The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-0009-00 . ! ~r SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXA.MINER RE Zone Reclassification from the Urban ) Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone to the ) ORDER DISMISSING Community Business (B-2) Zone, ) APPLICATION Applicant: Vern Eden ) File No ZE-09-00 ) ~crerenced application coming on roT nt:blic hearing before the HeannLy t'vudcliibci i.J, Zvvv; li1C dpp111.d11L, Vern Eaen, neing 3dvisea tnat aZ-Olle ' reclassification to the Community Business (B-2) zone cannot be approved unless fro-iitage for the subject property is established along a street or road of the Minor Arterial classification or , higher classification, the site being located along a Collector Arterial, which is a lower classification than Minor Artenal, the public heanng being continued to allow the applicant to try and establish compliance with such frontage requirement, and the applicant requesting withdrawal of the rezone application, pursuant to a letter dated December 1, 2000, from the applicant to the Hearing Examiner and the Spokane County Division of Planning; now, therefore, rt is hereby - ORDERED AND DECREED that the above-referenced apphcation for a zone reclassificanon is dismissed without prejudice. ~ DATED this 29`' day of December, 2000. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER / ` Michaei C. Dempsey, WSBA #8235 I HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-9-00 Page 1 ~ ~ NOTICE OF FiNAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA determination is final and conclusive unless wlthin ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's wrrtten decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.708.110 (9) indicates that adminlstrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be filed with the board of counry commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the decision. This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on December 29, 2000. Depending on which appeal period referenced above legally applies, and counting to the next business day whe,a the 1ast day for apneal falls on a holiday or weekend, the a.~,~peal , closing -date is either Januarv 8, 2001 ur Januarv 12, 2001. The complete record in this matter, includmg this decision, is on file during the appeal period ~ with the Office of the Heanng Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be inspected during normal worlang hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-9-00 Page 2 ~ ~ ~ S P O K A N E C O U 1-4 T Y A OFFICE OF THE HHARING EXAMINER MICHAEL C DEMPSEY, CHIEF EXAMINER A November 15, 2000 ti Vern and Marilyn Eden 10408 South Madison Road Valleyford, WA 99036 RE;~E~ill.!~:~ , Dear Applicants. This letter confirms my oral ruling at the conclusion of the public hearing held on November 15, 2000 in the above matter. I will continue the hearing for a penod of 30 days from today's date, until Fnday, December 15, 2000, to give you the opportunity to provide evidence in wnting that the subject property has or can provide frontage along Sullivan Road. This is needed to meet the requirement of Zoning Code 14 626 310, which requtres Community Business (B-2) zones to have frontage along a street of the Minor Artenal classificahon or greater. If you find that you need more time to try and establish the required frontage, you need to submit a letter requesting the same by December 15. Sincerely, Michael C. Dempsey . Heanng Examiner c Jim Falk, Division of Planning Scott Engelhard, Division of Engineenng and Roads a THIRD FLOOR PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING , 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WASHWCTON 99260-0245 PHO1vE (509) 477-7490 • FAX. (509) 477-7478 • TDD• (509) 477-7133 r 1 , 11iolt4t starus Active ENGINEER'S 11T' AV SHEET :\s Built Plans Rcrctvcti ReZOne File Z E-QQQ9-QQ -00 Ftu»d Nlans Appmvcd Companitm Filcs- Vcw Rnad Stand8Cd5 S-I 5-95 Mlylar Rrlated C~7es: HearinR: [3uilding Drpt: Tcrhnicul Ftevirw: 04r13/2000 02:15 Prclimrnary Rcvicw: Type: Lnrgc Lot Bfdg. Square Fect l)~atc Rci:tived- 03l2712000 No. I_ots: Nn. Arrts: 1.75 Nroject I`:amt UR-3.5 TO L3-2 BUSINESS Sitr Address S. BROAU11'AY.1t'. CQNK1_iN, E. 5l11_UVAN. N. VALLE1' WAY. AppiicAnt Rangc-Township-Scction: 44 - 25 - 13 PARCEL(S): (first 20) ~ ern bt Mariivri Fticn i'ondiuuns Mailed: 45133.0524 45133.0540 ( lood Zunr Na l(laUB S. MAdison Rd Watcr 5ourcc E'ubhc VALI..CYFURU. W•\ IN036- Srwrr Suurcc f'h11t1C Srhool Dw~t 356 tif)Q19?R-i9ta Fira Disc I Phane Dist Owncr Vorn 3c Manlyn £den I U408 S. Mndisan Rd VALLE1'H1ltD. WA 1003(:- ('ir.,wc I i(►'t)')22t-5H! 4 Building Ph: 473-3675 / Plattning Ph: 4i i-220S Cuolact: JiM FAI..K I)utc Subnutted Description Injtials E:ng Ntec! 'frchnicaUy {'amplctc Eng Nccd Ftannard itd Mingntion Eng Necd t)rainage Atwts Cng hra:d Ttafric Analysis tirtg heed Otiur - - Fng Agrce Pay Fccs Reccivcci - Eng 1=ina1 Plat Fees Completed Cppy to Act'ounting Eng Agrec Priority Fees Rcceivrcl Cng Prclim Plat Frca Complckd Noact to Public / Nadcc to Nublic d ! 3^ 4 b Complcted - ur Nceds tu he signed !>rtitrn Uc iauun Dltr~ (In -(lutj un quan ~r{ I-or druinuge item calculatod Ilcanng Dntc Ihriscun AFp Den Cond AppW DCC Appca1cd w E3CC [kcision App Dcn Cond Appid Court Appcalcd w Cuurt Drcision App fkn Cand Appld ! Stamped Myiars to Seerctary (Sandy) , Stamped 208 Lcit Pfans !o SccntAry (Sandy) ENGiNEE ,'vIEW SHEE'1 ' ,.:,iub Actt%*c ;\s nuilt PlanS ttecrivCd Rezune Fiie ZE_0009-00 -00 koad ('lans Apptovcd Companion Filts: INt%% fl~~ad ~~::ni'::ru> j.l !~1~l.it Rclatcd Files; Hcaring: 11r1512000 9:00 Huilding Dcpt: l'echmcai Rcvicw- 04113!?0(NJ 2: t S Piriintinnry Rcvicw: 'fype: Largc Lat [31dg. Squsur Fcrt i>nte Itece►vec1: 43,27,2(l0t1 A.:r_:, I'rajert Name UR-3.3 TO B-2 BV'SLNESS ~ ~itc rWdrzszs S. l'iRUAU1h'AY, N1' Ci)VKI..1N. I 1~1 I i I\ ~•.ti. `ti ~A: l E ti',1 Vi , Applirnat [L3ngc=l~ow~nship-Scc uon 4~3 - 25 - 13 YARCEL(S): Ifirst 2U} ~'rn~ hlanl~~n L-~cn ~~.,nd~c~ons hfa►led: / Q~~y-d Q 41133.0524 45133.0540 Floc►d Zone Nu 10408 S. I►-laJixan Etd Wacrr Sourrr 1'ul,lic `•'Al_I.E:YfnRD. WA 99036- _ SCK^Z.'(' SOUtiZ7 ~'~lOt1C SCl1Wl UfSi : D 0 iOr/) q29•5914 Ftrc UtSI 1 Pharfe Dist Ownrr ~ crn & Marilyn Edcn l 1. ~40'i S. Madison Rd %,\i I l.lTOitl,, W.;. l'tt•.:tC !;t:,Ithng Ph 4-7-3c,?; 1'lanning t'ii s%7-??U` Contact J1~ti1 tAth 1)ate Submitteci Description [nitials Cng Nccd Tcchnicallv Camplrtc Eng Neeci 1-iarvsrcl ftd A9iagatian f.:ng nrcd Drainnge Plans Eng Nccd TraRic Analysis Eng IVccd Other Fng Agcrr Pay Fres RccCivcd rng rinal Plat Fecs Complctcd Copy io Accounting Fng Agrrr Priunry Fees Received Eng Prelim Plat Fees Corrmicted Naticc to Public I Notirc tu Publir # 1 3 4 6 Ccintpklcd - or hetcls to tic signett - - ~l.hl::h i)l'!::ilitl I ~J[r~ 1 itl ~ ;ll'. ) , !i~}I] q U:k(1[l77Ji kSrLai cu►ge ittmcalculatsxl Eieanng i►air i.kk,:is~un App C3c11 Cc, n d rtppllli(,'C - - Appealed ta BCC Dccisiun App Ikn Cend AppIJ Court Appealcd to Court Dccision App ikn Cand Appld titumped N4ylars to 5ctrctary (Sandy) Siamrec: 208 l.ot P1ans, wS*,eorets=•>• (SandY) ~ SCOTT ENiGELHARD J DIVISIdN 01' ~T~JINEERTNG INTEROFFIC.E,.NU AL ~ , STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER " File ZE-9-00 WnHO ~ ,iil DIVISION OF PLANNING Spomle COWTY HEARING DATE: November 15, 2000 @ 9 A M FILE ZE-9-00 PROJECT PLANNER Jim Falk, Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Community Business (B-2) for those uses ailowed in the B-2 Zone A site specific development project is not proposed at this time Project Data Project Location: - The side addresses are 15523 and 15525 East Valley Way The site is generally located on the north side of Valley Way, approximately 200 feet east of Suilivan Road, in the SW %4 of Section 13, Township 25 N, Range 44 E WM Parcel Number: 45133 0524, 45133 0540 Owner: Vern and Marilyn Eden, 10408 South Madison - _ ' Road, Vaileyford, WA. 99036, 928-5914 Agent: - None Camprehensive Ptan Western 1/6 of site is Major Commercial (C), Desi_gnation: eastern 5/6 of site is Urban (U) Zoning: _ Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) Existing Land Use: _ Tax parcels 45133.05-40 and 45133 0524 are both occupied by single family dwellings and - associated accessory improvements The eastern half of 45133.0524 is a pasture area for - - - horses Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: - _ • North: The parcel north of tax parcel 45133 0540 is zoned Community Business (B-2) and is ' - developed with a retail establishment The parcel north of 45133 0524 is zoned Urban - Residential (UR-3 5) and is occupied by a large = - church complex Further north is Broadway - Avenue and a retail complex fronting on the north side of this road. - • South: , The parcels south of the project site are zoned Community Business (B-2) and developed with ' - various retail uses. The access to the retail File No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Heanng 1 of 8 ~ ♦ Y ~ compiex~s immediately across Valley Way from the project site • East: Parcels immediately east of the subject site are zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) The area is developed with low density single family homes on '/z acre to 5 acre lots • West: The parcel lying immediately to the west of the project site is zoned Community Business (8-2) and is developed with a power substation The parcel is owned by Vera Water and Power The area further west across Sullivan Road is zoned B-2 and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) The B-2 zoned parcels fronting on Sullivan Road are developed with retail uses Known Land Use Proposals and Recent (since 1-1-91)land use proposals and Recent Project Approvals in the recent project approvais within '/z mile of the Area of this Project: area include • ZE-20-98C, a 2 acre rezone from UR-7 to UR-22 on Valley Way 220 feet west of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley _ Way • BSP-47-96, a Binding Site Plan creating 2 commercial lots in a B-3 Zone 170 feet north of the northwest corner of Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue • ZE-04-98, a 2 5 acre rezone from B-2 to B-3 located between Sullivan Road and Conklin Road and fronting on Sprague Avenue • ZE-27-89, a 26 acre parcel that was previously classified in 4 zones was classified to B-2 and SR-1/2 located between Valley Way and Sprague Avenue - - on the east side of Sullivan Road _ • BSP-55-97, a Binding Site Plan creating 3 commercial parcels in a B-3 Zone located at the northeast corner of Broadway and _ - - ' Sullivan Roads. - - • ZE-34-91 C, a change in condifions zone change from B-3 to B-3 to allow for 346,542 square feet of retail space located near the northeast corner of Broadway and Sullivan _ Roads Land Division Status:-_ The subject parcels are tax parcels of record created by the County Assessor Both parcels are a portion of Block 21 of the old Vera - Subdivision. Since building permits for single ' family homes were issued in the 1930s or 40s _ for each parcel the parcels are exempt from p, platting and the Certificate of Exemption - process File No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Heanng 2of8 . . ~ 3 ~ p-- r Shoreiine besignation: Not applicable V1later Purveyor: The proposal is located within the Vera Irrigation District #15 Water service will be provided from an existing public water supply when approved by the Spokane Regional Heaith District Water service shall be provided in accordance with the _ coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County 5ewage iiisposal: The County sewer system is available to serve the site A sewer line is located in front of the project site under Valley Way Avenue Plans and specifications for connection to the sewer will be reviewed prior to the issuance of any sewer connection permit or building permit 11;1re bistrict The proposal is located in Fire District No 1 School District and nearest K-12 The proposal is located in the Central Valley Schools: School District No 356 Progress Elementary School, Evergreen Jr High and Central Valley High School are the K-12 public schools located nearest to the proposal Nearest Arterial and Distance: The subject property is located 250 feet east of Sullivan Road, a prinapal arterial The project site aiso fronts on Valiey Way, a coliector arterial Nearest Parks and Distance: Terrace View and Sullivan Parks are the County - parks located nearest to the proposal Terrace View Park is approximately 7.5 acres in size and is located approximately 2 5 miles south of the - subject site. Neigtiborhood Association: None identified. • This proposal is located inside the IUGA. • This proposal is located inside a Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA) • This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands GMA/Critical Areas Aquifer Recharge Area: _ This proposal is located inside of the _ Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) - and mside of the Aquifer Sensitive Area - - (ASA) Overlay Zone. Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation - No priority wildlife species are located Areas: ; on the site per the Spokane County Wildlife Map. Floodplain. A review of the FIRM indicates that the - - _ , , proposal is located outside of any , - floodplain. File No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Hearing 3 of 8 , t , Geologically Hazardous Areas: , No Geologically Hazardous Areas are indicated on the Spokane County Geologicaliy Hazardous Soils Map Wetlands: No wetlands are indicated per the Spokane County Wetlands Maps SEPA ❑ DNS issued October 27, 2000 0 Comment period ended November 13, 2000 The appeal period ends the same time as the appeai time frame for the proposed land use action expires Noticinq Published Spokesman Review on October 27, 2000 Mailing and Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for site posting and mailing the Notice of Hearing to affected agencies and property owners/taxpayers of property located within 400 feet of the subject property was October 30, 2000 1724 Compliance Dates Application Accepted (Counter Complete) March 16, 2000 Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued September 14, 2000 ReviewinQ AQencies Fourteen(14) Agencies were notified on March 23 and October 24, 2000 Comments were due April 13 and October 24, 2000 Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Receive ~ ' - Received - Receive d d Division of Engineering Yes 4/13/00 Boundary Review No Transportation 10/24/00 Board Development Yes 3/31 /00 Spokane Regional No Engineenng Services Transportation Council Spokane County No Spokane Transit No Division of Utilities Authority Spokane County Yes 4/13/00 Fire District No 1 Yes 4/11/00 Stormwater Utilities Spokane Regional Yes 4/13/00 Vera Water & Power No Health District 11/6/00 Spokane County Air Yes 3/30/00, Town of Millwood No Pollution Control Auth 10/23/00 Department of Ecology No Spokane County No Parks and Recreation Responses from the Public: No wntten responses from the public have been received Fde No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Heanng 4 of 8 . ~ s e Description of the Site: The project site is 1 75 acres in area and is relatively level The site addresses are 15523 and 15525 East Valley Way Two single family homes, garages and fencing occupy the two tax parcels that are a subJect of this application The homes are occupied The proJect site includes about 6 or 7 fir trees The eastern 1/4'" of the proJect site is used as pasture land for horses which were observed on the project site Description of the Surrounding Neiahborhood: The surrounding neighborhood is a mix of development to include several types of regional serving businesses, a power substation, major church complex, single family dwellings, small tract single family homes and pasture land Nearby Sullivan Road is a maJor commercial corridor connecting Interstate 90 and the north Spokane Valley area with Sprague Avenue about 1,500 feet south of the project site Fronting parcels east and west of Sullivan Road are zoned primarily Regional Business (B-3) and Community Business (B-2) with some parcels zoned Neighborhood Business (B-1) The parcels fronting on both sides of Sullivan Road from Interstate 90 to Sprague Avenue are developed with a variety of Regional and Community commercial uses The Sprague Avenue corridor south of the subject site is heavily developed with regional serving businesses Sullivan Road is 250 feet west of the project site and is classified a Primary Arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan The project site fronts on Valley Way Avenue, a road classified as a Collector Arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan The Road has 40 feet of right of way and the Arterial Road Plan requires 70 feet of right of way Background: Vern Eden, one of the two applicants, participated with planning staff in a pre-application conference on September 10, 1999 He submitted a counter complete reclassification application on March 16, 2000 A Technical Review meeting was held on April 13, 2000, at which time the appltcation was determined to be Technically Incomplete due traffic impact concerns Traffic impact information was provided and the applicants were issued a Determination of Technical Completeness on September 14, 2000 The applicants do not propose a specific site development project They prefer to seek a generlc reclassification so that they may develop any business permitted in the Community Business (B-2) Zone without having to return to the Hearing Examiner for further public hearings and approvals Staff Analvsis Comprehensive Plan: The subject site is located in both the Urban category and Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan The proJect site is also in the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) established pursuant to RCW 36.70A, the Growth Management Act The proposal is also subject to the transition area definition of the Comprehensive Plan Specifically, the western 1/6'h of the project site is located in the Major Commercial category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Land Use Plan The eastern 5/6ths of the project site is located in the Urban Category of the Comprehensive Plan The area east of the project site is designated Urban. The area west of the project site is designated Major Commercial The surrounding area within 1000 feet of the project site is classified in five zones to include B-1, B-2, B-3, UR-3 5 and UR-22. Varied land uses including single family dwellings, professional office buildings and a variety of commercial uses are located in the same area. Also, within 250 feet of the site is the intersection of two significant arterial roads, Sullivan Road and Valley Way. Interstate 90 is about 3000 feet north of the project site. Due to this zoning and land use mix and the trend towards commercial development of the vicinity is the project site is deemed to be an area in transition File No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Hearing 5 of 8 . + s < The Comprehensive Plan defines "Transition Areas" on page 330 as the fringe areas between two or more Comprehensive Plan land use categories This is an area which can allow developments complying with either of the Land Use Map categories dependent upon the decision makers' site-specific approval It is the intent that the established boundaries between land use categories are accurate and definable on the ground, but the Plan also recognizes that a specific proposal may cross or be adjacent to the boundaries In these instances, depending on the impacts to existing land use categones and the distance a use intrudes into an adjacent category, a Comprehensive Plan amendment may not be required to allow a use that is generically incompatible with the category a site is located in Section D of the detailed definition of the Urban category indicates major commercial users are incompatible with the Urban category The proposed Community Business (B-2) Zone is not intended to implement the Urban category but rather the Major Commercial category However, Objective 1 5 e of the Urban category states, that when a neighborhood experiences pressure for change in character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review Based on the data in the first paragraph of this section (Comprehensive Plan) and based on the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan language addressed in the paragraph immediately above the subJect site is located in an area that is in transition Since the rezone site is located in a land use transitional area and considering the type of land uses permitted in the requested B-2 Zone such zone designation appears to be consistent with the transitional area policy in the Comprehensive Plan Wording within the Comprehensive Plan specifically relating to and supporting the improvements on the subject site is as follows• The Major Commercial category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses, directly related to major throughways Certain residential uses, particularly multi-family developments may be compatible through the use of proper screening and performance standards Major Commercial areas feature high-intensity uses Heavy automobile traffic and related congestion may create pollution problems, especially along commercial strip development Arterial strip commercial development will usually be made up of businesses on individual parcels clustered along heavily traveled streets or highways each providing off-street parking. Shopping is not done by walking from one store to another but rather is of a single- purpose nature Most commercial development will be on relatively flat land and buildings will be of a low profile Paved parking, streets and man-made structures will dominate the site with few natural features to be found Landscaping, screening, lighting, signage and other architectural treatment will provide for aesthetically pleasing development. The project site is relatively flat and commercial projects locating there on will provide for landscaping, screening, lighting and signage as required by the County Zoning Code Major commercial areas require a full line of public services and utilities including sanitary and storm sewers, public water systems Underground utilities such as telephone, gas, electricity are also common in commercial areas. These services are available to the proJect site except storm sewers Surface drainage will be accommodated on-site due to the application of surface drainage requirements in the County Stormwater Management Guidelines Goal 6.1 promotes development of commercial land in a manner which is complementary and compatible with adjacent land uses and the surrounding environment. This concept is further supported by Objectives 6 1.a-d and Decision Guidelines 6 1.1-6.1.3 which encourage buffenng, landscaping and structure orientation as a means of assuring compatibility between commercial File No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Hearmg 6 of 8 and adjacent land uses Site specific commercial developments will be consistent with these Decisions Guidelines due to the application of County' development and environmental codes which have provisions which require that these issues be adequately addressed Objectives 6 1 c and 6 1 d, and respective Decision Guidelines 6 1 5 and 6 1 6 identify the need to provide adequate off-street parking, circulation patterns and access to public transit Commercial development should conform to plans and regulations of the County water, sewer, utility and special districts Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, compliance with the applicable parking standards identified in the Spokane County Zoning Code must be demonstrated and internal circulation patterns must be approved by the County Engineer Public transit is available as Spokane Transit Authority bus route 90 serves Sullivan Road and the immediate vicinity of the proJect site During proJect review sewer and water purveyors will be asked to review site development plans to assure that the project conforms to their requirements The proposal is not consistent with Objectives 6 1 f and 6 1 g nor Decision Guideline 6 17 of the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan These polices encourage the clustering of commercial uses with shared physical facilities such as ingress/egress, parking, signs, buffering and landscaping Aithough the proJect site is located in an area trending to commercial development the proJect site will not be able to share parking, signage, ingress/egress and buffering. The parcel immediately west of the proJect site is a power substation and the commercial land use (Car Toys retaii store) northwest of the project site and fronting on Sullivan Road is developed in a manner where sharing of these features would be very difficult In essence, Valley Way seems to be the only reasonable access to the site precluding any shanng Additionally, the analysis in the second paragraph of the Zoning Analysis Section below regarding unplanned commercialization of Valley Way east of Sullivan Road leads to the conciusion that the project site is inconsistent with the Objective 6.1 f and 6 1 g and Decision Guideline 6 17. It is the intent of Objectives 6 1 i and 6.1 j and Decision Guideline 6.1 13 to encourage commercial development that is in scale with the needs of the County population and existing development. Small scale commercial developments should be located adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The applicants have not provided any information identifying the need for additional community serving commercial development locating off of the Sullivan Road commercial corridor and adjacent to a single family home area Although 5/6ths the project site is located in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, the site is subject to the definition of a transition area provided within the Comprehensive Plan The proposal is generally consistent with the majorlty of the Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category, assuming any site specific development project complies with all County development and environmental mitigation codes However, the proposal is in conflict with Objectives and Decision Guidelines which encourage commercial clustering for provisions of shared physical facilities However, these policies and recommendations can be satisfied through site design The subject application is consistent with the requirements of County Growth Management Resolution 97-0321 Zoning: The purpose of the B-2 zone is to provide for the establishment of commercial centers which will meet the needs of a community for a wide range of retail and service uses and to implement the Major Commeraal Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The "B-2" zone is intended primarily to accommodate community shopping facilities consisting of varied retail, service and office establishments grouped at one location served by arterials where they can serve a trade area encompassing the several neighborhoods, usually within a distance of approximately one to one and one-half (1-1/2) miles of such zone. The function of the 6-2 zone is to provide a wider selection of goods and services than can be found in the 6-1 zone, and to do Fde No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Heanng 7 of 8 . . ► y ~ so within a shorter driving distance from the ho.me than the B-3 zone It is further intended that the location and quantity of the land in B-2 zone should be commensurate with the needs of the present and potential population within said trade area Any B-2-zoned area should not be larger than twenty (20) acres in size with frontage on a minor arterial or higher ciassification roadway not exceeding fourteen hundred (1,400) feet It is intended that these community shopping facilities be provided, wherever possible, in one business island centrally located in the trade area or in business clusters rather than in ribbon development along arterials or in several oversized neighborhood shopping centers General characteristics of these areas inciude paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit availability , While the western 1/6th of the project site is located in the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive Plan the eastern 5/6`h is located in a"transitional area" as pointed out above in the analysis of the Comprehensive Plan Given the commercial development trend occurring in the immediate vicinity, the classification of the entire site as Community Business B-2 appears consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's "transitional area" policy The project site fronts on a minor arteriai The existing contiguous Community Business Zoning in the immediate vicinity is about 25 acres. Approval of the subJect application will add 1 3/ acres, or a small fraction, to the existing contiguous B-2 Zone The contiguous B-2 Zoning in the vicinity is part of the already well established ribbon of commercial development and commercial zoning on both sides of Sullivan Road from Interstate 90 to Sprague Avenue, a distance of about 4000 feet Commercial clusters are evoiving at the Interstate 90/Broadway Avenue end and the Sprague Avenue end The subject project site is located almost half of the way between Interstate 90 and Sprague Only on the east side of Sullivan Road is commercial development and commercial zoning occurring on 2"d tier parcels not fronting on Sullivan Road However, an analysis of the commerciai zoning in the area shows that the owners of all 2"d tier parcels also own contiguous 1s' tier parcels fronting on Sullivan Road and the commeraal projects thereon are accessed from Sullivan Road Should the subject reclassification be approved and should commercial projects developed thereon have access only to Valley Way such a situation will be setting a precedent for the area. Such occurrence may encourage other 2"d tier ownerships in the vicinity to commercially develop their property thereby allowing unplanned commercial development along Also, the approval of this application may set a precedent that encourages commercial ribboning along Valley Way east of Sullivan Road The variety of services and facilities described above necessary to serve a B-2 Zone are available to the project site except sidewalks do not exist on Valley Way. There is no site specific commercial development proposed by the applicants at this time. However, at such time as it is proposed the applicants or the assigns and successors will be required to comply with all Spokane County development regulations. Attachments A Maps • Vicmity Map • Site Plan • Comprehensive Plan ~gency Zoning B. and Public Comments C. Conditions of Approval Ftle No ZE-9-00 Staff Report - November 15, 2000 Public Hearing 8 of 8 . r ATTACHMENT A MAPS VICINiTY NrAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP ZONING MAP ~ J~i~~~~~ 00 nuq y~►a ■ i ~ i p~p~~ yITI~i~ ~►t.v'r ~1 !,~►i ue ~►~1 ~ _ I+ I I ' a ~ ~I i ~ , t^~ ~rt~t Al tl ;oz~ 1 ~wow - ! ~t ~ ~f rbn ~ a03 ~ r ~ m ~ ~ ~ • y ~ • ~4 IL ~ , 1 1. {K~(~~P+~i~~1~~i► ~ a ~ .~a ~ t!i►~,i~+[.t yy1 ~I,Ct ~ .~~i V~ +1y 24 1 ~ 13~Atz ~ ~ ~ ~AVOO ~ ; ~ r►~► ~ S03le a + - . ~ ~ ~x~s~:~~ ~ t - i ~ ~ . • }~0~.5~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3i - ~ ~ r`~' ° ~ ~ ~ . ~ } ~ r ' O L4 a S,e ~ • - f ~ ~ • ~ , ~ RCCFIVED f~D~A4~ICD~1N7~F SpoIC~1~lE COUNT~ S Y 1NA Y rry' R ~ a 4 r d r ti''J d_~ -•___,a...~- - ~ _ ~ ~MAR- Llk ZOQQY tiART 1 ` Gl1[SfiEh[T PLA~+1HUtiG PN«1t ~ ~~n~r~ F~r~~ra~ ~~ol~ ~ • , , ZE-09-00 , Comprehensive Land Use Plan I ~ - ~ i I I& ~ I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I Mallo; i ( - - I _ R~:~ _ ~ - - ~ spr I u ~ ~I f i / I ~ ~ -I ~ ~ . • i - - ~ ~ I ° ~ ~ L. i and pvL I Bfr.h {m. t TQ ~ H H lu. rl d 4thL=La c Sp ua pvt I ~ T Sth ~ A ~ I tEl I _ I J111,11 „f,,,.,,, _ F6d1 ~ r ~IIII~~IIII~I~II~~~I~~I~J-1~V~1 T 1 I1. Scale :1 inch - 833 h(rounded) 11/09/00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Sub)ect Property within IUGA AA^ -A" Subject Property within UTA. f . ~ ZE-09-00 Existing Zoning ~)R-7 5' 5 B-3 49 68C B~ 188 4C T ~ ~ 1 ( jR~2 5Q 83 , U - -1 8C) ~ - 9B il1 ~ U - 52 I B•3 34 91f - I B-3 4~1 70C , ✓ 54 I ~ I I R ED - JR 2481. I , C t3maclwnY i 1- k.rft l~ R=.5 0 4_-2 60 4 I B-3 50 92C - U 7 ~ ~0 . 1 I ' B- 140 79C UR-3.9 60 42 ' g C UR•3.5 60 42 -71F-2-601Z~ ( fsTm UR-1.5 6142 UR•3.5 v0 42- ~ ~ ~ U qR 77 • I B-1242 79C ~ ~ • / UR 20 8C , . Up U13J ~ J•2 60 41 ' a _ ~t . 6 42 ~i ' I i I ~ ~ I IRA~ c ( IB-2 0 4 ~ I28 8$C UR- 5 042 - ( i ~ p ~ l IR-:.5 60 42 „ I _ 6 13 B-3 -2 52 89f ~ B-2 27 89 B-3 52 89C 14 B-3 311 S3 ~ UR•22 63 78C I B 4218-,C B-3 04 98 B- 58 7C B-3 311 53 B•3 L 78C ' UR,22 14 3C ~ - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - -i ~ w F1153 ~14LC 6 ~ I 1 2 84 B- 2 12ffl g.~ -2 2 ( B- 3 31163 - 6• 17 713 ~ 8 4 ~ 11 B 21 ] I-2 5 It 400 ( IM52 60 24 B- 4 I I 42 a I ' . - 7 U 8. 2 77 U-.5 0 U 221 j I822~.28r UR-221186C UR-22 r42 82C B 438 Scale 1 inch - 500 ft(roundec) 11/09/00 Existing Zornng . ~ ATTACHMENT 6 CONDtT10N3 OF APPROVAL ~ . , 1 ~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ZE-9-00 inmi DIVISION OF PLANNING spomie Couxiy 1 All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors 2 The zone change applies only to the parcel legally described in the Planning Division proJect application file designated ZE-9-00, Assessor's tax parcel nos 45133 0524 and 45133 0540 3 The the development of the subject reciassification site shall comply with the Community Business (B-2) Zone and all applicable chapters of the County Zoning Code, as amended 4. Should the Hearing Examiner accept Condition 11 recommended by the County Division of Roads and Transportation dated October 24, 2000 (attached to this report) the Spokane County Division of Planning recommends that it prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shali be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following a At least 12.5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way adjacent to Valley Way b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area c No required landscaping, parking, ground water percolations areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of- way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. . 5 The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property legally described as [from file No. ZE-9-00], is the subject of a land use action heard November 15, 2000 by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on (insert legal description),imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-9-00 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning. 6. The Division of Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including {apsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which sha11 generally provide as follows "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows (insert legal descnption) . ~ R e ~ ~ e AfiTJ4CHmr:NT C 14GE NCY COMMI ENTS 1 SPOKANE REGIONAL HF,ALTH DISTRICT R~~~~~E-,,-) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION S POKA WE ~ Inter-office Communication N, J v ZL, s0 DATE November 6, 2000 DIVISION OF Pl.AraIqlNG.- T0: Jim Falk, Associate Planner, Spokane County Current Planrung Division FROM: Steven P. Holderby, R.S. - EHD, SRHD SUBJECT. Proposed Zone Change: ZE-9-00 (Eden) 1 References• a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 20', by the applicant, dated March 14, 2000, received by this office March 27, 2000. b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, WashinRton and Idaho, Allan B. Griggs, 1966 c) Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U S.D A., March, 1968 d) Spokane Count.y, Washington, Engineering Internretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S D A., August, 1974. e) Spokane Count.y Rules and Re,gulations for Sewage Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995. fl Logs of water wells in Range 44, 45E, Township ZSN, Sections 12, 13, 14, 18, and 24. g) Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E, U.S.G.S., 1973 2 Findings • a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer. b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Vera Water and Power Co. Water supply will be a public system. c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. 111e topography and soils in ' • ! , the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-srte sewage disposal systems The lot is of the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system. d) The project lies in a relatively flat area east of Sullivan Road and north of Valley Way Local drainageways are insignificant e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loam with 0% to 5% slopes They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight There is also possible contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV fl Geolobically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposrts These geological structures generally yield nioderate to very large amounts of water Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are from 81' to 457' deep and have static water levels varying from 42' to 120' below the surface. The Vera Water and Power Co. has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the proj ect upon completion of agreements with the proponent 3 Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved: a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County b) Water service sha11 be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval- a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County c: Sponsor: VERN & MARILYN EDEN 10408 S MADISON RD VALLEYFORD WA 99036 . • / ' MEMORAim D U M DATE: Apnl 13, 2000 CEI\/ED NE GOL1N~;~ TO: Jun Falk e`nt~ anning SPO~ ~ FROM: Kathe e il cr/ and Virgmia Darrell, P E,Stornlwater Utilay AP R 1 ~2000 RE: ZE-09-00 CC: CURRENT PLANNING pIV1S1~ )t- During the building permit process the applicant will need to submit a drainage plan in accordance with the Guidelines for Stormwater Management. The SEPA Checklist indicated that existing structures will be removed. If grading of the site occurs during the demolition, the applicant needs to be aware that an erosion and sediment control (esc) plan is required for any permitted activities that disturb the land-such as a grading permit. The esc plan woutd need to be submitted prior to receiving a grading permit. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. K ~Stom►UCathennelDESIGN\te0800 doc . • c ~ RECEIVEL) From• Hemmings, Bill SPOKANE COE_cNTY Sent. Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9:32 AM To: Falk, Jim MAR 3 ' 20000 Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy, Sims, Brenda, Miller, Katherine; Darrell, Virginia; Parry, Ed CURRENT PLANNING D!V15101v' Subject: ZE-9-00 - Vern Eden 3-28-00 I received this proposal on March 27, 2000. I consider this proposal to be technically complete I know of no critical areas on this site I recommend current road and drainage standards for this zone change Bill Hemmings, PE MEMORANDUM ~ Y~gl 1,1 ~ . . . . t_ . , DATE: May 9, 2000 ~ TO: Scott Engelhard M ~`~f ' 4,1.~ CC: Ann Winkler, Inland Pacific Engineering, MIRENT P A(-n ~~Jim Falk, Spokane County Planning ~r~ti~NU u~y~~,~FROM: Steve Stair<S'~ SUBJECT: Traffic Distribution Letter for Eden Property Rezone fl (ZE-09-00) dated May 8, 2000 SPmft(;o.1IyTY This distribution letter is for a rezone and is not accompanied with a specific development proposai or site plan making it difficult to determine the true traffic impacts from developing this site. As you know, we have used distribution letters for development proposals in the Sullivan Rd. corridor as a basis to assess pro-rata participation in the construction of the Ioop-ramp at the Sullivan Rd Interchange of 190 The distribution letter for the Eden Property Rezone assumes the highest and best use as an 18.7ksf shopping center. However, a more intense traffic generator would likely be a bank, fast food restaurant or convenience store, etc. In addition, the discussion of pass-by traffic would be better described and analyzed as diverted trips Nonetheless, I recommend we defer the detailed review of traffic until a specific development proposal (site plan and/or building pennit request) is submitted. At that time, a more realistic evaluation of traffic, pro-rata participation in the loop-ramp and any impacts can be determined. If you have any questions, please feel free to bring them to my attention. MAR-28-00 02:39PM FROM-SCAPCA 5094776828 T-762 P 01/04 F-892 ♦ L ~ SPOKANE COUNTY b CLEARo°AIR MR POllU114N 4% P o K A" E CONTROI AUTHORRY WEST 1101 COLLEGE. SUITE 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 ~(509) 477-4727 Fax (509) 477-6825 Date: March 28, 2000 To: Mr. Jitn Falk ~p~~RECF (VE(~ Spokane County D.~v.~s. ~on Planning NE W~~~NTY 1026 W. Broadway Ave. MAR 3 `J 2000 Spokane, WA 99260 Frotrt: Mr. Charies E. Studer CURRENT PLANNiNG DMviON Re: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR: Fite Na. ZE-9-00 Proponent: Vern and Marilyn Eden for Rezone of property to B-2 - Parceis 45133.0524 and 45133.0540 150 ft. east of Sullivan Rd. and Valiey Way Date Received: 3/28/2000 (Technical Review Meetinq Conference on 411312000 (c2:15 pm) The Spokane Counry Air Po!luAon Control Authority (SCAPCA) was formed under the duthority of tha 1967 C1ean Air Act of Washington (RCVI9. That Act required countles, li-ke Spokane Counry, Ie ectivate /oca/ airpo!lutron oontrvl agenuas. To meet the r+equiremenis of that Act, SCAPCA adopted regulabons tc control the emissfons ot air contaminants hnm soumes wffhin Spolcane Counry. " PoRions of Spakane Counry fail to meet faderal heatrh standarrls lfar particulate emissions (dust and smoke) and carbon monoxrde Numerous strategies have been impJemenred to reduce air poluGion emissions so that we can improve loir quality and meet health srandards Fo/lowing is a list o1 concemsfissues thaG at a rninfmum, nsed tn be addressed fbr prvposed projects. Additran&1 -comments may resuh after more detailed informadon of the project i,s supplied. SCAPG4 errcourages proponents to corrtact their otFioes at 1701 Wesr College, Spokane, WA 99201 foraddidonal lnfvrmauon. The foNowing conditions are reievant ro proposed project SILVICULTLJRAI. DEBRIS REQUlREMENTS Harvesung of amber creates siivicuitural debris The proposal (ies within tfie Carbon Monowde or PM,o non- attainment area as identified by the U.S. EPA. The extensive uti(ization of the land will prevent an extreme fire hazard from ever being established. Iberefcre, the buminq of silvicukural materia( is prohibited under Washin4ton Sxate Law (RCW 70.941 The debns must be removed by methods other than burnrng. POSSiBLE PERMITS REQUIRED SCAPCA and Washington State Regulations require that a Notice of Constructon and Appiicaton for Approval (NOC) or a Notice of Intent to Establish a Temporary Soume (N41) be submitted oo, and approved by, SCAPCA prror to the consuuction, installation or establishment of air poflufion sources. A$150.00 NOC or NOI filing fee rs required at the time of permit applicabon submrttal. In addition, a engineering review fee, s CMWENMwAM4s9F-940 ox REZONE OF PROPERTY T4 5-2 - PARCELS 45133.0524 ANO 45133.0540150 FT. EAST OF SULLIVAN RD. AND VALLEY WAY March 28. 2000 C~ PMno a► RacycW pav& P19@ 1 . . ~ MAR-28-00 02:39PM FROM-SCAPCA 5094776828 T-T62 P 02/04 F-892 depending on the nature of the air po(luttion source(s), wiil be mvaice to the proponent after the review has been comp{eted. Fees shall be paid by the proponent whether or not the instailation of the proposed air poflution source(s) is approved Construction, installation or establishment of any air Qollution souree wlthout an approved NOC or NOl meM result in detays, fines, addltional fees, closure and civil and/or criminal sanctions. Based on the information provided, air pollutlon sources may be present at the proposed facility/site. TNERE ARE NUMEROUS BUSINESSES (SEE A1TACNEO SHEET) THAT ARE ALLOWF-D tN A COMMERCIAL AND INDU3TRIAL ZONING THAT ARE AIR POLLUTION SOURCES. BEFORE ANY BU3INESS IS ESTABLISHED AT THE SITE, SCAPCA SHOUID BE CONTACTEp TO DETERMINE IF A NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTtON IS REQUIREQ. THE PROPONENT SHOULD PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE COMMENTS TO PROSPEC7NE TENANTS TO ENSURE THAT THE PROPER PERMITS ARE OB7AINED FOR THEIR TYPIE OF BUSINESS. An asbestos surveM must be done bM an AHERA cortified insipector arior to demofition or renovation of buildinqW, to determme if asbestos-containing material is present at the site. Demolition and renovation projects must compiy with tfie requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M, SCAPCA Regulaton I, Article IX & Arbcle X Secuon 10 09, and Washington State Regulations (WAC 296-62, -65, & - 155). Nobce of Intent to Perfarm Asbestos Removal and/or Oemolition forrims are available at the SCAPCA office. Asbestos-containing material must be removed in accordance with Federal, State, Local regufations and disposed of at a licenved facdiry. A nonrefundable asbestvs notifica[iOn tee is required ContdCt SCAPCA for ihe fee schequle SCAPCA recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e mgress, egress, parking areas, access roads) should be paved and kept cJean ta minimtze emissions. The Spokane County 6uilding Department makes the determinabon as to whether paving is required; however, SCAPCA's is cansulted before a deterrt►ination is made The Spokane County 6uilding DepaRment requires an approved paving waiver from SCAPCA before a proponent is allowed to proceed with the ptoject without paving- The paving waiver may require that certain areas of the project be paved, while other areas may be left unpaved. Cortditions (i e. placement of barriers, curbs, fences) may also be required in the paving waiver to ensure that the unpaved area is not traveled_ A$50.00 per hour fee is charged for processing and review of the paving wawer. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKIIST. (SEPA- CHAPTER 43.21C RC1NI An additional environrt►ental checklist may be required by the State Environmental Poticy Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21c RCW to address possible adverse air po!(ution impacts that have not been addressed in the proponent's environmentaf c.hecklist for this retone_ SCAPCA will function as the Lead Agency for reviewmg air pollution impacts The processing fee for the SEPA Is $75 and must be paid at the time of the submittal. A 14-day public comment period is required by SEPA. The environmental check(ist will be circulated to govemmental agencies of jurisdiction for rewew and comment SEPA rules (Chapter 197-11-510 WAC) require the lead agency to use reasonatAe methods, as defined therem, to infotm the pubfic and other agenaes that an environmental document is being prepared or is avaiiable when required by SEPA n,les. The proponent is required to pay for the costs related to infortning the public and other agencies of the environmental document's exisbence CONSTRUCTlON RELATED REQUIREMENTS ~ Air polluton regulatons require that dust emiss+ons during demolition, construction and excavaUon prajects be oonvolled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of acfivity dunng certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be concrolled as well as emissions from all ather consvuction related actvit,es. ' Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. 1f tracking or spilis occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to Gean these surfaces RQONF. OF PROPERTY TO 8,2 - PARCELS 45133.0524 AND 45139.0540150 FT. EAST OF SULLIVAN RD. AND VAU.EY WAY Marah 28, 2000 Page 2 . • MAR-28-00 02.43PM FROM-SCAPCA 15094776828 T-763 P 03/04 F-892 Debns generaced, as a resuit of thrs project, must be disposed of by means other chan buming (i.e construcbon waste, vegetative waste etc.). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ' SCAPCA Regulation I, ARicle VI, and SCAPCA Regulabon fl, Anccte IV, address air pollution emission standards A!I emtission standards must be met • SCAPCA Regula4on I, Arnc{e IV may require registrauon with this agency depending upon the type of equipment or business that may be estabtished at the site An approved Notice of Construction suffices to meet this requirement. ' Depending upon the rype of business or equipment establisheci on site, same objectionable odors may resuft from this project SCAPCA's regulations state that effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a minimum. ' All SCAPCA permitting fotms and related requested infotmabon must be submitted to SCAPCA. The Spokane Buildcng Department will not forward matenafs to SCAPCA SCAPCA is an independent agency escablished by the State of Washington to administer air quality issues in Spokane Gounty. SCAPCA forms are awaitab{e at our office or can be downloaded from our website- www.scaaca orq. ° All solid fuel burning devices (fireplaces wood stoves, pellet stoves, eoc...) must comply with locaf, state, and federal n.,les and regulac,ons. F►replacc emission siandards go in[o effect January 1, 1997 New fireplaces musc be tested and tabeled in accordance wich procedures and criterra specified in the UBC Standard 31-2. SCAPCA Requlation I ARicte VIII Section 8.10 does not aIlow the installation of non{ettified sofid fuel aurnina devices in any new or existinq building or structure. unless the sotid fuel°burninq device is a cook stove, fireplace, or fumace as defined by SCAPCA Requlation 1 Article VII1, Section 8.03, or a non certified solid fuel burnin4 deviee which has been rendered Qermanently inoQerable. " WE WISH TO CONFER WITH TNE APPLICANT BEFORE A BUSINESS THAT IMPACrB AIR QUALITY 1S INSTALLED AT THE S1TE. THE ATTACHED SHEET S OWS THE TYPES OF BUSINESSES THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED TO 8E AIR POLLUTION SOCES AND w►ouLo REQUfRE AN AfR POLLUTION PERAAIT. PLEASE CONTACT CHARLES E. STUDER AT (5091477-4727 EXT. 107, APR1L WESTBY AT EXT.105. OR KEL_LE VIGELAND AT EXT. 106. = If the proponent or anyone else has questions conceming the above, please contact Charles E. Studer (509) 477-4727 ext. 107, April Westby ext. 105, or Kelle Vigeland ext. 106 at SCAPCA's office dunng the hours of 8:00 am & 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday. Failure to meet SCAPCA re4fflations ma y r+esult in delaysT c%svrie and civil anc!/or criminal sanctions. CLEAN A/R /S UP TO ALL OF US RE20NE OF PROPERTY TO p-Z - PARCEIS 45133.0524 AND 45133.0540150 FT. EAST OF SULLIVAN Rp. AND VAI.LEY WAY March 28, 2000 Page 3 . • f WR-28-00 02:43PM FROM-SCAPCA ,5994776828 T-763 P 04/04 F-892 13usinesses allowed in Svokane Countv B1. B2. or B3 Zoninq B1, B2, 83 = Dry Cleaners ~ Hospital / Medical Office (Medical Waste Incinerator) ~ Haaardous Waste Treatment and Storage (on - site) ~ Seroice Station 1 Gasoline dispensing facility ~ Below Ground Volatile Liquid Storage Tanks B2. B3 ~ Animal Crematory / Medical Waste lncinerator ~ Furniture Repair - Wood Stripping Facitity = Car Wash (Boilers) ~ Ceramics Shop (Curing Furnace) a Emergency Clinic (Medical Waste Incinerator) : Funeral Home (Crematory Incinerator) = Nursery 1 Greenhouse (Boiler) ~ Printing Facility ~ Power Equipment Repair Shop (Solvent Tanks) ~ Painting Operat;ons B3 ~ Carpenter Shop (Baghouse, Painting, Wood Strypping) ~ Commercial Composting Facility ~ Hotel ( Boilers / Heatittg units) ~ Race Track ~ Sandblasting! Cutting , . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE TO Spokane County Planning Department FROM Division of Engineering & Roads 5457Z +j j~1CJ DATE October 24, 2000 R~~Erf'~~t PROJECT UR-3 5 TO B-2 BUSINESS SPOKA6yk ~C, fNi T? FILE #ZE-0009-00 0 C T 1c~~►Hearing 11/15/2000 @ 9:00 pIVISIoN OF ~~~NN'Nr Sponsor/Applicant VERN & NiARILYN EDEN Section Township Range 13-25-44 Planner: JIM FALK Technical Review Date: 04/13/2000 @ 2-15 The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions cf Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valley Way for right-of-way. Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: 2. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System. 3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 6. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valley Way, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. CC: Applicant VERN b MARILYN EDEN Engineer/Surveyor Planner JIM FAI,K • ~ / A a Page 2 11/15/2000 Hearing / Review / 09/13/2000 TR ZE-0009-00 7 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 8 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70' foot Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 in width along the Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Valley Way. 12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 14. This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or site plan at this time. At such time a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit more detailed traffic information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation may be required for off-site improvements. END DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "vNS" WAC 197-1 1-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL OR.DINANCE FILE NUMBER: ZE-9-00 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: a zone reclassification on 1 75 acres of land from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3.5) to Community Business (B-2) for those uses allowed in the B-2 zone HEARING DATE AND TIME: November 15, 2000 at 9•00 a.m. APPLICANT: Vern & Marilyn Eden, 10408 S Madison Rd, Valleyford, WA 99036, 509/928-5914 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. 15523 and 15525 E. Valleyway, which is generally located 150 feet east of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley Way and fronts on the north side of Valley Way in the Northwest '/o of the Southwest'/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington Parcel numbers 45133 0524 and 45133 0540 LEAD AGENCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING DETERMINATION• The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file wrth the lead agency This information is available to the public on request This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding t6is DNS must be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m., November 13, 2000, if they are intendeci to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent to t6e contact person listed below. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By Jim Falk Trtle• Associate Planner Spokane County Division of Planning 1026 W Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260- 220 (509) 477-7200 . DATE ISSUED: October 27, 2000 SIGNATURE F---- -t- owk. OOMV1FNTS REGARDING F.NVIZONN1EVrAL OONCERNS CIVAIMMF, AT TI~ HEARIIVG APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, l st Floor, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal This DNS was mailed to 1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2 -~poh~nc,.~o,L1~.~.,~IV.dS10Ti.O~.Fggam~c~rir~~,~:canspo~;tat~ivn■L~'ti~tneeryrrg; ~~oi~~~~~taa~ci~.~ 3 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services, Bill Hemmmgs 4 Spokane County Division of Utilrties, Jim Red 5 Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims 6 Spokane Regional Health Distnct, Steve Holderby 7 Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry 8 Spokane County Air Polluhon Control Authority, Chuck Studer 9 WA State Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell 10 WA State Department of Ecology, Chns Merker 11. Fire Protection District No. 1 12 Central Valley School No. 356 13 Spokane County Consolidated Water District No 3 14 WA State Department of Transportation, Mark Rohwer 15 Town of NLllwood . t , OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 s110',M.C0"-`" "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE TO Spokane County Pianning Department FROM Division of Engineering & Roads SCo( ~ DATE October 24, 2000 PROJECT UR-3 5 TO B-2 BUSINESS FILE # ZE-0009-00 Hearing 11/1512000 @ 9:00 Sponsor/Applicant VERN & MARILYN EDEN Section Township Range 13-25-44 Planner JIM FALK Technical Review Date 04/13/2000 @ 2 15 The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first: 1 Applicant shall dedicate 2 5 feet on Valley Way for right-of-way Prior to the release of a buiEding permit or use of the property as proposed: 2 Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System 3 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 5 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 6 The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valley Way, which is adJacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 8 5-10 5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed CC Applicant VERN & NLnRILYN EDEN Engzneer/Surveyor Planner JIM EALK ri Page •2 . , •.11/15/2000 Hearing / Review / 09/13/2000 TR ZE-0009-00 • 7 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 8 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer Ali work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 10 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer 11 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70' foot Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12 5 in width along the Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Valley Way 12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work 13 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards 14 This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or site plan at this time At such time a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit more detailed traffic information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure The applicant is advised that mitigation may be required for off-site improvements END ! ~ i ~ S P O K A N E C O U1-7 T Y DNISION OF PLANNWG A DfV1SION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAItTMENT MICNAEI. V NEEDHAIv1, DIRECTOR GARY OBERG, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO• ~j~okane County Division of Engineermg c4z Roads, Scorl Engclhard, c/o Sandy ' '9WAR-7 rtl (11% Spokane County Division of Engineering & R.oads; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Divisio❑ of Utilities, Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry Fire District No 1 Spokane County Consolidated Water District No 3 WA State Department of Ecology, Chris Merker Town of M i llwood , v FROM Jim Falk, Associate Planne • DATE October 24, 2000 SUBJECT. Review and comments for the hearing of November 15, 2000 at 9.00 a.m. FILE ZE-9-00 DESCRLPTION: Rezone of 1.75 acres from UR-3 5 to B-2 for those uses allowed in the B-2 zone. STR. 13-25-44 (45133.0540, 0524) APPLICANT• Vern & Marilyn Eden Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency Please review and return any comments to me by November 6, 2000 wc Attachment: Notice of Public Hearing , 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE (509) 477-7200 • FAX (509) 477-2243 o TDD (509) 477-7133 l t r NOTICE OF PUBLIC .HEA►RING SPOKA,NE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLYCATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: _ Application: File No. ZE-9-00; a zone reclassification on 1 75 acres from Urban Residential-3 5(UR- 3 5) to Community Business (B-2) for those uses allowed in the B-2 zone. The applicants request an unrestricted rezone because they would like to use andlor market the property for any commercial use allowed in the B-2 zone. Hearing Date and Time: November 15, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. Place: Com.missioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Owner/Applicant: Vern & Marilyn Eden, 10408 S. Madison Rd, Valleyford, WA 99036; 509/928-5914 Address and Location: 15523 and 15525 E Valleyway, which is generally located 150 feet east of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley Way and fronts on the north side of Valley Way in the Northwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. The assessor's tax parcel numbers are 45133 0524 and 45133.0540. Comprebensive Plan: Urban (LT) Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5) Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Planning, as the lead agency on October 27, 2000 The comment period ends November 13, 2000. Division of Planning Staff: Jim Falk, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7228 HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Heanng Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a m. and 5:00 p.m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Jim Fa1k, File No. ZE-9-00. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3rd Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245. s - ~ t , OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE TO Spokane County Building and Planning Department FROM Division of Engineering & Roads DATE Apnl 13, 2000 PROJECT: UR-3.5 TO B-2 BUSINESS FILE ZE-0009-00/ ) Sponsor/Applicant JIM FALK Section Township Range 13-25-44 Planner JIM FALK Technical/Review Date 04/13/2000 @ 2 15 The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The following comments are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Technical Review Meeting This is not a complete set of comments Once all requested traffic information is reviewed and accepted final conditions will be prepared for the public hearing This application is not technically complete 1. We are requesting additional traffic information prior to this item being placed on and agenda for public hearing Please submit a traffic distribution study for review to determine if additional traffic studies are needed 2. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valley Way which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8 5-10 5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 3 Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet of Right-of-way along Valley Way. 4. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 5 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70 foot Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 80 feet is not consistent with that specified in the plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width along the Valley Way Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valley Way 6 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these CC Applicant V'ERN & NiARILYN EDEN Engineer/Surveyor Planner JIM FALK < a ~ Page 2 ' 04/13/2000 0009 ' utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work END , Spokane County Engineers Traffic Accident History Sullivan Rd & Valleyway Ave 1997-1999 Rd # Road Name M P Date Time Location Collision Type Seventy 1997 04597 Sullivan Rd 3 26 14-May-97 1650 at Valleyway Ave VehicleNehicle Entering at Angle Property Damage 1998 04597 Sullivan Rd 3 26 17-Ju1-98 0915 at Vaileyway Ave Same Direction/1 Stop Rearend Property Damage 04597 Sullivan Rd 3 26 10-Aug-98 1315 at Valleyway Ave VehicleNehicle Entenng at Angle Property Damage 04597 Sullivan Rd 3 26 19-Aug-98 1235 at Valleyway Ave VehicleNehicle Entering at Angle Personal Injury 04597 Sullivan Rd 3 26 12-Dec-98 1435 at Valleyway Ave Same Direction/1 Stop Rearend Property Damage 1999 04597 Suliivan Rd 3 26 18-Feb-99 1651 at Valleyway Ave VehicleNehicle Entering at Angle Property Damage M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 13, 2000 TO: Jim Falk, Current Planning FROM: Katherine Miller, E I T and Virginia Darrell, P E,Stormwater Utility RE: ZE-09-00 CC: During the building permit process the applicant will need to submit a drainage plan in accordance with the Guidelines for Stormwater Management. The SEPA Checklist indicated that existing structures will be removed. If grading of the site occurs during the demolition, the applicant needs to be aware that an erosion and sediment control (esc) plan is required for any permitted activities that disturb the land-such as a grading permit. The esc plan would need to be submitted prior to receiving a grading permit. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. C 1TEMPIze0900 doc Kimball, Sandy From Hemmings, Bill Sent. Tuesday, March 28, 2000 9 32 AM To. Falk, Jim Cc Engelhard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Sims, Brenda, Miller, Katherine, Darrell, Virginia, Parry, Ed Subject ZE-9-00 - Vern Eden 3-28-00 I received this proposal on March 27, 2000 I consider this proposal to be technically complete I know of no critical areas on this site I recommend current road and drainage standards for this zone change ~i~ ~ectsc~u~t~d, P5 Page 1 PAGE 1 13:59:13 27 MAR 2000 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 05110 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 FANCHER RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV .150 UPRR CROSSING U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 .160 LAKE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 .250 EASTERN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 DYER RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 05111 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 PARK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY AV .230 ELLA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .360 DICK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .480 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 20 .530 MESA LN (PVT RD) U 17 PAVED 20 .610 BESSIE RD U 17 PAVED 20 .740 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 20 .860 MARGUERITE RD U 17 PAVED 18 .920 HUTCHINSON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 18 .990 ARGONNE RD U 17 PAVED 40 1.050 MULLAN RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.120 WILLOW RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.240 LOCUST RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.380 FARR RD U 19 PAVED 14 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 1.490 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 14 05112 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 WALNUT RD U 19 PAVED 20 VALLEYWAY AV .060 HERALD RD U 17 PAVED 20 .190 FELTS RD U 17 PAVED 20 .310 R.AYMOND RD U 17 PAVED 20 .440 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20 .510 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 .690 PIERCE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 .790 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 .940 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.010 BATES RD (START) U 17 PAVED 30 1.190 UNION RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 1.450 SR 27 (PINES) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.840 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.950 MCDONALD RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.110 MCCABE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.200 BLAKE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.310 MAYHEW ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.360 MAMER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 2.470 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05113 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV .110 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .160 BANNEN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .170 BANNEN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .250 BEST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .260 BEST RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .300 REES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .500 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05114 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV .120 BURNS RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .150 BURNS RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .250 PROGRESS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .390 SOMMER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .770 MOORE RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.000 CONKLIN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.160 SHAMROCK (NONESTABLI U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 1.500 FLORA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05115 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 HARMOTIY RD'(END) U 19 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV .100 MCM I LI,,AN RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 40 . , PAGE 2 13:59:13 27 MAR 2000 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Refere,nce Qescriptio Road Log Info.......... .130 MCMILLAN CT (START) U 19 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 HODGES RD U 19 PAVED 40 05116 VALLEYWAY AV (LIBERT .000 WEST END TO MCKTNZIE R 09 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV .020 MCKINZIE DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40 .080 GARRY DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40 .190 MAIN AV (LIBERTY LAK R 09 PAVED 40 .270 MITCHELL CT(LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 .330 MITCHELL DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40 .390 MOLTER RD R 09 LIGHT BTTUM. 22 1.050 DUNBARTON LN {PVT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 1.280 LAKESIDE RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05117 VALLEYWAY CT (START) .000 LABERRY DR U 19 PAVED 37 VALLEYWAY CT (END) .100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 37 8 Records Processed - RECEVED . MAR 2 7 200 . ; S P O K A N E C O 6FMqWUFY ENGINEER PLANNNG A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Duector MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 2000 TO: [D~i~N 1 ~ ►~~ii~ ~i ~y ~"~c1~~~i~~Trr,n~~~,~+~h~~~Qn ~n ~rEn~, S-c. oi. ; :I'f~:~~'idlq, dt d&i_.4.1~~~ Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; Bill Hemmings Division of Utilities - information Management, Jim Red Divlsion of Utilitres - Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning, Paul Jensen Spokane Regional Health Distr►ct, Steve Holderby Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Air Pollution Control Aufhonty, Chuck Studer Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Gienn Miles Spokane Transit Authority, Christine Fueston WA State Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell WA State Department of Ecology, Chris Merker Spokane Counfy Fire District No. 1 Spokane County Water District No 3 Town of Millwood FROM: Jim Falk, Associate Planner -00* c SUBJECT: Zone Rec(assification for ZE-9-00 TECHNICAL REVIEW MEET(NG APRIL 13, 2000 AT 2:15 P.M. DIVISION OF PLANNING '1S` FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above app(ication and use the attached TECHrvIcaL REvtEVV MEETiNG FoRM for your comments The Division of Current Planning encourages you to attend this meeting The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me for the meeting The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meetrng and incfuded rn the Division of Current Planning file Thanks for your cooperation !f you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7228 NOTE: The Division of Current Planning wili now be circulating comments for SEPA Checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist for this project. Attachments Technicai Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, Vicinity Map, SEPA Checklist jf copy without enclosures to Vern and Marilyn Eden 10408 S Madison Rd , Valleyford, WA 99036 Rich and Donna Kiddoo 10408 S Madison Rd, Valleyford, WA 99036 D W and Kay We!don 10408 S Madison Rd, Valleyford, WA 99036 . 4 Spokane County Qivision o~ Current Planning Technical Review Meeting Meeting Date and Time: P+pril 13, 2000 ,7a 2 15 p.m Project File No.: 2E-9-00 Praject Lvcatian: Generally ]ocated 150 feet east af the interseetian of Sullivan Road and V'alley Way and fronts on #he north side of 1lal1ey VIJay in the SE 1/4 af Section(s) 13 & 14, Tawnship 25 N.t Range 44 E1Nd111, Spokane County: Washi ngtfl n. Comprehensive P€an: Urban Project Descriptian: The applica#ion proposes to rezone 1 75 acres of Iand frorn the current LJrbarr Residential-3 ~ (UR-3 5) Zone #a #he Community Business Zone (B-2) Parcel Na(s)' 45133 0524, 45133.0540 Owner(s): 1lerrr and Nfarilyn Eden 10408 S Madison Rd, Valleyfordr V11A. 99036 Rich and Donna Kiddoo 10408 S. Madison Rd., llalfeyfard, WA. 99036 D W and Kay Weldon 10408 S. Madisan Rd., Ifalleyford, WA. 99036 Applicant llern and f'UIariFyn Eden 10405 S. Nladison Rd,1lalleyford, WA. 99036 Prajec4 Pianner: Jim Falk, Associa#e Planrrer • ' , "'POKA.l,!E CaUNTY DiVISIom 4f= QUlLD1NG AND PLANNING `D , ZONE RECLASS1i I0%ATION APPLICATION f~ART ( A. GrweRnLIrlr-ornInriON ~ ga I O wn e r Q v icJ ct Y tv ~ DLN J),W . q (C \AJ e ~ cl o ~ , Pvl~aiimg Acfclre5s t(O / So N Ci!y V/~ ~ L y~() r r( State L✓4~ k Zip Cocfe Piione Ci (Work) (hlome) Fax Applic-cintJhgent 14- _D r, ~j2- Mailing Adclress 57.4 Cicv , S, zite Zip Code I'hone (Work) (i-lome) Fax 1f= A!'F't_ICAtJT IS NOT OWNER, INCI.UUE \,AIi2177EN OWNCR AUTh{OR{ZATION FOR APPLIC/1NT 70 Sr-_RVr_ nS (ZCPRESL-NTATIVE ~ f'rojectlp:oposal site area (acres or sq It ) Adjacent area owned or controlled {acres or sq ft ) ~5/S'~y.? os.21( 33,6 5-4D Ass-essnr's parcel numbers of proJecUproposai S s*r :,,4 C- 0 W-a P 1 13 2/ S a b-~- \A) .2f.s" o-f L~ d- S} o~ e ~N E~ a R °-F w i ti w,419 awfie-I •~,.~e~mr-!-~cal-~~~r.ni~e rs-e F~zi j~enl . '1`l~ S fio 5k i S-F7 w a~ S E C e~- o-~ w;, ' fiti ~ij-.,cr tA N fic PaB Sfreet adJiess of proposal E ° 15--C9~~~ w~`?~ Gxisting zone ciassihcation(s) arid date E-st2bUstied Lt ~ Existing L. se of property -14 P S 12, Proposed .,oning B-a Comprehensive pfan category School c{istrict Ce 1J7-Y4 JL U ify Water puweyor V e rce- Fire district Pioposecl use of properly Single fa;mly dwellings O Dur,ic>xl:s t) Ml«ifamily dwEliings O Manufac'tjred homes O 13usine:~7 ~ InciListriai O MIxed use O Uther ( ) - Descrihe _ List pre-v,ous planning cl+vision actions invc►1ving tllis property 13, I-rGAI_/.7-ONC RECLnSSiF{Cl1TIC)N IAlF-_iRMnTION Location o( proposal 3~~~ L LF- y ~-f~ c[iar#~ fowinsfiip 25^' i~an~e -cii-ne of Public road(s) providing ac.ce-;., \~'W L L e y w~L/ N . , ~I 7~.1 ~ ~~Vidll•s Of pIQ~7CIIy fInf1~li10 011 ~~llI~IIC, ioGcl SPa~N~ cni-JNTY MAR 16 2000 CUFRENT PLAJNNING ~IVla~ON '.ONE RFCI_A551F1CATION A. _ICATION , • F nGE 2 of 4 . Does llle proposal liave access to an arter<<i1 or planned arterial7 Yes No Name(s) of artenal roads VA L L f-`/ I_egc-il dFSCription of property for each zone reclassification proposed q5'/3 QS.,z q 1I 5 13 ~.Syo ~ii ~'JG~- ~ ~~-S 2. G+) 12- a[ ~ Z I F tc2.f kJ V-e wc~ P't' 13 z~ S Iz a~l,J a~ S'l a ~1 E C~2 ~ w l&_~` l~ t.J~G- N t-- TI~S `tO sL 15~►1 4.- SF C.o r~- I,, ) ~/Z ~ /~'P- T' l4 Al T'o t-d. 3 ~ ~l.EI1A1 r -z Existing xone(s) tit to proposed zone(s) for the following described property Atiacfi ieqai description stampecl by land siirveyor or provide below &e . If you cio not hold litle to the properry, kvhat is your interest in it? Wliat are the changed condihans of the area which you feel mai<e this proposal warranled'? , S~ r ko 4 u d. t N9 ~ v N~~ k~S ~ Se wer- ~~N~ \J~~ ~ Wliat imrack will U}e propose(i zone reclassihcation have on the adJacent properties? cl Wliat factors support the zone reclassification? ~ -C) e- ~ ~ . A 4 ~ w ~ V Q k17- c' N a I N~ iu 9 ~ ~ 1J~ D~ jL ~ ti-G i5 /!U ~,S S S 1-t, l~~ N ~Z ! 1v ~I • I Wliat n)E-asures do you propose ta miflgatE your proposal's impact on surrouncling lanci use? ~ .a _ a N rT AL P hA-, t-~~OL Zl. re4j y rro~~~~.~, 7 hc4 s~ N e s~ S e c n) SF>.,, , S r . 'ONC RECLASSIFICATION Ah, L.ICATIOh PAGE 3 of 4 , • PART II This section of ihe application will provicle the Division of [3uildmg and f'lanning staff with wntten verihcation thaf the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified Resuits of thE rreiiminary consuitalion shall be tncorporated in the proposal before final submittal lo lhe Division rIRC MnRSFI/lLL/FIRE OISTRICT n This proposal is within Fire Protection Distric,t No ~ 0 Adequate arrangements (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an adequate water system and facilihes for fire protectfon purposes C Recommended fire flow ; or unable to calculate now because use is not definitive, and will be determined at :imc; of builcling 'perrnit appiication_-;nare D Requirernents include -7-- SMw n /Yo,2444jv LoFriN ~ =vSP. ~ 0// r~-'~7 Fire Districl Signature/Title Date WA7CR PURVE YOR A Satisfactciry arrangements for ciomestic water and fire flow requirements -ilieve) {1lave nol) been macie (3 ~trrr-e~t~O m m e n t s_,,6l eAR ~jb ir 4444TKR ni.A, ol-I dt3 V.ALVr1WA y, , ~ 4WJ42;;i~2d t Q6zw eF DDaweo /D •~-4~ Water District Signatu; e/7i11e Date COUNTY ENGin'FEF2 ~anddrainage 11 preliminary discussion has tal<en place an,i cI aneral requirements for oads have been discussed with the applicant A Comments ~ Signature/'rjtle Date . ~ COUN7Y U7ILITIES n preliminary cliscussion has tal<en place ancl general requirements-for submiltal of tliis proposal (have) (have not) been satisfied 1'he design3ted wate~~rveyor for this site is r_ A Comments /~Jr Signature/Title Date REG14NA1_ 1-11LA1_TN DISTRICT A preliminar), discussion has talcen place z,rid ;,eneral requirements for submillal of this proposal (have) (havE: not) been satisfied n C o m mE: r►ts Ve-P~4- bi 0.1zf-- 01grlatunel1 dtle Date SCWER PURVEYOR ' t\ ~ rrcliminary ~ (liscussion has tal<en pIace andgeneral ren uire meDts-Eor"the ovr ision of pubiic . r- sewer are tind?rstooci by the applicant A Commcr.t:> _~.--ff J~ ~ ;)1g1)aturc!/7 title Date . • !rE.CL.PSSIFICATION /1, r'LICATIOIJ PAGE 4 of 4 - . , ON~,~abuYg3D wl ,o...o o F'ART I ( I • ~ o~0o ~ ~ 'l co ~e ~ SURVEYOR _It1FICAT{ON ~ ~ zom n ~ ~v. e cr ~ I, the under gnecl, a liIensed land :•urveyc~r, hzive completed fhe inform oi~ ♦ r~ ~r~v o_ ~ °•tD/S 1 E e'` Q 0`' zoninc~ ma Ir~d wril r legal descriptiQa 9 °~o ~sz C,J~oO 01 ua c s a u a O av .i ~ Signed Date Acfdress ~ • ~P2 KA A v~ • Phone r City 'S rO It.bov" State ~J /~-Zip PART IV SIGNATURF OR= PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTC-R C1r AUTI-I0RlZAT10N I, the undersigned, swear or affirm Lind2r ne«alty of per}ury that the above responses are made truthful{y and tci the best of my knowledge ( ftirtlier swQzir or afFil-m that 1 am tho owner of record of the area proposed for the previously identified lanci Lise action, or, if not the awner, altached herewith is written permission from the ouvner authorizing my actions on his/her bE halF. S i g n ecS D ate 102 ' .Z -2 Address I o Ll d ? A- P "I Sa AJ Phone ze- City _r State "O~'-~-~ Zip ~ 9 o Slgfl,a(Ur@ Of <ir►piicant or representative Date Skate of Wasfiington ) j SS County of Spokane ) c-k 02 000 Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on ihis day of M&r 1-17 , by -2s c-* ( I( ,e.,r NOta y Seal OFFICIAL SEAL - JAN15 E P07ESKY ~ otary F'i c in and for the State of Waslitngton esiciing NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE a t M y Commission Expiros Septombor 11, 2001 j - - - - - ~~ly f~ppointment expires P ART V TO E3E COPAPLETED BY TMC D1V{SION OF E3U1LOiNG ANO PI.ANNING Date submilted File number Date accepleci E3y Total fees Ctece;pt ilumber vuEl 041:20I1B A{'Pl Kls 4 61 " ~ • . 1"` ~j SI'OKANE ENVIRONMENTAL OR,DINANCE SE CTION 1 1.10.230-1- qECEIVED sPo~~~ ~~~NTY MAR 16 2000 CURRENT PL.ANNI[yCa pJyI5I0N ~ ~ ~ 0 < r , . sEpa Rules - , . - TO BE COWL= BY A?PL1C4Nf EVAL.UATIOFv FOR - AGENCY USE OINZY ' D. SiT'PLEMENI'AL SI.~,; FORNOtiPROJECi aCFIONS (do not u.se thas sheet for projec2 actions) Because the,se questions a.re ve.y 0ene:a1, it may be heinful to read them m conjuncrion vvith the list of the elemens oi the enviromment When answermg these quesrioas, be aware of the exient the proposal, or the types of activities U-ely to restilt IIom the prcFosal, would affect the item at agester intensity or at a faster rate. than if the pror•osal were not iraaIemented. ResDond briefl}+ and m general teZns 1. How would the proposal be 1lely to mcrease discharge to water; enussions to au; pro- duction, siorage, or rele~ of toxic or ba"*dous substances; or production of noue' - ~ e .5s '-1- r; Lc. "'J ~ . 4 N 5 6 ,4 ?4 S"7' e T d b e, c~ ~ S ck cz~'_9 Proposed me3sures to avoid or reauce such mczeases are: 4 h C~ 4P~}-~ b G r~ ' ,S T c ~~~c It A-J-~fti'a 5 d e % ► U o ~ U a. S~ ~ P. 2. How would the proposal be aeiy to affec: plants, ani-mzls, fisb, ar manne life? 6 veG h ~ A a) 1-4t Q k s') ~ Y' /k. 4 ` N `Q' ` 4~ `e' Z N ° 1, Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, auimals, fish, or marine li;e are: b I. 4 N 7'e<, 3. How would the proposal be lkely to deple*.e energy or nattu2l resources? e 5 5 ~tJ a~' 4 r Q. ~ w e S F c e S uJ s e d 4, It e,,-( b-~ 5~ t~ ~ r~.T e. ~ rt` ~ Cc tJ ~ S 1~1 o w w L'f- Proposed measures to proteci or conserve eaergy and natural resources are: q~'e 14 cU le eSsed How would the proposal be I-kely to use or a.ffert environsentally sensime arms or areas designated (or elizTole or under sudy) for governmental Prot~'cvon; suca as par'_ts, w-llderness, wild ana sc--mc rive:s, threateaed or endancyrred sDecies haditat histonc or culturai si►es, wetlands, flooaplains, or pri.me fazmlands? _ o Ga.`t' c. v t.1, Proeosed merstues to protect sich resources or to avoid or rea=e impzcts are• JU oIj~ N e e C(e~ WAC (~l1519S) [Ch. 197-11 `V:AC-p. 63] . t ~ . SEPA Rules _ ~ . TO BE COMPL.EIFD BY APPLICAiNI' EVA.L.UATION FOR ` AGE?iCY USE ONLY 5. How wouid the proposal be hikely to afi'e..t land and shoreline use, nnclueing whether it would allow or encouraae land or shoreiine uses incomvati-ole with existina pL3ns? ~ b~er Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use inmacts are: 6 How would the proposal be aely to increase demands on transportanon or public services and ur,liues) e~ prY bq,5e5 by • {4.7~~d N ~ s s ~ r e S r N ~y rt S o i ~ S" i N SlZ, ~ S~ v-V eS N P~ r r' y P:oposed measures to reducc or respond to such demand(s) are: C~~ Y -5 ._0 0t-, td- we ~ c o'.ft e- C c4. S 7.'a ir~c. e 1- S 9 3 e e r- G 4r p a <<~` L 5 a. ~fJ L x Ge S S ~ l. r e '~rt: cs w ~ ~ e~ o C~ t,~- ► G k ~ e ~ ~ G ~.S ~ • ~ b ~ 1C f 1J ~ 7. Identi"ry, if possiole, waether the prooosai may contlict wita local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the ~ protection of the environmrnt d 1J ~ 1 0~ e R.i c'Q-'C11. • r [Ch.197-11 SVAC--p. 64] WAC (4/15/98) a ` - . . . , SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ' WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11 10.2330(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse unpacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTR UCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental unpacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. . You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Comolete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later , . . Soiiie questions ask aDOl1L governmenLai rcbuiaLiUM, buc.rL aS GUILIlb, snoreiine, ana lanamarx designations. a*:swer tnese question :f you can. 'if yoL'nave proolerr_s, r_^_P bOver.n^Zer,t= agencies cxa assist yoU. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a penod of time er on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to expla.in your a.nswers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROIECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." I\s ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMEI`7TAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively Spokane Environmeatal Ordinance Checklist Page 2 of 21 !rT'faM.1f•~" Mj~ti ' tY•(+C • . 4 A. BACKGROL3iND FII.E/PROJECT NO. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable. Aa_ ~ .I p.~ E 1 5- s.2 3 ai~~ E fS s-.2 s V4 ,c ~ ,E s ,~-4.~R ~~~.~►,c~-E ~-ri-dt. • , 2. Name of applicant: \J e y IV 4-,W q V 14. Al It/ 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ~ o 40 Y w h h 5 . f <1 Y0 3 C _ 1-23- .S-9 oy V e v N a N ,L , ,F b .~x) , 4. Date checklist prepared: 9 AgCnCr reqses;.ing checklist: ~ Q a1< ck tl- e. C a~-c N T Y ~ i V t$ to ic! o~ ~/N 4 c N 6. Proposed timinc, or schedule (including phasing, if appLcable): L°_ oZ Oo o , Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Paae 3 of 21 1 1 1 A. BACKGROUND (concinued): ' 7. a. Do you have any plans for fiiture additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal) If yes, explain N 0 b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. . .S~"4- 7- ~ 5 7 r c. ~_S' ~ cc u e ~ ~ ~ ti 0 4 (J ct A1 W ~ S 7'e. ~9 ~V c~ W ~ S 7'ip W~'" Y i" ~ 2. 7~v ~J Y q.T ~ • r c A. s - - ~ sL LL.,-7'' iJ us ~ L t, b~ 1~ s S t'k aj e w T~4 9 Do you know whethet applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposaP If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known I) bNel ~ ~C-'--7 ot el CL Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21 r a J . . , A. BACRGROIJND (continued): 11. Give a brief, complece description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the pro)ect and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page ~ ~ e. 2 0 rj ~ Y' o tit 5 1 ~ 4 C, re S ~ ~v s' % ~ . PCA Y c ~ L s W.~ 3• d.~~ y ~-t ~ l3 3~. o.s-ya S-~'2~ r s-~T ~ f,~ - t~~--~ r- o f 7" !s ? 1t S 7'-a 54 1 S -f w 6 ~ S C a j- Q 4-- a -p 9, 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the ra.nge or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, _ site plan, vicinity map, and topographic rriap, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any perirut apphcation related to this checklist. ~~5~.3 ~ ~•iss'~-s~ V14 1- L, Fy wAY ad e S c~- ~ P T 1 b!f .4 b ~Lj e. v 13. Does the proposed action lie ivithm the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The e Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Counry's A5A Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries) S A P Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist a~e 5 of ? 1 ~ . , Evaluatlon For ' AQency Use Only , , . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENI'AI. EL.EiMENTS. 1. EARTH a General description of the site (circle one) fl , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? e~ / o c What general rypes of soAs are found on the site (for e:cample, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ~ ,I Y a V e~ { o i S o er T o A r o~-% , - „ /J a Prt^ 2. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstablP soils in the immediate vicuuty? If so, describe. e Describe the purpose, rype and approximate ouantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill S o.tit e ~ Ir q.Cl. F► e4 N o ~ c/,, L ~ Y a P - f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. . 1Q o i-r's ii e, T 1~ ~ d F~I Na, WATe r S'e a' .S t, T (1) .1? A--V d,~" l 5 N o S~a N d. r tJ ~ w ~4 ~ e r, ~ Spokane Environmental Urdinance Checklist Pa~e 6 of 21 . r J Evaluation For • , Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONVIE\'TAL ELEMENTS (Continued). g About what percenL of the site will be covered with unpervious surfaces after project construction (for e:cample, asphalt or buildings)~ h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1JaNe NecZcLp_cl . !UD 1Z ro St- ati! , ~ 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e , dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construcuon and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. i-t k. . ~►~cb~S?~.r.~, r,iy Ce, 11 s -rrC.- C-T. I a►LJ o da~ W o~. L~(. b~ l e.5 5 7'' JC. ~J 7- J c. J , N o ~t e a. S' ti r~. 61 e_ Y a-K a- c,--r- CD 5. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? ii so, generaiiy ciescribe. c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or ocher impacts to ai:, if any: - ),J ~ N ~ A1 e c cL e- c-, cQ X' 6 ~ ~ ~ S - , r ~ L bc<> C 6~► i r e~~ e.~ b~r /k o~ 5~ r~_ Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 of 21 ~ . Evaluation For ' Agency Use Only , B. ENVIRONMEVTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the irnmediate vicLnity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or nver it flows into. N 0 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and artach available plans K) o 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fdl material. ~J a tJ e,. 4) Will the proposal require surface water tivithdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ti a 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 06 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pave 8 of 21 . -y . { . . . , P ~ ' • , Evaluation For Agency Use Only - . B. ENVIRONMEiVTAL ELEMEiVTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b Ground. 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or wd1 water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 1J k *,Aj A- KI CL S e'''v A- -t- ~ r o P 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment faciliry. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. r~ b IJ ~2 ~ 4,..1- c e k 1 t-~1 ~ -e ~ 6 N 2. 1~ c e~ N 5 AV ~ s e P~~ C- TA ns ~ w c ~ b ~ 1r e.~.t a v w Q e~ s- ~ S~-,~ t~S p4rcw r S~ r"v a-d. .L' ~ ~4 G~V L j aef T 3) Describe%y systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, "4 wczy~ installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the , system and the types of materials likely to be dlsposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). L1 F~ G s 1.~ Q. 4- ~ • 14.14, b~ ~L e s,~ S e•~v e r 4. q.~ _ u --zL w.4- 5 s jV r a.~~ ~L Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21 ~ . . Evaluation For Adency Use Only _ . , B. EiNTVIRONME\TAL ELEMENTS (Continucd)• 4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks) If so, what types and quantities of matenals will be stored? rV ~ S) What protective measures wdl be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chernicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep cherrucals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 36(3)? p tiv t I-L- 0 \A1 <~J,. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Wliere will this water flow? Will this warer flow into other waters? If so, describe. ~ pcc~.rS , 2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the siee in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system discharging Lo surface or groundwater) N ~ 3) Could 'waste materials enter ground or surface ivaters) If so, generally describe. ?IJ D Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 of 21 , ~ . 1 J . . Evaluation For Agency Use Only , ' B. EiNVIRONMENTAL ELEYIENTS (Conhnued): , d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aouifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on eYplanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 36(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist) PV ~ ~ J~ ~ cL ed 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ~ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, nulfoil, other other types of vegetation u. `v,7L'iaz 111LJ\.l aillll 2lriGllIlt vi vcgetation il~ vk, i I-uiv vi aiLCi %~%~.a? S.S-r c b a~ 1/, e.itc., a.J 401 -`e r e d 6-f 4~[ V'egq- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 1~ o ~ e d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: S a.K. -e, 5~. r~,, b S a, N-rL P 4 ct, AJ T S T a be, A d Ql ~ ~1 4 L. b Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklisc Page I 1 of 21 ' Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIR4\TMEIVTAL ELEMENTS (Connnued) 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and arumals which have been observed on or near the site or are known ta be on or near Lhe site birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other v 0 fish. bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: KJ 6 tj Q_' b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or iiear the site NdIJ e, c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, eYplain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~ Sti 1' F~ 5 w i~. b~ o 47 ? Vc, c7- b ( dS ,45 -/"A evre 14 rz N c. ^J P__ 1Va~. 6. ENERGY aND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs) Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. p~ec7'YIc,IV4.7'4hq~. ,gQS ~4 ~cI 5~<414 s~ ~aN ~ - ~ b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties) If so, generally describe. , 5 o c~ S e. 1 i 7'. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21 ~ . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONME\TT AL ELEMENTS (Continued). ' c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: T-[ 1y e- j. ► 'ff It,7' _s' e ~ e~ r ~j e g1 T' J ~ ~ e- n-1f !A' ? a_ rJ r ,Q- i~-- c r s 'W k e~ --2, fV e C.e S S 4, r Y, 7. EN`VIRONVIENTAL HE.UTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic cherrucals, risk of fire and e:cplosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ~J ~ 1) Descnbe special emer ency services that ~night be required. N o ,J ~ ~ C) w ~ J ~ ~ ~ 1'' ~2 5 -r ccr 1o M 1 5 ~ t~ L a cjz:: 5 s ~o -n Proposed measures to reduce or cer.troi =-v::^r.:r_enta.~ health hazards, if any: v c~ez. N5~ N t N~ ik e►^ ~ ~ C o ~vt ~ 4-7 L. ~0_ N~ uc, s~ w~4,4 - bC,, &k_ Y G c~. Gl.. G T b Noise 1) What rypes of noise e-cise in the area which -rnay af_fPct your r rojPc'r ({01' PX2mi le: trattic, /equipment, operation, other)? ~ 7~l. i'S p rd Tc_ G~ c~- lv b /l( e_4.5 L-°-~ Z7 1! 1S 7~ c,T r a~ 41~J ct v, -`'e. r i a, 1, . N e Gk :::L 0~ Q ~ X Q e cT~, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project " on a short-term or a lon~ term basis (for esample: traffic, construction, operation, other)) Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. C a~~ T 1- c7 c a tJ 1~1 a i s'e. . , /Li a iJ y- 4, F`P_ d,,5 e 4-J Q, t_ Y o/1'L Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21 . ~ Evaluation For " Agency Use Only . , B. ENVIR0iNVIE\iTAL ELE?VIENTS (Continued) 3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any• LS Zt el lk. IL d ~ . r-, L e {s S ~ a ~ s 4(a ~-1- 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and ad)acent properties? A dSo~~~ ~~'9 S,TeS 6 rJ 3 -57r~y'-Sc5k- Y - ~ - - C o~c, ict, e!~ C c~'-4 L~, C i1 1. 5 r ~ N y if N c ~t 4~_S b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, descnbe I~ 6 r S e 5 Gc. N cL -t k C r 4. N~~<< S f1- N d- 4- Rn r Se- o a. L. I a 1^ cl 'z AJ 44- 1 c. Describe any structures on the siLe. 2 0~ A-i. 1 4 y k 6Lc. S e t 3 d. Will any sLructures be der:zolished? If so, whlch~ 'y e- ,S A 4 Z e. What i., the current. cUzlir c.lasbiiic.auoIL vi tiic site~ 119 ~ i li~ 3.5 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of 21 J .y Evaluation For Aaency Use Only B. ENVIROI\`VIE\1TAL ELEMEVTS (Continued)• f What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site) Q If applicable, zvhat is the current shoreline master program designation of the site> ~ I) e5 7' A 1) PL h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximaiely hoR- many people would reside or work in the completed project? Nb0 e- ~es - 4.~. .~'Pproximatr'iy ho«t mz.Y r"oFle wou 'id tlir I-VIT1P1CtCd pro; r-cr. dispiacr?. ~ U 1i e, e N y w t -v . . k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: ~ l. Proposed meastires To ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: T-T Ls Gld:5[ a ✓1 e Y) ic l; 1- 4~ ~i~ r • QC..J ^ -ra bL4 S S~ r v N c a r~ L GJ ti. 1r r~ ~u d~~ 5 l T. ,4 e, e,Y; Spokane Environmental Ordlnance Checklist Page 1~ of 21 4 ~ , . Evaluation For Agency Use Only . B. EiNVIRONMEIVTAL ELFr'VIEIN'TS (Conunued)• 9. HOUSIl\ G a Approximately how many uruts wouId be provided, if any) Indicate whether high, rruddle, or low-lncome housing iJ c 13 e- b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eluminated) Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing w tJ ey b L cLc_ Z~~ ^A C v iJ ' •J c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. ~,3 G L~ N e e cl- e.~. ~ ~ ».~'~CS a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not includinQ antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? /Jo'~'' N ~ w ~~o ~ ti b. What views in the immediate viciniry would be altered or obstructed? c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any• Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 16 of 21 I' • ' • Evaluation For ~ AQency Use Only , B. E~TVIRONMEl\TTAL ELEMEN"!'S (Continued): 11. LIGHT AND GLARE ° a. What rype of light or glare wi11 the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur) 1v o 2~ b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NaN~ c. What ex-istino, off-site sources of hgbt or glare may affect your proposal? u. in i vpJacd rnedsui e. to reduc e or conttvl ilgiii, ajiu gid2"e 1i11paCt5. ►f ailv. . t-+ t,l ~✓C e. Z 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the irnmediate vicirury? P 4,4, 't' e- X e e C- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. lv a • Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of 21 a 1 . . Evaluation For' AQency Use Only _ B. ENVIRONMENT AL ELEMEIVTS (Continued): c. Proposed measures to reduce or control unpacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the proJect or applicant, if any: N cA i., e- 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURr1L PRESERVATION a tlre there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site) If so, generally descnbe. N~ b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N o " -e, r • ~ ~ i: cp:,se? .:ica;u; cs tc rcd~cc or co:.trol impacts, :f 1ny. 14. TRkti1SPORTATI0N a Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access r^ rt°.!sr=ng St:'°°t systetr_. Show on site plar_s, !f ar_y ~ L 1.. IL i. v Y` ~f 4 1,.J ~0 ~4-u-p Li o -t- c~ ~o ~ei -reY'ST4.T¢ S y b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approYimate dista.nce to the nearest transit stop? ~T ~.5 ~C Y'v 2~7 bU bic,SPS el ~ Spokane Environmental Qrdinance Checklist Page 1 S of 21 I J " . . Evaluation For Agency Use Only , . B. ENVIRONIVIE`iTAL ELEMENTS (Continued). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? ::~7 o u~ e~. 4 - ` J~ o FJ Q. E. ~ 7~► ~t T2 c1 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). ~J a . e. ~X~ill the project use (or occur in the immediate vicuury oo water, rail, or ar transportation? If so, generally describe. ~ a f. How many vehic>>la!- xrips Per (iay would be generated bv the completed pro;PCC? If known, indicare when peak olumes would occur. ~ a~' ~ ~ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportauon impcu, if any: _ A) e-c.'r 4'y e. p -t- S a--~ C 4- p 4.. r y 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)) If so, generally describe. N 6 4- 4- A U~t i 1. 4 b r~ , ~ Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pa~e l 9 of ? 1 . • 1 Evaluation For Agency Usc Only . , . B. EivVIRONMENT:AL ELEVIENI'S (Continueci). b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any N a N~- cL ed 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently ava.tlable at the site; ectrici , ~ tura gas, ate , r 1 rvice e~o~e, ~fitary sew , s pti~yste , ot er. / ` b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utihty providi.ng the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. , V Q y" e_ Ne 4~'r C. SIGNATURE y waa~► ~V Lll%. U%..~L V♦ I, *l-:P ,.rdP:s:gr.ed, swear under zhe penalty of per;ury *hat tre above rPsr~^sPs ~~P •^~a° --a 1-~} ^c my knowledge. I also understand that, should there he any willfiil misrepresPntar_ion or willfi.l 1?ck of ~till disclosurP on my part, the aaencv may withdraw any determuiation ot non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this che;.:dist. Date: P e ~ub ~ roponent: tI L Proponent: _ (Please type or print) (Sis ature) Address: -/u A 0 1-5 City, State, Zip ~ ~ e Y '4 A phnne: 5 7 11/ c1 Person completinj the form• Uy_~e.~ -f Date: Phone• / z Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 20 of 21 . FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checkllst. . Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff• A Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a deterrrunation of nonsignificance (DNS). B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for che current proposal and recommends a nvttgated determination of nonsignificance with conditions (MDNS). C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a deterrrunation of significance (DS). REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE Spokane Environmental Orchnance Checkllst Page 21 of 21 SPOKA►NE C LN'i'Y DY.rISION OF , ~ BU' ~ DING AND L -.,eDt ENFOR 1026 WEST BROADWAY AvENUE • SPORANE, WA 99260-0050 ; (509) 477-3675 - n ~ J ( SrrE INFORMATION . PRDjECT INFORMATToN ~ 5ite Address: 1 S 525 E VALLEXWAY AVE Ptoiect Numba: 00001869 Inv: 1 Isste Datex _ VERADALES WA 99037 'errnft TTse: ?.E-9-00 submtttal Parcel Number. 45133 4524 ` 5nbdivision: UNKNOWN Applicant: EDEN ET-AL, V L Block: Lok 10408 S MADISON RD Zoning: UR 3 Urbtu►Remcieatia13,5 VALLEYFORD, WA 99036-9756 phone: (509) 928-5914 Owner: EDEN ETAL, V L Contack Vem Fdeu Address: 10408 S MADISON RD 10408 S. Madisna V.ALLEYFORD, WA 99036-9756 Valleyford, WA 99036 phone: (SOg) 928-5914 -;etLacks - FronN I,cft: Right: Rear: Inspectar: DAN HOWARD Water Dist: _ Gropp Name: ZE-9-00 , Project Name: ° C PERmncs) - - j Zone Change Contmctor: Ltanse ~ ERg REj1I~EW Szoo.oo ~v~xorrnEvT~. ~w $75.00 REZONB TO B-1, R 2 $1,670.00 UTII.TITF.S REVIEW $100.04 W Tatal Perrmlt Fee: $2,245.00 ( PAYMENT SUMMARY , f 1 NOTES n ~ PERMIT Processed By: WRIGH'I', RAE Prfntsd By: WENDEL, GLORIA 1'ran Date Recea t~„# a ment Au~t 03r12/2000 1923 $2,245 00 Total Fces AmnnntPAid AWunt(JV~n $2,245 04 $2,245,00 $0.00 J - ♦ r , ~ . , Spokane eoun'ty Fublic Wopks Department ! Divison of Building & Planning . ' Receipt Receipt Nuntber: 1923 Cuslomer Number Pro~ects ` ~ Full Project 11~br Inv NLr _-;~F~eP„' t~,_ ~ ' G 'FFY~ ~ ~PAID Pi»t 00001869 1 t2,~~~:'{lOkFi ~~~2,~~6"~d~ ~i~~0'~~ $2,245.00 ~ r I u~ tC' y ~ ~ u r li ~'I 7~ pJ ~G Total: ~'~;a~$1Q0.1►`.~ $2,245.00 Miscellaneous Items Tota1 PAID: $2,245.00 f Tender " S L ~ ~ ~ ~r L i ~i ~ ~ hi , , , ~ .w ~ ~ ~~!~r~ y ~J►a!~`~' TENI)BRED ~,G'~~~fC~~'~• ~~~~~~~~~~~j~,~ 21245.00 ~inivy Total TiTMERED: 2,245.00 Over / (Short) $0.00 ~ Change $0.00 Notes: ?Sran Date / Time: 0312212000 10:21:04 A By: GWendeO Logon User; gwendel Statiore: GINENDEL override By: . Priftted: 031221200010:21:32 AM Page 1 oJl , . . ~ MEMORANDUM ~ DATE: May 9, 2000 TO: Scott Engelhard CC: Ann Winkler, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. , Jim Falk, Spokane County Planning FROM: Steve Stair S'~ S SUBJECT: Traffic Distribution Letter for Eden Property Rezone ' (ZE-09-00) dated May 8, 2000 SPOwf cmwY This distribution letter is for a rezone and is not accompanied with a specific development proposal or site plan making it difficuit to determine the true traffic impacts from developing this site As you know, we have used distribution letters for development proposals in the Sullivan Rd. corridor as a basis to assess pro-rata participation in the construction of the loop-ramp at the Sullivan Rd. Interchange of 190 The distribution letter for the Eden Property Rezone assumes the highest and best use as an 18 7ksf shopping center However, a more intense traffic generator would likely be a bank, fast food restaurant or convenience store, etc In addition, the discussion of pass-by traffic would be better descnbed and analyzed as diverted trips. Nonetheless, I recommend we defer the detailed review of traffic until a specific development proposal (site plan and/or building permit request) is submitted. At that time, a more realistic evaluation of traffic, pro-rata participation in the loop-ramp and any impacts can be determined if you have any questions, please feel free to bring them to my attention. . , Z~..~~ . Associat~s Inc. ' ' - - FOO RMERLY n.e~.wcarmmi..r .............,.a 7 i: May 8, 2000 707 West 7th Suite 200 ~~C W.O. No. S000179 Spokane, WA 99204 M,q y D 509-458-6840 ~ sp O 8 509-458-6844 Fax ~ Jim Falk OkqN~C Spokane, wA - Denuer, co Spokane County Engineering ~~iyTy 1026 W Broadway ~FFq Spokane, WA 99260 ~ , ~ RE Trip Distribution Letter for the Eden Rezone Property Dear Mr. Falk Per the 1999 Road Standards of Spokane County, we have prepared a trip distribution letter for the Eden property, located northeast of the corner of Sullivan and Valleyway. This report will follow the draft standards for doing traffic distribution letters as put forward by Spokane County Engineering. ~ Project Description The parcels proposed for this rezone are located east of a power sub-station which lies on the northeast corner of Sullivan / Valleyway. The Car Toys site lies ~ in the northwest corner adjacent to the site The site has no direct access to Sullivan, but a cross-access through the Car Toys site would allow access to ' Sullivan ~ I ~ At the present time, the 1 72 acre site is in two parcels and is in use for two , single family homes, one on each parcel The site is presently zoned UR-3 5 (Urban Residential - 3 5 units per acre) ~ A blanket rezone (rezone without a site plan) is requested from the existing UR- 3 5 zone to the B-2 (Community Business) zone No proposed uses have been identified for the site Therefore, this traffic distribution letter is based upon a "highest and best use" of the property under the proposed zoning Vicinity / Site Plan A vicinity map is included as Figure 1 and a plan of the existing property is included as Figure 2 This proposal is for a blanket rezone, and no specific site plan has been developed for the property Trip Generation Due to the unidentified commercial nature of this proposed rezone, Land Use Category 820, Shopping Center was chosen from the Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition published by the Institute of Transqortation EnQineerinQ for the site Shopping Center covers a wide variety of retail establishments. For trip Planning generating purposes, it was assumed that the 1.72 acre site could accommodate Engineering 18,740 square feet of retail space This is approximately 1/4 of the total parcel Architecture square footage The resulting trip generation rates are shown on Table 1. Landscape Architecture Land Sur~eying Formerly IPE , . . Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May 8, 2000 Page 2 Table 1- Trip Generation Rates and Volumes for Shopping Center on Eden Property AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour KSF Vol @ 1.03 Directional Vol @ Directional trips per Distribution 3.74 trips Distribution KSF 61% In 39% Out Per KSF 48% In 52% Out 18 74 19 12 7 70 34 36 _ Aver=a9e,Daily Trip Ends-(ADT) KS`F Rate Total ADT , 18 74 42.92 804 The traffic to and from this site would likely be made up of new (destination) traffic, pass- by/diverted traffic and possibly shared traffic Since a site plan has not been developed, shared trips will not be considered. Pass-by/diverted trips will be from Sullivan Road only To quantify pass-by trips, the Trip Generation Handbook published by the Institute of Transqortation Enqineers was consulted No information is available for the AM peak hour Therefore, it was assumed that all AM peak hour trips are new (destination) trips Very little pass-by information is available for shopping centers of this size, but the PM peak hour rates are summarized on Table 2 from Table 5.4 in the Trip Generation Handbook for the smallest shopping centers which provided pass-by information Table 2- Pass-by Information for PM ' eak Hour for Shopping Center Located on Eden Property Sizei(ksfl Primary trip Notin-Pass-by Diverted Pass-by Trip Trip Linked Trip 9 - 41 - 59 ~ 45 24 - 20 56 17 - ~ 34 - 66 44 - 49 - 51 Average 24 41.3 20 58 ~ , r . , c Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May 8, 2000 Page 3 Based upon the information in the Trrp Generation Handbook, if a commercial use was located at this site, approximately 58% of the traffic would be pass-by traffic. A summary of trip generation characteristics of the Eden property with the pass-by information included is shown on Table 3 Tab/e 3- PM Peak Hour Trip Types and Volumes for the Retail on the Eden Property KSF PM Peak Directional Distribution - t Hour Volume Entering Exiting 18.74 70 34 36 New 30 14 16 Pass-by 40 20 20 If the site was to more fully develop into housing under the existing UR-3.5 zoning, it would likely develop into 6 single family residences which would generate 5 AM peak hour trips, 6 PM peak hour trips and 70 ADT trips Therefore, the rezoning of the property will generate a net increase in traffic to the surrounding transportation system of 14 AM peak hour trips, 24 PM peak hour trips (not counting pass-by traffic) and 734 ADT trips Trip Distribution Traffic distribution during the PM peak hour for the new (destination) trips is expected to be 10% to/from Valleyway west of the site, 10% to/from Valleyway east of the site, 20% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 60% on Sullivan to/from south of the site. Traffic distribution during the PM peak hour for the pass-by/diverted trips is expected to be 70% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 30% on Sullivan to/from south of the site Therefore the total trip distribution for this site is 5% to/from Valleyway west of the site, 5% to/from Valleyway east of the site, 50% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 40% on Sullivan to/from south of the site Access to the site was assumed to be by using a short section of Valleyway, from Sullivan to the site, east of Sullivan. Conclusions and Recommendations It is not anticipated that this project would have any noticeable impacts to the surrounding transportation system. No more than 18 vehicles will be added to any single segment of Sullivan and that is to the south of the site New traffic to the north is expected to be 6 vehicles, with origins mostly within the surrounding neighborhood, south of I-90 and possibly from the residential areas along Sullivan north of I-90 and north of Trent , . r . • . Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May 8, 2000 Page 4 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please let me know and I will be happy to address them Sincerely, CLC Associates, Inc. ~ . . Ann L. Winkler, P E. ALW/alw encl - Vicinity Map - Plan of Existing Site cc Scott Engelhard, Spokane County Engineering (via Jim Falk) Vern Eden, Project Sponsor file i !//i /7V1 ~ S Li • ► _i"- • • .ullivan Park i _ E INDIANA a O • ~ - . _t.__ North ~ MI z w w ~ ~INT ; - ~ • 1 7 ONE j E SHA z ~ z ~ ~ ~m O M~SS~O >M T TAl pO ,L N AL O ~ m o c~i h Branch Canal ~ m z E NIAL~ON L co ~ ' E gROADWAY E E SORINGFIELD J E SPRINGF ELD Z Z C) O E ALK E OLIVE °y U) < AL~I RD z Z ~ V LLEYWAY 0 w p ~ ~ p m E~~ALLEY 1/~ AY ~ Q p E o ~ w E NIXON z- Q ~ w EMAN W Z ~ J t z Y 0- z m cn E MAIN E MAIN g w W Z w Pr-o~;ect Locatio~ I E Z = ~ E RIVER IpE ~ z E t~tIVERS ~ E~PRAGUE ~ E SPRAG! E SF ~ L ~Ver-~d~a~l ~ z Z Zi~ sT Vera ~ T co E3RD ~ E 2 N D -o~,,••~ - ; - , ; , ~ . x cn ' ' • D U) G) c E 3R~- ~TH ~ 9 ~w ~E 4TH 1 ~ tn , E 4TH r iy 5TH o m D~ ~ ~E 5TH D cn E 5 H L l!(n ;0 6TH ~ ~ ° E TH < ~ 6TH L ~shelley Lak v ~ i v ~Fn D 1TH ~ E 7TH o ~ ~ ~~~t' ; E 8TH oo m E~TH WF~ V1Clnlt Mp a. z ~ E 9T~ ~ -C~ , y ~ .9TH z o (n co m m w ~ o E 11 TH F I-SCHOOL Q - ~ 11 TH G~ o~~ ~ ~ _ Q _ ~n w Q' m w 0 ~m E 12TH u Z ~ ~ 13T ~ m m 4~ < ~ ~ 0 X g co Z ~ 14T1 I~ (n _.,,,E 13YLH 74 ~ k(n E 14TW ~ 0 -f 15Tq ~ 15THf m~ ~ ~ 19aR t)e~Qr~e St~eet.Q,tlu; US,6 E 16TH ~ m z~~ m ~ E 16TH 1 ~ i ~ - ~ ~ ~ R. 3, , _ ~ ~ . I, b ` . ~ ~ ~ T • ! A1 I M ~ 1 3 h ~ n i ~ y f ~ 0 7 ~ rt _ I ~v e~- ~ i ~ • ♦ ~ ` ~ ~K'L57+~a ~ , , ~ ~ . I~~ SWed . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; i ~ ~p b~ i au e r~M , - j I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ! I I i i ' ~ ~ j ~ I ~ I I ~ + I ~I ° (J1 ~ ~'X+S"~rbp ~ ; , , ~ * }i~kS~ ~ ~ , r , ~ I ~ ~ , w. , ~ p be i ~ C r ,v ~d. 0 , a i~t,i~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,~Ned fi~ 'i ~ ~ b e e ~ ~ e~` i . rJ i b 1 , i , . ~ ~ ~ ~x,sr~~wy ~ ~ ~ Ili ~S ° ~ ~tvP ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ f~a4S~ ~ A~ ' ~t~+e ' ~ , . . i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~o . ~ s ~ ~ , ~ ' i ~ ~Y~' ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~9 a; F- 0 i ~~4 ~ Q aS/ ~Ai. , ~ ,33 ~ u~ ~F~ LL ~ a ~ 1~ e.94L ~~r ~ ~ ~ i, V ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~r~ , ~ ~ . r ! ~r ~ .SCfs ~ ~ ~ ' - ' ~ ~ • ~ , ~ j ~Ae~~rwAy s~-~ ~ . . ' • ~ N;N ~ s u,~ 3.S , a ~'o ~X 57, g zo ' ~ ~ ~N~N~~ 7 aN ~ ~ Frop;,sea r.oneisj 1 nues ar %,q FU- ~~l~~l~lJr I ~~L ~ ~ ~ 1:x~urtpcDnefsl 1 PrrpY,ea Y.ane~s ~ $Plan f ,7? ,4 t re ~ e t a ~ ~ c~ . ~ , r~,v ~ 3.~ ~ -~~,eoo Sf. F ~ au~6~~g Iniom,aGen. . (in sq n } ~ a~rQ~r. 5; r~. ► s Fla~ ' ~ ' ~aYc1~ 3•r~1-2doo Waee-pa::ed-o.~} ~7Ya~7N ~ V~rN ~F~ f ~ r i . ~ - ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ Ci.,C - . . - - - ~ Associatps lnc. +~IH1M,E}`ii.Y ~mmawam+~r.u_. _ ea ~ May 8, 2000 '07 west 7th suite 200 W.O. No. S000179 ;pokaner WA 99204 r08-458-6844 09-458-6W Fax Jim Faik pokane, wa - memW, co ~ Spokane County Engineering ; 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 , ; RE: Trip Distribution Letter for the Eden Rezone Property Dear Mr. Falk: , Per the 1999 Road Standards of Spokane County, we have prepared a trip distribution letter for the Eden property, locaited northeast of the oomer of Sullivan and Valleyway. This report will follow the draft standards for doing traffic distribution letters as put forward by Spokane County Engineering. Project Description The parcels proposed for this rezone are located east af a pawer sub-station ~ which lies on the northeast corner of Sullivan / Valleyway. The Car Toys site lies in the northwest camer adjacent to the site. The site has no direct access to , Sullivan, but a cross-access through the Car Toys site would allow access to Sullivan. At the present time, the 1.72 acre site is in two parcels and is in use for two ; singte family homes, one on each parcel. The site is presently zoned UR-3.5 (Urban Residential - 3.5 units per acre). A blanket rezone (rezone without a site plan) is requested from the exisfing UR ~ 3.5 zone to the B-2 (Community Business) zone. No proposed uses have been identified for the site. Therefore, this traffic disbibution letter is based upon "highest and best use" of the property under the proposed zoning. VicinttY / Site Plan A vicinity map is included as Figure 1 and a plan of the existing property is included as Figure 2. This proposal is for a blanket rezone, and no specific site plan has been developed for the property. ; ~ ~ TriQ Generation Due to the unidentified commercial nature of this proposed rezone, Land Use ~ Category 820, Shopping Center was chosen from the Trip Generation Manual, , 6th Edition publlshed by the Institute of Transportation Enaineerinq for the site. j- ' Shopping Center covers a wide variety of retail establishments. For trip ~annlng generating purposes, it was assumed that the 1.72 acre site could accommodate `m9lneerin9 ~ 18.740 square feet of retail space. This is approximately 1/4 of the total parcel Ard,iiteclure E square footage. The resulting trip generation rates are shown on Table 1. ,andscRe Architecture .and Surveyingr ~ormeriy IPE ` . . • ~ Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May 8, 2000 0 Page 2 Tab/e 1- Trip Generation Rates and Volumes for Shoppjng Center on Eden PropertY . , AM PQak Hour PM Peak Hour KSF Vol @ 1.03 Directionai Vol @ Directional trips per Dlstribution 3.74 trips Distribution KSF 61 % In 39% Out Pec KSF ,ag% In 52°fo Out 18.74 , 19 12 7 70 34 , 36 Average Daily Ln:p Ends (AD'T) KSF Rate Total aDT ~ 18.74 42.92 804 , The traffic to and from this site woutd likety be made up of new (destination) traffic, pass- by/diverted traffic and possibiy shared traffic. Sinoe a site plan has not been developed, shared trips will not be considered. Pass-by/diverted trips will be from Sullivan Road only. To quantify pass by trips, the Trip Generation Handbook published by the Institute of Transportation Enaineers was consulted. No information is available for the AM peak hour. Therefore, it was assumed that all AM peak hour trips are new (destination) trips. Very little pass-by information is avaitabte for shopping centers of this size, but the PM peak hour rates are summarized on Table 2 from Table 5.4 in the Trip Generation Handbook for the smallest shopping centers which provided pass-by information. Table 2- Pass-by Informatfon for PM Peak Hour for Shopping Center Located on Eden property Size (ksf) Primary trip Non-Pass-by Diverted Pass-by Trip °!o Tti°/~ Litlked Tri °lo 9 - 41 - 59 45 24 - 20 56 17 - 34 - ss 44 - 49 - 51 Average 24 41.3 , 20 , 58 , P . ~ . . • c Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May 8, 2000 - Page 3 Based upon the infoRnation in the Trip Generation Nandbook, if a commercial use was located at this site, approximately 58% of the traffic would be pass-by traffic. A summary of trip generation characteristics of the Eden property with the pass-by information included is shown on Table 3. Table 3- PM Peak Noui Trip Types and Volumes for the Retatl on the Eden Property KSF PM Peak Djrectional Dishibution Hour Votume , Entering Exittng 18.74 70 34 36 New 30 14 16 Pass-by 40 20 ZO If the site was to more fully develop into housing under the exisong UR-3.5 zoning, it woufd likety develop into 6 single family residences which would generate 5 AM peak hour trips, 6 PM peak hour trips and 70 ADT trips. Therefore, the rezoning of the property will generate a net increase in Uaffic to the suROUnding transportation system of 14 AM peak hour trips, 24 PM peak hour trips (not counting pass-by traffic) and 734 ADT trips. Trip Distrfbution Traffic distribution during the PM peak hour for the new (desfination) trips is expec#ed to be 10% to/from Valleyway west of the site, 10% to/from Valleyway east of the site, 20% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 60% on Sullivan to/from south of the sne. Traffic disVibuflon during the PM peak hour for the pass-by/diverted trips is expected to be 70% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 30% on Sullivan tolfrom south of the site. Therefore the total trip distribution for this site is 5% to/from Valleyway west of the site. 5% to/from Valleyway east of the site. 50% on Sullivan to/from north of the site and 40% on Sullivan to/from south of the site. Access to the site was assumed to be by using a short section of Valleyway, from Sullivan to the site, east of Sullivan. Conclusions and Recommendations It is not anticipated that this project would have any noticeable impacts to the surrounding transportation system. No more than 18 vehicles will be added to any single segment of Sullivan and that is to the south of the site. New traffic to the north is expected to be 6 vehicles, with origins mostty within the suROUnding neighborhood, south of I-90 and possi6ly firom the residential areas along Sullivan north of I-90 and north of Trent. ~ , • • • • r . Trip Distribution Letter for Eden Rezone Property May :8, 2000, Pa!e _4 - - If youu have any,questions,rega(ding this letter,, please let me know and I,will be happy to address them. Sincerefy, CL-C Assoaates, Inc. . ~ , . . . . Ann L. Winkler, tP:`E: ALW/alw enci. - Vicinity, Map - Plan,of Existing S'rt'e , cc: ('via Jim Falk) t " Neen; i'roject Sponsor file. 'J^ V/ • ~ Z • • " .::ullivan Park . E INDIANA t ~ , North o ~ W - ~ MI' A. . - , _ _ - - ~t 8/0~ Z w w - ~ E ~INT OC ~ ~ DNE ij BSHA T Z ~ m ~M ~ cn TAl DO AL O m o ~ o L~ZlII1 Bi-a»ch (..~'alial • , co E L~ON CO ~ E v ' E BROADWAY E E gFRINGFIELb E SPRINGF ELD ' z z ~n E AL~ z - E OLIVE D~ ~ ALKI RD ~ r V LLEYWAY ~ Z ~Y t _ @ ~ ~ 00 EVALLEY V~ AY ~ p E 4 f, w E NIXON o Z ~ o > ~ E MA N ~ z ~ E MAIN . E MAIN x ~ m g~- W Z W Proj,~ct Locaticm ; Z E RIVER 31pE ~ Z E RIVERSIpE E~PRAGUE ~ E SPRAG 1E _ ASF ~ ~ er-a~d-a~l e-~ Z ~ - zST A era ~ N ~ E 2ND ~ 0o E 3RD ~ cn cn 'G) 3R~-- O w tTH W E 4TH 1 m U) lE4TH iTH 0 m 5TM D u E 5 H Lt~lc D ~ ~ L i ~ 0 ~ E 6TH x ~ ~ E~H < q 6TH L v ip D P\Jsjlellc, l r Luk 'TH ~ ;u E 7TH o ~ 51`~ cn ~m Z r- W o ~ E 8TH ao ~ E~TH ~ Vicinity~ap ; 9TH co z o 9T1- ~ v) m w - ~ X E 11 TH Q MI-SCHOOL ' 11 TH ~ 0 ~ p = tn w ~ ; t~ m E 12TH ~ co w co rn v 13T o rn~ m . . ~ 14T tn i,E 13TIH MC.2 ~ N E 14TW ~ 0 0 -Fr- 15T pD ~ ~ 15T~m cn co 16TH ~ ~ ~ z in ~ E 16TH ~ , `~vkSS- ~ u,LG i ~ Lf 3 4 6 ZEs09_O0 ~ V'1C7in►ty Map ~ { n. - ~ ~'~r~~`~U n-~✓ ~ I;Al ~Is' ~~riz•t1w `n ~'~~•.t~~ ^~T , f--in•1~r~~~►1 "'et:.~i~' -12 ! i} 11.a~l~J~b.~tJ.44~w1.i11 lt It{ 11^~1 11 V, )Ilir ~ ' ~rto ~ttti 4h► a~~~ 07 ~~~~t~~~s~ ,po,~ ; ~ .,.,r ~ L 18 - . ~ R _ 13 iL~ o AW t, cc ~ v ~ " ~r N ~ t q Pet 3e V IL p ~ ~ ~fll~l i ~ e t t e ~ ~ 24 1 ~ 1 ~ r111 19 Pr~ ~ = r ~ r ~ ~ 25 130 + 4 ~ ~ %+liciruty MaP ti inch ~ 1667 ft 03t3~ Sc,a Parcei; 45133 0540 Owner: WHELOON, D W& K Coawner. Owner Address 15523 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE WA 99037-9525 USA M ' Site Address `15523 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE ~ BroacKvay ; Legal DescripUon VERA S2215FT OF Et 18FT OF S112 OF W112 OF 8LK 21 EXC PT N f . - LYG E OF A LN DRN FROM A PT 10 8FT W OF NE CAR OF W112 OF v 8LI( 21 TO A PT15FT W OF SE COR OF SD W112 - 7~ ~ ; 4~ ~ - _ ~ ~ F ~ ' ~ ~ Notlce: This is not a Iegal dacumenf, Data depfcted on this map is general & subJect to constant reviston. It Is intended ia referenoe use on{y. Legal dowments should be obbined hm Ihe appropdate agency. ~ I ~ y I 3 ~ ~ ~ ' j ' . ' • ~ _ ~ ~ . - ~ p - i I ' ~ e"'~ ; j~ l_` ~ ~6~~ ~ .t,. 1 ~ . , . ~ ~Sr . ~ ,d : ~ : cav- ~,~s-v~sr''$' _ . ~ ~ - - ' - - - _ ~ !3 s 7i~.~•~ „ - ~ ~ ~ ' , i _ ` , ~ ~ - . i a y► •er r ~ - j M1 ~ , ~ : ~..!lL~3' ~ ~ - s a s d _ ~ . 6~ ~ ~ ~ A ~9 t ~ ; - 2~ , 7 : ~ too~+ ~ ~ y N ` ♦ _ • 7 r • 1' - ' _ , ~ r ~ ~ p ~ W ~ ~ ~ . - 1 , ' n s ~ - ~ ~ I ~ ~ t ~ , ~ ~ _ . 1 1l ~ • _ ; ` Z~~ , Z 2 ~ . ~ Z4 t 6 ~ ~ g $ . ~ g lt..r " " ~ ~1 . `'6`-'I^ ~ jj ~ _ ' _ y~ - . - ~ .~..~~Y , _ „ ~~o S ~ - + ~ il/O. /io rll~. ~Ew d~~ V Y Y a ~ 's ~ s s '~6 . q ~ ~ O ~ a r F,1 M i • • Z8 2T z6 Z5 ~ 3 - e . O 0 ► + ~ ~l M M ~ ~ tl Y . - ~ ~ .I _ ~d _ _ _ - -=vrt__ s~'~~s a~a~e-~ _'`a- q _ • d n I .r VA4 ~NOT N~j ~ _ - - _ S ~ a'~` I a ~ - a ~ ~ ~ . ° - , 29 30 ' ~9t 32~' ~r,g •e .t4 ~00 ~ re° ~ ! ~A.* O ~ ~ _ . 0 O ~ G S ~;t s t~ ~ ~O;' ~ ~ ~ No. 2 S I 2 s. t a s•.. ~i ~ ~ ~de► v ra.a w~►1rS sv ~ - . Parc.el: 48133.0524 Owner: EDEN ETAL, V L CoOwner: Owner Address 10408 S MADISON RD VALLEYFORD WA 99036-9756 USA Site Address 15525 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE ~BrpaCkaY , Legal Description VERA PT 821 S tl2 OF W215 OF E112 8 S1 f2 OF BEG NE CO R OF f W112 TH W ALG NL 10 8FT TH S TO 9116FT W OF SE COR OF W1l2 ~ n TH Et SFT TH N TO POB< ~ N 7 ~ ~ - - - ~ _ , , ~AE ~ Notice; This ls not a(egal document. Data depicted on thls map is general 8 subJeQt to constanl revision. It fs intended far referenoe use anly. Legal documents shauld be obtained from the appropriate agency. J T 1 SEC.13, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W. M. swsI: I• ~ 4od ~ i p,a, ~vaaaae ~ns~N Q ~ 1 VC,~ , 7 f e12 7 33 • ~ ' B ~v~s~mv . ~ , ~ ~ ` r ' ' R uM11'w PU"A 24" $q COstia AOQtYYON TO 3S 6REtY14 CRES ~ Ac~0 1 ~ / . 87 a . , ~ +K.. . rv. _ • r ~!'4!!~►~~',~, ` ~ t > _ l °i ~ t ~"y ` • tq' ~`j'! " - ~ fK ir ~'y Nf ~1 ~ .,i A ,4~ J ~ r ti .a• 4hF - ~ ; : ~ Y / ~ ~ ~ `~T~.~~ ~ ~ S/A i~ ~ ~ ~ / 1• 1 r ~a. V I~/ + • ~ ~ ' 4 '4`N9 r ~ ~ O , . ~ ' ! i 86 • ~ • .r .,a - ~ 4 . . s ~o 1e ; 1s ~ _ . g 7' y ~ , . • ~ " r • ~ ~ 31 a~ ' ~ • ~4 s ~ ro ~ ~ ~ 7 8 ♦ ` • ~ . s ,.,...r ~ ' ' , . • • ~i~ , • . v ~ a, LS 87 E6 28 ~ ~ • 40 9 4 ~ • •w • ~ (L _ . ass ~.er ~ p ~ ~ ~ Y MAfM • , ~ ~ • I t ~ s ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~i w 89 30 31 : IL 18 Iri • ~ ~ & ►~w.v. No. 8312 ~g. r o b 1 - r GouwTt R o^o N0.251 a ~ a - es` ~ - - ~ ~4' cRP~a~b- Z e r ~ • ~34C p • ~ S 1t ?4 R . w 4c>A rE ~ aescaiari oAr 1 s, K ~ s~P ~vYtASe. w 6-/Q~`7t 1 srvi~ ~~sJOw~ AEAaeauesi0 AROAI 400"wr Akw 1 ~ : . ~ , e .a ~ P!lt~P'~~~ n~ , • , -rC)lCANE r o-lI#I1Y A SrS'ESSQR • ~ ~ i s w~r.. ,~r - ~ ~ _ o._ • _ - I. dw ~ J ~ . • ~ T . i~L 0 IM5 ~ I 1 I ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ ! I - , 4- ~ 5 de ~ ~0 ~ ~7 O ~ ~ C ' ~ 1 1. ~ • ~ ' . • ' '~w O ' I . - ~ t 7 " p ~ ~ I.l • ~j!q . , ~ A ~o too •ns ' Fo C/g ~ IA I ~ 115 e ' , ' ~ a-~:~= ~ ~ ~ p ~ j t ~ ~ ~a• , . s5-t ~y 2?~ L e ~ - r ~r.~ rt,a 1 . 3 _-m ~ k i k s E a gg f ~ E 4 i 3 s 4 i. gi