ZE-0013-96
~
BEFORE
THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF RENEWAL OF ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUE-1-96 ) CONCLUSIONS AND
) DECISION
THIS MATTER is a renewal of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to the Spokane County
Zoning Code, on the 18'h day of September 2002
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1 The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for
rendenng the decision by the Director of Spokane County Division of Planon g
~1/
2 The original proposal consisted of a Zone Reclassification (ZE-13-96) from Urban
Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Rural Residential-10 (RR 10), a Conditional Use Permrt
(CUE-1-96) for an inert waste landfill, and a Variance (VE-4 96) from the ten (10) acre
minimum lot size requirement specified by Section 14 606 240 (11)(a) of the Spokane
County Zoning Code The original land use action was approved by the Spokane County
Hearing Examiner on August 26, 1996
3 On January 15, 2002 the Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted Phase I
Development Regulations to Implement the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
(Resolution #2-0037) On May 7, 2002 the Board of County Commissioners adopted
revised Phase I Development Regulations to correct minor wording, typographical and
cross-referencing errors (Resolution #2-0470) As specified by Section I of the above-
described Phase I Development Regulations, the previously established Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) zone was re-designated as Urban Residential-7 (UR 7) on
January 15, 2002
4 Spokane County Building and Planning Condition of Approval2(b), per the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision dated August
26, 1996, provides for admmistrative renewal of the Condrtional Use Permrt by the
Division of Planning
5 The subject Condition Use Permit was administratively renewed by the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning on September 29, 1999 until August 26, 2002
DECISION
Based upon the above noted Findtngs of Fact and Conclusions, this renewal of CUE-1-96 is
hereby APPROVED for three (3) years, specifically until August 26, 2005 All condrtions
imposed shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the
property, heirs, assigns and successors This decision is final unless appealed in writmg,
consistent with adopted appeal procedures
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
All previous imposed Conditions of Approval specified in the Spokane County Hearing
Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision of August 26, 1996, the Division of
Building and Planning administrative renewal dated September 29, 1999, still apply, together
with the following updated conditions
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
2 a [Amended] a renewal request shall be submitted by July 26, 2005, accompanied by the
appropriate fee Any advertising costs associated with renewals shall be at the expense of
the applicant
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
11 [Added] Dedication of 30 feet of right-of-way for the extenslon of 44`h Avenue is required
Approved the 18`hday of September 2002
Pederson
enior Planner
Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner If you desire to file an appeal, you must submit the appropriate
Appeal Application together with the required Fee, payable to the Spokane County Division of
Planning, wrthin fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this deciswn is signed Upon receipt
of a complete appeal application, a public hearing will be scheduled
If you have any questions, please call the Division of Planning at (509) 477-7200
C aSp:o~k~an_.._s.~LounE~ ij~v ►si,n aWen&Mtneeril a cl Raads
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Management
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility
Spokane County Fire District No l
Spokane Regional Health District
Inland Asphalt Company
Findings and Decision CUE-1-96 2
~
RECEIyEp
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAlVIINER AUG ~ 61996
~neu►zg
RE In the Matter of a Zone Reclassification
from the Urban Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5) )
Zone to the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) ) F1NDINGS OF FACT,
Zone, Conditional Use Pernut and Vanance ) CONCLUSIONS,
Applicant Inland Asphalt Company ) AND DECISION
File Nos ZE-13-96/CUE-1-96/VE-4-96 )
1. SIJMIVIARY OF PROPOSAL ANU DECISION
Proposal: Zone reclassification from the Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) zone to the Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10) zone, a conditional use pernut for an inert waste landfill, and a vanance
from the ten (10) acre rrurumum lot size requirement specified by Section 14 606 240 11(a) of the
Spokane County Zorung Code
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions
U. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Heanng Exarruner has reviewed the vanous land use applications and the evidence of _
record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions
A. GENERAL INFORIVIATION:
Applicant Inland Asphalt Company
5111 East Broadway
Spokane, WA 99212
Address: Inland Asphalt Company
c/o Jana McDonald
P O Box 3366
Spokane, WA 99220-3366
Agent: Dwght Hume
107 South Howard, Suite 325
Spokane, WA 99204
Location: Generally located north of 44`hAvenue, east of and adjacent to Sands Road in the
SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Legal Description: That portion of the SE 1/4 of the SW '/4 of the SE '/4 of Section 33,
Townslup 25 North, Range 44 EWM, lying southwest of the nght of way conveyed to the
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 1
u
Washington and Idaho Ra.ilroad Company, and the nght of way conveyed to the Oregon Railroad
and Navlgation Company
Zoning: Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Urban category of the
Spokane County Generallzed Comprehensive Plan The proposal is also designated witlvn the
Pnonty Sewer Service Area, the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the Urban Impact Area
Environmental Review: A Deternunation of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division
of Building and Planning on Apn15, 1996
Site Description: The site is an abandoned sand and gravel pit, covenng approximately 5 5
acres and having a tnangular shape The sides of the pit slope steeply to a depth of 50-65 feet
below grade The subject prt is contiguous with the grade of a gravel pit to the south, wluch is
currently being utilized as an inert and demolition landfill known as the Chester Landfill The site
ls located within the 100-year floodplain Standing water and an old well are present in the
bottom of the pit The site is bounded to the north and east by a railroad track, and to the west by
Sands Road The site has approximately 635 feet of frontage on Sands Road The property is
entirely surrounded by a six foot cyclone fence with three strands of barbed wire
Surrounding Conditions: Access to the site is provided by Sands Road, which is
designated in the Artenal Road Plan as a Mnor Artenal Sands Road connects to Bowdish Road
and Dishman-1Vtca Road to the north, and intersects 44L~ Avenue at the southwest corner of the
site A commercial day care and old cemetery lie west of the site across Sands Road The area to
the south and west is otherwise developed with residential subdivisions, and is generally known
as the Ponderosa area of the Spokane Valley The Painted Hills Golf Course lies east of the site,
east of Dishman-Mica Road and north of Thorpe Road The srte is surrounded by Urban
Residential-3 5 (CTR-3 5) zorung
Project Description: The proposed site plan illustrates a staging area for disposal
operations at the north end of the site along Sands Road and a possible staging and dumping area
at the south end of the site adjacent to 44thAvenue A small office would be constructed on-site
The operations/management plan submitted by the applicant indicates that concrete, asphalt, clean
fill dirt, glass and bncks would be accepted at the site The reclamation plan subrrutted by the
applicant states that it would take approximately 380,000 cubic yards of matenal to fill the site,
and provides for filling and reclamation of the site in phases over a 21 year penod Sewage
disposal would be by portable toilet or on-site septic tanks and drainfield The proposal would
also be served by a public water system The applicant is required to obtain a solid waste disposal
and facility perniit from the Spokane County Health Distnct, and a floodplain pernut from County
Engineenng
B. PROCEDURAL INFORIVIATION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Chapters 14 402, 14 404, 14 605, 14 606 and 14 706
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 2
Hearing Date and Location: May 1, 1996, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower
Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
Notices: Mailed Apnl 11, 1996 by applicant
Posted Apnl 9, 1996 by applicant
Published Apnl 11, 1996
Compliance The notice requirements for the May 1, 1996 public heanng,
specified by statute and the Zorung Code, have been met
Site Visit: Before and after public heanng
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Exanuner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure)
Testimony:
John Pederson, Seruor Planner and Steve Davenport
Spokane County Division of Building and Planrung
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Scott Engelhard and Chad Coles Jana McDonald
Spokane County Divislon of Engineenng and Roads 5111 East Broadway
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99212
Spokane, WA 99260
Dwight Hume Larry Guthne
107 South Howard, Suite 325 13419 East 32"d Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204 Spokane, WA 99216
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Sohd Waste
Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (1992), Spokane County Zorung
Code, Spokane County Code, Spokane County Health Distnct Rules and Regulations for Solid
Waste Management and Handling (1988), Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-
0294 Also included are the conditional use permit and vanance decisions in Division of Building
and Planrung File Nos CIJE-5-87/VE-5-87 and VS-52-89/CUS-30-89, relating to the Chester
Landfill
Procedural IVlatter: The record was left open after the public heanng until May 8, 1996, for the
subrruttal of addrtional wntten comment on the County Englneenng condrtion of approval
requinng a 1 5 inch asphalt overlay for Sands Road Correspondence was tunely received from
the applicant and County Engineenng on this issue On May 6, 1996, the County Health Distnct
subrrutted a memorandum to the Heanng Examiner indicating that demolition asphalt is
considered an "inert waste" by the Washington State Department of Ecology
On June 4, 1996, the applicant provided the Heanng Exam.iner vvith a copy of a
memorandum from Spokane County Utilities dated August 16, 1989, which indicated that inert
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 3
and demolition landfill sites were considered to be exempt from the provisions of the Spokane
County "Flow Control" Ordinance On June 4, the Heanng Exanuner by wntten memorandum
(with attachments) requested legal advice from the County Prosecuting Attorney's Office on the
applicability of the "flow control" provisions of Chapter 8 56 of the Spokane County Code to the
proposal On June 21, the Heanng Examnner issued a letter opiruon indicating that the proposal
would be approved, subJect to condrtions and subject to the entry of formal wntten findings,
conclusions and decision
Pursuant to a letter dated July 2, 1996 to the Heanng Examiner, the applicant requested
clanfication or modification of certain conditions On July 8, 1996, the Hearulg Examiner
responded to such letter in wnting On July 15, 1996, the applicant subrrutted a letter indicating
the resolution of certain issues with the owner of the Chester Landfill
All correspondence referenced above is hereby incorporated into the record
C. LAND USE ANALYSIS
In considenng a rezone application, Washington law provides that (1) there is no
presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant must prove that conditions have substantially
changed in the area since the property was last zoned, (3) the rezone must bear a substantial
relation to the public health, safety or general welfare, and (4) the views of the commuruty
regarding the rezone may be given substantial weight by the decision maker, but are not
controlling Parkndee v Seattle, 89 Wn 2d 4543 462 (1978) Spokane County Zorung Code
Section 14 402 020, paragraphs 1 and 2, indicate that the pubLc welfare, changed conditions and
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan are relevant cntena in considenng an amendment to the
official County zorung map
The vanance and conditional use pernut applications must specifically meet the condrtions
and requirements set forth in chapter 14 404 of the Zoning Code, and RCW 36 70 810 The
proposal must also comply vAth the provisions of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act
(chapter 43 21 C RCW) and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11 10 of the
County Code), the requirements of the Zorung Code and other applicable land use regulations
The following findings of fact and conclusions are made
1 The proposed zone reclassification aenerallv conforms unth the Comprehensive Plan
A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the heanng body in making a rezone
decision Belcher v Kitsan Countv, 60 Wn App 949, 953 (1991) General conformance wrth
the comprehensive plan is sufficient to support a rezone Bassaru v Countv Comrrussloners, 70
Wn App 389,396 (1993)
The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunrty for a
"citylike" environment, served by a lugh degree of public services and facilities It is pnmanly a
residential category of single-family, duplex and multifamily uses along with neighborhood
commercial, light industnal, and public and recreational facilities Mining, intensive commercial
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 4
L
and heavy industnal uses are not considered compatible within the Urban category Buffenng,
landscaping, screervng or performance standards are recommended to rrutigate the differences
between uses in the Urban category that lie adjacent
The Natural Resources section of the Comprehensive Plan states that mineral resource lands
should be reserved and utilized for mineral extraction purposes, provided their development is
compatible with current srte usage or lies wrthin the Agncultural, Rural or Industnal categones of
the Comprehensive Plan The Natural Resources section indicates that muung operations should
be buffered from existing or potential developments wrthin the viciruty, and provides for site
reclamation after extraction operations are completed Thus section also emphasizes the need to
safeguard the Spokane-Rathdrum Praine Aquifer ("Aquifer") and the surFace waters of the county
from such operations
The subject property was previously rruned in conjunction wlth the Chester Landfill site
While presently unsuitable for residential use, the site could potentially be reclaimed for residential
use if the proposal for an inert waste landfill is approved if the proposal is not approved, the
chances of reclaiming the site are slim because the slte was abandoned before regulations
requinng reclamation of rrvrung areas were adopted The abandoned pit site is unsightly and
could pose a danger to trespassing children in the vlciruty if not reclaimed The proposed landfill
operation, as conditioned, appears well-buffered from the single-famtly neighborhoods located to
the west and south It is noted that similar landfill operatlons have been conducted at the adjacent
Chester Landfill slnce 1987
The Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone proposed for the site is designed to implement the
Rural category of the Comprehensive Plan, by establishing a rural setting for large tract,
residential life style It is a transrtional zone from agncultural pursurts that are no longer the
highest and best use of the land A landfill can be allowed in the RR-10 zone with a conditional
use permit The RR-10 zone is the only residential zone in the Zorung Code which permits
landfills, and is also the least intensive zone that allows landfills The RR-10 zone would not
allow further rrurung operations on the site
The proposal is consistent with the locational cntena of the Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan ("CSWMl'") adopted by Spokane County "Inert" landfills, as opposed to
"demolition" landfills may be placed over the Aquifer, if approved by the Spokane County Health
Distnct pursuant to rts adopted Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management and
Handling See CSWMP, subsection 10 6 2, at p 222 The conditions of approval for the
proposal require the appllcant to obtain a solid waste disposal srte and facilrty pernvt proposal for
operation of the proposed landfill from the Health Distnct This w111 also assure consistency
with the Utilrties section of the Comprehensive Plan, which indicates that solid waste disposal
should not create a public nuisance, cause a public health hazard or pollute the surrounding
environment
Due to its reclamation aspect, the proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 5
1
2 Conditions in the area in whuch the vrooertv ls located have chanized substantiallv since the
nronertv was last zoned
In applyuig the changed cucumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opiruon, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property rtself The Zorung Code references changes in "econorruc,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone Spokane County
Zorung Code Section 14 402 020 (2) Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts Bassaru, at 394
Recent cases have held that changed circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed
rezone implements policies of a comprehenslve plan Btarnson v Krtsav Countv, 78 Wn App
840, 846, Save Our Rural Envlronment v Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983)
Beginrung in the 1950s, the subject property and the adJoining Chester Landfill site were
mined as one parcel for gravel and sand extraction At some point, the site was divided into two
parcels in separate ownership In 1967, the site was rezoned Agncultural under the now expu-ed
Spokane County Zorvng Ordinance, as part of a larger rezone of the area for residential
development The Agncultural zone of the Zorung Ordinance authonzed sarutary landfills by
condrtional use pernvt, but required a ten (10) acre mirumum parcel size
In 1981, the Comprehensive Plan was adopted In 1986, the Zorung Code was adopted to
implement the Comprehensive Plan In 1987, a condrtional use pernut was granted for an inert
and demolition waste landfill on the Chester Landfill site, along with a vanance from the ten (10)
acre minimum parcel requirement of the Agncultural zone The Zoning Adjustor's decision
approvulg the Chester Landfill proposal recogruzed that there was a need to reclaim small pit sites
in the county that had become exhausted from a muneral resource standpoint In 1991, the zonang
of the subject property crossed over to the Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) zone of the Zorung
Code, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code
In 1992, the County adopted the CSWMP This plan specifically recoguzed that demolition
landfills could be located over the Aquifer, under the pernutting authonty of the County Health
Distnct Since 1991, the Ponderosa area and the Spokane Valley area have undergone
continuous growth, creating a greater need for reclamation of the site The Waslungton State
Department of Ecology and County Health Distnct have recently recogruzed asphalt as an "inert
waste" under applicable regulations that can be safely landfilled over the Aquifer
The above discussion indicates that sufficient changes have taken place in the area since the
property was zoned Agncultural in 1967, as well as since the 1991 cross-over zorung of the srte
to the Urban-Residential-3 5 zone, to ment rezorung the srte as proposed
3 The nrovosal bears a substantial relationship to and is not detnmental to the public health.
safetv and eeneral welfare
General consistency with a local government's comprehensive plan is relevant in deternuning
whether a rezone bears a substantial relationshup to the pubhc welfare Bassaru, at 396-98
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 6
As noted, the proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan There was virtually
no public opposition to the proJect The day care operation located to the northwest is fenced
from traffic on Sands Road The nearest residence is more than 300 feet from the srte One
resident of the area expressed concern that local wells would be polluted due to the presence of
the well in the bottom of the gravel pit and the potential dumping of contarrunated matenals in the
landfill However, the record indicates that this well will be cased and used as a morutonng well
The applicant also testified that the water table in the area lies below the gravel prt and the static
level of water in the well Under the conditions of approval, the applicant will only be allowed to
deposit inert waste at the proposed landfill The anphcant also subrrutted credible research
indicating that asphalt can be safely landfilled as an inert waste
The proposal was generally supported by public agencies The applicant will be required to
comply with the County's floodplain regulations and obtain a floodplain development pernut from
County Engineenng The apphcant indicated on the environmental checklist that it would repair
any areas of the site where Plouf Creek was seeping into the site, allowing runoff outside the site
to naturally drain away The applicant also proposed to backfill and stabdize the slope pnor to the
beguuung of operations This would address concerns expressed by County staffthat the adjacent
railroad track might be undernuned by erosion of the adjacent gravel pit wall As noted, the
proposal will reclaim a former mirung site and may eventually allow for residential development of
the subject property
The applicant disputed the County Engineenng condrtion of approval reqwring that the
apphcant place a 15 inch overlay on Sands Road from Dishman-1Vlica Road to 44t' Avenue, pnor
to operation of the landfill The overlay is needed to rnltigate the probable impact of the landfill
on Sands Road, for the reasons cited in the Hearing Exarruner's June 21, 19961etter opiruon The
overlay need only be extended from the north entrance to the proposed landfill, if that w111 be the
only entrance and dumping area for the slte
Concern was expressed at the public heanng by the owner of the adjacent Chester Landfill
that no public dumping be allowed for the proposal until the Chester Landfill site was filled and
had been reclwmed Division of Building and Planrung File Nos CUS-30-89/VS-52-89 indicate
that the Chester Landfill is approaching a grade level to the surrounding terrain and that the
existing pernuts will expire on November 1, 1997 unless renewed The Heanng Exanuner agrees
that the public interest would be served in restncting public dumping at the proposed landfill to
encourage prompt closure and reclamation of the Chester Landfill The July 15, 1996 letter from
the applicant to the Heanng Exanuner indicates that the appllcant and the owner of the Chester
Landfill site have reached an accord on this issue The Heanng Examiner finds the proposed
settlement of the issue to be suitable and will incorporate the points agreed on into the Division of
Building and Planrung conditions of approval for the proposal
The Heanng Examiner also finds rt appropnate to impose a few additional condrtions on the
proposal, relating to the dally operation of the landfill These conditions are guided by the past
history of the adjacent Chester Landfill and the conditions of approval imposed by the Zorung
Adjustor over the years to rrutigate the impact of landfill operations on the surrounding residential
area These are summanzed in the Heanng Examiner's June 21, 19961etter opiruon and have
been added to the Division of Budding and Planmng conditions of approval
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 7
4 The Drooosal complies with the orovisions of the State Envlronmental Policv Act and the
Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance
No sigruficant, probable, adverse environmental impacts were identified dunng the
environmental revlew process or at the heanng of the proposal The procedural requuements of
Chapter 43 21 C RCW and Chapter 11 10 of the County Code have been met No basis exists to
alter or modify the Deternunation of Nonsigruficance issued by the Division of Building and
Planrung The environ.mental concerns have been rrutigated through the conditions of approval
5 The Dromsal. as conditioned, complies with the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone, the
Snokane Countv Zoruniz Code and aonlicable land use repulations AQproqnate izrounds exist to
annrove the reauested vanance and conditional use oernut
A landfill is pernutted as a conditional use in the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone The
Heanng Exarruner finds that the cntena in chapter 14 404 of the Zomng Code for issuance of a
conditional use for an inert waste landfill on the site as proposed have been met, based on the
analysis provlded in the Divrsion of Building and Planning staff report The Heanng Exanuner
also finds that the cntena in chapter 14 404 of the Zorung Code and RCW 36 70 810 for issuance
of a vanance from the ten (10) acre lot size required by section 14 606 240 (11) have been met,
for the reasons cited in the staff analysis
The proposal, as a landfill accepting only inert wastes, complles vvith section 14 706 140 of
the Zorung Code (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The Heanng Exanuner disagrees in part
with the wntten interpretation of the Divrslon of Building and Planiung, expressed in the March 6,
19961etter from Steve Davenport to the applicant regarding the mearung of the term "sarutary
landfill" under such section of the Zorung Code To the extent that a new landfill in the
umncorporated area of the county would accept "demohtion wastes" that are not also "inert
wastes", as defined m chapter 173-304 and Spokane County Health Distnct Rules and
Regulations for Solid Waste Management and Handling, the landfill constitutes a"sarutary
landfill" that cannot be placed in the Aquifer Sensrtive Area See CSWMP, subsection 10 6 2
The apphcation of the "flow control" provisions of chapter 8 56 of the Spokane County
Code are unclear, as discussed in the Heanng Examuner's June 21, 19961etter opuuon See also
discussion on pages 224 and 240 of the CSWIVIP The applicant vvill simply be required under the
Division of Building and Planrung conditions of approval to comply with the provisions of chapter
8 56 of the County Code, as applicable
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings and Conclusion above, the above applications for a zone
reclassification, conditlonal use pernut and vanance are hereby approved, subject to the condrtions
of the vanous pubhc agencies specified below
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 8
~
Failure to comply with the condltions below may result in revocation of these approvals by
the Heai-ung Examiner Such approvals do not waive the applicant's obligation to comply the
applicable requirements of other agenctes with junsdiction over land development
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1 The proposal shall comply with the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone, as amended
2 The conditional use pernut issued for the proposal expires on August 26, 1999, unless
renewed under the following terms
a A renewal request shall be subrrlltted by July 26, 1999 accomparued by the
appropnate fee Any advertising costs associated with renewals shall be at the expense of the
applicant
b The renewal may be admuustrative unless the Division of Building and Planning
deternunes a public heanng review by the appropnate Heanng Body ls necessary The renewal
shall be subject to review by a11 agencies onginally involved All regulating agencies may impose
new conditions of approval consistent with any new federal, state or local regulations
Accordingly, the proposal does not have grandfather nghts with respect to conditions of approval
which may become outdated or outmoded by changes in the law This also recogruzes that the
landfill operation may have to cease for regulatory reasons or due to the economic impact of such
regulations at the time of any given renewal Agencies may wish to impose new conditions at any
time and notlung in this pernut's intent would prohibit the same
3 Any change to the approved operation/management andlor reclamation plan sha11 be
subject to erther a public heanng and decision, or an adrrurustrative decision with notice given to
property owners witlun 400 feet of the total underlying ownersh.ip and the nght to appeal such
decision clearly spelled out in the notice
4 If the Division of Building and Planrung or Heanng Examiner finds violations sufficient to
warrant reevaluation of the conditional use permrt, ttus permit may be suspended or revoked
pursuant to Section 14 404 102 3 of the Zoning Code
S If dunng the lif'e of the landfill new regulations are adopted by federal, state or local
agencies, the operation must immediately comply with such regulations It is the intent of the
conditional use pernut to not allow operations, practices or procedures which would not be
allowed by a new operation at any given time
6 Spreading of top soll and seeding shall occur as any portion of the fill reaches firushed
grade, consistent with the approved reclamation plan
7 The proposal shall comply with the approved operation/maintenance and reclamation plans
as modified by the conditions of approval
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 9
J
8 The Drvision of Building and Planrung sha11 prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
conditions unposed as a result of approval of a land use action Tlus Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice
should be recorded unth.in the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released,
in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Plantung The Trtle Notice sha11 generally
provide as follows
The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] ls the subject of a land use action
by a Spokane County Heanng Body on [ imposing a vanety of special development
condrtions File No [ ] is available for inspection and copying m the Spokane County
Division of Buflding and Plaruung
9 The Division of Building and Planrung shall file wlth the Spokane County Auditor, witlvn
the time frame allowed for an appeal of the Heanng Examiner's decision herein, including any
lapsing of the appeal penod, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows
"Pnor to the issuance of any buflding pernut for any building or any use on the property
descnbed herein, the applicant shall comply with Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay
Zone) of the Spokane County Zoning Code The property which is the subject of tius notice is
more particularly descnbed as follows "
10 The Spokane County Divislon of Building and Planmng shall prepare and record wrth the
County Audrtor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road nght of way and
utilrties The Title Notice for the reserved future acquisrtion area shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Division of Building and Planrung at the appropnate time The notice should be
recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following
a At least 10 feet of reserved future acquisition area along Sands Road for road nght
of way and utilities, in addition to the existing andlor newly dedicated nght of way along Sands
Ro ad
b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zorung Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area
c No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drauifield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisrtion area for road nght of way and utilrties If any of the above
improvements are made withui this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when
roadway improvements are made
d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be pnvate property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parkulg, surface
dralnage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered intenm uses
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 10
e The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "intenm" improvements
at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquinng said future acquisition
area
11 Reclamation of the srte shall include a minimum of one (1) foot of topsod
12 The landfill shall be closed on Memonal Day, July 4, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day,
Chnstmas Day, New Year's Day, and on weekends No landfill operations, including the
receiving of waste, dumping, clearung or grading shall take place on the site between the hours of
5 00 p m and 8 00 a m on any day of operation
13 The Heanng Body may, if needed, impose additional dust control measures at the srte on
the applicant, following notice and a pubhc heanng, including a requirement that the surface of
the site between the public roadway and the active dumpmg area be paved
14 The Division of Building and Planrung may require the muffling of heavy equipment used
at the srte, as practicable, if needed to rrutigate noise complaints by property owners in the
vicuuty
15 Only "inert wastes", as deternuned by the Spokane County Health Distnct and/or the
Wash.ington State Department of Ecology, of the types listed by the applicant in the
operations/management plan, may be accepted at the landfill The applicant shall not allow the
disposal of contaminated matenal at the landfill
16 Dumping by the general pubhc is not allowed at the site dunng the uutial three (3) year
term of the conditional use pernvt, unless the adjacent Chester Landfill reaches capacity pnor to
expiration of such three year penod This restnction does not apply to matenals received from
the existing or future customers of Inland Asphalt Dumping by the public is otherwise allowed
after such three (3) year penod expires and the condrtional use pernut is renewed
17 The applicant shall comply with chapter 8 56 of the Spokane County Code
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
1 Access pernuts for approaches to the County road system shall be obtained from the
County Engineer
2 Applicant shall subrrut drainage and access plans for approval by the County Engineer
3 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bndge construction, and other applicable County standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertinent to road standards and storm water management in effect at the date
of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 11
4 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requu-ements are found in
Spokane County Resolution No 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to ttus proposal
5 The regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program shall be observed, since the
proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone A floodplain development pernut shall
be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area
of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Code Chapter 3 20)
6 No construction work is to be performed withui the existing or proposed nght of way until
a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road nght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
7 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Sands Road as an 80 foot Minor Artenal The
existing right of way width of 60 feet is not conslstent wnth that specified in the plan In order to
implement the Artenal Road Plan a stnp of property 10 feet in width along the Sands Road
frontage should be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the
time when artenal improvements are made to Sands Road
8 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities erther underground or
overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for
future acquisrtion Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities The apphcant should check with the applicable utilities and
Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether the applicant or utility is responsible for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
9 The County Engineer has prescnbed a 1 5 inch asphalt overlay for Sands Road pnor to
operation of the landfill The overlay shall be extended from Dishman-Niica Road to the north
entrance of the site shown on the site plan of record if the south entrance to the site shown on
the site plan is used for disposal operations, the overlay shall be extended to 40 Avenue
10 Trucks hauling to the site shall not use 44~' Avenue or Sands Road to back up and access
the site
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utdrties, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Englneer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the
use of a portable toilet may be authonzed
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 12
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolubited
6 A solid waste disposal srte and facility pernut will be required for the operation of the
landfill
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 A covenant agreement shall be signed stating The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest
agree to authonze Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petrtion for the formation of a
IJLID by petrtion method pursuant to RCW 36 94 wluch the petition includes the owner(s)
property and further not to object by sigrung of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID
by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which includes the owner(s) property
PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any
assessments(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the
formation of a ULID by erther petition or resolution under RCW 36 94
2 Any water semce for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All air pollution regulations must be met
2 Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions dunng demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled This may requue use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers or
suspension of activity dunng certa.in weather conditions Haul roads should be treated, and
em.issions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled, as well as enussions from all
other construction related activrties
3 SCA.PCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e, ingress, egress, parlang areas,
access roads) be paved and kept clean to mirurruze dust errussions Traveled surfaces/access roads
within the proposed "pit" should be treated vvith a dust palliative at intervals frequent enough to
control dust errussions Dunng unloading, transfer of matenal and other activities, measures must
be implemented to control dust errvssions
4 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto
paved surfaces If track.ing or spllls occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately
to clean these surfaces
5 Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i e, construction waste, garbage, office waste, etc )
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 13
.
DATED ttus 2 6 tZday of August, 1996
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
r
1Vlichael C DemPseY, WSBA #8T35 ~
Chief Exanuner
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the Heanrig
Exanuner on an apphcation for a rezone is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days
from the Examiner's wntten decision, a person of record files an appeal with the Board of County
Comnussioners of Spokane County, Washington The Board wnll hold a closed record heanng under
the procedures adopted in Resolution No 96-0632 Followmg the closed record heanng, the Board
may affirm, reverse, modify, or remand the matter to the Heanng Exanuner The appellant is
responsible for the cost of prepanng the transcnpt of the public heanng and the official record
Pursuant to Resolution No 96-0171 and Chapter 36 70C of the Revised Code of Washuigton, the
decision of the Heanng Exanuner on a vanance or condrtional use pernut appllcation is final and
conclusive unless wrtlun twenty-one (21) calendar days of the issuance of the Heanng Exarruner's
decision, a party with standing files a land use petition in supenor court The date of issuance of the
Examiner's decision is three days after rt is malled, as provided in Chapter 36 70C RCW
,
(This Decision was masled by Certified Mail to the Applicant on August , 1996)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-96 Page 14
•
j
ProjcLtStatus Active ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
A5 Bu'lt Pl°ns Rcceivcd Rezone Fi1e ZE-0013-96
Fio3d 1'lans Approvcd Campunior) Fiics: YE-0(K)4-9t, Ct,3E-0001-96
'Veµ- Road Stnndards 5-15-95 Mylar R,elatcd F;ies: VS-0052-84
Ilcaring: OSJUV I)96 Building Urpt:
TcchnicalRcvicw: 02121119,96 01:15 TR#: DRT.f-l?2-y6
Prcliminary Rrvirvr. Type: Cargr Lot Aldg. Squnre reet
D3tc itcccrvcd: 0210711496 ?~o. Lots: 0 Nn. Actes: 5.5
Project Name UR-3.5 'fU l2it-10/ C UIV LAND FILL INLANU ASPHAI.T
Sicc Addttss N. 44"1'11. tit' !)lS13MAN A4lC'A. F. tiAN[)S,
Rangc-Township-Sactiun: 44 • 25 - 33 PARCEL(S}: (frrst 20)
Applicant Canditicxu Mailed: 45334.9455
lana Mcdanald F1ood ?.one Ycs
f VL.1ND ASPHALT CO Wnter Suurce
5111 E. Broadway Scwc:r Sourcr
SI'OlCANE, WA 99212- Schaol Oist 356
llh°ne Firc Dist 1
(509)534-6221
rnonc nist
Owqcr
(NI.AND ASPHALT COMPANY
5 111 C. Broadvvay
S['()ICAN E. WA 9~1212
t'tia»e
I ';;'J9) 5 3 7
I3uilding Ph: 477-307 5 ; Nlann:ng 477-2205 C:unlac► i"I EA"L DAVL!vPUK'I
llate Submitte DescriPtion Initials
Eng Nced Tcchntrally Compltle Eng Nced Harvard Rii Mitigation
Eng Ncrd Drainagc Plans Eng Nced Trrffic Annlysis Eng Nced Othcr
Eng Pay Fm Rcccivt-cl Eng Finai Plat Fcrs Complatcd
Eng F'nonty Fccs Rrccivrd Copy to Accounung
Noticc ta Pubiic / Notict to PubtiC # 1 3 4 6 Cumplctu! - or Nruis w be siped
1")esign Ikviatian Qatcs (In-0ut)
, ~ I I
i I I l 1 1 1 / ITe-n-7 quunt~esTur
drairwgc item culculated
0&2611999 Hearing Daie Uecision Approvrd App Den Cond Appld BCC ~
Appralyd to BCC Dci:isian App Dcn Cond Appld Court
Apprzlccf ta Court Derision App Den Cond Appld
, Stanipui Mylars to Sectietaty (Sandy)
/ tiLimped 208 1 nt E'ian; tn Sr:rctan• i5:incfy ~
J
p• . County Public Works,
Transportation • ' e • ' •
1 • • County • ee •
Memo
To John Todd
From Scott Engelhard
Date 9/24/99
Re Request for renewal of Conditional Use Permit, CUE-1-96
Prior to renewal of the Conditional Use Permit or use of the property as proposed
1 Dedication of 30 feet of nght of way for the extension of 44"' Avenue is required
. . REcE/VjjD
' ! ~ AUG 11 _
~ ~
.
S P O K A N E j_ - C O U N
S[.'II_DfNI, A,4JU PIAINNNG . A DJVLS[ON OF THE PUBUC WORKS DEPqR'i'MEM
James L. Mansan, C.B.O., Director G3ry (.~)org, Dircctor
MEMORA.NDUM
DATE: August 11, 1999
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Pat Harper,
c/o Sandy Kimball
Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; Bill I-Iemmings
Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sim>
Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
Spokane Regional Health District
Spokane County Parks, Recreatiun & Fair, Steve I lorohio~~~sk- i
Washington State Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchcll
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane County Water District No. 3
Central Valley School District No. 356
Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles
Washington State Department of Transportation, Greg Figg
Spokane Transit Authority, Christine Fueston
WA State Department of Ecology, Heidi Renz
WA State Department of Health
WA State Dep :r:rient cf Natur^. Re-icurces, Chuck Gulick
WA State Llepartrtment of Fish & Wildtife, Kevin Rohinette
Spokane Regional Solid Waste System. Dale Arnold
Unioii Pacific Railroad
FROM: J. Todd, Planner
S UBJECT: Request for renewal of Conditional Use Permit, CUE-1-96
Please review the above-subject request submitted by Inland Asphalt Company and
provide your written comments and recommended updated conditions to me by August
25, 1999.
If you have any questioils regardin~~, this marter, voU can contact niz at 477- 3675.
wc
Enclosure
Copy without enclosure to: Inland Asphalt Company
Dwight Hume
1026 W. BROADWAY • SI'()1CA1`E, WA5HIhC;TUN 49260-007()
PHCINE: (509) 47I-3675 • FAX: (549) 477-470:; • TDD- (509) 324-:166
.
PHONE (509) 534-2657 ~ J CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION #IN-IA-NA-'304K5
, FAJC (509) 534-9787
Inland AsIrDhalt Company SlNCE 1934 .
r ~ -
~r~►~' 5111 E BROADWAY • P O BOX 3366 • SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99220-3366 ~
July 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
Z 254 788 548
Division of Building and Planning
SPOKANE COUNTY
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Renewal of CUE-1-96
To Whom It May Concern
This letter serves as notices that Inland Asphalt Company is requesting to renew
the conditionai use permit referenced above The permit is for an inert landfill
located at 44th and Sands Road
If you have any questions or need additional-informatiori, please do not hesitate to contact myself at 533-0238 or Randy Wild at 536-2627
Sincereiy,
INLAND ASPHALT CO
~
/a/'rna McDonald
Environmentai Engineer
RECE11lED
sPoKANE couNTr
11 U L ? 3 199S
iDIvisION o~ SUiLoirva AvC► PLAPtNIivG
SY
a ~ - ~
~
C
An Equa! Opportunity Employer
\ ~ v ~r~J i ~ ~ 10 Mw
vra~~
. ~ 3 /O
4520
. ~t
(o1dA4420)
^ i~• 9t \
L: -
~~2503 - so" ~ I ' i
4
~519
U
Z1?24 I ~J ~ ♦
21 ~1P
~ ~9
20
9 8~ 3 b _ ~ s~ +t .o
i L
CHESTER
j ~ C E M ETERY e1 i C
tiho~ ~ i y Q e
, ; 4 a re' v~ b \ .
O
. C) ~o v zz ~
At • ti
h .
~ag°IS,IE~jj-.,, x y ' ~ 3G2+06°~RCZC ~
V I TEMP -~~+G ' pr~,, y ~ 1~ 9~ 3~ O
SEE TRAVLRSC Pl_AT; NO '¢7 CQ~ ~S ~ ~ >~"/Gv ~ I
nr,crQ i~ ri nni ~ Rr ~
7 2
~
S P O K A N F 4c
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAtii1NER C. DF`if"!, Fl'. CHfFf' FX :;M! N; '
Larry Guthn `
13419 East 1,
Spokane, WA 9921 c,,
RE: ZE-13-96/CIJE-1-96IVE4-96 Inland Asphalt Landfill
Dear Mr. Guthrie:
Please find enclosed a copy of a July 2, 19961etter to me from R.E. Wild, General Manager of
Inland Asphalt. This letter comments on my June 21, 1996 Letter Opinion in the above matter.
Regarding the condition of approval for the required asphalt overlay, I have decided to modify the
condition to require the overlay from Dishnian-Mica Road only to the entrance for the proposed I
landfill. If the entrance is at the north end of Sands Road, then the overlay need only be extended
to such entrance. If the entrance is placed further south toward 44th Avenue, then the overlay ,
would have to be extended to that location. This was my intent all along, I simpty lost sight of it
when composing my letter.
The "no public durnping" issue, is a little more complicated. Since I did not recall any objection
by Inland Asphalt when you brought this issue up at the public hearing, I went ahead and imposed
this condition. I do feel there is a public interest in seeing the pit site at the Chester Landfill filled
and reclaimed as soon as possible. However, it was never my intent to bar Inland from allowing
its regular customers from dumping inert wastes at the site and Inland charging them for the same.
It appears a reasonable compromise would be to allow Inland to accept inert wastes from its
regular customers and charge them for the same, but to otherwise bar the general public from
dumping at the site during the initial term of the conditional use permit. I don't know how
difficult this would be to police.
I will allow you and Inland Asphalt until 4:00 p.m. on July 15, 1996 to comment in writing on the
public dumping issue. I will then render a decision, which will be incorporated into the final
written findings, conclusions and decision in this matter.
Sincerely, ,
/
Michael C. Dempsey
Enclosure
cc R. E. Wild, P.E., Inland Asphalt Company, P.U. Box 3366, Spokane, WA 99220-3366
Steve Davenport, Division of Building and Planning
Scott Engelhard, Division of Engineering
THIkD FLook PuBuC WorzKs BuiLotNc
lOZb WEST BROADWAYAVENUE, $f'OKANF,, WASH(NGTON 99260-0245
PtiovE: (509) 324-3490 • FnC (509) 324-3978 • TDD: (509) 324-3166
~
, °HONE (509) -cw34-2657 a CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION 4lN-LA-NA-'3040
FAX (509) 534-9787 j
~ oc(e,i,~oJ Inland Asphalt Company SINCE 1934 ~ .
~
5111 E BROADWAY • P O BOX 3366 • SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99220 3366
~IMlil~%
July 2, 1996
Michael C Dempsey g '~6
_Y
SPOKANE COUNTY
Officer of the Heanng Examiner
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0245
Dear Mr Dempsey,
Inland Asphalt received the Letter of Opinion wntten for project ZE-13-96/CUE-1-
96/VE-4-96 Althotigh we are pleased to see that it is the opLnlon of the Hearing
Examiner to approve this project, there seems to be some confusion on several issues
Fi-rst, it has always been Inland's tmderstanding that the asphalt overlay would extend
from Dishman-Mica to the entrance of the project The entrance is not at Sands and
44t1l , but north of that on Sands Road Inland Asphalt is willing to overlay the road
from Dishman-Mica to their entrance, not to the entrance of the exlsting Chester
Landfill at 44th and Sands
Secondly, Inland Asphalt would like a clarification on the prohibition of publlc
dumpilio, It was presented in the public hearing that Inland's intentions were to use the
site for themselves and theu customers However, not a]l of Inland's customers are
pennltted free dumping, and will be charged a competittve fee Inland's custonlers do
not necessarily indulbe in the services provided by the existing Chester Landfill, but
have been long terni customers of Inland and are willing to pay Inland for their
ClUlllplilb services in the Valley Does this constitute "publlc dumping", now that our
customers have an option in the valley)"
Inland Asphalt does not believe it is the County's intent to aid in the cash flow of one
landfill by disallowing pubhc use by another Tlus creates a monopoly for one site and
places unjust restnctions on the use of the other Inland Asphalt beheves this is not in
the best interest of the citizens of Spokane County, they should be allowed a choice, no
matter when and if Inland chooses to go pubhc Inland Asphalt asks that the ` no
puUhc" dumpinb be re-examined and at the very least acknowledge that Inland Asphalt
will be allowed to charge some of theLr customers and the pubhc for dumping
An Equal Opportunrty Employer
- ~
Michael Dempsey
July 2, 1996
Page 2
Inland Asphalt appreciates you tal:.tng these matters into consideration We feel that
some sinlple clanfications will put these concerns to bed However, if these concerns
are not addressed, Inland AsPhalt is prepared to appeal the final Findings of Fact
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (509)534-6221
Sincerely,
INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY
R E Wild, P E
General Manager
c Mike Murphy
Jana McDonald
Dwight Hume
(
l
3, Z~ .
~ JUN 2 0 1996 ~
F
~
- ~~unty En~aeenn~
S P O K A N E wE~ o~ C O U N T Y ~
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER MICHAEL C DEMPSEY, CHIEF EXAMINER .
June 21, 1996
Inland Asphalt Company
c/o Jana McDonald
P O Box 3366
Spokane, WA 99220
Letter Opinion ZE-13-96/CUE-1-96/VE-4-96, Inland Asphalt Landfill
Dear Applicant
After reviewing the entire record in this matter, I have decided to approve the above
application for a rezone, conditional use permit and variance The approval will be subject
to the conditions recommended by the vanous public agencies, including the condition
requested by County Engineenng for a 1 5inch asphalt overlay on Sands Road I will also
add a few new conditions, which I reference below
I find that the various applications as condittoned meet legal requirements, generally for the
reasons crted in the County Division of Building and Planning staff report I disagree with a
portion of Steve Davenport's wntten interpretation, dated March 6, 1996, of the mearung
of "sanitary landfill" under Section 14 706 140 of the Spokane County Zoning Code It is
my legal opinion that to the extent a new landfill in the unincorporated area of the county
would accept "demolition wastes" that are not also "inert wastes", the landfill constitutes a
"sanitary landfill" under Zoning Code Section 14 706 140 that cannot be placed withsn the
Aquifer Sensitive Area See Section 10 6, Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (1992) and Section 1 06 130
(2)(11), Spokane County Health District Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management
and Handling (1988) I do concur with the Determination of Nonsignficance issued by
County staff
The applicant has indicated, pursuant to its "Operations\lViai ntenance Plan", that it intends
to landfill only "inert wastes", to include concrete, asphalt, clean fill dirt, glass and bncks
The classification of landfilling matenal as "inert waste" is determined by the County Health
District pursuant to definitions in chapter 173-304 WAC (1V1FS) and applicable Health
Distnct regulattons Steve Holderby of the Health Distnct has confirmed that the matenals
the applicant wishes to landfill, including asphalt, constitute "inert wastes" (as long as they
are not contaminated) This was also testified to by the applicant at the public heanng
TH[RD FLOOR PUEiLIC WORKS BUILDINC
1026 WEST B[tOADtivnYAvENUE, SPOKAh2, WASHwcTOtv 99260-0245
PHONE (509) 324-3490 • Fnx (509) 324-3478 • TDD (509) 324-3166
Inland Asphalt Company June 21, 1996 ,
Page 2
ry, rZY Y f 1
Based on such evidence, I find that the application meets the locational criteria of the
Zoning Code, County Health District Regulations and the Solid Waste Management Plan
regarding landfilling over a sole source aquifer Accordingly, approval will be for an "inert
waste" landfill only, which landfill may accept only the types of waste currently listed by the
applicant in its "Operations/ Management Plan" under the current permits
A remaining question is whether the proposal requires a solid waste disposal permit from
the Spokane County Board of County Commisstoners andlor is subject to the "flow
control" provisions of chapter 8 56 of the Spokane County Code (SCC) See SCC
8 56 020 (ee) "Demolition waste", to include "inert waste", clearly constitutes "solid
waste" as defined in tlus chapter Any new landfill that accepts solid waste in the
unincorporated portion of the county constitutes a"sanitary landfill" for the purposes of
SCC chapter 8 56 See SCC 8 56 020 (dd) Pursuant to SCC 8 56 070 (3), the following
solid waste disposal operations or facilities are exempt from obtaining a permtt from the
Board of County Commissioners and are also eaempt from the "flow control" provisions of
SCC Chapter 8 56
Depositing soil, rock, tree stumps, gravel, broken concrete, broken
asphalt, and similar inert wastes onto the surface of the ground
whereby such depositing is to be temporary in nature, graded, and
otherwise worked to fill an existing depresslon or low area of
ground
Whether this exemption applies to the proposal or not presents a legal issue that may
involve some interpretation and legislative history Unfortunately, this issue was not
addressed dunng the publ,c hearing process by the County Division of Building and
Planrung staff, County Utilities staff or the applicant The written decision entered by the
Spokane County Zoning Ad,Justor in Building and Planning File Nos CUE-5-87/VE-5-87,
approving a variance and conditional use permit for the adjacent Chester Landfill, references
a letter submitted by County Utilities in January, 1987 stating that the Chester Landfill was
exempt from the flow control ordinance, pursuant to the flow control ordinance section that
corresponds to SCC 8 56 070 However, the decision also notes that the Spokane County
Prosecuting Attorney's Office submitted a memorandum regarding the Chester Landfill in
February, 1987, requesting that approval of the landfill be conditioned on compliance vvith
the flow control ordinance After the public record was closed in the present matter, the
applicant herein provided the Heanng Examiner with a copy of a memorandum from
County Utilities dated August 16, 1989, in Building and Planrung File Nos VS-52-89 and
CUS-30-89, regarding the renewal of the Chester Landfill conditional use permit This
memorandum indicates that inert and demolition landfill sites are exempt from the flow
control ordinance
~
Inland Asphalt Company
June 21, 1996
Page 3
,
Given the lack of comment on this issue at the public heanng, and the possible involvement
of the Board of County Commissioners as a permitting agency regarding the proposal, I
prefer to defer rendenng a legal opinion on the applicability of this exemption or chapter
8 56 of the County Code to the proposal However, I will add as a condition of approval
that the applicant comply with the provisions of chapter 8 56 of the Spokane County Code,
without making a finding whether the proposal is exempt or not The applicant is
encouraged to contact County Utilities as well as the County Prosecuting Attorney, Crvil
Division, regarding the need to comply with tlus chapter of the County Code
I have decided to adopt the condition of approval recommended by County Engineenng
that the applicant be required to apply a 1 5 inch asphalt overlay for Sands Road pnor to
operation of the landfill, from Dishman-Mica Road to 44th Avenue I base this pnmarily on
the expert testimony of Chad Coles, Pavement Management Engineer for Spokane County
Mr Coles testified that based on application of national design standards (AASHTO) used
by the County for roadway pavement, to the tnps per day projected by the applicant and
typical weights of the heavy trucks that would be used to transport matenal to the landfill,
the proposal would prematurely breakdown the existing pavement He also testified that
expenence had shown that the pavement would be broken down gradually by haul projects
utilizing heavy trucks and that such damage would usually be unseen until after a project
was complete and the pavement destroyed The applicant concedes that larger trucks
impact road performance more than smaller trucks, but offers that many other factors may
affect pavement life, such as traffic volumes, weather, maintenance, pavement quality, etc
The applicant adopts a"wait and see" approach, and recommends that it be allowed to
negotiate a"haul road agreement" or performance bond to handle the situation On
balance, I find there is a probability that the proposal will prematurely breakdown the
pavement on Sands Road, and that the 1 5 inch overlay should be applied to the road before
the project starts I note that Sands Road is not simply a"haul road", but also serves the
residents of the area Further, conditions of approval imposed by local governments on
development need only be "roughly proportionate" to the impact of the development to
meet legal requirements
I will also adopt as a condition of approval the recommendatton from the County Division
of Building and Planrung that reclamation of the site shall include a minimum of one foot of
topsoil, which is based on County Health Distnct regulations
As requested by the operator of the Chester Landfill, I will add a condition that prohibits
public dumping at the site dunng the initial terms of the permit, to give the Chester Landfill
the opporturuty to be filled up and fully reclaimed However, I will allow the applicant the
opporturuty to apply for reconsideration of tius condition dunng the initial term of the
pernuts, depending on the progress of landfill operations at the Chester site
1
r .
Inland Asphalt Company ' June 21, 1996
Page 4
Lastly, I will impose a few conditions relating to the daily operation of the landfill, guided
by the past history at the adjacent Chester Landfill and the conditions of approval imposed
on the landfill operation at such site I will require that the landfill be closed on Memonal
Day, July 4, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day, in
addition to weekends No landfill operations, including receiving waste, dumping, cleaning
or grading, will be allowed between the hours of 5 00 p m and 8 00 a m at the landfill I
will reserve the right, during the initial term of the permit, and following appropriate notice
and heanng, to impose additional dust control measures at the site if the same become
necessary, such as paving the area between the public roadway and the active dumping area
on the site I will also give authonty to County Building and Planning staff to require the
muffling of heavy equipment at the site, as practicable, if noise complaints are received from
the residents of the area
This letter opinion is subJect to the entry of formal written findings, conclusions and
decision consistent with this opinion, which final document I should have completed in the
near future The time for appeal, if any, would run from the date I approve the fornlal
findings, conclusions and decislon
Thank you for your patience in awaiting this decision
Very truly yours,
~ JP C
~
1VLchael C Dempsey
Spokane County Heanng Examiner
cc Dwight Hume
Steve Davenport, Division of Building and Planrung
Rob Binger, Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division
Parties of Record
~
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
.
DIVISION OF ENGITFEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
William A Johns, P E, County Engineer Dennis M Scott, P E, Director
May 6, 1996
Mr Mike Dempsey
Spokane County Hearing Examiner
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Re ZE 13-96 Chester Landfiil
Having read Mr Wild's letter of May 2, 1996 I have the following
comments
1 I agree that all the factors mentioned affect the life of a
pavement structure I also agree that Inland Asphalt
Company has no control over any of these factors other
than the additionai loads that they apply to the road in
connection with this proposed zone change That is why
the analysis performed considered damage to the
pavement only from traffic traveling to their landfill based on
the information they provided
2 The assumption of the "design vehicie" used in the analysis
was based again on the information provided by Inland
Asphalt Company The weight of this vehicle was assumed
at the legal limit which is the most cost beneficial load and
therefore the most likely
3 Finally, according to our structural response data for this
section of Sands Road the average remaining life is 14
years under the current traffic loading This indicates that
the road will require structurai repair (overlay) in
approximately 7 years if traffic loadings do not change
I hope that these comments answer any questions you have regarding the
Engineer's conditions for this zone change request
Sincer ,
had W Coles, P E
Pavement Management Engineer - •
, 1026 W Broadway Ave • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 324-3478 TDD (509) 324-3166
\
PHONE (509) 534-2657 , CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION #IN•LA-NA-'304K5
FAX (509) 534-9787 Inland Asphalt Company SINCE 1934 .
~
~
.
5111 E BROADWAY • P O BOX 3366 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220 3366
°j rl~tApnl 25, 1996
p e 5
Scott Engelhard
SPOK:ANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
RE Zone Change Condltions #DRE-172-96
Dear Mr Engelhard,
I havz enclosed the past 5 years of annual quantities of matenal going mto the existi.ng
Chester Landfill for your review They are as follows.
Inert Demo Total (cubic vards)
1991 28,000 30,000 58,000 f
1992 18,532 25,648 44,000
1993 6, 259 50)083 563342
1994 5, 885 341771 40)656
1995 4,042 26,634 30,676
Please note that Inland Asphalt proposes to take 383,000 cubic yards over a 20 year
penod, while the existing Chester Landfill has taken 60 % of that in 5 years. Over the
20 years that Inland proposes that is approxi-nately 19,150 cubic yards a year
However, after reviewmg the sigm.ficant drop of inert matenals in the Chester Landfill
the last several years, Inland does not anticipate much more than 10,000 yards of
matenal a year
I thought you would like the opportunity to review these figures If you have any
questions or need additional uiformation, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Smcerely,
INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY
4
~
j''i7-- W
7ag McDonald
Environmenta.l Englneer
cc Ra.ndy Wild ~ , - . , . _
Michael Murphy
Randy Waters
AM 2 5 1996
,
SnOKAtqE COI;NTY EyGINEER .
V_ . . . An Equal Opportunity Employer
t
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Spokane County, Washington
VARIANCE NO OWNER/APPLICANT NAME(S)
BLDG PERNtIT NO
OTHER NO Z:E - J3 -Cl C Ue7- 1vlAILTNG ADDRESS
SEC T z57 N R E, W iv[
PARCEL NO PHONE HOME
~
ROAD NAME ~l `T`'' C ~ AVa PHONE WORK
ROAD FILE NO
~
~
nrP nPPr~Pri ~F1F~=C~1-~~t='QTO~ES'S~~~L1~.~QF-
r
b
\
~ lURECORDED COPY OF DEED, DEED OF TRUST, contract or conveytnc, instrument These may be obtained from
the County Auditor, 2"d floor of the courthouse
s~ easentei:K
IV
A LISTNG OF NANtES of individuals who will be signing the documents These ►ndividual names should appear as
the person(s) legally sign theu name -
(Fc:.a CURRENT ASSESSOR'S,\,iAP with the affected property/location highlighted, along with a detailed legal descnptton
&GE'D- O\ViNERSHIP \i[CRO-RW ?1hese may be obtained from the Counry Assessor's office, located cr the lit floor of the
courthouse
The necessary documents will be prepared by the Right of Way Section of the Engineec's Deparnnent upon provision of the
i.nformation noted above You will be notified when the documents are ready for signature The documents may be sent to you,
however, IT SHOULD BE NOTED TH.AT aLL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTA.RIZED The Enguneer's Department does have notanes
available if you choose to sian chz documents at our office
~
7k' Please call hen readv Please mail when ready
~ Right of Way
COMIMENTS f5 FO+L -f-k-46 P✓~fol4-20-'t-1an1 O/---, A- ?-t&/-/T esF
V/AY P0k 77H~ OJ= e~+7-14 /y 1(~57N'L)O'. Sca ll
9-L4-!"
Ri--.'ht of Way AL f orwarded to you from
nvforrTUlciocuntLnt 1v0n.
e
e
c y
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 - $;EZONFi -
TO Spokane County Planning Department, Steve Davenport
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott EngelhardSE
DATE• April 17, 1996
SUBJECT• ZE-13-96 / INLAND ASPHALT
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner for inclusion in the
"Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" of the public hearing scheduled
May l, 1996
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
C„unty Engineer
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans
E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards
and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway secta.ons and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal
E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the
proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone A development permit shall
be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within
any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 88-0521)
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sands Road as a 80 foot Minor Arterial The
existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The
Plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended a strip of
property 10 feet in width along the Sands Road frontage be set aside in reserve This
property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are
made to Sands Road
E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, includa.ng property to be dedicated or set
aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for
adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work
SPECIAL CONDITION The County Engineer has prescribed a 1 5 inch asphalt overlay for Sands
Road prior to operation of the landfill The overlay shall extend from Dishman Mica
Road to 44th Avenue
SPECIAL CONDITION Trucks hauling to the site shall not use 44th Avenue or Sands Road to back
up and access the site
MAR-2E-1996 15:16 INLAND ASPF-PLT 509 534 97E7 P,01
PHONE (Sa9) 6.1i-Z5S?' CONi1tACTdl1 RnQdfTRKT10N 011144A411A-'30IK:
FI►x (509) 53447tT
Inland Asjohatt Company, S,NCE 1991 .
~
s>» E. sAawwAr - P.O. BOX 3366 • SPOWWE, WASHINGl'ON 9W20-336d
March 28, 1996
Office of Spokane
County Engineer
Divlsion of Engineering and Rcd :
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Attn: Scott Englehard
Zef* Zone Change Conditions1#171RE-171-96
r~e. i
as promised at our meeting this moming, I am providing the following
information,
1. Chad Co1es` analysis indicates "Acme Nfaterials" will be hauling waste
material. We don't think Acme is involved. Ha!
2. The capacity of our Chester Pd calculates to be 383,000 cubic yards.
3. Based on a truck and pup capacity of 20 c.y./truck, the landfill could only hold
19,150 loads, which equates to 44,428 ESALs total.
4. We praject thai it will take 20 years to fi!l the landfill, so the annual ESALs
would be 2,221.
5. Actual projected landfill usage with 2,221 ESALs/year is significantty less
than the 30,160 ESALs/year that Chad used in hES calculations.
Since the projected ESALs from our potential landfill operation relates to onfy
(2,221l11,070) 20% of the existing ESALs, it will be interesting to see what depth
of overlay, if any, might be required with this new information.
Sincerely,
INLAND COMPANY
R E 1IVId, P E
~
General Manager '
' - ~
REWIsu .~-1-1 ~ AI
-~4,
t?~-C
c: Michael Murphy
Randy WaterslJana McDonald
~.....i.....,,.
,
D E T E R M IN, ATI'ON OF
NONSIGN`iF 1j(~CANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3)
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S) ZE-13-96/CUE-1-96/VE-4-96
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Zone Reclassificatlon from Urban Residential-3 5
(UR-3 5) to Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), and a Conditional Use Pernut for an inert and
demolition landfill and a Vanance from the 10 acre m.inimum lot size requirement specified by
Section 14 606 240 11(a) of the Spokane Counry Zoning Code
APPLICANT: Inland Asphalt Company RECEIVED
Jana McDonald ~ 1996
5111 East Broadway 4PR o
Spokane, WA 99212
(509) 534-6221 tgA EWAO8ilIg
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located north of 44th Avenue, east of and
adjacent to Sands Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane Counry, Waslvngton
LEAD AGENCY SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETERMINATION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable sigruficant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not requued under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) Tlus decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency Tlus
information is available to the publlc on request
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency wdl not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this DNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., April 29, 1996, if they are intended to alter
the DNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
By Steve Davenport Title Planner II
Phone (509) 456-2205
Address. Spokane Counry Division of Build.ing and Planrung (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway ;
Spokane, WA 99260 i ,
DATE ISSUED 1996 SIGNATURE ~ r
U
COlVA4IIV'IS REGARDING FNVIRONMQ*4'TAL CONCFRNS ARE V'VFL~C.~OME AT TFIE H[EARING
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 2nd Floor,
West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is the same as the above
project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to
approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and the appellant should be
prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Division of Building and Planrung to
assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) (SpoKane)
2 WA State Department of Health
3 Spokane County Health Distnct
4 Spokane County Division of Engineenng
5 Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authoriry
6 Spokane Counry Parks Department
7 Spokane County Boundary Review Board
8 Spokane Reglonal Transportation Council
9 WA State Depart,ment of Transportation
10 Spokane Transit Authonty
11 Central Valley School District
12 Spokane County Water Dlstrict No 3
13 Fire District No. 1
14 WA State Department of Natural Resources (Colville)
15 WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife (Spokane)
16. Solid Waste Disposal Project Office
17 Union Pacific Railroad
\ ~,k Access f`\ 11, -3
P
cNE::-~ER
I ' , ~ I , ~ ' ~I • ~ %fil ti
I t
II'~JL
.r o
-i~,
0O
4' nz'''C
S V
Q TC
• ~ „ sJa~c~~ ~}rr~t , I,~,r,tl,nns . - ~'J-Y~
, 3---
~ l'0 ro -n lluiop
' ~
o
J
Q/ R2
~ Ir'
n . '
; IK x e~ o , V'CIn'I''Y mAP
I c 7 ~
i ~ ~I \ 7 G
O
~
rv ~
~ o
\I ~ .~c '[C%~✓iQ ~ ' ~
n
f .
t y 05;,~ 5/I UGVn~~ C~/~IA2CJNq , p` i
~ ~ty w ll/~L'~ ~I19 nq ~~YYL J I n
% ~
c c~ ~
a
. ~
,
, , .
0
Chtskr
, S1TE PtAN
OF RECORD
~ I I
TAB[.E A
- ~ ~ ,
?xasting Loning U R-3 S ~ ~ " , • :
'roposed Zonin6 IZR-IU INLAND ASPHA►LT
fotal /~,ren Approx 5 Stcreti LANDFILL ' Sl l L` iYltil
3uildLng Coverage Approx GO aq ft
3utldtng SelbHC.6 JO IrLt (i nm prupLrty NOT TO SCALE PAGE l OF 4
fypco(l.und-,Llipinb I"xnUng 1)0-1 inuici ~Li<<iunb SCC 33,TWN 25,R.44EWM SPOKANE,COUNTY L~
~ .
w I► ..ft
PROP(Atr DESCRfv1ioN
'MI MW at Me X t/a a1 14 A 1/a &I U1 'L 1/4 I fNIM 33
1, f! M, Il 4 4RY. yq 1w4MeMvft of M rMl of wft 1 b
M0.0646r w. b~►.M 1 ~N W. ryl r.ry
b M Ohw M W M MMIM fwry
M iWM" r w[w-v t Mo.r. WN of wMpw
l
Note: Sa attached Opcradons/Maintenance Plan
and Roclamation Plan
~
~ .
~ ~ ►
,
9 n .
^ f.4w Mrw . 0'
.
. „
~
I,
~ ws~v r ~p 1
_ G8'Fi AL'[ NI. raM Rwvµnou~,_ ` \
S1TE pLAN
OF RECORD
~
INLAND ASPHALT ~
LANDFILL - EXISTING CONTOURS I
NOT TO SCALE PAGE 2 OF 4
SEC. 33, TWN. 25, R 44EwM SPOKnNF., COUNTY ,
7 t.i I _4.
~
PROPtpTr DESCRIa1i0N
t..~ ..u. r ir r,N or Ia nI!d .f w[ Nd r w.w. 33
it k. 0 N I OY. M't 1wI1wNry r Mr A/A 80 .ft ~p1 b
.d M.P. b►.w c..... w~w + w
w P.w 9MW N~WMV t~MF
\
Y(141w1 ~ IM CMI~ ~l ~M, YAY Yws*MMM
Notc: See attached OpctationyMaintena.ncc Plan
i;- and Roclamation Plan
I I` I,
,
o.
wroUui m ncn
~ n .
~ ' ~ •
I \ r.V
N ,
~
z
v~- PHASE I- EST, YEAR 2001 COMPLETION
Flll TO APPROXIAIAIE ELEVATION OF 1990-2000)
I
N
\ +
~ ~
~ ~ '
~
G.
■ N 0- 3d ' • \t
~ - - 44T" AA"~k-- _ moo'qvA°r^"a°` SITE PC,~N
OF RECCRD
INLAND ASPHALT
LANDFILL - RECLAMATI4N 1996 - 2002
NOT TO SCALE PAGE 3 OF 4
SEC. 33, TWN. 25, R. 44EWM SPOKANF, CQl1NT1'
'7G-I2.Q,e
PROPCRIY p(SCR1VhON
, +►06 m.pr of r# fI 1N of w " 114 r I►. tc 1/4 r{Wi. 71
` 1. 1s M. a. 4 Ia Y. " 1rIW1~Mi .4 4r Or1 I~'M Iwfy~ I
\ ~N wv.-k*~ M YM Mwl fi7" rO ri ,w1 M w~ r~.iN
N IM 01M0 oMW W 1MsoIM tA-!!y
Y MyM& Y IN Orr4v r w.e rw ✓ w.w"M
M=,7~
111ytk f 1
~
Note: See attached Operations/Maintenana Plan
and Reclamation Plan
PHASE IV
~ (APPROX, 2405-2007) %
~
~ ~ .
a ,
g _ •
o -
Mwc wr go nr~
~ ~ ~
2
<
1n aw w... r
PHASE III
(APPROX, 2 - OS)
I
~ PHASf II
(APPROIf. 1 01 - 20
r w'S~ r~ y►!1
MTH 1 1l, f`,AI 1
I~6--- - AV~NU~_ ~7 _ .owawaAu', ao:o
OFRECCnD
INLAND ASPHALT
LANDFTLL - RECLAMATION 2002 - 2007
NOT TO SCALE PAGE 4 OF 4
SEC. 33, TWN. 25, R 44EWM SPOKANE, COUNTY
~
. ~
~
If X ~
RECEIVED
SPOICANE COUNTY
MAR 0 1 1996
OtVtIION OF Dul6OM /IklO PLANNIIJG
BY;
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 ; l;
~ ZE-13,-%
O ~
SPOK1lKE ENVIROIQMEH7AL ORDiNANCE
,
' (YAC 191-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1) ~ •
. ~
Envirorxr;ental CheCklist
Puryose of Checklist Fi1e No
The State Enviroioental Poltcy Act (SEPA) chapter 43 21C RC11. redulres all goverrmntal agencies to conslder the environmental impacts of a proposal
before aeking Aecisions An Environaental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposais with probable significant adverse Smpacts on
the quality of the environeent The purpose of this checklist is to provfde infornsation to help you and the agency idencffy lmpacts fron your
proposal (and to reCuce or avo1C impatts from the proposal, if it can be dane) and to help the agency Aecide wnether an EIS is repuireE
Instructions for Applicants
This environaentsl checlclist asks you to Gescribe soae bastc information aDa t your proposal Governmentai agencies use thls checklist to deter,nine
whether the environaental iapacts of your proposal ere signiflcant, requiring preparation of an E1S Ansver the questions briefly, with the most
precise inforaation known, or give the best Cestrlptton you can
You must answer each Question accurately and carefully. to the Eest of your knowledge In most cases. you shoul4 be aDle to answer the questSons
fron your own observations or pro3ect plans without the need to hire ezperts If you really do not know the ansrer, or if a Question Eoes not apply
to your proposal, write 'do not know• or 'does not apply ' Cmplete ansMers to the questtons now may avoid unnecessary Eelays later
Sone questtons •sk about governwental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline. •nd landmark destgnattons Answer these questtons if you can If you
have problews. the qovermiental agencies can asstst you
TAe checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, eren tf you plan to do theso over a perlod of time or on dSfferent parcels of tand
Attach any additlonal infonmetton that v111 descrlbe your proposal or tts environnental effects The agency to whtch you submlt this checklist may
ask rou to explain your answers or provide addtttonal tnfonoatton reasonably relateE to deternlning tf there Aay be stgnificant adverse impact
Use of checklist for nonoroject OroPosals
GaAplete this checklist for nonproSett proposals. even theugh questions nay be ansrered 'dx s not aoCly'
IN ADDITION. couplete the SUP?IEMEHTIIL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0)
For nonpro,K ct acttons. the refen nces in the checkltst to the words 'projeet.' 'applicant,' and 'praperty or sSte' should be read as 'proposal,'
'proposer,• and •affecteC geographtc area.' respectively
A 811LKGROU!(D
I yame of proposeA project, ir aDDllcaDle Inland Asphalt Inert Landfill
2 Name of Applicant Inland Asphalt Co.
3 Address ana pnone nu+ioer ot appltcant or contact person P.O. BOx 3366, Spokane, WA 99220
(5119) 534-2657
4 Date checklist prepared January 29, 1996
s Ayency requesting Checklist Spokane County Planning Department 6 Proposed tlninq ar sthedule (lntluding phnsing, if eppllteble) Upo n Ap p r ova 1
7 a Do rou have any plans for future additions, expanslon. or further attivity related to ar com etted w1tA thts proposa17 if yes expla5n
~Q _ 1 _ha wi 1 1 he c~Q~ ls landf ~llina of inert material. ~
V
. A
Y /
E Do you own or have optlons on land neer0y or aEjacent to this praposal? If yes. explain
VL, ,
*Pl~
8 L1st any environaental infonmatton you know about that has been prtpared, or will be prepared, dtrettly releted to this proposal ~
A Solid Waste Permit will be needed from the Health District, a Rezone,
Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Access Permit.
aev t/1iae ~
t
sroWre cxv-cROrirErrM oxniNence f
' (VAC 197-11-960) Sectioa 11~10 230(1)
A, HAC1CG80QAD (cootlnued) ~
~
9 Do you fmov vhether appliu tions •re peading for governaentel approvsl• of other proposale dlrectly affecting the proper:y covered by vour
proposal' IE qee es➢ Lla '
No
~
10 Liec any goveromeat approvals or pernlte that vlll be netded for your pcoposal, i( latovrt A SO11d Waste Permit W111 have
to be obtained from the Spokane County Health District.
il Cive a brief, complete descripclon of your proposal, lncluding the proposed uies and the sise ot the project end oice 'here •re several
queecions later Ln this checkllac chat aslc rou to desulbe certain u pecte of your proposal Y w do not need Co repeat thoae anavers on chis
page
A zone change is being sought to allow for an inert landfill adjacent to an
existing inert and demolition landfill. Aall office would be added to tne site.
.
, •
.
1= Locacion of the yropoeal Glve suf[icienc inEormacion for a petson to underscand the pcecise Location of your prooosed proSect lncludlnp a
etceet addreee if any, and eettion tovnship and range, if Icnovn Ii • proposal vould occur over a range of e-ee provtde the ranp,e or
bouadariee of the e1Ce(s) Provide a legal descriptlon, •!te pian, viclnity aap and topogtaphic mep, lf reaeonebly evailable uhtle vou
ahauld subeit any plans requlred bq the agency, yw •re not required Co dupllu te nap• or de uiled plans wbmSC[ed vtth aay permic appltcatlon
ceLated to chis checkLlsi
That portion of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 33, T. 25 N.,
R. 44 E.W.M., lying southwesterly of the right of way conveyed to the Washington
and Trlahn Ra i 1 rnat`nmpany.Ta_nd the riQht of wav conveyed to the Oreqon Railroad
and Navictation Company. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
Access is off of Sands Road, just north of 44th avenue.
13 Dces the propoeed action lle vithin the Aquifer Senaicive krea (ASA)' -he General Sever Service Aree' -he Prlortty Sever Service Aree' 'he
Clty of Spokane' (See Spokane County o ASA Overlay Zone lktla• for boundaries)
The proposed action does lie within the awuiter sensitive area ana Lne
r
~
"0 BE COM7i.E"ED B4 APPL?CAN'f
8 ElPCIROV`ER'".AL E1.ZPL°Y[S
Evalustton f'or
Agency Uae Only
1 EAP-77 ~ ./~'','-r
a Genernl deecflp[1on o[ the elce (circle one) fle rolling, hilly, ~ceep slopea mounteinoue, ~
7
othe[ ~ ~
c,PP T()Pn nf YP("(lxii_
iie
a•
,~Od b JTac is the e[eepeac alope on the sice (appro:lmate pereent slope)'
mbp -,Jpp,c- 1-=,J,/2-1 vPrtical to horizontal.
c 'fiac gencrel typee of aoils ere found on the •ice (Eor eumple clay, uad. gravel, peat, ouck)'
If vou knov the elaeeificaclon of agric ulw ral sotls, •pecify chea and oote any prioe facm land
The soils found on sa.te include sand and gravel materials.
d 4re there surface indicstione or hletorq of unscable solla in the immediete viciaity, If so, • on
describe ~ 0
Yes. Drainage enters site and erodes drainage channel.~ ~
.
z
~
-6b~~/ ~ s ~
. ~
' SPOKANE ENYIROHNEHTAL OROINAHCE
(WAC 197-11-960) SecN on 11 10 230(1)
B ENVIROMiENTAL ELEMENTS(cont9nued) ,I
Evaluation For
e Oescribe the DurPose, type, and aPDroxirnate quantities of any t'illtng or grading proposed Agency Use Only
indicate source of fill
The entire site will be filled as a resuit ot this
oroposal_ The fill material would be inert materials, such as concrete. See
f Couid erosion oaur as a result of clearing, construction, or use, if so, generally describe R2C1aIildtlOT1 Plan. 422l
No. Erosion would not occur as a result. The pr03ect will
arfi»allV hPlLL-prPVent and stop onqolnq eroSion. L ,,~~Q u/o,~Q
~ `
~u~
o
g About what percent of the site w111 De covered wtth tmpervtous surfaces after pro,~ect cortstruc-
tion (for exanqle, asphalt or buildinqs)' C,~, ^
~ - e••~i
There will be one small office on site (60 Sq. ft.),
96pgx.nYimately i_pcc than onP pprrpnt of the site will be
cogered wa.th buildinas. a -
;
V f
h Proposed measurcs to reduce or control erosion, or other imqacts to the earth, tf any - ~ !/N,
~Qn E'- /
. N-
e'41111
2 AIR
a 11hat type of ecoissions to the air woulE result fron the proposal (i e, dust, autornoblle. odorz ~o
industrial, wooE smoke) during tonstruttion and when the pro3ect is Conpleted? If any,
generally descrfbe and give approximete quantites tf knorn
There mav be some dust produced from the unloading ,>-1- ~
of trucks. SCAPCA regulations will be applicable. ~
b Are there any off-site sources of etotszions or odor that ma affect our ro osal' If
Y Y P D so,
9enerally describe
No. The ad)acent property is used for a landfill and
t-n thA nnrth 1'hPYP ar ai oad tracks. There is diesel
emissions from these adjacent properties.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control emtssions or other lmpatts to air. if any
The entrance road into the landfill will be paved
and water will be used to control dust from truc;cs
tllot izire unloadinq.
