ZE-0027-97
r ~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING E R RECEVED
SEP 14 1999
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban ) FINDINGS 0F~6&&0UNTY ENGINEER
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone to ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Light Industrial (I-2) Zone ) AND DECISION
Applicant: Donwood, Inc. )
File No. ZE-27-97 )
1. SUMMA.RY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassification from 4he Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5)
zone to the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, on approximately 4.75 acres of land, for recreational vehicle •
and boat sales, storage and repair, and those uses allowed in the I-2 zone.
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions.
H. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT
A. GeneralInformation Applicant: Donwood, Inc., 502 North Glenn Road, Spokane; VVA 99206
Site Owner: Same as applicant.
Site Location: Generally located along the north side of Appleway Avenue, approxirriately
1/3 mile east of the intersection of Appleway Avenue and'Barker Road, in the SW '/4 of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
.
Legal Description: County Assessor's Tax Parcel No. 55173.0511 .
Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5).
Comprehensive Plan: Urban category. The property is also located within the Priority
Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Comprehtnsive Plan.
IUGA: The site is inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by the County
pursuant to the State Growth Management Act.
Environmental Review: A Detemunation of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division of
Building and Planning on July 11, 1997.
Site Description: The site is approximately 4.75 acres in size, triangular in shape 3nd
relatively flat. The southwesterly portion of the site is currcntly improved -vvith a non-
conforming recreational vehicle and boat sales office, associated storage yard and repair shop.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision 7E-27-97 Page 1
s
!
.
The parking and storage area on site is unpaved, but has outdoor lighting and is surrounded by a
cyclone fence. The remainder of the site is vegetated with native grasses and a few pine trees.
The buildings on the site are currently served with public sewer. The site was previously
operated as a florist shop.
Surrounding Conditions: Appleway Avenue adjacent to the site is designated as a Principal
Arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan, and is improved to 4lanes. The County has a
combined right of way width of approximately 170 feet south of the site, including the right of
way for Appleway Avenue and adjacent right of way acquired by the County in an abandoned
railroad right of way. A sewer interceptor has been installed by the County in the abandoned
railroad right of way. West of the site, Appleway Avenue merges into Sprague Avenue, which is
also designated as a Principal Arterial. Sprague Avenue and Appleway Avenue to the west
comprise major traffic and commercial corridors in the Spokane Valley area. Barker Road to the
west is designated as Principal Arterial, and has an interchange with Interstate 90 (I-90)
northwest of the site. To the east, Appleway Road accesses eastbound I-90 and the Liberty Lake
area of the county. An old canal ditch containing a new sewer collector line extends along the
north boundary of the site.
The land lying north of the site is zoned Regional Business (B-3), and is undeveloped.
The land lying east and southeast of the site is designated in the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan, is zoned I-2, and is used for agricultura] purposes or vacant. The land
lying immediately west of the site, north of Appleway Avenue, is zoned UR-3.5, and consists of
a fire station (with for sale sign), single-family residences and vacant land. A wood fence is
located along the west property line of the site. Further to the west, the land is designated in the
Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, zoned B-3 and developed Nvith various
commercial uses. The land lying south of the site, Appleway Avenue and the abandoned railroad
right of way is zoned Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). Such land is developed with single-family
homes, which are primarily manufactured homes. A row of trees is located along the north side
of Laberry Drive north of the park. " .
Project Description:, The dpplication proposes to rezone the site to the I-2 zone, for
development of recreational vehicle sales office and service shop, in association with the
applicant's existing and adjacent business. The site development plan of record submitted on
5-1-97 is general in nature and does not indicate specifie uses other than the existing ones.
Future development areas are shown in the easterly and northerly portions of the site.
B. ProceduralInformation
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Cbapters 14.402 and 14.632
Hearing'Date and Location: August 6, 1997, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower
Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: July 15, 1997 by applicant
Posted: July 17, 1997 by applicant
-Published: July 17, 1997
Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision 7E-27-97 - Page 2
r
~..R! r •
Site Visit: August 5, 1997
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294
Testimony:
Francine Shaw Pat Harper
Division of Building and Planning Division of Engineering and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 Gordon Curry Carl Bold
502 North Glenn Road 10319 East Sprague
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206
Gene Cohen (no address given)
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, County Zoning Code and County
Code. County Resolution Nos. County Resolution No. 96-0787 (amending industrial zones of
Zoning Code), 97-0321 (establishing IUGA interirxi regulations), 97-0134 (establishing NGA
boundaries), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure), 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner
Ordinance) and 85-900 (adopting County Zoning Code, and adopting Program to Implement the
Spokane County Zoning Code). Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report.
M. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAND USE ANALYSIS
A. AnDroval criteria
In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that 1) there is no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridge v.
Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462, 573 P.2d 359 (1978); and Bjarnson v. Kitsap Coacnty, 78 Wn. App.
840, 899 P.2d 1290 (1995).
A comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation by local
governments. Only general conformance with a comprehensive plan is required to approve a
rezone. See Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873, 947 P.2d
1208 (1997); Cathcart v. Snohomish County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12, 634 P.2d 853 (1981). Where
a comprehensive plan conflicts with zoning regulations, zoning regulations will usually be
construed to prevail. See Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County, 124 Wn.2
d 26, 43 (1994); 873 P.2d 498 (1994).
The County Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Hearincr Examiner to grant, deny
or grant with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to
make a land use application cornparible with the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan and applicable development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment
"A", paragraphs 7(d) and section 11; and RCW 36.70.970. Development regulations include
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 P a g e 3
1
without limitation the County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the
County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code).
. Section 14.402.020 of the Zoning Code authorizes amendments to the Code based on any
one of 6 grounds, without differentiating between zoning text revisions and amendments to the
official zoning map. Zoning Code 14.402.020 (1) authorizes the Code to be amended if it is
. consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare".
Zoning Code 14.402.020 (2) authorizes a Code amendment where .[c]hange in economic,
- technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification of this Code". These
are the most relevant local criteria for consideration of the current rezone application.
B. The nroposed rezone. as conditioned, izenerally conforms with the Spokane Countv
Generalized Comurehensive Plan: bears a substantial relationship to and will not be detrimental
to the nublic health. safetv and eeneral welfare: and complies with the Spokane Countv ZoninQ
Code and other anolicable develovment reLyulations.
The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban
category is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes
various land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban
services. It is primarily a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family, and
condominium buildings along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and
recreational facilities. Most major commercial uses and heavy industrial uses would be
considered incompatible with the Urban category.
The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of one (1) to 17 units per
acre. The more intensive uses in the Urban category, such as light industrial and neighborhood
cammercial, are expected to be located near or along the heavily traveled streets. The least
intensive single-family residential uses will be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily structures will usually be a transitional use located between single-family residential
and the more intensive areas. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed
Definition". Residential uses are discouraged within high noise level zones such as in the
vicinity of airports, railroads and freeways. See Objective 1.5.d and Decision Guideline 1.5.6.
- Buffering, screening and landscaping should be used to render land uses in such category
compatible and avoid adverse impacts. Decision Guideline 1.5.1..
The applicant seeks to rezone the site from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the
Light Industrial (I-2) zone, to allow the existing commerciaUlight industrial uses and the vacant
land on the site to be developed under the I-2 zone. The purpose and intent of the I-2 zone are set forth in Zoning Code 14.632.100, as follows: .
The purpose of the I-2 zone is to meet the needs for industrial land
identified in the Industrial Category of the Comprehensive Plan. -
Indzrstrial uses in this zone will include processing, fabrication, light
assembly, freight handling ancl similar operations, all of a non-offensive
nature. It is the intent of the I-2 zone to allow for these uses by making
them compatible with surrouncling ticses. General characteristics vf these areas inclucle paved roads and sidewalks, plcblic setiver and water, a firll
HE Findin~s, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 4
L' , - r„-v.. i• ;F ry.,.. . ~ ..*.j~c.
r
1
line of public services including manned'fire protection and public transit
accessibility.
The Board of County Commissioners recently amended the Industrial Zones Matrix,
Zoning Code Chapter 14.629, to allow several new commercial uses and industrial uses within
the zones of the Zoning Code. See County Resolution No. 96-0787. In the I-2 zone, this
includes certain designated uses as well as virtually all uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-
3) zone, provided the development standards of the B-3 zone are met. - The I-2 zone is intended to unplement the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan,
not the Urban category. The Urban category does contemplate light industrial uses along the
more heavily traveled streets. Light industrial uses in the Urban category are intended to be
implemented through the Industrial Park (I-1) zone. Recreational vehicle and boat sales, repair
and maintenance are prohibited in the I-1 zone, but are a permitted use in the I-2 zone. See
Zoning Code Chapter 14.629.
The development standards of the I-1 zone are generally considerably stricter than those of
the I-2 zone. In the I-2 zone, storage of all raw materials, finished products, machinery and
equipment must either be within an enclosed building or behind a sight-obscuring, non-pierced
fence that is at least 6 feet in height and at a sufficient height to screen stored items from view.
Such screening may be waived if adjacent properties are zoned industrial or have existing industrial uses, and the owners of such adjacent properties do not object to such waiver. See
Zoning Code 14.632.355. The I-2 zone requires 5 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to a
public road. See Zon.ing Code 14.806.060.
In the I-1 zone, finished products may be stored outside only in the back half of a lot, and
all unfinished products or raw materials must be stored within an enclosed building. Zoning
Code 14.630.355. A 6-foot high sight-obscuring screen is required adjacent to or across a public
street from existing residential development in the I-1 Zone. Zoning Code 14.630.365. The I-1
zone requires that at least 10% of a site be landscaped, and requires 25 feet of Type III
landscapina, adjacent to a public road. See Zoning Code 14.630.350
Considering the purpose and intent of the I-2 zone, and the existing uses on the site, the
Examiner agrees with the Staff Report that the proposed rezone does not implement the Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan. . The site touches the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan at its southeast
triangular point. The Comprehensive Plan defines the "`transition area" as the area along the
boundary between two or more land use categories. Under the "transition policy", where a
specific proposal crosses the boundary between 2 or more land use categories, or lies adjacent to
another land use category, the proposal may be deemed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
if 1) it complies with the policies of either category, and 2) will not adversely impact or
excessively intrude into the land use categories involved. Buffering may be used to mitigate
such impacts and intrusion. See Comprehensive Plan, p. 11, and definition of "transitional area"
and "transitional buffering" in the glossary.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 5
%
The Industrial category is intended to provide the opportunity for industrial development and
reserve land for industrial purposes, and will typically be composed of a variety of industrial, mining
and transportation uses. Few residential uses will be found. The Industrial category text states that
few commercial uses will be found. Commercial uses would typically include small-scale activities
related to industrial uses such as cafes, service stations and parts and service stores; and commercial
services provided to serve the industrial businesses and employees as industrial areas develop. See
Comprehensive Plan, Section 7.
The Industrial category indicates that industrial proposals, and industrial and commercial uses
proposed as one development, may be allowed in the Industrial category when the development
proposal conforms to County sewer, water, utility and transportation plans, identifies and takes steps
to resolve significant adverse impacts upon existing infrastructure, and provides necessary
landscaping and buffering. Decision Guidelines 7.1.4, 7.3.1. The Industrial category discourages
strictly non-industrial proposals, unless it is shown that the land involved is near other non-industrial
land use categories, there is sufficient remaining land in the Industrial category to meet existing or
near future industrial needs, and the proposal is compatible with existing or potential industrial uses
through the use of buffering or suitable development covenants. See Decision Guideline 7.2.5.
The Industrial category states that large or medium scale industrial sites, relative to other sites
in the Industrial category, should be duectly accessible to highways, freeways, arterial roadways or
airways, and should not overload or congest such routes. The number of driveway or ingress and
egress access locations onto highways or arterials are to be minimized, by providing frontage roads
with limited access shared by other development, providing side street access to the highway or
arterial, or sharing limited access facilities through private frontage roads. Decision Guideline 7.1.3.
Buffering is recommended in the Industrial category between proposed and existing
development, particularly when heavy industrial development is located adjacent to light industrial
or commercial uses. See Decision Guidelines 7.1.4 and 7.2.2. The rndustrial category indicates that
only light industry should be located adjacent to an existing or proposed residential area. Decision
Guideline 7.1.1. Proposed industrial developments which are not adjacent to residential
development or residential categories, and which are anticipated either to improve the aesthetics or
the value of surrounding industrial property, should not be required to provide any buffering beriveen
themselves and existing or potential industrial activity. Decision Guideline 7.2.2.
The County's recent amendments to the I-2 zone to allow virtually all B-3 uses expresses a
need for more intensive commercial uses in the 1-2 zone to provide support for light industrial uses.
Objective 7.2.a of the Industrial category encourages balanced communities of commercial,
industrial and residential development in a compatible relationship.
No opposition to the project was expressed at the public hearing. Four (4) letters of
opposition were received from residents in the manufactured home park located to the south, expressing concern over increased air pollution, traffic, noise etc. from increased development of
the site under the I-2 zone, and incompatibility of'such uses with nearby residential uses.
However, the manufactured home park is located approximately 220 feet south of the site.
Between the park and the site are Appleway Road, an abandoned railroad right of way conveyed
to Spokane County, Laberry Drive and a tall row of trees. These factors buffer the proposa] from
the park.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 6
The proposed expansion of development on the site is generally away from the
manufactured home park, toward the B-3 zone to the north, and the Industrial category and I-2
zoning to the east. The land lying north of the site, the land lying between the site and the
Industrial category to the east, and most of the land lying between the site and Barker Road to the
west is zoned Regional Business (B-3). The I-2 zone allows virtually all B-3 uses, subject to
development under the standards of the B-3 zone.
Neither County Engineering or the Washington State Department of Transportation
expressed any objections regarding the proposed rezone. The proposed conditions of approval
authorize County Engineering, depending on the intensity of uses installed on the site, to require
the applicant to install a center turn lane on Appleway Avenue adjacent to the site, in the form of
asphalt widening, curb and sidewalk.
The above factors indicate that the proposal is a good candidate for application of the
transition policy. The I-2 zone expressly implements the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan, and the project is consistent with the Industrial category. See Zoning Code
14.632.100. The proposal does not intrude excessively into the Urban category, and is well-
buffered from the manufactured home park located south of Appleway Avenue. The site is not
suitable for residential development under the Urban category, considering its proximity to
Appleway Avenue, and I-2 and B-3 zoning. .
The north side of Appleway Avenue in the vicinity is in transition toward more commercial
development. There was no opposition to the project from land uses lying north of Appleway
Avenue, which are mostly commercial. The fire district, which has its station for sale directly
west of the site, expressed support for the project. See testimony of Carl Bold. The owner of
land lying north of the site, which is zoned B-3, expressed support for the project. See testimony
of Gene Cohen. A change of conditions was recently approved to the 1976 rezone of such site
under the now expired County Zoning Ordinance, to allow more flexibility in -development of
such land under the B-3 zone. See Building and File No. ZF-139A-76. The project is reasonably
compatible with surrounding land uses.
The conditions of approval require the applicant to dedicate 30 feet of right of way for the
extension of Hodges Road, and the applicable radius for its intersection with Appleway Avenue.
Per Scott Engelhard of County Engineering, the Examiner is advised that Hodges Road has been
vacated and this condition is no longer needed. The conditions relating to Hodges Road have
been stricken. Landscaping, screening and paving issues can be dealt with by the Division of
Building and Planning at the time of building permit application.
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the Determination of
Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning, and finds that there will be no
significant, probable adverse environmental impacts from the project. No adverse comments
were received from public agencies that would dictate a need for withdrawal of such
environmental deternunation.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 7
r
3. Conditions in the area in which the propertv is located have chanRed substantiallv since the
Dronertv was last zoned.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County
Zoning Code Section 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on. its own facts. Bassani v. County
Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993). Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a
comprehensive plan. Bjarnson, at 846; Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish County, 99
Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983).
In Buell v. Bremerton, 80 Wn. 2d 518 (1972), the Washington State Supreme Court
authorized deviation from acomprehensive plan to allow rezoning activity which increased the
area in which a particular business use was permitted. The current situation is analogous, since
the proj ect would tend to expand the applicant's existing business onto the site.
As discussed above,,the proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
There is also ample evidence of changed conditions in the area since the last zoning of the site,
including desire expansion of the applicant's existing business, the extension of public sewer to
the area, increasEd traffic along Appleway Avenue, population growth in the Spokane Valley
. area of the county, and the change of condition approved in File No. ZE-139A-76.
IV. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the above application for a zone
reclassification is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies
specified below. Conditions which have been added or previously recommended conditions .
which have been significantly altered are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
. approval by.the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDI.NG AND PLANNI1i 1G
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the ".Applicant,"
which term shall include the developer and owner (s) of the property, and their heirs, assigns and
successors.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Light Industrial (I-2) zone and other applicable
provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
3. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner and the site plan of recorcl submitted on May 19, 1997,
- subject to compliance with the conditions of approval herein. Variations, when approved by the
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 8 .
. ,
c
Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted, including, but not
limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone.
All variations must conform to the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
4. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Building and Plarul.ing/designee
of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permit. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture sha11 not extend over the
property boundary.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule anci provisions for the maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Building and Planriing/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any building
permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is .
not obscured or impaired.
6. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Plarining. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action
by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on August 6, 1997, imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. ZE-27-97 is available for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. 7. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within
the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from tbe final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to issuance of any building pernut for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsibly for complying with the provisions of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The
property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as [
SPOKANE*COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: .
1. The Hodges Road right of way has been vacated by Spokane County, so there is no
dedication reqacirement for such right of way.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer. .
HE Findings; Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 9
/
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
6. Based upon the intensity of proposed uses the County Engineer may require a center turn
lane to be installed on Appleway which is adj acent to the proposed development. This will
require the addition of approximately 14-16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development. An RID/CRP Agreement shall be executed for the installation of curbing and
sidewalk along the frontage of Appleway.
7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
8. The.applicant shall construct paved and delineated approaches to meet th.e existing
pavement on Appleway.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
10. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the
following: .
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now
or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in
a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District
for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County
to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to
RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of
a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not
filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the altemative resolution
method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and
successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the -formation of the RID
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision - ZE-27-97 Page 10
~ .
is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by
either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior
Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll;
provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so
long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value irnprovement(s)
add(s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County
Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be
at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date
of execution below. This provision is applicable to curb and sidewallc on Appleway Avenue.
11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities for Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities for Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system shall be made available for the project and individual service
provided to each building. The use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems will not be
authorized.
5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed. A
sewer connection permit is required. This condition applies to any new use that is allowed
within the proposed zoning.
2. Applicant shall submit expressly to the Utilities Division, under separate cover, only those
plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and
facilities for review and approval. The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer
connection permit.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-27-97 Page 11
3. Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges shall be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit.
4. Any water service for this project sha1l be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. -
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION COIVTROL AUTHORITY
1. All applicable air pollution regulations must be met. See memorandum from SCAPCA to the
County Division of Building and Planning dated 7-22-97, in File No. ZE-27-97.
DATED this 14' day of September, 1999
SPOX:ANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
K ~
Mic el C. Dempsey, WSBA #8 5
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND N0TICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
determination is final and conclusive unless withiti ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9)
indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the board of county commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision.
This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on September 14, 1999. The
aWeal closing date is either September 24,1999 or September 28, 1999, denending on
which appeal period referenced above legaIlv aQ.plies.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal
period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner,l'hird Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490. The file rnay be
inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except
holidays, between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record
will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Z,E-27-97 Page 12
ZE_27-97 ~ Vicinity ~VI a
p
~
v 1 O
~ 4 Z
~I • ¢ f 4 V
' ~ ~ ~ ' . • I
\
~
!7-
'
~
9 .Z'~ ;
i~~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ _ t.,_ -i
/ 7
Fil0o0
> V .
~t f
i
1 ~
.M
► £
~
O O y ~ ~
Q J M ) •
t°s io~ ta~ tos t~
cs Iso
73 n• 1n rrs rr 7e nn too ie• iu 1u 1e4 w is~ ~ ,st ~s~ n~ ~o ia ~ mp m'
N p R"
i AXWEI.L 4'40( GmI~OCre3 5.;•%03,~ ~ 8
Q , Cf~.e►s~to.r) ~ y a ~ .
~ < ~ ~ N ~ ~
• W B0ON~` i
= ~
• « , ~ I
Q ~
ppOw[
~~A O AV [
.r , caEEwer o
v ~
'ER-STI►TE N16WaY N= 90
,
l ~
r-j r~ w~•V
C".C+G~' 1
rS
,
•
. .
. 3 _ j
~ T o~ci
` i~ o • _ %
~ N U ~ ^ ~ ~ • ♦ ~L` r~ w. ~ ~
C I
~T! • O ~ SPFIAG V t AVE ~ . • ~
/
R avE_
o i ~ :.o Y~o..o a ~
fou0ty"
wOVdmvM A.V~ q
~ r.C~r.1 r C ~ • 4 ,
f •
i •
v ~
~IGMTri AVE ~ .
_ - 9 - - - - + ~ ~ E
e a
.
A
S;fc P►Ao
6°`°"' c..X,.y
' 4e~
~ g
~ ~ _ . i:-~i~' 4 9 •1 ~ p ~ ` `
• , • J~G~~ ~ . , 'r~ 4 ~ ~ J~ G~,~,•~~
F~ ~%~;t~ • ~ ~ ; r p
lidER' r
,i ~ t•~ f, .
v,s
~.~q
. • ; y~i~,~ : 2 . ~ i ~ p~' R• R'
•
l{ . ~ , K~ •
p(Oeclelopeo'
r M.~~' ~ ~
67
Q • ~ ,
K ' .
♦ I ^1 . . .
o . . • .
n .
'►'~~--•--..F M uNDFdeloAEp ~ •
.
' kvu G'Cy~r•'~ I ' o . ' •
I --~:iaES
. •
F 4'f4RE ►11 "F1 TA I(e-41 F40e1
. ~ detE '
T~de~opnaNf ~I 2 ' ~do .
, yy,vr ' • I •
7S A cReS
, W. fr:! - ' • Fxcrtiet Zoco Ropaed Zone lktp •
. . J~ er~,,:~~ ~ / / 7S
.
j~~ r,~~ ~AY Uri•).3 1.2 ~
. N 4 , ar.,;.s ~r' - /
, ~,,•r
•00~ X albuit~ict oovv,~o 1.a 9 N,~ • 71ot iq' Lot 9 0!G la 10
r
~ . • ~ f .
fL~RECEIVEO ei~QlU'e S~amsoe sarage_
~
~ SPOKANE COUNTY ~
4 ~ ~ P~ ootn ~ f~0 pf rwt eF'fu~~~< IL✓<<~~ rPttin~T CunC~...l
I000 w*v
t tl
s d•(T ~i Q I I59 7 • IofPaddnj Spxes I pudlepim •Lat 9
.,r~ y - apen Spooe lot 9 All of ld 10
. OMSION Of BUILOUIG AND PLANNING
' . By,.' B1°tcfi"tScibacV, W•22R E•100A N33n S•300ft
F- ~'cyclc,,,a .
' `•Bu~da,.~f c.M,,.n~ 7o~,wa-199C
. N...:w,• ¢.n.~ r. w~.a w~~.~•t
R~VKEb S~TE RAN ~
f ~
Cancele+ ENGINEER' S FcEVIEW SHEET
nate F,«
Date ns Builc Plans Rcccivrci
Datc Road Flans Aprravrd REZONE FILE # ZE-0027-97 -97
Ncw Road StandaNs 5-I5-95 R4ylur
C'ompanion File
Hearing Date: 0810611997 H Time: 01:30 H Number: 3 Reiated File
DES1oN Rev'tew Datc: 03f20l 1997 DR Time: 01:15 Buiiding DX-pt
Review Date: R Timc: R Number: DESIGN REVIEW # DRZE-262-97
Date Rcxeivai: 03110/1997 Review Type: Large Lot ' Bldg. Squam Foec:
No. Lots: No. Acres: 4
Project Name: UR-3.5 'TO I-2 SAI.FS OFFICE STG ttungc-Townch;p-Scccion: 45•25-17
Site Address: N APPLEWAYIMICHIGAN/E BARKER/S IRR CANAL PARCBI,(S): (first 20)
Applicant Name: DONWOOD INC-CURRY, GORDON Phone a: 509)928-0600 53173.0511
Applicant Address: 502 N GLENN RD Phone 214+ 509)245-3322
SPOKANE. W A 992U6
Datc Conditions Mailed:
~1 L_~ - I I
Flood Zone: Na Water 5ource: 4 5ewcr Source: S Scha71 Dist: 356 Fire Dist: 1 P'hone Dist:
Billing Name: Owner: DONWOOD [NC Engineer: M(CNAFL C PNILI.IP5
Address: Owncr Adtircss: 502 Iv GLENN RD Company: SIMPSON E.NUINEFRS UVC
SPOKANE. RfA 99205 Addcess: 909 AI ARGONNE R.D
SPOKANE WA 4(P12
Phone: CJwner Pfiona: 509)92841dc10 Phone: (SUy) 926-1322
Fux:
Signr.d Name
Building # 456-3675 ! Planning # 456-2245 Contact: FRANCINE SHAW
Date Submilted Description Initinls
~ ■ ~ w ~
05i2U! 1997 pA'TL TECHI+tICALLY COMPLETE
DATE NOT TECHIVICAGLY COMPLETE
DATE PAY HEFS RECEIVED
DATE PRIORTI'Y FEES RECEIVEll COPY TO ACCOLINTING
FINAL PLAT FEFS COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING
~ I NOTICL TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLE'TED - OR NCEU5 TO BE SIGNED
fn-Out #I in•Out C ln-OtiK #3
DESIGN UEVIATION DATFS IIV-UUT
In-Out N4 In-Out #S tn Uut p'ti
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE I'I'EM CALCULA'TED
DATE BOND RECEIVFD BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATH F3()`D RELEASE - DA7"E ROND REDUCL-D aUNU BALANCE
}irating Date Deciston Approved Deaia! Contitaied Appealed ACC Appmvcd Denled
.Appealed ta CnuR Appruveci Detued Cutuirwrci Final Project Stants
I I STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMII' TECI-iNIC1AN (SYL)
i / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
, .
- ~
~ *
~~:l~c,Ld ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
Dacc Fiied
Date As IIuitt Plan.4 Rrcaived
Date Rpad Pians appmved xEzorrE FrLE # ZE-0027-97 -97
Ncv; Roaci Standarcls 5-1S-9S Mvtar
Campanion F!e
Hraring Date: UHi()b/ i997 H Timc:: O! :3U H Nuiriber: 3 Relatcd File
DESIGN Revicw Dace: 03/20/1997 DR Time: 01:15 Building I)ept
Revicw Date: R Time: R Number: DESIGN REVIENY N DR"LE-262-97
Date Received: 03/I0/1997 Rrview Type;: Large Lot i Bldg. Syuurc Frxt:
Na. i.ats: No. Acrrs: 4
Project Name: «-3•$ TO I-2 SALFS OFFICE STG Rangr-Townst,ip-SCCtiaa: 45-25-17
Site Address: N APPLEWAYIMICHIGAN/E BARKCR/S IRR CANAL PARCEI.(S): (first 20)
ApPlicant Name: DONWOOD INC-CLJRRY, GORDON Phoae 509)928-0600 $5173-0511
Appiicant Address: 502 N GLENN RD Phacie 2# 509)245-3322
SPnK:'1NE. WA 99206
Date Cotxiition.a Mailecl:
Flocxi Zane: Nu Water Sourcc: 4 Sewer Source: 5 Schcol Dist: 356 Fire Dist: 1 Phnnc Dist:
Billing Namc: Owner: DONWDOD ITiC Engineer: MICHAEL C PHtLLIPS
Address: Owner Addrm, s: SUZ H GLENN RD Compaay: SIMP50N ENGtNEERS [NC
5POKANE. W A91205 Aadress: 909 N ARGONNE RD
SPOKANE WA 99212
Pttortie: Owner Phone: 509)928-0600 Phone: (509) 926r 1322
Fnx:
Signed Name
Building k 456-3675 ! Planning # 456-2205 Contact: FRANCTNE SHAW
Date 5ubmltted Descriptian InitiaLs ~
DATE TECHN(CALLY COMPLETE
DATE 1VOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
vATC PAY FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORI'I'Y FEES RECETVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FCC,S COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCUUNTING
NOTICC TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 13 4 6 COMPLET'ED • OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
tn-r1uc #1 tn-ouc r- In-o,.►c #3
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT
In Chl pa (n ULt #5 Irc-(;m #b
B01YD QUAIVTITIES I=OR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATE flOND RECF.[VED BOND AMOIFNT RECFIVED
DATE BOND RI:I.EASI: - DATE BUND RL-DUCL:D Ei()ND BALANCE
Hraring Dau Urcisum Apptovcd Dcnicd Cutuinutd Appeuteci BCC Approved Deniai
:lppealed ta Cewrc Appt'oved Denioci Cdntinusxi Final Projeet Seatus
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL)
, ' STAMPED 208 I.OT ALANS T4 SECRETARY (SANDY)
• :s
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rti r;
In the Matter Concerning ZE-27-97; Zone Reclassification ) JuL 3
from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to,Light Industrial ) NOTICE OF
(I-2) ) PUBLIC HEARING _
)
Applicant: Donwood, Inc. c/o Gordon Curry ) -
TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of proposal, as listed
on Spokane County Assessor's records.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ABOVE-
REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW:
Hearing Date: August 6, 1997 Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (t7R-3.5) to Light Industrial (I-2) for those
uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
Applicant/Owner: Donwood, Inc.
c/o Gordon Curry
502 N. Glenn Road
Spokane, WA. 99206 -
(509) 923-0600
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Appleway Avenue approximately 1/3 mile east of -
the intersection of Appleway Avenue and Barker Road in the SW '/4 of Section 17, Township 25 >1.2
Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5).
Comprehensive Plan: Urban.
Environmental Determination (SEPA): A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issued. The
Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency. The official comment period ends August 4, 1997.
Related Permits Not Included in Application: None.
Division of Builciing & Planning Staff Person: Francine Shaw; Senior Planner (509) 456-3675
.
i
,a
+l.
Y
~
- vicioity.Nlap
/ • . l, / f~ ~ • r'~ .1 + ~ • ~ ~ ~
t^'
~
r - ~
70 2c,
•j o . a~" • 4~ ~ ~ aa 1-
~ ' ~ ~ o ~ ~ I a• .
ma
x~•rQ o i a
~ . ~
~ 115 ~fC'S
~ri ~ •n .Ta ~W£'L%' ~v ~a`t1 to'7,
• ~
d4r T - - o o
~o
r ry A ~ ~ •
' a ~.v ` ; , ~ •
~ :
NtIN i '
t
~M 1=- ~ i~~r• ppq►+£
rn f~L~ ~
~ ~ ~ v ~
~ ~ C.'~Q S=--v
. •
90
'•'f K v v~ r~ ~•,v;;;•'••.
•EA-ST1.7E H46rM~1 ri .
,
1 J sk ~
~ --n-- ` r ~ ,j r
~ • .
~
.
:
,y ° ~
. ~ ~ OFiI ~ ~„rC ~
- s Spa n.G V~ f~ps: ri~- r.►r
~r
0
a ~ ~ ~ ;w t
.~~f' ~ e3 ` tsT •
tt~ ~ t wO Q .vc G, ,
i ~
~r , ~R~r~
~ ~ . ~ ~ t
~
e , YM ' Paae 1
_
Staff ReP°rt for ZE~7-97
E
g_g_g7 H
ts ~
ZE-27-97
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
. ~
.
b
. T . SAI m N
N ~
CL1D ,I EU CL
J o Austinr
~ E Well o
SP
~ . . ~ ~
. , ~
Liberty L
MISS I a N r Gre nacre
r l
N
3 ¢
r.-
.
• • /1~+ , ~~f~~T~• ~.1:
11 c'~ , }
. , •
~ 4-M
~ft ~
8 T
Hill
LU ~
~
• . . . ~ . n .
. . . :
. . .
. ~ . . : 30
. . ; . „ .
_ . .
f. . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
~ - " ~ • ~ - ~ ~ ~ v~
~ • ~p~,~...~.~ ~ . . ~
• ~ : ti' ' : Y 9 C~
~ . : . ~ ~ ~ N .
. 1 .•~1~•;• • / , le' ~ ~
~
` • ' . . •
~ -
~ ~ - .
. .3
• • r t . 1 • ~ . ~ cit ~
x
• ~'t 1~1~1ic-~.. ~ ~ ~ /
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 2
,
ZE-27-97
Existing Zoning
.
:
7'i82- 183''~184'~'' ~ia !~g-= ~0;''•'i°'I:.° ~i 52 ~ 33 ~~194 ~ 195 ' t~ 197 198 199 200 24M
.
MAXVYELL ANV ~ . . Sc ,oo - W s •Q W B.N.R R_
f E~I+sm t ~ UR o :7
(ar:a .
3.5 3.5<
U
7. . ~ V. . ,
• . . _ N~
r W N ~ . , ' ~ • • . OONE
4 C';MET 14 ~ ' . ~ ~ . .
_.~CA. TALDO • ~ -
' 9Q , • i. ~ , , . _ ~ ~ ~ . .
. . . R_ .t,~ ; ; . ~ • - F~REEwnY..
B-3
CN►c ,
. ! 3.5 " Ua' ~ • • .
- ; ~ . ~ - _ • 'n. , ~ P0
. 'i: . L.:L M ' ' r ' ~M~~ ' •
. r'. • ' ~ ' , • , . . ~
~ . 40-' - Eb WI.V ~ •
t . . - . • .
. .1 I►vf ~ , .
: , • L • ~ A~ Y ~ a O . •
c 'UR L2 ~+O ~"~7 MAIN ' •
~ • ` .i~ J ...~;4 . . , _ .
~ TR I
~ . . . .0 SPRAGUE AvE •
~ . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ - p
1ST ' ' • ~ ' ' ~ ~
, . . . . . ~ S-TA~3
o • • - ~ ~ o Av E . .
~ . . . ~ . . ,
' r ' /V ~ , • " • A• • • G~ NIC41~t•N j>1~ ,
IL. . : • y` . . ..-~y
.!L' . ~ ' • FOURTN AVE • .1 . p` j
~ ~ ' ~ . • . - . r"'. ."~--'.~'t•'~' r . . • ' /
wn.►~ e,/,~•
- . . , • SRo
s • ' ~ ~ • - , ~~r ~ . • n,+rcAVIEw Q
' - . ! ' . . ` " ' . . i•`I~ o Q
' . ' • . ~ ' ' ' . . ~ ~ . _ . .
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 3
~i ~S~•rtv~+Z~ . ~ 4~A :T' .,~J~ 1w•
Yl ti:'• • • ' '
~ ~1~~~~ ~ a ~
ii''~ - ± ' ~•r1 l` i i:24
~ ..•l~h ~ r~ e~i~ s ~
t ~ "y ~ `i ~t~ ~ ~ ' y {y} ~ ~ ~ ~
~j w- '~~y~„y~~j , i• t~ ~x C~',;~ 't ~ ~
t ..'f~S~ ~ • .~••i,- " ; ~i% ~ ~ D,~ .i ~ ~ ~
~►,1 j ~ 1~ .t~ i . ~ ~ ` ■ ~
r 441 ' ` f• • `
, i
; l ~ ~ ~ y~+~ ~ ~ a ` . • Iti ti . ■
( :1 ~ ~ ` jVy ~ i1•~~w',N : . . i ~ ~
~ ~~Y +4` ` Y~t"+;: '"j,~~.'~;~• ~
5 ~ ~e t ~1"+;• ' ~ ~;i'~~ +ri.,~"~~~ • ~ ~ ~
AO~''
' ~ r .r~ 'e'A K~' •~i' ~ ~ ~ ~
i~,~ i `4 't ` ~ ~x . ~ M~'
~.~~1•.~~~ ~!!,4, '.x ~
h d r r p~ ~4a
~S ~ t•. r
.
Z °
,
, ~ ` ~ ~ ~
t t /1
,
. '
ZE-27-97
Site Development Plan
S~ : P1•~ `
~ ; , S~E~ e ~t'
v,~,N.. co...., c...,Y N ~ •
r~•` ' (~~,Y•:~ : .__1
• yG A, . , 0 , ~ , ~ . . .1 ~ )►r ~
~ y J~ t~'~ +C ~ 1• , ~ ~ ~ ' , 1/%1 p _jj~
~ _ _ _ t:--~~ 0• - s ~ `J J~
- : ,r• - ..C~
• ~ . . ~t..~ c,~~-. ~ ~ %~5 I Q t« 1letRty t
' T~.~ • ~~•,q~;;;A d
. . ~ fo
~ :•~~o ~ , G ~ ' LL
. ~ d 1f~~ .
N ~ . .y-• ~'f ~ • -
. ~ • L6 •
UpfOe delope o i
.
. o ~ .
~ i. . ?
~ . .
a
M I M ~
• ._Q_?Y_ =~~------r ~ C1NDEdtloOfO . „
✓ 1 a'
F~JGG L~~Y~
I ~ ~ •
i~
_ ~ 7S Ac.e e.s .
. A.. f-~~• ~ r
AN ..1~~•~ P ~~v~Y ~
. ~
` ..►aA - t4°I~
J ~~t•'' ~ B..i~o~J+11 G,...,,t..~.► T.
~ , ' f ~ ~ N...:,,,f • ~ r. w. • e
N << ~i
= ' ~I
M~•'~ ~ ~I .
i ~i
.~r
Exipina Zooa Proqoscd Zonc Aa+ca '
~ 7S
UR-).3 1-2
'L of buildiot mMCnso -Cac 9 4:4 •3102 sq' Lot 9 O% la 10 I
Buifdlog Ute $alo oQite Stonge- ~
l3rKtscmpe a.csi 1'60 AT' 7-1--f eF fu1..e. CLj.ryv,T r~-• C••,•:►.....f
/ af Paricini Spo= E pcr sitc plaa - Lot 9
Y. --pn SP.M %S: Sot 9 All of lot 10
Huil.line Scsbadj W-?-Z R E- I00 R N3s n S- 700 d I
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 5
i SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex;.AMINER
FROM: DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 6, 1997
SUBJECT: ZE-27-97, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN
RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-2)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Donwood, Inc.
c/o Gordon Curry
502 North Glenn Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
(509) 928-0600
Contact Planner: Francine Shaw
Parcel Number: 55173.0511
Site Address: 19223 East Appleway Avenue.
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Appleway Avenue,
approximately 1/3 mile east of the intersection of Appleway Avenue and Barker
Road in the SW '/4 of in Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: Zone reclassification of approximately 4.75 acres from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light Industrial(I-2) for recreational vehicle and boat
sales, storage, repair and those uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
Date of Issuance of Counter Complete Status: March 3, 1997
Date of Issuance of Determination of Completeness: May 19, 1997
Hearing Examiner Decision Deadline (120 day time frame): September 17, 1997
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 6
i •
Staff Recommendation: Denial
II. SITE TNFORMATION
A. Site Size: Approximately 4.75 acres.
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan: The subject property is located within the Urban
category of the Comprehensive plan, the Priority Sewer Service Area
(PSSA) and the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA). The Urban
category is primarily a residential category of single family, two-
family, multiple family and condominium buildings along with
neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and recreational
facilities. The more intensive land uses such as light industrial and
neighborhood commercial will be located near heavily traveled streets
while the least intensive single-family residential uses will be isolated
from noise and heavy traffic. Light industrial and neighborhood
commercial land uses are typically implemented by the Light
Industrial (I-2) and Neighborhood Commercial (B-1) zones of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, respectively.
The overall text of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan does
not address or support light industrial land uses nor does the text
identify specific Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines that
encourage light industrial uses within the Urban category. Most Urban
. category policies apply to residential development with the most
intensive policies addressing multifamily residential development.
The proposed zone reclassification may be subject to the "transition
area" definition of the Comprehensive Plan. A"transition area" is the
area of land located along the boundary between the two land use
categories. The subject property is located within the Urban category
and west of and adjacent to the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan that
the established boundaries between land use categories are accurate
and definable on the ground, but it is also recognized that a specific
proposal may be located adjacent to these boundaries. In these
instances, depending on the impact to existing land use categories and
the distance a use intrudes into an adjacent category, a Comprehensive
Plan amendment may not be required in order to allow a land use that
is not consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of
the land use category in which a property is located but rather that land
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 7
J .
,
use categarv that is located adjacent ta a proposal. The "transitian
area" can allow develapments complying with either of the Land-Use
- rnap categories depending upon the Hearing Examiner's apprvval of
the specific prapased site develapment.
The proposa1 does demonstrates consistency with the detailed
definition of the ZJrbari category of the Comprehensive Plan due to the -
lacation of the sifie adjacent tQ Appieway Avenue. Appleway Avenue
is high traffic flow carridor and the Spokane County Arterial Road
Flan designates Appleway Avenue as a Pnncipal Artenal.
The proposed zvne reclassification for the purpose of allow'm'g
recreatianal vehicle and boat sales may be consistent with the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the U'rban category of the
Comprehensive Plan if buffering, landscaping and other appropriate
rneasures needed to ensure cornpatibility with the surrounding
neighborhood are included as site improvernents for the proposed
development of the subject site. However, th,e request for azone
reCl3SsifiCatlQii from Urbat]. ReS1de[]#ial-3.5 (LTR-3.5) ta Light
Yndustrial (1-2) for the purpose of developing the sFte for those commercial land use ac#ivities permitted within the Light Industrial (1-
2) zone anly by reference to the Regianal Business (B-3) zone matrix,
Section 14.623 of the Spakane County Zoning Code, does not rnake
the propvsed use more campati6le with the Urban categary of the
Cornprehensive Plan. Section D of -the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan, Non-compatible Uses, specificall-y identiies
rnining, major commercial users, heavy industrial uses and intensive
farming as land uses that would not be campatible with Urban areas.
Further more, Section 14.628.100 of the Spokane County Zaning C4de
indic.ates the purpase and intent ofthe Regional Business (B-3) zone is
ta implement the Major Carnmercial category of the Camgrehensive
P1aTi, not the Urban category in which #he subject prvperty is located.
Utilizing the Light Indu.strial (I-2) zone to establish the abili#y #o
develop prvperty for those uses typically associated with Regional
Business (B-3) zone and as a1lowed by Section 14.629.020 ofthe
Zoning Code is not consistent with fihe Goals, Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Urhan category of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Arterral Rvad Plan: The proposal is located north of and adjacent to
Appleway Avenue. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies
Appleway Avenue as a Principal Ar-terrial with a plaruled right-of-way
width o-f 100 fee#. The existing right-of-way (ROW) width of Appleway
Avenue is approximately 170 feet which exceeds the 100 faat glarned
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 8
Y; *
right-af-way width. The Spakane Coun#y Division of Engineering and
Roads is not requesting the dedication of additional right-of-waY (ROW)
or land tv be reserved a.s- Future Acquisition Area (FAA) alo~g Appleway
Auenue, However, the Division ofEngineering and Roads has requested
that a centeg tum lane be installed along Appleway Avenue at the time
development of the site becomes intensive. The turn lane will require the
addition of approximately 14 ta 16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
developrnent.
In additian, the Division of Engineering and Roads has requested the
applicant #v dedicate 30 feet afadditzonal right-of-way from the centerline
from Hodges Road for the extension of Hodges Road and the applicable
tuming radi-us for Hodges Road and Sprague Avenue.
3. County Parl-s Plan: The Spvkane Cou.nty Parks and Recreation Plan
_ identifies Meadvwwaod Galf C+ourse as the County park facility lacated ~
nearest to the proposal. Meadawwood Golf Gaurse is Iocated
approximately 3 mites east ofthe paraposal.
C. Si#e Characteristics: The subject property is triangular in shape aad relatively
flat in tvpography. The site is currently occupied by a non-conforming
recreational vehicle and boat sales off ce, associated storage yaxd and repair
shop on the westerly portion of the site. The parking/storage axea on site is
unpaved but is provided with night lighting. IVo landscaping is present on site.
The outdoor storage area is currently surrounded by a seven (7) foot cyclone
fence with three (3) strands of barbed wire located along the upper ~l~ of the
fence. An additional six (6) ~oot high sigh# obscuEring, board-on-boarrd fence is
Iocated along the west property line of the si#e. The rer,naining site a.rea is
vacant arYd wndeveloped and covered in native grasses with a few Panderasa
Pines scattered throughaut the undeveloped ,portion of the site. Overhead
transrrxission Iine border the subject property along the south property line
adjacent to Appleway Avenue.
D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The surrounding neighborhood encompasses
various land uses ranging frorri cvnimercial and industrial businesses along the
A,ppleway Avenue corridor to single family residential develapment extending
bath north and south beyond the corridor, (Jverhead trarismissivn lines provide
e]ectrical service to the neighbarhoad, iVlost roads providing access to
properties within the neighborhaod are gaved but wi#hvut curb or sidevvalk.
E. Zoning Analysis: The pu.rpose of the Light Yndustrial (1-2) zone is to rneet the
needs for industrial Iand as identified in the Industna.l catego,ry of the
Comprehensive P1an. Industrial uses in this zone wi1t include processing,
5-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 9
. ;
, fabrication, light assembly, freight handling and similar operations, all of a non-
offensive nature. It is the intent of the Light Industrial (I-2) zone to allow for
these uses by making them compatible with surrounding uses. General
characteristics of these areas include paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer
and water, a full line of public services including manned fire protection and
public transit accessibility.
When implementing the development standards identified in the Spokane
County Zoning Code for this proposal, the type of land use activity that will
occur on site will determine which development standards that apply to the
subj ect property. Those uses specifically identified as permitted uses within the
Light Industrial (I-2) zone matrix identified in Chapter 14. 629 of the Zone
Code, shall comply with the development standards of Chapter 14.632 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, Light Industrial (I-2) zone. Proposed uses
within the Light Industrial (I-2) zone that are allowed by reference to the
Regional Business (B-3) zone matrix, Chapter 14.623, and not specifically
identified as allowable uses within the Light Industrial (I-2) zone matrix, shall
comply with the development standards identified in Chapter 14.628 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, the Regional Business (B-3) Zone. In event a
conflict occurs between allowable uses and applicable development standard,
the most restrict development standard shall apply to the development of the
site.
Zoning designations within the vicinity of the proposal range from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), which is primarily a medium density single family
residential zone, to the Regional Business (B-3) zone which is the most
intensive commercial zone in Spokane County. Most zone reclassifications in
the area occurred between the mid 1970's through the mid 1980's and were
primarily for the development of land for those uses allowed in the Regional
Business (B-3) zone.
Site: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991 consistent with
the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code,
previously established as Agricultural (A) in 1958 (ZE-376-58).
North: Regional Business (B-3) established in 1991 consistent with the
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code, previously
established as Freeway Commercial (FC) in 1976 (ZE-139A-76C).
South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991 consistent with
the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code,
previously established as Agricultural (A) in 1958 (ZE-376-58).
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 10
East: Light Industrial (I-2) established in 1991 consistent with the Program
to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code, previously
established as Agricultural (A) in 1958 (ZE-376-58).
West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991 consistent with
the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code,
previously established as Agricultural (A) in 1958 (ZE-376-58).
F. Land Use Analysis: The existing land use of the subject site is non-conforming
and requires the approval of this zone reclassification request to continue to
exist on the site.
Land use existing in the neighborhood of the subject site includes single family
residences mixed together with commercial and industrial businesses. The
subject site is located north of and adjacent to the Appleway Avenue corridor
which is bordered on the north side primarily by commercial businesses
extending north and beyond the corridor whereas the south side is bordered
primarily with single family residential development with a few small business
intermingled among the residences.
Site: Non-conforming recreational vehicle and boat sales, storage,
repair/service shop, vacant and undeveloped.
North: Vacant and undeveloped.
South: Railroad right-of-way and single family residences.
East: Agriculture, vacant and undeveloped.
West: Fire station, single family residence, vacant and undeveloped.
G. Circulation: Access to the site will be provided directly from Appleway
Avenue to the south of the subject property. The Spokane County Division of
Building and Planning and Division of Engineering will request a parking and
traffic circulation plan be submitted for review and approval prior to the
issuance of any certificate of occupancy or building permit. All parking,
outdoor storage and display areas as well as travel lanes are required to be
paved as per Section 14.802.080 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. The
applicant did submitted a request for a paving waiver to the Division of
, Building and Planning on July 29, 1997 pursuant to Section 14.802.080. The
paving waiver request is currently under review by the Spokane County Air
Pollution Control Authority and the Division of Engineering and a decision is
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 11
~ j
pending. The decision of approval/denial of the paving waiver request will be
made by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee upon
recommendations by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
(SCAPCA) and the Spokane County Engineer's Office when it can be
demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or other
technology, will not adversely affect air quality, water quality or the integrity
of the parking area.
H. Design: The site development plan illustrates an existing sales office, storage
garage (which is currently being used as a service and repair shop for
recreational vehicles and boats) and separate outdoor display and storage areas.
The storage area is planned for future development.
Development as illustrated on the site development plan is existing. No specific
plan for development of the remaining portion of the site has been proposed by
the applicant. Applicable Zoning Code development standards for future
development of the site depends upon proposed uses. Development of the site
for those uses specifically identified within Chapter 14.629 of the Spokane
County Zoning Code, Industrial Zones Matrix, as uses allowed in the Light
Industrial uses shall comply with the Light Industrial (I-2) zone development
standards indicated in Chapter 14.632 of the Zoning Code. For those uses that
are allowed within the proposed Light Industrial (I-2) zone by reference to the .
Regional Business (B-3) zone use matrix, Chapter 14.623, shall comply with the
Regional Business (B-3) zone development standards indicated in Chapter
14.628 of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
The site development plan does not provide enough information to determine
compliance with the Light Industrial (I-2) or the Regional Business (B-3) zone
development standards. However, due to lot size and the locarion of existing
structures, the site can accommodate any and all site improvements that may be
required by the Spokane County Zoning Code and conditions of approval for
this zone reclassification (if approved).
1. Site Plan Data
Proposed Site Plan:
Use: Non-conforming recreational vehicle and boats sale, storage and
service.
Proposed/Existing Buildings: Recreational vehicle sales office and
service shop.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 12
t Building(s) Footprint Area: A total of 3102 square feet of building
footprint area exists on site. The total includes a 990 square foot one story
sales office and 2122 squaze foot, one story service and repair shop.
Site Coverage: Approximately four percent (4%).
Maximum Structure Height: 23 feet maximum building height existing.
Total Floor Area: 3102 square feet existing.
Building Setbacks: Existing Re4uired
Front yard (Appleway Avenue) 35 feet from the 35 feet from the
property line property line
Flanking yard (Hodges Road) no development 35 feet from the
proposed within property line or 65
the vicinity of feet from
Hodges Road centerline
Side yard (west) 22 feet varies from 5 feet
per story to 15
feet depending
upon proposed use
Rear yard (north) 300± feet varies from 5 feet
per story to 15
feet depending
upon proposed use
Parking: Off-street parking requirements cannot be determined for the
subject site. No specific floor plans or figures have been provided
indicating area of outdoor display area, storage areas or repair/service area
by which to apply the appropriate parking ratios indicted within Section
14.802.040 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. However, the subject
site appears to be large enough to accommodate off-street parking that
may be required. Specific parking requirements shall be determined and
reviewed for compliance at the time a building permitlcertificate of
occupancy is requested for the subject site. All parking areas, outdoor
storage areas and internal travel lanes shall be paved in accordance with
Section 14.802.080 of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 13
!
Proposed Buffering/Landscaping Techniques: Landscaping is required
for the existing non-conforming use to comply with Chapter 14.806 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code. Landscaping required for the subject site
includes a five (5)-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping to be located
adjacent to the property line fronting Appleway Avenue, a 20 foot-wide
strip of Type I landscaping strip to be located adjacent to the west property
line where the adjacent zoning designation is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) and a 10 foot-wide strip of Type I landscaping to be located along the
north property line of the site where the adjacent zoning designation is
Regional Business (B-3). All landscaping shall be provided within the
boundaries of the subject site. Parking lot landscaping will be required if
it is determined that 20 or more off-street parking stalls are required for
the site and shall be provided in accordance with Section14.802.220 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code.
Additional buffering is required for outdoor storage areas as per Sections
14.628.355 and 14.632.355 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Outdoor
storage areas are required to be within an entirely closed building or
screened from view by a sight-obscuring non-pierced fence not less than
six (6) feet in height as per Section 14.632.355 of the Spokane County
Zoning Code. Currently, the outdoor storage area existing on site is
enclosed by an seven foot tall cyclone fence but is not sight obscuring.
The above noted requirement shall be complied with prior to the issuance
of any certificate of occupancy or building permit for the subject site.
Other Site Plan Considerations: The site plan submitted for review by
the Hearing Examiner is general in nature. Detailed review to determine
compliance with all Ordinance regulations and conditions of approval is
recommended to be administrative and to occur at the certificate of
occupancy or Building Permit stage.
1. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and
approved by the Spokane County Division of Engineer and Division of Utilities
prior to development andlor release of any building permit or certificate of
occupancy.
J. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: The site development
plan illustrates a sewer easement which runs north/south within the boundaries
of the subject site but does not indicate the width of the sewer easement. The
applicant has identified that this easement is approximately 20 feet in width. No
construction activity can occur within the boundaries of the sewer easement.
Site development plans submitted for future development of the subject site
shall illustrate the full width of the sewer easement in order for the Division of
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 14
. Building and Planning to determine the extent of construction limitations on site
and within the sewer easement.
K. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation District.
Consolidated Imgation District has indicated that it can supply domestic use
water for the project upon completion of agreements with the applicant. Water
supply will be provided from a public water system in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. The use of
private wells or water systems is prohibited.
L. Sewage Disposal: A public sewer system is required for the development of the
subject site, as authorized by the Spokane County Director of Utilities. A wet
(live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be
constructed. A sewer connection permit is required. Sewer plans and
specifications for public sewer connections and facilities along with payments
for applicable sewer charges shall be submitted for review and approval prior to
the issuance of the sewer connection permit.
M. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. Central
Valley School District was contacted regarding this proposal and no comments
were received.
N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District
has indicated they have no objection to the proposed zone reclassification
request and they have no comments regarding the proposed site development
plan. The Fire District and the Division of Building and Planning (Fire
Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to issuance of
any certificate of occupancy or building permit.
0. Cultural Resources: None have been identified.
P. Public Transit: The subject property is located within the Public Transit
Benefit Area and is served by Spokane Transit Authority (STA) route 19.
Q. Critical Areas: None have been identified.
R. Public Comment: Four (4) letters of opposition from property owners located
within the vicinity of the subject property have been received by the Division of
Building and Planning. Issues of concern include the proposal's disruption of
the existing residential nature of the surrounding neighborhood, increased
pollution, traffic, dust, noise and crime.
5-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 15
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the applicant and was reviewed by
the County Division of Building and Planning. The review considered the specifics
of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations
and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized
Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Division of
Building and Planning has determined that "No probable significant adverse
impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a
Determination of Non-significance ("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 15 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/divisions affected by the future development for review and comment.
The "DNS" comment period ended August 4, 1997 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The
Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the
public hearing.
IV. DIVISION UF BUILDING AND PLANNING SUMMARY
The proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5) to Light
Industrial (I-2) for the purpose of recreational vehicle and boat sales, storage, repair,
and those uses allowed within the Light Industrial (I-2) zone is generally inconsistent
with Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the of Urban category however,
may be subject to the "transition area" definition of the Comprehensive Plan as
determined by the Hearing Examiner. The proposal is not consistent with the existing
residential development located within the vicinity of the proposal. Although the site
development plan does not demonstrate full compliance with the development
standards of the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, the size of the subject property and
location of eYisting development is such that the development standards for both the
Light Industrial (I-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zone can be satisfied. The
Division of Building and Planning is recommending denial.
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the
"Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the
property, heirs, assigns and successors.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 16
. ii. The zone reclassification applies to the following real property:
Lots 9 and 10 in Block 4 of CORBIN ADDITION TO GREENACRES, as per
plat thereof recorded in volume "S" of Plats, page 30:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 88 feet of Lot 9, Block 4;
EXCEPT any portion lying within the following described tract: Beginning at
the point of the intersection of the West line of said Lot 9 with the north line
of the Primary State Road No. 2, Vera to Liberty Lake Junction, as now
established; thence Northeasterly along the North line of said right of way to a
point which is 100 feet East of the West line of said Lot 9 measured at right
angles thereto; thence running North and parallel with the West line of said
Lot 9, a distance of 125 feet; thence West 100 feet to its intersection with the
West line of said Lot; thence South along said West line to the point of
beginning;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the abandoned Greenacres Irrigation Canal
lying northerly of and adjacent to the property herein described:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the herein described property
lying within any roads, streets or highways;
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, as amended.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the
Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted
including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations
set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval is required by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning
/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to
the release of any building permits.
4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fiYture shall not extend over the
property boundary.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 17
r 5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall
be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project
prior to release of building permits or certificate of occupancy. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured
or impaired.
6. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a
variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action.
This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval
affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the
same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in
part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as
Lots 9 and 10 in Block 4 of CORBIN ADDITION TO GREENACRES, as per
plat thereof recorded in volume "S" of Plats, page 30:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 88 feet of Lot 9, Block 4;
EXCEPT any portion lying within the following described tract: Beginning at
the point of the intersection of the West line of said Lot 9 with the north line of
the Primary State Road No. 2, Vera to Liberty Lake Junction, as now
established; thence Northeasterly along the North line of said rigbt of way to a
point which is 100 feet East of the West line of said Lot 9 measured at right
angles thereto; thence running North and parallel with the West line of said Lot
9, a distance of 125 feet; thence West 100 feet to its intersection with the West
line of said Lot; thence South along said West line to the point of beginning;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of tbe abandoned Greenacres Irrigation Canal
lying northerly of and adjacent to the property herein described:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the herein described property lying
within any roads, streets or highways;
is the subject of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner
on August 6, 1997 imposing a variety of special development conditions. File
No. ZE-27-987 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane
Division of Building and Planning.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 18
► 7. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County
Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final
disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall
generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the
property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with
the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is
more particularly described as follows: . . . "
Lots 9 and 10 in Block 4 of CORBIN ADDITION TO GREENACRES, as per
plat thereof recorded in volume "S" of Plats, page 30:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 88 feet of Lot 9, Block 4;
EXCEPT any portion lying within the following described tract: Beginning at
the point of the intersection of the West line of said Lot 9 with the north line of
the Primary State Road No. 2, Vera to Liberty Lake Junction, as now
established; thence Northeasterly along the North line of said right of way to a
point which is 100 feet East of the West line of said Lot 9 measured at right
angles thereto; thence running North and parallel with the West line of said Lot
9, a distaace of 125 feet; thence West 100 feet to its intersection with the West
line of said Lot; thence South along said West line to the point of beginning;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the abandoned Greenacres Irrigation Canal
lying northerly of and adjacent to the property herein described:
EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the herein described property lying
within any roads, streets or highways;
Attached are recommended conditions of approval from the following reviewing
agencies:
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority dated July 22, 1997
Spokane Regional Health District dated May 19, 1997
Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads dated July 22, 1997
Spokane County Division of Engineering/Development Services dated July 11, 1997
Spokane County Division of Utilities dated July 28, 1997
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 19
; 5094596828 APCA 574 P05i08 JUL 22 '97 08:56
Y . . 'SPOKANE CGUNTY
.
AIR POtlUrl~)N
B o o K,~ N E CON7ROt AUTHOR(fY
WFS7 1101 COLLEGE, SUIT 5 OK , WA 99201 •(509) 456~i127 Fax (509) 459-6828
Date: T--- 4 .
~
To: C] r. Jeff Forry
r. John Pederson -
Spokane County Division of Buildings & Planning
1026 W. B r o adway Ave.
Spokane,ldVA 99260 .
From: Mr. Charles E. 13tuder
Re: SCAPCA REQLIIREMENTS FOR: .
File No. ~~•~~-7'_[~
ProPonentlPro,iect Name: ND C
D jRequest for C'omments on
❑iComments on Hearinqs Examiner Pubiic Meetinq on )
VfComments or► Oetermination of Nonsiqnificance lssued on~~ }
❑ (Pre•Appltcatir,►n/Development Conference on ~
The Spokene County Alr PclJution Contn,l Authority (SCAPCA) wss formed under the euthority of the 1967 Cleen Rir Aci of Wasnington
(RCM, That Act required counlies, uke Spokene County, to eclivafe /ocal alr po!luiion control egencies. To meef tte requiremenfs of
fhet Act, SCAPCA adopted rogulalions ro conlro/ (he em/ssions ot aii contemrnents trom sourcas within Spokene Covnty.
Portions o! Spokene Caunty feil to meet tederal heelth slenderds !or perticu/ate emisslons (dusl end smoke) and carbon monoxida.
Numeious sireteg(es have been implenienled to reducs air pollut;on emissions so thet we can Irrprove air quality end meet hea/lh
siendeids. .
Following is g lisl ol cencems/,ssues theiy st e minimum, nesd te be eddressed for proposed pro/ects. Addiilcnel eommenls may resu/r
e}ter mora defeiled informetion of the pro)sct is supplied. SCAPCA encoureges propenenls fo conlecf their ofrices at 1101 West College,
' Spokene, WA 99201 for eddi'tionel in/ormetion.
? The foliowirig condltlons are relewitnt io proposed project.
Harvesting of timber creafes s-Ifvlculturat debris. This dehris must be removed by methods other than burning
~ to ihe greatest extent posslble. !f burning is the only des(red dispasal method then it must be done in
~
~ accordance w;th all applicat-le regulations, and conducted in a manner that minimizes smoke related
; nulsances and a;r pollution impacis.
~ -
SCAPCA Regulation I, Anicl:a V requires that a Notice of Construcfion and Apptication for Approva} be
submitted io and approved by our Agency prior to tha constn,ctlon, instatlalion or establishment of an air
? polluiion source. It is possible that the foltowing air pollution sources may be present at the proposed
facility:
~ Q One or more tossil fuel (natural gas, propane, butane, diesel, fuel oii, or waste oii) or
wood burning haat sources. Naturaf gas/propane/butane burning boilers, heating
units, or hot waier heaters with a tutal heat input of 2,000,000 Btuslhr are required to
. ' appty for a Natir;e of Construction. Other units are required to apply for a NOC when
. j the total heat fnput ezceeds 400,000 8tus/hr. In addition, additional requirements such .
. ~ • EO GENE3iAt eCW1Fwmeee
I
:
. l
~
. ~ Print~d on Fcp•ekeF~yor .
' R-F-Q7 uF Ct-aFf Rannrt fnr 7F-77_q7
• D.,,,,. ~n
5094596828 APCA 574 P05j08 JUL 22 '97 08:56
. - . ,
as Low NOx burners -and source testing may be required depending upon the size of
the unit.
~ One or more Stand bi/ Generators. SCAPCA requires a Notice of Construction for all
Stand by Generators ihat are rated greater than or equal to 500 mechanical horsepower
(375 Kitowatts),
• There are numerous businesnes that are allowed in a commercial and industrial zoning that are air
pollution sources. Before an;l buslness is established at the site, SCAPCA should be contacted to
determine if a Notice of Consiruction is required. A COPY OF THfS LETTER SHOULD BE GIVEN TO
EACH NEW TENANT.
• All air pollution regulations musil be met.
• Air pol(ution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation
projects be controlied. ?his r;iay tequire the use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of
activity during cerfain weather c:onditions. Hau( roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer
of earthen mpterial must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities.
• SCAPCA strongly recommendi>, that all traveled surfaces (i.e, ingress, egress, patking areas, access
roads) should be paved and kept clean to minimize emissions.
• Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved sur{aces onto paved
surfaces. If Vacking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediatety to clean
these surtaces.
• SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV may require registration with this agency depending upon the type of
business that may be establish-ed at the site. An approved Notice of Construction suffices to meet fhis
requirement.
• SCAPCA Regulation I, Article a/l, and SCAPCA Regulaiion II, Article N, address air pollution emission
standards. All emission standat-ds must be met.
• Debris generated a's a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e.
consfruction waste, vegetative viraste etc.). •
• Demolition and renovation proje,:ts must comply with the requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M and
SCAPCA Regulation I, Atticle IX. Intent to Demolish forms are avaiiable at the SCAPCA office.
• Depending upon the type of bLLsiness or equipment established on site, some objectionab(e odors may
result from this project. SCAPCA's regulations state that effective con#rol apparatus and measures must
be used to reduce odors to a miriimum.
• AJI solid fue( buming devices (fi►•eplacas wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc must comply with local, state,
and federal rules and regulatiouis. Fireplace emission standards go into effect January 1, 1997. New
fireplaces must be tested and l.abeled in accordance with procedures and criteria specified in the U BC
Standard 31-2.
• If the proponent or anyone else has questions conceming the above, please contact Charles E. Studer
(509) 456-4727 ext. 107, April N,4iller ext. 105, or Kelle Vigeland ext. 106 at SCAPCA's office during the
hours of 8:00 am & 4;30 pm, Manday through Friday.
Failure to meet SCAPCA revLiilations may result in delaYs, closure and civil andlor eriminal
sancv'ons.
CL,EAN AIR IS UP TO ALL OF US
PACEz
8-6-97 EiE Staf f'Report f or ZE-27-97 Page 21
1•Sl-.j1CANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTR1,.I'
rlcvEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
SPQKANE COUNTY Inter-office Communication
aY 2 9 1497
DATE: Vlay 19, 1997
DWJSION OF EUILDING AND PLANNING
BY:
TO: Francine Shaw, Senior Planrier, Spokane County Building and Plannin Division
FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD ~
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change: ZE-27-97 (Donwood, Inc.)
.
1. References:
a) Map of subject by Applicant, undated, received by this office May 7, 1997.
b) Reconnaissance Geoloeic Map of the West Half of the Spokane QuadranQle. Washin2ton and Idaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survev. Sookane Countv. WashinQton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Spokane Countv. Washinaton. EnQineerinQ Intemretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e) Spokane Countv Rules and ReQulations for Sewaae Disposal Svstems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of water wells in Range 45E, Township 25N, Sections 8,16,17,18, and 20.
g) Map: Greenacres Quadrana-le, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The project is within Critical Water Supplv Service Area #3 and within the service area of
Consolidated Irri~ation District. Water supply ~vill be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewaQe disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to Countv Resolution 80.041 S adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not
of the proper dimensions to permit the use of both individual wells and sewage systems.
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area east of vlichigan Street and north of Applewav. Local
drainageways are insignificant.
0 C C17 rTT [•L_cL r% ___i C___ nT 11-7 n'1 r. nn
' .
e) Surface soils are classe~. oy the U.S. Soil Conservation Service "s Ganison gravelly loam with 0% to .
5% slopes. They have a septic tanlc filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible
contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate
to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shotivs they are
from 100' to 120' deep and have static water levels varying from 82' to 90' below the surface. The
Consolidated Irrigation District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent.
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
.
d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to
each lot. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: DONWOOD IiNC
C/O GORDON CURRY .
502 N GLEN RD
SPOKANE WA 99206
MICHAEL C PHILLIPS -
909 N ARGONNE RD
SPOKANE WA 99212
Ianduse.Itr\ZE-31-97(DONWOOD[INC)
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Pap-e 23
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO: Spokane County Planning Department
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: July 22, 1997
_ E fV E l7
PROJECT: DONWOOD INC.
~'r.A i~ c COJ ~VT`f
FILE ZE0027-97 /
Hearing : 08/06/97 @ 1: 30 # . il iI 2 1 1991
Review Date: 07/23/97 @ #
Sponsor/Applicant : GORDON CURRY FJ1 tVl05t0 iti 0 F 6~~!! G;G A -r.;D FLAN y;N G
Section Township Range: 17-25-45
Planner: FRANCINE SHAW
Design/Review Date: ( @ )
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Applicant shall dedicate the amount of right of way for a total of 30
feet from centerline for the extension of Hodges Road and the
applicable radius for Hodges Road and Sprague Avenue.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
~ obtained f rom the County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. Based upon the intensity of proposed uses the County Engineer may
° y require a center turn lane to be installed on Appleway which is
adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 14-16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development. An RID/CRP Agreement shall be executed for the
installation of curbing and sidewalk along the frontage of Appleway.
CC: Applicant GORDON CURRY
Enqineer/Surveyor MICHAEL C. PHILLIPS
R-Fi_07 LIF C1-nFF l?ornrt fnr 7F_77_07 D.,~r, 7A
Page 2 ` .
08/06/97 .
ZE0027-97
7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
8. The applicant shall construct paved and delineated approachs to meet
the existing pavement on Appleway.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of
Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby
request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described
property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the
formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s)
described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement
District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing
Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed
under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not
filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the
alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter
35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below,
said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree: (1) that the improvements
or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and
(2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by
the property included therein, together with the amount of any County
participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID,
and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently
developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and
successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090,
to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by
either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to
appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further,
it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment
estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased
true and f air value improvement ( s) add (s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane
County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the
owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 25
Page 3 ' 08/06/97
ZE0027-97 The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10)
years f rom the date of execution below. This provision is applicable
to Hodges Road and curb and sidewalk on Appleway.
11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
8-6-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-27-97 Page 26
,.4;' 1 q ei- .r . .-s xs• G4
S MQ - r' . !••'V^""'%"' - ,T Ygrr= : j N^ ^ ^ !~".'F''T'-.! :.v . y a • ~t . _ " . • . .c ' ' • . •
- .tiL.F-."~..Car, . W~ .w• SY. .M a. ..:r.l...i.<~:J...:: . _ i - _ . c
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Friday, July 11, 1997 10:57 AM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott
Subject: ZE-27-97 - Donwood, Inc.
7/11 /97
I received the above referenced project application on July 10, 1997. The SCS Soils Map
identifies this area as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to
be accurate. Therefore, since this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept
drainage plan is required. We have no information that says there are any critical areas on this
site.
I consider this proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using our standard drainage condition.
Ow s~eNUSU:c fa
: lV`L~
-SPOitAINE COUNTY
. .
OIVISiON GF EUILQ,PIG P,ND PLA;VNING
,:IY:
8-6-97 RF qtaff Rpnnrfi fnr 7F_77_07 n.,.,,, 7-7
►
,
To: FRANCINE SHAW, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Spokane County Utilities
Date: 7/28/97
Subject Conditions of Approval
Planning Action Number: ZE-0027-97 Type of Action: ZR Donwood; UR-3.5 to I-2
Applicant: Donwood, Inc. % Gordon Curry Legal Owner: Donwood, Inc. % Gordon Curry
502 N. Glenn Road 502 N. Gienn Road
Spokane WA 99206 Spokane WA 99206
Sewer Service:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer
connection permit is required.
This condition applies to any "new" use that is allowed within the proposed zonning.
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only
those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and
facilities for review and approval. I
SS12F The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit.
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer
connection permit.
Water Service: Consolidated
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
' Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
c;C_LC1VcD
;~I-JKANE COUN i
1f
0 ~
VIl~1,~ {~.II~INV
8-6-97 I-E Staff Report for ZE-27-97 page 28,1
~
.
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO: Spokane County Planning Departmen
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: July 22, 1997 `
PROJECT: DONWOOD INC.
FILE ZE0027-97 /
Hearing: 08/06/97 @ 1:30 #
Review Date: 07/23/97 @ #
Sponsor/Applicant: GORDON CURRY
Section Township Range: 17-25-45
Planner: FRANCINE SHAW
Design/Review Date: ( @ )
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
l. Applicant shall dedicate the amount of right of way for a total of 30
feet from centerline for the extension of Hodges Road and the
applicable radius for Hodges Road and Sprague Avenue.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
6. Based upon the intensity of proposed uses the County Engineer may
require a center turn lane to be installed on Appleway which is
adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 14-16 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development. An RID/CRP Agreement shall be executed for the
installation of curbing and sidewalk along the frontage of Appleway.
CC: Applicant GORDON CURRY
Engineer/Surveyor MICHAEL C. PHZLLIPS
a
Page 2 '
08/06/97
ZE0027-97
7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
8. The applicant shall construct paved and delineated approachs to meet
the existing pavement on Appleway.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of
Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby
request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described
property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the
formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s)
described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement
District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing
Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed
under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not
filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the
alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter
35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below,
said owner ( s) and successor (s) f urther agree : (1) that the improvement s
or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and
(2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by
the property included therein, together with the amount of any County
participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID,
and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently
developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and
successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCw 36.88.090,
to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by
either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to
appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further,
it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment
estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased
true and f air value improvement ( s) add ( s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane
County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the
owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
• . '
Page 3 `
08/06/97
ZE0027-97
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10)
years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable
to Hodges Road and curb and sidewalk on Appleway.
11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
1
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Friday, July 11, 1997 10:57 AM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott
Subject: ZE-27-97 - Donwood, Inc. Importance: High
7/11 /97
I received the above referenced project application on July 10, 1997. The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as
being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate. Therefore, since this is
an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is required. We have no information that says
there are any critical areas on this site.
I consider this proposal to be technically complete.
I recommend using our standard drainage condition.
Vill ~e.~~ciu yd
Page 1
•
.
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR7ti1ENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DEtvNis M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
~ RFCa~~D
NIEMORANDUM MA Y 06 1997
C°u~' ~iQeer~.
~
TO: -9at@UaW.e-fi,,,%pQk.a&aeAQ% ua4jrD.g
Jim Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities
Steve Holderby, Spokane Regional Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair
Steve Worley, Stormwater Utility
Bill Hemmings, Development Engineering Services
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Valley School District No. 356
Fire District No. 1
Consolidated Irrigation District
FROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner -
DATE: May 6, 1997
RE: Revised site plans for the proposed Zone Reclassification, ZE-27-97; from
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light Industrial (I-2)
Enclosed find copies of the revised site plan for the above referenced zone
reclassification. Revisions have been made to the site plan submitted to your office on
March 10, 1997. Please replace the original plan with the revised copy. Please review
and forward any comments by May 19 1997. If you have any questions, you may contact
me at 456-3675.
c: Donwood, Inc. c/o Gordon Curry, 502 N. Glenn Road, Spokane, WA. 99206
Michael C. Phillips, 909 N. Argonne Rd., Spokane, WA. 99212
1026 WsST BxoaDwAY AvEwE • SPOKANE, WASHINCTON 992()0
PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 4564703
TDD: (509) 324-3166
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
In the Matter Concerning ZE-27-97; Zone Reclassification )
from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light Industrial ) NOTICE OF
(I-2) ) PUBLIC HEARING
)
Applicant: Donwood, Inc. c/o Gordon Curry )
TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers within 400 feet of proposal, as listed
on Spokane County Assessor's records. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ABOVE-
REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW:
Hearing Date: August 6, 1997 Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light Industrial (I-2) for those
uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
Applicant/Owner: Donwood, Inc.
c/o Gordon Curry
502 N. Glenn Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
(509) 928-0600
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Appleway Avenue approximately 1/3 mile east of
the intersection of Appleway Avenue and Barker Road in the SW '/4 of Section 17, Township 25 N.,
Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5).
Comprehensive Plan: Urban.
Environmental Determination (SEPA): A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issued. The
Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency. The official comment period ends August 4, 1997.
Related Permits Not Included in Application: None.
Division of Building & Planning Staff Ferson: Francine Shaw; Senior Planner (509) 456-3675
: • , ' .
. u I C
G
~
~
~1~..~ s..
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 1
HEEcEIvcD
SPOtCANc COUNTY
- MAR 3 )997;
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLATlNING
:3Y.
~ . ' . SPOlUJ1E ENYIRgIQtfIiTAL ORDINANCE
(u1►C 19i-11-960) kctton 11 10.t70(1)
fnviroi*mentel Checxlisc
Ovrposc of CAettltst: F11t Nq.
The State Environoental Policy Act (SEPA) cnapter 43.21C RCu. repuires all gover miental agcnctes to conslder the environmentil iaoacts of a oro9osal
Defore nekinq Aecisions. An Enrironiaental Impatt Statertent IEiS) must be preDared fOr all OropoSalS ritA proDaDlc Signifitant eEverse impatts on
tne aw lity af the enviro m+ent. TAe Durposc of thls checkltst ts to provide inforrnation ta help you and tne agency idenclfy impacts frora your
p*'oDcsA1 (and to redute or avo14 impaCts troo tl+t proposal. 1f tt Can be done) and to help the egency OtCide rAether an Ef5 ii requireA.
tnstructtons for Apolicants:
Thii environaental checkltst aiks you to descrtbe sooe bastt lnforcoation ebaut your proposal. GoverrYaental aqencfes use tAfs chectlist to determine
rhetAer the environarntal impacts of your pro0osal are stgniftcanc. requiring qrepnretion of an E15. Ansver the Questions briefly. ritn the most
precise lnforaation tna.n. or qive the Dest Cestrtptton you can.
You esust ansrer eath Qveitton atturately •na tarefullr. to tt+e Dest of Your kn a+ledge, in coost Cases, you shoul0 Oe aDle to ansve► tAe questions
froA your own observations or projett pians without tAe need to h+re e:0erti. fI you reaily Oo not tnor tAe ansuer. or tI • puestion does not 7DD1y
to your pro0osa1. rrlte 'do not knw' or 'doei noi ipply.' ta.plete ansrers to the questions naw mwr •rof0 unnetessarr delays later.
Sore Questtons ask about qovern.ental requlatlons. SutA ai iontng. SAoreilne. ♦nd landmerk designetlons. Answer these Questlont If you can. If you
hive proble.s, the gevern.ental agersctes can aiiiit you.
The thectltst Questtons •DOiy to 411 D+rt1 of raur pro0osal. even fI you olan to Eo theii over a perloC of t1n,e or on 41/1e►ent oarcels of 1and.
AtCatA anr additfOna) 1nfprmtti0n Chat ti111 QtSCfiDe your Dro0oia1 Or ttf lnvfl'Onaent0) effeCtS. Tht •glnCy t0 rA1Cf► you SuOmIL tPlii CheCkllSt may
ask you to exvlain your aniwers or provide •ddltlona) tnlonaatlon reasonaDlr relateC te detern1n1nq It Cl+ert may De sfqnificant eGverse imoecL.
Use of cAectllst for nonproject prooosals:
Caaplete tA1s checklist for nonproject prooosals. even though Questions may be ansrereG 'Coes not aooiy'.
(N ADOtT10N, cojplete the SUPPIEMEMT!►t SMEET i0R tlO!IVAOJECI ACT10NStFart O1.
For nonDrojeCt attfons. the referenCet in tAe ChetkllSt to the w rdi 'proje R.' 'aOOliCant,' and '0►aDerty or iitt' Snou1E De read as 'proposai,'
'oroooser.• anA 'effected qeoqraphic aree.' resoectlvely.
A. BACKGROUl10
1. 'laoe of proposed project, tt aDO11caGle:
2. 'Iaie of Applicanc: 4:11
J. Addresz and phone nuR0er ot ap011Cant er ContaCt person: ~ v~ ~ l-~F=~.sa H J~"1CY- ~e~ O ~0~0 Q
Oate Chetk 1 iSt Dre9arefl:
S. Agencr reQueztSng Cnetkilst: :1 N i`L
6. ProposeC tloing or sthedule tincludtng Dnasing. 11 appl R abltl: v
7. Oo you have anr D1ans for future addtttons, e:oanston. or lurther utlvlty relaced to or co m ecteE w1th t1+1: prooosal' It yes. evtesn.
!~t vl /T f'L~7/ n~
• C.~~~!~' l~ ~~~~~~~~L ~=t). I~'?/i/?t~ ~}-f~., l~ ~C
[ t
D. Do you oun or have options an land nearOr or •CJacent to tnls proposalT/If yes. exotiln. Q~ZJ~
8. List anr envlron.ental infornatlon you knor aDout tnit has D an Orep+red. or rill be preosred. dtrectly related to tAis proposai.
Rev.2/11BB 1
~ spor.A:E [wtRoW--Y'ni. oe2tyuice .
(.eC 1'►)-lt-9N;1 See:ion li.lC.:]7(1)
' A. 5wpG'l0V7rJ tcoat:mv:C)
9. Do la+ know vhe=her s oLCcacton• are pcodtnq tor 80ver ncal •pproval• of otner prono"lo :Crecclv a!!:c;:-%r : -i. prnpr.r~ cover•.e bv -nur
~ropo~~l' I! /.s.
l0. lSsc an7 govecncent spproval• of pervtu that vtll be oceded fot la+r 9roDo-1• l! 1mow+.
ll. Gtve • brte(, caeplece ea.criacio„ of rwr psopoaal, lncluding the Droposed use• •ad tlre al:e ot the ptojtct •nd atce. -herc ate severat
quasttoeu lacec to tht• chectllsc cRAt •iit r w to deeerlbe eerialn •sqset• o[ yous 9io9os+l• Ya+ do noc necd to repert thost ansvers on ehts
• paqe.
, _ f\"~~ ~~1 ~ .
. ,
Ak
t / -
Locaclen ot the proposal. Cive w ltletent tnto r_Wtton !or apetion co underataod tn• prec.o• 1ocat:on o: eou: proposec prc ec:. :n::udinr. +
sereet addreme. St snv, and •eeclon. tovru hlp snd e&nte. tt 1Aa+n. it • propo"l voute oceur o•er a r4n;e c! •c u. p*r::-,e the canqe oc
Dounlartes of the ilte(e). FtovtA• • legal doneelDtion, oite D1an. K elnlry n+p. and :oDogcaonle as;. Ie&toeu D1~ •va.;~~:e. .'ti: : • y ou
snould fu0olt any p:ans requtrsd D} the •gcnt-1, you ace not reQulred to Cuplttate asD& ot detallad plane su trai::e: vttt+ anv ;e:r1: a;)o:t:atton
retsced to tnls cMCk:tsc.
13
3oss the proDOseC acclon lie vlthl~ the Aq~:l'ec Setulttve %re• (15 A)~ ~era1 Se/ver Se M.ce Are~' ~~c ?'::'::v $~we: it'•'.cr ~rea~ ~ye
o[ Spo"ne' 'See: Spoiane :ovn[v'► A5A ')vetlAy Ione 1W.40 :ar 9oundarles).
I
, . ~ .
-o ee caMFt.r-Eu eT A.FrL:cA.r,
S. LMLR0V":1".1L1 LL..`C^r5 :valwo- Fo:
,44enev :~e •?r'y
E AP.:P. -
a. General dascrtption of the •tce (circle one)- t L t, rolling, rtl1Y. Gt n> 9100em, sountatews,
o c !+e r :
b. '.'hst la the staepest •lopc on the olta :spDto:iaate perceet •lope)'
c. 'rhic genersl :7Des ot lotls •re tound on the •ice (tor exunpla, clay, uod, g:avel, pe+t, ouctl'
if you knov he t:asalCi u tlon ot +gcleultutal •o ls, •peeltv then •nd note any prlae .`an laed.
L~a
d. ♦re tAere w rfaee tndlcacloaa or hlscoty of urucable soils In the temediace viclnltv' in,
descrite. /I f(~
,
' • 1; OMr.EHTA~ OAOtNAtcCF
(uAC 197-I1-9601 Sectton I1.10.270(1) SPOKJIME ENY
8. EMY;ROM4ENTAL EZ,EMEHTS(continued)
Evaluation For
e. OescrtDe the Agency Use Only
purDaie, type. •nG ao0ro:imate 0uantities of anr ffllfng or qrading DraDased.
Indicate source of f111, i
f. Could erosion oocur as i result of clear ng, constructton. or use? Sf so, generally descrtoe. • •
~ ~
.
'AOOUL rh
g. at pertent ot the stte rlll Oe tovered rttn imaervtous surlaces stter project construc-
tion (for example, asDh+1t or Euildin9s)? 1.- /
ra C'C.'Cc~~,
PrOppSed aKafurlS t0 reEute OI COntsol eroS10n, Or Ot1+er IApatts t0 t11! HrtA, 1f any:
` '~_JCJ
J,
.
~
2. AiR
A. uhec [y9e o/ eniSSSOnt to tl+e a1r vould result lrpm tne pro0osa1 (1.e.. dust, w toaoCllt. otOrs
induSL►tai, wooE sepke) durtny COrtStruCtlon •nd unen th! D*OjeCt 1S COnOtittt4T if any, ,
generally Qestripe •nd give •o0ro:tmate qwntttes If kn n. ' _ ~,I I ~~,~r~f~~ r{`~ /1 ~~t ~(~~'i~•~J -
' r 'G l. 7 - ,
~.•F,/ vJ ~ ' / ' 1 j ~ ' ~ ~ ~ /
1.~.~ •:L-+.~ ~ • . ~ ~
0. Are Lntrt any off-ifte Sourtes of enisilons or Odor tAat nuy affeCt your pr00ota{' 1f so. ~,~~•/i.r~~~,
9enerally dcstrib / . /~i~► ~ ~ r ~ ~.~~JI ~ ,
e.
/L
4 ~ ' /
c. Provosea mensures to reduce o• tontrol emissfons o otAer tmoetts to •1r. tf anr: ~,y ~n~ jr~t •t ~
~ -
, ~l ~~1 ~II." ~ J ~ r ~ /
3. uaTER
~
a. Surface:
(1) ls Lhere eny Surfate rater Oody on or in the taikeEleie vlctnlty ef the ilte incluCtnq rea r
round anG seasonel streans. saltrater. lakes. aonds. reclands)? lf yes, aescrlDe type •nd
provide nernes. l( approprl8te. statt rAat Stresm or rfver tt flors into.
(2) 11i11 cne projeeL requtre any vork over. 1n, or idjacent to Iwlthln 100 feetl the descriDea
racers'. lf yes. pleese describe and attacr avella le plans.
3
~ . . SPO[A2a L:QVI.ROi4MIT1L ORD(NANCL
(JAC 191-11-960) Sectton I1.1b.230(1) ~
S. LTNIROtMLYTAL CLL`(L^r;$ (conclnued)
Evalwtion For
Agency Uee On17r
(S) Eattmete the 4oount o( ttll and dredge ticeslal ctut vould De 0 Lced la ot reooveQ (rom the
sur(ace wacer of veclend• and indlcate tl+e •re• ot cl+e •i[e tTut vould Oe aftecced. [c+dtcsce
the •outce ot itll aacerial.
(L) Ylll the proposal requlre •uctae• wace[ vithd n wl• oL divaislons'. G1w a Zeoeral descrip-
tion, pucpose. and approsiaate aw nclclaa. 1f kaove. .
~D
(5) Doas the proposal lf• vithin a 300-rsar tlood p o' It so. eoc• loucfon oe the •!t• pLo.
!/i' L~ •
f5) Does the propoaal terolvs •nr dlsclu rZo• of vuce material• to surtace vacsrs' it •o,
deacrtDa the type ot vastt •nd aocleipated volum of dtsclu r6a•
/vO
b. Ground:
(1) Vtll aroundvater Ee vlthdrawn, or wtll vacet Ee dise!►ataed to groundvacer` Cive ;snsral
deserlption, purpoee, and •9protliaate aw ncicisi, if lmovn.
Osigerlbe wasts eacerial tAac vill De dlaelu «ed inco the fcouod (roO •*ptic tsnk• or oc?+ef ~ /
uoitary vast• CTYmtOf [aclltcy. Dasetibe the teneral sic• ot the OrOtm, the eumDer of
Aouse■ to be •etvad ( Lt •yplleiDlo) or the eumDer ol pe[sonA the •7stea(s) afe eipcctsd to '•~1 t_ ~ ~ L ( t~ ' t, i (.'t
ftfVt. ~ ♦
, ~!r r . . ~ F 7
(3) Descrfbs anr •Yatess, ocher thao thos• desiga.d !or the dispo"l of aaeitar7 vuce,
lostalled tot the pur9ose ot dlscharainS [lutd• Delov chAt grwnd •urtac• (Laeludes systear •ue1+ '
•a thos• for cAe diaponal o[ •tocs vatar oc dtalaat• ltom Iloor dtalos). Deses1be the typo ot
srscem. th• • wuat of wtecial to b-a dispoead ot throusA cla •rstti snd the q pe• of baceitsls
llkelr to pa dlapos%A of (lncluaini aaterisl• vhlch saT eote[ the tyscm lnad.4rtoncl7 tArwgh
Wll• oc a sesult oi ilretlgAtlnt attlvttiss).
~ /~Z/j~-~ , ► ! , ~ .
Vlll •ar cAoicals (especia117 orgaale •olvencs or petrolsua Iw 1s) be scored to 4bove-
6round or undargTOuad •toraes caeks' If •o, vAat qp.• •od quantitie• of satecial• vtll be
atoced•. . •
6
~ lTOIU1NG QqVISOHl2?1TJ1. OlDI4ANCY
(4AC 191-1I-960) Sectlon I1'.10.2J0(1) ' • ,
LN7LRONlQfTTAI, LLL~1';S (conclnued)
' Cv~lu~cton Fo[
Ageoc~ U~e On1y
(S) Vhat protectlv~ oe~~ure~ vill be ~~hen to lnwre tlut lut~ or •ptll• of ~n~ tluniul•
~cored or uscd on •!te vtll not be ~lloved to percol~ce to stouadv~ter (thl• lcclude• ee~~ure~
to 4eep chenlcal~ w t ot dl~po~~l •r~tes~ Je~ttlD~d ln ~b(1) ~oA ~E(]):
_`~~r ~e...
~
c. V~cer Runo([ (includlna •coro vacer):
(1) O~~criD~ tRe •oure~ o! ~uaatt (tneludle~ •toe~ v~t~r) ~ad ietbd ot toll~ecion and di~poaal o ` ~
!f anr (lnelud• Q w ntftl~~, 1t knov~+). Vh~r• vtll thl• v~t~r Ilov! Vtll thl~ v t~r tlov laco ~
. ~ j .t~.r;~,~ ~ . - ~ c. ~ ; ,
otAer vat~r~. I! ~o, de~t[ibt. ~ ~ ~ 1
~=S ~i~ ~ v%c~ ~ ~ ~ _l ~ ' ~ :
,~r ~~~rr;'~ L..~' C...
,
.
~ ~~y,~; C~%~~.l~f C~~~ ~
, ,
l ~ " , {y~ ~ ~/ys!1f'~~~~
, . ' , ~
~ I , ~I
J111 an~ cA~ait~l~ Se •cottd. A~nd1aE or u~eA on the ~it~ le • loutioo vMrt • ~plll or (a( ~t 5~~ /1 '\~.~~•%L~: ~
le~k vtll d~~ln to ~u~f~ce or ~roundv~t~c or to ••coca v~t~r diapoa~l ~~~t~ di~clu~;tr~ to ~ U ~.l
~ ~ ~
•urt~ce o~ ~~oundwt~r.' y`/~ L~{„p }~~iri /.1 J/ ~~;I'i ~
~S ~ ` < < , / .
,,•J
+ ~ ~~~I~li\i~~'1//~~~ ~,'J ~ J~ ~~~~5~."1.f/"~'~
i /
~7° / ,~y
~ ~ ~ L! ~i(_ ) G ~ % ~ / l /!r ~ ~ -
~ .<<~~~~ _
Could v~~tt ~t~clai~ •nt~r ~rwnd ot w~f~ce .~ter~' t! •o, a~~.~.iir a..~rt~.. ~ J'.~ L~ ~
% I
~ f
~ ~ r`
/~ri /_~c~ 5'~- \ ` ~ ~ . ~ 1~~~~~'`~'~~s;•r;.G'~L~f/
h ~ . L ~
l ~ ~~~•'~'~l :.~~•Y~~~n~~'~:-~f!•~~
, % • i ; ~t ~ / ~ ~ „
d. Ptopo~~d o~a~uv~• to r~Cue~ ot eoeteol w~lae~. iround. •nd eunofl v~t~r ispaets, tf •01 (if > l .l~('~`~~/``~
t ch• ptopo~~d •eLlon 11~~ vit1tie cA~ Aaui~~r Sartatti~♦ A~u D~ •~p~el~ll~ tlur oo •s91~n~tion~ ; ~°'f~! ~ ' ( ~ ` ~ . _
t ~~Leto.a to t~ellitiu toeu~enias S~etioe~ )D(~). 3p(S). ~ed k(2) ot tA1~ eluekll~t): LI Iq
._r~~_ ~ _ ~ .
/~J ~ ~ i,:
r ~ ~ f ~ I ~ ~l l ~l l. ..i ~ ~
h ~ ~a~e ~ ` ~
~ ~ 1 ~/_i.~ /i~ l, C '-~,Z-f`; ~~f'c!.,
f ~ ,
P~.,~~;5 , ; ~ ,•1. ~
a. rTecti or circle t ~ I-, ~ ' ` _ ~
YD~ a~ wQac~tlon ~ound on the ~ltt: ~ 1
~U
-~yt~ ~1~ / r l . _ ~ ~
~d~ttduou~ ttce: alder. m~pl~, a~pen, othst. 1~/~' .1 ( ~ -
•vergreen tr~~: fl~. eedar, ptne, otl►er. r~ , ~ / ! ~ J ~ % ~I /1
~ ~,l_'~'.-~ ~,_li~~. - ; ` .
. n ru e.. ~ j~
~ YT.... ' - ~d,Ll ~
. ;
o..~~r~.
«oo o~ =r.io. ~
vec •oil pLat~. eacCail. ~uttercup. Du11~wA. ~k~ cabD~~e, ocl+er.
v~c~r pl~at~: v~tsr lillr, •el~sa~~, ailloil, otl+ec.
otR~s c~p~• ot v~a~c~tion.
0. Vh~c klad •nd uount ot v~~~t~tlon vlll ~ reoved or •lt~red! Gv~/
~
t. Ll~c chre~cened or eod~es~red ~pecl~~ 1moK► to ~ on o~ eaa~ che •ite. ,~~(/~~`l
` ~~z/;~~~r-'~ j~?= ~
~ ~ ~
d. Propo~ed l~nd~eapln~, w• ol o~civs pLncs. or ocfur ~e~~u~f~toib~e~e~ve o~ enhanc• v~ etatloo ~ ~ L 'I1i ~
on ch• ~l~a. 1[ •nr: ~Ci /7tQ~L7~ Q t ~(~'~,',9iJl~~ f
,f
~ , ~i .
('~fj.~,~,: ~~`~1 . ~ - ,
, 1
s > ~.f~~~; ~,('1~'~ -
~y~~~ ~
~
r ' ' ,a~ -
~ ~YL. ~ ~7
, SDOKAxE EMY1R0"E„TAL OR4I„ANCE
,-;:•C 13'-.i-96C; Sec:ton li.rb.230f11
B. En•i;ROtMEMilL ELE!'FKTS Iconcinueal
Evaluetion for
Aqenty 'JSe Only
S. ANIM.-I:
e. :ircle eny piras ena AA1fAdIS uniCn nere oeen ooserved on or neer tne S1te or ire tn w n tc :e
or neer tne sice:
Oirds: nart, neron, tegle. SongOirOs, otner:
mamnals: deer. Oeer. elk, beaver, other:
{isn: bass, selmon, trout, herrin9. sneilfish, other:
ot►+er:
b. list any tnreetened or endengered sDecies knwn to De on or near the s1te.
C. Is tne site part of a oiqration route? If so, exolatn.
4, DrpDOied oMSUrei t0 0►est►vt or ennanCe rildlt/e. 1f anr: qr. Q~~ S
I
5. EyfQuY ANO VATURAI 4:i9URC:5 ~
a, vhat tinas of ene►qy (elettric, nstural ges, waoo stove. solar) wIil De used to mest tne
tne comoleted 2roject's energy neeas' DestriDe rnetner tt w111 De useC for neettnq, nanu!at-
Iurinq. et:.
O, uould your projec: aflett tne pocenttal use o/ soiar enerqr oy adjacent prooerttes' sc,
generelly GesCrioe.
c. vnat tinas of ener9r conservation feetures •►e inclvaed in tne plans of tnis orooosal' :it:
otner Proooset Mssures to ~edu or cantrol energy t~acts, 1f enr:
~h~
l 1~
~
u• i l ~
~
7. ENVIAOMMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are enere any envtro nmentat Reettn hezards. lneludtng erwosure to toxit cnanicats. rist ot ftre
and expiosion, soill. or nsisrdous wasce, tnat could otcur as e result el tnis propasal? so,
describe.
(i) Oescribe eciai eneryency services et iqnt be require
b
, . • lTOKAHL Ly9IH0lQQ:tL>L. OYDINA21R
(VAC 19.'-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1)
6. CY7IROH122fC►L LLZ)(LY;S (conctnued) Cvaluaiion for
Agency Uoe Only
EttViROH1S-v:f;A1. HtAL:'R (tontinued)
(2) Proposed veaeure• co reducs ot eoncrol enviroomencJ !►ealth hatards, it •oy:
b. Hotse:
(1) vlut tYpu of no1e• e:ist lo the aru vh1cA aay a!lect youc ptoject (tor •tample: tta(tlc. f~1.oeeQulp~ant, opeCatloo, ocher,
,-J/ V i-t~
1s ol noles wauld be eruted Lry or ewocLtoE vith the pro}tet on • ~ ~i
2) vTut t1D•s aod 1•ve`} n
( traftle. eonctvction. operatioo, oc!»r)! IMie~t• //~;C•i-~
shorc-ceeo or s lon;-tecs pasl• (Ios ssaeple:
~ •
vhac houts nolse vould coae (ros the s1te. /
'
` •~~l M ,
Proposs0 aeasure to teduc♦ or control nolse topeets, 1f •oy: f ~1 • ~
„ ~
8. l.► .'D A?rD SHOMI'!L USE
v1+at !o the cu«enc us• of the •ite •nd &,n•cent propartier'
p. Ilas the •ice been used for asrtculture` Il so, desttlDs.
/
c. Oeacrl0etanr str ture• on the slte. i Se- ~ al~~~ tS~' ~"Y
~
d. Vtll anr •cructur¢e Ee deoollmhed! [t •o. vhlch! t7-fe-cr-
/
1Aat 1n the CuTTtqC saain= claeeifiestion ot the s1taT 7-~
Wuc 1• the cu«eut eoopreheoslve pLe+ designatloo ol cRe sits
. ~ ~rA
-
S. Lt •pplicable, vhat ig t!u turTeot •Iwnline saater yro/ru dsslgnaclon o[ CM $ite!-_~.~. ~ ! ' `l/
i• ' ~',~r,~:/r~f,( r.~~F ~ lL~,
~
r. Ha• aoy psrt of the •ite besa classltled •o 'envico~ocall? Ko~ltivd' are&' tl •o, ~
•petitr•
S. Appro:laacelr hw aaaY people vould teslde or voct !a c1+e comDleted prolecc? ~
)
' srauxz cMIDIOCvt►i. oancru►Na
(uAC 197-11-960) Sectioa 11.20.230(1) ' •
6. CPOIAOH?Q1RLL Q--2RT5 (coatlnv+d)
I !valuacton For
~ Agenc~ U~e Ortly
~pace, ~
J. Appro:lo.cely Aov ~oy peoplt vould the coopLeteJ proJect di l.
k. PropoBed oe-uree to avotd or rsduce dlsplac rosot tupacts, it aM : ~Nv--,
1. lroposed me4@u«• to •nouc• t1w proposal 1• compat101e vith tulotinS •ad proyected Lnd w4• aod %1,~ i• ~
plsns, 1t •ny:
f
O,, /
, ' ~ / ~/'~L ~ I ~ • , a
; ;
/J l
9. HOUS ING • ~s 1. ~ , i ~ `
A. Apptoxinatelr hw wny unlt• vould De psovldad. 1[ •nyt Iodteat• rkytlu[ Aljh-. u1ddlr-, oc
lorlKOOe Aouslng. i • " '
/L~Ov7 ~
b. Apptozioately 1+ov sanr unito. ll acy. vould De alidnatedf Iodiut• vFrttrr hith-. 1ziddle-. ot
lOwtKOas Aousttij. +
c. PropoocA osasurg• to reduee or coetrol Aousln; lapscto. 1! •or:
10. ALSTItf'ICS
A. Vhat 1o the tallest rslght of •ny proposed stCUCturs(e). oot ts►eludlnt •eeaemai! Ylut t• th*
pTlncipal e:tettot Dyildiag oateC1a1(t) ,topooed!
'
~
~
b. tlhat vlev• Ln [he laaedta[e v1e1nLC7 would bt altettd or obstn+eted!
C. ►roposed %s~.urj to reduee ov to ,Fol saachacie lsDects. it •oy: '
L
Pi,
11. LIG„- AND CLARE
A. :Rut try• of li;ht c Sl.&re vill t!r ropowl pcoduce'. jfut tise ot day vwld tt aalnly octut'
.
/ ~
~•~~CN/ /2.G/
y
b. Could liahc or Lce lros cha floishad pro}ecc be a "tacy Msard or locertos• vicA •Lve?
-7
- ts a~ •ll~ct ~ouc yroposal!
C. Vfu[ eslsciog oft site •wr of liaht or jL 7 .
d. troposed seswres to teducelot control llsht •ad glAr• Ls9scto. 1! •oy.
- , ~
^.6
. ,
° aw~~ e
~ . ~ SpqtAtiL LMRO!tri?`rTA.1. OitDINA.WCL
. .
(vAC 197-11-960) Sec:lon 11b10.230(1)
3. L`M iROld27RAL CI.L`(L(coocfowd)
Evaluatlon For
Agertcy Uee Only
12. AECRLA:I011
~ ~~dl~ce vtcintt.'
a. vhat deeigoated and lntorani ecreatlocul opportvnltlee in c
~
b. Yould tl+• propo•ed pcolset dlsp Lec sny a:irtlaQ recreAtlo"l uses'• tt •o, deacrlbe.
c. Ptoposed su sures to redues ot eontsol layeccs oo tOetu tion, fotludie►A rocru clocrl oDOortucl-
cie• to be Qtcwtdad bf th• pcoJett or •ppllcaot. !f •np: .
~
13. HIS'OR[C AND CZlLTU1tAL f1tLSLAVA7.108
Are tt+ere •n7r p14css ot oOJect• llated oa or pcoqo sed fos NLSOtfal. stat• ot local pteserva-
tlon register• knova to be o0 or n.ac to t M stte' It so, genera117 descrlD..
p. Cenerally deseribe •ar 1ac+4wrts or evldanee o! hlstotlc scct~~y/logl~ .acient5:ic or :u::vral
lepottance 1mo~m to be o0 oT ne:c to tro slce. /1/~/~~ '
c. Proposed oeasure• [o rsduee or coatrol topeccs. 11 •oy: /lGn ez- ,
14. Tw15POR'A:ION
tdenclfy publLc stceet• and hlghvays •ervlnt tlte •lts •t+E deocribe pteDoecd acces• to the
e:lsting screet •yste2. $t+oroa •tte pLnA, lt an7r. . ,
Z_ L ~ . ,
r"
b. 1• site turrently •a[ved br publlt ccanl!y' Lf not, vluc 1o the •pPro=Lsa« d:scaoce [o :he
oearesc craoalc scop' ~1
~
c. nov a.ny parkint space• vould tM tTL~c~d rojeet han2 Sav %&eT vould c!v pro,Lci a12eio.te` l-'-~',~~.~~
13('/1~'
~ . ~4 ► ~1~~'i c,~~:'~( ..C~.~ ~ -P<
lo~-/Lfi ~
d. Vill the ptopoeal CtQuirs sny aRV road• ot •creeta, or impro.rsrots to •zietlv; toads oe 4treat
not intludio4 dcfv~vn~ 1 It •o, tew cally descriLo (lodi u te whacl+ar puAlie or pctvace). /
i .(r / r 1
.o~1~1n' r
~
~ ~l l
il, or ~lr ~rsa~post~ttoo'
e, Yt11 the project usa (or otcur lo the loaadlate rtciaic7 0!) ~tet, ta
tt •o, Senerally descct0e.
9
~ . sroxurt GwIioer¢naL onntM"cr
(vAC 197-11-960) Seccioe 11.lb.230(1)
~
e. II+YZROtfQN".A1. CLDO?f'f5 (cootlawd)
Cvelwtlon /or
Agencj Use Oo17
t. Nav ynr vehLcular crlp• per dar vou1J Dw generated by the cteplated project' I[ imovn.
tadlcate vheo pealc vovld ottut.
/
t. Proposed asasures to reduc• or coacrol t n espotCatioa irpac u, t( an7:
15. PU'DtIC SERVZCLS
0. 'JOUld the pc+ojoec eesult la &n loeru sed ow d lor pvllie •e"iea• ([or •sss91e, tlrs psoteetioo,
polic• procaetion. rea1tD eace, seAoola. 5poot r)t If so. jonetall) deK Tlbe.
E. Proposad •eaguras eo redet• os caatrol dtraet impaec• oa pupllt •eevlces. l.• •nyt
16. l.:2LT~itS
S. Ctrcle utlllcies currontly w•!1"Id ♦c the •ite: •l~ctrlclt~ n+tural gas,( 4 tas4celus. ~
ssrvlce/lalephaolten •s w~ •tptlt @r~tes. oClL7T.~ i ~
D. DescriDe the ucilltle• tluc art proposed tot the projecc. the utillt7 provldlog the •on!c• •ad
tAe ^.entral eoeucevettoa aetlvitia• oe the s1te ot !o the la"dlst• vltinler vhieA aigRt De
nseded.
C. 52GNA;4RL
I, tho unde[signad. wvaar undoc the yenalcy of petjuty cAac the ♦Dov• respooos• ar• mad• trutAtully aM to che best of ay kaevled{e. [•lso
undetstand tlut. slould tM te 0* aoy vtlltul aisr4orssGoc&cloo or villtul LcY ol lull diselosur• on sy v•rc. ct+e .t.neY .ar vtcndr&v •nr
dscermlnacion ot non.ignitleaoc• tluc 1t a1tAt lssue !o re ~ upoo thls tAeetllst.
o.cs: s o osac
rriac or Type)
►toponeat• AQdtesa: 4 l.0Q~ `f
/ v (Sle
Pl+o e. : n . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ .
Psreoo cosplscleg fora: 04cs: //0
Phone:
FOR STAT1 OSL OHLT
Scatf oebsr(s) reviwing thaclcllst: ~ 1 J,~~/~~f~ ~
Doosd ae cRio,stat[ reviev ot the sovironaencal clvtkllst and otMr p~ tloeat intocmatloe. the statf:
A. Cootluda• thac CAere are ao pcoEable •tsnitl uot advers~tspacc• and rscaarad• a dateraloatloo of eoostgaiticance.
e• Conelude• ihat yroDapl• •lgnitleaoc ad w rse en.i:ves ecal impaets do e:ist tor t1+s cu Reoc proposal •nd racoaoeodii a otcl;aced decer-
oloacion ot oonslgnitleaoee vltA eooditions.
C. Conelude• that cheCe •re proDaDle signitiuat •dverse •oviroasental lapacLs sod recasoeode a detecsloatloo of •Lgnltleaace.
TTLIIIG TE= - $75.00
10
.
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
ItESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAIY[ES L. MANSON, DIRE CTOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-27-97
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
to Light Industrial (I-2) for those uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Donwood, Inc.
c/o Gordon Curry
502 N. Glenn Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
(509) 928-0600
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located north of and adjacent to Appleway Avenue
approximately 1/3 mile east of the intersection of Appleway Avenue and Barker Road in the SW
'/4 of Section 17, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGFNCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on f le with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., August 4, 1997, if they are intendecl to alter the DNS.
All comments should be sent to thc contact person listed below.
By: Francine Shaw Title: Senior Planner
Phone: (509) 456-3675
Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
DATE ISSUED: , 1997 SIGNATURE:Q~
OZ,' G{~
U
COMME[~M REGARDING ENVIRONMENfAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT 'IT-TE HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COLJNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the
signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the
appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of
Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper
3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
4. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski
7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
8. Spokane County Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
9. Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glenn Miles
10. Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
11. WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher
12. Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
13. Fire Protection District No. 1
14: Central Valley School District No. 356
15. Consolidated Irrigation District
I
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
rii:k;EivEo
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLI(AMNcouN1`Y
MAR 3 1991,
PART I
OIVI910N dF BUIIAINCi APJD PI.ANNtNG
A. CrNrRAL INrORMATI(.)N:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: .
MAII.ING ADDRESS: /v ~ (r__ I" n
CITY: ~ ~~Atf' STATE: LkA- ZIP: g-~I a0 ~
PHONE: Cj, :)-c.>,~ (work) (home)
IF APPL,ICANT IS NOT QWNER, INCLUDE VVRITTEN OWNER AUTI30RIZATION
FOR APPLICANI' TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATTVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECTIPROPOSAL SI'fC AREA (acres or sq. ft) ~~1~ •
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq.
A5SESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ___r
ASSESSOIt PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED,
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL --v, .
~ -
EXISTTNG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED)
/ ► /
EXISTING iJS@ OF PROPERTY
/ •
PROPOSED ZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOI. DISTRICT
FIRE DTSTRICT ~
WATER PURVEYOR l2_:5 -0 1/da4~ 7 "
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings O Duplexes O M~t ltifami dwellings O
MAnufacturecl homes O 13usiriess ~ ~dustri'aT~9) Mixec! Use O
Other ( ) - Describe:
i.IST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: l'r~vt`' B . T,FCAL/ZONF RTCT,ASSTI+ICATION INrORMATION:
a~ u b .
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Z/ _t~ 1~7- /e/ ~
SECTION TOWNSHIP ~qj t5- RANGE
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS:
/
WIDTH OF FROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLTC ROAD:
~~a ~
ZONE FtECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIALPO YES O NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAI. ROADS
~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSTFICA PgN PROPOSED -
EXISTING ZONE(S) _.La ~:3 • S- TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMP Y LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVII~E
BELOW. ~ / ~.5~ ~~o'cz~ov Q-~ ~cc .9•
~ -
7
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONqLTI ONS OF THE AR~A WH~ H YOU FEEL MKE THI
PROPOS WARRA~ITED? ~
--;7~
WHAT IMPACT WILL THEPROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES?
,
WHA FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION?
, cs ~ w s~=
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PR4POSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURRO DING LAND USE? e ~ - p d7YO~e~`~ i -s
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVTDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATTON THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSUI.TATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDCNTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHAL[. BE INCORPORATED
TN THE PROPOSAL-BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE, MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTIO IS--RIGT NO. ~
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) H" VE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER D FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PR4TECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ~I > ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATTON TIME. '
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
~ ~AU.~t F~
~FIRI DISTRICT S NATURFJTITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY AR fi ENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS AVE (HAVE NOT) BEEN MAllE.
B. REQUIREMENTSiCOMMENTS:
,
.
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUREfTITLE dDATE
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND llRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: > I! - 7 `lc
~ WG C~ / / UR~/I'IT E DATE
.
COUNTY UTILITIES
A PREI.IMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUDMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAI. (HAVT (HAV V NOT~~EEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS b n U -t
1
A. COMMENTS: S-e cJ. c -e•
~ ~ L ep~,,- It /-7 Z2L ~a
~ SIGNATURFITITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT
~
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE ANII~ RAL REQUIREMENTS F(3R
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVEk`.(HAVE NU BEEN SATISFI D
4~,`
- a~
lt~~A. ClJMMENTS:
~
~ SIGNATUREfTITLE r DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FUR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY TH APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: ~ /a r~
,
< L
S~IGNA1'URI?/'I'ITLE DATE ,
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART III
P,eL C. py SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
~ G~~ OF W
'~I ~e'~i • , A LICENSED LAND SURVEYQR, HAVE COMPLETED THE TNFORMATION
E ZONIN AP AND WRI DESCRIPTION. -
.
~
7678 DATE:
~
si
i
csCPHj 9 ONE:
o~'qt t~NO S: N
~ -y " DATE 019/`~ ZIP:
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETfER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OIt AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PER]URY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFUI.LY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFI@D LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNBR, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF,
NAME: DATE:
ADDRESS: PHONE: ~aZ ~~D~ o0
ZIP: ~9o~G~ jo
~
SIGNAtURE OF APP~.~iCANT OR PRESENTATNE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS I n I Q/ ~ DAY OF
. w..v-,.yr 1996, BY G., c~ ~rc~.n v. C. c,~ r►r ~
i
.•`~~,,'/Ef M,,~l~~''•
,,,~0~•!''~;... N.,,fi
♦ ~~eS_
NOR~~~`~~
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
i ~ PUBUC ~ 2 ? .
:~~r` Residing at: Q-
~ 'T~ O •
pp~~ My appointment expires:
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DNISI4N OF BUILDING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTED: FILE Z F- 1 ~
{ J
DATE ACCEP''ED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: •r 0 RECEI ,
( I ~1~ ~ I 1 ~.I 1 ll '1~ 1 / ~/~l ~/•1 ~L ~ ' C\ / l ~ f' . ~ f
~
~ Kimball, Sandy ~ - Z;- ~
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 1997 3:39 PM ~
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Pederson, John
Subject: ZE-27-97 - Donwood, Inc.
Importance: High
5/20/97
I received the above referenced project application on May 7, 1997. The Development Services Section of
Spokane County Engineering has determined this application to be technically complete.
No concept drainage plan is required for this proposal since it lies in an area of approved soils. We have no
knowledge of any geo hazards on this property.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Page 1
Washington State Eastern Region
Department of Transportation 2714 N. Mayfair Sireet
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000
March 20, 1997
Ms. Francine Shaw -
Spokane County Planning . . 1026 West Broadway Ave. . Spokane, WA 99260
. Re: Donwood Appleway Rezone
Dear Ms. Shaw:
After reviewing the above development proposal the Washington State Department of
Transportation has the following comments:
• Past traffic studies have shown that improvements will be needed in order to accommodate
the new traffic that development in the Barker Road corridor will generate -at the Barker
Road/I-90 Interchange. Improvements have been required through conditions of approval on .
these past developments as a direct result of these adverse impacts to the Barker Road/I-90
Interchange. Due to the location of this development and the potential use of the Barker Road interchange
we would request that this development prepare an intersection analysis for the Barker
RoadlI-90 Interchange. This analysis will need to identify any improvements that will be
necessary to serve this proposed development. Projects that have been approved by Spokane
County that have not yet been built out will need to be included in this analysis. We request
that this analysis be prepared and be submitted with this project's environmental
documentation.
. If you should have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact Greg Figg or
myself in our Planning Office at 324-6199.
. Sincerely,
- , ✓ ~,/1, ~ ; :
' U~ / G
MARK ROHWER `
. Regional Planning Manager
MR/gf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
! OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAY' DR-PLATS
TO: Spokane County Building and P1aruIIng De artment
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: March 20, 1997 ~
PROJECT: UR-3.5 TD I-2 SALES OFFICE STG
FILE DRZE-262-97)
Hearing Date: @ #
Review Date ,
Sponsor/Applicant: GORDON CURRY- DONWOOD INC.
Section Township Range: 17-25-45
Planner: FRANCINE SHAW
Design/Review Date: (03/20/1997 @ 01:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design
Review Meeting
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1q-lAL- -T o
1. Applicant shall dedicate right of way equaling 0 feet for the
extension of Hodges Road and the applicable radius for Hodges Road and
Sprague Avenue.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer. ,
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans.
--4. The ap:1 i ~~sha.-1-j_ ~fi Spo;cane ~.u aTrt,Y zrrg-i-n~~
•-a-Rd t-irc Spe-&n-e G94-~r - e a c ori~bine d-on-s-6tre-
- 6 drrd ~ .C2, _f..at~c. p7tGrf 16r che-eri~'~ re
nr--r~: if r h P r7P v P 1 n e n t
r _
5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
CC: Applicant GORDON CURRY- DONWOOD INC.
Engineer/Surveyor MICHAEL C PHILLIPS
r
~ .
Page 2
0 3 0 / 19 9 7 "j'i't e~
DR E-262-97 ~,ol~ & Iw
~ ~ ~-s ~a=t,a C..e-;~
4. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may,
/ with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to
t participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the
formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCw 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate
in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to
Hodges Road.
7. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated
herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and
participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost
of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Hodges Road.
8. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for
the improvement of Hodges which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approximately X feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk
must also be constructed.
10. Based upon the intensity of proposed uses the County Engineer may
require a center turn lane to be installed on Appleway which is
adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 14-16 feet of asphalt .along the frontage of the
development. An RID/CRP Agreement shall be executed for the
installation of curbing and sidewalk along the frontage of Appleway.
11. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
12. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(s) to
meet the existing pavement on Appleway.
''--±3 . ~ L~ Mi:ehiga4z R-ead ~l-~ 39-~a t-i=- ag_
~ A In- ~
r
k~ 14. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be
observed since the proposed development is affected by a flood hazard
zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer
before construction or development begins within any area of the
special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 80-0726).
~ Page 3 , 03/20/1997
DRZE-262-97 M~ h
16. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following:
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of
Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby
request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described
property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the
formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s)
described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement
District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing
Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed
under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not
filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the
alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter
35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below,
said owner ( s) and successor (s) further agree :(1) that the improvement s
or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and
(2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by
the property included therein, together with the amount of any County
participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID,
and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently
developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and
successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090,
to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by
either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to
appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further,
it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment
estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased
true and fair value improvement (s) add (s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane
County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the
owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10)
years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable
to Hodges Road and curb and sidewalk on Appleway.
17. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
r
~
Washington State Eastern Region
~ Department of Transportation 2714 N. Mayfair Street
,
Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207-2090
Secretary of Transportation ~
, (509) 324-6000
. March 20, 1997
Ms. Francine Shaw
' Spokane County Planning . 1026 West Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260
Re: Donwood Appleway Rezone
Dear'Ms. Shaw:
After reviewing the above development proposal the Washington State Department of
Transportation has the following comments:
• Past traffic studies have shown that improvements will be needed in order to accommodate
the new traffic that development in the Barker Road corridor will generate -at the Barker
Roadll-90 Interchange. Improvements have been required through conditions of approval on
these past developments as a direct result of these adverse impacts to the Barker Road/I-90
Interchange.
Due to the location of this development and the potential use of the Barker Road interchange
we would request that this development prepare an intersection analysis for the Barker
RoadlI-90 Interchange. This analysis will need to identify any improvements that will be
necessary to serve this proposed development. Projects that have been approved by Spokane
County that have not yet been built out. will need to be included in this analysis. We request
that this analysis be prepared and be submitted with this project's environmental
documentation. .
If you should have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to contact Greg Figg or
myself in our Planning Office at 324-6199.
Sincerely,
. . /
• ~ ',e~.~ . ~ l :
ROHWER
Regional Planning Manager
MR/gf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers
4✓
I J
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 1997 2:59 PM
To: Pederson, John; Shaw, Francine
Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott
Subject: Zone Reclassification - Donwood, Inc.
Importance: High
I received the above referenced project application on March 10, 1997. The soils in this area are approved and
therefore no concept drainage plan is required.
We have no information that would indicate that there may be any critical areas on this site.
O111 qe.xmiuga
Page 1
PAGE 1 ' 0 10:11:00 11 MAR 1997
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
00031 APPLEWAY AV (START) 00.000 SPR.AGUE AV U 14 PAVED 44
APPLEWAY AV 00.220 LONG RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
00.380 CORBIN PL (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
00.460 GREENACRES RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
00.530 CORBIN PL (END) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 44
00.720 BARKER RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 64
01.050 MICHIGAN RD (START) U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 64
APPLEWAY AV (END) 01.570 WSDOT TURNBACK TO I-
00032 APPLEWAY AV (LIBERTY 00.000 LIBERTY LAKE RD & I- R 07 PAVED 84
00.630 SIGNAL RD (START) R 07 PAVED 84
APPLEWAY AVE 00.950 MADSON ST R 07 PAVED 40
APPLEWAY AV (LIBERTY 01.220 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 07 PAVED 40
01.820 SIMPSON RD (LIBERTY R 07 PAVED 40
02.440 ROCKY HILL LN R 07 PAVED 40
03.200 SPOKANE BRIDGE RD R 07 PAVED 40
00121 APPLEWAY AVE (START) 00.000 WSDOT TURNBACK LINE U 19 PAVED 44
APPLEWAY AVE 00.240 BR 5515 OVER SPOKANE U 14 PAVED 60
00.440 WELLESLEY AVE EXTEN U 14 PAVED 60
APPLEWAY AVE (END) 00.450 IDAHO STATE LINE U 14 PAVED 60
3 Records Processed
~
1
C
S P O~ A N E C~ CJ N T Y
_ DEPARTMFNT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A D[VISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
T O: Rr~r, C ft1 ► ~►y~D~i►v~i~s~i~~~~ ~ ~1 '4610,011&lg
Jim Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities
Steve Holderby, Spokane Regional I-lealth District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair
Steve Worley, Stormwater Utility
Bill Hemmings, Development Engineering Services
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Valley School District No. 356
Fire District No. 1
Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner
v
DATE: March 10, 1997 ~
RC: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light
Industrial (I-2) zone.
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN 1ZFVIEW MEFTINC
MARCH 20, 1997 AT 1:15
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ls` FLOOR CONFTRENCE ROOM
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DES[GN REVIEW MEETING 1=QRM for your comments. The Division of Building and
I'lanning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have
been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments
on the attached form to Francine Shaw for the meeting. The attached APPI_ICAT(ON
ACCEP"I'ANCE AND DCSIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting
and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the
meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application,
please contact Francine Sliaw of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205.
c: Donwood, Inc. c/o Gordon Curry, 502 N. Glenn Road, Spokane, WA. 99206
Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANF, WASHINGTON 99260
IiuItowG PWONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
PLAtvtvtNc PHONF: (509) 456-2205 • Fax: (509) 456-2243
TDD: (509) 324-3166
' . ,
Design Review for March 20, 1997 at 1:15 p.m.
Zone Reclassification for ponwood, Inc.
Generally located north of and adjacent to Appleway, south of and
adjacent to the irrigation canal, approximately 1/3 mile east of the
intersection of Appleway and Barker Road in the S W'/4 of Section 17,
Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service
Area (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Light Industrial (I-2) for those uses allowed in
the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
PARCEL NUMBERS: 55173.0511
SITE SIZE: Approximately 4 acres.
APPLICANT: Donwood, Inc.
c/o Gordon Curry
502 N. Glenn Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
(509) 928-0600
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Francine Shaw
• • 4 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATI4N APPLI(AMNcouNYY
MAR 31997,
PART I
• DIVISIdN dF HUfl.DlNtJ AND Pt,Ar1NING
A. GrNT;RAI, INI+'ORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE:
MAILING ADDItESS: /v 0 (ex, .n CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PHONE: (work) (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT 4WNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION I'OR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
P20JECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) •
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLEn (acres or sq. ft.) p~>
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED,
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTAIILISHED) ~ ~
, - ,~wrU
EXISTING :ISE OF PROPERTY /1ou. iev S l ~ ~7
, .
PROPOSED ZONING oZ ,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOI. DISTRIC'I'
FIRE DISTRICT ~
WATER PURVEYOR 12 S~9~/ck- 7"
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellinbs Duplexes MLIl.tifami dwellings
Manufactured homes nusiness ~ ~ndustrial Mixed Use
Ottler ( ) - Describe:
DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING
B. LFCAT,I7nNE RFCLASSII+ICATION Iv'FORMATI4N: r.,
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. 4/ &.~-Voe_JCI • . G: ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ SECTION .117 TOWNSHIP Ot ~ RANGE
NAME Or PUI3LIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: '
.
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON I'UBLIC ROAD:
, • a • v
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROP4SAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIALA YES O NO
NAME(S) Or ARTERIAL ROADS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICA DQN PROPOSEDy
9-- /l.~ ~ ~~►~l~ - ~?-f'~~~ ~ ~ t-~r d '
EXISTING ZONE(S) I.I I~ -:3 -S- TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_
FOR THE FOLI.OWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAM Y LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVII~E )BELOW. ~a ♦ ~ ~ 4- Q-~ ort ~ IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONl~LTIONS OT THE AR WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THi G% `
NPROPOS WARRA~NTED? ~y! _
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE P1ZOPOSED Z4NE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES? WAFACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE ItECLASSIFICATION? ~ ~ ~s~-
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? ~ -
~ C~ c~v ~ ~ ~ dt o, ~?yI. ~ C- ~~1.~°.s ,~7~r i ~~i~t ~1
/ ~
~ .
• t • A
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VEI2IFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD P2ELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFOR.E FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALLIFIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PRO ~TE C TIO ISTRIC~ NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HA~) I~AVE NOT')J BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER ItR'_14D FACILITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WTLL 8E DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME. '
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: „
/au.H F~ czF V, ~ . FIRE DISTRICT ATURFJTITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY AR r.F1~tENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS ~,~-AVEI-,) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS:
C CJ4 4n9 Al*~
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUREfrITLE DATE
COUNTY ENGINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: _
It - 7=ji~
~r'~--~_.
1 C CS yT "(p S GNATUItEII'I E DATE
L
COUNTY UTILITICS
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE~i1 (I-iAV ~ N\OT) EN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS [_b►J .~jr-~.UF~ ~-P Ar-
A. COMMENTS: C ovr a -l -4L W, r ~ Nc -e •
L- 2 ~:Jr= ~1 /-7
~
~ SIGNATURFITITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT _
~
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE ANl?Z- RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE~-,---(HAVE NO BEEN SATISFI -D.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATUREITITLE ( DATE ,
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY 7n. APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~e- ~-e- r r-`e uJ u S,o--
/
_)L
~ ~3IGNATUREfI'1TLE DATE ,
,
' • • M
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4
PART III
C. py SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
oF w
A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
E ZONTN AP AND WRI DESCRIPTION.
17678 DATE:
, .
Ll.~rtD S: N9csi ~Z-~o►-'~.y3~2i~ PHONE: ~Z.co ~ i3`Z~Z,
-y ' ~ATE ~--ZIP: ~ 'Z'
-
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFTRM THAT T AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFTED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISlHER
BEHALF.
NAME: DATE: AD -/O l y/.,-
ADDRESS: PHONE:
ZIP:
U '
~
~ SIGNAURE OF APP~.~ICANT OR PRESENTATNE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS I n /10 9-16 DAY OF
i
W•
J•••• ~j, .
NO}'AR~cs'~9Q~f~Y
PUBUC i Z~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
~e.••~0~• Residing at: -ap dj4q
n ,~~~••'y 0 ,My appointment expires: 7/
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING)
DA
TE SUBMITTED: EA-V-C'~~/ C] FILE DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
. , ~
' r • 1 OO
As . •
~
l~
~
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
.
A. GENERAL IN)FORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE:
MAILING ADDRESS: Ua ~ CITY: STATE: ~ ZIP: ~ ~l aZ0 ~
PHONE: (work) ~yS'•~~•~- (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
,
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) •
ADJACENT AREA lJWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECTlPROPOSAL
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED)
C21~61'~-
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY C.~ f~ ~~i ~ S~. •e S
PROPOSED ZONING orZ .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY
SCHOOL DISTRICT V •
FIRE DISTRICT ~
7' eI~_~d
WATER PURVEYOR
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings ( ) Duplexes ( ) M ' ' dwellings { )
Manufactured homes Business ~ ~ndustrial Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
LIST PF.EVIOUS PLANNING
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATIQN INFORMATION:
~ d.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Z7---5 57-
`D
SECTION ' TOWNSHIP RANGE Z/
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS:
. ~
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD:
~0~ ~
~ ~t
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTION OF T~E APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRI('bIC~-
B. ADEQUATE ARR.ANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NO' '``~O_MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM h
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECOMMENDED FTRE FLOW: ;
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINTTIVE; AND WILL BE DE"
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: ^
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUI i-
S
WATER PURVA. SATISFACTORY A . ENTS FOR DOMEST
REQUIREMENTS AVE (HAVE NOT)
B. REQUIREMENTSICOMMENTS :
~
~ ~~1.5vlq '~D , '
WATER DISTRICT SIGNATU ITLE DATE
COUNTY ENGINEEIt L*
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
tt - 7 `I
.
Co/I S GNATURE/TI E DATE ,
COUNTY UTILITIES
~
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE)rr (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FCit THIS SITE IS
A. COMMENTS:
/-7 A ~
SIGNATURFJTITLE DATE
~
HEALTH DISTRICT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREIviENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY T APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: l~
- SIGNATURPn'ITLE DATE ,
i
RECEIPT SUMNAR.'
f ' 1- •~r .
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9602030 DATE: 11/07/96
APPLIGANT: DONWOOD, INC PHONE=
ADDRES3: 502 N GLENN RD
SPOKANE WA 99206
CONTACT NAME: DONWOOD, INC PHONE=
TRANSACTION: REZONE (ENGS), I.AND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCLTMENT ID : 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
CONiMENTS: PARCEL N0.55173.0511
(2) CHECK(3). NOS.1656 & 1658
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
REZONE REVIEW 1 25.00
TOTAL DUE ~ 225.00
TOTAL PAID= 225.00
BAI.ANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
11/07/96 00012029 1658 225.00
PROCES3ED BY: WENDEI,, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU ******tr*****************************
PER.MIT CENTER PASSPORT
Uatc: Number: iC~(J
Namc ? Phone
Address
Comments: ,
, . . ~ _
CUSTOMER ROUTING
.
.
Division of Building & Planning Division of Building & Planning s
. . . . . . : . ::.:::::::r:
.:.1•:.:1..1 . . J.... . . • • - J. 1....... t.l 1Y::::.~f:~'.......•.•........ . ...y1'.•''.'
. . . . . . . ....n {w:: . :w... .r :w::::.: :::4i::::::::.iC i.^?ti:ti~i::r::::::::~'~}:::::;r:~}::•: ~7::
. .:w: :~,1i r'r.~::: .ti.:4f.,v,~.v.: . • • 'b ..tinL
..v. t.; . . . v.Ly}.v:{.:: v.: v}::.;; :2:.~::: .w:
. v .b . . . ti ~ . . , y~ ;
1 Y1S1 .•ti` :ti•::~•:::::::::1.'{~•.'}.•::~:•: ' '.t • . . :.f. ....,.V'::::'ti:•:. .•:::1~~~::.~.~? :~1~ C• ]j]~/~('~/~~ •:.1.•:f•:.ti:
~ ~ •::::.1•: • ' Y.ti'J!.•.•.~ ..}.•W. M:VYSA•1.~IN.Y.{~•.:': ~.~~1.~ f~•:
.#G;S~~tYA1tt::~•::.:::::;:;:~.::.::•:}::«:<.::<:.;~: ~:~~~~1!i~E~.:~~~f~1n~::::: ~
. . . . - . . .
~ Addressing ~ Admin. Exception ~ Approach Pennit
~ Building Pennit ~ Arterial Rd Plan Info i Flood Plain Pennit
Code Infonnation Binding Site Plan Info : Public/Private Roads
Commercial Review Cert. of Exemption s Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
~ Conference Comprehensive Plan s Site Drainage Info
Energy Code Info : Cond. Use Pennit • . i Subdivision Review
~ Fire Safety Review ~ Nonconforming Use = Utility Permit
Manufactured Home Permit Review = Zone Change Review
Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info
Other Perniits Shon Plat Info NO FEE REQUIRED
;.~-Reviewer , Time out
Plumbing Permits i Subdivision lnfo
: _ fi;. • - ~ ~ ti•:
~',:.ti~' . 3:~: v
y.: •.::ii::~,1{'} • ::...:..::Yr~'.{.:: . +%Sk
• ;~fs... {r::
Private Road Info Temp. Use Permit {:.'~~::`:'~~:"f•:: •
Residential Review Variance Appl. ~ APA Paymeni
Sewer Permics Zane Check = Cert. of Exemption
tnformation , Zone Info ~ Subdivision Review
UL • /Sewer Info •
:
•
/ Zone Change Review,
C
. ~a _
iVO FEE REQUlRED ~ NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewcr Time out Reviewcr Time out Reviewer Time out
MAS7L'R1E'ASS('ORI.CTR 2JI6t'96 ~
~ ~ ~ 'r~"~._ ~ il~{ ~ * ~`.r.+... t~:., ~r ~/7~'~y
~ s ,~,ra • ' 'i., *H P~ + ~ ~ ~r `~y t w, ~ ~
y.~ ..a.~.: . t. ti.' ♦ • ~ ~ ~ ~fjr~ ~`~"y~ i ,;ryp:.,, ~"t-.~ h'.. ~ . r ~ FF'• '+"i - ~ - ~ ' ~ +s~ r
d~. .~i - ~ . . ~ ~ , ~ - ~ ~ ~
~~+P~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~
. ~ . . ~ ,
' - r ~ t 'A', , t : +.s+"~ 'r ~
4 ~ ' ~ ~ ",.....J~~* ~ - ~~;r
~ . • w ~ ~
. ~ ~ ' e t ~ , F l~.+'.i. ~ ~
, . n a ~ , •f • . r ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~"i► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~;M
. s . i ' . ~ .a ~ ~ . y y ~ . ,
~ ~ • e ` ~ A ~e.+~2 ~ ~
. ~ ~ . ~ ; ~ , f
k> r ~ . ~ ~ ~ i ~ s }
. ~ ~ ~ , ~ • * ✓
• , s* ' ' r ~ ~ , , r . .
~ . ~ ,
, ~
• . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' . *
. '
~ ~ ~
~ , , ~ . ~ .
~ ~ .
ti ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ j~ , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 4 ~ ♦
~ ~ a ~ _ _ ~ ~
M ~ ~ i - - /1~ ~ , ~/N' . - ~ f1 ' 'r .
~ ~ ' f 5 ~ ~ ~ r +G I ~',~o
~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ e~c+~ . ~ , ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
1 r ~ ~ / ~ • ~ d~ ~P _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~r I ~ ~
G If . .E I ~ ~ , , . , ~Ot 10 ~ , , !0'~ ~
, ~ ~ ~,x : r!~ ~i3.S ~,~1'~ ~ , ~ r . ~ - 3102 ~1 , , I ~ 4*~' ~ ~ _ a►~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ _ . ~t
~ 3~ t _ • ~ , ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~L~u~+d►~ = o~ 9~
~ . I ~ c~ ~i' + l~++~ r. , ~ . L'~'t,5' ,~'k ~ ~ UI~' ~ C~+Jt~ t ~,~,t, ~a~
, . . ~ -i ~ . ~11~, ! C ~ ~c+t c~ ~ ~ , ~ J , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R . . ~ . . ~ . ~
_ . . U , ~ ~ C N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • . ~ ~ ~
. s p~' i - ~ ~
, ~ , ~ _Y ~ . ~ ~1 ,~t+a[~t
9~6'~ ~ P~ I , # ~ fi ; ft
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ~~1~i~G ~ l44 ~ ~ ~ s~«+ ~NC~ ~ ~ tt ~ ~ ~ t~ BI~f~ t~ 2'1 ~
G~~ - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ :
~ ~ , ~ ~ . ,
~ ~ r/' _ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~
~ N ~ - . ~ . "
` Jy ~~r ~r~, • ~ a' / A ~M• ~
.Ir 'i~~►..~t GEFi~~li~,~'1'~ ~ . ,r~ tL~l~.~i'1~'~
3 ~ • ` -7 U, - - . ~ - ' -ry__ ~1,~G1 O~ _~v' ^ LrH1 siLVV - ^ • II
~ • ~ . f - - ~ 4"'
e o1 ~ ~ ~ ,Cp-~' ' • ' ' ~
~
~ °
:
Z C a-* Q l d ATn~r~o AV~. f`i° 2280 0
~ .
~ ' I ~
S. H. Np.
~-?-o- • ~ p Ul o
O I • o o r^ .,o
f
i N
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ • I J ~f ~
R02v/~!,rDWAY AVE. SLort-/ce Road
~
'•DY~ ~i [.~-t~¢o.t_~YIrJ .LC~Cjo! , ~
~ ~ t i~ - ~ q^ ! ` O
~ ~ ~ F - ' ~ , f ` til 1 ~ r r r- i ~ .
~ ~ ~ ( rL ' : ~ ~ _ . ~ I,J4'jGn ~-ui ~y ,•r
Y ~ ~ ' ( ~ •,~;,R' ~ i~` I L
3 '~r ~ :;r ~ • - i ~ ~ 0 23 ►
4 ~ A ~ •'YL G.. "!'f
c] io' ~ qG' ' ~;f•Y•l i L +r ~ . _
( 168~ _ s~~
ALr-cI t'n.
IL9
9
v R 0= t
+ ! _ ~1 - a , 44
. j
r i , , - ; - ` T ~ .'S , ri ,1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ p► , . E ~ ~ Q
` i;... ; ; : ~ e .i . . ~a d(;
t
• , : ~ ~ • Z
13 r• ~ /T' r : •
_ . .1 1 I/ / • • ~0► • ~.ir' ~ . 1 ~d Ul~
= j~
r• ~i a ~ J , d ~ ~l' 4!
1 k
>~o ~ 4
~'L
h 4 ~S - ~•t ~ ,B ~ = xs } I~R 3q6 51 =8
~l ~ ! • ' ' ~
, ~ ~i ~ I►~ ~s •3 - •:t~" ' / a ~ Q
,y
, . I ' ~ - 1,:~ ; ,s ~ a a j , s s a ~ ~ 3
~ r" ~ . ~ ~ r ~ •t. ,y.A il ~ 1!' ~ S. • `,1~~; / ~
}.I
1S% L 10 c~ 3 ~2 ' S ' I (
T2 ` C~ / ~ • : • ' - "Zo L! 7'l 27 2f 1. S, +
f '~r-•.~, .,r a :a~ • ~ ~ ,,i ~y y • ~1:.1
Jo ~~.}~1.: j'•:+~` r Ij ; ~2 1 t~~~ ' `7 ~ V` ~
' 'i Y 6 r
vr.tLE ~ : ~ ~'J ' ' v 7
~ w sfQ , a ~ s' ~3 ~ ' ~ Io
' .~t. s•~ Iv . . • , ~ 7 : ~
; : ;;;~'I 1 . . 9 d~ 37 ` ~o ~r ~Z ~ li N y-• Z ~ ~
. l - y . N
y t::j• z 2c-rr za ~
:s~ ~;••=1 „ z• M l N AVi/~
i • f 3 ? . ~ ~3
~ ~ T! n • tiG ; ~ ' n : -
~ i l~ ^B • J7 •'f•' 7 i • ; .rv : :t~~' ` ~ ~ wer. ssc.~. .
:
ID ~ J • ~7 ~ s • G1
00 14 ; ~s . ~ 2 ~ • C~ Z ~
Z is- ic ~~7 iy:•, v S'`~
; ( V
,f . ~ . < <
` - - - &7~ i • s t ~
. I ~ , „ e.s , ~ ! Q 4 ` 1 v'.`
, t ~ ~ ~ .p s 4~ 3 ~ ~
-j U
• ' ~ • r /t! i 1 a~ 23 7* 26' ~ r-- , ~
~ ' , ~ . . • • . -
/ 7
. J' - -~T ~s ~ • rz`= U F'4
. ,4 b . . - - ~ - ~ - - - _
~ ( ~ ` J • :::~~,Ci-,,~i,r-~3'~'.. _ , . - ' J .-c~ ~P ~yv c.
dowL ~
CO'E.'.. 900K /YE
.
~
~ _SE. c fa ~ _ ~ y 9 X 9 ~X .z i✓. ~,s ~r .,~a. ~z ~ . ,Y s~:° ~ o f v fs ..~'6 ~ a~
~ .~°-►l.S=~ . /1~E.Go.- ii _ /G X 1..~. ~X ~ o~~ fo.~ - ~'rf./ac.i~:~„ •fi~.ta - F,~ v-• ' • -
A 1
' I
~
( • ~
~
~
a i . 17 . 16
O
AVENUE 1 O 4 `
~
I -
NE C I . PPCifIc ~
ALKI AVENUE ~
ZONE B
aoA° ' .
r ~ ~ • o
' p
°
AVENUE W
SP GUE z
, `N
~ ~z
0
,
. ~ . ;
a oc
w
C• Y -
cc ~
, Q
m I
2
C
0
~
~
21
- lg 20 -
,
.
A;7/1~5n
. ~ .
~
~
Z i
l II W I
, I~ ,
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Y1Y7"'~Yl~~A""
1
3
rv~.
{
R
w„
"
n" i
' $ r
s.~
„ ''.j Kea.
'"1: ,...i. ~ lRE dta$»" "mss" . . „ ; ~.~,:,~.x~.a: ~ „ a gar °
~"f
F~
4
k
'r rx x r"d~:w.y4, y x rp `.~.:3a"vr'~r"rv ~ w".1...: M.`Wn~P '.x
„ „ "w
1 ~
wx x . r~'.:.
wr'
~y b X . x„ ~n
~ , : „
„ . ~ „ s . „ d„
,~:s s• „
„
,p „
„ ,
„ ,
of "
s
y µ
p ' 44
: ro.:ra. x . .
~
E ~ .
p k
i
.k
s
s I
F a
}
, . ,
I
n
{
J
;t .
~~:,i
~ ` ~
t
t • ~ t < ~ .il
~ 3 _ ! ~ ~ E. t
~
~ j
~ ~ I
g
~x