ZE-0048-97
, RECE VED
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER NOV 19 1997
SPOKA(VE COUMY ENOfNEER
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone to ) CONCLUSIONS
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone ) AND DECISION
Applicant: Steve Schmautz )
File No. ZE-48-97 )
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Zone reclassification from the Urban Residential-3.5 (tTR-3.5) zone to the Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions. The Hearing Examiner has added a condition
limiting the residential net density of the proposal for general multifamily housing to 14.5 units
per acre. The density of the proposal for retirement/elderly aparhnents is subject to the
maximum density allowed in the UR-22 zone of 22 units per acre. Convalescent home or
nursing home development is not subject to density requirements, since such uses are not
considered multifamily dwellings.
II. FINDYNGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions:
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: Steve Schmautz, 11320 North Kathy Drive, Spokane, WA 99218
Address: 721 and 729 South University, Spokane, Washington
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to University Road, south of and adjacent
to 7' Avenue, and north of and adjacent to 8' Avenue, in the NW `/a of Secrion 21, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Legal Description: Lots 7 and 8 in Block 4 of Old Orchards Subdivision, as per plat thereof
recorded in Volume 3 of plats, Page 11; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Spokane County by
deed recorded on November 15, 1990, under Auditor's File No. 9011150202; Situate in the
County of Spokane, State of Washington.
Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Urban category of the
Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The site is also within the Priority Sewer
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 1
Y
Service Area, Urban Impact Area and Aquifer Sensitive A.rea designated in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division
of Buitding and Planning on September 12, 1997.
Site Description: The site is approximately 1.32 acres (57,600 square feet) in size and is
relatively flat in topography, with a slight incline in slope from the south property line to the
north property line. A two-story house used as rentaZ housing is located in the middle of the
northerly portion of the site, and a one-story house used as a rental is found near the east border
of the northerly portion of the site. The southerly portion of the site is undeveloped with some
scattered trees, and is mostly separated from the northerly portion of the site by a four foot high
wire fence. The southerly portion was previously occupied by a single-family home, which has
been removed. There is an existing curb cut to 8th Avenue at the southeast corner of the site, and
an existing curb cut to University Road at the southwest corner of the northerly portion of the
site. The property is located within the Interim Urban Growth Area boundaries designated by
Spokane County under the Washington State Growth Management Act.
Surrounding Conditions: The site fronts along University Road, a four lane road
designated by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a Principal Arterial. The site also lies
directly between 8th Avenue, a Minor Arterial, and 7th Avenue, a Local Access Street. The
intersection of University Road and 8" Avenue is fully signalized. Curb, sidewalk and street
lighting are provided along both sides of University Road. Such improvements do not exist
along 7"' Avenue. Sidewalks are found along both sides of 8" Avenue west of the easterly
boundary of the site, and curbs are provided along 8"' Avenue east of University Road. Sprague
Avenue is located approximately one-half mile north of the site and comprises a major east-west
traffic and commercial corridor through the Spokane Valley area. The Spokane Transit
Authority Valiey Transit center is located at the northwest corner of University Road and Foui-th
Avenue. University High School is located about five blocks southwest of the site.
Single-family residences on lots zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) are found adjacent to or
across public streets from the site on the north, south and east. Duplexes on land zoned Urban
Residential-7 (UR-7) have recently been constructed west of the northerly portion of the site,
across University Road. The northwest corner of University Road and 8" Avenue is
undeveloped, and currentiy zoned UR-3.5. The southwest and southeast corners of such
intersection are improved with single-family residences on land zoned UR-3.5. A large
retirement center on land zoned UR-7 zone is found along 9th Avenue a few blocks south of
University Road, adjacent to Universiry High School. Some multifamily, nursing home and
office uses are found along University Road north of 6"' Avenue, on land zoned Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) or Neighborhood Business (B-1). Apartment complexes on land zoned
UR-22 are located about four blocks west of the site on the north side of 8' Avenue. See County
zoning maps in project file.
Project Description: The zone reclassification application for the project lists the proposed
use of the site as multifamily dwellings or assisted living (retirement housing). The site plan of
record does not show any particular use of the site, but illustrates access to 7`hAvenue through a
proposed curb cut at the northeast corner of the site, and access to 8" Avenue through an
existing curb cut at the southeast corner of the site. No access is shown to University Road, even
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 2
t
though there is an existing curb cut at such location. The site plan also illustrates sidewalks and
landscaping along the public streets fronting the site. The applicant testified at the public hearing
that he would consider developing either an assisted living type facility for the elderly or a
multifamily project, or possibly even duplexes. The Division of Building and Planning
conditions of approval recommend that the applicant limit building height to two stories and 35
feet, install a six foot high sight-obscuring fence and a ten foot wide strip of Type I landscaping
along the east property line, and that a public hearing be held before the Hearing Examiner on a
future site development plan prior to any site development. County Engineering conditions of
approval recommend that the applicant improve 7" Avenue along ihe frontage of the project by
adding asphalt, curb and sidewalk.
B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Zoning Code Chapters 14.402 and 14.622.
Hearing Date and Location: October 8, 1997, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: September 17, 1997 by applicant
Posted: September 12, 1997 by applicant
Published: September 23, 1997
Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met.
Site Visit: October 7, 1997
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure).
Testimony:
Francine Shaw and John Pederson Scott Engelhard
Division of Building and Planning Division of Engineering and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
Steve Schmautz Jane and Ray Sebert
11320 North Kathy Road 10719 East 8" Avenue
Spokane, WA 99218 Spokane, WA 99206
John Lilly Kurt Campbell
10714 East 8" Avenue 10714 East 8" Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206
Ken Hoffinan Robert and Gail Stroup
10719 East 7' Avenue 10720 East 7"' Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206
Don Rice
10715 East 7`hAvenue
Spokane, WA 99206
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 3
,
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code,
Spokane County Code, and County Resolution Nos. 96-0171, 96-0294 and 95-0498. Also
Spokane County zone reclassification decisions in ZE-17-96, ZE-8-96, ZE-13-93, ZE-4-90, ZE-
68-82, ZE-93-80 and ZE-22-62.
C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS:
In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that 1) there is
no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant foi the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridge v.
Seattle, 98 Wn. 2d 454, 462 (1978); Biarnson v. Kitsap Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840 (1995).
Section 14.402.020 of the Spokane Counfy Zoning Code indicates that consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, detriment to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant
when considering amendments to the Spokane County Zoning Map.
The proposed rezone must also be consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code, the
State Environmental Policy Act, the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, and other
applicable land use regulations. Conditions may be imposed to assure the consistency of the
proposal with applicable regulations.
The following findings of fact and conclusions are made:
l. The proposal, as conditioned, unerallv conforms with the Spokane Countv Generalized
Comnrehensive Plan.
a. Relevance of Comprehensive Plan
The Hearing Examiner is required to set forth in findings and conclusions the manner in
which a land use decision carries out and conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and other
development regulations. See RCW 36.70.970 (3); and Spokane County Resolution No. 96-
01717 Attachment "A", S ection 11.
A comprehensive plan serves as a guide to the adoption of zoning regulations and other
official controls, and smct adherence is not required. A comprehensive plan provides guidance
to the hearing body in making a rezone decision. Belcher v. Kitsap Countv, 60 Wn. App. 949,
953 (1991). In rezone matters, only general conformance with the comprehensive plan is
required. See RCW 36.70.340; Barrie v. Kitsap Countv, 93 Wn.2d 843, 848-49 (1980); Bassani
v. Countv Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, and Cathcart v, Snohomish Countv, 96 Wn.2d 201,
211-12 (1981).
If designated as a SEPA policy, a comprehensive plan can be relied on to condition or deny
a land use proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Spokane County Code
11.10.160 (4)(c) adopts the Comprehensive Flan, Zoning Code and other land use controls as
policies to be applied under SEPA and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance. Zoning
regulations will generally prevaii over inconsistent provisions in a comprehensive pIan (e.g.
allowable density, permitted uses). See Hansen v. Chelan Countv, 81 Wn. App 133,138 (1996);
Weverhaeuser v. Pierce Countu, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); Cougar Mt. Assocs. v. KinR Countv,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 4
111 Wn.2d 742, 755-57 (1988); Natzatani Bros. v. Commissioners, 108 Wn.2d 477, 480 (1987);
Wildner v. Winslow, 35 Wn. App. 77, 79-80 (1983); Norco Construction v. King Countv, 97
Wn 2d 680, 688-689 (1982).
Spokane County Zoning Code 14.100.104 states that the provisions of the Zoning Code
shall be interpreted so as to carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan and the general plans for physical development adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that it should be used as a reference
source and guide for making land use decisions. Comprehensive Plan, p. 2. The "decision
guidelines" set forth in each section of the Comprehensive Plan are to be used in determining
whether or not a particular proposal should be approved, conditioned or denied.
b. Aanlicable volicies '
The proposal is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban
category is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes
various land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban
services. It is primarily a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family, and
condominium buildings along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and
recreational facilities. The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of one (1)
to 17 units per acre, with allowances for "bonus densities" within developed areas where utilities,
arterials, schools, and community facilities have already been established. The more intensive
uses in the Urban category, such as light industrial and neighborhood commercial, would be
located near or along the heavily traveled streets. The least intensive single-family residential
uses should be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily structures will usually
be a transitional use located between single-family residential and the more intensive areas. See
Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed Definition".
The Urban category includes the following relevant goals, objectives and decision
guidelines:
Goal 1.1 Encourage a variety of housing types and densities.
Objective l.l.a Promote fill-in within established development areas and
existcng outlying communities where utilities, arterials, schools and
community facilities have already been established.
Deccsion Guideline 1.1.1 Urban development will be approved in areas
having adequate power supplies, water, sanitary and storm sewers,
streets, and school and fire services, provided that such development
meets the intent of other Objectives and Decision Guidelines of this
section.
Objective 1.1. b Higher-density developments such as multi family and
mobile homes (manufactured homes) parks should be located with direct
or near access to the major arterial systems rather than on interior
neighborhood streets. Access to pubic transportation should also be
considered.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 5
Ohjectlve l.l.c When multifamily dwelling are to be locatecl adjacent to
single famcly areas, carefut consideration must be given to the density antl
desigris of the multiple family development so as to ensure protection of
the amenities of the single family area.
Deccsion Guideline 1 1.2 Base net density for single family dwelling
areas and for multifarrrily dwelling areas may be increased through bonus
options, bonus densities, zero lot lines or similar inethods when meeting
the fill-in criteria.
Decision Guideline 1.1.3 A multifamily dwelling structure exceeding
three (3) residential units or a development of such structures or
manufactured homes (except those on single family lots) should:
a) locate adjacent descgnated arterials;
b) locate near existing or planned public transit routes;
c) improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single family
amenities.
Decision Guideline 1.1.4 A variety of densities and residential uses
should be available to provide a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas
with varying densities, combinations, or mix of uses (see detailed Urban
definitions).
Decision Guideline 1.1.6 Development utilizing construction methods,
site planning andlor landscaping methods which are considered
innovative should be approved if the intent of Plan Objectives or Decision
' Guidelines is maintained.
Decision Guidellne 1.2.2 The need for recreation and open space created
by residential developments should be met and be in conformance with
ordinances, plans, and policies prior to residential development approval.
Deccsion Gucdeline 1.3.3 All Urban development proposals should
require public sanitary and storm sewer systems or interim sewer systems
to protect wcrter qualiry.
Goal 1. S Encourage a healthful and pleasing environment in the
cou,iry's residential areas.
Objective 1. S, a New residential or multiple family should be buffered
from existing adjacent land uses where adverse effects may develop.
Decision Guideline 1.5.1 Buffering and/or landscaping will be used to
mitigate the dierertces between proposed developments and existing uses.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 6
Deccsaon Guidelane 1.54 Sidewalk facclities will be required along
arterials connecting residentaal areas with commuiiityfacilities and/or
commercial areas.
Objective 1. S. d Residential areas should be discouraged within high
noise level zones such as in the vicinity of airports, railroads and
fYeeways.
Objective 1. S. e When a necghborhood experiences pressure for change in
character, such change shall be permrtted upon appropriate review.
Objective l.S.f Consider the profile, especially height, of the existing
neaghborhood when evaluating multifamlly developments.
Objective 1. S.g In many instances, mobile homes and multifamily
development may be appropriate to renew residential areas.
Decision Guideline 1.5. 7 Before approving any multifamily housing or
manufactured home development proposals, it should be determined that
such development will enhance the residential character or aesthetics, or
will amprove rescdential values of the area.
Objective 1. S. 8 Wheri determining whether a proposal will change the
existing land use character of an area, factors to consider may include:
a) the structure height of the proposal in relation to structure
height of nearby structures, and
. b) whether new structures will have a positive or negative impact
p upon the neighborhood 's architectural character.
Decision Guideline 1.6.1 Before land use proposals are approved they
should.
a) conform to plar:s, policies and regulations of County water, sewer, storm sewer,
utility and special service districts;
b) conform to County transportation plans and policies; and
c) identify and take steps to resolve signiftcant adverse impacts upon existing
utilities, (i.e. water, sanitary and storm sewers, utility, available and future
energy resources), and traffic systems.
The property is also within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated by the Comprehensive
Plan. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 14. This is an area where growth, development and
higher intensities of land use are encouraged. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.a.
Traditional urban problems such as incompatible land uses, environmental pollution and traffic
congestion are to be managed with greater attention to the general public's well-being inside the
UTA. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.e.
Decision Guideline 21.1.9 of the Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan
indicates that residential neighborhoods should be designed to minimize direct access to
principal or minor arterials. Decision Guideline 21.4.5 and 21.5.7 recommend that the function
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 7
of existing and future arterials be preserved by controlling land uses, parking and direct access
along arterials. Decision Guideline 21.5.3 encourages land use planning that will minimize the
need for high capacity transportation comdors and encourage land uses in areas that can take
advantage of available capacity of existing arterial streets.
c. Consistencv of proposal with aoplicable policies
The site is currently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), which zone is intended to
promote areas of primarily single-family residential use in an urbanized setting. Zoning Code
14.616.100. The Urban category generally dissourages the development of single-family
residences along heavily traveled streets, such as University Road.
The applicant proposes to rezone the site from the UR-3.5 zone to the Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) zone, for development of an "assisted living facility" for the elderly or a multifamily
project. The UR-22 zone generally provides for residential densities up to 22 units per acre.
Under certain circumstances, the Zoning Code allows "bonus densities" in the UR-22 zone for
multifamily housing up to 27 dwelling units per acre. See Zoning Code Chapter 14.820. The
purpose and intent of the UR-22 zone is set forth in Zoning Code 14.622.100 as follows:
The purpose of the UR-22 zone is to set standards for the orderly
development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable
living environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and
ass:ires the protection of property values. It is intended that this zone be
used to add to the variety of housing types and densities, and as an
implementation tool for the Comprehensive Plan Urban Category. General
characteristics of these areas include paved roads, public sewer and water,
accessibility to schools and libraries, and a full line of public services
including manned fire protection and public tran.sit accessibility. Offices
are permitted in the UR-22 zone in order to provide some of the service
needs generated by hrgh-intensity land uses. The hit~hest densitv residential
zone. UR-22, is intended nrimarilv for multiple-familv dwellin-as and is
usuallv located adiacent to maior or secondarv arterials. It is used as a
transition between low or mediurri densitv multiple-familv uses and intensive
commercial or low intensitv industrial uses and to provide for hipher densitv
housin,a in locations close to emnlovment, shonping and maior
trans,vortation where movements of people can be handted effz'cientlV and
with least overall adverse impact.
[Emphasis added].
The proposal is located along significant arterials and has good access to public transit, as
recommended for multifamily development by the Urban category and the purpose and intent
section of the UR-22 zone. University Road is designated by the County Arterial Road Plan as a
Principal Arte,rial, and 8' Avenue is designated as a Minor Arterial. These are "major or
secondary arterials" as referenced in Zoning Code 14.622.100. See Comprehensive Plan,
Glossary, definitions of "secondary arterial" and "major arterial"; and Spokane County Standards
for Road and Sewer Construction (adopted by County Resolution No. 95-0498), p. 8, definitions
of "Principal Arterial", "Minor Arterial" and "Collector .Arterial". The site is located along a
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 8
c
public transit route and is within walking distance of the Spokane Transit Authority Valley
Transit Center at the intersection of University Road and 4"' Avenue. See Staff Report, p. 3.
The subject property is also located reasonably close to employment, shopping and the
major arterial systems, as recommended for multifamily development. Sprague Avenue, a major
commercial and transportation corridor in the Spokane Valley area, is located one-half mile north
of the site See Staff Report, Vicinity Map. The University City shopping mall is located at the
southwest corner of University and Sprague Avenue, and some office or low intensity
commercial uses are located along University Avenue noith of 6d' Avenue. The proposal is
located within a developed area, and will be served by a high level of public serviees, including
public sewer. Such "fill-in development" is encouraged in the Urban category. See
Comprehensive Plan, Glossary, definition of "fill-in development".
The Urban category recognizes that multifamily housing may serve to renew a residential
area, and indicates that when a neighborhood experiences pressure for change, such change may
be allowed upon appropriate review. The Urban category indicates that multifamily housing
should improve or maintain the amenities of adjacent single-family areas, with particular
attention given to the design and densities of multifamily development. The land uses adjacent
and near the site consist mainly of older but well-maintained single-family homes on lots zoned
UR-3.5, which are mostly single-story except for a two-story home located immediately east of
the site along 7"' Avenue.
A number of rezones from the UR-3.5 zone to more intensive zones have recently occurred
in the area. In 1993, a rezone was approved to the UR-7 zone, to allow the development of
duplexes on laild lying west of the site across University Road. See decision dated 6-25-93 in
File No. ZE-13-93. In 1996, the Hearing Examiner approved a rezone to the UR-7 zone, to allow
the expansion of an existing nursing home/convalescent home located a few blocks southwest of
the current site. See decision dated 5-13-96 in File No. ZE-8-96. In 1997, the Hearing Examiner
approved a rezone to the UR-22 zone, to allow development of 16 multifamily units on a 1.1 acre
site located a few blocks north of the site, along the west side of University Road. See decision
dated 2-10-97 in File No. ZE-17-96. In 1990, a site located at the northeast corner of University
Road and 4`h Avenue was rezoned to the B-1 zone for retail and office uses. See decision dated
3-23-90 in File No. ZE-4-90.
Other more intense uses and zones are found in the area. A nursing home on land zoned
UR-22 is found at the southwest comer of University Road and 4th Avenue. The Valley Transit
Center is found on land zoned UR-22 at the northwest comer of such intersection. An office use
is found on land zoned UR-22 along the east side of University Road, north of 6`" Avenue. A
Neighborhood Business (B-1) zone is located at the southeast corner of University Road and 4th
Avenue. Apartment complexes on land zoned UR-22 are found about four blocks west of the
site, along the north side of 8"' Avenue. A UR-22 zone is located at the southwest corner of
University Road and 14`hAvenue.
The proposal was opposed by surrounding property owners, who raised concerns over the
compatibility of the proposal with the adjacent single-family neighborhood, traffic impacts on
neighborhood streets, privacy, noise, odors, the character of renters, impacts on property values,
and lack of recreational opportunities for the future tenants of the proposal.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 9
,
Currently, there is very little traffic along 7" Avenue east of University Road. Eighth
Avenue carries more traffic, but is currently signed for a speed limit of 25 m.p.h. east of
University Road. Eighth Avenue is widened from a single lane between the southeast corner of
the site and University Road, to allow for right-turning traffic onto University Road. University
Road is a busy four lane arterial, carrying traffic from the residential areas lying south of Sprague
Avenue. University Road slopes down somewhat north of 8" Avenue.
The applicant testified that he would prefer not to provide direct access onto University
Road from the site, for safety reasons. Some residents expressed concern over the proposed
access to 8"' Avenue, due to the possibility of car Iights shining into their residences and the
safety of making a turn onto 8`'' Avenue so close to the intersection of 8' Avenue and University
Road. Residents along 7`'' Avenue expressed concern with increased traffic along 7`" Avenue,
particularly if traffic from the proposal used 7`h Avenue to travel to points east of the site.
It is difficult for the Hearing Examiner to evaluate the access points for the project without
a site development plan. The Examiner would prefer to require one access point to Univers2ty
Road, but only if traffic can safely enter and exit the site from such location. Left turns to and
from the site and University Road, or S' Avenue, do not appear to be optimal turning
movements. Access along 7"' Avenue is probably the safest option, but should not be the only
access or result in any significant increase in traffic east of the site. There is little basis to deny
the proposed rezone based on access or traffic issues. County Engineering did not recommend
any restrictions in access, and there is no traffic engineering evidence that the capacity or safety
of the road network in the vicinity will be significantly impacted by the proposal. Access,
circulation, parking and other design issues can best be evaluated at the site plan review hearing
required by the conditions of approval. The applicant is required by the conditions of approval to
install sidewalks along the frontage of the site with 7" Avenue, and sidewalks already exist along
the frontage of the site with 80' Avenue and University Road.
Traffic impacts from retirement housing are generally significantly less than from general
multifamily housing. Retirees or assisted living elderly are not regularly employed and do not
generate nearly as many peak hour vehicle trips as other multifamily residents. Considering the
dominance of single-family housing in the area and access issues faced by the proposal, some
limitation should be placed on the ma}cimum density of the proposal if developed for general
multifamily housing.
The land recently zoned UR-22 in ZE-17-96, located a few blocks northwest of the site,
was approved for 16 multifamily units on 1.1 acres, or about 14.5 units per acre. Half of the
proposed units in such project access directly onto University Road, while the other half access
adjoining neighborhood streets which provide access to University Road within a few blocks.
Such site is located closer to Sprague Avenue than the current site, and adjacent to a nursing
home zoned UR-22. However, the current 1.32 acre site is located at the intersection of two
arterials. Treating the sites as roughly comparable, the Examiner has limited the density of the
proposal if developed for general multifamily housing to 14.5 units per acre, which would allow
a maximum of 19 general multifamily units on the site. This is considerably less than the 28
units that could be allowed on the 1.32 acre site under the maximum of 22 units per acre allowed
in the UR-22 zone.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 10
Development of the site for retirement/elderly apartments would be limited only by the
maximum density aliowed in the UR-22 zone. Development of the site for a nursing home or
convalescent home is not subject to density restrictions of the zone, since such uses do not meet
the definition of multifamily dwellings. See definitions under Zoning Code 14.300.100. An
assisted living facility may compnse either retirement/elderly apartments (as self contained
dwelling units) or a nursing home/convalescent home, depending on the licensing requirements
for the facility and the level of care provided to the occupants of the facility.
