ZE-0061-97
16
Q- RECE IVED ~
~ uCT 0 1 1998
SPOKANE C0UNTY HEARING EXA1ViINER
SPOKANE COUNT`f ENGINEER
RE Zone Reclassification from the Urban ) FIIVDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-3 5(tJR-3 5) and the ) CO1vCLUSIONS,
Urban Residential-22 (LTR-22) Zone to ) AND DECISION
the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone )
Applicant Maxwell & Sinto L L C )
File No ZE-61-97 )
I SiJ1VI1VIARY OF PROPOSAL AND I)ECISIOIV
Proposal Zone reclassificahon from the Urban Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5) zone and the Urban
Residential-22 (LTR-22) zone to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, for a medical office
building
Decision Approved, subject to conditions
n FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Heanng Exanuner has reviewed the zone-reclassification applicanon and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusians
A GEIVERAL INFORIVIATION
ApplicantlLegal Ovaner Maatwell & Sinto L L C, c/o James Wolf, 422 West Riverside
Avenue, Suite 407, Spokane, WA 99201-1186
Address 1409 North Houk, Spokane, WA
Locahon Generally located south of Maxwell Avenue, north of Suito Avenue, west of Houk
Street and approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road Spokane Washington
Legal I)escription Lots 1-3, Block 2, Mission View Addition, as recorded in Book "T" of
plats, page 27, in the NW '/4 of Section 15, Township 25 North, Rangt 44 EWt%'4 Spoka
County, Washington
Zoning Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 S) ar►id TJrban Resi0 1 nti a] ^2 ;t TR 22)
Cornprehensive Plan Category The property is designated in the Urban category of the
Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive P1ali -+2c, ,s alsj 1 jj iti `.ne Pnonty ej
SCrvice Area, Urban Impact Area and Aquife 3.. 1 ~ c " - Jwsqu irt tli- C -n
I-lan
Environmental Review A Determinatlon of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division
of Building and Plammng on Apnl 10, 1998
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 1
4
~
~
Site I)escriptflon The site is approximately 1 45 acres in size The site is generally flat,
and is developed with three (3) single-family residences, a duplex and associated outbuildings
The property is located within the Intenm Urban Growth Area (IUGA) boundanes designated by
Spokane County under the Washington State Growth Management Act In 1995, the westerly
96 acres of the site was rezoned from the UR-3 5 zone to the UR-22 zone, for the development
of 28 multi-family residential wuts The easterly 49 acres of the site adjacent to Houk Street is
zoned UR-3 5
Surrounding Condit'ons The site borders on Sinto Avenue, Houk Street and Maxwell
Avenue All three streets are designated as Local Access roads by the Spokane County Artenal
Road Plan Pines Road and Mission Avenue, which are designated as Pnncipal Artenals, are
each located within 400 feet of the site Stnp commercial development is typically found along
Pines Road, and professional office uses and a hospital are found along Mission Avenue in the
area The hospital is located directly east of the site across Houk Street Single-fanuly homes
are found between the site and commercial development along the east side of Pines Road A
funeral home and vacant land are found south of the site and Sinto Avenue, and vacant land and
medical offices are found north of the site across Maxwell Avenue The Major Commercial
category of the Comprehensive Plan lies west of the site along Pines Road, but does not abut it
ProJect I)escription The application proposes to rezone the entue site to the UR-22 zone, for
development of a single-story medical office building with a building footpnnt of 10,000 square
feet, and a sociated parlang and landscaping All existing buildmgs on the site would be
removed for development The site plan illustrates a six (6)-foot high sight-obscunng fence
along the west property line, as required by the UR-22 zone An extraordinary building setback
of approximately 40 feet is shown between the north 204 feet of the west property line and the
north boundary of the site The landscaping shown on the site plan along the borders of the site
is less than required by the Zorung Code, but the applicant seeks an admuustrative deviation
under the Zorung Code to adjust such landscaping requirements The site plan illustrates 71
parlcing stalls, whlch is in excess of the parlang requirements of the Zoning Code Three (3)
points of access are illustrated for the project, one located on each of the three adjacent roadways
B PROCEDIJRAI.IIVFORIVIATION
Applicable Zoning ltegulations Zoning Code Chapters 14 402 and 14 622
gIearang Date and Location A:ay b, 1998, -jpakm i ,~-ounty Pi,,blic Wat 1ca, B uilding,
Lower Level, Commissioners Aisembly Room, 1026 \1V.-.St Brc -idway, Spokane WA
Notices Mailed Apn121, 19° S a 1~. (want
Posted Apn121, 1998 by applicant
Published Apn116,
Compliance The t forpiAow nol ICL tdve v~Gn I-net u
~
I
Site V'sit May 5, 1998
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 2
i
`
s
~
Heariag Procedure Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Examiner Ordinance)
and 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure ,
Testimony
Tammy Jones Dwight Hume
Division of Building and Planning 107 South Howard, Suite 325
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99201
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Items Noticed Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code,
Spokane County Code, and County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0294 Final rezone
decisions for the site and m the vrciruty, as referenced in the record
C ZON]E RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS
1 General annroval cntena
The County Heanng Examiner Ordinance authonzes the Heanng Exammer to grant, deny
or grant with such conditions, modifications and restnctions as the Examiner finds necessary to
make a rezone application compatible wlth the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan and development regulations See County Resolution No 96-0171, Attachment "A',
paragraphs 7(d) and section 11, and RCW 36 70 970 Development regulations include without
limitation the Spokane County Zomng Code, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the
County's Local Environmental Ordmance (chapter 11 10 of the Spokane County Code)
Section 14 402 020 of the Zomng Code authonzes amendments to the Code based on any
one of six (6) grounds, without differentiating between amendments to the zomng text of the
code and amendments to the official zorung map Zoning Code 14 402 020 (1) authonzes the
Code to be amended if it is " consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detnmental to
the public welfare " Zomng Code 14 402 020 (2) authonzes a Code amendment where "
[c]hange in economlc, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification
of this Code " These are the most relevant cntena for consideration of the current rezone
application
The provisions of the Zomng Code are to be interpreted so as to carry out and unplement
the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the veneral plans for physical
dedelopment adopted by the Board of County Commissioners Zorung Code 14 100 104 fhe
Zoning Code also states that when the Code conflicts with the Cofnprehensive Plan, or other
adopted plans and regulations of the County or other regulatory agencies, the more restnctive
provxsions shall govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zorung Code provisions will be
met as a minlmum Zoning Code 14 100 106 The Comprehensive Plan itself indicates that it
should b(, used as a reference source and guide for making land use decisinw, Compreheraive
P'laaz, p The applicable "decision guidelines" set forth in the Plan aie to be used as a guide o
determine whether a particular proposal should be approved, conditioned or denied
In considenng a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that (1) there
is no presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 3
e
0
~
conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and (3) the
rezone proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare
ParkndQe v Seattle, 98 Wn 2d 4549 462 (1978), and Biarnson v Kitsap Countv, 78 Wn App
840 (1995) Also see RCW 36 70 340 and RCW 36 70 020 (11)
General conformance with a comprehensive plan is normally required before a rezone can
be approved Cihzens for Mount Vernon v Citv of Mount Vemon, 133 Wn 2d 861, 873 (1997),
Cathcart v Snohomish Countv, 96 Wn 2d 201, 211-12 (1981), and Bassaru v Countv
Commissioners, 70 Wn App 389 (1993) Some cases have dispensed with the changed
circumstances requirement where the rezone closely implemented the policies of the
comprehensive plan Btarnson v K.itsan Countv, 78 Wn App 840, 846 (1995), and Save Our
Rural Environment v Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983) Where a
comprehensive plan conflicts with zoning regulations, the provisions of the zoning code will
usually be construed to prevail See Weverhaeuser v Pierce Countv, 124 Wn 2d 262 43 (1994),
CouL:rar Mt Assocs v ICiniz Countv, 111 Wn 2d 742, 755-57 (1988), and Naeataru Bros v
Commissioners, 108 Wn 2d 477, 480 (1987)
2 Annlicable Comnrehensive Plan nolicies
The proposal is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban
category is intended to provide the opportunity for a` citylike' environment, wtuch includes
vanous land uses, residential development and a lugh level of public facilities and urban
services It is prunanly a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family, and
condomiruum buildings along with neighborhood commercial, light industnal, and public and
recreational facilities
The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of one (1) to 17 uruts per
acre, with allowances for ` bonus densities" within developed areas where utilines, artenals,
schools, and commuruty facilities have already been established The more intensive uses in the
Urban category, such as light industnal and neighborhood commercial, should be located near or
along the heavily traveled streets The least intensive single-family residential uses should be
isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily structures will usually be a transitional
use located between single-family residential and the more intensive areas See Comprehensive
Plan, Section 1, "Purpose ' and ` Detailed Defirution
The Urban category includes the following relevant objectives and decision guidelines
Decision Guidehne 1 1 1 Urbczn 1 mlopm-rst w/11 nr apprOVPd If8 al'ef1S
having adequate power supplies wRter sa,tttary ind stoi 7rt s e vUers
streets and school andfire servic-spYOUrded that such deve'ot)wicnt rnPets
the rntent of other Objectives and Deo-rsrort cedelcnes of this sectior
Deciston Gutdelrne 1 14 A variety uf"r,~ es and resad~ a<<al f.cses
should be available to provide a fi eedom of E uic.- to liwe r~j Urbr-) ►y area
with varying densities combtnatton,~, oi irio of a.~es (seE dQtatied tlj b~iri `
definrhons)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 4
J
~ i
Decision Guidelrne 116 Development utilizrng construction methods
szte planning and/or landscaping methods which are considered
innovative should be approved tf the tntent of Plan Objectives or Decision
Guidelines rs maintained
Decision Guidellne 13 3 Al! Urban development proposals should
require public sanitary and storm sewer systems or interrm sewer systems
to protect water qualtty
Goal 15 Encourage a healthful and pleasing envtronment in the
County s resadentral areas
Decision Gutdeline 15 I Buffering and/or landscaprng will be used to
mitigate the differences between proposed developments and existrng uses
Objective 1 S c Encourage paved streets and sidewalks in exrshng and
future developments where they are appropriate to the nature of the
development
Decision Guldeline 15 4 Stdewalk facclities will be required along
arterials connecting residential areas with community facilities andlor
commercial areas
Objective 1 S e When a nerghborhood experiences pressure for change rn
character such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review
Objective 15 8 When determinrng whether a proposal wrll change the
exasting land use character of an area factors to consider may include
a) the structure hetght of the proposal rn relation to structure
herght of nearby structures and
b) whether new structures will have a posrhve or negative impacl
upon the neighborhood s architectural character
Decision Guidelcne 1 61 Before land use proposal are approved they
should
a) conform to plans policres and regulations of County water sewer storm sewer
utilrty and specral service drstricts,
b) conform to County transportation plans and policres and
c) identtfy and take steps to resolve significant adverse impacts upon existing
utilctres (i e water sanrtary and storm sewers utility avarlable and future
energy resources) and trajfzc systems
The property is also located withm the Urban Impact Area (LIIA) designated in the
Coinprehenbive Plan This is an area where growth, development and higher iantensities of land
use are encouraged Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14 1 a The UTA sechon of the
Comprehensive Plan uidicates that traditional urban problems such as incompatible land use5,
environmental pollution and traffic congestion will be managed with greater attention to the
general public's well-being inside the LJIA Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14 1 e
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 5
C
~
3 As conditioned, the nronosal eeneraliv conforms with the Comprehensive Plan, comvlies
with annlicable develonment reeulations, and bears a substantial relationship and would not be
detnmental to the uublic health. safetv and welfare
The easterly third of the site is currently zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5), which zone
is intended to promote areas of pnmanly single-fanuly residential use in an urbaruzed setting
Zorung Code 14 616 100 The westerly two-thirds ( 96 acres) of the site was rezoned to the UR-
22 zone in 1995, for the development of 28 multi-family units The decision adopted for this
rezone appears to have overstated the size of the site involved by 33 acres, and approved a
density of multi-family uruts above the maximum density authonzed by the UR-22 zone, even
under bonus density provisions (which were not applied for) See Findings of Fact, Conclusions
and Order in File No ZE-28-95 dated 9-21-98
The applicant proposes to rezone the easterly third of the site to the Urban Residential-22
(LTR-22) zone, eliminate the previous site plan and multi-fanuly project approved for the westerly
two-thirds of the site zoned UR-22 in 1995, and develop the total site for a one-story medical
office building Zorung Code 14 622 100, sets forth the purpose and intent of the UR-22 zone as
follows
The purpose of the UR-22 zone rs to set standards for the orderly ^
development of residential property rn a manner that provrdes a desirable
livrng environment that is compattble with surrounding land uses and -
assures the protection of property values It is intended that this zone be
used to add to the variety of housing types and densities and as an
imDlementataon tool for the ComDrehensrve Plan Urban CateQOrv General
charactertstics of these areas tnclude paved roads public sewer and water
accessibtltty to schools and ltbraries and a full lrne of pubhc services
zncludcng manned fire protection and public transit accessibrlity Out'ces
are Dermrtted in the UR-22 zone rn order to provide some of the service
needs Qenerated bv htgh-intensitv land uses The highest densitv residential
zone. UR-22 is rntended Drcmarilv for multiple-familv dwellrnes and r.s
usuallv located adiacent to maior or secondarv artenals It is used as a
transition between low or medtum density mulhple-l'amilv uses and intensave
commerczal or low tntensrtv rndustrral uses and to provide for higher densitv
housing in locatrons close to emDlovment, shoppinQ and maior
transDOrtatton where movements ofneoDle can be handled effirrentlv and
with least overall adverse impact
Medical offices, and business or professional cffices are a permitted Lsr irz.tllc, UP-22 zone
Zoning Code 14 605 040 The site is not located alon¢ a n+ ljor or set,oxadary arte.rials as d^
preferred for uses located in the UR-22 zone, but has near and converuent access to the major
artenal-tsystems Mission Avenue north of the site ;i t vtAr~ped hlith rried)eal offices, ar dPTri~us
Road to the west is developed wrth intensive commpi,ial a-,Ps A hospilal is also lor atc.- -dsi _}I
the site across Houk Street, and the lind to the soutli cansists of a parlcing tot for a.fix iezal horriz
Wrule the site is abutted by single-family residences dlrectly to west, the proposed one-story
office building would be a much less intensive use than the multi-family project approved at an
excessive density of 29 units per acre The medical office would also act as a buffer between the
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 6
►
~
nearby hospital and the single-family residences The proposed height of the proposed medical
office building would most likely be lower than the buildings in the multi-family project that was
approved, would generate less traffic and would operate dunng normal daylight business hours
The project is also located close to employment, shopping and major transportation routes
The UR-22 zone has a maximum building height of 50 feet, and requires a six-foot-high
walUsolid landscaping/site-obscunng fence adjacent to a UR-3 5 zone Zorung Code 14 622 335
and 14 622 365 The building height of the proposed one-story medical office would be
significantly less than this maximum height The required sight-obscuruig fence is illustrated
along the west property line of the site
Landscaping is required along all boundanes of the site, as set forth in the Staff Report The
applicant seeks to deviate from the requued landscaping, pursuant to a provision of the Zorung
Code that allows admuustratrve adjustments to required landscaping when over 15 % of the site
would be required to be landscaped See Zorung Code 14 806 080 In requeshng reduction of
required landscaping along all properiy boundanes, the applicant proposed a higher type of
landscaping on all but the west boundary of the site, where no landscaping is shown on the site
plan of record
No public comment was received regarding the proposal at the public heanng A letter was
received from the owner of the single-family residence located on land abumng the south half of
the west boundary of the site, who expressed some general concerns about traffic from the site
and view of the parkulg lot, and-requested that the boundary in this area be "dressed up" or rucely
fenced See letter dated 3-27-98 from Jeff Marshall The apphcant's agent pointed out at the
public heanng that a sight-obscunng fence was illustrated on the site plan along the west
boundary of the site, and that landscaping could be installed along the west boundary line See
testimony of Dwlght Hume
The Heanng Examiner, in a letter to the applicant dated June 26, 1998, indicated that the
project would be approved, subject to the entry of wntten findings and decision In the letter, the
Examiner recommended that if an admirustrative adjustment to requued landscapi.ng for the
project was authonzed, that 20 feet of Type I landscaping be provided along the west boundary
of the site as required by the Zoning Code This was responded to by the apphcant's architect,
Gary Bernardo in a letter dated July 2 1998 Bernardo requested that a landscapmg plan be
adopted which would provide 12 feet of Type I landscaping along the south 82 feet of the west
site boundary, all of wluch would be of a sight-obscunrig screen type This would be in lieu of
the xequired 20 feet of Type I landscaping only five (5) feet of which is required by the Zoning
Code to be sight-obscunng Bernardo further commented that 43 feet of Type I landscapiug
would be provided along the remalrung 203 feet of the west property line, most 4f which is
adjacent to the proposed building All such landscaping would be in addition to a sight-
ohscunng fencl-
In a Ietctci to-, Gary Bernardo dated September 25, 1998, the Exammer indicated trhat he
Woul I have Y , objection to such pruposal, but would leave any adjustments to required
landst.-iping up to Division of Bwlding and Planrung staff The Examiner is convmced that the
review process will provide an adequate buffer for the single-family property owners residing
west of the site
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 7
4
Regarding required traffic improvements, the applicant has agreed to pay $4,287 89 through
a voluntary mitigation agreement to the Wastungton State Department of Transportahon
(WSDOT), to mitigate impacts to the Interstate 90 freeway interchange at Pines Road, and the
Pines Road and Nlission Avenue intersection The applicant is also required to install sidewalks
along the three streets abutting the site
The proposal has been conditioned for compliance with the development standards of the
UR-22 zone and the Spokane County Zoning Code The procedural requuements of SEPA
(chapter 43 21 C RCV) and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11 10 of the
Spokane County Code) have been met No comments were received from public agencies
requesting withdrawal or alteration of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the
project by the Division of Building and Planiung The record indicates that the proposal as
conditioned will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment
2 Conditions in the area in which the propertv ls located have changed substantially since the
nronertv was last zoned
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself The Zorung Code references changes m"economlc,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone Spokane County
Zorung Code Section 14 402 020 (2) Washington courts have not required a"strong' showing
of change The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts Bassaru v Countv
Commissioners, 70 Wn App 389, 394 (1993) Recent cases have held that changed
circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed rezone implements policies of a
comprehensive plan Biarnson v Kitsap Countv, 78 Wn App 840, 846 (1995), Save Our Rural
Environment v Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983) As discussed above, the
project generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan
A number of changes have occurred in the area that support the rezone proposal Tlus
includes the 1985 rezone of the westerly two-thirds of the site to the UR-22 zone, a.nd other
rezones in the are for medical offices and other commercial uses The extension of public sewer
to the area, increased traffic and growth in the area, and growth of the nearby hospital and
associated medical offices are also changed conditions that support the rezone
III DECISgON
~
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions «bove, the above applicat7on far a zone
reclassification is hereby approved, subject to the cc1nditions of the vanous r,abli(, agencies
specified below Conditions added or slgnificanXly -ilt ikc? l-y the Hearang f-xarnmer aae
rtalicized
Fa~,lure to comply with the conditions of this apf rova1 •ray result zn ievocatioriof 1-his
approval by the Heanng Examiner Tnis approval does nut walve the applicarYt s JblAgatiori to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with junsdiction over land development
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 8
r •t f B
~
SPOI{ANE COUNTY I)IVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and
access plans
3 A parlang plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, locahon and arrangement of parlcing stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by velucles
4 The construction of the roadway improvements requued herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer
5 Road unprovements and curb were installed on Maxwell Avenue, Sinto Avenue and Houk
Road per RID #419 Pnor to the release of a building permit, sidewalk shall be constructed
along Maxwell Avenue, Sinto Av-,nue and Houk Road
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bndge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resoluhons pertairung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and dramage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
S No construction work is to be performed within the exishng or proposed nght of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engmeer All work wnthin the public road nght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
9 All required construction withm the existing or proposed public ng11t of wdy is to be
completed pnor to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amaunt estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or unprovements shall be filed with the
County Ergjneer
10 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spoka~ie Co znty nghtvi
jvay per Spokane County standards
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 10
0 i
sPo~~ ~~UNTY DMslON BUrLDatvG Av~ PLANrdiNG
1 All condrtions imposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors
2 The zone change applies to the following real property Lc}ts 1-3, Block 2, NI1ssion View
Addition as recorded in Book "T" of plats, pa;e 27 Records of Spokane County, Washington
3 The proposal shall comply with the brban Residential-22 (UR-22), the Aquifer Sensitive
Area Overlay zone(s), and other applicable provisions of the Spakane County Zoning Code, as
amended
4 The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Heanng Examiner Vanations, when approved by the Director of the Division
of Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone Ail vanations must
conform to regulatlons set forth in the Spokane County Zorung Code and the onginal intent of
the development plans shall be maintained The sate development plan of reeord submrtted on
March 3 1998 does not rllustrate complrance wath the landscapang requrrements of the County
Zoning Code Such complrance shall be demorastrated prtor to the release of a buildrng permat
or occupancy of the proposed medacal office
5 Approval is requued from the Director of the Division of Buildrng and Planrung/designee
of a spec2fic lighting and sigiung plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any
building pernut 4
6 Direct light from any extenor area lighting fxture shall not extend over the property
boundary
7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisians for the mazntenance acceptable
to the Directar of the Divislon of Building and Plantung/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project pnor to release of any building
permlts Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access pvints is
not obscured or impaired
8 The Division of Building and Planrung shall prepare and record wlth the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice nohng that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special
conditac~n-~ imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title ATcstlce shall vexxi, ds
public noxice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in questiori The Title Notice
should be recorded wrthin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, )n fiull or in part, by the Dtvision of Buildrng and Plan.iung The Tatle Nooce iIl
generally provide as follows
The parcei of praperty legally des,,nbed as Lots 1-3, Block 2, Mission VYew Add t~~11 AS
r%.c.orded in Book ` T" of plats, page 27 Reeords of Spokane County, Washington is Ylle subject
of a land use action by a Spokane County Heanng Examiner on 1VIay 6, 199$,lmposing a vanety
of special development condrtions F1le No ZE-61-97 is available for inspection and copying in
the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Pa~e 9
~
1
~
DATED tlus 1" day of October, 1998
SPOI{A►NE COiTNTY HEAItING EXAMIVElt
Michael C Dempsey, WSBA # 35
1VOTgCE OF FINAI.. DECISION AND NO'B'ICE OF RIGH'I' TO APPEAI..,
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Heanrig Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanyuig SEPA
deternunation is final and conclusive unless withm ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
wntten decision, a party of record aggneved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington However, RCW 36 70B 110 (9)
mdicates that admmistrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the board of county commissioners wrthvn fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision -
Tlus decision was masled by certified mail to the Applicant on October 1, 1998
DEPEIVDING ON WHICH APPEA.i. PE1tI0I) REFERENCEI) ABOiE LEGALLY
APpI,IEg, THE APPEAI, CL,OSI1vG DATE IS EITHER OCTOBER 9,1998 OR
OCTOBER 15,1998
The complete record in this matter, including tlus decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod
with the Office of the Heanng Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490 The file may be inspected
dunng normal worlcing hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the
hours of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 12
f
SPOKANE REGIONAI. HEALTH I)ISZ'RICT
1 The sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Du-ector of Uhlities, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A public sewer system shall be made available for the project and individual service
provided The use of individual on-site sewage disposal system will not be authonzed
5 The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolubited
SPOKANE COITIVTY I)IVISION OF iJ1'ILITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connechon to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed A
sewer connection permit is requued
2 Applicant shall submit expressly to the Spokane County Utilities Division "under separate
cover" only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for public sewer
connections and facihties for review and approval The plans shall be submitted pnor to the
issuance of the sewer connection permit
3 A.rrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for pnor to issuance
of sewer connection permit
4 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
SPOI{ANE COUN'I'Y Alit POLL,LTTION CONTROL, AUTHORIT'Y
1 All air pollution regulations must be met
WASHINGTON S'TATE I)EPARZ'MEN'g' OF TRAIVSPOItTATIOlv
1 The proje ct sponsor shal] contnbute a%um of $4,287 89, through a voluntary agreement, to
WSDOT for the traffic impacts associated with the development of a 13,600 square foot medical
office building which is tied to the dbove rezane request This payment to WSDOT is due pnor
to the release of any bwlding pexmits Ttlis rnitigation agreement shall conform to the provisions
af voluntary agreements as outlined in Chapter 82 02 RCW
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-61-97 Page 11
IcINIr-ry TdA-p
~ ~ -
61,91
Z-
to '
o ~
y Q ,
O '
~
~ ~ MAN IELD
~ ~ E ~ - 1 e-~t~N ~
M A - '
}.~I, t'a t-1 C) ~ - °''~^`r''~ • ~
1965 - ~ -..J'.L. jll~
v
~
mct4 GOIdb"
0 ~
4
9G - ~
5 5.4. 0 N~--~~,
g M4 . ~ ,
~•x`r"'~,.~ ~''`V~ _ ~ iWT
ui
O 5~ ~
SjµTO 41
BC)ONE < DESrnE'~ ~9M T ~'°"'y_ p
,t • r , _ a
, j)~SN4E~ 1 • n~
Or3"E T ~ M,at~LrpNt GT
~ ' ~ Blck~ 4
i,, ~p O m G' W ~
T ~
~
E L
A
Qv
I~t~~`'r~h r'l y
v
~ ~ " !A
° E. `'t '
LL - ~
EY ~
~
~1f U3 •~C£ 4 RiVERStOE ~ -
lu x
~ 1 ~ , ci ~ ~ z flRA►~U~
3 ~ E • . _ . , _
r9~ ~
rlat t° S~G~ ~
.r.v, I '
~ ADJACEM aDJAGENT L
PROP£RTY PRoPERTY PROJEGT INFORMATION '
I r
ZGNED UR 35 ?ONED UR 12
L-L- r", 'nEDfGAL 05E ~ L Ek15TING ZGNE UR 12 A UR 35 ~
3 D WDE W/ TTPE I I~~S D I` 1 PROPOSED ZONE UR 42 IALU
LANDSGAPINCs ~FL
YAM~ AWNG 3 LOT AREA 63423 f146 AC2°51 N
L 4 4 6lOG. AREA 10000 SF (SINGLE #
} f«b~. . _ ~1
0 570RT w/ DAYLIGNT
Vr J - - - - --r- x ~ 8A5EMcNT z
I , 0
Q
~•Il~Utiy °ul v a ~ 5 BLDG COVERaGE 10)000/63423 15-119'
~ r 6 LANDSCAPE AFEA (1NCL SWAI.ES) 19600 SP I TYPE ~ LANDSCAPE REQ D (SEE PLdN) a'
I II \ 1-" I I ~ 0 OLDG U9E hEDtC•aL/PROF O+=rICE W
DATLIGUT BAS^tcNT~.,, I~ MI •I~ g ~ ~ StORhCaE
GAR7cN COURT ~ FEZ Ern//e/ ~~,p „
' aseoi + - 3 0 UiDE lL/ Tl'P_ ` ~Q D PARCING I0000/110 59 IMED ) ~ ~rcr+ec uR 3 • ~ LdND~CAPING 3150/350 9 fPRGf J
` IL 1u ~ a ` `I 5B20R000 3 (STOR) _
I MAI LEvEL ErITRT , ~al I ll PAfQCS TOTAL ~
a I ADJACENT 10 pAR<J, PROvIDED 11 .1
„ A
I (L i t i~ ' ZF`RqPERrY
~ a'EN SPACE (ExCL PAVED AREAS} ti
OND R 22 1t OF
ADJACENT 13 dn ~ ~ IvALLEY WOSPI ALI 1960m/63423 30°Og a
PF2J°_R Y ~
~ i MEDIGdL OFFICE51 11 BLpCs SETBAChS
ZON_D UR 35
~ ~ Q y ~
1 ~ q~ 0%'~ ~ Irl FRONT (NORTN i SQUTN) 25
~ 0 51 D E ( U R 35 a UJE5T). 5
70
7t c ei F1AA9CING (EAST} 25
~i ~ Y~ ~ I^I ~i 17 } 9
APPLlCANT
~s , zo 6z ,
MAkUJELL SINTO L1G ~ ► ° 3
c I•'' C/O JAMES A. WOI.f*' MANdCsING MEPIBER m u~
LOU._R Lc _v„cL ENTRT- 1401 US BANK BLDG SPGlG1Nc W/.l a
~ ~PA567 I~EL
D807 i I( 1 (509) 69d 2I61 ~
\ J ~
6 0 N SIGI~T -I`~,\\\` _ N Zw~tED urs )s ~ 1
~ } V_
W_~ ~
5 5 G1 1R I N G F E'h tC E I ~ A E N T J
I J I ~ po
PROP LI`N Sr DW tG U T J G A~' t E J
101 5 b10WdRD 5?E 325
~ t ' SPOKANE WA r,
~v PaAcs I ` (509) 456 1402 ~
I s~~eo~ Pss~icF-eos %0 >
I( za~So ua u za+eo uR n roTa.
~ i ~ •
51DE I '
I~ w,u ~ u p H~VA
Yar~ ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ ; ~ M SUBJECT S1TE
1 0 z q~ il o„
00 DRaI AGe
T
I 6~17093 ;,1~-- k
A i J, ~ i 3 0 WIDE W/ TYPE
LAAlDSCAPII~,'1 9( A~A I 3 3 o
1332 I Aa
/
AY E M z NeL
ADJAGENT U"0~ Sltl II m '
9 SI11S I I 1i\ ~D UR 35 N
G9 auu i ao a O (HJNERAL E) , G-1
SITE PCAN
OF RECORD
~r► ~ t
, •
. 'o :
~ r 1
a g
tJ1 AN 1ELD
•1' _
►Ji A = ' ` ~ ~
19 s g
~
E L
GONf~ 0 ~
- _ • ' Q ~ ~V F-~
90 tc S 5 O
J uaAA ~°n ~ ~ ,
I _ .
7 tNT .
0
cc ID
All, E "t
~ESM A,~poLD0
~ G
p,v E ~ l~►-r o,t.. o ~
DEcapAET > „~.aa.~ cr ~ ~ 1
DEy..B t ~ .y
n g-
~
o oc
w
i 3 p'Lfl6 C(
t ~ I
` qc.2/
cr $
~ ta1 rt
's•44 .
~ a
I n~~„SVn50Y
. _
t ~ v:~ ~ ~ p' ' .
. Q~,lvs A
a .
~
AY
EY
, Z = I
, .
8~.,7a0 ~ V r~ i
~ z d w ~ q R1V~~51OE ~ ~ z I
os D. ~ a ~ ~o
~A X _ I
~ ct
( r r+
~
hlot to scale
I i
~Q~ WAMON
~~T 1NF~i'7Y~ ~ ~CI~~t~T ~ ~
z,~w~ u ~ - 3~ ~ ~ ~t , -O hi GI~I~{NF~ T~ . >IF~i ~'l~J' 7~f 6 ~T ~ ug •#2Z * we- 3k 5~
~ ~N~ Z P ZON~: . t'~o DS~p
~ G~ M~PtT ~ - 3. I•~T ~I~ ~ G~~,~»2 ~77~RM SWRL~S ~ ~}4Y 6~fT ~ ~~,~2~ ~a~' C
~ I ~r It ~ v r.~r~c~a~rnt~ t 6~+~~N c.~cr,~r d~ ~ LG~ ~,~1 ~ (o $~`o S ~ f ~ ~ ~c..~~ M
I ~ 1 , , ` ~ ~I Q,~ ~~j1~ ~ . K"1. ~ i 1~1t ~ ~ ~ V ~/V~" 4f/ Y~~~ i
, ~ _ ~ I • , . ~r ` ~ i e y ♦ ~ 1 ~ + ~ ~ 1 ' 6 . LANG'~s~P~'r (INGG. ~ Crritc~.. S~YV~t.~1= 7~P~p S~ i
~ • . ` ' ' • ` . . J ~ ~AN~~ I~ ~ • _ ? . filP~ c~ ~Fro- FWP: ~ ~ ~N -2 ~
~ . ~ , . . . . . . . ~ ,~t~ • . . . , . ~ . , , . , , ~ M&V14AL-
c~ ~ ~ ~t~ u~~s M~~ . . 8. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ .
~ . zoK~ p ~~r~ I ov . 36 ~ L • u1W~R tt~ .
• ~,1~1. . , . • u 3~ to Nb r,~~ . . P~~ ~ , r c~2
I ~o u ~ • G{r c ~l. o O~N SP~~ C~ ~ ; ! w ~ o rc~s- Cv-x fAveP AM%57:
2 Sa 6~42 ~ M . ~
t " ~ ~ {{[IJ ~ . , ~ y. ~ ~ ~I.G~ ~T ~K y ^ ~T'
~ r . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • I At~~C+~ . G~ . ~'C' I ~ ~ . : o wrc~ w ~ ~ - 7H ~ D~[ . ~°~T C N~r~
P~l~~'Y . y r~ , . ~ . ~ ~ , , ,r~ , - ~ C~ w~ N~ h 6Ie0uNP PGR 680t? _ °1iG~' ~ U~ C7 , .
~ t AaJ . L , # . NKi h~16 C ~T 7 • • , . . w ~.ev~~ ~ ao ~ U ~ ~ ~a ~ 6S . . w , , p~ap. +ti . ~ ~ . A!,A PT7 • 2~~ °
r' ~ ~ ~./~'I ~ ~UN~ A - . ~ ~ao ~ ~ ~ ~ J . .
" ~1 ~'t r~ • u -72 H`oM~ . ~ , tr ~:ON&~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ' gv l5 ~ ~ ' L L ~G,~4N ~ ~
I Cn~ T q 5 . l~" 62 Z!? fi ~ u~~ ~ ,
i`~ ~ : . , ~~N~`~~, L•L~~ o a~ . , . I~ . ' .
. ~ , . . , c~ e~ A aU~ ~ • . o~'' ~ a -~y • , p ,.?,~Ni . W , I l,~ . • . ~ P~ WpUFre MANAOIK& MWftF, .5 1e-ANO-. Y4A ~
~ t 7 t~~ Ni~ ~ r d „ I ~ t ` C~'! 2~~~ Z
~ I ' . • .
~ , ~ ` ` '
' M , , ~~~r, r ~ ~ ~rJ 1"G'~' ~ ` ~ • ~ v
N ~l~ ~ . ,~,~rr~ c~v~[. . Q p~v ~ . . . ~ STAL~.~S ~ - ~ ~ . • ~1 ~7~ , ~ • r~ ~ . , L . ~v7 5• ~(~1NAf~P. , ~N Y , I~R 3 ~ •
. . ~ ~ ~ , ~ r; ~I ~Q r . ~~~1~' ~ • ; ' ~ . l~ J ~ ~ i
. . ~ Cao9~ ?~O'L . tt` ; I~ ~02
. . r : . , r; ~ ~ . ~ , ~
~ . ~ , , . . . , , ~ I • ~ . , . ,
I ~ r~' • ~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ i • . • `
. • . ~ti ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ z a 2C1 '
' ~0 W~~ W~ ~ ~5 ~ ~ N I N I. LA DSGAl~ b fl~N"~ . ~ ~
yA N ~p ; ~ ~ . . r - _ , . . ~ . .
~
. .
$crpardo • Ki]!s
~ ' Architects. P.C, ~ dn~{' ~j~ r~y, p P 1 a a e 1 n C
V ` ~(/~GI✓ ~I`1'~ Arahlteclure ~4 J ~4'vl' ~V~~~ I~~~ Intsrior: ` `Z
. Y ~i0~' l1~'l~Pl ~..~r ~ 4, 10T swl! e..u~l
~ ~ ~ ~ Pi2W A s~. ~ u~-~sii
_ ~ . . . ~
' i i i
a s ~.~r+~ ~ ~ . . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7
SITE PIAN
a~ RECORD
!
,
I':
~
. ~
~
~ , , . .
~
1 K1/1 M- 0 - , ~
< < ~ , ` 90
L-D-
?0
o c.m v.ft,►
~ ~ • sck. Aa.h. • r
; j Poa ►.4 i ~
, Tront
I - ' E1*m.
_ - ~ - _ -~'N►`~RO ~ - ~o ~ - E!lSL1D
AIRXIE'W
Q E 27
Hi h ~
z liw 1040 , G o ;
' R.a..~.
~ . i Scho f E~LICKEYE ~ M1.~I[f1• • < Rtl i ~ ~ ~ _
' KEY E
A ~ ~ • s ~
~ s~,,►r* \ o= E z
o .
~ 290 LE ° ; R.~.,~. Walk io ae P
~
F SUBJECT SITE Citi U
Z O ti_ ~ AMfl1( MoG
/
r '
%
a~vr. r,+CU
CMi ~ p~• - y +e`
NL ' t ~ t ~ ~ - 1
Kn
n
~ ►
1 A + )00 ,.p• . ~
►
l (
N 0 O ` .
W i
I _ 1400 ` USTA = • 400 C% ~
t t ~ WMIS51 N AVF--
NA , MAX~ 4• x MAXWEI.
IN - si o S;oo I 5 :
<
~ r a~c = i W (
E z a F- s'~ E ~ Boom
Gf~IET ~ 0 p~y T MET ; 0.
I 3oo
~ tut D E~o_ c
,Z Mth . a. ~ W M 27 c ~
aob N.u hool ■ o o >~.r I
L18 _ Z -a _ 'l~,w►~
~ ~ ~c PRING IELD or tnes
ce v► 3 < <oad
~ A ~ Jr. H.S~
oct riaa~ VE Z ~
J ~ Sch~l . J W '
200
~ °
p° ne N -5= too ;(VI
W v. ey H , 1 N M , M
~ T PA~~ R I V atv t Ofllm e
~ R
P ~ s oz P.O.
Y I iST ...I
~E W N V N \ ~ ~ c'~.~L°440 2ND AY W
s N m $HMAN ~ W OPPORT NI
V ~c
~ v r J~ W ce. = Y
AVE
~ f ti
AVE~
o f3r ic C, AVE em" •
6TH AV r W AV p ~
5 ~ Z W t ~
_ . ~ _ $ Z M ~ r
r > G~3 g •
Z
~ Z
r
tYt11t~ •
O
TM~ - q v i VE. ITMA~1
11-
High 1
~ J
YE. ~ O I rt
E. < ~ 3 u
t~l~ I H ~ c~~. 114
~YC f VE L~
~ ~
~ d
- - ~ z ~ i ven ,ty
INRP
B •WA V G N TY MAP
Hernardo • Mills I
Architacte. P.C.
DATE DWG. BY .J09 No. REF. SHT.
P 1 a n n i n L
Architecture DEG. 8, 'q-7 KB 96-249
Interiocs
r ~
107 SoulA Howard DESGRIPTION 5HEET
Suile /20
spor.ae, VA 99204 REZONE MAXWELL SINTO L.L.G. G-I.O
(soo) e38-4511
• i
Canceleci File ~ FNGINEER' S REV h 5HEET
Date Filcd
Date As Built Plans Receiveci
Date Road Plans Approved REZONE FILE # ZE-0061-9/ _97
New Road Starxiards 5-15-95 Mylar
Companion File
Hearing Date 05/06/1998 H Time: 01:30 H Numher: 3 Related File tl: ZE-0028-95,ZE-0099-55
Technical Review Date: 01/15/1998 TR Time: 01:15 Building Dept ~
Review Date: R Time: R Number: TCCH R.E~ Date Received: 01/02/1998 Review TyPe: L<+rge Lot :
No. Lot No. Ac; . .
Project Name: tJR-3.5 & UR-22 TO LRt-22 NIEDICAL OFFICE Range-Township-Section: 44- 25 - 15
Site Address: S MAXWELL,N SINTO/W HOUK/E PINES PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Applicant Name: HUME, DWIGHT J Phone f/: (509) 456-7402 45152.0801 45152.0802 45152.0803 45152.0s14
Applicant Address: 107 S HOWARD ST sTE 325 Phane 2#
SPOKANE, WA 99201
~Date Canciitions Mailed:
F(ovd Zone No Water 4 Sewer School 356 Fire 1 Phone
Billing Owner: MAXWELL & SINTO LLC-WOLF, JAM Engineer
Address: :lddress 422 W RIVERSIDE STE 1407 Company
SPOKANE, WA 99201 Acidress:
Phone: Phune: (509) 624-2161 Phone:
Fax:
Signed Name
Building # 456-3675 / Planning I! 456-2205 Contact: TAMMl' JONES
nate Suhmittfrl Descrintion
[plt~
03/10/1998 DATE TECHNICALLY COMPLETE [Traffic Analysis Required]
01i15/1998 DATE NOT TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
DATC PAY FEES RL-CEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED ANll COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~ I
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC t/ 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
in-Out a 1 ln-Out In-Ouc If3
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT
In-0ut #4 Iii-Out 1J5 in-Out !l6
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRf1INAGE I'fEM CALCULATCD I I
DATE BOND RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASE - DATE BOND REDUCED BOND BALANCE
i
Hearing Date I3ecision Approved v Denied Continued Appealed BCC r~ !
Appealecl to Court Approved Denied Continued
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHMCIAN (SY1.,
/ STAN1PFT) LOT !'1.:\ NS TO S F('RF TR1' tiD`i
,
r
Canct,ed File ENGINEJ~~~S REVIEW SHEF T
:
Date Filed
Date As Built Plans Received
Date Road Plans Approved TR REZONE FILE # ZE-0061-97 -97
New Road Standards 5-15-95 h4`•lar
Companion File /f:
Related File 1/: ZE-0028-95,ZE-0099-55
Hearing Date H Time: H Number:
Technical Review Date: 0 1/15/1998 TR Time: 01:I5 Building Dept
Review Date: R Time: R Number: TECH REVIEW #i
Date Received: 01/02/1998 Review Type: Large Loc I_i Bldg. Square Feet:
No. Lot No. Acre 1.43
Project Name: UR-3.5 & LTR-22 TO t1R-2214iEDICAL OFFICE Range-Township-Section: 44- ZS - 15
Site Address: S MAXWELL,N SINTO/W HOUK/E PINES PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Applicant Name: HUME, DWIGHT J Phone /l: (509) 456-7402 45152.0801 45152.0802 45152.0803 45152.0804
Applicant Address: 107 S HOWARD ST sTE 325 Phone 21J
SPOKANE, WA 99201
Flood Zone No Water 4 Sewer School 356 Fire 1 Phone Datz Conditions Mailecl:
Billing Owner: MAXWELL & SINt LLC-WOLF, JAM Engineer
Address: Address 422 W RIVERSIDE STE 1407 Company
SFOKANE, WA 99201 Acidress:
Piione: Phone: (509) 624-2161 plioiie.
Fax:
Signed Name
Buildin~ f/456-367i / Planriin~ tl 456-2205 Contact: TAMMY JONES
Dote Si inn Initi 1s ~
j' jCl~ DATE TECHNICALLY COMPLETE
DATE NOT TECHMCALLY COMPLE'I'E
DATE PAY FEES RECEIVED
DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TU ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED AND COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~ I
NOTICE TO PUBLIC / NOTICE TO PUBLIC 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
In-Out lil In-0ut 1/2 In-Out l/3
DESIGN DEVIATION DATES IN-OUT
In-OuI #4 In-0ul a~ In-Uut Mfi
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED I I
DATE BOND RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASE - DATE BOND REDUCED BOND BALANCE
Hearing Date Decision Approved Denieci Continuecl Appealed BCC Approved Denied
Appealed to Court Approved Denied Continued Final Project Status
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL)
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO SECRETARY (SANDY)
~ ~~"u'`~Q ~.l
~ ` ._-~.~1
~ ' } ~~~1~
t~ w ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ -
C~~~
,
,
~
~r ~
~
. ~
..l~✓ ~
DING PERMITS 11/18/97
I
EINALIZED
SITE ADDRESS NAME & PROJECT PARCEL # FILE# MYLAR BY DATE c
VERCLER N 1910 -MEDICAL OFFICES BLDG 4 4515 B70183 BM 5/10/69
VERCLER N 1410 #5 -MEDICAL OFFICE BLDG 9515 B70285 GN 8/22/89
VERCLER N 1419 43 STADLER & WESCHE-MEDICAL OFFICE 9515 B90299 BT 2/19/91
VERCLER N 1919 #6 WIERAIdD DR-MEDICAL OFEICE 9515 B90101 BT 9/21/90
VERCLER N 1512 HENRICHS-MEDZCAL OFFICE BLDG 95152 0306 B96136 J-32 DB 1/6/97
VISTA N 108 -SIGN POLE RELOCATE 9518 B70115 JS 2/9/89
VISTA N 111 #9 HATHA4IAY MEATS-ADD 95183 9128 B99102 PL 6/28/95 6/26/95
VISTA N 1728 SPO CO WATER DIST 43-PUMP HOUSE 95079 9069 B93093 BT 4/28/93
W NEwMAN LK N 10220 -BLDG ADD & REMODEL 5614 B90009 SE 2/26/90
W NEWMAN LK N 16108 SPO CO FIRE STATION-ADD STORGE 57273 9014 B93127 CR 9/9/93
WAIKIKI N 10628 WHITWORTH WD 02-ADD VEHICLC STG BLDG 36182 9097 B96031 DB 5/13/96
WAIKIKI W 2010 SPO COUNTRY CLUB-ADD INTER-REMODEL 2612 B91049 BT 5/31/94
WAIKIKI W 2923 WA DEPT OE WILDLIFE-OFE'ICE - EISH HATCHERY 2611 B91082 8T 5/31/99
4]AIKIKI W 2927 TRUCK STORAGE SLDG-WA ST DEPT OE' F&W 26115 9009+ B99117 PL 7/12/99
WAIKIKI W 2929 ST GEORGE SD-SCHOOL 2611 870136 GN 5/29/89
WAI,L N 6309 MINIT LUBE-QUAKER STATE 36303 2211 B99003 CR 4/13/94
WALL N 6422 ANIMAL CLINIC OF SPO-ADD 36309 2523 B94050 RT 4/14/94
WALL N 7212 HOLY CROSS-OFEICES & STORAGE 3630 870209 GN 10/16/89
WALL N 7212 HOLY CROSS CEMETERY-MAUSOLCUM 3630 890290 BT 1/16/91
WALL N 8415 COUNTRY HOMES CHRISTZAN CHURCH-ADD GYM 36193 036 B93097 PL 7/1/94
WALL N 8506 PITNSY BOWES-INTER REMODEL 3619 B92095 SE 8/10/92
wALL N 9408 PRESCHOOL-ADD 36105 9095 870219 JS 6/30/89
WALL N 9908 NORTH WALL SCHOQLS-PRE MFG CLASSROOM 36191 1912 B70005 SE 6/23/95
WRLNUT N 501 -CHURCH 9517 B70070 GN 9/20/88
WASHINGTON W 22809 GTE TEA GROUP-TOWER 50 04233 9006 B96215 DB 11/19/96
WASHINGTON W 22809 NEXTEL-TOWER COMM 63 6/FOUNDATION EQPT S 04233 9006 B97103 DB 6/20/97
WBILE E 9203 BILLS AUTO DISMANTLERS-ADD STORAGE BLDG 36271 9065 B93075 PL 1/17/95 1/17/95
WELLESLCY E 13406 SLAVIC CHRISTIAN CHORCH-PARKING 7 DRAINAGE 95031 1103 B97094 DB 3/25/97
WELLESLEY E 15520 LDS-CHURCH - PORTABLE CLASS ROOM 4501 B92006 BT 4/19/92
4VELLESLEY E 15711 EAST VALLEY SD H361-ADD MUSIC / THEATER EV 96363 9005 B97090 DB 9/30/97
WELLESLEY E 16929 SKYVIEW ELEMENTARY-ADD CLASSROOM EVSD 0361 45011 9093 B97033 DB 9/1/97
WELLESLEY E 21121 -STORAGE BLDG 5633 691060 BT 1/23/93
WELLESLEY E 21121 THRIFT CENTER- 5633 870023 GN 12/31/91
WELLESLEY E 21121 DEANS THRIFT URM-ADD 5633 B92073 BT 4/7/93
WELLESLCY E 21619 KINYON-ERIUT STAND 4J/ ATTACHED STG 56339 9085 896112 DB 7/28/97 7/28/97
WELLESLEY E 21902 NORMA S BURGER BARN-ADD REST 5503 B90036 BT 5/31/99
WELLESLEY E 22021 -ADD SELF STORAGE 5639 B92094 BT 10/20/92
WELLESLEY E 22300 EAST VALLEY SD #361-ADD OE'FICE BUS WASH BLD 66032 9039 B97102 DB 8/18/97
WELLESLEY E 22329 SPO CO-LIBRARY - OTIS ORCHARD 5503 B91028 BT 6/13/91
WELLESLEY E 23309 SPO CELLULAR TELEPONE- 5503 B92069 BT 6/23/92
WELLESLEY E 24001 ELECTRICAL TESING SERVICE- 56353 9218 B95022 KM 2/25/95
WELLESLEY E 24706 -STORAGE MINI W/MOBILE HOME (E 24806WELLESL 5502 B92005 BT 8/21/92
WELLESLEY E 29800 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE VII BL 55021 0161 B97116 DB 7/1/97
WELLESLEY E 24808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE VI BLD 55021 0161 B97052 db 3/31/97
WELLESLEY E 29808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE IV BLD 55021 0169 B99017 CR 3/19/99
WELLESLEY E 29808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE VI BLD 55021 0161 897091 DB 5/7/97
WELLCSLEY E 29806 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE V HLDG 55021 0161 B70000 SE 6/1/95
WELLESLEY E 24808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD MINI STORAGE PHASE III BL 55021 0161 B70003 SE 5/27/93
WELLESLEY E 24808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE V BLDG 55021 0161 B70002 SE 8/16/99
WELLESLEY E 29808 STOR-WAY RON WOOD-MINI STORAGE PHASE V BLDG 55021 0161 B70001 SE 5/31/99
WELLESLEY E 29817 -WHSE SALES RETAIL 5635 690017 SE 3/5/90
WELLESLEY E 29817 SHOP-ADD 5635 B70080 GN 5/15/69
WELLCSLEY E 8929 PASADEND RIDGE PHASE II-APT 66 UNIT (4 BLDG 46316 0623 B96050 J 15 DB 5/3/96
Page 30 of 31
RECE VED
r
'IV
~ fflw-~ 9 1998
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
l ~ STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE # ZE-61-97
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOICANE COI:TISITY
HEARING DATE May 6 1998 @ 1 30 p m FILE # ZE-61-97
PROJECT PLANNER Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on
approximately 1 43 acres for a medical office buiiding
STAFF RECOMNIENDATION Staff recommends approval of the zone reclassification request as
conditioned
Proiect Data
. Project LocaUon The site is generally located south of Maxwell
Avenue north of Sinto Avenue west of Houk Street
and approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road in the
NW'/4 of Section 15 Township 25N Range 44 EWM
Parcel Number(s) 45152 0801 45152 0802 45152 0803 45152 0804
Owner Maxwell & Sinto L L C c/o James Wolf
422 W Riverside Ave Suite 407
Spokane WA 99201-1186
(509) 624 2161
Agent Dwight J Hume
107 S Howard St Suite 325
Spokane WA 99210
(509) 456 7402
Comprehensrve Plan Designabon Urban
Zoning Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and Urban
Residential 22 (UR-22)
Existing Land Use Residential vacant and undeveloped land
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
o North Urban Residential 3 5(UR 3 5) and Urban
Residentiai 22 (UR 22) vacant land medical offices
• South Urban Residential 3 5(UR 3 5) funeral home vacant
and undeveloped land
o East Urban Residential-22 (UR 22) Hospital
• West Urban Residential 3 5(UR-3 5) single family
residences
Known Land Use Proposals and ZE-28 95 Zone reclassification from UR-3 5 to UR
Recent Project Approvals m the 22 on 1 29 acres of the subject property fior a 28 unit
Area of this Project apartment complex ZE 7 96 Zone reclassification
ZE 61 97
Staff Report May 6 1998 Heanng
1 of 6
~
~JR-3 5 to UR 22 for a professional office
`U~l~~ing located on Mamer Road 500 north of
Mission Avenue ZE 23 95 Zone reclassification
from UR 3 5 to B 3 for a 200 unit motel located north
of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and 300 feet east
of Pines Road ZE 36 94 Zone reclassification from
UR 3 5 B 1 and B 3 to B 3 for auto repair and other
uses located at the southeast corner of Pines Road
and Mission Avenue
Land Division Status The proposed project site consists of four tax parceis
The tax parcels consist of portions of previously
platted lots Prior to development of the site the
applicant will be required to aggregate the parcels
through a Certificate of Exemption
Shoreline Oesignation Not applicable
Water Purveyor Modern Electric Water Company
Sewage Disposal The site is currently served by an on site septic
systems Development of the site will require
connection to the County public sewer system
Fire District # Spokane County Fire Distnct #1
School District and nearest K-12 Central Valiey School District #356
schools
Nearest Arterial and Distance The site is located adjacent to Sinto Avenue Maxwell
Avenue and Houk Street and the Spokane County
Art2rial Road Plan identifies these streets as Local
Access Streets Pines Road and Mission Avenue are
both located within 400 feet of the site and are
designated as Principal Arterials within the Spokane
County Artenal Road Plan
Neighborhood Association None known
This proposal is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA)
This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA)
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area The subJect property is located within the
Pnority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
Cntical Areas Maps
Floodplain The site is located outside of the 100-year
floodplain
Geologically Hazardous Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps or Wetland Inventory
Maps
ZE 61 97
Staff RepoR May 6 1998 Heanng
2 of 6
S E PA .f.~
DNS issued on April 10 1998
Comment penod ends May 41998
IVoticinq
Published The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
April 16 1998
Mailing Deadline The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayer of land within 400 feet of the
site was April 21 1998
Site Posting Deadline The deadline for posting notice on the site was April 21 1998
1724 Comaliance Dates
Application Accepted December 29 1997
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued March 25 1998
Date Notice of Decision is Due September 28 1998
Reviewina Aaencies
14 Agencies were notified on January 2 1998 and April 10 1998 Comments were due on January 15
1998 and April 22 1998
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received - Received Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes April 16 Washington State Yes April 22
of Engineering 1998 Department of 1998
Transportation Transportation
Spokane County Division Yes January 6 Fire Distnct #1 No
of Engineering 1998
Development Services
Spokane County Division Yes January Modern Electric Water No
of Utilities 12 1998 Company
Spokane County Division No Spokane Regional No
of Utilities Water Transportation Council
Resources
Spokane County Division Yes January 6 Spokane Transit No
of Long Range Planning 1998 Authonty
Spokane Regional Health Yes January Spokane County Division No
District 15 1998 of Parks Recreation &
Fair
Central Valley School No
District #356
Spokane County Air Yes April 21
Pollution Control Authority 1998
Resaonses from the Public
Comments have been received from a neighboring property owner The property owner is requesting a
buffer between the proposal and his properly located west of and adjacent to the site such as a fence
and/or landscaping and expressed concerns about possible traffic The site plan of record illustrates a
required six foot sight obscuring fence along the west property line Section 14 806 040 of the Zoning Code
also requires 20 feet of Type I landscaping along the west property line
Descriation of the Site
The site is approximately 1 43 acres in size The site is generally flat and contains three single family
residences a duplex and associated outbuildings The application states that all existing buildings are to be
removed Access to the site is provided by Sinto Avenue Houk Street and Maxwell Avenue All three
ZE 61 97
Staff Report May 6 1998 Heanng
3 of 6
~ a
streets are designated as local access stree ►.y the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan Surrounding
uses include single family residences a hospital and medical center a medicat office funeral home and
vacant land Both Pines Road and Mission Avenue are located within 400 feet of the site and typical strip
commercial and professional office uses can 6e found along those roadways Pines Road and futission
Avenue are designated as Principal Arterials within the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan
Backqround
The applicant has requested a zone reclassification from Urban Residential 3 5(UR-3 5) and Urban
Residential-22 (UR 22) to Urban Residential 22 (UR 22) for a medical office building The application for the
zone reclassification was submitted to the Division of Building and Planning on December 29 1997 The
current use of the property is residential The subject property was previously zoned Agricultural Suburban
(AS) and crossed over to Urban Residential 3 5(UR 3 5) in January 1991 with the implementation of the
Spokane County Zoning Code A zone reclassification ZE 28 95 from Urban Residential 3 5(UR-3 5) to
Urban Residential 22 (UR 22) for a 28 unit apartment complex on 1 29 aces of the site was approved by
the Hearing Examiner Committee in September of 1995
Staff Analvsis
Comprehensive Plan
The subJect property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban category
is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a citylike environment which includes vanous
land uses The more intensive land uses such as light industrial and neighborhood commercial will be
located near the heavily traveled streets while the least intensive single family residential uses wiil be
isolated from the noise and heavy traffic Detailed Definition D( Noncompatible uses) states that due to the
variety and mix of land uses and a0ttivities found in the Urban category there are few activities that would be
inappropriate Many uses may require screening or other performance standards to make them compatibie
with one another Decision Guideline 15 1 states that buffenng and/or landscaping will be used to mitigate
the differences between proposed d~lvelopment and existing uses Decision Guideline 1 5 2 states that
landscaping may be required to provide a healthful and pleasing residential environment The proposal is
located a minimum of 400 feet from Pines Road and Mission Avenue in an area which has undergone a
transition over the last few years from single family residential to commerciai and professional offrce uses
Impacts to the adjacent single family homes can be mitigated through screening and landscaping
requirements
Zoning
The purpose and intent of the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR 22) zone is to set standards for the
orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is
compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values it is intended that this
zone be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities and as an implementation tooi for the
Comprehensive Plan Urban category Offices are permitted in the Urban Residential 22 (UR 22) zone in
order to provide some of the service needs generated by high-intensity land uses The Urban Residential
22 (UR-22) zone is intended primarily for multiple family dwellings and is usually located adjacent to major
or secondary arterials The proposed site is located directly adJacent to local access streets however
Pines Road and Mission Avenue are located within 400 feet of the site and are both designated as Principal
Arterials
Existing zoning in the general area of the proposal is Urban Residential 3 5(UR-3 5) Urban Residential 22
(UR-22) Neighborhood Business (B 1) Regional Business (B-3) Urban Residential 22 (UR 22) is the
predominant zoning found in the area The properties adJacent to the site are zoned Urban Residential 22
(UR 22) and Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) There has been a number of changes in the area over the last
fifteen years The most evident change is in the number of zone reclassifications to allow for medical
facilities and offices A zone reciassification ZE 42 85 from Agricultural Suburban (AS) to Residential
Office (RO) on twenty acres directly east of the site was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in
1985 for additions to the existing Valley Medical Center a medical office building and convalescent home
ZE 61 97
Staff Report May 6 1998 Heanng
4 of 6
0
uilding with a building footpnnt of 10 000
40k
The site plan of record illustrates a single story medi~ca
A
square feet and associated parking and landscaprng The site plan illustrates a six (6) foot sight obscuring
fence along the west property line as required by the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR 22) zone In
addition to the six (6) foot site obscunng fence along the west property line the site pian iIlustrates a building
setback of 40 feet thereby adding an additional buffer between the use and adjacent single family homes to
the west The site plan also illustrates 71 parking stalls which is in excess of the requirements of Chapter
14 802 040 of the Zoning Code The site plan of record illustrates three (3) access points to the site one
located on each of the three adjacent roadways
Prooosed Use Medical Office Building
59 Medical Offices
9 Professional Offices
Total BuildinQ Area 19 000 square feet
13150 square feet Office use
5850 square feet - Storage
Buildina CoveraQe 15 77%
BuildinQ Setbacks Proposed ReQUired
Front Yard (Houk Street) 100+ feet 55 feet
Flanking Yard (Maxwell Ave ) 60+ feet 55 feet
Flanking Yard (Sinto Ave ) 100+ feet 55 feet
Side Yard (west) 40 feet 5 feet/story
Landscapinq Proposed ReQuired
Along Sinto Ave 3 Type I 20 Type III
Along Maxweil Ave 3 Type I 20 Type Iil
Along Houk Street 3 Type I 20 Type III
West property line None 20 Type I
The site plan of record illustrates general compiiance with the development standards of the proposed
Urban Residential 22 (UR-22) zone with the exception of required landscaping Section 14 806 040(2a) of
the Zoning Code requires 20 feet of landscaping around the entire perimeter of the site however the site
plan of record illustrates only 3 feet adjacent to roadways and no landscaping adjacent to the west property
line The applicant has not requested a vanance from the landscaping requirements of the Zoning Code and
prior to the issuance of building permits the site plan of record will need to illustrate compliance with the
landscaping requirements of Section 14 806 040 The site plan of record is general in nature and detailed
review to determine compiiance with all development standards of the proposed Urban Residential 22 (UR
22) zone and conditions of approval is recommended to be admmistrative and to occur prior to the issuance
of building permits
Affected agencies were notified of the proposal and the standard comments for this type of proposal were
received with the exception of comments form the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) A letter from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) was received on
April 22 1998 requesting that the following be imposed as a condition of approval
The projecr sponsor (applicant) shall confnbute a sum of $4 287 89 to WSDOT for the traffi-c impacts
associated with the development of a 93 600 square foot medical office building which is tied to the above
rezone request This mitigation agreement shall conform to the provisions of voluntary agreemenfs as
outlrned rn RCW 82 02
ZE 61 97
Staff Report May 6 1998 Hearing
5of6
0
Staff Recommendation
The Division of Building and Planning recommends approval of the proposed zone reclassification as
conditioned
Attachments
A Maps
e Vicinity Map
o Site Development Plan
e Comprehensive Plan
a Zoning
B Agency and Public Comments
C Conditions of Approval
ZE 61 97
Staff Report May 6 1998 Hearing
6 of 6
`
i °
I ~
/l U~n , fr
I
f
f
I
I
~
I
A7TpACHMENTA3
fl'l1AF*-S
Y
V{'C~ ~~TYMAW
SiYelPIPLaN ~
~
Connm,EI-E~uS~vr= ~,PkAN
ZQNING
i
!
~
~
IVm 11~ ^ w
Y ~
rA t-i` O . ..--7-~•,~,~-~'r..r,r~:..~. + ' . -
~
E i9E5 a
~ ,,,u,,e.,_,•_, - ~ _ v
~ WC4r+£.~ 4
O~4 _ - 1
AT
J,,
1 A 2 .C ~ 1
■ ii
N1 -t
E 1
$aoN~ .c D
G
' ~ ~T AL 0 '
v£
b '
J ~,1 ~ . r ,
~A-TA-~~0
r
~ w
P.v
~L
~
KQ
' f ~ ya r , ~ < ,,,•~f A .
~
a - a~, . '`r ~
1 `i G a.s.' 'i r' ~ '
~ ~ y£RS►o~ , ,
I~t Z
v~CINl TY
~
~
°
5t519$
Not to Scale
1
0.
Qc
G
Z
. Q,
, J
a
ioN r-
~F C, i JNro~ un „ UR 3 5 z
no~nG~~tr ~ raop09 a~e Ur+» rnLLi ~
G) 473 0 6 AGR~~~ ty
ED Iit!
psarcn
, 5F N~LC 0
~
tOr+elOQ~ ~4C+ aFzEp p~rU~ i
t~ 1nCq
1 ADIAGL1 !9 m ~ 3~'~i 51 or w
~.r- pROf'E 5 W e 6 ~ P`~re i ~uK G - 4 OLDG AlRCA e~Om
x,riC~O uR x m~upg W/ iYPE ~FO OA~ 7
~ ~0 ~t~ i h~0 GP U.I
C
DL~ CA ~ Af2C~' fi aG6 WllnlC ~ f~.8 PlA u iCL O
TY~ a' ~AN~'~nPC ~O 0 M 5p~~~ ~ ~ ' ~
9%.0r- UDL torp0o 10 9ypPC D ~
31 mnoad 3 c51 o~ I
~~Q~ TOIAt ,
;11DE IL! S7PH ~ I
pppvtdEO A51
E tExCL PAVflO A~O~ '~~g~ ~
6PAC ~
G 0~` ~EN
paaF K,OET~At GG7A, gvML BKtN~ I AOJAG~~ tpp Y It
1. r p' p ~R 22
~1.. t6pU.5 75 ~j
i v A lLBY H40 ~ E S! 7 DLP~ 5g ` N ~ Il
~yEDIC "L ~ FR'0,11 (NOR urgt y 15
~D(UR~Epyil
bOJAG ~iT I 1 1~ t • $R ~ ' ~ tn .Y~_. 1 ~ 41 I ,L1~✓ I~T _
~eo
P ~C,~MtiRS A OLCG 9P~e ~A co
~ P
«m,U, o~
6,
~ ~ 6I co
70
~
~A AGF-,AI o
aw~ur j LInE 1,1F 323
~ L~R LevCL SPGr~E Ia07
I
f5f9°11 A96
~
b 4 UR ~ r~MGp r~r
~ a1 ,~ST 5 U11Jt C I S~ 1 ~
740 I ~
~ PfROP LINC to aW
a 1 oao r ~ ..,a~,.L- 1 L,II
~ c00 ~Qt]
y evt s~-t i~lx u
,o~~ ~
~ r p,s I -1-' ~ I pt7111tC41 N
tYPE ~ ~ _ ~ itA 5ni'Rittto ~
1~
~c?`t'A) a ~i- wDC Wr
~ ~ ubtt ~
1 )01
p 13)7 nc- ~ ~n~ ~rt L 0
APFOPCRSY
F~ d 1 _5 i'. ra
-~-1qa. ERpI. ala tC) S~ I L
"
pF ~~CO~fl
, (D
~ ~
,
,
~ Land Us~
,
o~1_ ~ _ entw
~
~
~ - ac o o
~ c,LE~
40
_ ~ -
t 1 1 1 ~ ■
'w..
~
~S.
1
.
1 ~
't ~ ~ ~
0 ~
' ' ~ ' 3 ~
~15SlO
' •
O G
~ .
✓
t ° ~ ~ ~67
' y
~
1
ell o o ell
,
a
. .
t 4 VIF~'~ - - ~ ~
~
~ - HENS~VE P~~'N ~p►P
~ CD~pRE
N°
51619$
Not to gcale
s
=61 =97 '
Existing Zoning
,
. ee~.
IJR-22
f B-Z 3 0258
- 3 0220 ~~,.;~a
f. Gx -c S.: ~ 3,
; ~~"J ~ cC t, r'•z,~'~,~~ ~ r
~)~,N .-r{~.j.N
~ ` y~~ ~/~~]3
w x
~ •Z
~
1 /f~ls~~~'L'~RI~~~
. i' - t
4. ~ -Mn ~^^.rrr t-~~-..v ro. ~ -r' ^,s C"'r £
4
~N
'}A-,.,f"~iC~~~~ r
0415
- B-3 7`
~8;~~ s 0 0711 ~i r ~C
1`~ a~ ~ t F - 2~0~
,
. ~ ; ~~1..;, - 9955
cc~ ;^''11 r04 33 i- ~ 07042 0703~Q CTO2Q O T O t
~ M
~~OT0~
o
I 0173 k t~- 1 0434 0712 2
01 25 ~ l J ~ - ~ T 441' 2 71
. _ .
- Maxwe ~
2 0e12 ~z 0e10 M'ssio q
so
01~ p' 3 I 2 oeo 23
I i 0174 B-1 S~4 81C 99 3 55
m ~n om m , •
m, 2 0815 080 08
6-117-PA78C L
~
~ ao 0
48 W 2 oao T ,
1 0334 2 0 8
~
S~nto
2 c
~
1 0792
B-2 j w 2 0901
UR-34 99 55
s 1 0785
2 0912
2 0903
I 0784 al 070• $-1 V 59 #-1 ~2
I nm t „t% n
Not to Scale 03118/98 N' ZONING MAP
~
I
Aft AOi i NiENT
AGENCYANDPU~'iC CQ,MIIAENT'
S
t
OFFICE OF THE SPOk:.ANE COUNTY ENGNEER
1026 bV Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260 0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZOi~tES
TO Spokane County Bwlding and Plannilg Dep e -
FRO1~1 Division of EnQineennQ & Roads 1 ~
DATE Apnl 16, 1998
PROJECT UR-3 5& UR-22 TO UR-22
FILE # ZE-0061-97 / )
Heanng Date 05/06/1998 @ 1 30 3#
Review Date
SponsorlApplicant TANN-Y-JONES Yj l,,,e, Po,/- -S Wo
Section To~vnship Range 15-25 44
Planner TAM1V1Y JONES
TechrucaUReview Date (0 1/15/1998 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Ei3~ineenng Department has revie~ved the above referenced applicahon The followin~
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Plannung Department for inclusion in the
"Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road SysLem shall be
obtained irom the County Engineer
2 Appllcant snall submit for acceptance by the Spokane Coun-c_y Engineer
sidewalk, drainage and access plans
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submittea ana
approved by the Spokane County Englnezr The design, location ana
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance wi-ch stGndard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by thz County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect whlch is Zo be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 The construcLion of the roadwav improvements stated herein shall be-
accomplishec as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
5 Roaci impro vements and curb were installed on MaxTvell rivenue, Sin -co
Avenue and Nouk Road per RID A419 Przor to the release o= G building
permit sia~walk shall be constructed along Maxwzll 2venu2, Si nto
Avenue Gnd I-ouk Road
CC Applicant D IIGriT J HUt4:: (MA.<dELL & SIPITO LLC)
Engireer/Surve/o~
Planzey T.,I4f1z JO~j::S
l
Page 2 of 2
O1/15/1998
ZE 0061 97
6 All required improvements snall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management ln effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage p1an
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
8 No construction work is to be pzrformed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permlt has been issued by the County Engineer F11
work within the pu.olic road rlght oi way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer
9 All required constructlon within the existing or proposed publlc right
of way is to be completed prior to the releas~e of a bullding permit or
a bond in an Gmount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
10 The appl?cant shall grant appllcGble boraer easements adjacent to
Spokane Courty Right of Way per Spokane County Standards
7
rNtCcrffner t s
To TANIlMY JONES
CC K2Vli1 CCOkc
From Jlm Red/Spo'Aane County Utilitles
Date I/12/98
Slib~ ect MAXlrIELL & SINTO
A wet (litie) sewer connect-Lan to the arPa-wide Public Sewer Sy
stem 15 to I-Ne corstructed Sewer conneactlon
permlt ls re-quired
Appllcant shall submit e,,gressly tc Spokan2 County Utllities G
epartment "Linder separate cov2r", only thos2
plan sheets showing sewer plans and spec-Lflcatlons fcr the pub
' llc sewer connections and facllitles for revlew
and apprcval
The plans snall be submitted przor to th2 lssuance of tne sewe
r connection permit
P rrangements for payments of applzcable spwer charges must be
made for prlcr to lssuance- of sew°r connectlon
pe rmlt
Any water service for this project shall be provid2d in accord
ance wlth the Cocrdinated WateL System Plar for
Spol,a,ie Cotlnty, as amendec-l-
Page 1
~
SPOKANE COUMTY HEALTH DlS7RICT
CONDlTlOINS
a Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utlhties, Spokane County
b Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utlhties, Spokane County
c Water servlce shall be by an existing pubhc water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
d A pubLc sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be
provided to each busldsng
e Use of private wells and water systems is prolubited
e
5094596828 SCAPCA 490 P05 APR 21 98 14 33
~
SPOKANE COUNT~
~ ~UARe AIR POlltMON
s~ O K COiif~OL AUTHORITY
WEST 1101 [OILEGE SUIYE 403 o SPOK4NE WA 99201 0(509) 456-4727 Fax (509) 459-6828
Dates Aprs9 21, 1998
T0 Ms Tammy Jones
Spokane Couniy D0vasaon of Bualdengs & Planning
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260
FrOm MP ChaPleS E Stu~er
Re SCAPCA REQU'REMENTS FOR
F10e NO ZE-61o97
Proponent Medocal Offace Bu'Idong @ 1409 N H0uk9 12422 E
Maxwell etc.
Date Received 4/13/98
fComments on DetePmsnatoon of Nons➢gnaficarace issued ora 4110/98)
The Spokane County Air Pollution Contro/ AuPhonPy (SCAPCA) was formed under the authonty of the 1967 Clean
Arr Act of Washington (RCVI9 That Act reqwred counties like Spokane County to acbvate local air pollution control
agencies To meet the requirements of that Act SCAPCA adopted regulations fo contrvl the emissions of arr
contaminanPs from sources withln Spokane Counfy
Portrons of Spokane Counfy fail to meet federal health sfandarris for particulate emissions (dust and smoke) and
carbon monoxide Numerous sfrategies have been implemented to reduce arr pollution emissions so that we can
improve arr quallty and meef hea/th standards
Followmg is a list of concemshissues rhat at a mm,mcrm need to be addressed for proposed profects Addifional
comments may result affer more detailed mformabon of the pro/ect is supplied SCAPCA encourages proponenPs
fo contacr their offices at 1101 West College Spokane WA 99201 far additional rnformabon
SCAPCA has reviewed the Determination of Nonsigrnficance and environmental checklist for this project
and feels that the environmental checklist is lacking in the foliowing sections
A 10 A Notice of Construction (air pollution permit) from SCAPCA is requcred for any air pollution
sources Before any business is established at the site SCAPCA should be contacted to determine if a
iVotice of Construction is required
WASH1NGTON Sl'ATE REGUL.AT10N 173-400-110 REQUIRES THAT A NOTICE OF
CONSTRUCTION AIdD APPLICAYION FOR APPROVAL BE SUBMpTTED TO AND APPROVED BY
31CommentslSEPA%2E-6»l' acc
iVledieal Office Building @ 1409 N Houk, 92422 E Maxwell
etc
April 21, 1998
Page 1
; Pnnted on Roo<lad PaOqr
r
5094596828 SCAPCA 490 P06 APR 21 98 14 34
~
OIJFt AGElVCY PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION, 1MSTALLATION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AIFt
PQLLUTION SOURCE
SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV requires regis4ration with this agency for all air poliution source 4hat
have been or are proposed to be established at the site An approved Notice of Construction suffices to
meet this requiremen4
SCAPCA Regulation I Article VI and SCAPCA Regulation II Article IV, address air pollution emission
s4andards All emission standards must be met
An asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA certified inspector prior to demolition or renovation of
building(s), to de4ermine rf asbestos-containin9 matenal is present at the site Demolition and renovation
projec#s must comply with the requiremenfis of CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart M SCAPCA Regulation 1
Article IX & Article X Section 10 09 and Washington State Regulations (WAC 296-62 -65, & -155)
Notice of Intent to Perform Asbestos Removal and/or Demolition forms are available at the SCAPCA
office Asbestos-containing matenal must be removed in accordance with Federat State, Locai
regula4ions and disposed of at a licensed facildy
Upon reviewing the proposed project SCAPCA has determined that an air Qollution source may be
established at the site Based on the information provided the following air pollufiion sources may be
present at the proposed si4e
a One or more Ins4rument Steriliter Units
0 One or more fossii fuel (natural gas propane butane diesel, fuel oil or waste oil) or wood
burnir~g heat sources Natural gas/propane/butane burning boilers, heating units or hot
water heaters, or combmations thereof with a total heat input of 4,000 000 BTUs/hr are
required fio apply for a Notice of Construction Other units are required 4o apply for a NOC
when the total heat mput exceeds 400 000 BTUs/hr In addition addit,onal requirements
such as controls for iVitrogen Oxide emissions (NOx) and source testing may be required
depending upon 4he size of the unit
B 2 a Botlers naturai gas burrnng heating units are expected to be included in each of the buildmgs
Other toxic and nontoxic air pollutants will most likely occur in future tenant s manufactunng and
mdustria) processes and shouid be mentioned here
B 2 c A rnention should be made that toxic and nontoxic air pollutants will be controlled to the levef
specifed by Spokane County A,r Pollution Control Authonty
Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions dunng demolition construction and excavation
projects be controlied This may require the use of water sprays tarps spnnklers or suspension of
activity dunng certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer
of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activitres
SCAPCA strongly recommends #hat all traveled surfaces (i e ingress egress parking araas, access
roads) should be paved and kept clean to minimize emissions
Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved
surfaces If tracking or spilJs occur on paved surfaces measures must be taken immediately to clean
these surfaces
Debris generated as a result of 4his project must be disposed of by means other than buming (i e
construc4ion waste vegetatNe waste etc )
RAedecal Office Building @ 1409 Id Houk 12422 EMaxwell
etc
Apr0121 1998
Page 2
e
5094596828 SCAPCA 490 P07 APR 21 96 14 34
An asbestos survey must be done if existing structures are to be demolished, to determine rf matenal
con4aining asbestos is present at the site Demolition and renovation projec4s must compiy with the
requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M and SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IX Intent to Demolish
forms are available at the SCAPCA office Asbestos containing matenal must be taken to a licensed
facility
B 7 a Many instrument stenlizer urnts use toxic chemicals such as ethy(ene oxide, during the
sterilizing cycle
B 7 a('8 ) A4 a minimum fire department and hazardous response tearns may be needed at the site
B15 a The fire department and hazardous response team should be included in the list of public
services
A COPY OF THIS LETTER SHOULD BE PR01lIDED TO ANV POSSIBLE TENANT TO r41D
THEM 9N MAKING DECISIONS STATE AND LOCAL LAWS STATE TI-1A1° IT 1S dJNLAlIiFUL
7'O IiVS'YALL AN AlR POLL.UTION SOURCE 1fVIT'HOUT AN APPROilED NOTICE OF
CONSTRUCTION FROM SCAPCA
If the proponent or anyone else has questions concerning the above please contact Charles E Studer
(509) 456-4727 ext 107 April Miller ext 105 or Kelle Vigeland ext 106 at SCAPCA's office dunng the
hours of 8 00 am & 4 30 prn, Monday through Friday
FaPAure to rneet SCAPCA reau/atrons rnaV result Bn c/e0aVs, closure and crvol andlor
cnm►nal sanctions
cc.EAN AIR ,s uP ro ~LL oF us
Rfledical Office Building @ 1408 N Houbc, 12422 E iViaxwell
ete
Apnl 21, 1998
Page 3
J
t
" WaShAngtpg9 State Eastern Region
Depaptment of Transportat0on 2714 N Mayfair Street
Spokane WA 99207 2090
Sid Morrison
Secretary of Transportation (509) 324 6000
RECEIVED
Apn122 1998 SPOONE COUNT1f
APR 2 4 1998
Ms Tammy Jones oivISION oF BUILDING AN9 PLAPdNIPG
Spokane County Building and Planrung SY
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane WA 99260
RE SR 27 Medical Office Proposal
Dear Ms Jones
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has met with the applicant
regarding the above rezone request and has reached agreement regarding the necessary
rrutigating rneasures Based on the outcome of prior traffic studies in this area the project
sponsor has agreed to pay a proportionate share to WSDOT for improvements at the I-
90/Pines interchange and the Pines and IVLssion intersection This ls based on a$181 per tnp
fee that has been estabLshed as a fair share pro-rata amount through other developments in
thls same area Due to the proximity of this development it would be reasonable, in absence
of a site specific detailed traffic study to apply the same $181 per trip fee to ttus development
proposal As a result we would ask that the following be imposed upon this development as
a condition of approval
o The project sponsor (applicant) shall contribute a sum of $4 287 89 to WSDOT for the
traffic impacts associated with the development of a 13 600 square foot medical office
building which is tled to the above rezone request This payment to WSDOT shall be due
pnor to the release of any building pernuts This rrutigation agreement shall conform to
the provisions of voluntary agreements as outlined in RCW 82 02
See the attached letter and memorandum for further explanation of this agreement
~
Ms Jones
Apri122 1998
Page 2 --f
If you should have any questions regarding the above comments contact Grea Figg in our
Regional Planning Office at (509) 324-6199
Sincerely
KEITH MARTIN
Development Services Engineer
By Greg Figg
Transportation Planner
MA/GF
attach
cc Dwight Hume Applicant's Representative
Pat Harper Spokane County Engineers
Project File 027-086-20
1
a} r
~
Am6racs, MEtvT ~
-,CO_ND]TIONStOFARPR(DVAL
- _ . _ _ - - -
- - - - - - -
RGCOMOm11GNDED CONDIT1ONS OF i
~
1 ~ dF`OPPROV/`iiL FOR ZE°61°97
~o
- ~
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
SPOK:ANM COUNn
1 All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the 'Applicant" which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property heirs assigns and successors
2 The zone change applies to the following real property Lots 1-3 Block 2 Mission View
Addition as recorded in Book T of piats page 27 Records of Spokane County
Washington
3 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) and the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overiay zone(s) of the Spokane County Zoning Code as amended
4 The applicant shall develop the subject property generaliy in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner Variations when approved by the Director of the
Division of Building and Planning/designee may be permitted including but not limited to
building location landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone Ali
variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code and
the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained
5 Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee of
a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permit
6 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
7 A specific landscape plan planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be
submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to
release of any building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that
sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired
8 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Titie Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of specral
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall
serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The
Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and
shall oniy be released in full or in part by the Division of Building and Planning The Title
Notice shall generaiiy provide as follows
ZE 61 97 MAY 6 1998 Public Heanng
Division of Building and Pianning Recommended Conditions of Approval
The parcel of property legally described as Lots 1-3, Block 2, Mission View Addition
as recorded in Book "T" of plats, page 27 Records of Spokane County,
UVashington is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing
Examiner on May 6, 'i 998, imposing a variety of special development conditions
File No ZE-61-97 is available for onspection and copying in the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning
.
ZE 61 97 MAY 6 1998 Public Heanng
Division of Building and Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
~
~
~
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOK;ANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CON➢)ITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONES
_
TO Spokane Colmty Bu.ilding and PlanniDep e ~
,
FROM Divlsion of Engmeering & Roads /
DATE Apn116, 1998
PItO.TEC'T IJIt-3 5& UR-22 'I'O iTR-22
FILE # ZE-0061-97 / )
Heanng Date 05/06/1998 @ 1 30 3#
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant TAMMY JONES
Section Townslup Range 15-25-44
Planner TAMMY JONES
TechrucaUReview Date (01/15/1998 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced apphcation The followmg
"Condltions of Approval" are subrYUtted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
"Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of propep-ty as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer
sidewalk, drainage and access plans
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the proDect which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 The construction of the roadway improvements stated hereln shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
5 Road improvements and curb were installed on Maxwell Avenue, Sinto
Avenue and Houk Road per RID #419 Prior to the release of a building
permit sidewalk shall be constructed along Maxwell Avenue, Sinto
Avenue and Houk Road
CC AppllCant DWIGHT J HUME (MAXWELL & SINTO LLC)
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
~
~
• Page 2 of 2
O1/15/1998
ZE 0061 97
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Speciflcations for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
8 No constructlon work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Englneer All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspectlon and
approval by the County Engineer
9 All required construction wlthin the exlsting or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a bullding permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
10 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane Courty Right of Way per Spokane County Standards
~ d 1-
0 0
.
, e e e o~ o
D ' m 0 0 0 o
,
ec%
To Tammy Jones 1 ~
/
From Scott Engelhard Sul(.,
Subject ZE 61 97 Traffic Distribution
Applicant James Wolff Dwight Hume Agent
Date March 9 1998
We have accepted the distribution study for the above reference proJect The application is now considered
technically complete and may be scheduled for a public hearing
~ ~ . RECEIVED
. ~
MAR 0 3 1998
SPCKANE ppUNTY ENWER
••.~-~Y 4~
S
BUILDING AND PLANNWG • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOT'T, P.E., DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Scott Engelhard
~:F
FROM: Tammy Jones
DATE: March 3, 1998
RE: ZE-61-97
Attached is a copy of the Traffic Distribution submitted March 2, 1998 for ZE-61-97,
Wolff Medical Building. Also attached is a revised copy of the site plan of record.
Please review and submit comments to me by March 17, 1998.
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINCTON 99260
PHO1vE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
TDD: (509) 324-3166
.
. ~ .
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
February 25, 1998
W.O. No. 98318
Scott Englehart
Spokane County Engineers
W. 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Wolff Medical Building Traffic Distri6ution
Dear Scott,
I have been contacted by Jamie Wolff and Dwight Hume, representatives for Maxwell Sinto, L.L.G.,
to perform a brief trip distribution for the potential medical office building site between Maxwell
and Sinto on Houk. As I understand the project, a proposed medical office building is planned for
this 1.46 acre site which consists of four existing parcels, two zoned UR-22 and two zoned UR-3.5.
The lots are in use for four single family residences, have been approved, as a package, for a 28 unit
apartment building, and are now being considered for a medical office building.
The need for this traffic letter is to establish the impact which this rezone and land use will have on
the intersection of Mission & McDonald. Therefore, this study will identify the anticipated traffic
at this intersection based upon the anticipated land use and anticipated trip distribution
characteristics of the site.
Under the proposed rezone and site plan, the trip generation characteristics of the site with the
anticipated square footage of the building and anticipated land uses, are shown on Table 1. The
information on Table 1 is based upon a one story building with a 10,000 square foot footprint and
a full basement. It further assumes that the main floor (10,000 square feet) will be used as medical
office space, and in the basement, 2,000 square feet would be used as general office, 3,000 square
feet for the mechanical space and the remaining 5,000 square feet as storage. The general office
space in the basement is planned to be used as bookkeeping facilities for the medical offices located
on the main floor and possibly for other medical offices in the area. The Trip Generation Manual,
6th Edition (TGM) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers shows the trip generating
characteristics of a medical office building under land use category 720. Based upon the
characteristics of the site and land use as they are known today, the most appropriate independent
variable for trip generating purposes is gross square footage. In the TGM, gross square footage is
described as all of the enclosed square footage. It goes on to say that the net rentable square footage
is 85% to 90% of the gross square footage.
707 West 7ih • Suite 200 2020 Lakewaod Drive • Suite 205
Spokane, WA 99204 Cceur d'Alene, ID 83814
509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277
' . .
. ,
Wolff Medical Building Trip Distribution Letter
February 25, 1998
Page 2
Table 1- Trip Generation Rates and Volumes for the Wolff Medical Building
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
KSF*
Vol @ 2.43 Directional Vol @ Directional
trips per Distribution 3.66 trips Distribution I
ksf 80% In 20% Out Per ksf 27% In 73% Out
20 49 39 10 73 20 5 3
Avera e Dail Tri Ends ADT
KSF Rate Total ADT
20 36.13 723
* KSF - Thousand square feet
Under the proposed zoning and uses for the site, 73 trips in the PM peak hour could be expected to
be generated.
The distribution from the site was estimated based upon a random sample of addresses which was
supplied from the proposed tenant of this rnedical office building. This random sample consisted
of 130 patients. A breakdown of routing to/from the office building, percent of traffic and PM peak
hour traffic volume is shown on Table 2.
Table 2- Generic and PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution from the Wolff Medical Building
Direction Number from Percent from PM Peak Hour Traffic
Sample Sample Volume
NB on Pines 21 16% 12
WB on I-90 31 24% 17
EB on I-90 19 15% 11
,
W of Pines 25 19% 14
E of Pines 31 24% 17
S on Pines 3 2% 2
Total 130 100% 73
' . .
Wolff Medical Building Trip Distribution Letter
February 25, 1998
Page 3
The traffic headed northbound on Pines had addresses in Otis Orchards or off of Argonne north of
Trent. Those located west of Havana were assumed to take I-90 to access the site. Those located
either in Liberty Lake or north Idaho were also assumed to take I-90. Those located west of Pines
and south of I-90 were assumed to use the surface streets to access the site, as were those located east
of Pines and south of I-90. The remaining patients in the survey were located south of the Spokane
Valley in a place where they would use SR 27 (Pines Road) to access the site.
During most of the day, patients will be able to turn left onto Pines Road if their destination is either
south on SR 27 or west of Pines and south of I-90. However, due to queuing from the signal at
Mission & Pines during the PM peak hour, this movement is not available. Those patients and staff
accessing the transportation system during this time frame will most likely travel north on Houk, turn
left on Mission and then either turn left onto Pines or continue west on Mission. This left turning
movement onto Mission can be easily made. Regardless of how these trips access the transportation
system, they are travelling away from the intersection of Mission & McDonald. Since the focus of
County staff's concern is the intersection of Mission & McDonald, added traffic volumes to this
intersection is the ultimate concern of this trip distribution analysis.
The traffic expected to travel through the Mission & McDonald intersection is the 24% with
destinations south of I-90 and east of Pines Road. Based upon the traffic volumes projected for this
site, the additional traffic through the Mission & McDonald intersection during the PM peak hour
is 17 vehicles, 5 travelling toward the site and 12 travelling away from the site.
Traffic volumes counted at the intersection of Mission & McDonald in 1995 showed 1,182 vehicles
travelling through the intersection during the PM peak hour. Traffic counts in 1998 are anticipated
to be somewhat higher. The anticipated increase of 17 vehicles, on the 1995 volumes is 1.44% and
will be a lesser percentage with the higher 1998 traffic volumes. This increase in traffic will not be
noticeable.
Therefore, based upon the trip generation and trip distribution characteristics of the proposed use and
site plan of this proposal, the rezoning the site will add very little traffic to the transportation system,
particularly the intersection of Mission & McDonald. This small amount of traffic will be almost
unnoticeable, will not generate a need for mitigation, and therefore, further study of the traffic
generated by this proposal is not necessary.
.
' . .
v
Wolff Medical Building Trip Distribution Letter
February 25, 1998
Page 4
Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. If you need any additional information
on this issue, please let me know.
Sincerely, C ) ~ oF w'~s~,
Q- • ~
°x.
Ann L. Winkler, P.E.
31398
AL W/alw
NA1- ti~G
cc: John Pederson, Spokane County Planning
Jamie Wolff, Managing Member, Maxwell Sinto, L.L.C. EXPIRES 5/1 /0~q ~
Dwight Hume, Land Use Consultant
file
V C
~
ki -
' 0 0 • 0 0 0
~0 9 e o e Q
o D 0 A 0 0 e
-
1 ~42rv ~,I
11' I
To Tammy Jones ~
~
From Scott Engelhard
Subject ZE 61 97 Traffic Distnbution
App(icant James Wolff Dwight Hume Agent
Date March 9 1998
We have accepted the distribution study for the above reference proJect The application is now considered
technically complete and may be scheduled for a public hearing
` - - - -I ~ I
f
I ( t 1 ~
Qev~ons ~ eY
~ ~4DJl~GENT r4DJ T aCEN P~PERTY PR4PERTY
ZONED UR-3.5 ZON~D UR-22 ~ L I
~ , ~ ~ ~ v~-~ ~EDtE~L USEy - 1 EXf5tI~1C~ ZpN~ !~R-2Z ~ UR-3'
2~ Q~' 3-P~ WIQE W/ TYPE f 22 4 UR-3.5 1 a-n r w i I I
7 PRC)POSED ZQNE UR-~a f A1.LI L~NDSGdPII~'s ~t-~~
~ Ya~ 3~01' Af~,4 63 413 (146 A 1 , , I .23 (14ro ACRES) ~
- - - - - - '1'sfJ.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' _ _ ~ ~ i , BLDCs ARE,4 10~00 SF l5 , ~ ~ , 00 SF (S[N~sl =E A
~ St~RY w/ Dd' ~ ~ ~ RY w/ D,4`r'LICx14t
~ ~ , , BASEM~NT r ~ ~ ~ ,E1'1ENT z
~ I ~ i N u. ~ BLDG GOVEt~CxE Im,000/h3423 - - _ ~ 00163423 = 15 11% <
~ 6 LAND5C,4PE A~Q f INCL SWAL~St 19 00 SF ~ ~ I ?>O sP J
~ , ~ TYPE ~ LANDSGAPE f~ D lS A , i ~ REC~ EE PL N)
~ i ~ DAYL IC~Nt BAgEMENt- ; ~ i 8 SLDCs U5E MEp f G ~ I _ , a~r~ac „ ~ . I : PLAN) (L
CsARDEi~ CC~l,lRT ~i ~ ST , / ~ ~ 0 ORAC~E ~ • / - ~~L~ I ►IGALlFIRC3F OFFIGE w '4RAGE
i f / ~ ` i 4~«~~sm~ J - 3-m" IDE U./ TYPE ~~I,~ 9 REQ D Paf~:iNCs 10000/i10= 5
' ~ ~ ?ONED UR 35 ~ + \ I f ~ i LaND APfNCs 3150/3~~= 9( ~ / , T~ a.~~ •
/ / . , , ~ ~ ~ / i u, , 585~/200~= r , ,~r ~ ; M,4< < ~
L~ / • , LEYEL ENTRY f i,~ f, , Q ll PA'RKS TOT ~ - ~ i /r ~ r r f~ ~
r , , w~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ADJ,4CENT ~ r ~ 1 Q I ~ u,, ,n ~ 0 P~C NCs PROVID~D ~1 f_ -
~ ~ / lL - ,/r/~ - • ~ ~ , P PERTY t ~ ~I . ~i/ !j~ / - - - - L7~~~ 1 : ~ j~ ~ . I ( / / % II , ~ f~' A I ZON D UR-22 4~ 4PEN SPACE ~EXGL PAYED ~4REA51 ADJACENT a ~ 'i ~ f 1 '
.f a , ~ ~ i I,/ ~ ~ r~ ~ (YALL~Y ~145PItA~.I 19600/63423= PROPERtY , i ~ ~ , Q
~r , ~ ~ ~ ;;G , i / ~//r. ~ 4------- z ~ MEDIC,4L C~FICE51 ZONED UR-35 s ~ w~ r . ~ - 12 B~DC~ SEt , ~ , ~ ~ , , D BA~fCS ►A M.rT/f~/A ^f t~! t I1~ 1
i ~ i` , I i Q 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ; ,f ~ ~ ' ~ F~ONT fNOi~TH d S4UTNJ Z5 _ r j - - -
~~i r - e m~ , ~ / ~ / > > ~ I 6~ , i ~ 5 DE lUfi~ 35 ~ ll1EST1 5
~ . ~ / ~ ~ 20 ~z - o J r ~LANKI~Cx IE~IST} 25 i ~ ~ , ~ 0i 1 i
m ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ I / , ~ Y . / I ~i P- r~ i 0 , ~ / r, ~ / / , / / ~ ,n ~ n
~ , r / ~i'/ ~ /I i ~ 1 . ~/,~r~~ ~ I ~ I l.i ~ ~ t~a ~ ' , ~ ~r:~/7'~
~ i r ~ r 20 ~ i ~02 2 t ~ ~ ~ 1~ : JJ~ 1/j/~ f f, I / - 1
~ f ~I r1~4xWELL S~Nr ~ , r ~ I 4 1..L C . ! . ~ r~ ; ~:i% i ~'r" i ~ LOWER LEY'EL ~NTC~2Y , /1 j G/O JAME5 A II~LF~ M,4N,4GINC: MEMBER
r~r ; ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' j 0 140~ US BdNK SLD~ SPOKANE WA ~
M , . a5i5~~a~t (509) ~24-2l61 ~
~ 6'-~~~ I-I $ICsNT ~ fi ' I ZohlED UR 35 0 i ~ ~ ~ I ~ , i Q oescuR~r~ ~~vcE ~
~ _ _ ~ _ i P~fi . - - - ~ ~ coNt u~sr ~
, ~o i ~ P L NE ~ I ' DW Cs J IaUME
~ ~ 1~4 ~ I ~ ~ 10~ 5 I-I~UARD St~ 325 i ~ .
I PARC~L ° ~,4~G m`~ ~ SPOIG4NE l1~JA ~ ~
a~~2m~ 451~2~803 P,a~ (509) 4~b-~1402 xor~o ~ zz zc~ uR a~ roT~u.
I ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ , i , ~ ~ 5 -U ~ ~ r - m ~ ~ ~
SIDE ~ I t~ -t,~-~' - _ h > ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
Y,4Rp . ~ - - - o ~ I In I~I ~ z ~ ~ ~ - S~~EC'g' SgTE ~ I - 1- F ~ ~ - n-~
p ~ ~ ~ X ~asF~c Ho { ~8 DRAII~AGE SIUALE i ~ 9~ G - _ ~ ~ ;u _ ~ T
i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ o ~ ~
- - - - - - 220$~ ~ u- , ~ , r ~ , ~ y
I II 1 I 3-0" WIDE W/ T1'PE "I" I ~ - .
NDSCAPINC~ - _ ~ ; O ~ ~ ~ 13 32 - , 1332 _ 141~ d ~ - ~ . , •
i 'I f r~ W
~ r~-~/ ~ s ~ °~1 ' aDJAC~NT ~ " o s~ ~a'-
~ t • oo I S ( ~ ~ ~ Pf~OPERtY ~o - - - '~'Q 1 I.~ - ~J
ZONED UR-35 ~ W W w ~ ~ Q~ir~ ~ 9=!'~ -QD o 6 E o F' Z- E
~ m m ~ (~l1NERdL ~-#OME) u - ~ ~~T~F' _ > ~ ~
~ I, F
III
~ WA fie W` ~-W-,A I i = cty Zoo Bernard Qaw
Arcnltt to. P C 8l 1 9
Aa 6tt 1a ~ '4T
' - -
a~ ~
01/16/1998 09 18 1-509-4 357 DWIGHT J HUME PAGE 01
~ • !
~
IFAX Mi'VEMORANDUM
Dwmht J Hume
I.md Us,~ gmmg Consialtant
3mte #325, S 107 I3owar+d St.
Spokane, Wa. 99201
456-7402 (V) 456-7357 (FAX)
To e Scott EnglehaW
Fromo Dvonght J Hume
Dateo 1-16-98
Fax Numbero 456-4715
Subjecto Houk & Smto Distabution Study (ZE-61-97)
Number ~~geso 1
Ifthere ts a probkm canammg ah,s FAx, pkase call 1-509456-7402
Boy when you "engDe" yoa~ engle hard, don't yoea Scoet,7 Ju~t kiddmgi
Some more ponnts to ponder
1'he existing land use of 2 sJf wuts and the appaoved 28 a~artment
units genemte 168 vtd (28 x 6) +(2 x 10) = 168
The siu ftnn whach vve am mov'ng uses thc same tnp datribaation as
our psoposed use since ¢hcy are essentially side by sace land uses on the
samc stmt
'I'he proposed sflte plan provides two pomts of ~gms (Smto and
Maxwe1D whicb dmt traffic to the intcfsection off those §treets with Pn.nes)
Whereas, the exmtmg o$g'ice sate egresses to Houk and then Houk to
Missaon
Thc P M peak is only one hour from 4-5 rather than 4-6 and not on
Fndays or Satuadays when th~ tmffic flow is Smatest and it is only 21 69
probable tnps to 1-90 dunng the P M peak mchadwg the balance of the
space ae normal fl`I°E ~gures (See 12-15-971etter to Greg Sauth)
81/16/1998 09 18 1-509-t 357 DWIGHT J HUME PAGE 02
!
Englebud ZE-M1097
Page 2
The ianpact of tnps ftm the space vacatted by our tenant sbould not
be calculated m as that complex is exismg ammd gmdfathered mto the
tra~c systeffi
Ouar relocaUon adjacent t~ ~ existing facihty is an anvmaly to the
sc~nano of nea► land use paoposals Normally, an unspecif ed use Ls beAng
introduced to the neighba►rhood as ncw traffic Sunply put~ we're not
ieavmg aad yet the 6stribution improves due to the access points onto ¢hree
streets rather than one
If one could esumte t~ distnbution, ~t would be reasonable to
assumt that 50~ ~f the traffac would leave ont~ ~~xwefll or 3amw rather
$bm Houk VlhCreas 100% flS o18to HOl&k ag dus tlffiC
When we ftt met ~g about the need ffor a study9 he agreed
that the mterc~e was studiod to death and he only needed to determac
the number of tnps to the anterchange He agreed to rtm ehc I°M numbers
and ggvc us a distnbuUon percentage based ugon reccnt woi°k done on Mc
Propertes rezone neu dns site He thcn took that perc~~~e figure and
plugged at into Ins other k~own fict of what was clasrged for an apartment
pw,gect Finally, hc gawe us an opportumtjr Uo rcvLse thc~ 4umben based
upon actual data4 which you ate now pnvy to
Iil o ,we asked if there wasn°t ~naggh kaown data ta avoid
anotheg expenn of `°sayi$g at sgam'° In dus anstqpce, we were blossed wflth
enough data to do so I thereforc see dus as an aq1omaty ratbor than a
ptecedenoe for the fiittre
'
~
i
i 6 0 . 0 _ A
0 0 0 • o - ~ x i
r t
~ _ - - - - ~ .
u
To Spokane County Buiiding and Planning
Planner Td4MMY .lONES ~
From Scott Engelhard Transportation Engineering SP & DES Coordinator
Subject ZE-0061-97 UR-3 5& UR-22 TO UR 22
Technical Review Date 01115/1998@ 1 15
App0ocant DWIGHT J HUME (MAXWELL & SINTO LLC)
Date January 15 1998
6tE Technical Review
After review of ZE 0061 97 UR 3 5 & UR 22 TO UR 22 Spokane County Transportation
Engineering Section is requesting additional traffic information
Once a determination of Counter Complete status by the Planning Department has been made
please suspend the Technical Completeness Review for this project until such time as additional
mformation is submitted and reviewed
The requested information is a traffic distribution study scoped by Spokane County Engineers
Subsequent review of the distnbution by the County Engineer may result in preparation of a traffic
analysis or off site improvements to existing infrastructure
f
t
KImball, Sandy
,
From Hemmings Bill
Sent Tuesday January 06 1998 10 00 AM
To Jones Tammy
Cc Engelhard Scott Pederson John Harper Pat Kimball Sandy Franz Dean
Subject ZE 61 97 Dwight Hume
1 7 98
I received the above referenced application on Jan 2 1998
This project lies in an area of approved soils so a concept drainage plan is not required
I have no knowledge of any critical areas on this site
I consider this application to be technically complete
VC& ~
Page 1
i
i
NOTICE OF PUBI.IC HEARING
SPOKANE COIJNTY HEARING EXAMINER
T'O All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOYJ ARE HE1tEBY 1VOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC ]HEAI2ING WII,L BE HELl) 0N THE
LANI) iJSE APPLICATION LIS'I'EID BELOW, AS FOI,I.OWS
Application File No ZE-61-97, Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 1 43 acres for a medical
office building
Hearing I)ate and Time May 6, 1998 at 1 30 p m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Applicant/Owner Maxwell & Sinto LLC, c/o James Wolff, 422 W Riverside, #1407, Spokane, WA
99201
Agent Dwight Hume, 107 S Howard, #325, Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 456-7402
I,ocation Generally located south of Maxwell Avenue, north of Sinto Avenue, west of Houk Street and
approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road in the NW '/4 of Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44EWM,
Spokane County, WA
Comprehensrve Plan Urban
Zoning I)esignation Urban Residential-3 5(LJR-3 5) and TJrban Residential-22 (UR-22)
Environrnental I)eterminatlon A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the County Division
of Building and Planning, as the lead agency The official comment period ends May 4, 1998
Related Permits None
Division of Bualdiog Planning Staff Tammy Jones, Associate Planner (509) 456-3675 ext 225
HEARING EXAIVIINER PItOCEI)UItES
Hearing Process and Appeals The heanng will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
tlle Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Heanng Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action All heanng will be conducted in facilities which are physically accessible
to persons with disabilities
Inspect'on of File, Copies of DocuIInents A Staff Report wnll generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building and Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026
W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, between 8 a m and 4 p m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays
Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or
special needs, please call the Division at (509) 456-3675 Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn Tammy Jones,
Associate Planner, along with file no ZE-61-97 Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260-0245
t
1)ETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "D1VS"
SPOKA1VE COUNTY IDIVISgON OF BUIL,DIIVG AND PLANNING
RESPOIVSIBI.E OFFICIAL, JAMES L 1VdANS01l1, DI]EtEC'TOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NiJ11ViBER ZE-61-97
DESCRIP'I'gOIV OF PROPOSAL Zone reclassification froln Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5)
and Urban Residenttal-22 (UR-22) to Urban Resldentia1-22 (UR-22) on approximately 1 43 acres
for a medical office building
APPLICANT/OWNER Maxwell & Sinto, LLC, c/o James Wolff
OWNER'S D►ESIGNATEI) CONTACT Dwight Hume, 107 S Howard #325, Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 456-7402
LOCATIOIV OF PROPOSAL Generally located south of Maxwell Avenue, north of Sinto Avenue,
west of Houk Street and approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 15,
Township 25N, Range 44EWM, Spokane County, WA
b,]EAD AGENCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
I)E'Y'ERNIINA'I'gON The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file vvith the lead agency This
information is available to the public on request
This DNS is lssued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this I)1vS Ynust be
submitted no later than 4 00 p m, May 4,1998, if they are intended to alter tbe I)NS ADl
comments should be sent to the coatact person listed below►
By Tammy Jones Title Associate Planner
Phone (509) 456-3675
Address Spokane County Divlsion of Building and Planning (MS-P)
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260-0050
I)ATE ISSLTED /U, , 1998 SIGNATURE _ 6t~
COMMIIN'TS REGARDING ENVIRONMIIqi'AL CONCERNS ARE AT THE G
APPEAL OI+ THIS I)E'TERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLArINING, (MS-P), I st Floor, West
1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the
signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and the
appeliant should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Divis2on of
Building and Pianning to assist you with the specifics for a SEFA appeal
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Qlympia)
2 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Pat Harper
3 Spokane County Division of Utilrties, Jim Red
4 Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
5 Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6 Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair, Steve Horobiowski
7 Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley
8 Spokane County Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell
9 Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles
10 Spokane Transit Authority, Christine Fueston
11 WA State Department of Transportation, Keith Martin
12 Long Range Planning Division, John Mercer
13 Fire Protection District No 1
14 Central Valley School District No 356
15 Modern Electrlc Water Co
.
-
1 ' ' ` •
AT/-bmiL~
1
Maxwell Sinto L.L.C. Rezone
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
. ~ SPOtU1NE EKYIROtC1£MTAL OROIMAMCf
~ (YAC '191-11-960',o
Section il 10.230t11
EnvirOn+wn[al Cl+tCk11it
r~
Pvrpose of Checkllit: fIle No.
?he Statt Environoentat oollcy lkt lSEPA) cRaDter 43.21C RC'W. reQulres a11 qmernsental •gencles to tonsider t►+e environmental iraoacts af a oropasal
before making Aecisions. An Enrironrental lra0att Stateemnt (EIS) must be prepared for al) Drooosals rfth proCaDle significant adverse impacts on
the aw lfty of the envirornyent. The purpose of thli Chectll5t ts to Drovide infor'avtiOn i0 I+e1D you and the agenty identify lmqatts froo your
proposal (and to reduce or aro1E i+qatts froa the proqosal. if tt can De done) and to help tne agency decide rhether in E15 is reQuircQ.
Instructions for Applicants:
Thii environ.ental CAetklist asks you to deSCrlb! Sooe bas1c lnfarmatton •boui your proposai. Governeentai agencies ust this CheCtlist to deter+.ine
rAether the environaental iaipatti of rour proDOSaI •rt slgnificant. requirinq preparation of an EIS. Ansrer the questions brieily. rith the most
precise inforsatiort knarn, ar glve the best descrlptton rou can.
'1ou aust anirer eath questton aCCUrately anC Carefully. to the Dest Of rour knwlcQqe. In ioosi tasei. you should bt abie t0 answer the questioni
frow your ovn observations or projeCt plans rltAOUi the neeE to hire exOertS. If rau really do not know tht ans+rer, or t1 a question CoeS rtot aD01Y
to your proposal. vrite 'do not knw' or 'does not apply.' Cooplete ansrtrs to the qwstlons naw w r arofd unnecesiary delays later.
Sone Questions ask aDout qovernmentsi ngulations, such as zoning. sAOrellne. inE 1anda+rk desigrutlons. Answer tl+ese Questtons 1f you csn. (f you
Aave probless, the goverrr.ental a9enctcs can assist yae.
Thc ChetklSSt queztlons apD1r to all parts of your 9ropozsl. even if you Dlan ta d0 thns over a ptriod of time or on dlfferent parCeli Of 1and.
Attath any additional lnforaAtl0n that w111 CesCribe your proposal 0r 1ts envtronsental effeCti. Tht igen[y Co yh1ch y0u SuDatt [his [heCtlisi may
ast rou to explain your ansrefs pr provide addittonal In(orwtfan reasonablr relitcd to detem tning tf Cnere w y De siqniflcant •drerse ieoatt.
Use of cnectlist for nonprojeCt Qroposals:
Caaplete thts checkiist far nonproject prooosais. eren tnough ovcstioies aar Oe ansyered 'Coes not sco17'.
IN ADDITIOM, ca+plete the SUPPIEMETITAL SHEET FOR NO!1PROJEtT ACTIOMS(Part D).
For nonprojeCt aCtions. Lhe referencei 1n the CheCtltst to the wo►ds 'OfojeR 's4011cant.' and 'OroOerty or site' snould Ot read as 'DrQOOSaI.'
'proooser.' anE 'aflected geoqrapntt area.' resoectlvely.
A. 8ACICGR OUNO
t. ywe or vroooseo vrojecc, +f aovlicable: M d X W P 1 1 S i L1 t o L_ L_ G_
t. 4a.e or +►ppi;c,nt: Same-, C/O ~,Tames A olff manaqinq 1i1PItlbP?"
7. Address and Ohone nurnDer of applitant or Contatt person: DW 1gh t J. H um e
Suite 325 107 S. Howard St.
