The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-068-96 Cach:elec} I.~ITL j 1 NI!.I',lt 'S RE'V,H. WSHI'~ F.T Date Ftlrt! Date As Hwlc i'la>>; I:t:.:~a~ ~d Date RnW Plana Approveci REZONE FILE #ZE"068-96 Ncw Road Starnfanls 5-I S-9; hlvlar Cumpanion File Hearing Date: 04123 11997 H Time: U1:30 Ii Numtxr: 3 Related File DESIGN Review Dute: 12/26/1996 DR Time: 01:15 Building Depc Rcview Date: 02/12/1997 R'time: R Numbesr: DFASIGti REVIEW # DRZE-243-96 Date Received: 11/19/1996 Review 1'ypc: LaBe Lot ' Sldg. Square Faer. H°• Lots: No. Acres: 1.64 Project Name: UR-22 TO B-3 Rangc-Tuwnship-Sectian: 44-25-13 Site Address: N SPRAGC1E/E CONKLIN/W CARNTNE PARCE1.(S): (first 20) Applicant Name: DUSTER 1-IEITMAN Phone 467-2123 45134.1439 43134.1441 45134.14aa 451344.144 Phonc 2aa 451344.1442 Arplicant Address: 8205 N DMSION ST 5f'OKAh'E W 9920$ nAtc Canditio tlyd: ~ ? ~ Flood "Lone: No Water Sourcc: 4 Scwcr Suurce: Schoul Diu: 356 * Firr Dist: 1 Phone Dist: Billing Namc: Owner: BUS'1'L-K HEIT;VIA.N Enginecr: pATRICK J MOORE Addrecl: Ow«er Adclrc~~: ~205 N DNISION ST Company: [NLAND PACIFiC Eh'GINEERI SPOKANE W 99208 Address: 707 W 7TH AVE S't'E 200 SPOKANE WA 992(}4 P'hone: Owner Phoik: 467-21ZI Phone: (509) 458-6840 Fax: (509) 4584444 Signect Name Duilding # 456-2205 / Plaruiing # 456-3675 Cuntact: LOiJIS WEBSTER Date Submiitcd Description Tnitials ~ 12:201996 DATF TECHNICALLY COMPLETE nATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETE UATE PAY FEFS RECENED DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMYLE-TED AMD COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~ I I NOTICE TO PUBLIC 1 NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED in-0uc M! In-0ut +r2 in-0w A3 DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT In-Oun 04 Io-ouc #s In-th,, Ns BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRA[NAGE I'TEM CAL.CIJI.ATED DATE BOND RECEIVED I30NU AMOUIYT RECEIYED DATE BOND RELEASE - U:1TE BUND REDUCEU IiaND BALANCE Iiearuig Date Urc;ision Approved - Dcnicd Cantinucd Appealr,d BCC ARprovrtl Ucnird Appealed w Court Approved Dcnied Continur.d Finall Projrct Status STAMPED MYi.ARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL) . STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETA,RY (SANDY) I Ca~~led ENGIN~EWOP'REVIEW SHEET Date Filyd Date As Built Pluns Rccrivai Date Rnaci Plans Appmvod DR REZONE FILE #ZE-068-96 -96 PFew Roat1 Staniucds 5-15-95 Mytar Companion file Related Fite Hwring Date: 11 '1'imc: H Numbtr: DEStGN Review DAte: 12I26/1996 DR Timc: 01:15 Building DeQt Review T?ate: 02/ t 2/ 1997 R Time: R Number: DF..SIGN REYIEW # DRZE-243-96 Date Received: 11/19/1995 Review Type: lArgC Loi Bldg. Squarc Feer. Nu. Lots: No. Acres: 1.64 Projeet Name: UR-22 TO B-3 Range-Township-Section: 44-Z-13 Site Address: N SPRAGUElE GONKLIN/W CARNINE paRCF.t.(s): (first 20) Appl icant Namc:: BUSTER HETTMAN Phone # 467=' 123 4513a. t a34 d 5! i,1.s 1:an 45134.1444 45134.1441 Applicant Address: 8205 N DIYISION 5T phone 2#: 451344144' SPOKANE W 49208 Date Condidans Madcd: Flaxi Zcme: No Water SOurcc: Sc;wer Suurce:: Schtol Dist: 356 I=ire Dist- 1 Phone Dist: Billing Name: Owner: BUSTER HEI'IMAN Enginec:r: PATItICk ) MOORE Address: Owner Adclreas: 8205 N DMSiON ST Company: IN1-A`1D PACIFIC ENGINEERI SPQKANE W 99208 Address: 707 W 7R1 AVE STE ?UD SPOKANE WA 99204 Phone: Owner Phone: 467 -=I23 Phonc: (509) 458-hRAui Sigrxed Narrtc: Fax: (509) 458-fh944 Building A+ 456-2205 / Ptanning # 456-367 Contact: LUUIS WEB5TER Date Submitied Description Initials DATE TECHNICALI..Y COMPLETE DATE NO? TECHNICALLY COMPLF.TI: DATE PAY FEES RECEIVED DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY 'I'U ACC01,1N'l'Iti'(:; FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC /NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1', 4 COh1F'i_I~ I"i_[~ -~~K \I~EUti 'fO i3E SIGNf~U fn Out A'l in-Ouc #2 tn-ou1 03 ULSiGN DE\'IAT1c)N L):'1'1'E~.S IN-Ot'"1- Io-Out 14 In-0ut #S Io-Qu► a6 BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATL•n DATE HOND RECLIV[:U I30ND AN1C)t'N'T' RECFIVEU DA'I'E IiOIvL) RE;t..i~.ASi: - i)AT'i: i3UNll RFDi "CEU I3OND Bn[_AIvCE Hca[ing Datr. Dect-oun Appruvr.d DCIi1Cd Canucuiul Appcaled BCC :1pprcivc.l Dcisird Appealed w Court Approved Deniuf Contirnud Fin:tl Projcct Status STAMPED MYI..4RS TO PERMTT TECHNICLAN (SYL) I ! STAMPED 208 L4T PL.aNS TO SECRETARY fSANDY; i ~ ► ,F ~ ~ MEMORANDUM DATE: January 2, 1997 * TO: Pat Harper Aw CC: Ann Winkler, Iniand Pacific Engineering, Inc Mark Rohwer, WSDOT FROM: Steve Stair ~rr SUBJECT: Threshold Traffic Study for Heitman Rezone at SPOx~ftCo Conklin & Sprague I have reviewed the Threshold study for the Heitman rezone at the intersection of Sprague Ave and Conklin Rd. I have found that the results in this report appear to be complete and accurate. There is an error in Table 3 concerning the directional distribution for the proposed development. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the distribution should be 48% exiting and 52% entering for the AM peak hour and 57% entering and 43% exiting for the PM peak hour Since this project generates a relatively small number of trips, this error does not change the results and conclusions found in this report Therefore, I recommend we accept this study as complete and adopt the recommendations found in section IX, Proposed Mitigation. If you have any questions or comments regarding the review of this project, pleas feel free to bring them to my attention. . r ! SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER In the Matter Concerning ZE-68-96; A Zone Reclassification ) - from Urban Residential-2? (UR-22) to Regional Business ) NOTICE OF (B-3) zone ) PUBLIC HEARING RECEIVED ~ AP R 16 1991 Applicant: Buster Heitman ) TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of prop6sa1, a"s lQt1i`st~ on Spokane County Assessor's records. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARNG WILL BE HELD 0N THE ABOVE- REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW: Hearing Date: April 23, 1997 Time: 1:30 p m. Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works BuildinQ; 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) to Regional Business (13-3) for those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3). Applicant/Owner: Buster Heitman 8205 N. Division St. Spokane, WA. 99208 (509) 467-2123 Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, bet~.veen Conklin Road and Carnine Street in the SE '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N, Ranae 44 EWM; Spokane County; Washington. Zoning: Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) Comprehensive Plan: Major Commercial. Environmental Determination (SEPA): A Determination of NonsiQnificance has been issued. The Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency. The official comment period ends April 21; 1997. Related Permits Not Included in Application: None. Division of Building & Planning Staff Person: Louis Webster, AICP; Planner 11 509-456-3675 , Zt=6t-8,w96 ~ - . ~ . ~s ~ r~oti ~ 9 ` ~ • 1RIDGE j~ • gp 0 Nl4506 , . t . . O , ~ r 5 ROAO ::A1►' Av E. ~ 13 ~ - n " •Y Firc • n ~ogre's's= StatiOn ~ w St hoo 1 ~ ~ Q~ o :5.ect r'a ) • V A. L E r ..-r - . . . . . ~ ~ Mi►~ H Z• 1 ►4 AV ;E ' r Y ? J cc 5 PRACUE . IN , > ~ .:r.~~ • ~ ` . • . - , . ; Lr c. . tZ--6;'9 FLDA'r v s V ~ ~ vE 'aa LE ~q ~ ~ l .ST.P~P RR Ga. -s--+~""- 2 y c ~ e hi ~ _RO . C ~ ~ . " T v v Z ~.TN ~ W r ~ ul oo f 3 ►r► --~i ) 8 R' DC E v~ ~ 6 TM 2 E'1LEY rv• 4~0 9 6~ ~ ~ . nt::Loll'0X: , lLAK~ ~`h ~ i' ' ~ ~ ~ ~.•.,.~p .4Y~ ' ~ •~c. I GH'~' ~ AvE : : ~ ~ _ ~ • • ';,;13_ 24 ~ { • , ~ C:1/.~ 9 TN } . t 11 T}l AV 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 1 Vicinity Map ~ ~96 ~ 1 • ' ~ ~i . . ■ , y _ b . ~°i""' _ I~ ~ ~ - - • _ ~ _ , _ , ~ ~,,,~,o,..~L+~+"'.. . _ ~ ro ~ ~ , , . _ - • , " "~Sy 0 ~ , r; ~1 ~ ~ /1►~ . Q i . ~ ~ . _ . . ~pfiiOn e P 2 n ~ 0 qC~ . . % • 8.2, a ~ ~ ~ . 5 -2 • - ' ~ _1-- ' ' 40~ ~ , ~ . ~ M • 22 g-2 8~' ~ V, ' ' - ~L4 uA- , 5„3 ~ y ~ 1 ~ a w` R v ' 2 R $_2 N y~t ~ _2 ( G~M :1~- . UR.22 ct . v' vx 33 u.~ B~ z _ , t ~ t 09 ; . .R „►Ljt G: •1:.~ , r,ti z 6 pll e`~:• ~3~ , ~ . . ~ -~.~•ea . , ~ C ~ ; ' i:.'~:•';- , - p1~~ ~~w 00 • ~GN ` ~ - r:C~;'V: s ~ H + t0 ~ ~ ~ W • ` W~l, . .r►~ _-'a-"-r • oe 2 a ` ow E ~g_9b far Z 3 -91 x~ Staf ~ Rep 4- Map f7^n iT1gl ZEm68=96 ~ ' ~ . • • ~ y~ ~y - ~ u •a • ~ ° ' • ~ 14 •~~'~"P I k = , ° • ~ • • ' . .rT~t ` • o , o .~1 . ' ~ ~ • . r ' *MISS19w 1, : - • ` - .ii.~~.~~ ` T~!r ~ • ~~C:r'~. : ~t-~ • : lj~j ~ • _ •a~ . - . •e A, • 'II~ e. - r ' te... : - 'a - ~ ~7;:~- • Greenacres • % ~ \ ~ ~ . L- _ • • , ♦ ` ~~J, , . 1 • ~ I 1~ • ~'~~i ' _ ' rrr"►a.L,~Y • ~ • 117J1~• ~p' ~ . ~ ' ♦ - ; ~O • ' M• ••_j• 't4 i030 ~ • ` ~ • _ _ ~ ' a ~ . v~ ~ " , . - • • < - j • • 20521 6 j .~-..az~ ~ :i ~ ( ~'•=~~-~i~-'-•: . a-rraaa r•tv~'~~~; ~ , ~ . . o . . . • ~.•"'~r.Z ? • a 14[ . ; ° • ' • . ~ _ , , ° : o o , o : : ~ o ~ _ • ~ _ r.~ - Y.:: ' S ~ ^ • : ' 7 i ~ " ~ ~1 1~~ • • M~ ~ • ~ • • p ~ • @ ~ + ~ ~ ~ • a ~ ~ t. r~ 1~ • . ~Il• ~ ♦ ~ 1 o ~ C. 4 i , 1'~~~.i . ~ • ( . • • • ...•..••i.l_ . • ~ ' / ~ : :'~c: 'rs-s.y_... • y ~ 14 ' - , • /f1 ' ~ ~1.,"" ~ • i •i~ • • • :WAY • • : • ' - , ' ok ~.~L[tX • ~ ~o~ ~ ° ~ ~ _ cL • • •g~ ° c • Jf HtQil • • 4. ~ • M • • ~ . . ~ • q• • A t . . • • ~r7 _ ` - ` I ` • . • ~ !r~ ~J ~ . . a . ~ •~i' •~r ti U ^ ' ~ ~C .J ~l • • ♦ • • p . r • • ♦ et~er ~ ~ • • iO3 e • j ~ ~ • `'1Q2O~~ 6LANf USPRAG^UE~ -~~c'~~' ~ • • LA~vs=:,~•~ ~ ~ _r., --,','_c ~ . • '~.•~i• ' ..~i. ~ • ~ 1'~~~• ~ Y• ~ ~ ~ ~J~ • • ~0` 41 • i • 1 ~ ~ •f~• ~ ~ V • . Q i...•. • • ~ ■ o 01 00 Q o s ~ o ' ~ a~ • . • T PAUL'' ~ ° r~ • PACIFI ^ • ~ Vi~pm• • ~ J y~~ , ~ S ' ~ • 1 vf a s~ ~alYs ~ ~ ' . . ~ 1~ • GraYe1 Pit.s = V _ - Se~ Trsjler . ~ lOS~ . . ~ ~e • ~ ~ • •.~+w~ ~ ♦TM AVE..JT'+'°~~ O • ~ • r/"~ ' ~'~~Park ~ • • . ~ ~ ~ : • • r+~ ~ • i i ~ ~ ~ . • • : • ~ o • . ° ~ ~ 1 ~t ° ~ • . ~ - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e • • ~ • • Q • ~ ~ - f a. 1 ' - • ~`~6t~ I ~t~w~• ~ •Qrd~ O ~ = • _ • • • . Q. i,.......~, ~ „d=: .1 2~020 ~ ~_9~w ♦ 19 • : ,,,,E .IL .~i •Y1 _11~. 24 ~ ~.~•JL~~ .TLt1A~ 1 ~ • i ~ 1 ~ CQ~{f ~Sew e 0~1DOSJ1 ~ lgb-Sch V. li •~~....J ~ 9~ ^ 1 4 . y ~ ~ s ` :~j: . ~23~ ~ ~ aY,~-~w •~i . ~ • • ` ~ ' ~ •e C , - ~ ~ • ~ o• ~ .~r.~ . ••.1.•.•. ~ 4 w 5 • • • ~ r• •~.~G r~l._1~• K1J-1~l~~ A JOB6 . . . • ] ~ • • • _r,~~• \ i • N' • • . : • • . U aO O S O Q••, • 7. O 1(~ Or 1~._~~T:~: a • . ' ~ • ~ • ' g r~o ' ~t~; 1 • ~ . ~ ~ n. . ;~y:; • - d P• .Y ~ . a , . n~' . . . _ - r6rH 'D~..~~IOga o ..a . . wv.(~ 'j. .y.,~'" ' ~ " . ~ ~ r•. . . . . . . . . . ~.V ~ oIl ~ • A• . l i~ ` ~ . ~7 . . ~ i~. • . • . .l•.','. aa • ~ y~• . ~ • • •I • . _ . . -a ~ °_•T w~: ~°I ~y . . J ~1J ~'l ~ 3 ~ a ~ a a a s a i • .t~• • . : . : . P ° , . , "o' y . r o , ~f:;:;:~.•••:•.•: ; • _ Oaj~ ~ ''1:• . . . , ~ ' a~ • j ~ . , • . : . ' ° • o . ° : , • • . ~ ;late~'.. ~ i'.°.'' ~ . . . . . ~ a :~..-~TS~- : ~ . . . • . . . . . . . . 'j' •J. . . . . . . - i• ~ . . . • ` ' ~ • ' ~LVeti U... ?orx i ".~.i . ~,~avF ~ : . . . ~26 w • a i • ~ ~ ♦ t~ ~ . .'ti~ . . . . . ~ . . , ' ° ~ ' • ' ~.~i•?18?•.•.•.•:•.•:•:~:•'•'~'• • • • ~ :ti;l~j0:. o ~ ' • ~ F ~ • ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~~r • . . . .1.'~•~•~'.'. . •~~r'~• i .y . ~ ~ : • . . . '•.•:~'•r:•:,. , : ~ _ ~I t .'.J • • ~ , . . . . . h..~ ~ ..~.~.•.~.•..'''.~.•'•.'.•'~.i~.' ~ ~ ' • `\J .'7. . . . ~ .~1:....'.'.•~..::•..••:. / ~ ~ ~ ~ r • • ~ • • . • . : Y.•~ . . • . • , ~4 ` ~ '8N ` . . ' . . . ~,ti •"~'~:•:~r•: . . .tL T • ° a ' GH 2Q57 - _ _ . : - ° /d. ~ . ~ - ~ _ / \ 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 3 Comprehensive Plan Map ~ ZE=68'='96 _ YY~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ - • • ~ 2020 . H~ N~`_ • ~ N. ~ 1~---- - •~.r~ - - - ~ Y'~~~:!' • . , ~ ~ 1 ~ T , • . _ ~ • 1 = • F _ _ . r • a o ~ ~c ~ / ? ~ ~ • . . S ~.Greenacres ~ . ~ ' • ~tet} - - • . . 20i~dw_~;:= , o , r ~ . - . . . Y. ~b ~ . . - ~ ~ ~:•~~r:. ~1-0~ ~ '?ojo . WA*43 i G~ t, n . a~•~' 18 ~ 4 ~ ~ ...+r~~! s , .v ~~.~►e~..:s-e-.,..,.~ , _ •ir!... : r~ n •1 • u~ u ~ : _ , ~ ~ {{'i I~ resi~ ;~I~ . ~ r • 3 = ~ i G fi 1 • ~l• ~ ° L.' • • ~ • y . . ~ II• ~ . .o Q, ~ . .Y; ~ ~ , . ms~ me a~~~ Collector Arterial ' . • - , Y • • y • ~ • -s~ • VALLEY ~ ~ 1 ~w~~ . o ~~I ^ ~ y e ~ ~ ~ • Jr r ~ istt, : 7 ..a: • ♦ • • ~ ~t~ O ~ JC11 ~ • q ' ~ I ~ • • 1~ • ~T1':• j 1 ~ S .f ~ ~ ~ • vu ~ _ • 1 S rial N i~):n J ~«N' ; PRAQUEli~',~~'~~ '.I Veradale p~-~ncipal Arte i"' - - . ( . ~ . w . •.I ~ ~ [ . . ~ ' f.~~..1+i tl,i^~..I., • ~ ~ nn Ii~ ~ ~ ~~J ~ A~ ~Q O ~ f ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ • ~ • :1 l ~ f~ C (~T LQ{~/ -yt1J~ ~ ~ V / • ~ ' ~ V • ~ • ~ ItL^.~.^_ • ' ~ ~ • ~ • , ~ n 5l MIIfyO y ~ . (~~~yf•r ' Gravel_Pity. _ ~ , - r ~ • . • ~ ` • ' tich o • .nr.. • ' ~ -ler' . ~ w ~ riiii• ~ ?O/4 Park ~ZOS~ a 9f 61+ent.$3 o ►o8•qp -Fcr'• • oE, • • ~ , _ ~ ~ , _ - .206 < < : a oh ct8~~... • ~ • • ' . ~~:,_~.Ti~'r- Q , ~ r> j • ~ ! a - ~ tGb► Adam-i . I()zO . Sss;bA,;tes~. scn o . . / -p ( u ~ 19 . ~ a • • air" Centtal Valluy 24 l •t ~ . . • HiRh Sch V ; ~ ~Sewa e Oisposal s \ ~:.:i4. ~ ~ u2~] .7o . : u _ n - ~ . d • ~ • • ~ , , • ; I ~ , p• ~ 0 ,~I~ / . ;L• .~I . . • . ,I.... A ~6 . . . . , . : ~ • • • ~ " ° • " ! ' ; o .ti a pit' ,V~ • ; r - • • F:varurocn fl; u O. ; ~ h~jll ~ " ~ , r • ' ~ ° lJ~ ' IJ00 ~ J r Il :1 • . . . . , . \ ' ' • ' yY r ~ . ~ • e : : . . M j/ ~ ' ' ~ .P n k • ti asl . . , . , . . ' ~ ~ , ~ 3 • ' " _ . „ ; pd ~ . " `k ~ , ' • O ~ ' • r ~ f ~ ~I ' ' i, ~ . O •y ~ ' ' / 'ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 1 kl~• ~~,yq . , i 1 ~ ~ n ' ~f ' .:c1:-- - - ° b ` c :j ' _ • ' - oo~ Q~ ~ a 0. . - I i , ~ ~ • . ° 0 - ~:j r ~ . ~J • . , "a •I Water ~ ~ 24th Wetl~t 24TH ' ~:AVE . . 1061 "'6~ ' :r • ~ ~5 t~~l r-~, ~ ~ I ~r . . ~ • ~ D , ~ ~ ~ . - . r ~ , t • J u . e 1 i~ j • ° , f ;.t1nBl 2300 ~ , 1t • • q ~ ° , , . , • ~ ~ , - - . - ~ , ~i ; ! I , ~ _ , , . , • t•. A~ a . : ~ vf~ q~ ~•~'7 ti: ~ ' - . - - ~ ~ n ~i ^ j • ~ • ~ O : ~ , ' 1''~ u~ ~ 1 ' o ~ t r~` 6 • r 'vGlrar 57 M x4En , ~-,Ha , • • ; ,~i n - . , 7g3 ,aL° a . . p 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 4 Arterial Road Plan Map ~ ~ . ~ r• ~ rt a (D i ~ b J ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ti LOiS 7 iHOUCH 10 AND LOT 12, BLOCK 1 OF REPLAT Of BIOCK 13 OF 4ERA AS PER PLAT RECOROEO IN VCIUUE X Of PLATS, PACE 27 n * SPONSER u ~ BUSTER HEITAIAN fi CONKUN DEV£LOPUENT SITE D A TA N 8205 DIVISION ~ $POKANE, WA 99208 D (504) 467-2123 EXISIINC ZONE UR-22 7 PROPOSED ZONE B-3 ) i t ~ 1AqNIN uAP i Ti ~ 4-- --i---------~-- ~ ~ ~ I I ~ i ------i---------a--------~----------~ )o ~ ~ I I ~ L-------- RIVERSIDE AVE T--------T- ~Q T------- ;----------r--------~ p~O i 1 I ~ A.i rj i • i i i i + i i °~I 5 i 5 4S1 ►^7 4 i 3 ~"l z I il OLi L p r U~ C~ I I 143 24' 105.00' 10500' 105.00' 105.00' • ~ I I I U L 5' IuWDS~APE EASEI~IENE ~ ( Q.~• I CMPNIC $G1~F I EAcluEH lYPICa1 i I ~ Tw c~t eo q eo t ~ J J ~ 12 I ~ ~p 7 ~ g ~ 9 ~ 10 ~ ~3s' es I ~ cNFEEr~ i ~ LEtiSURED iR01I FM ~ i 1 Ywh - SO R I ( ~ 35' B 5 - S' LA►tOSGPE ( ~ ~ uEASURED fR011 FAA EASEAIFNT ~ - - - - - - - - - - !wicAL r---; --~---~~r---• •---T~-},---T~----~_______.1,r- L ' ~.i ~ Ip' N1UAE IC FUIURE ~ ACOU19T10N ACQO9ilON AREA ~fIEA SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ~ d - - - - , - EIVED - - ZONE RECLASSIF'ICATION ~ ~ oF SPOKANE COUN1TY LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOT 12 , BLOCK 1 ° I►+LAW ~ OF REPLAT OF BLOCK 13 OF VERA n 8 EA ,IAIV 1 O 1497 LOCATED IN THE SOUfiHEAST 1/4 OF 4 707 Mwl JtA - SJ(, NO 4M-U40 SECTION 13, T.25 N,, R.44 E., W.M. Spc'°^s, 9920' `AX3 '509, 45&-6844 AV SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON q no%11qjnri r~ pini rnnin nNin Pi n~~~~IWr • - 1 DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING REP4RT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: APRIL 23, 1997 SUBJECT: ZE-68-96; ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-22 (UR-22) TO REGIONAL BUSINESS (B-3) 1. GENERAL IiYFORiyIATION Applicant/Owner: Buster Heitman, Conklin Development 8205 N. Division Street Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 467-2123 Contact Planner: Louis Webster, AICP Associate Planner Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, west of Carnine Street and east of Conklin Road, in the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone. II. SITE INFORiyIATION A. Site Size: Approximately 1.64 acres B. Comprehensive Plan 1. The Comprehensive Plan category of the subj ect property is Maj or Commercial. The subject property is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The Major Commercial (C) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses, directly related to major throughways. Regional Business (B-3) zoning is intended to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone to Regional Business (B-3) implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan. 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 6 r - 2. Arterial Road Plan: The subject property is located on Sprague Avenue which is identified on the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a Principal Arterial with a future right of way width of 130 feet. The Spokane County Division of Engineering has requested that ten (10) feet of additional right of way be set aside as a fiiture acquisition area or (FAA). 3. County Parks Plan: Sullivan Park is located about a mile north of the subject property and is the closest county park. C. Site Characteristics: The site is level, vacant and undeveloped and consists of five lots along Sprague Avenue. A sixth lot seperates one part of the subject property from the balance of the subject property. This siYth lot is not a part of the subject property and is developed with a commercial building D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The neighborhood associated with the subject property is characterized by Sprague Avenue and the existing businesses along Sprague Avenue. E. Zoning Analysis: The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive business zone in Spokane County. The nearest existing Regional Business (B-3) zone is adjacent to the subject property to the west. There is additional existing B-3 zoning directly south across Sprague Avenue. The property east of the subject property was the subject of a public hearing for zone reclassification request last year but that issue has not been resolved. (file # ZE- 29-96) The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is consistent with existing zoning and land use trends in the vicinity. Proposal: Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) established in 1991, previously established as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) in 1955 (436- 55). North: Community Business (B-2) established in 1991, previously established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42). South: Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991, previously established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42) and Commercial (C) in 1979 and 1967 (72-79C and 37-67C). . East: Community Business (B-2) established in 1991, previously established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42). West: Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991, previously established as Commercial (C) in 1980 (47-80C). F. Land Use Analysis: The subject property is located on Sprague Avenue and the proposed zoning is consistent with land use and development trends along Sprague Avenue. The existing residences to the north are zoned Community Business (B-2) and are subject to disruption by development on the subject property but they are separated from the subject property by existing fences and landscaping/screening. No statement by the applicant as to what the proposed land use may be is contained in the file. Section 14.806.040 (2) of the Spokane 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 7 • County Zoning Code requires five (5) feet of Type III landscaping between the subject property and Sprague Avenue. Site: Vacant and undeveloped. North: Single family residences. South: Vacant, commercial. East: Vacant and undeveloped. West: Commercial. G. Site Plan: No site plan has been submitted for this proposal. Development standards of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone are summarized below. BuildinQ Setbacks Required Front yard (Sprague Avenue) 65 / 35 feet Flanking yard (Conklin Road) 65 / 35 feet Flank.ing yard (Carnine Street) 65 / 35 feet Rear yard (north) 15 feet Side yard (between lots) 0 feet Parlcing Subject to specific use per Section 14.802 Maximum Structure Height: 65 feet per Section 14.628.335 H. Circulation: The Spokane County Engineer and Fire District #1 will need to approve any proposed access and internal circulation prior to the issuance of building permrts. A Threshold Traffic Study dated November 6, 1996 was performed for the proposed zone reclassification. The conclusion of the study was that development of the site will not impact the intersections of Sprague and Conklin or Sprague and Sullivan before the year 2006. 1. Drainage: A drainage plan will be reauired prior to the issuance of any building permits. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to building permits being issued. J. Potiver Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: None lcnown. K. Water Supply: The proposal is served by the Vera Water District. Provisions for water service are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. L. Setivage Disposal. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. Plans and specifications will be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 8 , , . M. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District. No comment has been received N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. See letter dated December 16, 1996. 0. Cultural Resources: None have been identified. P. Parks and Recreation: No comments have been received. Q. Wettands: No wetlands are shown on the Spokane County Wetlands Inventory Maps. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the Division of Building and Planning. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Division of Building and Planning has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 10 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the fuhire development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends April 23, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Heanng Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. IV. DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING SUMVIARY & RECOMMENDATI0N The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the existing land uses and zoning trends in the neighborhood. The Division of Building and Planning recommends approval, as conditioned. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 9 ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property: Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12, Block 1, of Subdivision of Bloclc 13, of Vera. SPOKANE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended. 2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations when approved by the Division Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in p1rt, by the Spokane County Division of Building Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Ofticial on [ J, imposing a variety of speciat development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. 4 Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond, or other suitable guarantee, for the project pnor to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 6 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 7. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems; building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classificltion, exiting, exterior 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 10 wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) Attached are comments and recommended conditions of approval from interested agencies: Spol:ane County Air Pollution Control Authority; dated Apri12, 1997 Spokane County Division of Utilities; dated April 3, 1997 Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; dated April 7, 1997 Spokane County Health District; dated Apri12, 1997 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 11 5094596828 SCAPCA 699 P03 APR 02 '9? 15:22 ~ , - SPOKANE COUPJTY AIR POllU110N ~ ~~.Gtiil'~c ~Rn p b P O W. A IV IS CONTROl AU1HORfTY WEST 1101 COLLEGE, jUITE41 • SPJ>qANE, WA 99201 .6 (509) 456-4727 Fax (509) 459-6628 Date: , To: 0 Mr. Jeff Forn1 C] Mr. John Peclerson Spokane County Division of Buildings & Planning 10261N. Bro;adway Ave. Spokane, V11j4 99260 From: Mr. Charles E. Studer Re: SCAPCA REQUJiREMENTS FOR: File No& e~; 5 ~ (t° , ProponenUProject Name:'-- ❑ lReauest for Camments on 1 ❑O'omments on tiearinqs Examiner Public Meetinq on ~ (Comments on t)etermination of Nonsiqnificance Issued on ore-AciolicatioriMevelopment Conference on ~ The Spokane County Ait PoUution Control iluthonfy (SCAPCA) wes forrrted under tha eutltority o1 the 1967 Clesn Air Act of Washingfon (RCt~. Thet Act required count,es, 11ke Spokane County, to actrvate loca/ eir pollubcn carltrol agenciea To meet the requirements of ihaf Act. SCAPCA edopled regulafions fo ccinlrot the emrssions o1 eri contaminents from sources within Spokane County. Portions of Spokane Ccunty ferJ lo meet t'sderal health standerds tor perticu/ete emrssions (dust end smoke) end car6on mortoxide. Numerous slretegies have been implemerited to reduca eir pnllution emissions so th8t we cen improve eii quality end meet heallh ' stendards Following is a 11sf of concems/~,ssues thet, gt a minlmum, n@ed to be addressed for propased prqfecis, Addtional commants mey resvlf efter more detailed informaUon of the project is supplied. SCAPCA encowages propoRents fo conlact the;i offlces et 1101 West College, Spokene, WA 99201 foi edditionel lnformeiion. The following condiiions are relevant to proposed project. • Harvesting of timber creates siitiricuttural debris. This debris must be removed by methads other than buming to the greatest extent possible+. If buming is the only desited disposal method then it must be done in accordance wiih all applicablc- regulations, and conducted in a manner that minimizes smoke related nufsances and sir pollution impvlcts. • SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V requires that a Notice o( Construction and Application for Approvaf be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the construciion, installation or establishment of an air pollution source. It is possibte that the following air polfution sources may be pt'esent at ihe proposed facility: D One ot more fossi I fuel (naturat gas, propane, butane, diesel, fuel oil, or wasie oil) or wood burning heat sources. Natural gaslpropane/butane burning boilers, heating units, or hot water heaters with a total heat input of 2,000,000 Btuslhr are required to • apply fot a Notice of Construction. Othet unlts are required to apply for a NOC when the total heat inpui exceeds 400,000 Btus/hr. In addition, additional requirements such S.'~Ca+nnentsUZEv►SED GENE.=iAl COwMHNTS Qoc ~ ) O~nred o~ Foeyded vaper 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 12 ' 5094596828 SCAPCA 699 P04 RPR 02 '97 15:23 as Low NOx burnen: and source testing may be required depending upon the size of the unit. 0 One or more Stand by Generators. SCAPCA requires a Notice of Construction for all Stand by Generatom thai are rated greater than or equal to 500 mechanical horsepower (375 Kilowatts). • There are numerous businesses that are al(owed in a commerciai and industrial zoning that are air poltutton sources. Before any Iousiness is established at the site, SCAPCA should be contacted to determine if a Notice of Constrijction is required. A COPY OF THIs LETTER SHOULD BE GIVEN TO EACN NEW TENANT. • All air pailution regu(ations must be met. • Air pollution regulations require tliat dust emissions during demolition, construdlon and excavation proJects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, sprinkJers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads ahou(d be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be . controlled as well as emissions from all other construction reiated activities. • SCAPCA strongly recommends that alt iraveled surfaces (i.e. ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) should be paved and kept claan 1o minimize emfssions. • Measures must be taken to avoiii the deposition of diri and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on pave,d surfaces, measures must be taken immediately io clean these surfaces. • SCAPCA Regulation t, Acticle IV may require registration with this agency depending upon the type of business that may be established at ihe site. An approved Notice of Construction suffices to meet this requirsrnent. • SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI, and SCAPCA Regulation lf, Article 1V, address alr pvllution emission standards. All emission standariis must be met. • Debris generated as a result of this projeci must be d(sposed ot by means other than buming (i.e. consiruction waste, vegetative wasie etc.). • Demoiition and renovatlon proji:cis must comply with ihe requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M and SCAPCA Regufation I, Art)c!e tX. {ntent to Demolish forms are availab)e at the SCAPCA office. • Depending upon the tyRe of bw;iness or equipment establlshed on site, some objectionable odors may result from lhis project. SCAPCA's regul8tions siaie that effeciive control apparatus and measures musi be used to reduce odors ta a minimum. • All solld fuel buming devices (lJreplaces wood stoves, pellet sioves, etc...) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. JFireplace emfssion standards go into effect Janusry 1, 1997. New fireplaces must be tested and Isbeied in aixordance with procedures and criteria specif,ed in the UBC Standard 31-2. • If the proponent or anyone e1sei has quesiions conceming the above, please contaet Charies E. Studer (509) 458-4727 ext. 107, April Miller e:xt. 105, or Kelle Vigeland ext. 106 at SCAPCA's office during the hours of 8:00 am 8 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday. Failure to meet SCAPCA re!aulailons may result in delays, c/osure and clvil and/or crlminal sanctions. -CLEAN A1R IS UP TO ALL OF US PAGE2 irl-7 rir. c-.. _ rc 17 r. L O G ~ ► ~ To: LOUIS WEBSTER, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner From: Spokane County Utilities Date: 4/3/97 Subject Conditions of Approva! Planning Action Number: ZE-0068-96 Type of Action: ZR ZONE CHANGE UR-22 TO B-3 Applicant: BUSTER HEITMAN Legal Owner: BUSTER HEITMAN 8205 N DIVISION 8205 N DIVISION SPOKANE WA 99208 SPOKANE WA 99208 Sewer Service: SS04 The Dedication shall state/ A Covenant Agreement shall be signed stating The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which includes the Owner(s) property PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36 94 SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection permit is required SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval SS12F The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit. SS13A Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of the public sewer connections and facilities Water Service: VERA WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended 4-23-97 HE Staff -Report for ZE-68-96 Page 14 , . . OEFICE OE THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Eax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" DR-ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: Aprll 7, 1997 PROJECT: UR-22 TO B-3 FILE ZE-068-96 / (DRZE-243-96) Hearing/Review Date: 04/23/1997 @1:30 #3 Sponsor/Applicant: BUSTER HEITMAN Section Township Range: 13-25-44 Planner : LOUIS TrJEBSTER Design/Review Date: (12/26/1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referznced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing -o participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 5. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Enginezr, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. CC Appl! cant BUSTER HEITMAN Ezqineer/Surveyar PaTRICK MOOP.E 4-23-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-68-96 Page 15 ' Page 2 ► 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/26/1996 DRZE-293-96 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 8. The County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Conklin Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10-12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the develoament. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 9. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State or Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Access to Carnine Street shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 12. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 13. Al1 required construct?on within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost . of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 14. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Publ?c Number 6" which specifies the following: /._')q_a7 uP CztaFf RAnnrt for ZE-68-96 Page 16 Page 3 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/20/1996 DP.ZE-293-96 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the iormation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation oi the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) sha11 retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increGsed true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Tmprovement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of thz owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 15. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 in width along the Sp-rague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvemznts are made to Sprague P.venue. i. 1) 0 n-7 r,c c....cc n- 6- c..,.. 7L_r-Q_Qa 'pan o 1 7 Page 4 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/26/1996 DP2E-243-96 16. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 18. The applicant shall have a consulting traffic engineer submit a letter ~ indicating that approval of this proposal will not affect any of the previously analyzed intersections. 19. The applicant has previously submitted a traffic analysis for the intersections affected by this proposal. Based upon information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by the applicant at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates a plat Gpproved south of Sprague Avenue also has the responsibility to construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in the study warrants are now being met a-L this intersection zf any new final plats are done for this plat it would be the developers responsibility to construct the signa?. Should the applicant move ahead to seek a bu?lding permit for this commercial rezone adequate surety shall be provided to insure the construction of the signalization. 7'] (1 '7 S. JKANE hEGIONAL HEALTH DISTi-.;T ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Inter-office Communication DATE: April 2, 1997 TO- Louis Webster, A.I.C.P., Planner II, Spokane County Buildincr and Planning Division , ~EVE J FROM. Donald T L nch EHS II - EHD SRHD cp ~ y J , ~~aN~ couNTY ~ SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Zone Change: ZE-68-96 (Heitman) : : ~ : DfVISION OF 6UllEDING AtiD FlA14N1NG 1. References: SY; a) ylap of subject, scale 1" = 50', by Applicant, undated, received by this office March 31, 1997. b) Reconnaissance Geoloc-ric Map of the West Half of the Spokane QuadranEle. Washineton and Idaho. Allan B. Griggs, 1966. c) Soil Survev. Sookane Countv. Washinaton. Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A, March, 1963. d) SDOkane Countv. Washinaton. EnQineering InterDretations. Soil Conservation Service, U.S D A., Aucyust, 1974. e) SDokane Countv Rules and Reeulations for Sewa2e Disposal Svstems. January 19, 1995. fl Logs of water wells in RanQe 44, 45E, Township 25N, Sections 12, 13, 14, 18, and 24. g) Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Findings: a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer. b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service flrea #3 and within the service area of Vera W'ater and Power. Water supply will be a public system. c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not of the proper dimensions to permit the use of both individual wells and sewage systems. d) The project lies in a relatively flat area east of Conklin Road and north of Sprague Avenue Local drainageways are insignificant 4-23-97 HE Staff Renort for ZE-68-95 PaQe 19 e) Surface soils are clas3..d by the U.S. Soil Conservation Ser. __e as Garrison very stony loam and Ganison gravelly loam with 0% to 30% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight to severe. There is also possible contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV. fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are from 40' to 457' deep and have static water levels varying from 42' to 120' below the surface. The Vera Water and Power has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent. 3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved: a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval: a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. c Director of Utilities, Spokane County c: Sponsor. BUSTER HEITv1AN 8205 N DIVISION SPOKANE WA 99208 landuse itr1ze63-96(heitman)Qa i nI► n~ TTr. r ~ _ r r . . ~`~i ~ . . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 -1T RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY qIVi91QN OF BUILDIN4 APlD PLANNING t3Y; ~ 5?OKANE 5P#VIRQraMEHTALJQRnIRA►[CE, ` (1iAC 197-11-9681 5eciian 11.10.230(1) Enviraraoefital Checkttst F I }e !{q, Purpase af Ghttlcllst; 1'he 5tate Enxiramwnial Pdl+cy Act (SEpA) Chspter 43.21C RCu, requires all goverrrm-ntal 8g$R[1¢; to consider the environrnensal 1mPdetS af e Pro9oShc befare naking rtecislons. An Enwironrmntal Impact Statement iET51 mvst be prepared far a11 prpqasais x9Ch probable s~gniftitant adverse Impacts or+ th# pu.sTlty of the enrlrQrrernt. Thr purpose of this Checlc]ist 15 ta prpvide infqrraation Cp help you and the ag~ncy identify 9rnpa[t3 Frorn your 7r'op03a 1 fa+td Lo reduGe or arrflid Snqacts fram Che gro-posal, if it can he do-nrl and to help #he agenCy deCide ++RethBr an EI5 15 re4utred, initructions fdr AppliCents. TFsfs enrirnnaental checkllst askb you tC 443CriDs sOme basi[ informaiion a4out pour propcsal. Gaverr,aoental ageneies use this cnackiist xq deLer-mine +rhether the environmenCa1 impacts af yaur praDpsal arr signtflCant, requiring prepaYdtlqn of an E15. Answer the questians qriefiy, ,+tth the moSt prtc+st lnfornetian knarn, or gire khe hest descriptinn you can. YOu r.cisC ans+wer ea[h quest#an aCCUrAtel} and Carefully, ta the besC pf yovr knoxlsdge ln mast tasrs, you SIIoU~~ bo! able t5 answer tne ❑uesttions frae your vwn ohset'►xaC14n5 ar prajrct plsr+s +riCnou[ xrie nrrd to tiire exve€ts. If you reallp do not knox the arrawer, ar If # q4t88[iOn daes not al)alY Cq YOuY pPdpv5al. YF1tE 'd8 1185 kT14V' GP 'dOCS noC apply ' CCmDlELC aR$►1lYS [0 Lh! Ql!*S['f¢nt A47r fr!y dYOid Yn11lCe558Ty delays ldier 5ane quPSiians a3k ab4ut goyarnaental reqgulttions, such as zenfrtgF sharellne. and landmark designati4ns. Ansy+er these pul3tians 3{ yrne can If you hawe arehlerns, the laverrrmenKal agenc+es tan assls[ yoa. ;hc ehtctlixt quextiDnS apply tn a11 parts vf 3reur prcposal. tvan if you slan ta dc thna over a pari-ad ef time or an dyifersnt aarC0s of tand Attach any additional informtion that ,ri11 deSCripe 3rour pr4pasal or its tnrlrcnnental eFfecLS. The agrncy ta rhiVi you gubmit th{s checkliqt may a3k You tO expla4n yeur 8f15wefs dr pro++ide adilitl0n8l lnfonsat+an rtaspn8b7y re78CEd La detemfning if Chere mey be 5lqnifitant adverse fmpact Use of Cheek7lsd 6or, nvnproject praposais. Cosplete this checkliSt for nonproject ProRasals. even tMaugh qurstiens map be ansrarrd 'daes nat apPlY'. iN AUn[TIflllt caiPlete tha $UPPtEMEkTAL 5k[EET FOR H4MPR0,1ECT AC?IOMSfPert 0 Far nunproj~eci act7ans, the refetenceS lh Cri! ChlCkliSt t4 Che *A rd& 'OrojeCC,' 'App1fCant,` end `orapsrty or SitN' Snouid he read d5 ~pr4posd1," 'prapa#er,' and 'affeCted geagraphic ereaF' ri!5pet#lvely. A. axcxr~aUri4 3, yase of RrgPosed praaect, +f appllcadle COI+KtiIN ZONE CFIANGE . z. %a.e af aQplicant• CDNKLIN DEVFLQPMENT ~ 3 Addre55 and ancne n,..aoer af aoalicant ar contact prrson BILLIE JC} SPARLT.1dG C/0 INLA,ND PACIFIC Ei►IGINEFRING 707 WEST 7TH AVENC7E. SIIITE 20[} (509)45$-6$40 5POKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 4 Qatr thetkli5t prepared. OCTOBER 25y 1996 5, Agemy rfque5tinq Chrciillst spOxArrE caaNrff PLANNING OI'FICE 6. Proposed timin4 or 5clli~auir (+flc7„d+ng ph9#fryg, Ir aaoracabl=k. THE PItC]PDSED PR0JECT WILL I3E D~VE-LOPED AS SQDIJ AS F'INAL PROJECT APPROVALS ARE MAI]]E, . 7- a- 54 you nare an}r pldns #pr futurr edd#t#ons. expansian, ar furiher aCtiwity related to ar cc+merted vith tfii3 proposal7 !t Yes, expla+n. YES, THCRE WILT.. BE l3llILDING PERMITS OR SITE PLANS REQITIIti?D 7Id CCINNGCTIQ1d WITI3 THE PROPOSAL. . 6. na you arn or heve pptlons on land nsarby ar ad}acerst ta [his praaoseZ' tf yts. exiplein. NO ti n c? " k~ 04-- •`;~~`~I~'(~~'PA~ v`~.~ 0-Frvi~ CkrAIm kL)It'd 1 , , 3/1-4 fir c~ 9. Ljs[ ar►y rnrlronmental infCrrsa[ion you knaK rbou[ that has tiaen preparsd, or rill hr prepared, dir^ectly rtlattd ta th+s propasel. ~ONE Rew.211188 1 ~ 9P01CA71L tFVIROHW?tiAL ORDItSMCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.210(1) . ~ ~ A BAQCG30QND (eootinued) 9 Do y w 1m w vhecher appllcstions are peoding for govnrnoental •pproval@ o[ other propoeals directly affecting che propercy covered by your propooal' If yes, erplalo NONE' KNOWN 10. Llec aay govecnneot approvals or peraiu chac vill De needed for your praposal, lf lmovn SPOKANE COIINTY APPROVAI. OT ZONE CHANGE, BUILDING PERMITS AND SITE PLANt DRAINAGE, AND SEWER PLANS, TIRE DEPARTMENT AND WATER PURVLYOR APPROVAL OF WATER HOOK-DP, WILL BE REQIIIRED. 11 Glve s brlef, c m plate descrtpclon ot ywr propo"l, ineluding che proposed use• and clts •ise of c!u projec[ end ette -here ere several Quescioaa Lcer ln tAi• checScllst chac ask you to descriDe eercain u pect• of y wr pcoposal Y w do no[ need to rep u cthose anovers on thie Oe6e A ZONE CHANGE IS RE-QUESTED FOR 5 SMALL PARCELS ALONG THE SPRAGUE CORRIDOR FROM A UR 22 TO A B-3 ZONE. TXACT OSES ARE UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME. USES WILL CONrORM WITH B-3 ZONING WAICH AAS BEEN RE-QIIESTED. 1; Location of the proposal Ctve suttletent tntorm&tioe tor a person co underetand the precls• loeation ot your proposed projecc, tncludlne a streo t ♦ddtees, if any, •nd seetlon, toveti Aip •nd range, Lf tcnovn. It • atopo u 1 vould occur over a range ot erea, provtde the ranRe or boundarles ot the atce(@) ProviAe a legal descrlptlon, s1ts plan, vicinlcy oap, and topoQrapRle nAp, tt reasoru bly evat L ble Vhlle you shouid euboit any plani requlred b7l the •gencr, yw ate not reQulred to du911cate aap• or detailed plans •utnitced vtth any permtt appllcacton related to thls chacklist THE SITE IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHSIDE OF SPRAGDE AVENUC DIRECTLY EAST OF CONKLIN ROAD AND WEST 0£ CARNINE ROAD IN TAE RE-PLAT OT BLOCR 13 OF VERA IN THE SW OF SECTION 13. T.25N., R.44 E., W.M. 4Svv.ct`Q. (t-JAJ~ 13 Ooes the proposed accton lie vttRla the AQuifer Sensltlve krei (ASA)' °he General Sew r Sarvice Area' :Tu Prtortty Swer Servtce Area' 'he City of Spokane' (Se• Spolcaae County's ASA Over L y:one 4t L• for pouadarles) THE SITE LIES WITHIN THE AQIIIFER SENSITIVE' ARF.,A, THC PRIORITY S~ E-R AREA BUT OUTSIDE Or THE CITY OF SPOKANE. -0 sC COXPLP'LD 6T APPLICA2tT B. @N7IxOT2P".AL CLEMMYTg Evaluatlon for 1 EAR-n Agency Uoe Onlv a General descripclan o[ che ai[e (clrcle ooe) ! L c. rolling, hilly, scoep slopes, oouncainous, ocher. b 'Tat ls che steePesc slope oo the sice "LESS TAAN liro approxlmace pereenc slope)+ c 'Jhac general typea of aolls sre tound on the sice (for eaaople, clay, u od, gravel, peat, suck)' Lf you knov [he elaseifieatlon ot •gTlcultural mol L, speclfy thas •rd noca any prim faca laad. THE' SITE CONSISTS OF GARRISON GRAVELLY LOAM-GRAQELLY* MEDIIIM-TT.XTURED SOIL. d. kce there surface ladicacloas or histocy of unscaDle soile in the Lmediace vicinlLy' If so, describe TI3ERE ARE NO VISIBLE INDICATIONS OF i7NSTAIiLE SOII.. 2 ~ SVOKANE ENViRONMENTAL ORDIRANCE (YAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) ` • • B. ENYIROIMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) Evalua[ion For Agency Use Only e. Descrlbe the purpose. type. and approzimate quantlties ot any filling or gradSng proDOSed. Indicate source of ftll. THERE WILL BE EXCAVATION REI.ATED TO NORMAL SEWER, WATER AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use' If so. generally descrlbe. THE SITE IS CLEAR SO EROSION THAT MIGHT OCCUR DURING CnNSTRUCTION WOULD BE NON-T.XISTENT. q. About Mhat percent of tAe site vill be Covered vtth imoervtous surfates after projett construt- tion (for exartple, asphalt or buildings)' BUILDING COVERAGE CANNOT BE DC1'ERMINED AT 17HIS TIME. REQUI EMENTS Or THE ZONING CODE WOUI.D AAVE TO BE MET AS WCLL AS COIINTY DRAINAGE STANDARDS FOR ANY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. h. Proposed measurts to reCute or Control eroslon. or other impacts to the earth. it any: STANDARA CONSTRUCTION PROCEDDRE-S WILL BE UTILIZL'D AND I.ANDSCAPING WILL BE DEVELOPED AROUND COMPLETED COMMERCTAT• BUILDINGS. 2, a1a a. uhat type of enissions Co the air rould result tron the pro0osai (i.e.. dust. autanablle. odors , ndustrial, raod seoke) during ConstruCtion end when the projett 1s tonpieted7 If any, generally describe and give eoDroximate quintites if knarn. FILLING, GRADING, AND GENCRA.L CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL SLIGHTLY INCREASE BOTft DUST AND VEHICLE EIriISSIONS. ~ ONCE TAE SITE IS DEVELOPED THERE WILL BE AN INCREASE IN THE WUNT , . , , D. Are there any ott-stte SourCes Of eioiisions or Odor Chat may affett your proposal' If so. generally descri0e. NO C ProposeE measures to reduce or control emisiions or other impaCts to ttr. 1f anr DURING GRADING DIIST CAN BE CONTROLLED BY SPRINRLING OF EXPOSi'n SOILS. WHEN SITE' PREPARATIONS ANl) BUILDINGS ARE COMPLETE LANDSCAPING WILL BE ESTABLISHIED IMME-DIATELY TO CONTROL ANY POTENTIAL EROSION AND DUST. 3 uaTER a. Surface (1) ls there any surface water body on or in the trmedlate vicinity of the stte inciuding yea r round and seasonal streams. saitwater. lakes. ponds, retlandsl7 If yes, describe ty9e and provide names. If appropriate, state rhat streem ot river 1t flows into. NO (2) Yill Che project require any work over. 1n. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the descrlbed waters' If yes, please describe and attacn availe0le plans. 3 SPO[Ata E}NIROtQli,`rAL OHDiNANCL (aICC 197-11-960) Saccion 11.10.230(1) • D. CNVIRONlQNTAL eLMMti:'S (cootioued) ' • EvQluatlon Foc Agency Uee Only (7) Escimete the asount o( (111 •nd dredge oacerlal tluc vould ba p Leed ln or removed fcom the surface vster or vetlands •nd ladlcace the •cea of the •ite thac vould be affeeced Indtcsce the eource o[ fill oacecial NONE (G) vill the proposal roQulre •urfac• uacer vl[hdraval• or divarslons' GS w a general desctip- tion, purpose, snd approxlaate quantltles. 1[ knovn NO (S) Ooe• the proposal lle vithin • l0Dryear (lood plain' If so, nota louclon on the •!te plan NO (5) Does the pTOposel involve anr discTu rge• o[ vu te aaterlala co surfaee vatetsl It 60, Cescribe the type of vaste and an[lclpated voluar ot discharge NO b Cround (1) Vill groundvacet be vlthdravn, or vtll vater Ee dlacturEed co groundvater' Ctve general ~ descripclon. purpose. and appro:inace Quanti[1et, !f lmovn. NO GROUNDWATE-R WITHDRAWALS WILL BE REQDIRED OR PERMITTED ON PROJECT. VERA POWER AND WATER WILL WITRDRAW FROM EXISTING OFF-SITE WE-LLS TO SERVICE THIS PROJECT. BECAUSE THE TYPE OF BUSINE'SSES PROPOSED IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME, NO PEAR FLOWS CAN BE PROJECTED. DescriDe vaste nacerlal thac v1L1 be discharaed loto the srouod fTOm septic cank• or ot1+es saoltary vaste cssac~nt tatillt7 DascrlDe the Qaneral sl:e of tfw s7scm, the nmber ot I+ouaee to be •ervad (1t applicsble) or the numbet o( ptrsoeu the •rstea(&) •re e:pected co se rve NONE, TAE SITr WILL BE SERVED BY A SANITARY SFWER. Deseelbe •ny srstems, ocM r cdao tAos• desigaod for the Aispoaml o[ u nitary vascn, tnstalled [or the purpose of dlseharglag !luld• bslov the grwod •uctaco (lnclude• •ysces• •uch es chose for the dlspou 1 of scoro vatsr or dcainage [rom tloor draiw ) Descr1De the [7pe of systea, the aoount of naterlal co bo disposed ot through c!r systeis •nd the type• ot aateCtal• llkely co be disposed o( (including ticerial• vhleh say eucer the systs inadvercentl7 chrough sptlls or a result o[ tireflghrin; •cclvitlee). DRYWFLLS AND 208 SWALES WILL BE USED TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER FROM TRE MOST SEVERE RAINFALL EVENTS. (4) Nill any chmicals (especially organic •olvents or petroleua Cw 1s) be scoced !n •6ove- ground or uudecgrouad •torage tanlu ? It so, vhac t7pes aod quantlcies ot aacarlal• v111 be stored' ANY CHEMICALS ASSOCIATED WITH BUSINE'SSES ALLOWED UNDER THE B-3 ZONE WILL BE STORED EIBOVE GROUND. ANY PROPOSAL TO STORE' CHEMICALS UNDERGROUND WILL ftAVE TO MCET ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND COIINTY REGULATIONS. z Sror.Axe LWIsoxr¢NTAL osniyAtrce (VAt 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1) . ~ • B. CNViROMiMAL LLaDM (coatlnued) Evaluatloo For Ageney Use Only (S) whac proteecive oeasurea wtll be taken to insure tlut leAki or spills of any chemicals stored or ueed on slte vtll not be allovcd to percolate to grwndvater (th1s lncludes eessurea to keep cheeticale ouc of dleposal syetea• descrLbad ln 3b(2) anA 3b(3)' COMPLIANCE WITA APPLICABLE LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. c uater P.unoft (Sncluding stotv vatei)' (1) Deecr4De cRe source ot runof! (inciuding mcorv vater) and vec4od of collectlon and digposal if any (Snclude quantities, !f knovn) Vhere vill this water tlov' Vill tR1• vi cer [lov lnto ocher vecere' I( •o, describe STORMWATER WILI. BE TRTATED IN "208" PONDS PER COUNTY STANDARDS. THIS WATER WILL BE COLLECTED FROM THE IMPERVIOllS ARE-AS OT TRE SITE AND FLOW INTO INTO THE "208" PONDS BEOFRE RECHARGING THE AQUIFER. .1t11 any cheolca!• be stored, handled or uaed on tM slce in • lou clon whore a sptll or leati vill drsln [o surface or groundvater or Co astorm water dlspo"l syst m discharging to eurfsce or grouculvstar' NO (J) Could vaste macerial• encer ground or surtace vters' It so, generally describe NO d Propoeed oeasuree to redute or control surface. ground, and runot[ water tnpacts. Lt •or (1t t che propoaeE ♦ction lies vithio che Aqultor Sensttlve Area be •spacially tlear oa •xplaoatloos ~ r ralacing co tacllitie• concerning Saetlons 3D(4), 3b(5), •nd 3c(2) of thi• checkllsc) PROJECT WILL EMPLQY ME-TAODS COMNONLY USED FOR COMPLIANCE WITA "208" REGULATIONS. LANDSCAPING AND RE-TENTION AREAS WILL DISPOSE QF EXCESS STORMWATER RUNOFF. ~ PLLtTS a 'heck or eircle type o( vege u clon tound on the aLte• declduous tree alder, maple, aopen, orhet evergreen cree (lr, cedat, plne, ocher :hrubs rass paecure. crop or graln. vec aoil plants, uccail, buttercup, bullrw h, skumk u DDase, ocher. w cer planti• vatet 1111r, eelgrams, nllfoil, other ocher types ot vegecation. b Vhat kind snd snounc of vege utlon vlll De reuoved or •lcered, ALL TXISTING VEGETATION, WHICfl CONSISTS OF WEEDS AND SOME GRASS WILL BE DESTROYED. c Liet tAreatened or endangared •pecies Imovn co De on or near the site. NONC d. Proposed landscsping, ure ot oaclve plao u. or ocher meawre• to p nse rve oT enAance vege utlon on che elce, !f any ALL BUILDING SITES WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF DEVELOPING THIS SITE. 5 SPOKAI(E ENVIRONhtE21TAL ORDINAtICE (NAL 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) . B. :NV1ROtMENTiIL ELQIET(TS (conttnued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only 5. AN(MALS a. Circie any birds and animals whith nave been observed on or neer the slte or are known to be on or near the Site: birds na++k, heron, eegle. songoires, other. COMMON SONGBIRD SPECIES mamnals. deer, bear, elk, beaver, otner• SMALL RODENTS fish Dass, salmon, trout, herring. shelifish, other: otner . b. List any threateneG or endangereA sDecies knoun to De on or neer tAe site. NONE c. Is tne site part of a migration raute' If so, explaln. NO d. Prooosed raeasures to preserve or enhence rildltte. 1f any. NONE 5. EvERCr AND VATURAL RESOURCES a. 'ahat kines of energy (electric, natural gas. Mood stove. sotar) r111 be useE to meet the the comoleted Dro}ect's energy needs' Destrlbe whether 1t w11) be useC for heettng, aanufat- turing, etC. . TLECTRICII'Y AND NATU1tAL GAS IS PROVIDED TO TRE SITF. PRZMA.RY AEAT SOURCES ARE TXPECTED TO BE NATiTRAL GAS OR ELECTRICITY. , `1 would your pro)ect affect the potenttal use of solar energy by aQjacent prope K/es' If so. generaliy describe. NO c Whet kinds af energy conservation feetures are includeC in the plans of this proposal' List otner proposeC r.easures to reduce or control energy trnpects. If eny• THE CURRENT NORTHWEST ENERGY CODE REQIIIREMENTS ADOPTED BY SPORANE WILL BE IITILIZED IN THE BUILD-MG CONSTR~ICTTON. 7. ENYiAOltHENTAL HEALTH a. Are chere any envlro mwental healtl+ haznrds. lncluding exposure to toxic che+nicals, risk ot flre and explozion. spill, or hazardous waste. tnat could occur as a result of this proposel' lf So, describe. NO (1) Uestribe special energenty services that might be required. NO SPECIAL DE-RGENCY SERVICES BEYOND TYPICAL POLICE AND rIRT PROTECTION ARL' ANTICIPATE-D TO BE RE(1UIRED BY TAIS DEVELOPMENT. 6 ' 9POICANL LNVIEON?m7'LJI. qRDI9gYCL (VAC 191-11-960) Sectioe 11.10.210(1) D. E"IRONlSLNLAL LI.EM22IS (continued) Cvaluaclon Por Ageney Use Only Et7VIRONMEtT:AL tiEAL:'R (cooclcued) (2) Pcoposed aeasures to reduce oc concrol eoviroaawatal heal[h hasards, i[ an7 NONE b Nolee (1) Vhat cqpe• o[ nols• eslst lu t!+• area vhich oay affect 7 w r ptojecc (for eLapl• trafflc, , equipm nc, operatioa, ocRer' TYPICAL NOISE LEVE'LS ASSOCIATED WITH A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL EXIST. utuc t7pe• aod lavel• of oois• vould be created by or a uoelated vitA t M p[o3eec on a shorc-cerm or a long-tetv basls (tor ezaaple: tratfic, cons[ruction. opera[Son, othar)' indicacc vhat hour• noise vould cosa tmo the •1te SAORT TERM: CONSTRIICTION ACTIVITIES LONG TERM: INCREASE IN THE TRAFFIC NOISE. (3) Proposed oeasur• to reduee or control nols• lopects, if aoy CONSTRIICTION ACTIVITIES AND SITE PREPARATION WILL BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORRING DAYLIGHT AOURS OF OPERATION. BUFTERING WILL BE A PART OF THIS DEVELOPME'NT. a u•ro Arro sxoREu'IE USE a. Vhat 1• the current w e o( the •![e and sdJaeent properties' THE SITE IS CURRE'NTLY VACANT AND LAND ALONG SPRAGUE . ~SBiSINE~~ I.~A~TD ~0 THE NO~TH IS RESIDENTIAL BIIT ZONED B-2. D lt&s t e sl[e ea usor agr c cure It •o, descr NO c. Descrtbe any structure• oo the •ic*. THERE' ARE NO STRIICTURES ON TAE S1TE. d vtil any struccura• be desolished+ If so, vhlch' NONE e. 4`►et 1• the cuttenc soning tlueiflutioe of the •ite' UR 22 t tfiac is the curreot cmpreMnaive pLn designacion ol the sice? MAJOR COMME-RCIAL g. If •pplieable, vhat 1s tht curTent thoreline aaiter pro6ru dasignstloo o( the site• N/A h. Has aoy part of the •ite Deea classi[lad a• an 'eowiroamen[a117 aoositive' area° If •o, •peclfy. NO ! Approximately hav oaoy people vould reslde or vorlc in the cospleted ptojecc' APPRO%IMATELY 20 TO SO PEOPLE COULD WORK ON SITE WHEN FULLY OCCUPIED. 7 ' SPO1CAn IIfiRIIARdH'LaL 0&DINANCL (VAC 197-11-960) Snccion 11.10.230(1) ' ► D. eNVIRONTd1"Al. E.DtL1RS (cooticued) _valwtlon Yor Agency Use Only J Approxidacely hov maay people vould cha coopleced project dSepLcel NoNE t ProposeA measures co avotd or reduce dimplacmeet lapac[s, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure CAe proposal 1s eoapatiDle vlth szlscina and projocted land uae• aed plans, 1( •ny. AREAS SiTRROUNDING THIS SITE WHICH FRONT ON SPRAGUE ARE ALREADY ZONED B-3 OR B-2. 9 NOUSING e ApproxL9acelq hw auny unics vwld De p[o.idad, lt an72 Indicac• vhetM r hiQh-. ■iddle-, or lov-incom howing. NONE b. Appro:imacely how eanr unlts, lf aap, vould D4 e11a1eLted! Indicac• vlrt M r Algd-, oiddle-, or lov-Sncove houaing. NONE c ProposeA measures to reduce or coatrol housin6 Lopaecs, i[ aoy: N/A 10, AES:IlETICS • a Yhat la tAe tallest hetght oI •nr proposed structure(s), not SncludlnS aetenus? Vhsc t• [he principsl e:tertor buildins aacerlal(@) propowed' SIZE AND SHAPE OF BUILDING WOULD CONFORM TO B-3 ZONING REqIIIRIIKENTS. NO ERTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS AAVE BEEN SELECTED AT THIS TIME. ~ 17) C'~J~~ ~~`~v`'`~ ` . 1 ' ~ b Ifiat vlev• ln the lmaediate vlcinlcr vould be altered or obstruccedT j NONE ~,L-(' 4 c Proposed measures co [educe or coatrol uec1►4tlc lapac[s. 1t ao7r• N/A 7 C_ ~ 11 LICHT Al70 CLARL a '11ut typ• ot llght or gLre vill tlse proposal produce• '!!uc tiu o[ day vould tt oalnly oeeu[' LIGHTING OF ANY PARKING LOT OR TXTERIOR BUILDING IS ANTICIPATE-D. b. Could llght or gLre from cM tlnished pcoj4ct be a ut4t7r hasard or int4rf4r• vich •ievst NO c What e:lsting oti-site sourees ot iight or gLre tiy atfecc yaur proposal2 NoNr . d. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol lishc and g L re lapaets, ii aoy: NONE 8 ( SPU[AH6 E11PIA0lIfSZ`RAL ORD ;T7ANCE VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) ~ D. IIIVIROiOMfAL ELEMEM (cootinued) Evaluatton Fo[ 12. RPCREAZION Ageney Uec Only a. 1lhat dcsignated •cd lctoroal recreational oD9orcvattle• •re !n the lmediace viclnitr' N/A D. vould the pcoposed proJect diop Lce aor ezleclog recreatiooal uaes' If •o, descrlbe. NO c. Proposed oaaaure• [o reduce or concrol inpaccs on recreatloc, including recru tio w 1 opportuoi- t1e• to be provided by che projecc or •p9lieaec, it aoy. NoNr 13. HIS^ORIC AND GZJLTVitAL PRLSCRVA-ION a Are chere •n7r place• or oDjeec• liated on or proposed tor oacioaal, scat• or local proserva- tion reglscers knovn co De o0 or nezt to the @ltet If •o, genera117 d-sseribe. NO D. Generally describo aey landoarks or avidence ot ASstorlc archaeolosical, sc L ocitic or cultural loporuace lmovn to De on or next to the s1t• NOIJE' c ProposeE oaasures to reduce or concrol lopocts, i! •ny• . N/A 14 'MAtlSPOR"A7ION • Idsntlfy public •treeta and Aishvars servie►j the site aod deserlDe proposed aceess to the e:lsting street sysco. Shovron s1ta pLns. Lt anp ONSITE PLANS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT TAIS TIME. SPRAGITE' AVE-NIIE WILL SERVE AS TH11-: PRIMARY ACCESS TO THIS SITE. CONKLIN MAY BE USED AS A SECONDEIRY ACCESS. b 1o •St• tuTSeatlr •erved Dy publle translc? If ooc, vltic i• ttrs •pproslaat• dlstaeee co the nuraat teaessit •topT YES, BUS SERVICE IS AVAILABLE ON SITE. c. flov eaa7r parkiaa •pates vould the complated projeet ha.ei Bov saay vould the pro}ect elirdaate• TAE NU"ER OT PARKING SPACES WILL MEET COIINTY CODES FOR ULTIMATE IISE FOR SAID PROPOSED DEVELOPMCNT. TftERE IS NO PARKING CIIRRENTLY ON SITE. d uill the proposal reQulte any oov roads or •trw ts. or isprovesac• to e:iscing rads or screet• noc intluding drivevaygT It so, aececa117 descrlbe (Lodlut• vtr cties puslic or psivata). ADDITIONAL RIGAT-OF-WAY MAY BE DE-DICATED ALONG SPRAGUE AND COULD BC REQUIRED ALONG CONRLIN. C. Vill the projeet uae (or occur lu ctu lamdiace viciniey ot) uncer. rail, or air transportatioa' If so, gens[a117r deserlbe NO 9 . sroXARe E2rr1Offr2YUi. oanizaxca (VAC 197-11-960) Sectioo 11.10.230(1) . ~ ~ D. EffVIROtUZ3'J►L B.EMEIffS (eontiowd) Cvaluatlon FoT Agenc7 Usa Only ! t. Hov oany vehlculsr trips per day vould De generated by tha e mpletad project' Lt Imovn, - ' ~ lndicate vhen peak vould occur. -~A ~l ~'1.••~~~ USE HAS NOT BEEN IAENTIFIED, flOWEVER, 1J0 USE PERMITTE-D ~ UNDER THE' B-3 ZONE' WOULD GENERATE MORE' TRIPS THAN TftE ~IT c UR 22 USES. ~ t g Proposed oaasuce• to reduce or eontrol transportatfon lapaets, Lt •oy: THE BIIS SERVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR BOTH IIMPLOYEES AND - CUSTOMCRS OT ANY FACILITY. vy 15 PUBLIC SERVLCES a 'ould che projact rssul[ !n an lactaased n« d for puDllc ser►Lce• (for ezample, fire procaction. police procectlon, health care. •chools; other)T It so, generall) deaeriba TftE POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED NEED FOR PIIBLIC SERVICES SUCH AS POLICE, FIRE. DE'RGENCY RESPONSE, POSTAL WILL FEEL SOME EFFECT AS A RESULT OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT. b. Proposed oassures co reduee or coetrol dlrect lapacco on public •ervlces. •n7: AnE4UATE ACCESS AND FIRE AYDRANTS AND LIGHTING WILL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SAFETY CONCE-RNS. INCRE-ASED TARES WILL HET F riIND SOME ADDITIONAZ. SERVICES. ls L:IIt:'IES ~ ~ a Ctr e utlli curre L ~le ac the •ics: el. ccrieicy nacural g er (ratu-~ ervl elephon s~aitary aa •epeit •ysces, oc ~ b DescrlDe the ucilicle• t}ut •re proposed !or the project, cM utillt7 provldlns c1r •etvlc• •nd the ;eneral conscruetion aecivlcie• an tAe *it• or lo the Loaediac• viclnity vhich night be needed SI:WER - SPOKANE COUNTY_WATER - VERA POWCR - VE-RA - GAS WWl' - TELEPAONE - US WEST C SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, evear uader the penalc7 0( pecjury tlut tM •Dove respoorom ar• sade cruch(ully and co the Deisc ot o7l knovledge t•lso underscand cluc, •'►ould there be •or w111tu1 nierepresencecioe or villful lsck oi tull dlselosuse on ay part. tlu aRenhmar wi[hdrav •ny desermination o[ nonsigniflcaoce ttut lt alghc i~sum Ln tellaac• upon thi• cl+eekllst. Dace Itk, N(-) PTOponant ~ (Pleu • Ptlot or Type) ~ _ Proponent: _ ~ ~,.~,•G Addreu: Y~ V ltJ V~A ~'1:~ ~ ~~~~-y. r a-/~~►„~.--e-~ 9'9~n o Pnone C~ Person comple[1=g foto Date: Pfione POR STAPf 05E ONLT v Sc&ft om ber(&) revieviag checlclist: B&sed an chie •caff teviev ot che eoviconnental ehecklist and ochar partioeoc infosaaCioe. tt+e •taff• p - A. Conclude• [hac cher• ate no probabla •igaifiuot •dverse lapact• aod recomaod• • dsteroioaCion oC noosigniticance. 6 Cooclude• that proDabl• sigoifleaot advarse environmacal lapaet• do aziac tor the eurrenc proposal aed reeonoend• a micigaccd decer- miaaclon of nonslgnlficsnc• vith coaditioaa. C. Conclude• chat there are prob+ble signifi unc •dw rs• eovlrncnanncal ispacts •od recowaend• a dacersiw tioa ot signillcince. TIZ.IlIG Tim - =75.00 10 O I } OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" DR-ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department~ FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads~ADATE: April 7, 1997 PROJECT: UR-22 TO B-3 FILE ZE-068-96 / (DRZE-243-96) Hearing/Review Date: 04/23/1997 @1:30 #3 Sponsor/Applicant: BUSTER HEITMAN Section Township Range: 13-25-44 Planner: LOUIS WEBSTER Design/Review Date: (12/26/1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 5. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. CC: Applicant BUSTER HEITMAN Engineer/Surveyor PATRICK MOORE 1 r Page 2 . ~ 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/26/1996 DRZE-243-96 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 8. The County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Conklin Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10-12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Access to Carnine Street shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 12. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 13. Al1 required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 14. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: • ~ Page 3 . ~ 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/26/1996 DRZE-293-96 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner ( s) and successor (s) further agree :(1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 15. The County Arterial Road plan identif ies Sprague Avenue as a Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 in width along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue. ~ Page 9 . , 04/23/1997 ZE-068-96 12/26/1996 DRZE-293-96 16. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 18. The applicant shall have a consulting traffic engineer submit a letter indicating that approval of this proposal will not affect any of the previously analyzed intersections. 19. The applicant has previously submitted a traffic analysis for the intersections affected by this proposal. Based upon information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by the applicant at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue also has the responsibility to construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in the study warrants are now being met at this intersection if any new final plats are done for this plat it would be the developers responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone adequate surety shall be provided to insure the construction of the signalization. Kimball, Sandy / 2 From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 1997 11 * 18 AM To: Pederson, John; Webster, Louis Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean, Kimball, Sandy, Engelhard, Scott Subject: ZE-68-96 Buster Heitman - Zone Reclassifcation Importance: High I received the above referenced project application on March 28, 1997. The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as being Garrison Soils. These soils surveys are not always accurate so on site soils identification and verification is always recommended. We have no information on whether or not there are any critical areas on this site. No concept drainage plan is required for this site for the zone change application 640 -WeWrc4c94 Page 1 ~ w , • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING RESPONSIBLE OFI'ICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE TILE NUMBER(S): ZE-68-96 DESCRIPTION OT PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassifcation from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3). APPLICANT: Buster Heitman 8205 N. Division St. Spokane, WA. 99208 (509) 467-2123 LOCATION Or PROPOSAL: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, between Conlclin Road and Carnine Street in the SE '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Wasllington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING AETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined fihat it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. f1n Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not reqtiired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a coinpleted environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC ] 97-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., APril 21, 1997, if they are intencled to alter the DNS. All cotnments should be sent to the contact Person listed below. By: Louis Webster, AICP Title: Planner II Phone: (509) 456-3675 Address: Spokane CoLinty Division of Building and Planning (MS-P) West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 DAT~ ISSU~D: / 1997 SIGNATURE: COMMENTS REGARDING ENV[RONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT TI4E HEAR]NG APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to apProve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. "rhis DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper 3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 4. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Wyn Birlcenthal 7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley 8. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 9. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 10. Spokane Transit Authority 11. WA State Department of Transportation 12. Fire Protection District No. 1 13. Central Valley School District No. 356 14. Vera Water & Power .a SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION vtHCEivED PART I SPOF<ANE COUNTY , A. GENERAL INI~'C)RMATION: 0 ' NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESCNTATIVE: BIISTER ftEITMAN, CON1Wj'N0,REVM0W=rAND PLANNfNG 8205 NORTH DIVISION STREET W, MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: SPORANE STATE: WA ZIP: 99208 PHONE: 509-467-2123 (work) (home) II' APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: SAME PHONE: MAILIIVG ADDRESS: CI1'Y: STA'I'E: ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 1_ F4 ArrPc ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acees or sq. ft.) NONE t1SSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45134.1439, 40, 41, 42, &44 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N/A EXIST'ING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTAI3LISHED) UR22 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY PROPOSED ZONING B-3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY MAJOR COMMCRICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL VALLL'Y SCHQOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT TIRE DISTRICT #1 WATER PURVEYOR VERA PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single fainily ciwellings O Duplexes O Multifamily dwellings O Manufactured homes O IIusiness (X) Industrill O Mixed Usc O Otlier ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROAERTY: B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSII+ICATION INrORMA1'ION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: TIir: SouTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 TOWNSHII' 25 RANGE 44 NAME Or PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: SPRAGUE AVENUE AND CONKLIN ROAn, A.LSO SOME FRONTAGE ON CAR.NINE ROAD WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 519 rEET . , . . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAI, HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS SPRAGUE AVTNUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED. LOTS 7.8.9,10 AND 12 BLOCK 1, OF SIIBDIVISION OF BLOCK 13, OF URA EXISTING ZONE(S) UR 22 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_B-3 FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW. _ SAME AS ABOVE IF YOLJ DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTCREST IN IT? _ N/A WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARR.ANTED? ADJACENT PROPERTIES HAVE, BEEN REZONED TO B-3. THIS REZONE WILL MATCH ZONING IN TAE SURROUNDING AREA PARTICULARLY ALONG TRE SPRAGUE AVE-NUE CORRIDOR. WHAT TMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? THE CHANGE FROM THE UR 22 ZONE TO TAE B-3 WOIILD BE IN KEEPING B-2 ZONING TO THE NORTH OI' TAIS PROJECT. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? THE COMPREAENSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS THIS REZONE. ADJACENT PROPERTIES HAVE RECEIVED ZONE ITPGRADCS AND THIS IS IN KEEPING WITH THE PROJECTED IISE OF THE SPRAGUE AVLNUE CORRIDOR. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOIIR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? BUFrERING BETWEEN TAIS SITE AND THE B-2 SITE TO THE NORTH MAY BE REQUIItE-D. THE BUFFE-RING WILL MEET COIINTY STANDARDS. , • . P ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 1 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF VVITH WRITTEN VE2IFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPUSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTIO NO. I B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) IA E NOT)' BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATE D FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATC NOW IIECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINCD AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: ~ ~ FIRE DISTRICT 1 IGNATURFJTITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR ' A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS ffitAM (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: ~ , 1C ~ L=~h~i:-~,~Z..~~\~~~~ ~f - , ~ ~ ~v WATER DISTRICT / SIGNATUAE/TITLE DATE COUNTY E NGINEER ' A PRE-LIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIItEMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRA,INAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: . d ~4 SGNATUR DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PIZE-LIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL 12EQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FQR THIS SITE IS ~~ep, A. COMMENTS: w A 'r~ r S-c c s t t ~ ; ~ A c_._ &~,Jr ~,~_es SIGNATUREII'ITLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAC ER.AL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) -,iAVC NO IIEEN SATISFIED. A. COMMENTS: Pu,~~ G Se~'P~c-~1- l~ QA-L~ ; ~ J - a SIG ATU ITLE A SEWER PURVEYOR ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: S P ~,•J -e l . ~ ~ j ) ~ It l~1 SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ~r _ • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 .••04 wnsr~;,~~~,,p PART III M , SURVCYOR VERIFICATION . o EM3IG D, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFQRMATION R- AD.F~ E ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCCtIPTION. '~~,'•.~QISTg~: *0'y~L•L•~ GNE DATE: EXPIRE3 i2 08 SS: 707 West th Su i te 200 pypNE: 458-6840 Spokane, WA Zip: 99204 PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEA,R OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENT'IFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISiHER BEHALF. NAME: Conkl i n Devel opment b.y Buster Hei tmanDpTE; 11i 1/96 ADDRESS: 8205 North Di vi s i on Street pHpNE; 467-2123 CnnkanP WA ZIP: 99208 ~ 11/1/96 AA& I NATURE O 4APPL11CMANK R REPRESENTATNE DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE IN SIGNED AND SWORN (JR AFFIRMED BEFO ME ON THIS ; t DAY OF r 1996, BY n -ARY S ~ (Notary F6blic 'ji, and fa~ the State of Washington ~N1~-- Residing at: ~ .~a ~ • ' My appointment e pires: w ~ PART V (TO BE COMPLETED IIY THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING) DATE SUBMITTED: FILE 2 E' 0 DATE ACCEPTED: BY: TOTAL FEES: -0I ~ JO .U ~ RECEIPT r D . NOTICE OF APPLICATION RECEIVED PURSUANT TO IMPLEMENTATION OF ESHB 1724 EB o 3 I`4y/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION #9b-029~ The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (Review Alithority) is providing aLO Etneerin Notice of Application to provide the opportunity to provide comment on the below described proposal. You have 14 calendar days from tlle date issued to provide written comments to tlie review authority. The file may be examiiied between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays) in the Planning Division of the Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Wasliington. If you have questions, you may call the assigned planner at the phone number listed at the bottom of the page. FILE NUMBER: ZE-68-96 TYPE OT APPLICATION: TYPE ITI OWNER: Buster Heitman 8205 N. Division Street Spolcane, WA. 99208 (509) 467-2123 DATE OF APPLICATION: December 26, 1996. DATE OF DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: January 22, 1997 PROPOSED PRO,TECT: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in tlie Regional Business (B-3) zone. PROJE, CT SITE: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, behveen Conklin Road and Carnine Street in the SE'/4 of Section 13, Townsllip 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spolcane County, Washington. EXISTING ZONIlVG: Urban Residential-22 (UR-22). OTI-IE, R PERMITS: None. I'URTHER STUDIM S REQUESTED: A traffic analysis has been completed and is part of the fi le. ENVIItONNM, NTAL DOCUMENTS: Review of existiiig development regulations, proposed zoning, and typical recommended conditions and or mitigating measures indicate likely State Environmental Policy Act Determination will be a Determination ofNonsignificance. WRITTEN COMIVIENTS: V1/ritten comments may be submitted regarding the proposal and ihe environmental review process. All comments received within 14 calendar days of tlie date issued below will be considered by the review authority prior to malting a clecision on this application. DEVELOPMENT RL, GULATIONS: Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Spokane County Standards for Roacfs, Sewer construction, Spol:ane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the regulations of the Spokane Regional Health District are the primary regulations applicable to site development. CONSISTENCY: In consideration of the above referenced development regulations and typical conditions and/or mitigating measures the proposal is found to be consistent with the "Type of lariCi US°", "level of deve!oprraen±", ":rifl'1s*rac*ure", alld "character cf dev~!0p]iZCri+..". ACTION: This is a Type III decision subject to a future public hearing. A Notice of Hearing shall be issued a minimum of 15 days prior to the public hearing. A written reportJsta.ff analysis which includes the SEPA determination will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days prior to the public hearing. RI iVIE, W AUTHORITY: Louis Webster, AICP, P(anner II James L. Manson, Director Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P) 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 ~ ~ , l } Date Tssued: Signature: r~ cn I N• ~ (D b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ ~ IOTS 7 T149UCM 10 AND LOT 12, BIOpC 1 Of RfPLAT Of BLOCK 13 Of VERA ~ AS PFR PLAT RECORDED IN V'OWME It OF PL1TS, PAG£ 27 SPONSER BUSTER H0111AN cONKUN oEvELoPMENT S~TF DATA w 8205 aw~a+ - sPoiwiE, wn 99208 E)asnNC zor+E uR-22 (569) 467-2123 PROPOSED IONE 8-3 ~ HcHn uAP II i ~ -~1 -----J--------j------ -1--.~_.~---1-_ ~._~~J I ~ a I ~ L L RIVERSiDE AVE. ~ ~ ~ ~ T ----~,--~-----T------- ~ r--------~ I , ~ ~ I I~y ~ I I I ~ I p~ 1 ~ I ~ ~J ► I I I I (4~~ ~ . G I ~ ~ C, I ~ s ~ 5 Y zi ~ I I I I ~ ~ U ~ C~ I 103,24' 10&00' 10i.00' - - - - - - - - - - 105,00' 10&00' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 1~ I Q~ I CftAPH1C 9GlF i! I a0 w 4 4 7 ~ g ~ g io 12 ~ ~ ~~fL~ Ias.W L- -------.i ~ . ~ swRAcuE AvExuE RE'.3011ED lR spOKa,NE CDUNTY Z0NE RECLASSMCATION ~ OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOT 12 , BLOCK 1 U l~;~~ OF REPLA.T OF BIACK 19 OF YERA ~ P ENmEEMM IACATED IIN THE 30UTHEAST 1/4 OF 3EGTIOH 15, T.25 N., R.44 S., W.M. ,,,,,ast ,m .&a. 200 c50, 4ft-ow 4°~~` '"X ~0"1°°'°"; D1VlSlaN OF 6UILDINO ANO plANN1NG $pOKANE COUNTYP WAff$M ,OE RECORD ! ~a ZE~68~96 / ~ ~ ~ • " . , 1 1 ~ g r'o•,, ~ w ' r •RI DGE N*4506 ~ ~ • . ' O • ~ r B ROA D:: A1r' Av E. ~c . . 'r F11'C - (3 • . }a t i on :SleCt r'a o Q ^ 1 > ~ LE WA~ c . - - ~ • ~ ~ r Mni N _ 7 • P"1. Aj AV ~i~ ~ ~ 4 Y 2 _ J cc < - S PRAGUE c Ay V .(y+.~.~ ` ~ ~ ' , ;V . 'c Y . ' T \/E ~ ALE , . ST. P ~P RR GG. - ~ - _ _ -_Z. [c ~i •o C T H V Z -A.T ul ~ ~ 6"' ~•~E 2 ~ BR'QGE 6~- ' E'LL.EY N- A so 9 TM ~'h ' ~~n~ro~- ;V Q ~ ~•eY~, ~ " LrAl1 L.i w . .:~?1; ~~f•1' , e~~i• ~ ? ~ ~~Ia~ ~ I G H'., Av E ` : ~ : ~ ' 7 ^ _ - , ..•-:~:t~.'~.`•r' 24 , ~ . . ~ l ~ ' 9 TN •C:V. ~ ~ ~:~•N : ~ a, ~ d 'Al • ~ is TH av ~ • W F Vicinity Map • . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Eax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" DR-ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: 12/20/96 PROJECT: UR-22 TO B-3 FILE / (DRZE-243-96) Hearing/Review Date: Sponsor/Applicant: BUSTER HEITMAN Section Township Range: 13-25-44 Planner: LOUIS WEBSTER Design/Review Date: (12/26/1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting Prior to release of a building perinit or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. CC: Applicant BUSTER HEITMAN Engineer/Surveyor PATRICK MOORE c Page 2 • 4 12/26/1996 DRZE-293-96 5. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 8. The County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Conklin Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10-12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Access to Carnine Street shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 12. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 13. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 14. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: . Page 3 . 12/26/1996 DRZE-293-96 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. I f a RID is proposed f or improvement of the road ( s) described below, said owner ( s) and successor (s) f urther agree : (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased t rue and f air value improvement ( s) add ( s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 15. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 in width along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue. Paqe 9 12/26/1996 DRZE-243-96 16. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 18. The applicant shall have a consulting traffic engineer submit a letter indicating that approval of this proposal will not affect any of the previously analyzed intersections. 19. The applicant has previously submitted a traffic analysis for the intersections affected by this proposal. Based upon information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by the applicant at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue also has the responsibility to construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in the study warrants are now being met at this intersection if any new final plats are done for this plat it would be the developers responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone adequate surety shall be provided to insure the construction of the signalization. PAGE 1 • . 16:01:20 21 NOV 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 04538 SPRAGUE AV (STAR.T) 00.000 HAVANA ST & SPOKANE U 14 PAVED 48 SPR.AGUE AV 00.120 DEARBORN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62 00.250 CUSTER RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62 " 00.370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62 00.500 CARNAHAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 60 00.710 MCKINNON ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60 00.840 HOWE ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60 01.000 FANCHER RD U 14 PAVED 68 01.310 DYER RD (START) U 14 PAVED 68 01.380 DOLLAR RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 01.430 DAVID ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82 01.510 THIERMAN ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82 01.560 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 01.620 BR.ADLEY RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82 01.680 DOR.A ST ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82 01.750 COLEMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 01.890 G I RARD RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82 02.000 PARK RD U 14 PAVED 82 SPRAGUE AVE 02.440 VISTA RD & LEWIS RD. U 14 PAVED 76 S PR.AGUE AV 02.560 S I PPLE RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 76 02.590 BESSIE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 76 02.710 SARGENT RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 02.750 DALE RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82 02.860 DISHMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 02.900 BR 4594 UNDERPASS FO U 14 PAVED 70 02.990 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 14 PAVED 70 03.060 DISHMAN-MICA RD (END U 14 PAVED 80 03.120 WILLOW RD U 14 PAVED 80 03.240 LOCUST RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82 03.370 FARR RD U 14 PAVED 82 ~ 03.460 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 14 PAVED 82 . 03.550 WALNUT RD U 14 PAVED 82 03.620 HER.A.LD RD ( START ) U 14 PAVED 82 03.650 DARTMOUTH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 03.760 FELTS RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82 03.800 BALFOUR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88 03.870 RAYMOND RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88 03.990 UNIVERSITY RD U 14 PAVED 88 , 04.180 G I LL I S RD ( S TART ) U 14 PAVED 88 04.280 MOFFITT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88 • 04.370 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88 04.510 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 88 04.680 FOX RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88 04.750 UNION RD {END} U 14 PAVED 76 04.810 PERRINE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88 04.870 ROBIE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88 05.000 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 14 PAVED 88 , 05.110 HOUK RD (END) U 14 PAVED 86 05.130 HOUK RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 • 05.520 MCDONALD RD U 14 PAVED 86 05.580 CLINTON RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 05.660 MCCABE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 05.760 BLAKE RD U 14 PAVED 86 05.850 MAYHEW RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 06.010 EVERGREEN RD U 14 PAVED 86 06.110 BOLIVAR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 PAGE 2 • - 16:01:20 21 NOV 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 06.180 BANNEN RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86 06.300 BEST RD (END) U 14 PAVED 86 06.510 ADAMS RD U 14 PAVED 86 06.760 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 86 07.030 SULLIVAN RD U 14 PAVED 86 07.510 CONKLIN RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 07.640 CARNINE RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 07.910 STEEIV RD ( END ) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 08.030 FLORA RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 08.220 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 SPR.AGUE AVE 08.270 APPLEWAY AVE & TSCHI U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44 SPR.AGUE 08.340 SPRAGUE U 16 PAVED 20 SPRAGUE AV 08.440 MANIFOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 08.540 LONG RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 08.630 ARTIES CT (START) U 16 PAVED 20 08.680 MOEN ST (END) U 16 PAVED 20 ' 08.770 GREENACRES RD U 16 PAVED 20 09.040 BARKER RD U 16 PAVED 20 09.180 HARMONY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 09.390 HOLIDAY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 09.530 HODGES RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 SPR.AGUE AVE 09.980 GLENBROOK ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20 SPRAGUE AVE (END) 10.050 HENRY RD U 17 PAVED 20 04845 SPR.AGUE AVE (START) 00.000 TSCHIRLEY RD U 19 PAVED 30 SPR.AGUE 00.090 SPRAGUE U 19 PAVED 30 04621 S PR.AGUE AV ( START ) 00.000 I DAHO RD R 09 GR.AVEL 18 SPR.AGUE AV (END) 00.150 IDAHO STATE LINE R 09 GRAVEL 18 04540 SPRAGUE AVE (LIBERTY 00.000 LIBERTY LAKE RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 SPR.AGUE AV (LIBERTY 00.050 BR 5507 LIBERTY LAKE R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.080 MCKINZIE DR (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.140 GARRY DR (LIBERTY LA R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.310 WRIGHT BV (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.420 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.480 WARD RD (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 ~ 00.630 CLUBHOUSE RD (LIBERT R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.800 HILLVIEW RD {LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.990 OVERLOOK RD (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.110 GAGE ST (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20 04537 SPRAGUE RD (START) 00.000 WEST END AT LINCOLN R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10 SPR.AGUE RD 01.010 STROUP RD R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 10 02.000 COULEE HITE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24 03.040 LADD RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 18 03.660 RR TR.ACKS R 09 GR.AVEL 18 04.040 WOOD RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 . 04.930 U.S. ARMY PERSUINT S R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 SPR.AGUE RD (END) 05.040 RITCHEY RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 5 Records Processed PAGE 1 • . 16:01:51 21 NOV 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00763 CONKLIN CT (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40 CONKLIN CT (END) 00.040 22ND AVE U 19 PAVED 40 00627 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 4TH AV (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CONKLIN RD 00.250 SPRAGUE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.310 RIVERSIDE AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.380 MAIN AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.500 VALLEYWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CONKLIN RD (END) 00.750 BROADWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00629 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO ANTLER R 09 GR.AVEL 18 CONKLIN RD 00.500 ANTLER RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 18 01.630 LAUREL RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 18 02.040 LAUREL RD ( END ) R 09 GR.AVEL 18 03.540 BUTTON RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 18 03.790 BLANCHARD RD R 09 GRAVEL 18 CONKLIN RD (END) 04.350 NELSON RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 24 00781 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO 22ND AV U 19 PAVED 40 CONKLIN RD 00.100 22ND AVE (END) U 19 PAVED 40 00.190 RIDGEMONT DR (START) U 19 PAVED 40 CONKLIN RD (END) 00.330 VERA CREST DR U 19 PAVED 40 00788 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO LONGFEL U 19 PAVED 40 CONKLIN RD 00.030 LONGFELLOW AVE (STAR U 19 PAVED 40 00.100 HEROY AVE ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40 CONKLIN RD (END) 00.210 WELLESLEY AVE U 19 PAVED 40 00625 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 JACKSON RD R 09 GR.AVEL 16 CONKLIN RD (END) 01.860 44TH AV • R 09 GR.AVEL 20 00626 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 44TH AVE (START) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 CONKLIN RD (END) 00.990 32ND AV (START) & SA R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 00628 CONKLIN RD (START) 00.000 TALLMAN RD R 09 GRAVEL 14 CONKLIN RD (END) 00.970 DEER CREEK RD R 09 GRAVEL 14 8 Records Processed PAGE 1 • • 16:02:05 21 NOV 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00764 CARNINE CT (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40 • CARNINE CT (END) 00.120 22ND AVE U 19 PAVED 40 00714 CARNINE RD (START) 00.000 SPRAGUE AV CARNINE RD 00.060 RIVERSIDE AV (END) CARNINE RD (END) 00.120 MAIN AV (END) 2 Records Processed t • a ~7 ~ ~A~., V,rtl ' . t DFP fi 1'0 F.NT OF Bt?1mm(-. AND 1'I A;Vtil',:t 1 • I~i'.'I~~~ i~F. .1'!!E PUBLIC x Vi1vF;> i)E['A1,7\i: 1 . ;~•'~1 , . 1' E I ~:e:! , , aEC~~~ nI i:ti1c~i~:~N n t I nl ~ 1996 NO 't'O: 1'at I-larPcr. Spokanc C'ouiity [)ivision ol'I:nginr,--!-im, Jim IZccl, Spokane County Division of Utilities titeve I loldrrby, Srokane Cuunty I-leallh I)istrii, Vvyn E3irl:enthal, Spokane County Parks, Rccreiiti, Stc;vc: VVurley, titormwater Utility 13i1) Ilcmtliings, ()evelopment Enginccring Servic, ( ircg Figg, Department offransportation Ulcn h1iles, Spokane Regional "rransportation Comi, l'hristine F«eston, Spokane Transit Authority tiusan Wincliell, Rounclary Review I3oard Central VaIley Scllool District No. 356 Firc t)istrict No. 1 Ver.i \k'uter X, 1'ower FIZOM: .fohri 1'Cderson, tie»ior l'lannm' I);1T 1:: No►ve»>her N. 1906 ~ ~ , ItE. I:~•~~1:►~;~... ~ A Il( i 1(j'~ .~c t i.i' i1_ .o"\,l) I) I ',11I:I \I! ",1 '.I! I I i\ 1)EI('EIM13EIt 26, 1996 A`l' 1: I5I'1 I I)IVIS1Oti OF lil►li.IIIN(; .1ti'il 1'1,ANNIti(: I" Fi ( )p: c c i'\I 1[:I I!;~ ►~1 ,tiutr: I hrvsh„1d l r:iftic :An.iksis cii-cul:ited bN liil:iiid 1':1citic I-.noincci-ii11, l'Ie.►sc rc;\,-i<<v tltc: aho~,c applicalion an(l use the attachecl AI'I'LtC,'1 flON ACCLI' I A i. iDt:S1GN Itt;vit-:w NII:f:T1N(i I.-URM lur your coiliment:;. 'l'Iie 1)ivisiun ol* Biiildinc: ancl 1'IAlllll[lg CIlCC1U1'agc.~s yuur rresence i1l IIUS I11tCU11g. 'l'he sponsur and represcntative 11:i, liccn invitec1 to aisu attend. ifYou ciin nut attencl, rlease fiOrwarcl vottr revievti comme.•i on lhe attachcLi iimm tci I.ouis Wchstcr ior tlie meeting. 'I'he attach«1 AI'f1I.IC'A'H()N AC'('l-.i'FANCE: r1N[) UESIC;N IZI:VII-'W I:i)ItmS will he glven tti thc spontic~r al lhe ntecliiit, and inc:luclcd in the nivision OH3u11cling a»d I'lanning lilr (so briiig thrcc copieti to lli »>eetiiig). 'I'hzinks lur yoiic cooperation. Ufyuu have any ciuestions aboul thc aprlic.it, pIe.ise contiict [.ouis lVchstcr ol'ihc I)ivisiun O1'I3uilLlilig and t'Ianning zit 456-21-'( C: 13us1er I(eiliiicin. C'unl:lin I)evelol»nent, K?O> N. I)ivision St., ~pokane. W:`% 99208 ~1 -7 ;?i L~III'.~.' ~~l(1 ~~},I ,!11A~, \ i.. , A'.~ fSt11Lt)INt. ('iiONL• (ril)')) 45h-3(j7', • 1-:1.y (;f~09) •~`~1~-•1:'U.~ (509) -1`.iG-?205 • 1'AX. (5()9).;ri()-??•~3 TDIa (509) 124 1166 • ; Design Review for DecemUet- 26, 1996 at 1:15 p m. Buster lIeitman Zone Reclassi fication Generally located north af ancl adjacent to Sprague Avenue, beiween Conklin Road and Carnine Street in ihe SE '/a of Section 13, Township 25 North, IZange 44 EWM, Spokanc County, Washington. COMPRE-IIENSIVC PLAN: Majoi- Commercial and witllin lhe 1'riority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) 1'ROJrCT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclasscfication fYOii1 Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional l3usiness (13-3) for those tises zlloN.ved in the Regional 13usiness (B-3) zone. 1'ARCEL NUMI3LRS 45134.1439, 14401.1441, 1442, .1444 SITE S1ZE: Approximately 1.64 acl•es. A1'PLICANT: Buster IIeitman 9205 N Division St. Spolcane, WA. 99208 (509) 467-2123 ASSIGNrD PL,ANNER I.,ottis Webster . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ZONE RECLASSI1'ICAT1O~ ~~~~~~~~~ION ~IAIZT I 'Ll['~ ~y A. ~ ENERAL TNI+ OIZMATI(7N. NAME OF APPLICANTfREl'RESENTATIVE- BUSTFR IiEITMAN, CONKLI]►1: +DEVL-'Ii[}PMLNT,htt) f'l ANNYNG MAIL1NG ADDRCSS: 8205 AI[IRTH DIVISTON S'I1tCE`C 'e CITY: SPCIKANE STATC WA ZIP 9920$ FHONE. 509-461-2123 (work) (home) IF AI'PLICANT I5 IVQT OWNLR, INCLUDG WRITTEN OWNER AC]TI-IC1RTZATiC}N I'OIZ AI'PLICANT TO SERVE AS REI'R+ CSCAITATiVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAMC SAKE PHON~- MAILING ADDRESS: CITY; STATL. ZIP PRQJECTIPRQPOSAL SiTE AREA (acres or sq, ft) _ 1_64 j rrpc ADJACCNT ARE A OWNGQ OR CONTR[]LLE-13 (acrec, or sq. fit ) T+1ONE ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PR01ECT1PROPOSAL 45134. 1439, 40, 41, 42, &44 ASSESSOR PARCEL VS OF AI]JACENF ,AT2EA OVVNE-D DR CON'I'ROLLE-D 5nzEET ADDRESS OF PROPO5AL N JA EXIST1NG ZOIVE CLASSIFICATION(S) {DA'F'E ES'rABL1Sf1ED) UR22 CXISTINC USE OF PROPF-RTY F'ROf'DSEI7 ZONING B-~ COMP12LHENSIVC PLAN CATEGORY MA.TOR COMh'LERICAT, SCI-IOCL DISTRIC"I` CENTR+AL VALLEY SC1iOOl, DISTRICT 1=IR.E Di5TRlCT ll'IRE DYSTRICT #l_ WATCRPURVEYOR VrRA PTLOPOSED L15E t7f{ PRC)PERTY. Siriglc Fainzly dtivClillygs DLtPIcxes ( ) ~~u~~~~~Y~nidy dwelidngs { ) Maiiufactured tioines ( ) I3usiiies5 Industi ta! ( ) Ivlrxccl [Jsc [ } Otlier ( ) - Dcscribe L1ST PREV10US PLA1VNiNG DGPARTMEN'I' AC'['IUN5 11VVOLVINC '!'Fi1,SPROPEIZI"Y 13. LELIAl.1lfJONJ.~ REW1JASLl.Ll'It+ATlAJN JNFllRMAIJON: l-c~CArlON or• PROPo~AL TH~, snu~r~~~~ns'r 01lArt~~I,~t ar 5ECT1ON 13 TOWN5Htl' 25 RA1~GF~ 44 , lVAME OF PUI3L1C ROAD(S) PRQV]DING ACCESS SF'RAGl1E AVl,-_Nfllr AN-D CC}NKLIA1 ROATI, A1aSO S4JME 1'I1O1'1rIyfiiiE iJ1Y C1Y.JlIVINE 11L~A-D WIDTH or PRoPER'rY FROtv'rING otv PvBLac Ro~~ 9J,5 r• E'rT ± . ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSI\L HAVE ACCCSS TO AN ARTCRIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES O NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL I20AUS SPE2ACUE AVENUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Or PROPCRTI' FOR EACH ZONE RCCLASSIFICATION PROI'OSCD. LOTS 7.8.9.10 AND 12 RT.OCK 1, OF SUl3D7VISI0N 0F BLOCK 13. OF VERA CXIS1'ING ZONE(S) , UR 22 TO YROPOSED ZONC(S) _ R-3 FOR TI-lr FOLLOWINC DCSCRIBEU PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL UESC121PTION STAMPEU BY LANU SURVCYOR OR PROVIDL IIELOW. SAMC AS Ai30VE IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, bVHA'I' IS YOUR 1NTEREST IN IT? _ N/A WHAT ARE THE CHANCED CONDITIONS OP THE A2CA WHICH YOU rCEL MAKE TH[S PROPOSAL WARRANTED? ADJACENT PROPCRTxCS NAVI: 13ECN REZONrD 7'0 li-3 . THTS RI:ZONl: WIT L MATCII ZnNING IN THE SURROUNDINC ARr..A PAR'CICULARIaY ALQNC THE SPRAGUT AVENUE CORRIDOR. WHAT IMf'ACT WILI. THE I'ROPOSED ZONC RECLASSIFICATION HAVC ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTLES? THE CHANGf; T'ROri TA1: UR 22 ZONE TO THE li-3 WOULD BC IN KEL'PING B-2 'LONING TO THE NORTH 0F 7'H1S PRO.ircT. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONC RECLASSIFICATlON? TftE COAtPRrAtiNSIVE PLAN SUPPORTS TNIS REZONE. Al)JACENT PROPERTIES HAVC RrCL'YVED ZONE UPGItA.DES AND THIS IS IN KEEPING WITH THE PROJECTE1,1 USE Or THE SPRAGUr AVCNUC CORRIDOR. NVMAT MEASUnES ll0 YOU PROPOSL 1'O MITIGATC YOUR PROP4SAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE9 I3DFrCRINC RE`l'WETN THT S SITI"s ANn THl? 13-2 S`CTE TO THI. NOR1'H MAY l3F ItEQU7:I1ED . THE I3UrrERING WILTa MEET COUN1'Y STANDARDS. . , ZONE RECLASSTFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION W1LL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFr WITH W[ZITTEN VE2IFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELINIINARY CONSULTATION WITH 'I HC AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OH THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITI'AL TO THC PLANNING DEPARTMENT. rIltC AIARSHALL/FIRC DISTRIC'I' A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTCCTIO " ,J&ERIJ~E NO. I B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVI;) -iAVE NOT) IIECN MADE TO MCCT OUR NCCDS 1N PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUA'I E WATE Y-S'4:E-M-)CND FACILITIES FOR FIRE YROTECTION PURPOSCS. -7-`~~ C. RECOMMENDED FIRE f'LOW: / 1~~._> , OR UNAI3LE TO CALCULATE NOW 13ECAU5C USE IS NOT DEF=INITIVE; AND W1LL BE DE"I'C[tM1NCD AZ' BUILDING PCRMIT AQPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE. . , ~~K41j 1/~lr ~~-f~~.~ % r ~J , 7 FIRE DISTRICT SIGI~1AfURCfrI'I'LC DA'I'E WATER PURVCYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARItANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND r1RE ri.OW REQUIRCMENTS (4kAW (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE 13. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: ~ x WATCR DISTRICT ~ SIGNATUAE/I'ITLE DATE COUN'I'Y ENGINECIt A P2CLIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS 'T'AICEN PLACF AND GENERAL RCQUIREMENTS rOR fZOAD5 AND DRAINAGE HAVC BEEN DISCUSSED WITI-i'I'HC APPLiCA1VT. A. COMMENTS. ~ - C, Z/ S CNATUR /T TLE DATE COUNTY U1'ILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS '1'AKCN PLACE AND GCNERAL RCQUlREMENTs roR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (IIAVC NOT) IIEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS ~EJeA ~ A. COMMENI'S: ~ f L Jr- SIGNATUREfrITLE DA'CC HCALTII llIS1'RICT A PRELIMINARY I7ISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAC AND-GEqC12AL REQUIREMCNI'S FOR SUI3M1'T"I'AL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) I-IAVE NOT4 BEEN SA'I'ISfICD. A. C O M M E NTS : R-l-W C,~ , ~ .i~ ~ ~J SIGI~ATUfZ~ITLE y DA 1'E SCWLR I'URVL'YOIt A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKCN PI.,ACE AND GENEI2AL IZEQUIRrMCNTS FOR 'I'I-IC 1'ROVISION OF PUDLIC SEWER AIZE UNDERSTOOD IIY THC APPLICANT. /1 A COMMENTS: ( ri►jrj e LSIGNATUREfI'1TLE DATE . y ZONE RECLASSII=ICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 4S. • o~ wasNI~; ~0PART III • co~ SURVEYOR VEIZ1r1CATION . • • : I, T EMIG D, A LICENSEU LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMI'LETCD THE INrORMATION R D.F E ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPT'ION. . •.~°QIST~~':••'••....•• 0*qL LAO S GNE . DA1'E: EXPIRE3 12 08 SS 707 West th Su i te 200 plipNE: 458-6840 Spokane, WA ZlP 99204 PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY 4WNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE AI30VC RCSPONSES A1tE MADC TRUTI-IFULLY AND TO THE IIEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I I=URTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF FtECORD OF THE AREA PROE'OSED FOR THE YIZEVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED 1.,AND USE ACT10N, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HfiREW1TH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM I'HE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. NA.ME: Conkl i n Devel opment by Quster Hei tmanDATE: 11/1/96 ADDi2ESS: 8205 North Di vision Street PHONE: 467-2123. ~nP tiJA ZIP: 99208 , ' i 11/1/96 91 NATURE O APPLICANT J2 REPCtESCNTATIVE DATE STATE OF WASHINGT4N ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFOR ME ON THIS DAY OF ~ ~S, 1996, BY ~A- . ' 1 ; ARY S 40t rNotary~hbfic in and fo'r the Siate of Washiugton ~ Residing at: • I'T % . ~ _ ~ ,1___-~ ! l My appointment eipires. ~18H~N / PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THC llIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING) DA1'C SUIIMITI'ED: FILL DATE ACCEPTED: IIY: TOTAL, rEES: RECEIPT ♦ j y SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATIQN PART I A. GENFRAL INF4RMATION; NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIWE: BIISTER HEITMAN, CONRLIN DEYELOPMENT , MAILING ADDRESS: $205 NORTH DIVISION STREET CITY: SPORANE STATE: wA ZIp: 99208 PHONE: 509-467--2123 (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: SAME PHONE: MAII.ING ADDRESS: CITY: , STA'TE: ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 1_ 64 Br-rPc ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) NONE ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45134.1439, 40, 41, 42, &44 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N/A EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR22 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY , PROPOSED ZONING B-3 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY MAJOR COMKERIGAL , SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT #1 , WATER PURVEYOR VERA . PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes Business Industcial Mixed Use Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: B . LEC,AL/ZQNE RECLASSIFICATIQN INFORMA'TInN; LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: IM SOUTHEAST QIIARTER OF SECTION 13 T4WNSHIP 25 RANGE 44 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS. SPRAGUE AVENUE AND CONRLIN ROAD, ALSO SOME FRONTAGE ON CARNINE ROAD , WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 515 FEET ± • •d . , ♦ 1 ! • I ~1 1~ ~ r J r • ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTIO ,NO. I B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) A E NOT BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATE D FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIlViE. D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: ~ FIRE DISTRICT IGNATURFJTITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS ff*&NN) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: -7 , X ~ C~'~ \ ~ • " WATER DISTRICT ~ SIGNATUftFJTITLE DATE COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: ~ \ \ ~ ~ LO 4GNATUR11 U-s - ~4 E DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS WZA A. COMMENTS: Cftr -v~*A-,e A4-f- r S-ccj t ce. At SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAC ERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) AVE NO BEEN SATISFIED. A. COMMENTS : ~ f ~ SIG ATU E A , SEWER PURVEYOR ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: c U-i-e I/ . ~ (.j _ . t~ ~iCo ~ ~L SIGNATUREfTITLE • DATE ~s + . t 1 RECEIPT SUMMARY ~ ~ • f Y- < TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9602013 DATE: 11/05/96 APPLICANT: CONKI,IN DEVEI,OPMENTS PHONE= 509 967 2123 ADDRE33: 8205 N DIVISION SPOKANE WA 99208 CONTACT NAME: CONKLIN DEVELOPMENTS PHONE= 509 467 2123 TRANSACTION: ZONING (ENGS), LAND USE ACTION REVIEW DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) CONMENTS: PARCEL N0.95134.1439 (2) CHECK(3) - NOS.1081 & 1083 FEE & PAYMENT SUHIlKARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00 REZONE REVIEW 1 25.00 TOTAL DUE = 225.00 TOTAL PAID= 225.00 ' BAI.ANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 11/05/96 00011915 1083 225.00 PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA **,r~~*********~~***************,t THAIJK YOU **~~********~rr*~**~**~*~*****~****~~ 1 PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT Ualc Number ~25 N1me Phone Address Comments CUSTOMER ROUTING Drvision of Building & Planning Division of Building & Planning / ~ r rti +r ti., tiyyr rrr r r ~ L L r ` Jl ~y R1~OING SCCfiott NN*~ S00dva""', Addressing ~ Admin. Exception ~ Approach Permit Building Permit s Arterial Rd Plan Info : Flood Plain Permit ~ Code Information Binding Site Plan Info s Public/Private Roads Commercial Review Cert. of Exemption , Res. Bldg Pcrmit Rev. ~ Conference Comprehensive Plan ~ Site Drainage Info Energy Code Info ~ Cond. Use Permit = Subdivision Review s Fire Safety Review = Nonconfocming Use • : Utility Permit .,l ~ Manufactured Home Permit Review ~ Zone Change Review 31 Mechanical Permits Shorelines lnfo . ~ Other Permits Short Plat Info NO FEE REQUIRED _ ~Reviewer Time out ~ Plumbing Permits = Subdivision Info . ~ Private Road Info Temp. Use Permit re ~ Residential Review ~ Vanance Appl. i APA Payment ' Sewer Permits Zone Check = Cert. of Exemption F Infortnation ~ Zone lnfo ~ Subdivision Review ULID/Sewer Info 00 ~ ne Change Review 2,5 ~ F ~ _ 1 NO FEE REQUIRED ~ NO FEE R6QUIRED Revicwer Tmic out Reviewer Tune out Reviewer 'Time out I I ` ? IASI'[:RU'AS51"ORI CfR 116,30 . , SPOKANE COUN'I'Y HEARING EXAMINER Re: Zone Reclassification from Urban ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, Residential-22 (UR-22) to ) AND DECISION Regional Business (B-3); ) RECEiVED Applicant: Buster Heitman ) File No. ZE-68-96 ) M aY Q 5 1951 Gwql EWUKII& 1. S Y OF PROFOSAL AND DECISION Proposal: To rezone approximately 1.64 acres of land from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) to allow the development of uses which are allowed in the B-3 Zone. Decision: Approval, subject to conditions. II. FINDINGS C)F FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone classirication application and the evidence of record and adopts the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: A. GENERAL INFORMATION: AppGcant: Buster Heitman, Conklin Development 8205 North Division Street Spokane, WA 99208 Property Addrm: Not available Property Loeation: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, west of Carnine Street, and east of Conklin Road, in the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Fange 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Legal Description: Lots 7 through 10 and Lot 12, Block 1 of replat of Block 13 of Vera located in the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. in Spokane County, Washington. Zoning: Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Compreheasive Plan Category: The Comprehensive Plan category for the subject property is Major Commercial. 1 ~ A L Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Building and Planning. The comment period on that DNS ended April 21, 1996. Site Description: The site is level, vacant, and undeveloped. It consists of five lots on the north side of Sprague Avenue. A sixth lot separates one lot from the other four. The sixth lot is currently developed with a commercial building. Surrounding Conditions: North of the site there are single-family homes, but the property is zoned B-2 (Community Business). The property adjacent on both sides and across Sprague Avenue to the south is either developed or being developed with commercial and retail uses. Project Description: The applicant seeks a zone change in order to develop this site for commercial uses. There are a significant number of commercial uses in the area and this rezone would make this site compatible with those developments. No site plan was offered with the application, so no specific proposal is before the Hearing Examiner at this time. The County Division of Building and Planning has recommended approval subject to various conditions as outlined in the Staff Report. B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.402 (Amendments), 14.622 (Urban Residential-22 Zone), and 14.628 (Regional Business Zone). Hearing Date: April 23, 1997 Hearing Location: Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower I.evel, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA. Notices: Mailecl by applicant: April 4, 1997 Posted by applicant: April 4, 1997 Published: April 4, 1997 Site Visit: April 20, 1997 Testimony: Louis Webster Pat Harper Spokane County Building and Spokane County Division of Engineering Planning Department and Roads 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane, WA 99260 2 . Ann Winkler Buster Heitman Inland Pacific Engineering Company 8205 North Division Street 707 West Seventh Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99208 Spokane, WA 99204 C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS: To be approved, the proposed zone reclassification application must comply with the criteria for amending the Official Spokane County Zoning Map, specifically Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section 14.402.020 of the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the requirements established under Washington Case Law for the approval of rezones. The proposal must also satisfy the requirements of the B-3 Zone, and must be consistent with the State Environmental Policy Act and Chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code. The following Findings of Fact and Conclusions are made: 1. The lDronosed zone classification is consistent with the Comnrehensive Plan and imnlements the Goals. Obiectives. and Decision Guidelines of the Maior Commercial cateQOrv for the nrovertv and surroundinQ area. The purpose of the Major Commercial category in the County's Comprehensive Plan is to provide the opportunity for development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers, and commercial uses directly related to major throughways. In this case, several of the sites sunounding this site are zoned B3, and many more are zoned B2 (Community Business). Sprague Avenue is a State Route and also a major throughway through Spokane Valley. B3 zoning is one of the zone classifications intended to implement the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, this proposal is, in fact, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. No testimony or evidence was offered to show any inconsistencies with the Major Commercial category. 2. Conditions in the area in which the vrovertv is located have changed substantiallv since the nrovertv was last zoned. A number of changed conditions were identified in testimony since the property was last zoned. The property was last zoned in 1955 and was rolled over into the UR-22 category in 1991 with the implementation of the County's new zoning code. Since 1955, Sprague Avenue has developed into an intense business corridor and many more businesses have been developed along this street in this area. Further, the County adopted its Comprehensive Plan and designated this property in the major commercial category. The UR-22 zoning does not implement the Major Commercial category and is inconsistent with it. These changes are substantial enough to support this zone change. 3. The uronosed rezone bears a substantial reladon and is not detrimental to the public health. safetv, and Qeneral welfare. 3 This proposed rezone does bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, and general welfare. It increases the commercial uses available in the area for the expanding residential market. This same applicant is building single-family housing developments south of this site, and he also owns two of the other corners of this intersection. He intends to develop all three corners in a common theme and to do so in a way which will provide commercial shopping for the residences nearby. Further, in conjunction with this development a stop light will be installed at the corner of Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. Conklin Road will also be improved to Collector Arterial Standards under the County's Arterial Plan. Also, sewer will be extended from the residential areas down Conklin Road to serve this site which is in the Priority Sewer Service Area. This use on Sprague Avenue will be more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the surrounding area than will be the cunent multi-family zoning. Therefore, this rezone serves the public interest and the general welfare. 4. The vrovosal, as conditioned, is consistent with the B-3 Zone and the Zonine Code. The nronosed zone reclassification will not have a vrobable, sienificant, adverse imnact on the environment. No significant, probable, adverse environmental impacts were identified during the environmental review process for this proposal. There was concern over the impacts from this and other uses on the adjacent intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road, but those impacts will be mitigated by the stop light which will be installed at that intersection. No testimony was presented which would give the Hearing Examiner a basis to alter or modify the Determination of Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning. The applicant has not submitted a site plan for a specific proposal, so it is impossible to determine that a potential use will be consistent with the requirements of the zone and the zoning code. However, Staff will be in a position to review any building permit applications to insure that all requirements of the B-3 zone are met. M. DECISION Based on the Findings and Conclusions above, it is the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve the above zone reclassification subject to the following conditions: SPOKANE COUN'TY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLA,NNING CONDITIONS 1. Any development proposal for the site shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended. 2. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve 4 as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of propecty legally described as [ J is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner or Administrative Official on imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County DivisioD of Building and Planning. 3. Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond, or other suitable guarantee, for the project prior to release of building pernuts. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 6. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All conditions as required by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority must be complied with. SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES Sewer Service: 1. (A Covenant Agreement shall be signed stating:) The Orvner(s) or Successor(s) in iraterest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94. They funher agree not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94. 5 w _ They further agree not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 2. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. A sewer connection permit is required. 3. The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities department "under separate cover," only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. 4. The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit. 5. Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of the public sewer connections and facilities. Water Service: VERA 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Counry Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location, and arrangement of parlcing stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 6 5. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 8. T'he County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Conklin Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 10 - 12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Access to Carnine Street shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections, and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 12. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 13. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvement shall be filed with the County Engineer. 14. The applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: 7 ~ • The owner(s) or successor(s) in interests agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alterative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any Counry participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a results of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue. 15. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal Arterial. the existing right-of-way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, a strip of property ten (10) feet in width along the Sprague Avenue frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Sprague Avenue. • 16. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and the Spokane 8 S ti County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County right-of- way per Spokane County Standards. 18. The applicant has previously submitted a traffic analysis for the intersections affected by this proposal. Based upon information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by the applicant at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates, a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue, also has the responsibility to construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in the study, warrants are now being met at this intersection. If any final plats are done it will be the developer's responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone, adequate surety shall be provided to insure the construction of the signalization. SPOx:ANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be provided by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. ~ 4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. DATED this 2nd day of May, 1997 ~ (3-r'eg Smith/ Spokane County Hearing Examiner Pro Tem 9 - ~ ~ h N-OTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TD APPEAL Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.090 and Spulcane Caunty Resolutian Nvs. 96-0632 and 96= 0171, the decision of the Hearing Exarniner regarding the abvve zone Teclassification applicatian and SEPA determination is final and canclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days fx'om the issuance of the Examiner's decision a person with st.anding files an appe.al with the Bvard of Caunty Cammissioners of Sgokane County, Washington. Hnwever, RCW 36.70B.110(9) indicates that administxative appeals of land use d+e.cisions shail be filed within fourtmn (14) catendar days of the date of the decisian. I]epending on which aPIeal Periad is applicabIe, the appeal ciosing date is May 12, 1997, or May 16, 1997. APPeal procedures are otherwise set forth in County Resalution Nvs. 96-0632 and 96- 0171, and include the payment of .an appeal fee of $225 as well as paying for px{oduction of a =nscript and copies of the official record. The Board will hold a clQSed record hean'ng. Fvliowing the clased record hearing, the Baard may affrm, reverse, modify, ar rema.nd t.he matter to the Hearing Examiner. Priar to appeal, the cnmplete project file, includi.ng this decision, 'rs available for review at the offj'ce of the Spokane Caunty Hearing Examiner. Capies of the file and electronic record'mg of the puhlic-hearing condueted by the Hearing Examiner will be made available at the cost provided by County resolution or vrdinance. The office hvurs of the Spnkane Caunty Hearing Examiner are generall}r Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:0(} a, rn. and 4: 30 p. rn. Fo11owing anY aPPeal, the recard will be filed with the Boaard of County Cornmissioners and rna}r be inspecied at such affice during normal business hours. 10 . ~ . . . " ZE~ 68 ~ • • ~ - _ _ .~.,,sr' ` - ~ - oti s ~ . v- : ~ BRIDGE J ~ . Nt4506 ~ ~ • . ` ♦ a' ~ I ~T • +~ai.~.Lrtir•~ • . r ` O • ~ • ~ ` r gROAD E. ~}Q . •Y Firc ~ogrc's'~ S}ation s - h oo ~ 'S~Ct r~a ° Q ~ 1 > ( ~ ] . : - . ~ V s+. i L E~T ~ ~ ~ 4 N r ►-t~~ H z A, Av . z ~ cc - 5 PRAC-A1E /tY E u v f};y> ; U , c ~r - , _ - y 1f1.S~• _ r. '.r ~+i .~~~.r-~~.~ f . - • . T * A L E rf.ST P ~P RR GO. ~ ~ n- - - ~ - ~ -G ' - - - - . c : - . ~ "y a' H av ~ Z a T N~; ~ w . I K i op . ~ ~ ~ BR'o~~ £LLEY N• 4so 9 ~ T` ~~"~y ~~nfiro~: a I I'ey: ,LtGAX \ r ~ ~ • ~ ~.f~i'~~t~ ~ ~ .~c~ ` 'j:. _ . I ~ FwI G Av E ; X 8 TH cfl v , •''l,•~I~ ~ o. 0.0 Q ~ W T N ~ F~rT ' 11 T}I a V~ i ~ ~ W~ tJ ~ = o Vicini ty Niap ~ . ~ . , (D . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ L015 7 THOUCH 10 ANO LOT 12, BLOp( 1 OF REPUT OF BLOCK 13 Of VERA AS PER PUT RECARDEO IN 40LUYE X OF PU15, PACE 27 ~ SPONS.ER BUSTER HEIrMAN CONKUN DEVELOPYENT SITE DA TA N 8205 DIVISION 5?OKANE, WA 99208 (509) 467-2113 E)aS11NC ZONE UR-22 PRaPOSED 2014E 8-3 ~ I MCINTY MAP I--------~--------~-- I ^'-----i--------f------------------~ I ~ L-------- L RIVFRSIDE AVE. ~ I I T- T I I - - - - - - - - ~ T--------1 ( ~ I ~ I 0 ~ I I ( I I p(o I i i ~ ~ I I ~ i i I I I q G f`~ °cr- l 6 ; 5 QS 4 i ,i ~ 2 i ' ~►I i i i z ~ ,c-5 L I 103.24' 106,00' 10s.00' - - - - - - - - - - - to5.oo' t o s. ar f «WHIC SCOU ~ I 50 50 i, 7 ~ 8 ~ 9 ~ 10 y ~ ~ ~ 12 ( NFM~ , ~ ~ I I 1 ridh - OG R I ~ I I ~ I I 105.00' , L _ I I i ----------L- SPRAGUE A4EMUE t '~'~EIVED ~ - r ~ S~J~CP,NE COUNTY - ZONE RECLASSIF'ICATION ~ OF ~ 10 a LOTS 7 THROUGH 10 AND LOT 12 , HLOCK 1 ~ p OF REPLAT OF BLOCK 13 OF VERA ~E~tra LOCATED IN THE 30UTHEAST 1/4 OF '°""wt •SUM I°° 4°°-U° W °'2" 5EC'PION 13, T.25 N,, R.44 E., W.M. % DIUISION OF BUILDINO AND pIANNING SPOKANE COUNTY, R ,q .OF RECORD ~t . , - . ~ • _ ~ .~~---tT-----,~-~ _ _ ~ w 1 90 ~ . ~ r~ ~-r+• pj! 4,50 6 . ► y. ; ~ p ~ 1 , st a0~" 0 ~1► ~ ~ Y • ~ ~ r C t . 5}ation . c5~ = a ° a . _ ~ _ 1 horo' 5;~:~CGt a ti ~ p,,,~ , - 1, . , r 7 '„~,At A'4 W _ ` r S j.,. . ~ { • ~ w ~ ~ ~ SpRA►~E ~ P P R R G~' ~ ~ s T ~s ' _ t ~ lU'~ a z N ~ g F2 AC- 0 9 O C _.o AX . ~ ~ st•' qO i . • . 6,'.,, ' Q ~ ~ . ~ , t ~ ~nir4! `'i,~~~•_ ~ ~ vo~ . I ~ E~ _ `G~~ , - ` ~G`,`~N~.. 10T-4 ~ c ..,,,.r• ' ~j . t1i ~ T W ~ 2 ~ , , F~ . . ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1015 7 THOUCH 10 AND LOT 12. BLOa( 1 OF REPLAT OF BLOpC 13 Of' VERA AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUIIE X OF PLATI, PACE 27 SP0NSFR BUSTER HEITIAAN CONKUN 6EVELOPUENT s~tE ~aTA N 6205 OIVfSIqv SPOKANE, wA 94208 EXISTING ZONE UR-22 (Sa9) 467-2123 PR6?OSED ZONE B-3 i I 41CimTY MtAP I L-------- ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1------- 4---------1---------~ ~ RIYEnDE AVE. ~ ~ ~ -r--------~- _ ' ~ ------T--------~ --~►L p,~ i (d w~ , ► I° 1 5 ~ 5 Q~ f i.) Y i I Y zl z mi . ~ ~ i ~ 1w.24' ios.oo' I oaoo' tos.oo' 1os.ooar ' "I aWHIc sCA.E I ~ i eo eo i190 w • V 7 9 V 10 u '4 12 j i cIN FEET> i S4 1L I ~ I I 1 I ~ 1 I ~ L----------1-------- i SpftAGUE AYr?NUE ZONE RECLASS'Il~'ICATION OF IATS 7 THROUGH 10 AND IAT 12 , BIACK 1 ~ PACRc OF REPIAT OF BIACK 18 OF VERA LOCATID IlN THE S0UTBEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, T.25 N., R.44 E., W.M. ~ ~7 Vimt 7th.~e 200 456-45W ~ `~an~ 0M 4920/ FAfc. (6)9) "1,r~~'t~~fl~ 1 w FFl?iTor* SPOKANE COUNTY ` 0 F F~G0 rD i 7 ' ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 1 November 6, 1996 ' W.O. No. 96206 Pat Harper Spokane County Engineering Department W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Threshold Traffic Study for Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Sprague Dear Pat: Based upon our project understanding through conversations with you and the sponsor, we have prepared a brief traffic threshold determination for this proj ect. This threshold study has been requested as a part of a rezone application of the property. The parcel is presently zoned UR-22, Urban Residential-22 units per acre and the rezone request is for B-3, Regional Business. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION 1. INTRODUCTION At the present time, there has not been a site plan prepared for this rezone application, however, a general vicinity map, Figure 1, is attached and Figure 2 shows the parcels. Uses for this site will be consistent with those allowed in a B-3 zoning category. Based upon the site configuration, and zoning proposed, the land use which was assumed for the purposes of this traffic threshold study for the parcels being rezoned is some sort of a strip mall, or series of small shops. This proposed highest and best use is what the traffic study will assume for the site. Other usages are possible but do not represent higher traffic generators.. This site is located on the north side of Sprague Avenue between Conklin Road and Steen Road. Directly to the east of this site is Carnine Road, an unimproved county right of way. The surrounding area along Sprague Avenue currently enjoys B-3 zoning classification. Property north of Sprague, and north of this site is zoned B-2, and that which is further north of Sprague is zoned UR-3.5. The zone reclassification for this property will enable a mix of retail, business or office uses on this site and will implement the Comprehensive Plan for land uses along Sprague Avenue. The existing zoning in the surrounding area is shown on Figure 3 which is attached. RFC-FIVED NOV 1 2 1996 A SPOKANE. I,UUNTY EPlGiNEER 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Dnve • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX 208-769-7277 , Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Sprague Traffic Threshold Study November 8, 1996 ' Page 2 The rezone which is being requested is for a series of lots which front on Sprague Avenue. In this block, there aze six lots. One of these lots is presently in use as a pawn shop, and is not a part of this rezone. Of the five lots which are included in this rezone application, one lies to the east and four are west of the pawn shop. They are presently used informally either as overflow storage for the pawn shop or for vehicles which are for sale by their owners. At this time the build out of u,ses on these parcels is not known. Therefore, the analysis will look at one year, five yeaz and ten year build out scenarios. Access to this site will be by driveway directly to Sprague and may also include a driveway to Conklin as a secondary access point, and will be analyzed as such. H. EXISTING CONDITIONS Sprague Avenue is the only street which was scoped to be analyzed for this project. Impacts from the rezone, if any, will be analyzed at the following intersections: • Sprague & Sullivan • Sprague & Conklin Sprague Avenue, a four-lane, two-way, east-west principal arterial through the Spokane Va11ey with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Land uses throughout it's length are primarily commercial in nature. In the vicinity of the site, Sprague has two lanes in each direction with a non-standard (4-6 foot) center median strip and is bordered with both large and small businesses. Conklin Road is a two-lane, two-way, north-south local access street which runs from 4th Avenue south of this site to Broadway north of Sprague. It is posted at 25 mph. Sullivan Road is a north-south, two-way principal arterial west of this site. North of Sprague Avenue it is a seven lane facility, and south of Sprague it is a four lane facility. It is posted for a 35 mph speed limit. ' . Accident summaries were obtained from the Spokane County Engineerulg Department for the two intersections in the study area. Table 1 summarizes the information obtained. Both intersections have accident rates well below the 2.00 accidents per million entering vehicle threshold at which a safety situation can be identified at an intersection for conection. ' ' Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Sprague Traffic Threshold Study November 8, 1996 Page 3 ' Table 1- Accident History in Study Area 1993-1995 ACCIDENT STATISTICS Intersection 1993 1994 1995 Per PDO .INJ PDO INJ PDO INJ MEV Sullivan & S ra ue 3 4 16 4 8 6 0.83 Conklin & Sprague 1 1 3 3 0 1 0.34 PDO - Property Damage Only INJ - Injury Accident III. EXISTING CONDITION - Levels of Service (per HC1lI) Traffic counts had been taken at Sprague & Sullivan during April 1996 during the AM peak hour. Traffic counts for the PM peak hour were callected at this intersection during May, 1996 by County forces. Traffic counts at Sprague & Conklin were taken in 1994 and updated to match the counts at Sprague and Sullivan The existing levels of service at the intersection of Sprague & Sullivan were calculated using the Synchro Signal Coordination Computer Program which is based on the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. The unsignalized intersection of Sprague & Conklin was analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software. A summary of the existing levels of service at the subject intersections are shown in the following table. The traffic volumes used for this report are shown on Figures 4& 5, Existing AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes which are attached. 1 Table 2- Existing Level of Service EXISTING CONIDITIONS INTERSECTION ~ (S)ignatized AM PM (U)nsignali2ed DELAY LOS DELAY LOS ' Sprague & Sullivan S 20.7 sec C 27.0 sec D Sprague & Conklin U 13.2 sec C 120.5 sec F ~ ~ ~ U Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Sprague Traffic Threshold Study November 8, 1996 ~ Page 4 Both iatersection.s axe presently functioning at LOS C during the AM peak hour. Sprague & Sullivan ~ is also workiiig at LOS C during the PM peak hour. Sprague & Conklin is presently working at LOS ~ F in tbe PM peak bour. Due to this' fact, a warrant analysis was conducted, and it was discovered that this intersection meets warrants for a traffic signal. It does not, however, nleet either Warrant ~ • 1 or 2. ~ A condition on the nearby Shelley Lake residential development plat states that at the corupletion of 101 homes in this development, that a signal would be requi.red at this intersection. A similar ~ condition was also pue on a recently completed rezone of a pazcel bordering on the east side of Camine Road, di.rectty east of the property for which- this traffic threshold study has been prepared. Spokane County also lias a TTB'project scheduled to improve Sprague Avenue by wideni.ng to install i` left turn treatment in the middle of it, however, instal ling a traffic signal at this location is not part T- of this project Since the Shelley L'ake development is moving forwardy and the intersection is now functianing at LOS F and meets signal warrants, this intersection was assumed to be signalized ~ before the completion of the HeiUnan rezone at Sprague & Conklin. Based upon the cond.itions whiGh were written for the recently completed rezone just to the east of this location, it is clear that ~ the County would like to have this signal installed concurrently with their project to vviden Sprague. = ~ II! BACKGROUND PRQ.IECTS ~ The SheUey Lake residential project, the traffi c from the recently rezoned piece directly east of this proposal and the traffic from the additious at the Good Sam retirement home were identified for ~ inclusion in this traiMc study as contributing traffic to the Vansportation system. Therefore, traffic volumes, as shown for phase 1 in the DEIS prepared for Shelley Lake were added to the existing h traffic volumes for the one year build out sceaario. The Shelley Lalce development was assumed to be built out for the five and ten year scenarios. The site generated trip figures from the Shelley Lake DEIS are attached to this report, and follow the other figures. The tra.ffic from the recently rezoned ~ i; site directly east of this was included from the traffic study prepared for it. The addition at Good ~ Sam seems to meet the land use category of Attached Elderly Care. This project is -assurned to be build over a five year period, and to have about 65% of it's traffic come to/from the west. Also a . non site specific traf-fic growth factor of 2.5% per year compounded for the one, five and 10-j►ears that this project rnay take ta complete was added to the existing volumes to predict the future traffic i + volumes. ~ V. TRIP GEIVERATION , ' The existing Zoning for this parcel is UR-22 and rezoning this property to B-3 is requested at this time. Although it is usual to put some sort of housing units in a UR-22 zone; based upon the ~ location, it is more likely that a land use such as an office building would be eonstrueted at this _ location. Although the focus of this iraflic study is more on the differences between no development and development under a B-3 use, a use such as a medicaUdental office, or walk in bank could be ~ put on this site under the existing zoning. ~ ~ ~ u ~ Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Spragve Traffic Threshold Study November 8, 1996 Page 5 The B-3 - Regional Business zone has many land uses pennitted under it which will generate traffic at different rates. I-iowever, since ultimate plans for this site are not defined at this time, this site was examined at it most likely use and therefore, the "Specialty Retail (814)" category from the Trip Generation Marrual, Sth Edition was used as the trip generator for this site. Many other land uses are possibte for this site, however, this land use is fairly i.ntense and is apprapriate for the configuration of the site. Based upon requirements in Spokane County, approximately 25% of raw land available within an industrial or cominercial development will be converted into square footage for the building on the site. Therefore, the 1.65 acres which compcise this proposal can support 18,000 square fe.-It of bui iding area. ✓ Table 3- Trip Generatian - Heitman Rezone - Conklin & Sprague Site AM Peak Hour PiV1[ Peak Hour KSF Vol. @ Directional Vof. @ I?irectiomAl 6.41 tirips Distribution 4.93 trips Distribution per KSF a'r A r per KSF # ' o o~ 63 /o Yn 37 /o Out 40% In 50 /o Out 18 115 72 43 89 ' i 45 ~ 44 Averape Daily T& Ends (A.DT) KSF Rate Tt►tikX A,DT 18 40.67 732 KSF - Thousand Square Feet V1. TRIA DISTRIBUlJON (simplified gravity model) , For this analysis, it was assumed that the traffic generated by tlus commercial site would ingress and egress from the site approxi.inately 50% to/from the east and 50% to/from the west during the peak hours. In part this distribution is based upon the directional distribution at Sprague & Conklin, but also it is based upon the area from which this commercial site vvill draw. Residential development is primarily located east and south (west) of this site. Traffic volumes, based on this distribution, for the peak hours are shown on Figures 6& 7. Although driveway locations are not known at the present time, a schematic of the trip distribution from the site is shown. ~ Heitman Rezone at Conklin & S ra ue Traf~ic Threshold Stud P g Y November 8, 1996 Page 6 This strip mall or series of small shops will carry items which may compete with other sinular locations in the surrounding area, and is expected to draw from basically the same population of valley residents. These residents live south of Mission Avenue, west of Henry Road and east of Evergreen. Motorists who access th.is site from other parts of the valley, or other parts of Spokane or Spokane County, would not be new trips, but rather should be considered "pass-by" trips and are already on the transportation system. Some of the residents within the primary service area may also be "pass-by" trips. YII. FUTURE CONDITION with/witho:it PROJECT - Level of Service This commercial site may be completed within one, five or ten years. Therefore, the background traffic was compounded at the 2.5% rate as explained previously in this report for the year, five year or ten year condition during whicb ttus project may be completed. The traffic from Phase I of Shelley Lake, the previously rezoned pazcel directly to the east and the addition to Good Sam was also added. The levels of service expected for these intersections with the increases expected over the next year, in five years and in ten years without the additional traffic from the Heitman Carnine commercial site are shown on the following table. The traffic volumes which the tevels of service in the table are based on, are shown on the Figures which are after the report. Tablc 4- Levels of Service Wit6out the Heitman Rezone at Sprague & Conklin Site BUUILD OIJ'I' YE AR BACKGROUIVD TRAFFIC INTERSECTIO1V (S)ignaiized AM PM (t)nsignafized DELAY LOS DELAY LOS ~ Sprague & Sullivan S 21.6 sec C 31.0 sec D 1997 Sprague 8i Conklin S 3.0 sec A 4.4 sec A , Sprague & Sullivan S 24.6 sec C 37.6 sec D 2001 Sprague & Conklin S 6.0 sec B 4.9 sec A „ Sprague & Sullivan S 28.3 sec D 58.5 sec E 2006 Sprague & Gonklin S 6.2 sec B 6.6 sec B Table 4 shows the changes in level of service to be expected at these two intersections in the future without the additional traffic from the Heitman Rezone at Sprague & Conklin in operation. Note that the intersecrion of Sprague & Conklin is operating at high levels of service as a signalized Heitman Rezone at Conklin & Sprague Traffic Threshold Study November 8, 1996 ' Page 7 intersection. Note also that the intersecrion of Sprague & Sullivan during the PM peak hour will be working at LOS D until sometime between 2001 and 2006, at which time it wi11 fall to LOS E. During the AM peak hour, this intersection will fall from LOS C to LOS D between 2001 and 2006. Level of service E is below acceptable standards for a signalized intersection in Spokane County. In order to create a condition under vvhich this intersection will function at acceptable levels of service, a couple of options are available to the County. The first option is allowing permittedlgrotected phasing for some or all af the approaches. The other is widening and providing dedicated right turning lanes, and/or multiple left turning lanes. If permitted/protected phasing is implemented during the PM peak hour at this intersection for south, east and west bound traffic, it will function at LOS D with 38.6 seconds of delay under this condition. If permitted/protected phasing is not an option the County waaes to pursue at this location, widening will be necessary to accommodate the amount of traffic which is projected to pass through this intersection. There is no condition under which adding one lane will provide enough capacity for this intersection to work at level of service D. Two laaes will have to be added. One conlbination which will provide an acceptable level of service is adding an eastbound right turn lane and a northbound right turn lane. With these tvvo lanes in place, the intecsection will function at LOS D with 38.6 seconds of delay, tlie same as is projected for the permitted/protected phasing option. Adding the traffic anticipated to be generated by this proposal to the traffic anticipated in 1997, 2001 and 2006 indicates that the levels of service will be as shown on Table 5. The traffic volumes which are expected under these conditions are shown on the Figures which follow. Table 5- Levels of Service with the Heitman ltezone at Sprague & Conklin Site BUILD OUT '~EA►~Z TRA~'FIC VYITH PR4JECT I IN~'ERSECT~~I~ (s)iguafina AM PNi (U)nsignaiized DELAY LOS DELAY LOS Sprague & Sullivan S 22.0 sec C 31.6 sec D 1997 Sprague & Conklin S 3.2 sec A 4.8 sec A y 1 ~ Sprague & Sullivan S 24.6 sec C 38.9 sec D 2001 ' . ~ . : Sprague & Conklin S 6.2 sec B 5.4 sec B Sprague & Sullivan S 29.6 sec D 40.0 sec D 2006 Sprague & Conklin S 6.4 sec B 8.7 sec B i ' ' Heitrnan Rezone at Conkl'ul & SPrague Traffic Threshald Study NovemUer 8, 1996 Page S No claanges in level of service are expected with the addition of the Heitman rezone at Sprague & Conlclin. Hawever, if the improvements suga sted above at Sprague & Sullivan are not axnplemented before 2006; the level of service dtuiag the PM peak hotu will be LOS E. This ~ intersectioxi during the PM peak bour in 2006 was assumed lo have perm.ittecUprotected phasing in place. The intersection of Conldin & Sprague wi_U fa.il further into level of service F until a sigria1 is installed here. Ti77I C011fCL USIONS From the dat.a callecfed for fi.his threshold determijlatioza, -vve concltide tl.zat ttie developmenfi o.f tlae Keitman rezone at Spxague & Conkl.in will not i.i.npact either the intersecrions of Sprague & Sullivan or Sprague & Coaki.i.n and ttiat it Sprague & Conldin is signalized, both of tlzese intersections wiJl bc f~unctioni.ng at acceptable levels of service exceQt that before 2006, ilse intersection of Spzague & Sullivan during the PM peak uouY• will d.rop to LOS E. If the i.utersection of Sprague & Con.lclin is not signaaized before the completion of this site, tUas i.ntersection will continLte to function at LOS F. and as traff'ic increases, delay wil I also inerzase. .lX PIZOPOSEfD .MITIGATIOfV The addition af the I-leitrnau rezone at Sprague & Conklin is not anticipated to have an.y i.n.ipacts to the inte-rseciions of Sprague & Sulhvan or Sprague & Conl:li,n. However, ttle int4rseetion of Sprague & Con.lcli.n, sulce it is presently funGtioning afi T,OS r, and presently meets wariants iot• a ta•,lffi c signal wiil require signalizafiion. This rezone will tierive a Uenefit by having this intersection be signalizeti. Tbe signalization at this intersection cou.ld be cooxdinated with the Counfiy project for widen,ing Sprague. It is fuxther recommended that if the proposal has not been completed in .~ive ~ ' ' Heitman Rezone at Conklin & S ra ue Tr~c Threshold Stud P g Y November 8, 1996 ' Page 9 years, and it becomes necessary for the traffic study to be updated, that a closer look at Sprague & Sullivan be taken at that time to determine when and if this intersection is still projected to function at LOS E. ' After review of this threshold determination please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, ' Inland Pacific Engineering Co. ' Ann L. Winkler, P.E. ' ALW/alw , encl. cc: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders ' John Pederson, S okane Coun Plannin P tY g Mark Rohwer, WSDOT Planning file ' ~ ' ~ ~ • _ ~ ~ ~ - INO IPARK E ST ~ menurY EUCLIO AVE L~ ~ EUCLID a~'^ ¢ QE CD D~ ~ oa n¢ W • ~ v~i = uJ J ~ FAIRVIEW LN EUCUO ~ ~~f ~y ; h zf ~ _ \ Q J 7 - ~ x~ ~VE Q MARIE?TA a ~ W J y N ' ¢ Z O = = Z W O J ` G O EP.~ AVE \ 9p fi°c~ INDIANA ~ G ~ i $HANNON AVE Y W J INDIANA AVE q` _ INDIANA _ ~ ~ F BALDWIN NaRA AVE 70 F ~0qq ~ ! o pD T _ MISSION =p1 H ~ uAxweu ~ M/S$1ON - ~ ~ ! Vallc ¢ ITO ;l' ..o~ Medtea 0o Center ~SINTOSHARP ~ SINT a 0 w Q~'~ ~ MAWELL BOONE ~ SH P a NAVEa ~ q V , e X BOO NE, _ E~ a ~ ~ BOONE a Q o01vE ~ ~ z3_ fl DESMET Q O OESMET DESMET a ¢cr ~ Q ' CATALDO = E >~T Y W ~ o=ATALDO AVE / y r.~ ' PR O J E C T ,AjALDOq ~ ~Ei W W~ a ~T N Elem e j m m= MALl6Nl Mo~ j u A l O N LOCATION BROAOWAY . AVE m ► o OADWAY i K t SoqINGFIELD AVE Q ~ W SPRIHGAElO AVE ` ~ SPRI4GFIELJ ~ ;~w~sQW"' Z~ ~ ' w t ALKI AVE CT ' Progress ' rl ALKI ~ ALKI ~ ~ ' Elem o~ 0 ¢ ALKI AIKI o'- - -a, ¢ UVE~ o~ OLIYE = W W ouvE Q Q ~ O ~ z o O ¢ ~ m W VALLEY Q O s r pc ~ z VALLEY WAY W> ~ WAY ¢ LEY WAY I m -J a Z < w r NIXON = - - ~ NIXON iIXON ~ i ` ttixo» N c 0 p ZLAw IAYE NAfN m m m ~ m~ w Q ! " J c~ ' W T_ __~_o ~z 3a MAIN m 4AIN oC > MAIN yAI MAIN c ~ Z U ~RIYEASIDE f R~~,y~p~.5'10E J Z Q • RIVERStOE ~ u u1~ ~ RIYEflSt9E Z E ~ = RI ERSIUE O ~ m SPRAGUE ~ a AVE N a ~ Greenecres u Jr H S ~ w12ND 15T ¢ 2N0 m ¢ ( ¢ ta'~M o p c ~ 3RD 3RD AVE , W x 2N0 2ND ND W ~ aROaKU+ ) AVC • N DW , m]RD o4TH AVE 7CT ~ ~ ¢ ~ s ITM AVE o ~ ~ op 41TM ~Kcystone STH AVE ~ STH F ~ gT►{ u ¢ SiH N m ITN t STM N Elem STH m H u u 6T ;T~Q~_! _`TN = 6TH AVE m Q A 6TN a 6TH x! c q° 71H AVE ~ ¢ Q < <^I 7TH Q CT p = W r Adams ol >I g 8TH ~ AVE ~°c m1 ~ 9 Elem WI x z o~ W z ~-I wl ' CenUal Valle t 6TN AVE Q J~ Q`_ Zi 9TN . AVE~~ cl ~ 9TH L9TH MS r ' _ 0, ¢ tOTN _ AVE I~ w ~ IOTN 9TM CT 4 m~ Q'', ~ aa ~ 9TH m tOTH c.~ OTH aYdw tort~ ~ «E i1TM AVE IcJi ~ 3 V M tiTM J Q ' , ° ~ 11TH AVE ~ i 12TH AVE ' tu 12TNO ~TN ~z Un --i ¢ w~S , 1 QY ~ 137H W ~p DR AVE " W Nr 13TN L~ ~ t3iH AVE ' ~TH + i~LH, o; 14TM AVE ~ o m t° ~ z 13' N a ~O Yr o, C7 m W .....~oi4tN 11TH iSTH AVE 0 3 McDonald t~rH ~.AVE 15TH 4lEvlrgrsenQ Q _ iSTM Elem r AVE j ~ 16TH AVE ¢ ~ } a~C m~ z u 16TH AVE ~ I ¢ Z ~ ~ Q 17TH ~ 1oTH AVE p~ OQ, 17TH 17TM PVE ~ ~N ' LQ i*= ~ i ~v . 2 x ¢ o ~herN AVE 4r~r 2 187N ? m Y. OP ~ f A SAl m wz ri ~ 90\~~ F YF 2 W y P N 19TNlN IAVE QQa ? P a ~ W F r~( pS F, a 810 > 4 AVE l,~oo SSFI g o Z `a' ~J~@" Q i zatrt B4qp •n ~ 1 ° 9~ 9'tc N ' O T M \Sf,~~RU f 20TH A' M UNN y ~i,P ~orH Q ~~S a u> 40Ti ~ C 99F~ ~ 9VE ~ 21ST 4- 21ST 21ST AVEs ~ ' 2151 ~ ~ Gly9 ~ 9?H~ ~ uao~.►i nSunrise rnm T Q~ AVE ~ W r~sr 21St ~ P"'q AVE 3 °C Elem 2214 Q 7CT Z ~ 22N 7 7 R D l t M O cQ 0]RD AVE Y W CT R m ~ cr :4Ta~1YITH AV 24TH AVE 0 25T cj 29TH AVE 25TH ~ AVE ~ ~Fzsni 25TH " ~426TH u I._aYF e ~ 26TH ~ AVE °m 26TH i o z ~ TH,~ 6 2CT ~ c,yFio m 127TH AVE ~ H A ~ ~ ~ 7TN Z ~ 28TH~AV 9~ ~F 28TH AVE ~ < CMER C',~~'9<9 ~ NOT TO SCALE **41, ~ I NLAND FIGURE 1 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERINC VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX' (509) 458-6844~ \ PROJECT N0. 96206 0/ ~ ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION , LOTS 7 THOUCH 10 M10 l0T 12. BL,OCK 1 OF REPLAT Of' BLOpC 13 Of VERA AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUTAE X OF PLATS, PAGE 27 SPONSER , BUSTER HEIIIAAN CONKUN OEVELOPIAENT SITE DASA- N. 8205 DIVISION SPpKANE, WA 99208 EX1S11NG ZONE UR-22 (509) 467-2123 PRaPOSED ZONE B-3 1 ~-----------~-------~-------------~--^--------F---------1-----~-.,.~~J i I I ~ L RJVER50E AVE. ---------r-------~- c-~------T--------i---------T--------1 i i i~`~ o~ &I 6 i 5 3 Wj ~ i Zi IC5 . i 103.24' ~ 105100' ~ 105.00' ~ 105.00' 4----------~ tOS.00' V! ~J I , ~ ( I w ~ V r ~ 7 g L g ~ 10 12 j i I i I ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1 io~.es Ics,W ---------L , SPRAGUE AVQNUE , ' ' i NOT TO SCALE \ f , I NLAND FlGURE 2 4~~ HEITMAN REZONE PACIFIC CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING S1TE PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ ~ \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844of ~ ~ •-,,o v ~ _ - - _ . . , , B_ 2 UR-3. - ~ • , B-2 ~ ~ ~ ~Sr,o~ 8-2 ~ B-I < ORiDGE p N* 4 S C` 6 ~ t Bw3 . ~.V►i • ,0 ~`4 I clod ~ ROA D AY' fav - ~ . 22 ~ ;_o9rP,, n ta Or1 1 . h~7V 1 Q UR=15 ~ r 0 5 s ~ az_'.Q VaRR015 ~ ~ A.I- L E- _ A w3S t A -2 + PROJECT r ' UKG23.e5 LOGATION ~ B' r,A ~ . M AV, ~ ~ N ~UR:22-~ ` B-2 B-2 B_Z - rj, 3 PRAGUE Rua e- U 7`1 Pa_ ~ B-3 _ 83 I . ~ a ~a,~ m N g-3 , " m 1 -2 ' B ~ ~ - ' - ~ • ~y_ _ " , B 2 - f~ ~ " - - - rUR-2Z UR-7g, B ' 2 r i+~ U R • 2 2 ~ < < uR _7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o - - URw3,v5 -Z ~ - ' • I ~ r~ . ~ j -22 ~iFLf E~Y-i 0 9 ~ W ` 1,AKE,' ' cr p ~ '-f?i, ~ f i e I'~d , • , - ~ ol F tGN, N ANE . 24 , • _ . , , "'~--r-~-, - y-- ~ ~ e r H . G v. N ~ • ~f~f~' ~ i J : cr \ N INLAND FlGURE 3 HEITMAN REZONE PACIFIC CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING ZONING M AP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 ` \ Spokcne, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844, \ ~ ' ' , ' ' ~ ~NO~i Lr-~ Q Q 183~ ~87 4J' ~13 O O Q 258 33 -=4> G-26 ~ 493 cJ G- 532 W EL LLJ O~ ~i V~ ~r ~ ? a4p a4p J Z ~ Z a°'oo ~ N Y Z Q n ~ O ~ ~ U U J ' J V) PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ NOT TO SCALE I NLAND FIGURE 4 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC E XI STI N G CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENCINEERING A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ 7P7okane, West WA 7th • 99204 suite 200 FAX 509 (509) (458~ 4586840-6844/ S ` TRAFFI C VOLU M ES PROJECT N0. 96206 0/ , 1 ~ ~ ca r (D D Mc~N NO~ 405 ~ ~123 22 r ~12 O O ~ 620 ~ G=.569 1122 C=-890 ix Ctf O 218 Y ~276 12 ~ 36 Z W _j Z Z ~ ~ ~ tn r~ ~ Y Z Q ~ ~ 0 U J J ~ ~ /SPRAGUE AVENUE PROJECT SITE ~ ~ ~ ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ J ♦ ~ INLAND FIGURE 5 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC EXISTiNG CONKUN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERtNG P.M. PEAK HOUR 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844J ` TR AFFI C VOLU MES PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q 9 ~ 0 O O 16 ~ GS0 27 =J G~25 ~ ~ 4P ~ Z W J Z Z r~ cv Ln Y Z Z Q Qf J 0U V ' :D ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ . ~ PROEC S ' ' 25 29 7 7 V ~ 16-1~> ~ <4 l6t> 13 17 r~ 4 4 1 Ati Ok *Ar Lo~ i NOT TO SCALE INLAND FlGURE 6 HEITMAN REZONE \ PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENCINEERING SI TE GENER ATED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAY (509) 458-6844~ ` TR AFFI C VOLU M ES ~ ' ~ N N ~ 2 6/~ Q Q ~ Q 14 =J C-6 16 -=J a 30 x ~ ~ Z W -j Z Z ~ N N Y Z ~ 0 Q J U U ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ PROU~ ~ t ~ C~g 14 18 4 4 4 ' l6t> 13. 18 4 4 k ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND FIGURE 7 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC P. M. PE AK H OU R CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING SI TE GEN ER ATED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844, ~ TR AFFI C VOLU M ES / ~ l ~ ~ ~ rn~~ CD ~ \94 ~ Q Q 188 ~ 4 ~ t3 O O Q 2559 9 ~ 80 34 563 ~ G'~ 51 8 ~ ~ ~v 4=1 N Z O z w J 4 ~ - Q o ~ rn ~ Y Z > 0 U U J J ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE , ' , ~ NOT TO SCALE I NLAND FIGURE 8 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENQINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1RAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7th •Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 T PROJECT ~ PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844, WITHOU \ ' ~ ON ' i 1 L ~ v V \ ~ Olooo ~ 4/ r~ V t71~ N ~ O - 415 ~ ~139 22/ ~12 O O ~J =525e3 21265'~ C.999q/ ' ~ 0 G,3 5 667 G O 223 ~ ~334 ~ 12 ~ ~37 Z W -j z Z 0)~ o N°p ~ y Z Q M N O Q Cif J ~ ' D ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ r ~ ~ ' ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND FIGURE 9 HEITMAN REZONE \ PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 1997 TR AFFI C VOLU M ES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7tn • sutte 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX. (509) 458-6844;e ` WITHOUT PROJECT J\ J ~ n10 o ao ONN 188/ ~97 13 ~13 O O 275 C- 344 590 ~J a 593 of of O 59 ~ e185 3~ Sf'13 Z W ~ ~~p p J Z ~ Z rn c'Ov N `r°) Y Z Q ~N O Q ~ U U _1 J ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ , , ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE / ~ INLAND FIGURE 10 HEITMAN REZONE \ in c PACIFIC A. M. PEAK H OU R CONKUN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ Spoticane, WA 99204 FAx (509) 458-6844~ ` WITH PROJECT / ` PROJECT N0. 96206 J 1 ~ ' Otr) N M~N d~ n n n ~f v v ~ 0 415 ~ ~141 ~ ~ Q Q ~ 681 -=C> G- 531 28 12 Q O O 9 Lr ~ 223 -z7 e=338 128 12 1 ~ G~~O Z W J z Z N ° Z Z ~ U J J ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ' , ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND FIGURE 11 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 1997 TR AFFI C VOLU M ES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6844 PROJECT N0. 96206 ~Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844, ~ WITH PROJECT ~ ' NM.~- ~N~ 207/ ~~180 5 J, ~14 p O 0 285 G~ 356 669 ~ G- 634 X ~ ~ 66 ~ ~204 3 ~ ~13 Z W a~~ a4~ J Z z o~~ x z` > r- oo cv p Q ,J U U J D ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ J / INLAND \ r FIGURE 12 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLlN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2001 TR AFFI C VOLU M ES 707 west 7tt, • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX. (509) 458-6844* ` V1/1THOUT PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ , ' ' ' tD N tD -t M ~ ~ ~ `~G~ 458 ~ 203 24 ~ ~ 14 734 ~ 574 1482 ~3 ~ 1095 ~ 0-1 O 247 ~ ~3i3 13 ~ 41 Z W w J Z ' Z r. c~ (a oLn ao Y Z Q ° ~ N r `n Z ~ >~U U ~ V) ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ 1 ' . 1 ' ' ~ ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND \ ~ FIGURE 13 HEITMAN REZONE ~ ' PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CONKUN AND SPRAGUE ENQINEERINQ 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844! ` WI TH 0 U T P R 0 J E C T J` J , ' ' ~M O N~~ NCN~ Q Q , 207 ~ t\~3 183 14 t\~-3 - 14 O O 0 301 ~J a 366 696 ~ <~-649 W ~ O 66 ~ e209 3~ ~15 Z W w J Z ' Z o° n o(vo Lr' ~ z Z Q r oo C•, p Q ~ U U J J D v) PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ 00/ INLAND FIGURE 14 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2001 TR AFFI C VOLU M ES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844J ` WI TH P R OJE C T / 1 ' ' 0~0 N U~A Ma0t7 ~N~ a ' 458~ ~ 205 30 %,14 Q O ~ 748 =C> G=~580 1498==J a 1105 cy- O 247 ~ ~368 14 ~ ~44 Z W w a4 P it4 ~ D Z I Z NN° oro Y z N p Q Cif ~ U U J J ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ' - ' ~ ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE 10 ~ INLAND 1 ~ FIGURE 15 HEITMAN REZONE PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2001 TR AFFI C VOLU M ES 707 West 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ Spokone, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844' ` WI TH PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ / \ 1 , ~U-)~ d- 00 rn O ~ CV r~ ~ NN ~ ~ Q Q 234 ~ ~ 193 5 16 O O 0 ~~.7b J Z Z LLJ z ~ aQ 37)LSPRAGUE ~ ~228 744 ~143 W ~ J Z ~ Q N ~ 0 U U J ' ~ PROJECT SITE AVENUE ~ 1 1 ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND FIGURE 16 HEITMAN REZONE 1 PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKUN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7tn • suice 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844~ \ WITHOUT PROJECT / ' n ca n ~ v ~iri co O~ e~~~ °a a 518 aR 221 28 j- ~16 p O 0~1~ 827 ~ 7 643 1649 C-1228 X ~ O 279 ~ l~.~ /~47 ~ a4~ a4~ Z Z z Y z Q cv p Q U U 1 ~ ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE I NLAND N, FIGURE 17 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC P. M. P E AK H OU R CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENCINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ 707 west 7tn • sutte 200 (509) 458-6840 WI TH OU T PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96206 ~ Spokone, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844 1 ~ o~o ~ r) ~ NM~ NN.- ~ Q Q ~16 Q 234 ~ ~196 14 $ W ~ Q 335 ~ ~ 409 76 4~JJ 16 ~ ~ J~m233 ~ z w ~~U" J Z Z N ~ oCO ~ Y Z Q ~~N o a ~ U V J J :D Ln PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ ' ' ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ J INLAND FlGURE 18 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TR,e,FFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-68440,f ` WI TH PROJECT J\ J ~ Ih N 00 N d'~fe) 518 ~ ~223 34 ~ ~16 O O 0 841 ~J G-649 1665 ==J a 1238 `Q cr_ O 279 ~ ~ 409 16 50 z W ~ ~ J Z Z o~ ~ r~ ~ Z ~ Q r- ~r cv O Q ~ U V J J ~ PROJECT SITE SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ , ~ ' ~ NOT TO SCALE #4 ' INLAND FIGURE 19 HEITMAN REZONE ~ PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CONKLIN AND SPRAGUE ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96206 \Spokane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844of \ WITH PROJECT / 00 . . / ~ / . . . C~..`'~I-C , T~E , ON ~ 1 ' EXIST I NG LEVELS OF SERVICE 1 ' 1 1 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November ll, 1996 , Volume Worksheet --I' I -I T `l I J► c, I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 183 233 58 160 293 87 89 707 180 99 279 192 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1 05 1.00 1.05 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph ) 197 251 62 172 315 94 96 760 194 106 300 206 Lane Group Flow 197 345 0 172 450 0 96 1001 0 106 315 206 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet I ' I 'r E- Et T ~ L4 'ej . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideal Fiow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 , Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.973 0.969 0.971 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0 950 0.950 , Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.973 0.969 0.971 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553 ' ' ~ Synchro 2 0 Rcport J:ID0CUMENT196206\AM:EX.SY4 Inlaad Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 1 , SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary J, ' Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 197 345 172 450 96 1001 106 315 206 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553 ' Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.18 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.21 0.46 0.10 0.34 0.52 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 309 652 328 708 366 1616 174 1259 811 ' V/C Ratio 0.64 0.53 0.52 0.64 0.26 0 62 0.61 0.25 0.25 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.1 28.2 25.0 28.1 22.5 14.1 295 16.1 7.8 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.0 0.7 1.2 1.3 0.1 0.5 4.3 0.0 0.0 Delay 291 28.8 26.7 27.8 22.6 14.6 33.8 16.1 7.9 LOS D D D D C B D C B ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 , Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 54% Intersection V/C Ratio: 62% Intersection Delay: 20.7 Intersection LOS: C , 1 ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CUMENT1962061AMEX. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary --1' ~ ~ s" H T ~ `l I I 'C' I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 183 233 58 160 293 87 89 707 180 99 279 192 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 197 345 0 172 450 0 96 1001 0 106 315 206 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.64 0.53 0.52 0.64 0.26 0.62 0.61 0.25 0.25 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 29 29 27 28 23 15 34 16 8 Level of Service D D D D C B D C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio- 62% Intersection Delay. 20.7 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN 1 1 JE-1 2 ll 4 13 . 19 15 ~ `=12 `44 W .e Y.y.. . ZO 22 , 134 5 6 F1 8 417 ' ' 1 ' Synchro 2 0 Report J:ID0CUIVENT1962061AMEX. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng; IPEC Page 3 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c AMEX.HCO Page 1 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ' Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE ' Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ALW ' Date of Analysis..... 11/6/96 Other Information.... .....EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 > 2 < 0 0 > 2 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 4 493 3 11 532 13 4 3 29 11 1 15 PHF .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 .85 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s ( o ) S o U /RV's 's E's 1.10 1010 1.10 1.10 1010 1010 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors , Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ' ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c AMEX.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection , Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 292 320 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 985 953 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 985 953 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 584 641 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 833 776 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 833 776 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 0.99 , Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB ' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1241 1236 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 205 206 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 199 200 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1227 1233 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 174 172 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 0.96 ~ Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 166 159 ' ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c AMEX.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 9 5 0 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 6 166 > NB T 4 199 > 501 7.9 0.2 B 7.9 ~ NB R 37 985 > SB L 14 159 > SB T 1 200 > 307 13.2 0.3 C 13.2 SB R 20 953 > EB L 6 776 4.7 0.0 A 0.0 WB L 14 833 4.4 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.6 sec/veh ' 1 ' ~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Volume Worksheet ?J ~ I-z ~ Lrj 1F-I I t-I h, I &1 y, y . : EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph ) 405 620 218 276 469 123 145 358 154 207 696 341 Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1.10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1.05 1 00 1 05 1.00 Adj Flow (vph ) 435 667 234 297 504 132 156 385 166 223 748 367 Lane Group Flow 435 991 0 297 700 0 156 578 0 223 786 367 Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet A W !!j EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0 965 0.972 0,957 0.850 Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950 Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5486 1787 3601 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0 965 0 972 0.957 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm. ) 1787 5446 1787 5486 1787 3601 1787 3762 1599 ' ' Synchro 2 0 Report J\DOCUMENT\96206\PMEX SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN NQVember 11, 1996 Capacity and Level of Serrice Analysis Summary ~ ii 3 .1j, qjJ Lane Group EBL EBT IIVBL VIfBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot 8oth Adj Flow (vph ) 435 991 297 700 156 578 223 786 367 Prot. Satd Fiauv 1787 5446 1787 5486 1787 36{}1 1 787 3762 1599 Perrn. Satd. Flow 1 599 Green Ratia 0.28 0.24 022 0,19 012 0,26 0.14 0 28 0.56 k.ane Grp Cap (vph. ) 496 1331 397 1036 218 920 258 1 045 888 1flC Rativ 088 4.74 075 0.68 0,71 0,63 086 075 0.41 Critica) LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dT 236 23.9 248 25.8 289 226 286 225 75 Prog. Factor 1 00 1M 1 21 106 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 1.00 kncr Delay, d2 11.3 1 B 52 1 2 71 10 171 22 02 Delay 349 255 352 285 359 236 457 24.7 77 L05 D C D D D c E C 6 CYcle Length 90 Lost Tirne• 12 Sum vf Critrcal 1lfS Ratios- 67% Intersectian VIC Ratio 77°!o Intersection Delay 27 0 In#ersec#ian LOS D ' Synchrv 2 0 Report J 1i]C]CLWNI'1962061PMEX SY4 inland .Pacific Engineenng, IFEC P'age 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary L ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph ) 405 620 218 276 469 123 145 358 154 207 696 341 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 435 991 0 297 700 0 156 578 0 223 786 367 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5446 1787 5486 1787 3601 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1787 5446 1787 5486 1787 3601 1787 3762 1599 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ' Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 26 16 28 ' Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 35 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.88 0.74 0 75 0.68 0.71 0.63 0.86 0 75 0.41 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 35 25 35 29 36 24 46 25 8 Level of Service D C D D D C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 77% Intersection Delay: 27.0 , Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , 11 E-12 Ll 4 T 3 28 20 ' 16 26 Y - - 23 114 +f~r 5 ~6 E1 8 ~7 , 1 ' O SSmchro 2.0 Report J.00CtifMENTR962061PMEX SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PMEX.HCO Page 1 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ' Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE ' Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ALW Date of Analysis.......... 11/6/96 Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 > 2 < 0 0 > 2 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 22 1122 12 36 890 12 5 3 45 11 0 12 PHF .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 ' Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s ( o ) SU/RV's CV's PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors ' Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) , Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 ' Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ' , HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PMEX.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ' Step------1-:-RT----from----Minor------Street NB -------------SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 616 490 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 675 782 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 675 782 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.92 0.98 ' ----Step--2-:--LT---from-----Maj---or----Street------------------ WB------------EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1233 980 , Potential Capacity: (pcph) 373 510 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 373 510 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.88 0.95 ' TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.84 0.92 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2270 2270 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 51 51 Capacity Adjustment Factor ' due to Impeding Movements 0.77 0.77 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 39 39 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.92 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2258 2258 ' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 38 38 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.77 0.71 ' Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.82 0.78 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.81 0.71 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 31 27 ' 1 ' HCS: Unsiqnalized Intersections Release 2.1c PMEX.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary ' Avg. 9 5 0 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay ' Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 6 31 > ' NB T 3 39 > 180 30.4 1.4 E 30.4 NB R 54 675 > SB L 13 27 > SB T 0 39 > 54 120.5 1.4 F 120.5 SB R 14 782 > ' EB L 26 510 7.4 0.0 B 0.1 WB L 43 373 10.9 0.3 C 0.4 ' Intersection Delay = 2.3 sec/veh ' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ ~ ' 1997 ' I,EVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT 1 1 1 1 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Volume Worksheet EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL IVBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 188 259 59 180 334 94 91 725 210 113 286 197 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1 05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 202 278 63 194 359 101 98 780 226 122 308 212 Lane Group Flow 202 376 0 194 506 0 98 1056 0 122 323 212 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ . ~1 . T . Li ~ ~ . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.975 0 970 0.968 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Fiow (prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.975 0.970 0.968 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 1 , ' Syncluo 2 0 Report J:IDOCUMENT1962061AMB 1 O SY4 Inland Pacific Englneering, IPEC Page 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Capacity and Level of Service AnalVsis Summary 1 ~ ~1 C, T ~ `i ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 202 376 194 506 98 1056 122 323 212 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.18 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.21 0.46 0.10 0.34 0.52 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 309 653 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811 V/C Ratio 0 65 0.58 0.59 0.71 0.27 0.66 0.70 0.26 0.26 Criticai LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Detay, d1 26.2 28.3 253 28.4 22.5 14.4 29.8 16.1 7.9 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1 02 0.94 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.4 0.9 2.1 2.4 0.1 0.7 8.0 0.0 0.0 Delay 29.6 29.3 27.8 29.1 226 15.1 378 16.1 7.9 LOS D D D D C B D C B Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 58% Intersection V/C Ratio: 67% Intersection Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C ' ' ' Synchro 2 0 Report J 1DOCUMENT196206XAMB 10 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, TPEC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Noveinber 11, 1996 ; , Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary L ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 188 259 59 180 334 94 91 725 210 113 286 197 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 202 376 0 194 506 0 98 1056 0 122 323 212 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ~ Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.65 0.58 0.59 0.71 0.27 0.66 0.70 0 26 0.26 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 30 29 28 29 23 15 38 16 8 Level of Service D D D D C B D C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 67% Intersec#ion Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN . .1' ' i E--1 2 Ll 4 T 13 19 15 12 I' 44 20 I -y 114 I 22 , . 134 ~5 11-16 1*1 I8 1117 ' , , ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CLTMENT1962061AMB 1 O. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Noveinber 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ; ~ 1 114 4 1 cl EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 4 563 3 11 578 13 4 19 31 11 1 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 5 662 4 13 680 15 5 22 36 13 1 19 Lane Group Flow 0 704 0 0 744 0 0 63 0 0 33 0 Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet , ij ~I L4 ~j C-i . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.823 0.822 Ftt Protected 0.999 0.996 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3759 3747 1542 1517 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.823 0.822 Flt Perm. 0.934 0.906 0.992 0.925 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 3511 3398 1536 1430 , ' Synchro 2 0 Report J.ID0CUIVffiNT196206\AMB 10. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineeruig, IPEC Page 4 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --I ~ T 11 ~ Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 704 744 63 33 Prot. Satd. Fiow Perm. Satd. Flow 3511 3398 1536 1430 Green Ratio 0.81 0.81 0.12 0 12 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2848 2756 188 175 V/C Ratio 0.25 0.27 0.34 0.19 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 1.5 1.6 27.5 27.0 ' Prog Factor 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 Delay 1.2 1.6 27.9 27.0 LOS A A D D Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 26% Intersection V/C Ratio: 28% Intersection Delay: 3.0 Intersection LOS: A , ~ , Synchro 2 0 Report J:\D0CUMENTi96206\AMB 10. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Lanesa Volumes, and Timings Summary T ~l ~ ~ c ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 4 563 3 11 578 13 4 19 31 11 1 16 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 704 0 0 744 0 0 63 0 0 33 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3759 3747 1542 1517 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3511 3398 1536 1430 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ' Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 76 76 14 14 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.25 0.27 0.34 0.19 Platoon Factor 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 1 2 28 27 Level of Service A A D D Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 28% Intersection Delay: 3 0 Intersection LOS: A ' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 f; 4 14 76 ' ' 1 ' Synchro 2 0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061AMB 1 O. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 6 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet : I ~ ~ C &I I' e' ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 415 667 223 334 525 139 149 367 201 248 715 350 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 446 717 240 359 565 149 160 395 216 267 769 376 Lane Group Flow 446 1053 0 359 785 0 160 641 0 267 807 376 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet i T 1 --I~.J ~ ~ c~ ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT (dBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#Ihr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.971 0.949 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.971 0.949 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 ' , ' 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J.1DOCiJMEN11962061PMB 1 O. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary ~1 --1 4-' H h~ ~I Li ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 446 1053 359 785 160 641 267 807 376 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 ' Perm. Satd. Flow 1599 Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.12 0.26 0.14 0.28 0.56 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 496 1333 397 1035 218 912 258 1045 888 ' V/C Ratio 0.90 0.79 0.90 0.76 0.73 0.70 1.03 0.77 0.42 Cntical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 24.2 25.9 26.3 28.9 23.1 29.4 22.7 7.6 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 Incr. Delay, d2 13.5 2.3 16.6 2.3 8.0 1.7 53.7 2.5 0.2 Delay 37.3 26.5 46.5 29.7 36.9 24.8 83.1 25.2 7.8 LOS D D E D D C F C B ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 ' Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 72% Intersection V/C Ratio: 83% Interseciion Delay: 31.0 Intersection LOS: D ' , ' 1 1 t Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CLTMENT1962061PMB 10 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ~ Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ~ ~ I ~ C-1 ~I L4 CJ ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 415 667 223 334 525 139 149 367 201 248 715 350 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 446 1053 0 359 785 0 160 641 0 267 807 376 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 26 16 28 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.90 0.79 0.90 0.76 0.73 0.70 1.03 0.77 0 42 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 37 26 47 30 37 25 83 25 8 Level of Service D D E D D C F C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 83% Intersection Delay: 31.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , E-1 2 l4 4 T 3 ' 28 20 16 26 ~ . 23 ~;~x125 114 4-15 417 , 1 ' ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J.\D4CUN[EN1I'1962061PMB 10. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 , Volume Worksheet --t I ~ ~ ~ 4-1 C-1 T ~ 01 `i y C' l EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 22 1265 12 37 999 12 29 8 48 11 0 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 24 1360 13 40 1074 13 31 9 52 12 0 13 Lane Group Flow 0 1467 0 0 1184 0 0 92 0 0 25 0 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet L cj EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grede (°fo) 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.824 0.830 Flt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.983 0.977 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1524 1525 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.824 0.830 Flt Perm. 0.789 0.673 0.954 0.923 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 2965 2527 1479 1441 ~ ' ' , Synchro 2 0 Report J.\D0CUMENT1962061PMB 10. SY4 Inland Pacific Engi.neering, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary C'-1 t . I . ' Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Ad). Flow (vph.) 1467 1184 92 25 Prot. Satd. Flow , Perm. Satd. Flow 2966 2527 1479 1441 Green Ratio 0.83 0.83 0.10 0.10 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2472 2106 148 144 VIC Ratio 0.59 0.56 0 62 0.17 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 1.9 1.8 29.5 28.2 Prog. Factor 1.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 5.4 0.1 Delay 3.9 2.1 34.9 28.2 LOS A A D D ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 56% Intersection V/C Ratio: 60% Intersection Delay: 4.4 tntersection LOS: A ' Synchro 2 0 Report J-1D0CUME1ST1962061PMB 1 O. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 5 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary 'P ~ `l y cj I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 22 1265 12 37 999 12 29 8 48 11 0 12 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1467 0 0 1184 0 0 92 0 0 25 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1524 1525 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2966 2527 1479 1441 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Penn ' Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 78 78 12 12 Yellow Time (s.) 35 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.59 0.56 0.62 0.17 Platoon Factor 1.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 2 35 28 Level of Service A A D D Cycle Length: 90 , Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 60% Intersection Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 4 12 78 ~ ~ ~ ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J.ID0CUMEN11962061PMB 1 O. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, rPEC Page 6 1997 LEVELS UF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ~ ~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ; EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 207 301 66 209 366 183 104 820 251 183 344 217 Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 324 71 225 394 197 112 882 270 197 370 233 Lane Group Flow 223 434 0 225 649 0 112 1209 0 197 388 233 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , --I 7~ C-A 41 T I ~i Ll . ci . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.975 0.954 0.967 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.975 0.954 0.967 0.850 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 ~ ' Synchro 2 0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Novcmber 11, 1996 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary C-- ' C,~ t L4 yCi. Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR , Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 434 225 649 112 1209 197 388 233 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.50 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 270 653 328 813 366 1492 231 1259 776 V/C Ratio 0.83 0.66 0.69 0.80 0.31 0.81 0.85 0.31 0.30 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 28.7 25.8 278 22.7 17.3 28.9 16.4 8.8 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 12.7 1.8 4.0 3.9 0.2 2.5 17.0 0.0 0.1 Delay 40.6 30.4 28.6 27.3 22.9 19.8 46.0 16.5 8.9 LOS E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time- 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 71 % Intersection V/C Ratio: 82% Intersection Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C ' , Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENM96206\AMB5W.SY4 lnland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ y ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ' Volume (vPh.) 207 301 66 209 366 183 104 820 251 183 344 217 Adj. Lane Grp. Voi. 223 434 0 225 649 0 112 1209 0 197 388 233 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ' Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 17 14 20 17 22 41 15 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.83 0.66 0.69 0.80 0.31 0.81 0.85 0.31 0.30 Piatoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s ) 41 30 29 27 23 20 46 16 9 ' Level of Service E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 ~ Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 82% Intersection Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , J~' 1 F 2 I ll d 17 ° 17 " 15 ` - 41 20 ~ 14 j,„ P2 ~ _ -,34 5 7 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMEN1196206kAMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11. 1996 ' Volume Worksheet : T ~ ~ ~ ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 14 696 3 15 649 14 82 5 42 13 2 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 16 819 4 18 764 16 96 6 49 15 2 24 Lane Group Flow 0 881 0 0 838 0 0 151 0 0 41 0 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , ~ tA I T ~ `l y c'I ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#lhr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Parkin #/hr. 9t ) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.856 0 821 Fit Protected 0.999 0.999 0.969 0.982 ' Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1560 1517 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.821 Fit Perm. 0.870 0.841 0.879 0.891 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 3270 3155 1415 1376 ' ' ' ' S}mchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061AMB5 W. SY4 Inland Pacific Englneering, IPEC Page 4 S P RAG U E AV E& C 0 N KL I N November 11. 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Anatysis Summary --I C-1 T y ' Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 881 838 151 41 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 3270 3155 1415 1376 Green Ratio 0 67 0.67 0.27 0.27 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2180 2103 377 367 VIC Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.2 5.2 20.6 18.9 Prog Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 Delay 4.0 5.2 21.0 19.0 LOS A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 38% Intersection V/C Ratio: 40% Intersection Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS: B ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Rcpori J:ID0CUMEN71962061AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 , SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ; ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary L EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR , Volume (vph.) 14 696 3 15 649 14 82 5 42 13 2 20 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 881 0 0 838 0 0 151 0 0 41 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1560 1517 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3270 3155 1415 1376 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ' Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 63 63 27 27 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.11 Platoon Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 5 21 19 ' Level of Service A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 40% Intersection Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN It 2 !;1 4 , 27 63 , ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report JMOCUNffi-I~M962061AMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 6 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet -1' 1 -1 -1 I ~ C--1 ~l Ll y ci ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 415 681 223 338 531 141 149 367 205 252 715 350 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 , Adj. Flow (vph.) 446 732 240 363 571 152 160 395 220 271 769 376 Lane Group Flow 446 1069 0 363 795 0 160 645 0 271 807 376 ' Lane and Saturated Fiow 1Norksheet ~I --1 -11 ~ ~ *1 TI ~ `i I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideat Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0°fo 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.971 0.949 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.971 0.949 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 , Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061PMB 1 W. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineeruig, IPEC Page 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November li, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service AnalVsis Summary ~ I ri F- *1 ' t L4 41 Cil ' Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 446 1069 363 795 160 645 271 807 376 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Perm. Satd. Flow 1599 Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.12 0.26 0.14 0.28 0.56 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 496 1333 397 1035 218 912 258 1045 888 V/C Ratio 0.90 0.80 0.91 0.77 0.73 0.71 1.05 0.77 0.42 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 24.3 25.9 26.3 28.9 23.1 29.5 22.7 7.6 ' Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 13.5 2.6 18.0 2.5 8.0 1.8 59.1 2.5 0.2 Delay 37.3 26.8 47.9 29.9 36.9 24.9 88.6 25.2 7.8 LOS D D E D D C F C 6 Cycie Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 73% Intersection V/C Ratio: 84% Intersection Delay: 31.6 Intersection LOS: D ' ~ 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUN1EN1'1962061PMB 1 W. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ; -t I --I -z Li I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT IVBR S6L SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 415 681 223 338 531 141 149 367 205 252 715 350 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 446 1069 0 363 795 0 160 645 0 271 807 376 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5480 1787 3570 1787 3762 1599 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 26 16 28 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0 90 0.80 0.91 0.77 0.73 0.71 1.05 0.77 0.42 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 37 27 48 30 37 25 89 25 8 Level of Service D D E D D C F C 6 Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green intersection V/C Ratio: 84% Intersection Delay: 31.6 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , 1 F 2 L~ 4 T 3 28 20 16 26 23 25 14 I 128 6 F1 8 7 ' ~l . ~ ~ ~ J ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUIV1EN1N96206\PMB 1 W. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet , o, l T ~ `l I *ij ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 28 1281 12 40 1009 12 29 10 50 11 2 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Fiow (vph.) 30 1377 13 43 1085 13 31 11 54 12 2 15 Lane Group Fiow 0 1492 0 0 1198 0 0 96 0 0 29 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ~ ~ ~ ~ c-- T~ ~I Ll yI cj I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#Jhr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.824 0.830 Flt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.984 0.980 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1525 1530 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.824 0.830 Flt Perm. 0.755 0.663 0.951 0.935 Satd. Flow (perm.) 2838 2489 1474 1460 , ' Synchro 2.0 Report J.ID0CUMEN'I1962061PMB 1 W. SY4 Inland Pac~'ic Engineering, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 , Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 1492 1198 96 29 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 2838 2489 1474 1460 Green Ratio 0.83 0.83 0.10 0.10 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2365 2074 147 146 ' VJC Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.65 0.20 Cntical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 2.0 1.8 29.6 28.2 Prog. Factor 2.04 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.3 6.6 0.1 Delay 4.5 2.1 36.2 28.3 LOS A A D D Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 59% Intersection V/C Ratio- 63% Intersection Delay: 4.8 Intersection LOS: A , ' Synchro 2.0 Report J.ID0CUME1,-T1962061PMB 1 W. SY4 lnland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary -~I --I ,r, H ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL RIBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 28 1281 12 40 1009 12 29 10 50 11 2 14 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1492 0 0 1198 0 0 96 0 0 29 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Pro#.) 3755 3747 1525 1530 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2838 2489 1474 1460 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 78 78 12 12 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.65 0.20 Platoon Factor 2.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 2 36 28 Level of Service A A D D Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0°/fl), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 63% Intersection Delay: 4.8 Intersection LOS. A Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 4 12 ` 78 , , Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CUMENT196206\PMB 1 W. SY4 Inland Paci.fic Engineering, IPEC Page 6 ~ , 2001 ' LEVELS UF SERVICE WITH4UT PRUJECT ' ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 207 285 66 204 356 180 104 820 238 176 344 217 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.10 1 10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 ~ Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 306 71 219 383 194 112 882 256 189 370 233 Lane Group Flow 223 415 0 219 634 0 112 1195 0 189 388 233 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.974 0.954 0.968 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ' Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.974 0.954 0.968 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ' Satd Flow (perm.) 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 1 ' 1 ' Synchro 2 0 Report J:IDOCUMENT1962061AMB50 SY4 Inland Paci£ic EngYneering, IPEC Page 1 ~ ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary ~I --I qv-i Li Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR ' Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 415 219 634 112 1195 189 388 233 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.50 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 270 652 328 813 366 1493 231 1259 776 V/C Ratio 0.83 0.64 0.67 0.78 0.31 0.80 0.82 0.31 0.30 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 28.6 25.7 27.7 22.7 17.2 28.8 16.4 8.8 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 0 95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Incr. Delay, d2 12.7 1.5 3.5 3.4 0.2 2.3 13.5 0.0 0.1 Delay 40.6 30.0 27.9 26.6 22.9 19.5 42.3 16.5 8.9 LOS E D D D C C E C B ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 70% Intersection V/C Ratio: 80% Intersection Delay: 24.1 Intersection LOS: C ' ' ' ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J-\DOCLTMENT1962061AMB50.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timinqs Summary t 'y I ~ ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 207 285 66 204 356 180 104 820 238 176 344 217 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 223 415 0 219 634 0 112 1195 0 189 388 233 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 , Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ' Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Spiit (s.) 17 14 20 17 22 41 15 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.83 0.64 0.67 0.78 0.31 0.80 0.82 0.31 0.30 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 41 30 28 27 23 19 42 16 9 ' Level of Service E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 80% Intersection Delay: 24.1 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , -t 1 C-1 2 t~ 4 T 1:3 , 17 17 15 ` 41 I 20 - [14 1 22 1" 134 f' I 5 1-16 Ei le ~ 7 ' ' ' , S3mchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUN[ENT196206\AMB50.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ; Lq ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 5 669 3 13 634 14 82 3 37 13 2 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Adj. Flow (vph.) 6 787 4 15 746 16 96 4 44 15 2 20 Lane Group Fiow 0 836 0 0 816 0 0 144 0 0 37 0 , Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , , ~ ' -,I, ' 4-' E-~ t-' C, I T . lr*. I A yI . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Parking (#lhr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.859 0.827 Ftt Protected 0 999 0 968 0.980 ' Satd. Flow (prot.) 3759 3747 1564 1525 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.859 0.827 Flt Perm. 0.927 0.873 0.882 0.886 Satd. Flow (perm.) 3484 3275 1425 1378 ' 1 ' Synchro 2.0 Report J 1D0CUMEN'f1962061AMB50.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC PagE 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service AnalVsis SummarV , T ' Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Fiow (vph.) 836 816 144 37 Prot. Satd. Flow ' Perm. Satd. Flow 3484 3275 1425 1378 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.27 0 27 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2323 2183 380 367 V/C Ratio 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.10 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.0 5.1 20.5 18.9 Prog Factor 0.76 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 Delay 3.8 5.1 20.8 18.9 LOS A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 35% Intersection V/C Ratio: 38% Intersection Delay: 6.0 Intersection LOS: B ' , ~ ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J 00CUMEN'I1962061AMB50 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 5 S P RAG U E AV E& C O N KL I N November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary J' ' -I T . ~ . `3 s. tJ . ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT IUBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 5 669 3 13 634 14 82 3 37 13 2 17 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 836 0 0 816 0 0 144 0 0 37 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3759 3747 1564 1525 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3484 3275 1425 1378 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 63 63 27 27 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.10 Platoon Factor 0.76 1.00 1 00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 5 21 19 Level of Service A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 38% Intersection Delay: 6.0 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT' 2 ~ 4 27 63 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report 7:\D0CUMENT196206XAMB50 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 6 , SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet , EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 458 734 247 364 574 203 167 422 226 346 822 386 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 492 789 266 391 617 218 180 454 243 372 884 415 Lane Group Fiow 492 1160 0 391 919 0 180 731 0 372 928 415 Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet .a ' 1-4 _ C--. tJ- L4 y I 'ei . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.964 0.950 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.964 0.950 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Rcport J:ID0CUMENT'196206\PMB50. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULNVAN November l 1, 1996 Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis SummarY ~ ~ ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 492 1160 391 919 180 731 372 928 415 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Perm. Satd. Flow 1599 Green Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.30 0.59 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 518 1254 411 925 214 751 375 1129 943 V/C Ratio 0.95 0 93 0.95 0.99 0.84 0.97 0.99 0.82 0.44 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 28.6 28.8 31.5 32.7 29.8 29.9 24.7 7.5 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 19.9 8.4 23.5 21.4 16.7 19.8 33.5 3.5 0.2 Delay 42.4 32.8 48.0 48.1 44.5 45.1 59.0 24.5 6.6 LOS E D E E E E E C B Cycle Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Criticai V/S Ratios. 86% lntersection V/C Ratio: 97% Intersection Delay: 37.6 Intersection LOS: D ~ ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061PMB50. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November il, 1996 ~ Lanes, Volumes, and Timinqs Summary --T I --I Ti `l 41 c' l EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 458 734 247 364 574 203 167 422 226 346 822 386 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 492 1160 0 391 919 0 180 731 0 372 928 415 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Sptit (s.) 32 26 26 20 15 24 24 33 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.99 0.84 0.97 0.99 0.82 0.44 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 42 33 48 48 44 45 59 25 7 Level of Service E D E E E E E C B Cycle Length- 100 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 97% Intersection Delay: 37.6 intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , I 1 C-1 2 tl 4 T ~3 32 ZO 24 24 M1 st. iW.L.:S - 26 1I26 ,15 33 ~ S s 1+1 s ~ y 7 , ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT196206\PMB50. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Volume Worksheet L4 y *J - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 24 1482 14 41 1095 14 70 5 58 12 0 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Utit. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 26 1594 15 44 1177 15 75 5 62 13 0 15 Lane Group Flow 0 1716 0 0 1298 0 0 142 0 0 28 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet I -I --I I 'r, 4 t- t1 , IJ ~ 4 !J *J . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.841 0 828 Fit Protected 0.999 0.998 0.974 0.977 Satd. Fiow (prot.) 3755 3747 1541 1522 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828 Flt Perm. 0.768 0.662 0.914 0.870 Satd. Flow (perm.) 2887 2486 1446 1355 ' 1 Synchro 2 0 Report J:\D0CUME1,T'196206\PMB50 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --I H T I I ' Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 1716 1298 142 28 Prot. Satd. Flow ' Perrn. Satd. Flow 2887 2486 1446 1355 Green Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.13 0.13 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2310 1989 193 181 ' V/C Ratio 0.74 0.65 0.74 0.15 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 3.4 2.9 28.5 26.2 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 incr. Delay, d2 0.9 0.6 9.2 0.0 Delay 3.8 3.0 33.4 22.3 LOS A A D C ' Cycle Length- 90 Lost Time: 6 ' Sum of Criticat V/S Ratios: 69% Intersection V1C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 4.9 Intersection LOS: A 1 ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J 1D0CUMENT196206\PMB50 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 5 , SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Novelnber 11, 1996 ; ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ --I I r' Ll 4j EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 24 1482 14 41 1095 14 70 5 58 12 0 14 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1716 0 0 1298 0 0 142 0 0 28 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Fiow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1541 1522 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2887 2486 1446 1355 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ' Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 75 75 15 15 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.74 0.65 0.74 0.15 Piatoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 4 3 33 22 Level of Service A A D C Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 4.9 ' Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT12 1%'4 15 75 . ' ' ' 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CLIMEN'T196206\PMB50. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IP'EC Page 6 ' ' 2001 1 IfEVEI,,S OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ; I -I d c, ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 207 301 66 209 366 183 104 820 251 183 344 217 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 324 71 225 394 197 112 882 270 197 370 233 Lane Group Flow 223 434 0 225 649 0 112 1209 0 197 388 233 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , L.LA IJ ci I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.975 0.954 0.967 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.975 0.954 0.967 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 , Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 ' ' ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Repori J:\D0CUMEN1R962061AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary ~I --I r F-1 TI Li $1 C' I ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 434 225 649 112 1209 197 388 233 Proi. Satd. Flow 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.50 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 270 653 328 813 366 1492 231 1259 776 ' V/C Ratio 0.83 0.66 0.69 0.80 0.31 0.81 0.85 0.31 0.30 Cntical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 28.7 25.8 27.8 22.7 17.3 28.9 16.4 8.8 Prog Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 12.7 1.8 4.0 3.9 0.2 2.5 17.0 0.0 0.1 Delay 40.6 30.4 28.6 27.3 22.9 19.8 46.0 16.5 8.9 LOS E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 71 % Intersection V/C Ratio: 82% Intersection Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C ' , ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENI'1962061AMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 207 301 66 209 366 183 104 820 251 183 344 217 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 223 434 0 225 649 0 112 1209 0 197 388 233 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Satd. Fiow (Prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5229 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 17 14 20 17 22 41 15 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 35 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.83 0.66 0.69 0.80 0.31 0.81 0.85 0.31 0.30 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 41 30 29 27 23 20 46 16 9 Level of Service E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 82% Intersection Delay. 24.6 Intersection LOS: C SQ1its and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN 2 l~ 4 T 3 ' 17 17 15 „41 .__20 , --I, .~14 ; ~~22 134 ~ 5 1-16 E'1 18 7 , ' 1 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMEN'I1962061,AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet -21 --1 r*1 `l I I tj I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 14 696 3 15 649 14 82 5 42 13 2 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 16 819 4 18 764 16 96 6 49 15 2 24 Lane Group Flow 0 881 0 0 838 0 0 151 0 0 41 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ~ --I --4j 4- !j- ~ 1 1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.821 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.969 0.982 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1560 1517 FrtPerm. 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.821 Fit Perm. 0.870 0.841 0.879 0.891 Satd. Flow (perm.) 3270 3155 1415 1376 ' ' ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J-ID0CUMENT1962061AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4 ~ , S P RAG U E AV E& C O N KL I N November 11, 1996 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 881 838 151 41 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 3270 3155 1415 1376 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.27 0.27 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2180 2103 377 367 V/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.2 5.2 20.6 18.9 Prog. Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 Delay 4.0 5.2 21.0 19.0 LOS A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 38°!0 Intersection V/C Ratio: 40% Intersection Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS: B 1 ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUME1NM96206\AMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering; IPEC Page 5 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Novcmber 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary 'A I ~ 1 cj I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 14 696 3 15 649 14 82 5 42 13 2 20 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 881 0 0 838 0 0 151 0 0 41 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Fiow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1560 1517 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3270 3155 1415 1376 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Spiit (s.) 63 63 27 27 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.11 Platoon Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 5 21 19 Level of Service A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 40% Intersection Delay. 6.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 ~ 4 27 63 ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J•\D0CUMEN1R962061AMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, rPEC Page 6 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 458 748 247 368 580 205 167 422 230 350 822 386 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 492 804 266 396 624 220 180 454 247 376 884 415 Lane Group Flow 492 1177 0 396 928 0 180 736 0 376 928 415 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , L EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.964 0.950 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.964 0.950 0.850 Fft Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUME1,T1962061PMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 , SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Capacrty and Level of Service Analysis Summary -21 --1 4"1 ~1 I T `i ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 492 1177 396 928 180 736 376 928 415 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Perm. Satd. Flow 1599 Green Ratio 0.29 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.30 0.59 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 518 1254 411 925 214 751 375 1129 943 V/C Ratio 0.95 0.94 0.96 1.00 0.84 0.98 1.00 0.82 0.44 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 28.7 28.9 31.6 32.7 29.8 300 24.7 7.5 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 19.9 9.8 25.8 23.6 16.7 21.0 36.2 3.5 0.2 Delay 42.4 34.2 50.4 50.4 44.5 46.4 61.8 24.5 6.6 LOS E D E E E E F C B Cycle Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 86% Intersection V/C Ratio: 98% Intersection Delay: 38.9 Intersection LOS: D ' ' 1 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Repori J:ID0CUMENT1962061PMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Lanes, Volumes, and Timinqs Summary ~ ~ ~ 1 4- H 'A I T &I `l I cj I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 458 748 247 368 580 205 167 422 230 350 822 386 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 492 1177 0 396 928 0 180 736 0 376 928 415 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5440 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 32 26 26 20 15 24 24 33 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.95 0.94 0.96 1.00 0.84 0.98 1.00 0.82 0.44 Piatoon Factor 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 42 34 50 50 44 46 62 25 7 ' Level of Service E D E E E E F C B Cycle Length: 100 , Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 98% Intersection Delay: 38.9 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , .1' 1 F 2 Ll 4 T 3 32 a{ ~ 20 24 24 ^ . _ ~«y 26 x ,126 - 15 33 415 6 I+1 S 117 ~ ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:IB0CU1vENT196206\PMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 , Volume Worksheet ; L ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 30 1498 14 44 1105 14 70 7 60 12 2 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 32 1611 15 47 1188 15 75 8 65 13 2 17 Lane Group Flow 0 1741 0 0 1314 0 0 148 0 0 32 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet 1 01T~~I Ci~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 , Idea! Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828 Fit Protected 0.999 0.998 0.975 0.980 Satd. Ftow (prot.) 3755 3747 1543 1526 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828 Fl Perm. 0.741 0.653 0.932 0.881 Satd. Flow (perm.) 2785 2452 1474 1372 ~ ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUIV[E1,T1962061PMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --I Ti 4. ' Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 1741 1314 148 32 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 2785 2452 1474 1372 Green Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.13 0.13 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2228 1962 197 183 , V/C Ratio 0.78 0.67 0.75 0.17 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 3.6 2.9 28.6 26.3 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 1.3 0.6 10.1 0.0 Delay 4.4 3.1 34.4 22.4 LOS A A D C ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 , Sum of Critical V!S Ratios: 73% Intersection V/C Ratio: 78% Intersection Delay: 5.4 Intersection LOS: A ' ' ' 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUIVENT1962061PMB5W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 ~ SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary -P I -I --q~ r*1 `i 41 4' ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 30 1498 14 44 1105 14 70 7 60 12 2 16 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1741 0 0 1314 0 0 148 0 0 32 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1543 1526 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2785 2452 1474 1372 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Spiit (s.) 75 75 15 15 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.78 0.67 0.75 0.17 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 4 3 34 22 , Levei of Service A A D C Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 78°k Intersection Delay: 5.4 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & COIdKLIN ITI 2 *--3-~ 4 15 - 75 ' ' ~ ' Synchro 2.0 Report J 1D0CiJMENTW62061PMB5W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 6 ~ 2006 I LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT ' 1 1 i 1 1 1 i ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November il, 1996 Volume Worksheet l E-~ ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 234 319 74 228 399 193 117 925 264 191 385 246 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 343 80 245 429 208 126 995 284 205 414 265 Lane Group Flow 252 465 0 245 700 0 126 1342 0 205 435 265 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet --I -z' rl F-~ ~I zhj T I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0°l0 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0 974 0.955 0.968 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0 950 0.950 ' Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0 974 0.955 0.968 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J-1DOCiTMENT196206\AMB 100 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Pdge 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary 4 s ~ L ~ Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 465 245 700 126 1342 205 435 265 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.17 0.12 0.19 0.14 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.51 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 289 652 328 756 366 1493 231 1259 794 V/C Ratio 0.87 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.34 0.90 0.89 0.35 0.33 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 28.9 26.2 28.9 22.9 18.4 29.1 16.7 8.6 ' Prog. Factor 1 00 1.00 0 96 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 16.5 2.5 6.2 12.5 0.2 5.5 21.5 0.1 0.1 Delay 44.2 31.4 31.2 36.9 23.2 23.9 50.6 16.7 8.7 LOS E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 78% Intersection V/C Ratio: 90% Intersection Delay: 28.3 Intersection LOS: D ' , , Synchro 2.0 Report J 1DOCUMEN'I'196206\AMB 100 SY4 Inland Pactfic Engineering, IPEC Page 2 ~ ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 234 319 74 228 399 193 117 925 264 191 385 246 Adj Lane Grp. Vol. 252 465 0 245 700 0 126 1342 0 205 435 265 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553 Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 18 14 20 16 22 41 15 34 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.87 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.34 0.90 0.89 0.35 0.33 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 44 31 31 37 23 24 51 17 9 Level of Service E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 Offset* 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 90% Intersection Delay 28.3 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , E-12 1l 4 3 18 =16 15 f.x 41 _ z E.,..i . ZO _.r 14 : 122 I --,I34 , ~ 5 1-16 S ? ' , , ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CIJMENT1962061AMB 100. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Volume Worksheet ~ --I ~ I ri ~ ~ ~ ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 5 742 4 14 713 16 82 4 42 14 2 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 6 873 5 16 839 19 96 5 49 16 2 24 Lane Group Flow 0 928 0 0 918 0 0 150 0 0 42 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet -111 --1 E" C, T ~ `i 41 C' . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ideal Flow (vphpi.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.823 Fit Protected 0.999 0.969 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3759 3747 1560 1519 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.823 Fit Perm. 0.913 0.842 0.876 0.886 , Satd. Flow (perm.) 3432 3158 1411 1372 , Synchro 2.0 Report J:IDOCUIVIENT196206kA.MB 100. SY4 lnland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --1 46- Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 928 918 150 42 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 3432 3158 1411 1372 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.27 0.27 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2288 2105 376 366 V/C Ratio 0.41 0.44 0.40 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.2 5.3 206 18.9 Prog Factor 0.75 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 Delay 4.0 54 20.9 19.0 LOS A A C C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 40% Intersection V/C Ratio: 43% Intersection Delay. 6.2 Intersection LOS: B ' Syncluo 2.0 Report J:\D0CUMENT1962061AMB 100 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ' -z ' L cj EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ~ Volume (vph.) 5 742 4 14 713 16 82 4 42 14 2 20 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 928 0 0 918 0 0 150 0 0 42 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3759 3747 1560 1519 Satd Flow (Perm.) 3432 3158 1411 1372 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 63 63 27 27 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.41 0.44 0.40 0.11 Platoon Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 5 21 19 Level of Service A A C C Cycle Length. 90 Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 43% Intersection Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN yT 2 ~ 4 27 63 , ' S}mchro 2 0 Report J:\D0CUME1,T1962061AMB 100. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 6 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 827 279 405 643 221 189 475 249 377 926 437 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 889 300 435 691 238 203 511 268 405 996 470 Lane Group Flow 557 1308 0 435 1022 0 203 817 0 405 1045 470 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet L 4 y I~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#lhr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0 966 0.965 0.951 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.965 0.951 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 ' ' ' ' ~ Synchro 2 0 Report J•1D0CUrME1'-M962061PMB100.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --1 4-' F- cl I T `l 1_ 01 ' Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Fiow (vph.) 557 1308 435 1022 203 817 405 1045 470 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 ' Perm. Satd. Flow 1599 Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.29 0.57 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 500 1308 393 980 232 751 375 1091 911 V/C Ratio 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.04 0.87 1.09 1.08 0.96 0.52 , Criticai LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 28.4 28.9 30.4 31.4 32.4 30.7 30.6 26.5 8.7 ' Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 Incr. Delay, d2 71.4 19.0 72.8 33.8 19.8 53.7 62.0 13.3 0.4 Delay 95.6 43.6 98.7 60.5 47.3 79.8 88.1 358 7.8 LOS F E F F E F F D B ' Cycie Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 95% Intersection V/C Ratio: 108% Intersection Delay: 58.5 Intersection LOS: E ~ ' 1 ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUIv4E1M962061PMB 100. SY4 Inland Pacific EngYneering, IPEC Page 2 ~ ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11. 1996 ~ Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ~ *J ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 827 279 405 643 221 189 475 249 377 926 437 Adj Lane Grp. Vol. 557 1308 0 435 1022 0 203 817 0 405 1045 470 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm ) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ' Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 31 27 25 21 16 24 24 32 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 1.11 1.00 1.11 1.04 0.87 1.09 1.08 0.96 0.52 Platoon Factor 0 85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 96 44 99 61 47 80 88 36 8 Level of Service F E F F E F F D B Cycle Length: 100 ' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 108% Intersection Delay: 58.5 Intersection LOS. E ' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , .1' 1 1 4-12 Ll 4 ~3 ' 31 - 21 24 _ 24 25 ~27 16 1 , - I32 ~ ,`I 5 --16 f7 ~ 1 ' ' Synclvo 2.0 Report J\DOCUMENT'1962061PMB100 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 , Volume Worksheet : EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR , Volume (vPh.) 28 1649 16 47 1228 16 71 5 65 14 0 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1 05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Adj. Flow (vph.) 30 1773 17 51 1320 17 76 5 70 15 0 17 Lane Group Flow 0 1912 0 0 1457 0 0 151 0 0 32 0 ~ Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , 1 Ij ~ ~ 1 4- E'1 19 *1 T 1 `l y c, EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' IdealFlow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grydde 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Parking (#/hr ) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.837 0.828 Flt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.975 0.977 ~ Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1535 1522 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.837 0.828 Flt Perm. 0.729 0.644 0.983 0.826 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 2740 2418 1548 1287 ' ' ~ ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J 1D0CUMENI'\962061PMB 100 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Novembcr il, 1996 , Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --I C-1 T I I ' Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 1912 1457 151 32 Prot. Satd. Flow ' Perm. Satd. Flow 2740 2418 1548 1287 Green Ratio 0.82 0.82 0.11 0.11 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2253 1988 172 143 ' V/C Ratio 0.85 0.73 0.88 0.22 Cntical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 3.6 2.7 29.9 27.7 , Prog. Factor 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 2.3 1.0 25.2 0.1 Delay 5.4 3.3 50.6 23.7 LOS A A E C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 ' Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 80% Intersection V/C Ratio: 85% Intersection Delay 6 6 Intersection LOS: B ~ ' ' , ' , Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT1962061PMB 100 SY4 In1and Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 5 1 S P RAGU E AVE & CO N KLI N Noveinber 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ~ ~ I ~1 4--' 1 T ~ ~ ~ ~ lc-J 1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 28 1649 16 47 1228 16 71 5 65 14 0 16 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1912 0 0 1457 0 0 151 0 0 32 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1535 1522 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2740 2418 1548 1287 Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm 1 Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 77 77 13 13 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.85 0.73 0 88 0 22 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 - Average Delay (s.) 5 3 51 24 Level of Service A A E C Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green intersection V/C Ratio: 85% Intersection Delay: 6.6 Intersection LOS: B 1 Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 %J a t 13 77 1 ' 1 , SSmchro 2.0 Report J 1DOCUMENT1962061PMB 100 SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 6 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996, ' Volume Worksheet , OL `I y I ~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph 518 827 279 405 643 221 189 475 249 377 926 437 1 ) Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1 10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 889 300 435 691 238 203 511 268 405 996 470 Lane Group Fiow 557 1308 0 435 1022 0 203 817 0 405 1045 470 1 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet , .4j- !J-- j `i I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#lhr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.965 0.951 0 850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 , Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.965 0.951 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.182 0.211 0.950 0.154 Satd. Flow (perm.) 342 5452 397 5446 1787 3578 290 3762 1599 ~ ~ ~ S)z►chro 2.0 Report J-\D0CUMENT196206\PMB100M.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary T~ L ' Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Both Both Both Both Prot Prot Both Both Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 1308 435 1022 203 817 405 1045 470 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 , Perm. Satd. Flow 342 5452 397 5446 290 3762 1599 Green Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.40 0.19 0.12 0.23 0.45 0.30 0.57 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 558 1363 451 1035 214 823 415 1129 911 i V/C Ratio 1.00 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.52 Cntical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 28.1 20.4 30.7 33.2 29.2 19.6 25.8 8.7 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 29.0 11.7 24.7 18.9 33.8 22.5 28.3 9.2 0.4 Delay 460 35.5 42.1 45.0 62.0 47.3 45.0 31.2 7.8 LOS E D E E F E E D B , Cycle Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 ' Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios: 87% Intersection V/C Ratio: 99% Intersection Delay: 38.6 Intersection LOS: D ~ 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMEN'I1962061PMB 100M. SY4 Inland Pacific Enguieering, IPEC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ~ Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary s 1 --1 I !:j 1--_ *1 T EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 827 279 405 643 221 189 475 249 377 926 437 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 557 1308 0 435 1022 0 203 817 0 405 1045 470 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3578 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 342 5452 397 5446 1787 3578 290 3762 1599 Left Tum Type P/P P/P Prot P/P Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 30 28 24 22 15 26 22 33 Yeliow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 35 3.5 V/C Ratio 1.00 0 96 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.52 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 46 36 42 45 62 47 45 31 8 Level of Service E D E E F E E D B Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 99% Intersection Delay: 38.6 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , .9' 1 E- 2 ll 4 T 3 30 22 '22 26 24 , 28 1 -I15 33 S -~s 1*1 _s ~ 7 ' ~ , Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CUMENT196206\PMB100M.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Volume Worksheet -t I --I -Z ' 11 Cil ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 827 279 405 643 221 189 475 249 377 926 437 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Fiow (vph.) 557 889 300 435 691 238 203 511 268 405 996 470 Lane Group Flow 557 978 300 435 1022 0 203 536 268 405 1045 470 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ~ --1 1 4-1 A L4 y . cj . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT IVBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Yes No No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.850 0.965 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5644 1599 1787 5446 1787 3762 1599 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.965 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5644 1599 1787 5446 1787 3762 1599 1787 3762 1599 ' ' Syncluo 2.0 Report J.1DOCUMENM96206\PMB 100M SY4 Tnland Pacific Engineering, 1PEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ` Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary ~ ~I C, I U `i ~ Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Both Both Both Both Prot Prot Both Both Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 1325 440 1032 203 822 410 1045 470 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 , Perm. Satd. Fiow 342 5452 397 5446 290 3762 1599 Green Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.40 0.19 0.12 0.23 0.45 0.30 0.57 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 558 1363 451 1035 214 822 415 1129 911 V!C Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.52 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 28.2 20.6 30.7 33.2 29.2 19.9 25.8 8.7 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 29.0 13.5 27.0 20.9 33.8 24.1 31.0 9.2 0.4 Delay 46.0 37.5 44.5 47.1 62.0 49.0 47.9 31.2 7.8 LOS E D E E F E E D B Cycle Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 88% Intersection V/C Ratio: 100% Intersection Delay: 40.0 Intersection LOS: D ~ ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CUMEN'I1962061PMB10W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, Il'EC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary -t I &I `i ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 841 279 409 649 223 189 475 253 381 926 437 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 557 1325 0 440 1032 0 203 822 0 410 1045 470 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3574 9 787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 342 5452 397 5446 1787 3574 290 3762 1599 Left Tum Type P/P P/P Prot P/P Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 30 28 24 22 15 26 22 33 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.52 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 46 37 45 47 62 49 48 31 8 Levei of Service E D E E F E E D B Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0(0°r6), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 100% Intersection Delay: 40.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN , I 1 F- 2 L~ 4 T 3 30 22 f_ 22 26 24 1,`.128 I 15 I, 133 ~ ~5 1-46 ~'1 8 fl7 ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CUME1"-'I196206\PMB10W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 2006 LEVELS UF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Noveniber 11, 1996 Volume Worksheet s ' --I ' &I `l lej I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 234 335 74 233 409 196 117 925 277 198 385 246 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 360 80 251 440 211 126 995 298 213 414 265 Lane Group Flow 252 484 0 251 716 0 126 1357 0 213 435 265 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet rl EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.975 0.956 0.967 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5240 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Frt Perm. 0.975 0.956 0.967 0.850 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5240 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 ' Synchro 2 0 Report J:IDOCITMEN'T196206\AMBIOW SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1 ' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service AnalVsis Summary L4 ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 484 251 716 126 1357 213 435 265 Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5344 1736 5240 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 ~ Perm. Satd. Flow 1553 Green Ratio 0.17 0.12 0.19 0.14 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.51 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 289 653 328 757 366 1492 231 1259 794 V/C Ratio 0.87 0.74 0.77 0.95 0.34 0.91 0.92 0.35 0 33 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 29.0 26.3 29.0 22.9 18.5 29.3 16.7 8.6 Prog. Factor 1 00 1 00 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Incr. Delay, d2 16.5 3.1 7.0 15.1 0.2 6.2 27.1 0.1 0.1 Delay 44.2 32.1 32.1 39.6 23.2 24.8 56.3 167 8.7 LOS E D D D C C E C 6 ' Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 79% Intersection V/C Ratio: 91% Intersection Delay: 29.6 Intersection LOS: D ' ' ' ' 1 1 , Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUlVE1',11962061AMBl0W SY4 Inland Pacific EngYncering, IPEC Page 2 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Novcmber 11, 1996 ' Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ; ~ ~ C-- I Z *1 T ~ L4 ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 234 335 74 233 409 196 117 925 277 198 385 246 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 252 484 0 251 716 0 126 1357 0 213 435 265 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1736 5344 1736 5240 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 1736 5344 1736 5240 1736 3533 1736 3654 1553 Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot ' Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 18 14 20 16 22 41 15 34 Yeilow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ' V/C Ratio 0.87 0.74 0.77 0.95 0.34 0.91 0.92 0.35 0.33 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 44 32 32 40 23 25 56 17 9 Level of Service E D D D C C E C B Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V!C Ratio: 91% Intersection Delay: 29.6 Intersection LOS: D ' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN 4-12 Lq 4 T 1:3 18 16 15 41 20 114 I 22 ~ 134 5 s y 7 ' ' ' ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:W0CUMENI'1962061AM1310W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, II'EC Page 3 1 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet -a, I wr-l c--' _ T ~ Ll y I c, ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 14 769 4 16 728 16 82 6 47 14 2 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Adj. Flow (vph.) 16 905 5 19 856 19 96 7 55 16 2 27 Lane Group Flow 0 972 0 0 939 0 0 158 0 0 45 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet 1-~ ~ ~ 'r C-- t-I `4 y CJ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.853 0.819 Flt Protected 0.999 0.999 0.970 0.983 ' Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1557 1515 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.853 0.819 Flt Perm. 0.843 0.813 0.876 0.887 ' Satd. Flow (perm.) 3169 3050 1446 1367 , 1 ' Synchro 2.0 Report J 1D0CUMENT1962061AMB10W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4 ' S P RAG U E AV E& C O N KL I N November 11, 1996, ' Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary T' , Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 972 939 158 45 Prot. Satd. Flow Perm. Satd. Flow 3169 3050 1406 1367 Green Ratio 0.67 0.67 0 27 0.27 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2113 2033 375 365 ' V/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.42 0.12 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 5.5 20.7 19.0 , Prog. Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 Delay 4.2 5.6 21.2 19.0 LOS A B C C , Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 ' Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 42% Intersection V/C Ratio: 45% Intersection Delay: 6.4 Intersection LOS: B 1 ' ' ' ~ Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUN1E1M962061AMB 10 W. SY4 Inland Pacif c Engineering, IPEC Page 5 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 , Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary -J'~ ~ ~1 A- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ' Volume (vPh.) 14 769 4 16 728 16 82 6 47 14 2 23 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 972 0 0 939 0 0 158 0 0 45 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1557 1515 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3169 3050 1406 1367 Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm ' Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 63 63 27 27 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.42 0.12 Platoon Factor 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 4 6 21 19 Level of Service A B C C Cycle Length: 90 ' Offset: 14 (16%), Referenced to phase 4-EB-WB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 45% Intersection Delay: 6.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 ~4 27 +63 , ' 1 ' Synchro 2.0 Report J:\D0CLTMENT1962061AMB10W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 6 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 , Volume Worksheet I L *j y ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 841 279 409 649 223 189 475 253 381 926 437 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 904 300 440 698 240 203 511 272 410 996 470 Lane Group Flow 557 1325 0 440 1032 0 203 822 0 410 1045 470 ' Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet -t -I *-A '~I j*i T ~ `4 41 cjl EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#lhr.) Frt Protected 0.966 0.965 0.950 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.966 0.965 0.950 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.182 0.211 0.950 0.154 Satd. Flow (peRn.) 342 5452 397 5446 1787 3574 290 3762 1599 ~ ' ' ' Synchro 2 0 Repori J•\D0CtTME1,T196206\PMB10W SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenug, IPEC Page 1 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 ' Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary ~ ~ ~ ~1 *1 T A " fj~ ' Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? Both Both Both Both Prot Prot Both Both Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 557 1325 440 1032 203 822 410 1045 470 Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 ' Perm. Satd. Flow 342 5452 397 5446 290 3762 1599 Green Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.40 0.19 0.12 0.23 0.45 0 30 0.57 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 558 1363 451 1035 214 822 415 1129 911 V/C Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.52 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 28.2 20.6 30.7 33.2 29.2 19.9 25.8 8.7 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 29.0 13.5 27.0 20.9 33.8 241 31.0 9.2 0.4 Delay 46.0 37.5 44.5 47.1 62.0 49.0 47.9 31.2 7.8 LOS E D E E F E E D B ' Cycle Length: 100 Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 88% Intersection V/C Ratio: 100% Intersection Delay: 40.0 Intersec#ion LOS: D ' ~ ~ , Synchro 2.0 Report J.ID0CUMENT196206\PMB 10 W. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2 SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN November 11, 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR IVBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 518 841 279 409 649 223 189 475 253 381 926 437 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 557 1325 0 440 1032 0 203 822 0 410 1045 470 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ' Satd. Flow (Prot.) 1787 5452 1787 5446 1787 3574 1787 3762 1599 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 342 5452 397 5446 1787 3574 290 3762 1599 Left Tum Type P/P P/P Prot P/P Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7 Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes Current Split (s.) 30 28 24 22 15 26 22 33 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 1.00 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.52 Piatoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 46 37 45 47 62 49 48 31 8 , Level of Service E D E E F E E D B Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 100% Intersection Delay: 40.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAIV , -t 1 E- 2 L4 4 'r 3 30 22 ( 22 26 24 1 128 1 P5 ~ 133 -r'I 5 1-16 E'1 8 1117 ' ' r Synchro 2 0 Report J•1U0CUME1sT196206\PMB10W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3 S PRAG U E AVE & CON KL I N November 11, 1996 ' Volume Worksheet ; -t I --I ~ 1-1 r~1 Lq I I ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT MBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 34 1665 16 50 1238 16 71 7 67 14 2 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph.) 37 1790 17 54 1331 17 76 8 72 15 2 19 Lane Group Flow 0 1936 0 0 1472 0 0 156 0 0 36 0 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet -t -I C-1 I ij *J I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.838 0.829 Fit Protected 0.999 0.998 0.976 0.980 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1539 1528 Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.838 0.829 Fit Perm 0.703 0.635 0.913 0.836 Satd. Flow (perm.) 2642 2384 1439 1304 1 Synchro 2.0 Report J 1DOCUMENT196206\PMBI0W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4 ' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11, 1996 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary --I T 41 Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm Adj. Flow (vph.) 1936 1472 156 36 Prot. Satd. Flow Perrm. Satd. Flow 2642 2384 1439 1304 Green Ratio 0.82 0.82 0.11 0.11 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2172 1960 160 145 V/C Ratio 0.89 0.75 0.98 0.25 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.0 28 30.3 27.8 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 47.6 0.2 Delay 7.1 3.6 73.4 23.8 LOS B A F C Cycle Length: 90 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 84°!0 Intersection V/C Ratio: 90% Intersection Delay: 8.7 Intersec#ion LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report J.ID0CUMENT1962061PMB10W.SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 5 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN November 11. 1996 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary ~ ~ ~ I $'I 'P r3ol `l I . . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 34 1665 16 50 1238 16 71 7 67 14 2 18 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 0 1936 0 0 1472 0 0 156 0 0 36 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3755 3747 1539 1528 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 2642 2384 1439 1304 Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 4 4 2 2 Phase Lagging? Current Split (s.) 77 77 13 13 Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 V/C Ratio 0.89 0.75 0.98 0.25 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 7 4 73 24 Level of Service B A F C Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 90% Intersection Delay: 8.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN IT 2 ±4-1 4 13 77 Synchro 2.0 Report J:ID0CUMENT196206\PNfB l OW. SY4 Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 6 ~ . ~ f i . ~m E E .r....,,,~ ~m.~,~, E ~ s~ E ~ E a I r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C I r ~I Q t E i i TMmn C r fi~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ a 4 . . . . s a i I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. ~ ~ - J I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i \1 ~ ~ _ I ~ ~ I I i - - I I I ~ I ~ ~y I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I I I I i _ I I I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ i i ~ I ~ r--- i ~ I I ~ ~ I I I I ~ I I w P h i } t j . _ Irv. w~~, . ° W " : . m . a z ~ ate."" ~ a°~..,,, a,, .^~a:~•w•a . . ~.a ~ . a" r , ;x ~s„. q k 8' . ~ y ~ X s . ~ ~ x ~~ti . d"..~ t " x ~ R ro K.. m E ~.5 fl. ~ ~ ~t x ..r r . . " .~A »b.. ?g~ P m. g A^..~ E 9 ~.~..u . . , , . . 1 ~:X. a 9 1 { t . . . m i - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - .