Loading...
ZE-142-77 & ZE-142A-77 ~3 . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO : ZE-142A-77) SPOKANE COUNTY • HEARI NG EXAMI NER C OMMI TTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. I NTRODUCTI ON This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on October 3, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being F. Lynn Tennican, Chairperson, J erry williams and Ron Odell. 6 . P ROP OSAL The sponsor, Valley t s~oc-~~ , is requesting approval of a change of conditions, File N. ZE-142A-77,~to modify Condition of original approval wnich required sub tantial devel ent of the subject property by October 1 , 1985. The F p - 1 ' ant i s requesti ng a si x(6 ) year extensi on of time (to October 1, 1991) to allow the economy to support a regional shopping center. No other conditions relative to the site plan and land use are anticipated for change. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, churches, fire station, and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Major Corrmerci al and Suburban devel opment. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Commercial. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the proposed Shopping Center which addressed the potential impacts upon the area dealing with land use; change in _ character and compatibility, buffering, economics, alternative uses, increased traffic and accident potential, circulation patterns, noises, new light sources and aesthetics, access to the Freeway, air emissions, water and sewerage concerns, and inducement for more intensive land uses on adjacent properties. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda I tem have been ful fi 11 ed. . 1 r ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. 142A-77 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 7. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 8. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) The request for a time extension is consistent with the original Regional Shopping Center concept. 2 ZONE CNANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APP ROYAL (Al1 Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT l. That a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be required to review detailed site development plan(s) as well as a SEPA Determination made by the Planning Department prior to application for any building permits on the subject property. 2. That at the public hearing required in #1 above, the Hearing Examiner Committee may modify, delete or add to the existing conditions as contained within the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated July 16, 1979, and those mitigating measures as identified within the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for this proposal except as may be modified by ttie Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated July 16, 1979. 3. That if approval is granted, the conditions of the original . approval shall apply to this extension of time. 4. That in the event a detailed site development plan and SEPA Determination has not been submitted for review by the Hearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing by October 1, 1991, then and in that event a hearing shall be held by the Hearing Examiner Gommittee to consider either a time extension or changing the zone classi'fication back to Agricultural. 5. . That prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee for review of said site development plan(s) and SEPA Determination, the applicant shall provide a legal description prepared by a licensed surveyor. 6. That the following are conditions that may be added to the proposal by the Hearing Examiner Committee at the above-stated public hearing and now serve as information to the applicant. 3 ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DENARTMENT Revised Conditions Nos. 14, 159 16 and 17: 14. Right of Way and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. It is agreed that an additional fifth lane (two-way left-turn lane) shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project si te. Spokane County wi 11 proceed wi th the construction of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broadway including acquisition of additional right of way required for the fifth lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinafter specified. 2. The Developer shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of the additional right of way required and likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of constructing the additional width required to provide the fifth lane operation. 3. The Devel oper slial l rei mburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to State of Washington's South ri ght of way 1 i ne of SR 90. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lane on the approach to Broadway shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Transition in width may be required south of Broadway Avenue. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway from SR 90 to Broadway Avenue including any transition in width required south of Broadway Avenue and al so i ncl udi ng acqui si ti on of addi ti onal ri ght of way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. : 4 ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142a-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and a lef t-turn lane on the approach to Sullivan Road and with a dual left-turn lane at the principal entrance to the project shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway from Sullivan Road to the east property 1 i ne of the project i ncl udi ng tne transi ti on of wi dth east of the east property line and also including acquisition of additional right of way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified, . 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer sha11 reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. . 6, Roadway improvements to Broadway shall include curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channelization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the Mall. 7. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acquiring ten feet of right of way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue south for one hundred- f i fty feet (150' ) to a poi nt of zero wi dth and for the necessary reconstruction of Conklin at the Broadway Avenue intersection. 8. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Val 1 ey Mal l traf f i c i nto the res i denti al areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Val 1 ey Mal 1 devel opment wi th requi red tapers. An additional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. 5 ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DENARTMENT (continued) 15. Traffic Signals - The Developer's share of the cost of improvement or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percent of traffic generated by the Va11ey Mall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Sprague . Sullivan and Mission Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadway and the major Va11ey Ma11 entrance 0.6 (the total cost by the developer) Future Parti ci pati on. Traffi c generated by the Val l ey Mal 1 may necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall deveiopment east to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections fromn future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. There shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access road as shown on the development plan submitted with this application and approved by the County Engi neer, or as approved by the County. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of interim on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to objectby the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. P ROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6 ,r ~ a ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made when it is available. d) COUNTY HEALTH DI STRICT 1. We request a change of conditions (of approval) if this project is granted its request. Specifically, that the project be connected to a public sewer, and that on-site sewage disposal system(s) not be allowed. We cite section 1.04.090-(3) of Spokane County Rules and regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems: "If the distance between the premises to be served and an adequate public sewer is greater than 200', and if the anticipated sewage flow is greater than 1,000 gallons per day, connection shall be made thereto if the Health Officer determines that a connection is feasible and such connection is permitted by the sewer utility owner/operator or sewer district." e) C OUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. Due to the sensitive storage requirements over the Aquifer, and this site lies within the Waste Water Management area, we feel that some language should address the possible storage of fl angnabl e or cri ti cal materi al s wi thi n these structures. 4. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 5. Building permits will be required for each structure. 7 : t ' 7 ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY OEPARTMENT (continued) 6. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be installed prior to any construction. These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04 of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of the water service. A11 required fire protection facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. f) COUNTY AI R POLLUTI ON CONTROL AUTHORITY (NO COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, ) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Valley Mall Associates, for a change of conditions as described in the application should be APPROV ED for an Extension of Time for a si x(6 ) year peri od to OCTOBER 1, 1991. Motion by: Odell Seconded by: Williar~is Yote: Odell - Ay+e Williams - Aye Tenni can - Aye Unanimous to APPROYE the Extension of Time for a six (6) year period to OCTOBER 1, 1991 -(3 - 0) 8 J / ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS NO. ZE-142A-77 E. ORDER (continued) HEARI NG EXAMI NER COMMI TTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE ~ ` ' \ . / %i ~ L"'1 a4,A1" p 1"LS-011 . ~ ~ • f r 1 ~ . ' ~ . ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director ~ &-ORO4BIOWSKI By S E E P. Zoning Administrator , Date. ~ I Fl5 . 9 sy~ ~ . : . , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.:', ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEARI NG EXAMI NER COMMI TTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on October 3, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being F. Lynn Tenni can, Chai rperson, J erry Wi 11 i ams and Ron Odel 1. B. P ROP OSAL The sponsor, Valley Mall Associates, is requesting approval of a change of conditions, File No. ZE-142A-77, to modify Condition of original approval which required substantial development of the subject property by October 1, 1985. The applicant is requesting a six (6) year extension of time (to October 1, 1991) to allow the economy to support a regional shoppi ng center. No other condi ti ons rel ati ve to the si te pl an and 1 and use are anticipated for change. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, comnercial, churches, fire station, and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for • Major Commercial and Suburban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application i s Comnerci al . 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared for the proposed Shopping Center which addressed the potential impacts upon the area dealing with land use; change in character and compatibility, buffering, economics, alternative uses, increased traffic and accident potential, circulation patterns, noises, new light sources and aesthetics, access to the Freeway, air emissions, water and sewerage concerns, and inducement for more intensive land uses on ad,jacent properties. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 1 . ZONE CNANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. 142A-77 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 7. The Hearing Examiner Conmittee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 8. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee: a) The request for a time extension is consistent with the original Regional Shopping Center concept. : 6 2 . . . A ZONE CHANGE OF C ONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROYAL (All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Nearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 1. That a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be required to review detailed site development plan(s) as well as a SEPA Determination made by the Planning Department prior to application for any building permits on the subject property. 2. That at the public hearing required in #1 above, the Hearing Examiner Committee may modify, delete or add to the,existing conditions as contained within the Board of County ' Commissioners' Findings and Order dated July 16, 1979, and those mitigating measures as identified within the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for this proposal except as may be modified by the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated July 16, 1979. - 3. That if approval is granted, the conditions of the original approval shall apply to this extension of time. 4. That in the event a detailed site development plan and SEPA Determination has not been submitted for review by the Nearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing by October 1, 1991, then and in that event a hearing shall be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to consider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural. 5. That prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Comnittee for review of said site development plan(s) and SEPA Determination, the applicant shall provide a legal description prepared by a licensed surveyor. 6. That the following are conditions that may be added to the proposal by the Hearing Examiner Committee at the above-stated public hearing and now serve as information to the applicant. 3 ZONE CNANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Revi sed Condi ti ons Nos. 14 , 159 16 and 17 : 14. Right of Way and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. I t i s agreed that an addi ti onal fi fth 1 ane (two-way left-turn lane) shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the proj ect s i te. Spokane County wi 11 proceed wi th the construction of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to . Broadway including acquisition of additional right of way required for the fifth lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinafter specified. 2. The Developer shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of the additional right of way required and likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of constructing the additional width required to provide the fifth lane operation. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the . above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. B. Sullivan Road from 8roadway Avenue to State of Washington's South ri ght of way 1 i ne of SR 90. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lane on the approach to • Broadway shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Transition in width may be required south of Broadway Avenue. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the wi dened roadway from SR 90 to Broadway Avenue i ncl udi ng ar~y transition in width required south of Broadway Avenue and also including acquisition of additional right of way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. 4 ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) C. Broadway Avenue East of Sul l ivan to the East Property Line of the Pro3ect. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and a left-turn lane on the approach to Sullivan Road and with a dual left-turn lane at the principal entrance to the project shal l be requi red prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. 2. Spokane County wi 11 proceed wi th the constructi on of the widened roadway from Sullivan Road to the east property line of the project including the transition of width east of the east property line and also including acquisition of additional right of way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified. ~ 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. 6. Roadway improvements to Broadway shall include curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channelization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the Mall. 7. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acquiring ten feet of right of way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from 6roadway Avenue south for one hundred fi fty feet (150' ) to a poi nt of zero width and for the necessary reconstruction of Conklin at the Broadway Avenue i ntersecti on. 8. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley Mall development with required tapers. An additional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. 5 - ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 15. Traffic Signals - The Developer's share of the cost of improvement or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percent of traffic generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadway and the major Valley Mall entrance (the total cost by the devel oper ) 16. Future Partici~ ation. Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessitate t~ie wi'ening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall development east to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Developer shauld be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections fromn future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. There shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access road as shown on the development plan submitted with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of interim on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Heal th Di stri ct and i s further condi ti oned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) propertyand further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. P ROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6 • . ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Ary water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made when it is available. d) COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT l. We request a change of conditions (of approval) if this project is granted its request. Specifically, that the project be connected to a public sewer, and that on-site sewage disposal system(s) not be allowed. We cite section 1.04.090-(3) of Spokane County Rules and regulations for Sewage Disposal SysNGl11S • r "If the distance between the premises to be served and an adequate public sewer is greater than 200', and if the anticipated sewage flow is greater than 1,000 gallons per day, connection shall be made thereto if the Health Officer determines that a connection is feasible and such connection is permitted by the sewer utility owner/operator or sewer district." e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible- and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. Due to the sensitive storage requirements over the Aquifer, and this site lies within the Waste Water Management area, we feel that some language should address the possible storage of fl anmabl e or cri tical material s wi thin these structures. 4. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 5. Building permits will be required for each structure. 7 . .R ~ ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT (continued) 6. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be installed prior to any construction. These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175 feet fram the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04 of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of the water service. All required fire protection facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. f) COUNTY AI R POLLUTI ON CONTROL AUTHORITY (NO COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. ) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Comnittee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Yalley Mall Associates, for a change of conditions as described in the application should be APPRON ED for an Extension of Time for a six (6) year period to OCTOBER 1, 1991. • Motion by: Odell Seconded by: Williams Vote: Odell - qye Wi 11 i ams - Aye Tennican - qye Unanimous to APPROVE the Extension of Time for a six (6) year period to OCTOBER 1, 1991 -(3 - 0) 8 , • ~ ..Y M ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 E. ORDER (continued) + HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO TNE ABOYE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE . ' . r r r r ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director ~ ~s w lBy P. HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator . . Date: 9 ' ~ . J J* ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Revi sed Condi ti ons Nos. 14, 15, 16 and 17: 14. Right of Way and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. It is agreed that an additional fifth lane (two-way , 1 eft-turn 1 ane ) shal l be. requi red pri or to the C Aime that - 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Spokane County will proceed with the construction ofa five-laneroadway from Sprague to ~ Broadway including acquisition of additional right of way requi red for the fi fth 1 ane. Spokane County shal 1 fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinafter specified. 2. The Developer shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of the additional right of way required and likewise shall _ reimburse Spokane County for the cost of constructing the ~ additional width required to provide the fifth lane operation. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to State of Washington's South ri ght of way 1 i ne of SR 90. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lane on the approach to Broadway shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Transition in width may be required south of Broadway Avenue. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway.from SR 90 to Broadway Avenue including any transition in width required south of Broadway Avenue and also including acquisition of additional right of way V _ required for wideni*ng the roadway. Spokane County shall . fund the entire cost thereof subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. . 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of ~ construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer•shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. . ~9 f ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and a left-turn lane on the approach to Sullivan Road and with a dual left- turn lane at the principal entrance to the project shall b.e required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. 2. Spokane County wi 11 proceed wi th the constructi on of the .widened roadway from Sullivan Road to the east property line of the project including the transition of width east of the east property line and also including acquisition of additional-right of way required for widening tne roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject . to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter speci fied. . .°r . . _ , . . . . ~ . . .....is~ t.,: , r '"ri• ;.;i? : v. . . . : • . • . . , . 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said, additional lanes, 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the -above-described costs when said road improvements are cornpleted. 6. Roadway improvements to 6roadway sha11 include curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channelization at the Sullivan Road intersection.and the major entrance to the Mall. 7. The Developer sha11 reimburse the County for the cost of _ acquiring ten feet of right of way on each side of Conklin Road taperin from Broadwa Avenue south for one hundred ff - f ty feet (150' ) to a poi nt of zero wi dth and for the necessary reconstruction of Conklin at the Broadway Avenue i ntersecti on. 8. Special traffic flow channelization shaii be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through tne Val l ey Mal l devel opment wi th required tapers. An additional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Suliivan Road to Sullivan Road. - . ~ ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 15. Traffic Signals - The Developer's share of the cost of improvement or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percent of traffic generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway _ Broadway and the major Yalley Mall entrance (the total cost by the developer) 16. Future PartiWe ation. Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessi tate wi'--ni ng of Broadway Avenue from the Val 1 ey Mal 1 development east to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction . costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections fromn future phases of the project warrant said improvements. . 17. There shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access road as shown on the development plan submitted with this application and approved by the County Engi neer, or as approved by the County. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT • l. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of interim on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is fur.ther conditioned and subject to . specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Neal th Di stri ct. 2. The owner(s)'or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize tne County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Cnapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements cal 1 ed for i n conjuncti on wi th the formati on of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. - 1 . ~ ~ , ~ . • ~ ' ' ' • ~ • ' / ~ . ~ e . ~ar ! ~ • ~ ~ i 17 , ~j' I ~ t ! iz z y A i 1 Z reorG ~ , E„_•--~r~ . , ~/G I ~ ~ tZ <<rrU . . , 1 Z ~ L I.w~ F'rl~ . AjA ~ Z. Su ,~livss R°~'a t* ~,.90 . T~ pl . , SP=.Va bVe ~ 15g2 ~ r R •'p . 1) 4103 g. 303200~ . . , . tiaS ~ae 5• ~U,? Vf • ' . t 4 F~~ U- N~s~ ~ ~.s~ . ~ ~ . . , r , ~ 4 . ~ ~ . ~ ~ v . , 30 • i r IL ~ ~ i✓ " { / • / " zz , ~ i ~ ~ ~ r+a . , / 41_ J,~~j~GAClN~ . • - TDO . ' ' 0 . . N Sall. ~ X~i a lAQ . ~ 1 ` ~[G T /Q ~ sptt~ . CD ~ 1591 . ~ t . r YPf ~~03 t~~►~ $ .3432(4 ~ ~gpctiovL a°s ~~`C~' WASkt~":•a 't ~9 . , . , ~ _ - SSIOIiAl , 0 . ~ _ _ . ► . ~ _ FROM:CH2M HILL SEA 2064625957 T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:47PM #520 P.02 E WdO4 bII/t A3U V jop jeyi paAou ~c~ P n o~ s ~ • ~ c, 0`1 Ve. ~ suo,-~r~' d5 } a-t u 4t~ ~aUa ~r ~ dd 11 ~ • - . ~ ~ ~ t1~ p.43S Lg '04 5~0 UC~ G t tvit I dJ F. U i S ~ nI . 04 UO;J-~4 p ~(v o d ) uar,c~ u1 j q , • , ~ , PlAom Jts roVo1+>a~Jc-) UI o ~ ~~~c1~ t. a q t osl,~eva ~ d e.) Ua+t ~ wcl.~j (4JA wt` OA S'~ f , -4I~uo ~~c~ a nn'~I-~ua naa~uo) 'ovle ppe >ul1Q9~.~.n G~s . PO-H , a44. q, V r ~aejj S(41 1~ pvc a,~~~ C~ a N- U 1`► s jJpU(1 jUaWd~AOOJ j ~~Ou -A s« n~dJ 8 ~t Je c~ Q..LS Qu PUe 'POZ; ?cJuet, ~ Si Uo14~~o te UJn.