ZE-0003A-79
~ '4
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY FIEARING EXAMINER NOV 04 1998
8POKAIVE COUNNE,NGINEER
RE Change of conditions withui the ) FINI)INGS OF FACT,
Urban Residenhal-22 (CJR-22) Zone ) GONCI.USIONS ANI)
Applicant Wes Crosby ) DECISION
File No ZE-3A-79 )
1. SBJNMARY OF PROPOSAL ANI) DECISION
Proposal: Apphcation for a change of conditions to allow an 11-urut manufactured home
park in the,exishng Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, whereas the previously approved zone
reclassification restncted site development to a 24-urut apartment complex
Decision: Approved, subject to condiUons
U. FINDINGS OF FACT ANI) CONCLUSI0NS
The Heanng Exanuner has reviewed the application and the evidence of record, and
hereby adopts the followulg findings of fact and conclusions
A. GElVERAL INFORNIATION:
Apnlicant Wes Crosby, P O Box 13717, Spokane, WA 99213
Ownea-s of Site: Wes and Susan Crosby, P O Box 13717, Spokane, WA 99213
Address: None assigned
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to University Road, approximately 100 feet
south of Grace Avenue, in the NW '/4 of Section 9, Townslup 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washuigton
Zoning: Urban Residentlal-22 (tJR-22) zone The site is also designated wlthin the
Aquifer Sensitive Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County
Zoning Code
CorYaprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Urban category of the
Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan The srte is also located m the Aquifer
Sensitive Area, the Town of 1VLllwood Influence Area, the Pnonty Sewer Sernce Area and the
Urban Impact Area designated by the Plan
Endirongnental Review: A Detemvnarion of Nonsigruficance was issued on December 1,
1997 by the Division of Building and Planning
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 1
~
& b
Site Description: The site is approxunately 1 b acres in size, is flat in topography and
undeveloped Vanous items are currently being sorted on the site, and little vegetarion exists on
the site A wire fence unth wood support posts is located along the south properiy line of the
site The site 1s located within the Intenm Growth Area boundanes designated by Spokane
County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act ~
Starrounding Comditions: The site is located adjacent to Uruversity Road, which is
designated as a Pnncipal Artenal by the County Artenal Road Plan University Road is
currently being improved The site is located midway between Montgomery Dnve, wluch is
designated as a Minor Artenal, and State Route 290 (Trent Avenue) The land north of the site is
zoned UR-3 5 and is unproved with single-family homes Residential fencing of vanous types
are located adjacent to the north boundary of the site The land lying south of the site is zoned
Light Industnal (I-2) and includes a single-famlly residence and vanous indusmal uses The
land lying east and northeast of the site is zoned UR-3 5 and is developed with single-family
residences, or is undeveloped The land 1}nng southeast of the site is zoned Light Industnal (I-2)
and is improved with industnal businesses, or is undeveloped The land 1}nng west of the site is
zoned UR-3 5 and I-2, and is unproved with single-family homes and industnal uses Valley
Mission Park is located about a mile southeast of the site
Zoning History of Site: On March 15, 1979, the Spokane County Heanng Exarruner
Committee entered Findings and Order in File No ZE-3-79, wluch rezoned the site from the
Agncultural (A) zone to the Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) zone, under the now expued
County Zorung Ordinance The Findmgs and Order required the project to be developed
generally in accordance wnth the concept presented to the Heanng Examiner Committee, which
was for the development of a 24-27 apartment complex A site development plan for such
project dated January 5, 1979 was also submitted at the time
Effective January 1, 1991, the zorung of the site was re-designated to the Urban Residential-22
(LJR-22) zone, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zomng Code The
Program to Implement specifically preserved conditions of approval and site planrung attached to
a pnor rezone under the Zorung Ordinance, with any change of such conditions required to
comply with the development standards of the cross-over zone for the subject property under the
Zoning Code County Resolution No 85-0900, Zone Classification Transihon Guide, Program
to Implement, p 4 Section 14 504 040 of the County Zorung Code also requires that any
significant change to the approved site plan for a pnor rezone, and any change to the conditions
of approval adopted for a pnor rezone, must be approved at a public heanng before the
applicable heanng body
Project Description: The applicant seeks a change of conditions to allow development of an
11-urut manufactured home on a 16 acre site The applicant also submitted an application and
site development plan for a manufactured home park, m File No MHF-4-97 The Division of
Building and Planrung required the applicant to apply for a change of conditions before the
Heanng Examiner The gross density of the project is approximately 6 9 units per acre The net
density of the project, if the intemal road and common areas illustrated on the site plan were
deducted, would still be well below the maximum net density allowed in the UR-22 zone of 22
residential uruts per net acre of land Minor modificanons of the site plan will be needed to make
the site plan conform with applicable development standards The approval of the site plan for
the manufactured home park will be subject to adminlstrative review and approval
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 2
B. P1\OCYJDUiiAL 11 \.R- Vb_M[ a.6 IilN:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zotv.ng Code Section 14 504 040, and
Chapters 14 622 and 14 SOS
Hearing Date and Location: December 22, 1997, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
Notices: Mailed November 27, 1997
Posted December 5, 1997
Published December 2, 1997
Compliance The Iegal requuements for pubiic notice have been met
Site Visit: December 22, 1997
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resoiutian Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Examuier Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure)
'I'estimony:
Francine Shaw Scott Engelhard
Division of Building and Planning Division of Engmeenng and Roads
1426 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
Wes Crosby Bnan Barney
P O Box 13717 10720 East Grace
Spokane, WA 99213 Spokane, WA 99206
gtegns Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zvning Code,
Spokane County Code Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171, 96-0294, Spokane County
Resolution Nos 97-0321 (adopting intenm ,development regulataons regardwg County IUGAs),
97-0134 (establishing IUGA boundanes), and 85-0900 (adopting Spokane County Zoruna Code
and Program to Implement the Spokane Caunty Zorung Code)
C. IJAIVI) LTSE ArtALYSIS:
1 ChanQe of conditions anr)roval cntena
The County Heanng Examiner C?rdznance authonzes the Heanng Examiner to cons2der
~ change of condition applications at a public heanng The Heanng Examiner is authonzed to
~ grant, deny or grant with such condrtions, modificativns and restnctions as the Examiner finds
necessary to make the land use apphcation compatible wtth the County's Comprehensive Plan
and development regulations See County Resolution No 96-0171, Attachment "A", paragiraphs
' 7(d) and section 11 This includes withaut'limitation compliance with the Spokane County
Zonine, Cade, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the County's Local
' Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11 10 of the Spokane County Code)
~
HE Findings, Conclusions and Dec2sion ZE-3A-79 Page 3
. •
Since a change of conditions application modifies a pnor rezone action, the cntena for
approving a rezone is generally applicable In considenng a rezone application, Washington case
law generally provides that (1) there is no presumphon in favor of the rezone, (2) the apphcant
for the rezone must prove that conditxons have substantially changed in the area since the last
zoning of the prvperty, and (3) the rezvne proposal must bear a substantial relationslup to the
public health, safety or welfare Parkndge v Seattle. 98 Wn 2d 454, 462 (197$), Biarnson v
K.itsan Countv^ 78 Wn App 840 (1995) Spokane County Zonxng Code Section 14 402 (1){2}
indicates that consistency wlth the Comprehensive Plan, detnment to the public welfare and
changed circumstances are relevant in deciding to amend the official County Zorung map
General conformanee with a comprehenslve plan is normally required befare a rezone can
be approved Citlzens for Mount Vernan v Citv of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn 2d $61, 873 (1997),
Cathcart v Snahomish Countv, 96 Wn Zd 201, 211-I2 (198I), and Bassani v Countv
Cammissioners, 70 Wn App 389 (1993) Some cases have dispensed w2th the changed
circumstances requirement where the rezone closely implemented the policies of the
comprehensive plan Btarnson v Kitsap Countv, 78 Wn App 840, 846 (1995), and Save Our
Rural Envuanment v Snohomish Countv, 99 VV'n 2d 363, 370-371 (1983) Where a
comprehensive plan conflicts with zoning regulatlons, the provisions of the zorung code will
normally be construed ta prevail See Weverhaeuser v Pierce Countv, 124 Wn 2d 26, 43 (1994),
Couear Mt Assocs v Kine Countv, 111 Wn 2d 7421 755-57 (1988), and 1VaiWaru Bros v
Commissioners, 108 Wn 2d 477, 480 (1987)
Section 14 100 104 of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that the provisions of the
Zorung Code shall be interpreted to carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan and the general plans for physical development adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners The Comprehensive Plan indicates that rt should be used as a reference
source and guide far making land use decisions Comprehensive Plan, p 2 The "decision
guidelines" set forth in the Comprehensrve Plan are to be used in detenrmrung whether or not a
particular proposal should be approved, conditioned or demed
A change of conditions is not a rezone, since it does not change the actual zone of the
property However, a change of conditions may sigruficantly affect the conditions of approval,
as well as the permitted uses, location of bwldings, landscaping, conditians of approval and other
features in a site development plan approved in conJunction with a pnor rezone Proof of
"changed condltions" would not seem to be compelled for a changed conditions application that
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and w111 have no greater land use impacts than the
pnor rezone proposal
2 Aimlicable oolicies vf Comnrehensive Plan
The proposal is desl,gmated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban
category is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes
vanous land uses, residential development and a high level of public facillties and urban
services It is pnmanly a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-famzly, and
condaminium buildings along with neighborhood commercial, llght industnal, and public and
recreational facilrties
HE Findings, Conclusivns and Declsion ZE-3A-79 Page 4
o'
The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of one (1) to 17 uruts
per acre The more intensive uses in the Urban category, such as liglit industnal and
neighborhood commercial, would be located near or along the heavily traveled streets The
Urban category indicates that the least intensive single-family residential uses should be isolated
from the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily structures will usually be a transitional use
located between swgle-family residential and the more intensive areas See Comprehensive
Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed Definition"
The Urban category includes the following relevant goals, objectives and decision
guidelines
Goal 1 1 Encourage a variety of housing types and densities
Objective 1 1 a Promote fill-in wrthin established development areas and
eYrsting outlying communities where utilities, artenals, schools and
community facilittes have already been established
Decision Gurdeline 1 1 1 Urban development will be approved in areas
having adequate power supplies, water, sanitary and storm sewers,
streets, and school and fire services, provided that such development
meets the intent of other Objectives and Decision Guidelines of thts
section
Objective 1 1 b Hrgher-density developments such as multi family and
mobzle homes (manufactured homes) parks should be located with direct
or near access to the mayor arterral systems rather than on interior
netghborhood streets Access to pubtc transportatron shotrld also be
constdered
Decision Guideline 112 Base net density for srngle family dwelling
areas and for mult famtly dwellrng areas may be increased through bonus
options, bonus denstties, zero lot Irnes or similar methods when meeting
the fill-in cntena
Decision Guideline 113 A multifamrly dwelling strtccture exceeding
three (3) resrdential units or a development of such structures or
manufactured homes (except those on single family lots) should
a) locate adjacent designated arterials,
b) locate near existing or planned public transit routes,
c) improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single family
amenitaes
Decision Gurdeline 114 A varcety of denslties and residential uses
should be available to provide a freedom of choace to live in Urban areas
with varying densities, combinations, or mt.x of uses (see detailed Urban
definittotis)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 5
`
Decision Guadeline 116 Development utilrzing construction methods,
site planning and/or landscapcng methods which are considered
innovative should be approved tf the intent of Plan Objectives or Decision
Guzdelines is maintained
Objectzve 12 a Support increased cluster development providing for open
spaces wcth the development
Objective 12 b Ensure adequate open space, recreational facilzties and
parks for residential development
Decision Guldeline 1 21 Cluster development proposals may be
approved when such proposals are compatible with nearby development
and when the overall defined Urban density on the proposal site rs not
exceeded
Decision Guideline 12 2 The need for recreation and open space created
by residenttal developments should be met and be rn conformance with
ordinances, plans and policres prior to resrdential development approval
Decision Guideltne 12 2 The need for recreatcon and open space created
by residential developments should be met and be in conformance with
ordinances, plans, and policies prior to residential development approval
Decision Guideline 13 3 All Urban development proposals should
require public sanitary and storm sewer systems or interim sewer systems
to protect water quahty
Goal 15 Encourage a healthful and pleasing environment in the
Cotcnty's residential areas
Objective 15 a New residential or multiple family should be buffered
froni existrng adjacent land uses where adverse effects may develop
Decision Guidelcne 15 1 Buffering and/or landscaping will be used to
mitigate the differences between proposed developments and exrsting uses
Decision Gurdeline 15 2 Landscaping may be required to provide a
healthful and pleasing residential envcrorrment
Decision Guidelcne 15 4 Sidewalk facilrties will be required along
arterials connecting residentral areas with community facilities and/or
commercial areas
Objective 15 d Resider:tial areas should be drscouraged tivithin high
norse level zones such as in the vrcinity of arrports, rarlroads and
freetivays
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 6
Objechve 15 e YYhen a neighborhood experiences pressure for change in
character, such change shall be permitted upon appropnate review
Objective 15 g In many rnstances, mobrle homes and multifamily
development may be appropriate to renew residential areas
Decision Guideline 15 7 Before approving any multifamily houstng or
manufactured home development proposals, it should be determined that
such development will enhance the residentaal character or aesthetres, or
will cmprove residential values of the area
Objective 15 8 When determining whether a proposal will change the
exrstirig land use character of an area, factors to consider may include
a) the structure hecght of the proposal in relatron to structure
height of nearby structures, and
b} whether new structures will have a positave or »egative tmpact
upon the neighborhood 's architectural character
Deciszon Guidehne 1 61 Before land use proposals are approved they
should
a) conform to plans, policies and regulations of County water, sewer, storm sewer,
utility and spectal service districts,
b) cor form to County transportatlon plans and polictes, and
c) identify and take steps to resolve sigraif cant adverse impacts upon e,czsting
utrlitres, (a e wateP, sanitary and storm sewers, utihty, available and future
energ,y resources), and traffic systems
The property is also located within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated in the
Comprehensive Plan See Comprehensive Plan, Section 14 This is an area where growth,
development and higher intensities of land use are encouraged Comprehensive Plan, Objective
14 1 a Tradihonal urban problems such as incompatible land uses, envuonmental pollution and
traffic congestion are to be managed with greater attention to the general pubhc's well-being
inside the tJIA Comprehensive Plan, Objechve 14 1 e
The site is located in the Town of Millwood Influence Area The pobcies of the
Comprehensive Plan regarding such area are set forth in Section 31 of the Plan
The Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan contains the County Artenal Road
Plan and numerous policies relahng to development and use of county artenal and local access
roads Comprehensive Plan, Section 21 The Artenal Road Plan descnbes vanous classes of
artenals, with the remavvng county roads considered Local Access roads The County Artenal
Road Plan Maps designates artenals as Pnncipal Artenals, Minor Artenals, etc , and lists design
cntena applicable to each classification
The Artenal Road Plan charactenzes a Pnncipal Artenal (without controlled access) as a
four or more lane (including turning lane), moderately fast facihty designed to permlt relatively
unimpeded traffic flow between major traffic generators, such as the central business distnct,
major shopping centers, major employment distncts, etc Pnncipal Artenals are considered the
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 7
. ~
framework road system for the urbaruzed portion of the county, and are to be located on
community and neighborhood boundanes The desired nght of way width for a four lane
Pnncipal Artenal under the Artenal Road Plan is 100 feet, wnth minlmum roadway width of 63
feet prescnbed between curbs Common features along such artenals include pedestnan
crosswalks at signalized intersections, restncted parking, landscaping, drainage, street-lighting
and separated sidewalks See Comprehensive Plan, p 246-247, 253-254 and Figure 21-4 The
Artenal Road Plan recommends the early acquisition of the prescnbed ngbt of width for
Pnncipal Artenals, though actual road construction within such nght of way may be
accomplished in phases over time Comprehensive Plan, p 253
Decision Guideline 21 13 of the Transportation Secnon states that the revlew of land use
proposals should contain provisions for extensions, alignments and adequate nght of way
acquisition for designated County Artenals The Transportahon section encourages an adequate,
efficient, safe, economical and energy-conservmg artenal system, which provides converuent
access to homes, employment, shopping, personal business and recreation Decision Guideline
214 2 Decision Guidelines 214 5 and 215 7 recommend that the function of existing and
future artenals be preserved by controlling land uses, parkulg and direct access along the
artenals Decision Guidelme 215 11 encourages pedestnan facilities to enhance the safety and
convenience of pedestnan travel and to provide access to neighborhood facilities Decision
Guideline 21 5 3 encourages land use planrung that will muumize the need for high capacity
transportation comdors and encourages land uses in areas that can take advantage of the
available capacity of existing artenal streets
The Transportation policies of the Comprehensive Plan are implemented pnmanly through
the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction adopted by the County The
Road Standards authonze the County Division of Engineering and Road to adopt certain
functional classifications for designated artenals and local access roads, and specify design
standards and improvement cntena for such road classifications
3 The nrot)osal. as conditioned. Lyenerally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan. bears a
substantial relationshin to and will not be detnmental to the public health. safetv and izeneral
welfare. and comulies with the Countv Zorvnp- Code and other applicable develovment
regulations
The site is currently zoned UR-22, a zone which specifically implements the Urban category
of the Comprehensive Plan The purpose and intent of the UR-22 zone is set forth in Zoiung
Code 14 622 100, as follows
The purpose of the UR-22 zone rs to set standards for the orderly
development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable
Itvtng envtronment that is compatible with surroundtng land uses and
assures the protection of property values It rs intended that this zone be
used to add to the variety of housing types and denstties, and as an
implementatcon tool for the Comprehensive Plan Urban Category General
characteristics of these areas incltide paved roads, public sewer and water,
accesstbility to schools and libraries, and a full line of publcc services
cncluding manned fire protectron and publtc transtt accessibrlrty Offices
are permitted in the UR-22 zone in order to provcde some of the service
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 8
needs generated by high-intensity land uses The highest density residentral
zone, UR-22, rs rntended primarrly for multiple farrtily dwelltngs and is
usually located adjacent to major or secondary artertals It is used as a
transition between low or medium density mulhple family uses and intensave
commercial or low intensrty cndustrial uses and to provide for higher density
houszng tn locahons close to employment, shoppcng and major
transportation where movements of people can be ha»dled ejficrently and
with least overall adverse impact
The project is located along a Pruicipal Artenal, which implements the locational
preferences of the Urban category for manufactured home parks and the UR-22 zone for higher
density housing The project will be served by a high level of public services, mcluding modern
utilities, and public sewer and water The site is located within the Public Transportation Benefit
Area (PTBA), the area designated by the County Zorung Code where the Spokane Transit
Authonty is responsible for provlding public transit services See Zoning Code 14 300 100,
defirutions The applicant is required to improve Uruversity Road wlth addihonal asphalt, curb
and sidewallc, and is required to dedicate nght of way to the County for such road
The site is located in a developed area, and has reasonable proximity to pubhc schools and
parks The industnal uses located near or adjacent to the site are of low intensity, and the project
will be compatible with such uses No objections to the project were received from neighbonng
property owners The density of the proJect is well below that allowed in the UR-22 zone, and
below that of the apartment complex approved previously on the site Manufactured homes by
their nature will not have an excessive height objectionable to the owners of single-fanuly homes
in the area The locahon of the site next to industnal uses and, older single-fanuly homes, along
an artenal, and near other artenals and a railroad line, is appropnate for manufactured home
housing The Town of Millwood was contacted regarding the project and offered no comment
The project is consistent with the policies of the Town of Millwood Influence Area, as discussed
in the Staff Report
The Staff Report recommended approval of the project, as conditioned The Staff Report
noted minor discrepancies m the site development plan with the development standards of the
County Zorung Code appLcable to the site, including the need for additional landscaping, the
need to widen the access/approach to the proposed manufactured home park, sight-obscunng
fencing and the need for a recorded aviation easement The Staff Report also noted the need to
aggregate the tax parcels making up the site into a single tax parcel, which would eliminate the
need for certain side yard setbacks Fire Distnct No 1 indicated a need to review the adequacy
of the entrance gates t the project for the clearance of fire trucks These discrepancies will be
resolved through the administrative review and approval of the manufactured home park site plan
under Chapter 14 80 of the Zorung Code
No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsigruficance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the Division of Building and Planning The proposal will not have more than a
moderate effect on the quality of the environment, and the Examiner concurs with issuance of the
DNS The procedural requirements of chapter 43 21 C RCW and chapter 11 10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 9
The project complies with the County's intenm development regulatlons applicable to
development projects located within the County's Intenm Urban Growth Area (IUGA)
boundanes County Resolution No 97-0321 requires development sites in the County's IUGA
to be served with public sewer and water The project unplements such requirements
4 Conditions in the area have sufficiently chanQed to jushfy the proposed change of
conditions, as condrtioned
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself The Zonmg Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 14 402 020 (2) Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts Bassam v Countv
Commissioners, 70 Wn App 389, 394 (1993) Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not requued for a rezone where the proposed rezone closely implemented the
policies of a comprehensive plan Biarnson, at 846, Save Our Rural Environment v Snohomish
Countv, 99 Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983)
Since the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and vvill have no more impact on
neighbonng properties than the apartment proJect approved m 1979, proof of changed
circumstances is not required Changes whlch support the project include population growth in
the area, the ongoing improvements to Uruversity Road, the extension of public sewer to the area,
and designation of the site within the County's ILJGA Vanous land use approvals that have
occurred in the area since 1979 could also be cited as changed conditions See Staff Report, p 2
III. I)ECISgON
Based on the above Fmdings of Fact and Conclusions, the change of conditrons application
for the development of an 11-unit manufactured home park is hereby approved, subject to the
conditions of approval of public agencies stated below Any conditions of such agencies which
have been added or significantly revised by the Heanng Examiner are rtalicized
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner This approval does not wmve the applicant's obligahon to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with junsdiction over land development
SPOKAIVE COZJNTY DIVISION OF BUILY)ING ANI) PLANNING
1 All conditions imposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include the project sponsor, the owner (s) of the property, and theu heus,
assigns and successors
2 Pnor to the issuance of any building pennlt for the subJect property, the applicant shall
secure the appropnate land division approvaIs pursuant to RCW Chapter 58 17 and Section
12 100 110 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 10
. .
3 The Director of the Divlsion of Building and Planning/designee shall review any proposed
manufactured home park, as requrred by Chapter 14 808 of the Spokane County Zontng Code, to
ensure compliance wlth these Findings and Conditions of Approval
4 A specific and detailed site development plan will be submitted for the Division of
Building and Planrung review approval as part of the manufactured home park review and pnor
to the issuance of any building permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy
Appropnate bonds or proof of construction must be submitted at the time of the manufactured
home park review to cover the estimated cost of on-site unprovements which were required as a
part of the project approval
5 The applicant shall develop the subject property m accordance with the concept presented
to the Heanng Exammer Minor vanations, when approved by the Director of the Division of
Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted, as provided in Sections 14 504 040 and
14 808 020 of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended All vanations must conform to
regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and other applccable development
regulations, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be mainta.med
6 The Division of Building and Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Nohce shall serve as
public notice of the condihons of approval affecting the property m queshon The Title Notice
should be recorded withui the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The Title Nohce shall
generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a
Spokane County Heanng Exammer on [ ] imposing a vanety of special development
conditions File No ZE-3A-79 is available for inspection and cop}nng in the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planrung
7 Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Building and Plaruvng/designee
of a specific lighting and sigrung plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any
building permrt
8 A specific landscape plan, plantmg schedule and provisions for the mauitenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Building and Plantung/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project pnor to approval of the site
development plan for the manufactured home park and pnor to the release of any building
permits Landscaping shall be installed and maultained so that sight distance at access points is
not obscured or impaued
9 A six (6)-foot-high concrete, masonry or decorative block wall, solid landscaping, or site-
obscunng fence shall be provided and maintained on the north and east property Ime of the
subject property, consistent with Section 14 622 365 of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as
amended
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 11
10 Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels
shall be reviewed by the Duector of the Division of Buildmg and Planning/designee for
compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable
development regulations, as amended
11 The site development plan for the manufactured home park shall indicate all penmeter
boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and indivldual in-park spaces consistent
with Section 14 808 040 (2-3) of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended
12 A filed aviation easement satisfactory to the Spokane International Airport Board, Fauchild
Air Force Base and/or other air traffic control agency shall be provided pnor to the Division of
Building and Planrung's approval of any manufactured home park site development plan or
building pernut
SPOKANE COgJNTY DIVISION OF ENGIIVEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building peranit or use of property as proposed:
1 The applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on Uruversity Road for nght of way The applicant
shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane
County Standards
2 Access pernuts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer
3 A parlcing plan and traffic cuculation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parlcing stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be requued for any portion of the project wluch is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
4 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
5 The County Engineer has designated a 3 Lane Minor Artenal Roadway Section for the
improvement of Uruversity Road wluch is adjacent to the proposed development This wnll
require the addition of approximately 11-13 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed
6 All requued unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction, and other applicable County standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertauung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management, in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane County Resolution No 95-0498 as amended, and are applicable to tlus proposal
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 12
y . w
8 No constnuction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed nght of way
unhl a permrt has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road nght of
way is subject to inspectxon and approval by the County Engineer
9 All requued construction wltlun the exishng or proposed public n,ght of way is to be
completed pnor to the release of a builciing pemut, or a bond in an amount estunated by the
County Engineer to cover the cQSt of construction or unprovements shall be filed with the
County Engmeer
10 The County Artenal Road plan idenhfies Uruversity Road as a 100-foot wide Pnncipal
Artenal The ezisting nght of way width equaluig 24 feet from centerlin.e is not consistent with
that specified in the Plan In order to unplement the Artenal Road Plan at is recommended that in
addition to the required nght of way dedication, a stnp of property 23 feet in width along the
University Road frontage be set aside in reserve This praperty may be acquired by Spvkane
County at the time when Artenal Improvements are made to University Road
11 The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicanfs property, includmg pmperty to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligahon for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilihes The applzcant should check with the applicable utilihes and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utilrty is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
12 The applicant is advised that the unternal, road plans for the manufaetured home park wili be
reviewed by the Division of Engineenng and Raads at the request of the Division of Builduig
and Planrung
SPOKAI'dE COgJNTY DMSIO1V OF ZJ'TILIZ`IES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
A sewer connection permrt is required
2 The appllcant shall subm.tt expressly to the Utilitles Dlvision, "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets shawing sewer plans and specifications for Public Sewer Connections and
Facihties for review and approval by ~the UtihtYes Division pnor to finalization of the projeck
andl,or issuance of a pernut to connect
3 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made pnar to issuance
of a sewer connection permit
4 Any water sernce for this project shall be provided m accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County,sas amended
5 Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by
the Water Resources Sechon
HE Findinors, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 13
. . w
S~OKANE REGIOIi1AL I-IEEAI.TH DIS'I'RIC'g'
1 The sponsor is required to connect to the Spokane County Sewer for sewage disposal and
to Irvin Water Distnct for a public water supply The use of on-site sewage disposal systems or
pnvate wells will not be approved
DATED this 5`'' day of November, 1998
SPOKANE C'OUNT'Y HEARIIlrG EXAMgNER
i? fa.~ r
-
Michael C Dempsey, V4TSBA #823Y ~NO'Y'ICE OF FINAL DECISION AND IVOTIGE OF RIGHZ' 'I'O APPEAAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner
on an application for a change of conditions application is final and conclusive unless within
ttiventy-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing
files a land use petition m supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter
36 70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Heanng Exanuner's decision is three days after it is
mailed
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on November 5, 1998 The date
of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is therefore November 9, counting the next business
day when the last day for mailing falls on a weekend or hohday "I"HF, LAS'T' DAY FOR
.APPEAI_, OF 'I`HIS DECISION 'I'O S~.J.JP'ERIOR ~OURT BY LAND USE PlE'I'ITIO1V I5
1VOVIE1VIBER 30.1998.
The camplete record in this matter, including this deciszon, is on file dunng the appeal penod
with the Office of the Heanng Examiner, T'hird Floor, Public Works Bu1lding, 1426 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Waslungton, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490 The file may be inspected
dunng normal worlang hvurs, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except hohdays, between the
hours of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance
HE FZndin'gs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-79 Page 14
~ File No. ZE-3-79
SPC)KAME CC]UNTY
HEAR1NG EXAMIIVER CUMCV}lTTEE
.
\NAFINDINGS AND ORQER
A. iNTRQQUCTIJN ~
This matter having come before the Examiner Cammittee vn March 15, 1979, and
the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane
Myers, and Glenn Quigley (Mr. Quigley exeused himself because of a passible
conflict prior ta any diseussian) and there being the following persans present
who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; N"9r, Briggs, Nfr. Crvsby, Mr.
SMade for a Zone Ghange, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban for the
purpose of apartments.
8, FiND1NGS OF FACT
1. 7hat the existing land use in the area is single famify residences and a
proposed apartment camplex.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
residential develapnient or use under study.
3. That the existing zaning of the property described in the applicatian is
agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Envfranmentai Poiicy Act)
have been complied +with.
5, T hat the p roper I ega Irequ i rements for adverti sement of the Agenda 1 tem
have been fulfilled.
6. That this propasal is nat in confiict with the pravisians of adopted regula-
tian or intent of adopted policies.
7. That #.he Iand in this area i5 suitab1e far the praposed use, or uses within
th+e proposed Zone Classifieation.
~
'y File No ZE-3-79
:
8 That the proposed use is compatibie with existing uses in the area
9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use
10 The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare
C ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of Wes Crosby for a Zone Change, Agricultural to Multiple Family
Suburban as described in the application should be approved
Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion
a County Engineer's Office
The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if
the rezone is approved
NOTE All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed
minimum County construction standards
1 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, 5 foot sidewalk and
pave to existing pavement on University
2 Appiicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access
plans before issuance of building permits
2
♦ ~f
File No ZE-3-79
~
b Spokane County Health District
The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District
in providing for adequate sewage disposal All necessary Health District
permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance
Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health
District
c County Fire Marshal's Office Fire District #1
Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of
the Spokane County Fire Marshall
Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicies to be approved prior to
building permit issuance
d Water purveyor I RV I NG #1
We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water
e Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments
above
f The applicant shafl develop subject property generally in accordance withtn
the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations
when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including,
but not limited to the following changes- Building location, building
materials, landscape plans, and general atiowabie uses of the permitted
zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth tn the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans
shall be maintained
g A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance
bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to
building permit issuance
3
~ • r .
File No ZE-3-79
J
, h That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21c.080 RCW
and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accomplished
by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing
Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff
i Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved
~ That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a
review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-
significance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final
declaration of non-significance
k Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on University Road for right-of-way
Motion by Mrs Myers Seconded by Mr. Thomas
Vote Unanimous
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
14
_,,za Chairman
ATTEST
FRED L DAYHARSH
PlanninQ Director
B y
~ -c
4
t
~
v q
: a c
STAFF ANALYSIS March 15, 1979
~ZE-3-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
CROSBY
I FINDINGS OF FACT
a. Zoae Classification
1 North Agricultural, established, 1942
2 West. Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955
3. South• Agricultural, established, 1942
Reszdential Industrial, established, 1978
4 East• Agricultural, established, 1942
b. Land Use
1. Site: Single family residences
2 North: Single family residences
3 West. Single family residences
4 South: Vacant (proposed apartment complex)
5. East: Single family residence
c Development Plan
Property area. 66,600 sq. ft./24-27 units = 2,467
; sq. ft./unit
( Proposed building area 10,800 sq. ft./18% coverage
Parking area (Spaces): Required - 36 Actual - 36
d Regioaal Comprehensive Plan - 1968
The Plan Map has designated this area appropriate for residential or use
under study development.
e. Compliance with SEPA.
The Planning Department staff has circulated a proposed declaratioa of
non-significance and received ao comments from Agencies of Expertise,
therefore, a recommendation that a final declaration of non-significance
be issued
II. REVIEWING AGENCY COMMENTS•
a. County Eagineer's Office•
The County Eagineer's Office has requested the following be considered if
the rezone is approved
NOTE All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed
minimum County construction standards
(contiaued)
a
1
STAFF ANALYSIS March 15, 1979
~
ZE-3-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN CROSBY
d. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Actioa pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW
and the Board of Countp Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be
accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by
the Board, as instructed by the Plaaning Department staff
e. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved.
f. Direct light from aay exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend
over the property boundary.
C
~
D~P
, .
_ - , ~ 1
~ _ . ~ ~
t -C
~
~ _ _ - _
" _ _
_ - ~ -
- -----r---~"" ~ -
.
•r ~
~ •
. • , .
i ,
~ ~ •
r r"
i
....-J.--~~ .
_ ~ /J J
• / ~ ~'7 y
l '-_.l. ~ ~ ~
-
-
~
1
r~
1 .
, ~ _
~~1~~~ n
. ~
Cancejzci File ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
Date Filed
Date As Built Plans Received
Date Road Plans Approved REZONE FII.E # ZE-0003A.79'79
New Raad Standards 5-15-95 Mylar
Companion File MHP-497
Hearing Date: 12/22/1997 H Time: 01:30 H Number: 1 Related File ZE-0{)03-79
Technical Rcview Date: 10/30/1997 TR Time: 03:15 Building I?ept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: 'I'ECH REVIEW #
Large Lot ❑
Date Received: 10/20/1997 Review Type:
No. Lot 11 No. Acrc !.Ot !
Project Name: CHG OF COND PICKET FENCES FROM 22 APT TO 11 UNIT MFG Range-Towaship-Section: 44- 25 - 9
Site Address: E UNNERSITY/N BUCKEYE/S GR.ACE/N MONTGOMERY PARCEL(S): (flrst 20)
Applicant Name: CROSBY, WES Phone (509) 926-5229 45092.0779 45092.0780 45042.0791
Applicant Address: PO BOX 13717 Phone 2# (509) 994-3972
SPOKANE, WA 99213
~ Date Conditions Mailed:
Flood Zone EQ___ Water 4 Sewer School IW Fire 1 Phone
Billing CROSBY, WESLEY Owner: CROSBY, WES Engineer
Address: PO BOX 13717 Address PO BOX 13717 Company
SFOKANE, WA 99213 SPOKANE, WA 99213 Address:
Phone: (509) 926-5229 Phone: (509) 926-5229 Phone:
Fax:
Signed Name WESLEY C CROSBY
Building # 456-3675 / Planning # 456-2205 Contact: FRANCINE SHAW
ilata CLhmittaii Il~+crr~t~ TI111~
10/30/1997 DATE TECHNICALLY COMPLETF
DATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETf;
09l30/1997 DATE PAY FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMFLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING I
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
ln-0ut #1 ln-Out /12 In-Out #3
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OL1T
In-Out q4 lo-0ut a5 In-Out /16
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED I
DATF_. AOND RECEIVED BOND AMOtTNT RECENED
D:VIT I30h`I) RELE'.ASE - DATE, BUND R1:I~i_iCF.I~ [301N,ll E3:1!_Ati'CE
Heartrig Date Deciston Approved ~ Denied Condnued Appealed BCC Approved Denied ~
Appealed to Court Approved Denied Continued Final Project Status
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO 5ECRETARY (SANDY)
• 9 tK
C
SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS
CALCULATION SHEET
Description: Project No.:
Calc. by: Dote: Title:
Checked by : Date : Sheet of
Notes :
-r - -
.
~
FT1 - -
1- 4 - ~
. ~
- ~ ~
.
- ~ ~
~
•
i %A _ ~ ~ •
I ~
. ~
.
o . . .
► 1 . ~ . ~ ~I
_ ~
- - ~ • ~
I f ~ q
~
_ . _ ~ ~ ~t
_i
~
vi
. ~
-1- . f , -
.
.
_ ~ ~ . - - ~
~ .3 . ~
. 3
A
_ ~ • ~ .
- . ~ ~ r •
r4
'+4
. - - - . . N
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINEF"
,
i' F i le#: ZE-3A-79
U&
ME OIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOKANE COLJINM
,
HEARING DATE: December 22, 1997 F1LE ZE-3A-79
PROJECT PLANNER: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditions to allow an 11 unit Manufactured Home Park
(file no. MHP-4-97) in the existing Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone whereas the previously
approved zone reclassification (file no. ZE-3-79) restricting site development to a 24 ur?.
apartment complex.
~ . i. _ ` r : , ~ Y., ._.s i-~..,.
v..4i .:i~ :a
TAFF ECOMMEN~:=~~v:
conditioned.
Project Data
Project Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to University
Road, approximately 100 feet south of Grace A\iPn; :
in the NW of Section 9, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, in Spokane County, Washirc--i"r -
Parcel Numbers: 45092.0779, 45092.0780, and 45092.0791
Owner: Wes Crosby
P.O. Box 13717. 5,ckane VVA 9921:
(509) 926-5229
Agent Same as above
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Urban
Zoninr): Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) (file no. ZE-3-79)
Existing Land Use: The site is vacant and undeveloped.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:
• North: Land located north of the subject site is zoned Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and is primarily occupied by
medium density single family residences.
• South: Land located south of the subject site is zoned Ligh 'i
Industrial (I-2). Existing land use includes a non-
coriforming single family residence and various
industrial businesses.
• East: Land located east and northeast of the subject site i
zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Land Iocate :
southeast of the site is zoned Light Industrial(I-2',
Existing land uses include medium density single
family residences, vacant undeve!nc,ed I~~d -qnd
industrial businesses, respectiveiy.
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22 =.~9 - . ulh.
1 n f "J
~
c
• West: Land located west of the subject site is zoned Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Light Industrial (I-2).
Existing land use includes single family residences
and industrial development.
Known Land Use Proposals and Various land use actions have been approved in the
Recent Project Approvals in the vicinity of the proposal during the last twenty years
Area of this Project and include zone reclassifications ZE-41-78 (to the
Light Industrial, I-2, zone for light assembly, office
and warehouse), ZE-61A-83C (to the I-2 zone for
office and warehouse), ZE-41-87C (to the 1-2 zone for
warehouse and those uses allowed in the I-2 zone),
ZE-5-96C (to the Urban Residentiat-7, UR-7, and I-2
zones for those uses allowed in the respect zones),
ZE-25-84C (to the I-2 zone for those uses allowed in
the I-2 zone), ZE-191-78C (to the I-2 zone for office
and warehouse) and ZE-105-78C (78 (to the I-2 zone
for those uses allowed in the I-2 zone).
Land Division Status: The site is comprised of three tax parcels, each of
which are portions of Blocks 43, 44, and/or 45 of
Fairacres Subdivision: Fairacres Subdivision was
finalized and recorded in 1908. Spokane County
Assessor's records indicate tax parcels 45092.0779
and 45092.0780 were created in 1978 and tax parcel
45092.0791 was created in 1980. As of March 13, 1978, all property division in Spokane County require
either formal platting approval consistent with RCW
58.17 or the approval of a Certificate of Exemption ~
exempting the property division from the formal
platting process pursuant to RCW 58.17 and Section
12.100.110 of the Spokane County Subdivision
Ordinance. Review of the legal descriptions for the
properties indicate the tax parcels have not been
platted consistent with RCW 58.17 and are not
considered legal building lots. Review of the Division
of Building and Planning Certificate of Exemption log
for this area indicates no Certificates of Exemption
approvals have been issued for the property
recognizing the parcels as legal building lots and
exempt from RCW 58.17. Prior to the approval of
any manufactured home park and/or issuance of any
building permits for the properly, the applicant shall
secure the appropriate land division approvals or
exemptions from the Division of Building and
Planning in order to recognize the property as a legal
building lot. This will require either Plat, Short Plat or
Certificate of Exemption approvals.
Shoreline Designation: Not applicable.
Water Purveyor: Irvin Water District No. 6 will provide public water
service to the site. The use of private wells and water
systems is prohibited. Water service shall be
coordinated through the Director of Utilities.
Sewage Disposal: A public sewer system will be made available to
serve the proposed manufactured home park as
authorized by the Director of Utilities. Plans and
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
2of7
•
~
specifications fcr
submitted for review prior to finalizing the project.
Fire District The subject site is located in Fire District No.1. Tf
Fire District requested a drawing to scale for reviE I
of the manufactured home park entrance gates fo,
clearance of fire trucks. A site development plan wds
circulated to Fire District No. 1 on November 28,
1997. No additional comments have been received
by the Fire District regarding the entrance gates.
This issue will be resolved prior to approval of the site
development plan for the manufactured home park.
School District and nearest K-12 The proposal is located in the East Valley School
schools: District No. 361. The School District was contacted
and no comment was received regarding the
proposal.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The subject property is located east of and adjacent
to University Road. University Road is identified as a
Principal Arterial by the Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan with a planned right-of-way width of 100
feet. The site development plan illustrates a twenty
(20) foot wide strip to be set aside as a Future
Acquisition Area (FAA). The Division of Engineering
has requested the twenty-three (23) feet of Future
Acquisition Area (FAA) and the dedication of seven
(7) feet of additional right-of-way along University ~
Road.
Nearest Parks and Distance: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan
identifies Valley Mission Park as the County park ~
facility located nearest to the proposal. Valley
Mission Park is located approximately one (1) mile
southeast of the proposal on Mission Avenue.
Neighborhood Association: None identified by the applicant.
❑ This proposal is located inside the IUGA.
0 This proposal is located inside the Influence Area of the Town of Millwood.
• This proposal is located inside a Public Transportation 6enefit Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated
Natural Resource Lands.
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject site is located within both the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone
and the Priority Sewer Service Area
(PSSA).
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas: Not applicable.
Floodplain: Not applicable.
Geologically Hazardous Areas: Not applicable.
Wetlands: Not applicable.
SEPA
❑ DNS issued December 1, 1997.
0 Comment period ended December 20, 1997.
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
3of7
r
, .
Noticina
Published: Spokesman Review on December 2, 1997
Mailed: The deadline for mailing the Notice of Hearing and posting notice on the subject
property was December 5, 1997.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete): October 14, 1997.
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: October 30, 1997.
Date Notice of Decision is Due: February 11, 1998.
Reviewinp Aqencies
17 Agencies were notified on December 1, 1997. Comments were due December 15, 1997.
Agencies Notified Response Date ! Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received I Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes December Spokane County Yes December
of Engineering and Roads 16, 1997 Division of Utilities 16, 1997
Spokane Regional Health Yes December Spokane County Division No
District 8, 1997 of Building and Planning
Spokane County No Spokane County Yes October 30,
Division of Parks, Development 1997
Recreation and Fair Engineering Services
SCAPCA No Long Range Yes December
Planning Division 2, 1997
Fire Protection Yes November East Valley School No
District No. 1 14, 1997 ' District No. 361
Irvin Water District No. 6 No Spokane County No
Boundary Review Board
Spokane County No Spokane Regional No
Stormwater Utility Transportation Council
Spokane Transit Authority No WA State Department of No
Transportation
WA State No
Department of Ecology
Responses from the Public: No letters from the public have been received regarding the
proposal.
Description of the Site: The site is approximately 1.6 acres in size and is flat in topography.
The site is vacant and undeveloped with various items stored on the site including a boat, horse
trailer, old boards and farm equipment. Little vegetation exists on site except for native grasses,
weeds and shrubs. A wire fence with wood support posts is located along the east property line
and a board-on-board fence approximately six (6) feet in height is located along the south
property line where the adjacent land use is industrial. Fencing along the north property line is
associated with the single family residences located north of and adjacent to the subject site and
varies with each residential property. Fencing types in this area range from four (4) foot tall "see-
through" cyclone fences to six (6) foot tall sight obscuring board-on-board fences. Access to the
site is provided directly from University Road. University Road is currently under construction.
Overhead transmission lines are located along the east side of University Road.
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
4 of 7
~
. Backqround: In January, 1979, Mr. Wes Crosby, the applicant, submitted an application for a
zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to the Multi-Family Suburban (MFS) zone pursuant to
the now expired Spokane County Zoning Ordinance for the purpose of constructing a 24 unit
apartment complex. A petition in opposition to the proposed multi-family development was
submitted to the Division of Building and Planning which was signed by 50 individuals who live or
own land in the vicinity of the proposal. Issues of concem identified in the petition include the
proposal's impact on the existing single family quality of the neighborhood, obstruction to the
existing skyline due to the proposed construction of three (3) apartment buildings and increased
traffic flow. The public hearing for the proposal was held on March 15, 1979, where the proposal
was unanimously approved with the condition that property be developed generally in accordance
with the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Due to significant opposition to
the multi-family proposal from surrounding property owners/taxpayers and the Condition of
Approval requiring general conformity with the multi-family development concept presented to the
Hearing Examiner Committee, staff advised Mr. Crosby that an application for a Change of
Conditions to the previously approved zone reclassification would need to be submitted and
approved by the Hearing Examiner in order for the site to be developed as an eleven (11) unit
manufactured home park (file no. MHP-4-97).
An application for a Manufactured Home Park (MHP-4-97) has been submitted simultaneously
with this Change of Conditions application. Review and approval of the site development plan for
the manufactured home park is an administrative process per Chapter 14.808 of the Spokane
County Zoning Code and is contingent upon approval of this Change of Conditions request by the
Hearing Examiner.
Staff Analysis:
Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located within the Urban category and east of
and adjacent to the Industrial category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. The Urban
category is intended for the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which
includes various land uses, intensive residential development and a full range of public services
and facilities (public water and sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems, and utility systems
such as electricity, telephone, gas and cable service, schools, parks, libraries, manned fire and
police protection, animal control and street maintenance). The Urban category is primarily a
residential category of single family, two-family (duplex) and multi-family buildings with residential
net densities ranging from 1 dwelling unit to 17 dwelling units per acre. The more intensive land
uses such as light industrial and neighborhood commercial will usually be found near heavily
traveled streets while the least intensive single family residential uses will be isolated from noise
and heavy traffic.
Specific Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category that support the
proposal include Goal 1.1 (encourage a variety of housing types and densities) and associated
Objective 1.1.a (fill-in development) and Decision Guideline1.1.1 (availability of public services
and facilities), Objective 1.1.b and Decision Guideline 1.1.3 (location of manufactured home parks
with direct or near direct access to a major arterial system), Objective 1.1.d and Decision
Guideline 1.1.4 (free choice for all people to live where they please by providing varying densities
within Urban areas), Objective 1.1.e and Decision Guideline 1.1.5 (standards for manufactured
home housing).
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
5 of 7
L
Those Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category that the proposal does
not address include Objective 1.1.c (consideration of density and design of multi-family
developments located adjacent to single family developments), Objective 1.1.f (encourage
innovative design), Objective 1.1.g (encourage energy efficient construction), Objective 1.1.h
(encourage flexible development regulations), Decision Guideline1.1.6 (innovative ideas should
uphold the intent of Comprehensive Plan Objectives and Decision Guidelines), Objective 1.1.i and
Decision Guideline 1.1.7 (home occupations), Goal 1.2, Objectives 1.2.a, b, &c and Decision
Guidelines 1.2.1, 2, & 3(encourage parks and open space in residential areas), Goal 1.3 and the
associated Objectives and Decision Guidelines (conservation and utilization of natural features),
and Goal 1.4 and the associated Objectives and Decision Guidelines (critical areas). The
proposal does not address these Comprehensive Plan policies as these policies are not
applicable to the development. However, the proposal is not in conflict with the recommendations
identified in the Comprehensive Plan policies.
Section 31 of the Comprehensive Plan, Influence Areas of Municipal Entities, is applicable. The
purpose of this section is to provide (Millwood) an acceptable pattern of land use development
within its "influence area" or around its incorporated boundaries. The intent of this section is to
emphasize coordination between particular jurisdictions and Spokane County and include the
city's recommendations within future planning actions. Goal 31.1, Objective 31.1.a and Decision
Guideline 31.1.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommend that (the) proposal should be required
to arrange for public services to be provided by (Millwood). The proposal will be served by public
water and sewer, however, these services are not available to be provided from the Town of
Millwood. Specific Comprehensive Plan policies directly addressing development proposals
within the influence area of the Town of Millwood include Objective 31.1 and Decision Guideline
31.1.16 which recommend consideration of the impact of a proposal on existing water quality,
existing traffic volumes and transportation facilities. The proposal will be served by a public
sewer system and stormwater controls will be in place so no adverse impact to water quality
should occur. Traffic generated from the site is minimal and will not flow through the corporate
limits of the Town of Millwood. The Miliwood Planning Department was contacted on October
20,1997 regarding the proposal and no comments were received.
The proposal is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the
Urban category and the Influence Area Section of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning Analysis: The purpose of the existing Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set
orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living
environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property
values. It is intended that this zone be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities,
and as an implementation tool for the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The highest
density residential zone, UR-22 is intended primarily for multi-family dwellings and is usually
located adjacent to major or secondary arterials. It is a transition zone between low or medium
density multi-family uses and low intensity industrial uses and to provide for higher density
housing in locations close to employment, shopping and major transportation routes where
movements of people can be handled efficiently and with the least overall adverse impact.
General characteristics of these areas include paved roads and a full line of public services
including public water, sewer and manned fire protection
The location of the proposal south of and adjacent to existing medium density single family
residences and north of existing industrial development and the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan and requirements for public water and sewer demonstrates consistency with
the purpose and intent of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
6of7
' I
Furthermore, the proposed manufactured home park is an allowed use within the Urban
Residentiai-22 (UR-22) zone (see Chapter 14.605 of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
Residential Zones Matrix) upon demonstration of compliance with the development standards of
the UR-22 zone and manufactured home parks identified in Chapters 14.622 and 14.808 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, respectively.
The site development plan illustrates an eleven (11) unit manufactured home park with an overall
density of 6.9 dwelling units per acre. The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone allows for a maximum
residential net density of 22 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is well within the density
allowances of the Urban Residential-22 zone and the Manufactured Home Park proposes a density
significantly lower than that proposed with the apartment complex development (15 dwelling units per
acre). Minor modification are required to be made to the site development plan for the proposed
manufactured home park and include an additional twenty (20)-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping
along the property line fronting University Road, a five foot wide strip of Type III landscaping located
along the north and east property line, increase the width of the manufactured home park
access/approach to 34 feet and the submittal of an recorded aviation easement pursuant to Section
14.702.060 of the Zoning Code. All other development standards and criteria have been met.
Review of the site development plan for the proposed manufactured home park with all Zoning Code
regulations and Conditions of Approval is administrative and is required to occur prior to a decision of
approval/denial for the proposed manufactured home park.
In addition to site development plan modifications, the three (3) subject tax parcels that comprise the
site will need to be aggregated into a single tax parcel through a Certificate of Exemption for a minor
lot line adjustment pursuant to Section 12.100.110.1.d of the Spokane County Subdivision o
Ordinance. Aggregation of the subject tax parcels will eliminate two (2) side yard property lines
within the interior of the site and the need to provide the appropriate side yard setbacks from those
property lines. Without the parcel aggregation the current design of the proposed manufactured
home park would need to be revised to accommodate the appropriate side yard setbacks and other
development regulations which are enforced on a tax parcel-by-tax parcel basis.
The proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the existing Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
zone. With minor modifications the site development plan can demonstrate compliance with the
development standards identified within the Spokane County Zoning Code regarding manufactured
home park developments.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as conditioned.
Attachments
A. Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Comprehensive Plan
• Existing Zoning
• Site Plan
B. Agency and Public Comments
C. Recommended Conditions of Approval
ZE 3A-79
Staff Report - December 22, 1997 Public Hearing
7 of 7
. ATTACHMENT A
MAPs
VICINITY MAP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
EXISTING ZONING
SITE PLAN
Ze.003A..79
A~
ity n molp
vici
,
_
i-~'~~ ~ ' ' •1 ~ ~
,
R,J ~ - -r ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ r'
c ~
P ,
1
. S~ ~ .
I 1
F eU,xErE S
.
,
z p
/ z ~c M~ a p ►
' j ~c.xs
• . ~n caRLE Gi
' Y taERY
0~• M~~TG~
O M T ~ x
C0~r (A'
19 b 9 °p
'~SoO•Y.+~v_- C L
r.`prva7r
C)''~'1,~ . R
r' ~ ~ O N ' ` .
~
_ .
, .
ZE-3A-79
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
- ~ - H i ir
w
~ , . .
,
.3-3 AN N
0I'rent,
IWELL SLEY o
4 0
~
~
~
. ~ ~ •
~ Q
. J M
. . : i O ~
EUCLI D
~ .
, I
anai
trip . .
~
MISSIO
27 ~
it
:
~
;
o,
JR-
. I
m r - ~
c I 4
~ ,
tur
F - 6 ° e11 -lB
_ - - - - -
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
ZE-3A=f`79
Existing Zoning
L -
' rairvicw ~
UR-3.4212 SS
~.onaz.o~T~
2.0722 P.c
, .0714
- = y. 2.0715 ,
- - ~
0 2.0772
•072:p•0724
i
- = - • - ~
1-2 . 7~ : } ~`i i 02
~_t~;~; 2.0781
12 • 079t2. OT~ ,r2.0744
<
~ '
_ _ _ _ ~
2.0728
~
1.0104 QTX.;>:-
.
UR-3.5F212 SS
.11 1~4 "
1 .0152 1.0108 1.010
I •O1 51 ~ - _ = 1~ -
1 .Ot53
t.0107 1.0105
B U C k P V P - - =
-I24.~~ ~ Tc 17ti
1 - -
C ~
:.ZIt~557W s-,o~ss 1.0130 =2~~
- ~ - 2 SGS9 - " = -
4Y ~
_ - -
- --I-~i 7~
S~y _ - . =5, TT(ls =
~ tt137 _ : . °
- _ - ~ `i _
C
_ - - - _ _ - ~ - = _
2-1702
- - - ~ i 2._9063 2:9084 -
- - -
r ~
; - - - = Vr ~
= - = ~~Lr ~ -r
~ 2 f ~ro r- :
- - ~ - - - ' - ~ = L
=
I Z2~4 1 .0127
t - _ - - : ~ -
-k ~
g , _ ~ ~ ° - _ ~I ■
- - i:tlf28 , pTD Montgamery m
ri M - - - - - - - . nnir~,
Existing Zoning
r ' p1 C K~ F E
tTr
' x
►~~rEa4T~'~tEt~~'. ~~,.vr ~
~It1AN ! •
✓t 1 ~ ~ < < t
- ~t _ •
• ~~j y ~
t~
•f ~
} r ~
, ~ 5~,e~~,►~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ,d~
s• ~`33'~ CR 4~ Y "f%
. . -t ~ Y o • ,~~Na ~v ~
~
x30'
`~t• ~
/ l~
, / , . 4 ► 'i~!! ~_..-1 ~ j~ . • = i , - _ _ _ a~~
TOO
er+Fk ~ ' ~ 2 "_r _ ~ ~ _ _ -..•.s ,~t ti''' ~
~~t ~ Q• % ~ (~i _ _ _ _ _ u~ _ a c ~y ~ ~
~ . • _ _ p°~
t~~ ~~~•t n ~-w 40~ • b
(A~ ' p i~nui. C~ L~ • ' r 'a8~
'
°Eo --j
~,►1`~ - i~ ""F_ .
1! 7 1: b
f~)
tcC~~~ yss ♦ty~J~ 1~ ; . \ ~ ~ ^ o
~ j ~
~ ~ R
t~y ~
20rNli_Vf)1
Irt nQ , i ( ' ~ '
9 t: •a 't ~ y~ - ~ ! J + ~
~ ' f\ ' ' ~ _ ~ - ` i~~\ • ~
•,,,1 ; ' '~t,~ - ' r 3i ~ ~.~t 2nNirv6 13
7y
: (~1Clt
'
~t~(1 " ✓ ~`'~q . 2 2 L==f-- . ~ /,1 ~ ~ ~ •
~44~~'~ 1.~~~~..• s«r.~^~rtraa'-G~{.ttlt~~l~ ,
~ us~~~yLLtJ-TJ~
Sy Gc:!t~n+-' ~ M t AS ;l1LedU~
S-.-Y-
r ~ .s~.~~~ .I1C~~t 9t"' _t.+•!_-~-Y"
rvr~_•,_..•^-• ~C.~.,$; t1Y~~~~ ~qt rt P lS~r r SYl. I.~c~'_!~-Pi~91.
l~i S 4. i.. in ~r,r..•~~" ~y _ V~~911~
; ~ ~ ~.-.+i-~1'tr,.r r~~..,.et:'t:~=' .~*"~y,,,=4~:~•.~u. "`..s- i-~-~ . . c~
_vJ~,tANi)faCTiRqEin re~~~~"' r e~r;,c:. n.«,., l ~ ,,...t•,~ r~y.:~..c:::i- ~...r ~
S
t~pN.fi 4•~4Q _erv~_if..-, a:~~~ ►'.ir=1 "'1 ~t~t~1'1~ _ ___F..«,''_..
