The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-15-86 5 ~3 5_~y o ~ ~ ; ~44 0.s,' -A` ii COUNTY ENGINEER ' _ ~ _ ° ~ , ~ ~-.,~•__.c t~* ; ' t~- , 3~.`i~;L~~'~ s-Tr• '~~?L~ -.~F` RO BERT S TU RN ER j .n q 4~~~ S~ ~~...1 14a~t il ~ ~ l/,If, : 1 ~ COUNTY ENGINEER ~ . . r.= y _ .r itDa~~s.~.e 0~`3'.~.~~g~e➢~Qme 99260 ~ .°iP0'tANt. Ci Lr', CJI . HOJSC ~ 1 December 12, 1986 ' 4 I F t ~ , Mse Beulah Coman f 515 W. Sprague Ave. { Roon 801 i Spokane, WA 99204 ~ RE • ZE 15-86 " Spokane County Zone Change k f Dear Ms. Coman. ; This is a follow-up to our meeting of December 12, 1986. At the meeting ' you had some questions which were related to condition #12 of the Spokane e County Hearing Examineer Committee Findings and Order for the above referenced zone change. Specifically, you wanted to know what use could be made of the ~ property which lies within the designated 40 foot building setback? t t We are of the opinion that the property may be utilized by a developer for landscaping, stormwater drainage disposal, access to the rear of a building for ~ loading and unloading and overflow parking. By requiring the setback it was " not our intent to restrict all uses. We are primarily interested in preserving y a strip of land which will be free of buildings. This will protect the integ- ~ rity of the abandoned railroad right-of-way. Also, we will not have to nego- f tiate for buildings when right-of-way acquisition becomes necessary in the future. ~ , I hope that I have answered your questions. Please feel free to contact ~ me at anv time. ~ Very truly yours, C ~ ` V V,~~'~ r~ ~ r Gary Se /Nel'son, P. E. ~ Planni g Engineer ~ ~ GSN/BMc/lvb ~ r ! cc Steve Horobiowski, County Planning ~ ~ ~ Public W'orks F3uilding North 811 Jefferson Street 1--lpokane, Washington 99260 (;I09)1 456-3600 ~ I% f ;.~L, • kf f~.ii~hht6~ . J f tullkghhtbu k~kf / ~ Q ~ ~ v i . \ . t PLANNING DEPARTMENT W ~ ' jS BRQAOWAY CENTRE 6UILJiNG N 721 JEFFERSCN j.TR~E~ TM-+ ~~,j;tj ? r-•h "PHONC 456-2205 = • ~T~ ~ ` - SPQKANE OVASr+INGTON 99260 SPOwANC COUnTY GQJ-IT MQUSC August 11, 1986 T0: Board of Spokane County Commissioners FROM: J~ Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of August 7, 1986. Gentlemen: Cn August 11, 1986, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. io consider three new zone reclassification applications. Members present: Mr. Phillip D. Harris, Chairman; Mr. Ron Odell and Mr. Gary N. Anderberg. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions will become final on August 18, 1985. Al1 Findings and Order for this hearing were signed on Augus t 7, 1986. 1) ZE-23-86, Agricultural and Aqricultural Suburban to Urban Resid2ntial (UR-22): Spokane Valley Church of the Nazarene Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of Mission Avenue and McDonald Road in Section 15-24-44. Proposal: Church, office and residential uses (No Site Plan). Action: Denial. (Vote: 3 - 0) The applicant could not reveal any details about specific future uses of the proposed site, and the neighborhood presented testimony in opposition to the impacts of thA unknown uses upon the single family neighborhood and the immediate area. Without specific details, findings support- ing the change could not be made by the Committee. 2) IZE-15-8-6 ~Aqricultural and Commercial to Reqional Business (B-3): Zaremba . Midwest Location: Generally located south of Sprague Avenue and east of Evergreen Road in Section 2:~-?5-44. . Proposal: Commercial Center. Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) (continued) ZONE kECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 _ SPOKANE COUNTY NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on August 7, 1986, and the members of the Committee present being Phillip D. Harris, Chairman, Ron Odell and Gary N. Anderberge B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Zaremba Midwest, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE-15-869 Agricultural and Conanercial to Regional Business (B-3), for the purpose of developing a Commercial Center. C. FINDINGS OF FACT le That the existing land use in the area is residential9 commercial, storage sheds and vacante 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Major Cormnercial developmente 3. That the existing zoning of, the property described in the appl ication is Agricultural and Comnercial e 4. That the provisions of RCW 43o21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Determination of Idon-Signif icance. 5e That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda I tem have been f u 1 f i 11 ed . 6e That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justifiede 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed approval of the proposed use. lUe The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purposejand will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and weifare. e lla The following are addltional fTndings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Conunittee: a) That the four property owners through their agent, Mro Glen Cloninger9 and Mrse Beulah Coman being present at the hearing have accepted the conditions of approval and have agreed to develop a Retail Center. Piecemeal develupment of the site is not al]owed withln this apprvvale D. CONDITI0N5 OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Commlttee shall be bznding an the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners ' of the propertyp heirs, asszgns, and successorsa) ie That, if proposed development of the site deviates substantia]ly f rom the approved site plan, a public hearing shall be scheduled for further review by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Conr~nitteee ~ 2 ZONE kECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (continued) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT le The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lightingo (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. .A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator wi 11 be permitted, including, but not 1 irnited to the fol lowing changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zonee Al1 variations must conform to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTYo The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. All current standards of the B-3 Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this sitee 5. That the present proposal is not detailed enough to determine whether or not the use of or materials stored on the site are in compl iance with Section 7°06 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY. Accordingly, as a condition of approval9 the sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with the Spobcane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public" which shall provide in material as follows: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILOING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPA(dCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBEO HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY SECTION 7°06 (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE). THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:.aee". 3 . ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOPd NO. ZE-15-86 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendativns concerning _ stormwater runoff and Provlde necessarY landscaPin9 for runoff. i 7e Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RGW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting ~ Ordinances prior to issuance vf building per~nits. ' So That the provisions of SEPA's R10TICE OF ACTION pursuant to ~ Chapter 43e21Ce080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Comnnissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this appl icati on , , a n d pri or tv any on-si t e improvements, or f i 1 e appropriate documents to the effect that the IdOTICE OF ACTION is wai ved i n accordance wi th Spokane CQUnty Comni ssi oners' Resol uti on #82-0458 dated May 4, 1982. ; b) CUUNTY ENG I PdEER I NG DEPARTr9ENT Pri or To The I ssuance Of A Bui1 di ng Perni t: l, applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Evergreen Road fvr right-of-way priar to any use of the property. 2e Access permits for appr°oaehes to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 3. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Major Arterial standard for the improvement of 'Evergreen Road which is adjacent to the proposed deeelopment. Thi swi i 1 requi re the additi on ,of approxi mately 14 feet of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. Qa The County Engineer has designated Typicai Roadway Section Number One9 Major Arterial standard for the improvement of ~ Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed developmente Thi s wi i 1 requl r°e the addi ti on of si dewal6c al ong the f rontage of the devel opment. ' Sa Applicant shall s+abmit for approval by the Spokane County , Engineer roade drainage9 and access plans prior to the issuance of a bui1 ding permi t on 'the prvperty. 6. The alicant shall submit for a roval b the S okane Count PP Pp Y P Y Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal , plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the propertyo 4 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted _ and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location9 and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehiclese 8. Yhe word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successorse 9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 10. Al1 required improdements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormaiater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 11. Roadway standards9 typical roadway secttons and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposale 12, The applicant shall reserve a 40 foot wide strip of land along the rear property as depicted on the site plan. When the abandoned Chicagoa Milwaukee and St. Paul right of way is dedeloped as a transportation corridor, this setback will facilitate right of way acquisition for the corridor and construction within it. 13. That in the future it may be necessary to upgrade the intersection of Evergreen and Sprague because of traffic generated by this dedelopment. The applicant will be required to share in the cost of those improdements. Participation will be determined by the percentage of overall volume of traffic generated by the development. c) UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County9 as amended. 