The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-0020-00 A, ' ~ THE TRANSPO GROUP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Valley Way Residential Development i Prepared for: ~ Storhaug Engineering ~ August 29, 2000 . ~-~f- RECEIVEG SPOKANE COUNTY ~ ~ SE P 1 ► 200G Tra"spo DIVISION oF PLANN+~~~ - G* MEMORA ND UM T0: Scott Engelhad, County Engineers DATE: September 12, 2000 Steve Stairs, County Transportation Tammi Jones, County Pian ing , ~ FROM: Bill White ~ TG: 00121.00 Transportation Engineer SUBJECT: VALLEY WAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - TIA ADDENDUM This memorandum is an addendum to the Valley Way Residential Development Transportation hrpact Analysis (TIA) submitted to Spokane County by The Transpo Group on August 30, 2000. The information ia provided as a result of questions/comments highlighted in the September 13, 2000 review letter by Spokane County Transportadon. Please review and contact our office with any further questions or comments. Original TIA Conclusions As described in the Valley Way Residential Development TIA, the proposed site would be located in the Spokane Valley on Valley Way east of Conklin Road. The development would be constructed prior to year 2005 and would consist of 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units. Local trip generation data, in coordination with Institute of Transportation Engineers methodology, indicates that the project would generate approadinatety 1,750 da.ily trips and 114 PM peak hour trips. These trips were distributed to a study area defined by the public and Spokane County to determine project impacts. Highway Capacity Manual level of service, arterial capacity, and traffc signa.i warrant analyses were conducted in conformity with Spokane County guidelines. The results indicate that the development would have minimal impacts within the community and that sufficient existing arterial/intersection capacittiT was available for the growth of this project. Per established The Tiranspo Group County im.pact fee requirements, the development would contribute $5,800 to the construction of the Sullivan Road/WEi I-90 access loop ramp with no further mitigation being required. Addendum Analysis The intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue was highlighted for analysis by Spokane County and was inadvertently omitted from the Valley Way Residential Development TIA. An analysis was conducted to forecast project impacts at this intersection. Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue is signalized with four intersection approaches. The signal is fully-actuated with protected left-turn phasing on all approaches. The proposed Valley Way 12esidential Development is located to the east of this intersection. Recent PM peak hour traffic counts were obta.ined for this intersection from Spokane County. A 3-percent annual growth rate was applied to obtain 2005 background traffic volumes. The 3-percent growth rate was recommended by Spokane County and is consistent with rates used in the TIA. In addition, forecast project traffic from Sonrise Land LLC, a proposed development on Broadway Avenue east of Moore Street, was added to background traffic to produce year 2005 without-project traffic volumes. The existing and future without-project traffic volumes are shown on Attachment 1. As stated, the proposed Valley Way Residential Development would generate approximately 114 PM peak hour trips. Existing travel patterns were used to distribute these trips to the study area and approximately 35 percent of site-generated trips are anticipated to travel t.Yirough the Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue intersection. These trips are added to 2005 without-project traffic volumes to produce 2005 with-project traffic volumes for the PM peak hour. Site generated trip assignments and 2005 futuze with-project traffic volumes are highlighted on Attachment 1. Levels of service (LOS) classify intersection operations from LOS A, indicating free-flow with little congestion, to LOS D, indicating high congestion with long vehicle delays. The LOS , Transportation and Traffrc Engineering PLANNING • DESlGN The Tiranspo Group conducted for this analysis are based upon the methodologies outline in the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and conform to Spokane County guidelines. Synchro 4.0 by Trafficware was thP HCM based software package that was used to conduct LOS for the existing, future without, and future with-project conditions. The PM peak hour results for the intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue are shown on Table 1. Table 1. Sullivan RoadBroadway Avenue LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour Existing 2005 VVithout-Project 2005 With-Project LOS' Delay2 VIC3 LOS' Delay2 VIC3 LOS' Delay2 VIC3 . C 21.9 0.71 C 30.4 0.85 C 30.8 0.86 1. LOS = Level of Service. 2. Delay = Average vehicle delay expressed in seconds. 3. V/C = Volume to Capacihy Ratio. - - ~ ~ Spokane County guidelines indicate that operations for signalized intersections are acceptable at LOS D or better. As shown, the intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue operates acceptably at LOS C and should continue to operate acceptably at LOS in the future with the addition of project traffic. Project impacts are also shown to be m;n;mal with less than a 1- second increase in delay between future without and with project conditions. Synchro output summary sheets are attached to tlus memorandum. Summary This addendum to the Val.ley Way Residential Development TIA was provided to address project impacts at the intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue. Based upon a LOS analysis, the intersection would continue to operate acceptably at LOS C and development traffic would be responsible for less than a 1-second increase in delay. Project impacts at Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue are anticipated to be minimal and we have no further recommendations for this project. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99201 5091462-0606 FAX: 5091747-3317 . N 1259 183 259 ~I 231 ~ ~ 122 143 - = 146 70 107 159 94 853 County 1998 Traffic Counts 1550 225 320 ~ L ~ Su(livon Rood/Broodnoy Avenue Intersetlion J 285 ~ I 165 ~ 175----.0- _ 180 ss 145 z 195 115 ~ 1050 Fulure 2005 Withoui-Project ~ (Includes Pipefine Trof(ic) ` wLIr Way ~ ~9 a = 2 ` . - ~ sprw ,km,e Z # 2005 Projecl Assignment . ~ ~ . i 1553 225 338 JL 285 174 179 - ~ 182 ss 146 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS STUDY AREA 195 117 1052 Future 2005 With-Project Attachment 1 M ..:f-- Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue Intersection - Existing and Forecast Traffic Volumes ; ~ ~ Valle), Way Residential Propert}; . . . , (E) C:400121Vgraphfc01 billw 091150 10:18 . ~ i 1: Counry 1998 Broadwav Avenue & Sullivan Road I: County 1448 sinadwny Avenuc & Suliivan Rand Lanes, Volumes, Timings Lanes, Volumes, Timinqs ♦--t i~ t ~ `►1 ~ --►--t 'r ~ 4-- t /e. `►1 ~ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Grouq EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane ConfiguraUons ~ 0 1 +T. ++T# +}f, Walk Time (s) 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 110 Lane Width (H) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls (#lhr) 0 0 0 0 Grade 0% 0% 0g'o 0% Lane Grp Cap (vph) 308 778 191 596 237 1821 466 1863 Storage Lenglh (fi) 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 vls Ratio Prot 014 0 06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.08 0.30 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 vls RaUo Perm , Total Losi Time (s) 30 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 30 10 Crftical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detedor (fl) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act EFfct Green (s) 126 155 91 9.8 9.7 26.0 10.3 26.7 Trailing Detector (8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.18 0.22 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.37 0.15 0.38 Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 vlc Ratio 0.77 0.28 0.50 0 50 0 69 0 54 0.54 0.60 Lane Ulil Factor 1 00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0 97 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay, d 1 28.2 15.5 30.4 14.9 29.6 17.5 28.5 19.6 Frt Protected 0 951 0.932 0.985 0.981 Percentile Delay 393 171 306 15.7 38.9 17.8 29.3 19.8 Flt Proiected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Percentile LOS D B C B D B C B Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3333 0 1752 3267 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 Frt Perm 0.951 0.932 0 985 0.981 Area Type: Oiher Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Cycle Length: 80 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3333 0 1752 3267 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 Actualed Cycle Length: 70.8 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Natural Cycle: 80 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 127 25 37 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Headway Factor 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 00 Tolal Lost Time: 12 Volume (vph) 231 143 70 107 146 122 159 853 94 259 1259 183 Sum of Critical v!s Ratios: 0.60 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) Intersection vlc Ratio: 0.71 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0 96 0 96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay- 21.9 Growth Faclor 100% 100°k 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ; Infersection Percentile LOS; C Heavy Vehicles 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% ' Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splits and Phases: 1: County 1998 Broadway Avenue 8 Sullivan Road Parking (#Jhr) Mid-Block TraffiC 0% 0% 0% D% I~ al It 02 `03 ~ 04 Adj. Flow (vph) 241 149 73 111 152 127 166 889 98 270 1311 191 114 s I 30 s I 13 s I 23 s Lane Group Flow (vph) 241 222 0 111 279 0 166 987 0 270 1502 0 4\ 05 i a6 .14 01 I~ 08 Turn Type Pro1 Prot Prot Prot 113: n31 s I 16 s F-120 s I Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permiited Phases Deiector Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Minimum InRial (s) 4,0 4.0 4,0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Spfd (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 80 20.0 Total Split (s) 16.0 23.0 0.0 13.0 20.0 0.0 13.0 30.0 0.0 140 31.0 0.0 Total Split 20% 29°/a 0% 16% 25°h 0% 16% 38% 0% 189'0 39°fo 0% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 19.0 9.0 16.0 9.0 26.0 10,0 27.0 YellowTime(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 All•Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lap Oplimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehide Extension (s) 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 30 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 00 Time To Reduce (s) 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 0,0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None A9in None Min C 1001211L0SISuI-8rd.sy6 Synchro 4 Rcport C:1001211L0SISuI-Bid.s),6 S}'nchro J Repurt ihen•ans-fl'4 l thetrans-ff41 , L• runire Without•Projcct Broudway Avenue & Sullivan Road I: Fulure Without-Project Broad«•ay Avcnue & Sullivazi Raad Lanes, Volumes, Timings Lanes, Volumes, Timings ~4- t r0 1 ~ * 'e- <4\ t /p. `►1 ~ LaneGroup EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LaneGroup EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ftT ~tT# Walk Time (s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11 0 11.0 11,0 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestnan Calls (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap (vph) 332 651 261 588 228 1898 523 2014 Storage Length (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vls Ratio Prot 0.17 0,07 0.09 0.08 0.12 0,24 0.10 0.37 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 vls Ratio Perm Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 3.0 Criiical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detecior (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effcl Green (s) 16.0 14.8 12.6 11.4 11.0 32.1 13,0 34.1 Trailing Detedor (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.13 013 0 38 0.15 0.40 Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v!c Ratio 0.89 0.42 0.58 0.61 0.89 0.64 0.64 0.92 Lane UGI. Factor 1.00 0.95 0 95 100 0.95 0,95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0 91 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 334 213 33.4 17.6 36.1 21.0 33.5 23.4 Frt Protected 0.951 0 928 0 985 0.981 Percen6le Delay 57,6 21,9 33.9 17.5 61.1 21.9 34,1 30.5 Ffl Proteded 0 950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Percentile LOS E C C B E C C C Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3333 0 1752 3253 0 1752 4960 D 3400 4940 0 Fri Perm. 0.951 0 928 0 985 0.981 Area Type, Other FII Perm 0 950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Cycle Lengih 90 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3333 0 1752 3253 D 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 Acluated Cycle Length; 84.5 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Naiural Cycie 90 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 82 172 23 34 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Headway Factor 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 Total Losi Time: 12 Volume (vph) 285 175 85 145 180 165 195 1050 115 320 1550 225 Sum of Critical vls Ratios: 0.74 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) Intersection v!c Ratio: 0.65 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Intersection Percentile Signal Delay. 30.4 Growth Factor 100% 100°/0 100% 100°/0 100°!0 100% 100% 100°/0 100% 100% 100% 100% Intersection Percentile LOS: C Heavy VBhICleS 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3°h Bus Blockages (#!hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splits and Phases: 1: Future Without•Project Broadway Avenue 8 Sulllvan Road Parking (#Ihr) Mid-BIOCk TreffiC 0% 0% 0% 0% 01 02 `03 -00' 04 , Ad). Flow (vph) 297 182 89 151 188 172 203 1094 120 333 1615 234 I~34 s I~18 s I~Zl s I Lane Group Flow (vph) 297 271 0 151 360 0 203 1214 0 333 1649 0 ~.5 1 06 ~ 07 I~ se Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Prot L4 s 1__Jr27 s I__A19 a L-12,D s IJ Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Deteclor Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 80 200 80 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 21.0 0.0 18.0 20.0 0.0 14.0 34,0 00 17.0 37,0 0.0 TOt21 Split 21% 23% 0% 20% 22% 0% 16% 38°k 0% 19% 41% 0% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 17.0 14.0 16.0 10,0 30.0 13.0 33.0 Yellow Time (s) 35 3.5 3.5 3.5 35 3.5 3,5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 05 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead•Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehide Extension (s) 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 00 0,0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None fNin None Min C•100121U.OSIFIVO Sul•9rd sy6 Synchro d Reporl 01001211LOSIFWO Sul-Brd sy6 Synchro 4 Repoit Ihehans-54 I ihetrans•ff41 - - 1: Future 4Vi1h•Prolecl Broadway Avenuc & 5ullivaii Raad I, Fufure Wit]rProject Brondwny Avenoe &SulELvan Raad Lanes, Volumes, Tlminqs Lenes, Vvlumes, Timinqs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4\ t l` --I' --m. i t LaneGroug E6L EBT EBR 1NBL lh'Bi WBR NBL NBT NBR SsL SBT 39R LeneGrouo EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT UI1OR N6L N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuretions ~ 0 ~ 0 11 ttt. 1 ~}~~r Walk Time (s) 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 I AtlealFlow(uphpf) 1900 1964 1900 1900 1900 1940 1900 1900 19R4 1900 1900 1900 FlashDentWalk(s) 11.0 11,0 11.0 13.0 ' Lane Vt+idfh (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 iZ 12 Pedesirian Ca115 (ft)hr) fl b 0 0 Grade 0% b°fd 0% 00/0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 332 653 261 599 22$ 1952 551 204$ Siorage Length (ft) p 0 0 p a b 4 0 vls Ratia Prot 0,17 0A7 0.09 0.08 0,12 0,24 4.10 0.37 51orage Lanes 1 fl 1 0 1 4 2 0 I v15 Ratio Perm Total Losl Time (s) 3,0 3,q 3.0 3,0 3,0 30 30 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 Crilical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector (ft) 54 Sa 50 50 50 50 50 50 RCt EifCt Green {sJ 16,0 14.9 12.6 11.5 11.4 31.3 13.7 34,1 T[81ling []e9eeior (fi) 4 0 b 0 p U 0 0 Acluated g!C Ratio 019 {I 18 4.15 4.14 013 037 618 0.40 Turning 5peetl (mph) 15 9 15 9 95 9 95 9 vIC Ratio 0,89 0,42 0.58 0.62 0,89 0,66 4,54 0.92 Lane U1111, Factor 1,00 0.95 0 95 1 00 0 95 0.95 100 0:91 0 91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Unifarm Delay, d1 33,4 21,7 33.5 17,2 38.4 21 T 33.1 235 Fri Protecied 0.951 0.927 0.9$5 0 981 Percenfile Delay 56,4 22,4 33.9 17.1 67.5 22,7 33.6 ~0,9 Fp Pratected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,950 Perceniile LO$ E C C B E C C C SaId.Flaw(prol)1752 3333 Q 1752 3249 0 1752 4960 6 3404 4940 Q Fri Perm 0.951 0.D27 0,995 0981 Area Type Other FH Perm. 0.954 4.950 4,950 0,950 Cycle I.ength; 90 Sald. Flow(perrn) 1752 3333 0 1752 3249 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 ActuaCed Cycle Lengih, 84,$ RlghtTurn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Natural Cycle: 94 5ald, FIow(RTpR) 79 181 23 34 Conlral 7ype; Actuaied•Uncoardinaled ke2dwayFackor 1.00 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 10o 1.00 1,04 TatalLostYime.12 Valume (uph) 285 179 95 146 182 174 195 9052 117 338 1553 225 Sum af Crflical vfs Ratios: 0.74 Gonfl. Peds (#Fhr) Intersectfon vJc Ratio 0.85 Peak Hour Faclor 0.96 0.98 0.96 0.86 0.$6 4.96 0.98 0,96 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.96 InfersectiQn percentile Signal Delay: 34.8 ~ GtO+MM Fadar 104% 1d09ro- 10096 100% 1b0°lo 160°l0 1b4°la 100% 104°Iq 10D°lo 100% 100°/a IntefseCtiOn PB►C9rt1l6 LO$: G , Heaay Uehicles {°,o] 3ryla 3% 3% 3°h 3°l0 3% 3°/a 3% 3% 3% 3°la 3% Bus Blockages (#lhr) 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 Bpli#s and Rhases: 1; Futura With•prvjeck Broadway Avenue 8Sullivan Rpad Parking (#fhr) Mid-Bloek TreffiC 0°!p U°,'o 0% O% si m2 ~ 03 k-ol o4 Adj. Flow(vph) 297 186 89 152 190 181 203 1096 122 352 1616 234 116s I133s I 18s 1. 121 s I LaneGrpupFlow(vph) 297 275 fl 152 371 4 203 1218 0 352 1852 0 ~ m5 I+ 06 ~ mT .4- m8 Turn Type Prol Proi Prot Pral 7~7a I 1'19 a I_,~p s - Protected Phases 7 4 3 @ 5 2 1 6 Permilled Phases Detector Phases 7 4 3 6 5 2 1 6 Minimum In9lial (s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.o a.O 4,0 4.0 Minimum Sptit (s) 80 20.0 6.0 20.0 A.U 20.0 80 20.0 Tolal Splik (s) 10,0 21.0 0.0 18.0 20.0 D.4 14.0 33.0 0.0 18.0 37.0 0.0 TolalSplit(%) 21% 23% 096 20% 22% 0% 18% 37% 0% 20°k di% 0% M$ximum Green (s) 150 17_0 14.0 18,0 10.0 29,6 14.0 33,0 YsllOw Time {s} 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 15 3.5 15 3.5 All-Red Tima(s) 0.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4.5 Leadlag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag ~ead I.ag Lead-L2g OptimFZe7 'fe5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Uehicle Extension (s) 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 30 3c 30 3.6 3,4 3.0 3,0 Tirne Berore Reduce (s) 00 fl o o a 00 00 0,0 o,a 0,0 Tlrne To Reduee (s) 0,0 0.0 o a 0.0 D,D 0.0 0.0 4,9 Recall Made None None None hfane Nane Min None Min (:'19Gt211L05krW5ul-Brd.sy6 5ym6m4 Report C:I00 12111,(]51F4V5ul•Brd.sy6 SyiFChrv4Report I thetrans•f~41 tlieuans-fi'41 . MEMORANDUM DATE: September 13, 2000 ~ TO: Scott Engelhard CC: Bill White, The Transpo Group, Inc. Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning " FROM: Steve Stairs CS D,S~ SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Valleyway Residential Project at Conklin & Main (ZE-20-00) SpoKacowy I have completed review of the above referenced document and have noted the following comments. I ask that these comments be addressed by the project traffic consultant prior to making a SEPA determination and continuing through the approval process. 1. The final scope for the traffic study required analysis of the Sullivan/Broadway intersection. This intersection was omitted from the report. The LOS calculation sheets should be submitted as an addendum to the report. 2. During scoping, I failed to include the Sonrise Land Development project (ZE-13-00) as a background development for this study. Since the levels of service at the other intersections in the report are well above the LOS thresholds, and ZE-13-00 is not a large traffic generator based on that project's trip distribution letter, I would allow the background growth to be added in the Sullivan/Broadway analysis required above. The Broadway/Moore intersection (the only other scoped intersection affected by ZE13-00) can be assumed that it will continue to operate well above LOS E. This was a well done traffic study and report and I would recommend that the consultant submit the trip generation information for the existing developments to the Institute of Transportation Engineers to add to their database for apartments and senior housing. It is always helpful to have local trip generation rates when available. If you have any questions concerning the review of the traffic study or the above comments, please feel free to bring them to my attention. Post-W Fax Note 7671 Date,~/~ lpages~ I~ ' l To ~ i(A W V1 tT'~ From i S~G..1 v Co./Dept. T (-316 Co. Phone # Phone # -7 49 2, Fax # - ?)31 ~ ~ Fax # • - - , _SL nO can pr.o)ect Management ~r ~ .:.a ~~COUAI Q ry F~~~~NE~R June 6, 2000 Steve Stairs Spokane County Public Works 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Traffic Distribution Letter tor Sonrise Land LLC, UR22 Rezone Dear Mr. Stairs: In response to memorandum dated May 23, 2000: Due to the preliminary nature of the proposed rezone of the Broadway srte we have no substantial traffic pattems on which to base a north / south split of trip courrt. We can only estimate these numbers at this time. Based on the 264 trips per day With approximately 213 rds. (176 trips) of the traffic using the Broadway / Su(iivan intersedion, we estimate that'/ of the 176 or 88 trips per day will go north towards the I-90 / Sullivan interchange and half will either continue west down Broadway or turn south on Sullivan Road. Please call with any questions you may have regarding this project Thank you, ~ K 1~) Jeff Morse Engineering Technician _ it DQ, Storhaug Engineering ~~T ~qy ~ ~ S~'~~ Reviewed by: . J rry ug, P. E. p 2sss9 ~ ~e`d~ ~ ~ 9F~,STF~~o `.../CNAL r, ~ ~ ~ 1322 North Monroe * Spokane, Washington 99201 Phone (509) 242-1000 • Fax (509) 242-1001 0 . . , '✓-i- STORHAUG J-- : ENGINEERING - - -r lCi, vil ~ngineering.,and Project Management s,~o~ 1 S April 26, 2000 ~FCp0 ?D00 ry~01G/ ~FFR Scott Engelhard Spokane County Public Worlcs 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Broadway Re-zone (UR-3.5 to UR-22) Dear Mr. Engelhard: In response to pre-corrference meeting notes (April 12, 2000) on behatf of Sonrise Land LLC I am submitting the following traffic distribution letter. The proposed re-zone site consists of 3 separate parcels totaling approximately 1.4 acres. CuRent land use consists of 2 single-family residences and a vacant field. The proposed use after the re-zone is three 2-story professional office buildings. There will be no phasing of this project. The office buildings will each have approximately 4,000 sf. per floor and wll have utility / storage basements. Parking capacity will meet Spokane County standards at approximately 71 total spaces for the 3 buildings. The business within these buildings may vary but will comply with the UR-22 zoning. Their hours of operation will generally fall within normal hours for professional offices with light or no weekend hours of operation. The average vehicle trips generated during weekdays are 264 trips per day based on 8,000 square feet per building (24,000 sf.). The average AM and PM peak traffic trips are 36. These traffic counts are based upon information from the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation, 6t' Edition. Approximately 213 of the traffic wil{ use Broadway to the west to Sullivan and the remaining traffic will use Broadway to the east. Thank you, Jeff Morse Engineering Technician , Stofiaug Engineenng ~ - EnGosure (2) . Reviewed by: . _ J orhau , P. E. 1322 North Monroe • Spokane, Washington 99201 Phone (509) 242-1000 • Fax (509) 242-1001 i gO SP I ~N ~1/SS . P R 0 iS_ TE , r- . - ~ . . ~ i - ---G~ i--- ~ ~ . l i S P R A G _ _ _ - w ~ Q - - 4 . ....]_1 _ T - I J 24 ~ 19 ( i n ~ _ ~ _ ~-r:D ~ , - jv~ ~ L L E Y . _ . 1--.._ 1- ~ E ~16 ~ . ~ P 4-1 ~ 20TH 21 25 30 6 Y , , Of . ~ ~ . .32N D ~ m I~ , , 32ND ; ~ . AINTED'~ 1 ~ .41LLS 3 35 36 3 l!" S~ GOLF , L**.- ~ - r ' c\l ; . ~ ~ • • , ' Z ~ ~ ~ Z ~+r o . ~ 2 ~ J e ~ r. n • / . ~ 0 u ~ SCALE = 1:4000 ~ / BROADWAY OF-FICE COMPLEX ~ STORHAUG ENGINEERING VIC{NITY MAP FOR 1322 NORTH MONROE TRAFFIC DISTR18UT10N SPOKANE, WA 99201 DRAWN 8Y: MORSE I DATE: 05/04/00 ` (509) 242-1000 CHECKED BY: JS I PROJECT No.: 99-068 ~ ~ ~ PSS1Nrj 8'3 ZONE . ~ BROADWAY AVENUE ~ ~ • OQIIIO PAYOONT T amm soerWC ttr amana m rocAw mxm - - - - - j~ _ ~ - ~I , -L - L..I a nK n~ro+a rrw ra ~,~o►aaT~ ~i ni~ a wo~r~a m~ rt~ ~NOe,ao , . ~ i ~~~A,~ 51l~ 3 5~ ~p I ~ • 10H~ x`5~IF1d ~ ldTWE i ~ . , . ' • ' , ' . ~ mW Pa ~~.F•'~(~i,t'~2'i'' ~J+~~~''•~;i'.~f:~Tr~~~~ .t:r ,'Yt•~: .'f.~,l`~ t.`l",r• .v.i~,~r~i.~;'~„•,..o ~;ff/!iff`i!//:r ~ ~':~J,/ffr~:~:r/l.f~~J~.• I ~ I ~ no rtan j" ~-4 ~ ~ I ( i 1 j~ ta rnK I tANaxxMc ,Q l ~ l rnn ~ ~ no ~n ~ ~ao l ;r: m" Po t W/ami - am r r h~ ial .M wft9.01- , ~ ha ta1 ~ s~aa •~oo / I~a J eaac u~r ttw~---~ L L ~ 4W j h td 1"IE I LAl~O SIAf PFA 14101.010 WMACK LYE CTVP•) ' I . 51SBd~~''s1~~ l1R' 2~~E ''S ,~1N~ 0X15'~ING sYJ5 ` ! GRAPHIC 9CALE L .1 L' T caMr) l..I ..-.0 9L 1 Spokane County Transportation tion:Sullivan & Broadway (509) 324-3492 Study Name• SULLBROD o t by:Clirt - Alysa 1998 A.D. Site Code : 45970324 Soard - 1514 Petra Start Date: 04/29/98 Weather :Clear Sunny Warm • • Page Vehicle group 1 iSullivan lBroadway ISullivan leroadway IFrom North iFzom EasG iFrom South lFrom west Start I I I I lZntvl. Time I Left Thru RTOR Riah[l Left Thru RTOR RiQhti Left Thzu RTOR Riqhtl Left T2ru RTOR Rivhtl Total 04/29/98 1 1 1 1 15:301 82 232 5 211 32 51 22 211 28 203 1 341 30 46 1 151 829 15:45I 59 269 3 381 32 29 9 181 26 204 2 291 29 42 3 201 812 Hourl 141 501 8 591 64 80 21 391 54 407 3 631 59 88 4 351 1626 1 1 1 1 1 16:001 71 275 1 391 33 30 10 281 18 201 1 241 35 32 2 221 822 16:151 72 313 1 561 31 30 4 241 28 203 2 281 38 29 4 81 866 16:301 73 259 2 391 37 35 9 201 24 192 1 301 57 40 6 101 834 16:451 66 330 3 531 23 38 13 191 41 227 0 311 41 32 5 111 933 Hourl 282 1177 7 1871 124 233 36 911 111 823 4 1131 171 128 17 511 3455 1 1 1 1 { 17:001 67 279 2 401 33 38 11 241 33 178 1 171 68 46 5 11l 843 17:151 68 337 1 SOi 20 31 19 141 42 232 2 121 65 32 6 161 947 17:301 58 313 3 311 31 39 9 231 43 216 4 271 57 33 1 15I 903 17:451 62 283 4 321 23 34 9 171 46 220 2 231 28 49 5 81 840 Hourl 255 1212 10 1531 107 142 48 681 154 845 9 791 218 155 27 501 3533 1 1 1 1 1 ' 18:001 69 238 4 221 31 43 12 251 35 199 0 251 40 33 5 91 780 18:151 76 211 3 141 27 33 10 161 35 208 1 231 37 19 0 171 730 Total( 823 3339 32 4351 353 431 127 2291 399 2483 17 3031 525 423 43 1621 10124 ~ t Apr. ~ 17.7 72.1 0.6 9.31 30.9 37.8 11.1 20.01 12.4 77.5 0.5 9.41 45.5 36.6 3.1 14.01 - 't Znc. ~ 8.1 32.9 0.3 4.21 3.4 4.2 1.2 2.21 3.9 29.5 0.1 2.91 5.1 4.1 0.4 1.61 - Peak Hour Analysis By £ntire Zntersection for the 2eriod: 15:30 on 04/29/98 to 28:15 on 04/29/98 ~ Time ~ 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 ~ Vol. ~ 259 1259 9 1741 107 146 52 701 159 853 7 871 231 243 17 531 Pct. 1 15.2 74.0 0.5 10.21 28.5 38.9 13.8 28.61 14.3 77.1 0.6 7.81 52.0 32.2 3.8 11.91 Total ~ 1701 ~ 375 ~ 1206 ~ 444 ~ High ~ 17:15 ~ 17:30 ~ 16:45 ~ 17:00 ~ Vol. ~ 68 337 1 50l 31 39 9 231 41 227 0 311 68 46 5 11l Total ~ 456 1 102 ~ 299 ( 130 ~ PHF ~ 0-932 ~ 0.919 ~ 0.924 ~ 0.853 ~ 3 (~D Z.~ ~ °~-7C.4 ~ ~ i - _ Sc.oP E~ ~ Traffic Study Scope Worksheet~I&I.4 _ ~ &nCNA-4~Y Transportation Engineering - f Name of Project: wA 2Es, -b t#J ii Planning File Number. ?_E,- Zo- L-a S-T-R: i3-z5l44 Lead Planner: Date of Scoping Meeting: Attended By: L F-r-el-4.; t+t C, J, S G O P r...D 04 gF- rt'1 ti IL. Description of Project: ?_ES~ ~ C r-a ~ 04 Land Uses(if known): /zo I-nF 0 L~ 7 s V r, r-{ 4 Project Phasing: Build Out Year: Public Scoping Meeting: Date: 8 l Llc-~ Time: 5;0c>PM Place: ;,tALx_c 1, ScoQe of StudY ❑ Environmental Impact Statement ~ Full Traffic Study ❑ Other Study/Review Intersections to Study: Qcx- :;,-r,E D,2wEva-fS . 39-oa0v~rA~t JAc~-6 y w A`1 ~ S c.A_c_.[.. r vA.Al , h7Da Zt ~~~~c? a D L .r,q~, . , r3P~.~► p+..~s~ C~ n! 1~L- i^t _~At.c.E t~ Is-} ~ C~ ~.t ~-1•.~ Background Development Prcjects- Background Growth Rate: . Pass-by Traf`ic Rate: Site Distance Analysis: Na ~Jf_ Area Transportation Improvement Projects (Planned/Scheduled): ~L t-LA- ,,;,~,.-ti Anticipated Directional Distnbution of Project Traffic: c~Tr~0 ;Z-C Jt ST g i 34,c.Tt. 50M E 7e.Q Ft= (G F (Zv •n Vsatc_EYk/A`J ~ 5~,~.L.Li r, ~ ~.1.-t-( . 4 5 t~c..c.c~4i~ C4) ~~sc~s$ ar Maitl AV€ . m~~vfaE Nw*te.CR 0' P(U JccZ Tk, T4~~4c:M S~u.~YA,I 0-j) /=0f_ ?4l~'r~~~PAT~'O~ ih! c.;.~oP P-amP ~QQ•~L.: b4' ~iscus5 AJ6yc.t4c_j o~ OZ,~,Jo wipT•i ad %14<.4.XyL,,~~Y -7-c ►',2oJ&_ . . •Final scope witl bc established after the Rrst public meeting and upon raxipt of a distribution letter and map from thc pmjcct's traffic engineer. • This scaping documeat fulfilts the requirrments set forth by Spokane County Engineering. Additional analysis may be rcquired by other rcviewing agencies. 6/O 1/98 kg) i~Z Fec:, --I tlf,~ e ,f j5t7- vF 7 c'TAL?f~1 rFJG L . Sf ~AC'tuE ~ ~'C•~g- t..r -l 1 hlTE rCSEc-Tit)rl r l~s1~t7' LrF~alrrC..l (r( i h=..ir t--~G. A Stairs, Steve From: Bill White[SMTP:BiIIW@thetranspogroup.com] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:45 PM To: 'sstairs@spokanecounty.org' w il public scoping meeiing doc The following highlights the Valleyway Residential Public Scoping meeting. The note taker, in my opinion missed a couple of issues which seem most relevant for our analysis. 1- Redistribute some traffic from Valley Way to Sprague. 2 - Verify trip generation. 3- Assess operations at Valley Way/Moore Street. What is your schedule like early next week?? I have a few projects to discuss with you and I would also like your input on some things. Maybe we can do the lunch thing "ofF' the record of coarse. Does Tuesday or Wednesday work for you? Bill «public scoping meeting.doc» Page 1 Pub • v • Meeting August 0M • Notification method inadequate. Therefore, must notify the attendees of this meeting. Put paper notices two times in Review. • Assignment of Traffic was done on `worst case' scenario. The conclusion was that more traffic does not go to Valleyway and Sullivan, but uses Conklin to Sprague in order to access Sullivan. • Traffic counts were done between 4pm to 6pm two months ago: 0 400-600 at Valleyway to Conklin. o Need to count Broadway, Valleyway, and Sprague • Car lot at Sprague and Conklin: Enforcement Issues • Can a light be put at Conklin and Valleyway? Trips -oo. do Apt. based on ITE Traffic Light Warrant Capacity: Senior Apts. l persons Apartments 1-2 persons 3 bedroom 3-4 persons 300+ automobiles at peak hour; therefore, no movements need to be reviewed. • Include Moore in Study Pedestrian/ Conflicts • Access to Conklin for development. Currently both accesses are to Valleyway only. • Moore extension to Sprague; no road projects in area. • There could be a possible problem with the Fire Department access; need to provide an access with crash gates that will be maintained during winter. • Trips and vehicles are too shy for this type of development; need to revisit • Has a traffic survey negated a development? o Standards and development sets new requirements. The development matches existing conditions. • Sidewalks may be provided along and added R/ W on Valleyway or others in lieu of development. • Loss of trees along Valleyway • If Valleyway is widened, who pays for it? • If the road is inadequate the county will determine a solution. o ADT o Width Collector Arterial • Construction traffic between Broadway and Sprague: o Steve will talk to the Traffic Operations Engineer. • The trip generation was based on standards; does this need a localized view? • Issues: Distribution Trip Generation Threshold limit = 195 d.u. • There are no other projects in the area. Hospice on Broadway and Conklin will not be included in this study. Next notification will be in late September . • The Transpo ~o SFp I S Gruup Z~40 M E M 0 RA ND UM T0: Scott Engeihard, County Engineers DATE: September 12, 2000 Steve Stairs, County Transportation Tammi JOnes, County Plan ing FROM: Bill White TG: 00121.00 Transportation Engineer SUBJECT: VALLEY WAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - TIA ADDENDUM This tinemorandurn is an addendum to the Valley RTap Residential Development 7Yansportatiorz Impart Analysis (TIA) submitted to Spok,ane County by The 'Iranspo Group on Auguat 30, 2000. The information is provided as a result of qucstions/comments highlighted in the September 13, 2000 review letter by Spokane County Transportation. Please review and contact our office with any further questions or comments. Original 'I'IA Conclosions As described in the Valley Riay Residential Development TTA, the proposed site would be located in the Spokane Valleq on VaIley Way east of Conklin Roa,d. Thc developmeat woulci be constructed prior to year 2005 and would consist of 120 loa-rise aparrment units and ?S attached scnior housing units. Local trip generation data, in coordination with In.stitute of Transportatiwn Engineers methodology, indicates that the project would generate approxdaately 1,750 daily trips and 114 PM pcak hour tripa 1'hese trips were distzzbuted to a study area defincd by thc pubLic and Spolane County to determine pro}ect iunpacts. Eiighway Capacity Manual level of service, arterial capacity, and t-affic signai warrant analyses were conducted in conformity with Spokane County gvideiines. The results indicate that the development wouLd have ininirnai impacts within the community and that sufficient existing arterial/interscction capacity was available for the growth of this project. Per established ~ The Iranspo . Gnoup County-impact fee requirements, the development would contribute $5,800 to the construction of the Sullivan Road/WB I-90 access loop ramp with no further mitigation being required. Addendum Analysis The intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue was Yughlighted for analysis by Spokane County and was inadvertently omitted from the Valley Way Residential Development TIA. An analysis was conducted to forecast project impacts at this intersection. Sullivan Road/Broadwaq Avenue is signalized with four intersechon approaches. -The signal is • fully-actuated with protected left-turn phasing on all approaches. The proposed Valley Way , Residential Development is located to the east of this intersection. Recent PM peak hour traffic counts were obtained for this intersection from Spokane County. A 3-percent annual growth rate was applied to obtain 2005 background traffic volumes. The 3-percent growth rate was recommended by Spokane County and is consistent with rates used in the TIA. In addition, forecast project traffic from Sonrise Land LLC, a proposed developnient on Broadway Avenue east of Moore Street, was added to background traffic to produce year 2005 without-project traffic volumes. The eadsting and future without-project traffic volumes are shown on Attachment 1. As stated, the proposed Valley Way Residential Developrnent would generate approximately 114 P1VI peak hour trips. Existing travel patterns were used to distribute these trips to the study area and approximately 35 percent of site-generated trips are anticipated to bravel through the Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue intersection. These trips are added to 2005 without-project traffic volumes to produce 2005 with-project traffic volunnes for the PM peak hour. Site generated trip assignznents and 2005 future with-project traffc volumes are highlighted on Attachmezrt 1. Levels of service-(LOS) classify intersection operations from LOS A, indicati.ng free-flow with little congestion, to LOS D, ind.icating high congestion with iong vehicle dela.ys. The LOS TransRortatinn and Traffic Engineering PC ANN/NG • OESlGN The , TiraHspo Group conducted for this analysis are based upon the methodologies outline in the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and conform to Spokane County guidelines. Synchro 4.0 by Trafficware was the HCM based software package that was used to conduct LOS for the existing, future without, and future with-project conditions. The PM peak hour results for the intersechon of Sull.ivan Road/Broadway Avenue are shown on Table 1. Tabie 1. Sullivan RoadlBroadway Avenue LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour Us6ng 2005 Without-Project 2005 UYth-Project LOS' Detay2 VlC3 LOS' Delay2 VIC3 LOS' Defay2 VlC3 C 21.9 0.71 C 30.4 .0.85 C 30.8 0.86 1. LOS = Level of Senjice. 2 Delay = Average vehicle delay expressed in seconds. 3. V/C = Volume fo Capacdy RaUo. Spokane County guidelines indicate that operations for signalized intersections are acceptabie at LOS D or better. As shown, the intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue operates acceptably at LOS C and should continue to operate acceptably at LOS in the future arith the addition of project traffic. Project impacts are also shown to be muzimal with less than a 1- . second increase in delay between future without and with project conditions. Synchro output . summary sheets are attached to this memorandum. . Summary This addendum to the Valley Way Residential Development TIA was provided to address project impacts at the intersection of Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue. Based upon a LOS analysis, the intersection would continue to operate accepta.bly at LOS C and development traffic would be responsible for less than a 1-second increase in delay. Project impacts at Sullivan Road/Broadway Avenue are anticipated to be min;mal and we have no fw-ther recommendations for this project. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99201 549/462-0606 FAX: 509J747-3317 N 1259 183 259 J' ~ 231 ~ 122 143 -0-- ~ 146 70 ]159 ~ 147 . . . ~ 94 • 853 ' County 1998 Tral(ic Cvunts ~ 1550 . 225 320 E 5'~i+ran' Roo4/8roodroy Avenut tnlosecfron , - 285~ 165 ! ~ 175 180 85 ~ 145 ~ 195 115 1050 Fulure 2005 Without-Project (Includes PipeEine Trotfc) 18 JL 4-; - 2 2 2 2005 Projecl Assignment 1553 ~ z ~ 225 338 J ~ L N 285 ~ 174 • 179 - 182 85 146 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS STUDY AREA 14s . 1052 Future 2005 With-Project •.~.i- . ~::>x~~.:~r ,~••Z;,;.._ o • x x;-vsr:--::•~= ~u~.V~:X~V Attachment 1 Sullivan Road/Braadway Avenue Interset,tion - E)asting and Farecast Traffic Volumes F~ ;:;3r,. - c:<i':. .,~..=.,•~r:. r . , . . -1 VQlley `YQy Residential Propertj (E) C:1401211AraphkU161liw09115N010:18 1; CaunN 1998 Braudww Avmue & Sullivnn Road . • , L• CounN 1998 Broadwav Avenuc & Sullivon Road lanes, Volumea, Tlmings Lanos, Vofumes, Tlmings J 1 ~ ~ ~ '1 1 P ~ l ~ ~ ~ 1 l t I' l ~We GrouQ EBL EBT EBR WBI, WBT WBR VBL Vj~6 j9R, 5BL SBT SBR Lane Oroup EBL E9T E, 8~ WBL W8T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S8T SBa Lane Configurallans ~ !1► ~f W+ 11 tf~ Welk Time (s) ~ 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk (e) 110 11.0 110 11.0 Lane WiQth (11) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Cafls (Nlhr) Q 0 0 0 Grade 1R6J 0°k 0% 0% 096 Lane Grp Cep (vph) 306 778 191 598 237 1821 488 1863 SforaAe Lenglh (fl) 0 0 Q 0 0 D 0 0 ufs Ralia Prot 0.14 0,08 0.06 0,07 0 09 0.20 0.08 0,30 5loraae lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 vfa Relio Parm To1al Lo91 Time (s) 30 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Cdlicel LG7 Yee Yea Yes Yes , leading Da1ac1or (fl) 50 50 50 50 5D 50 50 50 Act EBct Green (s) ~ 12,6 15.5 9.1 9.8 9.7 28.0 10.3 28,7 Trafing Deleclor (8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g!C RaUo ~ 0.18 0.22 0,13 0.14 014 0.37 0.15 0.98 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 vfc Ra1io 0.11 0.28 0.50 0.50 0,89 0.54 0,54 0.80 Lane Ulil. Factor 1.00 0.95 0,95 1.00 0 95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0 91 Uniform Delay, d1 28.2 15.5 30.4 14.9 29.8 17.5 28.5 19.8 Frt PrDtecled 0.951 0.932 0.985 0.981 Percentlle Oelay 39.3 17,1 30.8 15.7 38,9 11.8 29.3 19,8 Fil Protected 0.950 6.950 0,950 0,950 Percenille LOS D B C 8 D B C B SBId.Flow(prol) 1752 3333 0 1752 3267 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4946 0 Frt Perm, 0,951 0.932 0.985 0 981 Aree Type: Olher FII Perm. 0 950 0.950 0,950 0.950 Cycle Lenglh: BO Sald. f lotiv (perm) 1752 3333 0 1752 3287 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 Aclueled Cynle Lenglh: 70.8 Aighl Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Neturel Cycle: BO Satd. Flow (RTOR) 73 127 25 37 Conlrol Type: Actualed-Uncoordineled Headway Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Total lost Time- 12 , Volume (vph) 231 143 TO 107 146 122 159 853 94 259 1259 183 Sum of Cntical v!s Raltos: 0.60 Conll, Peds. (#lhr) Intersecllon vfc Ralio: 0,71 Peak Hour Facior 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 Intersecllon Percenlile Signel Deley: 21.9 Growlh Eedor 100% 4004G 100% 100% 100°a 100% 100% 100°k 10096 100°k 100'Yo 10046 Intersodion Percenlile LOS: C Heevy Vehfdes (°/o' 3% 3% 3% 39'0 3"/0 346 3°k 3% 396 3°/0 3% 3% Bus 6lockeges (blhr) 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spills and Phases: 1; County 1988 Broadway Avenue 8 Sulllvan Road Perking (!1!!hr) Mld-91ock TreIGc (°o) 0°b 0°~ 0% 0°~ m~ oZ ~ e3 04 Adj. F(ow (vph) 241 149 73 111 152 127 166 699 98 270 1311 191 14 ~ I 303 13e 23 s Lane Group Flow (vph) 241 222 0 111 279 0 168 987 0 270 1502 0 05 ♦ 06 07 08 Tum Type Prot Prol Prol Prat 13 s ~31 s Zo n Prolected Phaeas 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permllted Phases Deleclor Phaees 7 4 3 A 5 2 1 6 . Minlmum Inillal (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minlmum Spfit (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20,0 8.0 20.0 Talal Spli! (s) 18,0 23.0 0.0 13.0 20.0 00 19,0 30.0 0.0 14.0 31.0 0.0 Talal 5plit (96} 20% 29°,b 0% 16°/a 25°l0 0°,b 16°Yo 3956 046 18% 39% D% Mexlmum Green (s) 120 19,0 9.0 16.0 9.0 28.0 10.0 27.0 YeNow Time (s) 3,5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3,5 35 35 3,5 All•Red Time (s) 05 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 , LeadlLeg lead Lag Lead Lag lead Lag lead lag Leed-leg Optimize7 Yas Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gep (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 , 3.0 3,0 Time Belore Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recell Mode None Nane None None None Min None Min C,1001211L0S1Sul•Brd.sy6 Syndua 4 Report 01001211L0S1Su1•8rd.sy6 Synehro 4 Report Ibelrans-Q41 Oietrmis•[i4 I 1: Fulun Wilhoul•Pmitcl Braodwuv Avoiue & Sullivon Raed L Fulurc Widioul•Pcaiect Broadway Avrnue & Sullivnn Road Lanas, Uolumas, Tlmings Lenes, Ualumes, Tlmlogs , -.-N 'r 4- 4, t ~ `►1 ~ ~ --p. ti k 4, t /0 `►1 ~ Lane(3roup EBL E8T EBR WB WBT WBR N„_Bl NBI NBR SBL SBT SBR LaneGroup EBL EBT EBR Wel WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR §BL 88T SBR Lane Conliguretions 1 0 1 tA I ttl► 1) t"+T+ walk Time (s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash pont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Widlh (fi) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestdan Calls (#!hr) 0 0 0 ff Grede 09'0 0% 096 0% Lane Grp Cep (vph) 332 651 261 588 228 1898 523 2014 Slarege Lenglh (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vls Retio Prot 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.24 0,10 0,37 Starage Lenes 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 ule Retio Perm Tolal Loe1 Tlme (s) 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 Crilical lG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leadlnp Deledor(fl) 50 60 SO 50 50 50 50 50 Act Eflcl Green (s) 16.0 14,8 12.6 11.4 11,0 32.1 13.0 34,1 Tteiling Qetector (iq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adueted 91C Ralio 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.13 0,38 0.15 0 40 Turning Spead (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 vlc Ratio 099 0.42 0.58 0,61 0.89 0,64 0,64 0,92 Lane Ut+l. Feclar 1,00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1,00 0 91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 33.4 21.9 33.4 17.6 36,1 21.0 33.5 23,4 Fd Pralected 0.951 0 928 0,985 0.981 Percenlile Deley 57.6 219 33.9 17.5 87.1 21.9 34.1 305 Flt Proteded 0,950 0.950 0,950 0.950 Percenlile LOS E C C B E C C C Setd Flow (prat) 1751 3333 0 1752 3E53 0 1752 4980 0 3400 4940 0 Frt perm. 0.951 0.928 0.985 0.981 Area Fype; Olher FII Perm, 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Cyde Length: 90 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3333 0 1752 3253 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 Actuated Cycle Length; 84.5 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Naturaf Cycle: 90 Sa1d. Flaw (RTdR) 82 172 23 34 Controt Type: Aclualed•Uncoordinaled HeadweyFador 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 7otallastTime;12 Volume (vph) 285 175 85 145 180 185 195 1050 115 320 1550 225 Sum of Cdtical vis Ratios; 0.74 Canll. Pede. (afhr) Interseclion vfc Relio: 0,85 Peek Hour Fattot 0.96 0,98 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,98 Interseclion Percenlile Signal Delay: 30,4 Grovdh Factor 100°k 100% 1004'0 1009'0 100% 1009'0 100% 100°o 10096 106°/o 100% 1004'o Inlersection Percenlile LOS: C • Heavy Vehldes 39'a 3% 3% 3°/0 3°ib 3% 3°k 3°/0 396 5°/0 3°,'0 3q'o eus Blockages (Nlhr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spitts and Phases: 1: Future Wltheut•Project Braadwoy Avenue 8 Sulllvon Road Parking (Olhr) ` 01 ~ 02 ~ ~ s4 Mld•Blotk Tr2ffic 0% 0% 0°~ 0°~ 3~ 1B t 21 s ~ Adj. FfOw (vph) 291 192 89 151 1A8 172 203 1094 120 333 1815 234 Lane Group Flow (vph) 297 271 0 151 360 0 203 1214 0 333 1849 0 ~ og 1 a6, ~ 01 ce Turn Type Prot Prof Prol Pro1 la t =Ja7 9 Proiecled Pheses 7 4 3 8, 5 2 1 B Pertnltled Pheses Deteclor Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 8 Minimum 1nHial (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4,0 4,0 4.0 4.0 Minlmum Spfa (s) 8.0 10.0 80 20.0 B,0 200 8.0 20.0 Totel 5p111(9) 19.0 21.0 0.0 18.0 20.0 00 14.0 34.0 0.0 17.0 37.0 0.0 . Tolel Spllt (°h) 21% 23% 0°!o 20°k 22% 0°5 16% 384'o 0% 19°e 415b 096 Mexlmum Green (s) 15.0 17.0 14,0 16.0 10,0 30.0 13,0 33,0 . YellowTime(s) 3.5 3,5 3,5 35 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A9-Red Time (s) 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Leedlleg lead Leg Leed Leg Leed Leg Lead Lag Lead•Lag Oplfmlre7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehlcla Exlensian (s) 3,0 3.0 3,0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 Mlnlmum Gep (s) 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 30 Tlme Betore Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 ' 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Time To Reduce (s) 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0,0 Recall Mode None None Mone None Nane Min None Min C:1001211L051FW0 Sul•Brd.sy6 Synchro 4 Report 01001211LOSIfWO 5ul-Brd.ry6 Synchro 4 Repon Ilmtrstns•11541 . Uintrons-fT41 , • I: Fuluro With•Prajen Btoadwoy Avenue & Sullivsn Road . 1: Fuhue WiUa-Proieci Broadwev Avenue & SuUivan Roed Lanes, Valumes, T1mInRe Lanea, Volumes, TTmInAS . 1-►N k~ > e~ k 4\ t LeneGrouo E81. EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL 18R SBL 58T S13R LaneGrouo F-Bl, EBT EBR W8L WBT W8R HM NBT NBR SBL SBT S9R Lene Canfiguretians 1 0 1 0 1 lfl-- ftA Walk Time (s) 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.fl Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Donl Walk (5) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lene Width (8) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedeslrlan Calls (qltir) 0 0 0 Q Grade (96) 096 0°r6 0% 0% Lane Grp Cep (uph) 332 653 281 599 228 1852 551 2008 ' 5forege Lenglh (11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vls Rat(o Prol 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.08 0,12 0.24 . 0,10 0,37 Storege lanes 1 o t o 1 0 2 0 vls ReUo Perm Tota1 Losl Time (s) 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 30 10 30 3,0 30 3,0 3.0 Cdcipl LG7 Yes Yes Yes Yes leading Delector (R) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Ac1 ENct Green (s) 16.0 14.9 12.6 11.5 11.0 31.7 13.7 34,1 TreiBng Deledor (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aclueted gIC Railo 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.37 0.16 0.40 Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 vIc Ralio 0.89 0 42 0.58 0 62 0.88 0.66 0 64 0.92 Lane UIg. Faclor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0,95 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0,91 0.91 Unifonn Deaay, d1 33.4 21.7 33.5 11,2 36.1 21 7 33.1 23.5 FA Prolecled 0.851 0.927 0.985 0.981 Percenlite Delay 58.0 22.4 33.9 17,1 67.5 22.7 33.6 30.9 FII Prolected 0 950 0.950 0,950 0.950 Percentne LOS E C C 8 E C C C Sald, Flow (prol) 1752 3333 0 1752 3249 0 1752 4960 0 3400 4940 0 • Fr1 Perm. 0,951 0.927 0.985 0.981 Area Type: Ofher FIt Perm, 0.950 0,950 0.950 0.950 Cycle Lenpth: 90 , Sald. Flaw (perm) 1752 3333 0 1752 3249 0 1751 4960 03400 4940 0 Acluated Cycle Lenglh 84.8 Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Nalural Cycle: 90 Sald. Ffaw (RTOR) 79 181 23 34 Contral Type: Aduated•Uncaordlnaled Headwey Fecior 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Tata) Losl Time;12 Votume (vph) • 185 179 85 146 182 174 195 1052 117 338 1553 225 Sum of Crilicet vls Ral'ws: 0,74 Conp. Peds (klhr) Inlerseciian vlc RaUo: 0.86 Peak Hour Factar 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95' 0.96 0.96 0,98 0,96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 Intersecilon PercenGle Slgnal0alsy, 30,8 Growth Fedor 1~)09'a 100% 100% 10046 100% 100% 100% 1005'e 100% 100Sb 10056 10m Intamedfan Percenlile LOS: C Heavy VehICIES (°lo) 3°/0 3% 3°/0 3% J°ro 3% 3 10 396 99'0 3°/a 3°/0 3% Bus 6lackeges (#mr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Spllts end Phasos: 1: Fulure With•ProJect Bmadwey Auenue 8 Sulllvan Road Parking (INhr) I h91d-BIoCk Traific (g~e) 0°a 0% 0°,'0 0% ~ e1 It a2 `03 1'^91,m4 Adj. Flow (vph) 297 166 69 152 180 101 203 1096 122 352 1818 234 33s las Lene Group Flow (vph) 297 275 0 152 371 0 203 1118 0 352 1852 0 I ~ a5 ♦ a6 07 a9 TumType crot Prot Prot Prot 1e: i~zp, I Proteded Phases 7 4 3 S 5 2 1 6 Petmllted Phasee I Deteclor Phases ~ 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 ' Mlnimum inilial (s) 4.0 4,0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Sp01(s) 9.0 200 8,0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Tolel SpIA (s) 190 21.0 0.0 18,0 20.6 0.0 14.0 33,Q 0.0 18.0 37.0 0.0 ToSel Splll 214'0 23% 09,0 20% 22% 0% 16% 371% 03'0 204'0 41 % 04b ' Meximum Green (s) 15 0 17.0 14,0 16.0 10A 29.0 14.0 330 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 AII-Red Time (s) 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0,5 0.5 0.5 Leadfleg • LeaO Lap Lead Leg Lead Lag Lead Lag . Lead-Leg Opllmize7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yee Yes Yee Yes Vehicle Exlen9lon (s) 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Mlnlmum Gep (e) 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Time Belore Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 00 0.6 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 , Time To Reduce (s) 00 00 . 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Recaq Mode None Nane None Nane None Mln None Mfn C:1001211LOS1FWSol-Ord,sy6 SyndirodRcpoh C:16012111.051FWSul-Brdsy6 5ynchtn4Repon Ihthans•1`1141 thelron5•fT4I 1 . ~ ! , w • ~ I , g;iNr~~ N CALVIN ~ IN d c IVI ~ CALUIN [N CALVIN m • p ^ VAA E WAAAEN m ~qa;:; ~ ~ WAAAENWA AEN AARENJ ~ Z ~ a _ 0 cE LN ~ e i Ap m aoaM ~ Aoao o ~ H t~ MAACU RI• RI . . f ~ . ~ 69AA U8 10 1~ O r S ~ ~ CT 6llRN8 a N eo~s ~ BURNS t~`a~"~IU N6 UANS Z ~ l LN 8UAN8 ~ • UCll6 L PROORE88 ROAD ~ 4j~` • =8+ " ~ ~ At cHa 'aR ~ NEWER AB d~ 80 vM A C RD .Atl I NOYEA ro m ,NTU YCE TU ~ E Y 12 ~r m ~L R , • ` Q SULUVAN ROAD 1 ~ . b ION CT CD ~ NE x m . ~ , ~ ~ rn 4 raooAe n I q ; ESrEAO R pl ~ a s eAn ie N f°' ~ CANNEAY Rp ~ W << <y 8E?lEN lN ~<< e U ElN y CONKIiN . ~ w m m v~~ ' o q~ mr ~ t LIWAY HOLLYWOOD~LN 4 ~ CARNIN sHpMAO K 81 BNAMROCK . ~ I~ rwr~~r, r ~ , . . ~ r ~i • w ~ ~ m . STEEN ~ RD D 9TEEN LN ~ ;a ~ eL eae ' ' d8A8 0 A PL e 'a 12 ~ s~ a A n L'f A , A ~ ARC ? BPll BEII a ~ C 2 ~ 0 TBCI~IAIEY ~ a AC CT ~ p ~ ~ - S HIR E , ac~r~n~ev cr ~ ~ "R 9~, ' BCHIAL~Y . , . i~ j • V,~~~~ 8 - 2 B~oodecy Avenue 16 Z l l = ' ~ ~ Vofley Way ' "::f A. i{.•i ~ . . o 5% Sprogue Avenue 14 - ; - C4 ~ t a IAND USE SUAIMARI' a c APARTMENtS = 120 = SEMOR APTS. = 75 ~ 0 " TOTAL UNITS = 145 Phl PEqK HOUR TRfPS IN = 51 TRIPS OUT - 2) • TOiAI TFUP$ = 78 DAILY TRIPS ~ TOTAt TRIPS = 1,054 ~ - N~ rv:r:{n " : ' = i '.~j~:; ~.h:~: •';ti~.2'¢`{ Project Trip Distribution and Total Trip Assignment - PM Pea(c Hour ii: ~'r:•'?~.• Va11ey WayResidentioJProPe rtY . t~~`-%~'~^' .:iv"" • - v}'J.~ rii~~. ..n.._".... _ (c) c:0211gr2phic0l blilw0810210014:51 Transportatron and Traffic Engineering PLANNING - DESIGN UVilliam D. White 1'he Transportetion Plenner Tm ns O bill w@thetranspogroup, com Group The Transpo Group, Inc, 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washingtan 99201 5091462-0606 FAX:5091747-3317 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 20, 2000 ~ TO: Scott Engelhard CC: Bill White, The Transpo Group, Inc. Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning " FROM: Steve Stairs SUBJECT: TIA Addendum for the Valleyway Residential Project (ZE-20-00) SPWf COWiTY I have reviewed the above referenced document and find that it adequately addresses the comments contained in my September 13th memo. I recommend that we accept this study with the addendum and consider the conclusions and recommendations valid until December 31, 2005. If this project substantially changes or is not complete by December 31, 2005, an updated study, scoped by Spokane County, shall be provided. The updated study may require additional mitigation beyond what is currently proposed. The report, as required in the scope of work, addresses the use of Main Ave. right-of-way and states that Main Ave. will be used for emergency access. We do not see any problems with this project using Main Ave. as an emergency access, however, since this project has a large frontage on Main Ave., this project will be required to improve the roadway. The improvement will likely be in the form of paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk per Spokane County Standards. Since there is no off-site mitigation required for this project, a second neighborhood meeting will not be required. Instead, those residents inside the 400-foot notification boundary and those people that signed the attendance sheet for the first neighborhood meeting shall be sent a notice. The notice should briefly describe the results of the study and inform them that a copy of the study is available for review at the Spokane County Planning Department. If you have any questions concerning this traffic study or my review, please don't hesitate to bring them to my attention. 1'iansponabon and Trallic Engineer+ng Pt ANN/NG • DESIGN The REcEIVEp Transpo AUG 3 1 ~ ZOpO SPpKANE COUntrv ~~NtER M E M ORaNDUM T0: 5teve Stairs, County Transpartation DATE: August 30, 2000 Francine Shaw;;,y Planning FROM: B. ~II White TG. 00121.00 Transporta#ion Engineer SU6JECT: SUBMITTAL OF TlA FOR REVIEIN/APPROVAL - VALLEY WAY RESfDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT r Enclosed is a copy of the Valley Way Residential Transportation Impact Analysis for your review and approval. Copies have been submitted to Spokane County Transportation and p]anning. We understand the importance of public invotvement throughout this process. We found the citizen traffic scoping meeting to be informative and we feel that the Valley Way Study is more comprehensive as a result of the additional citizen scope items. The process and additional analysis has impacted the timeline for this project, however, and we request the most timely review possible. We feel that County and citizen concerns have been well addresstd in the analysis. Please tecl free to call our office if you have any questions or comments. I The TRANSPQ Group, lnc. 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99201 5091462-0606 FAX: 509/747-3317 , a _ _ ^ _ ~ - - _ : - ~ ~ : _ , . ~ - ` : _ - ~ _ _ - : ; ' • _ : _ . : - . ' . " ~ : : . _ - _ - ; ~ a - ~ ; 1 Z ~ - ;~~,1( _ - - . re- 62-r e 4te. Cv2,,," - - , ~✓l. ~ _ - - • • ~ ~ - ~ ; . - - ~ ~ - ~ = - . ' - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - { _ ; • ~ . tx . - .~r_ ~ ~ ~ ~ - `-.~-i'• y~ ~ _ - ' ~ - - ~ - - - ~ . - ^ I•`- . - + - • ' I • ~ C.'- J v 4:~ . V V T" " ~l ~ . ~ ~ - - u' ^-~•r . , .t •f• • . _ . ' ` - ~ • ~ , O~~-v~'_ ! T _ __"1 (P - - - : ' `1'?ItG-4 u.s e.S c-~\ ~ ~ - - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - - _ i J : - - - - - ^ ":'s+~i ~~~i'~ - "~t:N• ~id,.t~yi~ ~~._...r-~~• v°-L~, ~ 4';'•:v, - " ' _ ~ - , - - ~ - ' - ' " -r' - • - ' - ~ '^:i::.~.•.'. •,.^~~~.>NS=; ~~~:-..ti.. -i:i~':_ :~'~tiJ•-~~•''+•~''::.r'•.J;'it - _ _ • • i .'~t'_ .'I:i,; « .'c y~C~ :i~~`~:1~~ ,v ..~'r':.:' ~ • •w'fY~.r~.~7'.^~~~; ~ ',a•_'' - ' _ .~-r:.. ' • . . . . • _ ' ' ' " ' - . . ~ . . . ~ . _ - . - . : .ratffc Count Volumea OB 23-2000 '~,;iume ty Laae Rtport - D0526 Sta: 000000000003 Id: 000006274538 CId: 01 Fr[t: 600 - Imperial Int: 60 Mi:. Start: wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri .!:"j-1. 1. city/Town: County 1.ocatfon: Cbnklin Fv Lnl-South Ln2-Noz!t. we(i N.C: ta: ?2:00 51 53 104 13:00 54 60 214 14 : 00 34 65 15: 00 57 83 C16:00 38 74 11.- 37: 00 56 69 12=, :8: QO 63 77 I•; 0 19:00 63 52 1:5 20:00 54 40 -i 21:00 51 44 95 22:00 24 19 43 23:00 12 3 i5 2A:00 5 9 :4 baily Tot•:i:s ;52 04 8 Perccntages 46.45 53-r` Thu May 2-7, OI:OO 1 Y 02:Od 3 4 03:00 1 1 . 04:00 0 2 ? 05:00 1 7 8 06:00 6 21 ::7 07s00 25 42 08:00 36 62 ~e 49:00 37 55 _o:oo sz ss ic, 11:00 38 ~ 41 ~ 12:00 41 48 13:00 49 50 14:00 87 57 1 15:00 108 76 16:00 95 36 : 17:00 112 22 _ 19:On 15? 14 : TrcitLiC COllllt VOZUt 08-23-2000 %:-:ume by Lane Regort - Do. Thu May 27, ircq i,ane 1 2 Total 19:00 130 13 i 20:00 120 10 . 21:00 99 3 . 22:00 70 Z 23:00 61 4 24:00 17 0 Uaily Torals 13=3 ,•~9 2»2 PerCenCages 67.58 32.42 0::00 6 0 ~ 02:00 8 03:00 0 ~ Q4:00 0 05:00 B 0 06:00 10 0 07:00 47 0 08:00 104 3 1 09:00 90 7 10:00 91 1 11:00 43 1 Percentages 47.14 2.~ Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Counr volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by LanE Report - D0526006.PRN 11:15 Pg 3 - Sta: 000000000003 Id: 000006274538 CId: 01 Fmt: 600 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - N,ay 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - f4ay 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: Location: Conklin Rd - S- Sprague Ave File: D0526006.PRN Lnl-South Ln2-North Station Data Summary Lane 1 2 Total Grand Totals 2322 1309 3631 Percentages 63•95 36.05 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Lane 1 2 Total Am Hour 9-10 52 55 107 PerCentages 2.24 4.20 2.95 Pm Hour 17-18 163 34 197 Percentages 7.02 2.60 5.43 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count vozumes 08-23-2000 Volume by L•ane Report - D0526005.PRN 11:15 Pg 1 Sta: 000000000001 Id: 000006274538 CId: 01 Pmt. 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/TOwn: County: Location: Conklin Rd - N- Sprague Ave File: D0526005.PRN Lnl-North --------------------------------------------------------------------------.,.,eo------------------------------------------------------ Wed - May 26, 1999 Lane i Total 12:00 60 60 13:00 49 49 14:40 58 58 15:00 67 67 16:00 64 64 17:00 69 69 18:00 71 71 19:00 62 62 20:00 54 59 21:00 44 44 22:00 22 22 23:00 9 9 24:00 14 14 ooo=c~~~aavvav ccca~c Daily Totals 643 693 Percentages 100.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------ee-e------------------------------------------------- Thu - May 27, 1999 01:00 10 10 02:00 1 1 03:00 2 2 04:00 2 2 05:00 3 3 06:U0 10 10 07:00 20 20 08:00 45 45 09:00 30 30 10:00 39 39 11:00 44 44 12:00 58 58 13:00 56 56 19:00 60 60 15:00 76 76 16:00 82 82 17:00 77 77 18:00 56 56 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526005.PRN 11:15 Pg 2 Thu - May 27, 1999 Lane 1 Total 19:00 72 72 20:00 54 59 21:00 41 91 22:00 29 29 23:00 15 15 24:00 8 8 =o=cccc:s~~ssa ee~caa Daily Totals 890 890 Percentages 100.00 ------------------------------e_ee_o_o°-°-------------------------------------------------------------------------°°---------------- Fri - May 28, 1999 01:00 8 8 02:00 1 03:00 0 0 04:00 1 1 05:00 7 7 06:00 6 6 07:00 19 14 08:00 44 44 09:00 55 55 10:00 42 42 11:00 38 38 Daily Totals 216 216 Percentages 100.00 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffac Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526005.PRN 11:15 Pg 3 Sta: 000000000001 Id: 000006274538 CYd: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/TOwn: County: Location: Conklin Rd - N- Sprague Ave File: D0526005.PRN Lnl-North - Station Data Summary Lane 1 Total Grand Totals 1749 1749 Percentages 100.00 ----------------------------------------------e-e_°_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Lane 1 Total Am Hour 11-12 60 60 Percentages 3.43 3.43 Pm Nour 15-16 82 82 Percentages 4.69 4.69 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526004.PRN 11:15 Pg 1 - Sta: 000000000022 Id: 000045360627 CId: 01 Fmt. 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/TOwn: County: Location: Sprague Ave - E- Conklin Rd E/B File: D0526004.PRN Lnl-East Wed - May 26, 1999 Lane 1 Total 12:00 608 608 13:00 758 758 14:00 761 761 15:00 828 828 16:00 906 906 17:00 975 975 18:00 974 974 19:00 739 739 20:00 562 562 21:00 522 522 22:00 403 403 23:00 152 152 24:00 96 96 G G G D C C O C C C===~ C G G'C G G Daily Totals 8284 8284 Percentages 100.00 Thu - May 27, 1999 02:00 37 37 02:00 35 35 03:00 18 18 04:00 11 11 05:00 51 51 06:00 182 182 07:40 299 299 08:00 537 537 09:00 581 581 10:00 544 544 11:00 577 577 12:00 641 641 13:00 790 790 14:00 714 714 15:00 889 889 16:00 940 940 17:00 990 990 18:00 969 969 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526004.PRN 11:15 Pg 2 Thu - May 27, 1999 Lane 1 Total 19:00 661 661 20:00 619 619 21:00 645 645 22:00 526 526 23:00 250 250 24:00 92 92 Daily Totals 11598 11598 Percentages 100.00 Fri - May 28, 1999 01:00 56 56 02:00 40 40 03:00 16 16 04:00 14 14 05:00 70 70 06:00 184 184 07:00 315 315 OS:00 555 555 09:00 570 570 10:00 602 602 11:00 695 695 Daily Totals 3117 3117 Percentages 100.00 - Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526004.PRN 11:15 Pg 3 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------°°--°-°--seo_oeoo__o Sta: 000000000022 Id: 000045380627 CZd: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/TOVm: County: Location: Sprague Ave - E- Conklin Rd E/B File: D0526004.PRN Lnl-Eaet --------------°°--°-°--°_°_°--°--------°-------------e_o_--_e----------------------- - - - - - Station Data Summary Lane 1 Total Grand Totals 22999 22999 , Percentages 100.00 - Am/Pm Peak Hour TOtals Lane 1 Total Am Hour 10-11 695 695 Percentages 3.02 3.02 Pm Hour 16-17 990 990 Percentages 4.30 4.30 Spokane County Traffic Engineering TraEfic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526003.PRN 11:15 Pg 1 Sta: 000000000024 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 aC 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/TOwn: County: Location: Sprague Ave - E- Conklin Rd W/B File: D0526003.PRN Lnl-West wed - May 26, 1999 Lane 1 Total 12•00 653 653 13:00 657 657 14:00 635 635 15:00 694 694 16:00 795 795 17:00 847 847 18:00 805 805 19:00 619 619 20:00 961 461 21:00 382 382 22:00 236 236 23:00 142 142 24:00 68 66 Ddily Totdle 6994 6994 Percentages 100.00 - Thu - May 27, 1999 01:00 18 18 02:00 13 13 03:00 14 14 04:00 14 14 05:00 34 34 06:00 107 107 07:00 319 319 08:00 699 699 09:00 539 539 Z0:00 504 504 11:00 577 577 I2:00 633 633 13:00 689 684 14:00 603 603 15:00 788 788 16:00 780 780 17:00 876 876 18:00 760 760 1 5pakane Caunty Traffic Engineering TraffkC COUnC Vo}.umeS 08-23-2000 valume by Lane Report - n0526003,pRta 11:15 Fg 7 TFyu - May 27, 1999 Zane 1 Tota1 19:04 655 655 20:470 455 455 21:44 367 36? 22:40 209 209 23:90 123 123 24:00 51 51 Daily Totals 9$22 5822 Fercentagss 100.pO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,._,.w Fri - May 28, 1999 US:QO 26 26 02:a0 19 19 o3:0a ii ii 04:aa 25 25 05 : f70 45 45 06:00 103 103 0?:oo 295 299 0s:oo 61$ 61e o9:oo 613 613 10:oo 605 605 11:00 655 555 Dai].y Tatale 3D1,S 3015 Percentages 100.00 --------------------------------------eaases___s_________-___-_veee_e______.,t„__------------a___---_vmmeeonevevmmmo---___---------- Spokane County Traffic 6ngineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526003.PRN 11:15 Pg 3 Sta: 000000000024 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: Location: Sprague Ave - E- Conklin Rd w/B File: D0526003.PRAI Lnl-west --------------------------------------------------------------°°____ooe-°----------------------------------------------------------- Station Data Summary _o___°o--voe________ Lane 1 Total Grand Totals 19831 19831 Percentages 100.00 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Lane 1 Total Am Hour 7-8 699 699 Percentages 3.52 3.52 Pm Hour 16-17 876 876 Percentages 4.42 4.42 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Tra€€ic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526001.PRN 11:32 Pg 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------e-oe------------------------------------------------------- Sta: 000000000042 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End. Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: I.,oCation: Sprague Ave - W- Conklin Rd E/B File: D0526001.PRN Lnl-East wed - May 26, 1999 Lane 1 Total 12:00 390 390 13:00 517 517 14:00 470 470 15:00 553 553 16:00 7]9 719 17:00 860 860 18:00 852 852 19:0a 686 686 20:00 519 519 21:00 422 422 22:00 258 258 23:00 139 139 24:00 75 75 Daily Totals 6460 6460 Percentages 100.00 Thu - May 27, 1999 oa:oo 27 27 02:00 19 19 03:00 14 14 04:00 12 12 05:00 32 32 06:00 115 115 07:00 224 224 08:00 485 485 09:00 475 475 10:00 477 477 11:00 529 529 12:00 583 583 13:00 696 696 24:00 642 642 15:00 792 792 16:00 834 834 17:00 863 863 18:00 828 828 Spokane Cour.Cy Traffzc Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 volume by Lane Report - D0526001.PRN 11:32 Fg 2 - Thu - May 27, 1999 Lane 1 Total 19:00 688 688 20:00 516 516 21:00 436 436 22:00 304 304 23:00 163 163 24:00 51 51 Daily Totals 9805 9805 Percentages 100.00 Fri - May 28, 1999 01:00 36 36 02:00 23 23 03:00 19 19 04:00 14 14 OS:00 49 49 06:00 102 102 07:00 232 232 08:00 544 544 09:00 568 568 10:00 579 579 11:00 633 633 Daily Totals 2799 2799 Percentages 100.00 Spokane County firaffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526001.PRN 11:32 Pg 3 - - ----------°--see------- Sta: 000000000042 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: LoCation: Sprague Ave - W - Conklin Rd E/B File: D0526001.Pt2N Lnl-East Station Data Summary Lane 1 Total -oooo_ Grand Totals 19064 19064 Percentagea 100.00 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Lane 1 Total Am Hour 10-11 633 633 Percentages 3.32 3.32 Pm Hour 16-17 863 863 Percentages 4.53 4.53 Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526002.PRN 11:32 Pg 1 Sta: 000000000044 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Imperial Int: 60 h7in. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11.00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: Location: Sprague Ave - W- Conklin Rd W/B File: D0526402.PRN Lnl-West --------------------------------------aoo---------------------------------------------------------- - - Wed - May 26, 1999 Lane 1 Total 12:00 424 424 13:00 457 457 14:00 426 426 15:00 502 502 16:00 605 605 17:00 852 852 18:00 822 822 19:00 660 660 20:00 516 516 21:Q0 436 436 22:00 249 249 23:00 140 140 24:00 70 70 Daily Totals 6159 6159 Percentages 100.00 Thu - hfay 27, 1999 01:00 23 23 02:00 15 15 03:00 11 11 04:00 14 14 05:00 26 26 06:00 100 100 07:00 236 236 08:00 530 530 09:00 500 500 10:00 509 509 11:00 543 543 12:00 592 592 13:00 697 697 19:U0 640 640 15:00 771 771 16:00 810 810 17:00 830 830 18:00 793 793 ~ Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 08-23-2000 Volume by Lane Report - D0526002.PRN 11:32 Pg 2 Thu - P4ay 27, 1999 Lane 1 Total 19:00 653 653 20:00 501 501 21:00 431 431 22:00 309 309 23:00 161 161 24:00 53 53 Daily Totals 9748 9748 Percentages 200.00 Fri - May 28, 1999 01:00 34 34 02:00 23 23 03:00 13 13 04:00 18 18 05:00 SA 59 06:00 99 99 07:00 234 234 Q8:00 531 531 09:00 553 553 10:00 581 581 11:00 647 647 Daily Totals 2787 2787 Percentages 100.00 - / Spokane County Traffic Engineering Traffic Count Volumes 06-23-2000 Volume by Uane Report - D0526002.PRN 11:32 Pg 3 - - Sta: 000000000044 Id: 000045380627 CId: 01 Fmt: 000 - Tmperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Wed - May 26, 1999 at 11:00 End: Fri - May 28, 1999 at 11:00 City/Town: County: Location: Sprague Ave - W- Conklin Rd W/B File: D0526002.PRN Lnl-West - Station pata Summary Lane 1 Total Grand Totals 18694 18694 Percentages 100.00 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Lane 1 Total Am Hour 10-11 647 647 Percentages 3.46 3.96 Fm Hour 16-17 852 852 Percentages 4.56 4.56 IK d Transportation and Trallic Engineer+rrg PLANlUING • OESIGN RECEIVFD The Transpo _ J.UL 2 ) 2000 . Gnoup : s~OK'AnrE cOuNrY Er~ NOTlFICATION OF fRAFFtC SCOPlNG MEElI~ffe T0: Interested Attendees DATE: July 14, 2000 ~ FRON(: BiII White Transportation Engineer SUgJECT: NOTIFICATlON OF TRAFFlC SCOPIRlG MFET1RIG - VAI_LEY WAY PROPERTY Notice is hereby given that The Transpo Group and Storhaug Engineering on behalf of National Church Residences and Sonrise Land LLC will be hosting a Tra$lc Study Scoping Nieeting for the Vafley Way Residential Property. The meeting will be held on DVednesday, August 2, 2000 at the Valley Public Library located at 12004 E. Main Street from 5-7 p.m. The subject progerty is located south vf Valley Way and west of Conklin Street at 16110 East Valley Way. The current site plan includes approximately 1201ow-rise apartment units and 75 attached sen.ior housing u.nits, constructed on 9.01 acres. The property is currently zoned Urban Residential- 3.5 (UR 3.5) and a zone change to Urban Residential- 22 (UR 22) will be submi.tted with the development application. Access to the development will provided by two driveways located on Valley Way. The zneeting will focus on traffic issues pertaining to the developnnent and im.mediate area. After a brief introduction, the meeting will be open for public com.ment and garticipation is encouraged. The meeting is intended to assist Spokane County in refining a scope for the development traffic stuciy and environmental issues will not be discussed outside of the traffic arena. The meeting will be recorded and all oral com.ments will become part of public record. Written comments can be brought to the meeting or sent to Transpo and those received by July 31 will be included on the public record. Address specific questions regardi.ng the traffic meeting scoping process to: Transportation Department Spokane County 1026 Rlest Broadway Avenue Spok.ane, WA 99260-0170 Phone (509) 477-3600 The TRANSPO Graup, tnc. 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99201 5091462-0606 FAX: 5091747-3317 t . . i The Tiranspo' . . Group APPLICATION INFURMATION Agent- Bill White The Transpo Group 176 South Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 462-0606 AppL,.cant: Na5ona1 Church Rpsidences 721 North Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 (888) 576-1602 Propertv Ownei: Sonrise Land LLC . 11219 Sundown Drive Spokane, WA. 99205 (509) 622-3575 Location Description: South of Valley Way and west of Conklin Street at the address- 16110 East Valley Way. Description of Provosal: Project proposal includes approxinaately 9.01 acres of land, located generally at the southeast corner of Sonora and Valley QVay. Proposal is for 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units. The subject site includes one parcel that is proposed for development. Two driveways will access the site. " SEPA This proposal will be reviewed by Spokane County under their transgortation guidelines as it pertains to the State Environmentai Policy Act (SEPA). Comments will be accepted on • transportation issues related to the proposed action. Curreat Zo ' : UR- 3.5 (Urban Residential with 3.5 dwelling units per acre). - MEMORANDUM DATE: June 22, 2000 TO: Scott Engelhard , I CC: Bill White, The Trans o Group, Inc. FROM: Steve Stairs ac>'S SUBJECT: Trip Distribution Letter for the Valleyway Residential Project at 5POKW(;O~~ Conklin & Main ZE • Zo _ 00 I have received a trip distribution letter via fax for a residential project near the intersection of Conklin Rd. and Main Ave. I have been informed by Bill White, the traffic consultant for this project, that a rezone application has not been submitted to date, but is expected within the next week. Since I will be out of the office for the next two weeks, I recommend we allow this project to begin the traffic study process without a land use application. From the size and scope of the project discussed in the distribution letter, a detailed traffic study will be required. A requirement of the detailed traffic study is neighborhood meeting as stated in the current County Road Standards. This meeting shall not be scheduled prior to the filing of a rezone application with the Planning Department. A preliminary scoping worksheet is attached to this memo. Final scope of the study will be determined after the 1 St neighborhood meeting. With respect to the distribution letter, I request the following: 1. This distribution letter will need to be sealed by a licensed engineer that will be responsible for the conduct of the study. The engineer that affixes his/her seal shall be licensed in the State of Washington and have experience in traffic/transportation engineering. 2. If there is a site plan available, it should be provided with the distribution letter. Otherwise, some discussion of access to the site should be provided. 3. Please change references to Colton Street on Page 2 and Figure 2 to Conklin Road. If you have any questions concerning this distribution letter, please feel free to bring them to my attention. I Aq, Traffic Study Scope Worksheet ~ ~L`'~'' ^i A 9 Transportation Engineering Name of Project: A L-L-6`i w A--1 '0-S i D EiJ i /aU t~ e-o J e G-r Planning File Number: S-T-R: Lead Planner: Date of Scoping Meeting: Attended By: Description of Project: t 2C) wt rID Li, -7S 56AJ 1 LA `isW cr, Land Uses(if known): Project Phasing: Build Out Year: Public Scoping Meeting: Date: Time: : PM Place: Scope of Study ❑ Environmental Impact Statement %Traffic Study ❑ Other Study/Review ~ Intersections to Study: Au- S 1TE b 2~v ~~A ~ S P-o,4 W,4`~ ~ e d V,, 4 c s FO~I.t. 4F,`i L' cS 'rJK L /A.l 1 VA L-L6 r'VA L.' u n.! KLtt4 1 . 13 46A8 e`r4l ~ .S~t.Gca VAJ +..,(..1..1 tli4 /4 , . . Background Development Projects: S Nci . - y L4_1 c; Background Growth Rate: 7;~c Pass-by Traffic Rate: Site Distance Analysis: Area Transportation Improvement Projects (Planned/Scheduled): I~J,6 /J ~ Anticipated Directional Distribution of Project Traffic: s GG 3)% STe_1a $A i 1(\.4 L,E i,- P Other Comments: d nJ~ 4;,1) i•lr.c~B~~ v~= r k'lPS i'.~.,i-►-t ,S1n.C.LI ✓A t4 t2r?'I't'1 ir►2 P~c.~i~C/~t,~•~ ~ b,S 6ttSS thS 6 O A . + Final scope will be established after the first public meeting and upon receipt of a distribution letter and map from the project's traffic engineer. # This scoping document fulfills the requirements sct forth by Spokane County Engineering. Additional analysis may be required by other reviewing agencies. 6/O 1 /98 • NOTIFICATION OF TRAFFIC MEETING T0: Interested Attendees DATE: July 14, 2000 FROM: Bill White Transportation Engineer SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF TRAFFIC MEETING - VALLEY WAY PROPERTY Notice is hereby given that The Transpo Group and Storhaug Engineering on behalf of National Church Residences and Sunrise Land LLC will be hosting a Traffic Study Scoping Meeting for the Valley Way Residential Property. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 2, 2000 at the Valley Public Library located at 12004 E. Main Street from 5-7 p.m. The subject property is located south of Valley Way and west of Conklin Street at 16110 E. Valley Way. The current site plan indicates that approximately 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units would be constructed 9.08 acres. The property is currently zoned urban residential 3.5 (UR 3.5) and a zone change to urban residential 22 (UR 22) will be submitted with the development application. Access to the development would provided by two drivewa_ys located on Valley Way. The meeting will focus on traffic issues as they pertain to the development and immediate area. After a brief introduction, the meeting will be open for public comment and participation is encouraged. The meeting is intended to assist Spokane County in refining a scope for the development traffic study and environmental issues will not be discussed outside of traffic arena. The meeting will be recorded and all oral comments will become part of public recor(i. Written comments can be brought to the meeting or sent to Transpo and those received b~ July 31 will also beeome part of public recor(i. Aclcires5 slw.cific que_ stions about tlze traftic meeting sc*ing proccss tu: Transportation Dkj)arcment Spokane County 1026 West Broad%z ati' A%'entiis Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Phone (509) 477-3600 ~ % ONLY"THE.AFPLICANT AND ON3 SUBMITTING WRITTEN OR ORAL COMMENTS AT THE MEETING MA THE DECI3ION OF APPROVAL OR DEMAL OF THI3 BINDING SITE P r ~ - i ~ ~ APPLICATION INFORMATION Agent: Bill White The Transpo Group 176 South Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 462-0606 Applicant: National Church Residences. 721 N. Pines Spokane, WA. 99206 (888) 576-1602 Propertv Owner: Sunrise Land LLC 11219 Sundown Drive Spokane, WA. 99206 (509) 622-3575 Location Description: South of Valley Way and west of Conklin Street at the address 16110 E. Valley Way. Legal Description: A portion of the Tracts 25 and 26, Vera, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County Washington, and being described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the East half of the West half of Tract 26, hereinabove described; thence along the North line of said parcel, North 89°45'S0" West 163.62 feet to the Northwest corner of said parcel; thence along the West line of said Parcel, South 00°27'45" East 344.79 feet to al line parallel with and 268.0o feet Northerly of, being measured at right angles to, the North line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Spokane County for Main Avenue by Deed recorded June 23, 1958, under Auditor's File No. 54416808, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along sa.id West line, South 00°27'45" East 288.02 feet to the North line of Main Avenue; thence along said North line, South 89°44'13" East 810.53 feet to the East line of the West half of said Tract 25; thence along said East line, North 00°41'26" West 613.23 feet to the Northeast corner of said West half of Tract 25; thence along the North line of said Tract 25 thence along the North line of said parcel, North 89°45'SO" West 75.01 feet to a line parallel with and 75.00 Westerly of, being measured at a right angles to, the East line of said West half of Tract 25; thence along said parallel line, South 00°41'26" East 195.02 feet to line parallel with an 195.00 feet southerly of, being measured at right angles to, the said North line of Tract 25; thence along said parallel line, North 89145'50" West 242.54 feet the East line of said Tract 26, thence along said West line, North 00°35'S7" West 195.02 feet to the Northeast corner thereof; thence along the North line of said Tract 26 North 89°45'SO" West 327.24 feet to the said true point of beginning of this description, containing 9.01 acres of lane, more or less. • ~ Descrivtion of Proposal: Project proposal includes approximately 34.3 acres of land, located generally at the southeast corner of Holland Avenue and Colton Street. Proposal is for 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units. The subject site includes one lot that is proposed for development. Two driveways will access the site. SEPA This proposal will be reviewed by the Spokane County under their transportation guidelines as they pertain to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Comments will be accepted on transportation issues related to the proposed action. Current ZoninC. UR 3.5 (Urban Residential with 3.5 dwelling units per acre) , Traffic Study Scope Worksheet 4 SpTransportation Engineering c~ G~ Name of Project: ~ A-c_L-Ey wA--J e-~,: s 1 r~6, \i iA z- -P e-d J r~c. r Planning File Number: S-T-R: Lead Planner: Date of Scoping Meeting: Attended By: Description of Project: ~ Za rwt FD Lk -7~ ~6AJ(4JR, tkauS,nlCi Land Uses(if known): Project Phasing: Build Out Year: Public Scoping Meeting: Date: Time: : PM Place: Scope of Study ❑ Environmental Impact Statement %Traffic Study ❑ Other Study/Review I ntersections to Study: Au- S(TF_ b 2t v ~~,.1 ~4~( ~J.4-~ ~ C o l~t kC.~ 4 : , • ~ 0 416A8 kf4j ~ S"4u V AAJ \4 LL6y1-,) ✓A rl , . . Background Development Projects: SH-l-e..~r_y L4_1 ES 7-, Background Growth Rate: ~o Pass-by Traffic Rate: Site Distance Analysis: Area Transportation Improvement Projects (Planned/Scheduled): Anticipated Directional Distribution of Project Traffic: -S~G c3e4~1,h4 Other Comments: b t466,v ~•lu.r►~86 61- ae~ i~IPS ~ah--p-e.1t ra j~9._ t~~ P~ i+ c.,~/~►-7~ t4 ~ Z~IS~~c.SS lAS6 DF- 1,j'141,4 A V& - * Final scope will be established after the first public meeting and upon receipt of a distribution letter and map from the project's traffic eneineer. * This scoping docwnent fultills the requirements set forth by Spokane County Engineering. Addilional analysis may be required by other reviewing agencies. 6/0 l !98 Stairs, Steve From: Bill White[SMTP:BiIIW@thetranspogroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 2:00 PM To: 'sstairs@spokanecounty.org' Subject: Valley Way Residential Hey Steve, Storhaug contacted me and I reiterated what you told me concerning your review of our memo. (Not being able to review until the rezone application and fees is received.) He has indicated that they will submit that to planning next week (Monday or Tuesday), and wants me to complete the study ASAP (of course). Can Scott Engelhard sign off on the trips generation memorandum while you are on vacation, or does it require your writ?? If so, is there any way ' that you can indicate to planning your issues concerning the memo so we can proceed? I know you are busy, and I apologize if this causes any problems. I am being pushed, as usual. Ta ke ca re, William David White Transportation Engineer 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, WA. 99201 Phone: (509) 462-0606 Fax: (509) 747-3317 billw@thetranspogroup.com Page 1 JU i-19-H00 4 0 d. 0; 5~ ~F 509?~ ~33 7 00 Ah 'w!mhe I rci n s o Group 176 South Stevens Street • Suite 200 • Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 462-0606 • FAX (509) 747-3317 FAX TRANSMITTAL "--r Your InFormaGon n Response Requested re URGENT n Provided at Your Request Date; ~ Transm 77- it To: S~6.1115 Fax Number: `l , -I Number of Pages: ' (Indude this transmillal in cflunt) . From: t 1 v~ Reqarding: o6,~ TRANSPO Proiect Number: Comments: c! 4 j~ v-, ~ w U~.1 ct•.r i'v'c~ e CS' ~ e Y o~ ~ o~s. f~el L, ~ «P~ 4-ZJLle i't~, w C LP , . ! -I~P/ ' 1~ ~z,~,G~,~ -~,r CQ.1 1`a ✓G G~5 ~3 ~ ~~li ~ ~ ~ y pcJT ~ ~ ~l . ' Tr~rrsporr~r~orr an~ Tf~~r`c ~r~p+rr~ering P ~ A fY rY' r +7 ri JL 4~ + If 1~ Tiianspo GrouP . M E U 0 RA f~D U M ~ TO: Steve Stairs gATE: June 19, 2000 Spakane Caunty FRQM: B11l White 1 TG: 00121.00 SUBJECT: 11ALLEY WAY RESIDEiVT1AL PROPERTY - 7RIP DISTRIBUTiON AND AS~~~~~ENT SUMMARY This mernorandum summarjaes thO trip distribttta.on and assignment prapvscd for thc VB1],ey V.'ay I'4sidc.ntial 1`ropc:rty Trac:opostataor% Impar-t Ana]}■u-i-a ('Fi.&} in ti-se 9pca1=ne V:A-LI&y review the material and corLtact mewith aap quesrions. Proiect Deseriptzon The VaUe3+► Way Residential Fropcrty i.s locar,.ed south af VaIIcy Way and west af Corlklin Road in the Spak=e Valley, Figure 1 attached with this memorrandum shows the loc:ation of the site. The evrrent sitt p1an indicates that spproximar,e13► 120 law rise apartrnezYt units and 75 attachcd sem'or housing units wauld be constructed an approximately 9.1 acres of urban residential propeM. A rcquest for a zonc changa Lrom urbar► residential 3.5 (UR 3.5) to urban residential 22 (L1R 22) wi31 Ue ~submitted wifi.h the development applicatian. The de-vclapmen~ would be a=ssed through twa driveways lvc$ted an ~aUey Way. Ths driveways wau]d be stvp-cantraUed and would a]Iaw fult ingress/egress frQm sixYee inbound end autbonnd lanes. Agproximately 250 parh-ing staHs axe pro,posed for the 195 urrits, and sidewalls,s are planned i-nternelly ta accoasmodaxe pedestrian needs. Pretimiaary Scopc The Spok=e County was con#actcd in early 1Viay ta discuss a greli.rn.in~sy scope for the project TTA. BeLsed upvn these discussions, the sitc drivcways and the in~erseetioris of Brdadway Avenue fCariklin Road, Va1]cy WayfCvn}slAn Roaci, snd SpraVe Avenue j Conkian Road were idarai:iaed for vcss*kly~iA Prryj,-F1' itYbmr.Vt Are tO bB mmaIIIed bY Comraring w1L1out anCl wLth- prajcct conditions for the fareeast F1Vi pe.ak hour an a typica1 weekd.ay. Impacts wi]1 bc zu caourcd bv Coaiga►rsmg th a lvt•#Lst of 0 ervir-e -A Q ni I f liro-ri hy *1 f- 1C1q R HighwA y CA p-'Imi tv Manual. Transportation inaprovcments f tnitigation wi]1 be identified, if nceded. Public garticipation is importarit in thc County prejcct agproval groccss. An "open hause'" will be schedulcd for the prajecr in late June Jesrly July to irxtroduce the projcct a-nd the JU V-14-~000 0 d0; ~FA~, 509?4~33 )03 006 / Steve Stairs The June 19, 2000 T~ns o Page. 2 p Group appropriate notification process will be followed. Citizens will have the opportunity to ask questions and offer input on matters pertaining to traflic within the study area. We understand that the County may sltcr the scope oi the TIA based upon public participation proce as. Trip Generation The 1997 Institute of Transportation Engineers (iTE) Thp Gen.erahon Manual was used to estimate site-generated traffic. Approximately 1201ow-rise apartznent units {ITE Lend Use 221► a.ad 75 attached seaior housing unita (iTE Land Use 253) were proposed withthe curreut site plan. To be consistent, the ITE rates were used to determine trips on both a daily and PM peak hour basis. Table 1 sun+*+tAri~pa site trip gcneration for the typical weekday and the typical weekdsy PM pc,3k hour. Tabte 1, Summary of Valtey vVey ResJdential Property Trip Generabon Il'E Catagory ITE Land No. Oaify PM Peak Maur Trips Use Units Trips lnbound Outbound Total Low Rise Apartments 221 120 800 46 24 70 Attached Senior Housing 253 75 250 5 3 8 Total 195 1,050 51 27 78 As shown, the development would generate approximately 1,050 trips during the typical ' weekday and 78 trips during the typical weekday► PM peak hour. T'hese trips represent the development ttaffc "threshvld'' and we undeTStand that the scope of the TIA may be altcred if site pla.n nnodificativns result in additional trips. Trip Distribution Sitc generated uips were initially d.istributed to the study axra according to the trip patterns refltcted ia e:dsting eounts. Thcy wcee then adju$ted to account for the preuinity of major retail centers and arterials in relation to the site. Detailed trip distribution and the corresponding assigunents are showm on attached Figure 2. In general, approximately 75 percent of site generated trips were anricipated to/from the west of thc site via Broadway Avcnue, Valley Way, end Sprague Avenue. Approximately 20 percent of rsips were disturbed to/from the east of thc site by thc sa,me arterials. The remaining S percent of 3ite-generated trips were clistributed toJ1'ro olto~ Stnr>outh of Sprague Avenue. Ccn.1cj'~_ p- ~t JU~V-19-~000(4i0~~ 0;~8 ~NX, ~097413317 009 /006 Steve Stairs TlE June 19, 2000 TMnspo Pa.ge 3 Group Summary The 1.95 dwelling units proposed for the Valley Way Residential Property would generate 1,,050 typical weekday trips and 78 typical PM peak hour trips. Thcse trips will be distributed and assigned to the stu dy area as sho wn on Figure 2. '7 o0 . The scope for the TTA was initially developed in ay with the S_pokane County, fihe tiip geaemtion and distiibution highlighted for the devclopment should not be sufficienti to alter this scope. We do, howcver, understand that the Counry rnay alter the scope of the TIA based upon the input at the public "open house", and the scope may also be altered with any site plan alterataons that result in 3dditional site generated trips. ~ ~ • . _ L • f ~ . ~ \O ¢ ~ o R ~r F. • , ~ ~ L~III ~ ^ ..a a ~ D o ICAiYEMI 4b; wAkv A p;%~ ~ . ~ A ' Y A~N • AEN ' ~ -c , . C • . N : ~,s ~ ~ - • . • r,E t ~ • ' . ~ ~ ~ AQ1M 'ROAd p p- , • ~ M . . ' ~ ,u-4c1~ . ~ ~ ~ • ~I~I ~ ~ • . • . .w ~ • • ,c ~ h . • ~ BUAH9 D ~ ' ` IU N9 ~ ~ • ~ ~4 ~ , . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' . ~ ~ ' ~ I,VGIE I"~ : ~ • ~r, ~ PAOGAES3 RQAD ~ . . . • ~ ; ~ ~ ' ~p , . ~ ~ , ' ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . . ~ ~ • J47 CHA lf 11 ~t 6o. iU R a ' ~sA ~ h!1'~ER a 0 , m t e ou~ , ~ . o ~ ' • ' f AY m . Y + ~E tMy suLLivaN AOAD , . . . . i _ . ~ ION Cl ~ • ~ ~ ~ s ~ f . ' L fiE = T~ • . . . ~ ~ a . ; • m. ,ooM u ' bC RE ~ ~ ' ~ ~slu9lq • " ' i ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ I R ~ sTFqp , . rA11-1490Y Rn , . ~ • ~ , (y 0E1lENlN ~ • ~ ~ ~ COHNU i . . . • r. ~f:~ ~ ' , ; . • ~ rp . . ~ ~ . ~ urr,tr houYWoobtN CARNIN SHA~RO K 6f gHAIgAOClI . • , • . , ~ ~ . ' , , ~ , , _ ~ 0 , . ~ r • ~ ~rr~rr~ . . r . ~ { , • ~ w , 61EEN Rp $TEfN W • „ ~ , ~ ' . ~ • , el ~ f~~ , ~ ' • dER! D * .1 un" T72 Wm'm . • ~ . e C ~ CH S ~ ~ ~ ' P ~q~! } pA SELI w AL CT m AXC = • ~ . ; ~ O ;n~ Iip;RtEY ~ iCHU1LEY C~ ~ o KWIEY ' m S 41 .EY ' ~ ° o ' ~ . . . . . , _ . . . o v~ ~ - ~ 6~1,-) j4AU-- _ 16 2 ~ woy 1 '.59~e+vai'9Ytiat'4ti~C4[t. n•)+tiC ~3~r I+r1.rs,~ . . • ate ' f'~r.~ r,~: a;.w,~: p. , T 6 WP- 25% ~ . F~re 2 9Y : }VA Tnp DWYibukm aM TaW Tr[p AsMgment vd~y Way Rig;dmiarhrPoly , C:1r++er PrqlqrapFxbt Or WSW 10:17 , , 'RAFF`C 'MPA C" ANALYSIS for Valley Way Residential Deve.'opment Prepared for: Storhaug Engineering August 29, 2000 , ~~,t,acoooom~~ o°P A r~y 00,~ Prepared by: ~ 0 0~~; •••OE W pSy; o~D The Transpo Group, Inc. 6$ o 11730118th Avenue NE, Suife 600 ~ ~'s••~~~ 5~~~~=c? ~ Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 @ s, ~ ONAL (425) 821-3665 ~~~o•~° 'EXPIRES 3/15/ej ~ FAX.• (425) 825-8434 , TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ' INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 Project Description l Analysis Scope ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 Street System .................................................................................................5 Traffic Volumes ..............................................................................................6 Operational Analysis ......................................................................................6 Pedestrian/Transit Accommodations S FUTURE 2005 WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS ....................................................9 Planned Transportation Improvements ..........................................................9 Tra.ffic Volumes ..............................................................................................9 Operational Analysis ......................................................................................9 FUTURE 2005 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS .........................................................12 Trip Generation 12 Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Operational Analysis ....................................................................................14 ' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................19 FIGURES 1. Site Location .........................................................................................................2 2. Site Plan ...............................................................................................................3 3. Existing Traffic Volumes-PM Peak Hour ' 4. 2005 Without-Project Traffic Volumes-PM Peak Hour ........................................10 5. Project Trip Distribution and Total Trip Assignment - PM Peak Hour 15 6. 2005 With-Project Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour 16 ' TABLES , 1. Existing LOS Summary - Weekday PM Peak Hour 8 2. Future Without-Project LOS Summary - Weekday PM Peak Hour 11 3. Summary of Peak PM Generator Characteristics ................................................13 4. Summary of Valley Way Residential Property Trip Generation ...........................13 5. Future 2005 With-Project LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour 14 ' ValleY WaY Residential DeveloPmenf Au9ust 29. 2000 ' INTRODUCTION ' This report summarizes the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the Valley Way Residential Development located in the Spokane Valley east of the City of Spokane. The scope of this document was developed in coordination with Spokane County, the project team, and Spokane Valley citizens and follows Spokane County guidelines as they pertain to traffic studies under the State Environmental Protection Act. , ProJ'ect DescriPtion The Valley Way Residential Property is located south of Valley Way and west of Conklin Road in the Spokane Valley. Approximately 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units would be constructed on 9.01 acres of urban residential property. A request for a zone change from Urban Residentia13.5 (UR 3.5) to Urban Residentia122 (UR 22) will be submitted with the development application. The development would be accessed through two driveways located on Valley Way. The ' west driveway is pri.marily proposed to serve the low-rise apartments and the east driveway would serve the senior housing. No cross vehicle access between the apartments and senior housing is proposed. Both driveways would be stop-controlled and would allow full ingress/egress from single inbound and outbound lanes. Approximately 260 parlaxig stalls are proposed for the 195 units, and sidewalks are planned internally to accommodate pedestrian needs. Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed development and Figure 2 shows the current site plan. Analysis Scope The scope for this analysis was developed in coordination with the community, the project team, and Spokane County. The site driveways and the intersections of Broadway Avenue/Moore Street, Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street, Valley Way/Conklin Street, and Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street have been identified for detailed analysis. This study area ' was identified based on a review of project traffic generation and distribution to assess potential project impacts. The Valley Way Residential project should be complete by 2003. ' Year 2005 was selected as analysis horizon year to evaluate operations with the completion and full occupancy of the project. Typical weekday PM peak hour intersection , M:100100121100121r1.doc O The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 1 !:5•. ~?'Y.~S%X^ii;~;i:C•~ (7 1N ' ~ c~ . fi •`.'t't%,>::>; W •F,.,;;~.:,.~;:~.:,.., N ALVIN ~a :~:;:;~i~:~::C:~: • D ~r r~ .h~ i ' 5.:::':'f.' ~ v i;;;,~;, ~ CALVIN ~~N CALVIN LN m 9 LYIN D'~ r~ D CALVIN 0 R~I VARREN WAAAEN ~ FZ m~ A D WARREN ~ WA AEN m,_; Z r a ARREN/ G5 Z ELN ~i i IA D m== ADAM m ROAD p~ Maecu b1ARl• MAACU9 ~ ~ io ~adw 0 `.;~:;t::~; <>:~; ~ o BURNS RO R1 ~ . a W CT ~ BURNS a a BU m BUANS ~ O ~ UAN3~ 9!~ NSs N~9,J = ~ 1" y o ~N ~ ~ ~ < LUCILE L 1 D ~ ~ fD Q PR06RESS ROAD T ~ ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ I~► 16T CHA lE9 ~ o dc~~g o i 8064M 'R Od ~ H °l a; iA ~ NEWER~~ S 3 o m O M~ R D ~3' A tl N ER ~ p :NTU Y W CE TUAY ~ CEF~TURY N ~ ~ll DR o ~SULLIVAN ROAD m 0 ~ ION CT C.0 ' , A Z = m , NE a ~ ~ a0 < m ' ~ I m ~ M00AElN .~mOQAE I R F$ qor~ HO E8 'EAD lN CANNEAY RD A ca 'p ; ~ BETLEN LN ~ BUELN y , CONKLIN ; . U)ms • , c9i m ~D LIWAY ' m ~ o HOLLYW000 LN ' Z~ CARNIN SHA zROo'K ST SHAMROCK . c ~a • a z° ~t D I~ ~rrr~y C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ♦ m ♦ ♦ , . ~ • , ,%STEEN RD STEENIN o ;z BLiFBQ ~s a Z 1a JFpgY Pl o; . ~a Ap ~ a Iqt C¢A N07Y t~A LNY RQD OOE4 p Q ~ ~ C3 C A • ~ ~ D ~ . O m N i m ARC R Bell y z BELL ~ m D r a zO r, AC CT AAC Q m ~y 0 y~ TSCfIALEY ? m ~ 84HIRLEY CT r- Z S HIR EY Rp - . . . rj9cHIAlEY.. ~T ~ ~ , N 1 ' 1 . „ 8 p ry II fl p II B n o ' u e Q A 0 A ~ u n~ n u' o VALIEYWAY y i _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ •'~-s'' - - - -i ; - .~i~fi~'~ . ' t ~ ~ . ~ : f ~i+.~ ~ ~ •'~'L I I r« 3~ ~ ~ ~ I , ` I I g . _ I ~ : Nl..t•.~ • • ' . ~ l~L S . l ~ ' . ~ t ~ ' ~:'t•:. " - , r..ra..~cc w,~o.~e u.is ( mnan ~ s+osc: ~ Ioo• t*p.l R C C R C A T I 0 N A R C A a' . . I : COMD" H::_' ::r::: ~ ~ . .w ~ . I • 4 ~ : f r - --j ~ I f 7 1/2 SiOa[S t p t ~ ~t' (T9J :S `"r?:.. ' . . 1!~lMli I SLAOI ~ ~•"`v: ~ 'v' L~ t STd![S I 15 WtS I 2 ~ ~ J STdt[S # ' s I ic`::t.~•_"' ' P~': , '.~s`•r;•:;•:' ~ i r • ( ~ I t'r':;{~;;:; : i I ~}..3 ~ . ••.u•r).v:~• . < I ' S'•': ' . ` w • ~'u` ti{v.v r .~~.s ~w ~ t} _•••u-~`.; ~ ~ ~ t140, : ~:'3:~:-. ~ t ( F L, ~{r " . "w . . F . ~ ~:?'r~'.}:<:}}v:; . ""r'.. • ~ • ' ~ . . • ;•ti• . . r :~i~r ~ i:':'= . I f . ; . . ~ : . . _ . . ~ , . . ~ : : , . fi~ • . . r = 3 ~ Jt tif ~ I V . { I ~ n , _ ~y} l ~ _ .v~! ~ ~ - . - I I { r.~. t~ S C . 4.i>::>::•.4r =+c,y'<;. y~; _ yp" I SEKVN ' I - - rma. ~o wn rma, u um - - - - - ~ smM - - - I 1/7 sroacs v 1r7 srOOs _ J ~ f7 I- _ •:vr::~;,••:~: ~ _icy.: 5 . , ..t•-;~ . . .t....•~.~ ~ f •r r • . ~ - , --•::.'z•_:, . . . . ~ j ' Y101 WwOtf 1MqX J • ••4v , - . • YAIN AVENUE ~ (UNIMPROVED IbCHT OF WA17 aj . . . . - - .:::::Figure 2 Site Plan ValleY WaY Residential ProPe rt1' (A) C:1001211graphic02 bilhv 003/001625 ' ValleY WaY Residential DeveloPmenf Au9usf 29, 2000 ' operations were uscd to gauge project impacts. Impacts were measured by making a , comparison of existing, future 2005 without-project, and 2005 with-project cond.itions. The methodology for this analysis was coordinated with Spokane County. ' Public Participation 1 A community meeting was held in August of 2000 to discuss area traffic issues and transportation-related concerns. Property owners within a 400-foot proximity of the t development were mailed meeting notifications. In addition, a Spokesman Review newspaper notification and a 4-foot by 4-foot notification sign on-site were used to alert others of the meeting. Public commentary/concern was bascd upon knowledge of local traffic issues and in response to preli.minary trip generation and distribution information presented at the meeting. Spokane County used this information to help refine the scope of the development TIA and the primary issues, and the County scope refinements, are as follows: ' • Trip Generation. Site-generated traffic was originally developed with the use of the Institute of Engineers Tnp Generation Manual and this uiformation was presented at the meeting. General public consensus was that ITE trip generation was insufficient for the area and the Spokane County has required a trip generation analysis as part of this report in confirmation. • Trip Distribution. Preliminary site trip distribution was presented at the meeting and it was generally felt that too much traffic was proposed to utilize Valley Way west of the site. Adjustments have been made and confirmed with Spokane County and the results are reflected in the analysis. ' . Moore Street. Several concerns were expressed over the potential for cut-through traffic on Moore Street. The intersection of Broadway Avenue/Moore Street was ' added to the scope of this analysis to assess the potential for cut-through traffic and determine impacts. • Valley Way. There was concern over the ability of Valley Way to accommodate site- ' generated trips. A capacity analysis was conducted to address the concern. ' ' M:100100121100121 r1. dac O The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 4 , Valley Way Residenfial DeveloPment Au5ust 29, 2000 , EXISTING CONDITIONS ' The existing conditions analysis was developed to establish a base condition for comparison against the future without and with-project conditions. In this section, a description of the existing arterial system and a summary of existing intersection operations were provided. Street System There are four primary arterials located within the study area. Near the site, Broadway Avenue is a principal arterial with 4 lanes and S-foot sidewalks from Sullivan Avenue to Moore Street. Approximately 100-feet east of Moore Street, the arterial drops to 2- lanes with 1-foot gravel shoulders. The arterial provides access to residences and residential arterials and has a posted speed li.mit of 25 mph. Spokane County traffic counts near Conklin Street indicate that approxinaately 7,000 to 10,000 vehicles use Broadway Avenue per day. Valley Way is a collector arterial with 2 lanes and 1-foot gravel shoulders. The arterial also provides access to residences and residential arterials and has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Approxi.mately 1,400 vehicles use Valley Way near Conklin Street per typical weekday. The development is located adjacent to the arterial west of Conklin Street and two driveways will access the site from Valley Way. Sprague Avenue is a 5-lane principal arterial that maintains between 16,000 and 23,000 vehicles per typical weekday near Conklin Street. The arterial is a pri.mary east-west comdor for the Spokane Valley providing access to several principal, minor, and collector arterials. Sidewalks, curb, and gutter are continuous on both sides of the facility and the posted speed is 35 mph. Conklin Street is a residential arterial with 2 lanes and 1-foot gravel shoulders. The posted speed limit is 25 mph and an estimated 500-800 vehicles utili2e the facility per typical r,weekday. The site is located west of Conklin Street and south of Valley Way. Main Avenue right-of-way (ROW) is located clirectly adjacent to the south of the site. The project proposes to clear and maintain the Main Avenue ROW as a utility easement and an emergency access. Currently, no traffic uses this section of Main Avenue and there were no trips assigned to it in the future. C ',iCr ro` C 6' , r The study area intersections are stop controlled and a brief description of the intersections are as follows: Broadway Avenue/ Moore Street is a"T" intersection with two lane approaches on Broadway Avenue and a single-lane approach on the Moore Street approach. There are no designated turn lanes at this intersection and a stop sign is used to control the northbound approach (Moore Street). M:100100121100121r).dac 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 5 Valley Way Residential Development Augusf 29, 2000 , • Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street is a'l' intersection with single-lane approaches (no turn lanes). A stop sign is used to control the northbound approach (Conklin Street). • Valley Way/Conklin Street is a four-way stop controlled intersection with single- lane approaches. • Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street is a four-legged intersection with stop control on the north and south legs (Conklin Street). Turns are allowed from the two-way left- turn lane on Sprague Avenue, and there is a left turn lane on the northbound approach. Traffic Volumes The PM peak hour represents the highest traffic volumes for the typical vveekday in this area. As such, the PM peak hour was chosen as the primary focus of this analysis in accordance with Spokane County guidelines. The peak hour for each individual intersection within the study area typically occurred between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. Traffic counts were conducted in April of 2000 to assure that intersection analysis was being conducted with recent data. The existing weekday PM peak counts are summarized on Figure 3. Operational Analysis An operational analysis was conducted for this report according to the level of service methodology outlined in the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of traffic flow and congestion for signalized and stop-controlled intersection. At stop-controlled intersections, LOS is defined in terms of the delay for the worst approach or approach movement delay. LOS values range from LOS A, ind.icating free flow traffic conditions with little delay, to LOS F, representing extreme congestion and long vehicle delay. Appendix A includes a more detailed description of LOS and associated criteria. ' • As noted previously, existing LOS analysis was conducted for the study area intersections during the weekday PM peak hour. The analysis was conducted with the latest release of the Highway Capacity Manual Software, version 3.1c by McTrans. This software application is based upon the methodology outlined in the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. , Spokane County guidelines maintain LOS E as the mirLm_um threshold for unsignalized intersections. Transportation improvements are typically considered at intersections that below this threshold. Table 1 summarizes the LOS analysis conducted for the study area during the PM peak hour. Appendix B contains the detailed LOS sum.mary worksheets. M:100100121100121ri.doc 0 The Transpo Group, lnc. Page 6 ' N 198 277 ~ - 185 8~ r 1 26---) ~4 8 3 Broodwoy Avenue ~ >J f J F ` ~ 1 3 t • t t t i i i t ~ 1 i ; VOII2y WOy ,t~:;rh:oti•r;:.~:.;.1 s:s, y ti y;yy;.,~.::•.:• : N ;f . • - ~ ?{~.::?}Y.•::•}{y?:,v..;;.;•i~y~;yZ'`,i t p ,;:{:•i:{::•:}i.; r~•,::v r:~~~'~+4: o : :;:.yr;., ~:,ti• ~ v~~i~ . . i ~ ~ t $progue Avenue ~ t 4 17 24 7 ~ 2 7 , 21-) --7 ~ ~ ~ 5~ ~3 866 -765 N 24 - 12 10--) (-29 Y 10~ (-5 10 47 7 6 6 16 . . ~ Flgure 3 Existing Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour •r::::.. ?Valley WayResidential Property • ~ r:x~:;:: . , (E) C:1001211graphic01 biliw 0828/0011:43 Valley Way Residential Developmenf August 29, 2000 ' Table 1. Existing LOS Summary - Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS' Delay2 WM3 ' Broadway AvenuelMoore Street B 11.0 NBA Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street B 12.1 NBA Valley Way/Conklin Street A 7.3 SBA , Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street C 20.1 NBL 1. LOS = Level of Service. 2. Delay = Average vehic/e delay expressed in seconds. 3. WM = Worst Movement. (NBA = Northbound Approach, NBL = Northbound, SBA = southbound approach) As shown, all of the study area intersections operate at LOS C or better with existing traffic volumes. LOS C is well above minimum thresholds and suggests that capacity is available for future growth. ' ' Pedestrian/Transit Accommodations . ' There are no pedestrian facilities located within the i.m.mediate proximity of the project. The lack of facilities was expressed as a citizen concern during the August meeting. The development is responsible for constructing sidewalk along the project front on Valley Way on at least one side of the arterial. Valley Way serves as the pri.mary access to the site for pedestrians and bicyclists. ' it Authori o erate Spokane Trans ty p s 2 routes wYthuz reasonable proximity of the project. Route 82 operates on a 30-minute headway on weekdays and can be accessed from Sullivan Road. The route circulates between the Valley, Greenacres, Otis Orchards, and Liberty Lake. There is no service on weekends. Route 90 can be access from Sprague Avenue or Sullivan Road and circulates between the Downtown Transit Plaza, the Valley Transit Center, and the Sullivan park and ride via Sprague Avenue and Sullivan Road. The route operates on 15-30 minute headways on weekdays and a 30-60 minute headways on weekends. Typical operations are between 6 AM ' and 11 PM for both routes. , , M:100100121100121r1.doc 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 8 Valley Way Residenfial Developmenf August 29, 2000 , FUTURE 2005 WITHOUT-PRQJECT CONDITIONS , This section of the report establishes the 2005 without-project conditions. Future without-project traffic volumes and estimated intersection operations are evaluated and documented for comparison against the with-project condition. Planned Transportation Improvements Spokane County has indicated that two proposed improvement projects may effect the study area prior to the 2005 horizon year. Spokane County, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and local developers are coord.inating to construct loop ramp from northbound Sullivan Road to westbound Interstate 90. The ramp is in the design phase and should be constructed by 2002. While the ramp intersection is not within the study area, the planned i.mprovement would provide regional access for the proposed development. A signal is proposed at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. The signal is a condition of approval for the Shelley Lake Estates Residential Development and the County has indicated that construction will begin when particular signal warrant and operation thresholds are met. The signal was not included in the future conditions of this analysis because operational thresholds were not surpassed. An analysis was conducted, however, under future with-project cond.itions to determine whether the signal was warranted under Manual of Uniform Control Device methodologies. Traffic Volumes ' Year 2005 without-project traffic forecasts were determined by applying a three-percent annual growth rate to the existing PM peak hour and daily volumes. The growth rate was provided by the Spokane County and is consistent with historical traffic growth trends for the ' area. Based upon information from the County, the Shelly Lake Estates Residential Development is pipeline project located south of the study area. Shelly Lake traffic is not anticipated to significantly impact the Valley Way Residential study area. It was con.firmed with the County that the 3-percent annual growth rate would sufficiently account for Shelly , Lake traffic and also reflect traffic from other potential pipeline projects outside of the study area. Figure 4 summanzes vvYthout-project traffic volumes for the forecast 2005 weekday PM peak hour. Operational Analysis The results of the LOS analysis conducted for the 2005 without-project conditions are summari zed on Table 2. Existing LOS are also provided for the purpose of comparison. M:100100121100121 rl. doc 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 9 N 1 ' 345 - - 225 320 - 215 10-) (-5 30-) ~5 10 5 15 5 ' Btoodwoy Avenue f 3 j 4 1 i ~ ' VOlley WOy a~ ' o . ' ~ _ - - - # i i ~ S ~ Sprogue Avenue i f ' 5 20 30 10 ~ 5 10 7 25-) (__10 1005 = 885 N 30 = 15 15--) ~35 Y 15-) ' 10 ,5 55 10 ,o ,o zo . . . . - . igure 2005 Without-Project Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour , •,1 ,'.h•..~. Y=Yall W Residential ProPe eY aY rtY (B) C:1001211graphic0l btflw 08/28I0011:43 ' Valley Way Residentia! Development Au9usf 29, 2000 ~ Table 2. Future Without-Project LOS Summary - Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Without-Project ' Intersection LOS' Delay2 WM3 LOS' Delay2 WM3 Broadway Avenue/Moore Street B 11.0 NBA B 11.5 NBA ~ Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street B 12.1 NBA B 12.6 NBA Valley WaylConklin Street A 7.3 SBA A 7.4 All Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street C 20.1 NBL C 25.0 NBL ' 1. LOS = Level of Service. 2. Delay = Average vehicle delay expressed in seconds. 3. WM = Worst Movemenf. (NBA = Noifhbound Approach, SBA = Southbound Approach, NBL = Norfhbound, AU = approaches movements) ' As shown, all study area intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or better with the expected growth in background traffic. LOS C is above minimum thresholds with available capacity for future growth. ' ' ' ' ' ' M:100100121100121 r1. doc 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 11 , Valley Way Residentia! Development August 29, 2000 ~ FUTURE 2005 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS , , This section evaluates transportation-related project impacts. Site generated traffic is summarized and distributed to the study area for operational analysis. This analysis is , compared to the 2005 without-project analysis to determine project impacts. ' Trip Generation Site trip generation was based upon the methodology outlined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Traffic counts were obtained to calibrate ITE methodology to local conditions. This section summarizes the steps used in the trip generation calculation process. Trip Generation Analysis , The ITE Trip Generation Manual is a nationally recognized tool used for developing site trip generation. Commercial and residential land uses are summarized in categories and each individual category has unique trip generation characteristics that were developed through surveys and counts conducted at various locations throughout the nation. ' Approximately 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units were proposed with the cunent Valley Way Residential site plan. The most similar land uses in the ITE are Land Use Categories 221 and 253, respectively. Preli.minary trip generation was , developed using ITE rates and presented to the public and Spokane County at the August 2000 meeting. The public generally agreed that ITE trip generation appeared to be low based upon a local familiarity with the area and the County requested that a trip generation analysis be conducted for comparison against the ITE. Four locations were selected for analysis within the Spokane/Coeur D' Alene area. 'I`wo ' locations were occupied with low-rise apartments and two with attached senior housing. Traffic counts were conducted at site dnveways between 4 PM and 6 PM and the lughest hour of site-generated traffic, known as the PM peak generator, was identi.fied of for each location. ' Peak PM generator rates were estabhshed by divicling srte-generated tnps by the number of site units. Weighted averages were determined, respectively, for the low-rise ~ apartments and the attached senior housing. The calculated average rates were compared against the peak PM generator rates identified in the ITE for Land Use Categories 221 and 253 to develop local trip generation calibration adjustment factors for low-rise apartments and attached senior housing. Table 3 suznmarizes the trip generation characteristics of the four sites surveyed and highlights individual and weighted average peak PM generator rates. Appendix C contains driveway count summary sheets used for the trip generation analysis. M:100100121100121r1.doc 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 12 ' Va!!eY WaY Residential Developmenf August 29, 2000 ' Table 3. Summary of Peak PM Generator Characteristics Description Location No. PM Generator Trips/Rates Units Inbound Outbound Total Rate/DU t Low-Rise Apartments 1905 W. APplewaY - CDA 110 59 39 98 0.89 Low-Rise Apartments 692/698 W. Wilbur - CDA 105 37 39 76 0.72 ' Weighfed Average of Low Rise Apartmenfs=0.81 ITE Low Rise Aparfinenf Generator Raie per DU 0.62 Low-Rise Apartment Trip Generation Adjustrnent Factor = 1.31 Senior Housing 7712 Heartland - CDA 38 8 7 15 0.39 Senior Housing 3755 N. 4th St. - CDA 80 12 8 20 0.25 Weighted Average of Low Rise Apartments=0.30 ITE Low Rise Apartment Generator Rafe per DU = 0.11 Senior Housing Trip Generation Adjustment Factor = 2.73 ' CDA = Coeur D' Alene ' Adjusted Trip Generation ITE Trip Generation Manual rates were used to establish a base for determ.ining site trip generation. As shown on Table 4, a total of 1,050 typical weekday trips and 78 typical weekday PM peak hour trips would be generated by 120 low-rise apartment units and 75 attached senior housing units accord.ing to ITE methodology only. ' As stated, ITE trip generation methodolog,y is developed from national survey information and this does not necessarily reflect local trip generation characteristics. To ' calibrate weekday and PM peak hour trip generation to local conditions, the calculated low- rise apartment and attached seruor housuzg tnp generation adjustment factors were apphed to ITE trip generation. The results for the adjusted weekday and weekday PM peak hour are shown on Table 4. ' Table 4. Summary of Valley Way Residential Property Trip Generation Land Daily PM Peak Hour Trips Adj. Adjusted Trip Generation ITE Catagory Use Units Trips In Out Tot. Factor Daily PM In PM Out PM Tot. , Low Rise Apartments 221 120 800 46 24 70 1.31 1,050 60 32 92 Senior Housing 253 75 250 5 3 8 2.73 700 14 8 22 Total 195 1,050 51 27 78 1,750 74 40 114 ' - _ _ _ After the local adjustment factors are applied to ITE trip generation, the development would generate approximately 1,750 trips during the typical weekday and 114 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Approximately 20-percent of these trips would be generated by the Senior Housing and the apartments would generate the remaining 80-percent of the trips. M:100100121100121r1.doc 0 The Transpo Group, Inc. Page 13 Valley Way Residenfial Developmenf August 29, 2000 Trip Distribution Site generated trips were initially distributed to the study area according to the travel ' patterns reflected in existing counts. They were then adjusted to account for the proximity of major retail centers and arterials in relation to the site. Local citizens were also a resource in identifyi.ng trip distribution. Detailed trip distribution and the corresponding trip assignlment are shown on Figure 5. In general, approximately 75 percent of site-generated trips are anticipated to/from the west via Broadway Avenue, Valley Way, and Sprague Avenue. Approximately 20 percent of trips are anticipated to/from the east by the same arterials. The remaining S percent of site-generated trips are anticipated to/fro '~lto Street south of ,zo~w Sprague Avenue. Based upon site plan information, all of the senior housingtnps were assigned to the east driveway and the apartment trips were assigned to the west driveway The project trip assigrunent was then added to the 2005 without-project traffic volumes to represent 2005 with-project traffc volumes. These volumes are shown on Figure 6. Operational Analysis A year 2005 with-project LOS analyses for the weekday PM peak hour was conducted for the study area Table 5 su.mmarizes the results. The year 2005 without-project conditions are shown for the purpose of comparison and identifying project-related impacts. Table 5. Future 2005 With-Project LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour Without-Project With-Project Intersection LOS' Delay2 WM3 LOS' Delay2 WM3 Broadway Avenue/Moore Street B 11.5 NBA B 12.1 NBA Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street B 12.6 NBA B 13.0 NBA Valley WaylConklin Street A 7.4 All A 8.0 NBA Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street C 25.0 NBL D 27.9 NBL West Driveway - - - A 9.1 NBA East Driveway - - - A 9.0 NBA , 1. LOS = Level of Service. 2. Delay = Average vehicle delay expressed in seconds. 3. WM = Worst Movement. (NBA = Northbound Approach, SBA = Southbound Approach, NBL = Northbound, Al! = approaches movements) , , M:100100121100121r1.doc 0 The Tianspo Group, Inc. Page 14 i - . ~ 12 A 22 1 1 ~ i~.-~- &oodway Aver1ti! JU1~ J/o , aa ~1 ~ 4 Valley woyr 2 . ~ ~ e~e ~ ~ 14 = -7 01, 'rc~€ Arrtn+re 2~6 - 4 ~ ~ .4 l, r ~ ~ULIMARY e IMPARTIJEWS ~ 120 ~5 ~ „5 ►'ir,..~ St" APTS. ~ 75 M ~ s 1OTAl UNITS 0 195 ~ > e- 4 PW' FaEA1C FOLIR I ~ TRPS Ili = 74 ' TRIPS OUT = 40 TOEAL TMP'S = 114 ~ . D+ANLY TRP5 ~ TOTAI, TRP'S = 1.750 ~ 4 F1e11Te ~ Project Trip DiisWbuttion and Total Tdp Ass%gnment - PM Peak Hour ~~Itey ~'~rvr ~esi~'e~r~~ Prop~r~v ~ } (C) C:W121Vra0*M bMWOWM 11:44 4 N 1 ' 356 - 231 320 -i - 215 21-) ~5 41-) ~9 ~ ~ 16 5 21 7 Broodway Avenue ~ 1 59 - 32 79 --O_ )~76 14~ ~46 4~ ~ 8 24 ~ 2 6 , # ~ ~ Valley Woy s t :_•:~•r~:: ~ ' Pq ~ • O •.fi:•: ~ ~ r ~ . . ~ \ I~ r ~e ~ $progue Avenue ~ ~ , 7 20 44 14 20 10 st-) 17 ~ 18~ ~5 1005 - -885 N 32 = - 19 15--) A (--35 c 35~ ~10 15 55 47 10 14 20 - x•::•::•::: :.i;::;~ • Figure 6 > 20051N~ith-Project Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour ~ A:`.::::` .`'r:.~:;:<:::r'`:`, Vall W Residential Pro , . ~ . . . eY aY P~1' (D) C:1001211graphic0l bi(Iw 082810011:44 Valley Way Residentia! Development Augusf 29, 2000 ' As shown, no site driveway or study area intersection is anticipated to operate below LOS D with the addition of site-generated trips. Operations decrease from LOS C to D at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street, but the reduction is minor with under 3.0 t seconds of increased approach delay. As stated, LOS E is minimum operations threshold for unsignalized intersections as outlined by Spokane County guidelines. Therefore all intersections are anticipated to operate acceptably in 2005. According to this analysis, approach delay at the study area intersections would increase from just under a second to just under 3-seconds with the addition of site-generated trips. The increases are minimal indicating that project has minimal impacts to the study area. , Valley Way Analysis Concern was expressed at the August Community meeting over the forecast capacity of Valley Way within the study area. According to Spokane County guidelines, Valley Way is a collector arterial that has a practical capacity of approximately 7,000 vehicles per day. Typical weekday traffic counts indicate that the arterial currently carries approximately 1,400 vehicles a day, which calculates to approximately 1,650 vehicles per day in 2005 based upon a 3 percent annual growth rate. The project is anticipated to generate 1,750 vehicles on typical ' weekday, totaling 3,400 vehicles on Valley Way under the future 2005 with-project condition. The practical capacity of Valley Way would not be exceeded in 2005 based upon tYus analysis indicating that the arterial has sufficient capacity for growth and the proposed development. , Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street Analysis A traffic signal is planned for Sprague tlvenue/Conklin Street as part of the Shelly Lake Estates condition of approval. The signal will be installed as soon as operational deficiencies are noted and when one of the signal warrants are met from the US Department of Transportation's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Site-generated trips will increase traffic at the intersection by 2.7 percent in 2005; but as stated, this is not expected to , reduce intersection operation to unacceptable levels. A signal warrants analysis was conducted to assist the County with their plarLning ' efforts. The MUTCD outlines 11 signal warrants used to gauge the need for a traffic signal. The determ.inations are based upon data such as approach geometry, traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, and accident intensity. If one of the warrants are met, then a signal is , recommended. Approach geometry and forecast 2005 with-project traffic volumes were used to test 7 of the 11 MUTCD warrants. The remaining warrants were not applicable in this situation. Winwarrants, by JUB Technologies, was the software application used to test the MUTCD warrants. Based upon the analysis, none of the MUTCD warrants were met, indicating that a signal would not be needed in 2005 with the construction of the development. Appendix D contains the Winwarrant summary worksheet and forecast traffic volumes. M:100100121100129r1.doc 0 The Transpo Group, lnc. Page 17 ' Valley Way Residentia! Development Au9ust 29, 2000 Sullivan Loop Ramp Impact F'ees ' Spokane County, WSDOT, and local developers are coordinating to construct a loop ramp from Sullivan Road to Interstate 90. The ramp is in the design stages and should be complete by 2002. The ramp will be funded by the State, County, and by local developers. The County currently maintains an impact fee of $964.76 per PM peak hour trip to account for the developer contributions towards the construction of this ramp. Approximately ~'Qj' 6 outbound trips would utilize the ramp during the typical weekday PM peak_hour; accounting fr 15=percenf o~utliourid site-gerierate~~trips. This calculates to a development impact fee et of approximately $5,800. \t\~o , e , ~ , 1 ~ , , M:100100121100121 rt . doc O The Transpo Group, lnc. Page 18 , Valley Way Residenfial Development August 29, 2000 t SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Local trip generation characteristics were assessed and it was determined that the ' Valley Way Residential Development would generate approximately 1,750 daily trips and 114 PM peak hour trips. These trips were distributed to a study area to determine the operational i.mpacts of the proposed project. Year 2005 was selected as the horizon of the analysis to ' assure reasonable operations at up to two years following the completion of the project. Operational i.mpacts were gauged at the intersections of Broadway Avenue/Moore t Street, Broadway Avenue/Conklin Street, Valley Way/Conklin Street, and Sprague Avenue/Conklin Street. Without and with-project LOS were measured and compared against Spokane County guidelines. No intersection was determined to operate below acceptable ' levels of service with the addition of site-generated traffic. Furthermore, delay increases were less than 3 seconds per intersection between the future without and with-project conditions, which indicates that m.inimal project impacts can be anticipated. ' Valley Way is a collector arterial that has a practical capacity of 7,000 vehicles per day. Approximately 3,400 vehicles will utilize the arterial in 2005 on a typical weekday after the t completion of project. This is well below the practical capacity threshold indicating that the arterial has suf[icient capacity for growth. ' As a condition of approval, Shelly Lakes Estates will construct a signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklul Street when required by Spokane County. A signal warrant analysis was conducted to assist County Planning with the timing of construction. Intersection geometry and traffic volumes were used to test 7 of the 11 warrants and it was determined that signalization would not be required in 2005 with site-generated trips. ' A loop ra.mp is planned at the Sullivan Road/I-90 interchange. Based upon County transportation improvement impact fees, the Valley Way Residential would be responsible for approximafiely $5,800 of the developer contributions. ' Based uPon the conclusions of this transportation impact analysis, the Valley Way Residential Development would have minimal transportation impacts to Spokane County and would not significantly impact the existing transportation infrastructure. Based upon this, no ' further transportation improvements are recommended for the study area. ' ' 1 M:100100121100121r1.doc 0 The Transpo Group, lnc. Page 19 ' Appendix A Definitions and Criteria 1 ~ ~ ' Level of Service Definifions and Criferia Appendix Signalized intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average total vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. Vehicle delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of average delay per vehicle during a specified time period (for example, the PM peak hour). Vehicle delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing (i.e., progression of movements through the intersection), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity. Table A-1 shows level of service criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the High- way Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209, 1997). ~ Table A-1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Delay General Description Level of Service Per Vehicle (Seconds) (Signalized Intersections) A Less than 10.0 Free Flow B 10.1 to 20.0 Stable Flow (slight delays) C 20.1 to 35.0 Stable flow (acceptable delays) ' D 35.1 to 55.0 Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay, occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) . E 55.1 to 80.0 Unstable flow (intolerable delay) F Greater than 80.0 Forced flow (jammed) Unsignalized intersection level of service criteria can be further reduced into two inter- section types: all-way stop-controlled and two-way stop-controlled. All-way, stop-controlled intersection level of service is expressed i_n terms of the average vehicle delay of all of the ' movements, much like that of a signalized intersection. 'I~vo-way, stop-controlled intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of an individual movement(s). This is because the performance of a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is more closely ~ reflected in terms of its individual movements, rather than its performance overall. For this reason, level of service for a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is defined in terms of its i,ndividual movements. With this in mind, total average vehicle delay (i.e., average delay of all i movements) for a two-way, stop-controlled intersection should be viewed with discretion. Table A-2 shows level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections (both all-way and two-way, stop- controlled). , Table A-2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ' Level of Service Average Total Delay (seclveh) A 510.0 B >10.0 and s15.0 C >15.0 and s25.0 D >25.0 and <35.0 E >35.0 and 550.0 F >50.0 C:Imydocs197Losdef.doc The TRANSPO Group, lnc. Page 1 ' , Appendix B 1 LOS Worksheets ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L T R L Y R L T A HCB: Unaiqnali:ed tnteisectlons Foleaee 3.1c Y Y N N Y N N N N THO-NAY STOP CONTROL(T479C1 ANALYSIS ChanAOllied; N Analyett The Ycenepo Group , Ccede: 0.00 InCe:eeetions Mooxe Stioet/Btoadwey Avenu• Count Pete: Ex13tSng Condltion Time Pcciod: PH Peak Lane ueeqe foc movoaenta 7,869 approech: Lene 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Intocaection ocientatlon3 East-Heet Major 9t. L T R L T R L T A Vehicla volume Datn: Y N Y N N N N N N Hovaments: 2 1 4 S 1 9 Channolited: N Gzade: 0,00 Voluoet 300 B 1 199 B J HFR: 319 9 1 211 9 3 PHPt 0.94 0.91 0.99 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lane usaqe foz inovemento 10,11a22 approach: PNVI 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N tI N li N N N N 4cdeotiian Volumo Datai Channelized: N CiadO: 0,00 Movamenta: Flovi Lane wldthc Data toi Coapuclnq Zflect ol Deley ta Nejox Stxeot Vahicleat Halk apeedi E B1oCkeget Eaalbound Waetbound 9he:ed ln volueia, mayoc th vahieles: 0 99 Modian Typec None 9hered ln volume, mejor ct vahlclesi 0 0 If ot vehiele3i 0 9at flow iata, majar th vehlclee: 1100 1700 Sac Ilow iata, najor rt vehiclos, 1700 1100 Flaced eppcaach Movementa: Numbet of major etreet through lenea: 2 2 N ot vehiclea: Northbound 0 B ot vehicleei SauChbound 0 Lenqth oP 3tudy peclod, hca: 0.25 Lene ueaq• for movemanG 1,2G3 eppcoacht Lane l Lane 2 Lane 3 Notknheet 6 Ctlticel Gap and ¢ollow-up time celculetion. L T R L T R L T A ° ~ Czltical Gap Calwlations; ti Y N N Y Y U N N Mawmont 4 7 9 Channelliedi N t c,bee• 4.1 7,5 6.9 Credei 0.00 C c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 e nv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,q 0.2 0.1 Lnne uaega !ot icovamente 4,5i6 approech: G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 c c,rI 1 etepe 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' ( II I v(vph) 9 3 t c Hovement Cepacity 952 952 1 ataqe d.l 6.8 6.9 9hared Lene Capacity 611 ^ • Pollow Op Tlm~ Calculatlona~ Hovemant 4 7 9 uozkalloat 10 deloy,guaue lenqth, end L09 ovement 1 0 9 B 9 10 11 12 t P,boae 2.2 3.5 3.3 m c f,IN 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 I------ --"°II ~ C f 2.2 3.0 7,3 I II I I I I I v(vph) 1 lY Workahaet 6 Impodance ond cepecity squaclono C a(vph) 1229 611 v/c 0.00 0.02 Step 1s RT from Nlnuc 9t. 9 12 95% quaue length Control Dalay 7.9 13.0 Confllceinp Plowe 164 ]AS A B Potenciel Capacity 852 hpproach Deley 11.0 Pedeetcien Inip*denc* Peotoc 1.00 AppKOeCh U1S B Movament Capacity 851 Probability of puouo fsae St. 1,00 Stop 41 LT tKOm Hajor SC. 4 1 WorkahuK 11 9naced Hajor LT Impodance and Oelay Conflieting Flowa 328 Fank 1 Delay Caleulatlons Potontial Capacity 1229 Hovoment 2 5 Pedeetrian Impadance Pactoc 1,00 i Novoment Capacity ~ 1229 P oj 1.00 1.00 ' P:obe6ility ot Queua 1YCe &C. 1,00 V il 0 99 tdoj. L Shazed ln. Prob. Queua [=ee 9t. 1.00 V!2 0 0 9 il 1700 1700 9 12 1700 1700 Step 41 LT drOm MSnor St. 7 10 P, Oj 1.00 1.00 D mej left 0.0 7.9 Confllctlnp Flowe 431 N number mejor at lanee 2 2 Pocentiel Capacity 557 Oalay, rnnk 1 av¢tte -1,S 0.0 PodcaLtian lrpsdance 6ectar 1.00 efaj. L, Min T Impedene• faeta= 1.00 Na}, L, Min 7Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 , Cop. Adj. factoc dua to Impedlnp mvrcnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 592 ~ Woikeheot B 3haced Lans Celeulationa Shared Lene Calculetlona Movemeni 1 B 9 10 11 lt I ---...II I L T R L T R L T R HCS: Onsignaliced Intezeectiona Feleeae 3.1c Y Y N N N N H N N TP10-pAY S?OP CONTRDL(SWSC) ANALY9I9 Cbonnsli:ed: N Analysto 1'ha Tianapo Group Gredeo 0.00 Inte=sectlani ConklSn Stseet/H[oadvay Avenue Coun[ Datoi ExletSnq Condltion Time Pariode PN Poak Lane uneqe Co[ movemsnte 7,869 epproechi Lena 1 Lane Y Lane ) Intereection Oriontationc Eaa[-WaeC Major SC. L R R L T R L T R ' ' Vehlcle Valume Datec Y H Y N N N N N N Movemontei 2 3 4 S 1 9 Channelizsd; N Gtade; 0.00 volumo: 277 6 C 189 10 1 HeR; 304 7 4 203 15 1 PHF: 0.91 0.91 0,91 0,91 0.91 0.91 Lane uaage foz mowments 10,11t12 approach: PHVt 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 9 L 7 A L T R L T R N H N N !1 N N N H Pedeattlan Volume Datei Channeli:ads N Crade: 0.00 Movementa; Flov: Lane uldth: Date foz Compueinq 8[laet of Daley to Maior Stxeet Vehiclea: Walk apeedt B Blockage; Baatbound Wes[bound ~ Shaced ln volume, mojoa [h vahlcleat 0 185 Nodian typoi Nono Shaced ln voluma, majos rt vohlelee: 0 0 k of vohicloa; 0 Set tlo:r rate, mejax th vehlc10e1 1700 1100 9at tlox rau, nnjar rc vehlcles; 1700 1700 Flacod epproach Hovementai Numbsr ot mnjor etreet throuqh lanea: 1 1 ~ M of vehlclee: Narthbound 0 W oP vohieleei Southbound 0 Gengch oL etudy poziod, hrei 0.25 Lene uaaqe fot movemente l,ic) eppzoechi Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 worknhoat 4 Critlcal Gap cnd Falloa-up tima calculation. L T R L T R L T R Criticel Gap Celculationa: N Y Y N N N N H N Movement 4 ? 9 Chennoli:edz N c c,baee 4.1 7.1 6,2 Grade; 0.00 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 C c,q 0.2 0.1 Lane usege toc movementa 0,565 appioatht G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t J,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 c c,Tt 1 staQe 0.00 0.00 0.00 I II I vlvVn) 19 1 C C Movement Capacity 515 732 1 etage 0.1 6.0 6.2 Shered Laoe Capacity 525 Follov Up Time Calculatiann; Movoment C 1 9 Wotkeheet 10 delay,qww lenqth, end LOS t t,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 Movement i a 7 B 9 10 11 12 t P,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P nv 0.02 0.02 0.02 i-°--- -----•ii ~ t P 2.2 3.5 3.3 I II I I II 1 v(vph) 0 16 wo=kehoet 6 lmQedenee and eapaeity equationa C m(vph) 1299 525 vJc 0.00 0.03 Stap 1: RT Fram Mlnor St. 9 12 958 quauo lonqth Control Delay 1.9 12.1 Canfllctlnq Flows 308 L09 A B Potontial Capacity 132 Appxoach Dalay 12.1 Pedeetcian tmpedance Fac[oi 1,00 Aypcoech 109 B Hovament Capacity 732 Probablli[y at pueua frae St. 1,00 Stop 21 6T lrom Hajor 9t. 4 1 Rorkahoot 11 Shared Majoc LT Impedanca and Deley Contllcting Flowa 311 Rank 1 Deley Calculetionn Potantlal Capacity 1299 Novement 2 S PedesCdan Impedance Pnctor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1249 P oj 1.00 1.00 PioEeblllty of Cueue tree 9t. 1.00 v il 0 185 Mej. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Pce• 9C. 1.00 V 12 0 0 5 11 ' 1700 1700 9 12 1700 1700 Stop 4: LS lsora Ninor St. 7 10 P. Oj 1.00 1100 D maj left 0.0 7.9 Conllictlnq Ploae 520 N nua3ec majar at lanea 1 1 PotentSel Capacity 511 Delay, rank 1 mvmta 0.0 0.0 Pedeo[rien iapedence Fector 1.00 Maj. L, Nln ? Impedanco factoc 1.00 Maj. L, Mln T Adj. Imp Factoz. 1.00 CaD• Adi• fectoi due to lmpadlnp mvmnt 1.00 Movemant Capacity 515 Woxkeheet B 9harsd Lane Calculetiona Bhered Lene Celculetiona Novement 7 B 9 10 11 12 , I I I I 5. x, finel valw 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.03 HCS: Uneignalizad Intorseetione Releeee 3.1c 6. Mave-up Citce, n 2.0 2•0 2.0 2.0 T, Sezvice Tino 2.0 2,1 2.0 2.1 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROLIAhSC) ANALY9I9 Workehut 5- Capaclty and Level ot 9ervice Abcksheit[ 1- Banlc Intereectfon Intormntlon 1. Anolyats Yhe Trenopo Group Nocch Bound 9outh Bound EaoL Bound Noet Bound 7. InteCeoCtlon: 4elley Woy/Conklin Avenue L1 L1 L1 L1 3. Count Dau : Exietinq Condition 1. ToCal lane Ilaw roto 37 73 SO 25 4. TiAe Peclodi PM Peek 2. 9eeviee Tlme 1,0 2.1 2.0 2.1 7. Dog:ee Utilixation, a 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03 Wockohoot 2- Volume Adjuetmente ond Slte Characteciatlca d. Depa[tULe headway, hd 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.1 5. Cepncity 877 B55 609 864 North Bound 9outh Bound Eaat Bound Heat Bound 6. Deley 7.2 7•3 7'2 7'2 L1 L1 L1 L1 1. Level Of 9ervlce A A A A 1, GT Volume: 1 7 5 5 S. Dolay Appronch 7•2 7.3 -7.2 7'2 2. TH Volume; 16 17 24 12 9, L09, epproach A A A A 3. R1' Vol¢mai 6 2 10 , 3 30. Daley, Intozaeetion 7.2 C, Peek Hour PncCOre 0.77 0.77 0.17 0.71 11. SA9, InteraacCSon A 5. Flov Rn[e LTi 9 9 & 6 6. Plov Rato THi 20 22 31 15 7. Flov Rete RTo 7 1 12 3 8. Plaa Rato Total: 37 ]J 50 25 9. Prop. Hsavy Vahteles 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 10. 9ubjact Appcoach 1 1 1 1 11. OppoaSnq Approach 1 1 l 1 12. Coniliccing Approach 1 1 1 l 13. Ceomatzy Group 1 1 1 1 14. 'f (TIme in Nouia): 0.250 Workaheet ] - Saturation Headxay Adjuetmen[ Workaheet No[th Hound 9ou[h Bound Eeet Bound Weet Bound L1 Ll L1 L1 1, Flow Rate Yo[elt 31 33 SO 25 2, Plow Rate LT: 9 9 6 6 . , 3. Flov Rata PTo 7 2 12 3 0. Pcop L7 ln lenec 0.24 0,21 0.17 0.25 5. Ptop R7 ln lonei 0.21 0.08 0.26 0.19 6. Pcop. Heavy Vehlclei 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 7. Goometry Group 1 1 1 1 8. hLT-adj Ey Teble 30-18 0,20 0.20 0.20 0.20 9. hB7-adj by Teble 10-18 -O.BO -0.60 -0.60 -0.60 10, hflV-adj Tnble 10-18 1.70 1.70 1.70 1,70 11. hedj -0.04 0.04 -0,09 -0.01 ' Workaheet 1- Dopatture Heedwey end 9arvice Tioo North Bound 9outh Bound Esat Bound Woet Bound L1 L1 Ll L1 1. Totel lane tlow rete 37 33 50 29 2. hd, lnitlel velus 3.2 3.2 3.2 . 3.2 3. x, lnltial 0.03 0,03 0.05 0.02 0. hd, Iinel velue 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.1 71 L T R L P R L 7 R HCS: Unaiqnallxed Intereectlana Releaee ).lc Y 11 H N Y N H Y Y Ti+O-WaY 9TOP CDtTfROL(TNSC) ANALYSIS Chennelized; N Analyeti The ?canspo Gcoup Gzade: 0,00 Inteseection: Spregue AvanuelConklin B[zaet Count Datai 6xiatnq Condition Time Pe=iod; PM Peak Lane wage foc movsnente 7,869 eppcoacha Lane 1 Lane 1 Lane ] Intezeection Ozienta[1on: Eeet-S7eat Nnjat St. 1 T R L S R L ? R ° ° Vehicle Volume Datat Y N U N Y Y N H N Ncvemente: 1 2 3 4 S 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 Chennallteda N Gradei 0.00 Voluiae: 21 866 10 29 765 7 10 6 97 7 a 24 HPNi 23 941 11 72 $32 8 11 7 Sl 8 4 26 PHF. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.42 0,92 0.92 0.92 Lane uange tor movemenw 10,11s12 approach: PXV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L 7 R L T R L S R Y Y Y N N N N N N Pedeatclan Volume Data; Channeld:ed: N Gcade; 0.00 Hovementec Flow; Lane wldthi Qata :oc Canputinq Bftect of Deloy to Mejot 9treet Vehlclesi Welk 3paed; B Blockeqe; Eaetbound Weatbound Shnced ln volumo, oajox th vehiclea: 0 0 Medlan Tyye: TWL'fL She:ed ln volume, aajoz rt vehieles: 0 0 9 of vehlelea: 5 SaC tlow zate, major th vehlclee; 1700 1700 Sat floH :ate, mejoc rt vehlcles; 1100 1100 Flnied eppeaech llovementai Numbec of inejoz atreeC through lanes+ 2 Z y ot vohlcleet No:thDound 0 B of whicleec Southbound 0 6engGh o1 atudy period, hrsi 0.29 ° • Lane uaope for movomenta 1,293 epproeeh: Lan* 1 Lane 2 Lano 7 Workeheet 4 Crit(ca) Gep end Follaw-up time calculation. L T R L T R L T A CtStlcol Gep Caleuletlons; Y !1 N H Y N N Y Y Movamant 1 4 T A 9 30 11 12 • Channelited: N t c,baee 4.1 4.1 7.5 6,5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Giedo: 0,00 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 c C,Q 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 Lane ueege foc movemon[e 4,5C6 eppcoachi C 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,?c Padeetiien Impodenco eaccor 1,00 1,00 1sCege 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 Cep. Adj, CactoK due to Tmyeding avmnt 0.96 0.97 2 atage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Movomeac Capacity 339 311 t c 1 ataqu 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2 atage 4.1 4.1 6.5 5.5 6.9 6.6 ,5.5 6.9 Paxc Singie 9taqe Yollow Up Time Caltulatlonev Con[licting Piown 1895 1896 t9ovomont 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 PoCential Capacity 69 69 Pede*trlen Impadanc• Factor 1.00 1.00 t t,baae 2.2 2.2 3.5 0.0 3.3 3,5 4,0 3.3 Cap. Adi. teetox due to Smpedinq mvmnt 0.93 0.93 t f,HV 1.0 1,0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 Mowmont Capacity 67 64 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t t 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.7 7.5 0,0 3,7 Rosult Coc 2 itaqa pC00e791 hbckahaot 6 Impodance and capacity oquatione a 0.98 0.98 y 0.99 1.28 Stop 1: tYf [com NSnoc St. 9 12 C t 266 257 Probabiltry ot Queua fcea &t. 0.98 0.98 CanClletlnq Floaa 076 420 Patential Capacity 575 582 Fodoetrlen Imyodance Pector 1.00 1.00 Hovament Capacity 533 582 Wo:keheet 7b - Caaputetlan of the aELtet of Two-etage qep ecuptance Pzobebllity ot Queuo fcae Sc. 0.90 0.96 Steg 4: LT trarn Mlnor 9C. 7 10 Part 1- Fiiat Stago 5tep 2& LT tzom Major 9[, 0 1 Con21lctlnQ Flovo 992 896 Conflictinp Flowm 952 839 Pountial Capacity 263 300 Po[anClel Capaclty 717 791 Pedeatclan Inpadanco Fectoc 1.00 1,00 Pedentzien Impedence Fectoz 1.00 1.00 Cep, Adj. facto[ due to Impedlnq mvmnt 0.97 0.96 Movomrnt Capacity 717 791 Hovement Capacity 256 287 ?:obabllley o! Quuw froo SC. 0.96 0,97 Part 2- Second Stege taorkehost 1a - Computetlon o[ tAo oCfect o( Tvo-atape qop acceptonce Contlictinq Flawa 481 520 Potentiel Capacity 535 SOB Step 31 TH fcom NSnoc 9t. B Il Pedaetzlen Impedenco EocGOZ 1.00 1.00 Pact 1- fixat Stege Cap. Adj. feetor due to Imyeding mvmnt 0.90 0.06 Moveraont Capacity 402 437 ConPlictinq Plowa 992 898 Potantinl Capacity 322 756 Pedentrlen Impedance Fector 1.00 1.00 Pert 3• Single 9Caqe Cep. Adj. [actox due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.96 Movement Capacity 312 340 Conflicting Flowe 1473 1418 ➢robabtlity ot Quouo Ccou SC. 0.98 0.99 PoUntSal Cap&city A8 97 Podeetzian Impadance Factoc 1.00 1.00 Mnj. L, Min T Impedance tector 0,91 0.91 Pert 2- Sewnd Stege Mej. L, Nin T Adj. Iiap Pecto:. 0,93 0.93 . Cep, Adj. faetoc due to Impeding mwont 0.89 0.84 Conflicting Flows 902 998 Novement Capacity 79 81 Potentiel Capacity 355 320 Feault toz 2 etage pzoceaa: • a 0,9& 0.98 y 0.17 0.60 C t 249 2'79 ° Workahwt 8 9hated Lene Calculatrone Shacad Lone Calculatlona Novement 7 B 9 30 31 12 ° ^ ° I-'---- II-------------------1 I °--°-°----II 1 I II 1 ' vlvph) 11 l 51 8 0 26 MovemenE Cepaclty 249 260 935 214 291 582 9Aezed Lene Cepeeity 481 495 wazkeheat 10 delay,Queue lenp[h, and Lo5 Mawmont 1 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ I I I I --°----°°-II I I II I v(vph) 23 32 11 BB 38 C m(vph) 791 717 209 101 425 v/a 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.09 95% queue lenq[h Control Deley 8.7 10.2 20.1 13.5 14.3 !AS A 8 C B 8 Appcoech Delay 14.6 14.3 Approach lp9 B 8 L 'f R L T R L T R . HC9t Onaigneliied Intueectlona Releeae ).lc Y Y N d Y N N N N 7N0-WaY STOP COH4RDL(SWSC) ANALY9I9 Channelized; N Melynt: The Yranapo Gtoup Gradet 0.00 Intersectlan: Hooce StLect/Broadi+ay Avanue Count Dete: Futuce Ptichout-Project 71me Peciod: PM Peak Lane unage for movoments 7,869 epp[oacho Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 7 Intaiaectlon Ocientationi Cae[-Wost Najor St. L 1 R L Y R L T R VeAlcle volume Oeteo Y N Y H N N N N N Movamentes 2 3 - 4 5 7 9 Channeli:edt PI G[ede: 0, 00 Volumet 395 10 5 225 10 5 HFRi 367 11 5 239 11 5 ' PHF: 0.99 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,99 0.90 Lane uaage for mavemanta 10,11612 appcoech; PHVi 0.02 0.04 0,02 0.02 0,02 0,02 Lane l Lane 2 Lane 7 L T R L T R L T R li 8 N N N N N li N Pedeatrien Volume Datas Chennellzed: N Grada: 0.00 Movementer Flow: Lane rridth: Data for Computing Effact of Uelay W Mejor SCraet Vahiclaei Relk apeed; B Blockagei Eastbound Westbound Shezod ln volumo, major th vohiclea; 0 112 Hadian 7ypo: None Shazed ln volume, me]ot [L vehiclent 0 0 ~ p of vehlclee. 0 Sat llow iato, majot th vahiclaa: 1700 1100 9et flow rota, mejaz ct vahiclea: 1700 1700 Flased appzoach Novamanta: Humber ot mejoc atcoet throuqh lanaei 2 2 Y of vehlclsa: Nocthbound 0 p of vehiclea: Southbound 0 lenqth of etudy pexlod, hrs: 0,25 ° Lana usaqe Eor iwvamente 1,2c3 epptoachz Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Wockahast 4 Critlcal Gap and Follou-up tlma celwletion, L T P L T R L T R Criticel Gap Celculetione; N Y N U Y Y N PI U Movea,ent 4 7 9 Channalitad; tt ~ t c,ben• 4.1 7.5 6.9 Czedet 0.00 t c,hv 2.0 2.0• 2.0 e nv 0.02 o.oa 0.02 c o,q 0.2 0.1 Lane ueaqe [or movementa 4,5&6 approach: G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t3,lt 0.0 0.1 0.0 c c,r~ I II I 1 etepe 0,00 0.00 0100 I II I v(vph) 11 S t c Movament Cepacity 496 021 !steg• 1.1 6.6 6.9 Shuod Lane Capaity 572 Follou Up Timo Calculetlones . Movement 4 7 9 Worknheet 10 deley,queua 1engtA, and L09 t t,beee 2.2 9.5 3.3 Movement l 4 7 B 9 10 11 12 t P,NV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 I--"" ""'-II I t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 I II I I I I v(vph) 5 26 Worknheet 6 Impedance and capeoity eQuetlona C m(WA) 1177 512 v/c 0.00 0.03 9tap 1; PT fcom Minoc SC. 9 12 951 queue length Control Deley 8.1 11.5 ConL ic[inq Ploaa 109 LOS A B Potentlal Capacity 821 Approech Delay 11.5 PedeeUien Impadenee FaeCOt 1.00 Approaeh L07 8 Movomont Capeclty 821 Probabillty ot ¢uaue trea 9C. 0.99 step 21 LT froa Majoe 9t. E 1 wbckaheot 11 Sharad Hajaz LT Impedanca and Dalay ~ Cantlictlny Flown 378 Rank 1 Delay Caleuletiono Potontial Capocity 1177 Movement 2 5 Pedoetrian Impodanu Factor 1.00 Novement Capacity 1177 P oi 1.00 1.00 P[obnblllty ot aueue txe• St. 1.00 V 11 0 212 Haj. L Sheted ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 2,00 V 12 0 0 9 11 1700 1700 9 12 1700 1700 etep 41 LT fcom Mfnoi 9t. 1 30 P" Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj latt 0,0 8.1 Conflicting Plowa 507 H nunbei mejoz et lenea 2 2 Potential Capacity 498 Delay, rank 1 mvmte -1.$ 0.0 PeOes[zlen Impedance Pactor 2.00 Hej. L, Nin Y Impedence factar 1.00 May. L, HSn 2 Adj. ]mp Factor. 1.00 Cep. Adj. Lettoc dua to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 096 Wozkeheet 8 9Aertd Lens Celculetione 9Aarnd 4ene Celeuletiona , Movement 7 B 9 10 ll 12 I--'°- II I ~ L T R L S R L 7 R HCS: Oneignalized Inucsoetions Aoleaeo J.lc Y Y N N N N N N N 1'WO-NAY STOP CONTR9L(TNSC) ]1NALYSIS Chennelitedt N Enelyati ?he Tcenepo Group Crade: 0,00 tntereeetion: Conklio Street/Braadaay Avenue ~ Count Detei Putuxe Nlthout-ProiwC Tima Pe:lad, PM Peak 4ane ueaqe for movemente 7,849 appioechi Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Intecaection Otiantation; Eaet-Nest Hajoc St. L 4 R L Y R L T R Vohicle Volwna Oata: Y N Y N N N N N N Movementa: 2 ] 4 S 7 9 Chennallxedt N Gtado: 0.00 volume: 320 30 5 215 15 5 HPR: 352 33 5 236 16 5 PHF: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lane ueege Coz movemente 10,11912 appcoaeh: PM1; 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T A L T R N N N N tl H N N N Podeot[Son Volumo Datai Channellxed: N Ccade: 0.00 Movementa; Flowt • Lane t+ldth: Data Pox Computing 6ffect of Delay to Nejor 3tceai Vehleleat Balk epeods i Blockaqe: Eaetbound Vieatbound Shatad ln voluma, mejoc tA vehlclea: 0 215 Madian Type: None Sharod ln volume, mejor rt vehiclea: 0 0 R of vehicleai 0 5et flow cete, mejor th vehlcleei 1700 1700 Set Plow cate, major tt vehiclea; 1700 1100 Flaced appraach Novemante: Numbot o1 maioc aczeot Chrouqh lenen: 1 1 9 ot vehiclee: Nocth6aund 0 R oi vehicleer 3outhbound 0 Lenqth o( etudy pariod, hre; 0.25 Lnne uaag• foz movementa 1,20 appraathi Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 NorkaheeC 4 Critlcal Gep end Follow-up time eeleuletion. L T R L 7' R L Y R C:itical Gap Celculationr ll Y Y H N N N N N Movement a ? 9 Chenneli[adi N t c,baoa 4.1 7.1 6.2 Gredes 0.00 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1,0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,p 0.2 0.1 Lane ueeg• !or wovtmenta 1,5t6 appzoacht G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,It 0.0 0.7 0.0 c o,r~ 1 atag• 0.00 0,00 0.00 I II I v{vphE 16 5 t c Movemsnt Capacity 457 617 1 atage 4.1 6.4 6.2 9heced Lens Capacity 494 Collox Up Slmm Calculatione: Movement 4 7 9 pockehoot 10 dolay,quovo ]eng[h, and L09 [ l,beae 2.2 ).S 3.3 Movamont 1 0 7 B 9 10 11 12 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 I---^' '°'°I I I t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 I II I I II 1 v(vph) 5 22 Wockeheat 6 Imyedartca and cepacity aQuacions C mlvphl 1110 194 v/c 0.00 0.04 Step 1t AT f[em Mtnor SC. 9 12 95% Queue l.ngth Contiol Delay 8.1 12,6 ConClScting Floua 968 L09 A 8 Potencial Capacity 677 ADDCOach Doley 12.6 Pedestclan Iopadance focto[ 1,00 ADpcowh LOS B lbvement Capacity 677 Probabillty o[ Quew ttee St. 0,99 Step 21 LT from Haior 9t. 0 1 Wockshe.C 11 Shered Mejoc LT Impsdence end Deley Contlictinq flows 785 Rank 1 Deley Celculatlona Potential Capacity 1174 Movemeq[ 2 5 Podoatxian ImDodaaca Factoc 1.00 eovement Capacity 1170 P oj 1.00 1,00 Piobability ot puaue Lrea 9t. 1.00 v it 0 215 Maj. L 9hered ln. Pzob. Queue Pcne St. 0.99 V 12 0 0 9 il 1700 1700 5 11 1700 1700 9tep 0; L? fraw Mlnor 9t. 7 10 P' Oj 1.00 0.99 D mei left 0.0 8.1 Conllictlnq Flowe 615 N numbet rajoc et lenea 7 1 Potentlal Capacity 459 Dolay, xank 1 mvmta 0.0 0,0 Pedeatrfan Impedence Pactoi 1.00 Maj. L, Hin T Impmdance Lector 0.99 ~ Maj. L, Nin Y Adj. Imp Pactor. 1.00 Cep. Jidj. factoz dus to lmpodtng mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 453 Ab=kaheet 8 5hezed Lene Calculationa 9harod lane Calculetiono Hovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 - ° - I'°°- II I 3. x, tinal aalue 0.05 0.98 Q.aS HCSI UnaiphaLltdd 7nSaYZflctLooa AotMsaa H.Ic fi. Move-up Lime, m 7•0 2•0 4i 1 0 P'p 7. 9azvice Timn 3•1 2•2 Z•a 2'2 RI,L-WAY 9TaP GONTP,QLtAW$C} ,RH7yY9I5 Worksheet 5- CapAtizy Olid Lavel of 9ervica WosYeheet 1 = 8ob1C InCeYaeCtfvn Infdrma[1on 1, Analynt: The 7raoepo 6roup Noith Bound 54uth Bvuad Eaet flouod weet aound 2. InteraecCioni Valley IfayJCookliy R4eriV9 L1 L1 1,1 IIb 3. Cvunt Dete~ ~1, Tntal lanm Clo+ xace 51 49 71 39 C, sine 2axiadi pM Peak , 2. Service Tino 2,1 2.2 2.0 2.2 ReqYeo Ut71$xetionr x 0.06 0.05 6.09 Q.ag workahret 2- Volume AdjueEmenka and 9ita ChoCettaElakit,f 4. Dapaseure headuay, hd q.l 9,2 4.0 4•8 5. Capacity ASS 839 870, 942 North Bound SolkCh Hfl9Rd Cp9t 9dllnd Waet Bound 6. 6elay 7.4 7.4 1.4 1•4 Zl L! L1 LI 1. Lov61 0f seraice A A A A ' l. LP Valuma: 10 SO 10 l9 6. 6eley hpProaCh 7.4 7.4 `!.4 7.4 2. TH Yolura6: 29 29 30 19 9. G05, appxoach A A a ~ 3. E7 4p1umo: 19 5 15 5 19. E~e1ey, 3nteraection 7.d 4. Penk Haur Pac6osr 0.77 0,17 9.~7 1) ,?7 11. L09, InteYSaciiarl A 9. F1oN RaCd tT: 12 12 12 la fi. E1tlN R6l9 TN7 29 2$ u 19 7. Pkbw Rste R'Ln la fi SB 6 8- Fkom Bdla teteli 57 45 71 39 9. Psny- I[Cavy Vehtcle: 4.02 4,42 0.02 0.9¢ 10. 9ubject AppeoaClS ] 3 1 7 11 Oppao-ing Appranch 1 L 1 1 I lZ• conCllctlnP Approach 1 l i 1 13 Ge4m4itY Croap 1 I 1 1 19. T(PimO Ln fl4ues]i 0.254 4POYkahsoC 8- SaC51rlStL9n H9CdwaY Adjuekmant WoiNohaat tFo;th Bound Soueh &ound 2471t 64upd Weat Bound , LS LE L1 L1 i, elou ~te Potel~ 51 a5 11 aB 2. Flau Rete LP: 12 12 12 7$ 3, elou Pnta nrF 12 6 19 6 ' A. Pcop LT fo lanei 0a25 0,29 0119 0.33 5, tevg PT E- d+n,~ 0.25 0.14 0_27 9.17 6. Peop, Haevy veAielej 0.0E D.fl2 4.9Z fl.62 1. GB6m0tIy GLOUp i 1 1 '1 e. nLr-adj by ssbd. ta-la 0~20 0.20 o.za 0_21) 9~ hRT°adj $y Tab]a 10•19 -0.69 -0.60 -0.50 •0.40 - 10. hHV-adj 7ahle SO-IR 1,10 1.14 1,70 1,70 ' 11= hadj -o ,8-7 9.a1 p.UO Wo.rkCh44L 9- VEg>zture Hesdxay and Saxvlca Tlme "crkh eaund 84Vth BOUnd Esat Bound WeoC Aollhd LI 1.1 L6 L1 1. 7atai Iaue Claw zatn Sl 45 71 ae , 3.2 2, hd, tnitidl valua 3.2 7.2 3.2 3. K, inltial 0.95 G.dd 4.06 4,U3 4. Rtl, tYnel value 4.1 6,2 4.0 4.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~■ir ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ L T R L T R L T R HL9i Onafqnaliud Intezeeetlone lieleaao 3.1c Y 11 N N Y N N Y Y TWO-WAY S70P CON7AOLITWSCI AMALYSIS Channalieod; p Analyeti the Tranapo Graup Gcede: 0.00 SntoroactSoni Spragu• Avanua/Contlin 9treet Count Datet Putura WiChout-PCOi*ct 71mo Feciod; PM 9eek Lane usags Poz sove¢ente 7,869 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lano 3 Intarooction OtlonteClon: Eaat-WOat Maioz St. L T F l T R L T R Vehlclo Volurae DaCa: Y N N N Y Y N N N kcvemente& 1 2 ] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Chenneliied: N Gcnde; 0.00 Voluma: 25 1005 15 JS BBS 10 15 10 55 10 S 30 HFRi 77 1092 16 38 962 11 16 11 60 il 5 33 PHF; 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane uoaga foz movemontn 10,11cI2 appcoachi PHV: 0,02 0,02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane ! Lano 2 Lane 7 L T fl L T R L i R • ^ Y Y Y N N N N N [1 Pedaatclan Volume DaCai Channolixed; ~ R Cradoi 0.00 Mowmente : Flowi Lane vldth, Dpte Poc Computing ELfoct ot Delay to Mejoc 9txeet Vehfcleas Walk epeede i Block&9*1 . ¢e3CDound Neatbound Shered ln volume, majoz ch vehiclea: 0 0 Medlan 7ypoi TWLTL 5hered ln volumo, mejoz ce vohiclaes 0 0 il af vehlcleat S ' SaC flow rate, ma]ot th vehicles: 1100 1700 ' 8et llow rete, mejor rt vehicles: 1100 liDO Flared eppcoach MovemenCa: Nu.mber ol major sCCeet thcouqh lanoet 1 Z 8 al vehlclea: Northbound 0 d oC vehlclant 9outhbound 0 Length oP atudy peclod, hcn; 0.25 Lane ueepe fa: movomonta 1,20 appcoech; Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Mockaheet 4 Cri[lcel Gep end Polloa-up t[me caleuletion. L T R L T R L T R Criticel Gap Celtuletian3t Y N 11 N Y N G Y Y Movement 1 4 7 8 9 30 11 12 Chennellced: N t c,baae 4.1 4.1 7,5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Gcadao 0,00 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~ E hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 9.02 0.0E 0,02 t e,g 0,2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 Lane ueepe for movementa 1,5s6 epproecAi G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0100 0,00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 t C, YI , POCOOCCiAfl Impedance Pactoz 1.00 1.00 1 etaqe 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cep, Adj. tactoc dw to Impeding mwnt 0.90 0.96 2 atape 0,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Movement Capecity 284 257 t c ' 1 aCaga 4.1 4,1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6,9 2 atape 4.1 4.1 6.5 5.5 6.9 6.5 5.5 6.9 Part 3- Single Steqe ° ° Pollor Op TSme Celculntionet Confllcting Flows 2204 2201 Mnvement 1 a 7 8 9 10 11 12 Potencinl Capacity 61 44 Podeatrien Impadanco Facton 1.00 1.00 t f,baee 2.2 2.2 3.9 0.0 3.3 3.5 0,0 3.3 Cep, Adj. fectoc dw to Impedinq mvmnt 0.90 0,90 [ t,NV 1.0 1.0 1,0 1,0 1.0 1,0 1,0 1.0 Movement Capacity 40 GO P hv 0,02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 t f 2,2 2.2 3.5 4,0 3.3 3.5 0.0 3,7 Reeult tat 2 atago proceen: 47orkeheet 6 Impedance end ceyacity equetlona e 0.98 0,98 y 1.01 1.37 etep 1: R? Yrom Minor 8t. 9 12 C t 218 203 Pcababillty ot Queue fceo St. 0,95 0.97 Contlicting Ploaa 554 486 PotenClal Capacity 076 927 Padeetclan Impedano• Factox 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 476 527 ~ Wocksheot 7b - Computation oP tha affect of ?wo-atage gap acceptance Pcobability of Quauo [cee St. 0.87 0.91 Step G; LT !rom Minor 9t. 1 30 Parc 1- Fixst S[aqa Stap 21 LT lxoao Hajoz St. 4 1 Confllcting Flows 1155 1043 ConClle[ing Flowa 1109 973 Poceneiel Capacity 209 245 Potentlei Capacity 626 704 Pedeet[1an Impedence Factot 1.00 1.00 Pedeetclan Impedence Faetoc 1.00 1.00 CaD• Adj• tactoc du• Co Impediny mvrnnt 0.96 0.94 Movement Capacity 626 704 NoVOmant Capacity 201 230 PsoDabSlity of Quoue t=et 6C. 0.94 0.96 Pazt 2- 9econd Staqe ° ° Workaheet 7a - CovyuCetion of the efEec[ oP Two-eteqe qap aeceptance Conflictinp F1ovs 560 606 Potenttal Capacity 460 451 9tep 3: iH tcam Hinor 9t. B 11 Pedoatzien Impedartce Feetor 1.00 1.00 Part 1- Plrat 9[age Cep. Adj. [ector duo to ImBedinq mvmnt 0.86 0.81 Movemen[ Capacity 415 363 Conflicttnq Plows 1155 1043 Potantial Capacity 270 304 Pedeattian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Part 3- 9ingla Staqe Cap. Adj. tactot due to Impeding mvmnc 0,96 0.99 HovamenC Capacity 259 286 Conflicting Flous 1715 1649 ProbaDll![y ot Oueue free 9C. 0.96 0.98 Potontlel Capacity SA 65 Pedeatzien Impedenee Factoi 1.00 1.00 Mej, L. Nin S Impedence fector 0.09 0.86 Part 2- 9ocond Staqo Maj. L, Hin T Adj. Inp Pactoi. 0.91 0.69 Cap. Adj. tacCOr due to Impedinq mvmnt 0.85 0.76 Canfllctinq Flows 1049 1163 19avement Capacity 49 51 Potentlel Capacity 303 267 Reault foc 2 atepe proceaa: a 0.98 0.98 y 0.45 0.65 C c 196 218 Vtocknh*et B 9hexad Lene Calculationa Shaced Lane Gelculetiona MovemonC 7 8 9 10 11 12 . I------ II-------------------I I -------------II I I II I v(vpA) 16 11 60 11 9 33 Novament Cepocity 196 218 476 218 203 527 9hered Lane Capacity 402 393 Piaxkaheet 10 deley,quwe lonqth, end L09 Movament 1 4 7 B 9 10 11 12 I'°--- II-------"-'...""'I I ----°-------II I I II I v(vph) 27 38 16 71 49 C m(vph) 701 626 196 102 353 v/o 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.11 956 queue length Control Delay 10.3 11.1 25.0 15.0 16.8 L49 B B C C C Appconch Deley 11.6 16.8 7lpproach L09 C C ~ ! L T R L T R L T R NCB: Oneignalized Intereectlone Relaee 3.1c Y Y N N Y N N N N TWO-WAY STOP COtPfitOL(TFSC) Allld,YSIB Channeli:edi N Analyet: 7he Rronepo Gcoup Grnde: 0.00 InCa[eectlon; tlooce Stceet/8roaduay Avenue Count Datez t'utuze Wi[h-Pxoject Timsis Peciodi PM Pank Lane useg• foc movementa 7,B[9 approaths Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 IntezeecCSon Orlen[ation; 6nsi-iteet MajOr 9t, L T 8 L 7 R L T R Yahiele Voluma Datat Y N Y N N N N N N Movements: 2 3 6 S 1 9 Channellzed, N Gzades 0.00 volums: 356 21 5 231 16 S HFR: 379 21 5 246 il 5 PHPt 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lane unage for movamen[e 10,11i12 apyzoach: PNV: 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 7 L T R L T R L Y R N N N H N N N N N Pedeetrian Valume Patat Channell:ed; N Giede: 0.00 Movemente: Flou: ~ Lane width: Dnta for Computing Effect of Delay to Hajor Stroet Vehtcle3r Walk spoodc B Blockaqe: Eastbound Noatbaund Shered ln volumo, majoc th vohielo9: 0 115 • Median Type; Nona Shared ln volume, me5oc rt vehiclea: 0 0 q of vehiclea: 0 Set flow cate, mojoz Ch vehicloei 1700 1700 9at Ilou re[e, majoc rt vehlclea: 1700 1700 Fla[ed approach HovemonW E Number of majoi atreat thiough lanes: 2 2 N af vehlclea; Horthtround 0 N a1 vehlcleat Southbound 0 Lenyth ot atudy peclod, hxei 0.25 Lane uaage far movementa 1,20 eppconch: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Wackehaot d Crltical Cap artd Folloa-up tlme celculation. L T li G T R L T ii Criticel Gap Celculationef N Y U N Y Y N N N Movemen[ a 7 9 Channellxed: N t c,baee 9.1 7,5 6,9 Gcadet 0.00 C c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 C coq 0.2 0.1 Lana ueeqa for movementa 9,966 appaoach: G 0.00 0,00 0.00 , Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane l C 7,1t 0.0 0.7 0,0 ~ t o,Tc I II I 1 ataqe 0.00 0.00 0.00 I II I v(vph) 17 4 t c Movament Cepad ty 482 807 1 etege 4.1 6.8 6.9 She[ed Lane Capacity 533 ° Follow Up Time Calculatlaner tdovomonc 4 7 9 woekeheee 10 dalay,quwa Ianpth, and L09 ^ ° C t,beae 2.2 3.5 7.9 Novement 1 a 7 B 9 10 11 12 t f'HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.07 0.02 0.04 I-""- ""-'II i t! 2.2 3.5 3.7 I II I ~ I I I v(vph) 5 22 iaozkohwt 6 Impodonce end cepeolEy oquatlona C m(Vph) 1154 533 v/c 0.00 0.04 Step 1t R2 fcom Minoc St. 9 12 95% quaue lenqth Contzol Delay 8.1 12.1 Confllctinq Plowa 201 LOS A B Pountial Capacity 807 Approech Doley 12.1 Podeettlan Impedanc• Fqctoc 1.00 APProaeh !A5 B Hovemant Capacity 807 Pzobability oi Queue tzae St. • 0.99 , Stop 21 LT tzom Major 3t. 9 1 Horkeheet 11 9haLed Mojot LT IuWedana and Deley ' Confllotinq Flows 401 Rank 1 Geley Calculetione ' Potential Capacity 1154 Movoment 2 5 ~ Pedsstrian Impadenca Factox 1.00 Movement Capacity 1154 P oj 1.00 1,00 Pcobebiltty ot Queue frea St. 1.00 V 11 0 115 Hny, L 9hared ln. Prob. Queue Fioa St. 1.00 V 12 0 0 S 11 1700 1100 ~ g jZ 1700 1700 8up di LT from Mlnoc 8t. 7 10 P. Oj 1.00 1.00 D mei le[t 0.0 8.1 Conflieting Plovs 523 N number major at lenoa 2 2 Potentiel Capacity 483 Delay, cenk 1 mvmti -I.S 0.0 Padeetxlen Impedanw Pactox 1.00 Naj, L, Nin T Impedanca factoc 1.00 • Haj, L, Hln 1 Adi. Imp Fector. 1.00 Cnp. Adj. factac due to Impedinq mvmnt 1.00 Movament Capacity 482 workahea[ 8 Shacad Lanr Calcula[Sona Sha:ed Lene CalculaClona Movement 7 B 9 10 11 12 I I I .I ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~■r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r■r ~ ~ ~ i L r R L r a c r a HCSi Unaiqnalieed lntoceectlone Roleaae ],lc Y Y N N N tl N N N iN0-WAY 9TOP C9NYROLII'wSC) ANALYSI9 Channe]lzedi N Analyetc The Trenepo Gcoup Gcede: 0.00 lnteraectioni Conklln Strcet/Broadaay Avanuo Coun[ Datet FUCuta Oiith-Pcoieet Time Peciodi ?H Paek L8110 uaaqe foz moveQente 7,ec9 epptoach: Lane I Lane 2 Lane 3 Interaection Odontetioni Eaat-tieat Major St. G T R L T R L T R Vehlclo Volume Oatai Y N Y N N N H N N Howmante. Z 3 4 5 i 9 Channoli=ad: N Gradei 0.00 volwa•t 320 41 9 215 21 1 HFR: 352 45 10 276 23 8 PHP: 0,91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lane ueaye for movementa 10,21c12 appioach: PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane ] L 7 R L T R L T R N H N N N N N N N Pedeetzien 4olume Data: Channeli:ed; N Gcado: 0,00 Hovemantei Flowi Lane uidths Deta (oz Computinq ECLeet oP Mley to Haioz 6[reet Vohlclea% walk npaedi i Blookaqai Baetbound weatbound Shozed ln volwre, major th vohielee: 0 215 Median 7ype: None Shozod ln volume, mejor :t vaAiclee: 0 0 N of vohiclea, 0 Sat tlov xata, maior th vohlclesi 1700 1700 Sat Flow cate, ma)or xt vehleleei 1700 1700 Flsrod approeth Moveoente: Itumber of raejos atiaet theouqh lanaas 1 1 i of vehicle3i Narthbound 0 ~ Y of vehlcleet Southbound 0 Lenqth of atudy paxlad, hta: 0.25 Lane uaaq• Foc movementa 1,267 appcoachi Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 wockehaet 4 CTltlcal Gep and Follou-up timm calculntion. L T A L Y R L T R Critical Gap Caleulationei N Y Y N N U N N q Novsment 0 ? 9 ChannsliLedi 17 t c,boa• 4.1 7,1 6.2 Gtadei 0.00 t c,hV 1.0 1,0 1.0 P hv 0,02 0.02 0.02 , t c,g 0.2 0.1 Lane asaqe faa movement9 9,5i6 appraech: G 0,00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ri ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ w w ~ ~ ~ s ~ r■r c c,r: 1 ataqe 0.00 0.00 0.00 I II I vI vph) 23 B t t Movement Capacity 442 672 1 etaqe 4.1 6.4 6,2 Shazed Lerte Capacity 989 Follow Op Tlme Celeula[ione; !£ovement 0 'I 9 Nockeheet 10 deley,queue lenqth, and LOS t f,baa• 2.2 3.5 3.3 Movamant 1 1 1 8 9 10 11 12 t f'HV 0.9 0,9 0.9 P hv 0.02 0.02 0,02 I------ ----•'II I [ P 1.2 3.5 3.3 I II I I II I vtwnt io 31 Wockahmet 6 Impedance and ceyacity equatlona C m(vpA) 1162 489 v/c 0.01 0,06 Srip L RT from Mlnor St. 9 12 956 quoue length Contsol Delay 8.1 13.0 Conlllcting Flowo 374 LOS R B Potentlal CeDeCtty 672 Appcoech Deley 13,0 Podoacrian lmpedence Faccoi 1,00 Appcooch w9 B Movement Cepeclty 672 Probebility af Queue Fzse Se. 0,99 Stop 2: LT fccm Major St. 4 1 Workehaet 11 Shaced Major LT Impedenco and Deley Confllctlnp Plowa 397 Nank 1 Delay Calculatione Potentlel Capacity 1162 NovemonC 2 5 Pedeatclan impadance Pettor 1.00 Movement Cepeclty ' 1162 P oj 1.00 0.99 Probebillty ot Quwe fcaa St. 0.99 V!1 0 215 Nej. L Shared ln. Pcob, Queue Free 9t. 0.99 v 12 0 0 9 il 1700 1700 9 12 1700 1700 Step it LY fzam Mlnoi 9[, 7 10 P' Oj 1.00 0.99 D maj laft 0.0 8.1 Conflietinq Flawe 630 N number major et lenea 1 1 Potantial Capacity 445 Dolay, cank 1 mvmtn 0.0 0.1 Pedaetcian Impadence Factox 1.00 Nej, L, Mtn T Impedance tactoi 0.99 Mnj, L. Nln T Adj. Inp Factoc. 0.99 Cap. Adj. Peetoc due to Itopedinq mvnnt 0.99 Flovement Capacity 442 • Workaheet B Shacsd Lane Celculetiana ~ Sharad Lene Celalationa Movement 7 A 9 10 11 12 I I I I , r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ wr r■~ ~ ~ ~ r r~ ~ ~w 5. K, Elnal valus 0.12 0.08 0.19 0.05 HC9: Unsignelixed Inte:aectione Rolaaee 3.1e 6. Move-up ti;ne, m 2.4 2•0 2•0 2'0 1. 9ervice Tlme Z•a Z•Z 2•1 2'4 ALl-WAY STOP COITfR01(At95C) ANALYSIS Worksheet 5- Cepeeity end Leval al Secvico woskahe*e 1- Baeie Intereaetion Intoxmation 1 1, anelyet; 4he Trenapo Graup ~ Mocth Bound South Bound Bast Bound Weac Bound 2. Intotaationi Va11oy,Way/Conklin Avenue l L1 L1 L1 L1 Count Date; ~n ~yd p 1. Totel lene Ilow :ata 100 64 110 04 0. Timo Parlodi 7H Pe4k 2. 5ervlcu Tiee 2.4 2,2 2•1 Z'd 3. Degcee Otlllzation, x 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.05 Workeheot 2- Volume Adjwtrmnte end site CharacGCletice 4. Depax[uro headuay, hd 4.4 9.2 4.1 0.4 5, Copaelty 799 834 Bi] 794 North Bound SouCA Bound Eaet Bound Feet Bound 6. Delay 8.0 7•5 1.7 7.6 Ll L1 L1 Ll 7. Level Ot Service A A A A 1. LT volume: 07 10 ]0 10 B. Deloy Apptoach 8.0 7.9 1,7 1.6 2. YN Volumo: 20 20 32 19 9. IAS, eppxoach A A A A 7. RT Volumo: 10 20 35 5 10. Deley, Intereection 7.7 4, Peek Nouz Fectoct 0.71 0.71 0.17 0.77 tl, IAS, InCecaectlon A 5. Flow Rete bT: 61 12 27 12 6. Flow Rate TH; 25 25 41 24 7, Flow Rata RT, 12 ZS 45 6 8. Flow Ra[e iotaL 100 64 110 44 9, Prop, Neavy Vehiclot 0.02 ,0.02 0.02 0.02 10. subjoct Approach 1 1 l 1 ll. Qppoeinq Approaeh 1 1 l 1 12. Conflieting Approaeh 1 1 l 1 13. Geanet[y Croup 1 1 ! 1 14. T (Tlme !n Houre), 0.250 Workaheet 3- 9eturation Hcadway Adjustment Workeheet North Bound 9ou[h Baund Ea3t Bovnd Haat Bound G1 L1 Gl L1 1, Flow Peta 'totale 100 64 110 44 2. Flow Rata Lii 61 12 23 12 3. Flow Rate ATo 12 15 45 6 4. Prop Li !n lana+ 0.61 0,20 0.21 0,29 5. Pcop RT in lenss 0.13 0,40 0.41 0,15 6. Pxop, Hoavy Vuhlcle; 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1. 6eometey Gcoup , 1 1 ] 1 8, hLt-adj by Table 10•18 0.20 0,20 0,20 0.14 9, hRT•edj by Tahl• 10-19 -0,60 -0.60 -0,60 -0,60 10. hNV-edj Teble 10-18 1,70 1,70 1.70 1.70 11. hadj 0.08 -0.17 -O,IY 0,00 Wockaheet 0- Depezture Hoaduay and Sesvico 41oe Nockh Bound 9outh Bound Eaet 8ound P7eat BounO L1 L1 Ll L1 • l. Tatel lene flou xete 100 64 I10 49 2. hd, inltiel velue 9,2 3,2 3.2 7•2 7. x, initiel 0.09 0,06 0.10 0.04 4. hd, flnel velue 4.4 4.2 9.1 0.9 L T R L T R L T R NCS: Onalgnallted Inie:eectiona Relaoee 3,Ic Y N N N Y N N Y Y TNO-NAY STOP CONYAOLIxwSC) ANaLYSis <hennolised; N AnalyaCi iha T=anapo Gxoup Gredes 0.00 Intetaection: Spcague Avenue/COnklin 9tteet Count Datei Futuce W1thr.Project llme Pertodi PM Paak Lane wage foz movamcnte 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lone 3 Intesaection Oclenta[loni 6eet-Weat Major St. L T R L f R L T R ~ Vehicle Volumo Deto: , Y N N N Y Y N N t! Movementss 1 2' 7 0 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Channolteed: N Gxedet 0.00 volume; 31 1005 15 35 BBS 17 15 19 45 14 7 aa ' NFA; 55 2092 16 38' 962 18 16 15 60 15 B 48 PHPr 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lona ueage foc movementa 10,11612 epproech: PNV; 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ~ ' ~ y Y Y N N N N tl N . , PedaeCCSpn Volumo DaEa: ~ Chennalixedo !1 Gredet 0.00 MovnmC11CD l ~ • Rloul Lane wldth: Daia tor Computing 6[fact of Delay to Hajor Streat Vehielea: Walk epoedi . 9 Blockegea 6eetbaund weetbound 9hared !n volume, raajor th vehlcles: 0 0 ' Medlen Type: TWLTL 4hared ln volume, meior zt vehielea: 0 4 1 ot vohlclee: 5 Sa[ flou rete, majar Ch vehlcleeo 1700 1700 . 9et flor rate, majoc rt vehiclesi 1100 1100 Plered approech Moveteente: Number ot major atcoot throuyh lanee: 2 2 N of vehlcleai Horthbound 0 1 of vehlcloei 9outhbound 0 Lenqih of 3tudy peciod, hz3: 0.25 Lene uaege !or roovernenta 1,2i3 approneh: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 4tockeheeC G Ctitlcal Gap and Follou-up time talculation. L 7 R L T R L T R Critlea] Gap Caleulations: Y N N N Y N N Y Y Plovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Chennelized; ' H t c,beee 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6,5 6.9 Giede: 0,00 , C c,hv 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0,02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 ~ [ c,g 0.2 0.2 0,1 0.2 0.2 0.1 Lano uaeqe fox movementa 4,596 apptoech; C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1• Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: Pedeet:ien Impedence Factaz 1.00 1.00 1 atege 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cap. Adj, taetot due to trcgedlog mvicnt 0.94 0.92 1 aCeq• 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Novement Capacity 282 231 t c 1 e[aqe 4.1 4.1 ?.S 6.4 6.9 7,5 6.9 6.9 2 atage 4.1 4.1 6.5 5.5 6.9 6.5 515 6.9 Part 3- 9inyle Stege ° Pallou Op Time ealculatianoi con[lleclnq flwn 2268 2267 Movmment 1 4 Y 8 9 lU 11 12 Potentiel Capacity CO 90 Pedaetrian Impedence Pectoc 1.00 1.00 t[,beee 2.2 2.2 3.5 0.0 3.3 3.5 0.0 3.3 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impedinq mvmnt 0,86 0.86 t f,HV 1.U 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 Movement Capacity 35 35 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4,0 3.3 Reault [or 2 atoqo proceee; Aorkeheet 6 impedenca and capaclty eqvetione e 0.98 0.98 y 1.04 1,58 9tap 1; PT Prom Minoc St. 9 12 C c 190 183 Ptobabllity of awue IPae St. 0,92 0,96 Con2lScting E'lowa 559 490 Potentlal Capacity 476 524 Pedestcian Impedenco FacCOi 1.00 1.00 Movomont Capacity 476 524 Workeheot 'Ib - CompuCetion ot tha efEeat of Two-ataqe gep oecoptanco Prababllity ot puwe Cree St. 0.87 0.91 Step 4i LT lzam Mlnoc St. 1 10 Pect 1- Plrat 6cego step 21 LT Prom Mejoc 9c. 4 1 Contlicting Floue 1211 1047 Conlllcclnq Flora 1109 980 PoCenCial Capaclty 193 244 Pocenciel Capacity 626 700 Fedeattian Impedento Paetar 1.00 1.00 Pedaetrian impedanco Factoi 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj, tactot due ta Impeding mvrnt 0.92 0.94 Mowment Capacity 626 700 MoveaanC Capacity 178 229 P=obability of Quouo fzea 9t. 0.94 0.92 Pa:t 2- 4econd Step• Woxkahaet 7e - Caaputetlon ot the oftect ot two-acago gap accnptanca ConPlicting Floun ' 561 669 Potenttol Ceoacity 480 416 Step J; TH Ctom Minoz BC. B ll Pedeetrion Irepedance Fector 1.00 1.00 Part 1- FSzec stege ~ Cap. Adj. laccoi dw to Impedinq nvmnt 0.81 0.75 Movemnnt Capacity 398 313 Contllctinp Flowa 1211 1007 Potential Capacity 253 303 PedoatYlen Impedenae Faotor 1.00 1.00 Paa[ Slnple SCape Cap. Adj. tectot dua to impeding mvosnt 0.92 0.91 Novoment Capacity 233 285 Conflicting Flove 2772 1712 Prabability of Queue f[ae 9t. 0.91 0.97 Potentiol Capacity 53 56 rodaettlan Impedence Facco[ 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedence tectoc 0.83 0.80 Pact 2- Secund Steqe Maj. L, Min T Adj. t2p Faatoc. 0.87 0.04 Cep, Adj. fnctoc dun to Impedinq mvmnt 0.79 0.74 Contlictlnp Roua 1047 1220 Movement Capacity 42 C] Potentlal Capacity 300 251 ~ ~ ~ ~ r r ~r ~ ~ ~ ~■r ~ ~ ~ ir ~ ~ ~ ~ Aaeult for 2 etage proceae; ° a 0.98 0.98 y 0.45 0.80 C t 173 209 ' ° Gorkeheet B Shared Lens Celculetiona Sherad Lane Calcule[lons Movement 7 A 9 10 11 12 , I-----' II---'----'--..._.."I I -------------II I I II I v(vph) 16 15 60 15 B CB Movomant Capacity 173 190 476 209 163 529 ~ 9Aazed Lane Capattty 367 341 Wotkaheee 10 deley,quaus lengeA, end L09 Movamant 1 a 7 B 9 10 il 12 I I I ~ I I I I I II I v(vph) 35 38 16 79 71 C m(vph) 700 626 173 767 343 v/c 0,08 0.06 0.09 0.20 0.21 954 quaue lanpch Contcol Delny 10.6 11.1 27.9 11.3 I8.2 IAS , B B D C C approach Deley 19.2 18.2 Approach LOS C C ° L T N L T k L T R HC5i Unalgnnllted Intereactione Releas• 7.10 Y Y N 11 N H N ti N TtifO-i7AY STOP CAN'fROL(7H9C) ANALY919 Channellced: N Melyn[i The Tcanepo Group C[ede: 0.00 Intereection: weat Dtive/Velley qay Count Date: P1ttuC0 Wlth-PcojeCt Sime Pexiod; PH Peok Lane uaege for movamenta 1,899 approach: Lane 1 Len• 2 Lane 3 Interaec[lon Oclentation; Eaat-WeaC Hajoc 5t. L T N 1 T A L T R Voh/cle Volume Datei Y N Y N N N N N N Movemente: 2 ] 0 5 7 9 Chennalixed; N Gredo: 0,00 volume; 59 14 46 32 B 21 ~ HFR; 66 16 91 36 9 27 PNP: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane uaege foc u:ovement• I0,11912 eppcopch: PHVI 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02 0,02 Lane ! Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N H N H N N Fodoetcian Volume Data: Channelltedr N Gudo i 0.00 Hovernantot Flow: Lane uidth: Da[a fox Computing Ettect ot Dolay Go Major Stxeet Vehicles: Nelk apsod: 8 Blockageo Eeetbound Weetbound sheced !n volume, majoc Ch vehiclea: 0 32 Medien Typei None Shaced !n volume, major rt vehicloet D 0 U oL vahiclea; 0 Sat flav xate, maio[ th vehicloa: 1700 1700 Spt flav cate, au+joc zt vehicles: 1700 1700 Plered epproach Novomanta: trumber of inejo= ecreec thiough ianeo; 1 1 p ot vohlclut Northbound 0 N of vahicles, 9outhbound 0 Lenqth of atudy peciod, hce; 0.25 Lana uaeqo toz movementa 1,243 eppcoeeht Lane 1 Lane 2 Lano 7 Roskehuet 9 Ctltltel Gap and Pollou-up tlme caleulation. L T R L T R L T R Csiticai Gap Celculationa: N Y Y N N N N N N Movemont 9 7 9 Chenneli:edi N t c,baae 4.1 7.1 6.2 Gradet 0.00 ~ [ c,Av 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0,02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 Lane ueaqs,foz mowm*nCn 4,566 eppcoachi G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,It 0.0 0.7 0.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~■r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r t c,T, 1 ateg• 0.00 0.00 0,00 I II I y(vpA) 9 27 C c Movemant Capacity 757 989 1 acnge 4.1 6.4 6.2 Shared Lana Capacity 918 • - Follou Up Time Celculntlonai NovOinent Q 7 9 woikehoet 10 delay,quoue length, end LOs t f,beae 2.2 3.5 3.3 Movement 1 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 t f,NV 0.9 0.9 0.9 P hV 0.02 0.02 0.02 I""" '""'"II I t C 2.2 3.5 3.7 I II I I I I I v(vph) 51 36 Fiorkaheet 6 Impedana and ugaelty equationa ~ C m(vpA) 1916 918 v/c 0,03 0,04 9Cep 1: RT f:om Minar St. 9 12 958 quaue lenqGh Con[rol Doley 7.5 9.1 Conflictinq Flow3 73 L09 A A PoCentiel Capacity 989 Appcoach Delay 9.1 Pedeatclen Impadanee Pactoc 1.00 Appcoeeh LOS A Movement Capacity 989 Probablltty ot Quaue tree 9t, 0,97 , 9tep 2: LT 2xam riajor 9t. 4 1 NorkaheeC 11 Sha=ed Mayoc LT tmpadance and Delay Conflieting Plowa B1 Rank 1 Delay Caleulatione Vatmtlel Capacity 1516 Hovement Z 5 Pedeeufan Impedance Fac[oc . 1,00 , Hovemont Capacity 1516 P oj 1.00 0.97 Probebillty of pueua free St. 0.97 ' v il 0 32 Mej. L 9hated ln. Prob. Quew Bru 9t. 0,91 V 12 0 0 8 il 1700 1700 y 12 1700 1700 ' Scep 41 L4 from Minoc 9C. 7 10 P. Oj 1.00 0.97 D rtaj le2t 0.0 7.5 Conflicting Flowa 211 11 numboc majoc at lame 1 1 Potontial Capacity 117 Delay, renk 1 mvmte 0.0 0.7 PadaStrlan Impadance FecCOr 1.00 lfaj. L, Min Icryedenca factoz 0.91 Nej. L, tlin 7 IWj. Imp Pec[oc. 0.91 Cep, Adi. Lacto= dw Co Impeding mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity 757 Watkeheat 8 9he:ed Lane Calculatlans Shated Lena Calculatione Movement 7 g 9 10 11 12 I-'-"' -""'II I ~ ~■r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L S R G 7 R L Z A HC3: Unnlgnel!=ed inceisocClone Releaee 7.Ic Y Y N N N ti N N N TWO-NAY STOP CONTPOL(TN9C) ANALYSI9 Channallxed: N Analyet; The Trenapo Gioup ~ Gzade; 0,00 Intecsectlonz Yest Dxlve/Valley Way Coun[ Datet Puture Alth-Ptoject I Time Pezlod: PM Peak Lane uaege Eor moveaenta 7,8C9 epproach: f Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 ~ InCOrenction Orlentation: Easc-west Hejoc Sc. L T R L T R L T R Vehlcla Volume Detei Y H Y N N N N N N Movemente: 2 J a 5 7 9 Channelixed; H Crede: 0.00 Volume: 79 a 10 76 2 6 MfRs AB 4 11 84 2 7 PHP: 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.90 Lane uaaqe toz movomante 10,1Ic12 epproach: PNV; 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 1 L ! R L T P L T R N N N a N H N N H Padestrien Volvms Dotai CMnnelltedi N Grada: 0.00 Movemente: Flowi Lane aldthf Date for Camputinq Effect ot Delay to Majot 5troo[ Vehiclaat Walk apeedi 8 Blockege: Bastbound Weatbound Shexed ln voluma, majoc th vehicles, 0 76 Medlan Types Nono 9hired ln volune, Aejoc rt vehiclent 0 ' 0 Y of vehieleai 0 9et llow re[o, najo[ Ch vahiclea: 1700 1700 9ec flow ca[e, aajai cC vehiclaie 1700 1700 FlareO epp:oach Movementes Numbec at moior atraet thiough lanoet 1 1 N ot vehiclea. Northbound 0 1 ot vehiclea. Southbound 0 Lanqth o[ study pe=iod, hca: 0.25 Lana uaeps for movamenta 1,243 epptoach; Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane J workaheat 4 Ccitlcel Gep end Pollow-up tlne calculatlon. L T A L 4 R L T R Criticel Gep Celeulationet N Y Y QI N H N N tt Movement ( 7 9 Channelltedi N t c,bas• 0.1 7.1 6.2 Gcade: 0.00 t e,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0,2 0.1 Lane ueaqe foc movementa 4,966 appzoaehi G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 t 3,1c 0.0 0.7 0.0 t C,T: i 1 elaqe 0.00 0.00 0.00 I II I v(vph) 2 1 , ~ ° Novement Capacity 788 968 1 otoqs G.1 6.4 6.2 Shezed Lana Capacity 916 Fo11or Up Time CelculetlOnoi Movemant 4 1 9 Worklheet 10 deley,auoua lengch, end LOS t I,base 2.2 3.5 3,3 Movamcnt 1 C 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 e nv 0.02 o.oz o,oz 1 1i ~ [ t 2.2 3.5 3.~ ~ II I I I I I v(vph) 11 9 Horkaheef 6 Itnpedance and cepeclty aquetions C m(vph) 1902 916 v/C 0.01 0,01 9tep 1: RT lcom Mlnor St, 9 12 95B queue lenqth Contiol De1ay 7.0 9.0 ContlScCinp Floae 90 1A9 A A Patantiel Capacity 968 Apptoeeh Doloy 9.0 Pedontclan Impodancs Pectur 1.00 AADroeM LOS A Hovement Cnpacity 968 Probebillty of ¢uoue ttee St. 0.99 Step 2: LY fcom Hejot SC. 0 1 Norkaheec 11 Shered Hajor LT Impedance end Oeley Conlllcting Flowa 92 Rank 1 Oelay CalculaClOne Potentiel Capacity 1502 Movement 2 5 Pedattlen tmpadance Fectot 1.00 Novamunt Capacity 1502 ~ P oj 1.00 0,99 Proba6illty of Queue free St. 0.99 V 11 0 76 Maj. L Shered ln. Pcob. Queuo Pcee St. 0.99 V 12 D 0 S il 1700 1700 ,9 12 1700 1700 Step Ot LT from Hlnor St. 7 10 P• Oj , 1.00 0.99 D mej ]e!C 0.0 7.4 Conf!letinp Flove 196 N numbos majox et lanee 1 2 Potential Capacity 793 pelay, rank 1 mvmta 0.0 6.1 Pedoatilen lmpadance Fectoc 1.00 Maj. L, Min i Iapedance factor 0.99 Mcj. L, Hln T Adj. Imp Pactor. 0.99 Cap, Adj, tactor due to Impedinp mvmnt 0.99 Movamont Capacity 78B Mockaheet B Shazed Lane Calculallcna Shaced Lane Calculetlona Novurant ' 7 B 9 10 11 12 - I°---- ---°•II I I ' ~ Appendix C 1 Trip Generation Summary Sheets ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ : r■~ ~ , wi ~~•~v~ ~ . , ~ ~s o,3 9 ~ 4 f~~i~✓ ~~yi , ~1~0~ ~~o~rG.w~ ~r~ J ~ .5 ~ t ~4X00 ~ 7-p . , ~ ~ ~ fiG. ~t,rl'~►r• w ~ ~~C~J'~ /r"~~ ~ , . 4?a W6;s4 a . • _ •~..~,~w_._.~,..~.. w_,. .I...~ _..~.•yy..._~ ' . _...e... . i i . , .._~--r ...r_, ~ ~ rr~ r, -e-..~ , y ~ ~1 ~ i_.~ r..~• r.~ /N'~N ~ . r . n. ~ . •.r..... . 1.. . ~j 4 i ~~O J • E~G/E Z, v ';i , i r~ • : ~'~~i ~ ,~v✓~ ~A . f'Gt ~ Q `"z~ Q t i • ; a . ~'i ` ~ ~ t' 74 . t~ ~ ~A, ke ~;/vel i~ `J~~ ' ~ l ~5 ~ ~ - ~ 1~~ • 'ok ~ - 3 • . e- a ~ - a ! E • « O! ~7 ~ . • _ - - .~'4 ' ' . . . ~ • , . . 4 { - i~•~ UH1 I tUJH I tk Ai.tg 9 ' O0 13 : 47 F'. 1,r1 AUG-09-zG0MED i 13; 23 Tbe Transpo Group - 40kaoe NO 504 E1733! i P, OOZACZ PFfOJC-CT wo: oATE:R-1 0 -FRom:4 0-6 : OOpm The ,kOG.A'/'.i,pjLJ;Silverlake Apts.PMo,,,E:772-4129 ' Tra.ij 5,•692 & 698 W. Wilbur, CDA 105 units CIIDCV 4r jq : ~ - .y Q Al V3 ff PO Box 1371, Hayden Lake, ID 83835 WHl { tWH ! tK F't.tg q' W 13':47 P. OL' AUG-09-ZGOQ,flE~~ 13~23 Tbe traaspo Groap - Spojane (RO50414?3311 P,002~'QG~ . - - P~c-r,~: oaTE: 8 _ 1'5 _ ~PE. FWW. 4:OOpm_6:OOpm ~ Z*0,r-AT.OIc7AJ:FairwoodApts . PMcrc 664-3797 ~ ~ ~ t Q L.. G~~.~ Sht c. Tri I !b-P o ~ svai~c~r: v a ~ jv- --I/e-vc s! 1905 W. Appleway, CDA 694 t - ~ - ~n~~ c7..~1-tc. ~'j .~.r..f 1' ~ c v•~ . ~ q /3 a ~ ~ ► ~ ~I~ . . •-~-r~- ~r , . . f~ . ~ *r.w1 . ~r • ~Ag ~ .~-~t'.~►~li ' t . 5 . ~ ~ . „ /D 3 '70 ___..Coun ter : Carol Bryslon . _ _ ~ . PO Box 1371, Hayden Lake ID. 83835 ' ~ - • . f:RoM . SPO T11riV ~ J, ~ ppTE~ ~ p~-{pNE: - ~ PA03ECT NC)= - - d -ro: ~ SUOJEC'T:r.... - ~ /wVO6f ~tdi~✓ /~r ~ . . 77/0~ ~ e2,0 ,,,1~✓~- ~ ✓ f ~ . 17 • . , ~t - as~- 31 3S to P ~ O 17 ~~f ~ ~ ~,p • . ~ ► ~ 7/ . - 1 I ~r • J ~ ~ If . •1~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ~ . ` op ~ r ' ~ wMl i twH ItK Ftt.tg W'Ix► 1.~ ; u( r. ut ~ AUG-09-ZOOO~~~Qj 13,23 TbQ Traaspo Groop - SpoLane WWQ4~~IMli P.OOI!~GZ r . PRO.SFCT NO: CAT@: 8 -„4,= O*AE: FHOfd' 4_ n n D[11_6: 00 pm ~ ,44<_A7'.j,OjLJ :Lakewood Ranch PHONE; 765-4111 ' Tnsp sva,Ecr: m ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 rsn A 8 0 u n i t s tIIDCV V. ' ~ ~ _ . _ ~ . . . ~I7~"'~t ~v~~~0 ~ d ~slJ ~f.~/S •i.i r161t ~ ~ Y 1 (T a I J~J~ I ~ ~ ~ r : , ti ~ r . . . ~ rr ~ .0 • , HI / . i ~ • .,,,r . f • r ~ ~ Counter :.Carol B.ryson._._..---.... P.O.Box 1371 Hayden Lake ID. 83835 Whl I tWH ► c.K Huy y~, ls ~ u r r. ~1~ 11; ~3 Tbe Traaspo Gronp - 8p4~,aoe WW04,74133! i P. 00?!4a? ~ Pao,C-cT No; oATE:8 - C) - QOTIME: FROM. 4: 0 0 pm - 6: 0 0 pm The . j&0<-A'l':L~7AJ:CDA Senior HousiRg,,,E; 762-9809 ~ sua►~cT: Il r 7712 N. Heartland Dr. CDA 38 unlts . Y ~ 0 ,1~! ~ J J~ ~ . ~ l a ~ ~ o• . . . ~ . . ~t ~ o 0 0 : . AN ~ . ~ O f. , tJ A. • ~~.q..~..~ ~ . . . ' Counter:Carol 4Bryson_ , POBox~1371 Hayden Lake ID. 83835 ~ _ . Appendix 3 Signal Warrant Summary Analysis ~ ~ 1 tf'inWarrants JB Technolov Inc Traffic Signal Warrant Summary Report 1 Canyon Lakes Plaza Monday, August 28, 2000 Warrant Status Warrant 1- Minimum Vehicle Volume. Not Satisfied ~ W ant 2 - Int arr erruption of Continuous Traffic. Not Satisfied Warrant 8- Combination of Warrants. Not Satisfied ` Warrant 9- Four Hour Volumes. Not Satisfied Warrant 10 - Peak Hour Delay. Not Satisfied Warrant 11 - Peak Hour Volume. Not Satisfied , , , ~ Page 3 WinWarrants JB TechnoJop Inc. Traffic Signal Warrants Report 1 Canyon Lakes Plaza Monday, August 28, 2000 , StudY Location: SPrague Avenue and Conklin Street Major Street: Sprague Avenue Direction of Travel: East and West Number of Lanes: 2 85th Percentile Speed Greater than 40 M.P.H.: No ' Lies within a built up area of an isolated area of population less than 10,000: No Minor Street: Conklin Street Direction of Travel: North and South Number of Lanes: 1 Controlled by Stop Sign: Yes Warrants: Warrant 1- Minimum Vehicular Volume: Warrant Not Met ~ Major Street Minor Street ' (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) Minimum 600 150 Study-Maj or 1,362 56 Study-Minor 1,309 58 Number of hours volume met or exceeded criteria: Warrant 2- Intenuption of Continuous Traffic: Warrant Not Met Major Street Minor Street (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) Minimum 900 75 , Study-Maj or 1,362 56 Study-Minor 1,309 58 ' Number of hours volume met or exceeded criteria: 1 ' Page 1 ' WinWarrants JB Technolo7 hic. Traffic Signal Warrants Report (cont.) ~ MondaY, August 28, 2000 Warrant 8- Combinations of Warrants: Warrant Not Met ' o 80 /o of volume required by the Minimum Veh.icular Volume. (Warrant 1): No Major Street Minor Street , (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) Minimum 480 120 Study-Major 1,362 56 ~ Study-Minor 1,309 58 80% of volume required by the Interruption of Continuous Traffic. (Warrant 2): No ' Maj or Street Minor Street (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) Minimum 720 60 ~ StudY-MaJ'or 1,362 56 Study-Minor 1,309 58 1 Warrant 9 _ Four Hour Volumes: Warrant Not Met The following four hour volumes were compared to the data interpreted from the graph as shown on Figure 4-7, on page 4C-11 of the MUTCD. Maj or Street Minor Street (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) 1 Study-Major 1,639 67 Study-Minor 1,639 67 ~ Warrant 10 - Peak Hour Delay: Warrant Not Met , The total delay experienced by the traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals four vehicle hours: 1 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds ~ 100 vph: 84 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph: 2157 ' Warrant 11 - Peak Hour Volume: Warrant Not Met The following peak hour volumes were compared to the data interpreted from the graph , as shown on Figure 4-5, on page 4C-9 of the MLTTCD. Major Street Minor Street (Veh. Per Hr) (Veh. Per Hr) Study-Major 1;958 85 Study-Minor 1,958 85 , I I I page 2 ' WrnWarran[s JB Technolo~ylnc. Traffic Signal Warrant Data Report ' Canyon Lakes Plaza Monday, August 28, 2000 ' Study Location: SPrague Avenue and Conklin Street Major Street: Sprague Avenue t Direction of Travel: East and West Number of Lanes: 2 85th Percentile Speed Greater than 40 M.P.H.: No Lies within a built up area of an isolated area of population less than 10,000: No A divided street with a median island that can be used for pedestrian refuge: No Another traffic signal is within 300 feet: No A rural or suburban highway that enters or traverses a city: No A major route of an offical plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area , traffic and transportation plan: Yes Is part of street or highway system that serves as the pnncipal network for through traffic flow: Yes Minor Street: Conklin Street Direction of Travel: North and South Number of Lanes: 1 Controlled by Stop Sign: Yes , Traffic Counts: Count Date: Saturday, January 01, 2000 Sprague Avenue(Major Street) - Total Entering Volumes Time Volume Time Volume Time Volume Mid 142 8 1,360 4 1,813 1 62 9 13,272 5 209 2 43 10 1,255 6 1,881 3 34 11 1,388 7 1,535 , 4 38 Noon 11,309 8 1,131 5 93 1 13,480 9 931 6 248 2 1,362 10 584 , 7 620 3 1639 11 329 ~ 15 Minute Peak Hour Volumes: , Sprague Avenue Conklin Street Interval Volume Interval Volume 0 417 0 20 15 500 15 21 30 544 30 23 45 497 45 21 1 Page 4 ' - Win6Varrants J6 Technoloq lnc. Traffic Signal Warrant Data Report (cont.) ' MondaY, August 28, 2000 Traffic Counts (eont.): ' Conklin Street(Minor Street) _ Volumes for One Approach Time Volume Time Volume Time Volume Mid 5 8 60 4 72 1 2 9 52 5 84 2 1 10 50 6 71 3 1 11 56 7 58 4 2 Noon 58 8 42 ~ 5 4 1 61 - 9 34 6 10 2 56 10 20 7 28 3 67 11 12 Pedestrian Volumes: Pedominant pedest,rian crossing speed is less than 3.5 ft/sec: No Coordinated traffic signal on each side of study location: No Volume Number of Hour N/S Gaps 1 0 0 ' 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 School Crossing: Is the school crosing established: No The study time in minutes: 0 Number of adequate gaps during the study time period: 0 , Accident Experience. . Begirming date of 12 month period: No Date ' Total number of correctible accidents during 12 month period: 0 Type of Accidents: Right Angle: 0 Read End: 0 Approach Turn: 0 , Head On: 0 Other: 0 Adequate mal of less restrictive remedies with satisfactones observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the accident frequency: No The traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progessive movement: No ' Page 5 WinWarrants JB Technoloyv Inc. Traffic Signal Warrant Data Report (cont.) ' MondaY, August 28_ 2000 Peak Hour Delay: ~ Is the study locataon a Tee" intersection: No Number of Vehicle-Hours observed: 1 Total entering volume for study peak hour: 2,157 Approach volu.me on minor street where Vehicle-Hours was observed: 84 Peak Hour Volumes: Sprague Avenue Conklin Street (Both Approaches) (Separate Approaches) Interval Volume Interval Volume Interval Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 15 0 15 0 15 0 30 0 30 0 30 0 45 0 45 0 45 0 Date Data Stored in Database: Monday, August 28, 2000 ' ' , ' Page 6 ' Valley Way Residential Warrant Analys+s ' 08/26/1999 (wedl 08127/1999 (thurs) 08128/1999 ffril 3-Dav Avq: WB EB WB EB WB E6 WB EB Tot. 12:00 AM 68 75 51 51 60 63 123 1:00 AM 18 27 26 36 22 32 54 2:00 AM 13 19 19 23 16 21 37 3:00 AM 14 14 11 19 13 17 29 4:00 AM 14 12 25 14 20 13 33 5:00 AM 34 32 45 49 40 41 80 6:00 AM 107 115 103 102 105 109 214 7:00 AM 319 224 295 232 307 228 535 8:00 AM 699 485 618 544 659 515 1173 9:04 AM 539 475 613 568 576 522 1098 10:00 AM 504 477 605 579 555 528 1083 11:00 AM 577 529 655 633 616 581 1197 12:00 PM 653 390 633 583 643 487 1130 1:00 PM 657 517 684 696 671 607 1277 2:00 PM 635 470 603 642 619 556 1175 3:00 PM 694 553 788 792 741 673 1414 , 4:00 PM 795 719 780 834 788 777 1564 ~ ~'!GI> _ _ ..88A ~ . .~~F~897 i~`•: 807 ~j~ 6:00 PM 805 852 760 828 783 840 1623 7:00 PM 619 686 655 688 UJ,~ + as 637 687 1324 8:00 PM 461 519 455 516 458 518 976 9:00 PM 382 422 367 436 P e r K pE 375 429 804 10:00 PM 236 258 249 304 223 281 504 11:00 PM 142 139 123 163 133 151 284 Tot. 6926 6385 9839 9829 3066 2850 9951 9472 19423 1 ' ' 24hour Volume Forecasts MUTCD Warrants.xis 08/28/2000 8:47 AM Vailey Way Residentia( Warrant Anaiysis 1 L aoos - Pfv ~~c-r _ Z Forecasf. ~ ' WB EB ToL NB SB Tot TEV 2M 12:00 AM 69 73 142 5 5 10 152 Years Dit. 1:00 AM 26 37 62 2 3 5 67 2:00 AM 19 24 43 1 2 3 46 % Grawth. 3:00 AM 14 19 34 1 1 2 36 '396 4:00 AM 23 15 38 Z 1 3 40 5:00 AM 46 47 93 4 3 7 100 6:00 AM 122 126 248 10 9 18 266 7:00 AM 356 264 620 28 18 46 666 8:00 AM 763 596 1360 6019 41 101 1461 ' 9:00 AM 668 605 1272 52 42 94 1367 10:00 AM 643 612 1255 50 42 93 1348 11:04 AM 714 674 13880 56 47 103 1490 12:00 PM 745 564 1309 • 5' 39 98 1407 1:00 PM 777 703 14804) 610 49 110 1590 2:00 PM 718 645 13620 ~ 5* 45 101 1463 3:00 PM 859 780 1639e 67e 54 121 1760 4:00 PM 913 900 1813Q 720 62 134 1947 ;OSQU PM~_~__ i 2M o ~ =14~ • 21~. 6:00 PM 907 9741 V1881 Q~ 710 68 139 2020 ' 7:00 PM 738 796 15350 5A 55 113 1648 8:00 PM 531 600 1131 42 42 83 1214 ~ 9:00 PM 434 497 931 34 34 69 1000 10:00 PM 258 326 584 20 23 43 627 11:00 PM 154 175 329 12 12 24 353 Tot. 11567 10988 22557 907 762 1669 24226 Org. TEV Per. TEV Adj. WB Adj. EB Adj. NB Adj. SB TEV 0- min. 417 23.29b 249 ~ 218 --pt 20 15 501 15 - min. 447 24.9% 267 > 23345c)-o 21 16 537 30 - min. 487 27.1 % 290 > 254 - s O 23 18 585 ' 45 - min. 445 24.896 265 > 232 -4q7 21 16 534 1796 10096 1071 937 84 65 2157 ' ' I 24hour Volume Forecasts MUTCD Warrants.xis 08/28/2000 8:47 AM t ` ' , , • SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EYAMINER RE: Zone Reclassification from the Urban ) Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone to the ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Applicant: Jeff Morse ) AND DECISION File No. ZE-20-00 ) 1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION Proposal: Application for a rezonc from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, for the developinent of 125 multi-family dwelling units on approximately S acres of land. Decision: Approved, subject to conditions. The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision: H. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT A. Generallnformation: Applicant: Jeff Morse, Storhaug Engineering, 1322 North Monroe, Spokane, WA 99201 Site Owner: Sonrise Land LLC, 11219 East Sundown Drive, Spokane, WA 99206 Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, north of and adjacent to the right of way for Main Avenue, in the SW '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EVVM, Spokane County, Washington. Parcel Number: County Assessor's tax parcel nos. 45133.1011,.0901, and.0902 Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. The site is also located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zoning Code. Comprehensive Plan: Urban category. The property is also locatcd within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and Urban lmpact Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan. IUGA: The site is located inside the interim urban growth area boundal-ies designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 1 -0 • • ' 7 , ~ Envaronmental Review: ADetennination of Nansigiiificaiice (DNS) was issued on Deceinber 15, 2000. Site Descript:on: The site is approxii-Tlately Saci-es jn size, is generally flat, aiid cansists of 3 tax parcels. An existing residence, and associated aut'buildings are found in the northwest Rartion of the subjec.t property. T'he renla,inder ofthe site is vacaiit. Area Road Systern: Valley Way Avenue in the viciiliCy is designated as aCollector Arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan. .Broadway Aveilue, Sprague Avenue aizd Su11iva.n Road in tlle area are designated as Friilcipa1 A.rtea-ials. Maizi Aventie soutlz of ti7e site consists Of an unirnpraveci cou7ity right of way- , Ttle :I,nterstate 90 fr~eway (1-90)lSullivan R,aad freeway interchange is lacated over a half I1`l11e ]-iOrthweSt of tI1e site, di=t distax7ce. Tlze Couiity at7d zhe WashinatoTi State Depart2~lerit of Traxisportation (WSDOT) are scli.eduled to ~-iake irnprovements to sucli iiiterchange 13-A 2001, to II-npI'QVe acCesS a11~ trar1C flOVI(. Tt1c C[]Ullty FeGe17C1y widened EvCrgTet']'1 Road, lacated so1-ne distance west of Sullivan Raad, to 4 laiies, ar1d WSDOT'i 5 1ri the proCeSS of C0mp1eting a t7eW freeway iiltercliange at Evergreen Road and 1-90. The interchange project wi11 pravide oa-i and aff-rarnps for fteeway access, and an overpass over T--90 tY~~t will extend Evergrf,~en Road fr'om Mission A-venue to Indiar~~ Avenue, on the north side of I-90. Surroundirtg coaditions: Sprague Avenue and Sullivan Road comprise rnaja~ i-raffic and corrimercial corridars in the area,. The land lying betweeri Broadvvay Aven.ue and In,terstate 90, betveen Sulliuan Road and Canklin Road, is designated in the Major Commercial categoi-y of the Comprellensive Plasi, is zaned Reg'tonal Business (B-3), and is developed with major commercial iFSes ar vacant land. This includes a recenlly developed Walmart store. Tlae Spokane VaTley Mall, a large regional shopping mal1, aiid other nearby retail uses, have recently be~~-i developed northwest of the I-901Sullivarl Raad intercharzge. The land lyiizg directly north, east and uxest of the. site is designated in the Urban category of the Coxs-iprehensive Plan. The Iand lacated near or adjacent to the site, to the east and west, is zoned Urban Residential-3,5 (U-R-3.5), and as developed vvith single-family hotnes on ]ots of various size, or lies vacant. The rectangular area of land lying betweei~ the site and Valley Way Avenue is zoned T,TR-3.5 and is impraved with ? single-fanlily resideiices. A strip of land abutting the site an ~he ufest is vacant, while ~~e 2.2-acre parce1 that abuts the depth of the site on the east contains a single-,tamily xesidence. Residences ar.e found along Canl-lin Raad easter1y ❑f the site. The land located nortll of the site across ValleyWay Avenue is zaned UR-3.5 anci U'rban Residentia]- i(UR-?), and is developed with single-fami]y fiomes on ua-ban-sized lots and or larget parools. Furtlier t+o the north, a 10-acre. pa.rcel z.Qned LTR-3.5 is propos+ed for developmeni of a liospice care center, wsth access provided to Conk]in Raad. T'he land lacated along Sullivan Raad and Sprague Avenue in the area is designated in the MajQr Commercral category. 'The Majar Commerci.al categai-y extends north of Spra.gue Avenue to Nlain Avenue extended, in the, area, sautherly of the site. The land lyln'g d'rectly soizthwest of the site is zoned Utban Residential-22 (UP,-22), ancf is developed with aii apartanent camplex. Th~-, remaiiider of the land lying southerly of the site, betvveen Sprague Avenue and Mail'i HE Findin.gs, Conclusions and DecisiorI ZE-20-00 P age 2 ~ ' • ' . Avenue, is primarily zoned and developed for major cominercial uses. A large Community Business (B-2) zone, improved with a Fred Meyers store, is located approximately 250 feet southwest of the site, at the nortlleast corner of Sprague and Sullivan. A number of recent land use actions have taken place in the vicinity of the site, which allow more intensive commercial or residential development and zoning, as discussed on page 2 of the Staff Report. Proposal: Application for a zone i-eclassification from the UR-3.5 zone fio the UR-22 zone, for the development of multi-family residences. A revised sitc plan of record was submittcd at the public hearing, dated 1-3-01. The site plan illustrates the westerly portion of the site developed for SO senior housing units, contained in several single-story buildings. The site plan illustrates the easterly portion of the site developed for 75 general multi-family dwelling units, in a total of five (5) 2.5-story buildings. The site plan also illustrates a ceiitra] recreation area and an optional maintenance building. The maximum building height indicated on the site plan is 38 feet, which Would apply to the 2.5 story buildings proposed in the easterly portion of the project. The building coverage illustrated on the site plan is approximately 21%, and the residential density of the project is 15.6 dwelling units per acre. Required perimeter landscaping is illustrated along the various perimeters of the site. Sight-obscuring screening, required by the UR-22 zone along the perimeter of the site acijacent to UR-3.5 zoning, is not illustrated on the site plan. The projECt would be ser-ved witll public sewer, through an extension in the Main Avenue right of way. B. ProceduralInformation: Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14.402 and 14.622 Hearing Date and Location: January 3, 2001, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA. Site Visits: January 2 and February 19, 2001 Notiees: Mailed: December 18, 2000, by applicant Posted: December 18, 2000, by applicant Published: December 15, 2000) by County ' Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met. Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294 Testimony: Tammy Jones Scott Engelhard Division of Planning Division of Engineering 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 3 , Jerry Storhaug Grant Person . 1322 North Monroe 11219 East Sundown Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane, WA 99206 John Konen John Stock 110 West Cataldo 2335 North Bank Road Spokane, WA 99201 Columbus, OH 43220 Todd Prescott Bill White 8585 Woodvine Drive 176 South Stevens Hayden, ID 83835 Spolcane, WA 99221 Dorothy Ricgel Arthtir Dryver 503 North Conklin 16414 Easi Main Veradale, WA 99037 Veradale, WA 99037 Grant Rice Don Rader 16620 East Valleytivay 2] 9 North Conklin Veradale, WA 99037 Vet-adale, WA 99037 Dolores Eberspeber 211 North Conklin Veradale, WA 99037 Items Noticed: Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, 1996 Update to Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWM.P), County Zoning Code, County Cocie, County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, County Guidelincs for Stornlwater 1'vlanagement, County official zoning maps, and County Arterial Road Plan maps. County Resolution Nos. 99-0261 (revising Road Standards), 97-0874 (revising interim regulations for County ICJGAs), 96-0585 (adopting 1996 Update to CWMP), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure), 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance), and 85-0900 (adopting Zoning Code, and Program to Implement Zoning Code). Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report and in this decision. Procedural Matter: The Examiner left the record open after the public hearing to allow County Engineering to submit additional written coinments on traffic issues, and responses thereto by others. On January 22, 2001, a letter was received from Joseph anci Sophia Wetzler, in response to the letter from County Engineering. The record was closed on January 23, 2001, upon receipt of a letter from Storhaug Engineering, on the applicant's behalf, responding to the letter from County Engineering. III. LA.ND USE ANALYSIS FINDINGS 4F FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. Aupi-oval criteria In considering a rezone application, Washijlgton case law generally provides that 1) there is no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone proposal rnust bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridge v. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 4 • i , . Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462, 573 P.2d 359 (1978); and BjaYnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wn. App. 840, 899 P.2d 1290 (1995). Some Washington cases have dispensed with the changed circumstancES requirement where the rezone specifically implemented the policies of the comprehensive plan. I3jaj'nson v. Kitsap County, supra; Save Our- Rural Enviro»»>ejit v. Snolrornish Courrty, 99 Wn.2ci 363, 370-371 (1983); and TLigwelt v. Kir.rirus Counry, 90 wn. App. 1, S, 951 P.2d 272 (1999). A comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation. Only general conformance with a conlprehensive plan is required for approval of a rezone proposal. Citizei7s for Mouiit Vernon v. City of Mount Ver-non, 133 Wiz. Zd 861, 873 (1997); and Ccrthcaj-t v. Snohomislr CoLtftty, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Where the policies of a comprehensive plan conflict with zoning regulations, the provisions of tlie zoning code will usually be construed to prevail. See Weyerhaeusej- v. Pierce Counry, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); C01.1g'C1Y Mt. ASSOCS. V. Klllg COlli'lly, 111 Wn.2d 742, 755-57 (1988); and Nugutani Bros. v. Cornmissioners, 108 Wn.2d 477, 480 (1987). The County Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Hearing Examiner to grant, deny or grant with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to make a land use application compatible with the Spokane County Gencralized Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment "A", paragraphs 7(d) and section 11. Development regulations include, without limitation, the County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11.10 of Spokane County Code). Section 14.402.020 of the County Zoning Code authorizes amendments to the Code based on any one of six (6) grounds, without differentiating between amendments to the text of the Zoning Code and amendments to the official zoning map. Zoning Code 14.402.020(1) authorizes the Code to be amended if the change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare...". Zoning Code 14.402.020(2) authorizes a Code arnendment where "[c]hanges in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification of this Code...". These are the most relevant criteria for consideration of a site-specific rezone application. Section 14.100.104 of the County Zoning Code states that the provisions of the Code shall be interpreted to carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the general plans for physical development of the county adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Zoning Code 14.100.106 indicates tllat when the provisions of the Zoning Code conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans and development regulatiocls, the more restrictive provisions shall govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code provisions will be met as a minimum. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the decision guidelines stated in the various sections of the Plan should be used as a resource and guide for approving specific land uses. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 5 • , ( I B. The proposed rezone, as conditioned, generally conforms with the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan; bears a substantial relationship to and will not be detnmental to the nublic health, safety and general welfare; and complies witli the Spokane County Zoning Code and other applicable development reaulations. 1. Apnlicable policics of Comprehensive Plan a. Urban categorv The site is designated in the Urban catcgory of the Comprehensive 1'lan. The Urban category is intended to providc the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes various land uses, residential developmenfi and a high level of public facilities and urban services. 1t is primarily a residential categoiy of single-fanlily, two-family, multi-family, and condominium buildings along tvith neighborhood commercial, light induslrial, and public and zecreational facilitics. The Urban category reconImEnds a residential net density range of 1 to 17 units per acre. The more intensive uses in the Urban category, SllCl1 1S llght 1T1dUStZla1 and IlElg}1bOI"1100d commercial, are typically located near or along the lzeavily traveled streets. The least intensive single-family residential uses should be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, whilc multifamily structures will usually be a transitional use located between single-family residential and the more intensive areas. See Coinprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed Definition". The Urban category includes the following relevant policies: Goal .1. 1 Encourage u var•iety of housing types and derisities. Objective l.l.a Promote fill-in within established development areus and existing outlying commuriities wheYe utilities, arterials, sclzools and community facilities have already been established. Decision Guideline 1.1.1 Urbarr development will be approvetl in ureas having adequate power supplies, water, sunitury and storm sewers, streets, and school and fere sertiices, provided that such development meets the intent of other Objectives and Decision Guidelines of this section. Ohjective 1.1. b Higher-clensity developments suelz as ni ulti fa,nily uncl mobile homes (manufactured homes) purks shoulcl be locuted with direct or n.ear access to the major- urterial systems rather lhan on interior neighborhood streets. Access to pubic trartsportatiort sliould also he corrsidered. Objective l.l.c When multifumily dwelli,igs are to be located udjucent to single fumily areas, careful cofisideration must be given to the density uitd designs of the multiple family developtnent so us to ensure protection of the umenities of the sirigle family area. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision , ZE-20-00 Page 6 Decisioii Guideline 1.1.3 A multifumily dwellitrg structure exceeding thj-ee (3) residential units oY a developriient of such structures or• manufactzcred homes (except those on single fumily lors) shoulcl: a) locate adjacent to designated arterials; b) IOCQt2 i22ClY 2XISllllg Of' plQP111eCI J7LlbIIC tyansit routes; c) impYOVe oY maintain the consistency of a4jacef7t single family artrertities. Decision Guideline 1.1.4 A variety of clensities and r-esidential uses should be available to provicle a fr-eedoni of choice to live in Uj-bccn areas with varyirig densities, conzbifrutiotis, ojr rnix of trses (s2e cletailecl Urban clefrnc.'tions). Decisroii Guideline 1.3.3 All UYban developmertt proposals sl2ot.clcl yequire public sanitary urrd stornz seiver systems oy- interirrt sewer systems to pr•otect ivuter yuulity. Goul .1.5 Encourage a healthful and pleasirzg efrvirorirrierit in the Courity's residentiul ureas. Objective I.S.a New residential or multiple family should be buffered fYOm existing adjacent lund uses where udverse effects nzuy develop. Decision Guideline 1.5.1 13uffer-ing and/or lccndscaping will be used to mitigate the differences between proposed developinents uncl existing uses. Decision Guideline 1.5.2 L«iidscccping m(iy be i-equired t.o provide a healthful and pleasing resiclential eyrvironmeiit. Objective I.S.f Consider the profile, especially height, of the existing neighhorhood when evuluuting multifamily developnzents. Objective 1.5.8 When cleternzining whetlier a proposal will chunge the existing land use cl:aructer of an area, factors to corisider may include: a) the structure height of the proposal in relation to structure height of nearby structures, and b) whether new structures will huve a positive or negative impact upon the neighborhood 's architectural charucter. Decision Guideline 1.6.1 Before lund use proposals are approved they should: a) confornz to plans, policies ancl regulations of County water, sewer, storm sewer, utility and special service districts; b) conform to County transportution plaizs and policies; arid c) identify and take steps to resolve significant adverse impacts upon existing utilities, (i.e. ivater, sanitary and storni sewers, utility, availuble uncl future energy resources), and traffic systeins b. Urban Impact Area The proposal is located in the Urban Inlpact A.rea (UIA) designated by the Comprehensive Plan, an area where growth, development and higher intensities of land use are encouraged. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.a. Objective 14.1.b states that "fill-in development", public HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 7 utilities, and public services within the UXA should be encouraged, where consistent with tlle policies of applicable land use categories. "Fill-in development" is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as development lying between and in close proximity to at least 2 existing developed geographic areas, having densities and land uses whicli conform to the Comprehensive Plan Map categories designated for those areas, and w11ich would aid in the economic support of public servicc by increasing the cost- effectiveness of utilities and public facilities and services. Comprehensive Plan, Glossary. Traditional urban problems such as incompatible land uses, environ.inental pollution and traffic congcstion are to be managed with greater attention to the general public's well being insidc the UTA. Compl-ehensive plan, Objective 14.1.e. The UTA section of the Comprehensive Plan contains no decision guidelines. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 14. c. "Tiansition area" policy The site is located adjacent to and north of the Major Commercial category designated by the Comprehensive 1'lan, which category is divided by Main Avenue extended. Because the site lies adjacent to land designatcd in the Major Commercial category, the "transition area" guidelines discussed in the Comprehensive Plan may apply to the proposal. The introduction to the Comprehensive Plan contains the following statenient, under the heading "Guidelines for Monitoi-ing and Amending the Plan": Trunsition Area The area along the boicridary between hvo or rnore lancl- use categoi•ies is the "transitiorr ar-ea It is the intent thut the estahlished boundaries between land use cutegor-ies are accurate and clefl'nahle on the ground, but it is also recognized that a specic proposal may cross or be adjacent to these boundaYies and be situuted in a"tf'ansitiorz area In these instayices, depenclirig on the impacts to existing luNd use categories and the distance a use intrudes into on ucljacerzt category, un amendment may f2ot be required. In those cases where the deterinination is that the pYOposal is not in the transition area, a Compreherrsive Plan amendrnent may be necessary. See Comprehensive Plan, p. 11. The Comprehensive Plan glossary also coiitains the following relevant definitions: Trunsitiorral areas-The fi^inge areas bet.tiveen two or more C'on7prehensive Plun land use categories. This is un area which cajT allow developments corrzplying with either of the Luj7d-Use irtap Cutegories clepenclent upon the clecisiori niakers ' site-specific approvul. f Transitionnl buffeYing-Buffering techfliques which might be required on the periphery of two or more CompYehensive Plan lurad use categories to ensure compatibility. Such techniques might include increasirag the lot sizes on the perimeter• of a development which abuts another land use category to create open space hetween two poterrtially incompatible uses. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 8 "Buffering" is defined by the Comprehensive Plan glossary as a"...technique of separating incompatible land uses by distance, changing density, landscaping, screening and/or physical features or structures". "Compatibility" means [when] two different land uses exist adjacent to one another in such proximity to one another that adverse impacts are insignificant". "Mitigation" means strategies such as avoiding impacts by not taking a certaitl action or parts thereof; minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action, through techrlology or other affirniative steps; rectifying impacts b}j restoring or repairing environmentally sensitive areas; reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation or maintenance operations during the life of the development; compensating for the impact by replacing or enhancing substitute envirorvnentally sensitive areas; aild monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 50 d. Maior Commercial catei4orv The Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunifiy for development of commercial uses, "...spccifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses, directly related to major throughways". Comprehensive Plan, Major Commercial category, p. 99. The Major Cominercial category includes the following relevant descriptions, characteristics and policies: Residential use in Major- Commereial areas is not intenclecl to be a high priority in this cutegory urrcl niay be Izmited to preexistr'izg uses. Certairr residential uses, particularly multifamily developments, may be compatible throug{i the use of proper screening and performance staridards. The Major Commercial Category will be composed of three differ-ent types of commercial development: shopping centers, highway and arterial commercial strips, and freeway commercial. Major Commercial areas feature high-interisity uses. The heuvy autorrcobile traffic and the related congestion may create pollution prohlems, especiully along the commercial strip developments. Most conimercial developnzent will be on relatively flat larid and buildirtgs will be of a low profile. Paved parking, streets and man-made structures will dominate tlle site, witli few riatural features to be found. Landscaping, screening, lighting, signage and other architectural treatment will provide for aesthetically pleasiiig development. 1'leasing aesthetic and architectural treatment of new developnzent which eliminates or is gerrerally not chui-acterized by signage clutter, provicles maintuined landscuping, scj-eens exterior storage, provides sufficient setbucks and screens parking areas, should foster improved land use computibility with adjacent non-commercial uses and should suppor•t existing and attr-act new viable commercial development. HE Findinas, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 9 . • Major Commerciul areas require a fiill line of services ayid utilities. These ifzclicde service by, or comrriitme»t to, sunitajy and slorrn sewers, public lvater systems and undergrouncl utilities sucli us telephone, gas and electricity. Also availuble will be paved urid lighted streets, pCZYICtl1g lOIS, street nzaintejzafice, garbage collection andpolice arid fiy-e pj-otectioit. In most cnses interrsive farniirtg acfivities, 171111111g Q12d h2ClVy lj1CIuSt1'•iul aises woulcl be incompatible with Majoj' Commer•cial uses. Likewise, fnost sirrgle-fainily resitlerrtial ar-eas and sclrools woulcl nol be compatihle within the MajoY Commer•cial Category unless proper screenii7g ajid perforn7ance standaYds af-e established. Goal 6.1: Prornote developntent of comntercial lalzd in a murrrrer wliich is coiriplementayy ajul corripatible lvith adjucent lcuid 74ses afid the surroundirig environmeiit. OUjective 6.l.cc: Comrnercial developm errts should be buffeiled to protect ucljucent ureas. Objective 6.1. b: Provide for aesthetics of cleveloplnent uloflg County Artei-iuls and State Highways or Freewuys. Decision Guideline 6.1.1: The best ineuns of encour•agirtg compatibility between commerciril uses and adjclcent lunrl arse cutegories will be uccomplished by considering: a) orieritation of the strr.cctures ancl/or facilities of the proposal to maintairi or improve upon the aestltetics and energy efficiency of all . areas affected by the proposal; and b) provision of buffering needs; and c) provision of landscaping rieeds. Decision Guideline 6.1.2: Buffering or spatial separation betiveen . proposed and existing uses should be required of a developer if deternzined that the proposed developmetzt's physical characteristics may be objectionable to future development on neay-by lurt(ls. Decision Guideline 6.1.8: Appropriately buffered inultifamily resideritial development coinpatible with existing and potential commercial activities • may be nermitted as transitiori between higli-intef7sity uses (for example, commercial uses) and low-intensity uses (for exarnple, single family uses), especially when the commercial tlcti>>ities can pYOVide or share wuste energy. Ohjective 6.1 j: Consider smull-scale conven ience stores and commercial ei-rterprises adjacent to residential neighhorhoods. Decision Guideline 61.13: Stores and commer-cial services estUblished to serve residents within u few blocks' radius mtry be cottsidered computible, and therefore appropriate, when they are adjacent to residential land-use ccctegories. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 10 Decisiort Guicleline 6.1.14: Maifltenunce of any small-totivn ta,r base aiid . economic vitcclity should be a high priority when making u lartd use decisiorr. e. Transportation section The Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan contains the Arterial Road Plan (ARP) and policies related to the development of and along county roads. The A.R.P describes and designates county arterials into the classes of Principal, Minor and Collector Arterials. All other county roacis are considered Local Access roads. See Comprehensive Plan, Sectiori 21. The ARP indicates that it is to be impletnented through adopted arterial road plan maps, adopted road standards, and the County's Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Coiiipreheilsive Plan, p. 261. The ARP characterizes a typical Principal A.rterial as a 4 or more lane (including turning lane), moderatEly fast facility designed to permit relatively unimpeded traffic flow between major traffic generators, such as the central business district, major shopping centers, major employment districts, etc. Principal Arterials are considered the framework road system for the urbanized portion of the county, and are fio be located on community and neighborhood boundaries. Valley Way Avenue adjacent to the site is designated as a Collector A.rterial. The ARP characterizes Collector Arterials as relatively low-speed, 2-lane facilities desigiled to provide greater access to adjacent property, rather than providing mobility. The function of a Collector Arterial is to collect and distribute traffic from Principal and Minor Arterials to Local Access roads, or directly to traffic destinations, to serve neighborhood traffic generators such as a small group of stores, elementary schools, church, small apartment areas, neighborhood parks, etc. Sidewalks are generally used to provide a means for children to walk to school, if located in the neighborhood, or to bus routes located on Minor Arterials, along neighborhood boundaries. The Transportation section encourages an adequate, efficient, safe, economical and energy- conserving arterial system; one which provides convenient access to homes, employment, shopping, personal business and recreation. Decision Guideline 21.4.2. Decision Guidelines 21.4.5 and 21.5.7 of the Transportation section recommend that the function of existing and future arterials be preserved by controlling land uses, parking and direct access along the arterials. Decision Guideline 21.5.3 encourages land use planning that minimizes the need for high capacity transportation corridors, and encourages land uses in areas that can take advantage of the available capacity of existing arterial streets. Decision Guideline 21.5.11 recommencis the development of pedestrian facilities that enhance the safety and convenience of pedestrian travel and to provide access to neighborhood facilities. Decision Guideline 21.1.5 states that sidewalks should at a minimum be provided along all arterial roads and all local access roads which lead to schools, parks and shopping districts. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 11 The Arterial Road Plan in the Transportation sectiion recommends the early acquisition of the prescribed right of width for Principal Arterials, though actual road construction within such right of way may be accomplished in phases over time. Comprehensive Plan, p. 253. Decision Guideline 21.1.3 stiates tliat the review of land use proposals should contain provisions for• extensions, alignments and adequate right of way acquisition for designated County Arterials. Objective 21.1.6 recommends that long-range widening requirements be considered in developments adjacent to arterials and anticipated arterials, to allow for increased traffic volumes caused by futurE developments. Decision Guideline 21.1.13 states that in selecting long-range arterial improvements, consideration should be given to long-range improvements at significant locations, where such improvements will delay or eliininate future higti cost reconstniction. Tlle Transportation section recom_mends that proposed development be required to dedicate needed right of way, or to widen, or assist in widening, existing transportation facilities; all in accordance with established road design criteria and official Inaps. Decision Guideline 21.1.7. The primary function of Local Access roads is to provide access to adjacent property and dcliver traffic to arterials. Such roads are to be designeci and located to providE convenient access to residential lots, discourage flows of traffic tlirough a neighborhood, and encourage continuous or unobstructed flow of traff c fronl a neighborhood to a neighborhood Collector Arterial. Comprehensive Plan, p. 247 and 260; and Decision Guideline 21.3.3. Decision Guideline 21.5.10 discourages "through" traffic from using residential access streets, and encourages making residential neighborhoods more attractive to family residents. The alignment and trafi'ic control of such roads should encourage a slow, safe speed. This may be accomplished by utilizing physical and traffic management techniques such as offset intersections, circle drives, curvilinear street design and cul-de-sacs. f. Wastewater Mana.izement policies Decision Guideline 23.1.2 of the Comprehensive Plan recorrunends that sewer facility planning and development be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in regard to size, location and timing. Decision Guideline 23.1.3 indicates that capital improvement plans for sewer facilities should be used as an implementation tool for the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The more restrictive of the policies in the CWMP and Comprehensive Plan are to be applied by public agencies using sucll policies. See County Resolution No. 96-0585. In 1996, the County aciopted an update to the County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (1996 CWMP Update). The CWMP is incorporated by reference into the Comprehensive Land Use Plan adopted by the County. The 1996 CWIvTP Update designates 6- year and 15-year capital improvement areas where the County plans to extend public sewer service. See County Resolution No. 96-0585, adopting CWMP 1996 Update, p. 2-8, 2-10 and Exhibit 4-2. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 12 i ' 2. Consistencv of probosal with rezone criteria Tlie applicant proposes to rezone the site from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to tlie Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, a zone that is specifically intended to implement the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Code 14.622.100 sets forth the purpose and intent of the UR-22 zone, as follows: 7'he purpose of the UR-22 zo«e is to set standurds foj- the orclef-ly development of yesidenticcl property in a manner that provides udesirable living envir•onment that is compatible with surrouf-rding lcrrrd uses and assur-es the protection of property vcllues. It is intended thut this zone be usecl to add to the variety of housifag types ancl derisities, and as an implementution tool for the ComtpYChensive Plan Urburi Cutegor-y. Cejler-ul char-ucteristics of these ureas inclucle pavecl roads, pacblic sewer and water-, uccessibility to schools and libraries, arrd a firll lirie ofpublic services irrcluding manned fire protection undpublic transit accessibility. Offices ure permitted in the UR-22 zone iji oi-der to provide solne of the ser-vice needs generated by lzigh-intensity land uses. The hi'ahest densitv Yesidential zone, UR-22 is intended nrimarilv for multinle-farrrilv dwellines urrd is usuullv located adiacent to muior of- secondarv arterials. It is used as u transition between low or• medium derrsitv multinle-familv uses and intensive commercial or• low intensitv industrial uses and to provicle for hizher densitv housin,a in locations close to enzplovment, shoDDinz and malor transnortation where rnovements ofpeople can be hartdled effrcientlv and with least overull adverse i»znuct. [emphasis added] Medical, business and professional offices are a permitted use in the UR-22 zone. Multi- family dwellings, duplexes and single-family uses are amoilg the residential uses permitted outright in such zone, at densities (net) not exceeding 22 units per acre. Bonus densities above 22 dwelling units per acre may be approved for multi-family projects that are directly connected to public sewer, depending on land use impacts. Multi-family dwellings include the use of retirement/elderly apartments. Hospitals, day care centers, nursing homes/convalescent homes, and community residential facilities are among the other uses permitted in such zone. The maximum building height in the UR-22 zone is 50 feet, and the maximum building coverage is 65%. See Zoning Code chapter 14.605. The project has been revised at least 3 times since the time of initial application. The . applicant first proposed the development of 195 dwelling units on an enlarged site of 9.01 acres, including 75 units of 2-story senior housing, and 120 units of 2.5-story general multi-family housing, at a residential density of 21.6 dwelling units per acre. In November, 2000, the project was revised to provide for the development of 172 multi-family dwelling units on the current site, in the form of 75 units of 2-story senior housing, and 95 units of 2.5-story general multi- family housing, at a residential density of 21.5 dwelling units per acre. At the public hearing held on January 3, 2001, the project was revised to provide for the development of 125 multi- family dwelling units, in the form of 50 units of single-story senior housing and 75 units of 2.5- story general multi-family housing, at a density of 16.5 dwelling units per acre. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 13 The project will be ser-ved by a high level of public services, including public, sewer and water, and modern utilities. The site lies inside the Public Transit Benefit Area, the area wllere the Spokane Transit Authority is authorized to provide public transit services. See Zoning Code 14.300.100. Public transit is available in Sprague Avenue aiid Sullivan Road, which are both located within reasonable walking distance of the site. tn 1997, the site was designated inside the interim urban growth area (IUGA) boundaries adopted by the County pursuant to the State Growth Managcment Act (GMA). Morc intensive urban developmcnt is encouraged within the IUGA. The current site is located outside both the 6-year and 15-year sewer program areas. However, the applicant plans to extend public sewer from the southeast to serve the project. The extension of public sewer allows the project to comply with County Resolution No. 97-0864, which pi-ohibits the rezoning of land located within the County's IUGA boundaries, but 1ying outside the 15-year sewer program area, unless public sewer is available. The project represents "fill-in development", since it is located bet-vveen developcd areas to the north and south that have deiISities and land uses which conform to the Urban and Majol- Commercial categories respectively designated for those areas, and approval of the project would aid in the economic support of public service, by increasing the cost-effectiveness of utilities and public facilities and services. Fill-iTi development is encouraged in t11e Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The site generally meets the location criteria foi- multi-family development recommended by the Urban category, and in the purpose and intent statement for the UR-22 zone. The site is located along a designated arterial, and is reasonably close to public transit, employment and shopping. The UR-22 zone prefers, but does not require, the location of higll-density multi- family uses along a Principal or Minor Arterial. An Urban Residential-12 (LTR-12) zone might be the most optimal zone for tlle project under the Comprehensive Plan. See Zoning Code 14.620.100. However, the location of the proposed rezone conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, considering the relatively low density of the project for the UR-22 zone, at approximately 15.6 dwelling units per acre, the provision of less intensive senior housing in the project, and the proximity of the site to the business districts located along Sprague Avenue, Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue. Senior housing typically generates less traffic and land use impacts than general multi-family housing, due to the older age of the residents. As revised, the project provides transition from the intensive commercial uses and zoning abutting the site on the south and the single-family residEntial uses and vacant land lying near or adjacent to the site, zoned UR-3.5 or UR-7. Such transition is encouraged by both the Major Commercial category and the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The easterly portion of the project would be improved with a higher density of housing than the westerly portion, in the form of general multi-family housing, in 2.5 stories with a maxiinum height of 38 feet. The land lying directly east of the multi-family buildings represents the vacant portion of a strip of land improved with a single-family home along Valley Way, zoned UR-3.5. The nearest multi-family building in the east portion of the project is set back over 200 feet from Valley Way Avenue, and would be approximately 200 feet southwest of the single-family residence located on the adjacent property to the east. The proposed height of the HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 14 • . " multi-family buildings in the easterly portion of the project is well below the maximum allowable building height of 50 feet in the UR-22 zone, and is near the maximum building height allowable in the UR-3.5 zone of 35 feet. The westerly portion of the project would be improved with a lower density of housing, contain senior housing and single-story buildings of low prof le. A strip of vacant land zoned UR-3.5, approximately 160 feet wide, is located directly west of the site. The l.l-acre rectangular area located between the site and Valley Way Avenue contains 2 single-family homes. The owners of such residences do not oppose the project. The land located south of the site consists of the unimproved right of way for Main Avenue. The land lying beriveen such right of way and Sprague Avenue includes a UR-22 zone improved with an apartment complex, and Regional Business (B-3) zones improved with intensive coinmercial uses. A large Community Business (B-2) zone, improved with a large Fred Meyers store, is located approxilnately 250 feet southwest of the site. The above discussion indicates that the project is reasonably well buffered by distance from existing single-family homes in the area. Required landscaping and screening will provide further buffering effects. IJnder the UR-22 zone, the applicant is required to install 5 feet of Type 1 landscaping and a 6-foot high sight-obscuring screen (masonry wall, fence or solid landscaping) along the east arld west borders of the site adjacent to UR-3.5 zoning. The site plan of record shows the required perirneter larldscaping, but not the sight-obscuring screen. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that this requirement is met. The project also illustrates 20 feet of Type III landscaping along the frontage of the site with Valley Way and the IV1ain Avenue right of way, as required by the UR.-22 zone. The proposed building coveragc on the project site is approximately 21%, which is less than a third the maximum building coverage of 60% allowed in the UR-22 zone. On October 6, 2000, after the project was revised to provide for the development of 172 multi-family dwelling units, notice of the application was provided to all owners of property located within 400 feet of the site. Only 2 owners of property responded to the notice of application. One such owner (Wetzlers) resides on Moore Road northwest of the site, and the other (Margaris) lives along the south side of Valley Way, directly east of the site. Such letters raised concerns over cumulative traffic impacts from such project, in conjunction with other new development proposed or approved in the area, the potential use of Moore Road for access to Broadway Avenue to the north, the inadequacy of Valley Way Avenue for the project, an excessive amount of multi-family development in the Valley area of the county, increased traffic congestion in the area, impacts on property values, increased crime, impacts on local schools, and other concerns. A subsequent letter was received from the Wetzlers on December 26, 2000, before the final revision to the project. Such letter expressed coilcern that traffic from the project would use Moore Road to reach Broadway and shopping opportunities along such road, especially after the installation of a traffic light at Sprague and Conklin Road, concerns over sidewalks not being available for senior citizens, impacts on student and school bus transportation, and lack of planning by the county. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 15 At the public hearing held on January 3, 2001, a letYer was submitted by Del and Jeannette Liljegren in opposition to the project. The lctter states that such owners were not notified regarding the hearing. However, the Affidavit of Mailing submitted by the applicant on December 18, 2000 indicates that all owners of property located within 400 feet of the site were given mailed notice of hearing, including the Liljegrens. The Liljegrens reside northwest of the site, along the east sidc of Moore Road. The Liljegrens' letter enclosed copies of foim lctters to the Heai-ing Examiner dated August 26, 2000, signed by numerous area residents. The fonn letters objected to an unrelatEd application for a rezone to the UR-22 zone, for development of offices, for a site located some distance north of the site along the south side of Broadway Avenue, between Moore Road and Conklin Road. The Hearing Examiner approved such rezone on October 30, 2000, in Planning File No. ZE-13-00. The form letters submitted for File No. ZE-13-00 stated tilat a zone changc to the UR-22 would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, that UR-22 zoning would set a precedent to rezone all surrounding land to UR-22, and that such rezones would devalue property in the area; and further expressed concerns over increased traff c flow, increased load on fire and protection resources, and the absence of public sewer. At the public hearing, 5 residents in the riearby area testified in opposition to the project. This included 3 residents along Conklin Road to the east and northeast, and additional residents along Valley Way Avenue or Main Avenue east of Conklin Road. Such i-esidents expressed concern that the rezone would set a precedent for other high-density projects in the vicinity, that the senior housing in the project should be placed along tlze east side of the project instead of the west side, excessive density, inadequzte buffering for adjoining single-falnily llomes, concerns over the introduction of low income housing in the area, inadequate fire access, potential access onto Main Avenue, the need for a traff c signal at Sprague AvEnue and Conklin Road, and other concerns. The letter dated January 2, 2001 from the Liljegrens contended that Valley Way Avenue was an insufficient arterial road for multi-family ciwellings, and expressed concerns with the lack of sidewalks and the presence of narrow streets along county roads leading to Valley Way and Sprague Avenue, the lack of bus service for children walking to Central Valley High School, the lack of planning by the County for area developYnent, excessive building heights in the project, the lack of public transit along Valley Way, inconsistency of the project with the Comprehensive Plan, and other concerns. The project will increase traffic along Valley Way Avenue, and Conklin Road. However, there is no showing that the project will result in a failing level of service at area intersections, or along other portions of the trafftc infrastructure in the area, at the time of its projected build-out in 2005. The traffic analysis for the project indicates that the level of service at the un-signalized intersection of Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue, as a result of traffic impacts from the project and other background projects will be at Level of Service (LOS) D. LOS D is an acceptable level of service for an un-signalized intersection. See 1999 Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, page 10. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 16 Projects in the area approved for developer Buster Heitman, located to the southeast along Sprague Avenue, and further to the south, are expected to eventually degrade the intersection of Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue to a failing level, in conjunction with other approved developments. The Heitman projects have or will contribute a significant amount of traffic to the intersection compared to the current project. Developer Heitman is required to install a traffic signal at the subject intersection at the time signal warrants are met. When installed, this will greatly improve the level of service at such intcrscction. Cowlty Engineering's letter dated January 11, 2001, recommends that the applicant be required to contribute a pro-rata share of the installation of a traffic signal at the subject intersection, at the time signal warrants are met arld a signal is required to be installed at the intersectiion. Tlle applicant is willing to mak-c such contribution. See letter dated 1-18-01 from Storhaug Engineering. Opponeiits of the project subniitted no competent evidence of a traffic engineering nature that would support requiring the applicant to pay a larger pcrccntage of ihe cost of the signal, or provide additional traffic mitigation in the area; or that would support a finding that cumulative traffic impacts were not sufficiently considered by the applicant's traffic engineer or County Engineering. This includes alleged impacts along Moore Road, and at the intersection of Moore Road and Broadway Avenue. See testimony of Bill VVhite. It is noted that the applicant is required to contribute funds for a new loop ramp to be installed in 2001 at the I-90/Sullivan Road interchange. County Engineering conditions require the applicant to widen and improve Valley Way Avenue along the frontage of the development to a Collector Arterial roadway section, including the installation of curb and sidewalk. The applicant is also required to dedicate 2.5 feet of right of way along such frontage, and to reserve an additional 12.5 feet for future right of way acquisition. With the extension of public sewer to the area, and increased commercial development along Sprague Avenue to the south and Sullivan Road to the west, it is logical to assume that the land along Valley Way Avenue in tlle vicinity, between Conklin Road and Sullivan Road, will continue to be developed at higher intensities. This will logically lead to the further extension of arterial improvements, including widening and the installation of curb and sidewalk, along such arterial. This has already occurred for the commercial development located along Valley Way, near Sullivan Road. The project does not intend to rely on Main Avenue for access, except for gated emergency access. County Engineering conditions prohibit clirect access to Main Avenue until authorized by County Engineering. If access were allowed, the applicant.would be required to improve Main Avenue to County standards, between the site and Conklin Road. Spokane County Fire District 1 commented tllat fire hydrant and fire apparatus access requirements for the project would need to be addressed at the time of application for a building permits, but submitted no other corrunents regarding the proposed rezone. See letter dated 7-17-00 from Kevin Miller to Tammy Jones. Van or mini-bus transportation is a common feature of senior housing. The record indicates that only some high school students will be walking to school on area streets, with elementary and middle school children being bussed. Many high school students currently drive or ride to school in personal vehicles. The Examiner does not view traffic generation from the HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 17 project as presenting a significant safety hazard for those high school students who.may walk to Central Valley High School, located a few blocks south of Sprague Avenue in the arEa. While some residents expressed concern that the project would introduce low income housing into the neighborhood, testimony from t11e applicant convinces the Examiner that both the general multi-family portion of the project and the senior housing in the project will be well- designed and well-managed, and will not have a signif cant impact on single-family amenities and property values in the area. The applicant indicated at the public hearing fihat the density of the general multi-family portion of the project might be reduced significantly, although this remains to be seen. See testimony of. John Stock and Todd Prescott. The Examiner has limited the number and types of units in the project, as proposed at the public hearing. The Examiner has considered the views of neighboring property owners, which may be given substantial weight, but are not in and of themsclves controlling, under Washington case law. Such views arc not sufficient to justiFy denial of the proposcd rezone. No deficiencies with regard to the ability of the project to comply with development regulations have been established in the record. The project has been conditioned for compliance with the development standards of the UR.-22 zone and other applicable provisions of the County Zoning Code, and the recommendations of the commenting public agencies. As conditioned, the project will be reasonably compatible with, and noC have a significant negative impact on, neighboring land uses. The project, as conditioned, genel-ally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the proposal by the County Division of Plailning. The proposal will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the envirolunent, and the Examiner concurs with issuance of the DNS. The procedural requirements of chaptcr 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code have been met. 3. Conditions in the area have substantiallv changed since the site was last zoned to iustifv the proposed rezone, as conditioned. In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors, including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal, and changes on the property itself. The Zoning Code references changes in "economic, technological or land use conditions" as factors that will support a rezone. Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.402.020 (2). Washington courts have not required a"strong" ShOWlI1g of change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. County Commissiorters, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993). As stated previously, recent Washington cases have held that changed circumstances are not required if the proposed rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan. The Examiner concluded above that the property implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 18 , Changed conditions have occurred since the zoning of the site was re-designated to the UR-3.5 zone on January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Prograin to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. This includes the availability of public sewer to the subject property, road improvements to Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue in the area, the rezoning and development of land along Sprague Avenue, Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue in the area for intensive commercial development, increased population growth in the area, and designation of the site within the County's IUGA boundaries. See recent land use actions referenced on page 2 of Staf.f Report. IV. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a rezone to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is hereby aprroved, subject to the conditions of approval of public agencies stated below. Any conditions of such agencies that have been added or significantly revised by the Hearing Examiner are italicized. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to comply with all other requirenlents of other agencies with jurisdicfiion. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on tl2e "Applicant, " which term shall inclutle the owner (s) and developer (s) of the property, ancl their heirs, ussigns and successors. 2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, and other applicable sections of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 3. The applicant shall develop the subject property in substantial ccccordance witli the site plan of recoYd dated January 3, 2001, and the concept presented to the I-Iearing Examiner, subject to compliance with conditions of approval and clevelopmerit regulations. Minor variations, consistent with coriditions of approval and development standards, may be permitted administratively by the County Division of Planning in accordance with Section 14.504. 040 of the County Zoning Code. All otlier revisioris rnust be approved by the Heuring Exumrner, pursuant to a public heaYing on a change of conditions applicatiort. 4. The number of dwelling units in the project shall not exceed SO u»its of senror housing und 75 units of general rrtulti fanzily housing. 5. Sight-obscuring screening shall be irastalled along the interior borders of the site, as required by Section 14.622.365 of the County Zoning Code, as amended. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 19 6. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Plaruiing/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property, prior to the release of any building pernzit. 7. Direct light from any exterior area li-ahting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 8. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for tlze maintenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of PlaiIning shall be submitted with a perrormance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any builciing pennits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained as required in Chapter 14.806 a»d Section 14.802.220 of the County Zoning Code, as amended. 9. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice spccifying a future land acquisition area for road right of way and utilities. The Title Notice shall state the following: a. A strip of property 12.5 feet in width, in addition to the 2.5 Feet requircd to bc dedicafied for Valley Way Avenue, shall be resel-ved for a future acquisitiou area, for additional road right of way width along Valleyway Avenue. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right of way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are within the area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfielci, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements, after acquiring said future acquisition area. 9. The Division of Planning shall prepare and recorci with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice, noting that the property is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of the approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same tiine frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: "The parcel of property legally described as [see file] is the subject of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on February 210, 2001, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-20-00 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning." HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 20 ' r ^ , • . . SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT 1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage, in order to be infornled of code requirements administered or enforced under the State Building Code Act. Designldevelopment concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and erlergy code requirements. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AI\TD ROADS Prior to issuance of a building permit, or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whiciiever comes first: 1. The applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for right of way. Prior to release of a building permit or use of propei•ty as proposed: 2. A traffic study has been accepted by the County Engineer for this proposal and is valid until December 31, 2005. Should there be subsfiantial changes in tlle sife design or not completed by December 31, 2005, the County Engineer may require updated traffic information to be submitted and additional mitigation may be required. 3. Access permits for approaches to the County Road Systcin s11a11 be obtained fi-om tlie County Engineer. 4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Va]leyway Avenue which is adjacent to tihe proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk lnust also be consfil-ucted. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 21 ' . 8. Direct access to Main Avenue is prohibited until authorized by the County Eugineer. The applicant is advised tlzat any access to Main Avenue shall require frontage improvements to Main Avenue constructed to a Local Access Roadway Standard. Frontage improvements along Main Avenue would require 32 feet of asphalt and the installafion of curbing and sidewalk. T11e improvements to Vlain Avenue would also require off-site strip paving to the intersection of Main Avenue and Conklin Road. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the cui-rerlt State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and $ridge constr-uction and other applicable couulty standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stonnwatcr Management in effect at the date of constniction, unless othei-wise approved by thc County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane County Resolution I\TO. 99-0265, as atneiided, and are applicable to this proposal. 11. No construction tivork is to be pErFormed within the existing or pi-oposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12. All required construction within the existiing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit, or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or iinprovements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way Avenue as a 70-foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valley Way Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valley Way Avenue. 14. T11e applicant is advised that there may exist utilities eitller underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spoka.ne County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 15. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for any portion of the property, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Spokane County Engineer for off- site mitigation to the Sullivan Loop Ramp, which this proposal impacts. Estimated construction date of the SuUivan Loop Ramp is spring of 2001. 16. The applicant shall execute "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6", which specifies the following: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 22 . . . ' . • . in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (R.ID) and to support the foniiation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) dcscribed below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the fonnation of a Road lmprovement District pui-suant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.0307 and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being fonned under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. If a RID is proposed for improvemcnt of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s)fiirther agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RrD by the pi-operty included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the R1D, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the righfi, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution metllod under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the f nal assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary fToin assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the properfiy. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at sucll time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvenzents without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Main Avenue." 17. The County Engineer has designated aLocal Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Main Avenue adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk nlust also be constructed. 18. Prior to the release of a building permit, the applicant shall contribute a pro-rata share for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. The traffic signal shall be installed when signal warrants are met per the IVlarnial of Uniform Traffic control Devices (MUTCD). The estimated share of this cost is $3,600.00 and shall be paid to thc County Engineer. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 23 . . , SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DtSTRICT 1. Tl1e sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordiilated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water senlice shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. A public sewrer system shall be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to tlle lot. The use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 5. The use of private wells and water systerns is prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF U1'ILITIES 1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the arca-wide public sewer system shall be constructed. A sewer connection pernlit is required. Colnmercial devclopments shall submit historical and/or estiinated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection pernlit in order to establish sewer fees. 2. The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit historical and/or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal. 3. Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit. 4. Arrangements for payinent of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include con.nection charges and general facilities charges. Charges may be substantial, depending on the nature of the development. 5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. SPOKANE COUNTY ATR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All applicable air pollution regulations must be met. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 1. The applicant shall address fire hydrant and fire apparatus access at the time application is made for a building permit. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 24 . , r DATED this 21 st day of February, 2001 SPOKANF COUNTY HEAR_ING EXAMINER Micliael C. Dempsey, WSBA #823~ NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTTCE OF RIGHT TO APP.EAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA detennination is final and conclusive unless witliin ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision f les an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9) indicates t11at administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be fled with the board of county commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the decision. This decision was inailed by certified mail to the Applicant, and to other parties of record by regular mail, on I'ebruary 21, 2001. Depending on which appeal period referenced above legally applies, aud counting to the next business day when the last day for appeal falls on a holiday or weekend, THE APPEEIL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER MA12CH 5, 2001 or MARCH 7. 2001. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Tlurd Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file inay be inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-00 Page 25 ~r~OrO V ~ !r 1 ~ 41o1dwin ,~,u,~~,au'~ i t lq~. 1, ~1 ~t ~ ~ i 1' w~a•~ 1 1~~~~~~}•~h j1~~w 4i1~•I•.rlll.iS~~~.~};( II...Alll~ 1..I.11t11. ~ n . ~ 1 ~ ~1d IN vp ~ 1.9 ~ r~ Rtn~cb`~ ~ ~ ' 4 .1/~rsi~tin 1 ~ ~ Ait.i ~ S{,~ ""~-^4V ` g 0 co s l~w S~y"' ~ 4 }nl ~ ~~~~15itL• YI~rJPVt' ~ ~ j,~~,~u~~ , . 'rih » • ~,t 1t~~~ 0't'1~,~'~1111111' I ` 1 Yf111 ~`(t~tlYllllllt / 1~~1 11 J11~~ t Q A 7v 1al cG ~ ~ 4 ' ~ ~ Z 4tA 9^ ' Co " 2.4 ~ sy L--- ~ o C) co E _ , - - ~ - 3 -LIj,hp', t~d E s~ + 009100 - , • ~ tn~ ..15A~ ~ Sca~e I ai ~ q oi .,F`~;~~,: ~n y~r,•~ • ~:•R.~~,,` R,y 1,4. ~ W~ ~'te~ti•.t_i'~~.~~F ~ ia': ~'S~,i~w' 04 y' y~ , , V ~,IN ~ . °q ~,~v ~P~','~, . ` ~,~~,~,~'!'~;,~'~}`,y~'? ~ J ~V{ S ~•a.~;'Y' : 7.7,M,~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ , . , M ,L~ ~ y~4`ir"' ~i'"'f - '~~~*l "t . _ 1 . ' '';,Z`''~ yh!:.~ ~ ~!~N0.,t7q, .L ~ 1 ~ tb~,'~ ~Y x,'~w~~,:' ~„q~'';~'~~;;;•`*r~~• .;y~' ,~..i"' ~`r~ ' ~ `x s~1~'~•tk~~,~Y%~` . ,~y,, ~ ~ ~ ` ti 1~~ t'+ ~,~,"„y,y N f~ °.!',c.'~Fa~i+~r'3h ~ * h `~S ~ts"g .n ~ 1.•. t.,.v.... ~ 4 d~' 1 4 ` l~ M ` p ' ~ ~ f . , • ~ ~ F~ ea~pp„n N• ' d. i = ti ~p. •a "F~ J~'F " ~ •a~°'~ - ~ ~ : 1 ~ ,S ~ V~~. ,o k ~A . . „ ; 1- ' 7+f.~4~.~y ` ~ ~ ~ ^ 'o . ~ ~ ~ ~ t a + i • ~ ~ T-ej, it' 4►O ~ ~ - r.'a";Y.1 ' ! 2 ~ D' ~ I ' i ~ s~.~ x~ •p G Z ~ ro~ I . b 1 ~ ~ • S;{ Np3/.0~ ~ ` ~ ~ i ' r p .v i~ 7 f r'+I1 ~ u. V 19 1 R, ~ 2 ~ w. , . ' q~, i q ~v v ~ j d• ~ N' -:r C~ ;~gy' ~ a ♦ ! f (~~i~1J ~ . II . ~ u. l+ 0. i 10 ~ ~ T ~~,a,rY yy.~ o + q 4~ I w M~~ `t ~MA~~•r ya ifoi i{~~ 1 A In i f.t c 1 0 ~ ~ u ~ .27 j u i` Z 4 . n .y~ d1 u' n~ eaa N, 2052 osraa. . •x . , . a "eo, ~ 4 3z 0~~ J =e p p 3 I , ~.A P Pti ~to % b s~ L 12 4 evwp. ~ V •Ir P ~ y Q o. g~ i~1 U ~ ~ 40 ti ei: a Z9 . • 23~Iz n~a -IY rm c 0~0~~ Pk~~'K~'Y; a a~ .GouNTY ~ ~ 44 ..l ~ ~ • ~ SPRI~lJ y ~Yf-r"' ` spc)1~/~'tJ~ p"~4 . ~ z3 I N~ "~~4 G R P~ 3 t b~ n;~ I ' wvlseo ~iBa N 96 , N p ~y ~ , ~My N ~ ~Rr~N ~ . ~ o p R~ ro o _ 04 ~ DAT E { ' I ~oN a~pR D~c6 q~ I i~ L 1 a ~~.•.:~~.,~,v ' . ~~a~ z ► o p~ ~ ~ I a m~ `~•~cr;~+~;;5~~?~,~, ,~';,F~'N'y~~;3~'y„~, , ~ ul + t 1 ' t ' ' ~'~"'""°~~:,~,,~r~,~,, `"''i v;Y.5N J~°=~Q ~~~_',''i+r~'~+~(~y',~~ ~"'sz.P .;'~~y~ss~ + wi '~,~~i~~'e:.;~.,'r5::~ i`W~~C«4:.; / ~ f ~ 132 ~ I ~ i ( n. , ..H. T ( tL ? ~ •p~ ~F+ G ' N tj Y ~ A~i ~ Y • r~, ~ i 9 0 ti aAOPOw . ~r . ~s 4&6 v~'A• ~ 4 u r, • ~d;•I~ tL"~i►'iie~►~-'=--_ " -~"'`y~,~!'~y ' N,}j•~G r- Z b' iV 1 ~ ~ Wr I , F~, , c 'I ~ z ^ ~y GK7 4 it0. r , ~ , , ~ ~G• '•r ~ 11 i 'i Z i 1 (T ~ ~9 : ~ ~ 5 ' ~ ~~s: ~.l` i _ _ , `r' + ~ aarN ~ 4 f 7 Q ~ 0 ~ ~ A • t' k 6 ~ 7 8 ~ u ~ ~ ~ s Co c; ~ i z 1 a 2 z' ,,re ~ a U~?.. • A f ~ , ► ~ ~iaa - ~ ut 10 J a (L u T~' . 26 j ~ ~MAlN a „ 0 . ° • 1 ~8 U a ~ 1~ „n ~ ` . a s~ 1 ~ i , • AYE. SCG NW 2032~ _y a~t ~ sar NaZO32 aJ7'eO. e 9~o 12 a ~ v~ 14 15 ~ ~ri I: i~ , • d t'g ~F G~ 1 3~ pt.P~ 60 Ma 6~ k a, 3 I oto I yb s+~ t ~ ~ C 3 a • ~ "i. f M I 'i.'wr 4a •ip ~ 30 f 1 i A„o 2. g' ~ , 0c 1 f pS 90 U _p PP1.Sr✓PV a ~A• No,2312 m ~ jI-° o•o No. 2312. ' ~ " R OAD Gj ~ yi ~ '7~d.1l' ,r'~'~~1 ~ ►L8 w~''Yi ' ~~~V~+ - ~ ~~i~pTm «~1l~9'4/~ ~ . ~ e as ~c,oun~TY SPAA~~S! 4 9POK w~ P•QQ Ni~ c R P I 3 I tc - ~ 1tiy N NiQG aavlsDo ' ~ t A~ • „ e8 ~ l~ f9 q F~a . ~ 0 • DESCR ip'rlON ~ LlNb'iN ro MYi-AR. ! ' DATE' Srf~f/ON REPRaDUC~bO .6-/5_17Z rNlS s ~ • Parcel; 45133.1011 Owner; SONRISE LAND LLC CoOwner: ~ , ~ OwnerAddress 11219 E SUNDOWN DR SPOKANE WA 99206- ~i'08f~Wa~/ , . ~ Site Address 16110 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE rn~ Legal Description VERA E112 BLK 26 EXC S30FT ~ 0 IQV~L-- L9 . n~/ _ o 0 Li esd " . F7- 1 ~ _ ~ Birch ~ Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency. • . F • f~~~ ~7 • ~ ♦ r ~ ' ' r~ + ~ 1~ ♦ . . ; ~ ~y~ jA 1 , M~#~ i•~' "~J.~"~ ~i~}`~~ • . ~ • [ ~ ' ~ ~I~ .P. ~ ~ , ~ M , t~~ ~ r ~ ►~~+y~ a: ~ , ; ~ . ~ ' ~y{ ~ • . • , y. , " r „ ~ ~ ! + ~ t , ~ • ,j`~~'" ~ \ ~ ~~i~ y i+it „ +i E.~~ _1 'yL,!1 ~ s • ~ ; ~ ~ ~ w • ' ~ ' ~ ~ 1 Y' K M . ,r ~ ~ ` 1~ ~ ! • ~ t ` 4~,. f . ~ • ~ ~.~s , ~.ii ~ . ~ ~ . 'Y ~ . ' ' . . ~ ~ ~~~'E~ ~ - ~ , . ~ ~ ~ • . ti/' ~ ►a,~`-, 460~ ' h,~ ~,r ~ ~ ' , ~ } i",,' 1' _ : ; ~T'~ ~ .z ~ . . . ~ 4k ~ . , ..1r'- ~ "~1, • ;At . ~ ,'e.r ~ ~ t ,1 ~ t`" ~ ~ ~ . , ' r ~ ~y +~{~•~1 ~ t •4: ` 4t,~1 ~ ,i,- i . . ' -y . ~ r'~'^'Rl^•;~~"'tiyk .{~f ►t - , ~,~~,•t ~ f~ y~_ T"~w, ~ - " • • ~ ' ~ +~i~ ~ ,s * ~ ~ + > .~Y f ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ . ;1~~,~~-'~,' - ~r • ~ 1 ~ . ~ • , „r•~' t ~ • • ~ ~ ~ t~ 1 w ~ - t • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~tt ~ 7•,, 14, A f ~ , ~ ` y - ~ ~ ~ i d _ ; .1' • .'~.j ~ ~ ~'i ,r ~ ~ ~•~i~~~~ s.~-;"1=~"C'.~ ~ ~ . t - ~;'~a~~t~~•''~ ~ , ~ ~ r~~ y ~~'`~i~i 'U7j~ • ''Ls i" V •Ak i 4- ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ . +~1 ~ ~_f,~/~ ~ w~ i~j t~M , ..~J ~ ~ 4 i . ~ ~"'y " ,1~ ~ ~ ~T ~ 1 . ~ - • . ' ~ , i'~ ~t T *6 ~ f . . ~ . " ~i • ~ . ~~.y~,, ~ ~ ~ +!-:w•/' n , a f ~ ~a► „j~ 7"~ . ' ♦ ~ i.~~ rz ~ . , . . ,.f ~t ~ ~~'r•~,,' ' T - ~ , • ! ~ . .,.4 ~ -~►"~"~r ~ ~ ~1 ~1 1 * i t ~►7 ~ ~ t _ `:r • ~~'.S , ~ . ` ~ ~ _ r ~ . { ~ . . • a~~ ; ' i L~ i ~ • ` f . ~~~~Y. " ' ► . ~tl~~ -s ''~i t~ Vo•~/r r t • ~ ~ • • ' ~ ~ ~'~y'F~, ~ ~ # . , ~ a ~ s f r . • . L . ~ R, ► ~ ~,~~.1- . ; . ~ ,f A" tiL r 4 , ~ , *.a, . ' . . 1 r . ~ ' - ~ ` ' . ~ ~,x ~,t i , t ~ ' i` ' 4 ~ r_ ~ . ~ , . ~ . • ~ ♦ • ! ' . . 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~y,' ~ • . . . ' ' ~ ~ r - r * , n , . i'* - , ~t~~~E~^ ~ ~ •~I ~ . ~ , ~ : ~~s,~, ~ • V + ~ . " + „s r t~ • ' v ~ . ~ • ~ ~ - . Y ` t ..,.x , Alp , '~_9r ~ y ~.~}.~,i . y . • - ~4y ~ * t • ~ 'v ~ IL ~ ~ ~A ~vt. •i ~ ? R ~ . ~ ~ ;tii ~ R~ . ~ . Y •a~ Y _.,r . _ `~`~'ti' ~.r ~ . i i ~ . ~ f ~h~ , • ( : t 4~.♦ 1 ~ ' ~F •f" .1'' .{1~~-;*~! I, . } ~ . ' • ~s r~ +~y - 1 ~ r,~~n~ ••`i. e-~.,'~ 10 . r 14~~~ y ' ~ ' _ i ~ w , L ~ ~ • < i ~ . , ~ I r ~ ~ ~ ~ t , . 'c R • {i; fi +~~~w- r . R • ~ + s . . ~ ~ ♦ ;1, ~ i - ~ . ~ 1►;r.I ~ ' ' i-~~ r : +"~R • "y~'' L~ 4 ' f - s ~ ~ n,y ~ I ~ t ~.1¢ ~ . ' ~ • t t~ ~ : ~A ~ I . ~ 1 , _ . ~ • .r . 5 ` . . i ~ f ~ ~ ♦ 7 ~ ' • ~ ' ;r. , I . s ~ f' ~ 1 ~ ~ .,•,3 • ' U y ~ , 7', ~ E ~ ~r ~ ~ - ~ . , • ~ ~ ~ . ' . ~ <-Y~ 4~ - ~ ' ~ ~ r * t .a- / • ~ ~.7 ~ ( f- # ~r'~ r ~ ~1 ~ ; ~ t ~ y 1 ~ { • 4 ;~i `41 y• ~ r • •s~ •+~,i-~~r~+ s ~ ~ ry.~ ` ,~'!i~ ~ v i ♦ • 'r ♦ ti t . 1.,, ~ ~ r ~ • a ~4! - ~..~•,"'r ~ . . - ; ± _ . . , . , _ r ♦ + . f ~ N fi ~ ~ . ~ - ~ , ~ ~ . s~ M ! k~ • ~ r ~ ~a - 1 • i . . ~ • ~ ;i, „ .i: t . ~ a ~ t. ~ - J~a ~ f 1 0♦ M~; i ~1~ • ~ ' ~ • • ti - + .x~',~n. ' ~ ~ : r ~ ~ ~ tf j . h- ~ + • ~ ~ ( ~ ' ~ _ . ' • '*4~ ~ ,x ~ ~ ~ • ` ~ . _ ' ' •l' , . • ~ . ~~•~~I 1 y - ~ ~ i ' ~ ' ~~.~s ~ • i' ~ t ~ . 4- ~ , ~ ► . , ~ / • ` ~+.~g ~ - . - , ' , 3~"~:"~.: i « ' .J ' ' ` "_~„~',r r - ~l~ ~ •.M t-. ~ ~ ' - ' ~*1r .r' ~ ' • . ~ si.~` `~f~t~- y- : •ti►a;~ ~ i ' ,ry r, ~ % ~ . . . ` ` ~~~~A• ~s~. ~ T. C " • ' , } . . ~)A . • , ~ , . ~ ~ ' ~ \ ~ - ~ ~ ! w1 • i . . ~ ~ +t 1 I ~ ~~a~ ~ ~Iy' ` , \ 1 , . + t*-~ ~ ♦ * i 1 ~ :s ~ ~ 1 . y ~ ~Ar}',!k •I! ,f~/ ~ ~ • , { `~~t~ ,~t+f~~ ~"l ~ 4' t , • ` ~ - :```y' ~ ~ ~ . . ~ 7 '~°y' w ♦ . . . ~ •i. ~ ,•~''t~ j~, ~ - . r - ~ " • f ~ ~t '~4 ' y `l4. . ' ~ ;f' t , ~ ` t.. ~ . ~iy, . f I . ~ ' . # ~ ,~?°tl' - . ~~«T ,T" ' ~ ~ , w }4 . , 3i i. ~ . - k. - ~ . • . f .~,Ir.~ y.. t ~ i I' _ . . . s 4.., ~ y ~ • ` . ~ t+ " V,.., ~ ~ ~ ' ..t + ~ • , . • ~ a~y ~ .I i ~ v~~ _ `~4 ~►F_ . ! ~ . . ' . . . ~ h.^ , ♦ Y.~ P _ ~ • ~ .•F~ .~~,i ~ _ • ;j~ ~_~\j ~ ` ~ ~ au' yr ~ * ~ ` t1'w ' y , ~ ~;,i, Y , ~ •x , 1 3 ~ ~ ~ ' I'"~fv!~ ~ ~ ~ t- ~►+"p '°~T { ; ` . ~ _ Y - Y . ♦ ~ :J ~ ~ I ,e ~r * f . ~ ~ • ` ' -s ~ ~ ' t ~ ` , . " ~ r~ r ~t 's~,- ~ - • 4~` F~ i ° ~l . , * ~ ' "'~,~j 4 ty ~ f ~ a . 4 . r. I f.~4' F 1 ' < ~ ~ r > r r - f k~ ~ ~ ' i ► ' . ~ { : ~l .t.• «r 1 ~ ~4 S ~ rt . ~ y ; w .~~n ; 1• : ~,t ~ ►r ~ f^ a}`~! f~':ti 'r . 1,7 "v',~.~' ~ . P ° i'~ ' • IW R t ,,i.~. ~ ~ a~' ~ ~ i r. 'r Y L ~ ' ` "4 ~ . • " _ j jj • s ! 's~ fi i~i'..y T . r , * ' • ~v r,,. { ;j~j ~Y~~"7~- 1~ ~ • ~ ~ ' .~y9'~ ^~1~ s~ : ~ j ~t}~~ ~y I~ , • ~ ~ 1 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,,~d, : « - 4~~ i • . . . 4 '.1 ~ ii~~~ ~ ~ y ,t J. . ~ ; ~~~t. F+ 11,~'ti~ ~ r. • ~ i . * ~ ` 4 . " 1 .1 . . ~+a t' 1 ' ~y ~ ..}.1 I • - •a . , , r ;t . . `t. A ~r•~.~'►. _ ~ . - . ~ . t. t f . ~S . . ~M. F{ ~:w♦ F ~ ~ • t ti.~ • ~ ' # ~ r . • a, . t ~ k ~P! ~ ~N` ` ~ '~,.r. ' + • . ~ ° ~ ~ i ~ ~ 3 4 + i 1 . ` ~ _ S ~ P , . ' ± •a ' j~~J i' Sir , . =0rt~~ • ~ ~ a ' ~~i1'~~~'. ,`s~, j~-ti }!'~`i!: U,~. . ' ' 7 1•"I~y,,., 11 _ • ~ ~~~'~~`y~~,`~ ~f v,o , , • t'* ~ . . , 'r"~•": ~__r . _ :`a_.' . } • i.y~ i 1. ~ ~~~~-T►~ , . a,y . ♦ ' . . s~ y y ~ ~f I } ~ ' . . ~ _ i . .,ti ! 1 • ~ ~C--'.. i~.,~ ' •~'{.`,r1 I~ . • . . 9~~~~ 1• t. ~,~r1 . ~ ~ ~ ' A - ~ ~`1.~ ~r M,.f . . . ~ 1 ~ a ,~,I : i aw',. ~ • ♦ + ~ ' ~ . . ~ ~ i ~ f i , ~ ` . . ' ~ A~ ~ ~ . ` - , It.1. ,.r,`<~i . {+•i' ~ .y~' M~ '~"~~~rfiN~ • . ! , , . ~•'!r1Ln~~'fMM M~ ~ . • • ~ . ~ ` F A, , . , , { r . ~ , ; • ~ ~ . . .y~..r' k,~~a~ ,w • • ♦ ~ . .~R.. . • 11~ ~ ~ ' ~ .a ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ . r . ' %"f ~~~y r . , , .iN ..1• + ~r ` . • .1 , _ . ~ i . ~ t ~1 . , .A1~.1 ~ I ~ ,.~~`~y•, a. _ R. .~i~,- _ ~ 4~ ~ i ' , M~ , ~ . • , ~ i.,~,~~~ ~ ' 4 ~ . . . i ~w , . - Aks I' r • !~j~ i 1, ~ ~ t • ~ ' 'a , y ' r ~ . • • . ~ ♦ ~1^x~ ' ~1 i IS~ "y' ~4M'y` a ~ 1f F ~ 1 1 I 4r ~ r • • Y~. ' ' ~ ~ !r'! P r~Fi~ ~ 1.» ' ~ A - _r~ ~1°r,~ .~i~,'`"i..» Y ~a yt~ . . - ' ~I A~ rT 'i.~... `rr,,, ~Y ;~i ' 3 S~ ; Q, ti~ : .,?r. ~ .~'-.~.Ilf~ . ~ . . . ` . . ~ , . ' . i • ♦ i 'vS~A ~ . t a ~,,~R M ~ ~ ' .Y r r ~ 1, . r r . , . , , 1. r : = : . ~ ~ ! ~ _ ~ . r9~~ f r ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , _ `%ni+~` ~ - , ~ N~ , ` . _ i',fi , M~a1'`' 'R~ i ~r ~ .f ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . • ~ . , ~ •~.,~j, r ra t'~ •R1' ~ ,,,r,l; a~r' ~ { w ` ' ~ i , ' , ~ , 4, dl~ ~i , li~ `1 ~ ~ , ~ • 'ti ~ . ,r~ Ir~ ♦ ~ ' ~ • l, ~h v?' . V~ ♦ ,1~~ M,M• , . i ~ ~ , ~ ,'i ~ ~ ~ ,i ~,-`1y~-' ,.L..'.' . • . . " ~ „ t ~ ` ~ . . .I , ~ ~ ~ , ^ ~..._.~,►,w a♦ i . . 4, • ~ . ~ ~TM, j " 'v ~+'9R~ . 't>#^.-' r ~ I i i y~ ► . ♦1A~r ~ ` + . " 5 r ~ ~ ~l~r i . ~ ~ , 4 t, ' ~ . • ' r ' ; t . " Y , • - • i i , ~ . . , ~ . `il P~ ' : ' 1 / ~ a~ . ♦ g`,~ A'E a ~ ~ f~ M • ' , ~ .,r ~ # ~":4. T ' f~'~ - ~ i r s A,,' ~ ♦ ~ rY~r ~ . ~ . ~ ' N~11~,~'rki~ ~s. ~ew , y~a, i ~ r } ~ •;y x . ' !'i \ y. ~ ~ ~I • ~ . . ; . > _ . z- ro ~ ~AWy7 f . ..r 1~ . y. _ y . ' . . ~ . . , • • - ~ ' • . ~ ` . ,.'i ~a xd^~~~k7` »C . ~ri~~~f~~l~ ~r ~ 1 - ' ~ . . .i. w. , ..rr.- . , ' n~.i~' k. d'H`'~f'~ .a , 5+f~ . ~ ~ . • . , ~ t .IR4 ' . i • _ • r , , ~ , . - Y ~ .M€i~ ~ y I. ~'I~. _,/P'M~'~'~~ •h,~ ~ ~sFJ. . ` • . • ~ ~y,, . ~-+~W r~ t"'.- `!r r`. ~ ,o• ' j ~ ~w • _ ~ ti~► I+ s, IJ~ ' i. ~ a af ~ ~ ~a ;MI~'~r i " p' ri,- - .Ir~ ~ ' . w . , r~y ' _ •~~►M"~ r~t r ~ ,y~, r 4. . . . J115 ~ ..rl~ I~ . - / ~ # . . f ~ ~ ^ r '1 ~ : , ~ ~ . . r , .r► ~ ti ' ~ ~1 _ ' _ ~ _ • ~ ~ ~K ~ ~ ~ ~ • w ,~,y I ^ r A' . , I J t ~~i~ ,vI } • .~r a Q ' .r ~ F 1 • :Y r • f ~~r ";s', t ~ , _ , . , ~ ~ ~ .r~., "a'_ . ~ ~ . . ~ . I ~ , ~ ~ ti `r~ / i s O; r2 12,1 -1 'V L) ~ , , _ . . , . _ _ - - - . . . , ~ . . . , , ~j~ ~ . ♦ . ' . , , y "w/ . . . . . . . . . ' R • , « ~ -r " { 11, 17,.. Y+~;:.< I' ♦ ~ry~..r ~~,~~Y 1N ~l e ~ .3' N ~ t r-^ . r ~ ~ • w ~ - ' - ~t , ~ ule ,1 G 1 = 1 alop~ , ~ - ~ ~ - i - ~ - " i'1` ; _-f _ •I ' elOu0s 1`1 t - - - 1 G-- 1 - , - %)eo ~ C) a~ ~ Ua . _ _ ~ utiIA C) ' ~ ~ ~ , ' i _ ~ 70. - ~ ~ 90016 ~ ; ? L ~ po • County • blic Works, Transp• ♦ • • ' ' • Section, Div"ision o • • • Memo To: Michael Dempsey, H Examiner From: Scott Engelhard, n o ngineering and Roads Date: January 1traoWe 1 RE: Status of venue/Conklin Road Traffic Signal In the public hearing for ZE-20-00 held on January 3, 2001, you asked why this proposal was not required to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road after receiving public testimony that previously approved development proposals in the vicinity were required to do so. I have researched the previous proposals and submit the following: PE-1750-94/PUDE-4-94, ZE-29-96 and ZE-68-96, all of which areLand Use Applications submitted by Buster Heitman, have an Engineering Condition of Approval to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. In PE-1750-94/PUDE-4-94, construction of the traffic signal was to occur at such time the Sprague/Conklin Intersection met traffic signal warrants per the Manual of Uniform TraffiG Control Devices (MUTCD). In ZE-29-96 and ZE-68-96 construction of the Sprague/Conklin traffic signal was to occur commensurate with the CRP 2676, which constructed Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road. Prior to construction of CRP 2676, signal warrants had still not been met per MUTCD. Therefore, to prevent future disturbance to the intersection pavement, electrical conduit and junction boxes were installed with the CRP in anticipation of the signal being constructed. Per the traffic study, with the inclusion of ZE-20-00, the Level of Service (LOS) for the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin Road is not failing and is LOS D. The applicant was required to perform a signal warrant analysis forthe intersection of Sprague AvenuelConklin Road and none of the 13 warrants as specified in MUTCD. When a signal warrant analysis is performed it provides a"snapshot" of current traffic conditions using actual ground traffic counts and does not forecast future traffic volumes. 4 ( y ~ ~ After further review of previous land use proposals in the surrounding area and the traffic study prepared for this proposal; Spokane Cou Engineering fnds that this proposal contributes 2.4% of the total intersection v the "build-out" year of 2005. Although the traffic study shows the LOS is not failin ign warrants are not met, this equates to a contribution of $3600.00 for a typical nal system valued at $150,000.00. The following Condition of Appro I i mitted to the record for ZE-20-00: Prior to the release of a building permit the applicant shall contribute a pro-rata share for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. The traffic signal shall be installed when signal warrants are met per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The estimated share of this cost is $3600.00 and shall be paid to the County Engineer. 0 Page 2 -i+ Q - STORHAUG - ~T ---ENGINEERING - ~ E c ~ a E Ci ~ il ~n9ne=erin and.Project Management ~ ~ 9 I~r_(~ ~ i.._._► ~ ~ j January 18, 2001 N 2 3 2001 ~ ! SPOKANE C011NTY H=ARIrJG EXAMINEq ; Mr. Michaei Dempsey Office of the Hearing Examiner Spokane County 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Subject ZE-20-00 January 12, 2001 Correspondence - Submittal of new inforrnation from County Engineers Office Dear Mr. Dempsey: We have reviewed the reference information as was delivered to our office and offer the following comments. The 2.4 percerrt irrtersection volume increase as determined by county staff was based upon the original site which had a total of 195 units. As presented at the public hearing, the revised and current site plan illustrates 125 units. The traffic engineer testrfied that the refined development proposal (new site plan) will decrease traffic impacts by 35 percent, from what was shown in the previously submitted traffic report. The point I wish to make is that the proponent will uftimately be paying an amount greater than their fair share of the traffic signalization. However in the interest of time, simplicity, and as a show of good will to the local neighborhood, our client agrees to the additional condition of approval as recommended by the county engineer department. Thank you for your attenticn to this matter. Sincerely, Jerry Stofiaug , ~ Stofiaug Engineering JS 1322 North Monroe • Spokane, Washington 99201 Phone (509) 242-1000 • Fax (509) 242-1001 . , « . .G.. _ SEl tTOWNEERING RHAUG ~ ~1_ _ r.M~•r. ~ ti•r • ~~~il n~. PrQject°Mpnagement January 18, 2001 Mr. Michael Dempsey Office of the Hearing Examiner Spokar3e Coun#y 10261Nest 8rosdway Avenue Spokane, Wash+ngton 99260 . ~ SubjecL ZE-20-00 January 12, clence - Submittai of new infomtation from County Engineers Qfflce Deer Mr. Dempse}r. We have reviewed the reference information as was delivered to our affioe and afifer the foliowing comments. The 2.4 peroent intersedion volume increase as determined by counfy staff was based upon the original site which had a total of 195 units. As presented at the public hearing, the nevised and curren# site pfan illustrates 125 uni#s The trafFic engineer testified ihat the refined deve►opment proposal (new site plan) will decrease traffic impacts by 35 percent, from what was shown in the previously submitted traffic report. The point I wish to make is that the proponerrt will ultimately be paying an amount greater than thair fair share of the trdffic signalization. However in the interest of time, simplicity, and as a show of good will to the locai neighbofiood, our client agrees to the additional conditian of approval as recommended by ihe aaunty engineer department. Thank you for your attiention to this matter. Sincerely, Jerry Storhaug ~ Stofiau9 Engineering JS • ' . , ; . . 1322 Norfh Monroe Spokone, Wvshington 99201 , _c' Phone (509) 242-1000 • Fax (509) 2424-00V ~ rt y ~t 1~ a . - It ' Mnw.~ . ~ e ' ,t `'r+~' : ~ .s tiC~^ ' ~~t~~ ~ . ~ . , ` • • ~ . j ~1 a y ` _ i :t'. . ~ d" ~ ~7 w ~ .+Y i - . R • ~ , I+ ~ ' T. _ ' , - ~ _ - ~ ~ x~ J j - + , - , 1 °•w~ t : e ~ ` J ~ " ~y;+~ , µ `s . . . . . . , . ' _ 1 , ' r s ~r. ~ F . 1h-. k ~ 4 ~ r~ R ~ '^~~w ~ ^a' !~'t~ • 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ • , f~ ~ ~ ~ w tti~~ _ t y"• r, . r ~y t r~r k ~ ~ ~'M~ ~ ~ ~ , . y r . - . . ~ ~ . : a. , ,7 ~ _ ° y ~ ~s~,~ ~I ' " . i~''. ,3 : - j ~ ~ 1 . • ~ ~ ~~r~v ~ , ~ + ~ ~.r ~ " r ~ ~,~Y. > .s ~ :.,1,~~+*►. ~ ~ ~ , -r/~`~,~ ~ - " ,~~,~r Ic~. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +,~1r-„ - ~S ~ ~ ` jj~.~ * , , ~ - s , y. . ~ ~r. ! ~-r- ~ ~S ' ~•s-:, ,~i~~A/~R"~ e `f,~, ~,':«d„ ~ ~t ~ ~ t A ~ ~ i ~ ♦ .R ~ , . 4~i.:'x~'~~ a~lf f ~ ` r~~~=~~ ' t ' '°"y~. - w ~ F'' i~ ~ . : ~ M ' .~~v t . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R 1 'yyj~` + - - K 4 . ~ ~ y ~ , ' 7 r .r r s { a ~ i _ ~ • ' 1 , r„ ~ - ~r~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ . s!-~ !r ~IlT a ~ , d..~ , , k~. r t r M 1 l 1 - ~ r , ` ~y ` ` , ~ ~ ~ ' . ~.r . 1 ~r ~ 'y ' - ~ - Y~-'~ 1~ : ; ~C a; ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ !~4 ~ ' t_• - `-~r 4 . . f~ Ti~' ~ ` . . ~ L..~, ~ . . ` ~ ~ ttIL ~ ~ Xn.w, . . _u -i.y - -,,f f,t r., ~y!•Y .r".i i ltw ' ~r , t: '-i'., t rw- • T)t h :a. , n: ~r';. ~q: . r' . ,~y,^• N,:r. _ ~n• :1, v 'v.~r",~t` y•''y',^ v ''i` 14IlM DD YYYY v SPOKANE COUNTY CASH RECEIPT DATE: Bath Sections Must be Completed Department / Distnct Additional Infounatioa Cash • rtYl}Y- Q Nt ('nf1 ^1 ! y ~i Q!; v Name of Preparer. 'lu /1 L - LL I IJ &.ti/ I-W Checks V1 ~ Phone Number. Elecvonic Transfers . , +0 Authoazed / A roved b ~ - pp Y' Ctedit Cards ~ ~ Receipt Numbers Outside Bank Deposits : m r,n' BeRinninjr. EndinX. . ~ C.2 ~ ~ Total =,n Fi (j, ~ ~LM wo mm S&CIL a, DEsQ'W,M MAO,H► : rl-3 a ~uh ~ 9Ct00 1 41~)~ wtc~nm~ `~2~' ~~c,~t M ~ vcwr " JW AiYPE r suB-CAt K~ Rvrcu Ac.T PEvNk 2 ~xr w~+o oRo PRoo ssa er ~rrmRo, oE~vrIoa ra ch PCl1ff pFtbJ ACTMTY AN RTYaE GAT 5UBCAT ACCOUNf FIRa ORO PR00 6&0. BY OiITNAW DESCPoPTpN A110UHT ~ , 3 ~ pCLNT PRDJ AGTMTY AN RiYPE GlT SUB-GIT 4 AcCOW Fuo oRo Psoo saa er w1ma oEsarrrM AMoun ; PWNf PRW AGTMfY AH R11'PE GU SLH-Gi TOTAL ~ WHITEWATER CREEK, INC. Spokane County Engmcer ] O(3/2001 7758 Date Type Reference Onginal Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment 10/03I2001 Bill Sullivan Loop Ramp 3,05904 3,059.04 3,059 04 Check Amount 3)05904 C~22~ 85 Mtn. West - Corporate 5ullivan Loop ltamp 3,05904 ~ s i i~ RE~~NE ~JR-3.5 TO UR-~~ F4R ~I L~CATED @N T~iE SW 1 4 SEC 13 T. 2~ N., R, 44 W~M. i~ SP~KANE CaU~lTY, WASi~INGTQI~ _ °1 ~ucuo , ~1 s ~ o ~ ~ ~ i r_ , 1~`~` ~ ,.~:I'.:TIl~f{i ,If. :3:. .....J;~ ~3i. , ~ ~ p" ~ - ~ ; I ~ U s~. r~u~ --~r.~__~. ~ c~~ ~ Q - ~ - - - - ~~~}en_~n; p~,u~wi~ - ~ - - - - - ' f~_ '1 - T - - ~ - - ~ a ~ ~ ~I~~1~ _ - - r - - - - - . _ - ~ ' !W'f !,r`i z - ~_ry_ _ ~tn'e~na iaoo ur w~r u~€ ~ VA~L~YWAY ato~ex~ rw~~ or rr uv~ ~ ~ - - - - ' - - J5 ° e . - . , - ~ - - - - - - - ~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~j . ~ - ~ ~r ~ •r, - - - ~ ~ -r~- ~ 1~, `r _ .i- _ ~ , I a~,~, a~+ ~aAK } 9 - ~ ri 2Ff IM[ II l►wp6L'M[ 58~Y' f+E ~/.bd ~ y'4' TiPf 0. ~,i51~rJil;au'E St~' f'[R ~k.efi6 n • I~-, ~ ~ 10, N - - - ~ 2 ~ , ~ I ,i ~ Y - m r,. ~,..,+w . _ - , . . _ - ~`1 . ~Hmr ~ar ~ ~ . I - _ - - F. _ _ ~ r . i J r k,~~~ ' . C { . I . ~ ~ m ~tm' S[~N+ua uNt ~ _ ~ I! iuAU~' w~A+d ~ w~a ~ ~WI ~Yir9laa~+f i .i 1 ,.Ri ~ ~b' srnEf~ i~F ~w' i~~rux utit ~ ..1~_ j "~`~j ~ 4~?~'!' Flma~ arwr or rar ~ r,~ ~ta~s+n+~ u+[ ~ _ v?~ _ _ _ i~,rw~++ ' acau~5naw ur~ ' - ~ I---- --y-- _ _ r . +x~w ~r~+~rm ~ ,i, ~ n~t e ~+w~rsraP[- p , ~ C~ veucrr~r _ ~ ~ _T L r~ , ~ ~ ~~1.~E Y ~ - Ea ~ u 1 ~,A ~ i ''!;~`ww, , 5nr vE~ r~lYw _i t6 .1 ~ `:1 . . ~:n~.. ~;~'~~i t~: I ~ _ [ 1 - ~ ~ .~~-.o'+,i~4~~~~ ~ ~ . . . I ~ ~ ~ ~i.. I T . ~ v N ~ r ~ VY .~~k! " M.' ' ~ti~~. " h U} I . w W~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~~:~'i. ~ ~ I ~ ~j ~ ~ r~ I ~ ~If~ ~''r~ ~ ~ I - ...ti't~. 4 ~ ~ . : ! ~ ~n h . ~~ti i I . u~ I ~ . . , r~ ~n 7J ,M o' i i7 a I ~ 0 cr)~ , I ~I i t~ r r~ I ;~t ¢~~i?t'' , F P~i ~ .6~. '~~1ri1~~,T-"'j~ - ~M, . I _.i ~ ~ . ~:S'~ i r ~ ~ r ~ 4•L~i l~~.,y~'~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ 4 ,i~ I :2 .v ~ z ~ ~a I I I ~ I + ~:n~ I e ~1 , N ~ ~ . ~ ~ T ~ ~ 4 Or1 ~ 9f'I ■ ~ I , ~ ~ I ~ I u ~ ~ . . ` h ~ . - { y y f' _ S' Y 19k~ llE ~ ~ ~ I ~ i y 'j I I . iL yyl ~ f/1 I ' t: : l ~ ~ ~ ~s~ ~[sa~t~ u„.. , ,~4,, ~ . ~ ! ~ ~s~ st~ ure ~ ~ , i , " ~ 0 r i, I r' , 7~b, d~ I ~ll'„~ ~ E7(1SThMC ~IJML[~ING ~ ~ .,i~.y, ~ ~ . ' ~ 6' I'~ F . ~ 2"~-;=. prv df H[~kM61 I+I 0 z ~ ,t ; y I,I„ 3 Ir~f uwmscu~ snnr ssm ~f sw ~ I J~ ,MM~,~~' r ' ^i ~1~~1;,D~~ _ ~ ~ ~ r &s ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , - ~.'Nd ~I. i ~ i - ~ y ~ ~ I , ' ~ ~1~ ,e ' . ' ` ~ E',.' 1'I;,:I~' ~Mt~i l _ PRDPCYS~I} 5tD£~fktl~ ~ ~ ~',.F~.F j:hFf . ~°1~ i' ~ I.~:1 3€~~ ~ Ir~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ V~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ .~M f ~ ~ ~ Y . . - { _ i~ u t~~ V i g - ~ _ . d ~ 'i' ' . ~ - ! _,a..__ u~iNrrrw~nrs ~~w~rrh~ ra , ~ ~ ~ o~nor,u ~ ~ I ~ ~ , _ ~ sr~~s ~ _ . 'a~' ~ ~~9' f iM}.a ~ ~ P ~ r ry ' ~•.=1 . 1 PRdP05E~ AS HALT ~ - \ .`I~ " ' I ~ll ~ ~ , ~ ~1 ~ S - > ~ ~ ; - . . - . ti z, ~ ,u Y4,~~.:4 ~ ~ I I i~ E. z: R E A t I!0 N I a ~~r ~t-.;~=4 s I ~ : , ;4:1 4 ti . 1 ~uwr ~ u~er~ ~ ~ , ~ , i~ R E A , 6 ; ' I ~I i 1 . { ,i _ 7;~~r,~ i t 1 fl ~TC~kIES , i~ . a , ~ ti~~ Ik i'I, a , ~j,~ ~ ~i i ~ ~ ~,.r.~ 1M~~~, ~ I b ~ ~ w i, { ~,I ~ I , i, ~ ~m I °"'"T I ~ I ~ ~ ~r~~ ~ ~~r ~r~: i { ;~x ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~r ~ ~ I- i: ,e ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ i " 'a ~ ~ ~ ~ II~~ ~l. ~''R I ~ ' i~ Ex15TINC ~4NE R~RQPOS£D ZdFJE kCRfS OR S.F. . I 4 ~ 1~ ` - ~ H S.F_ I wr`~ I~ ;Utt , ` - ` ~ ~ l1R-~.5 ~IR-22 S.D AC i ;r~ i ~ ~ _.i, p~y y.~rpy~.~ C■tp r ypy 1 LJ .~I~~.~ I ,Iv~ ~fn~,-,y' ~ q ~ 'Ik..• Il.e~ ~ LIV~'~~~~51 ~•Gry~AN. ~k1.JJ9 ~f L~,T~7 ~ ...~i~. `~iy'I~ n~l' 1~ ~ f.l~.~~fl.l~.~,. . P, ~ I I~ t I ~~11V~Pi3'IC 4~E(S) 5Eh1i6R /'MIPLid~A~~111LY I ~ ~ , ~ ~ d ~ ~;,.r, ! ,1'~i ~ - ' ~E~taR ~ I LAN~3SCAPE~ lwREA5 Z~',770 SF. C8x} i~~ ~I ii Y~~-u i'~r Nk7Y15 f~ SEkaliJk ~ i kMILY 9 w 1 ~~II TtPf C1F ~ANDSGAplNG TTPE lil ~ u~ , ,I ~i~.`~_;, ~ ~h ST~IES V ~~a UNITS r, . I ~ a ~ ~ 3'. ~ 2 srraR,ES ~ ~,i PARKIh~G Rf4UIRE6 221 ~ ~ i~ k ~i ~ i ~ : i~ ll: ,,r„ ~4 . ~ I ~.~s + Rq ~ - - . ~ ~ , ~ H~ t '~ia - ~I~I, r r ~ ~ [1EI3 2,3~ „ , . , , f ~ f~ , . ~ I il~ ` ~ ~~f _ ~ ~ t Ct?YERE[} SFACf 4J~lt MAl1. OF~IONAL . , _ _ cr W Rz ^~G-=+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r ~ ~S 1 ~u ~ i ~ ~ . ^ . I 4.+~ ~ v ~ I y~~ '~~"~IIf~'~~'. ~ zo'~rewx4~[~-'y1 aREN ~PA~ N71,531 SF. (i~~) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~f 9~' ~ _ J~'"'~ 9~'•, n ,~~.r s~urtn ' EiuI~d1NG ~r~lleKS ,.s;t:' ~ ~ ``_,:.,~t~i,, ~ - ~w+uks' i~tu ~ I~F1141V1 35" (FftGAI C~~IfERIJM~ ~,J ?uNE.}._ H Lt) , ~ -i~ii { p,,~,.: , , s~+~ar ~ { .;~~K i w~~ti , z~~ ~ stl~ii:G ~ I f ~~~.r~ ~ ~ + ~ ~~;I _ , ~ S16E 5~. d~ 15 . i.~ik:U ~.~k. ti r~ I zI~ ~~~C~ ~ a~~y r,.: ~ im~+~at+iet~a~~~,.:_~ ri , _.i.. ~ 'S~;14 ~ xEL. " ~11 ~I~ I V i , ~~A~R ~"~A ~ 4 i ~ . , '~.i4~t; ~ .".v~ ~.J' !tti~~~~ jr+,r I a 'r ~ ~ . , . ~ r . , . , s •,.a, I ~ " ~ ~ ~ l f: ' _ , `:i. , ~ BUILC7NG Ih~~IGHT .}8' (MA~IYI~U~l~ . . . . • } A _ _ f ~1 i r S,. ~ PW 41 ' ¢ - . p~yY~ E~y 1`Iy~y i ti__ I ~ L t.. . . ~ ~ . ~ LO ~i~~ - ll i ~ , ~ . . 1 d ~ il~ ~ ..X Pl1VI ~~Lll ~d!!I ~d 1~ ~ r. ~ {'al~ ;1 1► ~ ~ ~ I - '~~fri ~ ° I ~ ~ , ~ r. ~a I.~ - . I' . ~ y ' I PR4Pp5ED I}~MS~fY 1.5 LYNIT PER AGR I ~ , ~ _ . . . -T- . . . . ~~T r~~._ 1 ~ 5 E CRe LL. aw~R (iC < . , ' ~ ~ > ~ ~~~1=:~ li { . ' 7`1_i _ ~ _1~~~~~~f s€r~1~56t ~ Wa~TE~ V~ld~A WRd~R k P~OYhER ~ F~R~ Q15~I~1 F~1 D > ~ "1',' ~ I~ `I I~ I 1 S 11N~'f S i ~ ~ s~ 2 Sidr~ES 1 S~H~QL f~15TRICT CEN~lA~ ~ALLfY I ~ • , ~ i - ° "~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~rr ~ ,n "~1'; l~ { ~ - 15 Ni l'S . f ~ ~ ~a,r ,I.; ~ r ~ r . * ~ ~ . 4, ~ , u+ ~ l r s 5 u N l r~ 7 5 4 R 4 E ti i ~i.; 11/15TC1fHE5 - i I HIY ED ~ W - ~ ~ ~~1' " - ~ . . . ~ EYk7~FNti7 ACLf 55 W IF I . ~ - ' - I'4~ ~r' - - - - - 15~ `I#~FFa LN[ ~ ..r I . ~._i. . ~~I _,!-r..~ r . # ry ~ ~ r G~r~~r +~ss s~,~ _ ` - ~ ~~U ~ ~o-~ tr~r r uec?st~wc nrxw i-t~ r~~ I. . ~y~ yp~+u~c rxx ~ rm~ a t+wr~~ sr~~r Ke +rcao ~ G~ARI~IC ~CAL.C - ' ~ 1 2000 _ } . fii4" ~ • . , • . a a. ,a h ~ ~ ~ • , - 3 , _ + ~ 1N1Y ENG{NF~~~ ~ , ~ . ~ , ~ ' . r' : ~ ~ • -~'~_,1. ' :rJ,,~ ~ r~~ flu~r~~'I~1MY ~dvIG~NF:_a ~ . . , . - , ' , ~ ~ ~ ~x . L ~ ~ y ~ :a kN~1E:s rr~r~ ~ • + ~ ttm-~ ~ . ao n ~3 cnsr~c wrx~rr a~rnr ~u+~~ ~AIN AVEN~lE ~RJHI~IPR~}1!'ED RlGhf T p~ WAY~ ~ WMhlbl/~MIZ l4i6 A!'q5S RCl~6 $ ~rJ SHEEI ~ - ~ ~ ~~f{ ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ LAN 1 OF 1 ~ . . _ , , . ~ . „ 'r ! , , . . r' . . : . .h~~:. , . • . ~ ~ . , , ,,v , ;:E: , , ~ „ . . ~i~,i. , , . , ORD GALL ~FONE Y~ll al4 45E-~Q{1 ~ ~ - . ~.~r.~r.u YOu Dr. +sa-M* I l':J)%:Cl JIaIUS :1C1ivC ENGINEER'isn-~i~!V, W SHEE7' ~ _ As IIuilt 1'lans lts~ccivccl Rezone Fite ZE-0020-00 -oo Riiad Pians Approved Campanian FiIes: ti~•.~ ~Zs:::f tira^ctar~i, SI~•;; 11•: f.ir ~ Rclaltd Filts: lle~rin~;: E3uilding Urpt: 1 cc:ulical iti:vicw: 07120-12000 Yretiminary Rrvirw: Type. I.urgc Lut F_D HtJg. SyunrC Frcc 11ate Kercivcd: 071i17,`2000 Aln. 1.aLS: Nu. Acns: 4.0$ Project 1nme UR-3.5 TO UR-22 LNDEPENDENT SENIOR LIVING 195 tINIT `itr AdJrm W. CQNKLM. N. 'NtAIN, C. Sl'LI_[\'AN, S. V:1LLEl'WAY, lpplirant Kange=Township-Scc:tion: 44 • 25 - 13 1'ARCFL(S): (tirst 20) feffMnrse C'onditians Mailcil: 4;131.II,I 1 441 >3.0Nl)' `1 OFtHAl1G11 ENGINGL•R(NC~ Flood 'Lonc tvo i 322 N Munroe Waw Source Publ,c SPUKANE. WA 99201- Scwer Source N,i,hc Plwnc School Uist (509) 242.lW0 Fire Dist 1 Pf1O11C ntst 1 Wc•sI En6 [iilliag QNaer SUNWSL: LANU LLC SOIvKISi [_\ND l t 219 E. SunJawn Lh 112 19 E Sundoim Ur SPOKANE,IYA 99206- SPUKANF, WA 99206- Survevur Phunr (SOy) 622-3575 Phonc Mitetull Guryea (509) 622-3575 DURYL•A & ASSOCIATTS 710 F. Glrncrest tk Signed riumc: J GKAN PEELSON SPUK.ANr, WA 99205 13co1Jw,~ Ph: 477-3675 / Planning Ph: 477-21-03 Conlact: ~ Dute Submitted nes 'ptian Initials Cng'Vcc.-cf 1'cchnicully Comp]ete Cng Need Harvard Rd Mitigaticm F.ng Need Draitwge Plans L•ng Need T'ratTic Analysts Eng Need Other 0r,'27'2000 L'ng Agrer Pa}• Fces Rreeived Lng Final Piat Crrs ComplctCd C'opti to Arcuunung E:ng Agrrc Priority rcrs Rrccivrd 071 IP2000 Eng Yrelim P1:it rrrst'umplctuf hatire tu Pubiic / 1`oticc to Public # 1 3 4 6 Completed • or heeds to be signcd !)c,i_n Iki.:titi~n I)a'c> (!n-c ~,:1 n quan ats at • drainnge item catculated I'iCSfiT11; DSIC l1CctS10I1 App Ckn cun.i Appld BC'C AppcAlcd io tl(:C llecisian App Den Cand Appid ('aurt Appc:alcd !a Cuurt [?rrisiun App Den ConJ App1J - Stamped Mylars to Srs:retary (Sandy) titamprd _'QR I nt Plans to SccrtWry (SartJ}') ~ ~ t'-,jc. ENGINEER•'S ~~EN~' SIiEET ~ : ~1rti~~r AS Buitt Pintu ft"rivta Rezone File ZEi -0020-Q(} Ruad Pians Approved C'ompunion Ftlcs. ituaJ Stnnd;uds 5-I5-95 hlylnr ~ Relntai Files. Hc•:,ring: ~it39t2A00 ~+A9Quilding i)cpt: l,:;tIn1c2! Itcvic%: 07i2W2U00 i'rtiliminary Rcvicw: Type: Lnrge Lot [31dg. Square Fcct 1721r RcYesved: 07-Ii7;20i"9l P:,f,i•• t~r:•:, ['rujectNanu UR-3.5 TO t?R-22 INDFPENDErT SEN10R I.IVING 195 17f tilT tiitC Address W. CUNKI..IN, N MAIN. FS(.:[_I_IVAN, S. VALL.EI'W \1'. \p~~licanl ~ ii~n~c ;,.1:~:,;r;a• 114 - i • 11Aft( F 1.1s): ondiucxis ;Naifed: 1 i .CITI~I0ISC ~C' ~1'UitHAU(-;H ENGINEEEtlNG Flood 7.ane N.~ 131= N. titanror \t'atcrSource !'u'lli. til'UI`.ANE, We1 99201- Sewcr Soun;c Puhl;~ Sehaol Disl 3., I'hune ] C►00 Firc Dist F'h„~ : I I ; F:i~~; iSilling ONncr 12119 E. SunduHn Ur 11219 E. Sundtiu•n C): SCOKANF, wA 99206- sroxnNE:. wn I•ilanr 'Surv~}~ur i hunr Micrhell nurvca ~ 022-3575 (504) d22-3573 D1.IRYEA Sc ASSCX'Ift7FS 710 C. Glrsicrest Dr Namc. J(iRAN PCR.SQN SpOi:Atil:. tt'~~ 10205 t-..iil•.lu c H a~•i,- " ('L;i,i t•..-- ,,i; C nn(.~~: I;410-1'i-" ll:ite Submitted llescription Initi:~is Cng Nred Trchnically C'umplctr. Cng hccd Itarvard Rd [vtitigatiou Eng Nrrd Urantnge Nlans Eng Necd Trnffic Analysis E-i:L! `J._--,! (Ox: f!lt) Eng Agtrc Pny Fces Rrceivrd Eng I'innl Plnt Fcrs Cumpictrd Copy to Accounnng l=ng Agree Priurity Frrs Receivcci 47/1 lal20()0 E.rtig Prclim Plat Fces Complcted Nuitc'C 10 Puhli: ' nkQsir N+ !'.i'~~:~ ' ! ? •1 ~l',tn~!_crc! - i)r Ncrib ln be sirt;cd ~•_~1;~11 ~)t`ll~flt'1 ~.?.1L~~i~il ~~.l~i I dracriagr ium calculatrd f{eannv ()ite tkcionn :1pp Dct1 Cond Appld BCC Appealcd to l;(i 1h:ts,~un App Den Cund Arpld Court Appca{cd to Court Decisian atampcP ubylan tu SCinwq (Suncly ) , ~t:ir?i~e~ _~•'};i (.-tt PI:1Tlti !u sct'cf:.r, I ~ J y n L ~ STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING ExAMINER FII.E ZE-20-00 I SPO C~)T ~T,~ DIVISION OF PLANNING v.~ HEARING DATE: .lanuary 3, 2401 a3 1:30 p.m. FILE ZE-20-00 PROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTIQN: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3 5) t4 Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 8 acres far 172 mul#ifamily residences. Praject Data Project LoaatiQn: The subject property is generalfy located svuth of and f adjaeent to Valleyway Avenue, north af and adjacent to the unimpraved right of way of Main Avenue, and - approximately 600 fee# west of Canklin Road, in the SVIf % of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 • EV11M, Spokane County, VIlashington. Rarcel htumbar(s): 45133.1011, 45133.4901, 45133.4902 AppMicant Jeff Morse, 5tarhaug Engineering 1322 N. Monroe SpQkane, WA 99201 (509) 242-1000 Comprehensive Plan Designatian: Urban , ZontnA: Urban Residentia!-3.5 (UR-3.5) Exis#ir~g Land 1,1se: Single famiiy residence and undeveloped land. 5urrounding Zorring and l..and Uses: , • North; Zoning ta the north of the site consists of Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 9991, previously classif[ed as Agricuftural (A) in 1942 (ZE- 60-42) and Urban Residentiai-7 (UR-7) established in 1991, previously classified as Twa Family Residential (R-2) in 1970 (ZE-94-70). Land use to the narth of the site cansists of singie family residences on lots ranging from 15, 000 square feet to aver one (1) acre in size. + South: Zoning to the sauth o# the site consists of; Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) established in 1991 and previously classified as IVIuEti-Family Suburban (MFS) in 197$ (ZE-63-78), Community Business (13-2) established in 1991 and previously classified as Agricultural (A) in 1942 (ZE-60-42), and Regional Business (B-3) established in 1999 and previously classified as Commercial (C) in 1988 {ZE-7-88}. ZE-2D-OD Staff Report -.fanuary 3, 2001 Heanng 1 of 8 • ~ ~ Ldrd use to the south of the site consists of an apartment complex and commercial uses. • East: Zoning to the east of the site consists of Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) in 1942 (ZE- 60-42). Land use to the east of the site consists of single family residences on lots ranging from 20,000 . square feet to two (2) acres in size. • West: Zoning to the west of the site consists of Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) in 1942 (ZE- 60-42). Land use to the west of the site consists of single family residences on lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to over one (1) acre in size, undeveloped ' land, and the Fred Meyer retail site. Recent land use actions in Recent land use actions in the vicinity of the subject surrounding area: site include: ZE-13-00; zone reclassification from UR-3.5 to UR-22 on approximately 1.56 acres for professional offices north of the site along Broadway Ave, approved by the Hearing Examiner on October 30, 2000. ~ ZE-4-98; zone reclassification from B-2 to B-3 for general business use on property located south of the subject site, approved by the Hearing Examiner in November of 1998. ZE-68-96; zone reclassification from UR-22 to B-3 on 1.64 acres located north of Sprague Ave. and east of Conklin Ave. for those uses allowed in the B-3 zone, approved by the Hearing Examiner on May 2'd, 1997. ZE-28-93; zone reclassiflcation from UR-3.5 to B-2 retail uses on property located south of Valleyway Ave. and 250' east of Sullivan Rd., approved by the BOCC on November 2, 1993. ZE-2-91; zone reclassification from UR-3.5 to B-2 for landscaping and drainage uses on property located south of Valleyway Ave. and 700' east of Sullivan Rd., approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on March 3, 1991. PE-1797-96; preliminary plat of Valleyway Addition for the division of 4 acres into 11 lots for single family residences on property located north of the subject site, approved by the Hearing Examiner on November 5, 1996. PE-1727-93; preliminary plat of Childer's Subdivision to divide 7.66 acres into 16 lots for single family residences, on property located south of and adjacent to the subject site. Approved by the BOCC in August ZE-20-00 Staff Repon - January 3, 2001 Hearing 2of8 a L, 1994, with a limitation to 8 lots until sewer was availabte. PE-1727A-93; change of conditions to the preliminary plat of Childers Subdivision to allow the development of the approved 16 lots on sepac systems. Approved with limitations by the Hearing Examiner in October of • 1997. PE-1679-92; prefiminary plat of Armstrong Estates for the division of 10.28 acres into 30 lots for single family residenoes Iocated south of Valley Ave. and east of Conklin Rd., approved by the BOCC with modifications on May 4, 1993. ZE-42A-82; change of conditions to an existing B-3 zone to allow the administrative review of specific site development plans for property located south of the subject site, approved by the Hearing Examiner on December 29, 1999. land Division Status: The subject property consists of three tauc parcels of , record. The applicant has submitted a short plat application (SP-1262-00) for tfie subject property to the Division of Planning. Shorel(ne Destgnation: Not applicable Water Purveyor: Vera Water & Power Sewage Dispasal: The applicant is proposing to extend public sewer to serve the subiect site. Flre District Spokane County Fire Protection District #1 Plearest 14rteriel and Oistance: The site Is located adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, which is designated by 4he Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a Collector Arterial with a planned right of way width of 70 feet. In order to implement the Plan, the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads is requesting that the applicant dedicate 2.5 feet of right of way along Valleyway Avenue. In addition to the requested right of way it is recommended that a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along VaIleyway Avenue be set aside as a Future Acquisition Area (FAA). The construction of curbin.g and sidewalk is required along the Valleyway Avenue frontage. Netghborhood Association: None known ° This proposel is loceted inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA). ° This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PT6A). •This proposal is located outside of 4he 15 year Sewer Service Area. GMA/Critical Areas ZE-20-00 Staff Report - January 3. 2001 Hearing 3 of 8 , Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject property is located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overiay Zone. Fish & Witdlife Habitat Conservation Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County Critical Area Maps. Ftoodplain: The site is not located within a flood plain Geologically Hazardous Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County Critical Area Maps. Wetlands: None illustrated on the Spokane Counfy Critical Area Maps. SEPA A Determination of Nonsignfficance was issued for the proposal on December 15, 2000, with a comment period ending on January 2, 2001. Noticinq Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spolcesman Review on December 15, 2000. The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal was December 18, 2000. Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for posting public notice on the site was December 18, 2000. , , 1724 Compliance Dates Application Accepted: June 28, 2000 Technically Complete / Determination of Cornpleteness issued: October 7, 2000 Date Notice of Decision is due: February 4, 2001. Reviewinq Aaencies 11 agencies wene notified on Juty 7, 2000, and December 6, 2000. Comments were due on July 20, 2000, and December 20, 2000. Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received Received Received Spokane County Division Yes 12/21/00 Spokane Regional Yes 11/22/00 of Engineering; Health District Transportation Spokane County Division Yes 7/10/00 Central Valley Schaol No of Engineering; District No. 356 Development Services Spokane County Division Yes 12/20/00 Spokane County Fire Yes 7117/00 of Utilities Protection District No. 1 Spokane County Yes 7/20/00 Vera Water & Power No Stormwater Utility Spokane County Division No Spokane County Air Yes 1117/00 of Building & Code Pollution Control Enforcement Authority Spokane Transit Authority I No Aqency Comments: Agency comments received are in the form of recommended conditions of approval. zE-ao-oo Staff Report - January 3, 2001 Hearing 4 of 8 ~t s . . Public Comments: Comments were received from neighboring property owners expressing concems over the proposed density of the project in relafion to the existing densit}r of the surrounding neighborhood, and potential traffic impacts to nearby roadways. Description of the Site: The subject property is approximately 8 acres in size and is accessed from Valleyway Avenue. Vafleyway Avenue is a paved two lane roadway without curbs or sidewralks. The subject property is general{y flat and contains an existing residence and associated outbuildings that are to be removed prior to development of the site. The remainder of the site is undeveloped. The site is also located adjacent to the unimproved right of way of Main Avenue. Surrounding land uses include single family residences on lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to over two (2) acres in size, undeveloped land, and an apartment complex to the south. A mix of commercial uses are located south of the site along the Sprague Avenue commercial corridor, and to the west along Sullivan Road. Backqround: The existing zoning of the subject property is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991 and pneviously classified as Agricultural (A) in 1942 (ZE-60-42). The application for the proposal was submitted to the Division of Planning on June 28, 2000. A technical review meeting was held on July 20, 2000. A traffic analysis was required by the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, and was submitted , by the applicant on August 31, 2000. The traffic analysis was accepted upon review by the Division of Engineering and Roads on September 20, 2000. The application was determined to be technically complete on October 7, 2000. The Notice of Application was issued on October 7, 2000, with a 14day comment period ending on October 20, 2000. The application originally proposed the development of 192 multi-family units on 9.01 acres. A modified application for the proposal was submitted on November 11, 2000. The site is located within the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners Resolution #97-0321. Secfion S of the Resolution states that °No...zoning reclassification... shall be approved within the designated Interim Urban Growth Area unless the proposal can demonstrate the availability of public sewer service and public water service consistent with County standards. Provided, however, that lands that are not currentty sewered but are within the designated Interim Urban Growth Area and are also within the 15-year sewer projects as designa4ed in the updated Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater (Vlanagement Plan (CWMP),....may be approved...°. The subject site is located outside of the 15-year sewer project area. However, the applicant has contacted the Spokane County Division of Utllities and has requested to extend public sewer to the site. The Spokane County Division of Utilities verified on the application that the site may be served and has recommended a condition of approval requiring tfie extension of public sewer to the subject site. Staff Analvsis: Projec$ Oescription: The proposed project oonsists of a zone reclassificabon from Urban Residentiat- 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residenrial-22 (UR-22) on approximately 8 acres for 172 multl-family residences to be located withfn 12 separate buildings. Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a"citylike° environment with intensive residential uses and public facilities and services. Detailed Definition B states °Since urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categories, it is primarily a nesidential category of single family two family and multifamily along with neighborhood commercial and light industrial uses. The more intensive land uses will be located near the heavily traveled streets, while tlhe least intensive residential uses will be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic.° The recommended residenbal net density of the Urban category is from 1 zF-2o-o0 Staff Report - January 3. 2001 Hearing 5 of 8 to 17 units per acre. The net density of the proposed project is 21. 5 units per acre, which is higher than the recommended net density of the Urban category, but consistent with the maximum density of 22 units per acre, allowed within the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. Detailed Definition D states "Due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in the Urban category, few land use activities would be inappropriate." Many uses may require screening or other standards to make them compatible with one another." A number of Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines within the Urban category are applicable to the proposed zone reclassification. Goal 1.1 encourages a number of housing types and densities. Objective 1.1.a promotes fill-in development within established development areas where public facilities and services have already been established. Decision Guidelines 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 state that urban development will approved in areas having adequate urban services provided that all other Objectives and Decision Guidelines can be met. The site is located within an area of urban services including public water, schools, arterials, public transit and fire services. The applicant is proposing to extend public sewer to serve the site. Objectnre 1.1.b promotes the location of multifamily dwellings with direct or near direct access to major arterial systems and to public transportation. The site is located adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, which is identified within the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a Collector Arterial with a planned right of way width of 70 feet. Sprague Avenue, Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue are all located within close proximity to the site and are all identified within the Plan as Principal Arterials. Public transit is available south of the site along Sprague Avenue. Objective 1.1.c states that when multifamily dwellings are to be located adjacent to single family areas, careful consideration must be given to densities and design in order ~ to protect the amenities of the single famify area. The proposed density of 21.5 units per acre is considerably higher than what currently exists within the direct vicinity of the site, with the exception of the apartment camplex located to the south of the site. Decision Guideline 1.5.1 recommends the use of buffering and/or landscaping to mitigate the difference between proposed developments and existing uses. Secfion 14.806.040 of the Spokane County Zoning Code requires a strip of Type III landscaping, 5 feet in width, along all property lines adjacent to the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. The subject site is bordered on the west, east and north by the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. In addition, Section 14.622.365 of the Zoning Code requires a six (6) foot high fence, wall or solid landscaping to be constructed along the intemal property boundaries. This requirement is intended to supplement the required landscaping. Decision Guidefines 1.3.3 and 1.6.1 recammend the provision of sanitary and storm sewer for developments to protect water quality when the provision is consistent with County plans, policies and regulations. The applicant is proposing to extend public sewer to the site and storm sewers are required as part of the site development Objective 1.5.e recommends that when a neighborhood experiences pressure for a change of character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review. The proposed use is located with direct access to an arterial and within close proximity to a larger transportation networic. Multi-famify and commercial uses are gound directly south of the site along Sprague Avenue. The area south of the site has undergone a transition over the-last few years from 4hat of a mixed commercial and single family residential area to an area with general commercial uses. This same type of transition has not occurred on properdes located to the east, wrest and north of the site. The proposed use is a more intensive use than what cuRenUy exists in the adjacent areas. Required landscaping, fencing and building setbacks may help to reduce impacts to residential homes located along Valleyway Avenue. Future access to the unimproved right of way of Main Avenue may help to alleviate traffic impacts along Valleyway Avenue. Decision Guidelines 1.5.7 and 1.5.6 recommend that it be determined whether a development will enhance the residential character of an area and that structure height be taken into account when determining whether a proposal will change the exisUng character of the area. The proposed building height of 38 feet is higher than the existing height of many of the single family homes in the surrounding area and the development of the proposal may affect the existing character of the neighbofiood located along Valleyway Avenue which has changed little over tfie last ten to twenty years, with the exception of some small single family subdivisions including Valleyway zE-2o-00 Staff Repcrt - Jenuary 3, 2001 Hearing 6of8 Addition (PE-1797-93) located to the north of the site. Recent single family developments along Valleyway Avenue have net densities of 3.5 units per acre. The proposed zone reclassificabon from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category. The proposed density of 21.5 units per acre is allowed with the proposed Urban Residenbal-22 (UR-22), but considerabty higher than what exists (n the surrounding residential neighborhood. Zoning: • The purpose and intent of the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set standards for the orderiy development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values. It is intended that this zone be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities, and as an implementation tool for the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. General characteristics include having a full line of public services available including public sewer and water. The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is intended primarify for muftiple-famify dwellings and is usually located adjacent to major or secondary arterials. The proposed site is located adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, which is a Collector Arterial. Zoning in the general area of the site is primarily Urban Residentia!-3.5 (UR-3.5). Urban Residential-22 (UR-22), Neighborhood Business (B-2) and Regional Business (13-3) zoning can be found south of the site along Sprague Avenue and south of and adjacent to the unimproved right of way of Main Avenue. The proposed density of 21.5 units per acre is consistent with the density standards of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. Site Plan: , The site plan of record illustrates 12, 2 to 2%z story buildings with a maximum of 15 multi-family units each which comprise a total building footprint of 66,358 square feet The site plan identifies some units to be intended for senior housing and others for general multi-family use. Access to the site is shown at two locations along Valteyway Avenue. The site plan illustrates two gated emergency acoess points located along Main Avenue. Two recreational areas are identified with one being located near the west property line and one in the center of the site. The site plan illustrates required parking and landscaping aneas. The site plan does not illustrate a s+x (6) foot high sight obscuring fence, wall or solid landscaping along all property lines adjacent to the existing Urban Residntial-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as required by Section 14.622.365 of the Zoning Code. Site Plan Data: ' ProQOSed Required/Allowed Building Coverage 19 % 65% maximum Building Height 38 feet maximum 50 feet Landscaping Broadway Ave. 20' Type III 20' Type III Intemal property lines 5' Type III 5' Type III Building Setbacks Front yard (Valleyway Ave.) 60' from centeriine 25' from Future Acquisition Area (FAA) Side yard 5' per story 5' per story minimum Rear yard 15' 15' Parking 234 spaces 221 spaces Density 21.5 units/acre 22 units/acre The proposed site plan of record generally meets and/or exceeds the minimum development standards of the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. The site plan does not illustrate a six (6) foot wall, fence ZE-20-00 Staff Report - January 3, 2001 Headng 7of8 . , or solid landscaping as required by Section 14.622365 The front yard structure setback for the proposal shail be measured from the edge of the recommended Future Acquisition Area (FAA). Changed Conditions: Section 14.402.020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that amendments to the Zoning Map may occur when it is found that "Changes in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification.° Changed conditions in the area of the proposal may include the extension of public sewer to serve the subject property. Staff Summary: The proposed zone reclassification is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category and may implement the purpose and intent of the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. Required landscaping, building setbacks and fencing may help to reduce impacts of the proposed use on the adjacent single family residential uses. Attachments: A. Maps ~ Vicinity 1111ap ~ Site Development Plan o Comprehensive Plan o Zoning B. Conditions of Approval C. Agency Comments ' zE-2o-00 Staff Report - January 3, 2001 Hearing 8 of 8 , . ATTACHMENT A MAPS VICiNi i Y MAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ZOfVlNG MAP ZE-20m~0 VoC6011ty ~ap ~ _ . :r ~ T' ~ ' j~4`,'• ~t;"''~~. r'- ~.~4h,~ . Ji41 R ti ,'1 141(1InAinnn a~ ^A ; 12 41, 1U $alifam Jun 1'~~l i~~~r - 07 ~ - ~ 44 1 le~~;r . I#I► ~I~It VV~~.~h.rl ~ . W~ , •~dF.1t.ij1 1 U~U414 J~111~•4~ ~ c' - ~ ~ 3 • I ~ v Il I ~i Q~'~{~v Eframf~wov ~ ~ \ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ,+W . . ~ ~ I • ~ ~ . I ~ bzagif Fm m , PIL ~ °K l• ~ ~ ~(hilmhr ~t+iiitiNiU~ - ,t ~ i11111~ - - I ` ~ ~ n(IIIIIr ~ i ~ Lo4 ~~ll1 ~ . i, i . • LiN PH 24 n% I ~ ~ ~ I _ _ 5 t'lx . ' ~F.,t , • - , o` ~ II~}f~^'Ij ~ t° ' : ~ ' ~ .i~, o 1 • > ' • 't • 20, . ~ . S yJ aJ4' i ' ^ t~ tl ' ti, ~<4 j_c . - ~ ^ ,5~.~ ~ 1~ 1 ' . ~;r~ r _ _ ~i~ i j_ ~~~.~~0t :t^~'•-~ ~ ~ . ~~1~~~ ~ F. ~ _ ' • ~ ` ~ _ ' ` a i : Y'. . - ~ ' • r., , r , - , . ^.a,,~r. . . - ~r ' , • '~{yZ ~ . ' . ~ • i ~ '~m~~~. 1.^a . _"Tr,~~a"~r.1°i~, : ~.JL~~➢,.~~ 4 V'.~ . 1y k~: > ` 0" SCale :1 ~ `15~D0 k 06/2OM ' t ~ ^ . c . ~ . ~.~rr ~ ~ _e~.. ~ ' _ - - . I I _9 . ~ RQONE UR-3 5 TO UR-24 FOR ` ~ EAUr vALLEY sBUoRs IOCAiED IN 1HE SW 1/4 SEC 13 T. 25 N„ R. 44 E„ W.M. S1TE pIAN saoKANE couNnr, wnswiNCTOrr ~F REC0A0 Vu«p*., .DWTV,H I ~ ~ ( ~ ~ 0161Yp, i .79 17im ~ I y , ~ _ _ _ a - ' ~ y ~ a ~ mr~riso~ p VAEM%Vy _ _.r ~ ~~ro I ~ a _ - _ rwa~uswde~~ ~ piw~~~w~wra - - - - - - - -~s ~ - • I • a 0 MMIrLdBe ~ , o@ 1~ ~,v~~►~° p , ~ i ~ ~ , ~ . ...s~. ~ . ~ I • M _..n 063S 1ot 0 {L'1A70 OR~O ~ e m~F~ NY/0~ ml9Yi . r ' . ~ , I ~mu.~t r~wa u nra • - S » I m.a►p►~ " ~w1 ~ C AtCAfA~ION -~.•+~«..r.~~„ ~ I . ,rn► u 1 irarrms ~ A~~A e . ~ ~ ~~n~ . u A ;q. N . : , 9fE ~AT/~ ~ - - I ~ t hf n r OGm4 ID[ 111vQ,= ml{ ~ qm af Y. ~ 1 t Cr t ~ • , C= N LAOdYSCAPM ' ~ ~ W. `j v1 ~ • ~►~►rj ~ iovWM ma ~ ~ . ~ iua ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~w Q~ BI~r , •traelA~ ~ ~ OF I En6L ¢ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ SN~}1iF.o~ ~N~4N ~ I I~Q u I~ ~ Wdrl ~ ~ • ~ 11T 1I i n~~ ~ . i ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ mo ~ . 1 ~C~~; 1 qWl1 Y~ ' > ^ OCMNK Y41iY W ~ I I ~ ~ I 1 ~ u < ~ ' ~rar n wn ~ 1 W aaeu n J lx ~r■e~.~poinmara ~ •~w.~,.r.wuio~ . r¢mw~rs.u~rrt~essm ~ 6UPIOC 3Clli ~ . . • a i „~a ~ ~ Ir ' i \ / ~ ~ ~.ri,~.. ~ 7, y%. ~.pi+ ~..aJ I • - . ~ urawoqnW - ~ I~ol ~ / r~r ~ ` YANI AVENUE (tDUYPAGVED NIOIT W WAY) I e i i I i I I I i r,e ;2 u rr aroa u.a tame ensto~o 0,1 imu vew mAct 35 0°'0~D / I . uu rrw Vau m w.OW _ i ' - ~ i ~ ZEO20-Y Y Comprehenso~e Land Us~ ~~~n TF- ~ ~ - W ii~~ - 12 r - , ~ ~ I Ij~J - - i 190 - - ~ - - _ i r t ~ - " I - - _ : - I ~ - ~ ~ - - - ' 1 - ~ J1. - L-J ~ - u~.,Li_ _ ; - - - ' - - _ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ $ - ~LA UO 1{~,tl'1~I~~iJ~r1 ~~rl 1g~-`~IIuu~~ `a.f~,511 ~ ~T.,Iy~ ~~~~~I~~f~~~ U • ~ 4 ~ ali ~ - i 24' _ y Lo ' T q ~ , 5cate :1 Inch -1250 ft 06/29140 Gamprehensive land Use Plan °°OOODQO~°~ SubJect Propwrty wl#hfn IUGA. A° -SubJeat Property writhin UTA. - _ - - ; ~ ~0-00 .il _ f . '-.a. _ ~ _ . . . f 1~. 1 1-2 _ _ . 1e2 • ~ - ~ . . , ~ - . - ~ ~ *a • ,N, a~ ~ ~ '1 ■ ~ ~t ~ _ g~a ~ • • ' ~ ~ _ _ ~ , . f ~ - _ 54 u ~ . e.3 u~~•~ lb 3 1 s _ ~ R , S. UR-~2 $.3 1:. . ~ _ . - . I ► ~ " I ~ WO' 5_S ~ ~ g•~ i ~ g $ - ~ ` 22 i~ ~ ~ w-a - , = 1 ~ ; I a tc ' , ~ ` ujv~ , UFi-22 U22 u ' • ~ ►s , ~ u~~~ - ~ - --l ` ~ ~tu~►+~~~~~~~►~~i 1nt~'1 t~ i It~ ►~~~i'~ ~ ~li~i~t►~~` ~ ~~111~~'t 111~;1~ ~ J ~ t~ ~ {J~ 1~ ~~~~Ij.- u~~• f 4 ,qR-22 ~i~f_Q ~ ti IIN'\"~• UR4'6 .6 ~ ~ - ~ ~6~•~ ; . ~ ~ ~ ~ uR . ~ „v ~1. r F~,eri ~ ATTACHMENT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - - - , , , - - - - - - - - - • i j ° ~ I . REL`i09CIINOENDED"~ONDI, OI YONS FOR ZE°20'-00 ; - , ~ ~ ~ - " - - - - ~ - - - sp Om- NT- cou-~Uy --^DIVISION OF PLANNING - - - - - - - - ' - . 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residenfiai-22 (UR-22) zone and ail other applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 2. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the Director of the Division of Planning/designee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building , location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. Approvat is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permit. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as is 4he subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing BocOy or Administrative Official on January 3, 2001.9 imposing a variety og special development condit6ons. File No. ZE-20-001s available gor dnspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning. 6. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access polnts is not obscured or impaired. ZE-20-00 January 3, 2001 Public Hearing Diviston af Planning Recommended Conditlons of Approval . . 7. The Spokane County Division of Pianning shali prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The Title Notice shall state the following: a. A strip of property 12.5 feet in width from the existing right-of-way is reserved for future acquisition area for additional road right-of-way width along Valley way Avenue. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road dght-of-way and utitities. If any of the above improvements are within the area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, unit acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such °interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition. 8. The subject zone reclassification following described property: , A portion of the tract 25 and 26, Vera, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County, Washington: Beginning at the NW comer of the E'/z of Tract 26, hereinabove described; thence along the West line of' said parcel, South 00 30'29" East 612.90 feet to the North line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Spokane County for Main Avenue by Deed recorded June 23, 1958, under Auditor's File No. 54416808; thence along said Nor4h line, South 89 44'13° East 646.42 feet to the East tine of the West half of said Tract 25; thence_ along said East line, North 00 41'26" West of 613.23 feet to the Northeast comer of said West half of-Tract 25; thence along said parallel line, South 00 41'26" East 195.02 feet to a line parallel with and 195.00 feet southerly of, being measured at right angles to, the said north line of Tract 25; thence along said parallel line, North 00 35'57" West 195.02 feet to the northeast comer of said Tract 26; thence along the North line of said Tract 26 North 89 45'50" West 327.24 feet to the said true point of beginning of this description, and containing 8.00 acres of land, more or less. ZE-20-00 Jenuary 3. 2001 Public Hearing Divisfon of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval ATTACHMENT C AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS I e i . ' ' RgCEIV ED; ~,~►-~t{ANe COE~N4 Ilfl.~ ~ 4J~rrl1 . . . . r ,r-w,I,'..L, r-►F p#~,; . ~ ~ - . " Octobet 16, 2000 Spokane County Division of Planning 1026 West Braadway A,venue Spokane, Wa. 99260-0050 Froject File Number ZE-20-00 Additional studaes requested• At the traffic meeting Augvst 2, 2000 all attendees vvere informed that we would be notified af the next traffiG review based on the infonna#ion presented at that meeting. d This undated Iet#er states a traffic impact analysis was requi.red for the proposal and was reviewed and accepted by the Spokane Couaty of Engineering and Roads. This is praofthat regardless of what hameawners Frovide ar say we are totally diS3"eg3rded Sfld thi5 prOjEGt a,S w811 as PrOJect ZE-13-00 are wetl on the way f+or approval On page 3 af [etter dated October 2, 2400 to R4r. Nlichael Dempsey states Page 6, line 25 through 33 - we agree that other pmjecis are developing in the vicinity af our project. Spokane Caunty, however, 6as indicated that we were a praject of "record" prior to the other developrreents. Therefare, ovr project is not obligated to address traffic from other develvpments, new projects apgtying for d+e^velapmeet are responsible tv address otu project. The above statement is prvafthat the planning divisioa only reacts to new developments and shows no plaanfng for any portian of the Valley. With 260 parking places progosed the shortest diswce to the shopping area is dawn Maore Road. Valleyway is nat to be up,graded, city busses can not use the road so residents must have theu awn transportatian_ There are two new projects to be deveioped, one on lViain west of Adams and the other at 505 N. Pragress. A very large tlaree story apaftment is now being built on Broadway, next to Biake school with ver}r littie parking area. Fxom what can be se.en right navrr, it would be a rniracie if a ladder fire truck coutd handle a fire if it ever happemed. This would also apply to the ZE 20-240 project. Another large compiex h.as just been compieted on Evergreen aad Fourth. One questian is who will fill these apartments 4r hang the VACANCY signs. A drive to the Narth side af Spokane is an apaftment Jungle complex all with vacancy signs Knowing that the Hearing examiner uses other projects as a precedent for approving ZE20-200 and ZE13-00 it is a forgone conclusion that the projects will be approved. As I look out my dining room window at the Unsuccessful Oa.kwood estates, now mobile lots and a fire hazard weed patch, l have canceUed the $18,000 upgrade of my home we were planning. Oh, we have one choice, spend money for an Attorney which would only delay the final approval. As we look at the overall Spokane area from the parking garage, the North side apartment jungle and the hap-ha.zard hit and miss projects, the Valley wili soon look like the north side and this will make Spokane an undesirable place to live, as the people have no voice in its planning. ~ 7 Joseph and Sophia Wetkler ~ 424 N. 1Vioore Veradale, Wa. 99037-953S cc: County Commissioners Doug Floyd, Spok,esman Review Valley Chamber of Commerce , . ~ , . Octotxr 14, 20M RECEI VED SPOKANE COUNTY Spokane C;caunty I7iNtSion of !'lanntng 1026 `IX^est Broaciaay r1venue Spokane,'lk'a5hingtan 9926(}-0050 `I'o Whom lt ;11a} Concera: ~F PLA~~ING Rt:: PRO]F•.CT rILE NUIviDf R: ZC-20-00 I am tv-nttng this fetter in response to the proposad by your office to change the znning af land invcalved in iHis praject frnm UR3.5 to UR22. I am a rcsidcrit of ttits ncighborizcrod and have livcd here fof approajmately 7 years. My property is (ocatcd ncxt to the proposccl dcvcloproent and since te is, 1 a•i11 he greatly affeeted if this project goics an as planned. I liave expre-ssed m}, e«nccrns about this dcvelopment in tiic pa4t, at mectirlgs and in writing Same of mp cc}nc.erns :uc aS fo11a;y5: 'inercased traf'fie in aa arca rhat alrt}ady has strious tra($ie probltnu. I arn not sure when your traffic study was eondurted, but [ hop-e that yau have eume dara on traffrc pactern; un weekencis { and during rush hour. It is ex7remely eongesced in the arca nf Sullivan apd Vallc.yway and would become cYvcn mor+e eongested iF the 195-unit cornpfcR ts buiit lt is bkely that the peaple living therc R+auld have 1 to 3 vehicles pet untt and this would inerease traf~'ie druriatieally. In additian, to the reiidents ar the complex, theRr vi5iioss woujti a3so have an impact an traffie. ;°I'his arca has bcen rnaric up of single-farrtily r3welLngs and the neighbancood ds a quiet, cobesire, and relaiivelyTcrime frec arra. This is nne nCthe reasnns that I Chase to live herc. [f you change the zaning, openeng it up fbr mulciple fam.ily dwelGngs, property values witl derrease and nther prublems wdl foifow, (Le, mare rentals, aiore crtme, less eohesive neighbarhooris, etc). *Other issues of contern arc the number of schoal age chtldren tbat Fnay be iiving in the ccrmplek. fias anyonc considerec3 the cuirent enratlment of area sebools and bow an influx of new srucients wouid impaet that systtm.3 The locaJ juniar high and h,gh schaol are within a lnilc of the development and ttansportation is not provided by the schvol district, wliicL wi1 necessitate pr'svacc vehicle rransportation and incrrased pcde,strian traffie on roads that are essentially single lane., (i-ery VailtyR^ay, Ganltlin, and cather side stroets). 1 could gQ oa aAd Lsc athcr canccrns that all involved suould havt willi rcgards to this projcet. Unfortunacely. I do aot fecl that chese will make much of an impac.-t an your decxsioa as to whether the zoning change and project are approved. My eatpcricnce has becn that once someone deeides tltey wanc to do something like this and has the tash to bac6€ t4tc profect, it usually goes the way t-hey want ii to, reprdlcss af what negarire Canscqvences occur. An emmple nf thcs is that the zaning was already ehanged once before ig th,s area and chere tirere peopie appoccd ta chat change, buE zhei.r efforts ra retain the oId z¢ning were futile. 1 sincerely hope that you will considcr the neptive irupact that the proposcd zoning change vvould havc on the axca, the neigtytorhood and on individual property owners- S!l1CCrely, r Dan+cct Ie.Margaris F 16202 ValleywaY `Jeradalc, ti1Lra. 99037 To: Tammy Jones (Division of PEanning) CC: Frarn: Jim Red (Division,of Utilities) ,Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 SubJect: ZE-0'024-00 Stage: Heanng 'Examiner Phase: Valfeyway and Main SS09, A wet, (five) sewer connection to the area-wide Pubiic Sewer System is to be,constructed Sewer c~onnection permit 4s required Cornmercial developmenfs shall subrnit histarical and ar estimated water usage prior to #he issuance at '#he connection permit in order #o establish sewer fees - - SS12A Applicant shall submit expfessly #o Spokane Caunty Division of Utilities "under separate caver", only those plan sheets shawing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewe-r connections and facilities fpr'feview and approval Comrnercial developments shall submit historical and ar estirrtated ,water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal. S512F Sernrer plans acceptable ta the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor,to the issuance of the ~ sewer connection permit. SS15A Amangernents for payment of applicabfe sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer connection permi#. Sewer charges may include special cannection-,charges and general fiacilities charges. Charges may be subsfantial depending upon the nature of the'development WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provlded in accordance with the Coordinaied Wa#er System Plan far Spokane County, as amended. ~ . . NOV=aZ-00 12:04FM FROM-SCARCA 5994776828 T-259 P.05/07 F-740 4 . + . ~ - -0 ~ SPoKANHOuNTY .~A!R PoLCITION ~ 1:0 CDMOL Al1THORffY UHESY 7901 COLLEGE, SVfTr: 4303 o SDDKAWE. VIIA $4207 ~ 45093 4774737 Fax (509) 47'7.6928 Date: 6douerntrer 7, 2000 ~ 70: Deanna_Walterf Assaciate Planner - gppkane Couaty pivision cfPlanning 1028 W. Braikdrnray Aivenue gSpokane..WA 92260 Frorn: Ron Edgar, Chief of Tschnical Servioes RE: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR: File No. ZE-28•00 Proponene 1 Project Name: Zone reciastificatibro o UR-3.6 ¢o UR-22 on 9.01_acres for 195 residences., f Q Request far Comments an ,Nbviarraber'29. 2000_@ 1:30 . e. The following is alist of concemsrisswes that, may need to be addressed tor th;s prvject as determined from informaton received by chis affice. The list is provided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not relreve the proponens,ftarn meeting all lor.al, sWte,,andlor federal ragula#ions. For addrtronal information ar clarification, c+antact SCARGA at.(509) 477-4727. Capies of SCAPGA regulaUons are available for purchase in our offir•e or can be viewed and downlaaded from hc~p:/Avwtv.scanca.orq Goiastruction related reqiriremen4s o Qust emissions dur;ng demolinonr cDn9CfUCYl011,and excavadon prajecm must be contrnlled. This may requife the use of waeer sprays, tarps, sprinkters, or suspension of aenr,i4y during certain weather condkions. ~ 0 Measunes must be taken to avaid the depositivn of dirt and mud rtr+om unpaved surfaces anto paved suri`aces If 4taeking or spills occur an paved surfaces, measure.s must be taken #mmedlately to afean these surfaces. 0 Debds genefated m a resulE of this projed must be_disposed of by means offier than burning. Q SCAPCA strongty necommends thax a11 traveled sutfaces (i.e. ingress, egress, parking areas, acms roads, etc.) be paved and kept clean to minlmize dusg emtssions. Q If objeclianable odors resuft from 4his projM effecfive aontrol apparatus ana measures must be taicen to reduce odors w a mfnimum. AddMonal reauiremewts • ~ a ANoiioe of Gonstruaton and Application fvr Approval is required ta be sUbmitted and a,pProved by SCAPCA pMor ta the construction, instaalatan, or,eseabltshment of an air pollutivn source. This includes emergiency genemrors rated at 500 hp t375 IcM,or htgher, natuta1 gas'hea4ing equipment units rated at 4 MMB'rtJ/hr or hrgheP (inpt,p), and heating equlpment unim fireci Vdh other fuets (e.g. diesel) retad at. 1 IUiMBTUIhf (input) ar higher_ Contact SCAPGA f4r a Notae of'Conwucteort applicaton. ~ A fVapce of Inten4 must be submitted to SCAPGA prbr to any demalifian projecR or asbems projeci. An asbestos survay must be,done by an AHERR accredjted building Inspeceor phor to the dernoliUon or renovat+on of buildings eQ deeermine 'rf asbest6s-contafining matedel is ptesent at the site. Con4aee SCAPCA for a Notoe of lntent applicatian. - - - u WarYWaRn+iWFNERAL coMMEMSTaRM,do~ ~~mo cm kory~ P-vw RECEIVE[~ , , . ~~OKANE COUNa y SPC}KAhTE REGIONAL IIEALTH DISTRICT NaV 2 ? 2000 ENVtRONMENI'AL HEAI.TI-I DtVIS1ON Inter-offic;e C'arnmunic:atian DMS1ON OF PLANMNL- DATF: November 1 47 2000 ~ TO: "T'an-rmy Janes, Associate Ph.nner, Spokane Caunty Planning T3ivisian FIZOM: Stcven P. Ho y. R.S. -E14I], SRHD S[]BJECT: praposed Zone Ghange. ZE-20-00 (Sonrise Land LLC~) 1. References: ► a} 1riap of subjec#, scaie 140", hy Stortiaug Engineering, dated JLlly 24, 2400, receivcd by this office November 6. 2000. b) Rccanriaissance Geologic 1VIap of the West Half of the Spokane Quadranpie* Washington and Idaha, Allan B. Griggs, 1966. c) Soil Survey, Sqokane County, Washineton, Saii Conservatian Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1965. d) Spokane Caunty, Washinaton, Enp-ineering Interpretations, 5oi1 Conservation SeT1%1Cea LT.S.D.A., August, 1974. e} Spakane County Rules and Regulatiaas for Sevvage Dispasal Sysiems, Januar-Y 19, 1995. f) I.,ogs of water wells in Range 44,45E, Tsvvnship 25Ns Sectians 12. 13114, 1 S, and 24. g) Map; ~`rreenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spolcane N,F:., U.S.~'~.S., 1973. 2. Finciings: a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer. b) The prQject is within Criticat Vllater Supply Service Area #3, and within the serviee area af ,Vera Water arid Power Co. VVater supply wili be a public systeni. c) The groject is inside the 5pokane County Comprehensive Wastewater IVlanagement Area7 inside the fieneral Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priarity Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201' Study. The methad of sewage dispa$al is subject t4 approval ot the Director of UtiIitiesp Spokane Cvunty, pursuant to County Resolution 80.041$ adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and sails in . a . . the area are generaIly suitable for use of individual on-site s~xvage dispasal systems. The lot is of the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individLial welI and sewage system.. d) The project lies in a relatively llat area wcst of Cnnklin Rnaci anci soutll of Valley Way. Local drainage-ways are insigniecant. e} Surface soils are classed by the IJ.S. Sail Canservation Scrvice as ~'rarrison gravelly laam with a% to 5°1o slapes. fihey have a septic tan.k fiiter field liniitatian of sligh.t. I'Iiere is also possible contanzinaiion ofgroundvvater. This soil lvould be classified as a Type IV, f) Geolo(Txcaily, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in rhe area Teferetlced in section 1 f shows they are f'rom 81' to 457' deep anci have static water levels varying frnm 42' to 120' below the surface. 'T'he Vera Watcr a.nci Power Ca. has indiCated that it can supply domestic use water for #he project upon completian ai'agreements wiEh the proponent. 3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved: , a) Sewage disposal Xnethod shall be as aulhorized by lhe Director nflJtilities. 5pakvue Couiity. b) Water service shall be eaordinated througll the DireGtor of [Jtilities, Spokane C'aunty, c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when appraved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d) A public sewer systern will be made available for the project aad individuaI service will be provided to the lat p►rinr to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage dispasal systenYS shall not be authonzed. 4. Recommended Canditions of Approval: a} Use of privaxe wells and water systems is prohibited. . Director afUtilities, Spakane County Sponsor: JEFF MORSE STORHAUG EhtGINEERING 1322 N MONROE SPOKANE WA 99201 o - ~ - - ~ . s^ Y 0 • '0 ~ 0 0 ~ - - - - " . 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 , , - - ! . B 0 0 0 0 0- _ z e ~ y p ` t + ' C1 - - i I. To: Tammy Jones, Division of Planning c.e~~ ~ • & From. Scott Engelhard "Te Date: December 27, 2000 RE: Additional Conditions for ZE-20-00 Please add the following "Conditions of Approval" to the comments that I sent to you on December 21, 2000. 1. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benef~ts now or to be hereafter derived, do for themse{ves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the fomnation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. . s t If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of fonnation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment rotl; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. ~r It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Main Avenue. 2. The County Engineer has designated a Local AccessRoadway Section for the improvement of Main Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. o P2ge 2 o • , . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: December 21, 2000 PROJECT: UR-3.51'O l!R-2211VDEPENDEIVT SR LIVING 195 UNITS F1LE ZE-0020-00 Hearing: 011032001 @ 9:00 Sponsor/Applicant: JEFF MORSE Section Township Range: 13-25-44 Planner: TAMMY JONES Technical Review Date: (07/20/2000 @ 2:15) r' The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Peior to issteance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction vvd$h a County Road P'rojectlRoad Improvernent District, whichever comes first: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for right of way. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 2. A traffic study has been accepted by the County Engineer for this proposal and is valid until December 31, 2005. Shou{d there be substantial changes in the site design or not completed by December 31, 2005, the County Engineer may require updated traffic infomnation to be submitted and additional mitigation may be required. 3. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be_ in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion- of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles CC: Applicant JEFF MORSE Enqineer/Surveyor MITCHELL DURYEA Planner TAMMY JONES e Fage 2 , • 11/29/2000 Hearing / Review / 07/20/2000 TR 2E-0020-00 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accompiished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valleyway Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphait along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 8. Direct access to Main Avenue is prohibited until authorized by the County Engineer. The applicant is advised that any access to Main Avenue shall require frontage improvements to Main Avenue constructed to a Local Access Roadway Standard. Frontage improvements along Main Avenue would require 32 feet of asphalt and the installation of curbing and sidewalk. The improvement's to Main Avenue would also require off-site strip paving to the intersection of Main Avenue and Conklin Road. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless othenrvise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-844JO-as amended and are applicable to this proposal. oz(V5 11. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been essued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior 4o the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valleyway Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required dgh4 of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valleyway Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valleyway Avenue. ~ ' - ; Page 3 , . . 11/29/2000 Hearing / Review / 07I20/2000 TR ze-oozo-oo 14. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant. shouid check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is respons+ble for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 15. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for any portion of the property, the applicant shall enter into a Devefopment Agreement with the Spokane County Engineer for off- site mitigation to the Sullivan Loop Ramp, which this proposal impacts. Estimated construction date of the Sullivan.Loop Ramp is spring of 2001. END , ~ ,o . - - - - - - - ~ • - - M E U1911 0 R A N D ~ ~ ' , • • DATE: July 20, 2000 TO: Tammy Jones, Divisi .of Planning i~ FROAfl: - Vr n lms and V gini~SarAe , P.E., Stormwater Utility RE: ZE-20-00 CC: File This proposai lies within the Spokane-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer sensitive area (ASA). The Guidelines for Stormwater Management require that all impervious area within the ASA must drain to grassed percolation area (gpa) swales for water quality treatment, provided that the soils are acceptable. The applicant has indicated that swales will be used for stormwater runoff, which meets the intent of the Guidelines. Prior to finalization of this project, the applicant should show the location of the drainage facilities on the project plans. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. ~ 11P0SEID0N15tOrm%StOrmlDe.5lgn Rev18w CCmment61s82000 doc r ~ ~ ~ ~ r►" ~ f CI ~Cc t fJ ~ ~ r~.cl LL (='"a ~ r srO o L.J t I( l ~r 4L~= r ~ ~ C)Al i ~ 4 ~ ~ q f ck ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~eAl ~ , ~ . ~ • • . County Public Works, Transportation • • Section, D • o County • . Memo To: Michael Dempsey, Hearing xaminer From: Scott Engelhard, Di ' ngineering and Roads Date: January 11, 20 RE: Status of S agu enue/Conklin Road Traffic Signal In the public hearing for ZE-20-00 held on January 3, 2001, you asked why this proposal was not required to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road after receiving public testimony that previously approved development proposals in the vicinity were required to do so. I have researched the previous proposals and submit the following: PE-1750-94/PUDE-4-94, ZE-29-96 and ZE-68-96, all of which areLand Use Applications submitted by Buster Heitman, have an Engineering Condition of Approval to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. In PE-1750-94/PUDE-4-94, construction of the traffic signal was to occur at such time the Sprague/Conklin Intersection met traffic signal warrants per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In ZE-29-96 and ZE-68-96 construction of the Sprague/Conklin - traffic signal was to occur commensurate with the CRP 2676, which constructed Sprague Avenue from Sullivan Road to Tschirley Road. Prior to construction of CRP 2676, signal warrants had still not been met per MUTCD. Therefore, to prevent future disturbance to the intersection pavement, electrical conduit and junction boxes were installed with the CRP in anticipation of the signal being constructed. Per the traffic study, with the inclusion of ZE-20-00, the Level of Service (LOS) for the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin Road is not failing and is LOS D. The applicant was required to perform a signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin Road and none of the 13 warrants as specified in MUTCD. When a signal warrant analysis is performed it provides a"snapshot" of current traffic conditions using actual ground traffic counts and does not forecast future traffic volumes. ! ~ , . . . After further review of previous land use proposals in the surrounding area and the traffic study prepared for this proposal; Spokane County Engineering finds that this proposal contributes 2.4% of the total intersection v me in the "build-out" year of 2005. Aithough the traffic study shows the LOS is not failin w0tsignal warrants are not met, this equates to a contribution of $3600.00 for a typical s al system valued at $150,000.00. The following Condition of Approv itted to the record for ZE-20-00: I Prior to the release of a buildi pe the applicant shall contribute a pro-rata share for the installation of a traffic signal at tersection of Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road. The traffic signal shall be installed when signal warrants are met per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The estimated share of this cost is $3600.00 and shall be paid to the County Engineer. • Page 2 - RECE VED • ' HO V 21 2000 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER f . V S F' C7 K , C U U N `T' Y [7fvl5ic)N 01- PI.ANN1NG. A U(VL510N OF THE PUBI.IC WORKS DE7'A1z'iME:M' MICHAE•-i. V. Nf:i:Ui{:;ti1, O1hI=C"1'ov GARl' OBL•RG, DiRFiTC~R MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard c/o of Sandy Kimball Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry ~ Firc District No. 1 h FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner ` DATE: November 21, 2000 SUBJECT: ZE-20-00 Attached is a revised site plan for a proposed zone reclassification, ZE-20-00. The revisions include a reduction of the number of proposed units from 195 to 172 and a reduction in the size of the subject property from 9.01 acres to 8 acres in size. Please update your records. If you have any questions, please contact me at 477-7225. C: Sonrise Land, LLC Storhaug Engineering 1026 W. BROADWA1' • SF't7KAtv'L•. Gti'A4HiNi,`TOi` 99260-0220 PHONF: (5f19) 477-7200 • FA\_ !5l?91 477-2241 • TT717' 477-711-1 _J t<:> TransQortatron and Trafhc fngineenng PLANNING•UfSfGN ~?-?-%-~s--~ RE~~tV ED The 0 C T 2 4 2000 T~'Swju ~RIKANE COUNTY EPiG1tEER G* A6/A E IGII ~R A 1tl D V 1Pll T0: Steve Stairs DATE: October 17, 2000 FROM: Bill White TG: 00121.00 Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: VALLEY WAY RESID!_--.:NTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ~viv~LJ~i0 iy v- i i~iv Sr"'vR i~ i ivi-~- 1ivirH~ i HI~HL 1' JEJ The Transpo Group, Storhaug Engineering, and the Project applicant appreciate your involvement in the public traffic-scoping meetuig for the Val.ley Way Residential Praject on Valley Way east of Conklin Road. This memoi-andum describes the influence of residents at the public meetulg and summarizes the conclusions of the 7y-ansportahon Impact A►zalysis conducted by The Transpo Group for the develonment. Public Meeting As you knoal, a public traffic-scoping meecu-ig ntas hosted by the project teaxn in mid-Aug.ist. The site owners a_nd Storhattg Engineering introduced the prQject and ci--scussed the averall site proposal. Transpo disctissed Iu2own traffic issues and identified praject trip generataon base7d upon prelim.inary anal}•sis anci correspondeneP with Spokane County. The public was encQUraged to participate in this meeting, arad loca.l resiclents provided information that was usefu] in establishing the overall scope for the -Transportation Impacf Analyses (71A). The following are issues that were addressed in the TIA as a result of public involvement: o Trip Generatiom. Site-generatecl traffic was originaUy developed with thP use of the 7 , 'a-. a 1.' T ' ^ 1 , r ' _ • 1 • - - a.iiSlsdlall: ~!1 L'.:aulv~,a.. 1+:1.% v..~tGl4lr~ i aa~.La~.ai C'unU J 1• 1J ~luVialiG~~t'is kli_-:i :•!C,IC11L15U clL the public meeGr,g. Ceneral _pubuc consensus was that ITE trio generation v►►as insufficient for the area. r1 triP generation anal}rsis a•as conducted at similar sites in the Spokane/Coeur d'Alene area and this information was used to estaolish tnp generation of the proposed project. a 1'rip D'astribution. Prelimir,ary site unp distribution was presented at the meeting and it was generally felt that toa muc;li traffic was proposed to utilize Valle}. Way west of the site. Adjustments were made in the analvsis to accounc for local knowlec3ize oi patterns. a Moore Street. Several concerns were expressed over the potential fo; cut-thr•ougli traffic on Moore Street. The inte'secaon of Broadway Avenue f MoorE Street was added to the analysis to assess the potential for cut-through traffic. The TFtANSPO Group, Inc. 176 S. Stevens Street, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99201 509/462-0606 FAX: 509/747-3317 r- s • Steve Stairs The . October 17, 2000 ~spo Pa,ge 2 Tra Group o Valley Way. There was concern over the ability of Valley Wa}• to accommodate site- generated trips. An analysis was conducted to address these concerns in the traffic study. Traffi'c Impact Analysis The Traffic Irapact Analysis was submitted to Spokane County in late August, approxunately two weeks after the public trafiic-scoping meeting. Additional/supplemental information was suppLeci 'oy mr.morwiuun7 in miet-~eprernc,er at -cne : equesr of d-i:: ,uunty. The traff'ic analysis assessed tralffic conditions du.ruig the existing, future 2005 w-ithout- project, and 2005 with-project PM peak hours. The analysis was conducted utilizing methodalogy that was approved by Spokane CountST and the project team coorcbnated with local residents while developing the scope for this project. The results/conclusions of the TiA are as follows: o Trip Generation and Distribution. Based upon area trip generation studies, the Valley Way Residential Project would generate approximately 1,750 daily trips and 114 PM peak hour trips. Thesp trips wei•e distributed fo the study area for analysis based upon local kno«►]edge•and the trafi-ic patterns established through existing counts. It should be noted that counts at Broadway Avenue/Moore Street llave indicated that less than 20 vehicles enter/exi.t Moore Street from Broadway Avenue during the PM peak hour. To address pubLic concern, some traffic was assigned to Moore for the operational analysis, even though traffic counts would suggest that this route has minisnal usage as a cut-through arterial. - o Operational AnaYysis. An operations analysis was conducted at the intersections of Broadaay Avenue/Sullivan Road, Broadway Avenue/Moore Street, Broadway Avenue/Conkl.in Stceet, Valley- Watir/Conklin Street, and Sprague Avenue f Conklin Street. T'he analysis was performed according to Spokane County guideluies and concludecJ that -sufficient caaacity Hras available La accommodate prqlect traffic at these inte*sectic►ns. The ana1S►sis also ioncludes that average vehicle ciclay ex-perienced by the typical dnver at most of the study intersections would inGrease bSl less than a second. The analysis indicates that the longesc average incarease in waiting time would potentially occur at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/ Conklin Road and the i.ncrease was determineci to be less than 3-seconds. m Capacity of Valley Way. SPakane County defines Valley Wa3t as a Collector Arterial that has a practical capacit}r of 7,000 veliicles per day. Based upon accepted traffie forecasts and trip generation data established locally, approximately 3,400 veriicles would utilize Valley Wav an a typical weekda1• in year 2005. Txus is well below the practical capacity threshold defined by Spokane County, which suggests that the arterial lias sufficient capacity for groath. o Sprague Avenue/Conklin Road. The Shelly Lakes development is responsible for the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin ..r► • ` Steve Sta.irs October 17, 2000 Page 3 Road, as-warranted by Spokane Counq-. A preluninary signal warrant (need) analysis was conducted in the Val.ley VVav Residenbal T1A to assist the Count_y %%'ith their planning efforts. Based upon accepted methodologies a.nd the traffic forecasts highlighted in the TIA, the signal would not be wan-a.nted by 2005 with the construction of the Valley Way project o Impact Fees. Spokane County and the Washington State Departrnent of Transportation (WSDOT) are constructing improvements at the Interstate 90/Sullivan Road Interchan~.;e. The project would contribute to construction, based iipnn e-,tahlir:hec? t^p;r-:?arF rees. Summaf y The Valley Way Residential Transportation Impaci Analysts was scoped through a collaborative effort of the project team, local citizens, and Spokane CountST. The analysis was conducted utilizulg the appropriate methodologies accepted under 'Spokane County guideluies. The results inclicate that the project would not significuntlJ imivact traffzc conditions within the idenhfied study/scope area. Spokane County agrees with this assessment and indicates that they w-illl provide technica] approval for the study. Since tUere are not signif icant impacts to report, fihis memorandum has been sent as a courtesy in place of the second public meeting. The Transpo Group, Storhaug Engineering, and the project applicant would like to thank youu again for your involvement iu this process. `'ou can re-tiew the traffic study and the supplemental addendum at Spokane County Plannuig on West Broadway Avenue north of the Spokane River in dotitntown 5pokane. M,0iri00121100121 M3 ' , . . I - - - _ ~ - - o e , ~ o o , e _ ' - - ' , e o e e o 0 , D o 0 0 VI • I ~ ~ ~ To: Tammy Jones, Division of Planning From. . Scott Engelhard Date: December 27, 2000 RE: Additional Conditions for ZE-20-00 Please add the following "Conditions of Approval" to the comments that I sent to you on December 21, 2000. 1. Appiicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution, method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. 1 1 1 ~if a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RI D is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Niain Avenue. 2. The County Engineer has designated a Local AccessRoadway Section for the improvement of Main Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. o Page 2 ~ . , OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ° 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 - - - _ . _ . - _ . _ _ - - - - - _ _ "EtVGINEER'S CONDITIOIVS OF APPROVAL" ZONE TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: December 21, 2000 PROJECT: UR-3.5 TO UR-22 INDEPEfVDENT SR LIVING 195 UNITS FILE ZE-0020-00 Hearing: 011032001 @ 9:00 Sponsor/Applicant: JEFF MORSE Section Township Range: 13-2544 Planner: TAMMY JONES Technical Review Date: (07/2012000 @ 2:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to issuance of a building permit or at 4he request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for right of way. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 2. A traffic study has been accepted by the County Engineer for this proposal and is valid until December 31, 2005. Should there be substantial changes in the site design or noi completed by December 31, 2005, the County Engineer may require updated traffic information to be submitted and additional mitigation may be required. 3. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, Iocation and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles CG • Aaolicanc JEFF t-tORSE Ec:gxneer/5urveyor MITCHELL DIIRi+FR Plannex T?a2•LMY JONES ! Paae , 2 11/29/2000 Rearsr►g / Review / 07/20/2000 TR 'LE-4020-QO 6. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valleyway Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.'5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 8. Direct access to Main Avenue is prohibited until authorized by the County Engineer. The applicant is advised that any access to Main Avenue shall require frontage improvements to Main Avenue constructed to a Local Access Roadway Standard. Frontage improvements .along Main Avenue would require 32 feet of asphalt and the installation of curbing and sidewalk. The improvements to Main Avenue would also require off-site strip paving to the intersection of Main Avenue and Conklin Road. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge constru'ction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 11. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valleyway Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valleyway Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Valleyway Avenue. A • 1 Page 3 11/29/2000 Hearinq / Review / 07/20/2000 TR zE-oo20-oa 14. The appiicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, inciuding property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County wil) assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and ta make arrangements for any necessary work. 15. 'Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for any portion of the property, the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Spokane County Engineer for off- site mitigation to the Sullivan Loop Ramp, which this proposal impacts. Estimated construction date of the Sullivan Loop Ramp is spring of 2001. END Kimbail, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 8:54 AM To: Jones, Tammy Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda, Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John; Little, Colleen Subject: ZE-20-00 - Valley Seniors Center 11-06-00 I received ttiis proposal on November 3, 2000. I consider the application to be technically complete. I do not require a concept drainage plan for this proposal. I know of no critical areas on this site. I recommend the following condifiions of approval: Please use the current standard condition for drainage. Bill Hemmings, PE 1 1 - ' . , ; ~ S P O K A N E ~ ~ C O U N T Y DIV1S1c)V OF PI.ANNtNG A DNLSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DFJ'ARTM •L'MT MICHAT:I. V. NL•'EDHAM, UIRf?C T'C)R GAKY OHERC:, nIRF<T()K MEMU1Zt1NULTNi TO: Spokane County Uivision of Engineering & Roads; Sc;ott EngelharcJ, clo Sand". Kimball Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Bill I temmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderbv SQokane County Division of Building &('ode Fnf',rcel»c:iit; Jeff Fc,rrv Fire District No. 1 ~ Vera Water District FROM: Tammy Jones, Associatc Planner DATF.: Novcmber 1 2000 S[ iBJECT: IE-?(►-t)l) Ylease see the attached revised site plan of record. No comments are requested. 1026 w. BKOADWAY • spoxMrE, wASK24croN 99260-ouo F'NONF.: (509) 477-7200 o FAX: (509) 477-2293 9 TDD: (509) 477-7131 J RECEIVED 'D E C 0 6 2000 SPOKANE COUIYTY ENGINEER S C O U N T N' UIVISI()N ()F I'lANti1Nl: A D(VIS1(-)N OF TFfE PUBL[C WORtLS DE}'AitTMEN-l MICHAFI. V. NEEDHAN1, DIRFCI'OR GARY OBF.RG, D[RrCTC)R MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane County Division of Enginccring & Roads; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities;lim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Fom• Spokane Transit Authority Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Central Valley School District #356 Fire District No.l Vera Water & Power FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Ptanner DATE: December 6, 2000 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of January 3, 2001 @ 1:30 pm FILE ZE-20-00 DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential- 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential - 22 (UR-22) on approximately 8 acres for 172 multifamily residences. STR: 13-25-44 T. MorselStorhauf- M SFxA; Q - R",i a;'~..!' Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review and return any comments to me by December 20, 2000.. Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASH[NG'POiN 99260-0220 PHOM?: (S(19) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2241 • TDD: (5(14) 477-7133 NOT'ICE OF PUBLIC HEi ARING SPOKANE COiJNTY HEA.RING E lER TO: All interested persons, and owners/iaxpayei•s within 400 feet H O V L'LilJ4:~ HEdlEDY NOTHH' THA1 A i Q./BLIC 11L' tiltil\'lT W1LL Dsi HE LD O1\ TiY A`, LAN1) USE APPLICATION L,ISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOVVS: Application: File No. ZE-20-00 Zone reciassification from Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential - 22 (UR-22) on approximately 8 acres for 172 multifamily residences. Parcel Nu.: 45133.1011 Hcaring IDate and Time: January 3, 2001 @ 1:30pm Place: Commissioners Assembly Room; Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, VVashington. Owner: Sonrise Land LLC, 11219 E. Sundown Dr., Spokane, WA 99260 Applieant: Jeff MorselStorhaug Eng., 1322 N Monroe, Spokane, WA 99201 (509)242-1000 Address And Locatian: Generally located soutti of and adjacent to Valleyway Ave., north of and adjacent to the unimproved right-of-way of Main Ave. and approximately 600 feet west of Conkli.n Road. Co~prehensiwe Piao: Urban Zoning Designation: Urban Residential - 3.5 (LTR-3.5) Environffiental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the Couaty Division of Planning, as the lead agency on December 15, 2000. The comment period ends January 1, 2001. Relatcd Pefl-mflts: N/A Division of Planning Staff: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7200 HEARING EXAVMCi R PgtOCEIDURES . r e$8~~~ ~:~~~dr'S: ~~1~;~.1~•r_ i' ' k'~.'.: ~.a^.•z:.'es proceclure adop~.~ - _ ~ Spokaae County Resolution No. 96-G-294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and ffiay svbmit written caanments aad documents before or si the hearing. T"he Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established Uefore the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to Coueity Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to persons witb physical disabilities. Inspecdon of File, Copies of Docannents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report,and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Planning, V Floor Pemait Center, Public QVorks Building, 1026 W. Broadway, . Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. aad 5:00 p.m., weekdays,lVl-F, except bolidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special , needs,-please call the Division at (509) 477-7200: Send written comments to die Spokane County . - I~it~iS9~~;0~'.~P1A.~~13~v_;_~(~~~~.W-,~~Ad~^AV,~f9;r,k~i;P~ ~1~~~..49~.~f1: ~Attn: _,'g'A.~~ii~rf~4Y18,S.AtlmtiO~LS li~~~ . ',"=f - ,T : < , • . , " : - , - rr, ~ ' tiP , .,j . ,.r r' - ` M t~:~ ' t i ' ~ • -v,4 • ~y ~ r - . ~ T~,- _r~~~•~;~ t~' ~~ii'`•'3 , 6ub~tc ;}1-~~~ ~fjr~~ ~``,~r"v ;r~% v h uf - :i.;w a~' + , , c: ,j • 'Ar~1.Y~a r~~ -t 4 t.~•~'}c~ p ~/yJ~ jy~~,• tyc,fe;._ r , _ J~'yt:'~ . r ~a■ ~n ~~V, ~f7~i:~ If ~ . yl. _ D r, T<` ~M.. Y•- y µ~~r~~i I ~ ~i . F te • ' 7 ^ . , t -J' Z ~ `i; ^w ♦ ~y !a^ _ _ I1•• ,.,2~.~., - f"..`'{:'r`iw~ irJP ;~",Q.~~j'C ;~Y~yr~'i... i~~~ 0~,~.~.lY..y5 ~ ."J.(1~`2'~,.Y~1~~'C~~1~:.7;. .j;`r ~ :~yt.~L~`~.~„•,~~`di`-~>`V~f~tr . , - . ' . "~C . DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER ZE-20-00 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 'Lone reclassification from Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential - 22 (UR-22) on approximately 8 acres for 172 multifamily residences. HEARING DATE AND TIME: January 3, 2001 @ 1:30 APPLICANT: Jeff Morse/Storhaug Eng., 1322 N Monroe, Spokanc, WA 99201 (509)242- 1000 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located south of and adjacent to Valleyway Ave., north of and adjacent to the unimproved right-of-way of Main Ave. and approximately 600 feet west of Conklin Road. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined t}hat it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issu4d (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later t6an 5:00 p.m., January 2, 2001, if t6ey are intended to alter t6e DNS. All comments should he sent to the contact person tisted below. -RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tammy Jones Title: Associate Planner Spokane County Division of Ptanning 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0220 (509) 477-7200 DATE ISSUED: I~, 2000 SIGNATURE: ~ - OOIATIS RFG~ARDING FNVIROI~IIv~TTAL OC~NCERNS ARE WII~C~O~ViE 4AT 2 HMEMRIlNG. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANL COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Departrnent of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transportation Engineering; Scott Engethard 3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; Bill Hemmings 4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 5. Spokane Counry Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims 6. Spokane Regional Health Districi; Steve Holderby 7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry 8. SQokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer 9. Fire Protection District No. l 10. Central Valley School District #356 11. Vera Water & Power 1 ` ~ r. r S P O K A N U: C (D U N T Y DlVltil()N UF I'LANNiNC; A UIVISION Of THE PLlF31_IC WORKS DEPAKTMF.Ni' M}C11.4[L V. NFFDf1AM, DIF{EC'R)K GARY OB"c, DIRECPOR MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard c/o of SantlN Kimball Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Urilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Fire District No. 1 Central Valley School District No. 356 Spokane Transit Authority Spokane County Air Pollutic>n Control Authoritv FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Public Hearing; ZE-20-00 The public hearing for ZE-20-00 originally scheduled for November 29, 2000 @ 1:30 p.m, has beea rescheduled to January 3, 2001. If you have any questions, please contact me at 477-7225. iM6 W. eitoAnwwY • sPOxwM wA%McroN 9926a-orio PtiONF' (S09) 477-720() 0 FAx: (5(19) 477-22+3 • T'[)f)- 477-71TA RECEVED , , NOV 0 1 2000 ~ SROKANE COUNTY ENGINEEA , SP c~ ~c A N r- C o u N T Y DNLSION UF PlllhivWi: A DrvtsioN or• n-E PvguC WoRxs Dcr,4xzMExr MICHAGi. V. [VF•.FDI-tAM, DIRECTOR CAKN' OBEFtG, DiRFCT(1R MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Fire District No. 1 Vera Water District Central Valley School District #356 Spokane Transit Authority Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner ` DATE: November l, 2000 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of November 29, 2000 @ 1:30 p.m. FILE ZE-20-00 DESCRIP'TION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 9.01 acres for 195 multi-family residences. STR: 13-25-44 APPLICANT: Jeff Morse/Storhaug Engineering, 1322 N. Monroe, Spokane WA 99201, 509/242-1000 Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review and return any comments to me by November 14, 2000. Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing I 1026 W. BROADWAY • SP'OKANE, WASHINCIiON 99260-0220 . . , - , . . . _ . . _ . . . . _ _ . N0'I'BCE OF I'UBLIC HEARING SP0KANE COUN'TY HEARING EXAMIN]EIZ T'O: All iiiterested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet YOU A.ItEi HERE BY NO'I'IFIED 'i'H.A'T A PUBLIC BEi ARING WILL BE tIELV O1V 'I'HE LAND USE AI'PILICATIOlV LISTED BEI,OW, AS FOLLOWS: AppVcatiion: File No. ZE-20-00; Zone reclassificatian from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 9.01 acres for 195 multi-family residences. IIearing Date and Time: November 29, 2000 @ 1:30 p.m. PBace: Comm.issioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadvvay, Spokanc, Washington. Owner: Sonrise Land, LLC, 11219 E. Sundown Dr., Spokane, WA 99206 Applicant: JefflViorse/Storhaug Engineeriag, 1322 N. Monroe, Spokane WA 99201, 509/242-1000 Address and Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, norkh of and adjacent to the unimproved right-of-way of Ma.in Aveiiue and approximately 600 feet west of Conklin Road in the SW %d of Section 13, Tovvnslup 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Compcehensive ]Plan: Urban Zonfmg IDesignation: Urban Residential-3.5 (tJR-3.5) Esavironffientsil Determina4ion: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the Caunty Division of Planning, as the lead agency on November 9, 2000. The comment period ends November 27, 2000. Y)avision of Plaanning S#affi. Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7200 HEARING EXAIVELPTER PItOCEi IDURES Heaaing Proeess and Appeal.s: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All i.aterested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or ai the hearing. The Hearing Exaaniner may limit the time given to spealcers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County IZesolution Nos. 96-0171. Enviroamental appeals wiR follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. A11 hearings will be conducted in faciiities which are accessible to persons with physical disabilifiies. Inspection of File, Copies of I)ocaYnent.s: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Reporl and application fiIe may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Planning, V Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 am. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477•7200. Send written comanents to the Spokaae Couaty Division of Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Temmy Jones/ZS-20-00. ARotions must be made in writin.g and stibmitted to the Spokane County Hearing Ex,aminer, 3' Floor, Public Works Building,1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245. r i O 0 Q I e Q ~ _ • _ " i ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~O y i p o ~v,~ o o : eV t \:.lJ . _ ~ . • O y 0 J ~ ' 0 ' ' • 1 ~ • i 0 / To: Spokane County Planning Planner: TAMMY JONES From: Scott Engeihard ~-or (""41 Subject: ZE-0020•00 UR-3.5 TO UR-22 INDEPENDENT SR LIVING 195 UNITS Technical Review Date: 07/20/2000 @ 2:15 Applicant: JEFF MORSE Date: July 20, 2000 RE: Technical Review After review of, ZE-0020-00 UR-3.5 TO UR-22 INDEPENDENT SR LIVING 195 UNIi"S Spokane County Transportation Engineering Section is requesting a traffic analysis scoped by Spokane County Engineers. We have reviewed the traffic distribution letter submitted by The Transpo Group for the above referenced proposal. Comments were submitted to the applicant seeking additional information, which has not been submitted for review at this time. Additional comments will be provided at such time the letter is submitted for review. This application is not technicaliy complete at this time. Thank you for your consideration in this matter r Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sen4: Monday, Juty 10, 2000 7:38 AM To: Jones, Tammy Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg Subject: ZE-20-00 - Sonrtse Land LLC 7-10-00 I received this proposal on July 7, 2000. I consider the application to be technically complete. I do not require a concept drainage plan for this proposal. I know of no critical areas on this site. f recommend the following conditions of approval: Please use the currenl standard condition for drainage. BiII Hemmings, PE Page 1 rAGE, 1 11:33:20 10 JUL 2000 Raad# Road Names MPost. Rdfererice'Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 05110 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 FANCHER RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV .150 UPRR CROSSING U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 .160 LAKE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 .250 EASTERN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 DYER RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24 OS~Il VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 PARK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY AV .230 ELLA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .360 DICK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .480 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 20 .530 MESA LN (PVT R.D ) U 17 PAVED 20 .610 BESSIE RD U 17 PAVED 20 .740 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 20 .860 MARGUERITE RD U 17 PAVED 18 .920 HUTCHINSON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 18 .990 ARGONNE RD U 17 PAVED 40 1.050 MULLAN RD U 17 PAVED 20, 1.120 WILLOW RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.240 LOCUST RD U 17 PAVED 1.380 FARR RD U 19 PAVED VALLEYWAY AV (END) 1.490 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PRVED 05112 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 WALNUT RD U 19 PAVED 2 VALLEYWAY AV .060 HERALD RD U 17 PAVED 20 .190 FELTS RD U 17 PAVED 20 .310 RAYMOND RD U 17 PAVED 2C .440 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20 .510 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 2C .690 PIERCE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 2C .790 S KI PWORTH RD ( STAR.T ) U 17 PAVED 20 .940 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 2G 1.010 BATES RD (STAR.T) U 17 PAVED 3 ~ 1.190 UNION RD (END) U 17 PAVED ~ 1.450 SR 27 (PINES) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 1.840 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 1.950 MCDONALD RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ 2.110 MCCABE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. : 2.200 BLAKE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 2.310 MAYHEW ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ 2.360 MAMER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. VALLEYWAY Av (END) 2.470 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 05113 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ VALLEYWAY AV .110 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 2.. .160 BANNEN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ .170 BANNEN RD ( END ) U 17 L I GHT B I TUM . .250 BEST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. .260 BEST RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. .300 REES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BIT'UM. 2-: VALLEYWAY AV ( END ) .500 P,DAMS RD U 17 L I GHT B I TUM . 2_ 05114 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. VALLEYWAY AV .120 BURNS RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. . .150 BURNS RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ .250 PROGRESS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. : .390 SOMMER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ .500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. .770 MOORE RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. .840 SONOR.A RD(NONESTABLI U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 4 1.000 CONKLIN R.D U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ i, 1 Fn C~-~AM??(lr'~,' (N()1~T7QTA.T?T,T TJ 1;► TTrHT RTTTTM. VALLEYWAY AV (END) 1.500 FLORA RD U 17 LIGNT B?TUM. 20 05115 VALLEYWA Y AV ( S'I'ART ) . 0 0 0 HAR.N101T`.~ RTj (ET\Til ) U 19 PAV ED 40 PACE 2 11:33:21 10 JUL 2000 Road# Road Names.......... Mpost. Reierericebescriptio Road Log Ir.io.......... VALLEYWAY AV .100 MCMILLAN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 .130 yiCMS LLAN CT ( START ) U 19 PAUED 40 V.ALLEYTrJAY AV ( FND ) .320 HOUGES RD U 19 PfiVED 40 J 511 o VALLEYWP.Y AV ( LI BERT .000 WES`?' END TO NICKINZ I E R 09 PAVEi7 40 VALLEYWAY AV .020 MCK TN2I E DR ( END ) R 09 PAVED 40 .080 GARRY DR (END) R 09 PAVED 44 .190 MAIN AV ( T I BERTY LA.K R 09 PAVED 40 .270 MITCHELL CT(LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 .330 MITCHELti DR (EiND) R 09 PAVED 40 .390 MOLTER RD R 09 LIGHT BTTUM. 22 1. 0 5 0 DUNBARTON L~.V (PVT RD R 09 LI GHT B I T[JM . 22 VALLEYWAY AV (FND) 1.2,80 LAKESIDE RD (END) R 09 LiGHT BITUM. 20 05117 VALLEYWAY CT ( START ) .000 LA-BERRY DR U 19 PAVED 37 VALLEYWAY CT (EIVD) .l,OG EAST END OF ROA.D U 19 PAVED S7 8 Records Frocessed PAGE l 11:33:51 10 Ti3L 2000 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Rdfereriee'Dascriptio Road Log Info.......... 02939 MAIN AV (STP.RT) .000 HARRINGTON AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. la MAIN ?1V .030 BESSIE RD (ENU) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 .060 BESSIE RD U 19 z IGHT BTTUM. 18 .160 SA-RGENT R..D U 19 L I GHT BITUM. 18 .290 NLARGUh"RITE RD U 19 LIGHT BITt1M. 18 .350 HUTCHINSON RD U 19 LIGHT BITUtiI. 18 MA TN AV (END ) .410 A.RGON~.TF RD U 19 L I GI3!' B I TUM . 18 02941 MAIN AV (START) .000 HERALD RD U? 9 LIGH`! BI'I'UM. 30 MAIN AV .120 FEL'I'S RD ( START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .180 BALFOUR RD ( END ) U 19 L I GHT B T TUM . 20 .250 RP YMOND RD U 19 L I GHT B I TUM . 20 .370 UN.iVERSIIY RD U 19 LIGHT BITU-M. 20 .440 VAN MARsER RD (START U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 . 5G0 GIT LIS tZD (END) IJ 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .520 PIERCE RIa (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .670 MQFFITT RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 MAIN AV (END) .690 MOFFIT LN (PVT LN) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 .750 SKiPWORTH RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 02943 MAIN AV (STARs ) .000 WILBUR RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 28 MAIN AV .030 FOX rZD (SIART) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 28 .120 UNI ON RD ( S TART) U 19 L I G"rIT B I TLTM . 28 .180 PERRINE RD (ENJ) U 19 LIGIIT 3ITUM. 28 .290 SaHIPPLE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22 .380 SR-27 (FTNES R.D) U 19 PP.VED 38 .500 HOIJIL RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BTTUM. 20 .880 r9CDONALD R.D U 19 PAVED 40 .960 CLINT4N RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 MAIN AV (END) 1. 02 0 EAST END OE' ROAD U 19 PAVED 40 02944 MAIN AV ( START ) .000 WEST EIrTD TO BOLI VAR iT 19 PAVED 40 MA-IN AV .050 BOL I VA..R RD ( FND ) U 19 PAVED 40 MAI N A V ( EIvD ) .080 BOL I VAR RD ( STA.RT ) U 19 PAVED 40 02945 MAIN AV (STAR.T) .000 BEST RD U 19 PAVED 36 NLAIN AV .110 CALVIN P,D (STP~RT) U 19 PAZTFD 36 MA I N AV ( END ) .240 A.DA~'~i S RD U 19 PA17ED 40 02946 MAIN .~-~V (START) .000 CONKLIiv RD U]_° PRVED 18 MAIN AV .150 SHAMROCK S 1 (NONESTA U 19 PAZIED 30 MAT N AV ( END ) .250 EP S T END O F ROAD li 19 PAVED 30 03153 MAIN AV (STP.R'I') .000 I-iQLIDAY CT (END) & H U 19 PAVED 40 MAIN AV .100 HODGES R7 (START) U 19 PAVED 40 MAIN AV ( END ) . 13 0EAST E-ND OF ROAD U 19 PAVEl7 40 0 3 I 6 7 MA 7Iv AV( S TART ) .000 AF2GONNE RD U 19 PAtTED 40 MAIN AV .060 MULLPN KD U 19 PAVED -4 0 MAIN AV ( END ) .120 GJ I r LOW RD U 19 PAVED 40 03183 MA IN AV ( STARS ) .000 WEST END TO MiAYHEV3 S U 19 PAVED 40 MAIN AV .,02 0 MAYHEW ST (START) U 19 PAVED 4 0 .090 MAMER RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40 MAIN AV (END) .190 EVERGREEN RD iJ 19 PAVED 36 n 3 Z° S MA I N AV ( L I 3E:RTY LA.K .000 VPLLEYWAY AV R 09 PAVED 40 MAIN AV .100 WRIGHlT BV (END) R 09 PAVED 40 vIAT N AV (END ) .160 M I TCI-iELL DR R 09 PAVED 40 02938 I►4AIN AV (START) .000 FANCHER RD U 19 UAVED 32 MAIN AV ( ENTD ) .130 EAST END OF RGA.D LT 19 PP.VED 32 02940 MAIN AV (STP.RT) .000 WILLOW RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 MAIN AV (E.ND) .120 LOCUST RD U 19 LIGHT BITUZI. 20 02942 MAIN AV (STAnT) .000 BOWDISH RD U? 9 T IGHT BITUM. 22 MAIN AV (END) .120 WILBUR RD (END) U? 9 LTGNT BITUM. 22 03I05 iMAIN AV (SlA.RT) .000 FLOR.A RD U 19 LIGHT BI'?'UM. 18 MAIN AV (END) .200 TSCHII2LEY R.D (F~.VD)' U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 03130 MA I N AV ( START ) .000 .DYER 'Rn ' U 19 PAVED 22 pAGE 2 11:33:52 10 JUL 2000 Road#lt Road Names . . . . . . . . . . MPost. Rdference 'Descrintio goad Log Info VIAIN AV ( END ) .160 THI E13NAN ST U 19 PAVVED 22 0294-7 MAIN ST (MFAD) (STAR .000 1ST AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 MAIN ST .060 2ND AV U 19 LIGH''I` BITUM. 18 .130 3RD AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 .200 4TH AV U? 9 LIGHT BITUM. 18 NiASN ST (EIVD) .250 NCRTH END OF RO_AD U 19 I,IGHT BITtTM. 18 03156 MAIN ST (NiNE MILE) ( .000 SOi7TH END 10 CH.ARLES R 09 GRAVEL 16 MAIN ST (END) .080 HILL AV R 09 GRAVEL 16 17 Records Processed 7 ~ , . 1 i t , C C~ U N T ~ I' U tG ~ N I ~ c ~ ~a DIVIS1l1N 01= 1'IANNING A UMSICIN Of TkIC PtJBlac wOkKS ur:rARTmr:rrr GnKr Ot+r•.kc;, uiKm`wK MUC1-IAFI. V. NF.Fl711AR1, l.)IRf:CI`llK MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division ofi Engineering and Roads; Scott Engeihard clo Sandy Kimball Spokane County Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane County Fire Protection Distnct No. 1 Vera Water & Power FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner DATE: July 7, 2000 RE: ZE-20-00 T J~LY 20, 2000 I ~;~EE 1NG DIVISION OF PLANNING 1s CONFE EIVCE ROOM 1A Please review the above application and use the attache TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to aftend this meeting. If you cannot attend the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me prior to the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7200. Note: The Division of Planning wifl now be circulating for comments on the SEPA checklist at the time of technical review. This wifl be the onty time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA check{ist for this project. . c: Sonrise Land LLC, 11219 E. Sundown Dr., Spokane, WA 99206 Jeff Morse, Storhaug Eng., 1322 N. Monroe, Spokane, WA 99201 Attachments: Technical Review Form, SEPA Checklist, Application, Site Plan I lt)'?h W. lW~,U)tti'Al" • Sf'C)hANI:, W.1S1-11NG1'ON 992h0-0220 VttuNi=: ~509~ 4717-; z00 • F,+.Y: (5f19) 477-2243 9 TtM 4777-7113 _ Spokane County Division of Pianning Technical Review Meeting Meeting Date and Time: July 20, 2000 @ 2:15 p.m. Project File No.: ZE-20-00 Project Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Valleyway Avenue, north of and adjacent to the unimproved Main Avenue and approximately 600 feet west of Conklin Road in the SW'/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Comprehensive Plan: Urban Project Description: Zone reclassification Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 9.08 acres for 195 multi-family residences. Parcel No(s): 45133.1011 Applicant(s): Jeff Morse, Storhaug Engineering 1322 N. Monroe Spokane, WA 99201 (509)242-1000 Project Planner: Tammy Jones . . , . ~ . SPOKANE CO'LNTY DIVNION OF PLANNING L Sp AFc~ ~V f1NI) ZC~N~J izi~.~Cr~r~S,~Ir+~tC:d'~"fio •1~. A1'P.laICl,r1,1 l./N . v ~ >>n izT ~ ~~P4/1A1A1/,~. ~:~?Nr~:~z-~i: r~viFc~izn-~,A_roc~N:. IJ,1M1: C1F rtl'I't ICr1h1'I7ltl;(11tC_`,:N'('i1 I'1Vr?: " 1~►~'~~r~,(~;;~_~.`_. ~'j1____}1.~~.~.~_!1~;1.1.~1l.,x~{~ E)f°~°r.~'~-~~:1•''1~'.JIi M111 L 1 N C.i ADI? I t I: SS:---~ Y'_r l,,`!y~? crry. iii): ► 1'f IOTlI:. ~~~I_rZ~ I i`l~l~,__ (~vc~rlc) (lic»ne) VnX: IRAP1'i.IC':1N"1' 1S N(:)'C nWNr,li, INC'I.UI)r NV121'17l~N OWNER A11"]'llOlit'r,A'I Ic)iN FU12 ,11'1'LIC'/11V'1"I'O SEltNIl: :1S I L"•(i~\I. (')i~1~Nl:l:'S 1~1/~~~{I.: `_~f:3n~ i~.1'=,_~'.-_.__1~l-~QJ~_ l.. 2_.(~. PHON1:• Mri ( (..1 iJ C i ADD1 Z 1 ? Y; C_'I'I S'I'n'I`L. __;~..1_~ L__ %1I'• ~C1,~ ~ i'R(l,II:C;'I11'itO!'(-)h/11, til 11. i1121:A fl) AIa1Ac:r:N'I' r112fii\ (MINl;la O1t C_'(_)N'I'It01.1.1:1) (.►cres c~r sr~. I't.) l1SSI:SSOIt I'A110:I. N`; 01: I'it(l.II:C I'/1'ItO1'OSnl, ,1SSI;SSUit 1'A1:t'I:L IlS c"11' r1D1Ac:'I;N'I' Aitf;A OWN1?1) ()It CON'I'17n1,1.1:.{) ~:'1 Itlil~:"I' /~1:~1~12)i~'~ (;►I' I'ltC)I'l)~i11. ~ 111..j,,,l`~~.~.''..~~Lr~ r'~~_','~f?.) t!- ~t`.:~1 1~`t~t~~tCl.~_!'s! 1'~:j~`..=.~,~; (r. 1:XiST11,40 ZONi: r:Lnc;S'triCATiO>!(s) (DnTI: VSTnB,..IsI 11:1)) nC_ 141•,.) r E L fl J'I2OI'US1:I) Z(I;JINC; L? a _ (:).r} _ I'l.nN ('A I'I:(;()(tl' !~1 _ 1_l'1-- r: _ 5~ 1'li:l; I)ISI'1'ItfC"I' Wn'I'i:;lt I'U12VEY('))Z I'R(11'C)Sl'l) IJili OF l'lt(~I'lilt'I'Y• Silil;lc: I:iniily ik;=t:Ilings ( ) {)uplcxcs fIwcili~ig'. M;inufdic,liirucl h0iilt.-; ial O ~~ti~rci I 1~~c ( ~Ili~r (+Q • Ilctici ibc _ )12 C-' ('t', 1~~;> t-~ t`~ l{.~~ ( I~(7,~~~ L`' °~L'. 1~)`~?~~ ~~1~L•C~J~a I.I!;'I lylil?vlO1,1, PI.nhlNlNc; AcI'It)NS INVC.II,VINC; 'I'1 IIS PltO111i1t I Y. ~~.~~~_-~~~~~.1' .~~_~_e)`v_..~.~.~.___.,__.._... l;. i_,E(:A1,/%ONK' ltE.('t,r18~S11''[f1i1`I'1t)N 1NFOitil'1Ar1'1(')N: ~.~~c~~~~i~~c~r~i c~i~ ~►itr~i~c~sni. 1'_~L~I~~,.~i ~ c~ ~~~4 U f1t-t_ P 1h(i.EL-1 .1!:J~~J .')Y f`,~'~ ~~_)~'`E~:L~•~t ~j 'Cf)1,VNS111P ,D_1tAN07 c iN! r1 M ( : C1F I' l 1 I 3 I . I R ( ) A I )(S) 1' It V I I ) I N ( i .n CC:1:.`,;:i. ~ j} ( ._L.~.~ ~ ,1~ 1'%1lD'f II 0FI11201'1`.It'!'Y FI2ON f'INi, UN 1'Ili'si,lC ItUMi: {7(.►I_ti I'I{I: 1'hc]I't)`aAl. 11AVIi i1(..'(_I:Sti'I'U 11N A12'I'I;ItI/11. Cllt I'1,ANN1:!) Alt I'f:ltlAI. W,135 O ti~O H A t<<it:(5) 0 f: A It't't'It1A 1, R0A 1)S t ~ , . ~ SlJBDlVlSlON AN13 '.t_)Nl: A1'I'l.l(:i1'1'1(a'N 1',2 oF /1 1,1:C►r1L D1:5(iltll'I'IO]J O1' I'ltOI4:10'1' (lllt»ch Icgst) cfc:sciil)6011 ti'ith sOuic:r 0l'Ik'Ltifi) cli.'irly iiici'tr,ilc(l a INCl.l.11)1: I.I:C;A(. I)FS(_'Itll'TIUN FOIt DN'1'llil; AIti:/1'I'O IIli S1.1131)IVII)1-.!) caN I'I(I:I.IMfiJnltl' t Si il3Dlvl.St0'I,I NlnPA Hu Iti:QUi;.s i l:D ZONiNC; FOlt EACi 1 I.UTnriu i+i.00k: 1`01 IZ F.,01_11:S'!'S. IF Y(1l I IlU N(~yl' 1101.1) I I'!'I.I:'I'O !'itOI'I:IZ I'1', W11A'1' IS 1'(alJlt IN'I'I:121?4'1' !N I'I'I ._11' :f*% ; t~ ~..~!_~~~\j L- \VllnT;tiiiFTIII: c1(InNc;l"D C(:)Nf)ITlO»JS OF Titl: Attt:A WiltClt tifnll Ft:Fi,. Mn11".1r"1'1I1S !'I:O!'Uw/1 t, WAIZ itl11J I'I:t I-I (v) Lf I l' .l ! i.~ i•.a C~, t~ i , t ~ c. ~ ...b ~•_a ~~~L1 a ` r~l::i.4_..~~..~~.::~_~.~11~~~.~~r~ (1 . , Wtli`T (MPnC'1' M1,1.'l (I1: 1'ft0ll'0ST;I)'1.0.1Nl: 12rCLASSl1;ICi1'1'lON I(11V1: «N'I'ill: l1f).I/1(.'l:iJ"!' i' 1 t U 1' i : ! t' l' I I i s''? tY _yLgj_j-A=_jv " Pc t _ -s-_f'iN f~ f : T - @~J 1, -1~.~ ~ ~',_L`-? ~~.re"'..~_~J n 1 ~ ~ t~ L° . \lrlln'I' FAC:'I'01:.10;IIPPC7R'I"I III:'/.ONI;1tl:C:l.rtiSSIrIC:A'I'1()N? l~~`~I~C►_. l••.~~~~E~a~_~ (i l~.L.'~~.._..~ , 'at'-~:~~'-►~' f1i;~~~ ~ •~~e,~~~~-_~..~..r.•.>L~,~._1'' 1-~~(1v~nt' t C~~: = ~ 1,,_1 l= .aL (1 ~ ~~~i i~~•r Nti:nSi>>;~;ti i~c~ vi~t~ i~i~c~~~r~~i: n1lt'rlc;n*ri,: Y01.>>i I1i(0P0.1-)At.'s iMrnc:~~'ON S~IZ~Z`J~~N~~~1`!~1 ~./~~`~~J ~~•1~:~~ jill,~ ~~:'_3 ~J~t~' i.li]~~ ar~1 e~.~ 4,~~ 1~ ly~.°~1.L._~.,~, ~•``~.~Y`.-~ s 1 ~ ' ' 1 ~ a 1,~ 1 ~ ~~'~i$ ` 1 ) ~ ~ 1~, ~ r.~_ ~ _ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~.L:___l......~:_.~ ~ J ~ l 4 ~ , ' ~ ! J ~ . . . 121~.1,ii~111Vikit'~ 13ll11!I,~~ ,IOhl C►1~,N f~ +~l\(., TNI+t)1211~1~~ I1.ON: NI.iM111:11 (7FI.O'I'ti ---9 GftOR(SAltl:A: ~C.~ ~,.~_•`~.f:~ :7'~i l~r~.~ • •i'vi'ic:ni, 1.0'1 Slii: ~~i7ot►~a~~A) N,:TDrNS>•i•ti,4. ~ SMA1aL,UFS'f I.C)'I' S1/l.: 1'v,~I M1NIMl)NS i'ItOTJ'I'M,;l: !'itc~l'US1:I7 S(.)URt;:l: (?l: WA'I"i:lt: lnciividiial wc115 O f'rrl►lic ti~~slcci~ I'rivate C'ommuliily ~;ys~cm Utl~cr I~c:tict il,r. L'.~c,j`► 1,_) f1 i l' 2~) ~~~.•~1-A n-trnNS 0 i~ i'-W nG t; »iR rOsni.~ !'uhlic ticwci C'cnlifiliinily sys~cni ( 1 Seplic: tank cincl 1I1s1inliclcl O I.)oiihlc 1'iumhing f )i•y `ic:wcr ( ) ~71hcr ( ) 1)cssr;ribc:: ~-0 D R..av..7 tti' j~_ i ti,J,~,~:_l ~ vf_ r U la~i11 _c._ vo U'I1 1.('1"YCUM 1'ANI(sS nNDfC.~lt P1S'('}tIC'l:fi'I'Cl I'ItOVI(>f:Sf:ltV IC I:"I()'I'lllS I'ROI'OS 111,: (:Ive(►iCily: .~_1 1) -,~j Snvci (ias: . . (N~J ~~=_l:~'.~- I'Itc~ttc: LAI !an 1'UU, Ult 'fl lli L)1'Jm:ll (t~! '1'I 11: l;V1:N'1' l'(Jl I I)C) NO't' OWN I llS I'ItO1'E7It'1'Y, I lAVl; 11TJY I'I./1NS FOIt l'll'I'llltl' A1)t)I'I'10NF-*., I•XI'Ar1SIC1NSOR Ft_ilt'I'111";R i1(r'I'IVI'I'Y Itl:lA'1'1:17'I'U'I'lllS I'ItOf'OtiAI.'1 Y~~ ( 1 No I'12I~ l,iti~11N~~1tl' wCJl~l~l'~r1,~il~N TM1'12()VEN1T;N'I' 11V1I'O12MA'1'1ON: (A. S'I-(tI:L`•1' 1N11'17OVI'MEN'I'S, 1'ItOl'OSI;l): I'iivale ro;icls O I'tihlir: rn.icls ( 1 Ai Ici ial I tunils O '1'i cict X rc►;icls O I)(;5CR1111; A14Y t:;C)Ni I11NA'I'(ON c?F I111C)V1a. ;~.(?^~.L~ c•_~1~~ r~"y') tJ-j ~lv_~ ~ l1 f? r ~ -,~~l.~. t: 1,1(`~ ~ ~~'.r ~~l.~a Ea ~...,_,_~a ~ _1~f ~.r.~-~~ i._ _ c--►~ ~ - cs~ I' I'I(1-IA'I'I•:I'I'IlvtF' I'I;)ti(71) l:Xl'I:C(;U l:(')I2 C:f)ivtl'l.l:'I'l: OF'1'lll: SIJIID1vI.1w),jq• LR1 . .1~~. fS ijt-iM;iNG c>>''i'l iE: i•i«Ai.i•r.nTiON OF Ti ii: S1JI31alVISI(:~N >•L:j No O Pftn.~INC, ONTiM Piii:UM11JA12Y IS I`11:talCtl'I'l(7N ('tF l,/1N1) F(11Z I'IJIII.i(' tJSl; CON'I'Isi1i11'1.A'i'I:I ) (I':irk5, whuoiti, i:lc.)? Nc Yl:ti, IJC:ti(=ltllil;• ~ * NI?T Ia1:N51'I'ti' IS'I1N1 I:ti OIt I.U'! S I'l:lt ACltli NIINU5► 1'ItlVt1'1'(: AN1)1OIZ 1't)III.1l_' lt(~/1D A121:.i1. . . . 0 SU13UlVISION ANU ZOUE ~'.ECi.,ASSlr-ICA"('1'ON A1'I'LICA"I'lON I'a~e') ol' 4 I'AR'i' (T "!'i-!IS Si-CT10N Or TI-IE AI'PL(Ci1TION WILL T'ItOVIDL'• "i'I-IL• D1VISION OF 13UILDING AND 1'[.f1NN(NG S'1'nl'f ~wl'fl-( WRIT'T'CN VGRIT'ICATION TI fAT'I'!°IE AI'PLICANI' IIAS 1-lAD I'ItCLIN1iNAItY CONSUL"i'A'I'ION WI'I'1•i "f'I-f1.::1GCNC(C'S IDGN'fIFIGD. 12GSULTS OFPREI.1NiINl1RY CONSULTATION SI-lAl.l. [3L INCO(ti'ORA'I'EfJ 1N Tf Ir; I'RO('OSAL l3EFORE i'IVAL SU[3m1TTAL TO TI (C DIVISION Ol' l3UILDING AND f'LANNING. , • ' r ALUR : 13ISMUT - A. 'I'IIIS f'ROi'OSAI.. IS W17'(11N f'Iftf:I'ROTCCT(ON DISTRICTNO. . It. AC)CQUATC ARRANG[:MEN'('S (IIAVf) (11AVr NOT) l3lii:N NiAD(~ TO MGETOUR NI:EDS I,! I'ROVIDING I'OR nN nDEQUA1'r ~VnTrR SYSTrfvi i1Nf~ ~i1CILC~ICS C'OR !'IKI: I'IZO"I'I:CTION PUltl'OSL•S. C. It1iCOMMf~iiVf~[:D f~lltr I~LQ1~~: ~/3 ; Olt UNA I31-C TO C/1LCUL1ITC NOW I3CCAUSC USC (S NOT DGf INITIVL'•; nNl7 WILI., 131-7 IaETI.;(ZMINCI) /1T QUII.DING 1'rRMI"I' Al'I'LICA"1'ION `I'I141f.; 1). ItEQUll2[:IvtC'NI'S INCLUDE: ~ '5> 14,r ^/f KALc.r-Y r- L r I 7 8 zo~o ' F1RC DISTRICI' AkATURE/TITLE ~/)AT' = 'i: i J A. St\TISI~AC'1'OR1',~ltiin' ~Grn~r~, rs roit DoMrS.i'IC WA'I'L'•It AND I'IItG I`LOW I2E:QUl1Zf:MLN'l'S -{HAA4s}, (llAVi? NOT) t31:EN MADI:. B. R EQU I R CM E~N`I"S1COtv1 Ni CNTS: c,/,4; .-a Pu4.J W ,Ig ~PO: t r R_~Y~ . lJ~ u.lmf24 t~ wer- ~r--~'.~~~~►~- AR or- oP. z s-o 0 kvA-i'rR DIS'(-Ric,r SIGNATurti=rriTi..C DATi7i (:UUN I'Y LIVC;INLLlt ~ ~ A I'Rf:IrIMINARY DISCU,~'S115A1-W,4S I'f1KCN ('LACG AND GENERAL RE(,)UIREMCN'1'S FOR RQnDS nND D(tA1Nt1G1: t1Avt. C31:t--:N DISCUSSE-D'Wff1-I ~ II3APPLtCnNT. A. COMNiGNTS: , SIGNATU1:C/'1'1'fLI7 pATE . G ~1 1'ttl;LlN iNl1Rl' f~ISCUSSt N(-InS TAI<CN I'I,ACI: /1N[~ ~rNI:RAL ttEQUIItrM(:N'I C'OIt SU13M1`t"I'iV, 0I:1'111S1'It01'OSAI., (11.1VI:) (I1.1V1: Nq'1') BI:EN Sn'I'ISHI:I). 'f'lIEUESIGNn'I'1:D WA'1'I3R I'URVEYUR FOR T! us-51 I(: S :1. COMiMEN"1'S• JA)hkc- 5~,c/~✓/' Y~°1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IcNn it n~rr: ~ 1,~I 11,1)l ~ l.~ o.~~a~~► o~ ~cc~, A I'tt'•I.IN11NA1tY DISCUSSION FlAS Tnl:EN PLACE AND GENE Al. 17L UIItCML`"N I'S I~ C~ rmj i rn l, OF`I'i•(IS I'ltOt'OSAL (It,1VC) (IIAVI? NO'1') l3L`•L'•N SA•risr•irn. ~ A coMMrNTS: (S ~ ~~&Un - c(I i u►ziri~rt., . Dn'rry°~ .~r , E-YU A I'REI.IIVIINA1tY D! CT1S5}QNi I IAS '1'!11<I;N I'LACG r1Nf) GCNEIZ/11.. RL:QUIR1:ML'N'I'S FOR 'I'(11: C'I:OVISION UI- !'Ut31_IC SI:WCIZ n-ltlz--1j1~Dl:RSTO0D 131' TI IE nl'I'L1CAN7'. ik_ COIv11vtCN7'S: SfGNATURCITI'fl.f: pATE . ~ SU13U1VlSION AND Z0Nri IZ.11CLt1SSIl'-'ICArT10N .,PI'LICA"I-ION Page 4 of' 4 1'ART I I I SURVrI'OR VI-LRII'fCATION THE UNDCRSIGNED, A LICE NSf:D l,AND SURVCYOit, I-IAVC COMPt,ETLD "t'I-IL'• INFOitMATION It(-7t'~UCSTI:U ANU 'I'I ll-7 ZONING MAP, Lf GAL D(:SCRIP'fION, ANI) 1'1tE-LIMINAItY ('LAT I•lnVf l3Lk:N I'itl:l'AitEa l3Y ME OIt UNDC12 MY SUPLRVIS10N (N ACCQRDANCI? WI'I'FI '1'I-IE IZCQUIRCiviCN-rs ar• `i'!-IC SPOKANC COUN'f Y"LUNING/SUI3DIVISION RGGULA1'IONS AND T!•IE L11NVS OF 'fl IC STATL' 01= WnSIIING'1"ON. SIGNCD: DATE: Icr ~ADDRf:SS: 716 1'I-tUNE: 0C-0 ~7 Z I f' PART I V (SIGNATURC' OF ('ROI'ER"i'Y OWNrRS OR LCTI'E-R Of AU"fl-IOItiZATION) i, "f 111: UNDCRStGiJED, S1WEAR OR AFFIRtii UNDCR PCNnLTY OF PERJURY TI•IATT!•ir A130VE 1tI=S!'ONSES AIZC R1AnE TRUTf-IFULLY ANU TO TI-1C l3CST OF iv1Y hNOWLGDGG IFUIZ'fl Il-it SWI;AR Olt nl'I'IR~~1 TI lAT' I i1A~i `"I il~: 01VNGR C~r It[:C0f2n OI. T( il: ~~Rl:f1 I'(tQl'QSI:n I'nlt `I'1-il- f'12CVIOUSLY IDCN'CIFICU LAND USL'• AC'I'ION, QR, Il- NOTTI-!E. OWNL'•R, A1"CACI-iL"•U {-lEltlTW I I'll IS WRl1`TriN !'LRM(SSION C'CtOM T(-It. OWNl:R. A U"ff-iORiZING MY A61'I0NS QN I-11S/I-IE-R I3L'•!lALr. 5c) N--) 0-3SC_~ n lJ L~ .1..1--.L` . S I G N C D: ~ 12 f1 D/1'['"• : 6 Z- 4ZI) o nDDREss: I 1 aiCi iII ioNr:: ~.~--,-~5 7 5 .ll✓-) K A 1o I Z11': . SIG M'Uf'tr QI_ • t'PL(Cr1N'f OR RGI'ItrSrNTA`rIVL DA1'E S`I'A'I'r; OF WASf IING'CON ) ) ss: COIJNTY OF SPOKANL SIGNC:D AND SWORN OR ArF1R(MLI) [3EfORr ME 0N TI lIS (3AY OF J c ~nc , BvJ. CQran~ Pest?Dn c. ik ~ ~ No"I'A1t1.,~~►o~: F+A..~•~•,~ o ; . PJOT-\F~Y s~': ~ . Notary I'ublic in anL1 for th` Statc uf WilSI1111610 ~'(n:U1 : • ~ . PUaLI C~. : '•C.~ C Itcsi~lii,b ~it: n : yj►'•. '!.o : p : 'sso,~O~ My nppointment cxpiics: ~~f r e» ~ a1~~~ I'A RT V ('i'O 131- CQNII'LL:'I'LD 13Y 'i'1-lE nIViSIQN OF L3U11.DING AND ('Lr1NNINC) I)A'I'L"• SLI(3M1'1`I'CD• FIl_G N ~ [)A"I'(--* ACCEI'l'CD: I3Y: "('OTAL ('rES: ~~t~ • DO CtE7CClf'T ll: 1 -PRr: .r~n9r7rVrz=-iE-r,rrr•-NT M:~ ` SpO R~'~Et U~U . 1VE CGU,V71, , ,l UN 8 2000 5~oiV 0~ pU;V~1lpIY `.i O~~. .~~a~.~• ~ . t SCPAr.NVIRONR1[~,NTnL CriLc:r:LIsT WAC I 97-11-9f U Srokmie Enviroiiniental Orctinancti: Section 11.10.230(1) [ V RPO.) l: U I' Cia c!'1•i. uI, "nie Stale CnNiront»ental i'olicy Act (SEC'A), chapler 43.21 C fZCW, requires all 6overnmental agencic;s to coiisitler the enviiontricntal impaccs Uf a propoml before inaking decisioiis. An environmentaJ impact statement (EIS) must ve prepared for all proposals with prabable sibmificant adverse impacts an the qualiry of ihe environitieiit. ne purpose of this cliecklist is to prnvicte infAr,nAtian to hell, yoii and the Agency iclentify inipact froiii vour pioposal (and to reciuce or avoid impacts from thc proposal, if it can be do»e) anct to help the CiIcy decide whctieer 7n E IS is requirecl. IrV.S'/'I2tIC'lM<<'.S FnRAPf'I.ICANI:SV 'Iliis eiivironmeiita1 ciiecklist asks you to ciesc;ribe some basic iriforrnation aUout yuur proposal Governmefital <<geiicies use this checl:list to deterniine whether tlic etivironmentai impacts or your proposal are sibnificant~ icnuirinb preparafio» of an CiS. Aiiswcr the quEStinrts bi-iefly, Nviih the most precise infonnation knoNm, or sivc ihe besc clescription you cvi. Yoti m«st miswer cZCh question accurately cnd carefiiily, ro the besr of your knowleclge. ln most eases, yoti sliould bc able c4 iuistivcr the questions (coin your Uwrn observahons or project p(aiis witiiout ihe need to hire experts 1 t' you rea11y do not {.7iow tite miswer ar if 7 quc;sCion does jiot app1y to your pcoposal, write "do not l:now" or °does ncat apply". Cocnplete answcrs ta lhe quc,~stions »ow may avoid unnecessary delays laiea•. Somc ciucstions ask about governmenial i•egulatians, suclt ns zoning, slioreliiie, ajid l.wdmark dcsign;itloris. fliiswer thcsc; qiiestioii ii'yoii Gin. Cf yrou have probleiTis, thc bovenimeiitiil abe-iicics canassist you. 'I°he checklist qucscions apply to 711 parls of yuur proposal, even ifyou pIan to do tliem ovcr a perio(i oC time or cm clifferCnt p.icccls of Ituid Attach Zny acldilinnal infonizatioii that wIIl I1C:Ik) d4S(:i•ibe yout pronnsal oi its Ct1VIlQIlI114111AlCIlt'_G1S Tht', ageI1Cy l'() WI11CI1 yOll SllbIlllt t11S CIIECk II5t tiiay HSk yoti !O eXplFllll yOUf mswcrs or provide additiOnal inForniation iuuonably itilated to delennining if lhere may be signific:ant advei;e imnact. Usc ur• c•r«cxf rs I' !'OR iV("lN-AROJIC%- l3irOil)sAI.s: Coiiplete this chc~~cklisr for noii-pr(~jecl pi'UpOSiIIS, t4VCi1 IIIUIiI.~~{1 qUf:SIlU11S Illily bE'. :U1SLVereCI "cloes iiot apply." ►n aDDITION, cottiplete ihc; SUPA(..CMCNTAL SI IC•`i' f4R NUN-E'ItQJLGT AC'fJONS (part D). For noii-}aroject actians, the reterenecs iri the checklist lu tlie words "praject," "applicant," aiid "propsily or sile" should be read as "proposal,° "proposer," and "afi'ec:ted t!eobraphic area," respcctivc;ly, snokmic !-i►viruniltem:tl (kdinaume C:hccklitir 11.mc 2 U1'21 A. BAcI;c1t0 uNn rit_UPwji:cT• ho. I. Namc of'nropostcl pro.jecr, if apPlicable. 1'ast Valicv Scniors Name of applicmit: Sonrise l.,ancl LLC. 3. Acldress ancl nhone iiurnbcr of appiicant and contact person: c/o StOI haiia l.:nt_icleeriiiu attn: .left' ktorse 1322 North Nlouroe Sool:anc. Washinumn 99201 .f. Dt1te checklist pre:pared- JunE ?5. 2000 5. 1\geiicy requestitig checklist• Snol:aiie Couiitv uivision of'C>>rrent Plaiiniii~ 6. hapased tiiiiing or schcdule (iticluclinb phasing, i!'applicable): T'hasc onc is sclicduled to st7re s►iiiinier of 2U0 I and be cnmpleted lav sui-nmei• 2002 ririal uliase is sclieduleci for coinnletioii iiti the suininer of ?C103. . ~ Spok;niL I,-'.m u-ormicrir,il C)rciin:inc:c: C.:hec:klist 1'.~~,c 3 ur 21 A. C3ACKGRnUN1) (u►»linued). 7. ;i. Do yau have any rlans ('or (iiture additions, expanision, or fiirther activity tilated to nr connected with tilis v o. , b. Do you own or have options on land nearby ar adlacenc to this propostil? If yes, explain. IN o 8. Lisl aiiy cnvironmcntal in('annatio» you know abaut that has becn prepiired, or will be prepared, directly related to tliis proposal None'known 9. Do yrou kno%v whether applications are petiding for governiiiental approvnls of olher proposals ciircctly aff'ecting tl~e prUperty covered by your proposal? If yGS, explain None krio%vn_- . 10 L,ist ariy governmcm approvals or pennits thaf will bc; needcd ior your rroposal, O'kriown 13uildin~, permirs ancl all othci nermits associAted Nvith the consiruction of seiiior niicl mullifamily lzousini-, ti1,ok.inc I:i7viruiicnem;il Qrdin:mcc (:13tc:Rlist 1'at-,c: 4 uf 21 A. 13ACKGI20LINU (continuial): 1 1. Give a brief, Cl)!11(]IE:Ie ClCSGI•iption of your pi-oposal, If1GIl1d111~,► tlle p1•oposecl us4s aiid tlie size of Ilic project aild site Therc are several quesnons Iater in tliis cliecklist tht-tt ask you to describe certain.aspects oFyour proposal. Y ou clu iiot need to repcat tliose answers oii this pagc. The currcnf nliiiis coiisist oFapuroximatclv ?/s ui'the 9 i acres to be devclnPed as i>>oderate iiiconie multifamilv ( 120 units) and the iemaininu I/i woulcl be cieveloped i1S 1ffnrdable seniar housine 175 u»itsl. 12 Location of the pconosal Give SuFfiCletlt i11fOrni3hU11 I'Or- a l)erson la unclerstatid lhe precise locatiait of yrour p►•oposcd rrajcct, inciucfin6 ki strect addcess, if any, iinci section, township and raiige, if known. If a proposa) would occur over a ranbe af area, 17rovide (he range or bouiidarics of the site(s) llrovide a lesal description, site plan, vicinity inal), and topographic mai), if reasoiiaUly ii<<7ilable While yOu shnulcl submit any plans requiled by tlle abeiic;}+, you iire iiot reqiiired to duplicate inaps or detailcd plans submiried with any permit applie~~tion related to this cheGl:list "I'he oroic'c:i lies iii Ihe S W'/~ of Section 13 7'ownshiP 25 Rance 4=1. The strccr ad(fress is 160 10 E. VallcvwaU_ Sec fittuched leLal clesc:rintion. I'31 . Ddes the proposed actiuii lic witliin tlic Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)) The General Sewer Service Are£►'? The Ni-iority Sewer Seivice Area? The City of Spukanc? (Sce: Spokane Coutity's AS.a Overlay zone Atlas f'or bauiicluries). AS,a - Yes GSSA - 1'es . PSSA - 1'es Gitv oCSnnl:ane - Nlo Spc>l:nne FnvironnAc.~it:ii Orc}innrirc C:licLklist I'ALIL 5 Uf'21 , ~ ~ • ~ro ac coINIPLETET7 BY APPI..iCANT 13. Lf1'VtltONNil?NTAi. E1..CNI1?iV'f5: 1. GA R'I'll 3. Geiieral tiescriptioiti oftiie site (circle one)(fla()rolling, hilly, steep slopes, inountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope an the site (appraximate percent slone)? flimroximatclv 1 ulo c What general rypes of soils arc 1'ou»cl ori the sitc (for example, clay: sarul, bravet, peat, kluck)7 If yc,u know the c:lassilicatioii o1'abricultural soils, specify theni and note any pricne rai,niand. Gt,A - Garrison Cravelv I.oam cl 11re there surfaCC I1ICIICilIl011S OI' I11St01y of unslable soils in the immetliate vicinity? ! r su. c1esclibe. vone knawri e, 13esci•ibe the purpuse, type and approximzte quantities of any Fllinb or graciing pioposcd lnclicate svurce of fill. N,liniiniil LI.1(1ii1L,IurcoiisUuctio,i oCsenioicenter,iiid nxoder,,ite incoinehousinL,. .Also cunstrttctiun ol' j)7rkiiit: lot with enuueh space to niect iecluirc;inciits. f. Cuuld eiosion occur as aiesuit of clezri»b, consh-uction, oruse? If so, gericrally clescribe. t3est m,inaaEiT~em oractices will be «sed and cunsinietion will compltir wilh SCAI'A. LaiICISCaplTlk? WIlI C0111nIV ivIIII SoOk811e COU(lIV Iflndscane and sereenine standfirds (14.$06). Spn)",inC Fnvirorime:tii-A C)rclun:mce 01cc.l:liNU Pti~,,c 6 o('21 B. ENVI120yf11CNTAL E I.ENIEy'I"S (Cuntinued): :~bout ~vl~at pe~•cc~it of tl~c site ~~ill l~e caverecl ~villt impen~ious sur f'aces ;~fter proje:ct Construction (for example, asplialt or buildiiibs)7 Approxii»acelv 51 % this iiicititles asPlialt. buildirii-, iincl sidcwallcs. 9. ('roposed riiea.SUres to reduce or cnntrol crosian, or other impacts to the earth, if arly: Snokane Countv 208 Storm water Guidelines anci lruidscaPint-1 ancl Scrc;enine standards ( I4:806) tvi I I hc inct. 2. AIR .I. mint type or emissions to thc air would result fi•oin the proposal (i.c ,dusl, automobile, oclars, iiiclust-ri11, w00d 5111okt'.) (jUl'ITIg GOf1SlTtIC1lOIl a11Ci wllefl tlle pCQjeCI IS COi11J)IeleCI? Ifany, gcnerally clescribe attd give approximale quanfittes, it'knowm. t=.missions ti-oin carishliction ectmoment durine carlstr«clion. OnCe ihe Oruiect is comuleted Ihcre will be miiiiinzf auto emissions fi•oin resideizc:e zinCi visitors. l) Are Iherc any oFt=site sources oCemissions or odor Ilizit niay affect yo«r pruposal? I f so, gc:iic:ially dtscribe. vo. . C. ('ionosecf mcasures ta rccluc:e oi' contro) emissians or other i»>p7cts tc) air, if any- N/A. Spc,k.uic L'iivironmrnt,il tJrLlu1.incc t:liccklisr I',ivc 7 o1'21 ~ . . . 3. NN'ATFR a Surf 7ce: l)!s tltere any suu•fiace water Uody Url or in the immediate viciiiiry a1'the: site (ancludirig ye<<r-rou»d aiicl seasana{ srievns, s,-rlhvater, lakes, ponds, wcilands)? If yes, describe nrpe and provide n(iiiles_ lf apprOpnlte, slate wliat strevn or river it t]ows into. ry'he Snokane rivcr lies approxtmntclv 1/2 IO 3/a of a i'iilc to tlie Nortli. Will tlte project require ariy work ovcr, in, or adjaccnt to (within 200 feet) che described waters? if yes, please descHbc and atlach availablz plmis. 1\ ca. a) Lsliitiat` tlte aittount of'till and drecige m<<terial that would be placed iii or renioved 1'roi» ,tit tace water ur wetlancls .irid indic7tc tlie arcn af (he sitc that would bc af'tectcd. lndicate the source of fill materia(. N/:1. 4) Will the prwposal ieqtiiie Sui CHcc water wiUidrawals or diversiuiis? Give a bclle;ial Description, purp0se, aii(l 7pproxiinate quantities if known. N o. 5) Does tlie prvposal lic witliin a 100-ye7r ilnodplain? 1Cso, note loeation on tlle site jalan. N u. tipnl..mu F-rivironnicim.il Ordinan«• C:liecl;li,,t I'.im: 8 ct1*21 R. CNVIIZONIN[ENTAI. L'LLN1h:N"I'S (Conttnucd): G) Does the proposal involve aily clischar~cs af ~~rasle materials tc.~ surfitce wwaters`~ If so, Describc tiie type of waste and anhcip11ec1 voltime of (iischarge. tio. b. Gi our~d• 1) Will groundwater be withcirawi, ar will water be discharbed to ground water•'? Cjive gerieral deseription, purpose, -tuid approxiniate qiiantitic;s if 1:»own. No Desenbc waste nitltc;rial tliat will be ciischarged inta tlie grc>und from septic lanks or Othe;r sfiriitairy waste trc,nlilient facility. Describe the general size of thz system, the numVer nf houses to be served (if applicable), or the numUer oCpzrsoiis the syateni(a) ar~ ~xpectcd to servc. There is 1 c;xistiriu residence cun•c:ntlv usine A sentic systeni. The: nronosc:d proiect will use the sariitarv sewer that is currentlv beiiia exteiicied to the area. i) qescribe aiiy systems, other tliiin those desigiieci for the dispnsal Qf Sanit.iry w:iste, iiistalled ('or the nurpose of discliarbicib fluids below the i-round surface (including syst4ins such i1s Ihnse For the disposal of stoi7n water or clrainabe fiom (loor (lraiiis). uescribe the t)Te nt'system, tlie amount of mateiiFil to be disposed of'throush the systcm iiiid ttie types of' materials likely to bE disposcd of (including materials wliich may enter the aystein itiii(lverlentfy Ihra«bh sliills ar as a res«It of tire figliting activities). Sool:ane Gouiitv 208 storni water auidelines will bc met. lpo4..mc UiiN is•cmiiZeiil:il Llitlin,incc C:hc:cklisl I'.i~;~• 9 of 21 13. U1VIItONN'lt:\'1'Al..l?l.E N1rNTS (Confinuctl). 4) Will any cltieinicals (especi7liy oreanic solvznts or petraleum Ciiels) be storerl in abave- Liound or u~idcrbround storage t7iiRs? if so, what lypcs suuf quiuitities of »>aterials will be srored? Na otlier than some pesticides. hci bicides and fiicls use(1 for maintenance of the p,•onosed urOiect 5) Wliat protective measures will be taken to ensure that (eaks or spills of any cheinicals starcci or us%-Id nll 51Ct; WIII IIOt bC altowed to percolate to grauiidwater (iliis inclutles mensiires to kcep cheriiicals out of dispasal systenis describecl in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? ?(lS swales will be used tn c;ontrol storm wzler ninaff frnrn impervious sui faces accordine to SpOki1nC CO11t11V ?US L'tl1CIIiIIES, C. Wi11C1• hui)oFf'(including s(orm water) 1) Describe the sourcc: of runoff(I[1CIUCIIl1g StOi'lll w31e1) a»tl metliotl oi'collectic.~» aiid Dispos11, if auty (inchidc qi2anlities, it'knowri). Wliere will thi5 water llow? Will this waler flow into otlicr wa►ers? (f sU, (lescribe. 20$ swaleS wi1h drvwails will be used ta-collect ancl ciisoose of stonn watcr ruii oCf. I'viost ot'tlie storm water will he filterecl throueh rhe swale as thc clrywell riiiis will be 0.5' al.iove Will any clieiiiicals be storecl, handled 01• used on ihe sile in a IoCatiun where a spill ur leak wi11 drain to surfilCL' Or gioundwater or to a stoitin watc,- disposal system clischarging to surtlace or groundwater? None otlter than for ianitorial ,ind maintcnancc in iiiicl arouiid the u!•onosed uroiect. 3) CotiIcl waste tnaterials e►iter gr0uild or Surf7Ce wat4rS`? IFso, benerally clescribe. OnlN► spills tlicit mav Occur durine mainteriaiicc and imilori€1I worl:, aricl tlic sPills will inost likelv he clcancci ui) nnd IiltcrecJ thi•onah the 209 swales tirol.,me Fiiviroiimc:itt:il Orclm,inc:c C.hcrl;list 1',i~!e 10 of'21 ~ • l ~ B. T:NVI ItON1lCN`l'AL EL.LMEAT$ (Cuntinucdl• cl. Proposed measures ro rctiuce ar control sui facc:. giouncl, aiid niiiaf i' wattr iinpacts, if any (if thc proposecl actioit lies witl>>n the Anuitei' Sensitive Area be c:specially clezir on explaiiatinns r41atin6 to CaciliUes canceniinb Sections 3b(4); 3b(5), aiid 3c(2) ofihis checklist)_ Adheririt.: to the SPal:ane Cniuih, 208 stonn water tiuidelines 4. ['[.,1M'S ri Cliccl: or circle typcs oC vegetation Cound oti ihe site: Dcciduous tr4c- aldc;i', ma , as{aercoiher Lvergrcen Iree. fir, cedar, ther Shrubs X G Inss t'as(uii; Cral) or graiii Wct soil plants: cattail, 13ii(tei•cui), bullrush, skiiiil: cabt»ibe, Oncei Waler plants. water lily, eelbr7ss, niilfoil, other r Other types of Ve~;etation I). What I:incl nncl iiiiwtuit ofveVtitituit wtll l» teiituved or alt`rc;c1'? Current Iandscanina inav be removed or 7ltered arid iiew landscamim wil) be addecl to meet Snakane Countv Iandscripine amcl screeninu stantiards (14.806). c l.,ist threatened or enclanSered spccics knUwn ro be on or near th4 site. Nonc i`nown. as thc surroundint* area has bcen urbnriixed_ d Proposed 17ndscapiiig, tise of riativc rlants, or ollic;r k1caSUrCS Io pr4StirVC O1- enhaiice vebetatiari ori thc site, ifany: Spokane Gaunlv laridscaninz tind scieenin,_ staiidaids will bc met as reauiied hv tlie butldinu [7cpartme►tt. Srak:uic L:nvironmentil Orclii7ancr f:hecklist I'.ikc: I I of 21 3 B. EN1JIItQNN1ENTAI.. t?l.Li11fNTS (Cuntinucd): 1. ANlllriLS a. Gircte 7ny birds aiid aiiiir»ls Nvhicli have been observcd on or nem Ihe site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: lia«-k, herori, eaglc2 ngbird other mnmmals deer, bew-, elk, beaver= other. fisli: bass, salmon, trout, heiTing, shelltish, other: b List any thretiteriecl nr enclanaered species knowm to be on or nenr thc site. No priociht haDllats ar snecies uer crilical aren m7us. c. Is thc site part of a rnibration rnuie7 li'so;'cxplain IN!o. d. ('roposcd mcasures to preseive or enhance wildlife, if any• NI r1. 6. ENcRGYAyD NATuwAir lirsourtGcs ~i. What kintls of enec•b}~ (~'lcctric, nntural ~as, Oil, ~vaod stove, solar) ~vill be uscd to nicGt t1ie cnrnpleted prnject's eiieigy needs? Describe whetlier it will be usecl far I-teatin?, manu('acturirig, etc. Electricitv f'or lizhtine and heatinL and pussiblv natural cas for heatina. t). Wcaulcl yau~- piaject a(Tect the potrntial use of solar cnergy hy acijacEnl properties? I f so. gerieritl ly descr•ibe. No. Spr&.inr I:nmranincm;il Oiclm:iitce C:li«l,list 1':iur 12 tyf 21 . ` B. fNV1RC)NMCN'CAL I?LEl11LiV`i'S (Cnntinuctl): c. Whac kincis of ciiergy conservation feiitures are includcd in the plans ()f Ihis proposal7 I-ist othtr Tm-npOSed tncnsures (0 recluce or colitiol cncrb}' ilr11)"Icts, if <<ny: Spokaiie Couiitv c;nerav co(leS will be imPleinentecl in GaiistruCtiari of Ihe pronosccl moiect 7. CNVIRONML'N'I'AL i-1EAL"i'H a. Are Ihere any environmeiilal tiealth lifizards, includinb exposui'C l0 IOXIC ClieilllCalS, [tisl: of tirC an(i explosion= spill, or lia•r.arclous tivaste, that could occur as a resulr ot this propUSal? l f so, describe. C7lll'IIIL; COT1Sti•iactio» there may bc hazards involved 1) DeSCribe speri,il c;iiiergency sc:rvices that mibht he rcquired Uullc:. 2) Propnsecl ineasures to reduce or control enviroiiineiital t-lealth hazaicls. it'any. None b Noise 1) What tyres oF noise exist iry [he area whicli niay afl'ect your {n•oject (for example: 'T'ra1rc, ecluiiimenc, opciation, other)? "I'he traffic nouse thnl exists will nc't affect tlie.prc7nosecl uiotcct 2) What ojres and levels of iioise would be creared by or associated with tlle praject on ashc»t-term oC 1 Iqlii'-term basis (for cxamplc: trat`fic, construc(ion, operrition, olher)? Iiiclicate what linurs noise woultl coi»e fi•om thc sile. Sliorr'I'erm - Uoise (i•om Goustructiaii durinii, not7nal work hours I._on.-- '1'ei7ii - N-tinor tia1'fic noise fi•om the i-csidence. tipol..uic L'nrirumment°iI Urdinuncc(:hec:klisr 11:tec 13 o1*21 ~ B. k,N1JlRQN114CNT.1L CL1:MLN`['S (Cuntinurd): 3 3) I'roposed measiirc lo recluce or control noise impacts, if wiy: NlA s. t.,ANn ANn SUoRLLIvr: Usc It. What is tlie cun•ent eise of the site anci iidjaec:nt piopEC-ties? "I'here is one reside»ce cuirentlu on the site aIthouLh inost of the sire is vac:a»t tielc1. Ta the tiorth is re,Sitientia! (UR-3.5) ii11CI rU fI1C SOl1Ih IS 111tYeCI "LOfiH1,L' UR-22. B-2 and B-i. To the west is residcrilial (UR-3,5) anci to the cmst is residerltial /vacant field (U(:-3.5). b. t-tas [he sile been usecl far agriculture? If so, clcscribc. No. c. Deticribe any sh ucfures on tlie sitc. There is a sinule farnilv iesidence on the northwest corner of'the pi►rcels irrvatverl in the -r.one clyariue. d. Will aiiy siriictures be ciemolished? If so, whiclt? Ycs - The iiousc aiid finv oitt buildines on the site. e. Wh1t is the current zoning ctiLssification of the site7 U 1Z-3. S Svc7k:ini• (°nvir<~nmcnt:►I Ordhii:trtcc C:hccklist 1'.1gc 14 OI'21 ~ • ' ~ 13. f::1~'\'IROVMI:N`('AL EI..I?ti'lI?V'fS (Cnniinucd): Mint is the c«n-ent Coinprchensive Pla» desiLnation of t1tc; sitc? l.lrlran. 9. lf applicaUle, what is thc current slioreline master p`rogrrim designation or the 5ite? Nlt>. It 1-Ias nizy part ofthe site been classified as ail "environmeittally sciisitive" m-ea? I f so, speci ly. N o. i. =lpproximatcly how many pcople woulcl reside or wnrk in the completed prajcc:t? "I-he total nuiliber of resicieiice will varv based on the nlHnned 195 u,iits. I'lie cocal nuiiiUer of ueoulc: that Nvoulcl %vork oii the site .irc 4 fiill tiine and ihev would ieside oii site ns well. ~ .i. Appioaiinntely liOW IYIZny people wo«tcl ihe complered project displace? Tiie iaroqosed vrotect ti►otilcl disnlace the neonle residint-, in the smule familv IioiYie currentl>> on fhe site k. Pi-oraoseCi measurc:s to avoid or reciuce displacement impacts, it' any. None_ l. f'roposed iiieasures to cnsure the propasal is compFitible witli existiiig find piojc:cted Ihntl uses anci plarts, it any: The re-ionc allaws ('mr tr.iiisitimn ofthc U12-22, 13-2 aiycl C3-3 zonina to the soulh and the UIZ-7 anc! UI:- 3.55 rniiinu, [h,it exisl oiY Ihe othr;r sicles of the site. SpoI::inc• 11m iro»mrnt;tl C7rclin:inCc Chccklist Rmw 15 of'21 1~. CNV1RONMI:NTAL ELENIENTS (Cnntinucd): 9. {-IOUSI NG ;t. Approxiiiiately hoNv many uiiits woulcl bc: pro<<icied, irany'' inclicatc; wltcllier hi6h, Utiddle, or tow-1i1C0tY)E: llOL1S111g. "1'he current ulans consist of anuroxiinatelv 2/3 af tlie 9.1 ac,res to be develoPed as iyioderate inconie iii«ltifamilv (120 unitsl ancl the remainine l/.i would be develoPed as seuior housiiit" (75 Li»>rs). b. Approximately hpw many units, if any; wa«Id be eliininatecl? lndicate whctlier higl1, Nliddle, o► low-iticome housirin. Une itiiddle incoinc liause. . c. C'roposcd ineasurc;s to reduce or control liousinb impacts, ifany: Nc»>c, 10. r1E5'i'tlETICS a. W1i11 is the tallest hei6ht of wiy proposed structure(s), iiot includingZntennas, Nvhat is tlie principal eateriur building materia1(s) proposed? 2'!~ stories (38-') wood. composites will be used on the cxterior of the apartYnent buildines. b. Wliat views in tlic iinineriiale viciiiity would hc aItereti or obshuctctl`7 None, c I'roposed measures to recluce or control aesthciiC nnpacts, if any,. I'eriiiietc;r hinclscmPing, anci 2'/2 SfOtv 1117X1117U111 I)UIId111L' IICIaI11S. Spok:in4 I:iirir~~~inyc:►it.if Onlin.111c.c C:liecklist Rvc 16 e.if 21 EvVlIZONlYiT:iYTAI. C:L.L"AiCN'CS (Cuntinucd): I 1. I.ll;ll'1' ;1ND CLAKI: ;z. wliat type of 1igh1 or glare will the proposal procl«ee? What time of c1a>> would it Ntainly occur? Niiniinal alarc; mav occur from windows The occurreiice of thz Rlare will v<<r/ detaenclina O11 llle 11117eUt' elavancl vear. Law level liehtim: will be used for safety and securitv. b. Could liglit or glarc frnrn the finisheci pr•oject be a satety hazard or interfcre witli vicws? Not likelv. :ts t)ie liahtine, will nrimartlv be dawn casl hehlinPI.- c. Wbat existing ofi=site soiirces nf libht or glarc may a(`fect yolir proposal? Noite. d_ Proposed measuces tn reduce or cantrol liblit and gIare imnacts, i f arly: Down cast lmlitint will urimtirilv be used lor the proposed oroiect. 12. Rr.-CRCATlUN Fi. Wliat clc;sibnatc:ci aiid iiiformal recleatio~ial opportumities ai-c in the iiiinic,cliate vieiiiity9 None in thc immediate viciiiitv. la. Would thc rrnposetl piolect clisplace 1ny eAistingrecreatloiial uses? !!'so, descnUe No. >pu4.;►ttt: I:+iviro~mncmal (_)rdi»;tncr (:Itccklist I'.tgu 17 vf*2l B. 1:NN'112QNi%ILN'TAL CLLi11EV'I'S (Cuntinucil): c. {'ronosccl me7sures ta rt',(IllCC AI' COIIICQI 1illpaC1S Oll 1'CCI'G.ill(111, includi»g iecreation Upportunitits to lie provided by thc ljrolect or tapplicant, if, any. A>i in fonnal i cc►calion are7 will be provicled for the resid4ncc near Ihe center ul'thc si(c 13. I1 IS'1'ORIC t\Nn GUL'1'URAL PRESCRVA'I'IQN a. Ai'e tltere aiiy p11ces or ohjects listed on, ar proposed tar, national, state, or local Piescrratioii rc:bisters. kno«m lo l.ie oii or next to thc site? !f so, betletally cleseribe. R'one l:nown. I) G4nerally c9escribe nriy itinclmarks or cvidcTicc of"hisEoric, archaeolobical, sc;icnti f ic or ctiltural importarice knnwii Io be on or next ta the sitc. toiic: known c 1'ruposecl nica5ures to reduce or coritrol iinpacist if any: NI A 14. TriANSIIOR'r,►'rioN :i. ldenfify pubtic strc;ets and highways scivi»g the site and describc proposed acccss to thc existinr,~ s1reet systeiti. Show ori site plrims, ii'aiiy. Thc site fi•onts VaIlcvwav Avcnuc which leads to Lonklin Raad le5s tl»n a mile to the east. '1`he Ntain Avenue rieflit of %vav Iies 10 tlle ,outl) of the site with aonruxiniatelu 805' fnon- accc5sihl4l fi-ontaLC fnr additionai infai7-nation see site nlzn and traffic stuclv b, ls site currc:iitly sii vecJ by OUbIIC trFiriSil? Il'iiol, wliat is tlie tipproxiinate distc-ince fQ IIIE IlCal'CSl IT9t1Sfi S1Aj)7 No --'I'lie closetit stot) i, at Vallevwav <<ncl Sullivan auuroxinia1clv milc east. Sn<ak.inu F:nv tronmvnml l'arclin,tttic:r Cliecl.li5t I'.iuc: 18 oi'21 . ~ . ~ B. CNVIRONMLN'1'r11, f?LCiti1ENTS (Cuntiwicll): c. 1-jow iyiany parkin}; spaces would the complcteci project have? t-loNv many Woulcl the pioject cliiiiinnte'? Amm•oximatelN• ?GO snaces will be cc•catetl(tiee site plan fc7i- additional parl:iiii► inforniation) Tlic e-otitinL varl:iim, for ilic siiiale-familv resiclence will be cliininated (apuroxim7telv cl. Will tlic proposal requirc any ncw ruflcis ur streets, or impr•ovements to existing roads or shcets; not iiicluding driveways? Ii'so, betierally describe (inclic;aie wiic;ther publie or private:). No iiew rnacls Qr stieets Would be reouired. Some iinnrovements to Vallevwav mav be reqLiired bv tlie Snokillle Cb11111v C'naineerina Denamment alonL the fiont of the site e Wi11 the project use (or acclir in the iinmecliate viciiiity ot) water, rail, or air Tr•anspormim? lf so, g4ner.illydescribe, yo I: I-IoNv many vehicular ti ilis pcr clay woulcl be gener<ittcl by 1hC Cn171pICIc(I pIOJCCI? If' l:tiown. 111clicate wlie,i peal, vOIllI11CS wCIUI(I UCCUt• Sce traffic rcuoiY 9. f'roposecl mensures wt rcducc or concrol transportntion impacts; if :lTly. Scc traCfic rmc.~rt. 15. PUniC SrRViCCs 41 Would the projcct resiilt in an iiicreased need for public serviCes (f'or example: I-1r,c protectinn, pnlice protection, Iiealth cate, schools, other)? lf so, bencrally descrilie 'I'he incicase necded wiil be incicnic;ntal and will be suQnailecl bv the ne\vlv ee»erated tax (i 0m thc projert ~~~ul..tn~ I:ii~•u~nii~~•~~t.~) Urdii►.uiLc (:I1cil.liS1 1'.it;e N uf* 21 . I3. T:I\VIRUNl11E1\TAL CI..EMEti'1'S (Cnntinucil): b. 1'ropnsed measures to reciuce or control clircct impncts on public services, if n►iy Plinsmt; of the molec;t will take t3lacc 16. U'i u.n'i t;s n. Cir ~iities curi~entiy a~~f~il, ea e sife. eleckricit ~tural ba (;D~efiise Scrx7re, leleplinn , saititmy sc;wer, septic systei i, other. b. Describe tlie utilities that arc pioposed for thc projecl, the utility providing die Seivice, tind the general constructiori ac;livities on the site or in the immediate viciiiily which miglit bc; needed. . Watcr ancl power will be nrovidcd bv Vera Water and i'awer. Phone.movided bv US West. Avista will vrovide uas i('neecled and SPokane Counh, will providc s4initflrv sewer which was rectntlv extenelccl tliroualt the 4ite. . C. SIGNATLIRr ~ l, thc tintlcisiLnect, swear under the penalty of perjtii)► tlial the above responses arc macie truthfiilly auci to the liest uf »iy I:itawleclgc (alsa miderstand tliat, should theie be any %villtul misrcpresentation ar willfiil lack oC fiill tfisclosut e on my part= the a,eiicv may withclr,iw any tietei7niciation of non-si<vnificanc:e that it miblic issue in reliaucc upun lhia cliec:klist. UAte: Y-]2~11Z400 1'roponeut: !'ropotient: (Plensc tync or nrint) (Si nature) Atido-ess: caty, st;,te, ziP• .~MYAOT__ . k~S n qc1 Zt)( o Phone: 1)~j?Q~ "o1too 1'ei-son conillletiilg the form Q L~ ~~~.'~~~~Ll~i ' ~ Uate_ (g to~ ~ !'hone. Spnk.im F.n6:•r►ninenml Qrdin;►nce: Clie:ckkt 1';it;c 20 qf'? 1 . FOiz sTArF ust: c~~LY S1afTMel11UL1(!;) Rt'.VIeWIIIL Cl1LCkIISI: [3ascd nn (his stitf(' ieview of tlle eiivironrnental cliec:l:list aiiti othc,r pertinent iiitormation, tltc. st;iff. A. Conciudes tliat tficre are no probable signilicaiit adverse iinpacts amd recomme»ds a E3 Conciudcs that probable si};riificaiit 7dverse c;nviionmerital imp:tcts do exist !or tlie ciai•ient C. Coizcludes tliat tlicre are probable sib»ilica»t adverse eiivu•onmetltal iinpacts and recommcnds ricrErt•i'U FCC SCliEnULE ['QR f1I.INC T'CC ~~~u1,ane L'l1la1P(a(1111C(li:~l C..)rclin iitct (__licLklisc I',wc'I o1'21 DuRYCA & ASSOCIAT Es Laitd Surveying & Mappin$ June 27, 2000 Tob No oo-4a9 L1CGAL DESCRIPTION roR cERTiriCATE or ExEMPTIoN AI'N 45133.1011 A portian of the of Tracts 25 and 26, Vera, according to tlle Plat tliereof recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane Couilty VVashinbton, and being described as follows: IIEGINNING at the Northeast corner of the East Izalf of tlle West half of Tract 26, hereinabove described; thence alotig the Nortll Iine oF said parcel, North 89°45'S0" West 163.62 feet to the Northwest corner of said parcel; tlience along the West line of said Parcel, South 00°27'45" East 344.79 feet to a line p4u-allel witEi and 268 00 feet Nor•therly of, being measured at right angles to, the North line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Spokarie Caunty for Main Avenue by Deed recorded June 23, 1958, under Auditor's rile No. 54416808, said poinl being the TItUE PO1N'T OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along said West line, South 00°27'45" East 288.02 feet to the North line of Main Avenue; thence along said North line, South 89°44'13" East 810.53 feet to the East line of the West tiaif of said Tract 25; thence along said East line, North 04°41'26" West 613.23 feet to the Nortlieast corner of said West half of Tract 25; thence along the Nortil line of said Tract 25 thence along the North line of said parcel, Nortli 89°45'SO" West 75.01 feet to a]ine parallel wieh mld 75 00 feet Westerly of, being measured at right angles to, the East line af said West half of Tract 25; thencc alons said parallcl line, South 00°4l'26" East 195.02 feet to a line parallel with acid 195.00 feet Southerly of, being measured at riglit angles to, the said North line of Tract 25; tlience along said parallel line, Nortli 89°45'S0" West 242.54 feet the East line of said Tract 26; thence along said West line, Nortli 00°35S7" V`Jest 195.02 feet to the Norcheast corner thereof; thence along the Nortli line of said Tract 26 Nortli 89°45'SO" West 327.24 feet to the said true point of beginning of this description, and containing 9.01 acres of land, more or less. `,~GN p W~ • ♦~~t~,o '►'p'o. , , ~v : lv ~ • DURYEA & ASSOCIATES Land Surveying & Mapping 1 • June 27, 2000 Job No. 00-449 LEGAL DESCRIPTION , FOR CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION APN 45133.1011 A portion of the of Tracts 25 and 26, Vera, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County Washington, and being described as follows: BEGIrJNING at the Northeast corner of the East half of the West half of Tract 26, hereinabove described; thence along the North line of said parcel, North 89°45'S0" West 163.62 feet to the Northwest corner of said parcel, thence along the West line of said Parcel, South 00°27'45" East 344.79 feet to a line parallel with and 268.00 feet Northerly of, being measured at right angles to, the North line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Spokane County for Main Avenue by Deed recorded June 23, 1958, under Auditor's File No. 54416808, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along said West line, South 00°27'45" East 288.02 feet to the North line of Main Avenue; thence along said North line, South 89°44'13" East 810.53 feet to the East line of the West half of said Tract 25; thence along said East line, North 00°41'26" West 613 23 feet to the Northeast corner of said West half of Tract 25; thence along the North line of said Tract 25 thence along the Nocth line of said parcel, North 89°45'S0" West 75.01 feet to a line parallel with and 75.00 feet Westerly of, being measured at right angles to, the East line of said West half of Tract 25; thence along said parallel line, South 00°41'26" East 195.02 feet to a line parallel with and 195.00 feet Southerly of, being measured at right angles to, the said North line of Tract 25, thence along said parallel line, North 89°45'S0" West 242.54 feet the East line of said Tract 26; thence along said West line, North 00°35S7" West 195.02 feet to the Northeast corner thereof, thence along the North line of said Tract 26 North 89°45'S0" West 327.24 feet to the said true point of beginning of this description, and containing 9.01 acres of land, more or less. •~w o • : co . . . tA~ ..ar ! . ~/Z?/lz) r s ~ ~ ~ I' C~ I < f~ N C? o u UIVf51nN On IiNCiNEfRINC I1ND ROADS ' A l)IVlSION Ol' TI1l: 1'Ut11.IC WC1110 'AR1'MI'N'~.Of/V~ Wiiliam A. ohns, 1'.E., Coiml Iin inccr Q ~ i:~81 Y s ,?Op~ k OPA AGIZEEIVYI{,NT TO PAI' rErS ~Nk/No ~l~ 1?NGiNl~t"it'S ~1~;1tt;rN1I~N'' NU11~II3~'sIt ~ . 'i'liis :1gCCL'll]CIII I1ClWL'C11 SOOk-a>ic Coiiii(y ancl (A &W, -tn.mrcrWIIOSC Ill(Cfe5( ttl IIIC pCO;CCt IS ~C) L") ng I' d is eilterect into this day of ti if This agreement is npplicnUle to the nroject knowti as:';t'n ilr ~!+farfi L rtJ L 1 C C k~tm ~4 ~ ~ Thac thc incliviclunis tincl parties nailiecl lierein ;►s hpving nn iiitcrest in tiie abovc clescribed yirorerty ar project asrec to tlic foltowiiig: 1. Itc:imburse Spokane Couiity for project rev:ew and iijspection fees as specifiecl in Chapter 9.14 of the Spoka»e COtlI1Iy COdC. The fees will Ue bnsecl oii actual salary costs incurrecl Uy Spokliie County for nroject rcviews and i or inspections p1us a tcn perccnt acli»inislrntive chargc, nncl will be billecl monthly as nccrued. Any billing amounts cfue, including any expenses incurred in the colicctiori of nii ovcrcltic nccount, inust be linid nrior to the Cotinty's ncccptniica oF thc pro,jcct Cor filiiig. lf 1 rcoject is aprroved nnd/or f lecl willi n balatice still owing, llie uilpaid Ualance slizill 1}e paici within 30 clays of the invoice clate. 2. Thc uiiclersignecl agrees that these fe;es are due ancf payable upon receipt of tlie billiii6 as speciliecl ,ibove. 3. Any invnices not paicl witlyin 30 clays of thc invaice clate will be eoiisiclered deliiicJuent. If aliy outstalulin6 ballnce on the account ror tliis project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice dtite, iio i'urtlier reviews of thc project docunie»ts will be eoiiducted until tlie aitire nccouilt balanee is paicl. Aiiy balancc oii (lie accounl for (Iiis pi'OJCCt IlOI OFl1d 1Vllillll GS dayS OC lI1C 1l1VOICC d1lC IllaY result in Iegal action or tlie i»itintion of other collection rrocec{ures, including rcterr:►l (o n collcctioii :►gency. Tlle Spoilsor wili he liablc for -ttny anci ali exrcnscs inc«rrecl by the Cot>»ty for the collcction oC ovcr(iue accola»ts. 4. 'I'1ie iiioiitlily bitling shaulci Ue scnt to thc attcntiun oC: rl A ht r_ : 1- . ~ n) T P C QSD K) ADDRL•SS: -LD.IQ L . 5UtonnLw) DQ_ Cl'1'Y, STATE: S P~A IU j: ,1, )A ZI{' CODC: Co c3,oLp PI-iONC 10c"Aa ' asa5 Pl-10NC /l 2: - ~QQ f -A X ! tinclcrsc;iiicl diat f':tilttre co pay tlicsc ('ccs m<<y ccsult i« clciay in coinrlctioii Qr npprovaf of thc projcct or othcr poSSible sanctions. 0(!' tltis fec abrc:cmerie is coinpletc:cl by soi»eotie ollicr tli<<n clie S'ponsor (i.e., tlie project ow»cr or a principhl in the tirm spo»soring the project), sucli as tlic E-ngineer designisig the project, tlien wriue,i nuthorization from tlic SPo»sor speciffcnlJy nutliorjzjitb tlic Agenl to execu(c tliis Fee rkbrceniciil is attacl~ccl ta tii' ec eeineitt. SfGNA''Llitl: [3y: . ~ S~e (t'ttlN•l' td/1M l:) ~ Itl?'I'UItN l'1,LLU11' COi'1"l'Q SI'4KANE COUN't'1' I:NC INItS k\i\-agrrrf«.tIox 318/91) 1t12fi 11' llru;iclwa3► rlvc Spalt:►iie WA 9926(1•0170 (Sfl)} ~177-3600 1~tM (SU)) 4177-22113 '1'1)1): (509) 32•1-3166 / ~ SPOKANE COLJN'I'Y DIYISION OF BUILDING AND t:_;JDL ENFOR', 'NT ~ 1026 WEST BROADWAY~AYENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675 SITE INFORMATION PRU CT INFORMATION Site Addras: 16110 E VALLEYWAY AVE roject Numbar: 00005746 Inv: 1 Issue Datc: VERADALE, WA 99037 trmit IIse: ZE-ZO-UO submittal Parce! Number: 45133.1011 Subdivision: UNKNOWN Appticsnt: SONRISE I.AND LLC Block: Lot: 11219 E Si1NDOWN DR Zoning: UR-3 Ucban Resideatia1 3.5 SPOKANE WA 99206- Phone: (SOg) 928-0160 Grani Person Owner. SONRISE LAND LLC Contact: 11219 E Stmdown Dr Address: 11219 E SiJNDOWN DR Spoksne, Wa 99246-9635 Phone: (509) 928-0160 SPOKANE, WA 99206- ;etbacks - Front Lctt: Right: Rear. Inspector DAN HOWARD Water Dist: Grnnp Name: ZE-20-00 Pro j ect Name: PERMrr(s) Zone Chon,ee contructor. ~cenm 11= E14vIItoNMENi'AI, xEVIEw s75.00 EN(3DtEERS xEViEw s200.00 REZ0NE:RS,LTR7,UR12,UR22 9 S1,701.00 PRE-,NPP CO;v'FERENCE S56.00 [!'ITI_1TIES REVIEW S100.00 Totnl Pcrntit Fre: 52,132.00 PAYME:Yi' SLJMMARY Page 1 of 1 NpTEs PF.RhtIT Prucessed By: WRIGHT, RAE ; . Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA Tran Date Receipt # Pavment Amt ~ 07/10/2000 5492 $2,132.00 ; Total Fees AmauntPaid AmountOwing $2,132.00 $2,132.00 S0.00 ~ ~ - , Spokane County Public Works Department Divison of Building & Planning Receipt ReceipllVumber: 5492 Customer Number Projects Ful! Proiect Nhr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt OwinQ PAID P»it 00005746 1 $2,132.00 $2,132.00 $2,132.00 $2,132.00 Tota1: $2,132.00 $2,132.00 $2,132.00 $2,132.00 Miscellaneous Items Totol PAID: $2,132.00 Tender Type Check Acct BQlance CC Nbr 97 Date TENDERED Checkl 1036 1,845.00 Check2 1040 ~ 287.00 Total TEIVDERED: 2,132.00 Over / (Short) $0.00 Change $0.00 1Yotes: TraR Dnte / Time: 07110/20 1" By: GWende Logo,r User: gwendel StaliUrr: Ot-erricle R,, : Priated: 0711 Dl100010:03:18 A,N Pnge 1 oj 1 . i I e_ I i hd . s ?V i I j ~ i. "mm i ai i 4,? ss td} . _ { r ra _ k f 1 33 3 3 ' i 'y:, a R., & M t .r9 ap r e '.~3 s ~ ~b ' y, " ~ . , ' w, ..ash ~ . M j 3`. ld T , "^,.i w 8 ~y ,a r , ~ , } a ~ ~ . ,a ~ ; d . , ~ a ~ .R ~ D x ...1. .d r . ~ w_,. . •~w: . . „ ~ . ~...e,..w..;, , .rv. . . . " .G... ~ r $ E . ; :d . ~ . . . . , n s, ~ w~¢ . ,..r , , r ; w. E.... py ti . p ,gym ~ . a. G . S a K ~ s ":p.. i ~ i P r^Y p MC ~ µ ~ ~ . ~ t. s d ...'4 ~ .s war ~w.. 2.'.:: t.«^. „..::a .w~ ~ a ~ b ' 8 °,.A. w "i k ~ z., 6 k.P....^.!.!..Vp S.µ ~ JJ 7 6 4 P R