PqGE,y
. n...•• a.
~Lt 4•.~il ~
ZE--3A.79
plan
Site DelveloPment
-
~
Lor 1JS6°
pp,*l 7`S y~°"'e +o~9N~ pT
7YP1 C 1A L LO7-
1p rA1Hb1 ~ q~ _ .
{'TJrr~ "
o ~ . ~ .
_ -
. ~ _ - • - ~ , .
Qt~ ~ _ _ -ryv~ctct►~ : _ `t~ .
C~R 15~~ - ` ' - .
.
~ sg
.
. _ . ~
, ` r..
r ~ ~A+
' :vA
vc` 0 t ~ + ~ ~ • •f f
c
~
ta~ A
rf~,•~) L~,~i~;S.~roCD . l
RoAQ WAY LO7-
Lt~HTS
X
• ~ ,
rA. J
Lor. 6~R 5
~c,~,,Y - t56 ~ i5 i . # ~.t1
57 4~ o Da
,t~;•~"~ I !r, k°"''~ . t'
b D
'l
,
.a 1r . ; ~ ti .1'
~ t` _ ~p_'~'~'• J :,l S ~ 5 ~~~~L
T; . 1 ~ , . ; . %r~. ~
- ~x, 1• ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~li
~ • ~ ~ \~f4
• i • .~i J t~ ~ ~~1 .
~ ~ r ~''`''iy~• _ 4'~• ~V4EAC N LOT
J~
~
~:~o nevelopment Plan
ATTACHMENT B
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENT
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: December 16, 1997
PROJECT: CHG OF COND 22 APT TO 11 UNIT MFG PICKET FENCES
FILE ZE-0003A-79 /
Hearing: 12/22/1997 @ 1:30 #1
Review Date: @ #
Sponsor/Applicant: WES CROSBY
Section Township Range: 09-25-44
Planner: FRANCINE SHAW
Technical Review Date: (10/30/1997 @ 3:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
l. Applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on University Road for right of way.
The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a 3 Lane Minor Arterial Roadway
Section for the improvement of University Road which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 11-13 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed.
CC: Applicant WES CROSBY
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner FRACICINE SHRW
. '
Page 2 of 2
12/22/1997 10/30/1997
ZE-0003A-79
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subj ect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
.
10. The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road as a 100 foot
Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width equaling 20 feet
from centerline is not consistent with that specified in the Pl-an. In
order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property
23 feet in width along the University Road frontage be set aside in
reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Arterial Improvements are made to University Road.
11. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
12. The applicant is advised that the internal road plans for the
manufactured home park will be reviewed by the Division of Engineering
and Roads at the request of the Division of Building and Planning.
HECEI UED
SPQKANE COUN7IF SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT '
DEC ~ 1 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
`"118-10N 01: aUI1,DING AND PLkNUiNG ~DATE: December 8, 1997
TO :
, ; ( ~d PiU~~tiln'•
`Division
FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
0-
SUBJECT: ZE-3A-79/MHP-4-97 (Crosby)
The sponsor is required to connect to the Spokane County Sewer for sewage disposal
and to Irvin Water District'for a public water supply. The use of on-site sewage disposal
systems or private wells will not be approved.
0
Memos\ZE-3A-79 - MHP-=3-97 Crosby/lah
To: FRANCINE SHAW, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Jim Red/Spokane County Utilities
Date: 12/16/97
Subject Conditions of Approval
Planning Action Number: ZE-0003A-79 Type of Action: ZR change of conds; also MHP-4-97
Applicant: Wes Crosby/EHD Inc. Legal Owner: Wes Crosby/EHD Inc.
PO Box 13717 PO Box 13717
Spokane wa 99213 Spokane wa 99213
Sewer Service:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer
connection permit is required.
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate covee', only
those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and
facilities for review and approval.
SS12E The plans shall be submitted prior to the finalization of the project.
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer
connection permit.
SS22 Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by the Water
Resources Section.
Water Service: Irvin W.D.6
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
10/29/97 WED 15: 27 FAI 509 892 4125 sPORaNE VaLLEY FIRE DEPT 44-~ BUILDING CODES C~ 002
. .
SPOKANE VALLEY FiRE DEPARTMENT
' Spokane County Fire Dlstrict 1 _
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AvE. • SPOKANE. WA 99206-3676 • (509) 928'1700 • fAX (509) 692-4125
R. Po! NumpMes
C?11af
October 28, 1997
FY'unCj.rie Shaw
Departme.nt of Building and Plamning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, wA 99260
RE: Technical Review Meetlng
MHP-4 -9 7
The Spokane Valley Fire Departiaent will requi_reiaent the
installation of a neta fire hydrant at the entrance of the Mobile
Home Park and University.
<
we also will need a to scale drawing ot any gated entrance ro
thfs park. we Will review the gates for clearance, for fire
trucks.
5i; C'Ei aly,
4n:~ Miller
Fire Inspector
KH/ s a
,
,
~
hL ' 1"L0/ Z1 ..,Go y;1 c.`? f ; .r
, ,
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
~ l APPROVAL FOR ZE-3A-79
.
IIII III DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOK:ANE CnU1~ITY
,
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the subject property, the applicant shall
secure the appropriate land division approvals pursuant to RCW 58.17 and/or Section
12.100.110 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
3. The Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall review any proposed
manufactured home park to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of
Approval.
4. A specific and detailed site development plan will be submitted for the Division of Building
and Planning review approval as part of the manufactured home park review and prior to
the issuance of any building permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy.
Appropriate bonds or proof of construction must be submitted at the time of the
manufactured home park review to cover the estimated cost of on-site improvements
which were required as a part of the project approval.
5. The applicant shall develop the property in strict conformance with the site plan submitted
to the Hearing Examiner on December 22, 1997. All aspects of the concept and proposal
shall be binding on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be approved
by the Director of the Division of Building and Planningldesignee, shall only be allowed to
meet regulation standards and conditions of approval. Any other modification must be
presented to the Hearing Examiner for review and approval.
6. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The
Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and
shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [see file] is the subject of a land use action by
a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on December 22, 1997, imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. ZE-3A-79 is available for inspection and copying
in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning.
.
7. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee of
a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permit.
8. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be
submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to
approval of the site development plan for the manufactured home park and prior to the
release of any building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that
sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
9. A six (6)-foot-high concrete, masonry or decorative block wall, or site-obscuring fence
shall be provided and maintained on the north and east property lines of the subject site
consistent with Section 14.622.365 of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
10. Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels
shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee for
compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable local,
state and federal ordinances and development regulations, as amended.
11. The site development plan for the manufactured home park shall indicate all perimeter
boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual in-park spaces
consistent with Section 14.808.040 (2&3) of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as
amended.
12. A filed aviation easement satisfactory to the Spokane International Airport Board, Fairchild
Air Force Base and/or other air traffic control agency shall be provided prior to the Division
of Building and Planning's approval of any manufactured home park site development
plan or building permit.
( ~ ~ i~ U yv` ~
- - 7
t - "vx t~
~
2 ,
C-r
~
~
~
16t&
v
A
~
~
~r
~ -
I ` .
Ii
j
t •
6 ~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
ENGINEER' S CONDITIONS OF A.PPROVAL" _
TO Spokane County Planning Department ~
~
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
~
DATE December 15, 1997
PROJECT: CHG OF COND 22 APT TO 11 UNIT MFG PICKET FENCES
FILE ZE-0003A-79 /
Hearing 12/22/1997 @ 1:30 #1
Review Date @ #
Sponsor/Appllcant WES CROSBY
Section Township Range 09-25-44
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
Technical Review Date (10/30/1997 @ 3 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submltted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1 Applicant shall dedicate 7 feet on University Road for right of way
The applicant shall grant applicable border easements ad3acent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
2 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro]ect which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
CC Applicant WES CROSBY
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
11'~
. e
P ge 2 of 2
12/22/1997 10/30/1997
ZE-0003A-79
5 The County Engineer has designated a 3 Lane Minor Arterial Roadway
Section for the improvement of Universlty Road which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 11-13 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed.
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer.
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer. Al1 work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
10. The County Arterial Road plan identifies University Road as a 100 foot
Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width equaling 20 feet
from centerline is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In
order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
addition to the required right of way dedication, a strlp of property
23 feet in width along the University Road frontage be set aside in
reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Arterial Improvements are made to University Road
11. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility ls responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
° r
i
Page 3 of 3
12/22/1997 10/30/1997
ZE-0003A-79
12. The applicant is advised that the internal road plans for the
manufactured home park will be reviewed by the Division of Engineering
and Roads at the request of the Division of Building and Planning
- 1
acsmbaia, sanay
6-.L. -
From Hemmings, Bill
Sent• Thursday, October 30, 1997 2 23 PM
To. Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat, Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy, Engelhard, Scott, Pederson, John
Subjec4: ZE-3A- Wes Crosby
Importance: High ~ G
r
10-30-97
I received the above referenced proJect application on Oct 20, 1997
he SCS Soils Map identifies this area as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils The soil survey in this area is known
to be accurate Therefore, since this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is
required We have no information that says there are any critical areas on this site
I consider thos proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using the standard drainage condition
ewweoxa,"ga
Page 1
,
.
N07['ICE OF PIJBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COIJN'TY HEARING EXANIINER
'I'O: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU AItE HERIEBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATyON LISTEI) I3ELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No ZE-3A-79/MHP-4-97, Change of Conditions to allow an 11 unit Mobile Home
Park on 1 6 acres
Hearing I)ate and Time: December 22, 1997 1 30 p m
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Pubiic Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Applicant/Owner: Wes Crosby, P 0 Box 13717, Spokane, WA 99213, (509) 926-5229
Address and Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to University Road, approximately 100
feet south of Grace Avenue in the NW '/4 of S 9, T 25 N, R 44 EWM, in Spokane County, Waslltngton
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
Environmental Determmation A Determination ofNonsignificonce was issued by the County Division
of Building and Planning, as the lead agency The official°comment period ends 12-20-97
Reiated Permits: None e
Drvision of Building & Planning Staff: Francine Shaw, (549) 456-3675, ext 218
HEARING EXAMINER PROCEI)URES
Hearing Process and APpeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the heanng The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers A speaker representing each s2de of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
the Hearing E:caminer's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
purstiant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Environmental Determination appeals will follow the
same procedural route as the underlying action All hearings wil) be conducted in facilities which are
accessible to persons with physical disabilitaes
Inspection of I+'iie, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the heanng The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a m and 4 p m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays
Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or
special needs, please call the DTVision at (509) 456-3675 Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn Francrne Sllatv, ZE-
3A-79C & MHP-4-97 Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing
Examiner, 3rd Floor, Public Worlcs Buildina, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260-0245
1)CTERMINA'I'ION OF
NONSIGNITICANCE - "Y)NS"
SPOI{ANE COLJNTY 1)IVYSION OF BUILI)ING ANI) PILANNING
RESPONSIBI.E OFFICIAI,, JAIVIES L. IVIANSON, DIREi CTOit
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FIL.E NUMBER(S) ZE-3A-79/MHP-4-97
I)ESCItIP7'ION OF PROPOSAL Change of Conditions to allow an 11 unit Mobile Home
Park on 1 6 acres in the existing Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone
API'LYCANT/OWNER: Wes Crosby
P O IIox 13717
Spolcane, WA 99213
(509) 926-5229
LOCATION OF PROPOSAY. Generaliy located east of and adjacent to University Road,
approximately 100 feet south of Grace Avenue in the NW '/4 of Section 9, Township 25 N,
Range 44 EWM, in Spolcane County, Washington
LEAI) AGENCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETEI21VIIlVA'TION The lead agency for this p1 oposal has determined that it does not have a
probaUle significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other inforination on file with the lead agency This
information is available to the public on request
This DNS is issued under WAC 197- I 1-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal foi
at least 15 days fiom the date issued (below) Comments reg7rding this DNS anust be
subrnitted no later than 4:00 p.m., I}ecember 20, 1997, if they are intended to alter the
IDNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
By Francine Shaw Title Senior Planner
Plione (509) 456-3675
Address Spolcane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Bi oadway
Spokane, WA 99260
I)A'T1C ISSIJED ~ , 1997 SIGNATIJItE
COMMCN'1S REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT '1I-]E H G
APPEAI., OF THdS DETERNITNATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after tlle
signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and tlle
appellant sliould be prepared to malce specific fachial objections Contact the Divislon of
Building and Planning to assist you with the speclfics for a SEPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
l WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2 Spolcane County Division of Engineering, Pat Harper
3 Spolcane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
4 Spolcane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
5 Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty
6 Spokane County Division of Parlcs, Recreation and Fair, Steve Horobiowski
7 Spolcane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley
8 Spolcane County Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell
9 Spolcane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles
10 Spolcane Transit Authorlty, Christine Fueston
11 WA State Department of Transportation, Marlc Rowher ,
12 Long Range Planning Division, John Mercer e
13 Fire Protection District No 1
14 East Valley School District No 361
15 Irvin Water Dtstrict No 6
~
. ~
r-- r- ~ ~
~
~
r ~ ~'1
1
s`SL"taElil~~
SPOKANE CQ1JN"fY
ncT 131997
uiviSIoi~1 cr r,~;~~~~,r~r, l,ND r~l.AiJNING
,
.
SPOKANE ENVIRONY',`_~NTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 r 1_
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(1NAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
Environmental ChecWist
Purpose of Checklist File No -
The State Environmental Policy Ac! (SEPA) Chapter 43 21C RCW, reqwres all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a
proposal before making decisions An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals sigrnficant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agancy identdy impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid Impacts from the proposal, d it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
Instructions tor Applicants
This environmental checklist asks you to descnbe some basic information about your proposal Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine
whether the envlronmental impacts of your proposal are significant , roquinng preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise
Iniormation known, or gtve the best descdption you can
~
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases , you should be ebla to enswer the quest(ons from
your own observations or projad pians without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer. or ii a questfon does not appfy to your
proposal, wnte "do not knornP or'does not epply ° Complete answers to the questfons now may avoid unnecessary delays later
Some questions ask about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Mswer these questlons H you can If you
have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you
The checkllst questions apply to all parts of your proposai, even If you plan to do them over a pertod of time or on diffarence parcels of land Attach eny
additional information that wfll describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist mey ask you to explafn
your answers or prov(de addfNonal information reasonabty related to determining If there may be s(gnificant adverse impad
Use of checklist for non-project proposals
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered'does not apply ° IN ADDtT10N complete the
SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (Part 0)
For non project actfons, the teferences in the checklist to the words 'proJect; 'applicant,' and 'property or sde° should be read as 'proposal '°proposer,'
and 'affected geographic area; respedively
A BACKGROUND
1 Name cf proposed project, If applicable Chanqe of conditions to original zone change to allow 11 unit
manufactured home park
2 Name of Applicant Wesley C b Susan K Crosby
3 Address and phone number of appi►cant or contact person P 0 Box 13717, Spokane, WW 99213
Telephone 509-926-5229, Mobile 509-994-3922, Fax 926-6292
4 Date Checklist Prepared October 2, 1997
5 Agency requesting checklist Spokane County Department of Building and Planning
6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phesing, If applicable) Const ruct ion, Spring 1978
7 a Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected to this proposal? If yes, explain
No
b Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes. explain
No
8 List any enwronmental information you know about that has been prepared, or wiil be prepared, directly related to this proposal
Site previosly zoned for 22-unit apartment project in 1979 (3-79C) Spokane County will review
a detailed site plan and construction drawings of roads and drainaqe prior to final approval
of manufactured home park dess.gn
Rev 2/1/88 1
!
A BACKGROUND (continued)
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmentai approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your
proposal ityes, explain Spokane County is currently extending sewer lines in University Road
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed tor your proposal, it known
(1) Change of Conditions hearing, Spokane County Hearing Examiner (2) Preliminary
manufactured home park desiqn plan, Spokane county Department of Building and Planning
(3) Drainage plan, Spokane County Engineers office (9) Final plans, Spokane County Department
of Buildinq and Planninq
11 Grve a brief, compiete descnption of your proposal. Including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site (There are several questions
later in this checkilst that ask you to describe certaln aspects of your proposai You do not`need to repeat those answers on this page )
The applicant seeks a change of condition in the current UR-22 zoning to allow future
construction of an 11-Unit manufactured home park, served by a central driveway extending east
from University Road, including utility extension, parking, drainage, and perimeter
landscaping
12 Location ot the proposal Give stgnificant tnformation for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street
address, If any, and section. township and range. If known If a proposal would occur over a ranga of area, provide the range or boundanes of the
site(s) Provide a tegal description, site plan, vlcinity map, and topographic map, If reasonably avadabla While you should submit any plans
reqwred by the agency, you are not reqwred to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application
related to this checklist The site is located on the east side of University Road approximately 200
feet south of Grace Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 9, TWP, 25N R 44 E4M, Spokane,
County, Washington The site exceeds 1 5 acres in size A complete legal description
including maps accompanies the application
13 Does the proposed action lie within the Aqwfer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sawer Service Area? The Pnonty Sewer Service Area
(ASA)? The City of Spokane? (see Spokane County/s ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundanes)
The site is within the ASA, the GSSA, and the PSSA but outside the City of Spokane It is
served by Spokane County sewer system
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
.
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS e Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1 EARTH
a Genoral description of the site (circie one) flat rolling hilly steep slopes, mountamous,
other Flat
b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Less than 2$
c What general types of sods are found on the site (i e, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you
know the ciassification of agricultural so(Is, specfy and note any prime farmland
GgA, Garrison gravely loam, a glacial outwash soil typical of
the floor of the Spokane Valley
d Are there swface indications or history of unstable sods m the immediate vicimtyT If so,
descnbe
No
Rev 2/1/88 2
r
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
e Descnbe the purpose type, and approximate quantities of any fillfng or grading proposad
Indicate source of fiii Minor grading will be required to accommodate
the private lane, utility installations, drainage, and pad
preparation
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, constructton, or use? If so, generally descnbe
Some wind and water erosion could occur durinq excavation and
construction
g About what percent of the site v+nll be covered vAth impervious surfaces aRer project
construction (for example, asphalt or bufldings)
Approximately 50% of the completed site will be covered with
driveways, parking access and manufactured homes
h Proposed measures to reduce or control eroslon, or other impacts to the earth d any I,
An erosion control plan will be provided to Spokane County
prior to construction ~ .c~' r„~4-0-1
c: ~Yic~ r'VlDY~ ~rn~'ni~l S.
~~(24) 7i 1
~
2 AIR
a What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (such as dust, automobile,
odors, industnal, wood smoke) dunng construction and when the project is completed7 If any, -J
generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known °
Some dust may be created during the construction phase of the
project The site is approximately 1 1/2-acres in size
1,~--
b Are there any oNsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so C' ~f-rIc
If so, generally describe
The project is on the edge of an established industrial area qener6 YC-m
J 1C4= SI \P '31 n1J0 I i~
c Propos0d measures to reduce or control emtssions or othar Impacts to the air. If any 2
Conformance to Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority n1~ 1/~'►~~1 ~ ~'y~ ~C- C)/)
requirements
3 WATER
a Surface
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the Immediate vicinity of the site including year round
and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakas, ponds, wetlands? If yes, descnbe rype and provtde
names If appropnate, state what stream or rIver it flows (nto
No The Spokane River is 1/2-mile north of the project
(2) Wdl the project reqwre any work over. In, or adjacent to (wdhin 200 feet) the descnbed
waters? If yes, descnbe and attach avaitable plans
No
Rev 2l1/88 3
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
(3) Estimate the amount oi fill and dredge matenal that would ba placed in or removed from the
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate tha
source of fill matenal
None
(4) Wdl the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? G►ve a general description j
purpose. and approximate quantities, if known ~hP
No A ss.te drainage plan will be prepared for review by the eCrl„ a C~ 'f
Spokane County Engineers Department prior to final approval ~ ~ ~~~1 \ j vi~oll'C
.
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? if so, note location on the site plan
No A0~
(6) Does the proposal Involve an discharge of waste matenals to surface waters? If so, descnba
the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge vja~ No This is a residential proposal served by public sewer
B Ground
(1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or wll water be discharged to groundwaterT Give general
descnption purpose. and approximate quantities d known nrGm
The residential project will be served by a public water
system and a public sewer system .~J
~ ►'~S l C
\I~'1
(2) Describe waste matenal that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other CC)o ('clk)~!
sanitary waste tteatment facility Descnbe the general size ot the system the number of houses l~ ~
to be served (if applicabie), or the number ot persons the system(s) are expected to serve ,/ntn, p, i..
The manufactured home park plan will be provide 11-units tUa7
served by the Spokane County sewer systems ~
(3) Descnbe any systems other than those designed for the disposel of samtary waste, installed
for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surtace (includes systems such as those
for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains) Describe tha typ0 of sysoom the
amount of matenal to be disposed of through the system, and the types of materials likely to be
disposed of (including matenals which may enter the system Inadvertently through spols or as a
resuit of firefighting activdies)
A site drainage plan will be prepared for review by the
Spokane County Engineers office Such plan will conform to
"208" criteria for surface runoff disposal
(4) Wdl any chemicals (especially organtc soivents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above-ground
or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantdies of matenals wdl be stored?
No This is a residential proposal
Rev 2/1/88 4
~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
(5) What protective measures wdl be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or
used on sde will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this inciudes measures to keep
chemicals out of disposal systems descnbed in 3b(2) and 3b(3))?
The applicant will include park rules prohibiting the storage
of dangerous chemicals, explosives, or toxic products
c Water Runoff (including stormwater)
(1) Descnbe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of colledion and disposai if
any (include quantities. ff known) Where wiil this water flov✓t Wdi this water flow into other
wacers? Ir so, ciescnbe J f CcJI ~ lhC~l ~G~ ~
The site is well removed from surface water bodies and
does not have any defined drainage channels All drainage from will
c~l✓ ~
the site will be confined to the site in accordance with an
C~Ir-J
approved drainage plan ~
(2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled, or used on the sde in a location where a spol or leak 'y ~~CU
wdl drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater dlsposal system discharging to surface or 1
groundwaterl /l
No This is a residential pro3ect connected to a public sewer l~
system -,z- 1~1Y1~~7'lr~~
c5c
(3) Could waste matenals enter ground or surfaca waters? If so. generaliy describe v.l _
No ~ '
1'~UV~(w;~P~ Qll
-7~ 7
d Proposed measures to teduce or control surface, ground, and runoB water impacts, if any (if the
proposed action lies within the Aqwfer Sensitrve Area be especially clear on explanations relating
to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist)
A drainage plan will be developed for the site conforming to
"208" requirements The units in the project will be connected
to the Spokane County sewer system
4 PLANTS
a Circle type of vegetation found on the site
deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
x grass
X pasture
crop or grain
wet sod plants, cattad, buttercup, bulirush, skink cabbage, other
water plants water ldly, eelgrass, mdfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b What k(nd and amount of vegetation wlil be removed or altered
Most of the vegetation will be removed from the site to C-~J
accommodate roadways, parking, pad sites, and landscapinq
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site J~~~- Ica r- ~ \
None are known per Spokane County Date Atlas,1981
d Proposed landscapmg, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation
l
on the site, d any
None The site is in an urban area
`I I 1
Rev 2/1/88 5
c~1~~~~~~
.~--r
4
~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Onty
5 ANIMALS
a Circte any birds and arnmals which have been observed on or near the sde or are known to be on
or near the site
blyds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
mammats deer, bear, elk, beaver, other small mammals
fish bass, salmon, trout, hemng, shellfish, other
other
b List any threatened or endangered species knovm to be on or near the sde
None are known per Spokane County Data Atlas, 1981 ~ .J/
~-~~-r► (C ~ ~l
c Is the srte part ot a migration route? It so, explaln /1 I C ~5'l r~ /U
No The site has arterials and railroad lines to the north, v`
arterials, railroads, and freeway to the south.
d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if eny
None The project is within an urbanized area
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
projecYs energy needs? Descnbe whother it will be used for heating. manufactunng, etc
Electricity and natural gas will be used for liqhtinq, \ l v~.J`' l~_,
mechnical operation, and space heating J u~~C~ ~ C-~
b Would your project aHect the potential uss of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally ~j~..
descnbe Jf~
No The manufactured homes will be one-story in height and set
back 10 feet from adJoining properties
c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans ot this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any
Manufactured homes will be of new construction conforming to
adopted industry codes and standards
e
0
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any environmental health hazards, includfng exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of Bre and
explosion, splll, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe
No This is a residential project
(1) Descnbe special emergency services that might be reqwred
None This is a residential project
~
Rev 2/1/88 6
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation tor
Agency Use Only
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, d any
None This is a residential project
b Nolse
(1) What types of noise exist in fhe area whtch may affect your project (for example traffic.
equipment operation, other?
The site adjoins an industrial area with noise from fans,
compressors, and equipment operation The site is also less
than 1/9-mile from the BNSF railroad main line In ~
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project ol I a shon- `~'Y~~L~~~~ ' ~~L t IC~~✓
term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other) Indicate what
~
hours noise would come from the sde
Some noise will be created during construction activites
When the project is completed, noise levels will conform to
residential area norms
(3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, d any
Construction activities will be confined to daylight hours
Construction equipment will be equipped with mufflers and
warning devices
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a What is the current use of the site and adjacent propertles? The site is vacant
north single family, east vacant, south industrial, west h c~~ ~'x~~ SCjU lh p~
residential/industrial C~G Y~~~~~~
b Has the site been used for a nculture7 If so, describe Yes The site was used
9 1,Cvr~~
as a pasture ~ ` ~
c Descnbe any structures on the stte None
d Wdl any stnuctures be demolished'T If so, which7 No
e What are the current zornng ciassificatlons of the sde UR-22
f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site
Urban Bordered by Industrial to the west
g If appllcable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site
Not Applicable
h Has any part oi the site been classified as an °environmentally sensitive areaT If so, speciy r
rro c_-►'15 iAe '
X S~ 1 %
A
I Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Approximately 25 people would live in the completed
manufactured home park
Rev 2/1/88 7
~
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Onty
j Approximately how many people wouid the complete project displace? None
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any None
i Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, ifany The project will have perimeter landscapinq
and setbacks from adjoining properties and from University I oy'~G r hf
Road
~'71 l_.i ~ I i ~ ~ l~-~' ~i
e )
~ ~ ~
9 HOUSING nf
a Approximately how many units would be prowded, ii any? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or
low-income housing
Eleven middle-income housing units will be provided
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-or
low-Income housing
None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts if eny
None The manufactured home park will provide a needed
inventory of affordable housing
10 AESTHETICS
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the
pnncipal extenor bwlding matenal(s) proposed?
\ L~J ~}-'rn'^` ((-"2 11 Ce `u
( ~J
Manufactured homes will,be confzned to one-story in height ~I--~-Zcne
I n
~ I'Y) Gn-n l S ~
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be aitered or obstructed? t
None The site is located between an established industrial 7
area and a single-family housing area
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any
Perimeter landscaping and fencinq will be installed
11 LIGHT ANO GLARE
a What type of tight or glare wltl the propasal produce? What time of day wouid it mainly occui'T
Residential lighting standards will be used
b Could light or glare from the finished product be a safety hazard or interfere with vfews?
No
c What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal7
Adjacent industrial areas maintain security lighting around
. '6 ( P
bu u~ ~
zlding perimeters W`I ) i_~ - ~e
d Proposal measures to reduce or control hght and glare impacls, if any ~ r)None Residential lighting standards will be used
~ .
c
6V-cA
,
Rev 2/1l88 8 f 1'1' ricjy-U(`\ `\1)e
Y,
~ r. ti ~Y'~%' ~ lr1 ,r7(
~r'r`'
e
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Oniy
12 RECREATION °
e
a What designated and informal recreational opporturntles are in the lmmed~ate vicinity/1
Valley Mission Park is located approximately 1 mile southeast
of the project
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, descnbe
No
c Proposed measures to reduce or controt impacts on recreation including recreational
opportunlties to be provPded by the projoct or applicant. it any `
Each manufactured home pad will have adjacent lawn and
landscaped areas
13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects Ilsted on or proposed for natlonal, state, or Ixal preservation
registe►s knovm to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descnbe \ l~No The Mullen Trail may have passed near the site n•I
~o po ~
7
b Generally descnbe any landmarks or evidence of histonc archaeotogical scfent►fic or cultural )bI
importance known to be on or next to the site ,q ~
1 C~l
None are known per Spokane County Data Atlas, 1981 ~
rce~ ~
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any
If artifacts are dzscovered during construction, the Spokane
County Historic Preservation office will be notified per
county code
14 TRANSPORTATION
a Identity public streets and highways serving the site and describe propased access to the
existing street system Show onsrte plans, d any
University Road is listed as a principal arterial without
controlled access in the County Arterial plan
b Is site currently served by public transit? I( not what is the epprowmate distance to the nearest
transit stop? 6_1
Spokane Transit authority provides service in Trent Avenue rA 1/ 9-mi le nor t h as we l l as Par k an d Ri de facility at
c Montgomery and Pines
How many parktng spaces would lhe completed project have? How many would the project V)
eliminate't ~
The completed manufactured home park will house apprvximately
25 off-street parking spaces
d Wdl the proposal require any new roads or streets, or lmprovements to existing roads or streets
not including driveways? !f so, generaUy describe Qndicate whether public or pnvate)
A private lane extendZng east from University Road will
access each of the manufactured home unlts
e
Will the project use (or occur in the Immediate vicinity oQ water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generaliy descnbe
The project is 1/9-mile south of BNSF railroad This is a
residential project and will not use water, rail, or air
transportation services Rev 2/1/86 9
t
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
f How many vehicutar trips per day woutd be generated by the completod prolect? If knawn,
indicate when peak would xcur
Rpproximately 55 to 60 vehicular trips per day will be added
to University Road frocn the 11 manufactured home units with
limited impact on peak hour traffice The apartment project
of 22 units would have provided about 150 trips to the
systems
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any
The access to the park will include a taper at the entry
road to improve traffic safety
~
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the proJed result in an increased need for public service (for example fire protection
police protection, health care schoois, other)? If so generally descnbe
The project will create incremental demands on police, fire
protection and schools, which will be partially offset
by increasad tax revenue
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public servicese if any
Rppropriate signage and acldressinq of manufactured home
units
16 UTILITtES
a CIr tddies vaflable at the site aturai a te~fuse service5
telepho793 nltary seweF~epiic system, other
b Descnbe the utdities that are proposed for the project, the utllity provlding the service and the
general constructlon actrvities on the site or ln the immediate vicinity which might be needed
Water and Sewer-City of Spokane
Electricity and natural gas, WWP, telephone US West, Water,
Irvin Water District, sewer, Spokane County Utilities
Department, refuse, Valley Garbage
C SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of parjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge I also understand
that, should there by any wQlful mfsrepresentatfon ol wilifui lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determinatIon of
nonsignificance that ft might issue in reHance uport this checklist
Date October 3, 1997 PropOent Na e(prin v C. Crosbv
Proponent Signature ,O Address PO Box 13717
City/State2ip Sookane_ Washinaton 99213-~ Phone (509) 327-8697
Person Completing Form John D Konen. David Evans and Associetes. Inc Date October 3, 1997
FOR STAFF USE ONLY.
Staff member(s) reviewing checkiist
Based on thts staff review of the environmental checklist and other pert(nent i ormation the staff
A ~!~oncludes that there are no probabla slgrnficant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsigrnficance
B Concludes that probable significant environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated
determtnatfon of nonsignificance with conditions
C Concludes lhat there are probabie slgnificant adverse environmental impacts and recommends determination of significance
Fding Fee $75 00
Rev 2/1/88 10
Y
S:?OXANE COUNTY D ViSION OF
13U~L31NG AND PLANNING, i:-uEIi/CD
~ P0~1"ANE CnUN9TY
CHANGE oF Co~~ITIoNs FoR A O(;T 13 1997
PRE vIoUSLY APPROVE D ZoNE cHANGE
r?! I1;,lGP4 Date Application No
Name Or" Applicant/Representative --LJeS ley ~odeU S RL/
r - ~
Mailmg Address ~ 0, EeK /',3 7/7
City Si~e2p State Zip 21 v
Phone 9 -;?-6.-SZ7-9' (Worl.//jdXA
Existing Zone Classification GCQ- ZZ-
Date Existing Zone Classification Established
Legal Description of Property Eee
~
Section ~ Township 'Z ~ Range
Source of Legal
Parcel No -Z,~o-- 97 ~9~%z• 07 ~9 ~o rSYZ ~0'7So~ 079/ )
~
PROPOSEI) CHANGE OI+' CONDITIO1VS
Reference specif c"Condition(s)" of original approval (Cite the applicable condition from the
Findings and Order of the Hearing Exam.iner Commtttee's public hearing)
.
Give detailed explanation of request for change in status uf tlle proposal
i-o (n Z A
.
GC A!/ 7- ~7.~,a/U'1 `'~t''7'~vt.Qi~~ /{7rY~'t-t•P.~ ~~~N~ll
dbe p- /9 S
If development of the site will be changed substantially by this request, or the property has
boundaries different than originally proposed, a revised development Plan must be subnutted
68ignatu- of~ ca r Agent Address if difFerent than Applicant
Rev 1 /96, sam
MetroScan Full Legal APN:45092 0779
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLK 93&94 BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 93 TH N30FT TH
E139 29FT TH N90FT TH W139 27FT TO W LN BLK 93 TH S TO POB
r
, NletroScan Full Legal APN:45092 0780
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLK 93&44 BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N ALG W LN
~ 120FT TH E139 27FT TH N59 97FT TH W51 11 TH N30 02FT T H W88 15FT TO
W LN OF BLK 43 TH S90FT TO POB .
a
0 MetroScan Full Legal APN:45092 0791
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLKS 43&49&45 DAF, BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N30'
' TH E139 29' TH N149 97' TH E13 89' TH S20' T H E TO E LN OF BLK 45 TH
5159 92' TH W TO W LN OF BLK 93 THE POB
~ 1 •'-~~ay9.. ~L:+fi'.~'~'1'~~
. V zU88750555 P42
.4 iF 46~-. *4-- c tz ~ P
10; 07/1997 I9: b5 15099249726 TQMLINSON BLACI< UAL PAGE 01
s
0
MetroSeen Full Legiii, APNs45092 0779
. . J.._..__ ..:,R,:__.. -
FAIRacRE9 PTN 0r AY,K 43&44 890 AT Sw cOR 0r BLK 43 TN N30Fr TH
E299.29FT R'R NOOF'T TH W139.27FT TO W LN 8LK 43 TH S TO POB
--T-O 4 ev'4 l,.t! t 7-14-
~'~~1
. . . . ~~5450~ 0780
.r_ ' . . . - . _ . . " - ' - - -
rAYRACRtB PTN OF gLYt 43 644 8EG AT 9w COR os BY.K 43 TH N AtG w LN
120F'T TH €139. 27FT TX N39. 57F? TH W51.11 'PH N30 . 02FT T H W88 .15FT TO
W Y.N AF BLK 13 ?X S90F? TO POB
~ E T-;+ EvZ LJCI t *r
~
~
MelY agan, ..Fa1l Leml _ . APNe49092 r0791_ _ . , .
8'AYYaACRES PTN 0F BLKS 43&49643 DAF'1 DZG A'P SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N30'
Tk 2199. Z9' ,TM N149.971 TX €2 3. 8 9' TH 320' R` HE TQ C I.N 08` BLK 45 TH
$139. 92' R'bl,W T8 W LN 4r BLK 43 THE P8D
~
tf~rr... . .
~
Q ~
~
t
or ` :
~
Al - ~ A Gjg~°Z'"
~KANE: COt1NTY
O(;T 1 31991
OlVl:,ltJhj U Q)"u 11 3 Q'10 FJLANNING
m ~
zE --,3A`"1 CI
.
PAGE 1 08 11 30 21 OCT 1997
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
05012 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00.000 DISHMAN-MICA RD & SC U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY RD 00 030 35TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 130 3 3 RD AV ( S TART RA U 14 PAVED 54
00.220 32ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00 280 31ST AV U 14 PAVED 54
00 340 30TH AV (STAR.T) U 14 PAVED 54
00 390 RAYMOND CL (END) U 14 PAVED 54
00 400 29TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 470 28TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00 530 27TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
00.590 26TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 650 25TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 730 24TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 780 23RD AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 840 22ND AV U 14 PAVED 54
00 920 21ST AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
00 970 2 0 TH AV ( S TART ) U 14 PAVED 54
01 030 19TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01 090 18 TH AV ( S TART ) U 14 PAVED 54
01 220 16TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01.290 15TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY (START) Ol 300 15TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
UNIVERSITY RD 01 350 14TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
01.420 13 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
Ol 470 12TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01 520 11TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
Ol 580 lOTH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 54
Ol 600 lOTH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01 660 9TH AV U 14 PAVED 54
Ol 740 STH AV U 14 PAVED 54
01 790 7TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01 820 6 TH AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 54
01.840 6TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 54
01 980 4TH AV U 14 PAVED 80
02.060 3RD AVE (STAR.T) U 14 PAVED SO
02.230 SPR.AGUE AV U 14 PAVED 68
02.300 RIVERSIDE AV (STAR.T) U 14 PAVED 52
02 360 MAIN AV U 14 PAVED 52
02 440 NIXON LN (PRIVATE RD U 14 PAVED 20
02.480 VALLEYWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02.630 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 14 PAVED 20
02 650 SPRINGFIELD AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
02 730 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 20
02 980 BOONE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03.020 SHARP AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03 070 SINTO AV (END) U 14 PAVED 20
03 130 MAXWELL AV (START) U 14 PAVED 20
03 140 MAXWELL AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 20
03.240 MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 20
03 310 AUGUSTA AV & CT (STA U 19 GRAVEL 22
03.370 NOR.A AV (START) U 19 PAVED 32
UNIVERSITY RD (END) 03.390 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 32
05013 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00 000 SOUTH END TO MONTGOM U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD 00 170 MONTGOMERY U 16 PAVED 20
00 300 BUCKEYE AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20
00.370 GR.ACE AV ( START ) U 16 PAVED 20
PAGE 2 08 11.31 21 OCT 1997
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info .
UNIVERSITY RD (END) 00.440 FAIRVIEW AVE (START) U 16 PAVED 20
UNIVERSITY RD 00.480 R.AILROAD CROSSING
00.510 SR 290
05023 UNIVERSITY RD (START 00 000 44TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
UNIVERSITY RD 00 060 DARCY DRIVE (START) U 19 PAVED 40
00 210 PONDR.A DR ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40
3 Records Processed
PAGE 1 ~ 6 08.11 53 21 OCT 1997
Road# Road Names . . . MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info .
00342 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00 000 HAVANA ST U 19 GR.AVEL 26
BUCKEYE AV 00 250 CUSTER RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 26
00 380 CHRONICLE RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 26
00.500 CARNAHAN RD (START) U 19 GR.AVEL 26
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00 560 UPRIVER DR (END) U 19 GR.AVEL 26
00343 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00 000 PARK RD U 17 PAVED 18
BUCKEYE AV 00.120 CENTER RD U 17 PAVED 18
00 240 ELLA RD U 17 PAVED 18
00 360 DICK RD U 17 PAVED 18
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00.490 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 18
00345 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00.000 BARKER RD R 09 PAVED 26
BUCKEYE AV 00 040 MARLIN DR (STAR.T) R 09 PAVED 26
00.100 JOEL RD (START) R 09 PAVED 26
00 140 HARMONY ST (END) R 09 PAVED 26
00.250 MCMILLAN RD (END) R 09 PAVED 28
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00.740 MEYERS RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 20
00404 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00 000 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 40
BUCKEYE AV 00 160 WILBUR RD U 19 PAVED 40
00 320 PERRINE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00 500 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 40
00475 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00 000 WEST END TO WOODWARD U 19 PAVED 36
BUCKEYE AV 00 050 WOODWARD AV (END) U 19 PAVED 36
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00 120 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 28
00344 BUCKEYE AV (START) 00 000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 GRAVEL 08
BUCKEYE AV (END) 00.150 UNIVERSITY RD
6 Records Processed
y ~ k
l
,
I 11, C-J 1-7 C7
- - _ .i~ ~ - -
I )IL'IS}tnJ ()l- fr: mm 12(1.11)5 ~ /1 D14'V;It11f [rl I111° P111111f' I V'[)IdVS I)IA`/1f21Ail°1!1
Wiliiam A. JrsliRSS, C'omify Firgii11-1 11I'e4rsi5 T,(. +rlt, i' F", 11ilrr•loi
3I'A4' l+`I+.J!{J~
NUnrBxt.ti ~ ~t
ENc'1~rnrrrR's MxtR~{r, • >n~~~NT
'l'liis agreeuicnt bec4veen Spokalic ('ounly ancf 0~'~~ ,
w}inse irlterest in [ltie project is go rt-boiGe,'
is erYtereci iritn Iiiis ?(:9 clay of 19 -~7-.Tllis nbrecmcnt is i-willicahle tf~ tlie w-c7ject
knowyi as: A 4-vu-T r~.,•Y~~s ~-~.r_ ~1•:.~~ r~-~,,QS, ~_J~
(prinj"C amiru -ntmmrien m~e~ 1
L
/
Thai the inclivicllfals anci parties named liereiii as har7mg ari iiiterest in liic ahove describecl propea-ty c3r proJect agree
to (lie foflowiitig:
1, Reimhurse Spci3carie [:'oiinty f(►~- p;ojc:ct review atl in5pec:lytyn fets ,is Sp»:ciliccl ill C'itdil)tc:t' 9. 1-1 of
llie Spcakane Cotjiity Cotfe. `f'[ic fces wil1 be t}ased oti aetual sal<1ry cosls incurred by Spokan,
Counly for project revlews anci I of tnsperlions p1sfs a tetl (ic:1'cetit aciministrative c:ltiarge, at7ci t\°i
be biiled tttuii[Itily as acci-uec1. IStiy hiilin,~ amnmrts cftle, ijiclticliil~ any expeiises inctirrecl in ilA
cnltectiaii af aii overeitie accc3unt, iittist he paid prinr to lltie C'omnty's accelitaiice of tlEe project fL,
filijig. !f aprojcct is approved andlor fileci wifh a balance sialf owiitg, fllc itrlp4licl b4alat►ce sliail l,c
paic! wifliiri 3[) c!a}rS (}f IfIt Ifli{{IEC;e datc.
`T'ltie tiittlersibnecl t3grees 11iat tliese fees are cltie ancl payabie I:iuum t-eceipt of llie billiaag as specific:cl
C]Ve.
_i. Aitiy ittivoices not paid williiit 30 thys of t11e invc~icc dale wil1 bc C:{i[l`i1ilC:l'Cd clelinclueW. If 7riy
oufstanding bala~~~e on Ilie acucr>>ni Cor iffis prfaject is tiot paid witliin _30 clays of t1te invoice clale,
rio fiitlliet- reviews of (lie project rlocuments wiil he c:«ii(llicte(l tala(if ilic eiitire acc«►iiit baiance is
paicl. ArYy balaiice oii tlie accumxi for this pioject not paid withiiti 65 clatys. cif iIic: invoice clate niay
r-estilt in legal actiun or ihe iniiiatitiri of otlrer colleclian prracedures, ir1c1titling referral to a
collectioil agency. ,l'lie Sponsor Nvil1 hc; liable fr►t~ any anc) aI1 exlier~ses lnuirrccl by (lie ('ouiity for
(lie collec'iicati of overdtle ac:coll€f[s.
4. '111c mnazih,y billang shnulcl be r;eni 11r tlw, '111volic3iti 1)1:
N Aty 1[?: 01 l •
116 i )1) ft [ {S5:
.
CI I' `f' , SI AI I - - - .
~ , - -
Ili' ['()i)1y: ~.1~~ . -
tyr iONt: -S-2- -2-_7
i uurlerstantl Ilra( failtitt-e (o p,ty t(tCse,' fr:CS cts~llt ili dd,'I)f iit c0E11I)lLAisf~I Mr apilcm"+i of 1ht: projeci or oIlter
possible sancti«ns.
f-1 If liiis fec agr~eel»ealf is compl~ted by "mr~lcom olhcr 111ail i1ae 5poil5m (i.e., tlae project Mvnti, M' a
pi`lllClpill in (lie f-iiRti sprynsurirtg (lie pru,jec:t), SIiL'ti as (lie Ul1gfClC'C`.1" tleS1,€;;IltC16 liie Iii-oject, tlreit
writteri aulhorization froin (lie Spurtisc3r sperific7lly €+titlimizin6 Ilie E1geti# lo exectile titis Fec
Agrceiii+eiit is attacliec! (c) iliis Fee Agieciiic
SIGIVA"I`Utii: 13y: -46
,~.f~'''~S/~ _ -
(Pt~~NT rtAN rr)
k-7!'-Odl[.!!.-3E- COU1.]Ti'. FIi-7(AtlV!5RS
klslflagiccfceAoc 111/96
1026 IV 13ro:lrt►vay Ai,c 5'E}oMtzi[tc SYA 99260-0170 (509) -1-56-:1600 F;'1 : (5wl9) .12 1 _~-~-1f3 `I N M: (50't) 32•1-3! 66
r
,t
S Y~ v K
BUILDING AND PI.ANNWG • A DIViSTON OF TI lf I'I_lltl [C ~ti~t ~l:hti [)f.l':11:1 ~lf:~~ I
JAtilrs L. MANsc~rv, C.B.O., Dir:rcroR DcN:v►s M. Scorr, P.f:., vir.FC rOR
MEMORANDUM RECEIVEV'
TO• . Spokane County Division of Engineering, • Pat HarPer OCT 2 0
199 Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Halderby &TWCOUIVTYENG!~~,.::
Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fa ► i . ~ . c 1 d V
Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
Development Engineering Services; Bill i 1:: i 1 i 11111 , ,
Department of Transportation, Mark Rowher
Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen N 1'Spokane Transit Alithority; Christine FuestoTi
Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
Long Range Planning Division; John Merccr
East Valley School District No. 36 1
Fire District No. 1
Irvin Water District No. 6
City of Millwood Planning llepartmen?: llcitl1cr ('~inno>1
i+ROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner 1f,""
llATC: October 20, 1997
RE: Change of Conditiuns tor ZL-3A-79 and Nlubile l lome I'arl: l'()r
MI-IP-4-97
TI:CHNICAL JZCVIEW MCETING
OCTOBER 30, 1997 AT 3:15 P.M.
DIVISION OT BUILDING AND PLANNING 15` FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
I'lease review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to
attend tliis meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this
meeting. If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review commew~,
on the attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECHN[CAL REVIEW FORMS
will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building an,'.
Planning file. Thanks for your cooperation
application, please contact me at 456-3675.
NOTE: The Division of Building & Planning will now bc circulatiug comments for 5L1'A
Checltlist at the time of tecliiiical review. Tftis will be the nirly time yoii will be
able to commeiit regai•ding tlie SEPA Checlclist for tliis project.
c: Wes Crosby, P.O. Box 13717, Spokane, WA. 99213
Attaehments: Teclinical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, SEPA Cliecklist
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVEIVUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
PHoNr:: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
TDD: (509) 324-3166
r
Spolcane County
Division of Buildflng Sz Fianning
, TechnicaI Review IVlceting
Meeting Date and Time October 30, 1997 @ 3 15 p m
Project Fite No ZE-3A-79 and MHP-4-97
Pioject Location Generally loeated east of and adjacent to University Road,
approximately 1 04 feet south of Grace Avenue in the NW '/4 of Section 9, To,vvnship 25 N, Range 44 EWM, in Spokane Catinty, Washington '
Comprehensive Plan Urban
Project Description Change of Conditions for ZE-3A=79 and Mobile Home I'aik
for 1VIHP-4-97
Parcel No(s) 45092 0780, 0779, 0791
;
ApplicantlOwner Wes Crosby, P O Box 13717, Spokane, VJA 99213, (509)
'
926-5229
Project Planner 1=rancrne Shaw ;
a , ~ o
S]rV`0XANE COUNTY DIV:Sli~~ OF
113UILDING AND PLANNING ,1.UEIvED
~E ~r,d~f'~~~E CUU~~~'Y
CI-IANGE OF COND][TgONS FOR A Ot;T 1 31991
PRE VIOUSL'Y APPItOVED ZONE CHANGE
~1 ~ U1 ►a F „b~ PUNNING
Date Application No 7
Name O-L-Applicant/Representative -LJeS ley 0 0&0,)5RL/
r ~
Mailing Address ~ 0, oex /,3 7/7
City State Zip
v
Phone (Worl.,yaXA
Existing Zone Classification GCQ- 2-72
Date Existing Zone Classification Established
Legal DescripUon of Property S'ee &25!~,("
Section ~ Township .1, - ~ Range ~ y
Source of Legal Oc.
Parcel No -Zlo- 97 ~aqs~iz, 07 79 1o9SYz ~079,0/ C)"!-rz''Z , 0'79/
<
PItOPOSED CIIANGE OI' COIVDITIONS
Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval (Cite the applicable conditlon from the
Finciings and Order of the Heanng Exarruner Committee's public heanng)
Give deta.iled explanation of request for change in status of the proposal
`P- (_,ey 5,~, Ze- ~O i~Ll~r Z Z- Aget&e AP t ~J
.
!.C Aul'/
SOM ~ r-7F~~/J ~ ~ I S '~4 ~,~i,~~,,, ~
~UU
If development of the slte will be changed substantially by this request, or the property has
boundarles different than originally proposed, a revised development plan must be subrrutted
i
~Signalu,Wof Ap-p11ca r Asent Addiess if diffeient thln Applicant
Rev 1/96, sam
~
~
MetroSean Fuil Legal APN:45092 0779
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLK 93&49 BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N30FT TH
E139 29FT TH N90FT TH W139 27FT TO W LN BLK 93 TH S TO POB
~
MetroScan Full Legal APN:45092 0780
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLK 43&94 BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N ALG W LN
120FT TH E139 27FT TH N59 97FT TH W5~1 11 TH N30 02FT T H W88 15FT TO
W LN OF BLK 43 TH S90FT TO POB
,b
~
~ MetroScan Full Legal APN:45092 0791
FAIRACRES PTN OF BLKS 93&49&45 DAF, BEG AT SW COR OF BLK 43 TH N30'
TH E139 29' TH N149 97' TH E13 89' TH S20' T H E TO E LN OF BLK 45 TH
S159 92' TH W TO W LN OF BLK 43 THE POB
, ~ • . » ;k2~~,~'~3~,k~
cc ,rr~
tU88750555 P02
,
lc*-a c I a Al
10; 07/1997 19: 55 15099249728 TOMLINSON BLACi< UAL F'AGE 01
APfif o45092 0779
F1iSRACRE9 PTN 0r BLK 43644 BEG AT SW COR 0F BLK 43 TH N30F'T TH
E239.29FT TX NOOrT ?x W139.27Ft° T0 w LN SLK 43 TH S TO POB
w r. 7'74-
MetroPean Ful➢ LaRal_ A-PNo45092 0780
P'AYRACREB PTN 0r BLK 43644 HEG AT 9W COR OF BLK 43 TH NALG W LN
120FT TH EI39.27FT TH N59. 37F't TH W51. 11 TH N30 . 02FT T H WB8 15FT TO
W LN OF BLK 43 TX 590E"T TO p08
~ G= E 7`4 Er2 uU t T~ l~
~
Metff'dDgmn FolQ LCgal APNo45. O9Z 0791
.
FAZRACRL3 PTtJ Qr BLKS 43&44643 DAEJ BEG AT S9rT COR OF BLK 43 TH N30 f Y
TH Z139. Z9',,T!{ N149. 97° TH E13. 89' TH 820' HE TO C bN OF' BLK 45 TH "
$I g9.92' R'k,,~1 fi0 W LA1 0~' BLK 43 THE P0D ~
_
/f,IrM.. •
~ 4b f,.., ~
w
i
L
~ ~
~ IVEJ
~r'~~K"ANE C:O~J~~ sy
OCr 1 .31991
"W;.IU{`i t.o ' ,I1'..~ I«~, ri ~1) PL;;Ni~ING
m
ZE -
~ ~ Cj ~
p ~ S 7qjm"?,4.-q7
~a`
_
e ~
.
~ r--"
~ _ .
- f°f I
~
-
/
V E
~ ~ ~ rn
. ~ ,
~ -
. ~
~ ~~i • y
" ft~i
I 1 '
~ .
~
90
!
f{ R v = ~
~,1
a I
i
g , J ' 3
, 1 -
' ~ , e 1 ► ~t ~
iF Bu~KEY~ ~ ~ i
, .s
1 ~ U cv`
~
'pLKs e
r 0 a
l.tOh76Q►AEpY '~kl94d~-^'
,b N Y pC C) Q
W
~ ~ ~ J~ ~ r ~ •
C0~
t
1969 ¢ p 1
, ~ 'p k
~S~C3~NAN~ Lc L L
iIvT ~RM.1710N,.+►1 RY,. •
~
~ z ^
w,.' W ~ ~ ~
~-o
~
~
i
,
v ~ ma.r t ~r~,
~ ~v,/~ s~ ,t t e~~z • tor yrw mFr ~
f ~y~~ ~ ? e. ~r ~ ~ 71 _ _ • - • I2A ~ 67fb oKw Si.r„
40
_ i sRORNfMtC
K-~
`VlCINfTY MA _
o0%^.
N
V ►r r ~ot ~5 I Ilf S afvw~~ le.~ U lL 't fP. ~r
~Mdo vivo -sJ
~ u~d\
i~ i..,r~ oe WsnlNro ~Y;p,F~'~ ~C 9r~ re►
too f' ~I r AOAu
OW~1Y bwTf* EaCM Lo7 ROAOW1IY
' `GaACE I LOT Y
~
+ AvE ~or r,
.
S J ~ „
7YAlCIAL LOr-DLVELOOMPkfJ 44dkL / Q=o
~
~ 65 TONINB bf ~ $ q~
zao w!I ~r ~ dt~~ . ~
P✓ , sa ' , ~ I, " . . . ,i;'~
,+r ~i~''i'
0 ~~~~t p Q~~`+~ I n :eNeo aitL
Y !,1
`J h:'- y 0~4 f E,cp r
N
~
f~~1 ~l so i__~~b___-~___-__~ •~s------*t .'1__.____~..___ `i7df
0 X- ~ , ~ + ~ ~c , '
Ppovr~~~- Eut~[eLl~ro ~re oxIaL
P Q~~o~'~ o e t r A: ~
~ ~
Qv'C~yi6~ y~~ .-.1 +.,0 - -a - - ~ - - s/ Ieo f -4-
ip~a t S~,,A~'~~ ; r- so --qg- q~- Yg . _ y~r Y8 y9 e
~~i ~ ~ I Zd~iaa Nl 7 S
3 ~ ;~~►i 0 @0 90 o 0 o c o,
t r-
4
YONLO Yf 3 l I
- - - Q~ - - - - - - - - - - -
38J e
7[ -',1.'7~/
DATA ~L.?J ~dL*~-^°e'.,~ • o !
.
2nN+N6 l2 "
~A 2 2 l..a zz ~ ~ o,..~ P/CKET FEIVCES A'
aW... r.r •..n.N ,5~.1~~1S1I1'
-,Act~r A.drLtaGSaiL&l1 e.)Lt~~~ x~A
t 4.! Yst Q• g.~~, MRNtaCmsfe 1#0f PA1~'k SITE PIAN
l&u;twPCO AYfAShcyMg~ ln.wJte,~uf~~ IYoI - 54~1!/otf Vas((tir (-uSAN f lAO.Of OF RECORD
IY~~ ~ L.«~t•/ZA~L~y~P31iL~.~yLL1L..SCL1Ei..t
Ail Orht1 . ep iUJf t it/IfAl YA40 I w414-r
MaNUFAcruaeo N...aL~er.rHo 3v.~~. r t~~~nr vo~ Ko~c .T S/TE PLAN - ze-3 79
IIOME VA4R let rvr dnla.,,~ i-.o.. . u- SY9
rw /'e 30 0 ~o a..w~rC~
SvaCES 9liLDirv(' -ir9Arf A...r%•dn 75 01 ..t6r,4/M# vo.0rtAt01ry vey~L,~.,,~ P~~ 01 9I97
Qint IA~-#) 11 N~.. a..J.ro...~ rt w_;~•~ Ll t1 Za 47
C u- 1'A~q li_infY10 E5 1r eyfrl d77D/00f1Ve aite/nVlY: A79J
f SL u a__ ~r.. J.• tiC 9~ ec~..~ SJ. Cf .Y o.-.awr
dLL 4