vehicle must endure before clearing a critical point or intersection. For this study,
intersection delay will be used to describe the levels of LOS at intersections.
Table 2: Intersection LOS Descriptions
LOS Delay (sec/veh) Interpretation
A 5 Little or no vehicle delay.
'
B >5 and< _ 15 Good vehic1e progression with light congestion.
.
C >15 and 5 25 Fair progression with occasional backups and some congestion.
D >25 and 40 Unfavorable progression with noticeable congestion.
E >40 and 60 Poor progression reaching the limit of acceptable delay.
F >60 Failure in the system with limited progression and high
congestion.
Source: Highway Capacity vlanual (Transportatian Research Board, 1994)
~ Existing intersections important to this site include Sprague Avenue/Farr Road, and
Sprague Avenue/University Road. Intersection counts for Sprague Avenue and Farr Road,
and Sprague Avenue/University Road were obtained from Spokane County sources.
To obtain existing 1998 intersection volumes, the 1996 traffic counts were projected by
two years based upon Spokane County Engineers arterial growth equations that can be
found in the reference section of this document. These arterial growths were then
distributed at intersections using the same trip distribution process described above. Next,
the present full occupancy volume for University City was added and distributed to the
~ intersections. The existing and present full occupancy intersection volumes are shown in
figures 3 and 4. Intersection projections through 2010 are provided in Appendix 1 of this
' report.
LOS were determined for each intersection for comparison with predicted volumes for
- phase I and II of the redeveloped University City without the Valley Couplet. This
shoppin~nter to be viewed against predicted traffic volume
~
permitted the impacts of the ce
increases. The LOSs were derived by use of the Highway Capacity Mamtal Software:
Release 2e by the Transportation Research Center at the University of Florida.
The overall intersection LOS for the maximum 1998 volumes at Sprague AvenuelFarr
Road was a B rating. The overall intersection LOS for Sprague Avenue/University Road
was a C rating. This is in comparison to a Sprague Avenue/Farr Road LOS B and Sprague
Avenue/LJniversity Road LOS C without maximum trip generation. There is no difference
in overall LOS between the existing scenario, and projected present full occupancy
generation scenario. As stated above, this implies fair traffic progression with occasional
12
,
backup, and some congestion. The rattngs are acceptable according to current Spokane
County criteria. All intersection Highway Capacity analysis can be viewed in appendix 2.
'
VI. Phase I and II Conditions
A. Phase I and II TrAnsportation System
Phases I and II add land use to the base year 2000 and 2002 scenarios. No arterial changes
, would have occurred by this time. The existing arterial descriptions shown above still
apply to phases I and II.
B. Phase I and II Trip Generation
The existing year 2000 and 2002 base scenarios, or figures 6 and 8 respectively, show
projected increased traffic volumes from the Existing 1998 Volumes figure. The projections
are derived from Spokane County Engineers growth equations that can be seen in the
reference section of this report. There is no development or maximum trip generation
shown on the figures. The projections themselves, through the year 2000, can be viewed in
appendix 1. Trip generation was determined assuming the P.M. peak hour to be 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. as
the probable peak and evening rush hour. It is the time for the highest potential conflict
between home bound work trips and shopping trips. Report analysis is also based upon the
average time of the year.
The Maximum 2000 and 2002 Volumes scenarios for phase I and II, shown in figures 7 and
9 respectively, are the combination of existing 2000 and 2002 volumes plus I.T.E. Trip
generation volumes for the additional land uses. In phase I, 40,000ft2 of the east side of the
t main building was remodeled and expanded to house a 51,300ft2 GFA Rosauers
supermarket. Land use 850 in the I.T.E. Trip Generation describes supermarket land use
and how to calculate Rosauers 560 additional trips to the shopping center. This predicts
r an overall 49%-51 % entering and exiting maximum shopping center distribution. A table
of results is as follows:
Table 3: 2000 Trip Generation for Phase I University City
Land Use Size(ft'") %in/Out Entering Leaving Total
1998 Total table 2 table 2 48/52 824 trips ~..~898 trips 1722 trips
' ~ r~ps rs 850 51 ,300 51/49 ~,,.286 trips ~~74 trips 560 triP
A~y,skRosaue
Total 4389143 49/51 1110 trips 1172 trips 2282 trips
Phase II includes the addition of 14,730ft2 GFA of Specialty Retail. Land use 814 in the
I.T.E. Trip Generation describes specialty retail stores. We project 39 additional trips P.M.
peak to the shopping center after phase II completion in 2002. This results in an overall
49%-51 % entering and eaciting maximum shopping center -distribution. A table of results is
as follows:
13
~
• • ~ ' t 0 1
r~f ~ ~ • ?
~ 77
c~ .
° . ~ ~
O
uis~13niNn
~
.
. ~
'08 aNOMd8 - U z
O
F-
*a 8nojide v~ v
w o
~ -
>J
~ z
D
i CN
G) \
~~1 Hl (10 Wl Nd a
: L. ~
I o
I ! .
' r.i ~ ; . w
~
~ 1 ✓ - ~ ¢
! , r
v LLI .
i L ) ~ '
~ . a ~
(n
I.,,L
14
, z = L=:
i i i Taylor Enaineei•inc, Inc. ;rTE:
~ I Civil Desion and Land Planning :.L~
W. 106 Stissiun :1.•e.
. Spokane, Wayhinaton 9920L
I_~O~J) J'=8-3:171 Fa.~C (509) 3'~8-8'~'-~
1
~
2000 I N TERSECTI ON VOLU M ES UNIVERSITY CITY
REDEvELOPMc
WI TH 0U T REDEVELOPM EN T NT
'
:AZ~J ACC_:S f1:.A1G -
I ~
~
_ ~ ~ ~ , ` ,
/ 4 ,
l I ~1 ~ Ld
i 1 ~ ~ i I ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ I ~ I~ ~ I o, LLJ
~7w 8 ~ Cr ~ 7 u / ~ W > > W '
~ f V , . ✓ ~r f ~ , , L ~ Q ~ I . 1 - D oC
'I ~ ~ ! ~ - . ~ ~ ~w7 ~ ~
. ~ , ~ ; ~ ~ 7 , , ~ ~ , ~ ~ t~ ~a ~ ~ i ~ ~1 ] f 7 ~
, ~ • L' 7 ' ~
` ~ L+ 7 i ~ ` ~ ~f'~ ~ ~ ~+y~
V r ~ ' I If}f 4..L I ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ • w~
~ I ~ ~ ~ r' I ~y I ~ 1 4 ~ <J
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ L.L I ~ , 3G ~o ~ ~7 i ~J ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ r ~ ~ rR ~ I~~4~ C~~3~Q , ~
- ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ `r , , , ~ / J ~ ~ C1 . ry
~ ~ i~ ~ ~ 1 I 1 a r 8.S 1 ~ ~ ~ . 0
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 06 ~ 7 ~ ao. ~ ~ Lii 0~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ JG ' 'r '
- ~ ~ ~,J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'-r L~ ~j • 1 G~~~~~y , ~ y
C';~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ 1 ~ c~ ~ 4 r L ~ ~ ,Y ~ ~J~ ~ ~ . , ~ .
~ ~ L c: ~ . 1 , ~
~ 1, r. ~ ~ ~ c ~ - ~ ~ . .r p k~^ f t . J r~`yI 1 Cl , ~.,f~ ~ ~ ~
1~ ~J ~ r`j ~r 4 y , f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N fln • ~ ~ 1:4 -,:G LO
. ~ V, r ~ ~ . ~ f ~ / !'l n V f ~ r
. , ` M ~ L i • r y r,y ~ w • LC)
, + f/ ~ 1 n ~ ~R y f ~S ~ ~ f l Hy un ~ ej L_ c , ~ ~ ~ r' ~ - V) LL) 0
L~ .rr ~ ~ r~ ~J ~ P i^1 ~ • ~ ~ ~ X ~
~ I A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ V 4I u ~i ~
~ A~ ~ .r. ~ ~ r~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ .r ~ ' r . ~ Lo
r~ ~ •V 4~ ~ \ ~ , r ~ - ~ ~ , t ~ L,^,' rt ~
~ ~ ~ - L~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ `1 ~ ~ C) '
~ 1 1 `~l , i~ ~ ~ ~ W M~ C ~ f,
~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ . ~
, ~ ~ - ~ _ C~ -
~ ~ ~ , w , * r f ~ W
' C~ ~ ~ ~ . ,y. ~ ~ x
I ~ ~ + w
~ ~ , ~ , I
' , ~r rl 7 j ~ 1 ' ~ ~ 1
~ ~ , ~ , . , ~ r ~ 1 ~ , L
~ f 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~1 \
~ ~c ~U, ~ U ti`k 1 + J` ~
I ~ I I ' 'i ~
~ • W J . i LL I
• , n.l ~f7 `wy ,
~ } ~ 4 i ~ ~ ~3 ; ,
r ~ _ r . 15
~ ' ~
k
i•'
/ l.(-)
QD
c)
7,-
C\! ~
L
Cl I ~ ~ ~ Cn
O r=~
~ GJ) 0 JWS~13nINf1
~
'ad aNOWJId8 U z
~ O
. F--
'a8 8f10jib'8 ~
ry U > O
.
~ z
~
- ~
Hu.now.ima
o
1 C-►
~ ~ _
Z'l co Q
LL,
D
¢
co
LJL
16
SCALE:
i~i Tay'lor Enoineerind, Inc. DATE.
' Civil Desion an(t Land F'lannino D'+i
W. 106 ~lission A~•e.
Spokane, Washin;ton 99201
(-509) 328-3:371 Fa.`i (309) 328-8224
2002 I N TER SECTI ON VOLU M ES UNIVERSITY CITY
WITHOUT REDEVELOPMENT REDEvELOPMENT
:aCO ar_ESS :irmE
I ~
~
, , ~
~ . . ~
j ~ ~
~ , • ~ ' ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ I ~ , ~ ;
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . , ~
~ I ~ ' ~ i
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ - ` ~ + r L-L
~ a / 1 i ~ _ / ~ ~ i ~ 4 j ~.";f' . . I y!' 4 r ; LLJ
~ ~ 7 7 , w ~ r ~ ~ ; ~ f i 'ti ~ ~ ; 1 , LLJ~
° f . - ` % r ~i , 1 ' L., , , ~d' ~ ~ti , ' ~ ~ > ' -C~
~ ~ 0 ~ - / ~ ~ : ~ ' ~ ~ t ~ ti ~t ~ ~ ti~~ I < L:.i ~
, ~ , , " r^ ~ + ' f ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ „ r ~~f 1 ~
' ~ - ~ 1 • ~ l. l s ~ I r, ~ ~ i / I 1 ~ ~ • ~ , r L~ . ~ ~ ti ~ ~ f~ ~1 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ JI r, , ~ ti „ ~ ~ ° / 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ - ~ ❑ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ f ~ + w ~ 7 c~ . ~ 51 ~ i _ < LLI
i r ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +i ~ ~ , y~, . ~ . , ~ ~ ti r ~ C-L
~.J J r. 1 ~ f I..L r r ~ J r-, , ~ 1~ r ~ ~ t ~ ~ r OI i ~ ~yy r.a ~ r/ Lli J
' I ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 I ~ ' ! % 1~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~ 5 v C`~ ~ 7 s ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ I.~ ~ r . C) 0
~ ' i + ~ ~ 6.L . ~ ti l ~ ~ ~ ~ r 1 ~ t ~ r 1 - - J ~ ~ s~ , cr- ~J ~ ~ .
~ 12 8 7 \ 1 C~ ;:i l / / f i~« 1~, ~ : ~ . ~ ~ ~ i : ~ti. , ~ ~ .J IM , . ,
~ ~ j . + ~ , , ~ i`,, C I ~ r ~ ~ f ' 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ y~ 'i ~ r ' ~ l~ J f ~ J,1` [J7 0 ~ C) ~
V ~ ~ ~ I '4 15 ~ ~ . ! f . I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 37 ~ ~ ~ . ~ r"' r- ~ r^ T ~ ~ r ~ _ I ~ ~ : -
~ ~ o r~ - ~ 6 a ~ ~ ~ , ~ y ~ . c LLJ w .
~r 'w ~ r 1 ~ , . , , c.~ r ~ ~ r ~ ~5 . . ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , - ~ _ ~ ! ~ cn ~
` ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ` . ~ ,:f~
y '~~t ,r` . ' ~ ~ ' i ~ L ~ r ~ r ~t~~~ 1 ~8 r ~ ~ •r ~En L.LJ 0- ~ Y ~ CL
. ~ LJ ~ ~ i , ~ C r ~ r-+ ° ~ .f Ln
~ ~ ; ; ~ ;.y ~ ` : ~ ~ ~ . n.~.~ y • F ^ ~ ` ~r J
, tiy F ..i i ~ y ~ ~
. ~ . ~T~ i F ' - f I . ,
, J ~ ~ ~I ~ ti ~ I 7 ~ ~ 1"'1 L:4 , t ~ . ~ . zi. LiJ ~ Lii
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
r.~'' y. , ~ ~ ~ ` ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ J ~ ri
f~/ hI ~ ~ ~ LL ~ l + ~ ~ {y ~ ~
~ ~~y LJ w / 1 " 4 ~ ~v' ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ' ~ I
i ~ ~ ~ r ~ - I~- ~ L,~! ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _I r~ ~ _ CN LLJ
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , - ~ Q
~ ~ ❑ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i ' ~'ti ~ ~ ~ , ~ , .,~t , ~4 ` ~
, / 'I' ~ ~ ' J i
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ < C L
~ ~ , , I '',i~ , . `~1 i
~ , « ~ : , . ~~4
. ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ << ' 1, ~ L / ` f'~~. o ; - , ~,d~ f. ~ ~ r , 1
' ~ /r~y rti ~i J.1+ ~ ~
. ~J . : '~1 ~f ~ } • ~ ' ~
~ ~l i ~ CF)
~ ~ `J ~ ~ - ~ e ~ ~y ` ~.t J ~ LL
. 1 '1 { ~ i 1 ~ ~ \h !
I , \ f ~ '11 L~ / i.
~ ~ ~ 17
I j ~ . I
, i 1_
,
Table 4: 2002 Trip Generation for Phase II University City
Land Use Size(ft) %in/Out Entering Leaving Total
2000 Total see above 4382143 49/51 1110 trips 1172 trips 2282 trips
Specialty Retail 814 141730 43/57 17 trips 22 trips 39 trips
Total 452,873 49/51 1127 trips 1194 trips 2321 trips
C. Phase I and II Trip Distribution
Traffic distribution for Phase I and II expansions for the redeveloped University City
shopping center follows the methodology described with the 1998 scenario. Because of the
limited physical change to the network for the 2000 and 20002 scenarios, the dispersal
patterns are assumed to be the same. Once again, access distribution is a combination of
I.T.E. new land use trip generation entrance and exit volumes and distributed according to
observed access dispersal patterns. The increased P.M. peak access trip distribution, when
determined, is then distributed at each intersection by a directional percentage based upon
Spokane County Engineering traffic counts.
D. Phase I and II Intersection Analysis .
The overall intersection LOS for year 2000, phase I Sprague Avenue and Fan Road was a
B rating. The projected existing 2000 year Sprague and Farr without phase I remained at
LOS B. The overall intersection LOS for year 2000, phase I Sprague Avenue and
University Road was a D. The year 2000 LOS for the intersection without phase I was a
C. The LOS for the intersection would drop one level. Spokane County criteria states that
a LOS D acceptable. No mitigation is required for this change.
The volumes for Phase II did not change the LOS results from the respective 2000
scenarios. Once again, the LOS are all within accepted Spokane County standards. All
intersection Highway. Capacity analysis can be viewed in appendix 2. A summary 1998,
2000, and 2002 LOS results is shown on the next page:
'
i
, 1g
~
,
Table 5: LOS Intersection Scenario Results
Scenario Intersection Intersection LOS
Existing Counts (1998) Sprague & Farr B Existing Counts (1998) Sprague & University C'
Maximum Counts (1998) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Counts (1998) Sprague & University C Existing Phase I(2000) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Phase I(2000) Sprague & University C
Maximum Phase I(2000) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Phase I(2000) Sprague & University D
Existing Phase II(2042) Sprague & Farr B Existing Phase II (2002) Sprague & University C
Maximum Phase II (2002) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Phase II (2002) Sprague & University D
VII. Phase III and Build Out Conditions
Phase III and complete build out of University City is scheduled to occur simultaneously
with the completion of the Valley Couplet. Presently, the Valley Couplet is scheduled for
completion in 2005. As described earlier, 2010 was used as the horizon year for this
project to effectively avoid possible delays that might occur with the Valley Couplet. The
analysis described below, shows that 2010 University City will not cause unacceptable
levels of service within the study areas.
A. Phase ffi and Build Uut Transportation System
Sprague Avenue, west of University Road after the implementation of Phase I of the
Valley Couplet project, will be a five-lane, one-way, west-bound arterial with an added
high occupancy vehicle(HOV) lane in the same direction. This is a represents a 40%
' increase in the directional lane capacity of the arterial not including the capacity of the
HOV lane. Access to University City and the new remote pads will have been reduced to
five locations from the original seven locations in cooperation with the Spokane County
request for limited access. Conflict will still occur in the outer lanes of Sprague road, but
the number and severity of conflicts will decrease due to one way only travel. Sprague
Avenue remains the existing 6 lane, two-direction arterial east of University Road during
this first phase of the Valley Couplet project. University Road will maintain the same configuration with the exception of channelization
adjustment near Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue to compensate for one-way travel.
At this time, lane allocation and channelization have not fully been addressed for the Va11ey
Couplet project. Based -upon the nature of the high volumes directed north to reach
Sprague Avenue where it once again accommodates east-bound vehicles, we assumed two
north-bound lanes to accommodate tra.ffic volumes. This assumption was made from the
Valley Couplet EIS produced by the Spokane County
19
Second Avenue is the other component of the Valley Couplet Project. This new road will
allow five lanes of east bound, one way, traffic. This increases the current Sprague Avenue
east bound lane capacity by 40%. The new, one way Second Avenue will grant significant
access to the south side of University City. Conflicting movements will occur in the outer
lanes near retail accesses on the north side of Second Avenue.
Dartmouth Road will be remain an access for the westerly one-third of University City,
but will be extended to connect Sprague Avenue and Second Avenue. Dartmouth will access much of the redeveloped University City as well as carry turn around traffic, traffic Ao
that wishes to access the opposite side of University City, and emergency vehicles. There
will be significant conflicting vehicle and pedestrian movements on this two lane road
within the mall property; however, the Valley Fire Station (District 1) prefers this route
stays open. Figure 3 displays the site.
B. Phase IXI and Build Out Trip Generation
The Valley Couplet EIS performed by the Spokane County Traffic Engineer's was the
source for 2010 existina intersection volumes. These intersection volumes can be seen in
figure 10. The I.T.E. Trip Generation volumes produced by the built out University City
was added to the 2010 existing volumes to produce the Maximum 2010 Volumes scenario
shown in figure 11.
The Maximum 2010 Volumes are a combination of 1998 full occupancy, phase I, phase II,
and phase III trip generation. In phase III, 72,000ft2 GFA of additional shopping
center(land use 820), 10,000ft2 GFA of specialty retail(land use 814), 2 fast food
restaurants with 4,500ft2 GFA(land use 834), and a 3000ft2 GFA drive-in bank(land use
912) are being added to the site. This brings ihe totals the project area to about S 10,00Oft2
GFA. the has total I.T.E. Trip Generation is 2,649 P.M. peak trips with a calculated
distribution of 49% entering and 51 % exiting trips. The breakdown of the trips is as
follows:
'
Tabte 6: 2010 Trip Generation for Build Out Universit,y City
Land Use Size(ft'") %in/Out Entering Leaving, Total
Shopping 820 418,158 48/52 775 trips 839 trips 1614 trips
Center
5 Specialty 814 2411730 43/57 29 36 65
Retail
Taco Bell 834 23,000 52/48 35 trips 32 trrps 67 trips
Less Schwab 848 62685 42/58 12 trips 16 trips 28 trips
2 Fast Food 834 42500 52/48 79 trips 72 trips 151 trips ✓
Bank 912 3,000 50/50 82 trips 82 trips 164 trips v
Rosauers 850 511300 51/49 286 trips 274 trips 560 trips
Total 510,373 49/51 1298 trips 1351 trips 2649 trips
20
.
~ _ .
' J \
,
rj p0
r• ~ ~
~
co 0
.
nc,
~ C)
. ~ uis83niNn ~ .
~
'08 aNOMt/8 U z
~O
'a8 bflOj-lbB ~ U
W 0
>
Z ~
~
Hunowwida
~
r~
C(D
oc.
~
- > ( (:1 W ~ ~ lL^ = 1
w
D
z
1 Q 0
. ~ w vj .
~ ~
..`i N .
88d~
. CD
i r-
LL
N •
~%'i Tay-lor Enoineerino, Inc.
Civil Design and Land Planning ~VlP1~
A. 106 Mis9ion Ave.
Spokane. washinrton 99201
(309) 328-9371 F.1.Y (509) 928-8224
2010 I N TER SECTI ON VOLU M ES UNIVERSITY CITY
WITHOUT REDEVELOPMENT REOEVELOPMENT
~ •:aGO %C^_Eni NAuE.
\ .
.
21
- - - • - - - - ~
~ ,
I~ ~,~i ~
i = <<~~ ~ FARR
~ ~ ~ti~ ~ , '~aG ~Sl~ 1
~ ~ ~r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I- ~i ~ ~-a-=a i ~ ~ ~ ,
~1 ~ ~ C~ ' ~ ~r I ,7 `~r 1 ~ f ~ ~ ~
, i I a~ {--Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
L-~ J ~ ~ G.~ r ` ! ~ ' ~ ~~I , ~ ~ { ~ ~
~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~r : ~ ~,f ~ ~ 1C
~ . ~ ~ r~ ~ ~(M cr, E~.,7
: ,1 ~_1'~ 1 r ~ ~ l'J] =ir- ~ i`~~ ~
• ~ f', ~ ~ ~ f{: _n ~ ~ ~ l ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
y L/y~ ~ \ L~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~
~l ~ _ ~ s~~, ~ , ~ ~ ; ~ .
~ ~ ` ~ ' •e._ I f; / ~
~ ~ ~f 4~ ~~~Y~~~~~ ~ r.,,
• ~ ~ ~y ~
~ ~ 1 ~lL ~ ~ l~~ SM _
~ ~ f~~ r 1l I~
I i a r ~ f / ~
tk f~ ! ~f ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~,•rf ~ ~ I ~ ,
~ ~ ~ a ~
~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~I ~ ~
~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~rn ~
f ~ I ' I ~f~~ ~~--~~fy ~ ~ .r~ ~ ~ r/ .
i
~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ U~ + BALF~UR RD. ~ ~ ~ _
_ . ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
. ~ ~
' ~ C~ RAYI~~~lD F~D. ~ A~ l , ~ ~
f~J ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'f
. ~ ~ ' ~ s~~ \ . ~ _ • ;
. • Ci' ~f 1 ~ r. ~ i _ . ~t ~
~ ~ ' ~ - f
~ ~
~ r.,•-., . l.J N ~ ll~~ ~ ~Y ~ ~ f•~, ~
~ ~i1'~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ t 4 ~ v~ ~ ~ , ~
R~ f - , . i f ~ ~ . . f
~ ' l f'll f ~
! , ff { ~f ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ . r~ ,:r r/~ ~ `f ~ r . I s V '
~ ; ~ ~ ~~l f
C~ ~ ~ ' a~,
_ ~
r ~ , ~y ~ i ,
~ ~l ~ ~ f' ~ r~ ~
~ ~ ~ + ~ t
~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ `_r ~ ` ~ i _
~l., ~ ~ ~ rI +iV' ~ / ~ ~l/' ~ ~~ti
. "f ! . ~ ,I - j' f.1~1 ^ `
. f1 tl ~ ~I~' i. ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~'1 ~ I~,, ~ `~t~ -~r ~C tJ1 ~
~ 1 . ~ ~ ~~I ~ 1 ~''1 -~i-' i_} ~ ` ~
I.CP ~ ~ 1 ( r~~ , `
r' I ~A; ~l 11~,' ~ , + I1
f ~S~ • ~ 1"~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ~ ~ - r~ , _ - . ~ ~ - - ,
~ ~ ri ~ . • t ~ - - c i~5 ~
- I~I r, ~„1~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~s~
~ 1 ' ~ f. ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ + , dJ4 ~ ~ f ,5 I.,:~ 1
' ~ ' t'•' I ~ , ; ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~s
, ~ ~ ; ~ ~ . ~ ~
,
=',LfT: _
rl'~~~tl~~~~ I;n~i~~c~ri1~~, I~~~. -
~l L'iti~i] wR;;n rutci Lanaf I'lanning ~ ►V'dl~l: - _
Mi7, 10(i AlisSion Ave., SEFoI~~~~I c. , tiM'ashi►1bici~1 99'?0 1
Fl l ~►~M~)} E{~t~X (:~o9) :;~}r~_1.~22.~ '
2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WJTH FULL BUIL-OUT ANa
- IIALLEY COUPLET COMPLETION IJNIVERSITY CITY ; v~~ _ t~ ~ ~ R ~ (4-15 To 5: 15 PEAK HOUR)
. i
C. Phase III and Build Out Trip Distribution
, Trip Distribution for phase III and build out of the project was completed by establishing a
cordline around the project and determining the northbound, southbound, eastbound, and
westbound entrances and exits to and from the project. A cordline is a boundary drawn at
a certain coordinate from which entering and exiting volumes can be measured. The
cordlines for University City were just beyond the projects critical intersections. By
determining the entering and exiting volumes, and summing up the volumes in particular
directions, a percentage distribution can be established. The dispersal of generated traffic is
completed by the established directional distribution.
For this Project, the directional distribution of vehicles before from the existing 2010
scenarios was 9% to and from the north, 29% to and from the west, 30% to and from the
south, and 32% to and from the east. Additional trips were dispersed in this fashion. The
high numbers of turning vehicles at the intersections were a direct result of the University
City distribution. Trips entering from one direction to visit the shopping center would have
to circumvent the mall to return to their origin. There are some westbound Sprague
Avenue users who may wish to return east by Broadway Road to the north versus
circumventing the shopping center again. This small percentage is reflected in the
distribution. All intersection volumes can be seen in figure 11.
D. Phase III and Build Out Intersection Analysis
LOS determinations for the 2010 scenarios do not follow any established cycle times or
patterns other that a complete cycle length of 80 seconds. They are produced by trial and
error to aclueve an appropnate theoretical LOS for an intersection. Th✓ -a._traffic ~n s 151 (_1F
i m p a c t_ a s s e s s m e n t i s t o s h o w t h a t e ff e c t s o n a p r o je c t c n t i c a l i n t e r s e c t i o n i s m i nim a l.
'Sp o k a n e C o u n t y 1 r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e e r s-w i l l= m o s t l i k e l y b e a b l e t o p r o d u c e s i g n a 1 c y c l e
results that are more efficient than the suitable signals analysis results below.
The overall intersection LOS for year 2010, phase I Sprague Avenue and Farr Road was a
, B for the non-build scenario. The LOS for the 2010 build out scenarios was also a B. The
LOS did not change..
The 2010 Sprague/University intersection analysis progressed differently than the other
intersection analysis. Because northbound rights off of University Road experience high
volumes, the Spokane County Engineers designed the north bound lane with one exclusive
and one shared right lane. Drivers will mostly utilize the exclusive lane until volumes
become high enough to make them use the shared lane. This is accounted for in the
Highway Capncity Manzral by a computer percentage entry for the proportion of users in
the shared lane. As volumes increase, this proportion must also increase to keep LOS D.
The LOS for the 2010 scenario with a 50/50 lane share is a C. This means that more users
could use the exclusive right lane'if they wished. To maintain a LOS D for the 2010 build
out scenario, a 60/40 lane share was used to accommodate right turning vehicles . This
23
means that excess volumes in the exclusive right lane forced trips into the shared right lane. This is normal for high volume arterials.
~
The overall intersection LOS for year 2010 non-build Second avenue and University Road
is a B. The LOS for the intersection dropped to a C with the 2010 build out scenario. The
overall intersection LOS for year 2010 non-build Second Avenue and Farr Road is a B.
The LOS dropped to a C with the 2010 build out scenario. Ali of these LOS are within
acceptable Spokane County 'standards. All intersection Highway Capacity analysis can be ,
viewed in appendix Z. A summary 2010 LOS is shown below:
Table 7: LOS Intersection Scenario Resutts
Scenario Intersection Intersection LUS
Existing Counts (2010) Sprague & Farr B
Existing Counts (2410) Spragtte & University C
Existing Counts (2010) Second & University B
Existing Counts (2010) Second & Fan B
Maximum Build Out (2010) Sprague & Farr B
Maximum Build Out (2010) Sprague & University . D
Maacimum Build Out (2010) Second & University C
Maximum Build Out (2010) Second & Farr C
E. Phase III and Buitd Out Access Analysis
In accordance with Spokane County requests, an access analysis was made for the
driveways on Second Avenue. To accomplish this, the uncontrolled intersection program
from the Highway Capacity Mafnral Software: Release 2e was used. By setting up access
A9 through A16 as a two way stop controlled intersection with stop signs on the minor
legs, analysis for the driveways were made. Also, since the software was not set up to run
the analysis for driveways, another adjustment had to be made. Normally, left turns from a ' major to a minor street encounters conflicting traffic. Because of this, there are numerical
factors that account for the conflict within the software. For the University City access
analysis, there was no such conflict. The program would use the left turn factors in error
and determine unreasonabie LOS. Because of this difficulty, Spokane County Engineers
gave permission for all left turns from Second Avenue to be counted as right turns in the
program. The movement from a one way street is essentially the same. This is the best
' . method for avoiding left turn conflict factors.
The Level of Service Criteria for a two way stopped controlled intersection is similar to sfg n4zc,d
intersections. Criteria is based upon the delay that a vehicle experiences while waiting at a
stop sign. LOS are assigned to delay and the criteria are shown on the next page:
24
'
Tabte 8: Access LOS Descriptions
LUS Deiay (sec/veh) Interpretation
A < 5 Little or no vehicle delay.
B >5 and < 10 Good vehicle progression with light congestion. .
C > 10 and 20 Fair progression with occasional backups and some congestion.
D >20 and < 30 Unfavorable progression with noticeable congestion.
E >30 and 45 Poor progression reaching the limit of acceptable delay.
F >45 Failure in the system with limited progression and high
congestion.
. Source: Higtiway Capacity ManuAl (Transportatyon Researdh Board, 1994)
Qor The Spokane County criteria for road access is better. Because second Avenue has
a great deal of capacity, and the exiting volumes from University City are minor, no access
on from University City onto Second Avenue received an LQS tower than an A. This
means that vehicles entering and exiting University City experience little or nor delay. It
also states that there is plenty of capacity on the arterial and the University City access
system. All University City access Highway Capacity analysis can be viewed in appendix 3.
VIII. Conclusions
A. Arterial System
j The redevelo ment of Universit Cit will not effect the h'
p y y orizontal geometnc of the new
Valley Couplet. One premise for expansion is to keep existing accesses on Sprague and
University at the same locations and create grade accesses on Second Avenue that will not
effect the geometry of the arterial. After analyzing the anticipated traffic impacts for the
proposed University City expansion, it was determined that there was no unacceptable
impacts to surrounding arterials. This includes both the present configuration and the
potential future configuration following construction of the Valley Couplet. With these
conditions established, no further traffic analysis is warranted based upon arterial impacts.
~
B. Intersection Analysis
As shown in LOS Intersection Tables above, none of the overall intersection LOS's drop
below acceptable levels. Phase I and II without the completion of the Va11ey Couplet
showed that the existing intersections will not be unacceptably effected with added project
generation or historical increase in traffic volumes. Phase III and build out of the
University City shopping center do not lower the 2010 LOS below unacceptable levels. If
this is true for 20102 then it should be true for any date of completion before 2010. With
these conditions established, no further traffic analysis is wananted based upon unacceptable intersection impacts.
C. Access Anatysis
25
~ . . . .
The University City access analysls on Second Avenue showed that there was plenty of
capacity on Second Avenue and within the University City access network. These vehicles
also experienced little or not delay. With these conditions established, no further traffic
analysis is warranted based upon University City access location impacts. Recommendations:
This analysis has shown that there will be no unacceptable impacts with the completion of
phase I, II, or III of University City. Also, because the impact created by the renovation of
University City will be minimal, there are no foreseeable safety concerns with the project.
Based upon these findings it is recommended that the building permit application process
be allowed to proceed forward without further traffic impact analysis.
' .
~
26
endix I
A~p
~
,
2~
■ _
~~~r ~ ~r r~ r~ rr r ir i■r ~ r r r i■~r ~
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC.
4:15-6:16 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECflONS
UNIVERSITY CITY REDE1fELOPMENT
SLOPE INTERCEPT R SQUARE
NORTH 20.8 •38241 0,13
SOUTH -0.2 5881.5 0
EIIST 746.1 •1457428 0.99 WEST 177.8 -1514929 0.98
TOTAL 7722 •1504858 0.98 ,
PROJECTED P.M. PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AND FARR
MOVEMENT 1996 ~ 1997 1 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 j 2002 t 2003 2004 j 2005 j 2006 ~ 2007 ~ 2008 ~ 2009 ~ 2010 ET 92.4196 1376 1408 1441 1473 1505 1537 1570 1602 1634 1667 1699 1131 1164 1796 1828
ER 6.5996 98 100 103 105 101 109 112 114 116 119 121 123 126 128 130
EL 1.01 % 15 15 16 16 16 11 17 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20
P.M.PEAK TOT. 1489 1524 1559 1594 1629 1664 1699 1734 1769 1804 1838 1873 1908 1943 1978
AWD TOT. 31187.6 32533.7 33279.8 34025.9 34772 35518.1 36264.2 37010.3 37756.4 3E502.5 39248.6 39994.7 40140.8 41486.9 42233
PERCENT P,MJAWD 4.68% 4,6896 4,6896 4.68% 4.6896 4.68% 4.6896 4,6896 4.6896 4.68% 4.6896 4.68% 4.6896 4.6896 4.6896
I I I 1 I f I I • I I I f I MOVEMENT MOU. ~ 1996 ~ 1991 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 ~ 2002 ~ 2003 ~ 2004 ~ 2005 ~ 2006 ~ 1007 ~ 2008 ~ 1009 ~ 2010 ~
WT 92.5996 1024 1049 1073 1098 1122 1147 1171 1196 1221 1245 1270 1294 1319 1344 1368
WR 1.72% 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 25
N WL 5.70% 63 65 66 68 69 71 72 74 75 _ JT 78 80 81 83 84
00 P.M.PEAK TOT. 1106 1133 1159 1186 1212 1239 1265 1292 1318 1345 _ 1372 1398 1425 1451 1418
AWD TOT. 32560 33338 34115 34893 35671 36449 37227 38004 ~ 38782 39560 40338 41116 41893 42671 43449
PERCENT P.MJAWD 3.40% 3.40% 3.4096 3,40% 3.4096 3.4096 3.40% 3.40% 3.4096 3.4096 3.40% 3.4096 3.40% 3.4096 3.40%
MOVEMENT ~ 1996 1997 ~ 1988_ ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 ~ 2002 ~ 2003 ~ 2004 2005 C 2006 ~ 2007 2008 2009 ~ 2010 NT 34 ~ 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41
NR 55 56 57 58 59 , 60 60 61 62 63 64 64 65 66 67
NL 14 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 64 86 87 88 89 90
~ . . MOVEM ENT ~ 1396 ~ 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 ~ 2001 2402 ~ 2003 + 2004 + 2006 2006 ~ 2007 ~ 2006 ~ 2009 ~ 2010 ~
ST N 45 46 47 47 48 49 49 50 61 51 ~ 62 53 53 54 56
SR N 7 7 7 7 7 8 8. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9
gL M 37 38 38 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 46
/ r I~'L ~ uh I V'{~,y S E
TAYLOti ENGINEERING, INC.
4:154:16 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTlONS \
UNIVERSITY CITY REDEVELOPMENT
SLOPE INTERCEPT R SQUARE
NORTH 249.1 -408471 0,71
SOUTH 359.6 •704905 041 .
EAST 514 •997630 0.78
WEST 483.3 •936988 0.66
TOTAL 783.8 •1524000 0.58
PROJECTED P.M. PEAI( AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GROWTH PROJECTIONS FOR SPRAGUE AND UNIVERSITY
MOVEMENT 1996 ~ 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 t 2000 1 2001 2002 ` 2003 ~ 2004 ~ 2005 1 2006 ~ 2007 2008 2009 2010 ET 84.1796 1114 1195 1217 1238 1260 1281 L 1303 1324 1346 1367 1388 1410 1431 1453 1474
ER 9.4696 131 133 136 138 141 143 145 148 150 153 155 157 160 162 165
EL 5.1896 80 82 83 84 86 81 89 90 92 93 95 . 96 98 99 101
P.M.PEAK TOT. 1385 1410 1436 1461 1486 1511 1537 1562 1587 1613 1638 1663 1689 1714 1739
AWD TOT. 28314 28828 29342 29856 30370 30884 31398 31912 32426 32940 33454 33968 34482 34996 35510 ,
PERCENT P,M.lAWD 4.8996 419% 4.89% 4.8996 4.8996 4.89°6 4.89% 4.89°b 4.9096 4.90% 4.9096 4.9096 4.90% 4.90% ~ 4.9096
MOVEMENT ~ 96 M1M1OV. ~ 1996 ~ 1997 ~ 1998 ~ 1999 2000 ~ 2001 L 2002 L 20Q3 ~ 2004 1005 ~ 2006 ~ 2007 20D8 ~ 2009 ~ 2010 ~
WT 78.7296 836 851 865 880 895 909 924 939 953 968 983 998 1012 1021 1042
WR 5.5646 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 73 74
WL 15.73% 167 170 173 176 179 182 185 188 191 193 196 194 202 205 208
~ P.M.PEAK TOT, _ 1062 . 1081 1499 1118 1137 _ 1155 1174 C 1193 1211 1230 1249 1267 1286 1305 1323
AWD TOT. 21679 28162 . 28645 29129 29512 30095 30579 31062 31545 32029 32512 32995 33478 33962 34445
PERCENT P.M,IAWD f 3.8496 3.8496 3.8496 3.84% 3.8496 3.8496 3.8496 3,8496 ~ 3.84% 3.8496 3.8496 3.8496 3.8496 3.84% 3.84%
MOVEMENT 1996 ~ 1997 ~ 1998 1938 2000 2001 ~ 2002 20Q3 ~ 2004 2005 ~ 2006 ~ 2007 ~ 2008 ~ 2009 ~ 2010
NT 36.4996 131 134 136 139 142 145 147 150 153 156 158 161 164 166 169
NR 23.6896 BS 81 89 90 92 94 96 97 99 101 103 104 106 108 110
NL 39.8396 143 c 148 149 152 155 158 161 164 167 170 173 176 179 162 185
P.M.PEAK TOT. 359 366 374 381 389 c 396 404 411 419 426 434 441 449 456 464
AWD TOT. 10084 10294 10504 10113 10923 11133 11342 11552 11762 11972 12181 12391 12601 12810 13020
PERCENT P,M.IAWD f 3.5696 3.5696 3.56% 3.56% 35696 ~ 3.5696 3,5696 3.5696 3.56% 3.5696 3.5696 3.5696 3.5696 3.56% 3.56%
MOVEMENT 1996 1997 ~ 1996 ~ 1999 ~ 2000 , 2001 L 2002 j 2003 ~ 2004 ~ 2006 ~ 2006 ~ 2007 ~ 2008 ^ 2009 2010 ~
ST 46.1896 196 201 207 212 218 223 229 234 240 245 251 256 261 261 273
SR 16.4796 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 84 86 88 90 92 94 _ 96
SL 36.7596 154 158 163 167 171 176 180 184 188 193 197 201 206 210 214
P.M.PEAK TOT. 419 431 442 454 466 478 489 501 513 524 536 548 560 571 583
AWD TOT. 12857 13216 13576 13935 14295 14655 15014 15374 15733 16093 16453 16812 11172 17531 11891
PERCENT P.M.lAWD ~ 3.26% 3.26% 3.2696 3.26% 3.28% 3.26% 3.2696 3,2696 ~ 3.2896 31696 `3,26% 3.2696 3.2696 32696 3.2696
~
TAYLOR ENCtNEERING, INC. !]WIVERSi7Y CITY REDEVELOPNIENT
TFL4FF1G GOUNTB SUiVIMARY AND. 8f~d198~
PEAK HOllR DETER3VIiNATIQN
lfNtVERSi"PY CITY TRAFFIC ICOUNTS AT FIFTEEN MINUTE iNTERVALS
ACCESS 1 ACCESS 2 ACCES63 ACCESS 4 ACCESS 5
TiME rotal ~ in ~ vLrt -Tocai ~In 9 oLt rcitat ~ In ~ out "rotai ~ in vut Total 1 in ~OLt
3-30 PM 29 ( 13 16 15 ( 5~10 2~ 1~ 1 10 5 5 2` 1~ 1
3.45 ~M 34 13 21 22 ~ 9 13 1 ~ o ~ 1 15 8 1 7 3 ~ 1 j 2
4:00 PM 23 5 ~ is 20 ~ 7 13 4 ~ o y 4 13 ~ s 1 a s ( 2 ~ 4 -
4:15 PM ~ 16 23 26 ~ 12 14 5 1 ~ ~ ~ 14 r ~ ~ 7 !p 3 ~ s
4.30 PM 27 14 1 13 ~23 I s 15 a ~ o ( 2 9 s { 4 11 4 7
4:45 P nn ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 29 14 15 2 2 r o 5 1 ~ 4 11 ~ s ~ s .
5.00 PM ~ ~ ~ 19 ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 20 14 ~ s 12 ~ 4 ~ s -
5:15 PM 15 7 ~ a 8 3 5 7 y 0 7 14 ~ s ~ s _ s ~ t ~ 5 _
PM 16 4 12 14 4 10 - 3 1 ~ 2 10 { s ~ 4 s 2 ~ a
5:45 PM 22 ~ s ~ 13 18 ~ 10 8 4 ~ v ~ ~ 12- 4 s 8 6 2
~ s:o~ PM ' 19 ~ IC) 15 1 2 ~ 13 2~ o~ 2 14 7 7 a o
6:15.PM 14 ~ 4 ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 r 12 9 1 3 5 . r 3 2
L 14CGESS6 ACGESS 7 ACCESS 8 , l~CCESS 9 ACCES51Q TINfE Total) In ~ Out 3o#al ~ in ~ Q~ - Tatay ~ 1n ~ Dut Tatal ~ In ~ Out To#al ~ In Ouk
330 PM 3a~ 14 16 io~ s ~ 5 7 2' 5 12 j IC) 2 18 ~ 7 11
'
3:45 PM 28 ~18 ~10 2 .5 3 2 11~ s~s 21 12 ~ s
4.00 PM 24 ~ 13 ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ 24 ~ s ~ 16
4:15 4n 22113~9 7 2 s 4~3 1 9 8I1 26 10116
4:30 PM 32 18 ` 14 9 3 6, 3 1 2 s ~ s M z 24 8 f 16
4;~PM 13 7 5 11 ~:5 6 3) 2~ s 9~ s3 24`9~15'
5.c~PM 15 ~ 13~ 2 10 ~ 3 7 3 y 1 2 13 11 2 36 I iQf 26
5:15 3'M 19 I 13 ~ 6 6+ 3~ 3 3+ 1~ 2 7 L 5 I 2 25 ~ i4 ~ 11 ,
5:-30 ~M 23 ~ 15 8 ~ s ~ 2 ~ a a d .0 ~ a 12 12 d a 10 ~ s z
5:45 PM 20 1 11 9 ia ~ 5 5 8 6 ~ z 15 13 ~ 2 29 E s 29
6:0a PM 23 10 13 8 4 ~ a s ~ 2 ~ s 14 10 j 4 34 10 ~ 24
6:15 PM i 19 12 , 7 5 3 2 9 1 8 11 1 9 2 13 4 I 9-M
4
ACCE55 17 UrC1T1f' TOTALS Peak Fiour Assesment:
~ 'fIME To#ai ~ In ` {}ut Total I 1n I Out 'kiourly Totals 320 PM 5 31 2 1401 66 74 ~ Peak Haur Period ~ Tokal In Ouk ~ -
3:45 P14'I 3 1 2 1501 76 74 3:3+0-430 Pflll 6041 278 1 326
*00 PM s ~ 2 1 a 1461 59 I 87 3A5-4:45 ~M 6231 201 1 342
4:15 PM 7 ~ a 1 s 16~ 1 -77 1 91 - 4:01Z~S:00 PM 6161 2e6 1 350
4~Q PM 11 1 2 1 9 1591 ~ 1 90 4:15r5:1 5 PM 6i8 1 267 351 RESULTING PEAFC 1i0UR
4:45 Phll 14 I 5~9 1431 61 1 82 4:30-5.30 PM 5821 263 319
s:oo FM 7 5 ~ 2 . 168 1 aa 1 sB 4:45-51-45 PM 1 2501 281
5; ~ ~ PM ~ 2 0 2 112 s~ se 5:oo-~:oa PM 541 2~ 276
5:30 PM a ~ 2 ~ z I os ~ 52 s: 1 15 PM 516 244 a~
5:~ PM 7 1 4 1 a ~531 76 1 77 S.W-6:30 PM Se 2451 264
, s-ao PM s~ s ~ 1 1431 59 1 94
fi;16 PM 2 ~ 1 1 1051 54 1 $1 ,
rot, ~ 16961 7$8 1 909 .
l 30 1
pendix TI
A,p
~
1
3A
~
' . . . : . ' - - ' • . ' • . • .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SIJNIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
~ Center_For_Microcomputers-In_Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E98SP&FA.HC9
~ Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 1998 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0> 1 < 0 0> 1 < 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
, Volumes 77 35 57 38 47 7 16 1441 103 66 1073 20
PHF or PK15 0..92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
~ Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
' ---------------------------Signal Operations---------------------------
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
~ Thru * Thru *
Right * Right * .
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
i WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
' Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
, Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB LTR 330 1318 0.558 0.250 18.5 C 18.5 C
' SB LTR 333 1332 0.300 0.250 15.9 C 15.9 C
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 7.4 B
TR 3181 5532 0.580 0.575 7.2 B
WB L 111 1770 0.651 0.063 32.2 D 7.5 B
TR 3204 5573 0.408 0.575 6.1 B
Intersection Delay = 8.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.579
~
32
~ '
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIIKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
~ Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FA.RR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E98SP&FA.HC9
' Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 1998 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITHOUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
~ Volumes 77 35 67 45 47 7 16 1684 103 74 1204 22
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 _ 12.0 12.0' 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0. 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 00
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 33 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00-3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot. .
Signal Operations---------------------------
~
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
' Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB LTR 326 1305 0.598 0.250 19.2 C 19.2 C
SB LTR 317 1268 0.341 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.1 . B
TR 3185 5540 0.671 0.575 8.0 B WB L 111 1770 0.723 0.063 37.3 D 8.0 B
TR 3205 5573 0.457 0.575 6.4 B
Intersection Delay = 8.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.654
33
' . HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
_Center_For_Microcomputers_In_Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E98SP&FA.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2000 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 79 36 59 40 48 7 16 1505 107 69 1122 21
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 -3
, RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * . Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * -WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 _ Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
t Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary .
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB LTR 327 1310 0.577 0.250 18.8 C 18.8 C
SB LTR 329 1316 0.313 0.250 16.0 C 16.0 C
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 7.5 B
TR 3181 5533 0.606 0.575 7.4 B
WB L 111 1770 0.678 0.063 33.8 D 7.7 B
TR 3204 5573 0.427 0.575 6.2 B
Intersection Delay = 8.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.603
34
~ w • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlMARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BZLL WHITE File Name: MOOSP&FA.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2000 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITH PHASE I AND WITHOUT COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No.'Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 79 36 73 50 48 7 16 1864 107 83 1350 25
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
~ Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
~ Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB LTR 323 1292 0.631 0.250 20.0 C 20.0 C
SB LTR 306 1223 0.373 0.250 16.4 C 16.4 C
EB L 111 1770 0.154 0.063 23.0 C 8.9 B
TR 3187 5543 0.739 0.575 8.8 B
WB L 111 1770 0.814 0.063 47.3 E 8.8 B
TR 3205 5573 0.513 0.575 6.7 B
Intersection Delay = 9.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.714
35
.
l. .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SjJNIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: EOOSP&FA.HC9
~ Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2002 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 81 37 60 41 49 8 17 1570 112 72 1171 22
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 4 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Riqht * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #5 #6
Intersection Performance Summary ~
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB LTR 325 1298 0.595 0.250 19.2 C 19.2 C
SB LTR 325 1302 0.329 0.250 16.1 C 16.1 C
EB L 111 1770 0.163 0.063 23.0 C 7.8 B
TR 3181 5532 0.632 0.575 7.6 B
WB L 111 1770 0.705 0.063 35.8 D 7.9 B
TR 3204 5573 0.445 0.575 6.3 B
Intersection Delay = 8.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.627
36
' •
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIIKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: M02SP&FA.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2002 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITH PHASE II AND WITHOUT COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 81 37 74 51 49 8 17 1935 112 87 1407 26
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
, WB Right SB Right
Green 19.OA Green 4.OA 45.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
_
~ CycleLength___80 _secs__Phase _combinat_on _order__#1 _#5 _#6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
, Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
-
NB LTR 321 1283 0.648 0.250 20.5 C 20.5 C
SB LTR 303 1212 0.386 0.250 16.5 C 16.5 C
~ EB L 111 1770 0.163 0.063 23.0 C 9.3 B
TR 3187 5542 0.768 0.575 9.2 B
WB L 111 1770 0.859 09063 5495 E 9.4 B
TR 3205 5573 0.535 0.575 6.9 B
Intersection Delay = 10.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.741
37
. . . . .
. .
.
HCMi SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E98SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 1998 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 0 1 2< 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
Volumes 149 136 89 163 207 73 83 1217 136 173 865 61
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
~ Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.742 0.123 30.6 D 22.7 C
TR 735 3504 0.349 0.210 17.7 C
SB L 218 1770 0.810 0.123 35.8 D 24.5 C
TR 751 3580 0.425 0.210 18.2 C
EB L 109 1770 0.824 09062 49.3 E 18.0 C
TR 2038 5504 0.794 0.370 16.3 C
WB L 262 1770 0.717 0.148 27.4 D 12.3 B
TR 2528 5533 0.438 0.457 9.7 B
Intersection Delay = 17.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.692
38
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SjJMriARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: M98SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 1998 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITHOUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 0 1 2< 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
Volumes 172 143 93 163 241 90 93 1432 183 202 960 61
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0
Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
~
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.856 0.123 40.8 E 27.3 D
TR 736 3505 0.366 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 218 1770 0.810 0.123 35.8 D 24.2 C
TR 750 3573 0.504 0.210 18.7 C
EB L 109 1770 0.925 0.062 68.8 F 26.0 D
TR 2035 5493 0.950 0.370 23.7 C
WB L 262 1770 0.839 0.148 35.9 D 14.0 B
TR 2530 5538 0.482 0.457 10.0 B
Intersection Delay = 22.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.807
39
.
HCM: SZGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E98SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2000 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 0 1 2< 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
Volumes 155 142 92 171 218 77 86 1260 141 179 895 63
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.OP
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0
~ Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.769 0.123 32.5 D 23.5 C
, TR 736 3505 0.363 0.210 17.8 C
SB L 218 1770 0.851 0.123 40.3 E 26.1 D
TR 751 3579 0.449 0.210 18.3 C
EB L 109 1770 09851 0.062 53.7 E 18.9 C
TR 2039 5504 0.822 0.370 16.9 C
WB L 262 1770 0.744 0.148 28.7 D 12.6 B
TR 2528 5533 0.453 0.457 9.8 B
Intersection Delay = 18.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.721
40
.
~ ` . . .
z
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: MOOSP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2000 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITH PHASE I AND WITHOUT COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 3 < 0 1 3 < 0
Volumes 193 159 104 171 284 98 106 1546 208 235 1006 63
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
~ Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right ~
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.nP
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.
, Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C 'Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.961 0.123 59.5 E 35.1 D
TR 736 3505 0.408 0.210 18.1 C
SB L 218 1770 0.851 0.123 40.3 E 25.7 D
TR 752 3582 0.581 0.210 19.5 C
EB L 109 1770 1.053 0.062 110.6 F 43.5 E
TR 2033 5489 1.032 0.370 39.8 D
WB L 262 1770 0.973 0.148 57.8 E 18.1 C
TR 2530 5539 0.505 0.457 10.2 B
Intersection Delay = 32.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.900
41
• ' " . . .
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: EOOSP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2002 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT OR COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 0 1 2< 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
Volumes 161 147 96 180 229 81 90 1303 148 185 924 65
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right n
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green B.OA 3.OA 29. Ipr
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4. ~
, Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.801 0.123 35.0 D 24.5 C
TR 736 3505 0.377 0.210 17.9 C
SB L 218 1770 0.897 0.123 46.7 E 28.6 D
TR 751 3580 0.471 0.210 18.5 C
EB L 109 1770 09897 0.062 62.5 F 2092 C
TR 2038 5503 0.851 0.370 17.8 C
WB L 262 1770 0.767 0.148 30.0 D 12.8 B
TR 2527 5533 0.468 0.457 9.9 B
Intersection Delay = 19.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.750
42
. •
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: M02SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2002 MAXIMUM U-CITY WITH PHASE II AND WITHOUT COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 0 1 2< 0 1 3< 0 1 3< 0
Volumes 200 164 108 180 295 104 109 1602 216 241 1043 65
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Riqht SB Right '
Green 9.OA 16.OA Green 8.OA 3.OA 29.0
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 0.0 4.0 4.0
1 Cycle Length: 81 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 218 1770 0.993 0.123 67.8 F 38.6 D
TR 735 3504 0.422 0.210 18.2 C
, SB L 218 1770 0.897 0.123 46.7 E 27.9 D
TR 751 3580 0.607 0.210 19.7 C
EB L 109 1770 1.080 09062 122.7 F 56.6 E
TR 2033 5489 1.069 0.370 53.0 E
WB L 262 1770 0.999 0.148 64.8 F 19.3 C
TR 2530 5539 0.524 0.457 10.3 B
Intersection Delay = 39.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.932
43
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMKARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E10SE&FA.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT AND WITH COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L' T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 4 < 0 0 0 0
Volumes 147 83 109 147 76 1969 147
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W( f t) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * * WB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 26.OA 12.0 Green 34.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 0.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
~ Cycle Length: 80 secsP_ase combinat-on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB TR 535 1586 0.467 0.338 14.0 B 14.0 B
SB L 460 1770 0.257 0.488 11.7 B 12.1 B
T 629 1863 0.255 0.338 12.5 B
EB LTR 3221 7363 0.814 0.438 13.9 B 13.9 B
Intersection Delay = 13.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.606
44
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
' Center_For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: M10SE&FA.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY WITH BUILDOUT AND WITH COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 4 < 0 0 0 0
Volumes 147 289 286 170 76 2389 147
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left EB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left * * WB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 26.OA 12.OP Green 34.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 0.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #2 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB TR 510 1510 0.930 0.338 33.7 D 33.7 D
' SB L 359 1770 0.866 0.488 32.8 D 25.3 D
T 629 1863 0.294 0.338 12.7 B
EB LTR 3228 7377 0.968 0.438 21.4 C 21.4 C
Intersection Delay = 23.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.955
45
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E10SE&UN.HC9
, Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT AND WITH COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0
Volumes 482 487 1360 666
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W( f t) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left EB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left WB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 22.OA Green 50.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
' Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB T 1071 3725 0.514 0.287 15.7 C 15.7 C
SB T 1071 3725 0.518 0.287 15.8 C 15.8 C
EB L 2256 3539 0.675 0.637 6.5 B 5.9 B
R 2019 3167 0.405 0.637 4.7 A
Intersection Delay = 9.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.626
46
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUNIlKARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY ROAD (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E10SE&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY WITH BUILDOUT AND COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No . Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0
Volumes 672 551 2002 884
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W( ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left EB Left *
Thru * Thru
Right Right *
Peds Peds
SB Left WB Left
Thru * Thru
Right Right
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 22.OA Green 50.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 . Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat-on order: #1 #5
,
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB T 1071 3725 0.715 0.287 18.1 C 18.1 C
SB T 1071 3725 0.587 0.287 16.4 C 16.4 C
' EB L 2256 3539 0.993 0.637 22.5 C 16.9 C
R 2019 3167 0.538 0.637 5.4 B
Intersection Delay = 17.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.907
47
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SLMKARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (N-S) UNIVERSITY (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: E10SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY WITHOUT BUILDOUT AND WITH COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 1 1 2< 0 0 0 0 0> 4 < 0
Volumes 281 283 1216 207 263 102 224 1223 79
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
$ Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share 50
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
Green 33.OA 12.OP Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #2 #5
'
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
,
NB L 752 1770 0.406 0.425 10.5 B 21.0 C
TR 1421 3344 0.716 0.425 13.5 B
R 673 1583 0.982 0.425 37.4 D
SB L 288 1770 0.782 0.162 29.6 D 25.7 D
TR 580 3569 0.719 0.162 23.5 C
WB LTR 2202 7339 0.828 0.300 1898 C 18.8 C
Intersection Delay = 20.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.894
48
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4e 01-14-1998
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets. (N_S) UNIVERSITY (E_W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
Analyst: BILL WHITE File Name: M10SP&UN.HC9
Area Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
' Comment: 2010 U-CITY WITH BUILDOUT AND COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 1 2< 1 1 2< 0 0 0 0 0> 4 < 0
Volumes 595 339 1508 207 297 150 274 1541 79
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Grade 0 0 0
% Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
' Parking N N N N N N
Bus Stops 0 0 0
Con. Peds 0 0 0 0
Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3
RTOR Vols 0 0 0
Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share 60
Prop. Prot.
Signal Operations
~ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NB Left * EB Left
Thru * Thru
Right * Right
Peds Peds
SB Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
EB Right NB Right
WB Right SB Right
' Green 33.OA 12.OP Green 23.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
Cycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat_on order: #1 #2 #5
'
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
NB L 752 1770 0.860 0.425 20.5 C 31.6 D
TR 1411 3319 1.006 0.425 34.6 D
R 673 1583 0.975 0.425 35.8 D
SB L 288 1770 0.782 0.162 29.6 D 31.4 D
TR 575 3538 0.887 0.162 32.1 D
WB LTR 2205 7351 1.027 0.300 39.5 D 39.5 D
Intersection Delay = 34.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.991
49
i. ~
M: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SU'NIIMARY Version 2.4e 01-13-1998
~ Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
reets: (N-S) FARR ROAD (E-W) SPRAGUE AVENUE
alyst: BILL WHITE File Name: ElOSP&FA.HC9
ea Type: Other -32767--32767--32767 PM PEAK
Comment: 2010 U-CITY W/OUT BUILDOUT AND WITH COUPLET
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
. Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 4 < 0
lumes 164 66 111 12 148 1536 30
PHF or PK15 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
ne w(ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
ade 0 0 p
tHeavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parking N N N N N N
s Stops 0 0 p
n. Peds 0 0 0 0
Fed Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N
Arr Type 3 3 3 3
OR Vols 0 0 p
rost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Share
rop. Prot.
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
B Left * EB Left
Thru * Thru •
Right * Right
Peds Peds
B Left * WB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
B Right NB Right
tB Right SB Right
Green 22.OA Green 50.OA
ellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0
tycle Length: 80 secs Phase combinat--on order: #1 #5
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
B L 283 986 0.628 0.287 19.1 C 17.5 C
T 536 1863 0.134 0.287 13.7 B
rsB TR 475 1652 0.282 0.287 14.4 B 14.4 B
WB LTR 4717 7399 0.435 0.637 4.7 A 4.7 A
Intersection Delay = 6.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
iLost Time/Cycle, L= 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.495
50
~
~
'
Appendix III
1
~
1
52
,
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A10.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
'
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A9 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.... 1/13/98
Other Information.........2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 14 2895 17
PHF .95 .95 .95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
53
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A10.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.98
Intersection Performance Swmmary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.6
SB R 20 1385 2.6 0.0 A
EB L 17 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.0
Intersection Delay = 0.0 sec/veh
~
'
54
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A11.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
~ UniversitY of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A10 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.... 1/13/98
Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 68 2820 89
PHF .95 .95 •95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traff ic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
'
55
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A11.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
' Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
' Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.93
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.92
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.8
SB R 103 1385 2.8 0.2 A
EB L 79 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh
'
,
56
,
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A12.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
, UniversitY of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY Ail (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 102 2780 108
PHF .95 .95 .95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf )
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
,
57
,
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A12.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.91
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.93
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0•88
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.9
SB R 125 1385 2.9 0.2 A
EB L 118 1714 2.3 0.1 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh
,
58
~
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A13.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A12 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 79 2798 84
PHF .95 .95 .95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
'
'
59
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A13.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.93
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
-
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.91
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.8
SB R 97 1385 2.8 0.1 A
EB L 91 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh
1
60
'
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A14.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A13 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
, Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 87 2796 81
PHF .95 .95 .95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Maior Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
~
~
61
i
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A14.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
~ Step 1: RT_from_Minor_StreetNBSB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.93
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.94
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.90
' Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.8
SB R 94 1385 2.8 0.1 A
EB L 101 1714 2.2 0.1 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh
~
~
~
62
~
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A14.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A14 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
I Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
~ Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 135 2705 178
PHF .95 .95 .95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
~ AdJ'ustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
~ Maneuver GaP (tg) Time tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
'
63
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A14.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.85
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.91
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.84
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
3.1
SB R 206 1385 3.1 0.6 A
EB L 156 1714 2.3 0.2 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec/veh
~
,
~
64
HCS: Unsignalized Zntersections Release 2.1e 2010A15.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ~
Ph: (904) 392-0378 ~
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A15 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60,(min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
Other Information......... 2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0 > 4 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 41 2803 37
PHF .95 .95 •95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1.10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
65
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A15.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conf licting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.95
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.7
SB R 43 1385 2.7 0.0 A
EB L 47 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.0
Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh
66
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A16.HC0 Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) DRIVEWAY A16 (E-W) SECOND AVENUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst BILL WHITE
Date of Analysis.......... 1/13/98
Other Information..... ....2010 UNIVERSITY CITY WITH BUIDOUT
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes 0> 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 31 2817 27
PHF .95 .95 •95
Grade 0 0
MC's
SU/RV's
CV's
PCE's 1.10 1010
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
67
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e 2010A16.HC0 Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714
Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-Free State: 0.96
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg. 95$
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
2.7
SB R 31 1385 2.7 0.0 A
EB L 36 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.0
- Intersection Delay = 0.0 sec/veh
68
. .
.,i,_
~ . , ~
< <r
~ t ~t~i ~ r ~ F ~ ~ ' • ` ' ~ * ~ ~r,,, ~
• ~ ~ ~ ' • ' ' ♦
y R~ ~ Y • . { ~ ~,F " ~ , ` ~ ` k~ ~ , s 'i~. c
. ~
t Y 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ } ~ . ~ ~ ~-f • ~t 1
~ 1r ` . r . t ~ a +t1k' r .
~ ~ • j rix'' ''i^',~tr~•= ~y'^ ~ ~ ~ f ~ . r'f'~ ~
~ ~ ~ ' r~ ~s ~ ' ' ' . • ' r ~ ' ;
~,r~rt ~~~1~ ~ ~ ~G r r • r r* ' ~t ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ` ~ r ~ , ~Ii
V , • h + ~ ~y~t, , ~ ' • l ~',e~/~' °y ` s R ~ _ ~y , ~ .,,~aT'~ . ' r tf..~ ~ ' ~ ~
iti~ '4 t_'Tn' 1_ , t~( ~ • ie ,d . ' ~K
J~ ' T ~ ~ .y ♦ N. v~ ~r e i~tJ + y„ ~ : ~T ~ t~~~~ y ~ f ' ' y ~ y
' 4' ''t ' f}' , 3 ~ I ; :~tRC fi , FJ ~ e r ~a1-~~• Q;,~
r i s y ~ ~ ~ ~x,' ^ , ~ •1^t `'r ~ ' : F+: ~ • ~ ~ rr
,~~'1 ` ~ : 1 ~ . K • 10
~ 'r{ `FY i s i ~ $ ~ ~ , . ' `.1~ ..k ♦ ' a~ Fl •.iX '
~ . , i ~ ` 'k 4 . t~ L } Yp' ' • ~ y':Z ~ ~j ~'~w
~ ~ C.~,~y,~,~i„~7+' t. r TY Y ~ . y~ ~`f~~ ~f ~ t; ~f" ~ '~'~~d AL
.
t
wri.`'1r` rj; t . L ,x * '~kf ' ~ ' = . ~
^ i # "viFC~ i ' p~ ~ • ~ ~
.tS4
~i~. r . x A~ 1 ~ ~ty,~ f „~t t~l'7-4' ^ Y ! ~ M 3 ~ t ~i '.Y' 4 f ,r~ ~ -t 1 ? }t
i ~y .r~ f,`+.~ {.,,l or ` ,A ~yi~tY„ . ~~r ♦ r i, t ~Py
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • r• y N 1 ~~y,~ ~''ic " s~ • „j " r F ~'1!', ,
~ ~r~• !:1
{ r , y+~,,L~t•~ i ~~n 'L k. e y ~ ~ ~
,„,r • 7 t t T • ~ s ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 73 J + 'CN
• Z ~t • ~ • t . ~ R ~ ~ . M ' c~ a< ` t ^ ,
E' i ~ ~ y _'f ~i.r • f , w• ~ • , Q y ~ ' , • • fi,~~
~ r _ ` ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~:ti M
~ ` ~ ~~~4y 4 '~t~+ ~ t ' '1~ 1 ~ • + i ~ ~ ~
s 1 4' . ♦ Y
J , ~~y~ _ •l~'~ ~ ~ ~A' ~t `„Y t ' ; ft ~
ti+. r .t ~ k r , i ~ ' ~'~'i ` ` ~ + 'x~`t 1t ~ • y} .tt" .
~ . r ~ ' ' ' , ~ . t~4 , * ~~~x ' +c~r ~ i'~ '~"V'M~! A~l~.
or
~
~t~
, .r ~ ~ p0~'~~` A:. ~ ~ ~S ~ . ~ ~ r •r IN-A},1
r~J ~ ~ ` t,t, .tri "7~ ' ~r fi ` i.~ t
„ ~ 'C ~ y ~,S'aM ' t - ~ ♦ ~ ~ ' y4 T~' ~ " ~ T} t 4 { ' ` ~ ~r +~~T 'F ~
.r4 t +-~yj~' ~ ~y
J~y~_+,I M { ~ ~y ~L . ~ ~ K.YI T r ~ ' ~ • ! ~ "~F ` ~ ~'^M1 ' T ~
_ - i ~ r ~~a`~ ,~~R,'F'?* Gj ~ a ~ , y ` • " ' , 4 Y Y ,
~
4 .~,~f~ ~ ~ ♦ wv~;~ ri. ~ ~ . /w~ r j ~ <y , ` ~ : ~ t~r 'R ~ « • o
! 1
J ~ .iw J4 ~ ~1'+"L•~,' ~ .~~~r R ` ~ ~~TY T
"k- A • ~
~ .I'[ • ~ ~ 4~ '4 f ~ , r ~ ~ ,i~T~ ~ A~ ~ _t~ +
' ~ ~ , M ~ ` 1 t 3 A ~
y L S ~ y~~-' ~ ~ ,►~r r R ~ ^ ~ ~1~ l ` ~ 1
'~,t, _ ~ K {„r. . ~ , "~+4~
r , ~ 47 'S,~ ~ •~,a -,k J 9 . ,js. Y •
h ~1
f } ~ 3•~ ~ f 4• !'~i • ~y~[~Ffi; i~ . ~ 'tt . r tt,t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e~ly.~ ' t r S~ ~ ' ~ ~Y• S ^ ~ r~^ i ^~'+Li~. G
"i~
14
4 ~ ~ ~a y~h ~ - ~ • ~ _ ~s
Ys . tit 7 ~ q~ ~ s`~"1+V'~ f.~ ~ ~ "h ~
w y•~ i'
L
~r ~ ♦ ~ • ~ r . •f~`' ~ ~-r f t ~ • ` ~ 4 'i4• ,i ^ ~
' Y ;~Q c5 •f ~ * j' ~ ai.,~ ~s' ~ 1 > 1 > ` ~ y'~yV,
4 t ~ t f~~\ i. ~ ~fr 1
- - ~ y ~ _ jucp r~ S ~ . ~ y t ~ . ♦ F ' y , ~f~ ~ ~ ~R
f ~
~ ~7✓
' ~ _ 1 ~ r ~~~i-Y+ ~ Y .....~r c ~r + ( r . r J ~ t .c
~ '~',k -~ty~ w ~ .?rr r ¢ • ~ ' t~ x s K 'ai
F ~ 'T ` ~k ~ ~ • - , r ~1~~ ~ i ! Y ' ? t ~s ~ , a,'a" ~ ~ "
,o,•
~ ~ ?n.~ ~Yi ~ ~ ~ . Y• f n ~'4 ' - ` R~ 5 ~
fi ~ F ~r4'i~ ' f'~ j'~ r ^j,a . w ~~.'yr l 4 • 1 •
v*u • +Y411 ^ ~ ~ r • ~ i+wi _ ` r:~~~ ` ' S ' ~~t ~~,i.~~ ~
t t . J ~ .s1`
~ ~t ~ , ' ' 1 ~ ' ' ;<j, h ` ~y ^ 4 ` •
Yf + • . ! ~L, c .F ~ ~i
` ' ' r ''~`,f ~ ~ , ~4~ . . s+' ~ ~ ,x ^t;
> t ~ . r~ • ~ , • . _ tie ' i r. ti~ 'M , ~
~ ~ ^ `f~`, ~ •d~° ~ ~ 3 • , ' j~ w, ' O~'~
•S t r „ T~~• , ~ , - s• ~ • 7~ .'3. .•p~ [ ,
~l4
~ ` 4 M`+. ' ~ ~ ^ `'1i T~` ~ ~ '1~ • Y ♦ .s~ . ~ v yi . , ~ ~.XM
y , rA
~1 +
me
Total ~r__ _ - - - -
leg of intersection Cntenng University Rd & Sprague Ave
Year Norlh South East West Interseclion ADT Volumes w! Projected Growth Lfnes
1990 8647 10484 25379 24985 34148 esooo
~t' ~ ~ ~~~Ja' ,
1991 9219 11491 25547 25034 35646
. .
1992 9454 11188 26588 26104 36661 aoooo . . . . i. . ~ . :
,
1993 9200 11805 26111 25373 36245 75000 ' ' • ' • • • ' " ' ' ' ' ' " ' '
1994 9705 12125 276G7 27232 383135
1995 70000 . , . . . ; . . , . ; ~ . . . . ; . .
1996 Gsooo . , . . . . . . . . . . . : . . : . . . . . ~
1997
1998 60000 ; . . . . . : . . . . : . . . . . , , . . , : . ; . .
1999 55000 S. . , . . . , . . % . , t ~ ~ . i . . .t . ~ j . 0 . . 1 •
2000
2001 50000 ' . , . • i • , , . : . . . . ~ : ~ r ~ i t ..t .1.
2002 ~ , ~ ~ ; . . . . . . ' • : . , • . ; ; ~ ~ ~ . , ' , , ; . . . ~ .
2003 , asooo , , • , ; ' _ . ' , . • ; • ; .
2004 = 40000 . : . . , ~ ~ ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .
2005 _ , ~ , . ~ ~ - ~
2006 35000, , . . . ; . . . . _ ; ~
2007 • ~ . . : . . . . . . - ,
30000
-4
0 2008 . . , . . .
. . . . . . . . . ~ ; ,
2009 Jq,o75, % 25000
2010 51,4 3~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ : . .
2011 20000 • : : . . . : . : . : . . ' . . , . , ; , , : ,
2012 15000 . . . , . . . . , . , . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 , • ' ~ ' ~ '
. , , ; . J.....{ . , . . t ~ . ~ .....E.. ~ .i .
2014 10000
2015 5000 ~ y i ~ . . . ~ . i { • r ~ ~ ,'•i • V ` y• j . f . . ~ . . ~ ; .
2016 O fV N T V1 Ll f~ ~ ^ ~ t !1 IP1 4 f~ M C' C7 - N ✓1 " J~
e+ c+ e ~1 - n n = ~ ~ u o o c o 4'u v n c o c~ ~
Slope Intercept R Square C'. C, = " _ " -
^ - ~ ~ . r. cv rv c~ r ~ n~ N ~ r~ r
North 2097 408477 0 71 , Ycar
South 3596 -704905 0 82 +North Leg -ei-south Leg -drEast leg
85t 5140 -997630 0 78 -)E-West Leg -31E--Total Intersection Volume lutear (East leg)
WeSt 4833 -936988 0 66 lmear (West Leg) linear (Soulh Leg) Linear (North Leg)
Total 783 8•1524000 0 85 -
rr rr w~r r ~
rotal
leg of inlersection Entenng Farr Rd & Sprague Ave
Year North South Easl West lntersection ADT Volumes wl Projected Growth Unes
1990 85000
1991 2727 5165 28144 28724 32380
• ; , -
,~,„r •
1992 2892 5868 28660 29283 33352 eoooo
1993 2762 5668 29575 30398 34202
' .t.
1994 2839 5231 30326 34945 34671 75000 . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . ; . . .
1995 70000 . . . . . . . . . . _ . . ~ ' ' '
1996 •t ; , " ; . . . , . .
w
1997 ooo • . : . . . _ . . . _ . . ~ . . .
1998 eoaoo • . . . . . . . : . ~ ~
1999 , , . . . . ; . . .
2000 55000 . , . . , . . . . , . . ~ . . . . ~ . . .
2001 50000
2002 . . . . : . . . . . ..r . . , . , . . . , ; . , . . . . „r
2003 ~ asoao . . : . . . , , . . ; ...r-. f ~ ~ r , t r
o
2004
40000 y ~ , . . . , ' .t. t .
2005 a . . , , . ; . ~ T ~ . .
• , ; ' . .
2~~G ~ 35000 i i ' l.r• s i r t r i• ~ ~
2007
2008 ~ 30000 , ~ . . ; : , . . . . : . . . : . : : . . ; .
2009 25000
• • • . y... . • 1 • ~ ♦ . I . . .
2010
472G4 20000
y 2011 • , , .i . ; ; ; : , .
2 012 15000 . . . . ' . . , ~ , ~ ~ • ~ ' . , . ,
2013 ~ , , . ' , . . . , .
?014 10000 . • ' . : ' . ~ . . . . : . . ; . ; , . . . ~ . . _ ' . .
2015 5000 --pr~--~-m
2016 51 ~R7 cs
0
^ N •r N Ia r. [r7 c}
n
rn 0-
Slope Intercept R Square c: c. o o c~ ~ cc.: S a ~ 0 2~i c
~ E c. c.
- C ~ t~ \ l'~ N l+. r. f. C.
NoRh 206 -38241 013 Year
SOUIh -0 2 5881 5 0 00 --0--North Leg -6-South leg -,6-Easl leg
East 7461 -1457428 0 99 j ~E-Wesl leg -~31~Tolal Inlerseclion Volume Linear (East Leg)
West 777.8 -1519929 0 98 ~
i Llnear (VYesl Leg) Linear (South Leg) Linear (Norih Leg)
Total 7722 -1504858 0 98
KCN1: SIGVaLIZED IN' ''SECTIOV StJL'-UtA.QY Versioa 2.4c 11-20-1996
Centt _ For Microcomputers In Transpor. ..ion
Streets: (E-W) SPRAGUE (N-S) FARR
, Analyst : CGP File Ivame : FAl?RSPP.A. HC9
Area Type• Other 11-20-96 60MIN
Comment • COLTIITS TF..KEN 6-11- 90
~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Iv'orthbound ~ Southbound
~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ( L T R
I---- ----I----
No. Lanes 1 1 3< ~ 1 3< ~ > 1 < ~ > 1 <
Volumes 1 15 1376 981 63 1024 191 74 34 551 37 45 7
PHF or P:{1510 92 0.92 0.9210.92 0.92 0.9210.92 0.92 0.9210.92 0.92 0.92
Lane W(ft)112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 ~ 12.0
Grade 1 0 1 0 • ~ 0 ~ 0
a Heavy Vehl 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 2
Parking (YIN) N I (YIN) N I (YIN) N , I (YIN) N
Bus Stops ~ 0l 0l 0) 0
Con. Peds ( 0l 0) 0l 0
Ped Button I(Y/N) N I(Y/N) N ((Y/N) N i(Y/N) N 'Arr Type 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 1 3
RTOR VoZs I 0l 0l 0l 0
Lost Time 13.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3 0013.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Sharel
Prop. Prot. I
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
E3 Left * INB Left *
Thru * I Thru *
Right * ( Right *
Peds I Peds
113 Left * ISB Left *
Tnru * I Tnru *
Right * I Right *
Peds I Peds
N3 Right JEB Right
SB Right IWB F.ight
Green 4.OA 45.Oa IGreen 19.OA
Yellow/F,.D 4.0 4.0 IYellow/AP. 4.0
Cycle Ler.gth: 80 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 TMS
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group. Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach:
rlvr►ts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 111 1770 0.145 0.063 23.0 C 7.2 B
, TR 3181 5532 0.554 0.575 7.0 B
WB L 111 1770 0.615 0.063 30.3 D 7.3 B
TR 3204 5573 0.389 0.575 6.1 B
NB LTR 332 1328 0.533 0.250 18.1 C 18.1 C
SB LTR 335 1340 0.290 0.250 15.8 C 15.8 C
Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.553
- - -
72
- - .
HCM: SIGNaLIZED Ilv :SECTIOV SUi01aRY Version 2.4c. 12-18-1996
Center For rlicrocomputers In Transportation
Streets (E-W) SPRAGUE (N-S) L'vIVERSITY
Analyst. CGP File 'Name: UNIVSPRP► HC9
Area Tyr>e: Other 11-20-96 60MIN
Comment • COtJNiiTS TAKEN 5- 6- 96
~ Eastbound ~ PJestbound ( Northbound ~ Southbound
( L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R
r1o. Lanes ~ 1 3 < ( 1 3 < ( 1 2 < ~ 1 2 <
Volumes 1 80 1174 1311 167 836 591 143 131 851 154 196 69
PHF or P{1510.94 0.94 0.9410.94 0.94 0 9410.94 0.94 0.9410.94 0.94 0.94
Lane W(ft)112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 ,112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
o Heavy Veh~ 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 2
Parking (YIN) N I (YIN) N I (YIN) N I (YIN) N
Bus Stops ( 0l 0l 0) 0
Con. Peds ~ 0l 0l 0l 0
Ped Button (YIN) N (YIN) N ((Y/N) N I(Y/N) N
Arr Type ~ 3 3 ~ 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3
RTOR Vols ~ 0l 0l 0l 0
Lost Time 13.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00
Prop. Sharel
Prop. Prot.1
Signal Operations
Phase Cor%bination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB LeLt * INB Left *
Thru * I Thru *
P.ight% * I Right *
Pzds I Peds
1riB Lef t * * ISB Lef t *
Thru * * I Thru *
P.igh ` * * I P.ight *
Peds I Peds
A13 P.ig JE3 Right
SB RiSZt IWB P.ight
Green 7.OA 3.OA 29.OP iGrepn 9.OA 16.0A
, Yellow/A.? 0.0 4.0 4.0 ( Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0
Cycle Le::gth. 80 secs Phase combination order. # 1 r2 4"- 3 ~5 n6
Intersection Performance Summary
Lana Group: Ad] Sat v/c g/C Approach:
Cao Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
EB L 88 1770 0.960 0.050 85.0 F 18.7 C
T? 2064 5504 0.740 0.375 15.0 B
Yi3 L 243 1770 0.731 0.138 28.6 D 12.1 8
TR 2559 5533 0.409 0.463 9.3 B
NB L 221 1770 0.687 0.125 27.5 D 21.2 C
TR 745 3506 0.322 0 213 17.3 C
SB L 221 1770 0.741 0.125 30.2 D 22.1 C
TR 761 3581 0.389 0.213 17.6 C
Intersection Delay = 17.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C
Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12.0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0.651_
73
,
Glossary
Arterial Signalized street that is primarily used by commuting traffic Arterials usually
allow access to adjacent facilities and roads
Delay: The additional travel time experienced by a traveler due to a transportation
situation Can be used to quantify levels of service
Demand Volume or Demand The traffic volume needed to reasonably accommodated
vehicle or pedestrian flow
Capacity The maximum rate of vehicle or pedestrian flow that a traffic facility or lane
segment can be expected to handle in a specified time frame
Gross Leasible Area(GLA): Gross Leasible Area is all of the total floor area, usually
measured in square feet, that is designed for tenant occupancy and client use(Trip
Generation, 1991)
' I. T.E. Trip Generation or Trip Generation Refereoce(1991) Nationally accepted
compilation of traffic counts, surveys, and historical data that give a valid account of land
uses based upon factors such as gross leasable area, number of employees, occupied
rooms, etc This is the fifth edition available by the Institute of Transportation Engineers
from 1991
~ Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition(1994): Reference manual that presents
operational, design, and planning capacity analysis for a broad range of transportation
facilities This manual is a nationally accepted manual on transportation planning and
design
Levels of Service(LOS) A qualitatrve measure used to describe the operational
conditions of a traffic facility Usually rate by LOS A-F, with A being the most favorable
rating, and F being the most unfavorable rating
74
Peak hour The hour or hours in a day when traffic has reached the ma,~cimum, countable
volume A M and P M peak hours are usually the morning and evening rush hour Peak
generator is the highest volume that a development or operating business will have in one
hour
Phase The part of a signal cycle allocated to a specific traffic movement of combination
of traffic movements
Rate of Flow or Flow Rate The equivalent hourly rate that vehicle or pedestrian
volumes can be moved past in a specified location or segment
Remote Pad: A facility or structure accountable for study, but not attached to the main
facility or structure being studied For University City, this would include retail stores
within the property confines of the development(i e fast food, banks, etc.)
Trip Generation The predicted traffic volumes that a development or facilrty is
expected to generate The volume is usually given in passenger cars per hour per
lane(pcphpl) Maximum trip generation refers to the maximum volumes that is expected
to be produced by a facility
Trip Distribution The expected or anticipated directional flow allocation of observed or
predicted traffic volumes within the transportation network being observed or designed
Threshold Study or Threshold Analysis: A report that verifies that a full traffic study is
not warranted for a project or development A threshold analysis must verify that a
project or development will not
1 Adversely modify the existing transportation network,
2 Effect or the intersection level of service or lower the level of service below an
acceptable level, and
3 Increase the demand on the transportation network by more than 5% of existing
capacity
~
Valley Couplet Planned transportation network that will renovate Sprague Avenue and
construct new Second Avenue so that they relieve the capacity between downtown
Spokane and the Spokane Valley
V/C Ratio The Volume/Capacity ratio is used to describe the demand flow rate to
capacity for a traffic facility Can be used to categorize levels of service
75