3 uaTER ~
a Surface
(1) Is there any surface water body on or 1n the irsnedtete vlcinity of the site tncludtng year-
rounC and seasoaal streams, saltxater. lakes. ponds, wetlands)7 If yes. describe type and
provide names lt appropriate, state what stream or rlver it flors tnto A
YpG P1 ni,~C-re. k is in the vicinitv and northerly of
the railroad tracks adDacent to our north boundary.
The FEMA map indicates flood level map at elevation I ~
,
?Onq wh,ch ,c nf_f site accardinQ to a 1993 survey.
(2) Mili the project requlre any work over, 1n, or adjacent to (wlthln 200 feet) the described ~
waters? If yes. please descrtbe and attach avallable plans ~
-
No 116ynlL
3
r 4 i
SPOL►tE LRVIRO2QCENiAL ORDINANCE
('aAC 197-I1-960) Sectioo 11 20 230(1)
D EHVIAOlilEt7rAI. ELLIQir'S (contlnued)
Eveluation For '
Agency Uee Ortly
(J) Eetimate the anount of fill •nd dredge titerial thec vould De placed !n or reooved fron the
eurface vater or vetlaads and indicnte the •rea of the site that vould be affected Indicace
the eource of fill oecerial
Tln
~
~
(G) Vill the proposal reQuire •urface water vichd nw 1s or diverslons' Cive a general descrip-
tion, purpose, and •pprosinace Quaetities, if knovn
(~T n
(S) Dxs the pcoposal lie vithin a 100ryear flood plalef If •o, note loutioo on the •ite pLn
No - The FEMA map shows flood elevation at 2009, but a ~
Lcjoi cur..vey czhaWc_- thai- P1Py?t7i-nn 2009 j.s of£site. See exhibit A. ~
(5) Does the proposal involve any discharIIes of vu ce uterlal• co surface vaters' If so
deacribe the type of vaste and antitipated volum ot dlscharge
No
D Cround
(1) uill groundvacer De vlchdravn, or vill vacet be dlscAarsed to Sroundvater' Clve general
descripclon, purpose. and •pyro:inate Quanti[les, it 1movn
No water will be withdrawn or discnargea.
(2) Deecribs wste naterlal chat vill be d1scAarged lato the grouod from •ep[it Canks ar other
sanitary vaste trsadeet facility Qescrlbe the Qeneral •ise of the •ystes, the number of
houses co be served (lt appllcaDle) or the number of persons the sqsceo(s) are expected to
eerve
rChAre w, il hP onP o__~rson oU the site and a portable
toTlet will probably be used for bathroom services.
(S) DeseriDe any •yscems, ocher [tua chose designad for the dlepoaal of unlcary waate
inatalled Eor the purpose of dlschargiag fluid• belov the ground •uriace (includes systm• •uel,
as choee for the dlsposal of scorn vacer or drainage Eroa floor drains) Describe the cype of
syatem the aoount of asterial to be disposed o[ through the systea and the type• of macerlal•
likely co be disposed of (including asterial• vhich say eoter the nstem inadvertently through
epill• or a• a result of firefightina aetivities)
'Kl n
~
(4) Y111 any cheaical• (especlally orgaalc •olveats or petroleua fuels) be stored ta above- ~
grouad or undnrground storage caNu7 If •o. vhat q pa• and Quantities of materials vill be
.to«d7 Yu V
No storage of chemicals on site.
4
" aroT-kn EMaoNMTAL osnixuzcz
(uAG I97-11-960) Seetloo 11 10 230(1) ~
E Et.'VIRONltE1rTAI. ELEMEiTS (continued)
£valuation Por
(5) uhec protectlve oeseuree vill be taken to lnsure that leahj or sp•11• o[ •ny chemicala Ageocy Uee Only
scored or uaed on eice vill not be •lloved [o percolate co groundveter (thie includee neasures
to keep cheaicalo out of dlsposnl sqstes• described ln 3b(2) aoA 3b(3)' ~
NonP ~
,
c t7ater Punoff (including stoca vacer) y_
(1) Describe the source of runoff (lecluding •cosm vacer) and set`wd of collection and dispo u 1
1f •ny (include Quanticiea, if kaovn) Vhere vill this water flov+ i7111 tRis water flov lnto
ocher vetece' If so, describe
WhPn thP cj-tP jq__-er_1a1med water runoff will no lonqer enter
the site. The source of runoff appears to be hillside
runoff that ponds in the existing topography - elevation 1950.
1
ThP riinnff r.omes from a backut) of water from Plouf Creek.
(2) aill •nr chenicale Ee •tored. handled or wed on che •ite in • lou cloa vhere a •pill or
lee~ vill drain co •urface or groundvater or to a scocm water dlspo"l syscm discharalrtg co
surface ot groundvater'
T~Tn
CJ'
Could vasce wterials enter gcound or ourface y ters' If •o, genecally describe .
No
G0, A ~
v
d Proposed measuree to reduce or tontTOl surface, gTOUnd. mnd runoff water lnpacts, lt •ny (lf
c che proposed actlon lies vithin the Aquifer Sensitive Aru De espacially elur on azplaastions
r relating co facilltles concerning Sectlons 3D(4). 3b(5). •ad 3c(2) o[ [his chockliat)
The areas where Plouf Creek has broken through will ~ Q
be repaired and all runoff will be allowed to naturally drain.
4 PIAV'T~
a
heck or circle type of vegeta[ion found on the site
X decfduou• cree alder maple •spen, othe '
_x evergreen tree f1r, cedar p!n other
• hcu bs
grese
pascure
crop or graia
vec soll pL ats, cattail, buttercup. Dullrw h, skuzLic eabbage. other
water plants water lilly, eelgrans, silfoil, other
X ocher type• of vegetation We e d s
MOSt ~tegetation 021 the
b 1Jhet kind •nd uouet of vegetation vlll De reaoved or altered'
site will be covered, except for the existing vegetation
(mainlv larqe pines) around the:perimetet - it will remain as a bufter to the landfill
c Lisc chreitenee or eadaa erce . After landfill 1S eompleted
g pecies lcaorn to be on or near the site
it will be covered with dirt
NQ"e TrnnT,7n
and reseeded.
d Proposed landscaping, use of native p Lnta, or othsr seasure• to presern or eahance vegetation
on che sice, if any
The existing Vegetation (mainly large pines) on the perimeter will remain as a screen
until (when or if) that area neeas to be tillea. xeclamation will include topsoil
to be brought in and grasses planted.
5
SPOKAKE ENVIROKHENTAL ORDINANCE
(uAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
8 EMYIROtdiENTAL ELETIENTS (continued)
~ . Evaluatton For ~
Agency Use Only
5 ANiMALS • '
a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the slte ar are kn w n to be on
or near the slte
birds hawk, heron, eagle. songbirCs, other
mamnals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other ~
fish bass, salioon, irout, herring, shellfish, other
f
other ~
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the stte
None
a
t
~
c Is the site part of a migration route7 If so, explatn ~
Unknown ,
,
d Proposed neasures to preserve or enhance witdlife. 1f any
T\TnnA
6 ENERGY AND VATURAL RESOURCES
a uhat kinds ot energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove. solar) will be useC to meet the
the camDleted project's energy needs' DescriDe whether it wili be used for heating, manufac-
turing, etc
The site will need electricity for power and heat to
the small office.
b would your projeCt affect the potenttel use of solar energy by aQjacent properttes' If so,
generally Eescribe
No
c What kinds of energy tanservation features are included in the plans of this proposal7 List
other proposed neasures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any
_ Nnt ar~r~l , r~ahl o
t
7 ENVIRONHENTAL HEALTH
a Are there eny envirorxnental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk ot flre
and exptosion, spill, or f+azardous waste, that could o a ur as a result of this proposal' If so, '
descripe
.
No - Th1S ls irit?r't material nrLly No dPmnlitinn nr nther
potentially hazardous materials.
I d
~
(i) Oescribe speciai en+ergency servlces that mlght be required
NnnP
~
~
6 ~
t
. ~
- ~ , sroKANE ENVIsOIOMNTAL oRnuvAacz
(uAC 197-11-960) Sectioo 11 10 230(1) ~ J b ERSrIROtIIMZRLAL LiMON'iS (continued) ,
~ evalw[lon For
EIiVIROTlMEtr:AL REAL-H (contlnued) Agency Use pnly ~
(2) Proposed oeasure• to reduce or control eoviroaaental health hasards, if an7 ~
s
Nnt an= 1 i r_ahl P ;
~
b Noise
(1) what type• of noise eYiat in the area vhich aa7 affnct your projeet (for euaple eraffic,
eQuipoent. operation, other'
There is already a landfill to the south that uses a bulldozer.
There is the railroad ana Disnman-Mica riitnway to tne north.
(2) Vlut types and levels of noise vould be creatsd bq or auociated vlch cAe project oo a
shoct-term or a long-tera Dasis (for ezaople craffic, conscruction, operation, othar)• Indleate
vhat hour• aolse vould come fros the site
The site would have trucks coming and going from 8:00 a.m. to 5 00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. A bulldozer would be used occasionally to move the material around.
The hul 1 r3n7.Pr wntil d bP in a a minimLm once a month,_as X fre uent as one to two
times a week.
(J) Proposed oeasure co reduce or control noise lopacts, if aoy '
Tr__gf f i r tarr l 1-nn 1 v hP a 1 1 nwPr1 to c-om nd gn cJu2z1na normal bus iness hours - Monda
throucrh Fridav. The dozer would operate on the same schedule. ~~4~~~4
~N~w hz
rt~:~ /~,Wt
8 UTD AND SHORELI'IP USE
a Vhat i• the CuTtent we of the site and adjacenc propercies' The site 1S currentlv vacant - It had been a sand and
aravel mine. South - There is an inert and demolition landfill; north - there are
railroad tracks and vacant lots;
b llas the site been used for •griculture' IE •o, Cescribe
No east - there is a golf course
' across Dishman Mica Road, West -
there is a cementary and large
residential lot.
c IIescribe any •tructures oo che site d Vill any scruccures be desolishedl If •o. vhlch'
NO ~
f
;
;
e ti!`tac is che currenc :oning classificatioo of the sitet r
TA b2 _c' cz9 n^v d to-~n _
{
f Whac i• che eurreat e m➢rehensive p Ln designatioa of the •ice' E
Urban ~
~
g If appllcable, vhac 1s the eurrene •horellne aucer prosru designatioa of the site'
Not applicable ,
~
,
,
h Hae aoy part oi che site been classified as ao 'environmanta.lly Nnsitlve" arw 7 If •o,
specify
~
rl n
~
1 Approximately hov oaoy people vould reside or vork in che coapleccd projectT ,
'ChP,re iozoulrl hA tLLCLt1L_thYPP n= 1 e work, nq at the site any given time.
7
SPUKANL IIMIYOMMENIJI. OxDIHAHCL
• (VAC 197-11-960) Scccion 11 ZO 230(1) j ^
E CIKIROFIIQIRA1. Q.EMERiS ( eont inved )
, °valwtlon For
~ Agencq Uee Only
j Approxlaacely hov aany people vould che coople[ed projett disp Lee? Po n e
k Proposed eeasuce• to •void or reduce displaement ispaeta. if any UQJ2.P
1 Proposed oesoure• to ensure the proposal is eoapatible vith e:isting aod pro k c[ed Lnd uses aod
plans, !f any
A zone change, variance, and conditional use permit are being sought to allow ~
~ ~
reclamation of this depleted qravel pit.
0
i~
.
9 HOUSING
a Approxlmately hov aaoy units vould De provided, if •nyt Iadicate vheCM r high-. siddlr . or
lorincone housing
Nnn,z
b Approxioatelr hov saar uaits, iE anp, vould De eliainatsdT indi u te vhet Mr high-, aiddle-, or
lov-incoae housiag
*Tt.n c
c PropoeeA aeasure• co reduee or control housing impaccs, if aay
No ne
10 A£STItEZICS
a What 1s the tallest helght of an7 proposed •tructure(e). not iocluding •atecaust Vfut i• the
princlpal exterlor building oaterial(s) proposed'
There will be a sinQle storv office approximatelv 15
feet high.
b tJhec vlew in che ieeediace vicinicy vould be •lteced or oEstructed?
TT~ r, r,
c Proposed measures to reduce or control resthetic lapaecs, if any
None
11 LIGH- AlJD CLARE
• '1Tut type of light ot glare vill che proposal producet tfiac tiie of day vould lt salaly occur'
There may be some licrht and alare at dusk when trucks will be using there lights.
There mav be a security liqht around the office area.
b Could lishc or a Lre fros the finished project be a satety hasard or intertere vith •iewf
No
c 1J1ut ezlstlag off-site •w rce• o[ light or g Lre may aflect youc proposa11
None
d Proposed acasure• to reduce or control ligh[ aod gLre Lapaets, Si any HOUrS Of operation will be from 8: 00 1.Ill.
to 5:00 p.m. - Monday through Friday. So most of the year there will be little need
for--ligfits. There may be security lights that would be directed away from
residential areas.
8
~ SPO[ARE LlIPIRONlENTAL ORDItiANCE
• (WAc 197-11-960) s«cioo ir io 230(i)
d GQVIRORMM"AL B.MSM (continued)
• , Evnlua[lon For -
12 RECR£AIION A3ency Use Only
a What designated and infonul recrettiooal oqportaaities •re in the lanediate vicinicy' `
T}'1PYP 15; a "nl'F Cnl]YsP f'(l the PaSf
b Yould the propoaed projecc disp Lee •nq e:istlag recreatioaal w es' If so, descriDe
No
€
c Proposed se.aaure• co reduee or eontrol iapacc• oa recreatioo, iecluding recreatioaa! opportuai-
[ies [o be provided br the project or •ppliunt, if aoy ~
!
None ;
k
. ~
13 HIS"ORIC AND C[3LTURAL PRESHRYA"ION
a Are chere any plaees oT object• liated on or proposed Eor aatioaal, state or local preservar
tion ngister• knovn to be on or ae:c co the site' If so, generally deacriDe
No
b Ceneraily descriDe anr landoarks or evidence o( hlstorlc •rchaeological, sclen[ific or culcural
ieportance Im ovn co be oa or next co the •ite
ThPYP l S (`Pme dY~z t"o 1'hP WP4f
c Proposed oeuure• to reduce or corttrol Lapacta, if •ny
Pr03ect will not disturb cementary activities.
14 -GAttSPOR"ATION
a Identify publlc streets and Rlghvers secving the •i[e aad descrlbe proposed acce u to the
e:isting street •yscea Shoroo site p L aa. tf •ny
The site is located at 44th and Sands. Access to the site would be from
Dishman-Mica Road, onto Bowdish Road to Sands Road.
b 1o elce currently servad by public traaait' If aoc, vhat 1• the •pproz3aate distance te the
nearest cranslt scop•
Nnt apral i raT~l P-
c flov sany parlc.ing spaee• vould the compleced project havet Hov aany vould the project eliniate'
There will only be a need for two or three parking places.
d Hill the proposal require ao7 oew road• or •treets, oT isprovemoto to e:leting roads or •cr at•
noc includiag drivevayst If no, aeoerally describe (lodiute vhether publLc or privace)
No
1
e V111 the project use (or occur ie the lmmedia[e Kcinicy of) mater, rall. or air traorpot[atioo' +
Lf eo, generally describe
There is a railroad that runs on the northern part of the site, but this ~
prnirzrt_ wi 1 1 nnt uti 1 izP i t nr i mnar4- i fi. i
~
t
f
9 ~
1
° • ~ SPOlCAHE LF7IRORCER'fdL QBDIltAt7CL `
(NAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11 i0 230(1)
b BRVIRONKUR'".AL B.QKENTS (eoatlnusd)
Cvalua[lon For
Ageecy Uoe Only 4
f Rov many vehicula[ [rlps per day vwld be geaerated by the caapln[ed project' IC kaovn,
lndiute vhea peak vould occur
The comDleted proiect will ctenerate approximately 25
truck trips per day.
g Proposed neasures to reduce or control transportatinn lapacts, if an7
None
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Uould the projecc result in an incrnased need for pnDlic ser►ices (for etasple, fire proteetion,
poiSce protection, health care, •chools, other)f If •o. generally describe
None
b Proposed veasures to reduce or control direct lapacts on public servlces, 1' an7
Nnnp
16 Q-ILI-IES
a Clrcle ut111ties cucrentlr aval L ble a[ the site electtleity, nscural gas, vater, refuse
service, telephone saoltary sever. •epcic systes, ocM r
None
b Describe the ucilitlcs that •re pTOposed for the projecc, t!u utility providing the se nice and •
the general constrvction accivlcle• on the •ite ot la the laaediace ricinitr vltiich oleht be
needed (i
~1fr`
R1 pctri ri tv wi 11 hP naPrIe-d. ~WW
C SICNAT[IRE f
~
I the underalgned, irvear under the penalcy of perjury that the above respormes are aade cruthfully and co the best of ay icaovledge I also
unde nraad chec, should there be •ny vlllful misrepresenu tion oT villful lack of Eull disclosure on Qy part, the IRencq aay vlthdrav any
determloa[Son of nonslgnificaoce ttut 1t night 1 u ue in reliaae upon this ehecVclisc
o•« ~-~Zy 9G Propooenc Inland Asphalt Company
(Ple u e Prlnc or Type)
~
Proponenc lldd[eas P.O. Box 3366
(Slgnature
Phone (509) 534-6221 Spokane, WA 99220
Persoa «p~~~ing rom Jana McDonald Da« 01/29/96
P,,,ne (509) 534-6221
POR S?AFP QSE OHLY
Staff omber(s) revieving checklist
Based on thi• staff reviev of the eavironneatal checkllst and o[her pertiaeac laforaa[lon, the staff
A Concludee cfiec chere are no probable •ignifiunt adverse lapacCs and receeaeod• a detecniaation of nonsignlflcaace
D Goacludee chac proEable •ignificant adverse environaental lmpact• do ezist for the current pcopoaal •nd recoanends a oicigated deter-
aloation of aonmignlficance vith cooditiocu
C Concludes that there are probaDle tignifiuat adverse environmental lapu t• aod recroseod• a deteeuination of aignificaoce
TILINC PEZ - =75 00
10
ZE-l3-O!!v
. . ~
, G INLAND ASPHALT LANDFILL
OPERATIONS/M-ANAGFMENT PI.,A.N
Inland Asphalt Landfill shall be operated in accordance with all local, state, and fedecal
regulations for the operation of Inert Landfills
1 Days of Operation: Monday through Fnday
2 Hours of Qperation 8• 00 A M to 5 00 P M
3 Sweepi,ng of Roads. Access roads will be morutored for trackuig of dut and
mud The road will be swept as needed or flushed
with a water tzuck
4. Noise Control All equipment will be operated only duruig the regular
hours of operation - weekdays 8(}0 A M to 5.00 P M
All equipment will be properly maintauied to adhere to all
noise regulations
5. Dust Control: Entrance to the active dumping area will be
treated with od or dust palliative to prevent dust Water will
be used to control dust for dumpmg actrvities Customers
with very dry loads will be asked to water loads at the source
6. Dump Procedures: Loads to be inspected upon entry for allowable materials
and dust Water will be apphed as necessary Tn.icks
will then proceetl to active dumpmg area
7. Matenal Accepted. The followuig matenals will be accepted if approved by
Spokane County Health Distnct concrete, asphalt,
clean fill diit, glass, and bncks
8 Water and Sewer: Water wl.l be suppued from Water Distnct #3 and a
portable toilet will serve the site
9 Reclamation See attached reclamation plans
ZE,-/3,-96
~
1 ' 1 4 /
~
II~TLAND ASPHALT LANDFILI.
RECLAMATION PLAN
(Also see attached wntten operation plan)
It is estunated that it will take approxunately 380,000 cubic yards of matenal to fill the
site The site will be reclaimed in a manner sunflar to the following descnption
1 The bottom portion of the site will be filled first to an approxinate elevation
of 1995-2000 (Phase I - 1996-2012)
2 After a level floor has been established, fill will then start to be sloped to
achueve the final plan (See Phase II, III, IV - 2012-2017)
3 The site wdl be covered with approximately 3-6 ulches of topsoil Clean fill
matenal that is brought to the site and is adequate for topsoil will be set
aside and used as such
4 After topsoil has been apphed, it will be catwalked and then seeded The
catwalked slopes will protect the seed from stormwater and ecosion
control
5. The following seed mixture (or similar) will be used to seed the site It will
be apphed at approx. 50 pounds per acre
30°b Wheatgrass **Please note that there are many vaneties
30 % Ryegrass of each of these grasses and the most
30 % Fescue suitable for the site will be used
10 % Lupine
' . SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
Z4NE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ~
PART I
A. GENERAL, INFQRMATIQN;
NAME OF A.PPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE Inlinci Ar,nhalt Co_
MAILIIVG ADDRESS P. 0 . Box 3366
CITY Spolcane STATE TaA ZIP 99220
PHONE ( 509) 534-6221 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, TNCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME PHONE
MAII.ING A.DDRESS .
CITY S TATE ZIP
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) Approx. 5.5 acres
ADJACENT A.R.EA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq f[ ) (1 arra :
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45334.9055
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED NA
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ,
EXIST'ING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) 1J'Z 3. 5- Januarv 1991
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY AAbandoned gravel pit
PROPOSED ZONDVG
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY 7Jrban
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Vill av
FIRE DISTRICT jrl
WATER PURVEYOR i`iter District #3
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufaccured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industnal ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other (X) - Descnbe Inert Landfill bv Conditional T1,Q P -rmlt
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY
B. LF. TAL,/z.ONE RECLA,SSYFICATZnN xNFnRMATIn~L-
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL North of 44t~1 and ~~ndc Rd
SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 25iq RANGE r,~
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS nlsliman Mica to Sands Road.
Road to the site
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD Approximately 635 feet o
2E-l3-9~
/ ZOIVL, RECLASSIFICAT A.PPLICATION Page 2 of 4
n -
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED A.RTERIAL (x) YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS ThQ Jite is SPrued bv Sandn Roaci t-o Di shman-Mn ra Rcl.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON PROPOSED
qPn Afitar}Ar~
EXISTING ZONE(S) UR-3. S TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ RR-10
, FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW See Attached
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN Ir
Not Applicable
WHAT ARE TH'E CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRA.NTED? The property was inapproprlately zoned in the zone
cross-over of 1991 when the cross-over faileci to recognize the former and
e:clstin; use or condition of the slte. (Abandoned aravel pit and need for
reclamation).
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPER'TMS? N,one - as there is a J.andfill ad1acerItt-o r.t~a-a3„ece of Froi~,_erty.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATIW 1) Existin3 landf ill and
reclamation adjacent to the site; 2) Error of zonin~ in the cross-over
inappropriate to the "conditson" of the Droperty.
WHAT MEASUKES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROFOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SUR.ROUNDING Lf1ND USE? 1) Interim Zonin2 to RR-10 dura.nq reclamallon only,
•
Rezone to Residential unon reuse of the site consistent wilb comnreh_nsiv_ 0ans
applicable to the property at that time; 2) Compllance with similar conditions
and performanc2 standards imposed upon the ad,7acent landflll; 3) Limit activity
to inert waste only_ SEE COil])II'IONAL US;' APPLICATI0N AND RECLArlATION PLAN
STIBMITTED THE';LT4ITH . /
~q, ~tka7~ c z
~
~
&.4
3+ 9~
Z
THIS SECTION OF THE r LICATTON WLLL PROVIDE THE PLANNY DEPARTIVfENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFTCATIC iAT THE APPLIC„4NT HAS HAD PRELIi. ARY CONSULTATION WITH TIHE
AGENCIES IDENTIFrED rcESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAI. SUBMITTAI. TC3 THE PLANN7NG DEPARTMENT
t t
FTRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~
B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (Ujw3~F) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FiRE
PROTECTION PUR.POSES Q
. C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW % 0 f~ , OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USL IS NOT DEFINITTVE, AND WII.L BE DETERMMD AT BUII..DDVG PERMIT
APPLICATION TTME
D REQUIl2EMENTS INCLUDE
scFPD gff-- (
FTRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/I"ITLE DATE
VVATER PURVEYOR
A SATISFACTORY A.RRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIl2E FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (~~.iiE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE
B REQUIREMENTSICOMMENTS SZAV1 Lf. 4 C-oNN ECT 1 ON ~EES-
'ft)(As'T aE pAiq) wRYE6 CPrn~ pf%Ovjt~~
S90KHNE CoN1irT r 'r►RTCV,
I • 2'qJ ' ~ G~
WATER DISTRICT GNA (I'ITLE DATE ,
COUNTY LNGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WTTH THE A.PPLICANT
A COMMENTS t
, ~6
~ ~
~ STGNA~ fI'ITLE DATE
COUNTY UTILITTES
,
A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (T-iAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN S TISFIED E DESIGNATED T9
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE TS ~.r~~>- .~ir 1D15
~
A COMMENTS ( C7 0( Ct r ~ ~'-C~ ~.C t',
_ S ~ ~3►/~
~ S~ IG NAT'URElTITLE DAT'E ,
- HEALTH DYSTRYCT
A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAE NERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR
SUEMITTAL OF THIS PRODnS 4L (HAVE) ~(I-iAVE NOT BFEN SATISFTED
A COMMENTS
/1 ~
l SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HA5 TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE
PROVTSION OF PC.TBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE A.PPLICANT
A COMMENTS QL-ID S k~~' ~-iMe- r4
S IGNATUR.E/TITLE D ATE .
~
.
- GONE 2ECLASSJ:FFICATIO PPLICATION . , Page 4 of 4
PART YII
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
Z. or~ i
y NED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATTON
TE~, TI-E ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION
9967 s~o~ crs r~~~ G D CZA& ~ DATE I( 2z j 9rC.
. ~L LAI+.
E7PIFiES 7117, 57 ADD Ess• ~ 90 9ArncLrn4~- R1( PxoxE• 92r. 137-7-
r
S . . ~ . zm 992-1 z '
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEA.R OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI,EDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE A.REA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OVijNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM '1HE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF
NAME Michael K. Murphy DATE 2-1-96
ADDRESS P.O. Box 3366 PHONE (509) 534-6221
Spokane, WA ZIP 99220
SI NATURE OF A.PPLIC OR PRESENTATTVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR A.FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
~ 1994 B Y ~ c c h a e~L.J ~ ~1.~cr j3 l~ y
re b r L1 0r ,
NOTARY SEAL 9'\ a,,t-~_r_J ~ ~
`
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residbng at slDO ko J
My appointment expues C2 ! 12-5 "00
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED B Y THE PLAIVNING DEPA.RTMENT) LuG
/
DATF, SUBMITIED FILE # y- 9
DATE ACCEPTE ~ ~ Co BY
~ v
TOTAL FEES RECEIPT #
.
r
Z ~ -13-q1o
_
. ,
,
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- RF~ -
TO Spokane County Planning Department, Steve Davenport
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard Si,
DATE February 21, 1996
SUBJECT• ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONS # DRE-172-96 / INLAND ASPHALT
The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change
are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
Design Review Meeting scheduled February 21, 1996
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer
E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer 4&em+; drainage and
access plans
E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
a detailed cawag.a T; urface water
disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased
E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer o sza'~0 =,ha41
A-ath standard enaineer3ng ra^~c Paving or surfacing as approved
by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
E51 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards
and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found
in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal
E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the -
proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone A development permit shall
be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within
any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 88-0521)
E58 No construction work is to be performed within the exista.ng or proposed right of way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sands Road as a 80 foot Minor Arterial The
existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The
Plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended a strip of
property 10 feet in width along the Sands Road frontage be set aside in reserve This
property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are
made to Sands Road
E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or
overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set
aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligatzon for
adDustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work
SPECIAL CONDITION The applicant shall provide an asphalt overlay for Sands Road as
prescribed by the County Engineer The overlay shall extend from Dishman Mica Road to
44th Avenue
SPECIAL CONDITION Trucks hauling to the site shall not use 44th Avenue or Sands Road to back
~
~
.
SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS: # DRE-172-96 / INLAND ASPHALT 2
up and access the site
,
PAGE 1 ' 08.40.57 08 FEB 1996
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
04415 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 CORNWALL RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 20
SANDS RD 00 920 CAMERON RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 18
SANDS RD (END) Ol 280 VALLEY CHAPEL RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
04417 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 SOUTH END TO ELDER R R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
SANDS RD 00 500 ELDER RD R 09 GR.ADED/DRAINED 10
Ol 010 STOUGHTON RD R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
02.030 CONNOR RD R 09 GRAVEL 26
02.040 BR 4405 OVER CALIFOR R 09 GRAVEL 26
02 180 QUAKING ASPEN LN R 09 GRAVEL 26
02.250 PALOUSE HWY R 09 GRAVEL 26
02.380 PAVEMENT TO GR.AVEL R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
02.540 WASHINGTON RD R 09 GR.AVEL 28
03.550 GIBBS RD R 09 GRAVEL 24
04.330 BRUNA RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 24
SANDS RD ( END ) ,Q 5. 3 2 0 MAD I SON RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
04418 SANDS RD (START) 00.000 44TH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 40
SANDS RD 00.280 BOWDISH RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
00 290 BR 4520 OVER PLOUF C U 16 PAVED 36
SANDS RD (END) 00.380 BOWDISH RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
04419 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 DAY MT SPOKANE RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
SANDS RD Ol 370 HALLIDAY RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 16
SANDS RD (END) 01 470 WOOLARD RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
04421 SANDS RD (START) 00.000 BIG MEADOWS RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
SANDS RD 00.250 WILD ROSE RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 16
01 260 BLACK RD (START) R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 14
SANDS RD (END) 02 260 TALLMAN RD R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 16
04416 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 VALLEY CHAPEL RD R 09 GRAVEL 12
SANDS RD (END) 00 560 BAKER RD R 09 GRAVEL 12
04420 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 DAY RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 28
SANDS RD (END) 01 270 DAY MT SPOKANE RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 28
04698 SANDS RD (START) 00 000 48TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40
SANDS RD ( END ) 00 040 4 7 TH AV ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40
8 Records Processed
PAGE 1 ' 08 41 16 08 FEB 1996
Road# Road Names MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info .
05982 44TH AV (START) 00.000 DYER RD (END) & EAST U 19 PAVED 40
44TH AV 00 770 THIERMAN ST (START) U 19 PAVED 40
05983 44TH AV (START) 00 000 WEST END TO SCHAFER U 19 GR.AVEL 16
44TH AV 00 380 SCHAFER BRANCH RD (E U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18
00 670 LOCUST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 700 FARR RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 760 FARR RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 24
00 880 WOODRUFF RD U 17 PAVED 26
00 990 SCHAFER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 26
01 180 PONDRA DR (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 24
01 210 RAYMOND RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 24
01 320 UNIVERSITY RD (START U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
01 380 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
44TH AVE 01.490 FOREST MEADOW DR (ST U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
44TH AV 01 530 GILLIS ST (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
Ol 630 HOLLOW ST & CT (STAR U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
01 7QL-SKIPWORTH ST (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
44TH AVE 01 720 BOWDISH RD (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 24
44TH AV C0-l-900 l 890 BATES RD (END) U 16 PAVED 40
44TH AV (END) SANDS RD (START) U 16 PAVED 40
05984 44TH AVE (START) 00 000 CONKLIN RD (START) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
44TH AV 00 060 CONKLIN RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 18
00 500 CHAPMAN RD (START) R OS LIGHT BITUM 24
44TH AVE (END) 00 530 CHAPMAN RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 24
3 Records Processed
Tra f f i c Count s'
Road Name . . Location . Leg Count .
44TH AV at SCHAFER RD (START) E 1815
44TH AV at SCHAFER RD (START) W 2116
44TH AVE at BOWDISH RD (START) E 338
44TH AVE at BOWDISH RD (START) W 3313
44TH AVE (START) at CONKLIN RD (START) E 206
S P O K A N E ~t C O U N T Y
DEPARTMENT OF $UILDING AND PLANNING • A Ui1'i510N OF THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMEM
JANiES L. IviANsotv, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
NiEMORANDUN1
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane Counry Division of Engineerinc,
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane Counry Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
Bill Hemmings, StoiTnwater Utility
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundai-y Review Board
Central Valley School District
Spokane County Water District No. 3
Fire District No. 1
Washington State Department of Natural Resources
FROM: lohn Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE: February 7. 1996
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Rural
Residential-10 (RR-1 0), with a Conditional Use Pernlit and Variance
APPI,ICATION ACCF.PTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEVV MFETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1996 AT 1:15
COUNTY PI,AN'NING CONFERENCE "OM, 2ND FI.OOR
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DFSIGN REVIEW IviEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the
attached form to Steve Davenport for the meecing. The attached APP[.ICAT[oN
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact
Steve Davenport of the Planning Department at 456-2205.
c: Inland Asphalt, 5111 East Broadway. Spokane, WA 99212
Attaehments: Application Acceptance and Desiim Review Form. Project Ue~ign. Site Pian
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 4564703
PtlwvtNG PHONE• (509) 456-2205 • Fwx: (509) 456-2243
TT)D- f 5091324-37 66
,
J
Design Review fot Febiuaiy 21, 1996 at 115
Zone Reclassificatton from Uiban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Rural
Residential-10 (RR-10), with a Conditional Use Perm.lt and Vaiiance
Generally located noith of 44th Avenue, east of and adjacent to Sands Road
in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 Noith, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Urban and within Che Piioiity Sewer Service
Aiea (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone Reclassification ftom Urban
Residentta]-3 5(UR-3 5) to Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), and a
Conditional Use Pelm.tt foi an inert landfill and a Variance from the 10 acre
minlmuin lot size requiremenl specified by Section 14 606 240 1(a) of the
Spokane County Zoning Code
PARCEL NUMBER 45334 9055
SITE SIZE Approximately 5 5 acres
APPLICANT Inlanci Asphalt Company
Jana McDonald
5111 East Broadway
Spokane, WA 99212
(509) 534-6221
ASSIGNED PLANNER Steve Davenport
' SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLYCA.TI4N ~
PART I
A. GENERAL, INFQRMATInN:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENI'ATIVE Inlinci Asnh31t Co_
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. 3ox 3366
CITY Sj)olcane STATE iaI ,4 ZIP 99220
PHONE ( 509 ) 534-622I (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME PHONE
MAII.ING A.DDRESS
CITY STATE ZIp
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq f[) APProx. 5.5 acres
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) 0 arrP :
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45334. 9055
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADIACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED NA
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATTOIV(S) (DATE ESTA.BLISHED) Ulr: 3. S° Janiiarv 1991
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Abandoned gravel pit
PROPOSED ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY ~lrban
SCHQOL DISTRICT Centr_il Viltiv
FIRE DISTRICT
WATER PURVEYOR Mter T)istrict #3
PR4POSED USE OF PROPERTY •
Single family dwellings Duplexes Mulufamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Tndustnal ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other (X) - Descnbe Inert Larid.Eill bv ronditzunaT T1.P P-rr,p2_t-
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIVVOLVING THIS PROPERTY
B. LEGAL/Z-ONE RE.LASSIFIC;QIInN-IaVFnRUATION;
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL North of 44t'1 and F)~Udr, Qr1 _
SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 2- SiN RANGE 44M
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS »YS'1jfl1R ~Ixca to Sands Road. S3nds
Road to the szte
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD Approximately 635 feet o
ZONE, RECLASSTFICA" 4 APPLrCATTON ~ . Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (x) YES NO
NAME(S) OF A.RTERIAL ROADS The site 1.,q serveci by Sand_^, Road to Dishman-M ~a Rd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
~:aa Atfiarhr,rl
EXISTING ZONE(S) UR-3. S TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ RR-10
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW ~ee tlttached
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
Not Applicable
WHAT A.RE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? ThP property was inappropriately zor.ed in the zone
cro ss-over ot 1991 when the crosa-over .£ailerl to recounize the former and
e:istinry use or condition of the site. (Abandoned aravel pit and need for
reclamatlon).
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES') 'Vone - as there is a landfill acliarenL_Jo t,hjLS niece of DroDertv
_ !T J .
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? 1) Existln3 landf ill and
reclamation ad,7acent to the Site; 2) Error Qf zonino in the cross-over
inappropriate to the "condition" of the oroperty.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROLJNDING LAND USE? 1) Interim 7,oninQ to Rn-10 durino reclamation only.
Rezone to Residential unon reuse of the site cons1stent wlth r-omFrehensivP -g,1ans
applicable to the property at that tirne; 2) Compliance with similar conditions
and performance standarcls imposed uuon the adjacent landfill; 3) Limit activlty
to inert waste only. SEE COP1))ITIOPdAL US E APPLICATION AND RFCLA14ATION PLAN
SUBMITTED THEnLTn1ITH.
