Loading...
1989, 07-14 App for Waiver of ViolationTO Spokane County Department of Building & Safety JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR , Planning Department FROM:alom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator 44 DATE: /44 i9ff RE File Number: WVE . f S g, Address: R/ .13Jo Eare-hpi Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below: - The applicant shall contact the Department of Building and Safety at the earliest possible stage of U design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department; e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations, and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. LJ The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is required. LJ Requirements of Fire District No. need to be satisfied during the building permit process. - The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of �— Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Building and Safety determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Building and Safety feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shall participate and cooperate in this process. n The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction L_J and proximity of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimum fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required. 1--1 We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. U i pecific comment, are as follows; 71/:971 Oy t,44k/15-:-4, �J/ ,670/` l/ TLD WEST 1303 BROADWAY SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 • 0050 • TELEPHONE (509) 456-3675 .j SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE SID(CralWellE cat frirr PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 NOTIICIE OIF SPOKANE COUNTY 9LOFJIING ADJUSTOR IPU DATE: August 9, 1989 TIME: 10:15 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department 2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 II.IIC HIEAIP3IING Case #5 File: WVE-15-89 WAIVER OF VIOLATION TO SIDE YARD SETBACK REOUIREMENTS: LOCATION: Generally located approximately 200 feet south of Liberty Avenue and east of and adjacent to Edgerton in the SW 1/4 of Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44EWM. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Waiver of Violation to allow 0 foot side yard setback for an existing carport, whereas, the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in Section 4.05.110 requires a 5 foot setback from an abutting side property line for each story of a building. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban CROSSOVER: UR 3.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban SITE SI7F,. Approximately 9165 square feet APPLICANT: M. W. and Judith Hilsabeck N. 3310 Edgerton Road Spokane, WA 99212 ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST, POSSIBLY CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A $100.00 FEE. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.) 1 WVE-15-89 pee. $, o,,, A i o7`-p//o pee 1r° AtcprifigaZ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Certificate of Exemption No.: /A Application No.: W1/F-/,r S7 Name of Applicant: M.N/ , Tuff, ((^ i/caiecjC Agent: Y N Street Address: N 33/6 Ed Y Ra City: OIU.Lxl" State: Zip ppnn Phone - Home: Code: 77� I� Work: Agents No. Name of Property Owner(s)• Lass( 2s above Street Address• City: Zip Phone - Home: State. Code: Work. REQUESTED ACTION(S) Variances) Waiver of Violat ob (Circle appropriate action): Conditional Use Permit Temporary Use/Structure Nonconforming Lot/Use Other: FOR STAFF USE ONLY CODE: ORDINANCE t/ Cite Regulations Section(s): 7.O . / 1 p Properly Violation/ Section: 6Township: Z 5- Range: Y y Size: 9MM C�Enforcement: N BQS Existing Zone: AS Comp. Plan Des.: 1/46/D4 Crossover (4R 3.5- LEGAL .SLEGAL PSSA()N MAO N ASA() N FIRE DIST.; l CHECKED B U Hearing Date: fr'igt&C 9� /989 Personnel Taking in Application.(./ Existing Use of Property: Sinl�(a Feu, • Dwells t�.y Describe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS above: Witti p - Or vrnhtiey. gr side tJ.avd Seffiack C,S-') rertvP, Pwf ¢n &(nu) Q'Se/haat Street Address of Property: N. 3 3 (O Edgger{oy Legal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable): ORCNAR.n AVF ADD N AS -FT of S13n FT OF TR q3 Parcel No(s): Q $/? - `f 31t Source of Legal: ASSesc'Ov} 4/ 6 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor• 111/4 What interest do you hold in the property? 0 Wig eYS Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:n,rita,-t,� Avenue Adtiii/ny, 1 SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCAE. Signed: (Alto ks7 Address: tf\ . 'Z2, /f) F�Q�v Phone No. �ja, m'f Date: 6-1' -S'" Notar`. ♦: .L. -_ Date: N / (Over) Revised 3-4-88 A. BURDEN OF PROOF It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic case. Accordingly. you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed. 13. SIGN -OFF 13Y COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES 1. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT a) Proposed method of water supply: b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. (Signature) (Date) (Sign -of 2. fOUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. has been informed of requirements and standards. 3. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB) [ 1 A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of re uirements and standards. —� fel-i) ( — es, r 8, (Signature) (Date (Sign -off Waived) [ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of water system requirements and standards. 1 1 The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of sewage disposal requirements and standards. The applicant (Signature) (Date) (Sign -o', Waive 4. WATER PURVEYOR• a) js/is not located within the b) c) d) The proposal service area. The proposal district. We ,are/are Satisfactory proposal. . . to/ is not located within not able to serve this site f outside CWSSAI boundary of our future the boundary of our current with adequate water. arrangements have/have not been made to serve (Signature) (Date) 5. ,SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: (Sign -of this (If other than Spokane County) [ 1 A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards (Signature) (Date) Page 4 of 4 (Sign -o NAME: M,W. t Xtctilh /whet FILE #: WI/E 7/5--"/ II. WAIVER OF VIOLATION (Section 4.25.030 f. of Zoning Ordinance) A. Was project erected in good faith and with every intent to conply with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, explain how you exercised good faith and intent and still ended up in violation of the Zoning Ordinance? Gam: Diu .A0 444 , t.4z V\00ADS, ita_�A.n q,,, 0 • 0-+ n B. Whi e not complying with every detail of the provisions of the ordinance, exp ain how the project is consistent with the spirit or intent of the ord nance? b3 t Tieta tYCJS c lScu_e 05144