ZE-023-96 0
.
weo sPOxANE covNTY xEaRIN~ EXAMItvER
2~ 4199 .
RE Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5)
(LJR-3 5) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zones )
to Regional Business (B-3) Zone with a Vanance ) FINI)INGS OF FACT,
From Artenal Frontage Requirements ) CONCLiJSIONS, ANI)
Applicant Alfred Leichner ) I)ECISION
File No ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 )
I. SLTMIVYARY OF PROPOSAL ANID DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassificahon from the Urban Residential-3 5(LTR-3 5)
and Neighborhood Business (B-1) zones to the Regional Business (B-3) zone, for an automobile
detailing business and those uses aIlowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone, with an
application for a vanance froin the artenal frontage requirement of Section 14 628 315 of the
Spokane County Zorung Code
Decision: Derual of both apphcations
II. FIlVIDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Heanng Exammer has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions
A. GENERAL INFOIt1V1ATI0iv:
Applicant Alfred Leichner, 11207 East 9" Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206
Address: 12929 East Riverside, Spokane, WA
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Riverside Avenue approximately 350
feet west of the intersection af Riverside Avenue and McDonald Road, in the SW '/4 of Section
15, Townstup 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Legal Description: Lot 13 of Evans Addihon to Spokane County, as per plat thereof recorded
in Volume 3 of Plats, page 47, together with that portion of the north half of vacated Riverside
Avenue lying south of and adjouung satd Lot 13 and lying west of the east line of Lot 7 extended
across said Avenue
Zoning: Urban Residenhal-3 5(UR-3 5) and Neighborhood Business (B-1)
Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated in the Major Commercial
category of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan The property is also witlun
the Aquifer Sensitive Area, Pnonty Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by
the Comprehensive Plan
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 1
/
Environtxiental Review: A Determination of Nonsigruficance was issued by the Division of
Building and Planning on July 12, 1996
Site I)escription: The site is approximately 13,659 square feet in size, nearly level, and is
improved with an automobile detailing business The existing bullding on the site occupies
about 17 % of the property The business is the subject of a zonulg complaint, because the
current use of the site is not allowed under existing zorung The site is zoned Neighborhood
Business (B-1), except for the north 35 feet of the property, wluch is zoned Urban
Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5)
Surrotending Conditions: The property is located adjacent to the cul-de-sac of Riverside
Avenue, which is an un-maintauied County road designated as a Local Access Street by the
Spokane County Artenal Road Plan Riverside Avenue intersects McDonald Road northeast of
the site, and McDonald Road intersects Spra.gue Avenue southeast of the site The Artenal Road
Plan designates McDonald Road as a Niinor Artenal, and Sprague Avenue as a Pnncipal Artenal
Single-family residences are located north of the site, a restaurant and parkuig lot are located
south of the site, the parking lot for the restaurant is located west of the site, and an insurance
sales office is located east of the site The site is bordered on the south, east and west by B-1
zoning, except that the land lying west and south of the southwest tip of the site is zoned B-3,
_ and the land lying east and west of the northerly 35 feet of the site is zoned UR-3 5 The land
north of the site is also zoned UR-3 5 The Sprague Avenue comdor in the area is domuiated by
commercial uses and commercial zoning On July 24, 1996, the Heanng Examiner approved a
- rezone for a 1 53 acre parcel located 180 feet west of the site, from the B-1 and Urban
Residential-22 (LJR-22) zone to the UR-22 zone, for development of 21 multi-farruly residences
See Building and Planrung File No ZE-14-96
Project Description: The applicant seeks to rezone the site to the B-3 zone to make the existing
automobile detail business lawful under the Zoning Code The vanance is needed to comply
with the development standards of the B-3 zone The site plan illustrates only four parking
spaces, while Zoning Code 14 802 040 (31) requires a muumum of 12 spaces based on the gross
square feet of the existmg business The site plan also fails to illustrate requued landscaping
along the north and south property lines The applicant would be requued to improve the
frontage of the site with Rlverside Avenue, and to pave the unpaved portions of Riverside
Avenue from the site to McDonald Avenue, all through a future road improvement distnct or
County road project County Englneenng would allow the applicant to utilize a pnvate road
within the public nght of way of Riverside Avenue for access The project would be required to
connect to pubhc sewer
Procedural Matter: The Heanng Examiner orally denled the proposal at the conclusion of
the public heanng, subject to the entry of formal wntten findings and decision The Examiner
prepared a wntten decision on December 16, 1996 Due to a miscommurucation, which went
undiscovered until recently, the Examiner's decision was not issued in December, 1996
B. PIZOCEDIJRAL gNFORMAT'ION:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Zoning Code Chapter 14 402 and 14 628
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 2
r
Hearing Date and Location: August 7, 1996, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA
1Votices: Mailed July 15, 1996 by apphcant
Posted August 1, 1996 by applicant
Published July 19, 1996
Compliance The legal requuements for public notice have been met
Site Visit: August 5, 1996
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos 96-0171 (Heanng Exanuner Ordinance) and
96-0294 (Heanrig Exammer Rules of Procedure)
Testimony:
Louis Webster Alfred Leichner
Division of Building and Planiung 11207 East 9" Avenue
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99206
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Marc Roecks James Wedemeyer
12340 East Valleyway 105 North McDonald Road
Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99216
Penny Johnston Martha Faraca
3812 South Ridgeview 12807 East Sprague, Apt 6
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99216
Terry Lantorman
15008 East 21 S` Avenue
Veradale, WA 99036
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zorung Code,
Spokane County Code, Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0294 Also Heanng Examiner final
decision in Building and Planning Division No ZE-14-96, and Building and Planning File CV-
43-92 C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS:
In considenng a rezone application, Washngton case law generally provides that 1) there is
no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare Parkndize v
Seattle, 98 Wn 2d 454, 462 (1978), Biarnson v Kitsao Countv, 78 Wn App 840 (1995)
Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14 402 (1)(2) indicates that consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, detnment to the public welfare and changed circumstances are relevant
when considenng amendments to the Spokane County Zoning Map The proposed rezone must
also be consistent with the Spokane County Zorung Code, the State Environmental Policy Act,
the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations
Conditions may be imposed to assure the consistency of the proposal with applicable regulations
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 3
4
The following findings of fact and conclusions are made
1 The nronosal does not izenerally conform with the Spokane County Generalized
Comnrehensive Plan
a Relevance of Comnrehensive Plan
The Heanng Examiner is required to set forth in findings and conclusions the manner in
which a land use decision cames out and conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and other
development regulations See RCW 36 70 970 (3), and Spokane County Resolution No 96-
0171, Attachment "A", Section 11 A comprehensive plan serves as a guide to the adoption of
zoning regulations and other official controls In rezone matters, only general conformance with
the comprehensive plan is required See RCW 36 70 340, Bame v Kitsap Countv, 93 Wn 2d
843, 848-49 (1980), Bassani v Countv Commissioners, 70 Wn App 389, and Cathcart v
Snohomish Countv, 96 Wn 2d 201, 211-12 (1981) A comprehensive plan provides guidance to
the heanng body in making a rezone decision Belcher v Kitsan Countv, 60 Wn App 949, 953
(1991) Conformance with a comprehensive plan is relevant in determirung whether a rezone
bears a substantial relationshlp to the public welfare Bassani, §Upra, at 396-98 Spokane County
Zoning Code 14 100 104 states that the provisions of the Zorung Code shall be interpreted so as _
to carry out and unplement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the general
plans for physical development adopted by the Board of County Commissioners The
Comprehensive Plan indicates that it should be used as a reference source and guide for malang -
land use decisions The "decision guidelines" set forth in the text of the Plan are to be used in
determuung whether or not a particular proposal should be approved, condihoned or derued
See Comprehensive Plan, p 2
b Annlicable nolicies
The site is designated within the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan
The Major Commercial category is intended to provlde the opportunity for development of
commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses
directly related to major throughways Major Commercial areas typically require a full line of
public services and utilihes, including public sewer Most commercial development will be on
relatively flat land and buildings will be of a low profile Highway and artenal stnp commercial
areas in such category will usually be made up of businesses on mdividual parcels clustered
along a heavily traveled street or highway, each providing off-street parkuig Typical businesses
found along a stnp often include new and used car sales, fast-food establishments, bars and
fruit/produce stands Most single-family residential areas would not be considered compatible
witlun the Major Commercial category, unless proper screerung and performance are established
See Comprehensive Plan, Section 6, "Purpose" and "Detailed Defiruhon"
Goa16 1 of the Major Commercial category promotes development of commercial land "
in a manner wluch is complementary and compatible with adjacent land uses and the surrounding
environment " ObJective 6 1 a states that commercial developments should be buffered to
protect adjacent areas Decision Guldeline 6 1 1 indicates that the best means of encouraging
compatibility between commercial uses and adjacent land-use categones is to onent project
improvements to maintain or improve upon the aesthetics of the areas affected by the proposal,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96NE-7-96 Page 4
r
provide buffenng needs, and provide landscaping needs Decision Guideline 6 12 indicates that
buffenng or spatial separation between proposed and existing uses should be requued if the
proposal's physical charactenstics is objectionable to future development on adjacent lands
`Buffenng" is defined in the Comprehensive Plan glossary as a" technique of separating
incompatible land uses by distance, changing density, landscaping, screening and/or physical
features or structures " Appropnately buffered multi-family residential development compatible
with existing and potential commercial activities may be used as a transition between lugh-
intensity commercial uses and lower intensity residential uses Decision Guideline 6 1 8 Light
industry in some instances may also provide a buffer between intensive commercial uses and
residential neighborhoods See Decision Guidehne 6 1 10
Objective 6 1 i of the Major Commercial category encourages business distncts in scale
with the needs of the populahon throughout the county Small-scale convenience stores and
commercial enterpnses may be considered adjacent to residential neighborhoods Decision
Guideline 6 1 13 states that stores and commercial sernces established to serve residents within a
few blocks' radius may be considered compatible, and therefore appropnate, when they are
adjacent to residenrial land use categones See Objecbve 6 1 j and Decision Guideline 6 1 13
Decision Guideline 6 13 of the Major Commercial category states that provisions should be
made for aesthetic quality of physical development along nghts of way for county artenals
witlun the Urban Impact Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan Objective 6 1 d
encourages adequate circulation patterns in commercial areas, and planned access to public
transit Objective 6 1 c indicates that developers should be required to provide sufficient land for
- off-street parlcing at commercial sites Decision Guideline 6 16 states that before commercial
development proposals are approved, it should be determined that the proposal has adequate on-
site areas for existing and potentlal paricing and stormwater control, that the impact of the
development upon existing or planned transportation facihties has been considered, and that the
proposal considers access to existing and planned public transit facilities and routes
The clustenng of uses, when it mcreases the cost-effectiveness of utilities and/or
transportation, is the preferred commercial development pattern in the Major Commercial
category Decision Guideline 6 19 Decision Guidelme 6 17 states that that multiple-use
clustenng proposals complementary to existing and/or proposed commercial development should
be positively considered when they share physical facilities such as ingress and egress,
landscaping and provide cooperative ameruties The Major Commercial category contemplates
the clustenng of artenal stnp corrunercial uses along the artenal, not belund one another without
any shared physical facilities or features Major commercial development should be consistent
with County policies and regulations pertaining to water, sewer, storm water drainage and
transportation See Decision Guidelines 6 1 5 and 6 16
The site is currently zoned Neighborhood Business (B-1), except for the northerly 35 feet
of the site, wluch is zoned Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) The purpose of the B-1 zone is to
allow for limited, small-scale neighborhood serving retail and office uses as a means of
implementing the Major Commercial, Urban and Suburban categones of the Comprehensive
Plan by providing local facilities to serve the everyday needs of the surrounding neighborhood
Withui the Major Commercial category, the B-1 zone is also ultended to provide land use
transition between the Major Commercial category and less mtense land use categones of the
Comprehensive Plan The uses in the B-1 zone are generally less intense than those of the other
business zones, with development standards directed at ensunng land use compahbility and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 5
S
aesthetics Such zones are encouraged wlthin and on the fnnges of a Major Commercial
category, with site access required along a public road of the Collector Artenal designation or
greater See Zoning Code 14 624 100, 14 624 315
The purpose of the UR-3 5 zone, which zone applies to the northerly 35 feet of the site and
the land adjacent to such portion of the site as well as the land south of the site, is to implement
the lower density range of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The intent of the zone
is to promote areas of pnmanly single-family residential use in an urbanized setting, served by a
high level of public services See Zoning Code 14 616 100
The applicant proposes to rezone the site to the Regional Business (B-3) zone, for the
pnmary purpose of continuing to operate the automobile detailing business that is illegally
operating on the site under existing zorung The purpose and tntent of the B-3 zone is stated in
Zorung Code 14 628 100, as follows
The purpose of the B-3 zone is to provide for the location of a wide
range of retail arnd service activitres Thrs zone wall implement the
Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan The uses
wzthin thas zone may often require large areas for customer parlnng,
retail service, some outside activities, display and other commercial
activities The businesses locatrng within these areas often draw
customers from the county at large and other outlying areas rather
than from a more limcted trade area Further, it rs the intent of this
section to imDlement comprehensive plan polrcres whtch encouraQe
commerctal develoDment along Principal Arterials or hiQhwavs and
estabhsh regaonal-servcnQ commercial areas General characteristics
of these areas rnclude paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and
water, and a full line of public service including manned fire
protectron and publcc transit accessibrlity
[Emphasis added] The B-3 zone is the most intensive business zone provided for in the Zonulg
Code, and requires frontage along a public road of Pnncipal Artenal or higher classification
sufficient for proper ingress and egress as determined by the County Engineer Zorung Code
14 628 300 The defined use of "automobile/truck painhng, repasr, body and fender works" is
allowed m the B-3 zone, but is prohibited m both the B-1 zone and the Community Buslness
(B-2) zone Zoning Code 14 623 020 The development standards in the B-3 zone are generally
more relaxed than the B-1 zone or the B-2 zone, in terms of maxunum building coverage,
signage, maximum bwlding height, mirumum lot area and lot frontage, etc Zoning Code
Chapter 14 628 The B-3 zone does contain development standards protective of adjacent
residential zones, including a maximum buildmg height of 35 feet witlun 150 feet of any UR-3 5
zone, a side yard setback requirement, and increased landscaping
c Consistencv of nronosal with annlicable nolicies
The Staff Report recommended derual of the proposal, based pnmanly on a determination
that the requested vanance was not appropnate The proposal was unanimously opposed by
adjacent and neighborhood property owners The concerns expressed included inadequate
access, traffic, noise, air pollution impacts, aesthetics, toxic waste disposal, parking and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 6
.
incompatibility of land use and proposed zorung Tlus included teshmony and/or letters from the
owner and manager of the insurance agency located immediately east of the site, the developer of
a 21-unit apartment complex west of the site, the owner and residents of a 14-unit apartment
complex located west of the site, the owner of the restaurant located south of the site, the owners
of single-family homes near or adjacent to the site, and other neighbonng landowners The
record also indicates numerous efforts by neighbonng landowners and the County over the past
four years to prevent illegal commercial business operahons on the site See Building and
Planning File No CV-43-92, and letters of opposition
The applicant testified that the existing use of the site was the only one that would work
on the site, and that the site had been used in the past for a cabinet shop, swmming pool and to
do auto work The applicant indicated that auto work had been done on the site five to 10 years
previous If that was the case, such operation was illegal even under the previous zorung of the
site of Local Business (LB) under the now expired Spokane County Zomng Ordinance See
Zoning Ordinance, Section 4 09 030 (8) The applicant teshfied that he had not painted cars on
the site in a year, and did only touch-up and detailing work He further stated that he could
accommodate up to seven vehicles for required parkuig inside the existing building on the site,
and that additional parking could be provided on the lot besides the four parking spaces shown
While B-3 zotvng generally unplements the Major Commercial category, it does not in this
case The auto-detailing business proposed by the applicant is an intensive business use that
should have frontage on a busy artenal, not on an intenor and cucuitous local access street that
pnmanly serves B-1 uses and single-fa~nily uses east of the site The conditions of approval
would not require immediate unprovement of Riverside Avenue, which would await the
formation of a future road improvement distnct or County road project which is not currently
planned The project does not have a legal dnveway access to Sprague Avenue, the nearest
Pnncipal Artenal
The proposal is adjacent to UR-3 5 zoning, the Urban category and single-family homes to
the north The intensive nature of the impacts from the project, as cited by adjoirung landowners,
are incompatible wrtb such adjoining single-family uses and land use category The project is
also incompatible with the adjacent office use and nearby exishng B-1 zorung of the site, and
provides no transition between the B-3 uses along Sprague Avenue and the single-family uses to
the north The proposal does not implement the "clustenrig" policies of the Major Commercial
category, since it does not share physical facilities or ameruhes with adjacent land uses The
current B-1 zoning of the site and a less intensive commercial use, sucb as office space, would
appear to be a more suitable use of tlle property The Examiner does not agree with the
applicant that an auto-detailing busmess is the only marketable use of the property While the
existing use may be the only land of business the appllcant feels comfortable in operating, that
does not provide a basis for the rezone
2 Conditions in the area in which the property is located have not changed substantiallv
since the nrooertv was last zoned ln a manner that supports the proposed rezone
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a vanety of factors,
including changed public opinion, cha.nges in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself The Zoning Code references changes in "economic,
technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone Spokane County
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96NE-7-96 Page 7
~
!
Zorung Code Section 14 402 020 (2) Waslungton courts have not required a"strong" showing
of change The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts Bassani v Countv
Commissioners, 70 Wn App 389, 394 (1993) Recent cases hold that changed circumstances
need not be demonstrated if the proposed rezone implements the policies of a comprehensive
plan Biarnson v Kltsap Countv, 78 Wn App 840, 846 (1995), Save Our Rural Environment v
Snohomish Countv, 99 Wn 2d 363, 370-371 (1983) The proposal clearly does not implement the Comprehensive Plan, as discussed above The
applicant cited as changed conditions the B-3 zoning of properties in the area, includmg the car
business located at Sprague and McDonald However, such business is located at the intersection
of a Pnncipal Artenal and a Minor Artenal, which is a suitable location for such B-3 use under
the policies of the Major Commercial category The uses located south of Riverside Avenue in
the viciruty have remained either residential or B-1 uses A similar buffer also exists west of the
site, with a multi-family use and UR-22 zoning recently being added 180 feet west of the site
3 The nronosed rezone does not bear a substantial_relationslup and would be detnmental to
the Dublic health. safetv and izeneral welfare
General consistency with a local govemment's comprehensive plan is relevant in
detenYUning whether a rezone bears a substanhal relationship to the public welfare Bassaru, at
396-98 As noted above, the proposal does not generally conform to the Comprehensive Plan
The views of the commuruty may be given substanhal weight in a rezone matter, but they
are not controlling Parkndge v Seattle, 89 Wn 2d 454 (1976) Such views must also relate
directly to the legal requirements applicable to approval of the rezone proposal being considered,
such as consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations, envuonmental
unpacts, and specific impacts to the public health, safety and welfare See Couear Mt Assocs v
I{inLy Countv, 111 Wn 2d 752, 756 (1988) In this case, neighbonng property owners
unarumously opposed the project and only the applicant provided favorable comments The
concerns expressed by neighbonng property owners were legitimate and related duectly to the
policies of the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan applicable to commercial
development The development standards of the B-3 zone applicable to the site do no provide a
sufficient buffer or transition to rnltigate the adverse effects of the project on adjacent land uses
4 The nronosed zone chanQe complies with the provisions of the State Environmental
Policv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance
The procedural requirements of chapter 43 21 C RCW and chapter 11 10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met The Heanng Examiner concurs with the Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS) issued by the Division of Building and Planrung While the project will
have adverse impacts, due to the size of the project such impacts are not sigruficant enough to
requue the preparation of an environmental impact statement No public agencies requested
wnthdrawal of the DNS issued for the proposal The initial request by the Washington State
Department of Transportation for preparation of a tnp distnbution analysis was withdrawn pnor
to the heanng
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 8
.
5 The nronosed zone chanize does not comply with the development standards of the B-3
zone
The proposed rezone does not comply wlth Zoning Code 14 628 315, which requires that
the proposed B-3 zone front on a public road of a Pnncipal Artenal or higher classification The
applicant has applied for a vanance from such standard, but the Exammer below does not find a
sufficient basis for approving such application It is also unclear from the record exactly how
the applicant would satisfy Zorung Code 14 802 040 (31), whuch requires a mini.mum of 12
spaces based on the gross square feet of the building housing the existing business The site
plan only shows space for four parlang spaces However, as testified to by the applicant, there
may be enough room within the existing building and other locations on the site to accommodate
the required parking The proposal could also be conditioned to meet landscaping requirements
D. VARIA1VCE ANALXSIS
To be approved, the vanance application must comply with the conditions and
requirements set forth in Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14 404 082, and the minimum
requirements of RCW 36 70 810 The followmg findings of fact and conclusions are made
1 Snecial circumstances do not exist such that stnct applicatlon of the minunum frontaee
reauuement of SAOkane Countv Zonin2 Code 14 618 315 creates practical difficulhes and
dennves the ~rouertv of nehts and pnvileQes emoved by other properties in the viciruty and
zoned ReLyional Business 8-31
The applicant cites as "special circumstances" that certaui adjacent uses are zoned B-3, and
enjoy the ameruties of the B-3 zone only because they front along and directly access Sprague
Avenue, a Pnncipal Artenal Tlus begs the issue, since the appropnate location for B-3 zorung
is along a Pnncipal Artenal and not along a local access street. Further, the adjacent msurance
business zoned B-1 fronts only on Riverside Avenue The proposed use of the site is too
intensive to be located along a local access street, and the artenal frontage requuement is needed
to prevent such uses from locating along a local access street Demal of the vanance would not
preclude reasonable use of the property under its existing B-1 zorung, a point conceded by the
applicant in the vanance "burden of proof ' form The prospect of losing the existing tenant,
currently using the site for an auto-detailing business, is not a justification for the vanance This
is particularly the case when such business has been operatmg illegally on the site
2 The Qrantine of the vanance will be matenally detnmental to the public welfare, and
iniunous to the nrouertv or imnrovements in the vicinity and similar zone classificahon
The vanance was opposed by adjacent landowners, who presented legitunate land use
concerns that mitigate demal of the project T'his included opposition from the owner of the
restaurant property zoned B-3 located immediately south of the site The location of an intensive
B-3 use along a local access street directly behind another B-3 seems a poor zoning choice for
the neighborhood
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 9
1
3 Consideration has been Qiven to the factors cited in Section 14 404 082(2) of the Zonine
Code. wluch mitigate denial of the vanance reauest
Stnct application of the muumum frontage requirement of the zone would not create an
unreasonable burden in light of the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code, since B-3 zorung
should not occur on a local access street and the site could be used for other purposes under the
existing zomng Relaxation of the mimmum frontage requirement would not allow a more
environmentally sensitive or energy considenng design, or result in adaptive reuse of a histonc
property A broader public or community need or interest will not be served by approval of the
vanance
4 The vanance is inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Countu's
Comnrehensive Plan
As indicated previously, the proposed use and zorung for the site is too intensive to allow
on a local access street, and the lack of frontage on a heavily traveled artenal renders the
proposal inconsistent with the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan
5 Considerahon of the factors listed m Zoning Code 14 404 082 (3) also mitiizate derual of
the nroiect '
The applicant's rahonale for granting the vanance is substantially based on precedent
established by past unlawful use of the site, as well as the alleged lack of reasonable economic
return Granting the vanance could establish a basis for further rezorung of property in the
viciruty to the B-3 zone with access only onto the local access streets of Riversxde Avenue or
Main Avenue
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings and Conclusion above, the above zone reclassification and
vanance applications are derued
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 10
t
DATEDr this 24th day of July, 1998
SP'QKA;IV~ ~OUN'I'Y HEARI1VG EXAMINNER
c s
Michael C DemPse SBA #8235 Y~ V~ 1:51,11,
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolutivn Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Exatruner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
deternunation is final and conclusive unless witlvn ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
wntten dectsion, a party of record aggneved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissloners of Spokane County, Washingtvn However, RCW 36 70B 110 (9)
zndicates that admuvstrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed wrth the board of county commissioners vrnthin fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision °
Tlus Declsion was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on July 24, 1998
DEPENDgNG ON yVHICH APPEAL P'ERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGAI,Y..,Y
APPLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE FOR THE REZOIV]E DECgSION IS EI'I'HER
AUGUST 3, 1998 OIt AUGUST 7,1998.
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng
Examiner on an application for a vanance is final and conclustve unless wrthin twenty-one (21)
calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decis2on, a party with standvrig files a Iand use
petitYOn in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW,
the date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three days after rt is malled
Th1s Decision was mailed by Certified Ma21 to the Applicant on July 24, 1998 The date
of issuance of the Heanng Examzner's vanance decision for the purpose of RCW 36 70C RCW
is therefore July 27, 1998 T'HE LAS'I' I)AY FOR APPEAL m►IF THE VAtIANCE
DECYSIOIV 'I'O SUPER~OR COYTRT BX LAND USE PE'I'ITION IS AUGUST 17. 1998.
The complete recvrd in this matter, including this decision, is on file du.rmg tbe appeal
penod with the CJffice vf the Heanng Examiner, Thu-d Floor, Public Works Buzlding, 1 026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490 The file may be
inspected, dunng normal workxng hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except
holidays, between the hvurs of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Copies of the documents in the record
will be made avaulable at the cost set by Spokane Count}r ordinance
HE Flndings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-96NE-7-96 Page 11
i ~
ZE=23=96/VE=7=96
1
~ ~ _ - •~r~ r
~ ~ ~ M1 5 5 8 0N AvFO
vE
• ~ ~
3t
~ sthtAAR • ~ ; O ..e ,
. ,
' • ~c ~ ~
- • ~a
BO ONE ~ J "
- ~ ' • ~ - ` - e CESlA EY
. I
dx ~
p~atbT ~ ;
DE5M ET AvE _ 0
aTAL o eATA Loo GC ~ '
o I
~ . . _ ,
~ W ~ae~e.e,cnr cTo ~ ~ '
0 >
Jr,
~
WAY ~
m
> AV
, • • ~ • ~ P r • ~ • ♦ , ~
EL• 2 v~ ;
y
e. ~~~1~0~~ ,m I
• ` ~ V ' AV :t
Q ~ I
~ . , ` w~~• s
- pciv.r .eivd
IV ~
, • ~
= dAY vA 6-L..EY W/aY m
. .
• a o ~ ~
. ~ & ul • 3~~ ~s►•~v ~ I
• i
t~ 6q 6an.tT04 $ .
L pj
~ v$ x R{ SIWQLI . dsm i
El. ~99 Pt,9E
~ ~ ~ • ~ r • ~ • • ~ • .I • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • i
. • ~
~ 0 PCST FyE
iy C
~
~ , _W~ - ~ ~ ~ __...a _ ~ ' ~ '
6i0 • ~ ' • vo ta ~
47-H ~ 4YM A►VE
tuSSS
tn
d 6 ~ v~.~~
~
E
. v ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~
7T M AV E ~ y T@l A ~
. 0
EL 20I4 8 T H Av E
. . . . , ~ ~
~s... ~ ~
SA YIi , e4V E 4 a e~ii l~ I
J
l Q 41$ ~ /a
8/7/96 HE Staff Report :gor ZE-23-96/VE-7-96 Page 1
.
~ y ~ • ~
1T~~ S • ~1~ M - tl:±1
•Q ~ ~ ~ t i a+• / .
~y ~°i ~ ~ ► 3r
/ 1-0 oAo
,1 b~p ~ y ~ e y 6 0 9~ tlp~
4~
/ ~ ~ ~ 9 L u A X° °a~a o4i p dr
r ~ } 1; 6 , `.t- • i sa,'~ ~ ~ n ~ R • rx ° ~ti Q a ~
~
~ ~It I q
a. ba e p ~p
~ . ~ : ~ , ~ ~ r 4 Q ~ ~ q ' :~pa •~N U
rRO 1
i 1 ' ~a ~ ~ < < r ~q~ 1 " ~ ~C ~ ~f ~ ~ ~{R ♦ I ~
(T c~ ~~a
II'.{, tl ~~14~•+,,,~~• r ~ ~ i ` ~
~ g ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ Iq~'~ fl • fl ~ .rr ~ ~ ~ { , ` . ~ ~
rr; x~ ~ i fJ F`
10, Th! 1 ~n ~ t' r ~ - y S r'
43
o
, ' 1 ~ ` • ^ WA
qcoxp--
~ 1 ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ' t~d ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .
~ Hp s° i~
ta ~ ~ ~ a ~ 1 t~"~•°' j ^ r ~ ~
~ t t w~ •o ~ ' T"~ ' ~ '•o-~ 1 _r i~ 1 ( y(
J ~ d J ~ 5 „ • ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7y1
6 tyj ~
~ ~ e ~ I~ !
~ • „rs t ~ ~ . I ~ ; R 1 Q
,
~ 1'M`^'~ , • ' 1 ~ ~I' ~ ' Ii~ ~ 1 ~ ~
°
3 ~ ~ ~ °a + ~ a ~ ,
i ,
~p+ Q ~ ' ti • r . / ~ ' r 1
~ , ~ • r ~ Id :y ~ t ~ t ~ t
o~'~ • ~ ~ p 1 ~ ~ t ~ ` 5 ~ , 1 ~ ~
- w 1
)1 p q 0 O~ a r w.'.~^+ ( ' (i '7 ~ 1
h
Q Y
~
r { l ~ 6 Y + p C ~p ~ i~ ~ y~ c • ~ IdA/ 9
f
J ~ e ` O r~ ! t
, ~ ~ a ~ pOOO 0 ~ ~ ' . ~ .•i / 1
~
.00~!
0g ' j ~ - , • .,-~'••.i-.
1. ~ ~ r p • 6 C? i /
e e ~ ~ o ~q } ^
6 ' • ~ ~ ~ e e ~ y Q . , »o r• f~ J
w,c
.1 r 6 e ~ ♦ ~ ~
+@4 ~ ca p '''-yt•'-
a O 0 8p ~ $ \,r- r
~ o0ovf o ~~Q 0 ~ • /
V~e
I _
~t
~
~ e,. '
. .
~ - UR~ ~
. .
. ~ ~ o!
t R
\
- ~ ~ VAOtA
1~
• ~ ~ ; 1d~~`a° ,
~uR o
° 7 ~ ►~t w N
' ~ g p
go
o~s'-A~ G ~,S p►`°U ' '
. B 0 Y " ~T 0+ r^ ~ ! T
~ E ~ or. y ~ ~
no
~ . •
4 ~ J . 8' • .i
~ ' ~~i ~ C i • v '
~2
a A
t F, L %4p
• • e
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~
o ; j
• 2`~►
~ ~b~~:~~ • _ _ s V~° ' ~ ~ Y .
• ~ m .r~ ~ ~ , ~ t,. ~ t ~
' Q O t u
• " ' ~9 ~ ~q✓ ~ ° 1 a
U blvs ~ _ ~ E +
t
- . ,
1 9~ o ~r
9m33
~ . U ~ ~y.g1,~
~
x , uF~~
a o
- . ~
~
~ PG ~ a~ ~ : ~
w
~ ► _ _ ~~"2~ ~ T N~ ~ c~° - ~ ~
-
~
~ ;
T
~
° 4 ~ s
Ao
'[M a`
~►.V ~-8 ~
x t~o~ " YN ~ Ttn a►~1~
cr
o ~ ~ _ S p~,ge
. ~o g
EL ~-96
'1196 s"'f f Repott
g~
4 ~rl
4 ~ T" ~
~ • ~
. ~ . ~ .
.
494 ' .
► a N~we.e° t5 • - '
pA ~s~e!oa~~s~eeva°°,•~ee'°, ~°e ~ t t ~ a `t.~•a 'a "ti,.•
•M° ° ~ o • ` /Oa~
p~eooe a°~ooaeee• peoe~ti Z y,, ' ` i, ~
~ - oe aoll ~s0~o~oY ovesao ~ y{~ , d { . d1~~~J~'` l
111
°O~ ~e e e°°°Oc e o 000 °i ~
. * ..oll °°°"°e„o.o~~ . '~t ~~f OO . .
J"' •
•00• ~Y 1
0 0000 NQ~ ~ 1~t ~Ol'~ r*•^~y=~ • t vY~
• y ~ O O p
10 ~ w as~oN • ,
. . . , ~
o ~ ~ ~ ~••-1.r' ~ WQ
~ , p e~ . e L ~ o a . ► .
f3g P= KANE ~ r .
w '
e~ • ~t~Tt6~ 1 ~t' Y-. t > - N e~ ~ . ~yy ~ •
A t~ • P ` ' ~l ~ _ _ _
f T19ERN
~r~--~+..~;'.~.--'_ O _ - a~~ rn s • e e • e~' _ - . ~~a..,~ , ~ ~ .
.zr.'y' ~ t o • ~ . ~.r~~j,~'««:
1 ~ ~ tl~~ • ~ ~ x-~A ' , d
~ y o or 0 p • 4 ' Ao~ 'rCOQ , ~
~ s o
96 O,. ~ . t~ ~r o A
o
h4
pe[1~t
• Hc'~~ ~ ~ n
Lgvoa~-'- ost *
, 0 00Ng
~ ° WT
~ , .
~
_ ` r • ~
c
16 , ,t u~►~ ; ,o
yypY u $ e n ~ ~ ~ '
6 ~
~ ~ 0~~I'r C ~ , ~ . . • a
`
a
.t.U 1 1 ~ I . 00~~ J' ~^r •
p 8t e' o` O 1
G~4 t ~ t~ ~ f i O a 0
, 00 ~ •
Y t ~ ~ T'~r~ AdC87o p e e
scho
e
vvelt , ~
, sqxoe_,o~a,e~ ~ J,o+3 e►,f~,~~~„~.it~ ~ • a
.i . \ . I~
~ o ' ' • ~,_a ise°
~ •
cm o
` ~ •O • ~0~~ e 00oe o
1 C~ .~08 ~ ~0 ° ep , • o .
a ~ • •
~'-.-"""'..W f 1 jQ~O ~ •,~^~J ~ _ e~s ery o°e~ o o~ ° e 1
~~{~48 1~ - la'Uu*~ AV~ o aa a a e ~ 1 e _ a
~ 4lys} p ° ot voa~~jOO a
~ ?~i~ ~ ~ ~ p ~y •Q •oe •00 P
-o 0 ~ ~ r a
-s
. o ~
`~t ~a~'s 11~ ~ , 11 e ~ ' • . ~ o
je• a
!~o ~".~u b q~} ~ ~8~) ~ ~1C ~lOpRl~ ~['R1 a e .~o jQ8? t t+~ } a
'i 1 s_- .eo• e
2064
- 8tb
a
~ . 9 C , e
4A
~
pat7ae
~ ~zra %-e 1 - ~ - ~ ~
p~ ' i , ~
-/"i
' Q~
A^e~
for ~
~y
` - Repon
~1'1196 JAE: 5%ff
1
~ ' 1i J
Y Y ~ ~ ~ 1
~ ~ N
~
t ~
1~}
r
i
-
~ ~ ..r
i ~ r-
« ' ~ ~ ~ ,
~
~
t~
't~
i i
;
l ~
t N ~ ~
~ _
o '
i '
~
1 ~ ► . r.. ~
1 1• ~ ~ 1 {.J
~
~
~
P a~ e
6 /VB-1~96
for ZE 23/g ~ \
f l~
f Rep°rt ~
S/? /96
DMSI0N OF BUILDI1VG AND PLANNY1VG REPORT
TO: SPOKA1`tE COIJNTY I~EARING EXAIViI1VER
FROMe CURREIVT PLANNI1VG SEC'I'IO1V
Y)AT'E: AUGUST 7,1996 SUBJEC'I': ZE-23-96; ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOIV FRO1Vg LTRBAN
RE5EDENTIAI., 3.5 (Ut-3.5) AND IVEIGHBORHOOI~ BUSINESS
(B-1) TO REGgONAL BZJSMSS (B-3) AND VE-7-96; REQgJEST
FOR VARIIANCE
g. GENERAL INFORIVIATIO1V
Applicant: Alfred Leichner
11207 E 9th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 924-5036
Contact Planner: Louis Webster
Locataon: Generally located north of and adjacent to Riverside Avenue
approxunately 350 feet west of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and
McDonald Road, m the SW 1/4 of Section 15, Townslup 25 North, Range 44
EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential3 5(UR-3 5) and
Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed
in the Regional Business (B-3) zone and a variance from the frontage reqi,urement
specified by Section 14 628 315 of the Spokane County Zorung Code
II. SI'TE I1VF'ORMATIOIv
A. Site Size: Approxunately 13,659 square feet
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. I.and Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan category of the subject
property is both Urban and Major Commercial Tlus fact makes the subject
property in a transitional area wluch is defined in the glossary of the
Comprehensive Plan as "the fnnge areas between two or more Comprehensive
Plan land use categones This is an area which can allow developments
complying vvith either of the Land-Use map Categones dependent upon the
decision maker's srte-specific approval " The Urban (L) category involves an
estunated 10% of the subject property is intended to provide the opporturuty for
development of a"city-like" envuonment wluch includes vanous land uses
Due to the vanety and mix of land uses and activrties found in the Urban
Category, there are few land use activities that would be inappropnate
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 6
The Major Commercial (C) category involves approximately 90% of the subject
properiy and is intended to provide the opportumty for development of
commercial uses, specifically commuruty and regional shopping centers and
commercial uses, directly related to major throughways This statement in the
comprehensive plan about duect relationslup to major throughways and the
corresponding requsrement in the Zorung Code is the reason for the vanance
request The proposed zone reclassification unplements the majonty of the
Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban and Major Commercial
Categones of the Comprehensive Plan
2. Arterial Road Plan The subject property is located at the end of
Riverside Avenue wluch is identified on the Spokane County Artenal
Road Plan as a Local Access Street No dedication or Future Acquisition
Area (FAA) is required to implement the Artenal Road Plan
3. County PaPflts Plan: Mission Park is located about a mile north of the
subject property and is the closest county park
C. Snte Charactenstics The subject property is nearly level, vvith an existing
building wluch occupies approxunately 17% of the subject property An
automobile detailing business is currently run from the existing building
The subject property adjoins existing parking areas on the west and south
without clear property boundanes
D. Neiginborhoocl Characterishcs The subject property is north of the cul de
sac of Riverside Avenue Single family residences are located to the north
and businesses surround the property to the west, south, and east The
neighborhood is dominated by the commercial businesses to the south along
Sprague Avenue
E. Zoning Analysis The proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is the most
intensive business zone in Spokane County The nearest existing Regional
Business (B-3) zone is adjacent to the subject property along its southern tip
(File # 41-75C) Other Regional Business (B-3) zoning exists 100 feet east of
the subject property along Sprague Avenue (File # 12-93C)
The existing auto detailing business use is not in compliance vvith the Zonuig
Code and the requested zone reclassification is an attempt to make the existing
illegal, non-conforming use a legal, conforming use See complaint file # CV-
43-92
Automobile/truck pa,ulting, repalr, body and fender works is a permitted use in
the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone Section 14 628 315 of the Spokane
County Zorung Code requues that any building site in the Regional Business
(B-3) zone shall have frontage on a Pnncipal Artenal The subject property has
no such frontage and the applicant is requesting a variance from that section of
the Zoning Code Wlule the proposed use is an allowed use in the Regional
Business (B-3) zone, the subject property does not meet the mirumum
development standards of the requested zone
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 7
Proposal Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and Neighborhood Busmess (B-
1) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural
Suburban (AS) in 1955 (99-55) and Local Busmess (LB) in 1955
(171-55)
North Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously
established as Agncultural Suburban (AS) in 1955 (99-55)
South Neighborhood Business (B-1) and Regional Busmess (B-3)
established in 1991, previously established as Local Busmess
(LB) in 1955 (171-55) and Commercial (C) in 1975 (41-75C)
East Neighborhood Business (B-1) established in 1991, previously
established as Local Business (LB) m 1955 (171-55)
West Neighborhood Busmess (B-1) and Regional Busmess (B-3)
established in 1991, previously established as Local Business
(LB) in 1955 (171-55) and Commercial (C) in 1975 (41-75C)
F. I,and iJse Analysis The existing land use is an auto detalhng business and is
an allowed use in the proposed zone Businesses lilce the one existing on the
subject property aze generally not compatible with residential uses which exist
to the north wrthout significant landscaping and bufferuig as required by the
Spokane County Zorung Code The existing business may be compatible with
the existing commercial land uses to the east, south and west The lot is not
large enough to accommodate the parlang required by Spokane County Zorung
Code Section 14 802 040
Srte Automobile detailing business
North Single family residences
South Parking lot and restaurant commercial
East Insurance sales
West Parlang lot for commercial use
G. Variance Amalysis:
In order to be approved, a vanance must comply with the conditions and
requirements specified by Section 14 404 082 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Spokane
County Zorung Code The following analyzes how the proposed vanance
complies vvith the relevant above-cited condrtions and requirements
Response 14.404.0821 a 8c b. The subJect property is unusual given its
location on the cul de sac of Riverside Avenue The practical difficulty in tlus
instance is that the subject property does not meet the minunum development
cntena of the Spokane County Zorung Code for the proposed zone No evidence
has been submitted to support a claim that other similarly situated properties
enjoy any pnvilege derued to the applicant Claims by adjacent landowners that
granhng the vanance and zone reclassification would be detnmental to the public
welfare are a part of the file In response to question "D " on the burden of proof
form, the applicant states that "the business has been in for a while and I haven't
hear of any problems or complaints " The existence of a zoiung complaint file
created in 1992 seems to contradict this statement
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 8
Response 14.404.082 2 a. Stnct application of the Zorung Code,
specifically Section 14 628 315 does not create an unreasonable burden on the
applicant Derual of the variance would not preclude reasonable use of the subject
property The applicant's answer to question "F " on the burden of proof form
notes that the site could be put to a reasonable and permitted use without the
vanance
Response 14.404.082 2 b. Applicant's response to burden of proof form
question F is that "It already is" The applicant fails to explain how the requested
vanance would enable a better design
Response 14.404.082 2 c. The broader public interest wnll not be served by
granting the variance The applicant has not met dus cntena
Response 14.404.082 3iL The applicant's response to the burden of proof form
question "E " is that there is "one other business on Riverside in suYUlar zone that
is permitted" Staff assumes the applicant is refemng to the insurance business to
the east of the subject property Tlus is not a similar situation An auto detailing
business is not suiular to insurance sales in terms of land use and unpact to the
neighborhood The vanance request is not consistent vvith tlus cntena
Response 14.404.082 3 b. Granti.ng the vanance request could establish a
precedent in t11e area when subsequent vanance requests are considered
Response 14.404.082 3 c. The applicant states that the variance is requ.ired for
reasonable economic return The applicant has been unsuccessful in finduig
tenants that are able to comply with the existing zoiung Tlus should not be used
to justify the vanance
Response 14.404.082 3 d. The applicant states, in response to the burden of
proof form question "K that the vanance is inconsistent vvith the purpose and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan and staff agrees
Response 14.404.082 3 e. The applicant states, in response to the burden of
proof form question "M that the practical difficulty that has given nse to the
need for the vanance did not exist pnor to the applicant owning the subject
property The applicant further states that he has owned the property for 30 years
The practical difficulty in tlus case is that the subject property does not meet the
development critena as set forth in the Spokane County Zorung Code and staff
believes that the practical difficulty has always existed
Response 14.404.082 3f. Approval of the vaziance would not result in a de
facto zone reclassification
Response 14.404.082 3 g. The purpose of the variance is not to cucumvent
density regulations designed to protect groundwater
In swnmary, the applicant has not justified the request for the vanance in light of the
cntena specified by Section 14 404 082 of the Spokane County Zoning Code
H. Site PIlam: The srte plan shows the existmg building, the subject property and
the adjacent roads Twenty feet of Type I landscaping is required along the
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 9
north property line and five feet of Type III landscaping is requued along the
south properiy line Spokane County Zorung Code Sechon 14 802 040 (33)
requires 12 parlculg and four parking spaces aze shown All traveled surfaces
are to be paved per Spokane County Zorung Code Section 14 802 080
The site plan subnutted for review by the Heazing Exanuner is general in nature
Detailed review to detennine compliance with all Zoning Code regulations and
conditions of approval is recommended to be admuustrative and to occur pnor
to issuance of a Building or Change of Use Pernut -
Use Automobile detail business
Proposed buildings one (exishng)
Site Coverage 17%
Square Footage 2,304 Square Feet
Bi.ulding Setbacks Existine/Proposed ReQwred
Front yard (Riverside Ave ) 80 feet 65 / 35 feet
Side yard (east) 29 feet 0 feet
Side Yard (west) 15 feet 0 feet
Rear yard (north) At least 15 feet 15 feet
Parking 4 spaces 12 spaces
Maximum
Structure Height Less than 35 feet 35 feet
1. Circulatiom The property is accessed from Riverside Avenue as shown on the
site plan Fue Distnct # 1 will need to approve the access and internal
circulation pnor to the issuance of a building or change of use pernut
J. H)rainage A drainage plan wnll be requued prior to the issuance of any change
of use pernuts This plan must be reviewed and approved by the Spokane
County Division of Engineenng prior to change of use pernut being issued
K. Power Transffiission I.ines/Other Know►n Easements None known
L. Water Supply The proposal is served by the Modern Electnc Water Distnct
Provisions for water service are requured pnor to the issuance of a change of use
permit
M. Sewage I)isposal Connection to public sewer system is required Plans and
specifications wnll be reviewed and approved pnor to the issuance of any change
of use permit
N. School The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No comment has
been received
0. Fflre Protection The proposal is vritlun Fire District No 1 No comment has
been received
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 10
P. CultuPa9ltesources None have been identified
Q. Parks and Itecreation: No comments have been received
R. VVetlancis No wetlands are shown on the Spokane County Wetlands Inventory
Maps
III. ENVIRON1VENTAL ItEVIEVV y
An Envuonmental Checklist was subnutted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
Division of Building and Planrung The review considered the specifics of the
proposal, other available uiformation, County ordulances, other regulations and laws,
possible standazd Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and
other County policies and guidelines The Division of Building and Planrung has
determined that "No probable sigruficant adverse unpacts" would result from the
proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance
("DNS")
The "DNS" was cuculated to 13 other agencies ofjunsdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment
The "DNS" comment penod ends August 5, 1996 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners vvithin
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site The
Heanrig Examiner may consider additional envuonmental related testunony at the
public heanng
IV. DMSI0N OF BUILDING ANI) PLANNING SIJMMA1tY &
RECO1VI1VENDATIOI+1
The proposed Regional Busmess (B-3) zone unplements the Goals, Objectives and
Decision Guidelines of the Urban and Major Commercial Categones of the
Comprehensive Plan but the proposed zone reclassification does not comply wnth the
mirumum development standards of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone The
requested vanance is not justified by the applicant nor is the variance request
consistent with the cntena for a vanance as specified by Section 14 404 082 of the
Spokane County Zorung Code The Drvision of Building and Planiung recommends
denial of the variance and zone reclassification
V. CO1VI)I'g'IONS OF APPROVAL (should the request be gcanted)
u. All co0ditions imposed by the Hearing Ezaminec sha116e binding on the
"Applicant", whflch terms sha➢1 include the owner or owners of the
property, flneirs, assggns and successors.
ii. The zone reclassification and variance applies to the following real
property:
Lot 13 of Evans Addition to Spokane County, as per plat thereof recorded in
Volume 3 of Plats, Page 47, together wrth that portion of the North %z of
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 11
vacated Riverside Avenue lying south of and adjoining said Lot 13 and lying
West of the East line of Lot 7 extended across said Avenue
SPOKA1vE COUNTY I)IVISION OF BUII,DING ANI) PI.A,NNING
1 The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone and the Aquifer
Sensihve Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended
2 The applicant sha11 develop the subject property generally in accord with the concept
presented to the Heanng Body Vanations when approved by the Division
Director/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not lunited to bu.ildmg locarion
landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zorung Code, and the onginal
intent of the development plans shall be maintasned
3 The Division of Building and Planrung shall prepare and record vvith the Spokane
County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a
vanety of special condihons unposed as a result of approval of a land use action
Tlus Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the condrtions of approval affecting
the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded vvitlun the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the
Spokane County Division of Bu.ilding Planning The Title Nohce shall generally
provide as follows
The parcel of propert,y legally descrIlbeci as [ ] is the subject of a fland use
action by a Spokane County Hearang ]Body or Adaninistrative Official on [
amposing a variety off special developBnent conditgons. Fi➢c No. [ ] is
available for inspeetion and copying im the Spoflane County Division of Buildgng
and Plannfng.
4 Approval is reqLUred by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and
sigrung plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any bwlding
permits
5 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance
acceptable to the Division Director/designee sha11 be submitted with a
performance bond, or other suitable guarantee, for the project pnor to release of
building pennits Landscapmg shall be installed and ma.i.ntained so that sight
distance at access points is not obscured or impa.ired
6 Direct light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the
property boundary
7 The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admuusteredlenforced as
authonzed by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include
Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems,
building accessibilrty, construction type, occupancy classificahon, exrting, extenor
wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Building and
Planiung reserves the nght to confirm the actual address at the tune of building
pernut )
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 12
At#acbed are comments and recommended conditions of approval from
interested agencies:
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty, dated July 12, 1996
Spokane County Division of Utilities, dated July 25, 1996
Spokane County Division of Engineenng and Roads, dated August 7, 1996
8/7/96 HE Staff Report for ZE-23-96 Page 13
RECEIVED
SPOMiVE COUNTY
SPOKANE COUNTY
~ UL 12 1996
~ ~~EARivAR p AIR POIIUTION
~u- o K Arm~ CONTROI AUTHORITY D1VIS10(V OF BUILDIN(3 AidD PlMfdiMB
WEST 1101 COLLEGE, SUITE 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 e(509) 456-4727 Fax (509) 459-6828dy.
Date July 12, 1996
To Louis 1lVebster
Spokane County Division of Buiiding & Planning
From: IVlabel Caine
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Subject SCAPCA COMMEIVTS REGARDING File IVo ZE-23-96NE-7-96
fSEPA checklistl
Thank you for the opporturnty to comment on the environmental documents submitted to our
office Following is a list of concernsAssues that, at a minimum, need to be addressed for this
project. SCAPCA encourages proponents to contact their offices at 1101 West College,
Spokane, WA 99201 for additional information
# All air pollution regulations must be met
* SCAPCA strongly recommends that all travelled surfaces 0.e , ingress, egress, parking
areas, access roadsf be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions
# SCAPCA Regulation I, Article V, requires that a IVotice of Construction and Application
for Approval be submitted to and approved by our Agency prior to the construction,
installation or establishment of an air pollution source This includes any fuel fired
equipment rated at greater than 400,000 BTU/hour (boilers, hot water heaters, ovens,
etc It also includes paint booths, and other sources of air contaminants
# SCAPCA Regulation I, Article IV may require registration with this agency.
# SCAPCA Regulation I, Articie VI, and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV, address emission
standards All emission standards must be met
Failure to meet SCAPCA regulations may result in delays, closure and civil and/or criminal
sanctions
Page 14
iL 4: Prented on RtYytled Paper
To: LOUIS VVEBSTER, Spolcane County Department of Building and Planning - Hearing Examiner
From: Spokane County Utilities
Date: 7125196
Subject Conditions of Approva9
Planning Action IVumber. ZE-0023-96 Type of Action: ZR Zone Reciass for Alfred Leichner
Applicant: Leichner, Alfred Legal Owner: Leichner, Alfred
11207 9th Avenue 11207 9th Avenue
Spokane WA 99206 Spokane WA 99206
Sewer Service:
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer
connection permit is required (See item 12)
SS12 Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover',
only those plan sheets showmg sewer plans and specifications for (1)Public Sewer Connections
and Facilities (2) rtg (3 (4J9fy-
S for review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to fnal~zation of the
project and or the issuance of permit to connect
(1)
SS13 Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of (1)Public Sewer
Connections and Facilities (2$)eab4&~bmg (3
Geafles~eAS (4)Dq"Sewe nor to the finalization of the
project and or the issuance of the permit to connect to the Pubiic Sewer System
(1)
SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit
Water Service•
WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided m accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
RECEIVED
SFOKANE COUNTY
,IU1 2 4 1996
DIVISION OF BUIIaDING AND PLANNING
sY page 15
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGIMEgt' S CONDYTYOrTS OF APPR0VAL," ZOPES
.lanningDepartment-- . .
=
TO. Spokane County P
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: 07/31/96
PROJECT: UR-3.5 /B-1 to 8-3 "
FIIE ZE-23-96 (VE-7-96) / ( DRZE-18 9-96 )
Hearing/Review Date: Auqust 7, 1996
Sponsor/Applicant: Alfred Leichner
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner. Louis Webster
Design/Review Date: (April 17, 1996 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prxor to release of a bumlding permit or use of property as proposed:
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing
to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the
formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate
in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to
Riverside Avenue
5 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated
herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and
participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost
of these improvements This provision is applicable to Riverside
Avenue.
CC Applicant Alfred Leichner
Engineer/Surveyor Charles Simpson P ag e 16
r'aqe 2
August 7, 1996 April 17, 1996
ZE-23-96 (VE-7-96) DRZE-189-96
6 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accompiished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
7 The County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway
Section for the improvement of Riverside Avenue which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the addition of
approximately 37 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed.
S All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal
10 No construction wor]c is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer Al1 work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 Al1 required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
12 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following.
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in
consideration of Mutual Benef its now or to be hereafter derived, do
for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the
above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and
to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for
improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and
authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW
36 88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast
their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution
method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest
against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88 065 and Chapter 35.43
RCW.
Page 17
Paqe 3
Auqust 7, 1996 April 17, 1996
ZE-23-96 (VE-7-96) DRZE-189-96
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described
below, said owner (s) and successor (s) further agree :(1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and
expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within
the proposed RID is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the
right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements
called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the
petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal
to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll, provided
further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to
the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the
property
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by
Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole
expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the
improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten
(10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is
applicable to Riverside Avenue.
13 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
undErground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for ad3ustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
14 Riverside Avenue is an unmaintained County Road, if Riverside Avenue
is not paved the applicant shall pave to McDonald Road, so as not to
increase traffic on a gravel road. The applicant may utilize a
private road within the public right of way to meet access standards.
Page 18
i
f~- S
ENGINEER' S iZEVIEW SHEET
AS BUILT PLANS RE•CEIVED
~
REZONE FILE # ZE-023-96 -96
Related File # ( VE-7-96 )
AARD It ( DRZE-189-96 )
Date to Review 08/07/1996 # 1
Date to AA & DR 04/ 17/ 1996 Time 2:15
Date Received 04/04! 1996
Project Name UR-3.5 / B-1 TO B-3 BLDG No. L,ots o No. Acres 13,65SF
Ra.nge - Township - Section
45153.4115
SITE ADDRESS RIVERSIDE/N SPRAGUE/W MCDONALD/S MAIN PARCEL
Applicant's Name ALFRED LEICHNER Phone # 924-5063
Address 11207 9TH AVE Phone 2# 922-89b9
SPOKANE WA 99206
FLOOD ZONE No W S School 356 Date Conditions Mailed
Billing Name Owner ALFRED LEICHNER Engineer CHARLES E SIMPSON
Address Address 11207 9TH AVE Company SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC.
SPOKANE WA 99206 Address 909 N ARGONNE RD
City SPOKANE,WA 99212
Signed
Phone Phone 924-5063 Phone/FAX (509)926-1322 FAX (509)926-13
Date
Building Contact Person: TAMMY JONES/LOUIS WEBSTER Phone 1l 456-3675
;Date Submitted Description Initials
DATE FEES RECEIVED
UATE PRIORITY FEES RECEIVED COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 13 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED/DATE COMPLETED - MAILED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
DATE BOND RECEIVED - BOND AMOUNT RECEIVED
DATE BOND RELEASED - DATE AS BUILT RD PLANS
0$/07/ 199b HEARING EXAM APPROVED )ENIED 'PEALED BCC
APPEALED PROJECT 4PPROYED EMED
STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICIAN (SYL/SUZANNE) ~
STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
I
OL
~
f.~ 9J L4.- ~s
: f`'!,~_'"t:►-~...n:
~Er . • -
S P O K A N E
O U N T Y
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SC07T, P.E., DIRECTOR
MEMOP;.ANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning; Tom Davis
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Wyn Birkenthal
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Boundary Review Boazd
Spokane Regional Transportation Council
Spokane Transit Authority
WA State Department of Transportation
WA State Department of Ecology
WA State Department of Health
WA State Department of Natural Resources (Colville)
WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife (Spokane)
Fire Protection Districts No. l, 9
Central Valley School District
Mead School District
Modern Electric Water Company
Whitworth Water District
City of Spokane, Planning Department
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE: July 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Review and comments for below listed files for the hearing of August 7, 1996
Please review and return any comments for the following files by July 24, 1996. If you have
any comments regarding roads and circulation in your response, please forward that response
also to the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Please forward your comments to the
attention of the assigned plaooer.
1. ZE-23-96/VE-7-96
Zone Reclassification and Frontage Variance
Sec. 15-2544
Sponsor: Alfred Leichner
Assigned Planner: Louis Webster
2. PN-1796-96/ZN-25-96
Preliminary Plat and Zone Reclassification
Sec. 8-26-43
Sponsor: Ben Winkler
Assigned Planner: Steve Davenport
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
BuItDuvG Pt-toNE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
P[.ArrtviNC PHOrrE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243
TDD: (509) 324-3166
M ~ 4 ti
v~ a-7
Z C. ~
~ r~ f2 3. v
,
1~v
. v'~ S ~v~ O~ ~~~/~~1~/ ~ ~ ~~~-.~'✓i✓l,c~C7 - - -
~I
r
(IG /C/1- T'i
. ,
.
-
Dor TP-ho
~
. ~ ~ v4 t~i-/d:rg- 1'H E:, ~ t-~ g ~E~1 vq
<4 C. 1(-:~ C-- fz C~ w~~fl s~~cc t/~~-.~
~~/~G,~~`'~.~~
l`~1 C<,Ock-k.5
11AJC-7,t L Ff ~.S S T e) _
.
. ~~-?-10~ • ~ ( - -
UW c T ~ vL rI_
cv7
~c~~.~ - - . 7
~
~
,
y~ ~-K~~ ~ ~ ~ y
1 - J 6~ ' ~ ~ i//(~
-
.S~i~-~/~f ~C/1ih~ r' ~ - S ~
~ . ~ i I`~_
L.- C1~ U~t-1~'
_ _
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER' S CONDYTIONS OF APPROVALL" ZONES
TO• Spokane County Planning Department
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: 07/31/96
PItOJECT: UR-3.5 /B-1 to B-3
FILE ZE-23-96 (VE-7-96) / (DRZE-189-96)
Hearing/Review Date: August 7, 1996
Sponsor/Applicant: Alfred Leichner
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: Louis Webster
Design/Review Date: (April 17, 1996 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the
Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact,
Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans.
3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to
be occupied or traveled by vehicles
4 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant
may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing
to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the
formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36 88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate
in the cost of these improvements This provision is applicable to
Riverside Avenue
5 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated
herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by 3oining and
participating in a County Road Pro3ect (CRP) to the extent of the
required improvement Spokane County will not participate in the cost
of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Riverside
Avenue
CC Applicant Alfred Leichner
Enqineer/Surveyor Charles Simpson
C ~ Ptge 2 r ' August 7, 1996 April 17, 1996
2E-23-96 (VE-7-96) DRZE-189-96
6 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accompiished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer
7 The County Engineer has designated a Commercial Local Access Roadway
Section for the improvement of Riverside Avenue which is adjacent to
the proposed development This will require the addition of
approximately 37 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the
development Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed.
8 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction
and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions
pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at
the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County
Engineer
9 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
10 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or
proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County
Engineer All work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer
11 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer
12 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6"
which specifies the following.
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in
consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do
for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the
above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and
to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for
improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and
authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for
the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW
36 88 050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast
their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution
method pursuant to RCW 36.88 030, and/or by not filing a protest
against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43
RCW
ti
Page 3 ° August 7, 1996 April 17, 1996
ZE-23-96 (VE-7-96) DRZE-189-96
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described
below, said owner(s) and successor (s) further agree (1) that the
improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID
are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together
with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and
expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within
the proposed RID is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves,
their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the
right, as authorized under RCW 36 88 090, to ob3ect to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements
called for in con3unction with the formation of a RID by either the
petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal
to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County
Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided
further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to
the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the
pr_operty
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is
created or any County Road Improvement pro3ect is authorized by
Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole
expense of the owner ( s) of property within the RID or served by the
improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten
(10) years from the date of execution below This provision is
applicable to Riverside Avenue
13 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for ad3ustments or
relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for ad3ustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
14 Riverside Avenue is an unmaintained County Road, if Riverside Avenue
is not paved the applicant shall pave to McDonald Road, so as not to
increase traffic on a gravel road The applicant may utilize a
private road within the public right of way to meet access standards
. ~
or=FTcz_ Or- rHr roUra-rY Er~~ ~~~~R
SPC71tANE i:Ol.)hl°i"Y 9 WASW [ nlGTOnI
s4 p r.z 1 179 1996
TI-1o apr-oa ane COUr7ty Plann.inq DepartmE,nt c CUrr-ei-lt f'lanni.ng
Acima. nistratc-r a
rr -T, rn 4 Spu1~.~a n(=-? Gciun t y f i-iginper8 5 Depa rtrn c:-,,nL- (3a1A
Si_i r~ )cacto C---- rid a. t a n~~ f A F) p r v a 1 Z-_- n E L" h a n ge ki ~ - D R Z F_ 1B'3
App1 i cantt; hiame I_c=ichner~__
Ser~icin t5q Tr-iwnshi.p~.-~ Np Rai7qe -4-1 EWh'I
rP`_Zona.ng
Che f-=~ 11----W 1. (l Ca "Con dit ions, ---f AprJ 1`' oV al" f-z-Y the c7 kl oV E' Y C' f e Y' E' nC E' --oI-1 E'
charcae are si-tbmi tted tM1 tl-ie Sp.--4Lane C-_-unty I'lAnning L7e-partmcnL f-_,r
inc1usion in the Desiqn Review h'leetincI schedulerl ALr -L1 _179 19D6o
P r- iorto r- e1~~~La ofi a bui1 ri i. n q pe rm it i-ir- ur e of t i-~ ~pr---Iper t y ~s
pr--,p+_-s eci a
E - fu Acr_o--ys peYf111tr-, appr---achcas to tl-,e C-_-+_tnty Ritaci Systcm sha11 bLm
ob ta.ineci fr -_-m the (~-Dui ity F-i-iqii-iee r o
k~~43 Appl icant sh~al 1miithr~it for appr-owa1 by the apotane GC-Ltnty
EnqinPer ri---ad, dr,.-,a.n~agc-a and access p1arisp
E-44 TI-~~ applicarif sriall sitbrria.t fi---ir apprcival ljy ttie Spc4ane C~~lunty
Engineer- and the S~c4ane C~~iunty Heal th Distr-ic tot c~etailed
Comb1 Cl eUoCl -s1tEseW aC.) E 5y5tefYl plan -i('1 ~sLt1'' f`=t Ce wc~ LE' 1'' d1spi-saZ
plafl f-=IY the E? I°1 t1 1`' t? pY' o--I) t~ ~ t r-olr ~3or t x on t hCa lr eof 1 f thE~
deve1iDpment is ph~.~~ed.
E-45 A parE.x iig p 1an aricl t r affic c i r - cu1ati----n p 1 ansh~~a 1 1 be subm it t c d
ai-id ap~roied by the Spc4ane C-DUiIty Enga.neero The de5iqnp
1ocata.on GAncJ arrangemen~ ---I-~ parF a.ng sta lls sha11 be a.ri
t..~cc--irdance witI-i stancJarc1 Qnqineering practiceso I'aving -_Ir
surfacLnc~ ~s appr-ovec.~ ray the C~~jUn#.y Engxneer wll l be reqi_t.z.reci
l~ i-,iIr any p!-o1`' j: 1ofl c~ f the p1'' r-I] C~ ct W l"I ll. C l"I Y. S tu b-t...`~- 1:1C i: U(-.J .1 E d o1'
tra-velecJ by vehic i e7
F 4 Li lo Cof 1~'> tt' ii Ct bhe Y' k_-cl dW cl if Yl ir oV E? f Tl entt-s 5t•l ted I'i eY' e1 fl y thi?
pp]. i can(; rn.-iy, s w itI°i the a p pl-c-tv~ ~ ~Df the C~~-un t y Ei-lg1 ne er9 J-_-In i il
aritJ ta e w-Llla n q ~ rta. c ip ah. e a t7 a ny p ~ tit -Lclri or r es-,11 1_ttiori
whicl-~ purpoae is the formatinn of a R.--Iad Tmprcivemcnt 1Dz~~ylct
(RI D ) f or said j. m prov em ent; pur~ suan G L-wl R CW ; E:, n 8£3 q as ame r ►ri ecl e
. t
~ ~ , •
Pa Ue ~
S p c - 4 a n e Coun r y w a. l 1 not r a r tic i p a te in t he c►.-~ .--If t he~.~ e
imprc-vemeritso This> providac-ri is applicable t►_- RivErside AvenLteA
E-1 1 As an alternative methorj ----f constri_ictinq tl-ie r~-':-ad imprcivements
staterJ hereiii9 ti-~~ app1 -Lcant mayg with ttie ---Ippr-.-.v--A1 ----f tfie
Coun h:y Enqineer, yac c---Impl ish tI-ie impr-c-vemerits st.,.-Ited herein
by aoi ri i nq a nci p~.a~ ir tic i p~ tincI i n a County F1 ~ ~ d Rrojec t (CF2 R) tc-
tfi~ extcnt c-f L-fie reyitired i.mprovemeni;a 5~~----I ~.~n(M Cc-iinty wzl] r7c-It
paYtlclpatCa .11"1 tNIP C-!5t of trteSC-? .XfT1p1"i"'iVefft~'?f'lt5n Ci11.s pi`'oVisiF:ifl
a.s apF a. cable to Riversidp- Avc-~?nueo
E48 Tfie constructlcin ._-f tfie roarJway x.mproverrients stated tier-ea rl sha11
be ac r_,---mpla.shed as ~.approved I3y the ~po[ane Lr-lurity Fnqinepro
~50 The County Ei-iginPer has r1c3signated a comrner-cla L Lc-ca1 Access
stand~.~rd for- thie im~rouement -_If Ra.versa.rje-Avenue which is
ad jar.ent tu ti°ip- prcipizised dMvelcipmento ~1-his~wi11~f eai_iirE i;he
i:-t~'Jditiot-t ofi ~~pproxamately 27 fto of aspfia].t a1-.:Ing thP frontaqe
lei thEl developmen tn Dirbx ng ar7d sa.clewaD mi_tst ~..~1s,.j be
G-_- f 1s 'E r i_l Ct ed« `
E51 A1 1 requ«. red imprr--vQments ->h<al 1 conform tc- the ci_trrent, Stc-lte ---If
Washington Stanciard Spec i f i ca tic-n-; for R---,~.~d anci L-+r id ge
constructxon ar7d otheY applicable cc-Ltnty standarcls ancl/._Ir
adoptc(J res-DlI_ttl-Dn~ ~~rt~.~iiiiiig per t~.~-Lning t---I Rclad Standarcis -rind
S tormwater Manaqernen t ineffe ct at thr' d~.~a ----f u-ins tructi-on q
un1ess citherwise ,-Appr---,vE=ri lay the C-Dunty Engineer.
F55 Roaciwt..=~y st,anJardsy typa.cal roC~c1w~-xy sEactac-ins and clr~inaqe pl:qr;
Y 2 qu1L Y f? f Tl e11 t s alr E'' fc-it Il Cj 1 Cl Sp-=4a(l ~----aY Ci ~=if Cc-lI i7 t)/ Co(11 f Tl 1 S 51 lzi!l f? Y' s
res,-j1l_tta,:-n :J ;-049£3 as am r-ncl F cl and are ap p 1 z cab 1 r to t hi~
propc-sa L
E58 hl c- construc t ic-)n wc-r E i. s to ta e perfcor med wit h i ri the e%,, a. si, a. ncl 1...~ r
pr~~~ p---Ised riq ht-_If w~.~ yi_tri i: i.1 a per inai. t I-ir1 s la een i~suer1 b y the
C~~iunty Engineer a A11 woH wYth.i.n tl-16? pl_cbl )-c r-_iori ra qtit ~~~f way Ls
sub)ect t►_- znspection And appr----v,=-il by the rounty Engineer-o
E59 A1 I reqLiired c>>ristruction within the ev,.Lst.inn cir pri_ipiMiserJ pi_tb1ic
ir iLght of W ay 15 ~ ~~I be C ofil (31 et ed pY' 1 o1`' t~ ~ the Y e 1 E? a5 e f CA
bitild ± ng perma.t i.-jr a b----ricl i n an arri~~-Ltn~ estimatec.l by tfiE Gc-i_tnty
Enqineer tcl ('-DVC-'1' th(- C.--,St t--;i CoIlatt`'I_lC t]lo11 -wI)'' impr----vements Sric-tl1
be fa led witfi ttie Giji_tnty Ei-iqineero
F~J'3 App 1ic a n E sha1. 1sa. q r7 c~.nci r~.~ t_ ~~-rd 4p,--4ane C: ounl; y h! t 1 ce tc, t I-ie
!'1ibl.ac Noo 6 whir_I~ ~pecifj-c-s the fc-I11owa ngn
~ p
pc-lqe '23
TF,~ --.1Wf1t-'r (s) ciY' Si_lCCe5soY (5) 1f1 a..flteYest clQl'eE' 1:;o
autho1'' ]ze t i"i e G,.~-un t y t---- pL c,~t C E' N f ie1. 1" name~~) c-iI'1 a petit iciri f~~ir
t he fc-r m~-~ ta. oncif a R-Dad T m~rcivem p n r Li i s t ra. ct (RI D) b y t I-ie
petxti.--In methud pi_tr-sitant t-T- C:hzipter 3be80 RCWp wrilcri petitl---In
a.nc1udes the owner(is) propertyo If ta RID is f,_,rrned by esther the
petitzc-in or r~~sc-littacin metF~i-nciq as pr--►vided f~ ~r iri Gh-kpt~r %36a 88
RCW q t he ow n~ oir suc cestaor (a) furt her~.a gre4= h(1) t hat t he
.LmprcivF,ment or coristritctic-sn contemp1-itecl wa. bh.an the prciposecl R1D
xs leasilale-s (L) that the henefiLts i.c- be d~ritaPrJ ifrom tI-~~
for m~~ ~icinc-f t I-ie RID tjy t he Wrc-perty z nc1uded t herein 9 tor7 et, he r
wa.tl-i L-he --imounu ---If ariy C-Di_inty partica.pation, e,".ceeds the cost
anc~ expein a~ ----f form~ztion ~~i'l the RZDo anci c3a that ttie prope.'rty
w Lt I-iz i-I the p r~~~ pose d R.[ L? 1S a Lkf f x. cj. er)t 1 y deve1ope d o f'r rivic-! edy
furthery the --_-wrier ) c-r si(ccessor c sy stiCi1 1 r-etain the rigtitq as
i -i i _it r a. zt~ d~_~ ri der 1RC W 6n~3B a i}':j c~~ pti-i --I bj~~ ct t~_~ ~ i ~ y a~~ s m~ n t n
l;hie pr c-perty as a rPsitl t ~.--f ttie improvemen ts ca1 lc.~r_I for a.n
cc-injUncta.on wx tI-i tl-~~ formaticnn c-f tl°ie RID by either- peta.ticin or
1` (h' S:i lut 1ciI-1 (Tl E? thr--CJ i_t il CJ Ea l- c hapter 36.8e Fc.' C, Wu rh1s P 1`' oV.1 s.1 nrl 1s
applicable t-D Ha.wer<JiriP Avenuf=a
EDO There rn.-Ay e° 1-51, j_ltl Lltlesq L-x L-I-ier itndr~rgr-_-j_tnd or -.:1vP_rt~~~?,kc19
Affectznq 1:he 5LtFa)c--,cL- pr-operty9 inclLidinq prclperty to he
dendl i= ted --J1" 5 E? t r;1 s1 dFf-.`-1`' fLl ti_l l' r? C qu1. 51. lofl u ~PWE cl f l C' C cluntj/
<_Ssuf Tl C? 5 f 1ci f x naI`1 C 1 aL ola I a. gc-~ ticin f-=-Y cid)ustme! lts .1`' Y F? 11'1C.=_kt1. 0fl
reqarcl i i 7 g thF s e.- uti1 itJ esp App 1-Lcaritbhou1 d chec E w i t h t he
applicalale i_t{:x.l ity purvey-Dr ai7ci tI-~~ ~poI ane C:oun#;y Enqineer to
c1,2termane whetl-ier app1 icant ctr the i_tti1 i ty ss ir~~pr-inG>xble f----r
c.~i~ )u5tf1(ieflt oY' i''(?a oCr?tt1Loll Ci-iSts af1C~ tc, ffial Parrangements: f-=-lr afly
o
rieLe~_:'}'a1 y Wt..,rl
Speri.al Cc-jndzticins
H:iversicJe Avei-ii_te 1s an i_inmazntairtiecJ CoLinty Road, i'l Ra vc-rsicJe Aveni_te
zs ncit p~.~ved L-he applicant sha] 1 pave t---# the Pines Road per L-he
c~foremeo~tIcine-d ccfnditicins c~f capprciVrll. TFIe -ip~'Jl.a.C<=1f1t i'a,f utl.l!dE' a
pr ivate ----Ad tcl me-et access standards9 th-Ls wa.11 L7e uiscLtsseci at tl-ie
Desic1n Reviesw fdleetinq.
• ! ~ r
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-23-96/VE-7-96
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional Business (B-3) and request for Variance
from frontage requirement specified by Section 14.628.315 of the Spokane County Zoning
Code.
APPLICANT: Alfred Leichner, 11207 E. 9" Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 924-5063
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located north of and adjacent to Riverside
Avenue, approximately 350 feet west of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and McDonald
Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not
have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., August 5,1996, if they are intended to alter the DNS.
All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
By: Louis Webster, AICP Title: Planner II
Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
West 1026 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
.
DATE ISSUED: July 12, 1996 SIGNATURE: ~
QONPVIIIVM REGARDING IIWIRONIIViWI'AL OONCFRNS ARE WELOOME AT TIHE HEAARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 2nd Floor,
West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above
project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to
approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be
prepared to rnake specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning
to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Department of Health
3. Spokane County Health District
4. Spokane County Division of Engineering
5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair
7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board
8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council
9. WA State Department of Transportation
10. Spokane Transit Authority
11. Central Valley School District
12. Modern Electric Water Company
13. Fire District No. 1
.
,
AITA
ill Ir,,.l E-11 IT
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
1
~ SPOKIINE EMYiRONKNTAL OROINANCE
(MAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
~
Enviromental Checkllst
rvrpose ot Checfclist: Ftie No.
TAe State Enrirotiental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, reQulres all goverrwental agencles to tortslder the envlrorwental topacts of a proposal
before making Aetisions. An Enrironwntal Impact Statewnt (EIS) wust be prepared for a11 proposais with proba0le sfgnificant •dverse lapscts on
tAe qwllty of the envirorwent. The purpose of thls checklist 1s to providt irtforwation to he1D you and tAe aqency identify tmpstts from your
proposal (and to reduct or avoid impaCts from the proposal. 1f tt tan be done) and to help the aqency declde whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environ.entsi checkllst asks you to desCribe saae basic lnformtlon •baut yaur propossl. Governwntai aqencles ust thts checklist to determine
rhether the environmental ispacis ot your proDOSaI are slqnitltant. reQuiring preparatlon of an EIS. AnsKr the questlons briefly, with the most
preclse tnforsation knarn. or qlve tAe Dest description you can.
You mat ansver each question acturately and csrefulty, to the btst of your knowledqe. In most cases, yau should be able to ansrer the Questions
from your own obseryations or project plans Mithout the neM to hlrt experts. It you really do not know the anuwer, or if a question does not apoly
to your proposal. rrite 'do not knw• or 'does not apply.' Caqicte answers to tbe questlorts nar aay •vold unnecessary delays later.
Some Questions ask about qorermental requlattons, such u rontny. ihoreline. and lardmark designations. Ansrer these questlons if you Can. If you
hsve problcss, tAe governmentsl agencles can assist you.
TAe checklist Questtons apply to •11 parts of your proposal. even 1f you plan to do thep over a perlod ot tinie or on dlfferent parcels of iand.
Attach any additional tnfoemtlon that w111 describe your proposal or 1ts envlronACntal etfecti. The agency to rh1cA you subatt thls checklist aay
ask rou to explain rour answers or provlde additlonal tntornatlon reasonaely related to deterwlning 1f there may Dc siqnlflcant •dverse inipact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Cawplett thts checklist for nonprofect proposals, even thouqh Questlons way be answered 'does not spply•.
IN AODITIOM. ta+plett the SUP►LEMENTAL SHEET FOR NO!(PROJECT ACTIONS(Part D).
For nonproject actlons, the refvences 1n the checklist to tAe words 'pro3ect.' 'appllcaM •nd 'property or slte' should be rerd as 'proposal."
aproposer,• and 'afTecteE geoqraphlt arta.' resDtctlvely.
A. lACKGROUND
1. 'lame ot proposed project, tf appllcaple:
2. %a.e ot 401 tcant: ..E_rlLj,-~-ir.4 ~ AIFre-A Leic4.yi ev-
3. Address and phonc nuNer of app l icant or contact ptrson: 1( 2 O"'1 F- 9 T-h A v P 4p~ ~C~in P WA.!JQ2Q6,
-T-
~z9!J~9
4. Eate checklist preparee: MdrGIn 2-7T1A lqQle
S. Aqtncy re4uesting CAetklist: f7la- NJ yis! Y- S
6. Proposed tlming or sthedule (intludirtg phasing. if &pplltable):_.U4
7. a. Do you Aave any plans for future addltions, expansion. or furtMr activitr nlated to or comected vlth this DroDosai? if yes, explain.
e. Do you orn or have optlons on land nearby or adjuent to tA1s proposal? lf res. explaln.-hLQ
8. List any envlrondmntal irtfoniatton you knor about that has been pnpared. or ri11 be prepared. dtrectly reiated to this proposal.
U Yl ~Z Y1 D W 1I~
Rev.2/1 /88 I
, ~ .
lrJRAM LMAOrl911'PAL o1tDltlufCE
(vu 197- u-460) Seetioo 11.10.230(1) ~ , •
A. 6AQ,G10QSD (eontiowd)
9. Do Tw lcaov vhether appliutioos sre psoding for goMrarntal appronl• of othes propwMl• diteetl7r atfectins the property eovered bq your
proponal'. Ii yes. e:plalo.
10. Ltsc aoy 6overnmot approvaL or peraits that rill ee naded for yous proposal. it Imorn. /Q DQfbya l eT t R~ ?~?h p
~ ~re t~' c•~f" ~C- ~t ~ ` c ~1 Q I rU(i A11~ ~ctAN ~ .
~ -J
11. Cive a bcief, camplete deecriptioo of ywr proposal, ieeludlas the propoNd weo aad the •ise oi the projeet •nd •ite. "here are •everal
quentlocs Ltsr ic chis chreiclist that ask rou to dtseribe eertaia upaets ot ywr proposal. Yov do ewc o*+d to repaat those aruwrs on chi•
W6e•
. , .
S~ n lkei v- ~
1:. tocacloo of the proposal. Ctv* sufficient informtioo [or a persoa to uaderstand the peeciae loucion ot rour ptoposed proSect, lncluding a
street address. !f any, aad seecioo, tovosRip and rsnp, li knovn. It a P[OpOMl vould occur ovet • range of •tu, provtde the range or
boundaTies of cfie ai[a(s). Provide a lsgal deactipcLoa, aite plan, rlcinitT mp, aod topographle sap. 1[ reasonaDly avaiLble. Vhile you
should ruhmit acy pLor rsquireA b7r the r`anc7, rw are aoc reauired to duplieact "p• or detailed pLos svEmitted rith anr petmit spplleation
re L ced to chis eAecklioc.
~P pro 1D(-r 4X i s c,~.4- ~ ~ Q AR E R„r er s i d- i ti. S ec.IS T. Z S N, 2 4.~4- E_1nl.M .
CI,-1 CT
+AA peVlt.e) 4%t
13. Does the proposed aetlon lle vithia the Aauifer Soeritive Aru A)' Go~Tal S~wT S~rKee Area' ~~t+e ttiocliY Sever S~rvlee A~ea '.he
Citr of Spokane'. (See: Spoluae Councr's ASA OwrLr Lons %tL• for bouadariel .
-ro ac coeP.ETEn et AFrc.tcAxr
s. uNviAOmZIrI.nt a.aaxrs
Evalwtion For
Agency u.. o+ur
i. eAx-n 1
a. General deseription oE cAe ait• (elrcle e): iL lliog. hilly. rteep •lope@. souatainoue,
otl+er:
~
b. `nut is the •cNpest slope oo tlw site (approzisate ptretot slope)' O O
c. 'that aeneral t7Pes of soLls are found on the •lte (far eaatpls, elay. wsd, ssawl. post, suet)'
If 7ou Imow the cLNifiucioc of atriculcural so1L, sptcii7 thu and ooce any prim fanLod.
T- ,
d. Ate tbere wrface lodicacioos or hiscor7 ot uascable wiL in tAe tsediace ricinity! Ii w,
descrlbe.
~r e- '
~
2
. ' •SPOKANE E1IVIRONK11T1U. ORO1NAiCE
(1iAC 147-11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1) • ~ ~ •
9. E11YIR0lMENTAL EIEMENTS(tontlnued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Oely
e. Describe the purpose, type. •nd approxlmte qwntitits ot •ny filling or yn ding proposed.
Indicate source of filt. .
LA e) Y't~ '
t, Could erosion aaur as a result of clearing. construttion, or use? If so, generally describe.
J~irn
g. About vhat percent of the slte will be tovered rtth tapervious suHaces after project construc-
tlon (for example, asDhalt or Duildings)? 4 ~w`{,~•
A~A'
vk~
~ q~~ t~
A. Proposed weasuns to reduce or control eroston, or other impscts to the wKh, 4f any:
n y-A '
2. A1R
a. Yhat type of emissions to the air roulA result fram the proposal (i.e., dust, autawblle. odors ~
industrial, wood seoke) Euring constructlon and MMn the project is capleted? If •ny, • ~
9enerally describe and give approxteate Quantltes if kaarn.
~ - '
LuestAA >1P e-_Y-r_Mz1
~ llnI
b. Are there any off-slte sources of amlssions or odor that uu y affect your proposal? If so. ~
gcnerally desCriDs.
~
c. Proposed messures to redute or control emtsslons or other impatts to •ir. tt any:
~
G~~
~C A PC ~
-~I~ qt, ~
5
3, yATER
a. Surface:
(1) ls there any suNace rater body on or in the 1medlate vlclnity of the slte includlnq ywr-
round and seasonal streaies, saltwter, lakes, ponEs. wetlands)? lf yes, describe type and
proviae nawes. It appropriate. state rhat stream or river 1t tlows 1nto.
(2) Milt the project require any work over. 1n, or adjacertt to (rlthln 200 teet) the deurtbed
raters? If yes, please describe and attach avallable plans.
3
aracaM aMxoNaMExru oiaiKANM
('.tAC 197-11-960) Seetioo 11.10.230(1)
1. LIIVIRO2QQNM LI,M41M5 (eoatinued) •
Hvalwtion For
Agepcy u.e oniy
(3) Estimte the asount oi fill aed dredse ~terial tl+at vould bs pLeed in or reioved tton the
surface vater or vetLad• and lndluce the are& ot tse •ite el+at vould be affeeted. iodteate
the •arree of till mterial.
6 v► ~
(i) Yill the proposal rsquire suriac• water vitMnNls or diwrnlorr'. Give • general descrip-
tioa. purpose, and approxisate auantities. !t tawn.
(5) Does the proposal lie vithin a 100-pear flwd plain! Ii so, eot• loutica oa the site plan.
~
(5) Doee cM propowl inwlw any diseharges of vasts mterials to su[Latf vetersT If 80,
describe the [ype o[ wste aad aotieipatod rolum of dieeFurie.
~
b. Cround:
(1) Yill groundwcer be vithdrsvn, or vill vatsr pe dliclurged to arovndvater' Cive Seoeral
description, pucpose. and •ppro:i"ce Quaaci[Iss, !f Imorn.
(2) DescriDe vut• material tlut vill be discharged lnto the grwnd trom septic taaks or otlrr
sanltary vute trwwnt tatility. Deeeribe the genecal •ise ot the cystan. the numEer of
house• to be served (it applleaEle) or the aumper o[ persoos the sysceo(s) are e:pecced to
serve.
D ti► ~ ~ i c s e c,~ L r-
(7) Descrlbe any syst"s, otl+et tlrn eRose deeisoed tor the dlsposal of saoicerp vasce,
inrcalled for the purposa of disehar=loj iluid• balov the ground surtac• (loelude• eyetae snch
as those fos the disposal of scon vater os draiosse irm lloor dralos). Deseribe the cype ot
systea, the amount of rterlal to be disposed of through c!w srstes aad the t7"• ot wterials
likely co bt disposed oE (lacludin` aaterial• vhieh say •oter the nox= loadverteatly through
spl11s or a• a result of iirefighcin= aetivities).
~
r
(4) pill aar chsiuls (tepeeiallr organie wlvsac• or patroleum fusls) Ee scored le •borr b1,l.vI►-'f~ c1i.
srouad or uaderground storage taaksl Ii w, vluc cypes aod anaatities oE rteriaL vill be
•tortdl
CkjJ Sa 1
U ,
. ~
cJ
~
' arowRE n"nonMExUL oRDixANa
• (YAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) .
E. LRVIROlOKMAL LLJX?11TE (ton[Sauwd)
Evaluatioa tor
(S) What Ageac~ U~e Oaly
oroteecive ~asures vill be cakan to insure tluc leaiu or •pills o[ aey ehemicals
•tored or w ed on •ite vill not be allovad to pereolate to srouodvater (thi• includas eusures
co kup ched eal■ out oi disposal •ystes• deseribed in 3p(2) and 3b(3)'
c. Vater Runoif (including ston rater):
(1) Deseribe the •aurce of nmofi (loeludiog •ton vater) aod rtbd of collectioo and dispowl
if aay (Soclude auaatities. !t kaovn). Vtere vill t Ms water flovt Will chi• mcer ilov ioto
otAer vaters? I[ so. dsscribe.
~
(2) Jill •oy cheaicals be stored. haadled or wed on the aite !e a loutloe vl►are a•pill or
leak vill drsie to surfae• or grouadvater or to a scorm water dispoml qetam diseharging to
surfaee or grouodrater'.
(3) Could vaste wterlals enter arwnd or surface watersi If •o, 6enerally describe.
~
d. Proposed seaouras to reduee or coetrol surfaee. graund. aad evno[f water lapaets, tf aey (it
t chs propoe*d aetioo 11es vithin the Muiter Seasitive Aru be espeelally elear os axplanacioos
r relatin= co faeilities eoneeraing Seetlons 3E(4). )b(S). aod 3c(2) oi this eheeklist):
4. vuNrs ,
a. rheer or circle trpe ot vagetetion found on tl+e •lte:
doclduow tree: alder, mple, aop*n, otheT.
everareen croe: tir, eedar, pine. other. , A
.hrub..
<<.... Lj t,t, S w J.
pasture.
crop or graln. ~l ~ •
wc wil pLoci, cactall, buttereup. bellrush. skunk eabAase, other.
water plante: water 1111p. oslgrase, ailfoil. otlrr.
otlw r types ot vseetacioo.
b. Vhat kiad and amouot of w getation vill be reaowd or a1tetedT
~
c. Lise thc"ceaed or eodanger*d speeie• Imoro to be o0 or nur tbe •ita.
U~i.%,..sr
d. Proposed laadseapia`, ust of oatlw pLnte. or othet meuun• to PnNrw or enluace w=etation
on the •ite. !f aay:
s
' 5PONAK EIIYIROMMlEKTA1. qRDiNANCE
(wAC 197-11-960) Settian 11.10.23Q(t) . ' ,
9. EItYTRdItFE1tT11L ELLETtE![T5 (contfnued)
Ewluatlon Far
Agrncy Use 4nly
5. AMIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals veh#ch lrare been abaerved vn or nenr the site qr sre knawn to 4e on
ar near the site:
~
hfrds: hawk, hervn. eagle, sangb+rds, otAer: ~
nmmals: deer, bear. rlk, beawer. otl+er: 0
fish: tiass, s81mon, trnut, herring. shellfish, other:
ather:
b. List any threaptenM or endangered spectes known to be on or niur the s1tt.
EbwA 4- -G
C. ts the aite part of a migration raute? If sa, txp1atn.
~ ~ o v -1
~
~
d. Rraposed rxasures to prexervc or enhsnte rfldTlfe. if sny.
~~LP
5. EFtERGY AND 4AT3IRAL RESOURCE5
a. uhat kinds of enrrgy (electrie, natural gas. road sture, salar} r1Z1 be ulad to seet the
the conpleted projett's trtergy ncels? Qestribe whether 1t will be u3eci for heating. manufac-
turing, etC.
F. 1 G13-
h, waWld your prnject affeei the poiantial use of selar EnErgy by ad,iacent praperties? If so,
gtnerally describe.
Ii.O
c, uhat kinds of enerqy conservation fe;tures are intluded !n tht plans of thls proqvsal? List
other proposed measures to redu[e ar ccntroi energy inqatts, if any:
~r P
7. £NYIROMMEHTAL HEALT}i
3. Are there any envlromrental health haztrds, including ercposure to taxlc chemlcals, risk of flre
and explosinn. spi]l, ar hazardous rs3ts, tnat evuld otcur as a rrsult of thfs prc►posai? if so,
dtscrlbe.
(1) Orscribe special emergency ser+rices tAat Mght be requireci.
6
' sroWAM r,Mitonatrrts. omr:sARM ,
(YAC 191-11-960) Sactian 1T.I0.334(1) '
2. VR7LllO4KMT►L ELMMTTS (ctmtiaued)
trsluaiion For
Aaeac7r Use Qa1y I
E4VIR0WMtT:AL HLAL:'S (coutinwd)
(2) Praposed wr.asurrs to reduce or eoncral snrfro~ntal twaith lv►sasds, li aay:
.
b. Naise:
(1) libat t1rp~:s of aoiae e:irt la t!e axfa +►t+tch ~ra~7 aifr~cs 7/asr project (for siwpls: tesE[ie,
br
lQuipmRi, apsratfaa, ocUaes! • 1~'~~ ~LA
%
(3) wMt types wd LreU ot aaime rould bt trrsted by ar awaciated viCh thr pro}ect an a
short-term cr a 1ong-cera hasis (far e:saple» traffic. conotruttioa, operrtiaa. atlres)' IndiGaxs
VhlC 11CUis itbl;t YOM1Ad LAms fY'Oi CEi! •LCl. 7"res. rA.J a-4-'I~i ~hau r S ,
(l) Prnpased rfaoure to reduee ar consroi eoi K iwpacts, L[ rny:
~l]CL`ar
9. LA.'fb ANb 5HLIRELI?IE U5E
A. Wk►at is the tur:ant use of the slte and adjacent pxoperties? _
in c~~~S► .
b. 1Esi the •itr bEen ured for a`xiculturs.' If ra, deseribe.
C. Deacribe any strurturer an the site.
`
d. will any aYructures be d+nalisEud? II ro, +rhich?
e. Vhat i• the eurrent soaia; claosification of the ■ltei__5 0 k3 ~
f. tihat Ls tlse eurrenc cmprebeesfre pLn desi`nstion af t1x ■ite? ,~pYh1M~ C"Gl~
Lir 2&,Y` r`{
g. IL applicable, +rhat la ttrs curr:nt s'borellnt wsster progrm daaigoatioa of tbe ■f[s?
~ h. "Bas an' ptrt of Ctre site been cla"ifiad an an 'auviroamsstall> >►aerltln' artal Ii so,
■pccifr.
. ~
t " r' l~ A
I. Appro:iaiately hav man7 PeoPXr wm1d rsrids or vrorlc in cbe tasplited prpfsttT ~
19 K
. ~
~
'
, . •3~ Z"Ilomawm OlmIuwCE
(WAC 141-11-960) Saction 11.10.234(i) • , '
S. EMV'LRoMORL/lL ELUW!'S (eone3mwd)
*ralti:atlon Par
AEency Ume OaTp
j. Approzimtaly hov aanT POOPTe vould the caaplated projeet dlspLeet
k. Propcmed raasasres co avold or red+sce displac+aeet ispacts, if a071
LLOV%.. '
1. Praposed seawst• to snsssre ttre praposal fn coapatl.IsL rit'h exLstint aod prv}ae[ed land uras acd
pltsta, if aay: G~ t` ~ t7 L t! vt S__ Q'~ S D d~t:~. t~-F' !C'"n t~ vrs't Y D C] ~
~ P-M Z Q V'i
9. !i[lUSIMG
a. Approxiutelr ha+r rrory ueits rould be proTtdsd, ff amyt Indicatr rhetkkr 3►iW. atddlr, as
lew^locom hausfng.
,
b. Approxi"telr hov ranr anits, Lt aery, +rould te Klioiuated! LadirrRCe vhether hi.W. mt,ddle-. vr
lcw-isscoae houstag,
c. Prapased wiasures to redexee ar control fiouains itpacta, ii aay:
10. l18STiiE'PICS
a. ;7hut ia ihe callest hei;ht of aer prapased sscucture(a), noe including aatomaat 1n+at to chs
principal exterfer buildlag macerial{r} propessod?
1.16 'Yl 'e. t"'2 no GCl `
,
b. Vhas viev in the ioadiaCe riclalty vauld be alttred a[ obscrvc[ed t
}
c. '?raposed reatuxea ta reduce ar c4atrol asathetic iapaeta, ii sny:
u. tzcM Aaro cLARE
S. '71~-ac type of ilahx or ;1.ara viil the prbpaaaY produee? '1t~at tias of day vwXd f.t maialY ouur' i
7
4-,-d__l ~ JA 4-
LcjI"
b. Could li;ht or S,lare fc^ana tde finishsd projrct bs a saf~t7 hasard or iotrr#ere rfth v3,ersT c44'~C~ 2&4,J
c. IJhat ezistlqg oft-site ■wrtea af li=ht ar :Lry maj aifaec yeut proposal3
bil2klto
. d. lropas+e3 u"ours■ to reduce or coatrol li;ht aad glara Sap+acts, ii anys
~
~ . sZWAn mrvuoMGUrtAt. oUDur=
(VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) f
S. L11YIR0flOMl,L QJNERlS (coocinaed) • , ,
Evalwcion For
hseacy tlse Only
12. RLCREATI011
a. Vhat desigoatad and intormal reersatioosl opportuaitie• are in the lacdiace vieioit7?
9&36~
b. Would the propoNd project dispLee aop e:istin= reermtlonal uaes! If so. demeribe.
EJ n
c. Proposed wsun• to nduce or toetrol lapaet• on reersatioa. ixludiug nerucioml opportuci-
tie• to be provided by the projeet or •pplieant. !i avy:
W t-A M IP
13. pIS'.'ORIC AIfD COi.TUfAI. lRLSLRVA:ION
a. An tlr re any places or o►jeet• listed ee or Pro9oNd for aational. @cote oc loeal pToNtVe-
tioa rygiscer• kaoro to be on or ssxt co the •!te? If so, gsnecally deseribe.
N.L "
b. G necally dascribe any laodwska oT fr1AlqCo of historle arclueological, scleotific or cultural
imporcanee Imove to be on or next to the sice.
U-n -,A
c. lroposed Nan►re• to reduce or eontrol iwpacts. if sa7:
UAY, p
li. :RAt1STOR7A?ION
A. Identi[r public otrftt• and highva7r• "nini cl+e site asd deseribe proposed &ee*u co the
exiscing street qsts. Shoroo •it• pLes, lf •n7.
j hr p roia er~Y -~~r~ -S ov~ Qi~e►rsiclr 4-b."&-+ rvv►s
-l-o Mccln%Ao...lcA -4-11 evn Sou-E-k ~-d Sperac.vc Aue. civ.d
14 or + ln 4-o 6,r,oaA ci I a.y .
.
b. Is site cunenclr served Ey puplic trawit' ti eoc, vhst io the approsluce dietsae• to the
nu n st craoslt stop?
Pl Tl '2.. 1~ t o C- I L
c. flov mauy parkiog spaee• vould the empleted'toyeet Iuw2 Yov saay vould c!r proret •lideate' At
I ~
~
J AVtiAn dA
d. Vill the Oropo"l nquln aay mv rosds or etrMts. or impsovasnt• to aistins road• or •trMt@
sot lecludiog drirewyst Ii so. gmwtslly deseribe (iadicste rhotlrr publie or privsts).
~
e. Will the projeet uN (or oeeur ia the iminadiat• vltiaity ot) mtes. tail, or ai[ traosporta[lon?
If w, jenerally deseribs.
9
~ sfawn ravtzawmrrAL osni~Awz
(YAC 197-11-960) Saetion 11.10.230(1) • ~ .
E. EviR01lMTAL LLII93l3 (eoatiaoad)
Lvaluation Tor
Agenq 0s* Only
t. Rov aany whicular crip• per dor vould be geoeraced by ctti coopleted projacc' If Imovn.
indiute vden pmk vould oceur.
UYikv~oL~ ~
i ~c jG I1~~c~ t `t
ievu1 -
. ~ • ~
S. Ptoposed wasuns to reduee or eoetrol transportatine i"aets. !f any:
MQ.ld P
is. rvettc scavtcts
a. Would the proret seoult la an locrwsed sMd !or publie servlee• (tor esasple, tise protectioo,
poliee pcotsetioa, health care, sehooL. other)t If so. pnerally 8eoeribe.
~
b. Proposed seaourss to rednce or coserol direet layaet• on PuDlie "nieeo. if any:
~Qr p
16. L:ILI:'IES
a. Circle utLlitiaj curten lr avai L ble at tM site: 61 ctsieity)e~tural ~u~1G~ter~ ~tu~~
~ervice. telephone.~ian1tary sew r ,saptit srstes, othec. ~
b. Oeseribe the utilities tlut are propoNd fos the projeet. the utilit7 providing the serviee aod
the Zeneral constrvctioo aetivitias on the •ite or So the lamdiato rlclnitr vhich dght be
oeedcd.
~ ~ ln. ~ ~ YY~ ~D s r~ a v~Y S e r\/ i G e~
C. SICIIASURL ,
1. the LLAAfT/ls[1fE, ovur uader the penalt7 of perjury [hat the above respowa• are mde CrutAtully and co the bes[ ot my knorLd`e. I also
uoderstand ttuc. •hould chen be aor v111fu1 darepr*@sntation or villiul Let o[ tull diselosure oa my parc, the atenc7 mar vichdrav •ay
decerilastion ot aouAisaifieanee thac it mlght lssue in seliaae upon tdis cheekliet.
Da te : rroyootot °L Lel GN Y'
( e triot or ype) • '
Troponint Add reM sI(~ ~ Q~~y( P
5 saac
Phon.: 9 zZ- 2S 96~ .
Perwn coapletina focm: [7) [>O`ti r Ortec Z7 Zq ea
r++OVA: g 7 .016 -13 Z~
?OR 8TA" OSE 0lILT
Scatf member(a) revievia6 eheeklist: V
Dased oo t•stafi revlav of the enniroomen[al chaeklist and otlor panimec iafocmtfoa, the staits
A. Cooclude• cAac t!en are oo Prosable aignifieanc adnetse lapaets aad reeommeods a daterloatioa of wariSnifieaaea.
s• Cooeludes c!u c probable •ignificanc adwrse euviroamental lapaet• do nist Eoc the eucrent prooosai aad recornds a altisated decer-
slna[ion of aoru igaifleanee vith coodltioor.
C. Concludes that there are probabls s1gnifluat adverse eaviroaeatal lapaets and reeammeods a detecsioa[ion oi sisniiiunee.
TILIIIC ra - :75.0o
10
~ E=23=96NE=71- 6
,
' ~ M1 SS I.ON AVEt
- , . . ~
.
v L V E y~. ~c 3
. . ~ . . .
" 0 O
i i T= 0 INT 3L
O
ot sKAR ~ p _
~ a
_ _ ~ 90 o±v . ~ N
J O
x 4 S ~
~ o~s•~a r" '~S M ET AV E ` ~
aTA,L o' C ATA LDC)
a
t : o
- ~ J s~.e.~o~n, cr. ~ a-
~ y
. o0c a e M. j
WAY > g AY
~ , . ; .
EL. 2
W ti
u. o
. t. .
?~~e~:~1l~nar ; ~ ~ . :..:.`H. . h. . • . ~ ~ ~
K 1 A V ~ ALOcI v
' + WNEW
~
Live Avt
z
V
✓AY VA LL.EY WAY
.
i XCM
J I ~ I
a( t W ~ F ~ M
; ; .
, ^..A. " LL
L N ~Or
~ ~ ~ • x- RIVER51 v ~ '
EL . 9s~ ~ pa auE v.
~
• ~ . . ,
jri
~ U* PCST FFI CE • .
c
~ n 4d
IRp • ~ • ' s.a a - J - - - - ' c.
. s
4'"'`4 4 T H A V E.
.
W d
. N ~ . .
6T ac
4 v E vEwg ~ f ourt
Y z W 7ThAVE 7TN A , u
~ .
EL. 2014 _
6 T H Av E ~
.
. ~
' 9 r+ Av e T M ~
lcxr J ~
~ • ~
. ,
. . ,
~ . • 6
,
~
i
~
. ~
Q
1
~
1
y~r~~~•. s~. ~ "
~ ~ f~2d=.,,,~, •p.,;,~ . •"t~= j.,>
flK o ~
~
,
~
~ f
~
,
o
. 1
~ ~ 1 1
. ~
~ v
. ~ _ P., VER._S DE AVE
,
~
: j
;
' . t
i
i
1
r
~
i
i
{
1
i
STE P-AN.
00.
:
~
~ t
t
~
~ .
. .
, ~ . .
"?"""'ANE COUNTY 3XVISION
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZOl'~~ RECLAS5IFICATION t~~~~ICATION
PART I
A. GE~ERAg, INFORMATION:
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE A1 f*r e r1 1.,., e i c,11 h ev-
1V1AII.ING ADDRESS 1 f~? 9TH 4gLV e . Eadq
C1TY. STATE. 1b1A . ZIP q q Zo lo
PHONE q 14 - 506 3 (work) q2 z- eq&q (home)
IF APPLICANT I5 NOT O►WNEit, I1VCLUDE WRITT]EN OWr1Elt AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLYCAIVT TO SERVE AS REPRESEIVTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NANIF 5A,lv% 'e. PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY STATE ZIP
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) Aatfi5 I
ADJACFNT AR.EA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft) _jAgayi, e.
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL !4!151IS 3.4-115
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ]%.9 Z 5 !E. Rjv nr~
EMsTING zorrE cLassIFIcATIoN(s) (naTE EsrABLIsHEn)
EXISTIING USB OF PROPERTY D~-~a~.i I i~n.a► ~S~.e ra
PROPOSED ZONIlVG
COMPREHENSNE PLAN CATEGORY Ce m rn b o V nde~. r~r
SCHOOL DISTRICT r° V
FIRE DISTRICT ni !*"p I
WATER PURVEYOR M a ~ r. r vm E 1 ~ ~ .
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellmgs
Manufacttued homes Business (4-' Industnal Msxed Use
Other ( ) - Descnbe: ,
LIST PREVIOUS P G DEPARTIVIENT ACTIONS IlWOLVING THIS PROPERTY
rlgN% . C'v ' ~s ;2
B. LEGAL/ZOM It A, IFICATIO1V IIVF0YtMATI(DN.1
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 15W p /4-
SEC'Y'ION LZ TOWNSHIP 2..5; RANGE
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS iz
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD ~ O
,
ZONE RECLASSIFICA [V A.PPLICATIOR ' Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (PJIES NO
Nt3ME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS k4c dione&W !Zd *
LEGAL DESCRIl'T'ION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED
L.e+ 13 er Eiea.ns Add. i-~i e n-~ o S ne )KaLnti?
~r-
lba-4 aer-4-iad. BF-~~.e ~lerI4~ ,1z. e~"l1a~a.-~e~t
liCliaa SeAl aFc6-aA at~ je i trt ioRCe 6a,.1 ct. fea 13 O"he1 lt-i e~~h @~a~-
I ' L.a exle.atAed s _ s s a&.i ~ Ay~ .
EXISTIING ZONE(S) TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_(5
FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTZQN STA11/TPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW
IF YOU DO NOT FiOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
Q tA3 ~n p ~r'
WHAT ARE T'HE CHANGED CONDITTONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL W D9 !j.e-vrza,. l 15-3 Lone.,cl u Ne egr~,r j vN -~6r- a.rac~l
Sk2,ne.a u e. WHAT IlVIPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPFR'IIES9 5.,3 hVw.nwvA. _ v a. wek.v s 1aae. im ag bus jn&~
"e r e_ . n..,A-Cl .Lv. e. aWlkr..,r a4-n-A-ed k~ "s ne.,1 e,r- hAtA o..
Ere asw a..Ai exeov~A ~r0 e~ r+ lr O wro~ Y~ ~WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLA.SSIFICATTON7 jap. ca,.ogm-1•1.
Se-ver561 B• 3 a.v. cl~•1~ ~ e;x ta4-i %As bv~ t~1 . 5
IAn ee-+ s 4- he rea t] t W evf=U"45-AF •a L o ,n. P.
r
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IIvIPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE?
-4-k rauc. lrt 11 st. p ro cc..*s.
ZONE RECLASSIFIC, N APPLICAMN Page 3 of 4
PA1tT 11
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATTON WII.L PROVIDE THE PLA►NNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLIGANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF TFffi PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PL4►NNING DEPARTTviENT.
FHItE MAIaSHALLlFIRE IIDISTRICT
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~ B ADEQUATE A,RRANGENiENTS JMM) NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILTI'sES FOR FIItB
PROTECTION PURPOSES
C RECOMNMNDED FIRE FLOW I~~ , OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT D . AND WII.,L BE DETEfi.1mIIVED AT BUILDING PERMTI'
A►PPLICATION TIlViE
ID REQUIREMENTS INGLUDE
F'l~~ ( c3 -ol7- 96
FIItB DISTRICT SIGNA DATE
wAaER PuRVEYOit
A. SATISFACTORYAT MW S FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQ S (~AVE) O~ BEEN MADE
B REQ S/CO
~
r 1 r
T C
7-
~
WATER DISTRIGT tIGNATURFII'TrLB DA
- . - _ _ , - - . . - - - -
- - - - - - _...COiTN7'Y ENGIr1]EER
A PRELIIv~IIlNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAICEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIRENiENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT
A CO1ViMENTS.
C6
SIGAIA E DATE
- _ . - - f7
- - - -
. couNTY -uTILITaEs
A PRELIlViINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAC,E AND GUfERAL REQ S FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HA I VE) i~ N0T) BEEN SATISFTED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE YS
~
A COMVENT'S. %~AA/-Ab
SIGNA DATE
- - - HEAI.TH DI,STItICT
A PR;F:LMMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN P G !RAL REQ S FOR
SUBNiITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAI. (HAVE) r(MHAN~ENO BEEN SATiSPTED.
t1 COMMENTS: jp,Gl.` ,S'e4Ad- TtiAZ
,7 Y
SI&ATURFJI'I'I'LE DATE
SEVVEgt PUItdEYOIt
A PR;ELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQ S FOR THE
PROVISIOAT OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY T'HE APPLICANT.
A COMMEIV'I'S: IL
Z q 15&
~
SIGNA DATE
w 4J ' •
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' Page 4 of 4
PART IH
o,.5 E SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ~
A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
. I, THt
j ZONIING MAP AND WRITI'EN LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION
:
a~
• r O
s~F 967
DATE 3 ~Zs r~~
4- Al
~NAL $ M.9 PHONE 9 _fb-(3Z.Z
EXPIRES 717~ ~ ~A 23P s9 Z_ ~'Z
SART Y V
.
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OVVNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I,1'HE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR A►FFIIZM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTBFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A►FFIltM THAT I AM THE OVfTNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDEIVTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNLR, ATTACHED
HEREWI'TH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
NAME &~FA DATE
ADDRESS~ ~~0 vZ 4~= . E4~ r44&F ` PHONE
40
21P v
~ P13;
~ ~
3
SIGfi1ATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATNE ~ r nATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFHZNMD BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
,t:5' GIn- , 1996, BY A l-rr ecl E.Lemahne. tr-
~
.
N
Notary Pubhc in and for the State of Washington IK" fX '110
Residing at 5 12in Y:mm,i~ C,
My arromtment exrues. T" 149 S
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY TFE DMSION OF BUII.DING AND PLA►NNING)
DATE SUBMITTED. FILE ZC' a 67/6
DATE ACCEP'TED. BY:
TOTAL FEES• RECEIPT #
. ,
, ~ .
b!'t)KANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
AIPLICA'TIONS BEFORE TNE ZONINC AD ILTS'I'OR
Name of Applicant ~~~r"'e'=::7Agent Y N
,
StfeCt A(jdI'C$$ <<r
7.i Phone - Home ~ _z7U~- ~
City • ~~'~f~ State• ~C `i Ce ae/ i.G04~> Work
Agent's No
Name of Property Owner(s) ,16 r-T-~ f l '/,-'k ~ X ; /6f'/,/.~'i~
Street Address• yZJ 7 L,~;
~ . bP , Y_hpe - Home
City State. Code ~ Work
REQLJESTED ACTTON(S) (Circle appropriate acdon)•
r
Vanance(s Condiaonal iJse Permit Expansion of a
b-flier Nonconforming Use
FUIt S'I'AFF [JSE ONLY '
Violation/
Sectioi) 1~ 3 Township ' Range, Enforcement Y N
~-y
-Fire Distnct• -CWWP sewer purveyor
-CWSP water urve or l 1 i 1`1, It - I
p y CUP standards met. Y N,NA )
-Exisdng zone 1' % L °Cite applicable section:
-Comp. Plan designadon< (Aji ► ► J1.1'' f I 11iArtenal Road Plan designation IL)
°Cntical Areas Wetlands Habitat 'l
, ' ; Geologic tl" ; Aquifer l' / , and/or Flooding ~--Lot, legal & add'1 ownership checked by• 14/1 -Person doing preapp conf
-Other/previous Division of Planning achons invoiving this property _
SEPA complete application date,
-Certificate of Exempbon No . Application No
•Heanng Date -Variance sUe plan dimensions checked byf
AI30iJT 'H'HE PItOPEIt'H'Y (by applicaeet)
*Existing use of praperty•
-Descnbe proposed use of the property, noting chanEe from'exlsting use':
*If a vanance applicahon, state the Code standard and describe the variance souLyht in comnarable terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet)-
/.S~' ~ ~'/'l`i'r1 `'f/ ~~l l ~S- ~l~ ~~=~'~~l~,L,~G'C~~~ r~G`~.-~~~ •;'-{/~'~c_ 7'_
~~L~~/~ C.=~:}~C~/ ,~'t=/~L-~iJ _T"'7~.~~/`•E3..3~ ~.~~/i~f~C~- ,~C' ~~'~~?'/~'~~~~i~~
•If a condidonal use pernut application, does propos meet a!a standards? Y(14)
If not, has one or more vanances been requested? N
-If HONE INDUSTRY, has consultaaon occurr vnth Division of Buildings regard.ing
construcdon of building for intended use? Y
-,What is the size of the subject property. I At (2,2. 0-,W. Fr.
*Street address of property (if known)• Mq z s E. a.►.d er s a Si e_
*Legal descripeon of property (include easement, if apphcable) s a,.~a.c,~, ~ Leq►T_
*Pazcel No(s) • 4;S'15
-Source of legal. r s. re.an
-Total amount of adjoimng lan controlled by this owner, sponsor and/oi agent .w,!ftw a
-What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? ow v% e. r
STATE OF WASHINGPON ) SS
C'OUNTY OF SPQKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY UF PERNRY, TNAT (1) I AM THEE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZEU AGENT POR THE
PROFOSED SITE, (2) IF NOrI' THE OWNER, WRTITEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUTHORLZiNG MY ACITONS ON
HIS/HER BEHALF LS ATTACHED. AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RFSPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTIJG DOCUMENTS
~
ARE MADE TRUIHR7LLY AND'PO THE BFST OF WLEDGE 9 " 7
Signed ~(aefa@ Z)";r
eooeooe
Notary Public in and for the state of W~hin
, My appa~►tm exp=*. c~ m
page 1 of 2
IiD2A APP (REV 4193)
~do
~~aOpO~~"0° ~
p~~~eo0
,
f H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or uiterest be served7 es No
Explai.n: c~ln.~ v,o t~ ~lrt ei
~ ' .
120 s 1 A ~ 21a. a►.. " (G, s+r ee-E
1. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the
5~ject property? es No
Exp1Si11:
,
h~~a _ho~r-~~ael bustv~e.sscs w~+tc, -~1z~4 busit+~e.~~~ .
p. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the pridileges of a diffesent zone
c l a s s i£ ic a t i o n ( m o t h e r w o r d s w o u l d t hiss b e a d e f a c t o z o n e c h a n g e)? es No
Expl,ain:-rke, bu <iv~ ~ c~ "AA- I-a, -Mr►.e~ ~ i sVn.A ~eu-du►i,~c~,
~l9 ~ L N► r+_S ~ ~r- .~c.LStt'~ Z ~,n. P.
K. Will tbis variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
ExplalII:.Ru4-. 44p2 Gow,-prr.6.~►s~.t
L. Is this dariance required for a reasonable economic retum from the subject
prapertrty or as the existing structure too small? eVe No
z, • ' "
Q6v.ybPo_ 7► +0 L.COO•6e 11ti sbIOiI%w~ a M. Did the rnactical difficultv which caused you to apply for this variance exist
before you ovdned the subject property? Yes
ExplaiII: ~~r ~ e.. s a ea, v.~c~, -~4 a.,v►,~. bt~0 t Id i v~
,
.r.. - , , .
r e
. N. If approded, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist
to protect the Rathdruaa/Spokane Aquifa'1 Yes No
Explain: T'~.r. :ca=~ ex-1-,r -'u~liLl se we-y-
o_ _
The following spacetis for fiwther explanition. Attach an addidonal page(s) if needed.
You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of this
applicatione We have the equipment w display video tapes. 1Vo such addidonal mattmnnal is required
and ia any case it nnust be BRIEF and descripdve of issues which need to be considered in relation
to this requested variance. If you have quesdons about the procedure to bc followed feel free to
contact the Spokane County Division of Planning at 456-2205.
ED-vaRMcB,euRM oPMooFPOxM Page 2 of 2
xsv: 40s
Y
♦ o •
VLaRI!'1NCE BURDWl Y VF PROOD" FORIYY
!
Name:
File Number• 10 r -I 'i
A"variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the appllcadon of the spedfic
regulations of the zoning classificadon for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This
property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classificadon This adjustment
remedies the d.ifference in pnvileges A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in
the zone classification in which the property is located.
The following quesdons will help to deternune the outcome of your request Your request requires
accurate and coYnplete responses. Fust circle either the yes or the no answer(s) following the
questions below as they apply to your situadon and then explain as needed (in the space provided)
to malce your unique situadon clear Certain phrases from the Zoning Code of Spokane County
section on variances are included in these questions and are underlined for convenience.
A. Will this variance pernut a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes
Explain: ~~L Z g o 1 S ~~c Gro~ e. sl~e u lcl l~ ~ n v~ o.
~ ~I l G
5at-Z--- Ar ~oa. e~ Prltnci~d,.l 1,4
A
' Y !
B. Are there special circum, t ces (lot size, shape, topography, location,(access)
surround.ings, etc.) which apply eo ehe subject property and which may not
apply to other properties in the ? <jD No
is
Explain:Acc-J=;5 ti.e„ a' B a,I ,~cr--~e5,30 s
h~,.~` e► -~~e.ivr a►. r-_sS eF-F7mF-S12vi-4 je A~ye . 1l,:.g i~-~-~►e~v o~a~.ce,ss
C. Is the subject property &vrived of n~ rivilegrs commonlx en,ioved b, oy ther
' in the y~i inity and in a5imilo.r zone Slassification? Yes No
Explain: -Y,..~r 44,` s b u si v,& s S u4-rr e Q,n apre.,a u e. u, P. w eI2 l cA r., +
nLce e. cA "i sv a.x i a►..v% c e. .Y
rA 4- P n r.ac + ~O G466 cr+k e r
L
D Will this variance be harmful to the public welfare or to other properties in
the and asimilar zone classification? Yes CO
Explain: i e- 6v~ 1Ar s S 4-1ie i r
.v%.~,4 r~. f 1l~WL~V-cl U~ cx.v6 ~ e► ~.4~.-~„4 •
i~iwi
E. Are there other sinular sit tio s in the in al'm.~'1a r zc~ne cla~ ' cation7 CYe No
Are they permitted uses? Y s~ No Are they "nonconfornninE"~m? Yes No
Explain: 71 r-~y- i s o~ e 61-1ReY 6u s t v► efis o,rt e-v-siAM i v~ a.-
51 v►~L.I a,„v Zo w e4-'%h,o...-~ i S Der vv~ 14- 1Qc. e'.1 ~ 11' LG.[.j Lz.ll i 1/ I' (1.%)..) lA f
~('r
F Could the subject property be put to j a reasonable and ~permitted use by yv i or another r~► ~~~!►~'r r
person without the requested vanance? es No
Explain: _BA2+ -6 e- -Le~~~ e- b. a, s n,o u--)
..=zv e~ e- \g-~ a--y? c- e.
G If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmeneally
sensidve, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic propertyYes No
.
Explain: -J... -v i S
,
Page 1 of 2
r
A. ~iJ~EN OF PRuuF fortn(s) (b3' iPPflncint)
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representadve to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument m favor
of approving the apphcation. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria wluch the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your application.
SIGN-OFF B'Y COUNTY DEPARTMEN'H'3 AND OTHER AGENCgES
(aPplgcant must dasit each agency whose no. is circlecl below)
SPOKANE COUNTY HEAI..TH I2ISTRICI'
Proposed method of water supply:
b) Proposed method of sewage d.isposal: ~~h 40-
A prelimuiary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The apphcant has been uiformed
of requuements and standards. We request consultation with Division of Planning Y N
~ e 94 AoY;/ /f 94
(siSna ) (Dabe) (sign-off VVaived by Planning)
2. SPOKANE COUNTY I)IVISION OF BLTgI.IDINGS
FOR HOME INDUSTRY OIVLY: A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the
proNsal. The applic t has been informed of requirements and standards for the building, based
pon e pr0p4sed s
4~_Qll 04*Am / (90W
(Signa';=) (Date) (Sign-off WaiVeoy Plannmg)
3SPOKANE COUNTY IDIVISI0N OF Eli1GINEEltING & ROAI)S
preli.minary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of req nts an d standards. ~ryrequest consultadon with Division of Plannmg. Y N
C~~
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
4. SPOK~IE COUNTY i)Y`~][SIOl~ OF gJ?'II.1CI'~S (Division of Planiung may waive
if outside WWMA)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been uiformed
of requirements and standards.
~
9-V_4_1 a44_~_
~ •
(Signature)Y ate (Sign-off Waived by Plannuig)
The applicant is requued to dLscuss the proposal wnth d[ON~'!W
to become informed of water systegn
requirements and standards. (See #a below)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal vcnth
to become informed of sewage desposal
requirements and standards. (See #b below)
,
a a WATEIt PIRVEYOIt: IIJ
kAA
1) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our future service area.
2) The proposal is/is not located vvitlun the boundary of our current distnct.
3) We able to serve this site with adequate water.
4~JSatisf inents b n made to serve this proposal.
{sr_
(Signature (Date) b o SEWERAGE PUItVEYOR:
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been
uiformed of require nts and standarIs.
(Si,ture) (Da4) `
~0~eeeeoomaaa~e
om~` ~ .~di •o~m -
a4e ,.oo..o~~ am~
.
mo ~~J w,
.
~ ~y~ O
` s g ~Y V14 op.
r'
m m
mAuq
o elCp•,e ~.~~r~
FIDrLA APP R~ 4I95 ~i~ PaSe 2 of 2
)
~~mooo
~
PAGE 1 15 13:23 04 APR 1996
Road# Road Names. MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info .
04170 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00 000 WEST END TO MAYHEW R U 19 GR.AVEL 40
RIVERSIDE AV 00 010 MAYHEW RD (END) U 19 GR.AVEL 40
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 160 EVERGREEN RD U 19 PAVED 40
04244 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 HARMONY RD U 19 PAVED 40
RIVERSIDE AV 00.130 MCMILLAN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 210 HOLIDAY RD U 19 PAVED 40
04167 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 HUTCHINSON RD (START U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 060 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
04168 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 30
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 090 GILLIS RD U 19 PAVED 30
04169 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 32
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00.120 HOUK RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
04171 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 GRAVEL 60
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00.050 ADAMS RD U 19 GRAVEL 60
04172 RIVERSIDE AV (STAR.T) 00.000 ADAMS RD U 19 GR.AVEL 30
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00.130 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 GR.AVEL 30
04173 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 CONKLIN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00.120 CARNINE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04188 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00 000 BOWDISH RD U 19 GRAVEL 14
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 070 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 GRAVEL 14
04223 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 DYER RD U 19 GR.AVEL 24
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00.170 THIERMAN ST (START) U 19 GRAVEL 24
04241 RIVERSIDE AV (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 GR.AVEL 18
RIVERSIDE AV (END) 00 100 MCDONALD RD
04174 RIVERSIDE AV (LIBERT 00.000 GARRY DR (LIBERTY LA R 09 PAVED 40
00 170 WRIGHT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
00.240 MITCHELL DR (LIBERTY R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
12 Records Processed
!
Tra f f i c Cdunt s•
Road Name . Location . Leg Count.
SPRAGUE AV at FANCHER RD E 21824 SPRAGUE AV at FANCHER RD W 22250
S PR.AGUE AV at DOLLAR RD ( END ) E 2 9 4 0 5
SPRAGUE AV at DOLLAR RD (END) W 33611
S PR.AGUE AV at TH I ERMAN S T ( END ) E 27091
SPRAGUE AV at THIERMAN ST (END) W 34555
SPRAGUE AV at PARK RD E 31843
SPRAGUE AV at PARK RD W 30029
SPRAGUE AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH E 25530
SPRAGUE AV at ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY SOUTH W 34623
SPRAGUE AV at DISHMAN-MICA RD (END) E 27800
SPRAGUE AV at DISHMAN-MICA RD (END) W 12904
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft E of FARR RD E 29514
S PR.AGUE AV 105 f t E o f FARR RD W 2 4 7 7 3
SPRAGUE AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 24798
SPRAGUE AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 23381
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BOWDISH RD E 31079
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of BOWDISH RD W 26207
SPRAGUE AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) E 26778
SPRAGUE AV at SR-27 (PINES RD) W 19612
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of MCDONALD RD E 20614
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of MCDONALD RD W 21573
SPRAGUE AV at EVERGREEN RD E 17980
SPRAGUE AV at EVERGREEN RD W 16982
SPRAGUE AV at ADAMS RD E 15650
SPRAGUE AV at ADAMS RD W 17355
SPRAGUE AV 105 ft W of SULLIVAN RD E 19850
S PR.AGLTE AV 105 f t W o f SULL I VAN RD W 13 317
SPRAGUE AV at FLORA RD E 12182
S PR.AGUE AV at FLOR.A RD W 12979
SPR.AGUE AV 105 ft W of BARKER RD E 02279
S PR.AGUE AV 105 f t W o f BARKER RD W 0 2 0 6 0
SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) E 3801
SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) W 2413
S PR.AGUE AV ( START ) at HAVANA ST E 17130
SPRAGUE AVE at VISTA RD E 39077
SPRAGUE AVE at APPLEWAY AVE E 03650
S PR.AGUE AVE ( END ) a t HENRY RD W 170S
SPRAGUE AVE (LIBERTY LAKE) at LIBERTY LAKE RD E 2908
SPRAGUE RD at RR TR.ACKS E 18
SPRAGUE RD at WOOD RD W 13
I
'
Traf f ic Cdunts •
Road Name. Location Leg Count
MCDONALD RD at SALTESE AV S 2679
MCDONALD RD at 16TH AVE N 02646
MCDONALD RD at 16TH AVE S 3575
MCDONALD RD at 8TH AV N 8281
MCDONALD RD at 8TH AV S 6717 i
MCDONALD RD at 4TH AV N 10555 MCDONALD RD at SPRAGUE AV N 06528
MCDONALD RD at SPR.AGUE AV S 9100 ~
MCDONALD RD at BROADWAY AV N 04364
MCDONALD RD at BROADWAY AV S 05622
MCDONALD RD 55 ft S of MISSION AV S 03638
MCDONALD RD at WELLESLEY AVE N 00306
MCDONALD RD at WELLESLEY AVE S 01526
MCDONALD RD ( STAR.T ) at 2 5 TH AV ( START ) N 0 2 7 5 9
MCDONALD RD ( STAR.T ) a t SR - 2 9 0 (TRENT AV ) N 02143
,
ii
~
' w • ,
. •
S P O K A N E O U N T Y
~ C .1 rl:, _~it s.:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AiVD PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department
Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility
Greg Figg, Department of Transportation
Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council ~E C C rV ED
Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority
Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board
Central Valley School District
Modern Electric Water Company -
Fire District No. 1
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE. . Apri13, 1996 l
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR3.5) and
Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional Business (B-3) for those uses allowed
in the Regional Business (B-3) zone (no site plan).
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVEEW MEETING
APRIL 17,199 2:15
(`'OUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE R.QOM, 2NA FLOOR
PIeBSe teV1eW tlle abOVe appi1C8t10II 1rid L1SC tlle a1taChed APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN
REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages
your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend.
If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached fonn to Tammy
Jones for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will
be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file
(so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions
about the application, please contact Tammy Jones of the Division of Building and Planning at
456-2205.
c: Alfred Leichner, 11207 9th Avenue, Spokane WA 99206
Attaehments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan
1026 WEST BI'.OADwA1' AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
BUILDI\G Pf-{ONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
I'[.AN`1Nc PHOUE: (509) 456-2205 • Fnx: (509) 456-2243
TDD: (509) 324-3166
~
~ .
• - • . w • .
Design Review for April 17, 1996 at 115
Zone Reclassification for Alfred Leichner
Generally located north of and adjacent to Riverside Avenue,
approximately 350 feet west of the intersection of Riverside Avenue and
McDonald Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range
44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Major Commercial and within the Priority
Sewer Service Area (PSSA)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban "
Residential-3.5 (UR3.5) and Neighborhood Business (B-1) to Regional
Business (13-3) for those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone
(no site plan).
PARCEL NLJMBER: 45153.4115
SITE SIZE: Approximately 13.659 square feet
APPLICANT: Alfred Leichner
11207 9th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99206
(509) 924-5063
ASSIGNED PLANNER: Tammy Jones
~ . , t . . , .
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I
A. GENERAL INFORMATION;
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: A 1frr act L c i c.lther .
MAII.ING ADDRESS: H7.6 ? -igTH Av e.
CITY: STATE: W,A ZIP: 9 9 Zo (C
PHONE: 9 24. - Sbb 3 (work) 9 2 z- 54b4 (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:
MAII.ING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE .aREA (acres or sq. ft) l T<o 5 9
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) 61 o Vn. c. ' ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECTlPROPOSAL 4!5 l 5 3. a- L 19_; •
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED ww. e
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 129 2 5 E. R~v e r 6 i~ ~
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE FSTABI.ISHED) J3 -1
EXISTIING USE OF PROPERTY D &4ak. i 1 i1n.a► tS1w o
PROPOSED ZONING M - 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Ce w%rn a r ~ i a.1 / u r b6..vn bev nda. Y~r
SCHOOL DISTRICT
FIRE DISTRICT
WATER PURVEYOR _M o A a r n~ Ic G.
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Business (4-' Industrial Mixed Use
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IIWOLVING TH1S PROPERTY:
t.4n..y%~
B . LEGAL/ZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 45 w 1/4.
SECTION L5 TOWNSHIP Z,,S RANGE
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: R i,r c, r s i d er
WIDTH OF PROPER'I'Y FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 0
. ~ _ .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION, Page 2 of 4
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (11MS NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS tjc d r„n o,. lsA f~ d..
LEGAL DESCRIP'I'ION OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED.
Ln + 17A e~F E_o.v~ ~ r-L4i-~i e n-~ o S oe ka.h e Co u vt4:4, a. s e c r P/ Q.4
-}r k c,r c oI:' rr-cc r d ftcl i'vn Ve I t! vtR G 3 04:' s.pa.a e 47: Toa t40 r
Wi4l. A4ta-4 ver-k-iev. e-Elhe Nor~6 ~j-r-e-FVaCa..-~eA RivdYSidp. Avt .
lYtmc, sem 4-k drFa." aA~oiv►ivto sa.id lm4 13 dhd l.jima Wes4 ef lhe Eas~-
I"wl ef- LgT "7 Cj4Gh8flCI sx-re SS . i-4 AVet •
E)CISTING ZONE(S)_~- ~ TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_Q' ~
. FOR THE FOLLOWIlNG DESCRIBED
PROPERTY. (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIP'TION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE
BELOW.
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _
~ld~ 1R lr'
WHAT A.RE THE CHANGED CONDI'I'IONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WA►R]2ANTlED? ~m-y~ ra. l B- 3 Zcwvt acl u re ny e r~,Ti ~ n.irec.~
1 v~ G~.s d i vtq .6k L u 6 e. k3u ~-i4l
S u Y'e,.a v e. a. .,1 M c~ j c> >n d l dWHAT IIviPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT
PROPERT'IES? U h V, wn w tn. . u 44n e. iw ha. S a.. vsdas 1mee-r~ o. btss k e.t~
4.k e r e. ei- wo►. A 4- h e oua we- r b T ~G cl ~.G S K rti! G r ha.c1 0.,. G a. MO I4.1~
,
s.ce.v.uro e eT4Y a wl► cr s.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? 13 G t o.t's a c-1•k e i r n. r
cv a rv.. l B- 3 Z o~►. e~ ivn ~%r- Qr Go v. .-~.1. r- ~ x► s~- ~ v~ 4 b ~ 4~ n_ s~s
Lte_eL+s -lL k e r Caci I re-vv~l= wA S a-~ -~k e, 13 -3 Zo n. t
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON
SUR.ROUNDING LAND USE?
