ZE-017-96
~ . .
:
.
f
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
RE Zone Reclassification from Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) Zone to ) C0NCLUSIUNS
_ Uhban Residential-22 _(UR-22) Zone ) AND DECISION
Applicant David A Katcher ) RECEIVED
File No ZE-17-96 )
FE6 10 Ny/
1. SUlViMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECIAGI?1Engineering
Proposal: Zone reclassification from the Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) zone to the Urban
Residential-22 (LJR-22) zone, for development of 16 multi-family residences on approximately
1.1 acres
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions
11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Heanng Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the
evidence of record and adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applieant David A Katcher, 810 South Pierce Road, Spokane, WA 99206
Address: 512 South University, Spokane, Washington
Loeation: Generally located west of and adjacent to University Avenue, east of Oberlin
Road, south of 4" Avenue, in the NE of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington
Legal Deseription: Descnbed in application submitted
Zoning: Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
Comprehensive Plan Cptegory: The property is designated in the Urban category of the
Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and is also within the Pnonty Sewer Service
Area, Urban Impact Area and Aquifer Sensitive Area designated in the Comprehensive Plan.
Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division
of Building and Planrung on May 24, 1996
Site Description: The site is approximately 1 1 acres in size, is rectangular-shaped and is
level The property has a dilapidated single-family reSidence and garage on its northeast portion
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-9b Page 1
. ~
.
.
Surrounding Conditions: The site fronts along University Road, which is designatcd by
the County Artenal Road Plan as a 100-foot-wide Pnncipal Artenal The south half oT the west
portion of the site fronts Oberlin Road, which meets Fifth Avenue at the west border of thc site
Neither Oberlin Road or Fifth Avenue are through streets The sub~ect property is directly south
of a community residential facility, and directly north of a former single-family resIdcnce
converted into a full service hair salon While the predominant land uses in the area are single-
family residences, hlgher density residential zoning and uses can be found along University Road
near the site and at vanous locations north and south of the site The Spokane 'I'ransit Authonty
University Park and Ride facility is located one-half block north of the subject property south of
Fourth Avenue The University City Mall is located at the southwest corner of Sprague Avcnue
and University Road, approximately four blocks north of the site Sprague Avenue is a major
east-west traffic comdor in the Spokane Valley area
Project Description: Application to rezone a 1 1 acre site ro the UR-22 zone for development
of 16 multi-family residences The site plan illustrates the slte divided into four parcels each
with a two-story four-plex unit and six parkuig spaces, plus a total of four extra parking spaces
for recreational vehlcles Division of the site as configured would require subdivision approval
Access for the easterly two four-plexes would be via University Road, while access for the
westerly two four-plexes would be via Oberlin Road The site will be served with public sewer
The Central Valley School Distnct has requested that the applicant enter into a voluntary
agreement to mitlgate the impact of the project on the school distnct
B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Zoning Code Chapters 14 402 and 14 622
Hearing Date and Location: June 19, 1996, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
Notices: Mailed May 30, 1996 by applicant
Posted May 31, 1996 by applicant
Published May 29, 1996
Compliance The legal requtrements for public notice have been met
Site Visit: June 17, 1996
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure)
Testimony:
Louis Webster, Planner II Scott Engelhard
Division of Buildmg and Planning Division of Engineenng and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
David Katcher
810 South Pierce
Spokane, WA 99206
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 2
4
• .
Items Noticed: Spoklne County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code,
Spokane County Code, County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0294
C. ZONE RECLrASSIi`ICATION ANALYSIS:
In considering a rezone application, `Vashuigton case law generally provides that (l) there
is no presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that
conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and (3) the
rezone proposal must bear a substantial relationship to Uhe public health, safety or welfare
Parkndee v Seattle, 98 Wn 2d 4541 462 (1978): Biarnson v. KitsaD Cou.ntv. 73 Wn App 840
(1995) Spokane County Zonmg Code Section 14 402 020 (1)(2) indicates that consistency with
the Gomprehensive Plan, detrllnent to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant
critena to consider when a site-specific rezone is sought
The proposed rezone must also be consistent with the Spokaile County Zorung Code, the
State Envuon.mental Policy Act, the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, and other
applicable land use regulafions. Conditions may be imposed to assure the consistzncy of the
proposal with appllcable regulations
The followin~ findings o£fact and conclusions are made-
1 The nronosal izenerallv conforms with the Spokane Countv Generalized Comnrehensive Plan
A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearinla body in making a rzzone
decision. Be1c11er v Kitsan CountY, 60 V11n. App 949, 953 (1991) Deviatton fiom a
comprehensi-ve plan does not necessarily render a rezone illegal, only general conformancE is
required Bassaiu v Countv Conunissioners. 70 VVn. App 389, 396 (1993)
The Buildulg and Planning Divtsion Staff Repart found that the appllcafiion was generally
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan category for the site is
Urban The Urban category is intended to provide the opporturuty For development of a
"citylike" environment, which mcludes vanous land uses and intenslve residential development
served by a high level of public facilities and seryices (i e. paved roads, public sewer and water,
storm water systems, poLce and fire protechon and other features) It is pri.manly a residential
category of single-fa.mily, two-family, mulrifamily and condomimum buildma-s The Urban
category also contzmplates some neighborhood commercial, light industrial uses, and public and
recreational facilities
The Urban category allows for a vast ranae of residenhal densities, generally from onz unit
per acre to 17 units per acre The category promotes the concept that single-family uses will be
isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, while the more tntensive uses such as liaht iiidustnal
and neighborhood commercial will be located near the hea-v-ily traveled streets Vlultifamily uses
will usually (but not always) be a transitional use located beriveen single-family residential and
more intensive areas. The Urban category mdicates that the base net densiry for multi-family
dwelling areas may be increased beyond 17 dwelling units per acre through "bonus allowances"
or "bonus densiries", within developed areas where utilities, artenals, schools, and commuruty
Cacilihes have already been established. CompreUensive Plan. DeGision Guideline 1 1 2
HE Findinc.,;s, Conclusions and Decision ZE-l 7-96 Page 3
The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone eenerally provldes for residential clensities up to 22
uruts per acre Under certain circumstances, the Zoning Code allows "bonus densitics" in the
UR-22 zone for multifainily housing up to 27 dwelling wiYts per acre Zoning Code Chapter
14 820. In thzs case, the applicant proposes to rezone a 1 1 acre siie to the UR-22 'L017C 10 1llOw
development of 16 dwelling units at a density of approximately 13 units per acrc This is Nvell
«►ithin the density range recommended m the Urban category and considerably less t}aan the
maximum residennal densit}r allowed in the UR-22 zone The purpose and intent section of the
UR-22 zone, Zomng Code 14 622 100, states as follows-
The purpose of the UR-22 zone is to set standards for the orderly development
of residential property in a manner that providcs a desirable laving
enviranment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures ihe
protection of property values It is intended that this zone be used to add to
the vanety of housing types and densities, and as an implementation tool for
the Comprehensive Plan Urban Cateaory. General charactenstics of these
areas include paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to schools and
libraries, and a full line of public servlces including manned fire protzction
and public transit accesstbility. Offices are permitted in the UR-22 zone i.n
order to provide sonle of the service needs generated by high-Intensity land
uses The hlahest densitv residential zone. UR-22 is intended pnmanlv for
multiole-familv dwellines and is usuallv located adaacent to mator or
secondarv arterials It is used as a transition between low or mediuni densitv
multinle-familv uses and intensive commercial or low intensitv inciustnal uses
and to nrovide for lueher densitv housina- in locations close-to emuloNmicilt.
sbonoinsz and niator transoortatlon where movements ofneonle can be liandled
efficientlv and wlth least overall adverse imoact [Emphasis added]
The proposal implemenis ihe locational cntena for multz-family bousmg in the UR-22 zone
because it is located along a Pnncipal Artenal, a major artenal, and is close to public transit
facilities. The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that hlgher-density
developments such as multi-family dwelling areas should be located " with near or clirecl
access to the major artenal systems rather than on intenor neig,hborhood streets"
Comprehensive Plan, Objective 1 1 b. Deciston Guideline 1 13 of the Urban category
recommends that multi-family dwelling structures exceeding three dwelhng units be located
adjacent to designated arterials, and also near existing or planned public transit routes Whtle the
westerly half of the project accesses onto local access streets, traffic can readily access
University Road within a few blocks by proceeding either (a) south on Oberlin Roaci one block,
then east on 6`' Avenue for one block, or (b) west on 5`hAvenue for one block, soulh on
Raymond for one block, then east on 6~' Avenue for rivo blocks It is also significant that the
applicant is not proposing the extension of 5' Avenue through the site to Uruversity, which could
subject the residential neighborliood west of the site to even more traffic than the proposal would
cyenerate There is no indication in the record th3t the local access streets to the west cannot
support the additional traffic from the proposal.
The proposal is also located close to employment, shopping mnd major transportation, as
recommended for multi-family housing in the UR-22 zone The site is also locatecl tn an area
along Uruversity Road south of Sprague Avenue that is in transitlon from single-family
residential uszs to hieher density housing, office uses and neighborhood commercial uses The
HE FYndings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 4
.
. .
property immedrately north of the site is zoned UR-22 and is improved with a community
residential facility, which property extends the sarne distance west of University Road as the
current site. Further to the nortb along iheJwest side of Umversity Road is land zoned UR-22
and Regional Business (B-3) The property immediately south of site is zoned UR-3 5 but is
used for a hau salon. Furiher to the south on the west side of University Road, between 6`h
Avenue and 8' Avenue, is a parcel zoned LJrban Residential-7 (LJR-7). Du-ectly across from the
site, along the east side of Unuversity Road; is land zoned UR.-22
The proposal also implements the policies of the Urban category which promote fill-in
development in estabhshed development areas having adequate power supplies, water, santtary
sewer and draiuage systems, arcerials and com.muruty facilities have been established See
Comprehensive Plan, Objechve 1 l.a and Decision Guidelines 1.1 1 and 1 1 2. The proposal is
within an established development area where utilities, artenals, schools and community
facilities already exist The area around the site has already been developed for residential
purposes The applicant is willing to enter into a voluntary agreement with the school distnct to
mltigate the impact of the proposal on schools Balfour Park is located less than a mile north of
the site, and University High School wrth its considerable playfields is less than a mile south of
the proposal. The reFerenced Urban calegory policies encourage higher density residential
development wliere the fill-in cntena is met, to zconomically support public service systems by
increasing the cost-effeciiveness of extending utthties and public sewer and facilities, and to hmlt
new unsewered development over the Spokane Aquifer. See Comprehensive Plan, Glossary,
de6nition of "F11-m development" The higher density requested by the applicant will facilYtate
the extension oCpublic sewer and water to the site Tlie proJect is located withm the Aquifrr
Sensittve Area, where the extension of pubhc sewer is hiQhly encouragecl.
Objecti-ve 1.5 e of the Urbaul categoiy states that when a neighborhood expenences pressurz
for change in character; such change shall be permitted upon appropnate review Objective
1.1 c and Decision Guideline 1 13 of the Urban cacegory indicate that when multi-family
dwellings are located adjacent to single-family areas, careful consideration must be giveil to the
density and designs of the multi-family development to ensure protection of the amenittes of
the single-family areas Objective 1.5 f states that the profile, especially the heigllt of the
existuag neighborhood should be considered when evaluating multi-family developments. The
structural height of the proposal, in relation to the structure lieight oF nearby structures, and
whether new structures wjll have a positive or negzitive impact upon a neighborhood's
architectural character, are considered important factors in this regard See Comprehensive
Plan, Decision Guideline 1.5 8
The proposal generally implements the above-referenced policizs The density of tlie project
is much lower than the maxiinum residential density pecmitted in the UR-22 zone The site plan
indicates the height of the four-plex buildings at two stones; and the Heanng Examiner has
limited the building height of such structures to 23 feet The Heanng Examiner has also added a
requuement that a stx-foot-high sight obscunng fence as required by Section 14 622 365 be
shown along the west property line of the proposal, adjacent to the adjacent Urban Resldential-3.5
zone The residenrsal neighborhood west of the site is an older neighborhood, and could
expenence some renewal froni development of the proJect. The desigri of the proposal also keeps
parking and cuculahon to the intenor of the site
HE Findines, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 5
2 Condihons in the area in which the propertv is located have chaneed substanliallv since the
nrooertv was last zoned
1.n applying the changcd circumstances test, courts have lookecl at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rcione pi oposal,
and changes on the property itself The Zonmg Code references changes tn "economic,
tecbnological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spolclne Caunfiy
Zoning Code Section 14.442 020 (2) Washington courts have not required a"strong" shnwing
of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to bejudged on its own facts Bassant v Countv
Com.missioners, 70 Wn. App 389, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements polir.ies af a
comprehensive plan. Bia.rnson, at 846, Save 4ur Rural Environment v Snohomish Countv, 99
Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983)
A number of changes have occurreci in the area that support the rezone proposal Tl-ie last
zonang of the property may be considered as the onginal zoning of the properly in 1958 under the
Gounry Zonmg Ordinance, since the area-wide rezone that took place in Spokane County under
the Zomng Code between 1986 and 1991 was not site specire Such changed canclitions Lnclude
the extension of public sewer to the area supportive of higher density housing, thc widening of
University Road south of Sprague Avenue to four lanes, and mcreased growth in the Srakane
Valley area
3 The oronosed rezone does bear a substantial relattonshiq and is not detrimental to ihe nublic
health. safetv and eeneral welfare
General consisteney with a local government's comprehensive plan ts releva.iit in determining
whether a rezone bears a sLtbstantial relationship to the public welfare Bassani, at 396-98 As
noted, the proposal generally confornls to the Comprehenstve Plan
While no adverse testimony to the proposal was presented at the public heanng, thrEe letters
of opposition were submitted to the record by property owners residing along 5"' Avcniie and 6'h
Avenue west of the site Vanous concerns were expressed, including concerns over increased
traffic along narrow neighborhood streets, a decrease in property values, lack of paxks, excessive
building heig,ht and spot zoning These issues have been properly mittgated, as discussed above
The Heanng Examiner also gives deference to the reconzmendation of the County Division of
Bwlding and Planning, which recommended approval oFthe proposal
4 The Droaosed zone chanhe comnlies with the provisions of the State Environinental Policv
Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance
The procedural requirements of chapter 43 21 C RCW and chapter 1_1 10 of the Spokane
Counry Code have been niet The Hearing, Examiner concurs wrth the Determination of
Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning
HE Findtngs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 6
. 5. The nroDOSaI. as condttionetl. complies with the Urban Residential-22 (CTR-22) zoue, the
Snokane Countv Zonine Code (SCZC), and annlicable land use reLTulations
The proposed site plan is considered by the Division of Building and Planninc, as general in
nature, with detailed ad.ministrative review to occur administratively to determine compllance
with the Zoning Code and the conditions of approval The site plan will have to be re-vised to
show the reqwced screening along the west property boundary The proposal otherwlse is in
comphance with all appllcable regulations
M. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a zone
reclassificahon is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies
spectfied below.
Failu.re to comply with the conditions of tlus approval may result in revocation of this
approvai by the Heanng Exammer. This approval does not u~aive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with junsdlction over land development.
SPOKANE COUNTY I)IVISION OF BIJIL,DING AND PLAYNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, as amended.
2 The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept
presented to the Heanng Body Variations when approved by the Division Director/designee,
may be permitted, includtng, but not limited to building location landscape plans and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the
Spokane County Zoning Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be
nlaintalned.
3 Approval is required by the Dtrtctor of the Division of Building and Planning designee of a
spectfic lighting and signing ptan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building
pemiits
4 Duect ho
ght from any extenor area ligheing fixture shall not extend vver the property
boundary.
5 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for ma.intenance acceptable to
ihe Division Dtrector/desi~nee shall be suUmitted with a performance bond, or other suitable
guarantee, for the proJect pnor to release of building pernzits. Landscaping shall be mstalled ancl
maintatned so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired
6 The Divlsion of Building and plarining shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to avanety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notlce shall serve as
public nofiice of the conditions of approval affectine tile property in question The'I'itle Notice
HE FindinL:ys, Conclusions and Decisron ZE-17-96 Page 7
.
should be recorded within the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Spokane Counry Divlsion of Building and Plaiini ng The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] is the subject of a land !ise acfion hy
a Spokane Gou.nty Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ ]imposiilg a vanety of
special development conditions File No [ ] is available for inspection and copytng in the
Spokane County Division of Bwlding and Planning
7 The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at tlle earliest possiUle
stage in order to be mformed of code requirements administered/enforced ad authorizeci by the
State BuildLng Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressmg, fire apparatus
access rods, fire hydrantlflow, approved water systems, building accessibility, constructiGi7 type;
occupancy classification, exihng, extenor wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note
The Division of Buildmg and Planning reserves the nght to confirm the actual adrlress at the time
of building pernut )
8. The four-plex buildings will have a height lunitation of 23 feet
9 Per Section 14 622 365 of the Spokane County Zonung Code, the site plan must be revised
to show a six foot high "concrete, masonry or decorative block wall, solid landscaping, or sight-
obscuring fence" along that portion of thE west property Lne adJacent to the Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3 5) zone
SPOK,ANE COUN'TY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Pnor to release of a buildina permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2 Applicant shall submlt for approval by the Spolcane County Engineer drainage and access
plans
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall Ue submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer T-he design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accoadance
with standard engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portlon of the project which is to be occupied or travcled by vehicles
4. Roadway standards, typical roadway sectlons and drainage ptan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of Cou.nty Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicavle to
this proposal
5 No construction work is to be performed withtn the existing or proposed nght of way until
a permlt has been issued by the County Engineer All tvork tvithin the public road neht of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 8
• -
.0
6 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies University Road as a 100 foot Pnncipa1 Artenal.
The existing right of way width of 73 feet is not consistent with that specificd in the plan In
order to implement the artenal road plan it is recommended that a strip of property 13 5 feet m
width alona the Uruversity Road frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired
by Spokane County at the Ume when arterial improvements are made to Uruversity Road.
7. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utillties either underground or
overhead affecring the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligahon for adjustments or relocation
regard.ing these utilities. The applicant should check wrth the applicable utilrties and Spokane
County Engneer to deternune wbether the applicant or uhlity is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTB DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
2. Water service shall be caordmated through ihe Director of Uhlities, Spokane Count}l
3 Water service shall be by an exisang public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system wrlll be made available for the project and indivrdual service will be
provided to each lot Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authonzed
5 LJse of pnvate wells and water systecns is prohibited
SPOK.AIVE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wlde public sewer system is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit ts requtred.
2 Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Uhlities Dcpartrnent "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to
finahzation of the project and or the issuance of pernmt fo connect
3. Arrancemeots for payments of appllcable sewer charges must be made for pnor to issuance
of sewer connection permit.
4. Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 9
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CON'I'ROL AUTHORiTY
1. All au pollution regulations must be met
CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRIC'T
1 The owner shall negotiate with Central Valley School Distnct and submit a rccorded copy
of a voluntary agreement making provlsions_for pubhc schools pnor to finalization and recording
of the plat The agreement shall provide a wntten descnphon of the subject property to which
the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating
measures
The owner shall also nodfy any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to
purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
58 17.205, that adequate provisions for school facilities must be madz condihoned on a future
agreement between the platter and school distnct.
Voluntary agreements between the owner and scbool distnct shall conform to the
requirements of RCW Chapter 82.02
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 10
A
DATED this l Oth day of February, 1997
SPOKANE COUNTY HEAItING EXANIIiNEi R
~ dl ~ r , Ot-4,'
1VLcbael C. Dempsey, W SBA #8235
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGIIT TO f1PPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an applicatlon for a rezone is final and conclusive unles_s wlthul ten (10)
calendar days &om lhe Examiner's wntten decision, a party of record aggneved by such decision
files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washangton
Appeal procedures are otherwise set forth in County Resolution Nos 96-0632 and 96-0171,
and include the payment of an appeal fee of $225 as well as paying for producbon o#' a transcript
and cop►es of the official record The Board will hold a closed record hearing Following the
closed record heanng, t}le Board may affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the matter to the Heanng
Exammer
Pnor to appeal, the complete project file, including this decisaoa; is available for review at the
office of the Spokane County Hearulg Examiner. Copies of the file and eleccromc recording of the
public heanng conducted by the Hearing Examiner will be made avatlable at the cost provided by
County resolution or ordinance The office hours of the Spokane County Hearing Exaniiner are
generally Monday through Fnday, between the houxs of 8 00 a nl and 4 30 p.m Following any
appeal, the record will be filed with the Board of County Commissioners and may be inspectecl at
such office dunng normal business hours.
(T1us Decision was mailed by Certified 'Mail to the Applicant on Februa.ry 10, 1997)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-17-96 Page 11
- ~
f ~
. ~
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
As Bvii.`f PL.ANs uE:cEivLD
RE70NE FILE # ZE-v 17-96 -
Related file # i )
AARD ft ( DRZE-176-96 )
Date to Review 06/19/1996 # 2
Date to AA & DR 03106/1996 Time 1:15
Date Received 02/26/ 1996
Project Name UR-3.5 TO UR-22 FOUR 6 PLEXES No. Locs o No. Acres 1.2
Range - Tawnship - Section
=i5201.1029
SITE ADDRESS W UNIVERSITY S 512/S 4TN/N 6TH I'.ARCEL
Applicant's Name DAV[D KATCHER Phone /t 928-0123
Address 810 S PIERCE RD Phone 2N
SPOKANE WA 99206
FLOOD ZONE No W S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed
Billing Name Owner DAVID KATGHER En8ineer ROBERT REYNOLDS
Address Address 810 S PIERCE RD Company J PAUL RAMER & ASSOCIAT
SPOKANE WA 99206 Address 10115 N NEWPORT HWY
Signecl City SPOKANE,WA 99208-0779 Phone Phone 928-0123 Phone/FAX (509)467-5261 FAX {509}467-52
Date
Building Contact Person: LOR.CN LAKSHAS/LAUIS WEBSTER Phone 456-3675
Date Submitted Description initials
I / DATE FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
I~ FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 13 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
i/ DESIGN DEYIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
I ~ BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAIN AGE iTEM CALCULATED
i / DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
I 1 DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
06/ 19! 1990 HEARING QiA.~tit APPROVED )ENIED 'PCALED BCC
j j APPEALED PROlECT APPROVED ENIED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNTCIAN (SYLJSUZANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) ~
JZ;Y Uir-JWO-rCSIT-Y~
3y C R P Z_~ g. S~ .
~
~
~ •
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET AS Bl'IL7' PLANS RECENED
0
DR REZONE FILE #ZE . ~
t
Related File # ( )
AARD It ( DRZE-176-96 )
Date to Review it Date to AA & DR 03 /06/ 1996 Time 1:15
Date Received 02/26/1996 .
.
Project Name UR-3.5 TO UR-22 FOUR 6 PLEXES No. Locs o r'o. Acres 1.2
Range - Township - Secaan I
asaoi.io29 '
SITE ADDRESS W UNIVERSITY S 512/S 4THlN 6TH PARCEL / ('J 0
Applicant's Name DAVID KATCHER Phone ii 928-0123 ~
~
Address 810 S PIERCE RD Phone 2#
~
SPOKANE WA 99206 FLOOD ZONE IYo W S School 356 Date Conciitions Wiile:l
Billing Name Owner DAVID KATCHER Engineer
Address Address 810 S PIERCE RD Comp:~ly
SPOKANF WA 99206 Address
Signed Phone 928-0123
Phone PIIUIlc: ~ FAX
Date
Builciing Cuntact Person: Phone # 46-3675
Date Submitted Descriptiun Initials
DATE FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVfiD COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTEDIDATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS ~
;
BOND QUANTiTIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED ;
,
DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED i
DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
HE,AR1NCi EXAM APPROVL-D )ENIL'D )!'i .1l (:f) f3('i '
APPEALED PROJECT 4PPROVED FrMEU
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SY"LiSU"LANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATNE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
~
• e *
~E.~L7°36
/ . - ~ - - - - , - - ' = - - - - _ - ~
~ O . • • 16 ' • ~i
~ . ~ ~
~ J'•` ~s":~' w • y~ ~ IEL
• 93 1
~ a e
1 ecl~ ' ' l..K! '
. ~ ~
0 O.
A L 1..
~ .
a.. Qd 1 O Pd
V
.a cc oc ~
Q PMlid ~ o~A t A1 0~~VE, f B A
J
~ Q J • ~ ~ ~ Q i
~ ' Q it1V6R8t~ ~ ~ . Or
2 x
~ Fire :
a tarii+o~, ~P csus 11EL.I99S
~5~ _ 7~~ ►a. . • a t
~
~IS KA Cou PJY • FZOA-D.___ . NR 23120
I w ~ / ~
AVE
.St 04 s ~'i~°R MILWAUKE£ RA/LROAD ~
'-I
. . rct /Svs cl rd€
n
F'pVR7H IQ►VE. OVRTM ~AV
d ~ ar ~c
u
° lx. W ~ ~ ~
SKT H
d ph . ~
TM i
o ~ Q > M 7 SEvENTH ~ I
$ 5 ~ . T
3 ~►vE ~ 8 TH TN ElG14TH AY
7
~ • 9 TH 9rN
cs 0'~ W.
• • ~ ~
IoT O'TN
~ ~ . ~
. ~
G ~
• ' z
0~ ~ T" /~y - _ . .
`C"ODv., • '
O ~ ' t r: , ~
ITH
`•♦G ~L
• $ o , ,
~ ~ r . m ~ I I
a - - -.A I a a%
~ ~ ~ . • ~i
ST. _ . , c . d f81o L
, ~r ~ WI I
, ~ • Q
~ ~ • r . I
~ . /991
~ "r ~ " •
r L~ T T I
w
' ~ • ~
• ~ ~ ~ 1'a~
6! 19/96 HE Siaff Report for ZE- ] 7-9b Page 1
s
. '
~o~~ , _ ~
■
° ZECO-311
~
I oco ~
- , " ~ ~ . ~ t` ~
Y
~
? J 3~ R► V 1.~
?A 1 -.4 0~ ,
~ ~
O ~ d d, p o • z11
;
Q a J uF{ N, P,
~ p
' p a N 1 : ~ l~R ~ ~ VR'Z "
UR' VR~3 al
ZZ .bE~•/~~•
V ►
SWO R2 ~ uA•t~ ` ~ '
~%a
o
~ J ~31~
~
u
~0~~°~T Y ~t L-RpAp
a `
HtItWAIIIcE~~.-
K ~ ~,,..•►-''"'.r . ' .
s9-9 q ouA ~ N
~ ui SrFj,P + • v
.
V
p 2~
.
1 t FC3Qa~~ r; ~ v~ 22 ~ s••
t CIL tr 4 5~ v~ E~r~~"`~ H'1
.
7
~ w v+
a W $T~ ' ►O-1N 1
~ a ~uR-z? a, . 9 TN
r ~~Tr
, id' • ~ 10
e1 ~Q
• - `
~r p~~ O '
H
4en ,~vF ~ ,
i j fh a ,
'
: ID s d"
4 it J ~ ~ V _ ~ p ~
,
a R•2 z ~
7
~ M
/
; ~
M~ ~ ~
_ UR 't • ' N
1991
. :
Z ~ .•,N~. ~ ~ pag
A
.
~ „r \ ■
O . -
Jy ~ - , - , :
foT ZE_1l96
6I19196 tff Repolt
~
y
Z:E F7O 6
1
~ s
,
a atsr
P8T
Ffllt ~ ~ ` • •
• ~4 r
:css.~s cr+n Q. c„K!
:
t - ~ ► "'r'
` r seu;,cssz+a`
Ui . , k. • - ~
i~ ~ • - ' ~r~ i
~ • Q p a ~ ~ . i~ ! ~ ,~c s ~
• _ U ~ ~ ~ i ~ y - V ~ ~ a~ [ _ '
187
i 16
ka~~l$
s Wst
,*t
h
a a Tan
~ $ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - v,s~.fdr ..1.~~
st j ~d • ~ ' 9 yl4Lj~~' ~ 1Y~lr~.... ~ ♦ ' 1
~ . ~ ~ d q i hw~u lk
• .'~y ;1 a , ~1 e ' ` ► , .
~
r.:-~~ : _ , _ j •
~ Ai
r •
P81k. e t $td . ~1 I
~ T ~ i' J ~ ~ . . . • . ` o O - ~ ~fl ~ AVIRd ~
' ~ ~ • ~ •~y,_. ~O/i r r c' ~ ~y„~ _ L . •1
, ~SZw,lYl'f~Y ID
L 1` S~ rAV~. 0 I~ J
° " ~ Mltw •g~ • • ;~yy sTM ,~R, ~
t~'VL
- e ~ • • • ~ M - ~F_
1~ ~ . - - . ~
M~ ~ t~Cf
mD ~ ~20~q~ ; M ,._.Z'-~ . 1r.JO • i
• ~ •,,'~~.t , '~'i.1 - - ~
_ • • ~ . ~ _
R j~Qw►
•r A ~ I L ~~,,~yS ~f~r ♦ r"
O - b ►~.s ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Q~~ C~7 ~..Uy ,
~ ♦ q V « ~ , ,a-,~.-.." ~
~ ~I?~N ~ ► f
.,~1 ' ; qh • ; .
_ ' ~ ~ e ~ p+ d C - - _,_„_r.~+. • ~ i
%T ~ • It 0
.r~~ ti / ` • ~ ..141„~ ~ '
~ ~ . ~ ~
- /t. I • ` + 1a
y~ ~ ~ j~ Q a ~ 7~ ~ ~ • ' s :
~ ~ a -o M T
• ~ ~ •i ~ ^ ~z~,.,...~-.yl"__'._ ~»'~''3 r^+~•. ~ri~
' > : l~~ f ~ ` • ~ ~ ~
r r .146
~.j
.L4.+
. 28 , • ~
! • • ~ vM ~ ~ A ~ ~ r ..._.j~,
28 ~
` ` > , 0 ♦a • - , ' 0
. 1 ~ ~,r'„~~•~~ ~ t , ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ - ~ Y
~ \ 0 • ~ ♦ ' a f ~ ~m~~ - ~ ~ ~ .
~ * • • MA ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~ •W-+.` ~
. i • f ' ~ `t~ ~ ~ ` _ _ ~ ~1 J~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ •,n
_
7
`4 t,.. e e'~','ra
994 1"
. ~ ~ • f • ' • ~ L S q~~ ~ ~ ( ~ , a a ~n`-+a ~ : .
. ~
. . ~ , y I ' • ..,~.I sJiK'li 4 a1~ L~~ ~~.~~tW~r
~ . ,i, a f''~ , ! ° s ~ 't 33 f..,.33
;n.~', '1 ~ a
~ - ~ Page 3
.
6! 19196 HE Staff ReP°rt for ZE-17-96
~ ~
7=,"6
I
WBte r Pork
19 3 4 Toflf~ t~~ ° " ~811e?► ~ s10n 1 ~ I~ I
.
~t ~ • • : f ~ MI~SIQN %tr I
r
A000,~ ~
t i ~ 1~ 1 ~ I r' ~1 ~ ~ 2
. •
nooNE Ad ~ l
- fi3 '12to I
i _ Wny 16 1Yorth P1ncs ; i
Jr Nlpth 9ch `
.
Wet
Q Tonk
~ j ~ I r~' ` • ~ ° ~.d ~ { VALttY ~i
» ~ I ~ ` :i r.~ . _`r-•sQ~0 r~ ~ ~
i - rh
1980 u4
.
' • - _ ~ , T'"~
e l hm 11 .0 a,M,. . Ir 56
S n r ~ ~ 1 AIEM~
t~ iO'IM~ = I
B ~ - - - - ' ~
\ tl ( tiY • , ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ ' • ~ \
~ • ~ - ~
I
4r~~,~ o~ c4etg~ `
. ~
. ~
~1020
I ' , A ~ • . . ~ ~ - V ` ` . ~
~ L ~
O 0f
•
l ~ _ ~ ' _ .~~~i ' ~ 1 =
~ ~ n ~ t AI~, . ~ ~1-~ ~ ~
- • ~ ,i~
t2rH`
~ • ~ w o
1
n, ' Tenk
I ~ S 1 1 ~ ~ S4 , S a ~ l
~
` . ti' n1tl ~ 1 _ . ~ 1 •-r =
7 i ' ; ° r , ~ • a~ - ~.~~i
ED iripn { 0p,~~
-j .
-Z
~ It ` ~~y i, • ~ 28 `L{l67m"
~ ~ t~ , ` ~ " ~ {l Kt1f ~
o $ ~
28 - i 'A
• ~ _
,
0 ' a ' - - ~ ~ ~ ~K~►~_:Jl.._ ~
♦ a~ J0~ ~ `
a _ r ~ / ~ i 1 a ~
~
1 nd - f ~
s
- - ~
1 b j ~ ~ Y
33 33 ~
R ~ p o v o+~~ _ ~-_A
~ ' • _
\ ~ ~ •
~ Page 4
` Gi 19/96 T-E Staff Report for ZE-17-9G
~1~ ~ re I• I~, ~i+►~~~~ N ~ ~~~r~~l ~a
N , „ .e. '
. I i Ic
d4W ~
' s~m d ~i N ~I~'d ~
y ad~
~ '
►,,~~<L.
Ch w
1~ in 8 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~r 'y.,~,l►-~ ra ' ~ ~
ko
~ ~11 ~ h J
kQ J~ 1 i-Yr ~ .~.f~--1,' --n~r~ : • •x ~
~ r:•~ l 0 1~ A ` C F C 1~ ~ 11 • i A 1~~
am t p m
~
~ ?I p11) ~ ~ ~
11
= FJ 0~' A R~ mit,
m ~
N oo ,
w.ue m
~p ~ ~ t ~ ' ~ , ''al,~da• ~ wr ~c u.~a n... ~ ~
c+ 0 •q p~ 8 ~oJ: I~'~( I r' ~ ~:L t II 0 e(
a n y ~~~r~ 9 a~ r ~r
fi p~ ~l T t,• ~`~nt < <q ~ '
. •Ij~✓ ~
w~
~.r~r'rw4i~4h "?1 :1"1'-- f ~ r • ~ ~
~
~
~ IV8'' ,4
1 T ~
~I ;00 7rrl ~ ~ qp r~ I ~
tetJ1o ~n 10 IP •-.a 900 w..~ ~
A,.,, s..a } a t~.~.~ ~,•,r..,, ".e.
. ,
O
~ I A ~ sh~r R►
N ~ aeea i~~o'~; l~►, H p1e K Le'( 8 V it.. nra
'►'i 1 I \ , ~ ~j~oo st Rt a,1,`` ~s'
F., • u, , ~n, ...,.y. , ~
Q ~ ~t►~~ ~ \ lA' ~ 1n \ ~ . ~0~` , I'~ IN ~ f~'!~ i
cn
1
c"
~ = i + ~irr.v r•~ ~ ~ } , ~ •
• ~ ~ 3ss 3s s 1 ,
7 ~s 36' ~ 36' ~
Ro T r•JW N t o'_
'
_ i W
~ 25' na,wwnr
ry EAfEMiMf Jis
~ 4~ 4wrN A*., 4,.ow A.e. ~ ~ ? ; ~ , . ~ ~
r le
~ ~p^ aT~ Drw t►wf , dwr 4M~T ~r I ~ y~ ~ ~ 1 .r
-1 ~
21 L IS If + ~cl N ~ cr. o ~
~ ~ . ' ` ~ ~~o sto►1' 2
~ , C 4 D r ~ LoT p y ~t, I ~ ,os ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~t y
~ o; 7,leo ~ rr n b 9f' . i.roe s~ r(
75~iK
fj•
~-.i~u.-_ -~y ~ ~o' \ ~..6d _ RvA_u"y_; ~
~ ~ xd r~; . ~ _ ~1 ~ ~T , ~ Pi.+w 7rwf A'a'` N I• - - f • + - ~ - - ; - !
L
~ 10' 5o+b►A ~ fAStintwT u s.. r
~ 3 ! tal fwK ~N + 90 6~4 US#Mr.t a' ftL• ~ 100 3
•wl Q 1
~ v ` 14 ~
0 i Y
~ ~ / ~ •rr~ °~P~~' S
110,1111
c ►r N,y►? l.~%01 a.h'y, .j lat•. (.-~al-•1
R nlf Rw
~ ~..5
1e'~ 1e'-~ ~e Q~d '
9 • lanJScaprJ Aaa A 7036 t9rt 208 Swenl l,T A 220 w Fi,
i ehdlC&p fQ A,t, c 6,s~c s~ Fr zos sw.0( w eea aeo w Ft
a 1o? SIZE$ A3C /(Q1y tyFj le.escarrJ A•t. B{D .9378 yF1 6«•k1,~~9 Arywt~ A6CD ~9'
cG toT Si:ts B,tD , Il,9Sq ij 1f f~+pe,~,ows A•-, A, 4878 yfr Go,,, 6,,,U,e~•t~ . A6en 2,100 qfi r 7~
~ uAl /IS e► lot , ~
P Fo+- +0►rr0 & d,olu c A.aa, G S,378 ycf ~irKrNS vpeu► ►,f,~~..~f pas ~f ~ied 1 Ru DAVID KARhar
U1 NO OF STORY , two lorypc.0,e.1 11r.u ~?D 6,57( ~~t (l~s r..u~~ll r-(+•sad r.o teT ~ 1.,j 1 Au 810 SwTq pltw Rd
$Po!'AUi W4 11101
~ 7 IN 9;8•OIl3 Ap~,l 3 N4L
L
! •
DIVISIOIV OF BUILDING AND I'LANNING REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HL, AItING EXANIINEi It
FRONi: CURtENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: JU1VE 19,1996
SUSJECT: ZE-17-96; ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FitOM URBAN
RESIDENTIA.L-3.5 (UR 3.5) TO UR13AN RESII)ENTIAL-22
(UR-22)
I. GEIVER.AL INTOItMATION
Applicant: David A. Katcher
S 10 S Pierce Road
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 928-0123
Contact Planncr: Louis Webstel•
Location: Generally located west of and_adjaceni to University Avenue, east
of Oberlin Road, south of 4th Avenue, in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Restdential-3.5 (UR 3.5) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for development of 16 multiple family residences
II. SITE INF'ORNgATION
A. Sitc Size: Approximately 1 1 acres
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive I'lan category of the subject
property is Urban and the subject property is within the Pnority Sewer
Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay
Zooe. Tlie Urban (U) Category is intended to provide the oppot-tunity for
development of a"city-li.ke" environment which i►icludes various land
uses. Due to the vanety and mix of land uses and activities found in the
Urban Category, there are few land use activities that would be
inappropriate. Residential net densities are suggested to range from 1 to
17 dwelling units per acre in the Urban category. The density proposed in
tlus application is 13.33 dwelling units per acre and is within the
suggested range. Mu1u-family structures will usually be a transitional use
located between single-family residential and the more intensive areas
Goal 1 1 of the Comprehensive Plan states "Encourage a variety of
housing types and densihes " Objective 1 l.b states " Higher density
developments such as multifamily and mobile home (manufactured
6/ 19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 6
• ~ J
homes) paxks should be located with direct or near direct access to the
major arterial systems rather than on interior neighborhood streets Access
to public transportation should also be considered." Objective l.l.c states
"When multi-family dwellings are to be located adjacent to single-family
areas, careful considerahon must be given to the density and designs of the
mulriple family development so as to ensure protection of the ameruties of
the single-fanily area." Decision Guideline 1.1 3 for Objectives l.l .b and
l. l.c states that "A multifamily dwelling structure should: a) locate
adjacent designated arterials; b) locate near existing or paarined public
transit routes; c) improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single-
family area amenities."
Goal 1.5 "Encourages a healthful and pleasing environment in the county's
residential areas." Objective 1.5.a states "New residential or multiple-
family developments should be buffered &orn existing a.djacent land uses
where adverse effects inay develop." Decision Guideline 1.5.1 states
"Buffering and/or landscaping will be used to mitigate the differences
between proposed developments and existing uses " Decision Guideline
1 5.2 states "Landscaping may be required to provide a heaJthfiil and
pleasing residential environment "
Half the proposed development is adjacent a prLncipal arterial and half has
aear direct access to the same principal arterial. The proposed
development is near existing public transit facihties and may improve or
maintain fihe consistency of adjacenfi single-family area amenities. The
proposal incorporates landscaping as required per Spokane County Zoning
Code Section 14 806.
The proposed zone reclassification implements the majority of the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban Category of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Arterial Road Plaa: The subject property is located adjacent to
University Road, which is identified by the Spokane County Arterial Road
Plan as a 100 faot Principal Arterial. Implementation of the Arterial Road
Pian requires that tlie applicant set aside 13.5 feet of properly along
University R.oad for a Future Acquisition Areas (FAA) as shown on the
site plaa.
3. County Parlcs Plan: Balfour Park is located less than a mile north of the
subject property and is the Spokane County'Park closest to the site.
C. Site Characteristics: The site is level and has a dilapidated single family
residence and garage on the north east quarter of the subject propErty The
balance of the property is vacant and undeveloped.
D. 1Veigbborhood Characteristics: The subject property is south of and adjacent
to The Gardens at University, a Coramunity Residential Facility. South of and
adjacent to the subject property is a former single family residence converted
into a full service ha.ir salon. Further south and west of the subject property are
all single fa.mily residences. Across University, to ihe east, are single family
residences. Apart from the Community Residential Facility to the nortli of the
6/19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 7
r •
subject property, there are no multi-family residential units in the immediate
vicinity Tlle Spokane Transit Authority University Park and Ride facility is
located 1/2 block north of the subject property.
E. Zoning Analysis• The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone was established to
provide for the orderly development of residential property in a manner that
provides a desirable living environment that is compatible witli surrounding
land uses and assures the protection of property values. It is intended that this
zone be used as an implementation tool for the Urban Comprehensive Plan
Category. The highest density residenual zone, UR-22 is intended primarily for
multiple-family dwellings and is usually located adjacent to major or secondary
arterials. UR-22 zoning exists adjacent to the subject parcel to the north and
across Univeisity Road to the east. The proposed zoning will implement the
Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with existing adjacent zorung.
Proposal • Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58).
North• Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) established in 1991, previously
established as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) in 1962 (22-62).
South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58)
East Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-
22) established in 1991, previously establislied as Agricu.ltural
Suburban (AS) and Residential Office (RO) in 1955 (171-55)
and 1980 (93-80c)
West Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58)
F. Land Use Analysis: The subject property is located on a major north/south
arterial comdor four blocks from a major east-west commercial strip The area
is in a transition area from tradittonal single family residenval uses to more
intense uses
Site Single family residence with a.n accessory structure
North• Conlmunity Residential Facility
South Single family residences and hair salon
East• Single family residences.
VVest Single family residences.
G. Site Plan: The site plan shows the subject property consisting of four parcels
each with a four-plex urut with six parking spaces plus a total of four extra
parking spaces for recreational vehicles. Full implementation of the site plan
(creation of parcel configuration) will reqwre compliance with the Spokane
County Subdivision Ordlnance. The Spolcane County Zoning Code requires one
and a half pazking spaces per dwelling unit Points of ingress and egress are
shown from University Road on the east and Oberlin Road on the west.
Landscaping requirements per Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.806 are
shown adjacent to both roads, the existing UIZ-3.5 zorung to the northwesi and
along the south properry line adjacent to existi.ng UR-3.5 zoning The site plan
does not show the existing sidewalk on University Road nor ihe existing sight
6/ 19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 8
> >
obscuring fence along the north property line. More than adequate buildi.ng
setbacks aze shown on the site plan.
Tlie site plan subnutted for review by the Hearing Examiaer is general in nature.
Detaaled review to deterniine compliance with all Zoning Code regulations and
conditions of approval is recommended to be ad.muiistrahve and to occur prior
to issuance of a Building or Change of Use Permit.
Use: 16 multiple family residences
Proposed buildings: Four
Site Coverage: 18%
Square Footage: 8,400 Square Feet
Building Setbacks Proposed ReQUired
Front yard (University Rd.) 73.5 feet 55 / 25 feet
Front yard (Oberli.n Road) 73.0 feet 55 / 25 feet
Side yard (north) 10 feet 5 feet/story
Side Yard (south) 20 feet 5 feet/story
Rear yard 15 feet 15 feet
Parking 28 spaces 24 spaces
Maximum
Struci~ure Height: 23 feet 50 feet
H. Circulation The property will be accessed from Uruversity Road and Oberlin
Road via the driveways as shown on the site plan. Fire District #1 will need to
approve the proposed access prior to the issuaace of building pernuts
1. Drainage: A drainage plan will be reqtured prior to the issuance of any
building permits. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County
Engineer's Department prior Yo building permits being issued.
J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easemcnts: None known.
K. Water Supply: The proposal is served by the Modern Electric Water
Coinpany. Provtsions for water service are reqwred prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
L. SewAge Disposnl: A public sewer system is available to the site Plans and
specificafiions will be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of any
builrling permits
M. Sebout. The proposal is in the Central Valley School District. No comment has
been received.
N. Fire Protection• The proposa] is within Fire District No. 1. A leiter dated
MarGh 11, 1995 states that the Fire District has no objection to the zone
reclassification.
6/ l 9/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 9
c ~
0. Culrural Resources• None have been identified.
P. Parks nnd Recreation: No comments have been received
Q. Wetlands: No wetlands are shown on the Spohane County Wetlands Inventory
Maps.
III. ENVIRONME NTAI. REVIEW•
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
Division of Bwlding and Planning. The review considered the specifics of the
proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws,
possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, a.nd
other County policies and guidelines. The Division of Building and Planning has
detennined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the
proposal being develaped and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance
("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 13 other agencies of jurisdiction and otlier
agencies/departnents affected by the future development for review and comment
The "DNS" comment period ends June 17, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on thc proposal site. 1'he
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related teshmony at the
public hearuig
IV. DIVISYON OF BUILDING AND PLANNING SUNIIVIARY &
REi COM1VIENIDATION
The proposed Urba.ci Residentia.l-22 (UR-22) zone implements the majority of the
Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban Category of the
Comprehensive Plan The proposed use is consistent with the existing land use and
zoning trends in the neighborhood. The Division of Building and Planning
recommends approval, as conditioned.
V. CONDI7['IONS OF APPROVAL
i. All eondirinns imposed by thc Heariag Examiner shall be binding on the
"ApplicaDt", which terms shall include the owner or owners of t6e
property, hcirs, assigns and successors.
ii. The zone reclASSif cation applies fo the following real property:
That portion of Block 229, OPPORTUNITY, according to plat recorded in
Volume "IC" of Plats, Page 20, in Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows.
Be~inning at a point on the East line of said Tract 386 4 feet Souih of the
NortheRSt corner thereof, and running thence West on a line parallel with the
North line of said Tract, 327 2 feet, more or less, of the West line of said
6/19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 10
i t
Tract: thence South along the West line of said Tract, 64.4 feet; thence East on
a line parallel with the North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet, more or Iess, to the
East line thereof; thence Narth along swd East line, 64.4 feet to the point of
beginning,
And that portion of sald Tract 229 described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of said Tract, 450.8 feet South of the
Northeast corner thereof, and running thence West on a line paxallel with the
North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet more or less to the West line of said Tract;
thence South along the West line of said Tract, 96.6. feet; thence East on a line
parallel witb the North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet, more or less to the East
line thereof; thence North along said East line 96.6 feet to the place of
beginning.
Excepting therefrom that poriion deeded to the County of Spokanc by
Statutory Warranty Deed recorded March l, 1991 under Recording No.
91U30]0051
SPOKANE COUN'I'Y DIVISION OF BUILDIlNG AND PLANNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone and the
Aquifer Sensrtive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept
presented to the Hearing Body. Variations when approved by the Division
Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location
landscape plans and general allowable uses of the perinitted zone. All variabons must
confonn to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the origina.l
intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. The Division of Building and Flanning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Audrtor a Title Notice noting that the property in guestion is subject to a
variety of special conditlons imposed as a result of approval of a land use action.
This Tide Nobce shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting
the Praperty in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Spokane County Division of Building Plarining. The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows:
'rhe parcel of property legally described as [ j is the subject of a land use
action by A Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [
imposing a vAriety of special devclopment conditions. File No. [ J is
available ffoe inspection and copying in the SPokane Couaty Division of Buitding
and P1Anning.
4. Approva.l is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific hghting aad
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
perrnits.
6/ 19/9b Staff Report for ZE- l 7-96 Page 11
• c
5 A spectfic laridscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Division Director/designee shall be submitted witll a
performance bond or ather appropriate security, for the project, pnor to release of
building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight
distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
6. Direct light from any extenor area lig.hting fixture shall not extend over the
property boundary.
7. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
authorized by the State Building Code Act Design/development coacerns include:
Addressing, fi.re apparatUS access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems,
building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classificabon, exiting, exterior
wa11 protection, and "energy code regulations. (Note The Division af Building and
Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building
permit )
Attached are couditions/comments submitted to the file from the following agencies:
Spokane County Health District, dated May 29, 1996
Spokane County Divisioa of Engineering and Roads, dated June 4, 1996
Spokane County Division of Utilities, dated June 11, 1996
Spokane County Division of Development Services, dated June 10, 1996
Spokane County Air'Polluxion Control Authonty, dated .iune 3, 1996
Washington State Department of Ecology, Dated June 12, 1996
Central Valley School District, dated May 29, 1996
6/ 19/96 Staff Regort for ZE-17-96 Page 12
KANE COUNTY HEALT~-I DISTR~., _
REC~IVED
SPOKANE COUN'TY ENVIRONMEN..AL HEAL.TH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
MAY 3 0 1996
ONl810N OF BUILOINO AND PLANIVINCi DATE: MSy 29,1996
BY•
TO: _'L/Ouis Webster, Planner II, Spokane County Buildi.ng and Planning Division
~ RECEIVED
FRO1V1: Donald T. Lyach, EHS II - EHD, SCHD SROKAjyE CpUNTY
SUBJ.ECT: Proposed Zone Change: ZE-17-96 (Katcher) MAY 3 0 9996
DIVlStON OF BUILDINC3 APIp pLANNtNG
1. References: BY: Li
a) Map of subject, by Applicant, dated April 3, 1996, received by tlus office May 28, 1996.
b) Reconnaissance Geolop-ic Map of the West Half of the Sookane Ouadraagle. Washineton and Idaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survev, Snolcane Couatv. Washineton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Sr)okane Countv, QVashinLrion, EnQineerine Interaretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A,
August, 1974.
e) Snokane Countv Ru.les and Regulations for Sewaee Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995.
f) Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sections 17, 19, 20, 21, and 29.
g) Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U S.G.S , 1973, and Spokane N.E., U S.G.S., 1973
2. Findings:
a) Thi.s project lies over the Spokane-Rat}.idrum Aquifer.
b) The project is vvith.in Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within fihe service area of Modem
Electric Water Company. Water supply will be a public systenl.
c) The project is uiside the Spol:ane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
Genera] Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not
of the proper dimensions to pernut the use of both individual wells and sewage systems.
d) 'Ihe project lies in a relatively flat area west of Uruversity and north of Sixth Avenue Local
drainageways are insignificant.
lI
I'mpuosc;c1 %(111L CIll1116C 7E-17-96 (kuLcher) • ~
1'ugr ?
c:) Surface soits are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loam with 0% to
5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight There is also possible
contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classif ed as a Type N.
i) Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very Iarge anlounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section lf shows they are
fYOm 40' to 325' deep and have static water levels vaiying from 25' to 210' below the surface. The
Modem Electric Water Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) A public sewer system will be made avaulable for ihe project and individual service will be provided to
each lot. Use of indlvidual on-site sewage disposal systems shall ❑ot be authorized.
4 Recommended Conditioas of Approval•
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited
c: Director of Utilities, Spokaue County
c Sponsor• David Katcher
810 S. Picrce Rd
Spokane, WA 99206
laadusc itrlkatchu ze-17-96
, - ► ,
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
_ . - ~ONE ANC:F. -
,
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Louis Webster
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard y`U
DATE: June 4, 1996
SUBJ,ECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # ZE-017-96'-/ KATCHER, DAVID
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
Design Review Meeting scheduled March 6, 1995.
Prior to releaee of a building permit or use of property ae praposed:
E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engs.neer.
E43 Applicant ahall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
glans.
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of garking stalls ehall
be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved
by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commiseioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal.
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engzneer.
E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road as a 100 foot Principal
Arterial. The existing raght of way width of 73 feet is not consistent with that
specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recortmlended
that a strip of property 13.5 in width along the Un.iversity Road frontage be set aside
a.n reserve. Thi.s property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Improvements are made to Universxty Road.
E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exiet utilitiea either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set
aeide future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for
adjustmenta or relocation regarding Ghese utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility ia responsible for adjustment or relocation costa and to make arrangementa
for any necessary work.
C: David Katcher, S 810 Pierce, Spokane WA 99206
,i
To: LOUIS WEBSTER, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Spokane County Utilities
Date: 6111/96
SubJect Conditions of Approval
Planning AcBion Number: ZE-0017-96 Type of Action: LP Katcher, David Zone Reciass
Applicant: Kalcher, David Legal Owner. Katcher, David
810 S. Pierce Rd. 810 S. Pierce Rd.
Spokane WA 99206 Spokane WA 99206
Sewer Service:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer
connection permit is required. (See item 12)
SS12 Appiicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Ut,lities Department "under separate covero,
only those plan sheets showing sewer pians and specifications for :(1)Public Sewer Connec#ions
and Facilities (2) s (4)Dry
review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to finalization of the
project and or the issuance of pennit to conneci
(Public Sewer)
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer changes must be made for prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit.
Water Service:
WS01 Any water service for this project shalf be provided In accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
AECEIVED
SROKAhlE CflUNTY
Memorandum JUN 10 1996
OMBtOM OF BUILDINQ AND PLANNIAtG
Date: June 10, 1996
BY:
To: Department of Building and Planning
ATTN: John Pederson, Louis Webster
Froms Development Services (Ed Parry, P.eq)
Subject: ZE17-96 Ratcher Rezone (Apartmente - 512 South University)
Draiaage Concept StuBy Not Required
1. The SCS Soils Survey map indicates that this site is nominally
underlain by soils which are "pre-approved" by the current Guidelines for
Stormwater Management for drywell use, without additional percolation
testing.
2. A Drainage Concept Study is not needed prior to the County Engineer
recommending approval of this land use action at the Hearing Examiner.
It appears that the Sponsor will be able to demonstrate that adequate
infrastructure for stormwater management can be provided, either through
a system that meets the requirements of the current edition of the
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, or through an
alternate system concept acceptable to the County Engineer.
cc : Bill Fiemmings
Pat Harper
SPOKANE COUNTY
_~Q.~.. AIR POIIUTION
f~
llll~~c~ .
QCLE
S P aa-c Ari ffs CONTROI AUTHOR{TY
WEST 1101 COLLEGE, SUITE 403 o SPOKANE. WA 99201 e(509)456-4727 Fax (509) 459-b828
Date: June 3, 1996
To: Louis Webster
Spokane County Building & Planning
From: Mabel Caine
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty
Subject: SCAPCA COMMENTS REGARQING : File No. ZE-17-96 -
Develooment of 16 multiple familv residences - 512 S Universitv
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the environmental documents submitted to our
office. Following is a list of concernsrssues that, at a minimum, need to be addressed for this
project. SCAPCA encourages proponents to contact their offices at 1101 West College,
Spokane, WA 99201 for additional information.
* All air pollution regulations must be met.
~ Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions dunng demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should
be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be control{ed as well
as emissions from all other construction related act+vities.
~ SCAPCA strongly recommends that all travelled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking
areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions.
Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
# Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., vegetative material, construction waste, etc...).
Demolition and renovation projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40, Part
61, Subpart M and SCAPCA Regulation I, Article 1X, which address asbestos abatement
issues. Intent to Demolish forms are available at the SCAPCA offsce.
~ PrintCd An Rer^-lptl {'aper
. , ~
SCAPCA Comments
Page 2
File IVo.ZE-17-96
* Some objectionabie odors will likely resuit from this project. SCAPCA's regulat+ons stete
ihat effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a
minimum.
~ All solid fuei burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must compty with local,
stete, and federal rules and regulations.
Failure to meet SCAPCA reguiations may result in delays, ciosure and civil and/or criminal
sanctions.
~ .
~~57"TepA AECEIVED
o ~ SPOKANE COUNTY
10~1
V"
, ~~o J U N 14 1996
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ONISION OF 13UILDIN(3 ANp pLANNINbl
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLQGY ev
4601 N. Monroe, Suite 202 o Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 ~(509) 456--2926
June 12, 1996
Mr. Louis Webster
Spokane County Division of
Building and Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Dear Mre Webster:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the
determination of nonsignificance for the rezone of property
as proposed by David Katcher. We reviewed the environmental
checklist and have the following comments.
The water purveyor is responsible for ensuring that the
proposed use(s) are within the limitations of its water
rights.
If you have questions, please call Gene Drury in our
Shorelands/Water Resources Program at (509) 456-7661.
Sincerely,
Heidi J. Renz
SEPA Coordinator
jhj r
9603488
. .
; . ;
,
.
Central VaHey
o e ~ioo, DisWd 356
~
Aa ~ual
OppoAuaity £naployer
F.ast 19307 Cawldo
Greenacres,
pg) 922.67MA 99016
Ariay 29, 1996 ~ (S
Louis Webster
Spokane County Planning Department ~)7~~
1026 West Broadway
Sgokane WA 99260
RE: ZE-17-96
Dear Mr. Pederson: ~ r
This is in response to your request for comments regarding ZE-17-96. The development will
be located in the Spokane Valley and will produce sixteen (16) new apartment units.
The Board of Directors of Central Valley School District has adopted a resolution which directs
the adrninistration to take necessary action to mitigate i.rnpacts upon the School District created
by housing developments. The authority for this action is SEPA, RCW 82.02.020 and RCW
58.17.110. Under these statutes, the County, prior to approving a subdivision, must determine
whether adequate provisions exist for public school service.
The Central Valley School Distsict has deterruined that added dwellings envisioned by this
proposal will adversely impact the District's ability to provide adequate student housing. We
ask that Spokane County not approve ZE-17-96 unless the developer and Central Valley School
District agree to voluntary means of mitigating its adverse impact on the Central. Valley School
District. The School. District seeks a fee or other measure which would mitigate the impact by
partially funding cost of space to adequately house students residing in the proposed new
housing. This determination is based on the following:
1. The District's elementary schools are overcrowded. We are currently using portable
facilities. We have need for addidonal classroom space.
2. Enrollment projections indicate that the capacity of our schools to house students will
continue to be exceeded. Enrollment projections are based on a cohort survival madel
which predicts future enrollment based on the past three years' enrollment growth by
grade level.
3. A number of housing developments have been submitted for preliminary plat approval
within the Central Valley School District. Many of these approved developments have
not been completed. Students from these developments will contribute to the
overcrowding of our schools.
.
r '
ZE-17-96
Page -2-
In summary, Central Valley School District asks that Spokane County either deny the presently
proposed ZE-17-96, or approve it with the condition that the developer and Central Valley
School District agree to voluntary fees or other means of mitigation. It should be noted,
however, that said fees provide insufficient funding to support school construction needs.
Thank you for requesting our comments. We crust you will find these comments useful in
assessing the impact of thi.s proposal.
Sincerely,
Dave 7ac an r
Directar
Auxiliary Services
ZE1T.Gty
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- 70NE CfLANGF -
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Louis Webster
F'ROM : Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard
DATE: June 4, 1996
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # ZE-017-96 / KATCHER, DAVID
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
Design Review Meeting scheduled March 6, 1995.
Prior to release of a building permit or uae of property as propoeed:
E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road Systiem shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
pians
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer The desagn, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall
be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved
by the County Engi.neer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
E55 Roadway standarda, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to thia proposal.
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifie9 University Road as a 100 foot Principal
Arterial. The existing rxght of way width of 73 feet is not consistent with that
specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended
that a strip of property 13 5 in width along the University Road frontage be set aside
in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Tmprovements are made to Unxversity Road.
E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities elther underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set
aside future acquiaition Spokane County will assume no Financxal obligation for
adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilitiea and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work
C: David Katcher, S 810 Pierce, Spokane WA 99206
DETER1ViINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANEi COgJN'Y'Y DIVISION OF BUELI)ING ANID Pg.AN1vING
RESPONSIBLE OI'FICIAL, JAME S L. MANS0N, DIRECTOR
WAC 197-11-974 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FYL,E IVUMBER(S): ZE-17-96
DESCRI'TION OT PROPOSAL. Zonz Reclassification from Urban Resideptial-3.5
(UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (tTR-22) for development of 16 multiple family resideaces.
APPLICANT: David Katcher
8 10 South Pierce Road
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 928-0123
LOCA'Y'ION OF PItOPOSAL: Generally located west of and adjacent to University Road,
east of Oberlin Road in the NE '/4 of Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44
EWM
LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DNISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
IDETEIZMINAT'ION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not
bave a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding tbis D1VS mnst be
submitted no later tban 4:00 p.m., June 17,1996, if tbey are inteaded to alter tbe DNS.
All comments should be sent to the contact person tisted below.
By: Louis Webster Title: Pla.nner II
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane Couniy Division of Building aad Planning (MS-A)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
DATE ISSUED: May 24, 1996 SIGNATURE:
CON&O]'IS RF..GARDING IIWIRONVIEVTAL CERNS ARE VVIELCOME AT THE
HEAR1NG
A]PPICA.L, OT THIS I)ETElZMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOK:.ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 2nd Floor,
West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above
project's appeal deadli.ne, being ten (10) calendar clays after the signing of the decision to
approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be
prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Bullding and Planning
to assist you with the specifiGS for a SEPA appeal.
i4ift", 11#~### .
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Depariment of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Health
3. Spokane County Health District
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Autharity
6. Spakane Couaty Parks Department
7. Spakane County Boundary Review Board
8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council
9. WA State Department of Transportation
10. Spokaae Transit Authority
11. Central Valley School District
12. 1Vlodern Water and Electric
13. Fire District No. 1
~ •~~i ~ !
" 1 7 / t
C4*
MlONMENTAL OR:XNANCE
SFOKANE ENV .
SECTEON 11m10m230 -1-
SPOfCA!(E ElNIR?l4Sf1fT1I_ OQDiNAN;E ~n
(yaC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(t) t
Environraental Checktfst
F11e No
Purpose of Chetkllst•
The State fnvironmentol policy Act (5EPA) chepter 43.21C RC11. reQUlres ell gorerronentei egenctes to consl0er the envlronaentel iiaDatts ol o proposal
be/ore,reking Aecisions. An Enrironantal lopect Statemnt (E15) nast be prepared for all proposals ritA proOaDle fignitlcant ndverit icaparts an
the Quality ot the enviroReent. Tht purpose of thts cAeckltst ts to provlde lntormatson to help you and the agency id0nttfy Impacts frw yaur
proposs{ (and to reduce or avoi0 inpetts fram the proposal. ff it can be done) nnd co help tAe eqency detlde rrether an (IS is requlred.
lnstructions Ior Applfcents
ThSs envlronmentat chetkilst asks you to destrlbe saare Oestc tnforosation aba t your praposai. Governoental agencies use thfs checkilst to determine
erhether the environaentel icpatts of your praposel are sfgnlfttent, requtring praflarattan of an E15. An3wes tRe quest{ons brtetly. rith the roost
pretise tintoroattion knv+rn. or give the Dest dzserlDtlon you cen.
'fou aust ananer encA Question acturately end cerefully. te the Qeat of your knorledge tn woyt cases. yau shauld be able to ensaer the questtans
froa your oun ebservations or proSect plena althout the need to hire exoeria. if you reetly do not knoM tl+e anseer. nr if e Questton does not apDlY
to qaur proposal. v►ite •Qo not kaow' or •ftes not apply.' tovlete antvers to tRe quastiont nw aay avold unnecessary Qelays leter
Sone avestions ask apout qovennnantal reguletlons. sucA as rontng. shorellne. and lendmark desi9netions. Anaer these questtons If you can, tt you
have proslems, thr goverRSentel agenctes can esstst Ya .
TfM cAettlist questions aDPiy to ell parts of your praDosal. even 1f yQU oten to do theo over a perto0 ot ttwe or on dtfterent percels of lend
AttacA eny additfonat 1rtloraatton that wItl descrlbe your proposel or 1ts envlronmntai effetta. TAe egency to rhlch yeu su0att this cneckifst ruy
esh you to e:piefn rour ansrefs ar provtde eddltlonal InfoRaetlon reesona0ly reletee to eeterelning tt trtere may oe slgnlf/cant adverse irraatt
Use of tAeekllst Por nanorosett proposals.
Canptete tAts chrcklist for rtonOroject proposels, even tAough pueatlont aar be ensvered •does not ao01r'
IN MDITIOH. cauplete the SUP'PIEHEHTAI SHEET FOR M011PROJEtT ACTt6N5(Part O1
For nonaro3ett actfons, tl+e refcmnces 1n tha cAeckllst to tAe uords •oro}ect.' 'aopllcnrK.' and 'Draplrtr or slte' Snould De read as 'proposal.'
49ra0oser.• and 'e/fecceE geogrephIc area.• res9ectlvely
A. 8AC1(GROU110
1. 'leae of propose0 projett. ff aDDlicaDle , 1. •
2. Raaa of Applicant _DaV M ANb
3. Address end phone number of apDllcant or contact penon C~n/e TI4{ ~,~d ~fl,e ---P
~d 9- 9~ Q/ a► 3
4. Qate thecklist ore0nred Ro - 9&
S. Agencp requesting checkl/st ~"-eZzy P . lJ
6 Proposed tlwing or sthedule (iecludSng pAaslnq. If eppllCaDle) Y' ~
_ hj,2e J .
- - -i~:~
SR r I Sag- P= *P"
-4V 7
'd ~ - 41.' Yt4z
~
7. s Oo you neve sny plant fer Future a6dittons. expnnston. or lurthar attSvlty relate4 to or connecteE with tA1s OroDOSaI7 lf yes. tRplatn.
ijo
b. Oo you oan or Aave opttons an land near0y or adSetent to tA1s Dreposal* If yes, txplaln.
00
en+rlronrental lnton3atton you krtor apait tRat has Deen prepered, or e,ilt ee prepered. dtrectty releted to tA1s DroOOSei
8. list ;uo
N~
. _ .
~ ~ f 9POR,AIZ LFioIHO`y'?~NLAIc ORI~YNANCFe r~
(vAC 197-1I-960) Sectlon 11 1Q 230(1)
A HA+CIGGHD48n (contiaucd)
9 Oo yw tmw vhetlitr appllutio m are peedieg for go+necaaroetni appcovsls af ochet propoaals dlreecly aftecting che prapecty covered trr you•
9roposal' If yea, espLln
da
10 LSec auy goveramenc syacovaia or pecstta thnc vtll be nended for rwr propooai, if fmpvn ~
C~
-57.o N P ~,G1 P c 4"
11 Ltve s brief. eaaplece descrtptloe ot youc propoml. lneluding the pcopooed uees aa0 tloe alse of che prajett and etce -►ere ere eeveral
Quaecloes later ln thls cl+ecrlLat thac nok you to dsecrt0e certala sapacts o[ yout pcopooal Yw do not need co reyeat chooe enewero on this
PaBQ
1. Z
~a.~ ...,c~.7--d } ~Q ~
f.~ CX.A g
2:. loeatiao of tha pcaposa! Ctvt autflc:onc inforaatton tor a peroon co underecand che pcetlse locecton o( rour propoaed pro}ecL, Ineludlnt o
etreet addrees, tt any, nn0 aettion, cownaAlp •nd rangn. lt knam. il a propoaa.l vould occur over a tange ot ates. provtde tht ranga or
boundat:ee o/ the atce(e) ProvlAe a lega2 deserlpcion, site pien. vtctnitq dep, •nd topographic mep, tt rtaaonably avalLple Whtle you
ohould wbolt any plaee reQuiced by the egencp, you sre noc requlred to duplleste nape or deutted plone eubotcced vtth any pernic npplscatton
rtlated to thla eheckllst
Cd ✓eP~
~~o ~o u~n o N ~,-~'~t'+`r' J
oV1 lLD-Ly ex,~;~ G-N~
S~re -e-
17 Does the propooad aetlon l!e wiihin eRe AQu3ter SerulU v ee (/~SA)' -Ae Ceeetdl~ver Servics Aree' Tt+e Pr lyr~ S Sever Servfce Arne" -he
Clcq o[ Spolcsne' (See• Syolune Councp's ~5~► Overlsr tone %t e Eor Soundsries) ~
V0 A. ~„~~p .J e~f /~~t I •
9 ~
-o ae cOMP.e-en eT uMtra.Y;
9. 19m1ROR`SR'.N. CI.~P.`7Z5
£valuution For
Agency Uoc On:y
• AP-n
nGenetal daocr►pcion of the atte (citcLe oae►a tlsc-,~ollShg. Allly, steeQ slepee, oounteinwo.
otTer
b 'trat lo the eteepeat slope oo the site (opp[oslnete percen: olopa)•
r° x . --I~ ,l
c 'lhac genetat :ypeo ot sol1s are found on the olte (tor esaopla. clay, saad, grevel, peat. auckl'
[t you traov the elaaaifLcacioa of agrtcultucsl eolls, apaclir tt+en ac►d noce enr prloe tecnlend
lyn n10-~ }-In n c,) "
d ktr chere ouriaee ladieatioas or htocoey oE unscable aotla Sn the lmaedlete vlciolcv` Tf so,
,".a oe ri be
2
' ~ ~ ~ • . _ SPOKJ►NE EMVti:OMMER*.u GQOtNaZE ;
(tiAt 197-11-9601 Sectlon 11.1b 230(1)
'
8. EMVI&014KEf(TAL ELEMEHTS(contlnued)
Evaluacion For
Aqency Use Only
e Oescrlbe tne Aur9ase, type. and approxtcm te puantities ot eny filling or g►ading praposed
IndScate saurce of flll
T 1 1 1 ~rc~~MP /Y') ebof (.t~
/
f. Covld eroslon oa ur es a result of cleartng. Constructton. or use" if so, generally 6escrtbe.
Id G
q. About ahat percent of tAe slte util be tovercb alth icapervtous surfaces after project construc-
tlon ifor exacipte. asphali or bulldtngsl'
~ •
_ 4,-VI,2 u. V /O !.t eonslrui
w i 1 I :b ~2,2
h ProDOSed meesures to redace or controT eroston. or other impacts te the eartt►, tt eny
• _ ~ ~ ~1.1.1.~~:? ~
niD p
i -
2. AtR
n tlhst cype at ea4sstons to the a1r voutd result frorn tAe proposai (l.e . aust, eutomobtte, odors
indusLNal, woad sankt), durtnq tonstruttfon and .+hen tAe projett 1s compleLe41 It eny.
generally descrfbe end give epp►oxlmate quentltes f1 kna+rn.
ebns4r i►..L`*d U.ST' 4' Q.1.+.JO /'Y7"LI_`P,
te S
b Are therP eny atf-slte sources o/ emisstorts or odor that may ntfect yaur proposel' if sa.
genereliy describe
NO
c. DroDOSed meesures to reduce ar controt emissions or other fcpacts to air, tf any
~2Z
t.
3 WATfR
e. Surfate
(11 is there eny surfate aeter body on or 1n the tmmedlete viclnlty of the stte insludinq'year-
rourt0 and seesona) streams. saltxater. lekes. pvnds, attlands)l if pes. descrlbe type en0
provtde nnmes. If eppropriate, state altiet strtara or river 1t flovs into.
ry Q
(2) tliil the OroSett redulre any anrt orer. In, or odjacent to (within 200 feet) the descrt0ed
Katrrs? If yes. please describe and eRtnM avat1s01e plans.
3
.
• ' ) SF'O~At~ LiiPIRO'~T2li~AIP OB~IHMC"~
(vAC 197-11-960) Section LI•1b 230(1)
D. LNV[BOtilSEfifAl. LLlKElT'S (eaa[ieued)
Evaluatica Foc
Agencq Uoe Oa17
(3) £octnece the aswnt ot Eill and dredge aetesial cAat wuld be ylaeed Ln or renoved ttom che
aurface vncer or veclando nnd lndleace che aces ot cQe aitt cRoc vasld be •ffeeLed lodiaece
cAe owrce of !!11 mceriel
4) A n/ Y°_
(A) Ytll tht proponol reQulra ourtace mcar vitAdcavele or di+eroiotn' Claa s geooral deoetip-
ttoe. pusDooc. and apptosfante quan[lClas. Lt koovn
ij o
(S) Doe• thr propoeal Ile vlchin a 100-qenr [lood ylale! Ci so. aoce lnncinn on cf+e alte pLn
c *n kn1o H)
(4) Ooee the pcopoul tavolve anp disthacgae ot vnata aaterlals co aurlact vecero' IL oo,
doacrlDe the type of vasta aad antlcipaceE volum ot dloelu rge
/V V
b Ground.
(1) Vill gronndvatas De vltt►dravn, or vill vacer be dlscNarged to 6rouadvacer' Gtve genwral
deserlption. purpese. naff epproalaate Quanticiee. tf fenovn
f-j o
(2) UencrlDe vasce mterfai thot vtl: Oe dioehacged lato the grouod troa septLc tank• or ochor
esnitary vsou craacmot tatlllq Daeeribe the general olae ot the sya[en. cM atiaDer of
houaee to be oaeved (1l aQp1leaDle) os tl+e esabet o1 peroons chr aystem(s) ore espscced to
oerve.
N (D
(3) Draeribe anr systcai, ochet ehan chose dealgaes [ot' tha dispoml of osoltary vaste,
lnocalled (or thc purpoee of dieshrrgleg fluids belnv the grouod eurteee (lncludno syecros aucfi
es ct+eae for cM dlepoaw2 ot a[orn vacar or dsaloage lrao lloot dteina). Oaaeribe che cypc of
eyotem. the amount of osterlal to De dtaposed ot clsrough cM eyatea ard che cypee of aaceriels
likely to be diaposed ol (le+eludiag oetetiolo wfiich my aetor tl+e e7acm imdaartaatly tArough
apilio os oa s roeule of titaflghtiag aeti•Lciee)
Na N e-
(L) Vlll any eheaic►le (eopocislly orgnait eolveacs oc patsolaua fuola) Oe etoied to abova-
gsouad or uadorground atorega tsnksT II oo. vlat cypes DnA QWO[SCi00 0[ ancertale vlll be
ocortd'
No
0
. •
• • ~ 9?09AN8 P1:VIB0l+MZIrUL QBDTHAfiCL
(VAC 197-11-960) Seccien 11 ILO 230(1) ~ 1 • • • ~
D. LRVLAOt)MlPfAL ELDCEiTS (eoacinued)
Evalw[Loe Por
(S) Vluc protoctive onoeureo vill be token co laoure cAet lulca or eplllo ot aay checltal• Agenty Uoe Onir
stored or uoed on ette vtll not be olloveE w percolace to grauedvater (ehle lncludee aneouree
to keep chenleala wc of diapooei oyoceae described in 7b(2) eed 3b(3)1
I V
t Vnter Runo(f (lncludina stoso vacer)
(1) Doscribe the oeurce of evnolt (ineluAing store uotes) aed oet'+oe of collection es+d diepoml
!f anr (latludo Quaociclee. 6: haaM). Vhare vtll chlo wcer flovt Vili tAls wo ter Elev tato
other vacee@' If eo. describs
44 .
'Jlll aoy chnn3cals M atared. handled or uoed on the ette !n a loeation vAare • optll or
ieak vtll dreta to euc(ace ot grouadvacoc or to s•toeo vatee dlopeaal oyocm dioeAnrgina co
•uriace or gcoundvater•
Couid vaote astar4als eoter gcound oc •urtace voterot It so. ganecoily deocribe
rl D
, d Aroposad oeasureo co rsduce or coatroi •urEaee. ground. and runotf vater tapaeco. tt an7 (!f
t~ the ptoposed aetloo 1lao v1tAla ths Aoulfer Seasitiva Araa Oe aoyaeially clmr oa ozplamtlom
r relacios to tacllltioe concereing Saetioao 7p(6). ]O(S). aad 3t(3) ot ehto chackllat)
~ PL/l`lTS
a rhec4 or clrele cype of vegecetton foued on clte sfce
J decidueuo trea alder, maple, aopen, other
~ evergreen trer tlr. ceder. plae. other
~ enn,ea
~ Qro.a
~ pasture
csop or aretn
vet soil pLnto, cattail. buttercup. bullrwA. ekumk eabbage. othec
wter planca ecer 1111y, eelgraoe. nlltoil. other
othe[ typee ot vegetetion
S Vhoc klad and aaouat of vegetetion vill be reaoved or elcaredf ~.2 a> elp
P
u~~f► ~ ~ ~lt~.l~5
e Llec threaconed ot eedangered epecie• lanovn co Oe on or neer the eice pj C) !V e
d Fcopooed laadeeapiog. use of mtfva plaate. or otlrer mmureo co preoerae or enhanee vegec&tioe
on ths ette. !f •ny
~ s
CZMW-
s
. • ~ + 5P09CANE ENYtROlMEfRAL~OROINlttICE .
(NAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.Tb.230It1
B. EHYIROKKEFRAL ELE?1E!(TS (conttnued)
Evatuetton ior
Agency U5e Only
5 ANiHA15
n Circle any Oirds an4 anrraels vhich Aave been observed cn or nesr the slte or ere known to Ce an
or near the slte
Dirds hark. heron. eegl songpirds. tAer
cmassals deer, bear, elk. beaver, other _J/O AltA17
fish bess. satraon, trout, herrirtg. sheliflsh. othtr Il?D IU P
otner
b. llst any tAreatened er endangered species kna+n to be o0 or nenr the slte
IJL3 Ne
c 1, the slse part of a,aiqratfon routzl If so, e:D)a1n.
(T00
d Droposed oeesures to oreserve or enhence ri1411fe, tf eny
X,~PNe_
S. ENERGY AND YATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kartds af energy (electric. natural gas. wood stove. soler) vt11 be used to eieet tne
tne cemeteted preject's energy needs7 Ocstribe rhether it vill be used tar heeting. rnenutat-
turing ettLc,,A C._,~ iJ.
~
h kould qour proje R afttct iAe potenttal use of soler energy by e qjacent prooertiesl 1f so,
generaliy Cescribe
/%_^_o1
c Mhat kinds ef enerqy conservot'on feetures are lncluded In the plens of thls praposal? Ltsi
other pro0 SeE neosur?S to reEute or control energy tmoacts. If eny
~
7. EHVIAONMEHTki MEALTI!
a Are tAere nny envlrenmentat health hezerds. including eaposure to toxic chemicais. risk ol tlre
and explasion, spi11. or naznrQQUS deste, tnat touid oaur es n result of tnis propasal7 If so,
describe
A:)C n:) P ~
0) Descrioe spectal ewrgency serwlces that mfght be required
A)0A.i (Z-
6
• • ~ ~ • _ 9POT.AHL tFPI@QRHY.InAL `JaD:AAl1C8 i (
(VAC I97-11-960) Seccioa 11.10 230(1)
B. EHPIitORMZPiAL E[.IDXMNTS (eancimmd)
Cvaluntion Foc
Agaeey Uoa baly
17iVIRDtLKEt1-AL NEALTS (coacioved)
(2) Proposrd aennureo to reduce or coacrol eaviroastental heslch he u rds, if aay
K)O tA--X>c;o1 J%e.A; A-X,4,_~ -JO c) e ~
b Moloe.
(l) ftac t)peo of noLoa exiec fa chs ares vhich nay affect Yous ptojecc Itor nsnnpls tcettlc.
eQuipaeat. operatioo, otDet' _
O3Q.C' ..r
~
(2) Yhac types and IeYefo of aofne wuld be crmtsd bY or •`oacinteE vitA che projeet oa s
ehorc-taco or o lonQ-toto paete (lor esaapla: tca(Ele. eonsccuetion. operacion. otln r)' [adicate
vhac houta aoioe vauld tam [ron the aite
/~S-~" c.~~ ~r~-s~,~ - ~ ►'l2~~
~
Propased neasuza ta cadus: ot coacrol noloe laDects. !I •oy
~l~' '-'5..2.L--4,.
6 . _p
21 ^-.)e)
~
~ .L~'l p1~• ss~ ~ c~ ~ ~ n n.) 5 . ~ tr_.)
a u•ro Arro sHOME.rM usc _
'
s Wh t to the eurrent use oE the otte and adjoeeet properLlao• Ato
~
D Ilao tAe elco Eeeo uaad tor agrlculcure° Lt oo, dooetipe
1J8 + 4Q Q.M-n 6-1 a
c Oostsibs sny stsuctvts• oa the otta
' ✓
~
d. Vtll eny etnstture• be deaoliohedt Il oo. vhlefit
e. Vhot ct►e current :oeiag claoolfieocioe of tM oite4
t trhec ie tho eurrooc empcehansive plan deolgeutioa o[ cM s1teJ
g It appltuDle. vl+ec la c4+a eurenet ohorelie+e ooacer pcogtan desigaecioa ot the site•
rv~ ,
t
h Nao aay perc ef cl+e site been clauiEled eo aa 'eaviromr+ocally oomlciva' orraT If eo.
opecily
Na .
i. Approximstel7 hov mny people vould raelde or voat io tde empleted yroyaec*
iaLia ~ 7
SPQAANL T1iVID0MCERlAL ORDtHAALE
(wAC 197-11-960) Sectloa 11.lO 230(1)
e MvI6t02tMMeL 8JMET;5 (eoacianee)
Evaluatfon Por
1lgency Uoe Oaly
~ Aqyro:imtalp hov au7 poople vauld tR! conplatcd project diopLce• j/V l
ti Peoponed eaaourae to arold oT r uee dieplaemont lopaece. !t ear
~ ~
6
1 Psopoead neaouses to eaeata tAe propoool to compscibla rith exioting and yrojeuad lnnd mae aod
p]ano. if any
C.*-'l.t/L. ..46k.Y.-l~ la..~..[..C.~. ~
~
1;014~ v
9 NOUyIAG
• Appoo:tascely Aov mny unite vould bs proKQed. ii any1 Iod! u co rhathoc high-. aiCdlr . os
lorLmooe houiing
b Appcoslmtelr hov annr uatta, [t any. vould Eo elimloatedf Indlu te vlmttws Aigh-, niddlo-, or
lov-iss=oae houotng
V(r'Yv
c PropaoeA amoure• co reduce or etontrol_ houotng irtpncts, !t nnys
QJOt mGZ.)( 1 m I 2X n~ -
__propose...d ~
10 AESTIIZ-IrICS
a Vhec la the cailesc hnighc of any psopoeed etcutture(e). noc :aeluding ancaemeaT Yhot to tRa
I I(o) propooedd
principnl oxteriot Dullding m cev
oa3 f =F
b uhat vlevo in thr lcedlace vfcialcy vould De altercA or obscruetadf .`1p,
c Propooed aesouteo to teduee or coDtrol aeschetie Lapoeto. it any
OLLM or • 2Y ` . ~ ~ Q~~ ~
-Z4-e J (20~
11. 6IGH' AttD G1.AitE
s 'Ru t type ot lighc os glore vill tM propooel produeet •1hst tfne of doy vauld lt nalaly occur•
JYl
D Could llght or gleta [rco tia iieiohad pro}eec De a aalct) t+acatd or totarfare +ritd •favst
NC)
c Vtuc eslocing ofd-oSce owrceo oi light os glere eey aflacc your prvpoonlt
AJ4Wp ~
d. Propoaed sseoucc• co teduce or eootrol llght and glare lmpaeto. if an)s
N A
8
SmlAn Mt1TI8,Ti![eHTZL (`DTltAN~CB
(VAC 197-11-460) Saetioa f1+10 270(1) ►
8 T11QIRgIMITM MMMttt'S (ecntinood)
Ewluntion f'or
. Agency Uec Oa17
12 &LCiiZA2°IOH
e. uhat deolgnated aod intocmal reereatioml opportuatttes ace !e c!►e laaedlste eeieinitr•
~ ~ ~ 1 ~r ILtiCX ~ ` J v o Q-T,;f of
A _-.C~nna&9
X-0 u,st,
b. Would the ptopooad pro3ecc 4ls93ate any nsiecing ratodtieeal uaao• i[ ao. dastHOe
'ILn
c Propoeed oaaeueeo co reduce oc eonttol iepocee on rnerencioo, loeludiag recraatioosl oppoKuoi-
cieo to be pTOVfde4 by the pro3eet or applieant, !t noy
U1)
P .
r--
13. 8LS"GRIC AND CVLTUML FttESFdYATiO:t
e Aro there apy plaeea ot objecce iletad oe or propooed for eattonol. steto os locsl prnoanre-
cton soglatere kaovn co be on or aeat to the olcet tf oo, ganerall' denerlba.
Itl0
b Generally doreribe •07 landm+rko or evidartee ot 1►letorlc arcAaeologlcal. acleott(!c or culcural
tapa[tenee lmova to De ao or nest to the •!te
No-Ne-
c Propoeed teo to redvice oc cont:ol fapocco. tf orry
~Ib :R/1t75P0ATAT204
s idaatity publie ateoets and htghvaro a4rving c!u ette and daserlee ptoDosed aceeu co the
esieting atteet eyocem Sroroo aite ploos. tf aery
,u
~~TA , ~ Lca c a4ed oiu
, ~ .
U
b Is oite curtensly ~atvsd ~lle cranelt' Lf noc. vhat te the appro:laace dlotence to the
eesrert ce&w!t •topl
1
c. ilov oiny parklaa epaces vould the covplocad projoct Asea? Dor asay rouldtho projmet elidnace`
Lo~
9 Plld~ I ~
uVA1e'
d. wtli the proposal requiro rny nev rooda os streete, ot laaravem eto to a=isting tmds ot sctaets
aot lacludiag drivrtvayst I[ so. gooecally doocsi6e (indicate vAetM r public or privece)
e Vlll the projoct ueo (or oeeur Ra the laasdists rieinicy o!) wacas, toil. or a1r traaoportotlaai
ts .o. Beminlt,,~ «ee
NO
9
~ .
SF~d'RAn ERVIH0.^QAlAI. OB~IItAtiC; !
(LIAt 19T-11-960) Soeclon ll~ltl T70(1) 7 •
,
B. M+JIlW!@KE!*•Ai. ELDSYF!'S (eontinaad)
Cvulwtlon for
AgentT Uoe anly
f Hav eanr vehieulec crips per dor vauld be Seneraccd by the cmplnted projeetl tt lnavo.
ladleate vhen pest vould oceur
g Propoocd neaouras to teduce or c atcol tronepoTtation imaacto. !t aoys
S--riq
1S PgBLIC SEAVLCES
a 'JoulE the projaet reoulc to an lareaoed aead Ior puDlic oar►icee (Los esaQpl4. ilra psotectioo.
polico pcotecslon, henleh cere, ocRoole. ocher)f It oo, ganorclllp dooeiibe.
0
b Proposed aeaaures to trduce or cootrol direct iepaete oa public earviceo. t• any•
16 U'ILlTMS
a le v cu laEle at the oici alacttie cusal, Q vete etuoe~
eee~vic telepA elcory on _ J
oeptie syetem.~
D Describe the utilitle• chet ara ptopoaad !oe the psojoct, tho utiilty prooldleg the cenlcv aed
the ganeral coneceuccloa aetirltito oa the olca or fo the lamdia[e vitlnlty vhlch aight ba
naeded
LO
ha n) ~
C SICtiA:tJKP
t. cl+e understgnns. wess undor the penelcy of perjury chec the ebove reopomeo ara aade tevehfully nad co tho beot of ar knovledge 1 aleo
undntataad tlfat, •lould Shera po aor vl11[ul alosepresencscioo os villful Lct ot tuU dleclooure on or pett, the • en my withdrav enr
dacasainacfon of noneignlllceeee tlsnt !t aigAt lseia ta rellaace upon thlo etmekllot
Qace UYn ir ona c ,-b~) I✓ 4 -r~-7H6,
(Pleaaa Prtat or T7 )
?toponant: edd[osa DV -1xq(,41 11 P-s'ewe ~
(Sigcucu e
Ft,ane D) aa 900KAI16 W A " o6
Person cac9lating tota ~AV `j' ~1'►~crl,~l &AC,~vP t' Dacac
PhOA6 S I 14S- C~ /,-.;L.~ J
ros su►" ase otnT
Stotf mobar(e) tevleving eAeckiloc ~
8aoed on tis.!• •csit teviev of the eavireaaeetal cAeeklist end other pectiaent lnfomatSao. the otoff
A GonclLdas tttiet these ete no proEsble olgnifieant adraree lapaccs and racemando a deceenloacioo of neaaigol[icaoce
B Coacludee thac pcobaple oigni!leoat adveroe enviroamacal lepaeto do eziec [or the cucnot propaaal nad coconaende • nStigaced dater-
0106t10N 6f aoaaignitleaoee vltA eoadltloeso.
C. LoacluQee that tAere art psoboble eignlticsnt adoerse anKe+omeatal ta9ae[o aad ceea=eada e eetarnimtton o[ sigoiiicante
1tLLIF1C m - gTS.QO
10
e~1 ' e~ t Ic
~A ~I~ ry
+
9 o
p,~ ~I rrt
w ~ J' n~ , ~ att ~ ♦ ~ ~ 1 ~
J16{ rta~a
r~ ~ i
r.: . ~
vil-Dv ~ 1111ap~
~ 0 r i ~ ~ /~~~h
w E , N , o,~, .b'~` i . , ►j ~ ~ - ~
A~ r" 4•:~" E~' a ts ~
e~
A1 0 4- a~
• ^ ~wv w ~q~ ' /1
lb
p
a
c
a mL16- ~
s • a~ j' ~~e 0 ~ 1
m f~ ~ rt ez+f ~1 wa so,r We ~
a_
~
0 N•{ p
~w ,.0 :p ~ ' ~ ~ @ ~ ~0.i.~f►~ I~:fd ~ . ~ y ' ~ ,
i
_ /YBi, /62 ti}
:oes....L'- Y ` f I:or,.~~ ' r
Ati..r Br.~t ~e~.+ sr.T w.a a.e~~ I ~ 1Y
toLl ~ .~h
~ Il~.. s~ IS . ♦
. ~ 1 ' R~ a~►ay ~ ~r;a, t~~ ~ ' . \ s~~sr ~ qu ~y ~ ~
\lorN~ f1, pi?K ~ ~ lor 8. ~V C~ar ►~~a ~ i ,
,
~F1J ` • ~ ~ . ~ rt ~t _ , ~ 8y ~ 1S
• ♦ ~ ~ Or~ uy ~mrj~ 7 ~ ~ ; i
t~y
2J' ---~1a'-+~•~s1-r
c,..., A... G".w Aeeq
*%]c ~ ji'
ls
Ro ryr+~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~
' . ~
23' DRJVQWAY ~ I ( ~ w 7j y~ ~ „ ~ •
~
1 S?}J N t ~
ry 6AS6Md+vf ~ I ~Gvr~w A►r~ ~ 1l~S 150 A.tq^~ I i tc
Grr srwT O.r 5O.-1 "'i~
~ . ' ~ ~ '
2 sroo`~ y
~ , .
ot; ~ $or c y }c.r ~ tor D y ►tv . ( ~ ,di ~ ~ ? ? ~ 22 ~ , ~ ` I:If~~ l«a.~• \ . {.w~ l~.~ ; ~
~ 01 c~
~ * . , •srd ~~i a
G - j -'-i~. 1_ J_ • • i I
, _
.
o , ~~0* Sf,btA/! ~ASa~pedj' drrr Zp i.w4 fASrMi~f M• r~r lpi ~,r«L
t 3 ~ ~e. ' i : Ai.. n~se• 'V IIr
. !
.
M0. 0- ■w { /r Me,~I IM~l {a/4ba~ /~f ri~iN ~
Rv
L e9ead ; [A~lscop~d AN. a , 7oss s4ct 2.08 swtm< 4% . . . . zzo w.cti
- toh~awp~d A►*, C. 4394 rt fi; zoe sw.ac m eC-V . xeo c..' F=
P
toT 5I2E5 AjC /(p!y y.fj [*rdsgareJ A... B(D., ..q37g pK 8.cl!„g oe!Oi@ AbW..
~ ~j t .
, LoT Stits 8f~,. ,!l,9lq ~.ft 1~Oeiwws A►eo A,... .~18T8 ~jF G,os, 6W~1~7 ea.eg. A6tA.. 2,
UNIn pe> LeT ..,.Po,,ir rsnPniisogoi Abo, C., 5,978 oplt krKiKf oro~,a~ N~.~►.e1 p►► r-r...6 o.d 1 Au ~o UAVID KAItMr
/Va oP STORY 1WO twrpr~ta~ A&,aa PID „ 6,sU srn (hf r. u..Il Po►p+evol r►. &e1 w/l AY y.r# 8!0 SwTQ qte" R4
Spo~AUa W4 iv~
SPOKANE COUNTY ' , 1• OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATgON
PAR7[' g
A. GENERAL INFORMATIOrT:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: --DQU 1 D ~ T
MAILING ADDRBSS: 610 .Sc (4 -rx Pi P vc C. 14t~
crrY: 3A) K" C sTATE• WA z.EP: q'72 06
PHONE: 92 8 - O I 2 3 (work) SA N'1 e (home)
gF "PLICAIVT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUT'HORIZATIUN
FOR APPI.ICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
I.EGAi. OWNER'S NAME: OAll lD WATc I-I r- K PHONE. -3 zo 1Z 3
MAILIlVG ADDRESS: S o QT N/ 8/0 P*'e d ce- nd
CI'TY: S pD 0,vE STATE: 14-..PA• ZIP. ~ q 2 C3 6
PROJECT/PROPOSAL S I T E AREA (acres or sq. f c ) 1o Z /Q c v e S
.S ~
~Z l~
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLi~ED (acxes or sq. ft.) l2 -f~ I~
~ 2
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PR03ECT/PROPOSAL '95 2-0! ./D 3o y S 2 D!. 1029
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT A.REA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREETADDRESS OFPROPOSAL ./z sdwTl1 44ALI v eg SiTY
F.XI.STING ZONE CLASSIKICATION(S) (DATE ES°I'ABLISHID) u r' 3. S
EXIST7NG USE OF PROPERTY 3 , Ly
PROPOSED ZONING t1 if -z'7
COMPREHENSNE PLAN CATEGORY L1 !Q 3, Z
r
SCHOOL DISTRICT Va/ley Ce,v7',ar L
FIRE DISTRICT O N e
WATER PURVEYOR loOcl -C ai v
PROPOSFD USE OF PROPERTY:
Single Pamly dwelLngs Duplexes Multifamily dwellings ~
Manufarctured homes ( ) Business ( ) Indus[rial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIWOLVIING THIS PROPERTY: NO.&Q
B. LECzALIZONE RECLASSYFICATIOiV l[IiTF()RM#TICDN:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Sl o~ S• L~,/'L~.(
SECT'ION 20 TOWNSHIP P2S N GE L'Iq~
, .
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS:
c7 be.~ 1 ~,n
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD CL111 V- =/(o b'erlVI U7Z9
1
ZONE RECCIrAASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAYE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANN,ED ARTERIAL ) YES NO
NAME(S) QF ARTERIAL ROADS uNI !/Qff5 i r)r ^ O bev L, N rt
r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
t
~ee GZ~tJ~.cJf-n c ~
EXISTIlNC3 ZONE(S) bf 9 3S TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) t4 re 2 2-
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'TION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW)
4::~ec_ 6C-40-G~ro'
_
IP YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR IIVTEREST IN M.
~
WHAT ARE THE CHANGFD CONDTITONS OF TFE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAI{E THIS
PROPOSAL WAR.RANII'ED?
~ ~i -,e
~
WHAT IlViPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON TIHE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES?
~rQ T~ / Ci ri v A~ ~'!t~ /C/
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? &r~S-1~7LN Ln.J
'7
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO NIITIGAT'E YOUR PR4POSAL'S IlviPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE?
rcC~ ~
' ~ S ~ \Oe- IJU~ -r_T
y ~ eu
Y
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATTON Page 3 of 4
PART BI
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WIILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRiTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIlVIIlVA.RY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATIDN SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROFOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TlJ THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
I'IRE MARSH(ALL/FIRE DLSTRICI'
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PRO'I`ECTION DISTRICT NO. f
B. A.DEQUATE A►RRANGEMBNTS (gIAVE) ~r4Og) BEEN MADE TO MEE'' OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER(~Y~ ~'ENL ANUFACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES. c
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFII~TITNE; AND WILL BE DFTERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION T1MB. /
D. REQ S INCLUDE:
VAu-)ej~;r 2•i~ 6
v
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNA DATE
,
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY A►ItRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUfIRFMENTS (OWM) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. .
s . REQUaREivErrrrsrcoMMErrTs.
ll~le~
WATER DISTRIGT _ SIGIVA DA
COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIlViINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A COMNiENTS:
~ r
Z
IGNA E DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TA►KEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREIViENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) YE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. T'HE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR 1'HIS SITE jS ~/,v h• L..`
A. COMMENTS: ~oO r C, Al{
.
6,/,J, L ~U /J_jO
SIGNA E DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PREL.IMIlNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKLN P AND G RAL REQUMEMENTS FOR
SUBNIITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL ( (HAVE rdOT BEEN SATISFIED.
A COMIViENTS: pv-~
a~-
~ -13'9
e115 CL `SIGIIATURFJTTTLE DATE
- - SEWER PUItVEYOR
A PRELIlViNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQ S FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD Y THE APPLICANT.
A 40-3 /".oy qLc.~id.~irl
A. C~~~MENT$: rN1c ~ 4,
LG~ -
-Z /9
SIGNA DATE
~
1
~ • A Y
♦ • ' '
' •
ZONE RECZASSIFICATION APFLYCATION Page 4 of 4
• 1
PA~T III
SUttVEYOR VERIFICATTON • ~
~
I, THE UNDBRSIGNED, A LICENSBD LAND _SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLfiTED THE r 'REQUESTED FOR T'HE ZONING MAP AND WRffTEN LEC3AL DESCRIP'TION.
Q 29279
+ ~+~~eUATE- d
SIGNED: f
ADDRESS: 7-~%/Rolw ~wfAr-O PHONE•
ZIP:
. -
p'AR'T 1V
(SIGNA'MJRL OF PROPERI'Y OWNERS 0R LB7'IZi OF AUTHORIZATTON)
,
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PBRJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE 11RADB TRUTI3F[JLLY AND TO THB BP„ST OF Mlf' ICfi10WLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWSAR OR AFFTRM 'rFIAT I AM 'T'M OWNBR OF RECbRD OF THB AREA PROpOSE.b
FOR 1'HE PREVIOUSLY IDFNTMBD LAND USE ACTTfSN, OR, IF N'OT THE OWNER, A'TTACHED
HfiREWTI'H IS WRM7EN PERMISSrON FROM'I'HB OWNER AU`fHORIZfNG MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BLHALP. '
,
NAME: DAT'E: G f 7Po
~
ADDRESS: 1 Q .50 v c-v I~ i PHONE• g►' O 1Z 3 .
S P6 /<4 VF ~ WA. ztp:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE DATB
..i r _ . _ - . . - . r . .
STATB OF WASHWGTON }
) ss.
COUNTY OP SPOXANE )
SIC3NED AND SWURN OR AFPIRI1riED BEFORB MB ON THIS DAY OF
1996, BY
,
~
r
KYLE R. MCKEOb ` Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
STATE OF WASHINGTON Residing at-
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Comm"on Expjres 8•lp.n My appointment expires: 1~ °99
,
PART d
(TO BE CdA/IPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF $UILDWO AIVD PI~ANNI,NC3) r
nATP, sUBMIT"MD: ~ MLE .
DATE ACCEPM BY:
TO'TAL FEES: , RE , , ,
~ -1
1'
♦ ~
~ S
OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- ZONE CHANCF -
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Lorne Lakshas
FROM: Divisian of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard Sc-,
DATE: March 6, 1996
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # DRE=176-96 / KATCHER, DAVID
The following "Conditzons of Approval" for the abovz referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane Gounty Planning Department for inclusion in the
Design Review Meeting scheduled March 6, 1995.
Prioz to release of a building permit or use of praperty as proposed:
E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Eizgineer drainage a.nd access
plans.
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and apgroved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall
be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfaczng as approved
by the County Engineer caill be required for any portion of the project whicr is to be '
occupied or traveled by vehicles
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissior_ers ?-esolutiion 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal.
E58 No coastruccion work is to be performed within the existing or proposed raght of way
untal a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the pub?ic road
right of cvay is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
E51 The County Arterial Road plan ident?fies University Road as a 100 £oot Principal
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 73 feet is not consistent with that
specified in The Plan. In order to Ymplement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended
that a strip oE property 13.5 i.n width along the Unzversity Road frontage be set aside
in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
jlmprovements are made to University Road
E90 The applicant should be advased that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedzcated or set
aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligataon for
adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applica.ble utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applica.nt
or utility is responsible for ad3ustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work.
SPECIAL CONDITION: Prior to release of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate
that adeqaate site distance exists at the location for the driveway approaches to the
public road
?6) eew&woq'% Argeoutre
S P O K. N NIF, . C O U N T Y
~EMED
DEPARTMEA'T OF BUII.DING AND PLAiVN1NG • A DtviStoN oF'rtiE Pusuc Wottxs DEPAtt~~rT
J amEs L MANsoN, C B O, DtltECro[t DENNis M. Sca-rT• P E--nmx
1996
Cau~ E~neerin~
MFIVIORANDUM
TO: Pat HarperT Spokane County Division of Engineering
J►m Red, Spokane Counry Utilities Deparlment
Steve Holderby, Spokanc County Health District
Wyn Barkenthal, ~Spokane Councy Parks & Recieation Departmeni
, ~
Greg Figg, Depiu-tment of T ansporfata4n
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authorlty -
Susan Winchell, Boundlry Revtew Board
Central Valley School Distnct
Mociern Electric Water District
Fuc District No. 1
~
rROM: John Pcderson, Senior Pl~inner~
DATF: Februar}► 23, 1996
~
ItE: Zone Reclassilicaiion from Ucban Resiclential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Ur-ban
Residential-22 (UR-22)
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEVW IVIEETING
ilZARCH 1996 AT 1:15
COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND TLOUR
Please review the above applicaUon and use Ihe atlaclied APPLICAT[ON ACCEPTAIVCL AIVD
DES[GN REVIFW MEET.ING FORM foc your commenls. The Planning Departmeilt
encourages your presecice at thss meeting. The spansor and represenrative have been
invited to also attend if you can not auend, please forwarcl your review conunentt on the
atlached form to Lorne Lakshas for Lhe meeting. The attachecl APPLICA'riON
ACCEP'I'ANCE AND DESIGN RCVICw FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meecing anc]
included ul the Planning Departilient file (so bring three copies lo the meeling) Thanks
for your cooperation If you have any questions about the application. please contact
Lorne Lakshas of thc Planning Department at 456-2205
c. David Katcher, 810 South Pierce Road, Spokane, WA 99206
Attachmen(s: Application AcceptUnce and Design Review Fonn, Project Design, Site I'tan
1026 WE57 BROADWAY AVENUE • SI'OKANE, VVASNII`GToN 99260
Bu[LoING PHO,vE (509) 456-3675 • Ftuc (509) 456-4703
P1,aNVtNG PrtoNE (509) 456-2205 • PAx (509) 456-2243
PAGE 1 08:44:31 27 FEB 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05012 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00.000 DISH:MAN-MICA RD & SC U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY RD 00.030 35TH AV (S'I'ART) U 14 PAVED 54
00.130 33RD AV (START) & RA U 14 PAVED 54
00.220 32ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.280 31ST AV U 14 PAVED 54 00.340 30TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.390 RAYMOND CL (END) U 14 PAVED 54
00.400 2 9 T-H AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
00.470 28TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.530 27TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.590 26TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.650 2 5 TH AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
00.720 2 4 TH AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
00.780 2 3 RD AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
00.840 2 2 ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.920 21ST AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.970 20TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.030 19TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.090 18 TH AV (START ) t3 14 PAVED 54
01.220 16TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.280 15TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.290 15 TH -AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.350 14TH AV (E1~TD) U 14 PANTED 54
01.420 13 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.470 12TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.520 11TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.580 10 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.600 lOTH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.660 9TH AV U 14 PAVE D 54
01.740 8TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.780 7TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.820 6 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.840 6TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.980 4TH AV U-14 PAVED 54
02.060 3RD AVE (START) U 14 PAVED 54
02.230 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 52
02.300 RIVERSIDE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 52
02.360 MAIN AV U 14 PAVED 52
02.480 VALLEYWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.6,30 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 14 PAVED 20
02.650 SPRINGFIELD AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
02.730 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.980 BOONE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.020 SHARP AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20 ~
03.070 S INTO ~~V ( ElVD ) U 14 PAVED 20
03.130 MAXWELL AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.140 MAXWELL AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03.240 MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 20
03.310 AUGUSTA AV & CT (STA U 19 GRAVEL 22
03.370 NOR.A AV ( START ) U 19 PAVED 32
UNIVERS ITY RD ( END ) 03.390 NORTH END,OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
05013 UNIVERSI'FY RD (START 00.000 SOUTH END TO MONTGOM U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD 00.170 MONTGOMERY DR U 16 PAVED 20
00.300 BUCKEYE AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20
00.370 GRACE AV (START) U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD (END) 00.440 FAIRVIEW AVE (START) U 16 PAVED 20
PAGE 2 08:44:33 27 FEB 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
UNIVERSITY RD 00.510 SR 290
05023 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00.000 44TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
IINIVERSITY RD 00.060 DARCY DRIVE (START) U 19 PAVED 40
00.210 PONDRA DR (END) U 19 PAVED 40
3 Records Processed
,
i
PAGE 1 08:45:13 27 FEB 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
03505 OBERLIN RD (START) 00.000 CHINOOK RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
OBERLIN RD 00.150 16TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.210 15TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.270 14TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.340 13TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.440 11TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.510 lOTH AV U 19 PAVED 32
00.580 9TH AV U 19 PAVED 32
OBERL I IV RD ( END ) 00.650 8 TH AV U/ 9 PAVED 32
03508 OBERLIN RD (START) 00.000 DEAN AV U 19 PAVED 40
OBERLIN RD 00.060 DESMET AV (END) U 19, PAVED 40 00.120 BALFOUR CT (EN7) U 19 PAVED 40 OBERLIN RD (END) 00.180 SHARP AV U 19 PAVED 40
03504 OBERLIN RD (START) 00.000 31ST AV U 19 PAVED 40
OBERLIN RD (END) 00.100 RAYMOND CL U 19 PAVED 40
03506 OBERLIN RD (START) 00.000 6TH AV U 19 PAVED 36
OBERLIN RD ( END ) 00.050 5TH AV ( END ) U 19 PAVED 36
0 3 5 0 7 OBERLIIv RD ( START ) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
OBERLIN R.D ( END ) 00.0150 DEAN AV U 19 PAVED 40
0 3 5 0 9 OBERLIN RD ( START ) 00.000 SI-iARP AV U-19 PAV'ED 40
OBERLIN RD (END) 00.070 SINTO AV
03510 OBERL IN RD ( START ) 00.000 MAXWELL AV ( START ) U 19 PA`IED 40
OBERLIN RD (END) 00.090 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 40
03528 OBERLIN RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
OBERL IN RD ( END ) 00.070 MONTGOMEERY DR U 19 PAVED 32
8 Records Processed
,
Tra f f i c Coun t s" '
Road Name Location.................... Leg Count...
4 TH AV a t CARNAHAN RD ( END ) E 1847
4TH AV at CARNAHAN RD (END) W 01021
4TH AV at EASTERN RD E 737 4TH AV at EASTERN RD W 2258
4TH ASI 160 f t W a f COLEMAN RD E 0 0 5 0 2
4 TH AV 160 f t W o f COLEMAN RD W 0 0 3 3 5
4TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 0?849
4TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 02977
41H AV at BOWDISH RD E 02683
4TH AV at BOWDISH RI) W 02309
4TH AV at SR 27 (PINES) E 2541
4TN AV at SR 27 (PINES) W 1858
4 TH AV a t MCDONAL,D RD E 1941
4TH AV at MCDONALD RD W 1903
4TH AV at EVERGREEN RD E 1766
4TH AV at EVERGREEN RD W 2083
4TH AV at ADAMS RD E 2560'
4TH AV at ADAMS RD W 2695
4TH AV at SULLIVAN RD E 3063
4TH AV at SULLIVAN RD W 1656
4 TH AV ( END ) a t FARR RD ( START ) E 01432
4TH-AV (START) at DISHMAN-MICA RD E 1841
4 TH AV ( START ) at FARR R.D E 2281
~ ~ rf S
S N t-4 p- (D u r.T -r ~
DEPARTMENT OF BIJtLDING AND T'LA.'*:NI.'~G * A T3nis9Q.N OF'€+tE PUBLIC WOM DT.I'ARTMIIVT
JAmEs L MAN5ON, C_B 0, DIRECTQR 1]ENN[5 A+I SCoTT. PE. WtEftED
'1.°~J96
~1llCIV1ORA1~nUI~T F
~~~ir~eerlc~
ri O: F~~aWAaqxe~y" a.arpok~~1+T~~~~~~`~t'~~~~4l~~~~II
Jiiiz Red, Spokane County Uiilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Heal[h Dlstrict
Wyn Birkentha.l, Spokane County ParkS & Recreation Dep2u`Etnent
Bill 1Hemtrungs, Stormwater Utility
Gicb Figg, Departrnent of Ti ansportation
Glen Mi1es, SpQkane Regional TransporEation Council
Christine Fuestnn, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Bnund~t-y Review Board
Central Va11ey School Distnct
Modern Electnc Wa[er Dist-iCt
Fire Disti-ict Na 1
FROIVI: 3ohn FedersonF Seniar Planner ~
~
A
I3rdi,'TE; FebE-tiary 23. 1996 u
RE: Zone Reclassiiic;ation frorn LIrban Refiidentaal-3 5(UR-3 5) to Uibm1
Residentiai-22 (U'R_22)
APPLYCATION AC'CEl'TANGE AItiTII I3ESIGN REVIEW MEiETING
MARCH G. 1996 AT 1:15
\.-rOUll l i iLA3■17I1\li CL/~FEllEY•LolJ L`OV1■.i.a 2ND 1'LL7tf11
picase review 1he ahove application and use the aLtaehed APPLiC;ATION ACCE,PTANCE AND
DESIC'iN ~EVTEW MFF-MNC'i FORM for yoLir cnr11n]t'.trts The Flanning Depa.rrnlen[
encdtarages you-r piesence at this meeting The sPonsor and rcpresentauve liave been
inviced to also atti:nd If yoti can not attend, plzase torward YaLar reWicw cornmenrs on the
:attached farm co Lorne Lakshas for the meetang. The a[lached APPLICATjON
ACGEPTANCE ANb DESIGN RE'V~NIV FC3RMS wlll be given to lhe sponsc7r ai the meeling and
iiiGluded tn the Planning Department file (so bringthree copies to the meeting) Thanks
for your cooperatzon_ If you have any quesuons about the applicauan. please eonCact
Lorne Lakshas oI' the Planning Department at 456-2205
c David Katchei, g 10 South Pterc:e Raad, Spakane, W.A, 99206
Attachtnent~►, Applic.atiun Ac.ccpEanc.e and Q4stan Rev,ew Form. i'rr~ject Design. Sice Plari
1026 W£ST LfRC3ADm1Y AvEhll:F • SPC7ECANEr WP►SHiNGTCJIti 99260
ButLDn•rG 1'HONE (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
P.ANNTiNIG PHaNE (509) 456-2205 • Fax (509) 456-2243
I
.
•4 • "
Design Review for March 6, 1996 at 1:15
Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22)
Generally located west of and adjacent to University Road, east of and
adjacent to Oberlin Road/Sth Avenue, in che NE 1/4 of Section 20,
Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENStVE PLAN• Uiban and wathin the Pnoriry Sewer Service
Area (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification From Urban Residenual-3 5
(UR-3.5) to Urban Resldential-22 (UR-22) for 24 multlple family cesadences
and those uses allowed, in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
PARCEL NUMBER. 45201 1029, 1030
SITE SIZE• Approximately 1.2 acres
APPLICANT David Katcher
810 South Pierce Road
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 928-0l 23
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Lorne Lakshas
.
- SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION 0-7
BUILDING AND PLANN~NG
ZONE RECLASSIFICA~~ON APPLICATgON
PAItT I
A. GENEIiAL INFORIVIATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE• -QAU 1 D 6 cT
MAILING ADDRESS: ~ r o s~ ~ rx ~f P yc G
CITY: -5rO {CA11T STAT'E• !/JA ZIP. C?q2 06
PHONE: 92 8 - o J 2-s (work) sA Ole.= (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AiJTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME. DAU I Q brA C C- PHONE: O I Z 3
~
MAII.ING ADDRESS: S octT f-1 $/D P,'e ` c P ~o1
CITY: SioD KA A/E STATE: 14.1A. ZIP• 1? 126
G
PROJECT/PROPOSAL STI'E AREA (acrzs or sq. ft) / o47 ~ c v eS
ADJACFIVT AREA OWNBD OR COIVTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) U 9 3, 5 !(4 fe 2 Z
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECf/PROPOSAL 'I..5 201. lO 3o y 5 2 O/. !D 29
ASSESSOR PARGEL #'S OF ADJACBNT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL .Z s oc4T 11 G(pl i/ ed s i ry
, EXIS'TIlNG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DA7E ESTABLISHED) LO es 3. S
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY
,
PROPOSED ZONING Li W 1Z
COMPR.EHENSIVfi PLAN CATEGORY Lt IQ 3 ,5
I SCHOOL DISTRICT va lleY Ce,v7',ov L
FIRE DISTRICT o N e
WATER PURVEYOR klOdf sr A-A
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY•
Single family dwelLngs Duplexes Multifamily dwelLngs ~
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industnal ( ) IvLxedUse ( )
Other ( ) - I?escnbe: '
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNllVG DEPARZ`NiENT AC'TIONS IlWOLVING THIS PROPERTY /f/o.v,e
B. I.EGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN INFOitMATION:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SI oZ S- .
SECTION ~0 TOWNSHIP ~5 N
GE
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACGESS. 0 L v,~~'~ • ~
0 b%e. r ) Ln
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONT'ING ON PUBLIC ROAD. U1)I V- = 16 I J~ , 0 b'el"( C/J Q~,7~•9
.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATI~.. APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTE?RIAL ) YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS u~t// 1/PI?Si'A~ L„~. r~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
t
~ec
EXISTING ZONE(S) 2 3•S TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ uf;C 2 2-
FOR THE FOLLOWIING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW,
4~~ e e_
,
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
~'_L(aajjJG Qj3 -PjZo
WHAT ARE 1'HE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHIGH YOU FEEL MRKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED?
~
WHAT IMPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERT'IES?
-era Ar/ col ~ ` dd.&A o d
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLAS SIFICATION?
TT~
LtjQ, `7 4' Lt le- alc;t
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPaSAL'S IlviPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE?
a • (l _ '
A-10 \Ae t4~ 1--~ ,
. ~
~
. '
Z4NE RECT.ASSIFICATIv~4 APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THI.S SECTION OF T'HE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRTTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIlVIINARY CONSULTATION WI1'H THE
AGENGIES IDBNiTiFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIlViIlVARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPOR.ATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SCTBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALLIFIRE DISTRICT
A. THTS PROPOSAL IS 1N1THIN FTRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO l
B ADEQUAT'E ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) ( ~NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS'
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER ~X FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURP4SES.
C. RECOMMMNDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIYE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TINtE.
D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE•
FIRF DISTRICT ~ SIGNATURFII'ITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY A►RRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIIlZEMENTS (HRIM) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. •
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: O)atk )9AZ4,~~ '~ylv'- - A"..-e .
~.s..~. 24. edo. . aw cailly V46
WiiA~iE
WATER DISTRICT SIGNA E 4~ DA -
COUNTY ENGllVEER
A PRELMIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PI.ACE AND GBNERAL REQUIItEMENTS FOR ROADS
E1ND DRAiNAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A CO1vIIviENTS
i4iGNA RE Ef DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES
* PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEIV PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) VE NOT)4BE N SATISFIEI7. THE DESIGIVATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS r--'/a 40--
A COMMENTS: aQ ~ C, ~,s-~~c l Y
. Z f 3 lS ~
SIGNAT'URE/I'ITLE DATE ~
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAQE AND GE?QRRAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL ( tHAVE NOT BEEN SATISFIED.
A coNrNtErrrs:
.1• / 3
e115 2Z- 'SIGI*AT'URF1Y'ITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRLLUvrIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISI4N OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD Y THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: rN-LeI ~f7 •~°a✓ r ..~iJ &1.4 P/.SCwPI /Qi'S l,r ,o-eV.fiv~ljj
~
J ~l
. ~ Lk -
~ SIGNATURE/T'ITLE DATE
. .
- r -
t • Z.ONE RECL,ASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART IIl G l~r ; 1 r
SURVEYOR VERIFICATTON
, ~ » .r. I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE
REQUESTED FOR THE ?ANIlVG MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAI. DESCRIP I`ION
29279 s' :
SIGNED~ 0+0 .
DATE.
y ADDRESS:.,.•tTV1 IF40"eBr ¢'AW- PHONE: ~xar~sn~o~~
246 ZIp•
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERNRY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A►FFIRM THAT I AM TBE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE A12EA PROPOSED
FOR TFE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACI'ION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHHD
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM T'HE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACfiIONS ON HIS/HER
BBHALF.
NAME: DATE:
ADDRESS: PHONE.
ZIP.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESEN'I'ATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR A►FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
, 1996, BY
NOTARY SEAL
Notary PubLc iu and for the State of Wastungton
ResicLng at-
My appolntment expues:
PAItT V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DMSION OF BUII.,DING AND PLANNllNG)
DATE SUBNIITTID: FILE
DATE ACCEPTED. BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
r
J
♦ I , SPOKANE COUNTY DTVISION 07
3UILDING AND ?LANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFIcCATION APPLgCATION
PART I
A. GENEItAL INFOItIVIE1TION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE• _DAU 1 D 6 6TC 6tv
MAII.ING ADDRESS: 910 Sc q'r1-{ P, . 1?4
CITY: -5PD KA11T STATE IVA ZYP• R'y 2 v 6
PHONE: 512 8 - o 1'L 3 (work) S A of t' (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNEIt, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME. PHONE.
MAII.INCi ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft)
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PR07ECT/PROPOSAL
~
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACEIVT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL lj'~ z SC' N T ll 14$! I U e6 s i
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLTSHED) N/f 3. S
EXISTING USB OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED ZONIlVG
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOL DISTRIC'T
FTRfi DISTRICT
WATER PURVEYOR
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY•
Single fumily dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( } Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PItEVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIWOLVIlNG THIS PROPERTY:
B . LEGAUZONE itECLASSIFICATION INF0ItMA1'ION:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGB
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS.
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD•
~
. , _ `
R r Y
ZONE REC'LASSIFICATION A.PPLICATION Page 3 of 4
,
.
,
~
PAR'T II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE TEiE PLANNING DPPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTAZ`ION WITH THE
~ AGE,NCIES IDENICIETED. RESULTS OF THB PRELIMINARY CONSUL'I'ATION SHAL.L BE INCORPORATED
s IN THE PROPOSAL BEr-ORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,
~ FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRIC'Y' '
;
~ A. THIS PROPOSAL IS NVITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO
' B. ADEQUATL AR.RANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO hiEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
' PROTECTION PURPOSES
; C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULAT'E NOW
BECAUSE USE IS N4T DEFINITIVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINfiD AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME '
' D . REQUIREMEN'TS INCLUDE
FIRB DISTRICT SIGNATURFJTITLE DATE
Q
WATER PURVEYOR '
~ A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMEN'I'S FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIR:EMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS.
;
;
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURFJI'ITI.B DATE
COUNTY EIVGINCER '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAIIYAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A COMMENTS .
. ~ 1 ~
~ ~ ~?J' ~I Ct
IGNA E DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
° SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE IYOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS
A. COMNiENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DA'I'E
HEALTH DISTRICT '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAICEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURFITITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR ~
A PRELIMIlVA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PGACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A . COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
t
~
'ERMIT CENTER,PA.SS.PORT
Date Number
Name Phone
~A-Q j ,
Address
Comments _ - - -
CUSTOMER ROUTiNG
BUII.DiNG Department PUINNING Department ENGINEER'S Depanment ~
~ Addressing Ac1mm. I:xccptinn Arpraach Pcrniit
~ I3uilding Pcrniit Artenal [td 1'1an Info , I•load Plam Ycmiit
Code Inforniation 13inding Sitc I'lan Infn Publtc/I'nvatc Roacl.s
~Commerci71 Review _ Cert vCL'•xemption Ites I31dg Perniit Rev.
= CcmCerence R Cnniprehensn=e Plan Sitc Drain3gc Info
~ I?nerp► Cade InPo Cond Use 1'erniit Suladivision Review
= Fire Safety Review ~ Nunconfarnung Usc , Utility Permit
Manufactured Ilome Pernijt Review Zonc C7ian6e Review
~ I~Seeltani~l I'ern»ts ~ Shorclines Info _ g q c, ~ U~o 7
- - w - - .
Otiicr I'cniiits Shart Plat lnfa NO TFI: RE'QUI12L17
~Reviewer , lime nut
1'IumUuigl'crniite ~ Sutxlivision Icifo
.
~ 1'rivate Rond lnfo : Ternp Use Pern»t ~ -19TILITIES Department p
~ Residential Review i Vanance Alip1 _ APA Payrnent
Scwer Perniits 7,anc C9ieck Ccrt af racmption
Zanc Info Suhclivision Review
ULII),ISc%cr Info
?.onc C1»ngc Review
NO •:l: REQUII2LD N0 Tf:ls REQUIRL'D
Rcvicwcr Timc out Itcvicwcr 7ime out Rcvicwer "Limc out
MASTLRIPASSMRI CiR ?/IlV93 's
. ,
` RECETPT StJMMARY -
TRANSACTTON N[1MBER: T9600229 DATE: 02/13/96
APPLICANT: DAVID KATCHER PHONE=
ADDRESS: 810 S PIERCE RD
SPOKANe WA 99206
CONTACT NAME: DAVID KATCHER PHONE=
TRAN3ACTION: PRELIM ZONE CHADTGE 3IGN-OE'FS (ENGR & UTIL )
DOCUMENIT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS: FOR PARCEL #95201.1029
FEE & PAYMENT SUNMARY
ITE.M DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAY1D USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAL DUE = 220.00
TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CKECK# PAYNIENT AMOUNT
02/13/96 00000910 1414 220.00
PROCESSED BY: KATHY C[JNIIrIINGS
PRINTED BY : KATHY CUAMING3
*~~~►~**#*►~~,r*~*~►~r~**~*~*~***,r* THANK YOU +**~.~+►~r►~*r.****,►~~*~~~~~**,r*e~#,►*~*~
r
i . ZN ~.4'7=96
i ~ ' ' ' , S - ~ g • e
. . •
1 t
~
ALK I
0 0 ~ Q - ~ -~•R,•
Q a ~n
AkOs~ 0
cc
/0 L L V ~
a- Pd 1 Ago!~
! o j a ~ c MA~ N ~
' MAipd
~ ~ a M 11d AVE r q
~ J J p ~ ~
6t $ ~ ~
-
I O ~ ' , B tvzROlOz 4=
~ a ~ Fire
= tQ4iea+ _ _ ~ 5P .XU►~ ' in DEt./9.93
, - - , ~ ~ ~ , ,
~ S K COVNTY • ROA-D - N°- 2 3120
~
62
I ~0 ~ • AVF.
} ' a
.St Pt AaffR Cotve MILWAUKEE RA/[ROAD
. ,
I ..Lw.Z.e*.. ~
O
I FOVRT♦+ AVE OURTH l~►V
_I
~ ir
W V m K
C _ OC 0 O ~
f1+ ~ • Q
Z w
' N
5
~ •
Q 4 h
1
(A
~ TTa+ SEVENTfO '
J , !
~I
esvE ~ e T N T s~ E 1 G E+T H AY
O ~ Z e ~
. • ~
9 TH 9~
. . . . _ ~ ,
i1 • ~ . , i'
t0 IOT ;Q'; Y. ;
~ o .
3:
• ~ - 1 I TN ,
I~ ~ ' ~ TN I
. ~
J i' ~~~'i '41~ t)PQOP11t~IRY
g P's1 SC"W ~
~ Fo a ;`•~'r ; ~ r . .s. ~ ~ i
'a
o o ~
sr
;
. . • -
• /L~ T
i
~ ~ ~ • v
-rw
\ • - ~
Iiri= p
~ 'a ~ ei~ , ~~a' ~ i S 1 f
A/ ~ ,..i, ~ ' • ~
A►i^^
0fflo, 91irz Y ~.r ~~~w r♦ n... i~ ^r
~(l~~'
` g~~ -^4p- + ~ Mtl
0.0r46 IsI
W E i~'_~..&'_'~I.' !
,
`A~ ~1--. 'a 4"a
0 O:e ~
_ IAi
0 r
Fol-s i. „
_c oleeu" •o ~ l
j
e e ~ o e
n A Zj,
0
e,.~l ~L
' - • ~•IY et'~~°I'i~~1~4~ rr r~.S,'~
I 40~ kr< 1 ~ I
1c / =1
•yrl ro*la I v IV
( , • ~ ~
IS
Rv ~TwA STo~Y~ ~ , ~u s~atr 7 - - - - ~ i
\ ~ ~ Rut r~.~, ~
p!!q ~ !oT 9 4 pt.s ►ira ~ i
iao If pr 'ss As"
1u1J.' ~..u.~~ /.~1ql,y. I • ~ l~l8iof ~ ~ .i
SJ IaK
d h ~e ILs
w I~ ~ pwo flarT ► Dau~o 1~~1 -vj1„~
~ I I i I
. ~ C- G~r~w /{r~• ~ Y►'t~Y A~~t
~ ' I s
r W`'`, 25 3S i ~ 3Ss S 36' 36'
t ~
J,
In ' e: i y
t ~
I~~ i
' • M
V
23' DAruEWAy
M 6AfEMiNt i »S I ' j ' M+} l ~ vri t~
As.. zsB be•-/^~
NM
, I \ , fC1 o VI 0 0
~ 11 ~-•IS -s i- I! f"' ~ N ~ ~
~ ~ ` ~vo S~0►y~ ` ~e ~ SI0~1( I ~ ~ ~ ~ . N
, ~ .I fot C ' y pler LoT D Q►ta I o~~~ ~ , ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ;4^^, JtJ ° \ ? leo 3'r rr n 42 35 2.100 sq ►c r5
n i ~ 1
_ ~.►E+'. ~ ~o ~ 6o AV A n►1; ~
ct~ , . .
~ • ~ r ~
4r-Dw. fr~f - ~ . ~ • ` ~ r w~r - l~t I '
~ ~ x0-•+~ _ _ _ ~ ~ 9 ; _ ffi L 1_
',~G SoldrrA ^ EASaia.~T ii Mur
y 3 i t0! fw~ 10 f~w4 fASomr~ ~e• w~u r ~0 ~ f / ~r
L au ~ ~
-~.u t~ o
~ `a0 S vl so.
' i ~"►Yn~ ~ ~ ryr~~~ ~
ja16l-r
` f1f ruTm, AW
R~
~
. ~8'¢ ID' - l e9 oNd . LunJStoPed Asw A 7036 1y1( 2.08 iwcnt toi A Z2o c- Ff
~ 10 hAsGal All C 459t fyfT 208 sWo( g.a bca 260 6" fL ~
loT S1ZE5 A1G /(9/f+ iyfa lo-dScnrrJ A„a B(j> .5378 qFl 9rkl,,,g a~~~r~ AbGD 23' (iPt?4W1ja
l
of Sll(S B!D I/9J{+ s~ ft Imyeb~rowi A.•4 A 4,878 rrr G~oii bu,d~•~ Cavr~y. A6CD 2,1a7 s?UAJl7s Ptr LeT Four 1 +►tro ►6 1 oot Ael C 5,378 yll ArKiNf tp9401 ►11.n.ij Ft. bT 9 „d f Ru s.*.c c DAVtD KmCne►
No OF STORY TWO Ar*a P~D 6,S71 (If ►.u.f) oo•s ~ . L01 J Ap S.u
i P P r ~ 8l0 SwTw Mg«. ad
SpeYAUC W4 4a2oj
~ ' ~ PN 478•0123 Ar.,l -i INt
~
- ~ RECE1VED
.
J U N a 3 1996
SPOKANE COU]e1TY HEARING EXAIVIINElZ SPOKANE CQUN TY CNGlNEER
In the Matter of a Zone Reclassification ) NOTICE OF
from Urban Residen(ial-3 5(UR-3 5) ) PUBLIC 13EAR.HNG
to Urban Residenhal-22 (UR-22) )
)
File No zN-17-96 )
TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers vviihin 400 feet of proposal,
as listed on Spokane County Assessor's records
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEAR.[NG WILL BE HELD ON THE
ABOVE-REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICA7"ION, AS SET FORTH BELOW-
Hearing Date: June 19, 1996 Time: 10.30 a.m
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works
F3uilding. 1026 West Broaduray, Spokane; Washington
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residentia.l-22
(UR-22) for development af 16 multiple family residences.
Applicant: David KatCher, 810 S. Pierce Road, Spokane, «!A 99206, 509-928-0123
Property, Owner: Same
Owner's DcsignAted Contact: Same
Locarion: Generally located west of and adjacent to University Road, east of Oberlin Road, in
the NE '/4 of Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM
PrnCPr'.), aLldress- 512 S tlniversitv
Zoning: Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Environmental I)etermination (SEPA): A Determination of Nonsignificailce has been issued.
The Division of Building and Plaiuung is the lead agency. The official comment period ends
June 17. 1996.
Related Permits Not lncluded in Application: None proposed concurrent wlth proposed zone
reclassiCcation.
nivision of Building and Planning Staff Contact Person: Louis Webster, Planiier 11
~
, w
Hearing Procedure: Pu.rsuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171, 96-0293 and
96-0294, as may be supplemented by the Spokane County Code
All interested persons may attend the public hearing Written comments or documents may be
submitted at or prior to the hea.ring, but if at all possible should be submitted to the Division of
Building and Planning prior to tbe hearing. Timely written materials submitted will be
considered by the Hearing Examiner and made a part of the record Testimony will be allowed
on the proposal and related envirorunental documents and issues. Tllis will be the only open
record hearing allowed on the application. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will
be based on the record established at tltis hearing. Appeals must be taken to the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County for decisions on applications for a rezone, or an application
fnr a combined rezone and preliminary plat Appeals must be taken to the superior court for all
other applications State Environmental Policy Act appeals shall follow the same procedural
route as the underlying actions
The following pi•acedural rules have been established to allow a fair and orderly hearing•
1. The Hearing Examiner may lunit the time given to speakers for or against a proposal
2. A speal:er representing each side of the issue is encouraged
3 Only specifically relevant testimony to the proposal will be accepted
4. Cross-examination may be allowed at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner.
5 The proJect file «riU be adopted by the Heartng Eaaminer as part of the record.
6 The Hearing Examiner will take notice of Spokane County's Generalized Comprehensive
Land Use Plan, Zoning Code, and County Code.
Inspection of I`ile, Obtaining Copies of I)ocuments: The project file is available for
inspection in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, Public Works Building,
1026 West Broadway (MS-P), Spokane, VVA, 49260, between 8 a m and 4 p m, Monday through
Friday, except holidays T`he Staff Report of tlhe Division will generally be available seven
calendar days before thc scheduled hearing Copies of the Staff Report and other materials Nvill be
made available for the cost of renroduction If you have Any questions, please call the Division of
Building and Planrung at (509) 456-2205.
Aciditional InformAtion: The-'riearing EYaminer wiii nurrnally recess from 12 r~oon to I p.m.
Items not lieard or completed befdre 4 p m may be continued to a later date by the Hearing
Examiner. 4 p m. is the tentahve hearing adjourament time
All hearings wiU be conductzd in facilities wllich are accessible to disabled individuals
~ y~, a~l '
a A ' ly a !
. b~ ir♦ ~ d~ t~v~.rN V' 'r y i y Z `,,2 ~ ~
~ ~ ► : ~ 7~ , ~ , . - ' T ~ .,r~ '0
' d 1 ` o
q y~
' ' ~Y ~ ~ ~NM'ld~ ~'I.~r1~4 4 ~J • 1 ~ ~ If ry ~
4 r ~ ~ ✓ ~ A ~ `~t ~ ~ ~ ~ q d 1l
1 ~ b
9 a - • y~ 6.1R
_ i ~ a ~f • , ~ . ~ . ~ j Q ~ x~ 0 7 ~ f E
C%4
I 5 A . M M`
~ ~ , N `vG ~ r, ~ ~ ~ . e Q h •t r ,i
~ ; ~ ~ ~ •
1.~ • ' j,i+k;r': • : B ; : , ' .
~ ~ ~ ♦ ~ ' . ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ t ti ~ 1
p'L
61 ~ ~ „t, ,c 4
~ 9 •~.p 1 ~ • ~r ~0 ~
Z ~
*8
a~~ 10 00 60
,
v• P$
~f T II! ~
• ~ ~ 9
~ tir .e • i , Q . G ~ 9 ~4 aea o I 'o p{OOaD ~
o ~ t4
~ A 4• ~ Ot 6
or '
~ ~4Ob y ti
1 I 1- ~ r ltN
I- r t ~ t~1 • ~ 1
t ~4 ~
TM ~^,i~ { e .r f~ ~ ~ R v G ~6 • ~9 , ~ ~ t ~'f N~ 2ti'► ~
~ p
CrI7
i3
~ ~ p , e , • i { ~ y ~ ~ o ~ • ti t ~ ' ` ~ . ~1 , , ,.e' 6 q ~ ,
~ '
a
~1 o ~ s~ ~ '0 7 d«~' , i~ 1 ~ 1 r ►7 '
~grVrNt~`
10t 40L
s~ Or) 8~ . ~ 1 'C~
rn
a
$QI b q o ~ l`~ 1 w t . ~ 1
i '
L1
1Q~K~ ~t~ ~g* O i 1= ~ •i~b ~ i
1 ~ ~ ~
a
.
, 1•••
1 ~!b A`-~''~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ p•.
~
. , ~
~ ~ d
r
1 ~
1 j~~ ~
_
t
7,.96
I~~ • - ~ - - - - - - , -~t~ 1 - ' _ „ ~ _
I ~ _ • • 4 ~ ' • • ~ ' ~ . o
~:~:i• ~
~ ° ~ ~ ~
g i
~AL 6< I
Q Q Q ~ ~
' Q 0
kP4
~ ~+toisca ~ ~ o
~LL Y
1 ~ 6.. P~11 O Qd ~ ~
,i
0• E- ~ Q d . I
~ a MA1 N ~ PA 1 N a VE
~ J
4 J ~rea~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ • ' ~ i?Iv66RSlOe
6C i
z ; d F i r 6
l~
x 4oiic,r = ' SP C: u~. Et. /9 95
_
Y o ~ ~ _ • 10lIS' • ♦ T 1
IS- o~~► COUNT`d • ROAM._-- ~NQ 23120 •Q ~ A B
.St P IC Ae~°R Ca'~~~ • M/LWAUKEE RAJ LROAD - :
~ • ~ , . t ~...~..r , ~ r-~ _ -
~
5rrj /iV6 ~4
, . L,. . r.. .
FOVRTH AdE. OURTK AY
_ ~ - - ~ 'u ? X
~ ~g h W
o z ' lx - J 0
< W -
~ .
s M 3 ~
~h Q .
o ~ ~ > 7 Tt4 SEdV-N7N ,
O •a _
nvE t~. g TN TN EtG~+TH AY
, •
.
! ; ~ 9 TM 9rx
• ~ '
.
~p lOr O TN
+
E C'~~ ~ I 1 TN
~ g 14M . _ .
l • ' •
1 - ~ •I~ 1~41~i • ~
z i;im.P~~~E.
~ ,.~r.~ ~
g a~~;f ~ ~
o
tn~
r C"
~ > ' tll Qh~ CA
o
- _ ~ - 6m d w ~ ~ t
3'r - _ - - , ro L i ~ ED
. + .
• Q .I
4
_ ~ . ~ r
~
0 a ~ovu
6/ I9/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 1
Cm~ I ~ , _ •
9 ,
~ 00-0
s ~
, ~ . , ~ , ~
~ I ' ~ r
t J ~ I~►
.~r ~ _ ~ a ► o = ' p
~ 0 4 ~ m,v • P„o.~*.~
N .
4 ` ~ • ~
° cC ~ N d UR ' v~ Z '
UR' va~8.9
J ~ a ZZ 1:,-,199:1
R22
' ftAp rp► •
• ~
~ .`Rj$
dA 2'~' • ~
o 213%
p ~
~ Nt
U ~
► ~ uRZ OD
a - ROA
Q s~ ~ ~IL.WAVKF~~...~ , . •rr
~ ~ o Q,~.. a rd ~ 7 OuR~
3 ~
S G a o
ri ~
~ , -
4L . .0 ~ p r
V ~
~ a ~ ~R ~ • 3
~ s:o v a Y~
.
N H
. t tY►
~as 7 ~ T r a,
q ~1 d u► a _
• . T►~► o,TN r
~1 4 a ~ ~TN ~ • TH tQTN
a R- 22 , . • g
p IO Y
•
r• 2 ~ ~ .,,,.~s,fi. ~ [o
,rRr
~ t r A~c gitc:3e$
o ~ - ~
I orik •VF 12 " %
bi
, t~~ ~ ~ ~ A,,, p • d
0 ~ I
1 'a L~ Z -
~
~ . ~ O ~
1f •
f ~
' " . ~ •i'
~ uR ~ • . ~ ~ ~
L 1991 ~ Ua. , , .
o. ~
p age 2
~ '
0
:
. .
e O~ foT Z~_1?-96
61 1919b I~ Staf~ R P
7~9~y
Z r i. ~
~
-
~ • p~yl4t
_ ,~a°'~'~ vr~~ay . _
e ater ~ • Par ~ ~ ar~aa+a+
.v~ •
~ ~ ~ ~y^~a + ~ r ~N~ .•t's'SO'.~~~ ~ ~ j,`~_~.~p. t7/~~
....sssy- ~
Rs E~ • ♦ ' ~ ~ Jrr+~'a
E
1 a ~ ~ sa a s ~
t. ~ ~ - ~ ~as~ss~ ~ ► ~
a J` sAeU a ~ t
t ~ ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ,--n~.,c.._ ~ ~ ~
~M s' e_
~ ~ •
~
•
16
17
I ao~ ~ ~ ~ f ~
1$ ~ . ~ ~ • t ~ ~ ~ y i k ~ " '
Q d a h~ki !r
~,1 Q~ ` ~`-rc ~ ~ ~
a a i
well "`ub .
.
i948
¢p*k . . i Sto • . w POel
P „
,
.
„ 'M1Lw ~i.,~E ~ s ~ •
• ~ (f`t 1 ~ w ~ • b • ~+---t _'`~'"s'°T~'
4.
~ ~ + ~ ~ t
120 : ' IAO
' mQ , ~ L~ .
~ ` ~6e~
~ i~``r~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ • ~ _ . • ~
O • ~ ~
i p ~ n1~ .~s~s~~{• ~
U
4m _ _ ~
The : . ~ ~ ~ ` a; ~C-i ~ ~ _
. ~
Ps
'
04
►7 - r ~ t ~ ~ . . ~:___--'E;~.~~~ _ - e ~
f ' . <
~ • ` ~
. • - - ` M ~ .r ~ ~ :'1 ' ' ~ ~ i a ~ I
' ~ 1~ ~r n ~ ♦ ~ ~ 28 • ~1
~~,~1 ~y Oi► M ; _ f~ ~ ' w
` • ~I~ • a
~ 2
,
6 4 r~ C ~i~,~ •
J '
r ~ J a ~ ` ~ .r ~IS~'~' ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ I~ `~n 1
a r
y, 4
~ • 't
• ~ ~ ~ ~ j • ; ~
O ~M 1~ ~ ' ~~J _ ~ ` J
1 ► ~ _ •
♦ IJ~► ~1~, \ « t ~ . e s 4r-- ~as
. ~ • I r • "'r~ , 1 \ \ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ?r_ ~ 'r-
P' ~I' y ~ ~ 0.... ~ ~
~ ~r•' ~ '~'~j f • / ~ ~ aa-i~~+'~} ln••
-WOM ~ - ~ • i
' ti•
~ l . ti 33~ ~ 33
. ~
• " .f~
3
tfi~ Page
~
S~ Repo~ for Z'-17-96
b! l 9i96 HE
96-L t-3Z iO3 Und-311 iJI31S a14 96i6 t{9
~ d _ - _ - Y
~
C !
~ {.E EG. • r
~ ` ~ ~ ~ • 4 - ~ ,
u
i ~ Q~• M, I _ ~ •
O~ ^ r
~ j rmo
~ • a„ - - ~ ~
It ^T~ : ~ a: ~ - ♦ , • ~ ~ v0 ~ b ~ ~
p ~ ~o~ 4 t►.~ Y ~ $
v N''~ t ~ ' • ~ p ` ~
--cso«Ra~►►`i~ 8Z - ' ~ n ' ~
~
, • ~
~ ~ 4.+ , ~ ~ ' ~ •
r 41
' 1 ~ _'~5~ . ~ : _ : N'~ • -
( 1 L `i ~ • i . ` ~
IL..s
i~ =~tt~'.a~'r pso. tl ~ -
@'
- ~ b ~ ~ I
~.oi f . ~ , - . ~ ~ - - , ; ' • ~ ` ~
ozoP 1oZ o
~ d ~
1%t0~~
u6tS d.? ~ ~ ~II ~ C~
I ~.~,u ~ opps 1 . ~ ~
• ~ ~ ~ • • t 1 " Si ~ ~
• ~ j ~
b 8 - ~w~ri
~ ~d~a 0~'~~ , - 3 S ~~y, • to r 'II ut'~ i4 ~ '
_ ►L...j► ~st
Y ~ ~ +
I.1yu81 41
_r ~ JL 'a~"-'~4 - l ~ o y , F ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ `I '3.~ y!
439 401H ir
IQuld 4I1OK 9T 6oA
9 ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ B M • 1 ` r
~ a"'. _ _
,
7NflOB IA
(7■ ~ ~ 'i(~ . ~ , ' a.
■ y- L p
~
t~11 • ~ ' O r~ ~ 9 _ '
o ~ . x►►ni -
. ~
silQd
• ` J~ t ~
.
96r=L
~
- ' I I
~
~ j . cn I0.1u ,'0 ~ ~ w''~I ~ t`0 I~~ - 0.3 rfl 1
~ ~
N I~~ ~ .w~ f fa~ ~M ~ I/o j Ii, I ,
C
~.a8~~ ~ ? ~ • ° ' ~ a ' !~'d ~ << ~
!"'a ~ ~ , u
MM Qf~1~e• `~v ~ ~ .rs
is ~ 4~
•!Q ' ~ • r ; ►Zn~ej'
'J " ,
e♦ ~ r 0 QW
rn w E = r ~ ~ ~ . ,e,42 .
~ , .
~ ~ r ~1 ~ r
F-+ tIn e ~ ~9~ 1 `F ~1r~~~1M~ ~~l + ~ .~wi ~r:l i.: 1
w- -~rrr~ •~K.~ I« ~
00
~ ~ • e • ~e.~ ~ p ~ C / C A ~P • a ~ ~
,
a A;~1 , n.!• cv~tt i m T
~ .
rn
J►VO e9
s e p q~ ~ ,~'f~`'' •~j , • ~Pd , ~
~ U ' ' i { ~ ' "a~e., a+~► t w.rsa ~
c'1' j
o~ ~
~
~
-Iy ti~~r~:•.~ il ~ 'l[ . 3 ~+I~ `
~ ►~'-~~w~~~l~ll~~'
~
O ~ ~ lYB'~• ~t /6~:♦
-q r
toe s,...L ~ o xoe w~.,4 i lo r,.~' T
`~I rotito ~M w~n~. ~YSI.YT w•
JL
O ( . ~ ~ ~ ~s'-•-,--is'-~ , ~ ~
RV. fttKfy r„iA STo►r\ I'.p s'romr RV
` ~ .
y pteN \ 1er 8 ~ V N.o rzra ; ~ '
~
R1 2
.1ioo
N `
73
V N ~ lQt ~ I-~ ` \ ' ` • + i '
;D . `
\
~ d
~ • D~wo t~~a '1„~ I Ir- 7J' - 40'...~..iss-~'
, C.r.a A.rw co' y►t~tr ~ra~ 1 l
-11
i L,,, 3Sf 9S,S ~ ~ 1~ t~,~ ~ 4 , .
n • 2! ~ •
i ~ Mn 36 96 .
Ro t~~•Af ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~
a
"
23 oaIvEwny ~ 1~ ° M
ry fASEM6Mf i aff ~ M
4rrr,v As.. 2f~ ~ 4►.0.,. A.r,
9: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-t~ I! ~ p ~ cr. a ~
~ ` r~o Sro►r , ` a srcMy , er-,~ W►- ~
R ! , ,
ior c y acr~ ~ toT D yft« I tlf 0,5
;4"" 2rao IF cr n ~ 9s' s.ia+ Jy ►c
♦ ~ ae i
Rn .rt ~ tf'
i eaK-7
~ R1~
~
~ ~ ~ xc ~ _ - _ - ' D.:. :r~T L f' - j - • . ~ . _r
. ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - ...G..~J ~
I `e0~ N' 51•4r~ ~ EA5a,a..7 10 Sar1 , fAS~iw~d a' N4r ! 101 S+~l
JL
o - T W i ir a~.~~~ urJ 87.h~•r~• /6t••
Rw /is nY.u RW
~s ~ IA~ . l e9 oNd ~ LUhJSCapta A►.> A 7,036 iyf I A08 5wevt tsr A Zxo u~ it
~ ~ l•hascoprd A~r, C 6,531 r~ fT 2oB sW.~c ~r ecZ
200 u~ Fi
m ~oT S~ZES A:G / 9! f LeNds~n ~d A~~. B ~ A~ „-g l
a ~ { f`P ~ r ~D .9378 a (~;~1 n. aro A6cD 23'
lQ ~o~ Slt[S 8iD l191q Tr Ir ~m~l~~rou3 l~rso /q 4878 yfr 6ios, br~N~•~ Cfn
,q~. lI6CD 2i1~ '+y Fr !
uA!l~S Per LoT ~oyr l~y ~u~eut A.o~ C 378 'J!1
r ~ larKrHf ►81oneel pao geT 9,804 1 Ru flAVlb KA?tAer
cT1 No OF STORY ~ two 5,
ImPe.s,o.t n 6571 0- S .pn u..►) ~e•~,~,~ r. Lo1 (.,,,~f AY wr.cr BIO $m4TN h1w Rd
$poCAul W4 41zo1
7 CN 420•012I Apr4 3 119t
c
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANIVING REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING E R
FItOM: CURRENT PLANNIING SECTION
DATE: JUNLi 19, 1996
SUBJECT: ZE-17-96; ZONE RECLASSIEFICATIOIV FROM ITRI3AN
ItESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR 3.5) 7'O URBAN RESIDENZ'LAL-22
(UR-22)
1. GENERAL INFORM.ATION
Appticant: David A Katcher
$10 S. Pierce Road
Spokaile, WA 99206
(509) 928-0123
Contact Planner: Louis Webster
Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to University Avenue, east
of Oberlin Road, soutll of 4th Avenue, in the NE 1/4 af Section 20, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Y'roposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3.5) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for development of 16 multiple fanuly residences.
U. SI-'E IIVFOR1VIATION
A. Site Sizc: Approximately 1 1 acres
B. Comprclicnsive Plan
1. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan category of the subaect
property is Urban and the subject property is within the Priarity Sewer
Service Area (I'SSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay
Zone. The Urban (U) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land
uses. Due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in the
Urban Category, there are few land use activities that would be
inappropriate. Residential net densities are suggested to range from 1 to
17 dwelling units per acre in the Urban categozy. The density proposed m
thls application is 13 33 dwelling units per acre and is within the
suggested range Multi-family siructures will usually be a transitional use
located between single-family residentia] and the more intensive areas.
Goal 1 1 of the Comprehensive Plan states "Encourage a variety of
housing types and densities " Objective 1 l.b states " I-iigher density
developments such as multifamily and mobile home (ma.nufactured
6/ l 9/96 StafE' Report for ZE-17-96 Page 6
homes) parks should be located with direct or near direct access to the
major arterial systems rather than on interior neighborhood streets. Access
to pubtic transportation should also be considered." Objeetive l.l.c states
"When multi-family dwellings are to be located adjacent to single-family
areas, careful consideration must be given to the density and designs of the
mulnple family development so as to ensure protection of the amenilies of
the single-family area." Decision Guideiine 1.1.3 for Objectives 1.1.b and
1 l.c states that "A multifanuly dwelliog structure should• a) locate
adjacent designated arterials; b) locate near existing or planned public
transit routes; c) improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single-
family area amenities."
Goal 1.5 "Encourages a healthful and plensing environment in the county's
residential azeas." Objective 1.5.a states "New residential or multiple-
family developments should be buffered from existing adjacent land uses
where adverse effects may develop." Decisioa Guideline 1.5.1 states
"Buffering and/or landscaping will be used to mitigate the differences
between proposed developments and existing uses." Declsion Guideline
15.2 states "Landscaping may be required to provide a healtliful and
pleasing resideneial environment."
Half the proposed development is adjacevt a pnncipal artenal aind half has
near direct access to the same principal arterial. The proposed
development is near existing public transit facilities and may improve or
mainfain fihe consistency of adjacent single-family area amenities. The
proposal incorporates landscaping as required per Spokane County Zoning
Code Section 14.806.
T1ie proposed zone reclassification i.cnplements the majority of the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban Category of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Arterial Road Plan• The subject property is located adjacent to
University Road, which is identified by the Spolcane County Arterial Road
Plan as a 100 foot Pnncipal Arterial. Implementation of the Arterial Road
Plan requires tUat the applicant set aside 13 5 feet of property along
University Road for a Future Acquisition Areas (FAA) as shown on the
site plan
3. County Parks Plan: Balfotu Park is located less than amile north of the
subject Property and is the Spokane County Park closest to the site.
C. Site ChAracteristics: The site is level and has a dilapidated single family
residence and garage on the north east quarter of the subject property. The
balance of the property is vacant and undeveloped.
D. Neighborhood Characteristics: Tlle subject property is soutli of and adjacent
to The Gardens at Un.iversity, a Cornmunity Residential Facility. South of and
adjacent to the subject property is a former single family residence converted
into a full servic;e hair salon. Further south and west of the subject properfy are
all sulgle family residences. Across University, to the east, are single family
residences. Apart from the Community Residential Facility to the north of the
6/19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 7
subjecl property, there are no multi-fanvly residential units in the inlnmediate
vicinity. The Spokane Transit Authority University Park and R.ide facility is
located 1/2 block norih of the subject property
E. Zooing Analysis. The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone was established to
provide for the orderly development of residential property in a manrier that
provides a desirable living environment that is compatible with surrounding
land uses and assures the protection of property values. It is intended that this
zone be used as an implementation tool for the Urban Comprehensive Plan
Category The highest density residentiai zone, UR-22 is intended primarily for
multlple-family dwellings and is usually located adjacent to major or secondary
arterials. UIZ-22 zoning exists adjacent to the subjeci parcel to the north and
across University Road to the east The proposed zoning will implement the
Comprehensive Plan aad is consistent with existing adjacent zoning.