THIS SECTION OF THE Au, t,ICATION WrI,L PROVIDE THE PLA.NNT'''" DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFTCATIC' ''3AT THE APPL~GAItTT HAS HAD PRELr; kRY CONSULTATION WITH TIHE
AGENCIES IDENT'IFLED. _SULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSUL"i-ATION SHALL BE INCOR.PORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANN7NG DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FTRE DTSTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FfRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FA,CILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PLTRPOSES. Q
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ( r-~ rD ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFMTIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMIIVED AT BUII.DING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUTREMENTS INCLUDE:
ccr""' oFm 2 ~60
scFPD tt / F4A"---
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGENLENTS FOR DQMESTIC WATER AND FTRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (~~i~E) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQULREMENTS/COMMENTS: SZKV 1C-f- 4 Colv1V EcT 1 Oi~ ~E-F-cl
7'hUS-T li!Z NAlD U-IfOF4 vvR`fEA C4N 6it-
~~oKHN~ Cot,{NT Y WF}TEV,
pJSl6k-lc-T / e.'~~1~~~ 1 • 29 ' 9 ~
WATER DISTRICT GNA /TITLE DATE
,
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE A.PPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: i
. /
- ~
~ 31
SIGNA /TITLE DATE
COUNT'Y UTILITYES
.
A PRELIMINA.RY DISCLJSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIkEMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPflSAL (HAVE). (HAVE NOT) BEEN S TISFIED. E DESIGNATED
~5
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS S ~.~ll•- ~ ;c
A. COMMENTS: l a0C ~'r-;A r ~~-~•'~,C S~~~°~.cc ~ ,
! S~IG~NATURE(TITLE DATE
HEALTH DTSTRYCT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEIV PLAE.~-~ NERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUEMITTAL OF THIS PROPOS.AL (HA'VE) (~(HAVE NO'r)BFEN SATTSFIED.
A. COMMENTS: eu-&-L ; c- Wa`-A--~`-- ~~'~i~~
'o - s -
~
~ SIGNAT[JRE/TTTLE r DA1`E
4
SEVt'ER PUR'VE'YOR
A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVTSION OF PUBLTC SEWER ARE UNDERST40D BY TKE A.PPLICANT.
A. CQMMENTS: QLAD 5k~ 4-e-,Me-~'t
/
f ~
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE _
r:..._
Y' .
' 1 •
- , 2:ONE :tECLASSIFICATTOI 'PLICATTON ` . Page 4 of 4
~►~w ' E: ,~~-~1. PART III . _ ~
SURVEYOR VER.IFTCATTON
or
NED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED TF-E INFORMATION
' TE T~ ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIl'''ION.
c!-
Q '•~TvR 9967
.FC~srt ..~..~-5~.~ G D: ~~~a~ DATE: ~ I Z8 l 9l.
r ; AL LAI`EXPIRES 7r171 yj ADD S: 9e) 9 PHONE: 7< <o ° 737-7-
V GAi zIP: 9921 L .
,
PA,RT IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, TFE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFLRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MA.DE TRUTHFULLY AND TO TF-E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. '
I FURTHER SWEA.R OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACI'ION, OR, IF NOT THE OVVNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
NAME: Michael K. Murphy DA.I.E: 2-1-96 •
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3366 PHONE: (509) 534-6221
Spokane, WA ZIP; 99220 •
1
`
SI NATURE OF APPLIC OR PRESENTATTVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss: ,
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND S WORN OR AFFTRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
re b Y U C? r y , 1994 B Y
1 ...J
.
~IOT,4R Y S EAL ~
`
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at: SlJD k CL ~-J
My appointment expires: C~z - 125 -oo
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED: FILE DATE ACCEP'TED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
-
.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ~
PART I
A. GENERAL INFnRMATiQN:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: In1znd t1;nh31t Co .
MAII.ING ADDRESS: P• 0. 3ox 3366 .
CITY: Spolcana STATE: Taa ZIP: 99220
PHONE: (509) 534-6221 (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZLP: PROTECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) APprox. 5.5 acres
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. fc.) n arrPn .
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 45334. 9055
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT A.REA OWNED OR COiNTROLLED NA
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) U:t . 3.5 Januarv 1991
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Abandoned gravel pit
PROPOSED ZONING 71,"?--10
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY ~lrban
SCHOOL DISTRICT Cenr_r3l Villnv
FTRE DISTRICT
WATER PURVEYOR .4ater T)istrict #3
PROPOSED USfi OF PROPERTY: •
Single farnily dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other (X) - Describe: Inert Landfill by rondi ti onal T1,P ~zrmij-
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTNIENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
B. I,E rAL,/ZQNE RECLA.SSIFYCATInN I~LEnRMATIni
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: North of 44t'z and S3nds, Rd -
SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP ~ 5`I RANGE " r,•T,,'v
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: nis'un,~n Micz to Sands Qoad Sanj'a
Road to ttie site
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: Approximately 635 feet.
PART IZ
THYS SECTION OF THr '°PLICATION WILT, PROVIDE TH,E PLA1' G DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
. WRITTEN VERIFICA'T, THAT TH.E APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELiMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENT"IFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE NC4RPORAIF-D
' IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FTNA.L SUBMITTAL TO 'T'HE PLAMvING DEPARTMElVT.
FIRE MARSHALLiFIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PRQPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~
ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (Ujk*E) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NTEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITTES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOS ES . Q
C. RECOIWIMENDED FIRE FLOW: % r-~ fD ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINI?TWE; ANU WILL BE DETERMQYED AT BUII.DING PERMIT
A.PPLICATION TIME.
D . REQLTIREMENTS INCLUDE:
0'2-- 2
Sc,FPD ~ ~ &A"--
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATIJRE/T'ITLE DATE
WATER T'URVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIR.E FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQCJIREMENTS/COMMENTS: ~~ANI1« 4~ CoN N-EcT 1 vN FFE S
7ou S-T E!Z pA M -faPA~ w RTEA «N 6t-
~9~ ~~GT T Y ''N *T ~W'~ 'A,dxel .7%
WATER DISTRICT -9TGNAfURE/TITLE DATE
COUNTY ENGTNEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FQR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
, - ,
~
SIGNA ~T'ITLE DATE
COUNTY UTII.ITIES
,
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL kEQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PRQPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN S TISFTEll. E DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ +Lh~~ - W~t -.5 A. 1 ~'~~~x se-VILCt
TS: /C>o(Gyr~~'~-o `W•'<.f '
A. COMMEN
~ s i.A► /au.
V SIGNATURE/7ITLE DATE .
HEALTH DTSTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAK.EN PLAEF;~--GFivERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUEMITTAL OF THIS PROpOS.4I. (HAVE) ~'(HAVE NOT BEEN SATTSFTED.
A. COMMENTS: FUI-< < c- W0.~-/
~ .1 /1~
~
~ SIGNATURE/TITLE DAT`E _
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN FLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A.RE UNDERSTOOD BY THE A.PPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: \)L-~ D
6
S IGNATURE(TITLE DATE
- :
- - " JKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPr .,<TMENT
APPLIC'ATIONS BEFnR_E` TRE, 'ZnNINC An.1USTQR
Name of Applicant: Inlanci Asphalt Co. Agent: Y Nc/o Jana McDondlci
Street Address: E. 5111 Broaclway
City: S Dakane State: Wp Zip Code. . 99212 Phone - Home:
Work:534-6221
Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): Inland Asnhalt
Street Address: Same as ahove
Zip Phone - Home:
Ciry: State: Code: Work:
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate acrion):
6ariance(s3) CCondi6onal Use Permit Expansion of a
Uther: Nonconforming Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violarion/
Section Township Range Enforcement: Y N
•Lot and legal checked by: •CWWP sewer purveyor:
•CWSP water purveyor: •CUP standards met: Y N NA
•Existing zone: Cite applicable section:
•Comp. Plan designation: •Artenal Road Plan designation:
•Fire District: •Person doing preapp conf.:
•Other/previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
•Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.:
'•Hearing Date: •Site plan dimensioning checked by:
ASOUT THE PROPERTY (by applicant)
•Existing use of property: Abandoned Gravel Pzt - Zoned UR3. 5
•Describe proposed use of the property, notin change from 'existing use': Proposing inert
T,andf il l to reclaim gravel pit ° aee~cin,, zone RF--10
•If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable
terms (i.e., SO feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): 14.606. 240 #11.a. - thP lot is
rhan 10 acres. it is approY. 5.5 acres
•If a conditional use permit application, does propo 1 meet all standards? Y
If not, has one or more variances been requested?Y N
•What is the size of the subject property. APProx. 5.5 acres
•Street address of property (if known):
•Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable):
•Parcel No(s).: 45334. 9055
•Source of legal: Title Report
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: I`lone
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? Oti-iners of the property
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S
COUNTY 4F SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERT(JRY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF
THE -ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND
. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Signed: Date
Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, residing at
. My appointment expires:
pagc 1 of 2
ZA/APP (REV. 4N4)
. •A. BURDEN OF ' -)OF form(s) (by applicant)
~ It is necessary for the arr,icant or hisiher representaave to establish the reasons why the
• REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argumenc in favor
of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your application. .
B. SIGN-OFF BX COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
(applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circled below)
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DYSTRIC
a) FroPosed method of water suPA1Y:_
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal-~__ 4cle /411:4f"
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicanc has bee nformed
of re iremen[s and standards. We request consultation with Planning De artment Y~I P
~ (Signature) MaO (Sign-off Waived)
2. SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(Engineering & 12oads Division)
A prel' ' consultation has e n held to discuss the proposal. T'he applicant has been infonned
of requi eme ~s-~ n S. request consultation with Planning Department Y N
~ c o ~ ~4
U (Signature) I (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
3. SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive
if outside VVWMA)
A preliminary consultaaon has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requirements and standarda.
. ~
ty
~ t, & A
. "J t. .(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planning?)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with ~CL--JD :z
to become informed of water system
requirernents and standards. (See #a below)
e appl'cant is required co discuss the proposal with Sx. VA'L_
~~-~c to become informed'{ of sewage disPosal
requirem6nts and standards. (See #b below)
a . WATER PURVEYOR: S90)C4N6 COu NT Y ►NATE4~ WS74''>I L7
1) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our future service area. N/q
2) The proposal ~ia/iwwrt located within the boundary of our current district.
3) We U~[pm=vo, able to serve this site with adequate water.
4) X~~factor y arr m e ts }~have nqt been made to serve this proposal.
, F W~~7`2~ 9~
~ 9~
(Signa`(ure) (Date) -
~ L ~ O 5~ A~evv~ ~.1
b . SE'PVERAGE PURVEYOR: . r
A preliminT consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been
informed of uireme ts and; s d ds.
~ . ~
(SignaCure) (Date)
page 2 of 2
ZA/APP (REV. 4/94)
F. ,VIIT CENTER PASSPORT
Date: / ~'J • Number:
,
Name Phone
Add ress
,
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING
/
.
. .
:
. : . . , ;
. . : . : -
~:HUII.rDING:.:Department PL-ANNING:Department ENGINEER;S:Q0
i Addressing ~ Adruin. Exception s Approach Permit
i Building Permit _ Arterial Rd Plan Info i Flood Plain Permit
i Code Information _ Binding Sitc Plan Info i Public/Private Roads
i Commercial Review i Cert. of Eacemption i Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
Conference Comprehensive Plan i Site Drainage Info
i Energy Code Info i Cond. Use Pcrmit i Subdivision Review
~Fire Safety Revicw ~ Nonoonforming Use ~ Utility Percnit
•
Manufactured Home Permit Review - Zone Change Review
Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info
Other Pemiits Short Plat Info NO --E REQUIRED
i ~ ~Revicwer Ticne out
i Plumbing Pcrmits _ Subdivision Info J L~,( / L~,i_ I
i Private Road Info i Temp. Use Permit ~U1ILITIES;O~~"~~rtimeiit`~~`;~~~~=:'~~•~
Residential Review Variance Appl. i APA Payment
Sewer Permits Zone Cricck Cert. of Exemption
Zone Info Subdivision Review
LJLID/Scwcr Info
- - ,
'iGo0
f; Zone Change Review ~
I
NO ••E, IZEQ UIIZE D NO I-E- E R EQ UIIZED
Reviewer TIR1C OUt Reviewer Time out Rcviewer Time out
~
MAS'IERWASSPORI.CTR 2J1&'93 .
♦ . ~ ~ ~ ~
Cie . . ~y ~ .
c ; 4, tiit~h'+ a ; ' ~ . • ; ~
:
r►~~Fn , W ~ ~ ~ 0 U a • ~
• . ~ ;
0~ " ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ; v
z : a
~ ~ ~
o„►~ • I . •
~ jr t- ~ ' • _ _ - : s y1 , ~ ~
ARBLE c. ~ y .7 , ~ ptLS ~ ~ • . ~ •
, t ~ • x : w~ , , ~ : m
. ~ S~ , a • • ~ ~ ~ : • ' ~ . '
~ a ~ ~ • ~
.y7i' y~ a ~ • • • . ~ ~ a
. ~
~ d piERa" (P . ~ • ~ oovw~'~ ' :
. .
. t . ~ ' ' ~ ~
. ~ ~..r.-- : '
~►GH . - - • ~ I . ~n : t~ , . ; . ; P_
~ ~uw Y ; ~ . . • .
. . ~
1('~ J• ~ ` ~ ~ . • • • ' ~ T.
. J
~00~7~1d R ~ ? j W • ~ ; pj/>~„~..~',..~',~.+:*."'^`'' S~ ~ • ; 1
~ z ~ ~ • R,, y. . Q ' t~'.,s-.s-- , • . ~{1wt~d~
► ~ ~ 1 :'3 'w 4
~ a •
.
w '
• c \ ~ ~ L ~ :~~Z' '~~~~e~a . .
~ ~ ~ ' • .
~ .
• ~
. ;
•
. . 8 ~
i r e rk , ~ ,O • • Y R • ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ :
a ~ ~ _ • v+
IL/
• . ~
. :
' • - . : . .
+ • • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ Z Z ~ • 1 s, f. ~
~~1~~•~•~.•,•'rli ~ • p
a i- • • ~ :
. ,
. . • •
~ , ~ . . • .
~ ~ p ~ ~'L, .
~~~r'' • , •
~ ta ah,~ t,:.,• ~~o
~.ID ~
~ Ah15b~'"1 • - ~
M '
~ • . ~t-"~' ~ _ . ~ t"!
..r :j ~
Hnw
_13_961CI. 1Ew,1-'96NE=4-96 -
ZE
3 4 T 1-t ~•1 : ~vE. 6 • :
: ; .-~•s .r.~ . r-. . ♦
34TH ' , • • ~ ~ ~ . y ;
~ Z N
~ ~ySTH AYCL.~ ' ~ • .
Z , . .
Z °J ~ • • NuLe ~ S µ ~ • ~
J~ • ~ ~
%
. . to _ ,~,L04t/~ GT , ~ ~ : Qt . ~ ' ~p'4 e-
t • G
~ • 35Tt~t GT. . ~A • N . r~ : ~
/1vE URw3*$
~R=3s 3teT~.t ~ r ,
~ ' ~ ~ . ~ ,r~ .
• .
^ 3TTH ~ /~VE. : 3 ~
• • -~i
• • • • Y
~ • • ~
♦ ~
d Z •
WwIS Or
. o
~ f ~ , s ~
3~ T b ~ ' •
df ' 40 TH /SVE.
- ~ . . .f.....y.. . . . •ti~+~
' -
~ . ~3 .
~
IQ/0 A Nn. .
ot
W Z ~ 1~ •
ua,
URw3 5 0:
s ` ' ~~~1
r--S r
~ • ~
• Q s'' ~ a ~ r'" ~ r-j 1..r ~
a a? U "
/ ~ ' •
cNEsTULM I,~
6 th -St a
~ , .
E N CE,,,
. ,,.n.
-1...~..,.:.• :i.~ ..r : . . . ~ .
.w y T►.10 PE f7-=
R=3
W ~ .
c~ 3 • ~ / .
AVE. UR ~05
u ,`•f .1 . 0) r Q SRMI .
~ ~ aYTU ~ ,
~ ~
4 7 rN AY c ~~9 c~ t ~ ~ • . • ~
_j F RaE • r`~
'~rA~..•.ti1•j. . . ' V
. • ` ~
. •
W ~c~ ~ • C
g ~ ~ . , ~
~.Q' .
i ~ : ~ ~
m ~
~ • ~ u .
~ .5
~
'T
~ ~ u 2 r C ~
UR.4
. .
~ ~ ,°~~►+F
~ ~ f . '~o..~ . • ~ ~j
►
`
~ 5/1f96 HF.C Staff Report for 2E-13-96/CU& 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 2
r
~ ZEml3m96/CL-Em1=96/VE= -
4 96
/ v~~. ~tn j - - ~ . ]'T ~ T - ~ • `~..~r~ ~i ~ ~ `
` p AI L • ~I ^ ~ _ia~ A r _ t ` ~
~ ~ s -•.,,~~-'_'j- _ ~ '
,~i~ w' ` ~~j ~ , 1 M ~ • -'~j ~ .
28
{ ti sAmolm.
28 • ~ ti - ` : ; .
'jo;~ • t
~ = •~I ' r It. ~.T.. r' - • ~ ` ~ •~.y ? ' -
~ WNt
F _ i .c JOij~4" . 'x ~oiJ;` ~ _ ' ~
~ •
8M
~ ~~.q • . ! - - ~
, `•r . ~ _ _ . . a
~ ` ` ' ~ , . ~L~~w ~ ~ ~ ~ : r f ~ • ~ .
~ ~ + ~ ~ , "~i► ' ew t ; z' . ? ei
~ .~~ap - , . , . - y,~- • i7o_
33' -33
34 • ~ ~
. • ~ ~ ~
_ ♦ ' ' rL~~i~.:. ''fW~l(: ~ . . •R. t~' = .
. - • ; ~ • ~ ~~n' • .t ' •.r: . • ~ . , ~i10YV~ • . . . , ' , I
~ ~ ri ~ ~y t' , . . . ~ , : • . .r' , ~ . Lr
• .
~ ~ - ~t • - .34..
. - . ~3~~~~ . . ~ _ ,
33 . . . t.
. , '4"~nr. .v - - • _
~ ' • ~ - ' i.~ . . ~ ~ . . •
• ~ ~ ' • . i • ; . . ~ : • , r~,'
. (,~~A • • ' ~r' . , ^ , `l~~~ - _ '
~ . • ~a~• 4b • • ,
, • I C~~ ~ . ~ i ti I 1 .
. • ' ` • ~ • Ch~st~e ~ I ~ - - ~ w
. , . ~
, . . . ~
~,ti.~o . ~eqa.• • ' t
4 o
. . . ~ - i .
• p
. ~ a • • ~
.
• ~d _ ~ ~ .
~ • . ~ • . d .
• ~ i~. , 1 ~ ~
~ ~
. . . • .
, . . , . „s,.._ t 0 .
. . ~
~ ~ r ~ ~ •
• ~
. ~ . . . ~ ` `
• ~ ,~-l • -
4 .
♦ y ` ' °o
~ 1 1` ~ r~..,,~ ~ ~ j • ~ ~ -t '
•f ~ .r..~ ~ /1 1 - • f
- r . • l
] _ : . ` . • t. ]
~ ' ~ ' r ~ ' - - • ~ : r, '
'7.
~y, , ~ r_ ~r,- _ , ~
/ ~ J ~ ~ • . 1 t
~ - ,
) ~ • L-. ; _
000
_ ` ~ ' 1 I .
1 _ \ "
~ l~ . jt~~., ~ 1!! ~.~r, ~c ~ : i: ~ ~ n~
5/1/96 HEC Staff Report for ZE-13-96JCUE-1-9&VFr4-96 Page 3
. i
-13-96/CLTE 4w96/VE=4=96
ZE
Vw~~~
~ 28 ---lij Terrac VIe*
i - iki • . , i PrIL .
• •~i ~2V ' , ~ ~ ~ . ` I
Q 8:
W!1 0
a~ ' ..yk
JOl~.~% W I
srs~ ' ~ W
00 i . 1 1v_ • . ~
~ . . ~ M i
n • - J1. y►
~
Q , 1?D ' ' ; ~ • A VII
~ • . ~ V~ ~ t . . ~ ` • r ~ 4
. < 33 33 O ! ~ 34
' f - e I I • ~ ' c - ~
• ~ •a •s• • 6 f • r~ r~.
: . . • ~ ~ ( v Z
•
. ~ . ~ ~
' ' • = f
~ • i~ ~ ~ n
• ~
. ; , ~ • 34
. . : ~
,3 - • • ~Epp- andpit
• ~ t V- • - ' w ~ ~ Q• ~ ~ •
, • A~'~. /C ~ : ~,Q , .4 . . o .I ~ J
~ ~
A + ~ : , \ ~ ~ • • ~ ~
I • ~ ;~r.We'~ . ; >tp ~
• ~ I '
s + r ~ 09 r • r0l0 , ~ • i
ter
~ ~ ~ ~ • ( ~ ,i
~ • ~ ~`O - ~f ~
►
~ . ~ * i ~ . • ~ t , • ~ ~ ~ • ` 1~''i
• . • . • • ' ♦ , r--- .
• ~ • • ' _ . _ a s • A
i
• ~ \ d X,/
.
~ , 0 • ~ d ' If~.~ 'L •
. . 191
. : . ~ . : 804 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ •
• • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ Wfll • ~ V
.
. . ,~t ' • s°?~ia
~ . .
' ' 4: Q : ~ ~ ~ ~ '
T.
a
14 • . Q ~X
:
fl~ 4
. ° `U~ ~ • ' ~
0 `
( t d y • i
~ ) ~ • t • \
> ~ ~'l, ~ • ` ♦ ~ \
,j~ .d - ~ .
1 ` ^ 1 ~ ~
. t , ~ ~~1` ~ 1 , ~
~ V~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 1 ' N ~ NI
= roas
' ~ \ ~ _ , ~ ( ~ I • .
1 - , . ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ ,
~ ~ .
~ . • r \ r ~ ~ r ~ 1 ' ~
~ .r '.i r _ . • -
5/ 1/96 HEC Staff Report for Z& 13-961CUE- 1-96/VE-496 Page 4
~ ' ' ~ , - •
\ l,~ 1;~.: ~T'Irr 'f'i. ' . •e 1' ~ ' ~ ,
~ 1 ' ;ft ' l 1~•• ~
3ou'-
' ~ : ~ , .E~f~ ' . . . . ~ "~1~~; _ .
k Accrss • ' :I~ ; ;-~~.y ~.r .
\ ~ 1~;~~1~1,'`'~ a • . ~ ,
1. , ~ ~ . ' i ,r ~ ~ : 2: '
cNE
` P':'~ r~i ~ , ~ -
I ' L", }1~;~ _
tp 1 ~ i•~r _ ' I( ' ~ •
QN ~ /I~ 'fp ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ I i' ,~fll•~~hrJilrl ~1 • ~7~~ ;~T ~ ~ `
, ~ O 1~ , ~
t I ~ , • ' y
~ ~~~1~ ,~•,ui j'~ ' ri...~ I
~ ~
.
~O ~.p ~1.. t~1_4.~~,,i AM~' ~ 27
m 1 fy i ~i Y•.rl•.~{f~~ I~r~C•~~~ I~ U~~~~~ r ~n,~v . ~ d.ll
r
N ` ~ e~ I N ~ ,~.J~ .~.►~1 dt
~,1, ~ \ ~~%'S"~~~ ~i,i~~ ~ Sr %W~'•.
a C : ~o' ` ~ o;r.~, \ „~'.{:.J_j,~ ~.y;~) I.''~~ ,.:.J• '~I~,i` i .W:,
~1 ~ ,V ~ ...i •1~~~~~1 ~i ( ~e;,, li ; I ,;lf~ N~
~ i~ . ~1, ~1:~~i~~;~~,~~+ ...I..
~ ~ M S~a9t~~Q ~~h•~ ~ X ~l~/'rtl~An;, v~ 5~~
~ ~ / ~ ~I•~.,.
O lO : Q/1!~ ti•~(c~~~~ro iD (~uirlP I • ,r I`,"0 ' > . ' .
A2 ~ l ~ IJ JI~~ ~
rt ~ `Z i ; Gl/ w ~ ~J . j V...,....F~tl i ~^C~~-~•~ ' ~ ~ , . ,,,,r~,~+ : ~
, I I~ ~ l f ~ ~ . ~r',~,I ~ • , ~ w yr• ~
0
N
VICinI"'Y N~AP
~
1%
01 1 ~ ~ .
\ -
C7 ~ ~ t ~ ~ •
m i L J ~ ( I-
/
' ~ t•~,~, ,J ler
G 11 J ' ,
m 1; I
I ~ •~S;- JIr Ukr»~ G~i~lOC1dN0 b~
~ rv+cy
S e d /Z ! ~...ne , P~~-~y I ; ~ _
~ i~ci~~i/, r'Irf+vitirr5 ~ _ ~ound~V . I
I
, ~ . ~ - ~ W 1 I ~ , j, ^ ).i
1 ~ A ~Qcr
v • I ~,r ' ~ I ~ - J
I I ~ ~I~►, CC . . ~ ,
. e ...1
(D 0;C3 k ~
(
SlTE PIAN
.
~r. ; . ~ OF RECORD
TABLE A
• ,r ,
'.xis4n6Zoning l~E~•.{.J ...~...~.y' y/1V•,~'~CY'r tt• •1 ~
'roposed Zoninb {ZR•IU INLAND ASPHA►LT
Coul Atcu Approx. 5.5 acres LANDFILL - SITE lvlti.C
3uilding Covenge Appn►x. 60 sy. I't
QuilCing Sntbxcks SO ►ect frtim pr«prny NOT TO SCALE PAGE l OF 4
rypC tll LYfl(J!iC11pIflb fiximinl: I'cr1mr1ri `rrrrnin~; SEC. 33, TWN.15, R. 44EWM SPOKANE, COUNIY D
s• . .
Lri
~
N
~
t0
0)
m
~
~
0)
PROPCRir OESCRiP'ipN
~ +bl~ofIM1~0H11MY1/4~w.1wl1
~ t! w, 0 w t0 r,, y~1 1~i~.M~v ~ P. Ay,i f ~w i i.
wr+'~ .r w. ~w..~ c
~ \ , ~r ov~ M..1 .d w.+pNw t
O . M/MM~ M IN frNr d yew1b1~ M M~ylr
o
A' A Noto. Sa attachai OperationslMaintenance Plan m k,'~ and Rxlamation Plan
j
,
f-)
~h.l 4~ fl \ M1'. ♦
~ °
m
~ ww wi m ~m,
.l; ~
Q1 °
< ' ~ 1 + ` ~ o,
~f.` ~ \ ~ ~ _ ~ •t
, CC~,\,
s t
N~,:
~ ~ .►~w . ' '
~ - 44TH A,ENUE SITE PLAN
, -
OF RECORD ,
a
~ INLAND ASPHALT
ca ,
LANDFTLL - EXISTING CONTOURS '
cn
NOT TO SCALE PAGE 2 OF 4
SEC. 33t'iyVN. 25, R 44EWM SPOKANE, COUNTY
-7 T
.
i
Ln
~
N
~
~ .
Q~
Z
m
(A paoptpn ascntP,qN
rt
iMIM1MdMR+i~.6 itin1 hrwxVs +Sou.U
~ 1, If M.. OL w LIY. M7 I~uvdw+r M "v Aei M" 1 M
h0.9".0- M 11M. iq►~M (A.-WM N M-w1 d Mv i J
w w o.q~ t+w .w w+Mw a.~r
r fwO. . iH orq Of w.w. ua vuwrMr+
m
C+ I t
Note: Sec attached Operation5lMaintenance P{an
°
-1 and Rxlamation Plan
N
~
m
i
''d I~ I r
Cn
m
i I ~ - ►
~ ~ '
tC o I~ t`~'~~; ~ 1 p
m ws wua. tmi
I ~ ~ ~
~ .
vr-
W ~
Ch z
~v' `d"' V
?HASE I - E51. rEAR 2002 COMPLETIQN
:•~i i'`ILL TO APPROxIAIATE ELEVATION OF 1490-2000)
' ~`1
, ,
. \ t'`~\ `
\ 7 l
~ ~ y~~'~ •
44TN AIIEMUE 000 R,rori,aoW~. `l,~ ,
~ - - S1TE PlAN
Of P,ECG?D
,
~ INLAND ASPHALT
a
° LAIVDFILL - RECLAMATTON 1996 - 2002.
~ NOT TO SCALE PAGE 3 OF 4 ,
SEC. 33,'iyVN. 25, R. 44EWM SPOKAIVE, COUNTY
7 G-I2 .At.
~
~ pppF(prr p[StRtPnON
F~+
r v es bo s+!M ~.y ~ ~ i w
~rN3:
IlY. Wh Mdb~M7
H~ M/Wq1! W MM gA*1 EMo'T W Mf rrl I w~ ~
\ 1~ IM OiM' MrW N MNIMr' 9--o-I/
Z ~ r awu ► nr c«M of s.«a 1%100 r+W++MM
m
w r, ~
n Notc: Sa attached OpcrationsiMaintenance Plan
- ~
and Reclamatian Plan
ra
~
o .
~ .
o
~ PHaSE Iv
~ (APPROx, 2005-2007)
' ~ .
F+ • 4 ~ ,
W `
,
~ .
C ~ Yw[ IGaI M rtf~l
m ~ 'r~- T
~ ~ '
. r
x \ C..$., ~4o.0
~ N
~ PHASE III
m s~ (APPRD%, 20 - OS)
A ~ `
a% ~
~ PHASE 11
I (APPRO?f. 2 01 - 20
k $ru,e.' am JITE KAN
4ITN A NU ~ roa +ravwI• aoxe , r1
~ _ ~E GF il E CCO
INLAND ASPHALT .
a
t°
m LANDFILL - RECLAMATTON 2002 - 2007
ao NOT TO SCALE PAGE 4 OF 4.
SEC, 33, TWN. 25, R. 44EWM SPOKANET COUNTY ,
C.•~ `
' .v
0
BUILDING AND PLANNING DIVISION REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DATE: MAY 1, 1996
SUBJECT: ZE-13-95, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN
RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO RURAL RESIDENTIAL-
10 (RR-10), WITH CUE-1-96 CONDITIQNAL USE
PERMIT AND VE-4-96 VARIANCE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Inland Asphalt Company
Jana McDonald
5111 East Broadway
Spokane, WA 99212 (509) 534-6221
Contact Planner: Steve Davenport
Location: Generally located north of 44th Avenue, east of and adjacent to Sands
Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
Counry, Washington.
Proposal: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Rural
Residential-10 (R.R-10), and a Conditional Use Pernut for an inert and demolition
landfill and a Variance from the 10 acre minimum lot size requirement specified by
Section 14.606.240 11(a) of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
II. SITE INFORMATIQN
A. Site Size: Approximately 5.5 acres.
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan: The proposal is in the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan which does not specifically address the compatibility
of landfills. Mining activities are, however considered as noncompatible
uses. Within (Section 10), Water Quality, of the Comprehensive Plan;
Objective 10.1.21 states that, "New solid waste disposal sites (landfills)
should be prohibited within the aquifer sensitive area." While the proposed
landfill may appear to be inconsistent with this policy, the landfill may be
appropriate considering the inert nature of the landfill material and given the
history of the site as a surface mine (see also administrative interpretation
(Attachment A). Also to be considered is the potential for subsequent
5- l-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 9
reclamation of the site, which would create a site more amenable to Urban
type uses.
2. Arterial Road Plan: Sands Road is designated as Minor Arterials on the
Spokane County Arterial Road Plan with a future right of way of 80 feet.
In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan the County Engineer has
recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width along the Sands Road
frontage be set aside in reserve as a future acquisition area. This property
may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
improvements are made to Sands Road.
C. Site Characteristics: The site is an abandoned gravel pit covering
approximately 5.5 acres. The sides of the pit slope steeply to a depth of the pit
ranging from 50 to 65 feet below grade. A below grade spring was observed
discharging water to the pit and standing water was evidenced in the bottom of the
pit. The site is bounded to the north and east by a railroad track and to the west
by Sands road. The subject pit is contiguous with the grade of a gravel pit to the
south which is currently being utilized as a demolition landfill, known as the
Chester Landfill (CUS-30-95, VS-52-89).
D . Zoning Analysis:
Proposal: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
zoned Agricultural (A) (ZE-12-67).
North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
zoned Agricultural (A) (ZE-12-67).
South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
zoned Agricultural (A) (ZE-12-67).
East: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
zoned Agricultural (A) (ZE-12-67).
West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
zoned Agricultural (A) (ZE-12-67).
The proposal is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. A written
interpretation of the Zoning Code (AIN-2-96) relative to the siting of landfills
within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone was issued on March 6,
1996 at the request of the applicant. The interpretation is included with this report
as attachment "A".
E. Conditional Use Permit
The proposed landfill is not a permitted use in the proposed Rura1 Residential-10
(RR-10) zone but is allowed as a conditional use subject to mitigating conditions
and performance standards as necessary to make it compatible with adjacent uses.
The intent of the Conditional Use Permit is explained in Section 14.404.101 of
the Zoning Code:
The intent of the conditional use procedure is to establish criteria
for determining the conditions under which a use(s) may be
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96NE-4-96 Page 10
, •
I J
permitted outright in the zone. A conditional use is subject to
specific review during which additional conditions may be
imposed to assure compatibility of the use with other uses in the
zone. A request for a conditional use may be denied where it
cannot be shown that the requested use will be compatible with
other pernutted uses in the zone involved.
Conditions and Reauirements
The following is a list of the conditions and requirements that pertain to a conditional
use as identified in Section 14.404.102 of the Zoning Code.
1. In approving a conditional use permit, the Hearing Body may stipulate restrictions
and conditions, including but not limited to the following:
a. Control of use;
b. Provision for front, side, or rear setbacks greater than the minimum standards
of the zone within which the property is located;
c. Special landscaping, screening, fencing, signing, off-street parking, public
transit andlor high occupancy vehicle facilities or any other general '
development standards;
d. Requiring street dedications and/or roadway and drainage improvements
necessary as a result of the proposed use;
e. Control of points of vehicular ingress and egress;
f. Control of noise, vibration, odor, glare, and other environmental
contaminants;
g. Control of operating hours;
h. Duration or time limitations for certain activities; and/or
i Any other reasonable restrictions, conditions, or safeguards that will uphold
the spirit and intent of this Code and the Comprehensive Plan and mitigate any
adverse impact upon the adj acent properties by reason of use, extension,
construction, or alteration allowed.
2. The Hearing Body shall make available to all parties of record its decision, along
with findings of fact. The action of the Hearing Body on a conditional use shall be
considered final and conclusive unless an appeal is filed with the appropriate body
under procedures set forth in Section 14.412.042; and
3. A conditional use permit may be suspended or revoked if, after public hearing with
notice as provided in Section 14.404.060, the Hearing Body finds that a grantee or
their successors in interest fail to comply with conditions or restrictions included in
the permit.
Response: Based on the conditions and requirements provided for above, the
Hearing Examiner may impose conditions on the proposal which would be more
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-13-96/CLTE-1-96/VE-4-96 Page 11
stringent than the existing development standards. The applicant has provided an
operation/management and reclamation plan to mitigate the proposals impacts.
These plans are included as part of this report as attachment "B" for the written
plan, and as the site plan of record.
In addition to the above provisions, a Conditional Use Permit for a landfill in the
Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone is required under Section 14.606.240(1 1) to
comply with the following special standards.
a. Minimum lot area is ten (10) acres.
Response: The site does not meet the minimum standard. The applicant has
applied for a variance to this standard. See Section F of the staff report for
analysis of the variance.
b. Minimum distance for disposal operations from closest existing residence, at
time of conditional use pernut approval, shall be three hundred (300) feet
unless residents therein sign a waiver, with a minimum of one hundred fifty
(150) feet of this distance being on the landfill site;
Respotzse: The staging area for disposal operations is over 300 feet from the
nearest residence based on Spokane County Engineers aerial photographs. It
should be noted that a commercial daycare faciliry is located in a former residence
within the 300 foot boundary.
c. All necessary buildings and structures shall comply with minimum setback
standards of the zone;
Response: Any buildings located on site will require compliance with setback
standards at time of building permit review.
d. The site shall be rehabilitated to elevations contained in a site reclamation plan
after disposal terminates; and
Response: The applicant has submitted a reclamation plan which is
incorporated as a part of this proposal.
e. All local, state and federal regulations shall be met at establishment time and
continue to be met during operation or the site shall be closed and conditional
use permit revoked.
Response: The landfill operation is required to comply with regulations listed
above.
F. Variance Analysis:
The applicant is seeking a variance to Section 14.606.240(11)[a] of the Spokane
County Zoning Code which requires a minimum lot area of ten acres for a landfill
within the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone. The site size is approximately 5.5 acres.
