ZE-0002-01
J ~
~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
RE: Zone Reclassification from the ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Community Business (B-2) and ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Regional Business (B-3) Zones to ) AND DECISION
the Regional Business (B-3) Zone; )
Applicant: Dave and Wanda Jeffries )
File No. ZE-2-01 )
1. S Y OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassification from the Community Business (B-2) and
Regional Business (B-3) zones to the B-3 zone, on approximately .77 acres, for an automotive
repair facility and those uses allowed in the B-3 zone.
Decision: Approval, subject to conditions.
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
H. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT
A. GeneralInformation:
ApplicantlSite Owner: Dave and Wanda Jeffries, 525 South Cavalier Court, Greenacres,
WA 99016
Site Address: 16911 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue, approximately 400
feet west of Flora Road, in the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
Parcel Number: County Assessor's tax parcel no. 45134.1768
Zoning: The northerly part of the site is zoned Community Business (B-2), while the
southerly part is zoned Regional Business (B-3). The site is also located within the Aquifer
Sensitive Area Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Zoning Code.
Comprehensive Plan: Major Commercial. The subject property is also located within the
Priority Sewer Service Area, Aquifer Sensitive Area, and Urban Impact Area designated by the
Plan.
IUGA: The property is located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated
by the County pursuant to the Growth Management Act.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 1
~
Environmental Review: The Division of Planning issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on April 6, 2001.
Site Description: The site is 33,387 square feet in size, "L"-shaped, and flat in topography.
The subject property is improved with a 560-square foot residence and a small, detached
accessory structure. The site is generally 112 feet wide and 248.55 feet long, except for a 100-
foot by 37-foot wide leg that extends and provides ingress/egress to Sprague Avenue.
Surrounding Conditions: Sprague Avenue, Flora Road and Sullivan Road in the area are all
designated as Principal Arterials by the County Arterial Road Plan. Sprague Avenue comprises a
major commercial and traffic comdor in the area. The Major Commercial category extends
along Sprague Avenue in the area. The land along Sprague Avenue near the site is zoned B-3, B-
2, Neighborhood Business (B-1) or Light Industrial (I-2), and developed for an assortment of
commercial uses. This includes some recent rezones to the B-3 zone.
Project Description: The site plan of record dated January 22, 2001 illustrates development of a
5280 square foot automobile repair shop, with 4 bays. The shop includes approximately 650 square
feet of office space for the business. The existing structures will either be demolished or relocated to
another site. The site plan shows the north 25 feet of the site as a gravel area, with paved parking, a
drainage swale and landscaping making up the remainder of the subj ect property.
A total of 21 off-street parking spaces are illustrated, which is less than the 25 spaces required by the
County Zoning Code, based on the square footage and proposed use of the structure. A 5-foot strip
of Type III landscaping is proposed along the south boundary of the site and along its Sprague
Avenue frontage. The project would be served by public sewer and water.
B. ProceduralInformation:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zorung Code Chapters 14.402 and 14.628.
Hearing Date and Location: Apri125, 2001, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: Apri16, 2001
Posted: Apri18, 2001
Published: April 6, 2001
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294
Testimony:
Deanna Walter
Division of Planning
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 2
.
Items Noticed: Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, County Zoning Code,
County Code, County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management, and County Arterial Road Plan maps. County Resolution Nos.
99-0261 (revising Road Standards), 97-0874 (revising interim regulations for County IUGAs),
97-0321 (adopting interim regulations for County NGAs), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of
Procedure), 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance), and 85-0900 (adopting Zoning Code, and
Program to Implement Zoning Code). Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report and in
decision.
III. LAND USE ANALYSIS/
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. Approval criteria
The County Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Hearing Examiner to grant, deny
or grant with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to
make a rezone application compatible with the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan and development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment "A",
paragraphs 7(d) and section 11.
In considenng a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that 1) there is
no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridge v.
Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462, 573 P.2d 359 (1978); and Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wn. App.
840, 899 P.2d 1290 (1995).
Some Washington cases have dispensed with the changed circumstances requirement where
the rezone specifically implemented the policies of the comprehensive plan. Bjarnson v. Kitsap
County, supra; Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish County, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371
(1983); and Tugwell v. Kittitas County, 90 Wn. App. 1, 8, 951 P.2d 272 (1999).
A comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation. Only
general conformance with a comprehensive plan is required for approval of a rezone proposal.
Citizens forMount Vernon v. City ofMount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997); and Cathcart v.
Snohomish County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Where the policies of a comprehensive plan
conflict with zoning regulations, the provisions of the zoning code will usually be construed to
prevail. See Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); Cougar Mt. Assocs. v.
King County, 111 Wn.2d 742, 755-57 (1988); and 1Vagatani Bros. v. Commissioners, 108 Wn.2d
4773, 480 (1987).
Section 14.402.020 of the County Zoning Code authorizes amendments to the Code based
on several grounds, without differentiating between amendments to the text of the Zoning Code
and amendments to the official zoning map. Zoning Code 14.402.020(1) authorizes the Code to
be amended if the change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental
to the public welfare...". Zoning Code 14.402.020(2) authorizes a Code amendment where
"[c]hanges in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 3
,
modification of this Code...". These are the most relevant criteria for consideration of a site-
specific rezone application.
Section 14.100.104 of the County Zoning Code states that the provisions of the Code shall
be interpreted to carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and
the general plans for physical development of the county adopted by the Board of County
Conunissioners. Zoning Code 14.100.106 indicates that when the provisions of the Zoning Code
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans and development regulations, the
more restrictive provisions shall govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code
provisions will be met as a minimum.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the decision guidelines stated in the various
sections of the Plan should be used as a resource and guide for approving specific land uses.
B. The nroposed rezone, as conditioned, generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan;
bears a substantial relationship to and will not be detrimental to the public health, safetv and
welfare; is supported bv a substantial change of circumstances in the area since the site was last
zoned; and complies with the Spokane County Zoning Code and other applicable development
re2ulations.
The site is designated within the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan.
Such category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of commercial uses,
specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses directly related to
major throughways. Major Commercial areas typically require a full line of public services and
utilities, including public sewer. The Major Commercial category indicates that commercial
developments should be buffered or spatially separated to protect adj acent areas. Comprehensive
Plan, Section 6, Goa16.1, Objective 6.1.a and Decision Guideline 6.1.2.
The southerly portion of the site is zoned Regional Business (B-3) zone, while the northerly
portion is zoned Community Business (B-2). The applicant proposes to rezone the entire site to
the B-3 zone, for development of an automobile repair shop.
The B-3 zone is intended to implement the Major Commercial category of the
Comprehensive Plan, including policies that encourage commercial development along Principal
Arterials and the establishment of regional-serving commercial uses. Zoning Code 14.628.100.
The proposed rezone clearly implements such policies, since it is located along a Principal
Arterial and B-3 uses are intended for the site. The proposal is also served by a high level of
public services and facilities, including modern utilities and public sewer. The project site is also
located inside the interim urban growth area (NGA) boundaries designated by the County
pursuant to the State Growth Management Act.
No opposition was expressed to the proposal during the public hearing process. Sprague
Avenue in the area comprises a major commercial and traffic corridor through the Spokane
Valley area of the county. The portion of Sprague lying east of Sullivan Road is experiencing
new commercial development, prompted by the extension of public sewer and improvements to
Sprague Avenue east of Sullivan. B-3 and B-2 zoning are the predominant zoning in the area
along Sprague Avenue, with a trend toward more B-3 zoning. The land lying south of the site is
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 4
zoned Light Industnal (I-2). The I-2 zone authonzes the development of B-3 zones uses,
provided such uses are developed according to the development standards of the B-2 zone.
The development standards of the B-3 zone ensure adequate buffering for the project in
relation to adj acent uses. The proposal will provide regional business services to the growing
population in the Spokane Valley. The Examiner agrees with the Staff Report that the project is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and will serve the public welfare._
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane
County Code have been met. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the Determination of
Nonsignificance issued by the Division of Building and Planning. No adverse comments were
received from the reviewing public agencies. As conditioned, the proposal will not have more
than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing of
change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. County
Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993).
Recent cases hold that changed circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed
rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan. See Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wn.
App. 840, 846 (1995); Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish County, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-
371 (1983); and Tugwell v. Kittitas County, 90 Wn. App. 1, 8, footnote 6(1997). As discussed
above, the project generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.
Changed conditions supporting the proj ect include improvements to Sullivan Road east of
Sullivan Road; the extension of public sewer in the area, rezones to the B-3 zone west of the site
during the 1990s, increased population growth in the Valley area, increased traffic along Sprague
Avenue and Sullivan Road, and designation of the site within the County's IUGA boundaries.
IV. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law above, the above rezone application
is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies specified below.
Any conditions of public agencies that have been added or significantly revised by the
Examiner are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 5
,
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant,"
which term shall include the owners, developers and users of the property, and their heirs,
assigns and successors.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, the Aquifer Sensitive
Area (ASA) Overlay zone, and all other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning
Code as amended.
3. The applicant shall develop the subject property in substantial accordance with the site plan
of record dated January 22, 2001, subject to compliance with conditions of approval and
development standards. Minor variations, consistent with conditions of approval and
development standards, may be permitted administratively by the County Division of Planning in
accordance with Section 14.504.040 of the County Zoning Code. All other revisions must be
approved by the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to a public hearing on a change of conditions
application.
4. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
lighting and signage plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permit.
5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
6. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed
as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the
conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
"The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by
the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on June 18, 2001, imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. ZE-02-01 is available for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Division of Planning."
7. Prior to release of any building permits, a specific landscape plan, planting schedule and
provisions for the maintenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee
shall be submitted, along with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project.
The landscape plan shall conform to chapter 14.806 (Landscaping and Screening Standards) of
the County Zoning Code. A 5-foot wide Type III landscaping strip is required adjacent to
Sprague Avenue, pursuant to Section 14.806.040 (2)(b). Landscaping shall be installed and
maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
8. The applicant sball obtain a Certificate of Exemption pursuant to Section 12.100.110(5) of
the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, prior to issuance of a building pernut.
9. The Spokane County Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice, which specifies a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The Title Notice shall state the following:
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 6
.
a. A stnp of property 10 feet in width from the existing nght-of-way is reserved for future
acquisition area for additional road right-of-way width along Sprague Avenue.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the
above improvements are within the area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense
when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, unit acquired, shall be private property and may be used as
allowed in the zone, except that any unprovements (such as landscaping, parking, surface
drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at
the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future
acquisition.
10. The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized
by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type,
occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2. The applicant shall submit drainage and access plans for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage
plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable. Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a •
construction or building pernut.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 7
5. The County Engineer has designated a 5-Lane Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. No roadway
improvements are required along the Sprague Avenue frontage of this development. County
Road Project No. 2676 constructed Sprague Avenue along the frontage of this proposal.
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing
pavement on Sprague Avenue.
8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane County Resolution No. 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road nght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be
completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the
County Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a 130-foot wide Principal
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the
plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, a strip of property 10 feet in width along the
Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve, as provided in the County Division of Planning
conditions. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial
Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
12. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work.
13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 8
~
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Departrnent of Health.
4. A public sewer system shall be made available for the project and individual service shall
be provided. The use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized.
5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the areawide Public Sewer System shall be constructed.
A sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical andlor
estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer
fees.
2. The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities, under
separate cover, only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the private
sewer system design and connections for review and approval. Commercial developments shall
submit historical and/or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal.
3. Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance
of the sewer construction permit.
4. - Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance
of sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development.
5. Any water service for this proj ect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All applicable air pollution regulations shall be met. See memo dated 2-7-01 from
SCAPCA in Division of Planning File No. ZE-2-01
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 9
DATED this 18`hday of June, 2001
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
;~rx CZJ
Miclfael C. Dempsey, WSB 82~''s'
64--
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the
Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification and accompanying SEPA
determination is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's
written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9)
indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the board of county commissioners within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
the decision.
This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant, and to other parties by regular
mail, on June 18, 2001. Depending on which appeal period referenced above legally applies,
and counting to the next business day when the last day for appeal falls on a weekend or
holiday, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER JUNE 28, 2001 OR JULY 2, 2001.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period
with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be inspected
during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at
the cost set by Spokane County.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2-01 Page 10
('no)rct titatus :lttive ENGINEER'S RE'VIEV4' SHEET ~
Vs Ciuilt Ylans Rrrrived Rezone File ZE••0002-01 -ul
Itusd F'tans Approvccl i'ompanian I'ilcs:
Vcw Road Stun+iards 5-15-95 Mylur a.
ficletcd Filrs.
Heuring: 04125/3001 3:30 13uilding UeT►t:
1'cchnic2l Review: 42f22i2001 l: t S
Hsrvard Rd Plnn
f'rclinun,trv Rcvicw; T>'': _ l.arge Lot [31d~ Square Frrt
Llntc Rrcrivcd: 0210512001
No. Lots: No. Acres•
Yroject Name B-2 TO B-3 ALITOCRAFT
Sitc Addre.ss E. C'ONKL.IN. W F[_ORA, N. SpltA61.1i:.5. VALLf:Y WAY.SPELAGUE E, 16911
Appt)rnnt RUnge=1'o~%rship-Scrtzon -i-i - 25 - 13 PARCEI.(S): l lirst 20j
l.►w, c & Wancln Jet1i►t~ t'undi ltons 41uifed 45 114 i
[7ood "Lonc "
525 S. C'avalier C't Watrr Sourcc
t;REENACRES, WA 99016- Scwrt Saurct
Phonr (509) 92(r7002 (509) 424-$738 Schw1 Dis-t LI:
Fax 1 SfW) 924-5041 Firc Dist
f'none p►isl
Fng Biliing Owner
D$Ye & Wanda leffries f)avr &
525 S. Cnvulicr Ct S. Ca'. alier 0 Surveyor
~cott \ alenlinr
GRE-ENACR£S, WA 'Mplb-
c;fLEENACRES. WA 99016- Phcmc (509) 926-7002 i 500) 9: a.ti'.,R
Phonc (509) 926-7002 (509) 924•8738 ~0~►~ f:. c>'n.~
f~ax ( Fax (509)924-5041 SpUKAN~ ~4A 99223-
924-SQ41 Phonc (509) 4-18-2946
Stgned Namc: DAVE JEFFRIGS
I3uilding 477-3675 /Ytatming 477-7200 lEn~tinrer 477-3600 Contnct E3/P I)EANNA V4'AI.TER Cantact. Ena SC'OTT f:NGEL.IiARD
llate Submitted Description Initials
E:ng NCCd "I'ccltnically ComQlelc Eng Necd }iarvard Rd ltilitigation
Eng Nced Lhainage Plans Eag Need Tcaftic Analy3is i-rig Nerd Othrr ~
I29:'20u; I:ng Agrcx Pay Frrs Rcceitec! E-ttg Fina1 Ylat Fccs Gomplctrd
Eng Agree Priurity Fees Rtceivcd 0129I2001 Eng F'rrlim Plat Fcts Complctcd
Notice to PuWir ' Noticc to Public tt I ? a 6 C'urrpieteYi - ur Needs- to bc signrJ
~U yuUntfcs 77
• ' ' tlru,nagc itam calc„l;,ts,U
I k arsng. nace fkcision APp ~ Den Cand Appid DCC
-1;,pc:,icd to I3CC Dccision App Ucn Cond Appld Coun
Appealcd to Cuurt Drcisiun
.tampca Myl,►rs tU sun►u,► tsttn,~% ~
a.l'OS I r,t PIanS tn Se.rcrar-: i_ti;:r.,;~ ;
mar,r
l
• p~ ~
~
7
~
I 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
,
" File ZE-02-01
A I„1 III DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOMN,E COUNTY
HEARING DATE: April 25, 2001 @ 3:30 p.m. FILE ZE-02-01
PROJECT PLANNER: Deanna Walter, Associate Plannerd. I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone reciassification from Community Business (B-2) and Regional
Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) on approximately 77 acres for an automotive repair
facility and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
Project Data
Project Location and Address: The site is generally Iocated north of and adjacent to
Sprague Avenue approximately 400 feet west of
Flora Road in the SE %4 of the SE '/4 of Section 13,
Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
WA 16911 E Sprague Avenue
Parcel Number: ~ 45134 1768
OwneNApplicant: Dave and Wanda Jeffries
525 South Cavalier Court
Greenacres, WA 99016
(509) 926-7002
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Major Commercial (C)
Existing Zoning: Community Business (B-2) & Regional Business (B-
3)
Existing Land Use: The site currently has a house and detached
garage/shop The applicant states that these
structures will be removed and replaced with a 4-bay,
5280 sq ft automotive repair garage with office area
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:
• North: Land located north of the proposal is zoned Regional
Business (B-3), established in 1993 under ZE-42-93
Land use north of the subject site consists of a mini
storage and shop Property to the northeast is
vacant and zoned Community Business (B-2)
• South: Land located south of the proposal is zoned Regional
Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (I-2), across
e Sprague Avenue, established in 1991, previously
reclassified as Commercial (C), ZE-4-67, and
Restricted Industrial (RI), ZE-89-54 Land uses
south of the subject site consist of a barber shop
located adjacent to the proposal and a hardware
store on the south side of Sprague Avenue
ZE-02-01
Staff Report - Apnl 25, 2001 Public Heanng
.
o-
~
East: Land ~ocated east of the prapasal is zoned ba#h
Comrnunity Business (B-2) and RegiQnal Business
(13-3), established in 1991, prev~ously reclassified as
Commercial (C), ZE-60-42 and ZE-4-67 Land uses
east of the subject site consist of an espressa stand
and restaurant
• 1I'Yest: Land lacated west of the prQRasal is zoned Regional
Business (8-3), established in 1993 under ZE-42-93
Land uses west of the subject site consist af smafl
cammerciai businesses adjacent to the praper#y
kCnown Land Use Proposals and Land use applicatEOns approved within 'l~ mile af the
R,ecent Project Appravafs in the Ar+ea proposai include the foflowing
of this Projecte • Three preliminary plats/planned unit
developrnentslzone reclassifications Longview
PUa (PE-'i 870-OOIPUDE-U2-00), Shelley Lak~
PUD (PE-1750-94/PlJaE-04-94fZE-34l94), and
(PE-1 803A-961PLJaE-05-951ZE-46-96)
■ Preliminary short plat SP-1 069-96 vuas approve+d
an N1ay 6, 1998.
• Final short plat SP-1 153-197 was recarded on
November 5, 1997
• Final Binding 5ite Plan 6SP-74-00 was recorded
on .ianuary 5, 2001
■ Zona reclassification ZE-29-96 was approved on
- Octvber 30, 1996 an approximately 9 69 acres
, from Carnmunity Business (6-2) ta Regional
Business (8-3)
• Zane reclassification ZE-37-97 was approved on
November 13, 1998 on approximately 9 acre
from Neighborhoad BusRness (B-1) ta Regional
Business (3-3).
• Zane reclassification and variance (ZE-40-97IVE-
04-97) were approved on September 24, 1997
an approximately 312 acres frorn Community
- - - - - - Business (13-2) to Regional Bus~ness (B-3) and a
- variance frorn the arterial road frantage
- - requirement
_ Approved zorae reclassificatiorrs just beyond a'l~ m€le
" threshold include{
- * Zone reciassification {ZE-04-98} vw+as approved
an March 7, 2000 on appraxRmatety 2.5 acres
frorn Comrnunity Business (B-2) ta Regianal
Business (B-3)
- - • Zone reclassificatian (ZE-58-97) vyras approved
an February 24, 2000 an approximately 67 acre
from Cornrnunity Busiraess (B-2) to Regianal
Business (8,3)
Land Division S#atus: The subject property is described as a 77-acre si#e
created prior to 1958, verified thraugh the Spakane
County Assessor's feld boaks The applicant wi11 he
required to obtain a Certificate of Exemption
pursuant fo Sectian 12 100 110(5) of th2 Spokane
:Caunty Subdivisian Drdinance prior #o issvance of a
buildNng permi#
Shoreline Desiqnativn: Na# applicable
. ~
ZE-02-41
Staff Repork - April 25, 2001 Public Hearing
.
~
Water Purveyor: The site is in the service area of Vera Water and
Power District No 15 Use of pnvate wells and water
systems is prohibited
Sewage Disposal: The proposal shall be served by an existing public
sewer system Use of an individual on-site sewage
disposal system shall not be authorized
Fire District The subJect site is in Spokane County Fire District
No 1
School District and nearest K-12 The proposal is located within the Central Valley
schools: School Distnct #356. The nearest school is
Greenacres Jr High, located approximately mile
east of the site on Sprague Avenue
Nearest Arterial and Distance: Sprague Avenue lies south of and adjacent to the
project site The Arterial Road Plan identifies that
portion of Sprague Avenue as a Pnncipal Artenal
with a future right-of-way width of 130 feet The
existing right-of-way width of 85 feet is not consistent
with that specified in the Arterial Road Plan. To
implement the Arterial Road Plan, a 10-foot strip of
property along the Sprague Avenue frontage shall be
set-aside as a future acquisition area
Nearest Parks and Distance: The nearest County park facilities are located
approximately 2 miles northwest of the site, north of
I-90 and west of Sullivan Road
Neighborhood Association: Not Applicable
• This proposal is located inside the IUGA
• This proposal is located inside a Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA) Due to the route
and schedule changes, the connecting service cannot be accurately identified
• This proposal is located outside all 1000' notification boundaries of designated Natural
Resource Lands
GIIAA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject site is located inside the Prionty
Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and within the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone.
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas- None Identified on the Spokane County
Critical Area maps.
Floodplain: ~ None identified on the FIRM maps
Geologically Hazardous Areas. None identified on the Spokane County
Critical Area maps.
Wetlands. None identified on the Spokane County
Critical Area Maps or the Wetland Inventory
maps
SEPA
DNS issued April 6, 2001
Comment period ended Apnl 23, 2001
Appeal period ends the same time as the appeal time frame for the proposed land use action
expires
ZE-02-01
Staff Report - Apnl 25, 2001 Pubhc Heanng
Noticinq
Published The Notice of Hearing and DNS were advertised in the Spokesman Review legal section
on April 6, 2001
Mailed. Notice of Application and the Notice of Hearing was mailed to taxpayers/owners of property
located within 400 feet of the boundaries of the subJect site on February 27 and April 6, 2001,
respectively
Site Posted: The deadline for the applicant to post the site was April 9, 2001
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted as Counter Complete- January 29, 2001
Determination of Completeness issued February 22, 2001
Date Notice of Decision is Due: June 22, 2001
ReviewinQ Aqencies
A total of 9 agencies were notified of the proposal and comments were solicited Final comments were due
April 11, 2001
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received Received Received Spokane County Division Yes 2114/01 Spokane County Division Yes 2/8/01
of Engineering and 4110/01 of Engineenng and
Roads, Transportation Roads, Development
Services Spokane County Division Yes 2/20/01 Spokane County Division Yes 2/8/01
of Utilities, Information 4/13/01 of Building and Code
Management Enforcement
Spokane Regional Health Yes 2/22/01 Spokane County Division No
District 4/10/01 of Utilities, Stormwater
Utility
Spokane County Fire Yes 2/21/01 Vera Water & Power No
Protection District No. 1 District No. 15
Spokane County Air Yes 2/7101
Pollution Control Authority
Responses from the Public: No comments were received from the public for this proposal.
Description of the Site: The subject site is located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue
approximately 400 feet west of Flora Road. The site is approximately .7 acre in size (33,387
square feet) and is flat in topography. The site has an existing 560 square foot residence as well
as a 300 square foot detached accessory structure Both existing structures are proposed to be
either demolished or relocated to another site. The dimensions of the site are 112 feet wide by
248.55 feet long, along with a 100 foot by 37-foot wide leg that will provide for ingress/egress via
Sprague Avenue.
BackAround: The current zoning of the subject property is both Community Business (B-2),
(northern portion of property), and Regional Business (B-3), (southern portion of property). The
applicant is requesting a zone reclassification to change the entire parcel to Regional Business
(B-3) for an auto repair facility *
The application for the proposed zone reclassification was submitted on January 29, 2001 and a
technical review meeting was held on February 22, 2001 The application was determined to be
Technically Complete on February 22, 2001 and the Notice of Application was mailed on February
27, 2001. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the proposal on April 6,
2001
ZE-02-01
Staff Report - April 25, 2001 Public Heanng
.
. _ •
Staff Analysis:
Comprehensive Plan:
The subject site is located within the Major Commercial (C) category of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Major Commercial category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of
commercial uses directly related to major throughways. Highway and arterial strip commercial
areas will usually be made up of businesses on individual parcels clustered along a heavily
traveled street or highway, with each use providing off-street parking.
