ZE-029-96SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM
COMMUNITY BUSINESS (B-2) TO
REGIONAL BUSINESS (B-3)
Applicant: Buster Heitman
File No. ZE-29-96
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS AND
DECISION
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Zone reclassification from Community Business (B-2) to Regional Business (B-3),
on approximately 9.69 acres for those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions.
It. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the evidence
of record and adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions:
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: Buster Heitman, 8205 N. Division, Spokane, WA 99208
Address: Undetermined.
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue and east of Carnine
Road, in the SE 4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
Legal Description: Tract 14 of Vera, according to plat recorded in Book "0" of Plats, Page
30, records of the Spokane County Auditor's Office, Spokane County, Washington; EXCEPT
the North 25.00 feet thereof; ALSO EXCEPTING Right of Way as deeded for Sprague Avenue.
Zoning: Community Business (B-2)
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Major Commercial
category of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is also
within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Environmental Review: The Division of Building and Planning issued a Determination of
NonSignificance on August 30, 1996.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 1
Site Description: The site is approximately nine acres in size, level, vacant and
undeveloped. A preliminary short plat to divide the site into four commercial lots was approved in
May, 1996, in Building and Planning File No. SP-1069-96. The site is bounded by Sprague
Avenue on the north, Carnine Road on the west and Main Avenue on the south. Commercial
property abuts the site to the east.
Surrounding Conditions: Sprague Avenue is identified on the Arterial Road Plan as a Principal
Arterial, with a future right of way width of 130 feet. Carnine Road is an unimproved 20-foot
wide county right of way. Main Avenue is a local access street which extends through to Conklin
Road on the west but will dead-end at the easterly boundary of Armstrong Estates after such plat
has been fully developed. Existing businesses line Sprague Avenue to the west and east. The land
located north of Main Avenue (and Main Avenue extended) in the area is designated within the
Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, while the land situated south of such line is designated
within the Major Commercial category. The final plat of Armstrong Estates (PE-1679-92),
approved in 1994, lies along the north side of Main Avenue across from the site and has been
partially developed with single-family residences. The property west of the site is zoned Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) and Community Business (B-2). Along Riverside Avenue and Main
Avenue to the west, the property is developed with single-family residences, while the land
fronting Sprague Avenue to the west is mostly vacant. The side yards of three single-family
residences border the west side of Carnine Road, directly across from the site. The commercial
property to the east is zoned Regional Business (B-3) and B-2.
The applicant also owns Lots that front the north side of Sprague Avenue, between the site
and Conklin Road to the west. The applicant further owns the parcels located at the southwest
and southeast corners of Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue, and is developing the large Shelley
Lake preliminary plat/planned unit development further to the south. The applicant will be paving
Conklin Road south of Sprague Avenue, and is required to install a traffic signal at Conklin Road
and Sprague Avenue as a condition of the Shelley Lake development. Spokane County plans to
widen Sprague Avenue between Sullivan Road west of the site and Tschirley Road east of the site
in the spring of 1988, as indicated in the County's Six Year Arterial Road Plan.
Project Description: No site plan has been submitted for the proposal, but development of the
site would be subject to the development standards of the proposed Regional Business (B-3)
zone. The applicant indicated that the site was the right size and location for a major retailer such
as ShopKo/Kmart/Fred Meyer, but has not committed to such use. A Large Fred Meyer is located
west of the site, at the northeast corner of Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue. A threshold
traffic study was performed by the applicant for the proposed zone reclassification, which
concluded that development of the site would have no significant impact on neighboring
intersections and proposed no mitigation. The study assumes that the intersection of Conklin
Road and Sprague Avenue will be signalized. The applicant also proposes the extension of public
sewer to the site, most likely by extending a public line from the site along the north side of
Sprague Avenue to Conklin Road, then south across Sprague when such arterial is improved by
the County, then south in Conklin Road to the sewer interceptor.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 2
B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code chapters 14.402 and 14.628.
Hearing Date and Location: September 25, 1996, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: September 5 , 1996 by Elizabeth Larsen
Posted: September 6 , 1996 by Jaryl Weisen
Published: September 6, 1996
Site Visit: September 24, 1996
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution No. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
and Resolution No. 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure).
Testimony:
Louis Webster, Planner II
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Pat Harper
Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Buster Heitman
8205 N. Division
Spokane, WA 99208
Terry Schmike
E. 16712 Valleyway
Veradale, WA 99037
Ann Winkler
W. 707 7th Ave., Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Items Noticed or Incorporated by Reference: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan,
Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Code, Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294.
The Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision in Building and Planning File No. SP-1069-96,
dated May 6, 1996, are incorporated by reference as part of the record.
C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS:
Washington case law generally provides that (1) there is no presumption in favor of a rezone,
(2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions have substantially changed in the area
since the Last zoning of the property, and (3) the rezone proposal must bear a substantial
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 3
relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridse v. Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462
(1978); Bjarnson v. Kitsan County 78 Wn. App. 840 (1995). Case law also indicates that a
county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearing body in making a rezone decision.
Spokane County Zoning Code 14.402.020(1)(2), indicates that consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, detriment to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant
considerations when a site -specific rezone is sought. The rezone proposal must also comply with
the Spokane County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act, the County's Local
Environmental Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations. Conditions may be imposed
to assure the consistency of the proposal with applicable regulations.
The following findings of fact and conclusions are made:
1. The proposed rezone generally conforms with the Spokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan.
A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearing body in making a rezone
decision. Belcher v. Kitsan County, 60 Wn. App. 949, 953 (1991). Deviation from a
comprehensive plan does not necessarily render a rezone illegal, only general conformance is
required. Bassani v. County Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 396 (1993).
The site is designated within the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive PIan.
The Major Commercial (C) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of
commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses
directly related to major throughways. Major Commercial areas typically require a full line of
public services and utilities, including public sewer. The Regional Business (B-3) zoning is tended
to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, including those policies
which encourage commercial development along Principal Arterials or highways and the
establishment of regional -serving commercial uses. Zoning Code 14.628.100. The proposed
rezone clearly implements such policies, since it is located along a Principal Arterial and B-3 uses
are intended for the site.
The Major Commercial category indicates that commercial developments should be buffered
to protect adjacent areas. Goal 6.1, Objective 6.1.a. Only one person spoke in opposition to the
proposal at the public hearing, contending that insufficient infrastructure was in place to support
the rezone. A petition containing the signatures of several owners of single-family property
located north and east of the site was submitted prior to the public hearing in opposition to the
project. Correspondence was also received from the developer of Armstrong Estates and from
several residents in Armstrong Estates requesting mitigating measures by the applicant, including
requests that the applicant (1) dedicate 20 feet of right of way along the frontage of the property
with Carnine Street, (2) install a six-foot high noise barrier fence of cement block along the
frontage of the site with Main Avenue, as well as landscaping between the wall and Main Avenue,
(3) pave and curb Main Avenue between the site and Armstrong Estates, (4) not install any in/out
driveways on Main Avenue or Carnine Road, (5) install landscaping along the east and west
borders of the site. Such correspondence also expressed concerns over potential impacts from the
site on the adjacent single-family areas, including potential changes in traffic patterns, the location
FEE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 4
of businesses with evening hours or of a type that would increase crime or the noise level in the
area, and the location of industrial uses. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions in Building and
Planning File No. SP-1069-96 indicate that similar concerns and requests were expressed
previously by area residents regarding the preliminary short plat application approved for the site
in April, 1996.
Some of the neighborhood's concerns have been addressed in the condition of approval
recommended by commenting public agencies. County Engineering requested that the applicant
add 5-7 feet of asphalt, and install curbing and sidewalk along Main Avenue adjacent to the site.
To prevent the mixing of residential and commercial traffic, County Engineering also requested
that access from the site to Carnine Road or Main Avenue be prohibited, and suggested that
Carnine Road be vacated and used as a utility easement and possible fire access. County
Engineering also requested that the applicant install a traffic signal at Conklin Road and Sprague
Avenue concurrently with the improvement of Sprague Avenue, between Sullivan Road and
Tschirley Road, if a building permit was sought for the site prior to installation of the signal in
conjunction with the Shelley Lake project.
The applicant generally did not oppose the conditions requested by County Engineering, and
expressed a willingness to accommodate the concerns of the residents in Armstrong Estates.
However, the applicant requested flexibility regarding the restriction of access along Main Avenue
and the installation of the requested wall along the north boundary of the site depending on usage
of the site. The applicant testified that a manufactured home sales office/display use might be
located initially on the site, which would tend to have less traffic and impact on the adjacent
single-family areas than other B-3 uses. The applicant also indicated that the commercial uses
allowed under the B-3 and B-2 zones were substantially the same, and that the site would be
developed in an aesthetic and pleasing manner. However, while general retail use is allowed in
both the B-2 and B-3 zones, there are a number of intensive uses that are allowed in the B-3 zone
that are not allowed in the B-2 zone. This includes the uses of automobile/truck painting, repair,
body and fender works; automobile/truck sales; retail building supply; contractor's yard;
hoteUmotel; retail lumberyard; manufactured home sales; large recreational vehicle sales; self-
service storage facility; outdoor theater, truck stop; and warehouse. See Zoning Code
14.623.020. Further, the development standards of the B-3 zone allow somewhat more intensive
commercial development of a site, e.g. maximum building coverage, maximum building height and
signage.
The Comprehensive Plan outlines several techniques for separating or buffering incompatible
uses, including the orientation of structures, spatial separation, landscaping, screening, and
changing density. Major Commercial category, Decision Guidelines 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3; Glossary;
definition of "buffering". The B-1 zone in the Major Commercial category and the Urban
Residential-12 zone in the Urban category are used to buffer low density single-family areas from
adjacent, intensive business uses, if arterial access can be provided. Zoning Code 14.620.100,
14.624.100. The development standards of the B-3 zone to some extent implement the buffering
policies and aesthetic development policies of the Major Commercial category; in provisions
relating to required setbacks, maximum building height, landscaping, maximum building coverage,
parking standards and signage standards. See Zoning Code 14.628. However, such provisions
do not always go far enough to protect adjacent single-family properties from the potential noise,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision
Page 5
odor, aesthetic and traffic impacts generated by many of the intensive commercial uses allowed in
the B-3 zone. The applicant has not submitted a site plan, which makes it difficult for County
staff and the Hearing Examiner to recommend or impose measures to mitigate specific impacts
from intensive uses that might be placed on the site. The Hearing Examiner could approve the
rezone, subject to the submittal of a detailed site plan for review at a future public hearing at such
time as specific development is proposed for the site. See Zoning Code 14.504.040; Spokane
County Code 1.44.050. This is a very time-consuming and expensive process, and should be used
sparingly. The.Hearing Examiner may also require administrative site plan review by the Division
of Building and Planning, with authority to allow the imposition of additional requirements if
needed to mitigate environmental impacts from site development and to ensure compliance with
the standards of the B-3 zone. See County Code 1.44.050 and Zoning Code 14.408.
Under the circumstances, the Hearing Examiner finds it appropriate to require the installation
and maintenance of a six (6)-foot-high concrete, masonry or decorative block wall, solid
Landscaping, or site -obscuring fence along the north boundary of the site, and the Division of
Building and Planning may also require the same along the east boundary of the site where
adjacent to any single-family lot across Carnine Road. The type of screening shall be determined
by the Division of Building and Planning, depending on the use located in proximity to such
boundaries and its potential impacts on adjoining properties. Twenty (20) feet of Type I
landscaping shall also be required between such screening and the property line. If screening is
not required along the west property line, 20 feet of Type I landscaping shall still be required
adjacent to any single-family lot across Canine Road. Access to Canine Road and Main Avenue
shall also be prohibited, as recommended by County Engineering. The development standards of
the B-3 zone shall otherwise be applicable to development of the site. The Division of Building
and Planning always has the authority to place additional conditions on site development where
necessary to mitigate environmental impacts on adjacent properties. The applicant has the right to
request changes to any required conditions through the change of conditions public hearing
process.
With the above added conditions, it can be found that the proposal generally complies with
the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Conditions in the area in which the property is located have changed substantially since the
property was Last zoned.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County
Zoning Code 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a "strong" showing of
change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. County
Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a
comprehensive plan. Bjarnson at 846; Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish County, 99
Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983).
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 6
There is sufficient evidence of change in the area since the adoption of the Zoning Code in
1986, and the cross -over zoning of the site to the B-2 zone in 1991, to justify rezoning the site to
the B-3 zone. Considerable growth has occurred in the Spokane Valley east of Sullivan Road,
particularly south of Sprague Avenue and near Liberty Lake. This growth has augmented the
demand for B-3 uses along Sprague Avenue in the vicinity. Earlier in 1996, the Hearing Examiner
approved B-3 zoning across Sprague Avenue from the site in Building and Planning File No. ZE-
11-96. Sprague Avenue west of Sullivan Road and the Sullivan Road corridor north of Sprague
Avenue are becoming saturated with new commercial development, and commercial growth has
been increasing along Sprague Avenue east of Sullivan Road.
3. The proposed rezone bears a substantial relationship and is not detrimental to the public
health, safety and general welfare.
General consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in determining
whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani at 396-98. As
noted, the proposal generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will provide
regional business services to the growing population in the south Spokane Valley.
4. The proposed zone chance complies with the provisions of the State Environmental Policy
Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance.
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the Determination of
NonSignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning. As conditioned, the proposal
will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment.
5. The proposal as conditioned complies with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, the Spokane
County Zoning Code (SCZC) and applicable land use regulations.
The proposal has been conditioned for compliance with the permitted uses and development
standards of the B-3 zone. Compliance with the B-3 zone and other applicable land use
regulations shall be further determined through the administrative site plan review process. The
Hearing Examiner also finds that the right of way dedications required of the applicant are
roughly proportionate to the impact of the proposal on the County road system.
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings and Conclusion above, the above zone reclassification application is
approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies specified below.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision
Page 7
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive
Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a site development plan
pursuant to Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.408.
3. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve
as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only
be released, in full or in part, by the Spokane County Division of Building Planning. The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action
by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ ],
imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning.
Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing
plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to
the Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond, or other
suitable guarantee, for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest possible
stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by
the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire
apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility,
construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy
code regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to
confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.)
8. A six (6)-foot-high concrete, masonry or decorative block wall, solid landscaping, or site -
obscuring fence shall be provided and maintained along the north boundary of the property;
and such screening shall also be required at the discretion of the Division of Building and
Planning along the west boundary line of the site across Carnine Street from any single-family
lots. The type of such screening shall be determined by the Division of Building and Planning
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 8
based on the type of use located in proximity to such boundary and the impacts generated on
nearby single-family properties. Twenty (20) feet of Type I landscaping shall also be installed
between such screening and the property line. If screening is not required along the west
boundary of the site across Camine Street from any single-family lot, 20 feet of Type I
landscaping shall still be installed along such boundary across from such single-family lot.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and
access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the
County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles
4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of
the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which
purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these
improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue, Main Avenue.
As an altemative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated
herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements.
This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue and Main Avenue.
The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the improvement of
Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the
installation of varying amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
8. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of
Main Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 5-7 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 9
All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
10. Access to Carnine and Main Avenue shall be prohibited until such time as specifically
authorized by the Spokane County Engineer.
11. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable
to this proposal.
12. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
13. No construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior
to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer
to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer.
14. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6", which specifies the
following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual
Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees,
assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County
to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and
to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the
road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District
pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to
cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method
pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of
a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW
36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said
owner(s) and successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction
contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be
derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of
formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is
sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and
successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object
to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in
conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 10
method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the
decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment
roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased
true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any
County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the
improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property
within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation
by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from
the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Main Avenue and
Sprague Avenue.
15. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In
order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the
required right of way dedication, a strip of property 10 feet in width along the Sprague
Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane
County at the time when Arterial' Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
16. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside
future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities
and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible
for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
18. A traffic analysis has been done for this land use proposal. Based on information from the
study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by the applicant at Conklin and Sprague Avenue.
Spokane County will be improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road
beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the signal concurrently with this
construction. The Shelley Lake Estates a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue also has the
responsibility to construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in the study
warrants are now being met at this intersection if any new final plats are done for this plat it
would be the developers responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move
ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone adequate surety shall be provided
to insure the construction of the signalization.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 11
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met (see memos from SCAPCA dated August 29,
1996 and September 4, 1996).
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (ENVIRONMENTAL)
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
5. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each building.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILII ILS
1. A Covenant Agreement shall be signed stating; The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest
agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a
ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the
Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the
owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or
resolution under RCW 36.94.
A wet (live) sewer connection to the area -wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed.
Sewer connection permit is required.
Applicant is required to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement prior to issuance of permit to
connect.
Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate
cover," only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for: Public Sewer
Connections and Facilities for review and approval prior to the finalization of the project
and or the issuance of permit to connect.
Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of Public
Sewer Connections and Facilities prior to the finalization of the project and or the issuance
of the permit to connect to the Public Sewer System.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 12
Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
DATED this 26t,day of October, 1996.
SPOKANE COUNTY H H ARE% EXAMINER
Michael C. Dempsey, WSBA n82.i5
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an application for a change of conditions and associated SEPA determination
is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's written decision, a
party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners
of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9) indicates that administrative
appeals of land use decisions and SEPA'appeals shall be filed with the board of county
commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the decision. Depending on which
appeal period is applicable, the appeal closing date is November 8, 1996 or November 13, 1996.
Appeal procedures are otherwise set forth in County Resolution Nos. 96-0632 and 96-0171,
and include the payment of an appeal fee of $225 as well as paying for production of a transcript and
copies of the official record. The Board will hold a closed record hearing. Following the closed
record hearing, the Board may affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the matter to the Hearing
Examiner.
Prior to appeal, the complete project file, including this decision, is available for review at the
office of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Copies of the file and electronic recording of the
public hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner will be made available at the cost provided by
County resolution or ordinance. The office hours of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner are
generally Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Following any
appeal, the record will be filed with the Board of County Commissioners and may be inspected at
such office during normal business hours.
(This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on October 30, 1996)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 13
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an
application for a change of conditions is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) days from the
issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party of record files an appeal with the Board of County
Commissioners. The Board shall hold a closed record hearing under procedures to be adopted by
the Board. Following the closed record hearing, the Board may affirm, reverse, modify, or remand
the matter to the Hearing Examiner. The date of issuance of the decision is three days after it is
mailed, as provided in chapter 36.70C RCW.
(This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on October 30, 1996)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Page 14
- Zja
I ` FROM:OMN PAk .
1 ~ TO'9Pa58684d JU 8. 1996 11•30AM P.02
. ~
W) rJ
TO THE 64ARD OF COUNTY COMMtSSlONERS
aqJ,ir
APPEAL FEE - $225.00
NAME: Buster Heitman TOOAY'S OATE: 11-8-96
COMPLETE ADORESS: North 8205 pivision Sr.rePr. t Spokane. WA 99208
HOME PHONE: BUSINESS PFtONE:(509)467-2123 ~ r
CA z
APPELLANT'S A7TOFiNEY (if 8pplicebie) N/A
COMPLEYE ADDRESS: N/A
HEARING EXAMINER ACTIpN BE1NG APPEALED:
PRELIMINARY SUBOIVISION NAME
PFiELIMINARY SUBOIVISION NUM6ER
ZONE RECLASSIFiCATION NUM6ER
DATE OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION October 30, 1996
NAME OF HEARlNG EXAMINER Michael C. Dempsev
. ~ ~
SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT ~ ~~.P,~.~ ~
(or authorized toprosontativo) " ~
Fects demonstrating appelfant is party of record and has standing to bring appeal•
Gave testimonv at hearine on this matter.
ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER PIEASE LtST:
1. A separate and concise statement of each error alieged to have been
committed.
2. A concise statement of facts upon which the appollant rol,es to sustain the
statemont of error. .
aTTACN A COPY OF THE HEARING EXaMiNER DECISION.
FOR OFFICE USE ONIY
✓ ✓ ~
Copies to: Hearing Examiner PlanninQ Engineers ✓ Env. liealth
Fee received. Chcck Cash Recoipt Number Iqo
Rcv 9/24/)6
✓
-r- . ~
Mr. Heitman, at the hearing on this matter, gave specific testimony on the screening issue
associated with this parcel with specific reference to the residential areas to the north
immediately across Main Ave. from this site. Mr. Heitman offered to install a wall if the
ultimate usage of site proves to be something along the lines of a large retail box, however, if it
proves to be something with more green areas, such as a mobile home display lot, he would like
the option of installing the Type I landscaping in leu of the wall. Furthermore, the need for both
types of buffering to be used in all conditions was not demonstrated in evidence given at the
hearing.
Therefore, the condition for buffering between the subject property and the residential uses to the
north was agreed to be an either/or condition, not both.
'
,Zg.9
~ ~
ZE .
. %
s . • 0
,
J
~ - ° . ;.r.+~c~:.~• _ ,
i
1
. ,
F-
IY~~~ 9 r 1
~
~ 90 • ~ ,t~ - ATE
45-C6
~ Rp^ ~,,,~•,l ~ ~4
n
= irc.
tatton ,m x
l W,1(~ . _ i I, - •"1
M ~t► ~ N ~ ot
r°
r .i
- ;~'►«..r ~ ' ` ~
w''t" • +j ~ , ~•7~ ' ` 4 -
?M1 J y~' .f~
. ~ t,~ • i~ p
5 ~
~PRAujE p R R G'°'
' r ~e ST~ ~ ~ . v
3 R D
.r. + . a
r u .
~ _ r~- - Z ~ ` a t~I v6
' "J
W
h• `v • C;:s a: • v
,a f'0 9 ;
JELLEY
` AKE
;.v _
: ti ' ~ ~ ~
:1,' •
~t _
.r~:a:~~' • ; . , . _
/
w
AV . d o 127H AVE
~
~ Z
Buster Heitman
~ N
~ -
oc'~F , ' 840t
OR I OG E
" 90 C.
. A1O
N = 4505 ' -
C ' IHTER-S~'A~'E .
aoAo w^y Av E, p Y ~
Or FirG - 13
Station
C '
C o + L
► Q
W 1 '
~ <
Y A ~L L ~ wAY ~ - - : - - -lY
~
• - ~ ~ ~ iz
i U ~
~ t ~
MAIhE • Iltw AV~~
4 Nt I N = N ~ v ~
em~~ r . , " 1
Z4,
~ .
~ AV V ~ r ~ ~ r Z
S PRAGU E
F F~~.~2t~9 ~~13~L.Q44~'► '
~
: `GM.ST. P~P RR GQ
- - _ ~ -=.E0~ ~1--__-_ ~ - _ - : _ - - ,
.
3 Rv
2 ~ ,I
W '
• ui /1 YE
1 8R'OCE v~ ..~~..-"'I.~•.. N L'LLEY N. 4~p 9
;
~:f•i;e~Y~ : ,
• :
I
eTl4
. . . ~
~
'1-% av ~ .
~
:
12TH AVE A,
~ ] ~v E
~
~
. ~ rS P O K,X N E O U N T Y
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNTNC • A DNi510N OF THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
L. M:;NSN, C.I3 C) , Sco77, P E., D►ttEc7-op
MFMORANDUM
TU: Spokane County Division of Engineering; I'at I-Iar-per
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County I-Iealth District; Steve l-iolderbN,
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning; 'l-ur11 Davis
SPokane County Air Pollution Control Aiithority
Fire Protection Disirict No. 1
Central Valley School District No. 356
Vera Water & Power
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Review and comments for below listed files for the hearirlg of September 25, 1996
I'lease review and return any comments for the folIowing files by September 11, 1996. If
yoti have any comments regarding roads and circulation in your response, please forward that
resronse also to the Spokane County Engineer's Office. PleASe forward your comments to ~
the attention of the assigned planner.
1. PE-1797-96
Valleyway Adclition
Existing UR-3. 5
Sec. 13-25-44
Spansor: "I'rout Creek Limited
Assigned Planner: Steve Davenport
2. "L E-29-96
R-2 to R-3 Sec. 13-2544
Sponsor: Buster Heitman
;'1ssigneei T'lanner: I_Oui~ \Vchstcr
11116 WEST BROADWAY AVENU[ • SI't:)KANE, %ti'ASHWC;iON 99260
IIUILDINC. PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 4564703
1'[.ANNINC. I'f tc~Ut~ (509) 456-2205 • FAx- (509) 456-2243
'i'nn: 324-3166
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
;'1S BUILT YLANS RECE:IVFD
REZONE FILE# ZE-029-96 _96
Related File M (
AARD # ( DRZE- I83-96 )
Date to Review 09/25/1996 # 2
Date [o AA & DR 04/030996 Time 2:15
Dace Received 03/25! 1996
L.arge Lots 1°
Project Name B-2 TO B-3 HEITMAN- CARNINE COMME No. Locs o No. Acres 9.69
Range - Township - Section
A~5134.1557
SITE ADDRESS N SPRAGUElE CAP;NLNE/E CONKLIN PARCEL
Appiicant's Name BUSTER HEITMAIV Phone # 467-2123
Phone ZiY
Add~s 8205 N DIVISION
SPOKANE WA 99248
FLOOD ZOV E: No 1'V S ichoe7t 356 C)ate Conditions Mailed
E3illinb tiame Owner BUSTER HEITMAN L-ngineer PATRICK MOORE
Address Address 8205 N DIVISION Company I1VI.AivD PACIFIC ENGINEERI
SPOKANE WA 99208 Address 707 W?TH
MARYCLIFF I-IALL AVE STE
200
Signeci Phone 467-2I23 Ciry SPOKANE,WA 99204
Phonc Phonc/FAX (509)45$-6940 FaX (509)458-6W
Date
Building Contact Person: LORNE LAKSHASILOUIS WEBSTER Phone # 456-L675
Date Submitted DescriPtion Ititials
DATE FEES RECF,IVED
/ DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
- - ~
I ~ FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLET'ED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN '
~ l NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
; I DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
I I BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
r ! DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
; DATE ROND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
09/25/ 199Ct HEARIIr'G EXAM APPROVED )EN1ED 'I'EALED BCC
APPEALED PRUJECT APPROVCi3 EN1ED
I f STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYLlSUZANNE)
I / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASS[STANT (SANDY)
~
,k 1
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
AS M1(LT PLANS RECEIVL•D
DR REZONE FILE ZE -
Related File # ( )
AARD # ( DRZE-1$3-96 1
Date to Review #
Datc to AA & DR 4--4)1/03/1996 Time iJ
Date Reccivcd 03/25/ 199b
Project Name B-2 TO B-3 No. L,ocs o No. Acres 9.69 ~
Rar.ge - 'Township - Secdon ~
45134.1537 ~
i
SITE ADDRESS N SPRAGUE/E CA►]ZNINE/E COKLIN PARCEL
Applicant's Name BUS'I`ER HEITMAN Phone # 467-2I23
Address 8205 N DNISION Phone
SPOKANL- Vl'A 99?08
FLOOll ZONE No W S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed
Billing Name Owner BUSTER HEITMAN Engineer PATRICK MOORE
Address Addrzss 8205 N DIVISION Company INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERI
SPOKANE WA 99208 Address 707 W 7TH
MARYCLIFF HALL STE 200
City SPOKANE,WA 99204
Si ;
Bned Phone 467-2I23 Phone/FAX (509)458-6840 FAX (509)458-68
Phone ~
Date
u
Building Contact Person: LORNE LAKSHAS Phone # 456-3675
'Date Submitted Description Initials
DATE FEES RECEIVED ~
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECE[VED COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~
- - ~
;
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN ~
i
I I NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED '
~ l DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMiTTED/DATE COMPLETED - Ma1LED
! ! ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS ~
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE 1TEM CALCULATED
I
1 i DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED 1
I
I ! DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BU[LT RD PLANS
{
HEARING EXAM APPROVED )FNIED 'PEALGD BCC ~
APPEALED PRQJECT aPPROVED ENIED
I ' STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
~
r~ S - - - ~
L~~ T-
l r ,
. `
c{ C-
~
16
' V
I
, r -
. 1
; y . . / • ~ , _
' ` . ` - , - • _ O
~ n r
C?v1
~
~
4vc~
&I/I LM-Al -9 atL-e~ .
;
~ , - CuKiv, UV
- ,
y- ' J
. ► .
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 11, 1996 "
TO: Pat Harper
i
FROM: Steve Stai rs
~r
RE: Revised Heitman Carnine Threshold Traffic Study SPO&A~f C0MY
I have reviewed the technical aspects of the revised Heitman Carnine Threshold Traffic Study
and have found all of the comments discussed in our May 23 meeting with Ann Winkler to be
~ incorporated
In looking at the impacts of the site on the 2006 scenarios, it is interesting to note that the
progression factor used in the delay calculation was modified. This modification is allowable
under HCM `94, however, it should be realized that comparison of the delay and specific
movement LOS between the 2006 w/o project and 2006 w/ project should not be made The
effect of the modified progression factor reduced the delay and thus showed a better LOS for
some movements in the 2006 w/ project scenario than would have occurred with the
progression factors used in the other analyses.
The Synchro Traffic Analysis Software is best used with coordinated signal systems In
coordinated systems a progression factor is calculated based on the distance between signals,
traffic volumes, signal timings, etc Synchro automatically computes a progression factor for
each lane group of an intersection
Currently, Spokane County does not have any coordinated intersections, therefore, it would be
considered acceptable to use a progression factor of 0 85 for isolated intersections w/ actuated
control. The Eastbound leg of Sprague/Sullivan could be considered for use of coordinated
progression factors because of its proximity (0 25mi) to the Progress Rd signal, however, field
observations would be required.
The use of a different progression factor does not significantly affect the results reported For
Sprague/Sullivan, the reported intersection delay of 43.0 sec and LOS of E would be 49.1 sec
delay and LOS of E using a coordinated progression factor None-the-less, an LOS of E would
be maintained A copy of the LOS calculations is attached
7
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
April 4, 1996
W.O. No. 96048 RECEpVED
APk 0 5 1996
Pat Harper SP49(ANE COUNT
Spokane County Engineers Y ENGINEER
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Scope of Heitman - Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Study
Dear Pat:
Through a conversation which you had with Todd Whipple of our office and Buster Heitman, the
sponsor, it is my understanding that the scope of this traffic study is as follows:
This is a threshold level study wluch examines the traffic impacts at two nearby intersections.
This study needs to include a build out analysis only
The intersections included in this study are:
• Sprague & Conklin
~ Sprague & Sullivan
Phase 1 of Shelley Lake has been identified for inclusion in this traffic study as the only
background project and there are no reviewing agencies other than Spokane County.
The non site specific background growth rate to be used for this study is 2.5% compounded per
year, with build out anticipated approximately one year from now.
Tf the scope of tlus study is different, please let me know as quickly as possible.
Sincerely,
~
.
Ann L. Winkler, P E.
ALW/alw
cc: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Dnve • Suite 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814
509-458-6840 • FAX 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX 208-769-7277
JUL-01-1996 09:19 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01
~ WnhfRWO!1 SLate Eastrn A!gien
D:pmttti101'1t af TmRop01'M1Ql1 Z114 N. Mayfalr Stf egt
Sid MeMsvv+ Spokane, WA 992fT7-2090
Setvtvy ot Transportstlon (509) 32a-6000
RECAtVED
June 19, 3996 $PQKANE GQUNTY
JUN 2Q 10
OtW9fON Of BUONti AlVO MANN=
. Nir. Jotm Pedersoa By:
Spakenc CourFCp Planrring
1026 w, sroaaway
Spokaac, WA 99260
RE; Heitmaa-Csrnivt ComnaerCisl
Site Rmonc
Dear JoIm: •
~ I apprer.iated our cnnversatiaa of 6J18--yotu thoughts on thi4 rezaae were vesy helpfiuI.
I withdraw aur objectioa to the rezone. Wrth the distant'e this site is from c:tintai
' s on SR 90, ths impacts would be d'catlt to detemiae and Telativety =all•
Sb=ely,
' LECNARD CASH, PE R4onal PIsnaing Engineer
Pvstdt__.w- Drand Sax tcensmittat me+no W71 Paos s ~
,
I.CC:uca a' `
. ~
oa f 3 "cc: file
For f f
Attaclunertts
P ~
9~
Post-1V Fax Note 7671
Fro^
TO r e
.
co. ~ p '~L c,
ColOepG 3.
Ptione Phcne # LA
Fax 4G~%
# ~
r~
JUN-14-1996 13:36 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02
INLAND PACIFSC ENGINEERING, INC.
June 14, 1996
W.O. No. 96448
3ohn Pederson
Spakane County Planning
1026 yV Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0244 RE: Heatmaa - Carnine Commercia! Site Rezone
Dear John:
I have received my copy of a letter to you from Leonard Cash of the Washington State bepartment of
Transportation dated June 11 , ] 996 regarding this maEter. There are a couple of issues which the
VVash.ington State Departmeat of Transportation has brought up which should be addressed. These
items revolve around the impacts this proposal will have to the I-90 interchanges at Su}livan & Barker
and the potenual change in uses on this pascel due to the change in zoning.
I certainly understand the Was}iington State Depattment of Ttansportation's desire to preserve the
tcansportation netw+ork which is uader their jurisdiction, and it is my professional eagineering opinion,
as stated in the report, that this tezone will create no new Lrips at either I-90 interchange which is of
concem to the Washington State Departrnent of Transportation. The rezone is being sought to match
surrounding zoning and to maximize the uses available for this site. No particular use is in mind, and
the few land uses listed in the County zoning code which are allowed in B-3 zoning, but not in a B-2
zone are not big peak hour traffic generators. Therefore, I would anticipate no increase in the number
of trips generated from this site above what would be ailowed uader the existing zoaing.
T'he tratTic study focuses rnore on the difference between having no development (existing cond.inons)
and putting a land use on the site (future condition with project), rather than the difference between
the uses allowed under the B-2 zone and ihe different land uses allowed under tbe B-3 zone, It is my
professional engineering opinion that there will be no difference in the aruount of trips which will be
generated by the land uses which will eventually occupy this site under the existing B-2 zone versus a
future B-3 zone. However, tezoning this property will provide Mr. Heitman with the broadest ra.nge of
iand use options, and it is for this reason that the rezone is being sought.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. It there are any other outstanding issue with
regard to either the traffic study or the overall application, please let me know.
Sincerely,
.
Ann L. Winkler, P.E.
cc: Leonard Cash, Wa.sllington State Department of Transportation
Pat Harper, Spokane Caunty Engineering
Buster Heitman, L,andmark- Builders
707 West 7th • Suite 200 2024 Lakewood Orive • Suice 205
Spokane, wA 99204 Coeur d'A(enc, ID 83814
509-458-6840 - FAX: 509•458-6844 208-765•1784 • FAX: Z08-769-7277
1 ♦ C
'
t ~
\ ~k r
P
1
i
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
- DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DNISION OF'THE PUBLiC WORKS DEPARTMENT
]AMES L MANSON, C B O, DIRECTOR DENNIS M SCOTT, P E, DIRECTOR
MEMOR.ANDUM
TO: Pat Harper, Division of Engineering and Roads
Greg Figg, Washington State Department of Transportation
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner; Division of Building and Planning ~
,
DATE: June 6, 1996
Enclosed is the revised traffic analysis for the HeitmanlCarnine Commercial project
which was the subject of a design review meeting on Apri13, 1996. The traffic analysis
should include modifications based on your review comments of the initial traffic
analysis dated Apri125, 1996. Please review the updated traffic analysis and inform me
at your earliest convenience if the proposal can be considered "counter complete" by the
Division of Engineering and Roads.
c: Ann Winkler, Inland Pacific Engineering Company
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
ButLDtNG PxoNE (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
NIEMO
TO: John Pederson, Senior Planner
FROM: Pat Harper, Transportation Planning SupervisorQ*k%
DATE: July i, 1996
SUBJECT: Heitman, commercial rezone/Sprague and Carnine
FILE: Heitman, commercial rezone/Sprague and Carnine
John, Spokane County Engineering has reviewed the traffic analysis for the Heitman
commercial rezone and find it acceptable to go to public hearing. If you have any
questions relating to this analysis please contact me.
~
. ~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
June 14, 1996 J ~
W.O. No. 96048
SPaKP+NE COUiqTY E1,11GINEER
John Pederson
Spokane County Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 RE: Heitman - Carnine Commercial Site Rezone
Dear John:
I have received my copy of a letter to you from Leonard Cash of the Washington State Department of
Transportation dated June 11, 1996 regarding this matter. There are a couple of issues which the
Washington State Department of Transportation has brought up which should be addressed These
items revolve around the impacts this proposal will have to the I-90 interchanges at Suilivan & Barker
and the potential change in uses on this parcel due to the change in zoning.
I certainly understand the Washington State Department of Transportation's desire to preserve the
transportation network which is under their jurisdiction, and it is my professional engineering opinion,
as stated in the report, that this rezone will create no new trips at either I-90 interchange which is of
concern to the Washington State Department of Transportation. The rezone is being sought to match
surrounding zoning and to maximize the uses available for this site. No particular use is in mind, and
the few land uses listed in the County zoning code which are allowed in B-3 zoning, but not in a B-2
zone are not big peak hour traffic generators. Therefore, I would anticipate no increase in the number
of trips generated from this site above what would be allowed under the existing zoning.
The traffic study focuses more on the difference between having no development (existing conditions)
and putting a land use on the site (future condition with project), rather than the difference between
the uses allowed under the B-2 zone and the different land uses allowed under the B-3 zone. It is my
professional engineering opinion that there will be no difference in the amount of trips which will be
generated by the land uses which will eventually occupy this site under the existing B-2 zone versus a
future B-3 zone. However, rezoning this property will provide Mr. Heitman with the broadest range of
land use options, and it is for this reason that the rezone is being sought.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. It there are any other outstanding issue with
regard to either the traffic study or the overall application, please let me know.
Sincerely,
.
.M~v`. .
Ann L. Winkler, P.E.
cc: Leonard Cash, Washington State Department of Transportation
,~a~t a.rper, Spokane County Engineering
U
Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
707 West 7lh • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Swte 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814
509-458-6840 • FAX 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX 208-769-7277
. ,
~
VWashington State Eastern Region
Department of Transportation 2714 N N~a/lair StresE
,
Sid Morrison Spokane, %PlA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportabon (509) 324-EGOC
. , . . . ,ti
RECEIVED
,
June 11, 1996 JUN 1 31996 Mr. 7ohn Pederson
Spokane County Planning -
1026 West Broadway Avenue SPOKANE COUNTY EPlGINEER
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re: Heitman-Carnine Commercial Site
Zone Reclass-I 90/Sullivan Road
Dear Mr. Pederson:
On June 7, 1996, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) planning
. office received a Threshold Traffic Study for Heitman Carnine Commercial Site (Modified
on June 4, 1996 to incorporate Spokane County Engineering Department Comments).
Within this traffic study there is no mention of any traffic impacts on the Sullivan Road/I-
90 interchange nor on the Barker RoadlI-90 interchange. On Apri13, 1996 a letter was
sent from WSDOT planning to Spokane County planning, requesting that these
interchanges be included in the traffic study and that a scoping meeting should be
scheduled. It would appear that neither of these took place.
The rezone request from a B-2, Community Business to a B-3, Regional Business does not
appear to be supported by the trip distribution. It appears the trip distribution applied
would be appropriate for a small community type business with local neighborhood draw.
With a zone request of B-3, Regional Business there should be some portion of the traffic
coming from outside of the immediate neighborhood if SRTC's regional traffic model
was not utilized for this study, what was the basis for the modeling?
With presently approved development in the traffic sheds of the Sullivan Road/I-90
interchange, and the Barker Road/I-90 interchange, our traffic analysis is showing a
lowered level-of-service in some movements. With that in mind, I would request that this
traffic study be returned for modification to reflect what traffic modeling system was
utilized, and to reflect what the actual impacts are to the referenced interchanges.
Mr. Pederson
June 11, 1996
Page 2
If you should have any questions regarding these comments need further information
regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me in our Regional Planning Office at
(509) 324-6199.
Sincerely,
i~--
~
LEONARD CASH, PE
Regional Planning Engineer
LCC:gjb
Attachxnent
cc: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
Pat~ MI e~ e Yr,~Spok•a , e~ou~naty7Engine'er'sf
Ann Winkler, Inland Pacific Engineering
Project file
` 1 . . ♦ ~
't •
~
Washington State Eastern Region
Department of Transportation 27 14 N N~a7'a r st`ee~
Arf Sockane V'!r 99207-2C=C
Sid Morrison
:;~cretary of Tr2r.soor;n;,on (509) 324-6i.CO
April 3, 1996
Ms Lorne Lakshas
Spokane County Planning
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA. 99260-0240
Re. Heitman Zone Reciass
I-90/Sullivan Rd
Dear Ms Lakshas
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above referenced zone reclass. The
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the following comments
Because of the larQe trip potential associated with a Regional Business zone and the
capacity that has been committed to existin~ projects, WSDOT is concerned reaarding
possible adverse impacts to the transporation system that may occur We request the
applicant perform a traffic study to determine any possible adverse impacts to the I-
90/Sullivan Road interchanae, and the I-90Barker Road interchange that may occur as a
result of this rezone We would ask that the applicant, through Spokane County Plannina,
schedule a scopinEz meetina to discuss the contents of this traffic study
If you should have any quest►ons or need further information re~ardin~ this matter, please
feel free to contact me in our PlanninLy Orrice at 324-6199. -
Sincerely,
, ~
LEONARD CASH, PE
ReQional Plannincr Engineer
LCC-ja
cc Project file
j~ 6
,9• 9
.
Z~
.
_ o
,
r
cloov,F. ~
-
- - _
~ r ~~~~+ti_+ ~~~r ' .r~ _ ~ •
~ ` 1
. ;
, c
t•R ~c- • ~
, . . . .
lii't ER ~
~
_r.;,,,~ ~ •
. ~ o
1 `
E
- ► ~c, ~ t v
t'C
a
. ~ Q
, `Ra~' fl~ti r• ~ , `i
m ~
r ~atio~ • ' " ~ - ~+Z
a r - - ~
1 f "r~, ti ~,f J
(
► x
. t`A~►~N a
1 ~ • ~ .
I ~ ✓ ~ + ! ~ '
`}y ~ a y y h r' /
~ , = i~~ ' .h~-~ _ .Q ' -
i iPR
• p~. P ~ t ~
3 ct D i ~
T r
. - " ~ `L~~,~ w • N
L ~ i ~ • •`+swAV+
C)r E ~
~ , ~ , ^~'`--r ~ N• .4 C~ Q
I ~ELtEY ,
;.vT~.•
-1~X~
y
ai CeX;. „ ~ . • 1
• ~ 1
`Y':•~'~~ - 1
~
. AYt ~ ~ a- t 2714
y rr+
\ ■
ZE=29=96 ~
~ a .o.,m.• - w
• _1 9orro t ` = ~ o ' + °~x,~ \
_ C100 x, R K, ,,r o•` .
- ~ ~ ~ • • ' i~y E - " ; r~::
7 \ eTi-~ J{
.r~ I •
~ _ • 12
. • ~ ' r~ 20~7 Q ~WYa
. ~ ~ • O O
~ e
. • ~ ~ w • GO ~ ` • ~//t'~ ~ o .
A~• , iw BOrCOW v' ''i ' c •`t, ll•
;j10N
~a s ~Pity' ~ 'f ~ ° • ..`Il
~ ~ - ~I VOtj
y O 1
. ~ ' . ~ a I
~~wv~ Sulliven ~c~ ~ e• 'L
Park . •~JI'. . , o- . .
' ~ » ~ ° • o 2o20 = -
, _RN , ` _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . o o ~ o ~ -
. _ L ~ - • ~ ~ ~ . o ~ ° ,
' • • • • ~ • •
' _V _ ~ = a~ m °O a o I o
` • 0 Iw ` „ ` ~ f ~ a . • . ~•r•
1000 ~ `o ` ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ •
•1 •
: `-s~ . . _ , _ r •
P.reenacres
a~ , L . ~ . o,
- t. .
. ~ ~r ; . o - ~
o ~ tE• b 2031:
I - < - . • •
~ t ~ ~ r . • • N • • • D
go ° ° ;
Li 2030
2~, ~R 0 WAX3 : 18
_4, , ~ ~ . . : . . . . ~ , ,
• ° • • : :
°q ~ ~~~I;; ~ • ° .a~ooo
-r ~ t 1 res o
~ • ~ . . . ~ 9 ~ ~ _ . . : • . : . , . .
~ ' , ••j •
•
- ! ^~I 1 ~ • •o Q•, • ~1/~•~Q ~ • o ~ • p h • • . .
p r ~ ~ ' •1' ~
Y• • i~ • . _ ~v eo oww
~ I . • . . : • ^ , ~ • ~1p
VALLEY . • ~ . Si'i-i ~ . • ~ ~,y ~ ~ f~i o I • f~ ~~i~
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ • • O o a O • • ° a 1 1. •
< ~ . ~ ° o Jr HtRh 1 : o ' =,`J % • ~
~ ~ ~ ~ •
_ • • ~ gGh -,a ~ •
" ~ ~ • • • •
'Q^~_T - ~'ir='1 ~ i...:7 ~fl ~ • a ~r
o~ • u Vera~Ie : o T.
. ~ O ! ~ i~ , ~~II~~ ♦ ~ 4i • ~3 • o . O •
_ - ~ ~ _ * • ` r~ • •
y? . -Q ~ ■ ; i. • '~'~sa,+,~~•~,~A~. ~ ~ ,r~,~' ~ . .
a . . . • • o 'o 0 0 $P
r • • • ~ ~
ST ~ . . • . .
y M .~~1• • • ` ~ '
- ya - -r . . • Gravel Pitx ~ . . • ~
. - , . - . . ~
c17 • o ~ • r " . . je + t ~ fet 205! •
2014 ~ ' • • • r'~ Park J ~ - - `
, . . r . : . _ .
.o!• ' f %i_. ~~l ~ .Z060
a• • .1 ! / q! • - . • . , -
Adema .i: Zoz°
,
.4CF+. • ° o • • i ~ , r ; , , ° u
- ~ . -
c 1 . ~ in' i~ ( , ti`'. 19. _ _ ~ •
• f ~ P ~ r • ` 4 •t~ s~r:c~
~ ~ • • • ~ CBtlti'il V8ll9,y L
.a ~ _ -3•• f ; • . , ~FiiRN•Set► I~', ~ S *e+ka e D~sRosa~
c '
. a 2 _ a , u • I : .
" sew ~ ~ ~ • ♦ J~ ~O 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I
f ' ~ ~4 ' ' , '•y4 ~ u ' _ ' ~ . _ ;t .
• ~ ~ • o • ' 1 = u • . - - , `
)
I: :j°~ ~ ~ • q ' ' t ~ ~ X~
i~~'t~. !_~~-_t_~! ~ _~~i.•t__!.1 X]OP C.7
~ • • • • ~ ~7 • i . r • ! i. ~ 1 ~ i
n a o . . ~ 1 r n , r r ,i . ~ ~ =
- a. o ! 1 ~ ~t t ~ -
~ . i ~ % e P► y'~;~ ~ ~ ~ . \ ~ 1-
: ~ ~ ~y~i~J • • i ~ ~ ' e ' " `~t/, • •
• I/~
• t ~ ~ e • ~ • • ~ o + • ~ ' ~ ' I ~ J~ ~ A A. ~ 2300 ~ ~ % r- ~ t
~ . • ~ , - „ i~. ~ ~w,' ' r ` 1 - ~ 4 ~ -
. ~
;rj ,
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ "p~ . ~.•1 .
L
,L7il~
- 1 L~7l~ . I % 4 I ; ~ i , ,t l , ~ ' ~l `l ~ t f -
° ' ,,'`i~ , , f„ "r.' . - <<! • I ' t ,
~ •i ~i tL'
im. e ~ , • • ~ ry~ , ~I - J ~ • ` • ' .
n LI i • ~ q. . ~ ~ .
i I
• a~ ~ ,r / Jj I
~ °u • l . . ~ I i 1 /r ' + i ! t 1 ~i
{ t i /~~~y.~~ ( t ~ ' •
9 . . S 1 t ~a w ' - ~ • , ~ t
; . . ..,,24 TN k • • • - • • -,:j-~' _ " ~ = ~ ; , - x s~=
~ t -Wefi~CJ,- • -A~j~ 1 ~ l,; J i ~ , ~ ~ ~ -~r_ ` , . - •
aas~ • . , _ , ! ~'(r _ T' , ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' _
- ~ ' fC-, { • . ~ ~ '1 r••= .
• ~ ( ~ ~ ~J^ , ,
. /
9/25I96 I-IE Staff Raport i or ZE-29-96 Pase
. ~
~ ZE =29=96
8orroMr t d► ~ ~ • ' • ~~~1*'=
~i~
~
.
; • - .-----.y~ - ~
12
~ , ~ • ~ • ~ ' + • fV~7 17 ♦ _ ~
~ • ~ • ~ t •
~ ~ • ~ po
B ~ ~ ~ • ~ . ~ Y + o .
~C~,`~+~i•~ .-.1 ` ° t . . • a^ ~ 1' ' .
. ~ , ° . , • • ~ ~
` ~ .
~ ~ ~ • • • • • • U p
~
\ - ~ ~ . Q ~ ==•0 O 9 C L D • • ~
`1 \ o r~ . '
~ • . ° ~ ~ a~
~ . ~ ~L. . , • ~ ° ~
U0
. `y y • ~ ~ e M/SSION a ~ i
s. s.. • .uBM 2037
; •e' • • ~ • ~ \ii • • ~~~~u~ i~• ~ • `
- - . ~ . . ~`t~
• - ~ ~ - ° ~ w
~y . ' . • . Pa~~~.~ %.~~~~•;:a.
°Ug'e...Ilai'Te'3~' :;.o.::.-;::..:~•~ .
• . o~. . ~ . o
° • ' ° - .t• • , -s::.:z ~ ~ o
. . • ~
, . . . ' ~ _ _ . . • . a
j
. , ` • . .
~ . . - • ~ - • _ .
, - . .
.
i o Q e ' a ~ • ~ ~ • Q• ~ ~
. - 1 . ; . ~-T • ' ''i18 • • • •
e o o . . r
• • ~ ~~rT•1 ~ • • '
To
r ~ • ~ ~
~ " ~ ~ ° ~ • a i ~ * o 00
- ~L ~ . . _ . • • .r • . . . t .
, ~•T a~ ~ ~S i~• ~ ~ o ~p ti • • • ~~~~I~•
_~v: ~ jQ,j2 ~ ' • r • • • ~
• ' ~ ~ ' ' •1~. O `1~ . • O
r~ ,d~%.Afi~ ' •O ~ + _ ee •a n s t~.• ~ oes' 0 • ~ •
.._~_E ~ •~.~'.~i ~ ~ •~~a.~~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ '
j'W~ „ ~ ~ f~• ~ • ~ 00.00" ~ ~ ° ' • ~ ~ ~ t?
;f.i~ ~ e o • o ~ ~ • • • • D ° ~ • • •
• O 0 •
• . . ~ C ~ C ~ ~p ~H~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~"k
y.
• .tr•
, • • 'v 1 ~ } ~,i~ .
10 ♦ d ~ ~o . ~
vi~•~~~a ~ , h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ • • ~ 0 d~ ~ • ~ 40 • d• i ~r~~~• •I:~o ~
001=PMt _
er ~ ~ ~ • ~ • --Wo~ •r e~~~s /1 i~i i~ • " • • f~~s_asr•-. .
• • ~ ~ • • ~ OO ~ a ~ / 4 ~ O • it~ ' ~ ~ • ~i • ~ a •SPRAOIl~t•1~s3
~ ' P r i a •Aa • • .
I_N • • •
• • ~ 7 Vo • I _ 7 a ' r ~ • • ~ ~
_ ► . ~ • ~ j ~ ~ Grare! Aitx 3.
• • • • ♦7N • ~I AVC . L-__ ~ ~ ~ ~
.y~ •tt • _ r•' • t ?05 1
r i. ~ s~`~.-~.y.... •
• ~ ~ • • - • a • s » . Psrk . . . . ~ • • , 1 r~ - ~•y~ o ~ ~ o a b ~ .
~ • , e •
~
! ~ •
,0~~ ~ ~ a ,
s r~ - r• Q i ~ M : l
•
0 +
u • 02 0 or.
i ~ • , ' ' v ~ ~ ' 19 0 , ,
0: ~ ! r CatnTqaUh - 24
~I~ •"g~ ~ ~ ~ y J~ V~1Q~II . ` ~L~i f
GfaMQl .
J• ~ •~1.~• ~ ~t~~ ~
~ • i ~ • r ~ ~ r
o • • "~it~ e. ~ f ' . • a _ - ~ ~
~ .•1.1.•...... • ~ ± fl
•I • ' d•'f~i.,
.f • , ; , . ~
' ~ ' P gw
Pr: 063 ` .
~ AVr~_ • ~
+ ~ .Y.`I"1• f ~ •~•~Yt"1'~_r. .~~T' , .
~a 't..~~'.•~'~••. _
y; ~ . . . •a. :
~ ~ - _ ;N ' • . 4 ~ . ~ .
a ~ o f aa a e r c a ~ ~.•~f: t . L
,rJ'y~ ..o • : : : • . . .
tl ~ I . , ';c. ~:i~:~.-.~• .
' .
s. a ~ y~ . . ~
:
- . . ~ ~ :~3:=•~••:•.~:~~•~~~'~'•'~'~' ~
•:jyati:::•:~~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ M+O I . ~ 0 ~ 4 ~ . • 1
~~~R~ ~ . • • 1
TN . •:~•i.•. : ~ . . . . ,Lt
~ ~ ~,t . • ~ ~
i. ~ • ~ . : . . r . . . . ,
~ i /1 ~ ~ :ti - • - • . ~ : •f•'•:•.ti•:. •
1.'. 1: : ~ ` .
~ ~ ~ a -ti0. . . . . . . : . . . . .
• ~ ~ • ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ •~~'~'~'~.:~~1 ~.~~++1~. ~Z ' ~
. ~
~ • i . ds - - - x~~: . . . . . . . ~
9/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page
- ZEmi,29-=96 ~
BR IOG E
~ N*450 6
. ~o~ .
UL
~r♦ ~r ~ ,
. - ~-SR0AE>w.4Y' ,yv IE .
~ ~ ~ it'e
~ogrP~.~ tation
~ h c~0 I ~
~ o ~
~
sc URC130S . ~
a &-LE WAY _
~ P--..-•• ~ ~ . _ ~
. • U '
R-15 ,
~.Cl_ .
. _ A 802 8.2 .4
4 r.• , _ . . M w
1~2 N ! y UR-(ii a ' ••y~~~~{Y.k~. ti.~4 • . I
, CC
3" ' S}rr
j1
•B-2
. 8~ U f,w
- - PRACUE
. ~ . ~ .a N N B_3 N
~ ~ _ B_~
I _2
~a B
3
~ ~ O m,. - : • - ..m . / R R c,Q .
G 1►-1 ~T. - t
~ ~ uR-7
' ~ u e
U ~•2 ~ 2 . I.J
UR-~
uZ T e
W
• ~ • ~ • ~ ,
TII 8R'Or-E v~
6 - ~ ' LEYJ N• 4~09
; ' . ~~nt.rv o (1'e~•:.':. ' ~L.~.~E ~ ,
. .f•I ;L'~`~ ~ % i
.t'. ::;.ii: • ;•j
aN~ N /►VE
~ ~ - + ~ .:::+:i~~'i ~ ^ • ,
9 TH ~ - •C.V:' ~c
. , . :H:I:G•H" Wcj3L5 4, ~ ~ H F" • . 1 .
• Vf N
' tl ff1 AV ~ ~ ' -
2 r4 :
A~~ ~
4
O I.
v '
a
L
~
~r
14TA .4v~ ~ . -
I, /s711 .,.•c. ` ~ ~ ~
.
. ~ ~c. ~ I .
u W=Z2 ' I
n ~ TN ~ ~ Y t
sIxTEeNrH t- ulc
9/25196 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page
1 . .
DIVISION []F BLTILDING AND FLANNI~G REPORT
T0: SPOK4NE CC)LTNTY HEARING EXANffNER
FRO1VI: CURRF-NT PLANNTNG SECT'ION
DATE; SEPTEMBER 25x 1996
SUBJECT. ZE-29-96; ZONE RECLASSZFICATION FROM CC3MMIJNITY BUSINESS
(B-2) TO REC'rIONAL BUSINESS (B-3)
I, GEIVERAII TNF(]RMATIQN
ApplicantlOwvaer: Buster Heitma.n, Landrnark Builders
8205 N. Division Street
Spokane, WAL 99208
(509) 467-2123
Cuntact Planner: Lauis Webster
Loca#ion: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue and
east of Carnme Road, in the SE 114 0f Section 13, Township 25
Nartb, Range 44 EWNi, Spokane Couniy, Washingtan.
Prropusal; Zone Reclassification ftom Comrnunxty Busi.ness (B-2) to
Reglonal Susiness (B-3) for those nses a1lowed in the Regi4nal
Business (B-31) zone.
8125196 HE Staff Repart for ZE-29s96 Page T
, . ~
II. SITE INFORMATION
A. Site Size: Approximately 9 acres
B. Comprehensive Plao
1. The Comprehensive Plan category of the subject property is Major Commercial.
The subject property is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The
Major Commercial (C) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping
centers and commercial uses, directly related to major throughways.
Regional Business (B-3) zoning is intended to implement the Major Commercial
category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zone reclassification from
Community Business (B-2) zone to Regional Business (B-3) implements the
Goa1s, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category of
the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Arterial Road Plan: The subject property is located on
Sprague Avenue which is identified on the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as
a Principal Arterial with a future right of way width of 130 feet. The Spokane
County Division of Engineering has requested that ten (10) feet of additional right
of way be set aside as a future acquisition area or (FAA).
3. County Parks Plan: Sullivan Park is located about a mile north of the subject
property and is the closest county park.
C. Site Characteristics: The site is level, vacant and undeveloped.
D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The subject property is fairly large and spans at
least two different neighborhoods. The neighborhood associated with the south half
of the subject property is characterized by Sprague Avenue and the existing
businesses along Sprague Avenue. The neighborhood associated with the north half
of the subject property is characterized by planned and existing single family
residences.
E. Zoning Analysis: The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive
business zone in Spokane County. The nearest existing Regional Business (B-3) zone
is adjacent to the southeast corner of the subject property . There is additional existing
B-3 zoning west of the subject property along Sprague Avenue and directly south
across Sprague Avenue. The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is consistent with
existing zoning and land use trends in the vicinity.
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 2
~ . .
Proposal: Community Business (B-2) established in 1991, previously established
as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42).
North: Urban Residential-3.5 (LTR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42).
South: Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) established in
1991, previously established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42) and
Commercial (C) in 1977 and 1959 (55-77 and 11-59).
East: Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) established in
1991, previously established as Agriculture (A) in 1942 (60-42) and
Commercial (C) in 1967 (4-67).
West: Community Business (B-2) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
established in 1991, previously established as Agricultu.re (A) in 1942
(60-42) and Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) in 1978 (129-78C).
F. Land Use Analysis: The subject property is located on Sprague Avenue and the
proposed zoning is consistent with land use and development trends along Sprague
Avenue. The existing residences to the east and the existing residential lots to the north
across Main Avenue are subject to disruption but they are separated from the subject
property by eYisting roads. Section 14.806.040 (2) of the Spokane County Zoning
Code requires five (5) feet of Type III landscaping as a buffer between the subject
property and the roads.
Site: Vacant and undeveloped.
North: Vacant and undeveloped although platted for single family residences.
South: Vacant, commercial, manufactured home park.
East: Commercial (Sun Rental and Valley Eagles).
West: Single family residences and vacant.
G. Site Plan: No site plan has been submitted for this proposal but a preliminary short plat
has been approved for the subject property. (see file # SP-1069-96) Shown below are
development standards of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone.
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 3
. . ►
Buildiniz Setbacks ReQuired
Front yard (Sprague Avenue) 65 / 35 feet
Front yard (Main Avenue) 65 / 35 feet
Flanking yard (Carnine Street) 65 / 35 feet
Side yard (east) 0 feet
Parking Subject to specific
use per Section 14.802
Maximum
Structure Height: 35 / 65 feet per
Section 14.628.335
H. Circulation: The Spokane County Engineer and Fire District #1 will need to approve
any proposed access and internal circulation prior to the issuance of building permits.
A Threshold Traffic Study dated June 4, 1996 was performed for the proposed zone
reclassification. The conclusion was that development of the site will have no impact
on neighboring intersections and so no mitigation is proposed.
1. Drainage: A drainage plan will be required prior to the issuance of any building
- permits. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer
prior to building permits being issued.
J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: None known.
K. Water Supply: The proposal is served by the Vera Water District. Provisions for
water service are required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
L. Sewage Disposal: Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County. On site sewage disposal may be authorized. Plans and
specifications will be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
M. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District. No comment has been
received.
N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. No comment has been
received.
0. Cultural Resources: None have been identified.
P. Parks and Recreation: No comments have been received.
Q. Wetlands: No wetlands are shown on the Spokane County Wetlands Inventory Maps.
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 4
1 . .
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the Division
of Building and Planning. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other
available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard
Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and
guidelines. The Division of Building and Planning has determined that "No probable
significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a
Deternunation of Nonsignificance ("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 10 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The
"DNS" comment period ends September 23, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar days
before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of
the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner
may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing.
IV. DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANiNING SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
use is consistent with the existing land uses and zoning trends in the neighborhood. The
Division of Building and Planning recommends approval, as conditioned.
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Egaminer shall be binding on the
"Applicant", wbich terms shall include the owner or owners of the property,
heirs, assigns and successors.
ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property:
Tract 14 of Vera according to the plat recorded in book "O" of Plats, Page 30, in the
Spokane County Auditor's Office, Spokane County, State of Washington; EXCEPT
the North 25.00 feet thereof: ALSO EXCEPTING Right of Way as deeded for
Sprague Avenue.
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 5
. .
SPOKANE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive
Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept
presented to the Hearing Body. Variations when approved by the Division Director/designee,
may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location landscape plans and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in
the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
3. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve
as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only
be released, in full or in part, by the Spokane County Division of Building Planning. The
Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action
by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [
imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for
inspection and copying in tbe Spokane County Division of Building and Planning.
4. Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing
plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable
to the Division Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond, or other
suitable guarantee, for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
6. Direct light from any eYterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
bounciary.
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 6
~ 7. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest possible
stage in order to be informed of code requirements administeredlenforced as authorized by
the State Building Code Act. Designldevelopment concerns include: Addressing, fire
apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility,
construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy code
regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to confirm the
actual address at the time of building permit.)
Attached are comments and recommended conditions of approval fornl interested agencies:
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority; dated August 29, 1996
Spokane County Health District Environmental Health Division; dated August 28, 1996
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; dated September 25, 1996
8/25/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-29-96 Page 7
_ RECEIVED "
SPOKANE COUNTY
. . r
AU G 2 9 1996
~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISiON (3F BUIIDING AND PLANNING
~~~~Apt,,.e `12 AIR POLIU i ION ev
S P o K A N E CONTROI AUTHORITY
WES i 1101 COLLEGE, SUITE 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 •(509) 456-4727 Fax (509) 459-6828
Date: August 29, 1996
To: Louis Webster
Spokane County Department of Building & Planning
From: Mabel Caine
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Subject: SCAPCA COMMENTS REGARDING : File No. ZE-29-96
SQOnsor: Buster Heitman; Qroiect site: N of Spractue, E of Carnine Road
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the information submitted to our office.
Inadequate information was provided, such that our comments could be specific to this project.
However, following is a list of concerns/issues that, at a minimum, need to be addressed for this
project. SCAPCA encourages proponents to coritact their offices at 1101 West College,
Spokane, WA 99201 for additional information.
~ All air pollution regulations must be met.
* Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should
be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well
as emissions from all other construction related activities.
* SCAPCA strongly recommends that all travelled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking
areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions.
* Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
* SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V, requires that a Notice of Construction and Application
for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the construction,
installation or establishment of an air pollution source. This includes any fuel fired
equipment rated at greater than 400,000 BTU/hour (boilers, hot water heaters, ovens,
etc...). It also includes paint booths, and other sources of air contaminants.
* Chapter 173-491 WAC requires that gasoline dispensing facilities with an annual
throughput of 360,000 gallons or greater or new facilities with nominal storage capacity
of greater than 10,000 gallons must install Stage I vapor recovery equipment by
December 31, 1993 or upon construction or upgrade to the facility.
~ . .
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
RECEiVED
SPOKANE COUNTY DATE• 5-28-96
SEF 1 0 1996
l DIVISI4N F 9(1i LT0: Louis Webster, AICP, Planne~~II, Spoane ~9f Building and Planning
FROM. Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SCHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change ZE- -96 Heitman
~
~
1. References.
a) Map of subject scale 1"=1000', by Spokane County Department of Building and Planning, updated,
August 28, 1996.
b) Reconnaissance Geoloeic Man of the West Half of the Spokane Ouadrantzle. Washinp-ton and Idaho, Allan
B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survev. Sookane Countv. Washineton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S D.A., March, 1968
d) Sookane Countv. WashinLrton. En2ineerina Intemretations, Soil Conservation Service, U S.D A, August,
1974.
e) Spokane Countv Rules and Reeulations for Sewage Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of water wells in Range 44,45E, Township 25N, Sections 12,13,14,18, and 24
g) Map- Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S, 1973, and Spokane N.E, U.S.G.S, 1973
2 Findings:
a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Vera Water
& Power Water supply will be a public system
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80 0418 adopted March 24, 1980 The topography and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lot is not of
the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area east of Carnine Road and south of Main Ave Local
drainageways are insignificant.
1
August 28, 1996
ZE-20-96 -Heitman
Page 2
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison Gravelly Loam with 0% to 5%
slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible contamination of
groundwater This soil would be classified as a Type IV
fl Geologically, the soils are Glaciofluvial deposits These geological structures generally yield moderate to very
large amounts of water Data from wells in the area referenced in section lf shows they are from 81' to 457'
deep and have static water levels varying from 42' to 120' below the surface The Vera Water & Power has
indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion agreements with the proponent.
3 Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County
Engineer and Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any on-site sewage disposal
pernut or building permit for this project.
b) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
d) Water service shall be by a an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
e) Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited
fl Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of
individual on-site sewage disposal system may be authorized
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval-
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited
c Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: Buster Heitman
8205 N Division
Spokane, WA 99208
landuse 1tr12E-20-96-Heitrnan/fg
: . •
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONES
T0: Spokane County Planning Department
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads'~ ~tA.
DATE: 09/17/96
PROJECT: B-2 to B-3 Heitman - Carnine Cominercial
FILE ZE-029-96 / (DRZE-183-96)
Hearing/Review Date: September 25, 1996
Sponsor/Applicant: Buster Heitman
Section Township Range: 13-25-44
Plazner: Louis Webster
Design/Review Date: (April 3, 1996 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
appreved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing
to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the
formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate
. in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to
Sprague Avenue, Main Avenue.
5 As an aiternative method of constructing the road improvements stated
herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Eng?neer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and
participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cos"L
of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue
• and Main Avenue.
CC: Applicant Suster Fleitman
Engineer/Surveyor Patrick Moore
. ♦ :
Page 2
September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
6 The -construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7 The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be cor_structed.
8 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of Main Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
9 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pert-aining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer.
10 Access to Carnine and Main Avenue shall be prohibited until such time
as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer.
11 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
12 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer. Al1 work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
13 No construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is
to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in
an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of
construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer.
14 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following:
/
~
r,
Page 3 t September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in
consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do
for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the
above 3escribed property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and
to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for
improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and
authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW
36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast
their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution
method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest
against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43
RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described
below, said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree: (1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and
expense of formation of the RZD, and (3) that the property within
the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the
right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements
called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the
petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal
to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided
further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to
the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the
property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by
Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole
expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the
improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten
(10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is
applicable to Main Avenue and Sprague Avenue.
15 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not
consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the
Artexial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required
right of way dedication, a strip of property 10 feet in width along
the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property
may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
I '
►
. s
Page 9
September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
16 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
17 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
18 A traffic analysis has been done for this land use proposal. Based on
information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by
the applicant at Conklin and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be
improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road
beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the
signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates
a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue also has the responsibility to
construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in
the study warrants are now being met at this intersection if any new
final plats are done for this plat it would be the developers
responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move
ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone adequate
sure.ty shall be provided to insure the construction of the
signalization.
f + ~
DETERMINATION OF
NQNSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
RESPONSII3LE OFFICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMFNTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBTR(S): ZE-29-96
DCSCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Community Business (B-2) to
Regional Business (B-3) on approximately 9.69 acres for those uses allowed in the Regional
Business (B-3) zone.
APPLICANT: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
8205 N. Division Street
Spokane, WA. 99208 (509) 467-2123
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and east of Carnine
Road in the SE '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANL COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments rcgarding this DNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., September 23, 1996, if they are intendecl to alter the
DNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
By: Louis Webster, AICP Title: Planner II
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 \ ` -
,
DATE ISSUED: /30 , 1996 SIGNATURE:
COMMENIS REGARDING ENVTRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE HF.ARiNG.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COLTNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNTNG, (MS-P), 2nd Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's
appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to
make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you
with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
] . WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. ~ 1 ,~!~aiu~~~~►~ ~o~- r•i ;
3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
4. Spokane County Health District; Steve Holderby
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Wyn Birkenthal
7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
8. Fire Protection District No. 1
9. Central Valley School District No. 356
10. Vera Water & Power
.
, •
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSITICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
NAMEOFAPPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
MAlLING ADDRESS: 8205 N. Di vi s i on Street
Ci1-y; Spokane STATE: WA ZIp: 99208
PHONE: 4 6 7- Z 12 3 (work) (home)
IT APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Sam t'J PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE A.REA (acres or sq. ft) 9.69 Acres
AUJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) None
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45134,1557
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED N/a
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL None
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B- 2
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY V a c a n t
PROPOSED ZONING B - 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Ma j o r Comme rc i a 1
SCHOOL DISTRICT C e n t ra 1 U a 11 e Y
FIRE DISTRICT No. 1
WATER PURVEYOR V e ra
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business (Xl Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) -
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLA,NNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING 'I`HIS PROPERTY:
No Zoning Action since 1942
B. LEG,AL/ZQNF RECLASSII+'ICATION INr(aRMATION;
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: North of Spraque Ave., East of Carni ne Road
SECTION 13 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 44 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Spraque Avenue and Carni ne Road
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 1280' ±
r -
Z+ONI:, RECLASS1FICA'11JN 1hFF'LrCAnON ' Page 2 of 4
T]OES TI-E PROPOSAL I-iAV,E A.CCESS TO AN ARTERIAL DR PLANNED ARTERiAL Xx} YES NO
1~AI~C(s) oF ARTERIAL ROADS Spra.que Avenue
L~~AL DEs~RTTrOrv OF PROP,~RTY FoR F-Acx ZoNE x~CLAsSrFrcATZON PROFosF-D.
Tract 14 of Vera accordi na to the plat recorded i n Baok "0" of P] ats,
-2-a-ge ID.~~ t-be S~o~ane County AuAitor's Offi ce. Sr)okane Countv. State
of " aton:-F-X.CFPJ the North 25.00 feet thereQf: ALSO EXCEPTING
W~v as decded far SDraaue Avenue
EXISTIlNG ZoNiE(S)-- B-2 , TO PROPOSED ~ONE(S)_ B-3
FUR THE ~'OLLQWING DESCRTBED
RROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCR1CP'I'IQN STAIvII'ED BY LAND SURi VEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELC3W.
Same as Above
IF YCIU DQ NOT 14OLD n`ILE TC? TRE PROPERTY, WHA.x IS YOCTR 1NTEREST TN ZT? __A1'A
WHAT ARF- TBE CI3ANCiED CONDIT7ONS OF THF, A,REA WHI~H YC]U FEEL IvfAKE ThCI'S
PROPO5AL WARRANTED? AdJacent Dror)erties have been rezaned to 8,3.
Thi s rezone will match zaninq i n the surroundinq area particularl ya1 ang .
the Spraqc~e Avenue Corridor.
V~HAT IMPACT WTLL THE P,RC)POSED ZONE RECLASSIFICAT~ON HAVE ON THE ADJA,CENT
RROPERTFES"~ The ZDne chance from B-2 to B-3 wil l resultin few impacts ta adjacent
pr'opertiL5, Ii t few i mpacts there wi 17- be, wi 11 be mi ti qated usinq bufferi nq and
screeaing methods in accordance with County 5tandards between this site and surraunding
res7dentia1 areas.
wHAT FACTORS SUPPOR"rTHE ZONE RECLASSMICATION? Comqrehen5ive P1 an supports th7 s
rezonp 5d~-ect Roverty~mppt-, _h.p._f~araosp ~nd intent af the B-3 zane per Section
14. 62~ Ldjacea praDerties have received Zone uDqrades,
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPQSC TOM MITIGATE YQUR PRQPOSAL'S TMPACT"
SII~tRO[~ING LA~ ~1SE'~ Bufferi ng between this site and the UR-3 ~1~
si te to the
to the rrorth wiT 1 he requi red as part of any B-3 use af thi s property. The bufferi ng
wi1 1 meet Caunty Standards.
} Zc~~ RECLAssIFrCATIOr~ ~PLICATrON Page 3 of 4
.
PART 11
THT5 SEC7'ION DF THE A.PPGTCATTON WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNiIVG DEPARTMENT STAFF WT!'H
W1t=N iVERIFICATION'THA'T" THE APPLiCA.NT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CC]NSULTA'IION WITH 7`HE
AGENCIES I,I]ENT'IFTEU. RESLTLTS OF T'HE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHAI}T. BE INCORPORATED
,IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FIlVAL SUBMITTAI. TO THU PLANNlNG DEPARTMEN'T.
I FIRE MARs~~LL/FxRE DISTRrCT
A . TxiS PRaPOsA.L. IS vvrTHnN FIRE ~~OTEcTTaN DIsxRrcT NO. ~
I3. ADEQi7ATE ARRANCE1ViENTS TB-M (HAVE P10T) BEEN MAUE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDINC FOR AN ADEQCFA WATER SYS7`EM AND FACILI`MS FOR FIRE
PRO'TEC'I'ION PLIRPOSES.
C. RECOIV1MENDEil FIRE FI..OVsT: OR UNABLF, TO CA1.,CULATF, NO'N
BECAUSE U'SE IS NOT DEFINI'TrVE; AND WII.L BE DE'TERvfLNED AT SUILDING ~ERMIT
API'LICATIDN TXME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
~cW, g4c
FIRE DiSTRICT SI+GNATUREfTI1"LE DA'I'~
~ WAwTER PURVEYOR
A. . 5A'Y'ISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER ANU FIRE Fi.O'UV
REQUIREMENTS (U"X) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENZ'`51CO.MNSElYTS:
WATER DIS'i'RICT SIGNA7UR.EfI`Y'x'LE DATE
GOrJNTY ENGIIVEER
A FRELrMnNARY DrscUssIanr HAs TAKEr~ PLAcE Arr~ ~~~RAL ~QUrREM~NTs FOR RoADs
AIdD DRAiIVAGE HAVE BEEPV DISCUSSED W1'I'H TT3E APPLICANT,
A. CONII1rIEIV"!'S:
~
~
~~~~ATUI~E=E, DA-
COUNTY UTILI'TYES
A PRELTlvFIlNAItY I3ISCUSSION HA LACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMEN'T'S F{]R
5Ug1viITTA.L UF THIS PRUPOSAL (,HAVE (HA'VE NOT) BEEN 5I FfEa. THE DESI~NAT'ED
~VATER PClR1JEYOR FOR THTS S ''~tQ4 W~~ ~''LJO?,,
A. COM1viEN'TS: 5JAS tJt ~ 6L5 i)OUGLO 7-0
lq90fz8ru3 "c Sc.-qjLm -
j: t8 `i 6a.
~
SYGNATURE/i"I'I'i.F, DATE
HEAL'I'H DISTRIGT
A PRELIM]NAR;i' DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAPEANU GENER.AL kEQT]ME1VIGNTS FOR
SZJBMI'TTAL OF THIS PItOPOSAL (HAVE) ~UVE NUT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMME1'dTS:
; u
SrONA E r~~~
~0 pL)$..tC, 5L
~jt~ ~~,,,~~E,~ ~ ~f
A F~GIMIlriARY 1~ISCUSSI(3N HAS TAI.I~6 PLACE AND C~E~TE LTIREiVIEN"T'S FOR THE
PTtOVISIC]N OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE TJNDER.STODD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. CO7v1MENTS: .
STGNATURF.TITLE DA"FE ,
,
. .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
T, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
_SIGNED: 1C Xnw DATE:
/ t1(J f • r
WAsk,~cr~ ADDRESS: 707 Wes t 7th, Su i te 200 PHONE: 458-6840
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99204
~'J • c
16091 w-~ PART IV
~ ,~FC1•- "
sipvq~ ~W(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LE'ITER OF AUTHORIZATIOI~
PIRES 12 08
~,-THE-~ _
~ERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A►FFIR.M THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF. 5(elle- y LA,~c
/ -
NAME: o b G rt.. ~ L, Ile-l-rwA^j DATE:
ADDRESS: N. 8205 Di vi s i on Street pHpNE: 467-2123
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99208
~ /6 z AV-1-- 3/8-9
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
.
aoiwL~ , 1996, B Y ~ ~ •
NOTARY SEAL (:2
. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
~~TeoOFFICIAL SEAL ~ Residing at: S~ODI~ *A-~
PATRICK J. MOORE ,
Notary Public - Washington My appointrnent expires:
My Commission Expires '
_ A`t-irrh 29 1Q98 ~
PART V
(TO BE CO LE D BY THE DMSION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTED: FILE
j, - -if&
DATE ACCEPTED• B y:
TOTAL FEES: RECE 7~ v
~ v
i '
. .
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 1
SPOKIINE ENVIROto1EMTAt ORDI14Al1CE
(YAL 197-I1-960) Section 11`10 230(1)
, .
Env1rom+entel Checkllsc
Ftle ►to
Purpose of Checkllst
The State Enviroroental Vollcy ACt (SEPA) tnapter 43.21C RCW, requires all gover m"ntel aqenCies to COn51Ct► :ie envtr0 nmental 103petis of a OropOSal
before mktng Aettsions. An Environoental Impect Statement (EI5) muit be preQared for all prooosel5 viih p r~aDle signlficant adverse lmpacts on
the Quelity of the enriro m+ent. The purpose of thti cheCkltst ts to provide informatlon to he10 you end the :cency identlfy impacts fron your
proposal (anA to reduce or evoid Inpacts from tht proposal. If it can De done) and to help the aqenty detiae •netAer an EiS is required
lnstructions for Apolicants
This environ.ental checklist asks you to descrlDe sooe basfc Infortoatlon ebouC your proposa4. Governmental aqencies use tnis checlclist to Getermine
whether the environaental impacts of yovr proposal ere slgnlftcant. requiring preDaration of an flS. Ansrer :ne questions Driefly, vith Che most
precise inforaetion knwn. or glve the best descrlptton you cen.
You nust •nswer eith Questton accuretely end cerefully, to the best of your knowledge. In caost cases. you snould Oe eDle to enswer the questions
froe your own observatloni or projett plans vtthout tht need to hire experts. If you rtelly do not knov the ansrer, or tf a puestion Eces not apply
to your proposal. vrlte 'do not Icnw' or 'does not aDD1Y•~ ComDlete anivers to tfie pw st/ons nor mar avotd unnecessery deleys leter
SoQe Questtons ask •bout qovern.ental regulations, such as zoning, shorellnt. end landmerk designations. Ansrer these questtons 1f you can if you
have problcms, the governr.ente) aqencies can assfst you.
The chectllst questions eDDlY to all perts of your proposel. even 1f yw olan to do theis over a oerfod of t1rr. or on dtfferent oarcels of lanE
Attach any edditional Infortoation that vlll descrlbe your proposal or its envlronnental effetts. ihe egency :3 wnicn you su0mlt this checkllst may
ask you to explein your enswers or provfde addtttonei Infor►netlon reasonaDly relsted to deternintng tI there itay Ce signtflcant aaverse imoact
Use of chectlist for nonproject propozals:
Canalete this chetklist for nonDroject proposels. even though questions aay be ensrered 'Ca s not aoD1y'.
IN IIODITIOM. Ca+0lete the SUP9LEMEMTAI SHEET FOR NO'(PROJECT ACTIONS(Vart 0).
For nonDro,K tt ections. the references in the checkllit to tne words 'vrojeCt,' 'a00>>cAnt,' en0 'Droperty or site' should De reed as 'vraoosel,'
'proposer.' and 'affected geograpntc aree,' resoe« lvely.
A. BACKGROUIID
t. 7aoe of proposed project, tf epp11Ca01e' N/A
2. yeme of Applicant ROt?eIt 1.. Aeitman, TT.
7. Address and phone numDer of eppllcant or contact person Landmark Builders, 8205 N. n1V1S10?1 Street
Snokane. WA 99208 ...~~oq- 1167' all.0--11)
1. Oate thecklist preosrtC j4gLCh 15. 1996
~ ~j ~~440'111
S. AgencY requestinq checklist Spokane COLIIty ~)1V1~J,1^ bkO 1J~,~ ~~l~II / 1 f
6. Proposed tloinq or sche0ule (lncludlnq Dheitng, If appllceble). N/ A
1. a. Qo you have •nr plens for fu[ure sddltions, exDanslon, or furtAer ectivtty related to or co m ected ri;- tnts oroDOSaI' If yes, explain
-Nn
b. Oo you own ar heve optlons on lend neerDy or adjacent to thls proposat' If yez. ezp1a1n.-N0
8. list any environmente) info►metlon yau know nbout that nas Deen prepareG, or rill De preparefl, direttly relaced to this ofoDOSeI
..Mane known
aev.2/1/ea I
9POICAfiL CW7ROIML'NTAL ORDINA;tCE
(uAC 197-I1-964) Seccton 1! !n 239(!) ~
♦ BACRCHO4[tD (CORCIRUGd)
9 Do you 1cn w whether •pplieatlon& are pecuftnq tor goverrtneotel •ppfovals o! other prooosale :Srectly affetttno che Pf0pP(t/ rovered M -our
propoeal' !t yee, ecplaln
_No t knQwm
10 l.let •ny government apyrovats or pecmtee tha2 vtll be oeeded for your proposal, tf imo-nt COL1Yltv a"rnVal of ZOile ehange
permits required for buildine commetcial buildinQ.
l! Clve • b A e[, caaplece deocriptton of rw r propo ul, Including the proposed w es and the sIee of the pro)ect end atte --here ere eeveral
quesetona lster in chi• checkltse tfut ask you to deocriDe certaln •spects o[ r wr proposal You do not need to rep u t those anevers on thls
VaBe
Exact uses are unknown at Chis time. Uses will conform with B-3 Zoning which is
beinQ re4uested.
loca[ton ot the proposal Give •uEftctent lntorma[lon (or ♦ person to understand the preclse loc~tion o! vo~r propo~ed p~o)ect, lncluCt^; a
street address, lf any, and section, tornahlp and rangt, tt kno+oe • propoaa1 vould otcur over • rangc of area, provtOe the range or
boundartes o( the elce(s) ProvtAe a leg&l deetrlpclon, sfte plao, vttlnlry mai p, snd topograph~c mAp, if reasonebly evatLable vhile vou
ahould sabutt any plans reQulred by the •gency, vou •re not reQulred to duplleate oaps or de ullcd plans wtaltted wlth anv perntt appllcetton
cela ted to tAls checklts t
Northside of SpraQue Avenue directlv east of Carnine Road. Directly west of Sun Rental
& Elks Lodge.
It a.s in the SW I of the SE Sec. 13. T. 25 N.. R. 44 E.
~ I s- 5 ~
. ~
~3 Doea the proposed ♦ctton lle vlthln the AQu.I(et Sena1[lvt kre• (ASA)' -he Genera! Sever Servlce Acee' -he Ptlortty Sever Service Aree' 'Re
Clt, oi Spokane' (See Spokane County's ASA Overlar 2onc 1t1as for Sound&rtes)
This pronosal lies within the Acpuifer Sensitive area, the Priority Sewer area but
outside the City of Spokane.
'O BE COttP1.E"LD 8Y APPLICANT
8 FFWIRON`(EtMlL C1.DCEYfS
Evalwtlon cor
Agencv l,se On:y
t ° AP-Il
a General descrtption of the si[e (circle one) (l.ae, rolling, htlly, •teep elopee, aoune& tawa,
ocher
Flat
b 'Tec la the s[eepest slope on the stte (app[o:leace percent elope)• 1 - 2%
C 'fhat geoerel types of sotls •re found on the stte (for example, clay, "nd, gravel, peat, ouckl'
!t you knov the claeettlcatlon of agrfeulcural •otls, specify chen •nd note •ny prtoe (analaad
Ge A-Garrison eravellv loam - aravellv, medium-textured
soil.
d #,re there ourface tndtcationa or hietorv of unsu ble wlle ln the tamedlste vtclnltv` I( go,
deatrlbc
No
,
SPOKJIME EMYIRONHENTAL ORDINAHCE
(WAC 197-I1-9601 Sectton 11 10 230(I)
8. ENVIROtNENTAL ELEMENTS(tontinued) • •
Evaluetien For
Aqency Use On1y
e. Oescribe the purpose. type. and epproximate Quentities of eny f1111ng or gredtng proooseG.
Indtcate source of f11t
Sa.te will be devel.oiDed to apnroximatelv existine Qrade.
Excessive fill is not exvecCed as apart of this site.
f Cou1G erosion a a ur as a result of clearing, constructlon, or use' lf so, qenerelly dezcriDe.
No
g. About what pertent of the site will be covered w1th tmpervious surtaces •tter pro}ect construt-
tion (for ezample, asphalt or buildings)"
A larize norCion of this site will be covered with imper-
vious surfaces, as is tVpical of commercial developments.
fi. Proposed measures to reGuce or control erosion. or other iapects to the eerth, 1f any
Frosion will not be_a problem in rela 3.a ro develQg;n
this site.
2. AIR
e. Whet type of enissions to tne e1r woulE result from the proposel (t.e.. Eust. eutor+oClle, odors
industriel, rood smoke) during Construttton and wnen tAe Droject ts conpleted' lf eny,
genernlly describe and give aporoxlmate quentttes 1t knw n.
Dtist mav be eenerated durine construction of the site.
Development will attract automobiles.
b Are there any of(-slte sources of enlislons or odor that may effect your propo u i' If so,
generally CescriDe.
NO
c. ProposeG mensurei to reduce or control emisstons or other linpacts to e1r, 1f any
Normal dust control measures will be taken dutine
construction.
] uarEa
e. Surface
(1) Is there eny surfeCe veter bo0y on or fn the 1mueGle[e vttlnity of the S1te 1nt1uEing year-
round and seasonal streams, seltwater, lakes. poads. wetlendsl' If yes, descrlDe type and
provide names. If eODroprlete, state whet streem or rlrer I[ flows into.
No
(2) uill thc project requtre eny w rk over. tn, or adjecent to (wlthin 200 feet) the descrf0ed
waters'? if yes, please descrtbe and attech avatlable plans.
No
3
SPO[AHL LIQVIR02RRNtAL ORDINAI7GR
('aAC 197-I1-960) Settton ll TO :30(1)
a •
S. errvcROr+xerrseL etMrr.s (conttnuea)
evelu.cton For
Agenty Use Only
(3} Estimate the •ow nt o[ flll •nd dredge macerfal tluc vould be placed ln or removed fros the
wr(ace water or vetland• •nd indtute the •re• of the •tte ttut vwld be ♦ffeece4 lndtute
the source of f(11 oaterlal
N/A
(4) Vill the proposal reQulre •uctacs y ter vl[M ta w 1s or dlvecsloeu' C1 wa general deocrlp-
tton. Durpoee, •nd •ppro:lnate Quan[lcies, t( Icnown.
A"
(S) Does the proposal Lle vithln a 100-yeat (lood p Lia' If •o, note lo ution on the s1ce plao
No
(5) Ooe• the pcopo u 1 tnvolve any diacTu [Ze• of vu te w terlal• co surtsce vacers' 1t 80,
describc the type of vesce and •nttcipated volu m of dlscharge
No .
0 Ground
(1) Vill groundwter Ee vithdn", or vtll wter De discfursed to Sroundwcer' Give genetal
description, purpose, •nd appro:tnate Q w ntltles, Lt knovn
$1ye wa.]_1 be ag_rved bqYera a ~Lter Distr. i_ct.s
Oescribe vu ce naterlal thac vLll be dtschatged Soto the grouod tco+ •epclc tuilea or otlur
•aoitary vute trutseot (aclllty Desctlbe the Qeneral •l:c ot the s7rscm, the numEer ot
housee co be •ecved (1f •pplicable) or the eua ber of perso w the s7sceo(s) •re e:pected to
serve
_SAn3_tarv sewer is aVai.l_able to site and wil,t be used
for all sanitary waste.
(3) DescriDe •ny srsteoi, other thaa those deslgaed tor the dlrpo"l of sanicary waate,
lnotalled (or the purpose of dtschacglag fluld• belov the dtouod surt.ce (locludes sysceo• such
ac those for the dlspoosl o[ sto n vacer or draloage trom tloor draiaa) Oescribe the cype of
syotem, the •oouot of aaterial to be dleposed of cArough the rysceu and the types ot aa[erlals
llkely to De disposed ot (lacludlag macecial• which say eoter the •7sco Laadvsrteutly throuQh
spllls or a■ • resulc of firetlQhtiaj •ccivlcies).
Storm water riin-off wil_1 be treated i.n "208" x)onds be-
fore recharR:ine the aqiiifer.
(4) Vill •ny chmtcal• (especiallr orgaolc •olvenc• or petroleua luals) be atored !o aDove-
ground or undecground •torage ualca! LE so, vhat c79e• •nd puaotftle• of ma[erfals vill be
stored'
No
~
SPC7►.ANL 7xVIHOHKLNT&1. OILDINANCY
(VA:. 197-11-960) Settion 11 10 230(1)
g L7iVIROtMETiTAL B1.TJSYJR'S (conclnued)
4 ' £valuatlon For
Aget+cq Uee Only
(5) Whac protectlve measuree vt11 be taken co lrtsure that leak• or splll• of •ny chemicals
ctored or vsed on stce will not De •lloved to percolsce to groundwnter (thls includeki oeesuree
to keep cheolcalo out o( dlaposal eyareoa deacrlbed tn lb(I) snd 3b(3)'
NlA
c vatet Runof( (lncludlag stoeo wter)
(1) Desttlbe the soucce of tuooft (Sncludlag sto n vacer) aed mettiod ot collection and 4lspo"l
I( 4ny (lntludc quantlcles, 1t knorc►) Vhece will thls water flov• V111 [h1s wacer (lov lnco
ocher watera' It so, descrlbc
Storm Water will be trated in "208" ponds ner Countv
Standards. T'his water will be collected from the imper-
vi_ous areas of the site and flow into the "2Q$" po nds
before recharginQ the aquifer.
(2) :Jill Aer cAenltals De stored, handled or used oo the site tn a lou tlon vhere a•pill or
leaY will drain co •urface or groundvaiar or to ••coca vater dlspoaal sysC m dlaeharging to
wrtace or grounAvster'
No
(3) Could vsete a&terlals enter ground or surtace y ters' If no, genarally describe
No
d Proposed measure• to rcduce or contcol surtace, ground, snd runott vater tapacts, lt •ny (!t
t the proposed actlon lie• wtthln the Aqulfer Sonattlve Araa De •rpetially C1uC oo t:plaaAtions
r relatlag co tae111t1e• conceralna Sactions ]b(4), ]D(S), aod 3c(2) of tA!• cM ckllrt).
Standards Storm Water run-off Dractices wa.]_1 be followed
to contro]_ water recharQe to aQua,fer.
o vuvrs
a rheck or clrcle type o( vegstatlon (ound on the slte
deciduow tree alder, maple, aopen, other
evergreen tree (tc, cedisr, pine, otAer
:hrubs
X rage
pu[ure
crop or gcato
vet sotl plants, cacull, buttercup, bullrush, •kunk tabbage, otfu r
w ter plant• water lllly, eelgrass, •llfoll, othe[
other c7Des of vegetarlon
b. What klnd and uount of vegncatton will be removed ot altered" All existine
vegetation, whi.ch consists of weeds, will be destroved.
c Llsc thru cened or endangered •pecie• Scaovo co be on pr nea< <he •ice N one "
~
(1~) ' ,l ~ ~•1 VI ~1
d Proposed landscaping, we o[ w tive p L oce, or oclu rsesrures co pcerecve oc enhance vagetatlon 1 ~
on ERe •ite, L( •ny• • p ru~Q(~
`~)~1 1
Tradition~ landscapine wil]_ be iised as nart of develoDing
this site. ~1►4.11A-t -t-]
~
J ~ '
~ SPOKAME ENYIROfMEHTAI ORDINA,YCE
f11AC 197-II-9601 Settsor. 1.0 230( 1;
8. EMVIROrtMENTAL £LEMEtfTS (continued)
Evaluetton fpr
Aqency Use Only
5 Ar+IwALS
a CirCle any DirdS end antmals whiCh have been Observed on or neer the Site or are kn a.n to ce in
or f1Cdr ene stte
birds hOVk, neron, eegle, songoirds, otner $ On g)7 T d S
mimnals aeer. Deer, el►., Deaver, otner $IIIa1 1 ro d en t s
f isn bess, salmon, trout, herring, snellflsh, other N/ A
other N /A
C Llst eny threatened or endengerM sDeties knorn to be on or neer the slte
None Known
~
j
uclkl~
c ls tne site part of a migration route' ii so, explaln No ao (~a vroposed neesures ta oreserve or enhence wildltfe, 1f any
5 ENERGY AND vATURAI RESOURCES
a what kinds of entrqy (electriC, naturel gas, vood stove, solar) will be used to meet tne
cne comoieted oro)ect's energy needs' Describe tehether tt rt11 be used for neettnq, nu nufec-
tunng, etC
E1_ectricity and/or natural gas raill be used to heat and
light this facility.
q ►tould your project affeCt tne Dotent/el use af zoler enerqy by edJatent Droperttes' 19 sc,
generally descriDe '
No
~ .
c Wnet ►inds of energy tonservetion feecures are includeC tn the plans of tnts orocosel' ist //11 '1
other proOOSeG ~+eesures to reduce or control energy Impacts. If eny ~,Ln ,~~t 11 U
!vo-
Heat loss f rom Uuilding will be minimized through the L~, h,
use of insulation. Ck 2
7 ENVIRONHEHTAL HEALTH
a Are there eny envtrorxoente) heeltn nazerds, lntluding eicposure to taclc chemicals, rist of flre
end explosion, spill, or ne:erdous raste, that Could otcur es e result of tnis proposel' :f so.
destribe
No
(1) Oescribe speciel enerqency servlces thet mtqht be reQuired
No snecial emereencv services will be reQuired.
6
. ~ (
11AG 191-11-960) Seccfon 11 10 230(l) 9POIGANL P.NVIHOtMLN'LAL OQDIvAtiCL
8. Q`tV I FO NHMAL LlI?Q2rTS (c on c i nue d) t •
Evalwtlon For
Agency Uae Only
EIIYSROftlS1{'N. NE7.L'H (cootlnued)
(2) Proposed oeasuces to reduce or cootrol aovlrocmeata.l health Fuasrds, if aoy
N/A .
~ r
b Notee
(1) uhat types of ooiac eYtat lo the •ru vhlch aa7 ♦ffeet 7our project (tor a=a.pls trattic,
equlpoent, operatlon, ochet'
~ /
None known
~ uti~
, ~
a~•
(2) What [ypes &od levels of notae would be creactd try or a aoelatad vitr the pro)ect oo a
shocc-cern or a loc~-carm basl• (!or ezanple. cratEic, coNCrucclon, opecatloo, other)' Iodlcace ~f ,f-v
vhat hour• nolse vould cose (ro■ the slte J
Project will create a small overall increase in traffic
noise.
(3) Propoaed oeasure to ceducc or controi noise topacts, !f say• Buf f e r in Q Wl 1 1
be a nart of this develonment for the surtoiindine
resi.dential areas. Ttii_s bufferine wil.l reduce the noise
from Chis proposal.
8 L►•7D AND SHORELI'IE USE
a vhat 1o the curccat use o( the •ice and •dyacent ptopertleal S 1 t e 1 S eur r en t ly
vacant. Land along SpraRue is business, land north of
that is residential.
b l4• thc alte been used tor •griculture• if •o, deacrlbe NO evidenee of
aericulturat use.
c Oeacclbe any stcuctures on the slte N/ A
d VS11 •ny seructurea be desoltshed' I( •o, vhich' NO
e Whac to the current sooing c Le4tileacloo of tAe sitetlQ-L
t vTac ls the currenc cmprehenalve plao desiggution of the •lte' MajQr commereial
g I[ appltcable, wtut ta thc currenc •horellne wascer progcaa deslgnation of the s1Ce' N/ A
h Naa •ny part of clx •1te Eean clasalfled •s •o 'eoritomw atally Nsuitive' •resi If so,
specity
No
i Appro:lnately hor eaoy people vould reside or vock in che eawpleced projset' NO r e s id en e e s,
20-50 e=lo.vees would work here.
7
• • ' SlORANL GNYI4UHMEN'ikL ORDIIlAAC[
(uAt 197-11-960) Sectloo 11 YO 230(1)
E CNVIROtt!¢RTil ELZMZNTS (coutiaund)
_velwtloo For
Agenc7 Usc Only
~ Approxloa[ely hov aaoy people vould the coopleced projecc dlsp Ltel N on e
k PCOposed eu suCe• Co •vold or [educe dlsplac meot tupacts, any N/A
1 Proposed measures to enaure the pcoposal i• coapacible vith e:istin= •od pro3ecced L nd wes aod i
plans, 1( any.
Q ( ca-1
~cj
Areas surroundinR this site which front on Spr.ague are
-e J J 1
alreadv zoned B-3.
1> -
9 HOUSING
• Approxlnacely hw uny unlts vwld Oe provided, 1[ anyT Iodicat• vFrttur hlgh-, alddle-, or aAlt
/ 0 Q n
lov-lncooe howing
None ~ ,Q [f L C
b Approsloacely hov aany uatts, !t •ny, vould be cllaloatedT indluce whst M r hiph-, alddle-, or
lov-incooe housing.
None
c ProposeA 9easura• to cedute or control housleg lmpac u, lf •oy.
N/A
10 AESTIIETICS
• What i• the [allest Aeight ot •ey proposed •truc wre(e), ooc tacluding •etoma@ 2 VTut 1• the prlnclpal excertor bullding v tecial(s) ptoposed' J7J Ck I~, 1( IJ
t
Size and shane of buildine wi]_1 conform to A-3 zoninQ htlfk_J 1v (~,~h~~~1V•~ 1 S
renuirements. No extera.or building material_s have j r Or
been selecte d at t his time. P"
1 l.l , ll' ~Ir~
b Vh&t v1evs In the immcdi&te vicinity vould De alucad or obscrvctedt No aesthetie ~ 1~~~
views are available in this area. P`
' -
iv -
c Propoeed seasures co reduce or control aest M tlc iapac[s, lf •oy. N/ A
ti Lic►i- Ar+u cuRE (r
• '►tut trDe of llsht or gLre vill the proposal produceT 'llut tise of day Mould tt ulnly occur'
I.ighting of the parkine lot is anticinated.
b Could light or slare troe the flnished projecc be • satety haurC or lncertsre vlth •levst
c
No
c 1Jhac eatstiag oU-site swrce• ot llght or gLre may •ttcct your proposal'
Norne known o
. Q~,1~ • L~1
d Propoeed aeasures to ceduce ot control llghc •ad glare tepacts, it aoy.
Nane necessarv ~
8
• ~ ~ SPOLAFE CFVIRdlMSNiAL ORDIHANC'E
(vhC 197-11-a60) Sectfon 11, 10 230(1)
D LNV1ROIa(LlffAL 0.!?ENTS (contlnwd) ~
' Evsluatlon Fqf
Agenty Uee Only
12 iIECREATiON
• Uhot designated •ud lofocaul recreaclonAl opportunltles •re ln the iaaedlate vicinity'
None
E Would the proposed project dlspl.ace •ny eztscing reereAtfonal use@' l! •o, describe
No
c Propoied oeasure• to reducs or control 1apatts oo [ecreatlon. lpcluding recreaclotil opportuof-
tle• co be provided try the projeet or •pplicane, if •ny
N/A
13 NIS'OR1G AND GULTURAL PRLSCRYA'ION
a Ace chere an7 places or objects llsied on or proposed (or natloctil, scace or local preserva-
tton regisu r• knovm to De oa oc ne:t to the s1te7 It so, aeners,lly dcstrtDe
No
b Genecally descrlbs •ay 14nd w rke or evldence of hlrtoric •rchaeologtcal, sci:ocilic or culeural
lmportance kn wn to be oe or ne:t to the stcc
None knowp
c Proposed ouwre• to reduce or concrol tapaus, lt •ny.
N/A
14 :r.AusPOrt-eTtox
• Identi(y publtc atceet• •nd Ai6hvay• •srving the •lte •nd descrlDe pcopused accet• to t
e:isting •creet systea Shoron stte plaw, tt •ny OTl $lte Dlans ROt availa~le
at this time. Snrague Avenue will sezve as the primary
access to thxs site. Carnine may be used as a secondary
access.
b 1• •ite tucrently •ee~rad Dy public traasit' 1[ not, wTwt t~ the • Qproalnlte disu nce to the
ne.re.c Ec•wic .copt yes, ~ll1S service 1S avail.adl.e OIl Spraeue Ave.
c Tlov uny parleltsg •paces vould the compleLed projeec have' tlov uay would the projett elttinAte'
ThP ntimher of parking pla _es will meQt Countv Codes for
ii7 timaCe uGe _
No narkine is currently avail.able on site.
d klll the proposal reQui[e an7 oev rw d• or •treet*, or ioprovamnu to aclsting coads or SEreets
not includlng drivevaysT I( so, seaerally describe (lodi u te whetFar puDllc or prlvate)
Additiona7_ rieht of vav dedication and paving may be
re4uired on Carnine.
e vill the projact use (or occur to the lmxwdlate riclnlcy ot) iescer, ratl, or air traompor[atton'
i[ so, generally descrtEe
No
9
. (vt~C . 197-11-960) Sect~ioo 11 10 230(1) SPOfAHE QfPIQfkiltLNLAl. OflDI11ANCL
E. eRVIROt@KTN'!AL CLQSPRTS (coatlnwd)
Cvaluatton For
Ageocy Use Onlr
( Nov oany vehlcular Cclp• pec day vould be geoeraced by the t mpleted projett' lE lmovn,
tndlcace vheo peak vould occur
Use has not heen indentified, howeverT no uses nermitted
under B-3 which are not permitted under B-2 are hi.gh traffic
generators. durine neak hour of adiacent atreet.
g Proposed oeasure• to reduce ac eentcol transporcatiaa iapaecs, it •a7:
Bus sezvice is avail.able for both emplayees and customers
of facility.
15. PUBLIC SERViCCS
a 'Jauld che projecc [esult la •o locrassed wed for public •ecvtce• (tor esiryla, tire proteccioe,
pollte protecttoo, ha&lch care, schools, other)i lt so. Senecally deecribe.
A slieht increase in need for fire & nolice protection
will result as a part of this development.
E ProposeE oeasurc• co reduce or coatrol direcc ispacc• on public •ervicas, 1o •ny:
Increased tax base wi.ll offset needed increase in services.
lb IJ-ILMES
a Ctrcle uc~,13_1!!_.c,urrentl~.awllakle at the •ite C~ctricity iatursl Qo ~wEer~e[use,
•ervlce,(telephon!) (a'aoftary •ewC) saptit systss, otMr
b Deecrlbe the utilltle• ttut at• propomed [or tAe project, the ucllity providin6 t M se nice •ad
the oeneral corucevccioa aectrltias oe the •lte or to the lawdlst• riclnitr vhieh d ght De
needed
Utilities tvpical of commercial development will be
needed as a part of this development.
C SIGNATOAE
l, the underslgned, aveir ueder the peMlt) ot perjun ttut the •Lovs respoorss •re vd• tncAtully and to the bsat ot •y knwledge. I alw
undecscaod chac, should there De •oy w111tu1 aiarepreseocacloo or villfu! Lck of lull disclosure oo sy pore, the •Renc7 aay vtchdrav •ey
dececainacion ot nocuignificaoce that !t aisht lssue ln reliaoce upoo chis ehecklisc.
Oate Propooeoc / l~ Je Ii. / L• e/T aN H'YL ~
(Pleue Priot or Type)
~l - / , ~ • ~
froponen2: tJ Address. O Z 0 L) clvN
~
(Sigoatuce)
Phone • -J L 7 ~ Z1 Z~
Persoa coopleting toto. L Da[e:
Phone ~~~~q LV
POR S7AlY USL OHLT
Staff vemDer(a) revieving checkllat: V`-
ed on thi• scatt revtev o[ the eovlconaeotal elucklis[ and ot M r pertlenac to(oeaa[Soo, the •tatf.
A. ~ Coacludn• that chere •Te no probaDle si`aifl u at •dverse lapact• •nd reemeod• a deteet►loation ol oonsisoifitaote
S. Concludas ctut probable •iQniflcaat advarse eavi mnoental imp&ct• do esist tor the curteat proposal and recoaoend• a siclgated decer-
atoatlon o( uonsigoiflcante vlth cooditiocv.
C. Concludes clut there •re probable •ignifiu ac •dverse eevirommental tmpucs aod ree meod• a dotecstoactoo o[ atgoiticaoce
[ILIl1C [IM - 975.00
10
zv.:zq.96
"
a
- ~Z'~- ~ i'L~►
~
. t
~•RE _ Y il~
' cio • ' ~ g~ E ~ .
~ . o
1~ QG E- ~ • ~ 1
1r4C 6 . . t
~ K
A.~ E • ~ 3 ~ - ;
, t apt► fl.~' J~''r ..►4 , ~ ~ ~
.
CD
tQtion
► v = ~
{ ~fj,'~Ij~~ • '~~..r 1` ~,f ! ~ • {
f
~ ~ ~ p.1._ ~ , ► Q'tn J
1 M~►t~+ = r G E~
Qc
w
~
•MA~ ~ r ~i~r r`r~.~ ' ~ r • /
f f n, . ► ~ .
' V
1
sr P
- ( lwd
~ ~ . ~ T ~ , F
A Y -
.
, ~ . • A
BR,O~0E9
N.
ELLEY ,
/ AK~ + ~.v~.• -
f~~~.~0~'~~..•`• ~ 1',4' . I
• ~f
~{':e.~ : .
~
- .
~ ~ ':7~. ~ .
:7!T~..' f~ 1
• ~r:.~.; ~
V• • ~
, , . , .
•~'N ~ •
~ w
Q ~ Z1H qVE .
a~ .
« 4a,
■
` W ?
\
~ ~ •
. ,
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONES
TO: Spokane County Planning Department
' FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads`ax
DATE: 09/17/96
PROJECT: B-2 to 8-3 Heitman - Carnine Commercial
FILE ZE-029-96 / (DRZE-183-96)
Hearing/Review Date: September 25, 1996
Sponsor/Applicant: Buster Heitman
Section Township Range: 13-25-44
Planner: Louis Webster
Design/Review Date: (April 3, 1996 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
apprpved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing
to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the
formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate
in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to
Sprague Avenue, Main Avenue.
5 As an aiternative method of constructing the road improvements stated
herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and
participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost
of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Sprague Avenue
and Main Avenue.
CC: Applicant Buster Heitman
Engineer/Surveyor Patrick Mvore
' Page 2 . .
September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
~ ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
6 The -construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7 The County Engineer has designated a Special Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the installation of varying amounts of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be cor.structed.
8 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of Main Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet
of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
9 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer.
10 Access to Carnine and Main Avenue shall be prohibited until such time
as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer.
11 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
12 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
13 No construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is
to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in
an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of
. construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer.
14 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following:
' Page 3
September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
- ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
~
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in
consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do
for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the
above described pz•operty in a Road Improvement District (RID) and
to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for
improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and
authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW
36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast
their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution
method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest
against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43
RCW.
If a RiD is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described
below, said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree: (1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
are fEasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and
expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within
the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the
right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements
called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the
petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal
to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided
further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to
. the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the
property.
It is fuz-ther acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by
Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole
expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the
improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten
(10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is
applicable to Main Avenue and Sprague Avenue.
15 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a Principal
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not
consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the
Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required
right of way dedication, a strip of property 10 feet in width along
• the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property
may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
' Page 4 .
September 25, 1996 April 3, 1996
ZE-029-96 DRZE-183-96
r
• 16 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
17 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
18 A traffic analysis has been done for this land use proposal. Based on
information from the study, a traffic signal shall be constructed by
the applicant at Conklin and Sprague Avenue. Spokane County will be
improving Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road
beginning in the spring of 1998. The applicant shall construct the
signal concurrently with this construction. The Shelley Lake Estates
a plat approved south of Sprague Avenue also has the responsibility to
construct a traffic signal at Conklin Road. Based on information in
the study warrants are now being met at this intersection if any new
final plats are done for this plat it would be the developers
responsibility to construct the signal. Should the applicant move
ahead to seek a building permit for this commercial rezone adequate
surety shall be provided to insure the construction of the
signalization.
_
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIIVEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- ZONE CHANGE -
TO: Spakane County Planning Department, Lorne Lakshas
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard s~
DATE: April 3, 1996
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # DRZE-183-96 / HEITMAN, BUSTER
The following comments for the above referenced zone change are submitted to
the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review
Meeting scheduled April 3, 1995.
SPECIAL CONDITION: In order to deem this application "Counter Cornplete", additional
information is required. The applicant shall submit a traffic analysis for acceptance by the
County Engineer prior to this item being placed on a public hearing agenda.
~ .
~ . ~ .
~
f
S P O K/k N E C O V N'T' Y
•
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORICS DEPARTMErIT
JAytES L MANSON, C B O, D112ECTOR DENNIS M SCOTT, P E, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recrearion Department
Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Valley School District
Vera Irrigation District
Fire District No. 1
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
~
DATE: March 20, 1996
C
RE: Zone Reclassification from Community Business (B-2) to Regional
Business (B-3)
APPLICATIQN A('(;F,PTAN-CE AND 12ESI(''N REVIE)Y-MEETING
APRIL &3996 AT 2d5
COi1NTY PLANNINC CnNFERENC'E RnnM. 2ND FLnnR
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCL-1'TANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETIlVG FORM for your comments. The Division of Build i ng and
Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and represelitative have
been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your revicw comments on
the attached form to Lorne Lakshas for the meering. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring lhr~g copies to the
meeting). Thanks for your cooperarion. If you have any questions about the application,
please contact Lorne Lakshas of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205.
c: Buster Heitman, 8205 North Division, Spokane, WA 99208
Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Si[e Plan
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
Burt,DtNGI'xoNE (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
PLaNtvtNGPHOtvE (509) 456-2205 • FAx (509) 456-2243
TT1T1 /CA!1\ nnA n~1
Design Review for Apri13, 1996 at 2:15
Zone Reclassification from Community Business (B-2) to Regional
Business (B-3)
Generally located north of Sprague Avenue and east of Carnine Road in the
SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Major Commercial and within the Priority
S ewer S ervice Area (PS S A)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Community
Business (B-2) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed in the
Regional Business (B-3) zone.
PARCEL rTUMBER: 45134.1557
SITE SIZE: Approximately 9.69 acres
APPLICANT: Buster Heitman
8205 North Division
Spokane, WA 99208
(509) 467-2123
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Lorne Lakshas
PAGE 1 . . 11:14:46 26 MAR 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
00764 CARNINE CT (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
CARNINE CT (END) 00.120 22ND AVE U 19 PAVED 40
00714 CARNINE RD (START) 00.000 SPRAGUE AV U 19 GRAVEL 14
CARNINE RD 00.060 RIVERSIDE AV (END) U 19 GRAVEL 14
CAR.NINE RD ( END ) 00.120 MAIN AV ( END ) U 19 GR.AVEL 14
2 Records Processed
PAGE 1 . . 11:13:06 26 MAR 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
04538 SPR.AGUE AV (START) 00.000 HAVANA ST & SPOKANE U 14 PAVED 48
SPRAGUE AV 00.120 DEARBORN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.250 CUSTER RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 62
00.500 CARNAHAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 60
00.710 MCKINNON ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
00.840 HOWE ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
01.000 FANCHER RD U 14 PAVED 68
01.310 DYER RD ( STAR.T ) U 14 PAVED 68
01.380 DOLLAR RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.430 DAVID ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.510 THIERMAN ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.560 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.620 BRADLEY RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.680 DOR.A ST ( END ) U 14 PAVED 82
01.750 COLEMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
01.890 GIRARD RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.000 PARK RD U 14 PAVED 82
SPR.AGUE AVE 02.440 VISTA RD & LEWIS RD U 14 PAVED 76
SPRAGUE AV 02.560 SIPPLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 76
02.590 BESSIE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 76
02.710 SARGENT RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.750 DALE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.860 DISHMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
02.900 BR 4594 UNDERPASS FO U 14 PAVED 70
02.990 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 14 PAVED 70
03.060 DISHMAN-MICA RD (END U 14 PAVED 80
03.120 WILLOW RD U 14 PAVED 80
03.240 LOCUST RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82
03.370 FARR RD U 14 PAVED 82
03.460 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 14 PAVED 82
03.550 WALNUT RD U 14 PAVED 82
03.620 HERALD RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82
03.650 DARTMOUTH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
03.760 FELTS RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
03.800 BALFOUR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
03.870 RAYMOND RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
03.990 UNIVERSITY RD U 14 PAVED 88
04.180 GILLIS RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.280 MOFFITT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.370 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.510 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 88
04.680 FOX RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 88
04.750 UNION RD (END) U 14 PAVED 76
04.810 PERRINE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
04.870 ROBIE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
05.000 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 14 PAVED 88
05.110 HOUK RD (END) U 14 PAVED 86
05.130 HOUK RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
05.520 MCDONALD RD U 14 PAVED 86
05.580 CLINTON RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
05.660 MCCABE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
05.760 BLAKE RD U 14 PAVED 86
05.850 MAYHEW RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
06.010 EVERGREEN RD U 14 PAVED 86
06.110 BOLIVAR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
PAGE 2 , . 11:13:08 26 MAR 1996
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
06.180 BANNEN RD (START) U 14 PAVED 86
06.300 BEST RD (END) U 14 PAVED 86
06.510 ADAMS RD U 14 PAVED 86
06.760 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 86
07.030 SULLIVAN RD U 14 PAVED 86
07.510 CONKLIN RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
07.640 CARNINE RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
07.910 STEEN RD (END) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.030 FLORA RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
08.220 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
SPRAGUE AVE 08.270 APPLEWAY AVE & TSCHI U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
SPR.AGUE AV 08.340 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.440 MANIFOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.540 LONG RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.630 ARTIES CT (START) U 16 PAVED 20
08.680 MOEN ST (END) U 16 PAVED 20
08.770 GREENACRES RD U 16 PAVED 20
09.040 BARKER RD U 16 PAVED 20
09.180 HARMONY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
09.390 HOLIDAY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
09.530 HODGES RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
SPRAGUE AVE 09.980 GLENBROOK ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20
SPRAGUE AVE (END) 10.050 HENRY RD U 17 PAVED 20
04621 SPRAGUE AV (START) 00.000 IDAHO RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
SPRAGUE AV (END) 00.150 IDAHO STATE LINE R 09 GR.AVEL 18
04540 SPR.AGUE AVE (LIBERTY 00.000 LIBERTY LAKE RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPR.AGUE AV (LIBERTY 00.050 BR 5507 LIBERTY LAKE R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.080 MCKINZIE DR (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.140 GARRY DR (LIBERTY LA R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.310 WRIGHT BV (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.420 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.480 WARD RD (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.630 CLUBHOUSE RD (LIBERT R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.800 HILLVIEW RD (LIBERTY R OS LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.990 OVERLOOK RD (LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
01.110 GAGE ST (LIBERTY LAK R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04845 SPRAGUE AVE (START) 00.000 TSCHIRLEY RD U 19 PAVED 30
TSCHIRLEY RD (END) 00.090 SPRAGUE AV U 19 PAVED 30
04537 SPRAGUE RD (START) 00.000 WEST END AT LINCOLN R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
SPR.AGUE RD 01.010 STROUP RD R 09 GR.ADED/DRAINED 10
02.000 COULEE HITE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
03.040 LADD RD ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 18
03.660 RR TRACKS R 09 GR.AVEL 18
04.040 WOOD RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04.930 U.S. ARMY PERSUINT S R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPRAGUE RD (END) 05.040 RITCHEY RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
5 Records Processed
Traf f ic Counts.
Road Name Location.................... Leg Count...
SPRAGUE AV at FANCHER RD E 21824
SPRAGUE AV at FANCHER RD W 22250
S PRAGUE AV a t DOLLAR. RD ( END ) E 2 9 4 0 5
SPRAGUE AV at DOLLAR RD (END) W 33611
SPRAGUE AV at THIERMAN ST (END) E 27091
SPR.AGUE AV at THIERMAN ST (END) W 34555
SPR.AGUE AV at PARK RD E 31843
SPRAGUE AV at PARK RD W 30029
SPRAGUE AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH E 25530
SPR.AGUE AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH W 34623
SPRAGUE AV at DISHMAN-MICA RD (END) E 27800
SPRAGUE AV at DISHMAN-MICA RD (END) W 12904
S PR.AGUE AV 105 f t E o f FARR RD E 29514
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft E of FARR RD W 24773
SPRAGUE AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 24798
SPRAGUE AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 23381
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BOWDISH RD E 31079
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BOWDISH RD W 26207
SPR.AGUE AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) E 26778
SPR.AGUE AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) W 19612
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of MCDONALD RD E 20614
SPR.AGUE AV 105 ft W of MCDONALD RD W 21573
SPRAGUE AV at EVERGREEN RD E 17980
SPRAGUE AV at EVERGREEN RD W 16982
SPRAGUE AV at ADAMS RD E 15650
SPR.AGUE AV at ADAMS RD W 17355
SPR.AGUE AV 105 ft W of SULLIVAN RD E 19850
SPR.AGUE AV 105 ft W of SULLIVAN RD W 13317
SPRAGUE AV at FLORA RD E 12182
S PR.AGUE AV at FLOR.A RD W 12979
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BARKER RD E 02279
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BARKER RD W 02060
SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) E 3801
SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) W 2413
SPR.AGUE AV (START) at HAVANA ST E 17130
SPR.AGUE AVE at VISTA RD E 39077
SPRAGUE AVE at APPLEWAY AVE E 03650
SPRAGUE AVE (END) at HENRY RD VJ 1705
SPRAGUE AVE (LIBERTY LAKE) at LIBERTY LAKE RD E 2908
SPRAGUE RD at RR TR.ACKS E 18
SPRAGUE RD at WOOD RD W 13
.
.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE: B u s t e r H e i tm a n, L a n d m a r k B u i 1 d e r s
MAII,ING ADDRESS: 8205 N. Di vi s i on Street
CITy: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99208
PHONE: 4 6 7- 212 3 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN O'WNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAII,ING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 9.69 Acres
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) N o n e
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45134.1557
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED N/A
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL None
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B- 2
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY V a c a n t
PROPOSED ZONING B - 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Ma,lor Commerci al
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Val 1 ev
FIRE DISTRICT N o. 1
WATER PURVEYOR V e r a
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifanuly dwellings
Manufactured homes Business M Industrial Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PL,P►NNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
No Zoning Action since 1942
B. LEGALlZON~ RFCLASfiIFICATI()N INF()RMATION:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: North of Spraque Ave., East of Carni ne Road
SECTION 13 TOWNSHIP 25 R.ANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Spraque Avenue and Carni ne Road
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 1280' ±
ZOIVL RECLA►SSIFICA7"'-'N APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED A.RTERIALXx) YES O NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Sprdque Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
Tract 14 of Vera accordina to the plat recorded in Book "0" of Plats,
_Paae 30, in t ne Countv Auditor's Office, Spokane Countv, State
of Washinaton; EXCEPT the North 25.00 feet thereof: ALSO EXCEPTING
Riaht of Wav as deeded for SpraQUe Avenue
EXISTING ZONE(S) 6-2 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ B-3
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW. ,
Same as Above
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _---,./A
ti .
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITTONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MA.KE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Ad,iacent properti es have been rezoned to B-3.
This rezone will match zoninq in the surrounding area particularly along
the Spraque Avenue Corridor.
WHAT IMPACT WII,L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON TFE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? The zone chan4e from B-2 to B-3 will result in few impacts to adjacent
properties. What few impacts there will•be, will be mitiqated usinq bufferinq and
screening methods in accordance with County Standards between this site and surrounding
residential areas.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? Comqrehens i ve P1 an supports th i s
rezonP Si, ' Pct proppr.t,y meets the psdr o{se. and i ntent of the B-3 zone per Secti on
14.628..100of the Zonina Code. Adiacer~t Droperties have received Zone upqrades.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROFOSE TO MITIGATE YOLIR PROPOSAL'S IMPACTO-N
SURROLJNDING LAND USE? Bufferi ng between thi s si te and the UR-3.5 si te to the
to the north will be required as part of any B-3 use of this property. The buffering
will meet County Standards.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIL I,~PPLIC.ATION, Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF'CHE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTTFIED. RESULTS OF T'HE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATI4N SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRTCT NO. /
B. ADEQUATE A►RRANGEMENTS T~) (HAYE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUA WATER SYSTEM AND FACII.TTIES FOR FgZE
PROTEC'I'ION PURPOSES. --t a
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
A.PPLICATION T'IME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
sC-F PfJ r-4'6
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURECITITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY A►RRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQLTIREMENTS (IjiVM) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMF.NTSJCOMMENTS:
C~
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH T'HE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
. >
, al
SIGNATUI&lTITLE 4DA
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCU5SION HAS-T-*KEN,~LACE AND GErfERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSALQ (HAVE)i (HAVE NOT) BEEN S~T13SFIED. 'I~ DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SI7'EIS~ L~.i~
A COMNENT$: C~I -((f (--'f L L-- ~.t..'UjL t~. rLLli 07) C.c.j z 7ec,'), L) G
1
►c
~ SIGNAT'URFITITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
~•iD;r.RY DLSCL:SSIOti H.A.S TAKEti PLA GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
rJI' 7H.5 PP.~~~Sr.L (HAVE) (iAVE~~ NOT)~ BEEN SATISFIED.
~
~ ;;~,r~.~;:, i,:-~ - i,.j ,
~ • , ' ~ / . / ~ I ~ ~ ~I
r'' ; A~: "f'r E LA7
5Ey~Ek,YC;kVEYOk ,
. - : - _ ~ r,. ~ _ _ • -~i~ / _ l. ; / . , j . ~ ~~G
.~.rn;.=;~'! DE ►.:SSIG'~ K-'-S TAYEti PLACE A.tiD GEtiERAL RF.~UIREMENTS FOR THE
?I-:BLIC SE%7ER r.kE [.:NDEkSTGOD BY T-HE APPLICAIr'T.
~ ~ ~~~~•r.Y..''Tj
SIG?v'ATURFlI"ITLE DATE
. •
. , , .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION 't Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONIIVG MAP AND WR;ITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
n
- SIGNED: DATE:
~,,r J• . ~
F wASk o~ ; ADDRESS: 707 West 7th` Sui te 200
o PHONE: 458 6840
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99204
~ - .
~
, 809 1 PART IV
sip F~s~(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
aL
IES 12 08
ERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE A.BOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A,FFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WR:[TTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY Al:~TIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHAI.F.
1~2
NAME: o bc n- ~ Lf~Gl TiN A^,d DATE:
ADDRESS: N. 8205 Di vi s i on Street pHpNE: 467-2123
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99208
~ ~
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR A,FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
.
1996, BY ~ ~ Q,r•~
ti OTARY SEAi,
tit4z-a;i Public in and for the St.a,te of Washington
~ ,v ' "4~ ,t,_'~~~ i p ~ ~,R.
r`~ ~"'~1 I .,1 , 4/i _l. %i: , ~ ~Y►~- r^---~'. ~ ~ .:...i: ~/9 ~
Wi ,
+i
PaRT v
rIG BE C(7MnETID BY TI-E DIVISION OF BUILDIIrTG AND PLANNING)
_Z7, B!.fZI"TID: FILE
: • B Y:
'J'" =.1 FEES; RECEIPT
a ~
~
.
, • .
. .
r ,
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC1N APPLICATION
, PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATIQN:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: B u s t e r H e i tma n, L a n dma r k 6 u i 1 d e r s
MAILING ADDRESS: 8205 N. Di vi si on Street
CITY: Spokane STATE: wa ZIP: 99208
PHONE: 467-2123 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 9.69 Acres
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) None
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45134.1557
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED N/A
STREET A.DDRESS OF PROPOSAL N o n e
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B- 2
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY V a c a n t
PROPOSED ZONING B - 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Md,j o r Comme rc i a 1
SCHOOL DISTRICT C e n t r a 1 V a 11 e v
FIRE DISTRICT N o. 1
WATER PURVEYOR V e r a
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single fanuly dwellings Duplexes Mulcifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes O Business (Xl Industrial O Mixed Use O
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS LNVQLVING THIS PROPERTY:
No Zoning Action since 1942
B . LEGAVZQNE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION;
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: North of Spraque Ave., East of Carni ne Road
SECTION 13 TOWNSHg' 25 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCE5S: Sqraque Avenue and Carni ne Road
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 1280'
1 ~
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICA 71. i1 APPLICATIU'_~1, - Page 2 of 4
,
DOES THE PROPOSAi, HAVE ACCESS TO A,N ARTERIAL OR PLANNED A.RTERIALXx) YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIA.L ROADS Spraque Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
Tract 14 of Vera accordina to the plat recorded in Book "0" of Plats,
-2-aae 30. in the Saokane Countv Auditor's Office. Saokane Countv. State
of Washinaton: EXUPT the North 25.00 feet thereof: ALSO EXCEPTING
Ripht of Wav as deeded for Spraaue Avenue
EXISTING ZONE(S) B-2 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ Q-3
FOR THE FOLLUWING DESCRD3ED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STANMED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW. .
Same as Above
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, tiVHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _ NZA
WHAT AR.E THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Ad.iacent properti es have been rezoned to B-3.
This rezone will match zoninq in the surrounding area particularly along
the Spraque Avenue Corridor.
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON T'HE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? The zone chanqe from 6-2 to B-3 will result in few impacts to adjacent
properties. What few imqacts there will•be, will be mitiqated usinq bufferinq and
screening methods in accordance with County Standards between this site and surrounding
residential areas.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? Comprehens i ve Pl an supports th i s
rezone- ~«hiec.t propprt,y meets the~ u~ rposP and intent of the B-3 zone per Section
14.628~100 of thP 7onina Code. Adiacerl~t arooerties have received Zone upqrades.
WHAT MEASURES DO XOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACTON
SURROLTNDING LAND USE? Bufferi ng between thi s si te and the UR-3. 5 si te to the
to the north will be required as part of any 6-3 use of this property. The bufferii
will meet County Standards.
,
, . ~ , i •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATTON Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITT'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATI4N SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PRQPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTTON DISTRICT NO. /
) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
B. ADEQUATE A►RRANGEMENTS ICU
IN PROVIDING FOR .AN ADEQUA WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFiNITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
to FX--, 3- r8-4'b
' F1RE DISTRICT STGNATURE/TITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (09=) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
-~'7
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
1
A. COMIVIENTS :
SIGNATUF~E/TITLE 4D COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS-T-AIfENgLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE (HAVE NOT) BEEN S TISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITEIS- L~`•~~ ~(20WL-` '
A. COMMENTS: CJ17Lr W1 Li.. %JC- CbUPLL 0VT t"~G~2 C'0XAUZ-6Vn1 Zta .
f qWf&: j0V)*5i.tc. 5 -~Jt;.2 • ~
3,16' "i(Q .
SIGNATUREITITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
~
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACEAND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) ef-IAVE NOT)"N BEEN SATISFIED.
` -
A. COMMENTS: ~ 5~~ S`~•-~.~ r'1 u.~, c ut ~ L~.
SIGNA'IrUREITITLE DATE
:
1~ ~fiETER PUKVEYOR -
rr~l S -I"lti~~ ~ f`~~ -C,~ . ~
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL UIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: x
1~g
SIGNATURF.tTITLE DATE -
_
~
. , . , ?
, - .
, r . I
u •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION, Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
~ ,..r~..~►~~~ Q ~~~~Q'7~0
SIGNED: DATE: S 94
. ,
oFwASy, U ADDRESS. 707 West 7th, Suite 200 PHONE: 458-6840
H
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99204
It ~ r'
~ 16091 ~~C PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
PIRES 12 08
ERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERTURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFiED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTTONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
c.~,~.
_
NAME: Ro~e,,,rL~ Ile-IT'01A,-.4 DATE:
ADDRESS: N. 8205 Di vi si on Street pHpNE: 467-2123
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99208
~
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
,
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED ANU SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
.
1996, BY va
NOTARY SEAL Q✓~ O f/ ~t
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
sr,,rFoOFFICIAL SEAL ~ Residing at: S~O o/~ ~-•Ka.
PATRICK J MOORE
Notary Public - Washin9ton My appointment expires:
•~y, p,U.~ M, Ccmmission Expires D
144$ >
_ ' ~'VYVV"vvv vvi
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY TI-E DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTEll: FILE
DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
- - -
n ,
. . ~ . •
ERMIT CENTtR. PASSPORT
. „
~ o
Datc ~ n Number.
Name I , ' PhoneI~L,..
Address `
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING
Drvision of 8uilding & Plannmg Division of Building 8t Planning /
} titi . r , , . rN i,
~
] Addressing ~ Admm Exception ~ Approach Permit
s Building Permit ] Artcrial Rd Plan Info ~ Flood Plain Permit
: Code [nformation ~ Binding Site Plan Info ~ PubliclPrivate Roads
~ Commercial Review E]Cert of Exemption ~ Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
~ Cnnference ~ Comprehensive 1'lan ~ Site Drainage Info
~ Energy Codc Info ~ Cond. Use Permit Subdivision Review
] Firc Safety Review FINonconforming Use ~ Utility Pertnit
FlManufactured Home ~ Peimit Review Zone Change Review
~ Mechenical Permits ~ Shorclines Info ~
i ptiier permits ~ Short Plat Info ~ NO FEEREQUIRED
7-9eview Time out
! Plumbing Permits i Subdrvision lnfo
r ~~ir r r r r ~ Private Road lnfo ~ Temp Use Permit ~`'T.~W8 ~Yis#tyx!
~ Residential Review FIVariance Appl. FIAPA Payment
F]Sewcr Permits F]Zone Check ~ Cert. of Exemption
~ Information ~ Zone Info ~ Subdivision Review
ULID/Sawer Info
Z,one Change Review
.ri
NO FEE REQUIRED NO FEE REpUIRED
Reviewer Tune out Reviewcx Time out ReviewEx Time out
MA57MPASSPORI CiR ?116146
6hh,
RECE~ Y
+ ~ t
TRANSACTION NUNIBER: T9600999 DATE: 03/18/96
APPLICANT: SHELLEY LAECE DEVELOP PHONE=
ADDRESS: 8205 N DIVISION ST
, SPOI{ANE WA 99208
CONTACT NAME: SHELLEY LAKE DEVELOP PHONE=
TRANSACTION: REZONE APPLICATION SIGN-OFFS (ENGRS & UTIL)
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMl1RY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAI, DUE = 220.00
TOTAI, PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
03/18/96 00001894 1005/7 220.00
PROCESSED BY: KATHY CUNIMINGS
PRINTED BY: KATHY CUMMINGS
THANK YOU
>
1 50% pass-by and linked trips appears a little high Using studies of similar size (50-150 ft2
GLA), from Table VII-1 of ITE's Trip Generation Manual the average pass-by and linked trip rate
is 44%. The difference in pass-by rates is shown below.
105 KSF 1 40% 1 45% 150%
New Trips ~ 409 ~ 375 ~ 341
Pass-by Trips ~ 273 ~ 307 ~ 341
?~2 According to the Shelley Lake DEIS, the Shelley Lake PUD is expected to be completed in
the year 2000 The analyses for 2001 and 2006 of the Heitman Carnine Commercial Site use
phase 1 background traffic from the Shelley Lake PUD rather than the buildout traffic form
Shelley Lake. At a minimum, buildout traffic from Shelley Lake should be used in the 2006
analyses
3 Figure 5 accounts for all of the site generated traffic, in and out, for the AM peak, however, it
appears as if 1 trip in is lost and 1 trip out is gained between Sullivan and Conklin
44. Based on the number of movements at the intersection of Sullivan Rd and Sprague Ave from
Figure 6, it appears that only half of the trips were assigned to the network Figure 6 shows 86
trips each in and out of the study area when 170 ins and 171 outs are required.
5. Site generated traffic volumes shown in Figures 5& 6 do not show any trips from the East.
~6. To make the report complete and easier to follow, figures depicting background traffic
movements from the Shelley Lake PUD should be included
7 In Figure 8, the background WBL traffic of phase 1 from Shelley Lake PUD for the
intersection of Sullivan and Sprague was mistakenly added to the WBR.
8 Figure 14 should be labeled, PM Peak Hour 1997 w/ Project. In addition to the listed in
Figure 8, the NBT traffic should total 389 rather than the 398 shown.
9 Existing traffic counts taken by the County are generally higher as shown below.
~ EBL ~ EBT ~ EBR ~ WBL ~ WBT ~ WBR ~ NBL ~ NBT ~ NBR ~ SBL 1iVT I SBR I Total 3$y3
I PEC ~ 336 ~ 568 ~ 204 ~ 250 ~ 471 ~ 164 ~ 149 ~ 380 ~ 147 ~ 163 ~.W 1 340 1,?t7&3",
County ~ 405 ~ 620 ~ 218 ~ 276 ~ 469 ~ 123 ~ 145 ~ 358 ~ 154 ~ 207 ~ 696 1 341 14012
~d
~
,
( r Vb ~ `
• d' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ `
-
i
- _r ~_r~-- - ~ -
,
~ _ p -
~~4
_
~
~ , - ,
_
~ ~ -
~
_ ~
~
~-r-`~"
_ - -
2 1~0
~
. N ,
~ o-(22)13 29(4)-~ .c~°
`~~7 (1)e C:k7 ~
~ a4~ a4~
G,j N
C^
U ~
~
SPRAGUE AVE SPRAGUE AVE
~ . ~
0
cr z
J
^ Q Z
v ~ O
D U
" N
~ ~2 ~
a4~
~
~ FOU RTH
. ~
~
-0 o-
`z
0
~
~
16TH ~
~
Z
Z •
~
PM PEAK ~
~ (AM PEAK) NOT TO SCALE
i
~
INLFIGURE .AND 7 ELI.EY LAKE `
PACIFIC
~ ALT No. 1- PHASE 1 sPOwvvE GTON
ENGINEERING ~ of p~~s
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
South 25 Altomont SaokaneWo3hington
(509) 535-1410 99202 AND ASSIGNMENT TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
~
+ n oCD+
o to
rt(5 )s1 ~ o-
~ ~8~y10 ~ a ~
4~
~ U ao
v N v v v
O ~
v
SPRAGUE AVE SPRAGUE AVE
0
z
ZQ .
a+ ao ~
N r„ Y
z
J 0
~
(10)9 J U
~
c:~7 if
m
~
v
n
.
~
' FOURTH
~
co
N
v
~ CZP
. a- (21)18
0
~ o
16TH ~
~ -
~
0
d
Z
•
~ J
~
PM PEAK
(AM PEAK) ~J~Gk ~✓~'~C T~i~ NOT TO SCALE
INLAND PACIFIC*` FIGURE 8 ~ ELLEY lAK
~ ALT No. 1-- PHASE 2 sPO~v ~ TON
ENGINEERING
- o~ D~ ~S
South 25 Attcmont Spokane,Wc3hin9ton TRIP DISTRIBUTION ,~P~
~ (509) 53s-1410 99202 AND ASSIGNMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
~
~
- s
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGiNEERING, iNC.
'
April 25, 1996
W.O. No. 96048
Pat Harper
Spokane County Engineering Department
~ W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Re: Threshold Traffic Study for Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
Dear Pat:
Based upon our project understanding through conversations with you and the sponsor, we have
, prepared a brief traffic threshold determination for this project. This threshold study has been
requested as a part of a rezone application of the property. The parcel is presently zoned B-2,
Community Business and the rezone request is for B-3, Regional Business.
~
THRESHOLD DETERMINA TION
,
I INTR OD UCT1ON
This site is located on the north side of Sprague Avenue between Conklin Road and Steen Road.
~
Directly to the west of this site is Carnine Road, an urumproved county right of way. The
surrounding area along Sprague Avenue currently enjoys B-3 zoning classification. Property north
of Sprague, which does not front on Sprague is zoned UR-3.5. The zone reclassification for this
property will enable a slightly different mix of retail, business or office uses on this site than the
existing B-2 zone does. The existing zorung is shown on Figure 1 which is attached.
~
At the present time, the site is a vacant field, and is not in use for any purpose No specific use has
been identified for this site, therefore no site plan has been prepared to accompany this rezone
application. It is also not known when this site will be built out. Therefore, this aslalysis will look
at the one year, five year and ten year build out scenarios. This site is the nght size and location for
a usage such as a Shopko/KMartlFred Meyer or other major retailer This proposed highest and best
' use is what the traffic studY will assume for the site. Other usages are possible but do not represent
higher traffic generators A general vicinity map, Figure 2, is attached.
At this time no site plan for this zone reclassification has been prepared, therefore, actual site access
locations from Sprague are not known. Howevcr, access to this site will be by driveway directly to
Sprague and may also include a driveway to Carnine as a secondary access point, and wlll be
analyzed as such.
707 West 7th • Swte 200 2020 Lakewoocf Dnve • Surte 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814
509-458-6840 • FAX 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX 208-769-7277
'
Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 2
'
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS '
Sprague Avenue is the only street which was scoped to be analyzed for this project. Impacts from
the Heitman Carnine commercial site, if any, will be analyzed at the following intersections:
• Sprague & Sullivan
• Sprague & Conklin
Sprague Avenue, a four-lane, two-way, east-west principal arterial through the Spokane Valley with
a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Land uses throughout it's length are primarily commercial in nature
~ In the vicinity of the site, Sprague has two lanes in each direction with a non-standard (4-6 foot)
center median stnp and is bordered with both large and small businesses.
III EXISTING CONDITION - Levels of Service (per HCM
Traffic counts had been taken at Sprague & Sullivan during April 1996. Traffic counts at Sprague
& Conklin were taken in 1994 and updated to match the counts at Sprague and Sullivan taken in
April 1996. The existing levels of service at the subject intersections were calculated using the
Synchro Signal Coordination Computer Program which is based on the 1994 Highway Capacity
Manual. A summary of the existing levels of service at the subject intersections are shown in the
following table. The traffic volumes used for this report are shown on Figures 3& 4, Existing AM
(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes which are attached.
'
Table 1- Existing Level of Service
IINTERSECTIaN AM pM
(S)ignalized
' (U)nsigna[ized DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
~ 6,a
Sprague & Sullivan S 18.5 sec '1~` C 22.5 sec C
Sprague & Conklin U 10.2 sec C 48.1 sec F
' Both intersections are presently functioning at LOS C during the AM Peak hour. SPrague &
Sullivan is also working at LOS C during the PM peak hour. Sprague & Conklin is presently
working at LOS F in the PM peak hour. Due to this fact, a warrant analysis was conducted, and it
was discovered that this intersection meets warrants for a traffic signal. It does not, however, meet
either Warrant 1 or 2.
' Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
Apri125, 1996
Page 3
'
A condition on the nearby Shelley Lake residential development plat states that at the completion
of 101 homes in this development, that a signal would be required at this intersection. Spokane
County also has a TIB project scheduled to install a traffic signal at this location. Since the Shelley
Lake development is moving forward, and the intersection is now functioning at LOS F and meets
signal warrants, this intersection was assumed to be signalized before the completion of the Heitman
Carnine commercial site.
' IV BACKGROUND PROJ,ECTS
The Shelley Lake residential projects was identified for inclusion in this traffic study as contributing
~ to the transportation system Therefore, trafFic volumes as shown for phase 1 in the DEIS prepared
for Shelley Lake were added to the existing traffic volumes. Also a non site specific traffic growth
factor of 2.5% per year compounded for the one, five and 10-years that this project may take to
complete was added to the existing volumes to predict the future traffic volumes.
V TRIP GENER.ATION
The B-3 - Regional Business zone has many land uses permitted under it which will generate traffic
at different rates. However, since ultimate plans for this site are not defined at this time, this site was
examined at it highest and best use and therefore, the "Shopping Center (820)" category from the
Trrp Generation Manual, Sth Edition was used as the trip generator for this site. Many other land
' uses are possible for this site, however, none will generate traffic to and from the site to the extent
that land uses which fall under the Shopping Center category will.
Table 2 shows new trips to the site and trips which are "pass-by" or linked tnps. New trips are trips
which would not otherwise be on the transportation system except for the potential uses at this site
when it is in operation. Based upon information in Table VII-lA of the Trip Generation Manual,
sound engineering judgement and consistent with the existing nearby land uses, it was determined
that 50% of the driveway trips to and from this site would be new trips, and 50% would be "pass-
by" or linked trips. This "pass-by" rate applies only to the PM peak hour since the AM peak hour
~ traffic is assumed to be employee traffic (new trips) and not present until after the AM commute
Based upon requirements in Spokane County, approximately 25% of raw land available within an
industrial or commercial development will be converted into square footage for the building on the
site. Therefore, the 9.69 acres which comprise this proposal can support 105,000 square feet of
building area. B o S, 1'15Z10,
'
~ Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
Apri125, 1996
Page 4
'
Table 2- Trip Generation - Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
A►M Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
~ KSk`
Vol. @ Directional Vol. @ Directional
1.60 tirips Distribution 6.49 trips Distribution
per KSF 63% In 37% OUt Per KSF 50% In 50% Out
' 105 168 106 62 682 341 341
New Trips 84 53 31 340 170 170
Pass-by 84 <'J ~ 53 31^ 342 171 171
- -
. ,
Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT)
KSF 12ate Total ADT
' ,A lyl
105 7,335
New Trips 69.86 3,667
Pass-by 3,668
KSF - Thousand Square Feet
VI TRIP DISTRIBU7'ION (simplified gravity model)
~ For this analysis, it was assumed that the traffic generated by the Heitman Carnine commercial site
would ingress and egress from the site approxunately 50% to/from the east and 50% to/from the west
during the peak hours. In part this distribution is based upon the directional distribution at Sprague
1 & Conklin, but also it is based upon the area from which this store will draw. Residential
development is primarily located east and south (west) of this site. Traffic volumes, based on this
distribution, for the peak hours are shown on Figures 5& 6.
This land use will carry items which may compete with items at any of the following stores in the
surrounding area• Fred Meyer, Ziegler's Building Center, K Mart, Best, Green Thumb Nursery,
, Sho Ko and Tar et or other nearb stores and is e
P g y xpected to draw from basically the same
population of valley residents. These residents live south of Mission Avenue, west of Henry Road
and east of Evergreen. Motorists who access this site from other parts of the valley, or other parts
of Spokane or Spokane County, would not be new trips, but rather should be considered "pass-by"
or linked trips and are already on the transportation system. Some of the residents within the
primary service area may also be linked trips.
~ Heitman Camine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 5
'
VII FUTURE COIVDITION with/without PROJECT - Level of Service
The Heitman Carnine commercial site may be completed within one, five or ten years. Therefore,
the background traffic was compounded at the 2.5% rate as explained previously in this report for
the year, five year or ten year condition during which this project may be completed and the traffic
from Phase I of Shelley Lake was also added. The levels of service expected for these intersections
with the increases expected over the next year, in five years and in ten years without the additional
traffic from the Heitman Carnine commercial site are shown on the following table. The traffic
volumes which the levels of service in the table are based on, are shown in Figures 7- 12.
, Table 3- Levels of Service Without the Heitman Carnine commercial site
BUILD OUT YEAR BACKGRO C11~1) ~'~FIC
INTERSEC''ION
(S)ignafized AM PM
(L)nsignalized DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
Sprague & Sullivan S 21.1 sec C 25.9 sec D
~ 1997
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.1 sec A
'
2001 Sprague & Sullivan S 22.2 sec C 28.4 sec D
Sprague & Conklin S 3 1 sec A 4.7 sec A
,
Sprague & Sullivan S 24.5 sec C 35 5 sec D
2006
, Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 6 0 sec B
Table 3 shows the changes in level of service to be expected at these two intersections in the future
~ without the additional traffic from the Heitman - Carnine commercial site in operation. Note that
the intersection of Sprague & Conklin is operating at high levels of service as a signalized
intersection. Note also that the intersection of Sprague & Sullivan will be working at LOS D, and
that the amount of delay at this intersection will slowly increase as time goes on.
Adding the traffic anticipated to be generated by this proposal to the traffic anticipated in 1997, 2001
and 2006 indicates that the levels of service will be as shown on Table 4. The traffic volumes which
are expected under these conditions are shown on Figures 13-18.
~
~ Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 6
~
Table 4- Levels of Secvice with the Heitman Caraine Commercial Site
1 ,
$TJILD OUT YEAR ]BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
INTCRSECTZON
(S)igna lized AM pM
(L)nsignalized DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
Sprague & Sullivan S 21.6 sec C 27.2 sec D
1997
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.2 sec A
~
Sprague & Sullivan S 22.8 sec C 30.4 sec D
2001
~ Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 5.0 sec A
2006 Sprague & Sullivan S 25.5 sec D 40.4 sec )</E
~
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 6.6 sec B
~
With the additional traffic from the project, the level of service at Sprague & Sullivan will change
from LOS C to LOS D during the AM peak hour if this project is completed 10 years from now. At
~ S ra ue &
p g Conklin, the levels of service in the AM and PM peak hour will remain the same.
~ VIII. CONCL USIONS
From the data collected for this threshold determination, we conclude that the development of the
~ Heitman Camine commercial site will not impact either the intersections of Sprague & Sullivan or
Sprague & Conklin and that both of these intersections will be functioning at acceptable levels of
service. If the intersection of Sprague & Conklin is not signalized before the completion of this site,
~ this intersection will continue to function at LOS F, and as traffic increases delay will also increase
1
~ Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 7
~
IX. I'R0POSED MITIGA770N
The addition of the Heitman Carnine commercial site project is not anticipated to have any impacts
to the lntersections of Sprague & Sullivan or Sprague & Conklin. Therefore, no mitigation is
needed or recommended specifically relating to fihis project However, since the intersection of
Sprague & Conklin is presently functioning at LOS F, and meets signal warrants, it may be time to
exercise the RID option to signalized this intersection.
'
After review of this threshold determination please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering Co
G~v .
1
;
Ann L Winkler, P.E
ALW/alw
~
encl
cc 13uster Heitman, Landmark Bwlders
~
John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
Bob Brueggeman, Spokane County Engineers
file
~
~
~
~
oK i u~ t - --r ~
~ - "*4506
. • Bm3
• Q
~
R-22 ~ RO^ D ^ti' Hv E. ~
- ~
~.1 Firc ' ~ .
K. ~ [SP21 tation
I• ~ .
lc t J r- .
. URmI5
1 UZ3.5 C o
~
~ 8- ~ <
PROJECT
f - ~ -[a_-_x:sc,~ LOCATION
_2 ,
, URm.3*5
~ ~h• w ~ . M ~ A~.
~ UR•22 8_2
B2
3 -2' g _ B-3 < .
'PRAGl1E ~ 8- UR-
r
. B3 ~
~ A~ Z ~ ~ . N N N 1i ( _2 •I "'~3
~r
B
r m- R_3 ' - m c
I
~ - - ~ . . - _ - - .('-0 2 u R - 2 2 _
UR-
URe-2 2 ~ c URUR•
3•5 4' . . u~
r--
~ 8 R' p ~ E .if)
iE 2 ~ ~7
6 EL LEY 09
T,tro . `ol i ex . ~ ; 'JLAKE
~ • ~ I ~
~ ~ } . . . . .
- ~ -K. fiea~ URm395
, H AvE
C . V.
9 T N H: l G' N~
Ulm33
~ Cl-~ o ot ,
~ I NLAND FiGURE 1
~ CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPER'TY
PACIFIC
ENGINEERING EXISTING ZONING MAP
7 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT /1W>LY$IS
S ane, WA 99204 FN( (509) 458-6 84-4,r\ F'ROJECT N0. 96048 ~
\
►~"~e ~ _ { 1'~ V_ _ ~ _ ~ { ~
F(pq,~ 1tISS14N
PI f Rp ~ c.
O
~ ~ - . ~ ~ IXA
r ~ ~
~ r r r ~ r ' 800NE
MISSION
d ~ 4L
k ,
~ $tNTO 1~ vE c.
Z dO a
Al
x `t
o
<
OoOFIE 4~ d 5: a M 2
°G
oc C~ 41,4t`pg1
< <
OESµE1 .
v - "
a gRoo'DWAY
A
Loo _ Z N ~
> C,~r &
Q tr Av E Ts
0 o Y A
~~Q ` j II O K } GF
I~.~c; W K` x`
~ ~ , - Pfoqress i_-- Q
~V E ~
~ cT Ete^' d . 0
~ p ~
Z qva►NGF►Eto &vE ALK~ ~V ~r--- Q u V~IIEY WAY
~ LLK~ OLivf Q ~ CL , ~ ~,dq1N
V
~ ` ~ ~ o _ ,
~ ` ~ ~ rAI.IEY 4 ' W ~
AX Q
z Ln Z ' Z Q C,reenec
uaIN
~ ttcoK W - ~►co" m w ~ a~kEaS~oE ~ W ~r ~
a ~
Z
o < y aO ; c. Y AIN SIOE ~ r
kA1VE 11LIN m m I R ~,G
4 LO
I ~ d d ~
¢
ivEaSlOE p„ AV E ~ uE►~00`K ~
i S~~E a y ra ~ eao4~~. n 31
o SPRAGUE tisT ~ ~ = d W ~
~ cc ~ w~ ° t T N~
.
CA ZNQ z' ~ r W a
<
m = 2Np ZKO .~tHO STri
m~rH „
ccl:
~0 lR0 AVE N ~ ~ ?
~
W C I
~ao ~ st" • ,
m ,
N
~ d ~ d 6iN
C! , .
5TH . O ~ 6YN ~
m z Adams ~
O~ Elem 1 st.-, JE
~ Q u+ o a ~ p~
o ~ ~ R , ol w'w , 10N
~ p
g~~T
} ~ m tiotK
< ~
Ali ~
<T~~ AY E a 9'fH z a' a ; ~ t~tH s , " tititH v, ol P.
N ti2
tOTN 9TH Ct a~ 1OTM~ u=_ d ;i °C ` Q o 4/ 4k1` pR ~ .
y cc Y .
~,4 Z~ ft a ~-Y C!
t
v l._ ~ v CC
AVE C)
N If
w _ 11(N ~AVE C~ q
aC~Z + 71t µ
W y J i ti~i 131K o14<n %cr
p -~1
W J AY E'
z
t? °°'~.Ji ~a~ ybtH {r jEver9(ecA 4 Q = ; ~ 1 J 1 N l
tt S °D c1
7 a m ~ CC Q f w
p ~w
LU Q 171k1 AYE ItTM _ 1TT14 A~E ~ '
q 4 t ~ 4 ~ w
T T H
ac i{iN AYEk" 6 O , a a
~ ~ ~ c, _
a o `c m 0
aC t i n z Q 4 ~ 9
m
N W nvE 4 a ~~:cr►+ ~ci ~ ~ ¢ toTtA , ^,z 2 /
,
t ~ W, i y (1 z,si s f~
~2or►+ ° , t 2tiST AVE
m iUNNYSI ~
~c 1(` t
~ ° o ~ _A
~y E ..~.4 -r' pROREF~'~
i~sr ~vE R 21"0 Fl ~~tNINE COMMER~~-
r~~kn E1em ~ / ~IJRE 2 ~
d
N i ~13R~
~ ~ 1 !
I J
IIAPJvCT a'~'~s
v~ . 96048
* Nl- AND N~ MAP ~ftOJECT N4
PA~~F ~c CI '
'
ENGINEERING 458-6840
Irv;;
. Su ite 200 (509) 50 ~ 6a~ j
~
w~t wA, 99204 _ FAX.
~
~
~
~
Z Z W
j J Z
,
J Y Z
~ p Q SITE
U) SPRAGUE U U
N T
183~ Q 87 4~' ~ 13
233 G.- 293 493 °.J Q- 532
Sg160 3Ir 11
m o ao c°i`+
n ~
~
J
+I NLAND / ~RE 3 ~NINE COM~iERCU1L PROPER'TY `
PACIFIC . acls~nNG
E NGINEERING AM PEAK HOUR TRAMC IMPA+CT ANALYSIS
07 west 7tn • sUfts 200 (509) 458-6840 ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECT N0. 96oa8
pokcne. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844J ~
\
ti
Z Z W
Z
,
Y
J z Otf
0 Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
os~pp~ <12
N p 336 ~ i 64 22 % 568 --C> 471 1122 -0 a-- 890
204 cz~N~ ~ 250 12 36
la~ 1 ~ ~ 1 U
4m 0 a
~
~
RtEENGINEERING i NLAND / FlGURE 4 ~NINE CO~IMERCtAI. PROPER'TY ~
PACIFIC oclstiNG
PM PEAK HOUR
1'RAFf1C IMPACT ANAL.YSIS
kw~~t 7m • surte 200 (509) 458-6e40 TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECT N0. 9go~
WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
~ ~ \ / \
~
.
. `
~
J
~
~
e ,
r,
Al
h
yU ~
LLJ
"
Z • G _ Z CY-'
.,c~C ~y C~ - ~ ' ►
~
~ SpRAGI~E
,ci,,. 3, .
c'
i~`'i ~ r
U
N 6' `
P,, r
G✓v~
~ .
.
. .
no
' PRpQERm
Cj,~gN►NE
/00
. ~
FlGURE 5
. +
" NOUR ~ TWM IMP No 9g0'48
Np p~M P~ ~~p pRaE~ .
~NLA S~E GEN
~ • A~j'~'c 'N~ woLUM~ ,
~
ENcj%EER .
(50g~ 458" 6840 684.4
{~g09~
- - . Suitle 200 IFW
1
~
. ~
1
~
r
~ .
s
;
,
~ v ^o
e, • '
~
C✓ ~ ~ ~ . i ■ '~.a ~ ~ •
~
,c~ ~ v
~
~ - -
~ 30
30 43
~
t <<>
~
. e
~
, r
~
~ NINE coMMeRctAL pRopCRV
FIGURE $
P~ HovR ~c E~ 9~
INLAND SPMITE GENERA'T-'D P~ 0000
C V4LUME'
NGIN~ER1N'G .
E
~ ~ -7 tt► • Sutte 200 F~' -(g~ )
\
~
~
~
Z Z Z LLJ
~ --J ~
Ne
J Z cy-
~ O Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
~co o m
n N n
188 .p 89 a j~ 13
239 --C> Q- 322 509 a.(> 546
59 165 3 11
wN ao ^n
n
a
~0
,
,
~
I NLAND FlGURE 7 CARNINE COMMERCUIL PROPERTY `
PACIFIC AM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFRC IMPaCT ANALY'S1S
I F west nn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 WITNOUT PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
~ J
kane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ~ o/
\
i
~
W ~
W
~ ° ~`y~ J Z J Z ~
:D Q Q SITE
U) SPRAGUE U U
, co g° No=
19~~~b'j~56 ,~~,2
582 ~ 9s rA > »e s13
2pg 6• 12 37
I~AtD~ N ~d
~n-
4
ev f,\ y~ ,~4
r ✓
J
NLAND ~ FlGURE 8 CARNINE C01riMERCUL PROPERTY
' I `
PACiFIC PM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING 1997 T'RAFF'IC VOLUMES TPAMC IMPACT ANAL1r51S
~ west 7m • s+,tte 200 (gas) 458-6840 WITHOUT PROJECT PROJEC'T N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~
~ J~ ~
~
ly ~ .
t~
•
r ~lr 1
„
^ (D c0 ~ N :2
N M
C) k~
~g 0
~ 207 ~ ~ 98 % k 5~ ~ 14 Q Q
~ 264 C- 354 ~ ~ •562 ~J G~ 602 0 ol
66~ /r1821~~ 3 czz~r ~13
z z LLJ
~ 03
J O O N tn~ M Z ~
n 'L
0 U PROJECT S(TE
:D 0
SPRAGUE - AVENUE
~
A
~
~
NOT TO SCALE
J
INLAND FiGURE #9
~
PACtFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALY5IS
t 7 west 7tn • suite 200 (509)4s8-684.0 ~ W/0 PROJECT ` \ PROJECT N0. 96048 `
kone, WA 99204 FAX (509 458-6844of "0 ,0
d
J u ° u ^l
~
~y U
~
00 n O r r
M n N
Q 380 194e
~
~ 24 }
643 546- 1299-=> G- 1007 0 0
231cz~N 283I ~ 14~ /~41 ~ LY_
a4~c~ Z Z .
J "'o~ N~oN Y -
ZI Z
0 Q
U o PROJECT S(TE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
~
Pr F;
f
r
NOT TO SCALE
~
J t
:
40 ~
INLAND FIGURE #10 PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPER'TY ;
~ ENGINEERINQ 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES E
west 7tr, • suite 200 (509) ase-ssao TRAF~1C IMPACT ANALYSIS ~
~ kane, wA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844/ ~ WIO PROJECT / ` PROJECT N0. 96048 0/
~
E
\
' o
r J n
~J V~ `n @
r 7 ~
7tn ~ NN ~
N
0 Cp 4~ ~ 0
~ 234~ ~111 O,, 5~ ~,16 O OQ_
298 ~ C= 397- -635 681
74 Q gP 206, 1~/4 4~ ~ 14
Z
Z W
r J z
J ~o 04 'n M
a Y Z
Z
c~l) U0 U PROJECT S(TE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
r
n7 ~
~ j~ x ✓ .
~
~i
'
a
NOT TO SCALE
o/
I NLAND FIGURE #11
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENQINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALY5IS
707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 NI/(~ P R OJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
r ne. WA 99204 FAX t509 458-6844~ oo/
~ ~
1
~ m N
Q ~,ubt 4C 0
0 430P ~218 ~vq' 28J' ~16~ xraa Q
~ 727 ~ G= 616`,f~ ,1466=J C. 1 140
~ ~ ~ ~
261 320'~~ - 16 47 !tU ~ cr-
Z ' Z ~
Qo M° ~ Y Z
cr-
~ 0 U PROJECT SITE
~
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
~
.
~
'
~ •
i
f
E
1 i
~
t
NOT TO SCALE ~
~
i
I NLAND FiGURE # 12 ~ r ~ j
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
ENGINEERINCi 2006 TRAFFIC VOLU M ES TRAFFIC iMPACT ANALYSIS ,
7r west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840
~ one, wA 99204 FAX- (509) 45$-684400 ~ W/0 PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
~
~
~
~
rnao
~ N
C)
a 188 ~ ~ 94 4~ ~ 13 Q O
258 4= 333 562 ~ 577
59~ ~181 3 ~ /~11 ~ w
Z W
> J Z ■
r
J ON
~ n z Qf
0 C~j PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
1
1
NOT TO SCALE
/
I NLAND i~ FIGURE #13
PACIFIC CARNINE C4MMERCtAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERINCi A.M. PEAK HOUR
1997 TRAFFI C VO LU M ES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
4 west 7tn • suite 200 (sos) ass-ssao T PROJECT N0. 96048
kone, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844J ` WI I H PROJECT o/ \ ,
~
~
,
o o ~
M 0 N
Q
0 344 cP z- 189 l 22 c~P 12 O ~
612 526 1264~ ~ 998
209 fi 299' i"' 12 ~ 37 ~ ~
Q v z W
J Z '
~ ~ rn ~ ~a0 ~ Y Z
J " r Z l.L
0 U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE . AVENUE
~
'
' .
NOT TO SCALE
b~
~ J
NLAND \ f -VFIGURE # 14,,,`-- 1 l 1
PACIFIC P.M. PEAxl*~ HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENQINEERINti 2001 T A IC VOLUMES TRqFFiC IMPACT ANALYSiS
7 west 7th • Swte 200 (509) 458-6840 /Q P J ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kune, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844/ J
/
~
~ ~ ~r
N ^ N ~
1-t~ ~ ~ Q ~
Q Q
20~ ~ 03 s~ 14
0 283 ~ Q--- 365` ;O~' 615 -633 0 0
66 198, 3 13
Z Z W
z
> og N 'n~ ~ Y Z
J 7°0 ~ 4 o Z of
n" O Q
(n PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE ~
'
~
,
'
rvor To seALE
~
INLAND 1 ~ FIGURE #15
PACIFIC A. M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
row.= ENGINEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
west 7tn • suite 200 (509) a5s-c~ao PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6644 W
J \ /
~ / /
\
~
. r
~ ~ ~
~ ^ N
0
a 380 J, ~ 207' pJ ~ ~ 24 14 Q Q■
~ 673 ~J 4 576` 1384~j G~ 1092 0 0
231 326" 14 41
Z
z w
~ J Z
J N ~
N ~ Z
Z '
I. y Olf
00 (<j PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE . ,
' ~ -
x ~
~
,
a
NOT TO SCALE
~
I NLAND ~ r FIGURE #16
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPER'T1(
ENQ{NEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
~ west 7tr, • suite 200 (509)4s8-6840
\ W j PROJECT J ` PROJECT N0. 96048 ~
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844~
~
~
~
Vtn CY) ~ N N ~
N
Q ~ V 1-tl ,0 ~ ,~i 0
o
0 234 116 . ~p 5~ ~ 16 Q Q
~ 317 408--~ r688 ~ C- 712 0 O
Z 74 222• 4 14
LLJ
j ~Qp J Z
o ,n `n N'~ Y Z
J Z ~
~ X`~~' 0 U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
I I
'
~
~
a
NOT TO SCALE
~
INLAND 1 ~ FIGURE #17
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC 1MPACT ANALY'SIS
4 wesc 7tn • suitc zoo (sos) asa-ssao PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kone, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844 W
J ~ / J \ J
\
\
~
~
~ d <p ~
n
d CO N ~
o ^~4 4~ t 'ge c~ o
a ~ ~ 11-1'
430 231, 28 1 g°
~ 757 ~ 646-~~~~ ~1551~ a 1225 ~ ~
~ 261 363- ~ii"ti16 47 -
z J Z ~
> ~~M e Y Z
J r~ N Z
6 0 U PROJECT SITE
~
SPRAGUE AVENUE
- ~ r
~
~
♦
NOT TO SCALE ~
FiGURE #18
I NLAND
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
;
ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC iMPACT ANALYSIS ;
7 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 ~A~ PROJECT NO 96048
kane, WA 99204 fAX (509) 458-6844/ ~ ~r/ PROJECT \ /
~ ~
TT~► .
~
_ -
'
'
EXISTIN G
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
1
'
~
'
1
'
1
'
~
'
~
'
' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary
' Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle- 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ 177~
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
' Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
' Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
' YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
2 L.,~q ,.b 13 '
I Lii
19 15 12 44
' 20 Il d 22 +34
5 1-6 E1 g L~j 7
'
Volume Worksheet
--1 :0 A !j- Lq 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Votume (vph. ) 183 233 58 160 293 87 89 707 180 99 279 192
' Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 093 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1.05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 197 251 62 172 315 94 96 760 194 106 300 206
Lane Group Flow 197 345 0 172 450 0 96 1001 0 106 315 206
1
'
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D 196048\AMEX SY4
r..t.,.,.a mrr+ n.,-., i
~
,
SPRAGUE AVE & ~ULLiVAN Aprti 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ ~ ~ ~
EBL EST EBR WBL WBT 1NBR NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 D 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Fiow (vphp! ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
5hared Lane'? No Yes Na Yes No Yes Ido No
Lane W3dth (ft } 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°l~ 0% 0°l0 0'0In
Area Type Dther- Other Other Other
H@81Jy V@hIcleS (p/a) 4% 4#fv 4°1f~ 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#!hr } 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protected 0973 0969 0971 0850
~ Flt Protected 0950 0.950 0950 0950
Satd Flow (pro# ~ 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0 969 0 971 0850
Fit Perm 0950 0950 D 950 0950
~ Satd_ Flovxr (perrn ) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
L!j ~d CH Lnd T. 4 A ~ ~ .
~
Lane Group EBL E6T UVBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot 7 Prot Prot Prot Prat Prot Prot Prat Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph,) 197 345 172 450 96 1001 106 315 206
Prot Satd Flaw 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perrn Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.18 012 019 013 021 046 09(] 0 34 052
Lane Grp Cap {vph ) 309 652 328 708 356 1616 1 74 1259 811
V!G Ratio 064 0 53 052 064 026 0.62 061 0.25 025
CritMcal LG'? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Unrform Delay, d 1 261 282 254 281 225 141 295 161 78
Prog Factar 1 00 100 102 094 1 00 1 00 1 00 100 100
Incr De9ay, d2 30 07 1 2 1 3 0_1 05 43 00 00
Delay 291 288 267 278 226 146 338 161 79
~ LOS D D a c B D C B
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 12
Sum of Crit€cal V#S Ratios 54°l0
InterseCkion 1f1C Ratio 52°Ia
~ tntersec#ROn Delay' 20 l
Infersec#ion LC}S C
Synchi-o 2 0 Report D 1960481AWX SY4
lr~and Pacrfic Er,gineenng, IPEC Page 2
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
File Name AMEX.HCO
~ Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
' Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound r
L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
,
-
No. Lanes ; 0> 2< 0; 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0; 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; ;
' Volumes ; 4 493 3; 11 532 13; 4 3 29; li 1 15
PHF ; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0
MC's ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's M; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 l.l; 1.1 1.1 1.1
'
Adjustment Factors
, Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
~ Right Turn Minor Road 5.50
2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
'
'
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
'
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 248 272
' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.96 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 496 545
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
' TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1054 1050
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 264 265
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.97
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 257 258
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 1.00
' Step 4 LT from Minor Street NB ' SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1042 1048
' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 228 226
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.97 0.96
, Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.97
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.93
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 218 211
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
Intersection Performance Summary
, F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS BY APp
NB L 6 218 > > >
NB T 4 257 > 597 > 6.5 > B 6.5
NB R 37 1037 > > >
SB L 14 211 > > >
SB T 1 258 > 389 > 10.2 > C 10.2
SB R 20 1008 > > >
EB L 6 874 4.1 A 0.0
WB L 14 929 3.9 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.5
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
' .
-IJ _ fl
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 29 26 24 21 15 24 16 25
Current Split (°/6) 32% 29% 27% 23% 17% 27% 18% 28%
Minimum Sptit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
~1 +_.12 I Ll d I~ ,J
~3 29 21 16 24
24 126 15 I 25
'
jJ 5 -A 6 IE18 jj 7
Volume Worksheet
2J' Fl !d 4-1 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SB-T SBR
Volume (vph ) 336 568 204 250 471 164 149 380 147 163 5811 340
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 40 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 361 611 219 269 506 176 160 409 158 175 625 366
Lane Group Flow 361 913 0 269 751 0 160 595 0 175 656 366
~gl
1
1
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481PMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC page I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN april zs, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Fiow (vphpi ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grede 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 964 0 965 0 960 0.850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 964 0 965 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm.) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
zz~ <1
Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 361 913 269 751 160 595 175 656 366
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 29 0 26 0 23 0 20 013 0 23 014 0 24 0 53
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 516 1390 417 1089 238 843 258 920 853
V/C Ratio 0 70 0 66 0 65 0 69 0 67 0 71 0 68 0 71 0 43
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 21 7 228 237 254 282 241 277 236 84
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 21 1.05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 29 08 24 1.3 49 19 4.7 1 8 02
Delay 246 236 31.1 280 33,1 26.0 325 255 86
LOS C C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 60%
Intersection V/C Ratio 70%
' Intersection Delay 25 0
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PMEX SY4
lnland Pacific Engineenng, TPEC Page 2
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
File Name PMEX.HCO
Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
, Length ofTimeAnalyzed::: 60 (min)
Analyst....... • ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No. Lanes ; 0> 2< 0; 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0; 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; ;
Volumes ; 22 1122 12; 36 890 12; 5 3 45; 11 0 12
PHF ; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0
MC'S M ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's M; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's M ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1
Adjustment Factors
'
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
'
Lef----t-Turn-----Ma---j-o-r-Ro----ad 5.50 2------
.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
,
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 567 451
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.92 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1134 902
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.90 0.95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.85 0.92
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2088 2088
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 65 65
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.78 0.78
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 51 51
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.94 1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2076 2078
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 50 50
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.78 0.74
' Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.83 0.80
Capacity Ad,7ustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.82 0.74
~ Movement Capacity: (pcph) 41 37
~
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
Intersection Performance Summary
FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App
NB L 6 41 > > >
NB T 3 51 > 224 > 22.3 > D 22.3
NB R 54 715 > > >
SB L 13 37 > > >
73 77.6 F 77.6
SB R 14 818 > > >
EB L 26 562 6.7 B 0.1
WB L 43 422 9.5 B 0.4
Intersection Delay = 1.6
'
, I
1997
, LEVELS OF SERVICE
'wVITHQUT PR4JECT
1
'
~
'
'
1
1
'
~
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' C cle Len th
y g 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ fj H ni T . L y ~
' EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Cur►'etlt Sp(it 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49°rb 13% 38%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s} 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
, SPlits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
't" 11 F-12 4 3
19 15 12 44
'
20 114 +22 134
8 ~7
Volume Worksheet
tJ nj U I&I Ll y. +j:.=
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Id6L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Volume (vph ) 188 239 59 165 322 89 91 725 184 105 286 197
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 257 63 177 346 96 98 780 198 113 308 212
Lane Group Flow 202 353 0 177 486 0 98 1027 0 113 323 212
'
,
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Aprti 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
, A !j- [ij EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°r6 0% 0% 0°r6
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 970 0 971 0850
~ Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd F,low (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0.973 0 970 0 971 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
*71 11
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBI. SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 353 177 486 98 1027 113 323 212
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 0.19 013 0 21 0 46 0 10 0 34 0 52
, Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 65 0 54 0 54 0.69 0 27 0 64 0 65 0 26 0 26
Cntical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 262 282 250 283 225 143 296 16.1 79
Prog Factor 1 00 1.00 1 01 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 34 07 1.4 1 9 01 06 57 00 00
Delay 29.6 289 268 286 226 149 353 161 79
' LOS D D D D C 6 D C B
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 12
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios 56%
intersection VIC Ratio 65%
, Intersection Delay 21 1
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
N KLI N Aon125, 1996
~ SPRAGUE AVE & CO
Timings Summary
' Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset 0(0°r6), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~
7.~ !7J .TI IJ
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84% 84% 16% 16%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
YellowTime{s) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splrts and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IT12 f~j- a
14 76
~
Volume Worksheet ,
11 ~ .
EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT W6R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 4 509 3 11 546 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
~ Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 105 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj. F1ow (vph ) 5 599 4 13 642 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
[ Lane Group Flow 0 638 0 0 704 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
~
,
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\ABO SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Aprii 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ . LIJ 30 . <-,-'I -.1 T 1 A . y. 1 tj
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0 1% 1°/6
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 823 0822
' Flt Protected 0 999 0 996 0.981
Satd. Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
Frt Perm 0 999 0.997 0 823 0 822
Flt Perm 0 935 0 914 0.992 0925
, Satd Flow (perm ) 3514 3428 1536
1430
~
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Group EBT WBT NBTT.; SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph ) 638 704 63 33
Prot. Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 3514 3428 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0.81 0 81 0 12 012
Lane Grp Cap (vph, ) 2850 2780 188 175
V/C Ratio 0 22 0 25 0 34 0.19
Critical LG? Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 1 5 275 270
Prog Factor 0 73 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 00 00 04 01
Delay 1.1 1 5 279 270
~ LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 25%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 26%
' Intersection Delay 3 1
Intersection LOS- A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
b
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
,
Timings Summary
' Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset 0(0%), Referencsd to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
''l -A Id i I~ y1 .y..
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
~ Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 28°fo 26% 22°!0 16% 27°!0 20% 31 %
Minimum Spfit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
, Spiits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
~2 t~ 4 T 3
28 p0 18 24
~ 23 M5 14 28
1-
,,G'j 5 17~ s
Volume Worksheet .
~ -S 3jo Ir . ~ .
~ ~ . ~ ~ .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 344 582 209 256 496 176 153 389 151 190 700 348
1 Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 OS 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 626 225 275 533 189 165 418 162 204 753 374
Lane Group Flow 370 935 0 275 795 0 165 609 0 204 790 374
~
~
S}mchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ .1 [3J LEJ E--: !J L*1 LIJ ~01 .L-4 41 ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT $BR
, Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
~ Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°!0 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
, Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 964 0 964 0960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 964 0.964 0 960 0850
' Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
1
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
l.ane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 935 275 795 165 609 204 790 374
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 019 012 0 23 017 0 28 0 56
t Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 75 0 70 0 69 0 77 0 76 0 72 0 68 0 76 0 42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 225 236 244 263 29.0 242 268 226 76
Prog. Factor 1.00 1 00 1 17 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00
Incr Delay,d2 42 12 35 26 94 21 44 2.2 02
Delay 267 24.8 322 302 384 263 312 248 78
LOS D C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 66%
Intersection V/C Ratio 76%
~ Intersection Delay 25 9
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBO SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, TPEC Page 2
~ prii 25, 1996
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN A
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
~
Natural Cycle, 80
Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~
H Tj y. _
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Sp1it (s } 77 77 13 13
Current Spiit (°lo) 86% 86°l0 14% 14%
~ Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 3 0 3 0 3 0
j SPlits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLiN
~T 2 t;14
13 77
,
Volume Worksheet .
r*
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 22 1179 12 37 913 12 29 8 48 11 0 12
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93
Lane Utii Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 24 1268 13 40 982 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
' Lane Group Flow 0 1370 0 0 1087 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1i A ~_.,L4 I..1 'ej..
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT N6R SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr.)
Frt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
Flt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 983 0.977
Satd. Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm. 0 999 0 998 0 824 0.830
Fit Perm 0 787 0 676 0 956 0910
, Satd Flow (perm ) 2958 2538 1482 1421
I
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~ H ! 9 A
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1370 1087 92 25
Prot. Satd Fiow
Perm. Satd Flow 2958 2538 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0.82 0 82 0 11 0 11
~ Lane Grp. Cap (vph. ) 2432 2087 165 158
V/C Ratio 0 56 0 52 0 56 0 16
CriUcal LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 2.0 1.9 288 275
Prog Factor 1 59 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 0.2 02 31 00
Delay 34 21 31 9 27.5
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length* 90
~ Lost Time. 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 53%
Intersection V/C Ratio 56%
Intersection Delay 4 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBO SY4
Inland Pacific Enguleering, IPEC Page 4
1997
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH PR4JECT
~
~
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
,
Timings Summary
, Cyc(e Length 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
Pt.
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16°l0 22°l0 17% 24°!0 49°!0 13% 38°l0
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s.) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
` Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
F-:2 t4 4 1 3
~
19 15 12 44
20 1 114 22 I 134
si 5 ~s -!2j $ 7 .
Volume Worksheet ,
~ ai ij rl . Ll 4.1 :
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 188 258 59 181 333 94 91 725 211 113 286 197
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 277 63 195 358 101 98 780 227 122 308 212
i Lane Group Flow 202 375 0 195 505 0 98 1057 0 122 323 212
~
~
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicies 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°r6
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protected 0 975 0 970 0 988 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0.950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 975 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0950
' Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~ ~
~ i..~
Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SgT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 375 195 505 98 1057 122 323 212
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 019 013 0.21 0 46 010 0 34 0 52
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 653 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 65 0 57 0 59 071 0 27 0 66 0.70 0 26 0 26
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 262 283 253 284 225 14.4 29.8 161 79
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 02 0.94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 34 09 2.1 23 01 07 8.0 0.0 00
Delay 296 292 278 291 22,6 15.1 378 161 79
' LOS D D D D C B D C B
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios 58%
Intersection VIC Ratio 67%
' Intersection Delay 21 6
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9604MABW SY4
tnland Pacific Engineering, [PEC Page 2
a
Apn125, 1996
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
Timings Summary .
, CYcle Length 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~ . .
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split (°Io) 84% 84% 16% 16°l0
MFnimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s. ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLtN
~►T 2 4
1476
Votume Worksheet .
:!j I J `i .1~ . ~
,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 4 562 3 11 577 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 105 1 05 1 OS 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 5 661 4 13 679 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
Lane Group Fiow 0 703 0 0 743 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Aprii 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ,
.
j EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°10 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/tir ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkirtg (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Flt Protected 0999 0996 0981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
FR Perm 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Fit Perm 0 934 0 906 0 992 0 925
Satd Flow (perm.) 3511 3398 1536 1430
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summarl/ ,
.77~ .T,1 4 =
Lane Groua EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph.) 703 743 63 33
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 3511 3398 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0 81 081 012 0.12
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2848 2756 188 175
V/C Ratio 0.25 0 27 0 34 019
Critical LG? Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 16 275 270
Prog Factor 0 76 1 00 1 00 1 00
lncr Delay, d2 0.0 00 04 0.1
Delay 1.2 16 279 270
, LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 26°to
Intersection VIC Ratio 28%
Intersection Delay 3 0
lntersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ABW SY4
lnland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Avri125, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
!J1 A 1i
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split (°lo) 31 °!0 28°l0 26°l0 22°!0 16% 27% 20% 31 %
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Spiits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
PO 2 4 3
28 ~18 24
23 25 14 (2$
s ~7
Volume Worksheet
~ I ~ 4 A A .11 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 344 612 209 299 526 189 153 389 194 203 700 348
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Fiow (vph ) 370 658 225 322 566 203 165 418 209 218 753 374
Lane Group Flow 370 971 0 322 846 0 165 658 0 218 790 374
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9b0481PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engmeenng, IPEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ ~ :
. ~ ~I ~ l~.J
~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBa SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/a 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 965 0.964 0 952 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 965 0 964 0 952 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary
tj
Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 971 322 846 165 658 218 790 374
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 019 012 0 23 017 0.28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 496 1331 397 1028 218 836 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 75 0 73 0 81 0 82 0 76 0 79 0 73 0 76 0 42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 225 237 252 266 290 246 270 226 76
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
lncr Delay, d2 42 14 82 39 94 35 61 2.2 02
Delay 267 252 379 31.8 384 28.1 331 24.8 78
LOS D C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length 90
i Lost Trme 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 67%
Intersection V/C Ratio 77%
' Intersection Delay 27 2
Intersection LOS, D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKL{N Apn125, 1996
.
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset- 0(0°!0), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
-'1 ~ , .T ~
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Spltit (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Split 86% 86°l0 14% 14°l0
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 3 0 3.0
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IIJ 2 4
~
13 77
Volume Worksheet .
T, , 1 A . A . y .1 _
EBL E6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 22 1264 12 37 998 12 29 8 48 11 0 12
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 OS 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 OS 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 QO
Adj Flow (vph ) 24 1359 13 40 1073 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
Lane Group Flow 0 1466 0 0 1183 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PBVd SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet .
' 1' I A I
. ~ " 9 . ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdeaiFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1°/6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°la 1%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.999 0 998 0.824 0 830
F1t Protected 0.999 0 998 0 983 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm. 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
Flt Perm 0 789 0 673 0.956 0.910
Satd Flow (perm ) 2966 2527 1482 1421
1
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~J ij l
I
Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Ada Flow (vph ) 1466 1183 92 25
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2966 2527 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph.) 2439 2078 165 158
VIC Ratio 0 60 0 57 0 56 0 16
Critical LG? Yes Yes
, Uniform Delay, d1 21 20 288 27.5
Prog Factor 1 58 100 1 00 100
Incr De{ay, d2 0.3 03 31 00
Delay 37 23 31 9 275
' LOS A A D O
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 6
Sum of Cntica! V/S Ratios 56°l0
Intersection V/C Ratio 60°k
, Intersection Delay 4 2
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacif c Engineenng, TPEC Page 4
'
'
2001
t LEVELS 4F SEItVICE
WITHOUT PR()JECT
i
1
i
1
t
1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary
~ C cle Len9th
Y . 90
Natural Cycle• 150
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
'
Ld E`I I T.I ,_`A IJ
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
, Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
' Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
.9'.1 E-12 1 lq 4 3 .
19 15 12 44
ZO 14 22 134
'
Volume Vllorksheet
1-j +1. ~ .T.~ ~ l~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 207 264 66 182 354 98 101 800 204 116 316 217
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1 05 1.05 1 00 1 05 1 00
' Adj Flow (vph ) 223 284 71 196 381 105 109 860 219 125 340 233
Lane Group Fiow 223 390 0 196 535 0 109 1133 0 125 357 233
1
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
' -
- ~.1 21 .4- Liz] '~1 *11_1 ...`4 ~j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideai Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
~ Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 971 0 971 0850
, Fit Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0 971 0 971 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0950
' Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548
1736 3654 1553
,
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
.
T
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ~ Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 223 390 196 535 109 1133 125 357 233
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0 12 0.19 0.13 021 0 46 010 0 34 0 52
, Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 309 652 328 710 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 72 0 60 0 60 0 75 0 30 0.70 0 72 0 28 0 29
Critica( LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 265 284 25.3 286 227 149 298 163 80
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1.02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 55 1.1 2.1 3.2 01 1 0 90 00 01
Delay 320 29.5 279 301 228 158 388 163 80
' LOS D D D D C C D C B
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical VIS Ratios 62%
Intersection V/C Ratio 72%
~ Intersection Delay 22 2
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
Pl
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN ApnJ25, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
'
' EBT WBT NST SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split (°r6) 84% 84% 16% 16%
' Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 3 0 30 30 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
~T! 2 1..F",~ j 4
14 76 Volume Worksheet
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NB ~~'~SBL SBT SBR
, Volume (vph ) 5 562 3 13 602 14 5 19 13 2 17
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 6 661 4 15 708 16 6 22 40 15 2 20
, Lane Group Flow 0 704 0 0 777 0 0 68 0 0 37
0
1
\¢e
n 43`~ ~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A50 SY4
Inland 1'acific Engineenng, IPEC
Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Mri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ,
[:!j !J-
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other 4ther
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1°/6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/4 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
' Bus Stops (#mr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 821 0•827
Flt Protected 0 999 0 996 0 980
Satd Flow (prot. ) 3759 3747 1538 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 821 0827
Flt Perm 0 926 0 900 0 990 0 915
Satd Flow (perm ) 3480 3376 1529 1424
Capacity and Leve{ of Service Analysis Summary
~ !71 T. Lij
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 704 777 68 37
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 3480 3376 1529 1424
Green Ratio 0 81 0.81 012 012
` Lane Grp. Cap. (vph ) 2823 2738 187 174
V1C Ratio 0 25 0 28 0 36 0 21
Critical LG? Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 16 276 271
Prog Factor 0 72 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. De{ay, d2 00 00 06 01
Delay 11 1.6 28.1 27.1
~ LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 6
Sum of Cntica4 V/S Ratios. 27%
intersection V/C Ratio 29%
' intersection Deiay 3 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9b048\A50 SY4
Intand Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
1
I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle' 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging'? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 28% 26% 22% 16% 27% 20% 31 %
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Spiits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
2 L.y~ 4 3
-a
28.; 20 v8 24,
23 25 14 128 ~
A -r5 -A s ~s Lii 7 ,
Volume Worksheet
EBL E6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 380 643 231 283 546 194 169 430 166 207 772 385
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 449 691 248 304 587 209 182 462 178 223 830 414
Lane Group Flow 409 1034 0 304 875 0 182 672 0 223 872 414
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC page I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLfVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes PVo Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 964 0 964 0.960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Fiow (prot. ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm_ 0 964 0 964 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
--I LFJ .1J .`1 ~ 1 ~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL W6T NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 409 1034 304 875 182 672 223 872 414
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 019 012 0 23 017 0 28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 82 0 78 0 77 0 85 0 83 0 80 0 75 0 83 0 47
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 231 241 249 268 293 247 271 232 78
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 75 21 59 49 158 38 68 42 03
' Delay 306 262 353 330 451 285 339 274 81
LOS D D D D E D D D B
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 72%
Intersection V/C Ratio 83°/a
Intersection Delay. 28 4
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, rPEC Page 2
2~v 1 ~ W o ~r°~ '
,
I pnl 25, 1996
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN A
Timings Summary .
' CYcie Len9th• 90
Natural Cycle. 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~ ~I !J y. I
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 77 77 13 13
Cutt'ertt Sp11t 86% 86°l0 14°l0 14%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & C4NKLIN
IT;2 U1{
13 77
Volume Worksheet ~j !i-
EBL
~ E6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR
Volume (vph ) 24 1299 14 41 1007 14 29 8 52 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93
,
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj. Fiow (vph ) 26 1397 15 44 1083 15 31 9 56 13 0 15
Lane Group Flaw 0 1510 0 0 1199 0 0 96 0 0 28 0
'
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, II'EC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worlcsheet
j ._`A ,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other 4ther Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°rb
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
FR Protected 0 998 0 998 0 821 0 828
Flt Protected 0 999 0.998 0 984 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3751 3747 1520 1522
Frt Perm 0 998 0 998 0 821 0 828
Flt Perm 0 775 0 660 0 954 0 914
Satd. Flow (perm ) 2910 2478 1473 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
7.4 [!:J M ~J
Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm -
Adj Flow (vph ) 1510 1199 96 28
Prot Satd F(ow
Perm Satd. Flow 2910 2478 1473 1424
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2393 2037 164 158
V/C Ratio 0 63 0.59 0 59 018
Cntical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 22 21 289 276
Prog Factor 1 77 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 04 03 38 01
Delay 4.4 24 327 276
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90 ~ Lost Time. 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 58%
intersection V/C Ratio 63%
, Intersection Delay 4 7
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Repoct D\96048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC
Page 4
2001
LEVELS 4F SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
1
I SPRAGUE AVE & SULLfVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
, Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle- 150
Offset. 0(0°l0), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
'
-t 1 ~ A
~ ~ ~I "
~1
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
CutTent Split 21 % 16% 22% 17°l0 24°l0 49% 13°l0 38°l0
Minimum Spfit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
SQlits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULL{VAN
!j t6-: 2 ~4 ~.~3
19 15 12 44
' 20 1 114 22 34
I
5 6 ~ . 8 7 _
Volume Worksheet .
~!j~ Li41~j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR (dBl NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 207 283 66 198 365 103 101 800 231 124 316 217
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93
Lane Uti{ Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adl Flow (vph ) 223 304 71 213 392 111 109 860 248 133 340 233
' Lane Group Flow 223 413 0 213 554 0 109 1164 0 133 357 233
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ASW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 1
I SPRAGUE
AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
*j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.974 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Protected 0.950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 974 0 970 0 968 0 850
Fit Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Fiow (perm.) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
:!J ~ f"l !j- +1 TJ ..."A
' Lane
Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT S6L SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 223 413 213 554 109 1164 133 357 233
' Prot Satd Flow 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0 12 019 013 0 21 0 46 010 0 34 0 52
Lane Grp Cap. (vph } 309 652 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 72 0 63 0 65 0 78 0 30 0 72 0 77 0 28 0 29
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 265 286 256 287 227 151 300 163 8_0
Prog. Factor 1 00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 55 14 31 39 01 1.1 122 00 01
Delay 320 300 292 31 0 22.8 162 42.2 163 80
' LOS D D D D C C E C B
Cycle Length- 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critica! V/S Ratios 64%
Intersection V/C Ratio 74%
' intersection Delay- 22 8
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ASW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
~T J
• ./i,,,/~ (S/Y
1' `
vo
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apnl 25, 199G
Timings Summary ,
' Cycle Length• 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
,
~ ~ ~I -.ij
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84°l0 84°l0 16°l0 16%
~ Minimum Sp1it (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 3.5
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
J,T~ 2 ~ 14
~a
14 76
Volume Worlcsheet
.
il &J ..Ll y - *J.
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ~ 5 615 3 13 633 14 5 19 34 13 2 17
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 6 724 4 15 745 16 6 22 40 15 2 20
' Lane Group Flow 0 770 0 0 815 0 0 68 0 0 37 0
'
~
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A5W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLlN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ,
~I !J1 !J rJ* A y .l .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
' Ideal Fiow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0°l0 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkmg (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 821 0 827
F{t P rotected 0 999 0 996 0 980
Satd Fiow (prot ) 3759 3747 1538 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 821 0 827
Flt Perm 0.923 0 892 0 990 0 915
Satd Flow (perm ) 3469 3346 1529 1424
,
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary
T ~
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 770 815 68 37
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 3469 3346 1529 1424
Green Ratio 0 81 0.81 0.12 012
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2814 2714 187 174
V/C Ratio 0 27 0.30 0 36 0 21
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 16 27.6 271
Prog Factor 0 75 1 00 1.00 1 00
lncr Delay, d2 00 0.0 06 01
Delay 12 1.6 2$.1 271
LOS A A D D
Cycle Lengfh- 90
Lost Time. 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 29%
Intersection V/C Ratio 31 °!o
Intersection Delay 3 1
` Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ASW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Timings Summary .
, Cyc1e Length 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
,
!7j - 1i A y 1
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Laggmg? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Sp4it 31 % 28°l0 26% 22% 16% 27% 20°!0 31 %
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
E-~2 ,..14 113
28 20 18 24
23 25 ~ r 4 IZ$
7
Volume Worksheet .
_ . . . ~ . . .11
. ~ LOJ
.f
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume {vph ) 380 673 231 326 576 207 169 430 209 220 772 385
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1.10 1 10 1 00 1 14 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1.05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 409 724 248 351 619 223 182 462 225 237 830 414
Lane Group Flow 409 1069 0 351 926 0 182 721 0 237 872 414
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PSW SY4
Inland Pac,fic Eng,neenng, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
LFJ .`.4 y : . = ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 965 0 964 0 953 0 850
Fit Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 965 0 964 0 953 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm.) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
:!j L:. ~ !7j t_i _T ~ I L'4 ~j ti
Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 409 1069 351 926 182 721 237 872 414
Prot Satd. Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 019 012 0 23 017 0 28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 496 1331 397 1028 218 837 298 1045 888
V!C Ratio 0 82 080 0 88 0 90 0 83 086 0 80 0 83 0 47
Criticai LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 231 243 257 271 293 251 274 232 78
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay,d2 75 26 14.3 78 158 65 95 42 03
Delay 306 269 445 362 451 316 368 274 81
LOS D D E D E D D D B
Cycie Length 90
, Lost Time• 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 73%
Intersection V/C Ratio 85%
' Intersection Delay 30 4
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P5W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
~
April 25, 1996
~~rSSI SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle* 80
Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
71 H T-I 41
EBT WBT NBT S6T
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2 _
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Cunent Split 86% 86°fo 14% 14°l0
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yeilow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Spiits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
~T 2 4
13 77
Volume Worksheet ~ -f-I H A A +1 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W6R NBL N6T NBR SBL. SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 24 1384 14 41 1092 14 29 8 52 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 105 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 26 1488 15 44 1174 15 31 9 56 13 0 15
Lane Group Flow 0 1606 0 0 1295 0 0 96 0 0 28 0
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481PSW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, CPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
. .
A ~ ~
Ij-+?.. ~ _T...,~ j ~ . ` A ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Othar
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protected 0.999 0 998 0 821 0 828
Fit Protected 0 999 0 998 0 984 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1520 1522
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0 821 0 828
Flt Perm 0 765 0 662 0 954 0.914
Satd Flow (perm ) 2875 2486 1473 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Anafysis Summary
T : ~ .
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1606 1295 96 28
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2875 2486 1473 1424
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2364 2044 164 158
V/C Ratio 0.68 0 63 0 59 018
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 24 22 289 276
Prog Factor 1 73 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 06 05 38 0.1
Delay 48 27 327 27.6
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 62%
Intersection V/C Ratio 67%
' Intersection Delay 5 0
lntersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PSW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
~
~
INLAND PAC1F1C ENGJNEERING, JNC.
~
Apri1 25y 1996
W 0. N0 96048
~ Pat
Harper
Spakane County Fngineering Department
W. 1026 B roadway
Spakane, WA 99260
' Re: Threshold T'raffic Strudy for Heitman Carnine Cammercial Site
Dear P~t
]Bascd uporr our proaect understanding t.lirough c4nversations with you and the sponsor, we have
prepared a brief traffic threshold deterrninatlan for tEs project. This threshold study has been
requested as apart of a rezone application of the property. The pareel is presently zoned $-2,
- Community Business and the rezane request is for B-3, Regional Business
THR~'SHO,LD DFTE1~MINA TID~
~
L INTRC3DUCTIDN
'rhis site is lacated an the north side af Sprague Avenue between Canklin Raad and Steen Road
Directly to the west of #his site is Carnine R.aad, an utiirngroved county right of way. The
surrounding area alvng Sprague Avenue currently enjays B-3 zaning classification. Fraperty ncartli
of Sprague, which does not front on Sprague is zaned UR-3,5, The zone reclassification far this
praperty will enable a slightly different mix of retail, business ar office uses on this site than the
eXlstln"B-2 zone does. The existing zoning is shovvn an Figu.re 1 vvhich is attached.
~
At the present time, the stte is a vacant field, and is not in use for any purpose. No specific use has
been identi[ied for this sste, therefore na sxte plan has been prepared to accompany this rezone
ap,plicatian It is alsv nat known when this site will be built out. There€ore, this atYalysis will loak
at the ane year, five year and Cen year build vut seenarios This site is the rig,ht size and location for
a usage srach as aShopkoIK1VIart/Fred Meyer ar ather major retaiter. This proposed h.ighest and best
use is what the traffic sludy wiil assurne far the site O#her usages are possible but do nat represenz
l1igher traffic generatars A general vicinity map, Figure 2, is attached
~
At tEs time no site pfian for this zone reclassificativn has been pr~~~red, therefore, actual site access
locativns from Sprague are not knovvn. However, access to this site will be by driveway directly to
Sgrague and may also in.clude a driveway to Camine as a secondary access paint, and will be
analyzed as such
747 INe3t 7th • Suice 200 2020 Lafcewood Drive • Suite 205
5pokane. WA 94204 Coeur d'A,lene, ID 838] 4
509-458-6840 ■ FAX 509-458=6844 208-765-7784 * FAX 2Cl#3-769-7277
~
~ HeitrrYan Ca.rnine CommQrrcial Site Tra#'f c Threshold 5tudy
April 25, 1996
Page 2
~
11. ~..~~STING CONDITIONS
' Sprague Avenue is the only stxeet which was scoped to be analyze,d fvr this project. Impacts firom
the Heitrnan Carn'uic comrrrercial site, if any, wiII be analyzed at the followirrg intersectxons:
* Sprague & Sullivan
• Sgrague & Conklin
~ Sra ue Avenue a f
p g , ot.u--lane, tvvo-way, east-vvest principal artenal through the Spokane Valley vvlth
a posted speed lixrdt of35 mph L,and uses throughout it's length are prirnarily cornmercial in nature,
in the vicinity of the site, Sprague has turo lanes in eaeh directian vvith a non-standard {4,6 foot}
center median strip and is bordQred with both large and small businesses.
~ Iff EXIS TING CONDITION - L e v e Is of Servi c e (p er HC14)
Traffic eaurats had been taken at Sprague & Sullivan during A.pril 1996. Traffic counts at Sprague
& Conklin were tacen in 1994 and updated to match the counts at Sprague and Sullivan taken in
Apri1 1996. The existing levels of service at the subject intersections were calculated using the
Synchro Signal Coordination Comguter Prograrn which is based on the 1994 Highway Capacity
~ Manurxl. A sulnmary of the existing levels of servlce at the subject intersections a.re shown in the
following table. The tx-a~'ic valumes used for this report are shown an Figures 3& 4, Existing A.m
(PM) Peak Hour Tzaffic Volumes which are afitached.
Table 1 - Existing Level of ~ervice
t K
' IlNTERSECTION ~VI , .~1V1
.J r .k } , l
r ` 4 (S)ig1iWlif.ed`t
~ ;r-(U,nsi~``k< }"f - - - I',, DELAY L
- . OS,-,. DELA-Y ibS`
Sprague & Suitivan s 18.5 sec c 22 5 sec c
~ ~
Sprague & Cor,.klin TJ 10.2 sec c ~ 48.1 sec N
Both intersections a.re presently func#ioning at LOS C during the AM peak hour. Sprague &
Sullivan is also working at I.C)S C during the PIVI pealc hour. Spr~gue Conklin 1s presently
warking at LOS F in the PM pea.k hour Due to this fact, a warrant analysis was conducted, and it
was discouered that this intersection meets vvarrants for a traffic signal Tt daes not, however, rneet
either Warrant 1 ❑r 2.
~
~ Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 3
~
A condition on the nearby Shelley Lake residential development plat states that at the completion
of 101 homes in this development, that a signal would be required at this intersection. Spokane
County also has a TIB project scheduled to install a traffic signal at this location. Since the Shelley
Lake development is moving forward, and the intersection is now functioning at LOS F and meets
signal warrants, this intersection was assumed to be signalized before the completion of the Heitrrian
, Carnine commercial site.
IV BACKGROUND PROJECTS
The Shelley Lake residential projects was identified for inclusion in this traffic study as contributing
to the transportation system. Therefore, traffic volumes as shown for phase 1 in the DEIS prepared
for Shelley Lake were added to the existing traffic volumes. Also a non site specific traffic growth
factor of 2.5% per year compounded for the one, five and 10-years that this project may take to
' complete was added to the existing volumes to predict the future traffic volumes.
V 7'RIP GEIVERA TION
~
The B-3 - Regional usiness zone has many land uses pernutted under it which will generate traffic
at different rates. However, since ultimate plans for this srte are not defined at this time, this site was
' examined at it highest and best use and therefore, the "ShoPPing Center (820)" categorY from the
Trip Generation Manual, Sth Edition was used as the trip generator for this site. Many other land
uses are possible for this site, however, none will generate tra.ffic to and from the site to the extent
that land uses which fall under the Shopping Center category will. '
' Table 2 shows new trips to the site and trips which are "pass-by" or linked trips New trips are trips
which would not otherwise be on the transportation system except for the potential uses at this site
when it is in operation. Based upon information in Table VII-1 A of the Trip Generation Manual,
' sound engineering judgement and consistent with the existing nearby land uses, it was determined
that 50% of the driveway trips to and from this site would be new trips, and 50% would be "pass-
by" or linked trips. This "pass-by" rate applies only to the PM peak hour since the AM peak hour
~ traffic is assumed to be employee traffic (new trips) and not present until after the AM commute.
Based upon requirements in Spokane County, approximately 25% of raw land available within an
, industrial or commercial development will be converted into square footage for the building on the
site. Therefore, the 9.69 acres which comprise this proposal can support 105,000 square feet of
building area.
, Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
Apri125, 1996
Page 4
1
Table 2- Trip Generation - Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
` AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
' KSF
V'ol. @ Directional Vol. @ Directional -
1.60 trips Disfribution 6.49 trips Distrrbution
per KSF 63% In 37% Out Per KSF 50% Tn 50% Qut
105 168 106 62 682 341 341
New Trips 84 53 31 340 170 170
' Pass-by 84 53 31 342 171 171
Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) ,
KSF Rate Total ADT
105 7,335
New Trips 69.86 3,667
Pass-by 3,668
1 KSF - Thousand Square Feet
VI. TRIP DISTRIBUTI4N (simplified gravity model~
For this analysis, it was assumed that the traffic generated by the Heitman Carnine commerctal site
would ingress and egress from the site approxsmately 50% to/from the east and 50% to/from the west
during the peak hours. In part this distribution is based upon the directional distribution at Sprague
, & Conklin, but also it is based upon the area from which this store will draw. Residential
development is primarily located east and south (west) of this site. Traffic volumes, based on this
distribution, for the peak hours are shown on Figures 5& 6.
'
This land use will carry items which may compete with items at any of the following stores in the
surrounding area: Fred Meyer, Ziegler's Building Center, K Mart, Best, Green Thumb Nursery,
' Sho Ko and Tar et or other nearb stores and is ex
P g y pected to draw from basically the same
population of valley residents. These residents live south of Mission Avenue, west of Henry Road
and east of Evergreen. Motorists who access this site from other parts of the valley, or other parts
of Spokane or Spokane County, would not be new trips, but rather should be considered "pass-by"
or linked trips and are already on the transportation system. Some of the residents within the
primary service area may also be linked trips.
' Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
Apri125, 1996
Page 5
VII. FUTURE CONDITION withlwithout PROJECT - Level of Service
The Heitman Carnine commercial site may be completed within one, five or ten years. Therefore,
the background traffic was compounded at the 2.5% rate as explained previously in this report for
the year, five year or ten year condition during which this project may be completed and the traffic
from Phase I of Shelley Lake was also added. The levels of service expected for these intersections
with the increases expected over the next year, in five years and in ten years without the additional
traffic from the Heitman Carnine commercial site are shown on the following table. The traffic
volumes which the levels of service in the table are based on, are shown in Figures 7- 12.
Table 3- Levels of Service Without the Heitman Carnine commercial site
BUI~.D OUT I'EAIt BACKGROI~I~D ''RA~`FIC
INTERSEC"~'YON
(S)ignaiized AM PM
(i)nsignalized DEY.AY LOS DELAY Y.OS
Sprague & Sullivan S 21.1 sec C 25.9 sec D
1997
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4 1 sec A
~
2001 Sprague & Sullivan S 22.2 sec C 28.4 sec D
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.7 sec A
Sprague & Sul livan S 24.5 sec C 3 5.5 sec D
2006
' Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 6.0 sec B
Table 3 shows the changes in level of service to be expected at these two intersections in the future
' without the additional traffic from the Heitman - Carnine commercial site in operation. Note that
the intersection of Sprague & Conklin is operating at high levels of service as a signalized
intersection. Note also that the intersection of Sprague & Sullivan will be working at LOS D, and
~ that the amount of delay at this intersection will slowly increase as time goes on.
Adding the traffic anticipated to be generated by this proposal to the traffic anticipated in 1997, 2001
and 2006 indicates that the levels of service will be as shown on Table 4. The traffic volumes which
are expected under these conditions are shown on Figures 13-18.
,
Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
April 25, 1996
Page 6
Table 4- Levels of Service with the Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
BUILD OUT YEAR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
INTERSECTXON
(S)igna lized ~
(U)nsignatized bELAY LOS DELAY LOS
Sprague & Sullivan S 21.6 sec C 27.2 sec D
1997
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.2 sec A
Sprague & Sullivan S 22.8 sec C 30.4 sec D
2001
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 5.0 sec A
Sprague & Sullivan S 25.5 sec D 40.4 sec D/E
2006
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 6.6 sec B
With the additional traffic from the project, the level of service at Sprague & Sullivan will change
from LOS C to LOS D during the A.M peak hour if this project is completed 10 years from now At
Sprague & Conklin, the levels of service in the AM and PM peak hour will remain the same.
VIII CONCL USIDNS
From the data collected for this threshold determination, we conclude that the development of the
' Heihnan Carnine commercial site will not impact either the intersections of Sprague & Sullivan or
Sprague & Conklin and that both of these intersections will be functioning at acceptable levels of
service. If the intersection of Sprague & Conklin is not signalized before the completion of this site,
this intersection will continue to function at LOS F. and as traff'ic inereases delay will also increase
'
Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
flprl125, 1996
Page 7
IX. PROPOSED MITIGAlION
The addition of the Heitman Carnine commercial srte project is not anticipated to have any impacts
to the intersections of Sprague & Sulltvan or Sprague & Conklin Therefore, no mitigation is
needed or recommended specifically relating to this project However, since the intersectlon of
Sprague & Conkltn is presently functiorllng at LOS F, and meets signal warrants, it maY be time to
'
exercise the RID option to signalized this lntersection.
After review of this threshold determination please let me know if you have any questions
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering Co
.
Ann L. Winkler, P E.
ALW/alw
encl.
cc* Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
, Bob Brueggeman, Spokane County Engineers
file
'
- ~
0Kf V(3 t -
~ ~N + 4 S 06 • ''~*~'"R - ~
. . - -•..s~..,.t.
~ . Bm3
. ~
R 0A, D I v AAkV C
Rw
, f - FirC ~ " -
ta t i On
! ~ ~ C• ' - ~ o
. URmIS
Ct
C. UR=3*5
,
PROJECT
LOCATION
r
OF
.
-2, URm3*55
.a-L-r
. 't-- . . „ r r~ . t
~ ~ UR•22 B~ !
- ~ ~ 62 ~ - ~
P RAGl1
E g B' UR' -
' ~ _'-~.~►f--- - - ~ " ~ ~ ~ L~ ~
8•3 ,
,
N
I traff vi VIE N~N g-3 ~
~ M g
m
, ~ • ~ ` - _ ~
u R -2 z U R -
- ~
8-2-
URe-22
'
C UR. . O _ UR-3.5 z 4
w
e R ' D'~= E -a)
6 EL LEY~ N' 4~ 0 9 ~
a 1 I ex. . - ; 'I LAKE ~
~ ,.~~..t....,.
_ -Pt
UW3.5
: ;~...L..•.- , ; - • : .
, N Av E - , . . - ~ • . : ~ ~
_ y . . ~
~ - • - - -
9 T" ~ H;-~ H
~
UK
~
I NLAND J FIGURE 1 CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC
E NGINEERING EXlSTING ZONING MAP
TRAFFlC IMPACT IWALY5IS
7 West 7th • Surte 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048 ~
S ane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-68440 `
~
'
2006
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
WI'I'HUUT PROJECT
1
~
1
1
1
1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0°!fl), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~J
Ld ni ji
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16°!0 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s ) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Spt+ts and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
1` 1 EL 2 144 19. 15 12 44
20 1 (14 22 134
'
~ 5 7 ,
Volume Worksheet ,
!J r*1 ..-I ~D ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 234 298 74 208 397 111 114 905 230 131 357 246
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
,
Lane Util Factor 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 252 320 80 222 427 119 123 973 247 141 384 265
, Lane Group Flow 252 440 0 222 601 0 123 1282 0 141 403 265
'
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, TPEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ . ~ ' .
I L&J ~J ]
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
~ Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehicJes 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
, Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 970 0 971 0 850
Fit Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Fiow (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0.973 0 970 0 971 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0950
' Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
21 :21 !2j 11 j'* 4~ . ~ =
1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 252 440 222 601 123 1282 141 403 265
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.18 0 12 019 013 021 0.46 0 10 0.34 0.52
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 82 0 68 0 68 0 85 0 34 0 79 0 81 0 32 0 33
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 270 287 258 289 229 159 301 165 82
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
lncr Delay, d2 106 1 9 38 67 02 20 16.4 0.1 01
Delay 377 307 300 339 231 178 466 16.6 83
' LOS D D D D C C E C B
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 70%
Intersection V/C Ratio 81 %
~ IntersectFOn Delay 24 5
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D \96048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN ~ Annl 25, 1996
,
Timings Summary
, CYcle Len9th, 90
Natural Cycle• 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begrn Of Green
'
~
- ~1 ij ~J
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging'?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split (°!o) 84% 84% 16°l0 16°l0
Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10
Yeilow Time (s } 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8► CONKLIN
~T2 a
14 76
Volume Worksheet .
I A +-I '~I !?j LD &I .LA 4.1 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ~ 5 635 4 14 681 16 5 20 39 14 2 20
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj F1ow (vph ) 6 747 5 16 801 19 6 24 46 16 2 24
~ Lane Group Fiow 0 795 0 0 878 0 0 76 0 0 42 0
'
~
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
1 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLlN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Ftow Worksheet ,
. .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S6R
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl } 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0°l0 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6
, Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0.818 0 823
Flt Protected 0 999 0 996 0 981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1533 1519
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 818 0 823
Flt Perm 0 910 0 887 0 990 0 927
Satd. Flow (perm ) 3420 3327 1523 1435
~
Capaclty and Level of Service Analysis Summary ,
H IJ Al
Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Fiow (vph ) 795 878 76 42
Prot Satd Fiow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3420 3327 1523 1435
Green Ratio 081 0 81 012 012
~ Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2774 2699 186 175
V/C Ratio 0 29 0.33 0.41 0 24
Cntical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 1 7 277 271
Prog Factor 0 71 1 00 1 00 1 00
incr Delay, d2 00 00 08 01
Delay 1 1 17 286 273
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time. 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 31 %
Intersection VIC Ratio 34%
Intersection Deiay 3 2
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
, Cvcle Length 90
Natural Cycie 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ . . .
T
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag*?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Spfit (°lo) 31 °l0 28°fo 26% 22°/6 16% 27°l0 20% 31 °lo
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 3.5 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
E-12 ~d TJ3
28 20 18 24
23 25 14 ~ 2$
5 L:~ s * s J7
Volume Worksheet .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 430 727 261 320 616 218 191 486 188 232 874 435
Peak Hour Factoc 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 782 281 344 662 234 205 523 202 249 940. 468
~ Lane Group Flow 462 1169 0 344 987 0 205 761 0 249 987 468
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apr1t 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
~ . .1 ~
~
~ ~
T
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl} 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane) No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
, Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/a 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
, Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.964 0 964 0 960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 964 0 964 0 960 0 850
Fit Perm 0.950 0 950 0 950 0950
~ Satd. Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612
1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
:!j ~ A !7j Ih. T. ~ . y . ~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 1169 344 987 205 761 249 987 468
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 019 0 12 0 23 017 0.28 0 56
, Lane Grp Cap (vph) 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 93 0 88 0.87 0 96 0 94 0 90 0 84 0 94 0 53
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 240 24.9 256 275 29.8 25.5 276 242 82
Prog. Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 176 51 125 142 31 7 93 126 119 05
Delay 416 299 426 430 61 4 348 402 36.1 87
LOS E D E E F D D D B
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 12
Sum of Cnticai V/S Ratios 82°fo
Intersection V/C Ratio 94%
, Intersection Delay 35 5 Q
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
!
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN e30 April 25, 1996
Timings Summary ,
~ CYcle Len9th. 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
I-~1 l~ _T I IJ
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
, Can Lead or Lag7
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Spfit (°lo) 86% 86% 14% 14°l0 .
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
~
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s. ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLtN
J.T 2 a
13 77
,
Volume Worksheet ,
ij -!~j T &J
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 28 1466 16 47 1140 16 30 8 59 14 0 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93
~
Lane Util_ Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 105 1 OS 1 05 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Fiow (vph ) 30 1576 17 51 1226 17 32 9 63 15 0 17
' Lane Group Flow 0 1705 0 0 1358 0 0 104 0 0 32 0
~ Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
~
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow WoNcsheet
+1 ,.L
~j r _ ,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SBT SBR
1 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 998 0 998 0 818 0 828
Flt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 985 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3751 3747 1516 1522
Frt Perm 0 998 0 998 0 818 0828
~ F1t Perm 0 732 0 639 0 952 0 919
Satd Flow (perm ) 2749 2399 1465 1431
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
--I !j-
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph.) 1705 1358 104 32
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 2749 2399 1465 1431
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 2260 1973 163 159
V/C Rat►o 0 75 0 69 0 64 0 20
Critical LG? Yes Yes
1 Uniform Delay, d1 28 25 291 276
Prog Factor 1 80 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 10 07 55 01
Delay 62 3.2 346 277
~ LOS B A D D
Cycle Length. 90
1 Lost Time- 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 69%
Intersection V/C Ratio 74%
Intersection Delay 6 0
Intersection LOS B
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
~
2006
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
~
~
~
I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary
~ CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle- 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
Ij .~Fl E-- ~ Ij ..LA y.:
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13°fo 38%
~ Minimum Split (s ~ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s) 35 35 35 35 3.5 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 3.0 30 30 30
SPlits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
.1' I 1 I!j 2 L.L~ 4 'r 3 '
19 15 12 44
~
20 114 22 34
~-5 JA6 E1,,.8 1.17
Votume Worksheet
,
L!j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 234 317 74 222 408 116 114 905 257 139 357 246
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 252 341 80 239 439 125 123 973 276 149 384 265
, Lane Group Flow 252 463 0 239 620 0 123 1312 0 149 403 265
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A1OW SY4
Inland Paci6c Engineenng, IPEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
H . Li
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.974 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Fiow (prot ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 974 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary
:!j ' : . T...`l ~j
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 252 463 239 620 123 1312 149 403 265
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0 12 0.19 0.13 0 21 0 46 010 0 34 0.52
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 082 071 073 087 034 081 086 032 033
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
1 Uniform Delay, d1 270 289 261 290 229 161 303 165 8 2
Prog Factor 1 00 1.00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 106 2 5 5 4 8.3 0.2 2 4 221 01 01
Delay 377 31 3 320 357 23.1 185 52.4 166 8 3
LOS D D D D C C E C B
Cycle Length, 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 72%
Intersection V/C Ratio 83%
~ Intersection Delay- 25 5
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481A1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC page 2
2~ l
- SPRAGUE AVE & ~,~s~a o
~ CONKL{N Apn125, 1996
Timings Summary
, CYcle Length* 90
Natural Cycle 80
4ffset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-S6, Begin Of Green
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
, Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84°l0 84°l0 16°l0 16°l0
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 3.5
Lost Time (s ) 3.0 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
$T12 a
ia 7s
~
Volume Worksheet +1..-
EBL E13T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 5 688 4 14 712 16 5 20 39 14 2 20
Peak Nour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0_85 0 85
Lane Uti{ Factor 1 05 1.05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 6 809 5 16 838 19 6 24 46 16 2 24
, Lane Group Flow 0 861 0 0 917 0 0 76 0 0 42 0
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9b04$\AIOW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet ,
1 j' Ei
~ , . _ . . L~ ~J +j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL tdBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°l0 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
6us Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Park+ng (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 818 0.823
Flt Protected 0 999 0.996 0 981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1533 1519
Frt Perm. 0 999 0 997 0 818 0.823
Flt Perm 0 908 0.863 0 990 0 927
Satd Flow (perm ) 3413 3237 1523 1435
,
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary
.y. ~
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 861 917 76 42
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 3413 3237 1523 1435
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 0.12 0.12
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2768 2626 186 175
V/C Ratio 0 31 0 35 0 41 0 24
Criticai LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 1 7 277 271
Prog Factor 0 74 1 00 1 00 1.00
incr Delay, d2 0.0 00 08 0.1
Delay 1 2 1 7 286 27.3
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time- 6
Sum of Critical VIS Rafios 33%
Intersection V/C Ratio 36°la
lntersection Delay 3 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
F"I !2j T -1
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 28°fo 26% 22°/6 16% 27% 20% 31 %
Minimum Split (s } 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTtme(s) 35 3.5 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 3.0 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
2 IL
4 ~.T.. 3
28 20 1„8 24
23 25 14 128
5 H s E1 _ 6 ~ 7
Volume Worksheet
~ ~ ~c-~ IE-. ~ T, : Ll ,y . +j ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume {vph ) 430 757 261 363 646 231 191 486 231 245 874 435
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1.10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 814 281 390 695 248 205 523 248 263 940 468
Lane Group Flow 462 1204 0 390 1037 0 205 810 0 263 987 468
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, TPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ H ~J- `~...11 1' :
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1940 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade (°/6) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 965 0 964 0 954 0 850
Flt Protected 0.950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
FrtPerm 0 965 0 964 0 954 0 850
Flt Perm. 0 950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
L1 !!j
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 1204 390 1037 205 810 263 987 468
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.28 0 24 0 22 019 012 0 23 0.17 0 28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap {vph ) 496 1331 397 1028 218 837 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 93 0 90 0 98 1 01 0 94 0 97 0 88 0 94 0 53
Cnticaf LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 251 265 278 298 260 278 242 8 2
Prog. Factor 1 00 1.00 1 17 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 17.6 6.5 303 238 31 7 173 176 11 9 0 5
Delay 41 6 31.6 61 4 529 61 4 433 454 361 8 7
LOS E D F E F E E D B
Cycle Length 90
l.ost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 83%
Intersection V/C Ratio 95%
Intersection Delay 40.4
Intersection LOS- D
Synchro 2_0 Report D\96048\P1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
, CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
E6T WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Laggmg?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 77 77 13 13
Current Sptit 86°l0 86% 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 3.5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IT12 nti~ 4
13 77
Volume Worksheet ~ -I aj LEJ +--I 'Ij
. .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 28 1551 16 47 1225 16 30 8 59 14 0 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 30 1668 17 51 1317 17 32 9 63 15 0 17
Lane Group Flow 0 1801 0 0 1454 0 0 104 0 0 32 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P l OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
1
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ ~ A . E_ , .
.
- ~ I .t-.1 61 .y l 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpi ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.999 0 998 0 818 0 828
Fit Protected 0 999 0 998 0 985 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1516 1522
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0 818 0 828
Flt Perm 0 726 0 644 0 952 0 919
Satd Fiow (perm ) 2729 2418 1465 1431
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
AdJ Flow (vph ) 1801 1454 104 32
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2729 2418 1465 1431
Green Ratio 0.82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2244 1988 163 159
V/C Ratio 0.80 0 73 0 64 0.20
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 32 27 291 276
Prog Factor 1 70 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 16 1 0 55 01
Delay 70 37 346 27.7
LOS 6 A D D
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 6
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios 73%
intersection V/C Ratio. 78°r6
Intersection Delay 6 6
Intersection LOS B
Synchro 2.0 Report D\96048V' lOW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
~ ► ah ~
. Ft ` {A4S510N ,
aR,~ t
. ~ pl i RO ~ • - p
QOONE
~
~ f
~ MISS(pN 4L
SIKto _ w AVE ALQO °
AYE p
7- e~L a
SN p ~ W` ' °
<
gpptlE j.~ a Y Q_{: ~ cc t41,,
F
1o:j I '
OESUEj ~ c`~ t~y~.--- 9 • gRO~~WAY
/ p {1
o ~vE aM
4 > ~AtAtOo d
0 t,0 m k o
d m Z u~t~OK
a . SPRf~Gf~EI_ d AIK~
Ptoqttss
1f E Cj ' Eiem Q~ ~ ~kl.l.EY wAY 1
Z gPPINGilElO AVC , ALKi AV,-cn
o cc
0
uJ
W ~,~KI ~~~vE d O ~ ~ UAlht _
~ ► ~ , 4
d i m Q Va~LEY `:C wAY ~ 1----"' :u&►K Z O~ G«eaec
j z~ ~,atN R~~ERS~OE i
W
M` L~ r MIIOK Kti0K ~ t,t3 q
~!1110 a_ Z CA > cr-
O < d~ ; J YAIlI SIQE
yAtN ' RtY~ O~ ~ ~ ~ z a L~M
m m ~ ~ t d ~
,iM ~.vE - ` 1
a5iDE < aivEasiDE p,. ~ AV 31
I y (t. ` r = t~
Q SpRp,GUE ,5T ~~w *
A W~ ' < S~N
2N0 ZHO ZKO Q~ ~ ~ m 4TH U~
m x 2N0_ o.~"" K ~vE
~ • LA
"J
~
3Ft0 AvE
)ii0+cj
y m z u`► !tN
,o T L.6iN
6 SlK r
cc
Sttt J ~ 6ttt ~ , .
a
5tH a ,
m ~ T, H A 4 a m s W~._~E1e"► r~jec
.
Q Wt
~ CC. ~J. o, cx*TtotA ~ p~a' Z 9TH ~ %ot n La
~ W J i 1 r 11tti AVE N ~y, ~ 12tM,
I ~ ~ ' t
9rx gTH GY a ~ u ; OtH ~
10jH mi9T W W a ~ Q/ 1"~
> 6 aC q V
O
# W ~ aC
W µ~v kV E Q ra ~
z ~
o ~
~
t3jK
~ '
1 pYE ~
~ `a~ ~W Q ~ 15~N Z iS ri W vt tibtK 1 I
~ Ly..u-~ < Evjerq+c S°~ ~ ~ a t.~ ~trt►+ pR
:x
~
; CC
~ x
~ I1TH ~T'ttt ~ a Q wf
w °
tq(K 9.y 1 P~ ~
tjH y '?J*FVE a ~yt= °I ~ c~' << L
~ cc 141M 3` tf~ ~,,v O o
°a. ar►+ °ao z 8~ak " Zo~ 9 : J ~ ' r
pYE a ~ tarx cr~ Q ~ ~ ~ N ; ~ , ~ .
P~~Y
Ckl 21Sj E a~iUNNrS~ o l u~nciSe :2C~ M~RC~-
"0 ~RNINE ~M
a
°R 0 ~
2i5T _ AV ct Elem ~URE 2
. ~ Q Y515
/00
1 J 4mc IIAP/►cf
■ TR ~ ~,tp, 9a~
~ -,i► INt-gND - v~crNr~ MAP ~c'`'E _
F'p►CiF~~ ~N~
E~1G'IPIEER _s$.~o
7th • su200 F~09.~ (509) 458 --6844~
~ W~t .aA 99204
-
~
~
~
Z Z Z LLI
~ J J Y Z
~ Q Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
,
N 0
~ N ~ h ~
183J, 87 4 ,3
233 ,.,,4> 293 493 -C> 532
Sg 160 3~~ 11
Go O OD ~ ~ N
n ~
~
J
ItE I NLAND ~ ~RE 3 C~IRNINE COMf~ERCI/IL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC DcIST1NG
ENGINEERING AM PEAK HOUR TRAMC IMPACT AN&YSIS
07 west 7uh • suite Zoo (509) 458-6840 ` TRAFFlC VOI.UMES J~ PROJECT N0. 96o4e jo/
pokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
~
~
1
~
~
Z Z Z LLI
,
~ J
Y
J Z w
:D 0 Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
~
336.f" rk. 164 22 J4 Q 12
568 -fl a- 471 1122 -p o- 690
204c:~,a ~ 250 12 -.~7 a 36
4~ 4~Cf
Of O M1 iA rf
+ m t d
-n•-
~
~
~ I NLANQ / nGURE 4 \ ( CARNINE OOMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC oclsTtNG
ENGINEERING PM PEAK HOUR
TRAMC IMPACT ANALY'S1S
west 7m • sufte 200 (509) 458-6e40 ~ TRAFFlC VOLUMES J` Prtw~r t~w. sso~ ,
kane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
\
i
e
Z Z w
~ J Z
,
Y
J Z z
w
~ O U SITE
SPRAGIJE
co
~
Q 5
19 ~ .0-1> 31
~ 16
~
n
N
0/
I NLAND / FIGURE 5 GIRNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC AM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING S(TE GENERATED
TRAFFIC tMPACT ANALY5IS
, wesc ztn • suite 200 (509) 458-6e40 ` TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECT N0. 96048 ~
tone. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
~
Z Z W
.
§ J Z
Y
J Z w
~ O Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
. , ~
,v,n
13
30 -0 Q-- 30 BS ~ 4 85
43
~
n
~
1
'
~
~ I NLAND /00 FlGURE 6 ~ / CARNINE CoMMaRCLA. PRoPEm ~
PACIFIC PM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING I SITE GENERATED 7RAMC IMPACT MIALYSIS ~
wast 7v, • sune zoo (gos) asa-saho TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECT N0. 96048 '
kane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 456-6844of
i
~
/
1
~
~
Z Z Z LLJ
~ --J ~
Y
J Z w
~ 0 Q SffE
U) SPRAGUE C)
r, ~o m
N
~bb ~bb
ss 4 JA Q ia
239 -,U 322 509 ~ 546
39 ~ ~ 165 3 ~ ~ 11
a4r~ ~4~
aN co ^M
n -
'
'
~
~ I NLAND ~ FIGURE 7 CJIRNINE COMMERCUIL PROPEKnf ~
PACIFtC AM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
TRAF'F1C IMPACT ANALY5IS
7 west 7tn • surce 200 (509) 458-6840 ~ WITHOUT PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96o4e ~
kone. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
\
'
~
Z Z W
Z
J Y Z
:D O Q SITE
V) SPRAGUE U U
,
~
3+4 JP4k. 176 22~`~bbQ12
' 582 --p 496 1179,..~ 4:3.- 913
209 czkr ~/o 256 12 37
a4 ~4~V
N m -n N
-n-
~
/
I NLAND ~ FlGURE 8 CARNINE CQMMERCUL PROPERTY
PACIFIC PM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALY5IS
west 7m • surte zoo (509) 458-6840 ~ WITNOUT PROJECT PrtWWT No. 96M
kana, WA 99204 FAX: (508) 458-6844 ~
~
~
~
N :2
N
~ 0 207 98 5J' ~ 14 O O
~ 264 C ~ ~ 354 562 G
~ ~ 602
66 182 3 13
z 6p z w
~ ,J Z
N z ~
~ 0 caj PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE - AVENUE
~
, I -
1
~
~
'
~
NOT TO SCALE
/
I NLAND FlGURE #9
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRnFFIe IMPACT ANALYSIS
1p7 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-684o W 0 P R OJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048 ~
okane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844~ ~ ` / \
~
\
~ N N d ~
f7 r' N ~
0 380 194 24 14 O 0
¢
643 546 1299~ C~ 100;
231czN. ~ 283 14 c, ~j 41
jj~
,4p %4~Qdp° Z w
Q
> J Z ~ .
J ~ c~v M u0'i Y Z
r- ~
_ ~ < IPROJECT SITE
U U
(n
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
~
'
~
:
,
NOT TO SCALE ~
1 i
INLAND FIGURE #10
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
~ ENQINEERiNQ 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS `
, Wast 7t, • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 W/0 PROJ ECT PROJECT N0. sso4a ~ ;
Ikone, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844! ` ~ ~ ;
i
\
r
r
~n
't f) ~ N
n N
N ~
Q
0 234~ ~111 5~ ~16 O O
298 ~ G~ 397 635 ~ C~ 681 w ~
74 206 4 ~ ~ 14
~ i z w
M J Z
Z
o,
~ 0 a PROJECT SIT
E
Cn U U
SPRAGUE AVENUE
_ . . , r.
.
' .
'
~
NOT TO SCALE
~
1 NLAND ~ f FIGURE #11
PACIFIC A. M. P EAK H O U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENCINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLU MES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
f 7 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 w Q P R OJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
one, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844~ ` /
~ / ~
\
O ~
N
r M 04
a p ~218 ~ 16 Q Q
~ 28 ~
727 616 1466=> GI- 1140 Q O
~
~ 261 320 16 47 cr-
Q ~
J ~ Z Z
~
~ 0 U PROJECT S{TE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
!
~ . ;
s
i
~
~
NOT TO SCALE
J
~ INLAND FIGURE #12 ~
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ~
ENGINEERINQ '
2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES rRAPTIc IMPACT ANALYSIS ~
7 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840
S one, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ` W/O PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96~48 ~ i
\ i
E
\
~o
~ M ~ r' .
QI N r r+ ~
~
o- o
a
0 188 ~ 4k, 94 4J' ~ 13 O 258 ~ 333 562 =J <3:=- 5 O
77
59~ ~181 3 ~ ~11
; a4 ~ a4 ~ z Z
J ~f N N ~ M Y
J ~ Z Qf
0 U PROJECT S(TE
SPRAGUE - AVENUE
~
a
NOT TO SCALE
~
I NLAND FIGURE #13
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERT1f
ENGINEERINQ 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC iMPACT ANALYSIS
4 wegt 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 T PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844, \ WI IH PROJECT \1 -o/
~
"N
{
,
~0 O N ~
M ~ N ~
Q ~ ~ ~ Q
~ 344 ~ ~ 189 22 12 ~ 0 0
~ 612 526 1264-=E> 998
209 299 12 37
4 a4~ a4~v z Z ~
~ Y z
z~ Qf
0 U PRO,JECT SITE!
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
~
N4T TO SCALE
~
NLAND FIGURE # 14
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENQINEERINti 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
7 west 7th • Suite 100 (509) 458-6840 W/Q PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844~ \ ~ ` J
~
~
n~ N ~N ~2
cq r-
Q ~ba ~ba a o
0 207 1 Q3 S~ ~ 14 Q Q
~ 283 365 615 =D ~ 633 ~ 0
66 198 3 13
Z G~4~j G~Q~✓j Z W
Q Z
J o°o~ N 'o~ M YI
Z
J Z Olf
cr~i 0. U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
f
~
,
~ s
NOT TO SCALE
o/
/ ~ I NLAND FIGURE #15
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY a
ENQINEERINCi 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALY5IS
4 wesc 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840
W PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
ane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844~ \ j ~ ` J
~ ~
\
,004 N ~ ~
h N
Q ~r4
b~ ~ ~ p o
0 380 ~ ~ 207 24 cfi~ ~ 14 Q Q
I 673 G- 576 1384 - G=- 1092 0 0
231 326 14 41 Cl~ x
~ ~Cf Z W
] J Z
~ S ~ N N 00 tn Z ct
I (aj PROJECT SlTE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
,
a
NOT TO SCALE
~
i NLAND FIGURE #16
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE GOMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENQINEERING 2041 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 N/~ PROJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844~
~
~
'
~
N N ~
N ~ r
~ ~i ~ Y Y g V Q ~
0 234 ~ ~ 116 5~ ~ 16 O O
~ 317 ~ ~ 408 688 ~ G~ 712
74 MZN~ 222 4 14
o N N
Q i J Z
°i Z ~
PROJECT SITE - -
~ ~ 0
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
,
' -
'
'
,
NOT TO SCALE
-0/
INLAND FIGURE #17
PACIFIC A. M. P EAK H O U R CaRNINE COMMERCIAL PROPEfm
ENQINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFiC IMPACT ANALYSIS
4 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-s840 WPROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844/ \ j 1/
~
~
~
~ co
4r, 1-1b p o
0 430 231 28 c::P 16 ~ ~
757 G~ 646 1551-> G~ 1225 ~ ~
261 363 16 47
Q Z W
o°° ~ Y Z
ID N
I'll
OC
( ~U U ~ PROJECT S(TE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
.
~
,
a
NOT TO SCALE
~
I NLAND RcuRE #18 \ ~ \
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGtNEERINa 2006 TRAFFlC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
7 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 45$-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048
kane, WA 99204 FAX• (509) 458-6844~ ~ W` PROJECT
\ /
.
N A.pP
1 NL
-
~ .
'
~
~
'
EXISTING
' LEVELS 4F SERVICE
'
'
,
,
~
~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
, Cycle Length• 90
Naturai Cycle 150
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
I 7~ „'r'I !7J +1 . ~ T
~ .
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split (°fo) 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
, Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35 3.5 35 3.5 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
2 L.Lq 4 _ 3
19 15 12 44
ZO 14 22 34 1
~ 5 ~ 6 IE1 ' S 7
Volume Worksheet
~ . LEJ ~IQy
1 . r,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 183 233 58 160 293 87 89 707 180 99 279 192
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 197 251 62 172 315 94 96 760 194 106 300 206
Lane Group Flow 197 345 0 172 450 0 96 1001 0 106 315 206
'
Synchro 2,0 Report D\96048kAMEX SY4
r_1.._a mrs- n^^- I
,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
L
i - .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFtow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 969 0.971 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Fiow (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0.969 0.971 0850
1 Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
71 1*7r I ~ J I L.' . ~ 1
Lane Group EBl EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 197 345 172 450 96 1001 106 315 206
Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 0.19 013 0 21 0 46 010 0.34 0.52
Lane Grp. Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 708 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 64 0 53 0 52 0 64 0 26 0 62 0 61 0 25 0 25
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 261 282 250 281 225 141 295 161 78
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 3.0 07 12 1.3 01 05 43 00 00
, Delay 29.1 288 267 278 22.6 14.6 33.8 161 7.9
LOS D D D D C B D C 8
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 54%
Intersection V/C Ratio 62%
Intersection Delay 20 7
Intetsection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\AMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
'
File Name AMEX.HCO
Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No. Lanes 0> 2< 0 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0, 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; ;
Volumes ; 4 493 3; 11 532 13; 4 3 29; 11 1 15
PHF ; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; p
MC's M ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's M; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 l.l
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
, Right Turn Minor Road 5.50
2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
~
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -
Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 248 272
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.96 0.98
St_e_p__2_: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 496 545
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1054 1050
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 264 265
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.97
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 257 258
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB Sg
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1042 1048
, Potential Capacity: (pcph) 228 226
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.97 0.96
' Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.97
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.93
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 218 211
~
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
*******~r**********************~*********************************
Intersection Performance Summary
F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS BY APP
NB L 6 218 > > >
NB T 4 257 > 597 > 6.5 > B 6.5
NB R 37 1037 > > >
SB L 14 211 > > >
SB T 1 258 > 389 > 10.2 > C 10.2
SB R 20 1008 > > >
EB L 6 874 4.1 A 0.0
WB L 14 929 3.9 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.5
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Aprtt 25, 1996
Timings Summary
~ CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~
~ A ~Ar I `i y EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
l.eft Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s } 29 26 24 21 15 24 16 25
Current Split 32% 29% 27% 23% 17% 27% 18% 28%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 3.5 35 3.5 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8~ SULLIVAN
~ I 1 E-12 Ll d 3
T.
29 21 16 24
24 26 15 125
5 ~ 6 E1 8 . 7
Volume Worksheet
lq
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 336 568 204 250 471 164 149 380 147 163 581 340
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1.05 1.00 1 05 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph ) 361 611 219 269 506 176 160 409 158 175 625 366
' Lane Group Flow 361 913 0 269 751 0 160 595 0 175 656 366
'
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
~I !J1 I M y J*j„
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideai Flow (vphpf.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/b 1% 1°k
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0,964 0 965 0 960 0 850
Flt Protected 0950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 964 0 965 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0.950 0.950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
I T `4 . ~ I
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Fiow (vph ) 361 913 269 751 160 595 175 656 366
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 29 0 26 0 23 0 20 013 0 23 0 14 0 24 0 53
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 516 1390 417 1089 238 843 258 920 853
V/C Ratio 0 70 0 66 0.65 0 69 0 67 0 71 0 68 0.71 0.43
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 21 7 228 237 25.4 282 241 27.7 236 84
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 21 1 05 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 2.9 08 24 13 49 1 9 47 18 02
' Delay 246 236 31.1 28.0 33.1 260 325 255 86
LOS C C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length• 90
' Lost Time* 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 60%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 70%
Intersection Delay• 25 0
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PMEX SY4
Inland Paclfic Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
File Name PMEX.HCO
Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
'
- ,
No. Lanes ; 0> 2< 0; 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0; 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; ;
Volumes ; 22 1122 12; 36 890 12; 5 3 45; 11 0 12
PHF ; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0
MC' SM ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
' Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
,
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
' -
St-----1-:-RT------------------------------------------------
ep from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 567 451
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.92 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1134 902
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.90 0.95
' TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.85 0.92
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2088 2088
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 65 65
Capacity Adjustment Factor
' due to Impeding Movements 0.78 0.78
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 51 51
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.94 1.00
~
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2076 2078
' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 50 50
Ma j or LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.78 0.74
' Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.83 0.80
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.82 0.74
' Movement Capacity: (pcph) 41 37
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
' HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
'
Intersection Performance Summary
F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App
' NB L 6 41 > > >
NB T 3 51 > 224 > 22.3 > D 22.3
NB R 54 715 > > >
1
SB L 13 37 > > >
73 77.6 F 77.6
SB R 14 818 > > >
EB L 26 562 6.7 B 0.1
WB L 43 422 9.5 B 0.4
intersection Delay = 1.6
'
'
~
'
1
1997
, LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITHOUT PRUJECT
'
,
,
1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Timings Summary
1 CYcle Len9th 90
Naturai Cycle 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
, .
E--1 Li ~j
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Curt'ent Sp(it 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s~ 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 3.0 30 30
SPfits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
.9' 1 It- - 2 1l14 3
19 15 12 44
1
20 114 I 22 134
5 I74 G 8 ~ 7
Volume Worksheet
. . L4
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT IdBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 188 239 59 165 322 89 91 725 184 105 286 197
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util Factor 1.00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 OS 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 202 257 63 177 346 96 98 780 198 113 308 212
' Lane Group Fiow 202 353 0 177 486 0 98 1027 0 113 323 212
~
'
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 1
1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
*j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°/6 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehlCles 4% 4°!0 4% 4% 4% 4°/6 4% 4°!0 4°/b 4% 4% 4%
' Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 970 0 971 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Fiow (prot.) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0 970 0 971 0.850
Fit Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm. ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Anafysis Summary
~I +1 ~ T ' `1 4 1 !ij
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 353 177 486 98 1027 113 323 212
Prot Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.21 0 46 0.10 0 34 0 52
Lane Grp. Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0.65 0 54 0 54 0.69 0 27 0 64 0.65 0 26 0 26
Cntical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
, Uniform Delay, d1 262 282 25.0 28.3 225 143 296 16.1 79
Prog Factor 1 00 1.00 1.01 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 100 1 00
tncr Delay, d2 34 07 14 19 01 06 57 00 00
Delay 296 289 26.8 286 226 149 353 16.1 7.9
' LOS D D D D C B D C B
Cycle l.ength 90
Lost Time- 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 56%
Intersection V!C Ratio 65°r6
' Intersection Delay 21.1
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Aan125, 1996
.
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset. 0(0%), Referenoed to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
4-1
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Laggmg?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84% 84°!0 16% 16%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s. ) 30 3.0 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKl1N
~T 2 ~ 4
14 76
Volume Worksheet ,
.`4 y, ~ I
EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 4 509 3 11 546 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Adj. Ffow (vph ) 5 599 4 13 642 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
, Lane Group Flow 0 638 0 0 704 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
,
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
'
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
I T.1 . r'j , `l y . '0 ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade (°/6) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles (°!o) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6
, Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0.823 0.822
Flt Protected 0.999 0 996 0 981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 623 0 822
Flt Perm 0 935 0 914 0 992 0.925
Satd Flow (perm.) 3514 3428 1536 1430
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Groua EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 638 704 63 33
Prot. Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 3514 3428 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 0.12 0 12
Lane Grp Cap (vph. ) 2850 2780 188 175
V/C Ratio 0 22 0 25 0.34 0.19
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 15 15 27.5 270
Prog Factor 0.73 1 00 1.00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 00 04 01
Delay 1,1 15 27.9 270
' LOS A A D D
Cycle Length. 90
' Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 25%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 26%
, Intersection Delay* 3 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 19604MAB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1496
Timings Summary ,
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
47-1 h 1 LIJ `l =
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split (°/6) 31 % 28°l0 26°/6 22°l0 16% 27% 20% 31 %
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 30 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 30
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULL{VAN
E- 2 L4 4 T13
28 ~0 18 24
23 R5 ~ 14 28
,
~.J7
Volume Worksheet ,
L
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR (dBL MBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ~ 344 582 209 256 496 176 153 389 151 190 700 348
, Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1.00 110 1.10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 OS 1 00 1.05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 626 225 275 533 189 165 418 162 204 753 374
Lane Group Flow 370 935 0 275 795 0 165 609 0 204 790 374
'
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, [PEC Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
' . . . . :
I ~
EBL F-BT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideai Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1940
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°k 0% 0% 0°r6
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkmg (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 964 0 964 0 960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0.964 0 964 0 960 0_850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Anaiysis Summary
,~1 H h ij
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 935 275 795 165 609 204 790 374
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0 22 0.19 012 0 23 017 0 28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph} 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 75 0 70 0 69 0 77 0 76 0 72 0 68 0 76 0.42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 225 236 244 263 29.0 242 268 226 76
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 17 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
incr Delay, d2 42 12 35 26 94 2.1 44 2.2 02
Delay 26.7 248 322 302 384 26.3 312 248 78
LOS D C D D D D D C B
Cycie Length 90
Lost Time- 12
Sum of Critical VIS Ratios. 66%
Intersection V/C Ratio 76°r6
' Intersection Delay 25 9
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle* 80
Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
T 1,II
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Spiit (s.) 77 77 13 13
Curretlt Sp1it (°16) 86% 86% 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 3.5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 3.0 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
$.T12 t;.l a
13 77
Vo{ume Worksheet .
Lq .41 tj .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT yNBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 22 1179 12 37 913 12 29 S 48 11 0 12
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 24 1268 13 40 982 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
Lane Group Flow 0 1370 0 0 1087 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481PB0 SY4
Inland Aacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
21 !7J ~.!?J
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% p% p% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°fo 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parlang (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 824 0.830
Flt Protected 0.999 0 998 0 983 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
Flt Perm 0 787 0.676 0 956 0 910
Satd Flow (perm } 2958 2538 1482 1421
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summarl/
~ F"
Lane Grouc~ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1370 1087 92 25
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2958 2538 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0.82 0 82 0 11 0.11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2432 2087 165 158
V/C Ratio 0 56 0 52 (J 56 0 16
Critical LG'? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 2 0 19 288 275
Prog Factor 1 59 1 00 1 00 1 00
lncr De1ay, d2 0.2 0 2 3.1 0 0
Delay 3.4 2.1 31.9 275
~ LOS A A D D
Cycle Length* 90
' Lost Time 6
Sum of Crrtical V/S Ratios 53%
Intersection V/C Ratio 56%
Intersection Delay 4 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
~
1997
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
1 '
1
'
1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnt 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycte. 150
Offset 0(0°/a), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
T ~ y
' EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag*?
Current Split (s. ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split (°/6) 21 % 16% 22°/b 17% 24% 49% 13% 38°!0
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 3.5 35 35 35 3.5 35 35
LostTime(s.) 30 30 30 30 30 3.0 30 30
~ Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
1 j+-12 L.LA 4 t 13 '
19 15 12 44
20 14 22 134
5 A6 E1 _ 8 7
Volume Worksheet
. ~ 7-~ ~ F. I A* . Ll JJ -
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Volume (vph.) 188 258 59 181 333 94 91 725 211 113 286 197
Peak Hour Faetor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 05 1.05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 277 63 195 358 101 98 780 227 122 308 212
Lane Group Flow 202 375 0 195 505 0 98 1057 0 122 323 212
'
1
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9b048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
I, T. ~I Lq I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
ideai Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°r6 0% 0°r6 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehlCles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°/6 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr.)
Frt Protected 0 975 0.970 0 968 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0.950 0.950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm. 0 975 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Perm. 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
11 ~
~
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBI. WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT S6R
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph. ) 202 375 195 505 98 1057 122 323 212
Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 0.19 013 0 21 0 46 010 0 34 0 52
~ Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 309 653 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 65 0 57 0.59 0 71 0 27 0 66 0.70 0 26 0 26
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Unrform Delay, d1 262 283 25.3 284 225 144 298 161 79
Prog Factor 100 1 00 1 02 4.94 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 34 09 21 2.3 01 0.7 80 00 00
Delay 296 292 278 291 226 15.1 37.8 161 79
' LOS D D D D C B D C B
Cycle Length• 90
, Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 58%
Intersection V/C Ratio 67%
, Intersection Delay 21 6
Intersection LOS. C
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
1 SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN AprH25, 1996
Timings Summary , CYcle Len9th• 90
Naturai Cycle* 80
Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begm Of Green
~ . .
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Spl+t (s. ) 76 76 14 14
Currerlt Split 84°l0 84°fo 16% 16%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time (s ) 35 35 3.5 35
Lost Time (s ) 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
ITI 2 ; 1 d
14 76
Volume Worksheet .
~ ~ A !7j .y -1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL fdBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 4 562 3 11 577 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85
Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 5 661 4 13 679 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
' Lane Group Flow 0 703 0 0 743 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, fPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
!7j . M ij
T
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% p% p%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehlCles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6 1°/0
' Bus Stops (#mr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0.997 0.823 0.822
~ Flt Protected 0 999 0.996 0 981
Satd Fiow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Flt Perm 0 934 0 906 0 992 0 925
Satd Flow (perm ) 3511 3398 1536 1430
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~ .T y =
~
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph.) 703 743 63 33
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3511 3398 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 012 0 12
Lane Grp Cap (vph. ) 2848 2756 188 175
V/C Ratio 0 25 0 27 0 34 019
Critical LG? Yes Yes
' Uniform De(ay, d1 1 5 16 27.5 270
Prog Factor 0.76 1 00 1 00 1 00
incr Delay, d2 00 00 04 01
Delay 12 16 27.9 270
, LOS A A D D
Cycle Length. 90
~ Lost Tirne. 6
Sum of Critrcal V/S Ratios. 26%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 28%
' Intersection Delay 3 0
intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
~ SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
T[mings Summary
Cycle Length- 90
Natural Cycle* 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
A t- .+,_..I m A Jj
EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging7 Yes Yes Yes Yes
, Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Spltt 31 °fo 28% 26% 22°l0 16% 27% 20°!0 31 %
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
~d ~3
2$ ro r 8 24
'
23 S 14 I 128
i~
8 ~ 7
Votume Woclcsheet ,
~ ,1 - ~ ' t'l Ll `j ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 344 612 209 299 526 189 153 389 194 203 700 348
' Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 658 225 322 566 203 165 418 209 218 753 374
Lane Group Fiow 370 971 0 322 846 0 165 658 0 218 790 374
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481PBW SY4
Inland Paci6c Engineering, IPEC Page 1
!
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Ftow Worksheet
' - .
`1 ~ T - ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideai Flow (vphpl } 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
, Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°ib 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.965 0 964 0.952 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0.965 0 964 0 952 0 850
Fit Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm.) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
!?J Ll a .
~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 370 971 322 846 165 658 218 790 374
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0.24 0 22 019 012 0 23 0.17 0.28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 496 1331 397 1028 218 836 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 75 0 73 0 81 0.82 0.76 0.79 0 73 0 76 0.42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 225 237 252 266 290 246 270 226 76
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 42 1.4 82 39 94 3.5 61 2.2 02
Delay 26.7 252 379 31.8 384 28.1 33.1 248 78
LOS D C D D D D D C 6
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 67%
Intersection V/C Ratio• 77%
1 Intersection Delay. 27 2
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
, (~J A,1996
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLI pril 25
Timings Summary
' CYcle Len9th* 90
Natural Cycle- 80
Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-S6, Begrn Of Green
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Spiit (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Spirt 86% 86% 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
2 4
~ ~
13 77
Volume Worksheet
- ~ ~ ~ OL~ I oj
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR SBl SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 22 1264 12 37 998 12 29 8 48 11 0 12
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Fiow (vph ) 24 1359 13 40 1073 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
Lane Group Flow 0 1466 0 0 1183 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPfiC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1 . . . . :
. ~ `f►-. ~ ` E"1 ~ T . rJ* L.L
E6L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1°/6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 998 0.824 0 830
Fit Protected 0 999 0 998 0 983 0 977
Satd Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm. 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
Flt Perm 0 789 0 673 0.956 0.910
Satd. Flow (perm ) 2966 2527 1482 1421
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~ !j- .T.~ .y
Lane Group EBT WBT MBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1466 1183 92 25
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Fiow 2966 2527 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0.82 0.82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap. (vph.) 2439 2078 165 158
V/C Rabo 0 60 0 57 0 56 0 16
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 2.1 20 288 275
Prog Factor 1.58 1 00 1 00 100
Incr. Delay, d2 03 03 31 00
Delay 3.7 23 319 275
LOS A A 0 D
Cycle Length. 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 56%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 60%
' Intersection Delay 4 2
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, 1PEC Page 4
1
'
2001
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITHOUT PROJECT
'
'
1
,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April25, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ 1 A y.~
~ ~ . I ~
EBI. EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 3.5 3.5 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s.) 30 3.0 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
J!J 2 tl 4 ,3 -
19 15 12 44
20 14 22 134
~ 5 8 -~J ?
Volume Worksheet
- '71 Id A Lq . ,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 207 264 66 182 354 98 101 800 204 116 316 217
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1.05 1.05 1 00 1 OS 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 284 71 196 381 105 109 860 219 125 340 233
Lane Group Flow 223 390 0 196 535 0 109 1133 0 125 357 233
1
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481A50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
!7j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°/b 0% 0°r6 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehiCles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkmg (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0 973 0 971 0 971 0 850
Fit Protected 0 950 0.950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0.973 0 971 0.971 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0.950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
1 4, ..y . ±j
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph.) 223 390 198 535 109 1133 125 357 233
Prot Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5322 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0.12 019 013 0 21 0 46 0.10 0.34 0.52
Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 309 652 328 710 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 72 0.60 0.60 0 75 0 30 0 70 0 72 0 28 0 29
Critica( LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 26.5 284 25.3 286 227 149 298 163 8 0
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Defay, d2 5 5 1 1 2 1 3.2 01 1 0 9.0 0 0 0 1
Delay 320 29.5 279 301 228 158 38.8 163 8 0
LOS D D D D C C D C B
Cycle Length, 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 62%
Intersection V1C Ratio 72%
Intersection Delay 22 2
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Timingls Summary
Cycie Length 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-N6-SB, Begin Of Green
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 76 76 14 14
Current Split (°r6) 84% 84°l0 16°l0 16°r6
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Spiits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
ITI 2 U14
14 76
Volume Worksheet .
1A *1 1 Ti Loj `4 =
EBL EBT E6R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 5 562 3 13 602 14 5 19 34 13 2 17
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph ) 6 661 4 15 708 16 6 22 40 15 2 20
Lane Group Flow 0 704 0 0 777 0 0 68 0 0 37 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048~A50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
+1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°fo 1°!0 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr.)
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 821 0.827
Flt Protected 0 999 0.996 0 980
Satd Flow (prot. ) 3759 3747 1538 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 821 0.827
Flt Perm. 0 926 0 900 0.990 0 915
Satd Flow (perm ) 3480 3376 1529 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot. ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 704 777 68 37
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd. Flow 3480 3376 1529 1424
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 0 12 0.12
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2823 2738 187 174
V/C Ratio 0 25 0 28 0 36 0 21
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 16 27.6 271
Prog Factor 0 72 100 1.00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 00 00 06 01
Delay 11 16 28.1 27.1
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 27%
Intersection V/C Ratio. 29%
Intersection Delay 3 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A50 SY4
In(and Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' CYcle Len9th 90
Naturai Cycie* 150
Offset 0(0°to), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 28°!0 26°Jo 22% 16°l0 27°l0 20°l0 31 %
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime{s) 35 35 35 3.5 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 3.0 30 30 30 3.0
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULL{VAN
2 ,1tA 4 3
28 20 pB 24
23 ~ 125 ~ 14 ~ 128 ~
5 lz~ 6 e 117
, .
Volume Worksheet .
I -A `A y .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 380 643 231 283 546 194 169 430 166 207 772 385
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 14 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 105 1 05 1.00 1 05 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 409 691 248 304 587 209 182 462 178 223 830 414
' Lane Group Flow 409 1034 0 304 875 0 182 672 0 223 872 414
'
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Aprit 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
' . ,
`q I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicies 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 864 0 964 0 960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Flow (prot.) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0.964 0 964 0 960 0850
' Flt Perm. 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm.) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
. I-P.--~ ±j I `q
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph.) 409 1034 304 875 182 672 223 872 414
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0.22 0.19 0.12 0 23 017 0.28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap.(vph) 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.82 0 78 0.77 0 85 0 83 0 80 0.75 0.83 0 47
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 231 241 249 268 293 247 271 232 78
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1.18 1.05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 75 21 5.9 49 158 38 68 42 03
' Delay 306 26.2 35.3 330 451 285 339 274 8.1
LOS D D O D E D D D B
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios- 72%
Intersection V/C Ratio. 83%
' intersection Delay 28 4
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
, ,199G
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125
Timings Summary ,
1 CYcle Len9th. 90
Natural Cycle. 80
Offset 0(0°to), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, 6egin Of Green
H T ' 1 0
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Spfit 86°/6 86°l0 14°!0 14%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 3 5 3 5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
i Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IT12 !;14
13 77
Volume Worksheet
~ ~ ~ ~ ~Ij I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 24 1299 14 41 1007 14 29 8 52 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93
~
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 26 1397 15 44 1083 15 31 9 56 13 0 15
Lane Group Flow 0 1510 0 0 1199 0 0 96 0 0 28 0
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9604$\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
,
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
+j .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
ldeal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehiCl2s 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°fo 1°fo 1% 1% 1% 1°i6
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 998 0 998 0.821 0 828
F{t Protected 0 999 0 998 0 984 0 977
Satd Flow (prot. ) 3751 3747 1520 1522
Frt Perm. 0 998 0 998 0.821 0 828
Flt Perm 0.775 0 660 0 954 0 914
Satd Flow (perm ) 2910 2478 1473 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
4-l Ij , y.
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
~ Adl Flow (vph.) 1510 1199 36 28
Prot Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 2910 2478 1473 1424
Green Ratio 0.82 0 82 0 11 0 11
i Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2393 2037 164 158
V/C Ratio 0 63 0 59 0 59 018
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 2.2 21 28.9 276
Prog. Factor 1 77 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 0.4 03 38 01
Delay 4.4 2.4 327 276
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 58%
Intersection V/C Ratio 63%
Intersection Delay 4.7
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P50 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
,
~
Zool
LEVELS (JF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
~
~
~
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timinqs Summary
' CYcie Len9th. 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset• 0(0°rb), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~
1 71 Fj
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Spiit (s ) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16°rb 22% 17% 24°r6 49% 13% 38%
1 Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s) 35 3.5 35 35 35 35 35 35
lostTime(s) 30 3.0 30 30 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 SULLIVAN
J!j 2 Lj 4 LU 319 15 12 44
20 114 22 I 34
,jr 5 -!J19 1 7 -
Volume Worksheet
~
~ ~ ai d 14 y +j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR $BL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 207 283 66 198 365 103 101 800 231 124 316 217
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1.10 1.00 1 05 1.05 1.00 1 05 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph ) 223 304 71 213 392 111 109 860 248 133 340 233
Lane Group Flow 223 413 0 213 554 0 109 1164 0 133 357 233
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A5W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri]25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ I~~ lEj l~ ~ y`
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT N6R SBL SBT SBR
1 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
ldealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
' Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade S 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
H2avy V2hiCles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkmg (#Ihr. )
Frt Protected 0.974 0 970 0.968 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Flow (prot.) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm. 0.974 0 970 0 968 0850
L F!t Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
- --~1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph. ) 223 413 213 554 109 1164 133 357 233
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 019 013 0.21 0.46 010 0 34 0 52
1 Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 72 0.63 0 65 0 78 0.30 0.72 0 77 0 28 0.29
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 265 28.6 256 28 7 227 151 300 163 8 0
Prog. Factor 1.00 1 00 1 02 0.94 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 5 5 1 4 31 3 9 01 1.1 122 0 0 01
Delay 320 300 292 31 0 228 16.2 42.2 16.3 8.0
LOS D D D D C C E C B
Cycle Length: 90
, Lost Time- 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 64%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 74%
' lntersection Defay 22 8
intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D 1960481A5 W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 2s, 1996
Timinqs SummarX .
' CYcle Len9th* 90
Natural Cycle- 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
T~
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Current Spltt 84°l0 84°l0 16% 16°r6
Minimum Sp1it (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 3.5
Lost Time (s ) 30 3.0 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
yT2 ~ a
14 76
Volume Worksheet ,
!J --I A *"I ',-I &I , `4 y .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 5 615 3 13 633 14 5 19 34 13 2 17
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.65 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85
Lane Uti{ Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 6 724 4 15 745 16 6 22 40 15 2 20
Lane Group Fiow 0 770 0 0 815 0 0 68 0 0 37 0
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D \96048\A5W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
c~
Ll
~
. _ ~ . ~ - . . . j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 - 12 12
' Grade 0% 0°l0 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkmg (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0.997 0.821 0 827
Flt Protected 0 999 0.996 0 980
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1538 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 821 0.827
Flt Perm 0 923 0 892 0 990 0 915
Satd Flow (perm ) 3469 3346 1529 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary
E- Ti y- ~
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 770 815 68 37
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm Satd Flow 3469 3346 1529 1424
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 0 12 012
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2814 2714 187 174
V1C Ratio 0.27 0 30 0 36 0 21
Criticai LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 16 27.6 271
Prog Factor 0.75 1 00 1.00 1.00
tncr Delay, d2 00 0.0 06 01
Delay 12 16 281 271
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
, Lost Time- 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios• 29%
Intersection V!C Ratio• 31 %
Intersection De{ay: 3.1
Intersection LOS. A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\ASW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary .
, CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset• 0(0°!0), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
EBL E8T WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Cufrent Split 31 % 28°l0 26% 22% 16% 27% 20% 31 %
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 3.0 30 30 30 3.0 3.0 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
11 F_2 ~ Lq d T 3
1
28 20 ~18 24
23 1 125 1 r 4 1 128 .
FJ5 7 Volume Worksheet ,
1 .1 H _
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 380 673 231 326 576 207 169 430 209 220 772 385
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93
Lane Utii Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 409 724 248 351 619 223 182 462 225 237 830 414
, Lane Group Fiow 409 1069 0 351 926 0 182 721 0 237 872 414
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481PSW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
* I T - ~ I L 4 L~j +j.-
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealF(ow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
, 6us Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#lhr. )
Frt Protected 0 965 0 964 0.953 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0 950 0 950 0.950
Satd Fiow (prot ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 9 787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0 965 0964 0.953 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Anaiysis Summary
4-: ~ " _ Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 409 1069 351 926 182 721 237 872 414
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1767 3586 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd. Fiow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0 24 0.22 019 0.12 0 23 017 0 28 0 56
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 496 1331 397 1028 218 837 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.82 0 60 0 88 0 90 0 83 0.86 0 80 0 83 0 47
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 231 243 257 27.1 293 251 274 23.2 78
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1 18 1.05 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 7.5 26 143 78 158 65 9.5 4.2 0.3
Delay 30.6 269 445 36.2 45.1 316 368 27.4 81
LOS D D E D E D D D 6
Cycle Length• 90
Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios. 73%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 85%
Intersection Delay• 30.4
Intersection LOS D
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PSW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Anrit 25, 1996
Timings Summary ,
Cycle Length• 90
Natural Cycie- 80
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
I 1i 1i
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Curcent Split (°!o) 86% 86% 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time {s ) 35 35 35 35
Last Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE S CONKLIN
IT 2 % 4
13 77
Votume Worksheet .
. -`4 Ij -
r, -
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 24 1384 14 41 1092 14 29 8 52 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Fiow (vph.) 26 1488 15 44 1174 15 31 9 56 13 0 15
Lane Group Flow 0 1606 0 0 1295 0 0 96 0 0 28 0
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PSW SY4
Intand Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & C4NKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
.9' y
~
- .
I ~ ij
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0 821 0 828
Fit Protected 0.999 0 998 0 984 0 977
Satd. Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1520 1522
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0.821 0 828
Flt Perm 0.765 0 662 0.954 0 914
Satd Flow (perm ) 2875 2486 1473 1424
Capacity and Level of Service Anafysis Summary
~ .T ~
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1606 1295 96 28
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd Flow 2875 2486 1473 1424
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0.11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2364 2044 164 158
V/C Ratio 0.68 0 63 0 59 018
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 24 22 289 27.6
Prog Factor 1 73 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 06 05 38 0.1
Delay 48 2.7 327 276
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios* 62%
Intersection V/C Ratio 67%
Intersection Delay 5 0
intersection LOS. A
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P5W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
: i
2006
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITHOUT PROJECT
'
i
i
1
; SPRAGl.1E Al1E & S1.1LLI11AN Apnl 25, 1996
' Timings Summary
~ CYcle Len$th. 90
Nstural Cycfe 150
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced #o phase 2-V1fBT„ Begin Of Green
;71 LIJ A iJ
EBL EBT WBL IIVBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prat Pco# Prat Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 6 3 4 7
Phase Laggtng? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s } 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split (°Io) 21 % 16% 22% 9 7% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Mir~~~um Spl it (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 14 10
Yeibw Time (s ) 35 3,5 35 3.5 35 35 35 35
LastTime(s ) 30 30 30 3.0 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPR.AGLiE A1fE & SULLI1fAN
2 ...44 12 44 20 ~ 14 22 ! 134
I
~5 I:A u 17
vvlume wnrksheet
. . , . ~ . ~ „
EBL EBT EBR V1fSL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR
llolume (vph. ) 234 298 74 206 397 Il1 114 905 230 1 31 357 246
Peak Hour Fac#ar O.93 0.93 093 093 093 093 0.93 093 093 0 93 093 0M
Lane UtiI. Factar 100 110 110 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 105 1 05 1.00 1.05 1 00
Ad). Flow (vph ) 252 320 80 222 427 119 123 973 247 141 384 265
Lane Croup Flow 252 440 0 222 601 0 123 1282 0 141 403 265
~
Synchro 20 Report D 1960481A100 SY4
Inland Paciic Engineenng, [FEC Page 1
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLiVAN , April 25, 1996
Lane and Satura#ed Flow V11orksheat
~7~ ; A !7J IJ- 1*1 1 ,.T I I LA .l .1
EBL EBT EBR WBL 1NBT WBR ►IBL IV6T NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 9 3 0 1 3 0 7 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flaw (vphpf ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1GOO 1900 1900 1940 1500 9900 1900
Shared Lane'? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
~ Lane 1Nidth (f#.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°!0 0% 0~'~6 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeBVy VehlCles (°Io ) 4°In d% 4°l0 4% 4°l0 4% 4°'l~ {4°1'0 4°lv 4% 4%
~ Bus Stops (#fhr.) Q 0 0 0 D 0 4 D 0 0 p 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protectad Q.973 0970 0971 0.850
~ Fit Protected 0.950 0950 0950 0950
Sa#d FlQw (prot. ) 1 736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0973 0970 0971 0850
Flt Pern 0950 0,950 0950 0 950
Satd F low (perrrr ) 1736 5333 9736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
~
Capacity and Level of Service AnaIVsis Summary
1!2j Li $1
Lane Grou(? E3L EBT WBL. 1fVBT NBL MBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or PrQt.? Pro# Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prvt Both
Adj Flow {vph } 252 440 2-22 601 1 23 1282 141 403 265
Prot 5atd Flow 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green RatEa 0. 18 0.12 019 073 021 OAf 010 034 052
~ Lane Grp. Cap {vph.} 309 652 328 709 356 7616 174 1259 819
VrC Ratro 082 o.~8 0.68 085 034 079 081 aM 033
Critical LG'? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Unifarm Delay, dl 27.O 287 25.8 28.3 229 159 301 165 82
Prvg Factor 100 1M 1.fl2 094 1 00 100 100 100 100
incr ❑elay, d2 106 19 3.$ 67 02 2.0 16.4 QA 01
Delay 37.7 307 30,0 3309 231 178 413,15 166 8.3
~ LOS D D D D C C E c 6
Cycle Length 90
~ Last Time 12
Sum ❑f Criticel V1S Ratios, 70#lo
lntersection IflC Rstio. 81°r6
~ Intersection Delay- 24.5
Intersection LOS C
~ Synchro 2 D Report D%0481A 100 SY4
Inland Pacifxc Engineertng, IPEC Page 2
~
' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apn125, 1996
Timings Summary ,
Cycle Length* 90
Naturaf Cycle• 80
Offset: 0(0°to), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~ H
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging'?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 76 76 14 14
Cuttent Split 84°!0 84% 16% 16%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 35 3.5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 3.0 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8► CONKL{N
IT - 2 - a
ld 76
Volume Worksheet .
`
1~1 '~-I ~ .4
Ij =
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 5 635 4 14 681 16 5 20 39 14 2 20
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Adj F1ow (vph.) 6 747 5 16 801 19 6 24 46 16 2 24
Lane Group Ftow 0 795 0 0 878 0 0 76 0 0 42 0
'
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
y j *J1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl } 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade (°i6) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/b 1% 1%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0.997 0.818 0823
, Fit Protected 0.999 0 996 0 981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1533 1519
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 818 0 823
F!t Perm 0 910 0 887 0 990 0 927
Satd. Flow (perm ) 3420 3327 1523 1435
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
'IT - yLane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot. ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph.) 795 878 76 42
Prot. Satd Fiow
Perm Satd. Flow 3420 3327 1523 1435
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 012 0.12
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 2774 2699 186 175
VIC Ratio 0 29 0 33 0 41 0 24
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 17 277 27.1
Prog. Factor 0.71 1 00 1 00 1.00
Incr Delay, d2 00 00 08 01
Delay 1.1 1.7 286 273
' LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios* 31 %
intersection VIC Ratio- 34%
Intersection Delay 3 2
Intersection LOS. A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\A100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset: 0(0°10), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
:!J --1 4"1 +"1 t l..'--'j jj
EBL EBT W6L WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
CuRent Split 31 % 28°Ib 26°!0 22°iU 16°!0 27% 20% 31 °!o
Minimum Spiit (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YeilowTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 3.0 30
~ Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
E--~2 ~4 3
28 20 18 24
23 ~25 14 (28
A5 g .1,17 ,
Volume Worksheet
' ~ - Ij ~ ~ . , . I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 430 727 261 320 616 218 191 486 188 232 874 435
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93
'
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1.10 1 10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 462 782 281 344 662 234 205 523 202 249 940. 468
Lane Group Flow 462 1169 0 344 987 0 205 761 0 249 987 468
~
'
'
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Woricsheet
' . . . . :
Li ~j *j:
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1°k 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.964 0 964 0.960 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm 0.864 0.964 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm 0.950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary
:!j ---I [Ei 'h I.?' ~ y = ~
. ~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 1169 344 987 205 761 249 987 468
Prot. Satd Flow 1787 5440 1787 5440 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0 22 019 012 0 23 0.17 0.28 0.56
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 496 1330 397 1028 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0 93 0.88 0.87 0 96 0 94 0 90 0 84 0 94 0.53
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 249 256 275 298 255 276 24.2 82
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00
incf. Delay, d2 17.6 51 125 142 31 7 93 126 11.9 05
Delay 416 299 426 43.0 614 348 402 36.1 87
, LOS E D E E F D D D B
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time 12
Sum of Criticaf V/S Ratios 82%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 94%
' Intersection Delay 35 5
Intersection LOS D
S nchro 2 0 Re ort y p D 196048\P 100 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
.
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
~
Natural Cycle. 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 77 77 13 13
Current Sp1+t (°lo) 86% 86°fo 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 3 0 30 3 0 30
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IT12 ~ 4
13 77
Volume Worksheet ,
qj.
. ~ _ ~ ~ i..~ . ~ ~ . .
EBL EBT E6R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR
Volume (vph ) 28 1466 16 47 1140 16 30 8 59 14 0 16
Peak Hour Faetor 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1.05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Fiow (vph.) 30 1576 17 51 1226 17 32 9 63 15 0 17
Lane Group Flow 0 1705 0 0 1358 0 0 104 0 0 32 0
~
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P 100 SY4
Inland Paci6c Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri► 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worlcsheet
.
~ -:j., ' "
T
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
ideal Flow (vphpi.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
l.ane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVGhiCIeS(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#Jhr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 998 0 998 0.818 0 828
Fit Protected 0 999 0 998 0 985 0 977
Satd. Flow (prot ) 3751 3747 1516 1522
Frt Perm 0 998 0 998 0 818 0 828
F!t Perm 0 732 0 639 0 952 0 919
Satd. Flow (perm ) 2749 2399 1465 1431
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
7~ !Z1
Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBT.. SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Fiow (vph.) 1705 1358 104 32
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2749 2399 1465 1431
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap. (vph. ) 2260 1973 163 159
V/C Ratio 0 75 0 69 0 64 0 20
Critical LG*? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 28 25 291 276
Prog. Factor 1 80 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 10 07 55 01
Delay 62 3.2 346 277
LOS B A D D
Cycle Length• 90
Lost Time- 6
Sum of Criticai V/S Ratios 69%
Intersection V/C Ratio 74%
' intersection Delay 6 0
Intersection LOS B
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P 100 SY4
lnland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 4
'
2006
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
~
~
SPRACUE A11E & SULLIVAfV Apn125, 1996
Tirrrings Surnrnary
~ CYcle Length 90 ~ ~ .
Natura3 Cycfe- 150
Offset_ D(a°!a), Referenced #o phase 2-WBfi, Begin Of Gre~~
~
~1~~9 .4i U .L4,
~ €BL EBT IAIBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SST
Left Turn T}rpe Prat Pro# Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 ?
Phase Lagging'? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Currerrt Splk# (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 72 34
Current Split (°lo) 21°l0 16alo 22% 1 7°fo 24°`lo 49°l0 13°!n 3$°Io
1Vlinimum Spiat ~ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellawTime(s) 35 35 35 35 35 3.5 35 35
Lost Ti me (s ) 30 30 3. 0 30 30 30 3,0 30
§E~flts and Phases: SPRACUE A1~E & SULLIVAN
: i 4-12 ' ~ 4 3 '
~
19 15 1 2 144
20 T714 1 22 I 134
-!2j a ~ 7 ,
1folume INorksheet
IH ` ~ Lii ~ `
~ . ~4
EBL EBT EBR WBL VIfBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL aBT aBR
~ 11olume (vph.) 234 317 74 222 408 116 114 905 257 139 357 246
Peak Hour Fac#or 093 093 093 0,93 0.93 0 93 093 093 093 0 93 0 93 093
Lane UtiIFactor 100 110 110 900 1.10 1 10 1.00 105 105 1.00 105 100
Adj. F~ow (vph ) 252 349 80 239 439 125 123 973 276 149 384 265
Lane Group Ffaw 252 463 0 239 620 0 123 1312 0 149 403 265
~
~
~
5ynchro 2 0 Repart D 1964481A1 0VW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenrig, IPEC Page I
SPRAGUE AVE & SUILIVAN Apri125, 199G
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
I cl f- L!J- ~ ~ 41 . ,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 974 0.970 0968 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 974 0 970 0 968 0.850
Flt Perm 0.950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
77~ T_ ' `i
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Fiow (vph ) 252 463 239 620 123 1312 149 403 265
Prot. Satd Flow 1736 5338 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0 12 019 0.13 0 21 0 46 010 0.34 0.52
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0.82 0 71 0 73 0 87 0 34 0 81 0 86 0 32 0 33
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 270 289 261 29.0 229 161 303 165 82
Prog Factor 1.00 1 00 1 02 0.94 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00
incr. Delay, d2 10.6 2.5 54 8.3 02 24 221 01 01
Delay 37.7 313 320 357 231 18.5 524 16.6 83
LOS D D D D C C E C B
Cycle Length 90
~ Lost Time• 12
Sum of Criticai V/S Ratios 72%
intersection V/C Ratio 83%
Intersection Delay 25 5
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\A1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
' ,199b
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April25
Timings Summary Cycie Length 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
7-1 ~4771 ' T ' 4.1
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s } 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84% 84°!0 16% 16%
Minimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time (s.) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 3.0 30 3.0 3.0
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 CONKL{N
IN 2 , 1 4
14 76
Volume Worksheet L-!J !J T I A ~ 1 !J,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 5 688 4 14 712 16 5 20 39 14 2 20
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 6 809 5 16 838 19 6 24 46 16 2 24
Lane Group Flow 0 861 0 0 917 0 0 76 0 0 42 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D\9b048\A1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Ffow Worksheet ,
ri 4-.~ ~ jJ ~ L4 . y.*-' I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0°!0 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy VehiCles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 818 0.823
Flt Protected 0 999 0.996 0.981
Satd. Flow (prot.) 3759 3747 1533 1519
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 818 0.823
Flt Perm. 0 908 0.863 0.990 0 927
Satd. Flow (perm ) 3413 3237 1523 1435
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~ A Fq ~J
Lane Group E8T WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph ) 861 917 76 42
Prot. Satd Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3413 3237 1523 1435
Green Ratio 0.81 0 81 0.12 0.12
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2768 2626 186 175
V!C Ratio 0 31 0 35 0.41 0.24
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 16 1 7 277 27.1
Prog Factor 0.74 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 00 00 0.8 0.1
Delay 1.2 17 28.6 27.3
LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical VIS Ratios 33%
4ntersection V/C Ratio 36%
Intersection De1ay 31
Intersection LOS A
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048U 1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' CYcle Len9th 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
t Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 28% 26% 22°/b 16% 27% 20% 31 %
' Mrnimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yeilow Time (s ) 3.5 3.5 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 3.0 30
SQlits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
:!j +-12 Lq 4 T 3 I
29 20 18 24
23 125 1 14 (28
6 E'1 ~g 117
'
Volume Worksheet
1 -P . . :
;.oJ .,t'' , ~ ~ Ll *j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBI. NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 430 757 261 363 646 231 191 486 231 245 874 435
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1.05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 462 814 281 390 695 248 205 523 248 263 940 468
' lane Group Flow 462 1204 0 390 1037 0 205 810 0 263 987 468
'
'
'
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P1OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J► ; .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpf) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0°r6 0% 0°rb
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/a 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 965 0.964 0 954 0.850
Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot } 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0965 0.964 0 954 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT W8L WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph ) 462 1204 390 1037 205 810 263 987 468
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5446 1787 5440 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0.24 0 22 0.19 0.12 0 23 017 0.28 0 56
' Lane Grp Cap.(vph) 496 1331 397 1028 218 837 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.93 0 90 0 98 1 01 0 94 0 97 0 88 0 94 0 53
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 251 265 278 298 260 278 242 8 2
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 17 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 17.6 6.5 30 3 23.8 31.7 173 176 11 9 0 5
Delay 41 6 31.6 614 529 61.4 43.3 454 361 8 7
LOS E D F E F E E D B
Cycie Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 83%
Intersection V/C Ratio 95%
' Intersection Delay 40 4
Intersection LOS. D
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P l OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC page 2
' .
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN apr>> 25, 1996
Timinqs Summary
, le en • 9
Cyc L gth 0
Natural Cycle. 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-S6, Begin Of Green
'
T y
E6T WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Split 86°!0 86% 14% 14°k
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Ye(low Time (s ) 3.5 3.5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 3 0
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 C4NKLIN
~Tj 2 U14 -
13 77 Volume Worksheet
T ~
~ 4-1
~ .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S6T SBR
Volume (vph ) 28 1551 16 47 1225 16 30 8 59 14 0 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Utii Factor 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00
Adj Flow (vph ) 30 1668 17 51 1317 17 32 9 63 15 0 17
Lane Group Flow 0 1801 0 0 1454 0 0 104 0 0 32 0
,
'
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\P 1 OW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~I ~aj A &j
, `q
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
, Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 818 0 828
Flt Protected 0.999 0 998 0 985 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1516 1522
FrtPerm. 0.999 0.998 0 818 0 828
Flt Perm 0.726 0.644 0 952 0 919
Satd Flow (perm ) 2729 2418 1465 1431
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
.y 1 .
Lane Groua EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph.) 1801 1454 104 32
Prot Satd Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 2729 2418 1465 1431
Green Ratio 0.82 0.82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2244 1968 163 159
V/C Ratio 0.80 0.73 0 64 0.20
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 3 2 2 7 291 27.6
Prog. Factor 1 70 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 1 6 1 0 5 5 01
Delay 7.0 3 7 34.6 277
LOS B A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time• 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 73%
intersection V/C Ratio 78%
' Intersection Delay 6 6
Intersection LOS B
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\P10W SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, UPEC Page 4
~
7
~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
Apri1 25, 1996
~
W.O. Na. 96048
Pat Harper
Spokane County Engineering Departrnent
W. 1026 Broadway
Spaka.ne, WA 99260
Re: Threshold Traffic Study for Heitman C$rnine Cnmmercial Site (Madified un June 4,
)
~
1996 to incorparate Spokane CvuntY Engineering DePartment Camments
Dear Pat:
Based upon aur project understanding through conversativns with you and t.he sponsar, we have
prepared a brief traffic ttxeshold determination far this project. TYus threshold stud~ has been
requested as a part af a rezone applicativn of the property. The parcel is presently zoned B-2,
Commun.ity Business and the rezane request is far B-3, Regional Business.
T~RESHOLD ~ETERMINA TION '
~
I INTRODUCTION
~ Thls site is located on the north side of Sprague Avenue between Conklin Road and Steen Road.
Direetly to the west of this site is Camine R,oad, an unimproved cvunty right of way. The
su.rrounding area along Sprague Avenue currently enjays B-3 zoning classif cat1on. Property north
af Sprague, urhich does not front on Sprague is zoned UR-3.5. The zone reclassification for this
proFerty will enable a slightly different mix of retail, business or off°~ce uses ❑n this site than the
existing B-2 zone daes. The existing zvning is shown on Figure 1 which is attached.
~
At the present tirne, the site is avacan# field, and is not in use for any purpose. No speci~ic use has
~ been identified for this site, therefOre no site plan has heen prepared fio accompariy thts rezone
appllcation. It is also not known wl~en this site will be bwlt ❑ut, Therefore, this analysis will loak
a# the ane year, #ive year a.nd ten year build out scenarios TMs site is the rrght size and location for
~ a usage such as aShopkolKMart1F'red Meyer or other majar retailer. This praposed highest and best
use is what the traffic study will assume for the slte. Other usages arre possible but da not reprresent
higher traffic generatvrs. A. general vieinity map, Figure 2, is attached,
At Us tirne no site plan for this zvne reclassification has been prepared, therefore, actW site access
1ocations from Sprague are not known. However, access to tlus site will be by driveway directly to
Sprague and may alsa include a driveway to Carnine as a secondary access paint, and wri11 be arialyzed
as such.
707 West 7th * Suite 200 2024 Lakevt+nad Drive • Suite 205
Spakane, WA 99204 Coeur d`Alene, Id 83814
509-458-6540 • FAX 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 ■ FAX 208-769-7217
' Heitman Carnine Commercial Site "I'raiiic 'I-hreshuld Study
Modified to Inror-porate Count Engineering Department C'o►izments
' June 4, 1996
Page 2
II. L,11S71A'C; C.'UNDI71O.N;S
Sprague Avenue is the only street which was scoped to be analyzed for this project. Inipacts froni
(tlt 11c'11111aI1 CarIllilt' CUI11111t1-ClaI Slif:. 1f a11y, w'ill he imalv7.t'd zl[ (he followinp, lIl[CI'`CCII(lil`:
• Sprague & Sullivan
• ~rrwue S-' C'c,nklin
ti~?r~i~u~ :~~cnu;:, t~~ui-l~ui~, t~~~,-~~ati. ~~~t-~`~a~ ~~ri►l~i~~al ar►~rial tli►~+11~1: tll~~ ~~~~~~.aii~ `'.►11;:~ i!}!
a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Land uses throughout it's length are primarily commercial in natu~-~-- .
In the vicinity of the site, Sprague has two lanes in each direction with a non-standard (4-6 fot~t )
Ctiltcf' nm:d'~1!1 st''Ir Im1Cl ls boi-dCI'c-d w3th both lai",--C .iild ~1T1:1I~ htl~l(1~'~~L'~•.
Ill. vc~ 1:~ 1~11 1cJ.1-[.evel.; uj Set-ti'i~'e (pe). 1i(-':lh
' Traffic counts had been taken at Sprague & Sullivan during April 1996. Although traffic counts
callected at this intersection during May, 1996 by County forces show slightly higher traffic volumes,
there is less than a 10% difference between the two counts, therefore, the traffic volumes used in the
report, as collected in April are considered valid. Traffic counts at Sprague & Conklin were tal:en
in 1994 and updated to match the counts at Sprague and Sullivan taken in April 1996. The existing
levels of service at the subject intersections were calculated using the Synchro Signal Coordinatioii
Computer Program which is based on the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. A summary of the
existing levels of service at the subject intersections are shown in the following table. The traftic
volumes used for this report are shmvn on Figures -3 & 4. Fxisting A1Vi (PM) Peak Hour Traffic
,
Volumes which are attached.
' Table 1- Eaisting Level of Service
INTFRSECTION AM PM
(S)ignatized
,
'
(IDEll.Lrnalized DELAY LOS llELAY LQS
' Sprague & Sullivan S 18.5 sec C 22.5 sec C
Sprague & Conklin U 10.2 sec C 48.1 sec F
~
~ Heitrnan Carmne Cornmercial Site Traffie Threshald Study
Modified to Incorporate Cou.nt Engineenng T3epartnerrt Comments
~ June 4, 1996
Page 3
Bath intersections are presen#ly functivning at LDS C during the AM peak hour. Spragxe & Su11ivan
is also working at uring~ t11e ~'lVI Pea~l~ hour, SPra~e~c Cc~nklin is p~`esently warlcir~g at LOS
~
~,~5 ~ d
F in the PM peak hour. I]ue to this fact, a ruarranfi analysis was conducted, arid it was discovered that
~ this intersection meets warrants for a traffic signal It does nat, however, rneet either Warrant ] ar
2.
~ A conditiorl on the nearby Sbelley Lake residen#ial deuelogrnent plat states that at the completion af
10 1 hornes in this developrnent3 that asignal would be required at this intersectiorr. Spokarre County
a1sa has a TIB project scheduled to unprave Sprague Avenue, however, installing a traffic signal at
tlxis lvcation is nnt part af this project. Since the Shelley Lake development is rnoving farward, and
the intersectian is now functiorvng at LOS F and meets szgnal warrarits, this xntersectian was assumed
to be signalized befare the cotnpletion of the Heit.man. Carnine cornmercial site.
IY BACKGRC?UND PROJECTS
The Shelley Lake residential prajects rvas identified for inclusion in this traffic sfiudy as cantributing
to the transportatfan system. Therefare, traffic volumes as shovvn fnr phase 1 in the QEIS prepaxed
for Shelley Lak.e were added to the existing traffic volmmes for the one year build ou# scenarria. The
Shelley Lake develapment was assumed to be bui1t out for the five and ten year scenarias. The site
generated trip figures from the Shelley LaIce DEIS are attach.ed tv this repart, and fallow the other
figures. Also a non site specific traffic grovvth factor of2.5% per year compounded for the one, five
~ and 10 -Years that this ProJ 'ect nnaY take to comPlete was added to the existing vo1umes to predict the
future traffic volumes.
~
V TRIP GENERA TIOIIT
Tie existing zoning for thi.s parceI is B-2 and rezoning this property to S-3 is requested at this tirne.
Nane af the Iand uses allawed under B-3, which are not allowed under B-2 are big pealc hour
generators. Therefare, this traffic study examines rnore closely the difference between the site's
existing use (none) and it's potential use, whether under it' s present B-2 zoring or the proposed B-3
zaning. It was, hawever, assumed ta be built to comply with B-3 zon_ing regulations.
~ The B-3 - Regianal Business zone has rnany land uses pernitted under it whieh will generate traffic
at different rates. Hovvever, since ultimate plans for this si#e are not deined at this time, this si#e wa.s
exarnined at it highest and best use a.nd therefore, the "Shoppi.ng Center (820)" categary fram the
Tri ~a Ge~teration 1~anual, Sth Edrtron ~vas used as the trip generatar for this site. ll~any other land
uses are possible for this site, hovvever, rrone vvill generate traffic to and frorn the site to the extent
that land uses which fall under the Shopping +Center category wi11.
Table 2 shaws new trips to the site and trips which are "pass-by„ or linked trips. New trips are tfips
which wauld not othervvise be on the transportatian system except fcar the potential uses at this site
when it is in operation. Based upon informatian in Table VII-lA of the Trap ~en~ration Mcrnual,
'
Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study -
Modified to Incorporate Count Engineering Department Camments
June 4, 1996
Page 4
sound engineering judgement and consistent witli the existing nearby land uses, it was determined t11:
50/o ~ of the dnveway tnps to and from this site would be new trips, and 50% would be "pass-by "i.
linked trips. This '`pass-by" rate applies only to the PM peak hour since the AM peak hour traffir
t assumed to he emplayee traffic (new trips) and not present until after the AM commute.
~
Based upon requirements in Spakane County, approximately 25% of raw land available within an
industrial or commercial development will be converted into square footage for the building on the
site. Therefore, the 9.69 acres which comprise this proposal can support 145,000 square feet of
building area. -
Table 2- Trip Generation - Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
4M Pesk Hour PM Peak Hour
~F Vol. n Directional Vol. (a Uirectional
1.60 trips D'estribution 6.49 trips Distribution I
per KSF 63% In 37% Out Per KSF 50% In 50% Out
~
105 168 106 62 682 341 341
New Trips 168 106 62 340 170 170 ~
Pass-by 0 0 0 342 171 171
Averagc Daity Trip Ends (ADT)
KSF ~ Rate ~ Total ADT ~
~ 105 ~ 69.86 7,335 ~
'
KSF - Thousand Square Feet I
i'I. TRIP DLSTRIB UTION (simpl ifted gravity mudel)
~
ror this analysis, it tiras assumed that the traffic generated by the Heitman Carnine commercial site
' would ingress and egress from the site aPProximately 5001% to/fi-om the east and 50% to/from the west -
during the peak hours. In part this distribution is based upon the directional distribution at Sprague
& Conklin, but also it is based upon the area from which this store will draw. Residential
development is primarily located east and south (west) of this site. Traffic volumes, based on this
distribution, for the peak hours are shown on Figures 5& 6.
J
'
1 HClllll:lll 11'i11I1C CullllllCl'L1a1 511C 1 CaII1C 1 lll'Csi1U1j 1iULl\
Modified to Iricorporite C'otint rnLTineering, Derartmcnt C'c>>mimlt:,
' June 4. t
.
7i115 li.111U USC W111 l;an_N` lletlls ~kI11CIl lllaj C0I111)CIc: ll'll llCillS at ~1M vI II1C 10II01% 111~; alOl~C_~, lll ii?:'
surrounding area: Fred Meyer, Ziegler's Building Center, K Mart, Best, Green Thumb Nurser:.
ShopKo and Target or other nearby stores and is expected to draw from basically the sall
population of valle}, residents. These residents live south of Mission Avenue, west of Henry Ro.. ~
and east of Etifergreen. Motorists who access this site from other parts of the valley, or other par-, ,
of Spokane or Spokane County, would not be new trips, but rather should be considered "pass-b`
' or linked trips and are already on the ft~~„~,~~~r~~,1;,,T, ~,~;1c~T-~ ~r•T,,,r~} r~ til;~:'~li~ if~l?Tl t!lc rri, 11?;1t-v
, . i, • l/~. f' i.I I.. %i[: J,1 L~t L 10, "~tlllL wiiilUi.l! 1"A'().1LL 1- L,e1't'i uf JeI"1'ik :The Heitman Camine commercial site may be completed within one, five or ten years. Theretore, tl
background traffic was compounded at the 2.5% rate as explained previously in this report for tl
year, five year or ten year condition during which this project may be completed and the traffic fru!
Phase I of Shelley Lake was also added. The levels of service expected for these intersections wi i'the increases expected over the next year, in five years and in ten years without the additional traft
from the Heitman Carnine commercial site are shown on the following table. 7>> ~ r~:1+ i t,, ~1~~ 7~.
which the levels of service in the table are based on, are shown in Figun ~
T.thhC 1 - 1.c1" "'11 fif Srr-vicr «'itho«t (he [icitrn;11) f :irnine co~mmerc•i;d i<<
BCIILD UL1T YH:AR BAC:KGRUUND TRAFF'CC
INTERSECTION
' (S)igualized AM , PM
(L)nsignalized
DELAY L45 AELAY L()S
r '
Sprague & Sullivan S 21.1 sec C ~ ► >
199?
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.1 sec
. Sprague & Sullivan S 24.0 sec C 30.8 sec I)
2001
' SPrague& Conklin S 4.1 sec A 6.4 sec
Sprague & Sullivan S 27.5
2006
1 i
SpraLiie & C'onkl in S 4.9 scc l c
' Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study -
Modified to Incorporate Count Engineering Department Comment~
June 4, 1996
' Page 6
Table 3 shows the changes in level of service to be expected at these two intersections in the future ~
without ihe additional traffic from the Heitman - Carnine commercia] site in operarion. Note that the
intersection of Sprague & Conklin is aperating at high levels of service as a signalized intersection.
Note also that the intersection of Sprague & Sullivan during the PM peak hour will be working
LOS D until sometime between 2001 and 2406, at which time it will fall to LOS E. Durin,- . . '
peak hour, this intersection will fall from LOS G to LOS D between 2001 and 2006.
Adding the traffic anticipated to be generated by this proposal to the traffic anticipated in 1997, 2001
and 2006 indicates that the levels of service will be as shown on Table 4. The ti-affic volumes which =
are expected under these conditions are shown on Figures 13- ] 8. ;
Table 4- Levets of Service with the Heitman Carnine Commercial Site
BUILll OUT YEAR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
INTERSECTION
(S)ignalized ~ PM
(U)nsignaliZed ~
DELAY LOS DELAY LUS
Spra.gue & Sullivan S 21.6 sec C 27.2 sec D
1997
Sprague & Conklin S 3.1 sec A 4.2 sec A
, Sprague & Sullivan S 24.6 sec C 33.5 sec D ,
2001 '
i
Sprague & Conklin S 4.9 sec A 6.6 sec B , Sprague & Suliivan S 28.9 sec D 43.0 sec E
2006
Sprague & Conklin S 4.9 sec A 6.6 sec B
'
No changes in level of service are expected with the addition of the Heitman Carnine commercial site.
However, if the site is not developed before 2006, the level of service at Sprague & Sullivan during
the PM peak hour will be LOS E.
VIII. CONCL CISIONS
From the data collected for this threshold deternunation, we conclude that the development ot the
Heitman Carnine commercial site will not impact either the intersections of Sprague & Sullivan or
Sprague & Conklin and that both of these intersections will be functioning at acceptable levels of
Heitman Carnine Commercial Site Traffic Threshold Study
Modified to Incorporate Count Engineering Department Comments
June 4, 1996
Page 7
service except that before 2006, the intersection of Sprague & Sullivan during the PM peak hour will
drop to LOS E. If the intersection of Sprague & Conklin is not signalized before the completion of
this site, this intersection will continue to function at LOS F; and as traff'ic increases, delay will also
increase.
IX PROPOSED MITIGATION
The addition of the Heitman Cainine commercial site project is not anticipated to have any impacts
to the intersections of Sprague & Sullivan or Sprague & Conklin. However, the intersection of
Sprague & Conklin, since it is presently functioning at LOS F, and presently meets warrants for a
traffic signal will require signalization. The Heitman - Carnine commercial site will derive a benefit
by having this intersection be signalized. It is further recommended that if the proposal has not been
completed in five years, and it becomes necessary for the traffic study to be updated, that a closer
look at Sprague & Sullivan be taken at that time to determine when and if this intersection is still
projected to function at LOS E.
After review of this threshold determination please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
. ~
Ann L. Winkler, P.E.
ALW/alw
encl.
cc: Buster Heitman, Landmark Builders
John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
' Bob Brueggeman, Spokane County Engineers
file
~
\
SKILX~t
~ ~ N * t S C 6
Bm3
. Q
. '
„ ~ R O^ D A E.
Firc M .
~Pa, +a*iOn ' r -
~ ~ r' ~ • ~ o URn3*5
ec t r-in
~ URcm3.5 -
PROJECT
LOCATION
~
. - ,
URm.3*5 - ' ~
_ ~ r.r~,......~
. _P,• . . ►A .
N UR-22 e B ~
2 ~ -2 n g -2
- -
B -:;m 0-3 ~3-
PRA~Gl1E e- UR-
LEI
-
B3
.
. ~ . B 3 .
v Z 'v N N g -3 N ~ 1~
v 1 + B
. L m= C I►~
-tv--~ - , ~ uR-~z U R-
UR-2 2 8 _2- . ~
c UR ?
. o .
URm15
1 - 1 T ~ i F I R I Or' E-~
1
EL L L j~ N. 4~ O 9 ~
6 IrLAxE '
i~el~. UR=395
' ` .c:..•~: i- : • • - ,
~ N AvE . ' ~ . ~
. ~ - ' • -
T ~ ~ ~1: ~ (j`. H .
J
G ' ~ FlGURE 1 ~ N
~ CARNINE COMMERCLAI. PROPERiY
INLAND
PACtFIc
1 ENGINEERING EXISTING ZONING MAP TRAMC IMpACT ANALYcIg
tpoO7kWest
7th • Suite 200 (549) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048 cne, WA 99204 FAX. (509) 458-6844
m
/AtSSt4tA `
PtT RU J ~ • c
~1% ~ \
r r ~ f
BOOHE
~
CrM'SSIUN c.
A1.DO
~ SltiTO ~ AYE
w
b W °t
AVE C41 SH, P c"c
< W z u, O s o <
BOONE ~ ac C4r+t o
~ESM~T Qa~~pWAY ~
~s ~ A~
a > CAtAlO0
' t
~ az uAL4 ~ o A ~ e
d a~ z M ~
AL~,ow~,. ]z 1
~ gP4itGF;EI_ ~ ALKI
0
° `z - P(ogress
AVE ' ' Cl Elem o
7- . ~v~ ,R u v~LtEY wAY
SvalNGFIEI-o aLKI aVEOv ~
o cc.
~ 'o • ~
t~tJ ~ ALKl pLivE Q CL ' IA AIN ,
~ cr- ~0i. ~ _r....- a
cc
d = '0 ` Q YAI.IEY W~Y ~ t ~y~p1N a
N W < ,,,r- ~n 0 z z ~ Grtenac
N a c/~ a µAiw ar~'ERS~oE z u-
1 ~ W Iz N11O KttO►+ W ittXON v~ ~ m ft J I
~ m~~ m; J u~~K S►oE 0 ~tt! AYE YAtM RN O
N R~vEit5l~f p,. ~1V E Eas~oE eE~ m sp~ acvE ASj ~ ~ , . i i v, W°` ~ STN '
m 4tN
m
4TF4 E
.
cr t
a ,RO AYE ~ ~ u SiN ` ' I+e
. W~ )ao CT
mr ~ N t T„ • 6tN
~ cc d ~TN r
~
StK ~ ;6TH a cl
m z 7-Tt{ Adams ~ JECT
Cn~ Elem ~
O ac fto '
W
Q <y
cr-t ON
I
~ ~ Ut N; A'ST ~ ~ ~
ui CA > i < m I - ~ o ~ AV E ~ ~ p ~ 2 T N'~
~ w ?
< z t~ H cn o
9tH Ct ~ cn pI H, 2i~tK ~
~~tK ti - 1 .u- w / ~
~ IOTN 9'f N ~ 10Tt .~u`'u~ ~ o Q ~
< < W ° iY 0
ac
v tiS~H AVE ~ Z~ tl~*! ~t[K ~ AVE r4
...i- )
yf
ZI Q ~ i m ~ t3TK ° ac
W y~ ~ 1 t 4 i o 14SH
~ N ac~ pVE ~
~ .a m z t5`N ~ ti5 K"' yt ~ ~bTN C~ m1!3~ss-' Z Evergreen ~ Q m 1;...-~ t~tH pA
W m~ jf N.S ; cc 4-
~ 0 = w QP Q~c. o
m ~
t 7 711 1 jT hlCL~
- Qrt7TN 9~
t7TN ~ ~ ~ V V u+'yE a
Z \rr p ~ ~~,~1 ~ ~ t~ Z
. ~ a~c~,tTN D 0
d.tH m z d ,m
~ vqN _ 201 N ~ AYE totK ~r~ ~ ~ ; t N J! C'-
p
5T
~ AvE ~~s
4 Q ~ t' 2 0 ~ 1 4 ~ Q j 1 5~ 21 V W~~ ,y 41 n~p~~
A m i U N N YSf 0 1~. C S zA
AY E / PR`r'
°A unrise 22N0 ! ,,,N1NE Co1JlMERC~-
2t . z1k EteR` RE 2 ~
~ Y51S
~ E~ p, 96048
j1~1~"p►N~CINi''~ M~ ~ ,
PAclr'r ~ r
EN~~N~Ea~N~ ~
. ~~e zo~ (5fl9)t~-~ ~
707LW~ ,WA 992Q'~ FlJ~
1
r
a
~
z Z Z LLJ
~ J
J Y Z
D O Q SITE
U) SPRAGUE
, F ,
~bb A~bb
18J~ Q 87 13
233 •-0 o-• 293 493 ~ t3-- 532
58 ~7 a4~ 160 311
a~00 m ~ inN
n ~
~
~
J
I NLAND ~ FlGURE 3 CARNINE COMYERGJIL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC DcISTtNG
ENGINEERING AM PEAK HOUR TRAMC IMPACT' ANAl.YStS
07 wast 7cn • suite zoo (509) 458-6aao ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES J\ PROJECT N0. 96048 j
~
pokone, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-684-4,ff
~
'
'
`
Z Z Z LLJ
Y
J Z z
~ O Q SITE
~ SPRAGUE U V
n
g~m No::
~bb ~bb
Q, s4 as 12
Sgg --4> *.-471 1122 ~ 4 890
204 ~ 250 12 36
a4rC7~4~
~m~
~
1
/
I NLAND / FIGURE 4 \/CARNINE OOWMERCUL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC oclsnNG
ENGlNEERING PM PEAK HOUR
TRAFFIC IMPACT fWALY5i5
west 7a, • s~,ite 200 (509) ass-seao ` TRAFFiC VOLUMES J` PROJECT N0. 9so~ J
kane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844
~
co
~ ~ Q ol
a 4
0 0
Cif 19 11 53 c'J a 31
5 0
~ cr_
~ 15
; ~ Z W
Z
J N Y Z
J Z lx
~ ~ U PROJECT SITE
'
SPRAGUE AVENUE 53 53
509~ 50%
31 31
~
i
NOT TO SCALE
INLAND FIGURE #5
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENQINEERING SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
J
\'s~ka est WAh99204e 200 F~9)c~ 45a s~~ ` TRAFFI C VO LU M ES PROJECT N0. 96048
~
~
Q~
o ,3 0 0
~ 30 ~ C- 30 85 -J G:- 85
43 w of
Z Q lr j Z Z LLJ
J ~ Y Z
J Z ~
~ ~ U PROJECT SITE
~as Now)
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~o 50%
50~
170 171
(85 NOW)
~
l
,
A.
NOT TO SCALE
INLAND FlGURE #6
PACIFIC P. M. P EAK H 0 U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING SITE GENERATED TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 ~ Spokane~ WAh99 04e 200 FAX9,( ~ 458-6844~ ` TRAFFI C VO LU M ES ~ \ PROJECT N0. 960~ ~
~
~
Z Z Z LLJ
Y
J Z (y
~ O Q SRE
~ SPRAGUE v ~
r, m~
~CO o m
(J N n n
V ~ Y V ~ Y
188J, ~ 89 4,0 Q 13
239 -1J a- 322 509 -p. o- 546
165 3~ /~11
< < m~
oi ev ao - n
n ~
'
f
I NLAND ~ ~RE 7 CARNINE CONMERCtAL PROPERTY ~
PACIFIC AM PEAK HOUR
ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
'iRAF'F1C IMPACT' ANALY5IS
7 west 7tn • suite zoo (W9) 458-6840 W(THOUT PROJECT J` PROJECT N0. 9go48 J
kana, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844J
'
'
'
0
rn ~o ~
M~ -
0 344 czP ~ 168 22 ~ ~ 12 O O
a
79 913
41 1
582 ~ 796
209 264 12 37
z w
►o) rn r- J Z
ao
0 ~n N oo ~ Y
Z ~
u U V PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
,
'
~
'
'
A.
NOT TO SCALE
~ i~=~ I NLAND FIGURE #8 1/
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
Pimi 1
ENGINEERINGi 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707
458-6840 ~Spok ne~WAh992Q4 200 FAX:,(509) 458-ss~. ~ WITHOUT PROJECT J~ PROJECT N0. 96048 J
'
'V
N
n M t~0 I~~ M
Q
~ 207~ ~175 5 ~ ~14 Q Q
w 264 ~J ~ 344 614 ~ 602 ~ ~
66 189 3 S~ 13
~ Q z
Q Z
1~
O N r ~ M M Y z
~ co N
~ U PROJECT SITE
~ U
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
'
;
4
4
t
i
'
1
~
' NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE #9
I NLAND
- PACIFIC A. M. PEAK HOU R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
_ ENQINEERINCI 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • sutte 200 (509) 458-6840 ~/~0 P R OJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
\ Spoicane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ \ J ` J
'
1
'
a~o o ao ~ N
M] CO N
Q 1-lb ~ ~ o 0
~ 380 ~ ~ 237 24 -~p ~ 14 0 0
~ 643 ~ G!;=- 543 1394-> C- 1007 w w
231~ 292 14 41
z w
Q '
' J z
J Y Z
~ 0 U
(n PROJECT SITE
U
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
' .
'
1
~
NoT ro scALE
INLAND 1 ~ FIGURE #10
PACIFIC P. M. P EAK H 0 U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • sutte 200 (509) 458-6840
W~Q PROJ ECT PROJECT N0. 96048
`Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844' \ ~ ` ~
~
~
LO
N ~ W N N ~
Q~ 4Pb1-i~ 4Pb1-i5 o 0
' 0 234czP 4,:. 188 5J, ~16 Q Q
~ 298 ~ ~ 387 a9 687 ~ G- 681 ~ w
74 fi 213 4 S~ 14
Q QU) ~'~~~'j J z
03 ~d' ~ Y ~
N
CY) Z
~ 0 Caj PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
~
'
'
~
'
'
~
NOT TO SCALE
~ 0/
~ i~=~ I NLAND FIGURE # 11
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENCINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 W~0 PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
` Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (549) 458-6844~ \ J ` J
'
'
s
n`
M ~ ~
Q ~~a w ~ o 0
0 430 ~ ~ 261 28 ~ ~ 16 ~ 0
~ 727 c~ ~ 616 1561 1140 ~ ~
261 329 16 47
z W
J Z
° ~
J
N ~ U PROJECT SITE
Z ~
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
~
,
'
i
NOT TO SCALE
~ 0/
INLAND FIGURE #12 1 / \
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERINCi 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048
\ Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ~ W/0 P ROJ ECT \ ~
~
rnoo
~ N ~
Q
0 188~ N94 4~ ~ 13 O O
~ 258 a 333 562 577
59~ 181 3
Q a4~j a4~j J Z
~ rnN ~ Y Z
J ~ z ~
~ 0 U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
'
~
NOT TO SCALE
INLAND FIGURE #13
PACIFIC A. M. PEAK HO U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048
\ Spokcne, WA 99204 FA,c: (509) 458-68440.# ~ WITH PROJECT J~ J
1 ~
O N
M O N ~
0 344 181 22 12 Q Q
~ 612 ~ C~ 526 1264~;J G= 998 ~ ~
209 307 12 37
~j Z W
J Z
~ nnrn ~ N°0 ~ Z Z
J ~ lx
0 U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
~
NOT TO SCALE
INLAND FIGURE #14 1 / 1
PACIFIC P. M. P EAK H 0 U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGiINEERING 1997 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 W~ PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
`Spokane, WA 99204 fAX: (509) 458-6844~ \ / \ J
1
N M
4P
a
0 207 cP ll. 180 5~ ~ 14 ~ O
283 ~ G- 355 667 ~ G- 633
~
66 ~ 204 3 13 ~ ~
a\ a4~Cj p Z W
J Z
N N ~ M M Y Z
m
~ 0
U PROJECT SITE
(n U
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
'
~
NOT TO SCALE
INLAND FIGURE #15 IN
PACIFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENt31NEERINCi 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 w~ PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
\ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ` J ` /
/00 "N
U-) N
~ ~ N
Q ~1 ~ ~ Q o
0 ~380 250 24 ~ ~ 14
~ 673 ~ ~ 573 1479~ ~1092 ~ ~
231 326 14 41
~ Z LLJ
~ r°\ tn i° Y
~ 00 U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
,
i
NOT TO SCALE
~ 0/
~ POF I NLAND FIGURE #16 PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENCINEERING 2001 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 W~ PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
~ Spokane, WA 99204 F/U(; (509) 458-6844, \ J ` J
1
~
N n 00
N
~ N ~
0 234 193 5~ ~ 16 O O
~ 317 ~ ~ 398 744 ~ ~ 712 ~ ~
74 228 4 14
Q J Z
~ ~ N N ~
c., co ao qlr qt Y z
J ~ 0' Z ir
~ ~ U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
I
~
~
i
NOT TO SCALE
~ 0/
NLAND nGURE #17 1 ~ N
PACIFIC A. M. P EAK H 0 U R CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERINC 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suice 200 (sos) 458-6840
PROJECT PROJECT N0. 96048
~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 456-6844~ ` J \ J
/ 411\
,
, tn ~n v
, ~rn M
r'o a
~ 430 274 28 16 Q Q
~ 757 ~ ~ 643 1646~=> ~ 1225 ~ ~
261 372 16 ~ 47 ~Q~z oN ^~r'z
U PROJECT SITE
SPRAGUE AVENUE
~
:
~
,
c
~
~
t
~
~
~
i
NOT TO SCALE
\ 00~
INLAND i ~ FIGURE #18
PACIFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR CARNINE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
ENGINEERING 2006 TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIS
707 west 7tn • suice 200 (509) 458-6840 PROJECT N0. 96048
\ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ` W/ PROJ ECT !
~
_
~
~
C4~
~ ~ c>>S ~ = GVE AvE
z
~
z
0
SP~'GVE AVE
~
~
~ ~ .
2
FOURTN
:
t
~
~
~
•'e,'. ~ o
o
u-
~
~
' 1g1H
r
NpZ 10 SCA
~
"
.
~
Pµ LAK
' r
a~~ p ~
Spot~,pJ`1E. WA`'H
~ ~ F~~
~ _ PH~`SE 1 ~1 A
I~ • ~ vt~oN '"`P._--
, ~ ~
NMe4 ~
~T
~ TR IG
S
1`~ p P~S
g,~. AN
I~ ashin9~
o~c~ana'~ 9g242
ont Sp
youth ~5 10
~ ( 509j
n m
~
N~ ~i 24{5~~ ~ ~
.
A ~ (g)9 ~ SPRAGUE AvE
wN~ Z
° ~
Y
Z
O
SP~G~E A~E ~ v
4
Z
~co J
N r
t
(10)9
A ~
~
. , ~ FpURTH
~
. ~
~ o
1 ~ ~
.r ~ (Z1,~1e ~
~y O
.
' t 161H
r . ~
ti ~ NpT TO sC~
~ tn
, ~ .
~ PIA p~3
_--r ~ SH WAS
N'
.
_ ~ .
w 5P0~ '
FIGVRE
- IC No ~ Tw
R1 TRIp ~CIFu-T~OVA P o~S ,
~ ~,~~~N~ ►J
G
D ASS
I R,I ~,N
to~
woahin9
i
SliGI14
okane. g92~2
SP
~ so 9h 25 Pdt(IR,o~10nt
~..t50 ~
~ -
w '
~L Ap~
Cft
TE ,
'
EXISTING
LEVELS OF SEI2VICE
1
'
'
~
'
1 -
'
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apri125, 1996
'
Timings Summary Cycle Length: 90
Naturai Cycle- 150
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
477~ 1 .64 y .
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49°10 13°l0 38%
Minimum Split (s } 14 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Ye1lowTfine(s.) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s.) 30 30 30 3.0 30 30 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
~ E.-12 a T 3
~
19 15 12 44
ZO 1 114 22 ~ 134
-jr 5 8 I,~► 7
Volume Worksheet ,
' 1 Ld Lti 171 ~ . T - ~
~
I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 183 233 58 160 293 87 89 707 180 99 279 192
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
, Lane Util. Factor 1 00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1.00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 197 251 62 172 315 94 96 760 194 106 300 206
Lane Group Flow 197 345 0 172 450 0 96 1001 0 106 315 206
'
~
i
Synchro 2 0 EZeport D\96048kAMEX SY4
T..t.._.c n...,:r_.. mrr~ n,. I
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
L . ~ ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°/u
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.973 0 969 0 971 0 850
Fit Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot ) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0 969 0 971 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0.950
' Satd. Flow (perm ) 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
, -7
1 .471 .`q , J► ~ ~
. ~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot. ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 197 345 172 450 96 1001 106 315 206
Prot Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5311 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 018 0 12 019 013 0 21 0.46 0.10 0 34 0.52
Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 309 652 328 708 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 64 0 53 0.52 0 64 0 26 0 62 0.61 0 25 0 25
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 261 282 250 281 225 141 29.5 161 78
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 30 0.7 1 2 1 3 01 0.5 4.3 00 0.0
Delay 291 288 267 278 226 146 338 16.1 7.9
' LOS D D D D C B D C 6
Cycle Length 90
' Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 54%
Intersection V/C Ratio• 62%
Intersection Delay 20 7
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\AMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
,
File Name AMEX.HCO
Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
, ' '
, ,
No. Lanes , ~
' 0> 2< 0; 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0; 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; '
Volumes ; 4 493 3; 11 532 13; 4 3 29; 11 1 15
PHF ; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85; .85 .85 .85
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0
MC's ( o) ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
'
'
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
,
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
Step T RT from Minor Street NB Sg
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 248 272
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1008
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.96 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 496 545
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 929 874
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.98 0.99
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB Sg
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1054 1050
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 264 265
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.97
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 257 258
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.98 1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1042 1048
' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 228 226
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.97 0.96
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.97
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.93
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 218 211
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
Intersection Performance Summary
F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App
AiB L 6 218 > > >
NB T 4 257 > 597 > 6.5 > B b.5
NB R 37 1037 > > >
SB L 14 211 > > >
SB T 1 258 > 389 > 10.2 > C 10.2
SB R 20 1008 > > >
EB L 6 874 4.1 A 0.0
WB L 14 929 3.9 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.5
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ ~ ~ H ~ ~1 41 41
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT PBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 26 16 28
Currerrt Split (q6) 31 % 28% 26°6 22% 16% 29g6 18% 31 %
Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Sptits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 SULLNAN
2 t z A { T 3
~
28 20 s 26
23 F
--~s 18 117
Volume Worksheet
~ ~ ~1 'rl H N It, I I r4 41 1*11
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR $BL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 336 568 204 250 471 164 149 380 147 163 681 340
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 4.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1,00 1.05 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 361 611 219 269 506 176 160 409 158 175 732 366
Lane Group Flow 361 913 0 269 751 0 160 595 0 175 769 366
,
~
1
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481PMEX_SY4
lnland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
J
~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1 7-1 tj *i TI rl `4 y1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl. ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0°r6 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heevy VehiCleS 1°!0 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/a 1% 1% 1°k
Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.964 0.965 0.960 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0.964 0.965 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd Flow (perm ) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
T
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph.) 361 913 269 751 160 595 175 769 366
Prot Satd Fiow 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.12 0.26 0 14 0.28 0 56
Lane Grp. Cap (vph.) 496 1330 397 1029 218 923 258 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.73 0 69 0 68 0.73 0 73 0.64 0 68 0 74 0 41
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 223 23.5 24.4 26.1 289 227 277 224 75
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.21 1 06 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 3.7 1 1 3.2 19 8.0 1 1 4.7 1.9 0.2
Delay 26.0 24.5 326 29.4 369 238 325 243 7.7
' LOS D C D D D C D C B
Cycle Length• 90
Lost Time. 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios• 63%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 73%
Intersection Delay- 25 2
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D:\96048\PMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
~
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1
File Name PMEX.HCO
Streets: (N-S) CONKLIN (E-W) SPRAGUE
Major Street Direction.... EW
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ALW
Date of Analysis.......... 4/13/96
Other Information......... EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Alorthbound ; Southbound
; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R
No. Lanes ; 0> 2< 0; 0> 2< 0; 0> 1< 0; 0> 1< 0
Stop/Yield ; N; N; ;
Volumes ; 22 1122 12; 36 890 12; 5 3 45; 11 0 12
PHF ; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92; .92 .92 .92
Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0
MC'S M ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
SU/RV's M; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
CV's (~S) ; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0
PCE's ; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
' Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
'
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
' -
St-------------------------------------------------------
ep 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 567 451
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 715 818
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.92 0.98
Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1134 902
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 422 562
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.90 0.95
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue-free State: 0.85 0.92
Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB
'
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2088 2088
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 65 65
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.78 0.78
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 51 51
Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.94 1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2076 2078
' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 50 50
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0.78 0.74
' Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.83 0.80
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.82 0.74
' Movement Capacity: (pcph) 41 37
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
Intersection Performance Summary
F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS BY APP
NB L 6 41 > > >
NB T 3 51 > 224 > 22.3 > D 22.3
NB R 54 715 > > >
SB L 13 37 > > >
73 77.6 F 77.6
SB R 14 818 > > >
EB L 26 562 6.7 B 0.1
WB L 43 422 9.5 B 0.4
Intersection Delay = 1.6
~
'
'
,
1997
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITHOUT PROJECT
1 ,
~
~
,
1
'
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Timinqs Summary
, CYcle Len9th- 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
1 . .
471 h. . T . L
.4 ~
, EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22% 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Nlinimum Spiit (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 35 3.5 35 35 35 35 35
LostTime(s) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
1+-12 Ll 4 3 ,
19 15 12 44
20 14 22 ,34 -
5 8 7
Volume Worksheet
~ -T . . . . . . :
Ll _ j+j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 188 239 59 165 322 89 91 725 184 105 286 197
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 10 1.10 1.00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1.05 1 00
Adj Flow (vph.) 202 257 63 177 346 96 98 780 198 113 308 212
Lane Group Fiow 202 353 0 177 486 0 98 1027 0 113 323 212
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC
Page 1
I SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
~ . . :
4L: +j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeaVy VehiCles 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°/6 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
~ Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0.973 0 970 0 971 0850
' Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot. ) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1738 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 973 0.970 0 971 0.850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (perm.) 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
E+1 - T I `l ,
1
Lane Group EBL EBT INBL WBT NBL IdBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot ? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph ) 202 353 177 486 98 1027 113 323 212
Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5333 1736 5316 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Perm Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.18 0.12 019 0.13 021 0.46 0.10 0 34 0.52
Lane Grp. Cap (vph ) 309 652 328 709 366 1616 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0.65 0.54 0 54 0.69 0 27 0 64 0 65 0.26 0.26
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 26.2 28.2 25.0 283 225 143 296 161 79
Prog Factor 1.00 1.00 1 01 0 94 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 34 0.7 14 19 0.1 06 57 00 00
Delay 296 28.9 268 28.6 22.6 149 35.3 161 79
LOS D D D D C B D C B
Cycle Length: 90
~ Lost Time 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 56%
Intersection VIC Ratio 65°rb
~ Intersection Delay 21.1
Intersection LOS C
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineennb, IPEC
Page 2
I SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
,
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Naturaf Cycle. 80
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin 4f Green
T _ .y.~
EBT WBT NBT SBT
' Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 76 76 14 14
Current Split 84% 84°!0 16°Io 16°l0
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 30 3.0 30 30
, Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
yTI 2 Wo a
14 76
~
Votume Worksheet .
' Ij A , , , . . ~
EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 4 509 3 11 546 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
, Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0.85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0.85 0 85 0 85
Lane Util Factor 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 5 599 4 13 642 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
Lane Group Fiow 0 638 0 0 704 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
~
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
I SPRAGUE AVE & CON KLI N April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet .
L . ,
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR
, Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°fo 1% 1% 1% 1°k 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Flt Protected 0 999 0 996 0 981
Satd. Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Flt Perm 0 935 0 914 0 992 0925
' Satd Flow (perm ) 3514 3428 1536 1430
,
,
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph. ) 638 704 63 33
Prot. Satd Flow
Perm Satd. Flow 3514 3426 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0 81 0.81 0 12 012
Lane Grp Cap. (vph ) 2850 2780 188 175
ViC Ratio 0 22 0.25 0 34 019
Cntical LG? Yes Yes
~ Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 1.5 27.5 27.0
Prog Factor 0 73 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 00 00 0.4 01
Delay 1.1 15 27.9 270
, LOS A A D D
Cycie Length 90
1 Lost Time 6
Sum of Crstical V/S Rat+os 25%
intersection V/C Ratio 26°l0
~ Intersection Delay- 3 1
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\AB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN tvtay 31, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycie Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
1-t ~ ~ ~ H I T
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prut
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 i
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 3196 28% 26% 22% 16% 27% 20% 31%
Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
~ S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
~ 1 12 4 3
211 ~ 8 1
23 ~ 4 ~ 11
;j 5 H s 1e 117
Volume Woricaheet
1-t I rI H t-I 14h I Fq r'1 I-C'' ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
, Volume (vph. ) 344 582 209 264 496 168 153 389 151 190 700 348
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0_93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 370 626 225 284 533 181 165 418 162 204 753 374
Lane Group Flow 370 935 0 284 786 0 165 609 0 204 790 374
' I
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\96048\PBO.SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
-
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
-:11 1 -.-1 -z I rl *I T. ~1 `l 11 `jl
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°r6 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#Jhr. )
Frt Protected 0.964 0.965 0 960 0.850
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0 950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0.964 0 965 0 960 0 850
Flt Perm 0.950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm.) 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
L
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm or Prot " Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph ) 370 935 284 786 165 609 204 790 374
Prot Satd. Fiow 1787 5440 1787 5446 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Perm Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.12 0.23 017 0.28 0.56
Lane Grp. Cap (vph. ) 496 1330 397 1029 218 843 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.75 0 70 0 72 0 76 0 76 0 72 0 68 0.76 0.42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 225 23.6 246 263 29.0 242 26.8 22.6 7.6
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 18 1 05 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 4.2 12 41 2.4 94 21 44 2.2 02
Delay 26.7 248 33.1 30.0 38.4 26.3 312 24.8 78
LOS D C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 65%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 75%
Intersection Delay 25 9
intersection LOS: D
Synchro 2.0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apnl 25, 1996
.
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle 80
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
--I C'1 .T ~j
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Spiit 86% 86% 14% 14°r6
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 3.5 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 30
Spfits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLiN
~TJ2 14
13 77
Vo{ume Worksheet ,
s ~ Lz~ E-I = J+, ti ~ `q y , !~j
EBL E6T E6R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 22 1179 12 37 913 12 29 8 48 11 0 12
Peak Nour Factor 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93
Lane Utii Factor 1 05 1 05 105 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00
Adj Flow (vph ) 24 1268 13 40 982 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
Lane Group Flow 0 1370 0 0 1087 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
~
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 S Y4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
~ - , . .
:!J -1 tj
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
Flt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 983 0.977
Satd Fiow (prot ) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0 824 0.830
F!t Perm 0 787 0 676 0.956 0.910
Satd Flow (perm. ) 2958 2538 1482 1421
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
~j ,
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1370 1087 92 25
Prot. Satd Flow
Perm Satd Flow 2958 2538 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0 82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp. Cap (vph. ) 2432 2087 165 158
V/C Ratio 0 56 0 52 0 56 0.16
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 20 19 288 275
Prog Factor 1 59 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr Delay, d2 02 02 31 00
Delay 34 21 31.9 27.5
, LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Cntical V/S Ratios 53%
Intersection V!C Ratio 56%
intersection Delay 4 1
IntersecUon LOS* A
Synchro 2 0 Report D\96048\PB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
'
1997
LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
~
1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apnl 25, 1996
Timings Summary
' Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle 150
Offset 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
-t 1 A H `1 . I 1i `A y....
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging*? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s } 19 14 20 15 22 44 12 34
Current Split 21 % 16% 22°/6 17% 24% 49% 13% 38%
Minimum Split (s ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YellowTime(s) 35 3.5 35 35 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
2 1- Ll 4 T _ 3
19 15 12 44
ZO 14 22 134
5 ~6 ~8 7
Volume Worksheet
:!j
. '1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 188 258 59 181 333 94 91 725 211 113 286 197
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93
Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 10 1.10 1 00 1 10 1 10 1 00 1 05 1 05 1 00 1.05 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph ) 202 277 63 195 358 101 98 780 227 122 308 212
Lane Group Flow 202 375 0 195 505 0 98 1057 0 122 323 212
Synchro 2 0 Report D\960481ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, LPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Apn125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
T Li . 4.1 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°r6 0% 0°r6 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4°/6 4% 4% 4°i6 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°r6 4%
6us Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#!hr )
Frt Protected 0.975 0 970 0 968 0 850
Fit Protected 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950
Satd Flow (prot ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm 0 975 0 970 0 968 0 850
Flt Perm 0 950 0 950 0.950 0 950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj Flow (vph.) 202 375 195 505 98 1057 122 323 212
Prot Satd Flow 1736 5344 1736 5316 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Fiow 1553
Green Ratio 018 012 0.19 013 0.21 0 46 010 0 34 0 52
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 309 653 328 709 366 1611 174 1259 811
V/C Ratio 0 65 0 57 0 59 071 0 27 0 66 0 70 0 26 0.26
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 262 283 25.3 284 225 144 298 161 7.9
Prog Factor 1 00 1 00 1 02 0 94 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 34 09 2.1 23 0.1 0.7 80 00 00
Delay 296 29.2 278 291 22.6 15.1 378 16.1 79
' LOS D D D D C B D C B
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time. 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 58%
Intersection V/C Ratio 67%
Intersection Delay 21 6
{ntersection LOS. C
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Timings Summary .
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle* 80
Offset. 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
T ~
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 76 76 14 14
Curtent Split (°Io) 84% 84% 16°Jo 16%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellaw Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 3.0 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
I'f1 2 ±;1°
14 7s
Volume Worksheet .
r* *j .
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W6R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 4 562 3 11 577 13 4 19 31 11 1 16
Peak Hour Factor 0 85 0 85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0 85 0.85
Lane Util Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1.05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00
Adj Ffow (vph ) 5 661 4 13 679 15 5 22 36 13 1 19
Lane Group Flow 0 703 0 0 743 0 0 63 0 0 33 0
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\ABW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 3
' SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN April 25, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
+j
Ij . L4 . . .1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr )
Frt Protected 0 999 0 997 0.823 0 822
Flt Protected 0 999 0 996 0 981
Satd Flow (prot ) 3759 3747 1542 1517
Frt Perm 0 999 0 997 0 823 0 822
Flt Perm 0 934 0906 0 992 0.925
Satd. Flow {perm ) 3511 3398 1536 1430
Capacity and Level of Service Anal,ysis Summary
77~ T y.~
' Lane Group EBT WBT iV_BT SBT
Perm. or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph.) 703 743 63 33
Prot Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3511 3398 1536 1430
Green Ratio 0 81 0 81 012 012
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2848 2756 188 175
ViC Ratio 0 25 0.27 0.34 019
Criticai LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 1 5 1.6 275 270
Prog. Factor 0.76 1.00 1 00 1 00
Incr. Delay, d2 00 0.0 0 4 01
Delay 1 2 1.6 279 270
' LOS A A D D
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time- 6
Sum of Critical V!S Ratios 26°to
Intersection V/C Ratio 28%
Intersection De{ay 3 0
Intersection LOS- A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048kABW SY4
Irtland Pacific Engineenng, TPEC Page 4
1 .
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN ~i~►~ .1. ~~y~>
Timinga Summary
'
Cycie Length: 90
Naturai Cycie: 150
' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced tc phase 2-WBT, Begin pf Green
[---+1 ~ ~ H 1*1 Fti 41 L:~
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 28 25 23 20 14 24 18 28
Current Split 31 % 2896 26% 22% 16q6 27g6 2056 319b
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
i 1 2 4 3
'
~ 5 6 woo L~►j 7
Volume Worksheet
_:J 41 H _I ~ I -tj r~ Lq ~j ~!j
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR BL SBT SBR,
' Volume (vph. ) 344 612 209 307 526 181 153 389 194 203 700 348 ~
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00
' Adj. Flow (vph.) 370 658 225 330 566 195 165 418 209 218 753 374
Lane Group Flow 370 971 0 330 836 0 165 658 0 218 790 374
1
1
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
J
,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
I --I ' -z ' 4-. . ,t-I `il T I rq `l y 1 4' 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
' Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°to 1% 1% 1% 1°rb 1% 1% 1%
~ Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0.965 0 965 0 952 0 850
Flt Protected 0 950 0.950 0 950 0 950
Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5445 1787 5446 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0.965 0.965 0 952 0.850
' Flt Perm. 0.950 0 950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm ) 1787 5446 1787 5446 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summa ,ry
, y. c' ~
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
' Adj Flow (vph ) 370 971 330 836 165 658 218 790 374
Prot Satd Flow 1787 5446 1787 5446 1787 3582 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd Ftow 1599
Green Ratio 0 28 0.24 0 22 0.19 0.12 0 23 017 0.28 0.56
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 496 1331 397 1029 218 836 298 1045 888
V/C Ratio 0.75 0 73 0 83 0 81 0.76 0.79 0 73 0.76 0.42
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 225 23.7 25.4 266 290 246 270 226 76
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1 18 1.05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 42 1.4 9.6 3.6 9.4 3.5 61 2.2 0.2
' Delay 26.7 252 39.5 31.4 38.4 28.1 33.1 248 7.8
LOS D C D D D D D C B
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time. 12
Sum of Criticai V/S Ratios- 67%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 77%
' intersection Delay- 27.2
Intersection LOS. D
Synchro 2.0 Report D•\96048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 2
, SPRAGUE AVE & CO N KLI N April 25, 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length 90
Natural Cycle- 80
Offset• 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
' -
.T..y :
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Splst (s ) 77 77 13 13
Current Spl+t 86°!0 86°l0 14% 14%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s ) 35 35 35 35
Lost Time (s ) 3 0 3 0 3 0 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8► CONKLIN
2 4
13 77
Volume Worksheet
' ~ : - E-- f ~ E-, T ~ A .
~ . .
EBL EBT E6R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 22 1264 12 37 998 12 29 8 48 11 0 12
Peak Hour Factor 0 93 0 93 0 93 0.93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93 0 93
Lane Uttil Factor 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 05 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00
Adj. Flow (vph ) 24 1359 13 40 1073 13 31 9 52 12 0 13
Lane Group Fiow 0 1466 0 0 1183 0 0 92 0 0 25 0
'
,
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, iPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Apri125, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1 - - _
+-I l~ I~~~ I
, ; . T j ~9 . 41 _ 4] 1
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
IdealFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1°r6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°/6
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr.)
Frt Protected 0 999 0.998 0 824 0.830
Flt Protected 0 999 0 998 0 983 0 977
Satd Flow (prot ) 3755 3747 1524 1525
Frt Perm 0 999 0 998 0 824 0 830
F!t Perm 0.789 0 673 0 956 0 910
Satd. Fiow (perm ) 2966 2527 1482 1421
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
E--
Lane Group EBT WBT MBT SBT
Perm or Prot ? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj Flow (vph ) 1466 1183 92 25
Prot Satd Flow
Perm Satd. Flow 2966 2527 1482 1421
Green Ratio 0.82 0 82 0 11 0 11
Lane Grp Cap (vph ) 2439 2078 165 158
V/C Ratio 0 60 0 57 0 56 0.16
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 21 2.0 288 275
Prog Factor 1 58 100 100 1.00
Incr Delay, d2 03 03 3.1 0.0
Delay 3.7 23 31.9 275
, LOS A A D D
Cycle Length 90
Lost Time 6
Sum of Critical V!S Ratios 56%
Intersection V/C Ratio. 60°r6
Intersection Delay 4 2
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2 0 Report D 196048\PBW SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
2001
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITHUUT PR4JECT
1
~
~
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Mav 3 1. 1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset: 22 (24%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~ H -fl U 141
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag'?
CurTent Split (s. ) 74 i 0 20 20
CuRent Split (9~) 78% 78% 22g6 229+6
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 3.0 30 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
It 2 ~ 4
ONE
Volume Worksheet
~ A ~ A ~ ~ I J&j A ~ U
ESL E6T EOR WIBL WBT WBR N8L NBT NBR SR& BT BR
Volume (vph. ) 5 614 3 13 602 14 82 3 37 13 2 17
Peak Haur Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0_85
Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 6 722 4 15 708 16 96 4 44 15 2 20
Lane Group Flow 0 768 0 0 777 0 0 144 0 0 37 0
'
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481A50.SY4
lnland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AV~ & CONKLIN May 31, 1996
Lane and ~atur~ted Flow Workshoet
EBL EBT EBR 1N8L 'IJVBT 1NBR MBL NBT NBR 56L _~BT SBR
~ Lanes 0 2 0 C~ 2 0 0 1 4 ~ 0 f fl
IdeaF Flow (vphpl. ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared l.ane? Y'es Yes Yes Yes Yes ld'es Yes Yes
~ Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% D% 4% 0%
Area Type Other Other Olher O#her
Heavy VehiCIeS M 1 % 1% I % 1 % 1% 1 °!0 1 % 1 °,Pd 1 % 1 % 1 1 %
Bus Stops (#lhr. ) 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr.)
F~t P'rvtecked 0.999 0.997 0.859 0.827
F It Protected 0.999 0.%8 0.980
Satd. Flow (prot.) 3759 3747 1554 1525
FrC Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.859 0.827
Fit P'efr'I''!, 0.329 OMI 0.875 0.874
Sstd. Flornr (perm_ ) 3492 3342 1414 1360
Capacity and Level of Serrtice Analysis SummarY
-u Lil
Lane qroup EBT WBT NBT SBT
perm. or Prof.? R+erm Perm Perm Perm
~ Ad}. Flcaw (vph.) 768 777 144 37
F'rot. aatd. Flvw
Perm. Satd. f Iow 3492 3342 1414 1360
Green Ratio 0.74 O.74 0.19 0. 19
Lane Grp. CaoR• (vPh.) 2600 2488 267 257
V/C Ratin 0.30 0.31 0.54 0.14
Critical LG? Yr s Yes
~ Llniform OeIay, dl 2.9 2.3 25.0 23,1
Prog. Fac#vr 0.00 1.00 1.00 7.00
Incr. i3eFay, d2 O,O 0.0 1.7 0.0
Qelay 0.0 Z9 26_7 23_1
~ LOS A A 0 c
Cy►cfe Length: 90
~ Lost Ticne: 6
Surn af Critical VfS Ftatios33°'~
Intersection VlC Ratio: 36°'~
Intersection Delay: 4,1
Intersectivn LOS; A
Synchro 2.0 Report DA96[}48'+A50,SY4
tnland Pacific En_W-neering. L['EC Page 2
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN i, 1000
Timfngs Summary
1
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
' OfFset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
119 H ~h l ffl
EBL EBT WBL WBT VBL NBT BL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s.) 18 14 20 16 22 41 15 34
Current Split 20q6 16% 22q6 18q6 24% 46g6 17% 38g6
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yeliow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLNAN
1 't 1144 3
,frj- 5 6 8 i L 7
1
Volume Worksheet
'
0 l ~H 29 Ini I I rq 41 41 ~j I
EBL EBT EBR WBL INBT W R NBL NBT N13R SSL SBT SBR
' Volume (vph. ) 207 264 66 189 344 175 104 820 212 168 344 217
Peak Hour Factor 0_93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 284 71 203 370 188 112 882 228 181 370 233
Lane Group F(ow 223 390 0 203 614 0 112 1165 0 181 388 233
1
1
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481A50.SY4
lnland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
' SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN ~ta~~ 3 1. 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1 , .
~ H 'L *1 . -q ro. 41
1-t ' -I ;I
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flrn+v (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 096 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles (°/6) 4% 4°i6 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°i6 4% 4% 4°i6 4% 4%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/Fir. )
Frt Protected 0 973 0.954 0.971 0.850
' Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot.) 1736 5333 1736 5229 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm. 0.973 0.954 0.971 0.854
Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (peRn. ) 1736 5333 1736 5229 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Capacity and Levei of Service Anatysis Summary
.
~Y- Ir H I f L4 ~ . 41
~
Lane GrouQ EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Fiow (vph. ) 223 390 203 614 112 1165 181 388 233
Prot. Satd. Fiow 1736 5333 1736 5229 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Penn. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.17 0.12 0.19 0.14 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.51
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 289 652 328 755 366 1498 231 1259 794
V/C Ratio 0.77 0.60 0.62 0.81 0.31 0.78 0.78 0.31 0.29
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 27.2 28.4 25.5 28.3 22.7 17.0 28.7 16.4 8.4
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 8.1 1.1 2.5 4.7 0.2 1.9 10.7 0.0 0.1
' Delay 35.4 29.5 28.2 31.3 22.9 18.9 39.3 16.5 8.5
LOS D D D D C C D C B
Cycie Length: 90
' Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 68°r6
Intersection V/C Ratio: 78°r6
' Interseciion Delay: 24.0
Intersection LOS. C
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481A50. SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN klay "11. 1996
- - - - ,
fiimings Sumrnary
Cycle Length: 90
h1atural Cyc1e: 150
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-WB7, Begin Of +Creen
PYI H 4_1 H ~I Fq Li
I EBL EBT YYBL 1VI187 NBL NEiT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prvt F'""'rot F'rot Prot
Phase IVumber 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Y'es Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or L.ag?
Currerri Split (s.) 26 24 23 21 14 23 20 29
Current Split 29% 27% 26% 23% 16% 26% 22% 32%
~ Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
'Y'ellow fiime (s.) 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost l'ime (s.) 3.0 10 30 3.0 30 3,0 3.0 3.0
Spli'ts anci Phases: SPR►4GUE AVE & SlJLL#11AN
2 4 3
~ 2D ~3 23 44P I 114 1 2~ ~
Ld 5 ~ltj 8 T
Volume "UVK'orksMeet
~ ~
~ ~ 131 Lfi- ~ LS hi m ~ A L~j ~
EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT #IVBR iVL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
~ 1}olume (vph. ) 380 643 231 292 543 237 9 72 447 175 283 805 385
Peak Hour Factor O.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 O.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0,93 O.93 O.93
Lane l.lti1. Factor 1.04 1.14 1.10 1 .QO 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00
~ Ad}, F3ow (vph, ) 409 691 248 314 584 255 185 481 188 304 866 414
Lane GrQUp Flow 409 1034 0 314 922 0 185 703 304 909 414
~
~
' Synchra 2.0 Repork I]a_W6(7481FW5Y4
7nland Pacific ~ngineerine.. TPF..C Page l
1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
~yl OD000003 C3 Fil El
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR 6l SBT M
' -
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl. ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
' Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade (°,6) 0°6 0°i6 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0.964 0.958 0.960 0.850
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5440 1787 5407 1767 3612 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0.964 0.958 0.960 0.850
' Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Fiow (perm. ) 1787 5440 1787 5407 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
1
Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summary
a a LO 0 El Ft-I 0 FI-I 21
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Fiow (vph.) 409 1034 314 922 185 703 304 909 414
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5440 1787 5407 1787 3612 1787 3762 1599
Pemn. Satd. Flow 1559
Green Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.12 0.22 0.19 0.29 0.5-1
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 457 1269 397 1081 218 803 338 1087 871
V/C Retio 0_90 0_81 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.90, C) 84 4 t-
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 24.6 24.8 25.1 26.4 29.4 25.7 27 1 2 1 2' 8 8~
Prog. Facior 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0{.
Incr. Delay, d2 14.0 3.0 7.1 4.8 17.3 7.6 18.2 4.1 0`
~ Delay 38.6 27.8 36.6 32.5 46.7 33.3 45.3 26.9 8;_
~ . _
-
Vy~-~C l_~;i', gili
' Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios
Intersection V/C Ratio- 881D~~
' Intersection Delay- 30 r
Intersection LOS- D
Syachro 2.4 Report D:\960481P50.SY4
Inland Pacific Enginecring, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN tiiay 31,1990
Timings Summary
'
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 80
' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
a E 3 ❑ I B
EBT 1NBT NBT §BT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 74 74 16 16
Current Split 82% 82°r6 18°,G 180/c
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s ) 30 30 30 3.0
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8► CONKLIN
It] 2 ~ 4
16 74
Volume Worksheet
Fril oo0
EBL EBT EBR WOL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 24 1394 14 41 1007 14 70 5 58 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 26 1499 15 44 1083 15 75 5 62 13 0 15
Lane Group Flow 0 1617 0 0 1199 0 0 142 0 0 28 0
'
~
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481P50. S)'-~
Inland Pacific Engincering, iPEC Page .
, -
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN N tay 3 1, 199t1
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
aE3 Ffl LO El 21 EiloaoL-io Ei
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL M SBR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 196 1% 1 g6 196 196 1% 1% 1% 196 1% 1% 1%
Bus Stops (#lhr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#lhr. )
Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828
Fit Protected 0,999 0.998 0.974 0.977
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 3755 3747 1541 1522
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828
' F It Perm. 0.779 0.660 0.916 0.903
Satd. Flow (perm. ) 2928 2478 1449 1407
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
E~ El [:J [D
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 1617 1199 142 28
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 2928 2478 1449 1407
Green Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.14 0.14
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2310 1955 209 203
V/C Ratio 0.70 0.61 0.68 C' ~4
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 3.4 3.0 27.7 "2-5
Prog. Factor 1.52 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 0.7 0.4 5.8 0.0
' Detay 5.9 3.4 33.5 25.5
LOS B A D D
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 65%
Intersection V1C Ratio: 70%
Intersection Delay: 6.4
Intersection LOS- B
Synchro 2 0 Report D:\96048\P50.SY=3
Inland Pacific Engineerine. IPFC Pave 4
1
2001
, LEVELS UF SERVICE
WITH FRUJECT
1
'
1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN ~Iav 31, 199c,
Timings Summary
,
Cycle Length: 90
Naturai Cycle: 150
' Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
~ a [B El Ftl F A Fil,
EBL E6T WBL 11VBT IBL 1BT ,~,L BT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Splii (s. ) 17 14 20 17 22 41 15 34
Current Split 19°y6 16% 22% 19% 24% 46°k 17°,6 38%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 35
Lost Time (s ) 30 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 3,0 30
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
1 f- 2 4 3
7 7 )5 1
20 14 22 34
~ 5 6 E1 8 117
Volume Worksheet
oooaooooo000
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT N6R SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph. ) 207 283 66 204 355 180 104 820 238 176 344 217
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.OC
' Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 304 71 219 382 194 112 882 256 189 370 233
Lane Group F1ow 2123 413 Q 219 631, C 112 1195 0 189 388 23 3
1
'
'
S}rnchro 2.0 Report D:\964481.A5W.SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN N1ay 31, 1990
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
~F-AooooaaoooF]
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N L NBT NBR SBL SBT BR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideai Flow (vphpl. ) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grede 096 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 4% 4% 4% 496 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#Ihr. )
Frt Protected 0.974 0.954 0.968 0.850
F It Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm. 0.974 0.954 0.968 0 850
F It Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,950
Satd. Flow (perm j 1 i 36 5338 1 i 36 5229 1736 3537 1 i 36 3654 1553
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
LEIODODDOD~'
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT S~B SB,T 5Bf=
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Bo~
Adj. Flow (vph.) 223 413 219 633 112 1195 189 388 233
Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5338 1736 5229 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.50
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 270 652 328 813 366 1493 231 1259 776
V/C Ratio 0.83 0.63 0.67 0.78 0.31 0.80 0.82 0.31 0.30
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 28.6 25.7 27.7 22.7 17.2 28.6 16.4 8.8
Prog. Facior 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 12.7 1.4 3.5 3.4 0.2 2.3 13.5 0.0 0.1
Defay 40.6 30.0 29.3 30.4 22.9 19.5 42.3 16.5 8.9
LOS E D D D C C E C 8
Cycle Length: 9C
' Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V; ~
Intersection V/C Ratio: 80%
, Intersection Delay: 24.8
Intersection LOS. C
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\960481A5W.SY4
Inland Pacific Fnizineerine. IPF(' Paee 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Mav 31, 1990
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 80
~ Offset: 0 (0%). Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
aeoo
EBT WBT N6T BT
Left Tum Type Penn Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag^
Current Split (s. ) 70 ; u^ 2G 20
Current Split (°r6) 78°y6 78% 22°r6 22%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 30
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
IT 2 4
~o
Volume Worksheet
L=.j EA Ffl Lil El rq El U A L9 L-:J Ft~j
EBL EBT EOR WBL WBT VYBR NBL NBT NBR S~BL BT SBR
Volume (vph.) 5 667 3 13 633 14 82 3 37 13 2 1;
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.8~
Larte Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
adj. Flow (vph. ) 6 785 4 15 745 16 96 4 44 15 2 20
L:Iri P l';rn t.l [~t h- II, I r~ cl ! I 1; R15 i 1 \I i:-lc~ ! I
I ' _
'
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:196048XA5W. SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, iPEC Page I
'
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN tilav 3 1, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
~ FA ~ Lii El ~ El M La Lig LD El
EBL E8T EBR WOL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR BL ,BT BR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideai Flow (vphpi.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lene Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 096 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
HeavyVehicles(°i4,) 1°r6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1 % 1 % 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parkin9 (#lhr. )
Frt Proiected 0.999 0.997 0.859 0 827
Fit Protected 0.999 0.968 0.980
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 3759 3747 1564 1525
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.859 0.827
~ Fft Perm. 0.927 0.873 0.675 0.874
Satd. Flow (perm. ) 3484 3275 1414 1360
'
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
a RZI Ffl D
Lane Groua EBT WBT IBT, SBT
Perm, or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 834 815 144 37
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3484 3275 1414 1360
Green Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 2594 2438 267 257
V/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.54 0 14
Critical LG? Yes Yec
Uniform Delay, d1 2.9 3.0 25.0 j 2 3 1
Prog. Factor 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0
' De{ay 2.2 3.0 26.7 23.1
LOS A A D C
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Criticai V/S Ratios: 35%
Intersection V!C Ratio: 38%
' Irrtersection Delay: 4.9
Intersection LOS A
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481A5W.SY4
.inecring, IPEC Pa$e 2
lnland Pacific Env
1 -
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1996
Timinga Summary
1
Cycie Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
1
2t] E~ Cil E3 El Ftl Fq F41
EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Curtent Split (s. ) 25 23 23 21 14 24 20 30
Curtent Spiit 28% 26% 26% 23% 16% 27% 22°r6 33%
' Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
S lita and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 SULLIVAN
1 2 4 3
25 21 20 4
23 3 14 30
A 5 6 Ih S ~ 7
'
Volume Worksheet
1 0 0 0 D 0 rq 0 0 D 0 El
EBL E6T FBR 1,L1lBL WBT WBR IBL, NBT NBR BL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 380 673 231 335 573 250 172 447 218 296 805 38`-
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0_93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.9:_-
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.0(
' Adj. Flow (vph. ) 409 724 248 360 616 269 185 481 234 318 866 41=:
F14n(; 4 ^(~r1 ^'!1
'
'
1
'
Synchro 2.0 Repon D:\96048\P5W.SY~
Inland Pacific En.aineerine, IPEC PaQe 1
1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN k1ay 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
~fl E~ a] [a El L9 El [D Ld ER 1-4-1 El
" E6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR BL SST OR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
' Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0°i(o 0°r6 0% 0%
Area Type 4ther Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1°r6 1°r6 1% 1 q6 1% 1°r6 1% 1 gb 1% 1°r6 1°r6 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#lhr. )
Frt Protected 0.965 0.959 0.953 0.850
Flt Protec#ed 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot.) 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Frt Perm. 0.965 0.959 0.953 0.850
Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm. ) 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
'
Gapacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
0 F-4 51- El 0 Ffl Fq 0 El
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph.) 409 1069 360 974 185 751 318 909 414
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3586 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.12 0.23 0.19 0.30 0.54
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 437 1210 397 1082 218 837 338 1129 871
V/C Ratio 0.94 0.88 0.91 0.90 0.85 0.90 0.94 0 81 048
Criticai LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 25.3 25.7 25.9 26.7 29.4 25.4 27.4 22 1 8 3
Prag, Factar 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
incr. Delay, d2 20.0 5.7 17.0 7.4 17.3 8.9 24.8 3.1 0.3
Delay 45.3 31.4 46.9 353 46.7 34.3 52.1 25.2 8.5
' LOS E D E D E D E C B
Cycie Length. 90
' Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios 80%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 92%
' Intersection Delay~ 33 5
Intersection LOS- D
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481P5W_SY4
lnland Pacific Engineering, TPEC Page 2
1
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN N1ay 31s 1996
Timings Summary
'
Cycle Length. 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset- 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
1
EA E 3 f fl M
' EBT WBT NBT BT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 75 75 15 15
Current Split 83% 83% 17% 17%
Minimum Spiit (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 30 30 30
' Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
I 2 4
' 15 75
Volume Worksheet
'
DF-Aooeaooooa[W]
EBL, EBT EBR WBL, WBT VI,~R NBL NBT, NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Volume (vph. ) 24 1479 14 41 1092 14 70 5 58 12 0 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0_93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1_05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph.) 26 1590 15 44 1174 15 75 5 62 13 0 15
' Lane Group Flow 0 1713 0 0 1295 0 0 142 0 0 28 C
1
1
1
Synchro 2.0 Report D:\964481P5W,SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 3
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Workaheet
'
Pq Eioooooooooa
E8L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S6T SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 C
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 00/0 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1 g6 196 1°r6 1% 1% 1 qG 1% 1% 1 q6 1 % 1% 10/0
Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0,841 0. 8 28
, Flt Protected 0.999 0.996 0.974 0.97;
Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1541 1522
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.841 0.828
Fit Pemi. 0.769 0.662 0.914 0.870
Satd. Flow (perm.) 2890 2486 1446 1355
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
f~D00
Lane Groua EBT WBT NBT BT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
, Adj. Flow (vph.) 1713 1295 142 28
Prot. Satd. Fiow
Perm. Satd. Flow 2890 2486 1446 1355
Green Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.13 0.13
, Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 2312 1989 193 181
V/C Rstio 0.74 0.65 0.74 1
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 3.4 2.8 28.5 :_6
Prog. Factor 1.57 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 0.9 0.5 9.2 0.0
Delay 6.2 3.4 37.6 26.2
' LOS B A D D
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 69%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 74%
, Intersection Delay: 6.6
Intersection LOS- 6
' Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481P5W.SY4
lnland Pacific Engineenng, IPEC Page 4
'
2006
' LEVELS OF SERVICE
VVITHOUT PROJECT
~
'
1
~
I
1
1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN 31, 19,lo
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Refererced to phase ?-WBT. Bagin Qf Green
oaCilF] El L D Fq F4
E~B EBT WB,L WBT NBL NBT S8L SBT
Left Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 fi 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 18 14 20 16 22 41 15 34
Current Split 20% 16% 22% 18% 24% 46% 17% 38~~/G
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 35
Lost Time (s. ) 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 30 30 3.0
S lita and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
-t 1 2 4 t 3
16 6 5 1
20 14 22 34
,C7 ~ F1 !7~
VUiUtlic3 Viluf►t6tiBE:i
DOOOD~Dm000~-_
EBL E,~B EBR WBL 11~T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
, Volume (vph. ) 234 298 74 213 387 188 117 925 238 183 385 24►=
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.9._
Lane Utll, Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.OC
' Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 320 80 229 416 202 126 995 256 197 414 26`
c „ ~ ^ 7 . , r
~
'
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D~196048\A100.SY4
Inland Pacific Enaineering. TPF.C Page 1
SF'RAGUE AVE & S4.JLL111A►N jt, 1996
Lane ancf Saturated Flow Worksheet
~
zi a Eii El En Lil El [ij Li~ E91
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 Z 0 1 2 1
fdeai Flow (vphpl. ) 19M 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1903 1900 1900 19010
SYaared Lane? Na Yes CVa Yes No Yes Nv No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
GCad~ 0% 0% 0% 0°la
Are,a Ty~e Other Other Other Other
Hea'vy Vehicfe5 4% 4% 4~"'0 4% 4°'►►6 4% 4°'o 4% 4% 4% 4°'v 4`''~
~ Bus Stops (#Ihr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#lhr. )
Frt Pratected 0.973 (}.955 0.971 0.850
Flt F'roteeted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow {prot, } 1736 5333 1736 5234 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Frt P'erm. 0.973 0.955 0.971 0-850
Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd, Flow (perm. ) 1 736 5333 1 736 5234 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
~ .
Capactty and Level of ~ervice Arralysis Summary
~fl E3 [B El kJ ~ ril El
Lane Grou EBL EBfi INBL WBT MBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or F"rQt.? PrvR ~rot Trvt ~rot P"rvt Pr~t -P cot 1~~~t 13oth
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 252 440 229 680 126 1313 197 435 265
Prot. Satd. F1ow 1736 5333 4 736 5234 1736 3548 1736 3654 1553
Rerm. Satd. Flow 1553
C reen Ratio 0.17 0.12 0_ 19 0,14 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.51
~ Lar~~ Grp. Cap, (vph. ) 289 552 328 756 366 1 498 1259 794
1J1C Ratio 0.87 0.68 (7.7(3 0.90 0.34 0.88 0.85 0.35 0.33
Critical LG? Yes Y~s Yes Yes
4Jnaform Delay, d1 27.8 28.7 25.9 28.7 22.9 18.1 28.9 16.7 8.6
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.D3 0.96 1M 1.00 IM 1M 1.00
lncr. Dekay; d2 16.5 1.9 4.4 3.8 0.2 4.4 17,0 0.1 0.1
L`3elay 44_2 301 30.9 37.4 23.2 22.6 46.0 16.7 8.7
LOS E D Q 0 c c E C B
Cycle Length: 90
Lc+st Tirne: 12
Sum vf Critical Vf i Ratlos: 764~'~a
fntersecfion VlC Rafio: 88%
~ Inte~section Delay: 27.5
Intersection LOS, D
Synchro 2.0 Repvrt I]:\96048'A100. SY4
Inla~d Pacific Engineering, [PEC P~ge 2
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Ntay 31, 1996
Tlmings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Naturai Cyc{e: 80
Offset: 0(0°k), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
1
E~ FA In ID
EBT WBT JBT BT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging'?
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 70 70 20 20
Current Spiit 78% 78q6 2296 22%
Minimum Sptit (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s. ) 30 3.0 3.0 30
Sp{its and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
y 2
20 70
VUlUt7iE: WUCICStii;E'.~
1+..~ 1J 1~ Lfi {~1 ~ JU u L.9 IJ ~
EBL EBT EBR WBL W8T WBR N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT BR
Volume (vph. ) 5 687 4 14 681 16 82 4 42 14 2 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0_85 0.85 0_85 0.85 0.85
Lane Util. Facior 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 6 808 5 16 801 19 96 5 49 16 2 2w*
Lane Group Flow 0 860 0 0 878 0 0 150 0 0 42 +
'
'
'
Synchro 2.0 RepoR D:\960481A 100. SY4
Inland Pacific F.nginm.ring. IPF(' PaP. e
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Mav 3 1, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
,
lylaoaeIN Elaoooo
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SFT, SQR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideai Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft, ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 096 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
' Bus Stops (#/hr ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr_ )
Frt Protected 0.999 0_997 0_856 0.823
Fit Protected 0.999 0.969 0.981
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 3759 3747 1560 1519
FrtPerm. 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.823
F!t Perm. 0,915 0.861 0.901 0.891
Satd. Flow (perm ) 3439 3230 1451 1379
~
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
E3 Fl 11 41
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Fiow (vph.) 860 878 150 42
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Fiow 3439 3230 1451 1379
Green Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 2560 2405 274 260
V1C Ratio 0.34 0.37 0.55 0.16
Criticai LG? Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 3.1 25.1 23.2
Prog. Factor 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incx. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0
Delay 2.1 3.1 26.9 23.2
LOS A A D C
Cycle Length: 90
Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 38%
Intefsection V/C Ratio: 40%
' Intersection Delay: 4 9
Intersection LOS- A
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481A 100. SY4
Inland Pacific Enqineering, IPLC Page
~ ,
SP~GUE ~'"~►~~E ~c SUL~.I'~a~AN ~1q4_3_l, C99b
Timings Sumrnery
Cycie Length; 90
Naturai Gycle: 150
- C3ffset: t} (0%), Refarencsd #c+ phase 2-►JU"BT, B+agin Of Green
~
EBL EBfi 1N8L WBT NBL NBT §131- SBT
Left Tum Type F"cot Prvt Prot Prot
Phase NumGer 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Laggirig? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ Can Lead or Lag?
Current SpIi# (s,) 27 24 23 20 14 23 20 29
L+L.Irrent Splil 3'0% 27% 26% LL% 1670 26% 22% 3L%
~ M1nkf11UY'f'1 SplIt {s. } 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
YE'Itow TImA (:3.) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.O 3.0 3n0 3.0
S lits and Phases; SPRAGUE AVE & SULf.IV'AN
-t, +-12 L4 4_ ~3
127- ~
14 ~9
JA 5 n a J~ 7
Volume worksneet
ej EA a] ril Ea DEl~~~ 11 El
EBL E3T EBR WBL W!~T "WQR NBL ~!~T NR SBL SgT SCiR
1~'c~lur~~e (vph.) ~43{~ ?2? 2~61 329 613 -~6-1 794 5~~ 797 TO~ ~07 435
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 43.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Utii. F~~or 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1 .05 1.00
A.d}. Fiow (vph.) 452 782 281 354 659 281 209 541 212 331 975 468
Lane Grvup Flvw 462 1 169 O 354 1034 0 209 790 0 331 1 024 468
~
Sym+chr+a 2.0 Repor~ DA96048\P100, $Y4
I11Ia I'~d P~iG1'~lC E11Q;11't@eRng. [PE[~ ~`~~Q,~ ~
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Md•; ; 1. 1~,O(_!
Lane and Saturated Fiow Worksheet
Da DD80D00f~DEl
EDL EDT EBF WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NOR 6L SBT BR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 i
Ideal Fiow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No Nc)
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12
Grade 0% 096 0% 0°r1-
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles (°r6) 1°i6 1% 1°r6 1% 1% 1% 1°r6 1% 1°r6 1°i6 10/1: t
Bus Stops (#/hr ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0.964 0 959 0.960 0 850
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 1787 5440 1787 5412 1787 3612 1787 3752 1599
Frt Perm. 0.964 0.959 0.960 0850
Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm. ) 1787 5440 1787 5412 1787 3612 1787 ti 762 159c-+
Capacity and Levei of Service Analysis Summar~~
~ B Cd El KI M
Lane Group EB F-BT WBL WBT NBL NBT BL SBT SBr--:
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Bor.
Adj. Flow (vph.) 462 1169 354 1034 209 790 331 1024 46
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5440 1787 5412 1787 3612 1787 3762 155
Perm. Satd. F1ow 15~•
Green Ratio 0_27 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.12 0.22 0.19 0.29 0.56
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 477 1269 397 1022 218 803 338 1087 886
V/C Ratio 0.97 0.92 0.89 1.01 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.53
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 24.8 25.6 25.8 27.8 29.8 26.5 27.6 23.8 8.2
Prog. Fac#or 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
incr. Delay, d2 24.8 8.0 15.1 24.4 35.7 21.0 32.8 11.3 0-
Delay 49.6 33.6 44.8 53.4 65.5 47.4 60.4 35.0 8
LOS E D E E F E E D E
Cycle Len9th: 9C
Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical Vi5 Rdtius. o:-,
Intersection V/C Ratio 9R°1~
' Intersection Delay- 4'
InfierSertion LQS- F
'
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481P 100. SY 4
Tnland Pacific FniineerinL, iPE(' PaLe ~
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN N1ay 31,1996
Timings Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 60
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
~ E I D Fil
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number Q 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Can Lead or Lag ?
Cunent Split (s. ) 76 7 6 14 14
Current Split 84% 84% 16% 16%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s ; 30 3~j 30
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE 8 CONKLIN
2 4
14 6
I
vOlUii1G vuiidksfi~~;l
lj.j Lij F*.- L .y ~ tJ 1~ A Lii L
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL N~ NBR BL SBT §BR
Volume (vph. ) 28 1561 16 47 1140 16 71 5 65 14 0 1(-
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.9~
Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OC,
Adj. Flow (vph.) 30 1678 17 51 1226 17 76 5 70 15 0 1 ~
'
~
'
Synchro 2,0 Report D:\960481P100.SY4
lnland Pacific Enuineering, IPEC Page 3
'
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN May 31, 1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
1
oF-A El L9 Rfl LOoooo
EBL E8T EBR WBL WBT WBR N8L NB NBR BL BT BR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 U
Ideai Fiow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0°!0
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicies 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°rb 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°k 1°k
Bus Stops (#mr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Protected 0.999 0_998 0.837 0.828
Flt Protected 0.999 0.998 0.975 0.977
Satd. Fiow (prot. ) 3755 3747 1535 1522
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.837 0.828
' Fit Perm. 0.735 0.639 0.968 0.863
Satd. Flow (perm.) 2763 2399 1524 1344
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
0 Fl Fti ED
Lane Groua EBT WUT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Pemn Perm
Adj. Flow (vph.) 1812 1358 151 32
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 2763 2399 1524 1344
Green Ratio 0.81 0.81 0.12 0.12
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2241 1946 186 164
V/C Ratio 0.81 0.70 0.81 1 c+
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Unifornn Delay, d1 3.5 2.8 29.2 i:
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
incr. Delay, d2 1.6 0.8 15.4 0.1
' Delay 5.2 3.6 44.6 27.1
l_OS A A E G
Cycie Length 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V1S Ratios 75
Intersection V1C Ratio• 81
' tntersection Delay: 6 5
Intersection LOS- B
Synchro 2.0 Report D:196048\P 100. SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
r
2006
~ L~~~~~
~ ~~OJIECT
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
■
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN May 31, 1990
Timinga Summary
1
Cycle Length. 90
Natura) Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-WBT, Begin Of Green
'
~D ooooooa
' EBL EBT WBL INB~T NBL NBT BL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 18 14 20 16 22 41 15 34
Current Spiit 20% 16% 22°/6 18% 24% 46% 17°r6 38%
Minimum Sp(it (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Time (s.) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.0
S lits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
P z 4
' 8 6 15 41
20 14 22 34
Volume UVorkshee:
1 - - - - ` _ - - - - - ~ ~
F:ij Ib-30 Df- ~ LIJ D*,L D L-.r~ L~lJ lJ l~
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Volume (vph. ) 234 317 74 228 398 193 117 925 264 191 385 24e
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.9-i
Lane Uti1. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.OC
Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 341 80 245 428 208 126 995 284 205 414 26~-
' 1._ nnr, t, 7rcI_)r FII"}';Aj n ''Q ~ ~nQ In, 47 n ?n"l l11cf o` r.
'
1
,
Synchro 2.0 Report D.\960481A10W.SY4
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
'
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN %1av 31,1996
Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
'
2i aooeoooDOOa
EBL EBT FBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT N,6F §11L ,T MR
' Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
' Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grede (96) 0°r6 0°r6 0% 00/0
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles (°y6) 4°!0 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4°r6 4°/6 4°y6 4%
t Bus Stops (#/hr 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#/hr. )
Frt Proiected v~~ 4 0.955 0968 0850
' Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Frt Perm. 0.974 0.955 0.968 0.850
' Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm } 1736 5338 1736 523~ 173f_-) 353.7 1; 3-3 3654 155~
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
2t] o[B FAaooao
1
Lane Groua EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT BL SBT S8R
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Proi Prot Prot Both
' Adj. Flow (vph.) 252 463 245 699 126 1342 205 435 265
Prot. Satd. Flow 1736 5338 1736 5234 1736 3537 1736 3654 1553
Perm. Satd. Flow 1553
Green Ratio 0.17 0.12 0.19 0.14 0.21 0.42 0.13 0.34 0.51
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 289 652 328 756 366 1493 231 1259 794
V!C Ratio 0.87 0.71 0.75 0.92 0.34 0.90 0.89 0.35 0 33
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
' Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 28.9 26.2 28.9 22.9 18.4 291 16.7 8.6
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0_96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 16.5 2.5 6.2 12.3 0.2 5.5 21.5 0.1 0.1
Delay 44.2 31.3 33.0 40.0 23.2 23.9 50.6 16.7 8 7
, Los E D D D c c E c a
Cycle Length. 90
, Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 78%
Intersection V/C Ratio- 90%
' Intersection Oeley- 28 9
Intersection LOS- D
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481A1OW.SY4
Inland Pacific Engineerin¢, IPEC Page 2
SPRAGUE A1~~ ~ CONKLIN mav 11, 1 99b.
Tirnings aumrrary
~ .
Cycle Length; 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset: 0 (0°'~), Referenced tcr phase 2-AIB-SB, Begin Of Green
E3 El In a]
EBT WBT NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase La+gging?
~ Can Lead vr Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 70 7(] 20 20
CulrTent Split (p/a) 78% 7$% 22°eb 22°Jn
Nlinirnum Spl it (s. ) 10 10 10 10
YeI Iow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Lost Tirne (s.) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
S iits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
~
4
70
~ -
Votumre 1Norksheet
~ Eq 51 Lil F-1 L~J El Ftl La 13 M ~
fBL EBT EBR WBL WBfi W~R NSL NBT NBR S8L BT BR
~ U'olume (vph.) 5 740 4 14 712 16 82 4 42 14 2 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 O,85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Lane Util. Factvr 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1,05 1.05 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
~ Adj. Florlv (vph.) f 871 5 16 838 19 96 : 49 16 2 24
Lane Group Fidw ~ 0 0 917 D ~ ~ 0 0 42 Q
~
~
~
.
~ Synchro 2.0 R.eport D:19604WA10"W.SY4
Inla[Id PaC1fiC EngIneei`fl1g. IPEC Page 3
,
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN 1. 1900
,
Lane and Saturarted Flaw Worksheet
' . . . . .
1-t I 1 r. y f~
EBL EBT EBB WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
' Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1940 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles (°yb) 1% 1% 1% 1% 196 1% 1% 1°k 1% 1 q6 1% 1%
' Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#lhr. )
Frt Protected 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.823
Flt Protected 0.999 0.969 0.981
Satd. Flow (prot. ) 3759 3747 1560 1519
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.997 0.856 0.823
Fit Perm. 0.912 0.843 0.901 0.891
Satd, Flow (perm. ) 3428 3162 1451 1379
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
Lane QrouQ EBT WBT NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
, Adj. Flow (vph. ) 925 917 150 42
Prot. Satd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Flow 3428 3162 1451 1379
Green Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 2552 2354 274 260
V/C Ratio 0.36 0.39 0.55 0.16
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 3.1 25.1 23.2
Prog. Factor 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 1.8 0.0
' Delay 2.2 3.2 26.9 23.2
LOS A A D C
Cycle Length: 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V!S Ratios: 39°k
Intersection V/C Ratio: 42%
' Intersection Delay: 4 9
Intersection LOS: A
Synclu-o ?.U Kepotl ,90,•4B.A l ii«" SY•-l
Inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 4
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
Timings Summary
,
Cycle Length. 100
Naturat Cycle: 150
Offset: 0(0°r6). Referencea to phase 2-WBT Begin Of GreEn
'
12] El LO e El lfl Lig F4-1
EBL E8T WBL W8T NBL N T BL SBT
Left Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 6 5 2 8 3 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 29 26 26 23 16 26 22 32
Current Split 29% 26% 26% 23% 16% 26% 22% 32%
Minimum Split (s.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
LostTime(s) 30 3.0 30 30 30 30 30 30
Sptita and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN
1 2 4 3
29 3 22 26
26 26 16 32
~ 5 s a J► 7
Volume Worksheet
ooaoo~ooo~oo
EBL E6T FBR I1L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SOT S8R
Volume (vph.) 430 757 261 372 643 274 194 503 240 321 907 435
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00
' Adj. Flow (vph. ) 462 814 281 400 691 295 209 541 258 345 975 468
Lane Group F1ow 462 1204 0 400 1085 0 209 839 0 345 1024 468
'
1
'
,
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481P10W.SY4
inland Pacific Engineering, IPEC Page 1
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN RD
2006 w/ project rMl ~ PEAV-. EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph) 462 1204, 400 1085 209 839 345 1024 468
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.26 i 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.13 0.23 0.19' 0.29 0.55
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph) 465 1253 411 1082 232 825 340 1091 879
V/C Ratio 0.99 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.90 1.02, 1.02 0.94 0.53
Criticai LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 28.1 28.9 29 30.4 32.6 29.4 30.9 26.3 9.5
Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incr. Delay, d2 30.7 12.6 27.8 21.6 23.5 28.2 42.1 10.8 0.5
Delay 58.8 41.5 61.4 53.5 56_ 1 57.6 73_ 0 37_ 1 10.0
LOS E E F E E E F D B
i . . . _ .
Cycle Length: 100
Lost Time: 12 ~
Sum of Critical VIS Ratios: 89%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 101 %
Intersection Delay: i 49.1
Intersection LOS: E j ~
~ I I I I
Progression factors calculated using lowest values for other PM scenarios.
I
1 ,
SPRAGUE AVE & SULLIVAN Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet
OEq Lil Lii I~ El Fti La Fq DFBL M EOR, W6L WBT WBR 1BL IBT NBR OL 8T SBR
Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? No Yes No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Width (ft. ) 12 12 12 12
Grede 0°yb 0;6 0% 00/0
Area Type Other Other Other Other
Heavy Vehicles 1 q6 1% 1% 1 % 1% 1% 1% 1 g6 196 196 1°r6 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr. ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#Ihr. )
Frt Protected 0.965 0.959 0 954 0 850
Flt Protecied 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd, Flow (prot. ) 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3589 1787 3762 159G
Frt Perm. 0.965 0.959 0.954 0 850
Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd Flow (perm. ) 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Capacity and Levet of Service Analysis Summary
FflODOOD00~9'
Lane Groua EB._L, OT V16L 11~T NSL N,BT §QL -SBT ~6R.
Perm. or Prot.? Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Prot Both
Adj. Flow (vph. ) 462 1204 400 1085 209 839 345 1024 468
Prot. Satd. Flow 1787 5446 1787 5412 1787 3589 1787 3762 1599
Perm. Satd. Flow 1599
Green Ratio 0.26 0.23 4.23 0.20 4.13 0.23 0.19 0.29 0.55
' Lane Grp. Cap. (vph. ) 465 1253 411 1082 232 825 340 1091 879
V/C Ratio 0.99 0_96 0_97 1.00 0.90 1_02 1.02 0 94 0 53
Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 28.1 28.9 29.0 30.4 32.6 29.4 309 26 3 9 5
Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Incr. Delay, d2 30.7 12.6 27.8 21.6 23.5 28.2 42.1 10.8 0,5
' Delay 54.6 37.1 52.5 47.4 51.2 53.2 68.3 33.2 8.6
LOS E D E E E E F D B
Cycle Length: 100
Lost Time: 12
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 89%
Intersection V/C Ratio: 101 %
' Intersection Delay: 43 0
Intersection LOS. E
Synchro 2.0 Report D:196048\P 1 0W. SY-1
Inland Pacific Engineering, iPEC Page '
, ~
SPRAC~UE AVE & CONKLIN titay 3 i, 1990
Timin$s Summary
'
Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 80
Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
EBT W8T NBT SBT
Left Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
' Can Lead or Lag?
Current Split (s. ) 177 i 7 13 1 ~
Current Split (9+6) 86% 86% 14% 14°k
Minimum Split (s. ) 10 10 10 10
Yellow Time (s. ) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
LCS! T;m e j 5 1 31-1 3 0 ? 0 30
Splits and Phases: SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN
412 4
13 la
Volunie Workstieet
LfJ H
EBL EBT EISR WBL 1NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph.) 28 1646 16 47 1225 16 71 5 65 14 0 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
' Adj. Flow (vph. ) 30 1770 17 51 1317 17 76 5 70 15 0 17
l..ane Groun Flow 0 1908 0 0 1454 0 0 151 C? 0 3?
'
'
'
S~u~iiio Lo hepo;[
inland Pacific Engineerine. [PEC Page
1 ,
SPRAGUE AVE & CONKLIN Lane and Satuirated Fiow Worksheet
DEqDDf- 0I-q I~m F&I lig 1-41 El
-C~B EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL N13T NBR BL S,OT BR
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Idea1 Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1904 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Shared Lane? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 12
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area Type Other Qther Other Other
HeavyVehicles(°~) 1% 1% 1°y6 1% 1% 1°r6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1°!0 1%
Bus Stops (#/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking (#fir. )
Frt Protected 0.999 0.998 0 837 0.828
Fit Protected 0.999 0.998 0.975 0.97 i
Satd. Flow (prot.) 3755 3747 1535 1522
Frt Perm. 0.999 0.998 0.837 0.828
Flt Perm. 0.729 0.644 0.983 0.826
Satd. F1ow (perm. ) 2740 2418 1548 1287
Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary
a Ea Ffl [D
Lane Groua EBT W6T NBT SBT
Perm. or Prot.? Perm Perm Perm Perm
Adj. Flow (vph.) 1908 1454 151 32
Prot_ Setd. Flow
Perm. Satd. Fiow 2740 2418 1548 1287
Green Ratio 0.82 0.82 0.11 0.11
Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 2253 1988 172 143
V/C Ratio 0.85 0.73 0.88 0.22
Critical LG? Yes Yes
Uniform Delay, d1 3.6 2.7 29.9 27.7
Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Incr. Delay, d2 2.3 1.0 25.2 0.1
Delay 5.3 3.3 50.6 23.7
LOS A A E C
CyGle Length: 90
' Lost Time: 6
Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 79°!0
Intersection V/C Ratio: 85°r6
' Intersection Delay: 6.6
Intersection LOS B
Synchro 2.0 Report D:1960481P10W.SY4
Inland PACific Engineering. TPEC Page 4