Se v.,~ . cx c_ o4- -Wh o se, 4-ks..4- -r k e c_ ou V%.~~r rvv i I -w..n e.
44i.~_ rDuc,1~ ~-11 U,►~c c ~ s s f
i
' 1 . . • '
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4
PART II
THIS SECTTON OF THE A.PPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLA►NNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITI'EN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENT'IFFIED. RE'SULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNIlVG DEFARZMENT.
FIRE MARSHALLIFIRE DISTRICT -d-- ~
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECT'ION DISTRICT NO. I B. ADEQUATE AR,RANGEMENTS jUJ31XE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACII.TITES FOR FIIZE
PROTECTTON PURPOSES. r
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: ( 80 ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINTITVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUII.DING PERMIT
APPLICATION T1ME.
D . REQiJIlZEMEN'TS INCLUDE:
~ r3 -a-7 - qL
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATLqZEIITILE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY S FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQURREMENTS ="(HAVE) (HAVE OT) BEEN MADE.
B . REQUIREMFNTS. ~r c~ ,.P G~ ~
014 r ~-tC
47 -
WATER DISTRICT $IGNATUREMTLE DA
COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROA.DS
AND DRAINAGE HAYB BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMVIENTS:
C6
igi-to 3
SIGNA DATE
o~
COUNTY UTILITIES 4410"
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQ S FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) VE NOT~ BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS ~-e.~
i
A. COMMENTS: A4
L
SIGNATURFIITI'LE DATE
HEALTH DISTRICT E1W~
A PRELIlViINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PL ENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) QHAVE N~T BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS: P'/9
. SIfiNA DATE
SEWER PURVEYOR '
~
A PRELIlvIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A . COM]1iEN'TS: ,
_ ~ jz g /i &
~SIGNAWRE4
fI'I'I'I.E DATE
. . 1 .
• ~ , •
.
. . „ .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' Page 4 of 4
_ = = = -
PART III
~
a~,ES.. E.
..SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, Tilt A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
, E-Q ZONIING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTiON.
;
• , ' a;
O ^
9 y~ DATE: 3 j Z8 I9~='
C S 0.9 R2-ew( P H O N E: 9 ? f Q - t 3 Z Z
EXPIRES 711v 577 Q'-4 Lr. A. ZIP• 99 z I Z
PART IV .
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETMR OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR A►FFIltM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF'THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENI'IFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WIZI'ITEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER
BEHALF.
NAME: `1:~+1- ~ C-"Y ~ • ~ --~ey~~~Z ' DATE: 31vo ~v
- ~ h3
ADDRESS: r PHONE:
ZIP:
~
SIAPPLICAN'I' OR REPRESENTATNE PATE
STATE OF WASHIINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFTRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
ma-r c.1~. , 1996, BY A 1E"r Intcl E. L c I c h n t 4--`011N11/11I8~~
M. ly •k►,
.
.0
Nq~ b
/IR1I : =
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
_ ~ pUBUC t 2 ~ .
~Y `~e: ~0. Residing at: ~ 01~~.. vt G
0•N'•'~~d~~ My appointment expires: T"
~iWAg~~~►
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DIVISION OF BUII.DING AND PLANNING)
DATE SUBMITTED: FII.E
DATE ACCEPT'ED: BY: .
TOTAL FEES: RECEIP'T .
, • ~
~
1
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF
BUILDING AND PLANNING
zaNE REcLAssIFIcATrON APPLICATIoN
PART I
A. fIENE1tAL INFQRMATION:
NAME oFAPPLacArrr/REPxEsErrrATIVE: A1 F'~ nA
MAIL,ING ADDRESS: t 1 ZC~ -9 T W 4,v e. -
CITY: e,. S"T.A'I'E: W~ . ZIP: 9 97~0 (o
FHC}NE: 9 Z.4- - S(36 ~ (wark) 9 2Z-- S$69 (home)
IF AFPLICANT IS NUT UWNER, INCLUDE WR.ZTTEN UWNER AUTHORIZATION
FQR AP'FLYCANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL 4WNER'S NAME: 54,,, m,e.. PHQNE:
MAILING ADDRL55:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PRC►JEC"TlPROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 1 1 91669
ADJACENT AREA OWNED QR CQN'I`ROLI,EA (acres or sq. ft.) In v~. e,
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PRQJECT/PRQPOSAL 461 fi 3.A- 1 19;
ASSESSOR FARGEL #'S OF ADJ'ACENT AREA QWNEI7 pR CQNfiRQLLED
STREET AIJDRESS OF PROPQSAL EXISTING ZONE GLASSiFTCAUON(S) (DATE ESTABL.ISHED)
EXISTINCx USE OF PROPERTY
PR(]FOSED ZONIlrI'G ~3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAT'EGORY Co w► rn, u~~,,.,n bot.] nd_ ~
SCHQQL DISTRICT' r
FIItE DIS"I'RIG'T Di S+
WATER P[JRVEYOR M o~_~ t r~ E!e. G,
PROPOSFD USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured hoanes Busincss Industnal { ) Niixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Deseribe:
LIS'T PREVICMUS PLANNING DEPARTNfENT ACTIC}NS IlWOLVING THIS FR(]PERTY:
B. LEGALIZUNE REC ASSIF~(';ATY F R . ION:
LC3CATIQN OF PR+DPOSAL; '5W 1/4-
SEG"I'tUN Ls TQWNSHIP 2-15 R.ANGE
NAME OF PUBLIC RQAD(S) PRdVIDING ACCESS; S~,c~ e.
WII)T'H 4F PRQFERTY FR4NTING 4IV' FUBLIC ROAD:
.
r ~
. 7RMIT CEN"I tl& PASSPORT'
Datc: Numbcx:
\ i
Name phono '
Addross
,
Canments:
CUSTOMER ROUTING
Division of Buitding & Planning Division of Build1ng dc Plam►in
JL..~. . ~y~Y • . :1~ ~ •:.1'.~•. V.LYf.:
4 ........r
C~i?:;}:iY:~i: i:t~$i$$;}::l•~ J~.~}}•'i:{•$::~:{+i}i. r ::.;.;:j}7'}'.>~~}:: }Yr},•: }??i:•?i}:{•~:•}i:-:•}?>:•}}?:•:~$ i.~:\:}}};:{<;::::{•.v~ •ti•f:~hv: •r
4: :w::: •
y~?~~ ~ ?:$}.'•.`•Y{? • .r ~,~1 +,.1,.. r,• , • ~r
. . .
.
.~:Tf~.(~•.~Y:: }:•f:':::.•..\~J~•~}• V~ Y:-0'J: }.titiJ{ •.1~. •
~ • . .
. . : r.
• Y•i ~ti•5h~: . i y,v,•}; C.ir ~!i:$y:
t. . K. i~~S{~r
..,,e~'J?~fi;. ~~~~~~~~k•.`•~ ti::i::;:>:; y .-~Y~'~l:.; . .
n...
• . . • . , r....~x• r........,..:...::~
FlAddressing ~ Admin. Exccp6at ~ Appcwch Permit
FIBuilding Permit ~ Arterial Rd Plan Info ~ Flood Plain Pamit
R Code Information ElBinding Site Plan Info ~ Public/Privatc Roads
FICommercial Review E]Cat of Exanp6on a Rea. Bldg Permit Rev.
FIConference ~ Comprdhensive Plan ~ Site Drainagc Iafo
n Enagy Code Info ~ Cond. Uso Permit ~ Subdivision Revicw
FIFire Safety Review FINonconforming Uso ~ Utility Permit
FlManufactured Home FlPermit Review ~ Zone Change Review ~~5~3_ q'1 S
~ Mochanical Pamits ~ Shorclincs Info ~
~ Ottxx Permits ~ Short Plat Info ~ NO FEE REQUIRF.D
~cviewa Time out
F]Plumbing Permits ~ Subdivision lafo
o Pr;vate Road Info El Tanp. Use Permit } ~ti.:...
FIResidential Review ~ Veriance Appt. ~ APA Payment
~ Sewa Pumib ~ Zane Chock ~ Cut. of Exanp6on
~ Infonna6on F]Zane Info ElSubdivision Review
n ❑ULID/Sewer Info
n ~ _ . ~ Zone Change RevieW
n
n -1 NO FEE REQUIRED ' NO FEE REQUIRED
Reviewa Time out Reviewa T'uno out Reviewa T'uno out
w►378wnsspoRI.cM visM
RECEIPT SUNIIKARY '
~ ~ w ~ ' `
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9600516 DATE: 03/28/96
APPLICANT: ALFRED LEICHNER PHONE= 509 924 5063
ADDRESS: 112075 E 9TH AVE
SPOKANE WA 99206
CONTACT NAME: ALFRED LEICHNER PHONE= 509 924 5063
TRANSACTION: REZONE - ENGINEERING, LAND USE ACTION REVIEW
DOCUMENT ID : 1) 2) 3)
4) 5} 6)
COMMENTS: PARCEL N0.45153.4115
FEE & PAYMENT SUNIMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00
LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00
TOTAL DUE = 220.00
TOTAL PAID= 220.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
03/28/96 00002315 1051 220.00
PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA
THANK YOU
1
' • . . ~ 9 ~ 1 30~'
19~'
c~~__~- s•-• a J r . ♦L j t. ~ A
J ^ . ' J ~ y ~ o►:.^.r.~^~ ~Y
w ~a i J1 ' ~ ; ; ~ : ► j .
\,cI'Il..j
` JL
f"'~s- •t~ -;1 S • a r ~ i ~ - ~,..~i+cri.►,~:.
V " ~ r•' Y • . 1 ~ u ! ~ ~ 1 . 1• ~ 1 J,+ . • ' . .
d„ t . 1.: 't f~'„1`~ ` j C.i~•i~) , ~ r ~
40 Z ` ~ ~ ~t
~ ~ ' ~ P' 2 . Y'„''~ Z ; i '':'8 :r . y .
' ;s ~ i+ w'' ~1 ' ~ [ K w.'r ~ • • ~ _ ~,p ~ .
/Q M✓
,~`.c ~~y t. -..Y ~ - f~G -7~ ~ ~ ~i E Ak),t/(.b
)tot
Dodd ~A' r~► ; r~ t
_ ~~r.L~ i ~ • % ` ;o
i ! J ~ L / ~ • 1 ) ' ~r 1C ~ : , ~ 9
z° Al ~
Qa~
~,*:rto O.M
►VE '0`ve ~ r • . • ~i Y~`
1~ 4t1~ t ~ ^ •~..SCF ~lO~~f
1 ~ 0~~~ 1 • ~ ~ .,,,f0' ~ s ~
• ` 7 / ~ ~ Y ' _
, ~ . . ~ -40•
j': • N ~ r • ~ r ~ ♦ "LS ~ 1 ~
~ ~~j/~. ,o Y ~ 1O"~►.~ ~~~.+0 ~ c -
. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ • • ~b r f 't ~ ~ ~ ~ • y
a`Y ; ; ' r t Z
• . . ; ~j ~ ~ Pj ( f.,` Vi ~ ~ L• : . ~'L •:5 4~ 3
N ~
~ ` _ o~ ►j~r • = d1 t~ ' S _ 1 ► ~ I
~ f ~ f 1 f'1~ V~ S ~ ,~1~1 ~
t tr"' / = ' ~ ♦
~i. o ~yp, ~ 798 b ~ ~ zo • v ~ s~`- ~
S• ~ Z •
s• _ _ ..,~,Nr""~ " os M~►~IG ` S ' "r3 /
~ ~ ~ r-"~- . ~ ,i•t. ~~7K ; ~4 1 ~ 1
+ar \d' i : • •r , ; ;
--x ~,,,~~.a~' ~ ~ ~ ,7 '
~s' f , , ~ ~ p ~ ~ 4 Aj
~ • ~ li
~ •`.1 ~-t•~'~. ' y l.6 ~ i~
4(AP %
ac~p -
~ ~ w A ~ 5 g t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .i! Ar d
w
~ ~ ~ • Y ~ f ' ~ ~ t S.~ _
# ~ •Z 2'~ o,sri & . _ ~ - r` ~ ' ` ~ ~ c
~ 'y • C~~~ - GOVt-4 ` Ul)o •0~ Aw
I ~r ~ _ +Y . ~ ~POKANE h~a ~e+,0 Npl
.1-= ✓ r -lti y t
S R
pO K~n !
101#L x
0 1 o a
I V. o
,n ~ v •
I 0
\
J a 4 ~ ~
~
1
. I
i
i
1
;
I
~
~
f
I
I
I f
~
,
I
t
~
i~
~ -~'J r ~ ► ~ ~ ~1 ~ ,;:ii~~ ~
• , 1
C
,cn ~
m r~ _.._V__...M. ;
~ ~ ►
'mi
F,
!
s ~ 1
~ r .
,
~ _ . . , . ~ .
~
~ _ _ . . . .
i
~
i f
~ I I
,
t~.__. j ~
. . . . _ I t
. . . , ~ ~
CVO~j C-VI-No(,-JV
r --E f*. 1
,23_ E_7_ ~
A. _ ~
t~4 gi
m f 5 S I.O N A V E.i
, ~
v. L vE
. . .-e►-- ~ . . ~
~ ~ T = 0 INT 3L
~ O
a
.
r. B 0 oN E ~ N
$ t,►1 E 'T Q ~ -
= o~'•'~ T ' D E S M ET Av E ~ p
A C A T A L. OO 0! W -
~ O
~ • W AYtt.CMV CT. ~ -
a
tl o v W o~
cr >
: W w
> 8 AY °D
♦ , v. ~ . .
. .
. i, ti
.
V , i K i j►V ~ ALRi V
~
ac / v! AVI S ~
Z
~IAY a; ~ VALLEY WAY ~
Q , IXON
J ♦ ~ ` ~
Cl Ub W ~
t
f` ~ v res~. .
ot i z FU. RIVER51.'
£L . ~9~ • PR GUE V!"'. ~
• • , -r r ~ . . ~ .
~ • . PCST FFICE • ~ i
J ~ c
cc 0%~ , -
- - - - - • • - -
R D • , ' ,1 . .
! T-~
r` 4 TH 4 T H !J V E.
~ • .
r ° z < . W
` , < ~
~ vE AvE.~` ~ rt
. t ~ ~ • u
Y Z W,' 7TMAVE S 7TM A
0 t
EL. 2014 f I > f 8 T H Av E
- ~ g rr+ nv e T« W
: l
N < 0
1 Q 7'H
~
t 3I }
m
3
I
~E
s s
w
~ .a.
P
i a
a
i I
I t
t
s ,
~ x'
s
~ ri
; " ~ M, " ~ ~
" "
~
~ ~s. . _ m ~"x.... _ _ m
~
~M.µ"'' ,rv .E
"
" w, „ ""e''. "3
" ~ ",a
a~ r a; " ~ 'r' "
~ ~ n r.:. g g.„~
P w ~ " ~
~ ~p "B ' " r .p'. I a " K 9 r k' tea." ti~1.
:per ~«S". y~,:".. Po " M. :h .S S. " " aµ r + , ; .w
" & rv " , ,K ..w.~ w " .s s ~ " " . w. t
" w . ~ „W ~ " "
~ " ~ - " "
b t ~ ~ " , " " " " ~
µ " ~ ~ W . , .,w• " x, w " " " ~ ~ " a+,' " ,w" " " " " sµ ' " " "
" " P, ~ " ~ ~ " " " " " " " w+". B" 3 mom. " $ ~ ,~."~mr 4 µ~;G;~, ~x a.:- .E~..
e. s. " p,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " r~ "
. " "y, r"w ,c" " ~ "w " " " " "
" ~ ~ " " ~ " ' ~ " " " " "
" , , " ~
" ~ ~ " ~
m " " , w ~ ~ r .a ,w " x ,.y~ " ~ " " ~ ~ " s w " " "
r" " " " " ~ ~ " "
" a » . " ~ s " « , a, " " " , rv "
" " w
" v, ~t, ~ k ~ ~s " " " "s. „ " ~
„ , a N, " , "
" . ' ~ " * s a~~
d :mod' . " x " • " ~ r ~ "
" " ~ " ~ " " _ ^ a, t a. " k » „
1 ~ , _ " " " "
8 "y~ 8. m', H "^..:.wp!.u~ ~"y,".~ x... .:yo- 8 w. X sw r..+., »u: m, .was'
"a. s " " y".
" r ~ "N " " "
~ _ r. J. • •
,~,"s ~ p ~ x ° " x . " ~ " " n. » . "k b~ " ~ ~ " " _ " ,
" " . s " ~ ~
" , yy a~~
µ " r " E " " r ~ " " r. " " p
~ . ' ~ " " p~ " ' sf" ~ 3 'R... g T"~ ~ "g - ' aa" "i"y .7C k~ " " c' „ W " r~C m'; r.L y "'.%"6'. v " a~:
•wxv "p Ma, „ " a
" " ~rv u•.~ " " " " " ~ "
" ; " ~ ~a, ~ ~ ~ ~ "
~ " " , rv,~. „ ~ ' ~ ~
" " " " , " " " ,t " w," " 3 asp "r~`µ . ~ W ~ "
r . ,a, " " " " ,m: " " ~ " "
e~ • r " ~
" r; & x " ,m " ~ w " "
c " " " "
" s, " " ,
~ s W~
'ar a
M.: " " ~ a"~ ~
" " " 4.
~
s w
~ u
{
F
~ x:'.
x.Y.. ~x nx r w. r~~' x ~ x~ ~r~
xwx x:....r ~....~b. xwWe'wr_.,b~n'''w w r.~;':d~y y~wgr=.: ~.rr ,u.:: ~ xn~'. 8. _ x "~""~,x nr. x' Ax x
y n r~ w r 'ir~ x rw mix y^x. r d.
µ w 0~ x " x
5'a nx 9 , . . e w
,r ~ ~G
w. r
a'.
a w, x.»,r'i . ~w ,ir as
s
,rv,. a
~ , ~~:~a ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ .w ~ ,w ~ „ r s
` sa ; u
~ p ^ . . • . „ ~ ~
;,~.y ~ A p ~
f
i . •
~ ~ j
Y 1 k
.
~ ~
~ !
r a a,": ,a > "
~ , ~ ~ g a ry., k w F a s
}
r.. ~.,'4...:: ..,,K.. ~
%;w ±4. d
~ w
f
t
f 3 t ~ry
_ _ _
. - . -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .