ZE-0041-97
RECE VED
• D E C 0 5 1997
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EX.ANIINER
` SPOKANECOUMY ENGINEER
RE: Zone Reclassification from Light Industrial ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
(I-2) Zone to Heavy Industrial (I-3) Zone ) CONCLUSIONS
Applicant: Fred LeFriec ) AND DECISION
File No. ZE-41-97 )
1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassification of approximately two acres of land from
the Light Industrial (I-2) zone to the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone, for those uses allowed in the
Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone.
Decision: Approve the rezone application to allow the expansion of the existing specialty
metal finishing/electroplating use as proposed in the site development plan; allow other I-3 uses
that are also permitted uses in the I-2 zone, subject to administrative site plan review; and allow
other I-3 uses subject to the submittal of a change of conditions application and a public hearinc.,.
All development is subject to the development standards of the I-2 zone.
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following fndings of fact and conclusions:
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: Fred LeFriec, 1504 East 64`h Avenue, Spokane, WA 99223
Agent: Ron Kelling, 4114 East Broadway, Spokane, WA 99202
Address: 2616 North Locust Road, Spokane, WA
Location: Generally located of and adjacent to Locust Road, approximately 500 feet north of
Montgomery Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section S, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
Legal Description: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of Binding Site Plan 86-15, Auditors number
5709110303, being a portion of Tracts 1 through 4 and Tracts 6 and 7.
Zoning: Light Industrial (I-2)
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Industrial category of the
Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The property is also located within the
Priority Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Plan.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 1
. •
Eovironmental Review. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division ,
of Building and Planning on August 22, 1997.
Site Description: The site is flat, slightly more than two acres in size, and involves two
legal lots in a binding site plan (File No. BSP 86-15) approved in 1987. The northerly parcel is
fully developed with an existing electroplating use, described as a specialty metal finishing
business. The southerly parcel is vacant and undeveloped.
Surrounding Conditions: The site is located on the east side of Locust Road, south of the
Burlington Northern Railway main track line and south of Trent Avenue. Approximately 500
feet south of the site, Locust Road intersects Montgomery Avenue, which is designated by the
County Arterial Road Plan as a Minor Arterial. Argoruie Road, designated as a Principal
Arterial, lies west of the site, and provides a route to Interstate 90 to the south. Argonne Road
and Trent Avenue, which is a state highway, are major traffic and commercial comdors through
the Spokane Valley area. The land surrounding the site is zoned I-2, except for Community
Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zoning to the west. The land north and south of the
site has commercial uses or is undeveloped, and the land east of the site has commercial uses.
The land west of the site includes a fitness club and a shopping center.
Project Description: The existing electroFlating business is a non-conforming use in the
I-2 zone which applies to the site. The applicant requests approval of I-3 zoning to allow
expansion of the existing business on the northerly parcel and extension of the business to the
southerly parcel. The site plan of record shows an otfice, shop, warehouse and shipping/
receiving area on the northerly parcel, along with parking for 24 vehicles and existing
landscaping. The site plan illustrates a proposed 10,800 square foot building for an office, shop
and warehouse on the southerly parcel, 42 additional parking spaces and required landscaping
along Locust Road.
B. PROCEDURAL INFOR1v1ATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.402 and 14.634
Hearing Date and Location: September 17, 1997, Spokane County Public Works
Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: August 26, 1997 by applicant
Posted: August 29, 1997 by applicant
Published: August 29, 1997
Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met.
Site Visit: September 13, 1997
Heariog Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure). •
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Paye 2
I
il
T estiiliony: I
Louis Webster Fred LeFriec 'Division of Building and Planning 1504 East 64"' Avcnue ,
1026 West Broadway SpoI.anc. V"A 11)0221~, Spokane, WA Dwight Humc
107 South Howard,
S~l~l}~;111C, WA ()()'()j
IteIl1S NOt1Ced: 5Pl7kcZllt; COl1Tlty
Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0291.
"LU.vE FZECLASSIFIC.1"I,IUN AN.-1LYSIS:
In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that (1) t~
is no presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that
conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and (3) the
rezone proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare.
Parkridee v. Seattle, 98 Wn. 2d 4541) 462 (1978); Biarnson v. Kitsav Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840 ~
(1995). Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.402 (1)(2) indicates that consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, detriment to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant
criteria to consider in amending the Zoning Code.
The proposed rezone must also be consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code, the
State Environmental Policy Act, the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, and other
i, i i ic' r~~•1' lirr~ tl •^11 : .;t„. tapplicable land use regulations. Cor.'.;t;~~;.
proposal with applicable regi:'::: ~
The following findings oi iact aiiLi coilciusiorls ai-e iilau~2:
1. The nrouosal Qenerallv conforms with the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan.
A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearing body in making a rezone
decision. Belcher v. Kitsao Countv, 60 Wn. App. 949, 953 (1991). Deviation from a
comprehensive plan does not necessarily render a rezone illegal, only general conformance is
required. Bassani v. Countv Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 396 (1993).
The property is located in the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Industrial
category is intended to provide the opportunity for industrial development and reserve land for
industrial purposes. The Industrial category contemplates a variety of industrial, mining and
transportation uses. Few commercial and residential uses will be found. Open areas for
buffering and screening, industrial activities may be needed. Small-scale activities related to
industrial uses such as cafes, service stations and parts and service stores may be found in this
category. Industrial areas should be served by a high level of urban services, such as public
water, sewers and utilities. See Industrial category, "Detailed Definition". Relevart I-)olicies c:
1I'_ T._I,. , ,1 ,I fll, qt,irr~ 1't ~lTI r~I r
. . . . i; . . . .
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 3
The site is currently zoned Light Industrial (I-2). Zoning Code 14.632.100 states as
follows, regarding such zone: +
The purpose of the I-2 zone is to meet the needs for industrial land
identified in the Industrial Category of the Comprehensive Plan.
Industrial uses in this zone will include processing, fabrication, light
assembly, freight handling and similar operations, all of a non-offensive
nature. It is the intent of the I-2 zone to allow for these uses by making
them compatible with surrounding uses. General characteristics of these
areas include paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, a full
line of public services including manned fire protection and public
transit accessibility.
The applicant proposes to rezone the site to the I-3 zone, to allow its existing electroplating
and specialty metal finishing business to become a conforming use and to allow its expansion on
the site. Zoning Code 14.634.100 states as follows:
The purpose of the I-3 zone is to implement the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan, providing and protecting areas for primary
manufacturing industries. These industvies generally process raw
materials into products or byproducts and, therefore, it is the intent of this
zone to make these industries as compatible as possible with surrounding
uses by requiring standards to ensure compatibility. General
characteristics of these areas include paved streets and sidewalks, public
sewer and water, and a full line of public services, including manned fire
protection and public transit accessibility.
In 1996, the County Zoning Code was amended to allow several new uses in the industrial
zones of the Zoning Code. See Zoning Code Chapter 14.629, and County Resolution No. 96-
0787. In the I-2 zone, this included the addition of a number of light industrial and conunercial
tlses, as well as virtually all uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone, provided the
development standards of the B-3 zone were met. In the I-3 zone, this included the addition of
some but not all of the new commercial and industrial uses added to the list of permitted uses in
the I-2 zone. This addition of commercial uses to the industrial zones recognized that industrial
uses generate a demand for commercial services. The new uses allowed in the I-3 zone included
"exercise facility/gym athletic cltib", but did not include general retail sales or grocery store uses.
The Industrial category in the general area extends from Locust Avenue east for several
blocks, and from Trent Avenue south to Interstate 90. Much of the land in such Industrial
category is zoned I-2 and developed for light industrial uses, while none of the land is zoned I-3.
The land west of the site is designated in the Major Commercial category, and is zoned and
developed for comrriercial uses. Tlie court appointed receiver for Argonne Village objected to
the proposal. See letter dated 9-10-97 from James Craven, attorney at law, to the Hearing
Examiner; letter dated 8-8-97 from Tomlinson Black Management Inc. to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning; and testimony of Dwight Hume. Argonne Village owns
undeveloped land lying east of the site, across Locust Road, and operates a shopping center
between such land and Argonne Road. VVhile not objecting to the proposed use of the site, the
receiver contended that the proposed I-3 zone was not compatible with the shopping center use
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 4
and could diminish the value of the shopping center property, zoned B-3. The receiver expressed
concern over the conversion of the property to other, more offensive heavy industrial uses, and
the establishment of a precedent for other I-3 uses in the vicinity. The receiver recommended
that a conditional use pennit be issued to allow the applicant's proposed business expansion.
The Staff Report found the proposal to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The
Examiner adopts the analysis of the consistency of the proposal with the Industrial category
found on page 4 of the Staff Report. The primary issue is whether the impacts of the proposal
can be adequately buffered from adjoining uses. The applicant has demonstrated that the
business is compatible with the surrounding I-2 uses and commercial uses, and there is no reason
to thinl: that the expansion of the business as proposed will not be compatible with such uses or
devalue them. The record indicates that the project will meet the standards of the I-2 zone, as
well as the I-3 zone.
Zoning Code 14.508.040 provides for the expansion of extension of a non-conforming use
through the issuance of a conditional use permit under the standards and process set forth in
Zoning Code Chapter 14.404. The Examiner has no authority at this time to approve a
conditional use permit for the project in lieu of the requested rezone, since this would require a
separate application. County Planning staff recommended against the option of a conditional use
permit, on the basis that the applicant was seeking to extend the use to a separate building lot -
which was undeveloped. This would also delay the project for several months.
The Examiner does agree with the receiver for Argonne Village that I-3 zoning is generally ~
not appropriate for the area, and that many I-3 uses developed on the site or in the vicinity could
negatively impact adjoining uses. However, the proposal can be appropriately conditioned to
address such concerns. The Examiner has added conditions of approval limiting development of
the site to the currently proposed use; to uses allowed in the I-3 zone which are also allowed in
the I-2 zone, subject to administrative site plan review; and to other uses in the I-3 zone subject
to the submittal of a change of conditions application and public hearing. A condition has also
been added requiring any development of the site to comply with the development standards of
the I-2 zone. The Examiner has also added a statement indicating that approval of the project
should not establish a precedent for the development of other I-3 zone uses on the site, which are
not allowed uses in the I-2 zone, or establish a precedent for the approval of other rezones to the
I-3 zone in the vicinity.
2. Conditions in the area in which the propertv is located have chanp-ed substantiallv since the
propertv was last zoned.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. Countv
Commissioners, 70 VVn. App. 389, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a
comprehensive plan. Biarnson, at 846; Save OLir Rural Environment v. Snohomish Countv, 99
Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983).
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 5
As disctissed above, the proposal as conditioned is generally consistent with the .
Comprehensive Plan. The growth of the business on the northerly parcel, the improvement of
Montgomery Avenue and the extension of public sewer to the area could also be cited as changed
conditions.
3. The DroDOSed rezone does bear a substantial relationship and is not detrimental to the nublic
health, safetv and eeneral welfare.
General consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in determining
whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani, at 396-98. As
noted, the proposal generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Very little opposition was
expressed to the proposal by the public, and the concerns expressed by the owner of property
west of the site has been addressed through the conditions of approval. The proposal as
conditioned is adequately buffered from adjacent land uses.
4. The nronosed zone chanae complies with the provisions of the State Environmental Policv
Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance.
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane
C: unty Code have been met. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the Determination of
Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning. No adverse comments were
received from public agencies that would dictate a need for withdrawal of such environmental
determination.
5. The nronosal, as conditioned, complies with the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone, the Spokane
Countv Zonine Code (SCZC). and annlicable land use rec-rulations.
The proposal has been conditioned for compliance with the applicable requirements of the
Zoning Code and other applicable regulations. No deficiencies were identified in the public
record. The proposal appears consistent with the development standards of the I-2 zone, as ~,vell
as the I-3 zone.
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a zone
reclassification is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies
specified below.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development.
HL Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 6
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone(s) as ainended; pf-ovirlecl,
any development on the site shall comply with the development standards of the Light Industrial
(I-2) zone, as amended.
3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept
presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Division Director/desibnee,
may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, and landscape plans.
Variations proposing uses that are allowed in the I-3 zone which are also allowed uses in the I-2
zone may be approved administratively by the Division Director/designee. Variations propos>>,<_-
zrses allowed in the I-3 zone (except for the current electroplating/specialty metal finishing ust -
which are not allowed uses iri the I-2 zone may be approved only after the submittal of a chan.;,
of conditions application and a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. All variations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original
intent of the development plans shall be maintained. Any development on the site shnll comply
with the development standards of the I-Z zone as amended. .
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to
the Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior
to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight
distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
5. The Division of Building & Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building & Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by
a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official oa , imposing
a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and
copying in the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning.
6. This decision shall not be cortstrtred to establish a precedent for the approval of other tises
ctllotived in the Heavy Indacstrial (I-3) zone in the vicinity, or for the approval of other icses on the
site tivhich are not allotived i.cses in the Light Indacstrial (I-2) zone, as amended.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 7
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
J
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
.
5. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this Proposal.
6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
SPOKANE R.EGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized.
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 8
S1'OKANE CUUN`I'Y DIVISION OF UTILITIES
.
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system is to be constructed.
Sewer connection permit is required.
2. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval.
3. The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit.
4. Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance
of sewer connection permit.
5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 9
.
DATED this 5"' day of December, 1997.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
r
Micha6l C. DemPseY, WSBA #825'5
c/
~
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
deternzination is finai and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9)
indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the board of county commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision.
This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on December 5, 1997.
DEPENDING ON WHICH APPEAL PERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGALLY
APPLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER DECEMBER 15, 1997 OR
DECEMBER 19, 1997.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period
with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245. The file may be inspected during normal
working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, eYCept holidays, between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by
Spokane County ordinance.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-41-97 Page 10
~ -
. ~
• ~
~
_ , o. - ' •~.w 7
~
o~ ~c , m .
a►~ ~ ~
~
~ - ~ a ~
F 1 ~ i o~` p .
p4~,..~
~
a
. ~
Duc4E. Y ~
d -
6`~ • ~ % ~ g p~ ,
jlmj~
~ r t G ~ r~/ ` µ0
N ~
t . ~
,
,
~ ~ i • - ~ ~ ~~,`'a~ ~ ~,P ~
y
" P +~..L
.
y ' ^ ' 9' ~ 0'~~ ~/►l~,.!,_..,~ 1
llo"~ ~de
~ x
s L.
~ i
~ } r~ 4 t s
0
~ e~► ~
9 -
, t
j a~~1'~'~ 0 (g•
~ R
! Q h-
~ c
1
~ ~ - - -
~
e
t ::w: ~.t'YL'~' ~ ~ "'1L.■ S
.srw~r „w„ 1
~ "r r ~ art
M
r ~q~a •
r
"r~.'~...
T A, m• ~ ~ . -,rs`
f f roo "u ~ t"p t • '.w' ww w~' i ~ _ y 8 P
~ ~ ~ -~~M `I{~ I ~~r~ #
Ji°°.'....
~'D~~ b R U Ml ~ IP
~~qo%x r+~ I
, 9 ,n .eJ o w ~ ~ .u ~ w+ ~ ' ~.s u r we~ W's Nb +
ft2ogw My~40~.~. .MV mom Ay„~ ~ w
~{~Ip~~y Je
W ~w p I v
M~ ~ y w9
wr :
y ~ ' d •
•~~~"7~`";~~ p 0
1 t t~~I- ~i ti ~ s ~ ► ~~q
, s E
ma ~z
jpC I
.J
I IMO 1M~ y y ~
I. IY~~ b`6M,w ~ r~ { 3
rmoc E.'Y~D '2 J
, ~ ~ et0
~ SPOKANE CDui~i1T
Q plot Plan ,
~ V-A~ " A ( 2
1
~ p ~ ~MMJ 1
aroLL
~ ~ NQF8U1lD1PfG P1.Ai~
w ° 01VISI0 ~
5Y 0~ ~FCORD
Canceled File jEAGINEER IS~VIVW SHILE1
Date Fifed
Date As Built Plans Received
Date Road Plans Approved REZ0NE FILE # ZE-0041-97 '97
New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Jl:
Companion File tt:
Hearing Date: 09/17/1997 H Time: 01:30 H Number: 1 Related File ►35Y-0n1 <1
Technical Review Date: 06/19/1997 TR Time: 01:15 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: TECH REVIENi #
Date Received: 05/29/1997 Review Type: Large Loc ❑ Bldg. Syuare Feet:
No. Lots: No. Acres: 2.11
Project Name: I-2 TO I-3 NOVATION FAC Range-Township-Secaon: 44-25-8
Site Address: ELOCUST/N MONTGOMERY/S TRENT PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Applicant Name: KELLING. RON Phone (509) 535-46$8 45082.1829 45082.1830
Applicant Adciress: 4414 E BROADWAY Phone 2#
SPOKANE, WA 99202
Date Conditions Mailed:
1~ -L (c -~l
Flooci Zone: No Water Source: Sewer Source: School Dist: 363 Fire Dist: 1 Phone Dist:
Billing Name: Owner: LE FRIEC, FRED Engineer: MICHAEL C PHILLIPS
Address: Owner Address: 2615 N LOCUST Company: SDOSON ENGINEERS i". J
SFOKANE. WA 94206 Address: 909 N ARGONNE RI )
SPOKANE w A Q<r_ 1 ^
Phone: Owner Phone: (509) 922-1912 phone (509) 926-
Fi x
Signed Name
Building # 456-3675 / Planning # 456-2205 Contact: LOUIS WEBSTL k
Date Submitted Description Initials ~
06/19/1997 DATE TECHNICALLY COMPLETL-
DATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETF
DATE PAY FEES RECENED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
In-0ut Nl In-0ut A"2 in-Out #3
DFSIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-Ot 1"I'
In-Out #4 In-Out p5 1n-4ut #6
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATF RONI) RFCFIVI?D RONn .AMOi?NT RFCF1vT`!)
i i: b i):vll i:LLi:AJL - U:1 I LBUivDi~-L-DLCLU BUNu 13;1L;'ifvCL-
%Hearing Date Decision Approved Denied Conanued Appealed BCC Apprnved Denied
Appealed to Court Approved Denied Continued F"inal Proiecc Siatu.
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHr1ICIAN (SYL)
i / STAMPED 208 LOT PI_ANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
~~led ENGINEM" S AEVIEW SHEE'1'
Dace Filed
Date As Built Plans Received
Datt Road Plans Approved DR REZONE FILE # ZE-0041"97 '97
New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar y:
Companion File
Related File BSP-15
Hearing Date: H Time: H Number:
DESIGN Review Date: 06/19/1997 DR Time: 01:15 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: DESIGN REVIEW #
Date Received: 05129/ 1997 Review Type: Large Lot Bldg. Square Fecc:
No. Lots: No. Acres: 2.11
Project Name: 1-2 TO I-3 NOVATION FAC Range-Township-Section: 44-25-8
Site Address: ELOCUST/N MONTGOMERY/S TRENT PaitCEL(S): (first 20)
Applicant Name: KELLING, RON Phone (509) 535-4688 45082•1829 45082.1$30
Applicant Address: 4414 E BROADWAY Phone 2#
SPOKANE, WA 99202
Date Condidons Mailed:
Flood Zone: No Water Source: Sewer Source: School Dist: 363 Fire Dist: 1 Phone Dist:
Billing Name: Owner: LE FRIEC, FRED Engineer: MICHAEL C PHILLIPS
Address: Owner Address: 2615 N LOCUST Company: SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC
SPOKANE. WA 99206 Acidress: 909 N ARGONNE RD
SPOKANE WA 94212
Phone: Owner Phone: (509) 922-1912 Phone: (W) 926-1322
Fax:
Signed Name
Building # 456-3675 / Planning # 456-2205 Contact: LOUIS WEBST'ER
Date Submitted Description Initials
-7 DATE TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
DATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
DATE PAY FEES RECENED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
In-Out N1 In-Out A►2 In-Out N3
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT
In-Out aa In-0ut #S In-Out Afb
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED ~
DATE BOND RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASE - DATE BOND REDUCED BOND BALANCE
Hearing Date Decision Approved Denied Continued Appealed BCC Approved Denied
Appealed to Court Approved Derued Continued Final Project Staws
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERNLIT TECHMCIAN (SYL)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
~
RECEVED
. .
. ~
SEP 15 1997
SPOKANE COUMY ENGINEER
,
~ STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE ZE-41-97
III~~~
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOKANE G ~
HEARING DATE: September 17, 1997 FILE ZE-41-97
PROJECT PLANNER: Louis Webster, AICP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request to change the zoning on 2+ acres, from I-2 to I-3,
generally located north of Mission Avenue, east of and adjacent to
Locust Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, as conditioned, of the zone change
request.
Project Data
Project Location: 2616 N. Locust Road, north of Mission Avenue, east
of Argonne Road and west of Pines Road, S8,T25,
R44
Parcel Number(s) 45082.1829 and 45082.1830, S8325, R44.
Owner: Fred LeFriec
2616 N. Locust Road
Spokane, WA 99206
Agent: Ron Kelling
4114 E. Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99202
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Industria!
Zoning: Light Industrial (I-2)
Existing Land Use: Industrial and vacant
Surrounding 2oning and Land Uses:
• North: Light Industrial (I-2) zoning; Spokane Dog Club,
undeveloped and Freeway
• South: Light Industrial (I-2) zoning; vacant and commercial
• East: Light Industrial (I-2) zoning; commercial
• West: Community Business (B-2) zoning; Stroh's Fitness
Center
Known Land Use Proposals and None known
Recent Project Approvals in the
Area of this Project
Land Division Status: Legal lots of record. Lots 2 and 3 of BSP-15-86
Shoreline Designation: Not Applicable
' i
, A ~
Water Purveyor: Modem Electric UVater Conipany
Sewage Disposal: Public Sewer System Fire District FD #1
School District West Valley School District.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: Mission Avenue is a Minor Arterial and is located
approximately 500 feet south of the subject property.
Nearest Parks and Distance: Valley Mission Park is located approximately 1 mile
east of the subject property.
Neighborhood Association: None known
• This proposal is located inside the IUGA.
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural
Resource Lands.
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area (PSSA /ASA): Subject property is located within the
Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA).
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
(list species and if a habitat plan was prepared): Critical Area Maps.
Floodplain (list Designation) : Not Applicable.
Geologically Hazardous Areas (list soil types None illustrated on the Spokane County
and hazard types): Critical Area Maps.
Wetlands (list type and category, per County info. None illustrated on the Spokane County
and / or wetlands report): Critical Area Maps or Wetland Inventory
Maps.
SEPA
• DNS issued on 8-22-97.
• Comment period ends 9-15-97.
Noticinq
Published: Spokesman Review on 8-29-97.
Mailed: Notice mailed to 17 property owners on 8-26-97.
Site Posted: 8-29-97.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete): 5-28-97
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: 7-22-97
Date Notice of Decision is Due: 11-19-97
Reviewinq Aqencies ~
17 Agencies were notified on 5-29-97 and 8-22-97. Comments were due on 6-19-97 and 9-3-97.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
I Received Received Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes ' 8-25-97 Washington State No
of Engineering and Department of Ecology
ZE-41-97
Staff Report - September 17, 1997 Hearing
2 of 4
. .
Roads, Transportation
Spokane County Division Yes 8-25-97 Washington State No
of Engineering and I Department of
Roads, Drainage Transportation (WSDOT)
Spokane County Division Yes 8-22-97 Spokane Regional No
of Long Range Planning Transportation Council
Spokane County Division Yes 6-23-97 Spokane Transit No
of Utilities-Sewer I Authority
Spokane County Division No ~ Washington State No
of Utilities-Water Boundary Review Board
Resources
Spokane Regional Health Yes 6-19-97 "West Valley School No
District ! District No. 363
Spokane County Parks, No ~ Spokane County Air No
Recreation & Fair ; Pollution Control
! Authority
Modern Electric Water No ~ Fire District No. 1 Yes 6-11-97
Company I
Resaonses from the Public:
One letter was received from John Bennett, President of Tomlinson Black Management, Inc. dated 8-8-97 in
which he objected to the proposed reclassification because of possible diminution in land value to adjacent
property that Tomlinson Black Management is responsible for. No other responses from the public have been
received.
Description of the Site:
The site involves two Spokane County Tax Parcels and 2+ acres. The northern parcel, involving less than '/Z of
the total acreage is flat and is fully developed. The southem parcel is slightly more than'/z the total acreage, is
flat, vacant and undeveloped. The northern parcel is the existing business, Novation, Inc. which does specialty
metal finishing. The applicant proposes to enlarge the existing business on the northern parcel and to further
expand operations to the southern parcel. Access to the site is from Locust Road.
Backqround:
The applicant submitted the rezone proposal to the Division of Building and Planning on May 28, 1997. The
proposal is a request to change the zoning on 2+ acres, from I-2 to I-3. The subject property is lots 2 and 3 of
Binding Site Plan BSP 86-15 which was recorded September 11, 1987. The original Binding Site Plan was
altered and re-recorded January 19, 1996. A building permit was issued September 24, 1990 when the subject
property was zoned Restricted Industrial (RI). The business was therefore legally established under the old
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. On January 1, 1991, the zoning changed to Light Industrial (I-2) pursuant
to the Program to Implement the Zoning Code and the use became a legal, non-conforming use since
electroplating of inetal is allowed only in the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone. The applicant wishes to expand the
existing facility on the northern parcel and also to expand the business to the southern parcel. The applicant
has requested the zone change to Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone to allow expansion of the existing business on
the existing northern parcel and to allow expansion of the business to the southern parcel.
The site plan shows the existing Novation, Inc. business on the northern parcel consisting of an office, shop,
warehouse and shipping/receiving area, parking for 24 vehicles and existing landscaping per Spokane County
Zoning Code Development Standards. The site plan also shows a proposed 10,800 square foot
office/shop/warehouse on the southem parcel, 42 additional parking spaces, and five feet of Type III
ZE-41-97
Staff Report - September 17, 1997 Hearing
3 of 4
. .
landscaping. Section 14.802.040 (38) of the Spokane County Zoning Code indicates that one parking space is
required per 400 square feet or 27 spaces total. The site plan does not indicate the height of any existing or
proposed building but the Zoning Code limits the height of buildings in the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone to 65 feet.
The site plan appears to comply with the development standards of the proposed Heavy Industrial (I-3) zoning.
Staff Analvsis:
The proposal is located within the Industrial Comprehensive Plan Category and the Industrial Category is
intended to provide the opportunity for industrial development and reserve land for industrial purposes.
Moderate to high noise levels, odors and other nuisances are likely to be found in industrial areas. Some of the
relevant Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines are as follows.
Goal 7.1 states "the proper location of industries must be given due consideration to aid economic growth and
enhance the quality of life in Spokane County". Decision Guideline 7.1.2 states "buffering between proposed
and existing development should be required if it is determined that the proposal without buffering under
circumstances defined in 7.2.4 may impact existing development". Decision Guideline 7.1.4 states "before
industrial proposals can be approved, they must: a) conform to County water, sewer and utility plans or
policies; and •b) identify and take steps to resolve significant adverse impacts upon existing water, utility,
available and future energy resources and traffic systems; and •c) conform to County transportation plans and
policies; and •d) provide necessary buffering as noted in 7.2.1 through 7.2.4. Decision Guideline 7.1.5 states
"to encourage planned and efficient industrial areas within Spokane County: a) a development proposal
combining light and heavy industry should be done via a planned-unit development or industrial park; •b) all
industrial parks or planned unit developments should be compatible with planned or existing surrounding uses
conforming to the Industrial Category". Objective 7.2.a states "encourage balanced communities of
commercial, industrial and residential development in a compatible relationship". Decision Guideline 7.2.3
states "any requested buffering should be used to mitigate the anticipated negative visual, noise, psychological
and other impacts resulting from a proposed development". Objective: 7.3.c states "lighter, inoffensive industry
should be allowed to locate near residential areas if adequate-sized sites can be provided with proper
amenities. Appropriate performance standards should be designed to assure compatibility".
To summarize, the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan are supportive of the
proposal provided there is sufficient buffering from adjacent non-compatible uses. The existing use is very
orderly in outward appearance and noise and odors do not seem to be a problem.
The proposed Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone implements the majority of the Goals, Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Industrial Comprehensive Plan Category. The business exists on a portion of the subject
property and is a legal, non-conforming use. In order to expand the existing use, on the existing northern
parcel, the applicant could apply for a Conditional Use Permit or change the zoning. By changing the zoning of
both the northern and southern parcels, the applicant is able to expand to the southern parcel. There is no
existing Heavy Industrial (I-3) zoning in the immediate vicinity and approval of requested zoning coutd set a
precedent for similar actions. The proposed zone reclassification is linked to a specific site plan so uses other
than the proposed expansion of the existing electroplating business would need additional approvals prior to
being permitted.
Staff Recommendation:
(t is suggested that the Hearing Examiner determine that there is adequate buffering befinreen the proposed use
and existing and future uses permitted in the area. The Division of Building and Planning recommends
approval, as conditioned.
Attachments:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan
C. Zoning Map
D. Agency and Public Comments
E. Conditions of Approval
ZE-41-97
Staff Report - September 17, 1997 Hearing
4 of 4
ATTACHMENT A
VICINITY MAP
;mot JL J ` -
_ ~POpA.4;1,
1J , ^ `j F
~o4:R
nFF~~
i . ~yr * 1 ~ ~
- ~ `w J '
~ 'S ~ . .`ti
H ~ p V •
; J+t1
: :'''c.,~}•'. . ~ ~ ~ '
. ~ , ~~GJ ' ~ ~ , °R'
µON" rt
` ~
449
Z i•..~I h ~ / ~ ~ p;
-•,..LSP'OtfA.
n
~ , ~~3+~..~+~~ . ~ ~ ;c " , , ~
' ; . ' ~ ►
- KN°r ~ _ . ' • r^~
N ~ ~ ~ t0 ►a r,,,r,.~.~.}j- . .
L " ~ t ►
M ~
3 1, ~
~ v~ I t, ~
~r-- •~;p.`.:~ ~ 1 ~ ` ~ ~ ri ~ 1
CA
o W.
-t A~? tr-
.r c T Q r
~ ~ i :1 `
~
11 \V ~ 2 ~ ~
. ,
ATTACHMENT 6
SITE PLAN
I
raoxtr ,.rcnukro"
ICL ; I~
~I~ ~r r~,•..~i n:7, i!.i i ~ L
;1 4 v~ I u I 1 1 1•
'i7 I ~ i~....• •rr'1J,y~ Nl.l N~~ 7
, 1~ 111
. LL ~ I 4 , ~ 1''~~~~~' y' • ~
~ ~J ~ • ~ ~'u ',t~L~ 1 _ ~•Mo.~r«~~i..l~~~i~~....L I.1.w~yV: ~
i ~ , ~5 .
/ ~~...t..-.~.,r._ - 1,
. ~ ~Ie~La 1 ~:4✓ w~~~4` 1 • `J~~ ~y~ jYr..~,
~ • 1 ~W ~ ~ 1 • IJU ~ f ~.IlrY~d .~.w~~rSr~l(] -
~ ` ' ` .r~ • . : 'y'~ ~ `o. ~ „r~~ I r
•.~rfwl.a~~~~.~,.~M •.~~r1`awc~i:w~~e~o.r. nin~ s~rr
~ • Yl ^ ~ r ~i ~ ~..u ~ ~ . ~ r ?f a d.
~~in 1 114~w 1~~~W Vil e
v[I~r ~ ~ ,O ~lil W ~~mIVW ~ ~
. _ .t ...,,..ti ` w• _ ,1~..~,,..,~~.
•~~~f rw.nlu w~0♦ . R~rIAnN4+Y`IY~w~N rl~r w' 1
~M WiMlv~'/ ~l ' .Oty~/ 1 w~MYtN~M{MOf/V
..~iu~~. Z..: , ..Wi.b. i•
x L Rr ~ .R-~~- +1~N
~,T7• ~1 ~ r~ • i • M 0
p !^.'t.~.;:!~=~"1-;- ,y.. -~..r•--...a~' ~.r.~WnQR1! ~.L.~ ia~n~1.V~Jtmr~i ~
~~~I^ i ~ • • l1Y vu I~Y~P1M~ ~ I/J ~ I ' ~ t ,
~ •.J ~ Y!\`if~ {I.~~MY~• Y ♦~I/ 1 Y~wMh~OM h~0 ' J
T . ~ . . . ~~IrLy►~ J~r.•u~ ~Illlll~l~ ~j
I,~°/ 1 ~ 11t M4~0,.kLo M—# f.11., lNw4-.1 N
1 10~4~ IM~YI.Y
/ / .'V/ / 4'[~.~{i• .41• ►~LY~. Aw~/rl~rl~wlx~~ti~l.~~ ~~11 ~11~~( -
~ ~ \ ~ ~~~V / / ~ ~ 4W, f►/W.1~I.SiA.~ 1 •M~\~v-~~11~1 ~ 0 i
I ~ ,~~I~~ • ,'r ~=/,lu1M~~.1 ~ O
1l i ^I r~ ~ / •~~ua v, /o.
~ I - i I j/ ~ .n~aw■~* 1aIur ~
. ~ : li--
'I_~ r r„ i . ,~j ~ % ~ -tr ;
~ , : ~ ; ~ ` ~ii~~ ~ ' • % i , ~
~ + _ . . . . r.. o
1i• '
y ~ ~~t 1~ ~ ; ~ ,
~r-~
YIr,IIIII.Y_}dIV; U ►
, ..~.ry... v.q~rl~n • ~ U
t k~• _ ita~ . . u>~ . . . '1 'Y :
~ ` • •
~♦e*♦ ~ t~.ie f• t ~ ~ J S'
i:
~ ll~..~ -
. _ - - - . I„ ~ 44 ~ _ ~ " 11 r.
~..~v , w "C C~° e° r ' k ~ f I ~
7 trI
4 Plok Plan f-cECEIUED
0
XJu
N , SPOICA~1t COUN`~1~
aQni
{'~.ti . ~„`z~:."
r, nu . M 4.-rr • .1111 0 1 1997 ~ I, ~ ~ ~ ~ + p
(41~ IN M Y'~~ M(IY~~(1~114tR..rr~l~M.f ~I'"M.~1~.1 r~~.~. ' n
l
~.l `v~1f~h l,l•~ I~ ria ~ui +IWf , yl '
.~Z - N 21V
~.,s.« i~•~ ti~ r~rf ca'r ..u. ~u itta •k ...Iar.~ It n,
1'Iw/ N♦ F~al.~. lJnt~w. N.f '~~•iwl ir.~ I.f~.» I'~It~. Y•i
t..r. a
J+ G U
~ i ~1~~ ~u~~• u~♦ u 1l 1.-41.~ ~~r♦ ~.4t. 'S•, f•• . 1 ~i I
~ - .E ~ ~~I^'~I:IIM
' ,~,~:f•►•.~;,..~.., ~n~, ~IUI~InN ~r pUlL?INQ AI40 ('WVNING I k-4~--'Q
~ -~Pr"
f~1V
1, 1~' I N_ SIflItAlIE VFl{ EY t[CjlfYl
:.~.i -
~
ATTACHMENT C
ZONING MAP
~
Zon'ng M-ap
ZES"41--97
.
~
~
LW
. ~
.
. .
~ / ~ `ti
14
,
v.
.
.
' JnCASG
~
C~I ,r O
yo
.4° ~ ~~c• g
°1 T
{
.
Br~
.2
K N ~ .
NoN
~ ~.-1 ►''j ~ ~ I
do
~
2w
,ib
~
. ao
~
;
~ , .
~
09l111g1
ATTACHMENT D
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
I
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO Spokane County Planning Departmen ~ ~FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE August 26, 1997
PROJECT I-2 TO I-3 NOVATION FAC
FILE # ZE-0041-97 /
Hearing 09/17/1997 @ 1 30 #
Review Date @ #
Sponsor/Applicant RON KELLING
Section Townshlp Range 8-25-44
Planner LOUIS WEBSTER
Technical Review Date (06/19/1997 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained f rom the County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
5 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
CC Apolicant RON KELLING
Engineer/Surve,ror ffICHA£L PhILLIPS
i
Page 2
09/17/1997 06/19/1997
2E-0041-97
6 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
~
v
S. JKANE REGIONAL HEAL'I`H DIST.L _ LT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEA.LTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
DATE September 2, 1997
TO Louis Webster, Associate Planner, Spokane County Building and Planrung Division
FROM Donaid T Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT Proposed Zone Change ZE-41-97 (Kelling)
1 References
a) Map of subject, scale 1"= 20', by Kenneth Kroening, dated June 23, 1997, received by this office
August 21, 1997
b) Reconnaissance Geoloiiic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Ouadranizle Washineton and Idaho,
Allan B Griggs, 1966
c) Soil Survev, Snokane Countv Washlneton, Soil Conservation Service, U S D A, March, 1968
d) SDOkane Countv WashinQton Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service U S D A,
August, 1974
e) Snokane Countv Rules and Reiaulat2ons for Sewa2e Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995
f) Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, and 17
g) Map Spokane N E Quadrangle, U S G S, 1973, and Spokane N E, U S G S 1973
2 Findings
a) This prvject lles over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Modern
Electric Water Company Water supply wzll be a publ2c system
c) The project is inslde the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80 0418 adopted March 24, 1980 The topography and soils in
the area axe generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems The lot 1s not of
the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area east of Locust Road and south of Trent Avenue Local
drainageways are insignificant
s
r
e) Surface soils are class..... by the U S Soil Conservatfon Servic'_ as Gamson gravelly loam with 0% to
5% slopes They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight There is also possible contamination
of groundwater Tlus soil would be classified as a Type IV
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very large amounts of water Data from wells in the area referenced in sechon 1 f shows they are
from 59' to 234' deep and have static water levels varying from 40' to 106' below the surface The
Modern Electric Water Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent
3 Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health
d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project Use of an individual on-site sewage
disposal system shall not be authorized
4 Recommended Conditions of Approval
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited
c Director of Utilrties, Spokane County
c Sponsor RON KELLING
4114 E BROADWAY
SPOKANE WA 99202
FRED LEFRIEC
2616 N LOCUST RD
SPOKANE WA 99246
landuse Iv\ZE41 97(KELLING)PA
I
To LOUIS 1lVEBSTER, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning Design Review
From Spokane County Utilities
~
Date 6/23l97
Subject Condi#ions of Approval
Planning Action Number ZE 0041 97 Type of Action ZR Zone Change 12 to 13
Applicant Ron Kelling Legal Owner Fred LeFriec
41 14 E Broadway 2616 N Locust Rd
Spokane WA 99202 Spokane WA 99206
Sewer Service
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer
conneckion permit is required
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department under separate cover' only
those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and
facilities for review and approval
~ SS12F The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit
~
~ SS13A Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of the public sewer
connections and facilrties
SS15 Arrangements far payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer
connection permit
SS22 Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by the Water
Resources Section
Water Service Modern Electric
WS01 Any water service for this project shafl be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County as amended
_ • A
ATTACHMENT E
C4NDITIONS OF APPROVAL
q t
~ .
~
~
,
,,4.~ ~
, - ~ i ►
1
l, t
FINAL BUILDING PEEtMITS 7/10/97
FINALI2ED
SITE ADDRESS NAME & PROJCCT PRRCEL N FILE# MYLAR BY DATE C
FARR LN N 2616 ORO WHEAT WHSE-WHSE SPALDING 450E2 1835 B93098 CR 7/30/93
PA.RR S 210 PRING CORP/AA CONST-APT 72 QNIT 95202 0731 895079 H-50 DB 6/28/95
E'ARWELL E MEAD SCHOOL DIST-WHSE 36101 $93117 PL 9/12/95 YES
FARWELL E 1610 NORTHWOOD MEADOWS-ELDERELY CARE FAC ( P1688 36092 9027 B93177 CR 9/19/99
FARWELL E 2515 MEAD METHODIST CHUZCH-ADD CLASSROOM CHURCH 36094 0803 B99160 PL 10/10/99
FARWELL E 3801 SPO CO FIRE DIST #9-OFFICE BUILDING 36034 0225 897057 DB 5/7/97
FARWELL E 3801 FIRE STATION-DIST 09 ADD 36034 0225 B93093 CR 6/16/94
FELTS LN N 2707 6 2717 WAGSTAFF COMMERCIAL PK-OE'FICE WHSE R 6 C 45081 0814 B96015 DB 10/29/96
FLIGHT S 1601 U S WEST-SUB STATION 2530 B90088 SE 8/22/90
FLINT S 1519 BOEII3G-EXPANSION (SR2 W 9200) 2530 B91109 BT 3/19/92
FLINT S 1519 -ADD SUPPORT SER 210 X 131 2530 B90003 BT 3/18/92
FLORA N 2217 AFEORDABLE CUSTOM CABINETS-ADD 5512 892090 BT 7/21/93
FLORA N 2521 SPO CO- 9512 B70155 BM 3/29/89
FLORA N 25?1 SPO CO-STG HERBICIDE FAC 95121 9015 896011 DB 2/2/96
FLORA N 3019 DELLEN WOOD PRODUCTS-STORAGE 5507 B69067 JS 6/13/89
FLORA N 3019 DELLEN WOOD PRODCICTS-STORAGE BLDG - 5507 B91001 BT 2/12/92
FLORA N 3019 DELLEN WOOD-ADD STORAGE BLDG 55072 0322 893051 BT 6/29/93
FLORA N 3014 DELLEN-WHSE MFG 55072 B70170 JS 6/7/89
FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD PRODUC'IS-ADD WHSE 55072 0332 B94013 PL 6/6/99
FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD PRODUCTS-OPEN STORAGE 5507 B91033 BT 6/12/91
E'LORA N 3910 WAGSTAFF-INDUSTRIAL BLDG - FACTORY OFFICE 5506 B70094 GN 9/11/89
ELORA N 3910 WAGSTAFF INC-ADD PRODUCTION ROOM 55063 0173 B99132 EL 8/23/95 YES
FLORA N 4501 PUMP STATION/WATER BOOSTER-CONSOLIDATED IRR 95011 9036 B99099 RT 6/9/99
FORKER N 11019 FIRE STATION-DIST 09 ADD 4619 B92102 BT 9/12/93
E'ORKER N 11102 F'OOTHILLS COMM CHURCH-ADD ACTIVITY CTR PHAS 96119 9020 B96109 DB 6/10/96
FORKER N 11102 -OEFICE ACT/ED CENTER 4611 870063 GN 12/31/91 YES
FORKER N 11102 FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY-CHURCH 9611 B92128 BT 5/4/93
EOUR MOUND W 17217 SPO CO FIRE DIST 03-ADD / MEETING RM 1605 B92135 PL 10/29/94
FRANCIS E 1327 -CHG OF USE KRR KRAFT-PAINT AUTO BODY 3629 B92076 PL 9/12/95
FRANCIS E 1623 -STORAGE AUTO FRAME 3628 B89110 BM 11/22/89
FRANCIS E 1627 SWANSON AUTO BODY-ADD 3628 B91049 BT 7/18/91
FRANCIS E 1803 ZIEBART-AUTO DEALERSHIP 3628 B90053 BT 5/31/94
FRANCIS E 1907 -CHG OF USC GYMNASIUM TO OFL'ICE SPACE 3628 B90247 BT 7/30/91
FRANCIS E 1907 WALT WORTHY MINI STORAGE 700 UNITS 36283 1808 B99079 RT 7/1/94
FRANCIS E 1913 WORTHY-MINI STORAGC 3628 692063 RT 7/1/94
FRANCIS E 1925 -INTER REMODEL 6 ADD OFFICE SPACEUBTERUIR 3628 890298 BT 7/30/91
FRANCIS E 1925 WA ST DSHS-RELOCATE STORGE BLDG - WORTH 3628 B91096 BT 6/13/91
FRANCIS E 1927 WA STATE-OFFICE BLDG 3628 B90236 E-39 BT 7/30/91
FRANCIS E 2707 ED S AUTO BODY SHOP AL KLEEN-AUTO BODY SHOP 3628 891080 TM 11/20/92
FRANCIS C 2707 AL KEEN-ADD AUTO BODY SHOP- 3628 890087 BT 9/19/91
FRANCIS E 2707 ED S AUTO 80DY-ADD DETAIL SHOP / KCEN 36284 0538 B95097 KM 6/30/95
FRANCIS E 2720 -CAR PORT 3628 B70292 BM 11/17/89
FRANCIS E 2917 CAPSTONE-HOME IMPROVEMENT STORE 6 STG 36273 1907 B96060 J-38 DB 4/1/97
FRANCIS E 3813 -STORAGE MINI 3627 891039 JF 7/10/91
FRANCIS E 3813 HULLPAK MFG-PACKAGING MACHINES 3627 B92109 BT 2/3/93
FRANCIS E 3815 THOMAS WILSON-SIGN 3627 B70133 JS 2/21/89
FRANCIS E 3817 / 3811 ELJAY OIL-DIESEL FU6LING STATION 36274 9057 B99115 PL 10/29/99
FRANCIS E 3915 TOM TOMCZAK-SpEC OEFICE/WHSE A 36279 9059 B95039 KM 12/18/95
FRANCIS E 3915 AUTO REPRIR & RV STG-WAS AUTO AUCTION 36279 9059 B99166 PL 3/8/95 YES
FRANCIS E 9009 CASH HARDWARE-RETAIL JOHN DEERE 36274 9021 B96185 DB 11/13/96
FRANCIS W 1120 LES SCHWAB-TIRE CENTER (REMODELED BLDG) 36303 9017 B97073 DB 9/22/97
FRANCIS W 1212 INTCR REMODEL-RICE TIME EXPRESS 36303 9033 B93155 CR 12/7/93
eRArrcis w 1320 -SZGN 3630 870249 art 8/1/89
,
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF laiPPROVAL" ZONE
-
TO Spokane County Planning Departmen
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads ,
DATE August 26, 1997
PR()JECT I-2 TO I-3 NOVATION FAC
FILE # ZE-0041-97 /
Hearing 09/17/1997 @ 1 30
Review Date @ #
Sponsor/Applicant RON KELLING
Section Township Range 8-25-44
Planner LOUIS WEBSTER
Technical Review Date (06/19/1997 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building per=ait or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
5 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
CC Applicant RON KELLING
Engineer/Surveyor MICHAEL PHILLIPS
~
Page 2
09/17/1997 06/19/1997
ZE-0041-97
6 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer Al1 work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
Kirnba9A, Sandy
- - ~ -
From Hemmings Bill
Sent Monday August 25 1997 2 35 PM
To Webster Louis
Cc Harper Pat Franz Dean Kimball Sandy Engelhard Scott Pederson John
Subject ZE-41-97 - Ron Kelling
Importance High
8-25-97
I received the above referenced proJect application on August 2 1997 The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as
being Garrison Gravely Loam soils The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate Therefore since this is
an approved soil for stormwater disposal no concept drainage plan is required We have no information that says
there are any critical areas on this site
I conseder 4his proposal to be technicaliy complete
I recommend using the standard drainage condition
&&'W"M"ya
Page 1
CC
NOTICE O~ PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COiJNTY HEARING E R
TO All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOgJ ARE HEREBY Io10'I'IFgEI) THAT A PiJBI.gC gIEAItING WI]LL BE HEg..D ON THE
ILAIVID USE APPLYCATYOIV LIS'g`EY) BELOW, AS FOLILOWS
0
Appflncation File No ZE-41-97, Zone Reclassificahon from Light Industrial (I-2) to Heavy Industrial
(I-3) on approx 2 1 acres for those uses allowed wnthin the Heavy Industnal (I-3) zone
I-iearing Date and Tflme September 17, 1997 1 30 p m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Applicant Ron Kelling, 4114 E Broadway, Spokane, WA 99202, (509) 535-4688
Owner Fred LeFriec
Locahon Generally located east of and adjacent to Locust Road, approx 500 feet north of Montgomery
Avenue
Coenprehensive Plan Industnal
Zoning Designation Light Industnal (I-2)
Environffiental Deteraninahon A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the County Division
of Building and Planning, as the lead agency The official comment penod ends 9-15-97
Deadline for submitting SEPA Appeal [note only applies to adnunistrative appeals to the Hearing
Examiner, not to irutial applications such as rezones or preliminary plats]
Related Permits None
I)ivision of Buildtng & Plann'ng Staff Lou.is Webster, (509) 456-3675
HEARIIVG EXAMINER P1tOC'EI)URES
Hearang Process and Appeals The heariilg w111 be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the heanng The Heanng Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner s decision w111 be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Environmental appeals wnll follow the same procedural
route as the underlying achon All heanngs will be conducted in facilities wluch are accessible to
persons with physical disabilities
Inspectaon of File, Copies of I)ocuments A Staff Report vvill generally be ava.ilable for inspection
seven days before the heanng The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning, V Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a m and 4 p m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays
Copies of documents vvill be made available for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or
special needs, please call the Division at (509) 456-3675 Send wntten comments to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn (insert name of staff
person, and/or list file number for application) Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane,
WA, 99260-0245
l r
r
,
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
:7
QIVt610N OF 6UIlDlNG AND PLANNlNG
SPOKANE ENVFRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECT~.ON 11010.230 TI-I
RECEIV
SPOaGqNE UNTY
1 2 s f:
DIVISIO OF BUILpING A(VD PLqNNING
BY
sPOxar+E ExvtQOraEKVU oantNAMc
iUAC 197 11 960) Section 11 10 230(T)
E irornne taI Checkltst
F11e Ha
Aurpose of Chectltst
The $tate £nrfrormxntal Policr Act (SEPA) chaoter •I 21C RGY reQuires nll gorerrrx tal DgE C1@S to co sider the eirorAnencal irapects af a 0 OROSdI
before makrng +lecision5 An Enrironmerttal Imact Statertent (EIS) tmtst be preoar'ed fo+' ail prapCSS15 Mith probabtie significa t adverse impacts an
the Quatity of the enviramae t The purpose af enis cneckllst fs to a o ide i farnsae on to nelo yuu and the aqency identlfr fmpacts f ora you
propasal fand ta reduCe or avoid icrqacts from the OraDOSaI if ft can be done) and co hplp the agenCy decide rhetner an Et5 is requlred
1n5tructions fpr AppliCants
o This enrironmental checkiisi asks Yau ta 4escrtDe seue trsslc ifo+^mation aDaui your proDasal Governmental aqenties use this cneckl9st to aetermene
mhether the enriranaental impatts af your propasal are Signtilcant eq Iring preaaratio of a EIS Artsaer tht questaans h feflp aitn tne n+ost
PreCise fnfortaation krtwrn pr give the best desCtsDtto you Can
rou nuSC ansti2r eech questlon aCCUratelr and Carefullr tv the b25L Of rour knqaiedge 1n moSC CeYES you shuuid be ab1P to answer tne auesticni
tro+a your QeA7 oDServation5 or proleet plans bitAOUi the nCld Cd h C exoerts If yau realty do n0i kf10w the anst+er 0 if a p425C10n d0£S 110L a001Y
Co raur proaosal arlte do nct knaa or daes not apply Conrolete ansaers to [ht pumstlons ad may araid unneCessary delays later
Some questtons esk dDout governwantal regulattons sucn as zoninq SAarellne and landmark designetions Ansrer these questlans iP you ca If you
ha e probleas tne ga ernmentat age cies tan esslst ya+
The chrctlist questians avoly to all parts of rour v opasai even 1f yau olan to da the►a o er a pertod of ttme or on dilferenc oa cels o4 ta d
Attacri any additional fnfarmAtton that diil Cescribe rour propossl ar its envlrvnnz ial effects The agency [a rnttt+ you submlt this checklfsc may
ast rou ta e:platn rour ansmers, or proriCe addtttunei lnforznation reesoneDly related to deter*Mnlnq 1f Cnerc may Oe Signifttant adverse i++mact
USe af cheCk l!St for nCttOrO jBCt OroDOSa15
Cmvpleie this chetklrst for rtortOro)ect prOpasals Even though QulstlCns taay De ensvered 4ols not aaply
iN MDiT[OA cwviete the SIfPPLE?SENTAL SH£ET FOR 1104PAQJ£CT ALTIONS{Part 0)
For nonpro)ett act9ons the referentes 1n the Checkifst to the tiores prn,rect aooltcant artd D*boe ty or site snauid Dt ead as p aDCSaI
proooser aad affected geograpnic area resoec 1ve1r
A BAC1(GtOLRt4 1 ~ 1 1
1 'lmme of proDOSeE Drojrct 1f apDlicaole Im~ " o -L61& "-f~Gu~! ' .
~''c~~~~ . • qn...r- v r=
z Naoe of Applrtant -r-e-lo ?4 VVU~ lir,445.1
3 Ad4ress mnd phorse maa0er pf a001 iCant pr Contaci De Son
~ t Date [Aeck 1 ist preoarrd G! Z 111r
1,~A •
~`O~Ar~~i er-
4 Aqency requesting theck 11 st -pr
l
b Proposed tf+sinq or scqeaule {f cl d1 q vflas+ g if acpltcsole)
7 a Oo yau have anr pians for future additions exoansion ar further aCtirity rplated to or Cors+etted vith thts propcsat If yes txClain
-yy.r= t5-47t7 `14wsw
A~ '9n'X1ZU ~ ! c~. Boo St
h do you oan or hare o0ti0ns on lend neerDy o aC)acent to th1s praposal? lf pes explaln
8 llst any environzwntal informatton you knaY eoaii tnat has been prtpared ar n{ li be prrpart+d dtreRly related to LAiS prvpo5at
Aev 2/1/88 ~
c
9P0[A.'2 LQPIROM'EY"•AL ORDI9l1FC°
(1AC 197 11 960) 5 c! LL 10 230(1)
A BAL3,G30QRD ( t t 1 ued )
9 po you imw vhechet pptl clom p oding t gov rmental pP v 1 t the p p0441 dlt tly Ef t1 g Che p pe [r t v d bv yovr
Dr Do al L y sp 1 1
e
~ ~cl Jw)
10 LS c oy g roaa c ppr . 1 or pecsit• tluc vill be naeded tor yaur propo al l laiown
GautNe-rY fc.rPel. La(O& _T;'k.MNt t-r'
4
L1 Gt Dri f coaplece d crlpcion of ywr propoml ineluding the pVopoeed u e ad the oi ol the pro) ct a d site -hese ar er3!
que tioas LC r la chi checkli c chac k you to d erise e rc i aepocc t raur p po 1 Cou do oc aad t r yeac tho nov cs o tAls
p 4
Zo ~l~ G l~~ ~'Fi~oo~ Z Z'To To g7 Ps~b ~-~-r Oe~.l 17~1
Voviv vr0 4t 9 0' nizo' W44se, 'Tv sedm►T ~al or- EXtsT
141 65 ' V7e41-~~A4;Z-
i toc tioef of che propo al G1 utflclo t!n(onacloa [or a pacu n Co unA t c ecd tha pnetse lo tl n ot yout propo ed project Lntl dt E
cr t addr s an snd ecLio tovnaRlp and range tf lwove+ If o propoasl vould o c r o er e r ng of r a provtd t1 ranq or
Eauadact C th lc Pr iA 1 g 1 da criDtion ise plan •ttlnicr maD ed copogrephlc mp !f c a onably e ai2abl 1A11 you
ehould submlc pLaas r Quir d Er7 Ch genc7 you ce ttoc c aulred co dupltc c oap oe Aec il d plan ubotcted vith anr permic ppllc ci
r lat d t chl cha kll t
1- Zi - ~bt- 0~,13ro A~00 1~(O 67011lO5a4-
`Ozm
r ^
r ,
~ 1 T! ~f f ~i
1 Ooe tt+ pcopo d l0 11 viclln the AQul or Sertalclv Arm (ASA) '!r Ge eral Sev r 5 rvic Are '1v Pri ricy 5 ver S rvic A '1
Ctc f Spokan (Se Spolcaa C u cy ASA Owr1aY n %cLo ! r hwndar!
~ve"w3~1~ Gd(.4~T 1 fr
4
-0 ae corM.z-_n et AM u.vT
8 ~Vi&O .R`t.*4'J1L 3._"L°"
E luoclo or
Ag y li Only
1 EAP-t
a Gen t i descrlpcio o[ c4e l (etecl oa ) ILt rollias hi117 coeo L pae mwac ► ou
oCR [
f-l.AT
E T t L the eccope t lope on che ite appro U c pareant olopa) K1OP4g__
c fiit g n ral c7p o( soile c tound on ctie eite (for exaopl eisy mad gt 1 peec auct)
If you knov ctie clan itieatioo ot grieulcurol ootla opaci y thao nd n t oor pclxe [acsLnd ~
~
~ e 1 ~c,1 ~ t (~f ~
0- cy r (-W
Gc~ ~ ~
`J
d lkr th ce sur ace indieatiooo or 11 ton o[ nat Dl ooils ln t'+e lmwd1 ce vieinity 1f eo C,~S 0 tg-
d criba
~0 04C
}
SPOKRNE EttVIROtUMENTA`I ORDIN1UtCs
(LIAC 197 11 960) Sect ton 11 10 230(l)
8 ENVIROMENT11L ELEMENTS(COntinued)
E aluation Fo
Aqenty Use Only
e Descrlbe the puroose type end ao0roaimate quantittes ot any filltng or grading prooosed
I dicate source of f111 ,
f Couid erosion o a ur as s esult of clearing Construction or use If so generally describe
0
g ADout vnat percent of the sltt aill be tovereG vtth impervious surfates after project construc
tion (for e:armle asDhalt or buildings)'
30 ~
h ProDOSed measures to reauce o control erosion or otAer impacts to the eartA if anr
Z aa
a Yhat type of eniss+cns to the ai voutd result froa tne prooosal (i e dust autaaoolle ooors
inaustrial .ooE snoke) during constructlon ana dnen tne croject is comoleted' lf anr
qeneraliy CeSCriDe and give aooro imate cw ntttes tf tnwn
ai
Vatr~g 47,e~,-,~ is c.otAf.-L-Em-17 S C^PcA 2~PQeo,t~r~
eAiKT 5ov TM 1 t~~ ~.~ir~~~ cvAT TooTH v4s4L• 8t ~~1STAU-£D.
D Are tnere any off site sources of eeoissions or odor chat mar atfec, your Oro0osal If so
generaily describe
.
c P ooos n+eas es to eavice o c3 t o1 e0lsstons or otl~er tmpacLS to al 1f anr
~A
7 vATER
a Surface
!11 ts tnere any surface eater tioav on or in ne uoedlate vfcinity cf tne slte inclu4ing yeer
round and seesonai sLreares sattw ter lakes conas vettands) !f yes describe type ana
provide names If aooropriate state .nat stream or river tt flaus into
'K,V t4r.
(2) Hill tne Droje r recuire anr wrc over in or adjacent to (eithin QO feet) tt+e descrlbed
vaters If res pleese aescriEe ana at acti a eila0le pians
3
~ (lAC 197 11 960) Se ci 11 LO 230(1) SPORJINL CPQIROf4WfT4i 06DIHARQ.' c
S ettYlROt+lEYTAL ELDQ`T'S ( ti ued) E luacl F
Ag cq U Onl
(1) E tiaat th nw t E flll nd dr dg aet Tial tMC wuld De plaeed !n or r mored ir o the
u t c v c r o v cl nd nd tadiuc th reo t che lt tMt vould De [f ced indt c
th ou c t tlll met i 1
Of4 F-
(4) ytll th propoo 1 r Qulr riae vmter vtchdcaval or div c lona Glao a ral d rip-
cto p po nd p9ro tasc quantltl know►
(5) 3oe cM propo 1 1! vitA! IOP-Tmc tlood platn it o aoce Loucion on tRe tce plaa
l W
(S) Doe th pr poael inwl ay di char ! vaac mc rlal t curt cv e s Lt o
d acrib [h trpe of v t d ticlpac d w luoe ot di eherga
14 v Pec
b Gr und
(1) vill grovndv c r be tthdr ve or v1I1 r c r De discAarsed t groucdv c r G1v g nor I
d cr pcio purpo d ppro imoi Qucntit.e lt lmovn
IW7~`~+
) 0 c 1De w ec amc ri 1 cMt vill 0+ di clscg d loto cM groued troo pcie tank r otM r
moicacy vnec crmCUaac t c111[7 Deecrlbe tAe g nmt 1 tse o[ ChQ q tm cle nlmber o[
hou c Oe ev d(tt qpiieobl ) or tt+e OV'aptT oI per ons che oy cem(o) ro mecced to
erv
W or.1 is
Do cribe or lp ceo chor cea ttwo d igaod tor t1w disyoaol of oeoiiaty rmts
inoc lled for th pvepo of di eturgina flulda balov ch arauod ourlac (Sacludoe eyocesa u h
cho tor cl+e d! posol o( coce vi cer or drataose trm floor dteins) Do esiba the eype o[
y t m th mouec f satert 1 to Do dl po d ot cArougA cM 7 cav ud the typo o[ mc [lole
llk ly to be dl po ad ot (lacludina mc ri lo vnleh mo7 ec r Lha apacm imd.vrionilT chrougR
epill r r ulc f[ir figncing esivlci )
V.1~-~-VZ- - ?D eL.&MV--Ot7 To Za'8 '170A,,4e.!
A09AS fr62WPA 6-#4et7 V4
(L) Jtll my tfieolcal ( pee 11y orgauic solveace or p trol ua uola) 'x e[ocad lo bovs
gt und r und rgrouad otoraQs taokn It so vtut cTpno sod quanciclso ot aacarlala vill De
stor d
I N. ~ 57mq(QE. TA1-uCS " S MAI,.l.. AmDUN 1er -oF SO LYEKT
p R PqI wtT W1 t,L. gE (~O Cj%,<S tG ~ to~l LONTAIt~t7 A92¢A
C, + o tzfA OKLY 114 RtG-~ 1 tJA~I,,• SHIP-QiNC-1 ~a KTAt►S ~ S 41rcTIL.
p,~Tc~Ez~Y ~1S~p. IS ofz C-tA~.. Gvr.a.~~►t-~.~5 WirrioY,
Z ~ l~61 N- Ttrt'gtr ~
~ (VAC 197 1 960) S ti 11 10 30(1) 9POfJ1HC GM30'qlQV'Lq OBDIVAliCFo ~
8 CRVZRON2MRL11L tl u d)
lu cl F
11g ~ U Only
(S) uhac p c ci x ur will b c hsn to insu tt+at Lmka r Dlll oE ay hemle 1
c E o ed it will S lloved c pe col t c graundv c (chi Lnclud eea ur
c keep eAeml 1 w c ot di p 1 or tev d cribed ! 7b(2) od 3p(7)
C~31rL T~11f' L.~ 45!TOn Tj;;7 VQy LY I{A 6O~TA14,41r.~
~M(N-5 1 N GlOE N~~l- ~r PI C.l. li~i~-402Y AC*D R6Et-V+
M AX 1N' iLL "gS
.t.t tc. k. gfE P~~~S.~.p o -r- I''1 Y-ZY1'44 I-V ArVr-Nfyv ~'-tiC~'T a~►~T
c M r Punoff (I cludLng Y ro v <
a Oescrlb [h urce of run [(Lneluding coco v c T) nd aeCbd ot coll ctioe and Qi pooal
1 nr (lnclud aua citi ! knoK►) vh r will thl .mcer tlov Vill chl %oc r ilov leco
och r vst ro If o d ec ibe
bN S.0 e.
, - r
C,0►,nQ i1 C~- ► auk Lt ~
J1 1 ay chenieale De ocored handl d or uned on the ei[ ta • lou tlon vhora qill ot
1 s will dr i t ur c o gr undv c r r co tocm v t r di poml 7 cam diccbmning co
wr c oc grounAwt r
~-o ro-.
(J) C uld v t m c r 1 ec r grou d t urt c.at r• Ii o g n c lly d cribe
hlo"e
A P po d a u c duc or c cr 1 ur ground nd n,n [f v c r imp t tt cr (!f
cn propo ed ction li vttAi th Aauif r Senete! Araa se pacially clmr oo xqlmaciooa
1 ting c f liti coae raina 5 etioo 30(4) )b(S) aod 3.c(2) o( th! Re kl! e)
'Zo S \04 44T VM Go ^t'tJZ o%. 'gLrQ `p.
'~Y ~bK~~ ~oes~~Y eNr.,
..A.-s
r circl trpe of g c c fouod on tM ite
d c dvou cr aid r asoi pen cAer
v g cr d pi cher
hcus
Sr
7 c
op r gr 1
[ otl pls t ccall butt s up Oullcu h kunlc Db g tMt
.ac plant voc r 1111r lgr mil! ll oclec
~c , < <.pes of ~ < <lan 611 C-G+-:\--;P
Vf+ c d na amounc f eg caci will 'x rmo d oc 1t red
vyfx,p;, 4-
L at t wcened ot ndan6 red pec e lmovn to `x on oc e r c!u •!ce
Ki aoAC.
P D e nd caping uno oI nac1v pLanco oe other aoaour co pro rve or aRance wassution
1 1 f anr
12Sta
~o K~1 ~ Go~t1R-~
5
~ (uAC 197 11 960) Section il 10 230(1) SDOKA!'(E ENVIRONME'(TAt OROI?IAltCE' ~
8 ENYIROfWENT1IL ELETIENT'S (concinued) Evaluatton For
Agency Use Only
5 ANIMALS
a C1 Cle any Oirds a d animsls rhich Aave been observed on or near the slte or are knwn to be on r
or near the zlte
0ira1 hairlc neron eeyle Songb rds Other
-J~()t ~ ~n,~`
rronraals deer Dear elk Oeever other '03 Of~ c 6 X ~ ~
fisn bess salcuon trout herring shellflsh otAer MOr4 ff.
other L~
a D lfst any tl+reatened or endangered speties knoun to De on or neer the slte
c Is tne site °art of a mi9ration route If so exalaln
~j
d P ooosed eaeesures to Dreserve or enhance eildlffe 1f anr
5 EvERGr An0 vATURAL RESOURCES
a unat kinds of energp (electric aturel ges aood stove solar) ei11 pe used to meet tne
tne camoleted oroject s energ,r needs Oescribe enether 1t atll De useo for Aeatlrtq manufec
turinq etc
19 LE G4' t-+c; ~ c~ EtAZreAU L1Gl4-rte•4
C
ki Wouid yaur projett affect tne ootenclel use of soler energy Or sqjacent prooerties' If so
generalty descriCe
111v
c Vnet kinds of enerq,r conservation festures are included 1n the plens af tnls Orooosal Lfst
ocner provosce nrasures to reauce or control energp tnoacts tf enr
w&.s %4 &:;raTF.
t
7 ENVIROtYME11TAL NEALTH
a are CAere any en 1romental heeltl+ hezards fncluding excosure to toxic Cneee+cals risk of flre
and exptosion so+ll or Aazaraous raste tnec coula occur as a result oi tnls proposel7 If sc
describe
~'fRDGC.sS G N~EM~~,A.t,s PAZOL SToYC.E17 tI't'rNO-40
tQ ORS C76tL Goa1'r A~~liE.1Zs 4SE3;1 i
l
A1L G o N'TA,"ik== 45ToRAA-if- ~M0 GA:SS TA~ I~S W fL~ E
"(~u71~ P~~l~ TD LpK~p~M -ro (VP1~~v~1 ~E~L- ~l~ Gpp~ FIC~ S A'F~TY S~f~S„
(1) scribe sDecial enrrgency services teat mtqnt be reQuired
6
~ seoKAxe VnaoruMrru. oRDt'W¢ (
(WAC 197 11-960) Se cioa 11 10 230(1)
D C`RIROlQQTLAL LISKEWS ( onCi uad)
L luoti F r
n r u o~y
Ag
ecrvtaor+ra ru. ~At~ (coocio~a) (2) Propo d me u c r duc r ncr 1 a+riro-ncal honlch hnwrdo if ooy
10f~1
~
° b Vota
(1) t►hat cypeo oi olo slot lo th araa vhieA may !t cc ywr projoec (Eoc asenpla trattie
qulpment opecscion ochar S.,
~TtZ I C~ I u t& Y1c ~ ~ S ~.,~.~i-•~ ~,l ,1
(2) Vhnc cypae nd 1 1 t nol vould ba craacad by ot amocieted vlth tl+n projoct o 0
ho t-c cm or loesg-c ru pa 1 (f r :ampl tr ftic c emtruccion op racion ocMr) Iadlc c
vhnc Aour noloe vould c m lcoo che oica
~~~T -r~R~ GvNST A~o~~S w~ LI~T~v
~ G ~Qt~ t+Pt~'1~ ^1 T 1 A~l oa4 T ~-u '~r I~~ . ~ "1'0 ~
(7) Pr poocd osa ure c r d c or c ncrol noto imp ec it 407'
~k v &A e-
8 ta"D AND SHORELI"E USE
v1+ t 1 th curr ac use of c'u ice and &djacant propacti
Z*F:1 10
b Ile tha aic been u ed toc gri ult r II s deacribe
AO
c Oe criDc nr cructur • cM it . 1
11L
d vtll anr etnu[urae Da desoliahad It eo vAic1
kd" IL
Y`►oc le ch curr ac nins ela i ic ci ! cf+a oic
f Vhac 1 ch cu[ronc empr l+onoi pL d igmcioo o[ cM ic ~ !
~ ~.~-~~~j Cc
g IL ppllcable vAnt lo cAo curr nt hor llne oaac r progrm do ignacioo ot cho aite
IQ lN
A Ha o7 parc o( Che !t Daea classi ted ao n aviromancally oaaolciva raa tt o
pecify
MoP49
i ApproxLaetely Aov aaa7r peoPl vould r id or vock !n Chm ccopleced peoj et
z-94-
7
~ (VAC 197 11-960) Sectioo 11 10 230(1) 3TORARL t.9VT3D1@MWLL OBDI2lAAEZ ~
D LRVIROtiTd2RAL CL.DMMRS (tooclnmd)
luacio P
Ag ncy Uoe Oaly
7 ADPro Saotely Rov aa y peopl vould cM compl c d proJ ct dleplec ~
k Propo d om uc to oold c r duc dl pla o nc lapeet it aay
N/A
. 1 Pr po d aa u co n ura eM propo al lo compaclblo vith OxSoting acd pro}occ d Land umeo eod
pI n 1t oy
eo~-;eoLt.%:vP 9Y SpowAMc
9 KOUSIVG
n Appro im c ly hov mny uaico vould De peovided it ooy Iodic c rhocM c ltlglY nlddle- or
lortacome houoing
• ~
D Appro:lmaCely hov aunr uniC lt oT vovld be lialmted! Iadlcac vhetMr h1gA- niddlr or
lorlnc o Ro ing
qIN
c Pr po eA am ur o[o reduc or eoncr 1 houeiefs lap ec• iL aa~
~ /A,
10 AES-IIV"ICS
V1+ c 1• ch c 11 c hatght ot n7 propo ed ocnu[ura(o) aoc loeludior a tuaasa Yl+at ts ttuo
Pci cip 1 sc rlor Euildiaq 2oc rlal(o) propo ed
02S4 ` 'T'o -00OO~ I MeTils-
Cvc..o 4fOv r~ 5~ vr•,~~
b V1► c vt v!o tM laaadlet icioity vould be lt e d ot osottuct d
NIQ4F,
c Ps po ed ma ur c reduee or conc=ol aeoct+acic Leaeece 1f aay
A,1665.-r NeT t cr G+-teqFZACT" Calr- o FS
~
u ucx- tivo ci.Ana
Jhac c79• of light or g18r vill tho pcopoml pcoduce Jf+oc tlma [ duy wuld ic minly occur
ON StTe trl G~!►~'T"l i~1C~ "YS149Il.t7#C, A-S
P1ctz GOcm
b C uld lighc or 61ar troo cM ilnieded peojecc bo e mlocy Aasard or tatarior vics lawt
c Vhec e:isciog t - !ta oweeoo ot ligAt or Slaro my eff ec yaur pcoposaA
d Propooad seenurao co ccduco oe eoacrol llgnc aod alsco lmpacto !f aay
~~.1 l..~IPI ~ 4
'9Y S Po dc,A.o.4M, co~ ~-r Y
a
~ (VAC 197 11-960) Saetio 11 10 270(1) SAOLAi+L L'li7IR04lZ4TAL ORDIlWw I
~
8 IIRIxORMElRAL CfffiQ.Yi4 (eoocl vad)
e 1 cl For
12 RECREASION Age cy U Only
Ylfct de igMC d d!al rmcl reatioosl pportunlti t 1 che laedi c vi inity
!-~~l.T b~l G L~.66
b Yould tho pcopoeod proj ec diaplac ny =i cing ceccastioanl uaaa it so daxriEe
f~ort
.
e Propo od aaa ucao to reduee or eoncroi impaece on raeteetioo locludiaa cccraailooal opporsua!-
tion t Da pcovidad by cM pco3eet o[ appliwot i[ ny
l ~~Q~'l
}
13 NIS"ORIC AlfD C4L-TlRAL PRPSERVA-LON
e Aea tAers ny plac e or objecce liscad o0 0r propo ed toc oocioool taco of loenl prooone-
cioa cagiacaeo iuwwn to ba an ot ooxt to cM oito Lf w geo tsl17 deeetlba
14DoAic
0 Geesrally daocriDa cy 1 edmorto or evtdane ot ht cor2e rehafological ocloncitlc r culcur 1
tmporcaaee Imwe t ba o or nsss to c2►o ic
t,6 A ~
c PTOposad oaaour o to r duca or e ntrol lmpactn lf ol
-b~l ooA 0-
li -FAtiSYOR ATION
a Identltp Dusllc troeto nd AlgMaya oanias c!►e atc aad d ocTibe proposed acceoo to t1+e
:1 ciag creat a7 taa St+ov-o olc ploos tf ey
_1!~2ff st-r~ ",aA ^ 1!5;TZ9P-r
LOGt.d *T 19t7 S-t-t7la T-- W-0 Ai'C ~ Tp vJ~T
b to li curr nclr crred S7r pu01i c mic L[ eo whac i he vv asa.s dlrsace co Chs
om[eoc c[emit ecop?
c Dov mam parir.inQ opneao vould tdo eooplotad ptoyoet Aaro1 Bov mny aould cho propct oliaiooeo
t,,CW
O ~L ~ a~tlo.d~T~t~
d V111 iha propoml raQulca aT onv sasda oc acsmts ot 18psawvr,mnco [o araiocing rmd or ocrmte
noc laeluding drivvva7,ot If oo `oaerally d eeriEo (lodiceto vdoehor puplie or pcivato)
~m r-
a dill tM projeeL u" (oc occur la tbo lomediece eieloiCy o[) mator eall or eic CtaoopoKat3,oe
If so geanrslly doatsibo
ki O&be
9
` (WAG 197 11 960) 5•ccio 11 10 230(1) SPORA23L II1VIY444l00RMI. 08DL56ti¢ C
8 @q7IROKKEN'.dl. LL.."~ (c aci vmd) Cv luecioe For
Agcocy 0 a Only
~
t Aov mn? whitulor CTlp par dar vould Da gocecoced Dy CM tomplated pcoj K II lmovn
1 dicat vhao vmk vould occuc
L-1
g Propo ed oe ouro to reduea or eontrol cron pOrtatlOA i8peete it ao7 011A 7
0
LW
15 PU9LIC SERYiCYS
J uld cAo pco) cc r ulc ie an locrmead oeod toc public ente e(tot esamplo [ir proc ecioo
potle prot etlon h alch caca sehools oehor)1 Ii eo gon rally dsoerlba
~i~ ~ 'Pt~~•f G.~ ~~de GGT10'~ ,
~
D Propo d nu urao co redueo or coac[ol dir ct lapaeee an puDlle aar►leeo i ao7
USs,JG-% e?CtST' r-1ev, t~ Y E~~Aa•lY' S
ie t tt -I 5
Cirele ucilici curr clr Llsbl ac the ate t ectieit7 oacasal gao a cet eaEu
ocher
oervien c 1 phon nitae7 o wr oapei~or eao
rc.~c.-r
b Dexrle the uciliclao tMt eca pr pooed tor tfe peojaec CM utlll[7 providieg tha a nice and
the neral onaccucclon eciviei o oe ct+o aico or lo cho inmadioco vlelnity wAleA adgAc sa
eed d
C SIGNA'IIRL
I eh und ign d evm nd tRa p ewale7 f paejury ehat Che Co+o e poasa mdo tevthtully eod eo t!r Da t t er kawLadg L al
und fecaad chnt Rovld tlvota be anr vi11fu1 aleTepteeantscion ot villlul lott oi tull dloelosurf oo mY porC Clfo a@n my vlthdtav uar
dec rminatioe ot om igaitie oe tM c tt adgAt l w lo r 11 oe upoo thi tee kll t
D t 7` ~Ll., l~lG ~~O V~.T ~ G
Propowot ~d~ ~ .
/ - (Y1 mo Prlnt ot iypa)
Propane c Addrom ` ~ ~ ~ 6 revXW7WA-.r
CSigne u ) \
535 ~ S Po Wa 99 z o z
Phon
Pr oo m9i Lin& coR L-L oet. t17
o ~
Ptton y07 ' 535 ^4-60~
Poe srArt ose onT
Scat[ nemb r(o) raviaKog chackliec L4.. 8a a o0 0 otaff revlov o[ tf+e ovironmental elwetllot aed othar paKinaac lnlocssefon cho «al!
A Concludoo that taaro ro ao probopl sisoifieeac sdvorno lmpoe=o sad cueasaoalo a docotsioacioo o[ nomigallleeoea
B Contludae ehat Qrobobl alEaiiie ae adw[o narttonzaaeal Sapaee do sxiae tor tAo eurt'aat psapooal ad taeoeomde s mitigatad doe e-
aioncloa of oasignitLe ne vitb eoodiciooo
C Cooclud o tlLC ct+ars acn prosebla aignilicaac sdwts• oavtrnmaassi Ss9acts eod caeamoods a dotmeslmtion ot aignifleaaeo
YILIPC m - 173 00
10
0
IDETERIVIINATIOIV OF
IVONSIGNgFICANCE - "DN5„
SPOKANE COUNTY I)IVgSION OF BUILDIgNG AND PLA,NNING
RESPONSIBLE OFFHCIAL, JA1VES L 1VANS0N, I)IRECTOR
VVAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FEI,E NUIVIBER(S) ZE-41-97
DESCRIPTIOIV OF PROPOSAL Zone Reclassification from Light Industnal (I-2) to Heavy
Industnal (I-3) on approxunately 2 1 acres for those uses allowed within the Heavy Industrial (I-
3) zone
APPY.ICANT Ron Kelling
4114 E Broadway
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 535 4688
OWNER Fred LeFriec
2616 N Locust Road
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 922-1912
LOCATION OF PIZOPOSAI, Generally located east of and adjacent to Locust Road,
approximately 500 feet north of Montgomery Avenue in the NW '/4 of Section 8, Township 25 N, Range
44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
LEAY) AGE1vCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
I)ETE1tNIINATI0N The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable sigruficant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file vvith the lead agency This
uiformation is available to the public on request
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below) C'omments regarding this I)NS must be
submitted no later thaa 4 00 p m, September 15,1997, if they are sntended to alter tbe
I)NS All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below
By Louis Webster, AICP Title Associate Planner
Phone (509) 456-3675
Address Spokane County Division of Building and Planrung (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
I)ATE ISSiJEI) ' ~Q,2, 1997 SIGNA'I'URE
OOMv1IIVIS REGARD G IIWIRONIlV1IIV'TAL OONCERNS ARE WELOOME AT "IHE H[EARING
APPEAL OF THl[S DETERIVUIVATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendaz days after the
signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and the
appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Division of
Building and Planrung to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2 Spokane County Division of Engineenng, Pat Harper
3 Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
4 Spokane Regional Health Distnct, Steve Holderby
5 Spokane County Au Pollution Control Authority
6 Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair, Steve Horobiowsla
7 Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley
8 Spokane County Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell
9 Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles
10 Spokane Transit Authonty, Chnstine Fueston
11 WA State Department of Transportation, Mark Rowher
12 Long Range Planrung Division, John Mercer
13 Fire Protection Distnct No 1
14 West Valley School Distnct No 363
15 Modern Electnc Water Distnct
~ N
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZO1~E R~~~~~~~FICATAON APPLJCA1 ION
~ ntt,ElVED
PA~tZ' I q'~ SPOKAIVE GOU(VTY
> >
~
A GErdEYtAL INFOItiViATION,
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE 'e0' I-J VrzL-01447 ONgirINOESUILDIN ANO Pl.ANNING
~
41(4 ~ftO~t~~A. BY
MAILINGADDRESS ~
CITY '5190W-A" ST? TE WA ZIP
PHONE J535`4'64S8 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT YS NOT OWNER, INCY.UDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT T4 SERVE AS R]EPRE3ENTATIVE
LEGAL OWNER S NAME LF, FM1FG PHONE 9 Z Z-~
MAILING ADDR.ESS ~ to L dt tA`~lr rZC7'
CITY STATE • ZIP "Z A4°
-A~ , q 2 d Q~o ~
rROJECTiPROrOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft)
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTRCLLED (acres or sq ft )
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECf/PROPOSAL ~~~1Z" r5Z9 ~ 9 0°'50
ASSESSOR PARCEL # S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ~ ~61to LOG ue..'IrT
EXJSTiNG ZONE CLASSiFiCATiON(S) (nATE EsTAac jsxED) I- ~
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Orf'IGEj
PROPOSED ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY ~ ~X2M6;r1Z1 A6 L''
SCHOOL DISTRICT WF-s'r vA+-t-f: `+r
FIRE DISTRICT ~
WATER PURVEYOR ~ OrW- V. 11*9
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single fanuly dwellings Duplexes MultifarYUly dwellings
Manufactured homes Bu-ciness Industrial *4 Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIWOLVING THIS PROPERTY WOWE
I3 LEGAIL/ZONE RECLASSITICATION INFOitIliiATION
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL LdrS Z ~ s 6s;°Sep
SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP RANGE 44 C-WM
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Vvp•
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD Z79A
I,
1
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL K YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Mclt-A"~~~ MIS V_--f Ta -5d~-r" OfF 09 L ArtVvr
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
Le-r-s Z *,S► f-2.,.sr.
EXISTING ZONE(S) TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) ~
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION STAMPhD BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW
. '
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
~~re-
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE IS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? -raar~ ~ctst'. ~ ~AG,~ oF -rHt~ ~ac~~~-rY~~~~T~•~h
4
f ~{~LL~"S6v PctaG~s~o~tr~~ WAt An1 /~►~c.vw1E~ ~a~~~~ ~ e,► -t~1~ ~i~~v~~~~
'F~s9C RiG-m17 T~6lCM VT u✓AS teS u G~
0*1 ~vwpf Z4-, 09o rro~vW~..l~ A14 ,NZr9vTQA0Y Rt_A*1t~F_T ~~ZohJ~ 1t.1 1991
vF 'rti1iS ,%e~e^ -ru 1- 1 604T I+4P (I Zj Lj-1E u SAGrc 1S wow "Or TTl"~E'ztwrT`f r p
WHAfi IMPACT WI_ L,i. THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? V'`4 DM It WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? '~~c~~►~ sT~ ~"w-AvY
Ati.%•ovdS Te4@ TcX 1~T
L.1 S~q~ } AN~7 1 S G~v1S~ STA*4T W~TH Tl•l~c+ 'r=rzAApp -'"+415, Aou6ik T0W4,&wp-
L 1 C-7HT AftAV Y 1~1 ~ t.l ST6Z.1 ~e l. FPt~ 1 L.1 T 1 ES .
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIG ATE YOUR PROPOSAL S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? '~~rAe
.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PAItT 11
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITI'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPOR.ATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT
FIRE MARSHALLlFIRE DYSTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~
B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (eM) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES
C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NUT DEFINITIVE AND WILL BE DETE1tMINED AT BUTLDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME
D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE
f~ /rla~~ s~tS ~ 7
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURFJI'I CE DATE
VVATER PURVEYOR j~
M
A SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW -c~ Zg •~5~
REQUIREMENTS ( (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE
II REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS .
~
q"'vL
~
WATER DISTRICT 4~L 4siTURE/TITLE.- A E
COUNTY ENGINFER ~Co ~
A PRELIMINAR%' DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FnR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE B DISCUSSED WITH l~E I T '
A COMME S s
~
2 K- q I SIGNATURE I E DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PItELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEII PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NUT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS
A COMMENTS Td G~74/,t/7-''
" 5 19-~~
SIGNATU ITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT F'ttb~ c HZU 2 p4 0!-
A PRELIlViINARY DISCUS ION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUiREMENTS FoR
SUBMITTAL 4F THI;7z (HAVE) (HAV T) BEEN SATISFIED
A COMMENTS OSIGNA T URF.rT E
SEWER PURVEXOR
J~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE .4ND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
ROF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT
A COMMENTS
.
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PAit'T III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATTON
aras~
I T NSED LAND SURVEY H E COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
RE 1~S D MAP AND WR LEG DESCRIPTION
DATE e~l c S C~ r7
PHONE 9
-XF DATE g/9r-1"1 ZIP
~
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER 4F AUTHORIZATION)
I THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE AC1'ION OR IF NOT THE OWNER ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF
r .
NAME 1 n,~-'~ n~£c~ DATE S~ 4i
ADDRESS ,LDcm Sa Wj -D PHONE 12-2 - t~)
2-0ZIP ~19 ~-v (I--,
SIGNA"1`UI*~A~PLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE DATE
/
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED A14D SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
~ 1991F, BY
Ld-jnn ~0~~ ~ ~i
00~ ~a h Joy Lynn Walker
d ~ 4tagPubl
0 ic and for the State of Washington
PUDLO st- Resid,ng ac Spokane, WashinRton
0
My appoinqnent expires July 01, 1998
PART v
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DMSION OF BLJILDING AND PLANNIlNG)
DATE SUBMITTED FILE #
~ -
DATE ACCEPTED BY L GJ
TOTAL FEES ~T 'a. a -4""I . 0 Q RECEIPT # ~~'I~~
t
~
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
fC~`1\GJL1~~iER'S CO1~JLYlTIO1~5 OF t`~iPROVL~Y199 lYR-PE~L'~T►7
L
. ~ . .
~O S okane Coun - ^Buig g P and P1 - De artment:
P tY -
FROM Division of Enguieering & Roads
DATE June 19, 1997
PROJECT I-2 'I'O I-3NOVATI0N FAC
FILE # ZE-0041-97 / )
Heanng Date @ #
Revlew Date
~
Sponsor/Apphcant RON KELLING
Section Townslup Range 8-25-44
Planner LOUIS WEBSTER
Design/Review Date (06/19/1997 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Enguieeruig Department has reviewed the above referenced apphcation The followulg
"Conditions of Approval" are subnutted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
'Fechmical Review Meefing
Prior to reDease of a buddmg permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
. drainage and access plans
~
3 aDiDlicant shall submit for approval by_-t4i!,,111111111111~- okane County Engineer
and the county Hea.l-j)i'strict a detailed combined on-site
sewage s'Crn plan and surface wa isposal plan for the entire
p'L- or portion thereof if the development is tihasrffd____1,
~
4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
. arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
5 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
- construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
CC Applicant RON KELLING
Engineer/Surveyor MICHAEL PHILLIPS
.
S ~
~
Page 2
06/19/1997
ZE-0041-97
6 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
. resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
7 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All
work within the public road right of way is sub]ect to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer
~
Y
1
♦
&Cirnba01, Sandy
From Hemmings Bill
Sent Thursday June 19 1997 11 02 AM
To Pederson John
Cc Harper Pat Franz Dean Kimball Sandy Engelhard Scott
Subject ZE-4197
Importance High
6-19-97
I received the above referenced proJect application on May 29 1997 The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as
being Garrison Gravely Loam soils The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate Therefore since this is
an approved soil for stormwater disposal no concept drainage plan is required We have no information that says
there are any critical areas on this site
mg"McKya
Page 1
PAGE 1 s 09 41 18 02 JUN 1997
Road# Raad Names MPost Reference Descriptia Road Log Info
02575 LOCUST RD (START) 00 000 SPRAGUE AV U 19 PAVED 18
LOCUST RD 00 120 MAIN AV (END) U 19 PAVED 18
00 180 NIX4N AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
00 250 VALLEYWAY AV U 19 PAVED 2{]
00 370 ALKI AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
00 500 BROADWAY AV U 19 PAVED 20
00 620 CATALDQ AV (END) U 19 PAVED 20
00 750 B04NE AV U 19 PAVED 20
00 860 SINTO AV U 19 PAVED 20
01 000 MISSION AV LT 19 PAVED 20
LOCUST RD {END} Ol 160 NORA AV (START) U 19 PAVED 20
02576 LOCUST RD (START) 00 000 SOUTH END Ta SHANNON U 19 PAVED 20
LOCUST RD 00 090 SHANNON AV (START) U 19 PAVED 20
00 270 MONTGOMERY AV U 19 GRAVEL 24
LOCUST RD (END ) 00 420 NORTH END C7F ROAD
02636 LOCUST RD (START) 00 000 44TH AV U 19 PAVED 35
LOCUST RD 00 090 43RD AV (START) U 19 PAVED 36
L4CUST RD ( END ) 00 120 I`dORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
02577 LOCUST RD (START) 00 000 MARING4 DR U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
LOCUST RD (END) 00 400 UPRIVER DR U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
4 Records Processed
IL
RECEIVED
Ma r
►
co!b-todrineetir
S P O K A N E O U N i l
BUILDING AND PI.ANNINC; • A DNISION OP THE PUDLIC WORKti OG1';~ I. I ti11 ~~1
1AMrL~ I.. 1IAn'41N C.f3.( 1IF: IOR:1N 1)11 N'l
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engin<<:,i!'~. 1
Jim Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities
Steve Holderby, Spokane Regional Health Distri` 7.
Wyn Birkentlial, Spokane Coumty Steve Worley, Stormwater Utility
Bill I-Iemmings, Development EM,i11,iccs
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transpoi-t~it ion Cwinci l
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Autli(~ii1,
Susan Winchell, Boimdary Review I',
West Valley Sch~~o1 Di.stnct \'o.
Fire District No. 1
Modern Electric %%'aicr
rROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE: May 29, 1997
RE: ZE-41-97; Zone Reclassification from Light Indtistrial (I-2) to Heavy
Industrial (I-3)
TrCHNICAL RFV1EW MEETING
JUNE 19, 1997 AT 1:15
llIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1'' FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
Please review the above application and use the attached APPL[CAT10N ACCEPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FURM for your comments. The Division of Building and
Planning encourages yoLir presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative hzve
been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments
on the attached form to Louis Webster for the meeting. Tlle attaclled APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN RCVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meetinLl
and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to thc
meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any qiiestions about the applicatiol1,
please contact Louis Webster of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-3675.
NOTE: The Division of I3uilding & Planning will now be circulating comments for SEPA
at ttie time of technical review. This will be the ojrly time you will be able to
cotnnacnt rE~~~;Ir•rlivig tl~e '-,I1'A fo>r fhis project.
c: lZun kc:lling, 4114 E. 13roaclway, 5pol:ane, Vv'A. 9920 Fred LeFriec, 2616 N. Locust IZoad, Srokane, WA. 992()(,
1026 WGST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINCT(v' 'PHorvr:: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (501)) 4S0 -47n ;
TDD: (509) 324-3166
T 'it C L
Design Review for June 19, 1997 at 1 15 p m
ZE-41-97, Zone Reclassification from Light Industrial (I-2) to Heavy
Industrial (I-3)
Generally located east of and adjacent to Locust Road approximately 500
feet north of Montgomery Avenue in the NW '/4 of Section 8, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM Spolcane County, Washington
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Industrial and within the Priority Sewer
Service Area (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone Reclassification from Light Industrial
(I-2) to Heavy Industrial (I-3) on approximately 2 11 acres for those uses
allowed within the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone
PARCEL NUMBERS 45082 1829
SITE SIZE Approximately 2 11 acres
APPLICANT Ron Kelling
4114 E Broadway
Spolcane, WA 99202
(509) 535-4688
OWNER Fred LeFriec
2616 N Locust Road
Spolcane, WA 99206
(509) 922-1912
ASSIGNED PLANNER Louis Webster
i
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING ANY) PLANNING
RECLASS1FICATIOl'V APPLICAJEL IOl'tl
ritL.EIVED
Pfa~1 d q'~ V1 MKANE VVUN• f
r' 1 ~ 1~~~
A GEI'~TI~AL INVOItNiA''IONa f i P1AME OF APPI.ICANT/REPRESENTATIVE VD 04 kvrz L-L t ki C7 ANp p
I.MNlNG
MAILING ADDRESS BY
CITY J5F?014A-" ~ STA TC WA ZIP ~ ~ 7z>7-
PHUNE 53 'Jr° 4"699 (work) (tiome)
IF APPI.ICAIVT IS NOT fJWNEIt, INCI.UDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTi30RIZATION
T+OR APPLICANT T(J SERVE AS REPRE~ENTATIVE
LEGAL OWNER S NAME PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS Q [Z(7•
CITY ~ ~Nt-AE~ STATE Wd'' ZIP ~ Z PROJECI'/PROP(]SAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 5.2! ? 9 G, 05 V~-
ADJACENT AREA OWNED QR CONTRCLLED (acres or sq ft )
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF pROJEC'f/PROPQSAL 49701Z° MZ9 ~ `°-50
ASSESSC)R PARCEL # S UF ADJACENT AREA OWIVED OR CQNTROLLED tAG
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ~ ~61 to LDG lBS'4' t7.~
EXISTING ZUNE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATC ESTA13L1SIICD)
EXISTIIVG USE OF PROPERTY 0'91 G~~ Sl4t9j:P ~ V1~14,5~.
PROPOSED ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHQOL DISTItTCT V.CCST V4.L-~~1{ _
FIRE DISTRIC"T
WATER PURVEYOR ~ ~~FV-Kt
PROPQSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily ciwellings
Manufactured hames Buciness Industrial V4 Mixed Use
Other ( ) Describe
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTTONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY
B LEGA~~~ONr RrCLASSYFICATiON gNFORMATION.
LQCATION OF PRQP(?SAL L 0r~ Z 4 s S.W. i ~'-y ° cp
SECTION S T+()WNSHIP Z S4 1tANGE 4r 4 C- W H
NAME OF PUnLIC R4AD(S) PROVIDINri ACCESS L- o°C usv IZP,'
WIDTH OF YROPER'TY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD Z79
e
.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL 02 PLANNED ARTEItIAL 00 YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS MeVM'r600ME:V-*l' Tai 50U'P " OfiF Dom I.AtUs"r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
L9 -rs Z S -Isco
TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_
EXISTING ZONE(S)
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPhD BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW L.o'Y°S ZA 15, ~ S1~" 15 - 3 (v
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY V`JHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT')
~'c- vvr- esc- 1~4 Tevc,
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OI' THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE ThIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED9 TKe S}cost'. v=acst, rT Y~~-~aT ~
4
f~~LA.T~l7 ~'t~G~S5e1~Cr~~ WAt ~nl A~.c.vvAE1T u~v1E~~ ~~1 T11~ F'ml9V~oa.-A.
Ql&yfRlL'TVw 1&4t7 17W-) Z04lc V414E" 'CV41E OQC-t SL-VpLn lV'6Wo►4%r u/AS 1c..SUGq=p
ON S'GVPT Z 4, t 99 o rro~.a. vw~••t ~ Ae.t aZl2zo•Je-''Io-4 19 91
vzF'Tti1is AwxeA Tu I- t 6,1AT IAIP (t Z) r_j°^1E Te~ Ue.*Acm.E. la-P "ow "ot- T~3Zt^rY`Tmt:~p
WHAT IMPACT WILhL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES9 ~N M
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION~ ~&►e. lCSQLl*sTE t;:w AMAvy
Oeqr-7L1ST21 Al. (I 3) Zvhls ^A.L.oW S'T"@ Ex1 ST 5~vfZ1►1 A L~.Y A~- ~wEd
L1 S. A-Cqe~ f AA1c> I s GvNS~ STA*gT W iT" T"e 'PCzrzw84? #94 YowA=p
LIG7HT ~ µEqvy %NvpL.1 ST21~1. F^Gt L.ITI ES .
WHAT MEASU2ES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIG ATE YOUR PROPOSAL S IMPACT ON
SUItROLJNDING LAND USE7 '910Q•1e
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PAItT II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELTMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANIVING DEPARTMENT
` FIRC MARSHALL/CIRE DISTRICT '
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIItE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~
B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (tN9M) (HaVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES
C RECOMMENDED FIItE FLOW t8C7 OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE ANQ WILL BE DETEIUvIINED AT BUILDING PCRMIT
APPLICATION TIME
D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE
ScFPOra/ Ct"~- d~2,w. F,µ.c.
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTI LE DATE
WATCR PURVEYOR ~i4il
A SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW .9 Zg ~5¢p
REQUIREMENTS ( (HAVE 1V01) BEEN MADE
B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS
~
/ 9 7
WATER DIS ~
TRICT SI TURE/TITLE A
COUNTY E NGI1VrCR ' 2(30
~
A PRELIMINAR" DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FnR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE B EN DISCUSSED WITH THE ~ T
A COMME S e
, .
~
SIGNATURE I E DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEIJ PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE JS
A COMMENTS 7~'G oe/.v,
7
SIGI~IATURE/'1 ITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT rub( c r/ZU ~ oo
Z
A PRELIMINARY DISCUS TON HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS P P M (HAVC) (1E~AV rT) BEEN SATISFIED
A COMMENTS l~
~ ~ .
SIGNATURE/T I'LE T
9
SICWER PURVEYOIt ~
~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
ROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A1tE UNDERSTOOD BY THC APPLICANT
A COMMENTS
SIGNATUREffITLE DATE
J v e
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PAItT III
c ~ SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I T NSED LAND SURVEY H COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
RE D MAP AND WRI. LEG DESCRIPTION
\
l~
s~t ~ ~
DATE
_
11909 PHONE Z17.
-Yr DATE 919111 ZIP
~
PARTIV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LE'I'I'ER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I THE UNDERSIGNED SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PEItJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION OR IF NOT THE OWNER ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF
NAME DATE 9%
ADDRESS S PHONE 'rl 22 -1 -71 Z-
~1'~2~la~r-F ~ `7c1 2ZIP GI9 9.0
i
,
9 7
SIGNA~URF(OF/A~PLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE DATE
J /
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR A.FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
vq 017y 199y, BY
~%It~a~e ~o1ilpB 1
Joy Lynn Walker
~
~ A* an t Public and for the State of Washington
~~~~LIC cz ~ ~ Residing at Spokane, WashinQton
~
~0~0My appointment expires July Ol, 1998
~aAi~ A.
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DMSION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTED FILE # ~ ~ ~5 7-
DATE ACCEP'TED B Y L 0
TOTAL FEES RECEIPT #
?-->3 ~
~ r
~'EJR1rgYT ~.il\ 1l ~rlt~, E~l►7T PA►7SP01e s
Date Number
Name n ~ ~~C J Phone
Address /
~
,
Comments
ScL Tt 7- z~^
cusToMEER RouTING
~ Addressing Permit Review Approach Pernut
~ Iiuilding Pernut Shorelmes Info Flood Plmn Permit
a Code WormaLon Short Plut Info Public/Pnvate Roads
~ Commercial Review Subdrvision Info Res Bldg Pernut Rev
~ Conference Temp Use Pernut Srte Dratnage Info
~ rue Safety Review Vssnance Appl Subdrvision Review
I
~ Manufactured Home Zone Check UUIity Pemut
Mechanical Pemuts Zone Info Zone Change Review
Plumbing Permits
~ Pnvate Road Info FEEREQUJRED
i
Revi er ~ T'ime Out
~ ResidenUal Review ~
Sewcr Pemuts
~
~ InformaUon Subdivision Review
i
i
~ Admin Excepuon ULID/Sewer Info
IIinding Sde Plun Info Zane Change Review
I
~ Cert. Of Exemption
~ Comprehensive Plsu► NO FEE REQUIItED
Reviewer Time Out
Cond Use Pemt I
I
F~ Cntical Areas lnfo
~ Nonconfoimmg Use
NO FEE REQUIRED ND FEE REQUIRED
Reviewer Time Out Reviewer Tune Out Reviewer Time Out
I ' I ~ ,
RECEIPT SUMAARY ~
ti~
♦ n
TRANSACTION NUMBER T9700840 DATE 05/19/97
APPLICANT NOVATION, INC PHONE= 509 922 1912
ADDRESS 2616 N LOCUST RD
SPOKANE WA 99206
CONTACT NAME RON / GARCO INC PHONE=
TRANSACTION ZONE CHANGE (ENG & UTILITIES)
DOCUMENT ID 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200 00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 100 00
TOTAL DUE = 300 00
TOTAL PAID= 300 00
BALANCE OWING= 00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
05/19/97 00004133 7139 300 00
PROCESSED BY MARGARET ALDERMAN
PRINTED BY MARGARET ALDERMAN
***,t**************************** THANK YOU
_ i • ~
BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIYISION ADMINISTRATOR
J
IN TNE MATTER OF ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
SHORT PLAT N0. BSP-15-86 ) CONCLUSION AND DECISION
i
THIS MATTER, an application from Max Spalding has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Binding Site Plan policies and R.C.W.
58.17.020 (7) on the lst day of July, 1986.
The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the
responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of
Planning.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION
1. The proposal is to divide approximately 21.2 acres into 18 lots for the
development of industrial sites.
2. The proposal is lacated north of and ad,jacent to Montgomery Drive and
west of and adJacent to Woodruff Road in Section 8, Township 25N, Range
44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington.
3. The current zoning of the property is Restricted Industrial. The
proposed lot sizes, f rontage and intended uses are allowed within this
zone.
4. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as
Industrial. The density and uses proposed are in accord with this
pl anni ng category.
5. That in consideration of the recommended conditions and Spokane County
development standards, the proposal is not detrimental to the public
health, safety and general welfare,
6. That the pro3ect is not exempt from environmental review under the State
Envirvnmental Policy Act.
(A Declaraton of Non-Significance was issued on June 3, 1986 and
circulated to 4 agencies for review and comment. There has not been a
recommendation for a more detailed environmental review).
7. That individual review of building locations and other requirements wi11
be established when building permits are sought for on the individual
lots.
DECISION
Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact, Short Plat Appltcation
BSP-15-86 is hereby APPROYED subject to conditions which sha11 be complied
Ki th by the appl i cant andlor sponsor pri or to fi nal i zati on.
~
DATED THIS ~AY OF , 1986•
1U7DGn S S. AM
Spokane Co ty Subdivision Administrator
. ; • •
CONDITIONS OF APPROYAL FOR BSP-15-86
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. That the preliminary Binding Site Plan be given conditional approval to
July 1, 1989. The Subdivision Administrator may administratively
approve a request for a one year extension of time if the sponsor
submits a written request forty-five (45) days prior to the above
expiration date. A request for an Extension of Time may subject the
proposal to new conditions required by reviewing agencies.
2. That the Binding Site Plan be designed as indicated on the preliminary
drawing of record and/or attached sheets as noted.
3. That the binding site plan provide for right-of-way width for streets as
indicated on the preliminary Binding Site Plan of record.
4. That appropriate street names be indicated.
5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the
approved binding site plan for distribution to the Planning Department
and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the
utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final
binding site p1an.
6. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior
to the filing of the final binding site plan.
7. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter
43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392
be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of
formal action by the Administrator on or before the filing of the final
bindjng site plan, as instructed by the Planning Department.
8. That a survey be required prior to the filing of a final Binding Site
Plan.
9. That individual parking, landscaping and other site improvements
required by the Spokane County Zoning regulations will be established
when development requests are made for the individual lots.
10. Tliat a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire
protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district,
Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health
authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the
filing of the final Binding Site Plan or any phase that the plan is in
conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN
and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for
reproduction.
The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements
and schedule of improvements have been made with the sponsor for
construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER
P.LAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system
and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to
appl i cati on for bui 1 di ng permi ts wi thi n the f i nal bi ndi ng si te pl an.
The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane
County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser
refused a building permit due to the failure of the sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
The sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual
arrangements or agreements.
The final binding site plan dedication will contain the following
statement: "The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved
by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County
Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed
within this binding site plan, and the sponsor will provide for
individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot
prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for
each lot."
i
Conditions of Approval for BSp-15-86 (Cont'd)
County Planning Department (Cont'd)
11. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Qinding
Site Plan until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that
the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for
the Binding Site Plan", signed and stamped by said engineer. The
certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be
certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As
Bui 1 t" water system.
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT
1. Applicant shall deed to Spokane County suffient right-of-way so as to
permit the construction of the cul-de-sac turn around depicted on the
preliminary plan at the terminus of Locust Road. Applicant shall also
deed a 20 ft, radius at Montgomery and Woodruff.
2. That plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards
showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the
County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of
each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a
licensed Professional Civil Engineer,
3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of
drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval
prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat. Drainage
plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional
Civil Engineer.
4. That road and drainage plans shall be submitted for review and approval
by the County Engineer for the roadway improvements which have been
specified for Montgomery prive, Woodruff Road and Locust Road and the
proposed private road,
5. That the private road as depicted on the preliminary site plan is
approved by the County Engineer, It shall be designated as a"Tract X"
fUl-!.;?^f? ;~I.I~JliC ~'1~'~nt-0f-Way t'"dCt.
6> Ihc:i; tflE' fG il0w7 fi~ Stdteflielli; be placeCl Oll tlie i di:E' 0 i 'Lf1e C;1 IIQI !"ig
Plan:
WARNING:Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve,
maintain, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or
providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting
this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on
property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for
said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has
no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine,
survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or
snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with
the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or
assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of
the private road as provided herein.
7. That the applicant shall provide to Spokane County a surety acceptable
to the County Engineer which warranties the construction of the
specified roadway improvements.
The following conditions must be complied with prior to the release of a
building permit for any lot or portion of a lot contained within the Binding
Site Plan:
1. That the improvements for the private road shall at a minimum consist of
a paved strip 24 ft, in width which is designed to accommodate the truck
traffic normally associated with industrial areas.
2. The County Engineer has designated typical roadway section number one,
access standard for the improvement of Woodruff Road which is adjacent
to the Binding Site Plan. This will require the addition of
approximately 10 ft.+ of asphalt and the installation of curb and
sidewalk along the frontages on Woodruff.
, , . .
Ccmdi tions of Apprvval for BSP-i 5-86 (Cont' d)
County Engineer (Cant'd)
3. The County Engineer has designated typical raadway section number one,
access standard fvr Lvcust Raad w►hich is adjacent to the Bi ndf ng Si te
Plan. This will require the addition of approximately 30 ft. + a►f
asphal t and the i nstal l ati on of curb and si dewai ka1 ang the frflntages on
Lvcust.
40' The County Engineer has designated typicai roadway section number one,
major arteri al standard for the improvement vf Montgomery Avenue whi ch
i s adjacent to the Bi ndi ng Site P1 an. Thi s wi11 requi re the addi ti on of
approximately 6ta 10 ft. + of asphalt and the instailation af curb and
sidewalk aiong the frontages on Montgomery,
5. The proposed Bi nd1 ng Si te Pi ar~ shal i be improved to the standards set
farth i n Spvkane County Board of Ccxmmissioners Resol utf vn No. 80-1592
.
as amended, which establishes regu]ativns far roads, appraaches,
drainage and fees in new construction.
COUNTY HEALTH pISTRICT
1. The fi nal Bi ndi ng Site P1 an shali bQ designed as i ndicated vn the
prel imi nary pl an of record and/or any attached sheets as noted.
2. The dedi catory l anguage of the plat wi 7l state that: "Subject to
speci fi e ap,pl i cati +on approval and i ssuance of permi ts by the Hea1 th
Off i cer, the use af # ndi vi dual on-si te sewage systerns may be authar3 zed. "
3. Water service shal l be caordinated thraugh the ai rectvr of Uti liti es,
Spokane CoUnty.
4. Water service shaii be by an existing public water supply when appraved
by the Regional Engineer (Spakane), State Department of Social b Health
Services.
5, Priar to filing the finai plat, the sponsor shal] present evidence that
the site lies within the recorded service area of the water systern
proposed to serve the site. The ded#catory language on tMe binding site
plan shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is
Rrohtbited."
6, The binding site dedicatfan will contain a statement ta the effect
that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health
authorities and the 1 ocai fi re district and purveyvr wi 11 be 3 nsta] 1 ed
wi thi n thi s pl at, and the subdi vi der wi 11 provi de for i ndi vi dual
domestic water service as weli as fire protection tv each tract prfor tv
sale of each tract."
7. Dispasal of sewage eff]uent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prQhf bited.
8. Prior to filing the final binding site plan, the spvnsor shall
demflnstrate tv the sati sfaction of the Spokane County Heal th D# stri ct
that sui tabl e si teS for vn-sf te sewage di sposal systems i s avai 1 ab1 e an
all tracts.
COUNTY UTILITIES
I Pursuant to the Board of County Ccxnmissioners Reso] utivn No.80-0418, the
us+e of on-si te sewer di sposaZ systems i s hereby authorited. Thi s
authvri zatl vn i s conditi vned on eompli ance wi th al 1 rules and
regul ati ons of the Spakane County Heal th Di strict and i s further
cvnditioned and subject to specifiG applicatvn approval and issuance of
permits by the Hea1 th Di stri ct.
~
. i
.
Cbnditions of Approval for BSP-15-86 (Cont'd) ~
County Utilities Department (Cont'd)
2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest
agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
peti ti on i ncl udes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the
si gning of a protest peti ti on agai nst the formati on of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCw Chapter 36.94 which includes the
Owner(s) property. PROYIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the
owner(s) or successor(s) from obJection to any assessment(s) on the the
property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the
formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW
Chapter 36.94.
3. ArLy water servi ce for thi s project shal 1 be provi ded i n accordance wi th
the Coordinated water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. The dedication shall state: "Each dwelling unit sha11 be double plumbed
for connection to future area-wide collectjon systems."
56 A dry sewer connecti on to the future area-wide Sewerage System i s to be
constructed to serve proposed Lots 5 through 13. Plans and
specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be rev9ewed and
approved by the Utilities Departrnent prlor to construction.
s r
APPROYED THIS ~DAY OF , 1986.
,
Subdivisi n Administrator cc: Health District
Caunty Engi neer
County Uti 1 i ti es
Bui 1 di ng b Safety
Applicant
Surveyor
File
r~
- ~ ~
-r
r i
Pop'u
P l • ` '
~
. • V
F~E~,tit~/1l~~'"i~~'►
z ~ ; ~ ~ ~►.J~, ~ ~ 1 ' /
1DG ~UGrK ~ Y
SIM
A r t,-5;
.
AVE
V.--,,,~,~,' m° t ;
~ ~ ) ♦ r~ ~ _ ~~~[1~~ It ;~w
i r
~
~
.''09
,v°
, r
! x~47t ~ '
r~
~ r et
ff!
~ --y
' ► r71 r z u
t
1 i'v A ' r i~ a ~ 7~ ~ .
i
~T~ ffi G
s t 4
~ • ~
; MA
~ Q A~' . k"~' -
` ~ -
~
. 4' ~ ~ -
~
~ a
a
~
PAOJFCT 'hFCPW(IGN ~
r , wt r fs fr dL
w w 4y: "~`uW r'q
tiE~
L+ ti w J~ M~+
. ~ ~ ~
~.`~•+."LITP..
` ~ •~.r `8*' ~ i 0. ~ y r1 w Ir/ ~ ~ ~ ~4
M
~ ~M1t.w~ r , uu ww.~~l~~o eti Yti ~ I~ ~ I~ wY ~
A 1 s~.~ f~ M r V
d F
!
6- -+I ~ t C Q ~ ~
00
y~ o
~ Qr~ ~ F
a
~ ►p `r " ' ~ r LL.
l r
44-00 Mr W' J~ ~ IIO~ OY~ ~M I
r6. fta.w "o..
/1 t v wur, N~ I ri ° 1w Y J Y~1 71LOIL ~ I
~
TbY~wyl0 aYM~ R~KM -f ",1Pr11
~ a ~
~+►c r , I r M {,i Juo ~
~ K UM Wv= J 6 f~ ~ 1o~ _ l t l ~ 1t 74 w y+ a rC 4Watl1t+
p
I~j~ ~ • h• ^ rm rMr~N+y ~ oen r~ a. amw N o oce~7.raw
awtdlLO4 t
Yuu WrydM W eft OMMONaqMO
...i ^ r'* .r.
"rt.°`wy .~7 ao
~ S
d ftti-s m
pw..i ac► o~~ ~
h a~~4 Mrr ! r'.d..,Jf~l°° ww
s
0/0 ~
mw/ rbmu.+y ♦ Q
rAwf,.Ae. V yD a' F~
~w
, + ~t-' ^ ~ ; •fEe~l~"~~y,lr' ~ $or
~s t
r
~8 0
z 3 YISUIITYLMAe ~ ►
w~nt W n wt" w :LLA
U 1
1~ I f o n w e♦ ~ to e t ~ ~ -u " ~ ~
'a L n ~ ~a •ro ou ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ rf[
+ p RECEtiUED
Q Plot Plan LLo;
N
~ • ° ~ ~ SPOKANC COUNY1~ =o~z
n ' t~sR r m ~
. ~ ~
>NY
p 1 1991 k r g
izc
b a r! wY
7' II WA Mu w~~ ~t -
t ~ lu ~ M~ ro. r.-M
nEVIU10N OF 6UIlDlNG ANfl PI.ANfV1NG ~~IJ _ ~ _ • ~
~ wti. , N~7'";+.. s°I BY) I N-~ smKANEVAIIEYiE[[IMI 1 Q
E
R1
a~
=a ~
~9
t ~ ~
. .
m~ a
. ~ . ~
_ _
I
_ I
E
E i
t
W
I
r
o~
I
t i
3
1
8
r
$
4
- - -
~t~
u
w
, s:
.a
~ .r;. d
fl ~ t
^g "
„~,i~.
i ~ _