1981, 02-27 Permit: 81A-1879 MHFLAN NUMBER
.2/.2 7/1/
APPLICATION/PERMIT
SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING CODES DEPARTMENT
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON / SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260./ (509) 456-3675
APPLICANT: COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES - PRESS HARD TO MAKE 3COPIES
JOB ADDRESS
1.E /n9J5
LO T
2.
BLOCK
SU$DrVISION
3.
OWNER
ADDRESS
iog 1.7 6MrI
►A&
CONNTT ACTOR
4. ADDRESS
PHO E
Z.�O
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - SEE ATTACHED
PARCEL NUMBER/S 04543 — 0307
(1-oriiku
r )
Actual -Set Backs in Feet
North ' 'South 93'
0.09
East 0 7 West 39
H NE
Size of Parcel
7.5 x /SFr
Zone Classification
ZIP
Type Const.
Occupancy
R -3
,14�
Sprinklered
❑Yes ❑No 0 Req'd.
DESIGNER
PHONE
Valuation
Building Area in Sq. Ft.
JI /iiL'r�a
ADDRESS
ZIP
Main Floor
1174171
Upper Floors
Garage Area
•
Storage
CHANGE OF USE FROM
6.
TYPE
7..' OF
WORK
DESC
8.
TO
eiNIEW 0 ALT: ,,t❑,/AD N. 0 RPL.
0 BLD. 0 PLMB. Ln'J MECH'. E M.H.
IBE WORK 14.6m 6 ( (2.4 x„:„
ELECTRIC
VALUATION
9 ICS 000
SOURCE
OF
UTILITIES
GAS
Area of Decks F
i Ish Basement Unfin. Basement
❑ MVE.
0 POOL
0 OTHER
No. Baths
Q
N. Stories
/
No.
`7 RRooms
No. of Dwellings
CERTIFICATE
of EXEMPTION
Req'd: -
Rec'd.
Not Req'd.
Enum. Dist.
ILocation (Area)
WATER
( lM .
SEWER
Ownership
Public ❑ Private (l
USE CODE
1 herebj certify that I have read and examined this application and have read the "NOTICE" provisions included
on reverse side, and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this
type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume
to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any otherstate or local law regulating construction or the
performance of construction. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
DATE OF APPLICATION —x-'74 —?/ SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
SPECIAL APPROVALS
7 NAME DATE
e h
Planning
.Fire Marshall
C .En ieer
UtiTl e
Plans Examiner
SEPA Checklist
Ing.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
V6 12, -
fPOl -VcamCT 'E4T3'F02 aIa4)gl
PERMIT IS NONTRANSFERABLE
' PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE
FEES COLLECTED
. Single $
Building
Plumbing
Mech.
Plan Check
SEPA •00
-
I"l
Mobile Home
Other (Specify)
PERIGII'I- NUMt3ER
03* *90.0
*9,00
*9.006
A *0,00
1 '8 7.i7.g
:0'2F -27=8y1
4479,
0'7.*.
* 1 00.00
*10000
'*100006
A *0,0.0
0'2'-`2781
6479.
>-
0
.
U
W
—J
WHEN MACHINE VALIDATED IN THIS SPACE,
THIS BECOMES A PERMIT.
+, 1 ' 'r
0211.i12.1.7,,,-8
DATE ISSUED
1 8 i7.-91.
PERMIT NO.
0'9. 0,0 -
T-OTAL
1
BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR OF
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF:
APPLICANT: CHARLOTTE RALEIGH )
REQUEST: RELAXATION OF FRONTAGE REQ. )
COUNTY CODE: 4.104.040 •
DECISION
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSION OF LAW
FILE NUMBER: VE -12-81
PARCEL #: 04543-0307 and 0309
DATE OF HEARING: February 11, 1981
DATE OF DECISION: February, 13, 1981
DATE OF WRITTEN DECISION: Feb. 19, 1981
DECISION
The application is approved.
INTRODUCTION
This matter being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor for Spokane
County and pursuant to Chapter 4.25, Section 4.25.010, the Zoning Adjustor
has the authority to hear and decide such matters coming before him. After
conducting a public hearing to receive all public testimony and after review-
ing the public record, examining available information, and visiting the pro-
perty and surrounding area, the Zoning Adjustor in accordance with Chapter
36.70.810 Revised Code of Washington, and Section 4.25.030 of the county
zoning ordinance hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of law hereinbelow stated.
The applicant, Charlotte Raleigh filed an application:on January 15,
1981 requesting a variance approval for relaxation of the required public road
frontage in order to construct a sinale.family residence on a parcel of land
1 1/4 acre in size. The property is located on Empire Avenue East of Spokane
in Section 11, Township 25, Range 44.
This matter was heard before tie—Zoning Adjustor on February 11, 1981.
After receiving public testimony and accepting the file from the Clerk
to the Zoning Adjustor placed this matter under advisement for review and
decision.
That on February 13, 1981, the Zoning Adjustor having completed review
of the file concluded there are sufficient grounds to support a decision of
approval.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The site is zoned agricultural which permits one single family residence
on a parcel of land 12,500 square feet in size and having at least 100 feet
of public road frontage. The applicant's parcel contains an existing single
family residence and in order to create another building site, a variance
approval was required.
II.
The applicant had testified that the existing residence was deteriorating
and in need of repair. The second residence would become the applicant's
residence while repairing the existing structure.
The access will be by a non-exclusive easement located at the westerly
portion of the subject property. The easement has not been described nor re-
corded at the time of filing this application.
IV.
All matters before the Zoning Adjustor are reviewed by agencies of
jurisdiction with the following agencies submitting recommendations to the
Zoning Adjustor for consideration:
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE: No response was received.
SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: No response was received.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: In a memo dated February 4, 1981, it was
noted that the -project site is located over the Spokane Aquifer and within
the water service area of Irvin Water District. It was recommened that water
service be coordinated through the Director of Utilities and that on-site
sewage disposal system shall be approved by the Health Office. Further, it
was recommendedthat the applicant shall agree not toprotest legal assessments
to provide central sewerage service to this lot.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: The file contains memorandums that the
proposal does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act
and that the division of land may be created with the execution of an Indemnity
Agreement.
The Clerk of the Zoning' Adjustor presented the file at the hearing noting that
it was found complete and ready for hearing by the Planning Department.
V.
From on-site review, the Zoning Adjustor finds that the proposed easement
access is adequate to provide legal and physical access to the subject oro-
perty. That sight visibility to Empire Avenue is good for safe vehicular
access.
VI.
The opportunity was afforded at the hearing to any interested persons to
testify regarding the applicant's proposal. No one appeared nor any written
comments were received in opposition.
VII.
Any Conclusions of Law stated hereinbelow which is deemed a Finding of
Fact is hereby adopted as the same.
From these Findings of Fact, the Zoning Adjustor concludes these:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
That the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County has jurisdiction over the .
issuance of the building permit for the project to the applicant pursuant to_
the provisions of Chapter 36.70.810 RCW and Section 4.25.030 of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance.
II.
That the applicant submitted an application to the Planning Department
requesting a public hearing before the Zoning Adjustor, and that pursuant to
Chapter36.70.840'land Section 4.25.040 of the zonino ordinance, notice for a
public hearing was given through the United States mail to all property owners.
within a radius of 300 feet from the subject property.
That all citizens notified and agencies having jurisdiction were afforded
the opportunity to testify or submit written comments on the proposed project.
PAGE 3
VE -.12-81
IV.
That in review of the assessor's mans for this general vicinity, it is
found that there are other divisions both smaller and larger in size which do
not have the required frontage on a public maintained road as specified by
the zoning ordinance. Therefore, this action does not constitute the granting
of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitation placed upon other pro-
perties in the vicinity and under the same Zone classification as cited in
Chapter 36.70.810 RCW, a:nd if denied, the applicant would be deprived of a
minimum and basic right to construct a single family residence on a parcel of
land which. has been found to be sufficient in size to support such a use.
V.
The Zoning Adjustor finds that the proposed use on a parcel consisting
of 1 1/4 acres and having physical access is a reasonable request for relaxa-
tion of the zoning ordinance. Denial would be an unreasonable imposition upon
the applicant.
VI.
That this action was taken after finding that the public health, safety
and general welfare will not be infringed upon. That furthermore, this action
conforms to the intent of the zoning ordinance and general comprehensive plan -
adopted for Spokane County. That reasonable assurance have been provided to
guarantee that adequate access will be provided.
VII.
The Zoning Adjustor finds that the applicant's project would be compatible
to the surrounding neighborhood and would be improving the subject property
with new construction.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I.
That the proposed project shall be in substantial conformance to the plot
plan on file.with,.this application, and shall observe all setback requirements
as provided by the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
II.
That an on-site sewage disposal system shall be approved by the County
Health Officer.
That the subject property shall not be further subdivided unless said
division is in compliance with Chapter 58.17 RCW and applicable county ordin-
ance governing such divisions. Any such divisions shall be in compliance
with the adopted comprehensive plan.
IV.
The applicant shall obtain the required building permits before commencing
construction.
V.
That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
complete the following:
1) That an Indemnity Agreement be executed with Spokane County creating
a legal division of land for building purposes.
VE -12-81
2) That a non-exclusive easement be legally described and recorded
with the County's Auditor's Office. Said easement description
shall be at least 20 feet in right of way width and located on
.the westerly portion of subject property.
yG l -
ENTERED THIS `/ DAY, OF -I /j.- c. c:.•. , 1981 PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY GRANTED UNDER COUNTY CODE, SECTION 4.25.
ATT,E BY:
CLERK TO THE
r) —
0NING ADJUS R
THOMAS L. DAVIS
ZONING ADJUSTOR FOR SPOKANE.
COUNTY, WASHINGTON
•
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 3-, GRANDVIEW ACRES, ACCORDING
TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME "K" OF PLATS, PAGE 12, IN SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 15; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE
OF LOT 15, A DISTANCE OF 158 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOTS
14 AND 15, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 14; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY
ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY LINE OF THE SPUR TRACK OF THE SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SPUR TRACK RIGHT OF WAY TO A POINT
ON A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 100 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 15; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH
THE, NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15, TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE
DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 4 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE OF LOT 14.
ra
o•iirtr v1/41/k-13