ZE-036-96
,
~ RIECEMM
r
1 : 1996
sFOKANE coUNTY g~ARING EXAIVIvER
I1rty Engineering
RE : Zone Reclassification from Urban } FINDINGS OF FACT,
Resideritiai-3.5 (UR-3.5) to } CUNCLUSIONS AND
Urban Residential-22 {IJR-22} ) DECxSION
)
Applicant: Arger Capital Corpoaration } Fiie No. ZE-36-96
1. SUM11riARY OF PROFQSAL AND DECISYON
Proposal: ,Zone reclassificatian from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone for 40 multiple-family dwellings, with bonus density.
Decision: Apprawal of the zone reclassificativn to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone,
subject to a reduction in the net residentiai density of the propasal ta allow a maxirnum of 34
muitipie-family dwelling units. The request for bonus density is denied.
II. FINI)INGS UF FACT AND CUNCLUSiaNS
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zane reclassification and bonus density
applications and the evidence of recard, and hereby adopts the fallowing findings of fact and
conclusions:
A. GENERAL INFORLMATI(3N:
Applicant: Arger Capital CQrporation, 300 1`+(orth Muilan Roa+d, 9244, Spakane, WA 99246
.Address: None assigned.
Location: Generally Iocated north of and adjacent to 4"' Avenue, apprax.imately 300 feet west
of Evergreen Road in the NE '/a of Section 22, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
Gounty, Washingtan.
Legal Deseription: The north 290.68 feet of the west 165 feet of the east 495 feet of the NE 1/4
of the 1`TE 'ld Qf CM ST R& P RR R1W except the nQrth 105 feet. TaGET'HER WITH the west
165 feet of the east 495 feet of the NE 'l4 vf the NE 1/4Qf CM ST P& P RR R/WW except the south
20 feet and exeept the north 290.68 feet more or less_
Zoni,ncy: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5).
+Cvmprehensive Plan Category: The praperty is designated in the Urban categary of the
Spokan+e County Ceneralized Comprehensive Plan.
HE Findinas, Conclusians and Decision ZE-3 6-96 Page 1
/
~
Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on October 17,
1996 by the Division of Building and Planning.
Site Description: The site is approximately 1.82 acres in size, and relatively flat. The
property is rectangular-shaped, being 165 feet wide along Fourth Avenue and 480 feet long from
north to south. The site is vegetated with native grasses and weeds. The net density of the
proposal, after the dedication of right of way is 1.78 acres.
Surrounding Conditions: The site fronts along the north side of Fourth Avenue, and is
situated about 300 feet west of Evergreen Road and four blocks south of Spragve Avenue.
Fourth Avenue is designated as a 70 foot wide Collector Arterial on the Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan, and Evergreen Road and Sprague Avenue are designated as Principal Arterials.
McDonald Road, located about half a mile west of the site, is designated as a Minor Arterial.
Evergreen Road south of Sprague Avenue is a two-lane road, and Fourth Avenue is a two-lane
road with an existing right of way width of 40 feet. A new freeway interchange is being planned
at Evergreen Road and Interstate 90, to facilitate access to a new regional shopping mall that is
currently under construction north of Interstate 90. Spokane County has plans to widen
Evergreen Road from Interstate 90 south to Sprague Avenue within the next few years.
Approximately 100 feet south of the site is an abandoned railroad right of way that has been
dedicated to Spokane County. The right of way extends east and west parallel to Sprague
Avenue for a considerable distance, midway between Fourth Avenue and Sprague Avenue.
Spokane County has installed a public sewer interceptor in the abandoned right of way, and is
considering a long range plan to extend a new east-west traf~ic arterial in such right of way.
South of Sprague Avenue, the right of way provides the dividing line between a) the Major
Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan and commercial uses to the north, and b) the
Urban category and residential uses to the south.
Land uses in the vicinity consist primarily of single-family residences, with some vacant land
located immediately east, west and north of the site. Between the site and Evergreen Road, at the
northwest corner of Evergreen Road and Fourth Avenue, is a vacant 3.75 acre parcel zoned
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22). Development of such parcel is contingent on the submittal of a
detailed site plan for review and approval at a public hearing before the County Hearing
Examiner, pursuant to the conditions of approval of the 1981 rezone of such parcel for
multifamily development (Division of Building and Planning File No. ZE-88-80). The vacant land
located immediately north and west of the site is zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Further
west along the north side of Fourth Avenue, and along the south side of Fourth Avenue west of
Evergreen Road, the land is developed with single-family residences on land zoned UR-3.5.
The area south of Fourth Avenue is dominated by single-family residences on land zoned UR-3.5.
In December, 1995) the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor approved a conditional use pernut for a
home industry (dance studio) on a single-family lot located along the south side of Fourth
Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of the site (Division of Building and Planning File No.
CUE-22-95). Mamer Road, between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue, was vacated a number of
years ago. Keystone Elementary School is found at the southwest corner of McDonald Road and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 2
.
Fourth Avenue and multi-fa.mily housing is found along the west side of McDonald Road
immediately north of Fourth Avenue
Intensive commercial development is found along Sprague Avenue to the north with commercial
uses and Reglonat Business (B-3) zoning typically extending south from Sprague Avenue to the
abandoned raalroad nght Qf way A relatively new Target retail store is found at the southwest
corner of Evergreen and Sprague Avenue, and a new Safeway store and other retail uses are
found at the southeast corner of such artenals The nearest County park is located about a rrule
south of the site near Evergreen Road and 24~' Avenue
Project T3escription The site plan dated August 6 1996 dlustrates two buildings
onented north and south along the west border of the site contairung a total of 44 multiple-family
unrts Space for 40 garages placed pnmanly along the east border of the site, 10 spaces for
recreational vehicles along the north border and 32 spaces for cars along the east side of the
proposed burldings are also shown A single access to Fourth Avenue is tndicated at the sautheast
corner of the site Required landscaping is shown along the north south and west borders vf the
site and required fenctng is indicated along the north and west borders The County Division of
Building and Planrung has recommended that the height of the buildings on the site be limlted to
3 5 feet
The site will be served by pubilc sewer and the applicant must subrrut a dra.inage plan far
approval by County Engineenng The applicant is requesting one unit of bonus density in the
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone based on direct connection of the proJect to public sewer
The net density of the proposal is 22 5 umts per acre The applicant is required to unprove Fourth
Avenue aiong the frontage of the site by adding 8-10 feet of paving and curb and sidewalk
County Engineenng will require the applicant to dedicate 2 5 feet af nght of way and reserve 12 5
feet of additional future acqursition area along Fourth Avenue The applicant is also required to
negotiate a votuntary impact fee agreement wrth the Central Valley School Distnct to mitigate the
impact of the propasal on schools
B PR4CEDURAL IlNFORNIATIOrd
Appticable Zoning Regulations Spokane County Zorung Code Chapters 14 402, 14 622 and
14820
Hearing Date and Location November 13 1996 Spokane County PublFC Works Building
Lower Level CommissiQners Assembly Room 1026 West Broadway Spokane WA
Notices Mailed Qctober 24 1996 by applicant
Posted October 24 1996 by applicant
Pubhshed October 25 1996
Compliance The Iega1 requirements for public notice have been met
Site Viset Before and after public heanng In addrtion to visrting the srte, the Heanng
Examiner drove the length of Fourth Avenue between Pines Road and Sullivan Road and also
HE Findings Concluslons and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 3
O
1
viewed the applicant s Cypress Point multifanvly development located along McDonald Road
south of iVhssion Avenue
Hearang Procedure Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Exa.miner Rules of Procedure)
Testimony
John Pederson, Servor Planner and Tammy Jones, Planner II
Division of Building and Planivng
1026 West Broadway
Spokane WA 99260-0240
Pat Harper Prokey Arger and Greg Arger
Division of Engineering and Roads 300 North Mullan Road
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99206
Spokane, WA 99260
Mike Johnson Karen Cone
13907 East 4`hAvenue 13620 East 3`dAvenue
Spokane WA 99216 Spokane WA 99216
Darrell Klein Dean Larson
13811 East 5`hCourt 13615 East 3'dAvenue
Spokane WA 99216 Spokane WA 99216
Farrell Summers Susan Mathis
13718 East 4`hAvenue 13614 East 3`d Avenue
Spokane WA 99216 Spokane WA 99216
Helen Foge
13 817 East 5`hAvenue
Spokane, WA 99216
gtems Noticed Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zorung Code,
Spokane County Code, Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0294, Spokane County
Artenal Road Plan Maps, and Spokane County Road Standards adopted by County Resolution
No 95-0498 Also Spokane County Zomng Adjustor Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision
in Division of Building and Planrung File No CUE-22-95, dated December 28, 1995 and Heanng
Exanuner Committee Findings and Order in Division of Bwlding and Planrung File No ZE-88-80,
dated October 14, 1981
C ZONE RECI,ASSIFICA'I'ION AIa1ALYSIS
To be approved the proposed zone reclassification must comply with the cntena for
amending the Official County Zoning Code Map particularly paragraphs (1) and (2) of Spokane
County Zoning Code Section 14 402 020, and the requirements established under Washulgton
case law for the approval of rezones The proposal must also satisfy the requirements of the
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, other related provisions of the County Zorung Code and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Deciston ZE-36-96 Page 4
other applicable land use regulatlons Finally, the proposed rezone must be consistent with the
State Environmental Policy Act and Chapter 1 I 10 of the Spakane County Code
In considet-ing a rezone application, Washingtan case law generally provides that (1) there is
no presumption m favvr of the rezane (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantiaily changed 1n the area since the last zoning of the property and (3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the pubtic health, safety or wetfare Parkndee v
Seattle 98 Wn 2d 454 462 (1978) Btarnson v Kitsap County, 78 Wn App 840 (1995)
The following findings of fact and conclusions are made
1 As cvnditioned bv the Heannia Examiner, the oroposed zone reclassification iaenerallv
conforms to the Sookane Countv Genera.hzed Comorehensive Plan
A county s comprehensrve plan provides guidance to the hearuig body in making a rezone
decrsion Belcher v ICitsao Countv 60 Wn App 949, 953 (1991) Deviation from a
comprehensive pIan does not necessanly render a rezone illegal The plan is considered as a
general bluepnnt and only general conformance with such plan is requued Bassani v Countv
Commiss2oners 70 Wn App 389 396 (1993), Cathcart v Snohonush Countv, 96 Wn Zd 201
212 (1981) See also Zorung Cvde 14 402 020 (1)
The Building and Planrung Division Staff Report found that the applicatian was generally
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Camprehensive Plan for this srte is Urban The
Urban' categvry is tntended to provlde the opporturuty for deWelopment of a"citylike'
environment which includes vanous land uses and intensive residential development served by a
high levei of public facilities and services (paved roads pubIic sewer and water, storm water
systems police and fire protection and other features) It is pnmanly a residential category of
single-fa.nuly two-family, multifamily and condomuruum buildings along with some
nerghborhood cornmercial light mdustnal uses, and public and recreational facilities The Urban
category allows a vast range of residentlal densities from one unit per acre to 17 units per acre
The category promotes the concept that single-fa.mily uses will be isolated from the noise and
heavy traffic while the more intensive uses such as light industnal and neighborhood commercial
will be located near the heavily traveled streets Multifanuly uses will usually be a transitional use
located between single-family residential and #he more intensive uses of the Urban category
There are four residential zoning classifications which implement the Urban category The
least intensive is the current zorung designatron for the site UR-3 5 It allows densrties of 3 5
units per acre the typical density for single-family residential subdivision in the area
The applicant seeks a zone reclassification to the UR-22 zone which allows a densrty of 22
uruts per acre even more than the 17 units per acre generally provided for in the Urban category
The Urban category however, indicates that the base net density for multifamily dwellings areas
may be increased through bonus options" or "bonus densities' within developed areas where
utilities artenals, schools, and community facilities have a.lready been estabhshed Urban
category, Decision Guideline 1 12 Zoning Code Chapter 14 820 authonzes "bonus densities'
for muttifamily housing in excess of 22 uruts per acre in the UR-22 zone, under certain
HE Findings Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 5
~
circumstances and conditions Besides multifamily development the UR-22 category also allows
office uses and other uses more intensive than single farrvly Zorung Code 14 622 100 Chapter
14 605
As to the proper location of Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zones in the Urban category, the
purpose and intent section of the UR-22 zone states
The highest density residential zone, UR-22 is intended pnmanly for
multiple-farruly dwellings and is usuallv located adiacent to maior or
secondarv artenals It is used as a transition between low or medium
density multiple uses and intensive commercial or low intensity industnal
uses and to provide for tugher density housing in locations close to
employment shopping and maJor transportation routes where movements
of people can be handled efficiently and wnth least overall adverse impact
[Emphasis added]
Zorung Code 14 622 100 "Major or secondary artenals" as referenced above equates to
roads classified as a Pnncipal Artenal or Niinor Artenal under the Spokane County Artenal Road
Plan, but does not include roads classified as a Collector Artenal See Comprehensive Plan,
Glossary, defirvtions of "Secondary Artenal',"Major Artenal and ` CoUector Artenal", Zorung
Code 14 300 100, defimtion of "Artenals-Pnncipal, Minor and Coilector', Zorung Code
14 710 140 and Spokane County Road Standards Section 1 12, paragraph 2 Objective 1 1 b of
the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan more generally provides that higher-density
developments such as multifarruly dwelling areas should be located with near or direct access
to the major artenal systems rather than on intenor neighborhood streets"
Fourth Avenue is designated by the Artenal Road Plan as a Collector Artenal However, the
proposal is located only 300 feet from Evergreen Road, a Pnncipal Artenal, and is closer to
Evergreen Road than it is to Leatha Lane the closest neighborhood street to the site by motor
vehicle It is also noted that the land situated between the site and Evergreen Road is zoned UR-
22 and is likely to be developed for multifamily housing Further consistent vvith a stated purpose
of the UR-22 zone the proposal provldes a transition from the single-farruly residences located
south of Fourth Avenue to the intensive commercial uses located along Sprague Avenue and to
the nearby nght of way dedicated to the County The site is also located close to employment
shopping and the major transportation routes
Exlubit A in the record, subrrutted at the public heanng by area residents opposed to the
project, shows the approximate location of multifamily complexes either existing or under
construction in the general area, as well as whether the complex is under or over 50 units in sue
The exhibit establishes that most multifanuly complexes in the general area of the site are located
either along a Pnncipal Artenal (Pines Road Sullivan Road Broadway Avenue) or a Niinor
Arterial (McDonald Road Mission Avenue Adams Road) However, the map shows an existing
multifarrvly complex of less than 50 uruts located along the north side of Fourth Avenue, at some
distance west of McDonald Road (tlus complex is in addition to the complex located at the
northwest corner of McDonald Road and Fourth Avenue) Exhibit A does not accurately depict
the location of this complex, which is actually located rrudway between Pines Road and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 6
f
McDonald Road, between Vercler Road and Leta Road extended north Wlule the complex is in
good condition it is unknown when the compleY was constructed or zoned for multifamily
development There are also a number of large multifarruly complexes either existing or under
construction lirung both sides of Fourth Avenue east of Sulllvan Road for several hundred feet
The applicant contended that the proposal is consistent unth other development along Fourth
Avenue but was not specific in ttus regard Most development located along Fourth Avenue is
single-famlly The Hearing Examiner does not find the multifarrnly development along Fourth
Avenue east of Sullivan Road that comparable to the proposal Sullivan Road is a four-lane
Pnncipal Artenal for a considerable distance south of Sprague Avenue and cames considerably
more traffic than does Evergreen Road at the current time
The major concern with the proposal is its potential for adverse impacts to the single-family
homes located along Fourth Avenue, and to the residential neighborhood located west of the site
Objective 1 1 b of the Urban category indicates that when multifam.ily housing is located adjacent
to single-family areas careful consideration must be given to the density and designs of the
multiple-farruly development so as to ensure protection of the amemties of the single-fanuly area
The applicant testified that the project was designed to target retired seruor citizens (55 and
older) and that there was a strong market for such housing in the Spokane Valley The record
indicates that the proposed 40 urvts of elderly housing would only introduce an additional four
vetucle tnps per hour dunng the peak traffic hours duruig the weekday See testimony of Pat
Harper County Engineenng, letter dated August 6, 1996 from J R Bonnet Englneenrig These
estimated totals would nse to 18 tnps per a m peak hour and 20 tnps per p m peak hour if the
project was marketed for 40 uruts of general population housing
Area residents quoted County traffic figures indicating that the average vehicle tnps per day
along Evergreen Road and Fourth Avenue had nsen markedly in 1995 and 1996 and attnbuted
such increases to the construction of the new Safeway and Target store and other development m
the area Testimony was also offered that a number of accidents had occurred at the intersections
of Evergreen Road with Eighth Avenue and Fourth Avenue However County Englneenng staff
testified that deternunation of the adequacy of county roads and county road intersections was
properly based on the peak hour velucle tnps generated dunng peak hour traffic and not vehicle
tnps per day and expressed the opirvon that roads in the vicimty of the proposal could adequately
handle the additional traffic from the proJect in terms of capacity and safety The opuvons by
qualified professionals on technical issues such as traffic safety and capacity of roadways must be
given weight over the unqualified opinlons of lay persons in ttus instance The Heanng Examiner
finds that the proposal will not degrade area streets and intersections to a level that requires
additional traffic rnitigation by the applicant However, it is apparent that the proposal will
materially increase traffic along Fourth Avenue and possibty on neighborhood streets in the
victnity particularly if the umts in the proposal end up being marketed to the general housing
population
Area residents also eYpressed concern wnth regard to the proposed height and number of uruts
in the proposal particularly if the adjacent land east of the site zoned UR-22 and the vacant land
west of the site are developed for dense multifamily housing Decision Guidelines 1 5 7 and 1 5 8
of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan indicate that the structure height of multifamily
HE Ftndings Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 7
~
housing in relation to the structure height of nearby structures should be considered before
approving any multifamily housing, as well as whether new structures will negatively impact a
neighborhood s architectural character The single-family residences lirung Fourth Avenue west
of Evergreen Road are generalty single-story structures However, there is approxunately 165
feet of vacant land between the site and the single-famtly residences Iocated west of the site on the
north side of Faurth Avenue Further the Division of Budding and Planrung conditions of
approval linut the budding height of the proposal to 35 feet The Zorung Code generaUy measures
building height from the "average firushed grade to the highest point of the roof, except for
skylights chimneys a.nd other exceptions See Zoning Code 14 300 100 defirvtion of building
height and ?orung Code 14 810 120 The applicant testified that due to the placement of a
berm the actual helght of the roof of the proposal would vary from 3540 feet The 35 foot
helght restnction cvmpares to the maximum allowable building heights in the UR-3 5 UR-7,
UR- 12 and UR-22 zones which are respectively 3 5 feet, 40 feet and 50 feet Spokane County
Zomng Code
The visual impact of a multifamily buildmg also depends on the size and profile of the buflding
other than its height The alignment of the buildings on the site from north to south and the
narrowness of the lot does help mitigate the visual unpact of the proposal when viewed from the
south, although not necessanly fram the west However there is concern about the densrty of the
proposal The appticant indicated that plans were being made to develop 80 uruts of multifamily
housing on the 3 75 acre parcel zoned UR-221ocated adjacent to the site at the northwest corner
of Evergreen Road and Fourth Avenue which equals to a density of over 21 ututs per acre
Further there is potential for multifa.mily development af the vacant land located adjacent to the
site on the west, land wh.tch the applicant has expressed an interest in acquinng See
Envuonmental Checklist, p 1 The record does not indicate any opposition to the proposal from
the owner of the vacant land to the west
If the proposal and the adjacent sites to the east and west were all developed at the density
allowed in the UR.-22 zone, the single-family neighborhood in the vicinity could be overwhelmed
It is the opiruan of the Heanng Examiner that s4me transition is needed along Fourth Avenue
between the property zoned UR.-22 located at the corner of Evergreen Road and FQUrth Avenue
and the srngle-family residences located west and south vf the site zoned Urban Residential-3 5
(UR-3 5) Such transition could be provided by the Urban Residentfal- 12 zone, wh.ich like the
LTR-22 zone is frequently used to provide transltion between low-density residential zones and
intensive business zones Zorung Code 14 624 100 However, the proxinuty of Regivnal
Business (B-3) uses and the Sprague Avenue busaness distnct to the s1te, the nearness of
Evergreen Road, and the probable marketing of the site for elderly housing convinces the Heanng
Examiner that UR-22 zorung is appropnate for the site but at a reduced density Restncting the
net density of the proposal to a density that is trudway between the maximum allowable net
density in the UR-22 zone with bonus density (27 uruts per acre) and the maximum allowable
density in the UR-12 zone {12 uruts per aere} seems a reasonable comprornise under the
ctrcumstances Such reduced density would allow the applicant 34 multlple-fa.mily dwelling units
instead of the 44 uruts requested Depending on the circumstances, the vacant land located west
of the site could be rezoned to the LTR-12 zone or LTR-7 zone to provide further transition to the
adjacent single-family neighborhood
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 8
2 Conditions in the area in wtuch the oropertv ls located have not sufficientlv changed to iustifv
the oroDosed rezone. as conditioned
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property rtself The Zorung Code references changes in "econorruc,
technological or land use condrtions" as factors that will support a rezone Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 14 402 020 (2) Washington courts have not required a"strong" shownng
of change The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts Bassarv v Countv
Commissioners 70 Wn App 389, 394 (1993) Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone unplements policies of a
comprehensive plan Biarnson at 846 Save Our Rural Envlronment v Snohomish Countv, 99
Wn 2d 363 370-371 (1983)
Some changed cucumstances have occurred in the area since adoption of the Zorung Code
in 1986, and re-designation of the zorung of ihe site to the Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) zone
of the Zorung Code in 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zorung
Code Such changes include increased traffic in the viciruty and population growth in the area,
intensive commercial development south of Sprague Avenue m the viciruty, and the extension of
public sewer to the area
3 The vronosed rezone bears a substantial relationship to and is not detnmental to the oublic
health. safetv and eeneral welfare
General consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in deternurung
whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare Bassaru, at 396-98 As
conditioned the proposal generally confonns to the Comprehensive Plan The site is adequately
buffered from the nearby single-family neighborhood based on its design, location, restncted
height reduced density and landscaping and screerung features Wlule neighbonng property
owners introduced evidence that there is a considerable supply of new and existing multifanuly
housing in the general area of the proposal, the unrebutted testimony of the applicant is that there
is a market for elderly housing in the area The proposal provides for the extension of curb and
sidewalk along the frontage of the site with Fourth Avenue, in response to the concern expressed
by area residents related to the use of Fourth Avenue by schoolchildren and other pedestnans
The impact of the project on area schools vvill be rrutigated by the ` voluntary" fee agreement that
the applicant must negotaate with the Central Valley School Distnct The proposal is vvithui the
Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Spokane Transit Authonty, with the nearest bus
route being approximately 1/8 of a rrule to the north on Sprague Avenue
There was some discussion in the record as to whether the proposal will be a"gated'
community for secunty purposes The applicant s Cypress Point multifamily proJect along
McDonald Road near 1VLssion Avenue cited for companson has a white picket-type fence placed
around the borders of the front yard of the site While the fence does enhance the residential
appearance of such site, it does not restnct access to the site or make it gated for secunty or
pnvacy purposes hke a planned unit development
HE Findings Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 9
s
4 The Drooosed zone chanee comolies with the provisions of the State Environmental Policv
Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance
No public agencies objected to the Deternunation of Nonsigtuficance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the Division of Building and Planivng The Heanng Examiner finds that as
conditioned the proposal will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the
environment and concurs with issuance of the DNS The procedural requirements of chapter
43 21 C RCW and chapter 11 10 of the Spokane County Code have been met
5 The oroDOSaI. as conditioned, comvlies wnth the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. the
Snokane Countv Zoniniz Code_ and auulicable land use regulations
Except for the application of the bonus density provisions of the Zoning Code, the proposal
complies with the development standards of the UR-22 zone Section 14 820 060 of the Zorung
Code allows bonus densities in the UR-22 zone for up to 27 uruts per acre for direct sacutary
sewer hookup This includes the potential for 3 5 units per acre for direct hook-up to public
sewer 5 uruts per acre for location vvitlun one-quarter mile wallang distance of public transit, 5
units per acre for off-site convenience shopping facilrties that are functionally accessible witlun
walking distance, and 5 uruts per acre for pnmary means of access via an artenal The applicant
applied for 5 uruts per acre bonus density for the proposal, based on direct sewer hook-up to
allow one additional urut on the site The allowance for bonus density must provYde a"desirable
living environment compatible with surrounding land uses' and must not be detnmental to the
public health safety and general welfare Zoning Code 14 820 000 For the reasons discussed
above the Heanng Exa.miner finds that bonus density is not appropnate in tlvs instance and that
the density of the project needs to be reduced
IIY DECISIOIV
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusion above the above zone reclassification is
approved for a maximum density of 34 multi-fanuly dwelling umts vvith derual of the request for
bonus density The applicant shall subrrut a revised site plan for admuvstrative review and
approval by the Division of Building and Planning The design concept for the proposal shall
remain similar to the current proposal allowing for the need to reduce the density of the proposal
This approval is also subject to the conditions of approval of public agencies as stated below
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of tlus
approval by the Heanng Examiner This approval does not waive the apphcant s obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with junsdiction over land development
SPOKANE COZTr1TY I)WYSION OF BUII.I)ING AND P G
1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone as amended
2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept
presented to the Heanng Exarruner, as conditioned by the Heanng Examiner Vanations, when
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 10
approved by the Division Director/designee, may be pernutted including, but not hrruted to
building location landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All vanations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code and the onginal intent
of the development plans shall be maintauied
3 Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and sigrung
plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building pernuts
4 A specific landscape plan planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to
the Division Director/designee shall be submitted vAth a performance bond for the project pnor to
release of building pernvts Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at
access points is not obscured or impaired
5 Direct lighting from any extenor lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
6 The Spokane County Dlvision of Building and Plarunng shall prepare and record vvith the
Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety
of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title
Notice should be recorded wrthin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by
the Spokane County Heanng Exanuner on [ imposing a vanety of special
development conditions File No [ ] is available for inspection and copymg in the
Spokane County Division of Building and Planrung
7 The Spokane County Division of Building and Plan.iung shall prepare and record unth the
County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road nght of way and
utilittes The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released in full or in part, by
the Division The notice should be recorded wnthin the same time frame as an appeal and shall
provide the following
a At least 12 5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght of way and
utilities along Fourth Avenue
b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zomng Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area
c No required landscaping, parlcing, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located wittun the future acquisition area for road nght of way and utilities If any of the
above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's
expense when roadway improvements are made
HE Findincrs Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 11
a
d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be pnvate property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping parking,
surface draunage drainfield signs or others) shall be considered intenm uses
e The property owner shall be respQnsrble for relocating such ` intenm improvements
at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquinng sa;d future
acquisltion area
8 Building height shall be Iuruted to 35 feet The residential density of the site shall be
Irm.ited to a maximum of 34 multlple-fa.mlly units
9 The owner shall negotiate unth Central Valley School Distnct and submtt a recorded copy
of a voluntary agreement ma.king provisions for public schools pnor to issuance of building
pernvts The agreement shall provide a wntten descnption of the subject property to which the
agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to rrutigating measures
Voluntary agreements between the owner and school distnct shall conform to the
requirements of RCW Chapter 82 02
10 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildang and Pla.nrung at the earliest possible
stage in order to be informed of code requirements adrnurustered/enforced ad authonzed by the
State Building Code Act Designldevelopment concerns include Addressing fire apparatus
access rods fire hydrant/flow► approved water systems building accessibilrty construction type
occupancy classification exiting extenor wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note
The Division of Buildrng and Planning reserves the nght to confirm the actual address at the time
of building pernvt )
SPOKANE COIJIVTY DMSION OF ENGYN]EERING AND RQ7►ADS
Pnor to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
Pnor to issuanee of a butlding pernut or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with
a County Road ProJect/Road Improvement Distnct whichever comes first
1 Applicant shall dedicate 2 S feet on Fourth Avenue for nght of way
2 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obta.ined from the
County Engineer
3 Applicant shall subrrut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road draunage and
access plans
4 A parkin~ ptan and traffic circulatlan plan shall be submutted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design 1QCation and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineenng practices Paving or surfactng as approved by the Counfiy Engineer will
be required for any portion of the project which ts to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
HE Findings Conclusions and Declsion ZE-36-96 Page 12
5 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
6 The County Engineer has designated a Collector Artenal Roadway Section for the
improvement of Fourth Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require
the addition of approximately 8-10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing
and sidewalk must also be constructed
7 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bndge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertairung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
8 Access to the South Valley Artenal shall be prohubited until such time as specifically
authonzed by the Spokane County Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requuements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
10 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed nght of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work wntlvn the public road nght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 All required construction wnthin the existing or proposed public nght of way is to be
completed pnor to the release of a buildmg permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or unprovements shall be filed vvith the County
Engineer
12 The County Artenal Road plan identifies Fourth Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Artenal
The existing nght of way width of 20 feet from centerline is not consistent with that specified in
The Plan In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the
required nght of way dedication a stnp of property 12 5 in width along the Fourth Avenue
frontage be set aside in reserve Tlvs property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Artenal Improvements are made to Fourth Avenue
13 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to deternune whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
HE Findings Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 13
SPOKANE COIJN'I'Y D][VgSION OF U'I'ILITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required
2 Applicant shall subrrvt expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department under separate
cover only those plan sheets shownng sewer plans and specifications for Public Sewer
Connections and Facilities for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to
finalization of the project and or the issuance of permit to connect
3 Security shall be deposited wnth the Utilities Department for construction of public sewer
connections and facilities pnor to the finalization of the project and/or the issuance of the pernvt
to connect to the public sewer system
4 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for pnor to
issuance of sewer connection pernvt
4 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
SPOKANE COUNTY HEAI,TH DISTRIC'I'
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system vvill be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each building Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be
authonzed
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
SPOICAIlTE COUN'Y'Y E1IR POLI.BJTIOIV CONT'itOL AU'I'HO1tYTY
1 All air pollution regulations must be met
HE Findings Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 14
DATED this 17th day of December, 1996
S]POI{ANE COUN'TY HEARING EXAMINER
1
Micha~l C Dempsey WSB'-X#k35
NOTICE OF FINAI, DECISIOIV ANID N0TICE OF RIGH'T TO APPEAI.
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Heanng Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
determination is final and conclusive unless wrthin ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
wntten decision a party of record aggneved by such decision fiies an appeal with the Board of
County Comrmssioners of Spokane County, Washington However, RCW 36 70B 110 (9)
indicates that adrrurustrative appeals of county land use dectsions and SEPA appeals shall be filed
with the board of county commissioners wnthin fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the
decision Th.is decision was ma.tled by certified mail to the Applicant on December 17, 1996
Depending on which appeal penod is appticable the appeal closing date is December 27 1996 or
December 31 1996
Appeal procedures are otherwise set forth in County Resolution Nos 96-0632 and 96-0171
and include the payment of an appeal fee of $225 as well as paying for production of a transcnpt and
copies of the official record The Board will hold a closed record heanng Following the closed
record heanng the Board may affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the matter to the Heanng
Examiner
Prior to appeal, the complete proJect file including this decision is avaslable for review at the
office of the Spokane County Heanng Examiner Copies of the file and electronic recording of the
public heanng conducted by the Heanng Exarruner will be made available at the cost provided by
County resolution or ordinance The office hours of the Spokane County Heanng Examiner are
generally Monday through Fnday between the hours of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Following any
appeal the record wlll be filed vvith the Board of County Commissioners and may be inspected at
such office dunng normal business hours
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-36-96 Page 15
3 6 -
~ ~ $
o_
0
-r a ~ ~ AT A `O 2t A
A
1,4
ca ;
~
W `
i ~►`r Al.i- 1
o
° ~
,,.,a.,r. ~ $ ~ ~tt•vTt
I d V, ~
,Eit$1fl~
; -
~
j ct P►V ~ad'n
~
~ v
~ PIV
n pd
6T~ ,
d °t► - ~ m p'~, ~ ,~YN ,rs' !t
~ i K%l
urt
~ 1
y m q
~
~c $
-7 ia
an
4 ~
k~ • I ~
89
OT
,A„1¢b ~ T ~
12 ~H °
1 ~ r •
a ~
E ~3TM A~~ t~ TN ~
•',y _ ~ ~ ~ tl~ .~,~i-r.-l.
~ q • J _ _ ; , _.r -
_-+'----d•~,-`
~ ~,,::r,,,•
~
- - - - - I - - - - - - - - br, - - - - ~ ~ _ - - - - - - - -
+ i
,
4C. _ i ~l'~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~ . _ f ~ ~
~i - - - - ~
P ~ I I
_ ~ • j ^ ~ ~ ~GAAAGE
C%
z r ~ i
6 ti b OA C fi D C
R ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 r ~ S ~ ~ r ~ SM F ~S E ~ ~i }t ~ S~ C ~
~ I t a L.J w 8 U E T » 6 +~a 6 " X C H 0 C
BLDG . II ~ I
0
co
,
Li--
I 1' " -.`\I - - ! r 1_ - ^ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ^ - _ _ _ _ --i•
M '
46 UNIT APAR7MENTS SITE PLAN
sc Lc , . A.
~ c or? p
, ~
~ '~~y
~
c~,
~ATA~00
14
t
p g' ~
U 1
W
ALA! A M
~ A~ ~ VAL
C. xy e
i
0
~ Z
rr Q ~ ~ ~l.Nf~
Y
f.otgl,~~ r ~ ~0 2312 n
r
° ~a a O ~ r . o~"'~~~ ! ' ' 1
~
r ► ,r~q. P `I
~ a
, • ; p ~ ~„'~1~~
aoad~ ~ 7Y~+ - -I
O •
Et
~ ~ 7ZNAV~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! 4 M ~ ~ ~ a'~
O 'y''r
~ o
~
~
~2?. ''p`''~~' ~ , ~ u~, T~~ ~ T
A~ E ,F,..m., , 13 T N
' " ` _ ~Vr►::r•~
~
1 r'
14
- i - I - - - - - - ~ - ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - -t
I I , ,
a C. o oAa.oe aaAoE ~
~ i\~ ` I~~ I I ~ ~ I I I I ! I ~ I IF~ I I I . , I
C I 1 I
,"T
~ I t i I
w I ~ 3 GAMOE I ~ GNUOE { ~ 8~9
---I16) ~
. t Q ~ 0 0 ~ - - - - - - - ~ , - _ f
J i i -1 j(--- „
~ 0 I I L 5 V
^ I ~f i 9 5~ 5 t t y S E. ~ B~ St W C O C C fiD C
' I~ J B h l 5 r9 5 S rD C E ~ (
I
BLDG~ II
U___j Li
~ ° I I
` - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
i
46 UNIT APARTMENTS SITE PLAN
SCALE t o iG
ENGINEER' S REVIEVV SHEE'Y
.AS E3ilILT YC.:1NS RliCM'LL?
REZONE FILE # ZE-036-96
Hearing Date 11 / 13/ 1996 H Time 09:00 AM H# 1 Related File #
Date to Review #
Design Review Date 03/27/ 1996 DR Time 1:15 Design Review # ( DRZE-180-96 )
Date Received 03/ 19/ 1996
Large Lo[s
Project Name UR-3.5 TO UR-22 APT 46 UNITS (2 BLDGS) No. t,ots 0 No. Acres 1.80
Range - Township - Section
SITE ADDRESS N 4TH! W EVERGREEN/E MAIVER PARCEL 45221.91"
Applicant's Name GREG ARGER Phone # 926-5311
Address 300 N MULLANIR RD #204 Phone 2#
SPOKANE WA 99206
FLOOD ZONE No W 4 S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed
Billing Name Owner ARGER CAPITAL CORPOR Engineer CHARLES E SIMPSON
Address Address 300 N MULLAN# RD 1i204 Company SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC.
SPOKANE WA 99206 Address 909 N ARGONNE RD
Signed Phone 925-5311 City SPOKANE,WA 99212
P110nc
Date
Buildinb GontacL 1'ei-soii: i.UKL;NL LAKSH_~SiSTEti'L- DAVENTOKf
Date Submitted Description Init ial s
DATE FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED )ENIED 'PEALED BCC
APPEALED PROJECT APPROVED -ENIED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
. ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
AS BUILT PLANS RECEIVED
DR REZONE FILE # ZE
Related File # ( )
AARD # ( DRZE-180-96 )
Date to Review # ~
Date to AA & DR 03/27/1996 Time 1:15
Date Received 03/19/1996
Project Name UR-3.5 TO UR-22 APT 46 UNITS (2 BLDGS) No. Lots 0 No. Acres 1.80
Range - Township - Section
45221.9199
y 200
SITE ADDRESS N 4THl W EVERGREEN/E MAMER PARCEL '
Applicant's Name GREG ARGER Phone # 926-5311
Address Phone 2# 300 N MULLAND RD #204
SPOKANE WA 99206
FLOOD ZONE No W S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed
Billing Name Owner ARGER CAPITAL CORPOR Engineer CHARLES SIMPSON
Address Address 300 N MULLAND RD #204 Company SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC .
SPOKANE WA 99206 Address 909 N ARGONNE RD
Ciry SPOKANE,WA 99212
Sig,ned
Phone Phone 926-5311 Phone/FAX (509)926-1322 FAX (509)926-13 i
Date ~
Building Contact Person: LORENE LAKSHAS Phone # 456-3675
Date Submitted Description Initials
~
DATE FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTW
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED ~
DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED )ENIED 'PEALED BCC
APPEALED PROJECT APPROVED EMED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE) STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
, ~
z
0
r'~-1 l
~
~5 ~ ✓~~~l.l'.y~ ~ i . ~ ~ Gu ,
Z I
- ~
~ ~ J C7
v~.
.~1
1, .
~~-Q I.~,aC_9~-,~.~,• ~ ~ _ .L~ ~ ~,-~:~--C~.} ~*-r~f'' ~t. ~ ~
r ~ c ~ ` ~ p , ~ ~ • ` + ~ _
~
~ .
• K
r. r~ ~ ~ ~ • _ _ ~11~-1X~~~
C
~
1 ~Q ~ • ` ~ L' ~>ti
<
- - -
_ : - _ ~~.~s~~s►-r. - _ _ _ - - } l~.
. ~ _ - - - ~ .
e .
~ I ( , p
f
~ aa1S \?sa~~ZS2 ~ ` C~~'°"'~
~
c~ - . -
. ~
_ i
~
n
,
( l_
~l -
f
7,al
Mk - -.o
l .
~ - ~ - t,4
'~-Y '~~~l.k:• ~ ~~~~KL/`~ `i'►,i~ r
~ .
UNUA4
-
. Q}
- - - _
~ ~
';1:~'u;c . ~ Q~J~~ ~ - - _ _ _ _ L~ ~ ~
~
` Ir
~ - ~ - - ~ - - - -
V ~
.
~
• - _ /
~
~
a -
IAA
~
i
~
L ~
~~OKAN1G COQJNTY HEARANG EXAMINER
In the Matter Concerning ZE-36-96, Zone Reclassification )
from Urban Residential-3 5(LJR-3 5) to Urban ) NOTICE OF
Residential-22 (UR-22) ) PUBLIC HEARING
)
Applicant Arger Capital Corporation )
TO All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of proposal, as listed
on Spokane County Assessor's records
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ABOVE-
REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW
Hearing Date November 13, 1996 Time 9 00 a m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Waslungton
Proposal Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
and request for bonus density on approximately 18 acres for 40 multi-family residences and those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone
Appflicant/Owner Arger Capital Corporation, 300 N Mullan Road #204, Spokane, WA 99206
Locahon Generally located north of and adjacent to 4' Avenue, approximately 300 feet west of
Evergreen Road in the northeast '/4 of Section 22, Townshlp 25 N, Range 44 E W M, Spokane County,
Waslungton
Zoning Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
Comprehensive P➢an Urban
Environmental Determinahoo (SEPA) A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issued The
Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency The official comment period ends November 11,
1996
Related Permits Not Included an Application Not applicable
Diviseon of Buildang & Planoeog Staff Person Planner II 509-456-2205
TAoq m so N E S
~ .
2~-S.3696
.
A'`d ~ tA4
~a
co
° ~ d
~ j
4 Q •~3
j ~ t p,,`/ ~ ~ oN
dop
~ x ~ ~d1410~
tK us A•V~ ~
.
' ~Eft`.,'tO
O o --j"~"►
~d 400
1
• t` ~ V ~
II "4*% 4d- t
. ~ ' • ~ ~ +A t-7w
, c T~
:Q
~ Urt ~ a.d nY,
' ~ ~o► Q N ~ ~
~ r
? T"
~ ~
4
7 t
~
8~H p,dE
T M Q. ~ ~ d TM ~
P.v
I ~2 3?H
~
J ~
~
1 ~ H Ad
~ page 1
~ „t d
g
t _
36 or
I1 ZE -9
eart f
^1_ ,'9b ,~E S~f R P
V
~
~ ~
~ " ' ~
~ ~i
~
t$n
. . .
~
Or.
'JAI-~-
'n ~a tr g'
Q 1►)R"22 Y ~ ~Y - q ~ ~
cit it
, r• ~ a r v ~'a
~ ;UR
8 ~ ~ ~ $ _ o 'Z3tZ • ►
~ ~ - OVIL
°11-~
s f ust
~'J't ~
y p - ' ~ f ~
( pC ►
~ Y~1~ yR ~ ~ TM
'J
q t.1, o►''~ E ~ s~,d.t
;At
to Rd . YH
~T"' r 7
~ ~
qlar
-
Nt
t►~ ~►VLIE°' $ 7 tN r- sl -
el w
~ i„ : Q o►
TEMP
1 Av
'TM ~ O
h
~ ~ 12 T 1,c~ ~
2 ja
!~T~ 4D sr
jej ~i ~O
i
a....►~"' f? 14t 6.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;:--r:r~ s^~~ ~
page
s
~ - ort far 7'E"36-96
St~ ~Gp
1~,-13-96i1
rwE0~6,.96
oo ~~l vv ---y===+ ` ~ I~
~ ` = g
10
~ 9 ~ - - -
~
, 'S • O ~ ~ T~ ~ I Y ~ !
TratM Bo~
PArlt
. ~ e aCS -Z. ~7
~ T O
, Perk.. 4~_.-~ I p~ IP ~
a a
awmit
~
~ - - • . ~ -
jy n~ssioir $polta e V61 pvB 1~
o
F epp~rt re
-o... ~ ~ _ X~ ` p ~ • ~ Q j
. • ~ ~ , q ~
f ~=~r' WT ~ I ~ ~ If 0
~ A
Sd
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
p 'iMUe
~ 16 1 ~ ~ . ~
~ _ * y ~►en - i
1 4 t
~ ~ 1 r
~ ..t'-~ ~ rr
VA`c~r ~ Wav
RO?6 ~ .SII~Ete A - ~
PPOR~'WIT
r`-
RC
~'O~~bewa ~ ~ ~A ug AvE P_11L,~ s uaMa
~
, C Potsv
~ a
' r$ ' ~p0p„~ rT
~ s1M 1~Y~[ m0~b ~ W 1 ~ ~ ~
, i L ~ • 8 a ~
, r _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ell ~ o; °
T I ~ , q lOI.1 W - Adama
~ 21 I a,I d 22 4v[
I 2~0 ~ ~ ~ ~S A ~ j ~JF~~~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ J ~~I. ~
' ► ~ 4
~
L 2S
~ . - -
f21N . ~ •WCVAM ,i 'Ji n ~p r :s~eo
•b ~ •
I • - _ ~ ~ 2060 - 7 ~
, t r ~ ~ ~ ~
00Well
o .a
WT JO4 ' N H! DowN
.J ! ; • C ~
' ►er..~ TheP~Aes . .evE p ~ ~ ~ Weti~ ►etN wvC -
• iaeo °~r
0 0 A h
rni
~
f ~ ~ ~ ~ 2•
~ ~ - • ~ ~,r. Z . ~ 0 0- -Q t
4
J
r t ~ a~ ! i a~ a
-say Qei q TQrrDta Vies{ sek PEIk ~ It o,-- ' 7 s4
T
•r2V ~ - ~ y~~~ w
I
~P
WeiG ' • ~ ~ ' _ f
11- l 3-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 3
~~."D 6=96 ~
- _ ---T c , ~ ~
__"~~•'1_~~-~~:A~:~: fl~f~P~••
r,~ - 4 m 0 ~~4'l( z o 0 9~.o we
e ~ '
~ I ~b ' ~ 1 ► iooo t . , 11 ~
W T~►
I' l 2lOt~,
9 NAL . eorrow x ~
NAr~O pie I
Ttar k' n 5PKANE
~ ~ 4Nr~R ~ I
.
"
N
~ n
l ~
I f . ~ ~ TH~RN~ a~ I
1 Park ~ 0 ~noW~=-.__ <
MISC9C~ ~ N_
_ ~ ..ek~ - -
-MIssOoN ~ ~ Spoka e Yall
.r r Ho~ i
N ~ ~
'
W: IiJL ?OS `
~
21 ♦ ~ ~ I
' 800NE ,-4. A VE T.I ? z ~.~y; I
z
VVT
qtko sc,~
16 North Pinee ~roqrese
Y~ I ~ b
• Jr HittA Sefi ~e~
aa
~ ~ - - _ _ i ?Gsp W ~
VALLltY WAr YALLSY ;
at
~ - ~ `~OPPORTU~TIT~~-3-
~~'M /.9L
- s~-- •f ' O O~~ m ~F/~~ ~
~AtS
¢
~
9eh ~
w-
C O I
1011
O
, ~ co~~c To~ ~3, • o
;n ~~s~'~'e~ - ~ 2020
s h
~3 ~ 0
~a a I ~ ;
r9~~ or C"15.. - , i
pesstb~Mes - ' - I
p ~ 2020 a°'
2S
r - 1 ~ u ~ ~ • r _ ~ `
~lL
~ _wbo ~ rk
weu
.~o ~ l~ ~ _ I[ o f-4
Job. kic nooaia 16~
~ 1 ~ Th - - 2001 ~oa~ I i
ew .~r -C
~
r~f + J \ ~ f ` ~ •
i rr o
L,J/~ ~ - - - ~ ~
.
~ ~o
~
--'~rr~ eQ, terra VleW •
~-°1l~l-P ~04 1 1 y P8~~. ~
- f~Reh 'c'l'
~f7 • r I W@I) Ga 207N .
dr ~
z a ~ ~ Page 4
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96
J04
S a~~d
o .
Z - I
70h
tI.9l
i
~
~ ~ Q~ h ~ , '~~ie~= 'G y.• Lx~ i
m
m
I
'C~ - ..1 C~ ~ ~i8~1~~
~
~-~NU*
i ~ ~ r~ ~ r _ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
d r ~
s`
t iT'm''(S~t7 1 t~,.~ j ~ ~~y~rf•we+t~~~~ r~~'~
onn ~ - ~ ~
~ m tp ~m
~ c~
--1
"o'
1-6
~
~ ~ - x ~ ► - ~ r - '
~ I ~ 43 r
~ ~ ~ Q
~t
It zir F ~
~r CD 4
g' ~
~ 'C ~ ` L•+~ , ~
~
RCHITECTS
, _-4Ph AVt-rJtl~ wYA SS~Cl~ ..rES F, S
A
~t , Al''ID AIA , . '
.19VO
eFor
oxi -ve
w P ~ ~ • y.r' ~ • A-mom
SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WOR{S I)EPARTIiREN'I'
DIVISION OF BLJILI)ING AND PL,ANNING 12EPORT
TO SPOKANE COUNTY HEAIZING EXANIINEIt
FROIVY CUR2ENT PLANNING SECTION
DA'TE NOVEIVIBER 13, 1996
SUBJECT ZE-36-96 ZONE RECI,ASSIFICATIOIV F'ROM URBAN
RESII)ENTIAL-3 5 (iJR-3 5) TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL-22 (Uit-
22)
I GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant Arger Capital Corporation
300 N Mullan Road #204
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 926-5311
Contact Plannea- Steve Davenport
Location Generally located north of and adjacent to 4`h Avenue, approximately
300 feet west of Evergreen Road in the NE '/4 of Section 22, Township 25 N,
Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Proposal Zone Reclassification frorn Urban Residential-3 5(tJR-3 5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) and request for bonus density for development of 40
multiple family residences
II SITE INF'ORMAT'ION
A Site Size Approximately l 82 acres
B Corriprebensive Plan
1 Lanci LTse Plan The Comprehensive Plan category of the subject property is
Urban The Urban (U) category is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of a"city-like" environment which includes vanous land uses,
intensive residential development and public facilities and services The
following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to this proposal
DETAILED DEFIIVITIUjV
Densrty Characterrstlcs
Resrdenhal net densities should have an approxrmate density of 1 unit per acre
to 17 units per acre
Response The proposal has a density of 22 5 uruts per acre which is not
consistent with the suggested density range However the proposed density,
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for 7E-36-96 Page 6
considering the requested bonus density, is within the permitted density range
allowed by the Urban Residnetial-22 (UR-22) zone which is intended to
implement the Urban category
GOAL 1 1
ENCOURAGE A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES AND DENSITIES
OBJECTIVE
lla
Promote fill-m withrn establrshed development areas and exrstrng outlyrng
communities where uttlittes arterials schools and community facilrties have
already been established
DECISION G UIDELINE
111
Urban development will be approved ln areas havrng adeqaiate potiver
supplies water sanitary and storm sewers streets and schools and fire
servrces provided that such development meets the rntent of other Objectives
and Decrsron Gurdelrnes of this sectton
Response The proposal is vrnthin an established development area where
utilities, artenals, schools and community facilrties are established
OBJECTIVES
llb
Hrgher densiry developments such as mulli family and mobile home
(manufactured homes) parks should be located with direct or near drrect access
to the major artertal systems rather than on interior nerghborhood streers
Access to publrc transportatron should also be considered
Response Fourth Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposal, is designated as a
Collector Artenal on the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan Map Evergreen
Road, wluch is designated as a Principal Artenal is located approYimately 300
feet east of the proposal
llc
When multr family dwellrngs are to be located adjacent to single famrly areas
careful consideratron must be given to the densrty artd designs of the multiple
family development so as to ensure protection of the amenities of the single-
family area
Response Buffenng, including landscaping and sight obscunng fencing are
required per Zoning Code regulations Additional buffenng and/or design
alterations may be appropnate, as determined by the Hearmg Examiner
DECISION G UIDELINES
113
A mulhfamrly dwellrng structarre eYCeeding three (3) restdenhal zcnrts or a
development of such structures or manufactured homes (eYCept those on
sTngle family lots) should a) locate adjacent to designated arterrals b)
locate near existmg or planned publcc transit routes c) improve or maintain
consrstency of adjacent single famrly area amenrtres
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 7
+
Response a) and b) The proposal is adjacent to an arterial and is within the
Publlc Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) as designated by the Spokane Transit
Authonty Currently, the nearest bus route is approximately 1/8 of a mile to the
north on Sprague Avenue Response c) The proposal is in the viclnity of a
singie famlly area Design standards for buffering and screening are required to
mitigate impacts to adjacent areas
OBJECTIVE
Ild
Endorse the basrc rrght offree chorce for all people to live where they please
DECISION G UIDELINE
114
A varrety of densitres and resrdential aises should be avarlable to provide a
freedom of choice to live in Urban areas with varyrng densities combination
or mrx of uses (see detailed Urban definitions)
Response The proposal provtdes for greater variety of density in the area and
provides opportunity for individuals to live zn the area who may otherwise be
excluded
Other Comprehensive Plan policies duectly applicable to the proposal include
Section 14, Urban Impact Area (UTA) The UTA establishes a boundary
between areas intended for urban uses and areas intended for rural uses in
utuncorporated Spokane County The proposal is w2thin the UTA boundary in
an area intended for urban uses Specifically Objective 14 1 a relates to the
proposal and is as follows
OBJECTIVE
14 la
Growth development and higher intensrtres of land uses should be encouraged
insrde the Spokane County Urban Impact Area corrsrstent wrth the Future Land
Use Plan
Response The proposal is withln the Urban Impact Area boundaries and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
2 Arterial Road Plan The proposal is located adjacent to Fourth Avenue Fourth
Avenue is designated as a Collector Artenal by the Spokane County Artenal Road
Plan To implement the Artenal Road Plan the County Engineer is requesting that
a stnp of property 12 5 feet in width be set aside as a future acqulsition area The
County Engineer is requesting 2 5 feet of nght-of-way dedication for Fourth
Avenue
3 Parks Plan Terrace View Park is located approxlmately 1 mile south of the
proposal The park is 7 5 acres in size and features picnic tables and a public
swimming pool
C Site Characteristics The site is relatively flat with native grasses and weeds
There are no structures on site
I I-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 8
I) Zoning Analysis Zoning in the area is charactenzed by commercial zoning
north of the abandoned Old Milwaukee Railroad nght-of-way and residential
zorung south of the nght-of-way The residential zoiung is largely Urban
Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) wnth the exception of an Urban Residennal-22 (UR-
22) zone directly east of the proposal The Urban Residentlal-22 (UR-22) (ZE-
88-80C) zone to the east was onginally approved in 1980 under the now expired
Spokane County Zorung Ordinance as a Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) zone
No specific site plan was submitted with the 1980 Zone Reclassification The
Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) zone crossed over to the Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) zone with the adoption of the Spokane County Zoning Code
Proposal Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural (A) in 1941 (ZE-101-41)
North Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural (A) in 1941 (ZE-101-41)
South Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
esiablished as Agricultural (A) in 1944 1941 (ZE-101-41)
East Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) established in 1991, previously
established as Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) (ZE-88-80C)
West Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural (A) in 1941 (ZE-101-41)
E Land Use Analysis Land use within the viciruty of the proposal consists of
predominantly single family residences vvith some vacant land Commercial
development exists along Sprague Avenue to the north of the proposal
Site Vacant
North Vacant
South Single family residences
East Vacant
West Single family residences
F Des,gn
Site Plan
Use 40 multi-family dwellings
Proposed buildings Two multifamily buildings and associated garages
Site Coverage 32 %
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 9
Buildtne Setbacks Proposed ReQuired
Front yard (Fourth Avenue ) 25 feet 25 feet
Side yard 10+ feet 5 feet per story
Parking 82 60 feet
Maximum Structure Height 2 5 stones 50 feet max
Fencing not illustrated 6' sight obscuring
(north and west property boundary)
Landscapina Proposed Required
Adjacent to Fourth Avenue 20 ft Type III 20 feet of Type III
Adjacent to north & west 5 ft Type III 5 ft Type III
property line
The site plan generally complies with the development standards of the Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone Buffering of the adjacent single family residential
properties is required by the Zoning Code including construction of a 6 foot
sight obscunng fence and 5 feet of Type III landscaping
Other Site Plan Considerations The site plan submitted for review by the
Hearing Examiner is general in nature Detailed review to determine
compliance with all Code regulations and conditions of approval is
recommended to be administrative and to occur pnor to issuance of building
permrts
G Circulatioa The property will be accessed from Fourth Avenue Internal
circulation will be provided by pnvate dnveways
H Drainage A drainage plan will be required pnor to the issuance of any
building pennits This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County
Division of Engineenng pnor to building permrts being issued
I Power 'I'ransmission Lines/Other Known Easements None known
J Water Supply The proposal is witlun the Vera Water & Power Water Distnct
K Sewage Disposal A public sewer system is available to the site Plans and
specifications for connection to the sewer wnll be reviewed and approved prior
to the issuance of any building pernuts
L School The proposal is in the Central Valley School Distnct No 356 The
Central Valley School Distnct has submitted a letter indicating that schools are
currently over-crowded The Distnct suggests that the proposal should be
denied unless approved with a condition that the developer and the Distnct
agree to voluntary fees The Division of Building and Planning has included a
condition of approval requu-mg the project sponsor to negotiate a voluntary
agreement with the School District to mitigate impacts of the development on
schools
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 10
M Fire Protection The proposal is within Fire District No 1 The Fire District
and the Division of Building and Planning are required to approve fire
protection provisions prior to issuance of building permits
N Cultural Resources/Critical Areas None have been identified
O Parks and Recreation No comments have been received
P Wetlands No wetlands are shown on the Spokane County Wetlands Inventory
Maps
Q Density The applicant is requesting one unit of bonus density per the
provisions of Chapter 14 820 of the Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter
14 820 allows bonus density in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone of up to
3 5 additional units per acre for direct sanitary sewer hookup Bonus density is
at the discretion of the Hearing Body
III ENVIRONlYIENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
Division of Bwlding and Planning The review considered the specifics of the
proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws,
possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and
other County policies and gwdelines The Division of Bwlding and Planning has
deternuned that "No probable sigruficant adverse impacts" would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsigruficance
("DNS")
The "DNS" was circulated to 14 other agencies ofjunsdiction and other agencies/
departments affected by the future development for review and comment The
"DNS" comment penod ends November 11, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site The
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the
public hearing
IV DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNIiNG RECOlVI1VIENDATION
The proposal is generally consistent with the Goals Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan and generally complies with the development
standards of the Urban Residential-22 (UR 22) Landscaping and fencing
requirements will provide a buffer to the nearby residential uses The Division of
Building and Planning recommends approval, as conditioned
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 11
V CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i All conditions gmposed by tbe Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the
"Applicant", which terms shall mclude the owner or owners of the
property, heirs, assigns and successors
ii The zone reclassification applies to the following r-eal pe-operty
N 290 68 ft of W 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE %4 of NE '/4 S of CM ST R& P
RR R/W Except N 105 ft
TOGETHER WITH
W 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE ~/4 of NE '/4 of S of CM ST P&P R.R R/W exc S
20 ft and exc N 290 68 ft MOL
SPOKANE I)IVISION OF BUILI)ING AND PLANNI1VG
1 The proposal shall comply unth the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, as
amended
2 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a
vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action
This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval
affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded witlun the
same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in
part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows
The parcel of property Degally described as [ ] is tbe subject of a
land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Admingstrahve
Official on [ imposing a varaety of special developmeot condihons
File lvo [ J is available for inspection and copying in tbe Spokane
I)ivesaon of Building and Planning
3 The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
authonzed by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include
Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrantJflow, approved water systems,
building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exrting, extenor
wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Building and
Planning reserves the nght to confirm the actual address at the time of building
permit )
4 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body Vanations, when approved by the
Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All
variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintained
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 12
5 Approval is required by the Director/designee of a specific lighting and sxgning
plan for the described property prior to the release of any build2ng permits
6 A specif c landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
aeceptable to the Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance band or
other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of building permlts
Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access
points is not obscured or impaired
7 Direct light from any extenor area ltghting fixture shall nvt extend over the
property boundary
8 The Spokane County Division of Building and Planrung shall prepare and record
with the County Auditor a Trtle Nottce specifying a future land acquisition area
for road nght-of-way and utilrtxes The reserved future acquisttion area Title
Notice shall be released 1n full or in part, by the Division The notice should be
recorded wrthin the same time frame as an appeal and shall provlde the following
a At least 12 5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilrties along Fourth Avenue
b Future building and a#her setbacks requued by the Spokane County Zoning
Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisrtion area
c No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas drainfield or allowed signs
should be Iocated wrthin the future acqu.isrtion area for road right-of-way
and util2ties If any of the above improvements are made witlun this area,
they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway
improvements are made
d The future acquisitxon area until aequrred, shall be pnvate property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parkuig, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered intenm uses
e The property owner shail be responsible for relocating such "interlm"
unprovements at the time Spokane County makes roadway tmprovements
after acquinng said future acquisitian area
9 Buildtng height shall be limited to 35 feet
10 The owner shall negotiate with Central Valley Schooi Distnct and submrt a
recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools
pnor to issuance vf building pernuts The agreement shall provide a wntten
descnption of the subject property to which the agreement applies and alsv state
the doilar amount and any other agreed to mitigatang measures
Voluntary agreements between the owner and schoal distnct shall conform to the
requirements of RC W Chapter 82 02
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 13
Attached are conditions/comments submltted to the file from the following agencies
Spokane County Division of Engineenng, dated November 5, 1996
Spokane County Division of Utilities, dated Oetober 31, 1996
Spokane County Health Distrrct, dated October 21 1996
Central Valley School District No 356, dated October 21, 1996
11 -13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 14
~
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3640 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER`S CONDITIONS 4F APPROVAL" ZONES
TO Spokane County Planning Department
~~~i~r~
F'ROM Division of Engineering & Roads P
DATE 11/05/96 SPOKANE GQUIV
TY
PR4JECT UR-3 5 T4 UR-22 aPT 46 UNITS NO'J O}
FILE # ZE-036-96 / (DRZE-180-96)
Hearing/Review Date 11/13/1996 D1VrSrCf,1 OFSUILpI~aG ANp pLiNjyING
Sponsor/Applicant GREG ARGER aY
Section Township Range 22-25-44
Planner STEVE DAVENPORT"
Design/Review aate (03/27/I996 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the zbove refereneed
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Eact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
Prior to issuance vf a building permit or at the rectuest of the County
Engineer in con3unction wlth a County Road Pro3ectfRoad Impravement
District, whichever comes first
1 Applicant shall dedicate 2 5 feet on Fourth Avenue for right of w«y
2 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Caunty Engineer
3 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engirieer
road, drainage and access plans
a A parking plan and traffic circulatlon plan shall be submitted and
appraved by the Spokane County Engineer The deslgn, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required far any portion of the pro3ect wnlch is to
be oceupied or traveled by vehicles
5 The construction of the roGdway lmprovements stated herein sha11 be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
6 The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway
Section for the improvement of Fourth Avenue whlch is ad3acent to the
proposed development This wi11 require the addition of approximately
8-10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbinc
and sidewalk must also be constructed
CC Araolicant GREG AFGER
EnqineerlSurveyor CHPPLES E SIMP5W
11-13-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-36-96 Page 15
Paqe 2 ,
11/13I1996 03/27/1996
ZE-036-96 DRZE-160-96
7 All required improvements shall canform to the current State of
Washington Standard Sgeciflcations for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
8 Access to the South Valley Arterial shall be prohibited until such
time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requlrements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
10 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of way is subaect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 All required construction wlthin the existing or proposea public rlght
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
12 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Faurth Avenue as a 70 foot
Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 20 feet from
centerline is not consistent with that specified in The Plan In
order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
addition to the required right of way dedlcation, a strip of property
12 5 in width along the Fourth Avenue frantage be set aside in
reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Arterial Improvements are made to Fourth Avenue
13 The applicant should be advised that there may exlst utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
Caunty will assume no financial obligation for adDustments or
relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
" - - - - - - _ _ - - .r w r
To STEVE DAVENPORT, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning Hearing Examiner
From Spokane County Utilities
Date 10/31/96
Subject Conditions of Approval
Planning Action Number ZE 0036-96 Type of Action ZR Arger Capital Corp
Applicant ARGER CAPITAL CORPORATION Legal Owner ARGER CAPITAL CORPORATION
300 N MULLAN RD STE 204 300 N MULLAN RD STE 204
SPOKANE WA 99206 SPOKANE WA 99206
Sewer Service
SS09 A wet (Iive) sewer connection to the area wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer
connection permit is required
SS12 Appiicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department under separate cover oniy
those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for (1)Public Sewer Connections and
Facilities (2)Doubie Plumbing (3) Private Sewer System Design and Connections (4)Dry Sewer
Connections for review and approval pnor to the finalization of the project and or the issuance of permit
to connect
(1)
SS13 Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of (1)Public Sewer
Connectrons and Facilities (2)Double Plumbing (3)Private Sewer System Design and Connections
(4)Dry Sewer Connections pnor to the finalization of the project and or the issuance of the permit to
connect to the Pubiic Sewer System
(1)
SS15 Arrangements for payments of appficable sewer charges must be made for prror to issuance of sewer
connection permit
Water Service VERA WATER AND POWER
WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County as amended
1 1_1 'Z_QG LTZ' CF- .,FG D,...,.,,.} F,.,,. 7L'_Za_Qa p~na 1 7
~ )KANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRI%,
n
ENVIRONNIENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
ccl- , i-r
Inter office Communication
r ) ,n r' r
I....~
~ DATE October 21 1996
~
TO Steve Davenport AICP Planner II Spokane Countv Buildina and Planning Division
~
,
FROM Donald T Lynch EHS 11 EHD SCHD L-
~
SUBJECT Proposed Zone Change ZE-36-96 (ArQer)
1 References
a) Vtap of subjec.t scale 1= 20 bv Roy LWyatt dated Au`ust 14 1996 received bv this office
October 17 1996
b) Reconnaissance GeoloQic Mao of the West Half of the Spokane Quadranele Washintzton and Idaho
Allan B Gri~gs 1966
c) Soil Survev Sookane Countv WashinQton Soil Conservation Service, U S D A March 1968
d) Saokane Countv WashinQton EnaineennLir Intemretations Soil Conservation Ser-vice U S D A
Auaust 1974
e) Sookane Countv Rtiles and ReQulations tor SewaQe Dtsposal Svstems Januarv 19 1995
t) Logs of water wells in Ranve 44E Township 2DN Sections 15 21 22 23 and 27
Map Greenacres Quadranale U S G S 1973 and Spokane N E U S G S 1973
? Findinc.,rs
a) This project lies over the Spokane Rathdrum Aquifer
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Ser-vice Area n3 and wlthin the service area of Vera Water
& Power Water supply will be a public svstem
c) The project is inside the Spokane Countv Comprehensive Wastewater Nlanagement Area inside the
General Sewer Service Area and inside the PrtoritV Sewer Service Area recommended in the 201
Study The method of sewaqe disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities Count'v
pursuant to Countv Resolution 80 0418 adopted March 24 1980 The topography and soil~, in the area
are generally suitable for use ot individual on-5ite sewage disposal systems The lot is not of the
proper dimensions to permit the use ot both an individual well and sewaae svstem
d) The project lies in a relativelv flat lrea ~,ke5t ut EverUreen Road and north ot 4"' avenuz Local
draina~~e~va~s are inst~nific.ant
11-13-96 HE StafF Reoort for ZE-36-96 Page 18
Proposed Zone Change ZE-36-96 (Ac` )
Paee 2
e) Surface soils are classed by the U S Soil Conservation Service as Garrison Gravellv Loam with 0% to
5% slopes Thev have a septic tank filter fie(d limitation ot sliQht (There is also possible
contaminatton of croundwater ) This soil would be classified as a Tvpe IV
~ Geologically the soils are Glacicofulvial deposits These geological structures generally yteld
moderate to very large amounts of water Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows
they are from 99' to 250 deep and have static water levels varying from 77 to 172 below the surface
The Vera Water & Power has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon
completion of aareements with the proponent
3 Required (mandatorv) Conditions If Approved
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities Spol.ane Countv
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities Spokane Countv
c) Water service shall be by an eYisting public water supplv ~vhen approved bv the ReQional Enaineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health
d) A public sewer system will be made available fur the project and individual ser-vice will be provided
Use of individual on-site sewaae disposal svstems shall not be authorized
4 Recommended Condition5 of Approval
a) Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
c Director of Utilities Spokane Countv
c Sponsor Arger Capital Corporation
300 N Mullan Road n204
Spokane, WA 99206
landuae ItrZE 6 06 Arter
11-13-96 HE Staff Report foL ZE-36-96 Page 19
~
~ 0~ CeYdti alVa~~~y
IL School Usu-ia 356
An Equal
a~
Opp )r(unitv Employer
51v~, Gr -ulL::t\C,1i 1- Easc 19307 Cataldu
October 21 1996 , c« natres w~ 99016
~ (SQ9) 9 6 W
Spokane County Planning Department
1026 West Broadway
Spokane WA 99260
RE
Dear N1r
This is in response to your request for comments regarding ZE-36-96 The development will
be located in the Spokane Valley and will produce forty (40) new apartment units
The Board of Directors of Central Valley School Distnct has adopted a resolution whuch directs
the administration to take necessary action to mitigate impacts upon the School Distnct created
by housing developments The authonty for this action is SEPA, RCW 82 02 020 and RCW
58 17 110 Under these statutes, the County, pnor to approvuig a subdivision, must determine
whether adequate provisions exist for public school service
The Central Valley School Distnct has determined that added dwellings envisioned by this
proposal will adversely impact the Distnct's ablhty to provide adequate student housing We
ask that Spokane County not approve ZE-36-96 unless the developer and Central Valley School
Distnct agree to voluntary means of mitigating its adverse impact on the Central Valley School
Distnct The School Distnct seeks a fee or other measure which would riutigate the impact by
partially funding cost of space to adequately house students residing in the proposed new
housing Tlus determinauon is based on the following
1 The Distnct's elementary schools are overcrowded We are currently using portable
faclhtles We have need for additional classroom space
2 Enrollment projections indicate that the capacity of our schoois to house students will
continue to be exceeded Enrollment projections are based on a cohort survival model
which predicts future enrollment based on the past three years' enrollment growth by
grade level
3 A number of housing developments have been submitted for preliminary plat approval
within the Central Valley School Distnct Many of these approved developments have
not been completed Students from these developments will contnbute to the
overcrowding of our schools
1 1_1 -4_Qr% 14P Ct!nfF Z?o.nt Fnr 77_`Ir,_QA PaoP 7n
ZE-36-96
Page -2-
In summary, Central Valley School Distnct asks that Spokane County either deny the presently
proposed ZE-36-96 or approve it wnth the condihon that the developer and Central Valley School
Distnct agree to voluntary fees or other means of mitigation It should be noted, however, that
said fees provide insufficient funding to support school construcaon needs
Thank you for requesting our comments We trust you will find these comments useful in
assessing the impact of this proposal
Sincerel,~,
Dave Jackman
Director
Auxlhary Sernces
ZE3696 cty
1-13-96 HE Staff ReDort for ZE-36-96 Page 21
mw J.R. BONNETTENGiNEERiNG
CIM & S772L C?zlRiL EN6.tA'F-ERLVG1CONSVL71NG
9306 N-vOY?OhT HIGXri 4)
SPUJIANE Ii.t 092I8
(509) 468 '626
August 6 1996
A Sc
Pat Harper ~O f wASti
Spokanc County Engineers
W 1026 Broadway ~
Spokane Wa 99260 ,a
2 ti Q
/S7ER~
Re 4th and Evergreen ktezone Traffic Dutnbution ss~~UAL Eta
Dear Pat ~ EXPIRES 9~f1 /q7 ~
I have been contacted by Jay Bonnett of J R Engineering a representatsve for Arger Capital
Corporation to perform a brief ttip olscribution analysis for a proposed project near the
intersection of 4th Avenue and Evergreen Road in the Spokane Valley The proposed project
ls located on vacant land in the norihwest quadrant of the intersectiun one parcei west of
Evergreen
The proposed use for this site is a 40 unit apartment complex conslsting of 2 and 2 1/2 story
buildings Trip generation charaetzristics tor the aparcmeilt complex as detaiied in the 7'np
Generatton ManuQl Sth Editron published by the Insttcute of TransportatTOn Engineers were
used tor this analysis Addittonal trips due to the proposed develupment were calculated for
AM and PM peak hour crattic and for the averagegnumber of daily trips generated on a
weekday Saturday and on a Sunday 'I'he fo-ilowjng table summarizes the trip generation
information ~j
Trjp Ceneratiorl
Time Pettod Additional Trias In Out
AM Peak Hr 18 4 14
PM Feak Hr 20 13 7
Wzekday Trips 251 125 125
Saturday Trips 217 108 108
Sunday Trips 174 $7 87
See the atrachments for details on calculating trip gelleration
~
~ 7'he trip distrsbution for these additional trips is based tipon the following assumpttons
1) Only a small portion of tripc exiting or entering rhe proposed slte will be going to
or comtng from areas south of the project There are some schools located souch of the
site and those desiring to head south on SR 27 will use Evergreen Road However
there are no major cznters ot employment or business in thts direction therefore I
assumed only 5% will head south on Evergreen R.oad
2) Sprague Avenue in chis area is a major center for many different kinds of shopping
There are 5 6 grucery stores 4 major recail scores an office supply store home
improvement stores and many other smaller stores and businesses between Pynes Road
and Sullivan Road un Sprague Avenue Also Safeco Insurance has a building on
Sprague Avenue in this same area These stores and businesses on Sprague Avenue
will attract many of the trips generated by this project I assumed 30 % of the
additional trips generated by this project will go to or come from Sprague Avenue
This percentage is increased on the weekends to 45 % due to pe.ople generally not
working on the weekends and available to do shopping
3) Ano[her primary desttnauon of trips generated by this pro1ect will travel narth of I-
40 on Sullivan Road This is a highly indusveyalized area with several large companies
employing many people Among them are several companies leasing space at the
Spokane Industrial Park, Johnson Matthey, Inland Asphalt and Kalser Aluminum
(Trentwood) The rouce that will be used to get to this area will be to Sullivan Road
and then over 190 I assumed that 25 % of the addttional trips generated by this project
wil I use Sullivan Road tolfrom work Another S% will use Pines Rc►ad to travel to
destinations north of 1-90
4) Since the proposed project site ts located almosc equidistant rrom elther Pines Road
or Suilivan Road 1 assumed that those wishing to go west on 190 will use Pines
Road/1-90 Ynterchange and those wishing co go east on 190 will use Su11 ivan Road/I 90
interchange Usz of a different interchange to access 190 will invotve at teast 2 miles
of back trackrng or increased tlme on County arterials Since this site is located almost
halfway between the downtown area of Spokane and Post Falls I assumed as many
people will wock tn Spokane as in the Post FaIIs/Caeur d Alene area Both Westbound
190 and Eastbound 190 each are assumed to receive 15 % of the additional trips
generated by this project
S) Most of those traveling to Sullivan and north to I 90 will use Sprague Road to a%,old
having to ma.ke a left turn onto Sulltv-tn Road at 4th Avenue However there will be
some that will use 4th Avenue and turn lett onto Sullivan Road Also some will use
4th Avenue co go to Central Valley High Schuol iocated south on Sullivan Road I
assumed 15 % wil l travel east on 4th Avenue to Sull i. an with 5% turning nghc (south)
nnd 10% turning left (north)
2
6) The trips to and from each destination will have the same percentagzs for each
direction with the following excep[ion Trips returning to the site from north of I-90
on Sullivan Road witl be spilt differently at the Sprague Avenue intersectlon I
escimaced half of those trips will go stcaight through the incerseccion turning right at
4th Avenue and back to the site avoiding lights on Sprague Avenue The other half
will turn right at Sprague Avenue to use the arterial turn left onto Evergreen Road
and thzn to the site They may du shopping banking ect on the way home from work
or may want to use the safer more developed roadway without potential interference
trom pedestrians or vehicles entering or exiting from drsveways
See the actachments for sketches showing trip dtstribution percentages exiting and entering the
site and for the distribution of additional trips for AM peak hour PM peak hour average
weekday Saturday and Sunday
A future 190 interchange at Evergreen Road will lessen the impacts due to this proposed
development on both the Pines Roa.d/I-90 interchange and the Sullivan Road/I-90 interchange
Traftic wtll predominantly use Evergreen Road to access I 90 for both westbound and
eas tbou nd travel
Trip generation amoun[s were also calculated for a second proposed use 40 units of elderly
housing Peak hour flow9 for these units are very low There are only 2 additional AM peak
trips and 3 addttional PM pealc hour trips generated for this proposed use See thc attachmen[s
tor these trip generatlon calculattons
As shown in this report the proposed apartmeilt pruject will add only 2 vehtcles per peak hout
co westhound I 90 traftic and only 2 vc.hicles per peak hour to eastbound I-90 traffic Traffic
impacts on Pines Road v%ill be very minimal and will not adversely attect existing tratftc
Also additional peak haur trtps added to the existing traffic in this area are a very small
percentage af the existjtig trafric and wJll have no signifccant impact on exzsting trdftic flows
or levels of service
Thank you for your time and considerarion on this matcer If you need additional information
on this issue please let me know
Slncerely
d.,-d4e6
'T'imothy A Schwab P E
1 AS/cas
cc Prokey Arger
lay Bonnett
3
r
~
Oh-Y
~
,
A f-►! r'7;xf t NTS - t ~ 1`~ 7 3 I
i 1
7 G (/Pq g L t~~T~, ~
I _
A ve, -r-
I
c,w rr ~
76 14
~ PM ~o ~ rwt z,,; q ~ G P.~n (1 > z L I -rt ,
~
J~v t iZA fL ~ D'4 q'ric-~ cs l ctv T +
r
~ Q ~4o re_)
( 7
A✓ 4 Us '?ra a P ENVS 4N ~ Gt1Et 4 vA Y C~9 s zo 11T-)
I~~b t'~4-r& 'I- Gz8 TF r~~vN~T
,
(a Zv5 7-t~/ C 1}v c%• r►.~ = Z'S 1~~s 50 l~R av 12S
r va r r ~
E
i Q V4 vE,a -rrzir- F..jpsOv Q SArv,ei*y ~P 375
r43 l~ rslc~ rr
~
~
f s ~1 3 '~~t rs l ~ o (.Afr ~s. 4 ~.1 _ ~R Ps ~ ~ '►y~/' ..ic - 10 $
So / Fx r~t•~• ' f~`~
1+ J4 U~ ~I Tr,+ r Cr/a c Da/ ACpt 3z 7
A ~,'pTt . Q 36
~ '4 56 T~ tr.~ (-q o 4' J:4>~za~ - 87
i {
~ i
~
i
f
1 ~
i
l N~~'.~~✓ r 7ff fLc f7vrY
{
7 10N
~
(
El.MZC;lr 11'?W51.t16 rt,(CN&U
,
t 4A1 Pt j K- Ae 7 ~ qA,~.t C P 4 7
~
~
~VG. FAT-Jlr~ 005 Tj-~Ts
I
~ a 'Tr v U•~ *s~ ~s 5or ~rr.~c~va - I
I ''o r
i ~
v7E~ ~
I A-va
f
i o 0 8 1
s e Y ~ - r
~
~
~
; I I
,
1
I
1
~
S
I
I
I
~
i ~
~
~
s
1
I
I
~
1
t
,
r ~
1
~
1
l
ti
~
~
a
'
• ~,1 ~ SS ~ d t _ ~ ,
~f
►
r-
~
~
1
~ ~,a,, ~v~ ~ • ,
~
- ~ r11
°Z
:~1 ~ ,Q~ •
_ ~j
TA 1 j}~
. „?¢►G ` 5~
~ _ -
f °
I RL - . .
~
30
J l~
1
~ ~of ~,~ts
tA *k 410
, 30 /
! m' j I1 1
~ ~~~►u~ ~ ~ t►r !
iwa io
~1
\
1
i
1 ~
i
r
~
~
1
~
►5~ 1
~vt t S~ o I✓ ~ , t
Zk
w
AvE . Ao
~
~
~
a ~
7oI~ 5/ 311, I 201~
16
{
S~
34~ 4* c ~ c z°v
> Els~
3oI
~
~c/ WZ A. F"r - (r I✓ OF PS ✓t et 4~5
D~iT/I~Ay~G1►~ ~r 11Ctr5
, Rov-r~s Sa~t Qs &CVrI,6)4T'tLtP5
dIP- 5y, -fyzlps 4N
US E'QyOA Vc- CeYEwrvC, SrfE
'r1~~►~ fu,i vNuc s Te-
~
~
r
r
s
~
~
t
~
4
1
90
~
~ \
~
W
~ 1 .
~
` ~aP`~w►-~-~~1~~ ~
i
~
~
!
'lt.q ' ~~~~VL
~ ~ ~C' ~ ~ 5 1~ ~F1L
.A ,n
iG t~ao`
~ ` p> Tv
~ t7 ~,-(t G~ ~Q it J 1~G`f ~ o r
~
~tL , • ~
A w~
-
~
,i
S
I
1 -
{ +
t
~
Z ~
~
w
W
~
aC `
~
!
S ~
I
~ ~ 4T-~~~ - 4r" -
- ~ ►
Svv,ct~ ~ - .4 ~Trt ► p, rKfl.- SPR AGv E
~Dpr~lo~Q~ ~Fz1P5
Dv~ o - ~ '~P~Q, YR~-
~Kv PbcF a Pea~~~-r
Z 'TC: F-., rca,, Spv K,MJE (Wf A
!
FM rTAY- 'Fr--o►., Pv .f1 ~i( ce.s C~A~ 7~
L ~K'~p~ ~[o►v~ ~~•-co~s ~ D~~tc
I 'S `r.~TA ~
t
~
~
i ~
~
i; 3f~ '~31
►
2o'~,~~
~
~ se `C C° . .
a,
t 4 ~ ~
~
~
~
~
r 1 Z.ti
t ~
! 2~
1 . ~
~ A4 - 3, fir3
~ ~df.
240 3i~:7-5-
4
r ,
~
~
AV~,-t o~.~ ~
~tL
U=AY
. ~
~
I
I
~
►
t
6.L1 T(a
- M - - ~
Z S
< SS 7~✓ r1 ~ ~
u ~
.r ~
~ i ~ ?Z-
L. ~
28 ~ ~ T28 ~
I~
~
~
wf ~
,
3 6 4- ~
4t7~
s~► ~ ~ !o~ ~ ~ I
Ilo ~ ~ ~l !
~g
46 l0 39
S
~ 3R r41
-38 4 14
pvr 4~----_
3- ~ s
i
1 A~~~ioNl~t,...
To PPoFvC~C t> FraJtcT
~
rA'f vtr vd r_ ie ►ps ~
I
W~Lr- CNt~ S -Fpt PS .SFtiKik Nt L'ti vY7 ^ Ctv,)[+D -T-t
r e C'c f pC I I PS n W1; 1 ' q
10 10 ~Y Cj / ~~✓Ctl//1it
V T
r
-rr-If S're. ST'r ,4c, v f. AV c- QY IO
~
~
1
~
1
►
~ TA
~
2Z ~'Z1 r -
Y
Y {
~~4 A
~
:7 r 19
8~' g 30 zZ`~' ' 3~ _ ~ 5
r ~fqA O.
a 3a t ~J 30 5 1
,
i
ti
I ~
i '
lvrjA L- '
A~
~ ~i „~•o poycv ~ +
~ J A y Skc vg cfiY
t~' P ~t ~G`~ ~c~ •
USL SAK~
~
e
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER' S CONDITIOYJS OF APPROVAL" ZONES
TO Spokane County Planning Department
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE 11/05/96
PROJECT UR-3 5 TO UR-22 aPT 46 UNYTS
F'%LE # ZE-036-96 / (DRZE-180-96)
Hearing/Review Date 11/13/1996
Sponsor/Applicant GREG ARGER
Section Township Range 22-25-44
Planner STEVE DAVENPORT
Design/Review Date (03/27/1996 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prios to selease of a buildmng permit or use of property as proposed
Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County
Engineer in con3unction with a County Road Pro3ect/Road Improvement
District, whichever comes first
1 Applicant shall dedicate 2 5 feet on Fourth Avenue for right of way
2 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
3 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans
4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
5 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
6 The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway
Section for the improvement of Fourth Avenue which is ad3acent to the
proposed development This will require the addition of approximately
8-10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing
and sidewalk must also be constructed
CC Applicant GREG ARGER
Engineer/Surveyor CHARLES E SIMPSON
" f
Page 2
11/13/1996 03/27/1996
ZE-036-96 DRZE-180-96
7 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
8 Access to the South Valley Arterial shall be prohibited until such
time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
10 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of way is sub]ect to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
12 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Fourth Avenue as a 70 foot
Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 20 feet from
centerline is not consistent with that specified in The Plan In
order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in
addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property
12 5 in width along the Fourth Avenue frontage be set aside in
reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time
when Arterial Improvements are made to Fourth Avenue
13 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for ad3ustments or
relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for ad3ustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
EngeBhard, Scoff _
From Hemmings Bill
Sent Wednesday October 23 1996 9 03 AM
To Harper Pat
Cc Engelhard Scott Franz Dean
Sula)ect ZE 36 96 Greg Arger
I have visited the site for this rezone and have no problem letting it go forward to hearing as it lies in an area of
Garnson Gravel soils that are preapproved for the drywelUswale concept I will hand deliver a copy of this to John
Peterson
Page 1
r ~
Washpngton S$ate Eastern Region
~f Tran5~ortM8on 2714 N Mayfair Streei
Spokane WA 99207 2090
Sid N4orrison
SecreLary of Transportaiion (509) 324 6000
March 27, 1996
Ms Lorne Lakshas
Spokane County Pianning Department
1026 West Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260
Re Greg Arger Zone Reclassification
Request
Dear Mr Lakshas
After reviewing the information that was provided to us, along with the design review noticc,
the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the foliowing comment"
on this development proposal
m Due to the tnp generation potential of these proposed 46 multi family uruts and the
operational problems currently being expenenced at the Pines/I-90 Interchange Area and
Pines and 1VLssion intersection, we would request that the applicant provide a trip
distnbution analysis for this project to determine if these above areas will be impacted by
this proposed development This tnp distnbution analysis needs to be provided prior to an
environmental determination being reached on this project
If you should have any questions on this matter please feel free to contact myself or Greg Figb
in our planrung department at 324-6199
Sincerely,
.L.eG~~ IOQ
LEONARD C CASH PE
Regional Planning Engtneer
LCC/gf
cc Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
Applicant
-3 ~bl
' /yo /'A .6 LCxc , r A/ ei
.
.
t
il
T~
; r
S P O K A N E N T Y )7--
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DNISION OF THE PUBllC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilides Deparanent
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Valley School District
Vera Water District
Fire District No. 1
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner ~
DATE: March 18, 1996
RE: Zone Reclassification froni tTrhn.n
Residential-?? (UR_22)
APPLICATlON ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN RF.VIEW MEETIN(,
MARCH 27. 1996 AT 1:15
COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND I'LOOR
Please review the above application and use the a<<ached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your Commenis. The Division of Building and
Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have
been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comrlients on
the attached form to Lorne Lakshas for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting arld
included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the
meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application ,
please contact Lorne Lakshas of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205.
c: Greg Arber, Nortl13UU Mullail, Suite 204, Spokane, WA 99206
AttaChments: ApPlication Accep[ance and Design Review Form, Projcct Design, Site Plail
102() %\1'-,1Lil~i):~i?'~':~'~" Bu1LDI1vG PxotvE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243
TDD: (509) 324-3166
~
~
i ~ F F F -r ~ d E r : i.:, U N ..r y r4 i p- c
~::f f~ 0 k:: r,i r_:: o t.~ ~i -r, r p ~J r'~ F-i :L I'.i t::, _i.
~
c::,
(C ~ ~
i_~ .rc_i i t f=' 1a n n ca
Administrator)
Fr-c-lmc Spokane G-Dunty Enqineer's Department
.
S!►.h.ject: C;r-)nditi~.-ins ._-f Approval Zone Change No:DRZE_180_96
t3pp1 i cants hlame Arger
E-iecticln a`'2, T-:Iwn,hip Np Ranae 44 I:-:WM
r:~:.~:_Zoniny
T'he fo11owinq "Cc-nditions -::,f Appr-oval" fc-r the above refer-ericed ~----nP
chanqe are submitted to the Spok:ane Gounty Planninq Department f--:,r-
. .
.a..n -Fhp Pt~~.. -a ~r,irr r:. r- = ' t F°.
t .-3.~ ri_ ' ._r~
_ . L
_
. . .
t t t~~ . . _ . . . . .
~.J 1`~ :~a. . - I C? Fc~ ~ I..1'~ ~ ~ : ~ I~ . ~1 E:i
!-i 1- i' 1 Y 1_ •s, ~_l ; I ~l 4~-:' ~ ~ c-+. ~.J 1 J. ~ ~ J.. I. F::.;
'f I'11 1 ,
-
County Enqineer iri con.junction with a Coi_tnty FRc-ad
T in ID r r-l v ? i Tl t- I'l s i; w I"i.7.. i: f i(:~ v i:? 'r a r.7_ fl F I.-Ii tl O~:
. ' . . . . .1.. _ r:' . ' .I.. I.. .C - .1..
^ ' .
t:_ ~::~E:7 f•`ir )f ~ .i.. :,a ~ r. ~ I %:l
_ .
r, • . - . .
. . . l 1. 1 t.. _ ~ s
f.. f~~_~ p~ c:l ' 1 I.' I~I~_j I 1.-:`
prcopc:ssed : ^
E40 Ac ce5s per-mits for approaches to the County Road SystPm shal 1 be
i-ihtained fr,-,m thn Cc-unty EnqinePr.
A p p l:i c a r-r t ~ t~i a 1 1 ►..t l) rri it -f r a E:; p r -rI v LA 1 ir, -y t I-1 e' p~:~~ e-t Fi E-.` C:, C") 1_k nt y
EriQineer rc-ad, drain-aqQ and access plans.
Tr~e applic~.a A <aha11 s~_~bmi~t f- r pp~--~v~.a1 by tF~ ' S ~~~E::ane ~_t ty
. neer an ie Spok:ane C~ ~ nty ealtt-~ Distr ' ct a det led
t:.cemt~i -sit sewaqe sy tem pl n and s+_ir ace w ter disp~~sal
~~lan fie enti pri~~.je t~~r p~~~r ~T~n tfi re~~~f if I-
cIevP1cIpme ~ is phase .
F_~45' A park:ing plan and traffic circi_ilata.on p1an shall be si_tbmitted
and appriDved by t!-ie Spok:ane COLinty Enqineer. ThP desiqn,
location and arranqement cif park:inq stall.s sha11 be in
~ accordanr_e with standard engineerinq practices. I'avinq or
i..( r f - ~ 1. . • r h y . • t; I--, i_ - 11 n . . i . _ t} t r- e i_ .
~~:x c ~ • ~ ~ ~a r- v , .1 r'~:- , ~~i F r~ n r? ~ t~ W:i 1~:~ R a. -r- e c
j } <_A i_:, j
~I` ( I r` ~~~i 1' 1 ~ f I I ~ I k: ' ~.J 1' L•.? W h1 c1 i`:a tc. , f.) f::' C l_ ~_l .L ~r
-1, V.1 E~~ d b 'y' Ve h 1. C I e 5
~ - - .
I hE? c"_'natr'1_(ctic~n c-if the r~~~~adWay irripr*j*,,vefyier-i-G<> s..a.te.. i_.,trein srEca11
be ~.~cc-Dmplished as appr-Dved by the SpoE-:ane C-Dunty EnqincPr.
E'T'f-iz D.-Junty Enqinec-_,r has clesignatecJ a Arter-ial standarrJ
for the improvement of F~~~~~trth_Avenue whi ch is~ad.jacent~to the
proposed development. This~wil lrreqi_iire tfie addition of
aF►proximately 8-1C) fit. ---)f asphalt a1onq the frontaqe of the
cI ev e:1 t~ipm P nt. C+. .,.r h i. nq ~Rn d mi_i. r t a1 Scl h F~ cc.-nr:. tY u.-. tPc-1 0
P'5J:1. A11 reqUired impr -z-vements sha11 conform to the current State -z-f
Washinqton Standard Specifications f-Dr Road and Bridqe
constrLtttion and other applicable cOLtnty standards andlor
adopted resol iAtions pertaininq pertaining to Road Standards and
Stcirmwater Manaqement in effect at the date of ccinstruction,
+ . ti .
C_? - h r ;._i- I~~.
:
- T ~ . I k= ~ ~-i .l. 1
•...1 ` A r c_ f= .,1 I-( `l: ~ ! L i__ t•_' lJ ~..4 ~ 1
sLtc h t i m e as~ 5 pec if.i. ca]. y ;a 1..i t h.-Jr.i. zed h y -1_ I~~ S p~_iE:: i~ C~_~ i_1n~1 y
:i rice r ~
- . . ~ _ . ~ ..l. _ c:l ~ ,
c.l l~ Wc.+.. ~ t•.. ~ ~W,fl.~ 1' i C.~ Jr~~.t n acaE p cl rl
1...! I r'--'clf:~W c~ =i~f,~:~ ricia r~ c:J_~, ~
r-equirements ~.~re foj_tnd in Spok:ane Board of C~Dunty Commissic-ner-__%
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this
p r ~ ~,posa 1 .
E ,.-i f-_i Nc-l cIfl St1'' uCt1c-II-1 Wc.lr k i s k7 e pE' Y` fc-Y' Il1 ed w ith:i. ~~~i the x1 c..:~-' "f'.1 fl g i i r
pr-Dposed right c-f way Ltntil a permit has been iSsIAed by the
C'ounty Enqineer. A11 work: witttiin the public r-Dad right of way is
si_th.ject t._. inspert.ic-n -nc.i appr----va1 hy the C~~-untu Engi.neer.
.
F5':-) All reqLtired construction within tfie existinq or priDposed publ.ic
right uf way is to be complPted prior to the release of a
blAildinq permit or a bond in an amc-i_tnt estimated by the C-DLtnty
EnqineQ~ to CoVt?Y tfiE Co5t of CoC15tY'i.ACt].oi-I or improvements Shal l
F... nqi. n eer„
j. Y he Ci_--i t_1. I'l 'E_ -j` p1<--AI-1 1d(=V.' I'"i L:L i.L 1r'~a`:1 QY+~,J~""
Arterial. The e::xstinq right -_-f way width~ l~~~f ~`kn_ ft.(.is n---)t c-Dnsistent with that specified i.n The Plan. In order to
x.mplement trie Arterial Road Plan it is recommended tf-iat in
additi-Dn t-D the required right of way dedication, a strip of
property Lq,fC_ ft. in width along the (name street ) frontaqe be
~:-}et aside in re-serve. This property may be acqUired by Spclk:ane
f
I. .
. . .
. . .i.. i.. : , . i.. . ,i_ I 'r .
( t~l, y <.a. I t-.' l: .L I I I l•::' r,~ I 1~:~' ~~I °i ~I' l: .t c:l .I J. i I~I''J I' i~ l(.~.' I I ;.A 1"iUTIIi:J
i., 1'" E;' F~? 'f ~
. . .
. ~ . ~ -I E.' ITl c\ )i E' 1. ::a t: ~_t .1. .~.x.J. E.' ~i y E:.' 1. ~'i e 1" V E? 1'- f'1 F c:i
affectinq the si_ib.ject property, inclijdinq property to be
ciedi cated or set aside f-Dr fLiture acqLtisition. Spok:ane C-Dunty
assIAmes no financial r-ibl iqaticin fc)r ad.jUstments iDr rPlcication
reqardinq these utilities. Applicant shoLtld check: with the
-applicable l_itility purveycir and the Spok:ane County Engineer to
determine whether applicant or the utility is resp-Dnsible for
~.zd.justment or rel-Dcation costs and to make arranqements for any
r i F.' r' es't' ;..~.1'" y t.l Y' „
p r::~
, . . .
i._~ ~ . _ t ...i c . , , . . . , , . .
~:!,1'~ .1 t.•_ ~.l Y' E:•. t.~ ~1 Y (::I 1. I i ~..t ~r ~ ~ f'i 'r~~ i::: ! ~ r'~ ' fl e, r J.
:intercl-ianqe with I-90. Levels -_-f 5ervice~at this 1cication are izir
~:I.ill shortly reach Ltnacceptable levels. The applicant shaIl review
tfitm- ciistribi_iticin of traffic from this propc-sal tc- determine wh~.~t
c-r :-i f f i c J. mpa c t s w i 1 1 -c ci_(r f r~ .--.m t h is p ropc-s a 1 t-D t h is i n t erc h an q e.
i
I
PAGE 1 08 58 16 19 MAR 1996
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
~
05832 4TH AV (START) 00 000 HAVANA ST & SPOKANE U 16 PAVED 36 ~
4TH AV 00 120 DEARBORN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 ~
00 240 CUSTER RD (END) U 16 PAVED 14 I
00 370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 470 WARSINSKE AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 500 CARNAHAN RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 670 MCKINNON RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 790 KOREN RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 880 HOWE ST (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 22
01 000 FANCHER RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 22
01 260 EASTERN RD U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
01 450 DAVID ST (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 20
01 520 THIERMAN ST U 17 PAVED 20
Ol 580 ELIZABETH RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
01 640 BR.ADLEY RD U 17 PAVED 20
,
01 780 COLEMAN RD U 17 PAVED 20
01 890 GIR.ARD RD U 17 PAVED 20 '
4TH AV (END) 02 030 PARK RD
05834 4TH AV (START) 00 000 STEEN RD U 19 GRAVEL 26
4TH AV 00 120 FLORA RD U 19 GR.AVEL 26
00 190 COACH ST (END) U 19 PAVED 40
00 270 ARC ST (START) U 19 PAVED 40
4TH AV (END) 00 370 TSCHIRLEY RD U 19 PAVED 40 }
05835 4TH AV (START) 00 000 LONG RD U 19 PAVED 27
4TH AV 00 150 MOEN ST (START) U 19 PAVED 16 ~
00 240 GREENACRES RD (START U 19 PAVED 16
00 490 BARKER RD U 19 PAVED 16
4TH AV (END) 01 000 HODGES RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 16
06045 4TH AV (START) 00 000 FARR RD U 17 PAVED 20
4TH AV 00 230 HER.ALD RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00 380 FELTS RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
00 630 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20 ;
00 700 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 ~
00 880 PIERCE RD U 17 PAVED 20
4TH AVL 00 980 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 `
4TH AV 01 140 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 20
01 230 WILBUR RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 01 290 FOX RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 a
01 360 UNION RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 ~
01 380 UNION RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 '
01 540 WHIPPLE RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
01 630 SR 27 (PINES) U 17 PAVED 20
01 740 HOUK RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
01 860 VERCLER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
01 920 LETA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
02 150 MCDONALD RD U 17 PAVED 20 ~
02 400 BLAKE RD U 17 PAVED 40
02 470 LEATHA LN ( STAR.T ) U 17 PAVED 40
~
02 650 EVERGREEN RD U 17 PAVED 20
02 780 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
02 870 BEST RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
02 940 REES CT (START) U 17 PAVED 20
03 090 WARREN RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
03 150 ADAMS RD U 17 PAVED 20
03 320 BURNS RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
03 400 PROGRESS RD U 17 PAVED 20
I
PAGE 2 08 58 21 19 MAR 1996
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
03 460 ST CHARLES RD (START U 17 PAVED 20
03 580 NEWER ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20
03 660 SULLIVAN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
04 030 CANNERY RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
4 TH AV ( END ) 04 160 CONKL I N RD ( S TART )
05833 4TH AV (START) 00 000 DISHMAN-MICA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM 22
4TH AV (END) 00 240 FARR RD (START) & FA U 17 LIGHT BITUM 22
05836 4TH AV EXT (FOUR LAK 00 000 4TH AV (FOUR LAKES) R 09 GRAVEL 14
4TH AV (FOUR LAKES) 00 100 ELECTRIC AVE
00 170 ELENORE RD
4TH AVE EXT 00 380 ORCHARD HEIGHTS RD (
4TH AVE EXT (END) 00 440 ENDS AT PRIVATE DRIV
05837 4TH AV (FOUR LAKES) 00 000 SPOKANE ST (FOUR LAK R 09 GRAVEL 14
00 070 CHENEY ST (FOUR LAKE R 09 GR.AVEL 12
00 310 4TH AV EXT (FOUR LAK R 09 GR.AVEL 10
00 630 ENDS AT PRIVATE DRIV R 09 GRAVEL 10 '
05838 4TH AVE (START) 00 000 HENRY RD U 19 PAVED 36
4TH AVE 00 050 BILLY JACK CT (START U 19 PAVED 36
4TH AVE (END) 00 200 ASHTON ST (START) U 19 PAVED 36
05839 4TH AVE (MEAD) (STAR 00 000 FREYA ST (MEAD) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
4TH AVE (MEAD) 00 070 MAIN ST (MEAD) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
00 130 MARKET ST R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
00 250 MYRTLE ST (MEAD) R 09 GRAVEL 30
4 TH AVE ( MEAD ) ( END ) 00 380 R.AI LROAD AVE ( END ) R 09 GR.AVEL 30
06266 4TH CT (START) 00 000 WILSON ST U 19 PAVED 36
4TH CT (END) 00 040 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
06267 4TH CT (START) 00 000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
4TH CT (END) 00 040 SHERIDAN ST (MEAD) U 19 PAVED 36
11 Records Processed
I
~
~
~
Traf f ic Counts
Road Name Location Leg Count
EVERGREEN RD at 24TH AV N 3828
EVERGREEN RD at 24TH AV S 03019
EVERGREEN RD at 16TH AVE N 4622
EVERGREEN RD at 16TH AVE S 3086
EVERGREEN RD at STH AV N 5293
EVERGREEN RD at 8TH AV S 5013
EVERGREEN RD at 4TH AV N 6594 `
EVERGREEN RD 105 ft S of SPR.AGUE AV N 03484
EVERGREEN RD 105 ft S of SPR.AGUE AV S 6105
EVERGREEN RD 105 ft S of BROADWAY AV N 02532
EVERGREEN RD 105 ft S of BROADWAY AV S 02806
EVERGREEN RD 105 ft S of MISSION AV S 3217
EVERGREEN RD at TRENT (SR-290) N 06123
EVERGREEN RD at TRENT (SR-290) S 02574
EVERGREEN RD 160 ft S of WELLESLEY AVE N 02546
EVERGREEN RD 160 ft S of WELLESLEY AVE S 06597 ,
EVERGREEN RD (END) at BIGELOW GULCH RD S 12
EVERGREEN RD ( STAR.T ) at 3 2ND AV N 2060
I
I
Traf f ic Counts
Road Name Location Leg Count
4TH AV at CARNAHAN RD (END) E 1847
4TH AV at CARNAHAN RD (END) W 01021
4TH AV at EASTERN RD E 737
4TH AV at EASTERN RD W 2258
4TH AV 160 ft W of COLEMAN RD E 00502
4TH AV 160 ft W of COLEMAN RD W 00335
4TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 01849
4TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 02977 '
~
4TH AV at BOWDISH RD E 02683
4TH AV at BOWDISH RD W 02309
4TH AV at SR 27 (PINES) E 2541
4TH AV at SR 27 (PINES) W 1858
4TH AV at MCDONALD RD E 1941
4TH AV at MCDONALD RD W 1903
4TH AV at EVERGREEN RD E 1766
4TH AV at EVERGREEN RD W 2083
4TH AV at ADAMS RD E 2560
4TH AV at ADAMS RD W 2695
4TH AV at SULLIVAN RD E 3063
4TH AV at SULLIVAN RD W 1656
4 TH AV ( END ) a t FARR RD ( S TART ) E 01432
4TH AV (START) at DISHMAN-MICA RD E 1841
4TH AV (START) at FARR RD E 2281
~
1
Traffic Counts
Road Name Location Leg Count
MCDONALD RD at SALTESE AV S 2679
MCDONALD RD at 16TH AVE N 02646
MCDONALD RD at 16TH AVE S 3575
MCDONALD RD at STH AV N 8281
MCDONALD RD at 8TH AV S 6717
MCDONALD RD at 4TH AV N 10555
MCDONALD RD at SPRAGUE AV N 06528
MCDONALD RD at SPRAGUE AV S 9100
MCDONALD RD at BROADWAY AV N 04364
MCDONALD RD at BROADWAY AV S 05622
MCDONALD RD 55 ft S of MISSION AV S 03638
MCDONALD RD at WELLESLEY AVE N 00306
MCDONALD RD at WELLESLEY AVE S 01526
MCDONALD RD ( START ) at 2 5TH AV ( START ) N 0 2 7 5 9
MCDONALD RD (START) at SR-290 (TRENT AV) N 02143
~
1
~
i
f , ,
SPOKtLl\ JC~ ~OUNJl Y gHJCiAlIl~ ~EXAM11NA`lR
In the Matter Concerning ZE-36-96, Zone Reclassification )
from Urban Residential-3 5(iJR-3 5) to Urban ) NOTICE OF
Residential-22 (UR-22) ) PUBLIC HEARING
)
Applicant Arger Capital Corporation )
TO All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of proposal, as listed
on Spokane County Assessor's records
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ABOVE-
REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW
Heartng I)ate November 13, 1996 T'me 9 00 a m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Proposafl Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22)
and request for bonus density on approximately 18 acres for 40 multi-family residences and those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (LTR-22) zone
Applicant/Owner Arger Capital Corporation, 300 N Mullan Road #204, Spokane, WA 99206
Locatoon Generally located north of and adjacent to 4`h Avenue, approximately 300 feet west of
Evergreen Road in the northeast '/4 of Section 22, Township 25 N, Range 44 E W M, Spokane County,
Washington
Zoning Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
Comprehensede Plan Urban
Environmental Detereninatgon (SEPA) A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issued The
Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency The official comment period ends November 11,
1996
Related Permits 1`1ot Included in Applicatgon Not applicable
D1ViSl0ID 0f BifllldlBlg & PIaIIIllllg 5taff PCt'SOQ Steve Davenport, AICP, Planner 11 509-456-2205
DE'I'ERMINATION OlF
NOlVSIGNIFICArVCE - "D1VS"
SP~KANE ~OUNTY DIVdSYO1V OF BUYI..DING A1VD I'LANNING
RESPONSIBLE QFFgCBAH.,, JANIES L MANSON, DIREC'Z"OR
WAC 197-11-970 and Sectton 11 10 230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIItC}NMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE 1VUMBER(S) ZE-36-96
DESCRIPTICDr1 OF PItOPOSA,L Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) and request for bonus density on appraximately 1 8 acres for
development of 40 multi-family residences and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) zone
A.PPLICAPd'I' Arger Caprtal Corporatian
300 N Mullan Road #204
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 926-5311
LOCATyOIV OF PROPOSAL Generally located north of and adjacent to 40' Avenue,
approximately 300 fe+et west of Evergreen Road in the northeast '/4 of Section 22, Township 25
N, Range 44 E W M, Spokane Caunty, Washington
L~~ AGENCY SPOKANE C4UNTY I]IVISION OF BUILDING .AND PLA,NNING
DETERMINATION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the envuonment An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is anot reqtured under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other infvrmatron on file wnth the lead agency This
information is available to the public on request
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-1 I-34U(2), the Iead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comgnents regarding this DNS gnust be
subinBtted no later than 4 00 p an , November 11, 1996, if they are flnten+ded to alter the
DNS All coinments shoulci be sent to the contact person listed below►
By Steve Davenport, AICP Title Planner II
Phone (509) 456-2205 ~ Address Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Y) ~
Y~A''E IS►~1[JED 1996 SIGI~1A'T~
~
OU1~~ME1T5 REC'ARDING IIWIRON~~TI`AL OONGERNS erV,,;0,7 AT 'IM HFARING
API'EAL, OF THIS DE'I'.ERMTNA'T'ION, after it bec4mes final, may be made to the
SP4KANE COUNTY DIVISIQIt1 OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), ls` Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's
appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the project This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to
make specific factual objections Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you
with the specifics for a SEPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Pat Harper
3 Spokane County Division of Utilrties, Jim Red
4 Spokane County Health District, Steve Holderby ,
5 Spokane County Air Pvllution Control Authonty
6 Spokane County Drnsion of Parks, Recreation and Fa2r, Wyn Birkenthal
7 Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley
8 Spokane County Boundary Review Board
9 Spokane Regional Transportation eouncil
14 Spokane Transit Authority ~
11 WA State Department of Transportation
12 Fire Protectaon District No 1
13 Central Valley School Dlstrict No 356
14 Vera Water & Power
~ o 4 " _ /
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ~
BUELDING AND PLANNLNG
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART g
A GENERAL INFORIVIATION
NAME OF APPLICANTiREPRESENTATNE Arger Capital Corporation
MAII,INGADDRESS N 300 Mullan Rd #204 ,
CITy SPO" „a STATE WA ZIP 9 9 2 0 6
PHONE 9 2 6- 5 31 1 (work) (home)
IF APPLYCANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLiJDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICAtVT TO SERVE AS REPItES]ENTATIVE
LEGAL OWNERS NAME Same as Above PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS . ame as Above .
CTT'y STATE ZIP
PR03ECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 7 8?5 4 0 S qF t+/-
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft)
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45221 9199 & 45221 9200
ASSESSOR PARCEL # S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N/ A
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3-5
EXISTIING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant Land
PROPOSED ZONIIVG UR 22
COMPREHENSNE PLAN CATEGORY Urban adiacent to Commercial
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Val lev
FIRE DISTRICT # 1
WATER PURVEYOR V e r a
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifarruly dwellings
Manufactuced homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Descnbe
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY
B LEGAY./ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO1V INF(DYtMA'TION
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 4/1-4 ad~Sr (2~~p 6 -,K) 2 n~
SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP 25 R.ANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Evergreen Rd & 4 th Avenue
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 165 f ee fi
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
,
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL*.-4 YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Everareen Road
LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROP4SED
4.5= . Q1 qq . N 29068 f_ of w 1 65 ft of E 495 ft of NE 1/4
Qf NE 1/4 S of CM ST R& P RR R/W EXCa-pi h1 _!OS F-e'r-+
45221,9200 . W 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of
S of CM ST P&P RR R/W exc S 20 ft and exc N 290 68 ft
MOL
EXISTING ZONE(S) _ UB 1.5 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ UR 2 2
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'TION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW .
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
N/A ,
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANI'ED9
Parcel to the immedaite East has recently been rezoned to
UR 22 Prooosed 80 unit apartment community to be built
on thbt site, ,
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES?
None ,
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION')
Parcel to the immediate East is already zoned UR 22 for
multifamily ,
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MTTTGATE YOUR PROPOSAL S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE9
None .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATICZN APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PAR'I' II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF VVITH
WRITI'EN VERIFICA'I'I4AI THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY C4N5ULTATiON WI'Z'H THE
AGENCIES IDP.N1'IFIED RESULTS 4F THE PRELIMINARY ClJNSULTATION SHALL BE IIVC4RP4RATED
IN THE PROPUSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL T4 THE PLANNIING DEPARTMENT
FIRE 1VIARSHALL//FIRE DISTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PRiDTECTION DISTRICT I'dOi
B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (EWM (HAVE rdOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATP, WATER SYSTEM AND FACILiTIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTIC7N PUR.PQSES g~
C RECOMIII~ENDED FIRE FLOW Y OR UNABLE T4 CALCULATE NQW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEPIVITIVE AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMTT
APPLICATIQN TIME L /
D REQURREMENTS INCLUDE
r
S~'~'~ ~ ~-I ►~t L
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTITLE DATE
WATER PTJItVEYOR A SA'ITSFACTORY ARR.ANGEMENTS FOIt DOMESTIC WATER AND FIFtE FLaW
REQLTIREMENT5 ( ) {HAVE I'dOT} BEEN MADE
B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS k, mZ~i-R.
~
~c'► ~►a o.-~ct. PJw~Q ~ t'•.. _ ~ 1 -`1 ~
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/T'ITLE DATE
COgJ1VTY ENGIIVEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEPJ FLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEFN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLI ANT
A C(3MMENTS
r•,
~
SIGNAI'[TRElTITLE - - - DA'I'E
' COLTIdT'Y UTILYTIES _
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQURREMENTS FOR
~ f SUBMITTAL 4F THIS PR4POSAL (HAVE) (I3AVE 1VaDT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED
r~ WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE ISf
A COMMENTS t't F,~►`_ 1 cCL-
' TiJREJTTTLE DATE
- - _ - - - - - - -
- - - - - HgAI.rTIif DISTRICT - l ~ -
A PRELIMIRTARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEAT PLACE AND GEPTERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUB11riITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (I3AVE) (HAVE PdOT) BEEN SATISFIED
A COIVTMENTS Pakd c.. ~ (J -e ~r.~- t~-~-- ~ ~ ,
J"~,•t
STGN TLE DATE
SEVNER PURVEXOR -
A PRELIIViINAR.Y DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMEN'TS FOR THE
PRQVISION QF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD K THE APPLICANT
A COMMENTS N '
SI I'TLE DATE ,
~
N 0
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
~ PART III
y~de--S~E ~s fr vi~ S URVEYOR VERIFICATION ~1~
lt
r
ICi~EP1~, LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
mS NING MAP AND W]tITTEN LEGAL DESCRIP'TION
9 b7 ^ ~ 5 - 1~ ~j
~ ..A0 DATE
s
SS N~O PHONE 9I2- o ' 13 Z Z
~ES ~~797 y'GIMd- , Wa1 ZIP
~
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHQRIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR A►FFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A►FFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS W]Et[TTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORLZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF
NAME C-9w.,4wr A/0~ DATE
ADDRESS PHONE j Z4
ekAwa a ZiP
00f?'0
~
. :3
S O APP OR SENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR A►FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS n-VA DAY OF
1996 B Y
`~~~111111l1/~
M C c~F ~
~ ~e'
`NOTA'RlC SEA~<<.~ ~ ~ ~1~ddld._: Q t^--
~ ~ PIOTARY
Notary Pubhc in and for the State of Washington
= PUBLtC ►
Residtng at o
' 3 ~9 ~e~ LIIyIGI~
''i, My appointrnent expires
1111►
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND PLA►NNING)
~
DATE SUBNiITTED IT----V- co FILE # ?E 1 &'9
CA-
DATE ACCEPTED OI 1 Z1 0(C/ BY
r.
TOTAL FEES RECEIPT # ~ a
~.ks4 f u Zc.
,
I
S . ~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11e10o230 -1-
rg,
SPOKANE ENY1R0►QIZNTAL ORDINMiLE
tdaC 197 11 9601 Settion il 10 230(1)
Environmental CheCktlst
File No
Purpose of Checkllst
The State Environmentat oolicy Act (SEPA) cAspter 43 21C RCY reQutres all goverrmental agenctes to consl4er the envlrornnental iioacts of a oroposal
before making Aecisions An Enrironeental Impatt Statertent (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals dith probabie significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environ+sent The purpose of thts checkllst ts to provide informtion to help you and tAe dqency identify tmpacts frda you
D*'o0ossl (and to reduce or avoid impacts from tAe proposal 1f 1t can be done) and to help the egency decide whether an EIS is repuired
instwCtions for Applicants
This environmental chedclist asks you to Eescribe saae baslc lnforsm tlon about your proposal Governmental agencies use this cnecklist to determine
vhether the environmental iapacts of your proposal are siqniflcant reQuiring preoeration of an E15 Ansrer the Questions briefly rith the most
precise infornation knoun or gire the best descriDtion you can
7ou cau t anse+er eacA QuesLlon accuratelr and Carefully to the best of your knawledge ln most cases you should be aDle to answer tAe Questions
from your orn observations or projeCt plens rfthaut the need to I+ire exoerts If you really do not knor the ansaer ar 1f a question dces not apply
to your proDosal arite do not knor or doei not apply Camvlete ansaers to the Questlons noa may aroid unnecessary Eelays later
Soae questions ask about gorernmental requlattorK sucn as zoning snorellne and landmark designettons Answer tAese questions tf you can !f you
I+ave problems the goverraoental agencles can assist you
The cAectlist questtons apDiy to all perts of your proposal even if you plan to do thera over a period of time or on dtfferent parcels of land
Attach aey additional tnfonaation that dill CescriDe ycur pro0osal or 1ts environrtental effects The agency to dhicn you suDmtt chSS checkllst may
ask you to explain your ansmers or provlEe additlonal infor+nation reasonably related to deter»ining 1f tAere may be slgniftcant adverse imoac
Use of chectlist for nonproject oroPOSals
Complete thls cAecklist far nonDroject prooosals eren thougl+ Questions may Oe ansveree dces not aoDlY
IN AOOITION cauplete the SUPPIE!'tENTAI SHEET FOR NOMPROJECT ACTIOMS(Part D)
For nonprolect attions the references in tAe thetklist to the wrds 0rolett a0011tant enE property Cr site snould be read as proDOSai
proposer and sffetted geograDhlt area respecttvely
A BACKGROU1iD
1 yaw of proposed project tf aDVlicable
2 4ame of appl,cant Arger Capital Corporation
) Address and phone nunper of apDllCant or contact person P r o k e y A r g e r
N 300 Mullan Rd #204
Spokane, WA 99206
a Date check 1 ist ore0ared
S Agency reQuestinq checkltst Sookane County Plannin DepartWnt
6 Proposed timing or sc4edule (incluCing Dnesing if appllcable)
7 a Do you have any plans for future aCCltions expension or further activity relaced to or comected etth t1+1s proposai If yes exptain
No
b Do you oirn or heve aptions on land nearby or aEjatent to this proposal' If res explatn
Possibility of acquiring land directly West ot this property
8 List any environmentat infon9atlon you know about that has been prepared or uitl be prepared directiy related to this proposal
Future Level One Report
Rev 2/1/88 1
9POT,ASRr E^4YIIt0t1lVRAL QRDIHANlE
v (VAC 141 11-960) 5 ti 11 1P 230(1)
A BAG1CGRsQHD ( nc 1 au d)
9 []a 7au tmw vlu[her pp11 [f m r p nding f r go rrmsencal Qpc I of ck+e g oeale dir ccly Ef cl g ctu p p t d by r
p p a2 F y sp L 1
No
10 Li c ay g me t ppr 1 psrmir. th t vill be eeded f your pr po al 1 lmovn Z o n e c h a n g e t o
UR 22 from current UR 3 5/B-3
11 Gtv bri f ampl c d rlpti f your pr pasal incl ding she pr po ed uetn n d t!u ais f che pr yect end St "h re e e s l
quoe tioca lat l[hl clee kliet thet k you c d ibe c 1 saym t of yeur Or po 1 You do c d t Dent th nsv thf
P B
42-44 unit apartment cammunitv
Lo tt f k pr p al CS utfi L t t f rucl [ r per co nd t t d th precl I ti f P 0 d p}e c L 1 di E
c dd Sf y d ctlo c vnahip d aege if lcnove+ If pr p s++l tiauld r r r g o pr td th q
D uadarl f th att ( 1 Pr fd 1 g 1 d Spci 1[ plen Yi inlty map nd c p gc Rhi maR t r nabl llabl ~r+t1 ou
hould hmic y pia quir d bv ch g cy You T c quly d t duplf c o.ep o dec !1 d ple hmitt d vtth pernic appll t!a
r La t d t t hi he k 11 t
Legal descriptions Parcels #45221 9199 and 45221 9200
Just West of eorner of Evergreen Rd and 4th Ave
i
~
13 C1ae [h p p d [I 11 1Ch1 [A AquS 5 rmltl 1 ca (A5A) he Ce f 1 S v [ S Tvi R itie P S clt 5 v 5 v! A h
C!t f Sp k.an (5 Sp kaa C ty ASA 0 Lsy Ar. le i bound ri }
ASA# General sewer servlce area ,
/rX'4~ !1~4'M / . ~ ~
! V ~ 4
l
"'CS 8£ CO[C'L.Md 6Y APPLItAN" 6/
B E2qVIRORtER"..B,L ELL%M4TS
luntt or
Ag c 0 ly
i e,~--n
Ge r 1 d ipci f c'+e Lc [ Sr 1 ) fla[ ollirtg hilly ceep l p e m nc i w
th
b rh G L t he [ pe [ I p t he 1 C ( pp r im [ pe e nt o 1 pe } F1 a t
rhac g 1 cyp f ila Eound on the olt (FOr e:ampl 1 y eaud gr 1 pe c auck)
Lf know xhe 1 !f ci f gri ulc al ll peeify ches nd c ny prieoe f rm1 d
~tanc~arc~ Va 7 1
d 4 chere urf indic cicna r hiecorv af rtac bl il i tt+e imm di c i inicq I
d i be -
Not to our Knowledge
(WAC 147 il 960) Sectian 11 Tb 230(1) SPOKAtIE ENYIROHT[EdITAI QRpIMAHGE
B ENYIROPa'IEMTAL ELEHEfiTS(COntinued)
Eveluation For
e Oescribe the Agency Use bn{y
purpose type artd appraximate quantities af any f1111ng or grading proposed
indicate source of f111
N/A
f Cauld erosion oaur as a result of clearing construction or use' If so generaTly descrlDe
NO
g About rhat vercent of the slte corered +eith lmperviaus surfaces after project tortstruc
tian (for example asphal[ or uildln3l}
Buildina covPrac
less than 2n%
el ~J ►1;JA ~
1
- a d
h Proposed measures to reduce ar tontrol erosian or other impacts to the eartA !f eny
PrP-c; Prvun- anr~_ #-np S n i 1
2 AIR
a What type af eroissians to the air rouid result from the proposal (i e dust autcnrohlle odor5
indusirial a0od smoke) during cOnsLruCtfon and rhen Lre proje[t 1s conpleted7 If any
generalty describe and gTVe approximate qunntites 1f knoen
_ During construction dust, automotive, paint
After Construction Automotive
h Are there any off sfte sourtes of eini5sians or odor that rnay afferi your prpposal if sa
generally destrybe
No
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emisstons or other imp8cis to air if any
Limit use of major equipment/tractors
I
3 YATER
a Surface
f11 is tAere any surfate rater body on or in the iamiediete vlclnfty of the site includirtg rear
raund and seasonal streams saltwater lakes poods retlands}' If yes describe type and
provTCe nertres !f apprapriate state vhat stream or rfver it flotls into
NQ
(2) Hill the praje R requtre any work orer in or adjacent to (eelthin 200 feet) the described I
raters' If yes please describe and attach araileble plans
No
3
SPOLAlE LRV'fRO2C'MRiAL OSDLHANC,-
(aAt 197-11 960) Sectioo 11 lb 230(1)
8 ERVIROt1fMNTAL BI.EKEN'S (eo tinued)
Ev luetion For
Agency U Only
(3) E tlmat the eownt f fill nd dredge mt rial clwt vould De plac d in or ewv d fr m th
s rfac vat r or vetl nde ad lndlcace th rea of ttfe site tlwt vauld be ufi cc d Ind1 ate
th eour of lill mac rial
lu/n
(4) W111 che propooal ceQuir ourfaea rotsr withdrawal• or diverolona Clve o general deecrip
ti n purpoae nd apyrosLaace qusntitiea it kaove
N/A
(S) Doea che propoeal 11 vlthin & 10o-yea [lood plalo f[ eo note loucioa on the olte p Lo
LY V
(5) Doea th propo ml tn olve ny dischargeo of vm te mteriale t ourfaee veter■ It eo
d erlEe the type o( vaec nd ncicipac d voluffi ot di chnrge
1~/D
b Ground
(1) vtll groundvi cer De vichdr vn or vill vnc r be diechargod ro grouodvater C1 e g n r 1
d scription purpoo nd npproximace Quantltie• it imovn
pro,ect will utilize standard 208 drainacje
swale to capture on site runoff
D ecribe va c mat ri 1 chec vill ba diochorgod inco the gcwad truo s ptic c nk r ocher
saoicary vaece treacmenc [acilicy Deacribe che general eise of che syaten chs numDer of
h us co be eved (lf spplicaple) r the number ot psreooe the oyot m(e) are e=peeted t
aerve
None. Taroiect is serviced bv public sewer
(7) Deocribe any eyscess otl+er tAan thooe deeigned for the dispoaal of maitaey vmca
in c iled t r th pu pooe f dia harging tluidn belov tRe grwod ourtace (laclude orotemo uch
ae choe tor [he disposol o[ etorm vacer or drainage frvs floor dcaino) Deocribe ttu type ot
syat m the mount of m terlel c be dloposed ot througd tfy eyocem aad the qpeo f materiole
lik ly to be dlapoeed of (lncluding mocerialo vhleh eay eocoi the eyocm imdvarLenily througA
apille or reeult of tir flghcing etioiciee)
Non
(4) Vill aoy ehmleale (enpeeislly orgeaic oolveeco or petrolewa fuelo) be otored ln nbo e
ground or ndergrouad ocorage tsnke If oo vlac typae aod Quencitieo of materiale vill be
e[ored
No
4
9pORAHE @iPIBOAMMAL OBDINAACE
(YAC 197 11 960) Sectloe 11 10 230(1)
8 ERVIRONlERTAl. et.DffiJ"S (conti u d)
E el etio For
Ageacy U Only
(S) V1►at proteetive meeeuree vl11 b taken co laour that leJ te ot eplllo ot ny chemlcale
scor d r ueed ite vtll not b olloved to p rcolat co groundvater (chi lccl de eeeeu
to keep chemlcale auc ot diopo al eyetese d ocribed in 7D(2) end 3b(3)
W-A
c u c c Runoff (including coco vocer)
(1) Deseribe the e ueee of rvnoff (lneludiag atorm vatee) and met4od of colleetloa nd diopoml
!f ny (lnclude quanciti o if iusovn) Vhec vl11 thio uoter flow VS11 thle mc tlov inco
other wacere Si eo d scribe
ZQ$ qrass swale areips will collect & cQnt,aig
runoff from parking, roof areas
J111 ny eheaicsle bo atoced hendleE or uaed on the olte !n a loeetloo vl►ere opill os
leek vill drain co eurface or gro ndvacar or to o etorm vacer diopooal eyat m diseharging to
surfac or grounclvat r
No
C uld v ste moc rlale c r grwnd or oucf omat ro if oo gen t lly d criDe
11T n
d Pr paeed meaeures to redute or toatrol aurfaee grwnd and cuno(I vater tapucts t! •ny (if
t the propooed action llee vlthia the Aqulfar 5 neitive Area be opocia117 clnar on e=plaoatiom
r celstiag to Eaeilitlae eone rning 5 etiono 70(4) 3b(5) and 3c(2) of chio cheekliot)
Engineered desiqned 208 drainaqe plan
4 PLA.T5
'heck or circle cype of getecio (oued on the elce
deeiduoue [ree ald r oapl pen cher
evecgreen tree flr eedet plne other
v htvbs
graoe
paetuce
cr p or gcalu
vec soil plants cactail buttercup bullrush oicumk cabD g otfier
vac r plnnts woter lilly elgraoo nllloil ocher
ch r cypes of eget tion
b wAec klnd nd mwoc of egecocion vill be rmov d oc lt r d a 1 1
c Llec chreacened or endsagered speciee Imown co De on or esr the site N o n e
d Proposed laadacaping ue of nacive plancs oc other oeasureo to preaetve or anhanee egetacion
o cR sltc lf any
Full landscape plan will be submitted to
Spokane County for approval
5
SPQiCANE EMYIROMMEMT1lL OROIHAtiGf
IWAC 197 11 9601 Sectio 11 ib 230(1)
-
B ERYIRONMEHTAL El4?NEMTS (continued) Evaluation For
Aqency Use 0 ly
5 AwIHALS
a Ci cle any birds nnd animals rhicA have been obaerved o o ear the stte a are knoan to 4e on
or near the site
birds hnak heron eagle songbirds other R o b i n s, c h 1 c k a d e e s
rtamnals deer bear elk bearer ather
fish bass salmon trou[ herring she3lfish other
other -
b list any threatened or endangered speties knvan to be an or near the site
None
c Ss [he Site part of a migratian rpute' If sa explain
TTnlrni-,T.Trti
d P oposed neasures ta preserve or enhence aiidlife if any
N/A
§ £NERGY ANO YATURAL RESOURCES
a yhat kinas of enerqy (electrzc atural gas aaod stove solar) ai11 be used to mret tne
the cocrtaleted praject s energy needs? Describe ahether 1t ++111 be used for heeting rnanufac
t ri g etc
Electric heatinct
h uould your praject affect the potential use of solar energy ey adlacent properties tf so
generally destribe
NO
I
c tlhat kinds of ene gy Co servation features are included tn the plans of this proposal ist
oener proDased reeasures to reduce or cont ot energy irtmacts irt any
GOOd Cet1tS F.I]F?rgy P1 an
7 ENVIROtiMEt1TAL HEALTH
a Are there any enviro maental health hazards irtcludtng exposure ta toxic cAemicals isk of fire
and explosion Spi11 or hazardous raste tnat cauld oCCUr as a result of this prapasal lf so
descri6e
NO
(l) DescrTbe special ereergency services that might be required
IVone
6
9PORAaL.ENPIBCMMT!>L OBDTPARCL
(VAC 191 11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
8 E'7VIR0NlERLAL LLMXEN'"S (eoaclaued) Cvaluetion For
Ag ncy Ua Oetly
E17V2AOTilZ2T'AL HEAL'8 (eontlnued)
(2) Propoe d meeaur co reduee or eoncrol enviroameacal health dnurde Si eny N/ A
b ltoi ee
(1) Vhat type• oi noise esiot in [Re area +►bich my aifact yaur projetc (for Qxaaple traffic
aquipment operetion ocher
(2) Vhat c7Pea aad lepele af aoiae vould De cteacnd by ot sasociated utth t M Qrojaec oo a ~
ehort-t rm r s long-c rm Eoola (tor essmple troftic eomcructloo ope[atioa othar) Indicate
vhac houre aolee vouid come from che eite
Construction-Short term 8 OOam to 6 00 pml
construction related noise
~
`V
(7) Propo ed oeaaure to reduce or concrol noiae topaets 1t eny ~
Limited hours ,
s u ro AHD SHORELI 1E USE
a vh c to ch current uoe t th ic and adjaeent prop ctias U A C a t1 t
D tle che eic peea uaed for grieulsure If oo deocriDe N fl .
c Qe crtb y scructut a tha sit N/A
d vtll any scsuctures be deaoliohed if eo vhich N/ A
N'tiat ie the eu t soalag cleoeifieatleo ot the eitet
~
t VAat lo che eurr nt empr Aemive plan deaignatioo of the oice U
g tt epplicable vtiat le the cunent shoreline nw ter Qregrna desigoation ot [he oi[e N/ A
h Hne ea) p ct of che aite bee elaoaifi d e ao anvlro=enull7 eeositive srea Ii ao
epeclfy
No
i Appcozirsocely hw mney peopl vould reaid oe vork in che empleted projacc 5 0_ 8 n
7
SPOKANE IIIYIBUMMRTA1. OSDIPAACE
(uAC 197-11 960) Saction 11 2-0 230(1)
B ENVIRONKM'LdL EI.FJKZRrS (caacisond)
luaci F r
Ag n y t! Onlp
] Appro:imstelq Arn maay p oplc vauld [h eoapl t d proje [ displac N,on
k P opo ed sm u t void o radue diople emetft iapa cs if any N.ZA
1 Pr po ed oesourea to enanra tf4e pr po +1 Le eomqacible vith +aIIiating and projecc d la d ua o aad
plans lE nq
m},P bv 1ar9a _'0arr-p1 t-o
the tas zoned UR 22 of which an aDartment
DT0'12Ct iS
9 HOUSING
AQpraximately hov aa 7 unlto aauld be provided if aayt Indlcato vhsclaar high- oiddlr ot
lorriaeome houeiag
4gz-L-= ~ .4
b ApDroximat ly Mv oany vai[e ii acry vauld ba limiancedt Iadtcat eFmchar higd niddl - r
low inc ma houoing
-n- .
c Pr po d meaeureo C reduce ar cantrol houeing iapacs !t aay N/ A
14 AE5TI[E'ICS ~Nl
1Jh c i th [ 11 t h ight of an7 pr poecd ettuccuse(a) n t iestluding an[ennua 1lhac Ls eRe
principal i Tior huildlag material(s) p=opc• d
V 1 il yj -9iding;„- 7 q c. t~~c 1 7
U t'..
~
vo
D uhac levo in the i=nediae vieiaity vauld be lcarad or hetruec d N~
l
~
~
c Prop aed ma eur e[o reduce or control aeottmtle impacc li aor AT
~7"FY i ~ ~f
_ f U
11 LIGH" AS4g GLARE
o t h a r t q pe o f l i g h t o r g l n s e v i l l t h c p r o q o n a l p r o d u c Aot tiae of day vaild d~c mainl y o r
Parki nrr a.rpa 1 g,cj,t~ duri ng axleni na/nigl^Lt
6 C uld lighc or glor Etroia the flnlahed projecc ba a mfecy ha ard r insert r vitb •LaaoY
N Q
c Vhat :istiag ofi-nit ewrcon of light r gl8re mey ;[i tt yaas propaoal
N0
d Propoeed meaaur e to reduca r oncrol ligl+c aed glare impacte if any -
nT/A
8
SMaRE rN~TLROHltENTAI. ORDIRAHGF
(ciAC 297 il 960) Sett1 a i1zIQ 230(1)
S MAilIA0t8MRidL PIJD02M (contlnusd)
£v 1u841 For
Ag ocy U ~nly
12 RECREA:20N
Vh c d ignated nd infornal eatioosl apportuniciee r i[he laedi c vi inity
None h Yould the propon ,d prosect di pIa ap exiotiag re rsatiooal uae If so d aeti6e
No
Praposed arca urn to r duc ar c ntrol iapacso on r crm tion iocluding rec eaito ml o¢p rtuni
ci so lraee pravided Qy the pr I cc oc pplie.anc if aay
13 HI5-t3RIt AND CULTVRAL PRESEtIVA`IOH
Ar [he[ any yl c e r b] t lioted oa r propooed for m t1 m 1 csc lot 1 p rv
cion r giacere kn uss to be on c n sc to the it Li gan xolly d scribe
b Ge r liy d ac iba ay landnarko or •idence ot hlstorlc [ch ologi al sc]entifi r culc r i
!mp rc e imow tc bc a oc ni C the ni[e
Prop ed maa u co c duc or concral impncts tf sa7
N/A
14 -£.AAtJ5A0R"ATION
Idencify p blic t eets ad hlghvaya rving the ai[e and desctibe p poaed c na t he
xi ring atreet q tea Sh w-on eti DLna if oy
Rxie-a,~ rPen Rc3 an 4th Ave ~
n ~ -
kr' ~
b t it cur ntly arvad by puhli [ronntc If not vlvst la the ppro:lm t di t c he
ncar t tranalt top
YP~
ilav many parking apncea vould the eompleted pra}eec have 8or aecy vauld the projeet e1lsrSaae
st n d Will the propoaai r quir nT oed raado r ocreat r impravaemec s ezieting r md r ocreac
c includiag drivea,eyad if o genarally da cribo (iadicaca vheche public or privi ce)
Ri n r7 f ~
ll
i
1ii11 the p ajecc uee (or ecur in the immdlnCt vicieiCy f) wacar to11 or air Cieaspcttacioc
If ea gcaarally deacrlbe
N0
9
SPORAHE ERVIHO#GD7LAL OBDIAAHR
(YAC 197 11 960) Seecloa 11 ID 230(1)
8 IIiRIAORKENlAL B,EffirLg (cantimead)
2v.lustion Por
Ageoq Uoe Only
t Hov oany vehieular tripe per dor vould be geneeated by the eample[ed ptojeet If lmovn
indiea[e vhec peak vould occur
t WO
f
D
g Propooed meaouree to reduee or eoatrol [raneportaticn lapaeta !f an)
e~-
/
15 P(18LIC SERVTCES U ~
o aould the projeet rasult in an loereaoed nead tor public oorvieae (iOr emaIIple iire proteecioa
poliee protaetion health eaee echools other)T If oo ganerall~ daoeriba
No ~
tN.4A*&* A
D Proposed veaouTea to reduco or coetrol direet lmpneto an puslic oecvic o 1 ony
N/A
16 lf'ILI-TES
Circle utill curr etlr av iLsbls c the oit octrici~ nacur 1 geo ~ Cetuoej
eerviee elephon eaffrZary eewe eeptlt s7retem otlfer
Phone - US West electricity - Vera
Sewer - Spokane County Cable - Cox
b Oescfi~ `Cf~1~~t111t1eY ~i+St~ere propoutd tor th. 9r,joctRe~f u~ey p~oviYs~~ ~ex~iGa a bage
the eneral conecruccioa aetiviciea oe the oite or lo the iaeediece vieinit7r vhleh aighe ba
ne ded
-5.ea, ~..~.o.
C SIGNATRRP
i che underaigned ovm r under cha pemlry o[ perJucy chec tho above rmspoe9eo •re mnde teuthfully aed to tAe Dmot of mr Icaovledge I eloo
und rscnnd chac elould there bs op villiul mloreprao nc tion or villlul laek oI full di clooure oe my p rc the oReney may vtthdr v np
d c rnlnacion ot aom igaiflcaoc tMC Sc aigAt leous in relianc upoo thlo el+aekliat
Det ~~G oc AR&-agw,
(Flemo PTiac or rqpa) ~
Proponent Addrese .3Q~ il"A /v Acde
Sigmt e)
PAone429 ~4? °°i/ 6
~
Pereoa eompletias form pata
Phoae
FOR STAFP OSE OALY
Sceft mmber(e) revleving ehecrlisc
Based an thio revlev of che onmntal eheckliat aM other pertine nioemstlon the etaff
A thec there are no probaDle sigaificant adverae iapnct• and ceeammoodo a dateemtoacioa ot nonaignifleante
H Concludee thuc prohable oignifieaet adveroe anvironmantal impaeto do ezisc for ths currenc propoaal nod recoaaende o nitigated decer
mimtion ot noneignifieance vich eondiciom
C Goneludeo that chere ere probeAle eignilleaot adveree eavironmensnl lapatto and secomeodo a deteemlootioa oE oignlfieanee
iIL211G PU - $75 00
10
I! ~
~ . .
.
,
ry "0
~a
P co Ii ~ r,-q E (:3 iLf l,4 -r Y
I3E1'AR'IMENT OF BUILI3ING AND PLANNING • A DIVTSION OF THE I'UBLIC WORKS DEPAR'FNviENl'
JAMES L. IVIAhfiSON, C.$.O., DIRECLOR DENrars M. Scarr, P.E.. DIRECTOR
MEM(7►RANI)i]M RECTti/Ea
TC): Pat Harper, 5pvkane County Division of Engineering MAR 1 & W6
Jim Red, Spokane Cvunt}r Utilities Department
Steve Halderby, Spokane Counry Health Dis~ict
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County pa.rks & Recrearion Department
Bi11 Hemmings, Starmwater LJ'tility
Greg Figg, Departrnent of Transpartation
Glen Miles, Spokane Re,gional Transpvrtation Cauncil.
Christine Fuestan, Spakane Transit Authvrity
5usan Winchell, Bvundary Il.eview Board
Central Vail.ey School Distr%ct
V+era. WaGer District
Fire District No. 1
FRQM: John Pederson, Seniar Planner
DATE: March 18, 1996
RE; 7Ane Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) tv Urban
Residential-22 (CFR.-22)
APPLICATION ACCEPTAItiI'CE ANI? I)ESIGN REVIEW ME TING
NiARCH 27, 199b AT 1;15
COUNTY PLANNING, CQNFERENCE R~OM, 2NI1 FI&QR
.
Please review the above applicativn and use the auached APPLICA'I'ION ACCFPTANC'E A.ND ~
DESIGN REVIEVV NIEE'I'ING F4RM fve yvcir commeiti cs. The Divisian vf Building annd
Plartning enct3urages yaur presence at Lhis meeting. fi'he sponsor and representative have
been inviterd to also attend. If you can not attend, please fvrward your review comments Qn
the attache.d form to Lorne Lakshas for the meeting. The attached APPLICAT'ION
ACCEFTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FC7►RNiS wi1l be giverr to the spvnsor at the meeting and
included in the Divisivn of Building and Planning file (sv bring thr copies to the
meeting). Thanks fve yaur caopera.tian. If you have any questions about the applicarion,
please contact L.orne Lakshas af the Divisivn of Building and Planning at 455-2205.
c: Greg Arger, North 3(}01V1ullan, Suite 204, Spokane, WA 99206
Attachments: Applieatian Acceptance and Design Review Form, Praject Design, 5ite Plan
1026 WEST BRGIADWAY AVENUE •SPad.',ANE, WASH[NGTDN 99260
BUILl7ING PHONE; (509) 456-3675 • FAX; (504)456-47n3
PLANMNc PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509)45b-2z43
TDD: (509) 324-3166
,
' .
Design Review for March 27, 1996 ~it 1.15
Zone Reclassification fror11 Urhan Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
ReS1CleIlilal-222) (UR-22)
Generally located north of and adjacent to 4d1 Avenue, approximately 300
feet west of Evergreen Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 22, Township
25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washin g fo I l.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service
Area (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for a46 inu 1 c i-
family residences and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22
(LJR-22) zonc=.
I'ARCLL IvVIV1BI;R: 4522I.9199, .y2(K)
SITE SIZE: Approxunately 78,540 square feet
APPLICANT: Greg Arger
North 300 Mullan Road, #204
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 926-5311
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Lorne Lakshas
~
r J
~ ' . ' • t -
~
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
Z4NE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
. PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE: Arge r C a p i t a 1 C o r pora t i on
MAILING ADDRESS: N. 300 Mul lan Rd # 2 0 4
CITY: S-nnkamin STATE: WA ZIP: 9 9 2 0 6
PHONE: 9 2 6- 5 31 1 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Same as Above PHONE:
MAII,ING ADDRESS: S ame as AbovP
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 78,540 SqF t+/-
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) .
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 4 5 2 21 . 91 9 9 & 45221.9200
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N/ A
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3. 5
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY V a c a n t L a n d
PROPOSED ZONING UR 22
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban adi acent to Commercial
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Vallev
FTRE DISTRICT # 1
WATER PURVEYOR Ve r a
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single faznily dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings ()o
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREYIOUS PLA,NNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
B. LEfzar./ZQ.N-E RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION:
d..rDCATIGti GF PRUPOSAL:
s:CTIGti 22 70WtiSHIP 25 RANGE 44
N.=LME Ga- ?L-BLIC RUAD(S) FkOVIDLtiG ACCESS: Evergreen Rd 8 4 th Avenue
:•'~JIH
CtF pRcr pEkTy FRr~~-TLti G Gti Pt,BLIC ROAD: 6 5 f e e t
1
,
. ZONE RE+CLASSIFTCA APgLICATIUN Page 2 vf 4
DC}ES THE PROFOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ART'ERIAL OR PLANNED ARfiERIAL*,-4 YES NO
NAME{S} UF AR`T'ERIAL ROADS EverQreen Raad
L.EGrAL DESCRIMON (3F PR+C7PER'TY F+QR EACH ZOI"J'E RECLASSYFICATTON FRflPOSED.
452 23 g1 9-9 - N 290_ 6A ft of w 165 ft of F 495 ft of NE 1 I4
of NE 1/4 S of C'M ST R& P RR R/W
45221.92DO : W 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE 1/4 of NE 'd /4 of
$ of CM ST P&P RR R/W exc S2Q ft and exc N 290.68 ft
MOL
EXISTING Z(]NE(S) rlg -4~ TO PROFOSED ZONE(S) _ UR 2 2
FOR THE FOLLC?WING DESCR.TBEi)
PRQPERTY. (ATTACI3 LEGAL DESCRU'I'ION STAMFED BY LANT] SURVEYOR flR FRQVTDE
BELOW.
IF YOU UO NOT H€3LI] TiTLE TU THE P'RC3FEFt.TY, V4HAT IS YC3UR INTEREST IN IT? -
N/A
W'HAT ARE THE CHANGED GflNDITIQNS OF'I`HE AR.EA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL W D7
Parcel to the immedaite East has recently been rezaned to
UR 22. Proposed SO unit apartment cvmmunity ta be built
on that s~.te T
WHAT ThIPACT WII.L THE PR!C}PUSEI] ZC'1NE RECLASSIFICATIlJN HAVE t3N THE AI]JACENT
PRUFER'TIES?
None
WKAT FA+CTORS STJPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFTCA,.7'IC3N?
Parce3 ta the immediate East is already zoned UR 22 for
multifamily.
WHA►T MEASURES I)[) YOU PRt]POSE TO MITIGA'TE YOUA PROFt]SAL"S IMFACT fJN
SUK.ROtJNDING LAND USE?
None
~
.
a ZCJNE RECLASSIFICATI+DN APPLICATI+C}N F'age 3of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION t]F THE APPLICATTON WILL FRaVII)E THE PLANIVIIVG DEFAR.TMENT STAFF WITH
WRI1'TEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APFLI+GANT HAS HAI] PRELIMINARY CONSULT,ATT[]N WITH THE
AGENCIES IDEN'TIFIED. RESULTS C3F THE P'RELIMINARY CQNSULTATIUN SHALL BE INCClRP4RATED
IN THE pR(3P05AL BEFORE FIlNAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNINC"r I3EPAR"I`NNIENT.
,
FIRE MARSHALLfFiRE DISTRICT
A. TH1S p~~~~SAL ~~~HIN FrRE P~OTE;~~~ ~~~TRIcT No. 1
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS {+~kW (HA'VE NUT) BEEI"+T NiAUE TO MEET Ot.7R NEEDS
IirT PRC?VIDING FC}R AhT ADEQUATE WATER S'YST'Elvf ,AND FACILITIES F(]R FIRE
PRt?TECTIUN PURP(JSES.
C. RECOMMENDEU FIRE FLOW: _T6 P ; OR T.TNASLE TC7 CALCULA'I'E N(]W
BECATJSE C7SE IS NOT DEFTN1TIViE; AND WILL BE DE'TERMINED AT BUILL)INfi PERMTT
APPLICA'TiON TIME.
n . REQv~REMErirs IvCLunE: ?Ad br~ A/Y drt ol ,t/1-- (s ~
.Sc.F?D tt( 3-~►~~~
FTRE DISTRICT SIGhIATUREMTLE DATE
WATER. P'URVEYQR A. SATISFACTC3RY ARRANGEMENTS FOR.17ONiE5TIC WATER AND FIRE FLt7W
REQUIREMENTS (HA~*E) (HAVE NQT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTSf+COMMENTS:
`'J ~'-c~,1r.~ r,,;'~,S-+,~.. i+~ l~ 2 ~ . ~ , t'~> . • 1 ! -
WATER DISTRIGT SiGNA►TUREfTITLE DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEEN PLACE ANI3 GENERAL REQiJTREMENTS FC3R ROADS
AND DRATNAGE H.4VE BEEN I7ISCU5SED WITH THE APPLI ANT.
A. COMMENTS:
_ ~ - F ~
, ~ ~
SIGNATtJREffITLE DA'i`E
CQUNTY UTILITIES
,A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN FLACE AND GENERAL REQLTIREMENTS FOR
~ J SUBN1ITTAL C3F THIS PRaPaSAL (HA'YE) (HAVE ,N4T) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNAT'ED
WATER PLTRVEYOR FOR THIS SITE JS
~
h
~ A . ca:~L~~~~s: L, s 6:'T fx,
ATi; RFJ'I'!7"LE DATE
_
HEAL Tff UIS? KI[:"r
: ~r - -,.ry',.~ ~ : ~ _t:-`~ %'4_'.!`~ r w'~~✓ ',i, ~Lt~r_'lr~~~'.iL•.'w`IS F~~k
_ _.►.,f~: -1-7 HAVE HAVE tiOT) BEE.'ti SATtSFIED,
.sf j, 5Rf i.f~► . i~ ~ ~~'l 4 ~.-t,' ~ ~
. {
f
SIGNA4-RFfI ITLE QATE
SEWEk PUkVE'YUR
r"uSaIr.J"* H.-=.-S "1"AKE.N F'LACE AND GEtiEkAL REQUlFZEI'vJEN7S FUR `I"HE
O: r'LBLIC ~EN~"Ek ?.kE 1 "NDERSTC1'UD TTH.E APYLICANT,
Y ~
r"Ji•i~*E r- T y
si . . Errr-rLE DATE
~
.
. . ZONE RECLASSIFICATIvi-4 APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PA RT I II
1,~5 E;
wAsr, , SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
ICi~EP~►, LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
S TI-iE NING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
-,s4 ~ DATE:
; 3 ~ , .
SS: PHONE: 9I2gb 3Z Z
..;ES 7.17, 57 Wa • ~ . ZO~
zIP: ~
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR A►FFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURT'HER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR TFE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTTON, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWTTH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
NAME: C-gr&*19).0 Af G'&Z... DATE:
ADDRESS: .3geP QC" PHONE: j 44
~ • ZIP: 77~.~
ool?"
S O APP OR SENTATNE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
1996, B Y 1
~ J
'~,•~;~CC
. NOTA.Rf SE~
~•9~
~~iARY v :v
- : : Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
~ . i ~ ~ • -
V ~
. ~ ~ Residing at:
My appointrnent expires:
,
PART V
~fJ CfJ-1i~'._...~7=rJ B, Y THE DIYLSION OF BL"ILDLtiG A.ND PLAMNIIr'G)
J.l ~ ~ i JJr •i/ 1 I LE
~-1 . 1►~~w:L~. ~ 7
A,
1 - . 0:
- - ' + ?'LA~LJr !
r
~
~r
IfS~'OKANE COUNTY D~.VISION OF ,
-BUIIeDENG AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A GENEItAi, gNFORIVIATION
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE Arger Capital Corporation
MAILING ADDRESS N 300 Mu 11 an Rd # 2 0 4
CIT'Y spokang STATE WA ZIP 9 9 2 0 6
PHONE 9 2 6- 5 31 1 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WItITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
LEGAL OWNERS NAME Same as Above PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS S_aMe as Above
CITY STATE ZIP
PROTECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 78,540 S qF t+/-
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft )
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45221 919 9& 45221 9200
ASSESSOR PARCEL # S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N/ A
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3" 5
EXISTTNG USE OF PROPERTY V a c a n t IU-Ugd
PROPOSED ZONIlVG UR 22
COMPREHENSTVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban ad3acent to Commercial
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Vallev
FIRE DISTRICT # 1
WATER PURVEYOR Vera
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single family dwelhngs Duplexes Multifanuly dwellings (A
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industnal ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) Descnbe
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIWOLVING THIS PROPERTY
B LEGAVZONE 1tECLASSIFICATION INFOIZMATI()N.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 44
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Evergreen Rd & 4 th Avenue
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 165 f e e fi
r
~ a
ZOl`M RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL t)O YES NO
NAME(S) OF AR'I'ERIAL ROADS Everareen Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE REC'LASSIFICATION PROPOSED
4.5??l Q1 q9 _ N 99Q_ FS ft- nf W 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE 1/4
of NE 1/4 S of CM ST R& P RR R/W
45221 _ 9?,nn w 165 ft of E 495 ft of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of
S of CM ST P&P RR R/W exc S 20 ft and exc N 290 68 ft
MOL
EXISTING ZONE(S) rjg TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ UR 2 2
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
NiA
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDTI'IONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED9
Parcel to the immedaite East has recently been rezoned to
UR 22 Proposed 80 unit apartment community to be built
on that site.
WHAT IMPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON TFE ADJACENT
PROPERT'IES
None
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION?
Parcel to the immediate East is already zoned UR 22 for
multifamily
WHAT NiEASURES DC YOU PROPUSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PR4POSAL S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE?
None
.
. ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART H
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WIZITT'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~
B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS ( (HAVE 1VOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUAT~TER SYSTEM AND FACILIT'IES FOR FIRE
PROTECTTON PURPOSES
C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE AND V1ILL BE DETERMINED AT BUII.DING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME
D P46binYe 47~~ ~ ~ (S
REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE
Sc.r?1~ F.A&Z
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (MAAW) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE
B REQUIREMENTSICOMMENTS
~
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE . DATE ,
COUNTX ENGINEER
A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLI ANT
A COMMENTS
~
1 ~ J /
a
SIGNATURE/TITLE DA'I'E
COUPITY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS F(JR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS
A COMMENTS
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS
3- A2 - y~
SIGN REfTITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DI5CUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR T'HE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT
A COMMENTS
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
« d
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATfON
I THE UNDERSIGNED A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
REQUESTED FOR THE ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SIGNED DATE 3- 7' ~16
ADDRESS Z~I 0 (2-L PHONE
~-b Kan~e- ►WA ZIp ~~JZOb
PAItT IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I THE UNDERSIGNED SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUI'HFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION OR IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERNIISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/FER
BEHALF
NAME
DATE
ADDRESS PHONE j Z4
~ ~ • ZIP
. ' ~ --7
S O APP OR SENTATNE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFF]CRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
2\\ 1996 B Y GrCL\c~ &A CG P~)fa e r(
~~~I11111//~~
4. ti' CC`.,//i
a~
` NOTAR~'~ SEko~ ~ ~ ~ LL A ' k ( ~I G~
- i j OiARY
= ~ Notary Public in and for the State of Wastungton
~ f .'9 LIC
Residing at ll o t) z_
My a
ppointment expires /y ~G~ -7
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DMSION OF BUII,DING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTED FILE #
DATE ACCEPTED g y
TOTAL FEES RECEIPT #
- ~ MTT CENTER PASSPORT ~
Datc: Number: t~
Name Phone
Address
Commcnts:
CUSTOMER ROUTING ~S o2 o? arj
Division of Buildin~dt Plarutin~ Division of Bu:s~~•ildin d~ P1uuu . '
. . .
~r~. ~
~
v: :•rr:~• .......................vv.~::: :•.::::.:v::.::::.:~::
. . : .:r: :..,.}•:.:i}:v:.} :•:i:.:::::::::..::::
aaI+{ .r•
~ry~~ .Q.yl S:r:
Q}~/} rr
~~{w ♦
..~`h.. . •
~~iM~•fF~JM~M••~'•::::: i..::;.;:~.,::.:~:~i:•:::::.
.::;`~;:t ~ . . . . .
( Addressing FlAdmin. Exception o Approach Permit
I Building Permit ~ Actaial Rd Plaa Info ~Fiood Ptain Pamit
Codc Infamation ~ Binding Sitc Plan Info ~ PubticlPrivatc Road,s
I
1 Canmercial Rcvicw ~ Cat of F.xanpaoa ~ Rres. Bldg Permit Rev.
Confaence ~ Canprehauivc Ptaa ~ Sitc Drainaga Iafo
~ Energ,, c~c Info F]c«W. Use Permit ❑ SubdiVLiion Review
~ F'sre Safcty Review ~ Noncanfaming Use ~ LJb7ity Pamit
I Manufactuc+od Homa ~ Parmit Review e
~ Shorrlines Info c ~
I Mxhanical Pamits
I Olha Pamits Shat Plat Iafo ~ NO FEEREQUIRED
Reviewer 'time out ,
I Plumbing Pamits ~ Subdivision Info
, Ptivsts Road Info F]Tamp. Use Permit I Residcn6al Revicw ~ Variance Appl. ~ APA Paymeat
I Sewec Pamits El Zom Choclc ~ Cat. of F.xcmptioa
I Infamation ~ Zam Info ~ Subdivisioa Reviaw
FlULIDrSe Iafo
Zone ChaW Roview
NO FEE REQUIRED _ NO FEE REQULRED
It,eviewcr T'une out Rcviewa Tune out Ravicvrer T"nne out
aTVvAsspoaLcM 7Acnc
I
• .
_
PERMIT CENTER l SCiriEDULE • ~ - A -tx~7.rt . .
. .
....r. . :
:>::>:::::::<:.<:>:::.:::>;~:.
. . . . . . . . . . : : ;
. D, ~P TMFI::.;>::.~;: . : , .
. r~t
AIVN[N .
,
- -
RII'`'ION OF WORK
S~ # iJNITS OS'C DCSC
C
x
em ~
6 ertificate Ption Pre-197
f E
28 $8
5 C o
:«::::<:::;:.:;:~<::::
29 $84 Between S ~ 10 Actes ~C.~IP~:#~.~::::::.~::•<:»:>................
Ad'ustmcat
M'nor Lot I.~ ~
'ae
~
30 84
$I
31 ~ $73 ~ All Others ~
77 $101 IConditional Use Permita Deaendent Relative
76 $354 Private Dor, Kennel DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
80 $384 All Others = or < 10 Ac. _
152 S 169 1 Ea. Add' l. 10 Ac. PLANNING
78 $34 IConditional Use Permits - Ren Deaendent Reladve
791 $56 1 All Others
105 $75 lEnvironmental Checklist
60 $67 Home Profession Peranit ~
153 $84 Ea. Add'l. 10 Ac.
146 $34 Pre-Coaference Fee Admin. Exception ,
1481 $34 Conditional Use
143 $34 Nonconformint Statua _
144 $341 Temporarv Use Permit
1471 $34 1 Variance
61 $253 ITempotarv Use Permit 1
74~ $899 1 Variance - After Constructioa $O - $100,000 ,
:
75 S 1348 1 Over $106,000
73 $600 lVariance - Before Coastrucdon ~
1541 .P11 IMulti-famil Uaits - er unit Each A artment t
. .
Rt~ { ..AR'E ~1'1E~!,~.~r~:`*- BN INBBR
E~
E01 $30 Administrative Variaace
E02 $50 A eals
~
. .
~
.
. ,
. . : .
~
. ~
~ ,.z ~..i.
, . ,i:~ ~;i~
~ : .
.
. .
.
_ _
~
.
.................:££`1~1' ..d:
.
- _ . . . . .
E05 $50 ChanQe of Conditioas Plat
E06 _ $50 1 Zone
, E97 $50 Conditional Use
F.26 $30 DesiRn Deviation
.
E~4 $75 lEnvironmental Checklist
*-^-^-~---ry
_ . .
f:,. . , . ,
r
:
. .:.:~~tf:;_: .~00~: ~.i\ti..~........,....,i~c;~::~:'.•':
. ~~...t 1i
i
~
„
~
~9$
. - . . CU .
. . _
. . . , ~ :
. .
~
~ ~,1(•. •.1•:
Q ~ n^
r~,}~~ i:?:- ~
K•:~•
~ . . . . . . . . . i: ~ : .
: .
{ :•:S': ~:F~~-~.-:;:::::•
v. . .
] }(~~y{~Q - ~ : . : . ~ : . s : : :
:::v,...:::::
-.r~I.:~:: -:::~•:::::'::::~:':':'i::~:::::' I
E10 $200 Preliminarv Bindinz Site Plan
Ell $200 Preliminary Plats Lona
Ell S 100 I Short
E23 $100 Fi nal
.
....r..:.
. . . r ~ . ~
: .
. ~ ,~c• : r:.~•::;::::::::,:... ..~;,,~;:....:;,,~1
~~:a
•.t::.::.: . '
r>.,•r•:r: $ 8:~:~ ~I`f~lf~....~.....~..,:...:..~..~~....~ .
~r~
:
_ ~
•~::,r,:: r:::~:~•:~-::z:::
..t.. ~ " ::::.:.~.::::::..i.....
f•~~~ .
~ r. . • .v
•.t.. f:::•~~:~ }:o-: ~.n
_
.~i~:~: Y :?::a. ~.''~:.Q~~1Cb.t1t~::~~i~.~~:~~ ~..'~k~ :4 ~;~~1~?:::=:`v:~:;;z~;;;::; i~
E14 $50 2 Lot Admia. Division
E15 $50 Variance UTILITIES _
. .U 8~ ~
El2'~ 'i'I32~~~ .
7"'1 W. 2 . . ~ • .
E17 -~L S200 ZoninR Pcrmit
E25 ~ $10 ~ NS F CharRc
Road Fund Amt
.,wr-r:.,. ~ . .
FZ§, IMisc. ~ ~
U01 $20 Certificatc of Exemption Review
UOl , T $20 I.and Use Action Review ~
(l2l28R~
Al/1SiM/PASSP0R4.8C1C
RECEIPT SUMMARY
• " ~
TFtANSACTION NUMBER: T9600406 DATE: 03/12/96
APPLICANT: ARGER CAPITAL CORP PHONE=
ADDRESS: 300 N MULLAN RD #209
SPOKANE WA 99206
CONTACT NAME: GERGORY ARGER PHONE=
TRANSACTION: RE-ZONE- ENGINEEERING, LAND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCUMENT ID : 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
CONMENTS: PARCEL N03.95221.9200 & 45221.9199
FEE & PAYMENT SUNMAFtY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAI, DUE = 220.00
TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
03/12/96 00001693 1389 220.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU
2z-Zf-4~
~ r
S P O U N T Y
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER MICHAEL C. DEMPSEY, CFIiEF EXAMINER
April 28, 1998
David and Susan Scott. P. O. Box 183, Veradale, WA 99037
Neil Francom, South 404 Evergreen Road, Spokane, WA 99260-0050
Denny and Peggy Lapikas, 13823 East 5" Court, Spokane, WA 99216
Karen Cone, East 13620 3`dAvenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Albert and Eileen Tams, East 13604 4" Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Phil Bruni, South 311 Evergreen, Spokane, WA 99216
Margaret E. Johnson, East 13907 4" Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Lynette Bailey, East 13306 6h Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216 ~
Sue Mathis, East 13614 3dAvenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Jim Scott, South 2312 Bolivar, Veradale, WA 99037
Walter W. Johnson, East 13907 4`hAvenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Scott Engelhard and 13ob Brueggeman, Spokane County Division of Engineering
RE: ZE-36A-96, ZE-88A-80
Dear Parties of Record:
Please find enclosed a copy of a letter dated April 23, 1998 (with attachment) from
Gregory Arger, on behalf of the applicant, which letter responds to my previous letter
regarding traffic concerns at Evergreen and Fourth Avenue for the above project.
Last week I accepted a telephone call from Mr. Arger, who wanted to know if Iwould I
entertain approval of a retirement center on the site, which he felt would be more
acceptable to the neighborhood and would have considerably less traffic impact than the
general multi-housing project presented at the recent hearing in the above matter. He
explained that he had recently received an inquiry from a developer of retirement
housing, who expressed a strong interest in developing such a project on the site. Mr.
Arger's letter explains that he would still need the 136 units, density and building heights
proposed earlier to make the retirement project economically feasible. Mr. Arger also
told me over the telephone that the design of a retirement center on the site would differ
somewhat from the current design, with the retirement center probably occupying the
center of the site, as is typical of such housing. If the retirement center does not work
out, Mr. Arger would agree to do a traffic study for the general multi-family project.
However, he needs an answer on this relatively quickly, to avoid losing the retirement
center proposal.
~
Ttti[m FLrVr. PuIiuc WoRxs Buti_DiNc
1026 WE:ST BIZOAD4VA1'AVGNUfi, S('C7KAN[i, WnstiitvcTotv 99260-0245
Pfi0Ne: (509) 324-3490 • FAL (509) 324-3475 • TDD: (509) 324-3166
. ~
Request for Comments
ZE-36A-96/ZE-88A-80
Apri128, 1998
Page 2
The purpose of this letter is to solicit your interest in Mr. Arger's proposal. Most people
find a retirement center to be much more appealing than a comparably sized general
multi-family project. If there is substantial interest in this alternative, I will expeditiously
schedule a brief public hearing to consider the same. I am also by this letter requesting
the Spokane County Traffic Engineer to consider promptly evaluating traffic safety
conditions at the intersection of Fourth and Evergreen, in light of the number of accidents
that have occurred at such intersection recently and over the past few years, as discussed
in my previous letter. The Traffic Engineer should indicate whether the County is
willing to do this, and how soon it could be done. Please be advised that last week my
office was advised by Susan Scott and by Neil Francom of yet another accident occurring
at this intersection, this time a three-car injury accident occurring on the afternoon of
Apri123, 1998. See attached copy of facsimile dated 4-23-98 from Susan Scott.
Your comments must be in writing and received by the Examiner's office no later than
May 6, 1998. Documents may be sent by facsimile at (509) 324-3478. This includes the
response by County Engineering.
~ Very truly yours,
r W c . &2~
Michael C. Dempsey
Hearing Examiner
c Gregory Arger, 300 North Mullan Road, Suite 204, Spokane, WA 99206-6806
Francine Shaw, Division of Building and Planning
Enclosures