The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-031-96 . # S P O K A N E O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER MICHAEL C. DEMPSEY, CHIEF EXAMINER September 19, 1996 A. R. Mirghanbari South 2925 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99223 RE: Letter of Approval for ZE-31-96; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-22 (IJR-22) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional Business (B-3) Dear Mr. Mirghanbari: Please be advised that after visiting the site again after the public hearing held in the above matter, I have decided to approve your application for a rezone of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pines Road and Valleyway. I will, however, add two additional conditions to the approval as stated below. In accordance with Section 14.810.020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code, the proposal shall be conditioned to prohibit any sight obstruction that constitutes a hazard to the traveling public, as determined by the County Division of Engineering, within the "clear view triangle" applicable to corner lots. This includes elimination of parking space(s) in the northwest corner of the property that creates a sight obstruction within the "clear view triangle", as determined by County Engineering. Mr. Engelhard of County Engineering will be requested to review the site plan again to make this deternvnation. The proposal will also be conditioned to prohibit any testing, along Valleyway, of motor vehicles that are being offered for sale, repaired, detailed or serviced on the site. Valleyway east of the site is a very narrow arterial, bordered by single-family homes in a residential setting. This approval is subject to the entry of formal written findings, conclusions and decision consistent with this letter. Very truly ours, c Michael C. Dempsey Spokane County Hearing Examiner cc Louis Webster, Division of Building and Planning Scott Englehard, Division of Engineering WSDOT, 2714 North Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207 2090 Dwight Hume, South 107 Howard, Suite 325, Spokane, WA 99204 Robert Anzivino, 15922 East 23rd Court, Veradale, WA 99037 Jim Make, 11905 East 25 Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 Bill Sleeth, South 9 Washington, Suite 701, Spokane, WA 99204 Jess Richardson, 12508 East Valleyway, Spokane, WA 99216 THIRD FLOOR PUI3LIC WORKS BUILDING 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WnsHwcTOtv 99260-0245 PHO!ve: (509) 324-3490 • Fnx (509) 324-3478 • TDD: (509) 324-3166 r ~ ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET AS BU1LT PLANS RECEIVED REZONE FILE # ZE-031-96 -96 Related File # ) AARD # ( DRZE-202-96 ) Date to Review 09/18/1996 # l Date to AA & DR 07/ 18/ 1996 Time 1:15 Date Received 06/27/ 1996 Large Lots Project Name B-1 & UR-22 TO B-3 GLOBE MOTORS REP No. Lots o No. Acres .94 Range - Townstup - Section 45153.2803 SITE ADDRESS E PINES N 324/S VALLEYWAY/N MAIN PARCEL Applicant's Name DWIGHT HUME Phone # 456-7402 Address GLOBE MOTORS Phone 2# 107 S HOWARD STE 325 SPOKANE WA 99204 FLOOD ZONE No W S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed - Billing Name Owner A R MIRGHANBARI Engineer ERNEST M WARNER Address Address 2925 S VERNON Company J U B ENGINEERING INC SPOKANE WA 99223 Address 1250 IRONWOOD DR STE 220 Signed Phone 535-6152 City COEUR D'ALENE,ID 83$14 Phone Phone/FAX (208)667-1574 FAX p Date Building Contact Person: STEVE DAVENPORT Phone # 456-3675 Date Submitted Description Initials DATE FEES RECEIVED UATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN NOTICE TO PUBLIC /t 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS 09/ 18/ 1996 HEaRING EXAM APPROVED )EMED 'PEALED BCC APPEALED PROJECT APPROVED -ENIED STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE) STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) I • I ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET AS BUILT PLANS RECEIVED REZONE FILE # ZE- - Related File # ( ) AARD # { DRZE-202-96 ) Date to Review # Date to AA & DR 07/ 18/ 1996 Time 1:15 Date Received 06/27/ I996 Project Name B-1 & UR-22 TO B-3 GLOBE MOTORS /REP No. Lots No. Acres .94 Range - Township - Section 45153.2803 SITE ADDRESS E PINES N 324/S VALLEYWAY/N MAIN PARCEL Applicant's Name DWIGHT HUME Phone # 456-7402 Address (GLOBE MOTORS) Phone 2# 107 S HOWARD STE 325 SPOKANE WA 99204 FLOOD ZONE No W S Schaol 356 Date Conditions Mailed Billing Name Owner A R MIRGHANBARI Engineer ERNEST M WARNER Address Address 2925 S VERNON Company J U B ENGINEERING INC SPOKANE WA 99223 Address 1250 IRONWOOD DR STE 220 City COEUR D' ALENE, ID 83814 Signed Phone Phone 535-6152 Phone/FAX (208)667-1574 FAX Date Building Contact Person: STEVE DAVENPORT Phone # 456-3675 Date Submitted Descripiion Initials - - DATE FEES RECEIVED DATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED I l DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS l l HEARING EXAM APPROVED )ENIED 'PEALED BCC APPEALED PROJECT APPROVED ENIED STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE) / / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) r . i~ Date: 07/31/96 To: Steve Davenport From: Scott Engelhard J ~ RE: Globe Motors Rezone Application We have accepted the trip distribution analysis submitted by the applicant and will allow them to proceed to a public hearing. I ; -1 - . . ti - _ . 07/31/96 Confidential 1 - .~J ~ RECEtVED INLAND ('ACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. sPOKANE GouNTY mn 2 6 1996 July 23, 1996 OIVISfON OF BUILDINO AND pLANNING W.O. No. 96157 BY; ~ WAS' Scott Englehart ' Spokane County Engineers W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ~4~ ~ 31398 ~ RE: Globe Motors Rezone Traffic Distribution ~NAI- EXPIRES 5/1 Dear Scott, I have been contacted by Dwight Hume, a representative for Globe Motors, to perform a brief trip distribution for the potential Globe Motors site at Pines & Valleyway. As I understand the project, the proposed Globe Motors site involves two existing parcels, one zoned B-1 and the other zoned UR-22. The B-1 site was previously used for an auto repair shop/tire store, and this building will be used by Globe Motors for their operations on this site. The UR-22 site is presently vacant, but for purposes of this trip distribution analysis, it will be analyzed at it's most intense use under the UR-22 zoning criteria. Based upon the site's location and size, it appears that its most intense use is something under the "business and professional office" heading in the zoning code, which was assumed to be a bank with a drive-in window. A bank with these characteristics could easily locate on a 18,000 square foot site, the size of this parcel. Trip generation characteristics of a Drive-in Bank as outlined in the Trip Generation Manual, Sth Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers were used for this analysis. , Trip generation characteristics of the B-1 site, the tire and auto repair site, were obtained from the previous owner and are also found in the SEPA checklist. Based upon the previous owner's experience, about eight trips generated by employees will enter this site in the AM peak hour, about 20-25 trips will occur during the day, but at off peak hours, and eight trips, again generated by the employees, will exit the site in the PM peak hour. Potential trip generation characteristics of the bank which could locate on the UR-22 site, and the trip generation characteristics of the B-1 site are shown on Table 1 which follows. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Cceur d'Alene, ID 83814 . 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 9 FAX: 208-769-7277 . ~ l,. w IIV~~ - r , ~ O y ~ Y Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter July 23, 1996 ~ 2 31398 Page 2 ~~ssl~7st~~ Gt ONAL , . Table 1- Trip Generation - Potential under Existing Zoning EXPIRES 5/1/Qj ~ Land Use ~ PM Peak Hour KSF Vol. @ 43.63 trips per Directional Distribution KSF 48% In 52% Out Bank 4 175 84 91 New Trips 88 42 46 Pass-by 87 42 45 Trips Vol. Based on Field Trips In Trips Out Cond. Tire/ Repair Store 1.9 8 0 8 <.>:;:;:.:.::<.»;:.::.: :;>:>~~9 ::.:;.:<:<::::.::.:... ~ ~ . ~ . . . . . . . _ ._..._....;l;:::~.:....... _ . . . ~ Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) Land Use KSF Rate Total ADT ~ ~ . : : Bank 4 265.21 1,061 Tire/repair shop 1.9 * 56-66 , : ' : . . :::::>::;::::;:::>:<><~: ~ . . ~ ~ : . KSF - Thousand Square Feet * Rate based on field conditions The trips going to and from the bank will be partly pass-by trips, since some of the patrons of the bank will already use Pines Road on their way to and from work. As Table 1 show, this is estimated to be 50% of the trips to and from the bank. Therefore, for the existing zoning and potential land uses, this site could generate 183 trips, 96 of which would be trips on the transportation system specifically to use the services at this location. Under the proposed rezone and site plan, the trip generation characteristics of the site, based upon Globe Motors other two locations in Spokane, are shown in Table 2. The information in Table 2 was derived from the SEPA checklist, and includes some customer trips in with the employee trips. Globe Motors does not operate their repair facilities on a first come first serve basis. Repair work done at a Globe Motors facility is scheduled ahead of time and the customers w j]ytC z ~°F WAS h 0 Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter . July 23, 1996 Page 3 _ ,Q 3 ] 3981 Fs ~'ts~ Gti AL til1 )EXpIRES 5/ t / ~ 1 1 using Globe Motors come to the site for their appointments. These appointments are scheduled throughout the day, but not during the peak hours. A second item to note with regards to trip generation characteristics particular to Globe Motors, is that the car lot generates about four or five customers per day. The big trip generation day for the car lot is Saturday. Therefore, the uses within Globe Motors do not generate much peak hour traffic. The majority of their traffic occurs either on the weekends, or during the middle of the weekday. Table Z- Trip Generation - Potential under Proposed Zoning witli Proposed Uses AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour KSF - Traffic Directional Traffic Directional Volumes ' Distribution Valumes Distribution I Trips In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out 1.9 8 6 1 6 4 2 Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) , _ . : KSF Rate Total ADT . 1.9 * 60 _ rate based on field conditions Under the proposed zoning and uses for the site, about 7 trips in the PM peak hour could be expected to be generated. This is a reduction of 89 trips from the potential uses of the two parcels under existing zoning. Under the existing zoning, about 60% (50 trips) of the trips generated to this site in the PM peak hour could be expected to come from the north, with the majority of them passing through the Pines/I-90 interchange. The uses proposed by Globe Motors are point destination uses, as allowed under the B-3 Regional Business zoning category. Therefore, many of these trips will also use the Pines/I-90 interchange. However, even if as many as 80% of the trips to and from this site use the Pines/I- 90 interchange, this would total 6 trips in the AM peak hour and 5 trips in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, this is a reduction of 45 trips below what could be generated by this site under the existing zoning. r Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter ' July 23, 1996 Page 4 . Therefore, based upon the trip generation and trip distribution characteristics of the existing site versus the proposed uses and site plan of this proposal, the rezoning the site serves to lessen the impacts to the transportation system from this site. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. If you need any additional information on this issue, please let me know. Sincerely, . . Ann L. Winkler, P.E. AL W/alw cc: John Pederson, Spokane County Planning Dwight Hume ti• VJINkL 0 p~ R 31398~ ~ ~css jO~sr~~~C~ g 5J11 ~ ~ EXPIRE ~ ~ , . . . „ . - ~ y • ` _ ~ ' 1 - ~ - . , ~ ~`~56 ~ - ~ _ - ~ j~ ~ ~r: . ar~ ~ - : ' i $ ~1 - ~ o ~ a ~ a ~ tiaT d~. a~...• ~ O Ddf►~~~ L ' ! T ~ ~ , w•s~'~"~' " ~ f ~ 5►~~ . •i , ,Jr ~ re7 A~~ ~ T ~ i 1 • r,~'~.,~ ~ f ~~pp~~; . et ~ ' pt,3 _ _ ~ 4 G ~,T A, ~ _ ~ p~~,,1 E ~ p,T ~'L T , _ ~ ~sr Q~.S > ~,s,os~+ a' • ; Y ~ ~ ~ t ~ n~~ ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • t+. o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . $ Cl 7' _ " , '6y s m ~ ' ' R I , w 1 ~ ~ as ~ A +-~l 1 ; 1., • 9 . 'i . • • ~'t ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i . , - . ' • : ~ " ~ 1~ ~ ~d ~ ~ f ~ /K~~~ •1 ~ ' ~ K~ ! y ~b . • - g . ~ ' ~itt~~~°~v~~' ~ V e'` ~ ~ S~f A~D/ t~ ` ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~+L" ~ _ ' • I p~, ~ ~ i t, , ,a~w' • : ~ ~ ' . ~ .s~ 4 ; . • , ~ : ± . '~s ' ~ ~ e"• ~ ~ ` i ~ ~''r ° _ M . . ~ 0 , Q . • ' D~.~~04 D'"' ~ 1 , • ~,~e~ ~ z o ~ - - q ~~d~ - , ~ d ~ ~ _ . P/~p'~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ 1~ ' ~ ~ ~ Y' I . ~ . ~ ~'~'l~u~ . t . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - ' • - - 3 ~ ~L' , ' ~ ~F1C~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ i99~ ~ : , ~ . PG j ~ 1,,. _ , . • - ~ ~ ~ _ , . ~ 1 ~ ♦ ~ • ~ q~ ~ • ~ • ~'j ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7H l~'~I ~ ~ a ,t..~ e t ac - 4~ t ~ ;.0.. . . ~ ~ ~Y--- t + • .i q ~ (f " ! ° i ' , e S ~ . ~ ♦ + ~ 7 ~ ~ ; ~up: ~H . ~ pw/E.~ t Z x ~ r d T ~v B►'J ~ ~ ~ yc A' v - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ •~1~ ~ v E ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ , ~ • ~ o ~ g " ~ p,~+e 2 ~ ' ' . ~ ~''0 ?N ~'V'-r ~ - ~ - - ~ ~~r r _ _ ~i _ ' _ ~ . ,....--Zt , . _ ~ ' ~ q~ _ . _ , a ~ . . _ - - 'pa~~ ~ . - ~ foT ~'3 ~ "96 n loE, I3E S~ R'ep°rc - -a • 1000 , a ~ ba A!~ ' ~ `d IP64 _r - ~ ~ \ ~ ~ R ti ~ ~ p t o ° ~i, p~ ~ , • - + . ~ ~,...s'"~, , ' $ r ' , , ~ d+ ~ a + i ' ~ j~ ~ o [ ~ o t • b b r . ~ , t . e , ' •i • c ~ e ~ ~~J ' I ~ l' y, ~ ~ 7~ r 1~ 4' 7 r + f ~ p f0 d ~ rt t~r 010 f 4 ~ y , ~ 1 = • 0~ 5 1 ~ 4 01R ~ ' r , 1 ~ 0• oe O !~e ~ e y O , { ~ ~ r . , • , ~ ~ «~~~1 ae ~rro ~ • rp~~, ` ix I } f/ ~ I ~ ~ ~ u~r~t~►-•ser I,Ff ~ ~ ~ ~ , i1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ' ' , + . ~ r t , ~ ' ` ~ •a ' A,+~ I ~ f A 0 9b r ~ ~ ' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ + rA ~0 f ~ ~ ~ ~ O~' ~ 1 / ~ 'r ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ . ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ t ~ t yb~'. • 4 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1ilJ 1 I i ~ ( • ~ ' 0~ ~0 ~ ! ~ ~ y • ~ ~ ' ~tIq1 1 ~ -es P B ~ ~1 ~t, r D ~ ~ • 1 ; I; 0 r 0~1 N " ~ ~6~[a,~'`rr'0~' 7 t Vl ~~nApq • N ~ i1 (V t11 r. ~ ~~r ~~1 J , w ~r I ` ' i f ia, ~ y i . • ~i ~ r~ . ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ I + ~ • , , • • ' , ~ ' ~ 1' l,~ • g ~ ~ . • ~h- 0 ~ ' q' ~0 ~ee ♦ .a ~9 '~i ~ ` D .i ~ ~`'t~~ 1 ''r~• 'ro ~ a ~ a' ~ o _ R ~ r, ' ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ • I t t - I, y~ ~1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ Q~..•~'' ~ y ~ ~ 1 ~ ` ~ ~,f~ ~ 4I ~ ~ ' • ~ a ~ t ' ~ . ~.4 ~ ~ ~e ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ' ~ p ~ ~ 9 ~ ari t ~ ~r ~ i , e ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1},.r~ ~ s 4, : i , 1 ~ ,1„~• ♦ ~tM~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 , ~ J ~ , f ' ~L ~ ~ O ~ . ~ ~ 7 ~jt'~ . ` ~ , : ~ 1 ~ ; ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ , -d 1 ~ ~ 1 e i • ~ F~+ F~ `1 p ~ ~ Z \ ti 1i s. ~ t~.1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ i • ~ ~ d ~ 0 ~ ~R1 ~ . , ► , . . „ , ~ ' ~ i d~~ ~ ~,~a ` , ~ ~ r 1 • ' 't is ° • •1f ~ ' ~ v r* ~ N mi , ~ 11•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~IQMQB ~ ' j ~Q~ ~ b p 1 S ~p$ 'a~'r" d ~ ~ '1 ,N.~I• ~s'~ ~ N ' o'r e ~ r I' ~ N ~ : , ~ ' ~ } ~ y~ • y' ~ ~T~~~ ~ $r ~4 oi~,~~~ ~ + ~ . ~ l ( f/~ to T') i r y ~ i:• . f ~ .1 ~p ~ n 'g °p ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~s y"' ~ .o ~ - o ) I~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~fd ~ e~~ ~ p r ~ 1 ~ 1 ',4 ~ ~ ~ - - ~ p N ~ ~ ~Ii~p ~ ` i t I~~~ h d ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ 4~, , ' M 1 1. l ~ • S • ~ 1 ( ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ „ ~ ~ W - ~ `r~• ' ~ ~ ~ p~p. 1 ~ a~ O ~ L t , ~ F ~ h~ Iti ' ~ V, ~ ~ ~ 2; ~"'~0 brbd N ~ ~ t _ ~ b~ ^ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ' ~ l1 ~ ~ ~r~f { ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ i, •h ~ 'v y~ rI ♦W 1g~`1, 1 , I ~ - ' e ~i~ A e ~ ~ ~ • '71r ~ , • ' pI~ ~r~~ N t$ _ 6 . RN~`t ~ ~ TE ~ •o ~ ' KAE41 n SP~. , t" • n - ~ ~ ' •~l~~ ~ • I ' ~J ~ 1~ ~ a ~ ~~~'ON r _ ~ - TNERA . ~ ~ ~s=^"" ' ' . ~ . , • . r. . , ~ ~,..e~j • e • . l w 1 ~ ~ ' ' 1~ ~ ' ' t~Q ' a il _ • . t ~ ~ kk7) ~ • ' 4` y ~ • ~^-earg-~A • • ~ ~ ~ • ' igow A 69 G~ • • " • SOoka e ' ° ~d000 , tl ' OtA ~ Park @ ~M►~~` -J . ~ t1o~ g (~JI~f _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Par, ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ..s--, ~i y 4 B~ AV~ A ~ ~y w a ~rJE J ` tJ~ • ..s • CP f ~ ~ •►Y ~ ,?~?S? ~ ~ Jc40 ► ' 16 A . ~ 6 ~uk Tr~+ ss} 1{ va<<~" ~ ~ O~p~~'~ ~ ~ ~~t~ ~ ~ " • • ~ , q a •o~~• i ~ •e ~ r ~ s - ~ 'r } 1 spA4 U~` fti . ~ ~ NJ t ~ ' ~ ' • + ~Al 11 C H a ~ a $t~ Q{` q ~ ,r~=~~., • • ~ ^'~~Q 6 ~ , SS - ~ ~ } ~ ~ y' ~ ' ~ Q~sj'~ tt T ~ p► .Q~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ •9 ~ • 1 ` , ~ ~y dgel+ ~ -r ' ~ " " • ♦ . :ei~? `a • iq3 • • ~ ' y • v ~ 't ,t f ' ~ r . - s O . ~ : A ~ ~ • ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ •e ~ ~s ` i~,, { 1 ~ ~ ' ~ to~'"~a, ~,"C~''~9r~ ` 2Q , ..a• '1 ' - ' . : ~ . MW "Wg,ac,O.tb ..*.a * q ~ ~ _ _ . ~ 6 . , , • , 20 ~ ~--~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~'~'~i ~O 9C1 ?a ♦~rltlE~ • e ~ • '~r ~ . y - ~ - - ~T:.~ ~ • e 1 a ~ _ _ ~ , 1 ~ ` t ~ o , w ;1 10 ~41D°~ ~ ~ ; 4 We~~ • ~1~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ; • ~ _ u ^ _ ~r 10 r ^``~0--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •f y p ~ j f t 4 ° ~ 11 T t ~ OtOr ~ 1r'$0 ~ 7 G _ ~ ~ ~ w ` 1~ a•,a, I ~ f~+" ` ` . ' ~ • ~ t ~`,tJ'r ~ - t '~EKa" 'tiie~ 24 1 • ~ 1~ ..~4r- • ;y„ ~ . ~ pa!..k . r A i ~1 t~ t_ p~~•~ ~ , ~ _ , " c - ; 0-0 ~ r ~ i J i..,~ • _ ~ , ~1 k 1`~ - ~ - l~ . . ~ - 't i.- ~ ~g-20,cC kll-o 2003• ~ } "~e.. r xo'3± 21 ,i ---•,1 ' ~ ~ `t " _ , ~ ~ ~ ► ~ 3 a 31-96 for 911~96 IAB Stdf ~9 6 , a v . - - - , ti, . 1B- 4 missrom ~ i, . . ~a . . ~ rc" r ` ~ ~ d~~!'E. ~ UR°3. 5 ` ~~-2- 2 . , I 5,wro UR UR°22 ! o ~ L!R°3.~I : g i 89l 118,~N F. ~ A~9~+... j ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ E -T 0 ~ OVE ~ ' ~ ~g ~ > ~TA L CA?ss►LDU ~ - - - - - a' g~, ~msl.s~r c'~: ' , UR•~~ • ~ ~ , : , A - 8-3 "UR°cir,' ~ r R°22 _ ~2 > A• I ~.~1!'~la ~~4~.ri ♦l~.t - ~ 1~• _ ~ - ~ ~ °S s ' . y Q~r4. ~ ~ p UR-22~ ~ 1 . t ~ ~nes ~ ~D ~o ~ _ w • a~Ki . fl .r . . ~ad . _ • ~ y ~ v ~~-22 0, 22 . e~t.v8 .atr a UR°22, o AL L Y WA1/ ALL Ey UR-7 ! f + UY T -2f . o e ~ a Ek. : hpzi ! tI'i1'~ ~1~ Z v ` • ~ PGST ¢F! CE' ~ ~+Q u : d A i . - ~ - - - . ~ _ _ _ - - . -,r- - _ - ' ~~J~- `EH UR-22 y ~ 12Z r r . j OURTH A\!' 44TM Ad'E ~ or~.,,~,. ; ~ st ~ ~ ~9S o ~ . 6Ti-4 7 ~~X VE ~1N~~ ~ _ •~i.-= - . ~ ~ ~ 7 Tm 4VE ~ D 4R" ' S U15 ; _=SGjHTH AvE EL. 20I4 8 TH AVE 22 ~ ~ ooV~~~ ~ AVE f y , y~ S~9 t ` • . ' ~ . . 9 ~ C nYf.l ~ . .~__~w - f'1 9118/96 HE Staff' Report for ZE-3I-96 Page 4 . • _ . . ~ , - . _ ~ _ t I 6 d 0 T ~.1 0 I 0 r t~ f~ w• ,RE ZONE ~ _r. ~ ~ 1 ~ r I ~ LINiNL I IOMINO . FROM d~~ + IJR Lz ~ i TO ~•ti - _ ~ b~ ~ cd ~enro wa+ ,w wr,a • w.-~r ~v ~ ' r VhLLAY WRY , - Ndaropo UO~o~ a,e nwa ~ ana*a on+N /aare ' Mro ~ewi 7 40 !/e n 00".01.0 nw 0 r1e mr 1 I0+'a'ri Ma~ Uv' ' fI Y moAto. *n.e aw a Nnre -~-{1/v M q ~rtsw w- -W - W DOO or r • • • ~ p■• r ~ 4••~ ~ B+~•w Mrewavs ~ Nuu Iay o0a w. N/w Va hW I 1~~ .~0 rA 1 w+b Aawr y~m I,~N~~ Il a _ 1►r re 1 aw sr t,17 I . p i ~~r-- ►eswa,... +~....I{. ~"nM"~ n.. 4po6 r i.. ~ ~ ~/e e J~~ dl~^'~'~w ArfPNllOi~ Mti1I, ~ '6SNL/ ~N~f IM ~ _ 1\AO R~'/ VeO 11 t~tl/ If 41 Wa ~r~awrw ~ r Or nr... nqf,unw DII►.+W 0 ~ Lf L~ ~r~y OM(t 1 • s oarwy awM I . ~ I 4 (fe owwl t ~ ~ i ~ f~ us /~war0 nwssvi li rfoo~n• t ~~e~r i a 004 or o ■9-A o • ee ~ ,w.Y,..e ° ~ C~ . ~ ~ . . YI ~ v r--- 2 y ' ~ wNg4 nao~arr...wi ry,p UP , I ~r ! lI'~ r0 wr r~ MUI ~ ~ 9 a ~ ~ s ♦ •rT ~w.+.r 1r~af ~ ~ ~~,ry e ,~,w aw f / ~I f14~~ ~vTVOOR f ~ I oior,,A r I • ~D ~tisA - ,.we ar , 8 r-', w.. ~ ~ ~ I ua lV erw,c..~ri ~ ~ , ~ ~ • ' 40, OVIr9 ~~O f of e on"aoqr O / or~ tls~uwi r~4 ~Ow ♦/O /FO~, ' ~ ~ AOl~/swf 04 r ~jryhl ~erir6 4~ II ' SiTE PLAN E NORTH ' ~ ewa , W r r ~ YICINITY MAp . ~ . - - - - ~ _ _ ~ A . . . PLJBLIC WORKS I)EPE1It'T1VIEN'H' I)IVISION OF BUILDING ANI) PLANNING TO: SPOKANE COLJN'I'Y HEAItIIiiG EXAMINER FR0M: CUIZIZENT PLANNING SEC'TION DATE: SEPTEMBEit 18, 1996 SIJBJEC'H': ZE-31-96; ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESII)EN1'IAL-22 (UR-22) E1R1D NEIGHBORHOOI) BUSINESS (B-1) TO REGIONAL, BUSIIVESS (B-3) I. GENEIZAL. INFORtVIATION Applicant: A R Mirghanban S 2925 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99223 (509) 535-6152 Agent: Dwight Hume Suite 325, S 107 Howard Street Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 456-7402 ' Contact Planner: Steve Davenport, AICP, Planner II I.ocation: Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pines Road (SR-27) and Valleyway ui the SW 1/4 of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Wastungton Proposal: Zone Reclassificauon from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for automotive sales, repair and detauluig gI. SI'TE Ill1FOItMATIOi`1 A. 5ite Siae: Approximately 94 acres B. Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan. The proposal is located within the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan The Major Commercial category is intended to provide the opporturuty for development of commercial uses directly related to major throughways. Highway and artenal stnp commercial areas will usually be made up of businesses or uidividual parcels clustered along a heavily traveled street or highway, each providing off-street parlang 9/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 6 ' The Major Commercial category is intended to be unplemented by the Community Business (B-2) and Regional Business (B-3) zones Tle proposed zone reclassification is consistent with, and unplements the Goals, Objecnves, and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan 2. Aa-terial Road Plan The site is adjacent to Pines Road (SR-27) and Valleyway. Tle Spokane County Artenal Road Plan identifies Pines Road (SR 27) as a state highway owned by the Wastungton State Department of Transportauon (WSDO'1) and dalleyway as a Collector Artenal with a future nght of way width of 70 feet In order to unplement the Plan, the County Engineer has required a stnp of property ten feet in wndth along Valleyway be set aside as a Future Acquisiaon Area. C. Site Characteristics The site has a vacant tire repair and sales facility with the southern pomon of the site being vacant. Curb and sidewallc are existing adjacent to the roadways D. I+teighborhood Characteristics. Tle commercial comdor along Puies Road (SR 27) has rapidly developed in recent years and includes a vanety of retail and office facihties intermixeti with aparmaents and a few remaining single fanuly residences Outside the commercial comdor, the predonunant land use is single farYUly residenaal. E. Zoning Aaalysis Zomng along the Fines Road commercial comdor is pnmanly a mix of business, office and mulu-farruly zones. Tle proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is intended to implement the Major Commercial Category of the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent wnth the ex.isnng zonuig and land use trends Proposal Urban Residenaal-22 (UR-22) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) established in 1991, previously classified as Residential Office (RO) (ZE-8-68) and Local Business (LB) (ZE-146-78C) respectively North Urban Residential-22 (IJR-22) estabhshed in 1991, previously established as 11Rulti-Farruly Suburban (MFS) (ZE-166-73C) South Urban Residenaal-22 (UR-22) estabhshed in 1991, prevYOUSIy classified as Residenaal Office (RO) (ZE-8-68) EasL Urban Residenaal-22 (UR-22) estabhshed in 1991, previously classified as Residenaal Office (RO) (ZE-72-78C). West Regional Business (B-3) (ZE-32-95C) estabhshed in 1995, previously estabhshed as Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) (ZE-99- 55) and Urban Residenaal-22 (UR-22) (ZE-18-76C) F. Land Use Analysis• The proposal is within the Puies Road (SR 27) commercial comdor extending from 16th Avenue to Interstate 90 and includes uses ranguig from automobile sales and offices to apartments. Existing office uses are found to the north, south, east and west of the site. 9/'96 HE S taff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 7 ' • r . G. Circulation The site cwrrendy has two roadway approaches on Pines Road (SR 27) and one approach on Valleyway The southerly most approach an Puies Road (SR 27) vvill be abandoned as future develapment occurs ger WSDOT requirements A tnp ciistnbution analysis, ta the satisfaction of the County Engineer, was completed for this proposal H. I)esign Proposed Site Plan: The site is approximately 40,840 square feet in size and includes an exisung two story building with a showroom, office and six repair bays. Planned improvements to the exisung facilhty mclude paving the southerly gamon vf the site and installing draYnage faclhties and landscaping Use Automative sales, repair, and detarlYng Existing Bmlduig Approximately 5,740 total square feer Site Coverage Approximately 11 % Parking 29 required, 36 pmposed Proposed Bufferingll,andsc~~ing Techniques Apphcation of the Landscaping and Sereenuig Standards are not requueci of this proposal unal such ame as addiaons or alterations to exisnng structures exceeli 50% of the value of the existing structures (Section 14 806 440(2)) Ogher Si#e P1an Consiclerations The site plan subnutteri far review by the Heanng Examiner is general ui nature Derailed revlew to deterrnine comphance with all Code regulauons and conditions of approval is recommended to be admimstraave and to occur at the Bmlding Permit stage I. Drainage- A drainage plan is reqLUred. This pIan must be reviewed and gineer's Division pnQr to development approved by the Counry Eno J. Power Transmession Lu°neslOther Knowra Easerraents None illustrated Any r+eqwred or recorded easements will be disclased dunng the builduig pernut process. K, Water Suppfly The proposal is presently served by Modern Eiectnc Water Company L. Sewage IDisposal The project will be served by a public sewer system Plans and specrfications are w be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Uahties D1v-ision pnor to issuance vf building pemut 1Vg . Schoog The proposal is 1n the Central Valley School Distnct iVo comments were received by the school distncL 9f96 HE Staff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 8 1 e • • N . Fire Protection The proposal is wnthin Fue Distnct No 1 1'he Fire Distnct and the Ihvision of Buildings Deparanent (Fue Marshall) are requued to approve fire protection provisions pnor to the issuance of builduig pernruts 0. Cultural ltesources/Critical tlreas None have been identified III. ENVIRONMEIi1TAL ItEVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the Division of Builciing and Planrung. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available uiformation, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generahzed Comprehensive Plan, and other County pohcies and gwdelines. The Division has determined that "No probable sigruficant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal beuig developed and has issued a Deternun4jtion of Nonslgnific4nce ("DNS") The "DNS" was cuculated to l other agencies of junsdicuon and other agencies,/departments affected by the future development for review and commenL The "DNS" comment penod ends Sept~mber 16, 19% and was advernsed 15 caleadar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners vsnthin 440 feet of the proposal, and by noace on a sign posted on the proposal site The Hearmg Examiner may consider addiaonal envuonmental relateri testirnony at the pubhc hearing IV. BUILDING AND PLANNdNG DIVISION SUMMARX The proposed zone reclassif'ication from Urban Residenaal-22 (LJR-22) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional Business (B-3) is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, and is also consistent wnth land use and zorung trends in the general vicuiity The Division of Building and Planrung recommends approval of the proposal V. COll1DTTIONS OF APPROVAL i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Exaaniner shall be bending on the "Applicant'", which terms shalY include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. i i. The zone rectassification applies to the following real property: Part of 'I'ract 124 og Opportunity, Spokane County, Washengton, described as meginning at a point on the West line of said 1'ract 124, which point is 42 2/3 feet North of the Southwest corner of the Noe-th half of said Tract 124; thence North along the West line of saici Tract 124 a distance of 127 feet; thence East parallel with the line dividing the IYorth and South haldes of said Tract 124 a distance 276.96 feet , more or less, to a point 376.85 feet West of the East lene of said Tract 124 as measured on a lane runneng parallel with the North lene of saed tract 124; thence South parallel 9/96 HE S taff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 9 . with the East flflne of Tract 124 a d'estance of 127 feet, thence West to the poant of beginning; EXCEP'g' the South 56 feet thee-eof; AND EXCEP'T the East 124.5 feet thereof: TOGE'THEIt BVI'TH the BVest 186.9 feet of the North half of Tract 124 of Opportunity, EXCEP'I' the South 169 2/3 feet and Except the IVorth 104.63 feet; as per plat thereof recorded en Voflume "K" of Plats, page 20; Except porteons deeded to the State of Washengton for SR 27 in Deecf recorded under Record'eng No. B405110159. ANI) TOGE'THER WI'TH the North 104.63 feet of the West 186.9 feet of the North half of Tract 124, Opportunity, according to plat recorded sn Volume K" of Plats, Page 20, in Spokane County, BVashington. Except any poe-tion lying within the rights-of way of Pines Road and Valley Way. BUIL,DIRIG AR1D PLAIVii1ING DIVISION 1 The proposal shall comply wnth the Reglonal Business (B-3) and Aquifer Sensiuve Area (ASA) Overlay Zones, as amenderl. 2 The apphcant shall develop subject property generally in accord.ance wnthin the concept presented to the Heanrig Body Vanaaons, when approved by the Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to biulduig locauon, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All vanations must confonn to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zorung Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintauned 3 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Building and Planrung Ihrector/designee shall be subrrutted wnth a performance bond for the project pnor tio release of bmlduig pernuts Landscaping shall be installed and maintauied so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaued. 4. Duect hght from any extenor area hghang fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5 The Builduig and Plammng Division shall prepare and record wnth the Spokane County Auditor a Title Noace noang that the property in quesuon is subject to a vanety of special condiuons imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as pubhc noace of the conciiaons of approval affecting the property in quesuon. The Title Noace should be recorded vvithin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planrung Department The Title Nouce shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property Iega1By describecf as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Admanistrative Official on [ an'posing a 9/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 10 . variety of speceal development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. 6 Approval is requued by the Builchng and Planning Director/designee of a specific hghtmg and signmg plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any bmlduig pemuts 7 The Spokane County Builduig and Planning I?ivision shall prepare and record wnth the County Aud.itor a Title Notice specifying a future land a,cquisition area for road nght-of-way and utihties The reserved future acquisiaon area Title Nouce shall be released, in full or in part, by the Division. The notice should be recorded vvitlun the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following• a At least 10 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utihaes, in addhnon to the exisnng andlor newly dedicated nght-of-way along Valleyway b. Future buildtng and other setbacks requu-ed by the Spokane County Zonuig Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No requued landscaping, parlang, '208' areas, draunfield or allowed signs should be located withui the future acquisiuon area for road nght-of-way and utihties If any of the above unprovements are made wnthin this area, they shall be relocated at the apphcant's expense when roadway unprovements are made d The future acquisiuon area, unal acqwred, shall be pnvate property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any unprovements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered intenm uses e The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interun" improvements at thc urne Spokane County makes roadway unprovements after acquinng said future acquisiaon area 8 The Ihvision of Bmlduig and Planning shall file wnth the Spokane Counry Auditor, vvitlun the same time fiame as allowed for an appeal from the final d.isposition, uicluding lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Noace, which shall gener,-lly provYde as follows: "Pnor to the issuance of any builduig pernut for any builduig or any use on the property descnbed herevn, the apphcant shall be responsible for complyuig wnth the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Secuon 14 706 (Aquifer Sensiuve Area Overlay Zone). Thc property wluch is the subject of this noace is more particularly descnbed as follows " 9/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 11 1 ~ See attached eomrnents and recomrnended conditions of appe-oval from interested agencies. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty, dated September 3, 1996 Spokane County Division of Utilines, dated September 3, 1996 Spokane County Health Distnct, dated August 26, 1996 Washington State Department of Transportaaon, dated July 18, 1996 Spokane County Stormwater Unlity, dated July 15, 1996 Spokane Valley Fire Deparnnent, dated July 24, 1996 Division of Enguieenng and Roads, dated September 18, 1996 9/'96 HE Staff Report for ZE-31-96 Page 12 ~ , • . - - - - . . - - - . . _ . , OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER' S CONDITIONSL OF lai,PPROVAL" REZOPTE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: 09/09/96 PROJECT: B-1 & UR-22 TO B-3 Globe Motors FII.E ZE-031-96/ (DRZE-202-96) Hearing/Review Date: September 18, 1996 Sponsor/Applicant: Dwight Hume Section Township Range: 15-25-44 Planner : Steve Davenport Design/Review Date: (July 18, 1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a bua.lding permst or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer 2 Access permits and improvements to SR 27 must be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (W.S.D.O.T.). 3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans 4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire pro]ect or portion thereof if the development is phased 5. A parking plan and trafzic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 6. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. CC Apolicant Dwiqnt Hume Engineer/Surveyor Ernest M warner 13 Page 2 ' • r July 18, 1996 DR2E-202-96 7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 45 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width along the Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valley Way 10. The applicant should be advised that if remodel improvements exceed SOo of the assessed value of the property, the entire site is required to comply with Spokane County drainage guidelines. Py ~ ~ s - - r > MEMORAN DIJM !j- DATE: July 15, 1996 TO• JO~ PEDERSOtY AND STEVE DAVELNPORT, BUI]LDING AND PLA~►YNIlYG FRONN: KATHERIPfE 1II.LER, STORIIRWA'I'ER UTIIrITYi` RE: FARCEI. # 45153.23249.28Z5, .2303 ZONE RECI.ASSIFICATION CC: Dunng the buiiding permit process, this proposal wiil need to comply with the guidelines for stormwater management The appiicant wiil be nobfied of any requirements dunng the building pemnit process Thank you for the opportunity to comment C UNy Oocumena%saorm memo doc 07/26/96 FRi 13 38_FAX 509 927 SPORA.YE VaLLEY FIRE DE°T BUILDiNG CODES &~ooi , ~ 14 ' SPoKANE \/ALLLEIf FIRE DEPARTMENT • ~ Spo6tane County Flre Protection Drstrlct nlo, l 10319 £ASf SP[LiGUE AVE a SPOKANE WA 992C6'3676 e(509) 928-1700 e FAX (509) 927•2227 ~ [L Pat Humphries Chlef July 24, 1996 S tev'e Daveflport Depactment og Building nnd Planninq 1026 W. Broadway spolcane,wA 9 9 2 6 0 REo Zone Reelassigicafiion Globe Motars Deas Mro Davenport, The Spok=e Valley Fige Depastmerit hss no obj ection to this zotZe reclassificatione Sincege , e ~lles Fige Inspector KH/ sa ~ I~ c b-POK:ANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Y ENNIRONMENTAL HEEiI-TH DMSION Inter-office Commurucation DATE 8-26-96 TO Steve Davenport, AICP Planner II, Spokane County Division of Buildings and Plaruung , FRO1~1 Donald T Lynch, EHS II- EHD, SCHD ~ct,t1VED 16ma- ~ sPoKA;v E COUNTY SUBJECT Proposed Zone Change ZE-31-96 (Globe Motors) 4UC 2 9 1596 1 References DIVISiQN OF aUILDING AND PLANNING BY a) Map of subject, scale 1"= 20', by applicant, dated 5-15-96, received by this office 6-26-96 b) Reconnaissance Geolooc Niap of the West Half of the Sookane Quadranale, WashinQton and Idaho, Allan B Gnggs, 1966 c) Soil Survev_ Sookane Countv, Washineton, Sod Conservation Service, U S D A., March, 1968 d) Sookane Countv. Waslvngton. EnmneennQ Intervretations, Soil Conservation Service, U S D A., August, 1974 e) Sookane Countv Rules and Reizulations for Sewase Disvosal Svstems, 7anuary 19, 1995 fl Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sections 10,14,15,16, and 22 g) Map Greenacres Quadrangle, U S G S, 1973, and Spokane N E, U S G S, 1973 2 Findings a) Tlus project Les over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer b) The project is wrthin Cntical Water Supply Sernce Area #3 and witlun the service area of Niodern Electric Water Distnct Water supply will be a public system c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Nlanagement Area, inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Pnonty Sewer Sernce Area recommended in the '201' Study The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Dtrector of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80 0413 adopted March 24, 1980 The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on=site sewage disposal systems The lot is not of the proper dimensions to pernut the use of both an individual well and sewage system d) The proJect lies in a relatively flat area east of Pines Road and south of Valleyway Local drainaaeways are insigruficant 17 ' i Surface soils are classed by the U S Soil Conservatton Sernce as Gamson Gravelly Loam with 0% to 5% slopes They have a septic tank filter field lirrntation of slight There is also posstble contanunation of groundwater This soll would be classified as a Typc IV fl Geologically, the soils are Glaciofluvial deposits These geological structures generally yield moderate to very large amounts of water Data from wells in the area referenced in section lf shows they are from 73' to 250' deep and have static water levels varying from 47' to 158' below the surface The Modern Electnc Water Distnct has indicated that it caap supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent 3 Requved (mandatory) Conditions If Approved a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utdities, Spokane County b) Water sernce shall be coordinated through the Director of Utdities, Spokane County c) Water service shall be by an e.cisting public water supply when approved by the Regional Engneer (Spokane), State Department of Health d) A public sewer system will be made avadable for the project and individual service will be provided prior to sale Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems sha11 not be authonzed 4 Recc :vnended Conditions of Approva] a) Use of pnvate wetls and water systems is prohibited c :)trec::r of Utilities, Spokane County c ~ pons,r Globe Motors C/O Dwight Hume 107 S Howard, STE 325 Spokane, WA 99204 taI& •Wfg 18 • r~E~Ei JcD SFOKANE COUN i" . v V EI 0 4 1996 ~ OIVIS(CN OF 6UIlDING AND PV4NNING SPOKANE COUNTY 3Y C~ CLEI.~.Rt~`j.~ A1R POIlUTION S P o K A N E CONTAOL AUTHOR(TY WEST 1101 COILEGE SU17E 403 • SPOKANE WA 99201 ~(509) 456-4727 Fax (509) 459 6828 Date September 3, 1996 To Steve Davenport, Planner Spokane County From Matt Holmquist, Air Quality Specialist II Spokane County Air Pollution Contr Authonty SubJect SCAPCA COMMENTS REGARDING ZE-31-96 B-1 and UR-22 to 8-3 Sec 15-25-44 The Spokane County Arr Pollution Control Authonty (SCAPCA) was formed under the authority of the 1967 C/ean Air Act of Washington (RCW) That Act reqwred counties, like Spokane County, to activate loca/ air pollution contro/ agencies To meet the requirements of that Act, SCAPCA adopted regulations to contro/ the emissions of a►r contaminants from sources within Spokane County Portions of Spokane County fail to meet federal health standards for particulate emissions (dust and smoke) and carbon monoxide Numerous strategies have been imp/emented to reduce air pollution emissions so that we can improve air quality and meet hea/th standards Followmg Is a list of concernslssues fhat, at a minimum, need to be addressed for proposed projects Addrtional comments may result after more detarled informahon of the project is supplied SCAPCA encourages proponents to contact their offices at 1101 West College, Spokane, WA 99201 for additional informatron * All air pollution regulations must be met Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions dunng demolition, construction and excavation projecis be controlled This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers or suspension of activity dunng certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controiled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities ' SCAPCA strongly recommends that ail traveiled surfaces (i e, ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) be paved and kept ciean to minimize dust emissions * Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spilis occur on paved surFaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces Page 1 of 2 .J • 1 . Page 2 of 2 ' SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V requires that a Notice of Construction and Application for Approvai be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the construction, installation or establishment of an air poilution source Based of historical information, it is logical to assume that the following air pollution sources may be present at the proposed facility o One or more Prep Decks o One or more Paint booths ■ One or more Paint Cunng Devices (naturai gas or other fuel) Ei One or more Solvent Tanks or Spray Area * SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV may require registration with this agency SCAPCA Regulation I, Articie VI, and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV, address emission standards All emission standards must be met ' Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i e, construction waste, removed vegetation, etc ) Demolition and renovation projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40, Part 61, Subpart M and SCAPCA Regulation I, Articie IX, which address asbestos abatement issues Intent to Demolish forms are available at the SCAPCA office Failure to meet SCAPCA regulations may result in delays, closure and civil and/or cnminal sanctions Z0 . , ` • r ~ r To: STEVE DAVENPORT, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner From Spokane County UtBlities Date: 9/3I96 Subject Conditions of Approval Planning AcYion Plumber: ZE-0031-96 Type of AcYion ZR Zone'Reclass from B-1 to UR-22 Applieanrt Globe Motors C/O Dwight Hume Legal Owner• Mirghanban, A R 107 S Howard, Ste 325 2925 S Mt Vernon Spokane WA 99204 SpoEcane WA 99223 Sewer Service• SS09 A wet (live) sewer connect►on to the area-wide Pubiic Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer cannecfion permit is required (See i#em 12) SS12 Applicant shall submit expressfy to Spolcane County Utilities Department "under separate covee", only thoseJpian sheets showing sewer plans and specificatrons for (I)Public Sewer Connectons and Facilites lille ( AcebApIt, for review and approval pnor to the ftnalizabon of the projec# and or the issuance of permit to connect (1) SS15 Arrangements for payments ofi applicable sewer charges must be made for pnor tv issuance of sewer connection pennit Water Seevice WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provrded in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended 2r r . J s J M ~ Wa5h9ngtOQ1 State Eastevn Region Tr~~~portation 2714 N Mayfair Streer Spokane WA 99207 2090 Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000 July 18, 1996 Mr Steve Davenport Spokane County Planrung Department VV 1026 Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re Globe Motors Rezone Request (SR 27 and Valleyway) Dear Mr Davenport Thank you for the opporturuty to respond to the above development proposal The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the followmg comments m Due to the lack of available intersection capacrty at the Pines Road (SR 27) and I-90 interchange VNSDOT cannot support projects which will further adversely affect this interchange Due to the limited traffic generation associated with this re-zone request we would ask that the apphcant subrn.it written documentation of the expected traffic generation for ttus car lot and the proposed paths this traffic wnll use This traffic documentation will need to be submitted pnor to a SEPA deternunation being reached for this development In addition to the above comments we would request that the following be applied as conditions of approval to this development 0 The southerly access point to Pines Road does not meet the Wastungton State Access Management Spacing Law spacuig cnteria Access to this site vvill need to be accommodated by the existing northerly access point on Pines Road This approach will need to conform to WSDOT design specifications An updated road approach pernut wnll need to be obtained for access to Pines Road prior to construction occui-ring on this site If you should have any questions on this matter ple3se feel free to contact myself or Greg Figg in our planning department at 324-6199 Smcerely, L ONARD C CASH, PE Regional Planrung Engneer LCC/gf cc Dwnght Hume, Apphcant Scott Englehard, Spokane County Engineers 2Z ~ . ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE C4UNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3500 Fax 324-3478 "E1vGINEER' S CONDITIQNSL 4F APPROVAL" REZflNE TQ: Spokane County Planning Department ' FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: 09/09/96 PRQJECT: B-1 & UR-22 T4 B-3 Globe Psotors FILE ZE-031-96/ (DRZE-202-96) Hearing/Review Date: September 18, 1996 Sponsor/Appllcarat Dwight Hume Section Township Range • 15-25-44 Planner: Steve Davenport Design/Review Date• (July 18, 1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Enga.neering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted tv the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use af property as propvsed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2 Access permits and improvements to SR 27 must be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportatian (W S D.C? T.). 3 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and aecess plans 4 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detazled combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the enta.re pro3ect or portian thereof if the development is phased 5 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect whieh ls tca be accupied or traveled by vehicles 6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicablz county standards and/or adopted resolutiQns pertaining ta Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of canstruction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer CC Applicant Dwight Hume Engineer/Surveyar Ernest M Warner , o . ~ Page 2 July 18, 1996 DRZE-202-96 7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is sub3ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 9. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70 foot Collector Arterial The existing right of way width of 45 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width along the Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valley Way 10 The applicant should be advised that if remodel improvements exceed 50% of the assessed value of the property, the entire site is required to comply with Spokane County drainage guidelines. . ~ ; t . S O U N T Y DEPARTMEM OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEM ]AMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNLS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District Modern Electric Water Company Fire District No. 1 FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: June 27, 1996 RE: Zone Reclassification from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential- 22 (LJR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING JULY 18,1996 AT 1:15 P. M. DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1'` FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN xEvIEw FoRMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Steve Davenport of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205. c: Dwight Hume, 107 S. Howard Ste, 325, Spokane WA 99204 A. R. Mirghanbari, 2925 S. Mt. Vernon, Spokane WA 99223 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WESC BROADWAY AVFN[JE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 Bvn.DUVG I'HONE: (509) 456-3675 • Fnx: (509) 456-4703 Pt.ANNtNG PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAX: (509) 456-2243 Tnn• r1;n4N'A74_'A1 tir, . ~ APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Date: Y 9 ~C, r Department: ~r- cEL Department Contact Person: Steve Davenport, Planner II Action: Zone Reclassification from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential- 22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (13-3) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: luly 18, 1996 at 1:15 P.M. 1Vote: ' The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduline of the annlication on the Public Hearing Agenda is the pnmary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a nreliminarv review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the infonnation (not all agencies/departments have been contacted--only those who have been determined to have primary interest. 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? EJYES ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminarv review of the annlication what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) ~ Washington State Eastern Region ~ Department of Transportation 2714 N. M°,` zir _ , Spokane, Wr Sid Morrison Secretary of T,arspcrtation July 18, 1996 Mr. Steve Davenport Spokane County Planning Department W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re: Globe Motors Rezone Request (SR 27 and Valleyway) Dear Mr. Davenport: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above development proposal. Ti;e Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has the following comments: • Due to the lack of available intersection capacity at the Pines Road (SR 27) and I-9~ ~ interchange WSDOT cannot support projects which will further adversely affect this interchange. Due to the Gmited traffic generation associated with this re-zone request v, e would ask that the applicant submit written documentation of the expected traffic generation for this car lot and the proposed paths this traffic will use. This traffic documentation will need to be submitted prior to a SEPA determination being reached for this development. In addition to the above comments we would request that the following be applied as conditions of approval to this development: • The southerly access point to Pines Road does not meet the Washington State Access Management Spacing Law spacing criteria. Access to this site will need to be accommodated by the existing northerly access point on Pines Road. This approach will need to conform to WSDOT design specifications. An updated road approach permit will need to be obtained for access to Pines Road prior to construction occurring on this site. If you should have any questions on this matter please feel free to contact myself or Greg Figg in our planning department at 324-6199. Sincerely, L ONARD C. CASH, PE Regional Planning Engineer LCC/:. ~cc: Scott EnQlehard, Spokan~ . • a` • - INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECEIVED . SPOKANE COUNTY 2 6 1996 July 23, 1996 DIVI810N OF BUILDlNO ANO PLANNINa W.O. No. 96157 BY: wIAr, Q.~ oF W Scott Englehart Spokane County Engineers o h ~c W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 0, 31398 ~ RE: Globe Motors Rezone Traffic Distribution s`r~ON Dear Scott, EXPIRES 5111 4~"l I have been contacted by Dwight Hume, a representative for Globe Motors, to perform a brief trip distribution for the potential Globe Motors site at Pines & Valleyway. As I understand the project, the proposed Globe Motors site involves two existing parcels, one zoned B-1 and the other zoned UR-22. The B-1 site was previously used for an auto repair shop/tire store, and this building will be used by Globe Motors for their operations on this site. The UR-22 site is presently vacant, but for purposes of this trip distribution analysis, it wili be analyzed at it's most intense use under the UR-22 zoning criteria. Based upon the site's location and size, it appears that its most intense use is something under the "business and professional office" heading in the zoning code, which was assumed to be a bank with a drive-in window. A bank with these characteristics could easily locate on a 18,000 square foot site, the size of this parcel. Trip generation characteristics of a Drive-in Bank as outlined in the Trip Generation Manual, Sth Fdition published by the Institute of Transportation Enginecrs were used for this analvsis. 'Ic-ip geileration cllaracteristics of'the B-1 site, the tire and auto repair site, were obtaiiied fi•om the previous owner and are also found in the SEPA checklist. Based upon the previous owner's experience, about eight trips generated by employees will enter this site in the AM peak hour, about 20-25 trips wiil occur during the day, but at off peak hours, and eight trips, again generated by the employees, will exit the site in the PM peak hour. Potential trip generation characteristics of the bank which could locate on the UR-'? site. and the trip generation characteristics of the B-1 site are shmvn on Table 1 w-hich follows. Vti'e,t .'th - Juite 100 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Cceur d'Alene, 10 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 , ' • . . W IN~l W"s~i►l,~, . y ' Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter b ~ July 23, 1996 ~o ~ 12 31398 Page 2 ~?1s4kip l Gti ~NALti~ Table 1- Trip Generation - Potential under Existing Zoning EXPIRES 5/1/ oi ~ Laod Use PM Peak Hour KSF ; ~ Vol. @ 43.63 trips per Directional Distribution ; ~ ; : KSF 48% In 52% Out Bank 4 175 84 91 New Trips 88 42 46 Pass-by 87 42 45 Trips Vol. Based oo Field Trips In Trips Out Cond. Tire/ Repair Store 1.9 8 0 8 >:::.:::.;::;>::::>::«;:<,::..;.:< : . :::z:::::::»:;:::. .<::::::::<::::.::::;:.:::::;:: ..:.....~~t . . . Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) Laod Use KSF Rate Total ADT Bank 4 265.21 1,061 = Tire/repair shop 1.9 * 56-66 ; . , ~ >:::<::r" ~ > . . ~ ~ . . .~c~~.~.;;:.:.;::.:.:.;::.:.::.:<:.::. I,: . . : : : , . : , KSF - Tliousaiid Square Feel * Rate based on field conditions The trips going to and from the bank will be partly pass-by trips, since some of the patrons of the bank will already use Pines Road on their way to and from work. As Table 1 show, this is estimated to be 50% of the trips to and from the bank. Therefore, for the existing zoning and potential land uses, this site could generate 183 trips, 96 of which would be trips on the transportation system specifically to use the services at this location. Under the proposed rezone and site plan, the trip generation characteristics of the site, based upon Globe Motors other two locations in Spokane, are shown in Table 2. The information in Table 2 was derived from the SEPA checklist, and includes some customer trips in with the employee trips. Globe Motors does not operate their repair facilities on a first come first serve basis. Repair work done at a Globe Motors facility is scheduled ahead of time and the customers . . ~ ~ wI'V~ "`'~s ~A ~ ~ Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter July 23, 1996 ~ Page 3 313981 ~ R ~s`~~onr At ti~G~ IEXPIRES 5/ 1 / ~I ~ using Globe Motors come to the site for their appointments. These appointments are scheduled throughout the day, but not during the peak hours. A second item to note with regards to trip generation characteristics particular to Globe Motors, is that the car lot generates about four or five customers per day. The big trip generation day for the car lot is Saturday. Therefore, the uses within Globe Motors do not generate much peak hour traffic. The majority of their traffic occurs either on the weekends, or during the middle of the weekday. Table 2- Trip Generation - Potential under Proposed Zoning with Proposed Uses AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour KSF Traffic Directional Traffic Directional Volumes Distribution Volumes Distribution Trips In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out 1.9 8 6 1 6 4 2 Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) ; ' . ~ KSF Rate Total ADT - 1.9 * 60 , rate based on field conditions Under the proposed zoning and uses for the site, about 7 trips in the PM peak hour could be , expected to be generated. This is a reduction of 89 trips from the potential uses of the two parcels under existing zoning. ~ Under the existing zoning, about 60% (50 trips) of the trips generated to this site in the PM peak hour could be expected to come from the north, with the majority of them passing through the Pines/I-90 interchange. The uses ProPosed bY Globe Motors are Point destination uses, as allowed under the B-3 I Regional Business zoning category. Therefore, many of these trips will also use the Pines/I-90 ~ interchange. However, even if as many as 80% of the trips to and from this site use the Pines/I- 90 interchange, this would total6 trips in the AM peak hour and 5 trips in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, this is a reduction of 45 trips below what could be generated by this site under the existing zoning. ~ . r • ~ ♦ L Globe Motors Trip Distribution Letter July 23, 1996 Page 4 Therefore, based upon the trip generation and trip distribution characteristics of the existing site versus the proposed uses and site plan of this proposal, the rezoning the site serves to lessen the impacts to the transportation system from this site. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. If you need any additional information on this issue, please let me know. Sincerely, . . 6\4Aeo~ (D~~ ~ ~ Ann L. Winkler, P.E. AL W/alw I cc: John Pederson, Spokane County Planning Dwight Hume wIN wAs 0 p~ R 31398~ ~O N AL ES 511I O~ ~ EXPIR r TL ~ `~a6 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 TF SPOIUNE ENYIROtMENTAL OROINANCE (YAL 197-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1) + . Envlrorniental Checkltst F11e No.~~ Puryose of Check 11 st : The State Environmental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, reQutres ail 9overrwental agencles to consiCer the environaental impacts of a proposal Defare arking Aecisions. An Envlronmntal lwpact Statenent (E1S) wust be prepared for alt proposals rlth proDaDle siqnificant adverse impacts on the qwlity of the envirorwent. The purpose of this checkllst 1s to provide inforaution to helo you and the aqency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid i.paCts from the proposal, 1f 1t can be done) and to help the agenty Qettde whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist aSks you to descrlbe soae bas1t infonu tion about your proposal. Goverrwmental agencles use this checklist to deterrnine rhethtr the environmntal tupacts of your proposal are stgnlflcant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the qutitions brtefly, ritA the most pretise inforwatlon knawn. or glve the best destrlptton you can. You must ansMer each questton atcurately and carelully, to the best of your kn a+ledqe. ln oost cases. you should be able to answer the questions frow your orn obsenratlons or projett plans wlthaut the need to hire experts. lf you really do not knor the snswtr. or if a Question does not apply to your proposal, vrite 'Oo not know• or 'does not apply.' Camqlete answers to the qw stions nor w y avold unnecessary delays later. Soae qw stions ask about qovernwenta) regulstions, such as roning. shorellns. and lanaaark Cesl9nations. Answer these questlons if you can. lf you have proble*s. the qoverrrentai agencles can asstst you. The checklSst questlons apply to al) parts of your proposal. even 1t you D1an to do theu over a ptrlod of t1me or on difterent partels of 1anE. Attach any additional tnforwytton tAat w111 desCrlbe your proposal or its environnental effetts. The aqency to whicA you suDett thts checklist aay ask you to explain your answers or provide adGltlonal inforuation reasonably related to dettrrotning tf there way be slgniftcant adverse imoact. Use of chectllst Ior nonpro,yect proposals: Ca.piete thls checklist for nonproject proposals. even thouqh questions may be ansrereE 'does not •oply'. IN ADOiT10N. cauplete the SUP*LEMEMTAL SHEET FOIt NO!IPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). For nonproject acttons. the references tn tAe checkllst to the words 'project.' 'appllcant,' and 'property o► site' should De reid •s 'propossl." sproDOSer.' and 'affected qeoqraphlc area.' respecttvely. A. BALXGROUND 1. 'fame of proposed project. 1f a0P11table: I101 10 2. Mame of Appltcant: 3. Address and pAone numDer of app 11unt or conUct person: $ 3~ ~ ~/sG - 7U0Z 4. Date checklist pnpared: 5. A9encr reauesc+r►y check 11st: U.S'~>a A(i~.,,~ ~ Li ij 74W 3 v•le/Zlti f!~/ ✓ v ~ 6. Proposed tlminq or Sthedule (includinq phaslnq, tf applltable): / ~,-r~ _s~,-r~ •~P ~ l99G 7. a. Do you have any plans for future addltions. expanslon, or further attirity related to or cornetted rith thls DroPossl? lf yes, explsin. b. Do you own or hsve optlons on land nearDy or adjacent to thls proposal? It yes, explaln. 8. List any environmntal inforwatlon you knov about that has ban prepared, or ril) be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ~ ~P ✓'~U v.5 ~"P_ ~~rr7P ~.vi ~,~'i~!'!i r' i/S P_ ~ ~~J,~'~° S~vr~ ~ ~v~v ~c i S . v Rev.2/1/88 1 • ' ' • StUuM Eiro^txoMExM 6RnirIAtacE (u.c 197-11-960) s.ctsoo u.10.230(l) A. B=GROMD i c ont 1 mud 1 . - 9• Do rou lmar xhetFrrr appLieatloas are peadiag for `arecsamntal approvaia ot o[hcr pcopasals dirsctlr afiecting the praq►arty cdvsrad try yeur propaia.L? Tf yes, esple4n. r'1 LU. Liat aax goveramoc apptoaals or persica that vtll he n"ded for raur propoaal. Lt lmnwn. ee -.rr~~, ,~Ls ~ ~ . /~.'~f 11. Glre a brief. ctapinte doocripCior+ af rour prQposal, tntluding the propused uses and [t+ie 41s• of tfis pro]ect and ti[e. 'heze are eevrral questivoa l.oter lp chi• chrelellst [hat •tk you to describe eertrin aapeets o[ rour prapcsal. Yw do no[ need To tepaat thome anaver■ on Ch1s pags. ~fL`/ 1~ l l l O 4 ~ -i ~C . el/ f.~ 5ec/ 1 12. tsacaclon vf the peopvsal. Gin ■uffLcien[ SafuzmaEion [or a peCiOp [o ursdrra[and the preelse locasian of yaur propnmed project, lncluding a straet sddress, if aay, and sectian. twaship aod ranse, if knawn. I[ ■ proposal rould atcur aver a range of area, prnvtde the raawge or Dcundaries of the sitt(a). Provtde s le`al darcrlption, ■ltt plxa, rltietit'y aap, and CopolrapRic a&p, i!` rearanahly available. 47ltile you skwuid suhait any plaaa requ[red by the agrner, you are not requteed to dupllcst• aap■ or detallyd plaaa ruhEit[od rlth any permit apgafcattQn [eLted to thls chec'kiliC. --Z5/ Jt ~ ~~?i l'~°. ~j,/YY7Lt ✓~j d' (j~~jl" -t:3 ~ ~ r~J frl~r~ Gt~i+W s . r7P_ S • ~ ,-p~ A1 i _ 4165, L L C, Z L/ f G 13. Does the proposed ae[ion lit vlthla the Aqui(eY 5onritfwe Area (ASA)? -he Cenatal Sewsr Servtct Araa? ^tre priority Sever Serviet Area' `he City of Spok,uat? ('See: Spakaue Gounty'a ASA OvsrLay Lont A[Ls tor boundaries}. 1 ' 1 Y~ '"U b! COKYI.S"E4 El' APPLSClItIT E. Ll~PI1ttYAl~lP'.1~1. ~5 { ~ Evaluaston Far r1 I ~ EAR.»n _ Ageaney Ume Onky \ a. Grnetal dascrip[ian of the •lts (elrele oneY,ti f1.at~sLng,. hiliy, rceeg rlapes, mnuntainex:s, aCher: b. `►hat 1• the ataepsat slopt on the ait• (rppraxisat+ prrceac sLopi)? C. 'rha[ geaeral typer of ■oils are fouad qn the site (far esasple, clay, aaad, srarsl, psat, 4uck)' tf yau kaov the c1a"lffcaGiaa of a=ricultural soitr, spaclfy chra and nocs ■ey prim farsl&nd. ~/~/C31J.1 ~-~'~f~/°,~- ~r~r'~.~lT✓r L/ C! ~ d. kre thsre wriaca indfutioer nr history of unaCable roils in the tsai,ee#late viciait'" IC ■Q, deicrllx. 2 . ~ ~ - SPOKANE ENYIRONMENTAI'OftOINANCE (uAt 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 9. ENViROM1EMTAL ELEMENTS(tontlnued) ~ ► Evaluation For Agency Use Only e. Descrlbe the purpose, type. and approzlmte qwntlties of •ny f1111ng or grading proposed. lndicate source of f111. /1J~n-r P f. Could erasion o a ur as a result of clearing. constructfon. or use? If so, qenerally descrlbe. /vQ g. About what percent of the site rill pe covlred Mtth tapervious surtaces after project construc- tion (for exaniple, asphalt or buildtngs)? D h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or othtr 1nqacts to tNe eartA. if any: 2. AIR a. What type of etissions to [he Air rould result fros the propoial (i.t.. dust. sutomoblle, odors industrial, wooC sacke) durinq constructton •nE when tAe project 1s c apleted? lf any. generally describe anE give approaisate quantttes if known. " w .e rrlCSSiemS b. Are there •ny off-site sources of Mlssions or odor that may •ffect your proposal? If so. generally destrlbe. v~ ~i - / ' `~1 L° S ~GC/ T ✓'G! ~ L / C. Proposed measures to reduCt or COntrol emifsloni or ot Mr lspatts t0 air, it any: JC'~ c~m~r 3. 41ATER a. Surfact: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the iamedtate vlcinity of the stte lncludinq year- round an0 seasonal streans. saltw ter. lakes, Oonds, wetlandsl? lf yes, de uribe typt and provide nanies. If appropriate, stste rhat stream or river 1t flows into. iT l/) (2) Wil) tDe projed requlre any work over, 1n. or Adjatent to (wlthln 200 feet) the destriDed waters? lf yes, please describe and atLacA avallable plans. /UQ 3 s~nn~tu. o~i~uaz I ('aAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) •srarArs . . ~ / 1. CNVIROtIlQNTAI, tLZMU.'ll':S (continued) Lvalwtion For Nsency Use Onlr (l) Eacimce che amouat of till and dredge m[erial that vould bs p Leed in or removed from clu surfac• vatsr or vetland• •nd indieats the •ru of che site ttvc vould be aftecced. Ledicat• thc •ource of till rterial. xv.e~_ (4) ytll the proposal require surface wator vithdrawl& oc Alverolona' Cive a general deserip- cfon, purpose, sad approxiaate qumotities, if lcnova. ~U (5) Does che proposal 11• vithin • 100-y ur flood plala? II so, ao « lou tlon oa the site plaa. /V d (5) Ooes c!u propo"l involve •nr disclu rQes o[ vsste astierial• [o •urtaee vacera? If •o, describe the type of wsc• and actlclpaced volum of diselu r=e. !~(J d b. Cround: (1) Will `roundvater be vithdrava, or vill vacer be discharged to groundvater' Cive gsaeral dsscrlptlon, purpose. •nd appro:fmate QWO[1[1fs, it Imown. (2) OsscriDe vaste aaterial tfuc vlll be discharged lato the &[ouod lrm septic tank• or ocT+er sauitary vasc• crw oent tacility. DescriDe the gsoeral sis• of c1r oyacm. the oumDer of houses [o be sf[Yed (it applieaple) or t M auabar of persoos the arstas(s) are espeeted to •erve. (7) Dtserlbe •ny a7rstas. ocl+er thao chos• designed tor the Aispo"l of M01CaTr vute, tnscalled for cM purposs of dischar`los [luid• belov the grouod sYtfK e (lnclude• •rstq• •uch •s those tor the dlsposal of @tors vater or draloagt Irom tloor drains). Deseribe tlw typs o[ sYscem, the •mouac of material to M dispoasd of tArougA tlr srstes aad the type• of material• likely co be dloposod o[ (lncludla& materials vhicA mar soter tM syscm leadw rcently chrough apille or a• • resulc of t1reilghclng aetivltios). ~ l. ~vt -c (4) yill any chaleals (especiallr orgauic solvento or petroleum fw 1s) be storod lo abow- around or uoderground •cora=e taduY It so, vtuc types aod auaotitie• of mcarisl• vl11 ba stored? Gc~- / 4 lTOtjlIL GIYIldtllQli'fA[. 01DItiAIICi (VAC i97-11-960) Sectioa 11.10.230(1) • ' ' - ' ~ ~ 3. LnYIxOOMRiAL LI.ZMEM (GOaClouad) tvalwtioa ►or Ag.ocy u.. onlr (S) uhac proceeciw smasure• vill be talun to iwure tt+at l"ke or spilli of aoy cheaical• •tored or wed oo slts vtll not Ee aLlowd to psreolats to groundvater (this inelude• susure• to kssp chesicals wt of disposal s7►stma described io 3b(2) aod 3e(3).' c. Water Runo[f (ineludiag ston vacsr): (1) Deseribe tfu souree of cunoft (laeluAlag stocm vater) aed w[hod of colleetioa and disposal i[ anr (laclud• ausaticioe. 1I knova). WMrs vill chl• water tlovT YS11 thi• water Ilov into otAer vaters' LI so, deser1Ee. : ~ - 9 ~ V-p- C7~o,~n (2) Jtll any eMdeal• be •coted. haadled or wed oa t1+e site !e a loutloo vMr• a •pill of lsak vill draLa to surtaes or groundvater or to • ston water dispoaal @yetem disclurging to •urface or groundNter? W-~ Could veate wtorlal• •nter iround or •urtac• waterst It so. a.n.r.iir dascribe. d. Proposed msasurs• to reduce or eoatcol surlace. grwnd, aod evno!( vacer Lpacts, tt •ay (lI c the proposed aetion 11e• vithic tl►e Avuiler Soeaitive Aru be espeeially clu r oo explanatioos r relacing to [acilitie• eoocernlos Sectlooa 3►(4) 7b(5). •ad 3c(2) of this eMckllat): 57 ~ zaP A 4. ruvrs a. Teek or circle trpe of ragotatlon toued on tM •lts: doeiduow tree: alder, "ple, •spen, ottu r. _YI evergreen tree: f1r. cader, pine, otMr. ~ shcubs. ~ `rass. paature. crop oT Sralo. wt *oil pLnts. cattail. Duttereup, pullrwh, akuoic eaDLage, otlrr. uster plaats: vatec lillr, selgrose, sLlltoil, otheT. other crpes of vegetatioa. b. Vhat kied and aniouet of wg*tatloa vill M rmo wd or altsredt GU~~lf C~ 1~4.55e~5 C~./ ~ i~~ ~`ef1~~✓L°Gr • i-~GYScwi~. 1"-- r c. List threatsned or eadaass[id spscies Imora to be oa or aear [tN site. 174 d. Proposed landacapin`, we of oative pLnts, or otler muures to preserve or aahaoce w{etatioo on th• •i«, 1f anr: S-P.e Sr~-e . 5 SPOKJtIIE ENYiR01fl#NTAL OROINANCE ' (WAC 197-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1) . . . . • . B. EHVIROMIENTAL ELE?IENTS (contlnwA) . , Evaluatlon For Agency Usc Only 5. AN1M1lLS a. Circle any birds anG anisals rhich have been observe0 on or n"r the site or are knwn to be on or near the s1te: birds: hawk. heron, esgle. qQ_4lyd1.,)other: nbmmais: deer, bear, elk, beaver. other: f1sh: bass. salmon, trout, herring. sheilfish. other: other: b. L1st any tAreatened or endangered species knwn to be on or nMr the s1te. c. Is the site part of a migration routt? lf so. explain. d. Proposed rseasures to preservt or enhance v11d11fe, 1f •ny: 6. ENERGY AND NATUiiAI RESOURCES 6, 11hat kinds of energy (tlectric. natural gas, wood stove, solar) vtll be use0 to met the the coapleted project's energy needs? Descrtbe whether 1t w111 De useC for heating. manuf u- turing, etG. v - h. uould your project affett the potentlal use of solar energy br adjatent propertiei? if so. generelly describe. /I U c. What kinds of energy conservation ftatures art lncluded 1n tht plans o1 th/s propoial' L1st othtr proposed uessures to reduce or control energy taqatts, if any: U ~ 1. ENVIRONMENTIIL HEALTH a. Are tnere any envirorwntal health hatards. lnctudtn9 txposure to toxlc chewicals. risk of flre and explosion. splll, or hazardous waste, that could oaur as a result of thls proposal? If so, describe. (1) Describt speCtal energency servlces thsc might De required. e_ ' ~ 6 • - (uAC 197-I1-960) Seetioa 11.10.270(1) lIOR►M QIV11dlQRRlJL OtDI]lA11C! 1. VIYIROIMENM LLZKELS (COOC1AWd) C1Ii1WC10A FOC ' AjeoCy 0se Oply L1iYIR0lRdSRAL HEAL:H (cootlowd) (2) Troposed maasures to redue• or cootrol aovlcoorntal Malth ltasards, St aoy: b. Nolse: (1) What crpes of ooise s=int io the aru vdieh may •ffeet rour projeet (for aLmpla: traffle. •qulpmnc, opsra[loo, otlrec' ~r! P 5 ~.L T/bc 7~~ L- (2) What typss aoE levels of noiss vould be cruttd bry or •saociated vlth t M project oo • short-csn or a long-ten basis (!or exaaple: trsitic, concruccioa, operacioo, othar)' Iadicate what hour• e►oise vould com fra• the •lte. s-r, v~ - .~lT lG/~GCf , ✓lc ~ ~ ~ / ~ S l.s S O Proposed uu suse [o educe or concrol noise Lmpacts, ll aay: 0 v ✓~S v ~ .~r v~2_ CliL4_ ~~~N e..~ t,.~ ' ~YJ-' ~ 8. la'(D AND SNOREL!!IL USE a. What 1o the current ws ot the •ite and adjaceac propectles1 i~e 571e r`e1*W'' A/, Orv-l ~-e--//Fuw{acX 1/Y...G b. Ilae Fhe aice beea used tor ~~riculture' If so, describe. Q c. Describe any structures on tM site. ~'g~, r• f ~ .5 7 5~0 .s ~ 14v,46 1'et-1v, J r• ~ a~Ja U d. V111 any •truccure• be desolished? i[ •o, vhich? 1-1(J e. What L• cM eurrenc :onini classifieatioo o[ the •it*t 0-/ 5'~a • ~ Z f. What is tAe current easprtlreosire pLn desisaacion o[ the site3 p ✓ - . 9. I[ applleable, vhat 1• the eutreac •horolias Ystei progrm desigwtion ot the site! / v 4- h. Fis• aoy psrt of the @it• bwn clauifiad as an 'enviroaeotally NYitive' •esaT If so, specify. /C/r) i Approziaacely hov zaoy peopl• vould reside or vork in tAe cmplsted ptojeect 6-1v 7 ~ 4!'ORME 6~VI10RLRL~1. OImI[WICE (WAC 197-11-960) Seetioa 11.10.230(1) ~ D. LNVIROMmMA1. Q.ZKE1fTS (eoutinnsd) ' • !valwtion for 11gency Use Only j. Appro:i~telr hov san7 people vould Che couplated projeet dlsplacst t. Troposed wsures to •void or reduee d1spLemeoc Lmpaets. i[ any: G v~ 1. Proposed masure• to easure c!r proposal is empatible vltA nistlng aod projecced :end u,e. .h; plans, !f aor: '5:ee 9. NOUSINC S. Appro:isately twr aany unlts vould De provided. it anyt Iodicate v6ntM r hlgh-9 middle-, ~~r loriocom houslaj. D. Approslmtelr hov saap ualto. if •oy, vould Ee eilaloatedt Iodiut• vhrtl+er high-, aiddle-, or lowincome houslng. c. ProposeA •uoure• to reduce or coocrol housing lmpaecs. it aor: 'V ~ 10. ALSTIIC'fiCS Vhat ls the tallast hs1gDt ot •ny proposed occueture(e), not laclud2or autonoaO Yh&t t• t!►e pcincipal s:tertor buildiad "cerial(s) proponed' .-C ~ . S~✓~~ r r~~.L , b. tlhac viev• in che imadiace vlcinitp vould De alteted or obst nutedt c. Proposed Masuce• to toduce or cootrol aeet Mtie lapacts. ~f a^^ ~ -1 P.~n. Gt rt ~ U T 11. LIGH:' AND G[.AAL 'I1ut trp• ot 1lgAt or gLre vill tte propowl pcodueet :1Aat tiN of da7r vould !t aalaly oc.cur' ~ U E. Could light or gLre froa t!e tinlsMd project Ee a sate[7 haeard or latertece vitA •laNt 419 c. Vhac •:iscing off-sic• ~ re~a of lighc or gLro wy ~ll~f} 7our proPooalt d~F~ C' ~C ~ 7 ✓G~~~" ' - d. Proposed Ltiun e to reduee or cootrol light and glare lapaccs, Sf aoy: e SPOR IROMMENT&L OtDINA1ICL ~ 7-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) IAOtlKERflL dMItMi4 (contiowd) Lralwtioo Por V1>' A`eacy Ust Only CRLA7TON Vhst desiraaced sad intoraal recsutionsl opporcwitie• •re ta the lmsediate vieiait)' Would the proposed ploject dispLee aar o:iscina recseaciooal usest 2f so, da*ccib*. c. Propoosd waure• co reduct or eonczol impacts oa recrutios, laclu4leg recrMtiowl opportuai- tie• co be providaE Ery cha pcoject or •pplicant, i! •op: . HIS"ORIC AND CULTUAAL PRtSERYA:TON Are tiw re snr piaca• or ob rct• llsted oa or prapossd for natioo&l, scac• or locai prosorva- [!oe rs;lstsrs knorn to be on or aa:t to the sitet if so, ;oneraliq deacribe. b. G aerally describe any 1aMrArte or evidence of hiotorie arcAaetologieal, acteaclfic or culcusal importaae• Imavn co Ee oo ar nArt to the aLte. lL+~C~2.~--- c. Proposed seasu=es to reduce os controi lrpacts. lf says N~-- 14. TW15POR7ATION A. Idencify public strast• and highvay• morvinj the ai[s tod desctlDe proPosed aCCe" co the e:istiag •crsst sratw. Shorva •!ts pLos. 1t aar. --s- Gt CC l 3 C1'?? _ • i~ b. ls slt• currentlr ss rv*d br publie transic! Tf aot, Mhat the approx Lste diic we• co c M aurerc traait stap1 c. nov aany psrkinj space• rould ctw completeQ proyecc hawet fbv Msy vould ch+ projeet alid nace.' 11 d. Will the proposal npulr~ any wv rood• or •trNts, ar ispsorrssnt• eo esisciog rards or •crwt• aot 1ac1u41n= drirewysi If so, joosra117 dseriLe (indi ute wlrtlw r puelic of rivets). ~ 04'' ` • l/' e. Will the Oroject use (or oceur !n the leediate vitioicy ot) rcer, rail, or oit traosportation' if so, laowra21r deecribe. ~ 9 y~~ 1 J • . SPO~1.~~ r, ' IMY Z+ oMaDMAL Oi~Y'LA ~~y}~A~YG Y (WAG 197-11-960) Ssetion 11.I0.270{1} 3. i,tT9IRD!lfLWUI. L'LLl4!R!S {eootinwd} Crsluatioa Far 11$eaC7' ITs! Only f. Nav nany vwhicular tripa pec dar would be gontxitee b} the eaaplatad praSeet? If tnorn, lndlcare vhen puk Mou1d oceur. g. Proposed se uure■ to redues or taatrol transpdr ation Lspta, if aa7: 15. Pt1IS1IC SE.AY4CES a. 'Jauld the projec[ cesult ia an tACra+sw3 wad for pu911c •flwiCli ([ar esaspls, tire protrctlan, police prcrtec[iua, hea.lth tare. schoals, ather)T If ■o, genrrally drscriba. '~v C-) 5, Proposed asaaures to reduer or coatraY diract lapsets on yu6lic marvicss, i` aar: 16. tr-iL171e5 a. Ctrcle uillp,&11~fiurrepi~~"VW'tT,i4~1* at the sit~.-~elec[rlcii ~ ~urak gss ~acer rcfus• ■arvic , teYephon aan~tar~r ~av.~r; aeptic syseru, at'tur. - - - b. Deacribe the utilittea shas are Qf6pOsid far t!u ProjecL, EM ,.cilisr pravidfag the sonic• and ctu 4enera] conatruccioa activi[ira ao the att• or La tha iaradlete viz3ni[y vhlch aighE be nreded. c. siexeTuuxe i, Ehe underalgned, ivsar undar the penaXty af pRr]ury that tfa aEoa• rrspoc►ses ar• rrad• Cru[htuTly and to the 1x@t of ry knarledgr. i also underrtand rha[. ■*iould thare be aay vili#ul alarepres*otatlaa ur wlilfu.l lack ai [u11 dtaclarurr cn sy prrt, the agency ray withdraw any deeeraioution oi n9neignltLeanee rtuc Ls ni*hr laaw Ln reliaoc• upon chi■ chockllet. Da te : //i''u.y- Propetuent le (P1eade Priwc or ?yPe) Proponeat : Addra": t,rC 3-::;> S~ W4er1"A/7 rX (Signa r■) 9 Fhone: Persoe torplRting farm: 6rte; L ~~f Lr Phvne: - - POR SiAT! OSL OfiLX Staff aeabar(s) rs+rlswlag chacklir[: ~ Baned o chia scaff reviev of the envirarsment e4 e liat and otlti r p*rttoaac lniormatian, the taff: A. Cnncludes t!u t tlure are au probable ■igaifiraa[ ■drarse f,apacts tod recaaasodr r 3atermLiaacion oE aauslgnificacres. S. ConcZudss that proDablr sianiticant ad w rse enrfrvnwatal impacts do ■xist for the cnrrent proposal and reenamend■ a aitfgaced dec:r- minrrine oE noneLgalEieana• vith condicianr. C. Coacludea that thicre ars probable signifitaot advsrse rawirunimsa[al lapu es aod racrm=spda a dstesslaacion af •igniLftance. " T'XLI1fC M - V5. QO 10 . 1 . ' 1 . / 1 SCYA SUPPI.EMrNT C'~~~IJ (Traffic) ~q a" ~ The following is a comparison of traffic generation of the former Tire & Repair shop and the proposed Sales and Repair use. Previoiis Goodxear Tire and Auto Repair; According to the owner-operator of this facility, it had approximately 20-25 customers a day and 8 employees, Monday thru Saturday. Thus the average VTD was 56-66 VTD. Proposed C lobe Motors Auto Repair and Sales; Auto Repair: 22 VTD M-F. Employee's 5 emplovee~s (10 VTD) 3 mechanics come at 7, leave at 5 1 sec. comes at 8, leaves at noon 1 manager comes at 9 leaves at 6 Customers (12 VTD) 6 per day** (ingress, egress times differ based upon schedule and nature of repair. They never arrive all at once and leave all at fiabms: Salesman: 4 Salesman* (8 VTD) M-Sat. 1 comes at 7. leaves at 6 1 comes at 8, leaves at 6 2 come at 9, leave at 8. Customers: (20 VTD) plus test drives (10 VTD) 30 VTD Total M-Sat. The arrival and departure are spread out with no peak time. The combined total VTD is 22 VTD for repair and 38 VTD for sales, 60 VTD total. Weekend (Sat) VTD is reduced to Sales Only and approximately 38 VTD. In summary, the proposed use will have 60 VTl) and the former use 56-66 VTn. Thus, the uses are the same approximate volume but without peAk hour impacts. Therefore, it appears the use will not affect traffic at the PineslI-90 interchange. Note: The above figures are hased upon actual customer/emplnyee experiences of Goodyear Tire at this location and Globe Motors sales and repairs at their two present locations. 4 , OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONSL OF APPROVAL" DR-ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads 51, DATE: 07/18/96 PROJECT: B-1 & UR-22 TO B-3 Globe Motors FILE / (DRZE-202-96) Hearing/Review Date: Sponsor/Applicant: Dwight Hume Section Township Range: 15-25-44 Planner: Steve Davenport Design/Review Date: (July 18, 1996 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Desiqn Review Meeting Additional information is needed in order to prepare this proposal for a public hearing. A trip distribution needs to be accepted by the County Engineer prior to this item being placed on an agenda for public hearing. CC: Applicant Dwight Hume Engineer/Surveyor Ernest M Warner PAGE 1 • 12:46:46 01 JUL 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 03743 PINES RD (START) 00.000 40TH AV (START) & MA U 17 PAVED 40 PINES RD 00.140 38TH AVE U 17 PAVED 40 00.265 LORETTA DR (END) U 17 PAVED 40 00.421 34TH AVE (END) U 17 PAVED 40 00.510 32ND AV U 17 PAVED 40 00.650 LENORA DR (END) U 16 PAVED 40 00.730 SKYVIEW AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.790 27TH AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.810 27TH AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.880 26TH AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.950 25TH AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITIJM. 20 01.010 24TH AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.070 SOUTHWOOD LN U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.080 23RD AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.140 22ND AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.210 21ST AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.230 20TH AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.280 19TH AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.300 19TH AV (STAR.T) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.360 18TH AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.380 18TH AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.440 17TH AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 20 PINES RD (END) 01.550 16TH AVE 1 Records Processed I PAGE 1 ~ , 12:47:01 01 JUL 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 05116 VALLEYWAY (LIBERTY L 00.000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 PAVED 40 00.020 MCKINZIE DR (LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 00.080 GARRY DR (LIBERTY LA R 09 PAVED 40 00.270 MITCHELL CT (LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 00.290 MAIN AV (LIBERTY LAK R 09 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY (LIBERTY L 00.330 MITCHELL DR (LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY (LIBERTY L 00.390 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 01.280 LAKESIDE RD (LIBERTY R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05110 VALLEYWAY AV (START) 00.000 FANCHER RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV 00.160 LAKE RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 00.240 EASTERN RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 00.320 DYER RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 05111 VALLEYWAY AV (START) 00.000 PARK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY RV 00.230 ELLA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.360 DICK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.480 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.610 BESSIE RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.740 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.860 MARGUERITE RD U 17 PAVED 18 00.920 HUTCHINSON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 18 00.990 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 17 PAVED 40 01.050 MULLAN RD (ONE WAY N U 17 PAVED 20 01.120 WILLOW RD U 17 PAVED 20 01.240 LOCUST RD U 17 PAVED 20 01.380 FARR RD U 19 PAVED 14 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 01.500 EAST END OF ROAD 05112 VALLEYWAY AV (STAR.T) 00.000 WALNUT RD U 19 PAVED 20 VALLEYWAY AV 00.060 HER.ALD RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.190 FELTS RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.310 R.AYMOND RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.440 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20 00.500 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.690 PIERCE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.790 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 00.940 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 20 01.010 BATES RD (START) U 17 PAVED 30 01.190 UNION RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 01.440 SR 27 (PINES) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.840 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.950 MCDONALD RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 I 02.110 MCCABE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 02.200 BLAKE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 02.310 MAYHEW ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 02.360 NlAMER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 02.470 EVERGREEN RD 05113 VALLEYWAY AV (START) 00.000 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV 00.110 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.160 BANNEN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.170 BANNEN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.250 BEST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.260 BEST RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.300 REES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 00.500 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05114 VALLEYWAY AV (START) 00.000 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VA.LLEYWAY AV 00.120 BURNS RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.150 BURNS RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 PAGE 2 , 12:47:03 Ol JUL 1996 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00.250 PROGRESS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.390 SOMMER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.770 MOORE RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.000 CONKLIN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 01.500 FLOR.A RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 I 05115 VALLEYWAY AV (START) 00.000 HARMONY RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV 00.110 MCMILIlAN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 00.130 MCMILLAN CT (START) U 19 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV (END) 00.320 HODGES RD U 19 PAVED 40 7 Records Processed . l ' • A 0 DETERIVIIPIATIOIV OF 1VONSIGIVIFICAIVCE - "°1)11TS" SI'OKANE COUN'I'Y DIWSIOIot OF BiJII.DHNG AND PLAli1NI1VG RESP0NSIBI,E OFFICIAL, JAMES L. IVIANSON, DIREC'g'OIEt WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FIL.E NUIVBEIt(S) ZE-31-96 DESCRIPZ'IO1V OF PItOPOSAL Zone Reclassification from Neighborhood Business (13-1) and Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for automotive sales, repair and detailing APPLICAIVZ': Globe Motors c/o Dwight Hume 107 S Howard, Suite 325 Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 456-7402 I,OCATI0N OF PI20POSAL Generally located at the southeast corner of Valleyway and Pines Road (SR-27) in the SW '/4 of Section 15, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM I.EAD AGEIVCY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DET'ERMINA'TION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file wnth the lead agency This information is available to the public on request This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comreiengs regardflng this DNS must be sub$nitted no later than 4:00 p.m., September 16, 1996, if they are intended to alter the DNS. Al➢ comrnents should be sent to the contact person ➢isted below►. By Steve Davenport, AICP Title Planner II Phone (509) 456-2205 Address Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P) West 1026 Broadway Spok e, WA 99260 " I)A1'E ISSUIED 1996 SIG~1A''~J ~ . ~ OOI~~1ViEI~Tts REGARDIN ENVIRONMFNTAL OONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE HCARING APPEAI.OF THIS DE'I'ERMWA'I'ION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COCJNTY DIVISION OF BLTILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 2nd Floor, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal This DNS was mailed to 1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2 Spokane County Division of Engineenng, Pat Harper 3 Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red 4 Spokane County Health District, Steve Holderby 5 Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6 Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair, Wyn Birkenthal 7 Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley 8 Fire Protection District No 1 9 Central Valley School District No 356 10 Modern Electric Water Company 11 WA State Department of Transportation, Greg Figg 12 Spokane Regional Transportation Council x 4 { q y~ ti'nn 1 S P C3 K A N E w'~~~~ 'C CD LJ N T Y DEPARTAviENT C}F BUILDiNG AND PLANNING • A DIVISIDN OF THE PUBLIC WaRKS DEPARTMENT JAMFS L. MANSC7N, C.B.d.. DIRECTaR DENNIS M. SCoTI`, P.E., DIRECTQR MEMURANDUM TO: Pat Harper, Spakane CQUnty Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Division Qf CTtilities Steve Holderby, Spvkane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane Caunty Parks, Recreatian and Fair Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation C'rlen Miles, Spokane R.egivnal Transporta#ion Council Christine Fueston, Spvkane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Baard Central Valley Sehool District Modern Electric Water Company Fire District No. 1 FR+OM: John Pedersan, Senior Planner DATE: June 27, 1996 RE: Zone Reclassificatipn fram NeighborhQOd Business (B-1) and Urban Residential- 22 (UR-22) to RegianaI Business (B-3) . APPLICATi4N ACCEPTANCE ANI7 DESIGN REVIEW MEETIN+G Ji1LY 18.1996 AT I:15 P.1`VI. DYVISY(3N UF BUILDING AND PLAIVNING V.FLUUR CQNFERENCE RUCINI Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATIC3N ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FDRM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor annd representative have been invited ta alsa attend. If you c~n.n not attend, please fvrward yaur review comments an the attached farm tQ Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REV'IEw FORMS will be given to the spansor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks fve your covperation If yQU have any questians abaut the applicatian, please contact Steve I)►avenpor# of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205. c: Dwight Hume, 107 S. Howard Ste, 325, Spokane WA 99204 A. R. Mirghanbari, 2925 S. Mt. Vernon, Spokane WA 99223 AMGhments: Application Acceptance and Design Review F+arm, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WEST BROAC3WAY AVENUE • SPC]KAriiE, WA5H1NGTt?N 99260 BUILowc PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 PLAlvrr[zvc PHatvE: (509) 456-2205 • Fax: (509) 456-2243 Tnn• rc;nn) '194_11 f;A , Design Review for July 18, 1996 at 1:15 p.m. Zone Reclassification from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) Generally located at the southeast corner of Valleyway and Pines Road ~ (SR-27) in the SW of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Major Commercial and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) to Regional Business (B-3) for automotive sales, repair and detailing. PARCEL NUMBERS: 45153.2824, 45153.2825, AND 45153.2803 SITE SIZE: Approximately .94 acres APPLICANT: Globe Motors C/O Dwight Hume 107 S. Howard, Ste. 325 Spokane WA 99204 (509) 456-7402 OWNER: A. R. Mirghanbari 2925 S. Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA, 99223 (509) 535-6152 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Steve Davenport •e. 4 , S--?"`0KA.'N8''r1E COUN 7Y DIVISIO1'~ OF BUILDING AND FLANN-~NG ZONE RL1CLASSIFICATION I~~PLICL71TION PART I A. GEN9!.RAL 11rA` O1R1VHAY ION: NAME OFAPPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE GLQB MOTORS C/O Dwiqht J o Hume IVIAII.INGADDRESS Suite 325, S. 107 Howard Sbreet CITY Spokane STATE• Wa ° ZIP 9 9 2 0 4 PHONE. _J56- 7 4 02 (work) (home) IF APPLICANT ]GS r10T OWNER, INCI.UDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATIOIV FOR APPI,ICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NANIE A. R. M i rcih a nha r i PHONE 5 3 5- 61 5 2 MAILING ADDRESS S o 2925 Mt o Vernon CITY Spokane STATE Wa ZIP 9 9 2 2 3 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 4 0 8 4 0 s f (.94 a c o) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft) P10411~ ASSESStJR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 4 51 5 3. 2 8 2 4, 25, 03 , ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED S1'REET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N a 324 P i n e s Rd e EXISTIING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B-1 ; UR - 2 2( 7 8 & 68) EXISTIING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant (former Tire Store & Auto Repair PROPOSED ZONING B - 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Maior Commercial SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Val ley FIRE DISTRICT F e D o# 1 WATER PURVEYOR _.,N-sde= PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Smgle family dwelluigs Duplexes Multifamily dwelLngs Manufactured homes ( ) Business (N Industnal ( ) Mtxed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Descnbe LIST PREVIOUS PLA►NNING DEPARTMENT ACT'IONS IIWOLVING THIS PRlJPERTY B-1 146-78C & 18-68 ( ? ) ]B . LEGAILZDM RECLASSIFICATI~V IIVFOIt1VdATIONs LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SE Corner of Val ley Way & Pines SECTION 1 S TOWNSHIP 2 5 RANGE 4 4 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Va 11 e y Way & P i ne s WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTIING ON PUBLIC ROAD P i ne s( 2 3 2') Va 11 ey Way (18 7') . • , ZONE RECLASSIETCA 1 APPLICATION , Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROP4SAL HAVE ACCESS TC1 AN ARTERIAI.OR PLANNED ARTERIAL fX) YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS P i n e s & Va 11 ey Way LEGAL DESCRIPTZON OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSiFICATION PROPOSED (See Attached)` EXISTING ZONE(S) B-1 & UR - 2 2 TO PROPOSED ZONE(S) _ B- 3 FOR THE FOLLOWIING DESCRIBED PROPERTY (ATTACgi LEGAL DESCRIP'1zON STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW ~ (See Attached)/ IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT9 _ (Agent for Purchaser and Seller)/ WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL W D? (See Attached) WHAT IlVIPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? (See Attached) WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION7 (See Attached) WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IIVIPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE'? (See Attached) - ~ . . ZONE RECLASSIFICA v APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE TI-E PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT STAFF WITH VMTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIIVIINARY CONSULTA'ITON SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE 1VIAItSHALL/FIRE DISaRICT A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTEC'I'I N-HiS NO B ADEQUATE A,RRANGFNIENTS (HAVE) COU3MAM) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSItM AND FACILITIES FOR FIIZE PROTECTION PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW IAK OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT D , AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME D REQ S INCLUDE 1T ~/~D kAne- OoLl ~ Ft~x- 04.2t- FIRE DISTRICI' ~ SIGNA E DATE - - , WATER PURVEYOR A. SATTSFACTORY S FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQURREMEN'TS (HAVE (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/COMNfENTS r ~fh w6k-e4 rn 3 z ~ WATER DISTRICT IGNATURFIIZTLE ~ DATE COUIVTY ENGIIVEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAIlVAGE HAVB BEEN DISCUSSED WITH TFE APPLICANT A COMv1ENTS. ~ l7 G /n* 9"-,za~k.t 7f SIGNATURElI'ITLE DATE p - - - - - - - COIUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (Ht~VE) (HAVE N ) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS Il~b L~£ 2~ A coMMErrrs 2- ~ 2.~ ~ 6 a~ ~ ~ V 4/TSIGA A . . , B[EALTH IDI►STRIC7C A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMTI'TAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAV N07C) BEEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS Z jRGNAT7URElTITLE DATE . , SEV6/ER IPURVEYOit A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A COm]VIENTS AURLIC- t;D-EUZER- s" CJ ~ ~ SIGNA ATE . ZONE RECLASSIFICATI„.. APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART IIY SURVEYOR VERIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR THE ZONIlNG MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAI. DESCRIP'I'ION SIGNED , DATE ADDRESS , PHONE ZIP PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED. SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT TIiB ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTI-FiJLLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTI-ER SWEAR OR A►FFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR 1'HE PREVIOUSLY IDENT'IFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NO THE 4WNER,ATTACHED HEREWITH IS VV;RITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHOG MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. NAME DATE ADDR.ESS PHQNE ZIP ~ • , 2 I~'T R REPRESENTATNE - STATE OF WASHJNGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) r ~ SIGNED AND SWORN OR A►FFIRMED B ORE O THIS DAY OF , 1996, BY ' NOTARY SEAL ~ - Notary Pub c f tate of astun n Residing at My appointment expues ~ PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DNISION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING) DATE SUBMI= FILE # DATE ACCEP'TED. BY . TOTAL FEES RECEIP'T # • ' t TI_IPJ-0=; -1995 10 47 T-LI P. COEUR D' ALENE TI 1509456735? P 05 P ~ ZONE REC.ASSHWAMOId AFP9i.ICA71ON PaV4 vf 4 ~ ~ G ~ ► ~/,49 PART M ,t svbtNBYGR VglidE%CA7yW • ' F, , ` ZNDERNM= l11.KZNZD LAND 3ZTRV$YOR. HA'U8 C.'OMPLEW7M llNFORMATfON F41R TfrS ZONNC U+4P AND► 'WRi'd'%'8.*I LEG/►i. L ~ vi • 7 lw N! ~a 279 28 ~ ~ D~c' ~ ~.~c~ ~~►~,~,eg~_~~ .~~~c~~, ~o~~t,~~p ~ ~ ~ ~ .~F , ,s-~ J'~p ..~T~T~R~9, r ' t~ 7.t~` K { ~ AL L.AN ~ - oma, , - ~ EXPIRE5 PARTIV s, (SIItNAIt3R8OF lPROMTX OWhIM Oli UWM OF AUniOWATICM , 4 1M Ud'DMtRUNM SWEM Ox AM= WMM SNAI.'I'Y Q'F M.RgRYTSA7 M A8M MYCKYO ARE bBADB'8RI1MEtY A1M TO UM BT.b"TOP MY lNOWLSM IFURURR sVW GRAFFMK'iMT 1AM 7M OWM Q+F RWARn QFTBE AUA PAOP'QSBD FOR'T~ PREVIOUSI,X MMEM LANA t= AC'Tiatv:mW TO O~WY~TI~RR, A37' ` E~VtB'~t ~~J ~ FaOyi ~E Uw~g Acy'rJE~0~1~~tG 34C aCMM GN UMM 88HALF PiAM3.. _ PAT$ ADDRESS FHOW, ' ZE? ' . sMraAMa ~ 'tM ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ srarE oFWASoavcrTaPa aOVwfl'1C aP &'t'dKAm 3 ~ &IGNffi> AAtD SWt9&N (tR AFPDtb= T3.sS C~ OAY GF ,M5. BY . , 4 l+OY'A1RY sE►1. A A Nab97 ~ _ . Rowdia ns. My wautmeae mrpt+gs . _ , . ~ ~ . ~ v (°r088 CDMUZF3,D BcY '!gO QIV[StiQN OF BZ7Q,Mfi AND P'LAX'1YAtO) IIA7B 9MatMik. - MA 0. ~ 1?AIZACCEMM SY• ~ '['OTAL 8M t~ h J _ . R--EliONE L~PLliCAT8Oi`a SUPP8/EiOJtJC/~~ ~T ARE THE CHMGED CONDITIIONS OF TEKE AREA WffiCH YOiT FEEL MAKE TMS PROPOSAL W TED? The propertywas first zoned for a tire store and auto repair in 1978, (146-78C) and since then tlze following conditions have changed 1} The adoption of the Comprehensive Plan supports IVlajor Commercial use 2) The area has experlenced implementation of this Commercial category and a new commercial use has been approved across Pines from the subject property , NE of the property and North of the property. The area is clearly in transifiion to Commercial uses 3) The portion zoned UR-22 was once zoned RO in 1968 and for office uses The adjacent building in the same zone change has been vacant for some time and has relocated WHAT IMPACT WE.L THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE HAiTE ON THE ADJACEN'T PROPERTIES'P The proposeci use wlll have minimal impact for the following reasons 1) The use is nearly identical to the previous use recently vacated from the property That is, the previous use was a Goodyear Tire Store and automotive repair facility This use will use the same structure for automotive repair and detailitig as well as a showroom for quality used car sales The balance of the property will be used as a sales lot 2) The gerformance requirements of the B-3 zone will further assure land use compatibility 3) The adjacent progerties are vacant and / or accessory parking and are not residential uses The exception being a rental across Valley Way flanked by the previous tire store and now a new drive-m restaurant on its north border WHAT FAC'II'ORS S[JPPORT THE PROPOSEIl) REZONE? 1} The Comprehensive Plan designates this site for Major Commercial use and the B-3 zone implements that category 2) The following applicable goals objectives and decision guidelines apply: Goa16 1, Obiective 6 l.a Commercial development should be buffered to protect adjacent areas- Comment: The site is orlented towards the arterials and screening pursuant to the B-3 zone is being implemented Thus, Decision Guideline 6 1 1 is being inaplemented per site plan of record Objective 6 1 b Sufficient land is provided for off-street parking Decision Guideline 6.1.4 is being implemented as there are adequate on- site areas for storm drainage control, sewer and water service are public utilities. Obiective 6 1 e Encourage multiple use centers , . (C."omment.• The purchaser is Globe Motors which presently works froffi two separate sites for auto repair and sales This will combirie the two uses at one site. To that end, Objective 6.1 f is implemented as well as we are clusterlxig commercial uses which are oriented to the regional market Thus, Decision Guidelines 6 1.6, and 6.1 8 are being implemented ~T MEASZJRES II)O YOU PROPOSE TO WR'I`gGATE YOUt PROPOSAL'S IIMIPACT OI~ ~URROUNDI@TG LAND USE? 1) As per the site plan of record, the improvements are oriented to the arterials and the site wlll have fencirig anct landscaping improvements heretofore not provided for the prevlous siniilar use 2) And as ger above the site wlll ianplement both the applicable goals, objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Zone Code. 3) Finally, the surrounding aarea is n transition to other commercial uses or is vacant and accessory uses to offlce uses on adjacent properties 45G?3s? r 1,509 T~ GO~~~ aLEr~E jo" w w 7-19,3e, 10 JUry ~ . m ~ .v.t : ~ ~ osP • ~ A ~ ~ ~ ! 6t ~ 19 l• t~ a $9 . ~ ~ ~ ~ 0►.00-0 ~ ~C\lip ) ° ~ ~ ~ pe a 1 . ~ ~ 000....~'r~"'+' 4r A fA , ~ • ~ i ~ 9 't a'~ 6 ~ ► ~ . . ~ ~ ' . - ! ~ ~ , 1 • 6 7 t1,t ~ , ~ ► ~ . ~ r q i f ~ f ~ ~ J' ~ eg ~ ~ ~ ► c~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .~~~5 t ti•~ 1, ~ ~ r, ~ . •ib ~ . 4 , ~ _i 1 / ' ` ~ s~- ~ V10 v ` ' v b ~0 d r • . _ l ~ ~ ~ , , . ~ --~,".P. - e ~ t eb ~ ~ • * { ~ ~ sJi itA-2?-1996 1 0 47 F J-U-B COEiJR D'ALENE Tr_ 15094567357 F 06 , > i~ CLIENT. Dwight Hume , ~ I)ESCRIPTION. Part of Tract 124 of Opporturuty t DATE June 7, 1996 ~k , , ~ ~ ~ t ~ Part of Tract 124 of Opportunity, Spokane County, Washington, descnbed as begisvung at a poinY on the West line of said Tract 124, which point is 42 2l3 feet Noxth of the Southwest comer of the North haif af said Tract 1245 thence Narth along the VVest line of said Tract 124 a distance ~ of 127 feet, thence East para11e1 with the Iine dividing the North and South halves of said Tract 124 a dis4ance of 276.96 feet, more or less, to a point 376.85 feet West of the East line of sa,id Tract 124 as measwred on a line n,uining parallel with the North line of said tract 124; thence Soutb paxallel with the East line of Tract 124 a distance of 127 feet, thence West to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the South 56 feet thereof; , AND EXCEPT the East 124 5 feer thereof TOGETHER VVITH the West 186 9 feet of the North half of Tract 124 of Opporhuuty, EXCEPT , the Soutb 169 2/3 feet and EXCEPT the N'orih 104 63 feet, as per plat thereof recarded in Votume "K" of Plats, page 20; EXCEPT portions deeded to the State of Washington for SR 27 im Deed recorded under Recording No. B405110159 AND TOGE7HER WITH the North 104.63 feet of the West 186 9 feet of the Norfh half of Tract 124, Opporturuty, according to plat recorded in Volume "K' of Plats, Page 20, in Spokane County, Washtngton EXCEPT any portion lying within the rights-of-way of Pines Road and Valley Way ~ • oF WASJr ~ . ~r y ~ 1 ° '`2712$ ~s 7n~ expiAES , a z~ • • b . ; ~ P a + SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF 3U--LDING AND PLANNING ~~~E RECJ{..dASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAR8 1l A. GENERAI, IN'FORIVgATYO1V: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE GLOBF MOTORS C/ O Dwiqht J. Hume MAII.ING ADDRESS Suite 325, S e 107 Howard Sbreet CITY Spokane STATE wa ' ZIp 9 9 2 0 4 PHONE 456- 7 4 0 2 (work) (home) IF APPI.ICANT IS NOT OVVIVER, INCLUDE WRITT'Er1 OWNEIt AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICAIVT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME A,]R, M-,r cjh a n harj PHONE 5 3 5- 61 5 2 MAII.ING ADDRESS S. 2925 Mt. Vernon CITY Spokane STATE Wa ZIp 99223 PROJECT/PROPOSAL STTE AREA (acres or sq ft) 4 0 8 4 0 s f (.94 a c e) ADIACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROP4SAL 4 51 5 3. 2 8 2 4, 25, 03 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED UOXLP STREET ADDRESS OF PROP4SAL N. 324 P i n e s Rd. EXISTlNG ZONE CLASSIFICAT'ION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) B-1 ; UR - 2 2( 7 8 & 68) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant (former Tire Store & Auto Repair PROPOSED ZONING B - 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY M a io r C o mm e r c i a 1 SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley FIRE DISTRICT F.D.# 1 WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Single faauly dwelhngs Duplexes Multifanuly dwellings Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( Industrial ( ) Mtxed Use ( } Other ( ) - Descnbe , LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IlWOLVING THIS PROPERTY B-1 1 46-78C & 18-68 ( ? ) B. I,EGAL/ZQ1VE RECLASSIFICATION gNFQRIVIA'TI()N: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SE Corner of Valley Way & Pines SECTION TOWNSHIP 2 5 RANGE 4 4 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Valley Way & Pines WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD P i ne s( 2 3 2') Va 11 ey Way (18 7') , r • ~ ' . b . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES 1'HE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL tX) YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS P i ne s& Va 11 ev Wav LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED (See Attached) EXISTIIVG ZONE(S) B- 1 & UR - 2 2 TO PROFOSED ZONE(S) _ B- 3 FOR THE FOLLOWIING DESCRIBED ~ 1 PROPERTY (ATTACI•I LEGAL DESCRTPTTON STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW (See Attached) IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _ (Agent for Purchaser and Seller) WHAT ARE THE CHANGEI7 CONDI'I'IONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL W D? (See Attached) WHAT IIvIPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? (See Attached) WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? (See Attached) WHAT MEASURES DO Y(JU PROPOSE TO UlITIG 41'E YOUR PROnOSAL'S IMPAC'Y' ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? (See Attached) , , h - • o . ZC1NE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATI4N Page 3 of 4 P.A,RT II THIS SECTTON OF THE APPLICA'I°ION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPART.MENT STAFF WITH WRIT'T'EN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD FRELIlvENARY CQNSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF T'HE PREL5IINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL T(J THE PLANNING DEPARTNIENT - - FIRE NiARSHALY./FIRE I)yS'T]EtICT - - A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTT NO B ADEQUATE ARRA,NGEMENTS (HA►VE) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYS M AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPQSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW (A`l , QR iJTIABLE T4 CALCULAT'E NOW BECAUSE USE IS N{)T DEFTNITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERYviIT APPLICATION TIME D R:EQUIItEMENTS INCLUDE f `t" _ t~ `t t '~'f't~ ~rU-~`~i~►-~,,, ✓ FIRE DISTRIC'T' SIGNA E DATE - - WATER PURVIEYOR A. SATISFACTORY S F4R DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQU2RENiF..,NTS (~iA~V~ (HA'4'E NOT) BEEP3 TVIADE B uEQ • sicoMMErrrs - "YKIE~~lk. 04c~~e~c t ~ r\ ~ ~ ' • ~ z ~ ~VVATER DISTRICT IGNATUREfTTTLE DATE - - - - COiJtVTY ENGIri1EER A PRELIMINARY DISCLTSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAI. REQUIREMENTS F(JR R4ADS AND DRA.INAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT' A C{)MMEIVTS ~ ( SIGNA y E DATE - - - - - - - COUNTY iJTILI'TIES A PRELIMIINARY DISCUSSI4N HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIRENiENTS FOR SUBMITTAL UF THIS PROPOSAL (FIAVE) (HAVE 1VCDT) BEEN SATISFLED THE 17ESiGNA'T'ED WATER PURVEYDR FQR THIS SITE jS A COMMENTS _ SIGNATC7RErI'ITLE _ DAT'E , HEALTH x?ISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSI4N HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENER.AL REQUIREMENTS F4R SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. A CaMMENT'S •/,i.2~~,~'~ ~ ~.l-~ . v ~ y z AGRTA E DATE - - - - - - - r - - - - SEWER PURVEYOR - - , 5 A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIaN HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISI4N OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS _ SIGNATUREJTITI.E DATE . • • l o • ` ~ ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART gII SURVEYOR VERIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR THE ZONIIVG MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION SIGNED , DATE ADDRESS PHONE ZIP PART gV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTTRED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NO THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS VVRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORG MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF NAME DATE ADDRESS PHONE ZIP . k6' r _ . &h~~, 1& 4APP 2-6 SIGNATCTRE N T R REPRESENTATNE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE ) r ~ SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFUUNvIED B ORE O THIS C>? DAY OF 1996, BY / ~ a ~ NOTARY SEAL Notary Pub T f Ilate of aslun n _ Residing at - - My appointment expues '-7^" PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUII.,DING AND PLANNING) , DATE SUBMITTED FII.E # DATE ACCEPT'ED BY TOTAL FEES RECEIPT # .r RECEIPT SUMMARY TRANSACTION NjJNIBER- T9601115 DATE. 07/01/96 APPLICANT: A. R. MIRGHANBARI PHONE= 509 535 6152 ADDRESS: 2925 S MT VERNON SPOKANE WA 992 23 ~ CONTACT NAME A R MIRGHANBARI PHONE= 509 535 6152 TRANSACTION: ZONE CHANGE (ENGS), LAND USE ACTION REVIEW • DOCUMENT ID. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) CONIIKENTS : CHECK FROM ROBERT ANZNINO PARCEL NOS.45153.2803, 2829, 2825 FEE & PAYMENT SUMMAFtY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT ZONING PERMIT 1 200 00 LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20 00 TOTAL DUE = 220 00 TOTAL PAID= 220.00 BALAIJCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 07/01/96 00006089 7037 220 00 PROCESSED BY• WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY WENDEL, GLORIA THANK YOU ~ ~ 1 ~ PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT Date Number J Name Phone Address v Comments ci& 173-~(~a01 l~Fj ~ a~6 -q- CUSTOIV~ER ROLTI'ING 3~O+r ~7 `15y5153-28,24) ZS) 03 Drvision of Buildtng dt Ptannm~ Dmsion of Huildinq dt Ptenning "a 2'5 Z ♦ ^ {vr r h ytl\ lj X,M1 ~(•J y {`{C L ♦ % r } r r ti ti {S ~ r r'v~ Jti r r ~r riy~ ~,~Jf~ .Q~ • ~w~`( w }'•~}+,.~,',v ~N ~ ry ` { 3} 7. ti' ~~FJ371./~7K♦ti Q~4~iFllR ~ ~~~iWifiOVM~' t ~titi 4CYKti+} ~<y}{ ~S'.tt'i~~~il~~~ 1 1YYWFlAddressuig ~ Admm Excepbon ~ Approach Pertnit Bwidmg Permit Arteteal Rd Plan Info ~ Flood Plaun Permit F]Code InformaUon Elffinding Site Plan Info ElPtibitc/Private Raads ~ Commercial Review ~ Cert of Exempbon ~ Res Bldg Permd Rev Conference Comprehensrve Plan Sde Drainage Info F]Energy Code Info ~ Cond Use Petmit ~ Subdrvision Review FIFue Safety Rewew ~ Nonconforming Use ~ Uality Peimit ~ Manufactured Home ~ Permit Review _ Chsnge Renew 4 ~4&ne ~ Mechaiucal Perm~ts ~ Shorelmes Info ~ ; - ~ b ~G(3 ~ Other Permits ~ Short Plat Info ~ NO FEEREQUIRED Remewcr 1"une out _ Plumbmg Pcrmits _ Subdrvision Info ~ ~0 , F]Pnvate Road Info ~ Temp Use Pemut FIResidential Review ~ Vanance Appl ~ APA Payment F]Sewer Permits ~ Zone Check ~ CeR of Exemphon Flinfmmahon ~'Zoiee Info E] Subdinsion Rewew LJLID/Sewer Info ~ - ~ ~Zone Chenge Review y lt - O ..Lr , ~ NO FEEREQUIRED ~ 1V0 FEEREQUIRED Reviewer Tune out Reviewer Tune out Revtewer Tune out IO.stS- Am PlASMPA3SPORi CIR 7J16196 • t ~j ~ I%A`SS,Q {'a4 ~ • ~ ~A AxW¢ ` ~ i ~ T o 5~ 1 ~ ,gIla'tO oo ~ Ut r AT ~L ~ ~1 rjA~T it % o Q ~ ' v , ' St A a-Rt . . • • ~ K ~ A~ t . ' ~ ~ ~,~~,t 3p ~ b - V • • fvt A' •`r~• • • • t. y8 ~ ` ~►L~ ~ $ r - • . . y~/ . v~`s • ~ Y y .a ~ ~ 7 Ct ~ • p~ • ~ ` ~ • • ' ci , fFlCE: , ~ ~ 1'A Av p ~ t9 ' ~ 1 4 T~ ~ Y ~ ~ , • ~ i ` ~ ~ pVp-iN m 6~ tp Av~ ~ ct ~ 0 ~ ~ . . g ~ - ~ ~r►~ _ EL 2 014 a ' ~ ~ . --s--- ~ . t • ° ~ ~~4 A~~ ~ ~ 1 T O ~ M ,g~NYO y 4 . ~ ~ ~e►d ~ ~ ' ~--'T ~ aT. ~X ~ • • ~Q~~? ~"de°t'~~ ' . o,~'R~. t D~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ 0 cc - m oJ eu ~Iq Tr A+-°~i r c' ~ ' ~ p'd ~ •e ~ ~`~'ta1; t•~:• ! ~e~ ~a~•••~~" y ~ 0 ~ A~ ~ • ~ i~ . • ~ • • = ' wa d AL~ ~ lIva ~ a+ • . ~ ~,~~~~li~ o~ ~ 64 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ . ` ~ IFf'! ~ ~~w~ ~ ~ ~ Ad r ~~~,.1~~~ ~ - y~.• ~ ~ ~ Q ~ . ~ - • . ,w b ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 - a aa , ti ovR~~ oc A ~ • v t~. ~ ~y A d~ ~ , _ ~ _ g • 7► . ~ ~ ~ ~ • 20A ~ AV2 ~ ~ GHTN F''Y-. ~ ~ s . r►.:•` ~ ~ . . - - r) , , . _ . . _ _ i . I t t~ ~ T~~ o I 9 r i a T i w o f ' n REZONE ~ I I ' l. K~ M~. I L11~ .J / • 11 , I ~ - Z O M I N i I =ON INO r ROM 6-I } UR ZZ I TO 6•~ ~ - - I CarNW4 ~.6! wro ao/y4 a ww► y.O ~ V h `I-s y WfIY G Ir inlM 8 40 610 ' 61ffr /oNLY ~w• ~«w•.. ~ ~ua.ow ww 4 ~~o u ~ e e PMCS.rt Mo~w c e. I I Y. ~"e ~ eo ~ i 1 hu«n .n~ ar~ ~ 6 aN 0 a ~ aua I►I~ \ L~~ w!os ewew w Y.N fw►M OAD or . T r u r • ~r~I1Up I I I+ I" I 1 , r n+..~r nrmeaso m C w~ w0 /~M MIw w~W d vaca i ~ .v.. ~Nn.u ,6m ;014 or Mm I I 4f1 I LW 40 1.4 7 p~ i LOM Y• Ady C t .f l,. E wwn. N~ .w CLfava O~.nwr Vw a o ) 4NOWaooM .In n J~ all If toeH ~4~7 a MW H I 1; j~' 1 ~NF/ wR I~1 ~ ~ ~ GC~ a M M.r. a1M OVfOIOIt 0~ ~ OMMGL ~ y aarw OL~ 0• i{ T~ yy ~ f~4Nr0 rkp+~0o0 1L 11At0i , (i~ r.ao.) al~w~ J ~ i W a 1 ~ t D M t► ~ y 6 Mrf / •A f h 1~ ...r /n~ot1 hfoN000 ~ 1 H h ~ W ~~wrrw.~we ~ ~ s~.ur o ww ~ O wr ~ ~ "6 wr► ara«~r . qa.N yl ~ uu~o ..w ew!_ ~ Il N r ~ ~ ~vrooo~c ' J , i O I f ~ I, A Y I ~ v~ I Er15Ta y4 , VM~ A 0.r♦ ` •..o ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ •n ~ t . J . ~ w~ 3 ~ a~ r.+♦ I ` s r M 1 ~ ~ ~ \ 4h~ ~ A14~+GNrt I ~ .L • . TvY~If T ~wwr ifL p ~ w ~ £wiR ~ ( k I e tv+ VIO-460-10 creaat :Aw.+t w^ oow I ♦ta 7.ot a ru • I) ~o'wc~rt O o ~ : SITE PLAN NORTH " ♦ ~~j~ op ` %//lA.f 6 i4►~ sr 7(!QD z I ~riiqe. ' y.~~ MAw ~wAw1 ~ I I I .nL.a 5v w reo • 'I ; . VICINITY MAP SP- I w~f w IrV . . . _ _ . . . _ . , _"".l v_ w ..m_~. ..,,..w m . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 1:.: ~„8. p y. .am' 'mow... d 2 F ,.a. ✓S' Y X ~ . .d w.. x 5' { S., S.~ c„ ~ x 4 k 1 . ~ r~ ~ ~ ° gym. w~ w a a ^ d s ..,d: 8 a r a , P p t ~ ,m ~ w. g t s ~ W. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ G a ~ s' . ~G ~ 7~u ~ a ~ ~ i ~ M F r R ' ~ i k ~~r r, S o s~~ r. .Ba: ~.4: , .a, .s-, a asp ,.a,~'-;7x ~ ~ ~ ~ w a s xi ~~6~. S ~ ~ „y ~ a ~ g1IR 9 tl ~ r ~ r~ R...,~. s..ry a.. i 'R:" ~ G ~ ~~~s~ „?a F m° a,~, a+ , s , .~..m , ,~n J~ ~ r „a < , %r a~ 'vr~rj ~.w , U'^' tea,' a; ry~ r« A' y'~', f:. ~J ..Hh n' 'tk: k ip. j~ . R',. ;k». ~1 .G Kt G ~ y t. 4;. C f.. S ~K. x ~,Ik.. .,F. ,4~ k:'. 4. S. :f f A t : :F ti: l yy', 3 ;r~..: : 'fit,: t T!. ,,y.. ~ " " M rE# s r . " ,~r~ LV t. YLi, x w x.:r - " ~N; ~ art .y°, n is ",w: . y''Ay w %x.,... I ice"" ~7.J,, r; . gar. " .r " axe „„t'. 4r x.. T a n "w .5 w ""K'"" mg'.y. r; a. Pr"n , .4w x~ "a, P~++ i . .