Most commercial development will be on relatively flat land and buildings of low profile. Paved
parking, streets and man-made structures will dominate the site with few natural features.
Landscaping, screening, lighting, signage and other architectural treatment will provide for
aesthetically pleasing development Major Commercial areas require a full line of public services
and utilities. These include services by, or commitment to, sanitary and storm sewers, public
water systems and underground utilities such as phone gas and electricity. The subject property
is located adjacent to Sprague Avenue and will be served by public water and sewer
Objective 6.1.a recommends that commercial developments should be buffered to protect
adjacent areas.
Response: The subject site is surrounded by commercial zoning/uses. The nearest residential
zone/use is approximately 210 feet north of the site. A mini storage facility will be
located between the residential area and the subject site.
Decision Guideline 6 1.1 recommends that the best means of encouraging compatibility between
commercial uses and adjacent land-use categories will be accomplished by considering-
a) orientation of the structures and/or facilities of the proposal to maintain or improve upon
the aesthetics and energy efficiency of all areas affected by the proposal; and
b) provision of buffering needs; and
c) provision of landscaping needs.
Response: The applicant has proposed, in the site plan of record, to orient the automobile repair
facility facing east and provide landscaping on the southern portions of the property,
in excess of the required landscaping adjacent to Sprague Avenue.
Objective 6.1.c requires that developers provide sufficient land for off-street parking at commercial
sites.
Response: The applicant is required to provide 25 off-street parking spaces based on the type
and size of the business. The site plan of record indicates 21 external spaces and 4
internal bays.
Objective 6.1.d encourages adequate circulation patterns in commercial areas and provide -
planned access to public transit.
Decision Guideline 6 1 3 recommends that proposals provide for aesthetic quality of physica)
development and land use along rights-of-way for Arterials, State Highways and Freeways within
the Urban Impact Area (UTA) of Spokane County as follows:
a) The rights-of-way as described above would be intended to have an aesthetically pleasing
view as seen by the traveling public and adjacent property owners when they are
developed with commercial uses b) Standards regarding landscaping, signage, storage and architectural treatment should be
developed for uses locating along these rights-of-way.
Decision Guideline 6 1.5 recommends that before commercial proposals are approved they must
a) conform to plans, policies and regulations of the County water, sewer, storm sewer, utility
and special districts; and
b) identify and take steps to resolve adverse impacts upon the existing water, sewer, storm
sewer, utility, available and future energy resource, and special service district systems.
Response: The subject site shall connect to a public water and sewer system. Adequate
infrastructure exists to serve the proposal
ZE-02-01
Staff Repo►t - Apnl 25, 2001 Public Heanng
Decision Guideline 6.1.6 recommends that befo~e approving proposed commercial developments,
it should be determined that-
a) the proposal has adequate on-site areas for existing and potential parking and storm
drainage control; and
b) the proposal considers the impact upon existing or planned transportation facilities and
conforms to County transportation plans and policies; and
c) the proposal considers access to existing and planned public transit facilities and routes.
Response: The proposal was circulated to Spokane County Engineering & Roads, Development
Services for stormwater review. Engineering did not request a conceptual drainage
plan, but may require access and drainage plans prior to building permit issuance.
Objective 6.1.g encourages the clustering of commercial uses that are oriented toward the urban
or regional market.
The proposed zone reclassification is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and
Decision Guidelines for the Major Commercial (C) category of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning:
The purpose of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone is to provide for the location of a wide
range of retail and service activities and to implement the Major Commercial (C) category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The uses within this zone may often require large areas for customer
parking, retail service, some outside activities, display and other commercial activities It is the
intent of this section to implement Comprehensive Plan policies, which encourage commercial
development along Principal Arterials. General characteristics of these areas include paved
roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, and a full line of public services including manned
fire protection and public transit accessibility
The proposed zone reclassification implements the purpose and intent of the requested Regional
Commercial (B-3) zone based on the availability of public services, adjacent commercial uses
and/or zoning, and direct access to Sprague Avenue, a County Principal Arterial.
The proposed zone reclassification is generally consistent with the purpose and intent of the
proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone
Site Plan:
The proposed site plan illtastrates a 5280 square foot shop, with 4 bays, which includes
approximately 650 square feet of office space for the business. The site plan shows all but the
north 25 feet as paved surface and gravel in the remainder, with the exception of required
drainage areas and landscaping Twenty-five parking spaces are required per the Spokane
County Zoning Code, based on the square footage and proposed use of the structure. The site
plan illustrates 21 exterior parking spaces and it is unclear whether the remaining 4 are proposed
to double as the repair bays A drainage swale is proposed at the west side of the property. A 5-
foot Type III landscaping strip is proposed on the southern portion of the property and along the
Sprague Avenue frontage The site plan of record illustrates general compliance with the
development standards of the proposed Regional Business (B-3) zone.
Proposed Use: Automobile Repair Facility
Total Buildinq Area: 5,280 square feet
Site Pfan Data-
Proposed Required/Allowed
Building Coverage 15.7% 60%
Building Height 23 feet 60 feet
Landscaping - Sprague Ave. 5' Type III 5' Type III
ZE-02-01
Staff Report - April 25, 2001 Public Heanng
. _ ,
Building Setbacks
Front Yard (Sprague Ave.) 230' 35' from Future Acquisition Area (FAA)
Side Yard 20' minimum none
Rear Yard 58' minimum 15'
Parking 25 spaces 25 spaces
Changed Conditions:
Section 14 402.020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that amendments to the zoning
map may occur when it is found that "Changes in economic, technological, or land use conditions
has occurred to warrant modifications." Changed conditions in the area of the proposal include
numerous zone reclassifications approved between 1942 and 1996 and the availability of public
services to the site. The surrounding properties range in use from mini storage to a regional
hardware store.
Staff Summary:
As conditioned by the reviewing agencies, the proposal demonstrates general consistency with
the applicable Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Major Commercial (C) of the
Comprehensive Plan. Detailed review to determine compliance with all Zoning Code regulations
and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur prior to issuance of
building permits.
Attachments
A. Maps
• Vicinity IViap
• Comprehensive Plan
• Site Plan
• Existing Zoning Map
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency and Public Comments
ZE-02-01
Staff Report - Apnl 25, 2001 Public Heanng
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY MAP
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
EXISTING ZONING MAP
ZE-02-01'
vicinity Map
,
j
I ~ ~ ~ Indiana~
Baldwin
AUgU
~ ~~'l11 1~1~ ~ ~SA11d115~.
Mission
AqaxweU
~ ~ +~T'_~~?'~ii~i>>~~ii►~iS~~,ka,t~e'F•t'per ~
~ Ma+cJ.c ll
~ BAyker..,.0ammun i
~smet Iksmet Desmet ~
~
3a
Bmadwav Broadw
Sanneocld
Al}a
Sp ~
d- ~ 5 ~ Alki
mentary nik, 13 .8 N _
~ ~
~ ~ ~
> ~ Olivc
E o `
_ v',i]cy~,.v ~ cn ~ 2 vnvf,ymc~v ~ c"r' c~
v° °
Nhaon olb►n
^ I G J~ I
1~ = V Rivertide
o
Spraeue
> I
~ F o G~ Coxt~ lik 2nd 2nd I
~,~7~ ~ 3rc1
~ t -&celard pvt.
y = ~
e ~ I p p,~. 3rd
g 4th 4,h
~ ~
4th
L
~ s~r~° Greenac~sE/ementary
S`h x vk
'c I
6~►
70 i P.
Jt ~ I I killt~ . ` Vidge Wt
8ih L I
nv, -
u
9th
y ~ v 9th pvt ' ` ~ I
9th 19
Cenira/ 1/.)//ey Senior Nigh~ 2~` C I .
~
~
uLh
~°c f rr
/
12ih
~i ~ .~1 L+ Qth
.
1701 ~0
F-
~ a~
pvL
u ~ 30
2tkh
~ -~Sl o n
22nti /5 ~ 7
22,
Scale 1 inch - 1667 ft (roundcd) 01/30/01 Vcinih' Map
AUTDCRAFT
16911 E, SPRAGUE AVE,
SPOKANE, WA, Q NORTH ~
130,
6 fHAIM,ItK fCkCC IANDSCtiPC ~n~
Kl ~F9.N0
i,~l • , COGCOIASP~yi o /pY[R Ipl( I _
' ' / 7 a a o-
~ t r ~ r,t` I X
~~tl W
ri.
w
~
4 F~' ~f1~ I ~ ~ t
~ ' L}•~- ` ~ ,~KA ~ I«.J~ W x
~i. • ' . 7 PWI~E' L~sc,~E u,u >
o a SNO¢ ~
/ARE ~ •AR A
T
LD 1 V Y I
• I' ^ l....... ...m - ~ ~ Q
~s~v+u~an~ottAP[ Mxn t !
r' t------ z,~yy,---~------ V)
L.woscArc Aitu Q ~
As ato o ~
~
Z
BUILDING IIGD I l Q
PCRCENT pF BUIL0. COVfRAGE- 16/-571a y fa
BUILD USE- WTIMQTIVf RfPAIR
IaHOSCAPf AREa MvROx 1375 S1' m ,y3 .
tYPE (IF LANOSCAPIHfi TmE AI
IA. I
0r PAttKIHG SPNCES REGa1-~.j 26 rxry V~
~EN'SPALE, APPRUX 9000 ~
]Ott ~y„~
TOfK LOi AN[A ]].]Bll ~ ' 1 S ~ ►~'1
SOII • ~ •
lL. V)
Fturw~ L.NC~'b•i(bsrJt{Lr ~ee[ D)(Ir.nt A•h-) Q
n y~ j•~►~' j' r~ ~ L
1 ! ❑ J
~ Iw
:D cy-
r ~ QCL
SITE PIAN ^ 02- O ~
VICINITY MAP OF RECORO
~ r•~v I
PRELIM, SITE PLAN RECEIVED
9POKANE COUNTY ~r
SCALEi 1=20' JAN ? Q 2001 1 °F
~ 1
. ~ r
ZE-02-01
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
` ~ ~T . .
I o ~ _
~ srnet
/
roavay
u I~
~ ~ -
i x ~I I I
hi
I ~ 01rle ~
y - - - ~ I ~ ~
CZ
JE
MinTr
- ~
e d ~
. _ - - I ~
~ - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - i-
-J
~ - - o
> f -Zi) ~
a _
CO CIl ,
U y
~ a
anJ pvl ~ ¢ -
_ Di r1 pvt ~ ~ _ ( I I
~ ~ I - -
~ a sP: u pw ~
c ~
~ n U I HE - -
m ~
~
~11 ~ t 11 ~ 1~~~ ~
~II~~II~~I~~~~~It~11~111111f I111 U
u ~ C
II I
i
~iii~i,i~i~ ~ ~ 4 ~
11~~11 ~1
1
i~°i~~~
iJ11~
i
Z-1
8th ~
s
~a
/l
r
Scale 1 inch m 833 ft (rounded) 01l30/01 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA tid-A -AA-i0' Subject Property within UTA
1 4 1 t 1 4 4 4 Subject Property withm PSSA Subject Property within P`SA
ZE-42-01 ~
Existing Zoning
~ ~ .
I ( UR-3.5 2d6 5~7 u8
/ I '
o UR-3.5 60 42 ~
E ~ . ~ . ~ -
U R . 51 Ll
1[7-79-
~ ~
o 3 ~ I f ~s
o I `
~
I UR-3.5 286 57
I . ~
110~-3.5 60 42 UR 3.5 60 42 , I
13 ' I I
- ~
6- 376 58 , .
`
~-2 40 42 6-2 60 42 B-16042 ~-2 60 4Z ' B-Q . 176 58
B-3 9Z85t, B 3 42 9 B-3 1143 79C
B-3 29 96C I '
0 I
-2 04 B34~ Q~67 >
B 3 4 6-7 68 C I
~ or
-r -
UR.
~ -
~ B- 8 54 B-1 54 I B 3130 7~C
-3 T7C B 3 5A 78C 6-3 37 67 g. ! 60 2 1 5I-2 89 54 B- 376 58
~ I -
~ I-2 8,1154 f,z., 86
~
~ I 5 '
B• 376 58
'
U R-22 109 81 C ..Q UR-Tj~-8-68 ~ -
UR-7 52 8PG I' UR-7 8 69 U-7 6
~ . . ~ ~ ~
24 R-3 60 42i I, ~-U; U- 2-47A lIR- 2 7l
~
U-3. 6 ~ - 4 7 R-1 217f ~ - ~ R 9 7 R- 9 7
UR-3.5 60 42
1
dR-3.5 6[42
'-b
U - -
Uk- 3
Scale 1 inch - 500 ft(rounded) 01/30/01 Existing Zoning
. . •
ATTACHMENT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR ZE-02-01
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOMN,E COtKTY
1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (13-3) zone and Aquifer Sensitive
Area (ASA) Overlay, as amended
2. Any site plan/development proposal shall be reviewed for compliance with the Conditions
of Approval imposed by the Hearing Body All variations must conform to regulations set
forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code.
3. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
lighting and signage plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permit
4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
5. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall
only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Titfe Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action
by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on , imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. ZE-02-01 is availabEe for inspection and copying
in fhe Spokane County Division of Planning.
6. The applicant shall development he subject property in strict conformance with the
concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Variations, when approved by the Planning
DirectorJdesignee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to, building location,
landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original
intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any
building permits. The landscape plan shall be in conformance Chapter 14.806,
Landscaping and Screening Standards, of the Spokane County Zoning Code. A five-foot
Type III landscape strip is required adjacent to Sprague Avenue pursuant to Section
14.806.040(2)(b). Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at
access points is not obscured or impaired
8. The applicant shall obtain a Certilcate oY Exemption pursuant to Section 12.100 110(5) of
the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permst
9. The Spokane County Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The Title Notice shall state the following
a. A strip of property 10 feet in width from the existing right-of-way is reserved for future
acquisition area for additional road right-of-way w+dth along Sprague Avenue
b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities !f any of the
above improvements are within the area, they shall be re{ocated at the applicant's
expense when roadway improvements are made
d The future acquisition area, unit acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses
e The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at
the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future
acquisition.
.
Z1N-15-00
Staff RepoR - January 10, 2001 Public Heanng
• . _ .
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
Walter, Deanna
,
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9 58 AM
To: Walter, Deanna
Cc: Engeihard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda, Baldwin, Greg, Hohman, John,
Little, Colleen
Subject: ZE-2-01 - Dave & Wanda Jefferies
2-08-01
I received the above referenced proposai on February 6, 2001 No concept drainage plan is required and the proposal is
technically complete No critical areas soils are shown on the SCS Soils Survey
I recommend the standards road and drainage condition for current standards
Bill Hemmings, PE
1
f .
To: Deanna Walter (Division of Planning)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2001
Subject: ZE-0002-01 Stage: Technical Review Phase:
B-2 TO B-3
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to estabiish
sewer fees
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal
SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit
SS15A Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
&"v"* cmr"m "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane County Building and Planning Department
FROM. Division of Engineering & Roads -
DATE: February 14, 2001
PROJECT: B-2 TO B-3 AUTOCRAFT
FILE ZE-0002-01
Hearing Date @
Review Date
SponsorlApplicant DAVE JEFFRIES
Section Township Range- 13-25-44
Planner. DEANNA WALTER
Technical/Review Date: (02/22/2001 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer. -
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit fina{ drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable. Final drainage
pfans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
CC. ApplicanC DAVE JEFFRZES
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner pEANNA wALTER
Page 2
Hearing / Review / 02/20/2001 TR
ZE-0002-01
5. The County Engineer has designated a 5-Lane Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development No roadway
improvements are required along the Sprague Avenue frontage of this development County
Road Project No. 2676 constructed Sprague Avenue along the frontage of this proposal
6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicabie county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7. The applicant sha11 construct a paved and deiineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Sprague Avenue
8 Roadway standards, typicaf roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicab{e to
this proposal.
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
10. AI1 required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed
prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a 130 foot Principal Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to
implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width
along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquis+tion. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
13 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
END
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRiCT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
DATE: Apri 1 10, 2001
TO: Deanna Walter, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FRO1V1: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change: ZE-2-01 (Jeffries)
1. References:
a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 20', by Cook's Inc., dated January 22, 2001, received by this office January
29, 2001.
b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, Washington and Idaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e) Spokane County Rules and Regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of water wells in Range 44, 45E, Township 25N, Sections 12, 13, 14, 18, and 24.
g) Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum AquiFer.
b) The project is within Critical VVater Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Vera Water
and Power Co. Water supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside ihe
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recoinmended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in
the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lot is of the
proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system.
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area west of Flora Road and north of Sprague Avenue. Local
drainageways are insignificant.
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison loam with 0% to 5%
slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitatlon of slight. There is also possible contamination of
groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderafie
to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are
from 40' to 160' deep and have static tivater levels varying from 12' to 42' below the surface. The Vera
Water and Power Co. has indicated that it can supply domestie use water for the project
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilrties, Spokane Cowlty.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to
the lot. Use of individual an on-site sewage disposal system shall not be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: DAVE & WANDA JEFFRIES
525 S. CAVALIER CT.
GREENACRES WA 99016
SCOTT VALENTINE
3009 E. 62"" AVE
SPOh.ANE WA. 99223
02/21/01 11ED 15 18 Fa1 509 392 4125 SPOKOIE VALLEI FIRE DEPT PLaNNING oii
SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
• ~ Spokane County Flre OJstrlct l
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 •(509) 926-1700 • FAX (509) 892-4125
February 21, 2001
Deanna Walter
Department of Building & Planning
1026 W. 8roadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE. Zone Reclassification .
ZE-02-01
Dear Ms. Walter:
The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objection to this proposed Zone
Reclassification.
Sincerely,
.
,
~
Kevin Miller
Fire Inspector
KM/m d
,
OADeparfment Data\Prevention Unsherod\PlgtslShortleslWALTER DOC
To: Deanna Walter (Division of Pianning)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Friday, April 13, 2001
Subject: ZE-0002-01 Stage: Hearing Examiner Phase:
B-2 TO B-3
SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed
Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage pnor to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish
sewer fees
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal
SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit
SS15A Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made pnor to issuance of
sewer connection permit Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general
facilities charges Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development
WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
► .
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
~1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO Spokane County Building and Planning Department
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE. April 10, 2001
RPCCP1tE:;?
PROJECT: B-2 TO B-3 AUTOCRAFT SPQKpNE CG` iNTV
FILE ZE-0002-01
APR
Hearing Date 04-25-2001 @ 3 30 pm
Sponsor/Applicant DAVE JEFFRIES DIVI5ION t~~ ~~~NNCNc,
Section Township Range 13-25-44
Planner- DEANNA WALTER
Technical/Review Date (02/22/2001 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit.
4_ A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitied and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
5. The County Engineer has designated a 5-Lane Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development_ No roadway
improvements are required along the Sprague Avenue frontage of this development Couniy
Road Project No 2676 constructed Sprague Avenue along the frontage of this proposal
cc Appl zcant nr,v~ ~EFr KrEs
Enc3i ne^r/Sur~cyor
Plaaitiet DFJ4idNA b;AiTi P
"JoC' 2 ' • •
Hearing / Revlew / 02/20l2001 i'r:
ZE-000?-O]
6 All required improvements shail conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
7 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Sprague Avenue
8 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are appiicable to
this proposal
9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
10 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed
prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be fifed with the County
Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a 130 foot Principal Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the plan In order to
implement the Artenal Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width
along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue
12. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities ""The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work "
13 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards
END
.
Walter, Deanna
From: Forry, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 6 59 AM
To: Waiter, Deanna
Subject: Landuse Action - ZE-2-01 Rezone to B-3
The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in ordel• to bc
informed of code requirements adi»uiistered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act
Design/developinent concei-ns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydraiit floxv, approved water systeiYis,
building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classi tication, existiiig exterior wall protection and energy code
requirements.
jeff Fomj
Senior Briilding Technrciarx
Spoknrte Coiciihj nubiic Works
Diviston of Bicilding & Codc Enforcenlerlt
(509)477-7103
i
FEB-07-01 02.15PM FROM-SCAPCM 5094776828 7-365 P 01/04 F-008
.
■
SPOKANE COUNTY
C~CLEA~i•*~PAM AIA POIlUTION
~#=I o K A... E CONTROI AUTHORRY
WEST 1101 COcLEGE, SUI7E 403 • SPOKANE, WA 99201 •(509) 4774727 fax (509) 477-6828
Date February 7, 2001
To pEanna Walter. Associate Pianner •
Spokane Countv Division of Planninq
1026 W. Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
From: Ron Edgar, Cn,ef of Technical Services
RE: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR. -
File No ZE-02-01
Proponent / Project Name Zone reclassification from B-2 to B-3 on .71 acres 16911 E. SQraque Ave.
C+ Request for Comments on Februarv 22, 2001 (M 1:15 p.m.
The following is a Iist of concerns/issues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined from
informaUon received by this office. The iist is provided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not
relieve tne proponent frorn meeting all local, state, and/or federal regulations For additionaf informaiion or
clanfication, contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727. Copies of SCAPCA regulations are avaiiabie for purchase in
our office or can be viewed and downioaded from http.~Avww.scaoca.orq
Construction related requirements
• Dust emissions during demolibon, construction and exqvation projects must be controfled ?'his may require
the use of water sprays tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activiry durirlg certain weather conditions
• Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces
1f track;ng or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediatefy to clean ehese surfaces.
• Debris generated as a resulc of this project musc be disposed of by means other than burning
• SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traWeled surfaces (i e ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads,
etc ) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emtssions
• if objectionable odors rasult from this project, effective control apparatus and measures must be taken to
reduce odors to a minimum.
Additionat requirements
• A Notice of Construction and ApplicaUon for Approval is required to be submitted and approved 'ay SCAPCA
pnor to the construction, installation, or establishment of an air poilution source This inciudes emergency
generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) or higher, natural gas heating eqUipment un,ts rated at 4 MM6TU/hr or
higher (input), and heating equipment units fired with other fuels (e.g. diesel) rated at 1 MM6TU/hr (mput) or
htgher Contact SCAPCa for a Notice of Construction applicaUOn
. A Notice of Intent mvst be submitted to SCAPCA pnor to any demolit+on project or asbestos project An
asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA accredited building inspector prior to the demolition or
renovation of buildings to determine if asbestos-containing matenaf is present at the site Contact SCAPCA
for a Notice of Intent application.
U0%Msty'stSCP-k\GENEf:AL CGMMENI'S FORM dec
• ~ D~~nro0 on Re:,cr~ ~aper
a
. .
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~t►
s'"'`q CA""'Uy "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane County Building and Planning Department
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: April 10, 2001 ~
PROJECT: B-2 TO B-3 AUTOCRAFT
FILE ZE-0002-01
,
Hearing Date: 04-25-2001 @ 3:30 pm
SponsorlApplicant: DAVE JEFFRIES
Section Township Range: 13-25-44
Planner: DEANNA WALTER
Technical/Review Date: (02/22/2001 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans. -
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable. Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The County Engineer has designated a 5-Lane Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. No roadway
improvements are required along the Sprague Avenue frontage of this development. County
Road Project No. 2676 constructed Sprague Avenue along the frontage of this proposal.
CC. Applicant DAVE JEFFRIES
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner DEANNA WALTER
Page 2
Hearing / Review / 02/20/2001 TR ZE-0002-01
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Sprague Avenue.
8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal. -
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
10 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed
prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a 130 foot Principal Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to
implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width
along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
12. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition.
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work."
13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
END
f
DETERMINATTON OF
NONSIGNIFICANCF - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section l 1.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVTRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: ZE-2-01
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone reclassification from Community Business (B-2) and Regional
Business (B-3) to Regional Business (B-3) on approximately .7 acres for an auto repair facility and for
those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
PARCEL NO.: 45134.1768
HEARING DATE AND TIME: April 25, 2001 at 3.30 p.m.
APPLICANT: Dave & Wanda Jcffries, 525 S Caval ier Ct., Greenacres, WA 99016, 509/926-7002
ADDRESS A►ND LOCATION OF PROI'OSAL: 16911 East Sprague Avenue, generally located north
of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue approximatcly 400 feet west of Flora Road in the Southeast'/a of the
Southeast'/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY IaTVISTON OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environmenl. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and uther information on file with the lead agency This information is available
to the public on request
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later
than 5:00 p.m., April 23, 2001, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent
to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By. Deanna Walter, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99 60-0220 009) 477-7 00
DATE ISSUED. April 6, 2001 SIGNATUR.E:
CONeV1II,41S REGARDING INVIRONMFNTAL CONCERNS ARE WEL.COME AT THE HEARiNG.
APPEAL OF THIS DETElZM1NATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE
COUNTY DNISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factua) objections
Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to
1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. ~,~(d.9~►an,~ ~ •u~~v~~iroi~~fi~m~ •i n~ •i~ ~ ~ ~ ~a i iw l~r~ I h~ i
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Sec-vices; B1II HeIt1I111I1gS
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer
9. WA State Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell
10. Fire Protection District No. 1
11. Central Vallcy School District No 356
12. Vera Water & Power
/
• A
j {
S P O K A N E , s~~, _ C O U N T Y
_
DIVISI0N OF PLANNINC A DNISION O}' THG 1'UBl_1C WORKS DEPARTMEM'
MICHAEL V NEEDMAM, DIRGCTOR GARY O13F-RG, DIfZECTOR
MEMORANllUM
TO: #DplOkangeCounty il ll~l 3~Q1'i ~l~it~ ~11~~'
Division of EngincEring & Roads; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Butlding & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
Fire District No. 1
Vera WaYer and Power
FROM. Deanna Walter, Associate Planner
.
DATE: March 29, 2001
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of April 25, 2001 at 3 30 p.in (please note different
time)
FiLr nTo: zE-2-01
BRIEF DESCRYPTION: Rezone from B-2 and B-3 to B-3 on approximately.7 acres
for an auto repair facility and for those uses allowed in the B-3 ione
PARCEL NO.: 45134.1768
APPLYCANT• Dave & Wanda Jeffries
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency
Please review and return any comments to me by Apri) 11, 2001
Attachment: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 1N f3ROADWAI' • S('OKANC, WA5HINCTON 99260-0220
I'HONI. (509) -i77-720t1 • FAX (504) 977-2243 • '1'UD (509) 477-71 13
~
~ ~~~~~E O~ ~~~~~C I-IFARING
sPOKANE CoUNTY H~~~~~~ ~~AMrNER
TO: All interested per-sons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
1'OC.1 A1; HEREBY NDTIFIEll TEIAT A F[JBLIC HEARING WYLL Br HELD [IN THE
I1ANxl USE APPLICATXON I1rSTED 8ELOW, AS H'DLLOWS:
Applicatxan: ZE-2-0 1; Zone reclassif cation troni Conimunity Business (B-?) and hearioI~~l Business
(B-3) to Regional Busij-iess (B-3) on approximately .7 acres for an auta rep~ir facility and for thase uses
a1lowed in the Regiona! Bus~ness (B-3) zone.
Parcel No(s): 451 34.1768
Hearing Date an€~ 'firne: A pril 2 5, 2001 at 3.30 p rn.
Placc; Corrsrnissioners Assembly Raoni, Lower Level, Spokane County Pub11c Works Building, 1026
West Bxoadway, Spakane, Washington
Owner: Dave & Wanda Jeffries, 525 S. Cavalier Ct.y Greenacrcs, WA 99016, 5091926-7002
AIIDRESS AN.i] LOCATION OF FROPC]SAi.. 16911 Eas~ ~prague Avenue; generally ivcated north
of and adjaceizt to Sprague Avenue approxitnaiely 400 feet v+aest of Fiora Road in the 5outheast 'l~ otthe
Southeast l~ of Section 1331 Townsl3ip 25 N., Range 44 F-WM, Spokane County, WA
Comprehensive Plan; Majar Corilmercial (C)
Existing Zoaing: COIT7n11121I1~ BuS1neSS (B-2) al"ld Reg1oI1a1 BLlslnes5 (B-j)
Enviroamenial Determinafiion: A Deterxninatiorl of Nonsig,nificance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Plarning, as the lead agency ~i-t ApriI 63, 2001. 7'he commeilt periad ends April 23, 200X.
Related Pcrm Mts:
Drvision of PIanning Staff: Deaiina Walter, AssociaCe Plan,ner, (509) 477-7200
~~A-PdNG EXAMINER PR()CEDUREi S
Hearing Prncess and Appcalst 'Fhe hearing will be conducted under the rules of praceduxe adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. A11 inierested persoiis may testify at the pvblic hearing, and
rrnay submit written comrnents and dvcuments befare or at the hearing The Hearir~g F-xaminer may limit
the tirne given to speakers. Asp~aker representing each side of the issue is encauraged. Any appeal of
the Hearsng Examiner's decision will be based oii the recard established before the Hearing Exarniner,
pursuanl to Caunty Resolutian Nas 96-0171. Environmental appeals vv111 follow the sarrie prQCedural
route as the underl}ring action. Al] lieariiigs will be conducted an facrlities thal are accessibie to persons
witli physical disabilitics
Inspectionnf File, CoPies of Docurnents: A Staf!` IZepQa-t wi11 generally be availabac for inspection
seven days before the fiearii~g The Staff RepDrt aTld appliCalliDrl ilC 111aV be iiispeCled dl th~ Sp0kai7e
Couniy D€visio,i ofPlanning, 1" Flooi- Perinit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W ~'3road'way,
SpokaRie, WA 99?60=0220, betvveen 8-30 a tn ai7d 5,00 p m., we.ekdays, M-F, cxcept holidays. Coptes
of daeuirients wiEl be made avaliable for the cost afrepr-aduction. If yQu have Eiiiy questions ❑r special
needs, please call the Divislati al (509) 477-7200. Send wntlen comments to thc Spokane Caunfy
Division of Planning, 1026 W Broacivvay, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn. Deaniia Walter, File No. ZE-2-0l.
Motions must be made in wrifing anci submitted to tlae Spokane Cour►ty fiearing E~xaminer5 3'd Tioor,
Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadvvay, Spokaiie, WA. 99260-0245.
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
s~0&AN'CX)U1\-1-1 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane County Building and Planning Department
" ~ ~
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: February 14, 2001 PROJECT: B-2 TO B-3 AUTOCRAFT
FILE ZE-0002-01
Hearing Date: @
Review Date
SponsorJApplicant: DAVE JEFFRIES
Section Township Range: 13-25-44
Planner: DEANNA WALTER
Technical/Review Date: (02/22/2001 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable. Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
CC. Applicant DAVE JEFFRIES
Engineer/Suxveyor
P].anner DEANNA 4;ALTER
Page 2
Hearing / Revieca / 02/20/2001 TR ZE-0002-01
5. The County Engineer has designated a 5-Lane Principal Arterial Roadway Section for the
improvement of Sprague Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. No roadway
improvements are required along the Sprague Avenue frontage of this development. County
Road Project No. 2676 constructed Sprague Avenue along the frontage of this proposal.
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Sprague Avenue.
8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed
prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Sprague Avenue as a 130 foot Principal Arterial. The
existing right of way width of 85 feet is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to
implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 10 feet in width
along the Sprague Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Sprague Avenue.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
END
Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9 58 AM
To: Walter, Deanna
Cc: Engelhard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda, Baldwin, Greg, Hohman, John,
Little, Colleen
Subject: ZE-2-01 - Dave & Wanda Jefferies
2-08-01
I received the above referenced proposal on February 6, 2001 No concept drainage plan is required and the proposal is
technically complete. No critical areas soils are shown on the SCS Soils Survey
I recommend the standards road and drainage condition for current standards
Bill Hemmings, PE
i
PAGE 1 , , 14:09:11 06 FEB 2001
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
04538 SPRAGUE AV (START) .000 HAVANA ST & SPOKANE U 14 PAVED 60
SPRAGUE AV .120 DEARBORN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 60
.250 CUSTER RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 60
.370 CHRONI CLE RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 60
.500 CARNAHAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 60
.710 MCKINNON ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
.840 HOWE ST (END) U 14 PAVED 60
1.000 FANCHER RD U 14 PAVED 68
1.290 DYER RD (END) U 14 PAVED 68
1.310 DYER RD (START) U 14 PAVED 68
1.380 APPLEWAY BV (START) U 14 PAVED 82
1.510 THIERMAN ST U 14 PAVED 82
1.560 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
1.620 BRADLEY RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
1.690 DORA ST (END) U 14 PAVED 82
1.750 COLEMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
1.880 GIR.ARD RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
2.000 PARK RD U 14 PAVED 82
2.450 VISTA RD (START) & L U 14 PAVED 82
2.560 SIPPLE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
2.590 BESSIE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 82
2.710 SARGENT RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
2.860 DISHMAN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 82
2.900 BR 4594 UNDERPASS FO U 14 PAVED 82
2.990 ARGONNE RD U 14 PAVED 88
3.060 DISHMAN-MICA RD (END U 14 PAVED 88
3.120 WILLOW RD U 14 PAVED 88
3. 24 0 LOCUST R.D (START) U 14 PAIIED 88
3.370 FARR RD U 14 PAVED 88
3.460 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 14 PAVED 88
3.550 WALNUT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
3.620 HERALD RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
3.650 DARTMOUTH RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
3.760 FELTS RD (U-CITY) U 14 PAVED 88
3.800 BALFOUR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
3.870 RAYMOND RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
3.990 UNIVERSITY RD U 14 PAVED 88
4.180 GILLIS RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
4.280 MOFFITT RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
4.370 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
4.510 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 88
4.680 FOX RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
4.750 UNION RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
4.810 PERRINE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
4.870 ROBIE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
5.000 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 14 PAVED 88
5.110 HOUK RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
5.130 HOUK RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
5.520 MCDONALD RD U 14 PAVED 88
5.580 CLINTON RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
5.660 MCCABE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
5.760 BLAKE RD U 14 PAVED 88
5.850 MAYHEW RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
6.010 EVERGREEN RD U 14 PAVED 88
6.110 BOLIVAR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
6.180 BANNEN RD (START) U 14 PAVED 88
6. 3 00 BEST RD (END) U 14 PAVED 88
6.510 ADAMS.RD , U 14 PAVED 88
6.760 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 88
PAGE 14:09:_1 06 FEB 2001
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
7.030 SULLIVAN RD U 14 PAVED 86
7.530 CONKLIN RD U 14 PAVED 71,5`
7.910 STEEN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 71
8.040 FLORA RD U 14 PAVED 71
o. 240 TSCHIRLEY RL (START) U 14 PAVED 71
8.280 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) U 14 PAVED 71 I
8.340 APPLEWAY AV (START) U 16 PAVED 20
8.360 S PR.AGUE AV ( END ) U 16 PAVED 20
8.450 MAN I FOLD RD (END ) U 16 PAVED 20
8.540 LONG RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
8.630 ARTIES CT (START) U 16 PAIIED 20
8.690 MOEN ST (END) U 16 PAVED 20
8.780 GREENACRES RD U 16 PAVED 20
9.040 BARKER RD U 16 PAVED 20
9.190 HARMONY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
9.400 HOLIDAY RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
9.540 HODGES RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
SPR.AGUE AV (END) 10.050 HENRY RD U 17 PAVED 20
04540 SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY .000 LIBERTY LAKE RD R 08 LIGHT BITTJM. 20
SPRAGUE P.V .050 BR 5507 LIBERTY LAKE R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.080 MCKINZIE DR(LIBERTY R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.140 GARRY DR(START)(LIBE R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.310 WRIGHT BV (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BI'TUM. 20
.420 MOLTER RD R OS LIGHT BITUM. 20
.480 WARD RD (END) R OS LIGHT BITUM. 20
.630 CLUBHOUSE RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.800 HILLVIEW RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.990 OVERLOOK RD (END) R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPRAGUE AV (END) 1.110 GAGE ST (END) & NEYL R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 20
04621 S PR.AGUE AV (START ) .000 IDAHO RD R 09 GR.AVEL 18
SPRAGUE AV (END) .150 IDAH4 STATE LINE R 09 GR.AVEL 18
04845 SPRAGUE AV (START) .000 TSCHIRLEY RD U 19 PAVED 30
SPRAGUE AV (END) .090 SPR.AGUE AV U 19 PAVED 30
04537 SPRAGUE RD (START) .000 WEST END AT LINCOLN R 09 GRAUED/DR.AINED 10
SPRAGUE RD 1.010 STROUP RD R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 10
2.000 COULEE HITE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 24
3.040 LADD RD ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 18
3.660 BNSF CROSSING 450151 R 09 GR.AVEL 18
4.040 WOOD RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
4.930 US ARMY PURSUANT SEC R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
SPRAGUE RD (END) 5.040 RITCHEY RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
02302 SPRAGUE ST (START) .000 SOUTH END TO 6TH AV R 09 GR.AVEL 12
SFRAGUE ST (END) .090 6TH AV R 09 GRAVEL 11.2
6 Records Processed
i r
~ S P C7 N -F-~ o' C~ C~ T-i IV" T ~
DN15ION OF PL.AIVNING A DMr1510h! OF THE PUSLIC WOw DEf'AR'Y'MHNT
111f1CHAEL V NEEDHAM, QIRECTOR MEMORANDUM GARY OBERG, DIRECTOK
DATE: February 5, 2001
TO. R0cP1.tl5~-"'Ti'aIlgpO.Ctatlibn-EI7gli~ec1'1t7g, Scbtt ~
YvA~1~.~rd;~~:~Id-S, affd7K M17NIL
:)~ivision of Engineering and Roads- Developmejit Services; Pxll Heinrnings
Division of LTtilities - Z-nformation tVlanagement, Jim Red
Division of LTtilities - Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spakane Regional Healtll Distric.t, Steve Holderby
Spakane County Division of Building & CodQ k.nforcement, Jeff Farry
Spokane Caunty Air Pollution Control Authorifiy, Chuck S#uder
Spokane Regional Transportation Council, GIenn Miles
Central Va11ey SchaoI District No. 3 56
Spokane County Fire Protection Diskrict No. I
Vera Water an.d Povver
W1l State Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell
WA State Department of Ecology; Chris Merker
FRO1Vl: Deanna Walter, Assaciate Plazaxier ~
SUBJECT: ZE-2-01; Zone Reclassificatian from Cornmunity Business (B-2) ta
Reglonal Business (B-3) on 71 acres of la.nd for those uses allowed in the
pzaposed B-3 zone
"TECHNICAL REVIEEVV MEETING
FEBRUf-1RY 22y 2001 ab 1: 15 -Pr.l.r
Division Of Planning lst Floor {Cnnference Roorn IA
Please review ihe above application and use the attached TECHNICAL R-EVIEv~ ~ETING
FOR-vt for your comments. The Division vf Planning encourages you to attend this
rneeting. The spansor and representative have a1so heen invified to attend this meeting. If
you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the
attached form to me for th~ iiieeting The attached TECHN7CAL R-EVILW FORMS vvill be
given ta the sponsor at ttie meeting and incluticd in the Division af P1arlning f~le Thanks
fCDX y4lil" CDOpe1"atIQII. Zf yOU I1aVe aily ql1eSt1oI7S 3bo11~ the appl1Cat]011, please cantact me
3t ~~~~~~~0
NOTE: The Division of Flanning will naw be circulating comments far SEPA ChecFclist at
the time +af teeltnica[ review. This will be the onfy time you vvill be able to
comment regarding the SEPA Criecklist for this projcct.
wc
AttachmentS: Techrrical Review Forrn, Project Application, Site Plc71"l, ViCICZIty IVIBp, SEPA Checklist
Copy wythout enclosures Dave & Wantia Jeffries, Owner, 525 S Cavalier Ct., Greenacres, WA 99016
Scatt Valentine, Surveyor, 3009 E 62"d Avenue, Spakane, WA 99223
1026 W IiRC]ADYV.AY • SPOKANE, WA5MINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE (549) 477-7200 i FAC. (509) 471-2243 • TDD (509) 477-7133
r .
Spokane County
Division of Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: February 22, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m.
Project File No.: ZE-2-01
Project Location: The project is located at 16911 E. Sprague Avenue in the
southeast '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Commercial
Project Description: Zone Reclassification from Community Business (B-2) to
Regional Business (B-3) on .71 acres of land for those uses allowed in the
proposed B-3 zone.
Parcel No(s): 45134.1768
Owner: Dave & Wanda Jeffries
525 S. Cavalier Court
Greenacres, WA 99016
(509) 924-8738
Project Planner: Deanna Walter
.
. , Z 0 2=6- 0 1,
SPOKANE COUNTY ~
~ DIVISION OF PLANNING - RECEIVED
"
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION SPOKANE COUNT1f
JAN 2 q 2001
PART I
G~ E-NE 'Lill NFORM
..Applicant 4~l~ f , a-/1 '~Vai1~
Maiimg Address 525 5, C~~~~~r crk-
City 6reenaeres tate aR" Zip Code! 0~ 6
Phone'~700 Z- (Work)(S-4G! I 2,4 - 873qHome) Fax (15010 qZ :6-04( f
~ -
Lega1 Owner .SGL/wP
Mailing Address
City . State Zip Code
Phone (Work) - (Home) Fax
Agent, if different from applicant
r
Mailing Address
City State ~ Zip Code
Phone (Work) (Home) Fax
Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft) TH
Adjacent area owned or controlied (acres or sq.
Assessors parcel #(s) of projecUproposal LZ4-1 314 j7& 8
Assessor's parcei #(s)of adjacent area owned or controlled '
Street address of proposal 2e~ S~o T'- ~C~t° "4ve.*
) and date established yalnd 3-3
Existing zone classificati7001E.
Existing use of property ~
Proposed zoning-IrDm B-,2 -/T 9-3 or) O /o ~
Comprehensive plan category (0/'k.mercc~ School district Alle 4v ~ 3,56- •
1
Water purveyor W G1.t'e4' Fire district _E/5/. /
Proposed use of property•
Single famify dwelfings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes Business Industrial Mixed use
Other ( ) - Describe
r i us lannin division actions involvin this roPe
List p ev o p g 9 p rtY .
1 `
l 1
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PAGE 2 of 5
L-C~ U U '~EG S~IFIC~TI~ IO'+MA 101~
Address and Location of proposal
~
~
Section 13 Township CPN~ Range
Name of public/private road(s) providing access ~/'Z~ (,Le Ale,
~ GV
Width of property fronting on public/private road 37ool
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes v No
Name(s) of arterial roads Sp ra-~ GCr, 4 I/e- _
Legal description of property for each zone reclassifiGation proposed
TA-e C-QS f ~12- FeG t o 7C -A e, Wes f .2 /A jCee o4- d IC Tie.&-c.f /6, (AC-4 A,
~c o 1-'d p la.,-j- ~tesr-j .e d : ,-t Uo 1C.4 it y 0"a -f
74a
S 5~4--tz~C 20 &--J Z
e- 4,c.4-r-r S
Existing zone(s) &nd 13--3 to proposed zone(s) "
for the following described property:
(Atta h legal desa
tion stamped by land surveyor or provide below ) ~Y~ /11
1 Gt '
~if' 3 "7
If you do not hold title to the property, what is your interest in it?
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
The -f;-on4 D-P 4&L;s nrope,r zon ecQ 8 3Qn4-~o use j n - `l~i e ~?G~ r i'1eedS A SQ,sa~. , WSo
t)l,aS'" ~b p1.~< 0 n Spr'Qc e Pa,eA- iS ou~ g
ds ~o►~~
; 7J
~
~ ~J✓ ~~~~Q
5c.
zlI
~
l
3OCY2
~
,
. .
ZONE RECtASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PAGE 3 of 5
What factors support the zone reclassification?
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
Compliance with purpose and intent of zoning ~-2,on 1+'L~ 40~- 3 I,S
,
0-0-y'l-D-15 +Czk-E-- l,t..r rTru-v~. e4a- _
Description of changed conditions of the area that you feel make is proposal warranted
l,~ ~ u4-rUu.V*-dt-c n ~ OGirCe- le (.S W 1 ~ an-4, ~ Qrc a-3 ,
~
What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties?
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
ByIL° , ZB~'l C lCe l G~-~S'S 1~Cc~~ ax w444es
L°iCt S~~
PA RT 11
~ FIRE MARSHALL / FIRE DISTRICT
RCW 36 70 B requires eariy coordination and information
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO ~
B. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE MADE TO MEET THE DISTRICTS FIRE PROTECTION
REQUIREMENTS? 11 2 r i~y .,~v-~•h~ v~~~o ~
` • v -~-;~~..E r
C. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
D. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW (gallons per minute): uk
1 have neviewed the roposal and have advised the applicant of the Fire District requirements.
~'(Ae lq-Wj
~ SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
_
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PAGE 4 of 5
WATER PURVEYOR VWCU ~I`Jr
VN~
~
RCW 36 70 B requires early coordination dnd information
A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN WATER DISTRICT
B. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW HAVE BEEN
MADE AS FOLLOWS
A WATER SYSTEM PLAN MUST BE PREPARED' YES ~ NO
REQUIREMENTS. n(-' , S v,~. ~ l~-r~(' a►~~uc~~ ,
C SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED
~
1 h revlewed the proposal and have advised the applicant of the Distnct requirements.
~ L, 1-2 N~-1
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
^ SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT RCW 36.70 B requires early coordination and information
A PRELIMINARY ISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLICATION MUST
~ A-t~
I NC LU DE: G~~ Pr ~ ~.'4 -Pa 4zr~ '
~r4.ne'~
B. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
Afier a preliminary review of the proposal, ! have advised the applicant of some of the
Spokane Regional Health requirements. A complete and detailed review will be provided after the
applicafion is subm' ed, which will resu/t in a complete list of requiremenfs and conditions regarding
Health provision or the proposal.
T~ ~ ZG d /
SIGNATURE TITLE DA E
SEWER PURVEYOR
(City of Spokane or Liberty Lake)
RCW 36.70 B requires early coordination and information
A P SION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLICATION MUST
INCLUDE:
~
B SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
After a preliminary review of the proposal, I have advised the applicant of some e
A Sewer requirements. A complete and detailed review will be provided after the applica is
submitfed, which will result in a complete list of nequirements and condifions regarding Sewer provis
for the proposal.
SIGNATURE TtTLE DATE
!
ZONE RECIASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 5 of 5
dol~
o
.
00. ~ 0 ; 0~ WASy0.oo
• ~ .,t~fi ~'C o
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
~
I, the under igned, a licen~ d land surveyor, have completed the information q° °
map and w tten legal desc~ipti ~°esZ J oo°
~ 00
~ OO~~~g OoOB O
Signed
~ Date EXPIRES 1/21/ ~f
Address -3009~ e„ Q* . Phone
City S Po kj~r•J ir State IrtJ Zip
PART III
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penaity of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully
and to the best of my knowledge.
i further swear or affirm that I am the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously identified
land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewith is written permission from the owner authorizing
my actions on his/her behalf.
~ kJaA4LJe Signed ~~VG `1 IeS (~~~it, Date 1"2117-01
~ /Address C}~✓li/ied' G~- Phone Ct Z~ "70O 7
City 1~een a, 0 i ~s State Zip
r enta 'v
Aate
State of Washington )
) ss:
County of Spokane )
Signed and swom or affirmed before me on this day of 4 A-7IJt,( AO-4~ , 2004,
by I)PAi i n N10 r> UP(A)O E-8
►
Notaq~~ al
, ~ v ~
Notary Public in and for the-,S6te of Washingto residing
at
► ~ r. 1 % z oo -
My appointment expires -~6~--
f L~~•~. I a i- ~ .
N,
~
PART IV
,
TO BE COMP~D BY THE DIVISION OF PIANNING
Date submitted J -7..0LIQ i File number
Date accepted By
Total fees Receipt number
~
AUTOCRAFT
16911 E, SPRAGUE AVE, ~
SPOKANE, WA, ~ NORTH
~
6' GNIw.fN( fDC[
~0 POYER P0.E IAMDStAPt IJtCA - - -
ECGCWASPIALI
w ~r A i ~'ti:
W
IJi~A ~p
----oPORPOL[------s~~-y ~ z ~ ►
/
~
~,h ' sHo ~ .~F~IC 1:I > a
1 , • ARE ~ -AR A
~ ~
~ Lo
M~'~;. Q
• I , ' . ' ~ A! RfdR OSCiVC ARG tj
InNDLCAPt N7A ~
AS RCO 0
.t...
B„LoING IWO Q
v[Rarrt ov BuiLo covEaaGE- 16z-5Jro sV;4 J
tUll0. USG AiITpOTIVE REPAIR
LANDSCAPE AREM MPRO%. 1373 Sf 1,0 ~
T1'P[ [IF LAND9CAPING, TTPE =
N0. OF oNtKING SPACES REO, T-&+j 26 f~ ~ba" ~ W
rcxaar a ovcn svact- APaROx. gooo
aott s.+e.,-k 1 ' ' -
TIITIiL lAT NMA 73.317,
~ ~ i~_• o ~ 1"~
~ LL_ V/
Lrlil'.14 l.NG)'D-2(p~tK{tirr..~o~l !•~Un~r Arhny <
a.,,... z..,~ a.,
L
U H
❑ J
F- W
~ :D M
Q~
. ' ~'~l~~f~Y ' • ~ ~ SITE PIAN ZE-02-01
VICINITY MAP OF RECORO
j•.rw
PRELIM, SITE PLAN RECEIVED RL'
SPOKANE COUNTY ~
SCALEo 1'=20' 1 a~
JAN?Q2001 1
a
s
~
RECEIVED
SPOKAME COUNgZy'
JAN ? P 2007
DIvISso~ PLANNIWO
:E'NV-- : -C H--
E C= S
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230-1-
~
SEPA ErvROmmENTAL CHEcKLIST
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1)
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you
and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,
if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
IIVSTRUCTIOiVS FOR APPLICAIVTS
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire esperts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions
now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmenLal agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all paru of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period
of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submic this checklist may ask you to
eYplain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determininj if there may
be significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROIECT PROPOSr1LS:
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
applv " IN ADDITI0N, complete the SUPPLENIEiNTAL SHEET FOR vON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"propeny or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively.
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 2 of 21
v
A. BACKGROUND FII.E/PROJECT No.
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
i2 r ~ 45 34 '76~ -B
n ~ ce ati
~
6 D bul"d c~~ re-p a.,r r -faCi I-tL-
2. Name of applicant:
P,
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
~ v? 6 !5. O"M I e,-f- C,+ .
~ ~e " r~ ► ~ A- ~(cl D l.~
G~ ~
-
19- Oci q ?.k, -7 0 4,2 A 6-44~.
509 Gi?~
.
4. Date checklist prepared:
5. Agency requesting checklist:
~ .
~Qo Z.~~ 1l Cl-n n
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
rl. O
~ Q .
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 3) of 21
A. BACKGROLJND (conunued):
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, eYpansion, or further activity related Lo or connected with this
proposal) If yes, eYplain.
Uie, +4 bta ~ (d ao Ci~ - re- r
~
`J
b. Do you ozvn or have opcions on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal) If yes, explain
8. List any environmental informacion you know a'oout zhat has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
!'lo n -e__
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
10~~
Spokane Environment3l Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21
, , A. BACKGROUND (concinued):
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
sice. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.
You do not need Lo repeat those answers on this page.
a,-/e -5 4 n/6r
L ~
-3 3
~
/l -j
G
v '
12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, includincy a street address, if any, and seczlon, township and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide che range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicace maps or detailed plans submirted with any permit
application related to this checklist.
3qZL6
b q E.
~
n
Sep-,-k a
13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The
Priority Sewer Service Area) The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Counry's ASA Ove:lav zone Aclas for
boundaries).
~~•y-1 PSSA, OuAtd'e-,
~ ~ ~,e -I-~n~. 4►~
.
~
Evaluation For
, Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. EWIRONMENTAL ELEMEivTS.
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one . flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other: b. What is che steepest slope on the site (appro:cimate percent slope))
~b--v\ -e-
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland. C'
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe. fA O
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any fillina or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
~ ~-~v •~t" v ~.u~
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construccion, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checkllst Page 6 of 21
.
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for e:cample, asphalt or buildings)? ~ C=
h. Proposed measures to reduce o control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
6ra~sj ~ ~ a,es c~~,~ re
~J
T1.1-If 2. AIR
a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industnal, wood smoke) during construction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known.
rI
&I
~
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe. r)
~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
n/
Spokane Environmental Ordar.ance Checklist Pa~e 7 of 21
1 1
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEiNTS (Continued):
3. WATER
a Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, 13kes) ponds, wetlands)) If yes, describe
rype and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
r
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans
NOS n,o
J
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
b,?P,
~
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general
description, purpose, and appro.-cimate quantities if known.
lb °er'- '104- `~y A p
~
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on tbe site
plan. KA ~ Spokane Environmenta? Ordinance Checklist Pa~e 8 of 21
1 ' •
Evaluat►on For
Agency Use Only
B. EiNNIRONVIEiNT'AL ELEMEiNTS (Continued).
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
b. Ground:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approYUnate quantities if known.
Io 4 ro a -C- S-Catfx"-e
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of persons the syst m(s) are expected to serve.
~Died -40 --4~ 5 cp~ ff . 1l.
4q r
~ -6 L ielS n, c -4c.Q.-~
3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste,
installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including
systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains).
Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be dzsposed of through the
system and the rypes of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which
may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting
activities).
~ P ~.c~ ~ l~ ~J ~(oo r ~a..c.. n t.v ~ e~ 2r--~ r~
Spokane Environmencal Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21
~
, Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. EiNVIRONtMENTAL ELEMEI~TTS (Continued):
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum tuels) be stored in above-
ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will
be stored?Oa's
4 i/l.c,C d ~C n'c.o
ak-w-
G ~
5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals
stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes
measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
~
c. Water Runoff (including storm water)
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this wate: flow? Will this
water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
-P- oYA r o a t c,t)
Lj .
~
2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or
leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system
discharging to surface or groundwater?
3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters) If so, generall,y describe
-Oi- Llr1
uetz& 111PLa44z1,'j' wiw A6~'
~ uLC~;~►~ _
Spokane Envlronmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 of 21
~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. EWIRONiNIENTAL EL.EMENTS (Conhnued):
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 36(4), 36(5), and 3c(2) of this
checklist). ~ - ~
re
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, ocher
~ shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, butcercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegf tation will be removed or alt red~
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
►V tym,?,,
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native planLS, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any.
5' N 1 k ~.-f-
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 11 of 21
~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL EI.EMENTS (Continued):
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ,
birds: hawk, heron, eagle son~bird~5,,~Ather. ~ ''`'S
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
~
~
V
c. Is the site part of a migration route? IF so, esplain.
j Z)
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
-ke~ ~s ae-~
6. ENERGY AND IV?,TURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc. (to'04-ve i~ Q'S rZ~t
4vo(s , C' ~ .
~ r.
b. Would your project affect the potentizl use of solar energy by zdjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. ~
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21
.
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. E1IVIRONMEIVTAL ELFiN1ENTS (Contmucd):
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or conrrol energy impacts, if any:
I 7~y~?~Lc
~J
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HE.ALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, includincr e:cposure to to.cic chemicals,
risk of fire and eYplosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe.
i
A/ ~
1) Describe special emerjency services that might be required.
.
ND it ~
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any:
NO
b. Noise
1) What rypes of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipmenc, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for e:cample: traffic) construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
6'4'k-a.-Q C c3Y(.,5 a->..- Z p/Sc~_- ,4--1~1,W'( G' ~ OLA.
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pase 13 of 21
v
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. EWIRONMENTAL ELFrMENI'S (Continued):
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
8. LAND AND SHOFELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties'
.
-:A 1.5 i S us Q-S ws e Q ( 2 s GL r2)Aka,l h a-u..S ifr.~
IS a. MAtf s~t . To ItLe (,c)OcS-F- *115 a s-izr
~
o r ~.s-~- % s a ~ ESp rrs sn S-~-a,~G~ -
- ,
b. Has the site een used for agriculture? If so, describe.
a ,
c. Describe any structures on the site.
J
d. Wi11
ZO-aa any structures be demolished? If so, which?
oT drA,&6h,ed~Ro i~L r
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
B--;? - 3 .
~ .
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checlclist Pa~e l~l o: 21
~
. ~
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
f. What is th current Comprehens*ve Plan designation of the site?
ITM ,r n r/2 ,
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline masLer program designation of the site?
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify.
/V
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
j. Appro:cimately how many people would the completed project displace?
I~one,
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
~Qes /1of G~
~
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with eXisting and projected
land uses and plans, if any- 41,
~~t.e
.
a,f-c a,, Ql&,4
Spokane Environment3l Ordinance Checklist Page 15 of 21
~
, ~ .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEN?S (Continued):
9. HousllvG
a. ApproYimately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
~ ~h • ! ~
b Approlximately how many units, if any, would be eliminaced? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
4b , LOo ~ . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
74 ,
.
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior build.in material(s) proposed?
~ -
'O
e Z
~
b. Whac view in the immediate viciniry would be alLered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any.
. . ~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 16 of 21
v'
• /
Evaluation For
A~ency Use Only
B. EWIRONMENTAL ELEiV1ENTS (Continued):
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mai nly occur? ~ r
4~
A-1 F~?O 1& -
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N§Ar--
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
I
Nmc"
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreacional opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
b. Would the proposed project displace any existinc, recreational uses? If so, describe.
0
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pa~e 17 of 21
. ~ .
Evaluation For
Agency Use-Only
B. ENVIRONVIEiN'I'AL ELEMENTS (Continued):
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Ooes .
` 1
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURr1L PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers, known to be on or ne:ct to Lhe site? If so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific
or cultural importance known to be on or next co the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol impacrs, if any:
bV &s " Af~
14. TRANSPORTATION
,
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access
to the existin~ street system. Show on site plans, if any.
j~ ~e .4-ile_ aeeess _4
b Is sire currencly served by public transiL? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop? qe~ '
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 18 of 21
• • ~ r
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIROIVMENTAL ELEIVIENTS (Continued):
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate? -2-
/
e7 r_
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streeu, or improvements to e:cisting roads
or streers, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public
or private). O
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oO water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. 170
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If knownindicate when peak volumes would occur.
-7- ' TA
. . ~
g Proposed measures to reduce or concrol transporcation impacts, if any:
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for eYample:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Chccklist Pa~e 19 of 21
:
, ~ .
Evaluation For
Accncy Use Onlv
B. ENVIRONi-VIEVTA.L ELEMENTS (Continued):
b. Proposed mezsures to reduce or control direct imnacts on public services, if any.
Does ,,l t ~ -
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle uti currentl available at the slce: electriciL~tural ~ aL~F re se
~rvi tele , sanit sepcic system, other.
b. Describe the ucilities that are proposed for the pro)ect, the utility providing the
service, and the general conscruction activities on the sice or in the immediace viciniry
which might be needed. .
z e, {r-, cI A4~'
,
A-w - gvw ,D
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury Lhat the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of
my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure
on my pan, che a(zencv may withdraw any determination of non-significance that it mt issue in reliance upon this
checklist.
Date: ~
Ponent:
Proponent: Pro
ease ty e or prin (Si~nature) ~
Address: City, State, Zip: C~ <
Phone: cc~o
.
Person completing the form. I3ate•
Phone: q2Z-700z,,--
Spokane Environmezt1 Ordinance Checklisz Page 20 of 21
! ~ ~ t
R
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff IVlember(s) Reviewing Checklist: .
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, che staff:
A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a
determination of nonsignificance (DNS).
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental unpacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a mitigaLed determination of nonsignificance with conditions {I IDNS).
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends
a determination of significance (DS).
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 21
RECEIVEL
• ' ~ ~ SPOKqNE COL :
, JaN
i
~ I' U It f~ N L ~~~3fh (D U DwIs
PLANNf h1G
l)!\'ItiION OI: ENCINEI:ItING AND ROAI.n A DIVISION Or T}iE ['UOUC WOItKS DCPARTMGNT
titi'illiam A. JohnK, l'.F., Caunly Gnginccr
~
<<tCYRrriWrNT 1,0 P~kY rrrS
ENCIvccii's
"I'llis agrec:mcnt bc<<veen Sl)uk-ane Coun(y ancl
t~-nt`~~r~nni
wItc~se interc:tit in llte projec;I is ~
~
is c:ittcrecl in(o lliis clay or .20 ~ 1."I-lii agrc;c:nicnt is 1~iflicable tu clic: 1)mjccl
~:IIU\\'ll ;15: •
~ L
f(1 ,,.['~"17
ger
'1'liat thr inclivi(fuals a»d parties na»1ed hereiii as havins an interest iii the above described properry or project agree
tu tlic following:
I. Rri»>bursc Sl)ol:;inc Coutity lur 1)ro .ject revim and inspectiun Iecs is speciiccl in Chctpler 9.14 or
tlic Spwkane Couiity Coc1e. '1'Iie I'e;es will be basecl un aclual salary costs incurrecl by Spokane
Coutity for project reviews and / or inspectiuns plus a ten percent aclministrltive cliarbe, aiid will
hc billecl montlily as accruecl. Any Uillin6 amouiits due, iiic:luclitib a»y expenses iiuUrred in llie
collection of aii overclue account, must be naid prior to tlie County's acceptance of the project for
lilins. If a project is arprovecl ancl/or lilecl with a balaiice still owins, lhc; unpaid halance shall be
paicl \villtiii 30 cl.iys ot ilie iitvcaice cJatc.,
'I'lie uiiclersiniteel iLrees iliat (licsc f'ecs are clue anci p<<ytiblc upon receipt of iIie hilling t►s speLiliccl
above.
3. :1tty invoiccs nut paicl within 30 ciays oI' iIie; invuic:e clace will be cunsictc:recJ clelinquc:lit. lf any
outstancling balance on the account for this project is not paicl within 30 days of the invoice clate,
iio furtlier reviews or the project docui»eiits wiU be eoiicluctecl until the entire account balance is
paid. Any Ualance on the account for iIiis projcct iiut pfiicl wi(hin GS days of the invoice clate »iay
result iii ler;al action or the iiiitiation or ather collectioii proccclures, iiicluding referral tu a
collectioii 76e»cy. '1'hc Sponsor will hc liahlc for any and nl( cxpeiiscs iruurrcd hy thc Couilty I'mr
thc collectioi, or ovcrcluc accounls.
•I. 'I'hc montlily billiiig sliuulcl bc scnt to tltic aucntiun o!':
4 ~
NAh1L: Li ~ 4 f r~ ` Z
~~UDRCSS: ~ ~v/~ e
~
CITI', STATC:
"I.I CO U C:
1'1IONC fJ: O~:r 00, ~ Nl: l/ • ' ~s>
~
~
r-Ax
C-Mai► N:
I uiicle:rm<<ncl dhmt f:tilure to pay lliese lecs i»,iy rcsul( in clehiy in compIetion or approval or tlic ~)rojcct or uther
pn"tiihle s,tnctic>>is. I
C] lt' this Ic:e: <tgreemc:nt is completecl by sonieone otlier than the Sponsor (i.e., (lie project o%vnci' 0r ~I
priruipal in the firm sponsoriiis tlie project), such as the Cnsineec desigiiing the praject, tlien
writteit atilliorizHtion frot» t ponsor snccific;illy authoc•izing llic A6c»t to cxccutc this Fcc
;1grcrmcnl is aelacliecl ii. ee Asreen it.
S1GNA"1'URC [3y: _
r~5
(l'Itt.N'I' NAti1E)
ltl."'Cl11tN 1'1.i,LOti1' COl'Y 'I'O S1101%'AN1? COUN'C1' l;NG1N1;1,1ZS
2n_c)lN►
1(12( W Ilromh%-ati' M,c Spul:»itc 11'A 99260-0170 (50'_)) 477-3600 I~ ,M (:119) 4?7-'_'?•t; 'I'I)I): (509) 324-31((
,
~SPO ~ CoUNTY D11►1SION oF BlIIT.13ING AND G...C)~ ENFORCEMENT ~
1026 vvEsx BROADwAx AVFr= . snos,ArE, WA 99260,0050
, . (509) 477-3675 /
{ STI'E INFORMATION FRO,ILCP IIVFORMATION ~
Site Address: 16911 E SPRAGiTE AVE Prnject Number: 01000257 Inv: 2 Issue Date:
SPOKANE, WA 00000 Wermit Use: ZONE CHANC3E
Parcel Nnmber. 45134.1768
Subdivision: UNKNODVN Apphc'ant; BLeARUCZYN, N
Block: I.4C: 2220 VERA CRFST DR
Zoning: B-2 Community Business VMZADALE, wA 99037-9032 Phone: (509) 924-8738
Owiter: BLAHUCZYN, N Contart: DAVID JEFFERiES
Address: 2220 VERA CREST DR Phane: (509) 926-7002
VERADALE, DVA 99037-9032
-Setbachs - Pront: Left: Right: Rear:
Inspector: DAN HOWAItD
Water Dist;
Grnup Name: unlatown
Project Name:
( PERMiT(s) ~
Zone Chana conkactor: lAcenae ,
ENQZIVEERS REVIEW S200.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REViEW S'1S•00
ItEZONL TO B-1, B-2, B-3 1 S1,B85.00 LTI`.Q.TTIES REVIEW $100,00
Tota] Pe,rntit Fee: $2,260.00
~ P,AYMENT SLJMMARY Page 1 of 1 NOTES ~
PERIv1IT Processed By: DVRIGHT, R.AE
Printed Ey: WENDEL, C3LORIA.
Tran Date Receip,t,# Pavinent Amt
~ 6 Gl 1/29/01 492 $2,260,00
~ Total Feea AmonntPaid AmountOwing
$2,260.00 $2,260 00 $0.00
1_
N O
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Divison of Building & Code EnfoYCeynent
Receipt
Receipt Nurrrber: 492 Customer Nurnber
Projects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr F6A,',i Oy
iqg PAID Pmt
01000257 2 $2,260.00 $2,260,00 -$2,260:04' $2,260.00 ~
Tolal: $2,260.00
Misceliaueous Items
Total PAID: $2,260.00
Tender
Y~pe C~ieel~ Accl .&tlance_ ~Nbr ` . • r : EV•Dgtti TENDERED
Ghow 27.24 ' 2,260.00
_ 7'ntal TE1Yl)ERED: 2,260.00
Over / (Short) $0.00
Cliange $0.00
Notes:
Tran Date / Tin:e: 1129101 3:11:07 PM
By: FHintz
LogofY User; gwendel
Station: GWENDEL
Override By:
Pfinled: l/Z9/013:II:11 PM Page 1 of 1
~ ~ ~ ~ 1
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! + ~ ~ ~ _
A ~ ~ + ~ i~~ ~H E~ ~ ~Q. ~ ~~~~v- ~ 1 ~
~ a ~ C f~t ~r~~L U1' ' T~ {~~R~
~ ~ I ~ 3 ~
~ I ~~r~ i _
I I i , ~I
~I I ~ ~ j
- ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
~ ~1' - ~GRAD~ ~t ~R~V~L ~ ~ r~ ~
~ _ ~ ~ ~ TO H~~~ , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;ye~
~ '
~ ~ I i'~ ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~ p I
r' ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ' i ~
~ ~ i
I I, I I f~~ ~
~ ~ ~ +to ~ ~ • ~ r~~• ~~f~A~E & G~RA'~E~
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ I
~ ~ ' i ~ ~ u~ Tt ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ,
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ +~c~ ~ ~ ~.~~:~a~~~ ~ ~~~v~~ ~ ~
~ ~ it~ HER~ ~
I J ~ I ~
~ 1 , ~
I + ~ i
~ I ~ `j ~ ~
fl ~ ~ - - ~~A~E 8C ~R A 4~ , ~ EL
~ ~ ~ ~ +~6~ ~ ~ ~ T~ ~~RE ~
a ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~y 1 ~ ; ~ ~ ~
1
~ ~
1
I ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ ' - ~F ~
~
II ~'I
~ ,
~ ~ ~i I ~ ~ I
~ 1 " ~ ~ ~~,~~~►o~~ ~ ~~~~~c~
~ ~ ~ ~I ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ +39 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ + i ~ c~ ~ i I ~
! fl ~ i _ ~
I ~ ~ - ~ i ~ ~ ~
;J~ ~ ; ~ ~ I , ~ ~Y~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ f
~ ~ ~ 1
~ ~ .
~ ~'~MUWE & ~~~LA~E ~
~
~ ~ j + ~ ~ ~ ~C~ HER~ - - ~ ~ L ~ I Iy~~ ~ ~i r5
I I~J ~ v ~ ~ C~ ~
~ ~ ~ C7 *.~r 1
I ~ ~ I ~ f
1
I j ~ ~ ~
~
I ~ o~
~ ~ tri i ~ ~ i ~ I ~
t ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ ; ~
~ I ~~~'~MC]V~ & REPL~,C~ ~
~ HEr`~,~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ '
~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~
T- fli
~ Lc
I i ~ Y
9 I I
I~ I 1 ~
~
I
~
~ ~ i
I ` ` i i
. . 6 . 4 4 ~ 4 a~ly ~ 4 4 4 . l
I I I ~
I
~
I
I I ~
I 7~.
~
~
I I 1
I
4 I
~ ~ ~ ~i I ,
~ • ~ e
I ~ 1
1 I ' +
. ~
~ I 1 ' ~
r ~ . . . . _ ~ e~ ~ . .
~ ~
II I I I
C~
~ 1II • ~ r • ~ ~ I . ~ • I I ~ °
I I ~ M II ~ ~,{~J ~ ~
~ P r, i Y ' ~ ~I 4~ X ~ ~ , 7~ _ 4~ i ~ ~ , X 7: . 7~,ry ,C ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ } ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , , T ~ \ , / t~' , , ,.~r' . J ~r7 / - ~ r t~ ! f ~~1 jl J ,1 ! _ _ ~ ~ 1
4l ~ 1 . f ~ _ ~ V , ~y ~ } ~ +'~~~„`z~ 11 . 41 -..`.4 L/ . - _ ~ ~
p , - a ~
n ~ , ~
~ ~ - ~ A y ~ ~ .
~ ~ { ~ I ~ I ~ V ' 1 ~ ~
~ 4.~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ J i
JI yI I I I ~ 13
- I I ' - ~ - ~ I - I I ~ ~ I 3 ~ I ~ ~ A I I I ~ h I^ I I I i 1 I I ~ r ~1 I
r~.. ~ ~ r,: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r~~. ~ . ) a , 5 ~ o 2 + ;95
~ ~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ - + • ~ ~
~ j,- ~ - ~ , . , , i . , _ I , ~ . ~ ~ . , 50
r ~ ~J ~ I e
~ I ' X ~ ~ r , 4r + ~ ~ 7Cl ~15
~ ~1~ , ~ ~ , ~ . 65
~ > ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I
. L . I~ ~ ~ ~'T~I ~ 1 ~
iiT " I
ic~n~ty MI'ap 0 ~
v u~
~ ^tt,~`~14~~~
1 itI
00 8idt1 rn
5 pu
~ $unc►
1{~i p C~
~ " ' - ~xw~el}
,"I'' I giker-000a
11i ~ M'qr~1~ ~
CJhalT
tvtax
11% ,i~OL~ it ~uNbka'rte~ q Q i7~~ ~ c'2
U
met
/ O
a~,~,,.~
v/do groadsva
_ c ~--.---'1 Sann~►etd .
- • p11c~
d
Ollve
N Go~b
A161 ~
SP
~mentaN
~
o Spra
~ r.
d 3tc1
c. ~ ?z~
4th ~
> ~ a
ja' 3~ ~
s Elemen=arY ~
l~+aN- Greerlec
~ ° - , _ _ 'a gth
Ai .~-►R~r1r~ ' _ _ _ ~
I SthP ~i S` j~,u4j%%j~
l I is itu~1 , ~dgeto
`t .
~ gth !Oth
`i~;; Pvt ~ ` ` • _ .
~ 4i J~11 ~t)~ til~~t,
1
G 7. r4l . ~ r
N yt d
C m h 4vt
Co`
2.4
$en1Or Hlgh -o `'y b
~
enirai 1teY C)
u ~
~ ~
~
E
11b ~ 1 30
o "`fi, Ui 1
1?th ~ 1
~ .
ci.
00 a
n
y
U 2Ud 3 ►P
\tia6jty t~AaP
~ ~,~1~ 7 ~t traund~ 01l30J0~
166
Sca'P-inch-
_ t
i
f
t ~ m
i ..ry
w
G-
8
i
{ 4 8
C^~ ~ w
# yX ' M
I
rr
F p a
I
. . .
_....W.~...~
p~ w
. - ~ . , K..~.. . _ .
1
o
1
k
F
~ ~
~ ~
I
I
I
''R.:
7
$ I I i
t
a . „ ~ ~
. W e ,
at ~ .t F' ' . r ! x. x, W
✓ ~ + _ ~ rt t + a ~r
i ~ t ~ ~ ~ e as #a . a r'a
1
-
x
i
}
a
J
~ 1 i 1 i t 1 a
i d'`. 3.
r
p:'
i
' a.
. . . . . . . . .
w x xr" x ~ x <f ~ ~
9 fi q p W w.... v~ x v'x x r r
r r~ xn Ax.. y n x r
E
r r r.
W n x @~ K i~., r
x x. q,S w, x' ?
~ • ~ r ~^.p. ~
.a as y
, i
".;ti:. G~.
a:,
J a
,
i
r ®
~ a
I
•a
a " .,w .
,.s ~ ~ ti n, ~ 9a y ~ ~ . , :tea,. i ro
w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i y ,6 x m.
a.5 ~ '.P "5m d:
.t.. 1uC
I
.a: .a< 8 ~r. ~
fi':"
t
~ X
7 + r. µ
. . .
.
w
3 i
d
d
{
i
m # 9 d
n A