ZE-022-94 • h A
r
. ' • '
/
SPOKANE COUNTY REcEl!!ED
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER ~~~y 2~ 1994
Cacnty Ennin@eriny
INTRODUCTION
This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on June 23, 1994.
The members of the Comnlittee present are: Jan Reuter, Chair, Jane Myers and
Frank Yu se.
PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Gene Cohen requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-22-94,
from Regional Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial
(I-2) for food product manufacturing, retail sales and those uses allowed in the
proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2) zones.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The property is generally located north of Broadway Avenue, south of Interstate
90, approximately 2,000 feet east of Barker Road in Section 17, Township 25
North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
2. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record.
3. The exisring land uses in the area include industrial and commercial uses to the
north of the site with a mixture of vacant land, small to large lot residential uses and
small commercial uses along arterials.
4. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates tlus site as Urban. The Urban category provides
for development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses
including intensive residenrial development. The Urban category considers a variety of
land uses to be appropriate, however, major commercial and heavy industrial uses are considered as noncompatible uses in the Urban category. However, given previous
land use acrions, the location of the site adjacent to Interstate 90, and considering the
transition policy of the Comprehensive Plan, the zone reclassif'icadon is appropriate.
6. The proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan.
7. The Arterial Road Plan designates Broadway Avenue as a Local Access Street, with
a recommended right of way width of 60 feet.
8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Regional
Business (B-3) previously established as Freeway Commercial zoning in 1976 and
redesignated to Regional Business on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal does conform to the
requirements of the proposed zone.
• ~ .
. 1 r .
9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued. The
Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS.
10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled.
11. The owners of adjacent properties expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the
proposal.
12. The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the
original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is
justified. Specifically, changed conditions include the transitioning of the area
away from urban residential to commercial and light industrial.
13. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or
welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing
agencies.
14. Potential impacts to traffic from future unspecified uses allowed in the Regional
Business (B-3) zone may require off-site mitigating measures as deterniined by
traff'ic analysis.
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on
the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property,
heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest.
2. The following Conditions of Approval apply to the real property described below:
. The Regional Business (B-3) zone reclassification applies to the
following real property:
Lot 8, Block 3, "CORBIN ADDTTION to GREENACRES", as per plat thereof
recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, Page 30, Spokane County, Washington.
EXCEPT the east 180 feet thereof, AND EXCEPT Broadway Avenue
The Light Industrial (I-2) zone reclassification applies to the following
real property:
The east 180 feet of Lot 8, Block 3, "CORBIN ADDTI'ION to GREENACRES', as per
plat recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, page 30, Spokane County, Washington.
EXCEPT Broadway Avenue.
TOGETHER WITH that portion of 20 foot vacated strip lying easterly of said Lot 8 and
Northerly of Broadway Avenue.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 2
. , , .
•
, •
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, the Light Industrial
(I-2) zone, and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the
Planning Director/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not limited to building
locarion, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pennitted zone. All
variarions must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building pernuts.
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance
bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be
installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of
special cond.irions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title
Notice shall serve as public norice of the conditions of approval affecting the
property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and sha11 only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. The Planning Department shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the
same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including
lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the
property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the
provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is
more particularly described as follows: . . . "
8. Any subdivision of the subject property shall be consistent with state and county
subdivision regulations.
HEC Order for Z.E-22-94 Page 3
• , ,
Y
• SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to is5uance of a buildin~ermit or ~the reauest of the Co in En~ineer in coniunction
wi a Co n~ Road Froigpl/Road Improvement Disrrict. whichever action comes first:
1. Applicant shall dedicate 60 feet on Hodges Road for right-of-way, from Broadway
south to Sprague Avenue.
2. The applicant shall dedicate an applicable radius on Broadway Avenue and Hodges
Road.
Prior to ispance of 4 building-pernut or use of nropertV as nronosqA,
3. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer. ,
4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans.
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the
Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan
and surface water disposal plan for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the
development is to be phased.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
7. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any
petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement
District (RID) for said improvement, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended.
Spokane County will not parricipate in the cost of these improvements. Th1S IS
provision is applicable to that portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and
including Barker Road.
8. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road
improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project
(CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not
participate in the cost of these improvements. This is provision is applicable to that
portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and including Barker Road.
9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
10. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the improvement of Hodges Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 4
. •
, asphalt along the frontage of the development. 1'he construcrion of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the improvement of Broadway Avenue, which is adjacent to the
proposed developmenL This will require the addition of varying amounts of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
12. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construcrion and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
13. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal.
14. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer. All work
within the public road right-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by t11e
County Engineer.
15. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to
be completed prior to the release of a building permit, or a bond in an amount
estimated by the Counry Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
16. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisirion.
. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utiliries. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocarion costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
17. At the rime of printing of these conditions, Broadway Avenue is a state facility
under control of the State Department of Transportation. DOT, Spokane County
Engineering and various property owners have been working together to realign
Broadway Avenue, and in the process Broadway Avenue will be turned back to
Spokane County. Without the realignment of Broadway Avenue, potenrially only
right-in and right-out turning movements would be allowed from Barker Road.
18. Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 which
specif'ies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by
the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the
owner(s) properry, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the
formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW,
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 5
• , .
,
which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If an RID is formed by either the
petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s)
or successor(s) further agree:
(a) that the improvement or construcrion contemplated within the proposed RID is .
feasible;
(b) that the benefits to be derived from the formarion of the RID by the property
included therein, together with the amount of any County participation,
exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and
(c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed.
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a
result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID
by either petition or resolurion method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
This requirement applies to that portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and
including Barker Road.
19. Spokane County requires that a traffic analysis be done prior to any building
permits being issued on that portion of the proposed zone change that shows no
specific uses. This analysis shall be coordinated with the Washington State
Department of Transportation.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
2. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to
RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the formarion of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecring to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94.
3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit
is required.
4. Applicant is required to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 6
. . , ,
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Urilides, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project, and individual service
will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authorized."
5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requirements administeredlenforced as authorized by the
State Buildings Code Act. Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS;
BUILDING ACCESSIBII.ITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY
CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTTON; AND ENERGY
CODE REGULATIONS.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not limited to the
following:
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather condirions. Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construcbon-related activiries.
3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parlcing
areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions.
4. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of
dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If traclang or spills
occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these
surfaces.
5. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article, V requires that a Notice of Construction and
Application for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the
construction, installation or establishment of air pollution source. This includes
fue41 fired equipment (oil, natural gas, etc...) that has an input rating greater that
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 7
• .
400,000 BTLT/hour and many other industnal/commercial activities. Because the
Notice of Construction approval process can be lengthy, if any such equipment is
being installed, the applicant should file the Notice of Construction as early as
possible to avoid potential delays to the project.
6. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV requires registration 'with this agency.
7. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.).
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. Due to the undefined uses proposed in this Regional Business (B-3) rezone request and
the potential traff'ic impacts on the Barker Road/I-90 Interchange, WSDOT in
conjunction with Spokane County Engineers requires that development, beyond the
presently proposed nut factory and related maze, address traffic impacts once a
proposed use is defined. This would necessitate that the applicant prepare a traffic
analysis to document that adequate capacity is available at the interchange to
accommodate the proposed development. If after review of this analysis it is
deternzined that adequate capacity does exist WSDOT will certify this in writing to the
County. If adequate capacity does not exist it will be the responsibility of the applicant
to create the needed capacity before the proposed project moves forward. In either case
adequate capacity must be available before any building permits are issued for this
property (excluding the nut packing factory and the related maze).
2. T'hat the applicant enter into the proposed Road Improvement District (RID)/County
Road Project (CRP) which is being formed by Spokane County Engineers in
conjunction with WSDOT to provide for the improvement of Broadway Avenue and the
realignment of Broadway Avenue at Barker Road.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 8
. -
ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Gene Cohen for the Zone
Reclassification from Regional Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) and
Light Industrial (I-2) for food product manufacturing, retail sales and those uses
allowed in the proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2) zones
as described in the application ZE-22-94.
Motion by: Jane Myers Seconded by: Frank Yuse
Vote: (2-1) TO APPROVE TBE ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON
HEARING EXCAMINER CO
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, 4RDER VOTE
,
~
~ CHAIR
~
v ~
ATTEST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
eJOHN W. EDERSON
Senior Planner
04 73. /~~rI
DATE
Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this
written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10)
calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will
be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,
West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$210 processing fee payable to
the Spokane County Treasurer.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at (509) 456-2205.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 9
. ~ .
SPUKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER CUMMITTEF
FINDINGS OF FACT, CnNCLUSIONS ANI) ORDLR
IN'TRUDUCTIUN
This matter has cUnie; before t}ie Hearing Lxa111inc:r Lommittee on June 23,1994.
The members of the Committee present are: Jan Reuter, Chair, Jane Myers and
;
Frank Yuse. s - _
PROPOSAL ~ The sponsor, Gene Cohen requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-22-94,
from Regional Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial
(I-2) for food product manufacturing, retail sales and those uses allowed in the
proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light lndustrial (I-?) zones.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
,
1. The property is generally located north of Broadway Avenue, south of Interstate Y
90, approximately 2,0(}0 feet east of Barker Road in Section 17, Township 25
North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
2. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Reporc ~is Ii,irt o1 this rcrc>rd.
3. The existing land uses in the area include/are
4. The proposed use is is not compatible with existing uses in the area.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category provides
for development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses
including intensive residential development. The Urban category considers a variety af ~
land uses to be appropriate, however, major commercial and heavy industrial uses are
considered as noncompatible uses in the Urban category. However, given previous
land use actions, the locadon of the site adjacent to Interstate 90, and considering the
transition policy of the Comprehensive Plan, the zone reclassification is appropriate.
6. The proposed zoning dces does not implement and conform to the
Comprehensive Plan.
7. The Arterial Road Plan designates Broadway Avenue as a La;al Access Street, with
a recommended right of way width of 60 feet.
8. The exisring zoning of the properry described in the application is Regional
Business (B-3) previously established as Freeway Commercial zoning in 1976 and
redesignated to Regional Business on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal does does not
conform to the requirements of the pmposcci zone.
• • . ` ~ ~ 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Determinarion of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued. The
Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS.
10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulf'illed.
11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed approval disapproval nether both
approval and nor disapproval of the proposed use.
12. The applicant has has not demonstrated that conditions have substanrially
changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone
reclassification is is not justified. Specifically, changed conditions include the
tiansitioning of the area away from urban residential to commercial and light
industrial.
13. The proposed use will will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the
reviewing agencies.
14. The Committee additionally finds/concludes:
a.
b.
c.
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on
the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property,
heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest.
2. The following Cond.itions of Approval apply to the real property described below:
The east 180 feet of Lot 8, Block 3, "CORBIN ADDTTION to GREENACRES', as per
plat recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, page 30, Spokane County, Washington.
EXCEPT Broadway Avenue.
TOGETBER WTI'H that portion of 20 foot vacated strip lying easterly of said Lot 8 and
Northerly of Broadway Avenue.
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
1.
2.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 2
. a • .
.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, the Light Industrial
(I-2) zone, and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the
Planning Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building
locadon, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All
variarions must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits.
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Planning Director/designee sha11 be submitted with a performance
bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be
installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of
special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title
Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the
property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcei of property legally described as [ ] is the subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. [ j is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. The Planning Deparnnent shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the
same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposirion, including
lapsing of appeal period, a Title Norice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the
property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the
provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is
more particularly described as follows:
8. Any subdivision of the subject property shall be consistent with state and county
subdivision regulations.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 3
. , • .
. . •
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to issuance of a building-Wrnut or at the recW,est of the Coqny EnpLn er in conjunction
with a Co in Road Pro~fRoad Imnrovement DistricL whichever action cames first
1. A plicant shall dpdicate 60 feet on Hodges Road for right-of-way.k(~ ,1
~.R~u~2. • ~
applicant shall dedicate an applicable radius on Broadway Avenue and Hodges
2. The
Road.
Prior to iUuance of a building-permit or use of nronertv,LUroposed•
3. Access permits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans.
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the
Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan
and surface water disposal plan for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the
development is to be phased.
6. A parking plan and traffic circularion plan shall be submitted and approved by the
, Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
7. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any
petition or resolurion which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement
District (RID) for said improvement, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended.
Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This is
provision is applicable to that portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and
including Barker Road.
8. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the
applicant may, with the approval of the Counry Engineer, accomplish the road
improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project
(CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane Counry will not
participate in the cost of these improvements. This is provision is applicable to that
portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and including Barker Road.
9. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
10. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the improvement of Hodges Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 4
. .
• .
11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Local
Access standard for the irnprovement of Broadway Avenue, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of varying amounts of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and .
sidewalk is also required.
12. All required 'unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washington
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other apphcable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
13. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are
found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolurion No. 80-1592 as
amended and are applicable to this proposal.
14. No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer. All work
within the public road right-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer.
15. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to
be completed prior to the release of a building permit, or a bond in an amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
16. There may exist uriliries, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utiliries. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocarion costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
17. At the time of printing of these conditions, Broadway Avenue is a state facility
under control of the State Department of Transportation. DOT, Spokane County
Engineering and various property owners have been worlang together to realign
Broadway Avenue, and in the process Broadway Avenue will be turned back to
Spokane County. Without the realignment of Broadway Avenue, potentially only
right-in and right-out turning movements would be allowed from Barker Road.
18. Applicant sha11 sign and record Spokane County Norice to the Public No. 6 which
specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by
the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the
owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the
formation of a RID by the resolurion method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW,
which resolurion includes the owner(s) property. If an RID is formed by either the
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 5
• .
. • -
, -
petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s)
or successor(s) further agree:
(a) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is
. feasible;
(b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property
included therein, together with the amount of any County participation,
exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and
(c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiendy developed.
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as
authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a
result of the improvements called for in conjuncrion with the formation of the RID
by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
This requirement applies to that portion of Broadway Avenue to be realigned to and
including Barker Road.
19. Spokane County requires that a traffic analysis be done prior to any building
permits being issued on that portion of the proposed zone change that shows no
specific uses. This analysis shall be coordinated with the Washington State
Department of Transportation.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION QF UTILITIES
1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
2. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to
RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, ttus condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94.
3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit
is required.
4. Applicant is required to sign a Sewer Connection Ageement.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT .
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
HEC Qrder for ZE-22-94 Page 6
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project, and individual service
will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authorized." 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the
State Buildings Code Act. Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS
ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS;
BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTTON TYPE; OCCUPANCY
CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY
CODE REGULAT'IONS. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not limited to the
following:
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprink.lers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activiries.
3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking
areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions.
4. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of
dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills
occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these
surfaces.
5. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article, V requires that a Notice of Construction and
Application for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the
construction, installation or establishment of air pollurion source. This includes
fue41 fired equipment (oil, natural gas, etc...) that has an input raring greater that
400,000 BTt1/hour and many other industrial/commercial activities. Because the
Notice of Construcaon approval process can be lengthy, if any such equipment is
being installed, the applicant should file the Notice of Construction as early as
possible to avoid potential delays to the project.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 7
. .
. ~
,
.
. .
6. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV requires registrarion with this agency.
7. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.).
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. Due to the undefined uses proposed in this Regional Business (B-3) rezone request and
the potential traff'ic impacts on the Barker Road/I-90 Interchange, WSDOT in
conjunction with Spokane County Engineers requires that development, beyond the
presently proposed nut factory and related maze, address traffic impacts once a
proposed use is defined. This would necessitate that the applicant prepare a traff'ic
analysis to document that adequate capacity is available at the interchange to
accommodate the proposed development. If after review of this analysis it is
determined that adequate capacity does exist WSDOT will certify this in writing to the
County. If adequate capacity does not e3cist it will be the responsibility of the applicant
to create the needed capacity before the proposed project moves forward. In either case
adequate capacity must be available before any building permits are issued for this
property (excluding the nut packing factory and the related maze).
2. That the applicant enter into the proposed Roa.d Improvement District (RID)/County
Road Project (CR.P) which is being formed by Spokane County Engineers in
conjuncrion with WSDOT to provide for the improvement of Broadway Avenue and the
realignment of Broadway Avenue at Barker Road.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 8
A ^ Ii • •
ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion, APPROVES DENIES the application of Gene Cohen for the Zone
Reclassif"ication from Regional Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) and
Light Industrial (I-2) for foal product manufacturing, retail sales and those uses
allowed in the proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2) zones
as described in the application ZE-22-94.
Motion by: Seconded by:
Vote: UNANIlViOUS TO APPROVE DENY TBE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
IVARING EXANiINER CON'IlVViITI'EE
HEREBY ATTEST TO TBE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE
CHAIR
ATTEST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
By JOHN W. PEDERS4N
Senior Planner
DATE
Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, ariy aggrieved party has the right to appeal this
written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10)
calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will
be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of Counry Commissioners,
West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$210 processing fee payable to
the Spokane County Treasurer.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at (509) 456-2205.
HEC Order for ZE-22-94 Page 9 ,
r
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# ZE-022=94.2A
Reiated File # ( )
Date to Revicw 6-23•94 Tirue # 5
Date to AA & DR 54-94 Time 1:15
Date Received 4-22•94
Project Name &3 To 8-3-1-2 FOOD PROC.fSSING-PREM]ER PKG-'I'RANCO No. Lots 1 No.Acres S
-SectfoRn - Township - Raage
SITE ADDRESS 19401 E BROADwAY-E BARKER PARCEL # 17555-0410
Applicant's Name GENE COHEN-TRANCO INDUSTRIES Phone # 455-3520
.
Address PO BOX SS-SPOKANE WA 99210 Work # 535-0010
,
Date Conditions mailed T~
~
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE V NO W S SCHOOL 356
. Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planaiag Contact Person STCVE DAVENPQItT Phone # 456-2205
~ ~ -
Fate SuUmitted Description Initials
- -
AGREEMENT TO PAY TEES COMPLE7ED & COPY "TO ACCOUNITNG
FINAi. PLAT F;EES COMPLE7ED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
/ NOTICE TO PUDLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLFTED - OR NEEDS TU BE SIGNED
/ / DE:SIGN DEVIAT[ON SUBMI`ITED
ALTERATION PO PLAT - I3LOCKS & LOTS
/iWAHEARING EXAM „4APPROVED _DENIED-APPEALFD BHC / PRQJECT _APPROVED DENIED
.
~
•
eview. ar
N
~ Tranc.o Rezone
woo. . , : ~
Ei
.
. . . .
N • ' '
L 0 t24
~ ' ~ . ~ • • . , .
O W' ~ . ~D~►t~ yt .
. °D
W u ~ ~ • Nv '
> ~ • .
" 4 8Su 86 ~~7 186 ~9 190 I° 1
192 193 194 195 I 197 198 199 200 241 803 204 x
~
Y E L L AV jig'Gr'mnoGres Sc}~oc~l ~ ~ .R. R• .
t~la+me tary) o ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . .
~ ! . a: o. • a - . ~ .
t
1.._ _ ~ . A . . . . .
N BOpN
AET
•i Q ~ • .
~i ATALDD;,,.~.~,►~.:..: ~
s . . . . . ~
F R E E WA Y . ~ ~ v• .
tit°;~~~.:.y:~ . . •
, `~`s.f~<t 1 T • •i U L -dw •
_ ~ U K i f s .
17
r r-J r)
O.
.
t JNT~ pl0-
. , ~ ta~ . F•~ ~ ~ ~ .
E
. ~Pp'` A . •
L.Y03
. . . ~ .
~ . . ~ .
.
A`LEY MIA .
. • ~ .
i w ~J/~ ~ • • ~
I .E• t►L Y AV , •
~ ci ' pM O
.'iv~
. : ~
. . l,a. .
. . .
, o ~ I IUD
SPRAGUE - AVE ~
o FIRST A'
. ar - • S E ~ O N O q JE, . ' ~SfA~IE~ ' '
. • V
Y N.
. W ' ' • , ~ J
FOURTN I~►VE. ~ - • Q~ • / ~ R.
m FOII
~ _ !
2 C- _ ~ - - -
- - - - ~3 ~ ~~q
,
~ -
- ,
~ ~ .
_ ~
i
` `
~ ~ •
~ - . ^ .
1 ~ .
•
~ -
t-
`
w
AM, "
Washington State District 6
Department of Transportation . 2714 North Mayfair Street
Duane Berentson Spokane. LVA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation (509) 456-3000 iFax (509) 456-3489
. ; May 18, 1994 , ~~YN'~( ~ ~ ~~I~~ • ,•if~~n° Mr. Steve Davenport
- -
Spokane County Planning
West 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re: Premier Packing B-3 Zone Change
Request
Dear Mr. Davenport:
In regard to the above development, the applicant is asking for a B-3 rezone to accommodate
a nut packing facility and other unknown uses which the B-3 zoning would allow. Due to the
limited ability of the present Barker Road/I-90 Interchange to accommodate additional traffic
and the traffic generation potential of the unknown B-3 uses, WSDOT and the County
Engineers working in conjunction with the applicant requests that the following conditions be
. applied to this zone change:
1. Due to the undefined uses proposed in this B'-3 rezone request and the potential traffic
impacts on the Barker RoadlI-90 Interchange, WSDOT in conjunction with Spokane
County Engineers requires that development, beyond the presently proposed nut factory
and related maze, address traffic impacts once a proposed use is defined. This would
necessitate that the applicant prepare a traffic analysis to document that adequate capacity
is available at the interchange to accommodate the proposed development. If after review
of this analysis it is determined that adequate capacity does exist WSDOT will certify this
in writing to the County. If adequate capacity does not exist it will be the responsibility of
. the applicant to create the needed capacity before the proposed project moves forward. In
either case adequate capacity must be available before any building pernvts are issued for
this properiy (excluding the nut packing factory and the related maze).
2. That the applicant enter into the proposed Road Improvement District (RID)/County
Road Project (CRP) which is being formed by Spokane County Engineers in conjunction
with WSDOT to provide for the. improvement of Broadway Ave. and the realignment of
Broadway Ave. at Barker Road. . .
If the above conditions cannot be agreed to, WSDOT would ask that a traffic analysis be
prepared and that it be included in the SEPA documentation for this project to address the
traffic impacts for the highest and best use of this site. < Y_
~ • ' r
x
Mr. Davenport
May 18, 1994
Page 2 , If you have any questions regarding the above comments please feel free to contact Leonard
Cash in our District Planning Office at (509) 456-3996.
Sincerely, .
J.C. LENZI
District Administrator .
L
, By: LEONARD CASH, PE
District Planning Engineer
JCL
LCC/gjf c ~~c: a_t_ Harper, Spokane County Engineers~?
• r *
OF=F7 C:F ClF TFiF COUN'TY ENC IN~ER
S!'Qk::AiUE C:(]Uh1TY p WAaH T N.t"aTC]N
.7 une 10, 1994
T~.~. Spokane C~~-unty Plai-inii1g I~~partment (C:Ltrrent F'1aririinq
Administrator )
•
Frclmu 5pcnk-ane County lCnqineer' s Departme nt ~
Sub.jectd Londita-Dns of Approva1 Zone Chanqe hlod ZE:.:':::''=i4
App 1 i r_~..~rit s Name Tran cc-
~ecticin 17 , l" c-w nship 25 hJ q!Ran ge45 EWh1
re:_Zoni.ng
The fc~ lclWl.fl(~ ~~CoC1d1.t1of1s cif AppY-DVc~l" f-wIi'' tNIe abclVe 1`'efeYEf1CE'd : -DflE..'
r_h•iarige are sLtbmitted •t---) i:l-iQ Spokane County I-iearinq Fxamzner Gomrni.ttee
foY 111C 1Lls.l.c-fl 1n ti"Ie "Pl.anninq RE(,ciYt" c111d "Fincl:inqs c11"1Cl oi"dE'Y " -a-f
f: t~~ e pub1 ic I-jPar i n g <s c I-iedLi 1 ed Ji_tne v 9 1994d
E36A Pr ior to a. asi_tan c e iDf a bLti 1 d i i-iq permit orat t he reqi-te~t of t I-= e
County r nct i n eer i n con..l un c tic-n w i. t h a G~~-Lin-t y RoarJ P ro..j ect/ Road
Irnprovement DiStrirtq whichever- action cc-Imes firs{:o
E 36 A p p 1 i c a n t a f i a1 1 d edai. c: ate 60 feet cin Hod ges Fa0~.~ d fc-r r i q htcit way
purpose5 0
F38 App1 i cant sha:! 1 cledi. cate an appl a.ciable raciii_ts iz-n Esr--_-adway_6ver~~~~P
anci hiodg2_-_Ri:-,.d.
F'rior to r• e1eG~ ~e o-f a l•a Li 7ld:i rig p e r m i. t ori_t se of tI-ie p rop e r t y
~roposecJ:
E40 A c cess perm i ts fi^)rapp roac hes t-D the Coun t y R~~~ ad Sy s t e m s ha]. l be
obtained -frc-rn t1-ie Coi_inty Ei-igineer.
E43 Applicant shr~l:l submi.t for t..~pprova1 by the Spokane C:ounty
rngiiieer rclad, draina-qe ~~nd e"1CCe~s pl.ana.
E~44 1'he app:l icant G:,hal. 1 submit for G~pproval by tt-ie Spokane CrJunty
Enc7.i.rieer ~~nd thE Swo€::~.-~ne County I-Ipalti-i Di<stri.ct a detaileci
C: of Tl bl t'1 @d'cof 1"s1. t t-? seW c.= gE 5ySte(Tl plaf'1 a[°1 Cj 5i_t Y f aC E' W 2tE.' Y d15 F:l o5 al
p1an f~~~ r the e n t a. ~e pro, jeet cir ~DOrti ontherecif i. f t he
de v e:! -Dpmerit is p h-~ ~~eda
p a t'!e
E 4 %5 A parF::inq pl.an and traffic eirc►_i1citi-Dn p1an shall. he sijbma.f:ted
and approved by tt~~e Spoa::ane COLtnty Eric7incer. Tt-ie rJesi.gn9
].ocation and arranqement of parking stal ls shal1 he in
al:Col"dal"1Ce Wlth stctlldclY'd eriqirieeririq pYc1Ct1Ces« PaVlI'lC( oY
si_tyrfaG.ing as zkpproved iay -ti-ie C.;our7ty Engirieer will be reqLtired
f-= j1" 2 (l y p or t i. c-ifl of thE' p1'' o,) eC t W h1. ch'I is t be oC C up i e d -::i1"
traveled by veha.clps
E:46 TcF const ruc: t t t-ie roadw~..~y imprc-vements statec! i°ierein, the
ap w 1 i. cant m ciy, w itI-i tl-ie a pprov~..a 1!.-jf t he C-Dj_tn t y En gi n eer y Jox i-i in
and he w i 1 1 i n c1 tc, part i. c i. pat e i n an y pe•t iticinor r~s01utx-m,n
w ha. c I°~ pur pose i s t he f orm ati on of a Road I m pr -::-v em en t Di. stnic t
(RID) ~-Dr said impr-Dvement pl_irsLtc-int tc- RCW 36.88, as ampncJecl.
SpOa:: ane Goun t y w i1]. not pa r t a. ci pa te i n tl-ie cc-st o fthese
improvemen•trJ. Tf•iis pr-Dvisic-n is applicabl.e t---j that portion of
Bro~.~ (Jw ay A v p nLte t---l b e rea]. i ca ned to an ci i n r_ 1+_i din q Barke r IRc-<a d o
E47 As an a1.ternative method e_-f cc:-nstrUct:i.nci the r~-Dad improvements
<.s•~ated herein, tl-ie applicant may, with the apprc-val ---If the .
Coi..tnty Enqineer9 acr.omplish the ro-jad imprc-vemeri1:s s-ta-ted her°ein
by .j01ining and pari:icipatinq in a r-DIAi7ty I~-Dad Pro.ject (CRP) tc-1
the extent ---)f the reqi_tired a.m~rovement. apoa::ane C:coi_tnty w.i.:l :l not
participate in the c~~~~t of ti-~~~e impri::-vements. TI-iis pr-_-wision
i.s app7.icable to that portic-In of Broadway Avenue to be rea:Liqned
tc- an d i i-ic 1Ltd i i-iqBar E:: e r P, oa d.
E48 "rhe cla-nstri_iction of tt•ie r-,~adway impr-DwemPnts stated herei.n sr►a11
be aCco:_implished as approveci by tl-ie ~~ok-ane County EnginePr4
~50 The C-Di_tnty Enqineer haa (1esa.gnated Typi~al Roadway Secta.c-Ir7
hlumber Qne,__L~j-f_!3_l.Acce<.~~ ~stai-idard for trie impr-m.vement -_If Hocigns
l~oDarJ whiel-i is arJ.jacent t--l tl-ie pr~~~posed developmente 1"his wil.l
reqkAire the ~.~dditi-Dn ofapprOXimate1y ftn cof aspha1tu Cl_tr-ba.i-ig
and sidPwaik: must Lalso be Cc-InstrUcted.
E5C-) The C-p-urity Enq.ineer has desiqnated "i"ypa.ca1 Fioaclway 5ec_tior-i
hlurnlaer Onej.__L_~w~c:R].~Accesr standard fi-Dr the improvement cof
Broadway_6v!E-?numm« wl-iich ~is cid.}acent t-D the pr•oposPd cievelopment.
"f'I-tis~wi11 reqi_tire the adcJit.a.on of varying anounts r-If asphalt
a1c~nq the fro11tagEa of the deve].opment„ Ci_frbinq anci sa.c_iew~..~1k mi_ist
a1 so b e cc-inst ruc ted o
E5:1 A7.1 reciLti.red impYovemerits shc-i11 c:onform to tt-ie ci_trren~t Sta-te cIf
WasI-iinq-tnri Stat-iclard Specifiications for Roaci and Br i(JqP
cOnstI'Uction and c-ithc-~r c-ipplicab1~ cc-ja.inty stanciards and/~~~r
adcipted reao1i..it.a.cins per~taininc b~er~:aa.nx~~q i:~~ F~cnar~ S~tt~nciard<.~ ai-~~
St-Drmwater ManagemerZt in effert at thP d~~~e of cO1-1StrUcti-Win,
un1ess otherwise approvt=d by tl-ie G~~-unty Engineerp
r)
E5; R-Dadway standarcis, typical ro~.~dway sectic-Ins and drainaqe pl.an
3"C}qiji rements at''C fouf1d 1.1"1 ~pokafle E{oal`'Cj Coufl'~~ Commissioners
r~so 1Lition 80µ1592 as amcnder..l and arc, ar,apl icaiJle tc- this
prop os a]. .
E58 N-::- r. r-Inst ruction wr-IrI:: i a to beperfior med w i t h.i. n t h E exi s t i riqor
prop~ ~sed r iqhtof wayi_tntil. a permit has ha ee n iss i_ted by t h e
Ccii_t rit y Eriqineer. A 1 1 wc-Irk w i t hi n t he pub.l ic rc_iacl r i. q ht -wif way
sub.ject tr_1 i.nspectaion aiid approval !ay the C~~-unty Enqineer-.
E59 A1 1 reqi_tirecl construction wi-t hi n t r~ ~exi. st i. ng or p r• poaed pl_tbli. c
riyl-,t c-if way is t---- be completed prior to the 1''elG-'aSe of a
bi_ii dinci permit c-r- a b-Dnci in an cimc-tint estim~ted by the C-D+_int:y
E(1g111ee1r to CoVeY the Cc-5t of i=ol'1Si:Y'uCt'lc--l"1 o1'' improvements sl"Iall
be fii1ed with the Cc--unty Engi.neern
E59 Applicaiit shal.l si.gn and recorc1 Spr-1E::ane Coi..tnf;y I~-Dtic~ to the
PLtb 1 i c hl o. 6 w hi c h s p ec_ i f:,i. es •t hQ fo]. 1ow i nq o
Thl t? c-W 11 e1'' (s) > i Y suC C E' ea so1'' (5.) .l I`1 1. I-itf..-' Ye.s"a t aQ Y E' e
aLtt hcirize t heCOLtnty to p1 ac e thei r n a m e(s) ona pe t i t i-:-.tn for
t he fc-ir m~.~ tionofi a IRiDaci T m prc-ivem E= nt I) a. stri c t (R 1 D) b y t he
peti-ti-Dn metr,or~ pursuant tc- Ci-iapter ;;6n 88 RCWq wh:i.ch peti~ic-In
in c 1i_tdes tI-~ e ow ner(s) {a roperty o I f a R I D is for m ed b y either t{~~~ e
pe titiciri ~.-ir- r~ ~ so1 Ltti on m e thr-ld , as p r c-v i d ec! f ---Ir i n C i~~ apt er 36.88
RCW, t I-ieow nerc: s~ ~suC Ce5 So1' t. a.7 f j_tr-t I-ier a q re e a (1) t I-iat t he
impr~-::lvement or con5trj_iction cc-~ntemp:lated with:in the pr-r-1posed RID
is -feasxble, (:::7_') f;hat the benefits t-D be derived from tl-te
fi-_-rm~tion of -the Rir.) by the prc-pei-ty rnc1Ltded therei.n, toqethetir
with t t-ie amountof ~-~t n y Coi_tn t y par t x cipation q exceec~ s ti-te c~~~ st
~.~nc1 expen~e of fc-~frmation o-f the RID. ancl (13; that tt-ie prr-~perty
witl-iii-i tl-ie proposed R:CD is si_tffic.i.ently cleve1cipede Provided9
fur, t heir , t hec-w r7er(s) or~ suc: c: ~~sor(s) sha1 1 r e t~.~ a. n the r x ght, as
author iZeci i_i n d ei- RC W 36.88.090, t'=' '=-b..l ec:t to a ri y asS essrn p nt ---:-ri
the property ~s a res►_tlt of the improvements ca11ec~ fc►r i.n
cr-In, jun r_ t a. on wit h t h e formation r-If the RI T? bye.i. t I-ier etztic-In-::-r
r~sol ut:ion methoc! +_tncier Chapter 36.88 RCWn "ff-iis provision as
applicable to tl~~~~~ portion of Brcnadway Aveni_t~ tc- be realiqnec~ ~~~t
and a. n e 1 ud i ri q E;ar a: er Roaci.
E'DO T here m aye:•; ist i..tti1 ities9 eitI-ier unde r qroun d c-troverhead y
affic?ctinq tF~~ Sub.ject prc-p~rty, including property to ae
decJi c~.~ tP ci r<s et s i d e forfutur e ae quisitic--n . S p-Dk: a~~ County
a5 aufTl es i'1 o f i n a n cia1 c-lb 1 i gat ionf(.-i1'' c"1d,J L[ S t[TI C I"1 t5oY' Y' @lcnC: atl. oP'1
r-eqarding i:hese i_itilit.i.eso Applirani~ shc-uld checa:: wa.th tFie
appl i r_able i_t-ti l. ity purvey~::ir and ~16he Spc_:,F=:ane CiDunty Engineer tcl
determine wliether applican-t r-jr the utility i.s resp-_-nsib:le f-::-r
pc'tC7€' 4
ad.]u ~'atf11~C1~; ~~Y Ye1! ~Crltl.c-i~ C~=~ s'~a cl1f~ ~:-w~ (T1~°'~~iP arr~~nqements f! ~Y ~llly
nec~~sary work:.
Spec ial. Con ci i f: ionsp
A► t °t t~~ e ti rn P~_--f: pri nti n g of t hese ccon d i. t:i ons Br~ i-jc-kcl way A v e n ue is
st<;_k•te facility i_ti-idtr cc-Intro.1 -MIf the Stat~ ~epartmen~ ----f
Tr~.~nspc-rtat ion. I)UTy SpoE::anQ Go+_inty lEnqi.neerinq aricl v~--trious property
ota' f i E? Y a 1'I t.~ Ve beefl WoY' k1 11(? togE' theY to reaL.1. Q i7 B1r ctr_i dtti! c°11/ AVeCl i..12 , and 1. 11
thL process Brcladway AvenLte wi 1 1 be tLirned bG~ck t~~~ Spoa::arie Countyo
W ithout the r e t:.~ l. i q nrn e n t ofi~rcnad way A veni_~ ~po-t entia1 1 y ori l. y riG ht-i n
and tLt r rii n q mov c rn ent c> wou1 cJ be a1 1-w[we dfrom BarF:: er~ Rcia d.
~pok:~.~ne Co+_inty E-ngineer-ing reqi_tires tI-~at a traffic analysis be dr-Ine
prior to any bLRildi.rig permxts be'ing issi_tPCI ori ti-~at portion ._-)f the
PYc-poSeC:~ --ciIlr CFtaIlgC-' ti`iat 5hcnW..-a 17c, 5peC:.l.f1C LtiBP_5p Ti"11..r'a a17alyrl.s
sha11 be coordinatecJ wa.th tF-ie W~.~shi.nqton 5tate Department of
Tran~por tat icin u
r
~
AtML
Washington State District 6
~ Department of TMansportation 2714 North ivlayfair Street
, Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Duane Berentson •
Secratary oi Transportation (509) 456-3000
' Fax (509) 456-3089
May 3, 1994
Mr. Steve Davenport
Spokane County Planning
1026 West Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Re: Tranco Indust-ries Zone Reclass
SR 90
Dear Mr. Davenport: - Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above mentioned development. The
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the following
comments: • WSDOT requires a traffic analysis be conducted for the intersections of
Broadway Avenue/Barker Road and I-90Barker Road to show this development
can be safely accommodated prior to this zone change being placed on the public
hearing schedule. This traffic study will need to take into account the already
approved developments in this area. This traffic analysis will need to be included
with the SEPA documents prepared for this zone change. Please contact
WSDOT and Spokane County on this matter. .
• If direct access to Broadway Avenue is deemed necessary, it must be approved by
WSDOT, as our records show this section of Broadway Avenue is still on the
State system. A valid WSDOT road approach permit must be obtained for direct
access to Broadway Avenue prior to the issuance of any building pernuts for this
project. Please be advised, WSDOT does not permit access to State facilities
without prior knowledge of the future use of the property.
• Due to the future need to widen I-90 in the Spokane Valley, WSDOT requests
that this development maintain normal setbacks to I-90. No variances should be
permitted which would allow less that normal required setback.
• Broadway Avenue will need to be reconstructed to County Road Standards. In
this area, the road will need to be built to the appropriate Spokane County Road
Standards, Typical Roadway Standards Section #1,.Loca1 Access Roadway. The
applicant will be re9uired to dedicate the necessary right of way, and to construct
the roadway across the site's frontage.
• WSDOT has recognized the eventual need to realign Broadway Avenue at Barker
Road to line up with the existing Barker Road on the west side. Developer
participation will be required for this improvement.
~ -
a
If you have any questions or need further information regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact Leonard Cash of our Planning Office at 456-3996.
Sincerely,
J. C. LENZI
. District Administrator
C~
By: LEONARD CASH, PE
District Planning Engineer -
JCL
. LCC:ja Project file
- ti
'
r
y r '
~
~
. ~
. ~ • •
\
l ~
~
l . , ~ ~
od
/L-
l~~ ~ . ,
~
' _ .
t
1~! Y
" C- x - •
k.~
7 O!
_ • , ~ ~ -
CA--~ .
Al; 4F ~
~
~ AWJ
i~.~
. 6, ~1
~f r
~
.
~
~
~
{
. (
tC!
. " ~ `
.
0 1
. .
)41e
A,)4~F ~ ~
. o.9 .
~ .
~1~..
~
r...
i
4
i
`
'
.
~S
- ~ ~ \Vi ~
rr
A.)
~ ~
. \ ,
~
. .
` . _
, . Cx • .
. WSC>
' . ~ esT
L:;>
E~ \
- . ^
o0
1
~
~
. ~ . -
~ ~ -
Ct _
~ .
.
LAJ5
~
A' ,
~ ~,7c~ rlt}~ 4r
2 a-~
J
~
,
. . OT-
~
9~r
` ► !
~ ` 5~ ~►~2~' ' ~~E~
~ , f ~■y~.1
/
~ Q0
~
~ .
.
i
~
w
OI"'F1 CE OF Tf'~~ ~OUIV r Y EIVGIIVEER
Sla(Jk=:ANE COUhlTY Y WA5HI iVGTCJIV
ila y -49 :l 9`3 4
'1"o: 5poa::arie County Pl.ani-iirig Department (Current Pl.anninq
Aclinin:d.strator )
..a
F r o m.- ~aF~ ~~►~::ane C~~~_intY Ei19i.i~eer 9<s %~eF~ar-tmentQ& ~ •
S u b.je ct o Conclita c-ns of App~-ova.l Zone Ghange No4 Un. _~ssigned
App3.icari ts Name Tra nc-:-
Section 17, Tcjw nsha. p ~2!~ N, Ran ae 4; EW M
reW_Zoni.n~
Th~ folloW 1. t'1 g "Cond1. t7 c~ I'1 s of App1'' oV cl l" i o1'' ttl E' c.~ k? -DV Ea Y' e'fei'' e I'1 C eCI z.-Df 1 e
change are si_tbmit#:eci to tF~~ ~pokane rciunty Pl~.~nninq Department f--Ir
i n c 1us:i. c--ri :i ntF~ e De s i. gn Review Me cting schecJ uled MaY_LT.:.. _ 1'J':~ 4n
E ,':P(`, A i'r i or tc, issi_tai-ic e of a L LR i l(Ji riq per m i t or c-o t t I-ie r P q Li eSt Of tI-r e
Coi_tnty En ga. r~ ~er in cc-n. jun c tion w i. t h a Cclunty Roacl F'r o, ject/ Road
Imprc.-vement I7istrictq whichrE=ver action c~nmes firsta
E36 Applice ar7 t Gy hal1 ded i. cat e 60 fee-t on h-i oci ges Rc-oaci for riq ht of way
p u r pos esa
E38 App1ic:ant shall deda.c~..ate an ar.~pla.cable radi.us con Brciadway
Serv i ce_R-Dad ~.~nci I+Dd q25__Fd!:)add
Pr i-Dr t r eJ. e~.~ se of a bi_ti1 ri i n q pe rm i f: or i_is e of tI~~ e pr opP r ty as
prc-pc.ised a
E4() Ac cess qer m i t~ forzipproac: he_, tc- t he Cc-Linty Road 5 y~tem s ha1 1 t~ e
obtaineci friDm the County Enqi.ner.~r•a
E41 Access permi.ts and imprc-vemeril:s ~-:j Broraclway._Servi.re._Road mUSt be
apprcived by the Washinc~ton State Department of Transpoirtation
(YY s,S)oDe lJ u1 n ) ■ . p
E-4; Applic:ant sha11 sUbm.i.t for° approval by tNEe Spi---11::anL-- Got_tnty
Crigi.neer r-Dadq drainage t..~nd ~.~.r_c~~s pl.ansp
E-4•41. The ~..~pp1ic:ant yha:Lt submit for apprc_-va1 by thF Sp~~-kanr Count;y
F n gi neer an d theSF)-_Ik: a ne CiWiur7 ty I-( p a 1-t I-► Dis-t -r- iet det ailed
CofTl t7 .1. fl E? d o!"i -p1!. t~seW aCa S)! 5tetYl plcl 11 aCl C) sLt Y'fct C E' WateY d1. spoS al
•
pa(a e 2
plari for the entire pr-W-.jec~ -::-r p-rIrtx-::-n there-:--if if the
clevel.-Dpment is ptiasec.14
E4.5 A par E:: i ng p1an an d fi r-affi c c.i. rc: U1~- ti. ory p1an sf•i~.~a :l 1 b e SUt,m itted
t..~iid appr-_►ved by the Spi_ik:ane Cotanty Enqi.neero The ciesiqn,
1c-ca-ticin and arrangemcnt cif park:ing =ita11s stia11 be iri
acc-Drr.i~.~nce with standard enqineerxnc7 pracl:icesa Pavi.nq or
surfaCa.nq as appri-Dved by the Cc-unty Enqineer wi11 be requ«.recJ
fo1'' e3 fl y poi'' t1oI"1 of the pYo,a eCt W ri 1 Ch iS to be oC Gi_t p1ed ciY
-traveled by vehxc1.es
E48 -rr~~ construc:1:ion o-f -thP r~~adway improvements sta-ted herei.n shall
be aec-Dmplished aa approveci hay -the Sp-::,E::ane Coi-tnty Enqineeru
E50 TFie Coijnty Enqineer 1•~~s desiqnate~..~l 7'Ypir.a1 roadway ceeticin
Ni_tmber C]j-ie,. __Lcjcal_Access st~.~ndarei fcIr tr-ie improvemPnt ci-f Wocig~_
Rc-j~..ad which is ad.jacent tc-i tl-ie pri'Dposeci devel.opment. TFii<.s will
reqi_tire thP addxtion of appr-o:•:iinatel y3'--' ft. of a-spha1 t
becI i. ni-ii i-iGai: ~~i.-jaJ w a y AvenLte Ser v ic: e r~~-c-kd an d cr-Intinuia. n g south
t'='mApplewayv
E51 All required improvements sha:11 conform to the current 'State of
Washinqton Standard Specifications for R---Iad and Br-idgP
r_onstruct;ion and otrier applicable c~~lunty 5taridarcis c-inci/or
adclptPd rr~so1.utiona pertazning per-taining to R~ ~ad Standarcis anci
c_i~--_-rmwater• Iylariaqemerit in ef•fec_t at tne ciat~ .--)fi constrLtctioriy
i_iril.e~~ ~~-thPrwis~ approved by -ti-ie County Eriqineera
E55 Roadway stanclarcis, typa.t_a1 re-nadw~-~y secticiris and draii-iaUe ple-tn
1" e Ca i_t .7l Y t? fTl ef1 t5 aY e fc-i_tn d 1. fl Spok: aCl f? Boc.~ Y' t~ ~~-oi_l I-1 ty CotYl fi.L 5s1c-ifl e1' S
r° eso:l lj-t i. c-n 80° 15'J 2' s ame rici P r.l n ci rPapp1 i cab1~ tcf t his
p 1' oposa1 a
E58 Nc- cc-nst rLtc t ion wor k: is tc-, b e p er~ foir med w i t t-ii n the exi s•ti n q or
pro~-::-se ci r- :i ghitof way un t i:! a perm i. t ha<.y, been ~~sue ci tiytI-te
CiDun t y En cii nee r. AI:l worE:: wit f-ii n tt-ie pl_tbli c road ra. ght-_If way i. ~
sub.jer_~ to inspectic--n and ~.~ppr-_ival by tI-~~ ~~~iunty CnqiilePr~~
E59 A11 reqi_iirecl ccEnstructa.on within the exist:ing c-r proposed publi.c
r i qht ~_If wayi<.s tci be com p1 iry ted p r ior t-µl ti-ie re 1ease ofa
ta uai. 1 dinqpeir m i t cira Facon J i. ri an am~~.unt P sti rn ated h y the C: clunty
EIl Ca al. I"1 eeY' tc, CoV F? Y tl"1(? Ci=~ ~t of CoI`15 tYuGt1on oY' ifri p1' +Dv e mei-its sl"I a1l
be fi.1er_I wi.th the CoLtn•ty Enqineern
J
paq C n
._1
E'Di a 1' he re m~.~ yexi~t ut i l.a. tic s 9 ea. t hc r UI"t CJ P Y q Youi'1 CI orover head,
affectinG tt~~~ sub.jec:t proper•ty9 i.ricli..tciinq pr~~-perty to be
dedxr_~.~ted ---Ir set as.i.de f-Dr future acquisitic--no S p o i::a n ga ~---j i_t nt y
asa uiTi eS nc, fi iian c.i a '1 -r-blI. C7 c? t ioI"1 fc-1`' c1 dy) ustf Ti efl ~ s oY 1'' elocci t1. c-j('1
reqartJing -thlese i_ttil.itiesn Appla.cant should c1rtecF:: wa.tl-i tl-ie
appl:ir.ab1E I_Itility pLtrveycir and tr~~~ ~pokane Cc-unty Enqi.neer to
determi.ne wl-~etl-ier applicani: or the i_~tili.ty is respori 9ible fc-r
c°1dju5t(Tl P I`1 ---IY' Y' elciC at:A. of l C: o5ts EAI"1 C~ to m ake aY' lr cl Cl getYl e1"1 ts f-w-Y' cl f ly
I"leCeSsaYy W----IY'ko
Spec i a 1 C; ondi. t ir-In s o
Broadway AvenL« Service R,_I,:kd is not a Ccji_inty Road bLtt stil:l a state
fac:ilityr Reqi_tiremei-its relatiriq to im~~rovements tc-I that facility
wi.1 1 be assiqrieci by tt-ie ~~tate Departmerit of T'ran~port:atir-Inm
Additional an~.~;J.ysi.s may Fae reqi_ti.rerJ for t;l-iz= turninq movements from/to
BarE:: er Roac1 frcom t he Broac~ way A V E? P'1 uC? Service R~~-adp
, 3 •
ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeqReport Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 4 _ 12:50:12 26 APR 1994 0
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... .
0 06.520 ADAMS RD U 14 PAVED 440
0 06.640 BURNS RD U 14 PAVED 44
0 06.770 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 440
0 06.840 ST CHARLES RD (START U 14 PAVED 44
0 07.020 SULLIVAN RD U 14 PAVED 440
0 07.290 MOORE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24
0 07.510 CONKLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 200
0 08.020 FLORA RD U 16 PAVED 20
° BROADWAY AV (END) 08.510 LONG RD U 16 PAVED 200
000325 BROADWAY AVE (START) 00.000 COLEMAN RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
° BROADWAY AV 00.060 LILY RD U 19 PAVED 220
° BROADWAY AV (END) 00.080 BROADWAY AV
000418 BROADWAY AV (START) 00.000 BARKER RD U 19 PAVED 220
000417 BROADWAY AVE (START) 00.000 FLOR.A RD U 16 GRAVEL 12
° BROADWAY AVE 00.480 LONG RD °
0 00.730 GREENACRES RD
° BROADWAY AVE (END) 00.990 BARKER RD °
000492 BROADWAY AVE (START) 00.000 WEST END TO SWING ST U 19 PAVED 36
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) °
a ,aaaa~.~ ,aaaaa ,.,,aa.,a„aaaa~,„aaaa_,aa~~,,,aaaa,aa,,aaaaa,,,,,aaa,,,aa,,a
t3.aa..aaa~._ae..,aaaaa..,..._,.ae-,-aaaaaa ..,.,...,aaaaaaaaa,~,a.aaa,~.aaa
a ~q
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page °ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewert~eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 512:50:14 26 APR 1994 0
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info......... .
° BROADWAY RD 00.030 SWING ST (START) U 19 PAVED 360
a 00.070 ORMOND CT (START)
° BROADWAY RD (END) 00.100 EAST END OF ROAD °
0
05 Records Processed • 0
0
" o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List °.,,,~°Use,Direction~Keysto,View,Report (Press [F1] for help) °
flaaaaa~ea aaaa , aeaaaaaaa a aaaaaaa aa aaaa a , aaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(;
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page °
~
, ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewer4eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 1 12:50:42 26 APR 1994 0
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
000433 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #1 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 400
° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #1 00.020 JACKSON DR R 09 PAVED 40
000434 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #2 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R 09 PAVED 400
° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #2 00.050 NORTH END OF ROAD '
000435 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #3 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R 09 PAVED 400
° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #3 00.050 NORTH END OF ROAD
000230 BARKER RD (START) 00.000 32ND AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 180•
° BARKER RD 01.820 8TH AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
0 02.080 4TH AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 180
0 02.210 2ND AVE (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 18
0 02.330 SPRAGUE AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 220
0 02.510 LABERRY DR (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 22
0 02.530 BOW AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 220
0 02.570 APPLEWAY AV U 14 PAVED 36
0 . 02.640 COWLEY AV (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 02.730 ALKI AV U 14 PAVED 36
0 02.800 BROADWAY AVE (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 02.830 BROADWAY AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) °
uaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaciciciaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaciaaaciaaaaaaaaaaarr
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page °
ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;
°PAGE 2 12:50:51 26 APR 1994 0
°Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Loq Info..........
0 02.860 I 90 EASTBOUND RAMPS U 14 PAVED 360
0 02.930 I 90 OVERPASS U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 24
0 , 02.950 CATALDO RD (START) U 14 PAVED 360
0 03.060 BOONE AV (END) U 14 PAVED 36
0 03.090 BOONE AV U 14 PAVED 360
0 03.150 SHARP AV (END) U 14 PAVED 36
0 ' 03.210 SINTO AV (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 03.270 MAXWELL AV (END) U 14 PAVED 36
0 03.340 MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 360
0. 03.400 AUGUSTA AVE (END) U 14 PAVED 36
0 03.460 BALDWIN AV (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 03.590 INDIANA AV (END) U 14 PAVED 36
0 _ 03.690 RIVERWAY RD (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 03.800 BR 5503 OVER SPOKANE U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 26
0 03.960 JACKSON DR (START) U 14 PAVED 360
0 ' 04.090 BUCKEYE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36
0 04.170 GRACE AV (END) U 14 PAVED 360
0 04.340 EUCLID AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef
°List „ °,,,,~,°Use,Direction,Keys~to View,Report~(Press,[F1],for~help)
fl& a&aaaeaaaaaae~aaaaaaaaa~c aaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaA ~.aa aaaaaaaa(;
°Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page 0
c
of
l~J
C:; r
\ S~~ ~,,J
.D
~ t
~t
. .
_ - ~ _ -
~ _ . r.-
4--
_ _ - -
- .~~T ~ y_~-,,. + _ ` " - _ - _ - _ _ . ---r .
~a_~r ...~._e- ~ . _
` _
,
Premier Packing Conipon4
.
P
. O. Box 55 • Spokone, Woshington 99210 ~
L
Fax Cover Sheet
~
Name:.~ _ . . . I
Please give this fax to: . .i. _ . _ . . ~
Compeny this fax is sent to is:
A short message from me to you....
~ A-^
- • '~~l.11.. ~ _ . ~~~-~.c~ . .
The number of pagres ttansrnitted after this cover page shoulci be:
(509) 455-3520 {phone}
t od 100 ~N~ (509) 455-3519 (fax) ~
dWOO DNI >oVd 831W38d 6 I 5C SSb 605 1 0 S ~ 90 CI-SO--b661
~
05/16 '94 07:45 ID:WSDOT "TSTP.ICT 6 FAX:509-456-;nQ9 PAGE 1
RE(,E, VtU
~ ` .
MA Y 1 1994
Counry E
ngineering
~
~ 1) Wc a'-o:~ o ve.~ )e y&7-ol-- tov1-7 47~
~iL/ jJ'
Mg 16 1994
y ~ y-3cl-74~
Mr, Steve Davenport
Spokane County Planning
West 1026 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
. Re: Premier Packing B-3 Zone Change
Request
Dear Mr. Davenport:
In regard to the above developmeni the applicant is asking for a B-3 rezone to accommodate
a nut packing facility and other unknown uses which the B-3 zoning would allow. Due to the
limited ability of the present Barker Roadll-90 Intetchange to accommodate additional traffic
and the traffic generation potential of the unknown B-3 uses WSDOT and the County
Engineet's working in conjunction with the applicant requasts that the following conditions be
applied to this zone change.
1. Due to the undefined uses proposed in this B-3 rezone request and the potential tratTic
impacts on the Barker Road/I-90 Interchange, WSDOT in conjunction with Spokane
County Engineers requires that development, beyond the presentty proposed nut factory
and related maze, address traffic impacts once a proposed use is defined. This would
necessitate that the applicant prepare a traffic analysis to document that adequate capacity
is avaitable at the interchange to accommodate the proposed development. If after tev;ew
of this analysis it is determined that adequate capacity does exist, WSDOT will certify this
in wtiting to the County. If adequate capacity does not exist it will be the responsibility of
the applicant to create the needed capacity before the proposed project moves forward. In
either case adoquate capacity must be available before any building permits are issued for
this property (excluding the nut packing factory and the related maze).
2. That the applicant enter into the proposed Road Jmprovement District (RID)/County
Road Project (CRP) which is being formed by Spokane County Engineers in conjunction
with WSDOT to provide for the improvement of Broadway Ave. and the realignment of
Broadway Ave. at Barker Road.
If the above conditions cannot be agreed to, WSDOT would ask that a traffic analysis be
prepared and that it be included in the SEPA documentation for this project to address the
traffic impacts for the highest end best use of this site.
05/16 '94 07:45 ID:WSDOT ^'STP.ICT 6 FAX:509-456-3009 PAGE 2
. ~
10AY~~D ~
Mr. Davenport J9gd
May 16, 1994 ~ouo~y fngin .
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding ihe above comments please feel free to contact Leonard
Cesh in our District Planning Office at (509) 456•3996. .
Sincerely,
J.C. LENZI
. District Administrator
By: LEONARD CASH, PE
District Planning Engineer
JCI.
LCC/gjf
cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
~ .
}
Tranco industrles
and
Premier Packing Company
P O 8ox 55; East 306 Trent Avenue ~
Spokane, Washington 99210
(509) 455-3520 phone ~
(509) 455-3519 fax ~
May 13, 1994 Spokane County Planning Department
Steve Norbiowski, Planner ;
Spokane Bullding Oepartment :
Public Works Building .
1026 West Broadway Spokane, W8 99260-0240 .
456-2205 phone
456-2243 fauc t
Reference to Tranco Industrles Zone Reclassification from Regional 8usiness (8-3) to ~
Regional 8usiness (6-3) end Light Manufacturing (I-2) Steve- I tried to reach you yesterday because we have a questlon you could answer for Greg Fig of ~
Washington DOT and Pat Harper of Spokane County Publ(c Worka. Time Is of the essence since today is the cutoff for being on the June hearing schedule.
At my Oeslgn Revlew Meeting on Wednesday, May 4th the QOT expressed concern over the I
proximity. of Broadway to the Freeway I-90 ramps. i
1 arranged a meeting Friday, May 6th in which NW Recreation (Bill Fishfader), Gordon Curry and
Lyle Johnson, myself, DOT (Leonard Cash and Greg Fig), and Publlc Works (Ver1e Smalo and
Pat Harper) attended. At that meeting the state and county agreed to return ownership of the road. At that meeting all partles agreed that we would torm a RiD end purchase the property
for allgning 6roadway wlth the intersecifon of Broadway going west (move It about 200' south).
Thls ►esolved the major issues and would allow me to go forward wlth a June hearing. ~
1
~
I
,
tOd t00 JINHdWOO 3NI>3dd 83IW~8d 6t5C SSb 605 1 3tr:90 ct-50-ti661
Letter to Steve Horbiowski
M ay 13, 199.4
Aeclassiflcatfon of Zoning
Tranco fndustries - 19401 Broadway Project
The only small Issue left was the pan of my project {just over 2 acres) that I was asking for 8-3
zoning. Many B-3 uses are not traffic intensive, but something iike a McDonaids might be
iraffic Intensive. Pat and Greg want to place a condition on that part of the property not usod
by The Nut Factory or related uses (such as a maze) to have a new user be reviewed regarding
ihe traff(c generated as ft speclflcally af#ects the freeway ramps. We hope this condition can
be wr(iten as en "Administrative RevieW' w{thout having to go through ihe entire public hearing
process since it is a minor pofnt.
So we are asking you to assist us with your wisdom on what is the proper way to accompllsh
this. Tlme is of the essence sfnce today is the cutoff for geriing thls conditlon worded so the DOT will accept my proposal and I can come down wlth a check. ! hope I can stlll gei on the
June hearing schedule.,., ~
A call to Pat Harper would probably give him some help in the wording of the contfhion. ;
Respectfully,
;
Gene Cohen
copy faxed to Pat Harper and Greg Fig
~
:
C
f
;
~
i,
Z
Z Od t 0 0 JMdWOO JN I >3Hd 83 I W28d 6 t 5 C S 5V 60S 1 6 ti~ 9 0 Ct-S 0-b 6 6 i
.
y '
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-22-94 TRANCOINDUSTRIES
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassificarion from Regional Business (B-3) to
Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industiial (I-2) for food product manufacturing, retail sales
and those uses allowed in the proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial(I-2)
zones.
. APPLICANT: Tranco Industries, Inc.
Gene Cohen
P O Box 55
Spokane, WA 99210
(509) 455-3520
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located north of Broadway Avenue, south of
Interstate 90, approxi.mately 2,000 feet east of Barker Road in Section 17, Township 25 North,
Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY PLA►NIVING DEPARTMENT
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environnzental Impact Statement
(EIS) is = required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of
a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must
be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., June 21, 1994, if they are intended to
alter the DNS.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLA,NNING DIRECTOR
By: Steve Davenport, Planner I
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Planning Department
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 ~
,1994 SIGNATU .
DATE ISSUED. • rndl aZ
/
O RBGARDING INVIRONMENI'AL LONCERNS ARE WII-OONIE AT THE BEARIlVG.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERNIINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10)
calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This
appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Health
3. Sgokane County Health District
w 4 m n wg, p • ktii I~1Qg-,.m'aqy/&, .Z~si.4i1&of ~'Il~ • Jl--'' !~"R~'`Tl il ~
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Parks Deparnnent
7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council
9. WA State Deparnnent of Transportation
10. Spokane Transit Authority
11. Central Valley School District '
12. Consolidated Irrigation District
13. Fire District No. 1
J
, -
~ ,
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 -1T
e•'
Z E
w 22w94
~
r.
SPOKANE ENVIR0104ENTAL ORu'INAIICE
(NAC.,197-11-960) Settton 11.10.230(1)
.
Environmental Checklis[
File tto. AIF-S-94
Purpose of Checkltzt:
The State Enviro Rsental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCV, requtres ali govern+iental agenctes to constder the envirorxnental impactz of a Droposal
before tiking Aecisions. An fnvironmentat impect Siatertrnt (EI5) must De prepared for all proposals with probaDle siqnificant adverse impacts on
tAe Quality of the envtrorroent. The purpose of this checkllst is to provide inforcnetion to he1D you and the agency identify impacts fron your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid irtpacts from tAe praposal. if it can be done) and to help the egency Ceclde whetner an EIS is required.
Instructlons for Applicants:
This envlronmental chetklist asks you to describe saae baslt inforrration about your proposal. Governmenta) aqencles use this checklist to determine
whether the environarntal impacts of your proposal are slgnffiCant, requiring pre9aratian of an E15. Answer the questtons briefly, with the most
pretise lnfornatlon knwn, or gtve the Dest descrlptlon you can.
`feu must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. in most cases. yw should be able to answer the questions
froa your own observations or projett plans w/thwt the need to hire experts. lf you really do not know che answer. or 1f a Question dces not apply
to your proposal, vrite 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to Lhe qutstions nav may avold unnetessary delays later.
Some Questions esk ebout governaental re9ulations. such as zoning, shoreline. anE lanCmark designatlons. Answer these questtons if you can. If you
have problews, the govermental agencies can assist you.
The checkltst queztlons apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do thnn over a period of tlme or on different parcels of land.
AttacA any additional infornatton that will EescrlDe your proposal or 1ts envlronnental effects. The agency to which you Submit this checklist may
•sk you to ezplein your answers or provide addtttonal infonnation reasonably related to dete rtatning 1f there may be siqnificant adverze Impact.
Use of chtckllst for nonproject proposals:
Cap lete thls checklist for nonproject proposals. even tl+ough Questions raay De answered 'da s not aDDlY*•
1N ADOlTION. ca.plete the SUP9LE?4ENTAl SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D).
For nonproject actions. the references in the cheCkllst to the worCs 'Dro,ject.' 'appllcant.' anG 'property or site' s►+ou1G be read as 'proposal,"
'pro9oser,' and 'affected geogrspAic erea.' resDectlvely.
A. BJICKGROUlID
1. 'Iawe of proposed project, if appltcaDle: q Q L11 l~rna rl w;~iv Arni r,rt-
-Z~jAJi-:R 2C'CL.455 f 4~ ( LOZi 10
2. New of Applicant: Tranco Industries I11C . Al
3. Addresz anA phone number or aDCllcant or concact person: p O Bo x 5 5; ~S p o k a n e, F W a 9 9 2 1 0 (509) 4 5 5- 3 5 2 0
4, o,ce checklist prepared: APr1I. 1 4, 1994
s. A9encr reauesc,ng cneckl,sc: Spokane County Planninq Department
6. Proposed tfoing or schedule (Sntluding phasing, if appllceble): s u m mer 1994
7. a. Do you have eny plens for future adCitions, expansfon, or further ectivlty releted to or co m ected rtth thts proposal? tf yes, expiain.
Y';~7-
Sp
D. Do you ovn or have opttons on lend neerDy or adjacent to thfs proposel? If yes, expletn.
no
8. llst any environmental infornatian you know ebout that has been prepared, or wtll be prepered. dlrectly related to this proposal.
none known
1'~>/-1 ~E G~ Ei,J A-N D `'DN S 10 i °)'7 9 ec- ~2c"~`'~ F/4,74 44'.
C.-
M
RtY.2/1/88 ~
~
Z E 22
t
4
t
9YO1CAITL LR7IROHldLN'LAL ORDIMANCE
(vAC 197-11-960) Sectioa 11.10.230(1)
A. MaCCQO'QAD (ton[laued)
9. Do you lmov vhecher applicatiocu are peodiag tor governaental •pprovala of othec ptoposala direecly sEfeccing the property covered by your
proposal? If 7es, enp laln.
onlv the process of submitting documents to the planning
department in preparation of receiving a building permit
10. l.tst •ny governoent approvala or pemlcs that vill be needed for your proposal. if la►ora.
_ Spokane County rngineer, Spokane County ni~ties, z>pokan
C;ounty AuiRling &--Sa=y, a~ukane ileutttl . F)iStli-cl , SPe)kanc
~,u _ ,State of- Wha9-k4:n9eT-Pe pt~ T-r-an--p o r t a t i a
Q_ d i L. _ n.-. 9.-. 1id.-. 1- d Waco r Tl i sf- r ~t
11. Glve • bciet, tamplete descriptlon of your propo w 1. lncluding the proposed uses and the si:e of the project •nd sl[e. "TTere ere several
Questloas Lcer tn thi• cheelcllst that aak you to deseribe certaln aspeets o( yout proposal. Y w do not need to repeac those ansvera on [his
pagc.
Rezoning of 5 acres presently zonect R-s in iyib . we are
„
rezoning approximately 4 acres rs-s ana i acre -L-2 Lu iiL ~i1C
contenple--ea use of-L.'he ImTrd. -MTe--l-2 " s-9na~~~d w±H busttie io e fn a i-n -i ;4 cj-4 q- w i 11 h~
z-et ; , lated-P73 u-s-e s ~
fi~UCt7NAL ~C-6i~t/cSSC$'3i
1:. Locatlon of the propoeal. Clve suf[leient tnforaacion Eor a person eo undecstand the pcecise loca[!on o[ your propoecd pro)ect, tncludtnp, a ~1~L~1Nw~l
street nddrees, if any, and •ec[lon, tovnship •nd range, !t knovn.
boundarie• o( the alte(a). I[ a propo u 1 would occur over a range•ot erea, provtde the range or
ProvlAe a legal descrip[ion, slta plan. Yiclnity sap, •nd topographic oap, it reasonnbly svat L ble. 1Jhile you ~
eAould suholt any plans requlred by the agency, y w are noC reQulred to dupltcace oaps or decailed p L os suboltteA vith eny permic appllcatlon
relaced to chle checklisc.
1 9 4 01 East 13roaciway as per fhe afLaciiet3m"ap. lltTu pr-o 0
zrvfft u y 1nd ; s , ,,,.atp-a- st-a-rt.inT
1866 t__t ..t ef BaY er_R-~e-ad--_=anninTS5a.ti fPPt to thP east
and a-gmrises annrnxi mat-P1 v 5 acrPs
cx_-viV 'i ~ .4S5i;~-5SO Q- t
Z5~, D
l]. Du a the proposed u tlon lie vtthln the AQuiter Senaltlve Aru (ASA)' The Ceneral Sever Setvice A[ea'. -he Prlority Sever Servtce Area' 'he
Clty ot Spokane? (See: Spolcane Coun[y's ASA OverL y Zone Ac Ls for boundacies).
ASA - yes priority Sewer Area- yes City of Spo)cane -No
"0 bC COKYLE'.'LO 84 APPLICAHT
D. @P7TRON`tYl1".AL E.EKEMS \
Evalwtion For
Agency Use Only
1. EAP.-TI
i
a. General deecripcion of the •ite (circle oae): fle[, rolling, hilly, st « p slopee, oouncainous,
other:
flat cTrasslands
b. 'lhac Ls the sceepesc alope on ctu site (approxlmate pereenc •lope)?
0% slope - Pxtremely flat.
c. 'thac general type• of solls are found on the slte (for euaple, clay, u od, gravel, peat, vutk)'.
If you knov the cliseificetlon ot •grlculcural solla, spatlfy then and aote any prloe Earuland.
} r,-~~..~...~l crOOC~ f ox' f. nct .
d. kre chere aurface tadicatlons or hlstory of unstable •olls !n the ianediate vicinity' If so,
deecrlbe.
no-unstability of the soil
z
+
Z E 2 2 ~
9 4,,,t.,
ti .
SPOKAME ENYIRONKEHTAL ORDINJUlCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Sectioo 11.10.230(1)
1
B. ENYIROMIENTAL ELEMENTS(continued)
Evaluatton For ^
~
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approzimate quentities of any fi111ng or graGing proposed. Agency Use Only
indicate source of f111.
tnn_-,nil f n r lAnrlcr-alai ng anrl har-kfillinci and SZi,CJl:Lt hP-C~ct o f SOla fOr sW,-dP_ c'3T'P_3S
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? lf so, qenerally des[rtbe. •
there are no runoff channels and the land is flat
but I understand that there is alcaays potential ;
tor a runott given an excessive water source. ~
;
--WP do not anticipate anv runoff ~
,
q. About wAat percent of the stte wtll be covered with impervlous zurfaces after project construc- ~ .
tton (for exemQle, asphalt or Cuildings)? 1-44
less than 10 percent of the site will be G~~'~'-~
coveren wifH-`nuil-aingts) ana aspna s ac:Mq .~/k~'
J& -r ;
h. ProposeC measures to reduce or control eroston. or other impacts to the earth. if any:
Fxtensive lanscapinq and fencinq will be placed on
the property perimeters and slightly raised
contouring W111 he usea it possible to give tne l~
iana a coriLain►«erli.
2. A1R
a. what type of enissions to the atr would result from the proposal (t.e., dust, autamobile, oGors
industrial, wood smoke) during tonstruction and when the project 1s caapleted? [f any, 'J x•C
07
generally destribe and give approximate Quentltes if knwn. ~J~~
dust from construction, automobile emmisions,~/
toon smells trom chocolate and roasting nuts 1~~- which are generally pleasant to others
G. Are there any off-site sources of ecuissions or odor that may affett your propo u 1? If so,
qenerally describe. 0
can' t think of any
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emisslons or other impac[S to a1r, 1f any:
we will stir up a mimimum of dust and dirt 7 !
during eonstruction like all other building v S P ~
proj ects and ceill use water to keep dust down. '
we nave nign air currents in Lnis locaLion wnich
rttUt-1 ~ .
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) ls there any surface water bedy on or in the imsedlate vtcinity of Lhe slte Sncluding year-
round and seasonal streams, seltvater, lakes, ponds, wetlandsl? lf yes, destribe type and
proviCe names. !f appropriate, state what stream or river tt flowi into.
the nearest stream is one mile north - the Spokane !
River. Liberty Lake is 2 miles Past. There aze , •
no wetlancis evicient anct no water noaies. ~IIFIIJ11.5_Z'
(2) will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (wlthln 200 feet) che destrtbed
waters? If yes, pleese descrlbe and attach available planz.
I1Q
i.
3 •
Z E •
22 n 94
~ .
\
• t ~
spor.~ ~vtxonearr= osntneAxcE
(aAC 197-I1-960) Seeclon 11.10.230(1) •
D. LNVI1lON!(ENTA1. ¢LOMN'.'S (continued)
Eveluatlon For
Ageney Use Only
(7) Eatimte the •oount of fill and dredge material [hat vould be placed in oc removed from the
w cfate va[er or ve[landa •nd lndlcace the •rea of the si[c [ha[ vould De affeeted. Iadt uCe
the •ource of E111 macerial. '
'rv Qi.-►'lc=We-1-1--a's~-+-°v-i'~
(G) Will the propooal cequire surfaee uater vitfidcavala or dlverslons' Clve • general desezlp- [lon, purpose, end approxlaate quantltles, if kn am.
not applicable - we have no water or
wetlands
. ;
(5) Doe• the proposal 1Se vtthin a 100-year tlood plain? If so, note lou cion on the oite plan.
?ah C ~
no
(5) Does the proposal tnvolve •ny discAarge• of vu te oacerlals to sucfate vater$' It 00,
describe the type of vaate •nd anticipated volu m ot discharge. i
nQne '
;
b. Ground:
(1) V111 groundvater be vithdravn, or vill vater be discharged to groundva[er' Clve gerteral '
descrlptlon, purpoae, artd •pproxinate Quanti[Les, !f Imorn.
~
no we are on a water system from
the Consolidated Water nistrict
f
t
Deserlbr vastr oaterlal chat vlll bs discharged loto the gcound from septic tanka or ocAer •
aao![ary vaate cru w nt facllLty. Describe the general •Lze ot the syscem, the oumDer ot
houeee to be served (i[ •pplleaDle) or Ehe nuaber ot pe coocu the •yateo(a) •rc e=peeted co
serve.
no water will be dischargecl except for
watering landscaping.
i
,
,
(7) Descrlbe •ny •ysceea, ocAer [han those dealgned for the Aispo u 1 0[ u nicary vaace.
inscalled for the pur➢ose of discharging [luids belov the groued surf►ce (includes srsteos suth 1i1~
ss choae for the diaposal o[ scors wter or d[ainage trau floor dralns). Descrlbe the type of Wr1/'.
" systeo, the aoount of wcerial [o be dlsposed ot through the sysces and the cype• of "teriala ~~~~1 •
Y1/'r
llkely to be dlaposed ot (including aatetial• vhlch aay en[Or the syttm inadverten[1y thrw gh
•pills or •s • result of tireflghtlag aecivitles).
ia f1t a.p 13 1.1 r cZh I F' - Q i 1 I 1P
(4) W111 aay cheaical• (eapecially organic aolveo[• or petrolew fuela) Se atored in above- ~ 6w,
grouad or uadergrouod •to nge u nka' If so, vhat t7Pes and quiae[![Les of sa[erlal• vlll De
acorcd?
no
4~
~
Z E 22 4
94,
Air. '
Sror.Arn urvixoN?d~fu. owir•ARce
(YAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1) ~
E. LRVIR027lSCRfAL LI.E4FT5 (contlnucd)
Evsluatlon Por
Agencr Use Only
(S) Vhat pro[ettlve measuree vill be taken to insure that laaks or spllls ot •ny ehenieala
scored or used on el[e vlll noc 6e alloved to peccolate to gtoundvater ([hie lacludes neaturee
to keep cheaicals out ot dispoasl •ystea• descrlEed in 3b(2) anA 3b(3)'
~ASA
nn rherni ral c 3-r-P c+- cj}p
~~a.c~ ~~i~.~.~►~ . ~ R ~ -1
A ~.-4
c. Vacer Runoff (lncluding stoto v&cer):
(1) Destrlbe the •ource of runo[f (including stots vater) aud me[:wd ot collection and dlspo w 1
lf any (laclude quantlties, !t knovn). Hhere vill [hi• water [lov? V111 tRi• r cer flov inco
oCAer wacers' Il so, describe. ,
storm water will be divertEd to swales on '
the site and absorbed in the landscaping
as irrigation watering •
(2) aill any cheolcal• be scored, haodled or usad on the site in • lou tion vhere • spill or
1es1: vtll drain to surface or groundvater ot co astorm water diepo u 1•yst m dischargtng co
suttace or groundvater' •
n o 441 44
~ •~j~/~V~r
~J
(J) Could vaste oaterials eater ground or •urface wacers1 If •o, generally desctlDe.
n o
d. Proposed measure• co reduee or control •urface. Sround, and cuno[( water topaecs, t( •ny (if
t the proposed •ction lle• vichln the IWulter Seniitiva Area De •speelally clear an •zylaaations hlCl/ J,~
r relating to tacill[1a• concecnloa Stccions 3E(4). 3b(5). aod 3c(2) of thls checkllst):
n o t a p p l i c a b l e w e h a v e n o n e
•~~K~~ ,ifi~-~- C~7r~
+
c. ruvrs
a. Check or clrcle type of vegecacion tound on che a1Ce:
i
detiduous [ree: alder, oaple, •open, o[her.
i
evergreen trae: tir, cedar, pine, ocher. ~
shcubs.
grase.
X puture.
crop or graln.
vet wil pLantt, utuil, botteccup, bullrwh, •kunlc cabbage, other.
water plan[s: water lllly, eelgrass, a11toL1, oche[.
ocher cype• o[ veaeucloo.
' D. What kirtd and aaount ot vegacation vlll De reoved or al[ered? a,,. l 1 L-,e pllt ln
-~r n t~ rr~~ze~rr/E7't'frrttt7s v~ r~ir ~ ~c~ve l e c~ r~cx crr ~ ~cr
) ~.~y n.r- c~ --rc6
~sc ~r
c. List cAreatened or endaagered specie• imovn to be on or neer che •1ce. .
none known
,
d. Proposed landsuping, we ot nacive plants, or ocher seuuces to preserve or enhance vege u tloo
v ~v
on che •i[e, lf any:
e P~xtensivetrPPc; ancl shruhs , a s ca _1 1 as
f lowers . We lovP plants. ~ Sp
~
5
Z E • 22 ~ ~ 4;
i '
. ~ 1-7 Z~~ ~
• SPOKANE ENYIKOttMEt(TAL OROINANCE
(11AC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) • B. ENYIROMiENTAL EIETlEKTS (continued)
EvaluaNon For
Agency Use Only
5. ANIMALS -
a. Circle any birds and animnls which have Deen observed on or neer the slte or are kn a+n to De on
or near the stte: +
I
blyds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: 1']f~ V4,44
coamrnals: deer. bear, elk, beaver, other: 1'1(") ;
fish: bass. salmon, trout, herring. sbellflsh, other: n O ~
other: '
I
b. list any threatened or endangered zpecies knw n to be on or near the s1te. ~
;
~
s
~
~
C. 15 the site part of a migration route? If so. explaln. ~ ~
d. Proposed neasures to preserve or enhante wildltfe, 1f any:
not applicable
5. ENERGY ANO HATURAL aESOURCES
a. what kinds of energy (elettric, natural gas. wood stove. Solar) rill be used to meet the
the completeE project's energy neeCs? Oestribe rhether 1t w111 be useG for heeting. nb nutac-
turing, etc.
electricitv and natural qas
A. Nould your project effect the potentlal use of solar energy by adjacent properttes? ff so,
generally describe.
Tl (1
~
C. 11het ktnds of energy conservetton features ere included 1n the plans of this proposal? list J
other proDOSed r.easures [o reduce or control energy impaCts, 1f any: the building is aggregate and we do not"~'4,,,1_
require much heating in cold months since
it benetits our pronucts to sray cooi.
7. ENYIIiONHENTAI HEALTH
a. Are there any env/rorxnen[el health hazards, tncludinq exposure to toztc cne"lcals, risk ot flre
and explosion, spill, or nezardous waste, that cou1C ocCUr as e result of this proposal? If so.
Eescribe.
.
n o
a
(1) Describe speclnl energency servtces that might be required.
I10 TM4~ f '
t
6 "
or, .
r •
Z.<
s.
9TOICAHE Qt7I[OtaSLRiLL ORDINANCL
(YAC 197-11-960) Setclon 11.10.270(1) '
E. C!i9IROHKLlTfAL LSMCENS5 (concinued)
Evaluacion For
Agency Uee Only
e1NIRONME11:AL HEAL:'R (contlnued)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envirocmencal health hasards, lf any: i~
I cannot identifv anv environment,-Ll
potential health hazards
D. Nolse:
(1) What cype• of noise esisc lo the area vhich may affect rour project (for esanple: trnffic,
equipaent, operaclon, other? /
The c-cans ructi nn 1)ha7.P wi 1 1 ahva 1 i mi tpr3
noise from equipment, but the actual
operating period will have little noise
<since~ e have A].most no oer~ti~nc~ mac~hinery
(Z) ype• and eve ~ o[ nolse vo created by or • oci~te v he pro ect on •
shorc-cera or a long-cerm basis (for eunple: cra[fic, corutrueclon, operacion, o[her)? Indicate
vhac hour• no1se vould come fro■ the site.
r n n-, t r» r- t- i n n w i 11 h A d r].ricid aTl t~' r~-•- !'y%~~'~"r
hours 6 c~a~s c'1 WPPk_ C/<~~1~ ~vn
- 3 ~u
(1) Proposed measure to reduce or conttol nolse ispacts, lf any:
T' &"s`, f ~
ijlcl sc.ream> and nobody wot~ 1 d hPar mP.