~ u ~ c~ 1a ~ 4_, •voi~.~d:.jatu,i dtUe~ 4~noe.-. d~,~ . f a~G e o: e UCr ~tn ~~J ~t tovv ' 13 U a. I 0 ~ r'Wede'? J ~J a4 5 eUe ~SG ~Ud ati pe Msp aAeq a(V, • f,~►C~ f~; ~ f,~ c~.~o~ _ .e pipw ~n aw ~~oajp pVAoj4jno5, Pa4) 04 VIt joi.ao el UO,+ t ! pe Ue Punoj: •~-c id.~V<~ J I JNd u~; I nS dll JAIA~ ewd W nim G'Otie~U,~o~ Ut r Vve. ~ JnWov, 'am noaUpJJC-) dp4 "~-~u ~~u~.n otaj NJdA&5 J0~d ~.A jjt)~ . . t~ ~Q9 4~t~~. s~~~~ t~'.4~~ta a a4a C) C~j> t C~ pvnoj C~. ~'.V t~'.J~ f(1''•} 7'Lu S NUll~l . Jo~.4 dvip"), au. 01 se~rp1~ , ue ~)dr,.,~ u I 41,I ~aJ ~~~a~- ~ d lkac~ pu ~ ~ ~ v kejc- dL Cv ~ J N. ~~J ~ ~ ll vomojoji~.j ~ ~ P , (3DIdd0) 04 ~1.dd o) ~'-aN, d rd .n ~ (371.330) ' DoN 40et0iad ezep t9~Iddo1 I~~i~ao1 ~JVow LW ~ l(~uN~ : u1oa4~ ~ (3~Idd01 ~ ~ ~ N w~ o Yu 3 w • ~ FROM:CH2M HILL SEA 206462595? T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:47PM #520 P.03 C w60a tpelc n3a . v~ . / I✓• ! L" ` rl ~ 4+ 5 ~ U i~J a W p r . I+ 1) le: J WoJ~ U 0 ~ 1 > >aJt~ Uu~~ 411OU -4N5•r6-)au sil aut.) Nuo~~~ 1? a61. ue_ ..~e~ J&a(C& H Ul1 1 1 ,~J~~jI U~ V~C~Qu1 naS C~u ~0oF l,1a,narno ~ . ~ ~ . ~ C;)lAfin Q A i0 ~U I ~J vJ~ d v y ~ n a.~ , ~ ~ n pM C No 0 0 t ;J dqu I 3 ~e-. oJ J ~~1 ('4 ~~;C.~vZ>au o u sol uo1~j.-,~~! 541 tf t R. + M i~a ~ ~ + io 0p~ ~ uvl.~ F ~ ~ ~e U e JGi `,d.hV VCi e q~nAJy4 2 gL PVd..~X'd 0 P00S.4f(105 , o ~-p au e,~~ (4 T ~I ~r• ~ d V ~1• C-)(~ 1 ► ~ 1 1 rviu 40'~ C si ~,~uc 5!~ aL t?.*\ 'V v at.>'l C).. 5dWU U, ~ r) c~~~ LAj 4 eV t 10 or, ~u C) e a ~j a tii 0 o (t ~ I J\ j v l ~ u*) 1 5p d ;)L~c 5lto~ e.~adQ c~,jNJ~~~t,.~n5 "'"N ~ ► J ~ ~ ~ ► . :ea (377d~0) ' ' 'ON 4043fO4d : A~eQ ca~~~~o1 (a~~ddo1 • : woa:f 13~i~do1 ~ - WnGIV dUO W3LA1 ~ . : o.~. FROM:CH2M HILL SEA 206462595? T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:48PM #520 P.04 S' 1!-1 6600T ~ :)/(1 (q6A/a0S) /L'lba :MO11.33S2i3l.MI w.rr~r~~r.....~~~~...~.«...~... ....•a u .~..u...n.«..~.~.....~.. n....~~.~.~. ~ 9 yurG x6620 i 3 01,91• J 8',61 S/TwU 609'0 1 gS ki c"T 9R910 6`2.'0 J * * ~ ~k LTG 1.:4/'1 .1 iA N G°E3f 01 8 T ltc•,0 99/...'0 l 81 S07 'ddd 11t1"'1114. "'Adv SU"t ),b'1::3(f 113l9 3/A 'd-49 :3NV"1 J-o 'ED►,3-~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ N..~ T• 11~ IH nYI Y1~ ~ r... ~ r.. w. ~ r ~ r.~ w~. ~ ~ ~ «w • ir ~ . . • . . ~u ~r~ ~ ~ IP .J r. ti Q"0 010 0' V 0' 0 ffio...l'.t;fA 010 090 4" 0 G' b n10'"I'13J1 . 000 U`0 4' 0Z 00~ X ra~3 3>_4 C1 010 020 t>' 0 0102 ta33d9 X X (1d X Qld 1-~ 1~j X X N1. iij. X.f )3 4.; .11 H m X a J X (114 X ld .1. X H.J. X tIJ .11 ►J,1q X ,I `i 93 b•-Hd ;;;--NcI Z-Nc3 T ••41d U-'hld (4•-•Hd Z-i-1d 1-I1.3 0' 5-'9 ~ 11.10h1.3"1 313,kJ ~,~Ji~l7:1..t :~f~► ~1~I~f~:?I5 14 0J 061' 0 U 0 N 00' Z 0000 HS ~ 91e rr 02 .06M0 u o N a()*Z oo•o 8N G v 14 06°o 0 0 14 ao-;: 0010 aM r_ t-1. a c Z" ra or, 06"0 0 0 N 00°z 0040 03 j t~~w N/A Qls WN IV/A M «s.no ° cr.~.a sti:g ,a _ua,a S3s(*)Ei [)N,J rad AH 3(IeN9 S8013VJ 11V1141.Sii0aV 0'uT 0'z1. 08~fi 0"2t = a•LT o°ZIt a•Zx ~~~;!*i ~ 0'ZT .t. 4';;T 01 i.l 06z1' ~ G 0 t~ G 0 a -Ij 0'zT J. 0"c',1 `i '1 00~1 ~ 0 M'. 0 U 18 a"I"wl T I o°G1 J. 0 `1 0•j1: "ti : btG I 9ebt o 0 N.I. o ° zx -l ~ PF"f J. u 6 I ?~.r.. I c~ . I 69e. o 0 10C .1. A ki N gm R:A ~ as . arq )jm 93 i1103 r) S314fi'lf.111 ~ 1031''O8d H.l.Tffl +,;661• " . ° . . ..ll~1~~fJ1~lEi;1 a r r► r r±,~~'q ~ t 1QCI 60 r ..r r . . r . ' JJ.UV ~Iqj ` ° . . « • « 1 iA 1v1atJ (Ik1.) . 0 . . . V 1.5 NVl1):'1"lilSlEl-AM (03) .l. W)d1i A,"D1•114IlS 5Mf.l I.1 JJ1.5?~ 31M J. (FRT-i:{Nf.l IS 2td:JF3 E3fi i , FROM:CN2M HILL SEA 2064625957 T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:48PM #520 P.05 ~l - S 0'1 t66"0 J/A (4En/:)O,) 8~~~:7, =Nor.1„)a1,3431NI . _ _ - . .w.,...,.....- a.._...a _ M..~ w ,...,.,...r.. _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 IEe'0 .1. Q b°01 (S b"t,~~: 1 "G e,08'0 8 5 t~ 1"'( 15, z L.'0 OTr:'U %d Q s:' {)r: Q Q ° ~:E Ub' U 89011 .l kIN 3 0'4tU 3 0"UV Ybz'o 09610 ;)!(1 ' -Iy9 3I1V"1 S01 ° ciAti Aw13Q ° .~•3b ~!J"1 ~tl1:~U 0/9 ~::11~ t1?~_=15 Jtl "13/1T! fi~C{ 1 13)l 0610 000 C/ 000 M),.I.l.a 000 0110 0*0 010 000 000 t?' Ub 0' l""I I433),19 b' U 090 0' 4 U' Uc.l. N -3 3 ~qJ x x. ~ x (1,4 X X I~.~. i41. X U5 1"1 q h1 x X x X Ef.t. X .I q{%l k 1 "1 V-Nd ::'°•W.a ~;...~9d ~_..fl:l bW.a ~:'--N,~ ZZ--~t.:.t ~-•N•~ p• rB ..RL;.1N31 3"]3.k;) frt:11111.135 "lti11011.4 w~ W' rA a ui r, rn ~ r.. •.w... ~ . . • . f... . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~w r.~ ~ . . .r r. N Ut. 06'0 d 0 114 (10 ~v 00°Q ~S ~ ~•v I`I Vid 0610 V V N VVrC ovr0 ~a•21 z 1.4 06~0 0 o N ou*<: oo1o ::f m 1Y J 0,6 r V 0 0 r`I V\'r l'r 1/0 1O kl.3 14 /,k (11S WEq Cq / t ) M UAl • 8yV • ItiG - a3d sa:~~a _allj sA s~~~~ ~~~d Paa t,ti 3adac) 4'c;X 0 6 8, v Orvi r;." F 0 nZ1 U•~ ~ ~ V rel } .1. V+zi \l • t'.Yi 1 0 ~ l i 1 ~ 0 0 n ~ C• ~ U " ~ ~ ~ 0 • C~ 04 :r 'f ~ 0 USw 0 0 o•Z T ~t aa4,X a•<~t. o~Iz T A ~ bT~V 98t?l o 0 tda_ Q'VT '1 0"i:'.1 a.. 0'C T 41.1."1 0't;1 ~I ~ 6 9 4 0 0 l0a 1"i iJg Ati 8M A ~{1 (4 U:4 J ~ S ~~1~111..i0l~ 1,1 ~~i'dyd HJ.IRi ~G61' " . ' ° " •1.1~~1~lfIC1J • r r. r•• 1 11 a.'} 7~. ~ s 1 661• 81-6Y • u • w a 11 b • V `1 •.•'~1,1,. r ~ u . r ..1.~~/~'..{~11'1~1 Q~~.~ • . . ~ . ~:~~.f, ~ 1 1~1~1t1:( ~~ililr►/~>y#l~1~1~ ( ~3:~ ) N.1 fi()~' `Mtly:a :3~5~1=11.IVI I }1{1,~ ~t! J. ~*,Idl,l1~11 E~; FROM:CH2M HILL SEA 206462595? T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:49PM #520 P.26 50 -1 92'K " 1: t !1 ( 4 an/ DaS) Ap F a ~ N b 11::1:4~ 8 3.1111 'I bOL U c, 0co 8 :1 - Q 2" 6 c: 615" 0 890' T 1 as N b'c Z9910 Lg'U .L Dl.0' t? e' T ' E "I OM ~ b' 3T ~a8 j'0 S /._'.U ~ :`."bl 60trI T 'q 91c..4 am 50'~ '~.~E! Ab`13(I '.3dV SUl I.tl13a J/A ' d239 3NEi"1 -131ri93S -40 ")3113"1 060 040 ° t? 0110 0,0 040 0,0 0' b MU'1"13A 000 V'Q C1'83 0`0 14 31~9 OlU 000 O~V 0*01 WIMO X Q:l K c1 t1 X P.1 x .1. 8 X M.1. 1,41 11 J ' 1 }I fb X X U•.4 X (C.-A 18 u X X IA.{. Vi.l X J. "1 O1'd 1. "t U s h.41,4 :....Hd T--lid V41,:3 12-1-18 ~:-•~~:i T-HJ 0 ' hs = N18141"1 313JI.I ~`Y1 N OZ UM"U G 0 tJ 00'1_: 0010 >!5 ~ L' 't 1 ta 006'0 N OO'F 1?U"O 8N ~ 0L'- (it, " f) 0 4 N 04' Z OU' G qm '2~ IJ bw Ob' 0 0 0 N 00 ' C~ 0020 g~ 1 tlTw NiA qiq Wht N/A W 3dAl "88N 'lflEI "(I.3d 5(l:il d .411.4 535C1a 9?I.4 1'UV I1N 3069 . . ~~C1.1.;7ts.~ 1.M3W1Sfii'UV OOt,Y 0°c.T 0*31 U`vT + 0"?T n"c;Y 067,1 0'zi 0'ZT ~ 0g 0 0 0 .yy U~vT 8 O'c T .l 4a ZT N 0"ZT • Ost~ 0 S8 0 18 n'ZT 1. 0'zi 08'u1 1 01 i l ~ l 96'L1 G 0 111 Q"z1 ,1. o'zY "I 0'?X I b'i;l' ~ 0 169 G61 0 1-1 ►1 s 9M gm 93 : as RN em >3 ~ 'k >j j ~1 11at) 3 ~ SBw(1"IfJA 1.0:1170,4d HIM S66t - . . JN3WWo_1 ~Icl" • • ' • • Y M '301. F 6{7 } -1:1 Y-.. CI u 6 r 0 r r a ■ • r . 31V\1 . "lhE • " • , • , • ° A"I dhf d QD3;1' . . . • 3,AA.! tl3JV Nt~rt~ ~~i~~:5-1Wk1~ tS(41 f~J.~IGti' 'IdflX l:)~I;>;:t~1.iNS 1.80.J:-44 AyV11114i1S ~~I;l11:,1 "1J5~~~.IN;t d:~xl:...It/NJX~3 »Ll:~li ~i3GY • FROM:CH2M HILL SEA 2064625957 T0: 1 509 624 8582 SEP 18, 1991 3:49PM #520 P.07 J = -S 01 9 ~7, 0`1 :1/fi (tpn/Dafi) 0`wz - AvYoQ ~Nt.►11.J~S 6 :3lIq I , . 609°0 089`0 y bLTt"0 01.4"E 1. a5 v 6"O 918'0 QWQ ,1 J 1-~Oi,. 3 6 r1.d~ i_GZ*O C79V• T 1 OIT Q Z"Br i'60`0 Z91`0 'ti1 U S L. Q zyl 'L.'._ Z6010 E3fl, I'."0 "I aM SO"1 ' ca~;iV Jld13Q ' -Adt! wtl'y !001:M 3/9 3/A ".:fy1S:l 3tJVI .ry;1 J, r1 `{3S J0 "1311:J"1 080 460 b'U 010 Mt?..1..1:aA U'o 080 U"(f b"v M01111 000 080 000 U"ya N3 -4.119 ()"U 0`0 000 0`8 113 IN-4 0 X Q.3 X. Q ti-1 X .R ~I . X N.J X H1 171.1, .1,."1 aS k J.,'1 Hri X X (I i X 0•..;l ,1 Ili .l, 8 X X Yl.l Hl X 171 )aN l.l 93 ('-H-4 %-H~4 I - H.:1 , 0°!-8 - N.U;)NY'.i 3"13A.3 S91'41:113a '1t11~#~~XS tT hI UCt, 06"0 U Q N 00 00°0 )AC C11 M OG 66 °G 0 A h1 ()f)''C: 00'0 HN ~ qwff/ M 0 C? 040 1 0 d 0 14 C*1 06,10 i1m ~~~.fi \/l'r 1/1 r 1I U Q t7 0011 00*0 93 I ulw tJiA qN WI4 N; A :3r.1,11. ";.IJN ' 1 fld 203.4 S(I --i J .JI°I,J Gi3Sf1U E1Nr1 1:'(IV hll :.~(Iv .1.Irt S8U1.'Z)ta -1 INM.SOi'aV 0~GT \lyLv olf ` `►y~w} r 0"i',T U"i%'C 0"w'C 08tr1 : 0`~11 T 0'c'.T 1. 0 1' 0'ZT a US G 0 U 'Ni y 0 `J'E N O"Z'C J. 04ZI -*19 'Z 1 : 0817 G C, 1 :3 q .t.H `I0~?1 1 oluY ~ olCrT 1 GOf.T " 969T 9E0r! 1 0 0 H.1 01711 .1. b'zi 0'ZT `t ;;f : 0 -169 rBI 0 J.I 4 51 EM Rf4 83 ~ dS i{N f,th1 R3 Jl?51.:.3W0:7~:) ~ ~:i:~Wtt'1C111 133Ct1NJ 1a,1.3.(i1 S661 . ° . . . . .1143WGlt:l`J s.'i• r•••• 0 a r N:7~tI.l. W ~ t rt Y L L T-,ilT...4[, O■ r• r u u• u e a~iV,\i a Q(~ F 1 1`Y.I. • r• e n a•iSAWNb Q93 ~A.:9111 V38V tql';11x"1"'1I1S/S•JWd?J (8tr1) ~~1.`~OW"~aEIIl:l~S~.f:311d1 .~'>Nfl? ~..)~5N:1l.hII Q:IC:t"!l~!'~!J]:S =E17F~ !,~hT ' . SEPT1 S-9 1 WED 1 6: 07 W&H PAG I F I G P. 03 , ~ I PACIFIC .1025-1 t?.lL Avriiuo N.I P.U. Hox (:-97304 Beilevuc, WA 9RA09-4304 Fiie 3-0283-0301 September 18, 1991 Eestern Washington University ~ Institute for Urban and Local Studies Weat 421 Riverside, Suite 421 Spokane, Washtngton 99201 Attn: Dr. Tony Anderson, Qirector Dear Dr. Anderson, ff,I,,,RE P N E T I C4 MMENT$ - I NE VALLQY_&pZA~ This is in response to the WSDQT letter dated September 16, 1991 reaarding comments to the transportstion section of the Final Environmental impact Statement (EIS) for the Spokene valley Plaza projact. In preparation of the final EIS, traffic volumes for the PtiCe Development were expliCitly included in the revised anelysis. Those Phase I volumes which were greater than the original Draft EIS were included and the analysis for the I-90 ramps re-run. Thus, we believe we heve adequately addressed the issue of the Phase I Price Development volumes in determining the ramp cepacities. In analyz+ng the intersection capecities, W&H Pacific used vetgion 2 of the NCAP software by PS Metro. W&H Pacific also uses the Highwey Capacity (HCS) software for capecity analysis. There tnay be same differances in the methodology used by HCS and NCAP in determining the capacity. There ia cutoff point in assigning levels of service from the deley factors end it is conceivable that the mey be e variance of pne level of service in the calculations. W&H PecifiC has completed many treffic analyses using NCAP for the Stete and many cities end counties in UVeshington gs a transportatEon analysis taol. One can er9ue the merits of HCS o( NCAP, however, they are bOth eCCepted tools in handling capacity analysis by Transportation Professionals, Our use of NCAP was weil documented in the process and there were never any questions raised in usin9 NCAP. ln calculating the capacity, W&H used existing signat timing, existing lane configuration and 1995 base volumes to determine the base 1995 capacity and level of service. The Sullivan Valldy Pltice tprojectl volumes, as well ae tho Price explicit tcaffio volumas, were added onto the 1995 projecred trattia volucridy. Usiiig existirtg signdt tlmfng, the ndw Idvdl of 9crvico was caIculdted. Finblly, to mltlgate the p►opnuud uutiuii, W&H ahanged ch• cycte 1ength, added green time to cortuiri movomonts And prnvlded tor a more coordinoted 9y9tom to ovdlurtn thn oltarnvtlvos to the propo88d 8ction. Thi9 process involved mttny ciiflArAnt qcenarlos for evdlLiatlan VIIoq riiti nnt rnakit uiiy cliongCs t0 lan0 configuration or pheBinA. AI90, this wes a planning Ievdl dxdrui5d. As wd hav9 said, thli does not replace the nccd 1or aotuat cignal tim+n8 rovioi0n0 baGOd dn BCtua1 trsiffiC cuurily ursd usiiia a mnrA Snphirtir.AlAd xlpnsl tirrlin0 uvftwilid lvol. ~ < o(1m R77J1226 fax l20618?2-5341 Ptanninc • EnfiitlcCring - SutvCyinb • LanJtwvpc DCxigii • Environiitcntal Services SEP=- 1 S-9 1 WED 1 6: 0? 4J&H PAG I F I C P. 02 1 ~ With regards to the specific mitigation measures raised on page 2 of the letter, it is our opinion that the double left turn lane from northbound Sullivan Road to the westbound I-90 freeway on remps is more then sufficient to handle expected demand, especially since Phase I of the Price Deveiopment will have edditional slip remps constructed on the north side I-90 ramps. These edditional slip remps will divert traffiC volume awey from the Sulliven Road/northe►n intersection (Westbound ramps). . It may be advantageous to have an right turn iane improvements from the EB off ramp to SB Sullivan Road. This movement could become a free movement, not dependent on the treffic si9nal. A designeted ri9ht turn lane from NB SuIlivan ta EB I-90, while desirably for other reasons, is not justified es a mitigation measure from this project in that very little project volume travels eastbound on I•90 and can be accommodated by the right turn movement end a rlght on red movement. ( 70 trips in the PIVI Peak). A final point, ine analysis evaluated the worse case sCenario, namelY the Sullivan ValleY Plaza tprojnr,tf anci Phdbu I ut priuu DuvuluNr~iutlty wlttfcsut the Evergre8n IntBrchange. If you have any questions, please contact me. Truly, j&;H PAC JFIC, INC. V-04 h G{owitz, .E. Senior Trensportation Ensineer 1dot4.wp ~ ► ~ • . ' ' ' ~ t ' • r ~ . , - NTALLEY rALL SPOKANE, k'ASHINGTON - ~ Prepared for nTewman Properties BY LINSCOTT, LAw' & GRE~SPAN , INC. ! June, 1978 J ♦ • . ~ 7`A}3LE Ol, C0N"I'1;.\'TS Title Page IT7 f, I"' 0 dti C f.1 O Tl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Location 1 2 Proposed Project . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . Street a►id Freeway System 3 P1annEd Roadway T111prOVements 6 Traffic Generation atld Distribution 6 Recornmended Improvernents - 1985 - Without Valley rlall... 9 Recommended Improvernents - 1985 - With lralley r1a11...... 10 Conclusions.............................................12 Tables ~ 1. Rec ent Area Traf_ f i c Couiit s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Traffic Generation............................... 8 _ Follo«ing Page Eahibits . 1. Vicinity rtap..................................... 1 2. Site Plan........................................ 2 3. 1985 Pr9 Peak Hour Distribution................... 9 4. Improvements.....................................11 ; • ~ . . f. r' • ' . r-r..fi:.':. . i ' • - V:ILLElr r1aLL SPO):r1~1E, WASHZ\'GTO\T Introdtict;ioiz This report details the traffic irnpact from the proposed "Va1.l.ey P1a11" Regional Sliopping Center and periphery uses in Spol:ane Count;y, 1►'ashi»gton. The site has been field checked with traffic count and ather pertinent data obtained f'rom the <<Tashing- ton State Highway Depart.ment, The Spokane County Road and Planning Depart,ments, and tlirough ceveral PIM peak period turning movement counts conducted by Li.nscott, Law &Greenspan, Inc. Traffic generation pro jections have been estimated for the development with traf.fic distributed to tlle local street and freeway system. An analysis has been conclucted to deterrnine areas of pro- jected roadway and intersection deficiencies with measures recom- mended to mitigate these future problems. Conclusions summarize Uoth project related impacts and recommended improvements. Setting Location The 70 acre project site is centrally located in Spokane County, Washington, approximately 10 miles easterly of downtou►n Spokane (see Exhibit 1). The property is situated on the north- east corner of the Broadway/Sullivan Road intersection and is bounded to t11e north by Interstate Highway 90, to the south by Broadxaay,.to the east by undeveloped and residential property, and to the west by Sullivan Road and by both an existing Red Lion Motor Inn and by a Standard Gas Station. The project site is undeveloped and relatively flat. . . , „ ~ w o Q ~ o~~ °d , o ~ u . ~ a x z ` pp~w T wN ~ p ~ 51T~. . SP N~ 9o P ~sst SRaApwAY ~ \k IbT14 AvE ~ 3tND ~v~c rN., ro qti 'Po ~ • . ~ i \ . ~ M A'" S~A~R OR MfLR'! . ~j pC KAN~. VALLFY M aL 'V L NSG4Yr, Law ~ UR~ENSPAN , INC,, ENGIN~~RS I e • . - Linscott, Lak,: & G;~:enspan, Inc., Er~;~ir~A~rs . , • ' The area currounding the site is agricultural and residential in nature, k=ith new subdivisions grac3ua11y replacing agricultural uses. The nearest retail-commercial deve].oPment to the site is along Sprague Street, an east-u►est roadway located one-half mile southerly of Broadway. A~9cDonalds Restaurant, located across Sul.livan Road trom t}ze project, is the only other commercial establishment located in close proximity to t,he site. A large industrial area is located one mile northerly of the site along Sullivan Road. This area contains the haiser Aluminium Trentwood H'orks and the Spokane Industrial Park. This industrial area is now the largest tratfic gcnerator in the area. Within the next ten years most of the undeveloped or agricultural property within a two mile radius of the Valley Mall site sllould be developed into residential, commercial, or industrial uses. Proposed Pro,ject . The "Valley Mall`t project will consist of a 650,000 square foot gross leasable area (GL.A) shopping mall containing department stores . and retail shops. The mall will be centrally located on the pro- perty (see Eahibit 2). A 113,000 square foot GLA Convenience Center will be located at the westerly end of the property with 67,000 square f eet GLA of restaurants and garden offices located at the easterly end of-the property. The total project will contain 830,000 square i'eet GLA of development. A loop roadway will eiicircle the mall stores to provide easy . access to all parking areas. The most recent Project site plan (5/11/78 by McClellan, Cruz, Gaylord) shows three project drive- ways to Broadway and one project driveway to Sullivan Road. All driveways will connect directly to the loop road. - - 2 - TG~ ' ~~P~s~~R1A1.- h+KEA ~ , } . k- - ' . R y . SzATr ~r -r- a~~~~ Q + L►~~ , ' h , '`~~N~ M,~S~oK Rv, 1. 1 ~ OF ~ iGE S~ ~PoKAN~ u . ~ESTA~RPNT ~ip►5 ~ ~ ~ V~►~. to. V ~ . tt z ~Gouv~~~L~ , ~ ~2~ , ` . ~ M 17bN~.p s ~ ~ ~ • ►Saw t ~ fi I A►l- ~ ~ I17~~ ~ ~m ~ J00 . , Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Inc., Engineers Street and Freewav S.ystem The roadwa3Ts in the vicinity of the project site provide good local and regional access. However, many are not built to their ultimate standards thus causing capacity problems with existing peak period traffic vol_umes. Interstate 90, (I-90) running east-west, provides excellent regional access from the site to the City of Spokane, the west portion of the Spokane Valley, the northern Idaho panhandle (and such cities as Coeur d'Alene) and western Montana. Itcarries , four travel lanes adjacent to the site, expanding to six in the ~ City of Spokane. The Sullivan-Road interchange with I-90 is a ~ diamond interchange, providing 14 toot wide single lanes for each on and off-ramp. The paved shoulders on each off-ramp,ialthough not marked, sometimes permit right and left turning drivers to separate and form two turning lanes at Sullivan Road. Neither on- off ramp intersection with Sullivan Road is signalized. The closest other I-90 interchanges to Sullivan Road are located two miles easterly and two miles westerly of Sullivan Road at Barker Road and Pines Road respectively. Sullivan Road is a major north-south arterial running along the western project boundary. It provides access to Interstate 90 from the residential areas southerly of the site and from the industrial areas northerly of'the site. Sullivan Road.connects Trent Road (State Route 20) and Sprague Avenue, both major east-- west arterials'transiting the north and south sides respectively . of the Spokane Valley. Sullivan Road has two lanes southerly of _ Broadway and four lanes northerly of the I-90 interchange to Trent Road. The Sullivan Road overpass at I-90 is only two lanes wide. Between the I-90 overpass and Broadway (adjacent to the site), Sullivan Road carries two northbound lanes, one southbound lane, and left-turn pockets in the southbound direction at Broadway and at the main entrance to the Red Lion Inn. A northbound left-turn lane is also provided at Mission Road, Mission'forming a four- way intersection with the main entrance to the Red Lion Inn. - 3 - . . , LinSCOtt, Lav., & GrL-enspan, Inc., Enyineers Broadway is a narroxv two laize roadway with dirt shoulders ad jacent~ to and easterly of the pro ject site. Westerly of . Sullivan Road, it continues as a two lane roadway altliough wide gravel shoulders allow on-street parking in most locations. The posted speed on both Broadway and Sullivan Road adjacent to the project site is 35 miles per hour. The Broadt,ray/Sullivan Road intersection is signalized. A fire house on the southeast corner of this intersection has access to the local streets via a drive- way feeding directly into the intersection. _ Mission Road is tti►o lanes wide running parallel to and just southerly of Interstate 90 west of Sullivan Road. It traverses primarily residential neigllborhoods although it also pi°ovides access to a hospital approximately 1.5 miles westerly of Sullivan Road. . Sprague Avenue carries six lanes of traffic westerly of Sullivan Road transitioning to four lanes just easterly of Sullivan ' Road. The Sullivan/Sprague intersection is signalized with left- turn pockets and left turn phasing provided on_Sprague Avenue. The makeup of Sprague Avenue would be described as strip commercial with several small to medium size retail shopping areas, located one to five miles westerly of Sullivan Road. There are several narrow two lane rural roads providing access between Broadway and Sprague Avenue which might be used by project traffic (Conklin Road, Flora Road). These roads eaperience signi- ficant bicycle, foot, and horse traffic. Sight distances at the intersections of these minor roadways is sometimes limited by the abundant tree and brush growth. ' Recent area trafi'ic counts are presented in Table 1. Counts ' were obtained from the Spokane County Road Department and the Washington State Highway Department. Accident recor ds were also tabulated by the above County and State agencies for various int ersections in the vicinity of the project. None of the inter- - ' sections within a half mile radius of the site experience signifi- cant'accident problems. i - 4 - ~ r - . . Linscott, Law & Gre?nspan, Inc., Engineers TA BLE 1 RECE~jT AREA TRAFrIC COUNTS DA ILY ST~2EET LOCAT ION DAY DATE ~~OLiJ~tE ~ 2~ Sullivan-Rd. S/o Sprague Friday 5/27/77 71340 N/o Sprague " 5/27/77 91657 S/o Broadway " 5/20/77 91707 N/o Broadway " 5/20/77 115402 _ N/o Mission " 9/16/77 16,242 N/o I-90 W.B. " 9/23/77 135472 on-off ramp S/o Euclid Ave. " 9/23/77 13,309 S/o Trent Rd. " 9/23/77 11,352 Broadway. E/o Adams Rd. Friday 5/13/77 31062 W/o Sullivan Rd. " 5/20/77 31460 . E/o Sullivan Rd. " 5/20/77 11905 . W/o Flor.a Rd. " 5/20/77 11385 E/o Flora Rd. " 5/20/77 397 r9ission Rd. W/o Sullivan Rd. Friday 9/16/77 21367 Sprague Ave. E/o Sullivan Rd. Friday 5/27/77 12,705 W/o Sullivan Rd. ' " 5/27/77 13,465 E/o Flora Rd. " 5/27/77 10,232 W/o Flora Rd. " 5/27/77 11,292 Flora Rd. S/o Broadway Friday 5/20/77 15342 N/o Broadway " 5/20/77 15110 N/o Sprague " . 5/27/77 11335 Interstate 90 W/o_Sullivan Rd.. 1976 23,300 197? 25,900 E/o Sullivan Rd. ' 1976 171600 ' 1977 185800 . Source: k'ashington State Department of Highways, Spokane County Road Department. (1)A11 counts non-directional, i.e., total volume for both directions of trai'fic. Peak }1our volumes not available_ (2)Approximate 50-50 directional split during 24-hour period. - 5 - t • . , Linsr.c;tt, Law & GreensEaan, Inc., Enyineers , Planned Roadway Improvements Spokane Coiinty has submitted applications for federal funding to improNre Sullivan Road to a full five lane section between Sprague Avenue and the I-90 interchange. However, past applica- tions i'or f.unding have been turned down. The County has recognized the existing traffic problems on this section of Sullivan Road for . several years but has been unable to fund the ►ieeded impr-ovements. Mr. Jack Finney,; Spokane County Traffic Engineer, believes tl-iat l.Then the State Highway Department is ready to reconstruct and improve ' the existing Sullivan Road interchange with I-90, federal funding would be available for the irnprovements needed along Sullivan Road. The lti'ashington State Highway Department's current scheduling shows design work to begin in 1979 for reconstruction of the I-90 Sullivan Road interchange. Construction is scheduled to begin in early 1981, taking approximately from one-half to one year to cornplete. The most probable reconstruction plan, according to Mr. Jon Manton, Washington 5tate Highway Department, would have a second overpass constructed, thereby providing a two-lane bridge for each direction of traffic. Both the east and westbound on-off ramp intersections , with Sullivan Road would be signalized. It is assumed that the ramps would be widened'to provide for two traffic lanes at their intersections with-Sullivan Road, and left-turn lanes would be - provided on Sullivan Road at the approach to each on ramp. Traffic Generation and Distribution ' The Valley Mall Regional Shopping Center and its periphery uses are projected to generates(15,620 entering trips and 15,620 departing trips) with Mil=PM peak hour trips and mMopeak hour trips (see Table 2). The peak hour for analysis purposes has been selected as 4:00 to 5:00 PM on a weekday where the combined shopping, industrial and office commuter traffic is expected to produce the most severe _ operational traffic problems. - 6 - ~ - Linscc,tt, Lav., & Greenspan, Inc., Enyineers It is estimated that 5 percent of the gross t,raffic generated by the center would be dual purpose trips (i.e. 5 percent of the trips would remain internal to the project site; a shopping trip where the driver also stops at one of the restaurants or a person shopping at both the convenience center and the shopping mall). It is further estimated that at least 15 percent of the projected mall traffic would be trips already part of the existing on-street traffic. These estimates result in only 80 percent of the pro- jected Valley Mall traffic being considered as new to the roadway system surrounding the site. . Distribution of traffic between individual driveways and through the intersection of Sullivan Road and Broadway is dependent on the access design on Sullivan Road. The late.st site plan shows access from Sullivan Road south..of the existing gas station and south of Mission Road. At this location, about 250 feet southerly of the Mission Road intersection,:it would not be possible to install . an adequate left-turn lane or lanes for left turns into the mall. A mall entrance opposite Mission Road would traverse the Red Lion Inn parking area, require replacement parking facilities, and ad- versely affect access to the front portion of the Red Lion Inn. The following distribution and the statements of needed street improvements are therefore based on the assumption that the pre- sently planned driveway will be restricted to right turns only. A-discussion of possible differences, should this matter be resolved to provide left turn ingress and egress,is also included hereinafter. . , - - Project traffic was distributed to the local street and free= ; way system on a.logic basis taking into account existing traffic patterns, existing and projected residential development, and projected roadway construction. T~.irning movement restrictions were placed on vehicles at certain driveway intersections with the local street system. Distribution patterns differed slightly for - 7 - Linscott, Lav•v & Greenspan,-inc., Engineers each ot the three major uses within the Valley rfall Project (i.e. The Department Stores and Speciality Shops surrounding the rlall; the Convenience Center; and the Garden Office/Restaurant Complex). TA BLE 2 - TRAFFIC G'ERt1TI0N DA ILY PM PEAK HOU R IN OliT . USE SIZE RATE 2 VOL RATE VOL RATE VOL TE/f t Mall Buildings 650,000 ft2 34.5 22,425 1.23 800 1.29 840 Convenience 1131000 ft2 60.4 61825 2.6 295 2.9 330 Center Garden Office 40,000 ft2 11.7 470 .19 10 1.48 60 Restaurants 271000 ft2 56.3 11520 2.77 75 1.69 45 TOTAL 830,000 ft2 31,240 11180 11275 Source for Trip Rates: "Trip Generation" - An Informational Report by The Institute of Transpor- tation Ehgineers, 1976. Approximately 40 percent of the totai project traffic is pro- jected to arrive and depart via lnterstate 90, 27 percent to and . from the west (Spokane) and 13 percent to and from the east (Coeur d'Alene).. Overall, 62 percent of development traff ic is projected to arrive or depart westerly of the site, 8 percent southerly of the site, 6 p ercent northerly of the site and 24 percent easterly _ of the site. The shopping mall will attract a7larger percentage'of - 8 - , . Linscott, Lavv & Greenspan, Inc., Enyineers ' traffic to the site by I-90 than will the Convenience _ Center, which will attract patronage from a clientele living closer to and more uniformly distributed around the site. F.xhibit 3 shows PM peak hour project traffic distributed to the local street system. The previously mentioned 5 perceilt reduction in volume due to internal trips has been applied to the traffic slloum in Exhibit 3. , Traffic from Valley Mall will hatTe a significant impact on Sullivan Road between the I-90 interchange and Broaditi►ay, with a lesser impact extending southerly to Sprague Avenue. Broadway will , also experience a significant tratfic impact from development ~ ~ , traffic adjacent to the project site. ~ ~ Street widths in the vicinity of the Valley Mall will.have to be widened to provide adequate capacity for future traffic, with or without A9all development. The year 1985 was used for traffic analysis as it was assumed all project development would be complete with traffic patterns established by that time. Existing on-street traf:Cic was assumed to grow 5 percent per year to 1985 exclusive of the new traffic from the Valley Mall. This growth rate appears app ropriate due to the rapidly ea-panding residential and industrial growth in the area. Recommended Improvements - 1985 - Without Valle.y Mall It is important to recognize that even without development of • Valley Mall, various street improvements will be needed.The following street sections will be required by 1985 to accommodate area traffic even without project development. , Sullivan Road - two through traffic lanes in each direction will be needed from Sprague Avenue to Trent Road. Left-turn lanes would be needed at Sprague Avenue, Broadway, Mission Road and the I-90 eastbound and westbound on ramps. Signalization will be warranted at Sprague Avenue, Broadway, Mission Road, and both the I-90 eastbound and westbound ramp intersections. - - 9 - ~ ~ ~ r i I t7 r t_ / ~ , y~~~}~ Q _ ~ ~ ti+ \ 1 ~ d a ~ ~ ~ , ~ ` ~ ~ ~ , d ~ ~ 1 ~ l~ ~ , p ~I ~ 1 1 ti 1 , ~ . 35 ~ , ~ z~a ~ , , , ~ , ~ ~-y ~ . r } ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 5 L ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 1N~~K ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ -4 Tc a ~ 7 9 ~ M ~ ~f ~ ' ~ _ ~ ~ ~ p y ~ ~;s; -z~ ~ + , o S ~ . . d ~ r ~ • ' . . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~r!/ • - . ~5~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 0 0 Vt • ~p . - 4~ ~ , m.. - ~ . j~ O . ~ ~ ~ 1 - , 4'~ , ~ , . ~ I , m . ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ , ~ 'C._ a , 11Z~ ~ . , 3~ . ~ r--- ' _ ~ • 1 A U'~ • , A ~ , 1~15 ~ ~ 0 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i y t~ , a ~ 0~ ~1 t~ F . i. ' p 0 0 ~~rn ~ ~ o N a a ~ ~ ~ m ~ - ~ 't - 0 S ~ ~ . ~ ~ 19a _ - 3a . Zra ~ E-15 Q Z34 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ e J _ ~ _--.z~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'~.4P~~Y , r ~ -4°G , ' . ~ o--~ 4~5 C-~ ~~o-~ f 35 A o ~ ~ ? ~ a ~ - ~ So [~o~> 40 ~ , g~-~ 35~.-~ l , l~ 340 ~n v i - ~ N ` ~ Z~ ~n o , ~ . _.r~ D~ ~ . - ~ , . ~ ~ . y , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' I ~ ~ / ~ : ) Q , ~ ;a ~ ~ ; r , . ~ I ~ ~ ~ . . ; ~r ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ . ~ . ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ' 'rn a N ~ - 'Cr o , , ~ ~ ~r . G~ q i ~ ~ 2~ ~ 9 { ~ ~ ~ 35 ~ o ~ y ~ ~ ~5 -Qo: ~ ~ ~P~L~C-,U~ a~l,r . . , , ,y . . , . E ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ , , 2~ o ~ ~~S . . - ~ ~ I$ o ~ ~ ~ ~s f ~~s z~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G~"~~ . . , , ; q _ GG P ~/~~J Nau~ i . ~~`~{RrY~ M. P I1T~ m ~ , l~ i "i~r~J• r ~ a a g~D~Pr~~ c.~~iT~K P~K ~ ~ ~ ° U UM~S. ~a ~ Yo1- ~o i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~1 F~ ~C ~ ~D o. ~~Gio~AL P~~~~T I~T u It]N ~a y. (~r , . t.r,-w , ' ~ , . ~ " n ■ ~s. . . i ~ ; ~ ,I . ~ { • ~~1'r~ ' , ~ 21 ~ ; - ~ , . ; ~ . ~ ~ 1 ~ KA N f G. ~ i ~ A1~ K ~A N ~ ~ N ~ , L G T L G ~ ~ ~~J ~ r r , . ~ ~ VA~~~~ MAL-If i 1 , . ~ ~ ' _ - - ~ . - Lincr.ott, L~~; & Greenspan, Inc., Enyitieers Broadway - 1,wo tllrouglz traffic lanes in each direction w-ill be needed k•esterly of Sul livan Road. • I-90 Inl.erchange - a second overpass should be constructed, or the existing bridge widened, to provide two travel lanes in each direction on Sulli>>an Road. Each overpass should be widened to provide left--turn lanes at the an ramps, and the eastbound oFf ramp should be widened to pi,ovide two lanes on the approach to Sullivan Road. ' Recommended Improvements - 1985 - With Valle.y Mall The following traffic related improvements would be required by 1985 assuming Valley Mall development.. This analysis assumes: (1) the improvements listed above have been implemented acid; (2) no southbound left turn entry would be permitted to the mall driveway an Sullivan Road. These improvememts would provide adequate peak hour capacity (Service LevEl C) for all roadways and intersections impacted by project traffic.- . Sullivan Road - Widen from four to siac travel lanes from the I-90 eastbound on-off ramp intersection southerly through the Broadway intersection. - Pravide a second left-turn lane on the southbound approach to Broadway. Oae of the through ianes could become the second left-turn lane. - Provide a northbound deceleration lane at the Mall driveway. Broadway - Widea from two to four through travel lanes adjacent to the ; project site and provide left-turn lanes at each Mall driveway. - Provide left-turn lanes on both approaches to Sullivan Road. 10 - . t - t_inscott, Law& Greensaan, inc., Engineers . I-90 Interchange - Provide an extended left-turn lane on the northbound Sullivan Road approach to the westbound on ramp. Since this turn lane would probably extend across the new overpass, the overnass should be designed to allow enough width tor two through lanes and the eatended left-turn lane, or alternately, so located that a double left turn to the on ramp could be permitted. Conklin Road and Flora Road - Widen to a standard tivo lane roadktay and provide adequate shoul ders between Broadway and Sprague Avenue. - Provide left-turn lanes on the northbound approach ta Broadway and the southbound approach to Sprague Auenue. Exhibit 4 shows improvements required to mitigate operational problems caused by Valley Mall traffic. An alternate design has been proposed to allow left-turn entry to the project site from southbound Sullivan Road. The existing main entryway to the Red Lion Inn (opposite Aiission Road) would be changed to a major driveway leading to the Valley Ma11. Red Li an Inn traf f i c woul d then f eed to and f rom this driveiJay. A section of the Red Lion parking area southerly of the main building would have to be relocated in order to provide room for the new driveway. Should the design prove acceptable, a double left turn would be needed on the southbound Sullivan Road approach to the Mission Road/Mall driveway intersection. 11w0 left-turn lanes would then not be needed on the southbound Sullivan Road approach to Broadway. This improvement would remove a signiSicant amount of project traffic from the Sullivan Road/Broadway intersection and from Broadway, though the improvements recommended on Broadway. • would still be needed. - 11 - r ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' I ~ 1_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~1 ~ ~ ~ r w ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ p ~ ~ l. ~ ~ ,9.~ ~ 1~ . ~ ° ~ ...1 ~~I~~ ~ ~.~~,aa~~~ ~ I ,.r,,-,e~- 'S~'~9~i~1r~~~~i. ~T,~1~,~'~,~h~'rt'~4'~~'~.ir.~~a"l.~~t'u . ~~'M 1 ii ~,~ti,~.., _ ~r'° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v~,~ f~~y ~ ~ w r ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ^f ~~a,"~.~ ±.'.~'+~~4' ~ r _ ~ ~'F''1M'~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ { y ~til I ~i:•.. . ~ r`' a~l ~"~r,~ ~ ~ :~~1; ` ;~P?! ~ 1.tiw ~ , ~p~ ,~~~~fi ~ ~:;a , ~~,~1 . :t ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ W +,r~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 1 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~3 : } ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~x ~ ~ . ' ~ ; Q ~~:h °4 ' -'~,-.'"3~~a• , r ~I~~ ik~! eN'}', ~}F ~ ; {w u„ ~ L -'t', , 9 ~ ~ i ~i ' . ~ k ~ y N~IL t _ ~1~.,! ~~~.t y~. r^+',tiT t'! ~~w~'~ I ~ ''i~) ~ ~ J ~ ~y 'ti ~ 's .lil' . M ' • ~ 'I' •~ti NdR+~ 1 ~~.'~P~i ~~.-i~`~'~~1}q F i~~;+ ~ 4 M ~f ~~w~ r-.~ ~ ! J I ~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T1 f ~ f ? 1 ~ '.vl~. y ~ a ;1 ~ ~ .~r ~ r~ 1 I ~ ~ _ - ~ i . 'r"'' t• j~q ~1~;. ~h~~ r'-~F~~~ 4~~~ J~ ~Rr~L .t.~ '•=~~~~y~ t a ~=N jr!~~ 1 ~ +~~~i ~ ~~}yI 'tYk + ~Li ~t~. ~y~,a'tn~~'4_~~ ~t~ t ~ W • :~.t1.i ~ ~ti.r~~' ` ~ f~Ft ~:I : y~=~p4~ Y t:.~ ~ W 'i ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ -r l1~ ` ^,~r • '"1~~: ~~~~p~n~„q~}f,~tT,;=~'; ~,~,,~~}S*~~'ne~i,~,,.~+ t„ j; , , ~ r` 1~.,,, ~ a'" ~r ~ i c""'r 4 t ~ ~ i ~ ,+~t~, <<a~~t +~"t,~ ~ ~ r ' t•'I ~ ~ ,''e45~~{M,~~1~ ~'~.~1. ~'.C,t•~d~~. ~~Ff~twrf6l., ~Y~~' ~ ~ I:1' ~ ~{_;~~~~~~Oi ~Fu ' 1 1• i ! 1 ~ . ' ~ .r ~ ' ~F 'G.'F` h 1' r. + ~ . •ti ' ~c, „ ` ~ 1 ~ ~d,,F~ ~ t,,, ~ ~f4~~~~ { ;b'~ ,tt~,~.l !it'• s'~/, ''i.l~"" ~ A F~~~., ~ 1~, i~ 1~ . ~~0 i ~ r 1 I l . ,~,a« M'w 1/ t- v f •V" f , i^ ~ ~r ~ / yf ~ ~ f ~~k ~ i~~~ j~~ ~ ~ ~=~',Irl 3 ~~~!1 ~ ~ ~ w I I ~i "Z~IC n~y , w~ iii~~~~ i ° 3 ~ a . ~~T ~ ~ ~ i'1'"'qr~~v ~ ~~'F+1 . • '~i~n~; ~ ~ ~ ~ r~' ' %~'fi'+1~,}~a ~ ~ ' ~ . "'r ; t~.`}. i ~ ~ ~ ~ J A ,kt }Lj{, . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ..Y „ ~ { , . ' y,~.~ t~ ' ~ - ~ ~ . I ~ ~ '~1 ~ - ~,;:~.r `i~~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~,~!`r v ~ ~ ~ ' ~1 - ~ ~ ~,f' '~j~,: ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f N ~ y ° t~~; ~ i. ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~r K~. ~ ,`~t~- ~ "'r ~ - , ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~L, t f ~ - . ~ ~ i. ~ ;y~ :4 ~ 1'~ ~ • ~ ~ , 1~ ; { , ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , ~ .r v ~ ~1 T ~ , ~ Q~ ~ ~ 1 ~;r'~~; _ ,1 a ' t r.:~ ~ ! ~ y,~ P 'f~„ y~'- ~ ~ !~'}"~Jt ,w'" r ~ ~ ( ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo,,~ ~f ` W ~ S ~*~y ~ i L ~ ~l1+~::~ ~ h ■ ~ y,` ~ !il ~ ~,j ~ 4~ ~ ~~x . ~ ~ , a~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ a rw 1 . ~°~s~ ~ ~ ~ I I r~ 11''y ~ , Y i~ ~ ~ ~I : ~ . ` t'~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~j h'~ ;i I ~ J - ` i~ . I f, ~ - ~ ' ~C' , r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r.. ~ . • t ~ i ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~y . ~ ,r,, ~`„1.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi . 1~1 ~ ~ fl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~i ~ ~ ~ T~ , ~ ~ ~ i q ~ w , l ~ ~ x a~ ~ . ~ ' 7 , .  ~ ~ 5~ ~F ~ ' ~ ~ ~ - _ . - _ - - ~ _ I ~ ~ Linscott, La+•, & Greenspan, Inc , Engineers . . ~ The t2•af.fic anal,rsis in this r eport provides a generalized improvement program for the Y•oadways surrounding the project site. When a11 companents of the project bavE been finalized i,rith regard t-o t,rpe of es1.ablislzment atid opErating hours, and defa.rute drive- way locatlons established, a more detailed design can be done on an intersection by intersecta.4n basls. However, improvements recommended i_n this report ar, e adequate to prolnde a good level of traffic serNnce on the streets surroutid.ing the proposed Valley Na11. ► Concl11S1lJYlS 1. The following impravements will be i'leeded on Sullivan Road and Broadway within tl-te next four years even witllout Ntall devel opment . The s eimprovement s will provide suf f ici ent capaci~,~y for the growth of existing on-street traffic. a. Sullivan Road will have to be uridened to four travel lanes plus lef_t-turn lanes betwecn Sprague Avenue and r the I-90 interchange. b. The existing I-90 interchange will have to be improved to provide eitlier a second overpass or a wider single overpass allow-ing tour travel lanes along Sullivan Roadv c. Signallzal:ion uti11 be required at the SuiliNvan Road intersections u=ith the I-90 eastbound and westbound on-off ramps. d. Broadway will probably have to he widened from ttivo to four lanes westerly of Sullivan Road. , i e. Slgnalization will probably be needed at the Mission Raad/Sullivan Road i:ntersection. _ i Each of the above irnprovements on Sullivan Road shouid be completed by 1982 assuming federal funding is provided for the ~ projects. - 12 - I V, ~ Linscoit, Law & Greenspan, Inc, Enyineers . " r • o . y 2. The following improvements will be needed with Valley Ma11 development to provide adequate roadway capacity on Sullivan Road, Flora Road,, Conklin Road, and Broadway. a. Sullivan Road will have to be widened from four to slx through travel J.anes between the I-90 interchange and Broadway. b. A double left turn J ane will be needed on soutllbound Sullivan Road at the access point to Valley 1`tall. Tliis point will either be at Broadway or some deslgnated location near riission Road. c. Broadway will have to be ividened from two to four travel lanes adjacent to the site with left-turn lanes provided at each driveway entrance and on each approach to Sullivan Road. d. Both Flora Road and Conklin Road will have to be improved ; to adequate two lane roadways wlth wide shoulders or curb and gutter. a i - 13 - REM I S ' 't in~ . ..rr.~ r ~ ZE-142--77 I CONDITIQNS FOR APPROVAL tIALLEY MALL 1. Developer shall comply with the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District as they exist at the time of construction. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. Any sewage treatment plant shall be located at least 500 feet from resfdences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. 3. Fire mains and hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Spokane County Fire Marshal's requirements. 4, The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations, when approved by the Zoning Administrator, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location; buflding materials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans; and general allowab2e uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. S. In the event substantial development of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event the zoning of the subject property shall revert to agricultural zonfng. 6. If a"208" Water Management Plan is in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall comply with all rules, regulations, ot' guidelines for surface water runoff management. Such methods as semi-pervious paving and/or oil separators shall be used for parking lot runoff dispersion as requfred by the Spokane Utilities and/or Engineer's Department. 7. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 8. The landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by perforrnance bond in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Berming shall be erected commensurate with the phased construction on the sub)ect property. As construction commences on the proiect, berming along Broadway shall progress therewith so that berming will be in place a ciistance east on Broadway 100 feet beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. JC ~ u _ ~ ~ 10. Raadway lmprovements to Broedway ohall lnclude cucbe and sldewalks on both the nocth and south aldos of the etreet. 11. RIGHT OF WAY - Offelte rlght-of-way requlred for roadway lmprovement8 shall be acquired by the Developer of Valley Mall at no expense to Spokane County. The off-slte right-of-way shall lnclude the following: a) A long t he Ea st s lde of Sullivan Rpad from the North l lne of the Valley Mall north to I-90. b) Along the South stde ot 8roadway from Sullivan Road East to the East propecty llne of the Valley Mall. c) Conklln RQad from 8roadway Avenue South for 150 feet. On-stte rlght-of-ways for the constructlon of requlred roadway lmpcovements shall be provided by the Developec at no expense to Spokane County. The on- s lte rlght-of- way shall lnclude t he follow ing : 1) Along the East slde of Sullivan Road from 8roadway Avenue to the Nocth llne of the Valley Mall. 2) Along the North slde of Broadway Avenue from Sullivan Road to the East ltne of the Valley Mall. 12. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - The County's current project or► Sullivan Road wilt reconstuct Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to SR-90 to four lanes includtng channeltzed left turn lanes at Mtsslon Avenue and Broadway Avenue and wlll construct a new updated stgnal system at the Broadway and Sullivan lntersectton. The County's current project wlll provlde sufflclent addlttonal capaclty on Sullivan Road and at the Broadway-Sulltvan lntecsectlon to adequately handle the [nttlal phase development of the proposed project. Improvement of Broadway Avenue to a four lane wlth channeltzed left tucn faclllty from the Broadway and Sullivan LnterBectlon to the maiar Broadway Avenue entrance of the development shall be the responslblllty of the Developer and shall be accompltshed tn connectlon with the developrrient of the lnlttal phase of the proposed pcoject. Complete roadway lmprovements requtred due to development requlred due to development of the secand phase of the proposed proiect will be the,responslblllty of the Developer at no expense to Spokane County and wlll tnclude: a) Sullivan Road - Reconstruct frnm four lanes plus chappgllzed left turn lanes at Mlsston and atj@eedwa`y _ ~x lanes plus a double left turn lane at the~maior entranc ln lnto the Valley Mall. Possible frlctton lane on the East s of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue North thcu the Valley Mall development. - 2 - . ~ b) Broadway Avenue - Wtden to four lanes wlth elther channeltzed left tucn lanes or two way left turn lane as dlrected by the County Engtneec. Speclal tcafflc flow channellzatlon shall be deslgned at both Moore and Conklln Road to prohlblt dlrect access of the Valley Mall traffic lnto the re8identlal areas. The roadway lmprove- ments shall extend from Sullivan Road East through the Valley Mal1 development wlth requlred tapers. An addlttonal frlctlon lane may be requlred from the maln entrance West to Sullivan Road. 13. TRAFFIC SIGNALS - The Developer's cost of lmproving or oonstructing trafflc slgnals at the following Intersecttons wlll be computed upon the percent of trafflc genecated by the Vatley Mall or as otherwlse noted. Sullivan and Spraque Sullivan and Mlsslon Sprague and Flora Broadway and Flora Sullivan and 8roadway The total cost of expanslon and reconstructlon due to Phase Two road wldening shall be at the Developer's expense. Broadway and Matn Valley Mal1 Ent rance Total cost by Developer Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessttate the wldening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall development East to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway South to Sprague. The lmpact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at thls ttme. However, the Developer should be prepared for future partlclpatton and shartnq of constrvctlon costs for these two roads !f tcafflc projectlons from future phases of the project iustlfy satd [mprovements. , -3- ~ k ~ Li, : a, 1 t 4I4 ~0 r ~ ZE-142-77 -5 . ORDER - CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL - VALLEY MALL 1) The developer shall comply with ali of the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and other pertinent local and state regulatory agencies of Jurisdiction as they exist at the time of construction. Ali necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of building permits. Sewage coilection and disposal facilities shall be designed so as to facilitate interception to a general sewer system and must be approved by the County Utilities Department. 2) Any sewage treatment facilities shall be located at least 500' from existing residences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. Fencing, screening, and landscaping of such facilities may be required by the Planning Department after submission of development plans. The sewage treatment facilities must be maintained and operated by an operator certified by the State. 3) Fire mains and hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Spokane County Fire Marshal's requirements. Approval of all other fire plans by the Fire Marshal shall be obtained prior to the issuance by any building permits. 4} The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations, when approved by the Zoning Administrator after coordination with other regulatory agencies, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: building location; building materials, building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans; and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent , of developing a regional shopping mall shall be maintained. 5) In the event substantial development (the construction of the mall) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event the zoning of the subject property shall revert to the Agricultural zone classification. fi) If regulations emanating from the Spokane 1208' Water Quality Management Program are in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall comply with all such rules, regulations or guidelines for the protection of the aquifer. Valley Mall development plans shall incorporate 1208' Program recommendation concepts subject to review approval by the Planning Director. Any operations within the site which proposes to store, use, handle or dispose of "critical substances" as defined by the '208' Program shall be subject to review and approval by the County Planning Director. 6A) A surface water runoff management plan shall be prepared by the Developer meeting the approval of the County Engineer. The plan shall maxit'nize disposal of runoff waters through grassed percolation area and minimize collection to dry well disposal. The landscaping plan herein after required shall incorporate such drainage disposal concepts. 7) Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 8) The landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by performance bond in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits. The bond shall guarantee the maintenance of the landscaping for a period of two years after completion. Installations of an automatic sprinklers system will be req u i red . 9) Berming shall be erected commensurate with the phased construction on the subject property As construction commences on the project, an eight (8) foot undulating berm along Broadway shall progress therewith so that berming will be in place a distance east on Broadway 100 feet beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. ~ r~ r ` • Y ~ ZE-142-77 -6 10) RIGHT-OF-WAY - Offsite right-of-way required for roadway improvements shall be acquired by the Developer of Valley Mali at no expense to Spokane County. The off-site right-of-way shall include the following. a) Along the east side of Sullivan Road from the north property line of the Valley Mall north to I-90, and from Broadway south a distance of 330 f eet . b) Along the south side of 6roadway from Sullivan Road east to the east property line of the Valley Mall. c) Fourteen additional feet for left turn facilities will be required for Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue d) Ten (10) feet of right-of-way on both sides of Conklin Road from Broadway Avenue south for 150 feet. e) On-site right-of-ways for the construction of required roadway improvements shall be provided by the developer at no expense to Spokane County. • The on-site right-of-way shall include the following: 1) Along the east side of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to the north property line of the Valley Mall. , 2) Along the north side of Broadway Avenue from Sullivan Road to the east property line of the Valley Mall. 11) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - Consistent with the Environmental Impact Statement analysis and with approved phasing of the development, the Developer will provide an adequate traffic analysis with each phase to determine the related specific traffic impacts on the existing transportation system, and will provide prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase adequate assurances to the County Engineer that these impacts, if any, will in fact be mitigated. Neither the State nor the County have existing plans or budgets to presently commit to making the highway and road improvements required to adequately service the proposal at full development, but ✓ will actigely investigate and pursue all possible sources of funding so that advance planning and budgeting of funds for future needed improvements can be made on a timely basis. On State highway related improvements, the State may require the County to participate in the cost of the improvements on a basis of traffic volume. w In the event future public agency funds are not available to eonstruct improvements needed to mitigate traffic impacts created by particular phases of the project, the Sponsor must provide adequate assurances to guarantee the implementation of the needed improvements or delay the development of the particular phases in question until either private or public funds do become available to construct the needed improvements. Spokane County's proposed project on Sultivan Road from I-90 South to Broadway Avenue will complete the widening to four lanes plus left turn facilities with channelized left turns at Mission and at Broadway. A new traffic signal system will be installed at the Broadway intersection. This proposed project will provide sufficient additional capacity on Sullivan Road and at the Sullivan-Broadway intersection to adequately handle the initial phase development of the proposed Valley Mall. The Developer shall be required to work with the County Engineer's Office to develop a major ingress and egress entrance on Sullivan Road in the vicinity of Mission Avenue. e y _ _ r N o t)'lNA. lswv s. ' _ I ♦r- • N • A ~ R< < J Z`-14` -I I - I Improvement of Broadway Avenue to e four lane facility with channeliied left turns, from the Broadway and Suilivan intersection to the major Broadway Avenue entrance of the development shall be the responsibility of the Developer and shall be accomplished in connection with the development of the initial phase of the proposed project, artdcoordinated and constructed jn conjunction with the County's proposed project. Complete roadway improvements required due to development of the second phase of the proposed project will be the responsibility of the Developer at no expense to Spokane County and will Include: a) Suliivan Road from I-90 to Sprague Avenue. From I-90 to a point 334 feet south of 6roadway, the Developer shall reconstruct from four lanes plus channelized left turn tanes at Mission and at Broadway to six lanes plus a double teft turn lane. Possible friction lane on the East side of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue north through the Valley Mall development. Also provide a two-way left turn lane from v Broadway South to Sprague Avenue. b) Broadway Avenue • Widen to four lanes with either channelized left turn lanes or two way left turn lane as directed by the County Engineer, from Sullivan Road east to the east property Iine of Valley Mall. Special traffic tlow channeliZation shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The ~ roadway improvements shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley Mall development with required tapers. An additional friction lane may be required from the main entrance west to Sullivan Road. c) Roadway improvements to Broadway shall include curbs and sidewalks on both the north and squth sides of the street. 12) TRAFFIC SIGNALS - The Developer's cost of improving or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the projected percent of traffic generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwise noted : Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission Sprague and Flora Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway The total cost of expansion and reconstruction due to Phase Two road widening shall be at the Developer's expense. Broadway and the major Valley Mall Entrance I Total cost by the Developer 13) FUTU R E PART I C I PAT I ON - Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall development East to Flora Road, Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague and Suflivan from 330 feet South of 6roadway, South to Sprague Avenue. The full impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections from future phases of the project warrant said improvements. ,14). There shall be no dicect vehicular eccese from thia proposal on to Sullivan , Roadnor an to Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the Circular ' Access Roed to the Valley Mell as approved by the County Engiaeer. 15) The development shall be served by Vera Water and Power District. There shall be no private wells located on the site without the written authority of the purveyor. 16) The applicant shall be responsible to implement those mitigating measures identified in the final EIS including those measures stated under the findings for public safety and welfare. ~ . r " Z E-142-77 -8 17) No building permits shall be issued until all water quality and wastewater discharge permits are obtained. DATED TH IS DAY OF , 1979. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH I NGTON ATTEST: VERNON W OHLAND Clerk of Board BY : . c 1 i ~ ~ vL11 ; .k ;~i• ' ~l ' . ' '''~7 I .00~ 1 / _ . • td►u~,6~ jw ~ ~►l~~lilil ' ' ~''~~%~.L,C 499~~t„~-r~ 14-v ~ ~ ~ ~ a~'~ ~~~u v~ ~-`~t•v~~ ► , f~~,. ~ j ~yr~ vt~ -,-~~~7`/ . . a~ ~ s~ia~► ~tif/ F ~ z4o , 41. ° ` 12 » 21, N"~'I, 21 u.,/~ f,~ - ~ 1.1~~ d~ ~1 ! / ~ti'~ f7 ~ ~ ~j!> o' ; / • ~ r~ t" G, Y,707~p 11 - , . r~ J ~ _ `/~t~ tvk • ~ S ~ ~•i~'t. ~J ~ ' 1 • ~ ✓1 A4o"- eg 1 Vt/t- '~ZL . - . ~ ~ ~ . L4!fe,~ a~ r ~ ~ 44) ~f''_ . i~•~ ~~d~I/~/ ~ ~ QJ ~ e7l ~ ,4d ~ t~ j(4 ~ ~4C' V~ . t► ~ d4e) ~ AW , W ~ !J, A)/W I . ~ ~JC' ~ ~ ~ ~ t '~c~ 17 y ~ ~ r ~ /119 1 ~ • ~ ~,'.~~z~ ~ ~ d ~ . ! ~ ~ - ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . ~2~~J • r.l~ t/t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 614z GZ•~ ` ~ Gr t7 C;-,/ 4-0 ~ ~ . +A)a t s ~ ~ ~ , r,. ~.Gl 6W;14° ~ j44 /0 y, , ci ~ e- OC ~ ~e 4r4 l ~ e C~51 el JA2 ) ~ . c~ ~ ~ ~ . / . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , fv , Y 'y}"~~ ~.~'~~,1 ,p r~~'►'~'~ ~ ~ ~ w~~ 3 f J f 1740 ~.J ~ r-7ar ~ 9 , J i ~ f - t~ L.~ ~ ~c L ~ r~. .•o~. I`..- ~ . ~ , - . , ~ ct o` n - l.~-~,_~:.____•__J , 'T` - , - - r ~ - fc- . ~ . I r ~ • - - ~ , . _ . . . _ _ - - - . n'~ . ~ ~ , C.. ----A~ ~ - - - - - ~ i-_- ~ - - - . _ - , , , . . . . • ~..T ~ ci ~ - - ~ ' , : , ~ ~ _ ; ;1---~__1 ~ , t _ , " L ~ v~+ ~r.~ ~~?1~,._. 1 ►"^'P 1~2.~?.~ ~-r'+i`,4~!~~ - - - ~ t ~ M ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ f ^ , r r i . r' ~ . ' r• ~ • ~ , ' h • , ~ ` ` . . ~ ~ . . . - ~ - - - ~ r • _ ~ ' r ' ~ _ ~ _ ~ F 1~~,~25 ~ /rn,r~~- . - - - - ~ . ~ ~ 1 . r !r- f~S r . . ` . . r , , _ ~ - ' f c._. r ~ - ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ j_. - ~ . ~ w . . F!'i{;~ay .'lot emb€.'r 22. 19-' $ . I. : 30 P, jVi , Place; Broadway C enCre BuiIding,Second Floar :~Tort~i 721 Te~~erson S t:-eet, Spvkane ~ rcial (ccntd,) -to _ b. AflDIicant; Tames S , Black and Cca, 500 Columbia 'Building SDrkane. WA 99201 . c, Site Size. 72 Acres, d. Existfng Zoning: Aqrfcultural e. Pronvsed Zoninq: Commercial f. Prxaposed Use ox Fromerty: Regional ~~oloDinq Center ~ 9. Aaplication of Zoning Provision: C-1hapter 4, 21, Section 4. ? 1 . 1040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing rnay be whether C7r f1D~ thiS X71"'OUoSal- °Nill hdve a S?gI']ffi~ant ?'dversg? --'.'1vfiron?TIental lim"DraC ~ ~ ~ ' cJ ~y 4 ~ ~ . ~ ~~~ADwAy ANE. ~ I ~ l ~ ZE- 14Z- 77 ~ ~ ~ ~ S' PP a GUE AVE 11ZE-142-_77. AGR1CULM-RAz =-QQ'-_'' .j,)4ERCTAL•_ TAMES S BLACK Th~t t-he zone rec~~ssification request (F'i1e 1Vumber ZE-142-77) be continue- to Thursdayr September 28, 1978, -t 2:00 P.M. , t~ allow time fcr furz~.er testimony and discussion, (Mrs. Byr:Ze ~oved, Mr, Quig~eY secondead. - V'ote was unanimous. ) -14 -77 T T QODjj~dERCIAL: , ES_ S _ BLaCK a That the zone reclacssification reques~ (Fa~e Number ZE-142-77) be approved. - and i.n so apQroving, adopts the Staff's finc~~ngs as the P?anning Commission" -s ' ~'in+dings of Fact as ~~r~eli as soecific ~ccanc~it~c~ns ~v~ich were oresented at the ~ hearfng and which will be written arad presented to khe Plan:ning Com:n}ssl-on , w'lthi.n two w,~ekS for their aprDroval, af~er w~~~~ ~~~~~mendatzcn wiIl 'oe ~ for-rvarded to the Bcard of County Commissioners. (Mr. Kennedy moved, - Mr, Quigley Secflnd~,'d . ~ix t3'G~te~ ~Yes"f oT1e T,i otE,d "No" . %,T.D~'[J`;`1 ~'•a~~'? .~C~ , r` ! , FT1"~ ~IN3 ~ (-~F F A!,:"T 3 ~ Z =e CL~ssiflc;arjcn: i"iorth - :=.c r! cru .,-i I, ~/1 2. Wes t - Comrnercial, 3/ 9,~/ ~7 a , 19 ~ ~ ~n C' 1 ~ . Sout~°. - Agrfcultural, Twc-Family ResidPntlai f amiIv ~~~~~enC?ai , , ,+7s~ , i ~ m . ~1; r-~.= i ~ PAGE 2 r " I b) Land Use: • ' 1. Site - Vacant. 2. North - Red Lion Motor Inn and Freeway. 3. West - Commercial business. 4, South - - Fire station and single family residence. 5. Ea s t - Vacant land and a church. c) Reaional Com,r~rehensiye Plan - 1968 The Plan Map has designated this area appropriare for residential development. II. SPECTFIC INFO R a) County Engineer's Offlce: .The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered, if the rezone is approved: NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed minimum County cons truction s tandards . . 1. A written statement wi.ll be presented at the hearing by che . Engineer' s Office. b) Spokane County Health District: The applicant shall comAly with rules and regulatfons of the Health Distrfct in providing for adequate sejNage disposal. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to building aermit issuance. c) Zio, PrQtection: . Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with rhe Spokane County F ire Marshal' s requirements. ' d) Environmental Reyi ~w: , . A Final Environmental Impact Statement has been filed and made available to all Agencies of jurisdiction. e) At the time of finalization of the Draft Environmental Impact State- ment, all portions of the E.I, S, were relevant to this proposal, Since that time some changes may have occurred w'iich should be addressed as new issuues not additions to the E.I.S.f) The City of Spokane has a lette: on file opposing this zone change on the basis of their comment on the D, E.I . S. SubseQUently, those comments were addressed by the consultant for the Final E.I.S. These comments were mostly economic issues; the only land use issue raised was the compatibility of the zone change in reference to the Comprehensive Plan. g) A major concern of the Planning Commission is the issue of surrounding land use, Obviously, the impact of a Regional Shopping Cnnter will alter adjacent land use and surrounding area developmo-nt patterns . The E.I.S. addresses this problem and provides adequate solutions, ' However, until the "fn pragress" Comprehensive P1an is complete and approved, development patterns will not be controlled except by , the current means . . ~ PAGE 3 III. CnNDIT~IONS . If the Planning Commission approves this request, the fcliowing conditions should be consiCered. In addition, the Planning Commission may impose any conditions they feel are necessa ry. a) Compliance with appropriate requests stated under Specific Informat;Qn above: b) The applicant shall develop subject property generally in 3ccordance, within the concept presented to the Planning Commission. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to thQ following changes: Building location, building materials, landscapa- plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variatians must conform to regulatians set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, The original inteat of the development plans shall be ;naintained. c) A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prfor to buflding permit issuance. d) InCerior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. e) That, if afte'r one year from the date of the Planning Commission's action, the applicant has not recefved final adoption of the zone change, the application is void. CONDITIrJNS FQR APPROVAL - VALLEY Ni,6LL . 1. DtBveloper shall comply with the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District as they exist at the time of construction. All ' necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. Any sewage treatment plant shall be located at least 500 feet from residences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. 3. Fire mains and hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Spokane County Fire Marshal's requirements. 4. The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations, when approved by the Zoning Administrator, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location; building materials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans; and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning C`rdinance, The original fntent of the development plans shall be maintained. 5. In the event substantial development of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event the zoning of the subject property shall revert to agricultural zoning. 6. If a"208" Water Management Plan is in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall comply with all rules, regulations, or guidelines for surface water runoff management. Such methods as semi-pervious paving and/or oil separators shall be used for parking lot runoff dispersion as required by the Spokane Utilities and/or Engineer's Department. / PAGE 4 ' 7. Interior driveways and parking area s shall be paved, 8. The landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and sh rubs and be accompanied by performance bond in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Berming shall be erected commensurate with the phased construction on the subject property. As construction commences on the project, berming along Broadway shall progress therewith so that berming will be in place' a distance east on Broadway 100 feet beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing pha s e . 10. Roadway lmprovements to Broadway shall tnclude curbs and sidewaiks on both the north and south eldes of the etreet. 11. RIGHT OF WAY - Offslte cight-of-way requlred for roadway lmprovements shall be acqutred by the Developer of Valley Mall at no expense to Spokane Cou nty . The o#f-s tte rtght-of- way shall lnclude the follow ing : a) Along the East slde of Sullivan RAad from the North !!ne of the • Valley Mall north to I-90. b) Along the South stde of Hroadway from Sullivan Road East to the East property !!ne of the Valley Mall. c) Conklln Road fronn Broadway Avenue South for 150 feet. On-slte right-of-ways foc the constructlon of requlred roadway lmpcovements shall be provlded by the Developer at no expense to Spokane County. The on-slte rtght-of-way shali lnctude the following: , 1) Alony the East slde of Sulllvan Road from Broadway - Avenue to the North line of the Valley Mall. . 2) Along the North side of Broadway Avenue from Sullivan Road to the East llne of the Valley Mall. 12, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - The County's current project on Sullivan Road will reconstuct Sullivan Road fram Broadway Avenue to SR-90 to four lanes including channelized left turn lanes at Mlsslon Avenue and Broadway Avenue and wlll constcuct a new updated slgnal system at the Broadway and Sullivan tntersection. The County's current proiect wlll provlde sufftclent addltional capaclty on Sullivan Road and at the Broadway-Sulllvan lntecseciion to adequately handle the lnltlai phase development of the proposed proiect. . Improvement of Broadway Avenue to afour lane wtih channellzed left turn faclllty from the 8roadway and Sullivan tntersectlon to the maiar Hroadway Avenue entrance of the development shall be the responstblllty of the Developer and shall be accomplished ln connectlon wtth the development of the lnltial phase of the proposed proiect. , ~ . + ~ PAGE 5 ' Complete roadway lmprovements required due to development required due to development of the second phase of the proposed pro)ect will be the responstblllty of the Developer at no expanse to Spokane County and wlll lnclude: a) Sulllvan Rvad - Recons[nlct from^four lanes plus chajp(~llzed left turn lanes at Misslon and at !,f;aadway I'x lanes plus a double left turn lane at the~maior entranc !n lnto the Valley Mall, Posslble frictlon lane on the East si of Sulltvan Road from Bra►adway Avenue Nocth thnu the Valley Mall development. b) Braadway Avenue - Wlden to four lanes wlth elther channellzed left turn lanes oc two way left turn lane as dlrected by the County Englneer. Speclal trafflc flow channetlzation shall be deslgned at both Moore and Conklln Road to prohlblt dlrect access of the Va11ey Mall trafflc lnto the restdentlal areas. The roadway lmprove- ments shall extend from Sulllvan koad East through the Valley , Mall develupment wtth required tapers. An addltlonal frlctton lane may be requl red from the ma tn entcance West to Sull ivan Road. 13. TRAFFIC SIGNALS - The Developer's cost of !rr►provlny or oonstn,cttng trafflc slgnals at the followtng lntersecttons wlll be computed upon the percent of trafflc generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwlse noted. Sulllvan and Sprague Sulllvan and Mlsslon . Sprague and Flora Broadway and Flora Sulltvan and Broadway 'rhe total cost of expanston and reconstn.ictlon due to Phase Two road wldening shall be at the Developer's expense, Broadway and Matn Valley Mall Ent rance Tutal co5t by Developer Trafflc generatec1 by the Valley Mall may necessltate the widening of Broadway Avenuc frorn the Valley Mall developcnent East to Flora Road and Flora Road froni EiI-oadway South to Sprague, The lmpact of the Valley Mall cannot be cie[urniined at thls ttcne. However, the Developer should be prepared for future pcirttcipation and shartng of constructton costs for these two roads If trafflc projectlons from future pliases of the project )ustlfy sald lrnpruvuments. ~ - . . "1 t . , • r '~:5~:~'~i. - ~ ~~i y , . „ • , . ; I ' . . ~ . PLANNING DEPARTMENT BNOAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING H 721 JEFFERSON STREET ~ PHONE 456•2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 . r« • . , • , ,tt , . • • SPOnAnc cOUntr CouRTNOUS[ April 2, 1985 Mr. David R. Black James S. 61ack and Co., Inc. 500 Columbia Building Spokane, WA 99:201 . Dear Mr. Black: . Re: Courtesy Letter - Condi.tion of'Approval Relating to Expiration of Approval for Fi.le No. ZE~142-77. Our files indicate that the conditional approval of your zone change application, Fi 1 e No. ZE-142-77, wi 11 expi.re on Octobei^ 1, ' 1985.. Thi s 1 etter i s a fol 1 ow-up of our recent conversations and your letter of March 18, 1985, regarding the condition placed on your proposal by- the Board of County Comissi'oners wherein they state, "In the event suhstantial development'(constructTon of the Mall) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October l, 1985, then and i-n that event the zoning of the subject property shall revert to the Agricultural Zone classification". After reviewing this matter with the Director of Planning and legal counsel, three alternatives are available to you: 1) You can comply with the above-referenced condition. (If you need further clarification of the terminology "substanti'al development" within this condition, please contact the undersigned.) OR, 2) You may submit a completed application to the Planning Department for a Change of Conditions. The application would request extension of the above-referenced condition. This option would require a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee. This alternative may also require compliance with the following conditions and/or laws. This list is not necessarily all-inclusive. a) A new time limitation for construction as determined by the Hearing Examiner Committee. b) State Environmental Policy Act review. (The prior EIS completed for the project could,after reYiew,be adopted for your requested change of conditions.) v . • ~ Mr. Oavid R. Black - 2- April 2, 1985 c) - ASA-Overl ay Zone compl i ance. (Th i s 1 aw i s found i n the Zoni ng Ordinance. It requi res the imposi tion of condi tions to protect the Aquifer, including ULID provisions.) d) '208' sto nnwater drainage requirements. e) Additional site plan review. f) Review and/or addition, modification to the existing conditions. 3) If you select neither Alternative (1) nor (2), then the zoning will automatically revert to the Agricultural classification on October l, 1985. In the event you select Alternative No. 2, you should submit your application as soon as possible to insure a public hearinq in a timely manner. We recommend that the application should be submitted prior to August, 1985, because of present scheduling delays and backlogging of available hearing dates. I recommend that you make an appointment with the Planning Department for a conference to concisely identify the procedures necessary to accommodate a Change of Conditions application. If I can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact me at (509)-456-2205. Sincerely, 14L"O. X4ws( STEVE P. NOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator SPH:cmw cc: Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney ♦ ~•4_ ~ ~ ~GENDA, SEPTEMBER 22, 1978 TEI,EPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, SPptember 22, 1978, 1:30 P,1Vi, Place; Broadway Centre Buildfng, Second r^loor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9. - -7 7, AaricultLra 1_ to Commerc; a1 (contd,) ;b. Applicant: James S. Black and Co. ' 500 Columbia Building Spokane, WA 99201 c. Site Size: 72 Acres. d. Exi s ting Zoning o Agricultural ~ e. Proposed Zoninge Commercial f. Proposed Use of Property: 'Regional Shopping Center g. Application of Zoning Provision: C'napter 4. 21 , Section 4. 21 . 040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic oi discussion ar this hearing may be whether or not this proposal. will have a signfficant adverse environmental impact . ~ ' ~ - - - ~ i s ~~4 NE RIYE~' 4~E. . - ~R~ . . , F w4 y a ~c - - BROADWAY AV E • ~ > ' ~ zE- r4z- 77 ~ , V) SPRaGuE evE. -11 - . _.s . ~ t ~ ~3~c~cK.. t I ~ ~ l..~, Y+~~~ • ' . 1 ~ .~r/~ ~ °'~''~Or'!%~ ~Gt~~!'~ ~a,~~ - ♦ i ~ p • , 07;e ACE?VDA, SE?``~MBER 22, 1978 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANF COiJivTY PLANNjNG COMMISSION* . Time: " Fciday, September 22, 1978, I:30 P.M. ?1ace: Broadwzy Centre Bui1_dznq, Second Floor North 721 jefferson Street, Spokane ' ZOT\T,E RECL•ASSIPIQjS QiV 9, ZB-1 4,~,77 , Agrl~ulLuraLto ("QMM-ercial - a. Location : Section 13 , Township 25 N, , Range 44, E. W. M. PAR •CL.. A;~ Tliat part of the SVv 1/4 of the NW 1/4 o.f Section 13 described as T'ollows: Beginning at a point 20 feet N ar.d 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner af said Seciion 13, which is the true P03; thence N along the E sicie of Councy road '049 .32; 1/4 of saad Section ? 3; thence S 89°37E 504.3'; [harice S 649.32'; thence S 89°S1'W ~ior_g the 1T line oz Cour.l•y road 530,3' more or 1F s s to the PO B. ARCZLB: ~ 3eRZnning a't a point 20 reeL N anci 30 teet E oi the "vV 1/4 cor.ner of Secti-on 13-2S-?4; thence S 89°51' Emiong the _NT line oT County Roaci 540 ,3' to the true POB; thence N?, 3 Q 5. 2 S' to a point; thence S 89°57'E 519, 3 6' ta a poinl-; th-ence S 0c3 I/4'W 1,306.12' to' apoint on the ZT line of County Road; lhenee N 89°S1`V11' along sai-c'z N Iine of. County Roacl 5I8 . 08' f:o ihe PO3 0P_APGEL_C: = Part of EIze S 1/2 oi the N v\r 1/4 0f Section 13-25-44 descriued as follows: geginning ZO feet N and 30 Ieet F oa the vV 111/4 corner of said section; thencE S 89 ° S Z'E along l•l-~e iV iine of Broadway Rcad No.443 for I,~ 38' , to the true ?03; thence N 0°03 1/2' E 1, 306.12' l-o the IV iine oi the S 1/2 oi the N 1/2 0-ic said section, thence S 891°57'E along the iV line 31 9, 3 6' ; LLhence S(1 ° 07'W 1,306.99' to the iV iine of saia roacl; thEnce N 89° 5I'W alor.G the iV Ii.ne 518. 63' to the true POB; exceptincr rhat oart oi the r/w of PSH No. 2. _~LSQ, that portian of tho- S 1/2 ai tilie N 1/2 of Secr.ion I. 3-2 S-Q4 1;%ing S1y of the Sly line of PS H Mo. Z, dESCribed a s fQllovvs: PARCI~L D: ' 3eginning at a po:1.nt 20 ree1 N and 30 Leet E oi the W 1/2 corner af sa;.d Section 13, and runnang thence S 89°51'E, along the N lfne oi' 3roadway t?venue 2, 512 .52' to the tr-ue I'OB ai the cracr of lanci h2rein deGcribed; thence N 0°1- 4'E 1,308,'73'; thence S 89°5 l'E 519.36'; thencE S 00 17 1/2'W 1, 309 , 60' to a point on the N line af saiv't 3roadwav :1vEnue; , - thence N 89°Si'Vb' aloncr said 3roadwalr Avenue 518.08' to th- P013; excGpc the R/W convEyed to SpokanE Valley I,rrigallon Co.; ancl except the E 200' thereo-f conveyeci to Highway Chapel, Inc. U RCEL. ZL F'ECinnino at a point 20 leet N anri 30 teet 't oi tho- W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and runnii-ig th-:-nce S 89 ° 5 i' E,alona the N line of Broadz+vay AvEnue, 1, 57s.46 Ifeet to the triie FC~a of the tract of land here?n descrihed; khence ?v 0°07`E 1, 300 .99' to the N Iine oi the S 1/2 oz the N i/'Z of sazd Secxian _13; thence S 891°57'E 1, 038. 72'; thenca S 0°14'W, , 30g . 73' ko the N line of scid BrQadcnr~y Avenue; thence N89°5].W, along - said 3roaawav Avpnue 1, 6.16' to the POb; except r/w canveyeci to Saokzrzc- V311eY I: rigaLion Company. - 10 _ (con td. ) • . - p a Z r o • • t ' t AG~N?JA, SEPTFMBER 22, 1978 TFLEPHONE N0.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUIVfiY PLANNYNG COMVrISSION Tf.mee • 'Friday, Septzmber 22, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Pl.ace: - Broaclway C Enlre Buzld ing , Second r? oor No.rth 721 jef{erson Street, Spo}cane ZnN c, RFCLASSI ~I.~1QN_ -8-a - C)-~~•~S.~iraill-i~r~l Siihurh_n UI_'L~~'arT1.?l~~ S > > _.ao~i t,PlidL Ii,?.~ ~c~ _ a. Location: Section. 22,Township 25 N., Range 44 ,EaW ,Ma The South 1/2 of Tract 214 or Vpra Tracts. - ba Applicant: Grant Person GAgent) North 2 2 0 6Pine s Ro ad • S.ookan.e, W; 99206 C. 5iL-e ~ize: 5 Acres. d, Exis ting Zoning : Agricultura 1_ Suburban, es t. ivIa;r 31, 1955. e. ProposEd Zoninq: Mu.l.tip1e Family 5uburban and Residential Offi-cF f , °roposed Use of Prooerty: Aparfinenls and Jffices. 9. Applicacion of Zoning Provision: Ctiapcer 4. 21 , Section 4.21.040 h, Envi-ronrriencal impact. A touic of cliscus sion at this hearing may be whether or not this propos«1 w?11 have a sigraificant adverse environmental impact ~,FAG Gt'~ ~Y~ ~ h ~,zEtr~va ; - < ~ 4 rM ra. ,~;f:~ ~ . ~ . ~ Q C ~ ~ _9 _ SPUKANE COLTNTY FiaANiVING COMMISSION North 721 Jefferson _ Spokane, Washington 99260 Oetaber 9, 1978 Honorable Board af County Gommissianers Spokane County Court Hause Spokane, WA 99260 Gentlemen: At a special cantinuaGian hearing of the Spokane County Planning Cammission an Thursday, September 28, 1978, at 3: 20 P. M, ta 5:5 Q P, M,, in the Broadway Centre Building, the enclased action vvas taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. . . Members present: Mr, McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs.Myers , and the Messrs, Culler, Kennedy, Quigley, and Thomas. Planning staff present: Litt, johnsan, B?anchard, and Johnsan. PrQSecutor's Office; George, Engineer's Office: Finney, Health District: Prather. Sincerely. SPOKANE COUIVTY PLANNING COIVIMISSION Ted cCoury, C'iiairman ,~.o~ . ired L. Dayhars Planning Director McC:FLI3:cmw Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane Counky PZanning Commission at their specfal continua-- tian hearing held on September 28, 1978. , . L ~ MIIVUTLS OF THE SPOKANE C,OUNTY PLAiVNING C`c7iVI1/tISSI0IT HEARIlVG OF SE27LEM3FR 28, 1978 WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commis sion did hold a public meeting on September 28, 1978, to.consider the testimonv and requests of sevPral applicants, objectors, and other interested parties concer-ning the below-referenced zone classfficatiori, as a continuation of the hearing held on September 22, 1978, and WHEREAS, Ar said hea-ring opportuniry was afforded those favoring and those opposing all items of business, a-nd WI-iEREAS, M►.-. 1VIcCoury, M; s. Byrne, Mrs, Myers, and the Messrs. Culler, Kennedy, Quigley,,and Thomas, were in attendance and constituted a quorum, and W3EREAS, The Spokane County Plannfng Commission fully considered the testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommend's to the Board of Gounty Commissioners the following: 1, 2E-142-77 ,AGRICLjLTURAL TO (:OM-3VIE,3CTAL: jAMES S. BLACK ax)d CO, That the zone reclassfficatfon. request (File Number ZE-142-77) be, approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of F.act as well as specific -conditions which wece pr.esented at the hearing and which vvill be written and presented to the Plar.r_ing Commission within two weeks for their approval, after whfch the recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners.(Mr. Kenrzed.y moved, Mr. Q'uigley seconded, Six voted "Yes"; one voted "No", 1Vlotion carr.ied.) Planning -Staff Present: L-itt, Johnson, Blanchacd, and John'son. Prosecutor's ,Office: George. Engineer's Office: F-inney. Health District: Prather. DaTED THIS 9th DAY OF OCT03ER, 1978. By: ivlyrth Blanch:ard R cording Secretary c`,~ For: WeM'dCoury ~ Planning Commis ion Chairman red L-, 13. h h, ~ Planning Director -cmw ~ ~ CONDITIONS FOR TNE VALLEY MALL 1). RIGIiT OF WgY - Off aite right of way required for roadway improvemente shall be acquired by the Deeeloper of Valley Mall at no_ expense to Spokane Countyo The offsite right of way ehall include the followingo a). Along the Eaet eide of Sullivan Road from the North line of the Valley Na11 north to I-90, b) o Along the South eide of Broadway from Sullivan Road Ea-st +Q thr-uA-he-r-equ~red-r-oadway-improvemen~=ar-eao c). Conklin Road from Broadway Avenue South for 150 feet. On eite right of uays for the conetruction of required roaduay improeements a,hall be provided by the Developer at no expense to Spokane County. The on site right of Way shall include the following: a). Along the Eaet side of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to the North line of the Valley Mello b)o Alorg the North side of Broadway avenwe from Sullivan Road to the East line of the Valley Malle 2). ROBDWAY IMPROVENIENTS - The County'e aurrent pro3ect on Sullivan Road will reconatruct Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to SR-90 to four lanee including channelized left turn lanee at Mission Avenue and Broadway Avenue and will conatruct e new updated signal system at the Broadway and Sullivan intersectiono The Countyls curreat project will provide aufficient additional capacity on Sullivan Raad aad at the Broaduay-Sullivan intersection to adequatsly bandle the initial phase deeel- opment of the proposed projecto Improvement of Broadway Avenue to a four lane with channelized left turn lane facility from the Broadway aad 5ullivan intersection to the major Broadway Avenue.entrance of the development shall be the responsibility of the Developer and shall be accom- pliahed in connection with the development of the i.nitial phase of the proposed projecto Complete roadway improvements required due to development of the second phase of the propoeed project will he the responsibility of the Developer at no expense to Spokane County and will include: a)o Sullivan Road - Reconstruct from four lanee plus channelized left turn lanea at Mission and at Broadway to six lanes plua a double left tura lane at the raajor entrence point into the • ~ page 2 Conditiona for the Valley Mall Valley Mallo Posaible friction lane on the East side of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue North thru the Valley Mall development. b} o Broadmay Avenue - Widen to four lanes with either channelized left turn lanes or two way left turn laae ea directed by the Cownty Engineero Special traffic flow channelization shall he designed at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the reeidential areas. The roadway improvemente shall extend from Sullivan Road East thru the Valley Mall development with required tapersa An additional friction l8ae may be requi.red from the main entrance West to Sullivan Roado 3). TRAFFIC S IGNALS - The Developer 's eost of improving or constructing traff ic signals -at the following interaections will be computed upon the percent of traffic generated by the Valley Mall or as otheruise noted e Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Miesion Sprague and Flora Broadway and Flora Sullivan and BroadWay The total cost of expansion and reconatruction due to Phase Two road widening shall be at the Developer'a expenae o Broadway and Main Valley Pqall Entrance Total cost by Developer TraPfic generated by ths Valley Mall may necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the -Valley Mall developcnent East to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway South to Sprague. The impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Developer should be prepaired for future participation and sharing of construction costa for these two roads if traffic pro jectiona from future phases of the pro ject justify 9aid improvements a FJ1VDINGS Septembec 22,- 1978 ZE-'a 49,777. AGRICTTLTTTRAL TQ rO'MIVIERC,IA-L-L _JaM-ES S. ~L.ACK ALTD /-O . I. FiNDILTGS OF FA_QZ a) Zone Class-ification: 1. N,orth - Agricul tura l, 6/18/5 7 2, West - Commercial, 3/9/78, 1969 and 1971 . 3,. South -Aqricultural, Tvvo-Farnily Residential, Single Family Residential, 3./27/42 , '6/11/70 and 8/5/7 6. 4. East - Agrfcultural, 3/27/42 b) Laxld tTsp,: 1. Site - Vacant, 2. North --Red Lion Motor Inn and Freeway. , 3. West - Commercial business. 4. South - Firz station and single family reside-nca. . 5. Ea-st -Vacant land and 3 chur(th. c) Regional Comprehensive Plao - 1968 The Plan Map ha's designated this area appropriate for residential development. II. SPECIFIC sNFORNLATION a) Co,intv E=neer's Office: The County Enginee.r's 4ffice has requested the following bz considered, if the rezone is approved: NaT,E-: All required improvements shall be built to meQ't or exceed minimum CounCy cons-truct-ion standarcis. 1. A written statement will be pcesented at the,hearing by the Engfneer's Office. b) S~~,-l e CQUntv H~alLb Di!LLrfct: The applicant shall comPly with !-ules and regulations oi the h.ealth D:strict in providing for adequate s-ewage disposal. A1-1 necessary Health Distri.ct .permi,ts shal.l be obtained pnior to building permit issuance. - 20 - (contd,. ) . . . ; -LINDTNGS ZE-142-77 , AGRICj7LTUML T~Q CQMMERCTAL (contd.) c) . Fi,r -t rot°ction: - iVlains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the Spokane County Fire Marshal's requiremer.ts, d) - Environmer_ral Review: . A. Final Environmental Impact Statement has been filed and -made available to all Agencies oi Jurisdiction. e) At the time of finalization of the Draft Environm-antal_ Imp,act State- ment, all portions of the E.I. S, were relevant to this proposal, Since that tfine some changes may hzve occurrad which should be, addressed as. new issuues not additions to the E.I.S. f) The City of Spokane ha-s a letter on fiie opposing this zone change on ' the basis of their,eomment on the D-. E.I , S, Subseauently, thos,e comments were addressed by the consultant for the Final E.I. S. These comment's were mo,stly economic issues; the only land use issue raised, was thz compatibility of the zone change in reference to the Comprehensive Plan. g) A major concern of the Planning Commission is the issue of 'sur-rounding land use. Obviously, the impact af a Regional Shopping Center will, alter ad jacent land use and surround-ing area development pa tterns The E.I.S, addresses this problem and,provides adequate solutions. However, until the "in proaress" Comprehensive Plan is complete and approved, development patterns will not bz controlled except by the current means. I II . GO NDTTJO Na If the Planning Commission approves this, request, the follawing conditions should be consic'-ered. In addition, the Planning Commission may imposm- any conditions they feel are necessa ry. a) Compliance with aporooriate requests stated under S;gecific. InfoLnaug above. . b) The applicant shall clevelop subject p.-operty generally in accordanLe within the concept presentzd to tlhz Planning Commission. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permittett, including, but not linnited to the iollowing changes: Building location, buflding materials,, landscapQ plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zonA. hll variations must conform to_ regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent af th:e development plans sh311 *bQ maintained. - 21 - (contd , ) . . FTNDZNG'S ZL-t Q2-77 , aGRICL7L'~T RAL TO CC7 MIvLFRCIAL {con~d III . 5:QX.DTTLON~ (contd. ) c) A landscape alan showing specific detail and accompanied by a' erformance bond shall be -a . p pproved by the County Zon-ing Administrator prioc to buildfng permit issuance, d) Interior driveways ana parking areas shall be paved. e) That, if after one year from the date of- the, Planning Commission's action, the applicant has not received final adoption of the zone change, the appli,cation is void. - 22 - . w 8, ZE116--7$ . AGRICULTURA St]BLIRBAN TO MiJLTIPLE FAMILY SUBURRaN; TH IE MtaNN That the zone recl-assificahion request (File Number ZE-116-78) be denied. The motion for approval to adopt the Staff's findings as' the. Planning Commission's Findings of Fact as well, as the conditions stated fn the Staff's findings, and that a Final Declaration of Non-Significance be issued, was lost for lack of a quorum vote. In the discussion whfch followed, it was brouqht out that approval of the Proposal would be an intrusion into an area of single family residences by permitting apartment houses.(Mrs . Byrne moved, Mr. Quigley seconded. (IVo one voted "Yes"; seven voted "1Vo" . Vote was unanimous for denial.) 9. 7.E-101-78 , AGRIC-ULTURAL '_'C_) TRAN TFNT LNING• BOTV-UCCELLL That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZE-101-78) be denied without prejudice, wiCh the consideration that the applicant could resubmit his application to be advertised for the Residential Mobile Home Zone classification for a public hearing at a later date. (Mrs. Byrne moved, Mr. Kennedy seconded,, Vote was unanimous,) 10. 7.-1_19-78. AG ICULTURAL STTRt7RBAN TQ MULTIPLE FAMI.LY SLTB IRRAN AND ~ RESIDEN'►_'jAT. OFFT_ .E: PERSON That [he zone reclassification request (File IVumber ZE-119-78) be approved, and in so approvlng, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission',s Findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated i n the Staff's findings, and that a Ffnal Declaration of Non-Significance be issued, (Mrs. Myers moved, Mr. Ttiomas seconded, Vote was unanimous.) 11,. 7F-142-77. AGFZICULTURAL TQ CQMMERC,LAL: TAMES S, BLACK AND CO - That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZE-142-77) be continued to Thursday, September 28, 1978, at 2:00 P. M. , to allow time for further testimany and discussion. (Mrs. Byrne moved, Mr. Quigley seconded. Vote was unanimous. ) ' 12. Luncheon Meetino Topics of discussion included: a) Technical judgments by the Commission. b) A crash program to finish the Hearing Room: Speakers to hear better; Lighting arrangement on Commission's hearing table; and Ventflation in room. c) Guidelines for Short Plat Administrator in appeals. d) Sewage disposal systems. e) Zoning Ordinance - amendments and proposals thereto brought up to date. _ , , ,~=1 l.r $4 -/j BEFORE THE BOARO OF COUNTY COMMISSiOriERS.OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER COiJCERNING ) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) ZE-142-77, AGRICULTIJRAL ) NOTICE OF TO COh1MERCIAL ) PUBLIC HEARING SPONSOR : JA14ES S. BLACK ) AND COi+1PANY ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners -of Spokane County, Washington, w?1:~ held. apuhli.c hearin'g at ~:30 P.M. 0~1 (VOVEI~IBER,20, 1,978, a t i ts offi ce i n the County Courthouse to cons i der the above-mentioned zone reclassificati.on on the following described p.roperty : SEE OTHER:SIDE NOTICE I'S FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a s,ignificant adverse environmental impact. NOTiICE IS FURTHER GIVEIV that any person interested may appear at said hea,ring and present testimony either for-or against the application of the above-menti,oned'zone rec.l ass i fi cat-i on . BY OROER OF THE BOARD this 9th day of October, 1978. - UERNON W. OHLAND CLERK 0~ T E BOARD BY: D -P U T Y . , _ s . ~to4 NE RivE'~ M SI pN 4y _ ` - %L - E- cR~~ ~ l -q Y .o BQOADwAY AV E. i Z > ~ ZE- I4Z- 77 J ~ ~ SPQAGuE _avE,_~, - _ ~ . - - . r ZQNE RECLASSIFICATION • •=142-77 , AacicultLral to Commercial a o Location: Section 13,Township 2-5 N., Range 44, E. W. M. PARCET A: . That part'of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of , Section 13 described as follows: Beginning at a point ZO feet N and 30 feet E-of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which i"s the true POB; thence N along, the 'E side of County r.oad 649.12"; I/4 of sa9d -Section. 13-; thence S 89°37'E 504.3'; thence S 649 . 3 2' ; thence S 8 9° 5.1 W a long the N lfne of Coun ty road 53 0. 3' more or less to 'the POB. - PARCEL B: Beg-inning at a point 20 fest N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4, corner of Section 13-25-44; thence ~S 89'° 5VE 31ong the N line, oi County Road 540.3'' to- the true POB; thence N 1, 305..25' to a. point; 'thence S 89 ° 57' E 519 . 3 6' to a point; thence S 4°3 1/4'W 1, 3 06 ,12' to a point on the N lfne of County Road; thence 1V 89°51'W along said N line of County Road - 518.08' to the POB. • PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/Z of the NW 1/4 of Section 13-25-44 described as follows.: Beginning 20 feet N and -.30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said,section; thence S 89 ° 5.1' E along the N line of Sroadway Road No.. 443 for 1, 058.38' to the true POB; thence N 0°0:3 1/2'E 1, 306.12' co the N line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of said s.ection,; thence S 89'°57'E along the N lin,e 519.36'; thence S 0`07"W 1, 306.99' to the IV line of said road; thence , N 8,9° 51'W along,the N line 518 . 63' to the true P4E; excepting fhat part of the r/w of PSH No. 2. , tha*t portion of the S 1/2 'of the N 1/2 of Section 1-3-2.5-44 lying Sly of the Sly line of P-SH No. 2, described as follows: PARCEL D: -Beginning at.a point Z0 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/2 corner of said Sectiorr 1.3, and running,thence S 8° ° 51' E, alcng the N line of Broaciway Avenue 2, 612 . 62' to the true POB of the trac't of land herein described; thence N 0°14'E 1,308.73'; thence S 8.9051'E 519.36'; thence S 0.° 1.7 1/2'W 1, 3.09. 60' to a point on the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence N 89 ° 51'W along said Broadwa.y Avenue 518 . 08' to the POB; except the R/'V1T conveyed, to Spokane Valley Irrigation Co.; and *except 'the E 2 00' thereof conveyed to Highway Chapel, Inc. - PARCEL E: Beginninq at a point 20 feet .N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and nlnning thence -S 89`51'E, aiong the N line 'of Broadway Avenue, 1, 576,.46, feet to the true PC' B of the tract of 1and herein described; thence N 0°07'E 1, 306.°9' to the N line of the S 1/2 of .the N 1/2 of said Section 13; thence S 89,°57E 1, 038 .72'; thence S.0`14'W, 1, 308 , 73' to the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence N 89°51'W, alang said Broadway Avenue 1, zzA..1,6' to the POB'; except r/w conveyed to Spokane Valley Ircigation Company. a , ~ilh ~ r~:~~ u W~.~ iui M. m~ p~ 4., i . i~,~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i f~ ~ i~i ~ .'i p ~ ~ti ~ ~ 9 ~y J~h';~~'ER ~VI~LlA1~~fl~v" to de~~ a~s appeal et th~ F~rtment ~tu~t nat have ' C~u~ty ~~mmiss~~n~r~ t~r Councy F'1ann~n~ ~omrnis- k~ept yoc~ roun~c~l in- ~ d~y ~~ve unanimaus ap- ~ivn s a~~rnv~~ of ttac f~rm~id. h ~ro~ al t~ eun~tnietir~n af ~~~`oj'~~`# an~ to re~on~ f~r the ~Jus~:in L. Qttarkcn'hv~h, r~e~ianal s~appi~~ c+enter i~ req~~st~d ~ti0,0(1~squere. ~ttt~rnc~ for ~ae ~h~p~ing th~ Spok~n~ ~~lZ~y, ~~s~it~ ~c~~ shoFping c~nter t+~ be c~ntea~ s d~ve~op~r, Jam~s ~ r~a~est by ciEy ~afficia(s ~o'~ate~ ~t the n+~rtheas~ ~luc~c, s~~ th~ c~ty's r~ ~ ~orner o# Braa~lway and '9uest wa5 n~rt a pr~~r a~e that ~~Iecasior~ be ~~lay~d. Sul~i~aar~. Quu~eken~ush said w~~ Gre~ ~rnfC~, a~si~tant rity rmi~h srsd Mr~. S~~no~ "~r~~t1y ~ur~~ised by ~t.'~ coa~ra~oo co~ns~l, and ~r e,~ th~t th~ st~ll. ~~~d 1U copi~s of ~e ' Ca~cil~vmman Mart~a ~ a ~anr~~n a~~~r~d 't~for~ t~fi~is~e~l 5i~dy,~ ~n drr~~t ~.n~vironm~ata~ irnp~~t ~~'lE' !C4Ct1~111551Of1 TL~k~(?S~ ~~S}~~C~10~ [7f ~1!€' ~f10~~'!£' ~'~~~'~Il~[1t [1iCl ~1@ ~ll'[~j~C~r delgy ~ Ciky C~uncil r~pre- ~~u~f~r [underground water [~~d ~n ~e~ana,~ry 1~3, w~re sc~~rce~ anci tt~e rec~~tiy b~e. ~ent t~ t~e City Cn~c~F and ~~~t~tiv~s mi~hk se+~k a~di- ~ c~,rnpreheasiv~ ~l~ f~r ~~di~on~~ copies t~ the S~ro- ti~na~ c~mm~~t. I~rs. Shan- t4~e l~irag~ ~a~ $row~~ thc kan~ R~g~anal Pl~n~n~ ~on ~nd Smi~r ~~id op~or• ~ify, ~mik~ w~~ld prov~de Co~erence. H~ said t~e ~wa ~unit~e~ ~'~a~ city ~i;~cu~sia~ have n~t hees~ ~c~~quat~. v~~~~~e u~to~al~c~n far ~~ntiLi~s +~ere a15o mafPeti de~ci~i~n e~~ th~ st~a~pi~g c~p~es af ~~!nal impact ~~t t~e ~~mmi~sioners, ~~a~r. at~t+~me~t, ti~~d ~st ~'~ly, ~ca~i~~ that th~er~ ~ver~ Sn~it~ a~~~ ~iak t~e c~r~- Qu~ckerj~uBh add~d t~~t two p~hL~ h~arings an ~he t~r ~~a~1~ hs+we "a rr~~jar ~~ann~n~ ~~nmi~si~o~ ~~kter tt~~d th~~ Ci~y Plgn- irr~~act" ~n~ fh~ ~~ty ~nd he~~ on Bl~ck'~ gr~p~ss~ n~i~ Directar Terey caun~y ~fld '"pr~bahly th~ last~d twa €i~ay~. C~~~~ had w~ritt~~, a~ ~~ven- w~o~e ~l~nd Err~pxare.'" "'~h~ ha~ to 6~ ~rn~ pa;g~ J~tter ~c~~~g f#~ ~Q~~issia~t ~~drm~ ~~a~ty," ~uack~nbus~ tatd ~r~~ect ~n sn ~nviror~menf~ ~~y Ch~t~n~n tn~d the ~c~rnmis~~~r~cr~, "'The ~mp~et sk~t~m~nt~ di~ n~t 5rnith, "I #~ie~d to ind~eate ~~ty's p~,sit~~n b~~ b~ee~n share ihs~ ~~i~tiv. t~at t~e c~~y hed ~dequat~ ~tate~d a~d it is th~r p~~ltfon ~ T~e ~~amml~slon~~s v~tc*~ i~p~t...Your p~$nning d~- th~t, ~caus~ ther~ ~S ~r~a- ~ i~~ stu~y, ther~ ~t~,~~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~r ~ men~ior'sun~ ~n develap- , Z"h~t is the sugges~ion ~ that ~s ~ree~ mati~e ~ : ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ p ~►nppro~ ~b~narc~ de~med { Qua~kenbt~~h ~lsa ~nt~ 'I'~r~ ~ossi6l~ p~njects ~ui,~e a ~cen~ of th~ ~ized ~l~~g`~ ~ommer~~ ~ ~~ar ~he Ca~muni~y I~evel4p~ ~~'~'s i.se+am~s. ih~ i~pa~ct ~tatennen~, ; rnent ~~o~~C Gr~t pro~r~m "'W~ wi:~! l~v~ ~i ~v~y ~wh~~h primarily de~lt with ~ wil~ be discu~s~ Wedne~- ~~~t 245 p~e+u~~~ when vrre th~ pr~~d ~hoppi~tg ~en- ~~y ~~t at'~; 3Q ~a~ the Med. a~p~y ~~r the gra~t and if v~e t~r`s imp~ct a~t ~h~ dowr~- ic~l T~ake `~~w~a ~Iall, ~nnd 1`~C@1~@ it then we w~~l+~ #ovm ~r~~. ~icca~ding t~ on~e is ex~eect~ci tv be ch~sc~ h~v~ ta ~ave ar~ f~cnm~ r~n- Quaclc~nb~tsh, ~t ~S "i~cor~- For ~ubm~sin~ irs th~ S'Ik5 D.~ 1.I1~2 W~1Ul@ ~IJUITJr'~n~ g~~us t~a h~~e t~ae eity pra~gr~m. pl~~ne~ ~arry Stoc9ftnr~ ~~r~e be~o~~ ~au~ and te11 Citi;~~s s~~~st~~I gr~nt s~~d. yau ~~t tQ a~pprov+e t:~is 6e- a~pl~cati~qs ~e m~de tn cav. T~~ 8ra~~ w~~ ~~sed ea~e #t wil~ ~o~npet~ ~ttx er t~he ~QS~ ~f m~inta~aing to h~~p t~a~ lr~w~r to middl~ k~~ d~u~nllaawn c~~r~,~ ~u~i- th~ wat~r s~s~tetx~, ~e i~ta1- re~id~enf~ tne~~ filae r~es~ di~tri~cl,,, l~~ic~~ a~ a s~wer system o~ ~a~~ impmvem~nt dlstriG~ ~I~ ~~d `~alley ~a.~ w~1. t~~ ~ca~r~i~,~ o~ a~C of the assessmea~ k~t ~v~a~ld l~e ~~2 ~ Z3 n~ile~ ~rom down- ~ to~n str~ets. r~ gr~nsity s~r~- ~a~d~ ag~r~st tb~ hQmeown~ t~awn, te~a ~s exp~eeted Go h~ w+~rk. ers tar the Insta~,~Qn o~''~e '~e fr~-~~rp~ri~~ sp~- ; ~ a~at ~t th~ mceti~~ ~a s~e curb~ ~oc ~~uver. te~ w~Z m~k~e ~ae d~t~rmi- ` ~ wh~ch wauld bc he~~ ~l~ed T~e ~ahl~ ir~~►tia~e ~evel aa~i~n ~i it~ ~ccr~aml~ feasl- #ar the a~p~c~tian f~r t~t~ for th9s ~ca~r fs $12,95p an~ hi~ity, Blac~'s ~~wy~r ~+dd- ~ra~t. thcrs~ ea~ra~ing b~Sow t~hat e~l. ~th #~e st~eet ~tr~i~g ~mount wcaul~ be ~ide~ hy H~ ~~id ~~timat~~ i~d~- a~d t~e ~ewer p~op~s~l~ w~1 th~ grani prro~rgm. ca~E~ thcrc wti~l~ ~ 50,404 ~a 70,C1~ ~ew ~si~er~t~ ;it~ ~,t~~ Vt~11ey by ]'~5. '~os~ r~i- ~ - der~t~ ~re ~ntitl~i ta th~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ own r~~io~gl s~~ppir~~ e~n- ~er, Q~~ckenbusb ~aPd th~ cn~~s,i~~~~. ~e ask~l th~m w'~~~er ~ ~ #h~y wauld t~ "Vall~y r~~~- dent~s tt~~~t ~t3r~ m~t ~v ~ ~ ~ ~ th~ir s~~ i~ ~d~swntc~ A~ ~ ' ~ .~y, i~as~,r+~, ~tb~t bto~'~""' ~~~c~~~ t~~t ez=e~ a tr~et#ic, ;t~v i~r ,n~ p~rY~n~ ~r~ ai~ qc~s~ity. ~ r. ~ ~ ~~~f~ ~ . i ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~f i~ ~d~~~~~~~~ Cnn~kzvction c~f "ti"~11ey 1~a11" re~ st~~b" .~ule~efif~rt~ l~~a~da;~i~y $pre n~ f~r Ble k, to k~~r ng e.~c~ep~i~~ to o gianaa shr~~~i~g +~~nt~r in ~~e Spokane l~ast-~ni~ ~ Vall~y~ u~ill ~~i~ ~n l~f~ I~~3, devel• sent~tive~ ~f th~ ~Ciky ~nf 5!~r~~r~~ to the c~ty"s ~f~o~ts t~ pc~stpone the ~le~i- ~~r J~m~s S, ~lac~ said ~'~a~~aY h~r~~ the m~~ter ~d~~yed a~~in ~~as si~n, Ea11ow~~g appe~v~l ~f i~e ~xc~~e~r4 by cha~ly ~eb~ied. ~~e sa~~ copie~ of b~th l~e draft ; the S~~l~a~ne Caunty ~~a~rd of Co~mi~- Gr~~ ~mith, a~sist~~t +~ity c~rpor~~ ~~d ~inal env~ro~~m~ntal impnct s#ate- s~o~cr~. k~~r~ ~~~~e~, s~id the ana~l w~~1d h~ve m~~~ far the ~de~~~lo~~~nt were se~t "~U~~'rc d~lIght~d,"' Bl~~~ 5~it~ a~ the a ma~o~ irr~p~~t on the ar~ee an~'t~~t t~ th~ Cit3~ caunc~l ~1Qr~~ wi~h ~dcIi'tion- y~pa~aimQU~ al~prov°~1 ~y Eh~ c~rn~ni~• ~ity o~fi~cial~ bel~e~e~d ~~ey b$s~ nat had $y ,~~t~s to v~r~c~uy city departt~~Ats , .~~o~ers to ~~z€rr~~ 7~Q ~cres at t~e c~rr~~r an ad~quate chan~e t~ cn~nrn~nt ~t, ~.~e} re su~~`es~~ tha# yot~ ~ha~td IA tj ~~f ~r~adw~~o ~nd S~llivan fr~m Srt~ith ~~id neither t~e ~ay~r nor th~e dec~ere a rr►oe~toriu~n o~n ac~vitp ln ~ • ricultu~e ~o cc~mm~res`al frr ~n ~4,~~►[~~ city mana~~r he~d been s~►et~~~allY ~aua~y~" he sa~i~ of'~rs. 5h~nnan's ,'~quAr~-t~~t shoppEr~~ m~ll.. "V~ll~y n~ot~~e~c1 of ~earir~g~ ~a ~e pr~oj~ct an~ ~ re~i~dm~~ts ~re en~8tled ta e~ re~ia~~na~ asked the co~nmissian~r~ #a ~e~~y r~que~t to c~~l~y ~e decision ~ntll tb~ ~E ~,h~~p~r,g ~a~~lliEy~" their d~cisiara, 2Q8 a~d fri~g~ 5~u~ies w~e~e fin~shec~. f~ ~3iac~ ha~ be~n ~1~~ni~g f~r a 1~63 ~'~amr~i~~iv~er ~Ha~~~.~~ ~~y ~ot~~ i~ th+e gas~ ih~e ~omrnis ~ . cnns~ru~tion star~ sinc~ the prcr#ee! ~~r~st+~r~~en ssid he b~ll~v~d t~~ citY ; iir~t ►~as pro~~~~o He knc~ic~ted ~ion- had ad~quate ch~~~ce to com~er~t ~ioners l~ave reje~c~~d such ~sugges .~~y he ~v~~ i~ ~nmta~t wi'th s~ver~l throughg~ ~~d age 1 t er~in~ ti ~~~~~en6ush said i~ was "incaa,g~ru- . ~ra~~~~c~iv~ ~er~~nts. wh~ch h P ~~s" far #~e City 1~ ogpc~se th~e sh~;p- '~'~e pro~~ct, ~ri~►a~1y a~prt~we~ by ~pp~~itic~ra ~o the project, , the S~~k~~~ Cuunty P1a~n~~~ C~m- „Y4t~ pl~~~ng ~~pesrtm~er~t ~~t et3d}o~~to~t9~e~centraI~hu~ine~ ~d ~ ~ mi~~i~n ~ept, ~as a~p~al~d t~ t~~ n+~t ha~e k~pt y~ur ca~ci~ i~aramed, ~ ret. I~e s~g~~~t th~ ~ommissioa~er~ ~~a~anty cornm~s~~p~e~"s ~IQV, by a t~~ said. . gr~up +~t aear~3~ reside~t~ '~~~t~eir ~e~u~in ~atto ~y~ ~a~t~+~~ cou~nty, deC~tkrn'~at~o~ oY th~ ~~~o~ni s~in tY~e ter,d~~d ~e n~~~ ~~ould destroy~ ~ c ~ ` semi-rural ~ifestyle. ~i~rted ~u# t~at an ~d~i~~n to th~ m~~t~s not re~Iis~ic in ~t~ ag,e af +~n~rg,y tt Ri~~rd ~ieg~~, iV"~a~ Cttn~li~~ letttr, ~~m~~rs af t~~ cily p~~n~i~~ . g~a~~, 1~~~er th~e opi~Si~S re~i- r~~p~.rtm~t~t had te~l~fie~d o~ the ~t'asis that th~r~ c~~'t be a regian~ ~d~nts, call~d the deci~in~n a~ very pr~j~c~ ~ef~re th~ co~ty~ ~l~nni~g ~hs~ppi~g ~+cnter in the ValYey~ n~ .~~~p~d ~~g." He s~id h~~ gra~p'~~uld c~mmis~i~n ~nd r~er~ a~#ard~~ a said. be mee~ing ~,~ota to discuss th~ d~c~`~~ ch~~c~ t~ ~e~k~Y ~t i~e ~pp!~~1 ~all~y~ ~s dents~s~ ~d f~ht tral~~ct sic~n ~n~ ~erid~ wh~t~er~ t~r tslte f~r hear~n~. ar'kipg, prob1em~ ~~d gnd goar ~m ~ ee a~~i~~. ~~e noied that even l~~t week, ~he p - ,~s $pp~al d~+~i~ia~~ go~ V~~ley' first ~im~ the r~atter app~~red ~at t~~ bi~~tt ~tr ~uslity t~ ~a ~t~wntt~~vn and 14ia11 r~ques~ t~ro~ the cam~~ssi~ne~s ca~mr~is~io~~~a' a~~n~~, ~o t`epre~en- ~h~r~. ~han~t~n ~~id th~ r~mmis- ~n un~~~u~~y x~n~ ~me Q~ re~a~ve ~ tative~+ of thQ c~ty ~ere pr~s~e~at. s~~~er~' d~cision was "nat ~z~~ri~~n~, t~ka marat~rs cor~~par~tl th~ t~o ~~~nci~w~men ?Viarth~ ~h~~no~ w,~re ~bvi~us~y ~5 ~~m~e ta ~he i~~t ~~,~~~{5 ~'~T1~Te~~~' OI18P~F~~~. ~sk~c~ ~~e c~mmi~~ion~ers ~ postpone ~~~~~k said h~ was pleased "khe canj- tl~~ei~ ~e~i~ion a~ t~~ ~al~~t~~ o: th~ m~~ ~t~te ! rz~a~~~~d~she~~ 1mo~~ ~ m~ssian~rs di~ su~9~ a thar~ugh ~~ob ~rf the 2~8 ~4 ~~er Q Y st~dying the pr~~~~~." Spr~ka~e Aquif~ear and ~6e city-~~u~ty e~g~d ~h~t m~~nfa~rs a# tbe eit~ plan. As gecenlly last ~ve~k tt=e ~omW iringe ~r~a lan~ t~e ~tudy a~e ba~~t ly ~~g ~n the~p ~ajec~ ~r~- messianers c~n~u~d the pr~pns~l to ~ampl~t~d. - il ~ 1~ ~'1€~[~9' W~l~~l~ ~1~ 11a,~.. u~in~ ~re~~ all uv~er 1he Arc~r~rn~ ~rn 4 ~r~~. ~lany ~~res nf 4~d tnn ~tate ~a~rr~l, I~rry ~7~~n , must :~~r~~c~vr~es be re~~l~d ~~e ~~1~e, 3D, E32~~ 14th, c~as ~~ring t~e p~s~ tc~ ~~tiher cr+~qa~ a~ a resvi0. uf +~aslt~u~d c~n th~ fre~eway ~nd ~~~u~.ir~g on Tr wi~~t~e~~il~ ~3an~a~e, W4~i~t~t~r- ~,Q tv~~ hc~r~s ~~~re ~nrth- F~~. at ab~r~ ~Oll ~~c.r~~ ~'hen the te~np~'~- b~un~! ~hen t9~~ ac~~dent ,~r~ ~truck whe, ~u_re of th~ ~~~eai p9an~°s ,~~urred at ~:~0 a.m. tr~ ~v~►i~ ~~~~I ~a~,~ ~r~gs be~~v~ ~4 ~~~r~e~ V~1v~"s picku~ su~tsi~~d y~itli~m Au: ~1;~ in da~na~es, r1~52~ &rid~e = ~ ~ chrivin~ east "sn ~ ~d l~u~ne E. ' ~ti~47~4 ~"Iayhew, ~ ~ ~ ~ bcaund, ~ ~ ~ ~~tin ~w~r~ed ~ ~ ~ ~t~upp~~ vehi~#e ~ ~ ~lruek ~"er~~r`~. ~'~r~er ~c~Ef~eed ~ ~ z~ultiple ~ ~ 4~~~rataons, decara [~~t~'~I repn~l, t~ p~s~~i~er, Ka~hy f~ ~t th~e re~r~esi of dev~loper~ "~hii~us~h~c~lYv ju~~if~eci" in 31, ~ff~er~i ~ sprai J~,~~Q~ ~ia~k end Harry ~sse~fa~~ t~e ~ast ~f r~a~ ~o~~ ~~re ~~o~~ita~ ?~~v~-~~an .~r., t~e B~~rd i~Eprirae~te~ts an 5~~~ivan S~day ni[~h4 at ll car a~c~d~n1 ~ec ~p~,kane C~aur~iy Cnrnmi~• diret~tly to ci~er~, si~ner~ uill del~y he~ring an E~er~naly sai~i tlr~e ro~d ~'~~~ne~ ~i~ile~i the finding~ and orc~~r Eor the i~pr~v~,.~nt~ dcerr~ed nec~• ~ ~ ~r~,pased 4"alley ~1~11 s~~aer• sar~~ ~+a~ Su~ivan and ~3~9ad• ~►rith, 39, ~5f1~5 ~ ~ar re~i{~nal shn~p~~g c~nter ~nul ~ay ~~+~uld nat l~v~ been suffered h~ad eces M~rctr 19. nece~sa~y v~~ere it rrot far ~ pc~~6Ee e~m~t~si Justin 1.. Qu$eke~~b~sh, 1~'~Iley ~l~l and the +~'i~e~in~ e~stb~~n~ pickup 1` a~t~xn~v for th~ derre~r~~rs, w~~asn'~ io~Xu~d~! in c~ur~ty u~ the ~r~rt3~ ~i~e tQl~ ~he I~~rd durir~g i!s pre~ ~lans ~or tFtie ~~ea ~efare fire hy~€~rt f ~t~eek'tn~ bl~~ef~tg his c~i~r+t~ Va1~ey Mall w~ prapose~. i~e was ~~E:~~it~sti~~ w~nt time tu stu~~~ revi~~ed ~ canditi~ns for appr~val pr~pt~s~~3 by ih~e ~pnkane ~~~~~~~r ~untv En~ineer~~g F~e!par~ ~5~eci~ic~l~y', ihe ~en~in~r~ * ~~t '~~e d~vel~ es t~ asl~ng P~ fo~t ~h~ bi~~ ~or rnakin~ ~uSli~ar~ ~~~+~°l~ne arte~,~r ~~o~msdeu, part af ~h~ ~~Qen up the p~ frnm Br~~c~~ay ta Spra~uue ~~n ~~i~,~al jq~~in~ p~~nam~en~, And ~w~~ the ~I~l~uan. n~taric~us ir~ its ~~~n right, e~d 8~~wmsd~s Ic+~n 1"~E ?4-A~~~ sh~,ppin~ a~~~~det~f~t~ ~imme far ru~n~rs ~~r'~~'+~, 4t~ Spo~ c~enter, ~tw~ice tt~e six~ ut and ~~atc~er~, ~'i~ h~pe ~ik~ ~P~n~~rin~ the Ustir•ers~t~ ~it}}, ~?~u~d be b!uiik ~[rd run un {~~y B. Running Clin~c, 81 1='~ ~I11~1V8E9, '1t~1° U~$1Cl~~S ~C~ h[~~~Cl~ '1f13f ~2- ~~1i1t1~1'S, ~1 r~ie~h~~e~y ea~~ af t~s~ 1~eral laan ~~e~ 7,~'DO ar~~d 1A,OQ4 runn~rs ~`~~en, Ei~~pre~ar :~otar l~n, wrtu pai~~cip~te in the e~ent ~n~y ~'~ieklev~~~ 7raffic en~~n~~r Gary th{~ yea~, ~con~inua.ng th~ and fit~~ ~dire~ f~ennaly told c~mmiss~~ner~ ~~,ntasti~c ~~a~s~~ it ~~per~- ~'N~~~ s~id he believes th~ d~ev~loper ~ced i~s 1'~~8. ~pukane's top r~, ~ho~ld be r~spansi~l~ tar ~ec~use ~f the ant't~ip~te~ will I~ '~king ! ~r~ar~cin~ the t~r~~r~sy ~urrd s~~ an~r~~F the start ~nd cli~Ec, infi~udir~t lane dc~wn the cent~~ of finf~h ~'i1l be chan~ed," ~rr~inat~r ~n~ ~eginn~ing, Jun Lynch note~, ~~ara~hor~er ~'his wi11 r~q~ireb the ~r Riv~rside and endin~ a~ ~+.~9~'~e Ho~ d~ve~~per tp spenc~ ~p- ~p~lc~n~ F'slls ~}~d., th~s ~r~~ideni and ' ~ro~iiniat~ef} #~~r,0~~, t~ul r~ar. I{l~~e, ~nd !hSi+r ~esr~'t ir~~lude ~e ~c~st af "'We'[l ~n~a~ly' h~ve ao by- 'T~e Ctinic i~ 6uv~~a~ ~nQU~,h rig~~ ~f ~~Y pe~ ~he ~iverfrar~t park ~,lfc~ I~gin Feb. ~ da~v~ Suflivan ~a d~ the ~t~er," Lynch ~id l~l~rr~day. hianda}~s antl ~~ces~ry ►~~~d~ni~g. ~u~ b~~ n~ z~e~an~ ~°i1l t~e l~t~°~en ~ an~i ' f~enraaly said the Valley park b~e l~t at~k, ~~Y N~a~1 wc~uld t~~eate sa mu~t~ ',The p~~p~e z'~~~e ~re It~tQrested thra~sgh traffic a~ a d~rect p{anni~~ s~m~e sgeri$1 ~~is~t4r~~ t~ swlt od~~a tmenEm~n~f els m r~ly t~ an ~e w~i~l bet bl~ ~~ward 1~1 _ ~ ~r ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~'~~~ _I'r~~^I~ '~',r I~~"~**,'"~ , , - w~~ua_ ~°i ~u ~ 1 il ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ I ` _ Y I ~ I I- { netr. Land rush M ~ exation talk lls ctt ann u a "I t~ifn~r we ne+~d to organize atvag +~arr~pl~ete. She [laid the ne'v~ VaUeY 87 JAG~ R''B~R'T~ a snuch more assertive pasture,"' he M~l waul~dl be c~er~l3t O'~~ ~e ~n.~w~► ~r~,wr~r.r aqlli#er. ,~io~ ~ said. 'I'hfle t~.s spo~ne Ciiy Cauncil 1+~,~vak said 1~hh~e city's suita~rle* CS~missla~aiddue~' d~ca1~~+~~~' ma~r la~c4L a t~e~r 1~►ticy c~f en- builtiable land Is gone. ~ire suggest- go t ~ c ahead, she c+ourag~ng iand arnexa~iran, ita past night's co~anef~ sesst~on: per#oxmance hs~s ~t im,~re~el d~e- a~d~►a rr~aexation. or~ a~ He se~ti~ raid ie the city p~~tur~" ~n has ~~I ~inY pro~bl,~' they w~'"~ ~~t ,~cid~za g as t~y c3~d. t}t~ ~#~~r v+~iopers, svught-after asse~.s to off~ar deveT- #n h d~~, I thia~]~ t~'~ ~z'+~. t~~ vvl~~t~ '~irt,u~.y e~►ery annexat[oa at- o~~ which the cvunty d~s nat ~h~ ~u~s#~e o# the 1~~~~ ia ~~r ~~Cl~ ~ ~"eCi3flt ~fe8~rs ~la3 13+~@I3 ~,p~l~e8$. H!~ 1l~,C[1et'~ 1~ateT 8IId 3eWI'~l"' ~t~~ ~.[t'L~.#~.IIt !~81i] ~l~ ~3, l~1+~11~`~ hat~1~ng with cat~nct3~~'c~ered ~de- 6ervices. an,~ i ~iin~ the der►~~~~mect~t ~f the iaya, t~hr~cal roadbl~ksrais+~d by Ba,~k fn July 19'~"~, ~Tar~~ S. Black ~r~~y ~Iell i~ ~tnat p8~i~t~+~r I+oca- ogpments, tim~~sum'~" studies appeared trefa~re the cauncil ~ a by the tounc~ atui ea~ce ~e b~ea,r- sumraer ~aight aad sai+d buildable tfon ~ ~ct t~~ tgoingt~~ to h~acityve c~~' a ~treinesdous i !~ok~e nv. ' t~~i withir~ the city limit.~ Is °~ir#t~~- ,~e ,~e,~t.ral buslnesa ~st~er~,.~• 1~Tow, howevar, the eou~tcil i~ gy no~►~e~tent. ,u,~port for Na~rak*s propo~, a1u~d'by a hu~+~ ~D-~~re r~~iQna1 B3ack ce1~d f~+r "aa a~stiv+e wilth empi~e~~~ r~a a~~tt~a ~a~e~ ~npp~g c~►~r pianr~ed by c~evel- ~,licy ~,f s~eacktic~a.,, f~m other mem~re ~ t~ cv~c~ a~r ,~a~~nes S. B~lae~C #+~r the Spo- 5xnce Ble~ck's appea~'ance, ev'~r- ~xt~er~e1 is~t~re~d tm ~ ,~n!'l VL~-e~►. l~' !~'~DI11~~U'C~p ot8~ ~ a] 3+f?rig, I~a1~1~1t C~]1 R1~II~]Eatio11 d~1E8~:1flII~ ~ sche~;I~+~If~ ~4 1~. _ B~~Ap~~ ~1ave ~CIT I378d8 ~fefO~ r~ ►'I gu~ss w$ ~ere U~'~ ~A3f4~ the City Caunc~. The rm+~Bt r~ec+e~st Z. Gut~ie. "It is #he '+e3►." ~ee~ o~ t~is r~~n Sob Andr~ ~s~d 1~ = on$, +.nc1uding S~~at ~.Tnlkmit~ ~ras ~exat,ion to the eity of a~ r~- +~tf~r$gree~, ancil~~ ;"~'V'e l~~'k bui~dgb~,~ ~ and ian~uding the Chana~r af Com- ~re tr~~t sc~~thwe~t ~ aS F'~~e ~i1+~ ~uerce wb~ich, Iimuma, ~r~cul.d hawe a l~d. We ~.e t~ao~ laud if ~ex- uPraiar~,e, 1~etiti~rnners wecr~e V~1'Llly~►~ ect tO ~,G~v," , ~d ~s ~u~ ~a~ca~rrr~4ve~^~t~i~ t~.ti~~ H. ~3a~ntz, B. ~t[cB~am► ~.nd p Hower,►er. d4~~ted ~ ~ p~r- a$ we tica,,, ~aaid Ma~ror ~ ~3ait a~t ceat tijur+~ c#tad 43 a#Qvwratown Gla~~lys Siy~gar. '~t w~as ap$~~►~ b~' Monday night"s - C1ty _ Councii the councik, but rrrore thasi IL ya8r if ~ii io~. _ meet~n$. : cvn~u~~c+~s ucc~aa~d. Go~,c~i~~ra~na ~~r~y+~ U. S~~- ~ M~,ger Te~ L. No-vawt N+~vak ~icl c3ty bu~td.it~g tc~n lang an opp~an~t oi i~ewrays 'r~#~~ ot th r~~a~e,.ip,~ the counky "4'c4t~11~~Y issicane M~~ ~~~ts mq~e ~tr~ngent than ,~tu'ough cit4ea, s~►id ~~~^~g ~n' t~,t v~ry ~~r h~d ~fv~n ~ ~+a-a~~~~ , ~ . ,~i~y, ~ar ~x~rr~pl~. t~~„~ fcrll~w ir+~wa s~ w~.e'h ~driv~ , ;u~ro~,~, ~~r~tat Brpac~ o a~~t;wal~*~►~me~t ~d i~l~llic~ttt~wan.~ ,ui~~,res t~rb~. ~Iecker l~eierre~ asphalt t:~ o~n stre~+~ts F~ a~'~on ~om ci~ee~s ~~ld p rta~ger said ~ ~v~vn- vela ~ z~a~tin,g #hey ca~t- unc.iLman Jaar~es ~m wit~ d~ p~ ~4 did ~~t b~i~Ve ~~ew r~+~1~ ~ , aider~ kt easier to L+~d in ~e cr~unt ,~auld I.~„ ~,~.au~e. ~~+arc~ c~ ~he d~~ $r~~ a ~tu~cil~aox~n lVi~ar~b~ T. S~an- ~tWe bave oppo~ni~es to a~anex ~d+~ r~re~ b~ ald~mecl af# ~ ~ p~~.r,, ~„~for~ t.tue' coua~ty rort he said. "'RV~it au!t,b~orl~,3► ~ by t~ ~~ev~ ee~~cr, ~.~ent ~ c~~~+a~a~~ D~c~n+~~y ~~rnia~ w have to te1l ~ ~n~'' ~'w ]:c~~s~~ ~er~~t ~it~.- 4u~,r~a the o,n the e~►PP~~ b~ ahoppiag c~#.ex lae 1~ ti ~ ~ ~ Qr~#3 ~ ~CII~Q~ r ~'lt1~~'~.' R .;There ~ra~ pv v+~~8„be~- .~~1~[~ay t~igh+~`s c+~uitea m+~at- Navak sai~! "`ue~ b*~v+ae i~r~ the rc~~, ` ~ discr~eei ~r rtle ~aF- the city shnuld g~'!e+ater use cf ;~qr~a1~ ~ ~+ed c~~ me~- „year~~, at~ the cou~'thouu..~e. ~,~po~s~d' b~:1',~ city ~ ad~'~ & ea~- ~;e ~,~d ~~ty $n~ count~ o~fi+~tal~, SP'okane ~unty Rs~aal P1~r~~ . p~e~+sive p_ ~an rv~~icl~: c+r~ f~►r •-,~n+ce Ar~~uat, l~~~re h~~ a~irat ~`onferyeaeo, a~,1+ stt~g c~ti°a1 t~~~s dis#ac~t. ,ag~,$m+~t ~vhich ia csUed the ~ ~th city and cock?~►!t~y ~iciils. He t '~4The s~tttion this mor~n ~Y the ,,~~a A,re~, Comprehanslve ~"la:n. ssid va~ous gvve~~tal agen. 0 ' ~ c+~~nmisaleaners} m all bd ~ies are takino Act~rxs a1:~att d+ai- 8 #e~O'tiAi tQ ~lQt ~ ! g8~it~ I on ~l13 the pli.''~r~►, ~ld~~~~3rsI1. ,~B S1~'i,gY~ ~+E~ll ~E',~~ ly~~ ~'lllt ~~g@ U~t1 ~e Cit,'. ~1e A ~aid a~e p~an~oin~ c+~af~nce [n N~'~. asked ~c~om~ID~iesio~r$ t~' de1~" a'~- ~gioaa1 vap:titou~ ci~► a~ad K~.Wc~ a ~~n taf ~ saJ.es ta: qy}~ ~+t ~ II~w sr~~1 ~r~l ga ti~ca kh+~ rc~a11 und.l mor`e ~,~ut f~,~,~t u~t o~r~rec~~z~ees mi~~[ the c~r,~,~. ~~+4'f3~+4f14 y~p~a ii1p~ co,,}~4 .'~l+e f~~I ~tp~~J~'r L.+.1ty ea17~ ~ Int1I ~eA S1ouLi,ty+s giR/~lkf+i~ fLLiJd, CVii,n\ril and S~kRze 4'~e~Yb~k~ ~VLiYia V~~ M+ Vla...~ .T+~ . ~Vh~ ~t r~t1u1+d bye Se~'t ~ lr'over" U Plan~ng ~:onfet'~ee. L'GLi+ r~ts,~F s~~r! ~vw~k, i"+~i~1~S ~ can- ~ t]~ r~~ wea~e ir~ ~e +~it~~~ts.i€ ~t ~+he als~ said the 2{?8 '~f a'~er 5fi.udy. ~FuVak "s~ tho ~Y ~ttn`afc~ean- w~ch ~ atternpdg #~a determine ~cts main#ayneti by vsTious c ty , ~C+DO ~ v~►~ ne~ r c a~ r r~er~~ l w~ i e ther t he a r ea a ~ tnderg~ u~►d ~ ~ 3e eai d l eouatyt~e ~ a~snnfnn~; c bi),+~di~ies. k~ ~ a r d~ ~ F~ #ia l ~ d evel c~ pm~t n~nd a a~esulting w,~ter su 1~plY ~ b ekr~ g ~fected bY m t m~ e its d+ e c i~ i w o aL hen ~c~~a~e ia L~~~, ~n~at Spokana V"ay atptic tanka, is not . r , . . . . ; . ~ . , r _ . . s f-or y s surve ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . , __m it~l ~a.# ~ a.r•.•alnV A4it3i ^Lkl'hiP.'n with ~1:ry- i OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPORMNG L.OVN'1 1,~ WASHINVTON . Inter-o'Ff4ce Communic>otion From ` o - Subject I ; - , ~ - • - x` - - ° ~ - a~i ~ ~ t ~ . ~ a ~ , - • ~ _ , ' r • ' ~ • • / (3 r~~~~...J,~'y~~~ _tCrt L £ ~ ~~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1+'2. . ~ . fOfifl!4 327-C,R. SPOK!'XNG CLIUNf !x WASHINGTON G'ate - , ~ 4 ~e"~ Inter-affite Communication From 2?d ~~~jec: ~M1C f ~r f ~r ~ ~'/,j~~ ✓ . ( ~6# J~"` ~j C~ )"/d ~ 4",~/" ~ ~ ~ R Jl~ fd J ~ ! ~ ~l t~,J' ~ ~ r ~ ~ . ~s ~ .0-'s .Ih ~.'faeor ~ Facrn 327}-C.R. 'I kv,~f R° ~ . rIo ~ . • _ 7411,0 --*7 .S C?. . . v ~va~ 7 4F Id~7L°. O!7/ _ f y ~r O n7 S/? D T.~~o %!'1 4 ~ t"'~sl ~e~ r 1 ~ Q S Oa 7Ag o h y ~~l h r S S e v f/j d ~/'04 d wQy / h ! C' f ,,S L~ t ~v /y 1 ~~rfse r e Gvr~ ei 3~ yo ss~',~~~ ~va/ A~~ /y oss~'.1~< ~vfvr_ +c -Si'~i { Cwc cl a ~ - - rf;ss,~0 07 -74 e- hl~ 0/ 4 o,' pD S.Si'4~1/'~i'J S/ . / Z hD S~g~~a ~S 4'df~ q d4w6l, ~Xi fS - - - ~ / 1 4 e y/ Jc? Y' C~ .R r- ~ to eS 10y7.S 0!' O_tv r q Q A r v v.t_ : 0 ¢ ;fh ~r O"a 70te mc~t ~ . LG_~ G~ . ~ ~ q ~j' P ir. ♦ ! ~ - - - _ _ P ~ • i 1 • • • 1 ~ + y 4IN TS - - , ~ ,.~,2.,~ K,%~ . : ' ~ _ N . 1 . a~. ' _ ~ t4 S7J-P-f' . y~~ - , 8~~s'^' f ~ Ale- s,~Z ~77 1 1 y ~9~ - - - M ~ v ~ v ~ ° ~ : ~ _ _ S ~ r ~ ~ v e 0/7T /Nvr 717 ~ , ~ ~ ~ , 9~~16~77__ _ _~.~~i ~~i ~Q _ ~R_ _ n S= ' •~P' ✓ _ ~6r?4!2 ~ 9/~..3 7 4 W ~3/o lV ~ p/2 vA r? v G /O_ ,j 112 3 /7T vq~ 1~~ - SJg -rZqo / e 1 ' , ~ -ab Rd z 3;?7 - R-W ~/edr _ ~/UI'Cs - -_._.~~L~~~ J~~i • ~ ~ ~ '51431ZT _Tl , Ato~ i"o.~c~ 30 6 2. ; Z 4 8'~ L 77 ~/;Z 10/7 7 .r_c2.gL ~ w_~.~ _ e ~ v , ' ~ ~ /oJ^2.. !Q~ Y ~,..~~✓a .,~~/..2. 1 i I ~ .w .w ~ .r`~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~o_ r~.~..1~ ~a _ . ' ' . I l I . ~ y •~-rf- r ~.w n , - - - - - - - - - - - - - . ` , ~ , ~ ► 1 - ~ i- - - ' " ( 1 ~ ~ q ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ e•~ - - ~ _ - _ ~ _ _ , _ _ ~ .s. _4 ~ .r.....~,._= ""f t~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ r... i C V N 1 1 « , 1 { l, r ~ J ~ _ c y ; ,~.e t y ~ . '~;=,~:r~:.~ I , > q ~ ~b~ 775 P X y~~ r . / / 7 V . ' ! -7 7 7-6 1 q C v •r V / ~ ~ V ~ m ~ c ..r . ~ u . ~ ~ ~a • ' !f ~ T~» 74 4if - ~ - - - . S v ~ _ ~ ~ t~ A v . ^ ~ y 1 %V 4 ~...a.~.- . f1f V-d.z F-~~ ^ va w ~ k"Q~ l l /~S.,S~~~ a~~__ ve_.~___~_a~.. • _ dis-~ ~ ~f ob v~t•~.~ e ~r~ _ , , _ ~ . ~ _ _ _ . ~ _ _ ~ 6 ~ , , -~e?w-e-f &2 _ . r 5/p r Q cj ~ _ .s~ ✓ - e ~ o.tl ~ r`_! ~4~L.~ .a _ _ _ . a ~ _7 - _ _ 1 r . ~ - - , S~ Rd . _ y _ _ _ _ _ 3 ~ m ~ . ~ _ ~ / I a s-07 s Er Ca c7 61( w A/~ 5/ r G 4 ~5 l i w ~ C gh ~J ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - . _ ~ _ . _ r _ J'I, ~ ~ v v s~ ; ~ ~ a ~1 M ~ - ~ - - _ _ - - - - - S A ~ i ~ ~ ~ • . ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~.-.....r-....e ~ ~ ~ t t ~ ' - i h I , + r tat ^ ~ i~ ~ t ~ t ~t,L+ ' 1~ ' ` ~f}-ai~ orr':aE oF COIJNTY ENSIiVE_LR ROBERT 5 TURPVER p~ ~ g•w COUNTY ENGINEER i~ SPOMANC COVC+tY COLRT HOUSE August 30, 1978 Mso Dorothiy Riegel North 704 Conklin Veradale, Washington 99037 Dear Mso Riegel : Enclosed ie a liat 9howing the accident hietory you requested for the varioue intersections of Sullivan Road, Spregue AvenueD Broadway and Mission. Very truly youra, Robert S. Turner, P.E. County Engineer Bob Brueggeman Engineer eg Encl. ' E ~ ~ -:-1lyc ~ ` . i~, ~ -~.s~•_~" ' if 7e " 74; , ~ ~ S ~ / ~ Q•, h.~ , ~ _ _ . _ I, } d*A- ~ S ~ v r h ~ y A v _ - . - ~ ~ ~ - r C p ~V4h ~v c' 14 V . ~ vV / • ~ Il vQ i ! Gl 1/ - ~ - - . _ rt . ~ . ~ / UQ U I~. ~ l~4.~ /7, s S/ o~ _-4 t~ z , s r~ ~ S vll. - l•~ 4 v i 5~vr a q ve l~ ^ ~ ~!Pi . ~e c ~n ~ ~ _ ~ ~ . y J-Z-- - - - _ rs . 1 S ~ r Q y t/ r ✓ ~ ~ O h ~t ~ ~ R~ _ _ . . . _ ~T _ _ _ .L _ - tj~ ~p rRc~u~ l'~or ~ - - - • 4✓ ~ v e 0, 9 C G ~ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ ~ w _ ~ - - - 1 ~ _ . ~ ~I ~ ~~a ~ ~ J . _ - _ •y , _ _ _ 1 ~ y . A /'v )ir 4r- ~ - ~ ~ ~r e p ~ w .2 ~ ✓ ' ~ ~"~~0 ~ ~ ~P~ _ _ ~ - - - - - _ i T AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 22, 1978 TELEPHONE NO. 456-22 % 1 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, Sep[embec 22, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Piace• Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE REGL.ASSTFTCAT_TON 9„ ZE-I 42-77 , AQticult ural to ,omm _r _ia 1 a. Location: Section 13,Township 25 N., Range 44 , E, W Vr PARCEL A: That part of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13 described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E.~• the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which is the true POB; thence N alonq the E side of County road 649.32'; 1/4 of said Section 13; thence S 89°37E 504 thence S 649.32'; thence S 89°51'W along the 1V line of County road 530, 3' Mcr or less to the POB. PARCEL B: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feer E of the W 1/4 corner of Section 13-2 5-44; thence S 89 ° S 1' E along the N line ot County Road 540.3' to the true POB; thence N 11305 .25' to a point; thence S 89 ° 57' E 519 . 3 6' to a point; rhence S 0°3 1/4'W 306 .12' to a point on che N line of County Road; thence N 89 ° 51'W alonq said N line of County Road 518 . 08' to the POB. PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/2 of the 1WW 1/4 of Section 13-25-44 described as follows: Beginninq 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the w'_ ~ corner of said section; thence S 89 ° 51' E along the N line of Broadway Road iVo. 443 for 1, 058.38',to the true POB; thence N 0°03 1/2'E 1, 306.12` to the N line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of said section; thence S 89°57'E alonq the U lfne 519,36; thence S 0°07'W 1,306.99' to the N line of said road; thence N 89°51'W alonq the N line 518 , 63' to the tnie POB; excepting that part of ~h:: r/w of PSH No. 2. 8L2 , that portion of the S 1/2 of the !V 1/2 of Sectfon 13-25-44 lying Sly of the Sly line of PSH No, 2, described as follows PARCEL D• Beqinninq at a point 20 feet N and 30 feec of the W 1/2 corner of said Section 13, and rvnning thence S1 89 ° S 1' E, along the N line of Broadway Avenue 2, 612 . 62' to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence N 0°14'E 1,308.73'; thence S 89°SI'E 519.36'; then_- S 00 17 1/2'W 1, 309 . 60' to a point on the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence N 89 ° 51'W along said Broadway Avenue 518 . 08' to the POB; except the R/W conveyed to Spokane Valley Irrigation Co.; and excepc rne E 2 00' thereo`_ conveyed to Highway Chapel, Inc. PARCELE_ Beqinninq at a Point 20 feet iV and 30 feet F of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and running [hence S 89°S1'E, along t-+e N line of Broadway Avenue, 1, 576.46 feet to the true PC'B of the tract of lanc herein described; thence N 0°07'E 1, 306.99' to the N line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of said Section 13; thence S 89°57'E 1, 038.72'; thence S 0°14'W, 1, 308 . 73' to the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence N 89 ° S 1'W, along said Broadway Avenue 1, 6.16' to the POB; excep[ r/w conveyed to Sookane Valley Irriqation Company. r~ - ~ • ~ ~ _ , . ~ r • ~ ~ ZE-142- 77 CONDTTIONS FOR APPROVAL VALLEY MALL 1, Developer shall comply with the rules and regulatlons of the Spokane County Health Dlstrlct as they ex[st at the tlme of constrvctlon. All necessary Heatth Distrtct permlts shaJl be obtalned prtor to lssuance of Bulldtng Pecmlts. ~ 2. Any sewage treatment plant shall be located at least 500 feet from resldences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject propecty. 3. Flre malns and hydrants shall be tnstalled tn accordance with Spokane County Flre Marshal's requtrements. 4. The sponsor shall develop the praperty generally ln accordance with the concept pres ented to the Spoka ne County Planning Commis s lon . R/llnor vartatlons, when approved by the Zoning Adminlstrator, wlll be pecmltted ' lncluding, but not llmlted to the followlnq changes: Bullding location; ~ bullding matertals; bullding slzes~q~ound cover;,landscape plans; and general allowable uses of the permltted zone. All varlattons must conform to regulatlons set forth ln the Spokane County Zoning Ordlnance. The orlglnal lnten of the development plan s~all be ma talned. ~ ~ ~ ~l .J1•~~^' 5Os'v 't5X.V- v+U4 5. In the event substantlal development of the subject property ln accocdance with the development plan has not commenced by Uctober 1, 1985, then and ln that event the zoning of the subiect property shall revert to agricultural zoning. 6. If a"208" Water Management F'lan is ln effect at the tlme of butlding permlt submtsslon, the developer sha!l comply with all rules, regulattons, or guldellnes for surface water runoff management. Such methods as seml-pervlous pavtng and/or oll separators shall be used for packing lot runoff dlsperslon a s requ lred by the Spokane Utllltles and/or Eng lneer's Depactment. 7. Interior drlveways and packtng areas shall be paved. 8o The landscape and berming plan shall show speclfic detall and be accompanled by performancel bond !n an amount to be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Admtntstrator prtor to the lssuance of bullding permlt s . 9. Berming shall be erected commensurate with the phased constructlon on the subject propertyo As construction commences on the project, becrning along Broadway shall progress therewlth so that berming wlll be ln place a dlstance east on 8roadway 100 feet beyond the Easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. - I- o i . , ' 10. Roadway lmprovements to Broadway shall lnclude curbs and sldewalks on both the north and south sldes of the streeto ~ 11. RIGHT OF WAY - Offstte rlght-of-way requlred for roadway lmpcovements shall be acqulred by the I3eveloper of Valley Mall at no expense to Spokane County, The off-slte clght-of-way shall lnclude the following: a) Along t he Ed st slde of Sulllvan R+oad from the North llne of the Valley Mall north to I-90.-~ €rorn Broadway south a distance of 330 feet . ~ ~ b) Along the South slde of Broaddvay from Sullivan Road East to the East property llne of the Valley Mall. ~ c) Conklln Road from Hroadway Avenue South for 150 feet. On-slte rlght-of-ways for the constructlon of requlred roadway improvernents shall be provlded by the Developer at no expense to Spokane County. The on-slte rlght-of-way shall lnclude the following: 1) Along the East slde of Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to the Nocth llne of the Valley Mall. 2) Along the North slde of Broadway Avenue from Sullivan Road to the Ea st l lne of the Valley Mall. 12, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - The County's current project on Sullivan Road will reconstuct Sullivan Road fcom Broadway Avenue to SR-90 to four lanes lncluding channellzed left turn lanes at Mlsslon Avenue and Broadway Avenue and wlll constnlct a new updated slgnal system at the 13roadway and Sullivan lntersectlon. The County's current project wlll provide sufflclent addltlonal capaclty on Sullivan Road and at the Broadway-Sulllvan lntersectlon to adequately handle the lnltlal phase development of the proposed proiec[. Improvement of Broadway Avenue to a four lane wlth channellzed left turn faclllty from the Broadway and Sullivan lntersection to the major Broadwey Avenue entrance of the development shall be the responstbll.lty of the Developer and shall be accompllshed ln connectlon wlth the development of the Lnltlal phase of the propased project. Complete roadway tmprovements requlred due to development requtred due to development of the second phase of the proposed proiect wlll be the responslblllty of the Developer at no expense to Spokane County and wlll tnclude: , from I-90 to e pofat 330 feet south of Broadwey - a) Sullivan fZaady~ Reconstruct from four lanes pius channellzed left turn lanes at Ivilsston and at A_roadway-l ~x lanes plus a double left turn lane~ 4.4ha.. 11al,Ley MOR. Posslble frlctlon lane on the East si af Sullivan Road from Droadway Avenue North thru the Valley Mall development. - 2 - . p . b) Broadway Avonue i - Wlden to four lanes wlth elther channellzed left turn lanes or two way left turn lane as dlrected by the County Engtneer. Speclal trafflc flow channellzatlon shall be deslgned at ~ both Moore and Conklln Road to prohlblt dlroct access of the ~ Valley Mall trafflc lnto the residentlal area9. Thc: roadway [mprove- 4 ments shall extend from Sulllvan ftoad East through the Valley ~ Mall development wlth requlred tapers. An addltlonal frlctlon lane may be requlred from the maln entrance West to Sulllvan Road o x ~ a 13. TftAFFIC SIGNALS - The Developer's cost of lmproving or oonstructing trafflc slgnals at the following lntersectlons wlll be computed upon the ~ percent of trafflc generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwlse noted, ~ ~ Sulllvan and Sprague p. Sulllvan and Mlsslon a Sprague and I'lora Broadway and Flora ~ Sulltvan and Broaduvay The total cost of expanslon and reconstructlon due to y Phase Two road widening shall be at the Developer's o eapen5e. Broadway and Main Valley Mall Ent rance ~ Total cost by Developer a~ ~ Trafflc gc:nerated by the Valley Mall may necessltate the widening of o°c Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall development East to Flora Road and ~ Flora Road froni Broadway South to Sprague. The tmpact of the Valley Mall ~ cannot be determined at thls tlme. However, the Developer should be ; prepared fnr future parttclpatlon and sharing of constrvctlon costs for ~ these two roads if trafflc projectlons from future phases of the project o justtfy sald tmprovements. ~ w O T 1 1 I - 3 - April 1$, 1978 Page 1 of 2 To: Spokane County Planning Commission From: Gary W. Kennaly, Planning and Traffic Divisaon Engineer, Road Department Subject: DRAFT EIS "Valley Mall" The review of the above draft EIS has been completed and ae have the followz.ng corriments for your consideration: B. 3.1 a- ESciBting Conclitions Should also address present capacity deficiency of Sullivan Road between Broadway and I-90 and that present fixed time traffic signal at Sullivan and Broadway result6 in over capacity situations under existing traffic volume6. B. 3•1 c- Measures to Mltipte Adverse Impacts P. 83 Statement suggests posaible four lane improvement from Sprague Avenue north to I-90. Projected traffic volumes indicate that between Broadway Avenue and I-90, four lsne section would be over-capacity and six lane fe►cility wou],d be juetified. Additional right of way would be required in order to construct this needed improvement. P. 84 Statement suggests possible improvement of Broadway extended eaet to Barker Roade Significant purchasea of rigtits of way aad costly improvement of the road to arterial standards would be requ.ired to realf ze this proposale P. 85 Statemeat regardi.rig the needed improvement of Broadway did not indicate the emeting eub-staadard 40 foot right of way on Broadway Avenue and that additional right of a►ay rrould have to be obtained to reelize this proposal. GfENERAL COMMENT REGARDIMG PROJmCTID TRAFFIC AND IICPROVEMMS Based on the exi.6ting rights of way end present physical 2.mprovements along the Freeway commerciel zone of Sulliven Road, the possibility of bndening Sullivan Road to handle the projected traffic accessing the progosed Bite, appears very difficult and may not be practical to ach.ieve. In ax~y event it would be the total responsibility of the developer to provide any improeements to the emstang and propoaed system in order to provide adequate and safe access to the propoeed Bite development. / Page 2 o f 2 SubJect: DRAFT EIS "Velley Mall" Because there is no guarantee of County funds and due to the present unsatisfied needs for exssting County funds, the County will not obligate funds for improvesnents of the type required to serve new private deeelopmentsa Without the i.mplementatlon of the recognized needed improvements to mitigate adverse impacts, adequate and safe access to the site roill not be available and this Department would bave to recommend denial o f the zone change wi.th v:-7 such time as adequate and eafe accesellrovided via an 3.mproved roadmay systeme , 1 O T o - - CmIumn o_ rix 5P@hM@ , ~ TRAb$PpRTATaON STUOV DOYISBOa Pnone 509-456- 4a2s ~ ~ September 26, 1977 . ~ r T Mr. James Rolva Hayxqorth & Anderson W. 621 Mallon Spokane, Wa. 99201 Re: Proposed Shopping Center at Intersection of Sullivan Road and Broadwaq Avenue Dear Jims This letter will serve as a revision of my letter to you dated September 13, 1977. Per our phone conversations to change the assumed location of trip origins to 67% westj337o east of Sullivan Road, I am enclosing a sketch detailing the revised distributiono The remainder of information as contained in the September 13 letter is the same. Very truly yours, ' - Robert A. Vau han, P.E. Transportation Study Director (Designee) Ravfjf Encs / cc c Robert Turner Fred Dayharsh ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E. Terry Clegg 5PRD,N6 ~ S E P 2 8 1977 AODAESS REPLY TO SPOKANE REGIONAL PIANNING CONFERENCE, RQOM 353 CITY HALL, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ SPOKANE REGIONAL PLANNIIVG CONFERENCE TRANSPORTATION STUOY DIVISION 6~soo TR EiVT 7600 . t 894 O ''~Or~ •~j9 x3 ~~'O x°ty 's~ - ~ . -I_ g~ s,o7s 7is4. . ~ ,~o 1 ~0 90 ~as39 O 6 , k. N ~ MISSION m _ _ . _ + 712 + a WK -DAY TRIP ENDS 27,100 tn PROPOSED SHOPPING ti CENTER BROADWAY z,sso zpso . +988 +113 ~ 0 (0 M ~~o + SPRAGUE ; . IQ340 91$40 + 4A I 6 0 ~ +554 LEGEiVD + . Z XXX = 1975 AVERAGE DA1LY TR'AFFIC(AD' ~ + XXX = ESTIMATED DAILY INCREASE DUE ~ - TO FULL OPERATION OF THE . j PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER N :D C!~ NOT TO SCAI.E • L O,lU~UU ~ R o s U Vm m' s ~ LlUuJI~~ ~1U T a ~U~ ~ s~ ~~~,+1 TRANSPORTAt14DR STiIdY D6VIS40N Pnol,E s09 456 412"~ Septembet 13, 1977 rir. James Kolva Hayworth & Andersan W. 621 Mallon Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Revised Trip Estimates for Proposed Cast Valley Shopping Center Dear Air. Kolva: In accordance with our discusszon of August 30, 1977, I understand that the size and internal layout of the proposed shopping centeY on the northeast corner of Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue has been revised. Your request for revised trip estimates are presented in this letter. ~ The data upon which the trip estzmates are based are as follows: 13uildzn~ Area Gross Square Feet r Six Individual Commercial Buildings (Southwest corner of Site) 60,000 Central Retail Mall ;039000 Ten Individual Office Buildings (East end of Site) 679000 Total Building Area 8309004 Land Area Total Land Area 70 Acres Denand Market area equally split east and west of Sullivan Road Parking Tota1 Parking Spaces 49570 These data were combined caith trip generation relationships from the 1976 Institute of Transportation Engineers reporfi Trip Generation and with results of Spokane Area 1965 and 1975 Origsn-Destination Travel Surveys to arrive at the following estimates: ~ Average 24 Average 24 Weekday Hour Weekday Hour Saturday Peak Mour Trips to Shopping Comples 13,550 16,950 1,355 Trips from Shopping Comples 139550 169950 19355 279100 339900 2,710 ADDRESS REPLY TO SPOKANE REGIONAL PLANNtNC CQNFERENCE R(?ON1 353 CITY HALL SPOKANE lNASHINGT0s° 99"C1 ~ Mr. James Kolva September 13, 1977 Page 2 These estimates assume that the potential demand exlsts for an additional shopping center of thas magnitude in the Spokane Valley. Attached is a sketch illustrating the 1975 daily traffic (ADT) and the ex- pected increase in ADT due to the full operation of the proposed Shopping Center for roadways in the immediate vicinity. The forecast increases are i based first on the assumption that 50°!o of the demand market will be east ~ a and 50~'o west of Sullivan Road. Secondly, it was assumed that trip attractions ~ would be a function of where the existing population is located, the distri- bution ot future population growth, and the quality of the roadway leading to the center. ~ ~ The increase in traffic volumes showrz on the attached sketch are for the proposed ~ Shopping Center. No es*imate was included to account for the portion of the traffic entering/exiting the Center that would be captured from existing traffic on Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue. Hence, thxs estimate represents a"caorst" condition. In order to estimate the "capture rate", the market analyses must be studied. ~ _ I refer you to tJayne Gruen's leCter of October 5, 1976 to James S. Black where some additional planning considerations were discussed. ~ If you havE further questions please contact me. Very truly yours, ' ~ Robert A. Vaughan, P.E. Transportation Study Director (Designee) RAV/jf cc: Robert S. Turner I'red Dayharsh ~ E. Terty Clegg s I~ ~ s ~ 1 ~ C° ~ ^f1 i 4 t PLAtVNING DEPARTMEIVT ~ - • 1 ' PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET ' PNONE 458-2274 , SQOKANE WASHINGTON 99201 SPOKAnL CONnir GpURT npUSG april 4, 17 78 TO; All Recipients of Draft EIS for Valley Mall Shopping Cznter FRQ1Vi. Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director..~ ~ Responsible Official for Spokane County SUBJECT: Review Commentary on the Draft EIS for the Valley Ma11 Shopping Center Pursuant to WAC 19 7-10-455 (1), we are extending the review period for the draft EIS until April 19, 19 78 . Our response rate has been ve ry low, only 3 responses. I urge your agency,, if it has not already done so and is an agency of jurisdiction or expertise, to review and comment as pertinent, relevant to 1J1rAC 197-10-500, 510 and 520. WAiC 197-10-545 clz arly state s the effect of "no co,mme nt s". Revtew comments are to be addressed to Thomas G. Mosher. ~ Fg D-/TGM/dj ~ ~ , , - ai ~ - 4 j ~ , ~1 Q t ~ i i ti o ' ~ 7 r i PLANIVIIUG DEPARTMENT BROAQWAY CENTAE BUILOING N 721 1EFFERSON STR£E7 ; t PHONE 456•2205 L a.✓~ ~«1tLU ~r~` r 1~ SPOKANE, NASHINGTON 99260 -L u,~o L r SPOKANC COUNiY G4U14T ►IOUSC P L A N N I N G R E P 0 R T Date: OCTOBER 3, 1985 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: Spobcane County Planning Department SUBJ ECT: Rezone #ZE-142-77; Agri cul tural to Commerci al Change of Conditions #ZE-142A-77; Regarding #6 of the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated J uly 16, 1979 1. GENERAL IPIFORMATION Appl i cant: VALLEY MALL ASSOC IATES ~qent: Dwi ght Hume Pro osal: te Size - Approximately 72 Acres. A request for a Change of Condition which states, "In the event substanti al devel opment (the constructi on of the Mal l) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to consider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural." Note: "The applicant is hereby requesting a six (6) year extension ot time to allow the economy to support a regional shopping center. No other conditions relative to the site plan and land use are anticipated for change." Location: ie site is generally located east of and adjacent to Sullivan Road and north of and adjacent to Broadway Avenue in Section 13-25-44. isplo, ~ . ~ ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 II. SITE ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan: MIMR G`UW41RC IAL and SUBURBAN Categori es - Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary - Inside Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary ~ - Inside Urban Impact Area (UTA) Boundary This zone change approval to Commercial for a Shopping Center predates the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; and, in fact, this property was subsequently designated as Major Commercial in recognition of this project at the time the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Buffering to adjacent uses was identified as a mitigating measure within the Environmental Impact Statement and required by the Board of County Cornmissioners' action to approve the project. Zonin : ~zisting on SITE: Commercial (established 1979) and within: Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone To the NORTH: Freeway Commercial (established 1968) I-90 (Freeway) To the SOUTH: Agricultural (established 1942) Two-Family Residential (R-2) (established 1970) Single Family Residential (R-1) (estab. 1976) To the EAST: Agricultural (established 1942) To the WEST: Freeway Commercial (established 1970) Local Business (established 1978) Land Use: Existing on SITE: Undeveloped To the NORTH: Red Lion and Undeveloped To the SOUTH: Single Family Residential, Fire Station and Pasture To the EAST: Two Churches To the WEST: Offices, Restaurant, Motel and Single Family Residential H i s toZ-i*s project was before the Planning Commission several times in 1977 and 1978. An Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) was prepared for the proposed Shopping Center which addressed the potential impacts upon the area dealing with land use; change in character and compatibility, buffering, ecomonics, alternative uses, increased traffic and accident potential, circulation patterns, noises, new light sources and aesthetics, access to the Freeway, air emissions, water and sewerage concerns, and inducement for more intensive land uses on adjacent properties. The E.I.S. recommended mitigating measures and conditions of approval addressing these concerns and was attached to the proposed development. The Board of County Commissioners approved the proposal, subjec t to development standards and conditions of approval, many of which were recommended within the E.I.S. The proposal was appealed to Superior Court which upheld the approval of the zone change and conditions attached thereto. , ZONE CHANGE OF CONOITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) History (continued) Tne Planning Commission required compliance with fourteen (14) restrictions or conditions which were incorporated within the zone change dealing with the various potential impacts identified by the E.I.S. as stated above. The Board of County Commissioners' order affirming the decision of the Planning Commission contained nineteen (19) numbered conditions, some of which are amnplified by sub-paragraphs dealing with the various potential impacts identified by the E.I.S. and as stated above. Chan of Condition: nn reference fo these restri cti ons and condi ti ons; I tem #6 of the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated J uly 16, 1979, states: "In the event substantial development (the construction of the Mall) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to consider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural". In tnis regard, the applicant is now requesting an extension of time for six (6) years, (October l, 1991), to allow the economy to support a regional shopping center. No other conditions relative to the site plan and land use are anticipated for change. III. PLANNING SUMMARY The Planning Department has accepted this extenison of time application with the clear understanding that the topic of discussion at the public hearing is to be solely that of the zoning renewal, and that an additional public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Corr~nittee is to be required for detailed use and site plan review as well as a SEPA Determination prior to application for any building permits on the subject property. This stipulation is made in recognition of a nearby 230-Acre development, (Sullivan Park by R. A. Hanson), that anticipates multiple uses, including a regional retail shopping center, light industrial park, hotel, and open space access. Incorporated within this Planning Report are conditions that may be added by the commenting departments to any development on the subject property and serve as information to the applicant for future consideration. J, . , ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 IY. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. That a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be required to review detailed site development plan(s) as well as a SEPA Determination made by the Planning Department prior to application for any building permits on the subject property. 2. That at the public hearing required in #1 above, the Hearing Examiner Committee may modify, delete or add to the existing conditions as contained within the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated July 16, 1979, and those mitigating measures as identified within the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for this proposal except as may be modified by the Board of County Commissioners' Findings and Order dated J uly 16, 1979. 3. That if approval is granted, the conditions of the original approval shall apply to this extension of time. 4. That in the event a detailed site development plan and SEPA Determination has not been submitted for review by the Hearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing by October 1, 1991, then and in that event a hearing shall be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to consider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural. 5. That prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee for review of said site development plan(s) and SEPA Determination, the applicant shall provide a legal description prepared by a licensed surveyor. 6. That the following are conditions that may be added to the proposal by the Hearing Examiner Committee at the above-stated public hearing and now serve as information to the applicant. ZONE CNANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Revi sed Condi ti ons Nos. 14, 159 16 and 17 : 14. Right of Way and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. It is agreed that an additional fifth lane (two-way left-turn lane) shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Spokane County wil l proceed wi th the construction of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broadway including acquisition of additional right of way required for the fifth lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinafter specified. 2. The Developer shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of the additional right of way required and likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of constructing the additional width required to provide the fifth lane operation. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to State of Washington's South right of way line of SR 90. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lane on the approach to Broadway shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. Transition in width may be required south of Broadway Avenue. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway from SR 90 to Broadway Avenue including any transition in width required south of Broadway Avenue and also including acquisition of additional right of way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof subject to reimbursement by the Developer as nereinafter specified. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. J9 ~ ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the P roject. 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and a left-turn lane on the approach to Sullivan Road and with a dual left-turn lane at the principal entrance to the project shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are completed on the project site. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway from Sullivan Road to the east property line of the project including the transition of width east of the east property line and also including acquisition of additional right of way required for widening the roadway. Spobcane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the Developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right of way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. 6. Roadway improvements to Broadway shall include curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channelization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the Mall. 7. The Developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acquiring ten feet of right of way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue south for one hundred fi fty feet (150' ) to a poi nt of zero wi dth and for the necessary reconstruction of Conklin at the Broadway Avenue intersection. 8. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The 8roadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through tne Valley Mall development with required tapers. An additional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. ~ ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 15. Traffic Signals - The Developer's share of the cost of improvement or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percent of traffic generated by the Valley Mall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadway and the major Valley Mall entrance (the total cost by the developer) 16. Future Partici~ ation. Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessi tate t~ie wiZieni ng of Broadway Avenue from the Val l ey Mal l development east to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at this time. However, the Oeveloper should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections fromn future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. There shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access road as shown on the development plan submitted with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. c ) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMEfdT l. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of interim on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Heal th Di stri ct. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition metnod pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. P ROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. ZONE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made when it is available. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Vde request a change of conditions (of approdal) if this project is granted its request. Specifically, that the project be connected to a public sewer, and that on-site sewage disposal system(s) not be allowed. We cite section 1.04.090-(3) of Spokane County Rules and regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems: "If the distance between the premises to be served and an adequate public sewer is greater than 200', and if the anticipated sewage flow is greater than 1,000 gallons per day, connection shall be made thereto if the Health Officer determines that a connection is feasible and such connection is permitted by the sewer utility owner/operator or sewer distric t." e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. Due to the sensitive storage requirements over the Aquifer, and this site lies witinin the Waste Water Management area, we feel that some language should address the possible storage of flamrnable or critical materials within these structures. 4. Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 5. Building permits will be required for each structure. ~ . • ZONE CNANGE OF CONDITIONS N0. ZE-142A-77 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT (continued) b. Fire hy drants which meet the fire flow are required to be installed prior to any construction. These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than 175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04 of the Uniform Fire Code is required prior to construction of the water service. All required fire protection facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. f) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY (NO COMMENTS NAVE BEEN RECEIVED.) AGENDA, OCTOBER 3, 1985 - 2- TELEPNONE N0.• 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 (Continued from Page #1) ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. ZW-60-85 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING (Generally located east of and adjacent Craig Road, app roximately 1/4 mile south of Thorpe Road in Section 2-24-41.) Comprehensive Plan Industrial Proposed Use: General Industrial and Pre-Cast Manufacture and Storage of Concrete Products Site Size• Approximately 40 Acres Applicant: WILLIAM J. HOUK West 5905 Val,e Lane Spokane, WA 99208 ' 3. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE (Generally located east of and adjacent Sullivan Road, and north of and adjacent Broadway Avenue in Section 13-25-44.) Comprehensive Plan• Major Commercial and Suburban Change of Conditions Modify Condition of original Request: approval which required substantial development of the subject property by October l, 1985. Site Size: Approximately 70 Acres Applicants: VALLEY MALL ASSOCIATES c/o Dwight Hume 500 Columbia Building Spokane, WA 99204 n o t e: An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this project and is available for public inspection at the Spokane County Planning Department S:OQ P.M. - - - ADJOURNMENT The followin4 information applies to all app1ications for the October 3, 1985, Agenda of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee with the excepti,on of File No. ZWT64-85: Except when an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared, as may be indicated above for a specific case, a Determination of Non-Significance (ONS) has been issued FOR EACH PROPOSAL ABOVE; except that most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA. A DNS is a decision, based upon information available at the time the ONS was issued, that no EIS has been ordered to be prepared. Comments regarding a ONS: (1) are due by the close of business haurs, October 2, 19852 (2) should reference the specific file number; and (3) should be addressed to the Spokane County Planning Department, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. Addition- ally, comments on the DNS and any other environmental documents may be made at the public hearing, the time and place of which is set forth above. Contact the Planning Department Staff for more information (509/456-2205). (continued) e . AGENDA, OCTOBER 3, 1985 - 3- TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 (Continued from Page #2) ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS The following information applies to the application File No. ZbJ-64-85: A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) has been issued for ZW-64-85. A MDNS is a decision, based on information available at the time the MDNS was issued, that no Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been ordered to be prepared. The MDNS signifies that the Responsible Official (the Planning Department), pursuant to State law felt the project as proposed by the sponsor would likely have a probable significant adverse impact on the physical environment, but due to an agreement to revise the project by the applicant, consistent with mitigating changes proposed by the Responsible Official, no probable significant adverse impacts are judged to resuit from the revised proposal. Commenbs regarding a MDNS: (1) are due by the close of business hours, October 2, 1985; (2) should reference the specific file number; and (3) should be addressed to the Spokane County Planning Department, North 721 Jefferson, SFokane, WA 99260. Additionally, corrments on the MDNS and other environmental documents may be made at the public hearing, the time and place of which is set forth above. Contact the Planning Department for more information (509/456-2205). ; ~ _ ~ \ bNIpGE . ~ M• aSO7 ~ I2 ~ , - ~r . . , Z r < , . . > ~ ~ • " .~.,n~~ , • • . ~ , GA RDER ' - _ • ~ . ~ . ` ~c ~°,1r 90 t < -c . 0 ~ J • . . . 1L cr ~ . Q ♦ ~ 9 iSRO►►Dv:'hY hY£. 13 Firc t 11 ores'r ~Station ' W 5~ tic r~ ZEml42Am771:- 4-f ° > ac ~ A L L ~ • . N - 2 or ~ a rj r v..~. - - - t ►~.a~w nv& Ri ? Y p ~ ~ O/9Z.~ ~ .•1000 - - SPRAGUE . . . ~ . , . ~ • . vE A LE r `CM.3T. P~P RR GO. ~ - • - - . - ~ / N _ ~ A 'I ~ ~ ~~OIL IIOAFD OF COUZJTY COPU•1ISSI0NERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDIiJGS AND ORDER REGARDING : ZE-142-77, AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL, hnown as Valley :Sall l'JHEREAS, The Spokane County Flanning Commission did, after public hearing on~ SeptembeF 22 and 28, 1978, fonvard to the Board of County Comtiissiopers,"a recommendation that the Zoning Map (be) changed fror6 ~tiejexisting Agricultural classification to the Commercial classification on property descrived as follows: ~ Section, 13, Township 25N, Range 44, L. W. ti. PARCEL A: That part of the STi 1/4 of Section 13 described as Zollows: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the tJ 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which is the true POB; thence N along the E side of County road 649.32'; 1/4 of said Section 13; thence S89°37' E 504.31; thence S 649.321; thence S 89°51' ja along the V line of County road 530.3' more or less to the POB. PARCEL B: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of Section 13-25-44; thence S 69°51' E along the iI line of County road 540.3' to the true POEi; thence N 1,305.25' to a point; thence S 89°57' E 519.36' to a point; thence 0°3 1/4' t-l 1, 306. 12' to a point on the 11 line of County road; thence tJ 89°51' W along said I1 line of County road 518.48' to the POI3. PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/2 of the NtfJ 1/4 of S-2c:tion 13-25-44 described as follows: Beginning 20 feet 11 and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said section; thence S 89°51' E along the Pl line of Broadway Road No. 443 for 1,058.33' to the true POE; thence t•1 0°03 1/2' E 1,306.12'to the PJ line of the S 1/2 of the c1 1/2 of said section; thence S 89°57' E along the Id line 519.36'; thence S 0°07' 1•7 1,306.99' to the N line of said road; thence 11 89°51' td along the N line 518.63' to the true POI3, excepting that part of the r/w of PSIi PJo. 2. ALS0, that portion of the S 1/2 of the 11 1/2 of Section 13-25-44 lying Sly of the Sly line of PSFi i1o. 2, described as follows : FARCEL D: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the « 1/2 corner of said Section 13, and running thence S 89°51' E, along the 14 line of IIroadway Avenue 2,612.62' to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence rl 0°14' E 1,343.73'; thence S 89°51' E 519.36'; thence S 0°17 1/2' 1-1 1,309.60' to a point on the N line of saicl Broadway Avenue; thence tJ 89°51' 1-1 along said I3roadway 1lvenue 513.08' to the POB, except the r/w conveyed to Spokane Valley Irrigation Co.; and except the E 200' thereof conveyed to HighNaay Chapel, Inc. P11RCEL E: IIeginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and running thence S 89°51' E, along the 11 line of Broadway Avenue, 1,576.4G feet I . ~ ~ : ~~~w~~?"~~.'J!►~'1'x . ~ • _ ti I•y~.h~l+:"~~rs*'!•t n7~-~~~ ~ : '~•^'`~'i',~ `1'~ ~ti~~••', - - . I ~ ~~r►' y'"i,""~ irI'-_ ~l'~~ i++~f~ + r ~h, , • ~+t'... Mt .'~.)i1~~t'~'~~Jr..f►~G~~..1C~~~~~Z~~?iPwr~~~C~• . ' •f rN -Wk. LA X7. ~w.~.~ji'. ~~/1~~'ti ~J ~ii~r~ I~+/r~~ a»j•~tii~ fi` ~ - - - - -~"~v---- - - - - - - ...tr~--_ w- - . . i 6WL,4 ~ aCT' m p Ut- ~ ~ : v I l~``~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ l1~. LA-, t3 ~ tj 'L 7cr`J cr~ 0( ~ t p u l2 . ~Dt-~ 5 CD 1/& T,..! C Cj'•.) 2 , rl G~ ' ,Z 1'~~~. • ~ _ ~ -,U v4j ~1, 0~ ~ r./ t ' _ _ ~ -I ~ • 11'~ I- ~ 1vr` CC r ~ L... C _l tv ,ry,~ - ~ M~ ~"o 60 ~ - P . • . ~ . to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence iJ1007' E 1..306.99' to the i1 line of the S 1/2 of the 11 1/2 of said Section 13; thence S 39°57' E 1,03VO.72'; thence S 0014' ld, 1,308.731 to the N line of said Broadway Avenue; hence,11-89°51' W, along said Broadway Avenue 1, 6.16' to the F03, excent r/w conveyecl to Spokane Valley Irrigation Company. ~ ~ and, LA i~IiEI2.EAS, Dorothy egek; North 704 Conl:lin, did by letter dated October 4, 19731 r uest a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners t present eviclence and testimony, and r WHEREAS, the Board of County Coruizissioners did hold a public hearing on lZovember 20, 1978, to consider the recommenda- ti ons of the Plan.ning Com~ission and testimony and evidence of the applicant and other interested parties, and WHERL:AS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described Zoning Map proposal, and the Board of County Comriissloners of Spokane County having fully considerecl the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presentecl and having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find: ~ -2- . t+ '`~A_/~ V~'~wv . r C . • ♦ ~S i~ G~r-~v+~'~'/1 "~V~'r ~ir~ir~e ~►'""`c+~Y~~~'r~,. ♦~~:~~,e s.,""~ ^'~r~ ~►~~y~~► y t •¢Q'' ~h~»~ jb4~t'a.~e~ ~ ' h ' ~`'~'~a' , s '~a~` ~1''`~y' • ' .~,~,~1~.,,,~~ rr~r~lpd~A ~~3 . ^ ` ~ y •I~~ _ .?~il+~ s~+ ► ~'1 v v w. ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . r ihat the appeal request be denied and that the deci- sion of the Planning Commission be upheld in part. In their the Board concluded that a regional shoPping mall would be an appropriate use for this site. Z'IiEREFORE, Findings,an~d Order for this action are a s follows: FINDIIJGS - PUIiLIC SAFETY 11ND WL'LFARE ~ The Board of County Commissioners has determined that the use of the subject property for a commercial regional shopping raall is an appropriate use for said property and th3t said uses of the property will not be unduly detrimental to the surrounding properties. Said determination of t11e Board is based upon the documentation and testimony presented at the Spokane County Planning Conunission hearing and the documentation and testimony presented at the appeal hea?-1ng before the Board of County Commissioners. The Board hereby finds as follows: 1. That those issues raised relative to the elements of tne environment at the ANppeal Iiearing can be effectively mitigated through the attachment and enforcement of conditions. 2. That the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose of guidang and regulating the physical development of the County and will benefit the public health, safety and welfare. 3. In upholdinq the Planning Commission's decision of ' approval, the Board considered those mitigating factors identified in the final Environmental Irapact Statement (EIS) . The following mitigating measures are being attached and made a condition of approval: 1. Uuring the construction phase of the project, work hours shall be confined to the period from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. which conforms to provisions of Chapter 173-60 WAC for noise control. 2. Construction vehicles sliall use Sullivan Road as their primary access to the property and avoid , _ . - - - - - ~ ~ I , w~.~ ~ ~Yr•~ ti~ , ~ `+.i,~ ~ w~ ~ ~ ~y +}J ~~v~~ S ~~.~'~.~C ~i►•`,~, ~y~ n~/`A'~~ ~N~~/~►~~q"~'~ e • '~-d ~!„'~'~7~►`~y,`~. °,~t.~~►..j~'~y'.~~ ~t:~L~!'a. l ..~t•~ ~,V y '~yw~r~!4►r ~4+~. `T~.~'•~i:~~ :rdw~~ 7`~IF ~1 ~.i~ .J"L L..ii+4Li L/~'~s ~ ~ :r'7G}~.-+'+s~. r v: S'.r . . ♦ w s ~ w«r • ~ +~1 ~ ~ . f~= .--NJ,-N '-r _...._N_..._Jos-~-~.Lw.L-__~._1=J..-,•-+, ! .~_i~... _ J ~ _ _ . the use of Broadway Avenue west of Sullivan Road in order to prevent adverse effects on Progress School; nrovidecl, however, that this restriction shall not apply during the surruner months when the Progress is not in session. 3. Mechanical systems such as heating, sewage facilities and air conditioning units shall be desiRned to abate noise by util~2ing soupd and sight Uaffles. 4. Other than as.may~bj'permitted for illuminated signs, "down lighting" shall e installed so that no light- ing cvithin the mall p perty extends beyond the site. Footpath illuminations shall be installed along pedestrian ways. 5. A reasonable area for cornnuter parking shal.l be incorporated into the mall including an area desig- nated for bus loading and unloading. The sa.ze and location thereof shall be determined by the Spokane County Planning Director, subject to final approval by the Board of County Comma.ssioners. 6. Facilities for bicycle usaRe shall be developed including areas where bicycles can be secured. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall subnit to the Planning Department plans for pedestrian and bicycle lanes. 8. The following energy-conservation measures shall be incorporated in the actual construction of the mall to improve the energy efficiency thereof: (a) Building orientation and design details for r.laximum solar efficiency; (b) Use of lanc3scaped earth berming along exterior walls and reduction of window area; (c) Use of tinted glass, double glass or thermal glass in windows; (d) Use of roof overhang or rolladen-type sunscreens in glassed areas; (e) Insulation in roof, ceilings and walls; (f) Use of high performance heating and cooling units; (g) Primary use of fluorescent rather than incandes- cent lights, except for design accent purposes. -2- - ~ : a _ i oy r ~ ~ ~l► ' ~~,~~~~~v_~'Or►~`~ ` w•~y ~'31fi~I' 'cl-O~C • ;,~r ~y ~ ~"'r'a~s r~ t . 's J . ~y~'~.~'i 4 I +~'i V•~~1' ~,`~Ar-~ `~~.~'js.~~ ~ ~ (~~~~~r","M't° , !'Yn,~~o.-p'' ~ p`~''" ~.~'Ai+:~-~~:'~°'~'~+~''t` `~700"_ ~ . a _ - `~a.~".;~.~a .J ~`~`~r1►"`~'~'"~~"~. ~1~~0►-73-1@t/c s.'L~,.?brt-Str.x.~r~ . ' ~ _ _ - - - A r'--' FINDITIGS - LOCATIOiJAL CRITERIA The Board of County Commissioners considered the site l,ocation as; an integral part in reactung their decision. The e-.-~ . - - - Board hereby finds the following: 1. ^:he site is 40cated adjacent to an interstate freeway to the north and adr~ac nt to two highly traveled arterials on the sodt~h~and west thereby limiting the prospective resiclenti use of the property. 2. The proPerty owner to the east of the subject pro- perty has approved of tlle proposed use of said pro- perty for commercial use. 3. Zone Classifications: a. I7orth - Agricultural, 6/1II/57 b. west - Commercial, 3/9/78, 1969 and 1971 c. South - Agricultural, Two-Fanuly Residential Family Residential, 3/27/42, 6/11/70 and 3/5/76 d. East - Agricultural, 3/27/42 Land Use : a. Site - Vacant. b. ?lorth - Red Lion Alotor Inn and Freeway. c. tgest - Commercial business. d. South - Fire station and single family residence. e. East - Vacant land and a church. 4. The noise levels emanating from the freeway and adjacent arterials restrict the use of the subject property for residential use. 5. The site has a high degree of visual exposure. 6. The site was selected by the applicant based on market analysis as reported in the Environmental Impact Statement (EZS). 7. The site size of 70 acres is between the recommended ' size of 35 acres to 80 acres for a regional shopping mall. 8. High accessibility by auto or transit to the center is a prime essential for site selection for a regional shopping center and the subject site is so situated. 9. The site is near a populated area and in an area that is growing rapidly. The Spokane County poPulation forecast by SMATS is 334,000 for 1985, 352,000 for 1990 and 356,000 for the year 2000. In addition, a report entitled "Design Population Update for -3- ~ l Lry./ ~ +t ~~~~d~'~j ► ~i ~~'~'"~T ~D,•r•~••►✓~~, • I ~►n`~ ~ "1r i~~ ~~~,,~~'~~~"~~►Mr~~ y `~'6' i- ,~`..~'?'f,° . ~'~'v.'t~,'~d~".~',./'~` :_.~Ti"'V'^0.~~ . ~k~•_ ~~`~s. . v'" j~~~ Ar ~,0► + ~ ,I~. 1~t~~^' ' ~1~`~-`• ~w ~~~~T. • a ~ i.~ ~ ~.~L.. f.. ~ r►ti~ ..~t.i~ ~ 2 i~'~~ie.~t.i,r Q> 1 i~ Li~ Spokane County Comprehensive Plan - November 1978" has a design population for the Spokane Metropolitan area of an additional 70,000 people by the year 2000. ---~-~_-A-~~_-,A0.-,-The Spokane Valley area east of the City of Spokane is a rapidly-growing area which is not served by a regional shopping center. The said Spokane Valley area is in n ed of a regional shopping center to serve tlie resident~ t}zereof 1and to avoid the requirement for saia resident' travoklng substantial distances to existing shopping areas with commensurate expenditures of energy. 11. The site for a reqional center shoulcl be located near freeway off-ranps and the subject site is to situated. 12. The site is a continuous parcel and is not separated by any roads, streets, or other physical barriers. 13. In approving this zone change, the Board has con- sidered other possible locations far a regional shopping center in the Spot:ane Valley. 14. The Board finds the following favorable site conditions: (a) Accessibility (b) Continuous parcel (cne-piece) (c) Sufficient site area for expansion and buffering (d) :1o grading problems (e) Close to expanding resideritial areas (f) The development of the site will not result in the c3isruption of environmentally sensitive f lora or fauna. FINDIIvGS - ECONOMIC CRITERIA In their deliberation the Board evaluated the economic viability of a regional center for this location. ihe followinR criteria were found to exist. 1. The area surrounding the proposed development - presents favorable market and economic conditions. 2. Uepartment stores with consumer acceptance will be the key to insure the center's economic vitality. The applicant has designed the mall to include four development stores. 3. The Board finds that a regional shopping centzr will not unduly affect the City of Spokane's Central IIusiness District. -4- r . ~ C . ;`~y+ ~ '"a a : ' ! .~~~.~`U°~'~"'Z"'s1`~O~-'~,~ ~""'~1~'~~~-~'`3.*•~'- r~`; •w,.,~'~~'~,~~ ~~1^.~+y~°) ~'.,p'~~7'~''. ~ ~~•~~~~~1N~y"}f .v~'Y_.~.aq~~~ Iu ~ r s I~ ~ "'CSCi ...o~. . M ~ '!r ~ ♦ p.~~" 'S~Jr~'p~~ ~ .sr. ~~~st~Si..'1~4~'A~~~ ~Rl,.4 ~~~i..Ir1 .C y.~/J'~''w: W~+,.y,..~ i~.o :►'~4~.'~L~il~ ~ 4. The IIoard further finds that this proposal is considered an expansion to the suburbs and not a decentralization of the central city. The Board f inds that the real and viable resources of PIP ~ downtown Spokane are: (a) The masses of people such as shoppers, office workers, and tourists. (b) Offices, banks, e~tc. (c ) Public s6rviqe~.i 1__ . (d) Government. (e) Cultural resoure 7 s. 5. lhe Qoard finds that there may be a slight impact on existing shopping centers. However, these centers will need to be strengthenec3 by providing new businesses, parkinq facilities, and other public con- venience amenities. 6. Tihe Board finds that the location of the Valley Piall will assist in making mass transit r:lore viable not only for shoppers, but for commuter traffic to downtown Sp ikane . Both the Valley t'iall and downtown Spokane will compliment mass transit purposes. 7. The developrr.ent of a regional shopping mall on the sub]ect property will increase competition between all shopping centers, including the City of Spokane Central BLSiness District, to the benefit of consumers. FINDINGS - DESIG'.V CRITERIla The Board finds that the design o€ this development will provide a pleasant shopping environment. The following design considerations are noted: l. The proposal contains a continuous interior peripheral roadway within the site to minimize the traffic impact upon the surrounding areas. 2. Efficient parking configuration. 3. Clustering of stores in a mall-like setting. 4. The erection of a landscaped earthen berm to buffer the area to the south. 5. Providing shoppers' comfort and climate control. 6. Otner design considerations noted are: (a) Freedom from congestion (b) Ample off-street parking (c) Convenient access -5- _ _ , . . . ~ , R • ~j~ ~-'~j •f ~1~•~` ~t~ ~:~'•q ~'!'V~~' ~p' ~ 7^` ~y 1'~,~ :;e '~'~•`~p`q. ° °`.`4' ~I~` A~'' r •~~~.~"..i' ~ ~~~~~~L'1► I~A.~~~ `~i~+ '~11^+.~ ~'~1\^;~•I~ser?~-r' (d) Efficient mass transit (e) Attractive modern buildings (f) Easy circulation (g) Cultural amenities ~ ~~(h) -Convenient access between businesses within the mall. 7. This proposaoffers a clustering of stores which will enhance custo ers' con'venience, unlike many of the existing shop~ing,cqnt~rs which are simply "strip centers", i.e., a connection of stores with front door parking and cJhere pedestrian access is, for the most part, from the oqtside. ~ 8. The parking has been designed to eliminate hazardous conflicts with pedestrians walking from parking spaces to stores and vice versa. ORDER - CONDITIO24S FOR APPROVAL - VALLEY NU1LL l. The decision of the Spokane County Planning Commission is hereby aff irmed and the appeal therefrom is hereby denzed, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order. 2. lhe developer shall comply with all of the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Iiealth Uistrict and other pertinent local and state regulatory agencies of jurisdiction as they exist at the time of construc- tion. All necessary jlealth District permits shall be obtained :)rior to issuance of buildinq permits. Sew- age collection and dasnosal facilities shall be de- signed so as to facilitate interception to a general sewer system and must be approved by the County Utilities Department. 3. Any sewage treatment facilities shall be located at least five hundred feet (500') from existing resi- dences along IIroadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. Fencing, screening, and landscaping of such facilities may be required by tlle Planning Department after submission of development plans. The sewage treatment facilities must be maintained and operated by an operator certified by the State of 14a shi ngton . 4. Fire mains and hydrants shall be a.nstalled in accorclance with Spokane County Fire Piarshal's requirements. Approval of all other fire plans by the Fire Marshal shall be obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. The sponsor shall develap the oropertv generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning 1ldministrator after coordination with other requlatory agencies, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: building location; building -6- ~ , .j~t~' .~,,~~'=qy- ' i ~ A..s~_ ~y • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~'L'`'~~ ~'rA~/✓ ~ ~ ~y ~y~•r',Ci.~r~~~,,,ya•~_~7Y ' A 'V~.y.~1~~r~~~j~•~°~7~5 _~i•f~`'1~6~'~~~,p,°~~ ~"6~~~~K" b°~r'~' ~y • ••~r h • r r r ..4. v ~ ~ ~ s ~p~,~. ~ ~,y~~~ ~f/M ~ i ~r~+~~ ~ir 'L~r~r 3r ~-i34Li L~M~~~~ .lw~ ~ e~r~. ~ ~'r ~w+~ ~ w a~ ° • ~ J. • ww'~` materials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth lI1 the Spolcane County Zoning Ordinance. _ -~The original intent of developing a regional shopping mall shall be maintained. 6. In the event substantial,development (the construction of the mall) of the.s bject property in accordance with the deveaopment pAn has not commenced by October 1, 1985, th~n nd in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearin Examiner Committee ta con- sider either a time e itension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural. 7. If regulations emanating from the Spokane "200" Water Quality 14anagement Program are in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall cor.lply with all such rules, regulations or guidelines for the protection of the aquifer. Valley Mall development plans shall incor-porate "208" Program recommendation concepts, as adopted by the Board of County Conuntissioners, subject to review approval by the Plannang llirector. Any operations within the site which proposes to store, use, handle or aispose of "critical substances" as defined by the "200" Program shall be subject to review and approval by the County Planning Oirector. a. A surface water runoff managernent plan shall be pre- pared by the Developer, meeting the approval of the CotLnty Engineer. The plan shall maximize disposal of runoff waters through grassed percolation area and minimize collection to dry well disposal. ihe land- scaping plan hereinafter required shall incorporate such drainage disposal concepts. 9. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 10. 'I'he landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by a perFormance bond or other acceptable security in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Adr~.inistrator prior to the issuance of building oermits. The bond shall guarantee the _ naintenance of the landscaping for a period of two years after completion of the landscaping. Instal- lations of an automatic sprinkler system shall be required. 11. Berming and landscaping shall be erected cor;mensurate with the phased construction on the subject property. As construction commences on the project, an eight (8) foot undulating berm along IIroadway shall progress therewith so tllat berming will be in place a distance east on Broadway one hundred feet (100') beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. -7- , 4 -v,~~~~ ` ` ti"8}'"""~h- ~,M'~'•ti0.~''v~M~'~ ~ iL7f - - ~y~,~~a.oy~ 6 r,g,~,r~y ~1~~T~y~'i►.~•~ r~~. ^ ',',~`~r .v ri'Y ~ + ~-~~''r'~ ' ` ' _ ~~~i~w~ 4' a~ ~,,~,•q~~t~~~a~~ 1~ ` 1~~G~~ b~f`r~., ~ M ~~..q,,,,,`_` e w ~ t 1 ~ ► ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' L ~ 1' ~LM~ . ..~.~..~~A :~~"T'~~~~.~ ~e. ~~w~~ ~...Lt.~► .A~ s ~~~P~'. ~C~~ L1CL~~+~~1~rR ~Z"~'~~/My. " - - - - ^ - _ - _ - . . . r 12. Where needEd, barriers shall be erectecl along pro- perty lines to contain blowing debris caused by prevailing winds. ihe location and type af materials used therefor shall be approved Uy the Zoning prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The owners a d tenants of the property shall form an association ~o insure\m intenance and up-keep of the following : ! ~ > ~ (a) Al1 on-site faci ities, including, but not limit- ed to. landscap~ng; sewaqe da.sposal; lighting; snow removal; debris removal; parking area maintenance inclucling striping and lane markers; and other required facility andjor mechanical equipnent. 19. Right-of-bJay and Roadway Improvements. A. Sul livan Road f rom Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. Spokane County had pre-existing plans for building a four-lane roadway within existing right-of-way. The County presently owns j the right-of-way for said project. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construc- tion of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broadway including acquisition of additional right-of-way required for the fii'th lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the ~ developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The developer shall reinburse Spokane County for the cost of right-of-way required for said fifth lane ard likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of construction of 'Os~ the fif th lane. 4. For each square foot of building completed on the project site, the developer shall reimburse the County one eight hundrEd thousandth of the above stated reimburseable costs. A11 ,WeO reimbursable costs shall be paid by the developer in full upan completion of 500,000 square feet of buildings upon the pro]ect site. 5. In the event the developer does not proceed with the development of the pro]ect site, the dSOV4 developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to Spokane County. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway 1lvenue to State of tidash? ngton' s South Right-of-Tlay Line for Highway I-90. _3_ .A. -~.!~vs~'~ 1.~f .t1 SC ~i`~__~" a~.s:~'~,n„~(~~~,•~ • ~~~-.~o~~i/`,~d~vl. - . ' y~ ~'d"~~~ • '~~,,1►~+'~'4'','a.~- • ti,~~., ,,~"Y Y~" _ +~vS~Q/'" 1 j .~y ~~_NJ~;~ ~ +~Gd~+~ ,C;'4~.r+~°~~.fM ~•°/~f~~~ ~ ~~i~4 '~d~~~A'~~~ ti~ .+iti7S : -.~.+.C+► . - ~ w~~ ~ .~Lv ► w .r ~~i ~~w.~...~I ~ .i ~r.. ~ l r► . dar~~i ~ 7► ✓ ~u/~• ii~ ~••s-• . . - _ -c"r`~.a✓, .-a- _ _ ~ -.-.~,~..-a--a a " .-i _ - - ' ~ . . ~ fP • r • l. It is agreed that two aclditional 12-foot wide traffic lanes ancl an additional left turn lane on the approacli to Broadway sha11 be required prior to the time that ~ - SOJ, 000 square feet of buildings are com- pleted on the pro3ect site. Transition in wa.dth rtay be required south of Broadway Aven u e . v, ~ 2. Theldevqlc'pe~ ( shall reimburse the County for 5arn~ the acquisit on costs of the riqht-of-way required fo said additional lanes. 3. The developer shall reimburse the County ye for the cost of construction of the additional traffic lanes. 4. The developPr shall reimburse the County for 50,o,e, the above-described costs when said road improveMents are completed, C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. 1. Additional right-of-way shall be acquired by Saokane County to provide width adequate ,t~`~,~% for two through lanes in each c3irection plus left turn lanes with a dual left turn lane at the principal entrance to the project. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for A the cost of acquiring ten feet of right-of- s~~"`E ~i way on each side of Conklin Road tapering f rom Broadway Avenue South for one hundred fifty feet (1501) to a point of zero width. 3. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conl%lin Road 4 to prohibit direct access of the Valley SA~~~ a Mall traf fic into the residen tial areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley P1a11 Developmen t with required tapers. An addi- tional friction lane may be required by the County f-rom two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. 4. Roadway irnprovements to Broadway shall in- clude curbs and sidecaalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channel- ization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the iAall. 5. The developer shall reinburse the County mi for the County's cost of right-of-way h~ ai acquisition, if any, and improvement ~43 construction cost. 6. The foregaing improvements shall be completed as traf f ic conditions require. -9- ✓ ~ 4_''~,~,~s~_ ~ f ~.y~/ .1'6.~► V i~• ~ ~r. t+dI~~r~y 'Y~Y~ ' `h[~ `~tij~~ ` V '_'~3~ ~'~`!'~?"'~z o~4 ~b ~ i~ ► •~q~ij 41Ny1. ~i~~~ ItiMrAr+ • • ♦ ~ t ~~L ` - ~~~Y~* 4~~~~ ~ ~a ~ ♦ • • ~A ♦ ~ ~y ♦ r~~~J ~v r ~ ~ ~~71s. ,,,fY' _ ~ f ~"1 _.q ~•~=',~~1►~ `r~..~ ~ i ...`~X,~►s~r''..x!"~~."`~"~ _~..+~irou~~ti , c. . _ ' - , . . II ~ . ~ • • ~ . • t ~ 15. Traffic Signals - The developer's share of the cost of improverient or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed uPon the percent of traf f ic generated by the Val ley ?tall or as otherwise noted: ~ Sullivan and Sprague 4P Sulliva and Mission Broadwa~ and Flor\a SullivanlandB oaj~way ~ BroadtiJay and t~e major Valley Piall entrance (the total cost y the developer) lb. Future Participation Traffic generated by the Valley tiIall may necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley Mall developrnent east to Flora Road and Flora Road fron Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley P1a11 ~ cannot be determined at this time. lIowever, the developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections from future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. lhere shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue e::cept at the intersection of the circular 4#0 tiaccess roaa as shoiqn on the development plan sub- mittecl with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. 18. The development shall be served by Vera tlater and Power District. There shall be no private wells located on the site without the written authority of the purveyor. s 19. No builcling permits shall be issued until all water quality and caastewater discharge permits are obtained. 20. In the event the developer does not proceed with the clevelopment of the project site, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to Spokane County for any of the right-of-way and roadway inprovements, set forth in paragraph 14 (Right-of-Way and Roadway Improvements ) . DAlED this day of , 1979 BOARD OI' COUInrY C0tIMISS IQIIERS OF SPOKAIJE CQUNTY ,tIASHIP4G 1 ON ~ AiTEST: ~ VERi30N. CV.;?(XILAiJD C er~ ` o,fr' the Boar ~ ~ - .o By ~ ~ Deputy Clerk -10- . . _ _ . ~ ~ ^ .~r _ ( _ _ ~.w`~~ -~'7V~~~17~~•~+~ ^ ~~i' ~.w.~ ~,~r ~A,ep ~`~°~~'r j~ ~ • ' t.'rY.Z»~~ ~'l~`~4'"~,~~Y►+r~pA2S+v ~l ' Yrr"~F-i. f.f t~ w tRi ~ . on ~ ~S.,.` ~L. V 1r • * ~a ~ f ~ ~ ~ir'„ ~~T' ~~~~~7;`~~►' '^"7~~~ ~ ^ .w.~ M.I~'h~As"~'~~~ ~ ~"'~4~'~~. i` ~ ~ ~~aV .i/~'k'"W~.w..` 'F/T _+-aw_ - • o-~~~~. i ~ ~ S~ • Y IL . ~ ~ , OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER . SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date .19 Inter-office Communication ~ To. ~,;Guncy Lonisib Acfmir,istrator ~ From kane (;ounty Engineer C' SU6%CCt 7Xr•?:*t!z i.ort t?C'riut?ct 7F i4 7--77 "Va 1 j~_•v Mn1 4~ c:`: 1.'k+ C>L CIIL pI'vp()Sai tii e:ttei►U tClr: approveZ C1Mcl ydG:c: IliiS f7t_eti l:Ul:lJ)± k:Ck:ci . C00cl f tians o€ approval contained in board of County Cotmmisaioner' a Re$Qlution tic. dated lb July 1919 have also been reviewed in ti.me extensian request. ~ ~ attached revised Conditions No. 14, 15, 16 and 17 are being submitted for ~ -aian in the Findinga and Order for the time extension. These conditions shuuld . . . ~ . ~ -ur,n Yi' -L 2. J - - ; Ccmd•v~ t~~ ~ d a.Lt~ y~l a* 14. Rigiit-of-Way and Roadway Improvements. QP.f e 2"r ~ ' A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. ' 1. It is agreed [hat an additional fifth lane ([wo-way left-turn lane) shall be required prior [o the [ime tha[ 5009000 square feeL of buildings are completed on the project site. Spokane Coun[y will proceed with the constructian of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broad way including acquisi[ion of additional right-oE-way required f,): the fif[h lane. Spokane Coun[y shall fund the en[ire cost thereof, subject to reimburse:::or:t by the developer :;s hert:naiter spccifier3. 2. The Deveioper shal ~ rci~:hu~ S~~~(,r;~~ne C,;u:I[y f0r tl►e cost ot the addi[tonal right-of-way reyuired and likewise shall reimburse SE>una~;_: County for the cost oE construccing the addi[ional wid[h reGuired to provide the fifth lane operation. 3. The DeveloFer 5t1a11 reimburse the County for the above-described cosCs wtien said road iraprovements are comple[ed. B. Sullivan Roacl from Bruadway Avenue to State of Wastiin,~;ton's tiouch r[giit-of- way 1 ine ot SK 90, 1. It is adr«d [hat two a.iditional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an addi- tional left turn lane on the approach to Broadway shall be required prior to the time tha[ 500,000 square feet of buildings are comple[ec? on the project site. Transitlon in width may he required South of Brvauway Avenue. 2. Spokane County will procecci vith the constructian af [he widened roadway from SR 90 to Broadway Avenue including any transition in width required Souih of Broad way Avenue and also including acquisiCion of additional righ[-oE-way required for wiciening the roadvay. Spokane County sh$11 fund the entire cost thereof subject [o reimbursemEnt by Ctlp Developer as hereinafter sptcified. 3. Tfle Developer shali reimhurse the Cotinty for the a~~ui.s'_ti~~cl costs nt Ctic riv;r LqU:r(2.; t'.)r SJid a,i,j:[io:i,_►~ 1.1ne5. s}la:l :c~i;-bur5e Z'cir, Cc~un[y fUr thr! cc;~;t rr: coli~;truct[r~r~ of the acidi[ional traffic lanes. 5. The Developer shall reimburse the Coun[y for [tie abuve-descr.ibed costs when said road improvements are conpleted. C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Proper[y Line oE the Project. 1. It is agreeci7[lia[ two addittonal 12-foot vide traffic lanes and a left- ~ Curn lane on the approach to 5ullivan Roacl and with a dual left-turn ",hs~ ~ lane a[ the principal entrance to the project shall be required prior [o the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are coopleted on the project site. 2. Spokane Coun[y will proceed with the construction of the widened roadway fcocc Sullivan Road to the Eas[ property line of the pro,ject includir}t; the [ransition of vicith East of tlie East propecty line and also in- cluding acquisltion of additional right-of-way required for widening the roadway. Spokane County shaIl Funci the entire cost thereoF, subject to reimbursernent by the Developer as hereinafter specifted. The Deve2oper shall reirnburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right-of-way required for said additional lanes. 4. The Devcloper shall reimburse the County for the cost of coristruction of the additional traffic lanes. 9~• The Developer shall reimburse the Couc1[y for tiie above-cicscribed costs when said road improvements are completed. :,.6. RoAd way improvements to Broad way shall include curbs and sidewalks on both the North and South sides of the street, and channelization at ttie Sullivan Road intersection and tht-, majoc entrance [o the Ma11. c--7. The Developer shall reimbt,r se the County for the cost of acqutring ten feet of rigttt-of-way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue South for one hundred f if ty fee[ (1 50' ) to a poin[ of zero width and for the necessary recons[ruc[ion of Conklin at the Broadway AVenue intersection. . + . 7. The D lap er shell relmburse t .Count or th cost o~acquirin en ~ E of ris~f-wa ~ea side oE ~onkli oad tng fro roadw ' Avenue ~eh fo ne hu~ red f ifGy feet°50' ) t a poin zero th an~d r the a cessar~~econ~~~iction ~of Conklin at t.~~rihe i oadway A nue - ersec-,t on. 8. Special traffic flow cha.nneliza'tion shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road tu prohibtt direct access of the Valley Pfall treafEic into the residential areas. The Broad way irnprovement shall extend from ar- Sullivan Road Ea5[ ttirough the Val.ley Mall Developraetit with required taners. An additional friction lane may be requireci by the County from two hundred fee[ (200') East of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. 15. Traffic Signals - The Developer's share of the cost of improvement or con- structing traEEic signals at the follawing intersections will be cocnputed upon the percent of traffic getierated by the Valley rlall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Spcabue el 94. 5ullivan and Mission Broadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadwa,y and the major Valley Aiall entrance ('the total cost by the developer) 16. Future Participation. Traffic generated tiy Ct1e Valley r1a11 may necessitate the widening of Broaciway Aventie f rom the Valley Mall d"evelopment East to Flora Road and Flora Road froca,Broadway South to Sprague. The full impa'ct of the Valley Mall cannot be determined at [his [ime. tlowever, the Develop'er should be pre- OVI. pared for future par[icipation,and sharing oF construc[ian costs,.-as determtned by the County Engineer., for these Cwo roads if traffic projections fram fu[ure pti'ases of the project warrant said improvements. 17.. There shall be no direct vehicular access frora thf.s proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of ttie circular access road Cv- as shown on the development plan.submitted wi[*h this application and approved by the Co,unty Engineer, or as appraded by the Coun[y. •i~ j ~ ,.4~ ~ ~ ~ ~`r~ ~~C.e,~ TitTB „ WHILE YOU WE " F O~..~T M t3"f 12 4 Areo Codis Num:batr Eactens3on l'EL.EPh[OiVED PLUGE CAL,L C,A,LLEOTOSEEYDU 'Will CALL AC,AIfV - W4NT''3 M 5.EE "YO'U ti.lRCENT REPURNEt3'YQUR CALL . ~ s ~ LMpemtor r ~ A t~AD 234ooo 50 sHr. Pp►n EEFIGIENGYS 23401 250 5F['E. DiSPEFiSER 8G7X _ ► ~ MEETING RECORD Date: Use to document a11 meetings with external parties dealing with County File No.: poei[ion on proposals. . IQ ~ r GO~~ ~ Al / Y n L Y Cq -,4 ~ 1 )V'F L,.,j Meetinge With. R o~ Q r~ 7-u r Represented By: County Attendees: , SPec i f i c ToPi c(s): N't..a eo o S~. A~" p I' t S t.,..~ ~e, ' f'4o GAR Y AI. 6`3 ~ u w,., ~ Proposals Presented : k w Qw~4- ~ ~ o tx,,~-~~ f7l A, ~v f ~ , County Posi[ion Stated: -1~c c t v'le rev~sY s ~~o•-~-~.~ L c h ' ~t . . S. -Th , s -e v Js i a►- !'e~o~`~ o `In , ~ ~ f vA ~t rrr~ A 11 ~r°.i S h a'~, l~I( c!~dl ~ r ?4' s ti a~,, ~`he;K ~ ~•S. Ttie o~ c u • h e or i -Y'0 7Fn a~ c s s J r o~- ~ a w a. -t - ~ l~ a!/~ r' 1 a A~ cP S- f 7~,v f~i d~ ~ f'~ .S ✓ 1n TD /k r e~. . ( l t~•.. e C Gv~.~ Q ~f i S w' . ~ ti..'~ n o R `~-h6 s~- • ~ ; ,J f~ e r'~ . e lte s1oEAi C o.w r►" e rc, c* , r o r h-e e J c G~ w ~e v e ffl.) f' ~ , c . . DistributioR: % 1) Pruject File 2) Divisiun Nead ~ 3) Co. Engineer ~ 4) Attendees a Use back or additional sheets for detail of ineeting if necessary. 509/6 ~ a 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 1 / I / f U ~ 9 ~C~ ' " ~ ► ~ ~ ~ ~-A ~ ~ . ~ ~ i , 51, r ~ 'i ~i ~ I~ . ~ p ~ ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ b i ~ i I ~ I 1  i~ ~ i~ i . . . . . . i I E E s s s~.~......mo-....®...........~ t ~ i C b i i ~ ~ i 3 1€ i E I var I { k d i i ~ ~ t t ; ~ i i i I I i t a I I ~ ~ 3 { ~ E I I i a i I i i i s F , i a I i I i I a E i k t t  _ _ a _ _ I 3 - - - _ - ~ i - - - - - 9 _ _ _ - - _ _ 3 1 Y p i i . - . .