Loading...
ZE-0013-01 . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: Zone Reclassification from the UR-3.5 ) FTNDINGS OF FACT, Zone to the UR-22 Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Applicant: Greg Blessing ) AND DECISION File No. ZE-13-01 ) ) This matter coming on for public hearing on October 17, 2001, the Hearing Examiner, after review of the zone reclassification application and the entire record, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision: 1. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The application requests a rezone of 1.63 acres of land from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, for those uses allowed in the UR-22 zone. 2. The site is generally located south of Valley Way Avenue, east of Sullivan Road, in the SW '/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 3. The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel nos. 45133.1223 and 45133.1218. 4. The applicant for the proposal is Greg Blessing, 9 South Washington Street, Suite 701, Spokane, WA 99201. The site owner is Dennis and Christine Anderson, P.O. Box 607, Liberty Lake, WA 99019-0607. 5. The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearing Examiner Ord.inance (County Resolution No. 96-0171) and the County Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure (County Resolution No. 96-0294). 6. The requirements for notice of public heanng were met. 7 The Hearing Examiner conducted a site visit on October 15, 2001. 8. A public heanng was held on the proposed rezone on October 17, 2001. 9. The following persons testified at the public hearing: Jim Falk, Division of Planning Scott Engelhard, Division of Engineering 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 1 ~ + Greg Blessing Lee Smith 9 South Washington 15701 East Valley Way Spokane, WA 99201 Veradale, WA 99037 10. The County Division of Planning issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the project on September 28, 2001. 11. The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Comprehensive Plan, the County Arterial Road Plan maps, the County Zoning Code, other applicable development regulations, and land use decisions in the vicinity. 12. The record includes the documents in the project file at the time of the public hearing, the documents and testimony submitted at the public hearing, and the items taken notice of by the Hearing Examiner. 13. The site is approximately 1.63 acres in size and is relatively flat in topography. Three single-family residences and related accessory structures currently exist on the site. 14. A specific site plan was not submitted for the proposal. The existing homes would be removed for site development, which will likely consist of offices, or a mixed multi-family and office use. The site would be served with public sewer and water, and modern utilities. 15. Effective January 1, 1991, the zoning of the site was reclassified from the Agncultural zone of fihe now expired County Zoning Ordinance to the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, under the Pxogram to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The site is also located in the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Zoning Code. 16. The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Major Commercial category lies approximately 100 feet west of the site, and also 340 feet south of the site. The Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan extends along Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue, and along Broadway Avenue, east of Conklin Road, in the area. 17. The County Arterial Road Plan designates Valley Way Avenue as a Collector Arterial. Sullivan Road, Broadway Road and Sprague Avenue in the area are all designated as Principal A.rtenals. Sullivan Road is located approximately 230 feet west of the subject property, while Sullivan Road is located less than 1,000 feet to the south. The Interstate 90 (I-90)/Sullivan Road freeway interchange is located approximately one-half mile north of the site 18. The land bordenng Sullivan Road, the land lying between Broadway Avenue and I-90, and the land located along Sprague Avenue in the area is almost exclusively zoned either Regional Business (B-3) or Community Business (B-2), and developed for intensive commercial uses. A Neighborhood Business (13-1) zone is found 400 feet northwest of the site. The land uses and zoning surrounding the site are accurately described in the Staff Report. 19. The site and area are located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 2 ~ f 20. The Staff Report accurately analyzes the consistency of the project with the relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and with the UR-22 zone. The Hearing Examiner hereby adopts and incorporates such analysis by reference as findings of fact herein. 21. The only opposition to the proposal was expressed by the owner of a single-family residence located on a 1.8-acre parcel lying directly northeast of the site, across Valley Way Avenue. The parcel is long and narrow, with a 38-foot wide neck that extends south to Valley Way from the main portion of the site. The main portion of the parcel is 150 feet wide. Such owner expressed concern with the volume of traffic along Valley Way Avenue, the difficulty of turning left at the intersection of Valley Way and Sullivan Road to the west, drivers cutting through his property to reach the Walmart store located along the north side of Broadway to the northeast, and the lack of a specific site plan for the proposal. See testimony of Lee Smith. 22. County Engineering conditions for the proposal require the applicant, along the frontage of the site, to dedicate right of way; set aside a future acquisition area for right of way; and improve Valleyway Avenue to a Collector Axterial standard, including the installation of additional asphalt, sidewalk and curb. The applicant is also required to supply detailed traffic infonnation to County Engineering at the time a specific site is submitted for development of the site under the UR-22 zone, to determine the impacts of the project on traffic infrastructure in the area, and potential mitigation of such impacts. 