2. This project is a part of the Sprague Avenue ULID now under construction. Building sewer plans and sewer connection permit is required. ~ I • , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 d} CaUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of _ Utilities, Spokane County. 2. A public sewer system wi11 be made available for the project. Use of individualon-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorizeda 3. Water service shall be coordinated through the Dlrectvr of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall de by an existing public water supply when approded by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 5. Use of priva te wells and water systems is prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The si te i s l ocated i n Fi re Di stri ct # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existi,ng buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shal i contrast with thei r backgraund. 3. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or uroderneath windows or nonprotected eaveso 4. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be , installed prior to any construc tiono These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest out,let of the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per ~ minute for each f i re hydrant ) and meeting the requi rements i n Chapter 6 of Ti t1 e 3 of the Spokane County Code i s requ,ired prior to construction of the water serviceo Ail required fire protection facil'ties shall be installed and made serviceable prior to, and during the time of, construction. f ) WaTER PURYEY4R 1, Water Purdeyor is Yera Irrigation District #15, and they atill supply the site with adequate water for domestTC, fire and irrigation uses9 although satisfactory arrangements have not been made. 6 . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 g} COUNTY AIR POLLUTIDN CONTROL AUTHORITY All air pollution regulations must be meto This includes but is not Limited to the follvwing: le A1r pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather condTtlons. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of vearthen matertal must be control]ed as well as emissions fran all other constructivn related activitieso 2. Measures must be taken to avoid the depositlon of dlrt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaceso If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken irmnediately to clean these surfacese 3e All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress4 parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept cleane 4. Sorne abjectionable odors will likely result during the construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using the site following completion of the project and frvm occupants of the proposed project. E. ORDER The Zoning Hearing Examzner Cammittee, pursuant to the aforementioned, ftnds that the ap'piication vf Zaremba Midwest, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVEO to the REGIUNAL BUSINESS (B-3) ZONEe ' Motion by: Anderberg Secvnded by: Odell Vote: Anderberg - Aye Odell - Aye Harris - Aye Unanimous to APPROVE to the Regional Business (B-3) Zone ~3'0~ I 7 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 E. ORDER (continued) HEARIN6 EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND OTE G / a irrnan ~ ~ ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBdARD Planning Director db~~~~-J $y STEVE HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator Date: ~ ~ 8 MEETING RECt]RD Date: eG Use to document a1i meetings with externa.L parties deali.ng with County File No.: position on prflposals. Meeti ngs wi r h: cRT n~' ~ 'lr.7-6 6z Yy' 4 Represented By: County At tendees s r'~ e~' r►•~ ~3 ea ~Q E 'V' F I'~►1 ~ Specific TQpic(s) ~s PR ACtUE ~h1 ~J V ~A CT~Q Praposal.s Fresented : { 1's/ V E A/ E 0. ~Y /rT L V ~ Y 6 ~H-JC: l.c ~ I~', +I~ . C ~ r~ 1 /~,1 q J'~ . ~1•~r''fi~ 6(-)f /q D J;A C F^,r'7- 7-V /S -T f4 F- RF- ~ P, U Po h~ p- -r .S t~ La tl L- D 1 N C L Q 0,E ) H E ' ~ C vU &trt`'~S A1L~~ Ca un t y Pa s i t i o n S t a ted : 14 A! E co ci /1' -ry C-r (z) 1Af /-r v V4; L L- C-~l A.~ M . ' A7 6a/ 4 ,A t I llistribuGion: 1) ProJect File 2) D3.vision Head ~ 3} Co. Engineer ~ 1 4) Attendees ~ Use back or additional sheets For detail af ineeting if necessary, sa9r6 _ _J ~f ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ UT.► 0 \ e a ~ W try. > < ►'q'~ Q~ ~ ~ . • B A Y ~ ►w °D A V E 1 ~ ~ 14 O t ~ v T ~ ~Il[I • - Z 2 ~ < ~ 9 I ~ VlaL LEYW~ ~ Q VA LL.Er WAY L. 46 M 1--, t > : S r N J oc ~ R < W E Z: v = J Z _ a.V c SP A W-E + , . . . . . i N° 2 12 f • i j _ .►rrw► L = = 4 - ' ~ ` ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - J 1 st M r if Paroefii ~ rn ~ Sc1+o~~ ~ 47H AVE. CloIY/t ~ t r J. , W ~ ourt 0 7 . Z ZEm 15 m 8 6 ~ ~ . 7TMAVE 1 7TH A fA~AM HO 8 TH AvE I u 22 . . . _ . ~ . . _ , 3~ I C S N• t r~ j~ _ --r . 10 T►• r _ O . cr' p cr , . ~ J . E ~2 T ~AVE 12 TH T . ~ . . . . . . . . 1:1000 13 TN I►N E ni T H I ~ T 13TH Z t TE ~c ~ 1 ~ • ~ ~ ILT►1 Av L ~ EYt`'GREENI . . ~ ~ . . . . \ > ~ 1Fi N1C,H ~ ~ L.. 1~ • I ~ I , I SPRAC3UE AVEIVUE sf..,.* cu.. to CUR. TTP! 111 1AM0SCA►IMO I S!! TMIIOYON SY1/!11 ►:,.oo• ~ ~J . I ' I I I I(~ II II I I I'' I ! I I I o - IAMpSCA/IMG 0N '206' A/ n[OYIRlS 0 - ~ L D O .T~ , . ~0008 _ ~ - - • • , _I ~ . ~ ' - ~ i ~ ~ « 9 ~wT1 4---- ~ 1+11 • 0~! I . ` ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ - T R@T~IL ~ oa s~' Ri1STl /OY1/L91 ~ - • - ~ - ~ ' • ~1~ ~ ♦ ~ lAM0SCA11M0 00 i W. 128.00, _ : . - . ~As RiouieE. - ~ -.lAM0~4A~1110 :~~.i•`~1~~' .,u uowOio rn u~ _ ~ I ~ I ti~..~►~~.I~ • f W~ ~ . ~ . k. > o • _ W ~ ~ . rr►i w - i lAMOGCAPIMG - ' t•' qtTAIL BUILDBFI'93 BOUARE 466 TNIIOYGN BYI/RE w0,000 •R i ' • ~i~ }~'FrF'y~ r !'+l~ . M - QAl1090 IPEMTlN - ~ ~ - 4.000 sp I ( I ~ I I I I I ' I , r r LAMOSCAPIMO 00 '209' A• RlOY11! / - ~O~~O~ &'-0" TrP! 111 IANDGCAPIMO TNIIOYON /Y/flll ~ I39.00' f B-TDITM . . ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILGING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET i • Q. - FHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE NASHINGTON 99260 5?OKANE COUnTv :~-,,at ~Cu5£ P L A N N I N G REPORT Date: AUGUST 7, 1986 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: Spokane County Planning Department ~ SUBJECT: Rezone #ZE-15-86; Agricultural and Commercial to Regional Business (B-3) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant/Owner: ZAREMBA MIDWEST Agent: Glen A. Cloninger Pro osal: request to rezone an approximate 11.0 acre site from Agricultural and Comnercial to Regional Business (B-3) for the purpose of developing a Commercial Center, Location: fFe site is generally located south of Sprague Avenue and east of Evergreen Road in Section 23-25-44. II. SITE ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan: iMA30R COM14E~R IAL Category , - Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary - Inside Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary - Inside Urban Impact Area (UTA) Boundary The project i s consi stent wi th the Major Commerci al category of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. /J~ r ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) Zoning: Existing on SITE: . Commercial (established 1977) and Agricultural (established 1942) and within Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone To the NORTH: Residential Office (established 1977) Comerci al ( establ i shed 1983) Agricultural Suburban (established 1958) Commercial (established 1980) To the SOUTH: Commercial (established 1982) Agricultural (established 1942) To the EAST: Commercial (established 1983) Agricultural (established 1942) To the WEST: Cormnercial (established 1977) Agricultural (established 1942) Local Business (established 1958) Commercial (established 1983) The zone change request is consistent with the zoning trend along Sprague Avenue. . Land Use: Existing on SITE: Single Family, Storage Sheds, and Yacant To the NORTH: Office, Vacant, Single Family and Retail To the SOUTH: Retail and Single Family To the EAST: Re tail To the WEST: Retail and Vacant Building Land uses in area changing from older single family to retail uses. Site Characteri sti cs: Site Size: Approximately 11 Ac res Existing Buildings: 3 Topography: Gentle Slopes Vegetation: Natural Grass Agricultural Summary: Major Comnercial category not intended to preserve or protect agricultural land. Adj oi ni ng Streets: Sprague Avenue to the nortti of the si te i s a 110-foot County rignt of way improved with 5 lanes, paved sidewalks and curbs. Evergreen Road to the west of the site has portions at 50 and 60-foot County right of way improved with 2 lanes paved, curbs, and no sidewalks. County Engineer is requesting 15-feet of dedication along Evergreen (this requires approximately 14-feet of additional asphalt, curbs and sidewalks) and a 40-foot wide strip of land along the south property line for a future transportation corrido r, Also, they have informed the applicant tnat it may be necessary to upgrade the intersection at Sprague and Evergreen in the future. \ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) Pro osed Site Plan: se: Commercial Center Proposed Buildings: 3 Building(s) Footprint Area: 143,000 Square Feet Site Coverage: *29 % Structure Height: 35 Feet PROPOSED REQUIRED ~ Parking: 612 Spaces 715 Spaces Proposed Buffering Techniques: Five feet Ty pe III landscaping is provided along Sprague, Evergreen and the south property line. Tne site plan shows additional grassy swales for '208' along all property lines. Landscaping is indicated within parking areas and adjacent to buildings. Other Site Plan Considerations: An 89000 square foot Garden Center is shown at the southeast corner of site; if this is to be used on a regular basis, then parking spaces are required for customers. note: - rFe site plan submitted for review by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to determine compliance witn all Ordinance regulations and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage. III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Design: Site plan shows 23,000 square feet as storage areas, witn no speci7ic detail on locations within buildings. The Zoning Code requires one parking space per 2,000 square feet. The storage should be in areas greater than 1,000 square feet, Landscaping: Compliance with B-3 standards. Signage: Compliance with B-3 standards. Circulation/Access: Four accesses to Sprague; two onto Evergreen, Stormwater Drainaqe: Compliance with'208' standards, Sewage Disposal: Connection to the Valley sewer system is required. Water Supply: Vera Irrigation District # 15. Fire Protection: Fire District # l. Critical Materials/Use Activity: Compliance with ASA standards for aqulrer proteczion. /10 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 IV. SEPA ENYIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Zoning Administrator has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Non-Significance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to eight other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comnnent. The "DNS" comment period ends August 6, 1986, and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to ad,jacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner Corrmittee may consider additional environmental related testimony and the "DNS" at the public hearing. V. PLANNING SUMMARY The proposed zone change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and past approvals in the area. The site plan appears to be in compliance with B-3 Zone standards and includes landscaping along all property lines, within the parking areas and adjacent to the buildings. The Planning Department recommends approval of this application. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Al1 Conditions irnposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full cvnsideration to adjacent properties). 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall 'oe submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 17 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within tne concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Yariations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. Al1 variations must conform to regulations set forth in the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. All current standards of the B-3 Zone, as arnended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 5. That the present proposal is not detailed enough to determine whether ornot the use of or materials stored on the site are in compliance with Section 7,06 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of the ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY. Accordingly, as a condition of approval, the sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public" which shall provide in material as follows: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY SECTION 7.06 (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE). TNE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:....". 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 7. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordi nances pri or to i ssuance of bui 1 di ng Pe r-li ts. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF A~TiON pursuant. to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the projec± applicant within thirty (30) day s of final disposition of tnis application, and prior to any on-site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82-0458 dated May 4, 1982. /Y ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Pri or To The I ssuance Of A Bui 1 di ng Permi t: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Evergreen Road for - right-of-way prior to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 3. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Major Arterial standard for the improvement of Evergreen Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 14 feet of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the f rontage of the development. 4. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Major Arterial standard for the improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to tne proposed development. This will require the addition of sidewalk along the frontage of the development. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include tne owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 10. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 0 . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 11, Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Comnissioners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal, 12. The applicant shall reserve a 40 foot wide strip of land along the rear property as depicted on the site plan. When the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul right of way is developed as a transportation corridor, this setback will facilitate right of way acquisition for the corridor and construction within it. 13. That in the future it may be necessary to upgrade the intersection of Evergreen and Sprague because of traffic generated by this development. The applicant will be required to share in the cost of those improvements. Participation will be determined by the percentage of overall volume of traffic generated by the development. c) UTILITIES DEPARTMENT l, Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. ~ 2. This project is a part of the Sprague Avenue ULID now under ~ construction, Building sewer plans and sewer connection permit is required. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. A public sewer system wi11 De iiiade avai 1able for LF,e ~ro,j~ct. Use of i ndi vi dual on-si te sewage di sposal sys±emis sii:3l1-»t ne authorized. 3. Water service snall be coordinat°d thrOllgf1 tne Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply whezi approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department o` Social and Health Services. 5. Use of private wells and water pr, -D i t e ~d . y ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-15-86 e) CaUNTY BUILpING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site i slacated i n Fi re Di stri ct # 1, 2, Approved numbers vr addresses shall be plaeed on a11 new and existing bui 1di ngs i n such a posi ti an as ta ve pl ai nly vi si bl e and legible from the street or rvad frvnting the praperty. Said numbers shaN contrast with their backgraund. 3. Trash enclvsures sha11 not be located adjacent to combustible canstruction vr underneath windaws or nonprotected eaves. 4. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be installed priar to any canstruction. These hydrants shall be placed sv that nv portion of the building exterior is mare than 175 feet from the hydrant. The bvttom of the 1 owest outlet of the hydrant shali ae na less than 18 inches above grade. A water p]an shvwing each firQ hydrant (specifying the gallons per mi nute for each fire hydrant ) and meeti ng the requi rements in Chapter 6 of T'itl e 3 of the Spokane CQUnty Cade i s requi red prior to construction of the water servi ce. Al l requi red f i re protection facilities shail be installed and made serviceable prx vr tv, and duri ng the time af, canstructivn. f } WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor i s Yera Irri gatian Di strict #15, and they wi l l supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigatian uses, althaugh satisfaetvey arrangements have not been made. g) COUNTY AIR PQLLllTION CUNTR(}L AUTHORI7Y A11 air pvllutian regulatians must be met. This includes but is nvt limi ted tv the fol l owi ng: 1. Air pol l uti vn regul ati ons require that dust emi ssi vns duri ng demalitivn, excavation and construetion projects be controlled. Thi s rnay require use of water sprays, tarps, spri nklers, or suspensi on of acti vi ty duri ng certai n weather condi tions. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen materi al must ae control 1 ed as wel l as emi ssi ans f roi-n al 1 other constructi an related acti vi ti es, 2. Measures must be taken to avvid the deposition of dirt and mud fram unpaved surfaces vnto paved surfaces. If tracking ar spills occur vn paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. . ZONE P,E,L.ASSIF"ICATiO`J ~10. ZE-15-85 N.~i; I ~'CLLJ-~IO~°~ ~G~i~~;Z~L ,~J-~l-I0;Zi1'( (i:u~i il'- i rI uc:1' ; 3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using the site following completion of the project and from occupants of the proposed project. ~~r~crr1 ~ o U~ 0 4 u. GU-t o-~ -tdw N ctW40~> eAJ), ~ Wn eawdL ua 4'1-in ae.0 ,rn -"4 . ` d u.~~Q~(L WI ~o S t-t~ ~~^'L l,~ U e CPS S ae.~ . / o..e. e11 ULGI • ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY ~ NORTH 811 JEFFERSON ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 (509) 456-3675 I certify that I have examineci this perrnit and state that the mformation contained in il and submitted by me or my agent to compile said permit is true and carect ~ i:ddiflon, I have read and understand tfx3 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS/NOTICE provlsions included herein and agree to comply with same. All provisions of laws a-i ordmances govi;rnmrj this type of work will be complied with whether specihed herein or not. I uncierstand that the issuance of this permit and arry subsequent inspecti approvals or Certiticales of OCCUpancy shalt riot be conslrued to give authority to vwlate or cancel the provisions of any state or local law reyulating construction, or as warranty of conlorm;,nce with the provisions ot any state or local laws regula6ng constructbn. SIGNATURE OF APPLICATION OWNER OR AGENT DATE C... . , . . , , . . , . ~ , , : . , , IT. . . . . ~ . . . , , . . . . f~i 1'~ f~~ +..r f... L..'!!"" .ti r.> .a3 . , 91D9l.! \ 1 f I ~ i % ~ _ - - . . . , . : I ~ . . - ~'5V /O"C'o Ta ~Lt?L~ ~..~C S ~,Ic~ y0 , . _ . . . ~ ~ . ! ,i ' - . • . . ~ . ~ i... I'.r'.~ .'.:i ~t... ~ . 7 . 1. ~ ti.. t. ~ L~ I S~... ~ j_-' l.f i.: ~'H. ~ . „ ~ r i-•r w. • ( ••~i v. r...~~,.: 2~ i 4 f~,i'-} ~ r~,- '~j . 1~'{:. _:I.ii. YS..J ~~5r1 r~ 1.:~[° I.ll.~ ~ 1~~~:.. 1^} ~~Z...~~~ 1 r~' 1'..1. h"~ C.J-r t: . , • : ~ . .'r!. T', J ~ . ! ~ ~ • ( i ' l.' 1.:. 1... J. I • ~.7 . - - ~ . ~ i ~ , i r.. , ,y , . , ; . . ~ ~ ~ i . ~ ~ ~ ~ E . ~ t. ~ ~ , ~ ! i ~I , ~ _ . f . t.. . 5 l.:. . . t., . . i ~ i:. . `i ~ . . R':. l:r i'. r~i S..• ! _ ,;,i.. I~'~ 4'~ ~'r.~ lSl r-, i., ..~'a..l (~if... ! i•~s~~~'`~t::.... _li(`.'i. f. . . , ~ , ; , . . r . ~ . . . . I . . ~ .i i ~ . . i , ! . . I ~ 1.~~ ~I~ r. f.. .3. ^ r: .I. a~• .l. !x i- ~ ~I~ f::. . . r:; ~ i::.. . .I. . ~i • . , ~ , , , : ~ ; - ' ~ . i. ~ - .,i ? . ,i :i u rl . Nr 1~• i7 7+. •N: •~!t ~b: ~t ~i ~A: . . , • - . ~ 1::. i 4 i ~ . . : . , . : , , , , . , _ . • , _ , . I il ~ il I .~j 11. ~ . ' :I ~i: • I~ .i :t ';1. ' •i ii ~ ~ ~ .1 . ii . ' ~ ~ I . ~ ~ It '1 !11)' ;f, :1. ~l~. ~[j li. i} '.I '.1 :I li' . I' . . ' I II . . . . . , ' . . I . ' I ' ~ . ~ : ~ . i . . . . i,. ' . ~ . . ~.A 1, ~ I . . ' , . . . . . 1.. . . . . . . .!~...~...L. I ~..!~..~~.:~..I~~~ L !.i:.. . . _ ~ . . . ` f ~ ' ~ 1} Js ~~_I i~. ~ 1 .i.} ::Y I.,f I 1 , . . i. l l 1. t•'~ L~: i. • , u i i(.. f' ! . ~'J f ).i ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ . r~~ f•~i ;r .i . ~ . _ ;i• Y ~r~ ~F• ;i, ,i j~. ; _~i j~ d it 'v. '•i: ;r :i• n 'i( . . _ ' I ; 1-..f i , li ~i. ji: i ii. .~i ~ii• l~~ ~u,• li• V. :i~ ,-t- ir 'tf V. .!t tf• .ti• I. ~tr. 41 •r'• y3• }i• i~~ ~t A• .11• OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date__ T . 1 S. _ ) 9 Inter oihce Communicatic,n To_ 'L ra f f ic bec t ion Land Developmeiit Section Public Hearing Date: k4u-ci 7-~jl From- - - - - - - - 'The below listed developnient project has been signed off by this section ai1d wi 11 soon be scheduled Eor publ ic iiearing befose the County Hearing Examineer Conuni ttee • P 1 ease provide any comment s tha t you migh t tiave concerning this project in the space provided. P ro j ec t Naine : P ro j ec t Number :.~c Deve loper : Land Development Comments : ='-t-~-"' ~ ~ Reviewed By Traffic 5ection Comments: I Reviewed Bv ,.i~., . . • .r OFFICE OF COl1NTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON In<or-Ot f i ce Communication Date Traf i ic Section F'RO1M: La[ld Uevelopment Sec[ion SUbJECT: Publ ic Hearin_Date : Ttie below listed developmen[ project has been signed off by this section and will soon bt sched«led for public hearing before the County Hearing Examiner Committee. Please provide any comments tha[ you might have concerning this project in the space provided. Yruject Numher: Name of Propusal: _ Location: S Applicant: ~ Type of Development: Land Development Comrnents: Iteviewed 1Sy - - - ~ - - - - TRAFFIC SECTION Tra t f ic Counts „c ~~o,oQ t,✓ , f o~_ Ac c i d e n t s -7 - An [ i c i pa ted A. W. V. T. E. f rom I. T. E. Manua 1 EXiscing R.O.W. 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Stceet 4. ' Existin~g Improvements 7. S t r e e t l. SF.:7>;-t~1 ~-,,L~, 2. St ree t 2. ► _ ~ r ~ 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. . Ri ht of Way Reqiii red ~t ree t 2. Street 2. J _ ?p tr= -P 3. S t r e e t 3. O~- 4. Street 4. lmprovemen[s Needed to Mitiga[e Traffic Impacts of this Development 1. S t r e e t 1. 2. S t r e et 2 . 3. Street 3. 4. St ree: t 4. - Are there any projNCts or studies (preliminary or advanced s[ages) currently underway, wttIch coul(i have ari impact uron [he roadways servinb Lhe proposal? Yes~ No C(, mmen t s : ~ Ia.iny clvvelopErc oc agent CctflCar[td you regarding tlie proposed pruject? Yes El No ,~~~-ral c;t~l~ltillnts.~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ;.-~i~ - - - - R(- viE-w~~d Wy - - - Ja te - - I ~ OFFICF. UF COUNTY F:N(:(hF:ER SPOKANF COUNTY, wASll i NG7'ON _,TkAk 14- T(~; Sfc)k:tne (i,(intv Planning fepar[mviif FKc►M: CA,iinty F:nghieer'S Oep:1rtmPnf `mCpGU~ SUf~.►H:t;'f: a)ndttionq of I1prroval-7.c►ne C1►ar~~t-.Ntimhwr - z~ Appl i c-.tti t' q N,trne Ser[ icin z3_TbwnshtP.~ ~_N• lZaiik,p~EWM Ilie fo1lnwlnR ..conditiuns of apprnval" for tlie .iN)ve-refervi,(-Vci 701le ch:iny,e -Iro stihmitte.d to 'hP Spokane Cnunty Heariny- Fxam{npr C)mmlttee for inc-liv;lon fll the ."t-iff •irtnlyslG and 'f IndinRs and order" of the Iienring ticheduled INLAOIAS 19 8(0. , pr ior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit 0 Appl ican[ shal i ciPdicatP feet on EJ r E+c o q.~ for right-vf-way prior [o any use of the prope ty . Applicant shall dPCIirate feet on for right-of-way and slop ments as necessary prior to any use of the property. 1. Appl icant shall deciicate a foot radius on and prior to any use of the pruperty. Applicant shall dedicate feet on and a foot raditis on a n d - - for r igli[-vf-way prior [o any usP of (he prvperty. . ACCess permits for arproaches to the Count PQ:~d S st } y y em s ia 1 1 he oht.i i ned from the Spokane County Engineer. AccQSS permits and imrrovements to must he approved by the Washington Department of Trarzsportation. - Accesg pPrmi t9 and improvements to must he approved by t he Ci ty o f s. (a) Arplicant shalt impcove in a macinec consistent wi[h ;;pokane County TYPtCAL roadway sec[ion I3o. minimtim paving wicith . (b) Applicant shall lmprove in A m,innPr conFistent vith Spokane County TYPICAL ruadway section No. minimum paving wid[h (c) Applican[ shall improve in a maiiner ccincis[en[ wi[h Spokane County TYPICAL coadway Rection No. minimiim paving width . (d) App]ican[ shall improve in a manner consistent wlth Spokane County TYPICAi. roadway Section No. minimiim paving wid[h . (e) Othec speci fic improvementv : Applicant Shall Rubmit for apPcoval by the Spnkane G)tirit Fn►ine~• access plans prior [o the issuance of a biii1(11nR pF~rrnit yci the pro~,~,~..ty: 'ir.~ir~apP, anci I ~ Tfie appl icAnt Fhal l gtihmi t for appcoval b tlit, Spokane Co~irity Health District a~ietailed cumhinzd on-sitesewage t~system~ilin r:iic1 ~ tr'f ; ~~~k,~~~~ dIgposal plan Eor thF enttre ro ect ~~e w~~t~r f~ ~ prior to thE• i-,suancP of .-iny hiii l{ilnv ;N,rmtt ~~n ihP property. ~ V E t- aF', E 2 A parkii~g plan an,) [raf f ft• circtiiat i~~~l plaii tiha l 1 be suhmi [t.e,i .in(1 :,1)1)rk)veci hy the 5i►okane County Endineer prluc to the tssuarice of a biiildinb pecmit uii the propecty. Tlir design, lncation, .nd acrangement of parkink stalls shall be in ar.rordanct► wi[h st.andard trafflc enl;ineering practices. Paviiig ur SurEacfng as approved by the Cuunty E:ngineer, vi 11 be required for any portion of the pruject which iti to be oCcilpied or travelled by vehtcles.. The v)rd "appllcant" shall inclucle [he c>wner or owners of the property, his heirs, aesigiis, and successurs. L 3. To cunstruct the road impruvemeii[s s[ated herein, [fie app1 icant mAyP wi[Ii the approvel of [he County Fngineer, join in ancf be a wi111nK participant in any peti[ioii or resolution which purpwse is the forma[iun of a Road Improvemznt 1)is[rict (RIU) for said improvement pursuant to KCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane Wunty will ~io[ partir.Ipate in the cost of these impruvements. 14. As an alternative mettxod of construc[iiiK tlie road improvemen[ statrd 1►erein, [he appli- cent may, wi[ti the approval of the Cc)unty Engineer, accomplisti [he road improvemerite stated herein by joining and participating in a Cnunty Rc)ad Projec[ (CRP) tu ttie extent of ttie required road improvement. Spok.3ne Coutity wi 11 not participate in the cost of these improvements. . l5 The cunstructlon of the ruad improvemen[s stated Ferein shall be .3ccumplished as ap- ptoved by [he Spwk.ene County Engineer. !b All required improvemeriCs shall conform [o the current S(ate OE Washingtun Standard Specifications for Ruad and Bri(Ige Construction, and other applicable cotuity standards and or adopted reaolutioris pertaininK to Rnacf Staridards and Stormwater A1anaKement in effect a[ ttie date of cuiistruction, unless ottierwise approved by ttle Cu«ricy Engineer. 11. Applicant shall file a peti[ion for the vacation of prior tu any use of the proper[y. 18. Applicant shall construc[ a paved arid del ineated access .I'ppcoach(s) to meet the existing pavement on . 19. Access to Roaci s1ia11 be Pruhibited until suclt time as speciEically authocized by [he Spokane Cuunty Engineer. 2O Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainago plan reyuirements are found in Spokane Board of Cc)unty Cumrnissionecs Resolutiun No. 80-1592 as ainended and are dpplicable to th is p roposa 1. 21. This pla[ or development prop)sal iq located wi[hin a clrainage bastn Wfiicn has bc.~en identiEied by the Spukane Courity Eiigitieer's uEfice as tiaving s[ormwater rtinoff problems. Since tltis p1A[ or developmen[ pruposal is affectecl by or is a coiitrihucor to stormwater flows, property owiiers shuuld participate in tlie planiiing and implementation oE a fu[ure basinwide etor-mwater manaqement system. The f„1lowinK "Wndition of Approval" shall be required: Ttiat the owner(s) or smccessor(s) in interest agree to join in any Q)un[y approvec! Stormwater h'.anagemen[ 1'roKram aiid to pay such ra[es anci r.harges as m:ty be Eixed through puhlie Iieariiigs fur service or heneEit obtairieci by the pli+nning, design, con- b[ructing, maintitinir,R, or upertition of stcirinwater cutitrol facilities. 911/4 02 t4~~ o.Qp\;c. An`t- st,, p.~` Re5 eri.v e ck.. IA o-~ 't wt de 5tr o-P of L-atnd aloA9 ~ e a►2. r o e.rT J '2 p , A s d~ t c.rt eJ o~ Tt+E s'rirE p►o,r~ . t,~ h e~+n Q o►b o.,h ~i o tN e.c~ ~ cN o, w r~ ~ 1~.e e Ah d St. Q~ u\ tz.~ Tet6Ack ~t o f w Ay i S c~evetioped as o. ANS~or"t'c~,r l oN coQQ1dor tC.~s c ~1~ 11 AC-1A ►'t a.te- 2t q\.t o~ wa p,c %Lx I St i-i e N ~orL TG,e Co2Ri dor and ~ 'tin est ~ v ~t,E ~t~~t~ ~r `MA a# Ev~~ ~~Q~ And b~ 4b ~ o~ssA~ i-o u.P9rqdE It~,e iUte ,rse~T-eno ~ ~Q~~E f firqffic. q"+_rATejQ bY 'fhi5 deueQaPmenr. tkE 401cA04T wl1k be re u1QEd to sh~ee iu - he ~o s t o PA0.t, c.~ ~~~oU wilt be d e~ terM~Ued b ri,,e ~+e O ~ S E r a v e m e~ s, o ~ '~r4~►c ew+xr~'.d~ ~ Q q ~ °~er q !l Vo/k ~i ~ ~ $01 VhG- de4~) eQa pm eiv T. Zaq,emb A N~0 W es! T'he County f:nf;ineer has destgnated Typical Roaclway Sectton Number pNl. , _standard Eor the iinprovement of C.uat?g._y~~W (Ruad, 'Strret; -Avt+rat) which is ad,jacent to [he prupused~devel- opmeiit. TI~is will re(juire tfie addition of approximately ft. of as- phalt, cur`) and sldewalk along the frontage of the development. The County ';m;ineer has desibnated Typical ttoadway Section Number _Or4-- ~ 'k n V.~O standard foc the improveroent of ~'j ~ (a , Avenue) which is adjacent to the proposed evel- opmcnt. 'C i i n w ill require the addi[ion of erpteufnratti f~-ef pha.l-t,.uuf sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The Coucity I.iigineer lias designated Typical Roadway 5ection Number ~ standard for the improvement of (Ituad, Street, Avenue) wtiich is ad,jacent to tlte proposed, devel- opment. T}iis wtll require the addition of approximately ft. of as- phalt, ctirb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. , OFFICE U F THE . ' t,.r • i'. i i t•.. '~}1 - ,~•~~=►~.r:,~.:,. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR~0''MEI`rTT ~~a . ~;.i.~.►~,~['k~.-' L ~ - Tv Bua ldi nq $ Safety, Engi neer's, Uti l iti es, Neal th Dist. j: :2~~~ ~ Frvm Patri cEc C. FrankOVi c, Assi stant Zoni ng Admi ni strata . , , , ' ' . 777 . . ! Sctbject August 7, 1986, Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Agenda. D=te July 1 ~ 1986 Our August 7, 1986, agenda is comprised of three (3) zone reclasslficatrton 1"L'gl!€StSr As we are able to submit this to you earlier than usual, I would appreciate ; yvur response wi th condi tivns by Manday, July 21 st. Hopefu] 1y this time frame wi ] 1 be sati sfactary ai 1 the way around what with summer SChedUle5, vacati ons , ete, Nave a HapPY 4th Holiday ! fihankS, FAT AttacFrment cmw -J 7 AGENDJ4, AUGUST 7, 1986 TELEPHONE Fdfl.: 456-2205 SPflKANE CaUNfiY ZUNING HEARING EXA,MINER COMMITTEE Place. Broadway Centre Bui7ding, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 ZUNING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FQLL4WFNG ORpER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER GQMMITTEE WILL RECESS FRDM 12:00 NOON TO 1:30 P.M. FaR LUNCN AT A ALACE , TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS NOT HEARa PRIOR TO THE 5.00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE GD'NTINUED TO 7HE NEXT AwAILABLE DATE AS ANNaUNCED 8Y THE CHAIRMMAN OF THE ZONING HEARTNG ExAMINER COMMMITTEE. THE Z[INING HEARING EXAMiNER GOMMITTEE WILL TOUR ALL SITES ADUERTISED FaR THIS HEARiIVG BY COUNTY cAR AND AcCnMPANiED BY A SR'OKANE COUNTY PLAWNER, ON OR ABOUT TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. FOR aETAILS, COtITACT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANlV I NG DEPARTMF NT . LEGAL QESCRIPTIONS AND PRO,]ECT DETAILS FOR THESE RROJECTS ARE ON FIE.E AND AYAIL- AB'LE IN THE P'LANNIHG DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE. 9:0a A.M. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIaNS 1. ZE-23-86 AGRICULTURAL AND AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL (UR-22) {Generally located at the southeast corner of Mission Avenue and McDonal d Road i n 5ecti an ] 5-25-44 Comprehensiue PZan: Urban Prvposed Use: Church, Offices, and Resi- dential (NO SITE PLAN) Site Size: Appraximately 29.75 Acres Applicant: SPOKANE VALLEY CHIJRCN aF THE t4RZAREIVE c/a C. J. Middletan East 10814 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 2. ZE-15-86 AGRTCULTURAL Ah1D COMMERCiAL TO REGIONAL BUSINESS (B-3) {Generally located south of'Sprague Avenue and east af Evergreen Raad in Sectian 23-25-44.} Comprehensive Plan: Majar Gonmercial Proposed Use: Commercial Center Site Size: Approximately 17 Aeres Applicant: ZAREMBA MIDWEST c/o Glen A. Claninger South Freya Street, Suite 103A Spokane, WA 99202 (cantinued) CS ~ - - ' SPUK A N E C OUHTY ENG LNE ER Number P R E LI H I N A R Y C Q N S U L T A T I Q N A. F r oject Na m e: '~-ta ~ r~ ~ c s~~ , PROPOSAL Number of Parceis; ~ Section 2 3 T. N., R. E.W.M.; Quar[er 1 2 3 4 DEVELl7►PER Name t 6 f e.,.. ~ j e h i rt ? le Y' o r A c 3 d r e s s: /0 1 S I~v~c~.,► 4 I r 92- o Z__ AGENT Phone: Btjs tness 5-- 3 G t 91 !lome Nam e : 15 c L.C. (2 co . OWNER Address: ' PhQne: Business l;ome , Name: ENGINEER Acidress: ' Phane: 8usiness }iume B. PRELIMTNARY CONSULTATiON: Date : BY : ~ 1~ ~ t &."5 P r e lim i n a r y a) Ri g}i t--o f-WaY 0- 147`%~ Et►oc~ fo~ c e n ? Cand i C ions b) Curb c) Sidewalk d) Fave ~ e } Approaches ~.r~,n s e •~f" f} Dralnage .~e 8 ~ g) StatejCity Review Yes ( ) IVo ~ Remarks: N(}TE: This psoposal must comply with Spokane County RegulaCions for Raads, Ap- proach and Drainage in New Cvnstruetion; 8oard af Coutity Corjicnf.ssfoners Resulution No. 80-1592 as amended. Condttions are preliminary and may change after fietd in- spectian and review of County records. C. INSPECTiflN Date: By: Remarks : D. SPECIFIC CaNDITIONS: Fee Paid: Yes ~ Na Amount C sh Check ~7f( Planr~ing APPiicaGion Signed. Date • ' ~Y • r E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Fee Faid: Date Amount Clieck Cash MattlematiCal & Surveying Checks: Na. 1 Da t e By Na. 2 Date Iiy No. 3 Date By Aaditional mathematical and Surveying Checks: No. 4 Date By Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. No. 5 Date By Fee Aint.&Dt.Yd. No. 6 Date By Fee Arnt.&Qt.Pd. No. 7 Date By Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. I/$1 - - - _ ~ z~- . , f 3q~ 7 . ~f FILE f: CONFERENCE DATE: ZONE CHANGE CONFERENCE CHECKLIST, (Return this Sheet with Application) APPL I CANT's NAME: jea dzD^4,d sECT. 0,23 TwP. Z5 asE.41~/ . ~ r49 .su1,, 1~ /03 ADORESS : /on 144S1 rAe~,~ CONTACT PERSON : r CIn; ZIP CODE: lp11p? PNONE: PROPERTY OWNER (NAME) : p/Ad~ INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ZONE SUBMITTAL: PLEASE REFER TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE4,C) SUBMITTaI REQUIREMENTS `10 17 yoi $ ~a 14, ~ (r 1Q~Z PARCEL 0: c7416 EXISTIN6 ZONE: ~ PROPOSED ZONE: 6,3 . LOCAT I ON : 4EA5 T s ~ve~~i!~~1• a-~o ~ ~ CONPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY: SITE SIZE; SITE PLAN: 7 a PROPOSED USES: e74r~ G ADJACENT ZON I NG : Ni~arr,n tj_S S4!Dhw I-/4.1 Eu~7~n, W~~ ADJACENT LatVD US E: N5J~56 V-4k5 E ' W OTNER LAND USE ACTIONS: ~DAjE , EASEMENTS: ? TOPOGRAPHY: /5,14 l~ AFFECTED BY: AQUIFER PSSA YE,-5 SHORELINES OVERLAY ZONE e4slq ENVIRONMENTAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCES . INFLUENCE AREAS UTILITIES: WATER POWER SEWAGE SCHOOL DIS7RICT FIRE DISTRICT aDDITIONAL COMMENTS: r ~ C1 ~r No .si ~Cpr eJILL ~m 4 ~ eAfe~ .v? . f as.c~ - D . ~ BY: ZONING SECTION PNONE: 509 / 456 - 2205 1 /4/83 ~~FtLI~~> I fUIJ 1 Ult LUlqt tltl,LA55lFIC;A ( IUN--continued-Z • ' This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with writteh verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identifled. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE o° r~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our • re~quirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. ~ (Sign~. ure) DVt-L- 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for Ubmittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. The designateq `w ter p rveyor for this site is r s~ ~ ~~s5~ ,.0~f S gnature,) (Date) P 3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) r a} The ProPosal {is} (is not) located within the boundary of our servlce area. r b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. -v ` o~c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. (Signature) (Date) 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. This proposal is located in Fire District # • ~ ' n (Dat S~►,' Pf5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ' ~0 A preli inary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The ~ appl'c / /')has been informed of our requirements and standards. ignature) (Date) CJ I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTNFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- LEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM TNE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO- POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIF{CATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREw1TN IS wRITTEN PERMISSIoN,,-FROM SAID OwNER AUTHORIZ{NG MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR NER BEliALF. ~ (Signed) .~L _ Date: ~ (Address) Phone: i Zip: NOTARY Date: I NOTARY Z-OIFAL: SIGNATURE OF APPl.1CANT OR AGENT Date: R ev . 2/3/81 . . , . . . ,7• • . , . : . . . ~ ~ . , , . . , . ~ ` . ~ ~ • Y .,..Zti~~ ~r'TS~'~~' -~"~F'PMr.:_~►" y j'•`t i.....~..~ 7 p`~-r~~'~'~e. ' ~ . . . 3 ~ ~ ,~a aS, _r ~ 1' fX ,~1 S~ . ~ ~M~' i`Y.1tJ~4 7'~~ j~t .a'!~9 ;'''~i` .ti t-r f ~,f .-r` ~ ~ ..~ti' v_ {C~~.'~f~'N.~~l'~,~:~~1'~"+L.' r.~.`7. .'f. . . .~j.K i,ls~ti~t_ , " _ " ' " . . . • ~ pa~~y~': r4♦ Y :ti~ . , .4 • , - _ . .2 ; ' ~ • i. , c.~}t%;+- .~v, . . "i'b' , . . - . . . . , ~ ~t . . . . ` . _ . ' . . . . . ~ : . ' . ` • _ _ ` . , ' - _ . ' . . . . • . . _ . . • . _ ~ . . ' . . . _ ~ t ' ~ • ~ ~ ` ' . . ~ 5 . . ~ E ' ~ . t . ~ . . . y> _ :f" ~ _f. ' . . . . ' ' '1 x r. . r .~.•'j-.•`,'~ ~ i• r~,L c . ~ . . . . , . ~ r . ...1~~, . j . e ` 'r jy.~r~y ~ ' -1 .'4: .7i ~ ~ t ' t , 1 _ . . ~ ~ ~ : . 1 ` r+.' S.,.y r? r~'>.nf i ~ ,~i- ~ y'~~ '-y.l; ♦ :f ' ' . ' ' ' ' . . ' ~ ~ i if~•r •+~.Y~~`~ ~ , • t . ' ' t . • . • .Y` t~~.. '.a.'~ t y.► •.r.it: i. .1c ikv~'.~i- C`''~ rc+r., ~ ,t~~~{. , .I, ~ • ' • . . :-1. .,.L'r•`~.t-.` : !~'ti~'!C:y.« ; t~~,~~• ~ '.\..~~~e:::70► ' ..atlt.a,~-~ '~'~:S'* ~ L~2."*'~~FY"~1y a'~, t.,;..~1:~~ t . ~T .i•~ ' ~ • ~ : S~ i~._f~a•i ~~.i • ' 7 1 ~ 1 +•r~ ~.i-a `«',~,~,~~~..'7" ~,.~~ri A M~ S i < ~e-!~ ':r~~~ ;M ~i ~ ♦j'~~ s:`'Y k'~? ~-+„~~i`"y.~.~l► • ~y ~ . b..r ~ !-N i•'.Ks~{`~~ - . , ' x ~ ~ .r~ . ,~•w~ -~s1L yL, ~~+s+vHN~.~i, iK ~4 r~. tY.:O. Z. My ~.t,4 . ~rFt.~( 'r`' ~YI+lrl~►~, Sy`W'•'1f~,'1lt11~r•Y~~.~L ~ .M\ _ . . •!."r.~.C•' j,.4 'y' ~~~9 ~r,~ i 4 C'P ,a .~T1'.,..~.~ ..,vr; ~~.r~ ..3! tf~,, lt-s-, .i+'~!_7 ty;y ; .r.,r.,.,,..~. .~•.t. : y ' {~~,F ~xyr~~".~~•~~,,,`'Sr~S"%:r;►:~t . t . • . ti~"!~ ~:.:~1 ' a~•r'~.f' ~i + . w":.~i. ~ ~.~-,•r...." ' f .~'r ,r 4J"~• k; ♦~~Z, CL'C'L•• •n . j . .v' , r~! r.' t r. .rb ai~~' s " `1 .t~~T`'~,`~ 4'',, t•.t y,.f,~ ~ii~y ~ V,,.W~~Def +t~• . f s. . ~ 'f'~: t~~ "4.'.~•tr s L,•+e 1 1~= :+`~~4 r _ t1 ~ . . - . - _ ~~•-T. . ,y* .`r•'\~r~o_JPls'` -4~i- _s~"~' . i.YR..~ .K.:~~' ~ •~.r , ; _ C . ' ~ • ~ r ' . , . ' ~ ~''~t. . . . - r'•_ . . . V . . ~ ~ . i• ~ ~ , ~ ~ 'Yi; . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . - " ' . ~ . . , ' • , , ' , . ' . ~ . . . ' • . . . - . ' . ' , ' . - ' . ~ • . . • . • • . . ' . ' .5.. , .1 • ' - . . . , : . . , . • • . • , , 731 4 R E C E ! P T Date~~ ~ T-19 Received From Address ' • ,._f t~'- ~ .~...~~tl-.P~ a Dollars $.7-0 d Fot . . ACCOUNT HtJW PAID • ' ~ . Mh?. Of . .t : . • • ACCQUNT ' j CASN ~ ~ ~~F`~/~ v :t SS: , y::-; + AMT. PA{D ~ CHECK BAV~NtE ` MONEY gY w~~i~{~"i'"l DUE ~ ORbER . ir,, ~ yr ~ Y ' ~ ,,,Q•.' ~ 8K808 f~ , h' ~ ' ~ :.~,~L. 1'~~ r,~~..~--~~ „r.~~,c~ "~f AQ~~i~'"'~'~'~fF+*- . ~ it.,~. .ec . h 1~• ' • 7• ~Y .1~..r~ri~ ~t ~?'VJ~,,~ w~ ,i S~ R.~^" • .y, ~ . ~ a'~S~ ~ %n. ~ - ,+~'L #L,. 1.~.~~ • ~Z~ :ar r !11 ~ ' ~"~p,, +,riM~ `1 'i~A' ~1~A+i.r~ , ' , ~ J . ~ r.. ry'.~ir . 1~ ~ yt~ ~ ~ r.f~~ ..~r:t~t+ fs": . ~ . .-t'~'S. ~.`~i •.'!"1 r ~ i y~ •-s',,_C.~' 1',~~A`~. ,r - '~i. --r . r, ~ ~ . . ' ~~iit~~~ ~ ~~'l:~ !~~~`':t 4Lr~. . > ~ ✓~yrS':.._ t.r~ ~~6:~.xr~ .,r:' . . ; t, r.~ T : - , _ ^ ~ ~,r~ + , ' . ~ . ' i +5 > ~ i116 r . .~r , i , ~ . ~ 'e y ~~'t' \ : . ~ . ~ .'1 , T~s y ~ t , rs. Y"`~• C'~+',: _ . . - , , . , . ~ • ~ 4" •i HM. T• ~ ~ • . , * • ~ . ~ , • _ . ~ . ' Y ~ ~ ' _ ~ . ~ • . i . . ' - . ~ . ~ ' !r. ~ ~ i 7 . • ~ ' ~ , . ~ { ' ~ ~ . ~ . . _ ' •;L . ~ ` - (M1 ~ . I`. . . . . ` , ~ . ~ ' • . J'~ ~ , . • • • . ~ ' . •t'~ .s . GLEN A. CLONINGER & ASSOCIATES 6711 AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCNIT[CTS 7AP10 OFFlCC CENTF.R SUITF. 143A SOUTH 104 FRkYA STREET 535-3619 April 14 19 $6 28-W1251 SPOKANE, W^SHINGTON 99202 Po~der ofe ***SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER' S OFFICE----------------- $***200. 0 ~ ( 1 . i 1'I:. t.~ ► ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ S~ •~1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v • f: r. ~1,.,.► . c ,Co.ma,n Rezonina Proiect, Job #420 ~f 1MashingtonTrust Bank YOUR EwDnRSEMENT ON TNIS GI ACKNQWIIOGfS PAYMENT ON THE AlUYE ACC( SPOKANE, WASi11N0TON 90210 ~ , II' D O 6? L L iI' a: L 2 5 L 0 0 0 8 9l: 4 6 9's' (~l► •e,,, r...r•... .e. c . ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ . . , . . . - ' ;-~t'"0•~!^.-~'7 -r~r.-: : ~ . _ - 1f~ H ~ ' ~ . ~ Y. ~ ~ , - as, .r, ~ r -C.l~Wi~r~►t:.:.i'. .ir+;':. 'i.. - ~1 , ~ . S . ~ . ' ' . . ~ • r ;~Lr:-: ~.L~ k'~' . . . • , . , F . . . _ _....st_~ ti~~ ~>._.tinti.,wY'%e"•,s....~k.YY•fr>>•~~ • ~ . . • . . , ~ . ;mo~+~~~~~ . . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT [f! ; BROADWAY CENTRE 9JILLING N 721 JcFFEP,SON STREET iL,n6S a55-2205 .i•~'~" '-~"~'~S.L~_J~.i SPOK;+rj;~ TOrv 99260 cai:«••n~ i_ ;ur i . _ r_ _ .,E T0: County Engineers Building and Safety Health District Utilities Department FROM:a~Steven P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator DATE : June 2, 1986 SUBJECT: Continuance of ZE 15-86 from the July Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Public Hearing to the August Public Hearing As you recall in the May 29,1986,meeting, the representatives from zone change file ZE 15-86 indicated the addition of property to the application. Because of the additional property being added to the proposal, revised applications and supplemental documentation is being provided for consideration. At the May 29 meeting it was agreed to by the applicant to postpone this action to the August agenda to allow adequate time for preparation of the revised application. The Planning Department will not be assessing new fees because processing of the application has not officially started. If you have any questions, please contact me. SPH:ks cc: Glen A. Cloninger, Architect 104 S. Freya, Suite 103A Spokane, WA 99202 RECEIV ED 31986 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ~w.Larv c: Q V , CJ►r/► ; W ~ ~n. > l W ~ r ~i F . ,,N g ~ AY m AVE ; 1{ - V ~ w - 46111 Z ~ 0 IWO w,L LEYw~` ~ vA I. L E Y w A Y m > o N N ~ l Z < „ Z ' O W ~ [ W M~~1+ ~ . ~ ~ ~ r v' IN O Ri 1 < , < _ E v ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ Z. v ~ J• < 5 A . ~ . . . . ~ • f.C~4.~. / I J 2 ~ • ~ ~ ,,y~ 4' • w. A 40 • : YN{{~y-,~~. i'~l 5~.,'^ X j.a . Y ~ ~ . . ~ . • . , . ~ _ - - ` __a~-_~ ~ f ~ ~ _ ~ - - ~ ~ r • ~ Pe rocrti • vJ-'~ 4TN AvE. ^ , ~ . • ' ' 4~""~ t'•- ' ~ T a' ~ t. . T ~ t►~ • ' 1 • ' r Eml 5=86 ' t; 7•M AV E ~ 7T« A f ~ ~Mr,• . I 8TN AvE . , 3 22 ; . E . ~ ~ ° . o. ~ ♦ . ~ . ~ p r.. ( a~ . E I T "AVE 12 TH ' T . ~ - . . ~ . . . _ . . . 1:1000 Irl v E Z ' ► : THI Y < ~ ~ aT:.i.~s t V ~ IJ T N T 15 IN Av > , E"'# HiGNNI . . ~ t_ _ 14 l GTL c- r4 T 1 v nl _ S.-~ 5~~~ ~AR p ~ Pt~ ~ lF,~a lw y~ ~ ~ 1 cc.. 5 ~ / Lr m . #4 ~ y/C I~tJT1~ s Lt t1 E a.. ~ _ 144T Co P, ?QNE .1 caR JC~-~ C O&C-44 /~i r r o G 4 ~ p E z~- , 7-A 4A ,qu ~ r R r f o~l LQO~I~ U ° tos !z- } SP/( m ' FO~ ~ CT ~ ~rt cL L b ft,Y . 3~ o l v/`/ I " l~ / ' ~~to ° l0 ~ ~,r,,l • `t ~ u ~ ss ~ ~AF~~ ~ ~ wa, ~ r C2-D)& zaremba `oe GV~tc.'~ 1 kXt_~I;IIVE. ~'i~F. t+3t) {'LARti0'`' `'it~E.FT ~l}_5 1'l.A1N~"~;. ll.l.l!~:lll`-' E,t1(5ln haN-lllxl ~ .i9 t ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIPlG DEPARTMENT APPLICATIOId FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO(d Date: June 6, 1986 Application No: _ ZE-15-86 . Plame of Applicant: ZAREMBA MIDWEST , Street Address of Applicant: 640 Pearson Street City: Des Plaines State• IL Zip Code: 60016 °rale. No. fVame of Property Oraner(s ZAREMBA MIDWEST Authoriaed Agent representing OHUner GLEN A. CLONINGER, Architect (if other than or►vner): Suite 103A, South 104 Frevat / Spokane, WtS_ 22202 a Existing Zoning Classification; Agriculture _ . , Oate Existing Zone Classification Established: 1942 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Land _ Proposed Zone Classification: B-3 Proposed Ust of Properiy: Commercial Legal Description ot Property: Paroel 23542-9A10. 23 25 44 E 45~ft,,,of W 864ft_ of NW114 of NW 1/4 N of CM STP&P RY R/CnT; Paroel 23542-9016, 23 25 44 N 351.2ft of W408 ft. EXC N321.2ft. of W153 ft, of NW1/4 of NW1/4 & EXC E248.65 ft. of W401.65. ft. of N275.5ft.; Paroel 23542-9017 23 25 44 PT of NW1/4 of NW1/4; Beg. 30ft.E & 351.2ft. S of NWC or TH E123ft. TH S to NL of CMST P&P C0 R/W TH W to PT. 30ft. E of WL TH N TO POB; Paroel 23542-9018 23 25 44 pt. of NWl/4 of NW1/4; Beg. 351.2ft. S& 153ft. E of NW Cor. of Sec. TH E255ft. TH S PAR 79WL TO NL of CNl STP&P RY R,/W TH W Alg. Sd FZ/W to Pt. 153 ft. E of WL TH N TO POB. . Section: 23 Township: 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE 23542-9010; 23542-9016; Assesgor's Parcel Fdo: (See tax statement) 23542-9017: 23542,-9p18 . 620 Feet on: Evergreen St. Property Size: ± 11 acres FronLage:835 FeeY on: _S1T .ague Avenue Total amount ot adjoining land controllec9 by this owner or sponsot°: A _ Street Address ot the Property• N/A If you do not hald tftle to the property affected by this appiicatlon, what i$ your interest in itl N/A Please list previous Planning Oepartment actions involving this property: N/A ALL OF TNE FOLLOWING QUESTlONS A+9UST BE ANSWERED: 1 lNhat are the changed conditions of the site area, which you teel make th1$ proposal warranted? upgradinc of existinq zonin~ of the surrounding property. _ 2. What effect will the proposed aone reclassificatlon have on the adjacent properties7 Compatibility and continuity. R ev . 2/3/81 1 . = 1 1 11 } dx ~ i, d ~PLAfVfVIfVG DEPARTNiEfVT ~ i ; j • BROADWAY CENTfiE BUtiLOiNG N 721 JEFFERSON STREET i I► + ' , PMONF 456 2205 w' ~p SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 SPOhAn[ COUhT♦ COUNT NOUSC T0: County Engineers Building and Safety Health District Utilities Department FROM:5fKSteven P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator DATE: June 2, 1986 SUBJECT: Continuance of ZE 15-86 from the July Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Public Hearing to the August Public Hearing As you recall in the May 29,1986,meeting, the representatives from zone change file ZE 15-86 indicated the addition of property to the application. Because of the addlttional property being added to the proposal, revised applications and supplemental documentation is being provided for consideration. At the May 29 meeting it was agreed to by the applicant to postpone this action to the August agenda to allow adequate time for preparation of the revised application. The Planning Department will not be assessing new fees because processing of the application has not officially started. If you have any questions, please contact me. SPH:ks cc: Glen A. Cloninger, Architect 104 S. Freya, Suite 103A Spo'Kane, WA 99202 E C E E JU N 3 1986 glen a. clontnger, a1. a. 8po6cane, washington ~ r + ► - • J ~ O a p 3 Qi rL i1nT J ~ "C p OFFICE OF '4 4 N .o • ~ oS ~I 8 ,.c '~OVNTY ENGINEER ~ C. 23 ~~e° 25 e o tio . o o n u e , ae, , y 2 Q " ~ . ~~c ~ ~ , Q t~~ SPOKA NE COUNT Y WASN ; i a 3, 9? ~.D 0. u+ ~1 A o Q ~ ~ a as ~ tU ~ei - p ~ ~ • h ~ t t o ~ y d a A~ el o d ~ , ~Si2 ~c , Q~ ~c.1 4 0( v N t za~ ~ . -r ;~r ~~i J~ NaTE , ~ • ' ~ W d r -a~ratdo U o e f R Q. i b w v ~ SD a f~ ~o ~v~a 4 ~ 4, C 0 n t ~ ~ 3 ' o Z a Am 04MF t r+rJ E' P Adb L- ovse Ys + -0 p[ l ~~o1th O " ( 4 . R Y ~ O Rkv Q R L Y L O C A T ~ b ,a 'a!' i S T & o N!7 M I i ~ ~at. o ~ 'r a ~ G~tl 4~`~O ~ 1 ~ ; ~ ` - RA , I c t ;t~p ~ S P C~ ~1 E. ~ , I _ 'Q 'a 8g $F - y A P.. P L r WAY 1- cl - 0 0 h A ~ F' ao _ + _ ( SH-~ ~ ~ n - SPpKANE + COUN TY 1 ~ Rq U z31 J ~ 1 9 y r ~ d I P i R ~ P1o 40 ~ I ` ~ ~ , I , Z 9 6~T g i ~1 ~ + ~ ~ ~ i h4 61 tn tl ti ; ~ t 0G + ~ z ~ ~ e ~7C~ ~ CST RiW 8✓ ~2?~ .Sjt + L ~ FiLE 129 ~ tot-~o ~~92 : f i 6 ~ 4 5 6 7$1 Z , I _,r 4N u:~.,~. . .r;. • ' In1 ~ _ _ ' AG~fl - F1fICJV'QUT~cE~~9T~AUi.E ~I ~ p . • - OE - - - rr - ~ - - - . rv ,~s 1 ~ r ' ~ ~ ~ ^ I 1 ~ ~1,'•'S 1~ , ! I 7'F: ~ r i I 5 ~ r,4 ! c .r ~ r. I 9 I 6 ~ z G~ ~ ~ i i 3 ~ . ~ Mt,d ~ a ~ e a a B ~ 1 D► 1. - ' 6 ~ Q ~ 1r 9 • I y f, r~! /r' ITM I RD •I o ~ a t.,l i . { , AV E / ~ - ..0 ~ rco ta i ~ t f" If1 ~ ~ B ~ a ~y~( !,d ~ • N ~ I ! . I ~I ( ~'l `'~'1 Q -5 I i' ~ 5r I~9 t I A~>~ c s s 1 ~ . ~ - ~ i ~ / I I - ~ I ~ . k ~ , ~ ; _ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ t i ~ ~ s ~ ~ Zasemba CQvvoRpjIQN - ~ a . , , r - ~f ~ , ~ •~r/' . . ~ . y y g_ ~ ;~.R I ~ - . „ . . f _ - ~ ~ ~ . , . , ~ - ::r,.. 1 r*~ ~ ' '$_-00 , ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - .t~i + ~ • r. ± , * a ~ . - ~ ' y;. r"~ ' •~~{~~~`_y ~ ~k ~ ~ ~'M Y > ~ _ • : . : ~ I~ ~ P~ • ~ ~ . S ~^lwr;~j - - - ~ } t.. ~ f ~ ~ • - pnti 'r ~ f ~ ~ INTRODUCTION Since 1920, when the name ~ "Zaremba" first appeared on a hvme rernodeling sign in a blue collar meigh- borhood of Cleveland, Ohia, the initiative and ingenuity of three generaticans have forged a dynamic, multi-faceted organizatian with experience and expertise ~in all aspects of real estate developmenf, investment and management. Today, the actirrities of Zareinba Corporation encompass a broad spe+ctrurn - from shoFpi.ng centers, affice buildings and industrial parks to apartment buildin,gs, condonl4l.ium cvmununities and single-fannily residential developmenfs. - - ~ T'he geographic scope of the vrganization"s actiivities has expanded as well, stretching fronn the Midwest anci the Great Lakes tQ th.e Eastern Seaboard, the i Southeas# and Florida. ~ 5i.nce the corparatian began its carefiaUy plannedexpansion Frogram in the _ late 1970s, Zaremba has either comple#ed or begun construc#ion an more than I $710 rriiilibn in new development. This ineludes 12 shoppin;g centers with mvre ~ than 2.5 million square feet of retai.l space; nine affice buildi.inngs totalling 1.25 miilion square Feet; a 97-acre high-tech industrial park; and mare than $200 millian in condommu.:nium construction. Within the next few years, planning currently underway is prc,jected to result in additional cammer+eial, industrial and rresidenfia1 development exceeding $500 million. In keeping wifih the philosvphy of this fam.ily-vwned campany, Zaremba P. retains an awnershi interest ancl management resPonsibil,i,ties for the income - properties it develops. The Zaremba equ~ity pnsitian, cc~upled with cc~ntinrung - u. M ~I diversification of interests and activities, provides the cvrporate strength anci K . v e ~ ~ ~ stability that have prod.uced steady growth and success for mvre than 65 years. Equally signi ficant have been Zaremba's successful assvciakions with finan- cial institutions, private investors and joint venture gartners in activities rangung #'rom the management of real estate investment pc~rtfc~lids to the developmenfi oF C7 C7 affice parks and luxury cerndominium communities. Zaremlaa intends to continue this pa~em of growth in atreaciy estabtisheci areas and to prud+ently pursue investment, service and development oppor- tvnities in oth.er strategically targeted markets. In all cases, the carporation vvarks diligently to establish a strong and ii positive commurtiilty presenee. This corporate commitment has earned the organxzation an enviable reputation arnong public officials and civic leaders in ~ eveFy new commuruty and market tha~ Zaremba enters. - ~ 2 GROWTH: RECOGNIZING OPPORTUfiJITIES ~ I;~ I I . _yuch of Zaremba Corporation`s success can be traeed to the arganization's eacperienee over the years in a va.riety = Qf buildin~, development ,and rnanagement activities. What began in 1920 as a mvdest horrte remodehng business soon expanded intn a resto:ration a€ his°toric Westem. Reserve farnnhouses and the consiructidn af eustom-built homes for discri.m.inatti..ng buyers who wanted quality and superior - i workmanship - traditional 2arretnba trademarks. During the post-World War II era, the mass migratian to the suburbs around Cleveland and the demand for new housing presented Zaremba with another I~ crpportunity fpTsubsfantial grawth. Suburban housing generated a need for suburban shapping facilities, and the Zaremba organization stepped in to satisfy that need. And, by acquiring aereage for future develaprra.ent, the cvrporation was Mso in a pasition to enter the fieid of apartment construction wl-ien rnarket ~ conditions pushed cansumer demands in that direction, ~ Because of its interest in building a broad-based equity portfalio of income properties whose vaIue wou1d appreciate over time, quality in design an.d constructian were the foremost considerations tor continueci profitability This philosophy also served as the basis for farrnanon of a rnanagement subsidiary ta _ operate, maintain and rnarket properties arrd to structure debt and equity financ.ing that wQUld enhance their success as investments. ,.y Following successfui diversificatian inta the condominium market in the 1970s, the company's performance afitraet+eci the attention of instittitional lenders with troubled loan portfalios. First in Ohio and later in Sauth Florida, Zaremba - ~ expertise in constructic7n, mana,gement, marketing and financial structuring was - tagFed to rescue distressed, foreclosed and som:etimes unfinished office, apart- ment and candominium developments. Zaremba's entry into the Florida market in 1977 led to expanded oppor hunities in that area, and subsequenfly to additional development opporfixrukies in other states. It now has operating companies engageci in a varietv af retait, office, industrial and residential activiries rn major cities and key growtl1 areas t hraug hout t he eastern h a l f of the United States, ' ~ i. I ~ I + r wy 3 TRADITION CONTINUES A IthaLzgh khe corporatic~n has ~;rown I anc~ di~aersified substantiatl~r over the ~rears, a strnng family trac~.itian cantii-rues to pr+~vic~e stabiPity ancl directxc~n through ex~utive curp~c~rate mana,gement. , l r r a ~ ~ 'f+''a te A. Za ernE~ , san crf t~e ur°~cler, is eha~nr►ar~ of the ~ ,varci and plays . ~ a si,gnificank advisory ro1e an corparate n-iatters. The presadent and chief executive officer af the corporatian is Walter Zaremba, son of the chairman and eldest meml'er af the third Zaremba il generation. Two otller sons also hold key positions: Nathan, whose respon- sihi.lities irrclude planning, land use and marketing, directs a11 residential developnlent in Florida; and ``in~uthy, whose expertise in the c:t~nst~~ction fielc~ w~,~~er A. z.~r~n,~~,, ; ciii►ir„1ait r ra compler~ner~ts I~is managen^~ent skills, is chi~ef executive o.~ the c~c~rparatian's property rmanagenient subsidiary. ` ~ , f i. ~ . L4altcr Larcnik+a i Pn^:irlrrtr ~ 'I ii i' ~ i I II ~ i I - I Natfian A. Laremkia Residenfr`nf T7revrlopprrrtil ~ ~s- . r _ Timofh4' LarrEizba ~ lVtattvgelltc'trt Services 4 ORGA1'V 1L.A1 ION Te diversifred activities of Zaremba ~ Carporation, incxuding its subsidiaries and affiliates, involve the talent and ~ tearnwork of mUre than 503 peoP1e. I ' ~ All of Zaremba's development and marketing activities are performed by autanomaus operating cnnnpanxes headquartered in sevQral different states_ This aliaws Zaremba to maintai-i-i a srriall but highiy professional headquarters staff, ~ - ; ~ includu-ig an in-l-iouse legal department ai-id an extensive Einancial departn-ient ! with analysts, underwriters, cuntrollers, auditoars and other fiscal expcrts. These professionals coneentrate «n strategic plznning, Cznd provide the - opEratirag companies and development affiliates with overall financial services, - ~ l'et4=r L. Rubin. [jrne°rnl C+,rrnseF i corporate suppart and directior►. 7hey also monitor arid evaluate construction activity, ieasing, sales and financial performance for all Zaremba eornpanies and pro}ects nationwide. The size of each Zarernba affiliate relates directly to the scope c►f project- ; related. activikies of that specffic company. As needed, development afftliates retain general contractors, architects, engineers and other specialists whase ~ talents and experience are best suitecl to specific projects. As a result, the ~ overhead of operating comparl.ies and affiliates graNvs only in response to ~ deve1o}~~nent-related demands, r~~~ Yar~4, P1! I7i'wPr~f'~~t ~ Ndarvin Droz, Asux'rezfe Cntrr:sel Fronz a tinat-ieial staildpuint, a11 uf the Zaremba curnpanies and affflaates aa-e Kevin t'vle. l'acc f'n~iclcrrl I. separafie and distinct, each having its uwn cuntroflier who reports to the corporate treasurer. Each company, affiliate and project must pass the tests of se1f-sufficiency ~ and protitabflity ~ " Tl-ie success af this decentralized operationa1 appr~ach is dependent on the quaiity of executive leadership witilin each Zaremba ecrmpany, The chief execu- t . tives of Zaremba aftiliates and subsidicu-ies a-re experienced Profcssionals whn not ~ . anly have exceptional credentials in their areas of responsibilitv but who alsa ~ possess the drive and entrepreneur€al spirit necessary to generate tY~e full , potential from aaxy developnzent. - These kop-caliber professionais are attracted tc3 the corporation because of the oppUrkut~ities v~►rhich its privately 1~e1d status affora~s them tc~ share in th,~ owth ~ciwar~i J. Kiss. J~.. ~rn~~~;,~~=T ~ Rick Swihart, Assisfrrrrf Corrtnafler aRd SLICCeSS Cl~ the cOITIIJaIIy"S bUSiIIE'SS. C. L)ouglas Mitchell I L Virc Pm4irierrt - CrTralmller Rot~ert Harkshorn, Prcassdcrrt ZarenrEin Ctirnrnu ri ities of Olrica, 1rrc. ~ Kenneth B. Green, Presideraf 7arenrbrt Htrrtsing Cu. 5 - ~ ~ ' ' - I;I . . _ ip I t; R' ! . i `a.. ~ ~ y ; •I . a ~ ~ kS S ~ u V a' ~ • ! , ~ i ` i ~ ~ i 9 - ~ . r, I1 ~C +i ~ } S ~ ~ • - - - -n . , - , , t , • _ e b . _ _ ~ . . ~r-~~ f=- ~ ; _ t ~ " - I - ~ OFFICE ANI] INDUSTRIAL n the early 1980s, Zaremba laid the NRPF" i gruuunLiwurk fur expanded activity iil t}le development o€ office buildings and industrial parks by establishing three affiliates ta direct planning and develop- ment fram their headquarters in Washington, D.C.; Fort Lauderdale, Fllorida and Greensboru, North Carolina. = L Activity throughout Flarida is under the direction of Zarernba Southeast ~ i]evelopnnent Company. TI-ie company's largest project is the Newport Center Buszness Parrk in Deerfield Beac,h, covering 119 acres with nearly 1.2 mufflion square ; feet for corporate headquarters and offices, office shawrooms, distribution facilities, and high-tech research and development firms. Another deveiopment, the 22-acre Cypress Park West office park, includes a 16-stary, 300-room Marriott HUtel. Located at the I-95 Cypress Creek interchange, the development is in the f y` ~ heart of Brotivard County's fastesk ~,Trowing office market. Among the company`s c3ther major developments are Corparate Park at Fashiun Square in C)rlando and ~-rp'F _ • tl-ie award-winning Atriuni ZQOQ office building in For# Lauderdale, which serves G~.t'~ as headquarters for Zaremba commercial and praperty management operations - in FIorida. i Zaremba Southeast will continue to expand its presence in South Florida by ty eiZtering into jaint ventures with lenderslowners, developing additional indus- rk ~ . ~ tria] tracts, and en1arging its role in the development of retail centers. Jan D. lleese andWarren Fink are tlZe development partners at Zaremba Southeast. Metropolitaiz I'arknership, Ltd., hased in Washingtan, D.C., concenfrates on tirban and suburban office develc?pments, primarily in the Baltimore- _ i Washington-I2iehmand market, Currently under development axe the kNvin tc►wers of Tysans International Plaza. A firs#rclass office complex consisting ot ` 400,000 square teet of affire space and 550,000 square feet of undergruund parking, the Plaza is located. in prestig-ious Tysons Corner, Vjxgiru.a. Qther i development projects inclucie a three-building corporate ~.~ark in NeNvingtcan, Virginia, and a low-rise execukive office park uz I-lerndon, VLCg1Illa, located a-*~' - ~ directly off of khe Dulles Airport Access Raad. . . _ President Cary M. Euwer, Jr. and Executive Viee-President Stephan A. Hayes, development partners, plan to conkinue the expansion of Metropolikan Partnership into an ever wider range of producf types, From pure industrial to _ suburban cnrporate headquarters. Zaremba North Carolina, Inc., headquartered in Greensbaro, specializes in -r , the development of office huildings, researeh facilities, industrial complexes, anti ~ retail centers in the suburban markets nf I\'rorth Carolina, especially in the high gI"OWti°1 aTec'3 bEtW@eIl Rc11Elgh arid C1°tc']1"ICItte. Pl"e51CieTlt c1Il,d deVf'lClj3IT12I1t pc`ii`tTlC'I' Zaremba Sciutheasi Iaevelcjpment Co. Ronald J. Robich7ud also heacis the firm's residential subsicliaru Zaremba rrefr rra r:ghr) Conlmunities of Nrn'tl'1 [,c1T'ollt`1a, I1'lC. Ian I)a►rid Reese, f'nsirtcrit Albext j. Gutkentag Vire Presirierrt - Ccro-arurtiorr Warren E. Fink, Executizv ilice Pne4r`rlrrrf/Clrief Upetrttrng t7f~'icer Ftonald Liftprl, Dinvnrof Mprketing 7 i ti r w . , ~k ~ ' - , . - , - _ ~I►~..~ ~ A~~ ~ - t t ~ ~ •i - ~ ' . ` ~ : ~ : F i _ ~ i~ I J ~ K t'r \ „dL ~ y ~ .1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ - • ~ C7 R,ETAIL 7 aremba Corpc~ratic~n first became A inwc~l~ued in shopping center devetc~pment in the 195Ds in the CIeveland area, and it still retains ownership of four of the first centers it ever built. Beginning in 19$1, the company irutiated a new thrust in retai-l develoPment, ` ~firrst in association with Fart Lauderdale-based HSW Investments, Inc., and later with khe expansican of Zaremba retail acfivihies in Chicago,lllinois; Atlanta, Georg,ia, and across North Carolina. In just a few years, Zaremba-HSV4' has initiated or completed development of eleven centers t+otalling more than 2.4 million square feet of space. Seven centers totalling more than 1.3 million square .feet axe complete and fully leased: Pembroke Pines near Hollywood; Pine Island Ridge and Ridge I'lazas in Davie; Coconut Creek Plaza in Cocanut Creek; South Dade Shopping Plaza in SUUth Miami; Jacaranda Square in Plantation; and T. J. Maxc Plaza in Kendall. 5ubsequent develcapment, - including Greenacres I'laza in Greenacres; Linton Square in Delray Beach; and , Royal Oaks Pla.za in North Miami has made Zaremba ane of the leading retail deWelopers in Florida. C7ne af the partnership's largest and best known retai.l devel- - opments is Kendail Town &+Country, a$1W millian multi-use project including a convenience center an d sgeci a lky m a l l with more than 6(}0,000 square feet of spaee. Zaremba Midw e s t. In c., headqu a r t e r e d i n C h i cago. i s r e spQ ns ib le far ~.p1c`iIlIl1I1g, development and construction of retail eenters tl-iroughout the Mid- west. During its first year it Iaunched $60 mullion in retail development, ranging ~ from the acquisitionr rehalailitation and doubling in size of an existing shoPPin g center in Tinley Paxk, Illinois to the construction of 250,000-400,000-syuare-faat centers in other arreas of Illinois, as well as 5k. Louis, Missouri; Minneapolis, IVlinnesota, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. With sites throughout metrapolitan i.hicago, tvtal cievelupment ackiviky exceeds one rniilli+an square feet of retail space in Illinois alone. By deweloping strong, successful relationslups with major retailers through these irutial projects, Zaremba Midwest has eskablished a firm fvundation far continued exp~i-ision. The develupment partners of Zaremba Midwest are Kurt Krall and Jaseph 'vupta. Retad developrnent in the SQUtheast and along the Atlantic SeaUoard is directed by Zaremba Centerpoint Company in Atlanta, Ge(7rgla, with Charles Ctiarles B. hliller, CFrrkf ~i-t0uF,merrt Miller as t F~iartucr 71trrir~fia C'c-►tfcr~arair~~t Ce~. l~e ~hief de~elapment partn+~r. The retail keam of Zaremba Centerpoirzt, Zaremba North +iCarolina, and Zaremba Southeast is involved u1 convenience centers and shopping malls tvtalling mnre than 1,5 nullion square feet of retail space, incluciing Qver 600,000 square feet in Delaware and Maryland alone. Tlze team is artiVe in markets fram Wih-nington, Delaware ta Durham, North Carvlina to soutlleast Florida. Zaremba's rnany years of experience in shopping center developnlenfi and in property management have had a continuing positive impact oiz the profitability of all «f its centers. TIzraugh a comprellensive process that begins with site selection and market analysis and confinues through physzcal xnaintenance and ongoing Z-ar€rrrba Mid;vesk, inc,: assessment of consumer denzanrls, the Zaremba approach has proven very success- K"rt Krall, pws"fiwt fuI in maxin-Lizing both the profitability and the lvng-term value uf these assets. Jaseph Gupta. Vice 1'rrsiderrf 9 ~ - - 9~ Y . ~ • ~ - , T, I~ ~ ' .4 4l 1 ,p ~.f'~i ~ S r , I ~ * . V:~ . _ ~ ' , ~ • i L-77 - - ~ - , i . 4Md - - v ~ -r.~~~ ..~1~• - . ~ ` _ . _ - - ae _ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ :I. . . I . . ~'I . I ~ I~~~I~ ~ r ~ J L} ~ a ari~~Y~+ a♦ - ti - ' - ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~F i ~ a ~ ~ ~ ' '4. ~ iF~~R! ~1 ^ S f d ~ ~1#1! / ♦4#~t1 t#r a~ ~ I., : . a, • 4 1 +1 4 4 ♦ 4 • 4 1^ +I ~ f t 4~ ~ 4 41 4, w~;~a ~ I ~ ' . I~ w. ♦.4 4 ♦ ♦ ~E 1 ~ } ~ ~ . ; 1 ♦ . 4 4.4 ♦#,A O O R M!. F i M t.,t f a ♦'Fli4 A~0 t0 6r i~i 'g~4 II~' ~ ~ . ~`a _ ~ 4 ~ +i t f # f ► r ► IY M f i., 1 . I + f~ ~ i~ f i i~t~~r 4ta`/ i. - ~ ~ , - t 1~~~ ~ , ~ f«'~~# ► k+~"~ i ~~"E _ ~ y p ~ ~ ~ JA r,~~#i~,~i ~ 0.~; ri.a~ ! ' ! . ~~w ♦~lFlr4 p * ~ s . .s t . ~ ♦ ~ y~I I { ~ i ~ . _ , - ~ ~~3 ..s~ '0~ = ~ : T ~ r~ i ~ . . •1 ~ T'^r `43 ~.r ~ ~'st,,P l,t`~ -`--r°~ ~i~~~~T ~ f _ '`r~.' " k*;~ . ~ ~ - ~ , ti* l~ - , i. . , A ~ . . , ~ I ~ , . . ~ ~...s . . . - ~ ~ , • ~ J' . , `4 ~ . . _ I ~ ~ _ _ r--.-- . 1Y e ~ { OV ~s,£. - ~ . 1 ~~k ; =~r ~T . , 1 . i ~ ~ : _--'t ~ ,T _ ~ _ ~ ~ - fi~~. ~ ~ . . _ p , - ~ - ' ' : ~ ~ t✓/mN . °q, , ~ . . - ' " ; ` ~ . •~~`e~ ~ ~ ~~i t" n ''j5, t •t . ~ a > ' e.'M~ _ ~ y ~ } . '.s ~^R 10 RESII?ENTIAL Residential develapments com- prise the foundation on which Zaremba Corporation was built, arid they eontinue ta constiirute an important portion of the company's business. In Northern Ohio, under the direction of the parent firm, Zaremba has built more than 3,000 singIe-family homes and been responsible for the development i` of several condaminium cammunikies that reflect a wide diversity in arrhiteeture, pricing and lifestyle. Two af its newest develoQments, the sophisticated WaQd- hawk Club and the countrified MacIntash Farms, both near Cleveland, represent Zaremba's cantinued growth and involvement in the Cleveland market, Since 2aremba entered the Florida market in 1977, its activities have grown rapidly and dramatically, In South F1orida, Zaremba has develnped and sold mure than 1,()UO condoniinium units worth rnore than $115 million, including the _ elegant Hampt~~n Beach Club in Pc~mpanc~ Beach an~i the luxurious c~cean,to-river _ P~ • Sandpebble Beach Club c►n Hutchtnson Island. T'he cflrporahon is also active in Lor the development and management of rental agartrnent communities in Browar+d anci Dade C'uunties. Farther north, develapments include the exclusiue Sea Oaks and Marsh Island cundorrunium communities near Uearo Beach. Combined, the two develop- ments total more than 800 units valued at more khan $170 nullion, ltesidential development throughaut Florida is direc:ted by Zaremba De- velopment Company, wit'h offices in Vero Beach and Fort Lauderdale. Frank C. Weed is president and develnpmerrt partner. The company also has two suhsidiaries, Zareniba Homes, Inc. and Zaremba IZealty. CJther residential actiWity is centered in North Carolina, where Zaremba Commurtities af North Carolina, Inc. is active in the Winston-Salem, Greens- boro, Raleigh and Charlotte markets. Zaren-iba Commuruties` emphasis is on smalier residential developments bui]t as individual neighborhoads, including _ the recently cumpleted and popular Wedgewood neighbonc~~od u1 Greensboro. 5orne of the developments, such as Wedgewood and Cotswold Village in Greensboro and Ambience in RaleighlCary, are comprised of single-family ~ detached homes. t7thers, such as Stonehaven in Winston-Salem and Chatham Pines u-i RaleighJGary, are a mix of attached townliauses and patio homes. Ronald J. Robichaud, who heads Zaremba's retail, office and industrial ~ Fraitk C. Weed (scatecl), d'rasrr.lr-irf development affiliate in Narth Caralina, is alsa the cluef executive of the ?armrrifxr Cr3arrmrrrttfies lleft? 13c-atlt residential operation. - - a= ' 4p., ~ h',onald J. Robichaud PseSieletrl, Zarrrvrfja Ccittrrrari►:ities cffcrrth CQmti►w, fric. ~ ~ ASSET MANAGEMEI'vT As a family owned business whose reputation and corporate strength depend on the quality and success of ~Z its developments, the campany emphasizes careful planning and effieient and prafessional managernent. Reflective of the campany's deeply roated corporate philosophy, Zaremba owns, ei t her w ho lly or in part, most o f t he income-producing properties it devela ps. Years a go, Zar e rn ba d e c i d e d t h a t t o p r ot e c t t h e se inves tmen ts an c i ta realize maximum long-term appr+eciation in equity and income, it would directly Managemetit Sen-i+:es - F[ur'sda; manage its properties. AletJ. aey; cc.L. Those management activities today are earried on by Zaremba 1Vlanagement F-mat[hw ljrcr I'rrN-ictcnd Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Zaremlaa Corporation, with nffices Tim ZarNmba r~~,,, ~,~~~Llx, h<~~~t~~drt~~r in Cleveland, Fort Lauderdale, and ChicagU. Since Zaremba first entered the management field in 1962, this arm of the ~ campany has grQwn substantially. It now has managerial responsibilities for rental apartments, and retail, office and industrial developments throughout the eastern half of the cauntry. .As a further reflection of the eampany`s broad scope and geagraghic diversity it operates another division, Condominium Gonsult- ants of America, to provide consulting and management services to condo- minium owners` associations. - C7riginally created to manage its own properties and developments, ,Zaremba ~ Management today offers a wide variety of managerial and consulting services to a braad range of outside clients, including financial institutiorts with real estate hoidings, investors and c~ther real estate de~relc~pers. c~ Additionally, Zaremba Management designs and executes a braad range tf of mark+et and demographic studies far developers, and for county and " state agencies. In all cases, the guiding philosophy is the same - asset performance and - -appreciatinn depend heavily on the skill and effectiveness of the management argaruzation. Physical maintenance, capital improvernents, competitive pricingr good tenant-landlord relations, careful morutoring and reporting of financial , 7 rr performance - these and other cpnsiderations explain Zaremba's demonstrared success in achieving income performance and returns on equity consistently ~ above indus`. standards. ~ ~ 12 Zaremba . e . . industry, , , -o , on fo , . .0 years. o, . , ~ . of family , , + , i , a ' . b. ` synonymous with q . 1 . o . ! Its a .y ~ • s i , 1 f • • e spirit f ~ • e it birth, i. drive / r , a d , o . d ° i p M M • • diversity • r ` • d' • i • d` • • ! petitive industry. • ~ i .%:.SM g.: p.~.y?; b:, ~.~"8 a~ Y.~~ ~%j ~ ~ A.d. X„: ; _ _ s` M.'. ,d',, _ _ • m•° i t ; _ y 1 ~ s } k t t + _ u } 3 F ~ j` ~ g ~ i ~ ~ w ~ 4~ P I ~ E j . w r. i i .M _ ~ . 1 h t r , } F f `.~t s j w . . r i i } ~ i „1 t m ~ m...m~ d I ~q _.e..,.<_....... w. V m § m.....w....~ 4.1 b 6 t. S _ i ~ ''a t 9