Proposal Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58).
North Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) established w 1991, previously
established as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) in 1962 (22-62).
South• Urban Residentiat-3 5(UR-3 5) established in ] 991, previously
established as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58)
East Urban Resideniial-3 5(UR-3 S) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-
22) established in 1991, previously established as Agricultural
Suburban (AS) and Residential Office (RO) in 1955 (171-55)
and 1980 (93-80c)
West Urban Restdential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural Suburban (AS) in 1958 (37-58).
F. Laod tlse Analysis: Tlie subject property is located on a major north/south
arterial corridor four blocks from a major east-west commercial strip. The area
is in a transition area from traditional single family residential uses to more
intense uses
Site Single family residence wlth an accessory structure.
North• Community Residential Facility
South. Single family residences and hair salon.
East• Single family residences.
West: Single fanlily residences
G. Site Plan: The site plan shows the subaect property consistuig of four parcels
each with a four-plex uiut wifih six parkzng spaces plus a total of four extra
parking spaces for recreational vehicles Full implementation of the site plan
(creation of parcel eonfiguration) wlll reqwre compliance with the Spokane
County Subdivision Ordinance The Spokane County Zoning Code requires one
and a half parking spaces per dwelling unit Points oF ingress and egress are
shown from University Road on the east and Oberlin Road on the west
Landscaping i•equirements per Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.806 are
shown adjacent to both roads, tlie existing UR-3 5 zaning to the northwest and
along the south property line adjacent to exisung UR-3.5 zoning. The site plan
does not show the existing sidewalk on University Road nor the existing sight
6/ 19/96 Staff Report for ZE- l 7-96 Page 8
.
obscuring fence along the north property line. More than adequate building
setbacks are shown on the site plan
The site plan subnutted for review by the Hearing Examiner is general in nature.
Detailed review to determine compliance with all Zoning Code regulations and
conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur prior
to issuance of a Building or Change of Use Permit.
Use: 16 multiple family residences
Proposed buildings: Four
Site Coverage: 18%
Square Footage: 8,400 Square Feet
Building Setbacks Pronosed ReQUired
Front yard (University Rd.) 73.5 feet 55 ! 25 feet
Froat yard (4berlin Road) 73.0 feet 55 / 25 feet
Side yard (nortli) 10 feet 5 feet/story
Sicie Yard (south) 20 feet 5 feet/story
Rear yard 15 feet 15 feet
Parking 28 spaces 24 spaces
Maximum
Structure Height• 23 feet 50 feet
H. Cyrculution: The property will be accessed from University Road and Oberlin
Road via the driveways as shown on the site plan Firz District #l will need to
approve ihe proposed access prior to the issuance of building permits
1. Drainage• A drai.nage plan will be requued prior to the issuance of any
building permits. Tbls plan must be reviewed and approved by the County
Engineer's Depariment prior to building permits being issued.
J. Power 'I'ransmission Lines/Other Knowrn Easements: None known
K. Water Sapp9y: The proposal is served by the Modern Electric Water
Company. Provisions for water service are required pnor to the issuance of a
building perinit.
L. Sewage Dispnsal: A public sewer system is available to #he site. Plans and
specificahons will be reviewed and approved pnor to the issuance of any
building permits.
M. Sehool. The proposal is in the Central Valley School District. No comment has
been received.
N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. A letter dated
March 11, 1995 states that the rire District has no objection to the zone
reclassification.
6I19/96 Sta.ff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 9
O. Cultural Resources None have been identified.
P. Parks And Recreation: No comments have been received
Q. Wetlands No wetlands aze shown on the Spokane Gounty Wetlands Inventory
Maps.
III. ENVIRONMEIVTAL ItEVIEW:
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by tbe
Division of Building and Planrung. The review considered the specifics of the
proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws,
possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and
other County policies and guidelines. The Division of Building and Planning has
determined ihat "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance
("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 13 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future develoPment for review and comment.
The "DNS" comment period ends June 17, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by lEtter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posfied on the proposal site The
Heanng Examiner may consider addttional environmental related tesumony at the
public hearing.
IV. DIVISION OF BUILDING ANI) PLANNING SLJMVIARY &
RECOIViMENDATION
The proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone implements the majority of the
Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban Category of the
Comprehensive Plan The proposed use is consistent with the ex2sUng land use and
zoning trznds tn the neighborhood The-Division of Building and Planning
recommends approval, as conditioned
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner s6all be binding on the
"Applicant", which terffis shall include the owner or owners of thc
proPerty, heirs, assigns and successors.
ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property:
That portion of Block 229, OPPORTUNITY, accordtng to plat recorded in
Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, in Spokane County, Washington, desciibed as
follows.
Begimajng at a point on the East line of said Tract 386.4 feet South of the
Northeast comer thereof, and running thence West on a line parallel with the
North line of said Tract, 327 2 feet, more or less, of the West line of said
6/19/96 Staff Repori for ZE-l 7-96 Page 10
Tract: thence South along the West line of saud Tract, 64.4 feet; thence East on
a line parallel with the North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet, more or less, to the
East line thereof; thence North along said East line, 64.4 feet to the point of
beginning,
And that portion of said Tract 229 described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of said Tract, 450.8 feet South of the
Northeast corner thereof, and running thence West on a line parallel with the
North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet more or less to the West line of said Tract;
thence South along the West line of said Tract, 96.6. feet; thence East on a line
parallel with the North line of said Tract, 327.2 feet, more or less to the East
line thereof; thence North along said East line 96 6 feet to the place of
beginning.
Excepting therefrom that portion deeded to the County of Spokane by
Statutory Warranty Deed recorcled Marcli 1, 1991 under Recording No.
9103010051.
SPOKAN]E COUriTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND i'LANNING
1 The proposal shall comply with the Urba.n Residential-22 (UR-22) zone and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended
2. The applicant sha11 develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept
presented to the Hearing Body. Variations when approved by the Division
Director/designee, may be nermitted, iMCluding, but not limited to buildmg location
landscape plans and general allowable uses of tlie pennitted zone All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zaning Code, and the original
intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. The Division of-Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject ta a
variety of special conditions unposed as a result of approval of a land use action.
T}us Title Notice shall serve as publiG nottce of the condition.s of approval affecting
the property in question. The Tltle Notice should be recorded wittun tbe same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Spokane County Division of Building Planning. The Title Notice shall generally
piovide as follows:
The parcel of property legslly described as [ ] is the subject of a land use
actioa by a Spokane County Hearing 8ody or Administrative Official on [
j, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is
availablc for inspection and copying in the Spokane County I)ivision of Buiiding
and Planning.
4. A.pproval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and
signung plan for the described propexty prior to the release of Any building
permits
6/19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 11
5 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for nlaintenance
acceptable to the Division Director/designee sllall be submitted with a
performance bond or other appropnate security, for the project, prior to release of
building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintamed so that sight
distance at access points is not obscured or impaired
6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the
property boundary
7 The applicant sha11 contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admirustered/enforced as
authorized by the State Building Code Act. Designldevelopment concerns include:
Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems,
building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior
wall protection, and energy code i•egulations. (Note: The Division of Building and
Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building
perniit )
Attached are conditions/comments submitted to the file frorn the following agencies:
Spolcane County Health District, dated May 29, 1996
Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, dated June 4, 1996
Spokane County Division of L7tilities, clated June 11, 1996
Spokane County Davision of Development Services, dated JLune 10, 1996
Spokane County Air Poliution Control Authority, dated June 3, 1996
Washuigton State Department of Ecology, Dated June 12, 1996
Central Valley School District, dated May 29, 1996
6/19/96 Staff Report for ZE-17-96 Page 12
`~-)flx~ courrrY xE~,~ Dls~..~
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
R9AY 3 0 1996
DNISION OF BUILDINO AND PLAPIPIINO DATE: May 29, 1996
8Y
TO: uis Webster, Planner II, Spokane County Building and Planning Division
FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II- EHD, SCHD
4"W?_Z~ RECEfVED
SPOKANE CpUNTY
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change: ZE-17-96 (Katcher) NAY 3 0 9996
DIVI610N OF BUILpINQ qP1p plANNIPIG
1. Referznces: BY:
a) Map of subject, by Applicant, dated Apri13, 1996, received by this office May 28, 1996.
b) Reconnaissance Geoloeic Man of the West Half of tUe Snokane Ouadranele, Washineton and Idaho,
Allan B. Crriggs, 1966
c) Soil Survev, Snokane Countv, Washineton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Snokane Countv. Washineton. Eneineerine Interaretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e) Snokane Countv Rules and Reeu.lations for Sewaee Disnosal Svstems, January 19, 1995
fl Logs of water weUs in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sechons 17, 19, 20, 21, and 29
g) Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E, U.S.G.S, 1973.
2. Findings
a) T'his project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Modern
Electnc Water Company Water supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topograpliy and soils in
the area are generally si.utable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not
of the proper dimensions to permit the use of both individual wells and sewage systems.
d) The project lies m a relatively flat area west of Universil}► and north of Sixfih Avcnue. Local
drainageways are insignificant
I'wp»ed %one Chcui6e: ZC-17-96 (kcAtcher) ~
I'tt~tc• ?
C) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loam with 0% to
5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible
contamination of groundwater This soil would be classified as a Type IV
i) Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very large amouats of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section lf shows they are
from 40' to 325' deep and have static water levels varying from 25' to 210' below the surface. Tlie
Modern Electnc Water Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent.
3. Required (matidatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Urilities, Spokane Counfiy.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to
each lot Use of i.ndividua] on-site sewage disposa.l systems shall not be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c• Sponsor David Katcher
810 S Pierce Rd
SPokane, WA 99206
landuse,iolkntcher u-17-4G
.
. . • I'
OFFICE OF THE SPOR:ArJE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
70NE C~LANGF -
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Louis Webster
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard 5f/
DATE: June 4, 1996
SUBJ~ECT : ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS ZE- 017 - 96 KATCHER, DAVID ~
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
Design Review Meeting scheduled March 6, 1995.
Prior to selease of a buildiag permit or uee of property as proposed:
£40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
£43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Eagineer drainage and access
plans.
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be eubmitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The desigzi, locataon arid arrangement of parking stalls shall
be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved
by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sectiona and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 aa amended and are
applicable to thie proposal.
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspectaon and approval by the County Engineer.
E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road as a 100 foot Principal
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 73 feet ia not consistent with that
specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it i6 recomnended
that a strip of property 13.5 in width along the University Road frontage be eet aside
in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Improvements are made to IIniversity Road.
E90 The applicant ahould be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicante property, includiag property to be dedicated or set
aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for
adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Sngineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work.
C. David Katcher, S 810 Pierce, Spokane WA 99206
j •
~
To; LOUIS WEBSTER, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Spokane County Utili4ies
Da4e: 6/11/96
Subject Conditions of Approval
Plaenning Action Number: ZE-0017-96 Type of Action: LP Katcher, Oavid Zone Reclass
Applicant Katcher, David Legal Owner. Katcher, David
810 S. Pierce Rd 810 S. Pierce Rd.
Spokane WA 99206 Spokane WA 99205
Sewer Senrice:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer
connection permit is required. (See item 12)
SS12 Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for :(1)Public Sewer Connec#ions
and Facilities (2)9etrbte-~~ ' s (4)Qry
review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to finalization of the
project and or the issuance of pemnit to connect
(Public Sewer)
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicabfe sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit
Water Service:
1IUS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
Memorandum JUN 10 1996
Oilll6lON OF BUIL,DINQ AND PLAAINlNG
Date: June 10, 1996
sY:
To: Department of Building and Planning
ATTN: John Pederson, Lauis Webster
From: Development Services (Ed Parry, P.Z4.)
Subjects Z$17-96 Katcher Rezone (Apartmeate - 512 South Univerefty)
Drafnage Concept Study Not Required
1. The SCS Soils Survey map indicates that this site is nominally
underlain by soils which are "pre-approved" by the current Guidelines for
Stormwater Management for drywell use, without additional percolation
testing.
2. A Drainage Concept Study is not needed prior to the County Engineer
recommending approval of this land use action at the Hearing Examiner.
It appears that the Sponsor will be able to demonstrate that adequate
infrastructure for stormwater management can be provided, either through
a system that meets the requirements of the current editi-on of the
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Managernent, or through an
alternate system concept acceptable to the County Engineer.
cc: Bill Hemmings
Pat Harper
. I
- ,
T / ~ r
SPOKANE COUNTY
Q CLEi AR ,veA 1] AIR POLlUT10N
S P Z. K.o. N E C4NTROl AUTNORfTY
WEST 1101 COLLEGE. SUITE 403 e SPOKANE. WA 99201 0(509) 456-4127 Fax (509) 459-6828
Date: June 3, 1996
To: Louis Webster
Spokane County Buiiding & Planning
From: Mabel Caine
Spokane County Air Poilution Controi Authority
Subject: SCAPCA COMMENTS REGARDING : File No. ZE-17-96
Develooment of 16 multinle familv residences - 512 S Universitv
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the environmental documents submitted to our
office. Following is a list of concernsfissues that, at a minimum, need to be addressed for this
project. SCAPCA, encourages proponents to contact their offices at 1101 West College.
Spokane, WA 99201 for additional information
* All air pollution regulations must be met.
Arr pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should
be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well
as emissions from all other construction related act+vities.
* SCAPCA strongl,y recommends that all travelled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking
areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emiss+ons.
~ Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. 1f tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
# Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., vegetative material, construction waste, etc...).
# Demolition and renovat+on projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40, Part
61, Subpart M and SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IX, which address asbestos abatement
issues. Intent to Demolish forms are available at the SCAPCA office.
, wo Prmfed ai &-cytttd Paprr
SCAPCA Comments
Page 2
File IVo.ZE-17-96
Some objectionable odors will likely result from this project. SCAPCA's regulations state
that effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a
minimum.
~ Ail solid fuei burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must comply with local,
state, and federal rules and regulations.
Failure to meet SCAPCA regulations may resuit in delays, closure and civil and/or criminal
sanctions.
J t
sT"RECEIVED
o ~ SPOKANE CQUNTY
~ e~°~~ 1889 r~Y JU N 14 1996
STATE OF WASNINGTON ONIStON OF BUILOINt3 ANp p1.AMtdIN4
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY gY
4601 N. Monroe, Suite 202 o Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 0 (509) 456--2926
June 12, 1996
Mr. Louis Webster
Spokane Courity Division of
Building and Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Dear Mr. Webster:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the
determination of nonsignificance for the rezone of property
as proposed by David Katcher. We reviewed the environmental
checklist and have the following coauments.
The water purveyor is responsible for ensuring that the
proposed use(s) are within the limitations of its water
rights.
If you have questions, please call Gene Drury in our
ShorelandsfWater Resources Program at (509) 456-7661.
sincerely,
.
Heidi J. Ren2
SEPA Coordinator
/hj r
9643488
m °a~ ~ V~ey
~ ~ Schooi DLsnct 356
A0 EQqAl
OppoMuelty Emptoyer
Eaac 19307 Cacaldo
May 29, 1996 ~ (5091922~7MA 99016
Louis Webster
Spokanes County Planning Departiment '~A//'►~~
1026 West Broadway
Spokane WA 99260
RE: ZE-17-96
Dear Mr. Pederson:
This is in response to your request for comments regarding ZU17-96. 7[`he development will
be located i.n the Spokane Valley and will produce sixteen (16) new apartment units.
The Boazd of D'uectors of Central Valley School District has adopted a resolutioa which directs
the administration to take necessary action to mitigatre impacts upon the School District created
by housing developments. The authority for this action is SEPA, RCW 82.02.020 and RCW
58.17.110. t3nder these statutes, the County, prior to approving a subdivision, must determine
whether adequate provisions exist for public school service.
Tlie Central VaUey School District has determined ihat added dwellings envisioned by this
proposal will adversely impact the District's ability to provi.de adequate student housing. We
ask that Spokane County not approve ZE-17-96 unless the developer and Central Valley School
District agree to voluntary means of mitigating its adverse impact on the Central Valley School
District. The School District seeks a fee or other measure which would nutigate the impact by
partially funding cost of space to adequately house students residing in the proposed new
housing. This determination is based on the following:
1. The District's elementary schools are overcrowded. We are currently using portable
facilities. We have need for additional classroom space.
2. Enrollment projections indicate that the capacity of our schools to house students will
continue to be exceeded. Enrollment projections are based on a cohort survival rtlodel
which predicts future enrollment based on the past three years' enrollment growth by
grade level.
3. A number of housing developments have been submitted for preliminary plat approval
within the Central Valley School District. Many of these approved developments have
not been completed. Students from these developments will contribute to the
overcrowding of our schools.
ZE-17-96
Page -2-
In summary, Central Valley School District asks that Spokane County either de,ny the presently
proposed ZE--17-96, or approve it with the condition that the developer and Centcal Valley
School District agree to voluntary fees or other means of mitigation. It should be noted,
however, that said fees provide insufficient funding to support school construction nceds.
Thank you for requesting our comments. We trust you will find these comments useful in
assessing the impact of this proposal.
Sincerely,
Dave Jac - an
irector
D
NAuxiliary Services
ZE17.Cty
•
,
S P O I{ A N E C O LJ N T Y
OFFICE OF THE H£AR(NG EXANtiNER MICNAEL C DEMPSEY, CHrEF Exn?vuivER
July 9, 1996
David A. Ratcher
810 South Pierce Road
Spokane, WA 99206
Letter Opinion ZE-17-96, Rezone from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 S) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) for 16 Multifamily Residences
Dear Applicant
After review of the entire record, including the project fite, letters of opposition and the testimony
at the_ public hearing, I have decided to approve the above rezone application Approval will be
subject to the conditions of approval recommended by the various public agencies, as well as a
height limitation of 23 feet for the four-plex buildings proposed for the site Further, the site plan
must be revised to shovv a six-foot high "concrete, masonry or decorative block- wall, solid
landscaping, or sight-obscuring fence" along that portion of the west property line adjacent to the
Urban Residential-3 5(LJR-3.5) zone. The fencing requirement is per Section 14 622 365 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code
I find that conditions in the area have substantially changed since the original zoning of the
property, warranting a rezone of the site to the Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) zone This
includes the extension of public sewer to the area and the widening of University Road south of
Sprague Avenue to four lanes.
I also, find that the proposal is generally consistent with the Spokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated within the Urban category of thc Comprehensive
Plan The density of the proposal, at approximately 13 units per acre, is well within the
recommended residential density range of the Urban category of one to 17 units per acre
The Urban category recommends that mUltifamily dwellings locate with direct or near direct
access to the major arterial systems rather than on interior neighborhood streets The east half of
the project accesses directly onto University Road, a County Principal Arterial The west half of
the project (8 units) accesses directly onto Oberlin Road and Sth Avenue, which are local access
streets Vehicles from the west half of the project can readily access University Road by
proceeding either (1) south on Oberlin Road one block, then east on 6th Avenue for one block, or
(2) west on Sth Avenue for approximately one block, south on Raymond Road for one block,
then east on 6th Avenue for approximately two blocks While the west access is onto interior
neigliborhood streets, University Road is only a few blocks away It is also significant that the
applicant is not proposing the extension of Sth Avenue east to University. A through road along
Sth Avenue from University Road might have greater impacts on the single family neighborhood
located west of the site than the proposed access. Further, it has not been demonstrated that the
local access streets do not have capacity to carry the additional traffic from the proposal.
THIRa FLOOR PUBLIC WORI:S BUILnititG
1026 Wt-sr BttoAM,aYAvCNU6, SPotcnNE, WnstfIvC7'oN 99260-0245
PHOriE. (509) 329-3490 • FAx (509) 324-3478 • TDD: (509) 324-316G
Letter Opinion
ZE-17-96,
Page 2
The proposal is located near existing public transit faciliiies, as recommended in the Urban
category I also find that the praposal will maintain the consistency of adjacent single-family
amenities, and will enhance the residential character of the area. There are other more intensive
uses in the vicinity. The property immediately to the north, zaned Urban Residential-22 (UR-22),
is improved with a Community Residential Facility. Such facility and zone extends the same
distance west from University Road as the subject parcel Further north along the west side of
University Road, the land is zoned Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) and Regional Business (B-3).
The property immediately to the south is zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5), but is used for a
hair saton Further south is a parcel zoned Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, which also extends
the sarne distance west from University Road as the subject parcel. Urban Residentia1=22 (IJR-22)
zoning also exists across University Road to the east
The limitation on the height of the project ~and the proposed four-plex design ensure that the
proposal will not negatively impact the architectural character of the single-family neighborhood to
the west and south `There is no real evidence that the proposal would degrade property values in
the area, and it may serve to renew the older single-family neighborhood in ihe vicinity.
While three letters of opposition were submitted in regard to the proposal, on balance I find that
the proposal bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and general welfare Fill in
development such as the current proposal, served by a high level of urban services, is
recommended by the Urban category. The site will be connected to public sewer. The applicant
is willing to enter into a voluntary agreement with the local school district to pay school impact
fees Balfour Park, the nearest County park, is located less than a mile north of the site
University High School, with its considerable piayfield areas, is located less than a mile,to the
southwest The proposal will help provide affordable housing in the Spokane Valley area.
This letter opinion is subject to the entry of formal written findings, conclusions and decision,
consistent with this opinion The time for appeal will run from the daie such formal decision is
entered
Very truly yours,
~ C9
U
1Vlichael C. Dempsey
Spokane County Hearing Examiner
cc Louis Webster, Division of Building and Planning
John Ward, 13724 East 31'` Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
William Marchand, 10521 East 5t' Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206
Rudy Polich, 10611 East 6" Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206
Gregg Aichlmayer and Karen Von Tersch, 10509 East 5'h Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206