ZE-0027-01
A ~ I~-
0
.
SPOKANE COUIVTY HEAtIIl1G E lt
RE Zone Reclassification from the UR-3 5 ) FI1VDgNGS OF FAC'T,
Zone to the UR-7 Zone, ) COIVCLgJSIONS OF LAVV,
Applicant Alvin Severson ) AP1D DECISION
File No ZE-27-01 )
)
Tlus matter corrung on for public hearmg on March 6, 2002, the Hearmg Exammer, after
review of the zone reclassification apphcahon and the entue record, and fin(hng good cause
therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision
I FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The application requests a rezone of 56 ac,res of land from theyUrban Residential-3 5(LJR-
° 3 5) zone to the Urban Residenhal-7 (UR-7) zone, to allow the creation of an addihonal lot and
development of an addzhonal duplex on the site
2 The site is located south of and adjacent to Interstate 90, north of and adjacent to Nora
Avenue, in the SW 1/4 of Section S, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Waslungton
3 The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel no 45083 0497 The
duplex uruts on the site are respechvely addressed at 9817 and 9819 E Nora Avenue
4 The sub~ect property is legally descnbed as tlie west 80 00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Woodlo
Heights Add.irion, as per plat thereof recorded m 1952 in Book 2 of Plats, Page 35, records of
Spokane County Auditor, EXCEPT the north 98 00 feet, AND TOGETHER WITH the north
98 00 feet of Lot 1, EXCEPT the east 123 feet thereof, AND INCLUDING that porhon of Block
298, Opporhuuty, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, lying southerly
of Pnmary State Highway 2, and easterly of the westerly line of said Lot 1, extended northerly to
said lughway, EXCEPT the east 123 feet thereof, situate in the County of Spokane, State of
Washuigton
5 The applicant and the site owner is Alvin Severson, 12807 South Starr Road, Rockford,
WA 99030
6 The Heanng Exammer heard the applicahon pursuant to the County Heanng Exam.iner
Ordinance (County Resoluhon No 96-0171) and the County Heanng Examuler Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294)
7 The requuements for notice of public hearmg were met
8 The Heanrig Exarruner conducted a site visit on March 5, 2002 and Apnl 2, 2002
9 A public heanrig was held on the proposed rezone on March 6, 2002
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 1
r
t
10 The following persons testified at the public heanng
Jason Langbehn A1 Severson
Division of Planrung 12807 South Starr Road
1026 West Broadway Rockford, WA 99030
Spokane, WA 99260
I)onna and Ron Tweedy
9803 East Nora
Spokane, WA 99206
11 The County Division of Planiung issued a Determination of Nonsigiuficance for the proJect
on March 1, 2002
12 The Heanng Examuier takes notice of the County Generahzed Comprehensive Plan, GMA
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan, GMA Comprehensive Plan map, Phase I
~ Development Regulahons, County Resoluhon Nos 1-1033 and 2-0037, County Artenal Road
Plan maps, 2001 County Standards for Road and Sewer Construchon, County official zorung
maps, County Zonuig Code, County Code, other apphcable development regulations, and pnor
land use decisions m the vicuuty
13 The record includes the documents in the project file at the time of the pubhc heanrig, the
documents and testimony submitted at the public heanrig, and the items taken notice of by the
Heanng Examiner
14 The subject property is approxunately 56 acres in size, relatively flat m topography, and
rectangular in shape The south half of the site is developed with a duplex, with a fenced rear
yard A sephc system drainfield extends from the fenced rear yard of the duplex into the north
half of the site Pubhc sewer was recently extended to the subject property The duplex has an
intenor space of approxunately 2,424 square feet and an attached garage of approximately 638
square feet The duplex is accessed from Nora Avenue
15 The site plan of record for the proposed rezone submitted on December 18, 2001 illustrates
the existing unprovements on the site, the setbacks from the exishng duplex to adjouung
property luies, and proposed division of the site at its midpoint from east to west The site plan
shows a 20-foot wide access easement extending along the north boundary of the adjacent
property to the east, from the northeast corner of the site to Woodruff Rd, for a total distance of
123 feet
16 The site was created through the certificate of exemption process in 1995, by dividing three
tax parcels, including the land occupied by the site and the corner lot lying directly east of the
south half of the site, into two tax parcels compnsed of the current site and said corner lot
17 Effective January 1, 1991, the zoiung of the site was reclassified from the Agncultural
Suburban zone of the now expired County Zoiung Ordinance to the Urban Residential-3 5(UR-
3 5) zone, under the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zotung Code The site is also
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 2
~
located in the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay zone and the Pubhc Transit Benefit Area designated by
the Zorung Code
18 In 1998, the UR-3 5 zone was amended to increase the allowable density (net) in such zone
from 3 5 dwelling uiuts per acre to 4 35 dwelluig uruts per acre See County Resoluhon No 98-
0482
19 The rezone application, environmental checklist, site plan of record and application fees
were submitted on December 18, 2001 The apphcation is sub~ect to the land use processing
requirements m County Resolution No 1-0700 The County Division of Plannmg issued a
deternunation of completeness for the rezone application on December 27, 2001 The
completeness date for the application was December 18, 2001
20 On November 5, 2001, pursuant to the State Growth Management Act (GMA), the County
adopted a new Comprehensive Plan ("GMA Comprehensive Plan"), Urban Growth Area (UGA)
boundanes and a Caprtal Facilities Plan See County Resoluhon No 1-1059
21 On January 15, 2002, the County unplemented the GMA Comprehensive Plan, UGA and
Capital Facihries Plan, and adopted Phase I Development Regulations to implement such plans
The County also repealed the intenm development regulations and mtenm urban growth area
(IUGA) boundanes previously adopted by the County under the State Growth Management Act
See County Resolution No 2-0037
22 The site and surrouncling land are designated ixi the County's UGA boundanes Pnor to
January 15, 2002, the site and such surrounding land were designated mside the County's IUGA
boundanes
23 Under the Phase I Development Regulations, a complete rezone application subrrutted
before January 15, 2002, that pertauis to land located within the UGA and that is "inconsistent"
with the GMA Comprehensive Plan may be processed under the comprehensive plan and land
use regulations in effect when the application became complete If the rezone application is
approved, the new zoning is effective for a penod of one (1) year If a complete building pernut
application is subnutted dunng the 1-year penod, the property may be developed under the
approved buildmg pernut subJect to the condihons of the rezone After the 1-year penod, the
zorung of the property would "cross over" back to the UR-3 5 zone
24 The GMA Comprehensive Plan designates the site, and the land lying north/northwest,
south, east and west of the site, in the Low Density Residential category The land lying
northeast of the site, across Interstate 90, is designated in the Light Industnal category Under
the Phase I Development Regulations, the crossover zone for all land in the Low Density
Residential category zoned UR-3 5 pnor to January 15, 2002 is the UR-3 5 zone
25 The proposed zoning for the site, UR-7, is inconsistent with the crossover zone (UR-3 5)
for the site under the Phase I Development Regulations Accordsngly, if the current rezone
application is approved, the apphcant would have one (1) year to subnut a complete apphcation
for a building pernut to develop the site under the conditions of the rezone If the builduig
permit apphcation is timely submitted and a biulcluig permit issued, the site can be developed
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 3
1
under the conditions of the rezone, notwithstanding crossover zonuzg of the site to the UR-3 5
zone after the one (1)-year penod See Resolution No 2-0037
26 The Phase I Development Regulations requue any rezone applications submitted under the
GMA Comprehensive Plan and Phase I regulations to be consistent vcith the GMA
Comprehensive Plan category for the property, and with the implementmg zone set forth in the
Phase I regulations for such category
27 The unplementing zone for the Low Density Residential category of the GMA
Comprehensive Plan is either the UR-3 5 zone or the Urban Residenhal-7 ([JR-7) zone,
provided, if the UR-7 zone is used the density of new development may not exceed a residential
(net) density of six (6) dwelling uruts per acre Accordingly, any future rezone applications
submitted for the site under the Phase I regulations would be luYUted to a rezone to either the UR-
3 5 zone or the UR-7 zone, provided, any rezone to the UR-7 zone is lunited to a residential
density of six (6) dwellulg uruts per acre
, 28 The Examuier must consider the current rezone apphcanon under the comprehensive plan
and development regulations m effect on December 28, 2001, the date when the apphcahon
became complete Tlus mcludes the old Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), County
Zorung Code, 2001 County Road Standards, Cnncal Areas Orduiance, mtenm development
regulanons for land located inside the County's IUGA boundanes, and other development
regulahons in effect on December 18, 2001
29 The County Zoiung Code luYUts the maximum residential density ui the UR-7 zone to
seven (7) dwelluig uruts per acre, " except as provided or allowed by mirumum lot sizes and
bonus density provisions of tlus Code" See Zoning Code 14 618 305 The mirumum lot size for
duplex uruts in the UR-7 zone is 11,000 square feet per lot See Zonuig Code 14 618 310
30 The Staff Report ambiguously states the size of the srte to be 23,807 square feet and 28,807
square feet The 1995 cerhficate of exemphon descnbed the site as being 23,807 square feet in
size The site has a uruform width of 80 feet, but the length of the property increases gradually
from west to east The area of the site can be deternuned by multiplying the width of the site by
the average length of the site The dunensions of the site illustrated on the County Assessor's
map for Sechon 8 in the project file indicate a site of approxunately 24,326 square feet The site
plan indicates a site of approxunately 24,515 square feet Based on the County Assessor's map,
the Examiner finds the site to be approxunately 24,326 square feet, or approximately 56 acres in
size
31 In December, 2001, the owner of the parcel abutting the north half of the site conveyed to
the applicant an easement for access and utilihes across the northerly 20 feet of such parcel
32 The Wash.ington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is in the process of
purchasing the northerly five (5) feet of the site and adjacent property to the east and west, to
allow construction of an 8-10 foot lugh noise wall along the south side of Interstate 90 (I-90), in
consideration of the widenulg of I-90 freeway by WSDOT in the area See e-mail dated 2-26-02
from Jason Langbehn to Gregg Figg, and e-mail dated 2-27-02 from Gregg Figg to Jason
Langbehn
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 4
te
33 The apphcant's 20-foot wide easement in the adjacent property to the east will be reduced
to 15 feet when WSDOT acquires the northerly five (5) feet of such property However,
WSDOT will acquire an addinonal five (5)-foot wide easement for the applicant from the
adjacent property to the east, whlch will be added to the 15-foot wide easement the applicant will
otherwise retaui through the adjacent property to the east Tlus will give the applicant a 20-foot
wide easement through the adjacent property to the east to Woodruff Road The apphcant plans
to install concrete or gravel on such easement for access
34 The site will be reduced in size to approximately 24,300 square feet after WSDOT acquires
the northerly five (5) of the subject property See County Assessor's map for Section 8
35 If the reduced site of 24,300 square feet is developed with an addrtional duplex, the
residential density (net) of the site would be approximately 7 2 dwelhng uiuts per acre The
reduced site can be divided mto two (2) duplex parcels, each of wluch exceed the minimum lot
size of 11,000 square feet reqtured for a duplex in the UR-7 zone Since each lot would meet the
minunum lot size for a duplex in the UR-7 zone, the density requirements of the UR-7 zone can
be met; even though the overall density of the site would exceed seven (7) dwellmg uruts per
acre A short plat is required to divide the site mto two (2) parcels
36 The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The site is also
designated in the Aquifer Sensihve Area, Pnonty Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area
37 The land lyuig south, east and west of the site is zoned UR-3 5, and is pnmanly developed
with single-farruly homes at urban densities, in subdivisions platted in the 1950s Some duplexes
are found in the vicimty Add.ihonal housing is in the process of being added east of Woodruff
Road m the vicimty See testunony of Alvui Severson The Interstate 90 (I-90) freeway hes
duectly north of the site and the land 1}nng east and west of the site The land lyuig north and
northwest of the site, across I-90, is zoned UR-3 5 and developed wlth smgle-family homes The
land lying northeast of the site, across I-90, is zoned Light Industnal (I-2) and developed for
indusmal uses
38 The County Artenal Road Plan designates Mission Street, which hes over 800 feet to the
south, as a Minor Artenal Nora Avenue, Woodruff Road and other streets in the neighborhood
are considered Local Access roads
39 The project would be served by a high level of urban services and facilities, including
pubhc sewer and water, and modern utilities Tlus unplements the pohcies of the Urban
category, as well as the purpose and intent statement of the UR-7 zone, regarding urban
development Public sewer availabihty is required for new development located within the
County's IUGA boundanes County Resoluhon No 97-0864
40 The site meets the defuution of "fill-ul" development in the Urban category, since it is
located between and in close proxunity to at least two developed geograpluc areas having
densities and land uses confornung to the land use categones of the Comprehensive Plan
designated for such areas, and also because the development will aid in the cost-effectiveness of
utilihes and pubhc facihhes and services See Comprehensive Plan, glossary and Decision
Guideline 1 1 a
HE Fmdings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 5
~
41 The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that a multi-family
development exceeding three (3) residential uruts should be located along artenals rather than
along intenor neighborhood streets See Decision Guideline 1 13 This policy does not apply to
the proposal, since a duplex has only two (2) residenhal uruts
42 Decision Guideline 1 14 of the Urban category recommends development of a vanety of
densities and residential uses, to provide a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas with varying
densities, combmahons or riux of uses
43 Decision Gi,udeline 15 1 recommends that buffenng andlor landscaping be used to nuhgate
the differences between proposed development and existing uses Decision Gu.ideline 15 8 of
the Urban category recommends that the height and arclutectural character of new structures be
considered in evaluating whether a proposal will change the existing land use cbaracter of an
area Other relevant policies of the Urban category are hsted in the Staff Report
44 Support for the proposal was expressed by the applicant, the renter (Demarcus) of one of
the duplex wuts on the site, and the owner (Comett) of the residence located directly east of the
north half of the current site
45 The resident owners of 14 homes located wnthin 400 feet of the subject property expressed
opposihon to the proposal This included the five (5) homes lying duectly west of the site, each
on whlch are located on parcels, or double parcels owned by the same owner, that extend
between Nora Avenue and I-90, four (4) homes located duectly north and northwest of the srte,
along the south side of Nora Avenue, the home located directly east of the south half of the site,
at the northwest corner of the intersection of Nora Avenue and Woodruff Road, three (3) homes
located along the east side of Woodruff Road, north of Nora Avenue, and the home located at the
southeast corner of the intersection of Woodruff and Nora See petinon dated January 6, 2002,
and parcel informahon in public notice packet
46 Project opponents expressed numerous concerns regazding the proposal, includmg the
inconsistency of the "multi-faauly" character and residential density of the proposed duplex
with the single-farruly homes in the vicuuty, inadequate vehicular and fire/emergency access
along the easement that would serve the proposed new duplex, in terms of width, surfacing, and
maintenance, traffic volume and safety impacts to neighborhood streets, possible use of the
easement by third persons for dumping, lortenng or to commit property cnmes, loss of access
across the site between Woodruff Road and the rear yards of residences located west of the site,
adverse impacts to already liiruted on-street parlcing in the vicuuty, potenhal for increased cnme
and lowenng of property values in the neighborhood, based on the rental character of the
proposed new duplex, establishment of a precedent for sinulaz rental housing, and other
concerns
47 There is insufficient information in the record for the Exanuner to deternune whether
property owners west of the srte have a deeded or prescnpnve access easement across the
southerly 15 feet of the site and the parcel located between the site and Woodruff Road if such
easement nght(s) exists, the applicant cannot restnct them, and may be requued to improve the
20-foot wide easement obtained across the adjacent property to the east to a pnvate road
standard See 2001 County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, subsections 3 22 and
3 08 A condition of approval has been added m this regard
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 6
r
48 Spokane County Fire Distnct 1 commented that existing fire hydrants and access were
adequate for the proposed rezone County Engineermg did not object to the access proposed by
the applicant for the site
49 County Engineering condihons require the applicant to panccipate in a future road
unprovement dismct for the improvement of Nora Avenue along the frontage of the site,
including the installation of addihonal asphalt, and curb and sidewalk Such conditions also
requue the apphcant to submit a parlang and traffic circulation plan for the site, for approval by
County Engzneenng m accordance with standard engineenrig prachces
50 Zomng Code 14 802 020 requires duplexes to provide off-street parkuig as requued m
Zomng Code 14 802 040 Zorung Code 14 802 040 specifies off-street parlang for single-fanuly
homes (two spaces per dwelling, wluch may be stacked in dnveway), and multifarruly dwellings
(15 spaces per dwellmg), but does not address duplexes The Zotung Code dishngRUShes
between "dwelling, two-fanuly (duplex)" and "dwelling, mulh-fanuly" See Zoiung Code
14 300 100 The parlcing standards are accorduigly ambiguous as to parking requuements for ~
duplexes ~
51 The Staff Report indicates that 15 parkmg spaces are requued for each duplex utut in the
proposal The Exanuner takes nohce that in the past County Planrung has construed a duplex,
for the purpose of Zotung Code 14 802 040, as two (2) smgle-fanuly dwellings The Exammer
also finds that at least two parking spaces are needed to serve each duplex urut, to assure
adequate off-street parking on the site Accordulgly, each duplex urut is required to provide two
parkuig spaces, wluch may be stacked in the dnveway
52 The existing duplex on the site is served by a two (2)-car garage and dnveway, wluch can
accommodate at least four (4) cars See photo of site m Exhibit C The new duplex would be
requued to provide at least four (4) parking spaces
53 No evidence of a traffic engineering nature was subnutted to indicate that traffic from the
proposal would have any sigruficant adverse unpact on traffic capacity or safety along the roads
serving the proposal Traffic levels appear relatively light along Nora Avenue and Woodruff
Road in the vicuuty
54 Opponents of the project did not submit any competent evidence that the proposal would
adversely vnpact property values The value of the site with the existuig duplex appears to be
comparable to or exceed the value of neighbonng homes See Exlubit C
55 Zoning Code 14 618 365 requues the applicant to install a six (6)-foot high solid wall, solid
landscapmg or sight-obscunng fence along the east and west boundanes of the site new duplex
lot that would be created by the applicant, except that such screeiung must be reduced to a height
of three (3) feet in the front yards of the two duplex lots that will result from division of the site
Tlus requirement has been added as a condition of approval
56 Opponents of the project did not subnut convincing evidence that subsequent development
of an additional duplex on the site for rental purposes would increase cnme in the vicmity, or that
development of an access easement along the north border of the parcel abutnng the site to the
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 7
ii
east to serve such duplex would encourage httenng, loiteruig or theft by tlurd persons along such
easement No problems have been noted with past or current tenants of the exishng duplex on
the site
57 Approval of the rezone would not necessanly establish a precedent for other rezones to the
UR-7 zone in the vicuuty The site is not an optimal location for single-family housmg
considenng its proximity to the I-90 freeway, which is being widened by the addition of travel
lanes adjacent to the subject property The adoption of the Phase I Development Regulations and
designation of the area in the Low Density category of the GMA Comprehensive Plan increases
the potential for rezones to the UR-7 zone at densities not exceeding six (6) dwelling uruts per
acre in the area
58 The project has been conditioned for compliance with the development standards of the
UR.-7 zone and other apphcable provisions of the County Zorung Code, and the
recommendahons of the commentuig public agencies As condihoned, the project wnll be
reasonably companble vvitli, and not have a significant negahve unpact on, neighbonng land
uses ~
59 No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsigmficance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the County Division of Planrung The proposal, as modified, will not have more
than a moderate effect on the quality of the envuonment, and the Examiner concurs wnth
issuance of t11e DNS
60 Changed conditions have occurred since the zorung of the site was re-designated to the
UR-3 5 zone on January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County
Zorung Code Tlus includes the availability of public sewer in the area, expansion of the I-90
freeway adjacent to the site, increased residential growth m the area, designation of the site in the
Urban Growth Area and Low Density Residential category, and adopnon of the Phase I
Development Regulations
Based on the above finduigs of fact, the Heanng Examiner enters the following
H CorrcLusaONs OF LAvv
1 The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, generally conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan
2 The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, bears a substantial relanonship, and will
not be detnmental, to the public health, safety or welfare
3 A change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant the
proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned A substantial change of cucumstances has
occurred in the area since the site was last zoned
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-41 Page 8
~
4 The procedural requirements of the State Envuonmental Policy Act and the County's Loca1
Environmental Ordinance have been met The proposal, as conditioned and modified, will not
have a significant, probable adverse unpact on the envuonment
5 The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, meets the cntena established by
Waslungton case law for approving a rezone, and the cntena estabhshed in paragraphs
14 402 020 (1)(2) of the County Zonuig Code for amending the County official zoning map
6 Approval of the land use application is appropnate under section 11 of the County Heanng
Exammer Ordinance, adopted by County Resolution No 96-0171
III IDECISIOIV
Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the apphcation for a rezone
to the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of approval
_ of the public agencies stated below -r- Q1 _ _ 3
Any condihons of such agencies that have been added or sigmficantly revised by the
Heanng Exammer are itahcazed
Failure to comply with the cond.itions of this approval may result in revocahon of tlus
approval by the Heanng Exammer Tlus approval does not wa.ive the applicant's obligahon to
comply vvith all other reqwrements of other agencies with j unsdlction
SPOKANE COUN'I'Y DMSI0N OF PI.AIVNI1o1G
1 All condzhons imposed by the Heanng Exammer shall be bmdmg on the "Appllcant",
wluch term shall include the owner(s) and developer(s) of the property, and theu heirs, assigns
and successors
2 Tlus approval applies to the property currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel
no 45083 0497, as legally descnbed in an attachment to the rezone apphcahon in County
Division of Plannuig File No ZE-27-01
3 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, the Aqiufer Sensitive
Overlay zone, and all other apphcable provisions of the Spokane County Zorung Code, as
amended
4 At least two (2) off-street parkcng spaces shall be provaded per dwelling unat for each
duplex dwelling located on the site
5 Screenzng shall be provaded on the boundaries of the entare site that abut Urban
Resadenttal-3 5 (UR-3 S) zoning (i e currently the east and west boundaries of the sate) an
accordance with Section 14 618 365 of the County Zoning Code as amended
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 9
~
6 The applacant shall not restract any lawful access rights that may exist across the north end
of the site or the adjacent parcel to the east for the benefit of the propertzes lying west of the
subject property If such access rights are found to extst the applacant rnay be required to
develop the proposed access extendang from the north end of the szte to Woodruff Road to pravate
road standards as applicable under the 2001 County Standards for Road and Sewer
Construction
7 Any division of subject property shall comply with the Spokane County Subdivision
Ordinance, as amended
8 Pursuant to Section I of the Phase I Development Regulahons, as adopted on January 15,
2002 by County Resolunon No 2-0037, the zone reclassification to the Urban Residential-7
(LTR-7) shall be effective for one (1) year until Apn13, 2002, after wh.ich tune the zorung of the
site will crossover to the new Zonuig Map Designanon per the crossover matnx of the Phase I
Development Regulahons, i e the Urban Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5)
9 To develop the subject property under the UR-7 zone, a complete apphcation for a building
pernut must be subnutted by no later than Apn13, 2002 If a tunely and complete application is
subrrutted by such date, the site may be developed in accordance with the building pemut issued
for such application, subject to the condihons of approval of tlus zone reclassification
10 The Division of Plamung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Audrtor a Title
Notice, which notes that the property m question is subject to a vanety of special conditions
unposed as a result of approval of a land use action Tlus Title Nonce shall serve as public
notice of the conditions of approval affechng the properiy in question The Title Notice should
be recorded withn the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, m
full or in part, by the Division of Plaruung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows
"The parcel of property legally descnbed as the west 80 00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Woodlo
Heights Addihon, as per plat thereof recorded in Book 2 of Plats, Page 35, records of Spokane
County Auditor, EXCEPT the north 98 00 feet, AND TOGETHER WITH the north 98 00 feet of
Lot 1, EXCEPT the east 123 feet thereof, AND INCLUDING that porhon of Block 298,
Opporturuty, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, lying southerly of
Pnmary State Highway 2, and easterly of the westerly line of said Lot 1, extended northerly to
said highway, EXCEPT the east 123 feet thereof, situate ui the County of Spokane, State of
Washuigton, is the subject of a zone reclassification approved by the Spokane County Heanrig
Exanuner on Apn13, 2002, which imposed a vanety of special development condihons File No
ZE-27-01, pertaimng to such action, is available for inspection and copyuig in the Spokane
County Division of Planrung "
SP0KA1o1E COUN7CY BUI~DING ANI) COI)E ENF'ORCEMENT
1 The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admuustered/enforced as authonzed
by the state Bu.ildmg Code Act Design/development concerns include addressmg, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibihty, construchon type,
occupancy classification, existing extenor wall protection and energy code requirements
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 10
~
SPOI{ANE DIiISI0N OF ENGINEERING ANI) ROADS
Pr'or to release off a bagildmg pernut or use of tlne property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer
2 A pazkuig plan and traffic cuculahon plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Enguieer The design, location and arrangement of parkuig stalls shall be m accordance
with standard engineenrig practices
3 To construct the roadway improvements stated herem, the apphcant may, with the approval
of the County Enguleer, join m and be wrllmg to participate in any pehtion or resolution wluch
purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) for said improvement pursuant to
chapter 36 88-IRCW, as amended Spokane County will not participate m the cost of these - J
nnprovements Tlus provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
4 As an altemative method of constructmg the road unprovements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Enguieer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein
by joining and participahng in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required
unprovement Spokane County vvill not participate ui the cost of these improvements This
provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
5 The County Enguieer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the unprovement
of Woodruff Road, which provides direct access to the proposed development Tlus will require
the installation of 30 feet of asphalt Curbmg and sidewalk must also be constructed
6 All requued unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washuigton Standard
Specifications for Road and Bndge construchon and other applicable County standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertauung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construchon, unless otherwise approved by the County Enguieer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway secnons and drauiage plan requuements are found m
Spokane County Resolution No 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
8 No construction work is to be performed wYtlun the existing or proposed nght of way until
a pernut has been issued by the County Englneer All work witlun the public road nght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engmeer
9 The applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6", which specifies
the following
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits
now or to be hereafter denved, do for themselves, their heus, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
in interest hereby request and authonze Spokane County to include the above descnbed property
in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement
HE Fmdings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 11
~
Distnct for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below, by requesting and authonzmg Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petitton for the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct
pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requesting and authonzing Spokane County to cast their
ballot in favor of a RID being fonned under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030,
andlor by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternahve
resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below, said owner(s) and
successor(s) fu.rther agree (1) that the unprovements or construchon contemplated witlun the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be denved from the formation of the RID
by the property included therem, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formahon of the RID, and (3) that the property vvithin the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed, provided, they, and theu heus, grantees, assigns and successor(s), shall
retaui the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunchon wnth the formahon of a RID by
either the petition or resoluhon method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Supenor
Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirnung the final assessment roll,
provided further, it is recogruzed that actual assessments may vary from assessment estunate so '
long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fau- value unprovement(s)
add(s) to the property
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such tune as a RID is created or any County
Road Improvement project is authonzed by Spokane County, the unprovements required shall be
at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participahon by Spokane County
The RID waiver contau►ed in tlus agreement sha11 expue after ten (10) years from the date
of execution below Tlus provision is apphcable to Woodruff Road "
10 The apphcant is advised that there may exist uhlities either underground or overhead
affechng the applicant's property, mcludulg property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County wnll assume no financial obhgahon for adjustments or relocation
regardzng these uhlities The applicant should contact the applicable uhlrties regard.ing
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work
SPOKA1VE REGION~ HEALTH I)ISTISICT
1 The sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by tbe Duector of Utilities, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Uttlities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by a.n existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 12
5 The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolubited
SPOKANE C0UNTY I)IVISION OF UTELITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-unde Public Sewer System is to be constructed
A sewer connection pernut is reqwred Commercial developments shall subrrut histoncal andlor
estimated water usage pnor to the issuance of the connection pernut in order to establish sewer
fees
2 The applicant shall submrt expressly to Spokane County Division of Utihnes "under
separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specificahons for the public
sewer connections and facilihes for review and approval Commercial developments sha11
submit histoncal and/or estunated water usage as part of the sewer plan subnuttal
3 Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utihties shall be submitted pnor to the issuance
of the sewer connection permit
4 Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made pnor to the issuance
of sewer connection pernut Sewer charges may mclude special connection charges and general
facilihes charges Charges may be substantial dependmg upon the nature of the development
5 Any water service for this project shall be provlded in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 13
14
DATED this 3' day of Apnl, 2002
S~OKANE COiJNTY HEARING E ER
/Ki ~ r
4-('ic el C Dempsey, WSBA # 3
NOTgC~ OF FINAL DIECISgON AND 1V07rICE OF R][GH'I' TO APPEAI.,
Pursuant to Spokane County Resoluhon Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, as modified by County
Resolution No 1-0700, the decision of the Heanng Exarruner on an application for a zone
reclassification is final and conclusive unless within fourteen (14) calendar days from the
Exarxuner's wntten decision, a party of record aggneved by such decision files an appeal with the
Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washulgton
This decision was mazled by certified mail to the Apphcant, and by regular masl to other
parties of record, on Apn13, 2002 THE APPIEAL CLOSING DATE IS APRIL 11, 2002
The complete record in tlus matter, including tlus decision, is on file dunng the appeal
penod with the Office of the Heanrig Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Builduzg, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Waslungton, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be
inspected dunng normal working hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except
holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m Copies of the documents in the record
will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County
Pursuant to RCW 36 70B 130, affected properly owners may request a change in valuation
for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation
HE Findmgs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-01 Page 14
ENGINEER'S REVIEW 5HEET
f'roject Stacus Active
As }3uilz P1ans fteceived RQZOIIe Flje 1" .
ZE- f~~-01
Raad I'lans Approwed
+C'onipanicin Fsles.
New Road Standarsis 5-1 -5-95 Mylar r:
ftelated Files:
Clearing,t 0310612002 I0:30 Builciing Dept;
't'echnical Revtew: i:l 11! 7/2UL12 2: ] 7
Harvat'd Rd Plan C`E-ng Speciat Fees
Prelirninary fteview: "I'}pe: ❑ Large Lot Bldg. Square Feet
Date Itecesvs:d: 1213 ] 120(11
INo. Luts: No. Acres: Q.
Froject Name LTR-3.5 T{) UR-? I)TJPLEX
Site Address S. 190, E. I.OCUST, N. NQRA, W. WOODRL-FT,
Applirant Range-Torvnshrp-5eelion: 44 - 25 - 08 PAFtCEL(S): (lir5t 20)
Aivin A 5eversaji Cpnditions Iw9ailed: 45083.(}447
Flood Zone hIu
12807 S. Starc Rd Water Saurc~:
k'.,<i,i:;,
IZQCI'~~ORD. W1'1 99030- SeweF SoGf+.,_
l'hone (509) 2914070 (504) 889-7995 Sclxaal C3ist 3i:
Fire Dist 01
P'hane I)i5[
Eng Billirsg Owner
Alvin A Sc;versors Alvin A Seversun
12807 S. Starr Rd 12807 S. Starr Rci Survcyor I
Charles E Ssnilxsun
ROCKFC)RD,WA 994317- R4C[{FURD,1WA 99030- SIMPS{7N ENGC]"3EERS 1NC
~,~~n~
}~I1Qfi]~L (509) 2914070 (509) 889-79'~S (509) 2914070 (309) 589-7995 909 N. Argunnc. Rd
SFOKANE, WA 99212-2789
N'hone (5(}9) 926-1322
Signed Name: AL A SEVEF2SOIv' Fax (504) 926-1323
auildiaig 477-3675 1P1annsng 477-7200 lEnginc.er 477-3600 Contact B/P J,ASC3N LANCI3EH]"`4 Contact Lng SCC3TT ENGELHAKD
Date Submitted Aescriptian I.nitials
Eng Necd Technically Comp9ete Eng Neecf Harvard Rd Mitigafiiin
Eng Need Drainag4 Plans Eng Need Traffic Anaiysis Eng Neeci Other
12147f2001 Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Fng F'inal Plat Fees Cnmpleted
Copy to AeccrunCing
Eng Agreee Priority Fees Received 12119/2001 Eng Prelim 1'lat Cees Compleiec3
I"Zotice to PubIic / Notice to Pubiic # l 3 4 6 Completed - ar Needs to be signed I
Desi«n Deviation Dates (ln4)ut)r' . - , , - -
o+f ~ ~ l e
Tan-tl tji.].sr;te5 1'{3f'
drainage ite~11 calcUlatecl
Hearing Date Decision App w" Den Concf ApplLl i 32V
Appealed io BCC Qeeision App Den Cond Apli1(f f- ourt
Appealed to Court Llr:cssion App Den Cvnd Appld
f f Stampe:d Mylars tu Secretary (5andy) I
/ / Stamped 208 Lot Paans to Secretary (Sandv) I
ENGINEER4SRIDVIEW SHEET
Projeet 5ta[us Activc
As 8u€lt P1ans Receivcd Rezone File ZE-0027"01 -01
Ruad Plans Approved C"ornpanion Fiies:
New Roaci Standards 5-15-95 Nzylar
Re1ated 1=ilcs:
i-iraring: i3ui1ding dept:
'rech,jica~ Review: 01i17/2002 2.15 I I 1-Iarvard iZd Ylan I_f Eng Speeiai Fees
Preliminary Reviedv, Type: 7] Larrge LoY B1dg. Square Fs;et
l7ate Fteceiveci: 12131I2001
No. Lots: No. Acres: 0,55
Praject Name UK-3.5 T(]► iTR-7 DUPLEX ,
S'rte 11ddress S. 190, E. LOCUST, N. tVC_?IiA, W. V1IE)ODRUFF,
~~pplicant p-,~~~ ,by41QRange-To.+rnship-Sectiun: 44- 25-~8 PAIiCEL(5): (first 20)
AIvin A Severson C'onditions Maited: -TI~Se~,rj 45083.0497
T'Ioac# Zcstie Nu
12807 S. Starr Rd Water Source PuUlic
ROCh'.FClRD, WA 99430- Sewer Source
PhQne (509) 291-4070 (509) 889-7995 Schuerl Dist 363 ~
Fire Uist O1
C'hone Dist
wner
O
~.ng Billing Alvin A Severs~n
;+~IV1T3 A 5et~eS°S17T1
12807i S. S'Er`lf7 j1'd
Sill`~'t~`QC
~ ~~'~r ~Jf31T ~Zf~
C:har€es E Simpsan
RC)Cl.IµORi~, WA ~~9030- S1Mf'S4N ENGINEERS I~iC
[ICKFURD, WA ~~9~30- ~~-799~ c
1'IiQnc (~cj9) 29i~07U (5t39) 88)-79)5 Phone (509) 291-~070 (509) 8894) N. Argonne Rd
SPQKANE, WA 99212-27$9
Phune (509) 926-1322
Sig:ied Name: AI. A SEVE:RSON C'ax (509) 926-1323
Builciirz- 477-3675 1Plarrning 477-7200 lEngsncer 477-3600 Gontact al[' Jt+►5ON [ ANC;BE[-IN Contact Env S+CQTT ENGELFlARL3
Uate Submitted Descriptipn Init'rals
Eng Neeci Technically Complete Eng Need Narvarci Rd Nlitigation
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Nc.ed TrafFic Analysis Eng Neeci {Jther
121I712001 Eng A„grree Pay Fees fteceived F.ng Fina] Plac F+ees Carrrpleted
Copy to Accaranting
Lng Agree Pri4rity Fees Receiveci 1211912001 Eng Preiim I'lat Fees Campleted
Notice tc, Pubtic / Noiice to PubTic # l 3 4 G C ai-npleled - or Neids to be signed
Dcsign Ueviation Dates (In-0ut)
/ l l I 1 1 MRd quai7ties toi
drairiage item csiculatwd
f-icaring Date Decision .r1pp Dcn- CQnd Appid BC('
Appealed lo BCG Decissvn App Den Cond Appld Caurt
.Appealed to Court Decisiun App I)en Cond .Appld
Stamped h+fylars tca Secretary (Sanciy) .
,l Scampcd 208 LOf Plans to 5ecre[ary (SandY)
. • ~ ~ e `t~ I
l STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE ZE-27-01
III ~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOKAT~ CIOUNUY
HEARING DATE: March 6, 2002 @ 10:30 a.m. FILE ZE-27-01
PROJECT PLANNER: Jason Langbehn, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residentiai-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-7 (UR-7) on approximately .54 acres for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-
7 (UR-7) zone.
Project Data
Project Location: The subject site is generally located south of and
adjacent to Interstate - 90 (I-90) and north of and ,
adjacent to Nora Ave. in a portion of the SW of
Section 8, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM. The site
address(es) are: 9817 & 9819 E. Nora Ave. -
Parcel Number(s): 45083.0497
Owner: Alvin Severson
12807 S. Starr Rd.
Rockford, WA 99030
(509) 291-4070
Applicant: 5ame
Old Comprehensive Plan Urban
Desjgnation: ~
New Comprehensive Plan Low Density Residential
Designation (Implemented January
15, 2002):
Zoninq: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Existing Land Use: The subject parcel is developed with an existing
duplex and attached garage.
Syi-rot4nding Zoning and Land Uses:
• North: Zoning to the north of the site consists of Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in
1953 (ZE-321-53). Land use to the north of the site is
Interstate - 90 (I-90).
* South: Zoning to the south of the site consists of Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in
1953 (ZE-321-53). Land use to the south of the site
consists of single-family residential.
• East: Zoning to the east of the site consists of Urban
zE-27-01 ~
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing 1 of 6
. Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, +
~ previously classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in
1953 (ZE-321-53). Land use to the east of the site
consists of single-family residential.
• West: Zoning to the west of the site consists of Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in
1953 (ZE-321-53). Land use to the west of the site
consists of single-family residential.
Recent land use actions in There are no recent land use actions in the vicinity of
surrounding area: the subject site applicable to the proposed zone
reclassification.
Land Division Status: The subject property is a Legal Lot of Record created
by Certificate of Exemption on October 4, 1995 (See
file No. CE-665-95 A& B).
Shoreline Designation: Not applicable (NA)
Water Purveyor: Modern Electric Water Company
Sewage Disposal: The subject site will be served by the Spokane
County public sewer system.
Fire District Spokane County Fire protection District No. 1
School District and Nearest Schoots: The proposal is located in the West Valley School
District No. 363. Schools located nearest to the
proposal are Ness Elementary and Millwood
Elementary.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The subject property is located south of and adjacent
to Interstate - 90 (I-90) and north of and adjacent to
Nora St. Interstate - 90 (I-90) is designated a State
Highway and Nora St. is designated a Local Access
St. Mission St. is located approximately 850 south of
the subject site and is designated a Minor Arterial
Neighborhood Association: None Known
• This proposal is located inside the Urban Growth Area (UGA).
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation 6enefit Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural
Resource Lands.
• This proposal is not located within a Joint Planning Area (JPA).
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject property is located within the
Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone.
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas: No priority wildlife species are located on
the site per the Spokane County Critical
Areas Maps.
Floodplain: A review of the FIRM maps indicates that
the proposal is not located in a floodplain.
Geoiogically Hazardous Areas: No Geologically Hazardous Areas were
identified on the Spokane County
Geologically Hazardous Area Map.
Wetlands: ~ No wetlands are located on the site per the
ZE-27-01
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing
2 of 6
.
~pokane County Critical Areas Maps.
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on February 15, 2002, with a
comment period ending on March 1, 2002.
Noticinq
Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
February 15, 2002.
The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal was January
14, 2002.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Submitted: December 18, 2001
Written Determination of Completeness issued: December 27, 2001
Technical Review Meeting: January 17, 2002
Reviewing Aqencies
Eleven (11) agencies were notified on December 27, 2001, and February 6, 2002. Comments were due on
January 17, 2002, and February 20, 2002.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
Received Received I Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes 1-17-2002 Spokane Regional Yes 1-17-2002
of Engineering; Health District
Transportation
Spokane County Division No Washington State Yes 2-27-2002
of Engineering; Department of
Development Services , Transportation -
(WSDOT)
Spokane County Division Yes 1-4-2002 Spokane County Fire Yes 1-16-2002
of Utilities & Protection District No. 1
2-13-2002
Spokane County No West Valley School No
Stormwater Utility District No. 363
Modern Electric Water No Spokane County Air No
Company Pollution Control
Authority - (SCAPCA)
City of Millwood No
Aqency Comments:
Agency comments received are in the form of recommended conditions of approval.
Public Comments:
Two (2) public letters and a petition with a total of fourteen (14) signatures were received in opposition to the
proposal. The primary issues of concern include but are not limited to: proposed use, access, aesthetics,
public safety, crime and property values. On February 26, 2002 the applicant submitted (2) letters in support
of the proposal.
ZE-27-01
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing
3 of 6
. ,
Description of the Site: . i
The subject site is approximatety 23,807 square feet in size and rectangular in shape. The subject site is
developed with an existing duplex approximately 2,424 square feet in size and attached garage
approximately 638 square feet in size. Nora St. provides access to the site and is currently designated a
county Local Access Street. The subject site is relatively flat and partially fenced.
Backqround:
The subject application was submitted to the Division of Planning on December 18, 2001 and a
Determination of Completeness was issued on December 27, 2001. Notice of Application was issued on
December 27, 2001 with a(14) day public comment period ending on January 10, 2002. A technical review
meeting was held on January 17, 2002.
Staff AnalVsis:
Project Description: The applicant has requested a zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on an existing 28,807 square foot parcel. If approved, the applicant
intends to file a preliminary (2) lot short subdivision to create an additional lot to construct a duplex.
Phase I Development Regulations:
On January 15, 2002 the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Phase I
Development Regulations for Spokane County (Resolution #2-0077). Pursuant to Section I, Transitional
Provisions, Zone Reclassification Applications:
"Within the Urban Growth Area Boundary, any zone reclassification application that does not comply with
this ordinance but is considered counter complete prior to the date of adoption of this ordinance, shall be
allowed to proceed with the reclassification process under the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations
in place at the time the application is made. If approved, the zone reclassification shall be effective for one
(1) year from the date of final approval and building permits must be applied for during this time. At the end
of the one-year period, the zoning shall crossover to the new Zoning Map Designation per the crossover
matrix."
The subject parcel is subject to Section I of the Phase I Development Regulations.
A review of the crossover matrix indicates that the underlying Comprehensive Plan Category for the subject
proposal is Low Density Residential. Pursuant to the crossover matrix, all existing Urban Residential - 3.5
(UR-3.5) zone map designations located within a Low Density Residential category shall retain the existing
zone map designation. The subject parcel is cuITently zoned Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5).
Comprehensive Plan:
The staff analysis provided below evaluates the proposal under the Urban Category of the Comprehensive
Plan, which was in effect prior to the January 15, 2002 adoption of the Phase I Development Regulations.
The project site is located entirely within the Urban category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a"citylike" environment,
which includes various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities and services.
Detailed Definition B states: "Since urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categories, it
is primarily a residential category of single family, two family, multifamily, and condominium buildings along
with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and recreational facilities.° "The more intensive
land uses will be located near the heavily traveled streets, while the least intensive residential uses will be
isolated from the noise and heavy traffic." Low to moderate levels of noise and air pollution are to be
expected due to the intensity of activities and the high volume of traffic generated. " Detailed Definition C
states: "Urban areas will have public water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and
utility systems." Streets will be paved. Public facilities and other services typical of Urban areas may include
police, refuse collection and removal, animal control and street maintenance." Detailed Definition D states:
ZE-27-01
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing
4 of 6
.
"Que to the varieky and mix of land uses and activitites found in the Urban categoty, few land us+e activities
would be mappropriate." Many uses may require screening`or vther standards ta make them campatible
with one another."
The Gtials, C7bjectives ,and Deeision Guidelines identified in Section 1 of the Camprehensive P#an are used
to determine whether a prvposal in the Urbart categary► should be approved, approved with conditions or
derried. A detaited description of the applicable Goals, Ubjectives and DecESivn Guidelrnes is pravided
belouv and an analysis of how the prvposal dQes ar does nvt cvmply wikh these policies.
C?bjective 1.1.a pramotes "fl1-in" withirr established development areas where utilities, arterials, schoals and
cammunity facilities have aiready been established. The subject proposal can be cvnsidered "fiil-in"
develapment. The subject site and surround'+ng prvper#ies are develaped and located in an area where
utilities, arterials, schvols and +community facilities have alceady heen established.
Objective 1.1,b states that higher-density development should be Iocated wEth direct or near direc# access to
the majar arterial systems rather than on in#erior neighbarhoad streets. Access to public transportation
shauld alsa be considered. As proposed, the subject parcel has direct access ta interiar neighbarhaod
s#reets. Access is currenfly obtained from Nora St., and the applicant has obtained a 20' access easement
from Vllvodruff Rd. Ivcated apprvximately 123' east of the of the subjeet site. Access to public transportativn
is available along Missivn St. Iocated approximately 850 feet south of the subjeet site.
Decision Guideline 9.3.1 states: "That praposed Urban develapments should be designed to beneft fram,
aecommvdate and complement the eRVironmental conditians and environmental feafures." Campliance with
agency cvnditions and coun#y standards will assure that develvpment of the subject propasai will benefit
frQm, accvmmodate and eomplement the envirQnmental conditions and enviranmental features applic.abfe #o
the subject site, A review of the Spokane County Gritica[ Areas maps did nv# indicated the presence of any
criticai areas located on-site.
. Decisivn Guideline 1.3.3 states that: "All Urban development prvpQSals should require public sanitary and
stvrm water systems to proteet water quality." Public sewers will be made auailable to senre the subject site.
Stvrmwater cvntainment and filtration cvnsistent with Spokane County Stormwater Management Gu'sdelines
will be required as part of site development.
Objective 1.5.e recommends that when a neighborhvad experiences pressure far achange of character,
such change shall be perrnifted upvn appropriate review. Apprapriate revicew has occurred thraugh the
application pracess. lf appTaved, compliance with agency "Conditivns of Approval" and the Development
Standards of the Urban Residential - 7(UR-7) zane will help to reduce impacts ta residential horraes located
south, east and west of the subject sste. In additivn, to deuelvp #he parcel as prvpvsed the applicant will be
required to apply for and receive approval of a(2) two lot short subdivision.
Goal 'l.fi, Dbjective 1.6,a and Decisivn Guideline 1.6.1 reGOmmend that an orderly pattern of develapment
be established between develaped and undeveloped areas. Utility secvices shvuld be arderly and properly
covrdinated with land use planning. Prior to apprQVal, fand use prapvsais should conform to utility and
transportativn plans and tafte steps tv mitigate impacts on existing ufility and transpar#atiQn systems. The
site will be served by Modern Electric Vlfater Cvmpany and the County+ sewer system. The Spokane County
Division of Utilities, Spokane Regivnal Health Department and Spokane County Division of Engineering and
Rvads have submitteci recommended "Conditivns of Approval" ta ensure consistency wiYh utility and
transportativn plans.
fn summary, the prapasal is generally consisten# with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guideiines of the
Urban category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning!
ZE-27-41
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing
5 of 6
The purpose and intent of the proposed Urban Reside,ntial-7 (UR-7) zone is to set standards for the orderly
development of residential property in a manner that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures
the protection of property values. It is intended that this zone be used to add to the variety of housing types
and densities, up to approximately seven (7) units per acre, and as an implementation tool for the Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan.
Site Plan:
The site plan of record illustrates the subject parcel and the existing development on site, which includes an
existing duplex and attached garage. The site plan of record illustrates the setbacks from the existing duplex
to adjoining property lines, parcel dimensions and the location of the roadway system. The site plan of
record illustrates a 20' access easement that connects with Woodruff Rd approximately 123' east of the
subject site and a proposed lot line for a second lot.
The following is an overview of the site plan data submitted by the applicant and the requirements of the
Zoning Code.
Site Plan Data:
Existinq Duplex Required/Allowed
Building Coverage Not Shown 55% maximum
Building Height 18 feet 35 feet
Building Setbacks
Front yard 30' 25' from property line
Side yard
East 6' S' per story minimum
West 17' 5' per story minimum
Rear yard 172' 15' from property line
Parking None Shown One and one half (1-1/2) spaces per
dwelling unit.
Staff Summary:
As conditioned, the proposed zone reclassification is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives
Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and can implement the purpose and
intent of the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone. Strict conformance with the development standards
of the Urban Residential - 7(UR-7) zone may help to reduce the impacts of the proposed use on adjacent
properties.
Attachments:
A. Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Development Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency Comments
D. Public Comments
ZE-27-01
Staff Report - March 6, 2002 Hearing
6 of 6
. •
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY MAP
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ZONING MAP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ZE-47-01,
Existing Zoning
\117
~
~ d
- 8446 1-2 ~ 65 1ig 25 Bi6
4WIS~ L~nn •onmaru F
-a 41 97cL 1 55 1- 49e c
I - 1
~ -
i I 2~77 55
w
B-3 ! 62 I-2 T~ 55
B-3 22 75 I-21 85 ~
UR-29 5 63 I•Y MeiC
~-2~4 76C 1-2177 55
e-S 2 6 79C U 1•260 74
~{•22 43 d2
~
.
~ U-3.S 8 I-2 222 7tC ~ I 177 55
200 65 ~-2 84 46
~ 18355 1-2177 S5 I-2177 66
B-3 I•2 222A 79C
a
Nt- 06A 70C 55 _ ~
.
~ U '3 v 1
e-2 84 46 I S 76
A R-7 7e »
B. 84 -
2 ~
c 5121 UR 3.5 1 UR-3.6 32
. _ - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ ~
e 96 U- 6' 2 Y, _
63 -
-1 s-a e~
auu
!7 . Q-1
3CA-1 C sOC ' • ~ ~ ' ~
C
d~ 8~ C
6C -S. 2
77
UR .5 ~ S, gz U-3 6 1 .52 I R- .5
• . 8 7
UR 7 8C
Q 1
~ 9 321 - ~ U-8 5 1
B
8 7
-S.S 32155 UR-3.6 164 94 bd 143.0 1
Scale : 1 inch - 667 ft(rvunded) 12/20/01 Exisdng Znning
ZE-2J,-01 ' .
Comprehensirre Land Use Pian
~
~ w
~
L~
I ~
J, ~ - ~ ~CI
I ~ - - ~ ~ !
_LLL i iTT -Lw
~ I .
I i =1 11111- ,
A ~L7
~ 0 y
-J I
I 1
7TTFFT
l~
L_~, LE
- i
I l i
Scale :1 inch - 833 ft (rounded) 12120101 Comprehensiue L.and Use Plan -
Subject Proparty within 1UC314, +u.n ,n " Su6ject Property within UTA.
4 4 4 4 { + 4 4 Subject Property within PSSA. "_A I . Sub'ect Pro
~ pertY w;thin ASA.
, ~s t
AECEIVED
~ SPpKANe CDUNTy
m 1 a 2001
E S ,
DIVtSION Of P1.ANMNG
r! ~
1d 1ey f
r ~
=1d1N .
L6.~d G~~''es
g f s
-
P,, p-rej,4,,~ p,NN
~
, t
~ t ' • 1
au1 '7
~ , . ~
~ "r'`..... `
}~C ~ ~ r ~ ~ • ~
1 ~ ~ ~ • -
~ , L ~e ~ ,T • ~
1 - ~7R• ~ f )J►~) i~~ ~ ~''i
a ~q
. ~
. R sq
r-f
~
t 34 ~
wL
~ ZE-27-01
Vicinity Map
_ . ,
`ver
-
\ -
~
\ `
. . . . . ~ . .
~ -
~
~
e Wna.
~ > Jact
ty~~.,,, M°'a►t°'ncrv
OIII~
~ Knox 08 KIIOz i
I-90 ~
~ ~ -
=z - i
~ ~ -
~ ~ - ~ -
'~lor„
N ~ - ~
~
_ -AvWQ
, . , ~ ~ . ~ ~ Idi~sim,• ~ --t-
~
~ maxwou
, Muwcll V
V wiY
_~jp~• c~. ~j SuMO Sinb ~ . cer..
tL
i-
r~r
n.....
~Deurdg Dt
,amie
cc GWkb _ C~a4M
Gmkki
4 -Lkorr
g ~ tifallar
Arthc4 B N~ess~ E/ementary '
~ 17
l~roa way
v v.uevwmy -
~
r+ixo, ` NIrM1 6
okane t Hfg&-k ~
>
~a.in
Scale :1 inch -1250 ft (roundec) 02h4/02 Vanity Map
.
i
ATTACHMENT B
CONDIiIONS OF APPROVAL
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
1 ~ APPROVAL FOR ZE-27-01
1~
~ ~ oh, DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOK;IST COUKIY
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies only to the parcel legally described in the Planning Division
project application file designated ZE-27-01, Assessor's Tax Parcel #45083.0497.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential - 7(UR-7) zone, and all other
applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
4. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public
notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as (insert legal description) is the subject of a
land use action decided upon by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on (insert date
of final approval) imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No.
ZE-27-01 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of
Planning.
5. Pursuant to Section I of the Phase I Development Regulations (Resolution #2-0077)
adopted January 15, 2002, the zone reclassification shall be effective for one year from
(insert date of final approval). Building Permits shall be applied for during this time. If a
building permit is not applied for by the end of the one year time period, the zoning shall
crossover to the new Zoning Map Designation per the crossover matrix, i.e. Urban
Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5).
6. Subdivision of the subject property will require compliance with the Spokane County
Subdivision Ordinance.
ZE-27-01 - March 6, 2002 Public Hearing
Division of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
~ ► 1
"
SPOKANE NTY
JAN 0 4 2052
To Jason Langbehn (Division of Pianning)
CC DMSlO1V OF PLIQiVNING
From Jim Red (Division of Utiiities)
Date Friday January 04 2002
SubJect ZE-0027 01 Stage Technical Review Phase
Nora Ave and I-90 UR-3 5 to UR-7
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shaii submit histoncal and or
estrmated water usage pnor to the issuance of the connection permit m order to establish
sewer fees
SS12/a1 Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Divisron of Ublities under separate cover"
only those plan sheets showing sewer pians and specrfications for the public sewer
connections and faalities for review and approval Commerciai developments shall submit
historicai and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittat
SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit
SS15/4 Arrangements for payment of app(icable sewer charges must be made pnor to rssuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial dependmg upon the nature of the development
VVSO'i Any water service for this proJect shail be provided in accordance with the Coordmated Water
System Plan for Spokane County as amended
01/18/09 WED 11 59 FAg 508 889 4125 SPOBANE VALLEY FIRE DEPT ~4-* PLANNING 10002
1 ~
SPOKANE Vt~~~~~ ~~~~~TMENT
~ Spokone County Flre Dlsfrlct 1
10319 EAST SPRACUE AVE SPOKANE WA 99206 3676 (509) 928 1100 FAx (506) 892 41 a5
January 16, 2002
Jason Langbehn
Department of Building and Planning
10261n! Broadway
Spokane, Wi4 99260
RE Zone Reclassifcation
ZE-27-01
Dear Mr Langbehn
The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objection to this zone reclassffication The
existing fire hydrants and access are adequate
SIPICePeIy,
C-4
Kevin Miller
Deputy Fire 9Vlarshal
KiVI/dc
A IDepertment DatalProvention UnshaPedlPl0te15hartiesVasgn Lergbohn 1 16-02 doc
ui/ib/ot wr.D ii si raX soe 4e2 aizs sPORANE vALLEY FIRE DEPT 4-+4 PLANNING [iE ooi
~~~LEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
E. 10319 SPRAGU~ AVENUE
SPOKANE, WA 99206
(509) 928s1700 Phone
(809) ~5 FAX
FACSO~ILE COVER SHEET
TOo §&V 69W4-8m~ ~ATE
_ FAX NO
(Company)
FROb~ ~k-wK.. ' N0. OF PAGES ~
(Inciuding cover sheet)
COMMENTS
CONFflD~NTIALOTY _CAUTOON
This message Is intenaed only for the use of the Individual or entity to
wh~ch at Is addressec9 and contains information that es privileged and
conf dentra9 If the Peader of this message us not the Intended
recapeent or the employee or agent responsible for deeieer,ng the
message to the intended recapfent, you are hereby notafied that any
dissemonation, destr0aut6on or copyang of tn0s communocat,on os
stroctCy pPohabrted 6f you have received thls communrcataon on error,
poease notify us 6mmediately by telephone and return the original to
us at the above address at our cost
/ai
revised a 9f24/99
0 1Department DaealAdmini*attcnlFormslFAXCOVER DOC
1
Page 3 Enqineers ~
8eariag / Review / 01/17/2002 TR
2E-0027-01
without any monetary participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of
execution below This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
10 "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adJustments or relocation regarding
these utilities '"The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work "
END
a
~
Paqe 2 Enqineers
Hearing / Review / 01/17/2002 TR
ZE-0027-01
installation of 30 feet of asphalt Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Ntanagement in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
9 Appiicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the
following
The owner(s) or successor(s) en interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property
m a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement
District for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below by requesting and authorizing Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District
pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requesting and authonzing Spokane County to cast their
ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030,
and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RI D are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RI D
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID
by edher the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the
Supenor Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final
assessment roll, provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair
value improvement(s) add(s) to the property
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road
Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at
the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RI D or served by the improvements
OFFICE OF THE SPOKA(VE COUNTY ENGIIVEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, VVA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
m k
~CcxMVT "ENGINEER'S CONDITeONS OF ~~~~OVAL" TR ZONE
- - - - - ; - . _ - - . - -
TO Spokane County Division of Planning ~
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE January 17, 2002
PFtOJECT URm3 5 TO URm7 DUPLEXES
FILE # ZE-0027-01 RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
Technical/Review Date (01117/2002 @ 2 15)
Pianner JASON LANGBEHN JAN 17 2
Hearing Date @ DIViSiON OF PLANIVIIdG
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant ALVIN A SEVERSON
Section Township Range 08-25-44
The Spokane County Division of Engineenng and Roads has reviewed the above referenced
application The foliowing °'Conddions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of
Planntng for inclusion in the °'Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be
approved
Praor to release of a builcleng perrnut or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer
2 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engeneer The design location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance vvith standard engineering practices
3 To constr-uct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of
the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which
purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) for said improvement pursuant to
RC1IV 36 88, as amended Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these
improvements This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
4 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated
herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required
improvement Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements This
provisoon is applicable to Woodruff Road
5 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Woodruff Road which provides direct access to the proposed development This will require the
CC Applicant ALVIN A SEVERSON
Engineer/Surveyor CHARLES E SIMPSON
Planner JASON LANGBEHN
~
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS
a Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
b Water service shall be coorduiated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
d A public sewer system vvill be made ava.ilable for the project
e Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolubited
4
i ~
il ECBNICA.~ REVAE♦Y 1V'H1C~~TING
SPOKANE COUN'I`Y I)MSION OF BiJIL,DIVG ANH) PL,ANNgNG
Date Januarv 17, 2002
Department Spokane Regional Health District
Dr /
Department Contact Person Steven P Holderby, R S
Action ZE-27-01, Zone reclassification from Urban Residential - 3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban
Residential - 7(UR-7) on an existing parcel approximately 23,807 square feet in size for those
uses allowed in the Urban Residenhal - 7(UR-7) zone If approved, the applicant intends to
apply for a preluYUnary (2) lot short plat to a11ow the construction of a duplex
TECUNICAL REVIEW MEETING January 17, 2002 @ 2 15 p m
,
Note
The followmg information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist
the sponsor and aid the processmg of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner The
following information does not provide a complete or bmding final review of the proposal 'I'his will
occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearmg Agenda The acceptance of
the apulication and scheduling of the applicahon on the Public Hearing Agenda is the pnrnary function
of this meetmg A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the
gpplication This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as
standard development conditions and design recommendations
'I'he comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the
Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the mformation (not all agencies/departments
have been contacted-only those who have been determined to have primary mterest )
1 a Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be place on the Public
Hearing Agenda? Z YES ❑ NO
b If no what is tacking?
c I'ublic Hearing Schedule Heanngs before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon
determination that the application is complete Items will be scheduled for the first available
pubtic hearing
2 After a preliminarv review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of
the development9 (Attach conditions if necessary)
See attached condrtions
i )
SPOKANE cou~r~r
13 202
DivIsioti oF PLANNiNG
To Jason Langbehn (Division of Planning)
CC
From Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date Wednesday February 13 2002
Subject ZE-0027-01 Stage Hearing Examiner Phase
Nora Ave and I-90 UR-3 5 to UR-7
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish
sewer fees
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities under separate cover'
only those plan sheets showmg sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shail submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal
SS'i 2F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shail be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit
SS15A Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
UVS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County as amended
i ~
Langbehn, JaSOn
, _ - - - -
- ~
From Figg Greg [FiggG@WSDOT WA GOV]
Sent Wednesday February 27 2002 8 20 AM
To Langbehn Jason
Cc Cote Ron Kay Charlene
Subject RE Alvm Severson Rezone
Jason, this is what I found out about your e-mail below WSDOT has made Mr
Severson an offer to purchase 5' strip of property along his I-90 frontage
as well as a 5' temporary construction easement On the property we are
purchasing we will be constructing a 8'-10' high noise wall (the 5'
temporary easement allows us onto his property for this construction) in
con3unction with our I-90 widening pro3ect from Argonne Road to Sullivan
Road Our real estate services section also tells me that we are acquiring
for Mr Severson a 20' easement ad3acent to our I-90 right of way to allow
this proposed duplex to access Woodruff Road
We do ask that this 5' property acquisition be taken into account when
building setbacks and lot dimensions are considered
Thanks again for the e-mail on this one
Greg Figg
WSDOT
-----Original Message-----
From Langbehn, Jason [mailto JLangbehn@spokanecounty org]
Sent Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10 33 AM
To 'FiggG@WSDOT WA GOV'
Sub3ect
Greg,
I had a question for you File ZE-27-01, a preliminary zone
reclassification,
was sent to your office for review on February 6, 2002 The applicant is
attempting to obtain a zone (UR-7) that would allow another duplex to be
constructed on a second lot (provided he obtains approval on a preliminary
(2)
lot short plat) Recently he obtained a 20' access easement along the
northern
boundary of the parcel to the east and along I-90 right-of-way My question
involves what a number of public comments identify as an existing 15 foot
easement that serves a number of lots along I-90 right-of-way and the future
construction of a sound barrier wall Can you provide any insite?
Thanks, Jason
S~ ~
~E"u 2 7 2092
DMSf~~ PLANNINQ
1
ATTACHMENT D
LETTERS RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC
,
SPOKANEICOUNTY
FEB 2 6 2002
DIVISION OF PLANNING
February 21, 2002
Jason Langbehn
Associate Planner
1026 VV Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
To whom rt may concern,
I am wntmg this letter to comment on the proposed zone change I have been a residence
at 9817 E Nora for two years
After retmng I moved to Spokane because of the caliber of life since I enjoy hunting and
fishulg in the area
In the past I have owned my home and uitend to build in the near future I have enjoyed
hving in this neighborhood, due to the qwet area and accessibilrty to I-90 Spokane has everything
I need along this comdor
Having read the proposal I don't understand how another duplex could effect tlus
neighborhood From the tune I have hved here A1 has only rented to quahty professional tenants
I don't know of any complalnt in tlus neighborhood about this existing duplex I know that
this property Ls kept and maintauied as well if not better then other homes on this block Havulg a
duplex in a residential neighborhood has met my needs
Beuig fiundar vvith the proposed parcel, I have never noticed any misconduct at that
location wluch Ls duectly behuid my backyard I have even felt comfortable enough to store some
valuables on the proposed srte
Sulcereiy,
Ron Demarcus
i
RECEIVED
January 6, 2002 3POK4iVE COUN°I`V
JAN 8 2002
Jason Langbehn, Associate Planner DIV'5~~~ PLANN'NG
Spokane County Divlsion of Planiung
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Waslvngton 99260-0050
RE Project File Number(s) ZE-27-01
Tax Parcel #(s) 45083 0497
Owner/Applicant Alvm Severson
12807 S Starr Rd
Rockford, WA 99030
(509) 291-4070
I)ear 1VIr Langbehn,
We, the undersigned property owners, jointlympose the proposed project ZE-29-01 We, as
property owners and residence located within the affected area of the subject property, wish to
formally submrt our objections to this project We ask that you strongly take mto consideration
merely a few of our objections as noted
1 The proposed zone change, reclassificatron from Urban Residentral - 3 5 (UR-3 S) to
Urban Restdential -7 (UR-7) on an extshng parcel approxtmately 23,807 square feet in
size for those uses allowed in the Urban Resrdenhal -7(UR-7) zone would allow for the
building of another lugh density multi-family dwelling The addrtion of a second duplex
on this parcel will increase the "per farnily densrty" per square foot, adduig to the
degeneration of a neighborhood that was designed for low-density usage, one or two
households per lot
2 Road access there is no road access to this srte There is no current surfaced street that
would allow for adequate traffic flow There ts only limlted on street pazking available
for current homeowners and residents The addition of a new multi-fanuly dwelling
would further hmrt our on street parking Please note that the current rear access
easement is a single lane, dut path, not a surfaced road In addrtion, when the proposed
sound barrier wall is built, there will be further narrowing of the easement
3 Probability of lower property value is of great concern. Wrthui the past six months there
have been two "meth lab busts" wrthui one block of the proposed location. These
dwellings were both occupied by renters
4 Spokane County has a number of rentals avaflable for those m need of temporary
housmg We homeowners bought our homes in this area to occupy as one or two family
units It would further degrade the neighborhood to allow for the proposed zorung
a
1
~ e
Fage 3 Project File Number(s) ZE-27-01
s 1780 3 /Yova- ? ? 24. 1 q'
Pnnt
C' - ~ •
Signature
6 05 F d&61,.- JD1pZ/ 6 51'
e eS ~c Boyd °
~
PnnY
- ~ .
~i ,
Signature
~ 4J ~ e Zr< <l6 17 E. I~o ~~4 r~ 8-~ t q S
~
Pnnt
Signature
° F J
s ~6~
~
~ ~
Pnnt ,
. ~
ig
~ 8~ ~ ~ Gc~ad c~~
9 al M U JM ~ a o
nnt
~
1gYla
L
,o r e. 9,4~
.
Pnnt U
~ (3p
lg e ~
0 '
Page 5 Project File Number(s) ZE-27-01
17
'i Pruit
Signature
18 _
Pnnt
Signahue
19
Pnnt
Signature
20
Pruit
Signature
~ RECEIVED ~
SPOK4NE CCJUNTY
To Jason Langbehn e A!V 4 2002 January 2 2002
From Ron and Donna Tweedy pIyIsIpN OF PLANNINC
East 9803 Nora
Spokane, Washulgton 99206
Subject Zorung change, Refural # ZE-27-01
This letter is written with the intent to give our views to the proposed zoning change of the parcel of
property to the east of our property lme from a UR 3 5 to a 7-UR
All the foregomg will be reasons why this change should not be allowed
The addrtion of another Duplex on this parcel will bnng futher stagnation to this neiborhood that was
designed for suigle family dwellmgs
There is no road to this site only an easement and this is not much more than a goat trail that was a
mud bog when I moved here and I spent $500 00 to make it as good as it is which isn t saywg much
The easement will become smaller as the DOT is taking 4-5 feet for a sound bamer wall and my deed
shows that the easement is only 15 feet wide This easement is used by my self and four other home
owners to the west of our property How would you account for the added traffic as to passmg one
another and the cloggmg that could occur m the event of the need for pohce emergency or fire
fighting equipment? There was a fire along the freeway fence and at that time the larger fire trucks
could not pull m there or wouWt This took place this last year on about the first of August
Duplexes can bi-ulg a transiet element of people This location would be secluded by fences on all four
sides and would not be visable to patrolling poLce services In the last 5 6 months two meth houses have
been busted wnthm one block of the proposed locadon one just this tast December Two years ago a
house m the the N 1800 block of Woodruffwas busted for drugs this house bemg wrthin 200 feet of the
proposed location This was a rental as were the other two The house that sits on the conner of Nora
and Woodruffwhich ajoins the proposed site was the subject of mtense police attention for along
tune until] its problems got busted up It was a rental And still is
As the entrance to this locahqn is not a county road there would be np curbmg lightmg or snow plowing
services unless the county made it a road and then are people beyond the renters gowg to park as they
please? I have a motor home that I go through there with as I park it m the back yard at hmes and do repavs
to it
m our shop back there Am I gomg to be restncted m gemng it in and out of there? In the past I have
chased off a number of people who thought they were going to dump garbage back there and have gotten
up m the mornmg to find brodies have toren up my back yarti or that items were
stolen off of vehicles parked out there We don t need any more traffic out there m the dark
I have a 30 by 60 shop t6at sits on the NE corner of our lot that I have to constady watch over as far as it
bemg broken mto Bnngmg in more traffic will only make rt worse to patrol And whats to stop those
living 15 20 feet of my shop and having an open accsess through the easement to not always be
incroching on our ruadway and yard and littermg or doing as they please out there Afterall I cant
watch this area 24 hours a day
We bought mto what was a mce neiborhood that is now turnmg mto a rental area that is devalutng our ~ ~
property just so some one can make a buck off of rentals There is no need for another clapboatd two
door swmg motel on this property It's as if we don t have any say m the matter It s a given that the
more people you squeese into a nule the more cnme your gotng to have We don t need aay more
cars, people polution and noise The exishng duplex on said site has had no less than 10 different
renters mits short existance 2 3 years and one goup left dead cars that had to be eventually towed
off Rather than makmg a decison from one side of the desk would rt not be prudent to see it from
the field side by sendmg out a hands on investigator You tell me Do I need to hire a lawyer I feel I will
be the only one you wil l be hearmg from on ttus matter as I am the most affected and that some
of the close by and bordenng placeses don t care as they are renters and that I have the most to lose ~
Rop~ld L Twee y
~
Donna F Tweedy
~ • ~ ;
<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e 3 ~
~
4
r
1
S P O K A N E O U N T Y
~uA DNiSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DE"
DIVISION OF PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane eaftilliadvion.of Enginee r~~
Kimbat +
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Fony
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA)
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Modern Electric Water Company
West Valley School District No. 363
City of Millwood
Washington State Department of Transportation; Greg Figg
FROM: Jason Langbehn, Associate Planner
DATE: February 6, 2002
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing on March 6, 2002 @ 10:30 am.
FILE NO: ZE-27-01
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on an existing parcel approximately
23,807 square feet in size for those used allowed in the Urban Residential-7
(UR-7) zone. If approved, the applicant intends to apply for a preliminary (2)
lot short plat to allow the construction of a duplex.
PARCEL NO: 45083.0497
APPLICANT: Alvin Severson, 12807 S. Starr Rd., Rockford, WA 99030
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by February 20, 2002.
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W. BROADWAY 0 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133
,
NOTICE OF PUBI.IC HEARING
SPOKAlTE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
T'O All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY N0TIFIED THAT A PUBLgC HEARING WII.L BE HELD ON THE
I.AND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOVVS
Apphcatflon ZE-27-01, Zone reclassification from Urba.n Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5) to Urban
Residential-7 (UR-7) on an existing parcel approximately 23,807 square feet in size for those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone If approved, the applicant mtends to apply for a
prelinunary (2) lot short plat to allow the conshuction of a duplex
Parcel lvo 45083 0497
Hearnng Date and Time March 6, 2002 @ 10 30 am
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Waslungton
Owner/Apphcant Alvul Severson, 12807 S Starr Rd, Rockford, WA 99030
Address and lLocatioan Generally located south of and adjacent to Interstate-90 (I-90) and north of and
adjacent to Nora Ave in the SW '/4 of Section 8, Townslup 25 N, Range 44 EWM The srte addresses are
9817 & 9819 E Nora Ave
Comprehenswe Plan Urban
Ezgstmg Zoming Urban Residenhal-3 5(UR-3 5)
Environffiental I)eterminataon A Determination of Nonsigmficance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Platuung, as the lead agency on Februaty 15, 2002 The comment penod ends March 4,
2002
Related Perffints In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional pemuts must be
obtained as required by other local, state and federal agencies
Davasgoffi of Pflannflng Stafff Jason Langbehn, Associate Planner (509) 477-7196
HEARING E lt PItOCEDURES
Heanng Process and Appeals The heanng will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public heanng, and
may submrt written comments and documents before or at the hearing The Heanng Examiner may lnut
the tune given to speakers A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
the Heanng Examtner's decision will be based on the record established before the Heanng Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Envuonmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlymg action All hearmgs will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons
vath physical disabilrties
Inspeclhon off Fde, Copies of I➢ocuments A Staff Report will generally be avallable for uispection
seven days before the heanng The Staff Report and applicanon file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Planrung, V Floor Pernut Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m, weekdays,lVl-F, except holidays Copies
of documents will be made ava.ilable for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200 Send wntten comments to the Spokane County
Division of Planrung, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn Jason Langbehn Motions must
be made in wntmg and subnutted to the Spokane County Hearuig Exanuner, 3' Floor, Public Works
Building, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245
~
Kimball, Sandy
From Nyberg Gary
Sent Friday December 28 2001 11 45 AM
To Baldwin Greg
Cc Hohman John Kimball Sandy
Subject ZE 27 01
The subject property is located within the Spokane Valley which is pre approved for conventional drainage systems No
concept drainage plan is required and the zone change submittal is technicaliy complete regarding stormwater Please
Standard
include the following standard condition in the staff report Condrtion doc
, '41a
~
,iC v Q
Cdl~ 5 ~e~NS
1")C ~ Jc
~
~
~
,
~ ~n e co
~e C rk v s ~
.
edeN
c f~ ~ z,
1
ti} STANDAAfCONDITION OF %PROVAL
FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. ZE-27-01
Prepared By Gary Nyberg, Dev Srvcs
Date 12/28/01
1 A Professional Engineer(P E) licensed in the State of Washington shall submit road and
storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of
the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelmes for
Stormwater Management, and all applicable federai state and local regulations and laws
that are in effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit
application(s) The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive
the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of any Grading Building or Right-of-
Way Permit
PAGE 1 ' ► 14 : 2 4: 4 9 15 JAN 2002
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05441 WOODRUFF CT (START) .000 WOODRUFF RD U 19 PAVED 40
WOODRUFF CT (END) .030 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
05326 WOODRUFF RD (START) .000 HOLMAN RD U 19 PAVED 33
WOODRUFF RD .OSO 48TH AV (START) U 19 PAVED 33
.170 46TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 33
.310 44TH AV U 19 PAVED 36
.440 SUNDERLAND DR (START U 19 PAVED 36
.550 DRIFTWOOD DR U 19 PAVED 36
.680 CIMMARON DR U 19 PAVED 40
.840 WOODRUFF CT (START) U 19 PAVED 40
.890 39TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
WOODRUFF RD (END) 1.070 36TH AV (START) U 19 PAVED 40
05327 WOODRUFF RD (START) .000 16TH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
WOODRUFF RD .060 15TH AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.090 ROBINHOOD ST (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.130 14TH AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.200 13TH AV (STAR.T) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.300 11TH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.360 lOTH AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.430 9TH AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
.500 8TH AV U 19 PAVED 30
WOODRUFF RD (END) .620 6TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30
05328 WOODRUFF RD (START) .000 BROADWAY AV U 19 PAVED 20
WOODRUFF RD .240 BOONE AV U 19 PAVED 20
.360 SINTO AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
.490 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 20
.650 NORA AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
.670 NORA AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
WOODRUFF RD (END) .720 BALDWIN AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
05329 WOODRUFF RD (START) .000 SOUTH END TO SHANNON U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
WOODRUFF RD .010 KNOX AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
.060 SHANNON AV (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
.250 MONTGOMERY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.350 JACKSON AV (START) U 19 PAVED 30
WOODRUFF RD (END) .420 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
5 Records Processed
.
~ s ~
~ - )C-0ject
~
'
/ k ~
~ss, h z y /
jf bt,,- c . ~
~
P(ltc k
PAGE 1 1 ,1 . 14:27:09 31 DEC 2001
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
03320 NOR.A AV (START) .000 WEST END TO PARK RD U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV .210 PARK RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
.280 EDGERTON RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
.360 CENTER RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
.490 ELLA RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
NORA AV (END) .690 VISTA RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
03321 NORA AV (START) .000 VISTA RD U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV .060 SIPPLE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
.120 BESSIE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
.180 LAURA RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV (END) .250 SARGENT RD U 19 PAVED 40
03348 NOR.A AV (START) .000 WOODRUFF RD U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV .060 WALNUT RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
.120 HERALD RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV (END) .170 DARTMOUTH RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
03357 NORA AV (START) .000 FELTS RD U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV .060 BALFOUR. RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 40
NOR.A AV ( END ) .120 RAYMOND RD U 19 PAVED 40
03383 NORA AV (START) .000 WEST END TO GLENBROO R 09 PAVED 36
NORA AV .020 GLENBROOK RD R 09 PAVED 36
NORA AV (END) .120 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
0 3 3 2 2 NORA AV ( STAR.T ) .000 LOCUST RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40
NORA AV (END) .240 WOODRUFF RD U 19 PAVED 40
03323 NORA AV (START) .000 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 30
NORA AV ( END ) .900 MAMER RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 22
0 3 3 7 2 NOR.A AV ( S TART ) .000 W I LBUR. RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 32
NORA AV (END) .060 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
03384 NOR.A AV (START) .000 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 36
NORA AV ( END ) .120 GLENN CT ( S TART ) U 19 PAVED 36
9 Records Processed
i DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: ZE-27-01
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on approximately 23,807 square feet for those uses allowed in the Urban
Residential-7 (LJR-7) zone.
PARCEL NO.: 45083.0497
HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 6, 2002 @ 10:30 am.
APPLICANT: Alvin Severson, 12807 S Starr Rd. Rockford, WA 99030 509/291-4070
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located south of and adjacent to Interstate-90 (I-90) and
north of and adjacent to Nora Ave. in the SW of Section 8, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later
t6an 5:00 p.m., March 1, 2002, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments s6ould be sent
to t6e contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Jason Langbehn, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 (509) 477-7196
DATE ISSUED: February 15, 2002 SIGNATURE: /1006W w
0ONEMETI'S RTGARDING IIWIRONMIINrfAL OONC.EtNS ARE WELJCOME AT THE HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERNIINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOK:ANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
7. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authoriry; Chuck Studer
9. Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rohwer
10. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
11. Modern Electric Water Company
12. West Valley School District #363
13. Spokane Historic Preservation Office
14. City of Millwood
Jan 15 02 03 37p P 1
~
~ UrrILITY EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this Ly '"'day of .,~r 2001
by the undersigne3 property owner, who is granting the easement across their property
WHEREAS tlus easement was created as a medium of ingress and egress i'or the benefi t ot the
following descnbed property located wi~ n Secti n(s) 9 Townshlp 2S Range
EWM Snokane County Washington , ~L e r~ lU.ber, y5 OY~ O~/q 7
The Weet 80 00 feet of Lot 1 in HlocDk i oP WoODBA
Plat tA3z~d raurd&ti in vol►awd 2 of Pla;f~, Page 34
HXCBPT the North 98 00 feet, ~ ~
~I
AND TOGBTHER WIZgI the Nor$h 98 0o feet of Lot 1, E
iZ 3 feet tRereot _ fJ~ ~
U
~►PdD INCLUDIAIG that portion of Block a9e o! OPPOIiTO~dg thereoi recorded in voluns eK91 oP Platc, P&qe 201 11 C
cf Primagy State Highway Alo, Z anc9 Easterly of the We,
enid Lot I extenaed Nogtherly to said bignweyt
EXCEPT the East 123 feet thereofp
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington
AC,CESS to the above descnbed tract of land along with a utility easement rs provided by an
access and egress easement berng C) feet wide and descnbed as follows
gw('\ nc~ , r c.~. ELJast 3 i.zcti on Aerojs 4A Cur+ h 'AOieef c~
N,A.r+?)ON r qy-003. 01-107
ZWI' 123 MM ~ PAW 091 ZZM 296a O ITZo & Y00 TO PLAT
vow= -R°' oF Fumg PAM 10B &TIM Gomm OF pmmav
NO 2 AM NAR= O~ ~~CMa~ ~20 MIM~ 8in VOLUM 2,~~ F
P~80 I~AGO 35s ICc~ ~3~M98 COUMMo •~r1 D~7n ~ J031~i l.t~ODO{~"'Ll.
La~rce 9 a. T r''l c- Ga-.,- ve y~ Go,^~ -,e~e 6ra.nts +h 1 sEa.56 m e L-►-r
-t-d Xvln flSet/erso•1 HIS AP l~~j r5~ /~ss ~ r~~Icoreue y°
, as shown on attached NiAP
MAINTENANCE of the property covered by this easement sha11 be by the owner(s) of the
properiy served as descnbed above Spokane County has no responsibility to mauitain or
otherwise service the pnvate ingress and egress roadway/easement herein descnbed
I azn the owner of record of the property involved with granting this easement
~ nt nnme)
Owner of Record ~
~
Signed
STATE OF WASHINGTO ) SS
County of Spokane )
I cerhfy that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ---j llj11G~
is the person who the person who appeared before me, and said person ackn
b) free and
(he/she) signed this instrument and aAoit
a ~ y
voluntary act for the use and purposent Dated ~ C
% 25L ~
1VIy Appointmen
exPues -j'c 4
Title
tt f~rcNac Tix E,tie-nPt
I er P/
a
SP( . in ou~~~ ~ /n ,
Jan 15 02 03 31p P 1
46660 10
1 t 1291412001 o 02 10P
~I c~11[nenu rA~ Qn nn ^
l Z~ 0 -7 s~ Stv~~r l~1 .
ko~~--FprCj 14.)&
~
qqo3o
~
~
w
PRIvATE RoAD & UTILa~~ EAsEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 1,4-/4'day of ~r ,200 1
by the under.igned property ourner, who is granhnB the easement across their property
WHEREAS this easement was created as a medium of ingress and egress for the benefit of the
follownng descnbed property located within Sectt n(s) ~p Township,2S Range
EWM Snokane County Waslungton e r7~ J1t w~I.1~e~^ y~ Oe; 041q7
T h e we e t 80 00 Y e e t o f Y, o t 1 in B loc k 1 af wOOD$,p gEIOg*s8 aB per
P18t tr3remf ser,~~ dsd in t1ol4ne 2 of Plat~. pdge 35
$XCBPT the PDortA 98 00 Peet
AND T~ETHER wIZN the North 98 00 feet of Lot 1 EXCEpT tbe EaBt
aas reet taereof
AA1D INCLY7DYldG that pogtion of Block 298 of OPPORTONg?Y es per plat
thereof recorded in valume 'rKe' cf plats, Paqe ao, 3ying Southerly
c! Primas°y Stete Niqhway AIo Z ana Eaeterly of the WeBger2y line of
ea id Ijot 2 extereded Nvathexly t,o se id Highwey t
EXeEPT the Eest~ 123 feet thereog;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington
AC.CESS to the above descnbed tract of land along with a utility easement is proti ided by an
access and egress easement being v feet wide and descnbed as follows
r`c~ ~L1~t , ~,J_st 3i/ ~cfion l~Cro ~S 4Iti,~ IJorf h i.Oiett o f
{>ro~ ~ ~ 1V y5 ~ 03.. Dy0 ~
~ ~ PA= oW 2MMM 2900 ~ IWW. ACOMMIOD mulm
R2~~~ ~ walms "Mm O&~ PUMB PAM 20o LYE= soon O~ ~ amm adIoom4
2 AND mOn= OF wooma m8gom8 A 8L~! " PLM no8~ VOIAM 2 OF
PIAWat lACs 35a 888 GPORADW COUMZTO aIfdlO K7n OC$ /~J7~ ~r l.t~OD~~ILI t
T Mc Gra.K-fs -f-h I s~~.~.n
-f'c? f9Lvln flSeUer.So•~~ HIs A gGi~F''S~ Ass
as shown on attached MAP
MAINTENANCE of the property covered by this easement shall be by the owner(s) of the
property served as descnbed above Spokane County has no responsibility to maintaln or
otherwise service the pnvate ingress and egress roadway/easement herein descnbed
I am the owner of record of the property involved with granting tlus easement
Owner of Record ~!~E~ (Prrnt nnmeJ
Signed
STATE OF WASHINGTO ) SS
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ,x:7 010-
is the Derson who the nerson whc, ar„ParPA1,PfnrP mP -inri cn r~ +~Arcnn -L 'IES ..4
t
OFFICE OF THE SPOKAIVE COUNTY EIVGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~ - - - - - - - - - - - -
Swl,~ Ckul'i" "ENGIIVEER'S CONDITIOiVS OF APPROVAL" TR ZOiVE
TO Spokane County Division of Planning ~
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE January 17, 2002
PROJECT lJR-3 5TO UR-7 DUPLEXES
FILE # ZE-0027-01
Tech n ical/Review Date (01/17/2002 @ 2 15)
Planner JASON LANGBEHN
Hearing Date @
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant ALVIN A SEVERSON
Section Township Range 08-25-44
The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced
application The foilowing "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of
Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be
approved
Prior to release of a builc9eng permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer
2 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalis shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices
3 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may with the approval of
the County Engineer Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which
purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to
RCW 36 88 as amended Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these
improvements This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
4 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant
may with the approval of the County Engineer accomplish the road improvements stated
herein by joining and partiapating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required
improvement Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements This
provision is applicabie to Woodruff Road
5 The County Engineer has designated a Locai Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Woodruff Road which provides direct access to the proposed development This will require the
CC Applicant ALVIN A SEVERSON
Engineer/Surveyor CHARLES E SIMPSON
Planner JASON LANGBEHN
Page 2 gngineers
Hearsng / Review / 01/17/2002 TR
ZE-0027-01
installation of 30 feet of asphalt Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
9 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the
following
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property
in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement
District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District
pursuant to RCW 36 88 050 or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their
ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030,
and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below said owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID
by the property included therein together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed, provided themselves their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID
by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the
Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final
assessment roll, provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair
value improvement(s) add(s) to the property
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road
Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at
the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
Page 3 .Engineers
Hearsng / Review / 01/17/2002 TR
ZE-d-027-01
without any monetary participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of
execution below This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road
10 The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
END
1
1
S P O K A. N E C O iT N"I' Y
DMSION OF PLANNING A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MICHAEL V NEEDHAM DIRECTOR
MEMoRANDUM
TO Spokane County Diwsion of Engineering and Roads Scott Engelhard
Spokane County Development Engineering Services John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District Steve Holderby
Spokane County Fire Protection District No 1
Spokane County Division of Buiiding & Code Enforcement Jeff Forry
IVlodern Electric Water Company
Washington State Department of Transportation
Spokane Histonc Preservation Office
West Valley School District #363
City of Millwood
Spokane Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA)
FROM Jason Langbehn Associate Planner
DAl'E January 17 2002
RE ZE-27-01 Zone reclassification from Urban Residential - 3 5(UR 3 5) to Urban
Residential - 7(UR-7) on an existing parcel approximately 23,807 square feet in size for
those uses allowed in the Urbarl Residential - 7(UR-7) zone If approved, the
applicant tntends to apply for a prelimmary (2) lot short plat to allow the construchon of
a duplex
TECHIVICAL REVIEIld i1AEETONG
Januaoy 17, 2002 0- 2 15 p m
PvBLIC V!lORKS BUILDING CONFERENCE ROONI 1A
Piease review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM for
your comments The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting The sponsor
and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting If you cannot attend the
meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me
prior to the meeting The attached TECHNICAL REVIEw FoRnns will be given to the sponsor at the
meeting and included in the Division of Planning file for this proposal Thank you for your
cooperation If you have any questions about the application please contact me at 477-7196
Attachments Technical Review Form Application Site Plan Vicinity Map
copy w/o attachments to
AI Severson 12807 S Starr Rd Rockford WA 99030
1026 W BROADWAY o SPOKANE WASHINCTON 99260 0220
PHONE (509) 477 7200 o FAX (509) 477 2243 o TDD (509) 477 7133
t
Spokane Coun$y
Devisaon of PBannong
Technecal Review Meeting
Meetang Date and Tame January 17, 2002 a,7 2 15 p m
ProJect FtOe No ZE-27-01
Pa°mject Location The sMte is generally located north of and adjacent to
hlora Ave and south af and adjacent to Interstate-90
(I-90) in the SE % of Section 08, Township 25 N,
Range 44 E VV M
Compa~ehensode Plan Urban (U)
Zone Urban Residential - 3 5(11R-3 5)
Projec$ Descroption Zone reclassification from Urban Residentaal - 3 5
(UFt-3 5) to Urban Residential - 7(UR-7) on an
existing parcel approximately 23,807 square fee$ in
size for those uses allowed in the Urban Ftesidential -
7(UR-7) zone If approved, the applicant intends to
apply for a preliminary (2) lot short plat to allow the
construction of a duplex
Parcel No(s) 45(J83 0497
Appaacant(s) AI Severson
12807 S Starr Rd
Rockford WA 99030
{509} 291-4070
Project PGanner Jason Langbehn, Assoceate Planner
2 r
f~ -
, I
SPOKANE COU~~ ~IM11,10i;~0110
D9VeSeON OF PLANIV9NG SP4KQ►idE COUN'1Y
- ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPUCATION DCC 1 a 2001
PART I DIVIgION OF PI.AtVNItVG
Mamma
'
Applicant __,,Y4
~
11Aailmg Address
Cdy )0,r-k4,r-r
State ~ Zip Code ~
Phone 1/,,9--7& (Work) (Home) Fax
1~1
, ,
Legal Owner t.) ;2~
11~admg Address l q
City State Zip Code
Phone (Work) (Home) Fax
Agent, if different from applicant ~
Mailmg Address
City State Zip Code
Phone (Work) (Home) Fax
Project/proposal sde area (acres or sq ft.) , J 3 fic Y'?°_ ~
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft)
Assessor's parcel #(s) of project/proposai 4/~01U. 0 q47 7
Assessor's parcel #(s)of adjacent area owned or controlled
Street address of proposal ~~&7 4t q(_, 4EF ara
,
Existmg zone classification(s) and date established
Existmg use of property axq/p
Proposed zonmg -ur' l.~xl 6'1
ComprehensNe plan tegory 1,1_r School distnct
Water purveyor 0
k 5PC D''iP 4,ire distnct
Proposed use of property
Smgle family dwelimgs Duplexes ~ Multifamily dwellmgs
IVlanufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Other ( ) - Descnbe
List previous planning dNision actions involvmg 4his property
4~.4 rr~ Y-0 c 9' S-- 1,;2, 6 9
1 ~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PAGE 2 of 5
_r
.3so.c
Address and Location of proposal 7`- ~f~
~
Secfion ~ Township Range ~
Name of public/pnvate road(s) providing access 410
Vlydth of properiy front~ng on pubtic/private road ~L)
Does the proposal have aocess to an artenal or planned artenal? Yes No
Name(s) of artenal roads . ' . .h~t A
Legal descnpfi roperty for each zone reclassiflcation proposed
r
CL/I -
dnl4M!t
A/A
_ ~ .1 Lo~-~wq~
Rue
-LA- f~~h~~ r e~ ~ ►t h~~2
Existmg zone(s) CT to proposed zone(s)
c~
c~~~n
~or the fiollownng descnbed property . S ~
(Attach legal descnpbon stamped by la surveyor or provide below )
if you do not hold bbe to the property what is your interest in it?
VVhat are fhe changed conditions o# the area which you feeB make this proposal warranted?
~
-45 69
JrW-Ebf ( LY-P& _ LO)q-l~ fie-ce 47-9
i
~ ZONE FZECLASSIFICATION APPLKDATION +
PAGE 3 of, 5
What factors suppor4 the zone reclassificabon7
r ~
~ Consistency vuoth the Comprehensnre Plan / "eL
' LA!2 4-4W Li. el ea-1 a
e5"
~ ~ v~o ro r~, ~ 0-
+ L
)~Ya&Atent
Comp ~ance wri~ purpo~e of zoning rea - CAM
r J
Descnpbon of anged condibons of the area at you feei make this proposal warranted
AA Fz 14z~- fr c^. ".'o'c d
/
~
What impact will the proposed zone reclassificabon have on the adjacent properties?
a-11 Ca'j-''S da.~ W 066"&- cohd ti S~-r ~ P 7~
What measures do you propose to miagate your proposal s impact on surroundmg land use7
P~RT 11
~ FIRE Ma~~HALa. r FIRE DIsTRIcT
RCW 36 70 B requires early coordination and information
l4 THIS PROROSAL 1S NViTHIP9 FIRE PRi.TECTION DtSTRICT NO 1,
B WHAT IMPROVEiiJIIENTS NEED TU BE AIIADE TO MEET THE DISTRICTS FtRE RROTECTlOhI
REQIJIREMENTS?
C SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
D REQUIRED FIRE FL4W (gatlons per minute) 1 hav nevlewred fhe p osal and have advrsad the appllcant of the F1re Dlsfiict requrrements
_ 11~~ . ~r Pt°°cl's
SIGBVATURE TITLE DATE
~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AFrLICATION s ~
PnGE 4 of 5
,
~ !lVATEFt Pl9R!/EVOR
RCW 36 70 B requires early coordination and information A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN WATER DISTRICT Vioj&Vjf
C~
B SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW HAVE BEEN
11AADE AS FOLLOWS
A WATER SYSTEM P N AAUST BE PRER-ARED YES iV0 . REQUIREMENTS 3 -,-D l~2. 1~
i ~
4
C SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
: h e vi ~d the proposal and have advised the ap licant of t Distnct requirements
"X--- D
SIGNATURE TITL DATE
SP0KA6VE FtEG10NA1. HEAALTH DBSTRICT
RCW 36 70 B reqwres early coordinaUon and informaron
A PRELIMIIVAR S USSIOIV HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COAAPLETE APPLICAT ON MUST
IIVCLUDE rW~llrG _ d n/ bv.Aw A--t~
B ( ) SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
After a pneliminary review of the proposal 1 have adtrrsed the appl►cant of some of the
Spokane Reg~ nal Heaith requirements A comp/ete and derailed r+eview wdl be provided after the
applicahon is sub ed which will nesuit in a comp/ete list of requirements and conditrons r+sgarriing
Hea/th prowsl~' for the propos;~
i~ 7
' SIGNATURE TITLE E
~
SEViER Pl9R!lEVOR
~ (Cdy of Spokane or Liberty Lake)
65- RCW 36 70 B requires early ooordinagon and mfo abon
l4 PRELIIIAINARY DISCUSSIOiV HAS KEIV PLACE A COf1~PL APPLICATION IUlUST
I CLUDE ~ LrC ~ ~^f A A ~
~.e. s
~
B ( ) SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
After a prelrminary revreuv of the proposai ! have advised the applrcanf of some of the
Sewer requirements A complere anc0 detailed review wrll be provlded after fhe applicabon ►s
' submrtted, whrch Wlll result in a complete Ifst of requirements and conddfons regarrling Sewer provislons
for the proposal
cl~l
~ SIGNATURE TITLE DA
~
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANNLICATION A
PnGE 5 of 5
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I the undersigned a licensed land surveyor have completed the information requested fo the S/4
map and wntten legal description wASti,ti
.
v AT ~
Signed ~ f Date I Z./ 12.ld j
~
Address ~ ~ 4 9 44, ~.G Phone 9~ 6 j 3 Z L
V 9 3 b 7
City ~a ~ State ~ Zip
~ 2_9
ViL [Arto
PART OIU F 11 L5 7 17 03
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I the undersigned swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully
and to the best of my knowledge ~
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously identified
land use acbon or if not the owner attached herewith is wntten permission from the owner authorrzing
my actions on is er be If ,
Srgned Date tO ~
`
Address / Z eil ~7 ..._S~ _ Phone
City Y State L~ Zip
Sign ure o Applica or Representabve Date
State of Washmgton )
) ss
County of Spokane )
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on this LPM day of ~
by
iVotary Seal A~C;r
\SS~oN F~A S'~~~ fVotary Public in and for the State of Washmgton residing
~
~ .~e~ o ~yOTARY 9~ ~ 'I~ at
`
e~ U pu ~~~G ;~1Ay appointment expires
2 s °rb '
wAS~~ A PART IV
~ y..
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF PL.AiVNING
Date submrtted 1~.,-\~-M Fde number 1-9--201-Ot
Date aocepted \I„- S-2M ` By
Total fees e'blb Receipt number qq ss
i
w +
The 6Vest 80 00 feet of Lot 1 in Block 1 of WOODLO HEaGHTS as per
Plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 35,
EXCEPT the North 98 00 feet,
AND TOGETHER WITH the North 98 00 feet of Lot 1, EXCEPT the East
123 feet thereof,
AIdD INCLUDING that portion of Block 298 of OPPOItTUNITY as per plat
thereof recorded in Volume '°K'° of Plats, Page 20, lying Southerly
of Primary State Highway No 2 and Easterly of the Westerly line of
said Lot 1 extended Northerly to said Highway,
EXCEPT the East 123 feet thereof,
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington
SUBJECT TOo Second half general taxes for the year 1996,
Liability for potential supplemental assessment as aresult in
change in tax exempt status, Easements, restrictions,
reservations, provisions and agreements of record
vtiS ~14
OF WASy~
~
y
8967 4
EXPIRES 7it71 4 3
i • ,
SPOKANE COUNTY
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER DCC ~ ~ ~001
This agreement between Spokane County and ~ QIVISION OF PLANNINP
(na o perso )
whose interest in the project is ~ (,Yl(.°
(r. . o ner, a~~nt, (tc. ) '
is encered into this /7 day of _J~~o r , 206) 1.This agreement is applicable to the project
known as: ~ ~~D Onw`nbe ,i~ p ~.c'~
~ o t aress ~ ename r p at name p c~ or ~i~Wz .
ry - -
That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree
to the following:
1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of
the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane
County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will
be billed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, including any expenses incurred in the
collection of an overdue account, must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for
filing. If a project is approved and/or filed with a balance still owing, the unpaid balance shall be
paid within 30 days of the invoice date.
2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified
above.
3. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be considered delinquent. If any
outstanding balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date,
no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is
paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may
result in legal action or the initiation of other collection procedures, including referral to a
collection agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for
the collection of overdue accounts.
4. The monthly billing should be sent to:
NAN1E / :4TTENTION: / : S 4 io e,,r~
COMPANY:
ADDRESS: J o2 k~7 kA),
~
CITY, STATE: ~ fl~
ZIP CODE:
PHONE PHONE # 2:
FAX
E-Mail
I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of cne project or other
possible sanctions.
❑ If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a
principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then
written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee '
Agreement is attached to ' Fee greelly nt.
SIGNATURE By:. ; _ ~ _ ".4 1-~,
~ -
t~-i
(PRINT NAME)
RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS
Vflagreefee.doc 4/2001
1026 W Broadway Ave Spokane WA 99260-0170 (509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166
_ ,
♦
. ~ SpoKANE CouNvy DtVISION OF 113UILDING
,
~AND CODEENFORCEMENT
COE IOZC) WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050
SKx. CcXn~UY
r Site Information Project Information i ~
Site Address: 0 S ADDRESS UNKNOWN RD Project Number: 01010471 Inv: 2 Issue Date:
SPOKANE, WA 00000 Permit Use: Z,E-27-01 - UR-3.5 TO UR-7
Parcel Number: 45083.0497
Subdivision: ITNKNOWN Applicant: SEVERSON, AL
Block: Lot: 12807 S STARR RD
Zoning: UNK Unknown Contact: ROCKFORD, WA 99030-9720 Phone: (509) 291-4070
Owner: SEVERSON, ALVIlN A
Address: 12807 S STARR RD Phone:
ROCKFORD, WA 99030-9720
- Setbacks - FYont: Left: Right: Rear:
Building Ir►spector: DAN HOWARD
Water Dist:
Group Name:
Project Name:
~ Permits ~
Zone Chanee Contractor: Ucense
ENGINEERS REVIEW $200.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $75.00
REZ0NE:RS,UR7,UR12,UR22 1 $1,419.00 UTILTI'IES REVIEW $100.00
ToW Permit Fee: $1,794.00
~ Payment Summary
~
Total Fees AmountPaid AmountOwing Tran Date Recei t~# Pavment Amt
$1,794.00 $1,794.00 $0.00 12/19/01 9958 $1,794.00
Prncessed By: Buck, Marti pAyMENT
Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA Page 1 of 1
~
. ~ ~
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Division of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number: 9958 Customer Number
Projects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owing PAID Pmt
01010471 2 $1,794.00 $1,794.00 $1,794.00 $1,794.00 ~
Total: $1,794.00 $1,794.00 $1,794.40 $1,794.00
Miscellaneous Items
Total PAID: $1, 794. 00
Tender
Type Check Acct Balance CC Nbr Exp Date TENDERED
Check1 5046 1,794.00
Payer: AL SEVERSON
Total TENDERED: 1,794.00
Over /(Short) $0.00
Chang,, 0 ~0
Notes:
Tran Date / Time: 12/19/01 8:27:23 AM
By: GWendei
Logon User: gwendel
Station: GWENDEL
Override B Y:
l
Prijrted: 12i19,101 8:27:29 = f,1f Page 1 of I
. ~ i
REGEIVE.0
SPQKANFI Co""TY
i
~ F P~,N~ING
res pIVIS10N ~
ky
=lH ~ ~ ' ~ N
na
6r SI"fE p~A
X, ~ ° o~ RECORo
-rao
n5 ~ ~
1 '
~
a
W17 ju'-Jd ~~s
r
It
~ ~ ~
:~Lq
UA
9 _ 0 1
i;
~ ~ _ _ . . _ . .
~
1 ~ f
ZE-27-01 .
Vicinity Map
~
~ ~
M«ug«nny ~
~
Montgomcrv 3 1nn mc p
~ J
I
_ 09 K,°" I
L
~
y 1,
~Cfi 4 ~
~ •
~
~
~
$ Au~wa i
07
Miss;o, ,
Mcuwou
o -
sinto v"NY
~ Sinto .
~
Shaw
O
Z
17
~
Desmei
~ Jamie _
rn 3 a ~ ~
~ ~ _i~►.
Art)urB NessE/einentary
3
1 B~WBV o
Scale : 1 inch - 833 ft(rounded) 12120101 Ucinity Map
Parcel: 45083.0497
Owner: SEVERSON, ALVIN A
CoOwner:
Owner Address
12807 S STARR RD ROCKFORD WA 99030-9720 USA
r ~ ~
Site Address
0 ADDRESS UNKNOWN SPOKANE ~ -
Le al Descri tion ~ p Kno* -n
OPPORTUNITY & WOODLO HEIGHTS W 80.OOFf OF LT 1 BLK 1 ~p
OF WOODLO HEIGHTS & W 80.OOFT OF
ELY
200FT OF BLK 298 OF ' J
OPPORTUNITY
r ~
's
~ i g0 o i~--~-
~y~~
-n
J -
I ~ I
1
f 4
NoGce: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general 8 subject to constant revision. It is intended
for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency.
A7 ' s
~ ~ `~,a ~ _ _ ~ ~ + y M nv E • O -?b..._a"b • C06
o►'~N ~ - : ~ 'a ~ " 1i~ O J ~ ~ GO _
~ _ _ ~ ti~ ,~m ~ z~~ W
Q . 1
~y Ui. 9+s~ • ~ • ~ ~t S(r4 O ~
316S
o K N A ~ ^ ~ ,
~~z O ~I~ • '3: _ . ~ ~
~ 'A P v E -
3~ ~ 1 KNC) ' ( '
u ~
~ ~~3 _r 4 ~6a
~t=• ~ .ti `~r ~ t ~ t~ ~ ~ 't'q ~
YP ~3~a~ ► _
KNO% au E scoy "I141:0
~ _ • ~ i~ ~ ~3 ' ~ 1~. . ~ f ~ ~
rf , '4''; ' ~ s • q. , 5 ~ 9 : ;
,,.s • ` ' ~ s 7 . , ' ' '
~ h ~ 1 5~ ~ y;K l r OR 4LP~ ,
L.. i s• r a , r j , ~
7 ~ .a
, • s N + - . + . -
b t'J S
3f-O ~ ~ s 1 a Q , r ..tT ~ , ~ ''1~ r ;
IL ; i ~ Z, r s ~ O r:• ~r~
~N~~,"~&~~'"•~i 'uo ~ `~,t 1 ~~w A ~ ~ ~ -r * 's, • IPt~~s ~ ~
~ ~ ; .,f' a . 1 s~ ~ r c' t ~ p°`
- ,..••g• _ - , 1 J ~ ~ ~y ~ ' 1 5 ,
~ . 1it ~ ~'t ~ ~ L ` ,.~t Y. • - p.r/• ' ~
~P 78-01"
~w ~p' ~ r l ' il: •
~ ~ p ~ • ~ ,~P' ~ ; ~ ~ 1 `s
IL 4 ;
1 ~ :I. 1 S~-- ♦ , k 3 z~.~ r• .
: M +
~ . s ri/ ~ S ~ • Q - ~
. ~ . " '~f~L ~'0 .t~~ t.~ 1 ~ ~'s ~ t.
. 10
r ' ~s~J. `Ci* ` ~ h N 1 ~ ~b ~ .
ti.
W r ti~
~ 3 . f 7 p •I. ~ --~Q , ~ r!'
~ ~ 4' . ~v~, .=;r a
~ ~ k►►sSiO~"~ 10 ~ ~ ~ Q
n
~
Y tf'~!~ ~ SI~7~~wq ` 1 ' ~ • ` ~
` , ~ , , . ~ •.au--~-• t . . . ,
t'~?~~ N"( ~i!'~°' ~ 1, •'G~, ~ 1~~.', , ,r; - ~~»~"°f-„.
r~
h ,r. `t !~7nw . t~ ,1i~:~
ip
'irer.• 1 1 ~ 1:r ~'~yF~ ~ r .
yIL
~ T, I ~ ' „ ' . I y . ~ F N ► ~~'a' , j,'. . ♦
~ ~ z• f p~~ . ~
~ , ~ ' J •,A. y .
~ .y y~►l'r ~~f~-'^e,-r
~
.
. . .
,
s
, .
~
r.i 1, i . • ~ t j~ .
. , .
-
~ ~ , i~~. f • . - _ - ~
,
;
; ~ ~ " ~ ~ 1~` ~ •
,.a.ai
~ ~ s. ".~o' ~ , ~ ~
J ' ,,"J ♦ e ~
' ~ .
~ .
i' 40
41~
~`,~,y~ • - ~-`'^,t~ ~;'~'~,d~~yy~~ 8
~ a ' „~1, L~~ r 4 r i
14
~ t i i I YI► t, i 1~ ,
~
,.,Y !r •.~t~ r- ~
• ' ~ 3 ~ ~ ' ' ~ Za` ' ` ' ~G
i 4~ ~ w "~ri• _t;3 ' -
w . ; , l~1~~ ~;,,-,•.,,a.=.,M . ! ~ . ~i: ~33v'7~*-
@~p►;;t,yfilbc~S~va'a
{ [r • z• ~e'l~;l°'~ 'C.
~ +1 ~ W ~ ~ It~
~ ~ ~o ~~u.~•' Q,V
~II I rr r ~
~ '
J ~~,T, . « _ _-PHG _ IIlO~JY~YI ~ 'rr` 1
.
'v
Y 1,
1 ~
~
JOP%V pmM1 . . . .
.
: ~ . . . ~ ir.+r7~""' • ~ `c
, I j•••~ fQ W f A AV~•
` • • ~ ~ _ ~
r
. ,
; ~~f; .1~`► ~p~ r ~ ~ • c
: . , e.. f`L ~.7 , '
Zf~~ TP 4? ' ~
~ ~ .
20 ~ ~ 0+ • i
~ M 6 P ~ - • , .
~ : f~► t In • c~ ISM.
O ~ 'd' ~ , • ~ ' c~
# 3oe ~ M a ti~ - r I.•: ~
3cp
~ r ~ i,...
,
w
j ~ r =
2
=
~
01. Pb
~ : Y
t~