ZE-28-93
SPOKANE COUNTY
, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
]FIN Ij~ NG~ nF FACT. CONCLUSIONS AND nRDE$
INTRODUCTION
This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Cornrnittee on August 19, 1993.
The members of the Committee present are Harry Gibbons, Chauperson, Jan Reuter
and Lunell Hau ght.
PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Dwight Hume, requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, File No.
ZE-28-93, from Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Community Business (B-2)
withi-n the Aquifer Sensidve Area Overlay Zone (ASA)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The property is generally located south of and adjacent to Valley Way, approximately
250 East of Sullivan Road in the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N.,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
2. The committee adopts the Planning Deparnnent Report as a part of this record.
3. The existing land uses in the area are residential and commercial.
4. The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses in the area.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category is for the
purpose of developing a"city-like" environment with various uses including
residential and neighborhood business.
6. The proposed zoning does not implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan.
7. 1'he Arterial Road Plan designates Valley Way as a Collector Arterial, with a
recommended right of way width of 70 feet.
8. The existing zoni.ng of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-
3.5 (IJR-3.5), previously established as Agricultural zoning in 1942 and reclassified
to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code.
9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C ('I'he State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Detennination of Nonsignificance was issued. T'he Committee,
after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS.
10. The legal requirement's for public notice have been fulfilled.
11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use.
i
8/93 HEC Order for Z-oz-8-93 ' Page 2~
~
12. The applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since
the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassificarion is
not justified.
13. The proposed use wi.ll be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare
especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies.
t
.
,
,
~ ' 8/93 HEC Order for Z-28-93 ` Page 3
- ' ,
nRDER-
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion, DENIES the application of Dwight Hume for the Zone Reclassification
as described in the application ZE-28-93.
j Motion by: Jan Reuter Seconded by: Lunell Haught
,
Vote: (3-0) UNANIlVIOUS TO DENY THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO COMMUNTTY
BUSINESS (B-2)
. HEARING EXAMIlVER C,O E
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
zCha="
~ . . , -
ATI`EST: ~
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD _
Planrung Director
By OHN W. PED RSON
toor Planner
Y/~a/y3
Date `
Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written
decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commussioners within ten (10) calendar
days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,
W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$200 processing fee payable to the
Spokane County Treasurer.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205.
Pat Harper
County Engineers Office
tio. 93 1100
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WAS H I N GTO N
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSIFICATiON )
ZE-028-93 URBAN RESIDENTIAL (UR-3.5) ZONE TO } NOTICE OF
COMMUNITY BUSINESS (B-2) Z4NE WITHIN THE ASA ) PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT: CHARLES WILLIAMS C/O ROMAX ASSOC. }
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dwight Hume, Agent for the Applicant, has filed Notice
of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of above captioned
application for zone reclassification; and
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the 6oard of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1993, AT 5:30 P.M.
(or as soon as possible thereafter)
COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM
SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLlC WORKS 6UlLQlNG
1026 W BROADWAY AVE
S PD KAN E, WA 99260
to consider this proposal to develop approximate{y 1.1 acres for restaurant, retail sales
and those uses allowed in the Community Business (B-2) zone on property
. Generaily located svuth of and adjacent to Valley Way,
approxlmately 250 feet east of Suliivan Road in the southwest
1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington
NOT(CE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at thls hearing may be any
environmentai documents prepared in conJunction with the proposaf.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and
present testimony verbaily or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application.
The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 7 day of September, 1993.
WILLIAM E. DONAHUE
CLERK OF THE BOARD
R NNE MONT G E, TY
S ~ P 8 ~Rg~
I T IBUTLUN • DATE: / ✓
DEPT. 7 STATE EXAMV PUBLISH 9f 10APPEAL F1LE ~ ZE028N0T.0907
,
F'
t..J ZE,./28-93
~ .
. ~ . ~ , .
,
^ a _ • . ~..~--►--~c ._-1~T ' j''
~ , . ` - - . • ~ i,,, f ~
~
~ n r` • ' ~ _ ~.iw
~ • ~ ~ J ~ . . _ ..~Y ~ _ ~ . 1.
TT~-Y,r 1 ~ ~ .,,s.~..,` / ~ *r~~ ~'~'1'-►~y"~.~ `
NI 4506
~c 1• . .
0 ~ a
~
~ + Q t►.V E. " '
. ; '
~ .
. .Y . S~iatiOn
~ Yt oqr•tS~ ►~,.•c ~ o
U} ~ ~ hoo~~ ~ 14( ,
.
~ 4O .~;~Sy~~ • ~ y
LL E wA
. ,
~
i 3~~ ~ M. i.v.iwr.
~ ~ . . . _ . ' ~ ~~1 ll
0.
~
a ~
R~ ~ S r j._- . ~ J
~ S P R A,GU F- ~ •-~r,-,
` , . ` , ' y jc. t~t._5 ~f
~ ~ `-1/E pA LV
~ • • • I
~ t~ ` . ' • U
± ~ . X r s + ~ V 1
I
r ' 4 LI.Fi
is Az+ f
,-i-~, • . . ~cw /.vE Y. 6~ ~ . ~ ~ '1 j,~4
, L
: ,l . •~~tro'~:o11,e~;:::~:'
T►. C~ . ~ ~ ~P~.1....{.i:e~'~~::':,:':'•:• , .
~ ,
~ '
7T~ tA A,,tYt, a ~ ;;~~1;: • ~ 24 ~ .
r . ; ~.:,.~t• ~ . .
.`'•~GI--~Q, • - , • E . . , : ; . .
~ 1 G 1~~ N . ~ : *~~`~s. . : . _ • . . • • . : •
. ' ' ' ' , { ~ ; ; G=/;~~~::. • , ' ~ - . ; = . ~ •
. , 5 ~y{ ' •~~5~(,~ ~}-1 ' ' ' • . • ` . .
; ' ''l. yr r;~• ~ ::::".p r : ~:l ~.~y. ~ : ,
~ ~N ` 7Cti :='~j;,•: . . .
` ~ •r.~: r~ • . . ~ . . :,rv.Y . , • t~ ~c
• ~ , . . . . . . ^ . • . . ,y
tit Y u ~ . ITEM 10 P
~ . - • ~ ~(O - -
`
P
7. ~
2AC-
E-28-93
- - . ~ ~
~ E~ aff _~e~ort for. . : , .
8/93 S~
• ' , . • . ~ . ~
. . . . . .
, • , .
. . • .
, -j. ' . .
. • ~ . .
• . . , ' , , r' . . . 41
' . i. ~ • ~
, • ' .
. • • • . ~ ~ • . • ' ' 'S•- .
.
• .
' NO 93 15~~4
.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
1N THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) FINDINGS OF
FII.E NO. ZE-28-93; FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 ) FACT,
(UR-3.5) TO COMMUNTTY BUSINESS (B-2) ) DECISION AND
) CONDITIONS
sPoNsoR: RoINIAx AssocIAITs
THIS MATTER, being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board", of an appeal of the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee decision of August 23, 1993 denying Zone
Reclassification File No. ZE-28-93, for the purpose of rezoning approximately 1.1 acres of
land to facilitate development of certain conarnercial uses, including a restaurant and retail
sales, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal"; and the Board of County Commissioners
having held a de novo public hearing on October 26, 1993, and having fully considered all
testimony presented thereat, and the public record files for the proposal; and further havini~
individually visited or being familiar with the site and vicinity in question and having
rendered an oral decision on the 2nd day of November, 1993 approving said proposa] with
modifications, does herebv enter the following:
FINll1NGS UF FACT
1. The proposed rezone is for a parcel of land located on the south side of Valley Way,
approximately 250 feet east of Sullivan Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 13,
Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
2. "Ihe proposal consists of a zone reclassification request for a portion of a proposed
development site from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Community Business
(B-2) to allow develapment of the site for a restaurant and retail sales and those
uses permitted in the Community Business (B-2) zone. •
3. The I-learing Examiner Committee held a public hearing on August 19, 1993
subsequent to which by the Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated
August 23, 1993 the Committee denied the proposal.
4. The applicant appealed the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision in writing to the
Board on August 31, 1993. The appeal contested the findings entered by the
Hearing Examiner Cominittee and contended that the proposal was consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and adjacent land use5.
5. The legal requirements for public notice have bc;c;n fulfilleci.
6. At the public hearing, the applicant testified that the proposal was consistent with
the land uses in the area and with the Comprehensive Plan.
7. At the public hearing an owner of adjacent property expressed opposition to the
proposal, indicati.ng a concern over increased traffic along Valley Way,
inconsistency of the proposal with residential uses in the area, and the destruction
of existing single family dwellings on the subject property and adjacent property
owned by the applicant.
8. The Board adopts the public record files of the Planning Department and the Board
for ZE-28-93 as part of this record.
9. The Board takes notice of provisions of the Spokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan, the Spokane County Zoning Code and the Spokane County
Code.
10. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area encompassed by the proposal as
Urban.
~ l
f
t
BOCC FINDINGS ZE-28-93 Page 2
11. The Hearing Examiner Comzriittee's decision comprises only a recommendarion to
the Board on the rezone proposal. The oral testimony submitted to the Hearing
Examiner Committee was not considered by the Board as part of the record.
12. The original zoning of the property described in the proposal was Agricultural (A)
adopted in 1942 under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The site was
redesignated to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) under the Spokane County Zoning
Code, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code.
13. The County Arterial Road Plan designates Valley Way as a Collector Arterial with a
recommended right of way width of 70 feet. The project has been conditioned to
dedicate right-of-way and set aside adequate right of way for future acquisition.
14. The existing land uses in this area include single family residences and commercial
uses, including a newly developed Fred Meyer store and Smith's Home
Furnishings.
15. The proposal site and adjacent property included in the development project
presendy have three (3) vacant single family dwelling units on-site.
16. Spokane County presently has a lack of affordable housing.
17. To help preserve affordable residential housing in the community, the Board finds it
reasonable to condition the proposal to require the applicant to provide salvage
opportuniaes to the public for the three (3) existing single family dwellings on the
development project site.
18. A Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) is currently being circulated for
installation of public sewer along Sullivan Road, to be installed in 1994 when
Sullivan Road will be widened between Sprague Avenue and Mission Avenue as
part of a County Road Project (CRP).
19. The applicant testified that he is willing to participate in a ULID for public sewer
service to the site. The provision for public sewer is already a recommended
condition of approval by the County Health District and the County Division of
Utilities.
20. The Board finds it reasonable to condition the proposal to require the applicant to
agree to include the subject property in the ULID petition and proposed ULID.
21. The site plan of record submitted by the applicant includes 1.64 acres of property
owned by the applicant within the Community Business (B-2) zone, located west of
and adjacent to the proposal at the southeast corner of Sullivan Road and Valley
Way.
22. A County Road Project (CRP) is underway along Sullivan Road, a major
north/south arterial, which is located approximately 250 feet west of the proposal.
23. The County Road Project (CRP), as proposed, will require the acquisirion of 75
feet from centerline easterly, or approximately 45 feet of the property east of and
adjacent to the existing Sullivan Road right-of-way.
24. The acquisition of right-of-way along Sullivan Road will adversely affect the
development potential of the existing Community Business (B-2) zoned property
west of and adjacent to the subject property.
25. To implement the site plan as proposed, additional Community Business (B-2)
zoning is needed for the proposal.
26. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Detemaination of Nonsignificance was issued. The Board
concurs with the Determination of Nonsignificance.
27. The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substanrially changed in the
area since the original zoning of the site. Specifically, changed condidons include
the designadon of Valley Way as an arterial, the County Road Project (CRP) along
Sullivan Road, the availability of public sewer in the near future, and recent
commercial development in the area.
,
. !
' K
' $O+CC FTNDINGS ZE-28-93 Page 3
28. T'he applicant has dernanstrated that the proposed rezone be.ars a substantial relation
to tlle publ1c he1iLh! safeLy7 ~~ner~ we~fare.
29. The proposat vvill not have a significant adverse imgact upon the public health,
sa.fety, and general welfare especially Yn light of Che conditions adoptei in
conjunction with the apprvval.
DECYSYON
The Board does hereby approve the appeal and thereby appr+oves the zone reclassificatiQn
Tequest from Urban Residential-3.5 ([JR-3.5} ta Corntnunity Business (13-2) subject to the
fvllowing additianal conditians,
I . Tle applicant shall salvage the three existing hauses ta the maximum extent
feasible. 1'he public shall have a period af thirty (30) days to have access to the site
far salvage opportunity.
2. The owner of the propased developtnent site shall agaree to have the 6 garcels (2.74
aczes) involved included within the Utiiity Local Improvement District ([JLID)
currently being circulated for the purNse af the instalTation o#' a public sewer along
Su1livan Road, north of Sprague Avenue.
YN REFEREI`TCE 'I`fJ THE ,A'TTACHED FINDINGS AND ORDER, THE BOAR] 0 F
'COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPT'S 'I'HE F~LLOWING CONDM[]NS (]F
APPROVA-L ATTACHED HER.ETO:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNrNG DEPART1ViEN'C
1. The proposal shall camply with the Cornmuniry Business (B-2) and Aquifer
~Sensftive Area (ASA) Overlay zones as amended,
2. The applicant sha.ll develap suhject praperty ge~~raliy in accordan~e wifin the
concept presented to the Hearing Boci}r. Variations, when approved by the
Plan.rni.ng Directgr/desigrtee, rnay be petmitted, includ'urg, but not limit.ed to building
lacation,landscape plans and general allvwable uses of the permitted zone. AIT
variations must conform to regulaticrns set fvrth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent af the developrnent plans sha11 be maintained.
3. AspecffiC landscape plan, plarrting schedule and provisions for rnaintenance
aceeptable to the PYanning Director/designee shall be subrriitted with a perfonnance
bond for the project gngr to re1ease of building pertnits. Landscaping sha11 ke
installed and maintained so that sight distance at aacess points is not obscured or
impai.red.
4. Approva.l is required by the P1a,nning Di.rector/designee af a specific Eghting and
signirrg plan for the described property prior to the release vf any building perrnits.
5. The Spokane Caunty Flanning Department shatl pregare and record with the
Cvunty Auditor aTitle IVotice specifying a future land acyuisition area for road
right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisiaon area Title Notiee s1ha11
only be releaseci, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The norice should
be rmorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the
fvllvwing:
a. At least 5 feet of reserved future acquisip,an area for raa.d right-of-way and
utilities, in additian to the existing anci/or newly dedicared right-of-way along
Valle}r Way NU'X'E: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of new
dedication.
b . Future bm'lding and other setbacks required by the Spnkane Caunty Zonu~g
Code shall be- measured from the reserve.d future acquisition area.
C. No reqrairei Iandscaping, parking, "208" areas, dxainfield ar allawed signs
shou1d be locate,d uriChin the future acquisition area for mad right-of-way and
utilities. If any of the above improvements are rriade within this area, they
shall be relocatead at the applicant`s expense when roadvvay improvements are
made.
\
• ! • •
I
- BOCC FTNDINGS ZE-28-93 Page 4
d. The future acquisidon area, until acquired, shall be private property and may
- be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered interim uses.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of
special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title
Norice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the
property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the
subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on August 19, 1993, imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. ZE-28•93 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Spokane County Planning Department that the existing structures
have been removed from the site.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in
conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever action
comes first:
2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Valley Way for right-of-way purposes beginning
at the east property line and continuing to Sullivan Road.
Prior To Issuance Of A BuildinE Pemut Or Use Of The Pronertv As Provosed:
3. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans.
5. A parking plan and traffic circularion plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Collector Arterial standard for the improvement of Valley Way, which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the add.ition of approximately 10-12
feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending to Sullivan
Road. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to
be completed prior to the release of a building pernut, or a bond in an amount
' ~ .
- ~ .
' BQCC FINDINGS ZE-28-93 Page 5
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
11. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
12. The County Arterial Road Plan identif'ies Valley Way as a Collector Arterial. The
existing right-of-way width of 40 feet is not consistent with that specified in the
Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addirion to the required
right-of-way dedicadon, a strip of property 5 feet in width along the Valley Way
frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane
County at the time when arterial unprovements are made to Valley Way.
13. There may exist udlities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocadon
regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocadon costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
Svecial Condition:
14. A County Road Project is currently underway for Sullivan Road. Spokane County will
be acquiring 75 feet from centerline of Sullivan Road to construct the proposed project.
The right of way plan was formally adopted by the County Engineer as per the Spokane
County Road Standards. This will effect the site plan as submitted for this rezone,
alterations will need to be done to the site plan at the time of building permit to reflect
this acquisition by Spokane County on that portion of the site plan that is outside this
rezone request.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petirion method pursuant to
RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the formadon of a ULID by
resolution methai pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petirion or resolution methai under RCW Chapter 36.94.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connecrion permit
is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the
Utilities Department.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method sha11 be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. ,
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project. Use of individual on-
site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized."
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
• 1 .
. , ,
• BOCC FINDINGS ZE-28-93 Page 6
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of cale requirements administered/enforced as authorized by
the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Fire apparatus
access roads; fire hydrantJflow; approved water systems; building accessibility;
construction type; occupancy classificarion; exiting; exterior wall protection; and
energy code regulations.
BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS DAY OF DECEMBER, 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
. .
Patricia A. M , Chair .
ASte n sson Chilberg
Vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissioners as follows:
Commissioner Patricia A. Mummey - Aye to approve the rezone
Commissioner Steven Hasson - Aye to approve the rezone
Commissioner D.E. Chilberg - Aye to approve the rezone
ATl'EST;
WII.LIAM E DONAHUE
Clerk of th oard ,
,
,
By:
Ros e on ague, De uty Cler
OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR DATE AND PLACE FOR COMMENCING AN APPEAL
NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680(5), notice is hereby given by the Board of
County Corrunissioners in conjunction with the approval of the above-
referenced matter that:
(1) Pursuant to Section 14.402.180 of the Spokane County Code, the time
limit for commencing an appeal of the approval of the above-referenced
matter is thirty (30) calendar days from the Board of County
Commissioner's execurion of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and
Condirions.
(2) The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the
approval of the above-referenced matter is thirty (30) days after the
r y y
.
P BOCC FINL7IN~S ZE-2$-93 Page 7
exeeution of the above Findings af Fact, L7ecision and Canditians. A
notice of intent to raise SEPA issues by judicial appeal is reqvired and
. must ~e filed with Wallis D. Hubbard, Dir+ectar of Planning West 1026
Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, within thirty (30) calendar days after
exeeUtion of the abave Findangs of Fact, Y]ecision a,rid Conditions.
(3) The appeal vf exther the apprcaval af the abvve-referenced matter or any
SEFA issues must ~e filed in the Spokane County Superiar Court vr a
court of cornpetent jurisdiction as provided by law.
9 '
ZE1~l28ww93
JOIi
- - ~ ' ~ -
~ _ -
U ~ \ • . ~ "PO
<
~
IL rd~;L
sr, o A-``~.J 9O
"
~ ~J a' 7 h ! R I(?G E
` Q' I- J r Nt 45 l.' 6
0
I E ROA D W~Y ,~V Ili
`13
n - Y Fir-c . ,
~ 15 p S ta fi! OT►
n oqres~
+ W ~ I
~S
o
4-f
0 S:D I >
~ r D ~
a
N
~ Au._~, w A - • a ~ L-
. . . . ~ •
Ln i-'A,~`~ ~ k
Z
~ „ 7 M, nV.S_
~ f~ I N - - - - - • - - - - - "r,c, ,n~ n,
- n~
Ri
• ~ _ o
Y C LL
iy • SPRaGUE XV, rv`
~ Ik
" ` VE "C A L E
~ _ ~ - - - - - - (C M. ST f
~
z N
F M r~ N ~ ~
hi ` f '
c
_.D
. .
s rr+ ,
T M
2 L E Y~
~TM ~ . ~i. W 6 •,1 • .
cr
~~A DA t~l =e~nt iro I•~ 1~ o I I'e X; ~4 ,4 KE ,
.
' T u
;~GHO o ~ '.f i'eI'~3 ,
, a ~ , .
• 0. IGWi H AvE =~.'.,'V'~~ . '
3
97H 'C'v.
' .T,. . ~ ~ • .•f~:I~G H"
~,071-,
~ITW
~ o,,.,,,~+ ~~_~Q_a~ Paoe 62
J
~
~ -
ZE,,28.93
,r . , r • ' ~ ~r
`r
N ~ 7010
`lfh~ Well
'
, _2"0 ' yyvy` " l~ ~ITNl O ?004 ' - f~ I~•1i~
NS(1,`1~ ~ ; ~ ~ . \l i t!/~C~[~ ( ~ ~ • • • •p ~ V ~
4 , ~cN,,~, / ~ ~ ~ ~ 60 rr0 w
P
~ ~ ~ l.~v\'~•`,~r~'' ~ t/
~ ~ .
' 6orro
C J ~ v Y
I
,R
12 • ' „
1
~ _ } ~ 1 ~ • ~ '
00 - . - - ' •
60tro ► ~ ti
A
, 10 14
~ . .
~ 'Nr RN ~ p IL '
~ . 5ullivan
- - ~ , • ~r ; Park ~ ~ r
` ~ . . _ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ •
t ~
, • ~
~ • , . rN~'Rni ~ _ ` - • •
. ~ A.,~er~u _ _ _ - - ~ - • - - _ _ _ r. - . ~?ooo Gr
' .1000 T.
I%o . 1~ •iMy ~ ~ • • , ' • r
. ~ + o
?05 ~
9Q
~ ~ ~
~
~wwj r~ 8R Q 3 i 1
F~ i 1 _ - ~ • .
~ a.
~t
~r i a ~u- ~ ~ `5ch re
'
h1~
EI T031 " i ' ~ _ K• 1~!R":'.~~• „wA r Jrlli~,
~ ~ . ~ .`j • " ° ;~ch'
00 VALLEY ~o~ ° 1• • ,
~s j 'i ~ Z ♦ r, ~ ~ 3 ~ • ~~i • ~
~•....•t . , . ~ . ,
s a ~ ~ _ ~I; ~ • " , _
dale :
:~tr ' Vera
~ ~ r~ i ~ ~ • • ~ w . ~ ~1. ~
i ~ - ~ ' Q ~ ,~~~T ~ • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
~ ~OZn ~ fa• • • ♦ . . o . „ ~ , •1 ~ •
* '~1 d
• s~
~
' Gtarel Pltf• . . ~ ~ter,,
~p t+ • P-" ' i ,/i ep • Park , -
~ ~ s li•,1~~' . ~ ' • ' ' r.- •
i ~3l hl~ry~ a • t;~.~~ ~ ~ ~,o ~
w~ n• ~ ~ SCIt ~ ~ • . • • ~ i . ~s ~ • r v ,U ~y ! ^'y~" ~
201
o ° I : a ~ ~ o \ ✓ ~ • ) ~~~~Y`L]~`V~ ~ /t
• " 1 Y1 ~ 41 ~ x3'~t~ fl 1V' a N 1 ~
r
~•~r 'b3 . ' , at ' • ; , •i! ~ ~ t~~ 1 s
weli Pln'~SAOi~ zo
~ /►d*m~ •i ~ Z~ 1^Jc
~ tt 10~r3
~ ~ . • . ~ ~ tilltch Scfi
• S•• • tS~~
OR47_. a n w • a 1' ~ . N 1
;4ii ' ~ • ~
23 . • , t ; ~
•O •~1• ~~w • ~ • " 1} ~
• ~ ws.,., . , ~ y~ i E ?de6 n
II' ~ ~ ~ u~. . ` t I „ ! ' t .
1 ll o~ ~fJtiA_-`~rz~++c t ti5 i ~ a P'ti.y
• • • I •!-Ii s' ~i i ~ ~ ~
~ • 9 '
!_~itt~ • ~~s~• t ~ ' e .
~ AVENUE _ -j( ~ ~ • • ~ i ' o u o i t I~ ~ ~ 3 li.
~ M u f1u. O O t • ' 1 7.
iW f
r ° ~~~~i ■ . . di • ~
i R k
r r • • ~ p, iii i~ii~` • i ~ ~ ' y
};rergrten • . s , =~+1' ' `
n . ~ •1~• ~ ' ~ 1 ~ " p • i ~ ~ ~ i i , a ~
rb ~ ~ ~ 't~' i
~ • , J,!♦ ¢
2082 - N • • ~ ' + b (t
~ .r ~ u . , ~ ' •1r , .
Q i ~4 1 ~ ~t • ! , j`', ~ 'ti 11~ + ,
Q 1 -ar-.. ~ •tn • 4 l ' • t
{ ~ ,s" ..~~~:h~----~ • ~ ,1 ~ nRa#a-~=~.o~aao j~~~ 4 ` i ~ tl~~
_ • ~ _ _ . - a t I ~ 1 . . ~~i'~ ~A 1, , f
~ ~ • ~ 0 i ,
a
f ~ !
,...m page 63
\
QPoort for ZE-28-93
f
. ZEmw28.93 ~
t
r
, •s' ~ .
tz, _ jolo
Well
c ~pp~.
,t f . ~~~%l~`~~r•~•f~~ . ~ ' ' ""Q <
~ ..7' k)r l ; V
Borrow
z ~ P r t 0
11ti 1 . ~ i4~'j~ \ • ~ fL ` ~ ` j~. I
Borro
< <y,o„ ~ ! ~ ,1 , • , ~ ` 1
R
1900We - ~b 12
~ ~ .
~ ~ ' 11 r • 4
oo ' . ~ • i.r p~ ~ ' . u
~ ~
Eiarrow
~ A ' •
INT RN ~ • OL. SuNlven
P e t k
~ - . • ~ °
~ . „ . " i ` ~ ~ . • ~ •
- r• _ • !
~Ao- ~ - - ~ ~
• - .
. r~„~EIPle1
/;,000
\`J 1
. • - - ~ ` ~ ~ ,1
?000
• 3~` ~ • ~ • ~ • u 1
, I 1 ~ • U ~
~ ~
705 ~ - ' tti
'Ny''''*~ • . . ~E 90
w~13 j ,+r+,,+!*'-~
QRp
g . .
• o .~ti ~ ' , ~
~ ~ ~ ' o S ~ r' • J1 . s.
~~...w~ NU~ ` • x~reia
tel" ~h i j l~
05- ~ ~ ~ Y , L 1~~•w'~' i~ µ•il 1' ' . • ° J r 111SCF1
~ ~ VALL£Y • ~ ° K~h
~ ~ .
. ~
~ i
U N. 10 . . Pa0 + .
s e _ ~ - ~ • Veradale :~;•-~-•l1 s: • ~ • ~
. .
1 '(t' t _ .'-s a ~ ~M • ~ '~U•~ ~ " `
~ --AWE v jn ~ _ ~~l►- . . .t . q ~ , I. _ ~
Sr •
r
G(eYel Qit-" d s~►~
. •
r.• ' 1 • ob • - Park
li j • ~J~~~ . ~ ~ i , ~ ~ n . ' ' ~ l s~r-~.~ ^ i
♦1 ~ l p (y
R~{ch _ o t• ' i ~ 0 ~ ~l F~ t~~(
l . ~
?0 • ~ ~ ~1~1+~ O _t1
• ~ ~ • :
' N u i , ' I.c,~`T. , "r • ,
.~y,1 ` O + • • ~ lJ ry ~
~ • I ~ ~ r N I,~ (t
ol
` 171Lr ~Y,) a
. . a, : o 2 Q
weu 20, i ~
a~,atn c~aiti~ Adamo ~ j;
Ii 10 / ~ •~T1~! _ .
Central V►Uft y _
;{Zf S~ • ' • 8efi
p , . iffRh 13th
~ ~ q r ~ ,`l • ~ ,
~1~~~ •
~ ►1 : . . . , _ ; • , ~':,f r,
23
~ ~ . ~ : ~ ; , •
„
~ • • • M • ~ ' , • ~ d~6 , ' , a t ~ ~
. ` l,.
1. ~ ~ • ~ ° - ~ ~~.7 ~l,/~ JI : ~r U ~ r1 a prt ~
,I • , t ' ,
• -.~.t~~
AYCNUf=,_ t...- .:r_•-~r . • ~ o ~ f t
. • ~ ~ea b ~ ° u I , ~t
. ~ . _ • ~ nk
~ • 1 - ~ • jj
. ~ p. . ~
• ' , t:re*Rree° ' + ~
f ~ ~ ' i ` . ' ° ~ ~ / - 1 - i•t ,
.1 ~r~~~• ~ j 1~ ~ ~ ,
• e ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q
• ~ ~ o ~ a
16
' ' ~
. y ~,ly (
,Val
Q'
~:~q ` , s-,,.~. 1 y ~ ry ~ ~ • ~ tr ~
. - d r1:._ r-^:~~✓I a~ aan~6'~ia«a~,a0 r~~~ 46 1 ~ ~
. ~ ~ , ' _ r f . r •1'I ~a S, !
O
a . / t
page 63
~
ZE
~onnrt fot" -28-93
- • ' ~
~
ZE=28m93
~ - - - ~ - .
►
UR4*5 - ~~-~--1.-
B_2
F
`
~ cr4
~
D ° 8-2 Q
sr~^' d1
e - I
~ o •R,ocE
Nt45C6
~ lait: ~ .
1►bu. ~ Q Bm3
♦ ~ ~
E ROA O Ati' Av E.
14 ~ ~rc
~ o9rr•,yi (S°a,,..~r ta t I Orl
W
d sc n c~o I~ I
~ 40 Scc.t ~
~ , 0 s c URm3*5 o
~
. e- ~
~
~ ~ ' r • AL L C '
- - ~ " 1~ -
:z URm3e5
tN D 8 ' . ,j j , tit A.v,E
m
2
`UR T R~ r~ UR-22 0-
3 M B -2 c~ ' 2
t- B _ e-3
8~2 PRAGAUE B- UR- U N
, ~ • ~~~c_,,,►.,~ ~ _
J~
J '
3 e
vE~ y N N g_3
~ S B- B1~
m = c~,
3 (
~y--
- ~ _ - -
R•22 U_ ~
M r ~ ~ ~ ■ .
' N'" ' jN • ~ 82
~y
t .D c UR-7'
r ~ - .
URm3
• t '
~TM I. y • .I rN . I ~
_ R- '2 ~ k
~
2 6 "22 ^L'LLEY
w ' r
. T~ cA~~AM.. ~ ~M S•Qntro 1, ~ AK~ ~
7' ~ • , i • ~ r ! \
`PJ, .f i e • ~ ~
Z.QHO . ~ ' . UR 3.5
Q
IGN~ N I►vE ~ .
3 ~ ' 24 -
. ;j ~ . = 9TN
. y~ - , ~ :H: i:~'N • -
' up
. , ' ' ' : ` . ~N~~
~ • i
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE_28-93 Page 64
00
~
~
W
J ~
m . ~
cn 4 -
C.+ ~
.cu w.r
I
~ + ~ n L L e v w n y (c,itr~v~ ~w ..lW) f~_~+O'•~:::n -
~ ! • I
~ nn f ~ H rYw y ~ M~ r~
(D ~ • . ~ t ` _ ' M .>1t°~, ~ v . . • ^
O . / ~ 4 • . ~ ~ `A N `1 ~I I~ ' ~ l.~~i...Y~.y
V
(
1
VIGI017)l MAP
~ c
I , . y~ - -.R. ~•.n. ~ ~ ~
0
Th 4 v.
I ~ I n n,~ ~ d„ n - ■
0
~ ~ i e~•~ , t i~e coatr w.~.....r,.~..) e
N
RE7A iL_ aviLoING
1T • 1
N V I w I ~ `.A/ 1 % 01W `rw . ~p~ ~IM~ w 4a • L
q ~ ;
i ; ;
~ ~ ~ 1 i C~ / fAUirw ~fwr.r..[..1'~ 4 n
e I ~ , C.er..+.w,enwue:!•.a. . 5~
~ , + I ~~(n~ 'itl~et~u Sti.•. loo
\ 1 I fot+~ w.r~.r i .~tv
war+wwc~~` ~ ~ ~ I P.µ.W r1o~~ao • ~fl
u.w . n. il ~ti ri
i _
r d ~ ,
I ,,...r- w. .
Z ~ ' a .,I . . n . , , ~ N • ' ._~-n~.. . ,
~ I+ ^ M'!f I - _ ~ _ _ ~ ^ t n ~ Ih~r
\ o I^ ~ . l ~ ~ a
J pI ~ r
( ~ r » u ~ ° _ •
~ u ~1 M 11 M If 11 I~ P
J~a (~I' ~ 1 \
J `n"'s,~ ` .
^ Al~/ ,o
R641,,VRA4T
~ •;a ` ~ ~ I - „ ~ v~t
` 5 000 Sf
.)~.MJ` 1 M ~ i Cutllf~a~Y RO,.nnr /~CfOGi~1e•
~ A~ •n.+~ `
r.~ a J..~. ~g~, W~cn~ ntir, r U ~
I ,P:~~~a ^ ~ ~
U_ s-Y NU4i
n~.ro ~ ~ ,a~ •
(V fJt~hl W"°a
~ /AAhIwM
~ R~MW ~ '
SITE PLAN
; Y. 14 t `/Inv N) sOMt ~..L
{ U I'.
i F F uonrN
T T A•1
~ 7 r_- 9 Q-Qx
~
t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1993
SUBJECT: ZE-28-93; ZONE RECLASSIFICATZON I'IZOM URBAN
RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO COMMUNITY
BUSINESS (B-2) WITHIN THE AQUIFER SENSITIVE
AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZQNE.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Romax Associates
c% Charles M. Williams
South 613 Washington Suite 102
Spokane, WA 99204
(509) 624-3777
Agent: Dwight Hume
N. 9101 Mt. View Lane
Spokane, WA 99218
(509) 467-7822
Contact Planner: Sta.cy Bjordahl
Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Valley Way, approximately
250 feet east of Sullivan Road in the SW 1/4 0f Section 13, Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: Zone reclassif'ication from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Community Business (B-2) for a restaurant, retail sales and those uses permitted in
the Community Business (B-2) zone.
IY. SITE INFORMATION
A. Site Size: Rezone site = 1.1 acres
Exisring Community Business (B-2) Zone = 1.64 acres
Total Site Area. = 2.74 acres
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 66
. • '
B . Comprehensive Plan
,
1. Land Use Plan: The proposal is located within the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and within the Priox'ity Sewer Service Area (PSSA).
The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development
of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses with the more
intensive land uses located near the heavily travelled streets. Commercial
development within the Urban category is intended to be less intensive and
limited to those uses permitted in the Neighborhood Business (B-1) zone.
The more intensive commercial zones are intended to implement the Major
Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plarl which abuts the rezone
portion to the west. Commercial zones such as the proposed Community
Business (B-2) zone should be located in the Major Commercial category
and should not extend into areas designated for less intensive Urban uses.
The proposed Community Business (B-2) zone and those uses allowed are
not comparible with the Goals, Objectives and Declsion Guidelines of the
Urban category of the Comprehens1ve Plan. This proposal, if approved,
would extend commercial uses into a residential arel and may establish a
precedent for future requests.
2. Arterial Road Plan: The proposal fronts on Valley Way which is
designated on the Spokane County Ai-terlal Road Plan as a Collector Arterial
with a recommended right-of-way wicitll of 70 feet. The exisring right-of-
way width of 40 feet is not consistent wlth that specified in the A.rterial
Road Plan. In ord-,r to implement the Plan, the County Engineer is
requesting 10 feet of dedication along the Valley Way frontage extended to
Sullivan Road. In addition to the reqtlired dedication, a strip of property
five (S) feet in width shall also be set aside as Futtire Acquisition Area
(FAA) along the rezone portion that fzonts Valley Way, or approximately
the easterly 155 feet of the proposal. Sullivan Road, which is adjacent to
the existing Community Business (B-2) portion of the proposal, is
designated on the Arterial Road Plan as a Principal Arterial with a
recommended right-of-way width of 100 feet. A County Road Project
(CRP) is currently underway for Sullivan Road which includes
improvements along the roadway section adjacent to this proposal. The site
plan submitted illustrates property widths ranging between twelve (12) and
twenty two (22) feet along Sullivan Road which will be set aside as Future
Acquisition Area (FAA). This property will be acquired by Spokane
County as needed for the road improvements to Sullivan Road. Note: The
Future Acquisition Area (FAA) for Su111van Road as described above is not
required as a result of this zone change.
3. County Parks Plan: Sullivan Park is identified as the nearest park
facility on the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan. Sullivan Park is
located northwest of the proposal on the north bank of the Spokane River,
west of Sullivan Road. Sullivan Park is a 10 acre community park with
various picnic and play equipment on site.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 67
-
C. Site Characteristics: One existing single family residence is located on the
rezone portion of the proposal. The remainder of the site is covered with native
grasses, shrubs and deciduous trees. D. Neighborhood Characteristics: 'I'he surrounding area consists of
commercial, residential and nonresidential uses. Single family dwellings are
located to the west, north, and east of the site. Larbe anlmal keeping is also
present in the area. Commercial uses are located along Sprague Avenue and
Sullivan Road. A Vera Water and Power Substatian is located directly north of
the site on the northeast corner of Sullivan Road and Valley Way. Fred Meyer
and Smith's Home Furnishings are constructing stores on parcels south of the
proposal along Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue.
E. Zoning Analysis: The existing zone classifications 1n the area allow both
residential and commercial uses. Parcels along Sulllvan Road are zoned primarily
for commercial use, and those areas east and west of Sullivan Road within the
Urban category boundary are zoned for residenrial use. The most recent zone
reclassification request in the area is a proposal to convei-t approximately 2 acres
from Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) (ZE-27-93)
which will be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee also this month. That
proposal is located north of Valley Way, just west of Sullivan Road. The most
recent commercial zone reclassification to occur in the ai-ea was south of the site
for the Fred Meyer retai,l center which is located on 25 acres and has the potential
to adequately serve the shopping needs in the area. The existing commercial
establishments and those under development may suf~'iciently serve the area
without necessitating the need for ldditional commercial property through the
rezone process.
Proposal: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) cstablished in 1991
North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
classified as Agricultural (ZE-60-42).
South: Community Business (B-2) establ.ished in 1989, previously
classified as Agricultural, Commercial and Residential Office (ZE-
27-89).
East: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
classified as Agricultural (ZE-60-42).
West: Community Business (B-2) established in 1991, previously
classified as Agricultural (ZE-60-42).
F. Land Use Analysis: Commercial, residential and non-residenrial uses exist in
the area which include a power substation to the north, and Fred Meyer and
Smith's Home Furnishings which are currently under construction south of the
proposal. The most recent development in the area has occurred on parcels
fronting Sullivan Road and include Pizza Hut and Subway restaurants which are
located on the west side of Sullivan Road. The area has not been subject to recent
residential development as most of the area is developed with single farYVly
dwellings and duplexes on both platted and unplatted lots.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 68
,
Site: Single family residence and vacant land.
,
North: Vera Water and Power Substation, single family residences.
South: Future Fred Meyer store, Future Snuth's Home Furnishings.
East: Single family resldences.
West: Single family residences, Pizza Hut, Subway.
G. Circulation: Valley Way will provide direct access to the rezone portion. If the
zone reclassification is approved, the applicallt is proposing to develop the subject
property and existing Community Business (B-2) parcels as shown on the site
plan of record. The proposed site plan illustrates one access approach from
Sullivan Road and two (2) access approaches from Valley Way. Based on the
adjacent land use to the east and north, the Plannzng Department does not support
two access approaches to Valley Way. Access from Valley Way should be
located as far west as possible to nutigate potential traffic impacts to the existing
single family residences north of and east of the proposal. All internal travel lanes,
and parking spaces will be paved. flloading space is proposed along the eastern
portion of the site, east of the retail building. The Planning Department
recommends relocating this loading area so 1s to elinunate potential adverse
impacts to the existing residential use to the east.
The applicant will be required to make improvenzents to Valley Way along the
frontage of the development and extended to Sullivan Road which include the
construction of curb and sidewalk. The consrruction of curbing and sidewalk
along Sullivan Road is also required as per the County Road Project (CRP) which
is currently underway.
H. Design: The site plan of record proposes development of approximately 2.74
acres. The rezone portion includes the east 1.1 acre. The proposed restaurant
and the majority of required parkinc, will be located on the western portion of the
site and the retail structure will be located on the eastern portion of the property.
The site plan illustrates 153 parking spaces which exceeds the 150 required for
the proposed uses. Although most of the parking is located west of the proposed
retail structure, some parking is proposed east of the structure. The Planning
Department recommends the required parking be relocated so that traffic
circulation is contained on the westerly portion as opposed to that area adjacent
single family residences. The proposed location of the restaurant meets the
required Community Business (B-2) setback from Sullivan Road and also
provides a 20 foot setback from the south property line although no setback is
required. The proposed location of the retail stclicture is 35 feet from the north
property line and approximately 63 feet from the east proPerty line. As
submitted, the proposal conforms to the development standards of the
Community Business (B-2) zone but may unpact the existing residential uses
along Valley Way as discussed above.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 69
1. - Site Plan Data '
Proposed Site Plan:
Use: restaurant and retail sales and t}lose tises allowed in the Community
Business (B-2) zone.
Proposed Buildings: Two (2) stnictures.
Building(s) Footprint Area: restaurant = 5,0()0 square feet.
Retail building = 19,900 square feet.
Site Coverage: Approxirnately 21%.
Maximum Structure Height: None proposed. Structures shall not exceed
35 feet in height as per the Community Business (13-2) standards.
Building Setbacks: Pxoposed Required
Front yard (Sullivan Road) 35 feet 351/65'
Flanking yard (Valiey Way) 35 feet 35765'
Side yard (South) 20 feet None requixed
Rear yard (East) 63 feet 15 feet
Parking 150 spaces 153 spaces
Note: Front and Fla.nking yard setbacks measured fronl Future Acquisition
(FAA).
Proposed Buffering/Landscaping Techniques: A twenty (20) foot
wide strip of Type I landscaping is required along the east property line
which abuts residential zoning. Five (5) feet of Type III landscaping is
required along the Valiey Way and Sullivan Road frontage. Three (3) foot
wide landscape plantings are also proposed within the parking lot. All
required landscaping and improvements will be implemented through the
building pernut process. The submitted site plan demonstrates compliance
with the development standards of the Community Business (B-2) zone.
Other Site Plan Considerations: The site plan submitted for revzew by
the Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to
determine compliance with all Spokane County Zoning Code regulations
and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to
occur at the Building Permit stage.
J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and
approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development.
K. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: None proposed.
Any required easements will be disclosed during the build.ing pezmit process.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 70
' -
, L. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Vera Water District. A water plan
and-provisions for water service wfll be required prior to the issuance of building
pernuts.
M. Sewage Disposal: Connection to a public sewer system is required by the
County Utilities Department.
N. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. No
comments were received by the school district.
0. Fire Protection: The proposal is withiil Fire District No. 1. The Fire District
and the Division of Buildings Departnient (Fire Marshall) are required to approve
fire protection provisions prior to the issuance of building permits.
P. Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Znventory Maps do not indicate the
presence of wetlands on the site.
Q. Cultural Resources: None have been identified.
R. Transit: The proposal is within the Publie Transit Benefit Area (PTBA)
boundary. Three (3) service routes, No. 18Broadway Feeder; No. 9/East
Sprague; and No. 24/24th Avenue, are within Z blocks of the site.
111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by
the County Planning Department. The review coclsidered the specifics of the
proposal, other available information, County ordi nances, other regulations and
laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive
Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Depaxtment has
determined that "No probable signi.f'icant aciverse impacts" would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a DetenYiinarlal of NonsiLynificance
("DNS The 'DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment.
The "DNS" comment period ends August 17, 1993 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the
public hearing.
IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Community Business (B-2) zone is not consistent with the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan.
Uses permitted in the Community Business (B-2) zone may be incompatible with
established residential zoning and uses along Valley Way. Further, the site pian
proposed does not mitigate potential adverse impacts to the established residential uses
located north and east of the site. The Planninb Department recommends denial of the
zone reclassificarion. •
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 71
°
9
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. A1l conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall
be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the
owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
ii. The zone reclassification applies to the foltawing real property:
The North half of Tract 28 of VERA, as per plat thereof recorded
in Volume "O" of Plats, page 30; EXCEPT the East 222 feet AND
EXCEP'1' the West 267.5 feet t11et•cuf; Situate in the County of
Spokane, State of Washington.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR7'MENT
1. The proposal shall comply with the Community Business (B-2) and Aquifer
Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when lpproved by the
Planning Director/designee, may be permitted, lncluding, but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All
variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. A specific landscape plan, plwlting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planning Director/designee sha.ll be submltted with a performance
bond for the project prior to release of Uuildijlg permits. Landscaping shall be
installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points Is not obscured or
imp aired.
4. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific Iighting and
signing plan for the described property pnor to the release of any building pernuts.
5. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the
County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road
right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisinon area Title Notice shall
only be released, in full or in part, by the Pianning Department. The notice should
be recorded within the same rime frame as acl appeal and shall provide the
following:
a. At least 5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way a.nd
utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along
Valley VVay NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of new
dedication.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning
, Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisinon area.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 72
' -
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs
should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. If any of the above improvements 1re made within this area, they
shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are
made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, elcept that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered interim uses.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Tide Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of
special conditions imposed as a result of zipproval of a 11nci use action. This Title
Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the
property in question. The Title Norice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planning Department. The Title Noace sha11 generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ )
is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing _
Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a
variety of special development conditions. File No. [
] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County
Planning Department.
7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Spokane County Plannunb Dep~i-ttnent that tlte existing structures
have been removed from the site.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGIN~ERING AND ROADS
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in
conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever action
comes first:
2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Valley Way for right-of-way purposes beginning
at the east property line and continuing to Sullivan Road.
Prioz To Issuance Of A Building Permit 4r Use Of The Prouertv As Proposed:
3. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans.
5. A parldng plan and tra.ffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The'design, locarion and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Eng-ineex, will be required for any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. •
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 73
6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Collector Arterial standard for the improvement of Valley Way, which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the addltion of approximately 10-12
feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development and extending to Sullivan
Road. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, uilless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to
be completed prior to the release of a buildlri(Tpermit, or a Uond in an amount ,
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of constz uction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road Plan identi~'ies Valley W1y as a Collector Arterial. The
existing right-of-way width of 40 feet is ilot conslstent with that specified in the
Plan. In order to implement the Artei-ial Road Plan, in addition to the required
right-of-way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet ln widtll along the Valley Way
frontage shall be set aside in reserve. Tllis property may be acquired by Spokane
County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Valley Way.
12. There may exist utilities, either underbround or overhead, affecrinb the subject
property, includ.ing property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
Special Condition:
13. A County Road Project is currently underway for Sullivan Road. Spokane County will
be acquiring 75 feet from centerline of Sullivan Road to construct the proposed project
The right of way plan was formally adopted by the County Engineer as per the Spokane
County Road Standards. This will effect the site plan as submitted for this rezone,
alterations will need to be done to the site plan 7t the time of building pernut to reflect
this acquisition by Spokane County on that portlon of the slte plan that is outside this
rezone request.
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 74
~
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OI' UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Conlmissloners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This audlorization is
conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulanons of the Spokane Counry
Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the He.-cflth District.
2. [The dedication shall state: ]
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the forniation of ULID by petition method pursuant
to RCW 36.94, which perition includes the owller(s)' propei-ty; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the forniation of a tTLID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 3694 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohxbit the awner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessinent(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the foniiation of a ULID by either
petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94."
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokatle County, as amended.
4. [The dedication shali state: ]"Each ilew dwellin~ uclit sh111 be double-plumbed for
connection to future areawide collection systems."
5. Applicant shall make connection to public; sewer system. Sewer corinection pernut
is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the
Utilities Department.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRXCT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Dizector of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water
systems is prohibited."
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDxNGS
NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF PRINTING
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 75
Y^.
• ,
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# ZF=028=93-9--4
Related File # ( )
nate to Revicw 8-19-93 'T'ime # 7
Uate to AA & DR 6-9-93 Time 2:15
Date Received 5-27_93
Project Name UR 3.5 TO B-2 RCSTAURANT & RL?'I'111L No. Lots 6 No.Acres 2.7
-Section - Township - Range
S1TE ADDRESS SEC SULLNAN/VALLEYWAY PARCEL # 13543-1219+
Applicant's Name C=HARI_FS WII.LIAMS C'/O itOMA.K ASSOGIA'I'hS Phone # 624-3777
Address 613 S WASI-IING"TON-SPOKANL WA 99204 Work #
Date Conditions mailed -y-fL'
/j --C7, ~
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD "LONE d NO W S SCEIOOL 356
Engineer ! Surveyor's ! Architect's Name DWIGHT HUME
9101 N MT VIFW LN
SPOKANE WA 99218
467-7$22
Planning Contact Per,san STACY I3JORllAHL Phone # 456-2205
Datc Suhmitted Description Initials ,
~
~
ACiREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY "I'O ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEFS COMPLFTCD & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NUTIC,1: TO PU[3LIC # ! 3 4 6 COMYLL:IEll - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVI.ATTON SUBMITTED
AL"TEItATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
I/7 ICl ~ HEARING EXAM APPROVED t,--_DENIED- `~APPEALED BBC t-AYPROVED DENIED
I
I ~
~I
.
k1p%rcview.for '
0 - 11 - 4
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET I
BLDG. PERM IT # -or -FI LE#
Related File # ( ) I
Date to Review T'ine #
Date to AA & DR 6-9-93 Time 2:15
Date Received 5-27-93
Project Name UR 3.5 TO B-2 RESTAURANT & RE'CAIL No. Lots 6 No.Acres 2.7
'Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS SEC SULLIVAN/VALLEYWAY PARCEL # 13543-1219+
Applicant's Name CHARLES WILLIAMS GIO ROMAX ASSOCIA'I7ES Phone # 624-3777
Address 613 S WASIIINGTON-SPOkANE Wn 99204 Work #
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE d NO W S SCHOOL 356
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name DWIGHT HiJNT:
9101 N MT VIEW LN
SPOKANE WA 99218
467-7822
Planning Contact Person STACY BJORDAHL Phoae # 456-2205
Uate Submitted Description Initials
_ n
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLL"TED & COPY 'PO AGCOUNTING
FINAI, PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY 'PO ACCOUNTING
NOTTGE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NFEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
AL'IERATION TO PLAT - BLOGKS & LOTS
! HEt1RING EXAM APYROVED DENIED--APPCALED BBC -APYROVED llENIED I
~
I I
I
~
.
K1p1t1review.1or
.
~
f
C?FF I GE OF THE COUNTY EhIG Ih.lEEi3
c 3F'Dk`ANE C"[]LJNTY, WASI-IThIGTDhI
A i-tc1 i_t st 'r' I 993-1
To: Spo[•an~ Cclunty f'l.ariniriq Depart(npi-it (Current Pl anninq
Administr~tor)
From: Spl-it-ane Gounty Enqineer' s bepar trnent &3--tk•
Subjec t: Cc-in c} itionaof Approv al "L on E C han qe
App1i. r_arits nl~..~mP Romt..~x_A~soc .
Sectiori 13, Towns17ipN, ~6'Xanqe 44 FWM
re:~Zoning
The foL 1oW1ng "Cotidl tlons ~~-f ptppY'oVal~~ fc-Y the aE]oVE' YefeY'E.'3 iced ;.'.-.;ir1E-'
change are submx.tted tc- the S;aoN.ane County H~~rinca E•:aminer Committee
foi'' it"1 CluS 1on l f1 th~.' "P1 ai"1 i 11 i"t QRf? pcii' t" afl C~ "T-1 Pl Cj 1 f1 Cd Safl d Q r L1. F? 1`' " .f -M! Y.
t I-ie pi_ib1 a. c hear.i n q schp d u-1 P d A►_i s t-19, 1993.
E3G-,A Pri-Dr t-D issLiance c-f a bi_t.z.ldinq per-rnit or ~.~t l:!-le rPquest of tl-le
Cciun V y En q i. nee r in cc-njunct ir-In w.i t h~ ~Coun t y R~~~ ad P ro.a ect/ RoacJ
Impr--_+vGment Da.stricty wliichever actrr-Ii~ cc-mes first:
E36 Applic-cint sh~-Z11 dedic~.~tP 10 f t c-n Val ley Way fc-r riqht way
purposes, beqinna.riq at the Pt-~st ~ropk=r ty 1 ii-ie ~.~nd contin+_ting t~ ~
SLt1 1iv cz n R-Dad.
PY'1oY' to YC:'lec~~e c+f c bu1.ld1f1Q peY'fYilt ---Il`' i_iae ---If the pYo(>E°Yty ~s
pr~~ pos(? d;
E-443 Ac cess per-mxts fior approarhes to tF•te C~~-unty Road System shaI 1 be
obtained from the County Enqineero
~43 App7. i cant shal l submit for approva1 by the Spol. ai1e C~DLtn ty
En g.i. neer roa d 9 drax. ri c-ige an c# ae r_ es sa jo1ai-is.
F45 A p~.~rE inq plan and traffic circLtlaticin plan shall he sLtbmitted
~.znd apprc-ved by the Spol-~..~ne Coi_tnty Enqineer. The desi.gn,
1coCat1 on and arrangement ofi parE. a nq ,ytal 1s shal l be in
accorr.1ance witF, stanclard englneerinq practicesu Pavinq or
ss ur• f ac i n q s aNprovec1 by t f ie Ca ountyEnq 1. nee r w.i.1 1 b e reqi_tired
fciY' c-in y poY' t1. o!'i of the pY o)t? G t W h1 C h 1 si to t? e ---)C C i_t p1 ed i-ii'
traveled bv vehicles
E48 -rhe c:c-nst:ructxc-n ----f ttie roadw~.~y im~rc-,vements. st~.~teci herein St-ia7. 1.
• be acc-Dmplisl-~ed as appr-Dved by the Sp---,E-ane C~~iunty Eriqa.neer.
~
paQE'
~50 The C-Dunty Engineer haa ii~siqnated Typica1 lRnadway Section
hlumher Twor__C211Prt~~t~_At~tera.~.~l s~:as~d<~r~d f~~r t-~e zr~pr~M+vemen~: ~~f
Val1ey__Way which is ac1jacer~~ tr-1 the pr~~~posec:J developmentn This
k,,lj.1 1~recluire tt-ie adcla.ta.c-n of approximately 10_1.= ft. o-f aspha1 t
along the frontaqe cif tF►e clevelopment arid exiendiri-_to_Si-tll.ivan
Road. CurbznU and siciewa1l mi_tst aIao he construc:ted.
Evl Al. 1 reqLtired zmprovemeryts _>haL 1 ronform to ttie current Sta-te of
Washzncaton Stanrlard SpQea.ficaticins for Road anci Braidqe
ccinstf Uction and other applicahle ccounty staridards anc1/cir
adt_-pted reso1utions pert~.~lning pertaa nz nq t-T- Rclad Staridards and
Stc-rmwater rlariac~ement in effect at tI°ie date of conC:,truction,
unl~~s cttherwise approved by tfie Cr„_tnty Cnqineero
E55 Rc-adway standardsy typical roadway sections -ancf clrairt~~cie p].an
Y' e(a u1. Y ef i i eI, t5 ai'' ~ foun d Jl. i"1 Spol' aI~ ~ Boaf d of Cc-unty C: om m i r sion e r 5
resol ution 80°1592 as amended and are applicable tc, thtis
propci5a1 m
E%58 hlc, cons t r i_t c t ion work i s to be per formed w i t hi n t heex1 5tX f'1 qcir
prc~ po5ed riq ht iri f wayi_i n t a 1 a perm z t F, as b e e n i ssue d b y tI-ie
Coi_tn t y En q i neer. A1 1 wora- w i tti1 ri the pLtb 1ic r c-ad ri q ht l.--f way xs
si_tbject; t-D anspection and appr-Dval by the Gounty Enqineer.
E59 A11 r-eqLti red constr uction w.i. rha.ri the exista.nq or propc-sed plkblic
Y 1 ghi:, of Wa}/ 1 a tc- he C,= -tTl pZet E'd pi 1ciY tri t0"ie YeleaS E' of a
bi_illdinq permit cir a bcind in an amc-unt estlmated by the Caourity
Ei'1 Q l f 1 eel'' tiD C ciV 21~ thE..' C ~ ~ t of C ci11 sitruC tl c-l i cit'' l f Tl pl'' ciV etTi @ I~ ~ ~ shc7 l}.
be fi1erJ with the COUnty Enqa.neer.
E61 The Coitn1:y Ar teri;..~] Road Plan identlfa.es Ua11ey Way as a
Go11 er_ tcirAr- teria l a T he Exx. a tin g r ict ht-rIfi w a y w x cl t h of4C-) lemet
x.~ not consistent wa.th tFra-l; sppr_ified in the Plann :tn corder to
implertieriiJ the Arterial Road Plan, in acid.i.tic-n tc- the iTeqUa.red
riqhia of way dedication, a sl:rzp _~~f property 5 feet in widt!-I
~..~lonq thie Va11ey Way 'Ir-ontaqe shal l. ~e set •-aside in i-es~rve.
Tha.s property may be arqi_ta.red bv Sp-_Aane Ccl+_lnty at tl-ie time when
arter-a.~zl impr ovemEnts a-re macie to Va1 1ey Way.
E90 ThEa-re may exist uti1 a. ties, eL t i-rer ui1der qround or c-verFiead y
affecting th~ sub)ect properfiyj, includznq prclperty to be
cieciic~~~d or set asid~ for futurp <~~qLtisj-tai.cino 5p-DE;ane CoLRnty
c.~ S,UtTl y I-'i izi firl afl C 1. al iDbl1 Q cl t 1of 1 fo1'' iid)i_t 5 t(Fi et"t ~s or i°' eloC cl t1cof 1
r- eqar° dj. n q t!-iese !_c t i 1iti es. App1 i c antshctu1 d c I-iecl: w ith t; he
~.app11cjtb1e utility purveyor and the SpokanP t;ounty Engineer to
dntermine wf-tetl-jer ~.~pp].icant or the 4_tta.la.ty a.s responsa.ble f---Ir
i'
p c"1 ge
cli~ )Lt5ti1f1C!"it oY t''E'ZoCatal.oCl Co5t5 anC~ tc. fTic..ke ~.~rrangemPnt~ for afly
nE' C e~'isct 1'' y wcn'r` ~ .
SpeciaI Coilditions:
A C:-r.iznty R~~~ad Pro,aer_t is ci_trrently rAnderway f-rIr SLtl'livan RoarJa
apoE.ane Cc-unty wxll he acqi_tLr.;Lnq 75 feet frc-m centerline SuLlivan
Road to c c-= nstruct t r~ e proposerJ p ro)e c t. The r i clr~ t of wa'r` Plan was
for ma1 1 y ~dopteci bythe Coi_tn t y E n g ziiPer s p e r t I-te S pir4• ne C-Dunty
fRc-ad Stanciarr1s» Tha.s wi11 efitect the site plan as si_tbmxtted for this
re: one, ~.:-~I ter` t ic-na wa 1 1 need to be dr-Ine to the sxte pZ an at the time
iN-f bLtildinq permit to reflect th.i.s acquisition by Spokane COUnty on
t hai: por t a. c-i-i c-f the s ite ra l~.? nthat is cii_ttsid e t has r e-zone r e qLt est.
/
DFF T CE OF THIE CCIUhI? lf E'hiGI hIL ER
SRCJk' AhlZ COiJhil"Y, WASH I NItaTC7N
J un e 9, 1 9'=J31
To: 5p-_A-anP Co+_inty Planriinq Depar tment (Ci_irrent Planninq
Acimini7trator )
From: Spo6: ane C:c-unty Enqineer 9 s Depar tmpntQAA.
Subacact: Cc-nditioris of Approva1 Zorie Cahange iuo: Unassignec1
APP 11 Cc7f1t5 hlafi)~-' RofYla`j.~AssoC . r
Se c t i-Dn 13, Township~25~N9 Rarige '4 EWM
re:_Zoning
Tri e fc-~ IloW 1 f1 g "CoI"1 d1 t]L o(15 of AF7 F] Y cnV a1" fc-Y thE' aboV G Y 2 fieY f? f't C E'd ao17 e
ch~.~nqe arQ 5i.tbmitted to the SpoE.ane County Plani7inq Depar-tmertt
i n c.t usic-n i n the Desiqn Rev i e w h`I eet x. n q sci-ie dLt 1 e cl Jun e_9p 1993.
E36A Pr-i-Dr toD a.ssLtance r_-f <a laux ldlnq permit cir at the reqi_test of t!-ie
Courit y Fnq-i-neer in con.a un c t ic-n wit h a C: -Di_tn t y Road F'r ojer_ t! Roa d
Improvement District, whichever action comes first:
E136 Appla.carit sFia] dFr1x.cate 10 ft cin Val?ey Way for riql-it of way
p ur p oses .
PY.I. oY' to Yei E? ase of a t] Ll 1ld1 nQpE 1'' Rl 1t oi`' i_i5e c-f the p1`' c-p E' Y t y cl S
prop~~ised :
E40 Access Wermits f-Dr approaches tc. the County ~-Dad System sria11 be
obtained from the Coi_inty Enqineerp
E4; App1.ii_ant shal 1sLtbmi u ior aPPrciva.l by tfne SpoE•ane County
Enqineer roady c#rainaqe and access p1ansp . >
E ZZM R Zican tsha1 1 si-Ab or apprc-va1 by t I-ie 5pc4ane County
Ei1qirieer a I _ a1 th Di stra.c1: a detai1ed
Cof11b1.C1E?d ofl-_ seWc7.QP 5}lstPm plr:ti"1 c._~I'1 =~lY'~<3Cf~ WatF'Y Cj15posaL
~'.]lafl ¢oY' iQ entlY'L pl''i-ijeCt oY' j7oYt1o11 thPY~~-_- . ("Ie
cicve - )ment x.s phasecl, '
E45 A parE inq plan and traffir_ circLtlaticin plan sha1l be slibmitted
~.~nt~ a~~pt~~~vecf hy tr~e 5p~:~E..e~ne C,~,~_~nty Enginec~r. Th~e deszc~ilq
1ocatz.on and arrc-Anqemer-rt ---If parE inq stalls shal'1 be in
accor-ciance with standard cnqx.neera.ng practicesa F'avirig i?r
surfacinq as appr-_-ved tay t!-ie Coitr•ity Er•iqirieer- wi11 tae required
. p _R qe ~
foY afi'y` poY t l ofl of tFI e pY i--i) E C t tr,' tI 1 C h 1 S b~ ~ cupiE tj oY
traveled by vehic:l.es
E48 "fhe cons•tructic:-n of the r-oadway i.mprowements stated herein sI-ta11
be acciDmplished as approved by the Spo[ane County Lngi.neerA
F5(~) -rhe (:ounty Fnclineer has 1esiqiiated Typical Roadway 5ecti-Dn
Numlaer Tw,_-,,__g21jec tor_._Ar ter ia l_ 5tandard f-Dr th,e imprc-vemei~t of
Va112y_Wax which`is ad)acent tc- the pri_~pci5ed deve1.cipmentn This►
wi 11require the addita.c.in of apprcl-:x.mately 1Q)_- t2 ft. of ~1sr.aha1 t
alonq the fro,Intaqe of i:he devel-Dpment and extendxn5~_~llivan
Roa d. Curbin q an d s i dewa1 k. mi_t a t a1so be cc-n r t ri_icted .
E51 All reqLtired imprcivements shal.l c.onfoipm tc- the current atclte c-f
Wa=hingi:-Dn Standard Specificatic-ns f---Ir Road and Bridge
coristructic:-n and other appl i caiole ciDi_tnty standards and/or
~..~tiopted reso1+_ttions pertazninc3 pertaininc~ tcl Rclad Standards arid
Stor+mwGtter hlanagement in effect at the date ---If constructic:in,
unl.eas c-therwise appr-oved by the C-wiunty I=ncaineern
E; 5 P,oezc:lway standar(Jsv typica1 roadway sECtions anrJ drainaUe plan
Yeqi_1 ii" C f Tl eI`t t: 5a1'' e fcii_t n d 1 I~ SpoE•. af l~ Boa1" d c-if CoL! I"1 t)/ L~ of Tl f Tl 15 51 c--('i E' Y' S
re::> o1ut ion W80--1 59.y' a s a mende d z-kn d are app 1 Y c a b]. e tc, this
p rc~ pos a1.
E;FJ N~~~ cc-Pn s t r uc t ior7 worI. is to be perf-Dr med w ithin t heexistin q IDr
p rc-posed r.z ght of way i_ti~ ti1 a pe r m i t has b e e n assi_te d by the
CvLinty Enqineer. All wori wa.thin the pub7 zc ~-Dad riql-it Of way is
sub)ec t tcn .i nspe c t ic-i-i ai7rJ approv~.~ 1 by t h~~ ~ CountyEnq.Lneer p
E59 A] 1 reyu1rerJ c.onstrur_tion wittiin tl-ie existing or proposed pub1ic
r i g I-itof w a y is t-D be comp1eted pr tor to t I-je r e 1 e a se ofa
bLtildinq permit or a bond in an armount eatimated by the County
Enqineer t-D C-DVeY ti"IP_ C~ ~~t of ConstYuCt 1c-I11 ----Y 1fTiF3Yovements Si"ial 1
be filed wxth tfie C~~-unty Enaineer4
E90 T her e may exi s t i_i ti1iti. es, e z 'u-he r i_indP r groi_ii-id orov e r he~.~d q
aif'ecting the sitb.ject propPrty, inc1 r_tdxncl prc-per ty to Ge
d ed i rated or set Gzsici e f orf+jtijre a c quis i. t i. on o Spok• c ne County
assuf Tl ta ..~'a f ic-j fi irian cia1 G bl1gati+=-rl fo1'' ai:~ )ust f Tl Cl t5 oY' Y' elot at 1otl
regarding •these istilxtges. Applieant shoi_tld chec[ wii:h the
applicable ►_tti1lty purveyc-r zirzd the Sp-Dl-ai-ie GiDLinty Enqineer tr.,
determine whether appl xcant cir the uta.l ity is rP~pr-Iiisxble fcir
ca d,) ust tTi ent o1" t`' Glci(a c1 t1oI"1 C. o5 tj'. s ci il Cj ~iD f il a~:Parran qem e n ts foY an)f
i1eC~ssaY)/ WoY~ .
,
page .r-3
'
Special Conditzr-Iris:
A CoLtnty Road Pro)eet is cLtrrently 1_tnderway fcir SLillivan Road~
~po6•.ane C►~-unty wil 1 be acqui r-x.nq additional riqht c-f way to constri_tct
the pro~---Ised protJect. As yet ex~.~ct amoun~s of rlqht of way c-n
~ij1 livan f7-Daci i-~avEnot haeen determinedo This additiiDna] right cifi way
rieed wil I ef fect the present 'aa.te ~.7lany SpoE ane County wC-Uld
r-PCommend that this item be pLtt on ti-ie np-:t availt..~b1e agenda bi_tt a
c.h,anc1e in the =_,ate piari will be reqi_iired pri-wIr tc- the pLibl.xc
hear-znqn TI-~~ appli.eG~rit Ls advised tc, worl clc-sely with Gary Nelsc-n
of oi_i r DEa s1 q i"i Sec t; -Lon to re f Iec t t hie necessar y riclht of w a y con
Su1 1 iv an R o~.~ d on tFie s i t e p1 an ~ soon as i t is ad c-p t ed as a r i ght ---i f
wc-iy p)1~-xn.
~ .
~ -
~
. ~eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewerfleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 1 11:56:38 01 JUN 1993 °
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
004597 SULLIVAN RD 00.000 BMP of road U 19 GRAVEL 200
° 00.150 BALL DR U 19 GRAVEL 32
° 00.430 BELLE TERRE AV U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 240
° 00.750 36TH AV U 17 PAVED 20
° 01.000 32ND AV U 15 PAVED 200
° 01.240 SALTESE RD U 15 PAVED 20
° 01.340 27TH AV U 15 PAVED 200
° 01.500 24TH AV U 15 PAVED 20
° 02.100 14TH AVE U 15 PAVED 500
° 02.130 14TH AV U 15 PAVED 50
° 02.260 12TH AV U 15 PAVED 500
° 02.310 11TH AVE U 15 PAVED 50
° 02.410 9TH AV U 15 PAVED 500
° 02.510 8TH AV U 15 PAVED 62
° 02.580 CENTURY COURT U 15 PAVED 620
° 02.760 4TH AV U 15 PAVED 62
° 02.840 2ND AV U 15 PAVED 620
° 03.010 SPRAGUE AV U 15 PAVED 44
~eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) °
a aaaaaaeaaaaaaea~~~~~~~a CA Ici ci'ci aci ci cl ci cl cl aaaci ci cl ci'ci d acl cl cl cl ci ci ci cl cl ci ci a~~~~~~~~& ci ci CA a a a a a a aCA CA a(;
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page 0
ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewerfleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeei
°PAGE 2 11:56:59 01 JUN 1993 °
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
° 03.140 MAIN AV U 15 PAVED 440
° 03.260 VALLEYWAY AV U 15 PAVED 44
° 03.450 SPRINGFIELD AV U 15 PAVED 440
° 03.520 BROADWAY AV U 15 PAVED 64
° 03.680 MISSION AV U 15 PAVED 840
° 04.200 FLORA PIT RD U 15 PAVED 80
° 04.880 EUCLID AV U 15 PAVED 800
° 05.050 EUCLID U 15 PAVED 80
° 05.390 KIERNAN AV U 15 PAVED 800
° 05.910 UPLAND DR U 15 PAVED 44
° 06.020 WELLESLEY AVE R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 220
0
01 Records Processed o
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) °
fla a aa a aeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaCA CA aaaaci aaaaaaCA aaaaaCA aaaaCA a~~~~~~a ci ci CA aaq
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page 0
` , , ^
ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCReport Viewert~eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 4 11:58:08 01 JUN 1993 °
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
0 00.500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 200
0 00.770 MOORE RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
o 01.000 CONKLIN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 200
0 01.500 FLORA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
005115 VALLEYWAY AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 PAVED 400
0 00.110 MCMILLAN RD U 19 PAVED 40
0 00.130 MCMILLAN CT U 19 PAVED 400
0 00.320 HODGES RD U 19 PAVED 40
0
0
07 Records Processed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
$eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) °
fla aaA a aeaaaaaaea a aaaaaaaaaciaaciaaaaaaci aaaaaaCA aCA ci aaaaaaciaaCA aaaaaaa aace, ici aaaaaa aaca acig
a
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page
IqQ~ .
. .
2E- aa-Ci3
,
.
.
,
- ~ .
oIn ,
v .
. . . .
A-L
.
ti-
_ . ~
e
• tis' O~ No
SPUKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF PRIN7'ING
8/93 HEC Staff Report for ZE-28-93 Page 76
' FRpM :SPO CO. COMM I SS 10NEf TO : LiT : i 1 T Y SF3
:
TQ THE g0 RD OF COUNTY COMMISSlONERS
APPEAL FEE • $200
NAME: TpDAY'S UATE c9•Z 1-9 ~ .
~
;
AUDRES~ : 9. ia 7 We) ZtP CODE 99~0 ~Z
HOME r, 10NE: 44::~ 2 - 7400p, BUSINESS PHONE'
f-iFARlNC EXAMINER ACTION BEING APPEALEn
PfIELIMINARY SUBDlV1SION NAME
PRELIMINARY SUBpfVISiON NUMBER
7.ONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMB
DATE OF NEARIN(3 EXAMINER COMMITTEE ACTION
. ~
=71CjNAYURE OF APPELLANT
~ -_„(3NATURE OF AUTHORIZEb REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS -5;4-ote ezas .1-t1wPj/G.
YQUR REASONS FOR APpEAI
rz'o~~
- .
,
FOR OFFICE USE aNLY
Copies to: Planning Engineers Lnvironmental Health
~
Fee received: Check ~ Cash Receipt Number
Hearin~ ~N)ate
►y~' . ~ qrC . - + Jn't
'FROM:SPO C0. COPIMISSIONE, TO:UTILITY SPO SEP 1, 1993 3:12PM P.03
,
. ~
' SI'UKA,NE CU[7N'I'Y ~
11EATtl1Y(i LXAMINE1t (;UMMJT"['Irl?
t J.F FACT.-O . ;
~
1N'I'ROl)UC'l'10N
s
E
'!'1iis niatter h1s came Ucfore the I Icaririg I:xamincr Coixiniittee on Augtist 19,1993.
`1'lie rnei-iibets af the Committec prescnt Rte l Inrry Giblwns, GhKirpcrson, JKn Reuter ~
aud LunelZ IIauglit.
1'lt()1'()SAI.. !
,
'I'!ie sponsor, lawight IIttilie, reclur,e1s SpPr•nva1 Of a 7.c»?e RerlASSiCiczEion,1~lIC T1Ct. ~
l11-28-93, Trofti 13iban ItesidcntiAl-3.5 (UR-3.5) to C:dmrnunity Busincss (B-2)
witliin tlie Aquifer Scnsitive AieH Overlay Zoiie (I1SA)
ITINUINGS UF FAC;'I` ANI) C()N(:LUSIUNS
'1'lie properiy is getieralty loc:ateci Fouth of Rilt) Kdjncetit to Valley Way, approximztcly
250 rast of Sutlivan Road in ttie soutliwest 1/4 of Scction 13,'I'ownship 25 N.,
Ratigc 44 EwM, Spokane County, Wasliington,
2. ']'hc cotnmittee aclopts thc Planning 1)eJ>arttnent Renort as apart of this rccot•d.
3. 'i'hc cxisting 1F►nd uscs in the aiea ntc residczitial ancl commcrciai,
04 'I`he piaposed use is not compatible witli exisling tises in ttie area,
-05 Thc Coinntchc»sive Plan desjgnzttes this site as Urhan. '1'he Urbari categoa-y }s for thc
pur>>ase of clevclaping a"cily-ltke" environment w;tli various uses iricltidirlg
res'scleiitaal and ncigliUoihoad busiticss.
C6) '1'hc praposed zaiittg elc7cs not irnplemem Rnd eanfor:ii to the Coiiiprehensivc Plan,
7, 'f tie Ar-terjttt ltoad !'lan desigfintes w'alley Way as a Callector tlrterlal, witli ii
rccociitliended right of way widtli af 70 feet,
R, 'i'Iie existirig zoliiiif of tlie Ptopci-ty descritvd in die applic:ation is Urban aesidential-
3.5 (UR-3.5), prevlausly estublished As Agrleultural zoning in 1942 ayid reclassified
to Urbnn RcsidetitiAl-3„5 (11R-3.5) att Jatiuary 1, 1991 rursuatit to tlie Pragrarn to
Irnpleiiient the Spokatte County Zoriittg Code.
9. 7'he prQvisians of RCW 43.21C ('Tlie State Lnviroiiriiental l'alicy Act) have bccn
corlljllied wilh and s Detenni:iallon of Nonsigriificance was issued. 'I'he COtI1t11111P.e,
after indcpendent t-evlew, ltcreby adopls tiie DNS.
10. 'l'he legal mquixetnettt' for public 1iotiCe have been fu}f'illed.
,
11, Tlie owners of adjRCCnt lArids expressed disapproval of ttie proPosed usc.
~
;
, ~
FROM:SPO C0. COMMISSIONEf TO:UTILITY SPO `SEP i, 1993 3:12PM P.04
.
8/93 1 lLC Older for Ii?•28-9.3 1?tigc 3
~B 1) rx
'!'lie I IeRring 1?xanuner ComrlYittee, pursuHnt to the Rt?ove Findings of F-AG( and I~
Concltrsion, DF~NILS the aplAication of Uwlgltt Hume for the Zone Reclassificatiora
as ticscril3ed in (he am)lication ZU-2$-93. ;
Motioti by: Jan Reuter Seconded by; Ltinell Ilaught ;
Vote: (3-0) UN/1NlMOtJ.S 1'0 DENYZQNE RI2CLASSIMCA'1'lON `
FROM. UR13AN ItLSIULIV11AL-3,5 (UK-3.5)'I'U CC1MMtJN1TY
I3tJSINI:SS (B-2)
. Bi;AR1NC.~ ,4jvSlNPR CO MM' ' ' y
I1~1~I;13YA1"I'LS'I''1'0►'1'IlL AI3OV1's ),*1,NDINC3S, aItI7ER, ANIa VOTE
Chalrm
~ ~ .
I•TFj.fSPe: r ~
( ,
For WALLIS D.11UI313AIZU
~~~anning D'ircctor
B C~~~I~ W. PLI~ ~~SC~I~I
E T~'~an~icr
460193
Date
Piic-s»nl,t to County regulations, Aiiy itggrieveci paity has the risht ta arPeai this written
deC1S14n to tI1C SpOkAiie Cptltlly B0Ai-d af County Com»iissioncrs within ten (10) calendar
days of thc signing of this ordcr. Upon receipt af an appenl, a public hearing will be
schedetled. If you dcs,re to fife such an appeal, you must submit a wrltten appcal,
prefcrRbly ori iorrizs dcsigned fox siich purpose, to the Board of County Cvmmissioners,
W. 1116 Bt'ORdway, Spokane, WA 99260, along wlth a$200 processing fee piiyable to t1le
Spokane County 'IYeasurer,
If yoti have any questions, pxease calllhe planning DepArtment ai 456-2205.
, C'cZP ~25-13
, . .
ROBBRT A. ROSIER & CO.
Investment Real Estate
October 21, 1993
Mrrs. Ron Hornman and Gary Nelson - Cotmty Engineers
Mr. Wallis D. Hubbard - Director of Planning
Spokane County Plannirg Dept.
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Southwest corner Sullivan & Valleyway
' ZE-28-93
Dear Mr. Hubbard:
The property in question consists of six (6) parcels all of
which are owned by the same seller, Mr. Charles Williams
(deceased). RCNAX Associates, A Washington General Partnership,
which I represent and am a principal, has secured purchase rights
on the entire property since early this sumner. Parcels C, B, D,
H, & G are zoned B-2 pursuant to the coimty-wide zone change-over
tha►t was effective 1991. See Exhibit A. Parcel E, the subject of
the zone change is UR-3.5 and we seek B-2.
At the time oY our original inquiry into this property we
considered building a building immediately, and could have done so
without public due process on the currently zoned property. We
had planned on building up to the minimim set h,ack as shown on
Exhibi t B(A-1 s i te pl an At that t ime the Coimty Ersgineers ]azew
a►nd informed us that they were seeking to acquire 22 feet of
additional right-of-way to make a 62 ft. roadway from centerline
out of Sullivan Rd. We could have (and in hind-site should have)
gone ahead with this plan. Only after considerable debate did the
County Migineers f inal ly decide on an eveantua►1 75 f t. r ight-of -way
which will require them to purchase 45 ft off the west side of
South 613 Washington, Suite 102 9 Spokane, Waslungton 99204 • Telephone (509) 624-3777
A
~
parcels U, II & G. Tliis would liave put our new buildijig will►iii 10
fect of the i•iglit-of-way.
1lie atx3ve sceiiario illuslrales a lkypollielic:al Uut wliat
could-liave-heen situatioii. Wl►al is re11 Lowever, is if the zo»e
cloaiige reclues l i s (leni eJ o~k appeal, oc i f R(7lNAX were lu wi llulrawl
lhe appeal, tlie se) l ers nx)sl assurE-dly wi l l re--renl the liouses.
13y do iig su 1 lie CUun)ty lAr►gi »ecr itig llepar lmcii t w i 11 be obl iga L ecl iu
pay the teiiarits mUVirig rxpCIISES avid purclzase all itii•ce )ots (D, 11,
bz G) to makc llieir riglil-oC-wai,y expausioii cegardless of the aniutitil
ot' ri.ght-of-way nee(led. '11iis was clearly the situatioti br,.Core
KMAX cmne aloig At►d mvecl fur A ZOl1C cLSi►re on parcel C. t7iic:e
ItCMAX elected to agree lo piircliase all the parcels ajid oncc the
c;uun ty f i iial ] y c)ec i ded tv ac:qiii re 45 f t f or Su l l i vaui, i t 3eeiIIE',ci
c:cnq)e] l ing flud in facl ciui le logicll lhat a zone c:liaiige of p1rce1
C lo I3--2 wuu Id mtike seuse f raw a cc~iiimir►i ty pl awiiiig, puVl i c
itilerest poirit of viEw. We liad absolutr.ly iio idea the zoiii»g
wou! d bc clcni c;d. 1n 1 i gli t of tLe f ac: t tlia t we liave tLi s htige
projec:t (ri•ed N~yers) that wns zaiied [3-2 riglit next door that goes
lhree (3) l imes f ur lhcr eas t tl►aii parce 1 C, atid o U►cr zoiic c:hanges
to the nor ils of ilie sula jec l on the eas l s i de of Sitl l i vwi tlza_t
ex LGricl as f ai• ea:; t, I was as lo» i shcJ ta 1carn tloa t llie b.as i s ror
cleitial wa:; slrict conslruclioi► of Ltie "General Guide" pulicy
aspec.l of Llie Ccniq>rcl,ensivr_ Lancl Use plau wliic:li is contrar-y Lo
estaVl islied law ptirsuajkt to I3iir.)1 vs. 13reoerton.
IVlial's more, our neighlsor la lhe soulli, Smi lli' s Fur»i ture,
wlio purchasecl a parccl frum FrE:d N~yers, IiAd lu ad just llieir xiortli
hu i lcliiig 1 iiie because oP our spl i t zaiiilig tr(sn plrcel I3 to parcel
E. Xf we coulcl l,ave gut ten parccl E zoiied 13-2 the Smi lli' s
buildijq; cuulJ liave slrAighlenr,d oul tllc Iiorllk wall aud cleatied 14)
thei r bui lcli.iqr conf igurat iviis, i f riot everk aoved tltr.i r bui lding
s i l L ing eas ter 1 y Lu aclcl the se t-bac:k f rcxn Su11 i vaii.
As it turiis out I:xhil,it C(A-1 Site plart) sl►ows !1!e westr.rly
Smi lli's biii lcling Ht IuU f t Proin the cE:iilerline of Sull ivaii or 25
f t from tlie caIIJkty 04girieer's proE3osea riglil-of-way. '1'liat
It(]MAX ASSU(:IA'1'LS P/UGE 2 10-21-93
.
Aciniiiislralive exceplion sE:t-bac:k very clr.fiiiiiely affects tlte
sub jecl pi•uper Ly's proE>c:r ly r iglkls. Tlic bul k aiid scale oF the
Smi tli' s bui ldiiig so far wes t Altd iior tli ef f ec: i i vely cuts of i' the
t~idlcling )si te at the suutlawc:st coriir.r uf the subject si te. We
ltaci watited the liui ldiic i n the soulliwesl corner to s.voi.d tc:uf f i c
proLl Eiiiti i n lo tlje s i le .uicl a11 ow For as anich vi s ibi 1 i ty to lhe iir
] iue s lc,i•e. As the Cumkty pl annrrs have app»rmt ly agreecl the
sr~nsc
selbac:k cosisideralimi Lu Siui L1i's arrects the subject, the
eotisi deral iun to a laiai I di ittr, s i te wutil d he expeeted f or llie
subjeet. Tliis eoncli tiori yuti woulcl agreF is mmr.h ft-ivuraVle lhal
Llte averlecl scenar•io of 1:xlti.bi t I3!
Ceiillcneii, ll►e poiul oP all this is thal 1 Iiave aL all timcs
a L t(mq)led to t:►ke al 1 par t i es into coiisi.deral ioii. 'Ttie tliwar ted
zone cliw►ge has aireacly Ler.n clelriruenlal lo my neiglilior, n~uraely
Snu lli' s. rur, tl►er , to (leny tl►e zone on apl)cia1 seeias to scrve no
piiVlic iiileresk, 1nJ wuuld be a gceHl c:u:;l Lo llte couiily Gegineers
orrice. Your stArr's positive suppart lo suppoi•t ilie zoiie cLm►ge
uli appr.al wota1J be apprecialc:d. l.f you Iiave questiu»s, please
ca11..
Very Tr•uly YUUrs,
tujbcrtl,~:;; er
II1~
01c:losuce: T.x)iibi ls A, I3, C.
RMAX ASSOC:IATCS l'AGr 3 i Q-2l -93
' l'IV
l ~ L 1 c ,
'
I, ~ .~,1 t, 1 4t 1Y"•1~7~ ' I
• A~ V~
161..~.~ (f
L . - -c
1~sr # ~ I l00 ( i o ~0 1f s~ cn
. ~
t ~ ID @ ~
/
as
@ 10,71 C&)'
~
f5
~
' 1► ! ~ ~ ~
io~.a ;oe
~
j--
~ , - - - ' ~ ~
$ 2 ~ I3 : ~
r
~
1000,
• ~
~ . 7-'
449) / / ~ < <
.000, ~ .
~z 4e ~ , , . ►
l '
~ ~ ~i~ / ~ tv/ • _ ~ •
4db- JS7
V - -foo, . I ~a e0 3o' EXHI$IT A,,.
r ! ~ I _
WN ITE B1RCHfS MM << .
N ,rF In 13543J6001 flwu M14543-6(
~ I ~ ~ ~ , - ~ A
J ~ i. ~ ~4 I
13
'
U~v .
~
w
.
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and SPqtion 1,1.10.230(3)
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-28-93
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassif'ication from Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) to Community Business (B-2) for a restaurant and retail building.
APPLICANT: Romax Associates
c/o Charles Williams
South 613 Washington
Spokane, WA 99204
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of
Sullivan Road and Valleyway in the SW 1/4 of Secrion 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIlVG DEPART'14NT
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is DQI required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This .
infomlation is•available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at
least 15 days frorn the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., August 17, 1993, if they are intended to alter
the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR
By: Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Planning Department
- 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 , e
DATE ISSUED: 7_R0 43 SIGNATURE: tAp
~ -
CCNPAENIS G INVIlZCNME~NTAL OO~TCE~ZNS ARE WECjOlVIE AT 1I~ H[FARIN
' G.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOK:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10)
calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal
must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact
the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Deparnnent of Ecology (Olympia) •
2. WA State Department of Health
3. Spokane County Health District
4. Spokane County Engineer's Office
5. Central Valley School District
6. Fire District No. 1
7. Vera Water and Power
8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
9. Spokane County Parks Department
10. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
11. WA State Department of Transportation
12. Spokane Transit Authority
.
,
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10,230 -1-
, . SPOlC1lItE ENVIROtOtfNTAI ORDINIUICE
' (MAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1)
Enviromaental Checklist
F11e No.
Purpox of Checkltzt:
The State Envlronwr►tat Poilcy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCM. requlres atl goverrwental agencies to consider the environiaental irapacts of a proposal
before aeking Atcisions. An Environaental Imqact Statenent (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the Quality of the envirors.ent. The purpose of th/s checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identlfy impacts froci your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid imQacts from the proposal. 1f it can be done) and to help the agency decide rhether an E1S is required.
Instructionz for Aqpltcants:
This environmental checklist asks you to descrlbe sooe Castc tnfortoation abw t your proposal. Governmental agencies use thls checklist to determSne
whether the envtronaental iapacts of your proposal are signlflcant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questtons briefly, with Lhe most
precise info►9ation known, or give the best descriptton you can.
Vou rwu t ansver- each questton atcurately and carefully, to tAe best of your knowledge. In raost cases, you should be able to answer the questtons
frow your own observatiorts or project plans wfthout the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a questton dces not apply
to your proposal, vrite 'do not knw' or 'does not apqly.' Coeplete ansrers to the qwsttons now auy avoid unnecessary delays later.
Sone questions ask about governwental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline. and landmark deslgnations. Artswer these questions if you can. If yau
have problews, the goverrniental agenctes can assist you.
The checklist questtons apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do theu over a period of time or on different parcels of land.
Attach any additional lnforutlon tAat will describe your proposal or its environnental effects. The agenty to whlch you submlt this checklist rnay
ask you to enplaSn rour answers or provide additional infonaation reasonably related to deterntning if there inay be significant adverse liapact.
Use of checklist for coonpro,hct propouls: Cornplete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions iaay be answered 'dots not aDDlY*
IN 11DOITION, couqlete the SUPPLE?SENTAL SHEET FOR NOMPROJECT 1lCTIO?IS(Part 0).
For nonpro3ect actfons. the references Sn the checklist to tAe words 'pro3ect,' 'applicant.' ans 'property or site' should be read as 'prOposal."
•proposer.• and 'affected 9eographit area,' resDettlvely.
A. BJICKGROUf10
1. 'Iaoe of proposed project, if appltcable: ~h'~ ~('f°~ I,~i(SS ~~~Gt 1 L~-~ ✓1~ I/~~ r x.t.✓~
f~/' \ .f+
6Li(J G~l FG<.l, `J7 , !/L.) Q - 3 ~ S 1 tO 1' J ►'1/l,h/t l1„+'! (+1/1 ~ I .1 SI 2~
.
2. Nawe of Applicant• 7 4 y
✓
3. AdAress and phone msnDer of app l icant or contact person: /v q'/Q/ /w/,
4. Oate checklist prepared
S. Agency requesttng checklist•
6. Proposed tining or schedule (lncluding phasing, if appllcable)
~
r
f
~
i
,
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expanston. or further attivity related to or com etted with thls prooosall If yes, explain.
b. Do you orn or have optlons on land near0y or aEsacent to thls proposal' If yes, explaln.
~/~S , S~~ w,0s A~.~y <~;
~~td I`s 0 ~ e d - Se~ ~r~.~G ~o~.!
8. List any envtronaental infonsetton you know about that has been prepercd, or will be preparM, dSrectly n lated to thls proposal.
,
Rev.2/1/88 1 ~
, spotAna EMswVOWNri►L oRnnNeRCE ~
(vAC 197-11-960) Sectloe 11 10.230(1)
aAQG10QaD (caetimud)
9- Do 7ou kna rhettur applicacioas are pending for goveraa~atal approval• of other proroula direetly affecting che property covered by your
propoia17 If yes, explain
/V O
10. Liat ao7 govarnmcc approvaL or 9eralt• that vill ba aeeded fot 7wr proposal, if lmow
/ ~ . /~,fi~'~S~ ' ~ {f//L /1~/.S ~ ~~Uc/ ! Qf/P,S A~
J ~
4 -74b✓'
11 Glve n Drief, cmplete description oi your propo"l, ineluding the propo"d wes and che sise ot the pcojecc end •ite. "hece ere eeveral
questioos later in this checklist chac aak you to deicribe earcain upaet• of ywr proposal. You do not need to repeat those anevera on thie
page
o ~ ~.c res ~ c~a~ ~v a ~ ~x•s~i.~q / ~.~'c~~r~s ,~r a~
P9t1eV 1,6A 4' 5/~ '101a
v~ ~ t~ r'Cro.~c~ •
1: Locacioa of che propoeal Clve sufileisnt irtEotaatlon for a peraon co understand the precise lou tion of your proposed pro,fect, lncluding a
screec address, ii any, and •ectioa. covnship and rangs, if knovn. If a proposal vould occut over a range ot area, provide the range or
boundaries of che aica(a). Provide • legal descripcfon, •lte p La, vicinic7 oap, aod topoQraphic sap. Lf reaaonably avai L ble uhile you
ahould tuhaic aay pLna raQuired b7r che agency, yw •re not requirsd to dupliuta oaps or detallsd pLns sulaitted vith eny per=ic appllcation
re L ced co chia checklist
~
,
~
13 Doea che proposed actloe lle vithln the Aqulfer Seeultive Area (ASA)' :'1r General 5ew r Secvlce Areat :he Priority Sever Servlce Aree" 'he ~
Ci[y of Spokane' (See Spolcane County'• ASA OverL y Zone ACL s to[ boundariea) ~
4
!
i
.o ae COMLX'LD BY APPLICAN'[ '
B. PNVIEORMIR^..AL EI,EPQ.y'f5 ^
Evelwtlon For ~
1 Ageney Use Only
a General deecripclon of che eice (circle oc►e) [ L t, rolling, hilly, steep elope$, sountainws,
ocher
b 'Tet La che eceepeat alope on the sice (approxlaate psreent •lope)'
c uha[ general types of eo11e are Eound on the •ite (for exanple, clay, saod, gravel, peac, oue4)' ?
If you unov the claseiflu tioa of agrieultural •oila, spaeify thes and note aey prioe fars Lad E
v~DcltwL ~
d. kre there surface indicaclom or hlstory of uru table •olle in the iumediate vicinity• If so, • ~
describe.
. j
r
2
- V
SPOKJINE ENYIRONMEtITAI OROINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1)
' B. E1IVIROIMENTAL QptEtIT'S(coMlnued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
e. Describe the purpoze. type, and approximate q w ntities of any filling or grading proposed.
1ndScate zource ot fill.
_ n~ .
•
f. Could erosion o a ur u a result of clearin9. construction, or use' If so, generaily descrlbe. ~
~v ~/~/ev ~ ra v~
g. Abaut what percent of the slte w111 be covered with iapervtous surfaces after project construc-
tion (for exanQle, asphalt or buildirtgs)?
h. Proposed neasures to reduce or control erosion. or other lnpacts to the eirth, 1f •ny =
20 ~ /'~~r~-i~5 ~'vr~;~ S~~s .
v -
2, AiR
a. What type ot enissions to the air ww ld result froa the proposal (t.e.. dust. auLanobile, odors
industrial, wood sanke) during constructton end when the projett is tonpleted? If any. _
generally describe and give approximate quantltes tf known.
I
L~~ H y ~o»s~'~c.~'~'I -~P,a e~vrr~ ~2°~ ~.rrl/.~'sibm5 ~
e. 'u
b. Are there any off-stte sourtes of ernissiorts or odor Chat may effect your proposal7 If so,
generally describe. i
4/04 " //vL~iyL J ~✓Z°GL /~~C~/G~'S ,
.S(~vz'VE i. t-Sii~/ ~
I
f
I
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emtsstons or other trepacts to air, tf any ~
N/if~/~,~'I~ i9 ~~!//Yl S!/✓TR C~~~ rOYYI/.7/f'Q /7!~ ~
~U iSLf ~ J~./~/JC~ vl~~~~S • ~ ~
U 1
~
3 uATER ~
a. Surface
(1) ts there any surface water body on or Sn the lawediate vicinity of the site including year• ~
round and seasonal streaAS. saltwater. lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type anE ~
provide names. If approprlate, state what ztream or rtver it flows into. ~
/1l/n ~
~
~
(2) Will the prosect require any work over. in, or ad,jacent to (within 200 feet) the described
raters7 If yes, please describe anC attach available plans.
/Y /49 -
3
SPOZAJM ERVIROZ4?Si= OYDIRAHCS
(~aAc 191-11-960) seccion u.10.230(1)
• B. LNVIRORMEH'LAI. B.EM?';5 (eontinued)
Evaluatlon For
Agency Use Only
(3) Estisace tht uount of Eill and drsdge wterial tlat vould be plu ed in or renoved from the
eurface .racer or vetLad• and iadlcate the area of the site ttsat vould be •ffected. Iedlcace
the aource of fill mterial.
/V14-
~
(4) Vill the proposal reQuire •urfu e water vi[hd nw 1e oc diverviorts'. Civs • gensral descrip- '
tion, purpose, and appTOxlaate quaot![laa. 1f tnovn.
~Yv
(S) Does the proposal lie vichin • 1"ear tlood plain'. Lf •o, note loutSnn on the site p Ln.
A/v
(5) Does the propoaal involve an7 discharges of vu te naterial• co suriace vaters? If so,
deecribe the type of was[e and antlcipated voluae ot disclu rge
D Ground:
(1) Vill groundvater be vlthdravn, or vill vater be diochacged co groundvater, C1ve general a
descripEion, purpose, snd •ppro:iw ce Quaotlcies, if lmovn ~
f~i'~ cSJ~ . S r~~~ ~✓C'i / s9CC~i+~ ;
1
~
~
,
f
(2) Deacribe vanta eaterial chat vill be d1scAarged leto the grouad trom •eptic canks or ot!►er ~
saoltary vuce trutaaat faeility. Oescribe the general •ise ol the hrstm, the number of
housea co be served (if applieabla) or cl+e oumDer o[ ptrsons the a-yatee(s) are erpected co
aerve ca~~
(1) Describe any srsteas, other than chose ` designed for the Aisposal ot aanitary vute,
inscalled for the purpose of dlscharging [luid• belov the ground •urface (includa• eyoras• such e• chose for the dispoul o[ •tose vater or draloag• from floor drains). Dascrlbe the t7pe of (
eystem, the aooun[ of oaterlal to be dlsposed of through the •ystau and the Cypes of mterials ~
likely co be dlsposed of (includina material• vhlch may enter the sysc e inad w rteatly chrough
•plllc or as a result of firefighting actlvitlot)
(4) 4111 anr chmieal• (especially orgenic solvents or pncroleua fuels) De stored !a above-
ground or undergrouad otorage taoka? If so, vhat t7Pe• and Quaecitia• of mcarials vill be
atored'
./[!~9 .
4 ~
. \ .
\J
SPOrAt7L !11"VIlOZQCOM/3. dYDIH/114CE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 230(1)
, S. LRVIAONlMAI. II.EM22iTS (contiaued)
Evaluation Por
Agnocy Use Only
(S) uhat pmteetive meaeuree vill be taken [o lnaure that leaiu or spillo of •ay chemieals
etored or w ed on site vill no[ be slloved to petcolate to groundvatar (Chis lneludes eaaiuree ✓ ~
to keep cAenical• ouc of dls➢osal •7stes• descriDed ln 3b(2) aod 3D(3)?
~[7`~ _ SGCf - ,
C. water Runoff (lacluding storn vatec)• bo
(1) OascriDe the •ouree of nmoff (ineluding stora vacer) aad se[1od of collectioa and dispo"l
if any (laclud• quanticies, if kaovn). Yheza vill this water flovt Vill [his water flov lnto
other veters' If •o, daseribe.
v ~
(2) :Jill any cheiicnls be stored, handled or wed on the •ite le a locatlon vMre a spill or
leak vill draln co surface or groue►dvater or to a scors voter dispo"l syste dlseharains to
surface or groundwcer'
/(4d ~
(3) Could vante asterials enter ground or surfac• v tersi If so, generally describe
/~l 0
d Proposed nusure• to reduce or control surface, grwnd, aad runoft water Lspaecs, tf •oy (lt
c che proposed ac[Soa lln• vithlo [he Muifer Sensitlve Aru be •specLally clur on explawtions
r relatiog to facilitie• concetnlag Soctloos 3D(4), 3b(5). •nd 3c(2) of this cMekllBt) ~
~ GS /'P Ov /i'c a~' L~ ~ S . ~ • I
e'9 4-
~-/7.~ 74 S J~~~ ~S • ~ r ~
~
4 euvrs '
a rheck or clrcle type of vegetatlon (ound on ths slte•
Y deciduous tree• alder, maple, aopen, other. ,
evergreen cree fir, cedar, pinc, other
X shruDs
x grese
pascure
crop or graln.
vet soil pLncs, cactail, buttereup, bullrush, •kunk ciDbage, otAer i
water plancs. water lllly, eelgrame, ollfoll, othec
othec cypes of vegetation.
e
b Nhec kind and asount of vega u tion vill be rsoved or •lteredt @
itg► • '
0
i ~J
c Llst [hreatened ot endangered •pecla• lmovn [o De on or nest the si[e
d Propooed landscaping, use of native p Lats. or ocher ee uuras to presarve or nnhance w ge[acion : (I~'. • ~r' ~
on che •ice, if any• JI 1~ vU r/~
Vv ' ~ V v
o-
S
d5~Z
7-
~
SPOKAlIE ENYIROMMfIfTAI OROIMANCE
, (MAC 197-11-960) Sec2ion 11.10.230(1)
B. EHYIROIWENTAL ELE?lE)(TS (cantinued)
Eraluatlon For
Agency Use Only
5. ANIMALS
a. Clrcle any birds en0 animals which have been observed on or neer the site or are kn wn to be on
or near the slte
blyds' hawk. Aeron. eagle songbir~s~ other: ~
mammals• deer, bear, elk, beaver. other:
fish: bass, ulmon. trout, herring, shellflsh, other:
other, • /_~G
b. llst any threatened or endengered spe~ies knw n to be on or neer the site.
~
c. is the site part of a migration route' If so, exPla1n. ~ ~ .
,
d. Proposed raeasurcs to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any:
5. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. Nhat kinds of enerqy (electrtc. naturai gas, rood stove, solar) wtll De used to aeet the
the completeE project's energy needs' Oescribe rhether it w111 De used for heating, sanufac-
turing, etc. i
~-/Gr'-~LL`T _ ~/J~~~sr~~G~~us_ ~~i~P 1 • `/~P~~'j~
i ~ Cl
b, woulC your praject affect the potential use of solar energy by aQjacent prope K tes' If so,
generally describe ~
~
,
. ~
i
3
c What kinds of energy conservation feetures are included tn the plans ot thi5 propozal7 List ~
other proposeE neasures to reduce or control energy lmpacts. 1f any• ~
Gt~ V / ~ ~ e~~
.~Oryt l'07//~9CS i~i/,J //~'lCt~( O"YI .S! K-
'T7/!'h°
i
7. ENYtRONMENTAI HEALTH 6
a. Are there any envlronmntal heelth hazards, lncluding lnposure to tozit cheni1ca15, rfsk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous wdste, that could o a ur as a result of tA1s proposal' lf so. ~
describe. f
~I~D t
+
~
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
~
6
sror.eIM ENVIzoNMuM oInINnscx
(ttAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10 230(1)
E. ElfPIROtK.'fffAL EIBQIPP3 (contlnued)
Lvslwtioe Por
Agency Use Oaly
E2NIRONMEIT:AL REAL7H (contiaued) -
(2) Proposed oeaoures to reduea or control savirommntal hsalth hasards, if an7:
,112!
C
b. Noise:
(1) w!►at types ot noire e:isc in tlu aru vhich may affeet your project (for ensple traffic, t
equipsrnt, operaclon ocher?
(2) Whac t7De• aad level• o[ aoise vould be crnated b7r or asaocLted vith ths projtcc oa a
ehort-ceca or • lons-tarm baeis (for exuaple: trsffic, concructioa. oparacion. other)' Iodicate
vhat hours aoise vould come frnn the •ite.
~ - 6e, 4 / ` e., 41--rS~iK.I J 7~
/c~~5
(1) Proposed oa,asure co reduce or cantrol noise Lapaets, if aoy•
~~7 vrYl v✓I.j~S ~r~ ~ a s~ -
B la'1D AND SWORELIIIE USE /
a t~hac 1s the current we ot the site and adjacent propercies' 1~i~ f'7~
b. ttes the site Deen used for •grlculture' I[ •o, destriDe
ivU
c DescrlDc any s[ruttures on the slte.
U ~
~
d Will any e[ructuces be denollshed' It •o, vhich? ~P ~ S u~d (J.~_
c.i
e V`iec lo the eurreet :oning classifieacioa of [he •itei 3•.5` V 1r{/!/Lvi ~'~S'~~~h ; i,"L ~,`~j
1
f tfiat 1s che current emprehensive pLn designacioa of the •ice' ~Z7_-'>>/7 /Lr !
g. If applicable, vhat 1• the current shoreline aaa[er proQrn deslgoatlon of the site'
h Has an7 part of the site been clsuified as ae 'eaviroussnta117 woAitive' •rea' If so,
epecify
i Approximately hov maay people vould reside or vork in tke complacsd proSect't .
, 7
~ SiOrARE IDlVIIIonffRM OFiDIKAHCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) • B. ER9'LRONl41rM EI.EMERiS (contiaosd)
°valuatlon Por
I►aency Use Only
j Approximately hov nan7 psople vould the eonpleted project diaplaeet Av
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduee dlsplacmenc iapaecR, if anT: C ~
Nf~17C~ .
1. Proposed measures co ensure rha proposal is coapatible v1t6 ezisting •od pro}eeted Lnd uses sod
plans, if any:
'ew.) T7T'- S 04 C~
1,~~ ~ .✓~~r ~ ~l ,t~°
9 NOUSING
a Approaimitely hw many unit• vould Se provlded, i( anyt ladlute vtetl+er high-, aiddle-, or
lorineone howing.
b Approsioately hov oarty units, if any, vould be elidnatad? Indlcace vFtittar high-, oiddle-, ot
lov-lntoae housing.
v
c ProposeA measures [o reduce or eoattol housing ispaccs, if any:
10 AESTIiE'ICS
a uhat 1s the ul]est height of any proposed •crucwre(@), aot Sncluding •ateeaus? Vhat 1• the '
principal exterior building oaterial(@) propomed' r
~ •v
, I
~
b tlhet viev• in the lemediace viclnity vould De •ltered or obscructedf ;
/7v J~ e - ( el~ S SGo C , , , >Pi~ 1~,, J 4
~
c Propoeed measures Co reduce or control aas[hetic ispacts, if aoy {
..~P S~~G~~-~~t ~ t`~ ►'~°co~ . f
i
~
11 LICH': AND Cl.ARE ~
a '11ut type of llghc or glaTe vlll the proposal pcoduce? :lhsc tiae of da7 vould ic salnl7 occur'
IU~- /:~GLhKs--- • / ~
b. Coul[ or gLre fros the firLished proSset be a safec7 lusard or lnterfere vith ♦Lwi
/ 4/p .
c. Nhat existing off-site •aurce• of light or gLre eay affecc youz proposa11
r
d Proposed measures co reduce oc con[rol llght and YLre Lpacts. Sf aay:
z1/e,
~ -~~c, ~c ~ . SC ✓'C~r1i • 'U~~"' -
6
SPOtl1lfL MTIBD'FMlAL OBDDIANCE
(WAC :97-11-960) Seetian 11.10.210(1)
41
' B. EMMOMMM BMMNtS (coctlaatd)
Evaluatlon Por
Ageacy Uee Only
12. RBCRL A210N
a. Vh&t deiigaated aad inforaal reczu tlooal opporcimltie• ara in the imediaLe vlelnlty2
D. Yould the propossd project d1sp Lca any n:isting ceeraational uses? If so, daseriba
!
C. Proposed su au n s to reduee or control lapacts oo recreation. includic►a raeru tiorAl opportuni-
cies co De provided by the projecc or appliunt, ii •ny:
N ~~Yl P
l
13. HIS:'ORIC AND CULTIJRAL PRLSERVA':ION .
A. Are there any places or obJsecs lis[ed on or proposod for oatiooal, stat• or local pTessrva-
tion reglsters know to be o0 oc cezt to the sitst If so, generally describa. ~
/V U
b. Generally deseribe an7 laadsarke or evidanc• ot hiscoric archaeolosical. se L ati(ie ot culcural
laportance lmovn to De an os nszt to the sics.
/✓irn
t Proposed oeasuTes to raduce or concrol lopacts, if aar•
14. TRAI7SPOR-ATION
a Identify public street@ •nd highvay• serving the slte aed descrlbe proposed acce u to the
exlatiag street syst m Shoroe site plans, it any.
~ v(/ S ~G//Lr~L/ 4S//'C~
r~~o•,,~
t
b. Is eite currently ssrved Dy puDllc transic' If noc, vhac 1s the •ppro:isats dlstaoce to c!u
nnarest traoslt •cop'
/1l0 - S;1-2
c. ilov eany parking spu o• vould the complecsd pro}eet haraT 8ov aaaT vou1Q che pco}scc elideu cc•
3 v'~ sf'~'~e~- ,!~a ✓'/c ~ rr~ s sJa~ ~P s
d W111 the propoaal nquire ae7 osv roads or •trM t*. or layro"mnts to asisting rcsd• or stroat•
noc including drivevays2 If so. generally descriDe (lndi u te vhather publie or pTivate).
w ;c~&a I Ke'--
Aovw , -fo
~
e'i"e/ o~ ! ~
e. Hill the pro~t uae (o`f`occur in the I~diata ricinitp ot) rater, rail, or air traosportacioni
If so, generallq dascribe.
9
(kAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11.10.230(1) SPOICAFL EtiVIYON!ffiJiAI. OBDI1fMCE
. i ~
~ B. II9VIRORKERAL II.E?Mf'I'S ( contiaued )
Evaluation For
Agnnc7 Use Only
f. Aov nany aehleular ttips per day vould be generated by the caople[ed project4 If lmova. ~
ladieate vhea peak vould oceut.
/
2~6 7.::2 vTD .hra S~uw / 4!~;~
~ -
g. Pmposed oeasuns to reducn or control cransportation impae[s, if anl:
._..L~ • r~55 -~/'v---~ ~~~~~~~.~c~ - ,s.s ~v~~~ ~'rd ~
~ ~ /o r ~ G~~~' • ~~ir~ r~E~'i i(C
PC
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a 'dould the prnject tesult in an lncreascd nwd foc puDlic ssrvicas (for exaaple, tirt pro[ectlon,
pollce protection, health care, •choola, ocher)i If so, geneca117 desctlba.
/V U l- %YI GYt~S~ ✓I P, Prl I ' ~P. ~/~C ~ ~
S~~~rG~ ~`5 ~~p4,i~JG.~ •
D Proposed neaeures co ceduce or coacrol direet lapacts on public •erviu s, 1` iny•
iYvn-e
- ►
~
. (
16 lT'ILI'.'IES ~
a Ctrcle uclli curtenLly--+*jLL1&Q1s at Che •ice el~ctrlcit , tucal ga , v- te~tefuse ,
eervlce, elephone, ~Lury'iever) •epcic ~y~ceo, o ~
b Deeerlbe the utilitle• that ere proposed for the proJec[, the utilltr providlns the •ervite and
the general conscruction actlvltle• on the sit• or in the ln~dlaCe vielnity vRich dghc be !
needed ~
UL- / ~ • ~ 00 . ~
~i
C SICNATURE
i, the underslgned, svur uader the penALlty ot perjury thac the •bove respoores are tide truthtully and to the beac ot oy lcaw ledge. I also
underetand that, •lould chere be •oy villiul nierepreseetatloa or vlllful Lek of full disclosure on sy part, the a en m y vlthdrav any
Oetermirocion of nonsignlflcaace chat ic sight issus in reliaoee upon thl• c!» cklisc.
Da te v ✓ ~ ~ Proponent cY ~i~ ` ~ ~r
(P1eaab~Print or Type)
Proponenc ~~~__~\Y s• ~ ~ Address: Al
~ (Slgnature) .
Phone 411, -2 - -2~.~
Person completing foro• 1l%G~~~'C~ • Dace:
Pho ne
.
POR STAPY OSE ONLY U
~
Staff nember(s) revieving checkliot
Baaed o thio etaff reviev of the environnencal cheeklkyt a"ther pertiaaot iofor~cian, the staff.
A Concludes thec thnre are no proDable ilgnlfiunc edverse lapacts aod reeaeaendo a detecminacion of nonsigaificance
B Coacludes thac probable signiflcant adverse environnental lapacto do e=ist tor the curreot proposal and recon■eads e mitigated decer-
mioaclan of aotulgnlficance vith conditlocu _
C Concludes thac there are probable •ignifiunt •dvecse environmental iapacts and recoeaend• a detecmination of significaace.
TILIRG PS - $75.00
10
SPOKANE COUNTY. PLANNING
ZONE 17.ECLA.SSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART Z
r
A. CENERAL INF()$MA.TTnNt
NAME OF A.PPLICANT/REPRESENTAT7VE• Romax Associates C/O Dwight J. Hume
MAILING ADDRESS: N. 91 01 Mt. View Lane
CITY: S STATE: Wp_ ZIP. 9 9 21 8
PHONE: 4 6 7- 7$ 2 2 (work) (home)
ZF APPLTCANT IS NOT 0WNER, INCLUllE WRI'tTEN OWNER AUTHORI'LA'fION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE-
- 6o;241-077 7
M AILTNG ADDRES S • / 3
,
CITY: STATE• ZLP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 2- 7 4 acres ( 1. 1 acre rezone )
AD3ACENT qREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) 1.64 a c r e s ( w e s t)-
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 13.5-4-2 =1~12 2( Rezone ~ 3 3, I ZZ~
13 5-4-2 1219 2 0_,-2-1- ;2-4-& 2-5--y- j
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
~1...9_,_2_O-,-2-1-c 9 4-1
15524 E. Valley Way (Rezone) ~ •l ZZS -~Z~' !
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL i
EXISTING 7ANE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTAI3LISHED) UR 3.5 Jan. 91 ( 6 0- 4 2)
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY c',,~
PROPOSED ZONING B` 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley
FIRE DISTRICT Fn iii
WATER PURVEYOR Vera Water & Power
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings O Duplexes O Multifamily dwellings (
Manufactured homes Business ~K) IndustnaI Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVTOUS PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT ACI'TONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY.
None, This property crossed over to UR 3.5 as did the
adj acent B-2 property to the West.
B. I,ECJALIzONE RE~LASSIFIGATI()N ZNFORMATYC)N:
LOCATION OF PROFOSAL• S.E' C'nrner Va 1 1 Py Way & SL1 1 i van (250 'Egl5t )
SECTrON 13 TOWNSHIP 2 5 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS. Valley Way & Sullivan
WTDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD. 1-U ' Va-IJ Pv Way-LR P7 o nP )
311' on Sullivan & 380' Valley Way
.
ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION A.PPLICATZON Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN A.RTERIAI.OR PLA.NNED ARTERIAL (X) YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Sullivan & Valley Way
• LEGAL DESCRIPTYON OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
See Attached
EXISTING ZONE(S) UR 3.5 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ R_?
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAI~,'~D SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW.
See Attached
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN TT? _
Agent for the bwner
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED?
1) Rezone to B-2 27-89 Fred Meyers on S. Boundary
2) Street Widening Requirements for Valley Way and Sullivan
I-) ThP Exi st-i ng B-2 Sit.P bPr.ome•s too small with St. Widening
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROP4SED ZONE RECLASSLFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENI'T .
PROPERTIES?
1) The Adj. Property has a contractor's Yd. and Fred
Meyer's adjoins its South boundary.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATTQN)
Future Street Widening; Reclassification of Valley Way as
an arterial; and the Fred Meyers rezone along the south
side of these residences which front Valley Way.
WHAT MEASURES DC? YOU PROPOSE TO MIT]GATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE?
1} See Site Plan of Record;
2) Landscaping per Zoning Code, orientation away from
housing to the North and East.
i
^ r
f f
ZONE RECLASSLFICATZON APPLICATXON Page 4 0f 4
PART Izi
SUIZVEYOR VERIFICATION
1, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LZCENSED LAND SURYEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONING MAP AND WRITTEri LEGAL DESCRIP'I70N.
I
S IGI~IED.
ADDRESS' E'
~ PART Iv
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTX OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSFS ARE
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST 4F MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THF,
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTI4N, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, AT'I'ACHED HEREW ITH IS
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF
SIGNED Df'1TE
ADDRESS S PHONE• 5-Z75P- ~;2'e/- 3777
- '
S~'o.~~ r~ ~1/~ • 9 9'~ C~/ Z IP. ,t9' :2o if
d i
~I ` 77 ~ATURE C~ APPLTCA1 OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN TOjAFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON' THIS DAY OF
/11 ~ 11993,BY ~ /IG1» ~ S G
, - i
NOTARY SEAL
Notary Public m and for Lhc S•iLc oC Ws~ ngton .
Reslding al.
My appommcnl cxpires 11- o~ ~ ~ .
pART V
, (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPAI2TMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED• FTLE 4.. 7/e - 0(3
~
DATE ACCEPTED l1d 1 B Y
~l CD
TOTAL FEES: 9 ~ ~ a. RECEIPT~ :t4
'
.
_ - Romax'. _ As'soco
' -
'
u E 1'" - l
,rR
< - - sr/o
`
N•a506
0 J ~
To~, • IC ,~p,., p 13
Firc ~
14
z L
P 2,2-`' St-afiiOn
f) o9res5z
~ 5c h c~o ~ ~S o
t-jtCt~~'~
~ ~O Sc ~ C
~ D
co
. . . ; A LL.E ~A -
~
s l/1
cc ~ ~ ...~1 _ - Y ~ M a,`~;L~
+ ~
~
-1
R i y j v' J r~ .
i
.
~AL~ `M Sr P ~P
vE
r - 2Np
, r•
. • ~ ~ / B ~
- 3~ r~ i-~EL E Y-~ 1
~
-TM ~ 5 z ' rLAKE '
Tr ` ~ 'e~ntro~oll'eX
~ A OA Y '.Pl,q' ~ fi i e`d'd~~-; • : `
1
~G~-10 0. - ~ • . :.d~. 2'~ i
~ - 1 G !-V- >-t Av
~ ~ - ,c~ _ _ • ~
a 7 H""`'f
~ '9T : ; , ~GN~.'~
+ ` ~ ,o-rY~ • ' ~ a ~ ~
w
11T q
~ ~ "
w I a
June 9, 1993 @ 2:15 p.m.
Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Community
Business (B-2)
Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Sullivan Road
and Valley Way in the Southwest 1/4 of Secrion 13, Township 25 N.,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Major CommercialJtJrban within the Priority
Sewer Service Area (PSSA)
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
PROPOSED ZONING: Community Business (B-2).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification for a restaurant and retail
build.ing.
PARCEL NUMBER: 45133.1219, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1225, & 1224.
SIT'E SIZE: Approximately 2.74 acres. Rezone - 1.1 acres.
A►PPLIGANT: Charles Williams
% Romax Associates
S 613 Washington
Spokane, WA. 99204
(509) 624-3777
AGENT: Dwight Hume
N. 9101 Mt. View Lane
Spokane, WA. 99218
(509) 467-7822
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahl
, -
i .
.
.
i ' ,
S P O K A N E s, o C O U N T Y
PLANNING DEPAR'I'MENT NN*ALLIS D HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Deparcment
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recrearion Department
Ted Trepanier, Department of Transportation
Connie Brady, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Va11ey School District No. 356
Vera Water & Power
Fire District No. 1
FROM: Paul F. Jensen, Senior Planner
DATE: May 26, 1993
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Community
Business (B-2)
APPLICATInN ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING
TUNE 9. 1993 AT 2:15
.COI1NTY PLANNING HEARINC R nnM
Please review the above application and use the atta.ched APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representarive have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the
attached form to Stacy B jordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Planning Department file (so bri.ng thrgg copies to the meering). Thanks
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact
Stacy Bjordahl of the Planning Department at 456-2205.
c: Dwight Hume, N. 9101 Mt. View Lane, Spokane, WA. 99218
Charles M. Williams c% Romax Associates, S 613 Washington, 99204
Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Farm, Projecx I?esign, Site Plan
RECOVED
MAY 2 7 f".,l
~~eowffi
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVL-NUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509)456-2205
.
~
.y
?A1 ~ D ISC c~SS ~'t~lS d1v67 l~ c 7-f ( /`'1. e-.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
_ •
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
NAMEOFAPPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Romax Associates C/O Dwight J. Hume
MAII.ING ADDRESS: N. 91 01 Mt. View Lane
CTTY: g pok a n P: STATE: Wa _ ZTP: 99218
PHONE: 4 6 7- 78 2 2 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT O`PVNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN O'PVNER AUTHORTZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: CldarlkS i0- l~ ~,/~1~~15 PHONE: 6o-240`0 77 7
MAILING ADDRESS: /O C51, ~ j l c~~rJ~ ~f1~
CITY: ~ dle, STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOS AL S ITE ARE A(ac res or sq. ft) 2- 74 a c r e s ( 1. 1 a c r e r e z o n e)
ADJ ACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft.) 1.64 a c r e s ( we s t)
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 1 3 5 4 2-1 2 2 2 ( Re z one )
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED ~ 21,24 & 2 5
13542-1219,20,21,24,25
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 15524 E. Valley Way ( Rezone )
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3.5 Jan. 91 ( 6 0- 4 2)
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY c'~ ~~mlly-4n4L
PROPOSED ZONING B - 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley
FTRE DISTRICT Fn ~ ~
WATER PURVEYOR Vera Water & Power
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufacaxred homes Business Industrial Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVTOUS PLA.NNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
None, This property crossed over to UR 3.5 as did the
adjacent B-2 property to the West.
B. LECAL/ZONE SSIFICATInN INFnRMATION.1
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: RF C_nrnPr Va1 1 ey Wav & Sul1 ivan (250' East )
SECTION 13 TOWNSHIP 2 5 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Valley Way & Sullivan
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: V a 1 7 Py W am( R P 7 nM_ej
311' on Sullivan & 380' Valley Way
~ NE RECLASSrFICATION A.PPLICA'IZON Page 3 of 4
- PART 11
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WZLL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTNrENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HA.D PRELIMINARY C4NSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUB'MITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTNO. ~
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS 409VE') (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE N4W
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INQ.UDE:
s cf- Q 10 c a.c~-163
- FIRE DISTRTCT SIGNATURE/I'ITL DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FII2E FLOW
REQUIREMENTS jlft'PAW?~" (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS•
.
_,(e!~ GtJ~if7e72 ~ u/c~. ,~Q~r•f dO~earrr,+s zS~-9.3
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH T7c_ PLICANT.
A. C Olv9viENTS :
A//
1S I TTL DATE G
~ v
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION FiAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNA'1'ED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS
A. C OMNiENTS :
SIGNATUREITITLE DATE ,
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PL AL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE (HAVE NOT) EEN SATISFIED.
Q ~
A. COMMFNTS:
►
. l.
SIGNATURTLE ' DAt
J
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A : COMMENTS:
SIGNATURElTITLE DATE .
~ . ~ ►
~-st~"►"" ~ ' !
_ ' ~ • '.,M ~ ~a ( MR
- vM ' - 1
L'' uMS+O ~ ~ - ►
.
~ ~ , ~1
i ~ s: '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; t ~ • • ~ ,
~ ~ . ~ .
.'hw~~M M •
} • ~ N t~ i
~ ~~r ~ •
• N{ ~ +
4 'S ~ ~
. , ~ a ~ • ~ • . . ' • ~ ° i
- . , • ~ = l
j
. ~ ' ~ - , . t ti ~ ~ c t t 4 4 ►t k t k f 'i ~ -
~ ~;1~.;-;i ~ •
► s~
i- ~
~
~ . ~ • ~
t!.! _
, ~ *h,•? ;
Z ~ ~ t ; ~ • .
i ~
t ` ~ t _„i, s F e~•
1
3~ • ~
~
v 1 A
o
` T : ~ ~ • . . . . . -
`
000 ( M
~tY~ ~.i~ • • I1 ~ ~
/
~ , ` ~r ~Z
.
a~:+ o xi N~ v n~'+ n 5
N
~ PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT
Number.
Oate: 51xll-
Name 1
Phone
Address
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING ~
/
~
M, 4$
.ti.C r { ~?1"~4y{'~``1
e ' ^~5~~~ • ~
Q•~OGLOC ~~RF.Y~• STr`efl1, 1 n e {rv ~ ~ •
. . . . _ . u,; ~~~t~
: Addressing s Admin. Fxoeption ~ Approar.h Percnit
~ Building Permit ~ Arterial Rd Pfan InEo ~ Ftood P1ain Permit
; Code Information ~ Biuding Site P1an Info i PublicRrivate Roads
~ Cocnmercial Review ~ Cert. of Exemptioa ; Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
, Conferenoe s Comprehensive Plan ~ Site Drainage Info
; Energy Code Info ~ Coad. Use Permit : Subdivision Review
= Fre Safety Review . ~ Nonoonformiwg Usc t7ity Percnit
~ Manufactured Home s Permit Review ~ Zone Change Review
Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info
~ 4ther Permits ~ Short Plat Info N REQUIRED
-R 'e r Tune out
~ Pfumbing Percnits = Subdivision Info uo y ~
rf~,.y ~ ,ch.} ~n ~~o ti { ~ ~c' > r t>r>?tas 2` r~
: Private Road Info ; Temp. Use Pemnit
~ Residential Review ~ Varianoe Appl. , APA Payment ;
" rl
i'
~ Sewer Pecrnits ~ Zone Check ~ Cert. ofExemption Zone Info Subdivisian Rcview
~ ULID/Sewer Info
Zone Change Review
. s NO FEE REQUIRED ~ NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewer Tune out Reviewer Tune out Reviewer Tirue aut
MAS'iL'RIPASSPORI.CLK 1/16/'D3
RECE I PT SUMM7IRY
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9300814 DATE: 05/24/93
APPLICANT: HUME, DWIGHT J PHONE= 509 467 0112
ADDRESS: 9101 N MT VIEW LN
SPOKANE WA 99218
CONTACT NAME: DWIGHT HUME J PHONE= 509 467 0112
TRANSACTION: ZONING PERMIT & LAND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAL DUE = 220.00
TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
05/24/93 00004342 9358 220.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU
~ r ` ,
. ,
_--j--- -
r
. ~
■ . -
~ ' ' . ~ ` • ` ~ ~ ~'~-..f _ -
' - ~ ' • ' ' t~ , ; ~ ~ r ' ~ ' , ~ r` 1' ~.r. '
~ti~r~~~ • ~
• ~ ~ i
l F`~ ~
v E '--_____1 .r-- 90~., , .
~
.
2 { S
~ p s~0h
< iR1oG~.
a 50 6
;
a ~
'~f • ,
' St-caj"jOn
t 1 ~ rt5~ 3P~~r•l ~ o
W ~ n~C)4~ 4( • r(
c ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~1 ' ~ p„ i- l."
~ a.
.
r
.
d " p t
5 p R
9[5 _ - ~ ~-`.s't'"' r~-~' c ~ • 5 ~ f
~
~ r zN ~
- r. M r It. '-t
L E Y~
801 1 f
► 3 x rH
t
24
E , ~~;J;`,
~ :~~~Q ~ ~ ~.v ` ,U.• r
5 ~ , • • 1~ l..l.r
1[ 4, I • ~ ~ ~~TA'{ + i
{ ~
~...r
•
~
- -
.
;
4
C I I
t ~
~ i
r
9 „I,,.► ~
~
_ • ~ . ~
i
owq
MlAf Tr
`l ' r~~ ~iI t ~.r~~w ~ . ~
r +p,,.i♦ s tt1,N+M
44 ~ • p,M~ 4 I ~
~
~ ~r . 1 ' i w~~• .w~~ }
y ` V "t .M j ww
Y
~ ~ - ~ " ~ s ~ R fy, reo ~ , f""'r , ~ • , vti
. ' i
i .If~
d I a' ~p~~/~ ~ w i
I ~ 1 ~yY~ ~ • .
`I0000 ~ H va.. YM~
v p 3 . ~ ~ '~t~.•.~ p
I ~ • v ! s r ~ ~ ' , u.~, 4 5 ~ r,.~ . r
O , M x Y{//~~ s ~ . y IY•
M
E ~ ~ ~ " • ' _
~t + r) M M r• ~ ~ , ^ p 'M
• ~ I ~~r n ~ • ~
7w *~,~,*~~'~`r
'I
' J ~ ,,,n 1 ^ M ~y . % ~ 1 ~ V
I tMt' 1 ~ i~' ~ +t ~
`w+ j 1~~ r a tf
~ I ~ r
w
iT
i
P-IW
M I
if
~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ yo'w+` pL t • ~ ~ } . .-t « 1 , ~ .
~ ~ ~ • ~ ~.wr~'n . ~ ~ w.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • „ « ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ .
, f • « w' w' N.. v '
~
` . • ~ ~ '
i I ' ' ~c o rr
' ~ . I ~ ~ ~ ~ r'~~~ • y~p' ~ ~ ~ • T ` ~ /
N
SITE P~` - ~ .
.,.u
T t "
~ . ~ ~Y■ ] r..~l/'~.