~drP-a--dj acent to freeway and they WE,~L
8. lr1'fD AND SNORELIt!~: Ryer most noise
A. Vhat 1s the current use o[ the sLte and adjacent proper[les' ~
open qrassland surroundinq site with
e. line the .t<<~~'~~~~ eg4~~'r~aTf .Pqa.X~r tenant basis
no in many decades
c. DescrlDe eny strueture• on the slte.
none
d. V111 •ny scructure• be deaollshed? I[ so, vh1cA?
none
e. Vhat !o the current soning classiflca[lon of the •ice?
,13 - 3 zw <119
Vhat 1• the current comprehecuive p Lo designation ot the
urban
g. I[ eppllcaDle, vhac 1• the current shoreline oaster progru designa[lon of the •ite'
nnt anpl i rahl P
h. Itas aar pact of the si[e been classltled •s aa 'eov-ironmentally •eosltive' area? If no,
d
•peclty. 11 n
. ~ .
1. Approzlmately hw oany people vou1C reside or vork lo the compleced projeccl
r ~
apprex4:fnately 10 12 pee z E
here and about 30'-35 outside visits per d a y 7
~
~
SPOICANE IIQVLYDlMN'~L~1. ORDIli~NG~
U
(WAC 19I-11-960) Seetlon 11.10.230(1) . ' B. CNVIROtilMAl. LI.EKLNTS (eontinusd) v_vsluetlon For
Agency Use Only
J. Appro:loacely hov many people would the conpleced projec[ dlap Lee'
. '
k. Proposed oeasure• to avoid or redute disp L ceseat lopaets. 1[ an7:
none
1. Proposed saasuce• to ensure the proposal 1• carmpatlble vlth esis[les aod Projected land uaas •od .r
plaos, if any: 44;V
none that I am aware of ltv-, 9--3
9. NOUSINC
Approxiaately hw aanr unic• would De provided. 1[ anyT Indlcat• vfiachar higM ,■iddle-, or
lov-incone hausing.
nAD-}- pn 1 i r~
D. Approxloately hov eaoy units, if aey, would De eliaina[ed! Iadlu te vlrcher hlgh-, oiddle-, or
lov-lncooe housing. yF~%~
~ f
c. ProposeA emsures to redute or control housing lmpacCs, lf •ny:
not applicable .
10. AESTIIETICS
Nhac 1s the u llest helght ot any proposed struc[ureW, not tncluding anteima@d vhac in che
princlpal e:terior bullding oatarlal(*) proposedT.
the highest potentially
0 (A. .t/~
~
colated structure would be 25 foot
ori a buiining ana no more than 6U toot on
~~.1. ayc ~jo -5a
b. tIhat vlev• in che loedlate vLelnlty would De alteTed oT obatcuc[ed1 s~
no structure exists within 800 feet and
I can`t se them from my property so they
bltuuicl nor- Ae onsLructinc tneir view. There
C. Ptoposed .e..ures to redu« o< <ontrol ...th.«c i.,.«., f•a,: i s a z ence +
~
between the nearPst- nei ghhors tn thP n►~t}Lan
me anc1 a freeway to the north senarates our
CWly close neighbors. we will landscape
11. LICHT AND ~
~q~^J~ry~
a. 'llut type of light or glare vlll the propowl prod~+ee! '•fi+c [lae of dq would lt salnly occur'.
f
i f ~LP 1 i gh t- th Q^ a r?: J ea t hc Alr A
those liqhts will be visible r Rut othPrwi se
b. coula iiQt~~yYi..~~~o~n~-Ri.n~~g~4~1~3 .I^I~~Ghra lAo,%ULAf1n a4~1 be
seen, rae see no safety hazar6 notential
c. 4thac axisclog off-slte •w rces of light or g L re wa7 affect your proposal' ~
d. Proposed oeAsure• co reduce or coecrol lighc and glare inpacts, if any: ~
i f i t a, f f P c- fi~ i -q w,- wzi3_1 Ctir~.e n~•,; r h t r P0 s
and plantinns hut this doesn, t-annPa_r
necessary
t~
8 .
Z E • 22 ~ 94
. SPOTARE LRVIRONlhMAL oRDno1tJCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Seetioo 11.10.230(1) •
, . 1
D. RPVIRORMltAL II.EMMtlS (eontioued) Eveluatlon For
Ageney Uee Only
12. RECRLA210ti 1
uhat designated •nd iatorsal reerea[loaal opportunltle• are in the laaediate vicinicy'
hikinq in tbP r2asturP
f~(_z
. )
b. Would the proposed project disp Lce any e:iscing recreatlooal usee? If eo, descrlbe.
hiking in the pasture - no other use nossible
for recreation
c. Proposed oeasures to reduce or concrol Lpse[t on reereatioo, including recreatiocvl oppoctua!-
tle• co be provided by the project or •pplieant. if any:
pasture will clisappear as we build project .
13. NIS"ORIC AND CULTURAL FRES2RVA:'lON
A. Are chere anr plates or objeces listed on or proposed [or aatlonal, •cace or local preserva-
clon reQister• knovn to be o0 0r nost to the sltet Ii so, ganerally describe.
__11 n
b. Generally daacrlbe a07 landnarks or evldence ot hiscoric archaeological, mcieoclfic or culcural
tsporcanca Imam to be on or nent to the sLte.
none known
c. Proposed oaasure• to reduce or control lopacts. lf •ny:
if anv are needed, we will do them, we ,
know of nothing at this time
14. TT.AqSPORTATION
a. Idenclfy publlc streets and highveys •erv1nY the •lce •nd dencriDe proposed •ccess to the
exlsting screet •rsteo. Shoron •SCe p L na, 1f any.
we are located along Rroadway and Interstate 90 ,
and Hodges Road is proposed an(i will .be built.
7Rarxer Roaci is FST]"Q-reer wes~c on nroaclway affift"
, . 4 -;~tn
i a 1 ~ ~ i~,~~ •
iJ µ'n arter i a
b. 1• •SCe curceocly •ecved Dy publle cranslt'. If aot, vlut 1• the •pprozlnate dlscanee to the
oearest transic •topt _M 3,889 ~'eet _ t T------~~ - 1' • t~ .~er
~ ~
c. Rov oan7 parking •paces vould the compleced proSeet havet Bov uny vould Ctu proyecE elisicutc!
24 parking spaces unless we are told we need
more and there is lots ot space to ada more
y
d. W111 the propoaal raQuire any ww rwds or streets, or lmprovemnu co e:iscing road• or scrwn
not Includin¢ drlvevaysT if so, geoerally deserlbe (lodlu ce vh tAer public or private). `
H n RxSiaL_WD v ta--a c, n u n t v road ~
that will k~e brought up to stanc~ards
~
e. wtll the pro}ac[ ase (or occur ln the lamedlate vicinl h ot) usEer, rail, or alr tra dportatioa?
If w, generally descrlbe.
S °
no water, rail, ox air transporatation used ~~/ST~~r ~'"P~~`~' ~
9
• •
Z 22 94
,v .
SPOIUNE LRVIQOlRQ4TAL ORDIl1&2tCL
(VAG 14i-11-960) Seccloa 11.10.230(1)
D. LNOIROtBKET*.I►1, E,1,EMZW'g (coatlnwd) ~
Evaluacion For
Agencl Use Ooly
f• Hov nany vehicul4r [rips per day vould be generatcd Dy the eoopleted projeet? Ii knovn,
tod1c.« w'enestimated about 40-45 vehicle trips per -9 `
day with employees being aioout 10 anci
visizors .neing arounn per aay.
~ ~ cire ' -6pm
g. ProposeG vcssurea to reduce or control tranaport&tinn impaeu, lf •ny:
if necessary we could stagger working hours for
our few employees and encourage carpool'ing
is. ruetic seavices a. 57ould ctu prnject result ln an incrn&sed need [or public •ervices (for esauple, fire proteccioo,
police procection, health care, schools, athec)2 I[ so, generally deu r1be.
hydrants placed on both south corners of pmo erty
and a f ire station around 800 feet south shopld satisfy fire protection. nuilaing will be /4*4,
a
ggrega-ce affC'Tia'`L uuinbustt . F, ' c Ayt
fefieifig--should
b. Proposed neasure• to reduce or control direct lapact• on public •ervlces, 1! any:
reduce neecl for-unusual police protection.
We do not anticipate aNY large need for public
services
ib. v-itt-tes
a. Clrcle urllicles cu n ently •val L bl• •t the mSCe: eleetrlclty, naturai gas, vater, cet w•
servite, celephooe, •anitary sever, •eptit systes, ochar. ,
electricity, water, natural gas, sewer,
refuse icku tele hone and sanitar
p P~ P ► Y ~
sewer all available at siLe. ~
b. Oescribe tf+e u H 11t1e• thac •re proposed for chs pro)ect, chr ut111ty provldln6 the service •nd
che gene nl coeucevctlon •ccivitie• on the slte or 1n che looediate vicinity vhieh n1Qht be ~V
needed.
Spokane County - sewer Rell Telephone - telephone
Consoli.dated Water- water
wwP - nafi_»rat aas
C. SICNATURP
t, crtc undersigned, evear unde< <he perulcy o[ perjury thac the above respoose• are made tcvchtully •nd co the beat of vr koovledge. I• L o
underecand chec, •hould there be •ay villful nisrepresencatlon or villful Lck of lull dt•clo•ure an Qy Darc, che aReecr_ .ay vichar•v .ny
determinatlon of rtonaigni[iu nce ctLC ic alghc issue In reliacice upon chi• eAecklist. -
o.«: April 14, 1994 prapoaent Tra13r-n Tn~n-,tri c--qti T-ar. h vGPne Cohen, Presido-l
(P1eu e Prin[ or Sype) `
Proponent: Addzess: P O R o x 5 5; S p o k a n e, W a 9 9 2 1 0
(SlgttiEure)
Prone: ( 509) 455-3520 j
Person coapletinE foru: (iP11P_ L'OhP_21 pate;
Phone: _ 4 5 5- 3 5-2
POR STATP ase oxLT ; r c
SCa[f umDer(•) revlevi ~
rtg c he c tc I 1st:
8 u ed on this staff revlev of the environoenul ehecklist and other pertlneac inforuation, the iC~ff:
A. _-..ioncludne ctut there •re no probable slgnlfiunt •dverse fapacto and cecomseods • detetiloa[lon oi nooiignifleaace.
e
d• Concludes cluc probable •lgalflcant •dverse eovironaental inpacc• do e:lsc tor r-he currenc D[oppmal aod recossends a sitigaced deter-
sim cion of nonnlgnificance %rith eoodi[lonr.
C. Concludes that [ture are proDaDle eignlfiuat adve u e enviromencal ispacts aod reccccneod• a deterolnation of aigniflesaee.
TILIRC PEE - 05.00
10
ZEW 22=94
• ' .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFnRMATInNti NAME OFA.PPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Tranco• Industries Inc
MAILING ADDRESS: p n Rny,_S 5; CITY: S Z kan p-; STATE: W a ZIp: 99210
PHONE: ( 509 455-352(Wrk) ( 509 ) 455-3520 (home) (509) 535-001 0
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOS AL S ITE ARE A(acres or sq. ft) 234.264 s q f t 5ac r e s)
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ,J
-9-3 25
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL / 7,5- • Oy~C~
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED 5 5 1-7-5, 0 410 . c:oroin .
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSA.L 19401 Fast Rroadway; Creenacres, Wa 99016
EXISTING ZONE CLAS SIFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) ~6 -7cLaA Ast a b 1 i s h e d
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY open f ields
PROPOSED ZONING I; 2 and R~ 3 on remainder of parcel
'I,c~&,- ~ 3,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School nistrict
FIRE DISTRJCT Fire District One (1)
WATERPURVEYOR Consolidated Water District
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: I-2 Food Products Manufacturing
R-3 all permitted uses under the R-3 Zoning
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactlued homes Business Industrial (y) Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
1976 zoning decision 13q_ 76 r
. ~
~ L
B. LEC AL./Z ~ ONE RE ,I,ASSIFICA,.TI()L~I NFnR~]V~,TTn •
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lot #£i , Yl Rlock 3, Corbin
Addition to Greenacres, Spakane County
SECTION , TOWNSHIP RANGE W ~
'•I v
NAIviE OF PUELIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Rarker, I-90; Appleway, Rroadway
& Hodges ( proposed ) ,,C0 S~()W.Pd-
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 6 5 9. 6 f eet f ront s I- 9 0
and same 659.6 feet fronts Broadway
Z .
, Es 2
2=94
~
~ . . , _
, ZONE RECLASSIFICATIVN APPLICATI4N Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Appleway & Rarker access via
Broadway 400' to Appl eway
and 1800 feet to Rarker Rd
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
/
EXISTING ZONE(S) a 11 i s now R- 3 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ I- 2~1- j
F012 THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW.
` _ ~
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
I oian i t
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED?
The areais located in a trianqle surounded by 3 major streets-
Appleway, Rarker Road, and Interstate 90. Only 5 homes still
76-acres---e€tit-'r9 , gid aiG sma-'_' .
None are remotely close to this property. All the surrounding
area is moving to business and commercial class oecause oz the
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON T'HE ADJACENT
-PROPERT'IES? sPwPr avai 1 ahi 1 i tv ed,5v of water, excellent road
access, lack of any environmental concerns since this is homestead
lana, leve . lie-d-st 15 * bus zcrcated
in th;q tr,ana1P and Pa-ab vPar more are rezoned and build. Our
business relies on the freeway for its success due to our attracting
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION?
tourists and people who commute. Shopping centers are building
at Suflivan anc[---Rarvarci intercnanges ann- a rec-teat±onat e
4c bui 1 di n cr -i iiqt w A ct of t 1'1 i-q ~ nf~,- t 1 Q 21 _ T he a r e a
is moving to business uses and-away from any housing. All our
surroundin_g land is pasture and we are the first business to build
WHAT MEASURES .DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
' SUR.ROUNDTNG LAND USE? 24L4&& h a v e a R_1 7 n n i n q,
Others have built beyond us at least 700 feet away including a
new fire hall, truc.king insulation business, anct tne recreational
V"ci rie-l-c 9ales %4Q-1-6hi-4 S a~artin n n n c t- r i i r-t i n n_ uP h a v P
been told by our adjacent ladoEaners that they are in agreement with
our proposed land use and I hnow ot no opposition at Lnis time
fr..m .,n., re.,rby landhnldor _ ax-o c„rroiznrlPrl hv R-3 and T_ndustrial
zoning uses.
• -
S~
. ~
, •
~
22
~ ~ .
;ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII,L PRQVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS 'HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON WITH THE
AGENCIES TDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN TI-E PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
Q1,11IRE MARSHALL7~FIRE DISTRICT ~
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. I~
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
. IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND rABLE IlZE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR TO CALCULATE NO
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINED
. APPLICATION TIME.
D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
F ISTRI T SIGNATURE/TITLE DA"E
J~u . ~ ~.~`o~ ~,(~.5► l S ~
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HA:VE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
Dw ~ r e hv
WATER DISTRICT SIGN`AT"UREfrAI.,E DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: 7 d
)cci~%/~ =
r~
~
SIGNA /I'ITLE DATE
COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVEly9 T) ,)3EEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS C~/c~Jti..~vd
A . COMMENTS : , i
/
4//
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
. HEALTH DISTRICT ~
, A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL W7k-xv'E5• (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNAT(AE/I'ITLE DA'fE ~
. SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE ,
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERST00 BY THE APPLICANT. •
A. COMMENTS: 41~ ~ A
' l/
'
.
' .~~~•'~C~/ ~-i.~
SIGNATUREf'rITLE DATE
. .
•
Z E
22
. 4` ZONE RECLASSIFICA N APPLICATI4N Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII,L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH '
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS 'HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENT'IFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN TI-E PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
~IRE MARSHALL IRE DYSTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. I~
B. ADEQUATE A►RRANGEMENTS (HAVE) HAVE N BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND F "~'~C F(~R FTRF
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED F.IRE FLOW: OR i~ABLE TO CALCULATE NO
BECAUSE USE TS NOT DEFINITTVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED
. APPLICATION TTME.
D . REQUIREMEIVTS INCLUDE:
,
F ISTRT T SIC~AT'URE~I'ITLE DA a~~1.~ . ~ , t l S ~
n
'VVATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUTREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: 4144461e
lJ;~o
l- ;a .4v 2-ILe, D.Jl 40-64~ /9V
WATER DISTRICT SIGNAT'URE5AtE DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DTSCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQU7REMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
r
A. COMMENTS: /'~1 II1 i~
.9
) L r 11 ' r ~'1 ' .
~
SIGNA /TITLE DATE
COUNTY UTILTTIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVETYQ T) ,~EEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE JS CC~k.~~d A. COMMENTS: , i
.
STGNATURE/TITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
• SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROFOSAL jH*VlR-} (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS : G ,~t~.~~~ ~~-G '
. . _
STGNA'JjC*E/TITLE . DAfE ~
,
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOO BY THE APPLICANT. A.. COMMENTS:
~~L I ~
STGNATURErT'ITLE DATE
, . _
Z E • 22-m
" • _ ~ .
' . 1
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART III
R SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
'
~ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
t co z ~ •
~ *
%
ycaol DATE:
- L ~sYER3' PHONE: -
~ LAN
t ~ !~tR~'S 4/23/ ZIP:
F ~ ~ .
~
~I'~7' :.''77''^~ti`'r77Te'T►tr+f'rirmn~ IlJ} l~.l''r
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTfiR OF AUTHORI.zATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR ARRITM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSfiD
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY TDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTTON, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
~
~ - .
~ LSIGNED: Au-lx DATE: ~
ADDRESS: HONE: 3,S ZU
zrP: 16)
?
SIGNXOF APPLICANT OR REP S ATIVE ~ DA'It
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
L~•
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS Ay ~ DAY OF
,
(-"-1994, BY
' ~iNp
S,oN s _
oxs
~ ,
- N PUBLIC ~ Nc~t~ry Fu ' in d for~he State of Wa hington
9~ ~pA. Ot . ~9~0 Rcsiding al: s--
0P wAMy appointment e . xpires:
~
V
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED: 5'ltCvI`) `4 FILE
DATE ACCEP'TED: BY; -
TOTAL FEES: 7/ 7 RECEIPT 17 l 9~
►
. .
,
• ~ • r 22=94
:
~
r ,
May 4, 1994, at 1:15 p.m.
Gene Cohen
Generally located north of Broadway Avenue, south of Interstate 90,
approximately 2,000 feet east of Barker Road in Secaon 17, Township 25
N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industnal, and within Pnonty Sewer Service
Area (PSSA)
EXISTING/AROPOSED ZONING: Regional Business (B-3) to Regional
Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Regional
Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) and Light Ind::strial (I-2) for .
food prodLict manufacturing, retail sales and those uses allowed in the
proposed Regional Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2) zones.
PARCEL NUMBER: 55175.0410
SITE SIZE: Approximately 5 acres
APPLICANT: Tranco Industries, Inc.
Gene Cohen
PO Box SS
Spokane, WA 99210
(509) 455-3520
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Steve Davenport
wlc-Tranco-April 18, 1994
~
. ~
. •
PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT
Date: ~ Number:
Name Phone
Addresa
Comments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING
- . . : . /EN6INEER'S . . .~PLANNING Depaitinent_..Department;
,
Addressing i Admin. Exccption i Approach Pcrmit
~ Building Permit i Arterial Rd Plan Info =Flood Plain Permit
! Code Tnformation Binding Sitc Plan Info i Public/I'rivatc Roads
Commercial Review Cert. of Exemption i Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
~ Conference Comprehensive Pian _ Sitc Drainage Info .
~ Energy Code Info , Cond. Use Permit i Subdivision Review
~Fire Safety Review ~ Nonconforming Use ~ Utility Permit
~ Manufactured Home Perrnit Revicw ~ Zone Changc ReviewC>10(-)
~ Mechanical Permits ~ Shorelines Info
! Olher Permits Short Plat Info NO FEE REQUIRED
~ i -2eviewer T'une out
~ Plumbing Pcrmits ~ Subdivision Info
- ~ ~
~ Private Road Info ! Temp. Use Permit A)TILITIESDepa~trri''e'nt.;;;;:~.'
Residential Review Variance Appl. _ APA Payment
~ Sewcr perm;ts Zone Check Ccrt. of Exemption
Zonc Info Sutxlivision Review
~ ULID/Sewer Info
Zone Change Review
~ NO • rF_ RF_QUIIZED NO FT-- E REQUIRLD
Reviewer Time out Reviewer Time out I2cvicwer Time out
I •
MiLS7ERWASSE'OR1.CfR 1118M
~ .a,J
Y
S l} O A N .E U N ' 1' Y
1'LANNING DEPAR'I'MENT 4VALLIS D. I 1U1313AIt[), Dlltt:CTc7R
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
Q PR 2 z 1994
TO: sop 0111u114c _ti n.~ . aP Ja y ` J SPOBrenda Sims, S torm Water Utility ~~fEE$
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Departmeilt
Greg Figg Deparrment of Transportation
Ctu-istine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Council
Central Valley School District No. 356
Ccnsolidated Irrigation District No. 19
Fire Protection District No. 1
FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner ?
DATE: Apri1 18, 1994
RE: Tranco Industries Zone Reclassification from Regional Business (13-3) to
Regional Business (13-3) and Ligtit Industrial (I-2)
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE 1AND DESIGN REVIEW MLr'I'INC .
MAY 4, 1994 AT • 1 m
Cn[NTY PLANNING_CONFERE~LU Rn()M, 2ND rLn()IZ
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCCPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MfiETING FORM for your commeilts. The Planning Department
encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comnients on the
attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE A.ND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the mceting and
iJicluded in the Planning Department file (so bring jhrP& copies to the meeting). Thanks
fo~r your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please concact
Steve Davenport of the Planning Depa.rtment at 456-2205.
c: Tranco Industries, Ine., Gene Cohen, PO Box 55, Spokane, WA 99210
Attachments: APplication Accept.ance arid Design Rcvicw Form, Projccl Dcsign, Site Plan
wtc-Tranco-April 18, 1994
WEST1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SroKnNIF-, INnsFtiNC'rotv 992GU-02,IU • (509) ,156-a?05
. , • .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. CENERAL INFORMATInNi
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Tranco Industries Inc
MAILING ADDRESS: n n Rr,}c 5 5:
CITY: ypokanSTATE: Wa ZIp: 9 9 21 0
PHONE: (509). 455-352Nork) ( 509 ) 455-3520 (home) ( 509) 535-001 0
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHOR7ZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRES S :
CITY: STAT'E: ZIP:
, PROJECT/PROPOS AL S ITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 234,264 s q f t 5 a c r e s)
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.)
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECTJPROPOSAL 9 3- 2 5 7 2
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED 5 5-1 7 5. 0 410
c:orDin CJ
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 19401 F,ast Rroadway; Greenacres, Wa 99016
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B,Z 1 A 7 h 7-n n P Pst ab1 i s hed
EXISTTNG USE OF PROPERTY oZLep f i e 1 d s
PROPOSEDZONING 1-2 and R-3 on remainder of parcel
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School District
FIRE DISTR;CT Fire District One (1)
WATERPURVEYOR Consolidated Water nistrict
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: I-2 Food Praducts Manufacturing
R-3 all permitted uses under the R-3 Zoning
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Business Industrial (y) Mixed Use N
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANMNG DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
1976 zoning decision
B. I1F.CiAL/ZONE RECLASSXF1CATInN-jNlF4RMQ,TIQ?~j,-
LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL: NF 1/4 Section I,ot#81 Township Rlock 3, Corbin
Addition to Greenacres, Spokane County
SECT~ON TOWNSHIP RANGE
NAME OF PUBLIC RCJAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Rarker , I- 9 0; Appleway , Rroadway
& Hodges (proposed)
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 6 5 9. 6 f eet f ront s I- 9 0
ancl same 6 5 9. 6 f eet f ront s Broadway
. „ .
. , ' ZONE RFCLASSIFTCATION A.PPLICATION ' Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL 4R PLANNED ARTERIAL YES NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Appleway & Rarker access via
Rroadway 400' to Appleway
and 1800 feet to Rarker Rd
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
EXISTING ZONE(S) a 11 i s now R- 3 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ 1-2
FOR TKE FOLLOWIhiG DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGA.L DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW. .
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
I own it
,
WHAT A.RE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE TNIS
PROPOSAL WAR,RANTED? .
The areais located in a trianqle surounded by 3 major streets-
Appleway, Rarker Road, and Interstate 90. Only 5 homes still
~Xl S~ j-T2---t+T'c- -i n ,c t1., n1 L, ldi_ac~ _ m- =i~ . acres None are remotely close to this property. All the surrounding
area is moving to business and commercial class because oz the
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? sPwPr avai 1 abi 1 i ty, easv of water, excellent road
access, lack of any environmental concerns since this is homestead
lana, le . 1-ezrS"L- 1 JJCJ !-acated
i.n th..; tr; ;Rncil P anci Pach year more are rezoned and build. Our
business relies on the freeway for its success due to our attracting
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION?
tourists and people who commute. Shopping centers are building
at Sul-iivan ancf-Marvara inLercnanges an6 a rectea-t~l vetrtce
huil_.ri; nr~ jnst- wPsfi nf this lQcation. The area
is moving to business uses and away from any housing. All our
surrouncling land is pasture and we are the first business to build
WHAT MEASLJKES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? n,i-S I .v A a-a-1 t h 0 ugh wA h.a.up A--a--3 ?aning .
Others have built beyond us at least 700 feet away including a
new fire hall, trucking insulation business, anct tne recreaLional
l.. e y Wh3-6h--=-C startinn n n n a 4- r i i c4- i n n uP ha v F?
been told by our adjacent ladowners that they are in agreement caith
our proposed land use and I hnow ot no opposition at Lnis time
fr,,...~n-~.=~ny--nea,..b., landhQld Qr_ ~pJp ?rA c--,lrrpnnr3nr1 h-V 9-1. and Tndustrial
zoning uses.
.
~
: ZONE RE~:.'LASSIFTCA'TION APPLICATION ' Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTTON OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHAI.L BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALLlFIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MA.DE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED F.IRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITTVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUII.UING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIR.EMENTS/COMMENTS:
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURErT'ITLE DATE .
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: / d /yl /~L7 G~17
r 9
. ~
SIGNAT /TITLE DATE .
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS .
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE .
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. '
A. COMMENTS :
,
SIGNATUREjI'ITLE DATE ,
. ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON A.PPLICATION . Page 4 of 4
PART III
w
R SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
~P ~ ~
~,.~~~r ~i~A , A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED T'HE INFORMATION
;'F~" p • -
?ZONING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
y ~.c~'•.,'9~~ 10401IG•
DATE:
!STEP.•••' ~Cv
PHOI `l 7.G ~
~ L L AN L
~ F ;ni R F-: S ~/23/ ZIP:
~~'Z ~ . ~ ~i.uu1F~
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LE7TER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, TF-E UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR ARRITM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
SIGNED: DATE:
ADDRESS: PHOiNE: ZIP:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
, 1994, BY NOTARY SEAL Nocary Public in and for the Scate of Washing[on
Rcsiding at:
My appointment expires:
r PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED: FILE DATE ACCEPTED: B Y ;
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
r . ~
PARCEI. "A" - Lol 8, Block 3, "C4RBIN ADDITION to GIZEENACIZESas per pl.at thereof
reeorded iti Volunie "S" of Plcrts, Page 30, Spokane Cozinty, Wcrshington.
EXC.EPT the eas1180 feet thei•eof, AND EXCEI''l Broaclway Aveflue.
PARCEL "B" - The east 180 feet of Lot 8, Block 3, "COIZBIN ADDITION to GIZEENACRES",
as per plat recorded ij? Volume "S" of Plats, Page 30, Spokane Coinnty, Washington.
EXCEPT Broadway A verlue.
TQCE'IHER WITH lhat porllOJl of 20 foot vacated slrip lying easlerly vf .said Lol S ajicl
ttartherly of Broadwcry A vemue.
~ ~
P~~.....~•~,
~G`^~~
~
- . ~
t~`~,~;,~ GlgTEP,,:~JQ• _ Mr~L LA~~ ~
~i EXOiRES 4/23/9¢
~.L4 r !5- 94-
.
Change of Conditions Requiring Rezoning
Background
The area is about ten miles from the center of Spokane. it is approximately 1-1/2 miles east of
the Sullivan exit and has aiways been perceived as "far out" by people living in Spokane. Since
Barker Road is only approximately 4 miles from Idaho, it was often easier for a business to "go
the extra mile" and move over to Idaho.
At ihe same time the Interstate was built in the mid 1960's and this opened the area to changing
uses. About ten years after it opened Gordon Curry decided he wanted to operate a motel,
restaurant, and truck stop at this exit and in 1976 he went in for a zone change to Freeway
Commercial.
The project failed for lack of financing and the land sat dormant designated Freeway Commercial.
Meanwhile the character of the neighborhood changed from rural orchards and small lanes to
a haven for trailers and people looking for country lifestyles. While they never moved close to
this area, the entire part of the 1981 Comprehensive Plan reflected this rural lifesfyle with urban
as the designation.
The planners failed to notice the mistake that they had placed both sides of the freeway in
industrial but had omitted this piece which was already zoned Freeway Commerciaf.
Across the Freeway United Paint, Capp Homes, Evergreen Lumber, Georgia Pacific, GTX Truck
Stop, Alpine Motel, KOA Kampground, Sonderen Box, and several other commercial businesses
had located. On ihe south side of the freeway a commercial saddle shop had located at the
interchange. -
All up and down the freeway commercial development was happening. Sulfivan Road
announced three shopping centers and Sullivan has developed into a major commercial street.
At the same time the next interchange and the last freeway cloverleaf before Idaho intended to
build a shopping center with Cafaro, but the project felt through. The land is still constantly
offered as a site for future commercial expansion. Across the street a new zip trip came in and
succeeded along Harvard Road, and recently a 50,000 sq ft Albertsons opened and four more
businesses totalling 60,000 square feet are being planned for opening next year adjacent to the
Albertsons.
Across the State Line ihe development has been explosive during the 18 years. The Greyhound
track is well established since 1988. The Factory Outlet stores were meadowland in 1987 and
today they are announcing their third phase in just 6 years. The Jacklin Riverbend Industrial
Park has built seven buildings over the last five years and continues to expand. And across the
highway theWatson interests have announced a new Fred Meyer store on 600 acres of park with
a huge complex of businesses. All up and down the fdaho I-90 corridor the land is disappearing
with consiruction and projects.
In fact, the only area not yet built on is the last meadows for the four miles from 6arker to the
Idaho border. Some land lacks sewer and some has poor roads. Some have unwilling sellers
and hesitant buyers. Water districts serving the area are not taking on new accounts. So the
• ,
meadowland is there because government has not found an easy way to allow simple
development.
Appleway
At the same time Appieway has been in a state of transition. From Suliivan Road to the entry
to the Freeway things are rapidfy changing. Businesses are buying up the remaining open land
and prices are skyrocketing. The rural fifestyle is disappearing and all the acreage is going
commercial.
The land between Barker, Appleway, and interstate 90 is a prime triangie of useable land. It
serves no purpose as urban which is the designation on the comprehensive pfan. In fact, ihere
is little housing in the area and the transition is definitely to commercial use. In the last few
years with bus transportation available, sewer adjacent to Appleway, and all services readiiy
available, the area has become ripe for change. A new post office at Barker and Appleway, and
a new convenience store on both opposite corners signals the start of commercial uses.
Appleway has Staley Oil, a new fire station, and Olympic Boat Marine as a few of their users in
this triangle. An upholstery shop, insulation company, and other smaller businesses dot the
area and the predominant characteristic of the neighborhood has changed to a commercial use.
Broadway
This specific area has been held back because the ownership has been predominantly in the
hands of two parties - neither wanting to sell. Gordon Currie owned over 30 acres adjoining the
freeway for 1/2 mile and fronting on Appleway for 1,000 feet. The adjacent 1,400 feet on the
freeway are owned by Inland Empire Paper who also fronts for 1,400 feet on Appleway. They
also do not intend selling their land. Therefore the land has sat fallow for many decades.
In the past two years has the land in this area has become dear. Dramatic growth and a lack
of good commercial sites has forced more and more businesses to look out farther from the city
borders. Frankly, there is little {and left that adjoins the freeway and has services available and
this piece of (and may be one of the few (if not the last piece) that meets all the criteria for
commercial use along the freeway. It has good service roads, fire, water, and sewer. It is
large enough to plan its use well and landscape liberally.
The Changing Conditions .
In 1981 when the Comprehensive Plan was implemented this land was already known to be a
commercial site since it had been rezoned five years prior. In 1991 the land was changed to
read - B-3 without the owner's input. That may or may not have been a good choice.
Whatever the case, the urban designation did not fit this area. Housing along the freeway is the
poorest choice for land use. This area is far removed from those days when urban housing
would have made sense. Businesses that rely on the freeway and ihe business they can
support are a proper use for this area. The land was zoned Freeway Commercial for 16 years
which meant that the predominant use was gas station, motel, restaurants, retail, novelty stores,
and chocolate/confectionery stores. These are tourist orientated retail businesses.
Our use is similar. We intend to attract people from the neighborhood and freeway. Otherwise
if we were really a food plant we could have located in an obscure location on low priced land.
/ 1 4
The proof of our sincerity is that we have paid a lot for very visible land. We want to build a
Factory Store and Viewing Piant where the public can see product made and packaged.
Restaurants do that to a limited degree. This activity is orientated to the pubiic.
We will be retailing to the public many products. Some we wiii make and some we simply resell
like any siore.
The Spokane County Planning Department has administratively ruled that our use is less of a
candy/confectionery business. They are labeling us a Food Products Manufacturing (Not
Otherwise Indicated).
The zoning for a candy/confectionery business parallels that zoning for restaurants. They
prepare and se11 of food to the public - even though they make the products they sell.
The category of a Food Products Manufacture - Not Otherwise Indicated falls in the Industrial-2
Zoning.
Rather than appeal their administrative decision it was agreed that a request for rezoning under
a portion of the land as I-2 would be a better solution. It keeps the issue in accordance with
both parties wishes. Rezoning is usually a process that has a negative impression. In this
case we adjoin an industriai piece of land on both the north and west. Therefore, this is a
transition zone. Ours is more a need to comply with a situation that has no right answer. The
plan does not speak to roasting and selling nuts. Therefore we must be fit into some category
which may be open to interpretation.
We are asking for a new B-3 designation for the other part of the land to keep in compiiance with
the reasonable use of this type of land as a tourist and retail use area adjacent to the freeway.
This part of our land adjoins a B-3 on the other two sides and is compatible with the surrounding
zoning.
We only have four neighbors near us and two of them are across the freeway. Nobody has
expressed any negatives and I think we are a fine addition to the mixture of businesses in the
area.
Summation
This area will continue to move to a business orientation. Our business is a clean activity with
little impact on ihe neighborhood. We offer an unusual food activity and a lot of fun for those
who want fun in their life. The need for an industrial zone classification is an anomaly of the
zoning code and the result of an interpretation by the people who make those decisions. The
procedure that allows us to locate this business in that area is expensive and time consuming,
but I believe we have a lot to offer and this location is excellent for both our use and the people
who live in this county.
~ . ♦ i` , -.C.' ;Htis'~ y ~ -T e-C;,~ , r'1 q
18=84C~?>~ ~ _ • ~
J ;Q-
~ ~ ~ f17 r Z Z B , .ii: i~ .~tJa~'T • ~ a~~ : ~`~Ji' . ; ~
1~ ~ ;Y s ; ~ I1- • ~ ~
. ~ ~ • Y ; . t- x•:~ , . ~o . :~~,~~:ss:9, _ .
. . . r ; _ ~ = ~'t ~,j~~~ ,~.+y,., ~ ~ ~l
• ~r''."••"t .~~c'- - °t
• ' ~ • ~ •~7 ' ~ ' ' - ~ _..f r:n~~~~ , e~t^ f'~'j4 ' S.~,i E~r~ _
~ ~~~~z.,,.~.~~~ ` r ~
• • ~ 6 ~ ~ ; ~
I ~ Sn'lt~ ~♦7'
. • \ !i ~ ~ , , ~ ' ~ > . ~ r- ~"j~ll: „~`;~3+ .•i~ ~ r~, :~lj,'b' ~ ~ ~ A~~f'`..~Gw~[
l I c. f . ' ' • k.~. .+~,`~~t i{ ~`LC'~'~ t • ♦ i»CT~1~~' .!.yi•a
, • 2 ~ I ' - k' ~•-~r 4 ~ ~ r ~\~a: ~ ~ ~ • • 'Y~
C.. 4'•s' e Q ~ ~
' ' ✓ • 2 Z ~ ~ ' ~ , :'i/'O• ~ r ,
7.7
. / d -t. ~ - ! , ~ ' ' ~ / l ~ - • • . • c~., u• ~,~5~
.t: - ;..F .,,•;i~ * h~~"
~ . ,O
, r /'J~~(/~/~-\/~ j I ' ~ ( ` r ' w. .t'~•!" -"`YR?'•' ..y_g _ .
X~
J\l
~ _ 1 . Y 4 / - Q ~ • 't h 4Y•
URaleS ' 39
yg 28 6 - 57
~ ~ ~ L - 3 ~ • ' ' ~:5: . . .
O
I f _ ~ ~ . • . , . . .
g~w ^
0= . - I , . . _ - , • ^ , ' .
•~J f . ` ~ I I p ~ ? . • o~ .
' ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ , • .
_ - - `f / `J_ h • - - - - - ~ ~ - - ~ -0- - - ~ ' ~ _ ~ - i~~/~V_. . ~ _ •
7--'0 C~ l Y r--
-.1 ~ 1/- ~
t j- a . ~
. .
~ g
; 194-7I C
. ~ • O J~
4o-7i
. ~
M ~ -
237 . ~ .~.~o • ,~d' o •
A CA T E J;- 3 O:,S~ •R OA U. F/ L L•" ~
~
47~' ~ O' ~PO' I
~ L I 4' ` • ' - ' . , • ~
J / _~9• ~--r I~.~ . ' ~ ' / ; -
J 1
, a ~ = G ~ • . , -
, . .
~
0 R/W DEEO ~ ro couivrr ~ ;CATALDD ; . ~J"~~~r , - ~a,q l/E
:n~ i . ~ ~ - ~ • ~ i
t
~
~ _ p~ • ~ _ . I _ { ~ ,
. \ `U ~ ~ , , •
...(RAM , 'a B=3
.
h'
13J-76C ~
O ' 1r p1~v I < I ~ . ~
. . ~ ~ . . ~
2 2 - 9ZC
cT'.-- • : ,3v~ . . . . . - . 3oh.,~, w~,,. .~Y~.
, . , ~ • - • _ , , . _ . . . ' ,'t w
~ ~3 Gf/, - ~ ~ .8.!".r ' > ; ' ~ - - • ' ' ' - . ~ ;
' ~ • ~ . /1/ 9-9
• ~ . ! ~ . ~.+.c~c.,c~r..-~c:v. 2Nr-..~...~~.... .t-~-`~~.z+4+n+4-. . _,ise- 1+. ~%wiv+. , /rv~;+....~, ~f-« . .,opn~ .7w: . c ,'Y~,My,Q.,*~
_r ( n ~ . ~ ' • . ' . . . ' ~ - . . . . . . . . . • • ~ tw . , C
• " Y ~ _ ' . . . , ` ~ ~f • `
` -e`• O ' ti-~` ' ~y ' <°:k~ ' ' r
Po° 9 ~6 ~,:;;?i'-.~~ 4~'~" .;~A O ~ - ' , • • '
~9~ • ~~s .y, `IroO " ~ - . • ~ c ~ - - . ' : , - •
~ ~ C,~ Y Y •
~.90 ~ •~ii~~ • . - . /
' ' ''~4~ } • 7 - ~ ~ , ~ " . ~ ' . .
' • ' • • _~~T r'+,l.-~~ . aU . _ ' , ' ' . '
~ t i . . ~ ~ . r • ' _ - ' : _ ; 1-r' ; _ _
~ ; : , . . ~ . . . - ; : . .
~1~-. . . . • - , .
7 • '4 ~ ~ 'i'~' ti`~ i •~.S ~ ' ' ' ' i S ~ f `~d . Y : .
~~~6 i . c , ' f: 1`y ~r`~`~'f!,~'?.~'~ `~N . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ . ' ~ _ ;S • E,' • - ' ,e,~ . a
~:,•ys'S:;~y,a'r}~„~,~ ,?:".'y . - • . . . ' • '~'va •
7./i'°. . _ ' • - . • . c~ . . _ . . _..i:-'..5t.~~i•;+..i~''•~,en"r-.. i
:~,D j ~~.r• y~ 2~•~1t;< ,
• - -r • - . - •
• ' ~ -
V1I . ~ . , ~ t1,=~N` ;'~r::'p-, • .
17)0 . ' ~ • 0
~ . ~ S. 6
Im2 ~
94-71 C ~ . -
,
V ' ' i ~ , ' ~ •
d , . .
. .
~,~qi . . . . ~ -
O 6 J--9. 6 ' ~ ~ ~ v~~P~ WAS
IY~
y••...2
. . o ~ \ _ 1 , ~ ~o: •'J~ ~ - - -
s • 5~
/ P r, i s' ~ ~~rST~P Q ~ • -
/pNql lANO
. ~ .
. ~ i EXt'1RES 412319f
' ~ . ~..i~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ Si
139 - 6 C
~ ~ . . ~ . . ~ .
. ~ v . . .
, . r.. , . . . ~ S3
• i+ ~ '1 , " • - , - .,~rY_~'•,-t•: ' • • .
7' °4'" ' : ji • . • • - ' Y~ • ~ f' ' i.`~,•
i i-~ • _a ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ` , ' . •~'r' . , .
' ,(~.7 , ' , , ~,T , • : . , .
F E jo~i.: . . • . ~ ~ , ' 1 ?
~-r.-.+~. . v~ T N~ ' ~ ' , ~ i . , , .....dd-- ..r~....~.. q. . _ .~.,~.s..~.~.....~. .......i~~ _ _r.wri.,...w i°R*'bs!~rhC!!L~~W"~K'~" ° ~ .
~~.~F' . . . . . . . ~ • I . .
-A'~ tr+.f.•.. I' _ '
~~'S .4~~1_ a • . . • . Y~';• , - -
rl
•
RECEIPT SUMMARY
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9400659 DATE: 04/15/94
APPLICANT: TRANCO INDUSTRIES PHONE=
ADDRESS: P O BOX 55
SPOKANE WA 99210
CONTACT NAME: TR.ANCO INDUSTRIES PHONE=
TRANSACTION: RE-ZONE
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMNlARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAL DUE = 220.00
, TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
°AYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHLCIC## PAYMENT AitiIOUNT
04/15/94 00003904 2062 220.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU
~ a .
' 4223050 ~ 0020j1998 o04:47P
00 ENG AGR $0.00 Spokane Co, YU
After Recording Retiirn To: Spokane Courtty Engincer
Attn.: Rtght of Way Department .
. ; .
~r .
Document Title:'. otice to the Public No. G
Grantor(s): ~ANCO INDUS'TRIES. INC.
Grantee(s): SPbK#NE'•COUNTY
Lega) Description: NWI , SEC. 17, TWN. 25 NORTH, RG. 45 EAST, W. M.
Additiona! Legal Description: ON PAGE 2
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(X): 55172.0420
Refcrence Nurnber:
Lag In Date:_ -4=28-98 Requcsted by: VERRIL PrepAred by: RM
Purpose:, ,RF No(X).: 443-F Road ~lame(k): BROADWAY AVENUF
.-*0010 SPOKANE COU,NTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
SPokane CountY, Washington
,r
NO. 6
NOTICE TO THE PUIiLIC
IN THE MATTER OF RID WAIVER, AGREEMENT AND COVENANT: KNOW ALL MEN
BY THESE PRESENTS, I'hat TRANCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
being the owners of the followitlg described lacids in consideralion of Mutual Benelits now or to
be hereafter derivcd, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successors in interest
hereby request and autliorize Spokane County to incleide the below describeci property in a Road
Irnprovement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement Districi for
improvement of the road(s) describcd below by requesting and autliorizing Spokane County to
place their name on a pctition for formation of a Road Improvemcnt District pursuant to RCW
36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane Courity tu cast tlieir ballot in favor of a RID
being forrned under the resolution tnethod pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, andJor by not filing a
protest against the formation of a RID being formed utider the altcrnative resolution method
provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW.
If an RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described heiow, said owners and
successors further agree: (I) tlzat the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible, and (2) tliat tlie benefits to be derived from the fonnation of the RID
by the properly inctuded therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that tlle property withiit the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed; provided, tliemselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successors shalt
retain the right, as autliorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result of the improvemcnts called for in conjunction with ihe fonnation of a RID by
either the petilion or resolution metltod under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the superior
court the decision of the Board of County Cammissioners confirming the final assessment roll;
provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so
long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increascd true and fair valuc the improvement(s)
add(s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any county road .
improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvenients required shall be at the
sole expense of the owtiers of property within the RID or served by tlle improvements without
any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RiD waiver contained in this agreement shall expire atlcr ten (10) years from the date of
execution below.
~
' w
. 4223050
Pa9e, 2 of 2
. ' ' 061201998 04:41P
C4 ENG AGR f 0.04 Spgane Co, M The above conditions and covenant apply to tlie following described property:
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S).: 55172.0420
TRACY 8, BLOCK 3 OF CORBIN ADDITION TO GREENACRES AS PER PLAT THERF,OF
RECORDED IN VOLUME "S", PAGE 30, LYING SOUTH OF THE STA^_'E HIGHWAY (I-90)
AND VACATED 20.00 FOOT WIDE ROAD RIGHT OF I4AY ADJACENT ON THE EAST.
LOCATED IN TH NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH,
RANGE 45 EAST,. W. M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASIiINGTOtd.
This Agreement applies to the improvecnent of HARKER / BROADWAY AVENUE RF.AT..~,~? T~~'~,_,
RF N0443-E by grading, draining, surfacing, curbing, paving, sidewalk construction including
traffic control facilities and related wock. AND TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PAVEMEPdT OVERLAY
ON BROADWAY BETWEEN BARKER ROAD ANn HODGES ROAD.
These requirements are and shall run with thc la»d and shall be binding upon the owners, their
heirs, successors or assigns.
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this
.
day of MAY , 1998
~
By: BY: .
,
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss
I certify tllat I know oc have satisfactory evidence that
(is/are) the individual(s) who appeared before me, and said individual(s) acknowledgeci that
(he/she/they) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she/they) (was/were) authorized
to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the
Of TRANCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
a' MC'~"c~ ~
, ~ 199
Dated this j ' • i"~
cuj~ Kor~Y
c!~ ~ pUBLiC
~to;~~ ~ NUTARY;PffBLIC
WASNIn and for the State of Washington,
resicling at Spokane.
My appointment expires
rwforms\notice to public 6 corp notary\bc
2
} t ,~g.. m
1
i ~ t
E E ~m
E
i
j
F F I
f
l
a
~ ~ ~ y..
~
~t r
1
s
E i
~e
-
{
; 1
....n ~ _ - I
a
i
~ ~ ~ ~ i
S
i E t
R.m
i
i
.
g
1
x
a
< A:~a,w ,s~.s mss.
a
s . ,
,
a
N
~
a
m
..._w.w....,..,.. ac•, , ae:~¢u. Freww,~~ i. ~r,~~ var..a+c;:~.~ .
.»„z;a~w..~xa w.; ~ .,~r~. ~o.a~.x,,a.,. sr w, ~ gyn., :~~ha»„~ ,,.,~»s„~, w~~~~.....,.:rva.,.,. ~~~~x:,
" •:m.wa•
" p
" „
00
"
~ mms
„
„ " rM
"
b.
x
.3 ri F, w
ra
:.~:~w:... rrg._~x.wx.. ;-qcw~=_.:..°s: x4 ~a~i s~:°: ~5. #&-.'i~ies.~~,
, t' ' . E .
k~
.
~ ~ ate.. ~ ~~~a~~~~~ .
a
xt.
5
r,. fi r_ ~
~
.
ti
g
il
,
t,
~
...m....... .,.....m...
. .