The UR-22 zone authorizes a maximum building height of 50 feet. See Zoning Code
14.622.335. The Division of Building and Safety recommended that the proposal be conditioned
for a maximum of two stories not to exceed 35 feet in building height. The maximum building
height in the UR-3.5 zone is 35 feet. See Zoning Code 14.614.335. The westerly building on the
site is already two stories in height. The residence adjacent to the northerly portion of the site
along 7"' Avenue is two stories, with no windows located along the west side of the home (except
for the garage). While the home adjacent to the southerly portion of the site along 8"' Avenue is
single-story, and has windows oriented toward the west, the Examiner finds the story and height
limitation recommended by County staff to be sufficient. Issues such as the orientation of the
building to preserve the privacy of adjoining properties can be examined in more detail at the site
plan review hearing required for the proposal. The consistency of the design of the proposal
with the architectural character of the neighborhood is also best determinetl at the site plan
review hearing. The applicant has also indicated a willingness to work with neighboring
property owners to assure the construction of a project which is reasonably compatible with the
neighborhood.
There is not a sufficient basis in the record to conclude that the proposal will significantly
impact property values in the vicinity. Expert testimony of an appraisal nature is normally
needed to establish such arguments. Some of the negative aspects associated with the current
rental housing on the site may be eliminated by redevelopment of the property with new housing,
which would probably cater to a more select clientele. The record indicates that the structures on
the site were constructed in 1900, although the applicant testified that he had spent several
thousand dollars upgrading the developed portion of the site since acquiring it a few years ago.
See Staff Report, p. 4. The conditions of approval require ten (10) feet of Type I landscaping
(i.e. sight-obscuring screen) along the east border of the site, while the Zoning Code only
requires the installation of five (5) feet of Type III landscaping (i.e. see-through buffer). See
Zoning Code 14.806.040 (1) and 14.806.060. The six-foot-high sight-obscuring fence illustrated
along the east property line also buffers the site from the residences to the east. See Zoning Code
14.622.365. Twenty (20) feet of Type III landscaping is also required to be installed along the
frontage of the site with University Road, 7`h Avenue and 8' Avenue. See Zoning Code
14.806.040 (2). The UR-22 zone also has special requirements for the storage of refuse and other
items, and for guest parking. See Zoning Code 14.622.350, 14.622.355 and 14.622.360.
As conditioned, the proposal implements the policies of the Urban category for multifamily
development and other relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 11
2. Conditions in the area in which the pronertv is located have chanQed substantiallv since the
proaertv was last zoned.
ln applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County
Zvning Code Section 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. Countv
Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 3$9, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a
comprehensive plan. Biarnson v. K.itsap Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840, 846 (1995); Save Our Rural
Environment v Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983).
A number of changes have occurred in the area that support the rezone proposal. The last
zoning of the property may be considered as the original zoning of the property in 1950 under the
now expired County Zoning Ordinance, since the area-wide rezone that took place in Spokane
County under the Zoning Code in 1991 was based primarily on the Comprehensive Plan and not
the specific characteristics of the site. Such changed conditions include the extension of public
sewer to the area supportive of higher density housing, the widening of University Road south of
Sprague Avenue to four lanes, some rezoning and development in area for higher residential
densities, and increased growth in the Spokane Valley area.
3. The uroposed rezone, as conditioned, bears a substantial relationshia to and is not detrimental
to the public health. safetv and Reneral welfare.
Conformance to a comprehensive land use plan is relevant in determining whether a rezone
bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani, at 396-98. As noted, the proposal
generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.
Several residents in the vicinity objected to the proposal through testimony submitted at the
public hearing and/or through letters submitted to the record. The views of the community may
be given substantial weight in a rezone matter, but they are not controlling. Parkridee v. Seattle,
89 Wn.2d 454 (1976). Such views must also relate directly to the legal requirements applicable
to approval of the rezone proposal being considered, such as consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and applicable land use regulations, environmental impacts, and specific
impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. See CouRar Mt. Assocs. v. KinQ Countv, 111
Wn.2d 752, 756 (1988).
The Hearing Examiner does not find the concerns expressed as sufficient to warrant
rejection of the proposed rezone, under the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable
regulations. The proposal has been conditioned to mitigate its most obvious impacts, and
neighboring property owners will have an opportunity to comment at a later public hearing on
the site development plan submitted for the site. The Examiner also gives weight to the findings
and recommendation of the County Division of Building and Planning, which recommended
approvat of the project subject to the conditions indicated in the Staff Report.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 12
6
4. The proposal, as conditioned, comDlies with the nrovisions of the State Environmental
Policv Act and the Countv's Local Environ.mental Ordinance.
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met. No comments were received from public agencies requesting
withdrawal or alteration of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the project by
the Division of Building and Planning. The record indicates that the proposal as conditioned will
not have more tllan a moderate effect on the quality of the environment.
5. The Drovosal, as conditioned. comnlies with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-221 zone. the
Snokane Countv Zonine Code (SCZC). and annlicable land use reeulations.
The site plan submitted is very general and will be replaced later by a detailed site
development plan, which will be reviewed by public agencies and considered by the Hearing
Examiner at a public hearing. The proposal has been conditioned for compliance with applicable
regulations The Examiner has modified the conditions of approval to allow further evaluation of
the future acquisition area requirements imposed by County Engineering and the Division of
Building and Planning, as requested by the applicant regarding 8"' Avenue and University Road.
The Examiner has in the past modified such requirements where it is clear that the roadway is
already fully improved to County standards and it is unlikely that any further widening of the
road will be needed in the foreseeable future.
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a zone
reclassification is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies
specified below. Conditions added or significantly altered by the Hearing Examiner are
italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Heanng Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLAN1vING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies to the following real property: Lots 7, 8 and 9 of Old Orchard
Subdivision, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 11, records of the Spokane
County Auditor.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (LTR-22) zone and the Spokane
County Zoning Code, as anlended.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 13
,
4. The applicant shall submit a detailed site development plan prior to any site development,
which shall be processed as a change of conditions application under Section 14. 500. 040 of the
Spokane County Code and the Spokane County Hearcng Examiner Ordlnance, and revicewed by
the Hearing Examcner after a publec hearcng. The detailed scte plan presentecl at a subsequent
hearing must address the desegn, access and buffering issues cicscussed in the above deccseon ctnd
the condatcons of approval cmposecl by the Hearcng Examiner
5. Approval is required by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee of a
specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permits.
6. Direct light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary. 7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to
the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond for the project or other suitable guarantee prior to release of buiiding permits.
Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not
obscured or impaired.
8. A six (6) foot high sight-obscuring fence and a ten (10)-foot-wide strip of Type I
landscaping are required along the east property line, except that such sight-obscuring fence shall
be limited to three (3) feet within the front yard setback of 7'h and 8`h Avenue.
9. The maximum height of buildings and structures shall be limited to two stories and 35 feet.
10. The maximum residential density of the proposal for multi family dwellings is limited to
14.5 units per acre; provided, such restriction does not apply to the development of
retirement/elderly apartments vn the site as defined in the Spokane County Zoning Code, which
are subject to the maximum residential density allowed in the UR-22 zone. Density restrictions
do not apply to convalescent home/nursing home units. ?'his condition may be imposed as a deed
restrictiori at the time of site development.
11. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the
County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by
the Division of Building and Planning. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At Ieast 13.5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities, in addition to the existing andlor newly dedicated right-of-way along University
Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 0 feet of new dedication.
b. A strip of land varying from 7 to 10 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road
right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way
along 8`h Avenue. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 0 feet of new dedication.
c. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 14
d. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the
above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's
expense when roadway improvements are made. '
e. Tlle future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as
allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface
drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
f. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at
the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future
acquisition area.
46
g. The above future acquisition area requirements are subject to revision at the change
of conditions hearing required for review of the site development plan in Building and
Planning File No. ZE-48-97.
12. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property tegally described as is the subject of a land use actioa by
a Spokane County Hearing Examiner or Administrative Official on ,
imposing a variety of special development cooditions. File No. ZE48-97 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning.
13. Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels
shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee for
compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable local, state
and federal ordinances and development regulations, as arriended
14. A filed aviation easement satisfactory to the Spokane International Airport Board, Fairchild
Air Force Base and/or other air traffic control agency shall be provided prior to the Division of
Building and Planning sign-off on a building permit or prior to filing of any final plat.
15. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within
the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of
appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The
property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: . . . "
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 15
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and
access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement
of 7`'' Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 5-7 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage pian requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be
completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed wlth the
County Engineer.
10. The County A.rterial Road plan identifies University Road 100 foot Minor A.rterial. The
existing right of way width of 36.5 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order
to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 13.5 feet in width
along the University Road frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to University Road. This
conditioti is subject to review and modification at the future site development hearing required
by the Division of Burlding and Planning conditions specified above.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 16
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies 8th Avenue as a 80 foot Minor Arterial. The
existing right of way width varies from approximately 33 feet down to 30 feet and is not
consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is
recommended that a strip of property varying from 7-10 feet in width along the 8u' Avenue
frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Arterial Improvements are made to 8°i Avenue. Thas condition is subject to review and
modification at the future site development hearing required by the Division of Building and
Planncng conditcons specified above.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional .
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided.
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system is to be constructed.
Sewer connection permit is required.
2. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval.
3. Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance
of sewer connection permit.
4. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plail for Spokane County, as amended.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 17
DATED this 17th day of November, 1997.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXA,MINER
. ;MY.--4~ r-
Micael C. Dempsey, WSBA #82 ,X~
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
determination is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9)
indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the board of county commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision.
This decision was mailed by cei-tified mail to the Applicant on November 17, 1997.
DEPENDING ON WHICH APPEAL PERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGALLY
APPLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER DECEMBER 1,1997 OR
DECEMBER 5, 1997.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period
with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490. The file may be inspected
during normal worlang hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-48-97 Page 18
4;:,. r •
Y`
~led Fdc E . NGINEER' S REViEW SHELT
Date Fil«i
Date As Ba,itt plm- Rece;Yea
Date R~ ~~~ved REZONE FILE # ZE-0048-97 -9,7
Ncw Rnu,.i Stamdards 5-15-95 Mvlar ~ Compgninn File A+:
Hearing Datc: 10108/1997 H Time: 09:00 E{ Number: I Related Fife
Technical Revitw Date: 07/3I11997 1'R Time: 03:00 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Nwnber: TECH REVtEW #
Date Receivei: 07/2i/1497 Review Type: LaBe W - Bklg. Syu,rc Feei.
No. Lots: Na. Acres: 1.32
Project Name: UR-3.5 TO UR-22 ASS[STED I.IVLYG Rangc-Tawnship-Scction: 4425-21
Site Address: S 7TH/N 8T'HIE UIJIVERSITY PutcEL(S): (frst 20)
Applicant Name: SCHMAUTZ, STEVE 8t TRESA Phane (509) 624-1019 45212.1348
Applii:ant Address: 11320 N K.ATHY DR Phanc 2#1 (509) 467-8290
SPOKANE. WA 99218
Date ndidons Msiled:
I'load Zonr: No Water Source: 4 Sewrr Sowce: Schoal Uist: 356 Firr DLq: 1 PhonC Disi:
8illing Namc: Owner: SCHMAUTZ. STEVE & TRF.SA Engireer. RUllY F KITLAN
Acidrcss: Uwner Adclrets: 11320 N KATNY DR Compan}►:
SPOKANE. WA 99218 Addres.g: $623 N D1YlSION ST
SPQKANL WA 94208
Phone: Owncr Phone: (509) 624-1019 phune: (S(14) 467-1550
Fu:
Signed Name
Buildiag # 456-3675 / Ptanning # 456-2205 Contact: FRANC[NE SHAW
Date Submltted Description Initiab
07/3111997 DA'fE TECFINICALLY COMPLETE
DA7'E NOT TECHr1ICALLY COMPLETE
UA'1E PAY FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES REGEIVED CC}PY TO ACCOUNTING
FITIAi. PLAT F'EES COMPLETED AND GOPY TO ACCOUNTtNG
, I
NOTICE TO PUBL[C J NOTICE 'CO PUBLiC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - UR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
l~it ~/l In-0ut s2 In-Out #3
UES[GN DEVIAT[ON DATES IN-OUT
tn-ow pa Ns u~-a,: rb
I i BOND QUANTITIFS FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATE BONU RECEiVED BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
D.4TE BOND REL.EASE - DATL BOND RET)UCED l3nND BAI_ANCE
lirarung Date Decision Appraved ~Dcnied Cornimied Appcaled f3CC Approvai Ucnieci
Appxalcd ro Caurt Approved Danisci Continued Final Pmject Stutus
STAMPED MYL.4RS TO PERMIT TEC}I1VICIAN (SYL)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
~
. • y
CamctCd ENGINEER` S REVIEW SHEE'I'
Date Filed
Date As Built Plans Rexcivcd
Datc Road Plans Approvrd DR REZ4NE FILE # ZE-004$-97 -97
Ncw Road Standards 5-1:5-95 Myltir
Cnmpanion File
Rctateci File
Hc:aring Date: H Time: H Numter:
DESIGN Revitw Datc: 07J3111997 DR Timc: 03:00 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: DLSIGN REVIEW N
Date Rec:eiveci: 07121/1997 Review Type: Lar~e Lot ~ Bidg. Square Fcei:
No. L,ots: Na. Acres: 1.32
Project Name: UR-3.5 TO UR-22 ASSIS'I'ED LiY1NG Range.Tuwnship-Scccion: 44-25-21
Site Address: S 7'TH1N 8THlE UNNERSITY PARCEL(5): (first 20)
Applicant Ncunc: SCITNiAUTL. STEVE & TRESA Phone !l: (509) 6241019 45212.1348
Applicant Address: 11320 N KATIiY DR Phone 2A+ (SOg) 467-8290
SPQKANE WA 99218
Uxu Canditions Mailed:
FIc,ai Zone: No Water Saurce: 4 Sewer Suurce: Sc:hcxol Uisc: 356 Fire Disr: 1 Phone Dist:
Bilting Name: Owner. 5CHMAUTL, S7'EVE & TRESA Engineer: RUDY F KTTZAN
Adclress: OwnCr Address: 11320 N KATHY DR Campany:
SF'OKANE vi'A 99218 pddrem: 8623 N DIYISION ST
SPOKANE WA 99208
Pf10tlc: OWIICF PllUfiC: (SU9) 6241019 phuqe; (509) 467-I550
F8X:
Signcd Namc
Iiuilcling # 456-3575 / Planning # 456-2205 Cantact: FRANCINE SHAW
Date Submitted Descripdon Initial.s
DATE TECI-IMCALLY COMPLE'I'E
DATE NUT 'I'ECI-iNJCAI..LY COMPLETF,
DATE PAY TEES RECEIVED
DATE PR[ORtTY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTII+1G
FINAL PLt1T FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUN7'ING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TU PUALIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEUS TO BE SIGNED
!n-Out #l tcf-Out 02 In-Out 13
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-Ot1T
tn-oUL #4 It, out xs In-W 06
! ! BOND QUANTITIE.S FOR DRAINAGE I1'EM CALCtTLATED ~
DATE BOND RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE- BOHD Rr1_L;ASL• - D:1TC BONU REDtICED liC)ND BAI.ANCI;
Ffcaring Date Decision Appruvcd Ihiurd Coiwuurd /lppealed BCC Approved Dciuad
Appca}nd tn Court Approvod Dcnied Continued Final Project Status
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECTTNICIAN (SYL)
i i STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
.
• ' . ,
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
,
'i File#: ZE48-97 ~
~
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNiNG '
Sf"KAINE CXXJI*-Zn ~
HEARING DATE: October 8, 19~PROJECT PLANNER: Franane Shaw
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassificat,~.-)-~-,
Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 1.32 acres of land for those uses allowed in the U~ iDaii
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. No plans for development of the subject property have bee-.
submitted. However, the applicant has indicated proposed use may include assisted livinc;
facil'rties, muttifamily/apartment complexes or no,;sihiv a suhciivision for the creation of lots
single family residential development
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recui iiii iu►iUz) apNiuv~,
conditioned.
_ . . . . . . . . .
Project Data
Project Location: The address of the subject properties are Sou?l-
and 729 University Road. The site is generalk
located east of and adjacent to University Roa(::
south of and adjacent to 7th Avenue, and north .
adjacent to 8`" Avenue in the NW'/. of Sectic- ' Z I
Range 25 North, Range 44. E W M. Spokarl~-
Coun , Washin ton.
Parcel Numbers 45212.1348 and 45212 1349.
Owner: Steve and Tresa Schmautz,
11320 North Kathy Road, Spo~.ar,c: '41,lA
5Q9 624-1019
Contact: Steve Schmautz.
11320 North Kathy Road, Spokane, WA. 99218
509 624-1019
Comprehenaive Plan Desi nation: Urban
Zonin : Urban Residential-3.5 UR-3.5
ExisGng Land Use: Two single family residences are located on tax
parcel 45212.1348. Tax parcel 45212.1349 is
vacant and undevelo d.
Surroundin Zonin and Land Uses:
• North: The existing zone of properties located immediately
north of the subject site is Urban Residential-3_5
( UR-3. 5 ) Areas of land zoned Urban Residential-2.'
UR-22 are located in the vicini of the
ZE-4&97
Staft Report - October 8. 1997 Pubfic Hearmg
Paae 1 of 6
Y '
North cont: - specifically at the southwest and northwest corner of
, the intersection of Fourth Avenue and University
Road, and east of and adjacent to University Road ,
approximately 520-feet north bf the site. Existing land
. use north of the proposal is primarily medium density
_ single family residential.
• South: ' Properties located south of the proposal are zoned
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5) Existing land use
south of the subject property is primarily medium
density single family residential.
• East: Properties located east of the proposal are zoned
_ Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) Existing land use
east of the subject property is primarily medium
density single family residential.
West: - Properties located west of the proposal are primarily
- zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) except for a
- small area of land located immediately west of the
subject site across University Road which is zoned
- - Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Existing land use south
of the subJect property is primarily medium density
single family residential with two family (duplex)
development.
Known Land Use Proposals 'and The subject site is surrounded by platted propertes,
Recent Project Approvals in'the most of which were finalized in the 1950's. Several
Area of this Project proposals for zone reclassifications have been
approved in the area and include ZE-13-97 (UR-3 5
to UR-7), ZE-17-96 (UR-3.5 to UR-22), ZE-93-80C
, (UR-3 5 to UR-22) and ZE-22-62 (AS to UR-22)
Land Division Status: The subject property encompasses Lots 7, 8, and 9,
- Block 4 of Old Orchard Subdivision Old Orchard
Subdivision was finalized in 1954
Shoreline Designation: - Not appticable
Water Purveyor: - The subject property is located in Model Irrigation
- District No 18 Water service shall be coordinated
' through the Spokane County Director of Utilities in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan
for Spokane County Water service will be provided
from an existing public water system and shall be
approved by the State Department of Health The
use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited.
Sewage Disposal: - The site will be served by a public sewer system A
_ wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public
- Sewer System is to be constructed and will require
approval of sewer plans and specifications, and a
sewer connection permit
Fire Oistrict The proposal is located in Spokane County Fire
Protection District No 1. The Fire District has
indicated they have no objections to the proposed
zone reclassification
School District and nearest K-12 The proposal is located in the Central Valley School
schools: District The School Distnct was contacted and no
comments were received regarding this proposal
zE-as-s7
Staff Report - October 8, 1997 Public Heanng
Page 2 of 6
r
. ~
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The subject property is bound along the north
' property Ime by 7'hAvenue, along the south property .
- line by 8"' Avenue, and along the west property line
by University Road. The Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan identifies 7t" Avenue as a Local Access
- - i Road with a planned right of way width of 60 feet 81
Avenue is identified as a Minor Arterial with a planned
- right-of-way width of 80 feet and University Road is
' identified as a Principal Arterial with a planned nght-
- of-way width of 100 feet. In order to implement the
' - Artenal Road Plan the Spokane County Division of
Engineenng and Roads has requested that a strip of
land 13 5 feet in width be set aside along University
Road as a Future Acquisition Area (FAA), and a stnp
of land varying from 7 to 10 feet in width be set aside
along 8`" Avenue as a Future Acquisition Area (FAA).
Nearest Par_ks and Distance: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan
identifies Balfour Park as the nearest County park
- facility located to the proposal Balfour Park is
. , located approximately one (1) mile northwest of the
subject site. Dishman Hills park is located
approximately 1 Y4 mile west of the proposal.
Neighbor,hood Association: No neighborhood associations are known to exist in
' the area.
• This proposal is located inside the IUGA.
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA). Spokane
Transit Authority Route 22 provides service to the site. Also, the Valley Transit center is
located on the northwest corner of the intersection of 4`h Avenue and University Road.
GMAICritical Areas
Aquifer RecFiarge Area: The subject property is located within the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay
zoneand the Priority Sewer Service Area
(PSSA)
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Map for Fish and Wildlife
Habitat Areas
Floodplain: FIRM Maps indicate the subject property is
located m Zone C and outside 100 year
flood hazard areas
Geologically Hazardous Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County
- - Critical Areas Map for Geo-hazards.
Wetlands: None illustrated on the Spokane County
_ Critical Areas Wetland Maps
SEPA
0 DNS issued September 19, 1997
O Comment period ended October 6, 1997
❑ Appeal period ends 10 days after the date the
Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision are
signed by the Heanng Examiner.
ZE-48-97
Staff Report - October 8, 1997 Public Heanng
Page 3 of 6
Noticinq
Published. Spokesman Review on September 19, 1997.
Mailing and Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for mailing the Notice of Hearmg and site
posting was September 19, 1997. 1724 Comaliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete): July 17, 1997
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: July 31, 1997
Date Notice of Decision is Due: November 28, 1997
Reviewinq Aqencies
16 Agencies were notified on September 12, 1997 Comments were due September 24, 1997
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received Received Received
WA State Department of No Division of Engineenng Yes Sept 18,
Ecology and Roads 1997
Division of Utilities Yes July 31, 5pokane Regional Health Yes Sept. 22,
1997 District 1997
Spokane County Air Yes Sept 24, Division of Parks, No
Pollution Control Authority 1997 Recreation and Fair
Stormwater Utility ~ No ~ Boundary Review Board ~ No ~
Spokane Regional No Spokane Transit Authonty No
Transportation Council
WA State Department of No Long Range Planning Yes July
Transportation Division 30,1997
Fire Protection Yes July 29, Central Valley No
District No. 1 1997 School Distnct
Division of Engineering
Model Irngation District No and Roads/Development Yes Sept. 16,
Services 1997
Resaonses from the Public Eight letters and two telephone calls opposing the proposal were
received by the Division of Building and Planning which identified the following issues of concern:
• Lack of proposed use
• Traffic
• Impact on adjacent properties (height of structures, privacy, lower property values)
• Impact on schools
• Impact on existing residential development
• Noise
• Aesthetics
Description of the Site: The site is approximately 57,600 square feet (1.32 acres) in size and is
relatively flat in topography with a slight incline in slope from the south property line to the north
property line. Two single family dwelling units including landscaping are located on the north
portion of the site. Assessor's records indicate these residences were constructed in 1900. The
south portion of the site, specifically tax parcel 45212.1349, was once occupied by a single family
residence but the residence has been removed. This parcel is currently undeveloped, scattered
with trees and is separated from the north parcel by a four (4) foot tall wire fence. The subject
property is located on the northeast corner of the controlled intersection of 8' Avenue and
University Road. Primary access to the site is from 7' Avenue to the north and 8'h Avenue to the
ZE-48-97
Staff Report - October 8, 1997 Public Hearing
Page 4 of 6
1 {
south. Curb, sidewalk and street lighting are provided along University Road. No curb, sidewalk
or street lighting is available along 71' Avenue Curbs are provided along 80' Avenue. Overhead
transmission lines border the site along the west property line adjacent to University Road. Backqround• The application for the proposed zone reclassification was submitted by the
applicant to the Division of Building and Planning on July 17, 1997 and received Counter
Complete status. On July 31, 1997 a Technical Review Meeting was held where the applicant
was notified the proposal was Technically Complete.
Steve and Tresa Schmautz are the owners of tax parcel 45212.1348 and are under contract to
purchase tax parcel 45212.1349.
Staff Analvsis:
Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located in the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide a city-like environment which
includes various land use, intensive residential development, public facilities and services. Urban
areas will be the most intensely developed of all categories and is primarily a residential category
of single family, two-family, multifamily, and condominium buildings with residential net densities
ranging from 1 to 17 dwelling units per acre. The more intensive land uses such as light industrial
and neighborhood commercial will be located near heavily traveled streets, while the least
intensive uses will be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic. Multifamily structures will usually
be a transitional use between single family residential and the more intensive areas.
Urban areas will have public water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and
utility systems such as electrical, telephone, gas, and cable services. The proposal is generally
consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. (See Objectives 1 1.b, 1.1.c, 1.5.a and 1 5.f)
Zoning Analysis: The purpose of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set standards for
orderly devetopment of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living
environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property
values. It is the intent of this zone to be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities,
and as an implementation tool for the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. General
characteristics of these areas include paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to
schools and libraries, and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public
transit accessibility. The highest density residential zone, UR-22, is intended primarily for
multifamily dwellings and is usually located adjacent to major or secondary arterials. It is used as
transition between low and medium density multiple family uses and intensive commercial or low
intensity industrial uses and to provide for a higher density housing in locations close to
employment, shopping and major transportation routes where movements of people can be
handled efficiently and with the least overall adverse impacts
Site Development Plan Review: No site development plan has been submitted which identifies
proposed use of the site However, the applicant has indicated that site development may include
multifamily dwelling units or assisted living facilities for the elderly. Detailed review to determine
compliance with all Zoning Code regulations and conditions of approval is recommended to be
administrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage
ZE-48-97
Staff Report - October 8, 1997 Pubhc Heanng
Page 5 of 6
1 t Staff Recommendation: The proposai is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and
Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and can demonstrate
compliance with the development standards of the Urban Resrclential-22 (UR-22) zone: Issues of
concern voiced by owners of property located within the vicinity of the subject property can be
mitigated through development standards identified in the Spokane County Zoning Code and
other County Ordinances and regulations. Therefore, Division of Building and Planning
recommends approval, as conditioned.
Attachments:
A Vicinity Map
B Zoning Map
C. Comprehensive Land Use Plan
D. Site Development Plan
E Agency and Public Comments
F. Conditions of Approval
ZE-48-97
Staff Report - October 8, 1997 Public Heanng
Page 6 of 6
. ATTACHMENT A
VICINITY MAP
. ~ ~
Y ~
ZEm48=97 } < _ ' +
Vicinity Map
~
y
G C~ ~ ~ ry +y ~ ~ Q
~ E -I
• , ~ . .9 . ~ ~7
J
s • ~~'~~1~ ,
• r u ~
~ .
r` c"
_ ~
rY+~ a ~ ~ r N a ~vE
1► 0 ir
~ i
~ ~ ' ~ i~ j ~ ~ ~t ~ a ~ C ~ ~ • `•~t rUar ~ C
a
F i r e ~L. I
~ ~EL..1-9.95 ~
- - . _ .
~
~ ~ 1
is K , COt~NTY - }~O
o_
la
x; -S r-o-a
r4
~ ~IrILY+'.dUX EE f$ A l 4RO.~ D ~
n
_ - - - ~ ~ - 1~•,~ 3F+d
`~I~ r
~ P70 v P r ~ Av F- ~ F ou RTr~ r~v
. .1.,..~ ~
- - ~ ~ • , c17*. , cr.
u
~ ~ ~ • ~ • ~ ~ C7
~
;f
s R ~
7
tr,
k~2- 7 t-+ S ~ ~1 ~ 7 !-i
V 4 Lt Ti ~
~ /'r ~rr • •t,-• ~r r ~ ! r ' ~4 ~ . • " } f r 5 w ~ t J _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ * ~
T 9 r r+ ~ T s~ ~
= lC3 JOrH li0 7 H
; „ - = Il 7n ~
~ ~ : .,_s~' ~ ~ ~ { ' 7 r+ ~ ~r I i T ~1 '
~
~]+sS'L~UW~T'~"LC.
4
? ~ ~ ` ` • $~0~~
1 ~ ~ 1'ti1•33 f ~ 1 T~f ,
O ~ , f'f S+G~1'~ • «~C J XN.~ IQ , - , , - ~ r r, . . . . t ;
Lri.r1J ~
°
V)
.4 + ti
~T}'l. dd rs,-
~l~ ;4 ~ f ~ ~
k a •~`~y.! f r.^~~ 4r . .r -s a ,.`4~. 1~ t~~~ r-~ t~~.
~ ~ ~r-- r t fi ~ ~~t'_ • ~ ~ ~ ~ i • _ _
r .
. ~
ATT'ACHM ENT B
ZON,ING N1AP
,
. ~ 4
ZEm48mm97
Existing Zoning
{ ' + ~fr~~• `~A ^ t ~i~ v t , ~ ♦
_ _ Y ••'~~~.4 t L~ da~ 'j h1Z ~ ~(.'S~Y
• ~ r n +n~~ ~~:r 7.!,'u,,.~.~~ tt`,
V
2
I 2~O ~ ~ b ~p (Q,j' ,ia!Lf~'y'~~ei r~ r ,~,•,~.-•C ti
I ~ ~ T ~ ~ kr Q y • 4~' ~r~~~,
~
9
~ f ~^5
+1" .~vw;,.~t ~ f 't.ft Z S~ - i .
~j
~ ~ i +9~.~,~i. `~CS..K•F.1 ,'ti'~.r~8.~i IY ,
e ~ Y p~ ~,j,Z, f1n r~r~r F ' l~T.• a~ t~ .
y /"1 O ~ C[~~:.~'(1~• r ` _ ' ,y'' I: ~C,~a~•~, •r~• ~ ~
(3)
~ ( ~ ' r /`J }:_V `•,.f 7~ ~ N •~L "~~!y, %j'}' ~ ~ • ~ ~ - _
~~~f ~ / ` ~ j~~ M~ . ` f,~_,`.•' ~„r4~... " . - + ~ ~
' yyr- f7 Vr G y ~ L! t" ~ " `~x~ ~'L=~'Ja << "
F1FTN ~J• ~ ~ "~:'r'tZ=~• ti`• -0 ~~~1 ~2Lj1~" ,
~~T• ° zot,s ~ ' "y';`.~ b . ~y+ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ t "1 1 ^ ~ t r . .l v~ ~ i" ~ `J ~;i~..: 9i , ~~~,`S.i~' ~~••~~FC''•" ~ ~
~ A j (~,'~y ~ ~ 3 `9.~- ~-~.~Q , G;~ e~;,,- t' ' i . .
I I ~J' ~ , ~ - ~ 4 " ~ ~ n ~ ~ L: rS~`~ .
'q a ~ J a.T 7~ I' ~ ~ / l L 4 ~ j , r , ~ : .4 .
S~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ' ~.t~^^'~ ~'~r` ~+'T~' t~ w ~ ♦ .l K a ~w. `0.
~ 13 I! o Nt6 ~3~ '
~ ^ iJ 9 ~~JilS~. a ~`i. • \ ~ .^s '
2 n , y ~ CY
V /
( /Q ] 0~
~ L e .✓IlR,~ ' "~''r~2i : ' :h , ' r Q ~ , • .
r/7 ~x. ~ /o `S. ~ :~tZ %':at(.' i~}'ZZ' F:'i~~^ Z,- • , ?9
' ~ P~ ~ e!~ ` r~ ~ • / ~ + r`' ` • tt}` .j.~.~y}
il 14 ~ ~ ~ r ~ K ~b` ~(L) y~'/ i.e=2 1a~ :+.r' 3"~.ti: ~
' ~ 3 z ~ ~,.1 1 , .~:r.w• , .ti T• . , , ~ . 4
n /~y)(\~ ~ r•7C } ,j ~ . T' ° ' ~ 'r` ti:~'° ( 2, • -
L
fy~
`C~ ~\~y ~\91•~}♦ rt~~~S• ~ ~'V.~ I~~~/ ~r '
~
q ' . 1
~ 2z ~6 : ~ ~ ~ • ~~/.f.~_' °r'~-~ " ` A J3 '
Q ~ ~ - , I p~ , r v ~ , ro , , . a %~r~x ` -v ` ,u t j ,
4.30 V r 1 co,.~r l j r 3
` j~ ~ ~'l/ • t ~ ~ ; ~
' a 1g ~ % ~j y I ~ ~+1~ R • ' '
tP _ gFH
1
I
~/f A J
~~/~~~1: , r !V fP✓ J~• J J , ~ j'~E"~~ E/~+
i..S C.'S' 50
l N S~ I
~ w
00 . c t' 7 7 HA
7 76 , • 9 (o ° ,
~ ~ C
, ~ l
r8 B (D ± L,
sQ ~.---L ~
7
AR 3 ~
TA r 1 R v, I F ~ i '
~ ` • i~ ~ ~ `S 4 ~ 3 --{}-+I ~
4a• • f It ~ 7 ~ I (~pvl I I~ + 1
L
,3 ` • I
. '
.
ATTACHMENT C
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
. .
. ~
i
- ~ •
~
.4S n
P
Z
Use
.
Land
.
ornprehens* ~
~
_ 4 fuCL10
• z -
,
' , ~,r-- I.a~a' JI
a
µIS5%0 ,
c a 27
3te
nd
~
w
a, e! i t6 N'- '
n, r 11 0 .
,
tut ~ Q t _ ~
' • - ~
' ~ IJ 1 32 ~p • ; J~ ►
~
W ~
3 4
88 15 . 7 ~
, ► W _
Se pr►ng
o
.
31 -
~ g ; :heSter
~ + .
2 . , i
, ~ .
0
4
, ~ .
. ~
-
spring Oq41
o
, • . _
, • ACA ooo~ ~
ell •
~ " ,
/ ~ ~µt E ~
,
~
ATTACHMENT D
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ZE=48=97 - - - ~
Site Development Plan
,
,
~ EvisriNG Gvi2g CU7- gTH AVE. '
51 OC wVtl-W-
qi- v ~
~ i
sr-
~ . o Ci Y PPUr~r/ T I
i W ' ~
~r
C
~9n' I z
N 'eu5 riyG C u.e.3 V"
OD Cui m
I I 3 c/)
•I ~ i --I . ~ I~
~
I (o,SC t EC-N C 0 )cfNL F f 1 ~ rl + rl
G!
, L~ ~ I r•~~, I'
F L
IAO'
~
i ~
yosci) cu.e3 cuT
~
215~ ~ . I
StTE PC,a'V
• ~ ~1 1~L~.J. ~
7TH AVE.
~
S i TE n.ATA ToTnL- 57, boo -,,f
l~~, .,~;id'•., - ~~,uoo s ~
9~~F1 R - ."AS,1,0ST's.~.
FYiSrrI2 t=i~ F : i) R 3
NORTH 5
~R PosFn zati ~ ~ (jp- zZ
SCALE i /4" 10'
, ATTACHMENT E
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
~
OFFICE OF THE SPQKANE COUNTY £NGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TQ: Spo!cane County Planning Department% /
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: September 18, 1997
PROJECT: UR-3.5 50 UR-22 ASSISTED I,IVING _
FILE # : ZE-0048-97 / ( ) G~IVED
~,l.
'^`~<:`~E 1JQ~.JNirl Y
Hearing : 10/08/1997 @ 9: oo #1 S~p 2~ i991
Review Date: @ #
Sponsor/Applicant: STEVE & TRESA SCHMAUTZ
Section Township Range: 21-25-94
i ~r~ wvr:.i'.:t'ia !3;~;; r ~"VNiAJG
Planner: FRANCHINE SHAW w;Technical Review Date: (07/31/1997 @ 3:00)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of 7`h Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
6. All required imorovements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
CC AppliCant STEVE & TRESA SCHMRUTZ
Engineer/Surveyor RUBY KZTZa,I
~ . . Page 2 ` •
10/08/1997 07/31/1997
2E-0098-97
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
PPO W PIrk ~
10. The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road 100 foot hWmmr
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 36.5 feet is not
consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the
Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 13.5 feet
in width along the University Road frontage be set aside in reserve.
This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when
Arterial Improvements are made to University Road.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies 8th Avenue as a 80 foot Minor
Arterial. The existing right of way width varies from approximately 33
feet down to 30 feet and is not consistent with that specified in the
Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended
that a strip of property varying from 7-10 feet in width along the g`n
Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired
by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to g`h
Avenue.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
' •
r
r
s?OK,A,NE REGIONAL HEALTH D1SZ ,.1CT
EI~~VIROT~iIViENT~ HEA~.TH DIVISION
~~~~17'y Inter-office Corrununication_
A997 DATE: September 22, 1997
P0siYl's6L]
.r~
TO; ~ Fraricine Shaw, Seniar Plarner, Spokan~ County Building and Planning Division
F1~OIVI: Do~nald T T~Ynch, EHS II -EHD, SF~HD
~
~
SUBJECT: Froposed Zone Change: ZE-48-97 (Schmautz)
1. References:
a) Map af subaect, scale 1l4" = 10', bY Applicant, undated, received by this office September 16, 1997.
b} Reconnaissance Geoloaic Map of the West Half af the S,pokane Ouadranele. Washingtvn and Idaho,
A11a.n B. ~'rriggs, 1966.
Soil Survev, St)akane Cauntv, Washineton, Soil Conservativn Sezvice, U.S.D,A, March, 1968.
d) St)okane Countv. Washin-iton, Eflal~~erLIIe Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e} St)okane Countv Rules and Reaulations for Sewaee Dis-nosal Svstems, January 19, 1995.
f) Logs of water we11s in Range44E, Township 25N, Sections 16, 20, 21, 22, and 2$,
g) Map Spokane N.E. Quadre-ingle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2, Findings:
a} This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The praject is within Critical Water Supply Service Area 93 and wittun the sez-vice area of Model
Irrigation District 18. Water supply will be a puhlic system
C) The project is inside the Spokane County Cornprehezasive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
~'reneral ~ewer Service Axea, and inside the Privrity Sewer 5ervice Area recamnended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject ta approval of the Director flf Utilities, Spakane
County, pursuant ta County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. 'I`he topvgraphy and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individua1 an-site sewage disposal systems. The 1ot is of the
proper ditnensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system.
d} "L'he project lies in a relatively flat area east of University Road and not-tb of S", Avenue. Local
drainageways are insignifcant.
.
• .
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Servic., as Marble sandy loam with 0% to 8%
slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible contamination of
groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
f) Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section lf shows they are
from 80' to 250' deep and have static water levels varying from 50' to 172' below the surface. The
Model Irrigation District #18 has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon
completion of agreements with the proponent.
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: STEVE & TERESA SCHMAUTZ
11320 N KATHY RD
SPOKANE WA 99218 •
landuse Itrize-43-97(schmautz)pa
.
. ,
. .
To: FRANCINE SHAW, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Jim Red/Spokane County Utilities Date: 9/29197
Subject Conditions of Approval
Planning Action Number: ZE-0048-97 Type of Action: ZR UR-3.5 TO UR-22
Applicant: Steve Schmautz Legal Owner: Steve & Tresa Schmautz
11320 N KATHY DRIVE 11320 N KATHY DRIVE
SPOKANE WA 99218 SPOKANE WA 99218
Sewer Service:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer
connection permit is required
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only
those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and
facilities for review and approval
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer
connection permit.
SS22 Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by the Water
Resources Section.
Water Service: Model I.D.
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
RE LE iV E D
sPtaKHNE c~UNNTr
1SK 2 9 1997
ffIE8!0"1 CF- ~l;;; i;,il, ~:,N`l :,Lr%,14Ni1'11G
' 5094596828 APCA 442 P03 SEP 24 197 14:52
,
.
~ . .
~
i .
t - - -
SP4KANE CCUNTY
AlR POIIUTION
' CJCLEAR.,,cA~ ~
P K A Ne CONYROI AIITNORITY
~ O
WEST 1101 COtI£GE, SU a03 SP /s,NE. WA 99201 •(509) 455-4727 FaY (509) 459-6828
Date: ' ~ •
.
i'o: Mr. Jeff Forry
0 Mr. John PeAerson
Spokane Csaunty Division of Buildings & Plannfng
10261N, Broadway Ave.
Spokane, VEIA 99260
From: Mr. Charles E. :!ituder
Re: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR:
File No. ;!5~5~~~q-7 ~
/
ProPonentlPro1'amt Name:
C] lRepuest for Culmments on 1
❑~Comments on iHearinqs Examiner Public Meetinq on 1
Comments on IDetetmination of Nonsipnificance Issued on
~ ~
• ❑ jPre-ApplicatiorilDevelopment Conference on ~
The Spoksne Gounfy Air Pol/ution CoRttol Aufhonty (SCAPCA) vres fonrad undar the euihorify ot the 1967 Clesn A;r Act of Weshingtcn
(RCW). That Aci requited counties, like Spokene Counfy, fo ective(e locel sif polluUon cnnfrol egancies. To meet fhe reqvirements of
thet Rct, SCAPCA edopled regutatior►s fo ce►ntrol the emissrons ot err conter;,inents fiom sources within Spafcane County.
Poriions of Spokene County fell to meet I'edere/ hesKh standards tor perticvlote emissions (dust end smoke) and cerfion monoxide.
Numerous stralegies heve 6een impleme,-►fed to ieduce air po/lulion ernissicns so fhaf we cen improve eir qualify end meet heaJ(h
stendaids. •
FoJlowing is e list ot concemsrissues fhat, ivt e min/mum, need fo be addrsssed fot proposed projects. Additione/ comments mey tesvlt
eRet more de(eilsd inforrnetion of the ptoJeoil is supplied. SCAPCA errcovra9es proponents fo contact fheir offi'ces et 1101 Wsst Collegs,
Spokene, WA 89201 for edditional informe0on.
The following conditions are relevanv to proposed projeci.
• Harvesiing of tlmber creales silvicuttural debris. This debris musf be removed by methods oiher than buming
to ihe greaiest extent possible, If burning is the only desired disposaf inethod then it must be done in
accordance wifh alt applicable regulatfons, and conducled In a manner that minimiZes smoke related
nufsances and air poilulion lmpai;ts.
• SCAPCA Regulation l, Article V requires that a Notice of Construction and Applicalion for Approval be
submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to iha ccnstruciion, installaiion or eslabfishment of an air
pollution source. It is possible that the following air pollution sources may be present at the proposed
facility:
CI one or more fossil fuel (natural gas, propane, butane, diesel, fuel oil, or waste oil) or
wood burning hezit sources. Natural gaslpropane/butane burning boilers, heating
unJts, or hot water heaters with a total heat input of 2,000,000 Btus/hP are required to
apply for a Notlce Of Construction. other units are required to apply for a NOC when
the total heat input exceeds 400,000 Btuslhr. tn addition, additional requirements such
B~CoR+rr»AesWEVISED GENERAL GOMK#ENT6 00e
~ ~ Frrnttd Gn RloClM Yape✓
. 5094596928 ~PCA 442 P04 SEP 24 '97 14:53
as Low Nox burners and source testing may be required depending upon the size of •
the unit.
❑ One or more Stand by Generators. SCAPCA requires a Notice of Construction for a11
Stand by Generatori; that are rated greater than or equa{ to 500 mechanical horsepower
(375 Kilowatts).
• There are numerous businesses that are ai(owed in a commercial and industria( zoning that are air
poltution sources. Before any business is estabiished at the s(te, SCAPCA.sliau(d be contacted to
determine if a Notlce of Construction is required. A COFY Or THIS LETYER SHOULD BE GIVEN TO
EACH NEW TENANT.
• All air pollution regulstlons must te met,
• Air polfutlon regulations requlre ttizt dust emfssions during denolition, constructlon and excavaiion projecis be
controlled. This may requlre ihe use of water sptays, tarps, spcinklers or suspensfon of activity during ceriain
wea4her conditions. Naul roads sPiould be iresied and emissions from the iransfer of earihen material must be
conirolled as well as emissions tnom 211 oihec canstruction related activities,
- SCAPCA strongly recommends ttiet all iravefed suri2ces (i.e. ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads)
should be paved and kept clean tr.) minirnize emisslons.
• Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud trom unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces.
If tracking or sp111s occur on pavec:l surfaces, m,essures must be taken immediaiPly to ciean these surfaces.
• SCAPCA Regufation I, Article 1V may require regisiration wi►h this agency depending upon the type of
business that may be established at the site. An approv2d Notlce of Construction su~ces to meet this
requlrement.
• SCAPCA Regulalion I, Ariicle VI, and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV, address air polfution emission
standards. All emission standards must be mEt.
• Debris generated as a result of th(s project must be disposed of by means other ihan burning (i.e, consiruction
waste, vegetalive waste eic,),
• [7emolition and renovztion projec.ls musf comply wiih the requlremenis of CFR 40, Pact 61, Subpart M and
SCAPCA Regulation I, Article 1X. Inlent to Demolish iorms are av2ilable at the SCAPCA office.
• Depending upon ihe type ot buslr,ess or equipment esiablished on site, some objectionable odors may result -
from ihis project. SCAFCA's regUlations state ihat effedive control appatatus and measures must be used !o
reduce odors to a mininum.
• All solid fuel buming devices (firep(aces wood s►oves, pellet stoves, etc...} must comply with (ocal, state, and
federal rules and regulations. Fireplace emission siandaros go lnto effect January 1, 1997. New fireplaces
must be tesied and labeled in acctirdance w;th procedures and cr-iteria specified in the UBC Standard 31-2,
• If the proponent or anyone else has questions concerning ihe above, please contaci Charles E. Studer (509)
456-4727 ext. 107, April Mil(er ext, 105, or Kelle Vigeldnd ext. 106 at SCAPCA's office during the hours of 8:00
am & 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday.
Failure to meet SCAPCA reQulat/ons mav result in de/ays, closure and civll and/or criminal
sanctions.
CL!=AN AIR IS UP TO ALL OF US
FAGE 2
Shaw, Francine _ •
From: Hemmings, Biil
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 1997 9 20 AM
To: Pederson, John, Shaw, Francine; Hemmings, Bill
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott
Subject: RE ZE48-97 - Steve & Tresa Schmautz
I received a DNS on the above referenced project on Sept 15, 1997 The only comment I have is
that the standard drainage condition is not needed for this development since the submittals will
be reviewed under the building permit process.
From: Hemmmgs, Bill
Sent: Monday, July 21, 1997 2 50 PM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat, Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy, Engelhard, Scott
,
Subject: ZE48-97 - Steve 8 Tresa Schmautr
Importance: High
7/21 /97
I received the above referenced project application on July 21, 1997. The SCS Soils Map
identifies this area as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is
known to be accurate Therefore, since this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no
concept drainage plan is required We have no information that says there are any critical
areas on this site.
I consider this proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using the standard drainage condition
VC& ~fe~rr.xi.rqa
. t~i •~.5' f 7 +R k ~7T"~~
SEP 17 1997
.'•'J'•; ~ ~ i~
!"U„N~eINC
,
,r.
.
,
ATTACHMENT F
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
.
. .
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING .
1 All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies to the following real property: Lots 7, 8,and 9 of Old Orchard
Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 11;
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone and the Spokane
County Zoning Code, as amended.
4. A public hearing review by the Hearing Examiner is required prior to any site
development. The detailed site plan presented at a subsequent hearing must address
concerns raised at the public hearing and address conditions of approval imposed by the
Hearing Examiner.
5. Approval is required by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee of a
specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permits.
6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond for the project or other suitable guarantee prior to release of building
permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired.
8. A six (6) tall sight-obscuring fence and a ten (1)-foot-wide strip of Type I landscaping is
required along the east property line.
9. Maximum height of buildings and structures shall be limited to two stories and 35 feet.
10. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the
County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilities The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or
in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The notice should be recorded within the
same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following•
a At least 13.5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along
University Road. NOTE The County Engineer has required 0 feet of new
dedication.
b. A strip of land varying from7 to 10 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road
right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-
way along 8`h Avenue. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 0 feet of new
dedication.
~
. .
c. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. .
d No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
e. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be
used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping,
parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim
uses.
f. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements
at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said
future acquisition area.
11. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The
Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and
shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use
action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner or Administrative Official on [
imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-48-97 is
available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building
and Planning.
12. Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels
shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee for
compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable local,
state and federal ordinances and development regulations, as amended
13. A filed aviation easement satisfactory to the Spokane International Airport Board, Fairchild
Air Force Base and/or other air traffic control agency shall be provided prior to the Division
of Building and Planning sign-off on a building permit or prior to filing of any final plat.
14. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within
the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing
of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of
the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay
Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as
follows: . . . "
.
Ci -1
~
2,ey~
~
~
W" -
~
A A*.A
.
I~,,~-~'"~ ; - • .
. .-G~
. ~ .
- ~ ~
~ ✓
OL-
~
C)'l~ . ~ ~
,
. /
IN
~
?
~ .
~ ~ ~l
~ 0~/ . ~
, ~
.
_ f dArk-/
~ y tS
r
~ ' t/ '
~ `'^~Y'~
~ ~ ~
i~ i~~ ~ C
~
~
o~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ , ~
~ ~
L~ ~
1
~ . , .
1
.
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TQ: Spokane County Planning Department%
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads 16~
DATE: September 18, 1997
PROJECT: UR-3.5 50 UR-22 ASSISTED LIVING
FILE ZE-0048-97 /
Hearing: 10/08/1997 @ 9:00 #1
Review Date: @ #
Sponsor/Applicant: STEVE & TRESA SCHMAUTZ
Section Township Range: 21-25-44
Planner: FRANCHINE SHAW
Technical Review Date: (07/31/1997 @ 3:00)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of 7`h Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
6. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
CC: Applicant STEVE & TRESA SCHMAUTZ
Engineer/Surveyor RUBY KITZAN
1
P Page 2 10/08/1997 07/31/1997
ZE-0048-97
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. Al1
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
10. The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road 100 foot Minor
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 36.5 feet is not
consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the
Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 13.5 feet
in width along the University Road frontage be set aside in reserve.
This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when
Arterial Improvements are made to University Road.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies 8th Avenue as a 80 foot Minor
Arterial. The existing right of way width varies from approximately 33
feet down to 30 feet and is not consistent with that specified in the
Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended
that a strip of property varying f rom 7-10 f eet in width along the gth
Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired
by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to 8t''
Avenue.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
L
3
• Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 1997 9:19 AM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine, Hemmings, Bill
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy, Engelhard, Scott
Subject: RE. ZE-48-97 - Steve & Tresa Schmautz
Importance: High
I received a DNS on the above referenced project on Sept 15, 1997. The only comment I have is that the
standard drainage condition is not needed for this development since the submittals will be reviewed under the
building permit process.
From: Hemmings, Bdl
Sent: Monday, Jufy 21, 1997 2 50 PM
To: Pederson, John, Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat, Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy, Engelhard, Scott
Subject: ZE-48-97 - Steve & Tresa Schmautr
Importance: High
7/21 /97
I received the above referenced project application on July 21, 1997. The SCS Soils Map identifies this area
as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate. Therefore, since
this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is required We have no
information that says there are any critical areas on this site
I consider this proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using the standard drainage condition
~l ~e~rc.xt.rya
Page 1
~
'
• •
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" DR-PLATS
TO: Spokane County Building and Pl ' g 1~ ent I
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
LVJ-
DATE: July 31, 1997
PROJECT: UR-3.5 50 UR-22 ASSISTED LIVING
FILE ZE-0048-97 / )
Hearing Date: @ #
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant: STEVE & TRESA SCHMAUTZ
Section Township Range: 21-25-44
Planner: FRANCHINE SHAW
Design/Review Date: (07/31/1997 @ 3:00) ,
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design
Review Meeting
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of 7th Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
CC: Applicant STEVE & TRESA SCHMAUTZ
Engineer/Surveyor ROBY KITZAN
r
~ ,
Page 2 07/31/1997
ZE-0048-97 '
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
10. The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road 100 fo~t Mino
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 36.5 feet
consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the
Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property ~3.5 feet
in width along the University Road frontage be set aside in erve.
This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when
Arterial Improvements are made to University Road.
The County Arterial Road plan identifies 8th Avenue as a 80 foot Minor
Ql)lArterial. The existing right of way width varies from approximately 33
feet down to 30 feet and is not consistent with that specified in the
Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended
that a strip of property varying f rom 7-10 f eet in width along the g`h
Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired
by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to g`h
Avenue.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
• v
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bili
Sent: Monday, July 21, 1997 2 50 PM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat, Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott
Subject: ZE-48-97 - Steve & Tresa Schmautz
Importance: High
7/21 /97
I received the above referenced project application on July 21, 1997 The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as
being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate. Therefore, since this is
an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is required. We have no information that says
there are any critical areas on this site
I consider this proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using the standard drainage condition
OW qe.,im&g d
Page 1
. PAGE 1 ~ 11:40:48 22 JUL 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05012 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00.000 DISHMAN-MICA RD & SC U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY RD 00.030 35TH AV (STAR.T) U 14 PAVED 54
00.130 33RD AV (START) & RA U 14 PAVED 54
00.220 32ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.280 31 S T AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.340 30TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.390 RAYMOND CL (END) U 14 PAVED 54
00.400 29TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.470 28TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.530 27TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.590 26TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.650 25TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.720 24TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.780 23RD AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.840 22ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.920 21ST AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00.970 20TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.030 19TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.090 18TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.220 16TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.280 15TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.290 15TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.350 14TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.420 13TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.470 12 TH AV ( S TAR.T ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.520 11TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.580 lOTH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.600 lOTH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.660 9 TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.740 8TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.780 7 TH AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.820 6TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.840 6TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01.980 4TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
02.060 3RD AVE (START) U 14 PAVED 54
02.230 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 52
02.300 RIVERSIDE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 52
02.360 MAIN AV U 14 PAVED 52
02.480 VALLEYWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.630 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 14 PAVED 20
02.650 SPRINGFIELD AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
02.730 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.980 BOONE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.020 SHARP AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03.070 SINTO AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03.130 MAXWELL AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.140 MAXWELL AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03.240 MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 20
03.310 AUGUSTA AV & CT (STA U 19 GR.AVEL 22
03.370 NORA AV (START) U 19 PAVED 32
UNIVERSITY RD (END) 03.390 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
05013 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00.000 SOUTH END TO MONTGOM U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD 00.170 MONTGOMERY U 16 PAVED 20
00.300 BUCKEYE AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20
00.370 GR.ACE AV ( START ) U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD (END) 00.440 FAIRVIEW AVE (START) U 16 PAVED 20
PAGE 1 ~ - 11:40:59 22 JUL 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05865 8TH AV (START) 00.000 HAVANA ST (START) & U 16 PAVED 20
STH AV 00.120 DEARBORN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
00.240 CUSTER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
00.343 WILLAMETTE U 16 PAVED 20
00.370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
00.510 CARNAHAN RD U 16 PAVED 20
00.690 MCKINNON RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
00.870 WOODLAWN DR (START) U 16 PAVED 20
00.990 FANCHER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
01.080 6TH AV (START) U 16 PAVED 22
01.120 DICKEY ST (END) U 16 PAVED 22
01.240 EASTERN RD U 16 PAVED 20
01.370 DOLLAR RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.510 THIERMAN ST U 16 PAVED 20
01.550 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.630 BR.ADLEY RD U 16 PAVED 20
01.740 COLEMAN RD ( END ) U 16 PAVED 20
01.760 COLEMAN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
01.860 GIRARD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.870 GIR.ARD RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
02.000 PARK RD U 19 PAVED 32
02.050 EDGERTON RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 32
8TH AV (END) 02.080 EAST END OF ROAD
05866 8TH AV (START) 00.000 DISHMAN-MICA RD & DI U 16 PAVED 44
8TH AV 00.140 FARR RD U 16 PAVED 44
00.210 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 16 PAVED 36
00.270 WOODRUFF RD U 16 PAVED 36
00.340 WALNUT RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24
00.410 HER.ALD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24
00.520 FELTS RD U 16 PAVED 24
00.640 R.AYMOND RD ( END ) U 16 PAVED 24
8TH AVE 00.660 HARMONY RD U 16 PAVED 24
8TH AV 00.710 OBERLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24
00.770 UNIVERSITY RD U 16 PAVED 24
00.920 GLENN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
01.040 PIERCE RD U 16 PAVED 22
01.280 BOWDISH RD U 16 PAVED 20
01.530 UNION RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.660 ROBIE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.780 SR 27 (PINES) U 16 PAVED 20
01.920 HOUK RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
01.960 HOUK RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
01.980 COLLINS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
02.020 VERCLER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20
02.050 VERCLER RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
02.130 VIRGINIA ST (START) U 16 PAVED 22
02.180 WOODLAWN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
02.220 MORROW RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
02.310 MCDONALD RD U 16 PAVED 22
02.430 CLINTON RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
02.560 BLAKE RD (START) U 16 PAVED 30
02.590 BLAKE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 30
02.720 MAMER RD U 16 PAVED 22
02.810 EVERGREEN RD U 16 PAVED 22
02.970 BANNEN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.030 BEST RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
PAGE 2 •11:41:01 22 JUL 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
03.090 REES RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
STH AVE 03.160 CALVIN ST U 16 PAVED 22
8TH AV 03.220 WARREN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 32
03.320 ADAMS RD U 16 PAVED 22
03.350 MARCUS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.410 MA2I GOLD RD (END ) U 16 PAVED 22
03.470 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
03.570 PROGRESS RD U 16 PAVED 22
03.670 ST CHARLES ST U 16 PAVED 22
8TH AV (END) 03.820 SULLIVAN RD
0 5 8 6 8 8 TH AV ( START ) 00.000 LONG RD ( START ) U 19 GR.AVEL 14
STH AV 00.500 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.010 HODGES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.210 COLONIAL DR (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01.330 GLENBROOK ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18
8 TH AV ( END ) 01.510 HENRY RD
05867 8TH AV (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
8TH AV (END) 00.160 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05869 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00.000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 GR.AVEL 12
00.020 MCKINZIE RD (LIBERTY R 09 GR.AVEL 12
00.150 GARRY RD (LIBERTY LA R 09 GRAVEL 18
5 Records Processed
,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COtJNTY HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS I'OLLOWS:
Application: File No. ZE-48-97, Application to rezone 1.32 acres from Urban Residential-3.5 to Urban
Residential-22, for those uses allowed within Urban Residential-22 zone.
Hearing Date and Time: October 8, 1997 9:00 a.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Applicant/Owner: Steve & Teresa Schmautz, 11320 N. Kathy Rd., Spokane, WA. 99218, (509) 624-
1019
Acldress and Location: 721 & 729 S. University Road, generally located east of and adjacent to
University Road, north of and adjacent to 7`h Avenue, and south of and adjacent to 8"' Avenue.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban.
Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-3.5.
Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the County Division
of Building and Planning, as the lead agency. The official comment period ends 10-6-97.
Deadline for submitting SEPA Appeal: [note: only applies to administrative appeals to the Hearing
Examiner, not to initial applications such as rezones or preliminary plats]
Related Permits: None
Division of Building & Planning Staff: Francine Shaw, (509) 456-3675
HEARYNG EXAMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to
persons with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning, ls` Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays.
Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or
special needs, please call the Division at (509) 456-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: Francine Shaw, ZE-
43-97. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3"
Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260-0245.
. ,
. ;
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIR4NMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-48-97
DESCItIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 1.32 acres of land for those uses allowed in
the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Steve and Teresa Schmautz
11320 N. Kathy Road
Spolcane, WA. 99218
(509) 624-1019
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located east of and adjacent to University Road, north of
and adjacent to 7t>> Avenue, and south of and adjacent to $th Avenue in the NE '/4 of Section 2 l,
Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C,030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Tllis
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be
submittecl no later than 4:00 P.m., Oetober 6, 1997, if they are intended to alter the DNS.
All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
By: Francine Shaw Title: Senior Planner
Phone: (509) 456-3675
Adclress: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 -
,
DATE ISSUED: 1997 SIGNATURE:
COMMENT'S REGARDING ENVIRONMIINTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE G.
APPEAL OF THIS DETEItMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COLTNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West
1026 Broadway, SpQkane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the
signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the
appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of
Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper
3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
4. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski
7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
8. Spokane County Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
9. Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glenn Miles
10. Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
11. WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
12. Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
13. Fire Protection District No. 1
14. Central Valley School District IVo. 356
15. Model Irrigation District No. 18
. .
~ . t
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~'r ~ I ~ '1 ~ ~-i..
~ V
~UBIE CM
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
SPOKAME ENYIROtMENTAL QADiMANCE
(MAC 191-11-9601 Settion 11.10.230({)
Enviromtr.ncal Checkllst
F 1 1 e NO zl r~~(,
Purpose of Chetkllst
The State Enrironoencal Po1/cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCV, requfres ail govermoental a9encles to tonslder the envfronmental iaoacts of a oroDasal
before i.aking (lecisions. An Enrironaental lmpeCt Stntef+ent (E15) must be prepareC for all prooosals rith probable signtficant adverse impacts on
the Quality of the enviro m+ent. The purpose of thls Checkllst 15 to provide information to helo you end the agency identify impects fron your
propaial (and to reGuce or avoid tnVects from the proposal, 1f it can De done) and to he10 the aqenCy Cetide rhether an E15 is reQuired.
lnstructions for Applicants
This environocntal checklist asks you to descrlbc soae bastc tnfo►matton abaut your proposal. Goverrxoental agenties use thit Checklist to detern+ine
rhetl+er the enrironoental impacts of your proposal are stgniflcant, redufring preoerat9on of an EIS. Answer the Queitions briefly, vith the most
pretise infornation knw n, or glve the Dest descrlptlon yw can.
'fou must ansrer each Questton atturately and carefully. to the best ol your kn w ledge. 1n toost Cases, yw ShoulC be able to ansver the Quescions
froA your ovm observations or project plans rlthout the need to hire txDerts. It you really do not know the anSyer, or 1f e question doeS nOt apply
to your proposal. write 'do not know' or 'does not aDp1Y•' Ca*Clete ansrers to the Questlons nar aay avotd unneteszery delays later
Socne questtons ask aDout governwental requlatlons, such as zoning, shorelfnt, and landmark OesSqnatfons. Ansver theze puestlons if you can If you
have probleos, the govermental agenctes can essist you.
The CheCkl{SC Questlons 8pply t0 &il petti Of y0ur DroDOSati, even 1f ypu Olan t0 do theie over • peri0d Of tfine or on d1/lerent oerteli of land
AttacA any edditionat tnforn►+t1on that will Eescrlbe your proposa) or tts envlronnrntal effeCts. The agenty to vhttn yau submlt th11 checkllst nay
ask you to explain your ansvers or provfde addittonel lnfonaation ressonebly related to detemtning 1f there rtu y be slgniflcant adverse imoact
Use of chectitst for nonpro,ject proposali.
Camplete thii checlclist for nonpro}ect proposals, even though puestions may be ansvere0 'Ex s not aooly'
1N ADOlTION, CaAOiete the SUPPIE?1ENTAL SHEET iQR NONPROJECT ALTIONS(Part D). ,
ior nonDro,}ett ettSoni. the re(ennces {n the Chetkttst to the w*ES 'Oro3eti,` 'aDplicant.- and 'DroDerty or sfte' Should De read ai 'proposal,'
•proposer.' and 'aftecteE 9eographtc area,' resDectlvely.
A. BALKGROU?ID
1. '1aAe of prCposed pro}ett, ii e90liCaDle.
-1-7_
z. %..e of Aoo,icant• sr~~ ~Tge~ ScNrvtwLV
7. 1kddress •nd phone numoer of applicant or contact person ~1 :~Ze~ • JPlMA2- ali ~
1~6~ ye7 -~~o
4. Oate Checkllst prepared• TI/yl% ~-J~- ~ 19 q• 1 - ~
5. AqenCy requestir►q CheCklift• S¢.11,~ ~Id,Lll~~ 1%i\~t~"7i~)n (7 l ~~~,~~~~~,i
~~QQ
6. ProposeA tfning or sthedule (lntludtnq pnasirtg, 1t sp0lttable)
~
7. a, oo you nave any plons for future addttions. ezpenslon, er further atttrlty rele:ed to or com ected vith this proposal' it yes, explain
tucvvtST,~Zv C- r g 0 ..i MAJ VV-L,, -
b. Do you ovn or have opNons On land neerDy or adiacent to tMs proposal' lf yes, eiplstn. Yes ~UfG~x-c - ~~~IM~
W ~ C> LA) t- ~ ~ ~d~ r,4~ f~ mi rs_. L o ~d D,.
STtt Atfr.~.
J
8. L1st enr environmental fnfornetion you knov nbout that has been prepared, or rSll be prepared. dlrtctly related Co this proposat
Ua (AnJo►6rP GA . .
arv.z/1iee t
. ' ~
~ 9POTJJTL LVv1RON`E`r*4 ORDINAt1CFt
(:AC 197-1]-9N:) SeccSOn li 10 .30(!)
k BACICG30t1:M (conc inuec' )
9 Oo vou kc+w vnetler •pplteacioru •fe :)ending (or govecrusen[el apqrovals ot o[tvr pfono+ilS _trettlv a'`et::iv •1e ptopa[cr CevereO 1.3v your
propo.11' ~ /re eYpta1^
I V O
10 Liec anq govetnoeat approvale or permica chac vt ll be needed foc your proposal, t' lonorn _RU' Lb I/f
F:v TO_iLF`
► VPr('r?)nrr f 'lon a~''r'M
f~~ Y:rYr; ~~1 ~
, - - ~ - l~
It Clve ot brtef, ecoplere descriptlon of rour proposal, tneludlag el+e Dtoposed use• and the si:e ot Che project and st:e "ticre are several
aveetlocu Lcer tn th!• checkltsc C►uc aat you co de+crlbe certaln •epects ot va+r Droposal Y w do noc neaG ;o rcp u cthose anevers an chle
pege
TW t►~- Gti r mvJ✓x ! S {n Sh _T Gm. UVAA/y
5,.~- T
` 1 S t s ~
~ - .
i.c o(
Ct o r sTt-Q L1 0 1 N
' ' ~tn~s 7►~.~ ~c~ rc G~. S c~'` -
J ~
laeatlon of :'ie propoea! Cive •u[(tclenc ln(orsacton tot a person to understsnd tne prec:Se lo u t:*n n: "nul ?toposec p-c ec:, :ud:-if a
e[reet address. anv, ind setcioe, tavruitlp •nd range, lf kr+ovn [f a proposal voucG octut ovet a rar3e area ?ro~'~t ihe -anze ar
boundatlea ot :ne stte(&) Provlde a legal deotriptton, mite plan, vle:nltv ma9. •nd •o~ograoRSC =A;, 'essonabl avat.az.e -ti'.e ~ov
ehould subisii an+ p:an• requlred bv ehe •geac/, you act noC teQUired to Evpilcate mApo or Ge:a:ied plans w Ocat;:e: vtth an% a;)v E:itinn
reLted to chls cl~ecklist
-1:T"~___Z-~ (Inl I 1LFIZ.&.! r_y
fZt= !l/V ± ~ p-s JT Y -7
Does ;ne provoee_ aetion lte v1:11n tne AQuS`er Serxslcive kres (ASA)' -he Gener+l iever Sesv:ec Aree' '-c Scve• Se' ^:e k:es, 'Ae
C't, o( Spokane' 'See 59o1cartr Cou-%ty'c ASA OverlAv Zone kc:ao `or `wundaries)
~,i4 ~p r►~ st w G~_P SC-2 U 1 G(Ar IZ t-''A
'0 BE COMFL.L"7LD ST AP4l.iCAN'
9 ~ L RO "r`L°'Q'"..AL PL"~: tf 5
=vslua:'o^ 'o.'
~gencv _ae
. E AP'Sl
a General descrlpclon of tt.e 61te (clrele one)ftLt,>LlSng, hllly, etee0 stopes, aounta:nwe,
other ~
b `^tac la the eceepeet slope on che •ite ;approztaete peccent
Ool
64-
e 'rhat enerel :/pes of eotls •re found on ttAe stte (for exanple, elay ~~nd,,,yCAXAL~. peat, Muckl'
If vou itnov the claeelElcsilon ot a ilcultural solle, opetffv tltieo anv prla' `anland
g FS
d kre thete aurfaee SnCieetiorsa ot hletorv of unetable soiis !n ;he l=ediate %teintcv' sn,
descctbe
! Y ~
. ~ ~
SPOKAN£ ENVIaONMENTA~ QaDIN1lHCE ~
(uAC 197-II-960) Sectlon 11 10.230(1) 8. ENYIROMtENTAL ELEMEKTS(continuedl
Evaluatton For
Agency Use Only
e Oescrlbe tne quroose, cyqe, and epp►vximate puantities of any f1111ng or grading proposea
Indicate source of f111,
nlu 7 Sv2r ~ F /V~ C~D~= lJ •
f Could erosion o a ur as a result of clearinq. constructton, or use' If so, qenerally descrlbe.
o7 ~l Pf'C.~SI Cl`~ l~Jl
(V
~ ~ ~
~1!-'C,(.~i~
f~? ~ t;JC! l1 Ly ) S~.
q. About what Oercent of the slte will be covered with impervlous surfaces efter projett Construc-
tion (for exar.iole, asDhalt or outldin9s)'
G' L5 nm~- de c ~ r,,. 5
~
h. Proposed measures to redute or Controi eroslon. or other impacts to the tsrth, tf any rx
T C,~- r ) n or i n ~ .
-~r~
2 . A { A ~C ~ y--~
a Whet type of g.issions to the a1r rou1C result irom the 9ra0osal (I.e., dust, automobtle, o0ors
inaustrial, wood smoke) Curing Constructlon and wnen the project ts conoleted' If enY,
generally deSCriDe end give aoDroximate quenttces If knwn.
N(JWl t-~ r~ ~ Y`, ~ ~'►"c~ 5 ~ ~(J- ; ( cv)
5
~ ~m~n ~s
c~ .CUr
b Are there any off-site sour[es of esuisslons or odor thet may +ffect your proDOSaI' If so,
generally deStrtbe. ~
N r_9 'rG,m ~U' q <<< ~ I
~ ~
y~~V ~
~.C cU~ TS
C Droposed meaiures to reduCe or COnirol emlSitons Or Other fmpaCti t0 a1r, 1f al,y•
,
~n4J
Oh (n ir-~.. FS -7, 3►i67
) )
comp
3. 4ATER ~ ~ ~ ~ t.<,
~ ~
a. SurfaCe --7/~
~ 7
lll ls tnere any surfece rater bady on or in the imedlace vlclntty of tl+e stte lncludtnq year-
raund and seesonal ztreaas, saltvater, lakes, Donds, retiandsl' if yes, describe ty9e end ~
proviae nemes. I( approprtate, State what itream or rtver it fiovs into. )
i2i 11i11 tl+e project reQutre any wrk over, in, or adjacent to (withtn 200 feet) CDe described
waters' !f yes. Dlease describe and attach avatlable plans.
AI 0
3
SPOTJ1Ht LR7IR0MMf'Ll.L ORDIHASiCL '
{'aAt 197-1]-960) Seccion 11 !b 230(1)
D. CNVIRONHLNTAL E1.L`iLN^$ (continucd)
EvaluatLon For
Agencr uee on17
(7) Eeti m ce the •oount ot (111 •nd dredge uterial tluc vould De p Lced in or reooveC trom the
w rtace weCer or veciand• •nd lodl u re the are• of the •!te clut vauld be aftectcd lndt uce
the eource of [tll orcertal
(4) utll the proposai requlre surfaee wmtat vlthd n wl• or diversioru' Clve • geoeral descLlp-
[lon, purpose, and appTOxiaate puantltles. St knovrt. IV4-
(5) Does the proposal lle vithin • 100-yeAr [looA plalnl II so. noce loeatlon on the slte plao
.
T 4UN-r Ar-LLGV5= ~ V`~~ '
-71
(S) floes the proporal involve anr diseharyes of vu t• nsterial• co •urfaee vatate• [f go,
descrlbe the [ype of vastc aad anciclpated volume ot discfurge.
e crouna
(1) ytll ground w tet be vithdravn, or v111 wter be dlactu rged to aroundvacet' Gtvt genetat
deserlptlon, puryose, •nd approxleute Quantities, lf timovn.
.Ai
~9a nn 1,3
DescriEe vaste nacerial chat vil! Ee distfiarged loto the grouod trom •epcic tanks or ocher I~Ch~ y(i' Po1 rcu
•anltary vascs cruoeat taelllty. Deseribt the eeneral aiie o( the •ysten. Chs nvaDer of 1
howes to be oerved (lf applicable) or the numCer of persoeu the srstev(s) ■re espected to ( t J.1~,(~~
aerve ~Il,
l1 '
- ~ ~j C
~ l r1 C, 1 Y~~' Cl)
l
(3) Descrlbe any systens, oche[ than thos• desi;oed for the dlspoaal o( u nicary vu te ~ ` ~ P
Lnecalled [or the purpose ot dlachar&inj tlulds belov the gt wod •utt u• (lnclude• srstem• sue~ ~1~11,✓
ao those !or che dlsPoral ot •coes wcsr or draloAQe Irm [loor draloA). Describe the cypa o!
6 yetan. the •oount ot wAcscl,al to De disposed ot throuah tM srstes •nd the types of aaterlall r~
llkely to be 41sposed ot (1ncluding u terials vhlch aa,I eo[ec cl+e *?scm inadvartencly cArw gh ~
oplll• or a• • resul[ o[ (ireflshclnj •ctivltlts). ,
~
1-3
U C..~-~~~
(J 1.,.~'~
(4) wlll •ny chmical• (eapecially organic solvenc• or petroleua tw 1s) be stored !n above-
grouad or uaderground scorage canfu' If •o, vhat tTpe• sod auaattclea of titerial• vtll be
stored' •
c~c>f 1/7
~
SPOKANL QM&ONT¢H'[JL Os.DINAHCY
(VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11 LO 230(1) ° j
D. CAYIROTi1MffTA1 LLaM1','S (contlnued)
£veluation For
Age~cy Use Ortly
(S) uhat protec[1ve x ssuree vlll be u ken to lnsure tN t lesk• or spl11• of any cheviCaL
scored or used on ette vill not be •lloved to percolate to grouodveter (chls Setlude• oeasuref
to keep chealu 1s out of dlsposal mrsces• dest[lbad !n 3b(2) •oA 7b(3)*
! •
t
c vacer P.unoff (including •toco varer)
(1) DescYibe the source of tvoott (including •cors vater) aad nettiod ot colleetlon and dimpo ul ~
lf ♦ny (includc Quancitles, tf knovn). v1+eTe vtll this vacet tlov' W111 tA1s wacer flov lnto ~
other wacerO I[ •o, descrlac
W I I ( ~I~t ZU ~~C~i -ed I I"1
r~,t 4-_% +~..n~ • -~Y
u Op
(2) '.till any chenitals De scored. handled or used on the sice in a loucion vMre a spill oc
lest, vitl draln to surface or arounCvatet oc to •storo vater dLspoaal eTot m dlacharEtng co
sucface or ground vater'
All
I>!
(J) Cou1Q vaste oateriala encer ground ar •utface %aterm' lt so, generally descclDe
.A► (CS j~
,`~~,~1 rl~ .r1
e
~ ~ f s
d Proposed oeaw ceii to reduce or control wrfaee, ground, and cunott w cer Lopacts, tl, any (1(
t the proposed acclon Ile• vlthln the Aquifer Sensitlve Arei be •spetially clu[ oo eiplanacioaa
r relacing co [acilities`concernina Sections 3D(4). 3b(5), •nd k(2) of tnis c!uckli st
'~"'-{j~/~I C~ ~
C
~ r'r
(C) ~CI f•~P% C` t"C
, ~ ~
rc ~
~
C;
rurrs ~
a Teck or clccle type of vege utlon louoC on the •Lce ~
dcciduous tree alder, oaple, &open, other
~/e
" vergreen t~ee flr, eed~t, pine, other
v .hcub•
V gras•
pasture
erop or gcala
vet •oll planu, uttall, Duttertup, Dullcwh, okua1c cabbast, ochec.
M cer plants• r cer lilly, eelgraas, allfoil, other
other types of vesecatioa.
p What kind •nd aawnt of vegetatioe will De removed or •ltered•
Fv ro v TN , I r r J-
c list tficeatened or endaogered speeles lmovci co De on or near the •1[e v•17}1\.Q
d Proposed landseaping, we ot aacive qLnta. or other eaasureS to presecve er enhae+ce vaEeuttua
o n c h e slte, t f a n y 5(Yr~!
~
w L~ ~'J r l/l~p ~P
l~ '
` ► I~-
,
c\n e
. , 0 SPOKAKE EHVIROWEt(TALORO(xA11CE
;";AC 191-;11-96C; Section il 170.230(1)
8 ENYIROXMENTIIL EIEHENTS Itonttnued)
Evaluation For
, Aqency 'Jse Oniy
S AN1NkL5
a -'ircle any DircS ano enimals wnicn nave been observed on or neer tne slte or are kna.n co :a :
or near the site ,
biras nawk, neron, eegle, songbirdz, other*
mimials deer, oeer, elk, beaver, other
fish besi, salmon, trout, nerrinq, shellElsh, other
O[her
b List any tnreateneC or endangered soeties kno.rn to De on or nEer the stie. /
i
1 ~
C. iz the site part ot a miyration rouit7 If so, eaalain.
d Proposed neasures co preserve or enhance wi1d11fe, 1f eny. ~a S G~~
~ EyEaGr a;rD yaruRAL 4E5OuR[ES
a Jhet kinas of enerqy (electric, nacural ges, waoC stove, solar) vill De used to meet tne
cne tomoLeced D-ijeCt's enerqy neeai' DeStriDe rhetrer 1t rf11 be used for heeting, nunufic-
tur+ng, etC .
L Lt L~~2 ~r F: U f~ Yiv\ ~
h-or v\c, v v~ , t
l
h s+ould your proJec: altect the potenN al uze of soler energy by ad~acenc prooerties' " ic,
qenerally 4escrioe
c uhet tinds of enerqy Comservetion teetures ere inCludeG tn the plens of tnls orooosal' _+S: ,
Oth2r 2rOpaSeC N:3SUf25 t6 TtCuCt Or COntr01 tntr9Y 1fvaCtS. ~f a~y
~
- ~~~8r~ G~ir ~ tn.~ ~ Ga~ ( v" , . . S Cc 0)
~ v ~ ~
: c(`
7 ENV(RONMENTAL NEAL7H
d. Are tntre any lnvlrOrxntntnl hGelth hd2arES, inCludtn9 Qx00SUre t0 tOx1C ChemlCdlS, r1Sk Of ftre
and exDtOSion. SD111, or raZardOUS weSLe, tnat GOUld OCCUr eS D reSV1t Or tAis prapOSel' :f s0,
describe.
/ ► (J
(1) DescriCe sDecial enerqen[y servlces that miqht be required.
6
. . ~ ~
, • 9POUJiL LNVISOtQe7ttLJl. OnIPAI=CL 4.
.
(VAC 101-11-960) Settlon 11 10.230(1)
b. C`tVIROM{ER'CAL LLETM4°5 (conclnued) Lvaluatlon Foc
Agenty Use Ortly
EIIV[ROtt!e:rAL NEAL-R (contleued) `
(2) Proposed nessure• to reduce oc concrol eavirowen[a! health tu :ards. If •p7
b Notee.
(1) Vl+at t)pe• ol nolas eYisc !n the ataa vhich sa7 alfect 7 w r project (toc esuuDls trattlc,
eQutpmnt, opetacion, otAet'
(N ~ s ri rv 1 ra..~~ L;~o t''s r~
(2) uhat qpes and leveli o( nolst vould be cruced !ry or •uocLted vith the pro}eet oo a
shorc-tero or a lon;-cerv basls ([oi esanple: tra[tic. conscn►ccion, opecacl=o, ocAer)' Indicace
vhat houra notse vould cose iros the site
C vh,t ~~Uc~t`( v~i #l~i ~ D,r f' • '~l ~i'
C,rc-'~~~
~ f~
r r Jr~l_ .7 I
'
(J) Pzoposed measure to reduce or control rtoise tepacts, t! •ay
~
8 U'M AND SNORELI'IE USE
a vhat 1• the wrrent we ot the slce •nd •djaeent Drope[cies' R4 [ DCSIQ~.I~ ~ ~ IyJ~t'~ ~~~n ~ ~
`
kvvv 1 /
~ 4 F ~
, - . ~ I r~~f,~-~~1
b 14@ the sLte Deen uscd tor •sriculcure` I[ •o, desttlbe JYA s
'c.~
1=0 )0 ~S 13 1
t Destr be any structures on the sSte
1 r
. C_V)
d. Vill any scructures De de;o 1 hedP If so, vhlch' ~L~ ~ ~ ~~i/s/ t` j (r~x\~l )
ev ^ _J
UJALH w ~.1
P-71
/V
e What to the eurres+c sonin; elaselSiu cioo of ttu sicet ~LRI
f Vh&c 1• che curreec empreRenaive pLn designicioa oI cAe sice'
g it appllcable, vhat 1o the curreot shorellne aAs[er prosr~a dasigsution ol the sLte'
~
h 11&& aor part ot the stce Dcen elauttled ao ~eeviroaa+o[nlly woAlelva" are4l It w, cr
•petity
,L~(~
/2:;5A7 U-
i Appro:laately hw maay peo le vould ceside ot work in the completed Qroyect'
,u rf,
7
. . ~
~ STORARL L7tPIYA10QN'[Ji. OBDI1lANCL
i ~
(VAC 197-11-960) Seccioa 11 10 230(1)
D CN7IAONTtLNi11, CI.aQ;7'LS (eonciaued)
!valwclon For
\ Agency Use Oqly
) Appro:laacely hov maoy people would Che coapleted project disp Lce' ~
~
/
k Ptoposed ne&eures to avold or reduce dlsp L c m ent tmpaccs. Sf any
~.5ci
" " oo0)"')
c~ ~ ' 1 ~i,
1 Proposed oessures co ensur• the proposal is coupatiDle vlth e:iacio.s aod pro}ected L rtd w ee aod
plans, 1f •ny• 4
C0 2v~t,ti,~
~
vv%_~ V_V/
~ f 1,ti11 ~c ~ ~ ~
t~~~;,l~~~C' ~r1 p ,
9 HOUSINC
• Approximately hw aany wlts vould be pro+ided, lf anyt Iodlu[• vdCMt higfr. alddle-, or ~ ~ f ~ }
tov-lneooe howtn
s
b Approxioately hov asny uaits. it aery, would De elldnaCed1 iadlucs v1+etMr hiQh-, aiddle-, or
law-tncove hou.ing
c Propoee~1 musures to reduee or control houalns lopacte, 1l aer:
/YO T Sv~ ;~'r • r-~-~` ~7/~I
10 AES'11E71C5
~ Vhat 1• the tallest height ot any yroposed •truccure(e), not includint ancecmast Y1uc to the
principal e:certor Dutldt S oAterlal(@) proposed'
vC~~-~~
J"
c►-~r~~'ti d~,~_~ r h~ r~ -~I ,
~ ~ 1 ~ ; ~00-1
b VhaL vlev• ln Che Sasedlatt viclnltr vwld De altered or o0dttvctad• ~^~l
1_/ I
J1rq)
c Proposed ee&sure@ to reduce ot concrol aescMtic lapeecs, t[ any /XP
' ~ G ~f , / ~ ~
11. LIGH- A?7D GL~AE ~ ~ `~V
a 'Rut cype of light oc 6Lre vtll cfia propoaal pcoduee! 11Tuc tise oI day vould 1t aalnly occur• ~o~;n en
~
►~Y~ n~-~ ~r~1 1 h~~ ~ L , ,
b Could Lfaht or gLare tron cha tinishad projecc ba • utetr ha:ard or locartore vicA •lAVGt
/YD
~k- (
c Vtut ezisting oft-•ite •wcces ot llght or gLre say a(fect your propo•al? P
~
~~p~
d Proposed oessure• co rcduce or coacrol lighc nd aLre Lapacts, 1[ aoy. 1'N )
9J
, .
'x c-
r ~rc
-~a ~7 % a► /'i7
, . ~
' sros.An uvixo►revuL ciptwa ,
(vAC 197-11-960) Scc:loo 11i10 230(1)
6 Q7VIROLdQRTAL L1SS'~°Yi5 (coaclowd)
Ev•tuacton Fnr
Agenty Une Only
1: RECVE Ai LOti
a vhat deitRottet •ad inforval reereatlonal opporcuniCle• a[e ln che laaedlace Ylcint:v'
R~~~ ~ rrtl ~ Ai.rl c~
b Uauld che pcoposed pcoSect dlsy L ce •ny e:lstiag recreatiooal uses' ii so, descilDe
c Proposcd aaaoures to reducc or corttrol I,pact• oo recru tloo, locludlna, recrw clooal opporcuai-
cie• co De provtded by the project or appllu nc, lE aoy•
13 HIS'ORIL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATtON
a Are there •ny places or objects lisced on or proposcd tor naciorul, +tace or local preserva-
tton reglacets knovn to De o0 oc neat co the •1ce' It •o, aenerally desctibq
b Generally destrSDe aoy laed mArk• or evidence ot hlscorlc arcAaeologltal, sctsn::':t or :ul;u-a1
tepo«ancc lmwn to De on oT ne=t Co tre slce
c Propoaed nea wces co reduce or contzol tapaccs, tt •n7• ~ l
~
14 'P.ANSPOR;'A7LON
a identlfy publlc scCetco •nd ht;hver• •ervlnQ ths slce and deecriDe Droposed acce u to :he
e:lsting streec sysces. Sroroe •lta p L ni, tf •ny
(1N iUc~Jzs~ _ Q rli U_ (7- ~ 7TM
~ I• ~ite cucrencly •ecYSd by puD tc etan~ic' If noc, ylut ts the •ppro:ia.ce C:oc.oce 4oh, CA 0\~
nuresc [ranAtt .cop'
~ c Itov oanr Dar5r1c~ sDace• vould the compleced pro~et , Bov raerr vould the pro}ect eli
/Y or 4::~-~c- Y(z-T- -vp
~~.~1~'n Li
. r~S
d Vill the proposal requlre •oy aav road• or st[eat&, or lmprovaara[r co ezisting rwds or sct« t~ l {
noc lncludln,g dtivewyat If to, acoAr.iir descrfDe (lodiuce vhetf+er public or priwce)
~l7 ~
f_ om ~ ► ~ _
e vtll che proJec[ use (or oecur in the laa.dlate rtcinit7 of1 wa[er, rail, o[ air [raasporcatloo'
tf so, generally descrlbe
/Vv
9
sYOKAtce r.xvinorrrQVCSi. o%ntxu+cz 1#
(vAC 197-11-960) Scccioo t1.Iti 270(1)
E. Z"IROld`fn'_At, B.OMtS (concinued)
CvaluaCion For
Agcac) Use 0017
f How aAnr vehlcular ccips per day vould be geaeraced b7r the cooDleted project' t[ lmovn.
tndiuce vheo puk vould occur l .
M /
Bt r/~/cv • ' ~G j
ProPo.ed oaaaures co ccduce or coetrol cran•DoTtatlon i■P•ets. lt •n7:
8
15. PUSLIC SERVTCES
a `Jould the pcojeet result in an loeruted aM 4 for publlc •ttntee• (for esawple. [!re pro[ectioo,
pollce protectioc, healtfi cars, •cfiools, othsr)? If so, gensrally descTiDe.
/Y__] J
b Proposad oeasure• co reduce or toncrol dlrecc lmpaccs on puDlic •ervicrs, 1' •ny:
N/J.
16 l.:itl"iES
s Clr-Clt uSill-td-e•tt t-l~r"rrri bl• •t the •ice• e•etcltic~cutal ey(relue~
~ r!~_celepho~e a~altaT7 2evr, •epclc systas, o.--
~
b DescclDe the utllltlea thac ate pcoposed tor t1u 9roSect, the utlllt7 providlns the setvice and
the oeneral conscruction •ttlvicles oo cAe sita or So the lmsediate ricinit7 vhich a1jAc be
needed rl~'!
C SIGNATURE
l, the underglgntd, svear ueder the penalcy ot perjury chat the •bove respoores •ce mad• ctv[htu11Y and to the besc ot sy liaw ledge I also
understsed tFuc, •tiould chera Ds •or villtul niarepreseocacioo or villtul Ltk of (ull disclosu[e on ay part, the aRene/ say vichdrav •ny
detefalnation o[ onal lficsace clut !c alshc tsaue ln cellanee upoa thi• eleetllet
D~ ce ( .f,/ _ i Propo ot -5-EFV ~ ~ ~ (
(Plsu e Pr1oc or Type)
Proponent e Addtau: ~/321c)C
(Signacure) /J
Phone. / 61-o~zqa
Person cooplecing [oca. -6614min'U= O+te I'm
Phone. JA11CZ V' /0/9
/
TOR STAtT OSE ONLT '
Staft oesber(s),revleving checkllsc: ~ /e;o~~/l.{
based on Z. icaff tevtev of the environnental checklisc ar+d otM r per[!oe nc lolonu[loo, the statf:
A Concludes that thete sre no pcobable slgnlfiunt •dverse lapacts aed reeamead• • datecaloActoe oC eonaignlfteaace
6. Cooclude• chac piobable •ignlflcant ♦dverse envitonaencal impact• do ezlsc toc the turtani proposal aod recoaoeeds a aitlgated deter-
oloacion ot aonsigniticaoce vich cooditions
C. Goncludes [lu[ CI+eCe are probable signlficAnt adverse aavironmeacal tapucs aod recos►+eod• a detervieutloo of oLgni(Lcance
TILIlIG TSt - 375.00
10
~
SQOKANE COUNTY DIVIStON OF BUILDONG AND PLANNING
iIECEIVCD
SPC!KANE CQUNTY ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
17 1997
PART I
~IVIS10P1~~ NFORNMATION
LegalOwner tkTC=v(!' Pt~ TPES-9 .S~r-~-~nraur'?
Mailmg Address & ( I 32-v kw-TN Y 13e..
City S&Jya-nq 1~' State \6e/q. Zip Code
Phone y1o''T - „?qc,) (Work) ~Qf~ (Home) Fax
Apphcant/Agent !5T- V- y~~ "!I L,
Mailing Address Z02_ TE r-n! I
City - State Zip Code ~ W z.
Phone $291D (Work) 00 (Home) Fa~ Zy " 1 Z.55`
(F APPLiCANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN WNER AUTHORIZA710f~OR APPLI ANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE bw yv-d n akc,,r
r~.~-
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft .60Q
5^ ~19, ou0 5 = ToTG4L 57 6 nO 5,F
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft )
Assessor's parcel numbers of project/proposa! 1 Z. 13Y ~ +
Assessor's parcel numbers of adJacent area owmed or controfled
Street address of proposal Z I V11l I V (7 e S I T`-K
Existing zone classification(s) and clate established U R 3.'S
Existing use of property S iiy GLt= FwMl ~Y - iD 1) P L c-- x
Proposed zoning V ~ -Z Z
Comprehensive plan category School district C Piv~,fir
R ~ ~4n~ ai UJ/ v-n N. . 3s
~
Water purveyor M o Fire district IV n. I
Proposed use of property
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings ~ p r
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Other N-- Describe L 1*111 i;"q
N
List previous planning division actions involving this property #Vurvc=
C~
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION JNFORMATION
Location of proposa! S'`I Z I~r4 ~/11 ! V~ j'c S! Tq
Section Z~ Township 2S Range
Name of public road(s) providing access _ Un1 ~ vr.US i i Y ~IIL-
Width of property fro»ting on public road -7 Tq ~ Z) S
uTH A UC= 015 ~
UN 1 V r e 511"Y Z. b O~ f! -
~
~ r
ZONE RECLASSIFICATtvN APPLICATION PAGE 2 of 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yesx No
Name(s) of arterial roads vnV i U&rs i 7'Y
Legal description of property for eacli zone reclassifrcation proposed
P~►,G[,I ~ y s Z ~-t.~, ~ ~
~
oPP Q~u qP- c~j -S vL~ ~ Iqs L -7 9
y
.~C""v r C) ~ y s z t 3~5
`
aLp 0 LD O&A~ S~ R. ~9 L"
Existing zone(s) to proposed zone(s) UR_ Z.Z
for the following described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below
If you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it? __r kjafd ~14 ~
Pow r_ e-11 ~ y S Z I Z.~ 3~ vv~~~r~.0~,(.✓ C ~C) P✓ rjr)AGt-~ w,~6~ Pov~ 4-s-zlz. 13" .5u b4_tj iy--) aplo rm OL ~A ilIc,_
c.rxa C) r - .
What are the changed condi ions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
' ~
d `
r 5 .
~
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? T
w IN ~ b v?~. s d- va-c.od- La-t`
, ,
~ 'A~~ r Y,C,Alcl~ ~ r , '~tt_ ►'1. C i o ~
~ 1
Vvicy,
r
What factors support the zone reclassrfication? r_(~~ ~~Q/~„~ d
~ m~ c IV I vr2s I ; p r
~ What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land usa?
rv
~ ~v~►~P/~
~
S cA In I vt IA
~ ~ .
~ i
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN APPLICATION PaGE 3 of 4
PART II
This section of the application will provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal
to the Division
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A This proposal is within Fire Protection District No i
B. Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and faci ities for fire protection purposes
C Recommended fire flow 78P ; or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive, and will be de ermined at time of building permit application
D Requirements include ±eP&&v -7
5•C.r.D. 7/~b197
Fire District SI ure/Title Date WATER PURVEYOR
A Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements (hav (have not)
been made
B Requirements/comments
Tr r,.` , c el~e~
~ • ~
/ -i`,"r
Water Distr ct ignature/Title Date
`tOUNTY ENGINEER
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general reqLiirements for roads and drainage iiave
been discussed with the applicant
A Comments l
1 I ~ ! I
i4ignature /Title Date
k'COUNTY UTILITIES
A preiiminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is
/2~.'/aA-r14C/
A Comments M-1-61pc UAc2 0zelV48r,> U
SignaturelTitle Date
REGfONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
A prelimin ssion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposa!
*&1-8)have not en satisfied
. •
A Comments .
Signa relTitl . Date 7 / 4/f~
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and generai requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant
A Comments ~rv,~'•~ ~f'.~'~Gi~/.~,t45 ,rxij~,c. v~.~ •r~ Lr0!/.vri~ .SFsv~~
Signature/Title Date
~
~
l
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 4 of 4
PART I I I
SURVEYOR VERlFICATION
I, the undersigned, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the information requested for the
zoning map and written iegal descriptio
~
Signed ~ C' Date
~
Address ~ ~o/v Phone -~'1/0-7 -/-xT? 0
City State LVI-2 Zip 99009
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROpERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORtZATION
I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under pena(ty of perjury that the above responses are made
triathfully and to the best of my knowledge
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identified land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewith is wntten permission from the
owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf
Signed S~"CVG SGarvrnav j Z.._. Date 7•~/- ~
Address Phone - 6 ZS/ "/V19C4 ~7'~Zr?l) C~A'1,
City 5/040&f9-9~t,~ State • Zip
~
Signatu`r of applicant or r esentative Date
State of Washington )
) ss
County of Spokane )
Signed an sworn or a irmed before me on this day of 19 61'~
by =
Notary Se
A~~11 11/~QO'N:'o E. Notary ~blic in dnd fdr/the State of Washington residing
%%~~~°A !Dy~i at, .<,✓.Z~.~Q.~~C
NOT qR ~ `
~ My appointment expires
•
p+ini ! .
PART V
Ol' bVAS~~~~~~~ To BE coMd~€+~19ME DIVISION OF 6UILOING AND PLANNING
i
Date submitted cOFile number -7~` '--4q7
Date accepted Ju, By
Total fees fteceipt number
~
PREI RC2Qd7E APAI K13 4-97
I
S P O K A N L s; , C O U N T Y
- DF-PARTMENT OF BUILDINC AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMFS L MANSON, C B O, DIREC70R DENNIS M SCOTT, P.E, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM RECEI{/ED
To: amwot Jul 2 1 Iyy/
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Re
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby 9111114 Figi'Reeriq
Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski
Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
Department of Transportation, Mark Rowher
Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Miles
Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
Central Valley Schoo! District No. 356
Fire Distrlct No. 1; Kevin Miller
Model Irrigation District No. 18
FROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner
DATE: July 21, 1997
RE: ZE-48-97; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
TECHNICAL RrVIEW MCE TING
JULY 31, ] 997 AT 3:00 P.M.
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1S` FLOOR CONFEItE, NCE ROOM
Please review the above application and use the attaclled TECHNICAL REVIEW MEET[NG
FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to
afitend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this
meeting. If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments
on the attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS
will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and
Planning file. Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the
application, please contact me at 456-3675.
NOTE: The Division of Iiuilding & Planning `vill now be circuiating comments for SEPA
C1lecklist at the time of technical 1•eview. This will be the ottly time you will be
able to comment regarding the SEPA Cliecklist for t6is project.
c: Steve & Tresa Schmautz, 11320 N. Kathy Drive, Spolcane, WA. 99218
Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Appllcation, Site 1'lan, SEPA Checklist
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
ButtDitvC; PHOtvE (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
PLANNING PHONE (509) 456-2205 • Fnx (509) 456-2243
TDD (509) 324-3166
'
Technical Review for July 31, 1997 at 3:00 p.m.
ZE-48-97; Zone Reclassification
Generally located east of and adjacent to University Road, north of and
adjacent to 8"' Avenue and south of and adjacent to 7"' Avenue in the NE
'/4 of Section 21, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban within the Priority Sewer Service
Area (PSSA) and the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UFZ-22) on
approximately 1.32 acres of land for those uses allowed within the Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
PARCEL NUMBERS: 45212.1348
SITE SIZE: Approximately 1.32 acres.
APPLICANT: Steve & Tresa Schmautz
11320 N. Kathy Drive
Spokane, WA. 99218
(509) 624-1019
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Francine Shaw
' ` ~ ~ ~
Y,"rLa (c):
. IP. - ~ ~
~-JMJ6 ~
EI~~VIRON~IVIENTAL ORDINAI`~CE
SPOKANE
SECTION 11.10.230 ,1_
~
~ SFOKAME EHY1ROta1E!(TAl QROINANCE
.
(ullC 19/-11-9601 Seccion )1 10.21ot 11
Envirornr.ntal Chetkllzt ~
f
i 1 1 C MO ~f
Puryose of Chectllzt• /
The State Enviroroental Doltcy Act (SEPA) cha0ter 43.21C RCv. reputres all governmental agencles to Conslder the environrnental taoacts of a oroposal
before aakiny Aecisions. An Environmental lmpect Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all Orovosals vith probable signtficant adverse impactz on
the quality of the environment. The purpose af this Chetkltst 15 to providt inforawtion to I+elp you and the aqenty identify irnpacts fron yovr
proposal (and to reducc or avoSd inpacts from the proposal. tf tt cen Oe done) and to he1D tne egency decide rhetner an E(5 is required
lnstructtons for Applitants.
This envirornaental checklist asks you to Geicribe saoe Dasic lnfonmtton about yw r proposal. Goverr,mentat agencies uze this cl+ecklist to determine
rhether the environaental irtpatts of your proposal ere siqnifltant, requlring preoeration of an ElS. Ansver the Questians briefly, wit1+ the most
precise infornetion kno.n, or glve the Dest Aescriptton you can.
'fou must ansver each questton eccurately and carefully. to the best of rour kn w leCge. ln wost ceses, ya shoul4 be able to answer tAe Questions
from your ovn observations or projeCt plens vtthw t tAe need to hire experts. lf ycu reaily do not tnov the ansver, or Sf a Question Coes not aODly
to your proposal, vrfte 'Co not know• or 'does not epD1y•' Ca.olete enswers to tne qw stlons nar aw y aroiC unnecessary delars later
Sorr Questions esk aDout qovern.ental regulations, SucA as zoning. shorellne. and landmark destgrottons. Ansver these Questlons 1f you can If you
Aave probleas, the goverrasenta) aqenctes can assist you.
The cheCklSst ouesttons •pply to a11 parts of yovr proposal. even 1/ you olon to Eo them over a period oI ttme or on d1llerent oarcels of 1end.
AttaCh eny •dditional tnformtlon that w111 desCrlbe your proDOSaI or 1ts envlronnental effeCti. The iqency to whitn you SuOmtt this checklist nav
ast you to explain your ansrers or provtde sddltlonal inforwatian reasoneDly related to detem tntng 1f tl+ere mer ee signiflcant adverse imoact
Use of chec1c11st for nonproject proposals:
CoRplete thts checklfst tor nonproject pro0osals, even thougl+ puestions may be +nsreree 'does not aoply'
IN ADOITIOM. complete the SUPPlET1ENTAl SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIOt15(Part 0).
For nonprolett atttons, the referentes in the CheCkllst to tl+e wrds 'projett.' 'aOD11cant.' and 'DroOerty ar Site' SAOUId De read ds 'proposai,'
'oroposer.' and 'afiected geograpl►ic area.' resoectlvety.
A. BACKGROUf10
1. hu.e of proposeC proje[t, tf aDOliCa01e. / G;
2. yar of Applicant rJTGL= a" TQCSW SCliY" 4kvl~
7. Address and phone nunDer of appllCant or Coniatt person' LAM- , 9oZJ ~
(~6a~ y e, -~~o
1. Oate checklist prepareC. TIn 1T ~Cl OL 1
S. Agency repuesting checklist• f2Z
6. Draposed tininq or tC►+edule (1ncluCinq phestny. if applttnblel'
~ -
7. a. Do you have any plens for future addttions, expenslon, or turther ♦cttvttr related to or co m ected rlth this proposal' It yes, explain.
f U ~U,re C t-~IZU L.T-1 c~ ~v ~ {~g~s ~ ✓v~., -
~ t
D. Oo you ovn or have options on land neerDy or adiacent to thts proposal• lf yes. e:pliln.ye5, r
.P r Ai✓ G ~ GOl I~G ~ LU d (-VlQ 5UU ~
r C 07 1161= d- ~ T(+ i41I1G.
8. List any environmental informatton you know about that has Deen Orepared. or w111 be prepered. Eirectly relateC to tnis proposal
8.0 1n.0 17V1n (AA,00k/►TP 01 .
0
Rrv.2/1/88 I
~ sPO~c~e amao~rr~~riwt. o~~NUU.~~,
(.AC 191-11-9M.) Sec:toa li ;C :30(1
)
IL 6ACxCdOQ'7J ICOnclnueC)
9 Oo •ou 'cn w wtut`ier •pol! u tiorti •re pending for governaentel aODtova1• of other pronoaal• ..reetlv a:'ec::,q •tia propert+ covere,' bv ~our
propoea!' /.-s, ezplatc
ND
l0 Llet any governaot approvals or peratcs t►+at rt11 be needed (oc 7out pro9os&l. 1` known ~U~L {,J 1 /V~j ~WUJ
t'-vn)25- PR_O,rFzi-
11 G1ve • bclef, c m plece deacrSptlon o( your pfopoaal, tncludlng the proposed use• •nd the •t:e ot the project end •tte -liere sre several
questloeu lacer ln thie chetkllst Chac aati yov to desertbt certaln aspects ot your DropoOa! Y w do not neeC to rep ut those ansvers on this
pege
~v c► r~ i s b 00 S t= a w. v~d,vY cvr~'~~ t,~_~E'
S~' 7- ~.o~&
,
~i~.Li. - T"
~1., i U ~O1/C
M ta" cLo~
l~.ws ' v
~ ~
Locacton of ctie propoaa! Gtve gut(letenc te(orsacton (or a perwn to undersund the prec:ee loutlon o: -)w proposec prc rc:, ^c:ud:-ip a
stseet aedress, anv, and seecion, townshlp •nd [aege, t( kr+ovn Tf a propo u 1 woutG occur over • ran;e : srca ~co~'.Ie Lhe •an*4e or
bouedattea of the alte(s) Provlde a leg+l descrSpcion, sSte plan, vtclnlcv y D. and :oooqrapnsc =Ap, -e u orubt eva1_a3.e -1':e -ou
ahould fubmtt anv pians relulred bv the agency, yw ace M1ot ceQulred to dvplLCate naD• oc detaL:ed plan• su mle: vitr, an~ ~e a~o.l:rtlan
reUted to cRis checkltsc
"57-i ILZJ ~f~ I U~ -Z1 1-r 4z:~ML--1A-` W.-r L.LLc-ta4-,_.."
Qy~ ~p,P -Vr5?' S►Qi- ()N I UEi2s i J"Y _`V 7 rH ,rO~
~aLp ~ TN
Does the provoseG accton Ste vitAln the AQul'e[ Setul[lve \re• l1S A)' -1x General Sever Setv:ce Aree' $tve, Se- ^.r Ares' 'he
C't% of Spokane' 'See Sporane :ounty a ASA /)vcrla- =one ktlso !or Soundarles)
✓,1)/1~ ~t~~~ ~~~U~G('' {'q'~~N-'~
-0 EE COKPLE'LD 8T APPI.ICAN'
9 VWTAO`l`CEN-..AL £1_^(..°`ITS
=vaiw::o^ zot
kgenc~ _se
cAP_T
a. General descrtptlon o( the •tte (elrcle one) ( L c~ olling. hilly, .ceep slepe#, so-iec.lnoue,
other
.1.~
b "hat la the sceepeat ilope on the slte (sppro:laate pt roent @Lope)'~ /f1d_/
Gj' r I/ 04.11 - "S'/ /`y
c 'Jhat genere! :ypes of so!!s •re found on the olte (for exanple, c1aY •~nQ pea t muck)'
[f vou knov the clamslf! u tlon o( agricultural •otls, spetlfv t►ua a nte anv prtae `an lend
d kre the[e aurface lndlcacloee o[ hieco r o( uru uble •olle tn ;tx t=aediact vlctnltv' so,
deacrtbe
/ Y O
(w0.C 191-11-960) Settlon 1130.230111 SP01UlNE ENYIRONKEMTAI QaOiHAHCE
B. ENY(ROfMENTAL ELEMENTS(COntlnueG)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
e Oestrfbe tne puroose, type, and spDroximate Quentities of any f111/ng or grading proposea
indiCate sourte of f111.
Ip i Su2r I F /V 1: C=6 (=1J •
f LoulA erosion o a ur as a result of clearing. tonstruttlon, or use' If so, qenerally descrlDe.
►VIJ
q About vhet percent of the itte rfil be covercd w1th impervtous surfaces after project construc-
tion ((or exartple, aiDhalt ar bui141ngs)'
I~. r-5
1+. ProposeE n+easures to redute or Control eroston. or otl+er impatti to the earth, 1f any•
►`t'~ Scnr,% 1nn,0-S T L I I«= L~i-
2. AIR
a uhet type of enissions to the eir rould result fron tne propose) Il.e.. dust, automoDlle, aaors
industrial, vood smoke) durinq Conitructlon end rnen the pro)ett Is coaoleted' if eny,
generelly describe end give approximate quantltes 1f knorn.
/W4
b. Are there any off-SSte SourCes of enissfons or odor [hat nu r affect your pr00ose1' If s0,
generally describe.
N~
c. Vroposee measures to reduce or Control emisilons or other tmpecti to •tr, 1f eny•
3. ua7Ea
a. Surface
(1) ls Cnere •ny Surfate rater body on or in the 1mmedlate vttinity of the stte tnttuatng year-
round and seesonal streans. saltrater, lakes, vonds, yetlands)' lf yes, descrtbe type •nd
provide names. If approprtete, state vhat s[reem or rtver 1t flors in[o.
AwY
(2) will tAe project requtre any wrk over, 1n. or adjecent to (wlthin Z00 feet) the descrfDed
waters' If yes, please Cestribe and attath availeDle plans.
AI o
3
~ SPOtAta LRV'IROtR9L1CLAL OBI;IMANCE
r
(JAC 197-11-960) Seccion ll.l"D 230(1)
D. ENYIRONlSPNTAL CL.L`tLt~'S (continued) Evaluatlon For
Agen<y Use Onir
(7) Eeticvte the asourtc a( [lll •nd dred;e macerial cFut vou1d be PL+ced Ln or removeQ troa the
aurface w cer or vctland• and tadl u te the •re• o[ tAe S1[e chat vould be •ffectcd Indl utc
the sovrte of [t!1 o+terlal
/ V V'T
(4) Ntll the pTOposal tspulre sutf u• yter vlthdtyvel• of dlveTalons' Glae • yeoeral deserlp-
tion, putpooe, and •ppro:iaste Quantl[ies. Lt Icnovc►.
J/Y ~
(5) Dx • the proposal lie vlthin • 100-y u r tlood plala' Il 80, note locotion on cne •lte plao
~
- - c= ~
(5) Does the pioposal Lnvolve any dlstlutZe• of vutt eAterlal• to surfate va[eri' It •o,
QescrLEe the cype o( vaste and anticipated volure of dlocharHe•
A(O
~
p Gtovnd
(1) Vill groundvater De vlchdravn, or vill wter be dlseturRed to ground wtat' Ctve Qeaeral
dascrlpcton, purpose. and appro:tnate Quantitlei. lf 1novn.
Oescrlbe waste aateclal ttut vill be dtsclu rsed 1nCO cf+e gtound irom •eptit tanh• or othet
saoitary vasce ctu caeot tacll![y Dcsc[ibs the general •ice of the srscem. Che nm Oet of
roueea to be secred (Sf apyllcable) or the eumber o( peCsoeu the sYstev(#) •re eipected to
serve
DescrlDe any systems. ocM r tlun those deslgesd tor the dlspoaal o( sanitary vu [e,
Lnscalled tor the putpose o[ d1schartin6 (lulds beLov the `r wod •uttace (Sncluds• s7acros such
as chose tor the dlsposal of stoem vatar or draioa6• (rom lloor dcalos). Neeriba tl+e t7p• of
•ystea, che •oount of matarial to pe QSsposed o[ tAroush t!r •71steu and the trpe• o! aaterlais
likely co be disposed of (ineludlng aAterials vhieh u7 ancer tha e7scem loadvercancl7 throuth ,
@plll• or a result of tirefi{htlnt •ctlvities).
~ M"[
(4) 4111 •ny chmlcals (espeelally organlc solveoco or petroleus tuels) be •tored So aDove-
groued or uudetgcouad •totaQe canlu? It so, vlut c7Pes aod Quancicle• of sat4rlals vill be
sto[ed' ,
l11 t)
~
' sror.Axe DMIaoMQxut. osniHArrcf
(VAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11' 10.230(1)
D. L77P[ROTRtERiAL C1LMEr^5 (contlnued)
Evaluatton For
Ager+t~ U~e On1y
(S) ~Ruc protecttve measures wL11 De ulcen to insure chat lcak• or sptil• ot en• chenlcslo ocored or used on alce wtll not be •lloved to percolate to groundvster (thie locludes aeasures
to keep chenicals w t of dlsposal •rstcae descclbed in ]b(2) anA )b(])'
IYr//7
c Vater P.unot[ (lncludlrtg stoco vater)
(1) Describe tha •ource of cvoott (lncluding •cors vater) aad matbd of colleeCion and disposal
i[ •ey (include Quantlties, !t know►). Vhere vill chl• water tlov' Vl11 cAis water tlov lato
other vaters' It so, deserlEe.
F,L6.Lr dimf t:~ ZO b- &cc S
, Ca.r 4.1 ~
(2) 1111 anr cl+enicals Se stored, handled or used on cAe •lte tn • lou tioo vhsre a •plll or
leati vill draln to surlaee or aroundvatsr or co •stoc9 vocer dlsposal eyst s d1scAarQina co
•u[lace or Q[ounAvater'
N / G4
(7) Could vasce sacerlal• enter grwnd or suttace waters' It •o, aeo.r.lir deocrlDe
N 0
d Proposed measure• to reducs or control sur[ace, grw nd, and cvnof( vater Lspects, t! soy (if
t the proposid accion Lle• vithln th• Aqut[er Ssnoitive Aru b-o •ep.tlally clur oe asplaaaclons
r relatiag to [aeilitles toe+eetoins Seetton• 7D(4), 7b(S), aod 3c(2) ot thi• t Mek11ot)
a Pu:rrs
a rheck or tircle type o( vegetatlon [ound on che alte
~ Ceciduous cree alder, maple, •open, ocher
- evergreen tree tir. cedar, pine, otM1er
V .hrubs
V gru•
paRUre
crop or grala.
vec soLl p L ncs. cattall, buttarcup. bullrush, •kumk cabDage, ottrar
M ter plancs: water llllr, •eljrass. alltall, ocMc
ocher typa• ot vosatacloa
b 11fiac klnd •nd uount of vegetacfon v111 be reaoved or •ltered? -ALr 5:~(1
Fv rL) V-~ ~ cd l5
41rtL4 ()1n
c Llsc threa[ened or endaosered •pecle• lmovn co be on or near rhe eite. _ VVMAJ
d Proposed landscaping, us• of native p Lnts, or otRer seasures to preterve or entui+cs vseetatloo
on tAe •tce, if any
s
~ SPOKAxE ENY1A01ME:lTAI ORp1NAt1CE
;ectton 11 1b,230(1)
B. ENYlRUtMENTAL ELE?tENTS (continutd) Evaluecion ior
Agency Jse Only
S AhIHALS
e Cirtle dny DiriS 4n0 enimaiS vniCA nave OtCn ODSCrveO 0nOr neer the S1t2 0r dre knOwn t0 :
or neer the Stite
birtls na.+ic, neron, eegle. songOirds, other
memnals deer, oear, elk, beaver, other !
fisn bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellflsl+, other "
otner ~
b List any threateneG or endangered soecies knwn to De on or near the slte
VNA I v\J
c. ts tne site part of a nigration route' l/ so. exolain.
a Proposed neasures to preserve or ennence wildltfe. If eny ~p S G~'~' ~
' E`+ERGr A{Vp VATURAL 4.S3URC:S
d 1A4 t ki nds af enerqy (electric, na W rel 9as, wood stove, soler) r111 De used to meet tne
the tomoleted 2roject's enerqy needs' Describe whether tt r111 be vseG for heetlnq, nunufaC-
turing. etC.
LC' F012 1~n
tie-41 vu_ u ► -
1
h Would your projec: affect tne oocentlel use of soler enerqy oy edJecent vrooerttes' It sc.
generatly Cezcrioe
C uhet kinas of enerqy conservation feeturei are includeG tn tne Dlens of tAis prooosal' Is:
otner arooosec measures to reOuCe or Control energy 1rveCts. If any
" f/1/\ G ~l ~ tn.~ ~'Lol!"( ^ C/i~f
tV'0% LA
/ l
7 ENVIflQNMENTAL HEALTH
e. Are there any envlronrnental heeltl+ heiards. 1nc1uding exposure to toxic cneenicals, rist of ftre
anC eaplosion, soill, or netardous vaz[e, thet could octur es e result of this Droposel' ;f so,
deStrtDt
A/v
(l) Describe soecial energency services that rnignt be required
r
~-X1//rl1 /N
6
' • SPOxA7fL Qr'PL80lI(eNSlL 09,pLPANR , .
(uAf 107-11-960) Secclon 11 10.230(i)
E. VMIRON!¢WCAL GLi?CM4':5 (concinued) Lvalwtion ior
Agenc7l Use Ortly
EIlVI0.0ttfE:r'AL HeAL'A (continuad)
(2) Proposed neasures to teduce or conrrol eoviroaoeaeal health haiarda, lf •07
D Noi se
(1) VT+a[ c7pe• of eoiss e:isc lo the acea vhich way ♦(fact rour projeet (lor dsauple: tratltc,
aQulpaenc, opecatioo, otAer'
r ~
~ i s rr nr Lro~1 c-
(2) uTut qpes aed level• of noise vould pe eruted D7 or •"ocLted vitt+ the peojetc oo a
•hort-teco or a long-csro e..i• ifor ezaaple: crattic, cocrcruction. operation, oclvr>' isdicsce
vhat hour• nolse vould come (ro• the slte. AA~~
~}1~ ~r~. C v1n.S rl~vc.rl vr~i ~f= -~t~ N~o-~ -
(7) Proposed oeasure [o teduce or control notse tepiicts, t! •ey
8 W:D AND SNOREt2'te USE `_j-~
a v1+at 1• the current w e o( the aite •nd adjaeeac prope[cies' ~ IQSAd
#%W1J; - L&OA1 Lr r
7 ~
D. lU• the •lte been usad for •grlCUlture' It •o, dssetlbs
~c..~ .
~ 30 'S 'T, 13 1
e Oeser Ee ~ny •cruetures on chs •it• ktm5nj ~
olot 1 r~ t ~-n 1 ur► i~
,
d Vtll any scructures De deie ! hed' It •o, vhich' L 1 S JZv~~1
L1 I c~"t Lr ~ .
n V'►at 1s the cvrrent sonin` classificatioo oI tAe aitel
[ WT►at 1o the curree[ empreRoaslve pLo designatioo of the •Lte'
g. it •pplicable, vhat 1• the cursent •horeline saater progr}a deeigeutioo ot the •iti'
/ ~
h Has anl poct ot the •Ste been classl[!ed •s ao 'aovlroorenca117 armltlve- •rea' If so,
•petLfy +,I . 1
Ald 7- alll - • /PT (/V ~
A 4"
/215
5v lE teride or voCk in the comDleced qrojeet?
i Appro:lnatelr hw maoy peo le vou
~ v r iq s
7
~ SlOfJ1ltL QIPIYAWCEH= ORDINAMGZ
(uAC 197-11-960) Secttoo ll 1.0.230(1)
S BRVIROMiLRfALl. CLZ2RT5 (eoncLcwd)
/ !valwtlon For
Agency Use Only
) Approxloacely hov aany people vould the coopleted project disp Lce'
r 7
k Proposed seasure• to avotd or reduee dlsplac m eat impacts, 1[ •ny / V Aq
I
1 Proposed measures to ensute the proposal 1• covpatlbls vlth e:lscins aod Dro}etted Lnd use• aod
plans, i( •nr• _
~0
1
9 HOUSING
Approxlaacely hov oany unlc• vould be providad. lt •nr} Iodicat• vhatM r h1gh-, •lddle-, ot
tov-lncooe Aouilns
b. Appro=lewtely Twv aAnr unlts. i[ arty, vovld be elid oatedt iodi ute vlrt M r high-, alddle-, or
lo w lncoa• Aouslny
3 -t
vh c o W)
c ProposeA measures co raduce or eorttrol houslns lopects, tI aor'
/Y o T" Sv~= .
10 A£STIIETIGS
• Nhat 1s the tallest helghc ot anr proposed stcueture(e). oot includlnl •oteemasi Vfut to che
prlncipal e:cerlor Duildi d eaterial(s) proposed'
b Irhac viev• ln thc lmmediate vitlnlty vwld Ee •lteted ot obatructed'
c Proposed measures to reduce or cone[ol aestM cie Lapaets. lt soy• _.A16W
r
Ig G zo A/aryA.
11 LIGII7 AND GUAE
• 'R►+t trDt ol 116At ot S L re vili t}w propoaal produee' af+at time of day vauld tt malaly occur•
/Yti! "
D Could lighc or a L re troo the llnlshed projsec b~e a aatetr 1ucard or ioterters vich •ia.n1
ND
c VTuc e:lotlog otf-site •ource• ot light or a Lre may a(fact your proposal?
/V V/Y l~
/ \
d Proposed measures to tedute or coecrol 11gAc od Slare Lopacts, Sf aey.
8
~ SPO'[ANL MqVLRONMEN'CAL ORDIAwHCE
(VAC 197-11-960) Sectloq 11--30 230(1)
D CWIROFdQ1TTAL LlMa`fT5 (coociourd)
Evaluatton Fnr
Agency Uee Only
1: RPCAEATLON
Al vhat deslgnated •nd intoewl recruciowl opyorcunltte• •re in the lanedtate rtclnltv'
~Lrl c_
b Would the proposeC projeet dlsp L ce •ry e:istlag cecceAttoeal u6e6' Lt so, descriDe
ey a
c ProposeE oeasures co reduce or concrol lapaec• oa reer u cioo. locludins recreaclotil opporcual-
ties co be provlded tr/ the proJece ot •pqlleaac. L( •ny•
13 HIS'OAIC AND CULTURAL PRLSCflVATION
a Are chere any piaces or oDjsets llsced on or proposed [or eueloeul, •cat• or loeal presarve-
tton registers knovn to be o0 or aezt to ct+e elca' I[ •o, Qsoetai17 deacribe
b Generslly dascriDe •ar landoarks or evidanee of Rietorle •rchaeologtcal, acieoc::lc or cul;.,-a1
toporeance lcaovn to Oe on or ne:t to the site
t#V
c Proposed vaasures co reduee or concrol Sopac u. if •eT
14 'FAttSPOR'A7ION
• Idenci[y publlc •treets •nd hiEhwys •ervinj ths sLte and deserlDe proposeG aceess to :he
eitecing •treec systea. SToron atte p L na, lt •ny
S~ ~ V1 1 N ~j~' r ?Ty
! J Lf..Y
b ts site turren[ly •erved by pub !c tCaa~lt' If not, ylut lo the approiloate d:ocanee 4*h
enarest Craas1C stop• r c. ltov sanr parf~ing space• vould che co~pleted pco~ec ' liov saay vo~ald ths proyeec eli!Y OT" ycrT-
d vill che pro➢osal reQuire •oy oev road• or streeta, or impron wota to •:Isting road• or •treec$
not tacludlog drivevaysT It •o, geaerally deserlbe (Lodtuce vlrtM c pubilc or ytivote)
/Y f )
e Vi11 ths project use (or oceur lo tAa tmmediate riclolt7 0l) r[aT, rail, or air craw portatloo'
i( so, genscally descrlbe.
N U
9
~ . ST01(ARL LHQIA.dHlQNC>L.fl@DL!{tWCZ . .
(YAC 197-11-960) Saetloo 11.I70.230(1)
D. LNVIROI!@r•.AL Q,QqE1T'$ (conttnwd)
t•alwcion for
Ageocy Use 0017
f Naw sanr vehicular trips per day vould De Qenerated by the empleced projett' I( lmova.
lndlcaca vheo peak vould occur .
~ ' ~~~r~~6r!~C~id~ ( • 70Gr
~ ~ ~ ~
Pro o. d veasuras co reduce or eontrol cYan•~rtatinn imVaet•. !t •cy'
1.
8 D
15. PUBLIC SERVZCES
a 'JOUId the pcoject cesult !e an locru sed o+ed lor pu5lic seniea• (tor esasplc, tire protectioo,
police pro[ectioo. hea1tA care, schools. ocher)t Lt so, ;enerally descriDe.
1,L)
b. Proposed oeasure• co reduc• or concrul dlrect laqacc• oe puElic •arvle•s, i• •nT:
NIT
lb l.:itM£S
a Ctuj~ ~u~LlSt-l-e rr t-1 ble st the •ice. ric rlclt ~ +atur-l telu~j celephooe •~aitar7r •er. septlc eyaces, o-.- ~ 4~
" `
D Oestribe the uci11t1es that •re ptoposed Ios the projecc. the uclllt7 provldioa thd secvles aad
the :ener&l coeuctvetloo •ccirltles on che •it• ot ln the tardtsts riclnlt7 vhlel+ a1ght be
neaded i %
- i .
C SICNATIIRL
the undersignad, sve&c uoder the perulcy o( pet]ur7 chst the abo+e rempaores acs u&da ctutAlu117 and to the besc ot ey tnovledge Ialso
understand tluc. •lould tAere De •er vtlltul nlsrepreseetatloe o[ vlllfu.l Ltk of [ull disclosure oo ry parc, the •ReneY M&y vtthArov any
deceralnaclon ot ocuL t[leaace clut it sighc issue !e rellaoee upoo chi• ei+oetlist.
o.ce ~ _ . Propo ac (
(Plmut trint o[ Type)
Proponent• Mdseu. P/,
(SiQcLCUCe) IJ
Phons. ~ yb 7a
Pecaeo coaplacing toro: SG('T'wn-U~ Oate:
Phone . JAf~~1_1~, Z 7 ~ ~V P?
POR STAT1 OSC OHLT
Staf[ oo ber(s) revieving ehetlclist:
Daaed oa thls scaif revlev of the eovirottveotal ehecklist and otl+er pertlnent 1alo nstloa. the sta[t•
A. Coaclude• tlut there •re no probable s!`alflunc •dverme lapacc• aad recammLeods a deteraloatlon ol nooslgniflc&nte.
6. Coetludes chat proDable siga1[icant •dvacse envlronaeotai lmpact• do exist foc tf+e curreot yroposal and rscouaend• • nltlaateE deter-
oloAtloa ot oonmignitlu oee vi[h cooditiorv.
C Conclude• chat chera •re pcoEable algnitiun[ adverse nnviromental layatts •od recomeods a dececaination ot slgnificsnee.
TILIlIG iSt - 05.00
10
~
, •
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
rlEC'EIVED
SPQ}4ANE CUUNly ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
,nll_ 17 1991
PA RT I
aNisiONAF~~OWN NFORMN TION
`•?1'.
Legal Owner ~TCY ~ Pto!~LD -[LC-se ,5-c- ►t~u r Z
Mailing Address &j. I I 3Zv k#5~7~ 0Z.
City SPo 1cA-rv E' State Ve/q . Zip Code qq ZL$
Phone 46`i - (Work) (2-~- - (Home) Fax
Applicant/Agent *TL-Q-F- -sGaimy9.ujL 56 S AS ~c-"l?~ Td1l C,
Mailing Address ~ ZaZ 7M(:-j!4 I
City t`= State __koL/9- Zip Code q9ZD
Phone Llin - $2aD (Work) N- 10 (Home) Fax Z.y ' IZ.5!5-
(F APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN WNER AUTHORIZATIOOR APPLI ANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE ~ ru n 04,y-
bW ~
c.vv.k ro.ck
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft 3$.(nO ' et Iou0 5 = TOTA L 57L00 S.F.
Kz
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft )
Assessor's parcel numbers of project/proposal 4,52I Z. 13Y ~
Assessor's parcei numbPrs of adjacent area owned or controiled
Street address of proposai S, IZ I V/11 I V Fe S l T`K
Existing zonE classification(s) and date established U R 3.A:;
Existing use of property 1:S j61s7n L,t= Flo4wtI LY -
Proposed zoning
Comprehensive plan category U 2 f3 School district C' ~►'~tOU~
r-~nl iVo . 3s u
Water purveyor YYIO D ;:7 l, ~116 Fire district 1~ n. I
Proposed use of property.
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings ~ p r
Manufactured homes ( ) usiness ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Other Descnbe
Ust previous planning division actions involving this property LVuwi= T14t~4T Tw~ 140wnW0,
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
Location of proposal S,`1 Z I 1) /U 1 Ve- 2 S I Tq
Section Township Z5 Range yy
Name of public road(s) providing access Un! I vir-luS i TY `7 rf 6 V 1: ~ rlt
Width of property froriting on public road -7 T4 &AL(,= Z I S~41-
~ T" /3UC=
UNIVe7QSIl'Y 2- 6 o ~ f/
-
►
ZONE RECLASSIFICATivN APPLICATION PAGE 2 of 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yesx No
Name(s) of arterial roads VN l U&►'S i TY
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposed
Pa.►,~~,1 ~ 4 5 2~ Z, t 3 y~'a ~
~
oPP ~ q~.c~-~ su [3 Iqs L 1-$ Q y
JPc►ac" sd cul!5-~
~
MP Q r ~a is lq L 9
Existing zone(s) ~ to proposed zone(s) (1Z ZZ
for the foliowing described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below 5(Ejc
If you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it?
.
POW c ell ~I S Z I Z . 13 ~ ~ Cvh„~`y~~ IL0 Po rrit-~rmt ~
~
PrMr c_e. amm~ C,
What are the changed condi ions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
I
r S b
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adJacent properties?
c~b tj~J' s4- v-a-ced- Lcrt
f'qm I c '1 (.A/ r Micyp
p
What factors support the zone reclassification? rf%,A A ./1 v~
~r. lop ~.v ~25 ► r- p .
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
, L~ r I rv\Q~,Y ~ I 1 ln/ i, I C. Qlts i l jt"- 0 r' ~t
a4
C44% n. ri S r _
V
. .
. •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 3 of 4
PART II
This section of the application will provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal
to the Division
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A This proposal is within Fire Protection Distnct No i
B. Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and faci ities for fire protection purposes.
C Recommended fire flow % 8, or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive, and will be de ermined at time of building permit application
D Requirements include T-
5•C.~.D.~ , 7//6A97
Fire District Si re/Title Date ,
WATER PURVEYOR
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements (hav (have not)
been made. B Requirements/comments
~
MA
T
Water Distr ct ,5ignature/Title Date
`
`tOUNTY ENGINEER ~
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed with the applicant
A Comments ~
w ~ -
ignature/Title Date
"GOUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is
A C o m m e n t s iN5i1.~c aA L2 OZe'h14 P- D U. A
Signature/Title ~ ` Date
REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT ~
A preliminar-y ssion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
jksvio)have not en satisfied
. •
A Comments •
Signa re/Titl . Date 7/ 6 f~
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant
A. Comments AVI-4-4, L51e
Signature/Title ~ Date
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PaGE 4 of 4
PART I I I
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
i, the undersigned, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the information requested for the
zoning map and written legal descriptio
Signed _ t,~.~• , ) Date +-/165
~
Address ~ /o/v T. Phone 6709 - 4L7 -/-~95C~
City Avo &AV F state C.J9 zip 9906e
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
trtathfully and to the best of my knowledge.
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identified land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewith is written permission from the
owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf.
Sig ned S- SG H rn r4 vcL., Date 7~~f
Address /C _ Phone SZ)j - 6 ZY '/v/g ~iy 6? -8ZlC) OAM)
City State . Zip Z
~
Signatur of applicant or r(/
e,"sentative Date
State of Washington )
) ss.
County of Spokane )
Signed an swor or~ irmed before me on this day of , 19
,
by
Notary SeaLY1~.~~; , ~t~1 ~
EttR in nd fclr/the State of Washington residing
E. Notary p~bli c
~~,~~I►. . . . . . F ~i
. /
olon at
•t'
~ ci~ NOTAR y~`" M y a p p o i n t m e n t e x p i r e s
~ • •
~ pUrl ~
O
;O
P A RT V
,
TO 8E COMVI~"HE DIVISION OF BUILOING ANO PLANNING
' ~ .
Date submttted 1 ~File number
Date accepted By
r:6J,
~
~ 0
Total fees ~ , : Receipt number 7A
„ 1
~
PREI REZOtrt APPI YUS ~W
JUL-08 97 ~3:37 ~ FROM: SDS%~&~1 S0'3-5^'41255 TQ:5~94678189 PACE:02
• i r . ~
z
Fhail . .
cxcrcise iis rights under this peragraph, ►1 s" o diligently. detend, p.
roscwte or cor"-xv` ~ v litigation. ' y' ~•Q~•~~~~ •y
.
~1- ~4.-TZ7t_ - . - . . . _~..,.-w+.~~ w,...~ .i..~._..~..~..~..w cw~,r...........-.-._..~
AI.rTA OWNER' S POLICY
3 CH E A D LE A
Arnount of Ynsurance $76,000.00 Palicy Na. Z-181124
Premium $421.00 Order No. JB-181124
Date of policy November 15, 1993 at 8:00 a.rn.
1. Name of xnsured:
STEVE D. SCHMAUTZ and TRE3A R. 3CHMAUTZ, husband and wife.
2. The eatate or interest in the land described herein and which is
coverEd by thze policy a.s:
FEE 3IMPLE ESTAxE.
3. The estate or interest referred to herein ig at pate af Policy vested
in
. ' • . ' . ~ ~ . _
• THE NAMED INSURED.
:M~ =1~ t. • j ' ' ' r~ ~rv ' i~ ~ ' „ , ~ • ~•v~~ + r ' • ~
j . ~ ' ~ • . ~ . ~ , ~ :t~ . .
4. The;;,- landi: referred..,::ta - in . thie:~:policy.•. is ' gituated in the 8tate of
Waehington, County of Spakane, and ig described aa► followe:
. ~ a
, ti ~ ~~L. , .,w In~ ~~.',~f~~'tnlC C: ~ ,C ~`\'f•:~_~~_Cr~ 'c• ~ti..•{1~S ~2j? S'-` nr jst~.fi..)li,•'r . ; ~
Lota. ;.7 and ~ 8 ~ iri 816ck_ : 4 'o fr~r. OLD%.* 4RCHARD3 , SUBDIVISI49"' aa • per• * plat
thereof•'.-recardedh;in Volume^-:3°rof.~-Plate';' page.11; ' . • t m(' ne '1- ~
' EXCEPT,nthatp; portYOn canveyed- ter Spokane Caunty-'• by-' deed .*-recorded: on
November 15•1%*. 1990;t, under-_ Auditor'sM E'ile'•No":'• 9011150202; ~ • ~`A~
, r..'~~.~.. ~i ~f.:~ G` ~ ' . .~ti ~ . , • 1ri• ...n v( ~r ~.t. ~ . i~ 1[ ~ Mf ' . . ` . • . ~ .f . '
r
situater:in,the•-Caunty of Spokane, State of Waghingtan.
~
~ , • ~ . ~ t.. . .
' rL, t~ 'e~ .:ti 'i. . , i • ~ . . r~ ~ , 5 i' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ru~.. ,
~ i
;~f ~ . ~,y. „ ' • • , ~ . . . . ' C' • ' . .
. • • - •
~
J 1JL -C70 1 J ~ f a GJ rr[{J1 1 1 R!"'If=(V}y f 1 U!4 ju f] .0~7
C
.
. ~ + y J
. ~
TRANSNA,TICaN TITLE COMPANY
SPOKANE P ROFERT Y PROF=L E
- OWNERBHIP INFORMATxQN
L
Pri2•Cel :45212 1349 B1dgNo: Tvtal ro141OOa -
Owner : CooK G H Land 1$100000
CoUwnrar : 3txuCt :
S ite : 729 B UN IZTERS ITY RA SFQKANE 99 2 0,6 tImprvd :
Mail 52 E EVERETT AVE BPORANE WA 99207 8ahool :S0356
Phane :509--489-6239 Exompt s
Map/Grid:_~ qq Type :
8ldq Use: TaxDlstiCLNTRAL VALLEY
NrbrhdCd:OPOR3 , 1997 TX:$168.89
LAt'ld UB 8: 910 0 VACANT,UNDEV'ZLOPZD LRND TaxRatet t. 013 9 3 7 4 9 0
Leqa $:21 T:2S R:44E Q:NW
~ . ~ Cenaus molo
; . Traat 126.0 81ock 2
TaxPayRx' : COOX GI,AIN N
PROPERTY CHARACTERISTIC8
Sedrooma : Livable5r; Lot ]►arss t.44
TotlBatha: Croas BF : Lat Sq Pt : 1.9, AAp
HalfBaths: Semt t t ' Lot Qimsns:100 X 190
Ful lBaths: HsrntFin Gaxage SF :
A1r Cand : storiee : Ga=aqa :
HeaCing : Attia ~ Dock 8P' t
xeat5ouro: puality : i Pmti4 6F :
F'ireplace: Condition: ' porch sP :
Rng/ Overi : H ldq Mat 1: ; IFtRTaX :$163 ._5 0
TrashComp: Style : . s1iTax 410.00
Dishwuhr : RoolCovqx: ! IPLTax =
aarbgDiep: Roof9hmpe: ~ AQTax :
Intercom : Ext. Wall: ~ Year 8uilt:
vacuuza : Interior : ~ Total units:
F1oorCovz : Fotindatn : ~
TRAIr"9FER INFt?RMAT'YON
5ale Cate : E TAx1: Previous Bale:
DoGvment 0: LO~tn : Prsvious $ :
sa ].a Pr iao : Type Pr Oacuiaent :
Dead Type : Lender: 8ellcr:
~
- YRANS1iATION Tm iHSURJINCE C0.
rhe zntormation providpd xa Deemad R41iabla; Sut Is Not GUararitsed. ~
~
1
1SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PARTI
A. GENERAL INFOR{VIATtON
Legai Owner tTCV l-: Pth+ Q 17P-&:5; $'c. rt v" ►olu T"? .
Mailmg Address & I I 32-o kw-Tt-t 1' De.
City SffijQpr.*N E- State \616R Zip Code 95-ZL$
Phone yto"'t -Z_~_ (Work) (27-%- - (Home) Fax
Applicant/Agent !5T-V -'!~a+ w► a-_uTZ 0 r"r -T~C~
Mailing Address E ZaZ TQ„I:-n; City t= State __\p[& Zip Code _qq ZD2~
Phone y b1 '$2aD (Work) - 0 licOll (Home) Fax Z~ ' I
(F APPLICAN7 IS NOT OWNER, (NCLUDE WRITTEN NER AUTHORIZATIO OR APPLI ANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE bW yV-d riv h04r
.L„"kr~-
Pro}ecUproposal site area (acres or sq ft } 3 60 ~ 1~1rDU0 5 rF = TDTZ4L
~ ~
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft )
Assessor's parcel numbers of project/proposal t 2. . 13Y ?2
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled
Street address of proposal
Existing zone classification(s) and date established l) Existing use of property -$1iY17, Lk= 1EWwl► LY ~ D1lE-LEX
Proposed zonmg V t ~Z--
ComPrehensive plan category U2,RIa6 School district C ftj JJaAtn- /v o . 3 J~o
Water purveyor Mo P_~~ 1 Sr33 Fire district
Proposed use of property:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings ~ p r
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Other Descnbe ~i~.v~
List previous planning division actions involving this property rVUrvs
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INF(7RMATION
Location of proposal S,'1 Z( Q&1.VER SLl:~
Section Z~ Township Range LO V1/ yq)
Name of public road(s) providing access UN ► UUk/S i T Y. Tl'~ AV.~'~ T!t /v~
Width of property frontmg on public road ~ T4 ac- Z I 5J
~ T If tiuc= t~-
~
UNIViFQ51 1'1' 2.60
~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC... APPLICATION PAGE 2 of 4 i
> Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? YesX No
Name(s) of artenal roads VN i UGrS i7'y
Legal description of property for each zone reciassification proposed
IA/VG[iI ~45 2 t I. )
/
oPP osu ~ct-~ Sv Q ~ Iq5 l. 7-$
C221' usD oizc.i i5-ALa 13 ! q L 9
Existing zone(s) to proposed zone(s)
for the following described property.
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide belorrv.
If you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it? ~
.
PoM C & 45 Z( Z. 13 q-b.~ Cw,&~ ILO 1' r~~t ~
64, A Pw~ z. 13~ ' a ~
What are the changed condi ions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
~ • ~
r S 6 5L2~Ud Avd d ,f -
~
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adJacent properties? T -dy'y0L
i~- dd bvi" ' s 4-- va~c.od' C.crt r *e6 q
rw,w c P v~ ~ Jl-ld ~ I., ~.hJC1(e~~ Yl. 1~ ,
~
What factors support the zone reclassification? TKp tfl^A . /1 vc- o (A I LLe-25 I r f' _
~
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
w I, ~ G ' ~ ~ I•~ r• aLt CW~P/~
S 00 _
V
•
~ ' ' ► `a ~ , e
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ArPLICATION ~ PAGE 3 of 4
4
PART II
This section of the application will provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified.
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal
to the Division
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A. This proposal is within Fire Protection District No
B. Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes.
C Recommended fire flow ; or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive, and will be determined at time of building permit application.
D. Requirements include ,
Fire District SignaturelTitle Date
WATER PURVEYOR
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements (have) (have not)
been made.
B. Requirements/comments ,
Water District Signature/Title Date
'tOUNTY ENGINEER
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage hdve
been discussed with the applicant.
A Comments I
~ I l r I n
7-jL9 - ca
ADate
"COUNTY UTIUTIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is
A C o m m e n t s 14v.51V:65 OA 12 OweneiM P- r> 0. .4~,!-~? .
Signature/Title Date
REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRlCT
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied.
A. Comments ,
Signature/Title Date
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and genera{ requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant.
A. Comments r=~T,~'vGi!/.~.~5 ~js.~ vv~~ To ~'ou•v>>' ~Fv~~
Signature/Title Date
RECF T PT SUNIIMARY
~
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9701193 DATE: 07/16/97
APPLICANT: STEVE SCHMAUTZ PHONE=
ADDRESS: 11320 PV KATHY DR
SPOKANE WA 99218
CONTACT NANqE: STEVE SCHMAUTZ PHONE=
TRANSACTION: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPL SIGN-OFF (ENGRS & UTIL)
DOCUMENT ID: •1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS: FOR PARCEL #45212.1348
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 100.00
TOTAL DUE = 300.00
TOTAL PAID= 300.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
07/16/97 00006462 3135 300.00
PROCESSED BY: KATHY CUNlNIINGS
PRINTED BY: KATHY CUMMINGS
THANK YOU ************,t***********************
PERMIT CENTER EAST PASSPORT
Date: L
Number:
Name Phone r
Address
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTIlVG
~ -~J r . .
`c t'*{+1
~ltioR ~y~I - rr . .
+ T ~l ,l} ti 19. ~ti
{
V
~ Addrcssmg PeRnit Review APProach Pernut
~ Building Pernut Shareluies lnfo. Flood Plain Pernut
a Code InfotmaUon Short Plat Info. k ~ Public/Pnvate Roads
~ Commercial Revicw Subdrvision Info. Res. Bldg Pernut Rev.
Conference Temp. Use Pemut Site IJrainage Info.
Fire Saftty Review Variance Appl. Subdivision Revicw
Manufactured Home Zene Check Uti1Ry Pertnit
~ Mxhanical Petmits Zoaa Info. Z.oae Ghange Review
Plumbing Pemuts
~ Private Road lnfo F~ NOFEEREQUIRED
Reviewtr Time Out
- ResidenLal Rev1ew
f L .f ft ~ t
~ VeWer •ennit7 l • ~ • ti{ siT~yy1Tf~~f~~JT11 •f1x+ ~
~ Infocmation Subdivision Review
~ Admin. ExcepUon U1.iD/Stwar Info.
~ 8inding Srte Plan Info I Zone Change Review
~ Cert Of Exemption
Comprchensive Plan NOFEERE'QUIRED
Reviewcf Time Out
erm
~ Cond Use Perm~t 9
fi
.
~ Cntical Ateas Wo
~ Nonconfomung Use
ND FEE REQUIRED NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewer Tune Out Rexiewer Time Qut Reviewer Time Out
I ~
,
ti
P • • ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ v 4 ti ~ r + ~
~y
t p ` r 1`°
PERMIT CENTER EAST FE E SCHEDULE M
~<v FORRATI`'%
rr~~. r ~x {
D[YiSIt7MOC' BUILD(NG & FLAi1JNINC
SEQI1f UNITSICOST I DESCRIP'I'ION UF WORK
' f V M1 f {q~n 1
281 1 $58 lCertificate of Excmption ~ Are-1978
~ ~~y y sr]~h4
291 1 $87 1 ~ Qetween 5& 10 Acres ,R"CUPT#a<
301 1 $87 1 lMinor Lot Line Adiustment
311 1 $76 1 ~ All Others COMMEIVTS
79 I $58 lConditional Use Permits - Renewal All BUILDING & PLANNING
801 1 $397 Conditional Use Permits ~ All
B361 $75 Environrnentai Checklist ~
60 $70 lHome Profession Permit ~
137 $35 lPre-Conference Fee - Conditionat Use, ITemporary Use, Variance
61 ~ $262 iTemporarv Use Permit ~
73 ~$621 lVariance - Before or After Construction ~ I
~ti }rti ~ ~ r M1 k}1xi~ r L¢~ }ti r titi
DIY~Srt~N d~` ~AIGI'N~MNG CNGINEER'S
E01 1 1 $30 lAdministrative Variance I
E02 1 1 $50 lAppeals ~
,
' ~ %
~
}i r }
z-;r, s ~r~w~ahti.f ,r
% ,
FAS 1 $50 IChange of Conditions Plat
E061 1 $50 1 ~ Zone
E07 1 1 $50 IConditional Use ~
E26 ~ 1 $30 IDesign Deviation
E24 ~ 1 $75 lEnvironmental Checklist ~
q /~(~~I . ti~r~ sr %
~f/rr L f f f $ Z1 y l ~ r5} ~1i/1i~~►li~~~ L ti
: rrsiQ
r~ktir 1>r r
f r h~~tir $xtVV( V ~ [~L`O~{i ii ~ 9"oi•d r L t~. v titi ti~~ g'h~~
7►
~rr 1 r i } 4~
Eil r ~100 ~ ` ~ }{}hf ~ i tJ{'~f r ~.j ~rr%~}~rf t ~j 1~11 ~V O
%
~r $250, 1 > 4CurbC%ut
+ r . , k .r rtisha~
rf r, ~ r r r~ ~ - y~y~H~„
r r ~ vr ~
1$onds {)n(S Amt)
V,
E10 1 1 $200 lPreliminary Binding Site Plan ~
Ell ~ 1 $200 lPreliminary Plats ~ L.ong
E12 ~ I s100 I 1 Short ~
E23 1 ~ $100 1 1 ' Final
~~13r ' r ~1Q ~Spe~3al Permit. -
ti 1 L
%
!
` ~ 1Y11r'fJ t $301 ~I V ~~1WNW ,V~ wf a►,`VO• JIY g R.{ t of WQT y--ky1.11ti~ ~1 ~11 y'•} L
E15 $50 ( Variance ~ (1TILITIES
, % efb ~ $100 + ~brC ix~%Ri~h(-of-Way % : "~z~
1 ` \
1 ~1 L ~ y
~K1 ~1
~~ttsp. fe rr Without Permrt
E17 1 $200 IZoning Permic
E25 ~ ~$10 INSF Charge I
E28 IMisc. Road Fund (S Amt) ~
%
j)1_YjMeN;o1r'€.rrILrrlEs
r:-U01 ~ 1 $100 IPlanninQ Actions Within the PSSA ~
U02 I$25 IPlanning Actions Outside the PSSA
MASTER/PASSPORI BCK (1/9l97)
AWO ~
✓
ZE_48~97
T ,
"IN
O O O O
cc C'L a ~ A L L. E. ~
" ji ~ . , . • •;4 ~
N1 XON ~ - ,
cc a : x
~ } < ~ ~..~Ai ..t ~
~ ~ ►Yta ~ w . ~ ~ r.n ~a t ~-t a Av E ~ ' • lo,
2 ~ K s
~ :~•r,..
r J J _ ~ rt Rt~ct ~
C
Z v Fire \4~L. l96 ' ~n 'DEL,/9954
= ta'~ion
k C ~ .
~ S KA, COuNTY RO~.D N- 2 312+
7 {~+D
/►VE ~
> ~ .St P < p~k~R MlLWAUKEE RAILROAD
11
- ~ - - - - - -
~
- ~ ~ • ~,d `
rcJ Av 6
. ...•1 ~g ;
I F O V~ T N „ i~,.r ij1 F O V R TH Av
L...,
U ~
~
~L.
0 ` • w~J~1 ~ ~ i.u ~ O
s'rxTN
~ `-~`=`='L j
a , 7 T h S E V E N T H
H ~ ~ , v ,
Q J
V
3 L,L T E,y6-~T H AY
~vE 8
20 • ~
H 9 T F{ 9 r~t ~
r ; • ~ - ' t_.:.t~-l,' - - r ~ ~ .
dVr .li 10rn 10 7}i 10 T ~
i l
A VE Q 1 I TH
~ . , ..=1 ~ N
~ It TM - ~x• • • ~
Z QOa~u►+mr
~ , , . scHooL .
12 TH '
< Sc h~ 1~
r.';.y,r, "9 ~""L J o
cc
uY► t+ n Q . ~
O LTN, z ~ n o
ad h.
` o = T r • _ a ~
7H
~v I j~ ~ ~ :i 'f . ~1ti ♦ i' . ~
L 1991
T T►+
o Q~ . ~p ► ~ p . . . N .
~ ~ • q., J
T , . ~ . 19
= zQYH ~ r ,,r
` o )t
c
.c v ~ •
~ •O• ~ ' ' ~ • , J
~ ,r,stlNG Cw2g Cui $TH qVE.
C c, JE D
, f . . ~ r~►' ' q%l"
<4 r ~
7
N ~ . ~y_/l~~f!9/d1
acti! t '
~ ~s ~►~Lu~d ~.,~h_ ~s ~c~~v~
> f!D .w.ryGr
NORTH
,o
. ~
SCALE: 1/4" 10'
S I TE r) A76 JOTA tr: 57 bOo 5,f. ~ j
A- ~c1,uUO
3 .5 . ~ - , { Z
FY i~rtr►Si~ I Fq Q I
t ~
QkPosm 7ov't E-Lvp- ZZ. ~ ~XISri~6 Cv~3 ~ C
P~nc'~o4=Q U~F ~ Q` Cur" ' I~ i
OL\
,0____~ ~-..-_.....I , , ~
sc e~e~l Eo r-&rrcF r J
VICINIYY MAP
' , .
pr.( ~ _ S~c 9_~I-~-=' 1 I~~4 I I~ I ~ v~ ■
1SJH
i ; ~ '•.h' S00 I J ° s ~~D~ I
• ' ~
lOCA
. ~ ' ° : : ' ~
i : • e I I ;
L.1 ~
/'iu/DostD Cu23 CuT ~
: ' - ~
• ~ S :1 I1~0 ~rl ~ 1 J ~
PCAN
~ , ft~
? • ' ' 31 DEW~L1C Ui oiLLJ, ~
' .
7TH AVE.
. ~
,
ZEmw48~97 ,
.
r r
O O a O cm A t_ t_ "N
oc►b+k'~ w CC
~ N l X O~ v ; x
M
w MA~ N
J < ' yC1 !
a AvE Ic ~
° ~ ►~.u► i w _ ' - 3 • ,•K ~s+~ ~ c
J Q R~~ERS~oc ~ k a ; 3 >
~
~s95
~FL. i9 N
Z oi F i r e
X t a~ i o+'+
COuNTY ROAD ht°- 2 312f
~ ,Im
AvE G
-o~ s E ouo M/LWAUKEE RA/LROAD ~
.St P
r, rcJ~
....,..~j ,
~ FoUR-rH Av
,
~FpuRTK 1►V~ ~C
. ~ ~"'u-~• ' ' T ~ ~ J O
ix .,5~► z ~ ui 3
.
~
? kT N
. _ _ . . - . .1 , . . .
,
y 5 E V E N~►~i ,
a N ~ T H r
E 1 G)-+? N
8 a~ ~ 8 TH ~ YN _ :.r, • ~ ~j~ . , - _
20 9TH 9T►{ .
evF 1 O . JO rN
ti"" 1 1 T H
~
a vE
SC)iOOn '
D 0 ~ 'r.;j • . ~ V x N ~
~ Z M ~n Q ~
4
o ~ ~ . t 3 0
0 a 2 [1
. _ . -
T N
L. 1991
,
~ 0 ~ , ~ • . - N .
~ ~ . . 19
v •
Z p r ►~t r . _ - -
r\ ~,O . . u[yv~Erv C►K,
n ~ p y. L T
J
~
I' ~.CCS~~FL7 E~risridvG cvi2g Cvi i~
8TH AVE. ~
~
St D c-- wALWL
~<<~
I ~
')iV ~~ONI C r-SiJI:.~.'~~~r
-P~-ecC L-HN_o 7-_6w. Nr o
NORTH HvwGyG!' ~S t.nt~~G~v.~<.~1~.`trs LL~NL I
~
70 ' o S?Ydm&dCl,r (
,o
SCALE: 1 /4" 10' . ~ ~
grA __TOT1aL.: 57600• S,f.
S I TE- D
h-
F`lISnYd C12DX'iEi='"ii~X 3•5,_ . ~ . ' `qQ,
f-RQPosIFp zae ~~z 2Z Z
PRoPo ;D N
0 m
l
! 6~ sc~~WFO FEKCE h ,
VICINITY MAP i ~l I I ~~G, :i I
_ • . - .:i:-
~`IF.-~
HMjw 11 qn;
, d.. • ~ ~ o . _ - - - ~ _
: ~oo i ~ : r ~
. : ~ : a. • I
PA RCC
~1b ~ iakh 1000'
.~1'_
1 ~ T~
h~1~' • i • ~ y ~ • I~~I.a I
Cvi ~
, ~ ,e rL,; • I
.
~s ~ . 2 Irj ~
p[4I
~ ~,~Fw►~~K .
> l'~
• ' I :~~V V 1
7TH AVE. ZE Li _ a~_
4 _
m't-Ai-~[-:101~:J1:31ial_-J]_9
~
141 A 1 iP l _C R s! _!k1 ~a1_jj xl
Mnp Parral Found_ 15212.1949 - 45112.13 2
at .i 4s ~.i3 s 4 Ziz. J310
4 12.131 45~2.13 ~ 41 2.13 1
1~01.105~ 2 13~7 .13 6 qS212.13'3
Yeor F:.~:~ Ratl: j- i 1 212.131 -~S'~l?.13 3 S 4i 1213~7
45 2.13
P.a.r 4~l2;3se A Z1Z.13~
4S 01.15~511 7 . 13t, 4S 2.13 2.13
~
o.~.,~,~ • :,11i~um ~ ; F.x
cau..M,~ _t r' 1.01.1 ~ ~ , .
i Q~ AAdmtt 43 011
12¢15 n rwstwoGD On zP3►Wrc wn Mi8 . ~ 43 12.13 S 45211342
- ~ ~ ~{q
sraa~a,... 14 20 1 .0 9-16 45 12.13 7 '15 1-45~12.1
xr s~~+ti=~rr fm -3 `'~11.1048 43212.1348 43~i2.13
45 12.13 2
.¢.i oo.. twainn qs-
4524;t.1 ; 4S~p 1.1l 4~12.13 0 2
s~ q, ~ 45401.1 WS 349
45~12.13
1_.,01 0_ t gt
'352 1.1 nkA 7
~ ~ d13.0
ya~ t~eo `-1 A 5204A101 1213M 213.0 607 43 3.061 413 060 ~1
Shuw
~ S =t?S'13.0
'21AIl6 -0 7 08
3 A 04 204 Ol 13.
45039028
~ as ~ l~1 i 43 .01 7 4K213.0609 13.06111 S21 9~30 9024
45 D1 6
4521 9 31
t1'244.01 ~213.0610
I I 1-0, 71
- I
I
I
.u
_t
I
_ . _ _
.
-
.
I
. . . -
,
,:~y w
a. . :>°.a:,. .eta,,,,,,, y"j ~5.;
.~W ~ ~ ~ Hb
+C ~ ~ wq~: . ~ P4 V• .wT:....
+b+x y~ y ..ia... . ~ ^.x"'. "mss.."...
r ~ ~ r , p. . t -m" , "
~r w .
fie ~ ~ ' . r ~
~ k.,
_ ~ ' „ . v ~ ~ ~ a w _ ,
~ ~
~ . u
s~ a xW ~ a.
~ „ ,Q ~ . a. ,,;c ffi„
~ ~ w' ;
..a d° ,M~,.~.. a ~
aF, - ~p Ps "
r a ~ k ~
, * a,:.
~ r, ~;~r~ , ,
<; a
s d m. rx ,,o«. , s. -ten
e.. 'q.; I
...r
e.
P 8T
. G,,
as;
;
srC ra'
gg . 4 ~
i •"r
~a~;
k~.:
J
4 '
e a ~
'M... t E
{
5
t..
a
~ w
t
~KK u '
F M
i
r .r. ~
S
w
x~ n is n q. q;
xv. ' S'.
x ~ r,. w w...;,
~x ' a~Y W. 'K. , r S
~ ~ r x ~r~~ p ~ v ~ n."1;
r r. i r.~ 4I M
N § $
s.':+ v
I 1 gg B