ZE-0010-98
RECEIVED spox:AM covrrTY aEARnvG F R Hov 2 3 1998
~~~ffiC*4M
RE Zone Reclassffication fram Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residenhal-22 (UR 22) to Regional ) CONCLUSIONS AND
Business (B 3) ) DECISION
AppLcant Crmg Catlow )
File No ZE-10-98 )
L S Y OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Apphcation for a zone reclassificabon from UR-22 to ihe Regional Busuiess Zone
for uses allowed in the B-3 zone
Decasion: Approved, subject to conditions
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Hearmg Exarruner has remewed the zone reclassificahon appLcation and the evidence
of rccord, and hereby adopts the followmg findings of fact and conclusions
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant/Legal Ow►ner Crmg Catlow Ageat: John D Konen
625 South Ridgemont Dnve David Evans & Assoc
Spokane, WA 99037 110 W Cataldo Ave
Spokane, WA 99201
Site Address: 302 South Pines Road
Location: The site is located west of and adjacent to Pmes Road just north of the mtersechon
of third Avenue and Pmes Road
Legal Descnption: The site is Parcel Number 45211 2603 and is located in the North half of
Section 21, Townshyp 25 N, Range 44 E, W.M m Spokane Coutrty, Washington
Zoning: Urban Residential-22 (tJR 22) The site is located witlun the Aqutfer Sensitive
Overlay Zone, the Intenm Urban Growth Area, and the Public Transtt Benefit
Area.
Compreheasirve Plan Category: The property is designated as Major Commercial in the
Spokane County CeneraLzed Comprehensrve Plan
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and De,caslon ZE-10-98 Page 1
Envimnmental Review: The Division of Buildmg and Planiung issued a Deternunahon of
Nonsigmficance on November 2, 1998
Site Descripbon: The site is just over 14,000 square feet w size snd is rectangular m shape It
is flat and contains an exisbng office buddmg with assoaated parlnng and landscaping There is a
dnveway located at the aorth end of the srte, wluch provides an access easement to serve multi-
farruly residences tocaied wes# of and adjacent to the site The site is adjac.ent to and accessed by
Pmes Road, which is a State fughway (SR 27)
Surroundiog Conditions: The Staff sets forth the surroundmg zomng and land uses oa pages
one and two of rts StaffReport and the Heanng Exanuner hereby adopts and incorporates that
hereun
Project Description: The srte is fully developed vath a two-story bwlding, landscaping, and
parlang The appLc,ant plans to retain the site as developed with a tenant who wM use the srte for
retad and office uses as allowed in the B-3 zone The site is served by all uhLties and facihties,
mcluding transit sernce
B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATTON:
Applicable Zoning Regulations. Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14 6281,14 804 120
and 14 802 0040
Hearing Date and Locahon: November 189 1998, Spokane County PubLc Works Builduig,
Lower Level, Comnussioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadaray, Spokane, WA.
Notices: 1Viailed Qctober 27, 1998
Posted 4ctober 30, 1998
Pubvshed October 30, 1998
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolutaon No 96-0171 (Heanng Exarniner Ordinance)
and Resoluiion No 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure)
Testimony•
.
Tammy Jones John D Koner, Agent
Di`nmon of Buddwg and Plarwng David Evans & Associates
1026 West Broadway 1 IO West Cataldo Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99201
C. ZONE RECLASSIEFICATION ANALYSIS:
1 Aoproval cnteria
In order for a rezone appLcatian to be approved, the appLcant must demonstrate that the
rezone bears a substandal retahonswp to the pubhc health, safety, or welfare Also, there must be
a demonstration that condrtions in the area have substantially chan$ed ssnce the last zomng of the
HE Findings, Conclumons and Decision ZE-10-98 Page 2
property GeneraUy, conforniance vf a rezone vnth the Comprehensive Plan results in thai rezone
havmg a substanual relationship to the pubtic heaitb, safety, and welfare Further, chaaged
circumstanc-es bave been found to be not es vnportant when the proposed zone change
unplements the poVcies of an adopted Comprehensive Plan
a The oroposal. as conditioned. aeneraUv conforms with the Spokane Gountv Generahzed
Comprehensive Plan. bears a substanUal relationslup to and witl not be detnmentel to the QubLc
health,-safetv and general welfare. and comQlie,s wnth the Spokane CQuqW Zotung Code and other
appltcable development regulabons
The Staff has anaiyzed the project's comphance with the Comprehensive Plan on page four
of its Staff Report The StaiTs 5ndmg is that the proposed zone reclassifiGation Ls generaBy
consistent with the Major CommercW category of the Comprehensive Plan The Heanng
Exanuner hereby adopts and incorporates those findings heren
b Condnions in the area m whuch the propertv is located have chansted substanhaltv smce the
proDertv was last zoned
Sechon 14 402 020 (2) of the Spokane County Code states that amendments to the zorung
map may occur when it is found that "Changes m eaconorruc, te.chnolagtcal, or land use conditions
have occunred to warrant modification " Staffhas usted in its StaffRepart on pages one, two,
and five, vanous condltions wluch have changed in this area swce the property was last zoned
Generally, those findings demonstrate thai there has been a gradual change along Puies Read in
the vicuvty of tbe proposal from ResidenUal and Office uses to a rrannge of Commercial uses such
as those aUowed m the B-3 zone Nwnbers of zone reclassifications to Business and Commercial
uses have been approved Also, Pines Road, wluch is a State highway, has seen uicreases w
traffic and unprovements Further, the avaitabiLty of pubLc sevices such as sewer, water, and
transit serrnce to the srte demoestraie that condiUons have changed to the extent that ttus zone
reclassificahon is warranted
IIL DECISION
Based on the Findings and Conclusion above, the above zone reclassiScation appUcabon is
approved, subject to the coaditions of the various pubhc agenaes identified below
Failure to comply wrth the conditions of this approval may result ui revocation of this
approval by the Heanng Exanuner This approval does not waive the appLcant's obLgation to
comply vrnth all other reqwrements of other agencies wrth junsdiction over land development
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND P G
1 The proposal shaU comply vath the Regional Susmess (B-3) zone, as amended
2 The appLcant shall develop the subject property generAly ui accordance wrthin the concept
presented to the Hearmg Exannner Vanabons, when approved by the arector of the Drvimon of
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-10-98 Page 3
Building and Plannng/demgnee, may be pennitted, uicludung, but not hauted to buddtng IocaUon,
landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pemutted zone All vanations must conform to
regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zonmg Code, and the ongmal intent of the
development plans shall be maintaur►ed
3 Approval is requued from the Direcior of the Dnnsion of Buflding aad Plarming/demgnee of
a specfic hghtuig and mgmng plan for the described property pnor to the release of any building
penmt
4 Direct hght from any extenor area iighhng fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
5 The Drvision of Bufldmg and Plannmg shall prepare snd record wrth the Spokane County
Auditor a Tide Notice, nohng that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
condiUons imposed as a result of approval of a land use acaon. Th,s Trtle Nohce shall serve as
pubhc notice of the condrhons of approval affecting the property m question The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released,
in full or m part, by the Divlsion of Bwlding and Planning The Title Notice shall generally
prowde as foUows
The parcel of property legally described as the east 135 feet of Lot 3, Block 3, first addinon
to Weldon's subdivision is the subject of a land use achon by a Spokane County Hearmg
Exanuner on November l 8, 1998, impomng a variety of special development condrhons File No
ZE-10-98 is availabie for inspection and copymg in the Spokane County D,vision of Buvdmg and
Planung
6 The Spokane County Divmon of Bwlding and Planrun$ shaU file with the Spokane County
Auditor, within the same tcme Erame as aUowed for an appeal from the final disposrtion, inctuding
lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notice, wfuch shall generaUy provide ss follows
"Pnor to the issusace of any buildmg pernut for any bwiding or any use on the property
descn'bed herein, the app6cant shall be responst'ble for complymg wrth the provtsions of the
Spokane County Zomng Code, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Senstive Area Overlay Zone) The
property wluch is the subject of tius noUce is more panccularly descnbed as foUows "
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERIrTG AND ROADS
1 The applicant is advised to consult wnth the Washington State Department of Transportation
concerning any requwed access pernuts or unprovements to Pines Road
SPQIi:ANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1 The sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utihbes, Spokane
County
HE Fmdings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-10-98 Page 4
3 Water sernce shaU be coordumted through the Director of Utjlmesy Spokane County
4 Water semce shall be by an exishng pubLc water supply, when approved by the Regional
Engtneer (Spokane), State Department of Health
5 A pubhc sewer system wiU be made available for the project and individual sernce wlll be
provided Use of an indMdual on-site sewage (hsposal system shall not be authonzed
6 The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolu'bited
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
I A wet (lrve) sewer connection to the area-wide Pubhc Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection pernut is requved CommercW developments shaU subaut histoncal and or
estimated water usage pnor to the issuance of the counecUon permit m order to estabLsh sewer
fees
2 The appLcant shaU subrrut expressty to Spokane County Diviston of Utdmes, under separate
cover, only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the pubLc sewer
connecttoas and facLbes for review and approval CornnercW devdopments shaU subnut
fustoncal and or estimate,d water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal.
3 Sewer plaas acceptable to the Drvision of UtiLties shaU be subnutted pnor to the issuance of
the sewer construction permit
4 Arrangements for paytneni of apphcable sewer charges must be made pnor to issuance of
sewer connection peniut Sewer charges may mclude special connection charges and general
faciLties charges Charges may be substantial dependmg upon the nature of the development
5 Any water service for this project shall be prowded in accordance vnih the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
DATED tius 20th day of November, 1998
Gre(g Srrnth `
Spokane County Heanng Exanuner Pro Tem
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-10-98 Page 5
• ~
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISiON AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APpEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County ResoluUon Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the demsion of the
Hearmg Examiner on an apphcahon for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
deternunation is final and conclusive uriless vntfun ten (10) calendar days from the Exarruner's
wntten decision, a party of record aggneved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Comnussioners of Spokane County, Wasiungton However, RCW 36 70B 110 (9)
mdicates that adnumstraidve appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shaU be fiiled
with the board of county comnusmoners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the
de.cision
This deaslon was maded by certiSied nafl to the AppLcarrt on November 20, 1998
DEFENDING ON WHICH APPEAL PERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGALLY
APFLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER NOVEMBER 30,1998 OR
DECEMBER 4,1998.
The camplete record m this matter, including tlus decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod
wrth the Office of the Hearmg Exanuner, Third Floor, Pubhc Works Bwlding, 1026 West Broadway
Avenue, Spoka.ne, Washmgton, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490 The file may be uispected dunn$
normal worlnng hours, Lsied as Monday - Fnday of each week, except houdays, between the hours
of 8 00 a.m, and 4 30 p m. Copies of the docwnents m the record wiU be made available at the cost
set by Spokane County Ordinance
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decimon ZE-10-98 Page 6
_ i
Enbineer's Review Slicct
t'rcIject Status Active
_ .As f3uilt Ptans Rrrcived Rezone F IfE' ZE-oO 10-98 '9s
ftoad Plans 4pprovcd
('ortpWuon h+les:
Nrw Ro:►d Standard.s 5-15-95 !►lylar s$ Rclatcd Fites
Neuring: I U18l1998 09:00 Ciuilding Dept:
I ccfinicai Rrvtew; 09;11?-1 998 02' 1 S 1arge Lut Eildg Squarc Frc! I
i'rchnunary Rrvirw: Type:
?vc►. I..nts: ;do. Acres c~
l;:itc kc:,c11'cd: 0E.,31~1998 Rnngc-Towrts hip-SccttOn: 43-25-21
Projccc 1anir UR-22 'I'O 11-3 Cr1TLOW 11-1OV1NG
ti
NAKCEL(S): (first 18)
Appljcant ti;::lle.!
Juhn Kunrn F7ood 'l.csnc No
L)AV1D EVANS & ASSOC1NC 14atrr Suurce Public
11(1 titi _ Cataldo Av Sewer Sourcc
Spol►anc. WA 94241 Schuol Dist 356
Nhonc I'ax Firc Dist
► ~ .
unc Uist
nwner
162 ~ S. i::~enh1r.t I)r
Vcradalc, tiV A 99037
Phnnc
U~flu11i`L' 1111. 4:,6- 3f,7i ('l'»iiilllij; 1'fl: C UIIIJt'1: i
D:lte
Submitted Ueseription Initials
L'tlg NCCd Df'JIRarC PIai1S En~t Ncrd Ilarvnr~i Rd tititigation
Eng Nccil Trafl'ic Analysis Eng Nccd OQirr
Eng Pay Frrs Rrcci~td Fng Firial Piat Fres Catrplcted
Lag Ynonty Fers Rec.eived Copy tu Accaunting
Notice ta Puhiic / Nobcc tu !'ubi~c # 1 3 4 b Ciirnplctr.d - or Ncrds tu bc signcd
[1r~;gn Dc,, iatio:i Uxxs (In-Out)
i '
- - - E;un quall Ics Ur
,.irainagr item catculatrti '
ifearmg Ur;c llcctyiun App ! Urri t'ond AppIJ !il'C '
:1ppCaled to BCC Dccisiun App Dcn _ Cond Arpid ('ourt ~
Anpcaled to CUUrt i?rcisian App Tk:n ('ond :tpptLl
-~,:emped Mylars to Scrrctar), tSandy i
, ~t:+n~~~c~1 ?'si I,t f'l:r- tic~r~::ir~ f~:,n~l~., •
J
.
. s
RFr.F:IILI=n
~
~ ao v 1 ~ 1998
A
1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEAR~ Wfifffm
H
FI LE # 2E 10-98
SPOKAM COUI~M DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
HEARING DATE November 18,1998 @ 9 00 a m FII.E # ZE-10-98
PROJECT PLANNER Tammy Jones, Associate Pianner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone reclassficabon from Urban Residentra!-22 (UR-22) to
Regional Business (B-3) on approximatefy 14,034 square feet for those uses allowed m the
Regional Business (B-3) zone
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed zone reclassification, as
condrboned
Project Data .
Project Locabon. The subject property rs aeneraiiy located west of and
adjacent to Pmes Road and approximately 100 feet
south of Sprague Avenue m the N% of Sechon 21,
Townshrp 25 N. Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washmgton
Parcel Number(s) 452112603
Owner Craig Catlow
1625 S Ridgemont Dr
Spokane, WA. 99037
(509) 922 2229
Agent John Konen
David Evans and Associates
110 W Cataldo Ave
Spokane. WA. 99201
(509) 327-8697
Comprehensive Plan Oesjgnation Major Commercial
Zoning The extsbng zonrng of the site is Urban ResrdenUal-
22 (UR-22)
Existini; Land Use Professconal Office
Surroundmg Zontng and Land Uses.
. Narth Zornng to the north of the site is Necghborhood
Busmess (6-1) establlshed in 1991, prewousiy
ciassrfied as Lccal Business (LB) m 1970 (ZE-3470)
Land uses to the north of the srte consist of retaiI and
commercial uses
• South. Zoning to the south of the sde is Neighborhaod
8usiness (B-1) estabiished in 1991, previously
ciassfied as Locai Business (LB) m 1968 (ZE-19-
iE-10-98
Staff Report - November 18, tSSB Heanng
1 of 5
f
68C) Land uses to the south of the site consist of
retaii and commerciai uses
• EasL Zoning to the east of the site ts Neighborhood
Busmess (&1) established in 1991, previously
classified as Local Business (L8) m 1977 (ZE-185-
77C) and Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established
m 1991, pneviously classified as Agncuitural
Suburban (AS) (ZE-171-55) Land uses to the east of
the site consist of muib-fami{y residences and
professional offices
• West: Zoning to the west of the site is Urban Residentia!-22
(UR-22) established m 1991, previously classrfied as
Multr-family Suburban (MFS) in 1966 (ZE-13-66)
Land uses to the west of the site consist of mulb-
famdy residences
Recent tand use acbons in Recent land use acbons tn the surrounding area
surrounding area inciude ZE-38-95, a zone reclassrficafion from UR-
3 5 and UR-22 to 8-2 located at the Northeast comer
of Pines Road and St' Avenue, and approved by the
Heanng Exammer Committee on October 20. 1998
Land Djvision Status The subject property is a legal lot of record See CE-
163-98(A)
Shoreline Designation Not appircabie
Water Purveyor Spokane County'Water Distnct #3
Sewage Disposal A pubiic sewer system is available to the site
Fire Distnct # Spokane County Fire Protection District #1
School District Central Valley School District #356
Nearest Arterial and Distance The sde is located west of and adjacent to Pmes
Road (SR-27) which is a State Highway
Neighborhood AssociaUon None known
' This proposal m focated inside the Interim Urban Growth Area► (tUGA)
• This proposal is located inside the Public TransportaUon Benefit Area (PT6A)
GMA/Crjtical Areas
Aqurfer Recharge Area i The subJect property is located withm the
Pnority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aqurfer Sensfive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone
Fish & Wildlife Habjtat ConservaUon Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
Cntical Areas Maps
Floodplain The site is located outside of the 100 year
floodplain
Geologically Hazardous Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
CnUcal Areas Maps
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
Cnbcal Areas Maps or Wettand Inventory
Maps
tE 1ass
Staff RegoA • November 18 1998 Hearmg
2 of 5
SEPA
Determinabon of Nonsignficance (DNS) issued on November 2, 1998
Comments penods ends cn November 17, 1898
Noticinq
Published The proposai was pubtished m the Legal Idotice section of the Spokesman Reenew on
October 30, 1998
The deadline for notifying property ownersJtaxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal wras
November 2, 1998
Site Posbng Deadline The deadime for poshng public nobce on the site was November 2, 1998
1724 ComQiiance Dates
ApplicaGon Aa:epted August 24, 1998
Techrncaliy Complete / Determinafion of Compieteness issued September 15, 1998
Date Nobce of Decision is due January 13, 1999
Reviewinq Aaencies
9 agencies were notrfied on August 28. 1998. and October 21, 1998 Comments were due on September
10. 1998 and November 4, 1998
Agencies Nobfied Response Date Agencies Nobfied Response Date Received Received Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes 10/29198 Washington State Yes 9/10/96
of Engmeermg, Deparbnent of
Transportation TransRortation
Spokane County Dnnsion Yes 8/31/98 Spokane County Fire No
of Engineenng, Protechon Distnct #1
Development Sennces
Spokane County DNrsion Yes 9/16l98 ~ 5pokane Regional Yes 9/10198
of Ubldies Health Distnct
Spokane County No Modem Electnc Water No
Stormwater Utilrty Company
Spokane County Division Yes 10122/98
of Long Range Planrnng
AgencV Comrnents :
Agency comrnents are m the fomn of recommended condibons of approval for the proposed zone
reclasstfication
Public Comments
No public comments have been received regarding this applicahon
Descriotion of the Site
The site is appnoximatety 14,034 square feet m size and is generally flat The srte contams an exrsting office
building with associated parkmg and landscaprng A dnveway is located on the north end ofi the site which
serves muiti-family residences located west of and adjacent to the srte The site Is accessed by Prnes Road
(SR-27) which is a State Highway Surroundmg uses include mulb-family residences, a stnp mall and a
vanety of comrnercial uses Pmes Road rs improved wrth four paved tanes wdh curb and sidewalk.
zE-ta98
Staff Repon - November 18 1998 Heanng
3of5
Backqround
The applicaUon for the proposal was submitted to the Diviston of Bwiding and Plannmg on August 24, 1998
A Technical Review meetmg was heid on September 10, 1998, and the applicabon was detemnrned to be
ptechnically compiete" on September 15, 1998 A Nobce of Applicafion was issued on September 15, 1998
with a 14 day public comment penod ending on September 28,1998 The exisbng zoning for the subject
property is Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)) establ'ished in 1991, and previously classified as Muiti-family
Suburban (MFS) in 1966 (ZE-13-66)
Staff Anatysis
Project Descnpbon
The proJect is a zone reciassificaUon from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Busmess (B-3) on
approximately 14,034 square feet for those uses allowed m the Regional Busmess (B-3) zone
Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is located wnthin the MaJor Commercial category of the ComprehensNe Plan The
MaJor Commercial category is intended to provcde the opportundy for development of commercial uses,
specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses, directty related to major
throughways The Major Commercial category wi11 be composed of three different types of commercial
development shoppmg centers, highway and artenal commercial stnps and freeway commercial Highway
and arterial stnp commercial areas wili usualiy be made up of busmesses on mdividual parcets clusteced
along a heawly traveled street or highway, each provided off-street parking
Goals, ObJecbves and Decision Guidelmes of the Major Commercial category that are applicable to the
proposed zone reclassificabon include Goal 61 to promote development of commercral land in a manner
which is complementary and compattble with adjacent land usss and the surround,ng environment,
Objectives 6 1 b, 61 c, 61 d, and Decision Guideimes 61 4, 61 5, and 616 These Objeciives and
Decision Guidelines encourage commercial uses that are supported by a fiali ime of public services, have
access to major artenais or highways, have public transit accessibility and provide for off-street parkmg
The subject property is located on a state highway and is served by a full Ime of public sennces mciudmg
public sewer and water, and public transit
The proposed tone reclassificaUon is generally consistent with and implements the Goals, Objecbves, and
Oecision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category in that the site adjoins a State Highway and rs seroed
by a fuil Ime of public services
Zoning
The applicant has requested a zone reclassificabon from Urban Residentiai-22 (UR-22) to Regional
Busmess (B-3) for those uses allowed in the Regionai Business (B-3) zone The purpose of the proposed
Regional Busmess (B-3) zone is to provide for the locabon of a wide range of retail and service acfivfies and
to impiement the Major Commercial category of the ComprehensNe Plan The intent is to implement
comprehensive plan policies which encourage commercial development along Prmcipai Artertals or
highways and establish regionai-serving commercial area General charactensUcs wdl include paved roads
and sidewalks, public sewer and water, and a fuq tine of public services including manned fire protect,on and
public transit accessibility The proposai is located adjacent to a state highway, is to be served by public
water and sewer, fire protecUon and has public transd accessibility
Site Plan
The site plan of record Iilustrates an exisUng one story 3,053 square foot office buiidmg with associated
parking and landscapmg The site plan also illustrates an access easement located at the north end of the
property that serves adjacent muiti-family residences to the west of the site The site plan illustrates the
required 5 feet of Type ill landscapmg along the Pmes Road frontage The proposed use of the bwldmg is
to be 50% office and 50% retail, and the required 12 parking spaces have been provcded for as specified by
ZE•10-98
Staff Report -(dovember 18 1998 Heanng
4of5
Section 14 802 040 of the Zoning Code Typicai signage detaii is provided and notes compliance with the
signage standarris specified by Section 14 804120 of the Zornng Code The site plan does not iliustrate any
propased additions to the existing building As proposed, the site pian of record demonstrates generai
compliance with the apphcable devetopment standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code and proposed
Regiona) Business (B-3) zone Detailed site plan review will be necessary to determme complrance w+th ali
applicable development standards and is rzcommended to be admmistrative review
Site Plan Data
Building Size 3053 square feet
Buiiding Height 18 feet
Srte Area 14034 square feet
Signage Per 14 804 120
Parking Per 14 802 040
Changed Conditions
Sechon 14 402 020(2) of the Spokane County Zornng Code states that amendments to the Zoning Map may
occur when it is found that uChanges in economic, technological, or land use conditions has oecurred to
warrant modificahon u Changed conditions m the area of the proposai inciude a gradual change in the
vtcmity of the proposai from residential and offfce uses to a range of commercial uses approvals of a
number of zone reclass,ficafions including ZE-91-81 C, ZE-1-86C, ZE-12-88C, ZE-51-$8C and ZE-88-95, the
close proximity of the site to an improved State Highway, and the availability of public services to the srte
Staff Recommendation
The proposed zone reciassification is consistent wrth the Goals, ObjecUves Decision Guidelines of the MaJor
Commercial category and imp(ements fifie purpose and intent of the Regionai 8usiness (B-3) zone 7he
Dtvfsion of Buildmg and Pianning recommends approval of the zone reclassification, as conditioned
Attachments
A Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Development Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
e Zoning
B Conditions of Approval
C Agency and Public Comments
z.E 10 sa
Staffi Report - November 18 1998 Heanng
5of5
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY MAP
SITE PLAN
COMPREHENSiVE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
. 8
.1Q
Z
. map
o ~
VJAiX ~N ~
r~rE yv1L0 1 ,
~ gUC.KE y~,..~tc~A p~ a~, ~ Z00
t"9 r
1,~O~TG~"-- . ~ ►
~ •
r.~
' < A f
~ c' N ~t ONK
r 11~AX ~N Sr►~` gpt~NE
' . ~ s:S W
27 pSA19o ~
1 ►1'~ t , ~ '~.O ~ e0 0 ~
~ i
1
~ ~ 6 i
~
0--~
BRaO,pWAY
~ E►'~.*~ ~ ?a+ s-,r ~ z v' ~
F
~
~„t A1N ~ - ~ ;N r ~
~ vx
• ~ ~ ~ <
61V A
• ° ~ ~ ' a ~ , ~ ~i ~ ~ Q '
oV{tZ
tSli p
~ R
lsTR ~
1 9M
7- .TM+
°Q
}7~8~
cs t 2
• ~ M / , G+ ~ ~ O 1
~ ~ 1 ~11 ~ x ■
+ =c wt ~ 17 7fJ~ t ~~r~,,~
• , 1 _"'"`-,~,~-`~f
45 ~ J 1
s"~qIRa ~ YI
V!E'iy
ParK . ~
18 'VrA a
~ %g
• 7 7 T
~
N'
~~~~8198
Not ta Scale
ZEml 0=98
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
~ f1a n a i r
- i
~tr~p
-
~
M1 S 51 O ~
. = 27
~ ~ ~
IF LJ~
~i
0
,
c N I Cz
~
~
o ~
- ° ell l sT
8 ~
w~
N N ~
~ ~ Ilo
~w
~2 p
c~ Z
,
11118i98 N'' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
Not to Scafe
• ~ ~
~
~
~ zoning
. _ . ~ ~
- g
~~~-o,~L9y ~ rs
4~
i35
-p12
n A- ~
~
3 ~Q
.~~~E~+~ q
~
< ~
' ~ ~ -LL ' ~ ~ ~ , •
4,768 2 °
' - Vg-~
~ 3O7155 ~ ~l Z osza 2 osss bg?.2.
.
aeo
~ 6 0539
~ 2r01 2
2
26 ~..r~ 2 0567 C 2
~ 1 2Ti2 ~ 2408 - - 2 0555 2 o.s8 -
~ 1366
c
~~ay ~9
A 2405 2 0540 OS'~y Z p
iVQ~ T 2 ry55
64 z409
_ 2 QS. a5~~
n ,
$-1 ~ oss z
a ~.13(4
55 _
2403 Vr t.~ ~ 4tl+ ~ Q,~,Q° •
1 2502 2 1620
` . . • S~~ 2 15 ` 7 ~ z .
' r 4th 1
726 2 1723 '~2 t 51$~~ ~
~ 2 t ~ 17 35 ~ 4 1621 2
« 1220 ` 1206 1736 x 2 15'9
2 1721 1 2 1622 a ~
viii„`t-.'vl2age... 2 ~40
r , 1223 21 T28 _ _ 2 2T4%
2 3001 'TS1-'
2 i729 2 2T02 2 34c
~i
* y~p ,X~.lajl ~j ~ 1211 1 1217
z S002
~06 ~ $'1 ~ ~C, 14 6 t '
1 I2c 1 ti2~'~,., 2 2 az
2 2¢01
~ 1225 2w2901
y 1225
1208
~
f ~ .
0+
~ ZONjNG Mp,P
N'
1111$ig$
Not to Scaie
ZE=1 0=98
Site Development Plan
~
-7/
v ~ ~ 2
N \
~
~ j L ro~wi 1e
6 • -,~.G,. ~ - - 25 ~ 2~ ~ ~
CvC
N
L o
.
X ~ ^r
~s A g~~D iE~~~ ~
~2~ b2~~'"a ~Ft 3Q
~ ~
lo 9 L'f
DCD~
I 4 ~ :2
~'1 ~ ~ ~ ~~_y•~ 4~ Q jPv.+ N `
ra ~s Yc~c~,, r~SD
;
•Q - - ~
t ~N ~<NN 2
i ~
y~ -'a••~ ~V ~ ~ y ~l
9 • ~
PINES ROAD _ _ ~
- - - - - - - -
--oMS+ce ~~ry~~
r' O » ~I~Y'I WL✓v
rfr^'~ = CA i LOW MOVING . ~ t,...~....,z ~
,
Not to Scale 11/18/98 N► SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP
ATTACHMENT B
CONDITlONS OF APPROVAL
~
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
► FoR ZE-10-98
.
Al d
SPOKA.t,M COUNn DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
,
1 The proposai shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, as amended
2 The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner Variations, when approved by the Director of the
Division of Building and PlanningJdesignee, may be permitted, including but not limited to
building location, landscape plans and general aliowable uses of the permitted zone All
vanations must conform to regulabons set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and
the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained
3 Approval is required from the Director of the Dwision of Building and Planning/designee of
a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
buiiding permit
4 Direct light from any exterior area tighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
5 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The
Title Notice should be recorded wrthin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and
shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows
The parcei of property legally described as "The east 135 feet of Lot 3, Block 3, first
addition to Weldon's subdivision" is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane
County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on November 18, 1998, imposing a
variety of speciai development conditions File No ZE-10-98 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
6 The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning shall file with the Spokane County
Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeai from the final disposition,
including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows
"Prior to the issuance of any buildmg permit for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsibie for complying with the provisions of
the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overiay
ZE-10 98 November 18, 1998 Publrc Heanng
Division of Buildmg and Plammng Recommended Conditions of Approval
Zone) The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as
follows "
ZE 10 98 November 18 1998 Public Heanng
Division of Building and Planrnng Recommended Conditions of Approval
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
S Jk;ANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTk..:T
ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL I'H DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
DATE October 26, 1998
✓
TO Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, Spokane C ty Buildi.ng and Plaruung Division
~
FROM Donald T Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
r fIECEIV ED
SUBJECT Proposed Zone Change ZE-10-98 (Catlow) SPOKANE CODUTY
r { ~ ~ 1 References
DIVISION OF 8UlLDING ANO PLANNfNG
a) Map of subject by applicant, undated, received by thus office OctOKer 21, 1998
b) Reconnaissance Geo1021c Man of the West Half of the Spokane QuadranQle Washinaton and Idaho.
Allan B Gnggs, 1966
c) Soil Survev Suokane Countv WashinQton, Soil Conservation Service, U S D A, March, 1968
d) Spokane Countv `Vashington EnQineenniz Interoretations, Soil Conservation Service, U S D A,
August, 1974
e) Snokane Countv Rules and Reeulations for Sewaee Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995
fl Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sections 16, 20, 21, 22, and 28
g) Map Greenacres Quadrangle, U S G S, 1973, and Spokane N E, U S G S, 1973
2 Findings
a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer
b) The project Is withln Cntical Water Supply Service Area and vvithin the service area of Modern
Electnc Water Company Water supply will be a pubhc system
c) The project is mside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Manajement Area, inside the
General Setiver Service Area, and mside the Pnonty Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80 0418 adopted March 24, 1930 The topo-gaphy and soils in
the area are generally surtable for use of individual on-srte sewaoe disposal systems The lot is not of
the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area west of Pmes Road and south of 3`d Avenue Local
draina2eways are insi~ruficant
e) Surface soils are classed by the U S Soil Conservation Service as Gamson gravelly loam with 0% to
5% slopes They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight There is also possible
cantamination af grounawater Thxs soil would be classifed as a I'ype IV
f) Geologica11y, the solIs are glaciofluvial deposits These geological structures generally yield rnaderate
to very large amaunts of water Data fTDm wellS iTl the ar~a referenced iri SeC#ion If show5 they are
from ${J' -to 250' deep and ~ave static water levels vary1ng from 50' to 165' below the surface The
IV1odern Electnc Power Company has 1ndicated that it can supply damest,c use water for the project
upon completton of agreements with the propanent
3 ~equired (mandatary) Conditions If Agproved
a) Sewage dlspasal rriethod shall be as authorized by the 1~lrector t~f Uti1ities, ~pakane Caunt~
b) Water service shall be coordtna~ed through the Director of Ut111ties, Spokane County
c) Water service shall be by an existing pu61ic water suppYy when apgroved by the Re~ional En+ineer
(Spokane), State Depar-tment of Health
d) A public sewer system w111 be made available for the project and individual service will be provided
Use of an Lndtvldual on-sitesewage dasposal systern shall not be authorized
4 Recommended Conditions of Approval
a) US~ ~f pIlvate we1lS a'1d WateI' 5ysteIt1s 1S prDhIbited
c Directar of Utilities, Spokane County
c Sponsor John Konen
Davrd Evans & A.ssvciates
1 10 W Catalda
Spokan~ WA 99201
landuse 1vl= 10 99
" ~,~^'r►~'
• ` i ` ^ ~
K
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
,
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 1
"ENGINEER' S C'ONDITIONS OF IYPPR,QVAL"/ ZQNE ;
- ,
TO Spokane County Planning Departmen - FROM Divlsion of Engineering & Roads
DATE October 29, 1998 ,
PROJECT UR-22 TO B-3 CATLOW MOVING
FILE # ZE-0010-98
Hearing 11/18/1998
Sponsor/Applicant JOHN KONEN (CATLOW)
Sectlon Township Range 21-25-44
P 1 anne r TP►NIMY JONE S
Technical Review Date (09J10/1998 C 2 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application" The following "Conditions of Approval" are submltted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for lnclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Spokzne County Engineering has no comments+concerning this application Required Engineering improvements were accomplished as per engineering
permit file #B98048 The applicant is advised to consult with the
Washington State Department of Transportation concerning Gny required
access permits or improvements to Pines Road
r
CC Aoplicant JOHN 2COVEN (CATLOW)
• Engineer/Surveyor
, Planner TAMMY :.ONES
To TAMMY JONES (Building & Planning)
CC
From JIM RED (Utilities)
Date 9l16/98
Subject ZE-0010-98 Stage Technical Review Phase
UR-22 TO B-3
ss09 A wet (five) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer
connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated
water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees
ss12a Applicant shatl submit expressly to Spokane County Qivision of Utitities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer p{ans and specifications for the pubiic sewer connections
and facilities for review and approvai Commercial developments shalf submit historical and or
estimated water usage as part of the sewer pian submittal
ss12f Sewer plans acceptable to the Drvision of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer construction permit
ss15a Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer
connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general faciilties
charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
ws01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County as amended
I ~ r f
1
'tiJ V n~..~3~~~~~~~ . ~ -,'a. , , , • s _ _ a .
Fram Hernmings IIil!
Sent Nfonday August 31 1998 9 05 AAJ1
Ta Jones Tammy
Cc Engelhard, Scatt, Pederson Johrr HaFpet, Pat, Kimball, Sandy, Busko Daug, Mil1er,
Katherine
Subject ZE-10-98 - Cra:g Cat1ow
8-31-98
I received the above referenced applir.ation vn August 28, 1998
This project lres in an area of approved so+fs so aconcept drainage plan is not required
1 have no kr~owledge af any critical areas on this sde
I cnnsider th3s appiNCa#ion tv be technically comple#e
OW
~
i
~~~TING
SP~~~ ~OUNTY DMSXON OF ~UELDING AND PT1ANNING
IDate / 59,? _
~ _
D Ep artment ~7741o Tf- O&%
Dep2rtment Contact Person _69_e'!5. IC-166ir
Actian ZE-1 0-98, Zone Reclassification fram Urban Residentaal-22 (UR-?~) to
Reglonal $usiness (B-3)
~~CHNICAL RE1JIE1N MEET1NG SEPTEMBER 10, 1998, @ 2 15 P M
v t e
The falIowutg information 1s to provide the proposal sponsor with pnrsary agency
corruments to asslst the spozzsor and a~d the processing ofpublic hearmg items heard
before the Heanng Exarnmer 7'he foIlnwsng uaforina-hon does not provzde acomplete vr
bind~~g final review of tae propasal 7lus will occur anly afler tae propasal is accepted
arid placed +on the Fublic Hearing Agenda The accent.ance of the a-DID11catlon and
Lchedullnz of the aDalicatian on the Publac Hearng A~ea~da is the pr~na~ fiuiction of
th2s meeting X secondary function of this rnee#mg is to gTavide a~rel~z~inaxv re~ew of
th-e anDIicalhon This wi11 pravrde aforu.~'n #'or the sponsor arrd other departnents of what
to exPect as standard development conchfions and design recommenda-bor}s
7'he comments received are 6ased on aprela_z=ary rev~ew ofthe applica#ion fazm and
slte plarl by the Departrnen#s and Agencies w}ich have bten circulated the iriformatlon
(not all agenciesldegartments have been con#acted--only those who have beerz deternmned
to have primary interest
~ a Does the appltcatlon(ar can the development) rneet requirernents to be
placed on #he Public Heanng Agenda? im YES ND
b Zf no, what rs Iacking?
c Public Heartne, Schedule Heanngs before the Hearing Exartmer are
scbeduled upon determinattvn that the application is coinplete items wIll be
seheduIed for the frst available pubIic hearm~
2 A-fter a lDreliminarv xeuiew ofthe apolicatyan what'°Candztions o#'Approva?
would be -requjred of the development? (Attach canditian~ if necessary)
cT_ Ac
_ ~ I~~~°}r. rsv 4 ~ ~ 3 2- # - r5 ~-LM r~.~
~ ~i rVA6 Z t~- Ot.ti f JA6Z An -At
IVrr S-C~ l 1 ~ A 4,1 rg.,50
7j- bj M~J S } ~~t~~•~ r~~
1
u;
i~
f
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
E F N AL"f
~
TO Spokane Caunty Planning Departme~
FROM azvision oi Engineering & Roads ue4
DATE October 29, 1998
PRpJECT UR-22 'I`O B- 3 CATL(.W MQVING
FILE ZEY0010-98
Hearing 11/18/1998
Sponsor f App1lcarrt J4]HN KONEN (CATLOW)
Sect ion Township Range 21 -2 5-44
P 1 ariner TAMNFY LJONES
Techn1cal Review Date (09/10/1998 @ 2 15)
The Spakane County Engin~eringf Department has reviewed the abave referenced
application The fallowing "Canda-tions of Approval " axe submitted to the
Sgakane County P1anning Departrnent for inclusian in the "Findings af Factr
Conclusions and Drder fDecasion" should the request be agproved
4 }
Spokane County Engineering has no camrnents concerning,rth-is applicat`son ~
Required Engineering zxnprovements were accomplished as, per engineering
perrrit file #B98048. The applicant is advised to cvnsult with the
Washirgton State Department af Transportation conce-rninc~ any requzred
access permits or irnprovements ta Pines Raad
s,
h
w
ti
x
~ i
!
1
~ I
~ y
S k
1
Y
CC App 1ic ant JOHN KObTEN { CATLt}GT )
• EngineerJSurveyor
Planner T€sMMY JONES
RECEIVED
DETERMINATION OF NOY 02 1998
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL OR.DINANCE 8FOPNECOUNTY ENG!NFER
FILE NUNiBER: ZE-10-98
DFSCRIP'TION OF PROPOSAL: Zone reclassification of approximately 14,034 square feet from
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in the B-3 zone.
APPLICANTIOWNER: Craig Catlow
PROPONENT'S AGENT: John Konen, David Evans & Associates
110 W. Cataldo
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 327-8697
LOCATION OF PROPUSAL: 302 S. Pines Rd. Generally located west of and adjacent to Pines Rd.
and approximately 100 feet south of Sprague Avenue in the N%z of Section 21, Township 25N, Range
44EWM, Spokane County, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
DETERN1INATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it dces not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be sabmitted no luter
than 4:00 p.m., November 17, 1998, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be
sent to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tammy Jones e: Associate Planner - - Spokane County Division of Building & Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675
DATE ISSUED: November 2, 1998 SIGNATURE:
iJ U
CONtiViF]vis REGARDiNC3 QWIRONMENTAL CONCFRNS ARE WELCOIVlE AT TIHE HFARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATIOIY, after it becomes final, may b~made to t e SPOKANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calPndar days after the signing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant shoutd be prepared to make
specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the
specifics for a SEPA nppeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
l. WA State Department of Ecology (Otympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transportation Engineering; Pat Harper
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; Bill Flemmings
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwaier Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Spokane Counry Division of Long Range Planning; John Mercer
Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski
9. WA State Dept. of Transportation; Mark Rowher
10. Fire Protection District No. 1
1 I. Ntodern Electric Water Company
►
RECEIVED
;1' 0 CT 2119~8
S P O K A N E O U
OrLWYMV6
BUILUING AND PLANN'T\iG • A DfVIS10iV OF THE PLBI-IC Wof:Ks DF.''AR_T-N1Fti'I
JA.\iLS L. MANSON. C.B.O., DfFEC7OR DFtiNtS'v1. Sc:c~rr, P.F., DiRFC-fOft
MEMORANDUM
'rO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper, c!o Sandy Kimball
Development Engineering Serviccs; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; !im Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning; John Mercer
Fire Protection District No. 1
WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
Modern Electric Water Company
FRONi: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE: October 21, 1998
~
i
SUQJEC'"T': Review and comments for ihe hearinR of Novernikr 18, 1998 at 9-00 a.Ri.
FI LE # ZE-10-98
Description: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
to Regional Business (B-3)
(STR) 21-25-44
Sponsor: Craig Catlow, c/o John 1<onen, David Evans & Associates
Note that the application, maps and Environmental checklist were previously circulated to your
aeency. - - -
Please review and return any commeqts to me by November 4, 1998.
hrd I
Attarhments: Nutice of Public Hearing
~
1()?h <<'f tif Bi:1.1.1UlW AVI:NI'E • ~f'()F:AVE=, WA5H1N:k:Tc
PfioNr (504) 4_%-3b75 • FAX: (~~~)4jb-4703
I [)D: (5119) 324-3166
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet ~
YOti ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE fIELD UN THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No. ZE-10-98, Zone reclassitication of approximately 14,034 square feet froin tJrban
Residential-22 (i1R-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for chose uses allowed in the (B-3) zone.
Hearing Date and Time: November 18, 1998 9:00 a.m.
Place: Gommissioners' Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane Courity Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Owner/Applicant: Craig Catlow
Agent: John Konen, David Evans & Associates, 110 W. Cataldo, Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 327-8697
Address and Location: 302 S. Pines Road. Generally located west of and adjacent to Pines Road and
approximately 100 feet south of Sprague Avenue in the N'/~ of S 21, T 25N, R 44EVVM, Spokane
County, WA.
Comprchensivc Plan: Major Commerical and Urban
Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
Environmental Determination: Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
Related Permits: None
Division of Building & PlAnning Staff: Tammy Jones, (509) 4.77-3675
HEARING EXANiINFR PROCEDURES
Hearing Proeess and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interesied persons may testify at the public hearinQ, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearine. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to
persons ~Nlth physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspec;tion
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning, 1' Floor Permit Center West, Public Works I3uilding, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays.
Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have anv questions or
special nzeds, please call the Division at (509) 477-3675. Send written comments to theySpokane County
Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: Tammy Jones, ZE-
10-98. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`a
Floo~r. Public «'orks F3uilding, 1026 W. Broadway, Spc~kane, WA, 99?60-024~.
i ~
OFFICE OF THE SP(JKANE ~OUNTY ENGTNEER
1026 W Braadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (549)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
c`ENGITVEER'S CONDITIO1tiI~ OF APPRUVAL" TR-ZC1NES
TO Spokane Caunty Building and Planrung Depa.rl.ment
FROIVI Divlslon afEngYrzeering & Roads
DATE September 18, 1998
PROJEC'Y" UR-22 TU B-3 CATLOW IVIOVING
FILE # ZE-0010-98
Heanng Date ~}a #
Review Date
SponsarlApplxcant TANIlVIY ]ONE5
Section Townshlp Rarige 21{25-44
Plariner TA304Y JQNES
TechrrrcaURevYew Date (09l1 0ll 998 @ 2 15)
The Sp~kane Caunty Engineenng Deparkrnent has reviewed the above refereneed apphcation The following
"Conditions ofA.pprvval" are srabrrutted to the Spokane County Plwuvmg Depa-etrnent for a.notusion in the
"F1ndings of Fact, Concluslo~~ ~d OrderfDecision" should the request be approved
Spokane Caunty Engineering has no comments concerning this application
Required Engineering impravemerrts were accomplished as per engineering
permit file #B98048 The applicant -is advised to consult with the
Washington State Departrnent of Transportatiori concerning any requireci
access permits or imprauements to Pines Road
(cATLOw}
~ cc Applicant JOxrr KarrEg
~ Eng lneer J 5urveyar
Planner TAt9MY JONES
1
1
ti
, • ' ~
. ~
• ~
' RECEVED
~ t
AU6 ~ 1 1998
o u E4
S P O K A N E 1~
c
BUlLUlNG ANU PLANN[NG • A U1V1tilU.V Qf: IHE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAM~-s L. MAN50\}, C.B.O., DtREc'roR DENwts M. ScoTr, P.E., D[ttECroR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roacs; Pat Harper c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Hofderb;r
Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
Central Valley School District No. 356
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
Modern Electric V1later Co.
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
.
DATE: August 28, 1998 _
RE: ZE-10-98; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-22 to Regicnaf
Business (B-3) _
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
SEPTEMBER 10. 1998 @ 2:15 .m.
DIVISION OF BUILDIN~ A'VD PLANNING 1'` FLOO~ CONFERENCE ROOM
Please review the above appl`ca_ion and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to
attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend
this meeting. If you cannot attend the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of yoLir
review comments on the attached form to me prior to the meeting. The attached
TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS wi(I be given to the sponsor af the meeting and included in
the Division of Building and Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your
cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 456-
3675.
NOTE: The Division of Building 8 Planning wiil now be circulatiny comments for
SEPA Checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only time
you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Check(ist for this
project.
c: Craig Catlotiv, 1025 S. Ridgemorit Dr., Veradale, V.fA. G9037
David Evans & Associates c/o John Konen, 110 W. Cataldo, Spckar,e, lN'h. 9-,20 i
AiL3chrnenfs' Te,-hn;c~-1 Farm, Ap^lica;ion, Site P'an, SEP~';
r
1~I.~f)11Y:1~ Avl:,"L.: • l:ii..:,~.~, `,i1ti~1~~`.li.~~~~i~)
Pi :o~,:L (509)4-%-3675 • FAX (`11') ~ 4
([lr)• ~ .~1~c~1 i?-1 ';1 r,r,
~
r
Spokane County
Division of Building & Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time September 10, 1998 @ 2 15 p m
Project File No ZE-10-98
Project Location Generally located west of and adjacent to Pines Road
and approximately 100 feet south of Sprague Avenue in the N'/2 of
Section 21, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington
Comprehensive Plan Commercial
Project Descr~ption Zone reclassification from Urban Residentia!-22 (UR-
22) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in the Regional
Business (B-3) zone
Parcel No(s) 45211 2603
Applicant(s) Craig Catlow, 1625 S Ridgemont Dnve, Veradale, WA
99037 (509) 922-2229
Project Planner Tammy Jones
~
~
~
~
\
~
~
Kimball, Sandy ~
From Hemmings, Bill
Sent Monday, August 31, 1998 9 05 AM
To Jones Tammy
Cc Engelhard Scott, Pederson John Harper, Pat Kimball Sandy, Busko, Doug, Miller, Katherine
Subject ZE-10-98 - Craig Catlow
8-31-98
I received the above referenced application on August 28 1998
This project lies in an area of approved soils so a concept drainage plan is not required
I have no knowledge of any critical areas on this site
I consider this application to be technically complete
Ew q
Page 1
~
Y
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PARTI
A GENERAL INFORMATION
LegalOwner Craig Catlow ,
Mailing Address 1625 S Ridgemont Drive
City Veradale State wA Zip Code 99037
Phone 9 2 Z- 2 2 2 9 (Work) 9 2 2- 2 2 2 9 (Home) Fax
ApplticanVAgent J D Konen, Davx.d Evans and Associates, Inc
Mailing Address W 110 Cataldo ,
City Spok a n e State wA Zip Code 9 9 2 O 1
Phone 3 2 7- 8 6 9 7 (Work) (Home) Fax 3 2 7- 7 3 4 5
t
lF APPL{CANT IS NOT OWNER, 1NCLUDE WRiTTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLIC/1NT TO
SERVE AS REPRESCNTATIVE
Project/proposai site area (acres or sq ft ) 14 , 0 3 4 sq f t
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft ) None
Assessor's parcel numbers of projecUproposal 45211 2603
Assessor's parcel numbers oF adjacent area owned or controlled N/A
Street address of proposa! 302 S Pines Road
Existing zone cfassification(s) and date established U R- 2 2
Existing use of property 3,000 sq. ft office building
Proposed zoning B-3
~
Comprehensive plan category Commercial ISclioo) district Central Valley
Water purveyor Modern Fire district 1
Proposed use of property ~
Single family dwellings Duplexes Muftifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Buslness industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Other ( ) - Descrfbe
List previous planning division actions involving this property
B LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIF{CATION INFORMATION
Location of proposal 302 South Pines Road
Section 21 Township 25N Range 4 4 EWM
Name of public road(s) providing access Pines Road, a State Highway
Width of praperty fronting on public road 110 5 feet
r
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION,.PPLICATION PAGE 2 Of 4
t
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes (X) No
Name(s) of arterial roads Pines Road
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposed
The east 135 ft of Lot 3, Block 3, first addition to
Weldon's subdivision, according to plat recorded in
Volume 8 of Plats, Page 41, in Spokane County, Washington
EXCEPT that portion of Lot 3, 61ock 3 conveyed to the
State of'Washington by deed recorded under Recording No
8504160078
Existing zone(s) UR-22 to proposed zone(s) B-3
for the following described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below
See above
If you do not hold title to the property what is your interest in it? Owner.
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposai warranted?
1) Change in comprehensive plan provides for commercial
uses alonq Pines Road 2) More commercial uses have
been established alonq Pines Road frontages 3) Traffic
increase along Pines Road is not conducive to residential uses
What impact wili the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
None Applicant seeks to allow commerical uses to
occupy existing office building
Wliat factors support the zone reclassification? The property to the north is
a commercial glass retail facility, propefty to south is
retail center, property to the west is apartment complex,
and the property to the east is a landscape business
The B-3 zone allows additional flexibility in tenant mix.
Tne site is aesignatea --commerica.i on 5poxane c:ounty -s comprehensivE
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use? plan
tvone The existing office building conforms to commercial
(B-3) setbacks, buffering, and parksng requirements
A
r
~
.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATiOii APPLICATION PAGE 3 of 4
PART II
This section of the application will provtde the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified
Results of the preliminary consultation shail be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal
to the Division
,/FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT -~I A This proposai is within Fire Protection District No
B Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes
C Recommended fire flow Uh K- , or unabie to calculate now because use is not
definitive and will be determined at time of building permit application
D Requirements include M'ID
!5
,f ok,. , Ur41lc F Y,
Fire District Mdnature/Title ~ Oate
/WATER PURVEYOR ~J}'~~~,1Uu A YA&tL6
i~~ ~
A Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fird flow requirements (have) (boiRpmet)
been made ,
B Requirements/comments `Vt.o-
~
/6~f/~~x~ ~ ~,C~► I l_+~y
Water District i nature/Title Date
, . ,
/COUNTY E N G i N E E R ~/,~,LQJ -0' 60AA~ji(~.(~Q~ ~ Cl
A preliminary discussion has taken piace and general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed with the applicant
A Comments
v Signature/Title Dat
/
COUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for sLibmittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied The designated water purveyor for this site is
_r'-P a,~rl-i
A Comments c c,prj,tp. -L wnl~C r J , t
~
~A/900
Signature/Title ~ Date
/
V REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
~ .
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied
~
A Comments 5~pvt~ *,4^/ P"41,c
/
twjfia-fure/Title D te ~
-
~ SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant
A Comments C rar~
~ ~ ~ ~1-7 n ~ `3 /~°v
Sign ture/Title r Date
~ .
~
s
' Z_ONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 4 of 4
~ ' ....v ~~ti..~ . . .
t~A fo~
3 ~
PART II I ~
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION % ~ ~ rSf~~.'"~ O ~
/
I the undersigned, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the information requeste) C).~
zoning map and wntten legal description
- ~ ; ~i"I L LJ\V~t~ ~
S i g n e d L-V~ L-l3l 4,- Date 4a12 i'~ S EXPIRES 1141
Address Phone S9zl4 3Z.7, Se97
City 5; rd K F~j J'~LE. State wA Zip q a12.b 1
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perJury that tne above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identified land use action or if not the owner, attached Iierewith is wntten permission from the
owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf
Signed Date Zi/~
Address a~,Z:>r Phone n-c2',5~~ 2. 2- z- 7- Z
City 99l~State _Z,~.~ Zip 9.S'03 7
Signatur f applicant or representative Date
Sta e of Washington )
) ss
County of Spokane
~
-f-
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on thcs ~ day of 19 SAB
by r-a.~. +-Ln.~1 _
Notary Seal ~ o'
OFFtCI11L SEAL )tar Public in and for the State of Wasliington residing
~
tau~i~ cA~veR ' r#x~
NOTARY PURLIC _ STATE Of WnsNINGTON at
v ~
COUVTY OF SR My appantment exp~s \ C Ck
O«/`,NE MY Cof*'mt slon Fxn ma AA-.. t ,n^^
i
PART V
TO 8E COMPLETEO BY TiAE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
Date submitted _Zft4 Z7 File number "to
Date accepted By &4MLW
Total fees# . Receipt number
~
NliEt 11E2UtIE APf t K.19 4 07
SP_OKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART (
A GENERAL INFORMATION
LegalOwner Craig Catlow
Mailing Address 1625 S Ridgemont Drive
City Veradale State WA Zip Code 99037
Plione 9 2 2- 2 2 2 9 (Work) 9 2 2- 2 2 2 9 (Home) Fax
ApplicanUAgent J D Konen, David Evans and Associates, Inc
Mailing Address W 110 Ca t a ldo
City Spokane State wA Zip Code 99201
Phone 3 2 7- 8 6 9 7 (Work) (Home) Fax 3 2 7- 7 3 4 5
1
IF APPLICAN7 IS NOT OWNER (NCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT 70
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
Project/proposa{ site area (acres or sq ft ) 14 , 0 3 4 sq f t
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft ) None
Assessor's parcel numbers of projecVproposal 45211 2603
Assessor s parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled N/A
Street address o( proposal 302 S Pines Road
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR-22
Exisling use of praperty 3,000 sq f t of f ice building
Proposed zoning B - 3
Comprehensive plan category Commercial Scfiool districk Central Valley
Water purveyor Modern Fire district 1
Proposed use of property
~
Single family dweliings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business Industriai ( } Mixed use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe
List previous planning division actions involving this property
B LEGALIZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
Location ofproposal 302 South Pines Road
Section 21 Township 25N Range 4 4 EWM
Name of pub{ic road(s) providing access Pines Road, a State Highway
Width of property fronting on public road 110 5 f e e t
r
~
ZONE RECIASSIFICATION APPL1CATlON PAGE 2 of 4
. ~
Does the proposal have access to an arterial ar planned arterial? Yes (X) No
Name(s) of arterial roads Plnes Road
Legal descnption of property for each zone rPClassification proposed
The east 135 ft of Lot 3, Block 3, first addition to
Weldon's subdivision, according to plat recorded in
Volume 8 of Plats, Page 41, in Spokane County, Washington
EXCEPT that portion of Lot 3, 81ock 3 conveyed to the
State of Washington by deed recorded under Recording No
8504160078
Existing zone(s) UR-22 to proposed zone(s) B-3
for the following described properky
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below
~ See above
If you do not hold title to the property what is your interest in it? Owner
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
1) Change in comprehensive plan provides for commercial
uses alonq Pines Road 2) More commercial uses have
been established along Pines Road frontages 3) Traffic
a.ncrease along Pines Road is not conducive to residential uses
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
None Applicant seeks to allow commerical uses to
occupy existing office building
What factors support the zone reclassification? The property to the north ls
a commercial glass retail facility, propetty to south is
retail center, property to the west is apartment complex,
and the property to the east is a landscape business.
The B-3 zone allows additional flexs.bility in tenant mix
The site is aesignatea "commerical" on Spoxane c.ounty's comprehensive
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposai s impact on surrounding land use? plan
None The existinq office building conforms to commercial
(B-3) setbacks, buffering, and parksng requirements
A
~
.w
ZONE RECLASSlFICATION APPLfCATRON PAGE 3 of 4
. ~
PqRY I i
This sectron af the appficakion wili provide the Dlvrsron of BuiCdtng and Planning staff witn writlen
ve(ifrcativn #hat the appJicant has had preliminery consultataon with the agencoes identifaed
Results of fhe preRiminary consuikatian 5ha11 be incorporated Rn the proposal before final s~bmittal
to the Di+visian
k 'F1RE MaRs~~LL/FiRE DrsTRIcT~l A This pr-oposal is vwithin FNre Protection District Ala
8 Adequate arrangernenks (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providwg for an
adeq4iate water system and facilities for fre protection purposes
C Recommended fire flaw or unable to calcuta#e now because use is not
definitive and will be determined a# time of buiiding permit application
a Requirernents include
Fire District Sagnaturef7itle Date
~ 1NA7ER PURVEYpR ~f"''A
A Satisfactrry areangemen#s for domestic water and fire flow requirements (have) (have not)
been made
E3 Requirerr7errtslcomments
Waler District Signature/TitEe Date
/COUNTY ENGrNEER nt&
~ I
A prelimir,aryr discussion has taken place and general requrrements faf roads and drarnage have
been discussed witf7 khe applfcant ~
A Cor'nments ,
- ~ , ~
~
Sign8tUrelTitfe aal ~
~
f
CDUN7Y UTILi~`IES
A prelirrtinary discussian has taken place and general requirements far suhmittal ofthis proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfierJ The designated water ~urveyor for thts sike is
A Camments a -L4 w(l.~
L 7-.~
5ignakL,relTitle Date
J
~ REGIOhIAL HEAL,TH DIS7RICT
ApreEjminary discLassian has taken place and general requirements far suhmiftaf of this proposaf
(have) (have nat) been satrsfisd
A Commenfs
SignaturelTitle Date
~
~/'SEVwlER PURVEYOR
A prelimrnary discussion has taken place and general requFrements for the provision of pubric
sewer are understood by the applicant
A CoRlC1"}ef1t5 c- uP e C A-e-
`3
Sign kurelTitle Date
~ w
.A
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 4 of 4
~
PART I I I
SIJRVEYOR VERIFICATION
I the undersigned a licensed land surveyor have completed the information requested for the
zoning map and written legal description
Signed Date
Address Phone
City State Zip
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I the undersigned swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identified land use action or, if not the owner, attached herewith is written permission from the
owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf
Signed Date
Address Phone
City State Zip
Signature of applicant or representative Date
State of Washington )
) ss
County of Spokane )
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on this day of , 19 ,
by
Notary Seal
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing
at
My appointment expires
PART V
TO 8E COMPLETED BY 7HE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
Date submitted File number
Date accepted By
Total fees Receipt number
Vi EL IIt2UriE APi 4 KJ! 4 07
~
Now
RECEIPT SUMMARY
w
TRANSACTION NUMBER T9801336 DATE 08/18/98
APPLICANT CRAIG CATLOW PHONE=
ADDRESS 1625 S RIDGEMONT DR
VERADALE WA 99037
CONTACT NAME CRAIG CATLOW PHONE= 509 922 2229
TRANSACTION ZONING PERMIT (ENGINEERGS & UTILITIES)
DOCUMENT ID 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS PARCEL NO 45211 2603
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200 00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 100 00
TOTAL DUE = 300 00
TOTAL PAID= 300 00
BALANCE OWING= 00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
08/18/98 00009348 10206 300 00
PROCESSED BY WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU
~
.
Pl?,RMI7 CENTrR EAS I' PASSPORT ff
llatc ~G~-- Numbcr
` A~ y!
N-ime Phonc
AdCIt ESS
COl11CriC[1l5
CiJSTOMER ROUTING
y Sr a il- ~o -7~
~ Di% ision of t3utldine & Plannine Division of Engmeering ~
Addre.ssing Pernzit Review Approach Permit
~ Building Permrt Shorelines Info Flood F'lain Permit
~ Code Iniormation Short Plat Info Public/Pnvatc Roads
~ Cominercial Revie« Subdivision Info Res Bldg Permit Rev
~ Confcrence Temp Use Permit Site Drainage Info
~ f irc Safety Review Vanance Appl Subdrvision EZevacw
a Manufacwred Home Zone Check Uttlity Pesmit
Mechanical Pemlits j ~ Zone Info Change Review
~
~ Plumbing PeRnits
a Pnvate Road Info NO FEE REQUIRED
Re er I ~ Time Out
Residcntial Revie%% "~-(i )
"J
~ Sewer Permits Division of Utslihes ~
~ (nformatron Subdtivision Review
~ Admin Exception ULID/Sewer Info
~ 1~0
[3inding Site Plan into Zone Change Review
~
~ Cei t Of Excmption
~ Comprehensive Plan NO FEE REQUlRED
Reviewer Timc Out
~ Cond Use Penr►it
F~ Critical Arcas Info # I ~ Health Dtstrtct ~
~ Nonconfomimg Usc.
p FEE REQU/RED NO FEC REQUlRf_D
ReviLwu 1 uilL ll.. I ime Otit ltevicwcr 1 uiie Out
, ~ I
(
\
~M
IN t
.,--•i" ~
t
r~► ~ r .
~
r.~,.,..~.i
ORDINANCE
MEN
IRO IsiTAL
-1~E ENV-
TION ~.SPC~~~ 10.23Q, -
SE~11.
~
~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197 11 960) Section 11 10 230(1)
Em,r«,mentai cr,ecatsc
Purpose of Checklist File No
Th0 State Environmental Pobcy Act (SEPA) Chapter 43 21 C RCW reqwres all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a
proposal before makmg decisions An Environmentai Impact StatemeM (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals sigrnficant adverse impacts on the
qualrty of the environment The purpose of this checkiist is to provide mformation to help you and the agency identrfy impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if tt can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
Instructions for Applicants
This environmental checklist asks you to descntie some basic informatton about your proposal Govemmental agencies use this checkhst to determine
whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are signrficant requinng preparation of an EIS Answer the questions bnefly vwth the most precise
information known or give the best descnption you can
You must answer each questton accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge In most cases you should ba able to answer the questions from
your own observaUons or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do rsot {maw the answer or if a question does not apply to your
proposal wnte do not know/' or does not apply Complete answers to the quesiions now may avoid unnecessary delays later
Some questions ask about govemmental regulations such as zornng shoreline and landmarlc designations Answer these questions if you can If you
have problems the governmental agenaes can assist you
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even d you plan to do them over a penod of time or on difference parcels of land Attach any
additional information that wnll descnbe your proposal or ds envrronmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain
your answers or provide addiUonal information reasonabiy related to determining if there may be sigrnficant adverse impact
Use of checklist for non project proposals
Complete this checklist for non project proposals even though questions may be answered does not appty IN ADDITION complete the
SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D)
For non project actions the references in the checktist to the words project applicant and property or site should be read as proposal proposer
- and affected geographic area respectively
A BACKGROUND
1 Name of proposed project if applicable Zone change - UR-22 to B-3
2 Name of Applicant Craig Catlow
3 Address and phone number of applicant or contact person 1625 S Ridgemont Drive, Veradale, WA 99037
509-922-2229
4 Date Checktist Prepared Rugust 19, 1998 5 Agency requesting checklist Spokane County Dept of Building and Planning
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing rf applicable) Immedlate
7 a Do you have any plans for future additions expansion or further actrvity related to or connecfed to this proposal? If yes explain No
b Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes explain No
8 List any environmental mformation you know about that has been prepared or vinll be prepared directly refated to this proposal
None
Rev 2/1/88 1
~
A BACKGROUND (continued)
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmerrtal approvals of other proposals directly aflecting the property cavered by your
proposal If yes explam None are known
10 List any govemment approvals or permits that wnll be needed for your proposal d known Remodel and sign pernuts f or
new tenants
11 Give a bnef descnption of your proposal including the proposed uses and the s¢e of the project and srte (There are several questions later m this
checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your praposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page )
The existing 3,000 sq ft office building which is zoned UR-22 is proposed for B-3
zoning This will allow a wider range of commercial tenants to occupy the building in
the future
12 Location of the proposal Give significant information for a person to understand the precise IocaUon of your proposed proJect includmg a street
address tf any and section township and range d known If a proposal would occur over a range of area provide the range or boundanes of the
site(s) Provide a legal descnption sde plan wcirnty map and topographic map d reasonabty available Whde you should submd any plans
reqwred by the agency you are nCk required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted vinth any permd application
related to this checklist The site is located on 14,034 sq ft of land at 302 South Pines Road
(Assessor's Parcel #45211 2603) The tract is situated in Section 21, TWP 25Id, Range
94EWM A complete leqal description accompanies the application
13 Does the proposed action he wnthin the Aquder Sensrtrye Area (ASA)? The General Sewsr Service Area? The Pnonty Sewer Service Area
(ASA)? The City of Spokane? (see Spokane County/s ASA Overtay Zone Atlas for boundanes)
The property is within the ASA, the GSSA, the PSSA, but outside the City of Spokane
.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for
agency Use Only
1 EARTH
a General descnption of the site (circle one) flat rolhng hilly steep slopes mountamous
other Flat
b What is the steepest slope on the s►te (approximate percent slope)?
Less than 1%
c What general types of soils are found on !he sde ( e clay sand gravel peat muck)? If you
know the classification of agncultural soils specrfy and note any pnme farmland
Garrison gravelly loam (GgA), a glacial outwash soil
typical of the Spokane Valley
d Are there surface indicatiorts or history of unstable sods in the immediate vicmity? If so
descnbe No
Rev 2/1188 2
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
e Descnbe the purpose type and approximate quantrties of any filling or grading proposed
Indicate source of fill None Slte ls constructed
f Coutd erosion xcur as a resuit of cleanng construction or use? If so generally descnbe
No Site is constructed
g About what percent of the sde wnll be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example asphaft or bwidings) 60$ of the site 1s
covered by the building and associated parking lot
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth d any
None Site is constructed
2 AIR
a What type of emissions to the air would resuk from the proposai (such as dust automobde
odors industrtal wood smoke) dunng construction and when the project is completed? If any
generally describe and give approwmate quantittes if knawn Conversion to
commercial uses could slzghtly increase traffic usage
b Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may afiect your proposal? if so
generally descnbe The pro3ect adjoins Pines Road, a State
Highway
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impads to the air if any
None The parking lot is paved and the site landscaped
3 WATER
a Surface
(1) Is there any surface water body on or m the immediate vicmrty of the srte includmg year round
and seasonal streams saltvwater lakes ponds wetlands? Ii yes describe type and
provide names If appropnate state what stream or nver rt flows into No The
site is 2 miles southwest of the Spokane River
(2) Wdl the project requtre any work over in or adjacent to (withm 200 feet) the descnbed
waters? If yes descnbe and attach availabie plans No
Rev 2/1/88 3
c
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge matenal that would be placed in or removed irom the
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the sde that would be aRecied
Indicate the source of fill matenal None
(4) Wdl the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Grve a general
descnptron purpose and approximate quantrties d known
No The site is constructed
(5) Does the proposal lie wrthin a 100-year flood plam? if so note tocation on the sde plan
No
(6) Does the proposal invoNe an discharge of waste matenats to surface waters? If so
descnbe the type of waste and antiapated volume of dLscharge
The project is connected to the Spokane Valley sewer
system
B Ground
(1) Will groundwater be withdrawn or will water be disctrarged to groundwaterT Give general
descnption purpose and approximate quanUties d kROwn
The project is served by public water (Modern Water
District) Surface water runoff from the parking lot is
accommodated in an existing "208" swale with drywall
(2) Descnbe waste matenal that wnil be discharged into the ground from sepUc tanks or oiher
sanitary waste treatment facility Descnbe the general stze of the sysiem the number of houses
to be served or the number of persons the system(s) are expeded to serve
The 3,000 sq ft building connects to the Spokane Valley
Sewer System
(3) Descnbe any systems other than thcse desrgned for the disposal of sandary wraste instailed
tor the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground suriace (tncludes systems such as those
for the disposal of storm water or drairrage from floor dratns) Descnbe the type of system the
amount oi matenal to be disposed oithrough the system and the types of matenais likely to be
disposed of (ncludmg matenals whtch may enter the sysiem
inadvertentiy through spills or as a resuft af firefighting actavitles)
Site is served by on-site "208" swale system
(4) Wdl any chemicals (espectalty organsc soNenis or petroleum fuels) be stored m above-ground
or underground storage tanks? If so wtsat types/quantities of matenals wll be stored?
None are currently stored on site It is unlikely that
future commercial tenants will store chemicals or fuels
Rev 211/88 4
~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Oniy
(5) What protective measures wnll be taken to insure that leaks or spols of any chemicals stored or
used on site wnll not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this mciudes measures to keep
chemicals out of disposal systems descnbed in 3b(2) and 3b(3))?
None In the event that future commercial tenants store
chemicals or petroleum products, appropriate permits
would be required
c Water Runoff (mcluding stormwater)
(1) Descnbe the source of runoff (ncluding stormwater) and method of callection and disposal if
any (include quantities if knawn) Where wnll this water flov+~T Wdl this water flow into other
waters? Ifso descnbe The existing parking lot ls served by an
on site "208" swale system with drywall
(2) Will any chemicals be stored handled or used on the site in a location where a spol or leak
wll drain to surface or groundwater or to a siormwater disposal system discharging to
surface or groundwater? No See response 3b (5) above
(3) Could waste matenals enter ground or surface waters? If so generally descnbe
No See above
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface ground artd runoff water impacts d any ('d the
proposed aciion lies w►thin the Aquder Sensttij. Area be especially clear on explanations relating
to facihUes conceming Sections 3b(4) 3b(S) and 3c(2) of this checidist)
The site a.s served by existing "208" swale with drywall
4 PLANTS
a Circle type of vegetation fouRd on the site
X deciduous tree aider maple aspen other
evergreen tree fir cedar pine other
shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet sotl plants catiail buttercup bullrush skink cabbage other
water plants water lilly eelgrass milfod other
other types of vegetation
b What kind and amount of vegetation wnll be removed or altered None Site i s
developed
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the stte None per
Spokane County Data Atlas (1981)
d Proposed landscapmg use of natroe plants or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the srte if any None Site is currently landscaped
Rev 2/1l88 5
~ c
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Onty
5 ANIMALS
a Ctrcle any birds and arnmals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site
birds hawk heron eagle ongbir lher
mammals deer bear eik beaver other Small Mamm~s-"
fsh bass salmon trout hemng shellfish ot er
other
b Ust any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
None known per Spokane County Data Atlas (1981)
c Is the site part of a mrgration route? If so explain No S1te 1s wlthln
urbanized area
d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wnidlde if any None Site is
within urbanized area
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a What kmds of energy (electric natural gas wood stove solar) YAll be used to meet the completed
proJect s energy needs? Descnbe whether d will be used for heatmg
manufacturing etc Existing building is served by electricity
and natural gas
b Would your project affed the potential use ot solar energy by adjacent properties? If so
generally describe No
c What kinds of energy conservation features are inciuded in the plans of thrs proposal? List
other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts d any None
The site is constructed
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any envtronmerttai heahh hazards including exposure to towc chemicals nsk of fire and
explosion spiil or hazardous wasie that could occur as a resuft of this proposal? if so
describe No The site is constructed Some uses will
change from offices to commercial
(1) Descnbe special emergertcy sernces that might be reqwred None
Rev 2/1/88 6
!
~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental heatth hazards if any
None Site is constructed
b Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic
equipmentoperation othet? The site adjoins Pines Road, a busy
State Highway, and a strip commercial center
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated wrth the project on a short
term or a long term basis (for example traffic consttuction operation other) Indicate
what hours noise would come from the srte None The s 1 te 1 s
constructed
(3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts d any None
The site is constructed
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a What is the current use oi the srte and adJacent properties? The slte
accommodates a 3,000 sq ft office building
Surrounding uses - North is a glass shop, west is
apartment complex, south is commercial strip center, east
is a landscape business
b Has the srte been used for agnculture? If so descnbe Not in recent years
c Descnbe any structures on the sde The site accommodates a 3,000
sq ft office building
d WQI any structures be demolished? If so which? No
e What are the current zoning classificaUons of the site UR-22
f What is the cuRent comprehensive plan designat►on of the site Commerclal
g If applicable what is the cunent shoreline master program desrgnation of the srte
N/A
h Nas any part of the srte been classtriad as an environmentally sensrtrve area? If so specity
No
I Approximately how many people would reside or worfc in the completed project7
Approximately 5 to 10 people
Rev 2/1/88 7
t
[ ♦
l ~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (contmued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
) Approximately how many people would the camplete project dispiace? None
k Proposed measures to avotd or reduce displacement impacts d any None
I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible vwih ents#tng and projecied land
uses and plans d any The project is constructed in
conformance to applicable zoning and building codes
9 HOUSING
a Approximately how many unrts wooutd be provided d anYt Indicate whether high mtddle
or low income housing None This is a commercial project
b Approximately how many un►ts rf any would be el►minated? Indicate whether high middle-
or low income housing None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts d any None
10 AESTHETICS
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not inctudirtg aniennas? What Is the
pnncipal extenor building matenal(s) proposed? Exlsting one story
building not exceeding 20 feet in height
b What views in the immediate vicmrty would be altered or obstruded? None The
pro]ect is constructed
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesihetrc impacts if any None The
project is constructed
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of IighU giare v+nll the proposal produce? What Ume of day would d mainly occurT
The existing parking lot is lighted
b Could light or glare from the firnshed product be a safety hazard or interfere wrth views?
No
c What existing offsrte sources of Iight or glare may affect your proposal?
The site adjoins Pines Road, a busy thoroughfare with
businesses on both sides of the street
d Proposal measures to reduce or conirol light and glare imRacts d any
Lighting and signage will conform to code standards
Rev 2/1 /88 8
(
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
12 RECREATION
a What designated and mformal recreationai oppoRundies are in the immedtate vicirnty/T
None
b Would the proposed protect displace any exishng recreatlonal uses? If so descnbe
No The pro3ect is constructed
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation utcluding recreabonal
opportunrties to be provided by the project or applicant rt any None
13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects Iisted on or proposed foi nattonal state or local preservaUon
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so generafly descnbe None are
known
b Generalfy descnbe any landmarks or evidence of histonc archaeological scientfic or
cuitural importance known to be on or next to the site None are known
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts d any The slte 1s
constructed
14 TRANSPORTATION
a Identify pubUc streets and highways serving the srte and descnbe proposed access to the
existing street system Show onsrte plans if any ACCess is confined to
Pines Road, a State Highway
b Is stte currently served by public transit? If not what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop? Transit Service is available in Sprague
Avenue, 3 blocks north of the project
c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? Flow many would the project
eliminate? The pro3ect currently accommodates 12 off
street parking stalls
d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets or improvements to existing roads or streets
not including dnveways? If so generalty descnbe (indicate public or pnvate)
No The site is constructed
e Will the project use (or occur m the immediate wcmity oQ water rail or air transportahon? If
so generally describe No
Rev 2/1 /88 9
s
J
l
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluauon for
Agency Use Only
t Haw many vehicular tnps per day would be generated by the completed pfoject? It known
mdicate when peak would occur The current office building
generates 75 trips per day or 10 trips during the p m
peak hours Conversion to specialty retail uses would
generate 123 trips per day or 15 trips during the PM
peak hour ITE "Trip Generation", 5th Generation
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation tmpacts d any None
The site is constructed
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Woutd the project resuft m an increased need for public sernce (for example fire protectian
pohce protection heahh care schools other)? It so generafly descnbe
No The site is constructed
b Proposed measures to reduce or cortVol direct fmpacts on public sernces tf any
None The site is constructed
16 UTILITIES
a Ci ~tie vadable at the sde electnrc 1 natural gas + efuse sernce
elepho sandary sewer sephc system other - pll utllities are ,
currently extended to the building
b Descnbe the utddies proposed for the project the ut►Idy prowdmg the sennce and the general
construdion activities on the srte or in the immediate vtcinrty whtch might be needed
Electric and water - Modern,
Sewer - Spokane Co Utilities, Refuse- Spokane Valley
Refuse
C SIGNATURE
I the undersigned swear under the penalty of perjury that the abova responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge I also understand
that should there by any wdiFul misrepresentatton of v+nliful lack of full disclosure on my part the agency rnay v+nthdraw any determination of
nonsignificance that it might issue m reliance upon thts checklist
Date Rugust 20, 1998 Proponent
~
-
Proponent (signature) Address
Phone Number
Person Comptetmg Form John D Konen, David Evans and Associates, Date August 20, 1998
Inc
Phone Number (509) 327-8697
FOR STAFF USE ONLY.
Staff member(s) revie+rAng checklist
Based on this staff review of the environmental checMist and other peRinent information the staff
A Concfudes that there are no probable signfficant adverse impacts and recommends a determinatwn ot nonsigrnficartce
6 Concludes that probable significaM environmental impacts do exist for the cvrrent proposal and recommends a mibgated determination of
nonsignificance vnth condibons
C Conc{udes that there are probable sigrnflcant adverse environmental impacts and recommends determmation of sigmficance
Fdmg Fee $75 00
Rev 2/1/88 10
~
~
* wiap
sCI
" ~
N11
~
;
r Y~--~ ~ y ' ~ JN ~ ~ '
r a.. wAC~ .
r}iE ~LD 10
e~~z NUA zao
x ,
1 ~O*!' . ~
~oN
~
K►~OX ~ " ~'T
►.s ` r
i~ 'a N A ari1K~
~ D pAR
27 Cr_
Z 9oOW
1 m
BPo~
tiV'~ ~ ~y u
~ Q 16
~ F
. t K1~ pa ~p,~1 .
► ~ ~ _ r ~c~
D 3RD
AtiN . ~ z ~ M z ,
~
rA z~
1 0 ~ z~ 1
gv ~ CD ~
. et~ ~ ~ ~ " s tio~ • ,
~ ~
gtN ~ r~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ►ri!'_.
Z Z3
~ ~ x d O %5 1 18~ ~}7 L
t 2v '
17 ir ' QS'W
1
1 ~
N
A
r~ C9 19 PA~`~ ~
1 ~ a R , o ^
19 v
,
x 1
~ 41 ~ r + V1G~N~ ~ MAP
~
N'
Not to Scale
1►,
~
,
a
0C.!
~ ~ ~ ~ y s• I ! ~ - - - - ~ ~
R1 t~ ~3
Q
o
~ rt 11 ~ ~
~ ~ < z D ~ x r d
Q d
»
~ ~ ~ ~ ri~►i~~~~ ~ , d ~~~e~' ~ ~
Q wz'°w
D
t~rou+N <
- _ ~ ~ $
L eo's
~ ►~t n N V ~ 11 ~f
O uC/~ . ~
%-P1NES ROAQ
----------0,OW3.-
~'T'1
~--i
~ ~-:s~ ~ ceKVws
* ~aYf~.X~°' .u o.w n~. AEYl8~1~a'~
s
c~, TLow nnoVI~vG A
r~s
~ . a...+ a...~a -
~ . . -
~S A - I waS-'r471
~
~
0~ 98
ZEmi VicinitY Map
,
_ o .
>
gucKE i nA M~ T a 4 S~ALK ~N
~
U~SO+~ oc THE WIL~
~JA:-_ ~ zoo o .
I 1~ pN TG01~CR ~
~
; x
} W 09
y ti
,
. , , t ~
KNOX -
~
.
, .i.r.... - i
~ 114(}RA MlSS1ON ~
_ p pRK R
IA AX'~l
1 !N ~E ,
27 ~
~ iNTO g00 qYAIDO
OtJ -
~ 0
~ a~ uaUL~ BRooDwAY
AY
~ L9 µASN ~ ~
w ~ ~ •
y~s~
r- ~ tN - ~C~.1f
D 3RO
cr_ - :5FW RD
~
6tN St
41'N a 8
~ ~ .
7'
0 9 'i
~
CC
13-rH
~
<
4 4 ~ ~
t 12~ ` Q ..r~ ~ p 57~N 16TM ~
t f ~ ~ t A
~ 17
~
' ~17 TM
0
t
18 TM 1 ti 9~ ° 71,RRA
19 ~ VIE1N ~
2 ~ 22!BD PARK -
rn
V1CIN17Y MAP
N'`
Not to Scale
i~c'J:~'~ ~ ' t • - . r: • • ~
~ _ ~ . rjL_
~ ~ a:a`rt~ , ~ ► ~ ~ _ i
~4t
. .
~ -+~a~t-►z~ . ~S~ rC ar~a.. ~ r c . x. _ _ _ _ . - , a _ . . - _ - ,,,w,~ .
' 't S I~~ +~,tr.....~... r'~ ■ Y~ ~ , _ ~ H-1j;y+.~~..c . , _ `N-...~ r~~~? ►r_: , ,t
f ♦ . i,j' ~ , . - 'i . ~ 1 ~..._t' -lj` ~
~ ~ ~L! { ~
t`vR1
~ . ~ ~ • y .c~ w
. , wi► ~-a;titi , i ~ - L ~~M~++~'^^+~-~---- • . ~ ~ : : ~ .
i . Oy,'~t'4,:, r . ="i-
'rF
• ~ • •f^,Y' 1. ~ ~ ~4.. r ' ~ ~ ,s +~-pyy~',• - ~M~~i~~ ~ 1~~~~, ~~-~»k~,.- ~ir~~},1~ ; i;~}~t)' ti~~ c ~w- ~1 '
16 ~'~`~"R C ~ ;t' a v ~ p.`' h r11~'`/y ~E4 - ~ - ' ~r~r _ _ '
.r.~.. • _ ~ ; ~ ~ t ~ ~ _•~~N ` ~ ~ _ * . .A~ . . _ _ ~ • ~ - ~ - , ~ • ~ ~
~'-a 'r~ i t : • + ~ ~ . r y,.~ ~`I~..F`' ` ♦ _ ~ _ ~ '
':i~~
~ ' `1 z t~ .1
! ,a . rr ~ ul ~ ~t •.1 , . ~
AltA
S~`~ ` . ~ ? * • ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ' ~
~ ~i ~ ~~k~/~ . • ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ i A ' # ~ ,
, `~~~~~i~~ • ' ~ .r ~ ~ ` a, -i~yS
~ ~ _ l#i~sA~ r' Q 7 ~
Ir
i
~ } t.MMf j ~ OS~ • a` <
~ }
~ ' 'l~ i~ ~ ~ ~ 1~• . _ 1 ~ r
~ I ~ ~ ~ ' '
4.. tr ~
.:Y~ ~ f :i . ~r Ss. ~-t ~
~ ~j~c; da O
14
. ~ ' ~ ,w ~~at f',K ~ ,i . Y ,w r'-j,- ~ J . ~ 1 ~ • • - ~ • ,a',' r'~ '7
P { ~ ~"~s 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~t i
. + . . ~ ~t~
~ ~ ~ ~~~~•~l~ ~ ~7~~ ~ ~
~ 1 1 y
' ~ S. O ~ • ~i ~ ~.r Zui/ s ' ~ ~ ~ ",~a~„~ ~ ~ . * ' ( W~
"7 A . y ~ • C r -
' •#'$iti~ . 44
d 0 •'3
+N a• .•y•a~'i 7 ,~r,
. ~
.
~ • , "
, .
,
i _ ~ ~ ~ • y !~~F
r k '
~ ~ ~ ` x ~ i' ' 7 ~ 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~ •r j r . . r
~ i ~ : ~ J • . r • ~ ` ~ ~jx ~ ~LA~'
'r.,,;. ,j. : ~ ~ ' ~ !~wt . i • ~ •
y ' • fi ~ • , _ ~ ~ y ~ 6 , f y - ~
.s r s t • - 4 - ~ - ~
~ ~.i i~ .r M ~ * F~' ~1 _ ' ~i~~'.- • i~ .~r'
w
A I ~ ~ 7''~~,~• ~ . .l
~ y 4. IY 1~~ - i i~ ` 7~ L' j"~` ~ • s,~ t ~~?f ~•~3t~ .
~ ~ { t~,r,✓~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ,~.e
~ ~ r ~ .1'i R~. ~ ~r ~ ' r~~~~
~ ~ -
. . w .
. - ' _ ' t~y t
~ ~ - . . _
fm
~
- i
Parcel 452112603
Owner CATLOW CRAIG
CoOwner
I
Owner Address
a
1625 S RIDGEMOUNT DR 469 VERADALE WA 99037
rD
r
Site Address
320 S PINES RD SPO ,
~pragula
Legal Description
WELDON SUB 1STADD L3 133
lst
- ~
3rd -I ~
~ ~ ~u fl r
4th___
FIT
6-.A
th_
~
Fi \ ~th _
~ - r` -1 i
Notice This is not a legal document Dala depicted on this map is general & subJect to consiant revision It is mtended for reference
use only Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency