ZE-0005-98
• ~
Canee1c, F,i~ ENGINEER' S REVIEVVSHEE1,
Date FiiLL;
Qbte Ag liutlt k'latLs RmrivrJ
~ZO~' ~~ILE # Z~1 _0005"98
REad Pluns Appruvexi
Dutr Ro
\;w Rn:►tl Stand3rds 5-15•95 Mylar
Companion File ff:
I-iearing Date ' al~ 1-1 Time: ~13P4 H Numbrr: Itelateci File
79
Tcctusicat Review Dau: 06/25!1998 ''R Time: 01:15 Building Dept r:
Re.-view Date: R T'ittw: R Numbc:r: '1'ECH RLVIEW
Date Receiveci: 06; 1?/i998 Revie%% Tyne: Laree l.oc
tio. Lcx No. Acre i?
Proieet Name: tfR•3.5 & ItR-10 TO I-1 PttiECROFT BUSLNLS5 C'I'It Range-Tawrnhip-Sc~ctints: 44- 25 - 10
Site .qddress: E P1NCSlS EUCLIDIN GRACE YaRCEus): (first 20)
Applicant Nante: RAMM ASSOC-IDLOr. PA7'I`I Phonc (509) 534-8486 45102.9008 asios.9ar_
Applicant Address: 25 5 ALTAMON? Phone 2a
SPqKANL•, WA 99202
t~ (~orxlt[iQns I~tlitecJ:
[}a
Flu~ucl I~n~e No Water 4 Sewer Sch<x)l 361 Fire 1 Phone
Billing Owner: MIL[.ER. JOHIr' Enginecr PATRJCiC ! MOORE
,-1Jlrrss: :1clclres: PO BOX 18708 Com(any INLA;v'D PACIFIC E.NGINEERING
SY41CANE. wa 992108 Address: 707 W 7TH AVG S7'E 200
SPOKANE WA 99204
I'hcmr: f'hc,t►c:: i50914GG-8~I(X) Phark:: 509458•6840
Fax: 5W458•6844
Signcz! N:ime
I3uildine A+ 456-3675 / Piannin~ # 456-220' Contaa: JOHN PEDERSON
DATE TECHNICALI.. COhiPLET'E ~ ~ "%d
DATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
DATE PAY FEF,S RI:CEIVL'D
DATE PRIORITY FEL5 RECE[VEU COPY TO ACCOU"NG
r
FINAL PLA'r FEES COAIPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING
/ 1 NOTICE TO PUDLIC / NO'I'ICE TO PUE3LIC 1 3 4 6 COkiPI_ETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
In-(?ut 11 [►hOut 02 Ir:-t:)ut #3
DFSIGN DEViATIOh DATES IN-OUT
Li-Ow /A In-Out #5 ln-Uut x6
! ! BOND QU4NTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATE 80ND RECEIVED BOND AM01IN'1' RF:CI:I`'EU
DATE BUn'U REILF.ASE - D:tT'E F;OND ltFUl1CED AOND R:1I_ANCE
Eicaring Datc Dccwvn Appuovr.1 Drnicd coatiiEUrd Appcaled E3CC
Appcaled w Cuurt AprrUved Dcniec! Contirnu«l Final Projrct Status
STAMPED MYLARS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
/ ; STAMPEU 208 LOT t'L.1NS TO SECRETARY (5ANDY)
1 J
C t
. ~
1 STAFF REPORT TO `THE HEARING EXAMINER
A.1 File#: ZE-5-98 .
A 1--nmu DIVISION OF BUfLDING AND PLANNING
SPOKANE COUNn
HEARING DATE: September 9, 1998 FILE ZE-5-98
PROJECT PLANNER: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) to Industrial Park (I-1) on approximately 15 acres for those uses allowed in the
Industria) Park (I-l ) zone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zone reclassification request as
conditioned.
Proiect Data
Project Location: Generally located east of Pines Road (SR-27) and
south of. Euclid Avenue in the NW '/4 of Section 10,
- Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM.
Parcel Number(s) 45102.9008, and a portion of 45105.9072
Owner: Lumberyard lnvestments, Inc. c/o John Miller, P.O.
' Box 18708, Spokane, VVA. 99208
Agent: Ramm Associates, lnc. c/o Patti Idlof, 25 S.
- Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202
Comprehensive Plan Urban and Rural.
~Designation:
Zoning: - Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) ai1d Rural
. Residential-10 (RR-10).
Existing Land Use: Single family residence, accessory structures and
undeveloped.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:
• Not`th: Zoning classifications to the north include Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22), Light Tndustrial (1-2) and
Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991
consistent with the Program to Implement the
Spokane County Zoning Code, previously
established as Residential Office (RO), Restricted
Industrial (Rt) and Commercial (C) in 1984 (94-
84C) under the now expired Spokane County Zoninty
Ordinance. The adjoining area to the north is
currently vacant and undeveloped.
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998
1 of 7
~ r
t ~
• South: 7oning to the south is Urban Residential-22 (LTR-22)
established in 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code,
previously established as Multiple Family Suburban
(MFS) in 1979 (254-79C) and 1980 (120-84C) under
the now expired Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
Land uses to the south include offices, multifamily
residences and vacant undeveloped property.
• East: Adjoining zoning to the east is Rural Residential-10
- - (RR-10) established in 1991 consistent with the
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning
- Code, and previously established as Agricultural (A)
. in 1942 (24-42) under the now expired Spokane
- County Zoning Ordinance. Land uses to the east
- include vacant undeveloped property and the former
, Walk in the Wild Zoo site (see Mirabeau Pt. Project
_ fi les).
- •West: Zoning classifications to the west include Urban
: _ - - Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Urban Residentiai-22
• _ (UR-22) established in 1991 consistent with the
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning
Code previously established as Agricultural (A) in
- 1942 (24-42) and Multiple Family Suburban (MFS)
. in 1979 (158-79C). Land uses to the west include an
elementary school, single family residential and
_ undeveloped property.
Known Land Use Proposals and Recent land use actions in the project vicinity
Recent Project Approvals in the. include the Mirabeau Pt. Project which includes a
-Area of this Projeet Comprehensive Plan amendment for 156.8 acres
from Rural to the Urban and Major Commercial
- designations, an amendment to the Spokane County
' Arterial Road Plan, and a zone reclassification for
115.5 acres from Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) to
Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business
(B-3) zones. (see ZE-37-96). The Mirabeau Pt.
master plan includes 236.2 acres of a mixed use
master planned development that combines public
and private recreational, educational, entertainment,
residential and business uses. (see Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) issued on
October 2, 1997 and Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) issued on June 12, 1998). Other
land use actions in the project vicinity include zone
reclassifications ZE-1 58-79C, ZE-120-84C, ZE-254-
79C, ZE-96-84C, and ZE-22-78C. Additional land
' use actions have occurred south of the subject
propert}, near the intersection of Pines Road and
Mansfield Avenue. The property north of Euclid
Avenue and east of Pines Road was also subject to a
preliminary plat (PE-1567-89) to divide
approYimately 35 acres into eight (8) lots, and a zone
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998
2of7
a •
' - reclassification from Light] ndustria] (Ir2) and Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) tv Urban Residential-22
(~TR-~?), Ne1gI1~JOrhood $usit~eSS (B-1) and
Cvmmuniiy Business (B-2). PE-1567-89 was - - _ ' ' ° _ - ' aPproved by the Hearing ~~carrainer ~omrr~ittee on
February 23, 1989 artd subsequently extended to
- - = - _ Septernber 1, 1998.
' Land bivision Status: The subject parce[ was segregated thraugh apprcaval
of Certificate af Exemption CE-3-93 (A) in 1993,
, - , - per Section 3.3(d) of fihe now expired Spokane
Couiity Short Plat C)rdinance. The project
- - - ' - proponents have also submitted a concurrent short
, plat (see SP-1 158-98) to divide the suhject prnperty
into four lotsftracts. Short Plat application SP- 11 S8-
- 98 was accepted by fhe T3ivision af Buiiding &
- - - - _ - , ' Ptanning on June 26, 1998 and the administrative
decision has no# been made.
-Shorellne -D esignatpon: 'Not appiicable. -
--Mi er`-Purveyor:_=_.-'_- , - - - _ Irvin Water DistTicfi #6. The subject Property is
, , - . - _ - - - current[y outside Irvin Water Distr3ct s corv
rate
he
- = - - - limits. A I'~atrce of Ir~tention ar~c~ approval y t
Baundary Review Board is required if annexatian is
arat;capated. (see Boundary,Review Board letter
dated 5118199)
-sewage Disposal: Spakane CQUnty public sewer system. Use of
private wells and water systerns 1s prohifaited.
--hre D-Rs1ric'k-:_ SRokane County ire T}istrict No. 1
Schvol District ~ - - - - - - - - ~ East Valley School DistrictNv. 36 1.
Ne'2rest Ar-terial-Ond Distanc+e. The 5pokane County Arteria3 Road PIan identifies
Panes Road as a state highNvay. Eucrid Avenue is
identifed as a lacal aecess street.
Neighhorhaod-A~~o'ciation: Nane.
❑ This proposal is located inside the IUGA. -
0 This proposai is not lacated within a Jaint Planning Area.
• This prvposal xs Ivcated inside aPublic Transpartation Benefit Area (PTBA)e
• Th+s proposal is located outside the 1000' notificat4on bounrlary of designated
IVaturar Resource Lands.
GMAlCritical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area (PSSA i A5A): The subject property is located withi« the
Priarlty Sewer Serrrice Area (PSSA) and
- Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay
zone,
Fish &Wildlife Wabitat ConservatRon Spokane Critical Area rnaps show that the ~
Areas: , subject pfoperty is a priority habitat (LJrb~~
'Natural Open Space). Consultation with
the Washington State Depart,ment of
Wrld I ife confirms that a I-lab;#'a~
Management Plan is not requ'rred. (5ee
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - 5epkember 9, 1998
3 flf7
Y ~
e-mail from Kevin RobinettE, Habitat
' Biologist dated August 17, 1998.
Floodplain: ~ Not applicable.
Geologically Hazardous Areas: None illustrated per Spokane County
Critical Area maps.
Wetlands: None illustrated per Spokane County
Critical Area maps.
SEPA
❑ Mitigated DNS issued August 18, 1998
0 Comment period ended September 7, 1998
Noticinq
Published: August 21, 1998
The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal was August
25, 1998.
Site Posted Deadline: The deadline for posting public notice on the site was August 25, 1998.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete): June 12, 1998
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: July 23, 1998
Date Notice of Decision is Due: November 20, 1998 •
Reviewinq Avencies
14 Agencies were notified on June 16, 1998 and August , 1998. Comments were due June 25, 1998
and August , 1998.
Agencies Notified _Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
- Received Received - Received Received
Division of Engineering yes 6/25/982 Spokane Transit No
7/9/98 Authority
9/ 1 /98
Division of Engineering - Yes 6/18/98 Boundary Review Board Yes 6/19/98
Development Services _ S/l 8/98
Section
Spokane Regional Health Yes 6/25/98 East Valley School No 6/19/98
District District No. 363 8/18/98
WA State Department of Yes 6/25/987 Spokane County Fire Yes 6/24/98
Transportation 7/8/98 District No. 1
8/ 17/98
Division of Utilities Yes 6/29/98 Long Range Planning Yes 6/18/98
Division
Spokane County Parks, No Spokane County No
Recreation and Fair Division of Utilities -
Stormwater
Irvin Water District No Spokane Regional No Transportation Council
Responses from the Public: None.
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998
4of7
. ~ y
Description of the Site:
The subject property is approximately 15 acres in size and currently undeveloped. One sing(e family
residence and accessory structures are locatcd at the northeast corner of the site. The existing residence
will remain until project phasing necessitates removal. Site topography is relatively flat with steeper
slopes in the southeastern portion. Site vegetation includes native trees, grasses and agricultural
production. Euclid Avenue to the north is improved with two paved lanes without curb or sidewalk. Pines
Road to the west is improved with four paved lanes with curb and sidewalk.
Backqround:
The zone reclassification was submitted to the Division of Building and Planning on June 12, 1998 and the
application was accepted as "technically complete" on July 23, 1998. A Notice of Application was issued
on July 23, 1998 with a 14 day public comment period ending on August 6, 1998.
Staff Analvsis:
Proiect Description:
The project is a zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-
10) to lndustrial Park (I-l) on approximately 15 acres for development of an industrial office park as
provided for in the proposed Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
Site Plan review: The site plan of record illustrate a"business center" consisting or six (6) typical buildings ranging in size
from 27,100 square feet to 30,000 square feet with total office square footage of 60,000 square feet and
light industrial at 108,400 square feet. The site plan also illustrates off-street parking, 50 foot structural
setbacks to the south, east and west 100 foot structural setbacks to Pines Road, 40 foot maximum building
height, 21 % building coverage, perimeter fencing, 20 feet of Type I Landscaping along the east property
line, and 20 to 25 feet of Type III Landscaping along the south, west, and north property lines. The site
plan of record also notes that modification of landscaping requirements per Section 14.806.080(a) of the
Spokane County Zoning Code is requested at the site perimeter where the adjacent use is not residential.
As per Section 14.806.040.1( fl of the Zoning Code, 20 feet of Type I Landscaping is required where
industrial zones/uses adjoin residential zones. In this instance, the subject property adjoins residential
zones along the east, south and westerly property lines and the site plan shows 20 feet to 25 feet of Type III
Landscaping along the south and southwesterly property lines in lieu of the required 20 feet of Type I
Landscaping. As previously noted, the applicant has requested modification of landscaping requirements
per Section 14.806.080, but the site plan of record does not include calculations to show that more than
15% of the site area being landscaped.
Typical signage detail is provided and notes compliance with the signage standards specified by Section
14.630.345 of the Industrial Park (I-1) zone. Access is provided by one access point to Pines Road and
four (4) access points to Euclid Avenue. The site plan of record does not provide specific detail regarding
architectural treatment or design as specified by Section 14.630.390. This section states that 1) the e,cterior
design and appearance of buildings shall include strong vertical or horizontal lines to convey a definite
feeling of massiveness and volume; 2) the color of building and screening walls shall be limited to brick
red, white or earth tones; 3) all screening walls shall be of the same coordinated color and materials as the
buildina. •
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998
5of7
n a
Excluding the above noted eYCeptions, the site plan of record does demonstrate compliance with the
applicable development standard of the Spokane County Zoning Code and Industrial Fark (I-1) zone.
Detailed site plan review will be necessary to determine compliance with all applicable development
standards and the Hearing Examiner has the option of requiring further site plan review at a public hearing
or allowing administrative review by staff.
Site Plan Data:
Buildino-, Setbacks Froposed Required
Pines Road 100' + 100'
Euclid Avenue 50' + 50'
South Property Line 50' + 50'
East Property Line 50' + 50'
Parking 634 To be determined in
site plan review
Buildin2 SauareFt.
Office = 60,000 square feet
Light Industrial = 108,400 square feet
Building Height = 40 feet
• Site Area = 1 S± acres
Signage: Per 14.630.345
Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan category for the property is Urban. The Urban category is intended to provide
the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses, intensive
residential development, and public facilities and services. Since Urban areas will be the most intensively
developeci of all the categories, it is primarily a residential category of single family, two-family, multi-
family, and condominium buildings along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and
recreational facilities. The more intensive land uses such as light industrial and neighborhood business
will be located near the heavily traveled streets. Section D, Noncompatible Uses of the Urban category
states "Due to the variety and mix of land uses and activity found in the Urban category, there are few land
use activities that would be inappropriate. Many uses may require screening or other performance
standards to make them compatible with one another. Section D also states "heavy industrial uses would
not be compatible within urban areas." Applicable Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the
Urban category include Goal 1.6, Objective 1.6.a, and Decision Guidelines 1.6.1, 1.5.1, 1.5.2. The cited
policies encourage an orderly pattern of development and encourages land use proposals that conform to
County policies regarding delivery of services, conform to transportation plans and policies, and resolve
significant impacts upon existing utilities and transportation systems. The Urban category also encourages
buffering or landscaping to mitigate the differences beriveen proposed developments and existing uses. A
small portion of the northeast corner of the site is within the Rural Comprehensive Plan designation.
Because the subject property adjoins and is partially within the Rural category, the transition area
guidelines explained in the introduction and glossary sections of the Comprehensive Plan are applicable. A
transition area is identified as the area along the boundary between rivo or more land use categories. The
transition area recognizes that a specif c proposal may cross or be adjacent to these boundaries and that this
are can allow development complying with either of the land use map categories dependent upon the
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998
6of7
, •
decision makers site specific approval. Utilizing the transition are definition, the proposal can comply with
either of the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban or Rural categories. In this instance,
the Urban category is the predominant category and the proposed zone reclassification has been evaluated
for consistency with the applicable policies of the Urban category. The proposed zone reclassification is
generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category in that the
subject property adjoins a State highway, is served by public facilities with adequate capacity, and the site
plan of record illustrates spatial separation and perimeter buffering to mitigate impacts upon adjoining
residential uses/zones. '
Zonina:
The purpose of the proposed Industrial Park (I-1) is to provide for those high technology industrial and
incidental commcrcial uses of a light intensity, having no objectionable effect on adjacent properties.
Development standards within the Industrial park (I-1) zone are intended to provide compatibility with and
protection to surrounding residential and commercial properties by minimizing traffic, noise, glare,
vibration, odors, etc. Sites in the Industrial Park (I-1) zone should have primary access to a principal or
minor arterial and general characteristics of industrial park areas include paved roads, sidewalks, public
sewer and water, park-like grounds and attractive buildings. The proposed zone reclassification and site
plan of record implement the purpose and intent of the requested Light Industrial (1-1) zone in that the
subject property has direct access to a Principal Arterial, provides public services and demonstrates
cornpliance with the development standards of the requested Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
Staff Recommendation:
The proposed zone reclassificaticti is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Decision guidelines of the
Urban category and serves to implement the purpose and intent of the proposed Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
The Division of Building & Planning recommends approval of the zone reclassification, as conditioned.
Attachments A. Maps
~ Vicinity Map
• Site Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
B. Agency and Public Comments
C. Conditions of Approval •
ZE-5-98
Staff Report - September 9, 1998 •
7of7
D
M A1f7°ACHMEIVT A
MA►PS
VICINPTY MAP
SiTE PLAN
CONIPRENF_NSlVE PLAN M„i4►►P
ZONING MAN
.
. ~
~r f V
~ ~ .
~
~ Map
• ~~c
} ~ r► y
~c
. . r ~ c; .
~ - ► ' ~ . :
. t_ ~ t ~ ~ ' •
- ~ • ~ t , 1 ~ ~ t : - .
~ • ~ ~ ! ti, ~ , i ~ -
4 - . • ~ ' ~ t ` : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
. Qr~:~ ~ i---~ - j ~m . ~ ~ ~ ~ l•.,,i..t~ rc
~ , ~ -~s~ r3 ~ ~ 11 ~ \ f , ~ • ,
. ..,,J
~ j'; : - ,f~,• . , , ~ f~-#~ L ~ ~ z , . ~
~ f ~ . ~ -s'''' ~
' ';~~ji,•{ ~ . ~ ' .
` ' ~ ~ 1 • , . ~ • ~ •r~ t~ r j .
' ~1~ / :-~1,.' /i' • . • 3 , t.
1 ~ ' 1 -
iAojECT
~rt . 1 ~ Ji ~ 1 . _ 1 t - _
bs
~ _ _ . 1 ~ _ - . t - •
~ l~` ~ ~ 1 ` ~Ci N~-
~ J ~ / i ~ + , --Y-- = _ ~ ~ `
ez c on ~ ~ - t• ~ - ''r, , tr1Znd 5Pp1c,A
! 1
~~t~,., ;E ZnvO C -
_t/F~
_7
`C . upriv
t;;n~ " ~ rk• s.
a
le
U.
. - - t Y~h~s-w `
Sn~- ,~1, rr • ~'•"Y`. ; .i. `
~S= h ~ ~i Y~
"i z
;
► ! ~ ` ~ _ ` .
~ J% ~ ~ ~C . ~
~
• - J~
~ , , ~ • ~ . ~ ~ , . eV rl
, ) . . 'r ~ • :
, ~ ' ~ ' ~ , , ` 5
' a ~ : i ' ' s ' _`.f . • ~ ~ . ~ ,i ~ _ r !
, ~,Icri ' ~ • t ~ ,
` ~,1 Y, % •t ~ '
~ . . .1 ~ . ~
/ , ' ' • -1-"'''"' .
_ • - -
vow" ~AP
07123198
Not to Scale
1
~~~'~-•^i~COUNTY
I
j 81498
~reUl!f1itiGAiiD PL?N';f'!G
r•r~ PINECROFT BUSINESS
CENTER
EUGLID ROAd
LpCATtO IN A PoRiION Dl
Kr I/4 01 THC rVI11 01
tJ A~'C v.lf. 11L~~~ j.I.( L IC9V:R'l. l I 1
/ ~ y !UI i I I I I!°, I I I I I~ • I~ ~ 9URDINC A%D 20NI%C I~fD3Lafl08
o ~ . 1 l I U I I l 1 I I~I II•~ <DI I I I It°1111.11 II I I I~I M I I~ 0~SH-: -
_
.r . ~ `
,
~ ~ - I w»r uR I ~n. n.a ~I I
Z
. Q. . ~ ~ J . ~ . ..r~. ~
~J hc+r • i~~~
~ ' / ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ , " O / M i ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ • X ' ~ ' I w ~w ~ 1 ( N !w ✓ i.N
, _ _ ! . ° ~ ` . ~ ~ L ~ ' i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 h
~ ~ ~ 1 I T N , ~ , I 11)4 11 I I I W I I I I I U~
~ ~~1~~111~ ~ IMl~ u~ ~1~ ~ . G .,~~,r,~ w~
~ ~ ~ \ nr
°x o
l;i'~';
r~jj1~~11~~~ .
• ~ ~ ~ ~~1i 1z' VICINITY bIAP
I I 1% , '~Ill I w~w.n ~ n+hlw.'.~..r.~ Vu w I.+.. w w~M•~•• •
_~1~41 ~ f ~ j Y~r1 • ~N~r wrw/ 4~ ~ I~.1~ In „ t .
I I n'~~ mUifJCtJTII t\) r7 V ~ U l r M~o+ M1• 1~ M~~r.~w • tuw~. ~..rs• F- 00-010
~~l ~ tV~v1v 1Jl`!~ ~ 'm f ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rw • a"' .~w....w.~ ~r . ir... ~ w..w'~u.~ •.a.. I(~ I
1 .+n''v ~ / i . ea+ .-~i«.r, ..~.~.M1..~ 7-4-GE
~ ~ _ ~.i IVI1~271 i.~.~• `M. ~n~ ~ ~ai ~ .~.~..n I TR7
. ~"t ~
Q
1 oi 1
~
~
~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ 4~~ t
~ ' ' ,'r, ~ytt~tl•j~'~l~f ~fp
i ~ ~a' ~"'~~7, ~
.
.
d
~ ~ : r.~. • . y
, ~ • y.. ~+~3 ~ ° t
li
~ ~ • ~ i n ir~ ~'~M1 ;1..y,,~~ ,yr.ty~~'~C,. } b
W
.~""Y' Sti~ ~M1 'S
i
. r3 .
• r
' I .1 . 1 ~=~~~~j; •.:i1Ll.\n~' ~y~
-r ~ 1tA
. ~ ~ y . ~ ~ar~i +V:w~.~;~'~ , +;~*r,~~''-~Y R~+~r, °j`~'y a~'~'w
17V
~ , r, • \ ~,~A~~'~e{-3; ,5~, ~~1~ }r.
,,w : ' ''O . ' . • ~ UA .
, , . . . ~ . . ~ . ~
J ' ° Z• ~
.
. . . . . . .
F
,
, ~ { u'-i •
. ~
t
. ~
_5~98
-11AZ U R-3. 1-2 lt#~-22
UR-3.5
• ~ - ~
~ 1-2 B-3
3 ~ ~3
3 'UR-7
~ 0
_ ~
. ~
iJ R-3.v Rr2:~
~ F~Eti _
UPAS VR-
j UR-3S
U Rt5---.o
~ . . . . r' ~
3.5 UR-22, -2
~ UR-22
URb3.6 Fi-10
-~1F-?2
-3.5
iJR-22 ~
~ 5 -OP-22
UlIZ22 ~ ~--{I~~V'n
U I R~ =
~ UR-3.5 Z4122-1: ~ 22
~ V UFbl.S ~ UF I-UR-22
R-3.5 .
i _
IP'"
YJFlr`L'~
~ Vp2m + I
~ o r ~ `-UR~?2 R-10
. 2d - ~ ~
~ 1 I B-3
1-2 p
UR-22 -UR-22 2
Y • - _ i j~~~~- _ . . , ''-~i- ; ~ ;E • , w. ` t
- - . . . . ~ ~ 'V,; ~ :'..'':.:~~;.~<•;;~2:.;~ ' ~ 1? ~ ~F
.f ~~3f: ~,22~- -2 ~a' Z~
13-2
y .
AOAL$OIIig
, E;2., ~ :s.> ~ ~
fli
U ~
•r.. ~ . "U `v~ ~ . . ..a........! 7
:t~ . .
yp'
rr
`
U --U
F~-22
m ~
V~~~'~~ JR'22'~'~
F.~22
~ .5 ~ UR,-3
-u
E UR-22 ' U Fk3S ~ ~ UF~'S 1
4:R-22 ~UR-22 ~ .
UR-22 . ( ~ UR-12-~~~ C
S• UR-3.5 UR-3'S ~a , ~ ~ /,o T N -siatc u R-9
-
UR-3, .5
, R-.5 5 ~ M
UR-3S ~ ~ ;3_75-
5U ~
UR-3.5 F~•
1 UR-22 ~ PUR•22 _ k~ •
`
J ~
ATT'ACHfUtIEhlT B
CONDiTIC}IUS d3F A!'PRO1lAL
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
1, A, 1 APPROVAL FOR ZE-5-98
A 7116 I' DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOKANE COUINM
1. The proposai shall comply with the Industrial Park (I-1) zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property in strict conformance with the site plan presented to
the Hearing Body on September 9, 1998. All aspects of the concept and proposal shall be binding
on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be approved by the Division
Director/designee, shall only be allowed to meet regulation standards and conditions of approval.
Any other modification must be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval.
3. Strict compliance with every condition of approval is required in the development of this site.
Administrative review is authorized, but no administrative deviations are permitted. Any proposed modification must be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval.
4. Approval is required by the Division Director/designce of a specific lighting and signing plan for
the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the
Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee
for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained
so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. '
6. The Division of Building & Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a
Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice
of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be
recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or
in part, by the Division of Building & Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as
follows:
The parcel of property legally described as the North 53 113 rods of the NW '/a of the NW 1/4
OF Section 10, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM in the County of Spokane, State of
Washington. EXCEPT the East 330.00 of said NW '/4 of the NW '/4; AND EXCEPT County
Road right of way; AND EXCEPT the South 26 2/3 rods of the West 30 rod of said NW 1/4 of
the NW '/4. TOGETHER with the North 300.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of the East 330.00
feet of the W'/Z of the NW '/4 of said section is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane
County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on September 9, 1998, imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. ZE-5-98 is available for inspection and copying in
the Spokane Counfy Division of Building & Planning.
, ATTA►~'.HMENT ~.'i
AGENCY i4ND PUE3LIC CflMN1ENTS
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
, 1025 WBroadway Ave, Spakane, WA 992G0-0170 (509] 456-3GOp Fax 324-3478
,•ENL3INEER' S CONDITIONS OF APPRC?VAL" 2QNE
TO: Spokane Couzity Planning Departmen
FROMa Di~P1SiQT1 of EI1g1T1eer1T1g Sc R.C]aC~s , i~~.
.
DA'TE : SEPteItlb2T 1, 1995 ,
PR0J~CT: LTR-3.5 & RR-10 T'D J-~ BUSINESS CTR
FILE #a ZE-0005-98 /
Hearing: 09/09/1998 @ 10:30 # Review Date: @ #
SPonsor f~:pplicant: PATTI IDLOF-- RAMN[ ASSOC {MILLER} -
SectiQn Township Range: 10-2SY44 -
Planner : joHN PEDERSOIV
'I'echnical Review Date: (06/25 f 1998 @ 1 : 1S)
The Spokane County Engineer-Ing Department has reviewed the- above referenced
- aPplication. The fallow~~g "Canditions of Approval" are subrnitted to the
Spokane County Plarming Department for inclusion in the "Findings o~ Fact,
Conclusioans and ~rderfDecision'p should the request be ap~~oved.
Prior to issuance vf abuiidinc~ permit or at the request o~ the Co~.n~t~~
Engineer in conjunctian with a County Road Project/Road -Improv~~~nz,
District, whichever cor~es. ,~irSt:
1. Applicant shall dedicate 7feet on ~~clid Avenue and the appiicablle
radius on Euclid Avp-nue and P? nes Road. The a~~lican -L shall aran t
~
applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Richt oz Way
per Spokane County - Standards . -
4 '
2. Access perrnits for appraaches to the Caunty Ftoad Sys~en sh~.1 ~ bl-
obtained f rom the County Engineenr .
3. Pines Road is -the jurisdiction af the Wasnington State Depar-umen-L o!
firanspvrtation. Any required access permits or improvements to Pines
Road must be approveci by the Washingt.cn State Dco a rtment 0=
Transport~ti-ofl.
4 . Applic-ant sha? ? submit for ap~~ovai by the Spokane Co,;n~.tit
road, cirainage and access plans. .
CC : Applzcant P;;Li i i IDLO°- P.AMM ASSOC (,±IL'L-yR) ,
Engir.ee*-fSu:7veyar P=-:RiCi{ hxn~~c
P1anre?' 43Q~: PuD~: SD`f
: a
5
Page 2
091091199s Ds/25l199a F
ZE-6d05-9B .
5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submittea an.d
aPpxoved by the Spokane Caunty Engineer. The design, location ana
(arrangement of parking sta11s shall be in accordance with standard
enaineering practices. Paving or surfacing as appraved hy the County
Engineer wi1l be xequired far an y portian of the praject which } s ~o
be occupied or traveled by vehicles .
6, The c~n~3truction of the roadway a.mprovements 5'tated herein shall be
accomPlished as ~~proved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designai~ed a 3Lane Fliriar Arter3al ~~a d way
Section for the improvement of Euclid Avenue which is adjacent ta the
propased develapment. This will require the installatic)n of asphalt
along the farantage af the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also
be constructed.
8. All requixed improvements sha? l conform to the Current State o-ir
Washington Standard Specifications for Raad and Bridge-- construct ion -
and ather applicable caunt~ s"Eandards and/or adopted resolutions
pertainzng to Road Standa.rds and Stormwater Man(igement in ef fec~. a t.
the date of const-,-u-tion, unless atherwise app-roved bythe-°Countv
-
Engineer, .
9. Roadway standards, typical road+aay sections and c?~~i-nage plan
. requirements are found in Spvkane Board df Cnunty Comnissioners
resolutian 95-04 98 as am.,ended and are applicable ta this proposai _
l0. No constr-uctian work } s tc), be performed within the existina oY
proposed right af way until apermit has been issued by the Countv
Engineer_ Al1 work within the public road right of way is subjec-L to
inspect ivn and approval by the County Engineer.
11. A12- required constructian within t1ie existing or proposed public right
of waY is to be completed prior to the release of a builcing perm} t or
aband in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to caver the cos t
of constructian ar irnpravements shali be fi-leci the Countv
Engi-neer. +
. •
• j
.
Page 3 09/09/1998 06/25/1998
2E-0005-98
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities ei-ther
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
13. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval found in
SP-1188-98.
Note: If a Road Improvement District is formed for Euclid Avenue,
County Engineering #7 would be fulfilled. Note: A Mitigated Determination of Non-significance has been issued
for this proposal. The applicant has entered into an agreement with
the Washington State Department o-f Transportation for improvements on
Pines Road which include, but are not limited to, the installation of
a traffic signal and turning lanes. -
~ ' •
RECEIVED
To: JOHN PEDERSON (Building & Planning) SPOKAME COUNTY
cc: AUG 2 5 1998-
From: JIIVI RED (Utilities) DIVISIQN OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
OsY:
Date: 8/24/98
Subject: ZE-0005-98 Stage: Hearing Examiner Phase: offices/light ind. research &
development
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer
connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated
water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees.
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressty to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover", .
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connecfions and facilities for review and approvaf. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal.
SS12F Sewer'plans acceptabie to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer construction permit. - -
SS13A Security shall be deposited with the Division of Utilities for the construction of the public sewer
connection and facilities and for the prescribed warranty period. Security shall be in a form
acceptable to the Division of Utilities and in accordance with the Spokane County Sanitary Sewer
Ordinance.
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordar;ce with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
. .
,
SPOKANE COUNTY NEALTN DISTRICT
CONDITIONS
a. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the llirector of Utilities, Spokane County.
b. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
d. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each building.
e. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. .
.
Washington State Eastern Region
AP Department of T~ransportation 2714 N. Mayfair Street
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000
RECEIVED
August 17, 1998 SPOKANE COUNTY
AUG 19 1998
Mr. John Pederson
Spokane County Planning DiV1S10N OF BUILDING A1dD PLANNING
West 1026 Broadway Avenue Bv:
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re: ZE-5-98 (Divcon Rezone)
Dear Mr. Pederson:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has reviewed and concurs
- with the traffic mitigation outlined in the July 10, 1998 letter from Mr. Todd Whipple of .
Inland.-Pacific Engineering, for the above development. As a result, we ask that the -
following mitigating measures be applied to this development through Spokane County's
SEPA process and as conditions of approval on this rezone: ,
1. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to WSDOT standards a left tum lane along
with all other needed components (illumination, sidewalk replacement, etc.) on Pines
Road to serve Euclid Avenue both Westbound and Eastbound. This left turn Iane shall be constructed as part of the first phase of this development to allow safe and efficient
access to and from Euclid for this development. Prior to the release of building
permits for this development the applicant shall enter into a WSDOT developers agreement for this improvement and prepare an intersection plan for WSDOT
approval. The applicant is also aware that the construction of this left turn lane
requires that he obtain additional right of way which is controlled by others.
2. In order to adequately accommodate drainage as a result of the wideninc, for the left
turn lane the applicant shall grant WSDOT a permanent drainage easement on this site.
This easement area shall be of sufficient size to treat the stormwater per Spokane
County standards and be accessible by truck for maintenance. These drainage plans
will need to be reviewed and approved by WSDOT prior to construction of these
drainaje facilities.
3. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to WSDOT standards a traffic signal at the
Pines Road and Euclid Avenue intersection. This traffic sijnal shall be installed when
signal warrants are met and when traffic volumes necessitate its installation. Prior to
release of building permits for this development the appiicant shall provide a surety
bond to WSDOT in an amount acceptable to WSDOT for the installation of this
sicrnal.
In addition to the above, we ask that the followina conditions of approval be applied to
this development:
. • i. '
- - t
Mr. Pederson
August 17, 1998 . Page 2 .
1. The applicant shall construct sidewalk along the proper[y frontage adjacent to Pines
Road and re-construct the sidewalk were it is removed as a result of the left turn lane.
2. As a result of the left turn channelization, the one proposed direct access to Pines Road
will 'be for right turns in and out only, no lefis will be allowed.
3. The proposed private access to Pines requires that the applicant obtain a WSDOT
Road Approach Permit for the intended site use.
. With the above mitigation and conditions of approval WSDOT has no objections to this
development moving forward.
' If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me at 324-6199.
Sincerely,
~2 o
. ~
Greg Figg
Transportation Planner
GF:
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Cathy Ramm, Ramm and Associates
Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering
Chris Damitio, WSDOT
.
i
( Washington State REVEEW BOIJNDARY 8~ARD
I For Spokane County I
I 721 N. Jefferson St., Rm. 401 ( Spokane, WA 99260-0040 ~ (509) 456-4237 FAX (509) 456-3631
August 18, 1998
Mr. John Pederson, Senior Planner
Division of Building & Planning 1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
RE ZE-9-98 Dear Mr. Pederson:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed zone reclassification for Bryan Stone.
The siie is bcated outside the corporate limits of the Irvin Water District. Annexat~on of the
site into the corporate limits of Irvin Water Districi would require the filing a Notice of
Intention and approval by the Boundary Review Board.
If annexation is anticipated please include the Supplemental Sheet for Non Project Actions along
with the Environmental Chec~clist and list the Boundary Review Board as a permitting agency
under section A.10 of the Environmental Chedclist. Also, the Checklist and Supplemental Sheet
should discuss annexation into the Irvin Water District. ' Please call me at 456-4237 if you have any quesians. Thank you.
Sly,
Thomas Veljic, AlC .
Planner
cc Bryan Stone, Qualchan Investments
Glenn Talmage, Irvin Water District -
$OARD MEN1BERS: ~1arv Renham Rohcrt E. Nchergall Sall}r R. ltcynolds Lawrence B. Stone Annemarie Wiser
07/14~98 TLjE 14 : 29 FA-1 509 892 4125 SPOR.AtiFE VALLEY FIRE DEPT 444 BUILDIhG CODES Q002
t .
/ SPOKANE VALI.EY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Spokane County Fire Dlstrlct l
10314 EAST SPRRGUE AVF, • SPOKANE. WA 44206-3676 •(509) 929-1700 • FAX (5Qq) 892-4125 -
R. Fat Humphrtes
Chw
July 14, 2998
John Pederson
Department of Building ~ Planning
1026 w. Broadway -
. Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Zone Reclassification
Pinecroft Business Center
Dear Mr. Pederson: "
The Spokane valley Fire Department has no objection to this Zone
Reclassification_ we will however have access problems with this -
. submitted site pI'an. We can address.this concern at pre-
construction.
Sincer ly,
~
evin M.
ler
Fire Inspector KM/md '
. , . .
' • .
Pederson, John From: Kevin Robinette[SMTP:ROBINKWR@dfw.wa.govJ
Sent: Monday, August 17, 1998 10:18 AM
To: Pederson, John
Subject: Pinecroft Business Center Rezone (ZE-5-98)
WDFW has reviewed this site plan for a rezQne from UR-3.5 (Urban Residential) and RR-10 (Rural Residential) to
I-1 (Industrial Park) generalfy located at the Southeast corner of Pines and Euclid and offers the following
comment.
Because of the existing and surrounding landuse, we would not request that the County require a Habitat
Management Plan. However, pockets of urban natural open space are becoming increasingly isolated and
function as habitat for many urban wildlife species. We would request that the applicant voluntariiy landscape with
native plant species in a manner which would provide some habitat for wildlife. Information on landscaping for
wildlife is available at our otfice (456-4082) and at the Spokane County Conservation District (353-2120).
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments,
do not hesitate to contact me.
Kevin Robinette
Habitat Biologist _
_ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
8702 N. Division St. '
Spokane, Wash. 99218
(509) 625-5545 "
" robinkwr@dfw.wa.gov .
Page 1
7e - 5' Ci
Y
,
--4
~
.
!I ~
~
JI
• . '
L)
~ 4 u 1998
3~~ 1 1
SPOKANE CQUNTY ENGJNEEA
S P O K A N E O U N T Y
DUILDiNG AND PlANN1NG • A DiVi51ON QF TNE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMt'
• . . , - r,-.. , .,T- .
E110 IlA til)t
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper, 5and~ Kirjib,ffl
Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemrri Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda S i;
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderb%
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning; Jet'i E~:.
Spokane County Air Pollution Contro) Authority
Spokane County Division of Long Range Plannmg; John Merc;
- Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair. ~teve
Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Milc,
Fire District No. 1
_ East Valley School District No. 361
Irvin Water District No. 6
Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fuesior;
WA State Boundary Review Board; Susan 1k:nciicil
WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
WA State Department of Ecology (Olympial
FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner
UATE: August 20, 1998
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing af September 9, 1998, timc
ZE-5-98
Description: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (Llh-~.~~
Residential- ] 0(RR- 10) to Industrial Park ! I- l) on approximatelv ] 5 acres for tho~,-
uses allowed in the Industrial Park (1-1) 1one:.
10-25-44
1 un:her 1'ard Ii:~~;tni~•nt~;. [ ; C. _Iohri Niillt:r
Note that the:l~~~~i~~~iiilili,
agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by August 28, 1993. "400*'
kc
Attachments: Notice of Public Ilearing; SEPA Determination, SEPA Checklist (signed)
102b W-:_~T ~K(~;1O'.'.';11 A1'f NI.`E • W:\5f}I\L;TON 992b1)
( 5(10)4_%-3675 • FAx: (509) -1564703
TUU: (509) 324-3166
1
q
- - ~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
~F
July 6, 1998
s,~ /i
W.O. No. 98425
k~,`, 0)
F~
Spokane County Public Works 7)"
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Attn: Steve Stairs / Pat Harper
Re: Divcon, Pines and Euclid - Traffic Distribution
Dear Steve:
I am in receipt of your memorandum dated June 30, 1998 and understwid your question
regarding the access to Mirabeau Point Drive and the difference between the number of
distributed trips between our two submittals. While, I believe that there will be trips
from this site using Mirabeau Point Drive for access to and from this facility, I do not
believe that when using a time based system there will be a significant advantage to using,
Mirabeau Point Drive to access either Evergreen Road or Sullivan Road when traveling
southbound from the proposed project. To the contrary, I believe that Pines Road will
provide a far superior and shorter (time and distance) trip than anything that Mirabeau
Point will have to offer the commuting public. This is especially true and apparent when
dealing with the "work to home based" type of trip. Based on this I can state that I
strongly believe, that if the commuters are intent on going strictly from work to home and
their destination is either I-90 or those residential areas south of I-90 they in fact will use
Pines, especially if there is a si,gnal present at Pines and Euclid.
I believe that if you review all of the traf~ic information gathered in the area, you will
find that at full build-out of this area, we are projecting that Pines, with some revisions,
will have nearly the s:mc LOS as those intersectior.s l"-}•ing along Evergreen Road.
Therefore, based on time, the Mirabeau Point Drive to Indiana Avenue to Evergreen
Road route will not only be longer than the Pines Road route, it will also have more
signalized intersections to pass through and more turning movements than the direct
route using Pines Road.
Now as I stated earlier, while I do believe that trips from this site will use Mirabeau Point
Drive as an access route, I do not believe that these will be "work to home-based" type
trips, instead they will be "work to other (retail)" type trips with the final leg of the trip
being an "other (retail) to home-base" type trip. Therefore, I will stand by the revised
distribution away from Mirabeau Point Drive to Pines Road, unless, the traffic study
707 1Neq 7111 • Suile 2()() 211~0 LakewcxxJ Onve • Suite ?OS
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, IU 83814
509-4;H-G840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 9 FAX: 208-769-7277
- ,
Spokane County
July 6, 1998
, Pag~ I
CTltel'ld 15 llllLlldell LO dL11 W1Lil tI'1P5 UU1eI' Lllall ~~~Wfk lU tlUlllt;-ba~l; . AdUiuoilail\ . ~
assume that any trips using Mirabeau Point Drive from this site that are in the "work to
other" trip type category, should already be included in other area project traffic studies
as either new trips, which technically they are from this description, or diverted, but I
will object to them being classified as pass-by as that would ulfer a trip with this as it's
primary route.
Per your request, I believe that our revised trip distribution of 6/26/98 should be used as
the trip distribution of choice for the "work to home-based" type firips and have provided
my seal below to validate this letter as my professional opinion and to justify it's use in
the Divcon, Inc. traffic study..
I
Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call.
S incerely,
Inl Pacific 'neering Co.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E. 25461
President
~Ip~Ypy
TRW/tw EXPIRES 9/24/ ~
cc: John Miller, Divcon, Inc.
file
. , ,
.
~ •
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
..+L,, N 10. 1 -0
W.O. No. 98425
Spokane County Public VVorks
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Attn: Pat Harper
,.C: Divcon - Pines and Euclid
'I'raffic Impact Summarv and Proposed Mitigation
[)em.
As you are aware Inlaiid Paciiic Eiigiileeruig, lilc.(IPL) lias been prepariiig iinpact traftic studies
fior various projects in the Pines Road corridor beiween Trent and Mission Avenue since 1994.
A t the present time, we have just submitted the TIA for the Mirabeau Point Final Environunenta I
[iiZpact Statement (adopted by reference for SEPA purposes) to you and are about to submit the
Lawson/Gunning TIA in the near future. Based upon all of the traffic data performed by IPI-:
within the corridor and the trip generation for the proposed project listed below, we wotild like tc)
pl•ovide a proposal for mitigation of traffic impacts that would be included in a Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) for the above referenced project.
Table 1- Tri Generation Rates for the Pro oscd Divcon Pro'ect
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Size in
KSF Rate and Total Directional Rate And Total llirectional
Volume Distribution Volume Distribution
$8% in 12% out 17% in T83% out
Genera! Office Builditrg - I TE Land Use Code 710
60 I.56/}+sf = 94 trips 82 11 1.49/ksf = 89 trips 15 74
Busirress Park - ITE Land Use Code 774
108.4 I.43/ksf = 155 tris 136 19 1.29/ksf = 140 tri s 24 116
Totals
,
168.4 218 30 39 190
Averagc Daily Trips (ADT)
Units Rate Total ADT
168.4 ksf 11.0 i(same for both ) 1854 -0' West 7th • Surte 200 2020 Lakewoai Drive • Suite 205
Spokanr, WA 99Z04 Coeur d'Aiene, ID 83814
;011-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-727?
.
.
.
~ Based upon the project as currently proposed, the full project at build out should be expected to
generate approximately 229 PM Peak Hour trips. With all of the mitigation proposed througliout
this corridor for the various projects from the Spokane Valley Mall, the Mirabeau Point project
and the Lawson/Gunning project just being completed as well as the Spokane County Mirabeau
Point Drive County Road Project the changes within the Pines Road corridor will be substantial.
Therefore, based upon all of this information we would like to propose the following as proposed
mitigation for the development of this proposed project.
1. That this project in addition to providing frontage improvements provide the design and
construction of a new left turn lane on Pines Road at Euclid Avenue. We would propose
that this lane be constructed with the first phase to allow safe and efficient access to and
from Euclid for this project. We would also propose that this project be allowed to widen
Pines to the east and not be required to widen it symmetrically down the middle to reduce
the potential total cost.
2. That when warranted this proposed project be responsible for providing a traffic signal at
the Pines and Euclid intersection. In lieu of actual construction and to meet the
requirements of the WSDOT we would propose that a bond be provided to insure future
design and construction of this signal.
Based upon our knowledge of the Pines Road corridor, we feel that the mitigation being
proposed on behalf of the applicant is equal to or greater than other area wide mitigatory
measures currently being proposed. Additionally, we also would like the County to accept this
proposed mitigation as full mitigation for the entire proposed project, thereby excluding any
phased development of the site from participation in any transportation planning fee area. This
exclusion is expected to be included in the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
(MDNS) statement provided by Spokane County.
If you find that this proposal is acceptable to Spokane County and the WSDOT, the Sponsor of
this project will enter into a MDNS agreement with Spokane County, prior to the hearing.
Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Inland acific En ' eering Co. ~ R• ~~1~
WASy~~
~
• < ~ y~° ` o
,
.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
President ~ 25462
TRW/tw
: EXPIRE S 9/24/ 40
cc: John 1VEller, Divcon, Inc.
file
JUL-10-199P 16:39 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01
r y
IMLAND P~~IFIC ENGINFERING
707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Spo~ane, WA 99204
Telephone: (509) 458-6840 FAX: {509} 458-6844
FAX TRAIVSMITTAL
00 1qO. OF PAGES: ~ (anclardu:g coverpage)
I]A']C]E. SWI! ----TO: . F'AXN; , _ .
CDA+iPANY. FHDNE-9:
F1tOMt ~ JOB -
~ #
_ 9PNob
PRar~~TNArrrE:
owmrrA[.. I.+r MAIL: Cl Nv
NOTES;
[):1~ORl~ S 1F A~t5 ~.iaT, YV Q~
REV. 5197
JLL-10" 1998 16' 39
~
ENGINEERING, INC.
INI.AND PACIF4C
July 10,1998
W.O. r1o. g8425
SPokane County public yVorks
w.102b BrOadwa
gpokane'j WA 99260
Amn; Pat HarP'ff
1)ivcon • p'ines and Euclid nd Proposed M~ngarion
rraffic Impact Su~a~ s
-
Dear Pat: ~,g impact traffic stuidits
n g 1p~ ha,s becn pTePv~~ ~ince 1494.
Pacific Eg~ccrin ~ Trcnt and M' Ssion A m~tal
As you are awaro ~d ~es Roa~d corridor betwc~' ~
' th~ p foI the Mitab ou ~u and P° arintc Fina1 Envuo
fox v~o~ proj~5 ~ t submi~~ te about to submit the
ent tvmes ~~`Ve • or SEPA p~Poses) to y
t tht P~ fcr~nce f e trai~i~ data perform we would likc A' ~ ~y to
n
~pact Statc~n~t ( inadoptcd th~c bY ne~ Based upon a11 of th o ed pxoj~t listcd below,
La~n/Gv~ninB ~ ~~~~on fot tba PI ~~d be includ~ ~ a Mitigated
witk►ia t~i~ c°m~ ~e pon af traf'.c impacts that wa ~ oct.
sa1 foac ~n~ for thc abovc refctence~ P~
PjO~~ a p~ fNon-5ignificaac~ C~~S}
insti
~ ro osed Divcon Pro ect
` , ~tton Rstes for th~ p, ~t~►~-
Table i T~
• ~%7it- Jy.,'~~~. .'~r~~~.~. ` ' ~if~ t ~y ~ ~1~~~Vi1~~i .
_ . R + r r~ . ~ ~ i ~ 1g fd~ ~ J~1►t~,•.
, ~ ~ ~ II~~ , ~ a , "~T~~w
to~
~ ~ttit ' ~ j,s`trxbu~an 7; . , , _ .„p , .~g-~~p,ont
, . . . :
. ;
. , .
. .
. . N~
t
: ~ r1 , _y~a •~,~A~~ f112~~, ° ~ : «c... , ~
~Q.•~{A' ,--1
710
I T E Land uSe ~od~
1
GenerQl Offu~ Buitdrng 9 ni s 5 74
- 4giksf 8 p
tl
1 ~36t~sf = 94 uips 82 Code 770
~
_ E Land ~se
$wsiness PQrk ~ z~ 1 tb
1.29~csf ~ 140 ~
- 136 ig
108.4 1.43~' 15S
Toials
39 140
.
30 . -ua
r ~
~
218
t
-..~.~.yw~i
1b8~ ~ ~ ; , . . .
.4 ~,k
J~~12 Ml ` 'f~ ~ ~~,~.R'~ ~ ~-T_~• i . ' . - ~ . ^ ~ . . .
.:1~:~'Y~~ tl1Y ~ ' ~ •N ..i J ~ 1 1" 4r11'. . . _
. . ~ 1 . . . ' . 1 r
r.it~ • ~ ~i..N . . L . + ~ f . _ ~ ~.1 . a~
. .a~ i ♦ 7j~ .1' t . . _ ..A"~'" .
1» r Y . «M T . . • ~ IQ 5A
ti: V ~ ~•1 w+~ ~ . 7 ~ /~}~r~K ..a7S V ~M
: " •c S i..l S: i ~ ~uy~i'~~o-..t~{i'•° . °
~i+
•':Ff h' i[\'SN' I'~1~.~~71~ Q~ • .1~w.1~~= .0 1 SM{,~~e for bo
11.0 ~
•
168.4 ksf
• S„itc 205
7m 7t+ . s~,"* 200 ~u7a ~~~ew~od a~ ~ ~3~14
W~w
cnel.int, WI► 992Q4 Coeur d,~"''
20&765-7764 • FAl(: 208-769•7277
JUL-10-1998 16:40 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.03
gased upen the project as currently proposed, the full project at build out should be expected to
generate approximately 229 PM Peak Hour trips. With all of the mitigation proposed throughout
this comidor for the various projects from the Spokane Valley Mall, the Mirabeau Foint pmject
and thc Lawson/Ciunning project just being completed as well as the Spokane Couaty Muabeau
Point Drive Couaity Road Project the changes within the Pines Road eorridor will be substantial.
'Iherefore, based upon alI of this information we would like to propose the followuig as proposed
mitigation for the developrlaent of this proposed project.
1. That this project in addition to providing frontage i.mprovernents provide the design and
constructioa of a new left ttun lane on Pirles Road at Euclid Avcaue. We would propose
that this lane be constructed with the fir§t phase to allow safe and cfficient access to and
frorn Euclid for this project We would also propose tbat tus project be allowed to vviden
Pines to the east and not bc required to widen it symmetrically down the middle to reduce
the potential total cost.
2, 1'hat when warranted this proposed project be aesponsible for providing a trsffic signal at
the Fines and Euclid intersection. La lieu of actual construction and to me,et the
requiremerats of the WSDOT we would propose that a bond be provided to iresure futtiue
design and construction of this signal.
Based upon our knowledge of the Pines Road corridor, we feel that the mitigation being
proposed on behalf of the applicant is equal to or greater thaa other area wide mitiga$ory
measure5 currently being praposed. Additionally, we also would iike the County to accept this
proposed mirigation as full mitigation for the entire proposed project, thereby excluding any
phased development of the site from participation iri any transpurtation planning fee area. 1lis
exclusion is expccted to be included in the Iv.[itigatgd Deterniination of Non-Significance
(NONS) statement provided by Spokar►e County.
If you find that this proposal is acceprtable to Spokane County and the WSDOT, the Sponsor of
this project will enter into a MDNS agreement with Spokane County, prior to the heari.ng.
Should you have aay questions or coamerrts please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Inland acific En ' eering Co. ~
0
.
Todd It. Wbipple, P.E. r0 ~
~aPresident ~ ~
~ TRW/tw
~ EXPIRES 9/24/
cc o John Miller, Divcon, Inc.
f 1e
TI"1Tr11 P'1 1']7
,TUL-10-1998 08: 53 I hUAND PAC I F I C ENG P. 01
. ,
FOIO . ' .
• 4d~tl I
~
Vv.O. No. 98425 post-~r N°P4°
Juty 9, I99►8 7~, !1;0
Spokane County Public V~orks W. 1026 Broedway Spokan~e, WA 99260 l~,,, _
.
Atta: Pat Hatper
R,c: Divcon - P'fnes and Euclid
Traffic Impact Summary and Pca►posed Ntig9tion
Dear Pat:
As you are aware Inlaad Pacific Engineerins, Inc.(IPE) has been preparing impa,ct traffic studies
for various pFmjecta in the Piaa Road conidor betwcen Trent and Missson Avenue since 1994.
At the present timc we have j ust submitted thc Muabeau Point 7ZA to you snd am abo
submit the Lawson/Crtmnin8 TIA in the near futurc. Bascd upon all of the traffic data pcrformed
b,y IpE within thc corridnr aad the trip gcncration for the proposed projcct listed below, we
would lilUe to provide a proposal for mitigation of uaffic impacts that would be included ui a
Nfingated Dk;Cetmination of Non-Significance (MDNS) for the above refcrcnced pro}ect.
Table 1 - Tri Generatioo Rates for the Pro osed Divcon Pro ect
p,•.. a:.. tl.l i af~r t{ f~~ Irsi~~
y~ ~1i+ 1r:~ti.,~~j~Y~~ y
I h• ~ , , ~1 . 1 . Mr. .
~ ..R~ . ~ . A-° i r 4 ; M✓. i ~ . s r f . 4.~~~
e 1r' ri 11 1 - Y]~ N 1 7 /w 4u ~yl ~ w
i ^
. , . a ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ y ~~7~8i.Ra~q~14*`~'~y ~c" . . . ~ ,'i
'"t
`"~sV~~~a" t~,•,'~~~t7[~~-~;i~~ , M : ,~~~',~C~t ,r K { . ~ ~ ~ ~ . : . . _
,
~n44A7~w+i5• yt*... ~ , . , .
~S ~(~j~ ~,yy
• ,rt t' 1 I + ~+M' M ♦ ' ~ ~j~l ibq~as Vil a...-r~ r ' . .
~~iWwrt~'~
t
~r,f Y'~ ~i..4jk _ ~ T ~•►rM'~ Q,.p ~lb~ ~
~YJY dl~ LM',' ~.Ow p-.Q~.
i i , ~ ~ _ » ~ • rir
General Off ce Buitding -ITE Land Use Code 710
60 1.56/ksf = 44 triPs 82 11 . 1.4911csf - 89 trip: 15 74
Business park . ITE Latrd Use Code 770
108.4 1.43Aksf=155 Qi 136 19 1.29lksf~ l40 ' s 24 llb
Totall ,
39 190
168.4 218 30
. .h ira j~ - i*_ Mi~ ~R~ Y~Njr
c~ s
.,1
~N ,Iri. 1
r.~.~
a~~. dw.•?4n~~~ -n* ~r.~~~•f.`~r''ii~til~~/ F+T,'~~ ~ ~.t `7.~J ~i
t i J ~•#.r v y ~.,1 ~i~ 1 ~ ~ ♦~-..n ~.i~ 1.1
r~
l1. ,.~.'T M1- 7t~ n~~~j1f~~~#c• 'S'~`I ~ i ~ f 4 ii. ~ ~ .«~r,• . .1 . 'r~
..5~ r~~ ''~J 7. ~rsi i3.~. ~ 4 u~ L ~ f -y ~'4 1. ,M _ ~ • ~ - .r~.a. f-uw ~ R ~ l,r~,~~ ~ ~ ~jx . ~ ~ ~ .~w ~ ~'4~~t
~ ~
`'+r'."~•N{A'l~r.:'rJ ~A~-~
'Y ~.~I':~.'~i~ },/1 '~r1~lC~ `-~'i4 ~•"~~r i ~J~7' ♦ s. .~~1~. ~1I ~ ~~~{~wf frr.h~~t~~~.i►~~-_~'t--.'Alin !i ~ . 1
~
.y~ I~~},r ~'k~;~s" 1~ . ni r '~y f r :.a ' -
168.4 ksf 11.01 samt for both 1854
JL1L-10-1998 08:54 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02
~ s
Based upan the pmject as currerrtly proposed, the fiill project at build out should be expected to
gengrate approxirnately 229 Pivi Peak Hour trips. With all of the mitigation pToposed throug,hout
this ccnridor for the various projects from the Spokane Valley Mall, the Mirabeau Point projeet
aad the i.awson/Grtulning pTOject just beialg completed as well as the Spokane County Niirabeau
Point Drivc County Road Project the changes within the Pines Road corridor wi11 be subs#antial.
Therefore, based upon all of this inforaiation we vvould like to pxopose the following as proposed
ffiitigation for the development of this proposed project.
1. Tliat this project in addition to providing frontsge imgrovements provide the design and
constnlction of a new left tutn laae on Fines Road at Euclid Avenue. We wouEd propose
th.at this Iane be canstructed with the first phase to allow safe and efficient access to and
from Euclid for this project. We would also propose that this project be allowed to widen
Pines to the east and not be required to widen it symnaetrically down the Eniddle to Yeducc
the potential total cost.
2. That when warranted this propvsed project be responsible for providing a traff'ic sigaal at
ghe Pines and Euclid intersection. Ire Iieu of actual constria.ction and ta meet the
requirements of the WSDOT we would propose that a hond be provided to insure future
desiga and construction of this signal.
Based upon our lnowiedge of the Pines Road corridor, we feel that the mitigation being
proposed on behalf of the applicant is equal to or greater than other area wide mitigatory
,
measures cunently being proposed. Additionally, we also would like the County to accept this
proposed mitigation as full mitigatioa for the entire proposed pToject, thereby excluding any
phased development of the site from participation in any transpotRation planning fee area. Thas
exclusion is expected to be incliaded In the Mitigated Deternunation of Non-Signif cance
(MDNS) stateanent provided by Spokane County.
If you find that this proposal is acceptable to Sgokane County and the WSDOT, the Sgonsor of
this project will enter into s NDNS agreement with Spokane Couaty, prior to the hearing.
Should you have aay questioas ar comments please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
President
TRWltw
cc: John Miller, I?ivcon, Inc.
file
• /
.1
l •
d
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVZONE
TO: Spokane County Planning Departmen
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads C~
DATE: September 1, 1998
PROJECT: UR-3.5 & RR-10 TO I-1 BUSINESS CTR
FILE ZE-0005-98 /
Hearing: 09/09/1998 Q 10:30 #
Review Date: @ #
Sponsor/Applicant: PATTI IDLOF- R.AMM ASSOC (MILLER)
Section Township Range: 10-25-44
Planner: JOHN PEDERSON
Technical Review Date: (06/25/1998 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County
Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement
District, whichever comes first:
1. Applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on Euclid Avenue and the applicable
radius on Euclid Avenue and Pines Road. The applicant shall grant
applicable border Pasements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way
per Spokane County Standards.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
3. Pines Road is the jurisdiction of the Washington State Department of
Transportation. Any required access permits or improvements to Pines
Road must be approved by the Washington State Department of
Transportation.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
CC Applicant PATTI IDLOF- R.ANIIM ASSOC (MILLER)
Engineer/Surveyor PATRICK MOQRE
Planner JOHN PEDERSON
~age 2 `
09/09/1998 06/25/1998
f ZE-0005-98
5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designated a 3 Lane Minor Arterial Roadway
Section for the improvement of Euclid Avenue which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the installation of asphalt
along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also
be constructed.
8. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
11. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
Page 3 R
, 09/09/1998 06l25l1996
~ zE-ooas-96
12. The applicant should be advised that there rnay exist utilities either
undergraund or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financia1 obligation for adjustments or
re14Cat1bt1 regardinq these utilities. The applicant shauld check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to deterrr«ne
whether the applieant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
13. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval found in
SP-1188-98.
Note: If a Road -1lnprovement District is formed for Euclid Avenue,
County Engineering #7 would be fulfill.ed.
Note. A Mitigated Deterrnination of Non-significance has been issued
for this proposal. The applicant has entered into am agreement with
the Washington State Departrnent of Transportation for improvements on
Pines Road which include, but are not limited to, the instaliation af
a traf f ic signal and turning lanes,
• • a County
Public •
D • •
• • a •
R• a•
Memo
To: John Pederson, Senior Planner, Division of Building and Planning
From: Pat Harper, Transportabon Engineenng and RID Supervisor
CC: Divcon project file
Date: J u ly 9, 1998
Re: Technical Complete Status for DIVCON rezone and Euclid and Pines
Spokane County Transportation Engineenng Section finds that the Divcon proposal is Technically
Complete provided that the applicant agrees to an MDNS for off-site road improvements based upon
impacts from this proposed development as demonstrated by the applicants engineer. Addibonally, the
Mirabeau Point Final Environmental Impact Statement is adopted by reference relating 4U ±raffic
impacts
Also please see the attached letter from Todd Whipple discussing this matter.
0 Page 1
r ' •
~
:
,
~~5
S P O K A N E C O U N T
BUILDTNG AND PLANNWG • r1 Ufti'ISIUN OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAKThiFM ~~Ea
JAMCS L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECfOR DFtvt~tLs M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRE~~ c F.
JU~ ~ ~ 19~
seoweCOUoQoiEER
NfEMORANDUM
DATE: JUly 9, 1998
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering - Pat Harper c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District - Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair - Sceve Horobiowski
Spokane County Division of Engineering, Devclopment Senices - Bill Fl _
WA State Department of Transportation - Greg Figg
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Stormwater Seccion - Bremi.: Simms
Spokane Regional Transportation Council - Glenn Miles -
Spoka.ne Tra.nsit Authority - Christiae Fueston
WA State Boundary Review Board - Susan Winchell
East Valley School District #f 361
Irvin Water District N 6
Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning - John Mercer
Fire District #1
FROM: John Pederson, Sen.ior Planner r
RE: ZE-5-98 - Rezone Reclassificatio~i from Urban Residentia13.5 and Rural
Residential - 10 to Industrial - 1
On June 16, 1998, the Division of Building and Planni.ng circulated the project application, site
plan and eavironmental checklist for the above referenced project and the technical review
meeting was held on June 25, 1998. Subsequent to the technical review meeting the applicaat
submitted a revised site plan (dated July S, 1998) and copies of the revised site plan are enclosed
ta update your files. If you have any questions about tbe revised plan, please contact me at
477-3675.
C: John Miller, Applicant
Cathy Ramm, Ramm Associates
Enclosure
1()26 WUST BROADWAY AvENUE • SI'OKANF, WASH3\GRIN 99260
I'i io,\,c (509) 456•3675 • Fnx. (509) 4564703
.rnn~ (W))324-3160
l
i • • ~ '
. ~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COYJNTY HEAR.ING EXANIYNER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLYC HEARING WILL BE HELD OiV THE
I,AND USE APPLYCATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No. ZE-5-98, Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) to Industrial Park (I-1) on approximately 15 acres for those uses allowed in the
Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
Hearing Date and Time: September 9, 1998 10:30 a.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Applicant/Owner: Lumber Yard Investments. L.L.C. c/o Joha Miller
Owner's Designated Contact: Ramm Associates, Inc., c/o Patti Idlof, 25 S. Altamont, Spokane, WA.
99202, (509) 534-8086. -
Address and Location: Generally located east of Pines Road (SR-27), and south of Euclid Avenue in
the NW '/4 of S. 102 T. 25 N., R. 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington._
Comprehensive Plan: Urban & Rural.
Zoning Designation• Urban Residential-3.5 (LTR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-10).
Environmental Determination: A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued by
the County Division of Building and Planning, as the lead agency. The official comment period ends 9-
7-98.
Related Permits: None
Division of Building & Planning Staff: John Pederson, (509) 456-3675
HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDI7RES
Hearinb Process and Appeals: The hearing ~vill be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearing will be conducted in facilities which axe physically accessible
to persons with disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
Couniy Division of Building and Planning, 15t Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, bettiveen 8 a.m. and 4 p m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays.
Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or
special needs, please call the Division at (509) 456-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Buildina and Planning, 1026 W. Broadtivay, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: John Pederson, ZE-
5-98. Motions must be made in writing, and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d
Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadtivay, Spokane, ~VA, 99260-0245.
. ' . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
FILE NO(S): ZE-5-98
DESCRIPTION OF PROP4SAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) to Industrial Park (I-1) on approximately 15 acres for those uses allowed in the
Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: September 9, 1998
PROPONENT: Lumber Yard Investments. L.L.C. c/o John Miller, P.O. Box 18708, Spokane, WA. 99208
OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Ramm Associates, Inc., c/o Patti Idlof, 25 S. Altamont, Spokane, WA
99202, (509) 534-8086.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located east of Pines Road (SR-27), and south of Euclid Avenue in
the NW of S. 10, T. 25 N., R. 44 EWM, Spbkane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on
the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist
and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this MDNS; pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (1).
(X) This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); tlie lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this MDNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., September 7, 1998, if they are intended to alter the MDNS.
MITIGATING MEASURES:
1. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to WSDOT standards a left hirn lane along with all other
needed components (illumination, sidewalk replacement, etc.) on Pines Road to serve Euclid Avenue
both Westbound and Eastbound. This left turn lane shall be constructed as part of the first phase of this
development to allow safe and efficient access to and from Euclid for this development. Prior to the
release of building permits for this development the applicant shall enter into a WSDOT developers
agreement for this improvement and prepare an intersection plan for WSDOT approval. The applicant is
also aware that the construction of this left turn lane requires that he obtain additional right of way which
is controlled by others.
2. In order to adequately accommodate drainage as a result of the widening for the left turn lane the
applicant shall grant WSDOT a permanent drainage easement on this site. This easement area shall be of
sufficient size to treat the stormwater per Spokane County standards and be accessible by truck for
maintenance. These drainage plans will need to be reviewed and approved by WSDOT prior to
construction of these drainage facilities.
3. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to WSDOT standards a traffic signal at the Pines Road and
Euclid Avenue intersection. This traffic signal shall be installed when signal warrants are met and when
traffic volumes necessitate its installation. Prior to release of building permits for this development the
applicant shall provide a surety bond to WSDOT in an amount acceptable to WSDOT for the installation
of this signal.
I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications and adjustments to the above described
proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the future.
Date: 7-~'k rint ,ped (1-,- ~
l ~
Signature: ~ . ~ / n
~ ,
Rcsponsible Official: JTM MANSON by John W. Pederson
Position/Title: Senior Planner Phone: (509) 477-3675
~
Address: West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 _
,
Comments regarding environmental concerns are welco at the hearin .
Date Issued• ad Signature:
* ' **##**###**s*t * ~r** * +k****~k***#**M**+k
APPEAL OF T IS DETERMTNATION, r it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County
Division of Building & Planning, West 102 roadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same
as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This
appeal must be written and make specific factual objections. Contact tlie Division of Building & Planning for
assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal.
******~~*****~~r******#***~**~~************************~****
A copy of the MDNS was mailed to:
1. WA. State Department of Ecology 2. Spokane Regional Health District
Sepa Review, Olympia, 98504 Attn: Steve Holderby
MSTR, MDNS '
REV 12/90
, . _ -
MDNS; Fite No. ZE-5-98 • ' Page 2 '
3. Spokane County Division of Utilities. 4. Spokane County Division of Building &
Attn: Jim Red Ptanning
Attn: Jeff Forry
5. Spokane County Division of Engineering 6. Spokane County Fire Protection
Attn: Pat Harper District # I
7. Spokane County Air Pollution Control S. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation &
Authority Fair
Attn: Steve Horobiowski
9. Spokane County Division of Utilities - 10. WA State Boundary Review Board
Stonnwater Attn: Susan Winchell
Attn: Brenda Sims
11. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 12. Spokane Transit Authority
Attn: Glenn Miles Attn: Christine Fueston
13. WA State Department of Transportation 14. East Valley School District No. 361
Attn: Mark Rowher
15. Irvin Water District No. 6 16. Long Range Planning Division
Attn: lohn Mercer
17. Spokane County Division of Engineering -
Development Services Section
Attn: Bill Hemmings
~ I
~
I
,
MS7R; MDI3S
RLV: t 2/9o
,
t
` JKANE ENVIRONIVENTAL ORDINAti
4
WAC 197-11-960 SeCt10i1 11 10,230(1)
Environrnental Checklist File N~ ~r 6--95
Purpose af C'hecklist:
The State Environmental Polic}r Act (SEPA) chagter 43.21 C RCW requires all gavernm~ntal agencies to
considerc the environmerrtal impacts af a groposal before nriaking decisions An Environmental Impact
Stateme,nt {EIS} rnust be grepared for all proposals witk'i prabable srgnificant adverse inpacts on the quality of
the envirorunent. The purgose vf t.his ch~cklist is to provide i_ufarmation to help you and the agency identify
impacts fi-am yaur proposal (and to reduce ar avvid impacts from the prvposal, if it c,an be dane) and to help
the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Inst~ctions for Applfcant.
'Lhis environmental checkLs~ askS you to describe same basic mf'ormation about your proposal. Gavernmont.a1
agencies use #las checklist to deterniine whether the enviTonmental impacts of your praposal are sigxificant,
requirulg preparation af an EI5 Answer the questions briefly, with the mast precise infonmation known, or
give the best descriptivn yau can.
Yvu must answer each question accurate1y and carefu~ly, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be. able to answer the questions &om your ovvn observations or project plans w1#hout the need to hue
experts. If yau rea,liy do not know t,he answer, or if a qctestions does not agpl}~ to your proposal, wnte "do not
lnow" or "Does not apply_" Camplete answers to the questions now may avaid unraecessary delays later. -
Some questions ask about governmental reg+xlations, such as zontng, shoreline, aad landmark designation
Answer these questions Lf you can Ifyou have Rrobiems the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to a11 parts af your proposaY, even if yau plan to do t.hem ouer a period of tme or
on dif#'erent parcels af land. Attach any additional information that wili describe your proposal ar its
environrnental efFects, 'F'he a.gency to u+hich you submit this checklist may ask yau to explain your answers or
gravnde addition,al informaton re.asonab1y related to determining if there ma}r be signifieant adverse irrrpact.
Use of checklistfar nonpraject proposals -
Cvmplete tWs checklist for nonpro~ect prapvsaJs, even though questions may be answered "dves not apply," IN
ADDI'I"ION, comglete the SLTPPLEIviEN'TAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT AC1'I[)A1'S (Part D)-
For nonproject aetions, the references in the checkZist to the words "prOjeCt,s" c`appl1G3I]t,s: alld "property or
site" should be read as "groposal," °`propaser," and "affected geographic area," respectively,
Prrrecraft Busrness Center Environnterrtal Checkltst } 06111198
98-010
M1
i - •
r * ~
JKANE ENVIRON11rEENTAL ORI~INAN. ,
(wAc 197-1 1-96a) section 11.10.230(~)
A. BAc~~~OUNa
1. Nme of proposed project, if applicable,
Pinecroft Business Cencer
2 Name afapplicant:
Lumber Yard 3nvestments, LLC
3. Address aud phone sumber of agplicant or contact person
Applicant: Contact Persnn
Jahn Miller c!o Lumber Yard In~estments, LLC Cathy R.amm, Ramm Associates, Irnc.
PC] Bnx 18708 25 S. A1#amont
Spokane, WA 99208-0708 Spok,arse, WA 99202
(509) 466-8900 (509) 534-8086
4. Date checklist prepared:
June 1998
5 Agency xequestirag checklist
Spokane County Division of Budchng and Plamning
6. Proposed timing or sclhedule (including phasing, if apphicable):
Constn.ictian of firs-t ins#aa1 buildmg is anticipated dunng the fali of 1998 Fii11 build-out ofthe site Co
accur over a5 - 10 year time penod. ~
7 a. Do You have anY Plans, for future additions, expansions, or further activitY relate to orconnWed f/
vviEh this proposal? Lf yes, cxplain. _
Applic,ativn for aShort PXat to establish first parcels for development arzd later agglication for a Bindhng
Site Plan to establish individual parcels for the southem and eastern area of the site.
6. Do yau own or have options on land nearby or adjacent #a #his progosal? If yes, explain.
No.
S List any environmental in.farmation you lrnow abaut that has been prepared, or will be prepared, d1rectly
related to this propasal_
AUvel I Enviro=ental Site Assessmen# has be:n prepared for the praject site ASEPA environmental
checklist for a shnr# piat currently tn process
~f•~~:'~ p
Prnecro~'t Business C"errter Envrrorrmental Check,fisd 2 ~-e''~S41~Il 1I98
98-01 0 }L J
~
• • • , ♦ ~
JKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINAN. ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
9. Do you lmow whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
The 15 acre site is proposed for a Short Plat to enable timely building permit issuance for the first
building. Property adjacent to the east is part of the Mirabeau Point Master Plan An Environmental
Impact Statement has been prepared for this project which includes a Comprehensive Plan arnendment and
zone reclassification. The adjacent property is proposed to be reclassified from Urban to Commercial
and rezoned from Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) to Community Business (B-2). The proposed use for the
adjacent property as identified in the Mirabeau Point Master Plan is for a recreational vehicle park and
business uses. An amendment to the Arterial Road Plan is also included which would reclassify Euclid
Avenue from a local access roadway to a minor arterial.
10. List any govemment approvals or permits ihat will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Environmental threshold determination, site plan approval, and all required permits for water, sewe ,
roads, drainage, and buildings, water plan approval from Irvin Water District. /1 Ge ~
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the p oject
and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certairs aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
-
A rezone from UR-3.5 and RR-10 to Industrial Park (I-1) is requested for the 15 acre project site to
enable development of a business park which would include light industrial and office uses. The
Conceptual Site Plan shows the general location and dimensions of buildings, parking areas, driveways,
roads and landscaping. A more detailed site plan will be submitted rvith each application for a building
permit. There are four large buildings (27,100 SF each) fronting on Euclid Avenue which are provided
access via pnvate driveways and one private road. Two additional buildings (30,000 SF each) are
planned for the southem terrace area with access via a private road extension from Euclid Avenue.
Building on-site will start on the west side and proceed east, with the upper terrace area to be developed
last. The existing house and outbuildings will remain occupied by the current property owner for up to
five years. These buildings will be removed prior to construction in the eastem area of the site
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient uiformation for a person to understaad the precise location of
your proposed project, inctuding a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a
proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available Wlule you should
submit a.ny plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit application related to this checklist.
The project site is located at the southeast corner of Pines Road and Euclid Avenue in the Spokane Valley,
in Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W M
A conceptual site plan which includes a vicinity map is provided with this environmental checklist. ,
13 Does the proposed action Le within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General SeNver Service Area
(GSSAP The Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA)? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA
Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries).
Pinecroft Business Center Errvrronmental Checkhst 3 06111198
98-010
~
JKANE iJNVILLVl 7M+.,/11 1AL OiVJli lANti i
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1) ASA - Yes; GSSA - Yes; F55A, - Yes, City of Spakane - No, ~ Opted ~"he pr oject site is lacated within the Intenrr~ Urba~n Crowtl~ A~rea (IUGA) bo~.t~dary ay Spakane
County on_February 11, 1997.
Pinecroft Busrness Center EnvrrarrrrrerrtaJ Checklf.rt 4 06111198
98-010
r •
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL OkDINAN ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
1. EARTH
a. General descnption of the site (circle one) flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
Mostly flat with a terraced area in the southeastern portion of the site.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approxirriate percent slope)?
The majority of the site is relatively flat (0 to 1% slopes) with steeper
slopes m the southeastern portion of the site (16 to 25% slopes).
c. What general types of soils are found on ihe site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farrriland..
Garrison gravelly, 0 to S% slopes. This soil type is somewhat excessively
drained with finer textured layers of yellowish brown sand. It is
characterized by moderately rapid permeability, slow surface run-off,
slight hazard of erosion, low water holding capacity, and high shear
strength. Imgated GgA soils have been identified as areas of prime
farniland according to the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
1'he agncultural capability unit is IIIs-2.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicuuty? If so, describe.
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any fillmg or
grading proposed Indicate source of fill.
The on-site soils will be disrupted and somewhat displaced during site
preparation activities including initial surface grading, excavating
foundations, utility installation, and final site grading. Adequate
amounts of fill materials are located on-site to balance any grading
during construction.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
Soils will be exposed during construction of the project, thereby increasing the
potential for wind and water erosion dunng construction. This will be a short-
Pinecroft Business Center Errvironmental Checklrst S 06111198
98-010
• .
~ JKANEh ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAI~ ~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
term impact until site surfacing and/or vegetation is established.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ~t~~~,~~'~ ~ f~
t
Approximately 60 to 65 percent of the site will consist of impernous
surfaces including buildings, parking areas, and roadways.
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
~
Site construction of sewer, water, and roads will occur during the
spring, summer, and fall months of the year. Wind erosion can be • l-~'~ L C~
controlled by watering the soil during construction. Construction and
placement of on-site drainage control measures (i.e. berms, ditches,
and culverts) will limit impacts of water erosion, if any, to the site.
2. AIR _
a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industnal, wood smoke) during construction and-
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if lrnown.
There are four potential sources of air pollution dunng the construction
phase of the proposed project: 1) dust from various construction and
earthinoving operations, 2) hydrocarbon evaporation from priming and
paving operations, 3) carbon monoxide from the queuing of vehicular
traffic and related reductions in velucular speeds near the construction
site, and 4) pollutant eirussions from the operation of construction
equipment. Dust is the primary on-site source of air emissions during the
construction phase of the project. It is anticipated that some fugitive dust
emissions will be generated during construction, particularly since most of
the construction activlties will take place during the drier summer months
Proposed light industrial uses are not expected to result in any significant
increase in air emissions over existing conditions.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
No. ~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any-
Plnecroft Business Center Environmental Checklist 6 06111198
98-010
. •
.1KANE E;NVIRONMEI4TAL ('RDINA1V
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
Watering of on-site soils to control dust emissions will occur as necessary
during construction Construction and vehicular emissions are regulated /
V
to reduce impacts; no additional control of exhaust emissions is required. (~C~✓~` `~~`'2~
3. WATER Y2
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands? If yes, descnbe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please descnbe and attach
available plans.
No.
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that wouid be placed
in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the
area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
No.
(5) Does the proposal lie withm a 100-year flood plain? If so, note the
location on the site plan
No.
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated _
volume of discharge
No
b. Ground:
(1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
groundwater? Grve general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities, if known
PinecroJt Busmess Center Environmental Checkllst 7 061I1198
98-010
' I ' ` ' •
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
Water for the project site will be provided by Irvin Water District
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility Describe the
general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) is expected to
serve
None, on-site sewer service will be provided and connected to the
Spokane County sewer system Future flows are estimated to be
7,500 gallons per day based on 500 tota.l employees (15 gpd per
employee).
(3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of
sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below
the ground surface (includang systems such as those of the disposal
of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of
_ system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system, •
and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including
materials which may enter the system madvertently through spills or
- as a result of fire fighting activities)
Water will be discharged to groundwater through the stormwater
collectionldisposal system Stormwater will be directed into "208"
swales where it will infiltrate into the ground and percolate through
the subsurface matenals. Drywells may be used to facilitate
stormwater disposal vvithin the infiltration swales The stormwater
control facilities vvill be designed and constructed in accordance with
the County's "208" drainage requirements and the Guidelines for
Stormwater Manaeement
Run-off from developed areas picks up various contarnuiants as it
passes over paved surfaces, rooftops, and landscaped area5.
Contaminants sources and types may include:
• Vehicles - lubricants, hydraulic fluids, coolants, rubber from
tires, dirt carried on undercamages and fenders, wearing vehicle
components, fuel residue, particulate exhaust erYUSSions, brake
and clutch lining materials
• Paving surface material - asphalt and its decomposition products,
Portland cement, aggregates, road marking paint, expansion joint
compounds, and crack fillers
• Atrnosphenc fallout - deposited airbome materials
• Run-off from adjacent area - silt leaves, grass clippings, soil
stabilizers, growth control compounds
• Litter - tobacco and numerous other items
Pinecroft Business Center Envrronnrenta! Checklist 8 06111198
98-010
' ^ • ' r ♦ w"f9\ ♦l~~..•
fr
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN,. ~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
• Spills - oil spills, gasoline spills, cherrucal spills, etc.
• Ice control compounds - salts and additives
• Fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides.
(4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels)
be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanlcs? If so, what
types and quantities of materials will be stored?
No.
(5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to
percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals
out of disposal systems described m 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
N/A
c. Water Run-off (including storm water):
(1) Descnbe the source of run-off (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where
will this water flo«+9 Will this Water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
See answer to 3.b.(3). Disposal of collected stormwater will be
th.rough infiltration into the soils from "208" swales and possibly
drywells.
(2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a
location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or
to a storrn water disposal system discharging to surface or
groundwater? No. -
(3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe. -
No.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run-off water
impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aguifer Sensitive
Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities conceming
Sections 3B(4), 3B(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist):
Measures to control impacts include connection to public sewer and J~Z-
com liance with the Coun 's Guidelines for Stormwater ManaQement
X
con erning collection/disposal of stormwater run-off
Pinecroft Busrness Center Environmenta! Checklrst 9 ~ 06111198
98-010
' . , • .
JKANE ENVIROrTMENTAL ORDINAN. _
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
X evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine, other.
X shrubs
X grass
X pasture
X crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other.
other types of vegetation.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered9
Most existing vegetation will be removed and replaced with landscaping to
meet the County landscapmg requirements Some of the trees in the
eastern area of the site may be maintained and incorporated into the
landscaping.
c. List threatened or endangered species lanown to be on or near the site.
None.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any•
A rrux of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs, grass and groundcover
vvill be planted along the site perimeter landscape areas and within the
interior landscape areas
5. AIVIMALS
a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near ihe site
or are known to be on or near the site
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
mammals. deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish bass, saLnon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
other:
Songbirds.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Prnecroft Business Center Environmental Cireck/!st 10 06111198
98-010
-)K:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL OYZDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
None. _
c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explam.
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any•
, ~ J► , , ~~~1
None. X~"
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES .AX~~
a. What kinds of energY (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solaz) will `be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Energy sources for heating and ventilation will consist of both electricity
and natural gas.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If sc; generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any-
The proposed building structures will utilize energy conservation features
such as modern insulation and energy efficient heating and ventilation
systems.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, includmg exposure to toxic
chemicals, nsk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The risk of fire or accidental injury during consiruction and following
occupation of the building structures is always a possibility.
(1) Descnbe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services that might be required include police, fire, and
ambulance
PinecroJt Business Center Envrronmenta! Checkltst 11 06111198
98-010
_)KANIf E;NVTRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any
Compliance with appropnate health, buildmg, fire, and safety codes
and ordinances will minimize the potential for bealth hazards to site
workers, employees, and the public. Because of the increased
potential for injury during construction, site contractors will be
required to ta.ke special measures (e.g. security fences and guards) to
ensure that employees and the public are not allowed into the
construction areas Use of building sprmlder systems and fire alarms
will minimize the potential for injury if a fire were to occur.
b Noise:
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Existing traffic noise occurs along Pines Road, which is part of the
state highway system (SR-27). _
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: _
traffic) construction, operation, other)? IncLcate what hours noise
would come from the site.
Both construction (short-term) and operational (long-term) noises
will accur as a result of the proposed project. Noise will be
generated during construction activities that may impact on-site
employees and adjacent land uses. Construction noises will result
from road and utility development, site preparation, and building
construction. Earth moving equipment which includes compactors,
backhoes, tractors, scapers, gra.ders, pavers, and trucks generate
noise ranging from 72 to 96 dbA (observed from a distance of 50
feet). Matenals ha.ndling equipment, including concrete mrxers and
concrete pumps, generate sounds ranging from 75 to 88 dbA.
Pumps, generators, and compressors generate sounds ranging from
70 to 87 dbA, and jack hammers and rock drills generate peak
sounds of around 90 dbA. Once the major ground work is
accomplished, including the digging of foundations and footings for
structures and building additions, the noise peaks that are generated
will be directly related to the erection of structures and landscaping
activities. This includes hammering and sawing, as well as truck
traffic that will be hauling supplies and materials. The maximum
noise levels generated by these activities could range from 70 to 90
dbA. It should be noted that sounds onginatzng from temporary sites
as a result of construction activity (which mtrudes on residentiai
areas) are eYempt from noise restnctions mandated by the
Plnecroft Business Center Envrronmental Checklrst 12 06111198
98-OIO
. . • .
)KANE ENVIRONMENTAL 0'RDINAN. .
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.23 0(1)
Washingto❑ Administrative Code (WAC) This is provided these
intrusions do not occur between the hours of 10.00 pm and 7:00 am.
Normal operation of the proposed facility will generate noise
associated with vehicular traffic.
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction activities vvill be restricted to weekdays between 7:00
am and 6:00 pm to reduce impacts on adjacent land uses. Traffic
noise will be mitigated by use of the site during normal business
hours (typically 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday).
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The majority of the site supports limited agricultural crop producbon and
includes one single-family residence. .
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Yes. The northern area of the site is and has historically been used for
production of limited agricultural crops.
c. Descnbe any structures on the site.
There is one single-family residence and associated out-buildi.ngs located
at the northeastem corner of the site.
d Will any structures be demolished? If so, which?
The current owner of the site will maintain the existing single-family
residence for up to 5 years following approval of the rezone and transfer
of ownership to the project proponent, after which all building structures
associated with the single-family residence will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-10)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Urban and Rural
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
Ptnecroft Busrness Center Envlronmenta! Checkllst 13 06111198
98-010 .
~ .JKANE~ETVVIRONMENTAL C}RDINAN .
~ (WAC 197-11-960) Secfian 11 10 230(1)
NI,A
, h Has any part af the stte 6een classified as an "environmentatYy sensitive"
area? If sa, specify.
The site is deslgnated as Urban Natural Open Space an tho Caunty
Cn~ical Areas map.
1. Approx.imately how many people would reside or vvork in the completed
praaect?
Based on a total bullding area of 165,400 square feet, approximateiy 500
people are esttma#ed to be emplayed at the site fallowing full buitd-out af
the propased project.
J Approximately how many peop1e would the completed projec# dbsplace?
~
1be existing residence would rematn occupied by the current owner far a
few years, then the occupant wautd be requlred to move.
k. Praposed measure to avaid ar reduce displacement impacts, ifany:
"The exist'mg residence urill be allowed to remain for up to S yeaurs
folIawing apgroval ofthe rezone and transfer of ownership to the praject
proponent
1, Praposed memures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projec#ed land uses and plans, if any
The intent vf the UR-3.5 zone is to promote areas of primarily single-
farnily residentia1 use in an urbanized neighborhood setting, haViIIg a -
high level of public services. Surroundtng properties are zoned: UR-22
to the south; I-2 and UR-22 to tlie north; RR-lU to the east
(undevelaped Pinecroft Natural Area); and to the west acrass Pines
zoning corsists of UR-22 and UR-3.5. A11 0f the site except the RR-10
zane is currently within the URBAN land use category of Che Counfiy
Comprehensive Plan. 7'he castem strip is RURAL but can be
considered "TransitionaI" und~r the Spokane Caunty land use and
zonqng requirements. Characteristic features vf the URBAN category
include the most intensely develaped af all the categaries; it is
primarily aresidenttal category of single family, two family,
mrultifasnily, and cvndominium buZIdings along with neighborbood
commercial, lighx industrial, and pubiic and recreatianal facilities.
MoXe intensive uses such as light industrial are to be located near the
heavily trav+eled streets. The 1-1 zone is the most restrictive industrial
zone and is intended to prpvide compaEibility with and protection to
Pinecroft Busirtess Cerater -Enu1ronmentaI CheckJrst 14 06I11I98
9S-O10
S JK;ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN.
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
surrounding residential and commercial properties by application of
more restrictive development standards.
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high-, middle-, or low- income housing
None
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be elin-unated? Indicate
whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing
One.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
The existing residence will be allowed to remain for 5 years following ~
approval of the rezone and transfer of ownership to the project proponent.
10. AESTHETICS -
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structUre(s), not including
antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The primary exterior building material wnll be tilt up concrete with a lot of
windows and accent finishes. The building structures along Euclid will be
single story. The building structures along the south terrace will be 2
stones in height and will not exceed County Zoning Code building height
requirements of 40 feet.
n f b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
10~
None.
c ProPosed measures to reduce or control aesthetic imPacts, if anY:
The use of proper architectural design standards vvhich are sensitive to site ~
characteristics and the surrounding neighborhood will result in a positive
aesthetic unpact. Trees and shrubs will be added to the perimeter
landscape areas and parking areas as required by County landscape
re9uirements A 3-foot landscaPed berm is ProPosed along the Pines Road ~
frontage. The proposed site improvEments are expected to have a positive
impact on surrounding areas.
~
Pinecroft Business Center Environmental Checklist 15 06111198
98-010
JKANIrENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN, .
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce9 What time of day
would it mainly occur?
The buildings will include screened lights in the soffits and security
lighting at each buildi.ng entrance. Parking areas will also be lighted at
night Internal lighting will occur at night for employees and maintenance
activities. Glare from the windows at davm and dusk may also be present
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No.
c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal9
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
A well designed lighting scheme should mitigate any potential adverse
light impacts of the proposed project. Particular attention will be paid to
the potential Lght and glare intrusions on adjacent land uses. The lighting
scheme will be designed so that on-srte light sources are subdued and that
no glare intrudes on adjoining properties. Lighting impacts will be
mitigated by the use of directional, non-glare types of security liglrting
12. RECREATION
a What designated and uiformal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
The Centennial Trail is located along the Spokane River approxirriately %z
rrule.to the east of the site.
b. Would the proposed project dhsplace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if
any•
N/A
PlnecroJt Busrness Center Environnrental Checklist 16 06111198
98-010
. ~
S_ 1KANE ENVIROTdMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
13. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there a.ny places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state, or
local preservation registers lrnown to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe
None laiown
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of histonc arcbaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance lrnown to be on or next to the site.
Nearby, along the Centennial Trail archeological and historical evidence
of prehistoric hunter gatherers was documented in a study prepared in
1991 for the Centennial Trail Archaeologv of the Middle Spokane River
Vallev• InvestiLyations Along the SQOkane Centennial Trail.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
If any artifacts of archeological or historical significance are uncovered
during construction activity construction will be stopped and the
Washington State Archaeology and Historical Preservation Office will be
contacted.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways sernng the site and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Pines Road (SR-27) and Euclid Avenue provide access to the project site
Please refer to the Concept Site Plan for proposed access and roads
serving the site. One driveway access is proposed on Pines Road, three
driveway accesses and one private road access is proposed on Euclid
Road.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
dlstance to the nearest transit stop?
No, the nearest bus stop is located ai Sullivan by the Spokane Valley
Mall
c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project elirrunate?
The completed project will have over 600 parking spaces. The total number of
spaces required per the County Zoning code is 484. Each future building parcel
Arnecroft Business Cerrter Environmenta! Checkhst 17 06111198
98-010
~
Jk;AN E' ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN.
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
will Lnclude more than the minimum number of parking spaces reqwred per the
County Zoning Code.
d Will the proposal require any new roads, or strcets, or improvements to
eacisting roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private)
,
The project site will be served by 3 pnvate driveway accesses off of
Euclid Avenue and one private road. One driveway access off of Puies
Road is also proposed The proposed project includes development of an
intenor private road to serve the southern portion of the site that has access off of Euclid Avenue ' ?
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally descnbe.
There is a fully signalized Union Pacific Railroad crossing at Pmes and
Indiana south of the site. There is a Burlington Northem Railroad
crossing at Pines and Trent north of the site.
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, mdicate when peak would occur.
Peak vehicle trips will occur during the typical AM (7:00 to 9:00 am) and
PM (4:00 to 6:00 pm) peak hour periods. The PM peak hour tnps are the
most critical for the area. Based on PM peak hour trips for business park
(108,400 sf @ 1.29 trips/1,000 sfl and general office (60,000 sf @ 1 49
tnps/1,000 s fl uses, there will be approximately 230 PM peak hour trips
Approximately 17 percent of these trips would be entering the site (39)
and 83 percent would be exztmg the site (191) during the PM peak hour.
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any.
,2fL' C
Please see Traffic ImPact AnalYsis PrePared bY Inland Pacific
rl ~„L
Engineering, Lnc. for this rezone.
~
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example• fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, oiher)? If
so, generally describe.
The proposed project will require police and fire protection and ambulance
and emergency services
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services
PinecroJt Business Center Environmental Checklist 18 06111198
98-DIO
e• ' T •
Y ~
~ .JKANE FNVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN . .
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
Landscaping design will include lighting elements that will reduce or
eliminate blind spots adjacent to the building structures The site is
designed to be effcient in terms of traffic flow and reduced accident
potential.
16. UTILITIES
a Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Electricity, natural gas, sanitary sewer, refuse collection, and telephone.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Water service will be provided by Irvin Water District. There is an
_ existing 10-inch main in Pines Road.
Sewer service for the existing residence is provided by Spokane County
- through a connection to the 18-inch sewer main in Pines Road. Sewage
flows are directed to the south.
Washington Water Power provides electricity and natural gas and US
WEST provides telephone service to the project site.
Sewer, phone, power, and natural gas are all currently extended into the
project site from adjacent lines. The on-site lines will need to be relocated
to serve the proposed building structures as necessary.
Prnecroft Business Center Environmenta! Checklrst 19 061II198
98-010
' - . .
, , .
S JKANE ENVIlZONMENTAL ORDINAN.
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the
best of my lazowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful rrusrepresentation or wnllful lack of
full disclosure on my part, the aRencv may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist.
Date: C) Q Proponent. John Miller, Lumber Yard I nve s tment s, LLc
I/k- (Please Print of Type)
Signature. , „Address: 10220 N Nevada
Phone: ( ) 466-8900 Snokane, WA 99208
Person completing form: Patti Idlof c/o Ramm Associates, Inc Date: June 1998
Phone: (509) 534-8086
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff mem ,bpr(sj,teviewing eklis .
I- ~ . ,
Bas n this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff:
A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination
of nonsignifica.nce.
B Concludes that probable sigmficant adverse environmental impacts do exast for the current
proposal and recommends a miUgated determination of nonsignificance with conditions.
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environment impacts and recommends a deterrninatio
of significance - - ' _
Pinecroft Busrness Center Environmental Checkltst 20 06110198
98-010
a
Page 1 of 1
• o . - County ' blic Works,
Transportation • - . Section,
D • • County • 3
Memo
To: John Pederson ~ ~
From: Scott Engeihard .~~J~
,
Subject ZE-0005-98
Applicant Ramm & Associates
Date: June 25, 1998 .
Re: Zone Change Application
~
A Traffic Study is required for this proposal and must be accepted by the County Engmeer prior to a
determination of technical completeness. We have conducted a scoping meeting for the study and will
conduct a review at such time the study is submitted for acceptance by the County Engineer.
• Page 1
CC: «ApplicantName»
«Engineei-LookUp»
« BwldingPlanningGontact»
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 1.15 PM
To: Pederson, John
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy, Busko, Doug, Miller, Katherine
Subject: ZE-5-98 - John Miller
6-18-98
I received the above referenced application on June 17, 1998.
This project lies in an area of approved soils so a concept drainage plan is not required
I have no knowledge of any critical areas on this site.
I consider this application to be technically complete.
FW ~ J
Page 1
,
AdMkk
Washington State Eastern Region
v7AP Department of Transportation 2714 N Mayfair Street
Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Sid Morrison
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000
June 25, 1998
N1r. John Pederson
Spokane County Planning
West 1026 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re: ZE-5-98 (Divcon Rezone)
Dear Mr. Pederson:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) along with the County
Engineers met with the applicant's representative on June 1, 1998 to scope the needed
traffic study for this development. It is our understanding that this traffic study is
currently being prepared in regard to this project. Due to the potential traffic impacts this
development may have on the surrounding transportation system we ask that this traffic
study be reviewed and accepted by both us and the County Engineers before this project is
deemed technically complete.
If you should have any questions regarding the above please feel free to contact me at 324-
6199.
Sincerely,
0
C
Greg Figg
Transportation Planner
GF:
cc: Scott Engelhard, Spokane County Engineers
Patti Idlof, Ramm and Associates
PAGE 1 ' 13:46:54 17 JUN 1998
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
01163 EUCLID AV (START) 00.000 DORA ST (END) & SPOK U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16
EUCLID AV 00.060 COLEMAN RD U 19 PAVED 18
00.110 LILY RD U 19 PAVED 18
00.190 GIRARD RD U 19 PAVED 18
00.250 BOWMIIN RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 18
00.310 PARK RD U 16 PAVED 22
00.380 EDGERTON RD U 16 PAZTED 22
00.440 CENTER RD U 16 PAVED 22
00.500 ELY RD U 16 PAVED 22
00.560 ELLA RD U 16 PAVED 22
00.620 ELTON RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
00.680 DICK RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
00.740 LEWIS RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22
EUCLID AV (END) 00.810 VISTA RD & MILLWOOD U 16 PAVED 22
01165 EUCLID AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO SULLIVAN U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22
EUCLID AV 00.250 SULLIVAN RD U 17 PAVED 40
00.410 1ST ST U 17 PAVED 40
00.630 MOORE LN (PVT RD) U 17 PAVED 40
00.880 MARIETTA AV (END) U 17 PAVED 40
01.020 SHAMROCK LN (PVT RD) U 17 PAVED 40
01.270 RAILROAD CROSSING U 17 PAVED 40
EUCL I D AV ( END ) 01.310 FLOR.A RD U 17 PAVED 40
01166 EUCLID AV (START) 00.000 FLOR.A RD U 17 PAVED 22
EUCLID AV 00.230 TSCHIRLEY RD (STAR.T) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22
EUCLID AVE 00.600 EDEN ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22
EUCLID AV 00.890 MCKEE ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22
EUCLID AV (END) 00.970 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22
01178 EUCLID AV (START) 00.000 BARKER RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
EUCLID AV 00.750 MEYERS RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.000 CAMPBELL RD (START) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.260 ASHTON RD (START) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.500 KENNEY RD (START) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.750 CORRIGAN RD (START) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
EUCLID RD 02.000 HARVARD RD U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
EUCLID AV 02.260 ARDEN RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
02.500 LYNDEN RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
02.760 GARRY RD ( S TA.RT ) U 16 L I GHT B I TUM . 18
03.000 MOLTER RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
03.250 STEVENSON RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
EUCLID AV (END) 03.300 RIVER RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01164 EUCLID AV (START) 00.000 SR 27 (PINES RD) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
00.670 WALK IN THE WILD ZOO U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
01167 EUCL I D RD ( S TART ) 00.000 CARS TENS RD ( START ) R 08 GR.AVEL 20
EUCLID RD 01.040 STROUP RD R 08 GRAVEL 18
02.050 COULEE HITE RD R 08 GRAVEL 16
03.060 LADD RD ( END ) R 08 GR.AVEL 20
04.070 WOOD RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
EUCLID RD (END) 05.150 RITCHEY RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
01203 EUCLID RD (START) 00.000 WEST END TO GORDON R R 09 GR.AVEL 20
EUCL I D RD 00.520 GORDON RD ( END ) R 09 GR.AVE L 20
00.780 R.AMBO CT R 09 GR.AVEL 26
EUCL I D RD ( END ) 01.040 R.AMBO RD R 09 PAVED 28
01204 EUCLID RD (START) 00.000 RAMBO RD R 09 GR.AVEL 20
00.100 END PAVEMENT/START G R 09 GRAVEL 20
EUCLID RD 01.240 BR 1502 OVER DEEP CR R 09 GRAVEL 20
01.300 GARFIELD RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 20
02.720 LYONS RD (START) & E R 09 GR.AVEL 20
02.750 BR 1508 GVER iSNRR TR R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
03.200 HAYFORD RD (END) & E R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
PAGE 2 1. F* 13:46:57 17 JUN 1998
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
03.240 Y@ HAYFORD & EUCLID R 09 GR.AVEL 12
04.210 END GRAVEL/START PAV R 09 GR.AVEL 14
EUCLID RD (END) 04.610 OLD TRAILS RD R 09 GRAVEL 28
01205 EUCLID RD (START) 00.000 OLD TRAILS RD R 09 GRAVEL 28
EUCLID RD 00.500 DOWDY RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 14
00.850 SPOTTED RD (END) & I R 09 PAVED 24
01.330 TR.AILS RD (END) R 09 PAVED 24
01168 EUCLID RD (START) 00.000 RITCHEY RD R 09 GR.AVEL 20
EUCLID RD (END) 00.800 DEEP CREEK RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
10 Records Processed
Tra f f i c Count s'` ~
Road Name Location.................... Leg Count...
EUCLID AV at PARK RD E 588
EUCLID AV at SULLIVAN RD E 5711
EUCLID AV at SULLIVAN RD W 4920
EUCLID AV at CAMPBELL RD (START) E 2284
EUCLID AV at CAMPBELL RD (START) W 1098
EUCLID AV 55 ft before HARVARD RD E 2777
EUCLID AV 55 ft before HARVARD RD W 1595
EUCLID AV (END) at VISTA RD W 1354
EUCLID AV (END) at FLORA RD W 3763
EUCLID AV (END) at BARKER RD W 3380
EUCLID AV (START) at FLORA RD E 4325
EUCLID AV (START) at BARKER RD E 3426
EUCLID RD at COULEE HITE RD E 43
EUCLID RD at COULEE HITE RD W 109
EUCLID RD at WOOD RD E 127
EUCLID RD at WOOD RD W 39
EUCLID RD at RAMBO CT W 278
EUCLID RD at LYONS RD (START) E 521
EUCLID RD at LYONS RD (START) W 227
EUCLID RD (END) at DEEP CREEK RD W 23
EUCLID RD (END) at OLD TR.AILS RD W 97
EUCLID RD (START) at CARSTENS RD (START) E 106
EUCLID RD (START) at R.AMBO RD E 75
EUCLID RD (START) at OLD TR.AILS RD E 63
h '
RECE VED
JUN
1 7 1998
5 Y O K A N F- N-*K4k-C0U" E:
NGINFFR
[3U1[_DING AND PI.ANNING • DivasION oF rrrr Put3i.ac WOR+cs DErAArMi.N E
FS l.. MnNSnN. C.B.o. n:r;ruro,; nr•NNiS M. 5(-or-r, 11 r„ nn%u:c7(,,:
\ 1 F1 C)1Z AN U t ':11
TO: ~(?:li::_til~ Lt)lilii:4I)i'.'l::i<tl7 LI1olIi~.;c:Iilt~: 1'al I l~ti ,
Spakane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderb~
qpokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve 1:
wmwater Utility; Brenda Sims
)evelapment Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
r)c;pAriment of Transportation, Greg Figg
,Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Miles
pokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
Iioundary Review Board; Susan Wiifchell
I_ong Range Planning Division; John Mercer
t:ast Valley School District No. 361
f- i re District No. 1
1 rvin Water District No. C
FRON7: Juhn Pederson, Senior Planne '
DATE: June 16, 1998
RF.: 7.E-5-98, Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential- 3.S (LiR- 31.5) znd
IZtiril Residential- 10 (RR-1(?) to IIIdLIS1C1a1 PaI•k (I-1 )
TECftN CAL REVj,4 W MEETINC;
JUE 25.1998 AT 1:15
I)IVISIOIV UF 13L;II,DiNG ANn PT,4?VN1NG 1'` FLOOR CnNFERENCE ROn1-]
I'lease review the above applieation and use the attac:.hecl '[F-C:f INICA[- REVIBk' h1[vt-"I'[NG
roRM for your camments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to
atcend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this
rneeting. If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments
on the attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS
will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and
['lanning file. Thanks for your cooperation. If vr~ti liave ~~n}' C~IleStintlS ~~bozit t}ze
application, please contact mc at 4~6-3<7'~. y
NOTF: The Division of Buildinb ~L Ptanning i~•itl now, tae circulating cornments fi~r SI~,E':
Checklist at t6e time of technical review. This will be the only time you %4,ill hc
ablc to comment regarclin(i the SF,1'11 Checl:list for this projc1rt.
c: .IoIln Miller, Lumber Yard Irivcst»ltnts, 1__IsC, PO I3ox 1 S70S, Spc>l~anc. %VA 99-108
I'atti Idlof, Ramm Associates, 25 S. Altamont, Spokane, VWA 99202
I'atrick Moorc;, inland I'acific Engineering, 707 W. 7''', #200, Spokaile, tA`:1 992()4
AttaCl1I11C',I1lS: '1'eclinica! Rcview Fornt, Project ApplicRtion, Site Plan, SEPA Chcrk li~c
1026 WFST RROAUWAYAVENUi: • S('()KANE, {^1nSHfN(:TY)NQ, ()Zn()
I'( t()Ni~~ (5f)t)) -1,rifi-3675 • C'AX: (901)) 4;fi-•1%f)3
"rC)p: (5(l9) 'i24 -31t;f I
. ,
Technical Review for June 25, 1998 at 1: 15 p.m.
Generally located east of Pines (SR-27) and south of Euclid, in the NW 1/4
of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and Rural
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) to Industrial
Park (I-1) on approximately 15 acres for those uses allowed within the
Industrial Park (I-1) zone.
PARCEL NUMBERS: 45102.9008 AND PORTION OF 45105.9072
SITE SIZE: Approximately 15 acres.
APPLICANT: John Miller
PO Box 18708
Spokane, WA 99208-0708
(509) 466-8900
.
PROJECT CONTACT: Patti Idlof, Ramm Associates
25 S. Altamont
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 534-8086
ASSIGNED PLANNER: John Pederson
r
i r
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL (JRDINAN
WAC 197-11-960 Section 11.10.230(1)
Environmental Checklist
File No. ZG' 5-98
Purpose of Checkhst:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21 C RCW requires all governmental agencies to
consider the envuonmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals vvith probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of
the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify
impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avold unpacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help
the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Apphcant:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic uiformation about your proposal. Governmental
agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,
. requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, vnth the most precise information lrnown, or
give the best description you can
' You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire
experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a questions does not apply to your proposal, write "do not
. kiiow" or "Does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designation.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems the govemmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of tune or
on different parcels of land Attach any additional uiformation that will describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to eYplain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checkbst for nonproject proposals.
Complete this checlc.list for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN
ADDI'TION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
Prnecroft Busrrress Center Envrronmental Checklist 1 06111198
98-010
,
.1KANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN. ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
. Pinecroft Business Center
2. Name of applicant:
Lumber Yard Investments, LLC
3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person.
Applicant - Contact Person.
John Miller c/o Lumber Yard Investments, LLC Cathy Ramm, Ramm Associates, Inc.
PO Box 18708 25 S. Altamont
Spokane, WA 99208-0708 Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 466-8900 (509) 534-8086
4. Date checklist prepared-
June 1998 +
5. Agency requesting checklist-
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
6. Proposed timing or schedule (includuig phasing, if applicable):
Construction of first initial building is anticipated during the fall of 1998. Full build-out of the site to
occur over a 5- 10 year time period
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain
Application for a Short Plat to establish first parcels for development and later application for a Binding
Site Plan to establish individual parcels for the southern and eastern area of the site.
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to tllis proposal? If yes, explain
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
A Level I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared for the project site. A SEPA environmental
checklist for a short plat currently in process
Prnecrolt Busrness Center Envrronmental Checklrst 2 061II198
98-010
. . . ~ r
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
9 Do you lrnow whether applications are pendmg for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain
The 15 acre site is proposed for a Short Plat to enable timely building permit issuance for the first
building Property adjacent to the east is part of the Mirabeau Point Master Plan. An Environmental
Impact Statement has been prepared for tims project which includes a Comprehensive Plan amendment and
zone reclassification. The adjacent property is proposed to be reclassified from Urban to Commercral
and rezoned from Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) to Community Business (B-2). The proposed use for the
adjacent property as identified in the Mirabeau Point Master Plan is for a recreational vehicle park and
business uses. An amendment to the Arterial Road Plan is also included which would reclassify Euclid
Avenue from a local access roadway to a minor arterial.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if laiown.
Environmental threshold determination, site plan approval, and all required permits for water, sewer,
roads, drainage, and buildings, water plan approval from Irvin Water District.
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project
and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
.
A rezone from UR-3.5 and RR-10 to Industrial Park (I-1) is requested for the 15 acre project site to
enable development of a business park which would include light industrial and office uses. The
Conceptual Site Plan shows the general location and dimensions of buildings, parking areas, driveways,
roads and landscaping. A more detailed site plan will be submitted with each application for a building
permit. There are four large buildings (27,100 SF each) fronting on Euclid Avenue which are provided
access via pnvate driveways and one private road. Two additional buildings (30,000 SF each) are
planned for the southern temace area with access via a private road extension from Euclid Avenue.
Building on-site will start on the west side and proceed east, with the upper terrace area to be developed
last. The existing house and outbuildings will remain occupied by the current property owner for up to
five years. These buildings will be removed prior to construction in the eastem area of the site.
12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of
your proposed project, includuig a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a
proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit application related to this checklist.
The project site is located at the southeast corner of Pmes Road and Euclid Avenue in the Spokane Valley,
in Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, VV M.
A conceptual site plan which includes a vicuuty map is provided with thus environmental checklist.
13. Does the proposed action Le within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area
(GSSA)? The Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA)? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA
Overlay Zone Atlas for boundanes)
Pinecroft Business Center Envrronmenta! Checklist 3 06111198
98-010
r .
a '
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANr,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
ASA - Yes; GSSA - Yes; PSSA - Yes; City of Spokane - No
The project site is located within the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) boundary adopted by Spokane
County on February 11, 1997
Prnecro, ft Busrness Center Environmental Checkltst 4 06111198
98-010
1 ( '
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation For
Agency Use Only '
1. EARTH
a General descnption of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, Mly, steep slopes,
mountainous, otber:
Mostly flat with a terraced area in ihe southeastern portion of the site
b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The majonty of the site is relatively flat (0 to 1% slopes) with steeper
slopes in the southeastern portion of the site (16 to 25% slopes).
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you lrnow the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland .
Garrison gravelly, 0 to 5% slopes. This soil type is somewhat excessively
drained wrth finer textured layers of yellowish brown sand. It is
characterized by moderately rapid permeability, slow surface run-off,
slight hazard of erosion, low water holding capacity, and high shear
strength. Imgated GgA soils have been identified as areas of prime
farmland according to the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
The agricultural capability unit is IIIs-2
d. Are there surface incLcations or history of unstable soils in the ixnmediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
1'he on-site soils will be disrupted and somewhat displaced during site
preparation activities including initial surface grading, excavating
foundations, utility installation, and final site grading. Adequate
amounts of fill materials are located on-site to balance any grading
during construction.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of cleanng, construction, or use? If so,
generally descnbe
Soils Nvill be exposed during construction of the project, thereby increasing the
potential for Nvind and water erosion during construction This will be a short-
Pinecroft Busrness Center Environmental Checklrst S 061I1198
98-010
. ,
- JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
term impact until site surfacing and/or vegetation is established.
g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
a
Approxirriately 60 to 65 percent of the site will consist of impervious
surfaces including buildings, parking areas, and roadways.
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other unpacts to the
earth, if any:
Site construction of sewer, water, and roads will occur during the
spring, summer, and fall months of the year. Wind erosion can be
controlled by watering the soil during construction. Construction and
placement of on-site drainage control measures (i.e. berms, ditches,
and culverts) will limit impacts of water erosion, if any, to the site.
2. AIR •
a. VVhat type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) dunng consil-uction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approxirriate quantities if lrnown
There are four potential sources of air pollution during the construction
phase of the proposed project: 1) dust from various construction and
earthmovuig operations, 2) hydrocarbon evaporation from priming and
paving operations, 3) carbon monoxide from the queuing of vehicular
traffic and related reductions in vehicular speeds near the construction
site, and 4) pollutant emissions from the operation of construction
equipment. Dust is the pnmary on-site source of air emissions during the
construction phase of the project It is anticipated that some fugitive dust
emissions will be generated during construction, particularly since most of
the construction activities will take place during the drier summer months.
Proposed light industrial uses are not expected to result in any significant
increase in air emissions over existing conditions.
b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other umpacts to air,
if any.
Prnecroft Busrness Center Environmenta! Checklrst 6 06111198
98-010
.1K:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL OkD1NAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Watering of on-site soils to control dust emissions will occur as necessary
during construction. Construction and vehicular emissions are regulated
to reduce impacts; no additional control of exhaust emissions is required.
3. WATER
a Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate viculity of the
site includuig year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
No.
(3) Estimate the amount of fill"and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate ihe
area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
No.
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note the
location on the site plan
No.
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No.
b Ground.
(1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities, if known.
Pinecroft Business Center Envrronmental Checklrst 7 06111198
98-010
.
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Sechon 11.10.230(1)
Water for the project site will be provided by Irvin Water District
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility Descnbe the
general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) is expected to
serve
None, on-site sewer service will be provided and connected to the
Spokane County sewer system. Future flows are estimated to be
71500 gatlons per day based on 500 total employees (15 gpd per
employee).
(3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of
sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below
the ground surface (uicludmg systems such as those of the disposal
of storm water or drainage from floor drauas). Describe the type of
system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system,
and the types of materials hkely to be disposed of (including
materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or
as a result of fire fighting activities).
Water will be d.ischarged to groundwater through the stormwater
collection/disposal system Stormwater will be directed into "208"
swales where it will infiltrate into the ground and percolate through
the subsurface materials. Drywells may be used to facilitate
stormwater disposal within the infiltration swales. The stormwater
control facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with
• the County's "208" drainage requirements and the Guidelines for
Stormwater Management
Run-off from developed areas picks up various contaminants as it
passes over paved surfaces, roo$ops, and landscaped areas.
Contaminants sources and types may include
0 Vehicles - lubricants, hydraulic fluids, coolants, rubber from
tires, dirt carried on undercamages and fenders, wearing vehicle
components, fuei residue, particulate exhaust emissions, brake
and clutch lining materials
0 Paving surface maieria] - asphalt and its decomposition products,
Portland cement, aggregates, road markuig paint, expansion joint
compounds, and crack fillers
• Atmospheric fallout - deposited airborne materials
• Run-offfrom adjacent area - silt leaves, grass clippings, so21
stabilizers, growth control compounds
• Litter - tobacco and numerous other items
Pmecroft Business Center Envrronmenta! Checklrst 8 06111198
98-010
. , • ,
iKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN. ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
• Spills - oil spills, gasoline spills, chemical spills, etc.
• Ice control compounds - salts and additives
• Fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides
(4) Will any chemicals (especially orgatvc solvents or petroleum fuels)
be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what
types and quantities of matenals will be stored?
No.
(5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills
of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to
percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals
out of disposal systems descnbed in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
N/A
c Water Run-off (including storm water)
(1) Describe the source of run-off (includuig storm water) and method of
collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if lrnown). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
See ans-vver to 3 b.(3). Disposal of collected stormwater will be _
through uifiltration into tlie soils from "208" swales and possibly
drywells.
(2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a
location where a spiU or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or
to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or
groundwater? No.
(3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally descnbe
No.
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run-off water
unpacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aguifer Sensitive
Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning
Sections 3B(4), 313(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist):
Measures to control impacts include connection to public sewer and
compliance with the Counfiy's Guidelines for Stormwater Mana2ement
concem.ing collection/disposal of stormwater run-off
Ptnecroft Busrness Center Envrronmental Checkllst 9 061I1198
98-010
. , '
JKANE ENVIRONM.ENTAL ORDINAN, ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree. alder, maple, aspen, other
X evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other.
X shrubs
X grass
X pasture
X crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk
cabbage, other.
water plants- water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other.
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Most existing vegetation wnll be removed and replaced with landscaping to
meet the County landscaping requirements. Some of the trees in the
eastern area of the site may be maintained and incorporated into the
landscaping.
c List threa.tened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs, grass and groundcover
will be planted along the slte perimeter landscaQe areas and within the
interior landscape areas.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the srte
or are knoNvn to be on or near the site:
birds. hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
marnmals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other•
fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other.
other:
Songbirds.
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the srte.
Prnecroft Busrness Center Environmental Checklrst 10 06111198
98-010
)KANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
None.
c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
None.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturuig, etc.
Energy sources for heating and ventilation will consist of both electricity
- and natural gas.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
" properties? If so, generally describe
No.
c What ki.nds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
The proposed buildmg structures will utilize energy conservation features
such as modern insulation a.nd energy efficient heating and ventilation
systems.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The risk of fire or accidental injury during constructioo and following
occupation of the building structures is always a possibility.
(1) Desenbe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services that might be required include police, fire, and
ambulance.
Pinecroft Business CeRter Envrronmental Checklrst 11 06111198
98-010
JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envirorunental health
hazards, if any:
Compliance with appropriate health, building, fire, and safety codes
and ordulances will mimmize the potential for health hazards to site
workers, employees, and the public. Because of the increased
potential for injury during construction, site contractors will be
required to take special measures (e.g secunty fences and guards) to
ensure that employees and the public are not allowed into the
construction areas. Use of building sprmkler systems and fire alarms
will minimize the potential for injury if a fire were to occur.
b. Noise:
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for exarnple- traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Existing traffic noise occurs along Pines Road, which is part of the
state highway system (SR-27).
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:
traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site.
Both construcUon (short-term) and operational (long-term) noises
will occur as a result of the proposed project. Noise will be
generated during construction activities that may unpact on-site
employees and adjacent land uses. Construction noises will result
from road and utility development, site preparation, and building
construction Earth moving equipment which includes compaciors,
backhoes, tractors, scapers, graders, pavers, and trucks generate
noise ranging from 72 to 96 dbA (observed from a distance of 50
feet). Materials handling equipment, including concrete rruxers and
concrete pwnps, generate sounds ranging from 75 to 88 dbA.
Pumps, generators, and compressors generate sounds ranging from
70 to 87 dbA, and jack hammers and rock drills generate peak
sounds of around 90 dbA. Once the major ground work is
accomplished, includmg the digging of foundations and footings for
structures and building addrtions, the noise peaks that are generated
Nvill be directly related to the erection of structures and landscaping
activities This includes hammering and sawmg, as well as truck
' traffic that will be hauling supplies arid matenals The max.imum
noise levels generated by these activities could range from 70 to 90
dbA. It should be noted that sounds onginating from temporary sites
as a result of construction activity (which intrudes on residential
areas) are exempt from noise restrictions mandated by the
PrnecroJt Busrness Center Environniental Checklrst 12 06111198
98-010
• , ' ' .
-)K:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN. .
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Washington Administrative Code (WAC). This is provided these
intrusions do not occur between the hours of 10.00 pm and 7:00 am.
Normal operation of the proposed facility will generate noise
associated with vehicular traffic.
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any.
Construction activities Nvill be restncted to weekdays between 7:00
am and 6 00 pm to reduce impacts on adjacent land uses. Traffic
noise will be mitigated by use of the site during normal business
hours (typically 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Fnday)
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The majonty of the site supports limited agricultural crop production and -
includes one single-family residence
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. "
Yes. The northern area of the site is and has histoncally been used for
production of lunited agricultural crops.
c. Descnbe any structures on the site
There is one single-family residence and associated out-buildings located
at ttie northeastern corner of the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which?
The current owner of the site will maintain the existing single-family
residence for up to 5 years following approval of the rezone and transfer
of ownership to the project proponent, after which all building structures
associated with the single-family residence will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-10)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Urban and Rural
g If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
PrnecroJt Business Center Errvironmenta! Checklist 13 06111198
98-010
` c
-)KANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN ,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitivc"
area? If so, specify
The site is designated as Urban Natural Open Space on the County
Critical Areas map.
i Approximately how many people would reslde or work in the completed
project?
Based on a total building area of 168,400 square feet, approximately 500
people are estimated to be employed at the site following full build-out of
the proposed project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
The existing residence would remain occupied by the current owner for a
few years, then the occupant would be required to move.
k. Proposed measure to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
The existing residence will be allowed to remain for up to 5 years
following approval of the rezone and transfer of ownership to the project
proponent.
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
The intent of the UR-3.5 zone is to promote areas of primarily single-
family residential use in an urbanized neighborhood setting, having a
high level of public services. Surrounding properties are zoned: UR-22
to the south; I-2 and UR-22 to the north; RR-10 to the east
(undeveloped Pinecroft Natural Area); and to the west across Pines
zoning consists of UR-22 and UR-3.5. All of the site except the RR-10
zone is currently within the URBAN land use category of the County
Comprehensive Plan. The eastern strip is RUR.AL but can be
considered "Transitional" under the Spokane County land use and
zoning requirements. Characteristic features of the URBAN category
include the most intensely developed of all the categories; it is
primarily a residential category of single family, two family,
multifamily, and condominium buildings along with neighborhood
commercial, light industrial, and public and recreational facilities.
More intensive uses such as light industrial are to be located near the
heavily traveled streets. The I-1 zone is the most restrictive industrial
zone and is intended to provide compatibility with and protection to
Prnecroft $usiness Center Envrronmental Checklrst 14 06111198
98-010
. • ~
~KANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN.
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1)
surrounding residential and commercial properties by application of
more restrictive development standards.
9. HOUSING
a ApproYimately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high-, middle-, or low- income housing.
None.
b. Approxirriately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing
One.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
- The existing residence will be allowed to remain for 5 years following
approval of the rezone and transfer of ownership to the pro}ect proponent.
' 10. AESTHETICS
a What is the tallest heigbt of any proposed structure(s), not including -
antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The pnmary exterior building material will be tilt up concrete with a lot of
windows and accent finishes The building structures along Euclid will be
single story. The building structures along the south terrace will be 2
stories in height and will not exceed County Zoning Code building height
requirements of 40 feet.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesihetic unpacts, if any:
The use of proper architectural design standards which are sensitive to site
characteristics and the surrounding neighborhood will result in a positive
aesthetic impact. Trees and shrubs will be added to the perimeter
landscape areas and parking areas as required by County landscape
requirements. A 3-foot landscaped berm is proposed along the Pines Road
frontage. The proposed site improvements are expected to have a positive
impact on surrounding areas.
Pinecroft Busrness Center Envrronmenta! Checklrst 15 06111198
98-010
!s_ .JKANE E1`1 Y 1R1 /111Y1EN14 A1 . VRDI1'1 AN, . ~
(WAc 197-11-960) secaon LL 10.230(l)
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a, What type of light vr glare vrill the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mauil}+ occur?
"I'he buildings will include screened lights in t.he soffits and security
lighting at each buildmg entran+ce Parking areas will atsv be lighted at
night Xnternal hghtmg will occur at night for employees and rnauntenance
activities. ~''rIare from the windows at dawn and dusk rnay aisa be present
b. Cvuld light ar glare from the fivshed project be a safety hazard or
interfere wlth views?
No.
C. What exis#ing off-site sources o£ light or glare may affect your proposal?
None,
d Proposed rneasutes to reduce or contral light and glare irngact.s, if any
A well designed lighti,ng scheme should mitlgate any po#ential adverse
light impacts a#'the prQpased prvject Particular attentton will be paid to
the pvtential hght and glare intrusians on audaacent land uses The lighting
scherne will be desrgned sa that vn-site light sources ane subdued and that
no glare intrudes on adjouzing properties. Lighting impacts will be
mitigated by the use af directional, nan-glare types of secunty lightrng.
12. RECREATI(]N
a What designate.d and mfornnal recreational opportunities are in the
imrnediate vicinitY7
T'he Centennral Trail is located along t.he SFokane River appraximately 1/2
nule to the east af the site
b. Would the praposed praject displace any existmg rocreational uses? If so,
desr-nbe,
No.
c Frnposed rneasures to reduce or control irripacts an recLeation, including
recreatIOnal opportumties t❑ be pravided by the praject or applicant, if
any:
NlA
Prrrecrnf# Busaness Center Etrvi rorarn enla! C'heckfist 16 06I11198
98-01 0
- ~ .
~ S_ .1KANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
13. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None lrnoNvn
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological,
scientific, or cultural unportance lrnown to be on or ne.rt to the site.
Nearby, along the Centennial Trail archeological and historical evidence
of prehistoric hunter gatherers was documented in a study prepared in
1991 for the Centennial Trail ArchaeoloQv of the Middle Sookane River
Vallev• Investieations AlonE the Svokane Centennial Trail
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: •
If any artifacts of archeological or historical significance are uncovered
during construction activity construction will be stopped and the "
Washington State Archaeology and Bstorical Preservation Offce will be
contacted.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and descnbe proposed
access to the existulg street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Pines Road (SR-27) and Euclid Avenue provide access to the project site.
Please refer to the Concept Site Plan for proposed access and roads
serving tlle site. One dnveway access is proposed on Pines Road, three
driveway accesses and one private road access is proposed on Euclid
Road.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approYimate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
No, the nearest bus stop is located at Sullivan by the Spokane Valley '
Mall.
c. How many paricuig spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project elimmate?
The completed project will have over 600 parking spaces. The total number of
spaces required per the County Zoning code is 484 Each future buildulg parcel
Prnecrofi` Busrness Center Environmental Checklrst 17 06111198
98-010
, .a ) C
5_ JK;ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDTNAN.
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
will include more than the minimum number of parking spaces required per the
County Zoning Code.
d. ' Will the proposal require any new roads, or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets not inclucling dnveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
The project site will be served by 3 private driveway accesses off of
Euclid Avenue and one private road. One driveway access off of Pines
Road is also proposed. The proposed project includes development of an
interior private road to serve the southem portion of the site that has
access off of Euclid Avenue.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinifiy o fl water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally descnbe
There is a fully signalized Union Pacific Railroad crossing at Pines and
Indiana•south of the site There is a Burlington Northern Railroad
° crossing at Pines and Trent north of the site
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, mdicate when peak would occur.
Peak vehicle trips vvill occur during the typical AM (7:00 to 9.00 am) and
PM (4:00 to 6:00 pm) peak hour periods. The PM peak hour trips are the
most critical for the area. Based on PM peak hour trips for business park
(108,400 sf @ 1.29 trips/1,000 sfl and general office (60,000 sf @ 1.49
trips/1,000 sfl uses, there will be approximately 230 PM peak hour trips.
Approximately 17 percent of these trips would be entering the site (39)
and 83 percent would be exiting the site (191) during ihe PM peak hour.
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Please see Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Inland Pacific
Engineering, Inc. for this rezone.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an mcreased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
The proposed project will require police and fire protection and ambulance
and emergency sernces.
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services
Pinecroft Busmess Center Envlronmerrtal Checklist 18 061I1198
98-010
.
t ,
.
~ S_ JK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL 4RDINAN`,
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Landscaping design will include lighting elements that will reduce or
eliminate blind spots adjacent to the building structures. The site is
designed to be efficient in terms of traffic flow and reduced accident "
potential
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the srte- electricity, natural gas, '
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Electricity, natural gas, sanitary sewer, refuse collection, and telephone.
b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Water service will be provided by Irvin Water District. There is an
existing 10-inch main in Pines Road.
Sewer sernce for the existmg residence is provided by Spokane County
- through a connection to the 18-inch sewer main in Pines Road. Sewage
flows are directed to the south.
Washington Water Power provides electricity and natural gas and US
VVEST provides telephone service to the project site
Sewer, phone, power, and natural gas are all currently extended into the
project site from adjacent lines. The on-site lines will need to be relocated
to serve the proposed building siructures as necessary
Pmecroft Business Center Envlronmental Checklrst 19 061I1198
98-01 D
,
. .
S_ JKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINXN. :
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
C. SIGNATURE
I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the
best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of
full disclosure on my part, the a.eencv may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist
Date: Proponent: _John Miller, Lumber Yard Inve s tments , LLt
(Please Print of Type)
~ r
Signature. Address. 10220 N. Nevada
Phone. ( 1466-8900 Svokane, WA 99208
Person completing form: _Patti Idlof c/o Ramm Associates, Inc. Date: June 1998
Phone: (509) 534-8086
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
-
Staff member(s) reviewing checklist:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff:
A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determ.ination
of nonsignificance.
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions
C Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environment impacts and recommends a determmatio
of sigmficance.
Pinecroft Busmess Center Envrronmental Checkllst 20 06110198
98-010
, . .
~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNiNG
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATiON
PARTI
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
,
LegafOwner John Miller, r,umher varri Tnve-gtmp-nt-qrT.T.r (nnt-,nn to
MailingAddress P. O. Box 18708 ' purchase )
~
City Spokane State wA Zip Code 99208-0708
Phone 4 6 6- 89 0 0 (Work) (Home) _ Fax 4 6 6- 8 91 6
Applicant/Agent14umber YIr-d Investments; Lif c-/o Ramm Assocj,ate$, Tnc.
Mailing Address 25 South Altamont .
City Spokane State wA Zip Code 99202 `
Phone 5 3 4- 8 0 8 6 (Work) (Home) Fax 5 3 4- 81 5 9
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) 1 5+-
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft ) None
Assessor's parcel numbers of projecUproposal 4 51 0 2, 9 0 0 8, Ptn, o f 45105.9072
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controiled N/A ~
Street address of proposai East 12300 Block of Euclid Avenue
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR- 3. 5 ( 1 5 a c) & RR -1 0( 0. 4 a c). (1991)
Existing use of propertyaqriculture o;?e sa.rinlc fami] v residence w/ out
buildings
Proposed zoning Industrial Park ( I-1 )
Comprehensive plan cateyory Urban & Rural School district East Valley
Water purveyor I rv i n Fire district # 1
Proposed use of property:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes r) Business Industrial (X) Mixed use
Other - Describe of f ices and liqht industrial research & development
List previous pianning division actions involving this property None known
B. LEGAL/ZONE RCCLASSIFICATION INFOFtMATiON
Location of proposal Southeast corner of Pines Rd. & Euclid Avenue
Section 10 Township 2 5 Range 4 4
Name of public road(s) providing access Euclid Avenue & Pines Road
Width of property fronting on public road 1, 0 2 0 f t.
. , _
ZONE RECLASSIFIGI-. M APPLICATION ` PAGE 2 Of 4
a
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes No
Name(s) of arterial roads Pines Road (State HwY. 27)
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposed See attached
leQal description - All one parcel
Existing zone(s) UR- 3. 5 & RR-1 0 to proposed zone(s) I - 1
for the foilowing described property
Attach iegal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below See attached
lecjal description
If you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it? applicant has option
to purchase the property from the owner.
~
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
Propertv to the north is zoned I-2, property to the east is propsed
for rezone to B-2r property to southwest is UR-22 but developed for
offices, road improvements are proqramed for Pines Road, Euclid Road
is proposed for a minor arterial.
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
No siqnificant impact on adjacent properties. The applicant has
met with adjacent property owners
What factors support the zone reclassification? Other zoning and lancl uses planned for
the immediate area. The only adjacent residential is planned multi
family to the south. Appropriate separation is provided via topography
and landscapinq in the I-1 zone. Direct site access is provided
via Pines Road and Euclid.
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
Surroundinq land uses are compatible. The URBAN land use category
supports I-1 zoninq and the I-1 zone has qreater setback, landscaping;
• screening and use restrictions to provide compatibility in the URBAN
area. The conceptual site plan shows proposed buildinqs, setbacks
access, landscapinq, etc.
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICA'. ~i APPLICATION PAGE 3 of 4
PART II
This section of the application will provide the Division of Buiiding and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposai before final submittal
to the Division
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A This proposal is within Fire Protection District No ~
B Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water, system and faciiities for fire protection purposes.
C. Recommendecl' fire flow or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive; and will be determined at time of building permit application
D. Requirements include .n ~ .
'S. C- ~P, D. -IIIi
Fire District S e/Title Date
WATER PURVEYOR
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements (have '(have not
been made. `
B. Requirementslcomments PLW~ 4 wi • p S w`'wS
~i. Rv t a tA/ 'elL
Water District Signature/Tit{e Date
COUN?Y ENGINEER
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have .
been discussed with the applicant. ~
e--- L
A. Comments f/d D~ 4U-1
~
Signature/Title DaKe
.
COUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of thts proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is„'v,n)
A Comments . ~
,
~
Sign ture/jOe Dafe ~
REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) een s tisfiedaun ~ ~
t
A Comments
e /Title e ~ Date
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant.
A. Comments , Alvle~
~ i
te ~
Sign ture y
-
ZONE RECLASSIFICAT~~,q APPLICAT1ON * 1 PAGE 4 of 4
PAFiT II I
VVA~~,~~
'1RVifEYOf\ p VER+ 1riClY *TNF~-yLi
SU
N ~ ~ ~F+ •
• ■
.
I, the undersigned, alicensed land sunveyar, have completed the information re 4 for t ~
zonmg map d ,..frjtten aegal descriptian is~~,~ i:" ~
~.~~.o
~ i~r
Signed Date
-
Address 7,17 C.-o• 7-44 2ao , Phone ~56f-
City State Z-cllq Ztp
PART 1V
SIGNATLlRE OF PRQQEFtTY OWNERS OR LETTEFt OF AUTHORlZATIDfd
l, the undersigned, sweat' ar afifirrrt under penalty of perjury that the abdve respanses are made
truthfully and ta fhe best of my knowledge.
I further swear or aff rrn that i am the owner of record of'the area propcseti for the prevlously
identifie ad~s~ a#ian, Ti ~uvner, attached herev,rith is written permission frc~m the
c~tinrr~er utho, izir acti e; be'ha lf
Signed 04 ~ Date c c)
Address .0 , Box 18708 Phone 466.--8900 .
Ci spokan State WA Zip 19208-0708
I r-)~ . l-
s ure af applicant or represenxative Date - ~
S te vf 1,+'Vashingtun ~
} ss.
County of Spokane
S'qned and sworn ar affirrned b fore me ara khis day of 19
by C' • ~ Lo c-L
r
I~o'Ldry Sea!
Notary Public in and for the Stake of lFlfashington residing
at
~
7AJ~W
N1y appointment expir~s -7-1
PART V
,
7D BE COMPL.ETED BY THE QIV1S14M OF BUILi]1NG AND PLANNING
Date submitted Fite nurnber
Date accepted ~ ~17 By ~
Tatal fees ~6
Rece~ t nurr~ber
~
PRU W£Z6PtlE APfY 15.15 4-47
~
DIVCON PROPERTY
EUCLID ROAD REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
May 21, 1998
The North 53 1/3 rods of the NW'/4 of the NWl/a of Section 10, T.25 N., R44 E., W.M.
in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
EXCEPT the East 330.00 of said NW'/4 of the NWt/a;
AND EXCEPT County Road right of way;
AND EXCEPT the South 26 2/3 rods of the West 30 rod of said NW'/a of the NW%4.
TOGETHER with the North 300.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of the East 330.00 feet of
the W'/2 of the NWl/a of said section
. ~lG 4` •r f O .
li'A1 p~
. r • ,~s1
. y •
.
.
.
•e .
O Oq~
.
t8ost •
. ~~►,q L'L'AND
EXPIAE3 12 08 ~
N V . o
•
r •
. . .
- ° SPOKANE COUNTY DlV1SION OF 6UILDING AND PLANN{NG
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL 1NFORMATION
,
LegalOwner JOhTl. Mi11er, T.nmhPr Yarc3 TnvPstmpnfig, _,T-~T.(` ((7Z fiinn t0
purchase)
Mailing Address P. O. Box 18 7 0 8
City Spokane State wA Zip Code 9 9 2 0 8- 0 7 0$
Phone 4 6 6- 8 9 0 0 (Work) (Home) _ Fax 4 6 6- 8 91 6
Applicant/AgenQUMber Xard Tnvestments, LLC c Associate-5, 7nc.
Mailing Address 25 South Altamont
City Spokane State wA Zip Code 9 9 2 0 2
Phone 5 3 4- 8 0 8 6 (Work) (Home) Fax 5 3 4- 81 5 9
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, {NCLUDE WRIT7EN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
Projectiproposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) 1 5+-
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft ) None
Assessor's parcel numbers of project/proposaf 4 51 0 2. 9 0 0 8, P tn , o f 4 51 0 5. 9 0 7 2
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled N/A
/
Street address of proposal East 12300 Block of Euclid Avenue
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR - 3. 5 ( 1 5 a c) & RR -1 0( 0. 4 a c (1991)
Existing use of propertyaqriculture 7, o;?a s;.rnR1e f3miJ y residence w/ out
Proposed zoning Industrial Park ( I-1 ) buildings
Comprehensive plan cateyory Urban & Rural School district East Valley
Water purveyor Irvin Fire district # 1
Proposed use of property:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes t ) Business Industnal (X) Mixed use
Other - Describe offices and liqht industrial research & development
List previous planning division actions involving this property None known
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATlON
. Location of proposal Southeast corner of Pines Rd. & Euclid Avenue
Section 10 Township 2 5 Range 4 4
Name of public road(s) providing access Euclid Avenue & Pines Road
Width of property fronting on public road 1, 0 2 0 f t.
. . w .
ZONE RECLASSIFIGATION APPI.ICATION PAGE 2 Of 4
.
Does the proposai have access to an arterial or planned arteria!? Yes No
Name(s) of arterial roads Pines Road (State Hwy. 27)
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposed See44 attached
leqal description - Al1 one parcel
Existing zone(s) UR- 3. 5 & RR-1 0 to proposed zone(s) I - 1
for the following described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below. See attached
legal description '
if you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it? applicant has option
to purchase the property from the owner.
~
y
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
Propertv to the north is zoned I-2, property to the east is propsed
for rezone to B-2, property to southwest is UR-22 but developed for
offices, road improvements are proqramed for Pines Road, Euclid Road
is proposed for a minor arterial.
What impacQ will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
No siqnificant impact on adaacent properties. The applicant has
met with adjacent property owners
What factors support the zone rec{assification? Other zoning and land uses planned for
the immediate area. The only adjacent residential is planned multi
family to the south. Appropriate separation is provided via topograph3
and landscapina in the I-1 zone. Direct site access is provided
via Pines Road and Euclid.
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use'?
Surroundinc land uses are compatible. The URBAN land use category
suAAOrts I-1 zoninct and the I-1 zone has qreater setback, landscaping;
screeninq and use restrictions to provide compatibility in the URBAN
area. The conceptual sYte plan shows proposed buildinqs, setbacks
access, landscapinq, etc. .
ZONE RECLASSIFIGAfi{ON APPIiCATION Y.~., PAGE 3 of 4
. ~
PART II
This section of the appiication wili provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies dentifed
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposal bere final submittal
to the Division.
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A. This proposal is within Fire Protection District No ~
B. Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providcng for an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes.
C. Recommended fire flow T~3i ; or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive; and will be determined at time of building permit application
D. Requirements include /1
C. l p0•'~i . le:5-i 6-10-s6
Fire District. S e/Title Date
WATER PURVEYOR
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements (have '(have not
been made.
B. Requirements/comments OampevrL
,
S.c.~ 1v~ Ltia~ eajaa LpA;► .
U /cl
Water District Signature/Title ~ Date
COUNTY ENGINEER
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed with the applicant %
A Comments
~ .
r. .
Signature/Title D e
COUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied The designated water purveyor for this site is
A. Comments .
Signature/Title Date
REGIQNAL HEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) een s Lisfied
~
A. Comments
"
• urelTitle Date
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant.
A. Comments
Signature/Title Date
. _ '
' - • .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' PaGE 4 of 4
PART III ~.1G:~• :j j.'~•`~
AS/fi~SC
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
. 0
. .
I, the undersigned, a licensed land surveyor, have completLd the information re ~ for t ;
. .
zoning map dtten legal description o'•, 180~1 o~
Si9ned ~ 9 Date 619/l~8
Address 7157 G(J. 7`1~4 ZQo Phone y5~
City State ZX1,4 Zip
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
i further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identifie a d use a tion, W18708 t t e wner, attached herewith is wntten permission from the
owner utho, izir~ n acti hi / e behalf.
Signed ✓t/~ Date 10 Address .0. Box Phone 466-8900
v
~ Spokane,~, State WA Zip 99208-0708
~
1 9C?°. ,
S' ure of applicant or representative Date ~
S ~ te of Washington )
) ss:
County of Spokane )
S•"gAed -And sworn or affirmed b fore me on this ~ C) day of 19 ~
V
b y. /Ll. Lc)Lt f Q,r 4-
NO'tary`Seal
- - Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing
at
My appointment expires
PART V
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
Date submitted File number
Date accepted By
Total fees Receipt number
PREt (IEIONE MPl KJS L97
RECEIPT SUMt'IARY
~ -
♦ - TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9800978 DATE: 06/12/98
APPLICANT: LUMBER YARD INVESTME PHONE=
ADDRESS: 10220 N NEVADA #60
SPOKANE WA 99218
CONTACT NAME: LUMBER YARD INVESTME PHONE= 509 466 8900
TRANSACTION: RE-ZONE (ENGINEERS & UTLILTIES)
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS: PARCEL N0.45102.9008 & 45105.9072
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 100.00
y'
TOTAL DUE = 300.00
TOTAL PAID= 300.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
06/12/98 00006186 1089 300.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
~*****,t****~*********,r**~*****~* TFiANK YOU *~*,r******~***~~******~*******~****~
~
. .
, PERMIT CENTER EAA pA-SSPORT
r f
Date Number:
I L/
Name Phone
Address
~
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING
7c?
. ; . - . _
'~Division of Buildin~,~&;~Elanriin~x ~~ivisi_oii~ufEn~~io''eeVn&5Ffi;<.;?~1:x
,~•y , , ~ ~ •e i~:E~
~ Addressing Permit Review Approach Permit
Building Permit Shorelmes Info. Flood Piain Permit
Code Information Short Plat [nfo. Public/Private Roads
~ Commercial Review Subdirnsion Info. Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
Confcrence Temp Use Permit Site Qrainage Info.
~ Fire Safety Review Variance Appl. Subdivision Review
~ Manufactured Home Zone Check Utility Perrnit
Mechamcal Permits Zone Info. • rZone Change Review
,
~ Plumbing Permits
~ Private Road Info. F--j ND FEE REQUIRED ~
ec Timz Out
- Residential R,eview
U(JJ
Sewer Permits
~ I~` ~'~~~~,~!V~'~~~^,l~[O~f ~,~.~11~W ~.::r: :s,.:~~t.•:~'~
~ information Subdivision R,eview
~ Admin Facception UUDlSewer Info.
- Binding Site Plan Info Zone Change Review
~ Cert Of Exemption
~ Comprehensive Plan NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewer Time Out
i Cond Use Pernut I ~
~ Cntical Areas Info. ~ ~ .~~s-a ; • ~ -
;J.;r.~
a Nonconforming Use
NO FEE 12BQUIRED NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewer Timc Out Reviewer Time Out Reviewer Time Out
I I I I I I
~
• 4 ' •
PERMIT CENTER EAST FEE SCHEDLrLE~ I#~C,~Ila~'IRIl~L31tr1~A7`~lQN '
a1u1$r0t14 or• uuiLQ;rsr,, & TRA~VsACrro~r d: .
+SEQ] q UN[TS ICOST I DESCRIPTION OF WORH ~ ~ ,
281 I $60 ICcnificxce of Cxempuon ~ Pro-1978 ~
291 I $90 I ~ IIetween S at 10 Acra PWLWOT. ' . • .
301 I $901 lMenor Lot i.inc Adjustment . •
311 I $78 1 . _ I AllOchers COMMENTS
791 I $60 Conduional Use Permics - Renewal i All BUILDING b PLANNING
801 I $404 Gonduional Use Permus ~ All
B36I ~ $75 IEnvironmencal Checklist I
601 I $72 IHome Profession Permit I
1371 I $36 IPre-Conference Fce - Condiaonal Use, iTemponry Use, Vanance
611 I $269 ITemponry Ust Pcrmit I
731 I $638 IVanance - Before or After Constn►aion I
#1n'I91oN A~ ENC;ILVMITNG` • . . ENClNEER'S
I I $30 IAdminiscrative Vanancc I E01
E021 I $SOIAppeals ~
- pidj . . . . . . 52EI /1ppr0gh- . • ~ ~sPPM~ - ~
~Oa ~CL~f . - ' • _ . . - - . . •~~'tt~iiit' ' -
EOSI 1 $50 IChange of Conditions I Plat
E061 I $SO I I Zoae
E071 I $SO IConduional Uu I
E261 I 130 IDaign Deviacton I
E241 I $75 IEnvironmencal Checklut
• E08I • I tiff Ioloc-d 0141n . _ . . . " . . . . . . . . tsspecud . . . '
' - -:4Q~~ . . . . . . ~,~~a.I : • . • • . • • . . - - . ' ,
. - ~38I - - ~~4ti~i:~$~fat:trt~:9oii~~- : . . . . . . . . • . - . . _ . . ; - ~
. : . - - - - - - . . .tX4~-~ - - . . . y: • - . . . . . . . E'u~+~a;'~. . .
- -~~oi - - : ~ • i~~~ - - . . . . . . - '~a~:v~~:~._.~.~~ .
~ - ' • ~3f~: . . . ' 17~:;: . .
- - - - . . •
%
%
' . . . . : ~ . , = ~cintlst~a~ly ~S~~rtii~::-~''':'~:'=~-:`:::'~=:•~;'•'-: : . . . , . , , . . . , .
ElOI I S200 (Preliminary Biading Site Plan
El l l I $200 lPrdimiaary P}au I Long
E121 $100 ! ~ Short
E231 I $1001 , Fina!
W. .
~i~R1~F=•--•-- - - •
• ~ ~~R ~ .~14 ~GoaScrutt~on ~f~ct:~:.L~~c d~'~x~ : . . . • • . . ~ . • . ~ . ' • - .
E151 I $SOIVariance ~
. ' .~36 . . • ~14lQ_!E ~Ot~C IA Rt&~t~-'~ii~:••'='"'==: - • • • - • '
- .~P~Pi ~4Q '~l~E4~If'~S~tf'':='=' . . . ' . - • .
- - . . . . . . . . • ,
E17 5200IZoniag Permu
E25 ( 1 $ 10 INSF Chuge
E281 I IMisc. Road Fund (f Amc) ,
E30 I IA4isc. Const in County RW(S Amt) I
E311 I iHamrd Road M,ugaaon ,
p,Nl,S~~tq Ot~ U'~IE.IF]~ - - - - . . . _ ; • - _ - . : : . UTILITIES
U01I 5100 IPlanning Acctons With►n che PSSA I
U021 I $25 iPlanning Attions Ouuidt che PSSA (
LCAftVEft/f0RA/5/1'A5SP0RI 6CK (4/141991
I
~
e
. RECEIVED
BEFORE AUG 2 0 1998
THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEEH
IN TI-IE MATTER OF SHORT ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
PL:XT NO. SP-1188-98 ) CONCLUS YnNS A ?V1)
~ nFCTSIONTlltS MAT1 Eit, an application for subdivision of land Crom Barbara Richards has
received and was ciecided Ul}oll, j~ur~~.~;IIlI tt~ <"'c,mitV 20th day of Augu~t, 1998,
F Iti'llIN(7:ti ()I' F:tCT A.\ 1) ('()ti`C'I,l'S f()'ti
;i1~,I1111~ ILiti U~CI1 ~~~~,~~erly i`yat~~i I'~ti~~UIiSI:I11}' Ic~I'
~ . -
the decision by the Director of Spokane County Division of Building and Plannin-~,.
2. The proposal is to divide approxunately 15.11 acres into 4 lots for those uses rer>>,:: ~L~~-
t he existing Ur ban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 ( R R-1 ~ , :
3. The proposal is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Eucliu
Pines Road in the NW~/a of Sectinn 10, Townshir 25 North, Range 44 East WA1 .
Spokane County, Washington.
4. The existing zoning of the propcrt}' dcsCs-ibc:Li iiI the aJ)giiLatiUn iS UI'L'•all
(UR-3.5) and Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), which were established in 1991. The muc`::
larger portion of the subject property is located in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3. "
zone. Approximately 15,000 square feet of the subject property in proposed lot 4i
zoned Rural Residential-10 (RR-10). This apparent anomaly will be corrected by tl
concurrent zone reclassification. (see file # ZE-5-98) Pursuant to Revised Code
Washington (RCW) 58.17.195, this proposal conforms to the requirements of t}ie
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and IZural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone
1
5. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan deslgnates this area as Urbail aiid IZur-al. 1 i.
development and uses, as proposed and conditioned, are in compliance with the,
categories.
6. Surrounding uses are undeveloped to the east and north, Trent Elementary School is
located to the west, and commercial offices are located to the south.
7. The proposed site is located within the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA). The
Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Route 19 along Pines Road provides connecting
services to the site.
8. The proposed shorc plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal
will be as authorized by the Director of Spokane County Division of Utilities.
9. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies havine a potential
interest in the project were notified and recommend.:
10. Recognizing tlie recommended conditions and Spoi~:~~~c cuunty
the proposed short plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety aiiu
general welfare and ihat the public use and interest will be served by platting the
subdivision.
11. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the Cour
subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safet}► and general welfare
accordance witf; standards established by the State and Spokane County. The Coun?.,
Division of Building and Planning has considered the nrovision of adequatc nllhli,facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically:
12.
a. open spaces f. sanitary waste ciispoS:i!
b. drainage ways g. parks and recreation facilitio. _
c. public and/or private right-of-ways h. playgrounds
d. transit i. schools and school groum.;
e. potable xNrater j. sidewalks
,
13. The project is eYempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Policy
Act pursuant to WAC 197-11-500 (6) (a).
14. The East Valley 5chool District Iv`o, 361 has co►iiciieiited on tlie proposed Sllort Plat. Tlie
District has indicated that it is concerned about the safety of students walking fracli tile
development to the Trent Elementary School. 'I'he school district recommends eitller a
%valkine overPass across Pincs Road of a traffic signal to insure the safetN• of studcnts.
D£:C1SiU'V
Qased upon the above noted Findings of Fact and LoI1CIUS10I1S, Sliort Plat Apl)l1CallOI1
SP- i I 88-98 is hereby APPROVED for f ve (5) years, specifically to September 1, 2003 alid
subject to eonditions noted below. This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistcilt
with adopted appeal procedures.
CONI)ITInNS OI' :1PPltOVAL
:`\Il Illt', heIo„' C11I1d1IIOIlS Illll)U>ed Sh<Ill bt.'. E)lndlilg Oll ti1C "APP11Cm11,., w111CI1 1erlll sliall Illcjll(lt'
thc owncr or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
I. The proposal shall conlply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UIZ-3.5) atid Rural
Residential-10 (ItR-10) zones and otller applicable Zoning Code chapters, as amended.
2. The final short plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary
plat of record. No increase of density or numher of tracts shall occtir wit}IOUt a cliarlge oi-
condition application submittal and approval.
3. The preliminary stlort ptat is given conditioilal appruval ior tive (5) years, speeificall~~ L,-,
September l, 2003. The applicant may submit an extension of time applicatio»
approximately tliirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date. Application(s) fvi-
-.~xtension of time shall be processed under the provisions of i nn
(Extension of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
. I'rior to filing the final short piat, the applicant shall submit to the Building and Planning Director/designee for review any proposed final short plats to
ensure compliancc with thcse Findings aIld CUI1Ll1tl011S Uf Appruval.
A survc.•v i~ i'C'Cji11R:(l Ofthc: S11bjc:i:I ()I"UEl::I"Iy Mric}r to filin` tlic titial sliort p1at.
t;. A}iprupriate i-oad Ilailies zind street uddresses sliall be iiidicated on the final short plat
i. A I~propriaie utility easements shall be indicated on the final short plat map. Approval ~f
iitility easemenis by utiliiy companies must be received prior to filing the final short plat.
S. The cieciication sliall contZin the following statement:
o. "Setbacks sliall be deteriziincd al lI1e tllllc', building peniiits are requested unless thc:se
setbacks are specifically drafted on this final short plat. The setbacks indicated oi1
this subdivision may be varied from if proper zoning or variance approvals are
obtained."
10. Toilr (4) current Certif icates of Titie sliall be fl1CIllSlltd tu thc Count\' lli%-isic►n of
Building and Planning prior to filiiig the final short plat.
11. Tlze Spokarle Coutlty Division af Building ailci Ylwvling shall prepare aiid recorcl willi tlle
Spokane County Auditor a"Title Notice" noting that tlie property in question is subject to
a variety of speciat conditions imposed as a result of approval of a Iand use action. This
"Title Notice" shall serve as official public notice regarding conditions of approvai
affecting the property in question. The "Title Notice" shall be recorded within fiftcen
(15) days of final disposition of the approved land use action and shall only be
extinguished by the Spokane COUi]ty DtVIStOtl of Building aticl F'lanning. T11e "Z'itlc
Notice" shall generally provide as fotlows:
Z-Iie parce( of propertv le(mIl~~ descrihe(l as (1«;al dcscri1-)tion mid tcix p.ircel illliilbc1'} i;
and 1):ciS1011 c) f 6
.
~
.
the subject of a land use actioii, II11pOS1I1~,' a variety Ot SpCClal dLVCIUpII1C',Ill CUI1d1l1UIlS, bk'
a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Off cial on (date) and as maybe
amended, altered or supplemented by official action or as already changed. File No.
(County Division of Building and Planning File Number) is availahle for inspection ano-i
c:;-~pyinp in the 'SI,nkane Cnunty Division of Ruildinganci F'larlcling.
SI'UKANE COUNTY DIVISION UF ENGINEL+'IZING ANll 1ZOADS
1. That conditional approvat of the plat by the County Engineer is 6iven subject to
dedieation of rip_ht-of-\vavand approva1 of the mad system as indieated in the preliminary
plat of record.
2. Road plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to Cowlty standards shawinl-I
proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer t'Ol-
acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of a final pl.lt; r-nacl plans to bc prcpnrc~l
Wlder ih` clir-; ctioil of n licemccl Pro,fessional rivil T'n(_,irleer.
i. I):a1i1~1,~;C pI:111S aIld c,CSiL',11 C.i1CL11t1L1~~I15 S~lO~\'1RL ille ~lllS!I1111ei1I ~lI C1I':11I1~?gc: t~lclll(lcS ~)e
submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing oi'
the final plat. Drainage plans to be prep.3recl «ncier the clireetion oi' a liccns<<i
Professional Civil En,',inCr.
4. Construction within I;uclid AVCIlUt' Riglit ot' W:iy 5ha11 be pc:rf'Orilied uiider tlic, ciir«t
supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer witli
"Record Drawings" and ceriification which states the followins, "I have reviewed the
construction and to my knowledge find it to be in substantial conformance with approved
certified plans and Standard Specifications except as nated."
5. No construction work is to be performed within the existinb ur proposed 1'ubiic right-ol-
way until plans have been accepted by the County Engineer and a permit has been issu~ ~
hy the Cotinty Fneineer. !111 «~nrk is stihject to inspcction and aPProval hv the
Engineer ~
C. All constructiun „!itliin tlIC eX15[!!lb UI" pt'OpUSc'U l'ublic right-uf-%vay is to bc; c;uiliPieir: :
prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of irnprovements. Construction certification, "Record
Drativings" and monumentation of the street centerlines shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
7. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system.
8. This proposal is adjacent to SR-27. Any required access permits or improvements to SR-
27 must be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
9. Dedication of 7 feet of right-of-way along Euclid Avenue.
10. The applicant shall grant applicable horder easements ad,jacent to Spokane Countv P"
of Way per Spokanc Count-v : .
11. The County Engineer has cic5;u1i~:i~~~ i~,Liilu ;Ii1iuI, :t:ik.'
improvement of Euclid Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This Nvi!'.
require varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Th(~
construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required.
12. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal
acceptabte to the State Higliway Department of the proposed State Highway-Count),
Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be
received prior to the fillins of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are the
responsibility of the sponsor and may either betconstructed or a bond to cover the cost o!'
such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as deterrnincd by County Engineer and the State Highway Departmenc.
13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standarus sc;i lOCill li1 5pUkJIlc; Lounty Bua, d
of Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498, as amended, which estahlishes repulationq t'(~r
roads. apt?ro-ziches, drainngc and fees in ncw constrtictior;.
~
rinciinvs and Decisiocl SP-l 1s8-99 3 of'.
~
~ y
14. The Cvurity Engineer llas exainicled this devclopmetit proposal ailci has cieterminc:d that
the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the
dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
15. Tlie applicant sliould bc advised that tliere may exist utilities cither underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside
future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments
or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable
utilities and Spokane County EnIIineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustmeitt or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any
necessary work.
16. Tllere is a pending zoiie change application being processed on the subject parcel. The
applicant is advised that additional comnients will be provided to the Division of
Building and Planning when that application is circulated for comment.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIE S
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide I'ublic Sewer System is to be constructed.
Sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical
and or estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection perniit in order to
establish sewer fees.
2. The dedication shall state: Public sewers shall be constructed to provide for the
connection of each parcel to the County's system of sewerage. Uses on properties within
the project shall be required to connect to the sewer and pay applicable charges per the
Couiity Sewer Ordinance. Sewer connection nerrliits shall be required.
3. The dedication shall state: A public sewer system will be made available for tlle plat, atid
individual services will be provided to cacli lot iiriur to sale. Usc of iildividual 011-5ttt
disposal svstems shall not be authorizccl.
4. "I'he dedication shall state: Indiviclual tracts shall bc subject to paymcnt of current
applicable sewer connection charges and/or general facilities charges prior to the issuance
of a sewer connection permit.
5. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilitics "under separate
cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specificatioils for the ptiblic
sewer connections facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments sliall
submit historical and or estimated water usage as part of ttie sewer plan submittal.
6. Sewer pla.as acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the
finalization of the project.
7. Side sewer easement with a width acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be shown
on the face of the plat as "Sewer and Utilities Easement".
8. The dedication shall state: Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must
be made prior to issuauice of sewer connection perniit. Sewer cliarges may includc
special connection charges and general facilities cliarges. C}larges izla}' be substantial
depending upon the nature of the developmciit.
9. Any water service far this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plaii for Spokaiie County, as amended.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the prelitiiinary pIat of
record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane
County Engineer, and the Spokane Regional Healtli District. Written approval of the
easements by thc utility companies shall bc reccivcd prior to thc submittal of the final
plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane ~
F1I1CIlIlgS 1I1CI DCCISIOI] SP-1 I S8-9g 4 o(' 6
. . ~
r
C.'otlnly.
4. Water service shall be cuurdinated through tlle Director of Utilities, Spokwie County.
S. Water service shall be by an existins public water supply when approved by the Rcbional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of tfle
Spokane Regional Health District that an adequate and potable xvater supply is available
to each tract of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plrit lies within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use, and lire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The healtll
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and the fire protection district will certify, prior to
tlle filing of the final plant, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance
«rith their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water
plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plant on a copy of said water plan
that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsar fi~r
constructian of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application far
building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangement will include a provision
holding Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District, and the purveyor harnlless
from claims by any tract purcliaser refused a building permit due to failure of thc pLat
sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
10. A public sewer system witl be made available for the plat and individual service w•ill be
provided to each tract prior to sale. tlse of individual on-site se«-age disposal systems
shall not be authorizeci.
11. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system
will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each tract
prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposai systems shall not be authorized."
1
12. The dedicatory language on the plat shail state: "Use of private wells and water systems
is prohibited."
13. The final plat dedication shall contaiii the following statement: "The public water
system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the
local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department and water purveyor,
shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual
domestic water service as well as fire protection to each tract prior to sale of each tract ~
and prior to issuance of a building pernlit for each tract."
SPOKANE COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
1. Annexation of the subject property into the corporate limits of the Irvin Water District
will require filing a Notice of Intention and approval by the Boundary Review Board.
SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1
1. The Spokane County Fire District requires the installation of two new fire hydrants. One
hydrant is required at the southeast corner of Euclid Avenue and Pines Road and a second
hydraiit is required to be located between tracts 2 and 3 on Euclid Avenue. A firc•
apparatus turnaround far individual lots may be reqtiired at the time when buildiil~
permits are requested.
Finclinus and Decision SP-11 89-99 5 of 6
~
~
' I
Approved this 20''' day of August, 1998.
1
~ Louis Webster, AICP
Associate Planner
[Pursuant to ESHB-1724 and the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 96-
0293, tliis ciocument is also considered the NOTICE OF DECISION.] Under State Law
and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal tllis decision to the Spokane County
Hearing Examiner. If you desire to fite an appeal, you must submit tlle appropriate Appeal
Application together witli the required Fee, payable to the Spokane County Division of
Building and Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is
signed. Upon receipt of a complete appeal application, a public hearing will be schedulcd.
If you havc any questions, plcasc call thc Division of Building aiid Planning at 477-3675. I
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Itoads
Spokane County Division of Utilities
Spokane Regional Health District
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
East Valley School District No. 361
Irvin Water District
Barbara Richards, Applicant
Inland Pacific Engineering, Surveyor
~
,
Findings and Decision SP-1188-98 6 of 6
!7 l _ ,
' RECEIVED
~
N OY 0 6 1998
I N LA N D P A C I F I C E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
November f, 1998
W.O. 98425
Planning
Mr. Greg Figg
WSDOT, Eastern Region
2714 North Mayfair Street
Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Re: Pinecroft Business Center, Pines & Euciid
Bond Amount for Widcning on Pines Road
Dear Grzg:
The owner desires to obtain a bond for tile construction work to widen Pines Road at Euclid
Avenue for the Pinecroft Business Center. This bond amount is to be based on the intersectioil
plan for approval submitted on November 5, 1998 and covers widening to the radius returns at tlie
Euclid Avenue intersection and at the roadway approach for the Pinecroft Business Center. Also
included is the relocation of the driveway opposite Euclid Avenue on the west side of Pines Road
for the school.
The estimate for this work is $61,400. The owner is anxious to come to an agreement on the bond
so that the permitting process can proceed. The bond for the signal will be a separate bond and
is not included in this estimate. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this project, please do not hesitate to give us a
call.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc.
Y _ 14"
~
Timothy A. Schwab P.E.
TAS/tas
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineering
John Miller, Divcon
File
'O' West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Urive • Suite 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814
'>01'.4584,84f1, • FAX: ;09-451i 681.; 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277
^
,
~ ~ ' 2 S
Washington State Eastern Region
Department of Transportation 27 1 ~ N. May~air sc«e,
,
Sid Morrtson Spokane, WA 39207-2090
SP.,r?'ary c` Transporta?,on (r,il4) 324_t_rr,0
November 03, 1998
Mr. Tim Schwab
Inland Pacific Engineering
West 707 7`h, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Re: Pinecroft Business Center
Intersection Plan for Approval
(File # 027-87-08)
Dear Tim,
The Washin~ton State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has reviewed the revised
October 23 intersection plan for the above development. We ask that the following
changes be made to this plan before a mylar copy is submitted for our approval:
1. At the southern property edge (approximate station 4613+00) the 10 foot lane depicted
in this transition area will need to be increased to 11 feet. We suggest the sidewalk
width in this immed.iate area be decreased to 4.4 feet to allow this lane width to be
increased. A detail of this section will also need to be shown on the plan sheet.
2. The private access point to Pines Road is adequate with 30 foot radiuses to
accommodate a passenger vehicle. If it is desired to have deliveries or trucks using
this access point the radiuses will need to be increased to 35 feet to accommodate
single unit trucks.
3. To accommodate a shared access point for both the East Trent Elementary and the
Wes Crosby site as presently shown on the plan, the 30 foot radiuses will need to be
increased to 35 feet. If it is determined that this driveway cannot be shared, a modified
design will need to be submitted depicting access only to the school. Divcon will be
responsible for the cost to establish an access to East Trent Elementary opposite Euclid
Road. Divcon will not be responsible, however, for any additional costs incurred to
make this a shared access with Wes Crosby.
If you should have any questions regarding the above please feel free to contact me at 324-
6199.
Sincerely,
Greg Figg
Transportation Planner
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
Max Patterson, WSDOT Design
Ted Trepanier, WSDOT Traffic
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. FIECIFIVED
October 23, 1998 OCr 1 6 "
WKANE COUMy ENGIHEM
W.O. 98425
Planning .
Mr. Greg Figg
WSDOT, Eastern Region
2714 North Mayfair Street
Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Re: Pinecroft Business Center, Pines & Euclid
Submittal of Intersection Plan for Approval for Widening on SR 27 at Euclid
Dear Greg:
Enclosed are five sets of the intersection plan for approval for the widening of Pines Road (SR 27)
at the Euclid Avenue intersection for both northbound and southbound left turn lanes. These plans
have been revised per WSDOT comments as discussed in a meeting with you on October 22,
1998 and from written comments and "redlines". Please review this revised plan for approval at
your earliest convenience.
Also enclosed is a copy of level of service and queue analysis calculations for the Pines
Road/Euclid Ave. intersection. The traffic volumes used include Maribeau Point at buildout (year
2006), Pinecroft, 60 units of Mobil Home for Wes Crosby's land and au estimated amount for the
school. The queue analysis shows that 50 feet of storage for the northbound lane is adequate.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this project, please do not hesitate to give us a
call.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc.
~~-Sm,
Timo y A. Schwab P.E.
TAS/tas
Enclosures
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineering
John Miller, Divcon
File
707 West 71h • Suiie 100 ZUIU lakewucxl Urive • Suite 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'nlene, ID 83814
509-458-6840 • F/1X: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • fAX: 208-769-7277
Euclid Avenue & Pines Road
2046 Traffic with Mirabeau, P[necroft & Croby Mobile Homc 1 Q/?2~ 1998
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
LO ~ L4 y o' I
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT 1413R SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configuradons
Satd. Flow (prot) I 770 11596 0I 770 t1583 0I 770 3696 01770 3~14 0
Fit PeRn. 0.211 0.886 0.950 0.950
Satd. Ftow (perm) 393 1596 0 1650 1583 0 1770 3696 0 1770 3714 0
Volume (vph) 14 1 19 196 ' 1 295 25 1169 66 228 874 16
Confl. Peds. (#!hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Growth Factor 100°/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Heavy Vehicles 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr)
Mid-Block Traffic 0% 0% 0% 0%
Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 21 0 206 312 0 26 1365 0 240 984 0
Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Prot
Phase Number 2 6 3 8 7 4
Maximum Split (s) 22 22 13 35 18 40
Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
g/c Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.43 0.20 0.49
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 100 404 418 401 236 1577 354 1832
V/C Ratio 0.15 0.05 0.49 0.78 0.11 0.87 0.68 0.54
V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.14
V/S Rabo Perm 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.20 0.37 0.26
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16.5 16.1 18.1 19.8 21.7 14.8 21.1 9.9
Actuated G/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.43 0.20 0.60
Actuated V/C Ratio 0.15 0.05 0.50 0.79 0.29 0.87 0.69 0.44
Percentile St Delay 17.0 16.3 17.9 25.1 23.7 17.0 22.5 7.0
Percentile LOS C C C D C C C B
Cycle Length: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Lost Time: 9 •
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70
Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Percentile Stopped Delay: 15.2
Intersection Percentile LOS: C
Splits and Phases: Euclid Avenue 8 Plnes Road
2 3 a .
, -
r t3
Synchro Repon
Inland Pacific Engineering Page I
i
,
Euclid Avenue & Pines Road
2006 Traffic with Mu-abeau, Pinecroft & Croby Mobile Home 10/22/1998
Queues
--I ri TLi
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 21 206 312 26 1365 240 984
Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 7 82 135 13 278 104 88
Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 24 145 #258 33 #378 #195 199
Link Length (ft) 1264 1824 1159 985
50th Up Block Time % ~
95th Up Block Time %
Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 50 200
50th Bay Block Time % 34% 50% 49%
95th Bay Block Time % 52% 62% 51 % 6% 8%
Queuing Penalty (veh) 133 115 13 14 9
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles
,
Synchro Report
Intand Pacific Engineering Page 1
~ L /0 z S y ~
~
• z-
~
Washington State Eastern Region
Department of Twansportatmon 2714 N Mayfair Street
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation (509) 3246000
March 15, 1999
Mr. Tom Crouch
Director, Business Services
East Valley School District No. 361
12325 East Grace
Spokane, WA 99216 '
Re: Pines Road and Euclid Ave.
Widening
Dear Mr. Crouch
In a phone conversation with Greg Figg of my office regarding the above intersection
widening project, the following is our estimate of work which the various parties will be
responsible for:
Divcon Inc.- Construction of Pines Road Improvements to back of radius on East Trent
Elementary's site. This includes: curbing, paving, sidewalk re-construction, signal poles,
signal controller, misc. signal equipment, fire hydrant re-location, etc.
_ East Valley School District- From back of the radius to the end of project on the East
Trent Elementary Site. This includes: curbing, small quantity of paving, striping,
landscape modification, and on site signage. Additionally we will need to execute the
following agreements with the School District: signal equipment easement, and a
construction easement.
Wes Crosby- Will need to provide the following: Relocation of the two Avista (WWP)
Power Poles just south of the existing school access point. Additionally, Mr. Crosby will
need to provide the following agreements: signal equipment easement and construction
easement to WSDOT, and an agreement with the school for joint use of the school
property for access.
Based on the above mentioned work that East Valley School District would be responsible
for and the limited quantities of material involved, it is our recommendation that East
Valley School District work through Divcon Inc. representative Tim Schwab at Inland
Pacific Engineering (IPE) to determine a cost for this work. We believe that an agreement
to have this work constructed by Divcon Inc. with the rest of their contract would be the
most economical way to accomplish this work. Tim Schwab of IPE should be able to
assist you in facilitating this agreement. •
• - .
Mr. Crouch
Mazch 15, 1999 F;;~;„► t J t--
Page 2 ~
MAR 1 7 Wk'~
~
In recent days right of way issues which had arisen on the east side of Pines that have
delayed us have been resolved allowing this project to proceed. If there is anything else
we can provide you to help expedite process please feel free to contact me at 324-6197
and I will personally see that you get the requested information as quick as possible.
Thank you again for cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
.
.
Martin Wilson, P.E.
Development Services Fngineer
~
M W; ..f
cc: Tim Schwab, Inland Pacifie Engineering
Wes Crosby, Property Owner
Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
Keith Meicalf, WSDOT Project Development
Linda Anderson, WSDOT Real Estate Services
Project File, 027-087-08
~
WaSh1ngton Stete Ea;tem Re91on
Departmeitt of 7'rans~1'tBtlOf1 2714 N. Mayfafr StrEet
,
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-21D9,..
Secreta,y ol Transportation (509) 324-6000
April 7, 1999
Mr. John Miller
Divcon Inc.
P.O. Box 18708 `
Spokane, VVA 9920R
Re: Divcon Pines and Euclid
Development
Dear Mr. Miller:
This letter is in response to the concerns you had expressed regarding your pending short
plat and the dedications/easements we requested be provided prior to the recording of the
/ short plat. These easements and dedications of property are necessary for the widening of
Pines Road for a lefc turn lane at the Pines and Euclid Intersection along '
U;aWwmei al as required through the conditions of approvai placed on this p'ect (ZE-S-
98) thro Spokaae County Building and Planning. Providing this property n
e easements is a necessary step in meeting the conditions of approval on this project.
e
These requirements are not required from the traffic generated by the short plat, but rather
from the traffic the development of this property will create. The short plat process
provides a means to ensure that the needed dedication and easements necessary to fulfill
the cond.itions of approval are provided before any property separation occurs.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 324-6197.
Sincerely,
ivIARTIN WILSON, PE
Development Services Engineer
GF:
cc: Scott Engelhard, Spokane County Engineers
Tim Schwab, Inland Pacific Engineering
. .
A(.IG 1 1~1 1991
Washington State Eastern Region ~ Department of 'iYansportation 2714 N. Maytair Street
,
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090 I
SecrEtary of Transporta;ion (509) 324-6000
August 17, 1998
Mr. John Pederson
Spokane County Planning
West 1026 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re:7E-5-98 (Divcon Rezone)
Dear NIr. Pederson:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has reviewed and concurs
with the vaffic mitigation outlined in the July 10, 1998 letter from Mr. Todd Whipple of
Inland . Pacific Engineering, for tbe above development. As a result, we ask that thc
following mitigating measures be applied to this development through Spol.ane County's
SEPA process and as conditions of approval on this rezone:
1. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to VVSDOT standards a left tum lane along
with all ather needed components (illumination, sidewalk replacement, etc.) on Pines
Road to serve Euclid Avenue both Westbound and Eastbound. This left turn lane shall
be constructed as part of the first phase of this development to allow safe and efficient
access to and from Euclid for this development. Prior to the release of building
pernuts for this development the applicant shall enter into a WSDOT developers
agreement for this improvement and prepare an intersection plan for WSDOT
approval. The applicant is also aware that the construction of this left turn lane
requires that he obta.in additional right of way which is controlled by others.
In order to adequately ac:commodate drainage as a result of the wideaing for the left
turn lane the applicant shall grant WSDOT a permanent drainage easement on this site.
This easement area shall be of sufficient size to treat the stormwater per Spokane
County standards and be accessibie by truck for maintenance. These drainage plans
will need to be reviewed and approved by WSDOT prior to construction of these
drainage facilities. '
3. The applicant shall design, fund, and install to WSDOT standards a traffic signal at the
Pines Road and Euclid Avenue intersection. This traffic signal shall be installed whcn
signal warrants are met and when traffic volumes necessitate its installation. Prior to
release of building pernlits for this development the applicant shall provide a surety
bond to WSDOT in an amount acceptable to WSDOT for the installation of this
signal.
In addition to the above, we a.sk chat the following conditions of approval be applied to
this development:
- - a
Mr. Pederson
August 17, 1998
Page 2
l. The applicant shall construct sidewalk along the property frontage adjacent to Pines
Road and re-construct the sidewalk were it is removed as a result of the left turn lane.
2. As a result of the left tum channelization, the one groposed direct access to Pines Raad
will be for right turns in and out oaly, no lefts will be allowed.
3. The proposed private access to Pines requires that the applicant obtain a WSDOT
Road Approach Pernut for the intended site use.
With the above mitigation and conditions of approval WSDOT has no objections to this
development moving forward.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me at 324-6199.
Sincerely,
0
Greg Figg
Transportation Planner
GF:
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
Cathy Ramm, Ramm and Associates
Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering
Chris Damitio, WSDOT
~ yVashington State
j BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD INTEROFFICE MAI
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Verril Sm , ngineer
I For Spokane County Engineerrii ivision
ublic orks Department
I 721 N. Jefferson St., Rm. 401
I Spokane, WA 99260-0040
~ (509) 456-4237 FAX (509) 456-3631
March 1, 1999
.'iCfviU f CJ: r;fi~CtEU C,OU(lly L
FROM: Sus,-1n M. lNinchell, Boundary Review Board Planner
RE: BR6 531-98: Irvin Water District No. 6 Final Resolution No. 99-1
I n accordance with the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 91-1458, I am
distributing a copy of the Final Resolution, map and legal description for Irvin Water
District No. 6's recent annexation. I have confirmed that the legal description included
in the Final Resolution is one and the same as the Washington State Boundary
Review Board for Spokane County approved in BRB 531-98: Proposed Annexation of
15 Acres to the Irvin Water District No. 6(Pinecroft Business Park). The effective date
for the annexation is February 9, 1999. The Boundary Review Board staff has updated
these boundaries on the County's Geographic Information System to include this
annexation. Please change your records accordingly.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 477-4237.
R~C'Ej VED
MqRn 1 1
9
SPpKAN` Cv:;"s ;r.}. EN J
GlNEER
E3OARI) 11T!%1RI:R~: Nt:irv Eicnh;►m I;{~E~c•rt f~ tic•hcroaIl 1~:ill% I: liuN,nclck f.:t«'rencc fi tiu1i1C' AflT1CRlaric- Wisrr-
,
t
AlAk +4 lr%ll1l W8ter Dl5t'1ct No. 6 `-j 7999
11907 E. TIent AVeIlile
r~.~pt]kanep WA 99206
(509)924'9320 F$x' (509)924-9084
RESOL.UTiC)N NO. 99-1
I~~~LUIiON ~F FINAL ORDER OF ANNEXAMN
- Page 1 of 2
A RESOLUTTON OF IRVIN WA'IER DISTRICT NO. 6, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHNGTON, To FuTi.LY ANI7 FINALLY ACCEPT T'BE ANNEXAITON OF 15
~CRE5 OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED BEi,OW.
BE IT RESDLVED BY THE BOARD OF ~OM~MIIS5~ONER5 OF THE IRVIN
WATF.R DISTRICT NO. G, of Spvkane County, Washington, as fvRows:
W&3EREASa thr, Boazd of Camtnissionen af hvin Water District No. 6accepted and
approved the anmexatinn nf 15 acres (Pitxecraft Business Parkl sub$ect tn Bou.ndary
Re-vrievu Board appioval; and
VLHEREAS, Boundary Revicw Board File 531-98 (Pinecroft Business Park) was approved
ott December 18, 1999, by the WashiVon State Boundary Review Board fox Spokaae
Cauut5r,
I~OW THEREFORF, BE IT RESOLVED, ffiat the Baazd of Cornnii.sgoners of IRVIN
WATER DISTRICT NO. 6 fuUy and finally amepts the annexatian of the Pinecroit
Businm Park decribed as foRows:
LEGAL DEISCRIPT'~ON. A pvrtion of the NW 114 af Section 10, Tawnsbip 25
North, Rattge 44 Emt W,M., Spvk,ane Caunl.y, Washington.
P~~ 2 °JZ
~resc~~°'~ }
fot
P, 1999.
°f -140• b
*as
-
~omn,;ss~°n~ F
``~♦~~tll~~l,~~~ -
♦ ~
~ ~
i~' ex
'•~nu7ussian
.
r - •
.
•
. •
.
: •
.
~ ' ♦ ~,~SS10~eT
~ • • . . . . `~1► ~p
ltittl~
. ,
S~retax~
~SEAL~
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESC:RIPTION
FOR
AREA TO BE ANNEXED INTO IRVIIN WATER DISTRICT
The North 53 1/3 rods of the IWV 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, T. 25 N., R 44 E.,
W.M. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington
EXCEPT the East 330.00 feet of said NW 1/4 of the NVV 1/4;
AND EXCEPT County Road right of way;
AND EXCEPT the South 26 2!3 rods of ihe West 30 rods of the North 53 1/3 rods of the
NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4.
TOGETHER with the North 300.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of the F.ast 330.00 feet of
the W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of said sectian.
WASHINGTON STATE BOUNC?ARY REV!EW BOARD
FOR SPOKANE COUNTY
CERTIFICATE OF EXPIRATION OF 45-DAY PERIOD
I hereby certify that more than 45 days have elapsed since the following described
Notice of Intention was filed with the Washington State Boundary Review Board for
Spokane County and that at no time during said period was a Request for Review filed
with the Board. The proposed action is hereby deemed approved as provided in RCW
36.93.100.
FILE NO.: BRB 531-98: Proposed Annexation of 15 Acres to the Irvin Water
District No. 6(Pinecroft Business Park)
INITIATOR(S): Irvin Water District No. 6
DATE FILED: November 3, 1998
45-DAY REVIEW
PERIOD ENDS: December 18, 1998
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The following described lands situated in Spokane County,
State of Washington, to wit:
The North 53 1/3 rods of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.,
W.M. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
EXCEPT the East 330.00 feet of said NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
AND EXCEPT County Road right of way;
AND EXCEPT the South 26 2/3 rods of the West 30 rods of the North 53 113 rods of
said NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4.
TOGETHER with the North 300.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet of the East 330.00 feet of
the W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of said section.
TIME LIMIT: The action proposed in this Notice of Intention must be officially consummated on or before December 18, 2001, or the approval, as defined in this
document shall be null and void. (Boundary Review Board Rules of Practice and
Procedure)
DATED at Spokane, Washington this eighte h da f D ember, 1 8.
WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW OR SP U
)-x Lawrence Stone, Chair V A ST:
Wa. inc ell, AICP
Boundary Review Board Planner
4
.
_
io _ 4
.
DDAc .
6~2• . .
$ .
,A
. ~
. ~
~
.
140
.
. w
cAL
~
. t,6 t ;,~o° ~a.
.
•
. ~
• .
.
tJCL ••.Al~~ • •
57 . ~
't'R G o'`.~
a►
'tR ~ g • 007 ,~ES A201
~
; ~►3 ~ ,7 ,~5~°~s-~
o ' sT ~
.
M • ~t~
.
`
CERTIF'ICATION
I, the undersigned Secretary of Irvin Water District No. 6 of Spokane County, Washington,
hereby cerbfy that the foregoing Resolution is a fu11, ttue, and correct copy of a resolution duty
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of C:ommissioners of Irvin Water District No. 6 duty on
Febivaty 9, 1999, of which meeting all members of said Board had due notice and at which a
majority thereof were present; and at that said meeting said resolution was adopted lry the
following vote:
Ayes, and In Favor Thereof Commissioners: ~
Nos, Commissioners: 0
Absent, Commissioners: 0
Abstain, Commissioners:
I further certify that I have carefulty compared the same with the original resolution on file
and of record in my office; that said Resolution is a full, true and cotrect copy of the origainal
Resolution adopted at said meeting; and that said Resolution has not been amended, modified, or
rescinded since the date of its adoption, and it is now in full force and effect
IN W[TNESS WBEREOF, I have set my hand and e off•icial seal of said District
on February 9, 1999.
W TER DIS NO. 6
1
,
%
Mti111wt11j/~ez Conunissioner ~
....,~'Azo 00~
~
:2: SPOK ME
:Q - = Commissioner
~t% ; CpUNV ; 04M
: - •
.
•~~s . ~
♦ O ••.•~P`~~
~~ij A~.
• Commissioner
Attest:
Secretary
(SEAL)
cert.wpd.2l9/99
r, JUN-26-1998 08:25 INLRND PACIFIC ENG P.01
INLAND PACIF C ENGINEERING
707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE ZOO
SPOKANE, wA 99204
TELEPHONE: (509) 458-6840 FAx: (509) 458-6844
FAX TRANSMI TTAL
DATE: June Zb, 1998 NO.OF PGS: 2iNCLUUING COVER SHEET
TO: ; Pat Harper FAX NO.: 324-7655
~
COMPANY: '.Spokane Co, Engineering PHONE NO.: 456-3600
FROM: ; Todd R. Whipple, P.E. JOB_NO.:, 98425
PROJECT: ; Divcon - Pines and Euclid Rezone - Traffic Scope - REVISIONS/CLARIFICATIONS
ORIGINAL IN MAIL: O YES NO
NOYES:
Pat:
Per our meeting on )une 8,1998 and prior to my leaving on vacat+on, we never fully finished our
discussion and resolution regarding scope and impact mitigation. As I understand it the
intersections scheduled for analysis and based upon Tirn Schwab's original distribution arc as
follows:
1. Pines and Mission
2. Pines and the E6 and W8 ramp terminals
3. Pines and Mansfreld
4. Pines and Euclid
S. Pines and Trent .
Additionally, at the scoping meeting that you had with Tim, his distribution indicated that traffic from
this development would use Mirabeau Point Drive to access the Evergreen interchange. Associated
with this distribution the following two additional intersections were scoped:
6. Mirabeau Point Drive and Indiana
7. Indiana and Evergreen
gased upon our 6/8/98 meeting, enclosed is a new distribution wherein no traffic is expected to use
Mirabeau Point Drive as a commuter route. "fhe justification for the revision is that on a time based
analysis, this route does not seem practicable or feasible unless the trips are mall bound. 1f they are
mall bound then they have already been analyzed as mall trips (pass by / diverted) and not Divcan
trips, ultimately these trips would represent a convoluted diverted trip of some kind, resulting in a
compounding vf impacts. It is much more defensibie to have commuter traffic use Trent as the
primary access due to time constraints. Therefore, as we discussed we are omitting these lndiana
intersections from the scoping so as to not compound the areas developmental impacts. Pfease
recogn;ze that this is based upon the forgone concfusion that a signal is required and wifl be
constructed at Pines and Euclid.
JUN-26-1998 08:25 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02
.
~ Spokane County
Page 2
At that meeting we also discussed the general concept of mitigation for this project along Pines
Road. You indicated that you were working toward the concept of a benefit area much like what
was established out at Liberty Lake. Based upon the concept of a benefii area, as well as the
unknowns surrounding the actual shift in traffic from I-90 when Evergreen is opencd plus other
projects mitigating measures, there is the likelihood that Pines wif) function very we11 urtder all
remaining development conditions. 6ased on this we would like to have the scope of the project
reduced to one of two following proposals.
A. limit the sCOpe to only the Pincs and Euclid and Pines and Trent intersections. The primary
justification for this is the extent of the analyses done to dzte for the Mirabeau Point FZezone,
the Lawson Gunning project as well as the Valley Mall (plus numerous others in this
corridor). The gist of the rnatter is that with many of the varying proposals at ali of ihe
intersections, the ra{culated LOS varies from l.OS B to F. Because of this, a lot of
recommendations arelor could be moot depending upon individual project development and
timing and the opening of the Evergrecn interchange. Additionally, if the other mitigations
occur, I feel fairly confident that all intersections will operate in the lOS C!O range even after
this development. The exceptions being Pines and Mission, where the intersection is now
fully ROW constrained lirniting any options to a very few timing scenarios and the Pines and
Trent intersection, where it is becoming more apparent that future mitigation is required.
The analysis at Pines and Euclid, will serve to re-analy2e the direct affect of this project
-accessing Pines at this point with additional impacts at Pines and Trent. Yhe affect is that the
mitigation for this project will be in the realm of reality, whic.h ! feel ranges between $1,000
and $1,250 per PM Peak hour trip.
B. The second option for consideration is to not da a full traffic study, just a threshold study and
accept a mitigation construction value of $1,000 to $1,250 per PM Peak Hour trip, this
project is expected to generate 185 PM Peak trips, this wQUld equate to $185,000 to
$231,250. 7his could be canditi4ned to the future signal at Pines and Euclid as well as the
widening or part of this amount could be directed toward minor existing inadequacies
identified in other studies at Pines and Trent.
I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible on one of these options.
Cafl with any questions. Sincerely,
Inla Pacifi gineering, Inc.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
President
cc: file TOTAL P.02
JUL-06-1998 11:16 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
Jlily 6, 1998 Post-it' Fax Note 7671 Joaw-1• # ► 2. 1
W.O. No. 98425 To Rom
CaJDW co ~
SPokane CountY Public Works pr,o~ t Phom
• ~
~
W. 1026 Broadway Fax ,r "
MM-7ur Fax r
~
Spokane, WA 99260 '
Attn: Steve Stairs / Pat Harper
Re: Divcon, Pines and Euclid - Traffic Distribution
Dear Steve:
I am in receipt of your memorandum dated .lune 30, 1998 and understand your question
regarding the access to Mirabeau Point Ihive and the difference between the number of
distributed trips between our two submittals. While, I believe that there will be trips _
from this site using Mirabeau Point Drive for access to and from this facility, Y do not
believe that when using a time based system there will be a significant advantage to using
Mirabeau Point Drive to access either Evergreen Road or Sullivan Road when traveling ~
- southbound from the proposed project. To the contrary, I believe that Pines Road will
provide a far superior and shorter (time and distance) trip than anything that Mirabeau
Point will have to offer the commuting public. This is especially true and apparent when
dcaling with the "Nvork to home based" type of trip. Based on this I can state that I
strongly believe, that if the commuters are intent on going strictly from work to home and
their destination is either I-90 or those residential areas south of I-90 they in fact will use
Pines, especially if there is a signal present ai Pines and Euclid. .
I believe that if you review all of the traffic information gathered in the area, you wi11
find that at full build-out of this area, we are projecting that Pines, with some revisions,
will have nearly the same LOS as those intersections laying along Evergreen Road.
Therefore, based on time, the Mirabeau point Drive to Indiana Avenue to Evergreen
Road route will not only be longer than the Pines Road route, it will also have more
signalized intersections to pass through and more iurning movements than the direct
route using Pines Road.
Now as I stated earlier, while I do believe that trips from this site will use Mirabeau Point
Drive as an access route, I do not believe that these will be "work to home-based" type
trips, instead they will be "work to other (retail)" type trips with Lhe finalleg of the trip
being an "other (retail) to home-base" type trip. Therefore, I will stand by the revised
distribution away from Mirabeau Point Drive to Pines Road, unless, the iraffc study
707 WPCt 7th • SwtP 200 IILA i ak.-wccxi Dnve • Suitp 205
Spokanr, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alerte, ID 83814
509458-6840 • FAX. 509-458-6844 208-765•7784 0 fAX: 208-769-7277
JUL-06-1998 11:17 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02
Spokane County
July 6, 1998
Page 2
criteria is intended to deal with brips other than "work to home-base". Additionally, I
assume that any trips using Mirabeau Point Drive from this site that are in the "work to
other" trip type category, should already be included in other area project traffic studies
as either new trips, which technically they are from this description, or diverted, but I
will object to them being classified as pass-by as that would infer a trip with this as it's
primary route.
Per your request, I believe that our revised trip distribution of 6/26/98 should be used as
the trip disfiribution of choice for the "~vork to home-based" type trips and have provided
my seal below to validate this letter as my professional opinion and to justify it's use in
the Divcon, Inc. trafnc study..
Should you have any questions or conunents please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely, ~
Inl Pacific 'neering Co. ~ WAS lA,~
A°x
' - d
Todd R WhiPPle, P.E. ~
~
President '
~ox~►i.
TRW/tw EXRIRES 9/24/ ~
cc: John Miller, Divcon, Inc.
file
TOTAL P.02
/
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 30, 1998
IN
TO: Pat Harper
CC: Tim Schwab, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. I 1
Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. '
Gregg Figg, Washington State Department of Transportation John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
~
FROM: Steve Stairs (S7 SPINNE COUIyTY
SUBJECT: Revised Divcon Project Distribution
I have reviewed the revised distribution for the Divcon project at Euclid Ave. & SR27. In looking
at the new information provided, I have made the following conclusions:
• The size and proposed uses of the project have been refined to include 60ksf general office
building and 108.4ksf of business park as compared to the original proposal for 138ksf of
business park submitted at the original scoping meeting. This results in approximately 20
additional pm peak hour trips.
• The original trip generation was based entirely on general office building land use. If this
land use was used for the entirety of the current proposal, the 168.4ksf would generate 251
pm peak hour trips or approximately 45 additional trips.
• The trip distribution now shows all traffic to/from the project using SR27 and no traffic
traveling east on Euclid toward Mirabeau Point Dr. or the Evergreen Interchange.
The revised distribution, as submitted, cannot stand on its own The reason for the various
changes to the distribution and land uses should be provided. To address these issues, I ask
for the following from the project's traffic engineer:
1. A letter describing the methodology used to develop the distribution submitted 6/26/98 and
why it is changed from the distribution submitted 6/1 /98.
2. A site plan showing the location of proposed uses and building areas for the site.
The additional material requested above should contain the seal of the engineer responsible for
the work. This would signify that in their professional judgment the information provided is
reasonable and within accepted practice standards. Upon receipt and review of the requested
information, I suggest a meeting with the sponsor, consultant and reviewing agencies to discuss
the scope of the traffic study.
If you have any questions concerning the review of this distribution, please feel free to bring
them to my attention.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 30, 1998
ta
TO: Pat Harper
CC: Tim Schwab, Iniand Pacific Engineering, Inc. I~I
Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. "
Gregg Figg, Washington State Department of Transportation
John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
FROM: Steve Stairs SDS SPOI(4COWT'1' .
SUBJECT: Revised Divcon Project Distribution
I have reviewed the revised distribution for the Divcon project at Euclid Ave. & SR27. In looking
at the new information provided, I have made the following conclusions:
• The size and proposed uses of the project have been refined to include 60ksf general office
building and 108 4ksf of business park as compared to the original proposal for 138ksf of
business park submitted at the original scoping meeting. This results in approximately 20
additional pm peak hour trips.
• The original trip generation was based entirely on general office building land use. If this
land use was used for the entirety of the current proposal, the 168.4ksf would generate 251
pm peak hour trips or approximately 45 additional trips.
• The trip distribution now shows all traffic to/from the project using SR27 and no traffic
traveling east on Euclid toward Mirabeau Point Dr. or the Evergreen Interchange.
The revised distribution, as submitted, cannot stand on its own. The reason for the various
changes to the distribution and land uses should be provided. To address these issues, I ask
for the following from the project's traffic engineer:
1. A letter describing the methodology used to develop the distribution submitted 6/26/98 and
why it is changed from the distribution submitted 6/1/98.
2 A site plan showing the location of proposed uses and building areas for the site.
The additional material requested above should contain the seal of the engineer responsible for
the work. This would signify that in their professional judgment the information provided is
reasonable and within accepted practice standards Upon receipt and review of the requested
information, I suggest a meeting with the sponsor, consultant and reviewing agencies to discuss
the scope of the traffic study.
If you have any questions concerning the review of this distribution, please feel free to bring
them to my attention.
Post-it~ Fax Note 7671 Date pa9es► 1 Post-it~ Fax Note 7671 Date ~9gs► ,
(
To o dU W 141pP/e I From ~e S" f.G,.~ rS To -rl m sC.44tJ/kPj From -!~s42cf e~~l t`
Co./Dept.~~ ICo 500C- rr✓~~ Cf/t.`Yt~ CoJDept. Co SPdk=G'''~ l-V'^n4L
Phone # Phone # V Phone # Phone #
AS ds- -3
~ ~0 0'0
Fax # ~,S ~ ~ I Fax # ~jZ4 r -4.~ g Fau # S 4-1 iFax # 2 ~ _ S ,
J
~
JUN-26-1998 09=31 iNLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01
,
r
INLAi,ND PACIFYC ENGINEERING
707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Telephone: (509) 458-6840 FAX: (509) 458-6844
FA X TRANSMITTAL
DATE: NO.OF PAGES: 4' (inc[uding cover page)
To: PA-r Fax _ 32 f - 74 97s
COMPANY: SPoKAW, Cov,✓-r r PHONE
FYtOM: 'ToDp VJ,4!,.
0_ J-51*4 $r.AWAS JOB
PRo,rECT NAMEE: b~ ~&'V pgo,wr
ORIGiNAL IN MAZL; Q YES 01 lY0
NoxEs:
f~rs~~8v~o
~-r - AAMst> 4,p- 7Nr, -rg,r-
~
.
~rz `~i~ g~w ~p&rr AT f~was r fi-vu lv i r 7vim
44p E .OP-A 44"-
I-F )6v Aor.. J40Y 4VP"r,VJ-S.
REV 5/97 0.tF0~RMSXhAXS1TEET WPD
. ~
~
`t I
~
~
IXX
EUCEJC AVENEIE ~~T to se" r~ ~i
a ~
~
9 ~
ljjll~
~~'~uE a I~uDlAr~~ AwENUE .10 ~ ~~~NO"
a
~ A A'E14U
%o.
,
~ R
~RAMP 90
~
~
AVENuE .
~
~i z~ 4
ul
~
C.
i ~ 1
~
y
m
...i
0 `A
~ W
/001~ 3
Z
tpt TO sc"
N~E
AvE,.
~ ~~b1 ph~'r n
M W m
W o
y INDlANq AVENtlE
AA"uE 10 '
~
~ MANi
5NANNON
.
IN0IANA u 1
4-• ~ We,
1 ~ . RAMP 90
t r• ~
~
1 N \ ~ Q
. ~
N' ikP"" ~
r
~
04 A,E~vE
wS51N o
a.
. , , ~
JUN-26-1998 09:32 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.04
~ P. .
' ~r~l ► ~ ~ ~ cl i 41
DIVCON PROJECT 26-Jun-1998
PROJECT # 98425
GENERAL QFFICE BUILDING (710)
# K.S.F. AM Rate % in % out PM Rate % in % out
1.56 88°!0 12% 1.49 17% 83%
60 94 82 11 89 15 74
ADT = 11.01 661
BUSINESS PARK (770) 20-30% OFFICE, 70-80% WAREHOU$E
# K.S.F. AM Rate % in % out PM Rate % in % out
1.43 88% 12% 1.29 17% 83%
108.4 155 136 19 140 24 116
AD7 ~ 11.01 1193
AM Rate % in % out PM Rate % in % out
TOTALS 249 219 30 229 39 190
TOTAL P.04
i3U ~u-;~hesSI ~A~~ ,
s-
~ p,~ENUE S~? . # ,
N~ Post-it~ Fax~Note ~ 7671 Date ~ o pages~
~RE 7 ~
I 11 I 2
To (__I01/(- tCk IFrom
~ Co.lDept Co
Phone # I Phone H~5.~
cA:'
s ( _ Fax # Fax N
• ~ fs~!• ~ ~
y EUCLID AVENUE = 2s ;
D<,r~AC- D(S-M 9 LA:riaPJ 0F (,or1119
QO
.
W NOT TO SCALE
LLJ
y MANSFIELD AVENUE
. o
T6ot _
s5~'
r. SHANNON AVENUE
[o ~
INDIANA AVENU INp~A
r-zs°( 25~ ~j NA
~ 56S94 z5°~ AVENUE
~ 30t f'
Q-.
RAMp t •
1 t1 ~ w e.~ ~s
~b 50(0 ~ ~y5~
20 Mp
+ 201,5~ 207. id1. 90
~ol.~ ~ E.g, RAM
Z T
20'1•
ui •p ~
Z~I0 ~ Q Q
Q: MISSION AVENUE ~ o ~
w a-. i
~ N T,o
b Z Zo
a ,
vCo,,,i
~
Zo4
~
~ ~
~ pVENUE io scA
EuCUO s► ~
~
~9A
~ ~ ~ ~ QPG
21 W ~ ~1~
W
~
~
Ln
14 A~NUE Y ~NDl,qNq
AVENUE _
~ t NNON AVENUE
Z~ SNA
14 or a pyENU
y 1N01ANA
4 1~ ~ jy6!
p ~ 51
RAMP ~
g
~ .
-
► ~
~ MP W ~ *p
8. RP oC Q ~
T
LAJ~ .
4 AVENUE
~ y C) MISS►~N
~
w
~ z ~ ~~►~~~k~~~
~
, 1 ~ i
Divcon Traffic Study
Date: Monday, June 1, 1998
Attended By: Tim Schwab, Inland Pacific Engineering
Greg Figg, WSDOT
Pat Harper, Spokane County
Steve Stairs, Spokane County
Update existing traffic numbers?
• eliminate some of the background project list from Mirabeau
• uses current information - Mirabeau numbers are 2 and 3 years old
• may show mirabeau study is significantly different or in error
• may validate mirabeau study
• WSDOT doing construction on Pines corridor which would alter normal counts and
may not be complete for several weeks
Contribution to Evergreen I/C.
• 60 pm peak hour trips
What if Mirabeau Point Dr. terminates with a cul-de-sac?
• Interim phasing of project could help this
• all project traffic goes to Pines & Euclid intersection
Planning's concern about cut through traffic on Mirabeau Point Dr?
• 60 pm peak hour trips in addition to Mirabeau Point's 74 for phase I
Lots of problem intersections (traffic/air quality) increase study costs.
• Indiana & Evergreen • Pines & Indiana
• Indiana & Mirabeau Point Dr • Pines & WB ramps
• Pines & Trent • Pines & EB ramps
• Pines & Euclid • Pines & Mission
Is Euclid Ave sufficient to handle 30% of project traffic?
• Mirabeau Point 38 trips WB & 36 trips EB for phase I
• Mirabeau Point 90 trips WB & 62 trips EB for phase II
Is the 30% distributed to Mirabeau Point Dr. realistic?
Pines & Euclid intersection will need signalization to accommodate WBL traffic.
State may look to ask for funding of signal at Pines & Euclid rather than incremental
contributions to other mitigation.
Divcon Traffic Study
Date: Monday, June 1, 1998
Attended By: Tim Schwab, Inland Pacific Engineering
Greg Figg, WSDOT
Pat Harper, Spokane County
Steve Stairs, Spokane County
Update existing traffic numbers?
• eliminate some of the background project list from Mirabeau
• uses current information - Mirabeau numbers are 2 and 3 years old
• may show mirabeau study is significantly different or in error
• may validate mirabeau study
• WSDOT doing construction on Pines corridor which would alter normal counts and
may not be complete for several weeks
Contribution to Evergreen I/C.
• 60 pm peak hour trips
What if Mirabeau Point Dr. terminates with a cul-de-sac? -
• Interim phasing of project could help this
• all project traffic goes to Pines & Euclid intersection
Planning's concern about cut through traffic on Mirabeau Point Dr?
• 60 pm peak hour trips in addition to Mirabeau Point's 74 for phase I
Lots of problem intersections (traffic/air quality) increase study costs.
• Indiana & Evergreen • Pines & Indiana
• Indiana & Mirabeau Point Dr. • Pines & WB ramps
• Pines & Trent • Pines & EB ramps
• Pines & Euclid • Pines & Mission
Is Euclid Ave. sufficient to handle 30% of project traffic?
• Mirabeau Point 38 trips WB & 36 trips EB for phase I
• Mirabeau Point 90 trips WB & 62 trips EB for phase II
Is the 30% distributed to Mirabeau Point Dr. realistic?
Pines & Euclid intersection will need signalization to accommodate WBL traffic.
State may look to ask for funding of signal at Pines & Euclid rather than incremental
contributions to other mitigation.
i
. •
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
September 24, 1998
W.O. No. 98425
Spokane County Public Works R
W. 1026 Broadway ~p 2 519sa
S okane, WA 99260 S
p E COUN~ EcIGNE01
SPO~'N
Attn: Pat Harper
Re: Divcon - Pines and Euclid
Comments from WSDOT
Dear Pat:
Enclosed is an internal e-mail to me from Tim Schwab of IPE, in this e-mail he notes that the
WSDOT may be requiring us to provide a left turn on Pines Road for the school. It is my
understanding from the MDNS document that the WSDOT waived that right as we do not
control that ROW. In the event that the WSDOT wishes to provide a left turn to the elementary
school, they are most welcome to start condemnation proceedings on the Fritz Wolff property
and pay for the betterment to their system.
Please assist us on this issue as we are conditioned to have the intersection done prior to
receiving our occupancy pernuts. With the late date, this is becomi.ng an even more crucial
issues due to the remaining number of paving days. As of today, we have submitted the Pines
Road and Euclid intersection/widening plails to the WSDOT for review and approval so that
construction can begin in earnest.
Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Inland acific gineering Co.
.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
President
TRW/tw
cc: John Miller, Divcon, Inc.
file
707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Unve • Swte -105
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83614
309-438-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 9 FAX: 208-769-7277
►
- Toaa whippie
From: Tim Schwab
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 1998 9:03 AM
To: Todd Whipple
Subject: Divcon Project
Todd - Greg Figg called this moming and said the meetmg at WSDOT on the Divcon Project has
been called off today and he is going to try to reschedule it for next week.
Greg said that Ted Trepanier looked at the Intersection plan for approval for the widening and said
that we need to provide a left tum lane into the school driveway. I thought that this had all been
worked out. Maybe you should call Ted since it sounds like he is the one to ok the intersection
and see what we have to do or convince him otherwise. Ted's phone number is 324-6550. Also
Mike Whitaker is involved in review of the plan. His number is 324-6553.
Tim
p
<
SEP-24-1998 10:37 IPLAND PACIFIC EtJG P.01
. ~
,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
Stptcmber 24, 1998
W.O. No. 98425
Spokanc Couaty Public Works
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokanc, WA 99260
Atm: Pat Harpar
Re: Divcon - Pinea And Euclid
Commcnts from WSDOT
Dcar Pat:
Enclosed is ann intcrnal c-mail to mc from Tim Schwab of IPE, in this e-mail he notes that the
WSDOT may be requiring us to provide a left tirn on Pines Road for the school. It is my
understaoding from thc NIDNS documtnt that thc WSDOT waived that right as we do not
control that ROW. Ln the event that the WSTJOT wishcs to providc a left tum to the elementary
school, they are most welcome to start condemn,ation proceedings on the Fritz Wolff propcrty
and pay for thc bettcrment to thcir system.
Plcasc assist us on this issuc as wc arc conditioncd to havc thc intcrscction donc prior to I
receiving our occupancy permits. With the late date, this is becoming an even more crucial
issues due to the remaining number of paving days. As of today, we have subinitted thc Pincs
Road and Euclid intcrscction/widcning plaas to thc WSDOT for rcvicw and approval so that
Gvnstruction can begin in earnesG
Should you have aay questions or commeIIts pleast do not hesitatre to call.
Sincerety,
z Inlaa acific ' eering Co.
.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
Presidcnt
TRW/tw
cc: John Miller. Divcon, lnc.
file
707 w" 7t, • suire zoo 2020 La►ewooa o~ive •Suiee 205
Spokane. W/199X14 Coeur d'Altne, iD 83811
509-456-6840 9 FAX: 509-458-6844 20&765-7784 • FAX~ 208-769-7277
l
SEF-24-1998, "10 :38 1 NLAND PRC I F I C ENG P. 02
.
~ ~u• _ y±" , - l .e1 + - ~ ~ tR W, `I
`C
~iOS11: Ttm ~11Nab
~ett: ThurSday, Se~~ember a4, 1998 9:03 AAII
Yo: Todd Whipple
; Subject: Divcon Prooct
Todd - Greg Flgg catied this moming end said the meefing at WSDOT on the Divcon Rroject has
been called off today and ht is going to try to reschedufe it for next weetc.
Greg said that Ted Trepanier looked at the Intemwtion ptan for approval for the widenin8 and said
that wre need to provide a left tum lane into the school driveway. I tlhought that 4his had all been
worksd out. Maybe you shoutd call Ted since it sounds like he is the one to o0c the intersection
and see what we have to do ar convinoe him othenNise. Ted's phone number is 3246550. Also
Mihe Whitaker is invoived in neview of the plan. His number is 324--6553.
Tim
0
TOTAL P.02
OCT-15=1998 10:27 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01
~
~
~
INLAND PACMC EN'GINEERING
- - 707 West ?th Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
7Celephonea (509) 458-6840 FAXe (509) 458-68"
FA4C TRANSMIT'TAL
bATE: /0 iv0. OF PAGFS: Z (inetading cover puge)
TO: TL-r 0&ItPE RL FEiX
coMPANY: rHoxE
FRoM: -ort wA 6:,#9915 JOa
PROJEcT NAMIE: OJ t piv&L4 Qp Paso- Ar -Ew*m,
OJrcINAa, rx NAM: (3 xEs C) rto
NoTEs:
aT
AC Evacv, Pi-sim 4P... ae Akx Wrm ?'wa Cow-r,ff,
-fl VA
REV. 5/97 0:1FORMSIl~'AXSHEET.WD
QCT-15-1998 10:28 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P'02
7- rNLAND F.ACgFIC ENGINEER1ING
. • ~ 707 West ?th Avenue, Suite 200
.
, Spo~ane4 WA mm
$'eIlePhOme: (509) ~~~~O IFAX: (509) 458-6844
_ I
~ . .
~'.~X TRANSMITTAL
iDA'II'E: NO.OF lAGES: ~ (fatcdudft cover pqge)
TO: We s. Q- FAx U:
coMeANY: PHoNE#: -
FlkOft- 6.ww,, _ JoB a:
„ s -
PatODECTATAM: P
4RIGQNAL IN-MAIL: Cl yES N0
NOTES:
.!r#ow1w6 A:r.~ - ~~o PIA
. Ar T~ Lt~s~ s~~r, i9lqjy,,d rA w.
Go405f $A,rS Yov A9Ar
~AA4V-4 .
, •
R.EV: Sf97 4~~ORMS1FAXSlM.WPD
OCT7-15-1998 10:28 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.03
INLAND ~~~~~~RING
707 West ?th Aveaaue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Telephonee (509) 458-6840 FAX: (509) 45",~
FAX TRANSM17TAL
DaTE: No. oF pmGEs:
TO: FAx a: 7 - 95'O0
coMPMnr:-&gr VAu.W !riWoo` Digr PHoxE#:
FROM: --risn SGflwAs JOB '~~•~~S
PROJEC? NAAM:
OIUG1NAL aAT MAHL: ❑ YES 10 NO
N0TES:
,5i&-w1A4 j6m.4wA►orr L",Egs
4,o&VA IS~ <G hlOdL- 1-m Ar 7«/At- AT Et, isvGd i m
~''s C4,a- ~ EA?A 6WA44eg Yo~ MAT
0?~Aeo- tyw f r `m ttPV. SJ97 O.VFORMSWAXStEET.WPD
OCT-15=1998 10 :28 I NLFND PAC I F 1 C ENG P.04
x
J' •
. A.
~
~
~ . ~
i i
~ ~ -
.
a°~~ a14
. ~
: fa
,
.
5ie_-now AT S'~~ ~
/oo' ~ RI►tirvs 'N~ ~ Cv~v~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
;
r„ow 4~f_
c
s
W~sT S~. '~x+I11
r,,.~,t+ea.o sA r c
K4o~+,b~rrs ~e P Gso~~ ly~,~ •
• • I
' , ~r ~
ama~~~
~
~
~
• • . ~ `
it 10
i ~
~ i • ~ ~ ~ I
.
_ . _ I (
" ~ i I
. ~ 1 I ~
TOTAL P.04
aCT-07-i998 17=30 INLAND PACIFIC ENG ~ P.01
I ' ~~~~~~RING
` 707 West 7th Avenue, Sugte 200
Spokane, WA M04
Tiplephoneo (509) 458-6840 FAXo (s~)
FAX TRANsMrrTAL
DA1'E: ri10. OF PAGES: ~ (tnclQrd&vg com,►poge)
To: Ir ARPOP.- . FAx ~2~ -76 s5
coWArrY: .5~W:~Wf' Co. F..~ F, PHoNE
FRoM:
JOB
. ^ . .
PROJEC'I' NAME: wilc>gwlA)4 pl/ ?>,fiS-s
oxaG94AL IN MAIL: O YES ~ No
rtoTEs:
PAT ` ~~si> 41;,p- tvwo- ~ivFO 7aA Pm*✓ ~eAwi Io w #7
_ S A6cs-4os ~ vwp ~ ~i~~~Gt/T~'Y> l4-r ~ t
C~kp Tc- rv Awt, Aw dw~-rs .
REV, 5/97 O:tFORMSIFAXSHEEI.WPO
OCT-07-1998 17=30 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02
~
b► ~ ~ I _
. ' ~ ~ j ' . _
i ~
,
6 - " - - - -
_
conup .o~~Q
a=ar.4woa~o.
0t
~
- - _ .
~
. ~
ia- - - - - - - - - - -
on= ~NLLS0~3 ~ ' ,
I !
( I I~~ c )~s o~s+c~ vis
~
i'
. ~
> •
~ X
I
. _ . . . ' ' .
•
• - ~
*1 ^o , - _
l
~r.
w
t
R
ia
L ~ .~r~q tra~14!
N,
.
w
- . •
TOTAL P.02
.aH
+ ~ ~i: . - • - f:.~: ; • o ~ . , ~9
' • ~ ~
, ~ . • , , - } . ~ ' • ' .
~ _ v : . • . • i • J ~ ~ ' ' • ~
w 4 ~ • , - ~ ~ ~ , ~
: •
, ~ • ' ~ ' ~ • i
~r ~ ~ . s . 1 : ~ . I . 4
~;.ti..~.:~,' ♦ . s;. ~ ~ ` ' ' ~
•t .
. ' • • f , ~ .o• d • • , ~ • ~ :i _ ~ ~ . • ,
~ r ~ I • • ,t . _
• • • . ~ • t~~r ~ t \ ~ • , • ~ • .
.~L ~ • ~ • • ~ ~ ~ , I ~ • /
p • ~ • i i 4~ j. S j . i~~ • . . ~ ' . ~ • ~j
. ^ ~ ~ •1r+~~ I.• ~ f~ ~ , ~ I ,
~ ~ . . ~ • ~ - f•;, -f - . . , .
. ~ , ~ .
, • ~ a ~ . . . .
9 - s ~ .
. • v~ . ~ i
~ v • ~ . f - l i q .
• • {i
~ ~ ~ ~ r-~w • ~ t .
~ . . • ~
. . . ~ .
~ - ~ . ~ . ~
• ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ' ~ • ~ a 4. ~
~ . ,
. . b ~ , . • . . - ~ ; .000,,
. .o^'
• ~ , t e~o ~ ~
• . ~ ~ ' • • . .o ~ ~
.
. ~ ~ •~do... - ~ -
• ~ • , ' , • . • ' _ ` ~
. e-~-
somosinow
dp
~iS • • . • :
lo: ~ • ~ •~F
. . ~ e ~
•s~ ~ ~ At
~ • t . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
e ~ ~
• , , ~ . . ~
. . • ~ ~ ; ~ d
/ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ , ' ' . • ~ ~ r , ~
~ ~ . ' ' , . I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'y • .
~4t. ' : . . , , •
~ ' ~ ~ . , . . ,
• A . • ~ , • ~ 9 • ~ ~ ~ , • • . . ~ , : a,'I~
~ a~ ~ . • ~ • ' ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . - . ' • .
' 3 I~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ • • '~~t , •
~Z ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ :f • . . . .4d~,' . ~
, ► ~ ' r4 • ~ , ( ~ : . r `
; o ~ ~ ~ `~~4 • .
~
~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~
%A ~ ~ ~ o • ~ ~ , '
~ .000, ~ ~ ~
~ o°e~~ ~ ~ ~ • L~ ~~M~ ~ • -
T8 3Jdd
ASW~D S34 00 Z6L9-9Z6 6E:Et 866t/L0/8I
QCT-20-1998 89:46 INi.AND PACIFIC ENG P•01
.
INLAND PACIFIC'ENGINEERING
7071I1/EST 7TH AvENUE, SUtTE 200
SPOKaNE, WA 99204
TELEPHONE: (509) 458-6840 FAx: (509) 458-6844
FAX TRANSM/lTAl
y ' " . . .
1
DATE: 3 Oceober 20, 1998 PageS: INCLUDING COVER SHEET
w~1w ~~.~~w~~.~~.~ .T . _ ~ ww • • .~n~_ . ~ » ~ ~ • • • • . . • C.r . ~w~r.• w.~~.~rw..rr .~.~r~www~r~.~~
~ i
TQ: ~ Fritz H. FAX: 927•1151
. •0 •~.~.y.~ . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ,~.~...~..~n' . ~ . .
COMPAiVY: ~ Alvin J. wolff ;PHONE: . 922-2984, ext. 224
. . .......__---__W... . . . .
FRONI: f Todd R. Whipple, P.E. , JO6: ~ 98425
___..__..r._._ . . ..._._.__.__s.~---- _
.
PROjECT: t pines. Road - Development at Pines and Eucl FF1,
RIGINAL IN MAIL: O YES NO .
O
G
.
~OTES: ~ P
~
FI'ItZ,
Per our phone conversation yesterday, please find enclased two copies of the plans for the
intersec#ion improvementx-at Pines and Eudid which are currendy being proposed. As I stated, the
plan now being presented was not what we were conditioned for but the WSDOT has insisted that we
provide a small left turn fane into the school on the wes# side of Pines. This addition has extended the
taper starting point back approximately 100+/• . This will result in thc back of the sidewalk
encroaching upon your adjacent' property a maximurn of 3.64 feet and tapering to 0 feet within
approximateiy 105.74 feeL The taper and encroachment all occur within the existing 40-foot utility
easement The area to be covered by the sidewaik easement amounts t,o 192.45 square feet t/-.
6ased upon the nature of the undertying utility easements, this sidewalk easement and encroachment
will have no detrimental affect to the future development of the subject property. ThErefore, at this
point I woutd simpty ask that you reviedv and approve this easement request The easement although
being required by the WSDOT is not being funded by the WSDOT and I would ask tfiat.you allow che
relocation of the sidePwalk at no cost xo the developers of the adjacent property, who will incur all costs
of construc~iomand property restoration of said sidewalk.
Please review and call with any questions.
Sincerely,
Inl d Pacif n1'neenng, Inc.
.
Todd R. Whipple, P.E:
President
°
cr, fee , M4 ' S, . L4o • ~ ~D 1k% L104 ~4oe r)4%u v
. ~
1
t
t ~
(ID
a
~.00(
' ~ ~ • n
, ' 3 ~ ~ ~ ~
G ' ~ ~ ~ ~ QF►~
o q. 33 W
/ ~
2-61. ' •
_ 05474
,
~
~ "
' ,r, • / ' ~ ~~"{MQ .
.~y
• ~ ~ ~ . ~ _ ~ ~
r / •
N~ ~ .
~ r~ .
,
1
ER
a ~
.
42(f rAPER uoNeIH (35: 1) J00' S1qRAGS, Lp - i
1~~ , ♦ ,
130►
441
a ~
~ 41V
___-..-r~
~Y
aQ~m~~@dcL7C Fp~#: 4M3►ao` 40144ao SR 27 on" 4817F00 ` g ga ,o
- I . • ~ ~ a~~
r
tae ~ -OMM •
rrsr~~.....~.~r~~~ ~r~w ~~04~~ ~~~~~3~r~~~~~e I
• • ~
• 11~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 r ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~;~~~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~
r ~ r ~ ~ . ~ r • ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ r ~
EXtSTM tMT-. t
~ r OF WAY PROOSW ~ EI~"~' . 6U?~A, Qt K
1 (
u 5I
LL . . ~
~
~ ~ .
~ , .
DESIGN DATA ~ r or ~ ~ ~
oESM SR 27 ~r o - 2o ° . 4-1
~ aa~c~M
oa~aNw~ aoc~ss - ' '
m ~ ~ •
~ ~ nAT ' a~i
~ i a~ o ~Y iR~c r~o 4,~o ~ ~RilptS OM ~01
~ - F(EI~4 ~ SLO WOT , .
~ ~ ~
) STEEPER ~
~
~P~ARON ~ Pl~!l1~W PANIED
~ ~ g. 0:1 ~
OIRCOMAL O jg
~ ; S- 20 J~ 1
OiREC110NAL O~~I~Y YOUtI~ 1~
~1 ' ov~ zo
, ,
q1 . ~
~
,
I~
.
~ ,
TOTFL Q.03
REGEIVtD
~ Washington State Eastern Reg[o Jn A N G
De partment of Tran s p ortat_ ~on 2714 N Mayfair StreEt 1 1 19,,.
Sld Morrison Spo kane, W A 99207-
-:rr~t~r; c~r T- -,^r,~~~r WKANE COU(VTY ENG;'i:LL;
Januan- 7,1998
N1r. Tom Crouch
Director, Business Services
East Valley School nistrict No. ;6 1
12325 East Grace
Spokane, WA 99216
Re: Pines Road and Euclid Ave.
Widening
Dear Mr. Crouch
As you discussed yesterday in a phone conversation with Greg Figg of my otlice ~
regarding the above intersection widening project, I am attaching a current sketch of what
the Trent Elementary's south driveway to Pines Ave. would look like plus additional
details of the project.
The widening of Pines Road directly adjacent to the East Trent Elementary School for the ~
installation of a center left tum lane is being performed by Divcon Inc., the developer of
the property in the south east corner of Pines Road and Euclid Ave.. This widening was
required through the County's approval of their development to mitigate the traffic
impacts to Pines Road. This widening is taking place all to the east side of Pines Road
and as a result the existing sidewalk and sveet trees immediately in front of the school will
be unaffected by this project. Additionally, the two northerly access points to the school
will also be unaffected by this project. We anticipate that this project will be constructed ~
this coming spring by a contractor hired by Diveon Ine. and will be built according to road
plans which will have been approved by the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT). WSDOT will also inspect the work performed by the
contractor to ensure it meets the specifications called for in the plans.
Divcon Ine. will also be responsible for installing a traffic signal at this intersection in the
near future which necessitates alignment of the east and west approaches. As a result ot'
this requirement Inland Pacific Engineering, Divcon's engineer, has prepared a detail (see
attached) of the needed reconfiguration of the school's south approach to Pines Road to
allow correct alignment with Euclid Ave. Divcon will be responsible for the construction
of this appraach to the back of the radius on the school's property. If additional work is
needed beyond this point it would be the school's responsibility to perform. At this time
an arrangement with the property immediately south of the school has not come to fruition
but the eurrent design of the access to the school would not preclude this as a fiiture option
wltll OI1Iv R11I7l1I' CI1aIlctti.
. 11 .
- Januarv ;
t» uc-der toc tliis portiun Ut uie Woc-k- that 1i11.0iVCS tilc: ICC;UI1J[l"lll:l1U11 ut' tile 5cho-
approach to occur easzments from the school district to WSDOT will need to be execute.:.
We will need a construction easement to allaw the eontractor to rebuild the approach u ,
school property as well as an easement to allow a traffic signal pole and related vehic
detection equipment to be placed on the school's property. Once the construction completed, the construction easement would be eI i .i` _ , ? _ -1c", ~i .
signal equipment would need to remain in perpetui
At this time we need to secure your acceptance ot Lhc re-de5ign ut tlle: sCtloU1'5 Suu:'l:
approach to Pines Road to allow design plans to be finalized. If this concept is acceptab:,.
we wrill ask that Inland Pacific Enizineering prepare the final plans for this area and will
ask our Real Estate Services Department to contact you on arranging for the necessar..
easements. Thank you again for cooperation in this matter. if you should have an..
i_l li; ;~S1T~: inri 01C ;I}IOVC jl!,-11~1° 11l jl;lT h:`4,11r1t1r1 C071t:llt T-11C' '11
Martin Wilson, P :
M
cc : Tim Schwab, Inland Pacific Engineeri
Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineer,
Keith Metcalf, WSDOT Project DevelopnlL:nT
Linda Anderson, WSDOT Real Estate Servicc Ted Trepanier, WSDOT Traffic
Larry Eik, WSDOT Project Engineer
Project File. 027-087-08
, •
• r ~~~L/ O
. • • ~
P
,
~
a
,
EX ST.
,
Ri VE U1JAY
~s
f M
~
i . - . ~
. ~
- -
~
4617+ ao ~ a 4618y- Qa
.
D L
- . " _ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '0 7✓ - , 9 ~t ~.,.i~~~ i
, ~ I 55
6 ~
. AREA 9C7 Q 790 S.F. < ~
~ oW ~
7S
. -
APA
~
~
Washington State
~ Departmerrt of Transportation M e m a n d u m
CEI1/Ep
JUN 01; 1998
8POONE COUNT1' ENGINEER
Date: June 1, 1998
From: Greg Figg
Phone: 324-6199 Subject: May 28`h Meeting Notes
To: All Involved Parties
Please find attached my notes from our May28th meeting on the Pines and Euclid left turn
channelization. These notes are not intended to be actual minutes of the nleeting btit
rather to doeument the high points and action ittms that were discus";ed.
Those in attendance:
Robert Bonuccelli F3SA Propertics/Village Propertics
Charles Stocker East Valley School Uistrict # 361
Wes Crosby Property Owner
John Miller DIVCON Inc.
Cathy Ramm Ramm and Associates
Tim Schwab Inland Pacific Engineering
Scott Engelhard Spokane County Engineers
Ray Thompson WSDOT
Chris Damitio WSDOT
Mike Melvin WSDOT
Greg Figg WSDOT
General:
The WSDOT channelization plan was presented to all members present along with th-~ I
cost estimate for the work. Much discussion followed this in regard to the estimate o1
$239.000 for this work which included participation by WSDOT for $39,000. Mr. Miller
inquired about the availability of CERB monies for this project. Ray Thompson will
check on this and let us know. Vir. Bonuccelli inquired if there were any additional
County or State funds available. Mr. Engelhard will check on any County participation in
this project. I replied that the State was already into the project for $39,000 plus the I
design and engineering costs, and additional participation was unlikely. Much more
discussion on project funding follo~ved.
Mr. Bonuccelli suggested that (he State and County look into developing a funding system
similar to what was used by Spol:ane County for the concrete roads on the Westpla.ins b\,,-
the Mcdical Lake interchan`,e. Mr. Envlrhard and mvself will look into this FilIldlll;;
D:%wRDFll.ES1IDCIAL8 ION ROAO'i'uus ukf Eurli.l Mmint d.w
00T 704UO6EF
ReveeO 193
_ J
~
,
system. It was menLioned that property owners who wEre to dedicatt right of way should
receive considecation for this. This issue was discussed and agreed th3i it would be
included for consaderation. T asked what value we should use for consideralion of thas
right of wa►y. Mr. Bonuccelli sud~ested $3 .00 per square foot wou1cl be a lair value for t.his
process. This amount seemed aareecable to all the property owners involved.
The plan depicted a drainage swale area as a result of the new paved area as requiLed by
. Spokane Couney Storrnwater Regulations. Discussion followed regarding the need for
swales and how best to accommodate them. It was suggested tbat this could be loolced at
-ts four separace Projects eliminacing the neecl Fac swales. Due to the facc that tlus project
is being done by WSDOT this would not be feasible to do. Iv1r. Englehard indicated he
would look inco the draina~e rzquirzments imposed by the Couniy for this project. Mr.
Miller said on his property there is a lotW point on the souLh side and wondered if this
could be used in instEad of the proposed strip swale for lus fxontage. vlr. Darrutio Lhought
this wou.ld be fzasible and agreed to work wiCb Mr Miller on this concept.
It was brought Lip tlzat the channelization plaa1 on the south started off of the right of way
controlled by the properry owners crathered together. It was felt that acquiring propertyy
from this parcel would be difficult as it was a small parcel to start with a.iid would add un-
ueeded complexifiy. 1VIr. I?amiuo indicated they wou1d look at moving the starting point
northward to keep the praject on ncrht of cvav controlled by the affectecl parties. Mx.
Engleha.rd will provide assessors maps to ensure Chis stacting point is appropfiately placed.
As part of shifting the scarting point for the two way left turn lane north we will look at
what the inlpaccs to Crosby and Miller sites are. Mr. Damitio is also joing to field veriljr
where thexe is sidewalk is locaczd. -We will replace sidewalk where it currently exists.
IV'Ir Stocker inclicated thac the school is willinb to locate the sadewal.k in its ultimate
location on the school's frontaQe to facilitate this widening. This was agreeable 1o the
project office. Ii was suggested that each devzloper could do a 6' wide strip pave
inr]ependently and these areaS could Ue eVentually linked up to form a widened area. This
area was rzjected for use on State Highways as not ensuring the safety of the motoring
public. '
WSDOT aggreed to leave this channelization work in our current concract while these
issues are bein~ add.ressed. If a~reement cannat be reactied vn these isaues by Septenlber
303 1998 tlie work will be deleted from our upcoming paving project.
Once the above issues can be lookeci into we will reconvene a meetinc, with all-parues.
D:1WRDFII.EJIIMA!-i1lO~ti POAD'Qints und Euoltd NIrccine C~t
I/
INTER C)FFICE MAIL
DNISION C7F ENGINE.ERING
ATTENTION PAT HAR.PER
;i
'kS P O K A N E ~ C O U N T' X
BUItDING AND PLANNING • A DIViS10N OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L MANSON, C B O, DtxECrOR DEtvNIS M. SCO'ri', P E., DIttECrOR
July 2, 1998
Stu Deysen"roth
Adams & Clark Incorporated
1720 West 4`h Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204-1702
RE. West Terrace Business Park - East Area
D car Stu: _
I received your June 16, 1998, letter and agree that your summary represents the key points
discussed at our recent meeting. The tasks specified in your letter are fairly extensive and will
be subject to specific review/implementation through the build.ing permit process and will
require actions by various agencies. Additional information may be required and additional
tasks may be identified through the building permit review process or review of other
plans/studies.
Prior to issuance of building permits or finalization of the Binding Site Plan, the Division of
Building & Planning will verify that all the conditions of approval attached to the underlying
zone reclassification and to the Binding Site Plan have been satisfied.
I look forward to working with you and affected agencies to complete your project. If you
have any questions please contact me at 477-3675.
Sincerely,
ohn Pederson
Senior Planner
JP/lsc
c: Laurie Grimes, Assistant Planning Director
Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Jeff Forry, Senior Permit Technician, Division of Building & Planning
1026 WEST BKOAolNr1Y AVEWE • SPOKANE•, WASt-ItvGTO►v 99260
PHOrrE (509) 456-3675 • 1=At (509) 4564703
TDD (509) 324-3166
PBrceE: 45102,9008
Owner; R1CHARDS, BARBARA
. . , ~ ~
GoOwner.
T
OVMii1BCAdd1'855 ` ,
~
12500 E EUCLlQ AVE SPOKANE WA 9921E-1296
Sfte Address ' -
12500 E EUGLID AVE SPO - ~
Lega! Descriptlfln
10-25-44 E30ROQS OF W50RODS CJF N53113Rt7D5 ClF NUU114 ,`r4~' ~ i
4F NW114
& N26 zraRODs oF rr~E W30RoDs Exc ca Ro
. ..r . Y ' }{~y ~ Y . P
I ~
x
,
Y<x ~ ~ ~E
b
i
.Lt
6 4: „`J A J~G ?afi
4$ d
~ I
M1 rA . . . Y.1
~ r
- - - ~ - ~ t Notr,e: This is np# a fegal docurftnt baRa deptcted on this map is general & subjeci lo cons4ant revisjan, i4 is intended far reference
use 4nly. Legal docurnents should be obtaEned fram ihe 4aqprapriaie agenCy.
Parcel: 45105.9072
Owner. INLAND EMPIRE PAPER COMPANY
CoOwner
~
Owner Address
3320 N ARGONNE RD SPOKANE WA 99212-2001
~ • ~ ~~A ~
Site Address J'`~ •r~
12600 E EUCLID AVE SPO j`~•; ,
I i
Legal Description
10-25-44 iPTN OF NE114 LYG SYVLY OF I.E.P. CA RR RNV SO SURVEYEQ
R/W - ~
RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS OFFICE N0. 634340C OATED ~JUNE 30TH
1972, EXC S 2340FT OF W 200FT & EXC PTN S 940FT OF E
740FT I T ` - 1,7 OF W 940FT 0F NE1/4 LYG N & W OF FUTURE RD RlW~
, -
TOGETHER
WITH N 300FT OF NW1l4 EXC W 990FT THEREOF
' ' y . I .
n
-
r`~~,.,
'
-1~- - - ~ - _ ~ - ~ ~
,1-
~
IT_~~~~~
Notice: This is nol a legal documeni. Data tlepicled on Ihis map is general & subject to canslant revision, li is iniendetl (or reference
use only. Legal dacumencs shauld be abtained irom che appropriate agency.