In order to be approved, a variance must comply with the conditions and
requirements specified by Section 14.404.082 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Spokane
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 12
County Zoning Code. The following will analyze how the proposed variance
complies with the above-cited conditions and requirements.
Section 14.404.082 1
Any vaziance from the terms of the Zoning Code shall be subject to such conditions
as will (a) ensure that the adjustment shall not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and similar
zone classification in which the property is situated, (b) ensure that the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Code is maintained with regard to location, site design,
appearance, landscaping and other features of the proposal, and (c) protect the
environment, public interest and general welfare, and that the following
circumstances are found to apply:
a. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the
Zoning Code creates practical difficulties and is found to deprive the property
of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and similar
zone classification; and
b. That the granting of the variance will neither be materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. .
Resporase I a. The applicant has demonstrated special circumstances
applicable to the subject property. The site is an unused, subgrade mining pit with
very steep sides and with the exception of the contiguous pit to the south it is a
unique geomorphologic form in the area. Without filling and reclamation of the
site, the site can not be utilized in a manner similar to other properties in the
vicinity.
Response 1 b. The granting of the variance, considering the conditional use
and other permits, will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor
injurious to thE propErty or improvements.
Section 14.404.082 2
The following, while not to be considered as sole substantiation, shall be
• considered in the granting of a variance:
a. Strict application of the Zoning Code standard(s) creates an unreasonable
burden in light of the purpose to be served by this Code;
Response 2 a. Strict application of the Zoning Code, specifically Section
14.606.240(11) [a] does create an unreasonable burden on the applicant. Without
approval of the variance, filling and reclamation of the site could not be
accomplished. Denial of the variance would preclude reasonable use of the site
because the site could not be reclaimed to an at grade condition for alternative uses.
b. Relaxation of the Zoning Code standards will allow a more environmentally
sensitive, energy conserving design or result in the adaptive reuse of an
historic property; or
Response 2 b. Not applicable
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE-13-96/CUE-1-96/VE-4-96 Page 13
c. A broader public or community need or interest will be served by granting the
variance as opposed to denying the application.
Response 2 c. The broader public interest will be served by granting the
variance. The reclamation of the site will allow for uses more consistent with the
Urban category of the Comprehensive plan and will eliminate the current hazards
associated with the site.
Section 14.404.082 3 The granting of a variance generally should not:
a. Be substantially based upon precedent established by illegal or
nonconfomung circumstances;
Response 3a. From a site inspection it appears that no illegal dumping or
filling has occurred on the site. Past mining activities may or may not have been
legally established; however, surface mining has been conducted as far back as
1950, based on aerial photographs of the site.
b. Establish a precedent which will adversely affect the zoning concept for an
area or the County as a whole;
Response 3b. Due to the unique nature of the site as a subgrade mining pit,
it would not create a precedent for the area to allow other variances or additional
inert/demolition landfills. Additionally, it is unlikely that adjacent landowners
would desire to rezone their property from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Rural Residential-10 (RR-10).
c. Be substantially based upon a lack of reasonable economic return or a claim
that the existing structure is too small;
Response 3c. Not applicable.
d. Be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of Spokane County's
Comprehensive Plan;
Response 3d. Reclamation of the site to grade would allow for uses more
consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan.
e. Be denied because the properiy, at the time of acquisition, was characterized
by the practical difficulties giving rise to the request for a variance;
Response 3e. The property was characterized by the practical difficulties,
i.e. 5.5 acre mining pit, at the time of acquisition.
f. Result in a de facto zone reclassification; or
Response 3f. A landfill is permitted as a conditional use in the proposed
Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone. The variance is for a dimensional standard
. only.
g. Be substantially for the purpose of circumventing density regulations
designed to protect groundwater.
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 14
1 .i
Response 3g. Not applicable
Variance Conclusion and Recommendation
The criteria for approval of a variance as specified by Section 14.404.082 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code supports the proposed request. Staff has reviewed
the variance request in accordance with the criteria specified by the Spokane County
Zoning Code and finds that the proposal does satisfy these criteria. Therefore, the
staff recommends approval of the variance request.
G. Land Use Analysis:
Site: Sand and gravel mining pit.
North: Railroad txacks.
South: Inert demolition landfill.
East: Railroad tracks.
West: Commercial day care faciliry and cemetery. H. Circulation: Access to the site will be provided by Sands Road which is a
county maintained road.
I. Design: The proposed site plan illustrates staging areas for disposal operations
at the north end of the site and at the south end of the site adjacent to 44th
Avenue. The written operation and reclamation plan (attachment "B as well as
the site plans of record provide further detail of the landfill and reclamation
proposal.
J. Water Supply: Water is provided by Spokane Water District # 3. Appropriate
provisions for connection to a public water system will be required prior to the
issuance of building permits for new construction. Approval by the Washington
State Boundary Review Board may be necessary prior to extension of water to the
site.
K. Sewage Disposal: The Spokane County Health District may a11ow the use of
portable toilets or on-site septic tanks and drainfields.
L. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District
and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve
fire protection provisions prior to issuance of building permits.
M. Critical Areas: None identified.
N. Floodplain: The proposal is partially within the 100 year floodplain. A
floodplain development permit is required prior to any development.
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 15
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
Spokane Counry Division of Building and Planning. The review considered the
specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other
regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized
Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning has determ.ined that "No probable
significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has
issued a Determination of Nonsit2nificance ("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 17 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment.
The "DNS" comment period ends April, 29 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the
public hearing.
IV. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed zone reclassification, conditional use and variance is generally
consistent with the Spokane County Zoning Code and the Goals, Objectives and
Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Compreher►sive Plan. The
Division of Building and Planning recommend approval, as conditioned.
V . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding
on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the ownet• or
owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
i i. The zone reclassification, conditional use permit and variance
applies to the following real property:
That portion of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 33, T 25N, R
44EWM, lying SW of the right of way conveyed to the Washington and Idaho
Railroad Co.,. and the Right of way conveyed to the Oregon Railroad and
Navigation Company.
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Rural Residential-10 (RR-10) zone, as amended.
2. This permit expires on June 1, 1999, (or a date established by the Hearing Examiner)
unless renewed under the following terms:
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 16
• ' J.
a. A renewal request shall be submitted by May l, 1999 accompanied by the
appropriate fee. Any advertising costs associated with renewals shall be at the expense
of the applicant
b. The renewal may be administrative unless the Division of Building and Planning
determines a public hearing review by the appropriate Hearing Body is necessary. The
renewal shall be subject to review by all agencies originally involved. All regulating
agencies may impose new conditions of approval consistent with any new federal, state
or local regulations. This is to say, this project does not have grandfather rights with
respect to conditions of approval which may be outdated or outmoded by contemporary
changes in the law. This recognizes that the landfill operation may have to cease for
economic reasons or regulatory reasons at the time of any given renewal. Some
agencies may wish to impose new conditions at any time and nothing in this permit's
intent would prohibit the same. Agency regulations may even force this operation to be
either a demolition waste or an inert waste disposal site.
3. Any change to the approved operation/management and/or reclamation plan sha11 be
subject to either a public hearing or an administrative decision with notice given to
property owners within 400 feet of the total underlying ownership, with a right to
appeal clearly spelled out in the notice.
4. If the Division of Building and Planning finds violations sufficient to warrant
reevaluation of the conditional use permit, this permit may be suspended or revoked
pursuant to Section 14.404.103.3 of the Zoning Code.
5. At any time during the life of the landfill new regulations are adopted by federal, state
or local agencies which effect the operation, the operation must begin immediate
compliance with those regulations. It is the intent of the cond.itional use pernut to not
allow operations, practices or procedures which would not be allowed by a new
operation at any given time.
6. Spreading of top soil and seeding shall occur as any portion of the fill reaches finished
grade, consistent with the approved reclamation plan.
7. The proposal shall comply with the approved operation/maintenance and reclamation
plans as modified by the conditions of approval.
8. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
Counry Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety
of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Tit1e
Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property
in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed
for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building
and Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a
land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative
Official on [ imposing a variety of special development
conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in
the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning.
5-1-96 HE Staff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 17
9. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor,
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition,
including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as
follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the
property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the
provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is
more particularly described as follows:
10. The Spokane Counry Planning Department sha11 prepare and record with the
County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road
right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be
released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be
recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 10 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities, in addition to the existang and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along
Sands Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning
Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs
should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they
shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are
made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered interim uses.
e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim"
improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements
after acquiring said future acquisition area.
See attached comments and conditions submitted from interested agencies.
5-1-96 HE S taff Report for ZE- 13-96/CUE- 1-96/VE-4-96 Page 18
~s ' ~C.~V''~C►`.' 1 `~/f
_ .
S P O K A N E O U N T Y
. ,
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
March 6, 1996
Inland Asphalt Company
Jana McDonald
5111 E. Broadway
PO Box 3366
Spokane, WA 99220
SUBJECT: File No. AIN-2-96
Written interpretation of the Spokane County Zoning Code to determine if an
inertJdemolition landfill is considered a sanitary landfill under Section
14.706.140 of the Zoning Code.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Chapter 14.504.000 of the Zoning Code, Ms. McDonald has by
letter requested a written interpretation as to the meaning, intent, or proper
general applications of the provisions of the Zoning Code.
ISSUE: Inland Asphalt Company is the owner of a surface mining pit generally
located north of 44th Avenue, and east of and adjacent to Sands Road in the
SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM (parcel #
45334.9055). Inland Asphalt desires to utilize the pit as an inert/demolition
landfill, and prior to pursuing zoning approvals and other necessaiy permits,
they are requesting an interpretation of the Zoning Code to deteimine if the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Aquifer Sensitive Area
(ASA) overlay zone, specifically Section 14.706.140 dealing with solid waste
disposal.
Section 14.706.140 is titled, Solid Waste and Septic Tank Sludae Disposal
Within the Aauifer Sensitive Area. and states in part as follows, "No new
sanitary landfill shall be allowed within the Aquifer Sensitive Area.
Based on this Section, the question presented by Ms. McDonald is whether an
inert/demolition landfill is considered a sanitary landfill. If an inei-t/demolition
landfill is considered a sanitary landfill, it would be prohibited wilhin the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone.
RESPONSE: The Division of Building and Planning finds that an inert/demolition landfill is
not a sanitary landfill as used and defined in Section 14.706.140 of the
Zoning Code. '
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
BuILDUVG PHO1vE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
P[.AtvtvtrlG PHOt1E: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243
Tf\r\ /P'-- \ nn • -I /
' • . ~ • , '
. ' • ,
Ms. Jana McDonald
March 6, 1996
Page 2
JUSTIFICATION: The above response is justified based on the ambiguity of the term sanitary
landfill and in light of the fact that since the adoption of the Zoning Code,
more defined categorization of differing types of landfills has evolved.
Additionally, the original intent of Section 14.706.140 of the Zoning Code
was directed at landfills that accepted putrescible or other potentiaily
hazardous wastes and was not intended to apply to inertldemolition landfills.
A more detailed discussion of the deternunation is as follows:
The term sanitary landfill is unclear and ambiguous as used in the Zoning
Code. While the terms landfill and solid waste are defined in the Code, the
term sanitary landfill is not defined. Following are the definitions from the
Zoning Code for landfill and solid waste.
Landfill: A method of final disposal of solid waste by utilizing land
in a manner that allows the disposal of solid waste without creating
hazards to the public health, significant impacts to the environment ,
or nuisances.
Solid Waste: All putrescible and nonputrescible solid and semisolid
material, including, but not limited to, garbage, refuse, bulky wastes,
inert waste, agricultural solid wasce, sewage sludge and demolition
and construction wastes.
While the above terms are clearly defined in the code, the term sanitary landfill
is not defined, thus requiring reference to Webster's New Collegiate
Dictionary to deterniine a specific definition { Section 14.300.000(2) of the
Zoning Code). In Webster's, ]andfill and sanitary landfill are defined as
follows, 1: a system of trash and garbage disposal in which the waste is
buried between layers of earth to build up low-lying land - called also sanitary
landfill." This definition does not clearly differentiate between
inert/demolition waste and other types of solid waste. The definition is likely
based on historical practices where almost all wastes, regardless of potential
environmental impacts, were disposed of in a common landfill. Current
practice provides for differing means of disposal for the -various types of solid
waste. In terms of this interpretation, the term sanitary landfill is outdated and
does not provide clear direction concerning the appropriateness of an
inert/demolition landfill within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay
zone.
The determination to not consider an inert/demolition landfill as a sanitary
landfill is supported by legislative history. Legislative history may provide
guidance, in instances where a statute is ambiguous, City of Edmunds v.
Washingtoii State Bldg. Code Council„ 18 F.3d 802, certiorari granted 115
S.Ct. 417 (1994). Stan Miller, Water Quality Program Manager for Spokane
County, has indicated that the intent of Section 14.706.140 of the Zoning
Code was directed at landfills that accepted putrescible or other potentially
hazardous wastes. He also indicated that the term sanitary landfill was not
intended to apply to inert/demolition landfills as defined in Chapter 173-304
of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). Mr. Miller was involved in
the both the policies leading to and the language developed for the Aquifer
Sensitive Overlay Area (ASA) Zone (Chapter 14.706) of the Zoning Code, to
which this interpretation relates.
o G 3
• .a~• , • ~
a.
e
Ms. Jana McDonald
March 6, 1996
Page 3
APPEAL RIGHTS: This is an Administrative Interpretation of the Spokane County Zoning Code
pursuant to Section 14.504.000. As such it is required to be sent to the
applicant as well as adjacent property ownersltaxpayers and is appealable
under the provisions of Section 14.412.041. As stated therein, „such request
shall contain reference to the specific decision or interpretation contested and
shall be delivered to the Hearing Body at the Division of Building and
Planning office not later than 20 calendar days from the date of the written
decision of the Department." The fee for such appeal is $225.
Sincerely
5 Davenport,
Planner II
cc: John Mercer
John Pederson
Rob Binger
Stan Miller
3 3
. • ; , ~ .
.
- RECEIVED
/aT; Ac~{~7 PACTE 5POKAtVE COUNTY
~
MAR 0 1 1996
INLAND ASPHALT LANDFILL
OPERATIONS/MANAGEMENT PLAN DIViSiON OF BUILDINO ANp pI,qNNING
8Y:
Inland Asphalt Landfill shall be operated in accordance with all local, state, and federal
regulations for the operation of Inen Landf'ills.
1. Days of Operation; Monday through Friday.
2. Hours of Operation: 8:00 A.M. to S:UO P.M.
. 3. Sweeping of Roads: Access roads will be monitored for tracking of dirt and
mud. The road will be swept as needed or flushed
with a water truck.
4. Noise Control: All equipment will be operated only during the regular
hours of ogeration - weekdays 8:00 A.M. to 5:40 P.M.
All equipment will be properly maintained to adhere to all
noise regulations.
5. Dust Control: Eatrance to the active dumping area will be
treated with oil or dust palliative to prevent dust. Water will
be used to control dust for dumping activities. Customers
with very dry loads will be asked to water loads at the source.
6. Dump Procedures: Loads to be inspected upon entry for allowable materials
and dust. Water will be applied as necessary. Trucks
will then proceed to active dumping area.
7.' Material Accepted: The following materials wi11 be accepted if approved by
Spokane County Health District: concrete, asphalt,
clean fill dirt, glass, and bricks.
. 8. Water and Sewer: Water will be supplied from Water District #3 a.nd a
portable toilet will serve the site.
9. Reclamation: See attached reclamation plans.
. r ~Z
. . k
• • J
A TfiA~~l~1.t~T PAyf£1
INLAND ASPHALT LANDFILL
RECLAMATION PLAN
(Also see attached written operation plan)
It is estimated that it will take approximately 380,000 cubic yards of material to fill the
site. The site will be reclaimed in a manner similar to the following description:
1. The bottom portion of the site will be fi.lled first to an approxi.mate elevation
of 1995-2000. (Phase I - 1996-2012)
2. After a level floor has been established, fill will then start to be sloped to
achieve the final plan. (See Phase II, III, IV - 2012-2017)
3. The site wiU be covered with approximately 3-6 inches of topsoil. Clean fi11
material that is brought to the site and is adequate for topsoil will be set
aside and used as such.
4. After topsoil has been applied, it will be catwalked and then seeded. The
catwalked slopes will protect the seed from stormwater and erosion
control.
5. The following seed mixture (or similar) will be used to seed the site. It will
be applied at approx. 50 pounds per acre.
30 % Wheatgrass **Please note that there are many varieties
30 % Ryegrass of each of these grasses and the most
30 % Fescue suitable for the site will be used.
10 °lo Lupine
2 v~ Z
• . .
,i" ~ ` •
/
. a -SPOKANE COUNtY C1 CLEt,Ii~~~e AIR p AIR POLlUTION
o K,.. N E CONTROL AUTHORITY
WEST 1101 COLLEGE, SUITE 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 •(509) 4564727 Fax (509) 459-6828
Date: April 10, 1996
To: Steve Davenport Spokane County Division of Bui{ding & Planning
From: Mabel Caine
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Subject: SCAPCA COMMENTS REGARDING : File No. ZE-13-96/CUE-1-96NE-4-96
Inland Asnhalt Co: inert and demolition landfill near 44th & Sands Rd.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the environmental documents submitted to our
office. Following is a list of concerns/issues that, at a minimum, need to be addressed for this
project. SCAPCA encourages proponents to contact their offices at 1101 West College,
Spokane, WA 99201 for additional information.
~ All air pollution regulations must be met.
Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and
excavation projects be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roatis should
be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well
as emissions from all other construction related activities.
~ SCAPCA strongly recommends that all travelled surfaces ti.e., ingress, egress, parking
areas be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. Travelled surfaces/access
roads within the proposed "pit" shoL-ld be treated with a dust palliative at intervals
frequent enough to control dust emissions. During unloading, transfer of material and
other activities , measures must be implemented to control dust emissions.
~ Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces
onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be
taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
* Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., construction waste, garbage, office waste, etc...).
Failure to meet SCAPCA regulations may result in delays, closure and civil and/or criminal
sanctions.
4L es Pnnted on Recyded Pa,vr
'
RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY HE'ALTH DISTRIL f
SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 'DIVISION
APR 12 1996 Inter-office Communication
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DATE: April 11, 1996
BY:
TO: ` teve Davenport, Planner II, Spokane County Building and Planning Division
, '
FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SCHD ,
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change, Variance, and Conditional Use Permit: ZE-13-96/VE-4-96/CUE-1-96 (Inland
Asphalt)
1. References:
a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 50', by Applicant, undated, received by this office Apri18, 1996.
b) Reconnaissance Geoloeic Map of the West Half of the Snokane Ouadraniale, Washington and Idaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survev, Spokane Countv, Washinaton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Spokane Countv, Washinizton, Enizineeriniz Intemretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e) Snokane Countv Rules and Reiaulations for Sewaize Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 24, 25N, Sections 4, 28, 32, 33, and 34.
g) Map: Freeman Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Spokane
County Water District #3. Water supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Axea, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lot is of the
proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system.
d) The project lies in a relatively gentle to steep sloping area east of Sands Road and north of 44`hAvenue.
Local drainageways are significant.
Proposed Zone Change, Variance, and Conditional U--.- Perniit: ZE-13-96NE-4-96/CUE-1-96 (Inland flsphalt)
Page 2 . e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as marble loamy sand, marble sandy
loam with 0% to 30% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also
possible contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are
from 130' to 260' deep and have static water levels varying from 32' to 165' below the surface. The
Spokane County Water District #3 has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent.
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of a
portable toilet may be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
b) A solid waste disposal site and facility permit will be required for the operation of the landfill.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: Jana McDonald
Inland Asphalt Company
5111 E. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99212
landuse, Itrlinlandasphalt/2/mhv
~
,
To: STEVE DAVENPORT, Spokane County Planning Department - Hearing Examiner Committee
From: Spokane County Utilities
Date: 4/23/96
Subject Conditions of Approval
Planning Action Number: ZE-13-96 Type of Action: ZR Inland Asphalt Zone Reclass
Applicant: Inland Asphalt Company (Jana McDon Legal Owner: Inland Asphalt Company (Jana McDonald)
5111 E. Broadway 5111 E. Broadway
Spokane WA 99212 Spokane WA 99212
Sewer Service:
SS04 / A Covenant Agreement shall be signed stating: The Owner(s) or
Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the
formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the
Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a
ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) properiy.
PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the
formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94.
(A covenant agreement shall be signed stating:)
Water Service:
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
.
, OFFICE OF TNF SPOKANECOUN7'Y ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, Wr 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- g:pZ~4i`lE -
TO: Spokane County Flanning nepartment, Sreve Davenport
FROM: Division of Fngineerinq k Roads, Scott Fngel,har.d ;5
Dn'tE : Apr.a 1 3.7, 1996
'UBJECT : ZE-13 - 96 / INLAND ASFHIILT
Che followa.ng "Conditions of AFproval" for the above refPrenced zone change
ire submitted to the Spokane Counr.y Hearing Fr,aminer for inclusion i.n the
'Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" of the public hearing schedul.ed
tay ,1, 1996.
rior to releaee of n building permit or use of pzoperty ae proposed:
40 Access pezmits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
C:,unty Engineer.
43 Applicant shall submit for approval hy the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
51 All required improvements shall conform to the ciizrent State of Washington Standazd `
Specificatians for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards
and/or adopted resolutions pertai.ning ta Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of constzuction, unless otherwiae approved by the County Engineer.
35 Roadway standards, typical roadway qecti.ons and drainage plan requirementa are found
in Spokane Boaxd of County Commi.GSioners XF'90111tj.011 95-0498 as amended and are
applicable to this proposal.
;7 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the
proposed develvpment is affected by a flood hazard zone. A development permi,t shall
be obtained fzom the County EnginPer before constriiction or development begins within
any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 88-0521)
e No construction work ie to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way
until a permit ha9 been issued by the County Engineer. T►l1 work within the public road
right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Enqineer.
1 The County 7lrterial Road plan identifies Sands Roaci as a BO foot Minor Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 50 feet is not consistent with that apecified in The
Plan. In order to implement the Jlrterial Road Plan it, is recommended a strip of
property 10 Eeet in width along the Sands Road £rontage be set aside in reserve. This
property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when nrterial Imgrovements are
made to Sands Road.
3 The applicant should be advised r.hat there may exist utilities either underground or
• overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set
aside futuze acquisition. Spokane County will aqaume no financial obligation for
adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant
or utility is responsible for adjustment or relacat-ion costs and to make arrangements
for any necessary work.
?CIAL CONDITION: The County Engineer has prescribed a 1.5 inch asphalt overlay for Sands
Road prior to operation of the ].andf.fll. The overlay shall extend from Diahman Mica
Road to 44th Avenue.
:CIAL CQNDITION: Trucks hauling to the site shall not use 44th Avenue or Sands Road to back
up and acceas the site.
PHONE (509) 534-2657 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION #IN-LA-NA-'304K5
FAX (509) 534-9787
~0~~pf--- Inland Asphalt Company SINCE 1934
0~ • ~ `O1 ' •
5111 E BROADWAY • P.O. BOX 3366 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3366 6j /MlY\April 30, 1996
Steve Davenport
Spokane County Planning Dept
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
Re: ZE-13-96
Chester Landfill
Dear Mr. Davenport:
The intent of this correspondence is to formally assert opposition to the County
Engineer's "Conditions of Approval" asking for a 1 1/2" overlay on Sands Road
' from Dishman-Mica Road to 44th Avenue prior to operation of our proposed
Chester Landfill.
The main focus for our objection is that the adjacent Chester Landfill has
accepted an average of 45,935 cy of material for each of the past five years.
Projections of landfill material at our site is only 10,000 to 20,000 cubic yards per
year. With the existing landfill's volume being 2 1/2 to 4 1/2 times greater than
our projections, the County Engineers seemed to have ignored the existing
landfill's impact on Sands Road in the past and are trying to force the "new" low
volume player to pay for all past road deterioration on Sands Road. Their stance
is difficult for us to accept; especially when we haven't even started any landfill
operations at the site but just happen to be in the paving business, unlike the
adjacent landfill owners.
We have tried recently to negotiate with the Engineer's office by attempting to
provide a"haul road" agreement, where we would accept responsibility for future
pavement distress on Sands Road attributable to only our operation. Their
negative response to this is also difficult to accept. We still remain open to
provide a haul road agreement.
- continued -
,
11 EXH~B~T ~
Z~ ~3
~
~
An Equa! Opportunity Employer
April 30, 1996
Page two
Re: AE-13-96
Chester Landfill .
- continued -
One last objection stems from past meetings with the Engineer's office where we
were informed that any conditional overlay would only be required to the
entrance of our property. The special conditions actually used by the Engineers
in their "Conditions of Approval" requires the overlay to proceed past our
entrance to the entrance of the existing landfill on 44th Avenue. This condition
that encompasses overlaying a large portion of Sands Road that will not be used
by us in our proposed operations seems to reinforce our feelings that the
requested overlay is a roadway maintenance issue from past landfill activities
and roadway deterioration.
Our present request to re-zone our property to accept landfill is worthwhile and
has no impact, at this time, on Sands Road or a need of an overlay.
Sincerely,
INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY
-
R E Wild, P E
General Manager
REW/su
c: Mike Murphy
Jana McDonald
SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS
CALCULATION SHEET
Description: ~ • ~ Project No.:
Calc. by: rc.c- Date: Title:
Checked by : Date : Sheet 1. of
Notes :
,
4 ~
`CJ i ~a 1 ~ rlrovict-pl
~1~.~ ► ~ ~t-~~ ,5
~
r ~
~
13
~
- . ~ .
~ - - ~ : ~ _ - ; - - . ` I°) j~ - ~ -
. .
4z2 ~ .
L 1- 1
r< 4:: > r2p~._ Q~ ~0.~.., . • ~ ~ . ~ . , - -
; _ , . ; _ ; . . . . . . . . . . _ . - - - , - .
C?QCz 21eo:l z . . ~ , '3041
. . d 2. (o 9
~.Q2
J'7, O;i'Z. . l .q
Y ~ ~2 .14111 , _ I.L:C~ I, 19 ,
~
U!'i~.. C rJ
- - - .q t I ,2l I ~A 9. cl-?
. . . ~Q - ~ ~ 1,~~ , 2~► ~ f~ ~ I , a , ~j. :
' ' ; ~ ,a " ~ ' _ ~ ; ' ' ' ~ "t' . _ ; ; . ~ . • ' " ~ . _ i' ~
:e.
- - --~--•----+---~v-- t ; . ; . - ~ ; -
~ _ , . - - - - • - _ , . _ _ _ ~ _ . - ~ • - ~ - - - - - - . ~ _ . _
! • -1 ! ~.~t:_... .~~i--+---t---*-- • ~ : --%._____--~---4 ~ - ! _ s: _ ~ i ~ ~ - . + _ ~ Mr
1 ~ + ~ ~ A ~ • _ I _ ~ - ~ - ! - ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ - v- - - -r~---•~---~---^- .,r _ ~ _ - i : . < < _r_.~_ e _i i ~ ,
'
SPOKANE COUNTY OFFiCE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS
CALCULATION SHEET
~
,
Description: ~ ►~r`~'~ IRA . ~ Project No.:
Colc. by: C.a--C , Date: Title:
Checked by : Date : Sheet 1 of
Notes :
~
1 aA mcx, ~ l p~r~c.~ I~. `~f"~1\ S
Vo Lkove,
~
Q I
,
1 1
~
o,Q Ce 21 ro.l a
10) Crl,7 (v 9
` !74440 1 : 29
_ .l . 2 . 0,aq 1710 l'Z
. ~ "2 1, I 9
, ,2 O, l9 _
1 ~ o7
. o
~ - - - - - - . , - ~ - - - - r - ~ , . _ ~ _
_ ~ - . . . ' . ' ' ~ - , ~ i
. . - - - ~ • • i- ~ -i._ . , . . -t ~ ~
_ i-_...i_~i~_-.,-~.~_ --t---r---} ~ ~ b ----,~----i--- ba___9.__.._ ' . - ~ ~
~ - - ~ -ih~ ~ t - -r + . ~ _ • . ' ~ , _ - , •I i ~ ° : . _ fi ~ , , . • . -~--s.
~
,
F • -
,
' .
S P O K A1-4 E C (D U N T Y
UTILITIES DIVISION • A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
N. Bruce Rawls, P.E., Utilities Director Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 21, 1996
TO: John Pederson and Steve Davenport
FROM: Katherine M~~~~Water Resources
SUBJECT: DRZE-172-96; Inland Asphalt, Landfill
This proposed development is situated partially within a 100 year flood hazard area (
flood map attached). The proponent will need to obtain a floodplain development
permit from the engineers office prior to any development taking place on-site.
The requirements for new development in identified floodplains in this area are:
• Under runoff conditions, the proposed landfill site receives floodwaters. Before a
floodplain development permit can be issued for filling the pit, a detailed flood analysis
will need to be prepared by the landowner's engineer. The analysis will need to
address the upstream and downstream impacts from the proposed filling of the pit to
show no effect on the floodplain.
• Not more than 5% of the floodplain can be covered with impervious surfaces (parking
lots; roof tops, impervious landfill blankets, etc. If the plans include covering more
than 5% of the floodplain, an infiltration analysis and resultant plans wilt also be
necessary to account for the infiltration area lost.
• A Floodplain Development Permit will be issued with the condition that the lowest
floor, including subgrade floors be at or above the 100 year flood elevation; or non-
residential structures be floodproofed to that elevation. The finai floor elevation will
need to be verified after construction with an Elevation Certificate.
1026 W. Broadway • Spokane, WA 99260-0180 •(509) 456-3604 FAX: (509) 456-4715 TDD: (509) 324-3166
♦ _ s.
• Hazardous materials (which includes gasoline) must be located outside the limits of
the 500 year floodplain.
This department is also concerned about water quality of the groundwater. While
proposal states that only inert material will be placed in the landfill, The main route of
the Chester Creek watershed groundwater flows through this area and a landfill could
allow direct contact with pollutants into this groundwater resource.
If you have any questions regarding the flood permit process, please contact Tammie
Williams (456-3600), of Water Resources and Utilities.
0
~ O
~ s
' ~+atN ERLY
rtRC
• " - .
R
_ _Sri , si , _ i ~t ' Y
Y ~r • ~ f, t ~ . : v , 1
_ S. ~ , ' . ' ~.r `s~
''v+ .~~7r 1 r ' ~ . ~ r . 1 .7 1~,.~ "~SY~~ ~`~a,,, w~' ..r~•~
N
V pOW N ~ _ _ , ti~~ ,y . .
9 ~-7 =~.y _ r'~ L•:'ty' ;~`3
i ~ ~~t, - -•,F' _ r,~r .~a. :
..e~ `.w - ~ :
ZO~E Ag ~ - .
~ •
lp ~ v
1 1T.~~ `
' pYENiSE 'T N • i
~ ~
~
. ,
ZpNE
~
a
` RC!153
~ Farrr► Road.
ti
2 ~
? ~'v 2016
~
c c, ;
a
~p? 9
~ ~
PHONE (509) 534-2657 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION #IN-U4-NA-'304K5
FAX (509) 534-9787 ' os.«N(---~,` Inland Aco%P%halt Company . S1NCE 1934
5111 E. BROADWAY • P.O. BOX 3366 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3366
March 28, 1996
,
Office of Spokane
County Engineer
Division of Engineering and Roads SPoUNE cc;;",~r
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Attn: Scott Englehard
Ref: Zone Change Conditions/#DRE-171-96
Gentlemen:
As promised at our meeting this morning, I am providing the following
information:
1. Chad Coles' analysis indicates "Acme Materials" will be hauling waste
material. We don't think Acme is involved. Ha!
2. The capacity of our Chester Pit calculates to be 383,000 cubic yards.
3. Based on a truck and pup capacity of 20 c.y./truck, the landfill could only hold
19,150 loads, which equates to 44,428 ESALs total.
4. We project that it will take 20 years to fill the landfill, so the annual ESALs
would be 2,221.
5. Actual projected landfill usage with 2,221 ESALs/year is significantly less
than the 30,160 ESALs/year that Chad used in his calculations.
Since the projected ESALs from our potential landfill operation relates to only
(2,221 /11,070) 20% of the existing ESALs, it will be interesting to see what depth
of over!ay, if any, might be required with this new information.
Sincerely,
INLAND T COMPANY
a
R E Wild, P E
General Manager
REW/su
c: Michael Murphy
Randy Waters/Jana McDonald
An Equal Opportunity Employer
PHONE (509) 534-2657 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION #IN-LA-NA-'304K5
FAX (509) 534-9787 ' •
6iMllj`~y Inland Asjohalt Company • SINCE 1934
z
«
~ ~ ' •
5111 E. BROADWAY • P.O. BOX 3366 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3366
YIL.
February 28, 1996
i e ~
P[8- i2 -q(r
~~ENED
Office of the Spokane
County Engineer 1 ~
Division of Engineering & Roads SPOKARlE COUN o YEPdGINEER
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Attn: Scott Engelhard
Ref: Zone Change Conditions #DRE-172-96
Inland Asphalt Company
Gentlemen:
In regard to Spokane County's proposed requirement that Sands Road be
overlayed from Dishman-Mica Road to the Chester Landfill as a condition of our
re-zone request for the Chester Sand Pit, please consider the following:
1. The existing roadway in question according to the plans for CRP 1596 (dated
8/25/77), shows the typical section to be constructed with 3" of crushed
surfacing top course and 3 1/2" of asphalt concrete pavement.
2. During our pavement evaluation performed February 27, 1996, we found the
existing roadway to be in excellent condition with very little pavement distress
or deterioration, in spite of previous truck traffic destined for the Chester
Landfill.
3. The typical section of the existing roadway conforms to the design of most
city and county arterials, as well as most industrial areas such as the
Inland/Ceritrai Pre-N1ix facility at 5uiiivan Fcoad, tne Spokane industrial Park,
etc. that carries heavy truck traffic.
4. Since the existing Chester Landfill is getting close to capacity, there should
be very little, if any, additional truck traffic on Sands Road with the approval
of our re-zoning. Very soon landfill material will be deposited at our site only,
not both.
- continued -
An Equal Opporfunity Employer
. Spokane County Planning Department
Zone Change Conditions # DRE-172-96
February 27, 1996
Page two
5. The estimated cost to overlay the aforementioned section of Sands Road is
as follows:
E80 tons ACP oyzr{ay @ $36.00 = $241480.00
250 sy Grinding @ $15.00 = 31750.00
Traffic Control @ $2,500.00 = 2,500.00
Total: $30,730.00
6. The slight impact of "new" truck traffic on Sands Road destined for the
proposed re-zoned landfill does not seem to warrant the impending $30,000
out-of-pocket expense to Inland Asphalt Company by Spokane County.
Sincerely,
INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY
REWiId, PE
General Manager
c: Michae! K Murphy
Randy Waters
Jana McDonald
PHONE (509) 534-2657 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION qIN-LA-NA-'304K5
FAX (509) 534-9787 ' Q`6[Mlio' Inland Asphalt Compa'ny • SlNCE 1934
5111 E. BROADWAY • P O. BOX 3366 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3366
IN[/1tMarch 20, 1996
Office of Spokane
County Engineer
Division of Engineering & Roads
1026 W Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170 ~
Attn: Scott Engelhard
Ref: Zone Change Conditions #DRE-172-96
. Gentlemen:
While I have not received a written response to my February 28, 1996 letter
regarding the proposed overlay on Sands Road, I was just informed by Jana .
McDonald that you verbally indicated that a 2 1/2" overlay on Sands Road will be
required as a condition of our zone change request. Jana also indicated that you
stated that all costs involved in the overlay will be at Inland Asphalt's expense.
In order for me to better understand the basis of your requirement, please
consider providing the following information:
1. Is the resurface needed to maintain and restore the existing pavement,
perhaps because of previous residential and truck traffic?
2. Is the resurface needed to increase the structural capacity of the pavement uje___~3
fcr any future tra"150 destined s-Ui'ely fol- oUr N; Opcscd landfil{?
3. What technique was used to evaluate the existing pavement structure, or its ?
load-carrying capacity? `
4. What criteria was used to determine the "future" design loads on Sands
Road? ~
- continued -
_ . . -
MAR 2 1 1996 '
SPO~~~ ~U~~TY ENGti~EER . ,
m~.
. . _ -
An Equa! Opportunity Employer
.
5. Please provide any test data, calculations, or existing pavement deficiencies ?
used to determine the overlay depth. `
6. Please provide examples of other zone requests that have previously been
granted with an overlay to the site as a condition of the request.
Cinr`ere!y,
INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY
\
REWiId, PE
General Manager
REW/su
c: Michael K Murphy
Randy Waters
Jana McDonald
MAR-12-1996 14:46 INLAND ASPHALT 509 534 97E7 P.01
RHQNE (506) S36,2657 , COlRRACTOR REGISTRA7t6H @W-Vt-W301KS
sAX (509) 534-9T8T l" Inland Aspohalt Company' SlNGE 1934
~ 5111 E. BROADWAY • P.O. 80X 3366 • SPOKANE, WASNINGTON 99220-3366 `
` .
