1989, 05-31 Setback InvestigationINVESTIGATION WORKSHEET
PC, N (),36?
Date 5 — -3 i — /
Address (� p vl -3-5 l C C Qvi s
Parcel No. o4,64 13 )_ __ Zone
Occupant 1 �{ L -t CCja louJe Phone
Address CjCc CLnle0A)
Nature of •I``nveeIs__tigation Building ❑ Fire ❑ Code
� CComplliiance
Describe �� W- — ��`d{� I' 9-1104
±
Status Resolved/Date 6V7:07 Dead/Date
Prosecutor/Date
Date
Comments..•
C f\
3131`(
7t,04,Lr2
Cn!5`gc'l
6W$ C'lt. tia+0S IN - newcFsQc - to
c_ANNIv\3G, art W AxurAz. e F t%lnLRTLoN
'Recu> cic_ - ODA \-1 S
-7(1(1eR
No -r ton) Cueecn, r .-ACxcikioA (j2,t-el-I e.r
3o.DVW c • -
- - - -te
p�C1��
/i•
_
/ /
, 6 luvr•-r / _ 5-9--. �� [a
`cy
rt,
7
Investigator -
Recheck Date
•
IF rilliWnintut
JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
May 31, 1989
Spokane County
Department of Building & Safety
MR. MIKE HILSABECK
North 3310 Edgerton Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
RE: Permit Requirements - North 3310 Edgerton Road
Dear Mr. Hilsabeck:
Our district inspector reports that a carport has been constructed
on your property located at the above-mentioned address, Spokane
County parcel number 06543-4316, and, in checking our records, we
are unable to locate a valid permit. A building permit is required
for this carport under Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code as
adopted by Spokane County. It was also noted that the carport does
not meet the minimum setback requirement to the side property line.
Should our records be in error, or should you have any information
that would otherwise be helpful in resolving this matter, please
contact us as soon as possible.
If a permit has not been obtained, Section 304(e) of the Uniform
Building Code requires that a double fee be charged wheneverany
work for .which a permit is required has commenced without first
obtaining the permit. The intent of this letter is to waive the
double fee, provided, you take the appropriate action to obtain a
permit within ten (10) days of the date of this letter.
A recheck of our files will be conducted immediately following the
time frame specified above. Your attention to the above will negate
the need for further action.
Again, please contact this office as soon as possible in order, that
this matter may be resolved. Our office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, feel free' to contact us either in
person at the address below or call 456-3675.
Sincerely,
,izyy 7 -
Jeffrey E. Forry
Senior Building Technician
WEST 1303 BROADWAY
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 • 0050
• TELEPHONE (509) 456-3675
r
N 3 3 /o
fert v14
rcQa�x. c
f LJ
.,iemi
-delfataid i �
Lpbq
tec 472,7
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A WAIVER OF
VIOLATION TO SIDE YARD SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS: FILE: WVE-15-89;
M. W. AND JUDITH HILSABECK
PARCEL NUMBER: 06543-4316
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION:
)
)
)
)
)
ADDRESS:
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS
DECISION AND ORDER
N. 3310 EDGERTON ROAD
The applicant requests a Waiver of Violation to allow 0 foot side yard setback for
an existing carport, whereas, the 'Spokane • County ZoningOrdinancein Section
4.05.110 requires a 5 foot setback from an abutting side property line for each
story of a building. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to Section(s) 4.25
of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
PROJECT LOCATION:
Generally located approximately 200 feet south of Liberty Avenue and east of and
adjacent to Edgerton in the SW 1/4 of Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44EWM.
OPPONENTS OF RECORD: None
PUBLIC HEARING:
After examining all available information on file with the application the Zoning Adjustor
conducted a public hearing on August 9, 1989, rendered a verbal decision on August 9,1989
and rendered a written decision on August 17, 1989.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION
1. The proposal is described above.
2. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban. The proposal uses are generally consistent with this category.
3. The site is zoned Agricultural Suburban, which places a three (3) foot height
limitation on residential fences within the front yard.
4. The Zoning Adjustor received testimony that the applicant's building contractor
advised them only to get permission from their adjoining property owner for the expansion\
The applicants did obtain approval from their neighbor prior to construction.
5. The applicants were advised in late May, 1989 by the Building and Safety
Department that no permits had been issued in conjunction with the construction. The
applicants are prepared to obtain all necessary permits if the requested Waiver is granted.
6. The immediate property owner adjoining the carport under consideration spoke in
favor of the proposal. He found no detriment in it and felt it improved property values in the
area.
7. . No party or agency indicated that the carport as expanded created any problem to
the public health, safety or welfare.
8. Based upon the testimonies of the applicant, adjoining property owner and written
comments received supporting the project, the Zoning Adjustor finds the applicant made a good
faith error in constructing the carport prior to obtaining the proper County permits.
5. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW pursuant to
WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b).
6. Proper public notice has been given to all parties required by state statute and local
ordinance.
CASE NO. WVE-15-89 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
7. The Zoning Adjustor finds the applicants by testimony and picture exhibits have
satisfied Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requirements (4.25.030 []) for the approval of
the Waiver of Violation.
DECISION AND ORDER
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the
proposal, and directs to compliance with the following:
The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest and shall run with the land.
I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The project not be expanded beyond that contained in the file and presented to the
Zoning Adjustor without first obtaining required County approvals.
II. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is
required.
2. Inspection of the as -built structure is required.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE
RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10) DAY APPEAL PERIOD.
HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND
INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL.
DATED this 17 day of August, 1989.
D T, glas S. Adams
Zoning Adjustor
Spokane County, Washington
FILED -
1) Applicant (Certified/Return Receipt Mail)
2) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. •
APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A $100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE
BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260. (Sections
4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance)