The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-030-95 • ~ . NO. 95-1145 ~ J BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ - IN THE MATTER OF CONCERNING ZONE ) J RECLASSIFiCAT10N ZE-030-95 URBAN ) NOTICE OF RESIDENTIAL-7 TO REGIONAL BUSINESS ) PUBUC HEARING APPUCANT: PAMELA S. AYERS ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Applic,ant, Pamela S. Ayers, has filed Notice of Appeai of the denial t'ry the Hearing Examiner Committee of above captioned application for zone ~ reclassification; and ; • ~ - I`'--o.<i; NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of Counry Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will Conduct a public hearing , TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995, AT 5:00 P.M. (or as soon as possible thereafter) , y/~ . ~-.i( " r V COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM SPOKANE COUNTY PUBUC WORKS BUILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 kv;~. to consider this proposed zone reclassification trom Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (8-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the - Regional Business zone on property J Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Dishman-Mica Road and Hatherty Circle in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposal. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbalty or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessa-., The Board's meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities which are accessible disabled individuals. For more particular information with respect to the accessibility ot the Public Works Building, Commissioners' Assembly Room, please contact Rosanne Montague, Clerk of the Board, at (509) 456-2265. • RECEIVED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 10 day of October, 1995. SPOKANE COUNTY WILLIAM E. DONAHUE 0 C T 2 3 1995 CLERK OF THE BOARD DNI810N OF eu+L01NC3 ANO PLANMIN(3 eY 4R~42EEVONTAGUE, DEP 0 CT 1 1 4,90v DI TRl TI N• T: OEPT. .L STATE EXAM`~ PUBLiSH 10/1g~rAPPfJ11. FlLE/HEATHGR' ZEa3pNnT 1010 :e~ • r ~ - REOEVED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSlQNERS SEP 2 9 1995 C4U;~"t'y MMM1Q-SI0NERS APPEAL FEE - J$215 NAME: ~ A4-A -c-&S TODAY'S DATE C ADDR ESS: E. I ~Sj~) QTAy m11 ff tcr~. IP CODE HOME PHONE: ~rl(4 ' ~W-7 BUSINESS PHONE: -C~lw 7 HEARiNG EXAMiNER ACT10N BEING APPEALED PRELIi1111NARY SUBDfVIS{ON NAME PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NUMBER ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ~ E~~J DATE OF HEARING INER COMMITTEE ACTiON R€CEIVED SF'4KANE COUNTY ~ SIGNATURE OF APPELLANT ~ SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 0 T 2 3 1995 01vfSiON oF eUILDING AND PLqNN1N ADDRESS YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL ' ~ r < < 0- Q _ ~ ~.s~ r~. 1„ v~. ~ L o ve eJ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Copies to: Planning Engineers Environmental Health Fee received: Check Cash Receipt Number Hearing Date WaQ 95 1145 ~v ~ .0 YL,9- ~r ~ ~ Y t,`, • f , ~t ~j~ • , • ~ A ' ~ - ~ mm ~ • - - _ ~ ti ' • _ • . ~ ~ . . • • . . . • • 30th Ave. ~~,~i;..~ ~ • x .,3o rH . . . . ~ . , : ~ , . . . . . . . . . , : ~ : . ~ o d ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 4. ' ' C1 (n • k._r r_•-r. ~ • • ~ 3 t st ~ ~ W Ave • . ~ 26.0.0.0 : ..'''~*:*~t'• . . . . • 31 ST ~ • ~ O • ~ ~ ~ • Ave. • . . ~ ~ ~ : ~ • 3 a. : ~ ~ 32nd . . -r . . ~ : . . . . . • . . . : . : . . . . . . . . . • . . . r•.•,•.• • . ti . . • • . ~ , • ; •~3 Rb~ /~VE . $ • 35 CZI-D 4v6• • . ..•r. ' • . ' • J v . .~.•r:.,! ~ • r • • g3~A . . • • ~ : • ~ • . . . "s~ . .s4TH r'i~vG' . . 00 d ~ ~1~1.~ • . I • . , ~ ~ •0 lb4T64 0 ' . r. . . • • s ~~.~~~~i~T~~ d 2 ~sTa+ Ave. ~ : ~I ~ Z • • • • ` - • ~ c ai ' J ' I~IULA ~ ~ St ' b~ , ~ ~ ~ > . ~ ~ • • I~L.dW& o : . Gt O s : • ~ ' ~ 3STN GT. , • ~ ± ~ 9 ~ ~ . " ~ 3~o'T~-1 ~ AVE ' r • ~ I~ . Q .•.-.~r • ~ r _ ~ . • ~ ~ ••t,~~ 3TTN ~ • 9V = • ~ : ~3 ~ . , , ~ • . _ • • ' i • Y~ I 1i+'~ ~i ~ n~T ~~01~ ~Cv • : ' a . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ z • - ~ , ~ . ~ • _ ~e s a : ~ • '~t • pT ~ , r v_/ ' ' ' ' } 3 . . ~ • R- Z0) 1 ' ' ' • • ` " :A_► ~ • : ~ . ~ ' • ~ ~ r ~~o ~ ~ ~ t ~ 42 c~ • • ' ? co ~ ~'i. • z Z ~ O , . ~ • ~ • t. ' ~ : ` r _ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • A V• ' i s , ( N • 43ed c~ 4 AM" z ' • r CNEST~Q ' > > ~ ?EMP 1 - , ~~~u~ N 61 , . c~ ' ~ • , o• • • . . ....~,r:-~ . .•.l. . • , _ - ~ ~ . . . . . ~.~~•L.~~~~• • • . ~ . . ~ ; THO PE r2 zm 1 + w 3 V I • V G 46TLl /SV E • , w Q t ~ ~ ~ a • 3 ~ ~ Z ' ,~"Z► ~ . ~ dl ~ 1, • arn+ ~ -A thQ~ ~,W,,, 4 ! ~ H qV ~ Iti ~ ~y ~Z : ` L ~ °r- s~9 z ..~P , ~ P ' • ~ ~ • . ~ Z = ^ ' ~ ~ 48 Tw ' P0 • ~ , 0; • . . . . ~ .A : -J i k►tk.T . ~ • J C A ~ ~ J ~ ~t y f - • ~ . /'1 ~ + . ~ 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 1TEM paee PAGE I pF f y ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . ZE=30=95 ~ ^ ~1i'~ ~ i • ~ ~ ~ d1 j~' ~ • _ . ~ ~ ' ~ • " ~ - - , ? . ~ h2 : ~ f L.~NCC. d~ . . ~ 30th ' Ave J : . ~ W : r . . . . • : Tp ~ ~ • o p. o ~31st ~ ~ ~ ti Ave ; . ~ •;.:•.•':j~:s•.•.-:~•:.•... : Q . . . . . • ~ 31 T . l ~ . • • d S 3 32nd Ave ~ ga ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . . . . , ,.1 . . . . ; ~ ; . ti•...,...,..•••.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.w :s p . 7 3 tir~ ' A.vE ~ I r~ /~va~• . L . .t 3 4 T 1-t .~r;. :.-.•..r.~rs.•.• •;~iSl~• r. d • . . w ~qYH • ~ . • ~ • . • 1- ~ 3 S T~t : A V G ~ ~ i ' • Z r i : ~ N ` . ~ • tj . J4 _ . . ; ~ , : J' Ca'cv► J• ' 1JU1,./~ QJ > t t7 ' •~/~LOLt/~ 0 ; 3 rr : • ••••'•ti~•... . GT ~ O ' . ~ • . ~ ~ 35TN CT ~ tA t . ~ G / 'l~~ 3CoTH ~ r 9VE ; ~ p o wn„ rA • UT~ : • ~B f. • ` ~ 2 3'7 T N 3 ~ • ~ o Av E ~ • ~ el. ~ ; . o N • ~ • 2.. ~ ' • a ' . `a ~ c~t~ 8 : +1: : ~O~ • ~ • • ' ~ vtO I . • •j~TO tl , ~ , - 40 TH • - " 3 . 8=3 1 W ` ~ I YI ~ (?~jfi~ 2 C ~ Z ~ i:• .5 0 f rz ~ I t: Q , ~ ~ `rl~ J r" ~ J pam3 ~t 1 -k r l \ ( - CNESTV2 J AV E N o ~ fi' c~osua.~ , r• o+' CEM ~ • • • • ~ ~ ~ • • • • • ~ • • ~ ~~1LL.L~ • • oii • ~~tij• ~ ~ U _ ~ yt? ~ i 'THo CE 2= ' i W 3 ~ 4(oTN AvE 0 o' : . _ •1 - ~ . . . . , W 0 : . a UR ~e5 .7 R ~ 1 • ~ + u J• J 01 cr- S' 47TN LLJ a 7 TN ~ _ i = / / . ' ~ ~ ' ~..c..,, cx ..~i~ •s.• s ~~y ~ 1 t~j ~ ~ ' a 48 741 ~ o , • ' > ¢B ry.~ ° 4 ' I ~ 21.A:. '•r~•.ti•:.~•~ J ~ERRE~ ~ / • , ' vtir~... - • ~ ~ r , J w Y~ < • ~ v : i ~ WR 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 I I Em ~ Rag~ PAGE ~ OF I `f ' a ~ {="40* ZE=30=95 I ed i i y ~ ' • ^ _jrem i Y ff_ ~ q ~Nn ~ ' I • - L a , • 1 • r % '~-~t - ~ o ` - , ~ - v ioi F~ _ _ - - . ~ - .~3_ 28 ' f . " . 4L 4 " _ 'y •j ' . ~v Wsit~e . - ~ , _ ~ ; -.s • MMyI~ jQI.1 . - _ ' ' i \ i~ ~ y 77 ! I J j`• I.. <y _ " ~ ~ ~ ♦ 8141 k • t ~ ~ s t s ' ' ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ +1 ~ ° - - ' - A' a+av - ~ ~ • li4 • 33 .33 - ' 34 ` :C , ; 4.~. . S`~wt'(`1 ~ ~ n~ C • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • `VW • ~ ~ ~ \O • • ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ • ~ ~ 1. V ~ , M ~It ~ • ' 33 3 r, l . ~ ~ . ~ 6_~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~-e ~--------~~x~~ - • • i • ~ 11 ~ { s ~ ~ / . C~ ~ 'o A . M ~ ♦ c ~ • ~ ~ 1' ` ~ ~ • ~ m~~1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . • w a t as 2010 ~ • 'c ` • VhCDLCl r ~ / ' , ~I~ ~ ~ 4 ~ as~ o : , J' ~ ` ' "•i-~ / ~ _ L i • ' ( ~t ~ o~" ~ 'l . . . ~ . • ~ ~ . • • • • • ~ - / t~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ • • • Cr 1 • • ~ 4u ♦ • • ~ ~f\ j ~ ~ 1 v < < V"-'~ ' ' • • ' • o . • • ~s- ~ ~ ' ' ~ BM . . . • ~ Q• ~ ' V~1e11 . ~ ' • ~ • f~~ jp/~. + ~ ti i ~ • . • C . ~ti • c • a; • • ; ; o • ~C"r • , / 1/~ t ~ O 'VI 1 r / • ~ ► ~ ' . • • j' ~ \J ~ : O d ~ / ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ . 1 1~ ~ / r ~ i 1 ! I ` • J Q ~ \ ` \ " ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ •o ; ~8 , 9I95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 I I rm rp ?age PAGF -3 UF-LLI ' , . . , ZEm30m95 r~ I -iS080 . C y . ~ t , lrs ~E r w n ~a en , ~ E ~c~~ ~ An ' ' ~ , • 12$ _ .t ~t th ~~rc~r, ~ ' '•t ' S -ioa ~ vE" 9, 28 ~-i~• ~ _ r , 1 ~ . _ ~ ' Well 'Y`aQm~~4 ~ t r ° ..r 1 BM 199 ~ .h ~oa ~ ~c„ r ~ ' •s - ~ ~ - ~ ~t4- ° 33 33 34 . ~s ~ Ci''' t ~ i r,• , f ~~y ; ;,7 ° - % t.J~ fr~ ~ • / G . ~ ~ ` q „ "i /1 i~ + tf~i" ir ~ r ♦ rt~ r~y • • ~ r J~.~ t ~ ~ /ii . ~rit~ ~j~ i ~ti iY. ~ /A r r , ,J ~ ~ ~ ~ r r^'' ' ~i l : ~ `'s' ..t ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ri° ~ .;~%'~..''j r~ 1j'~af 3i ~it , Q~ ~ • ~~~J )it ./'I t ji ~ ~ ~j,,.~~/..~r.._..t ~~.;~f i . ~ 3 / I/ , ~y _ !`+~=~A dflD~~l'~ ~~i~Y~~° ~ ~ ' ` ~ l ,i•~~ i Y , ~ > •r~~ ~ •'^r t ~r ~ ! i!'_~/~ •rt ~y~i' iy~l ~ ~ i.i. ~~i `ri•.v~~ t ~il 7 ~ ~ /a`~' S rs". x 3 • i / ' ,.%..r, ~ ; -~vy ° . ~ K ~ ' : i Q~ ~ ! , ti~ ~rn✓~~48: ` ~ t ~ r. ~ • ~ r L~~f f %~r 1 4 f.~; r if~ i Q ~.lG ~ :.~~~F ~ ..a. F"~ v i 7f" ! v ~ 1't ~ { ✓ ✓i ~ r ' ~ r- • s ~ ~ k88 r ~ Y ' ~i ~ : r , 2f~/Q'r, ~ci'`.'• ~ ~ • Q ~ i . i% .`r~( `Yr C • ` ~ }C ~ Q~ ~~.x~~. 'J ~ ~ ~f s.s ~~~ir i ~i~i'r • ~V', r~ f•^^ LLi~i~i Y i itb~- I • ~ I ~ 'yjr ~ „LN'+aJ_t , i 'y ~ •jj J^~y~~ .(i 'r i ,`,,'Y~ ~ y .L•~ t. y•~-~ ' ~ r' rv ~ ~ ~ .t ~ i ~O y-.1~~v r' l- ' ~ ~ r MR r! " • ~ ti'¢;~' Y~ ~~~/•~~r~ f~ i,•{~^ Iw ^ r q,~,=+ ~ .~a.,s~. °~''"'s < I~,~ ~ r " f/ ~'rr' iiJ r ri y~ ~'r•; ~ i•♦ r' {y`~ N ; •I ~ ~ j ~ I ` R j'f ~r•~~' i _ , j ~k r • i- N~~ /n f~F ,~S .lr~~ z~~.~ y% r . • j \ . ' ~ r~, , i . , j h'~` ~ r ~ ~ ~"a ~ .a -h•A s • ~ ~ J ~ ~-v ~ - = + • • ♦ • • ♦ ~ ~ r~ : s y~ ~ " ~ . ~ r i! j ~ ~ ~ ~ s T ~ ~ " ~ • ~ j~"~ o i 2. ~ ~ i~! ~i • T~v ~ r i i, ~ r t ~ r _ w~. t, : • r % ` ; n~p ~ f~-'~.. f~~~,:~? . O ~ ~ • Q ~ . ~ ~ - ~ r?,n ~ y` ~ . ~ . i i ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ qw ~ -'r • • +I~ ..lr ~ !4. ~t ~T..~ 11 ~ ~ '~,q' . ' ~ ~ 'i I~{i . ♦ j << ~ ~ • • ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' ~it~~;! ri ~ ~ ~.7e ~ ~ ~ .i ~ . • K , _ ~ ~I ;I _ ~ µ : 1 ~ • ~ ~ ~ p•~ 6 j r' ~ j ~ ' ' t.'.ij~ . ~ r~L • O ~ t ~ /~t.Y , i i} ~ ~ 'i ; 'r { ~ K ~ i 4b • ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ - : . 1 t M r~. ~ f • • • ' 'J' f ~ ~P.~i • ~y~~~. ~ ~ • • ~ ~ ~ . ~ /~r ~ ~f - : G r ~ ~r ~ ` ~ J~ fl ~ i'C+~ .~i } O' • 4 ~ • • f I I 1 7\ C~~ .~~~v ~ Qs s 7 • ~ I ~ , r.~~ ~ ~ a • ~r„~. r ' y- a ~ . , . - , , r,,.10 N-11 ~ ~ ' .s'.',~~f7,,, ' : " ll " ,.s t z i ; _ i.. A "vF + y~~l f _rd~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ir•~ 4 ,.x' ysa i i~yll l ~ ~^~r ~,i1 ♦ ~Tl~y~~a~f~ O ' ~ % _ ~~'~l~. 1r s. ~ ~1L~•`<'' ~ ~ ~ F~' ~~S ,,~,r ` • • ' ~ < < ' 4r ~ / • t 5 + > . ~ r ~ 'rr~ f ? • ~ , ~ , ' ~ ~ ~ IJ'% ' ~ ' ti''f_ f ~ . t' 1 - - ~.J t ~5 _ \ - ~;~3^ a 'c ,\J ~~r:._~~~-~ - Nk i ~t1~;~ ~ ~ 1'~ ~ 9I95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 PACE y UF d,6 r1. ~ ~ NNI ~ 70 Ns' ~ iA ~ 44 nY, `r : co ' t~0 ~ " SL au 5~ - ~ - . I s"L. ~U) co _ ~ ~ ~ CJ co1. ~j < 1.. ~ ~ ~ ID tt - ~ ~ ~ t ~ , 'dc) ~ ~ ~ ~x~ ~ `~~,y ~ ~ l ~ o! , ~ i OC) ~ t ~ ° ~+r~G. ~ ~ 1 t~ tt~ ti _1. ~.~f t t of o . LC)A- ►zUA 4~ oF ~.,Lr c.j ► . 05 . DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1995 SUBJECT: ZE-30-95; ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-7 (UR-7) TO REGIONAL BUSINESS (B-3) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Pam Ayers East 11518 East Dishman Niica Road Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 922-2007 Contact Planner: Steve Davenport Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Dishman Niica Road, west of and adjacent to Hatherly Cucle, and approxunately 150 feet east of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman IV&ca Road in Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Wastungton Proposal: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone History The apphcant received a Home Profession Pernut (HPE-10-93) in 1993 to operate a beauty shop on the site. A Home Profession is defined as "a profession or craft camed on witlun a residence by the occupants, which activity is clearly incidental to the use of said residence as a dwelluig and does not change the residential character of the dwelling or neighborhood, and is conducted Ln such a manner as to not give any outward appearance of a business in the ordinary meaning of the term " Home professions are requued to comply with specific cntena to qualify for a home profession pernut II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: Approximately 6,500 square feet B. Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan The property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, the Prionty Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone The Urban category is intended to provide for a"citylike" envuonment with primanly intensive residential development 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 1 IrEnn # U PAGE 6 OF l Y . ~ i Major commercial uses are considered noncompatible within the Urban category The proposed rezone to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The detailed definition for the Urban category specifically identifies major commercial uses as noncompatible. The Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive commercial zone and is used to unplement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Arterial Road Plan: The site is adjacent to Dishman 1Vhca Road wluch is identified as a Principal Arterial with a future nght of way width of 100 feet. In order to unplement the Arterial Road Plan, the County Engineer has requested that a stnp of property 20 feet in width along Dishman Mica Road be set aside as a Future Acquisition Area (FAA) C. Site Characteristics The site is a relatively flat residential lot with an existing home that is currently being used as a beauty salon. A gravel lot to the north and east of the house provides parking D. Neighborhood Characteristics The site is located in a manufactured home subdivision with 341ots Other uses in the area include some commercial uses adjacent to Dishman Niica Road and single fa.rruly residential neighborhoods E . Zoning Analysis Proposal Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) estabhshed in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70) North Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural (A) (12-67). South Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) established in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70) East: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) established in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70). West Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991, previously zoned Commercial (C) (36-82C) Zorung witlun the viciruty of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman Mica Road has included past approvals for business uses Pnor to Spokane County adopting the Comprehensive Plan in 1980, three commercial rezones had been approved In 1952 an area at the northwest corner of Bowdish and Dishman 1Vhca was rezoned from Agncultural to Commercial (ZE-79-52) In 1967 the area duectly west of the proposal was rezoned from Agncultural to Local Business, and in 1977 the area at the southwest corner of Bowdish and Dishman Mica was rezoned from Agncultural to Local Business (ZE-105-77C). Since the adoption of Spokane County's Comprehensive Plan, two additional business zones have been approved The Local Business zone directly east of the proposal was rezoned to Commercial (ZE-36-82C) in 1982, and an area south of Dishman Mica and£tst of Bowdish Road was rezoned from Urban Residential-3 5 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 2 IrEnn y PACE ~ OF /V . to Regional Business (ZE-21-93C) in 1993. See the attached zoning map for current zone designations which were implemented with the adoption of the Spokane Counry Zoning Code in 1991. F. Land Use, Analysis: The proposal is within the unincorporated community of Chester which includes residential uses and established commercial uses to serve the area. Commercial uses ane lacated along the north and south side of Dishman Mica Road. Most residential use is located in areas fu,rther north or south from Dishman Mica Road, although some existing single family residences and a manufactured home are located along Dishman Mica. Site: One single-fanuly residence and beauty salon. North: Vacant. South: Single family residence. East: Single fanuly residence West: Gas station. G. Circulation: Dishman Mlca Road and Hatherly Cucle will provide direct access to the site. H . Design: Proposed Site Plan: The site plan as subnutted does not comply with the rrununum development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone. Comphance can not be attained because the site size of 6,500 ft does not provide an adequate area to meet the nurumum requuements for parking, landscaping and setbacks The exlstulg use, which requues the owner to hve on-site and linuts the extent of the business, is pernutted through a home profession perrrut Any redevelopment or expansion would lilcely not be pernutted due to site constraints Development Standards Pronosed Reauued Lot Area 6,500 sq. ft No rrununum Budduig Coverage 13% 60% maximum Building Height not specified 35 ft. maximum Parktng 3 8 nununum Setbacks Front Yard Dishman 1Vlica Road 0 feet 35 ft Flanking Street Yard Hatherly Cucle 20 feet 40 ft from lot line Side yard (south) 16 feet 15 feet Rear yard (west) 32 feet 15 feet Note: Front yard setback measured from Future Acquisition Area (FAA) 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 3 ITEM PAGE ~ Or I T • • j~ ♦ Proposed Buffering/Laadscaping Techniques: The proposed site plan does not illustrate sufficient landscaping to meet the min.imum requuements specified by Chapter 14.806 (Landscaping and Screening Standards) of the Zoning Code. Chapter 14.806 would requue 20 feet of Type I landscaping along the south property llne and five feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to Dishman IVLca Road and Hatherly Circle. Other Site Plan Considerations: The site plan subnutted for review by the Hearing Exanuner Committee is general in nature Detailed review to deternune compliance with all Code regulations and condltions of approval is recommended to be admuustrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage. I. Drainage A drainage plan is required This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department pnor to development J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements None illustrated Any recorded or requued easements will be disclosed dunng the bi.uld.ing pernut process K. Water Supply The proposal is within the Chester Waterworks Water District L. Sewage Disposal Sewage disposal will be accomplished by an on-site system as authonzed by the County Health Distnct. Double plumbing for new construction is required by the County Utihties Department to facihtate connection to a future sewer system M. School The proposal is in the Central Valley School Distrlct No 356 The School District did not respond to the proposal N. Fire Protection The proposal is within Fire Distnct No 1 The Fire District and the Division of Bulldings Department (Fue Marshall) are requued to approve fire protection provisions pnor to issuance of building perm.its O Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on site P. Cultural Resources None have been identified Q. Flood Hazard Area: The County Engineer has deternuned that the proposal is situated pai-tially or wholly withln a 100 year flood hazard area The applicant is required to obtain a floodplain development pemut pnor to any development on the site The requuements for th.is area are that no more than 5% of the floodpla.tn can be covered with impervious surfaces and the lowest floor, cluding subgrade floors be at or above the flood level elevation for that area, or t structure need to be flood proofed to that elevation R Critical Areas None identified 0 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 4 ITfl+~1 PACE 7 Or--I-Y • . III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible staadard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County pohcies and guideli.nes. The Planning Department has determined that "No probable significant adverse unpacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was cuculated to 13 other agencies of junsdiction and other agencies/ departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment penod ends September 19, 1995 and was advert.ised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent properiy owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notrce on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Exarruner may consider addstional envuonmental related testunony at the public heanng. IV. DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY The proposed Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the Urban category of the Spokane Counry Comprehensive Plan. The Plan states that major commercial uses are noncompatible in Urban category. In add.ition to being inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the site lacks adequate land area to comply with many of the development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone and is located ln a flood hazard area which poses sigruficant obstacles to development for commercial purposes. The potential for stnp commercial development along the Dishman Mica corndor would increase with approval of add.iuonal commercial use zones V . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. i i. The zone reclassification applies to the following real pcoperty: Lot 1, Block 1, Hatherly's Subdivision, according to plat recorded in Volume 7 of Plats, Page 71, Spokane Counry, Washsngton. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) and Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay (ASA) Zones, as amended. 2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heanng Body Vanations, when approved by the Planning Duector/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not Lmited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All variations must 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 5 1TEM # y PACE /D pr[~. • ~R'~t • 1 conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintauned. 3. Approval is required by the Plannuig Duector/designee of a specific hghtulg and signing plan for the described property pnor to the release of any building pernuts. 4. Direct light from any exterior area hghting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. A specif'ic landscape plan, plantrng schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be subnutted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 6. The Division of Btulding and Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane Counry Aud.itor a Title Notice notuig that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as pubhc notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded wittun the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ J is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane Couaty Planning Department. .7. The Division of Bwlding and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notice, wtuch shall generally provide as follows "Pnor to the issuance of any building pernut for any building or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of tlus notice is more particularly descnbed as follows: . " 8. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planiung shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utilitAes. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following a At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utlhties along Dishman Mica Road. b Future building and other setbacks requued by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area c No required landscaping, parlung, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located wittun the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utilities If 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 6 iTEM y PAGF I/ Or I V . . ; any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. _ d. The future acquisition area, until acquued, shall be private property and may be use.d as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "intenm" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acqwsition area. 9. The applicant shall contact the Division of Budding and Planning at the earhest possible stage m order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authonzed by the State Btulding Code Act Design/development concerns include. Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibihty, construction type, occupancy classif'ication, exiting, extenor wall protecuon, and energy code regulations. (Note• The Department of Buildings reserves the nght to confum the actual address at the ume of building pernut ) ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 0 1~ U ' Pnor To Issuance Of A Building Pernut Or Use Of The Property As Proposed ' 1 Access pernu for approaches to the Counry Road System shall be obtained from the County Engin r ~ 2 The aPPhcant sh subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. ~ 3 The appl~cant shall sub~ut for approval by the Spokane Counry Engineer and the ~ Spokane County Health\ istnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and ~ surface water disPosal Pl for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the development is to be phased J41J 4 A parking plan and traffic cuc atron plan shall be subnvtted and approved by the Spokane Counry Engineer The esign, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with stand traffic engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Enginee will be required for any porUon of the project which is to be occupied or traveled b vehlcles 5 The construction of the road improveme s stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane Counry Enginee 6 The County Engineer has designated a Pnnci ~ Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Dishman Mica Road wtuch is jacent to the proposed development Ttus will requue the addition of approximately 1 to 14 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development The construction of rbing and sidewalk is also required. 7 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Ro dway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court wtuch is adjacent to the proposed development Tlus 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 7 ITEM ~4 f y PAGE /Q QF . ' will requue the addltion of appromrnately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development C bing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed 8. All requued improve ents shall conform to the current State of Wastungton Standard Specifications for Roa and Bndge Construction and other appLcable County standards andlor adopted resolut~ ns pertairung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of c nstruction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 9 Roadway standards, rypic roadway sections and drainage plan requuements are found in Spokane Board of Count ~Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. , ,10. The regulations of the National ~lood Insurance Program shall be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a flo d hazard zone. A development pernut shall be obtained from the County Enginee before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazar one (reference Spokane County Ordinance No 80-0726) 11 No construction work shall be perform~d within the existing or proposed public nght- of-way until a pernut has been issued by\the County Engineer All work within the public road right-of-way is subject to insp'e~tion and approval by the County Engineer , 12 All requued construction witlun the existing\or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed pnor to the release of a building pe~rrut, or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer ~ , ~ 13 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Dishma~ N1ica Road as a Pnncipal Artenal The existing nght-of-way width of 60 feet is not co~sistent with that specified in the Plan In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, ~jn addition to the requued nght-of- way dedication, a stnp of property 20 feet in width afQng the Dishman Mica frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by `S-pokane County at the time when artenal improvements are made to Dishman 1VLca~Road ~ 14 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utiliti s, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, includ.ing propert~ to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition Spokane County assumes no financi obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utillties Applicant( should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocat~ n costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work 15 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Sp ane Counry nght of way per Spokane County Standards 16 The applicant shall provide documentat-ton through a flood study that no ore than 5°l0 of the site shall contain impervious surface and that the commercial structure shall be floodproof PJ 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 8 ITEM ~ y PAGF /3 C r ~y _ . . . Z SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. A covenant agreement shall be signed stating The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petrtion for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' properiy. PROVIDED, this cond.ition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either peution or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water sernce for this project shall be provided in accordance vyith the Coorcimated Water system Plan for Spokane County; as amended. 3 Pursuant to the Board of County Comrrussioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authonzed. This authonzation is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health Distnct and is further conditioned and subject to specific apphcation approval and issuance of pernuts by the Health Distnct. 4 Each new unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide collection systems. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane County Health Distnct pnor to the issuance of any on-site sewage disposal pernut or building pernut for this project 2 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 4 Water service shall be by an emsting public water supply when approved by the Regional engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health 5 Subject to specif'ic application approval and issuance of pernuts by the Health Officer, the use of an indivldual on-site sewage disposal system may be authonzed Note Due to the small size of the lot, the liquid waste coordinator shall be contacted to establish maximum daily flow rates for the parcel 6 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is protubited 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 9 ITEM 4! PAG=_Z C; ~ S~ , • • ~ - , SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (REVISED PER 9/18/95 MEMO) Pnor To Lssuance Of A Buildi.ng Pernut Or Use Of The Froperty As Proposed: 1. No duect access be allowed from Dishman Mica Road. 2. Access pernuts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 3. The apphcant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 4. The applicant shall subrrut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Distnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the enti.re project, or portion thereof, if the development is to be phased. 5. A parlcing plan and traffic cuculation plan shall be subrrutted and approved by the Spokane Counry Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the Counry Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane Counry Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court wluch is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed 8. All requued improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requuements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 10. The regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program shall be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a flood hazard zone A development pernut shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins wittun any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance No 80-0726) 11. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public right- of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work wittun the public road right-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9/95 HEC Staff Reporc for ZE-30-95 Page 10 1 ; ' r 12 All reqLUred construction witlun the existing or proposed public nght-of-way is to be completed pnor to the release of a builcung permit, or a bond in an amount estunated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane Counry Notice to the Public No 6 wluch specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or be hereafter denved, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) m interest hereby request and authonze Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below by requestulg and authorizing Spokane Counry to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requestmg and authonzing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030, and/or by not filing a protest agauist the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW. If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said the owner(s) and successor(s) further agree. (a) that the unprovement or construction contemplated witlun the proposed RID is feasible, (b) that the benefits to be denved from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (c) that the property withln the proposed RID is sufficiently developed Provided themselves, their heus, grantees, assign(s) and successor(s) shall retain the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Coinrrussioners confirnung the final assessment roll; provided fiuther, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements requued shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the unprovements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in thls agreement sha11 expue after ten (10) years from the date of execution below Ttus provision is applicable to Dishman Mica Road 14 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Dishman 1VEca Road as a 100 foot Pnncipal Artenal. The existing nght-of-way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, in addition to the requued nght-of-way dedication, a stnp of property 20 feet in width along the Dishman IVhca 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 11 ♦ ~ 1 ` frontage be set aside in reserve. Ttus property may be acquued by Spokane County at the time when arterial unprovements are made to Dishman Niica Road. 15. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utihties, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) shauld check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Sgokane County Engineer to determune whether apphcant(s) or the utiliry is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make anrangements for any necessary work 16. The apphcant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane Counry nght of way per Spokane County Standards. 17. The applicant shall provide documentataon that no more than 5% of the floadplain shall be covered with impervious surfaces If more than 5% of the slte is to be covered wrth impervious surfaces an engineenng analysis must be completed to address disposal of floodwaters The analysis must show that infiltration of floodwater can continue to occur as it did pnor to development of the site The commerc2al structure shall be floodproof 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 12 T ~ SPOKANE COIJNTY HEARING EXANIINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION Tlus matter has come before the Heanng Examiner Committee on September 21, 1995 The members of the Committee present are: Donald Moore, Chair, Brenda Bodenstein and Frank Yuse PROPOSAL The sponsor, Pamela Ayers, requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-30-95, from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beaury salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The properiy is generally located south of and adjacent to Dishman 1VIica Road, west of and adjacent to Hatherly Cucle, and approxunately 150 feet east of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman IVIica Road in Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington 2 The Comrruttee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of tius record 3. The existing land uses in the area include commercial businesses adJacent to Dishman Mica Road, vacant land, and single farruly residential uses 4 The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses in the area 5 The property is located wittun the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone. The Urban category is intended to provide for a"citylike" environment with pnmanly intensive residential development Major commercial uses are considered noncompatible within the Urban category The proposed rezone to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The detailed defirution for the Urban category specifically identifies major commercial uses as noncompatible The Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive commercial zone and is used to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan 6 The proposed zorung does not implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan 7 The site is adjacent to Dishman Mica Road which is identified as a Pnncipal Artenal with a future nght of way width of 100 feet In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, the County Engineer has requested that a stnp of propeRy 20 feet in width along Dishman ivbca Road be set aside as a Future Acquisiuon Area (FA.A) ffEm # 3 ~ PAGE ~ OF ~ 1 ~ 8. The existing zoning of the properiy described in the appLcation,is Urban Residential-7 (tJR-7) previously estabhshed as Residential Manufactured Home (][ZMH) zoning in 1970 and redesignated to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code The proposal does not conform to the requirements of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone. 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Pohcy Act) have been complied with and a Deternunation of Nonsigaificance (DNS) was issued. The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. 10. The legal reqturements for public notice have been fulfilled. 11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use 12. The apphcant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the onglnal zoning of tlus area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is not justified. 13. The proposed use may be detnmental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 14. The Cornnuttee addltionally finds/concludes: a. The applicant d.id not adequately illustrate that the site could meet rrununum development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone or the Spokane County Floodplaun Ordinance b. Site constraints including small lot size and location in a flood hazard area severely lirrut the use of the site for commercial purposes 1TEN1 PAGE pF 3 . HEC Order for ZE-30-95 Page 2 ~ . ORDER The Heanng Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Find.ings of Fact and Conclusion, DENIES the application of Pamela Ayers for the Zone Reclassif'ication from Urban Residendal-7 (UR-7) to Regional Busuzess (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone as described in the apphcation ZE-30-95. Motion by: Frank Yuse Seconded by. Brenda Bodenstein Vote: (3-0) [JNANIMOUS TO DENY'IHE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HEARIlNG E R COIVuvIITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FIIVDINGS, O R VOTE ~ X. G~% bIx . CHAIR ~ ATTEST ~ For STACY BJORDAHI. Acting Pubhc Heanngs Manager ~ Y (;14 Be JOHN W PEDERSON Senior Planner ~/AS DATE Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal ttus wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of County Comnussioners wrthun ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public heanng will be scheduled if you desue to file such an appeal, you must subrrut a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$215 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building and Planning at (509) 456-2205. ITEM# 3 PAGE 3 OF 3 HEC Order for ZE-30-95 Page 3 ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter has come before the Hearing Exanuner Comrruttee on September 21, 1995. The members of the Committee present are Donald Moore, Chair, Brenda Bodenstein and Frank Yuse PROPOSAL The sponsor, Pamela Ayers, requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-30-95, from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1 The property is generally located south of and adjacent to Dishman 1VIica Road, west of and adjacent to Hatherly Circle, and approxinately 150 feet east of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman 1Vhca Road in Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2 The Comrruttee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of tlus record 3 The existing land uses in the area include commercial businesses adjacent to Dishman 1Vbca Road, vacant land, and single family residential uses. 4 The proposed use is not compatible with exlsting uses in the area 5 The property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, the Prionty Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone The Urban category is intended to provide for a"citylilce" environment with pnmanly intensive residential development Major commercial uses are considered noncompatible witlun the Urban category The proposed rezone to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The detailed definition for the Urban category specically identifies major commercial uses as noncompatible. The Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive commercial zone and is used to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan. 6 The proposed zorung does not implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan 7. The site is adjacent to Dishman Mica Road which is identified as a Prulcipal Arterial with a future nght of way width of 100 feet. In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, the County Engineer has requested that a strip of property 20 feet in width along Dishman 1Vbca Road be set aside as a Future Acquisition Area (FAA) ~ 1 , 8 The existing zoning of the property descnbed in the apphcation is Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) previously estabhshed as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) zorung in 1970 and redesignated to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code The proposal does not conform to the requirements of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Pohcy Act) have been complied with and a Deternunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued. The Cornmittee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. 10 The legal requuements for public notice have been fulfilled 11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dlsapproval of the proposed use 12. The applicant has not demonstrated that cond.itions have substantially changed since the original zorung of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is not justified. 13 The proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies 14. The Comrruttee addltionally finds/concludes: a The apphcant did not adequately illustrate that the srte could meet minunum development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone or the Spokane County Floodplain Ordinance. b Site constraints including small lot size and location in a flood hazard area severely linut the use of the site for commercial purposes HEC Order for ZE-30-95 Page 2 ~ r-~ ORDER The Heanng Exanuner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, DENIES the apphcation of Pamela Ayers for the Zone Reclassif'ication from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beaury salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone as described in the applicatron ZE-30-95 Motion by: Frank Yuse Seconded by: Brenda Bodenstein Vote: (3-0) LJNANIMOUS TO DENY THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HEARING E R COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO TBE ABOVE FINDINGS, O R VOTE ~ •G~~~ ~ CHAIR ~ ~ ATTEST: For STACY BJORDAHL Acting Public Heanngs Manager Be JOHN W. PEDERSON Seruor Planner DATE Pursuant to Spokane Counry regulations, any aggrieved party has the nght to appeal tlus written decision to the Spokane Counry Board of County Coinrrussioners within ten (10) calendar days of the sigrung of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desue to file such an appeal, you must subrrut a wntten appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$215 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Division of Buildirig and Planrung at (509) 456-2205. HEC Order for ZE-30-95 Page 3 RECEIVED - NO 95-1145 0 C T 2 3 19b BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, SP4KANE COUNTY ENGINEER WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF CONCERNING ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION ZE-030-95 URBAN ) NOTICE OF RESIDENTIAL-7 TO REGIONAL BUSINESS ) PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT PAMELA S AYERS ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Applicant, Pamela S Ayers, has filed Notice of Appeal of the dernal by the Hearing Examiner Commrttee of above captioned application for zone reclassification, and NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane Counry, Washmgton, will conduct a public hearing TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995, AT 5 00 P M (or as soon as possible thereafter) COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 6UILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 to consider this proposed zone reclassrfication from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business zone on property Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Dishman-Mica Road and Hatherly Circle in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washmgton NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposai NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbaily or in writing m support of or in opposition to this application The Board reserves the rrght to impose time limrts on speakers, as deemed necessary The Board's meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals For more particular information with respect to the accessibility of the Fublic Works Builaing, Commissioners' Assembly Room, please contact Rosanne Montague, Clerk of the Board, at (509) 456-2265 BY ORDER OF THE 60ARD this 10 day of October, 1995 WILLIAM E DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD 4~ROQMNE MONTAGUE, DEP 0 CY I 1 1991" 0lSTR16WTION - DATE. DEPT G(IL~.STATE EXAM~ PUBUSH 10/1 _APPEAL FlLE/HEATHER' ZE030NOT 1010 „ e ' , ZEm30m95 Cr - L-.t M OR. ( ~ . . . 't~• ,1' ~ - ? . _ ~ . ~ rj . ~ W ,t 30th Ave ~ ~ _,~0~, . ~ . • • . . ~ ~ - x • 4 • . ~ ' o. ' v ~ ' ' , • ~ • . . ;j~ • : >3 ( s t • :2 W : Ave • 3 :1 • , , ~ ~ve ~ ~ w - '..o• . . • : . ; Q • • . • . . ° ~ 31 ST ~ '•~32nd Ave ~ t'e ' 3 ~ ~ : _ . ~ . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~•~33 RY~~~VE fZm. &YE O • ~•4, : J . . . . . • ~ LJ • • v ~1 . Y ~3 ~ . ~4 TN ' • AVE~ ! 1 •~tLU~ : ~ ~~~~~•~i i ~ •'i~~~4~~+1~~:1'/:•~I~ r.,~,y b • • . . • • 34TN ' • • ~ • ~ 2 : . 3sTK ~ve_ _ ~ 14.' ~ ; C 1 ~ ~ • • . ~ ~ • ~ ~ . , ~ . . . . . . . _ 3 , ~ r--- ~ • . ~ . - , Z j• J • 14uLA ~ • S 35~ 1O ` Q~ I ~ 0 • • ( ~I ' ' ~ ' . ' / G . . 3S?N GT. . • ~1 , i I o AVE . , , ~ • ~ . . ~ ,y ~ y ~ ~ / -.6 . J 3'1 T K Q~ Av E~• ' ~..1 . . ~ ~ . rT~ . . . . a . - - . • _ ~ ~ ~ mwRwi ~ti ~ ' • a is ~C Z ; ' ^ a ~ ~ Z\ • ~ / T8 a~ ~ ~ ♦ ~ ~ : 7 ~ ` ~ , , ~ ~ ~ pTN, 2a 1 .y ZO ) ~ • ~ • • .n'1 ~ • . o I , : 4Z ~ • : r m W i ~ . I Z c • ~ T Q . • G'~ ~ ? s~ ' ~ 1 44114 ~ az ~ n .--I r . . 1 3 v' , q CNF-srrQ ~ ti r ~ TE►'~~ i ~ ~ ~ fi GLpSUQc . ~ E N ~CEM --ti , . . . . . ; J..:~~...•.i~. ...~LL~• 'i • • I~`• r~ 11J~ ~ _ l ~ - - ~ W - 3 ~ ~ ~ GGT lJ /a14 E ~ CE ~ • • W O G - ct ~ Z 4TTU c~- LL) ~ ix 48 TN 3: Z: 4 ~ Z• . J F t k K L T L q ~.J - c . . - z~ , C 2 Ca~ ~ 0a. f O~'~oy ~ ` ~ ' C • -.FROM:OMNIFAX T0: 4564?15 SEP 29, 1995 1:59PM P.02 TO THE BOARD QF COUNTY COMMISSiONERS APPEAL FEE - 1216 NAME; e TODAY'S DATE ADDRESS:,F . ~ • XMr1 Yj=NzP CODE (:?qa3_(D HOME PHONE: BUSINESS PHONE: NEARING EXAMINER ACTION BEING APPEALED PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NAME PRELIMINARY SUBDIViSION NUMBER - ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER DATE OF HEARING INER COMMITTEE ACT70N SIGNATURE OF APPELIANT S ejs,~. 4 % SLO Qat~~ SIGNATURE OF AUTHQRIZED REPRESENTATIYE ADDRESS YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL ' 1~ ~ s 1 J1~ Q . ~ . . ~ JL ~ S tr 1►. ~ • _ ~►c~ oL..-j - - C oue l? FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ~ Copies to: Planning Engineers Environmental Health Fea received: Check Cash Nk. Receipt Number . Hearing Date "7q ,3W . - . . r • - R~~~~~,5--~n c f 1 r NOV 2 91995 1 1 -27-95 . SPUiu~.:. t c-~.Gti~EE Spokane County _ ~ Board of County Commissioners ~1' W.1116 Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 ~ RE: ZE-30-95 Request for Reconsideration (Ayers) Members of the Board, You may recall that I, Dwight Hume, represent Pam Ayers regarding [he above matter. She has FAXED me the three documents pertaining to this request. (Oral Decision #95-1263, 11-14-95 Ady Letter, and the Dempsey letter of 11-22-95 to Pam Ayers). From my review of these documents I offer the following comments andlor suggestions on her behaIf as requested in the Dempsey letter. 1) t)RAL llEC'ISION #95-1263 Please correct the 6th line wherein it states: "....Urban Residential - 22 Zone,..." This should be Regional Business Zone B-3. (It is my understanding that this may already be corrected). 2) 11-14-95 Ady t er Your record is clear that they were given proper legal notice in a timely manner. Pam has confirmed that aIl other adjacent owners received their notice as well. Exactly why they were not in attendance is beyond me. But thirty other people took the time to come down on election niaht ir1 tiie snow and inclement weather to support the rerone. T'he second paragraph complains about the fact that they,(Ady's) had to comply with the flood insurance program when it I appears my client will not have to. They simply weren't at the second hearing to learn what my client had done to overcome the concerns of the Hearings Examiner Committees reasons for denial. In other words, since the first hearing, she retained the services of a land use planning consultant and a civil engineer to demonstrate how the site could comply with the applicabie regulations affecting this site. In fact, Commissioner Harris asked Chuck Simpson to affirm on 4 . i _ 2 Ayers Reconsideration Continued the record that the drainage issue could be engineered to an approvable design. (Which he affirmed could be done). Accordingly, a new site plan was approved and modifications to the previous conditions of approval are being drafted to reflect the new site plan. With regard to their suggestion that the site be conditioned to limit the use within the B-3 zone to that of a beauty salon and nothing else, I submit the following comment. The site was advertised as a beauty salon or any other uses of the B-3 zone. T h e site size and configuration will limit the use of the site to very few other uses. Consequently, I do not see a purpose in making Pam pay for, (and wait for) a public hearing just to have rights and privileges the Ady's enjoy outright. Let the site constraints dictate the use. From all of our prior dealings with these people, it is clear they do not want competition. But what can compete on our 7000 sf of dirt that would hurt their business? Who else in the neighborhood has a concern for "other uses" permitted in the B-3 zone? That's what was advertised and still, no one came in opposition. Had Ady's been there, they would have been the only ones to complain. The other 30 attending were in favor. I can only conclude that the Ady's are unaware of the revised site plan, unaware of the engineering research regarding flooding, unaware of the amended access to the site, unaware of the parking requirements and solutions and unaware of the 244 signatures in favor and the numerous neighbors and friends who cared enough to spend their evening on Pam's behalf to support this rezone, for this and all other allowed uses of the B-3 zone. Let the record stand and deny the request for reconsideration. No new evidence can possibly be generated that would alter the Boards decision. 3) Dempsev tetter of 11-22-95 Pursuant to this letter we are responding to the request for reconsideration as stated above and as follows: The last paragraph of page 1 of said letter suggest that the Board amend the Division of Building and Planning Condition #2 to strictly limit the use of the site v , r ~ " 3 Ayers Reconsideration Continued to a beauty salon unless reviewed by the public hearing process. As stated above, this is unjustifiable and inequitable to the rights and privileges allowed the Ady's on their B-3 site. Contrary to the "Oral Decision" intent, the application was advertised for more than this use and we testified that the site size and other constraints will severely limit other uses anyway. We simply don't foresee any use that will both, fit and be intense enough to generate any public concerns. Remember, we only have 7000 sf. of dirt, (before dedications). Since numerous amendments were approved in the site plan and the staff conditions for access andlor improvements to roads, we see a need for careful review and rewording of the conditions of approval. These revisions could be written per the following, with the "revised language" in italics. SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLASJNING 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance with the revised site plan of record presented to the Board of County Cornmissioners. Variations, when approved by the Planning Director/designee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building location, Iandscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zone Code. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (REVISED PER 9/18/95 MEMO). Note: Review these conections with Scot Engelhard for his concurrence. 1) Access per the revised site plan of record will be permitted on Dishmara Mica Rd.. Access to Hatherly Court is optional though not shown on the revised site plan of record. If access is proposed, improvements to Hatherly Court as described ira Cortdition #7 below may be deferred and completed as a subsequent RID uraless the use or intensity of use changes in which case, improvements wall be required prior to the change of intensity or use. In conclusion, I would suggest that the request for reconsideration be denied; that the Findings and Order be prepared . , 4 Ayers Reconsideration Continued with revisions per above or as modified by staff to accomplish this intent. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please include myself in any future correspondence and/or decision on the above matter. My address and phone number are as follows: Suite 325, S. 107 Howard St. Spokane, Wa. 99204 456-7402 (Voice) 456-7357 (FAX) Respectfully submitted, Dwight J. Hume CC: Pam Ayers Mike Dempsey Stacy Bjordahl ~ r . t ~ ]~NGINEER' S REVMW SHEET UzoNe Mr4 ZE-030-95 _95 ' . . RelaEod FUc # . c=~ . Date to Review 9/21I95 # 3 Date to A.A & DR 08-09-93 Time 2;15 Date Received 7/26/95 Project Name UR-3.5 TO B-3 BEAUTY SALON No. i.acs Q No. Acres 7,OOOS Range - Township - Section SITE ADDRESS S DISHMAN MICA E 11518/E BOWDISH/W PARCEL f# 45334.0201 HATH14RLY CIR Applicant's Name PAMELA *5 AYERS Phone # 922-2007 Address 11518 E DISHMAN MICA Phone 2# SPOKANE WA 99206 FLOOD ZONE Yes W S School Datc:s Conditions mailcd Owner PAMELA & ROBERT A Engitteer / Surveyor's / Architect CHARJ.PS STMPSON Address 11518 E DISHMAN SIMPSQN ENGINEERS INC. MICA . SPOKANE WA 99206 . Phone 922-2007 Address 909 N ARGONNE RD Phone / FAX SPOKANE WA 99212 926- t922 FAX FAX 926-1323 Planning Contracc Person Phone 456_2205 Date Submitted Description initials AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNIING I / NOTICE TO PUBLIC 1l 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR 1VEEDS TO BE SIGNED , . . DCSIGN DEVIA7'ION SUBMITTED ~ ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS -LOTS ~ B4ND RELEASED - ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ' Z/ /7 c IIEARING FXAM _APPROVED 4~~MNIED- JAPPEALED ABC / PROJECT ~ r APPROVED _DENIED BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED ~ / J STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNL) STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMIIVISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) ~ w ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET REZONE FILE # ~ Related File # I: ZE-95-70 ) Date to Review t# Date to AA & DR 08/49/95 Time 2:15 Date Received 07I26/95 Project Name UR-3.5 TO Q-3 aEAUTY SALON No. Lots No.Acres 7,000S F -kange - Tawnship - Section STTE A.DDRESS S DISHMAN MICA/E BOWDLSH PARCEL # 33544-0201 Applicant's Name PAMELA S AYERS Phone 922-2007 Address 11518 E DISHMAN MICA Phane 2# SPOKANE WA 99206 FLOOD ZONE YES W _ S _ School _ Uate Conditions maited Owner Engineer / Surveyor's ! Archicecc's Add ress Address Phone Phone / Fax Planning Contact Person LOUIS WEBSTER Phone !1 456-2205 Date Submitted , Description Initials AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING F1NAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING I / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NFEDS TO BE SIGNED I DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMIT"FED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS I HEARING EXAM APFROYED DENIED- APPEALID BBC / PROIECT APPROVED DENIED BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED I 1 / STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL./SUZANNE) STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATiVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) . < /1. f4C II . r:\p\t\review.tor ~ ' A I OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 - 70NE C ANC';F - TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Steve Davenport FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard Ss-,- DATE: November 7, 1995 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS ZE-30-95 / AYERS, PAMELA S The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" of the public hearing scheduled November 7, 1995. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access pl.ans E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire pro]ect or portion thereof if the development is phased E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer E50 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court which is ad3acent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 80-0726) E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer E59 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer E60 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and • SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS: # ZE-30-95 / AYERS PAMELA S 2 successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88 050, or by requesting and autborizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the 'Lormation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88.065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree. (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated hithin the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement pr03ect is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below This provision is applicable to Dishman-Mica Road E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Dishman Mica Road as a 100 foot Principal Arterial The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 20 in width along the Dishman Mica Road frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Dishman Mica Road. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for ad3ustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPECIAL CONDITION The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards SPECIAL CONDITION: The applicant shall provide documentation that no more than 5% of the floodplain shall be covered with impervious surfaces If mare than 5% of the site is to be covered with impervious surfaces an engineering analysis mus be completed to address disposal of floodwater The analysis mus show that the infiltration of floodwater can continue to occur as it did prior to development of the site The commercial structure shall be floodproofed SPECIAL CONDITION• The aforementioned condition related to Hatherly Court road improvements will not be required provided that there is no additional square foootage added to the existing structure or that the intensity level of the proposed use is increased ~ • ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 - 70NE CHANOF'. - TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Louis Webster FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard 5<.- DATE: September 11, 1995 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # ZE-30-95 / AYERS, PAMELA S The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" of the public hearing scheduled September 21, 1995. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer E50 The County Engineer has designated a Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Dishman Mica Road which is ad3acent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 12-14 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. E50 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 80-0726) E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer E59 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. ~ • SUBDIVJ.tU.ON CONDITIQU,9,- # ZE-XX-95 / AXZRS PAMELA S 2 E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Dishman Mica Road as a 100 foot Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 20 in width along the Dishman Mica Road frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Dishman Mica Road. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPECIAL CONDITION: The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. SPECIAL CONDITION The applicant shall provide documentation though a flood study that no more than 5% of the site shall contain imprvious surface and that the commercial structure shall be floodproof. . _~p~2 ~ ~ _ - _ _ ~°•1~-~~ ° l - ~ . -6. l. - _ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - . , : ~ ~ . . ; , , _ - - ~ - ~ _ r r ~ 4 . r r S P O K A N E C O U N T Y _ OFFICE OF T~-iE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ A DNLSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMfiNT Ronald C Hormann, P E, County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P E, Uu•ector Memorandum DATE: September 18, 1995 TO: Steve Davenport, Planning , FROM: Tammie Williams, Engineers RE: ZE-30-95 r Condition 16 Contained in the "9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95" on page 45 should be changed to read: The applicant shall provide documentation that no more than 5% of the floodplain shall be covered with impeivious siufaces. If more than 5% of the site is to be covered with impervious surfaces an engineering anatysis must be completed to address disposal of floodwaters. The anatysis must show that in.fihration of floodwater can continue to occur- as rt did prior to development of the site. The commercial stiucture shall be floodproofed. 1026 W Broadway Ave • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 3243478 TDD (509) 324-3166 . DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMTTTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1995 SUBJECT: ZE-30-95; ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-7 (UR-7) TO REGIONAL BUSINESS (B-3) 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Pam Ayers East 11518 East Dishman Mica Road Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 922-2007 Contact Planner: Steve Davenport Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Dishman IViica Road, west of and adjacent to Hatherly Cucle, and approxunately 150 feet east of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman Mica Road in Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington Proposal: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone. , History: The apphcant received a Home Profession Pernut (HPE-10-93) in 1993 to operate a beaury shop on the site. A Home Profession is defined as "a profession or craft carried on witlun a residence by the occupants, which activity is clearly lncidental to the use of said residence as a dwelling and does not change the residential character of the dwelling or neighborhood, and is conducted in such a manner as to not give any outward appearance of a business in the ordinary meaning of the term." Home professions are required to comply wrth specific cntena to qualify for a home profession pernut. - II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: Approximately 6,500 square feet. B. Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located wrthin the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone T'he Urban category is intended to provide for a"citylike" envuonment with pnmanly intensive residential development 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 38 r i t 4' 1 r . LS ,;Yr ^ I ~ ~ . ~ F` ~ ~ 70 - us:Y-k P .4... ~ ~ l 9 / ~ ~ to h°/ , 4 ` ~~i ~ ~ } ° . ~ 'row.~ , ~ ~ ~•,~.sG~~ ~ cor rl~ ~ . - i 74,. - ~ -7 p CjC C~j_-.--. : , ~ J„_. ~ + 1 YL . ~ - , ~ ~ _r ~ - f ~ 01, t ~ \~r%~~ ~ ~ - ~~►~1 ~ ~ - Lc)~- ~ - ~ CO) l'''~~,` ~ 's t~ r "1~ ~ - . RPnort frN ZEw30m95 wn _ il,.._ `~m~ ater ~ 1~' ~o j ~c 1~. ~ ' ~ - - - Tat a ~ b n ~ ~ 11{V ~"y~1'\ I ~ } ~r rj ° - a ' ~ ~ i, ~ } ~ ~ ~~L` ~ h ~ ~ ' ~ ~i • T~ _ ~ ~ ffyt ` ` ~ e } t`_, 'in'aa ~i ,f ~n~.~- • ~ ` . ~trten r y ~ ~ - Aren~ a4 104 ;{;iaUCxPtati,'~f,,~+s ' N 128 : ~ , ,fi,~ • ` ~ ~ Qt 0;6_ r Avf ' i - , • . ~ Q ~ \ _I ~ • ~ ~--ylv 28 ~ ~ - -'r^ frs- i'"ns ~a R! Is _ _-s se.J:~..+'t1 c+,,,--.aru'..--+~ ` .Z W e I I n u ?oi~ ~ - - - - A ..r-~ ~ ~`4 _ ~ M_J ii aO~S~~` ~.r ''a ~ - '~l = ~ gM 199 , BM ~ i 320• _30j-;~'-- ?D: 34 2) . ` ~ lDl•i l lp~=~ ~ 331 33 J . ~ ettf' i • ~ - ~ y ;r , (`~~~sy \ • ~ . - . 't ' ' N ~ + 1 ~ { ! , , 1, t' y F~ \ - . ~ * • ~ ` ^ • . '3 t r s ~ ! ~ n jr' ~ Ji 'r! j~ ~ , ,.Ir~ 1 t'`_?0~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L'_ t.r t " • .tf r w ~f ' J ~ r ~r /~..~r ~ ~ • ,~1' . ~ fi`.'~ ~J. , ~ . .'~~f 1" ~r ' ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~1 ~ ~ ~ y~~•~~ . Q 'f . 'r ~ S~,j ~ ~ r ,f~ " ^"l j ~ 1 Y;r `%"r''~",~` L ~ ~c ,~t rs , t ~ ~ o a a ~y ~ ~ : ~ , r endv * t • : ' ' . ; ~ ` j~ • ~ Y ~ t (!f• i ~i {I f fp i~r t r~ I f. ~,Jf`%v'~~ ~+''L i ~ r • t p~~ ( 3y ~ ~ X ~ tx ' ! ~ • ~ . ~ ~ •I/? ~ ~r~:r"~a1"'``~1%`~ ~p1? ` ~ \ ~ A + r 'J a ~ i , r r!' ~ ~ " ~J .~,f'1 ~r ..rt`- ~ K ~j.'. , • Q ~ • ~ I . ` g.ti F~ fr~ ~ ~ ~ / r \/1~ +ft1t ~ Y 7 {~er~/! _ i \ ~ s ♦ Tr~'~ ~ r QaC4 ~ • ~ ' i 'J • s; ` ~fd , +t ~r~j • ' ` ~ r ' • ~ ~J Cbes L S ri i ~ •oii v0 ~f ~ r O r.. ~ e# n r ~ J Q ..y^ I~ ( ~ ~ trn, o ` • • l~ Q ~v ~ P a,, l3 .~J ffi'~''~' ~ • ~ r rV'~ ' i~ ~ ~ f~ '/r (j e t ~ f:Jf r Q f'~ r. ~~,n '~~sv 1 r c ~ ~ a N r~ o ~ ~ f • ! ? ~ ~ ~ ; , . • 1 (1 . ; ~ , , . . , r R.i.~ 1 ~ ~ + r\ • ~ . • • . 1 . • . ' yyw~~~ a ` ,.~r.~~ , ~ r ~ ~ • \ 4C$ a tf • ' 1.,1 ~ , r ~ ' t f u~ ~ J`~ r ~ . . f i ,Y I f ~ s ~ ~ ~ • Oi Jfif, ,j' ~~~;!r,.9.r ~ ~r~~ I ~ L • • . . ~ rt • , . , - ~f r' f~ r ~ ' ~ • • 1✓~-~./ O f ~N` j r,, }~tEII~ _i r ' ~r* 'r ~ nr' ~ • • ~ ~ , . • • , ~00~~, < < ~~r~R~~ w~.~ a,r ~..f ~r i f ` . r i ` ~ ~ • • _ Z /r s• _ ~t M , t p' ~ ~ ~ q. l1 • • T f , ` } ~ J1 ~ ) ~ ~ ~ . / ~ ~I{t. . . • ~~~'.~.~'I 7,/' c1 D _ µt. : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ i} '~J y y; fiyl~.,~' ( ~ r~ ~ ~ F Pff . , ; J,~' Z l_:'~ r ►1 , ~ ~.,i+ ~ ' ~ ~ J ~ ~ • {n. ` y~ f ( _.ri }~F Sw. N ~F ~ ^ ,s j J 1/f~ J V > > J1 ~ ~ y' r ~ ~ ~ • ~ , ~ i'~~, ~ ",v • ~ ,i ~ _ r' L~ ~/y~ yi J 4J 1' 1r ' ' ~`~t 'N ~ f~~~ ~,r' ,;r'~'` fF • tYu 1+V N'` Q i ~ 1 ry, i ~ l s 1f . Il 4 Wr a3. • ; ~ / r ~ 10 1 j , ~ _ If ; ~ ,►~,~BYf ' ~ f ~ J' ~r r • << s~ i j' • . , 1 ! ~ Q~ • lr ~ j r' f ~ f f I 1' ~ r~ ~}~'ti ,~r t ; " ~ 7 S .~1 f y t ~ tr- ' ~ ~ ,r . ~r ~ f ~ , ~ r~ z~ ~'1 'rY r d'~ :r 'r~.~ ~r:y'~t, ~ fl.~j ~ J ~ Page 36 t 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-9 • t"~~ i ~ ~ ••4A ~ • , r , ~ r 00 ~ '~~11~ • ~,.,~t ' 1t , 1~ `-~~--....a~ 4 r04 1 ~ r~ " ~ 2g - r,- • - ~s~ `+a" ~ ~ ~~•ii ~'1~1 ~ ' • T 1 ' " . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ p ~ .~T r $ A' ~'i,Aq s" r t '4`;'=,~.~ 't ~ . * n ~ ~ ~ r a r' ~ y t~„-,.. _,q4,,, ` - i 4 • ~ ~,~..~,t „ `~y ~ r . ~ t ~ ~h ~ t _ ~ . . 34 ~ 3 ~ lA ~ ~ n _ - 3A_ `"--looo--~ ^ ~ ~ • ~s' I° . . ` r.,.~ Q ~ ' • 33 ~ oP a . 33 ,N, 1 ~ c ° Y ~ ' _ _ _ ~ 1 ' • SA w ` ; • --•-8'"' ~ ~l ~ ~ , a~ s n , j ~ Ji!! • C ~•'DQ,O,,,~ = pIo ~ ! ( r ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~1 ae ~ T 3~j ~ ~ ` ` f t ~ t`, t • ~ ~ : Y ~ r r ! '~j o 1 • ' t )1 / ~ J ° r~~ Fi • ~ Jr I ~ ~ ? ~ 1 . ~ ~ 1 , • , IL3 e ~ ' ~ ~ , • t ..J-^"'$s t/ ~ ~~c'°`+O I~y ~ / N j ~ _ ' ~ ~ • ( ~ t i 1 ~ r ~ ~ 1 % ' ~ ~ a = ti. ! ~ V ~ I f`~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ . • • ~ , ~ i ~f!',' . • • a . o~, o ~ , ` ~ ! , < r ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~R. ~ r~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ O • • • M • I / l-, K I ' Q~ 4 . "a* j014' ` 't, I i ~ ~ - ~ _ , • ~ rN t%a r , ` } ~ . ~ ~ ~ . a \ ~ ` ~ 7~ ~ • 1 ti , o ` t. • ` , ~ ~ J'~' 1 ° 4 ~ - - ` ! . 5 `1~ ~ • • • • _ ~ ~ \ ° ''f`"~~.,'`~ ~ y; > - ~ . `''y ~ , ~ • Jn { , i ~ d/ ~ r' ~ ' r . . / f `r ~ J/ r\ ' I ~ : r ` ~ ` : ` l ` ' 1 ` I c .o r,,_-' 35 ~ ~ jr 1,,~. c i f ~ • ~3 tr,r~ ~ . ~ page ~ ! \ 1f . , ~ St~ Repf or 9195 H~ i~ ZE=30=95 ~ . • . , , • . - r -a i ~ : y - - . ~ .i.'` • • • I = 7 2 d LENO[. 30th • Av e - 2, ~f .F34-. . • . ~ o ~ W 31 s t ~ :2 WI.' LL Ave ~~E p- 2~ ~ . : d . _ • - ~ : . . . . . : . . . 3 ~-T-., . - . . . . . . . _j ~ 31 S~ ~ • ~ ~ ' ~ Q a B ` ~ ~ . 0 32 nd a Ave J) 3 CL . • • • •Ao • L1 •~~Y~0• • • 0. .10 0. 00 tooi i~~ ~~0~00~000*0*•80~i •~~~~~i i •0i~0 0 0~ p ~ • ~33 2ra~'~vE ~ 3''S 12r~ /~v6 sk ' Y: ~c~~: . ~ . •.......-1 ~ ~ ~ J • R-2 1 . , 4. ~ •v . . ~'G • ?y \ ~r.,, t 3 4 T 1-a ~ • ,~v E ' o~. , . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . _ \ ' ~ ~ ~ 34TH . ..•.~At.pr.• ' • d~~ • . . 2 • ' 35T" AVe • d ' ~ ~ ~ r ~ • r ' , ~1' ,c ~ 'J \ . ~ 2 ,n~. . . . c 2 • W ~ • : JJ- IJULl~ D • 'r 3c~'t~ p, Q> 4LoKn ~,o r -d6-•~ ~ • . . ~ ~ 0 : P .o I Gg-C • ~ 35TN, G~' GT tn i ~ V, ~ ; G 3co -r k /1v E h - \ . . . - • • ~ uR • . o UR~3 . . . . . . a~ ~ 0 • TH i •,~w . . 3'7TH p AVE ~ 6r J , . -`r~.••-'• ' • • ~ ~ ~ C . ~ ; W' - - Q • • . ~ . O •3~T~ '~\C• ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ` .ti~ , o N - 40 TH --t~_ t . , Bm3 , . . ~ ~4L~ '0 p~ W 6 I W I 3 C ' ' URatIS ~ { a Q f'~ ~ OR Q Q 9 44-fN \ \ r--J r- J ~ 'J r - - m3 ~ = i ~ ~i •.d~ ~ _ ~ ` ) _ ~ • - T - RD ~„M ~ i • ~ z " 04EST52 ~ \ . T E+„5 P, ~ _ t G J ~ fi LOSUQ.E A E N . 1. . . . . . - ~ _ ~ • u._~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ u • • • • • i • ~ •,~,L, • ~~i . ~ ~ ~'1 ~ ~ !t • r {`7 - ~ U ~ tr S i ~ THO PE 2= V;1 - Q e d, w u 3 / . 4(oru Ave 0 M: . . • W p ' ~ ' r ~ ~i :2 ~ a UR s5 ` Q ~t ~ , • < , ~ u ^ ' t cr- 47TN , ~v 6 ~ % j~ ~ ~ LLi a 7 TH r 1 ~ ••II~I/ r~ ~ ~ ~ ^ _ , a s~ ~ T ~ . f ' ~ ~ , , Z ~ } 40 7N ; O ~ , • e ~ 3 o~w / FERRET i(.A.. :•...•....~•.e. ~ , . ~ - ~ i'. • ~ i ~ ) J 4r ~ .r t l ~ I •-•~~°.R~ .a~Q • ~ , . J 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 34 ZE=30=95 * ~ . , I _ ~ J ~,1 2 ~ ~ r - . ~-1~. _ 30th Ave ~ : ~ ::~r_.l j - . .i'~~. W . ~•~•~•`••';'r~~•,~~• ; k' ~ • V ~ ~ ~ . . . _ • . . . ~ ~f ' • ~ L) O l1! 0. ~ / • . ~ ~ ~ • . . ~ o : ~ 31 st • :2 W Ave ~ • 3 3~. , n,ve -j ; --t; • • • :~'•~•'~'.Tr1 ~ ~ . ..-.-.•ap ~ 1 T ,C 0.0 ~ . CL 2 • , 32nd Ave 0) ' : ' ~ . . . ~ 3 ~ : . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . , • ~ ~~3321'~•, ~'~VE R.17 &V6 ~~t ~ . . • • ; ~ ; . • . . . . ~ • ~'1..._! ' , t -1 'S 4 T N : • ; ~ve~. ~ . , ; : . •,i►~ ~ : . • : .lSS~.'f~: . , : ' . . m ~ • -64 T H ~ d., 2• 3STH AVe- I C c~ _ _..C I . ~ , 2 ~ , J i , r----- - z ' O ~ , C , J ' J • laU1..A /~LONA tO 1}~ } I) Q> . • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . • ; . G7 . O ~ . , _ . • ' ~ i ' ~ ~ - ~ i 35TH, GT. . . . ' • . • I 3CoT~-t . AVE ' ~ • r ~ !Siy i .?a ..-.2L- ~ ~ s • -47.~,~, ~ 3, TtA ~ : ~ 3 ~ ^ n N ~ . . . a ' ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ ~~4 J f .i , z ? > 8 . ~ . • . ~ . . • Z • • • d - - i ~ ~ ~ s • 3bTs ; N~ Q • f CL ~ • ~ . ~ A ~ ~T - - - 20 ~ ~ ~ 1 . • , ~ • ~ r ZO } • ~ . . ~ ~ I ` t , • \ ~ 42 ~ W 4 V C ♦ m w Z I~~ ca! 2 ! ~ q, ~ . , . 0 ~ ~ ST ..1 s L~ ~ . ? C. ~ ~ 4gTH I r-J r o' rj N • 4?n Cl ^ • . " ~ ~ ~ Q ~ • : r•.''° q~ r - - - - - - - ~ I CHESTtQ- r .TEMP 1 ~ . ~ j GL09UQ.E ~ ~ J . ~ E N ~c~, ' • I : ~ . • • • : • •:,1: ~ _ - . ~ J- ~ _ , V ~ ' •,I TNO PE 2cm ~ ~ ~ L• ' u, U ~ • . G(oTU AV E (X ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ : - W ~ . O t Z • ; ' a 3 Z • . d` • • ~ , (n ~ 4/ 1 N /\V 6 aTt~+ ~iv9 ~ ~'y i ' y • ` ~ - imx s,, T ~ . • ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 6. ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 48 z T M ~ ^ . f ' . 1 k11ET C ~ W'~►'+~' -~'i' ~ J - O ~'1' ~ ~ r~ • G! ~ y~ • ~ :2 . ^!pr ~F Q~'~ • ' 1 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 33 . . ~ . . .i ~.Major commercial uses are considered noncompatible within the Urban category. T'he proposed rezone to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the . Comprehensive Plan. The detailed definition for the Urban category specif'ically identifies major commercial uses as noncompatible The Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most intensive commercial zone and is used to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan 2. Arterial Road Plan: The site is adjacent to Dishman Mica Road which is identified as a Pruicipal Arterial with a future nght of way width of 100 feet In order to unplement the Artenal Road Plan, the Counry Engmeer has requested that a stnp of property 20 feet in width along Dishman Niica Road be set aside as a Future Acquisitron Area (FAA) _ C. Site Characteristics: The site is a relatively flat residential lot with an emsting home that is currently being used as a beauty salon. A gravel lot to the north and east of the house provides parking D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The site is located in a manufactured home subdivision with 341ots. Other uses in the area include some commercial uses adjacent to Dishman Mlca Road and single fanuly residential neighborhoods E . Zoning Analysis Proposal: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) estabhshed in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70). North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural (A) (12-67). South. Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) established in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70). East• Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) estabhshed in 1991, previously designated as Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) (95-70) West: Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991, previously zoned Commercial (C) (36-82C). Zoning within the vicuuty of the intersection of Bowdish Road and Dishman Mlca Road has included past approvals for business uses. Pnor to Spokane County adopting the Comprehensive Plan in 1980, three commercial rezones had been approved In 1952 an area at the northwest corner of Bowdish and Dishman Niica was rezoned from Agncultural to Commercial (ZE-79-52) In 1967 the area directly west of the proposal was rezoned from Agncultural to Loca1 Business, and in 1977 the azea at the southwest corner of Bowdish and Dishman Niica was rezoned from Agricultural to Local Business (ZE-105-77C). Since the adoption of Spokane County's Comprehensive Plan, two additional business zones have been approved. The Local Business zone directly east of the proposal was rezoned to Commercial (ZE-36-82C) in 1982, and an area south of Dishman 1Vbca and East of Bowdish Road was rezoned from Urban Residential-3.5 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 39 w to Regional Business (ZE-21-93C) in 1993. See the attached zoning map for current zone designations wluch were unplemented with the adoption of the Spokane County Zoning Code in 1991. F. Land Use Analysis: The proposal is witlun the unincorporated community of Chester which includes residential uses and established commercial uses to serve the area Commercial uses are located along the north and south side of Dishman Mica Road. Most residential use is located in areas further north or south from Dishman Niica Road, although some existing single family residences and a manufactured home are located along Dishman N11ca. . Site. One single-fanuly residence and beaury salon. North• Vacant. South: Single fanuly residence East Single family residence West: Gas station G. Circulation. Dishman 1Vbca Road and Hatherly Circle will provide direct access to the site H. Design: Proposed Site Plan: The site plan as subnutted does not comply with the minimum development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone. Compliance can not be attained because the site size of 6,500 ft does not provide an adequate area to meet the rrununum requuements for parking, landscapulg and setbacks. The existuig use, wluch requires the owner to hve on-site and lunits the extent of the business, is pernutted through a home profession pernut. Any redevelopment or expansion would llkely not be pemutted due to site constraints Development Standards: Pronosed Reauued Lot Area 6,500 sq. ft. No nununum Building Coverage 13% 60% maacimum Building Height not specified 35 ft. maximum Parking 3 8 rrunimum Setbacks Front Yard Dlshman 1Vbca Road 0 feet 35 ft. Flanking Street Yard Hatherly Circle 20 feet 40 ft. from lot line Side yard (south) 16 feet 15 feet Rear yard (west) 32 feet 15 feet Note: Front yard setback measured from Future Acquisition Area (FAA). 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 40 ~ > Proposed Buffering/Landscaping Techniques• The proposed site plan does not illustrate sufficient landscaping to meet the muumum requuements specified by Chapter 14.806 (Landscaping and Screening Standards) of the Zorung Code. Chapter 14.806 would require 20 feet of Type I landscaping along the south property line and five feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to Dishman 11bca Road and Hatherly Cucle. c Other Site Plan Considerations The site plan submitted for review by the Heaznng Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to detemune comphance with all Code regulations and condltions of approval is recommended to be admuustrative and to occur at the Building Pernut stage. - I. Drainage: -A-dr-ainnage-;plan is reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development. J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements None illustrated. Any recorded or requued easements will be disclosed during the building pernut process. K. Water Supply: The proposal is witlun the Chester Waterworks Water Dlstnct L. Sewage Disposal. Sewage disposal will be accomplished by an on-site system as authonzed by the County Health Distnct Double plumbing for new construction is requued by the County Utilities Department to facilitate connection to a future sewer system. M. School The proposal is in the Central Valley School Disti-ict No. 356. The School Distnct dld not respond to the proposal. N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1 The Fire District and - the Division of Buildings Department (Fue Marshall) are requued to approve fire protection provlsions prior to issuance of building pernuts. 0. Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on site P. Cultural Resources: None have been identified Q. Flood Hazard Areao _The County F.ngineer has deternuned that the proposal is situated partially or wholly within a 100 year flood hazard area The apphcant is required to obtain a floodplain development pernut pnor to any development on the site. The requirements for tlus area are that no more than 5% of the floodplain can be covered with impervious surfaces and the lowest floor, including subgrade floors be at or above the flood level elevation for that area, or the structure need to be flood proofed to that elevation R Critical Areas• None identified 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30 -95 - i_ - Page 41 . ~ , , . III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checkllst was subnutted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines The Planning Department has deternuned that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Deternunation of Nonsigruficance ("DNS") The "DNS" was cuculated to 13 other agencies of junsdiction and other agencies/ departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends September 19, 1995 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the pLapos~;-and-by notice an a sign pas~ed=~"thtTroposal site The Heanng Exarruner may-- consider additional envuonmental related testimony at the pubhc heanng I V. DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY The proposed Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) is not consistent with the Urban category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan The Plan states that major commercial uses are noncompatible in Urban category In addition to being inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the site lacks adequate land area to comply with many of the development standards of the Regional Business (B-3) zone and is located in a flood hazard area wluch poses sigruficant obstacles to development for commercial purposes The potential for stnp commercial development along the Dishman 1Vhca corridor would increase with approval of additional commercial use zones V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. i i. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property: Lot l, Block 1, Hatherly's Subdivision, according to plat recorded in Volume 7 of Plats, Page 71, Spokane County, Washington - SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) and Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay (ASA) Zones, as amended 2. The appllcant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heanng Body Vanations, when approved by the Planning Director/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not hrruted to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must 9/95 HEC Staff Report far ZE-30-95 - Page 42 conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zorung Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 3 Approval is required by the Planning Director/deslgnee of a specific hghti.ng and sigtung • plan for the described property prior to the release of any bullding pemuts 4. Direct hght from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. A specif'ic landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planrung Duector/designee shall be subnutted with a performance bond for the project - prior to release of building pernuts. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that - - sight dsstance at access points is not obscured or impaired - j - : 6 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane C6uffty Audztor a Title Notice notrng that the property in question is subject to a variery of special conditions unposed as a result of approval of a land use action. Tlus Title Notice shall serve - as public notice of the conditrons of approval affecting the property in question The Title - Notice should be recorded withun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Build.ing and Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows. The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Of~icial on [ imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ) is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 7 The Division of Building and Planrung shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal from the final dssposition, including lapsing • of appeal penod, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows• "Prior to the issuance of any building pernut for any bullding or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly descnbed as follows: " 8 The Spokane Counry Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record wrth the Counry Audrtor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road ' nght=of-way and utilities The reserved future acquisition area Tit1e Notice'shall be - ` released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planrung. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following a At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utihties along Dishman IV&ca Road b. Future building and other setbacks requued by the Spokane County Zorung Code shall be measured from the reserved future acqulsition area. c No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utilities If - 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 43 - ♦ . .1 ' any of the above improvements are made within tlus area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be pnvate property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, park.ing, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses e The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "intenm" unprovements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquinng said future acquisition area 9 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buslding and Planrung at the earliest possible _ stage iTi-arcWr ta be informed of code requirements adrrurustered/enforced as authonzed by= the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, ~'ire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, extenor wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note. The Department of Buildings reserves the nght to confirm the actual address at the time of building pernut.) SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Pnor To Issuance Of A Building Pernut Or Use Of The Property As Proposed 1 Access pernuts for approaches to the Counry Road System shall be obtatned from the County Engineer 2 The apphcant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 3. The applicant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the . Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the development is to be phased 4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be subnutted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of park.ing stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineerulg practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by_the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. ~ 5. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. al Arterial Road~w c io~for he The ~ement unty Engineer has designated a PrinciP ~a~'S~'~ of Dishman N1ica Road wluch i djaeelff' o~the proposed development. Tlus will r uire-the addition of appr~ ately 12 to 14 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the developm t--...T.he_ construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 7 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court wluch is ad~acent to the proposed development This 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 44 - ~ v •a. T. will reqLUre the addltion of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed. 8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washulgton Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction and other apphcable County standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaitung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requuements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 95-0498 as amended and are apphcable to this proposal 10. The regulations of the National Flood Insur~ceaRrogmil-sWwjhe - proposed plat is affected by a flood hazard zone A development pernut shall be obtauled from the County Engineer before construction or development- begins withul any azea of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance No. 80-0726) ~ 11. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public nght- of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work witlun the public road nght-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12. All required construction within the existing or proposed public nght-of-way is to be completed pnor to the release of a building pernut, or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of unprovements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13. The Counry Artenal Road Plan identifies Dishman 1VUca Road as a Principal Arterial. ~ The existing nght-of-way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the M Plan In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, in addition to the reqLUred nght-of- way dedication, a stnp of property 20 feet in width along the Dishman 1V1ica frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquued by Spokane County at the tune when artenal unprovements are made to Dishman Mica Road I 14. The apphcant should be advised that there may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition Spokane Counry assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utlhty purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to_deternune whether " apphcant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or "relocation costs~and to make arrangements for any necessary work 15 The applicant shall grant apphcable border easements adjacent to Spokane County nght of way per Spokane County Standards. 16. The applicant shall provide documentation through a flood study that no more than 5% of the site shall contain impervious surface and that the commercial structure sha11 be floodproof. el ~ 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 45 ~ r. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1 A covenant agreement shall be signed stating. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place theu name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signuig of a protest petitAon agaulst the fornaation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 wluch includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water system Plan for Spokane Counxy,as-.mende&= _ y 3. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Re,solution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authonzation is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health DistrYCt and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of pernuts by the Health District. 4 Each new urut shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide collection systems SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane Counry Health Distnct prior to the issuance of any on-site sewage disposal permit or builcLng pernut for this project. 2 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utihties, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health 5. Subject to specific apphcation approval and issuance of permts by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal s~-stt_mfnay lvalathorYZed Note. Due to the small size of the lot, the hquid waste coordinator shall be contacted to establish maximum daily flow rates for the parcel. 6. Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited 9/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-30-95 Page 46 - ~ # ~ ti ~rlETERMINATIU~ OF NUNSIGNTFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) ~ECF., sPo~ ENVIRoNMENrAL ORDINANcE FILE NUMBER(S) ZEa30-95 st~1 ~.~~~eel ~ DESCRIPTION OF PROFOSAL: Zane Fteclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regianal Busrness (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business {B-3} ,zone AFPLICANT: Parnela S Ayers 11518 East Dishrran-Mica Road 5poka,ne, WA 99206 (509) 922-2007 LOCATI[]N OF PROFf]5AL Generally located at the southwest cvrner of t1ne int~~section of Dishmarn-M-ica Road and Hatherly Circle in the SE 114 of Section 33, Townshup 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Wasla.ngton LEAD A.GEINCY: SFOK4NE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILi]IlNCr AND PLANNINCi DET'ERNHNATYON The lead agency for thus proposal has deterrrined that it does not have F a probable significant adverse ungact on the envuonrnent An Environmental Irrtpact Statement ` (EIS) is nat requued under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Thus decisson was rrrade after review af a compYeted envi-ronrnental ch~cklisC and other inforrnation on frle utrt.h the lead agenc}r. Ttus uifornrtatian is avadable ta the public on request Tlvs I]NS is issued under WAC I97-11-340(2), the lead agency wil1 not act on ttus proposal for at least 15 days fram the date issued (below) Cornmedts regarding this DNS must be submitted na later than 4:00 p.m., Segtemher 19, 1995, if they are intended . to alter the DNS. v ' RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL JANiES L MANSOIV, DIRECTOR By Steve T3avenport, Planner Phone: (509) 456-2205 Address: Spokane County Division af Building and Plannmg West 1026 Broadvaay Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSLTED. 1995 SIGNATUR ;JIIEILCIONE C:D~S R~~G F~.'I`AL C7QN~NS AT TBE FMARING ~•~###-W.################# ####################-######iiq## APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATIQN, after it becomes fina1, rnay be rnade to the SPC]KANE ~OUNTY DIVISION OF BUTLDING AND PY.ANNING, 2nd Floar, West 1026 Braadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appea.l deadllne 1s the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the szgning of the decisian to approve or d-isapprove the project. This appeal rnust be wntten and the appellanz shou.ld be prepared ta make specific factual objeetions ConCact the Division of Flanung to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal #41-#~####1#111P######~#####~ TYa.ts DNS was mai1ed to 1 VVA State Department of EcologY (Olympla) 2. WA State Iepartment of Health 3 Spokane Caunty Health Distnct 4. Spokane County I]lvlsion of Engincenng 5 Spokane County Air Polluxlon Control Authont}r 6. Spokane County Parks Department 7 Spokane Connty Boundary Review Board 8 Spokane Regional Txanspartation Council 9 WA St.ate TJepartment af Transportazion 10 Spokane Transit Authonty 11 Central'Val1ey School Distnct 12 Chester Waterworks 13 Fire District No 1 J W ' I ♦ ~i I IAVIRDTJM IT A A TT"-~- 0!!~'T SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11,10.230 ! 11 ; - SPOKAKf ENVIROIQifNTAI ORDINIUICE (VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11 10 230(1) ~ . Envirormiental Checkiist File No Purpose of Checkllst The State Enviro mrcnta) Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental inpacts of a vroposal before iaaking Aecisions An Environmental lmpect Stater.+ent (EiS) rnust be prepareE for all proposals with probable 5ignificant adverse fmpacts on tAe quality of the enviromient The purpose of this checkltst is to provide information to helo you and the agency identlfy lmpacts fron your proposal (and to reduce or avoid inpacts from the proposal, if it tan be Eane) and to help the agency declde vhether an EIS is required [nstructions for Applicants This environaental checklist asks you to describe sowe baslc Infortaation about your proposal Goverrxaental agencies use thSs checklist to determine rhetAer the environoental impacts of your praposa) are siqnificant, requiring preparatlon of an EIS Ansrer the questions briefly, with the most precise inforaation knarn. or glve the best description y(xu can You nust answer each Question accurately and carefully, to the Cest of your knowledge In most cases. you should be abie to answer the questions froa your own observations or project plans without the need to hire exoerts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question Cces not appiy to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not apply ' Canplete answers to the qw Sttons nav may avotd unneCessary delays later Sone Questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and lanCmark designetions Answer these Questions if you can If you have probleas. the govermental agenctes can assist you the checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do thern over a perfod of tlme or on different parcels of iand Attach enr additional lnfonmatton that will descriDe your proposal or tts environnental effects The agency to rhlch you submlt this checklist may ask you to explaln your answers or provide addlttonal infa naatton reasonably related to deterealntng 1f there may be significant adverse fmpact Use of cAeck 1 f st for nonpro,}ect prcpou) s Lamplete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though QuestSons raay be answered 'Oces not aooly' iN ADOITION. caAplete the SUPVLfMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D) For nonproject actions, the referertces in the Checkltst to the words 'project.' 'appltcant.' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proDOSaI," 'proposer.' and 'affected geographic area.' respectlvely A BACKGROUt10 O CJ 1 Yawe of proposcd project. 1 apPlicaDle . ~l 2 Name of App 1icant 3 Address nd phone nueber of applicant or contsCt person or) DO ~ ~.;1 't ' 7 4 Date checklist prepared f7 " Lo 5 Agency requesting checklist PI A 7 ' t: 6 Proposed ttaing or zchedule (includtng phasing. if appllcaDle) ~ . ~ 7 a Do you have any plans for future addttions, ezpansion, or further activity relateE to or comected rith this Droposal' !f yes, explain b Oo you ow+ or have opttons on land neerby or adjacent to this proposal' 1f yes. explain ~ ~ 8 List any environtntal inforcnation you knor aDout that has bxn prepered, or rill De prepareE, direcily relateE to this proposai Rev.2/1/88 ~ z ~ , 9POKATIE EflVIROHl~NfAL ORDINAftCE (uAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11..10 230(1) ~ - ~ ~ k 9AC1CG8008D (con[lnued) • ~ , . 9 Do yw tc+ov vhecher applieacions are peoding for govermental epprovele of ocher proposals direccly affecting the propercy coveced by your pzoposal' If yes, ezplaln 10 Liac any governmeoc apyrovsla or pessite thac vill be needed for your proposal. lmovn ~ 11 Cive e brief, complece descripciort of your propowl, including the proposed use• and the •ise of the projecc end eite -here are sevecal yuestions Lcec la thie cheetilist tfiac ssk you to describe cercain aspects of qour propossl Y w do not need to repeat choee aoever5 on this page ~1 1 ' 4t~e_d ~ 1 ~ ~ l_ ` ,L - ~ 7 C) 0- C'') 1; tocatlan of the pro9oeal Ctve sufficLent infotteation for i person co undecscand the preclee location of vour propoeed pro , lncludinr, a acreet addreee, if any, end section, tovnshlp •nd renge, Lf knovn I[ a Droposal vould occut over a range of srea, prov e che ranp,e or boundartee ot the eite(@) ProvlAe a legal descrlptlon, si[e plan, ricinlty msp, and topographic map, 1.` rensonebly available uhlle you ahould suhmit aay plans required b7r the •geney, yw are aot required to du9licate naps or decalled pleni euholcced vLth eny permlt appilcatton relaced to thls checklisc ~ ~ L4 ,5A1 ~ . . ~ Urt 1 . L Al . f . Aozt. ~ f 0 I ~ &NIJ I X_ff I . , r 13 Dces the propoeed accion ile vi[hln the AQuifer Seroitive Aru (ASA)' ':he Cener Sever Secvice Aree' -he Priorlty Sewer Service Aree' 'he Ctty ot Spokane' (See Spokane Couoty's ASA Overlay 2one At L• for boundarles) ro se caWLETEn et A"LtCAarr 8 P.NVIR017MER"..AL E1.EKYfS Evaluatton For Agency Loe Only 1 EAP'Sl a Genecal Qescription of the elce (ciTCle one) G rolling, hilly, sreep slopee, oourttslnoua, other b 'fi aC ie the eteepeet slope on the eice (appro:lmate peccent •lope)' ~ v c 'Jhac general typea of soile are found on the slce (for eumple, clay, sand, gravel, peac, ouck)' if you knov the claasLflcatlon ot agcleuitural soile, speclfy thea end aote •ey priae fsea L nd - l , / d Are chere surface iadications or hietorq of unetsble eolle in the lmoediate vicinicq' If eo, describe 2 , SPOKAttE ENVIROlIKENTJII OROINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11- 10 230(1) ~ B ENVIROfMENTAI ELEHENTS(continued) ~ ' Evaluatton For Agency Use Only e Describe the purpose, type, and approzimate quantities of any fi111ng or grading proposed Indicate.source of ffll _ ~ . ~ F ~ ~.i ~ l ~ r , . f Couid rosio ~ur as a result of clearing, constructton. o use' If so. generally GescrlDe I~ It~ TX 9 About hat pertent of the site will be covered with impervlous surfates after project construc- tion (~r exa le.~asDhalt or Dulldings)' , l~{._.~ti (1f' I'1 Q . h Proposed easures to reduce or tontrol erosion. or othtr impacts to the earth, 1f any 2 AiR a What type of enissions to the elr would result frao tAe proposai (i e. dust, autanobile, odors industrial, wood Smoke) Curing Construttlon anC when the projeCt 1S toapleted7 lf any. gengrally describe and giv4 ap~roximate qua Lttes 1f known 3 ;`'l . i( ' ~ b Are there any off-stte sourtes of emisslons or odor that may affeCt your proposal' If so, generally escribe a vx ry- (T Lk / G ! r'~11"'/"✓~`~`7~ (/6{ /-~l c Proposed measures to reduce or cont 1 emissians or other fmpacts td air, If any ~ r l ~ s 3 WATER a Surface (1) IS there any surface water body on or in the immedlate vicinity of the zlte inciuding year- round and seasonal streams. snltwater. lakes, ponds, wetlands)' !f yes. describe type and provide names lf appr,o)riate. state what stream or river ft flows into (2) Will the profect require any rork over, in, or adjacent to (Mithin 200 feet) the described waters7 If yes, please describe ppd attach available plans 3 ~ SPQIAt2E-ENVIROIQGNtAL OHDIHARCE ~ ('aAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11~10 230(1) " b CNVIRORlMN'tAL EI.EM.'N:5 (coatinued) ~ ~ ' Evaluation For Agency Use Only (J) Eatimate the esount of fill and dredge naterial that wuld be placed in or removed from the surface vacer or vetlands and indiute the area of the site ttut vauld be affeeted indience the •ource of fill oaterial .,t ~ (4) 4111 the proposal ceQuire surfaca water vithdravale or diverslons$ Give • general descrlp- cion, purpose, and appro:3aaCe Quantities, i[ kn ~-.-'~1C °l"-l (S) Does the pro lie vithin a 100-ya r tlaod plaint If •o, note lou c3on on cl►e siu plaa ~ A QY _ c-, n, ~ ~l ~~►mm~. ~ - n ~~~r,~. ~ Doe• the proposal involve any disclurgee of vute ~ceri• co surfaee vater•, If •o, ~r deecribe the type of vaste #-td antlcipated wolum of diseturge D Ground (1) Will groundvater be vithdravn, or vill vater be diacharssd to groundvater' Give genecal deecripcion, purpose, aed appro:imate Q wnt3,~les. !f Imovn (2) Describe vnste aaterlal that vill be discfiarged lnto the grouad trom sepcic tanks or other ueitary vaate treataent facility Describe the general •!se of the rrstem, the o►emDer of houoea co be •erved (if applicsble) or the numEer o[ peraona the systea(s) •re expecced to eerve, ~ e--c c` . , ~Ca , (3)~ Describe any systems, ocher thsa Ahose desigeed for the Aispow 1 of sanitary wu ce. inscalled for the purpose of dlacharglag fluid• belov the gr wod •urisce (include• •ysteas such eo thoee for the Aispoul of storo vocer or draioage frm floor drains) DescTibe the cype o[ syotem, the aeount of oaterial to De disposed of ChsouSA the •ystes and the types of materials likely co be dieposed of (ineludiag noterial• vhich say eoter the syst m inadvertaatlq chrough ipilla or a• a rqsult of firefigAtina •c[ivities) . , t (G) Will any chmical• (especially organic solvent• or petroleua fuels) be stored in above- ground or dergrouad •[orage caniu7 Ii so, vhat cypes •ad Quantities of mterials vill be stored'7 ~ 1.91~ '1/n S /Z~. ~ ~ ~i 4 , - 9P01U►NL EA9I80PIQN2AL OEDINA2tCE ` (HAL 197-11-960) Seecion 11 10 230(1) • ' A~ H EPVIROHIiE1R'AI. E1.IIMEttTS (continued) Evaluatioa Yor Agency Use Only (5) What proteetive meesuree will be taken to insute that lealu or spills of any chemlcala scoted or uned on aice will not be alloved to percolate to grwadvater (thie inelude• eeasuree to keep chemieals w c of dispossl eyecene described in 3b(2) •nd 3b(9)' - -oa c Wster Runoff (lacluding stoce¢ vacet) (1) Destribe the source of cunoff (ineludiag •cors vater) acd sethod of colleetion and disposal If any (include Quantities, lf kaovn) WAere will thls voter flov' W111 chls voter flov into ot r iwaers' 2f so, desctiDe C. ~ ' ' C) d rLcj ~ l t ~ ( . ` ' l C`. ~ ~ l' ~ ~ r' 1►'~; 1 ~ i'1- l ' ~ ~ tl (~.rc (2) Jill sny chenieals be •cored, handled or wed on tAe sice !a a loucioa vhere aspill or leaY will drain co •urfaee or groundracer or co astoro vecer disposal •ysts diseharging co eurface or groundwater' (3) Could vaece mcer 1• encer ground or sucface water@? If •o, generslly descriDe l - ✓ d Proposed measureo co reduce oT contcol •urtaee, gtound, and cunoff vater ispacta. Lf any (it c che proposed actlon lies vithin the /Wu1fer Sensitive Aru Ee •sptcially claar on 43rylanacioos r rslec2~pg to faciliciss^c incecning Secclons 7D(4). )D(S). •od 3c(2) of this eheeklist) j t' ~ ;i~ 1 n I 1 : C--~ 1 `G ~ ' C ( ~ ~ 1 C C~ ( ~ i ~ I~' ( "C ~ ( L t . t_ I 4 PLA.VTS ~ , a rheck or circle type of vegetation found on ths aite f( ~A~ . \ declduoua tree alder, mmple, aopen, ocher , i ~ evergreen tree fir, cedar, plne, ocher ,N shrvba , 1 ( g rame - i pasture erop or grain ..ec •oil planti, cattail, buttercup. Dullruih. skuak cabbage. other water plants racer 1111y. enlgrass, ailfoll, otM r other type• of vegetation b V1►at kind ead uounc of vegetacion will be reaoved oc altered' c Llet [hreatened or endanjered speciee lmorn [o be on or near the slte ! • d Proposed landscaping, use of oatlve p Lnts. or other oeaiures to pTEaEtVe or enhance vegetation on ihe eice, if,any ►A 5 SPOKANE•EKVIRONMfNTAI OROINANLE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 '1Q 230(1) ' B ENVIROPMENTAL ELEHENTS (tontinued) ~ ~ • Evaluatton For Agency Use Only 5 ANIMALS ~ a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or nenr the site or are known to be on or near the site birds hawk, heron. eagl . st ongDirds; other mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, otl+er fish bass, salraon, trout, herring. shellfish. other other b list any threateneC or 'ndanqerM species knwn to be on or neer the site c Is the site part of a migration route7 If so, explatn d ,~o(,~.osed neasures to ireserve enhance wildllfe, if any r . c, C'_X7 ~ 5 ENEaGr AND vaTUaaL RESOUR[ES a 4hat kinds of energy (electric. nacural qas. +wood stove, solar) wtil be used to aket the the completed project's energy nee0z' OesCribe rhether 1t r111 be used for heating, rnanufac- turing, ett A 4tould your project affect the potential use of Solar energy by acU atent propertles' if so. generally describe } ~ _J , c Vhat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal' list other proposed rneasures to reduce or control energy laqact5. if any 4 ~ 1 ENYIRONMENTAL HEALTH a Are there any envtronmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic cnNoicals, risk'of fire ~`/f and explosion. spfll, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposai if so. describe y ~ d' f (1) Oescribe specia) en+ergency services that might be required 6 " SP'OTANL LHVIBOtMERLL OIDIPANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1) 8. L`tVIRONlERfAL LI.I41tT5 (concinued) ~ ~ ' ~ • Evalua[lon Por V:VIROlME2T:'AL HEAL:H (concinued) Ageccy uae Only (2) Proposed measures to teduce or control eovironssental haalth hasards. if any b Noloe (1) Whac typea of noise ezist in the arna vhieh uty affeet your psoject (for e=aiple traftic, eQuipoent, operation, other• , . (2) Uhat tyye• and levels of Qoise vould De created Dq or a Moelatad vi[h the projset oo a nhort-cerm or a long-taea basi• (for e:aaple traifie. eocytruetion, opera[Son, othsr)' Iadicate vhac hour• noise vould com f ma c1u •ite r .~~1 ll l U Propoaed measure c) / educe or control noise topacts, if •n7 8 U':D AND SHORELI'JE USE a it i• the current w e the •ite •nd adjacent properties' t-..~,< ~ ` rr ~1 Cc1 ~'Vl ~~l~~~ ~ ~ J *1 -1~.c~n ~ b Iles the elte been used for agriculture' If •o, describe - - v~ O : E,S+, C rn~~= m~-Q c Deocribe 4ny •cructures on the site d V111 •ny etructures be desolished' If •o, vhichl ~Lot'i , KO e W%iet So the eurrenc soning clssslficatlon of the slte'~ ~ f Vhac is the eurrenc cmpreheosive pLn designacioo of the •ite? g If app1lcaDle, vhat Ls the curree[ •horeline osscer rogrsa desigcutioa of the site' h Hae any p&rt of the site been clasaified sa ao 'enviromencally sonsitive' stu ' If •o, specify 1 Approsioately hov oaoy eopl vould reside ar vorlc ia the camleced + ~ P Project J f ~ 7 ~ (Wp /C,197-11-960) Sec ~tion 11 PO 230(1) ~ SPdxANC ~EN7MOMMWiJI. OBDIHAFCB ~ , B ERVIRONldRfAi. Y.IMMNTS (eontiaued) % ~ °valwtion For Agency Use Ooly j Approzimcely hov nany people vould the coupleced project disp Lte? ~ Ic Proposed nersuns to avoLd or reduee dispLcmeat inpacts. if any ~ V 1 Proposed onaeures co ensure the pro9ona1 cospatible vitA eziatinE and projeeted lend uses and ~ plans, lf any a ~ c5 ~ `ZC7 Y11,11(~C~ • _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q , • C 9 NOUSING ' a Approximacely hov aany units vould De provlEad, if aayt Indlcats rhacher hiah-, siddle-, or lov-locome housing _ ~ V pr ~ `~yr D Approxioately hov aany units, lf aey, vould be elisioatad! Icdiu te vhet Mr high-. sLlddle-, or lov-incooe housing yV A c ProposeA measuras to reduce or control housing impaets, if aoy IVA, 10 AESTIIETICS a uhat is che tallest height ot any propossd struccure(c), not locludiog •n[enaW Vlut i• che prlncipel e:[erior Dullding oacerial s) propo•fd• . ~ , b uhec viev• in che lmmediste vicinity vould be altered or obs[ruccedt ~ c Proposed measures to ccduce or control aesthetie lapacts. Lf aay 11 LICH" AND GLARE a ' t type of:IY~ llght ot g L re vill tlxe ptopo"l produee' •Ihat tlme of day vould it maloly oetut' L' S ! ~ .LLJa ~ ~ ~ D Could 11gh[ or g Lre che tiaiahed pro}sct be asafety tu sard or intartere vicA •ie» 1 c Hlut e:isting off-slte 0: ofi~or gLre may •ffect ywr proposa17 I d Proposed nessurns o reduc or control light and g L ce lapacte. if any lkJ I~./~. .~►r~c~~C~~ 8 ~ • • ~ SPORAn QIPIBONMtiTAL ORDINANCE (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11 19 230(1) - ' S EAVIS0MM1fYAL BLJXZtJ'fS (eontlaved) Evaluation For Agency Uee Only 12 RECREATION a tJhst deol ted nd lnforpal reere~tlonal opport~mi le are in the imediace vieini[q' ' c . Ir A _S b Yould the proposed pTOjeet disp Lce aay e:isting recreation~l wee7 If eo, describe ✓ ~ c Proposed oeasures to raduce or coatrol ispacts on recrw tion. including tacrw tiooal opportunl- tle• to be provided by [he projeet or applicaat. if •oy 13 HIS:'ORIC AND CULTURAL YRESERVA':ION a Are there any places oT ob}ects listed o0 or proposed fot nacioosl, scate or local pieseTVa- tion reglster• krkown~a or next to the •ite' If to, generallq deseribe b Cenerally descriDe anr landnart• or evidence o[ historic arehaeological. scientific or cultural tmportance imwo to be o0 o rtezt to the sice c Proposed ■easure• to reduce or concr, lapaccs. if •ny ~ 14 : FJ►ttSPOR': A?ION • Identify public streets and highvays •erving the site and describe roposed a ee u to t~ existing strnet systea Shoron sSte pLns, ~ii aoy ~ ~S ►~.ar~ b I• eice eurrently •etved by public traaslt' It not, vhac 1• the •ppro:iaate distance to the nearest Ransit stop• "11C~ c Tlov oany parking spaces vould the coupleted projte[ havet 9ov maey vould the pro}eet elisiotte' d Vill che proposal require eay nsv rosd• or streets, or improvemnts to e:isting rwde or streat• noc inc d1aQ dtivevsyst If so, generally describe (lodiu te vMtM r puDlic or prlvate) e Will che project use (or occur le che loasdiate vicinit7r of) water, rail, ot alr transportatioo' if eo, generallq describe 1 L-C) 9 ~ r ' . sroKANE .cNviRaMMsi. osnrneRCZ ~ (VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 111Q 230(1) S. IIJVIROMffi*tAi, EyEl411?S (continutd) • r 1' y• Evalua[ion For Ageocy Use Only f Rov nany vehicular trip• per day vould De geaecated by the coeplated pro}eet' if Imovn, indicate vheo pesk would oecur ~ a \J 71D a L4 - - _ Pro esed oeasures to reduee ot eoetrol transpottatlon 1~ •,df aey. ` g ~ _-D ~ 15 PUBLIC SERVICES a uould the projeec cesult in an leeraased oeed for publie setviees (tor exasple, tire proteccioe, ' police procection, he h care, schooli, other)T If •o. generally describa V 4k) -sop ~ b Proposed seasure• to r u~ or Coatrol direct lapaets on puDlie •atvle*@, any ~ 16 U'ILI:'IES 1 a C c urrently svsi L Dle ft- leetriti3y~ rtatural gas, vace refu.e ~ service, ` lephon~ aani[ary •e . Cptie syKes. o ✓ ~ b Describe the utllitie• that are propoasd for the projeec. the utilit7 providin6 the •e nice aed the peneral constructioo activities oo the slte or in the Saoediato vicinity vhieh a1Qht be needed C SICNA'I'URE I, the underslgned, eveac under the penalty ot perjut7r that the aDove Tespon ss a[e made trvthfully and to the besc ot oy kaovledge I also underecand thec, should there De any villful nlsrepresentstion or vlllful Lck of full disclosure on mI part, the Meecy aay vlthdrav any decermination of nonsignlfleaoce chac ic sighc imsue in reliaoee upon chi• cAeelclisc Dace -1 ~ o - `~J Propooent 0,4~~1 ~ C (Ylease Print or Type) + Proponent Addre q ` O e1Cs~e- 1 ys 6~~ OR40 (Signature) J + v Phone ~~ZJCj -7 Person eonplecing tom Orte 7-l V <q!~5 Phone + YOR SiAtY IISE OHLY StefE member(e) revleving checlclist Based on chio •taf cevlev of the ronaental ehecklist and other pertinent infonation, the staff A Concludes that ther e no proDaDle slgnifiuot adverse lapacts aod reeamsaods a docariLinatioo of noasignlticance B Coaeludee tha[ proDable significant adverse environaental lnpacta do eu at for the curreet proposal aed recosaend• a oltigated deter- olnatlon of nonaignificante vitR conditloos C Concludes that chere are probable slgnificant adverse eavironmental isputa aod reeamends a determieation of significaoce TILING !M - !75 00 10 Z ~ -3o fgS - - t , • ~ oA+ ~ r' .Y-O,~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 0 ~ _ ; 'V, 4tolA 1 ~ ' ~►~`1~ ~ ~ ► ~ • . + c~ N > ~~5+0 ~ 6 . ~ SO~ , j o Qx~~~ ~~`y ~ "e. ' ~ ~ i s ~ ' 1 'i~~~ 7 l' ~ ^ ~ y~~,•~~~ ~3~" ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~r' 1.,~C~ r. Xa ~ x . t~ CjCj -ro , ~ L Lco~~ s Yr",."......" i 1 , r i i ~ t CA ~ ~ l.~ ~„{•t~~~ <J ~~-~t ~e ~.~i ,A,~., i LOV ~ Cc-) C) ~ I j. . . , SPOKANE COUNTY'',-PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICA.TION APPLICATION ~ PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATION: 9- S PRS NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE A . L4 MAILING ADDRESS. I2ri- CITY: STATE ZIP ~ PHONE. (?CL (work) eflCt (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS RESENTATIVE. , LEGAL OWNER'S NAME ~ y Q-mE, 9-- AC~Aj- PHONE ~1~g.a"-c~~ ^J/~j/ 7 MAII.ING ADDRES S • ~ • ~•t• l 11U00, ' CITY ~ STATE ZIP ,,CO ~ ~ PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL `-t' 5 --~?.a 4 s 0 r3 0 1 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED 1~ 1 , , S'IREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISH D) EXISTIING USE OF PROPERTY J PROPOSED ZONIlVG v COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY 1I X A N 1U W! IN SCHOOL DISTRICT J FIRE DISTRICT ~ WATER PURVEYOR C. i~,~r~lQ ~ Q r~~ PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY • Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellzngs Manufactured homes Business ~ Industrial Mixed Use Other ( ) - Descnbe ' LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS 1NVOLVING THIS PROPERTY. LI-9 -7 q -`~7 " -70 B. LE GAL/ZONE RECLA.SSIFICATIn~,1 It4FnR 1V~TInNI LOCATION OF PROPOSAL s 1F ~ ` ``i SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGEg ' / ~ .~CCJ-- N ME F PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVJDING ACCESS Vu ~ IV ~ 0 ~3 WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD v1,q,-t4,kXt LW 1~~.~ V-1 s,~.., CoLvL% C)6 ~ S,~aa.: 0-}6 r - - ~ ZOk RECLASSIFICATIOL _ iPPLICAT'ION Page 2 of 4 . r DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN TERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ~YES NO i,, ~ NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS CQY1~L~•1~1 (yVuc~- LEGAL DE RIPTION OF PROP RTY FOR EACH ZONE RE -:LASSIFI TION P OPOSEp. (',r 0-Jp cf' o n c-C r' Lj/~- nn:~ j- nrA ~ e~ 'z- C EXISTING ZONE(S) TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) f ~1~,)G►~ ~ ~ FOR THE FOLLOWIING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH I.EGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE . , BELOW. _L C5A n~_c~ ~ - (''i~ S n ml Q 4c> rco-cn ►'l. ~..4.~ _ e ~ c~s ~ .G _ , IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TTTLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR IIVTEREST IN M. ~r-e-~ - C~ WHAT ARE THE CHANGED ~ONDITIONS OF TFiE ARE WHICH Y U FEEL M THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? bnQCs- . A-= - 1, ~ . JA-A IU qno~k "=L~. "Q tcl~O-t ~ ^ ` - ~Qrk QL,Vt. CL-p(`..o ,-UA-Q- Q HCk~ C`tyn , ~ a...- ~ ~xlrrr ~ Scc~~ ~ 5- L'~ WHAT IMPACT HE ROPOSED qfi&NE RECL SSIFICATIO HAVE ON Tf~ ADJACENT PROPER'IMS? ~ O ~ ~o C~ CT U4l. GI,, U_R, C~CC~' s~b ' . C RS SUPPO T THE ZONE RECLASSIF~IC~ I~? C~ WHAT FA O C, , . . QA.-~ ~ ~ )c~-~ 6j-bj WHAT ASURES DO YOU PROPOS TO MITIGA Y UR PROPOS' ACT ON LLi SUR.ROUNDING LAND USE~ _ , 1400t ).S t -t-D A~ o 1 .~r~. ?OVE RECLASSIFICATTOr °PLICATION Page 3 of 4 v,. PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE IIVCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT a A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHTN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~ B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) dMVE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUIILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE O: =&JRZ / /itirsiO'~C7srZ FIRE DISTRICT ~ SIGNa'IUfZE/`T'ITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FLRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE ~ B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS ~ ~ aJ/~.~%a~-C-•a " 7~ WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUu~E/TITLE DATE , COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS , AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS t= C / LY S IC;NATC&EI'~LE DATE , COUNTY UTILITIES PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ~ SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED ~ iVATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ A COMMENTS ~ . ATURE/TITLE DATE ! HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAEE AND-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) WA,VE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. N Y/ / a' A COMMENTS Z W V-,- , SIGNATLJREMTLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A.RE UNDERSTOOD BY -~4P+b T A COMMENTS ~ 1 ~ _ ✓ SIGNA ITIDATE ✓ :~s - G0I4E 2ECLASSIFICATTOt 'PLICATION Page 4 of 4 ~ . ~,~S E• PART III SURVEYOR VERIFTCATION ERSI, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMI'LETED THE INFORMATTON ~ ~~EQ FO ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION I ~967 ~ D ~•~,~~-A.~, , DA'IE EXPIRES 7,17, y 7 . 1-4 S)(-) . A PHOIVE• ~ r ZIP ~ PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATTON) I, 'IHE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR A,FFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT T'HE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTTON, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PE ISSION FROM THE O AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. - --~c~ ~ ~ l \ ' C,r e ~S . ~ G ` NAME. (-LL'y\G '-P '.S D ATE ~ 1 , ADDRESS l__ S I V ~ 4) Yl'1UY1 PHONE ZIP 2" t C, r-:40 ~ i ` SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 199 B Y - ~ . ~ ~ AF ► O: • ~ ~Q,► ✓ o*01 ARY ~ Notary Public in and for t e State of Washington ~ Residing at. ~ pUBI~G '~~`s'~'G'f'F 15 ~~0?~ My apFomtment xpires: / F WAS~`N i PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPA.RTMENT) DATE SUBNiITTED FILE DATE ACCE BY TOTAL FEES : I RECEIPT u( e, f .i,' 7 ~ . . ~ • . °ia.o OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 -,UBDIVISION CONDTTTONS- TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Plats Administrator FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard DATE: August 9, 1995 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # ZE-XX-95 / AYERS PAMELA S The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled August 9, 1995. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: E40 Access permits•for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer E43 Applicant shall sunmit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire pro3ect or portion thereof if the development is phased E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles E48 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. E50 The County Engineer has designated a Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Dishman Mica Road which is ad3acent to the proposed development This will require th~e addition of approximately 12-14 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. E50 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Hatherly Court which is ad3acent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 27 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing, gutter and sidewalk and sidewalk on one side must also be constructed E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are appla.cable to this proposal. E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area.of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 80-0726) E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer E59 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements ~ t ~ SUBDIVISION CONDITIQNS; # ZE-XX-95 / AYERS PAMELA S 2 shall be filed with the County Engineer. E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Dishman Mica Road as a 100 foot Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 20 in width along the Dishman Mica Road frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Dishman Mica Road. E90 The applicant qhould be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPECIAL CONDITION. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. SPECIAL CONDITION: The applicant shall provide documentation though a flood study that no more than 5t of the site shall contain imprvious surface and that the commercial structure shall be floodproof. PAGE 1 14:20:05 01 AUG 1995 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference,,~~,.gczpiptio Road Log Info.......... 00880 DISHMAN-MICA RD (STA 00.000 SR 27 R 07 PAVED 24 DISHMAN-MICA RD 00.020 VICARI RD (START) R 07 PAVED 24 00.380 BR 4490 UNDERPASS FO R 07 PAVED 24 00.880 MADISON RD (END) R 07 PAVED 24 02.490 HALLETT RD (END) R 07 PAVED 24 03.030 MOHAWK DR (START) U 14 PAVED 24 DISHMAN MICA RD 03.820 THORPE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 24 03.850 BR 4522 OVER PLOUF C U 14 PAVED 24 DISHMAN-MICA RD 04.010 HATHERLY CL (START) U 14 PAVED 22 04.110 HATHERLY CL (END) U 14 PAVED 22 04.190 WILBUR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 22 04.340 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 22 04.650 4 0 TH AV ( S TART) U 14 PAVE D 22 05.050 UNIVERSITY RD (START U 14 PAVED 22 05.320 32ND AV (START) U 14 PAVED 34 05.560 28TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 34 05.720 26TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 34 DISHMAN MICA RD 05.830 24TH AVE U 14 PAVED 34 DISHMAN-MICA RD 05.860 HERALD RD (START) U 14 PAVED 34 06.180 19 TH AV ( S TART ) U 14 PAVED 34 06.390 16TH AV (END) & 16TH U 14 PAVED 58 06.930 8TH AV (START) & DIS U 14 PAZTED 58 06.990 7TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 58 07.170 4TH AV (START) U 14 PAVED 58 07.390 1ST AV U 14 PAVED 62 DISHMAN-MICA RD (END 07.480 SPRAGUE AV & MULLAN U 14 PAVED 62 1 Records Processed ~ . . S P O K A N E A' C O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTmNT Ronald C Hormann, P E, County Engvneer Dennis M Scott, P E, Dirertor _ E=VIO To: John W Pederson and Louis Webster, Planrung Dept From: Brenda Sims and Katheruie Miller, Stormwater Utility Subject: Pamela Ayers Zone reclassification (UR-3 5) to (B-3) Date: August 9, 1995 The proposed zone reclassification is srtuated partially or wholly within a 100 year flood hazard area The proponent will need to obtain a floodplain development pernvt from the engineers office pnor to any development taki.ng place on-srte The reyuirements in this area are that no more than 5% of the floodplain can be covered with impervious surfaces and the lowest floor, including subgrade floors be at or above the flood level elevation for that area (contact Tamrrue Wiluams for tlus elevation), or the structure needs to be flood proofed to that elevation These requuements are apphcable on all new development and substantial improvements to existing structures aAy- 1026 W Broadway Ave • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 324-3478 TDD (509) 324-3166 , . 4 ' . 1 • August 9, 1995; 2:15 p.m.: PAMELA AYERS ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Dishman- Mica Road and Hatherly Circle in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban, and within Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONIlVG: Urban Residential-7 (LJR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) PROJECTI4N DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Regional Business (B-3) for an existing beauty salon and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone. PARCEL #(s): 45334.0201 STTE SIZE: Approximately 7,000 sq. ft. APPLICANT: Pamela S. Ayers E 11518 Dishman-IVfica Road Spokane, WA 99216 (509) 922-2007 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Louis Webster . . , . +i . ~ 11 ,"rall=.a~~~ S P O K A N E O U N T Y DEPARTMENT OF BURDINC AND PLANNING • A DIVTSION OE TNE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT JnMES L. Mnrrsotv, C.B.O., DiREcroR DENtvis M. Scort, P.E., DtxECroR RE~a~Eo ~z ~ 1995 MEMORANDUM ~ EWOet►a TO: Pat Harper, Spokaae County Division of Engineeriog Brenda Sims, Stotm Water Utility Jim Red, Sgokane County Utilides Department Steve Holderby, Spok.ane County Health District Wyn Birkeathal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Departcllent Greg Figg Depaztment of Transportation Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authoriry Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Central Valley School District Fire Protection District No. 1 Chester Waterworks FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Plannerq DATE: July 26, 1995 , . RE: Pamela Ayers Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Regional Business (B-3) ~ APPLICATION ACCEPTANCF AND DESI rN REVIEW MEETIN T August 9, 1995 AT 2:15 P.M. GOUNTY PLANNINC CONFERENCE ROOM. 24D FLOOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPoLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REYIEW MEETiNG FORM for your commenis. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representarive have been , invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Louis Webster for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCfiPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring thrgg copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Louis Webster of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Pamela Ayers Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WEST BKOADwnY AvFNUE • SPOKANE, WASE{INGTO,I 49260 BUrLDwG PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 45b-4703 PLnNNt;vc Ptt~N11- (509) 456-2245 • FAx, (509) 456-2243 T[)D: (5()9) 324-316t1 ~ w , i 1 . ti' • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ~ PART I A. GENERAL INFnRMA7'ION: S NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE A . a4e-As MAILING ADDRESS ~ QZ5~X r^O-r. Vl~, Y&A c_' CITY. ~P' STATE U.-A. ZIP ~i PHONE: qo-l~)' (work) eaa (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRIT'TEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS RESENTATIVE. 4 LEGAL OWNER'S NAME ~0" ',~-me.- 9--- Rcr IZj- PHONE 9a:)-'o~~7 MAMnvG ADDxEss h"Na n CITY. ~ STATE ZIP ~ PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) ~000 ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 4 5 ~ ) 4 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED V J ~ STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL lcS LL t-4-1 EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATTON(S) (DATE ESTA.BLISHED) EXISTIING USE OF PROPERTY &CL-~ PROPOSED ZONING V3 G COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY ~ PY, AA IrU ujl 1N SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 J FIRE DISTRICT t WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY • Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes Business ~ Industnal Mixed Use Other ( ) - Descnbe• ' LIST PREVIOUS PLANTIING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY• 1 ~ - ~ q ~ - -70 B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFTCATInN XNFnRHATInr LOCATION OF PROPOSAL `"1 SECTION ~ ~ TOWNSHIP RANGELj L 1-.'~1~/~l N ME F PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVJDING ACCESS , ~ o WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD• ' • v~ ; ~ L~ r,V~6 ,Yt ~1~5 ~'1 w~t,r ~ 4• ~f g} I~J ~ y r ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATTON Page 2 of 4 ' DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN TERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ~YES NO 1n •n ~ NAME(S) OF A.RTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DE RIPTION OF PROP RTY FOR EACH ZONE RE CLASSIFI TTON P OPOSEp. Ct t,l,Qr%-L Clyi ~ ;(NA fN o n c~e r~ ~;c-)1 r) EXISTING ZONE(S) TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ ~ L- FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW. _ 1 CA tr' 4V vuazo vL Ct9.~' ~ c~s ~ ~ a IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITI.E TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _ dw ru~. WHICH Y U FEEL M THIS WHAT ARE TI-E CHANGED ONDITIONS OF TI~.E ARE PROPOSAL WARRANTED? ~ p ~ 0 --~-A.kzn ~.oQ ~ O-Q~ ^_p C~C~ .,~.C~ LL) Cry,. _ rt z~OtS S.- 'csln WHAT IMPACT ROPOSED NE RECL SSIFICATIO HAVE ON TI-E ADJACENT PROPERT'ES? ~ ~~2 Y'~Q~'~~ O ~ ~ k-d ~-C~ ' ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LJ ~ ~.c~C Cm ACI WHAT FA ORS SUPPO T THE ZONERECLASSIFICATI . ' AfAttD %gn i7ki.+-, OL- ~ C)"k . A3n , WHAT ASURES DO YOU PROPOS TO MITIGA UR PROPOS 'S ACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? N:k ~--c~ . 1S ZeO -L)Lk.~,_ ~ . ca . ► , \ r ~ ZIONE RECLASSIFICATION A.PPLICATION Page 3 of 4 ' PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATTON WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPA.RTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMTNARY CONSUr.TATION WITH TIT-EE AGENCIES IDEN'I'IFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL, SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIC;T NO ~ B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) tWAVE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WA'TERSY FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW > , OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUII..DING PERMIT APPLICATION TTME D REQIJIREMENTS INCLUDE 63~ZZLJ3L ~ Ixta zA/m-.A~ FIRE DISTRICT ~ SIGNA'fUREfI'ITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FTRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS ,/-z~--~~-- WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUI~t/TIT1.E DATE COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS ~ C= C C~~ C'a ~ L -7 _IS S IG~`NATU1kE~'I E DATE ~ ~ N COUNTY UTILITIES PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ~UBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED , ~VATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ ~ A COMMENTS ~ ..1~-~ `d~ t I1 ~ -M~A~TURE/TITLE DATE / HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAEE,OND-GZNERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) CXVE NOT~~ BEEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS k) Lc~~, c- (,cc~.~.. c, yt s r~ 4-, ~ ` lre- 7,7_ 9S S IGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A.RE UNDERSTOOD BY~I~-~b T ~ - A COMMENTS ~ - ~ , • , , / SIGNA ITI, DATE ..r •~.a' ~ ZONE UCLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ~ h ERSI, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION ~ FO ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIP'fION. ~ ~Q ~ Si967 . ~ L f D DATE. 7/z- i / t~. J,r ExPIREs 7171 97 9` b--- i~2 Z. l~ e. ~d PHONE: K, l-. .e1 C j GA/ A ~ Z IP. ~ PART IV (SIGNAT[JFZE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORLZATTON) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFTRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERNRY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFTRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE 4WNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PE ISSION FROM THE O AUTHORLZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. 1 ~ei-s -NAME: ~ -;'4"fm DATE ~'-q S ADDRESS: QYY1Qv1 I I~ irct ~ PHONE 7 k-A ZLP• ~ctr~o ~ 7- SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATTVE DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF ~.r r5 199 BY 7 Q'~ ~ . v L ~ • . ~ Mj ~L~~~~~~i~ . •,s ~n,Q'~/ ~ v W-a Q~~ fo Notary Public in and for e State of Washington Reslding at: 7 ~Z9-~F 15 My appointment xpires ~f ~,lF •0 ...1••~ 00 !liiii 16- PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTTvENT) DATE SUBMITIED: FII.E . DATE ACCEP'TED: BY: TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT ~ ~ . . . ENGINEER'S REVZEW SHEET BLUG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# ~I1 Related File # ( ) Date to Review Timc # Date to AA & DR 8-25-93 Tinie 2:15 Date Rcceived 8-16-93 Project Name UR-7 TO B-2 BEAUTY SALUN No. Lots No.Acres 8,SQF T "Sechon - Township - Range STfE ADDRESS DiSHMAN-MICA E 11518/W HATHERLY CIR PARCEL # 33544-0201 Applicant's Name PAMF_l.A nYERS Phone # 924-3896 Address PO BOX 14563-SPOKANL WA 99214 Work # Date Conditions mailed Contact person Phone # FLOOD "LONE v Y W S SCHOOL 356 Eogineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name Planning Contact Person S1EVE DAVENPORT Phone # 456-2205 FDate Submitted Description Initials AGRELMENT TO PAY TEES COMPLETED & COPY 'PO ACCOUIV'ITNG FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLIiTED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLE"IED - OR NEEDS TO BF SIGNFD DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMI'1"TED , AL,TERATION 'PO PLAT - BI.OCKS & LOTS HL-'ARING EXAM APPROVED UENIED-_APPEALED BBC _APPROVED UENIED L ~ eview, or Of= FI CE t7 F= l l--I E C L7 UNT`( FI\IG.[ lu FER SPnk Ah1E Ct7IJNTY, WASI-i l NC 1"ah! A Lt cli_t st A-259 199: ; T -z- o ~pr-fE ane Coun ty I'1annincf Department (Cl_irrEnt Planning Administratc-1r ) Fro.n~ SpoE ane Cr-,unty Enqirieer' s Dep~rtment Q~" Suta)ect: Conditions of Apprc-val Z---Ine Change h!c3al1r»ssigned Appl1 C aI'1 tsa ~ amE A yer s 5ecta.on 33, Tc-wnSP°iip nlp RanU~ 44 IEWlh re:_Zonirig The folloW 1 ('i q "C oP1 d1 t1 c-I-1 s ~=.f App1`' oV al" f oY the ci b oV E 1'' efei°' eI"i t: C-' ~ Zone chariqe are si_tbmitteci tcl tl-ic= ~rx-jF ~.~ne County ('1anniiiq Depar i:ment for i-ric1~~sic-ri in t he DesYgn Ft eview Mee tin ci sch ie d i_t1 t d Au~~~~ st_ r' 1993. E a6A F'r a. c-Ir to x~~ suan ce ~_-fa bj_i i] dii i c~ ~,er~ rn t ~_-r~.~ t t!-te reqi_test tW~ fi t F~ e G-~-!_a r~ t y E riqir-~ee r i n c~~ nji_: n c t a~ ~~in^ witI-, a Lc-,unt y Rc-ad ~rr-I)ect/ Roac8 T In~rovement Da.str-ict, wl-iic:f-eevezP <~~tion comes fx.rsto E%3 FJ Applxcarit shal.l dedic~~~ ~ ~ep- t !-n Dxshmrn Nlica Road f.--.r riqht i if W c.~ ~ puI`' posPs. E3E3 App lic a ritsh~.-~ l. 1 dedicate ap2 1j c!ab1 e raci l+Asc-n L7 is!°imani`rllca Rc-ad ai id Hat ~er, 1y_C2Lrt. N' riorto re1easc ofa bui]. d i r~ g per mitcir- usP c-f t I-ie proper t y a s pY opo5 E' d: E40 A cces=_s ppr mits for approa c hes to the Coun t y Rc-ad Sy~~~ shal 1 ta e obtaz r»cl f r cim the Cc-t_tnty Enqineer. E43 Appl i cant :3hc-t1 1si_tI..~ma.t for apprr_-va1 by LlI-~~~ ~poI <anP COUnty Eriozneer r~-Daci, dr ai~iaqe G~nd access tal<anso E44 T'~~z appl a. can t sr~.~l 1 s4_tt~m~.t r-~-r~ appr ~~va1 by ~poR ane Cciunty En y i neeir an d thi~ ~~-zirar Cc-i_tr-ity I-I ea 1 t i-i Distr- ict a det~.~ iled cc-Imba.necf on-site sewaqe system plan and si_~rface water dx5posai p 1 a n fc-rtf-ie en tir- e p rojer_ t !--irporta.or7 thereof i f tI°ie devPlopment ia ptia~ed. ' , . L pG1qC .r.. E4; ,q parl inq plan and tr-affic circul~tion plan sha11 be sijlama.tted and appr~---Ived by the rpolane C;ounty Eriqineero °fhe desiqrz, locatic--n and ar~ angement of parN ing stal 1s sI-ia t 1 be in ,accorrJance wa.th standard enqineerana ptracticesa Pavx.nq c-r sijrfaciiiq as approved by the C-at_irity Fngineer wi11 be r~quired tc-Y' afl ~ poY t1 oI'1 of t("i G pY I) ect W h1. cVt is tc- be ci C C L! P 1 @ d o1` travelecJ by vehiC3e~ E4£3 Tr~e ccnnstri(c tion of the rc-adway a.mprovement~ statAd hereirl sf-,al 1 t~~ acr_omplx.shed as apprc-weci by the ~~:)O~ane Cc,itnty Enqxneera E5t) The CoiAnty Ee°iciineer has des-Lgnated TYpica7 Rc-adway Ser_ta.c-n IVumbcr Oneg_Ma>or _Arter-ia1 Stai-idard for tl-~e improvement of L7a.shman_rlica_Road whxcl-~~is ad)acert tci the propcised devc-lopment. Tt~x~~w.~11 ifeq~_~ir-e ~he ~..~dditxt-nn of appy-=axa.mately 13_15 ft. of ' asp ha1t a1ori q t 1-ie frc-i-itac~ e of t I-ie devel~~~ pme i-it o Gur binqan cl si de w a! E mi-R s t a1<s -D be cc-i-istri_t ct E d. E5t;y 1"i-~e C-~~~_~nty Enqii-ie~=r ~~as ciesiqri~~~ed Typical I3coar1way Sectxon Nitmber C)ne. _Loca1_AccP-aS stt..=~nciard fc-r the a.mpr-_-vement --If hlatherly_Court whYCI-~~is _-:kd)~.~cR_nt tr-I tF:e proposed develcipmenta T F~ ~~~w.a. 1 re q ua. r e theau ditaOn-_If aF., ~~-r-0, x mate I y 30 f t . of aspl-ial.t al-Dng tFie frontage Of ti-ie developmei-ittl Ci_trbing and s i d e w a1. l mLi st a1S-D be cori stri_tc tecf . E51 A11 requa.red impr-ovements sh~11 conf-Drm to tl-ie curreni; State ofi Wash1 nqton Stand~.~rd Speciiic~..,tic-Ins fior Rc-ad and Bridqe coristruetion and other app3xcable c~~-unty standards and1or C~d-.pteu ~~so1 uti=-ins pertaininq pert~..~iningi br~ Rc-ad Standar-ds and St~~r-m~raie~° f~<~naqemer7~: .~n effer~~ at tI-,e daLe of ti.-instri_ictic-Ir,, i_tn LE~s otherwi=_,e aF:,proved tay triP C-Dun ty Lngineer. E55 R£,oadway standardsq typic~l r-oaciwAy <Mecta ons an(J drainac~e plan 1`'eqLl1YefT1el"itc-, c71`'E' foLlf1d lfl SpolanE B►JaY'd of Coullt}/ CoffifYi]1.551-»+lZE'1"s re so1ut ion 80-1 ;92 as amen cJ Pd ~.~a nd ar c~ app1 i. cab 1~ ~oD t his p r opc-s a1 . E57 -rhat the requlatxons of ttie Nata.c-nal F].oc►d I nsi-trance Prorar am be obser v e d s i n ce t he p r j-poseci ci eve1oprn entis affecte d tyy a f 1-Dc-d ha: ar-d zoneA A development permit sha7. I be obtained frc-m the Cclunty Entaaneer before r_cEnstri_tct.~-Dn c-r development bega.ns within any ar ea i-if the spPcia1 flood t~a-zarc! :orze (reference Spc4ane 8~ -~~a5~' 1 a ~~~iLtnty 0rd inai-ice ~ ~'J cl L7 E' ..3 "1 E58 No cc-ns#: r uction wc-r E i~ tc- be p e r fc-rmed with in t I-r ~exx. 5 t i n g or pr~~~ pos ed rx c7 ht cif wa yun t a 1 a per m i t i-~ ~s beei-i issued b y t he Ccii_inty Enqineer. , All worl within the pi_ibl i c r ~;ad rigFrt of way is ruhaect to inspection and appr-Dval by tl-Ee G~~-unty Englneero E39 A 1 1 Y' f? (a i_l 1 1'' eCi construc t x. on withinthe P•, i s fi i n q c-ir p roposed pi_ib1 ic right ~~11 w ay is t o b e c com p1 e t ed p ri c-i° tc- t he re1 e as e of bLti1 d iriqper m i t -_-ra bc-n d in ar~ amoun t estim~.~ t e d b y t f~ ~Cc-i_tnty Et1glf1eeY' to CoVeY the C1:.-5t ~.:if Cr_-i"15ti"uCt1ofi oi" 1f11(JYciVe(11E'rlta sFicll1 h P fa. l ed w i{: h t I-~ ~Coi_tnty E i-iclx n e e rw EE.,1 The Coi_tr7ty ArtFryraal Road plan identifies Dishman_Nlica_Coad ~.~s a Pricx.oal ArZer-ialo Th~ exi<stiriq ricaht c-f«way~wirl-tl-~~of_.Gt) ft. is n►w►~~ccnn5.x.stent wltl-j that speczfied in 1"he Pl.and In ordcr t.--. imp].ement tFie Arter-.~al R---=ad F'] an i.t zs ree-Dmmenclecl that i n ad ditic-n t-D ttie re quir- ed rzgI-f t iw-f way ded a. cata. c-n q a sti~ ~p ofi E:,roperty 16 ttti x.n width a] onq the I.}ishman Mi~~ Road frc►r~tngE bQ set ~siLde in reserve4 This pr-ciperty m~.~y be acquiired by ~poE ane Coun ty at', the tirne when Ar tPrial Imprcivernents are rnade tc- Di-~~ii-na.rj Mir_a-% I'ciad. E9C) "fF~~~~ i-iic=y exist uta.li fi:ies, either underground c-r overhead, affC Ct1.1'1 q thesubje ct propert w, i ri c li_~ din U pr- ~:)er- t y tc-, be dedicated cir seE asid~ for fLttLtre acquisztion. Spo} ane C-Dunty assit t71 es i"1 o fi-nai-ic-ia 1 cibZ 1 gc..~ tl F=-( i fcir ad)ust; !Tl '-tr'' I"1 ts C-1'' 1'' E? loC aticif l r°eq~.~rdxr~g tf~~~e utilities. App] icarit sF~~~lulcl checE witi-i the c'Appl3 (:c~blf? uti 1 ity purveyor ar-id t!-ie Spc-b an~ Coi_inty lEngintm-er t-<< cietermxnp whether appl i can tor the Lkt i1 a.ty is responsible f-Dr ad Jitstment oY Ye1oCat1.c-Cl C----sts aflCj ~t.-- fT1Ll~ e cll''Yai-lgeiileil~~ 'ic-i` afl,/ ner_esa~~ry wc-rl o Spe ci~..=~ 1 Cc-nd a. t icins: Thxs app1 icat.i.cin ahaI L riot tae p1aced on an agencia until the app11 rant has i-E ad anop p-_-ir t una. t y tc~ spe~.~ I w i i. I-i T~.a mm y Wil. zams9 F 1ood f' Iai-n Acimzrtl s tra t---- rp No more thian 5;/ of the si-te can be a.mpervic-+_ts y+_trfac.e and tt-~~ exisLinq str4_tcti_are bPinq commercial zn nati_tre, sI-,a11 be fi c-ocl pr ooled. \ ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report V~e~~eraeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; °AGE 1 14:34:23 16 AUG 1993 0 oad# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00947 DISHMAN-MICA FRONTAG 00.000 BMP of road U 19 GRAVEL 24 ° 0880 DISHMAAI-MICA RD 00.000 BMP of road R 07 PAVED 24 0 00.880 MADISON RD R 07 PAVED 24 ° 02.490 HALLETT RD R 07 PAVED 24 0 03.030 MOHAWK DR U 14 PAVED 24 ° 04.110 HATHERLY CL U 14 PA`IED 22 0 04.140 WILBUR RD U 14 PAVED 22 ° 04.330 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 22 0 04.650 40TH AV U 14 PAVED 22 ° 05.040 SCHAFER RD U 14 PAVED 22 0 05.290 32ND AV U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22 ° 05.560 28TH AV U 15 PAVED 34 0 05,720 26TH AV U 15 PAVED 34 ° 05.860 HERALD RD U 15 PAVED 34 0 06.180 19TH AV U 15 PAVED 34 ° 06.390 16TH AV U 15 PAVED 58 0 06.930 8TH AV U 15 PAVED 58 ° 06.990 7TH AV U 15 PAVED 58 $eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Prass [F1] for help) ° flaa a aa a ea a a a a aea aaaaaaa aaaa a A a a aaaaaa aaaaaaCA aaaacici CA CA CA CA aaaCA CA Ci aaaaCA CA aa~a CA CA &aaaaaCA °Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page ° 0 ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report View~ertieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~ °PAGE 1 14:36:35 16 AUG 1993 0 °Road# Road Names..... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 001876 HATHERLY CL 00.000 BMP of road U 19 GRAVEL 180 ° 00.030 WILBUR RD U 19 GRAVEL 18 ° 00.040 DISHMAN-MICA RD U 19 GRAVEL 180 0 01 Records Processed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) ° Aaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaddddaaaaddaaaaaaaaaaaac'i'ciciciciciaaaaaaaaaaq °Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page 0 I \ . • . August 25, 1993 at 2:15 p.m. Robert and Pamela Ayers Zone Reclassification Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersecaon of Dishman- 1Vhca Road and Hatherly Cucle, in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Urban within Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential (UR-7) and Community Buszness (B-2). PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone reclassification from Urban Residential (UR-7) to Communiry Business (B-2) for a beaaty shop and those uses allowed in the Community Business (B-2) zone. PARCEL NUMBER• 45334 0201 SITE SIZE• Approximately 8,000 square feet APPLICANT. Robert & Pamela Ayers P. O Box 14563 Spokane, WA 99214 (509) 924-3896 - ASSIGNED PLANNER: Steve Davenport ~ , a ~ ♦ 1 • tit S P O K A. N E C O U N T Y / PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D HUBBARD, DIRECTOR ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Bukenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Ted Trepaiuer, Department of Transportation TomWells, Department of Health Chnstma Fueston, Spokane Transit Authonry Central Valley School Dismct No. 356 Chester Water Supply Fire Dismct No. 1 Department of Ecology FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner C DATE: August 10, 1993 RE: Robert & Pamela Ayers Zone Reclassificanon from Urban Residenhal (UR- 7) to Commuruty Business (B-2) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETINC AUGUST 21 1993-AT 2•1 m .CnUTY PLANNING CONFERFHCE RQOM. 2ND FLnnR Please review the above apphcation and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at thls meeting. The sponsor and representanve have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS wfll be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bnng xhre& copies to the meeting) Thanks for your cooperaaon If you have any questxons about the application, please contact Steve Davenport of the Planning Department at 456-2205 c Robert & Pamela Ayers, P. O Box 14563, Spokane, WA 99214 Charles E. Simpson, 909 N. Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212 Attachments. AppLcation Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 , , s . ~ . t s . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATI4N APPLICATION PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAMEOF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Lmt~~ ~ - -4L ozS MATLING A.DDRESS: ) CITY• C) STATE• ZIP: Q1co PHQNE• oj_D. q " .~,aq(o (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE A REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME 906 ~ ~ ~riG ,1~ LIC12's PHONE q c~ ~ ~ 3b 9 (O ~ MAILING ADDRESS O-bOU,Q- CITY STATE• ZIP: PROTECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 1010U0 ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL S -1 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 8 11S1,6 D i 5v) mo..r\ ` ~ Y EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) ( D iZ "-7 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY RCACLQ PROPOSED ZONING Q) -'21 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY SCHOOL DISTRICT \dcL- ! FIRE DISTRICT -0-1 WATER PURVEYOR CN PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Single family dwellings Duplexes Mul[ifamily dwellings Manufacnred homes Business ~Q Industnal Mixed Use Other ( ) - Descnbe. LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: B. LECALLWNF RF,CLgSSIFICeATInN INFnRMATIONz LOCATION OF PROPOSAL• SECTION J~ TOWNSHIP C~SIv RANGE L~~~~L~~$ h ~ NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: 0-i5~ff~c~ ~ 9Q.~L fl WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 06 1~..~- ~ ~~ONE RECLASSIFICATION A.PPLIGATTON µ•Page 3 of 4 PART II TIIIS SECTION OF THE A.PPLICATIOI`d WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNIlVG DEPARTIVENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATTON THAT T'HE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDEN'TIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMWARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED ~N IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO TI-E PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. l.~ B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS CFM~~ (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECI'ION PURPOSES ~ ~L C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW• OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEF7NITIVE, AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUIL,DING PERMIT APPLICATTON TIME. D REQUIl2EMENTS INCLUDE: FIRE DISTRICT SIGNAT'UREfITTLE DATE , WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) ( BEEN MADE t, L B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS WATER DISTRICT SY NAT'URE~I' 6ATt COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AiND DRAIINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH ri APPLICANT A COMMENTS I S IGNATURE/TI DATE ( COUNTY UTYLITIES ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS F4R SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A COMMENTS SIGNATUREfI'ITLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. A COMMENTS SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ~ . ~ ~ PERMIT CENTER PA,,S$PO,RT - ~ Date Number ~ Narne v~p Phone Address ' Comments CUSTOMER ROUTING ~ r r ~ - . r r J ~p~~~1~P PoP,.a~ept.. . . G1N?'& .r ~e.pa~~4~►~. , , Addressmg , Admin. Exception : Approach Permit ~ Building Permit i Arterial Rd Plan Info - Flood Plain PerTnit ~ Code Information ~ Bmding Site Pian Info ~ Public/Private Roads , Commercial Review i Cert. of E.xemption ~ Res. Bldg Permit Rev. s Conference ~ Comprebensive Plan ~ Site Drainage Info = Energy Code Info ~ Cond. Use PerTnit ~ Subdivision Review , Fire Safety Review , Nonoonforming Use Wiry Permit s Manufactured Home ~ Permit Review Zone Change Review ~ ~51~ C A,Ar- I-1\(C/I- Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info I Other Permits Short Plat Info Na`FEE iRev~wer Tuve out 4? ~ Pltunbing Permits i Subdrvision Info ~ ~ Private Road Info : Temp. Use Permit ~l3'[TE.1T1~S D~p~ttmeht ,;,;'rr v, i Residential Review i Variance Appl. , APA Payment : Sewaer Perm its = Zone Check s Cert. of Exemption Zoae Info Subdrvision Review ULID/Sewoer Info = Zone Change Review ~ NO FEE REQUIRED NO FF.,E REQUIRED Reviewoer Tune out Reviewer T'une out Reviewer T'une out t(ASMWassroRiJM viem . • _ b ~ D RECEIPT SUMMARY 4 TR.ANSACTION NUMBER: T9301051 DATE: 06/28/93 APPLICANT: AYERS, PAMELA S PHONE= 509 924 3896 ADDRESS: P O BOX 14563 ~ SPOKANE WA 99214-0563 CONTACT NAME: PAMELA S AYERS PHONE= 509 924 3896 TR.ANSACTION: ZONING CHANGE/LAND USE ACTION REVIEW DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) COMMENTS: E 11518 DISHNIAN-MICA FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00 LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00 TOTAL DUE = 220.00 TOTAL PAID= 220.00 BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 06/28/93 00005882 5486 220.00 M PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA THANK YOU 4 Y it.yers Rezone /J.•a,7 3tna r.LV LLi I Hve. CL] . • . . t• ~~f . . ♦ • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • V • ~ . • • . • ~ • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • ,~,`33 217~~ AV E . ' 33 IZt~ /~V6 • . ~ ~ ; : ` • f~••••'••. iw . f~~~ . ~ ~ J' • ' f•_~••~~~~~ ~ ► • ; g3~~ . . 3 4 T1-1 . s : . ~ . • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~~•i ~'~'.~l ~ • ~ •'i to to ~ 'I- ~ Y • ~ ' ' . ~ ~ 34TN ~ . • ~ ~ • ~ ~ .~F • . • . • • ~ Z • ` 35TH AVe- d . ~ ~ Z•• ~L~•'•'•'~-~-~-~ ~ ~ , .3 • ' W' : ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ J' j• ~ NULA ~ f 5 ;a ~ ~ " > • t7 ~ ~ ~LONA 0 r i'r ' = ~ a , t . . r . . : -r-:-r~ c.T o : • • ° - ~g ~n. 35TH . ~ ~ - - % 3CoTH • /1VE . f ~ ~ ~ • • • C ~ 37 Tµ ; W t J 3'7T H p ~ AV E ~ ; ~ ~ - ~ ' . - . . _ ; ~v • p, SBTN 4i ~ • ~ • , ~ _ , : , , oa,~ . ; _ • 3flc8 ; J ~ F • oTN; ~ N40TH /SVE . . 33 ~ 4. . - _ ',~.w ~ ti s ` . . . : ~ p ' pt 42 L!)C • - ~ • W ~ ,~I~~ 7~ > O ? Cn J W Z 3 C ~ . • sT ' 0 : ,--j ' ~h Or 0 1 1 ~ ~ • ~ 1 / ~ OL 42fl ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ 7 • t ~ ~ ) ' 43fa ° _ _ h = CHESTIat=. ~ . ~o~ fi me ..~EN, ~cEM ~ . 6 t~ . , ~ . . . . • • • • • • • ~ i'~ a ~4 ~ - - ~U' r ` L1 TNG PE 2a ~ 4 - - i - - CK C! W • . 4(oTIJ AvE C~ (X f G t qn • a ~ Z ~ • ~ • . cr. l, = 4TTU ' • • ~ ~ W 4 ! TH qV E /N = ~ ~ Z ~ f~ ' cr. . , . Z 48TLt = 31 ~vu R FEkHET t,/q¢ r~- - r'1...•.•. ~ C ~ ! r• ~1 . ~'7~ii/~ _.a,,, ' ~ ` ~ ~d oa i t~ 0 ~ - ER • / ~ ~ AN RT ouimi w ~ jt:Lk:~i:ci~-.. • I ~ . ~ ,i .O ~ . Ayers / 4, - - . - - - - . - _ ~ h2 : c : ~ 'NOr1 . I , I,, I ~ ~ • 30th . Ave ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ' W ' . . . 3 . k: Tk . V `'1 ~ ~ . L) ~ . W. : L~ • ~ j 31 st . :2. . , W Ave W L` ; ~ ~ - i • ~ • • . J--~ • \c-r V • . . . . . • . d : . - . El: ° ' . . . . . , : ' • - . , . ~ . • ♦ • O . ♦ d .L J• .C•• ~C . z 3~ sT • ~ D 32nd ~ a Ave to~, • f~ ' 3 ~ ~ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~33 rtb~ ~ , ~ L • o ^ ~ ' /~.vE • 3'~ tzm &vS . •r: • - . IJD' . . • . . . . ~I~ Y Zn . ~ . . • ~ o ~ W~:, ,1 G 3~. 34 TN : /avE~. : 't \ ! • i • ~ ~ .~S.:l.• ~ • • L~ - W' 34TH % 35T" d ' . _ nve. c ~ Z . ' '~:3 . . • z ~ ~ : ~~uLn D l7',~ ~i} ~y'&LON/1 GT.0 . . •L. , , ~JO .3STw. ~ CT . ' ?SCcT~ ' /~vE Ul ~ ( I bi' 0~ -j o . . ~ . • ~ ; • 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i 37 TV4 a AV E ✓ . C; • . ~ . . . • a . . • l.a~+s ' ,y,o ~ ~i ~Liu ~U • ~ Z /s ~s xs i : ~ ~ • 3fl T 8 ' ~ • _ • ~ . F 0 H • - - 2 20 • ~ ~ - ~J - , ZD) ~ • ~ ; ~ ~ : 4 d ~ Z ~ > 4 ~ : r CD W Lr W'L` ~ ~ 1 Q • 3 ST 441 N r~ -SS _ 4 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ l . o. . ~ 1 ~ 42 ~ cl ~ ~ - , N s I . qh Z v, r CNESTr-2 -'r 1 r ~ 7EMP • 'fi cLc5ua.E . ~ E rv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . : _ _ . . -rNO vE MO • - - , ~ . c~ + 3 4(pTU AvE ~ ~ , = ^ ~ • ~ : • ~ ~ • u., 0 a 3 Z ~ : < ~ av'f "J r (0 t 0 , cr 47TN ~ w - 4 ! I qV G r 2 v ~ . C . a T . 4 3r a Tw Z; 31ti > „e ._.✓6 •r ` RG1 - ^ ~~...,..~•.L~ • J FtkKtT LR . 41 ~f 1~ 2~ i . a ~ob 3< i 7 yP C" a . 0 ~~9P' Y f ~ p~'Q • ' ~~i F'1 an•~ ' ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ' I ' ~i ~ i!+., _~,y1- - - . . ~ ^VF . , ~ r ~ , • M',!~t~'I,. . • < . • ~ O , . ~ ~ • r~- - ~ i 4oTH AVENVE ~ - - -T - - ~ \l t II N O II 0 ~ II 'IarM ERLv CIRCLE RM52 X suNOOwN--- ZONE A6 I N a cn ~ a , ( 44TH AVENUE T. 25 N. T. 24 N. ZONE C ~ W F- Q m N ~ A O J Z RM53 Q a A Farm Road ~ 20157f I I G~ 2016 / t ~ 36TH AVE ~ • • I ;"THI A~NU~ 1 t 0 0 cc 40TH AV~NU~r I- I I N 0 ~ , ~9~y~' 'r • 'J~ ' i . ~ir:'~': l, ~ ' ~ .r; ~TM EftLY - CIRCLE R N152 . X suNOoW~`*, '.3. I Z O N E A6 2 i ~ 41 ' N . T. 2~3 N. ' A.4TH AVEI+IUE f` T. 2~ N. ~ . ~ ~ ZpNE C ✓i 1. / , ~ ~ - ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ti ~ r i . t ~ N~' ~y (r~r~ ` ~~fYP ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~~f ~ i ~ ~ •,O _ ~ ~ ~ r aA r ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ Y 4 r ` ~ ~ ~ ! r ' ~ 1 a. r ~ ~ p~ uS~~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ 1 ~ . } ~ ~ q~ r r F, ~ Y~ 4~ / Mu ~ T ! . (~rC's~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r Ls~I~~~ . ~ • + r~'~E . i ~ . ~ + ~ ~ q ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~e 1 ~ F - ~ _ x t~ r ~V~ ~ s y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ` ~ y ~ 1~ ± ~~Gl~~. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , xti , ~ ti 1~ ,r b ~ ~ i I I! / i 1 ~ ~ j ~ F e . i ~ r"' ` ~ { ` i 1 f { Gr ~ y r f ~ L~~d~~~~~~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ` ~ r ~fo~n~t ~ ' I~ c V+~L~1 s~~ , i.4 ~ I~I~ ; _ o ` ~ ~ ' ~f~. ~~Fl~~r~+ ~ J+V ` _ ? L',3` ~ ~ M1 i ~ ~ F~ 4~{/'~ r.~ ,q ~ ! _f ~ r ~ „ ~ y,,~ _ + M1 ~ rl ~ ~ ' ~ k r~~V~lf ~ ` w- ~ Y' f~ l ~7 , , , ~ ~ -~r-- ~ ~ , ~ti~ , ~ , i ' ' ' ' ~ ' r - R ~ It. I , s , ~ r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ; ~10~D~4~~~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ~~1 ~ ~ - - - ~ I ~ 1 ►.xJ r F ~ . . y ~'.M I~ ~ ti 1 + ~ i e + ~ ~ I . F ` ~ } ~ ~ ~ i f ~ ) 'Y ~ 5 1 ~ ~ ~ I . ~ ~ - ' ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~.~T ~ ~ ~ ~s.ov f - o ~ ~ . ~rt + ~ a~ ~ - - - _ , i ~ ! ~ ` ~ , ~ - , , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 5. I r41 r ~w ~ ~ At ( ~ ' y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt ~ ~ r ~ s~ q. ra a 1 iF iw ~ r~4 ~r 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 4 ~ . ~ I~ ~ + ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~ • ~ ~1 ~ ~ y ~ { ~ L~ + ~ LL ~ ( ~ i _ ~ ~ ~ ( F , ~ . .~-Q~~ F.~ . , .i ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ 4 ~ , ; , , ~ ` _V ~ ~ ~ y , ~ II ~ Qf ~ ` ~ , ~ ~I j ~ ~ I ` `r I ~ 3 ~ i ' I ~ a w r~ sl~ E T we R+4 w ~ ~ a~r ~ • ~ ~ 1~ ~ , ~ I I FI I H ~ ~ ~ r a , 5 ~ ~ ~ r - . ~ y M1 . - ~ ' ~ / I ~ ~ w ~ J T ~ ~ ayy.wrwyM. . x -~~ra. - , - . 3 1 l ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m x J x u - ~ 4 ,mm, f i ~ £ { a F e A ~ a ~t ~ ~ . .w N~:. f „ ~w. ' tlNu ~ m. e ~ , w . q.: 44 4 l ~ 5 i .HN ~ m'- o s. q ~ ~ ri ti ~ ~ ro 3'~ 4 ~ d i 9 6 ' ~ ~ « r ow TM a t ~ 1 _ ~ ~ . . . . .