February 28, 1996 7671 Date3_iZ-~~ POSt-ft° Fax Ncte from p(~
s
co.lve2~• r~
~ Phone
Office of the Spokane phom
Fax ; 21
County Engineer Fax 0
Division of Engineering & Roads 1026 W groadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Attn: Scott Engelhard
Ref: Zone Change Conditions #DRE-172-96
Inland Asphaft Company
Gentlemen:
In regard to Spokane County's proposed requirement that Sands Road be
overlayed from Dishman-Mica Road to the Chester Landfill as a condition of our
re-zone request for the Ches#er Sand Pit, please consider the following:
1. The existing roadway in question according to the plans for CRP 1596 (dated
8/25R7), shows the typical section to be constructed with 3" of crushed
surfacing top course and 3 1/2" of asphalt concrete pavement.
2. During our pavement evaluabon performed February 27, 1996, we found the
existing roadway to be in excellent cond'rtion with very !ittle pavement distress
or deterioration, in spite of previous truck traffic destined for the Chester
Landfili.
3. The typical section of the existing roadway conforms to the design of most
city and county arterials, as well as rnost industria( areas such as the
InlandlCentral Pre-Mix facility at Sullivan Road, the Spokane Industrial Park,
etc. that carries heavy truck traffic.
4_ Since the existing Chester Landfill is getting close to capacity, #here should
be very iittfe, if any, additional truck traffic on Sands Road with the approval
of our re-zoning. Very soon landfill material will be deposited at our site only,
not both.
- continued -
I~ C~..~I
MAR-12-1996 14:47 INLAND ASPHALT 509 534 97E7 P.02
Spokane County Planning Department
Zone Change Conditions # DRE-172-96
February 27, 1996
Page two
5. The estimated cost to overiay the aforementioned section of Sands Road is
as follows:
680 tons ACP overlay @ $36.00 = $24,480.00
250 sy Grinding @ $15.00 = 3,750.00
Traffic Control @ $2,500.00 = 2,500.00
Total: $30,730.00
6. The slight impact of unem: truck traffic on Sands Road destined for the
proposed re-zoned landfill does not seem to warrant the impending $30,000
out-of pocket expense to Inland Asphalt Company by Spokane County.
S'tncerely,
INIAND ASPNALT COMPANY
~
R E 1NId, P E
General Manager
c: Michael K Murphy
Randy Waters
Jana McDonald
R uirements for
Overia eq Sands Road
y - - - -
. ~
DisPosal Site Load OnlY Total Pavement Load
Test Site Lane 5 years 10 years 15 years .5 years 10 years 15 years
Y
0 1 1.69 2.19 2.52 1.90 2.42 2.76
0 2 3.69 4.33 4.74 3. 9 8 4.64 5.07
0.1 1 2.11 2.64 2.98 2.36 2.90 3.26
0.1 2 2.02 2.55 2.88 2.26 2.80 3.17
: - _ . - .
0.2 1~ 2.07 2.64 3.02 2.33 2.93 3.31
0.2 2 0.98 1.48 1.79 1.19 1.71 2.02
0.3 1 1.85 2.43 2.81 2,12 2.74 3.12
0.3 2 1.86 2.36 2,69 2.10 2.62 2.95
- - - ;
0.4 1 1.50 2.05 2.38 1.74 2.31 2.67
0.4 2 0.74 1.26 1.57 0.98 1.50 1.83
, _ . _ . . _
Avera9e 1.85 2.39 2.74 2.10 2.66 3.02
_
STD 0.793564 0.828466 0.85715 0.811914 0.850269 0,881138
.
~
Overiay Requirements for Sands Road
. , -
. ~
Disposal Sit-e Load OnlY Total Pavement Load
Test Site Lane 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years
0 1 1.69 2.19 2.52 1.90 2.42 2.76
0 2 3.69 4.33 4.74 3.98 4.64 5,07
0.1 1 2.11 2.64 2.98 2.36 2.90 ' 3.26
, , .
0.1 2 2.02 2.55 2.88 2.26 2.80 3.17
_ . , .
0.2 I 1 2.07 2.64 3.02 2.33 2.931 3.31
0.2 2 0.98 1.48 1.79 1.19 1.71 2.02
0.3 1 I 1.85 2.43 2.81 2.12 2.74 3.12
0.3 2 1.86 2.36 2.69 2.10 2.62 2.95
0.4 1 1.50 2.05 2.38 1.74 2.31 2.67
0.4 2 0.74 1.26 1.57 0.98 1.50 1.83
Avera e- 1.85 2.39 2.74 2.10 2.66 3.02
. .
~ ~
STD 0.793564 0.828466 0.85715 ' 0.811914 0.850269 0.881138
,
►
~ .
S P O K A N E C O u N T Y
A DTVISION OF THIE PUBI.iC ~ti''uttKS DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF PLANNIIVC
MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 19, 2002
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard,
c% Sandy Kimball
Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman
Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane County Water District No. 3
Central Valley School District No. 356
Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles
Spokane Transit Authority, Gordon Howell
Washington State Department of Transportation, Greg Figg
Washington State Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell
Washington State Department of Ecology, Heidi Scheibner
Washington State Department ofNatural Resources, Chuck Gulick
Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, JeffAzerrad
Washington State Department of Health
Spokane Regional Solid Waste System, Dennis Hein
Union Pacific Railroad
FROM: John Pederson, Scnior Plaliner
SUBJECT: Reyuest for renewal uf Conditior~z Use Permit, CUE-1-96
Please review the above-subject request submitted by Inland Asphalt Company and provide your
written comments and recommended updated conditions to me by August 1, 2002. If you have
any questions, feel free to contact me at 477-7212.
wc
Attachments: Letter from inland Asphalt
copy without attachments to: Jana McDunald, Inland Asplialt Company, PU Box 3366, Spokane,
WA 99220
A1AIL S'PUP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (5()9) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 4777-7133
.
PNQNE (50) 634-2667 CONTRACTOR REGIBTRATION rIN-tI1-kA-•304K5
~FAX (5Q9) 534-9787 Asphalt Company Inland SlN
CE 1934
_ `5111 E BROADWAY • P O SOa: 3366 • SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99220-3:366
/1,'•"July 3, 2002 :
,
CERTIFIED MAIL ~~Ar1Y
7001 1940 0001 5916 0055 aM2
l
Division of Building and Planning
SPOKANE COUNTY 1
1026 W Broadway ~
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Renewal of CUE-1-96
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter serves as notices that Inland Asphalt Company is requesting to renew
the conditional use permit referenced above. The permit is for an inert landfill
located at 44~' and Sands Road.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact myself at 533-0238 or Ken Gibson at 536-2628.
Sincerely,
INLAND ASPHALT CO.
z
J a McDonald
Environmental Engineer
An Eqcial Opporttjnrf~, LErnpluver
J
PAG. 1 lU . 0 0" . ~3, 0 1 i liL ~u02
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
04559 STARR RD (START) .000 PAINTER RD R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
STARR RD 1.000 STAFFORD RD (START) R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
1.510 END GR.AVEL/START PAV R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
STARR RD (END) 1.520 WHEELER RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
0 4 5 6 0 STARR RD ( STAR.T ) .000 TRUAX RD & WHEELER R R 09 GR.AVEL 14
STARR RD .080 BR 5208 OVER S ROCK R 09 GRAVEL 14
.900 SANDERS RD R 09 GR.AVEL 16
STARR RD (END) 1.910 DAVIS RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
0 4 5 6 3 STARR RD (START ) . 000 CAMERON RD ( END R R 09 GR.ADED/DR.AINED 16
STARR RD 1.010 STRINGHAM RD R 08 GRAVEL 18
2.010 DRUMHELLER RD R 08 GR.AVEL 18
2.450 BR 5390 UPRR UNDERPA R OS GRAVEL 18
3.030 ELDER RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
4.360 MICA PEAK RADAR SITE R 09 GRAVEL 20
4.900 ALPINE FERN LN (PVT R 09 GRAVEL 20
STARR RD (END) 6.360 NORTH END OF ROAD R 09 GR.AVEL 12
04565 STARR RD (START) .000 RIVER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
STARR RD .570 WELLESLEY AV U 17 PAVED 20
.680 UPRR CROSSING #65351 U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.700 KILDEA RD U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.730 KILDEA RD Y U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.080 ROWAN AV (START) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
1.210 JOSEPH AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
1.460 DALKE AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
1.640 ROSEW40D AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
1.900 ROXANNE AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
1.960 CORDOBA AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
2.060 SAN CARLOS AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
2.190 BRIDGE #5675 @ BNSF U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 18
2.220 SR 290 R 07 PAVED 20
2.290 HEATHER LN (END) R 07 PAVED 20
2.350 COLE AV (END) R 07 PAVED 20
2.650 MARVE LN (PVT RD) R 07 FAVED 20
2.820 LINCOLN DR (STAR.T) R 07 PAVED 20
3.220 MORRIS R.D (END) R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 20
3. 3 2 0 MURR.AY RD ( S TP,RT ) R 07 L I GHT B I TUM . 20
3.860 MOFFAT RD (START) R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 20
4.360 WEST NEWMAN LAKE DR R 08 LTGHT BITUM. 20
4.860 BR #5605 OVER NEWNIAN R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22
5.850 EAST NEWMAN LAKE DR R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22
STARR RD (E1VL) 5.890 HAUSER LAKE RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22
04561 S TA.RR RD ( S TART ) .000 DAV I S RD R 09 GR.AVEL 20
f
STARR RD (END ) 1.290 BRADSHAW RD R 09 GR.AVEL 20
04562 STARR RD (START) .000 BRADSHAW RD R 09 GR.AVEL 14
STARR RD (END) 1.780 CHATCOLET RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
04567 STARR RD (START) .000 BLANCHARD RD R 09 GRAVEL 14
STARR RD (END) .710 NORTH END OF ROAD R 09 GRAVEL 12
7 Records Processed
~
~ . ~ ~
6-40-
10
s. ,
~
• ~
. `
r• ,,f ; ~
. <
tj
r {
. l t►' ~';y1 r
+ EM
a ~
~ .
NVI
r
~ ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` • i~
• ° t{ t
s i ~ ' ~,~r~ ' 3 r •
y
t~ 1, 1, t,► ~rd t •
- 4' ~t • f w . -
~;i ~~t~ • ~
~ ~ + ~r~ . + ° r
f' i ~l~+~~~ i~rr~-;~~ • 'a•
:
~
4 • r`~ + ~ r
~ ^ .
, , .
- • ' ~ '6.~ r
t--
Y
~ < .
~ , ~ ~ ' ' ~T.~. , ~ • 3 r `
. ~ . r or
~
• , . . '
4 wl~ s
• ~ y .,r ~ >
► ~ k ~ ^y ~ + ;
Ys r ~ r ~
~ .
, R
,
• j~
M~
~
~
s
• ~ ~f ~
Parcel: 45334.9055
Owner: INLANO ASPHALT
CoOwner:
453 ~
Owner Address +sM 9164 52 ~
PO BOX 3366 SPOKANE WA 99220-3386 USA { 1 4533+90511
~
45 , i l:545 371~ 3] 19ri . i1
Tl.I 1t 331 N
Address I1l 'Sn` °ir
Site _9~
4 J]4
0 ADDRESS UNKNOWN SPOKANE 5333 1521 ~ 45334 9152 y;~;•:,~
~~a ~~~w;..i •x~`-~x,~;'. '
, R ~ ~ 70~ }}ti: ;titi•.
as 34LeAal DescriPtfon ~ _ ~~r' a 9
•;v.'~~ ;`{'x .,r~ ,
a~ ~d ~
IS l4 I 333 i,
33-25-44 PTN OF S1l2 OF SE114 LYG SW OF OWR&N CO R1W
EXC 91 r~ i rti,,
537317(! , ~
BEG
4, 333 I ~ 333 UCG'
'~};ti ...v.~• ' ~r ~ y` :,v'
IJl 915/ .1 J n'l •.~;{~:•r'f v.•} ~:~:;•h'.•: {;jr;•,
AT S114 COR TH NODEG 04MIN W1142.SFT TH S44DEG 31MIN •
E470.8 4 :5~•: ~ : ~~ti~ r .
33I 1 19
73 4 fi' :ti•. , ,f.{: j~~:.
15 J3 I r:S
333 11 ,s 9liv
FT TH NODEG 04MIN W194.5FT TH S55DEG 48MIN E399.31 FT ~
TH g ~
1o1o2 Mw1oioi 4+ai 0088
a z ~ ~ 1 ~y4
2 s 2 2.*1 4o64 ~~+2 oiai.o
<-al UIUI
SODEG 04MIN E780FT TH N89DEG 4TMIN W660FT TO POB & a2 os 4 o 1 °1 ~10 ~
EXC ~042 o 1 2 0 4' 0 ° `7 ~ a3.o1o ` BEG 4+a3o 2 aa.oi aai9~
4a2oso a2os ~wl 06„~101] O8U 101 ,
AT S1l4 COR SEC 33 TH N ALG N& S C/L 460FT TH E330FT 1 20 ~°42 010 „a; Naa
TH A az.a a3ost a2 o6oc~a2 o~o I'
uia w1~u~
44 . 3 C042 066 • 'I
11017 0 5 042060 ' "p11 9007
N348FT TO TRU E POB OF THIS PARCEL TH NWLY 471.09FT 042 osa 042 140
TO PT +40420 40+1o 1!1 aai 9we
IN a7 1+ at14o I
~ a2 14 1 4ass
N& S CENTER S EC LN 1142.86FT B QF S1l4 COR TH N ON 5D ~jw21 921 1 a~ `~2 u a2.1444r o~,~1.o
LN ;~i at.i4 Ma NtI a i7 a2 14h ~
22,9FT M!L TO OWR&N R R R1W TH SELY ALG SD R1W LN ,
31.17FT
MIL TO S LN OF SPO CO RO TH ALG SD S LN OF SD RD TO PT
N
OF
POB TH 582.96FT M!L TO POB; T OGETHER WITH THE N112 OF
VAC
r,, i I + _ . . '+f 7'%' Y_"9r~~ ~ : j
=-3gTH AVE
' I
Ci71N AVENUE
O
Q
O
oG
4OTH AVENUE
\1
Z I
N
G
3
O
~
HATHERIY
CIRCLE
~
RM52 X
sur,ooW N '
II
.
f ZONE A6
r----z ~ .
I Ul
~ .
~ Z
Q 'I
~44TH AVENUE J T 25 N.
J T 24 N _
~
ZONE C
~ %A
W
M-
Q
m \
N
•
1'f
~
J ~
i. . i,wr , , . . . - , 4 , p _ _ _ . - - _
i . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
, 7 l I ' . ~ '
1 ~ • ~ -r
~t
_ ~~r ~ + ~ ; ~ f . z{
_ ~ ~ c ~ - ~
' ~ , s • ~t ~ = w- , _ _ + - d
~ ~ , ~
R/~I 7.~- ~
' I i
i
J
~ ' 30~ 3~ ~ i~
~
l ~ Y A8 E ~ ARI L ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 15 TO 20 20 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~i
i ~
•
_ _ a! ~ I
d
~ ~ ~A~ , _ , r _ I
~aR ~ ~ oQ~ s~ - ~ ~
„ n
~ ~
' ~ Y (l. 5~ C ~P~C ~~PTH I Q I a~fl~iPA~T~D DEPTFi O.IT COMPAC . ED DEPTH 2 0 TEp t,
I " F~ A `"-HALT ~RUSH~D SURF~Cl~CG C~~SS ~ ASP~iALT CLASS E S
CONCR~T~, CONCRET~ ~OP COURSE.
~
~5 Ta t~+ao TATION 13+~ 3 S . N4T~ ~ ij
~ 5EE fRI~DE S~fEETS
F4R CR~'~ 6~ SUf~ER Y ~ ~ ~ r144~ ~ ~
ELE1lAT~a S~CfiIQ~S. ~
~ t b
i ~
~ l
a P ~
y ~4
a k ~ 4 - ` ' ~ 1 I
I' rl r r ~g ^ 1_ ~ IA ti
1 ~ 5 4 ~1, `~F r ~ , ~ ~ v ~ ~T } e , 4 ' ~ i n f t v ~ ' ~ ' _ ,
r~ ~J~ }t ~ fx ry ~ - - ~ , ' . + ; d+
t" , "a i , ~ . 4 . . f ~
- ° r- + ~ I~ S~ , - - ~i ~ ~ ~ - ~ - h- ti' i, : a * rc ~r
~ q , ~ ~ o , _ ° ~ , , ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ yf ~ , ~ 71J~ 1 c ` 41~ ` 'L 4Lf 4 C1 ' ~1.~f L Y ~ c ' ~~i : _ _ s - e t ~ .f
a + ~f i~ _ ` ~ ' ~ ! 1 ~ ' ' - ~ 4 ~e4 _ ~ - i ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r ~
~ ~ . 1 ~ S ~ f ~ ~ Mr ~ _ ~ ~ Y _ ' u 1~ y t ` , r _ ' ' 7 _ ~ _ ~ , t • ~ r r ~ x ~ a ~ r r~ . ~ ~ - - , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . .
. , 7 ~ ~ "r9 • ~r Jl.~ , , . . , ' „ ..f~Y~l..~f. ' . . , ~ . . ~ ~ ' ' . . ' - , . . ' S Su R tla u ' ~ n ~i ~ • ~ 1 ~ ~ ~4 l
~t ~ - 5- ~ - / - rS - ` ~ ~ _ u ' m - ` ` ' - • . " • • C . . ~ ~ I
~~rt . _ ~a~ D, ~ ~ - } ~ ~~I~}p].~~ ' ~ ~ _L` f ^ 'y. i~ ' I y '3~ I ~ ' ' ~ ~r v !il ~:.1 t4 y~ ~ t~ +1 ~ _ ~ C ~7 b_ ` - , _ ~ ~.i,+,_v^i~ a~~Ht ~ ~ar.+~ 1 + R e. sa
- - r ~ - _ - e F 5 _ / • ~ - .t . : ~ - ~ f a ~t ~ ,.7 ~ ~ ,~i _ i ~L- ~a-~ x , - ~ - t ~y~, v - - x . Y W , ' _ ~ ~ 3 ~Y r _ . ~ ~ - y - - SHEET
- : EC 1~4 , ~ , r _ _ I ~ ~ R ~ a i s b`Ss 1" rc ;,5 ° ~a Z Y h ~ e a- ♦ ~ 7~ _ ~ ~.+V , t t'` - ~ ~ < ' ~ f ` - ~i1 ' 4 j'~~ +J~~r: li _ o` ~'r#'~n~.,~tcrr;' « i - _ ,~4 . fi~ , ~ ~ - ~ - a , ~r- r~°,`- _ -"~~1 . ~ R • A 6 - ~ ` ~ /Y~y ~ - 1 - "
d• . _ - --ti_ " t__ 1 _ ' _ 1 . - - - . ~ . c _ r , ~ _ r-,_ a~ ` w- - -a^~. ~-'19~ :.°.~.._Lca.~~t~u`..r.e:.~ 1: z i ~ ~I! .
r -
1
i~
. '
- - - - - -
S . ~ . _ . ` • I IV ; ~
IJ ~ r
R/W
>
J ~
ly ~ ~ ~ v~~rae~.E-3d MIN~UN! .YARfABL~-~a ~i~l~u~ t ,
, ~ ~ , ~
r R
YpRIA9LE VaRIABLE ~ , ~ ~
~ ZO TO I 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ,
~ w ~
. ~ _ ' TYI eTYPICAL DITCH ,
TY ~ A ~ILL ~ ~3: YR C L I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 u ~CTION ~EFT QR RlGFiT 3 ~ , 0 l2 CUI~P~CT~D OEPTH Q.I7 G~t~RAC ~EO QEPTH ~.~5 C4MPACT~D aEPTH . CT![3N I FFT ~R 6al[.WT ~ r- = • ° _ : - - - ~
, , '1 u~ P A T ~`~~PNA T CRll~HED SURFACIi~~ CLASS 9 A5 H L CLASS E L
• CONCRETE . CONCRET~ . TaP COURSE . ~ i
° ~4T E~ . l~
SEE G~~£ S~iEETS NQ~f~~ JTCH WIDENING ON i ~
~QR CR01~f~ ~ ~UPER 7 0o Ta 3~~~~ ST~TION + SPECIAL aITCH ~IID! ELE'~ATEQ SECTIONS, 1' FRQN9 S TA. 2C-#- 80 '
TH~ RIGIiT ~RON~ ; - - = RrW
a TO STA. ~9 ~-~3 .
~ ~ ~ ~p ~o
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t $ II~ 2 a R/W. ;
~'ARI~~LE S P ~ ' T R/~. LQ E 1'4 R ~a . ~ SI.~PE ~ f YARIA9L
~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ r . , ,
_ TYPICQL ASPH~#LT a!~ C4~9PACT~D DEPTM ~ I7 ~lRACT~D DE~'~M ~?.25 C.O~+1P~4~T~D aEPT~ T1fPIC~L ASPH~ILT ~ON ~
~ n 14 ~f iA , E~ SEE ~~CT~~N ~LA~S ~ ASPHALT Gt.~SS ~~SP~O~T ~Rt~S1iEa SUR~A~4t~G UTT R , G E ~ S~EE SECTI01~ ~L4~. C~~CR~T~ . CQ~T~. . ~QP C~U~tSE . BE ~V.
~,o~v ~ ~ ~
z' EDG~ aF ROAOY~i~Y PBIVEI~ENT. ~ ~~'~TIC~N + - 32 ~8 T4 ~~J 33
_ 1Q ~I~MU., r ~ J~ ~ • :
. ~ . . ~ ~ ~ J
V,17~ C0~lRRCTED QEPTM 0.~~ C4~IR4CTE0 D~~TP~ _ ~ k
' ~ ~ 113~ c~Ass ~ as~~r c~u~~o su~cr~c ~
~ ~ar~c~~~. a~+ eouRSE . ~ r~~~: ~ I 1 ~
' H TYP CA ~ A , ~~a~ F~ oi~c I L PN L T G~ ~ r ~
, G~lE ~I R1~E! ~T 'C~#iS 3. ~ STA. 33-~7~ T~ 3?-~33 LEF ~ T o
_ t~Q~AT ~Q ~T. F tid ~ ~ 1 ~
TA . 34 ~ T~ 3~~ f R~GW c~ S T , -
- ~~t ' ~ P ~'c ~4~ ~ T~ ~A~E ' ` ; ~ ~~r~ ~
, Y IA ~ YA,RtI~BLE 4° ~ b .
~ ~ ~ /fy~yr -
~e ~ !7 w'- ~ ► ~F ; - ~ - r ~PICAL E S CTf THR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N~t~ ~ ,
a ~ r _ ~1 STATI N ~ 6 ~ ~
~ ~ [~~i~' ~ ~
~ ~ ~~P1i~ ~~~`E~ ~EF~1'~ , ~ ~ ~ +G~.~~~ ~ ~5~~~' . ~t~~.il~ ~1RfAC~NG► ~ , , _
. ~ ~~►ww~~rt~~ ~ • T`4~ ~~~E, ~ - , ~ ' ~ , -
e P r ~ ~ 1 e ^ h ~ .
~ , ~ ~I R A ~ ~ CH ~ , , . ~ ~ ~ t ~ . , , , - - ~
, ; ~ r y f~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ .~r , , . ~ : ~ ~ ~ . . ~ , ~ 'tt~. ~ a
U k ~ • ~ - SHEEi , . ,
f ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ os a SN R. ~ ,
. . . . . . . . - ~
~O !♦V~ V~V C ~Y~ ~ • M r w r ► • . . f b • i/~ ~ ~
~ ~ Tif
~ - ~ -
t
~ ~ s r -
~ ~ ~ , E~ ' ~
e~~a° ts 34 S 33 T 25 N R 44 E W~. ,~M ' R ~ 57Q0' i ~
v`3 , T•6r~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ia~s~ ~
, . ' ~ BG~LE . . r•:d aa~t
P~ d veRT
~ ~ -16 _
_ MATCH L NE S1iEET o~ ,P~~ j~ E~~A , rmE sra ti+~s m FICrTE srA zi+as nt xe+fla Lr
~~sroe~ ~ ~ ° Efr OTHEAS ~ ~ ~ ea~+s~,crwr~ 4FENM Is ro eE sewcArea av orkeAS PRiaa no caf+sKC,crKM
I "a i ~N ~
` ~t _ Q ~c t i ~ f * t~ ~ ~ w * n r e a N ~ r ~ i r
M h 5fA 174 4b 29 ~T 5TA 20 ET j ~ 3~G~N fiP£q ~1 clyd TAPER ON ~ a o E 4F p6YEMEPIT_ EOGE l~f pAVf MEIi~ ~
~ J~' PIlY+f q ' _ ~ ~ ' ~ - ia' ~be ra P~ros ~ p~..~,~._~ ~a I f4' PIH4 ~
TBt~ p~+A ~ 0 ~ 7° ~ x'~ H
- ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~w ~ w w x
h . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~u~ ~ ~ N . , in N
r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ tl~t317h' W
~ ~ " ~-~--~h'~OsfE Ex1571i1d PdYEYErT `Y ` ~ ~ " ~ t i ~ " ~ z
1 ' a ' ' _ ~ . . JI > ? ( I ~ i y . . ~ . . ~ . ~ .Y . ....~..r~~. • . . i . ~1f~tlee~.. . 7 , ~ ~
1 „ M1 • t A 4 4 ~ ~ K~ .S r. • r f A _ R w ~ rt ~ , ^x , ij ~ ~sc , x A g
~ rP .P_~
$ ~ ~ GOUNTY ROAD PFtQJECT No 1596
h' rTA 20 RT ~rQ~~rY ~ ~ 5TA IT4<9ZJ RT EfiD TAPfR Q~ BEaIN raPfa On EncE aw r~vFMEnT. ~~~54~t~ 1 5 - sANas Roao
€A6E OP YE~EMT. nOTE 5T~ iB~B$ TO 2J hqq RT ~u ~ ++~t ~
HfM10VF 9 AEPI~GE Ff,k~ 4N R!N uPPE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Y~~ Da d . OFFICE 4F
■ P F ~FI +~~~1' y ~ ~ ' J~~rl~~ a~ COUN7Y EMGINEER 0~s ~ SP07(ANE COLlNTY, W/Wr f.
. i . ~ u~v~r~o 5uRVE7rED D~C. 1976
~ 4NE CJ1t1. N~JM,i~ Aa~anv~n 2 ' HR. Np~TICF I~ Ap~ED 4-14"Wv ~W SPOKAHE LCI~MTY E?!G
RUIRfD sN~{r i SMEET 9 dF O StEFET9
~ - _ _ - - j--~~_--_ _ - - ~ ~ _r ~ ~ = --t ~ ~~►----+~~-~t . _ ~ _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ . . . _ _ _ - - - - - E E- - - -
' t_. ; ~ ~ E. ~ _ _ i n - - - , ; - - - - - - ~ ~ . - ~ ~ T ; ~ . _ _ _ ; _ ~ k ~ , ~ ~ - - - - - - - - ~ , . - - - - - - ~ _ _ _I ; ~ , , _ E` ~ - = - ~ - - - r ~ - - - - -h-- - ~ - - - - - _ . _ a.. _ r, y '
G R ' - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ - - - _ - - - i - ' --}-Y.. ~ ~ _ - - , IT_ ---d - - -I 1„ ' _ i ~ ~ ,-I I ~ ' Y ~ - - - - - ~ i - _ ~i s---f - --F-- ,r ' - • - ~ _ a . - _ ~ - - I
_ ~ - - ~ , - - M - - - - . , ~ _ _ ~ 1 ~ , ~ _ , - - - - k N ; ~ i , ~ - - - - ~ , . - - = _ - - - -
- - - - - - _ , _ _ - - - ~ - ~ a - } - ~ ` _ ~ - ---~-~-j f ----~f-•-° ~~`y C - _ ~ _ = . ~ ~ ~ ~ , , - _ _ 1 - ~ ~ _ . ~ _ ~ _ - - _ r - - - - , _ _ =P- - ~ - - - - ~ I ~ _ ~ _
~ - - a- - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - I I _ - ~ . - _ F~-_ i I F~--1- i 1 i- ~ ~ ~ ~ I; . _ _ ' ' _ `1' ~ _ = - ~ _ ' ~ - = - _ i _ i- _ - ~ - - ~-r` - . : - _ _ _ ~ ~ - - - - - ~ ; _ - - ~ - ~ - - - - - -1_- ~ ~ ~ ~..,d_ ~ ~
. _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ I _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ - - - - - - - ~ _ ~ I - f-=-- , ~ - , ~ f~ f - ~ ~ - - - - - , _ _ # - _ _ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - _ ~ - .r ~ f j ~ ~ _ ~ ' ` ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ! ~ - - ~ - - ~ ' , m . . ,
~ ~ - ~ - - s - - - ~ - - - z - f - ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ . I _ - ~ ~ _ " ~ ~ - - - ~ - - ~ _ . ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ e -r k--- I F- ti ~ f - M- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i
~ - _ _ ti o _ z ~ _ ~ _ _ f - ~~i = ~ - - ' - - - _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ - - ' - - - - - - - ~ I . f ~ ~ ~ , - _ _ ~a~ ~~~a , _ = ~ - - ~ k- - - - - , n - , , - , - , ~ - - a~- ► ~ ~ ~ , .
~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - ; # - -f - - - , ~ - - - - -J - - 1 ~ - I - - - --I _ - - ~ L°- , ~ - - , ~ _ , _ . _ ~ ~ i - - - ---J- -J f _
- - ~ , ~ _ ~ - - - - . _ + rt--- - . _ _ ~ - _ f - - - ~ ~ - - - - - 1= -i ~ ~~~~-i- , - - _~o i _ f ~~----f ~ ~ t--; ~ ~ . _ - - _ ~ - - Q _ ° ` ~ ; ~-f ; a ~ _a i - _ -t- _ - ~ _ ~ - ^ - ~----t- ~ .
- _ I - - { a F---- - - ~ _ _ 4~~ _ _ _ ~ - - - --1-- - - ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ - ~ i- - - - - - - ~ F . - - - - - - . ~ p - E ' E I-- f - ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , -
_ ~ ~ - - ~ Q ; _ ~ , ~ , ~ _ ~ _ - ► - - ~ , - ~ - . _ _ _ i - _ - ~ ~ ~ - - _ ~ . d 1~~, ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , i - ~ ~ ' ; - - ~ ~ - _ ~ . _ -3 _ _ ~ _ . ~ i - ,-~--I-- ~ - ~ - - - J91~ _ - ~ f~ ~ 4 ~ , , - .
' , I , ~ ~ _ ~ , • ~ - ~ } ' , ; ~ - ° m~ ~~i ~ f I 91~- I , ; h _ - - } f ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ' ; ` ~ - I ' i~ ~ _ ; - ~ l ~ _ - -i _
~ ; f , 1 , i ~ ~ - -{--d - - C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ t M ` I- ; , ~ ; i- I . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ - - _ - . ~ ' - - ~ ~ _ _ , ; _ , - - _ I , I ~ ; ~ ~ , ' ~ r.; , . - - ~ - ~ - . , r ; ~ ~ ~ -i---' ~ - -
~ , ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ I ~ T_ . ~ _ -f - - ~ _ ~ - - I ; ; ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ - , E- M-ti , ~ ~ ~ ~ - , ~ e - --I ~ ~ t-- - - 'A ; ~ i , ~ ~ ~ ~ i , ~ F I~; = a~ - - ~ - ~ - ~
~ ` ~ _ ~ } , f ~-m--~~ y ~ ' ' + ' - ~ - r i - ~-D - - ' ~r - ~ ~ - 1 4~ ' F-- ~n,. ~ ~ - ~ ; ~ , , ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , I-- ~ , ~ F-- , ~a , , ~ i - i =r' ~ , , , ~ I , 1 ' I 9 L '
a ~ ~ ~ _ ~ , - I - ` i ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; - - - - ~ - ~ . ~ 1 - - - - ; 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ f , , ~ ~ , , ~ , , f , ~ ~ - - ~ = - - ~ rA ; - _
----f- - , x . , , , . , . , , , ~ , ~ , 3 ~ ~ 1t ~ , , ~ ; , ' 4_ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~y~ 1 ~ 1 I I 11 ~ ~ E 1 l li 1 t I~ ~ I I[ I r 1 I T 1 i ~ I 1 1 I I ! ~ . ~ • i 1 ~ I~- ~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ I I 1 ' 1 1 ~ I 1 I
1 i . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1 1 ~ t ' t 1 1 1 i f 1 ~ • i 1 1 __~.j . ~ . 1 1 ~ 1 t 1 L f f i ~ ~ 1 I I ~ I 1 f 1 1 ~ f ~ ~ r ~ : ; ~ ; ~ ; ; ; ~ ; ~ ; , ; ; ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ _ ~ k- - _ i
i ~ ~ '~i i i ~ i i . ~ ~ i } . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ - - - - I } ~ : ' ; ' ~--5 ~ ; ; ; , , 1 ; , , , x ~ ;`i ~'I , _ , ; i i' S , ~ ~ ~ T~ i i ~ : i i i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i 4 r i ~ _ I _ i ~ i I 4~ ~i i
Y ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ l"" ~ i- I i ~ ~ ~ " ~ i~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . l ~ ~ . f , ; , , ~ , , , , ; . , , ~ , ~ ~ , , ; i ~ I • a
~ t~. . ..t ~ ~ ~ i i ~ i ~ i Y ~ ~ i ~ i i i ~ . - f i - I p T. ~ ~ i i . [ , ' ~f I ' ~ ~ i ~ i r i i ~ ~ I , ~ I Y1 ~ i 1 i i ~ ~ - ~ t , ~ ~ -
_ _ i I-- - ~ } 1-'~ I'-t ~ ~ ~ 7 - , }---I-- ' - - I ~ I 1 F- -I~ 1~-- , ~ ~ : ; , . , , , ; . . ; , : ' ; ; ` , . ' ~ i 1 ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ i P i 1 1 I i i i i ~ ~ T I~ I _ i r , 1 i . ~~I~. - - i ' ' ` . . ~ ~ i i 1 i i ~ ~ ~ i - _ E r Y i - ~ r ` - _ i ~ ~ ~
~ r W-R ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 f ~ ' ~ ~ ' i r ~ ; ~ ~ - i i i l ~I y S Y 1 1 1 1 ~ i 1 I 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 I ~ • . ~ ` ~ r ~ ~ i 1 i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I i Y ~ y ~ S~ + f 1 1 1 : ; ' ; 1 Y ~ : 1 I 1 1 f I _ I I _ 1 - ~ 1
II . i ~ . J~I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T i i i ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ i 1 ~ 1 i 1 ; ~ i i 1 1 Y 1 I Y 1 I 1 I 1 I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ t 1 Y I I 1 I I 1 I +-1 I I 1'^~I ~ ~ , . , , , , , ~ ~ " S ~ ~ y . . , , . . s , , ; , , ; ' : : : : . . , , . . . _ , , . . ~ ~ , ~ , . , I-.-r ; . ► --f , , ~ ~
~ . f~ za 2~ I~ _ , ru~, r~~,e i ~ _ ; ;
,
~ 22
- ~ ,
f `
> , ` SEC. 33 T 25 N R.44 EWM ~ ~ - v
} C/~ y~ ~y~ c ~ ~rorE~ ' 9G\i. JJ ~Si:~ R$~ GI.~.~~ ~ 57A 2 y , t,. ar+T ~SL~ sa~ scr~ a i trorE~ i S7A 27 + 88 [4 31; 65 LT
~ ~ ~ ro e~ E ~ IN L~LUDIMG A B~ G~(i WId~E GaTE ~ A IACAFlDN ~
, ~ ` . ~ Sra 2~+ro t~p 23+z~ 1,r r~, aaaov~ ~s nu►r anE . h ~ ~
Ssa.E1 1~iTHU1 THE RCAO R/W n~ f■¢O►wz+! kt F~~ e ►suv~rec . ~ _ . i
, K aa~~ ~v~a ~ r, + ~ _ 1 ~ r ►'c~ ~ m s~ cur ~p ~ ~ ~ e ttac~a ac~~r r , ~ o
~ ~Y d _ , ~ ~a-~ ~r1~ I ~ ~ O~ ~ r~F~it _ •4~
a ~ - ~P s ~~o ~',.a ~ . - '~'k'z~~~ 8 W ~I JV - - ~
e ~ -'~i D ~ 23~1 ~ - ~ ~ ~e~ R o 2f8 6 ~ L ~ ; n~iv~~n a.~v ~oezsa h
~ i , 9fE FE~tGE NfIDU►Idi T~ 16.39D ~ 4 q ~«cra- ~E E R 4~Ra~,v ~ NorE a~ s~r r~ 5 ~ o~~~ ;p / 1 ~ r..~,..`~' _s..~. \ 3 ~ A HEFtE. -i
r'. ~ . - - , ~ ~ k e ~ a,~ f x x ` ; ~ x ■ maw~
9TA A3 ~ 00 L - . - ; ~ ~ . ~~~II~ ~8~.~ A + ' - i L 4F' . , ~ ~ / w ~
_ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' _ _ z r ~ - " - J t
~~.-n t - i~~ / ' r~ -I ' ~ ~ c~.= ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r ~ ~.`IL ~ R`''^~Yc 1`~ ~ ~ a - _ ,1;~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ } J ~ t
~ ' ~ - ~ ~ N ~ _ ~gl~ ' ~ - ~ G - r ~
' , u ~ ~ , ~ ~ ►ivexr ~ k 2a~ap N , , b 7'~'1~' ~Cp ~ ~ i - , ~ r+ . ~ ~
~ b i ' ,,,r ~ „ ~ 4 , ~ +~i ~ ~L - _ ; ~ , r _ ~ J r - - / I
~ ~ _ ~i 't ` ~ - t ~ ~ r x I ~ rn ~ nF ~ ~ W S
ti4 - - _ ' , ~ 04'Jll' ~ ~'l~ , . , ~1 ~ - ~ d r ~ - r. ~ ~ ~ s- N ~ m
ifLB Fl~~ x -~c I " --a •r a x ' ~ , ~ 6 , ~ ~
W ~ ~ ~ O W ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ W ~ Z J
_ _ ' i aV / ~ i i fG 'j} y °Y ° J - ~ '4 LUdIT ~ C#IAkI~L ' - ~ ~ ~ , COUNTY f ~ I
N SAyDS RGAO ~ ~ ~ _ - , xe~s~aa c~n►a~,};~ ~ . ~ ~.r r. ~ 5 , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ -,u'~n - ~ q~~ ro ~ f ~ u ~
~ m ~ ~ 'l ~ ' ' ' ' i d ~ ~Y Id r'~ ~+d1u TA 28 + BO NT ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ i _ - - _ ~ . F ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ _ ~EFO~
E Y~R~ ~I+G ~l ~ ~ , - ~ ~ ' ' L' L ~ - ~ ~ (,J 4 I , ~ . rP ~ fF'~~,,,.s9 ~co~ ~
-a- ~ ~ Fr~na f~~~ SPo ' CDUNTY RQAD PRQJECT Pdo 1596
~ n w ~ x rv ~4 ~ , Ot~E C~u hJUhS~~ suAVer~o 4~~ SANDS ROAD
74•HR NOTICE RE ~ APRRQIffp
~j ; ~ ; ; - _ ~L=e° - ; _ ' _ . . _ ~ ~ - - ^ a~.A _ ~ ~ ---~f . - . ~~-I ~ , , ! + ~ - i ~ ~ ~ k _ ~_E~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ; - ~ - - ; ~ ~ ~ - - - , ~ - ~ - , , i , ; ; ~ ~ - - , , --t E g - - - - ~ 6 t l l ~ ~ ~ SNffT
a h [ I i i i i i~"~;- ~ - s i E f i I i ~ - -~9 _ I ' ~ i ~ s` i ~ ~ i i ' ~ i ~ ~ I i I ~ ~ 1 1 _I I I' ' ~ I I 1 ~r ~ ~ _ 1 f I I I ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~<i ~ ~ . ; ,~r E ~
~ ~ ~ ~ --I ~ ~ , a ~ . ~ I ! , ~ , ~ ~ ~ !~1 ~ f--~- ~ ~ ~ , ; j , - ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ , ~ _ , , _ , , ! ~ , ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `-~iz' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ - - ---I h ~ - ~ ~ ~ , ~ I I + , ~ ~ : , ~ , I ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i n~
, , 1 ; ~ ; ~ _ ~ , -i-~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ~~-i I ' , ` ~ i k y ~ ~ i I r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ I , ! ! r ~ ~ ~ ~ , f I L 1 ~ I I I I 1 I 1 - ~ _ I I ~ I ' i ~I I f l~ ~
r ~ ~ ~ ~ i I , ~ 3 , , ~ . ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ , , ~ 4- - ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ I I - i i ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ _ ] ° - 1 ~ ~ i ~.__i i i i , -I i ; ~ I ~ f I I i ~-M 1 ~ ~ s ~ , - ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ - ~ e , ~ , ~ ~ I ~ . ~ , ~ ' i ~ i- r
' F° -t°~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ i--; I f ~ ; i - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ -i i ; ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f , ~ I ~ , , I ~ _ _ I ! ; ~ : ~ , i ~ F - 1 ; ; ~ ; _ ; I J [ ` ` t ~ ~ ~ ~ i r i 1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i i i ~ ~ - i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ i
~ 3 ~ - i ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i i j.__.. ~ ' ; ~ ~ ; : ; ; ; ~ ; I ~ p, ~ i ~ , ~ J ~ - ~ ; , ; t ~ ; ~ ~ u , , i ~ ~ ~ , ~ , , ~ , I ~ t~ , , , ~ ~ I 1 Q~- L-' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~a~l `I 1 ~ I 1 I r~ ~ ~ ` ~ f 1 i 1 I 1 f ~II~ T`
~ ~-I i ~ ! I I ~4 I ~ 1 I V 1 ~ i i ~ 1 ~ r^ ~ ' i I 1 i I ' ( ~ f~~1 ~~a ~ - ~ ~ ~ f ~ f 1 I ~ ; 1 I 1 1 . I 1 l I y ~ ~ ~ r . ` _ - I i ~ 1 1 I ~ 1 ~ k 1 1 1 I ~ ~ ~ I ' l . e~ - - ~_E~, ~ ~ , , , ~ , ~ ~ ; , ~ ~ ~ , , , i l ~ F ~ ' ; ~
~ - ~ _ s - f _ , _ - ~ ~ , ~ ; , ~ ~ ; ~ , 3 ~ , , . , , ; ~ ~ , ~I~ ~--I , - ~ ~ - I . , . , , , I ~ , ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ' f ' ~ . - . ~ i i ~ r ~ r ~ ~ ~ I ~ - ~ I i i ' i ~ ~ ~6 i ~ i ~
- ~ ~ - ° ~ ~ - " ? ~ _ ~ , ' i ~ ' - - „a: . _ a, _ - ~ ' + . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ # 1 ~ ! I 1 f- - -m - -t0 - - - ' ~ ~ I _ _ i , ~ , ~ , i-m^-~ E- ~j-~-- ~a - _ =m 41 ~ i ~ , ~ , E . ~ , , ~ ~ . E - . . . ~ -i-,~- ~
4 ~ 1--- - - ' - - - - - ; - - - ; ~ ~ I 1 ~ , ; ; ' ' il i~~ s7 ~ - - - ' ~ - f~ --I f I - - ' , - - - - ~ I - ~ - - - . ~ _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ - I . , _ _ ~ _ , , ~ =.~I ~ _ _i` _ - _ ~ ; - - ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ , i r - - ~ - - ~ -I ~ ~ - ~ I- , ; , --f - ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ r ~ - -I . . ~ 1 -OB~ , f' _ ~~.5Q7,~ ~ ~ ' `I ~ i i ~ ~ ; ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ { I - - ' . i _ ~ r~ ~ _ I li~--~ r
rit-{ - - ~,~.i~-~ , ~ - ~ ! - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' ' ; ~ ~ ~ ~.-_nr ~ , ~ ' I ~ : ; ; , ~ , , - , , ~ ~ ! i°-• i , i i ~
~ I-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---f ~ n~ s ~ - # E f ~ ~ i ~ , - , ~ ' ~ . . _ ~ ~ _ ; 1 ' ; M ~ ~ a-x ~ ~ ~ ~ l I, 1' ~ , f ; ` ' " i + - ~ I ~ , - ~ - . ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ! ~ ° ~ , f---! , ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ 1 ~ a~-~ ~~---o!
~ ~ i ~ ~.~.1 ~ _ ~ ~ - , ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~i ;-~--4 , , , ~ ~ . _ - _ _ t + ~ ~ ~ ~ - ; i _ _ ~ - _ _ , • ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ - _ ~ I , ~ , ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ , ; , , , , ~ , - -r _ _ _ =
_ ~ _ ~ ' - ~ W I ~ i---~-- ~ `1~]~.~ i _ - i - ' ; ' ` ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - - - I - - 1 ~ - ~ - - - - - - ~ 1 ; ~ ~ , I ~ , , - ~ ~ , i ~ I a ~ •
-4 - ' - ' - _ - . _ _ _ - , ~ , ~ - - - ~ - 7_ _ F - ~ ~ ~ -1 Y ~ _ ~ ! ~ , , , . , , . I ! i-- a - ---i-- i - ~ , ~ , - ~ ~ , ' S , , ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ . _ _ _ _ , ~ , I ~ , t ~ ~t.._. _ . - T---I , 1 ; ~ , , 1 : , ~ ~Y 1
~ ~ , ~ - ~ _ ~ ° _yu ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , , ~ ; ~ ~ - _ - _ __.1 , ~ _ ; . f ~ _ _ . u . 9 ~ ~ , ; , . , ~ ~ i , ~ , - ~ - , ~ . , _ . . , , ~ , ~ , i i E~ ; - L ; , ; ~ ; ; ~ ; , ,
~ : ; ~ -i ~ t---, - , , g _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ F-~ ~ i , t-- , , ~ _ ~ = - - -t . , , ~ i , . , _ _ . 'LI 1 ~ - I L~ ~ ' ~ - - i ~ _ _ ~ e - I i i i i i i _ ~ _ ~I , f ~ , I , . . ~ , ► , ~ , , i ~ , , ~ ~ - ~ - - - ~ ~
~ ' ~ - ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I k r L ~ _ ~ ~ { _ ~ 1 ir~ i ' - ' ~ - ' ' S I ~ i i`~ f E ~ ~ ~ h~-- ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , , , 1 , z ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ F--~ ~ ~ - ~ _~s ~ I , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , r ,
~ E { ~ ~ ~ . ~ - , ~f , , ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ I ! I ~ I-• f= ~ I ~ ~ I 1 I r ~ I 7 I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 l 1 ~ 1 1 Y ' . t~-^ '_.o~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 fr ~ 1 I~~ I 1 ` 1 ( ' ~ I ! I r~
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ 7~ 1 Y i I 1 ~ ~ I i I r ~ f ~ I i I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ .I y ~ _ _ ' ~ _ ~ _ ~~lt S ` 1 1 1 I_ ~ t _ 1 i 4 ~ I ~ 'F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , f , ~ e ~ ij~ i ~ 1 _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , , • ~ 1 ~
r r 1 r.-~ ~ 1~ _TJ'.~_ ~ _ - 1 fi...~.~ i ~ ~ 1 1 I I 1 ~ I Y ~ . i ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I 1 ~ I ~ ~ i 1' _ I I 1 1 ' ~ . - ~ ~ ~ ` ~ - - - , , , ~ ~-i~ ~ ~ ~ ---E , ~ - ~ 1~- ; r . _ ~ ` ~ . , ~ , _ .~f ~ - . _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . . i . 1--- - , i . ~ i , , ~ , . , , ~T -t°~ ~ , , , ~
~ ~ 7 C ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° _ _ _ ~r~ ~ ~ ~ E i i R t~~ i i r~ i i I . ~ . ~ , . ~ , , _ ; ~ , ~ ~ - 3 r ~ ~ , a _ ~=--E , , , ~ , ~ ~ , ! ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~-k ~ ! , ~ ~ ~ ~ : ' ~ i ~ ~ I I - . _ ~ i 1 i i { ~ i i Y- t I- r ~ , , , ~ ~ R F--~ ~ , f•-F---, i E ~I
; - Z 1 , , f ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • , ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ • ~ 4~ ^ , , ` ; ~ , ! 1~ , f 1L ' ~ --I ' ~ 1- 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1F ~ ~ ~ 4~ + ~ 7 I 1 I 1 5 1 , i I 1' I ~ i ' -5 ~ ~ I M~ I
• ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - . 1 ~ ~ - ~ . 1 ~ 1 I Y I ~ 1 ~ 'S F y _ I _ I ~ . . . . ~ . i . i . ~ ~ ~ . . f ~ : . Y , ~ I - I I 4 -I ~ - - . . . . . _ . ' " r}''~ _ " . . . ~ ~ ~ G~ ,
~ ^ ~i{ / L1~ LGl ~--f ~
~ i
} ~ , , . , ~
' ~ ~ . - - ~
~
~or~~ SEC. 33 T 25 N. R, 44 E.~dM ~ 5T~ 2'14 B9 TO 51 ~ 49 LT
COiVSTRiIC? AFPRCJf 1SD L f~ MI FEI~L IM~CLI~fM4 4 2Df1. MfI~GE G4Tf A1 LOCAT10~1 FAVE TR,~ TO Bf DET~R~iIHfD 0'f Fl~GIkEER
ave ao~o ~o+CH
~ ,~w nwr~a ~n't+~etrr 5TA.31+OQ d ~ 3Ca~E Ct11f9iF1lCT ~B e 58 Ci.A89 ~ I y2C MpR2. SCltED!!LE R C,M 1 MRTH F~ 5~ VEFi~ aLE r r~. .
_ _ r r ~4YE ~ ~TIdnS" i '
~ RF.~sOVE ExtSTlNG OAI~GE RlPE IPIYERT TP ~ ~ - - - ' ~ _ lEd 20G1
~ ~ ~d x ~ ~ tIGFtT OF WAY HAS NOT BEEN ~GIUIRED ACfiOS5 THIS F'ROpERT'f
T![E +~Ft~ ~ ~~r.~ x .,r `1 ~ 'x.~,~~ '~~.y ° NBTE 10 NOT ENCR4ACN1 .IMITS t?F COPi57RUCTIQH ARE 4 $HOWM
~u o `~-r „ RIGIiT aF wAY NA~ ~ a x~~ L4A~IT5 A4UIRE~ pCA0S5 ~ * r~i~ ssx~ ~ ~Stat~C~~ Do rooT ENCROaCr •rr r~rr•~~r oarxncirsup ~no
f ~ i, k,IMITS Df COH57A a► ~ t p ~ i T ~v - . ~ SAP1D5 ft~aD aS SHOwn uenosiwrinu rrtaerro~iur
, 1 r ~ ° T p'~ ~ ~ SEE SPEC~A[. PRQ~ ~ , ~ q f ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' , i , IMFORMAT14N CON( ~ - ~ av~►a~e► ~
' r V~ ~ RUC ON QV -0^ ~.,ti ~ - _ CQNS7 TI . RR I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' STA ]2+2] r f~~ , ' ~ i " - caos~ucr ie"~ sc` c~asa ~
f, - • ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - St►t~QUIE 4 G1tP IYIiM ~ - -
st~tove cQnasabaa. . 'ra~a . ~ '~►e ~ ~ - ~ "'~ar ~ - - ~ - ~ y~ ~'`j ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ ,
~ ~ ~ re ~sr _ ~ - I
, ~ \ r , ~ ~ ~r~ ~~e~r ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~~c 2oozra
, r - - ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ 1
~ ~e ~~r~ - ~ }cti~~~aa cria~ . ~ ~ y E ~~t -
d a ~ ~ C $P ~ A 29 + 23 R~ a r~~ ~ ' r F~ 1~
` w _ ~ b ~n~ ,R n Ifi8,52,' ~ ' 1 { ~It~~39' ~ , C~UNTY
►~T~ - L = fBS,9~ ~ TkE p~IST11A7 ROAUWAV ~ TNAT FALLS ~E OF
TF~ COlt$TiAUCTip1J AREA IS TD ~ aBLITERpTEO 6 ~ ~ .
RE9laPED 1D BLENfl ~0 ~ A {~►TURN.Lr MYTN T~ u V~~ I V~ Y f1(15TIN0 TEARAkI ~ - fy ~ ~ ii
r a ~ 1~ f ~ ~ SF
P ~ suRV~YeA. 4~ 4 ~ ~ OWE CA~I !~lIJ,4V~ER ^
Q~ avr~►o~p ~g~ ~4•HR ~f~TICE RE: !!!?:D
U~~ ¢ SM~ COUP7TY ROAD PRO,IECT Na. 1596 ~ saNDs RoAo
~ - -r - - , - ~ ~--1 = - ` --f ° ; ---C _ ~ _ - . - - _ _ , . - - -
, ~ _ r= - _ _ - -.~-1~- , _ , - - .s . _ _ _ _ - _ - ~ _ - - a- - - ~ , . _ , r. _ _ _ ~ - _ _ . - - 1~ ~ , 3 + i - ~ - - ~-r - . I- . t ~ I , ~ - - - - ~ ~ - _ f-=- - - _^.L_ ~ _ - - - - OFFICE CJF I
, - ~ - - - - - ~ - ~ ~ - - - - a = - ~ _ _ - - - . "i ~ ^ - - - - ~ - - - - - ~ ~ - _ _ .m- + - _ - ; ! f~-: _ _ - - ~ ~ - - _ ~ i r = - - - - - - - _ . . _ ~ , , ~ - ~ r-• . _ . _ - - - - - - - - - COUNTY ENGlNEER sPOxANE couHrr~ wnsH I
' - - - ~ - - - ~ ~ - ! - I f , - - - - - - ~i - ~ ~ - - - W~~ _ °_~Y_ _ _ _ ~ _ - F - . ~ - . _ , ~ E _ _ ~ _ - ~ - - ~ W _ 1 , r - , - - - ~ _ . . - - - - - - -7 t - suRVErM QEr- isvs
~ i ~ F ~ - - s ;~e _ ~ _ ~ - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - _ ~ - - - ~ - r - - I - _ 9 I~_ i ~ _ -1 . . _ ` - _ . I~ - _ _ - - - ~ _ - - - ~ -m- , .~r . . ApPtovM a~'} ' $FpRANE CQINTT EMGT;w_I4o
; E ~ - ~ _ _ - . ~ - _ - - _ _ - - - -I~ - ~ - - ~ - I--1=--, --~I-•- , . .Y - f ~ ~ . . - 1~ - Y.~_ - ~ _ _ _ _ - - - - s~EET 7 oF 10 swEEss
C _ _ . _ _ - ~ ~ . . ~ - ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ i e ~ . ~ _ 1 -I'~ ` Q ~ - ~--t- ~ - - - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - I - ~ . . . ~ i - ~ ~ _ _ ~ - - ~ ~ - _ ~I - ~ . ~ ~ ~ T.- ' _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ i j 3 ! ~ 1 ~ ~ _ _ - ~ ~ - ~ _ - 1 ~ I~ ~ .
' I ~ al l ~ - _ _ - 1 ~ ` ~ , l ~ _ ~ . ~ ~ _ ~ W ' - ~ ` ~ . _ 1 ~ - I~- ' ~ _r` ~ - ~ ~ . - - • - - ~-h- A J+- -o f ~ ~ - - - - ~ - , ~ - ~ _ _ - - - - - ~Q~ - - --6 ~ ~ _ . ~ - - - iT 3 ~ ~ 1
- ~ I--t-~ ~ ~ , , -F--~ , ~ . _ ~ ~ k ' - - - - - -Wi- - _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ - - _ - ~ .~ta i ; ~ ~ ~ , i ~ R . ~ , , ~ , I . ~ ~~I~ # _.I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ _ ~ r - - _ - ~ - , ~ E _ ~ ` - - - ' ' i _ - - - -
- ~ ` _ - - - - , ~ ~ I ~ i ~ , ~ ---1 ~ ~ , ~ I~ " - ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ J ' I , ~ ' _ , ' . . - ~ . - ~ l - - _ ~.i ~ ~ _ . - - _ ' - ~ ~ - I ~ ; ' I - - - - -i - _ ~ ~ f a n - ~ ~ ! ~ ; - - - - - - - _ . _ - - - - - L k~-
_ ~ - _ ~ ~ i~ - - - •r ~~I ~ r ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ A _ , , 3 ~ #y"' - a-
- ~ - _ ~ ~ _ - - - - - ~ . ~ , i t _ - i- - r- ~ ~ f - ~ ~ ~ 1 f~ ~ . - - - , , , ~ ~ ~ I ~ l-_ ,0 f ~ ~ _ ~ _ - ~ - - ~ z -~.~+~1 ~ ~ YqpI ~ j }L.._ ~ , ~ y ` - - . - ~ - ~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ r IT .r _ - Y . I ~ ~ ~~'Y ~ 1 I 1 I l - - I ~ - -~t-~'-~
~ 7 ~ 3 + [ ~ 1 1 1 . ~ ~ i i f i Y + + ~ _ _ j -l . . - ~ . - ' ' I ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~^I I 1 - 1 ~ I. ~ ~ i~ • p . 1 I 1 ~ _ ~ If- I - - f _ - ~ I u. ~ . I~~ ~ I T I 1 1 1 . I . I ' I f ~ ~ I I _ ~ ~~f~~_~~ -~.~~.T _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 E -I - -1 , s - ~ ' - _ ~
; _ _ _ + I . ~ i I-I . I I ~ ~ ~ , r F ~f-~ f r E---►- r , , i - , _ ~ ~ ~ , - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; F- - - ~ V"' I - - I _ ; ; - _ E i - i ] j J ) , y~ _ ~ , , { ; ; ~ , - ~ - ~ ..'~.~1 ` ~ _ 1 _-1 ~ ~ } 1 ~ 1 I 1 _ [ I _ ~ I ~ ~ I
~ ~ F r y ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ i 1 I ~ ~ Y G~~~_ [ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I I ~ 1 I ~ • ~ ~ ~ 4"~~ i ~ I ~ ~ t ~ i i i ~ i ~ ~ 1 "~y~ ~ . y _ ~ r ~ _ i. ~ . i - i . - . k ► ; , ~ ~
~ ~ I~~~ 1 Y + ~ I 1 i 1 ~ ! I I l _ ~ ' 1 I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 f 1 ~ o~.~ _ I y 1 1 1 1 1 1 i Y ~ 1 ~ 1 l` I Y ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~l C J ~ rI ~ 1 I 1 1 I ~ 1 I ~ f 1 ~ F I...~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ f i~~ f ' I I 1 A ~ r~ 1 1 r ~ ~ 1 I ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ i I . 1 ` I 1 { ~ f . ' ` ~F~_~ I w~~~ ~
y ` ` ~ ~ . ~ ~ L i I ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ Y I~I I ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ 1 i I 1 Y 1 ~ I ~ ~ I I 1 ;I ~ ~ ~ 1 i I ~ ~ - I i ~ ~ T" E I I Y I 1 1 1 1 Y ~ Y 1 ` 1 Y 1 ~ ~ 1= ~ ' ' ~ T r h 1 ' . i . i I~- r I ` ` I ~ 1 1 . I ~ ' . E : ~~r_-- - -
F T I.-- + ~ ( I . . i 1 1 1 Y ~ 1 I 1 I I 1 3- 1 1 ! . I I 1 Y I 1 1 ~ ~ Y 1 I 1 i 1 _ I I , I 1 V f . i _ il 1 Y . Y I ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ M {rr ~ ~ . r Y ~ ~ . ~ ~ Y Y 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 I 1 ~ L 1 ~ " I I ~f 1 ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ Y ~ I I 1 Y r I 1 1 +
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , _ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , i . , . , , - } ~ ~ . i ~ 1 ~ I ~ 7 1 ~ ~ ~ _ 4 ~ 1 ' 1 I 1 {r Y i Y +r f 1 I I_ 1 1 +Jr ~ ~ I 1 1 ~~Y I ~ ~ I~ I ~ 1 ~ 1 I 1 I _ 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I ~ ! ~ -1 -4-~ -
1 I T~ - _ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ . ~ • • ' 1 ~ ' Y . ~ ~ i . , I--C ~ i , . , . . . , . ~ ~ ~ ~ a ro ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , , ; , ~ , , , , ; . , ~ i- ~ . ~ , . ~ ; . ; _ ~ ~ 1 1 7 1 4 1 ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ . ~ , ~ , , ~ ~ ~ , ~ y ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ; , i ~ i
~ , ~ , E - :t ` ~.i;- -~1 s I , ti ` ~ ; ~ ~ f ; ' F ~ ~ ~ --I ~ ~ ~-~q ~ ~ , I 1 ~I f ~ ' ` Y 1 , ~ Y 1 I ~ t 1 ' 1 1 i ~r ._1 i I J 4 h I. J ~ 1 ~ 1 Y 1 i t ! ~ Y ~ I---~-- I~- E ~-f , ~ I 1 i ~ I . 1 f i ~ . ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Lrr . ~ , - - ' _~Q~
~ . , ~ 1 . ; ~ i - - 1 ~ ' + ' _ 1 ~ ~ I L f - 1 1 i 1 a 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _yl 1 I ` I 1 _ l I I , 1 , ~ , ~ - - - , ~ , , ~ ~ , ~ ' ; , i ~ ~ E ~ , ; ~ , ~ - ~ - ~ ~ t yI 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , r ~ , ~ ~ i _ ~ ~ ~~i ~
f--"~ ~ Y ~"1 1 ~ i i i 1-- ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ i i i i ~ y r a ~ y ~ { 1 ~ f i ~ i ~ ~ l + i ~ ~ ~ i ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~_1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ , , A ~ ; ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ . i ; ~ ~ ~ - - - ' , , , ~ ~ ; , i . , ~ . t . ~ ~ I i- I ~ ~ , , ~ -
~ . . , . , , • f ~ , P , r + y~ ` r i , ~ _ . J ~ e I ~~.~~F.'.~...~ . ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ ' 1 ` ` 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 r ~ 1 ~ . • r . ~ ! ' 1 ! 1 A I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I~ I 1 I ' ~ 1 i I 1 ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 t ~ I i ~ ~ I A'_ l ~
1 - I 1 I 7 1 1 A Y I { l I 1 S Y 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 1 ~ y'~ 1 ~ f I~ ~ 1 1 . Y I ~ ~ I I ~ , 1 A~ , ` ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . , . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~I ~ Y ~ . ~ 1 ~ i ~ I ~ 1 I 1 1 I t Y S 1 ~ ~YS 1 1 1 I 1 I l. , ~ ~ f I ~ i . ~ , ~ , , , ; , ~ ; ? ~ ; , t ~ ; , ~ ; r , ~ ~ ; , , , , , , i , , , ~ , , ` ~ . , :
i ~ i ~ J ` ~ i , t ~ ~ ~ ; I~ ~ ~ ; i ' ~ ~ i ~ i ° u ~ i ` ~ ~ / 1 1 I ~I 1 .-I 1 ~ ~ I i .l / I ~ 1 I 1 I l_ 1_ 1 ~ I. 1 1 1 ! 1 ~ I I I I 1 Y L .~t ~ I ~ ~ ~ -~i . ~ ~ i L~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 1 e i i . i r i i 1 k i e i w ~ i ~ ` ~ i , . . . . ~ a . , , ~ 1 i .
~ 1"°' S ~ , ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . , . ~ . . . . ~ . . . , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ii.P RJ1481 iWP¢'~ORR1 ' ,
~
_ : .
y
SEC ~3 T. ~ R,44 E,1~M,
,
~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
acu.e r~ ~i ~r - - - - .
~ r. s ' ~ .
~ ' nalJ*i~ ~r ~ ~ an+« ~T ~ ~ - ~
~ CON.9TRUCT 5TAqGA1~ ~ ~ ~ 1'RUGf 9TAMCAF~ ' W PRE449T fsSkiC GfiYY~RIL ~ ~~y ~ I ECJ~9T COpC. UNYY~EI~ ~ E~CaN 200 W~E ASPf~aLT ~ k~ a`~ Q dSP1UlL.i ~ttffL ~
~ OVTTER FktvE ~H~l aREA vE PDPIGING AREA r 0 ARDUMD 4W, p5~5Hdd~N ~ ~ 0 OW A9 9NOM1SAY ~ ~ ~ w ~ i ~
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~3 ~ ~ ~ li$~C~'i.9 h4pfi, ~ 1~ y ~ ~ ~ Iff - ~
4 ~ ~ ~ fLE~ 2008119 ~ Jr/,~►A~ N ~ a~ q r v, ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ m ~
ti ,r - - - a -f ~ ~ . . • ~ R ' lo ~
~ ~ / ~ / , , I P~ f- _ d , ' ~ s , a a ~ ~ ~
~ W ~,r ~fn~ ~A ~ . ! q ~ ~ ~y ~f ~ a ~ ^ ~ ' ~ , ~ fr ~Q•
Vi - I ~ ~ ip ` ~p h' ~ ~ Ml ~l! eq I~ I r 1 ~NQg 1 ~ e . I , : i ~
/ T P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W / 1 -~,r.k ~ RE71dVG E7t19TIN0 R1Y6:&~HT~ ~ ~.p. < n I ? j w ~ ~ ~ - G.~"'~ - .
J~ m H r F m m ~ i N ' 111 J ~
1 = ~ ~ 'f i ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ rY ' •
Q P' 0~ Q~ ~0 p 'b ~ik,~, r~ ~ ~ y p ~P.~ ~ t~~ ~ 7f ~ --Z~ - - - ~ - - - - - ~y f - -
~ P~
~ 4 sra ~+sa nt ~ ~J d~pp k + ~ STI. 14i00 Rt W ENG d9PHqlT ~~~1 ~ ~ . . ~ r
~ fJCISTIPDO FDA4y~' C0713TRUCT ST+oMWkb ~ a11tt~H rHar Fa.~s aurs~~ ~~EG►9T CQV~ ~RT1Mf1L i C4UNTY ronrE ov rriE c~sra+,crron 8~~~+ t9o wrn~ nsara~r ti ~ , ,
5Et ~..ar~ SfeE~T9 9 AI~A Y5 TO BE OBI.ITERATEO ~n~p ~~G aRE~ Q a 1 TMNOUCN 10 PrON BR~i 8 ii~SHAFE6 TG 61EN0 AA(lUM4 D.Yt AS "3tOw~- I a ~ .p` ~~r{~4 ~ w*~ I BOWDI ~ Y
CANSYRUCI'10~! s NATIIRA~L1' WIFN TtiE piarohl~L G~AhGE E7~STIkG TEiiRAIN a O ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Il1
E~ORE YOU DI~ , 4 ' ~ ~ ~~~6~~F~a ~,4 Y I
~ f. ~rS~gHa4l~~°, SP ~ ti ~ l ~
P K} ~ SuRvErEa a~S ~ I QME CAU. NUM".', arv~vv~~ ~ o ~ l
7d.HR NQTIC~ G.~ E;,,:p ~ 4~
sHFer , ► ~ t i ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-• i- ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ; r ~ , . i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ . ~
, ~ ~ f i - ~ f . I , F ~ ~ , ~ ; _ _ ~ _ , , ! ` i ; ~ ~--i ~ ; ; _ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ; _ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ r , , , , . . _ _ - , ~ ~ , . ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ ! , . , I- ; i ~ ~ i . , . . . . i . , , I { -i ; ~ i ~ ~ ~ , ~ r -f , , , ~ C4UNTY ROAD PRD,lECT No 1596 SANDS ROAD
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ , i ~ , . . _ ~ ~a- _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ; } ! ~ , ~ , ; , ~ I ~ ~ ; , ~ ~ { . ~ , 1 _ ~ _ , ~ I 1 ~ ; ~ 1 ~ . - ~ ~ i ; ~ = I . ; ~ ~ ~ 1 , ~ I = f ~ ~ ~ -i ~l~ ; r ~ ~ ; + ; ; i ' , , , t E ~ , ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ c: •.ir^
Z f I --i--' f ~ ~ I i I 1T _----f ~~-i- I -i f I--i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , I ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ I i i i _ i i__ - ~ i _ ~ i i i ~M i ~ r~ i } _ -T I , -1 _ i ~ i ~ ~ i ~ - -1 i i OFFIGE OF
~ ; ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ i I I -I ~ ~ ~ , a ~-~t ► ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; , , . , I -1 . f _ ~ ~ „ , ; , r' ` ~ ~ ~ - - . ~ , ~ ~ ; f a_; ~ ~ I 4 ° ~ t , - ~ ' 1 - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~rV,br~}►a UNTY £NGINEER
- - _ J ~ ~ ~ 11~'~,' ' ~ ~ y ~ _ , . r 1 Y 1 ~ ' i ~ i 1 I i ~ ~ ~ I I , - h - - ~ , - , f , , ~ l i , , . . ~ ~ p._i ~ _ i i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I ~ - r-~ i ,i ~ i ~ i i i ~ i ~,I ~ _ o i-- ~ f f -t ~ ~ I ~ I I f ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ - I - f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , . I ~SSoryhy4 tSPQKANE COUPI'rY, W1lSM. sUaYCYEo O-Ec IR74
- ' x - ~ 1 - ~ ~ , , , , ~ ~ , ~ m-I t ~tl-' F,i - ~ ~ - ~ _ , ; _ - - _ ~ I - - ~ . , ~ ~ ~f-- F ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 , . , ( 1 1 , I -I--~ -I--I ~ , , , , , . I APPROHE~ ~
' W - - ' i 1,__ I ~ i i ` i ~ ~ i i i i i i + ~ ~ i Q---I - Q - - - ~ `~1' ~ . ' ~ f-' ~ ~ ~ ~ i - - - - ~ : i i i , l i f _ - - - - - ' ~ _ ~ 1 ~ a- ~ - ' - ' ' - ~ , , , E ~ , I SP~09"AHE [CMTY E~
~ F I ~ ~ , ~ , ! , I - , , ~ , f - ~I ~ ~ , ~ _ _ - - - - - - - ~ i i r f ~ r ~ . ~ T.. t~. 1 i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1S'1 I I I ii 1 I I ! I 1 I 1 + I---- I--- ~ [~'ji ~ , ~ ° ~ . _ _ ~ _ i_ _ ` 4 ~ j - ~ ' ~ , f - - - , , , , ~ I I ~ ; f_ ` 14-- h _ i I. ~ i sHEEr e as ia s+~~ZIL- ! ► i- E-- G I -
IL~L ~ ~f. ~ : v ~I ~ ~ ~ ' 1 I 1 I I ~ ~ ~ -r.' 1 [ i i I 1 ~ f~ f"'- i t i ,a~ , . i r 1 i ~"i ~ ~ ~ ~"lT i- ~ i i i ~ r ~ ~ ~ i T ~ i ~ i I k ~ , ~ . ~6- • ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ i i 4 ~ , r t ~ ~ ~ ~ I i i _ _ li N - ~ ~ ' - ~ f ` - ~ ~ - ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~
- F- - - ~ - ~ ~ - I - - - - - . f _ , ~ _ 4, _ 1 ~ I ` - I' - 71 - g}I ~ ~ _ I~ _ _ ' - - - ' f ~ ~ ~ °1_`~_'' ! . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ! -L i i i i ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~
- f • - 1~~- _ - __F- - _ _ _ - ~f - ~ _ --t-- - I ~ j - -1 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ , 9; ` ; ; ~ ~ ~ ` ' L~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ' - _ I i . r _ _ - r. 1 ~ i r ~ ~ - ~ t k I ~ ~ ~ I~'~' - ' ~ + _ ~ _ _ - 1 ~f'_ _ * T 1 If ~ '1" - _ ~I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ r - ~ i ~ E ~ t ~ ~ < < ' ~ ;
~ - - - - - - - - ~ ' ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ; ~ - ~ - I i - - ` - - - - ~---1 ~ 1 f ~ _ f i--- ~ F - - ~ i ~T = _ - - ~ ~ , ~ , ; i , ~ i-- ~ ~ _ 1 ~ _ I ~ r _ ( - _ - _ , < < , ~ , ~ , ~ . -
I ~ ~ , , - - - - ~ - - - ; ~ , . ~ , ~ , I _ ~ i ° , ~ - i i ~ i 1 - ~ -~--I- r--f--t- ti f ~ 3 ~ + , _ . , , , , , , . , , . , ~ , ~ i i. ~ , i i ~ ~ i i ~ s i i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ! i - ^ - ~ # • - - ' - ' " ~ 7 I ~ i i . i ~ i J ~ ; ~
. ~ ~ _ ' ~ ~ s ' " ` • - _ -1-~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _I I I I 1 1 I I Y i I i ~ 1 ~~l I ' - - -l--- - _ _ • - I ~ i I ~ ~ I ~ . , . 1 1• ~ i ` 3 ~ ~ ~ . ,
- f-~n - - - - - - ~ - - . - - I " ] _ - . _ ~ ~ ~ , ~ - ~ ~ ~ , ~ E - - ~ _ ~ - _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ -I , ~ ~ ~ _ ~ . , , , . ~ , . , ~ ~ , , ~ - , - - _ _ ~ _ - = - _ ~ _ _ ; . ~ - - ~l ( , . ~ _ _ _ - i ~ ~ ~ , ~ , f ~ ~ ~ . i I 9 ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ , ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ _ _ F - - - - - ~ - ~ ` ~ ' ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ < < < ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ J l--~ '1 , ~ ~ . - ~ - - - . ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ }1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ I~ - ~ ~ . ~ i} [ F ' 1 1 1 l_. 1 1 1 f 1 ~ ~ . S ~ + 1 I
~ I . I 1 . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i 1 1 ' ~ ' ' 1 _ I ! I I t I } I I I 1 I I 1 I ! 1' " F ' 1 I I I 1 I' I 1' 4 I ~ 4 I a ~ ~ ~ i f _ _ _ '
„ ~ r ~ i i ~ ' ~ r f ~ ~ ~ ~ . i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ k ` ` r ~ ~S i ~ ~ - - - i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r~ i~ - - i _ i i i i i i i i i i i E i i i ~ r i i , . 1 i---~ - - ~ ~ ~ I S ! ~ I ~ _ + _ ~ L ~ Y_ _ 1 1 1 1 } 1 } I 1 I I f } 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 [ I I I 1 4 I I i l ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I-~ . -r _ 41 _ -1 ~ , ~ ~ L ~
. 1 i i ~ 5.~ o o , r--~ i < < ! i ~ Y - Y ~ - I ~ I ~ i__--_1 ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ I' i 1__ ~-_.1_ -r i ~ ~ ~ ~ i r - l I- ~ , ; ~ ~ ~ I ~ . - - f . . . . . . . . . _ . . . r ~ i ~ ; ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ i ' i , i i i i i i i i, i i i ; i i i r E _i i_ ~ ~ i r- F ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ 5 ~ - - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ i , . ~ F E i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 r~ • ~ ~
N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ --t i i i i i ' i i i i ' i i i i i i i j ~ i i i ~ - r-~ i i i i - ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 l 1 1 r ~ ~ ~ f 1 1 Y 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ = I ~ ~ , ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ - ; ~ , , , i , , , . , ~ ~ , 1~ , ) 1 I I 1 II ~
i ~ ~ I ! ~ ~ i r , , , , ~ ~ ; ; ; : , ~ , i I ~ ? : ; ; 1 , -I--' , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ , I , , I , . . , . . . . . , . . . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ t ~ ~ f ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 J I~ 1 1 ~ 1 I I I 1 i 1 i 7 Y f 1 1 1 1 1 } i 1 4
I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I~~ , Y- - I~~ I 1 i 1 _ ~ 3 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - 1~---+ -I i --~-~-C , , I f-{ C ~ -I ~ ~ I ! ~ { I - f ! I - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ , i , . . , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i I I ~ I 1 l I 5 ~
~ ~ ~ I S ~ f ~ I I-F---, j ~ , - _ 1 , i 1 , . , ~ . . , ; , , f , ~ - - ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ _ , . , , ~ . ~ , , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ , ~ I-~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ T,~ --4 , f { ~ : . , ~ , ' . I . . I ' ! ' i ' ~ ~ , , ~ ~ , . . .
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ S 1. r 7 I e ~ i i ~ ~ ~ Y ~ r I 1 I~ I 1 i ~ _ ~ i i r I + ~ ~ ~i Y S ~ ~ ~ r ~ , ~ i ~ l - - ~ i i i r ~ i i i i i I 4 1 ~ i - i ~ ' . ~ , . . ~ i . ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, , . . , ` , , ~ , , ~ , ~ ~ , , , . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ , , . , . . . , , . . . . I , 1 . , _ ~ ~ 3P
r b ~ n ~i M •
,
~ 1 : ~ 1 1 7 Y 1
1 I 7 i 1 li 1 ~ i
~ ~ .
. . . '7 ^ ^ I.--. ..r - ~ +.w.- + _ - - v _ , e ` . _ . _ - - -'4 n ~ h
~r _ . . , _ "_~._~.:,T r_'•~
' ° - r~ ~ _ --~----x----~z.,,..,,. . _ , - , . . _ . . _ ~ _ - - - ~ • ~ - - - - - _ ~ I . ~ ~ - " _ ~
i ' ~ i ~ i,.~-Q'~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t
~ ' . I SEC ~3 T~5 R~4 EVNM ~ ~ ~ ,
~ , . ~ r ~
. - r ~ f ~ ~ ~A/~v-~ / /
~ 1 ' ~ i APPROXIMQTE ( ~r ~ ~ i ROXIMQTE QUANTITIES
~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ • STRiICTVRE fXCAYATION CLpSS ...,eranw, ni wre R n7 r..
~ ~ ' ' FURIdISH1PdG TINi6ER PILfh6G CRE ~ . ~ j ~ DR~VWG TIpABElt PILING CRE4S0 ~
, ~ li l~ ~ a _ W~ ~ I I I , wI i N STEEL REINF~R~IENT 6ER PILfNG CRE4SOTE 1'FiEATED 384 LF
. a ~ I~ ~ 1 ~ m ~ CQNCAETE CL1~SS A~t ~ ~ ~ ~ N / ' fi ~ ~ ~ i° / ~1PERS'IRUCTUAE PILING CRE4SOTE TREaTED la OhlLY, WENT 2500 _ LB
~I I I ~ / l N Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ I ~ I I F tlf / + ;s ax 1es cuyl
~~°4~ ~ / / ~ / / ~ ~ . ~ 1 I ~ ~ 4 ~ ,
~ ~ ~ J I t / • { ~ r r $d'-Q~ ~ f ♦ _ - ~
GENERAL ~ „ , , „ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~I~ ~ ~ i Alf materlol and aark ~hall ba In ar,cor~i _ ~ _ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ aa,oo~ ~ ~ ~ of Waahfnqlan, Oeparlmenl al, HlqhwaYa, S1an~ &hall be In accnrdance vrith rho requltanf of 1ha, gtato
" / ~ ~ Canetrucllan d~led 1977 ! ! ~ ~ ~ r ~ Eoch plle ~holl ~e Grlv+~ to o dtplh suitf~ f, Htqhw4Yk Sfandmd SPeci}itattone for RoOd od ~ J377
I ~ r~ ~ ae~rinp tap~r~ly o! Thlrlp I~0} lone ~E ~ ; . ~r~ ~ i :n tq a deplh autiidQrrt to devglvpe o minlmm bad '
, _ ~ _ i r_ Unleao atAarwiaa ohawn on Iha plans,a ~ _ m p of If~ controlm !o tho }oce o} anX reinlorccmd (r0) Icna rn on Iha pfans, aantreta tom meoaured 14om 1Pro iM
er~ ~Ia -a ~ ~ d. a~ra cr e'-~ ,,~rortr~o ~ enroaa ~ ~,ro M All coal In piace c~creta to de cloaa A; if any reintarccmenf bar ahall ba 1 .l- ' L- -I-- A V
~ p Trp~CJIL ~ , ~ n Concrata far #ha Pre CQ6t Girdera sholl c ~u aPVacucx c~,ar~ Rnn. ~nc►,ucm E ~q~ ~.+~-J Pg! a1 rafea~o and~a 29 ~ay mfnimum atrenqtf , , ~a SI~A 91RUCT1&IE IT4lA ~7 t a
i ` , a , ~ ~ c~o~o e n~nair wn PLAN ~ 6 ' a Qlh 01 dacA ~ ~ Qet Girderii shall obiom o minrcnun vtrengM of 4000 mfnimum Bfrenqth of 5000 PSI
, SCaLE I~~ i0' Q e ~ l ~ . ~ m
~ ~ ' ~m ~r v ~ ~ t W ~ NARII ~ ~ac,,nar~ ~ H
R~ ' i0 ~ niG~ C~P ~ 9 ~ ' . -
~ a t~i - 0 ,~+~r i i ~ ~ z ~ ~ i ~ 8~ 001TC1A . . 6 m IA I ~ i
t ° u+~ ~~+y~ , { i y . ~ i ~ W aSfS f ' _ ~ - ~ - - '
~ W a pw ~ ~ ~ a aJ r I 6 1d ~1W yl qw / I
~ i... I - ' .r' ao9E " ~
~ ~ ' ~ - ~ . . ~ ~ ~ J ~~i ~ 14_1 , J,A_a~ . ;
~ ~tr~'rn-n ~r~r Roc~ar ~do olora~~an ~r, a++o , _p I ,
- , I I I I I 1 I~ l I I I dano ~anvey and aro ~Z tact _ ~ ~ I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I b~ o~ofda ~ , ~ m . ~ II I I
! 1 I I P~'~"~' ' ~ ` ~ I 'I II II 'I f~ ~ + J"' ~ „ i II ~ ~ a , ~ ~ I I " ; ~ p
~ ~var~oN ~ ~ I I 1 _ ~.-1 ID b i
a W - u ' ~ • a a AQp p1 ~9TTQti
i ~ pNy Y ~ W h~ ~ ! I
' i ~ ti ~a ~ 0 Po N ~ e ~ MI W =
° ~ d}. ' w N ~ u r ~ C ~ i
~ ~ _ ~
~ , h ~ , , , i, s{T~aa . 4• ~ ~ ~ ~ q
.r h r p ~ i ~
s ` • 4 D ~ ~1'Q a , . ~ ~ ' , aa~ . o_ ~ , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ co~~r~ ~ _ , , r~ . f ~~xr ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , - , ~d~ _ _ ~ . ~ a ~ , , , _
, t ~ ; ~s , ~ ~ I
~ ~ ` ~a paru y, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ti F , r r , ~ , , ~ , - COUNTY R4AD RROJECT Na I596
. ~ ~ ~ uaccs ~ "a. ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ EL~ 2009 s2 0'~ ~~~f ~ I SANdS RO i
' ~ ~ a ~ , ~ ~o~u~Er~T hra2o►i•6 PIER CAP ~ p r 5 d _ , f BRIDGE No 4520
, { d ~ ~ 9~wr a~ouT ~ 8E'tar ; ~ ~ , i ~ ~ a * SCdI~ 1 e 9 O 1E 4dl ~ • APPR6VED~ a r ~ , ~ _ LAYOUT
~ ~aor~ b`~ ' ' f - ' - ~ ~ "~ONAL t ~Y
~ , ~ ~ , BRi nEER ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ OFF[GE QF t " F C4UNTY ENGlNEEF! '4" s I;I
~ ~ . 1 1 f ~ ~ I I I ~ SPUKANE COUMTY. tlYaSFf
~D a , ~ • ~z ' REDUC • ~ PIL1~1G LAYOUT Q~ . ~ a ~ _ r ~ , ~ SCA~E aPPRovEat
~ . . _ _ ' . _ - _ _ - ~ , - - _ ~vis~a~- - A _r ~ _ ~ _ . . _ . .;:r_ _ _ - - . - - - - - aeYe
~ boUPITY ~ a(h 4~"
a$~~
3NE87 A pJr tO SHEETS - , _ , ~
..Yw~~~..~ w ~ y , r . , ~ - ..r_ _~~z- - - - . . ' - - - - - ~ • ' , ' ' , . , , ~ ~ Y
~ i e ' 7 ~ • 1 ~ , . i ~ i) r ~ i e. ~ ~ ~ c' e i ~ . ~ 1 ~ ~ . fi A
y '1 ~r~+ I i~ " r' ~ • ' ~0 ~ ~ ' ~ ! .n '1 ~ ~ ~ - a d 9 1 ~ ~I i d ' i ~ v 6 1 ~ • 1 I~ ~ e 1 r ~ 1 ~ ~ h • }6 {o ~ . Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 v ~A W ) I ~ ~ h. ~ ~ ~ S
y _ . ~ ,l~ ~ ~ r ~1 « e ~ ~ . e y ~ iT 1 ~ . i i i ~ ~ P u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ n ~ 1 N
J r " ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t~ 1 I ry!~~ ` t~ r ~ ~ ~ . ~~1 ~9 a I ~ _ , ,
,.F r .F~ + , I ~ ~ , ~ ~ . , ' ~ y n Z ' . ~ 1 r r + ~ , ti ` 1 I I ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
~ r ~ ~ I i 1 EI Q I+ ' , 1 ~ 4 ~ ~ y I • 1 r n ~ i 1 ~ 1 i ~ * 3 114r-i u" 1 + 4 ;
~ 1 I i I ~ • I i ~ ~ i I ~ i +f
I ~ Y 1 ' l
o ~ ~ P- D~ An ue wnw~tS ~ ~ 1 N ~ K ~ ° t9 •Q +T 3¢ GAbf IsSTA1•A3a61 4A9 9"~ ~
u ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ a
~ _ - 1 b MF 20 Gd4v ! . , ^ , ~ qA ?A1NTE4 PQ5T6 ~
~ ~ , . . ~ I , ~ ~ 5 r ' ' n
~ , - - i c. _ , , 4 p! Il~r~lf` ~ EASH ENQ ` E~~ uo1a1 f
o ,
p ` ~ r~,°o ~ ° ~,6 , , o . 2-?~0 ~ 8i ~9 wnNTS p 0 ` , ` ~ _ ° u~ a~ ~4~~ l~sn+..a'~1
, , . _ . _ ~ ' , o , ~ v ~
° ' . ~ ~ " : ~ ~ ~ TYP_ R~INF4RCING CAG~ A~ EACH END
' ~ ' stn~E ~i` , y~ ~ . . r EACH END
~ ~ i I r I
, l ' BEVEi,fO ~RSHEit- e4"Ay~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ]Aa ~ NEaPREME R40 AT 0.BUT►~HTS 4`-Ip~•
• ' ~ 4~
~ y-I ' " ~'.0 ( 2~-I{? ~ ~ _ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ p ' ~ 1 ~
~ ,3~_~qn~~o~a,~~,~a~.~~-g^ DETAIL a ~ __._.~n rotn U►t+~en ~ ~ , 5Cif~E 3" • 1' '
~ a . Q, i'RI'~ ~x0-4` ~r ' +~~p r+c ~ L
SANDS Ra BRIDGE No ~52Q PLAN , - 9C~LE # e I~ , . ~
~ ~ 9 I i ~ t Y
F3 ' ' , a~i ~u~r~i ~tami A~a~o END CLC1Sl1R~ r 3 r~~~.~~ ' ~ 1 0 d 1 O W Y G f a e d t d i t a e l ~ q t r l i~ n q t a d,. ~~A I~.I'
~ ~ ~ I ~
i
. y ' 2~, ~ O~ SEE QETAiL 9 @ _
~r- I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ N
, , ~ 6 WELO STUDS oi faSN N~~ ~ . * ~ +/~Q~ 'q. 2~ r 2: ~ ICC~t ) aacA end ~ACN EkG
_ ,y v „}'~"~L,•,~ µ ,I ~ V LEv r '
~ d ~ ~ i • E~ t . ~ . , o o a p ` ; . l ~ , ~ ~ ~ w , , .
~ . . w v ~ ~i'~iti ~s g a , ' l ` + ~ N ,P A ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ti lQ 0 2 ~ uMli ~ 1 ,
~ a ~ ~ ° * T~ ~5 - r ~ ~
i d! . • ~ . ~ . ~ ,r ~ ai N! i ~y iy rN ~ 1.
, ~ Rr~o o a o ' 3~~ a° 1 ~ 4 c ~ ~ ~ ,
~ , ~ ~ C.a wRESru[as ' AQ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ 1' a i ,v~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ i Full tENGTF~ OQ . { ~ fiAGI k1B * s i a 6 a- ~ 4 srnaqos~urnr ~ . ~ - , , ~
' " ~+u~~ roacE ~ :~i~n~~y ~ c~Er~ U PART BRIDG ~ - a ~ ' rv i E S~CTI~fd ,
~wa ~ ~ T , ti Sanda RoOd &idgp No 43~ ~ r-~ _ ~M~o~,,,o„ ~ ~ Fa ~°~~~i3f 6CnLE ~
~ , ~ , {a w7 ---~7 • FR.I sE1'Wb► WITd @RID6E GAOU? ~ , ~ ~ g 0~ 1 ~ ~ a ~ ApTfR LEVEIlNG akG WEEl41ilU - ~ . , . ~ , , C4UN7Y R
- , I _ ~ EI.~VaTlON ~ ---s ~ ~ r 1 I ~t.. .~N r Y • u ~ _ , ~ , ~ SIALE I°■I' , ~ ' C4UNTY RpAa PROJECT No 1596 , 'r r .SANDS-RA.-
: ' ~ , s ~ f t1~i~ OM~ Df~l1 , , ~ ~
~`i • • V M1 r ' - y ~1.. A ~ ~e Y`L ! r ~ . , • , ~ ~ , / ~ ~ s, w~to sruas M " J ~'~1 I ° , i1 ~ r f , B~II
' 4 0~ r,~ GJ ` " 1 Y o_i ~ J L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + , , ~ . ~ ° ' , PILES i ~ ' ~ a ~ ~a , j ~ } ~ Z ~ ' t . E ' , 1 ~ ~ ~ f R~~ BRIDGE No 4520 -
~ nwn Y ~ r• , 1~ ~ - ~ ~ r, D y { , ~t ,~:t , ~~r2~'~~ia•n t , . p h ~~r° ~l h 1, I T 3 N~ 9 1. 1 ~ a t ~ J 5 1 ~ t N c. PRESTRESSED UN1T5 i
~ J 4i.y e ` ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ryI ' ~ y v e' ' l c6 tl~a ' p 't 14 1 N' VCU1 y i ~ i ~ 6 ~ G f ~ ° r ~ ~ ~ti .7P (7FFICE QF • , . , ~ COUNTY ENGINEER , 5POKANE COUNTY. WA$H e M ~
, ~ f. , , ~ ~ ~ t - : ~ • ~ ~ , , W~LD TIE aETAIL ~ E f 1 ~ s ~4,~ 4 ~ ' , • s a . , ` ^ DETAIL E a i ~ , ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , , , ~
~ ~ 1 ~ . E , a ' L°'1 . ' ~ ~ ' ` " `;~i~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 7!'ALC 1 ~ ' I n~ ~ ApPFiaYfa . r ~ . n , ~'ti ~ g y~ , T 1 I . . APPRdvEa DATE r- ~~-7~ , 1 1
4 i ~ e . y . , -'7° , , > ~ K ' ~ ~ ~ 1 i f i c ' i ' H i " r ^ ~ o' ` ' ~rA • ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ I - ° ~i~ i ~ti ~ ' ~ ` ' I 9RIQG'c ~NCtHE~R ~f: ~ y •r~n
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . G ~ 7 i~ r ~ s ~ s , e ~ ~ , ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ n. fn y~' t ~ ~ i , ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ b
' ~ • . , ~i . y ~a~ . t, q A.J ~ ! ~ I ~ : ~~p1 rti ~ # { I i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ f ~Oh ~ i~ 1 ` 1 , • • 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , r , _ ~Q~41t; ~ ~ ' i I ~ r "~y ~l CGI/NTY RaA~ ENGI
~ i ' ' ! , . . . , ~ r 7 I , ~ C " " ~ ~irti i td~i•..+~~'I , ~ }rrl ~ .1, ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ R~~ISIQM IOAT ~ Y14 HI 'd
kt y~~ ~ r ~~E ~~r,„ i-~ ~,*p e ~y~~~ ~ ° 1) 1 f S ~ PPROYED~ $ ~ i f~, ~ I i~~oi YiIL f. + ! ~ Lr~~ ! dr r y ~ ~~iSl~''j~ ~ a~< <~ie ~r t~i^f. ~~'~e _ ~ e t ' 1 t, 1 . , 1 , f,~ ~ f ~~$HEET ttt Cp Ip SHFEtg . _ ~ ~
fl ' ~ ° J~_
~
Inlanid Asphalt
.
.,yc . ~ ,•.,,i
~ ~a s t. r ~ a~ • ~ ~~'F Yrt
• • ~ . • t s ~~~~s~~~~~ : ~~~~~~~i • • ~ • . ~ . • • • • • . • s ♦ ~ ♦ • • • • • ~
~~33 ~Lb ~ a . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . : : . . . _.w. ~ .
~ /.svE ~ 33 t2r~ /~vE, : l - . . . . .
~ , _ _ . . . - . . - • ~
3 4 T 1-t ~ : • Av e. t ' o. .
Y!
, . ; . . . . , • • ' •
~ ~ 34 T : • • • • • ~a ± a21iiU'~s'i1:L• . : . ~ ~ , , ~
3sT1-a ~VE. ;c N ; ~ , Z ~ ~
y1 • . . . . . . 'v ' : ~ .
~ W , 3 : ; .
71 • ' ►-4uLe D ; . °
~ ~ ~ • ~~ok~ ~o
. cT
GT. tf1 : v J
/1YE al ~ - • . . :
'Q . . . . , ~ - • _ ~ 3T TN '
~ J 3TZ';-i a AvE ~ 3~~a' t+ ~
-.L4
~ • _ oa
~ ~ ~
E: oT" ~ ~40TH /SVE.
- ~ - ~ ~ - - 33 - - . - • - , _ . .
.
~ •
s ' •
:
o t.,,C 42 ~ 9r~ ~
: ] .
' : ~ ~ ~l~ ~ efl > Q .
Ci; : . ..J W Z I ~ • ~ ~
` ' f%71Cl ~ ~ • 45
0
S ~
.
G ~ :
r-J ~ ~ • ""i ~ r
~ a2o ~ ~
I ~
. : .
Aro, z r - '
a.` C4aEST~2 , ~ ' • .
- N 7 ~ I
CEM 6 t S
- , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ fiond
'
. _ G
I' • •~ir 1 . ~ ~ I
~
i '.t ` ~ " •
. ,
U ` ~ ' ° •
AvE C9 ~ C, ~ L•
W
3. ~
ai~ ~ ~ • O ~
~ • .
di ~
47TU ~
~ ~ ' • L
sa = ' ~ ~ .
FEkNET Lq
` •
1jy• `1~1y1i~ ♦
y
~ kQt a ' G . i C'izeE
Q t ~ a,R ~ E
-
~ -
.
KL:
~
pppppp ~ • ' ~ {r T~, 1=y/ r , ~ • ~ . t
'I~ ~ ~•S ~ ~,'T,cl~,~;_ '~'i, «-x, ,o y ~ ^ ~ .
~
\ I ~r~~ . ~ 11 i ~
~c Access
~ r ' d . . • ~8 °
~
(,S- ~E~
Y~~--
~ ~ - - - - - - - ~ 10 1 ' ; , ~
sn~r.?~~:~
~ /IZ 70 f I ~ II •1~ I I,~J~~j~~J~"' 1 ~ ~ =~r~. ~i~ ' ~,1 '
p ~~,,r~~,~ 1'~`.:.~. ~ ~~`%i ~~J~, ; ~ ~ . . gr~...~_, . N '
2 7 ~
, 1 \ 0p . nn ..r a
\ fo ~ r ~ `n~,~,]'~I•:~: ~~~`~~~~/nf~~ ~~w~ r~4"~ ~ ( ~1
'I, ~~t~r~~~ r.~i a ~ ~ ' ~_•L_ t
Q ; r \ C% ~ t%ao~~Lao~tIl S!T£ n~~I~.
jS0 ~ e I '1y~_:.l~l I~l ~•'~•.~.~~'<(L ~ ~:1~• IrJ~
~ _ - c a,o o!i' rt
1 ~ u ^ I il ' I n ~ l -,f
~j-➢~~ ° r
I.e
r~ !
K du/r! , ~ s~c•o~ • ~
; nd p
p
°
~ , ~ 1o ;
T
~ ~ •J: I ~ ~-y / ~ '
, ~ .~v .1 ~ t ' ~ /~i ~ I~ fl ~pt~
VICINITY MAP i
n y , !
I ~1 ` z ~ J
I? ~ '
a ~
r %
, O m I
~ v ~4 i ~ m I ~
Pe- .I~nckr I
't T +e I
y DosS~blt Dainp Clnlardcn9 a` ~
i tlthw a,7d sz~-f4,9 Arem
/ Q (/►'Jay 6 t C~ s ed ~t f m~ So ~
~ (or t~u.rip 4chvi~i~5 ~ ~ Boun~da.~/
l.
. \rM _ _Y I t a
I ~ ✓ , y rr. co ~ - - - - - ~f
r
~ 4I , ~ ~ ~ • I
q 1
fxisA,/)
Chrs kr '
'b ~ ~and f ll ~ ~ I
~ ~ • ~ I
~
/ y
~
TABLE A
I/Y r ^
Existing Zomng UR-3 S • o l N BQ•s. o, s9. I
Proposed Zomng RR-10
Total Area Approx 5 5 acres
Buildvng Caverage Approx 60 sq ft [NLAND ASPHALT
Building Setbacks 50 feet from property LANDFILL - SITE PLAN
Type of Landscapmg Existing penmeter screen►ng tiCALF I" = 100 SI:C li, 1 wN 25, R 44EWM SPOKANE, COUNTY
'j ~
~
FiECE VED
BEFORE
THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII.DING ANWA440
81'OKANE COUMY ENGINEER
IN THE MATTER OF AMENDED CONDITIONS ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
OF APPROVAL AND RENEWAL OF ) CONCLUSIQNS AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUE-1-96 ) DECISION
THIS MATTER, is a change in Conditions of A proval and renewal of a Conditional Use Permit,
pursuant to Spokane County Zoning Code, on the 29~h day of September, 1999
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1 The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
the decision by the Director of Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
2 This amendment consists of updated Conditions of Approval to the Spokane County Hearing
EYaminer's Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision of August 26, 1996 In addition, the
appltcant has requested renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the inert waste landfill
3 The existing zoning of the property is Rural Residential-10 (RR-10), which was the subject of an
approved zone change, ZE-13-96
4 Those agencies having a potential interest in the Condrtional Use Permrt were notified and
comments solicited Updated conditions were recommended by Spokane County Division of
Engineering and Roads, Spokane County Division of Engineermg and Roads - Transportation
Engineering and Spokane County Division of Utilrties - Stormwater Uhlity
5 All previous Findings of Fact and Conclusions specified m the Spokane County Hearing
Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision of August 26, 1996 still apply
DECISION
Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact and Conclusions, this amended Conditions of Approval and
renewal of CUE-1-96 is hereby APPROVED for three (3) years, specifically until August 26, 2002 All
conditions imposed shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of
the property, heirs, assigns and successors This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistent
with adopted appeal procedures
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
All previous imposed Conditions of Approval specified in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner's
Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision of August 26, 1996 still apply, together with the following
updated conditions
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLAi'ViNWG
2 a [Amended] A renewal request shall be submitted by July 26, 2002, accompanied by the
appropriate fee Any advertising costs associated with renewals shall be at the expense of the
applicant
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
11 [Added] Dedication of 30 feet of right-of-way for the extension of 44th Avenue is required
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES - STORMWATER UTILITY
1 This project shall meet Guidelines for Stormwater Management (GSM) as amended in April, 1998
Approved the day 29th of September, 1999
,
„J' TODI7-
Planner
~ Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the nght to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing EYaminer. If you destre to file an appeal, you must submit the appropriate Appeal
Application together with the required Fee, payabie to the Spokane County Division of Building and
Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed Upon receipt of a
complete appeal application, a public hearing will be scheduled
If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building and Planning at 477-3675
c Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
Spokane County Division of Utilities-Information Management
Spokane County Division of Utilities-Stormwater Utility
Spokane County Fire Distnct No 1
Spokane Regional Health District
Inland Asphalt Company
Findings and Decision CUE-1-96 2
poka ' County Public Works,
• • • a • g • Section,
/ • • ounty Eng . . •
Memo
To John Pedersen /
From Scott Engeihard ~C'4 ..e
~
Date 08-02-02 ~
Re CUP Renewal for CUE-1-96
We have reviewed the above referenced application and have the following comments to make
conceming the apphcation
Applicant shall dedicate the applicable right-of-way for 44' Avenue to curve into the Thorpe Road
alignment This dedication shall occur from the existing 44"' Avenue stub, which serves the proposal on
the west boundary and extend south and east to the railroad nght-of-way The applicant shall
coordmate with the County Engineer's Office to determme the exact locabon of the right-of-way
_ dedication No roadway improvements to the aforementioned right-of-way are required at this time,
circulation needs wdl be determmed during future review of development applications
p• • ' County Public Woilks,
. • • . • • • Section,
Divisio • ounty Eng . . •
Memo
To John Pedersen
From Scott Engelhard
Date 08-02-02 ~
Re CUP Renewal for CUE-1-96
We have reviewed the above referenced application and have the following comments to make
conceming the application
Applicant shall dedicate the applicable nght-of-way for 440 Avenue to curve into the Thorpe Road
alignment This dedication shall occur from the existing 441hAvenue stub, which serves the proposal vn
the west boundary and extend south and east to the radroad right-of-way The applicant shall
coordinate with the County Engineer's Office to determme the exact location of the nght-of-way
dedication No roadway improvements to the aforemenUoned right-of-way are required at this time, -
circulation needs wdl be determmed dunng future review of development applications
• • • ' County Public Works,
. • • . • gineering Section,
/ • • County g ' e •
Memo
To John Pedersen
From Scott Engelhard ~Date 08-02-02 Re CUP Renewal for CUE-1-96
We have reviewed the above referenced applicabon and have the follomng comments to make
concemmg the application
Applicant shall dedicate the applicable right-of-way for 44' Avenue to curve mto the Thorpe Road
alignment This dedication shall occur from the existing 440 Avenue stub, which serves the proposal on
the west boundary and extend south and east to the railroad right-of-way The applicant shall
coordmate wrth the County Engineer's Office to determine the exact location of the right-of-way
dedication No roadway improvements to the aforementioned right-of-way are required at this time,
circulation needs will be determined dunng future review of development applications
PAGE 1 10:04:13 31 JUL 2002
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log ?nro..........
04415 SANDS RD (START) .000 CORNWALL RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 20
SANDS RD .920 CAMERON RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 18
SANDS RD (END) 1.290 VALLEY CHAPEL RD R 09 GRAVEL 18
04416 SANDS RD (START) .000 VALLEY CHAPEL RD R 09 GRAVEL 12
SANDS RD .070 END GR.AVEL/START DIR R 09 GR.ADED/DRAINED 12
SANDS RD (END) .560 BAKER RD R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 12
04417 SANDS RD (START) .000 SOUTH END TO ELDER R R 09 GR.A.DED/DRAINED 10
SANDS RD .500 ELDER RD R 09 GR.A.DED/DR.AINED 10
1.540 STOUGHTON RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
1.750 RINEAR R.D (NONESTABL R 09 GR.AVEL 24
2.030 CONNOR RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
2.060 BR 4405 OVER CALIFOR R 09 GRAVEL 24
2.250 END GR.AVEL/START PAV R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 24
2.280 PALOUSE HY R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 24
2.390 END PAVEMENT/START G R 09 GRAVEL 24
2.540 WASHINGTON RD R 09 GRAVEL 24 _
3.550 GIBBS RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
4.350 BRUNA RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 24
5.200 QUAKING ASPEN LN (PV R 09 GRAVEL 24
SANDS RD (END) 5.350 MADISON RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
04418 SANDS RD (START) .000 44TH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 40
SANDS RD .290 BOWDISH RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
.300 BR #4520 OVER PLOUF U 16 PAVED 36
.310 UPRR CROSSING #54331 U 16 PAVED 36
SANDS RD (END) .390 DISHMAN-MICA RD & BO U 16 PAVED 36
04419 SANDS RD (START) .000 DAY-MT SPOKANE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 18
SANDS RD 1.370 HALLIDAY RD (END) R 09 GRAVEL 16
SANDS RD (END) 1.480 WOOLARD RD (END) R 09 GR.AVEL 16
04421 SANDS RD (START) .000 BIG MEADOWS RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
SANDS RD .250 WILD ROSE RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 16
1.260 BLACK R.D (START) R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 14
SANDS RD (END) 2.270 TALLMP,N RD R 09 GRAUED/DRAINED 16
04420 SANDS RD (START) .000 DAY RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 28
SANDS RD (END) 1.270 DAY-MT SPOKANE RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 28
0 4 6 9 8 SAND S RD ( S TART ) .000 4 8 TH AV ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40
SANDS RD (ENLI .040 :17 T14 All (F~TJI iT 19 PAVED 40
8 i-;~~ords Processed
.
OMd~ R ; JOE BASCETTA
p,
812 S D 1 sHmm
SPOKAr~E, Wa, 9 206
.
~ ' ~
' .
~ ~ ~ • LEA DESCRIPTION: (ArlEC&-D T READ)
. Lor 1 LEW1S ACRE TRACTS, AS PIR PLAT
,
THEREOF RECORDED l N VOL.UME „L OF PLATS
~
• X PAGE 35- SITUATE 1N THE COUNTY OF SPOKANL
x ~ STATE OF WASN 1 NGTON, AND
TNAT PORTION.OF GOVERILMEPdT LO 2 IN THE
~ ~
~~ORTH HALF SECT10N 4, T ,Oi~ IP 24 No~r~
' AG RANGE 44 E -W .M ol LY I NG WE T 0 THE
°td RA1LROM AND EAST OF SAr;W ; SITUATE
t N .THE CDUI~TL,4F SPOKAfVEy OF WA ~
.
✓ ` 2 IL ' • jln~ V~ ;
. ~
~ A'~ ~ 20I3 . ' ' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ 1VI ~
~ ~ • ~ ~ ,
/ . . , N
. ~ .
49 ` 1978X o •
- ` ~
. , . ~ Zim
, 20/
. ; , ~
, i \ , , ~ • 1 ,1
, f , ~ \
~ X~ ` ~
jg g
20 .
~
~ 11.. ~ . . .
~ X ~
1 \
~ 206
I '
J
0
0
1 0 ~
Z 4 i
< 0 40e1
W y , . 's~e•
~ ~ ii `40. • - -~Sio _ ~ ~
~ / SCALE . 1 ,
0 ,
' ~►t~ MRT ~
Q OWNER; JOE BASCETfA
0
$12 $ DISHMAN F-D,
; w f 1 ~ ~ -•,~..r. ,i.,. ~ , { SPOKANE, WA, JF206
N
6
C, tn FOREST MEi)Ow M LEGAL DESCRIPTION; (araENDIEn j READ)
ISG
ND ADD ~ ~ LoT 1 LEWIS ACRE TRACYS, AS!lPqR PLAT ,
2
,
THEREOF RECORDED I N VOLUME L OF PLATS ,
s~. 71 1!o
° PAGE 35: SITUATE IN THE COUNnOF SPOKANE
STATE OF WASN I NGTON , aND
THAT PORTIOPi OF GOVERPJMENT LO Z IN THE
NORTH HALF (l ON 4, TA~1N IP 24 NOP.i
i ~ SECTI
RANGE 44 E,WA„ LYING WE T 0 THE
~
RAIl.ROAA AND EAST OF SANa , SITUATE
OF SPOKAN0 OF WA I
ZA"Z OTI 899A
a. _
I~ ~ _ _ Q Q
~ cr ~ , 89 90
u~ s .r e .r s ~ w ~ o O A ~
k ~ ~ TNoaot ~ ofo~. Ro
L076 80.Ac ,
14
S I~W o~ Q I . 5~ ti V►~
>'w ~ z
~ Q a a
R
4c , z $.p
L ~ ~ ~ 1 U1 ~ ~ ~ ~ io~ : ~(03J 1
w
(40
~~.,c.....~..., wv~o ~ ~ ; ~P ~
~ FsTATE s MrRoN Cb
~
No. 5 ESrATES A%.,
a ~
NO,T ' 1 7
96 ~
1 .1
J
E
~
ff{
1
M
{
~ x $ - ~
* ~ ~ ~
g_ ~ ~
~ 9 ~i ak&~ $
t 6 b B 8 a.. b.. ~ } f 5 A~ ~ W s a a ~ x % ~
K
a k l #~A
f
Ri t( £ 1
I
o
1 1
k
i i
s
I
E
< ~
I
f
I I
i
m
t I
I
j
I
s 1
I II I
f _~d {
{ j,. ' \ f f
a
A
F
f
I.
s 1
1
,
~..,.~~~~~.,.m,~.... ,_.e,~ ,.M
~t
j.
x n ~ t ~ may:
v: ~ ~g r ~ A~: ~ n
e 3 a 1 _
r c
. P, y, R' i - , ~ p .a e .
H ~ ~ 0
_ s
,
,
k ; f^
.n :i5: ,
<
Y.. E ~
. , . . ~ a
.s.
- tr
3. m r ' ,3k
~;k..
~ ~ ,g, e n k
-
-j x^t . Y'
..:.r. ~ ~ 'a r ' e ~kl ~ a.. cis V. 7
X i . r. 1 ~ i f
~ i .r: ~ _
y ~ ~ e . p r ~ 1 q....
P ~ ' f i~ ..S t ~ .ry q~ & , n
a' r r ~ ~ .,a
n
F:. N ' ,R, •s , ~ ! ~ Y... n ,.f. x
a. ~ x.
s:. a.. y R.. a
' f' m
y~.. S ~ ~
i
~y~
3,. ..w.
' 'u.~ n4
k ~
k
e
k
i
F
I
s
1
f x
' ~ ~ t
._i_
°i
_
1
i
C~
C
~ ~
m
f ~ o~~ k
gyro- , €
i
I
t i ~
5
_
. . . . .
J
~1
4
i
t
t
r t
~ jjI t
t
I i I
I
t
d
J
.m
7 3
s
s
3