SpoKane, Wa.99201 4D6-i4uz
1. Date checktizt preoared: D e C. 1997
5, AqencY requestir►q tnecklist:
6. Proposed tining or scheOule (fncludlnq pnasin9. if applltaDle):
Immediate uvon approval (sprinq of 1 998 )
l. a. Do You Aare sny plans tor futur: addltiarts, exDanSlon. or further aettvity related to or connected .ith tf►ts prooosai? If yes, exalafn.
YP~-,_r t-hQr,o ;,ay hP ar3di t-i nnal 1 and ar1r3Pr7 i-n fihP yt,e,-,t
which would be liited to parkinq and landscapinq. Subiect
e. oo you o-+-d! bXAQO ;'P944,tn.
Nor see above
8. List sny enrironmental infonsatton you knor aDout tn+t Aas been 0*epared. or rill De pre9ared. directly related to tf+i1 prpposal.
A T),NC y~c i CCl7Pd '~l~r t-hA Qr'93T1~.3.L1S ~R ~tni t anartmPnt pro_jje_C:t'
.
1 nc-a-ted on the westPrlv 3 of the subi ect DroAertv.
See ZE -28-95.
Re..titiea ~
~ SP7tCAiiL L-WIAOtM`r'..AI. oRDINAlICE
(1AC 197-11-qbG1 Sec:tar. 1:.IC.:]0(1) . i ~
~ .
~ A, aAC7CC10Q'1'J l con: laued
4. Ro rou knw vh,etler •pollcat.ona are Pcndtng for gover:ssental ■pproval• ot ocner pronosals rect lr :ne proDe,-;•: coveree trr vour
proposal' yes, e:p:aSa. .
i~T n
10. I.ist •a7 governeeoc approvals or peroits that vill De needed tor your proqooal.
p • C1= nermi fiQtBi,i 1 di nQ PPrmi fi; Drai naQe Plans ;
ti4a .r Plans.
ll. GL•e • bcief, camplete descrlption ot 7 wr proposal, tM 2uding the pcoqcsed uses aad c!u si:e o( the pro;ect and atce 'ticre are aevera!
duestlotu Lter !n this thecScliat t'ut asi rou to descriQe certaln •Npects of ;rour proposal. You do not need to repuc ;Aose atuvers on chls
page.
4- f-SAZ~-C}nr3Z mPrli c-a 1 nf f i mP b»; 1 di nQ on 1.43 acres in-lieu-of
28 ax)artments on 2/3 of the sub-ject site per previous DNS of
ZE-28-95.
12 -O,e~ e,
R U /Z - 2,~,?
(1!~7
~
Loeatton of tye ;rooosal. Glve •ut!ic:ent tntor-macton :or a person to underscand the prec:se locat n1' our ;ropose: a
ftreet address, •nv, and sec[:on, cowmsAip •nd rsngt, tf knavn• I` • Dtopo u 1 woul: occur ower a:ar;e are&, I-ll•:!!e -anqe or
bounCatles of :rte ii[e(s) Tsovide a lega: description. otts ptan, rlt:",l:y sap. and :o"Zrapnfc cessoru D1. sva: ~A~;e. :-Ir vou
snould fu0elc any p;anM requlred by the a;enc), rou •ce not repulred Co dupltta[e smp• or de:ai!ed plans subl:;e: v1tA an~ :er=:: an::l:ac:on
reLted co tRls ctxckl:at.
° -~nnrnximat-P1 u 4QQ ' eaSt c~f Pi npS hPtwPPn MaXWell aild S1Ilt0
~
" west of Houk in the Spokane Valley.
i4 10114
:7. Joes the proOoseC act.on :le vt:*%:n t-we Aq,:Ster ServiClvc #.re• (ASAI' - 1e Ge:+e[al Sever Se:v;Ge Area' "u ?7:_7::v Sever ier:'ce {teae
C::~• ot Spokane' 'See Sflo'riae Lawtv's A5,► ~vet!a• :one kt!s~ `.or Sevndarlea1.
ASSA, PSSAI IUGA
-oecc
OKFl.t'LD dT APP•-, _CA.r,
Q~'.I~OTQT„/►L p..~^~r,5
=valua::a' 'z•
Ngencv :se ?r,:y
~ . rApT
a. Cenecal deacriptLOn ot t1e slce (clccle one): tLt, rolllNg, klt1Y, stee0 slopen, aounutnws,
oCher:
flat '
b. ''hat is the sceepeit slope on the •l[e ;sqpro:taace psccent slope)'
N/A
c_ 'fiat general :7Pea of fol:s •re :ound on the alte (.`or example. clAr, w nd. Sravel, peat, auctl'
LI You 5enow the c:aaslf:ca;lan of s;rlculiursl •o{la, specLiv Chea •nd nate anr prlmr .`ar land.
r~ n
~
d. \te Chete •ur:aee :::t2cat:ons ot h2stoe^v of utvtabie ~oil$ tn :!x lmedLa[e vielnttv' ~
deaectbe.
t
No ~
~
~
I
E
~ . . SPOKJIN£ EJIYIRONriEMTAI OADINANCE
(vaC 117-11-960) Sect ton 100.230(l)
• '
B. ENVIROIMENTAL ELfHENTS(continucd)• '
Evaluation For
Aqcncy Use 4nly
e. OesCribe tne purpose, type, and soVroxi+++atr vw ncities of any f1111ng or grading Draposea.
Indicate source of ftll.
No new soil will be imported.
f. Cou1C erosion o aur as a resul[ of [learing, constructton. or use? If so. generally descriDe.
~n
~
g. Abou[ rAat pertent of tne slte r111 pe tovered rith 1mpervlous surfates afttr project ConsLrut-
Lion (for exaeple, •sphalt or builCings)'
61% ot the site will be covered. 11$ Building
and 39$ pavement.
ProposeC measures ta reduct or control eroslon. or other ispacts to tne e+rtn. tf inr:
Cover top soil if subject to severe storm ~
exposure and Blo-Swale drainage control.
2. A1R
a. Yhst type of eniSSionS to the afr roulG result fram t1+t Dr0P0s+l (+•e•. 4u5t. autowbtle, oCOri
industrt;l. rood S+s+okel durtng Conitruttton and rnen the projeCt ti C wmleted-' If any,
generally Eescribe and give aDOroxuute qwntttes 1f knwn.
D11ri ncl nnnatr»rt i nn.- ecrti~?'~Qnt Pmi SSlOT1S r C~llSt
anddemol ; s ion ? Af tPr : Inarress and egress of
customer vehicles. . ~
~
,
b. Are thtre any off-sitt Sources of emizsions or odor that w r affeC rour Drooossi? If so, ~
I
9enerally describe. I
No .
R
t
(
C. ProDOSeC measures to reCute o► Control emtsslons Or Other faqacts to •1r. 1f anr: ~
ComDliance with SCAPCA regulations; paving
and landscaping. ,
3, WATER
A. Surface:
l1S ls thtre any surface rater body on or in the 1amedtate rlcinity of the stte includlnq year-
round and seasonal streans, saltrater, lates. Oonds. vetlands)? !f yes. Oescrlbe type •no
provide names. If approDri+te. statt vhat strea■ or river ft flo.+s into. .
(2) Nill the project revutre any wrk over, 1n. or sdjacent to lrltt+tn 200 fectl the Etscribed '
raters? If yes. please descrl0e and attacf+ available plans. ~
~
I . . ~l
3
• ' . • STOLI]Ee LMllOlQMY'.1L ORDINANCZ
CJAC 197-11-960) Seccioa 11.1b.230(1)
~ .
' D. CNVIROtMNTAL '
CZ-L%M-'T'5 (con[lnued)'
Evalwclon For
Agency Use OnlY
(7) Eacimace the •souot o[ [ill and dred`e ~cerlal cl+ac wvuld be p Lced in or resoved trom the
•urlace wacer or vetlands •nd indltate the •re• of the site tlut vould De aftected. Indtcatc
the •ource of lL11 a~ce~lal.
N/A • '
(4) Vtll the pcoposal requlre surfac• y[et v1tM tavala ot llvecsloti.' Glve •=eoeral descriq- • ~
tioa, purpose. •ad appro:iaate QuancSclem. if kaove•
No
(5) Doe& che proposal lle v1[Rin • 100-rear Ilood pLalo! Il w, eote lou tloe on [Ar •1te p Lo.
No
(5) Uoes the proposal tnrolve any discharZe• o[ vu te o&cerlal• to surface vaters' If go,
describe the type of vaste artd •oticipated w lure of d1scRarse•
No
D. Ground:
(1) vill sroundvater De vithdravn, or vtll vacer be dioelActed co groue+dvacec' Ctve tenetai
descrlpclon, puc-pose, •nd •pproxlnate auaatlties, il kmow•
c:;t o rm jAi. t- o r 1~',~-d-i sshar-gzd t"v--u'"rz- .
WPZ1Sr
Deicribe vaste sacerlal Chst vill S. d1scM rged loto tt+r Srouod trvm sept3c tanks or other
saolLary vaate [YUCaent [ac111t7. DeacriDe the teoeTri aise o( Che sysce. the numDer ot
housea co be servad (1: applicable) or che num0er o! perwor the •7sces(O are e:pecced co
serve.
See above
DescriDe any srscems, oct+er [han chose designed tor the dlsposal ot aanltary vuce,
irtstalled tor the pur7ose o[ dlsc M r=3n= (luldr Delov the gromM/ rurtace (loeludes srscems •ucA
•s chose for the dlsposal ot scots vaser or draina;e (ron t2oet 4[aias)• Deserlbe the type e(
systea, the •sounC of aacerisl to be disposed ot tArough clr q0t4M and the c77e• of sacerials
llkely co be dlsposed o( (lncludln; asterials vAlch aoy eeeet tAe n mcm inada rcently tfizough
spills oc ss • resulc oi tirsfi=htint aCL1v1Lits).
Approved Bio-swale system for storm water
(4) Vill snr chalcals (espeeia117 or;anle solvent• or pecroleam !uels) be stored Ie above-
around or underground scocage canju•' Ii •o, vt+Ac qpes asd qaaotities ot macerials v11I De
scored?
None known
.
I ~
. ' !TO[ANL LRQIYOplQ?r'JS. ORDIHA7IQ
(VAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.L0.230(1) '
' S. LFPI ROMQNiAL CI.L+Mr.-S ( c o o t 1 nued i • '
°valuaCion For
(5) ~c Agenc7 Use Only
proteccive oe uures will De taken to tasurs tFut leak• or op111• of •n7 chesiu ls
stored or used on site will not De •lloved to peccolace to ;roundvater (thi■ lnclude• eeasures
co keep chealcals wt o( dlsposal s71sces• descrlDed ln 3b(2) •od )b())'
If applicable, ASSA standards would apply
c. VaCer P.unoff (lncludlns •toca vater):
(1) Deseclbe the •ource ot cvnoff (lneludics •con vacer) aod metbd of collsctlon aad dispoaal
lf aoy (lnclude quanticlei, it kaovn). VTter• will thlm wacet []ov'. V111 tAls rter Ilov inco
oEher vacers' If so, dcscriDe. ~
Run-of f would occur due to 61 % site coverage
of building and pavement.See site plan ot
record.
Vq/
l -
'J111 anr chemlcals be •cored, haodled or wed oe che sltc la • lou tloe vhere a spill or
lesk will drain co surface or arouna.►.t.r or to a •cora vacer disposal s7sts diulur;ina to
surfact or ;iovndvater'
No
Could vaste materlal• encer ground or •urfatt r ters' it •o, aenerally descrlbe.
n."l~.~averf 1 nw run-of f of bio-swale areas.
d. Proposed measure• to reduce or concrol surlace, gtound, aad cunolf vater tspac[s, t! •ny (if
t che proposed ac[Son 11es vithln che Aquif*r Sensitlve Aru De espec1a117 clu r oe expl&natloaa
r Telatins to faclliCl*s coaeeralnj SoeClon• 3E(4). 3b(5), •od 3c(2) o! Chls cluckllst):
~AA ahnvP and_site plan
of record.
Pui.-'S
a• rheck or circle crpe ot vegecacion (ound oa che slte:
X_ declduous tree: alder, aaple, •spen, o[Aec.
X evecgreen tree: Iir, cedar, pine, other.
_Y_ sArvbs.
X jiass.
pasture.
crop or =rain.
veC soil pLati, catcall, buctereup. pullnuh, •kimlc cabbage. oc:+er.
racer plants: vater lilly, eelgrass, d lfoil, ocher-
ocher.
[7pes oi ve;etatlon.
b. Yha[ kind and uount of ve;etacion will De rsoved or •Icered' E x i s t i n cx v e cr i t a t i o n
wnu 1 d hP u-5Pd if healthv and suitable for areas
of site plan showing landscaping.
Llit threitened or eadan ared s ~
a pecies 1mown to be on or near the oi[e.
None ~
d. Proposed laadsupiag, use of oaclve pLots, o[ other aeuure• to pcesene or enlunce vegetatloc '
on [he eLCe, if •nr:
See above (b) and site plan of record
~
s
~ SPOK1►1(E ENYIRORMENTAL aR01NANCF
(W:.C 13'-„-96C; ;ec:ton li.(b.230(1)
,
1 ~
B. EMY;ROt+MEMTAL ELErE►fTS Icancinued)
~
Evaluati0n For
Agency Jst Only
S. ANINAL,
d. -irClp dny O)rCS ena eninalS rniCn nare been oCServeO on or near tne Site or are tnorn Cz :e
t
or near tne site:
birOS: hark, nerzn. eaqle. Songbirds, oth« : s o n q b i r d s
mannali: detr, otar, eik, beaver, other:
f +sn: bass, salmon, trouc, herring, snellftsh, otner:
atner:
b. ltst any thredtenM Or enCanglrM SDeCies knarn CO De On Or near tht 11te.
None
c. :s [ne site par; of a niqr3tion rou:e? If so, exniain. VJ10 W ~
N ~
E c
0. ProDOStd neasures :o preserve or ennenCt rilGllfe. 1f aer:
N/A
EtiEa3r AYO VATUqAL
a. -ihe[ kintli af !ne►qy (!lectrit, nacural gaS, vood stove, soiar) rlil De used to meei tne
*.'l! Comoteted ;rneC•'S ener9y netGS' GeSCriDe wnether tt rfll Dt ust4 for hes[tng, manu!eC-
(urinq, e[:. ~ ,
electrical and aas for heatinq
h. -iould your oro:ec: affec: .ht Doientlii uSe 0f So1dr eneryy Dy aCjatent pro0ertleS.' !1 i:.,
g2nerdily dtSCrt?!.
No
c. '-111at kin05 0f enerqr corse-vation fee.ures are incluatd in tne D1ans 0f tM S Orooosel' _-s:
0:1er Prp00St: r+!SSUr!S 'eCUC! Gr C7ntr01 tntr9Y 1rpaC:S. if •nY:
N W F.nPrav C_nc3P cninr~l~i_anr'A
1. ENVIRONME'IT u HEAL'N
a. Are there sny envtrorxnen;ai nealtn nazards. 1ncluEtnq exoosure to toxlc cnewicali. rist of flre
and e:piosion, soill, or nazardous raste, tnat Could ocCUr as a n sult of this Droposal' :f so,
destribe.
Nnnp nnwr
(1) DesCribe sZe-13; tmCr'9 MCr servtces thet ntgn[ De reouired.
T~T r. r, .y
6
V
I
' • 9PORAAL IIMIOtCQ.~'+AL OtDI:IARCL
(WAC 10'-11-960)~ See[lon 11.10.270(1)
. •
E. CR7IRO2QSLT'JL LLX@t^$ (ccntlnued) Lvalwclon For
116ency U~e anly
E27VtRONlQ':':I~1. NLAL'R (concioued)
v
(2) Pioposcd aeaeures to reduce or control eavironimental baalcl+ hatarda. 1t aay:
None `
b. Notse:
(1) vhat t7yes of ooise ezlst lo the •rea vhich aay aitect 7aur project (fot exasple: ttatiic,
equlpaenc, opera[Soo, o[her'
~Tr~nc
(2) vhac t7pes aud level• ot noisa would De crsated br or aaaoclAted vitA tl+e yro }ct oa •
short-tera or • long-ce n basis (for ezample: craific, corntruccion, operatioe. o«rr)' I'dicasc
vhat hours noisc vould coae ttos che slte.
Short- tPrm~ Coostruction/demo-litio
Lonq Term: Ingress egress patients
(7) Proposed seasure to reducr or control noise tmpacts, tl aoy:
Development per site plan of record
~ -
8. U':D AND SHORELi':L USf
a. Wltac tn the cvtrenc w e ot the •ice snd adjacent propettlss'•-N' nf f i r P
_W- rPqident?al and commerciala E: Hospital;
e. nS:I neF.Un"" c"J}Q,.itu«? ir .o, ae.cTle..
No c. Descrtbe any •truccnres on tSu stce. Ys ~ S/F and 1 DuDlex
d. vtll •ny scruccures be deno11s1►ed' Il so, vhlch'.
Yes. all of them .
e. Whac la che current soning c L ssiiicacloo of the sicet UR - 2 2 I UR 3.5
t. Whac io che cucroac c mprehenslve p Ln desigtucloa ot cM mite? T r h a n
q. Tf appllcable, vlut 1• cAs turrent •horellne aascec protcAs desiIpnstioo o( LNe s1[e'
N/A
A. Ha• an7 part ot ttu slte been classiflcd •s an 'eavitoaMMnca.llT wmltlve' •rea' II w, ~
speclty. (
!
i. Approxisatelr hov a&or people vould reslde or vork in the cGODl« *d yroject? .
Approx. 10
~
7
" sroica.M EWIsore¢xcu. omirieACa
(4AC 197-11-964) Seerlon 11.20.230(1)
~ E. LRVIROH?QMAl,' QJl.(L" (eoatlnwd) .
'_valwtlon Fo[
A;enc7 Use Only
J. Appco:ioately hov aauy people would the cospleted project dimplace' A-ni--)r.Qy - ~
k. Propoaed srasures co •.oid or reduee diap L c sent lapaccs, it •n7:
Possible relocation of units if feasible.
1. Proposcd measures [o ensure the proposal la comyaciDle vitA ezlscing and Ptojected Lnd uae• •nd
plans, iE •nr:
Development per site plan of record
9. HOUSIHG
Appro:laatelr hw aany unics would Dw ptovided. it sOTt Lodicat• utather higlr-. aiddlr, or ~
lorlntoat housinR.
N/A ~
D. Appro:i"telr hov aanr uaits, 1t aay, would De eliainated1 Iodi ute vheclrr hifh-, alddle-, or
lov-tncooe houalett.
5
c. ProposeA aeaturgs to reduce or concsol f►w aln; impucs. !f aoy:
I
10. AES-IIV-ICS
Vhat l• [he [allest heltht of any proposed structure(*), oot lac2ud2aC •nttrimAs ' vhat 1o the
principal e:iertor Duildlns aacerial(e) propoead'
2-story 35'
b. Uh4t vievs !n the :m ed1a[e vlclnity would be •ltered or oDst ncted'
View would be opened
C. Proposed measures to reEuce or control aroc Mtlc lapacts, it •ny:
DeveloD ner site plan of record
14 y+r.1/~ I ;r~~'1• ~OhI ✓I y
ac! ~
11. tIGRT AltD CL.►RE
'lRat type o[ liahc or t L re vlll tde yropoaal ycoduce'. 'n+ac cise ol Aay rould it o17 occur'
Indirect lighting of parking area and ~
interior lighting
b. Could liahc or =Lre frvs che fSnisAcd pro}ecc b+ a aa(ecy lusard or isteclan vlth •Lvet !
c. Hhac a:lftlag otf-site •ource• of li;hi or pLre tiy affect )our ropoSal'
Other nearby commercial and of~ice uses ~
d. lroposed aeasure• co reduce or contsol llahc and f L re ispaets. !f aay:
Tndirect light;nQ
e I
.
• - ' SP9LAlrL VMIRONH-'rTA:. i}RDIRA.KGE
(uAC 191-I1-954) Sec.locr 11-~E0.230(1) t ~
~
B. MaROMewru. F7wr:s (eaQci~nw~)
Eraluscfon Fnr
1~iSICy SiSC Qill;/
.~rio~+
iz. ~ECxI
a. U'hat de@lgna[ec' •nd lnlarmul reecer[lo"l apgorcunltie• ■re !n the i.x-eu':ate vic:nt:Y`
Missivn Park a.s approx. 1mile to the NW
b. Uauld the proposed pcojsc[ dlsp Lc: anr e:iatinz [ecreaclonal ua:s? if w, desrrlAe.
N~
c. Proposed s"syrss to raduee or ean[rol lspicts oa recreatioa, iaeluding ctcrescioaal esqpot:uet-
c:ea co t>e pravlded hi the QfUjlCt 4r appliu nc„ Lf •ny:
None
l3. HIS 4ltIC ANM GVL:UMS. pRLStRVA-ION
a. Are ttwcrE anr plates or ab}ettr 11s[sd an or prvpostd for niasianal. acstt ar lacal preser+a-
Cian regYster• knovn to be on or aexs to tlst sitet Lf gecsera1.27 elestsibe.
Na recard of anv
b. Ce:Terai2.y deae-Sbe •ay landaaek■ or eridence af hissorie archarolagica.l, *cieat:llc or cui:u:a+
tzpOr[ante kn o" to bc an ar nexs ia [he •iir.
~T
c. Ysapased aeasurer to reduee ar coocrol lapacra. Li any:
•[Z a:~
14. :;.AIPS P4R'A: ION A. Iden[ify yuhlLc streets aod higt+Yay• rec+ring cMr al[: aad dererLbe yraposcd acces• to :t+a
eslocing ssraet system. 5hcrvn site plana, L( ant.
P-~~s anr~ ~ s i nn _o HQ.u~k S into ~r Maxwe l1
b- [o ai[e curreacly acr,rtd br publLt traLaaic' If not. vAat i+ ctx eppro:taate discaaee to tse
ne-atrr[ [raessiC ricp' .
Yes, Route ZO Va11ey Trentwood Feeder
C. norr sany park.la; apactr vauleC s!u COSPl![Rd pao}oet 'aas++' $ov +r+v7' +wuld the QT9jeCL elianmace'
SQ parkinq stalls are required and
proposed.
d, uLll [he peopoaal cequire snr e+ev tamids or ■creecs, or Llptcmmrn[s to ezlstlog roads or atreees
rsor LncludiaQ driveraDr'f If ao, aeaerrlly drscribe (iMiurr vAeehfr gubiie ar prtvaYC).
Yes, dedicatians, widening and sidewalks
to al1 three trontages.
e. vill the pro'eet use (oc aeeur in the lmrdiate rtetaity af) +aer=, raif, or air traaspuctat.on'
I: so, generaPl' deacri'be.
LaV
1 ~
9
• ' , . . STOICANL Llf7IZUl~lQRZA1. OQDIIIAHCL
(Vnt 197-11-460) S~ctioo 11.I0.230(1)
E B. QWIIROtlMr"..A3, L'I,OMfTS (Continurdl '
L•aloacioa For
l1`enq Use Oo17
6-
t. Hov aanr vehlcular trips per dar vould be geoe[aced by the ctaPlsted p[oject' If kaovn,
tndicaCe vhen peak vould occur.
See attached discussions Wlfh-WSDOT
t. Proposed seasurem to teduet or coatrol tranaporcacioa lmpac[i. il •a7:
Improvements as revuired bv CoT FnginQPr
and fees if any to WSDOT.
15. P(TbtIC SERVjCLS
a. Siould C1►e ptoject result la aa locru sed ow d for public •It71Ce/ (toc esswpla, l1Te ptotectloe,
polic• pVocectioc, healtl► care, achools. othec)t It so, geneta117 AaKTSbl.
NQ
b. Proposed •easures Co reduc• or cootrol dlrecc Lspacc• on puDllc Ier+lces. i.' any:
IN?-
16. I.:ILI':IES
a. Ctrcle uclllties eurtsntly ••ai L Dle at the •lte: •loecrititr, wcural sas, w;cer, re(u.e
servlce, telephone, saeitary •ever, oeptlc srstes, otltir.
Al1 utilities are available but hook
ups will be required at the property lines.
b. Describe the ucilitles ctuc •rc proposed for cl+e pTOject, tl+e utilit7 providlc` the senice aed
rhe :eoecal constrvctloo acc1Yltles oe the aice or lu the l-dist• n'leiaitT vhtch alght De
needed.
See Above
C. SIGNATIIRL v
L. cM underalgned, rveas under the peetilt7 ot perjury t2ut the •bove tes0oesei ara made crutAtully aed co cl+e Degc of ay tnovlcd&e. I aloo
uederstaad thAc, slould thece be ser villtul dsrepreseecacion or villtnl Lek o[ full dlacloeure oa wy oarc, the aRene► aay vicAdra.. •nr
determination ol nocuignilitaece that !c alght lssue in rellaoe• upoe t41• elsclclist.
o.t.: 0~. ~I S 7 ,,,.nt . C' j n T)w i crh t- .7 . Hume
(T inc or type ' `
Pro,onenc: mat...: Suite 325 107 S.Howard St.
P,,,,.: 456-7402 Spokane, wa. 99201
~
tarwo coaplecing [ors: nl ght j- UuIDP ac~: 4G'E~~ 9'
P,orm: yS-?, • 40Z
TOR 5'fATT QSL OKLT
r
Sca[i ss be revtevin6 eheckllsc:
Dssed oo s•caff revlav of the enrironaeatal checklisc ot petclnenc infoematfon, che scalt:
A. Conclude• Chat there aTS no p[oDabl• oignlfiuut •d+erse lapKi• anl retamaeods s dttscalsiscloo of nooml6a:!lcsoee.
d• Conclude• clsac probabl• signilieact •drerse enricons ntal laqact• do ei1ac Lor tlrr currest Oroyosal •nd reeOuend• • altlgaceG decer-
sloacion oi ooaslgniflesnce vitA conditioeu.
C. Coacludes that cAere are yrobable •i`nlfiunt adverae ecrironmencal 1aWcts aad recommeod• a datetvloat;on ot g1gn1:1unte.
TILIf1G TS - =71.00
10
SF'4KANE CbUN`tY DIVISION C?F BlJ1LD1NG AND PLANNIIVG
ZONE RECLASSiFICATION APPLICAT14N
PARTI
A GENERAL INFORMATIt7N
Legaf Owner Maxwell & Sinto L L C C/O James A Wolff
Mailing Acidress 422 W Rlverside Suite 1 407
City Spokane State wa ZMp Code 992 01- 03 9 7
Phone 6 2 4- 21 61 (VIlorlc) (Home) Fax 6 2 3 -11 8 6
App4cefltlAgent Dwight J Hume
Mailing Address Suite 325 107 S Howard St _
City Spokane _ State Wa Zip Code 99201
Phone 4 5 6- 7 4 0 2 (Work) {Home) Fax 4 5 6- 7 3 5 7
IF 14PPLICaNT iS NOT OWNER 1NCLUDE WRITTEN OWhlER AUTHQR1cATiON FOR APF'LICANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
ProjectJproposal site area (acres or sq ft } 6 2 4 8 0 s f (1 43 acre s)
Adlacent area owned or controlled (acres ar sq ft ) None
Assessor s parcel numbers of projectrproposal 4 51 5 2 0 8 01 , 0802, 0803f 0804
Assessor s parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or, controlled None
Street address of praposal 1409 N Houk, 1 2 4 2 2 E Maxwe 11 etc
~
Exisrting zone c(assifcation(s) and date established UR- 2 2 ( 19 9 5) UR3 5( 19 5 5)
Existing use of property Residentlal and vacant
Proposed zoning UR- 2 2 f or af f i ce
Camprehensrve pfan categoryr Irrhg n School distnct CV #3 5 6
Water purveyor Modern Fire district Fp# 1
Proposed use of property
Single famiiy dweilings Duplexes O Multifamily dweflings
Manufactured homes Busines Industriaf Mixed use t J
(~ther ( ) Describe medical of ~ice use
List previous planning division acttons involving this property _ZE_ 2 A- 9 5, ZE- 9 9- 5 5
B LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFlCATJON INF4RMATlON
Location o, proposal RptweP-n xw¢I.1 & Sinto' West af Hauk
Section 1~ Township 2 5 Range 44
Name of pubfic road(s) providing access Houk, Maxwell & Sinto via
Plnes Rd and Mission
Vtlidtn of properfy fronkmg on pubiic road 284' Houk, 220' Sinto and Maxwell
ZONE RECLASSIF{CATI(J~ °PLICATION PAGE 2 of 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arteriai? Yes (K~ No
*Indirect access to Pines and Mission
Name(s) of arteriai roads Legal description of property for each zone reclasstfication proposed .
See Attached .
Existing zone(s) UR- 2 2' UR3 5 to proposed zone(s) UR- 2 2 ,
for the following described property
Attach legal description stamped by fand surveyor or provide below ,
See Attached
t ~
If you do not hold title to the property what is your interest in it? .
Agent for Owners _
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feei make this proposal warranted?
What impact wi11 the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
See Attached
What factors support the zone reclassif+cation?
See Attached
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal s impact on surrounding Eand use?
See Attached
ZONE RECLASSiFICA,T(OM r-IRPLICATiON ` PAGE 3 of 4
PART II
This seetaon of the appfication wiii provide the Division of 8uilding and Planning staff with wntten
verificakion tnat the applicant has had preiiminary consultation with the agencies identified
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in the proposaf before finai submittal
to the DivESion
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DISTRICT
A This proposal is withtn Fire Protection District No ~
B Adequate arrangements (bom) {have not} been made to meet our needs in pravidfng fvr an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes
C Recommended f re flow 71'~D , or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive and will be determined at time of building permit application
D Requiremenfs include
t'~ t C~ 1 ~ - ~ 7
Fire Distnct Signature/Title Date
WA''ER PURVEYOR
A Satisfactory arrangements fior domestic water and fire flow requirements #wk*~ (have not)
been made -
8 Requiremenisicomments ?Y'ul'-~ 1~. /I
n
-7
_ Water District Date
COUNTY ENGINEER
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed with the applicant
A Comments
/
./I M.
SjgnaturefTi e Dat
COUNTY UTILITtES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied The designated water purveyor for this site is
A Comments
SignaturefTitle -''Date
REGIONAL HEALTH D15TRlCT
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittaf of this proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied
A Comments Se,,,~-c-..- S~fi~ I•v~ ~
~S
ignature/Title Date
~
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for fne provrsion of public
sewer arP understoad by the app(ccant
A Comments 5 71-, Oc! 5: _ L..A (J/t-; t 1-5 ?"~,t.J
~ u
Signature/Title r'J Date
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ,-APPLICATlON PAGE 4 of 4
PART I I I
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I the undersigned a licensed fand surveyor have completed the information requested for the
zoning map and written legal description
Signed Date ~ 21 ~'R 7
Address ~-70 1 W / rR-2JD Phone q~8- 6vio
'
City D ka Vl e State_/v 4:__ ZiP _"20 q
~
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I the undersigned swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge
I further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identified land use action or if not the owner attached herewith is written permission from the
owner auth rizing my actions on his/her behalf
Signed aUV.PAa Date IZ' Vat?
Address Phone 561 62 f 2,(6(
City seo State WA Zip
- , ~ ~~~-r ► L ~ I ~
Si n re of a i ant or p(Vs?ntatDate
aAA&
State of Washington )
) ss
County of Spokane )
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on this ~ day of , 19 c
by JA&An A WOL-r,:r-
P.lotary Seal
Z E N A M M 0 R T 0 N ~ (INNary Public in and for the State of Washington residing
sTATE oF wasHINGTON ac
AlOTARY --a - PUBLIc ; My app intment expires _K)
MY C0MMiSSI0P1 EXPiRE310-45-04 ~
~
PART V :
TO 8E COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
Date submitted File number -zpi - ~p~ ~q 7
Date accepted ~ b q~ By ~
Total fees _tLV4q x Recetpt number
PREI NEZO E APPL KJS 497
I.egal Description
IVlaxwell & Sinto L 11 C
Lots 1-3, Block 2, Mission View Addition as recorded in Book "T" of
Plats, page 27 Records of Spokane County, Washington
C~Z
.~.ti oV WAS ffk
~G
~0, 31120
~~~ISTCnv
s~oYvqL LAND 5~.
ExPiREs 12n/
~
e
~
a
Rezone 5upplement
Maxii ell Sinto I, L C
What are the changed conditions of the area «hich 3 ou
feel make this proposal warranted"
The westerly two-thzrds of the subject property was zoned UR-
22 for apartments in 1995 The property to the north was zoned UR-
22 in 19$7 (ZE-32-87) Properties to the west and northwest have
been zoned B-1 and B-3 per (ZE-84-81) and (ZE-36-94) Ad3acent to
the east across Houk, the property was zoned for offices in ZE-42-85
The balance of property remains UR3 5 formerly ZE-99-55
An examination of the surrounding area reveals a transition
from residential to busxness on the west half of the block and to
apartments and office on the east half of the block within this
immediate area Mast of the UR-22 zoning wxthin this area is being
done fvr medicai related office uses This proposal would be
consistent with that concept
What impact K i11 the proposed zone reclassification
have on adjaceat properties9
The proposed office use is for medical purposes The site plan
of recvrd shvws an orientatlon of the office away from the remaining
residential to the west towards Valley General Hospital, with
landscaping, bio-swales and extraordinary setbacks (47') from the
west property line Ingress and egress is balanced out to each street
frontage and the parking areas are landscaped pursuant tv zone code
standards Furthermore, the proposed use is offlce rather than the
approved 28 unxt apartment complex whlch, conceivably could be
intensified by the addition of 14 or 11 more units to this property
Note too, that the office use is generally considered more cvmpatible
to residential due to its off-setting business haurs to that of
residential use
Finally, the area is generally in transition from residential to
business and office uses within these blocks between Pines and the
Hospital (See Flnding #12 of ZE-28-95) Accordingly, the proposed
use should not have a significant impact to the surrounding area
What factars support the zone classificativn9
The proposed office use is loeated within the Urban Category of
the Comprehensive Plan whieh is implemented by the UR-22 zone
The UR-22 zone is the first zone which permits medical office use
which is the typical vffice use of the vicinlty due to the proximity to
the Hospital and other support services
Rezone Supplement
Maxwell Sinto L L C
Page 2
The UR-22 zone is also suitable for apartment use at the
maximum density range of 22 units per acre It is presumed that the
'medical" office use and the high density apartment uses are similar
in intensity and impact on infrastructure and services Accordingly
the applicable Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban
Category pertain to both types of uses
Therefore, the Staff and Examiner are directed to the previous
decision of ZE-28-95 encompassing the westerly two-thirds of the
subject property and the following Findings of Facts No 's 1, 3, 49 59 69
7, 8, 12, and 13
V`'hat measures do you propose to mitigate your
proposal's ianpact on surrouading land use`'
The development will be in substantial compliance with the
site plan of record Furthermore, the surrounding uses are such that
the use will have minimal impact to there on-going use For example,
the property to the south is a parking lot of a funeral home The use
to the north is a medical office similar to this use The hospital exist
to the east across Houk and, as stated above, the orientation of this
use is away from existing residential to the west
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
INTRODUCTION
Ttus matter has come before the Heanng Exanuner Committee on September 21,
1995 The members of the Committee present are Donald Moore Chair, Brenda
Bodenstein and Frank Yuse
PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Lyle Burnett, requests approval of a Zone Reclassification
ZE-28-95, on approximately 1 29 acres from Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for 28 multi family residences and those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1 The property is generally located south of Maxwell Avenue, north of Sinto Avenue
approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road in Section 15 Township 25 North,
Range 44 EWM Spokane County, Wastungton
2 'I'he Cocnmittee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record
3 The existuig land uses in the area include single farruly residences, medical offices,
commercial uses and Valley General hospital
4 The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area
5 The Comprehensive Plan category of the subject property is Urban and the subject
property is within the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer
Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone The Urban (U) category is intended to
provide the opporturuty for development of a city-l.ike environment wtuch
ulcludes vanous land uses, intensive resxdenaal development and pubiic facihties
and services (water, sarutary and storm sewer lines police and fire protection and
other features) Residential net densiues are suggested to range from 1 to 22
dwelung units per acre in the Urban category The proposed density of 217
dwellmg units per acre is consistent with the density range suggested by the Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan The zone reclassification from Urban
Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) implements the majonty
of the Goals, ObJectives and Decision Guidehnes of the Urban category
6 The proposed zorung does unplement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan
7 The proposal is located between Maxwell and Sinto Avenues Both Maxwell and
Sinto Avenues are local access streets and are not Pnncipal nor Nhnor Artenals as
defined by the Artenal Road Plan
8 The ex.isting zorung of the property descnbed in the apphcation is Urban
Residen(ial-3 5(UR-3 5) previously established as Agncultural Suburban (AS)
zoning in 1955 and redesignated to Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) on January 1
1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code
The proposal does conform to the requu-ements of the proposed Urban Residential-
22 (UR-22) zone
9 The provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Detemrunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued The
Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS
10 The legal requuements for public notice have been fulfilled
11 The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposef~ Lse and the
concerns expressed by the opponents include traffic impacts densiry, and
incompatrble land uses
12 The apphcant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the
onginal zonuig of this area and accorduigly, the proposed zone reclassification is
justified Specifically, changed condiuons include that the neighborhood is in
transition from low densiry residential to more intensive uses such as multi farruly
residences, offices and medical faciliues
13 The proposed use will not be detnmental to the public health safety, morals or
welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing
agencies
14 The Committee additionally finds/concludes
a Traffic impacts from the proposal are adequately nutigated through the
specific nutigation measures specified by Wastungton State Department of
Transportation cond.itions 1, 2 and 3 and agreed to by the applicant
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVA]L
1 All Conditaons unposed by the Heanng Exanuner Committee shall be bind.ing on
the Applicant which term shall include the owner or owners of the property,
heirs assigns and successors-in-interest
2 The Zone Reclassificatioa and followmg Conditions of Approval apply to the real
property descnbed below
Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 of Niission View Addition , as per plat recorded in Volume T
of Plats page 27 in Spokane County Washington
HEARING EXAMINER C(JMIVIITTEE
1 That all structures not exceed a maximum height of 35 feet
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Pa°e 2
G
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUYLDING ANI) PLANNING
1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR 22) zone as
amended
2 The Drvision of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice notulg that the property in question is sub}ect to a
vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action
Tlus Title Notice shall serve as public notice of ihe conditions of approval affecting
the property in questlon The Title Notice should be recorded wittun the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part by the
Division of Building and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as
follows
The parcel of property legally described as j ]is the subject of a
land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative
Official on [ imposing a variety of special development
conditions File No [ ] is available for inspection and copying in
the Spokane Division of Building and Planning
3 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the
concept presented to the Heanng Body Vanauons, when approved by the
Planning Duector/designee, may be pernutted, including but not luruted to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All
vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintained
4 Approval is requued by the Planrung Darector/designee of a specific hghting and
sigmng plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any buildsng pernuts
5 A sgecif'ic landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maultenance
acceptable to the Planning Duectoridesignee shall be subnutted with a performance
bond for the project pnor to release of building pernuts Landscaping shall be
installed and maintained so that sight distance at access poi.nts is not obscured or
impaired
6 Duwt hght from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
7 The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School Distnct and subrrut a
recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for pubhc schools pnor
to issuance of a builciing pernut The agreement shall provide a wntten descnption
of ihe subject property to which the agreement apphes and also state the dollar
amount and any other agreed to trutigaung measures
The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement
to purchase property pursuant to the Revised Code of Wastungton (58 17 205),
that adequate provisions for school facihties must be made conditioned on a future
agreement between the applicant and school distnct
Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School Distnct shall conform to the
requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82 02
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Page 3
$ The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in
order to be inform{ed of code requuemenLs adrrunisteredlenforced as authonzed by the
State Budding Cade Act Design/development concems inelude Addressmg fue
apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, apgroved water systems buiidinb
accessibility, constructxon type occupancy classification exiting extenor wall
pratection, and energy code regulativns (Note The Division of Buildinas reserves the
nght to confirm the actual address at the time of building pernut )
SPOJKANE +CCJUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND RClADS
Pnor To Issuance Of A Building Pernut Or Use Of The Propertv As Prouosed
1 Sidewalks are reqwred along Maxwell Avenue and Sinto Avenue
2 Access pernuts for approaches to the county road system shall be obtauied from the
Sgokane County Englneer
3 T'he applicant shall subnvt for approval by the Spokane Counry Engineer road
drainage and access plans
4 The applicant shall subrrvt for apprvval by the Spokane County Engineer a surface
water disposal glan for the entixe project, or portion therevf, if the development is to
be phased
5 A parkulg plan and traffic cuculation pIan shall be subnutted and approved by the
Spvkane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parksng stalls
shaLl be in accordance with standafd traffic eagmeenng practices Paving or
surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be requued far any portion of
the project which Ls to be occupied or traveled by velucles
6 The construction of the road unprovemenis stated herein shail be accomphshed as
approved by the Sgokane County Engineer
7 All requued improvements shall conform to the current State of Washuigtvn
Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Canstrraction and ather apphcable
County standards andlor adopted resoluuons perta.irung to Road Standards and
Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction unless otherwise
appraved by the County Engineer
8 Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(es) to meet the existIng
pavement on Maxwell Avenue and Sinto Avenue
9 Roadway standards, typicai roadway sections and drainage plan reqLUrements are
found m Spokane Board of Counry Comnussioners Resolution Na 95-0498 as
amended and are appliGable to this proposal
10 No cvnstruction work shall be perfvrnned witlun the existing or proposed publlc
nght-of way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer Ail work
withui the public road nght-of-way ts subject to inspection and apprvval by the
County Engineer
HEC 4rder for ZE-28-95 Pacre 4
.
11 All required construction wittun the existing or proposed public nght-of-way is to
be completed pnor to the release of a building pernut or a bond in an amount
esumated by the County Enguieer to cover the cost of construction of unprovements
shall be filed with the County Engineer
12 The applicant may be requued to grant the applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County right of way per Spokane County Standards in conjuncuon with the
requued sidewalk improvements
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF U7CILITIES
1 A wet (live) sewer connection to thc -.xisting area-wide Publlc Sewer System is to
be constructed Sewer connection pernut is required
2 Apphcant shall subirut expressly to Spokane County Uuhues Department under
separate cover , only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for
Pubhc Sewer connecUons for review and approval by Uubties Department pnor to
issuance of pernut to connect
3 Arrangements for payments of additional sewer charges must be made for pnor to
issuance of sewer connection pernut
4 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coorduiated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
SPOKArIE COUNTY HEALTII DISTRICT
-
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilitles, Spokane
County
2 Water service shall be coorchnated thouch the Director of Utilities, Spokane County
3 Water service shall be by an exisung public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 A pubhc sewer system will be made available for the project and individual sernce will
be provided to the lot Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be
authonzed
5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited
SPOKANE COUNTX AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All aur pollution regulations must be met
2 Au pollution regulations requue that dust enussions dunng demolition construction
and excavation projects be controlled Th.is may require use of water sprays taips
spnnklers or suspension of activity dunng certain weather conditions Haul roads
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Page 5
s
should be treated and errussions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be
controlled as well as errussions from all other construction-related activities
3 SC.APCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i eingress egress
parking areas access roads) be paved and kept clean to minirrLize dust emzssions
4 IVieasures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills accur on paved surfaces
measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces
5 SGAPCA Regulatron I, Article V requires that a Notice of Construction and
Application for Approval be subriutted to and approved by aur Agency pnor to the
construction installation or estabhshment of an a2r pollution source This includes
any fuel fued equipment rated at greater than 440 OOa BTUlhour (boiLF~s hot water
heaters, ovens, etc ) It also includes pasnt booths, and other sources of air
contaaYUnants
6 Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than
burning (i e construction waste etc )
7 Demolztion and renovation projects must comply with the requuements of CFR. 40
Part 61 Subpart M and SCAPCA Regulation I Article IK wtuch address asbestos
abatement issues Intent to Demolish forms are available at the SCAPCA office
SPC}KANE COUNTY FIRE P1tOTECTiUN DISTRICT N4 1
1 Fire apparatus access will reqcure a twenty foot access road We will need a thirty
foot ra.d.ius turn to get past the dumpsters into the parking lots We also will require
an approved fue apparatus turn.around for each parking lot Both lots are over 150
feet deep requu-ing the turnaround
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTNIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1 Withvut sufficient znutigation the intersectican of Pines and 1Vlission will fail as a
result of developments in this area, to which this development does contnbute
Nfiaoation of these unpacts is possible by providing improvements at the Pines and
Mission intersection in add.ition to WSDC?T s already planned interchange
improvements
2 WSDQT has deterinlaed that addulb an extra southbound left tune lane on Pines at
Mission would add capacity to this intersection wluch is needed ta serve
developments such as thts aur scoping estimate has estimated the cost of thts
improvement at $400 000
Based an a traffic study that both Spokane County and WSD4T have reviewed for
an apartment complex prapasal just east of the this site on Mission the pro rata
share was calculated to be $114 40 per hving unit Due to the proximlty of this
srrrular development it would be reasonable, in the absence of a site specifie detailed
traffic study to apply the same $114 OQ per urut fee to this development propvsal
Based on this calculation these proposed 28 units would be responsible for a
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Page 6
0
$3 192 99 fee in 1995 dollars As with previous developments tlus fee would be
collected at building pernut stage
3 That pnor to the issuance of building pernuts for ttus site, the appLcant shall
provide a traffic mitigation fee to WSDOT for Pines Road (SR-27) unprovements
Based on the cost of the needed improvements the pro-rata share for tlus
development has been calculated to be $114 (}0 per living unit (for apartments) in
1995 dollars
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Page 7
a
ORDER
The Hearmg Exanuner Cornnuttee pursuar►t to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion APPROVES the apphcation of Lyle Burnett for the Zone
Reclassification on approximately 1 29 acres from Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3 5)
to Urban Residenual-22 (UR-22) for a 28 urut apartment building and those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone as descnbed in the application
ZE-28-95
Motion by Brenda Bodenstein Seconded by Frank Yuse
Vote (3-0) UNA►NIMOUS TO APPROVE THE Z4NE RECLASSIFICATION
HEARING EX,AMIlVER CONMTTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, O ER VOTE
, . .
~
CHAIR
t~ ~
v -
ATTEST
For STACY BJORDAHL
Acting Pubhc Heanngs Manager
By OW PEDERSON
Ae= Planner
91,IV-. 3--
DATE
Pursuaat to Spokane County regulations any aggneved party has the nght to appeal this
wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners wittun ten (10)
calendar days of the sigrung of this order Upon receipt of an appeal, a pubhc heanng will
be scheduled if you desue to file such an appeal you must subrrut a wntten appeal,
preferably on fonms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,
West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 along with a$215 processing fee payable to
the Spokane County Treasurer
If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building and Planning at (509)
456-2205
HEC Order for ZE-28-95 Page 8
. .
, ~
, RECE VED
JaH o 2 1998
. ~
` 1- •`:a~ 441
S P O K o~43,,~``..; C O U GWEER
f3UI1.UING ANI) PI.ANNING • A DNISION Of THL PUBf.IC WORKS D1:!'AIZTMGNT
JnMrs L. Mr\N5ON, C.R.O., D1R17CTC1R DGNNIS M. SCUlT, P.E., DI(:E:C=1-l1}:
MCMORANDUM
TU: Spolcane County Division of Engineering; Pat Ilarper
Spokane Couiity Division of Utilities;.Iiiil Red
Spokaiie Regional I-Iealth District; Steve IIolderby
Spokaiie Couilty Packs, Recreation & I'air; Steve Ilorobiowsl:i
Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley
Development Lngineeriiig Services; Bill I-Iemiliings
Departmeiit of Trailsportation, Mark IZowhe'.r
Spokane Regioiial Trailsportatioii Cotincil; Gleii Miles
Spokaiie Ti•ansit Autliority; Christine Fuestoil
Bounclary Review Board; Susan VVinchell
Long IZange Planning Division; John Mercer
Central Valley Scliool District No. 356
rirc Discrict Na. 1
Modern Electric Water Co.
I+ IZOM: TaI11111y a0I1CS, Assaciate Planncr J
~
I)ATr: Jaiiuai-y 2, 1998
RI~: 7E-61-97; Zoiie Reclassification from Urban Resideiltial-3.5 (UR-3.5) ancl
Urban Resiciential-22 (JR-22) to Urban Residential-22 (UIZ-22)
TrcT-INicAi, IzrviEyv Mrr~INc
JANUA1tY 1S, 1998 AT 1:15 1'.M.
1)iVIS[ON OF 13UILllING AN1) PLANNING 151 I+LOOR CONrI:RENCC ROOM
('lc:asc review the above application and use the attaclied TECIINICAL RCVIEW MEETING
1~ORM for yoUu• comments. The Division of I3uildiilb aild Plailninb encourages you to
attend this meetinb. "1'lie sponsor and represcntative liave also been invitecl to attend this
iiZectiiig. If }'OU Ci111IlOl 1tte11d, plcase forward tlirce (3) copies oi'your review comments
on the attaclied form to me for the meetins. 1'he attaclied '1'CCI-INICAL REVICW FORMS
will be given to the sponsoi' Zt tlle I1iCet111g 1L1CI 111C1lICICCI IIl Llle DIVIS1011 Of I3tl1Idlllg aIICI
['laniiing tile. Thanlcs for your cooperation. If you have any questions aboul the
applicalion, please coiitact iiie at 456-3675.
NO"fL: Thc llivision of Builcling & Pianning will now bc circul.itiiig cuuimclits for SI?PA
CIICCICIISt :lf tI1C t1I11C Of tCCI1I11C11I l•eview. Tliis will be tlic onty time yoti Nvill be able to
COIlllllCllt 1•cgaccliiig thc STI'A Clicclclist for this pi•ojcct.
c: Maxwell & Sinto L.L.C. c/o 1aiiies A. Wolff, 422 W. Riverside, Suite 1407, Spokane, WA. 99201
nwight J. Hume, 107 S. 1-loward St., Suite 325, Spokanc, WA. 99201
AitflChmeIliS: "('ecllilical Rcview Form, Praject Application, Site Plan, SEf'A Cliecklist
1026 W17ST BROADt4';w A%'(:NUr • SPOhANE, WASHINCTON 992160
['i IONr: (509) 456-3675 • Fnx: (509) 456-4703 I
"T'Dn: (509) 324-3166
~
,...........~1'~t
,W ✓:.e._t'..v •
r: g
Rand 2Ca.e .`I'.eartnirt ~
ea.rmuEtin
1 g
Suite 325 S. 107 Haward St. Spokane, WA. 9920t Phone (509) 456-7402 Fax (509) 456 7357
w ol~-
12-15-97
Greg Figg FILE C :f~ P y
~
WSDOT, Eastern Region
2714 North Mayfair St.
Spokane, Wa. 99207-2090
RE: Rezone Sinto & Houk SR-27. PM. Peak Impact
Dear Greg,
Thank you for reviewing our project and providing the impact
fee assessrnent per the ITE manual and recent trip distributions of
other nearby traffic studies., We have reviewed the same and took
your suggestion to examine our own records of impact to the P.M.
Peak at Pines and I-90. Asy ouu know, o r tenants is an
adjacent neighbor to the subject property and will take over a
majority of our projected 13600 sf of space. That is to say, they will
occupy 6800sf and approximately 1000 sf of the remainder will be
used for support services. Leaving approzimately 5800 sf for other
, tenants. (
To research this data, we solicited the help of their Financial
Manager, who has responded per attached. For obvious reasons, we
are unable to leave this patient information in a public record and
accordingly share it with you via this personal meeting. Our data
reveals the following:
1) Our P.M. Peak is only from 4:(}0 - 5:00 P.M..
2) There are no patients scheduled for
Fridays, ihus limiting the Peak to Monday-
Thursday.
3) According to a random sampling, the
average P.M. scheduling is 10-11 patients.,
say 11.
4) Another random sampling of 1.5 % of the
patients, indicates 43 % may use the freeway
if they come directly from home. This is based
on address records. Of this 43%, (56 patients),
it is reasonable to assume that those living
. ,
. ,
. .
~
. out of town beyond, Post Falls, Couer D' Alene
~ Rathdrum etc. would schedule their
appointment for earlier in the day, to allow
other shopping and/or departure for an early
evening return to their home town. Thus, we
reduce the above figure by another 17
patients and have only 30% using the
freeway, presumably during a P.M. schedule
rather than other times of the day.
5) Accordingly we have a P.M. generation of
11 patients per P.M.Peak Mon-Thur and 30%
of those 11 (3.3) use the freeway.
6) 3.3 x's $181.00 = $597.30
However, the balance of space (5800 sfl is calculated at
ITE rates for unspecified medical use and this figure is calculated as
the remaining percentage of the whole x's 55 or 23.65 trips. 23.65 x's
60% = 14.19 trips. 14.19 trips x's $181.00 =$2568.39 .
• One other point of clarification is needed. This medical practice
is moving into 6800 sf from a combination of 2600 sf plus occasional
, use of an adjacent surgeons space of 1200 sf. So, for all intents and
purposes they are moving from 3800 sf to 6800 sf and not
expanding their staff. The eztra space is to be used to provide larger
exam rooms and storage, plus space for employee's to have lunch,
etc.. Currently, they have no amenities as such.
With regard to employee counts, there are numerous part-time
employees and they have variable shifts, as do the doctors. The best
estimate of how many employees are there at the close of day is 14.
Here again, we have a majority commuting to the valley and I would
estimate that only 30% of these 14 use the freeway as well. Hence, it
is conceivable that there would be a combined total of 3.3 patients +
4.2 for a total of 7.5 trips to I-90. Adding the above remaining 14.19
gives us (14.19 + 3.3 + 4.2 = 21.69 trips/P.M.peak). 21.69 x's 181 =
$3925.89 total impact fee. Please let me know if you concur. I
have submitted the rezone to the county and you should be getting
notice of this in process. I would expect a design review meeting
shortly after the first of the year. This matter should be addressed
and concluded before that time.
r4R4espetfull ~it d,
H ~
PAGE 1 • 10:08:05 05 JAN 1998
Road# Road Names....:...'. MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
02996 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 LILY RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
MAXWELL AV 00.050 GIR.P,RD CT (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.140 BOWMAN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
02997 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 PARK RD U 19 PAVED 36
MAXWELL AV 00.110 CENTER RD U 19 PAVED 36
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.230 ELLA RD U 19 PAVED 36
02998 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 BOEING RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
MAXWELL AV 00.060 FARR RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
00.080 FARR RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.110 SUNDERLAND RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 32
03001 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO WILBER R U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
MAXWELL AV 00.060 WILBUR RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.440 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 36
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.560 HOUK RD U 19 PAVED 36
03002 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO WOODLAWN U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV 00.060 WOODLAWN RD U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.180 MCDONALD RD U 19 PAVED 40
03192 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV 00.200 GLENN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.260 PIERCE RD U 19 PAVED 40
03217 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 ALADDIN RD U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV 00.050 CAVALIER CT (END) U 19 PAVED 40
00.100 CAUFIELD CT (END) U 19 PAVED 40
00.150 COLONIAL CT (END) U 19 PAVED 40
00.210 MEYERS CT (END) U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.260 HOLL RD U 19 PAVED 40
03223 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 LONG RD U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV 00.080 ARTIES CT (END) & AR U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.170 EAST END OF ROAD
03232 MP,XWELL AV (START) 00.000 HOMESTEAD DR R 09 PAVED 44
MAXWELL AV 00.050 MADSON ST (END) R 09 PAVED 44
00.080 EAST END OF ROAD (EN R 09 PAVED 44
00.170 WRIGHT BLVD. (END)
00.300 MITCHELL (NONESTABLI
00.340 MOLTER RD
03000 MAXWELL AV (STAR.T) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.120 BOWDISH RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
03003 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 GREENACRES RD U 19 PAVED 18
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.240 BARKER RD U 19 PAVED 18
03191 MAXWELL AV (START) 00.000 OBERLIN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
MAXWELL AV (END) 00.080 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 40
02999 MAXWELL AVE (START) 00.000 WEST END TO ARC ST U 19 PAVED 36 ~
MAXWELL AVE 00.030 ARC ST (START) U 19 PAVED 36
MAXWELL AVE (END) 00.060 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
13 Records Processed
PAGE 1 10:08:24 05 JAN 1998
Road# Road Names........ MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
04484 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 PARK RD U 19 PAVED 36
SINTO AV 00.120 CENTER RD U 19 PAVED 36
SINTO AV (END) 00.250 ELLA RD (START) U 19 PAVED 36
04485 SINTO AV 00.080 DICK RD U 19 PAVED 40
00.140 LEWIS RD U 19 PAVED 40
00.200 VISTA RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.260 MESA RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.330 BESSIE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.390 LAUR.A RD ( START ) U 19 L I GHT B I TUM . 20
00.450 SARGENT RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.580 MARGUERITE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
00.710 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 19 PAVED 40
00.770 MULLAN RD (ONE WAY N U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
00.800 STOUT RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
00.960 LOCUST RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SINTO AV (END) 01.020 BOEING RD
SINTO AVE XX.XXX ELTON RD (START)
04488 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO OBERLIN U 19 PAVED 40
SINTO AV 00.120 OBERLIN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
SINTO AV (END) 00.220 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 40
04489 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO WILBER R U 19 GR.ADED/DRAINED 16
SINTO AV 00.060 WILBUR RD U 19 GRADED/DR.AINED 14
SINTO AV (END) 00.120 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 GRADED/DR.AINED 14
04564 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO WOODLAWN U 19 PAVED 40
SINTO AV 00.060 WOODLAWN RD U 19 PAVED 36
SINTO AV (END) 00.180 MCDONALD RD U 19 PAVED 30
04671 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 19 GRAVEL 30
SINTO AV 00.040 BOLIVAR RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
00.110 BANNEN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
SINTO AV (END) 00.150 BEST RD U 19 PAVED 40
04712 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 MADSON ST R 09 PAVED 36
SINTO AV 00.090 ETTA CT (END) R 09 PAVED 36
SINTO AV (END) 00.150 WRIGHT BLVD & SINTO R 09 PAVED 36
04482 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
SINTO AV (END) 00.040 BOWMAN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
04487 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 SUNDERLAND RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16
SINTO AV (END) 00.060 WOODRUFF RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16
04490 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 36
SINTO AV (END) 00.120 HOUK RD (START) U 19 PAVED 36
04491 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 GREENACRES RD U 19 PAVED 18
SINTO AV (END) 00.240 BARKER RD U 19 PAVED 18
04705 SINTO AV (START) 00.000 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 19 PAVED 36
SINTO AV (END) 00.070 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
04713 SINTO CT (START) 00.000 SINTO AV (END) & WRI R 09 PAVED 36
SINTO CT (END) 00.040 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
13 Records Processed
PAGE 1 ' 10:08:47 05 JAN 1998
Road# Road Names.......... . MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
01919 HOUK AV (START) 00.000 SHANNON AV (START) U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK AV (END) 00.110 MANSFIELD AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40
01898 HOUK CT (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK CT (END) 00.040 26TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
01830 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 VERCLER RD U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD 00.080 COLLINS RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD (END) 00.220 SALTESE AV U 19 PAVED 40
01831 HOUK RD ( START ) 00.000 14 TH AV ( END ) U 19 PAVED 30
HOUK RD 00.120 12TH AV U 19 GR.AVEL 14
HOUK RD (END) 00.370 8TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
01833 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END OF R4AD U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD 00.030 6TH AVE U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD (END) 00.120 4TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
01835 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 SPR.AGUE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
HOUK RD 00.080 RIVERSIDE AV (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
HOUK RD (END) 00.120 MAIN AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01879 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 SINTO AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD 00.060 MAXWELL AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD (END) 00.140 MISSION AV
01832 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 8TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK RD ( END ) 00.090 7 TH AV ( S TART ) U 19 PAVED 40
01834 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 1ST AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30
HOUK RD (END) 00.100 SPRAGUE AV
01893 HOUK RD (START) 00.000 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 35
00.100 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 35
01894 HOUK ST (START) 00.000 25TH AV (START) U 19 PAVED 40
HOUK ST (END) 00.070 24TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
11 Records Processed
Traffic Counts I
Road Name............'....'. Location Leg Count...
MISSION AV at PARK RD E 2711
MISSION AV at PARK RD W 3342
MISSION AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH E 9167
MISSION AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH W 8738
MISSION AV at MULLAN RD (ONE WAY NORTH) E 12012
MISSION AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 10319
MISSION AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 9338
MISSION AV at BOWDISH RD E 12031
MISSION AV at BOWDISH RD W 8712
MISSION AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) E 15135
MISSION AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) W 9669
MISSION AV at MCDONALD RD (END) E 10765
MISSION AV at MCDONALD RD (END) W 12914
MISSION AV at EVERGREEN RD (END) E 7466
MISSION AV at EVERGREEN RD (END) W 8597
MISSION AV at ADAMS RD (END) E 8789
MISSION AV at ADAMS RD (END) W 7917
MISSION AV at FLORA RD E 1621
MISSION AV at FLORA RD W 108
MISSION AV at BARKER RD E 1932
MISSION AV at BARKER RD W 2705
MISSION AV at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) E 620
MISSION AV at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) W 1985
MISSION AV (END) at SULLIVAN RD W 6737
M I S S I ON AV ( END ) a t HARVARD RD ( S TART ) W 339
M I S S I ON AV ( S TART ) a t FANCHER FRONTAGE RD ( END ) E 1541
MISSION AV (START) at VISTA RD (END) E 2891
MISSION AV (START) at COUNTRY VISTA DR N 1624
MISSION RD at RR TRACKS E 2
MISSION RD (END) at GROVE RD W 56
MISSION RD (START) at WOOD RD E 27
. ,
I
Spolcanc County
Division of Building & Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: January 15, 1998 @ 1:15 p.m.
Project rile No.: ZE-61-97
Project Location: Generally located south of Maxwell Avenue, north of Sinto
Avenue, west of Houk Street and approximately 400 feet east of Pines Road in the
NW '/4 of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA)
Project Description: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for a medical
office building.
Parcel No(s): 45152.0801, .0802, .0803, .0804
Applicant(s): Maxwell & Sinto L.L.C. c/o James A. Wolf, 422 W. Riverside,
Sliite 14075 Spokane, WA. 99206, (509) 625-2161
Agent(s): Dwight J. Hume, 107 S. Howard St., Suite 325, Spokane, WA. 99201,
(509) 456-7402
Project Planner: Tammy Jones '
, - . OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR-ZONES
T6: ~pokane (ouniy Building and Plannitig De artme t
FROM: Division of En ~neering & Roads
~
DATE: March 10, 1998
PROJECT: UR-3.5 & UR-22 TO UR-22
FILE ZE-0061-97 / )
Hearing Date: rr~ #
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant: TAMVIY JONES
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: TAMMY JONES
TechnicaUReview Date: (O 1/ 15/ 1998 @ 1:15 )
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
"Findings of Fact, Conclusions aild Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
l. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer
sidewalk, drainage and access plans.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. Road improvements and curb were installed on Maxwell Avenue, Sinto
Avenue and Houk Road per RID #419. Prior to the release of a building
permit sidewalk shall be constructed along Maxwell Avenue, Sinto
Avenue and Houk Road
CC: Applicant DWIGHT J HUME (MAXWELL & SINTO LLC)
Engineer/Surveyor -
Planner TAMMY JONES
?age 2 of 2
~1 f-15'/1998 a ~
0~,E-0061-97
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
9. Al1 required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
10. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
.
. , ~
. '
SPOKANE CnUNfiY DIVISI4N OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
Z4NC RECLASSIFICATION APPLICAT(ON
PARTI
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
LegalOwner Maxwell & Sinto L.L.C. C/0 James A. Wolff
Mailing Address 422 W• Riverside Suite 1 407
City Spokane State Wa • Zip Code 99201 - 0 3 9 7
Phone 6 2 4- 21 61 (Work) • ({-lome) Fax 6 2 3-1 1 8 6
App+teermtlAgent Dwight J. Hume
Mailing Address Suite 325 107 S. Howard St.
City Spokane State Wa • Zip Code 99201
SERVE AS REPRESENTATiVF
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) 6 2 4 8 0 s f (1.43 a c r e s)
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft.) None
Ass(-ssor's parcel numbers of project/proposal 4 51 5 2 0 8 01 , 0802, 0803, 0804
narcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled None
Streei address of proposal 1409 N. Houk, 1 2 4 2 2 E. Maxwe 11 e tc .
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR - 2 2 (1995) UR 3. 5 (1955)
Existing use of property Residential and vacant
Proposed zoning UR-22 for Of f ice
Comprehensive plan category Jirha n School district CV #3 5 6
Water purveyor Modern Fire district Fn# 1
f'roposed use of property:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Busin s Industrial Mixed use
Other - Describe medical o~pice use
List previous planning division actions involving this property JZE-2 - 9 5, ZE-9 9- 5 5
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
Location of proposal RPtt,~pPp Maxw 11 & Sinto, West of_ Houk
Section 1 r~ Township 25 Range 4 4
Name of p«blic road(s) providing ciccess LIgllk, Maxwell & Sinto via
Pines P.d, and A7ission
Widlh of property fronting on public road 2 8 4' Houk ; 2 20 ' S i n to a nd Maxwe 11
. ~
ZONE RECLASSIFICP.TIOK.,PPLICATION PaGE 2 of 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes (X~ No
*Indirect access to Pznes and Mission
Name(s) of arterial roads
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposeci
See Attached
Existing zone(s) UR - 2 2; UR 3. 5 to proposed zone(s) UR- 2 2
for the foliowing described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor,,~
r
to the property, what is your interest in it?
Wfiat are tlie changed conditions of the area which you feef make this proposal warranted?
J
Wfiat impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on tfie adjacent properties?
See Attached
What factors support the zone reclassification?
See Attached
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
See Attached
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICAtION 'r-\?PLICATION PAGE 3 of 4
PART II
This section of the application will provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified.
Resu(ts of the preliminary consultation shafl be incorporated in the proposal before final sLibmittal
to the Division.
FIRE MARSHALUFIRE DlSTRICT
A. This proposal is within Fire Protection Disirict No. ~
B. Adequate arrangements (UawS) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes.
C. Recommended fire flow ; or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive; and will be determined at time of building permit application.
D. Requirements include
Sc_PP k CA~
Fire District Signature/Title Date
WA -1 ER PURVEYOR
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements
been made.
B. Requirements/comments 4 ~r►'I,l.i-~-~ JA-e
~
,n
- ~
Water District 'Signatureffitle Date
~
COUNTY ENGINEER
\ preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have
i)een discussed with the applicant.
A. Comments
~ '
10
Signature/TN'-f Dat
,
COUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for submittal of tllis proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is
A. Comments 5
~-7
Signature/Title I-ol Date
REGIONAL HEALTH DlSTRICT
A preliminary discussian has taken place and general requirements far submittal of tfiis proposal
(have) (have not) been satisfied.
A. Comments ~ev.~•~,~ s ~t/`• ~
'0a / Z .Z ~Lz7
Signature/Titlc ~ Date ~
SEWER PURVEYOR
A preliminary discussion has taken place and general requirements for the provision of public
sewer are understood by the applicant.
A. Comments 7,~~STtG ~,00 CJ/U T-`f, -:5 9/3 725,1,1
Signature/Title ~ • Date
I
. ' ' .
ZONE RECLASSIFICAT!ON r1RPLICATION PAGE 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, tfie undersigned, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the information requested for the
zoning map and written legal description
~21 ~ R7
Signed Date
~58- Address ~ 0 I ~lPhone ONO
' City ~ 70 ~Gf I~ Q State Zip J~2-0L~
G
PART IV
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfuily and to the best of my knowiedge.
I further swear or affirm that ! am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previousl;,r
identified land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewith is written permission from
owner a1=(5( tions on his/her behalf.
Signed • ~ rs-~ Date
Address s-7 ~ • S • ~ Phone ~ ~-i 62 ~ 2' ~ 6 (
City State Zip
~
L 1 g.~?
oi n re of a i ant or s ntati Date '
4ft>
State of Washington )
) ss:
County of Spokane )
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on this ~ day of , 19
by JAkXn A . W O ~f
P!otary Seal
Z E N A M. M 0 RT 0 N N ary Public in and for the State of Washington residing
sTaTE oF waSHINGTON at
NOTARY PUBLIC My app intment expires
WY CODUISSION EXPIRES 10-K-1_
- .
PART V
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUILDiNG AND PLANNtNG
Date submitted File number
Date accepted By
Total fees Receipt number
MHEI HEi(ir.E APP. KJ5 4 9'
t.egal Description
Maxwell & Sinto L.L.C.
Lots 1-3, Block 2, Mission View Addition as recorded in Book "T" of
Plats, page 27. Records of Spokane County, Washington.
,
CAZ
G ,
• ~ ~ ~
• ~ ;
, . ~
0~, ~ 31 ~ G •
•:':-tliSiL•;~.@0 •~,v~
.
EXPIRES 12/7/ ~
.
IZ
. .
. ,
. .
SPOKaNE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PAK1- !
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
LegalOwner Maxwell & Sinto L.L.C. C/O James A. Wolff
Mailing Address 422 W• Riverside Suite 1 407
City Spokane State wa • Zip Code 9 9 2 01 - 0 3 9 7
Phone 6 2 4- 21 61 (Work) (Home) Fax 6 2 3-1 1 8 6
App4eent/Agent Dwight J. Hume
Mailing Address Suite 325 107 S. Howard St.
City Spokane State Wa • Zip Code 99201
Phone 456-7402 (Work) (Home) Fax 456-7357
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) 6 2 4 8 0 s f (1.43 acre s)
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft.) None
Assessor's parcel numbers of project/proposal 45152 0 8 01 , 0802, 0803F 0804
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled None
Street address of proposal 1409 N. Houk, 1 2 4 2 2 E. Maxwe 11 etc.
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR- 2 2 (1995) UR 3. 5 (1955)
Existing use of property Residential and vacant
Proposed zoning UR-22 for Of f ice
Comprehensive plan category i?rha n School district CV # 3 5 6
Water purveyor Modern Fire district FD# 1
Proposed use of property:
Single family dwellings O Duplexes O Multifamily dwe'
Manufactured homes O Busin s O Industrial O Mixed u-
Other O- Describe medical o~~ice use
List previous planning div:si,-~
B. LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
Location of proposal RPt-_wPen Maxwel~ & Sinto, West of Houk
Section 1 c~ Township 2.5 Range 44
Name of public road(s) providing access Houk, Maxwell & Sinto via
Pines Rd. and Mission
Width of property fronting on public road 2 8 4' Houk ; 2 2 0' S i nto and Maxwe 11
. ,
ZONE RECLASGIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 2 of 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes (X~ No
*Indirect access to Pines and Mission
Name(s) of arterial roads
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposeci
See Attached
Existing zone(s) UR - 2 2; UR 3. 5 to proposed zone(s) UR- 2 2
for the following described property.
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below.
. See Attached
IIf you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it?
Agent for Owners
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
3
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
See Attached
What factors support the zone reclassification?
S~ e Attac~~--d
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
See Attached
_ J
• .
F • 4i
ZQNE RECLASSIFIC`ATIt]hl APPLIeATION PAGE 3 of 4
P►aRT 11
This section Qf the applica#ovrt wilf provide #he aivisian nf Building and PCanning staff with written
verificatian that the applicant has had prelirninary consultation with the agencies identified.
Results of the prefiminary consultatian shalf be incorporated in the propvsal before frnaf submit#ap
to the Qivisiori.
FIRE IIIIARSHALLIFIRE DISTRICT
A. This proposal is within Fire PratectRan District No. ~
S. Adequaie arrangemen#s (*wm) (have not) been made to meet aur needs in providing far an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protectioin purposes.
C. Recarrlmended fire flaw or unable to calculate now because use is na#
definitive; and wiIl be determined at #ime of building permit application.
D, Requirements include
'~L~ 021,1~ lo ~'r~l 1 ~ F~ " ~t 7
Fire District Signature/Title Date
VIdATEfZ PURVEYOFt,
A. Satisfactory arrangements for domestic water and fire flow requirements Owwe~ (have not)
been made.
B. Requirementslcomments
! 1 ~i
c2 ' e
Water District Sign turelTitle Date
COiL1N7Y ENGiNEER
A preiimin,ary discussion has taken place and general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed wEth the applicant.
A. Comments
~
. A` x a ~
SignaturelTie~'- j Dat
CC]UNTY L171L171ES
A preiiminary discussion has taken place and generaE requirements for submit#aI of this proposal
(have) (haue n4t) been satisfied. The designated water purveyor for this site is
A. Commen4s Signature/Title Date
REGIDNAL HEALTH [31STRIGT
A preliminary discussevn has taken pEace and general requirements for submittal of this propQSal
{harre} (have nvt) been satisfied.
A. Commertts
Signature/Title Date
SEWER PURVEYC?R
A preliminary discussion has taken pface artd general requirements far the pravision Qfi public
r
sewer are understnod by the applicant. A. Comments
Signature/Title date
. •
.
+ r' ~ t
Z{1NE RECLASSIFfqAT{CDN APPLICATl4N M ~ PAGE 4 of 4
PART I I I
SURVEYQR VERIFfCATIt]N
I, the undersigned, a ricensed land surveyor, have campfeted the informativn requested for the
zaning map and wretten legal description
",J Date r ~
Signed f q7
Address ~701 Vv , 1 4W. Phone
C'rty f; o ko Yi e ~ Sta#e IIV 4- zip lq:~0L~
PaR`r IV
SIGNATURE QF PROPERTY OWNERS C3R LETTER OF AUTHC3RIZATION
I, the undersigned, sv+rear ar affirm under penalty of perjury that the abave.responses are made
truthfu[ly and ta the bes# of my knowiedge.
• I further swear ar affrm that I am the owner of record of the area prvposed fvr #he previously
identified land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewith is written permissian from the
Qwner auth rizing my actions on hislher behalf.
Signed CA • ~ fk~ Date l ~ V017
ck"
A,ddress 0,,5. 66
~ Phane ~ 6s~
City+ . State VA Zip
~
Si n re of a ~ ant or p,(ps?ntatDate
"-D
State of IIIJashingtvn )
} ss:
Caunty of Spokane }
Signed and sworn ar affrmed befvre me an this ~ day of 19 s~ [4
by t~A+Un A. WO L-P,(-
f`lota Seal
Z~N A M. M 0 R T ON 4hpary PubCic ~in and fvr the State of Washington residing
STdTE QF WASHINGTON at IkOz
N4TARY PUBLIC My app intment expires ms C~ 1
IIY COuyISS10N EXPIRES
PART V
TO BE CDMPLETED BY THE DIUISfON OF BUILQING AND PLANNING
Date submitted File numbet
C3ate accepted By
Total fees Recelpt number
a
PREI REZpNE APPL KS5 ~97
J
,
RECE I `r'I' SliMMAI2Y
~ ~ .
'I'RANSACTION PlUMBER: T9702070 UATE: 12/29/97
APPLICANT: MAXWELL & SINTO LLC PHONE=
ADDRESS : 922 W RIVERSIDE AVE 1,107
SPOKANE WA 99201
CONTRCT NAME„ MAXWELL & SINTO LLC -
TRANSACTION: RE-ZONE (ENGINEERS & UTILITIES
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) ;
4) 5) FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONI14G PERMIT 1 200.00
100.00
300.00
;o'1tiL rA.iL- 300.00
L~4.LANCE OWIIVG= .00
I= ~:'i M E N I' DAiE ItECE I PT ii CHECK# PRYMLidT AMOUNT
12/29/97 00013397 1019 300.00
PRCCESSED BY: nIENDEL, GLURIA
PRIrJTED BY: 1ENDEL, GLORIA
*********~+*~~k~**#**,**r~**+*t* TII~i1K YOU **~►:~t*~*~*~+~,****x******+*****~***
~
, .
R
+ PERNIIT CENTERSASTVASSPORT
. ,
NumbeT:
Date:
,
Name ~ Phone
Aaaress
coma►ents:
CUSTOMER ROUTING 3>~ ~ ~ ~c-I -
~ ` . Divislon~ofBnildL~i~~&Plannin~;- _ _ . . ; ~ ,..,~~1"s[aa►~i~n~niesln~: ,,.~LL~~ nnri:~
F--j Addressing Pcrmit Review Appx+oach Perntit
Q Building Perrrrit Shorelines Info. Flood Plain Permit
a Code Informatian Short Plat info. Public/Private Roads
a Carrmxrcisl Review Subdivision info. Res. Bldg Perrrrit Rev.
a Canfer+ence Temp. Use Perntit Site Diainage lnfo.
a Fin Safery Review Varisrict ApQI. Subdivision Review
~ Manufacwrcd Home Zone C'heck Utility Permit
2 a-T) cti
~ Mechanical Permits Zone Info. Zone Change Rcview
~ Li
Plumbin8 Permits "
Q M ~
F-I PrivaM Rnad Info. NO FEE :REQUIRED
e ~ Time Out
' ~ia~~aa ~c-~ ~ Nf 3c)1
~ .
F-1 sewer Pcrmits 'Di~i+ision`o~`Utlliti~s=:
o Infa,,mtio, 5ubd;vi5;on Review
a Admin. Fxception ULID/Sewer [nfo.
~ Binding Site Plan Info I~Chan8'e Review
~ Ccrt. Of Exemption
~ Costtpmhensivc Plan NO FEE REQUIRBD
Reviewer Time Out
Cand. Use Permit
F~ Critical Areas Info. ~ ~ ~ . . Healtb'Dishict
FiNanconfmming Use
NO FEE REQUIRED NO FEE REQUIRED
Rrviewor Time Out Reviewer Time Out, R,oviewer Time Out
I ~ ~
. ~
. .
. r.
PERMIT CENTER EAST FEE SCHEDULE ~~~~~~~n~:~~~~~:
~F'..:R`_.. A.~
:
. . . : , .
.
l~ ~4 r1~ . ~C3~:#:::::.
SEOI # UNITS ICOST I DESCRIPTION OF WORK
281 S
58 erb 'fi
cate of Excmtion
P
~C ro-l
978
P
~
.
29 S87 ~ I Between 5& 10 Acros
.
30 , S87 I iMinor Lot Line Adinstmwt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
31 ~ S76 1 ~ All Others COMMENTS
79 S58 IConditional Use Pcrmits - Renewal ~ Ap BUILDING A PIr1NNING
80 5397 Conditional Use Permits ~ A!1
B36 S75 Environmentai Checklist ~
60 ~ S70 Home Pmfession Permit ~
137 S35 Pro-Confcrence Foe - Condi6onal Use, ITemporary Use, Variance
61 5262 lTemporary Use Permit
731 5621 JV~q,anff. -.gefon or After cpn~trucy9~ ~
:•3 ~ . . . . . . .
t~ . .
~ . . .
:P .
ENCINEER,
~ . . . . ti :;::r:::•:•••:•: . . . . . S
S30 Administrative Variance E01
E02) S50 ~~Is
~
.
t .
~s .
.
E05 SSO ChanRc of Conditions Piat
E06 SSO
E07 SSO lCoodidona! l
E26 S30 lDesign Devia;
E24 S75 EqyYQq.
TeptW Checklist
i .
.
.
~
-
o~: :
. :0- "4:
.
~
~
~
. . . .
.
:~~b . . . .
. .
.
.
. rparc,
i~ .E10 S200 iminary Bindint~ Site Plan
E11 S200 lPrdiminary Plats LonQ
E12 5100 Short
E23 $100 Final
~
. . . . S~ .
. . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . .
-r~.P. ~
. a~ ~i~:': ::t:::.: :
a#:~ Y:: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E 15 SSO... , V luttaTlCy . UTILITIES
. t..-.~:~. .
LVoi~c. 9'~~.
. . . . . . . . iK3tli ou~ :P.~~~~~~~`~~~:~:~~~:~:~:~~~~~:::~:::::=~~~~:~:~`:::_:::.:: `
eftiC. . . . .
E17 S20Q ?.aning Pcrmit
E25 S10 NSF CharAe
E28 IMisc. Road Fund (S Amt)
1. . S~Qi1F~~ FS25 '::===:~c=~?c~c~~~~~c~i-~~'=c=i==::=c:;:i-~::`c`i:::::c`:=::c::=c:c:c`i::~~:;~::~:~:::~cc:::~:;:;:;:':':~:~~;:~~~:i:~:'•:~:~:~~~:
U01 Pt~oninR Actions Within the PSSA
U02 PlaeninR Actions Ouuide the PSSA ~
MAstFwrAssroa42ac (tAn»
~
SEC iS,T. 25.N., R.44 E.W, M. -
$CA'_E. ! ~s 4Vd
' ++v
~ o l
G..rd.f+ I NS'7Li'1
atl .
1 • j ry.~ j 1 CS 1 1
.ce.s,
Sec Cor 93-zee = '~v:-~
. +v ! yn1 1 ~ R 'A`7 ~ C.R
/ f P494tp _ »4~pI""_'.
~J_1A-1-~
' _ _ _ _ • « ^i ~ M 1 •ar Vt~' ~ yr
+ n
i x I a ~ I' 3 ~.~`L Y` r i ~ ~1 . ~v nh`. Iij
V~f l~l. ~ • ~ ~ °T -
"r►'r"' ~ µ z ~ i ~ C. ri- ' , I , . ~ l i ~ ~ . ~y ~ ~ ~
~ i Na ~ i~`nS~tr'fs . ~ ♦ s i
a IIw _ ~ - '
+ ' s~ x ~ ' ~ ♦ pd~ i
` 0a
IEIX7Nl. AYi kt -'Otfi-Afi • r'e " ~^=n„►. I ~y ~ ! 4~' ^ r I }I~f~.I~ ~ ~L-'' cr
^ I~j r . IZ ~`GLA~lifd Nf •l _ _~f . f I ~ rl u.v e~~ ~ 1 ry` ~~~n.~
. J I • cri y Iya # ' 1 -z.,,. ~
~fl' ~ ifL~lY4 S'~ T~ ~a `~'I ,a~+?1 , r. s r .i.~~lne ~r~ 'p~i~('~j~y..~tl'1~
C ~ W
r b•+n'~.."M
`Uf
- . y .r r ,T~,s~ a„ q tei
L ar ~yI r ~ ~ ~ ~L
41
Y~ , ~ a -
"
` 1
+ - s6 !I~'~'
I 1 "C`! ~ . ,.s r ' f
t. wr rv~.ID o• :
~r , ra
i~
i r
. ~•y i ~ 6 tl
~.,p~~ ~
~Gar ta.n~ 4 A$
a NOA, 4t ' . . . _ . ~~.w... - _ - ~ -
r . Lq.~ • - ` ' y_~` .5
4aS"`° C.t1..P. 1950 ,f" J.
W! ~r+} r~ ~r-~2 lax;.~e, «k,7 4a ~A V-'.r r'x'j i.4°f .1.~
fl. I-
~ S64G' ~ ; r
~
' r
~ ' I' ° Lr ~r° -4t ~.,f~_s ~ ~ . '1'` • -
~
e+L`""~E
p • i ^.`•4 RIWRrw ~rl Ic•I v' IN1`~eMS.c~ tl(°; F-Q
~ ~ . ,u. .~:..•g . I : i d • , j ~ ,t ~ " s
+:i
,
~ ~ ~ ~ i~-• • ~ qo - ~ f ` •
d . . . ~ ~ r
.~~I v~. 1 . ~r ~ I N'. ~zo~.-so' $ i ~~..~•+.f....+:.~.r °i ``~.~L t:.
° ~ w- ~ 4J ~F'IZ T ~ r
Tlvm
~ }J,.¢ • i^~.-. . I~ ~u v y~...
: ~ ~ ~ , s ; - ,4c:..~, ~ ' s • l ' y~ r~~
t24r;i~ s .
' _ ; I`-~ c~ z ~ ` ,~g7 r ~y ' I ~ • ~ ~ :
~ ~ ~'~l~L~cL7. 4 ~ 4 a J ' - ~ d e +1a ~i w+r.. _a ~ ~ C
+w.~ . Me.i74_r-iC~• .Is M
IS I Li
~~~'-~'t _ l c ~ Y:~., ~ ~ ~ x . r.nr'~ r .w.c~ , `~•:.r1 ~'S , ~ ~ r n i ; I{;- I `.~,r ~ r 'i
' - • e ~ ~a -A.-,.'! le r..4J ^ ~4 s ~ :1",. a : ~ • ~ , LL R i*. . ` ; es ~1 ~ ~ ~
lT=~{{`
• , w-~..~ h~„y ~ . • 7 t 5 ~ i $ 4 • o a . . r ~ "ie Y 2 z
it " V L.a.a
. .
E ~ , e f+ E s~+' ~ u n~ - r i w'- I +
P171:~r
1 W~'+ L L T
" -x-~--~`` ~ ~ ~`ah3- - ~
PRAG_~.~.._' Alt1!
} a
SiOK~/J C.OUMTY ~ ~ 0 1o 2~,~
' PV
~R P rr
C
d ry $i~ J r^-~ eu R^
F I w 1
i[ ~ I E
'
~ 0 7 ~+nrd ~ C J ~ C.'J
VO~
a o
tib ye si~
" aa °a
a,c
@ 'A t
(
, DarE ~ o~sG'R.!OT.'Q!t I pr ~
G-r3- 72 7rreS 3ECrto" aECrsaaverb FaO~r LI~reu tO wrY~.wti.
ws..w.•r~ °.►no~...~, cee~~i~c~...f Z pwcau~kar.,*
I ~
wa -c:
. . .~r+woen 71~0 y, .
~
~
~
I
45152.07 318 45152.0 711
45 152.0707 45 152.0"02
i 45152.0'.70 ~
45 52.0703
45152.0709 45 152.0 , 04
~ . 1
1
52. 152.0605
well
~ .
45 [-S 2.0810
2.0812 45152.0~01
45 "52.0
45152.0807 -
OS 15 52.0803
451 04
45 :52.0~02
.08 s
45 152.09 14
45152.090 ~
Nouce: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference
use only. Legal documents should be obtained irom the appropriate agency.
W s a r.sw oK +
- 97A. tt9b
Cl/W fIM/ i
_ _ _ ' - - _ _ + I I T" I 1 1( ~
' 20 " ~O' ~ i' ~ 7.6' - - - bA AA
I 9TA. f ' ' J . . ' ~ r a ~7 • - ~ S V3" 4 { s
I 64A~G ~[.G~ a I~(?~~'L~ G~Aq~ I ~ 2Q44.qo ~ f j 0.17' A.~.K~ ~ ~ r ,
GLA9S "~'j' r . ~ . . , . . . r . , . ~ • 'I.':.'.'.
2.9'~ 2.5'a' I'f. aTA.'b+b6
GRASSECJ ~ I~ttCtx.ATION A12EA
IJOT~~ NCk1K t24At7 TfK~E "',4, O.'~3~ G.S:~.C.. 31q~WA1-K OIJ
cunr~ 1-IauK n17. ~.z. s~t~ oF
SIh1To AvE, ~cw~ ~n. ok~.~r
4 ~e„ , - x`
~ +
~ ~ . ,.s~ . : : , . ~ . . . , t: . . . ~ . ;
r~. soaa.ao ~ i M F..I 18h a.sal~.~s 1
~ae~.is , b.. . ~~L-----. . _ . . _ _ '~z
0.~ 2004.65 . . . . , . . CU~L~S WLET
Sh~ClAL tUnl3 INLET 6lITTECt GUTTE12 17EPt2ES?i1014 DETAIL
sEC~'~or~ aA, n.rw ~ a~w
2~~ ~ z6'
~s~ ia' ~ k
~ 6• ~ sPF-caa,L CuaFS ~ ~ 1 NLE'T COu'Ett
a.17' a.c.p. 5l.op~ 57~uC7u~E M pROFILE ~ . . . CL,A55 f3 ~ GI1AqE ~ _ . . . . . . . . ~r•.~ , . . . . . : i :f•::.,._ VTOP OF CUC218 I . : . - : : r: l ~
: ~ • , ~-Gt~Oll"f JOItJ~ ~ Joti~ ~ f
. • ~ r 4 z.'18 l. 2,78 % . . ~r,~ ~ ~ ,r ~ . ~ • . . . . . , . . . • . . . . . . . . . r ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ . ,1 ~ . . . . . . . . . . ; , ' . . . . . . . , . . ~ , ~ ~ f ~ 3 r„ j ti ,
~L Nar~= ~ ~-z+h'~ ` J , _ i ~ - ~~4" 12,.~
cu~~ is ~x~s~. ~r ~ . . L~ ~ ~J~ ~E Q.*J3~ ~Y~ ~A~ ` , ~G~. i ~~1~ A~ ~1 ~ -
, r,` ~ J..`.., r.'..,...~ .l. ~d~. .t•~4l. ~ , . . , ;4~ ~ , ~ . `4 r. , . . , 4 r~ . ~ ~ . . , . . ~ ~ - ~ . ~ F110M SiA O+AO . , E. . a. . , " , ~o srta 2+Qa M+AXWEL V ~ ~ cc.,M 7•~
L A E. ~ROI!'~ JOf N~" JOf Nfi LINE ; - 1
I~ - - - J1 ~ A .
A ~ ~ C ' t -
. ' ~ ;
~
- ~ ~ - _
p~AN Vi~w 4 _ ~ 7El3 laifc.CE'3 Q►G -
25 I~I~CES ALL E! ,~Of ~ 12~1aAl~ ~U: A12 ALL £ND9 1L4 " " 4 12 ~P.t2 ` UAVILS EYCEPT p,.ACEn a~ SVAU I
' y5' „ . . . . . lUP O • ~ ~ , . Gi11~tb 1bP aF FAC ,f, Cl?Cttb L~1b ~
• ~fJ1'i~M SEC'f10N , i 29' Pl2EGAST Qt~ C~T ' P ~
- IN pLAGE. i 1 . . , . . . ~ . " ~ I . . . . . . . - ~ V.+4GtrE5 S' 7C~ !2' PfiECAS~' S4lALL I~~.~'`.``. ~ . . . . . . LL.: • • • - ~ 10, 101' 10" 10r lo" 3" ~i
i . 12Eq111~.E t1E1►1Fat1CEIHEl~it ' 1~/~"~~.: 3 10 . ~ ~ - ~
Np VIE I~Vq ~ ~ ~ ~1'~~~ r W
vaa~ES ' E2E~3At2 ~2E1NFOt~GEMENT ' ~ 1" ~
pL.A+C.~MEN`~' A5 pE.Ct ~ ~ 1 - Dd ~
TY E".• 0.'~9' C.$.T.C. Il~L~"C C+C~ECl p4.,AN V1EW , i~ A ~U@ I°~ . ; Q1 M b 14
NOTE~ o.f?' A.C,p. , j , C.~t2~ IS ~X15fi. GLA'65 k„
, ~'aoM STA. l6+5~! ~ TO 5TA. Ils+3~O
vEnu.En ~.o. s~.cr~o►J . 3_tb ccP4En r~~M VtrLw
i . '~pECIA~ Gllt~f~ INLET , INL~T CO NLET CGrIE4'1 OETAI L
I
n j.. ~
i I I I I 'a.~~ ew p.r. ` of~irx ~ R. ~ I i I BCALE ~PaK~NE cou~rrr rMCrx~cR ~~Ab IMp11~JVEM►E~1'~ C31SZ121C'j N0. -'T f►S0. 4l9 Sti►~~~
i ! I I I o•~~a~+a er~ Approv~~'r f I f 1 ~ . HONiIONTAI ►+o c~c ~ a~ ~riar.a, sa. ou c M~ R .
f► 1• 1 T!\ \ I~ ~ Ir 1 ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , . ~ ~ CIwcM~q By: 8pck~n~ Ylh. 902l0 _ ~ I , ~ 1,~ct . . . . . . . _ . , . . . . . . . . 7 ~,r~
~C.~-. ~t~ . . . . or
sTA~ b+Bl.o9
STA. I b+81.4~! +Q1.4"s
~1'A . 6+3~ IMpl~OVEM~17
' MISSION A`JE. h115S I O hl LwN~ . . s - ,
~ , ,
~ ' W ~ a +.t-• -.1 ~ / i : ~Y ~I y / ~ - ~3~, ~
r d, 0~( ~ s _ STA. 6{SI ~ a
~ CoN~Ta. SpEUAI ~ o~"~ ) ~U xE - - , rlf~ ~~D INI.fT. ~
i I I 1 I I I> > 1~`CAiL 8~lEL7 i I i I i 1 I ► ~ a 1.._
L J T R s ~1 ~ ~,l~' 7~ r.~ ~ I ~
. F,+CO G ~TI2. . ~C~~M~v~ E111~~. C s7~it1GT TY~E Ib I ~ N N ~ a. d.W. WlTN 77?~E "9F + ~ WI W j~ A~PbWLT i! ~~s 17 T / 0 FGtAM~ ~ G12AT~ I t
pE 7 ~{TA E # / EL.EV. 2d.41. 01 ( ~ G T~, ELE~/. 2D~'j,'~O ~ E
_ Af~t3 TYPE I C~1JC. ~ I f ~ INL.ET W17N TYP~. r
S 2+'15 "1 Fr~.AME» ~ 6iJA'T~ ~ ~ I 5'Tt~. "fYP r' . ~ ' V. 2 I I, ~
c Nc. INLE'~ ~Ti~1 r~, ~.L~ ~4.02 ~ ~ ~ONlJEG7 W ITN ~ ~ T p~ "I" FtIA E~ S~A. ~1+$T „
7E, ELEV. 1d41,46 f I~'tt. CONST~1. Sf~~G1AL 8L.F OF ID plA. ~ I I ST . 4+dQ Cd 3T12. +ClJC1F~s INLE~. 'SEE. CONC. C1JLV plp~ ~ 1 I~~,
1 I I I I TYI~~ Id" l7.L~,t ~,/fl'N ~ 19E~AlL SHE~T f I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7YpE "`I" FI2A~l"~~ ~ ~ i ~
5'TA. {)+45 7~, ELEV. 04~.~4 t~' 6 I I I; cor~snt. rv 'T' / ~ 4s~ cous~►a. rrn~ •n~
fl ~ N ~ b~1C. 'I., T ~(Y f1. o+~ Ll W. WIYM TYC~ ~ ~ ~ TY~ I F ENf3 ~7 ~iTlbhl p Fp 4 ~7 F GCCtATE I
~a~~r~. k.~.~ a~q.+~i t~ taaMe sr~ ~a-ro4 /'f i i 0~ ' F12~ F~, TO 8P'i. ~p ~ i •y~ 4 F.L~V. 24M.qQ~ CAN51'I~UGT TYpE "F3, I~ ~
, ~ ~ ; i i F(lOM STA. 2+QO fi0 i , n~ I , i ~ ~5 . 3+00 ~ i 'Q a q,W. WlTrl 1YpE 3 ~ _,!._r E''- _ ~--~.T ~ ~r F12AME Gt~A'TE, ~ ~ ~4
~ a a w d~ 'ao ELEu 104"i.4'i i N 2 a`~ . \ r~ N ~ ! ~ ~ ~ l. I ~ ~ a►~~ Tr~~ r' c.o~c. ~ i
~ - M~A►'yf 1Nf E 4 . . , VE < I ; ~ N ~ i ~ sTa,, ~+~s a►~~~ wiTU -rr~~ 'i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
i~ _ • p3 , co►,laTti. 5p~et~A1. ~t2AME GC1.A'C~ l ~ - ~ ~ y ~ y~ ~f . TY4 I. .7~ ~J M ~ ~~1 ~ i ~ i i ~ , ~ ~ i A 3 ' Cut~b I~JI.ET. 6E.~ ~~~v, ZOq7.47 i ~ I ~ , - • • ~
f ~ I ~ ~ ~ p GONNE LJi~° i . . - . y. A ' , p~,`TAII• ~'JHE~T . ' . . . . GT N ~ ~ , i ~ p~. ~j t► L.~F bF 10" C}1A. k~
91T ON ~0'n. a b srrasaec ccalJC. CULV. 1~~ pE FQ 2 FT. O P~ Atd ~i wa~ I ~ 5 2~.'15 r
IB ~'f. F M STA. Q~-0O ~ SY~,'T"Yl~E. ~ w oa`r,~i~. ~eu~ ~ ~ p ~ Ya ~TA. I}~o Wr3~~ n.W. w~z~ , ~
v a ~ . ~ ,...a - t~ i 'fY ~ I' FI2~1~ f i _ If11 ~~A.,o+45 _ ~ v a 0 ~ ~4 , ~1.~ . ~
~ co~► `r~t~~ 2 aE. a~ _ , ~ ~ ~ ..n,N w wt~H • ~ Z C NECT W 'j
Q W ~ 1"YP~ •1„ 'F13Ai1E '~2 L.F. OF la" ~ ~ ~ ~I } G `I'E, ELEV. D . CDNC. Gt{~ . - -
$ Q, ~TA. 12+c~ LT' I I 20"~p1. fe1 I p~l~ I 1 I ~ E.IJp CCICIn! S~~ ---1 e c T w ti~ r K i t i i ~ w~ u. r t a~. 1 ~ oNu
' S f i . F. Q F 1 0" ~ t~ E M t 7 M1/ E 4 0 L. F ~ F I ~ i~ 1 ~ ~ x i s- r. c~ n r~ ~ s i n~ w a c ~ k M. ELE'V. 2039_35
D I A. O W C. G I~ L V. , ~ I ~ M. E L E Y. Z p~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ QN ON 14ORT4i txsDd_.T OF 4iYC~1~1'at~iT ~I
\ ~ . A~. s~w c ~ i W . AT. S.w Cotr.. tr1{5S1GN ~ %30,uK
! ~ sTa. a ac. ~ ~ ~M, E~~v 2 .M, ELiEV. 2044.23
cou rrr~ 1~ sra, o~ aa crr. ~ ~ s~K~ 20' n. . ci w si n~.wau~ oF Nou~ . c~.w ~z~ ~ 9c ~ ~ ~ 5pIMsE 11.1 PC7uJEt2 POL-'E dT CCCt. [3F WAUK f NtiLkyCWS.LL
TYPE FI~11J1E I I I E. ~v ~ d~ I ~ I ~a i i i ~
~04~.'~ ►w*.. ~ ~ IS.M. ~tEV. - 'LC~p OF p !.l"''1. F-LEV. 2048.469 'TGp G'F IaLA5T1C G4fa A*L.S. 1Cyfd
, ~ STA. 9~ lo S.l. paiNT ~0 Co~tSTrt. TYt~ ;4" ~ I ! ~ , q ~ - y a t S.I. PaitdT oE SlNTQ { NC]UK
~ B g ~ ~ 7 " tatrrw~ wrr~t ~ . ~ ~
~ SiNTO ` AVE: ~ a ~t' ~~.ar~~ ~ ' I ~aM. ~~v. ~ ~ ~ M ~9 , Gt2AT~ ~1.~V'. 2a4'i.~'9 I (~4~1 N~ ~ ~ I _ - - ~ I 5,i''1. ELIF-V. 2041.q'a ~ ,•-V• ON N4UTf4 P.a+JL.T O1P N`f`C GtAN? I
- A~ "~.W. C l 9 • f ~ A"; 3.'1v+/. GCC7.. C7F VEQ. GLElL k M 15510N
~ f S'[A. 'l~+ 49 ~'A. ~+86 ~ - - ~ ~
E~EC,IN IMp1ZA~VEMFJJT ,~p~~TCi. 'T'fp~ ,
'13` D.W. WITN 9TA. ~j+l2 2 T'Yp~ "2" FZ?1~IME f~+3EGIN IMPt~Cr/E!`1F~iZ ~
} ~24Z~, E1~V. ~ ~ 304'E.?4 . ' i i
i ~ ~ ~
' • Dnwn E~: D~t~ a`F~ OF
~ a ac~cr KAME r~r ~ d P Q C~ 1 l N t 1~ ~ A I~ l~ I A N r r y w~ t~ t 2 Q Q l 7 I M I~ t Z C T/ E M E ti I I~' p I S T C 2~ C 7 N 4. 4 p w q n. a . S o' h~ , w~~«b„ k r r [ N a r~~ e No. 4n srrEE ~
i HOMlrmrtYAG MakaM W, CMck~d AM: ~ o~2ra w~.: ~ w TC] ' VERTICAL 48i-~qa 7IN , MDXWELL , VEt2CLEl~ , N~UK Q , NCaUK `~o~ ~ ~
Mo. iDiM iy Ckd, App. R~rkbn ~
a u u ~ -I a I I i i 1I i~
i i i i i
iu ~ IU T MRShc I - - I QF '
A J ~
MaxwE~.~. hVEhIUE V~RCLEI~ rzaa~ I
o•oo ~ 2 ~ c 3 6 9•ao ~o ii i2 w i5
~ ; : I ~ ~ ( , ~ ~ ~ , , p , I ~ d5 N Q , , ,w ~ J, ~ N
i ~ i i i ~ (~I ~ . M~ ~ IR~ ~ . j I i " . ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ u,+ u~ ~ ~ I P Q ~ ~p dl m ~ ~ •aBo
~ ~4~ 0 N ~ ~ ~p~ < Z~~ Ai 0 r7 ~ ~ ~ t4 c~ 0 • ~ - ; ~ ; ~i~d~ a s ~ , 'd , _ . ni p 4~ _ ; I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ •i ~ , •'ic ~ ~ ~1 b1 p, - ~ ~i ut ~ ~ . { • . - .
. , ~ W ~ - t~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 0 m ~ 0 ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ; ~ IA ~ N ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ , , 7
' ~ *o ai ~ - ~ ~ +o.~a ~ + a P ; . ; , _ _ Sst ' - . ~ - i 48x - 0~- . y~ . } ~ ~ , r4 ~ ~ ~ ~ , . u~ a ~ ,
1 , _ _ _ . . _ . - - - - , LEF~ ~ ~ d1 ~u a 7 ~ra vc U ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
. ~ , • . . 7 > I~ ~ ~ W ~ Lr N u~ i ~ a P 104' VC. i N~ ~ El[18TiNG !'UL ~ ~ ~ > ~ E ~--[X15TIl~G Ca71dUN~lJNfi. .
~ I , ~ U •N I . , 100'~C. . , . Y ' ~ ~ h . . . ` ~ ~ : ~ ; ~ . d. . . , M1~. ~ ~ . . : ~ 'i?OP CL11ZBf 9046
~ N ~ Q . . o ~ 200~V.C ~ ~ i ~ a M ~ !%I TING 4 ~i = ^ ` ~ LEPT . $ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ F; d1 ~ ~ o ~ ~ x --fi--~ y rj }O i ~
, , N. ~ q, _ _ _ . . 3_. _ . N ~ ~ r , tt~ ~ - ~ 7. ~ ~ , Ci_ _ 2040 `
w a~ r f ~ + _ ~"r ~t ~ ~ 2 w ~ ° ~ pa.o~~.e Ga.pv~~' = SA ; f Q~ `i, .eS~~ 0 ♦ ~ ~9 '
a - ~ '''J ~ + + l a_ ao,o :€~r~ g ~ u ~ , - _ , . * 7 - - . _ _ _ _ . . _ . . ~ .
. IINE ~ ~ r ~j - ' I p U , ~ , ~ ~ U I ~ 'i i ~ ~ y + a,.., ~ * ~ i W,~
i ; a q ~a~`~c ~9 ~ ♦ ' ~ , ~ 11'i I.
~ ~ ~ ' ~I ~ N ' . ~ ~ . . . . . . Q ~ . ~ ,oo vc ~ . 7 . S~1 - • * --.2049 ~i
• I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 0 u ~ ~ m
~ ? ~ ` ~ . . . I . . ~ ' " " _ ' ~ . . ~ _ . . . . . ~ - ~ ESti~,TING 2040 ~
I i. ~ • . ~ . I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EUGE dF-6IL ii
I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1 roF cur~ IGN7' , , . ~ I a; CEN'fE2LIN~ pR7FILF'i Q , ~ ~ ~ .
D 1qiP CUQB „ . 1 . ~ ' C! ~ , ~ , I . _ _ . . _ . ~ _ . . . . . . . _ . . . _ tZiGFifi ~ I
~I ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
, ~ 4 ~ I . , i ; ~ , i
~ i e ~ , ~ . ~ . . , , , ~ I ~ . . ; j
I I ~$o ~a m . ~ ~ , ~ ~r a~ ~ ~ - ~ I , ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ a , , . x ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ , ~ . . i
I ri Q n V ~ "~j ~ i Ol ~ I ~ ~~r ~ c ~ v ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~o _ cu _ _ ~ ~ i . ~ . . _ ~ . . - - - _ _ . _ . - . . _ - _ T . _ . . . _ . . . ~
~ - ~ a. x ~Q - . . . ~ , . _ ~`l~fY.•„r , . . • , + ~ ~ : + , , ~~yi:'~:~;~, r ! :ti r , - a . - ~ ~ • , ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ a Ik oI tA ~1 ' ~ f : $ ~ . ~ ~ i,;~,~,j~ . aa~O X ~,~,,p ' ' ~ e....e~+ ~ d7 ~q Qi~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ----•E . - 4..,_.. ~.:ea:;:,:, , t,+s~: ,
~ r. g P Y r a ♦ p! 0 . ,_d~ , IA t~ ~ p 0 ~ ~ ~ . • N . ~ ~ ♦ ~v A 0 . C ~ ~ u ~9 ~
• ♦ ~ ~ ~ > + . • . 4 a ' ~ . . W - a ~ r. t W } U, _ . _ . , _ ..f! ~ . + . . _ ~ fi ~ y. - + • ~ ro~ I -r- - { ,
, ~ sdvc. ~p ~ w d zoo'v.c. ~ u ~ N ~ . ; • , ~ i ~ ~ > + ~ , . yo uc. ; ti ~ ~ ~ W ; q ~ er , ~ Q ~ ~ 1f N ~ ~
I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ri tl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F: ` ~ ~1 'r~ ~ ~ ? ~ E1 ; ~ . _ _ . ~ . - , . . - - - ~ w ~ o: - - -
~ f~ C ~ : _ o~x ~~a.. . r, h w , . ~ . 6~ ~ I + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; • i 0 ~ h ~ ~ • ~ ' i u 0 - - - - ~ ,
d'++ . Ifl t~ ~ ~ Y . ~ ' d ~ ~ ~ v w ~ ~e . 61~~ Q~ 03 ~ N ~ #4~ +i. G1(k97NG ~UIIPLINE ; ~
r~ P EXI67 m Q . . t ~YF ~ ~x ~ ~ ~oso ~ ~ a . tewr~r~u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ - . _ . _ - - --y - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ . _ - - TQP ~JB 2C35
~x _ 3 : ~i~R ~ ~ ~ zao c ~ . I,~~ ~ ' N ; N ~ p
~ o ~ . , ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ v ~r , ~ ~ Pua~ , 1 , m p v ~ ~Ii I U G~LC + Q ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ Qf. . dl C~ y' PitOFILE GC7l1pE'V F' -s---- ; ~
. . x ~ a°~~ _ . . - . - - ~ ~ ~ - , . ~ ~ ~ ~ xi~rc. ~ W 'i ~ ' ~ . ~ a~ .Y~-., ~1 - ~ 1~.. . 7 • ~ :J' r~~~ ~ tA' x
, t9 sdv.c. o-r ~ ~ ~ I ~ . . . ~ . ' `7 Q ~ . . ~ ~ tr ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ . ~ *Y v ~ a h • ~ ~fleo TqP Gu~s r ~ ' n ~ , ~ , . ~ , - ~ ~ ~ . , , . . _ . . : _ . # + , t~. . . _
-,z ~ - - - ~24GH7 ~i +x • o.nox , # - ~ . I « ~ 0 a ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ sr ~ ~ ,
: P ~~ti , ~ ~ ~ > u ; ~ . r~*~ ~ p - ~ . ; > ~ . w ~ a~ ~ ' . ~i 0 C} ~ 4 , , s.av v.c. + ~q . ~
;0.~ ~ ~ 1~ N ~y a ~ ~ ~ ~ - L I • 41 • - ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . - - . . . ~ . * . _ .41 ~j } + ~ _ ~ , ~ -1,o I+ ~ _ to
~f - 4 ~ ~ ~ . ~ 'r . . so v,c. ~ ~ a Q , . ~ ~ 4 , , 'R , ; + ~
. I , SO 4.C. , . ~ ~ I . ~ M f r
' . _ - - I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ t • I I I . -t - a j r f , r . , ~ 41GqT
. . SINT V , i ; ~ . a ~NUa , . , NQu ~204~ . . , , ~ ; . , , , ; ~ ~ ~ - - ;
. . ; I i : , ~ 1 ~ ~ .
~ T 8 9 ' io ~ . , . , , , } , . , , . ~ . . v 00 I 3 3 ~ 5 Ii ~ ~ ~ I I ~ar~wn BY~ O~i• Qf~~CE If1F
I I I 1 I ~CALE gpQKANE COUNTr EN~fNEE I~OI.~D IM~~~VEMENT DISTRIC I 1 I 1 I o.s~an.a ~r ~ APProvads DISTrlIGT sHEFr
1 I 1 i f HaR~xp~r~` H. !11 J~ft~rwn s~. rr FNC EE}I NQ• 4 I'4J Cfi~cN~d 6y: Spokan~ Mh. OD16Q n lis. DyN !1I CAd. A.~ R~vhlon ~ Y R I A ln=g~ Dalr.1~`~ SINTD MI~XIAJEL.L VERCLE~ ~~lU1 ~ ~ ~ ~ oa H T C l 456 ~00 1 1 1 E-12 , 1-IC7UYt,
- • ~ ~ .
I
~
~