23. The intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley Way Avenue currently does not meet traffic warrants for signalization. Depending on the cumulative traffic impacts from the project, existing traffic and other approved development at the time a specific site plan is submitted, the applicant may be required to participate in signalization of the subject intersection, or other off- site improvements. The conditions of approval adequately mitigate the significant, probable adverse impacts of the project. 24. The UR-22 zone conta.ins sigruficant landscaping and screening requirements for land development, including special buffering for adjacent land that is zoned UR-3.5. The site abuts Community Business (B-2) zoning on the west, and UR-3.5 zoning on the east. On May 7, 2001, the Hearing Examiner approved a rezone to the UR-22 zone, without a specific site development plan, for property located directly northwest of the subject property, along the north side of Valley Way Avenue. See File No. ZE-34-00. On February 21, 2001, the Examiner approved a rezone to the UR-22 zone of eight (8) acres located approximately 1,000 feet east of the site, along the south side of Valley Way Avenue, to allow the development of 125 multi-dwelling units. See File No. ZE-20-00. 25. No deficiencies with regard to the project's compliance with development regulations have been established in the record. The project has been conditioned for compliance with the development standards of the UR-22 zone and other applicable provisions of the County Zoning Code, and the recommendations of the commenting public agencies. As conditioned, the project will be reasonably compatible with, and not have a significant negative impact on, neighboring land uses. The proj ect, as conditioned, generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 26. No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the proposal by the County Division of Planning. The proposal will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment, and the Examiner concurs with issuance of the DNS. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 3 V ~ The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code have been met. 27. Changed conditions have occurred since the zoning of the site was re-designated to the UR-3.5 zone on January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. This includes the availability of public sewer to the subject property; road improvements to Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue in the area; the rezoning and development of land along Valley Way Avenue, Sprague Avenue, Sullivan Road and Broadway Avenue in the area for commercial development; increased population growth in the area; and designation of the site within the County's rUGA boundaries. Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following: II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The proposed rezone, as conditioned, generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed rezone bears a substantial relationship, and will not be detrimental, to the public health, safety or welfare. 3. A change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant the proposed rezone, and a substantial change of circumstances has occurred in the area since the site was last zoned. 4. The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance have been met. The proposal, as conditioned, will not have a sigruficant, probable adverse impact on the environment. 5. The proposed rezone meets the criteria established by Washington case law for approving a rezone, and the criteria established in paragraphs 14.402.020 (1)(2) of the Cou.nty Zoning Code for amending the County official zoning map. 6. Approval of the land use application is appropriate under section 11 of the County Hearing Examiner Ordinance, adopted by County Resolution No. 96-0171. III. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a rezone to tlze Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of approval of the public agencies stated below. Any conditions of such agencies that have been added or significantly revised by the Hearing Examiner are italccazed. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 4 / ~ Failure to comply with the conditions of tlus approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not wa.ive the applicant's obligation to comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction. SPOKA.NE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLAN1vING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owners, developers and users of the property, and their heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The zone change applies to the parcel of land legally described in the Planning File No. ZE- 13-01, which parcel is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel nos. 45133.1223 and 45133.1218. 3. Priox to any site development or issuance of a building pernut, the applicant shall submit a site development plan to the County Division of Plarmng, which contains deta.iled specifics for buildings, structures, landscaping, signs, parking and other improvements required to implement conditions of approval and development regulations. 4. The site shall be developed in conformance to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone and all other applicable provislons of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 5. Spokane County Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice t11at specifies a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way. The Division of Planning shall release the Title Notice, in full or in part, when it is no longer necessary. The Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 12.5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities adjacent to Valley Way, in addition to the newly dedicated right-of-way along Valley Way. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 2.5 feet of new dedication. b. Building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, ground water percolations areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be pnvate property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 5 ~ e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 6. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice, which notes that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. The Title Notice sha.ll serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: "The parcel of property legally described as [insert legal description] is the subject of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on December 6, 2001, approving a rezone of said property and imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-13-01 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning." 7. The Division of Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of Chapter 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay zone) of the Spokane County Zoning Code. The property that is the subject of this notice is more particulaxly described as follows: [insert legal description from File No. ZE-13-01]." SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT 1. The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the state Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements. SPOK.ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior to the issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first: 1. The applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for nght of way. Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: 2. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 6 J 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the April 3, 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other standards and laws that are applicable to this proj ect. Final plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit. 4. A parkang plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 6. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valley Way Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the additlon of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the developrnent. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Cou.nty Resolution No. 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work with.in the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way Avenue as a 70-foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from the centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recomrnended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valley Way Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Valley Way Avenue. 12. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 7 ti regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 14. The zone change did not include a specific development proposal or site plan. At such time as a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic informafiion for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on sunounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation may be required for off-site improvements. SPOKA.NE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service need not be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILTTIES 1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated watez usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees. 2. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit histoncal and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal. 3. Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 8 r 4. Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development. 5. Any water service for this proposal shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All applicable air pollution control regulations sha11 be met. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 1. The District will have requirements at the time of building permit application. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 9 ti DATED this 6`" day of December, 2001 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER ~ CMichel C. Dempsey, WSBA #8 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, as modified by County Resolution No. 1-0700, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassificahon is final and conclusive unless within fourteen (14) calendar days from the Examiner's written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant, and by regular mail to other parties of record, on December 6, 2001. THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS DECEMBER 20, 2001.. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be inspected dunng normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County. Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130, affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-13-01 Page 10 r E~tr~~.•~-- ' t , ~HEET . ;\5 E3Uilt NIaf13 IZCCCtvCa Rezone File ZE-0013-01 -01 Etuad Plans Approvcd c'ompaniun Files: Nru• Road St:,rdurds 5-I 5-95 R4}•lur 4- Rclated Ntles: Hcuring: 10117l2001 1:30 8uilding Ilept: T'cchnical Rrviev►- 081092001 2:13 , i-{arvurd Rd Pfan El Eng Spccial Fccs Prrlirntnaty Ftcvicw: '1'}pc: _ I.argC Lot Dldg. Squarc Fret Dace rtcceivra: 07a4r001 Na. l.ats: Nn. Acccs: 1.63 Project tiame UR-3.5 TO UR-22 sice ndareSS W. Maaar.-.. N. srRAc;UL, E. SULL[Vr1N, N. VALLEN'WAY. %pplicant Rangr-Tuwnship-Src:tion: 44 - 25 - 13 PARCEL(S): (first 20) titles,mg („ndittons Mai{ed: 45133.121$ 45I33.1223 Flaoci Zanc No Q S %Va01inc;tom St \h'utrr 5aurze tiYC1KANE, WA 49201- Scwcr Sourcr f'honc (509) 747-7777 " Sthool nist 356 f•ux -(5(19) t125-1 8U0 Firc Dist 1 !'ixinc DiSt Eng Hilliag Uw•ncr f?n Ardc,or Cfi Anc4esnn tiurveyor 3'i) I3~7N e)il:' lamrs LV Stillingcr Pi ! tt i>it:' ! IBrRTti' L.AKI:. WA 991119- LIBFRTY I.AKE, WA 99019- DURTSC1t1 K A& ASSaC tNC. Fhnne (509) 891-089? (S09) 89l - I ?Rb f'hutir (SO'I) 89l-OK9? (S(?9) 891-1386 F~,~ (5pg` 972-z332 I IAYUE.N LAKE, ln 83835 1"O E3()X 704 Fax (509) 9~~-3?32 Yfione (208) 772•2233 .Signcd Namt: UP ANDER50N l3uildin* 477•3675 ,Tlanning 477-7240 iEinginerr 477-3600 C;nntact R/P I1M FALK Cc►ntart EnZ SCOTT ENCrL-LHARD Date Submittecl DescriPtion initints f:ng Need TcchnicaUy Complrte Eng Nccd I tnrvard Rd Mitigntian i:ng nrcd Dt'iinbec Nlans Eng Need TrufTic Analysis Eng Nccd Other Wp-! 12;j,11 E=»e Agrc:e Pay Fcrs Rtccivrd Eng Final Plat fees Comptcted Capy io Acrnunting I:ng Agrrc f'tiority Fees arccived 071181?Ut1l Eng Prclim Plat Ccrs Campletcd Natire to Pubiir / Nuticr w Public # 1 3 4 6 Comple:tcd - or Needs to be signed nnlCS (Irt-(liit) ui i auaiihea oc drainabc itcm ralcufated !]caring Uatc Urc,sion App ! [kn t'wttl Appid ACC' ,appenircl to BCC Der+sion App T)cn Cnnd Appld Court Appeulal to Cuurt Ikciriun App Den Cond AppW , Stnmpaf yfy(3rs to Sccretary (Sandy) 5tannpcd 209 Loi i'lans to ticcretary (Sjindy) ~ lti[oJh:i S1:IIu.ti ENGINEER~'S RE''sENti'-SHEET t~Glt~"C :%s eu>>t Pla„s PxccivCd Rezone File ZE-0013-01 -01 Ruaa PianS Approti•ca con,pa,ian r>>es Nc« ko:►d Y:f?1111,ln ; : A1•.1::; ttrirteJ Fitrs_ 1[c~rin~: l3w1ding Ucpt: 7'cchnical Revic%;° 08!()912001 2:15 I lmard Rd Alan Cng Sprcial Fecs Preliminary RCview: Type: L.urgr Lot aldg. Squarc feet Uate Rtcerved: 07I2412001 Na i..ots: Nu. Acrcs: 1_63 f'roject Name UR-3.5 TO LIR-22 SiLc Address AtC){)RE, N. SYRAGUF. F tiUU.IVAN. N. VaLl_EYWAY, t ?0) .applicant &-ed lZun~tc-Township-Sectian: ~34 - 25 - 13 PARCEL(S): fr.s (jres: 11;cs~inc uri~liiiurt5 Nluiled: ~(,r,,~~' 45133 I22; 45133.1215 Fla)d Zanc Na S I taward tic .,t) l WaLCr SoUrce tik'OKANE, V1'A 99201- Sewcr Suurrc 1'hanc (509)747-7777 ~ Schaoi Dist 356 Fat 1509) b.', i- I Rf10 Fire Dtst 1 Yhone Dist E:ng Eiilling Uwnrr :~r~Jt:,,~, Dp Ar.Jr$or , Survcyor IU (jl 1.1 (iii~ Jamcs Stillinger ! II3Elt'I'Y LAKE. WA 99119- nt!RTSCHI K A& ASS(1C INC. ( II3ERTY t-AICE.1VA 99019- P}ipi1C I509)$91-0892 (509)891-128b }'tionr 1,504) 891-0892 (509) 891-I286 Fax (509) 922-333: HAyUE?V LAKE, ID 83835 i'n nOX 704 Fax (504) 422-3332 Phoric (208) 772-2233 ~littted Natnc: DP APIDEftSQN i3uilding 477-36751F'laining 477-7200 IEngineer 477•3600 Cuntuct H/P 1[h1 FALK Contiut Eng SCnTT ENGELFIARD Date Submitted Description Initials Eng Nc.~cxi Tcchnicatty con,ric:c Eng 1Verd ElaTvard R►1 Mitigation I:ng Nccd I)rairuige Plnns Lng Need Tratric Anulysis Fng Nrrd Qther o-'1 1;2001 F..ng Agrec E'ay Fces fteerivcd ~ Eng Finnl I'lat Eees Cumplelcd Cary ta Accottnting t:ng Agrer Priority Fees Rrceived 07/1812001 Eng Prrlim hlal Ftcs Complcted Voticr to Publir / Nutice to Aabtic t+ 1 ? 4 G C'ompleteci - or Ncwds t.o lx signcd Iksivn f ~~•.:atiiri?:,tc, (ln-0uU 1;,~~3 y«a:,c,F~ drainagc itcm calcu{ated fi4:►ring I'ralr Urr1s1011 App Drn 4_'uil.S :lppld li('C Appealcd to I3CC tkfiician App Dcn Cfind App1J C'uurt ~pn~:;c+l Caurt Docixion App i)en Cond Appld , ~!j:c,ptd Mylars tn Sc.-Tecary (Sandy) 1':SII1pckl 2()}± LU: 1ll:1I7~ Io Stcfc'L1.*y (Saflijv) ■ , ~ ~ I, STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER " File ZE-13-01 A" u~ 0 mri DIVISION OF PLANNING SPOKAIV, COUWY HEARING DATE: October 17, 2001 @ 1:30 P.M. FILE ZE-13-01 PROJECT PLANNER: Jim Falk, Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 Zone. A specific site development plan is not proposed. Project Data Project Location: The site is generally located south of Valley Way, approximately 400 feet east of Sullivan Road, in the SW'/ of Section 13, Township 25 N, Range 44 E.WM. Parcel Numbers: 45133.1223 and 45133.1218 Owner and Appticant: Greg Blessing, 9 S. Washington, Suite 701, Spokane, WA. 99201 Agent: None Comprehensive Plan Urban (U) Designation: Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Existing Land Use: Single family dwellings and associated accessory improvements. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: • East: Parcels east of the subject site are zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), previously classified Agricultural (A) in 1942. Land use to the east of the site consists of inedium density single family dwellings on '/z acre to 1 acre parcels. • West: The adjacent zoning to the west is Community Business (6-2) established in 1991 and 1993, previously classified Commercial (C ) in 1960. The land uses to the west of the site consist of various commercial retail uses. File No. ZE-13-01 Staff Report - October 17, 2001 Public Heanng 1 of 8 . • North: ' Parcels immediately north of the subject site are zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22), previously classified Agricultural (A) in 1942. Land uses to the north of the site consist of low density single family homes on '/Z acre to 5 acre lots. • South: The adjacent zoning to the south is Community Business (B-2) established in 1991, previously classified Commercial (C) in 1989. The land uses to the south consist of commercial retail. Knawn Land Use Proposals and Recent project approvals (since 1990) within '/z Recent Project Approvals in the mile of the area include: Area of this Project: • ZE-20-98C, a 2 acre rezone from Urban Residential-7 to Urban Residential-22 on Valley Way 220 feet west of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley Way. • BSP-47-96, a Binding Site Plan creating 2 commercial lots in a Regional Business (B- 3) Zone 170 feet north of the northwest comer of Sullivan Road and Sprague Avenue. • ZE-04-98, a 2.5 acre rezone from Community Business (B-2) to Regionat Business (B-3) located between Sullivan Road and Conklin Road and fronting on Sprague Avenue. • ZE-27-89, a 26 acre parcel that was previously classified in 4 zones was classified to Community Business (6-2) and Suburban Residential-1/2 (SR-1/2) located between Valley Way and Sprague Avenue on the east side of Sullivan Road. • BSP-55-97, a Binding Site Plan creating 3 commercial parcels in a B-3 Zone located at the northeast corner of Broadway and Sullivan Roads. • ZE-34-91 C, a Change of Conditions to allow for 346,542 square feet of retail space located near the northeast comer of Broadway and Sullivan Roads. • ZE-34-00, a 1.75 acre zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential -22 (UR-22) located immediately north of the subject parcel and fronting on Valley Way. Land Division Status: The subject parcels are tax parcels of record created by the County Assessor. Both parcels are a portion of Tract 28 of the old Vera Subdivision. File No. ZE-13-01 Staff Report - October 17, 2001 Public Hearing 2 of 8 Moreiine besignation; Not applicable. *ater Purveyor: The proposal is located in Vera Irrigation District " #15. Water service will be provided from an existing public water supply when approved by the Spokane Regional Health District. sewage Uisposai: Tfie Spokane County sewer system is available to serve the site. A sewer line is located in front of the project site under Valley Way Avenue. Plans and specifications for connection to the . ' sewer will be reviewed prior to the issuance of - any sewer connection pemnit or building permit. Hre Utstrict 0: - The proposal is located in Fire District No. 1. School District and nearest K-1 Z The proposal is located in the Central Valley Schools: School District No. 356. Progress Elementary School, Evergr+een Jr. High and Central Valley High School are the K-12 public schools located nearest to the proposal. Nearest Arterial and Distance: I'he subject property is located 400 feet east of Sullivan Road, a Principal Arterial. The property site also fronts on Valley Way, a Collector Arterial. Nearest Parks and Distance: Terrace View and Sullivan Parks are the County parks located nearest to the proposal. Terrace View Park is located approximately 2.5 miles south of the subject site. Sullivan Park is approximately one mile north of the subject site. Neighborhood Assoclation: None identified. • This proposal is located inside the IUGA. e This proposal is located inside a Public Transportation Benefit Area (PT6A). • This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands. GM/4/Critical Areas Aquifer Recharge Area: - This proposal is located inside of the Pdority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and inside of the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. Fish & Wildlife Ha6itat Conservatian No priority wildlife species are Iocated Areas: on the site per the Spokane County Wildlife Map. Ftoadplain: A review of the FIRM indicates that the • proposal is located outside of any - floodplain. Geologically Hazardaus Areas: No Geologically Hazardous Areas are indicated on the Spokane County Geologically Hazardous Soils Map. Wetlands; No wetlands are indicated per the Spokane County Wetlands Maps. Fite No. ZE•13-01 Staff Report - October 17. 2001 Public Hearing 3 of 8 SEPA r _DNS issued September 28, 2001. Comment period ends October 15, 2001. The appeal period ends the same time as the appeal time frame for the proposed land use action expires. Noticinq Published: Spokesman Review on September 28, 2001. Mailing and Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for site posting and mailing the Notice of Hearing to affected agencies and property owners/taxpayers of property Iocated within 400 feet of the subject property was October 1, 2001. 1724 Compliance Dates Application Accepted (Counter Complete): July 18, 2001 Technically Complete/Determination of Completeness issued: August 30, 2001. Date fVotice of Decision is due: December 29, 2001 Reviewinq Agencies Thirteen (13) Agencies were notified on July 24 and September 19, 2001. Corntnents were due August 9 and October 3, 2001. q~ sncies-N'oti~etl=r==~~- ;ResRonse D~~e' ~Irgeneies=~No~6d~' sp~nse~- I~Date~;+~rb_~ 9 _ - - ~ "Rece = ived-' = !~Reeeived~ Division of Engineering Yes 8/9/01 Wash. State No ~ and Roads 9/25/01 Boundary Review Board Development Yes 8/2/01 Central Valley School No Engineering Services District # 356 Spokane County Yes 8/7/01 Spokane Transit No Division of Utilities Authodty Spokane County No Fire District No. 1 Yes 7/26/01 Stormwater Utility Spokane Regional Yes 8/9/01 Vera Water & Power Yes 7/26/01 Health District 10/2/01 Office of Historic No Spokane County Air Yes 7/25/01 Preservation Pollution Control Authority Division of Building and Yes 6/3/01 Code Enforcement Responses from the Public: No written responses from the public_hav,e been received. Description of the Site: The subject property fronts ,on the south side of Valley Way and it is relatively flat. Three single family dwellings and related accessory structures exist on the site.~ With site development the existing homes will be removed. Descript6on of the Surroundin4 Neighborhood:- The surrounding neighborhood is a mix of development that includes community and regional serving businesses, a power substation, major church complex, low and medium density single family dwellings, undeveloped parcels and pasture land. The zaning designations within 1000 feet of the_ project site include Neighborhood Business (B-1), Community Business (B-2), Regional Business (B-3), Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22). Land uses in File No. ZE•13-01 Staff Repo►t - October 17. 2001 Public Hearing 4of8 . the surrounding area include single. familp dwellings, professional office buildings and a variety of commercial retaii uses. Interstate 90 is approximatefy %a mile north of the project site and parceis east and west of Sullivan Road are zoned Regional Business (13-3) and Community Business (13- 2) with some parcels zoned Neighborhood 6usiness (B-1). Parcels fronting on both sides of Sullivan Road from Interstate 90 to Sprague Avenue are developed with a variety of commercial uses and the Sprague Avenue corridor south of the subject site is heavily developed with regional serving businesses. The commercial uses adjacent and south of the subject parcel front on Sprague Avenue. Sullivan Road is 400 feet west of the project site and is classified a Principal Arterial by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Sullivan Road and fronting properties together form a major commercial corridor connecting Interstate 90 and the north Spokane Valley area with Sprague Avenue about 1,200 feet south of the project site. Valley Way Avenue is classified a Collector Arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan. Valley Way has 40 feet of right of way and the Arterial Road Plan requires 70 feet of right of way. To implement the County Arterial Road Plan the Division of Engineering is requiring a road dedication and is asking for afuture acquisition reserve area in its recommended conditions of approval. Peolect Descriation and Background: The reclassification application was submitted in July, 2001 to reclassify the subject parcels from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for those uses allowed in the UR-22 Zone. No site development plan was submitted with the reclassfication application. A Technical Review meeting was held on August 9, 2001 and the application was determined to be Technically Complete on August 30, 2001. The appficant does not propose a specific site development plan. The applicant is seeking a generic zone reclassification for -all those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 Zone so that he may develop or market the parcels for any use pemnitted in the Urban Residential-22 Zone without subsequent review by the Hearing Examiner. Staff Analysis: Comprehensive Plan: The project site is located in the Urban Category of the Comprehensive Plan and the area suROUnding the project sfte is also designated Urban. A Major Commercial designation exists 204 feet west of the subject s'rte adjacent to Sullivan Road. The Urban category is intended to provide a city-like environment which includes various land uses, public facilities and services. Urban areas will be the most intensely developed of 'all categories and is primarily a residential category intended for single family, twafamily, multifamily, and condominium buildings with residential net densities ranging from 1 to 17 dwelling units per acre. Although the site is not necessarily intended for multi family dwellings, the requested Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) aone is intended to implement the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and allows a maximum residential net density of 22, dwelling units per acre as allowed by Chapter 14.622 (UR-22 Zone) of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Multifamily structures are a transitional use between single famiiy residential and the more intensive areas. The zoning designations within 1000 feet of the project site include Neighborhood 6usiness (13-1), Community Business (B-2), Regional Business (13-3), Urban Residential-3.5 and Urban Residential-22. Land uses in the surrounding area include single family dwellings, professional office buildings and numerous businesses retailing a variety of goods and services. Due to the mix of zones and land uses and the close proximity to arterial roads in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcels, the trend away from single family dwellings to more intensive development within the vicinity is well established. The Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines identified in Section 1 of the Comprehensive Plan are used to determine whether a proposal in the Urban category should be approved, approved F!e No. ZE-13-01 Staff Repcrt - Octbber 17, 2001 Public Hearing 5of8 with conditions or denied. A description, of the applhcable Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines is provided below and an analysis of how the proposal does or does not comply with these policies. Detailed Definition B specifies that urban areas will be the most intensely developed of,all the categories, it is primarily intended for residential category of single family, two family and multifamily uses along with certain neighborhood commercial and light industrial uses. The more intensive land uses will be located near the heavily traveled streets, while the least intensive residential uses will be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic. Detailed Definition D states that due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in the Urban category, few land use activities would be inappropriate. Many uses may require screening or other standards to make them compatible with one another. The subject property is located near Sullivan Road, a heavily traveled Principal Arterial, and it fronts on a Collector Arterial, a street, having a modest level of traffic. If the subject parcel is developed with multifamily dwellings or professional offices, screening and buffering from adjacent low density residential development will be required by the Spokane Zoning Code. Goal 1.1 and related Objectives and Decision Guidelines encourage a variety of housing types and densities within Urban areas. "Fill-in" is promoted within developed areas where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities have already been established. Higher density developments such as multifamily should be located with direct or near direct access to major arterials and planned/existing public transit routes rather than on interior neighborhood streets. It is recommended that when multifamily dwellings are to be located adjacent to single family areas, careful consideration must be given to density and design of the multifamily development so as to ' ensure protection of the amenities of the single family area. The site is currently developed to medium density ~single_ family homes. The proposal can be considered "fill-in" development as the surrounding properties are all developed at various stages of intensity, ranging ftom regional serving commercial businesses to large single family dwelling tracts. The site is located adjacent to Valley Way which is identified as a Collector Arterial by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Sullivan Road, a Principal Arterial, is 400 feet to the west of the subject property and is currently served by public transit. Public utilities and senrices are available to serve the site and include public water and sewer, paved streets, electricity,, telephone, gas, cable services, schools, parks and libraries. Manned fire stations, medical facilities, and post offices are also available. Decision Guidelines 1.3.3 and 1.6.1 recommend the provision of sanitary and storm sewer for developments to protect water quality when the provision is consistent with County plans, policies, and regulations. Public sewers are available to serve the site. Stormwater containment and filtr.ation consistent with Spokane County Stormwater Management Guidelines will be required with site development. Decision Guideline 1.5.1 recommends the use of buffering and/or landscaping to mitigate the difference between proposed business uses and existing residential uses. Section 14.806.040 of the Spokane County Zoning Code requires,a strip of Type I landscaping, a minimum of'20 feet'in width, along all property lines adjacent to,the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone. The subject site is bordered on the east, south and north by the UR-3.5 Zone. In addition, Section 14.622.365 of the Zoning Code (UR-22 Zone) requires a six (6) foot high fence, wall or solid landscaping to be constructed along the property boundaries. This requirement is intended to supplement the required landscaping. Decision Guideline 1.5.4 recommends that sidewalk facilities be required along arterials connecting residential areas with commercial area. The proposal as conditioned will require the construction of sidewalks along the Valley Way frontage. File No. ZE•13-01 Staff Report - Odober 17, 2001 Public Hearing 6of8 , Objective 1.5.e recommends that when aveighborhood experiences pressure for a change 'of character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review. The,subject property is experiencing pressure for change. The property has direct access to an arteriai and it is within close proximity to a larger transportation network. Commercial uses are found west of the site along the east side of Sullivan Road. The area west of the site has been developing into a dense commercial area. This same type of transition is occumng on properties located to the south of Valley Way. The proposed use is a more intensive use than what currently exists in the adjacent area east of the sfte along Valley Way which is low and medium density single family dwelljngs. Required landscaping, fenc+ng and building setbacks will help to reduce impacts to residential homes located along Valley Way east of and adjacent to the subject site. Goal 1.6, Objecfive 1.6.a and Decision Guideline 1.6.1 recommend that an orderly pattern of development be established in relation to the extension of water and sewer service. Prior to approval land use proposals should conform to utility and transportation plans and take steps to mitigate impacts on existing utility and transportation systems. The site will be served by the Vera Irrigation Districi #15 and the County sewer system. The Division of Utilities,and ttie Division of Engineering have recommended conditions of approval to ensure consistency with utility and transportation plans. Prior to release of building permits the project proponent will be required to demonstrate compljance with the Spokane Regional Health District and Vera Irrigation Dis#rict #15 water service requirements. The proposal is located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. Section 10 of the Comprehensive Plan addnesses water quality protection. This chapter is intended to coordinate land uses over aquifers in the County. The recommended conditions of approval require comptiance with the Spokane County Zoning ASA Overlay Zone requirements specified by Section 14.706 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Additionally, the recommended conditions of approval require compliance with Spokane County stormwater management regulations which inctude stormwater filtration requirernents. Decision Guideline10.1.6 states that new utban and suburban type developments within the adopted sewer service areas, dependent upon location, shall be conditioned to require immediate connection to sewer. Objective 10.1.d specifies that "fill-in" development and development with densities that support existing or proposed sewer systems will be preferred. The Spokane County sewage collection system is available to the project site and the County is willing and able to serve the proposal assuming the applicant complies with all County sewer connection requirements. The proposal as conditioned will require connection to the public sewer system. !n summary, the proposal as conditioned is genera►I!y consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan if developed as conditioned. The project site is also located in the IrYterim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) established pursuant to RCW 36.70A, the Growth Management Act and Spokane County Resolution No. 97- 0321. Zoning: The purpose of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set standards for orderly developrnent of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values. It is the intent of this zone to be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities, and as an impiementation tool for the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. General characteristics of these areas include paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to schools and libraries, and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit accessibility. The highest density residential zone, UR-22, is intended primarily for multifamily dwellings, less intense office space and is usually located adjacent to major or secondary arterials. It is used as a transition between low and medium density multiple family uses and intensive commercial or low intensity indust(ial uses and to provide for a higher density housing in locations.close to File No. ZE-13-01 StaB Report - October 17, 2001 Publlc Headng 7of8 employment, shopping and major transportatioti roates wtTere movements of peopie can be 1 handled efficiently and with the least overall adverse impacts. The site is located adjacent to a Coliector Arterial (Valley Way) and 400 feet from Sullivan Road, a Principai Arterial. Spokane County will provide sewer service to the site. Vera Irrigation District will provide water service to the site. Schools are in the vicinity of the site and are available for future needs. Other services available include manned fire protection, public transit, police protection, solid waste collection and a post,office. The site is located in an area transitioning from low/medium density residential uses to intensive commercial uses. lhe proposal is generally consistent with the purpose and intent of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. The variety of services and facilities described above necessary, to serve an Urban Residential-22 Zone are available to the project site, except sidewalks do not exist on Valley Way. Howeuer, the recommended conditions of approval require development of curbing and sidewalks. No specific residential or business development is proposed. Detailed review to determine compliance with all applicable regulations and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur at the building permit stage. Changed Conditions: Section 14.402.020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that amendments to the Zoning Map may occur when it is found that "Changes in economic, technological, or land use cond'itions has occurred to warrant modification." Changed conditions in the area of the proposal may include land use transition from low and medium density residential which is prevalent east of the subject property, to commercial retail uses immediately south and west of the subject property. Previous land use actions in the project vicinity demonstrate changed conditions. Staff Summarv: As conditioned by the reviewing agencies, the proposal demonstrates general consistency with the applicable Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is in an area in transition from lower density residential land uses to higher density land uses, primarily commercial uses. Site development will be required to comply with the development standards of the UR-22 Zone and all applicable County and State development regulations. The proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone. Attachments: A. Maps 0 Vicinity, Map o Site, Plan o Comprehensive Plan o Zoning B. Recommended Conditions of Approval C. Agency and Public Comments Fle No. ZE-13-01 Stafl Report - October 17, 2001 Public Hear(ng 8 of.8 -1 ATTACHMENT A . NIAPS VICINITY IHAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CON9PREHENSIVE Pt.AN MAP ZOPlING MAP 3-V 1 4 ~ ~ viC1911$y ~ap _ .~,i•~;,'~:~~~~un . ~ ~i .~u~u ..~►~~•r' I~ .1q11~~j y~J fy f~ _ 111) , ~ 1► 1 ~1 12 . ~ 1 N ~Sippt ' ~ h~~~ pat~{n • Nplq ' ~ ~ J4,'►~ ltyi ~ 07 , 4~4'' ~~•r•, ~(it► L~~~+r~~h•~~. ~ .~t~r~ ~ ~ "~''~'~R~''.ti~i~i~ii,Unirr•~..t~~~~;.~~~.. i r, ~ra LW cwm~ , bbu ` Rmsilf~,••, . . ~ ~ S~ ~ wtb pmgms alenreniiry 13 ~ b p - . 9 ensc ci p` ML - ~ _ r ,Q~ a 7d ~ • • - tD ~ ' ~ ams n rY ~ ~ . ~ en~re► Vat/ley Seidor Hlgh 24 ~ ' 19 t ~y I y ~ N rg n Jrm! KT ~ ' " ~ 125 { 30 I 24 t, '~p . , r• Scale :1 irich m 1667 ft irour&A 07/19/01 Vdnity AMP v.; s,p , . ~ ~ • , ~ ~j ` • -+a*~s' °s~ ~ ~ ~ . A ~-L r , , ' -~NTay p ~Nrs _ • r • ~ ~ C - ~ Z f'~F:Crt%,F_D I v~ spp~N~ COUs~~'' _ 10 . . ` ~ ~ ~!f, . • • ~ ~ " 1 i ~ ~ ► . ~ ~ ~ _ o ~ -J ~ VIStoN,0f: pLa,N1 h3t.- 1 ' 10 .1..~... l ` ti ~ ~ ~ l,r~ i ~ ~ ~ • '"'i i ` j "1 r • ' ~ L, ~ . ~1`v - r o ~ - r ' 'y ~ 1 Cb-I , • , ..v r 4 ~ /t ! ~ P~j 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ .O0'o► : 9 . A-M 43i. ag ~ . ~ h • ~ , ~ • , • ~ ~ 1 . . . P_ ~ TR A s ~ 96 . ~ ~ 1~60 ~ . < y ,•3 - ~ . ~ ~ j ~ ~ S1TE P,LAN -AISS10* oF REcoRa - , ~ -Ca pE` RS - . a .e• BQOnt . , .~,v c t I [ ~i1'F ✓ %,,,r_r n'"+,y~ •d- ~ IL a-~ ''•'~~CiREs G ~ ✓ ~ ; a _ ~909 $ yt+ h ~ r ..I... i I ~«t ~r ~ ~t~ R ~ t'1 OS S ~ G- ~ 3 735 ~ ~]..,'.'°iorti" ~E~tA ~ ~ ._~v+►n~~~ ~ iv[AS►Df ' ~ ~ sra , ` : . ~•tc SJnQ •.c V 33 t ~ 2 „ ~.~LE ~ -2 2 Q~ ~ ~a.~.. : ~t~►t~~t. -j ~ , ~ . - ~ -ro ~ ^ . , ~ ` ,i~~ i, ~r``{ ~d~ i~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.i ~ ~1~ s ~ ~ i ' ~ 43taX 7n~~ ~ T ~~'U'' 7- V ~ ',r 1 ~ '~1• ~~.lti~l~3Y LA ( "y r ~'1 Un.~ t~~~hfa ;i ~ P~~;~,s s ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ` _ • . ~ ~ ,~d,. ~,~•r- c~ oS c`~css • ~r-~ r~~ t rlrif- Q. 7E-13-01 ~ Comprehensive Land lJse Plan I - _ 71 ' I F-1 C ~ T ~ ~ SF* u Ij - ~ , ~ . - ~ ~ - - ~ , - - ~ - ~ - - - _ ~ ~ I . I ' ~ UB 411,0 I _ sm _ i ~ I ~ 1 1~~111n~~11~ I~IIt ~ Il~~t~,~'~Illlll~~ll~lf~llll 1 , $$iulJ~u~~,~;,~~y~~~ I~IIIU) oj~~u ~ • - Scale :1 inch - 833 Mrounded) 07114/01 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Subject Property wjthin IUGA. "A -^A-96 Stibject Property within UTA. Subject Property within PSSA. Subject Property witfiin ASA. ZEA 3-Q1 , Exosting Zoning . B 4:M~-C I- _ . , - - I . gic -e-a 34 ~ c = 70 u ~ c 142A nc, 78C Broadway . : , • ~ - ~ _ _ ' R-8.6 20 T g. 42 , UR- 18 ~DC - I : .5 04 ~ 8-8 50 02C . + Spri - , 7 6S 70 ~ JB,140 8C ~n UR-8.~ 6042 . 0 C - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 U S6 42 UR-8.6 60 42 &2~42 7 d6C ~ , vi~'T 189 77 J r22O ~ B-1 242 79C . _ B-2 ~ 42 , ~ UR-1 34 OOC ~43.v 0 42 2 ~ 2604 : UR-8.6 2 4 . . I I i . , . ..i" I ~ Y • - ; : B- ~ - B-S 28 87C ' ~ UR 80 42 ~~S ~ a~ - . . , B. UR-8.6 60 d2 b4 91C 13' ' ~c UR-22 C : B-8 5Q 89C B-2 27 88 14 . ( 4-8d2A 82C UR-22 03 78C 0•2 6h 4 ' B-S 811 $3 I y ' 68 a 88 ~ 88~ UR 1 4 78 , t . ~ . . ~ ~B-8 81153 ~ . ; B_8 q3 76C ~--------m~---,- i 331168 B• 14 A5 =8 9 g ~ A Z,13 ^ B~2 4 _ I-210 g 13-811~ -2 0 41'2 4 71 ~ ' . 1. 2 6~ . 8•2160 )2 0 2 I B•~ 81155 - .5 aaz ~ . . U. 2 77 U 1.6 0 2 I•2 228 65 - B-8 4~ . ~.r, - : URr22 42 92C 1~Y UR-22 B4 78C ~ ~ ; ~ R- -2 ~81107 BsC . U6LO UR•2210186C ±R-2J2 BB~ UR-8 8 60 4 B°` D42 -8. U 0042 Scale :1 Inch - 500 ft(roundec) 07/19/01 Exis6ng Zoning ATTACHNIEPDT B CONDI'fIONS OF APP6tOVAL ~ . z . . . ~ . - RECO MMEN DED CON D ITf ON S, r, :F,'- A►PPROVAL FOR ZE-1°3=01, . ; - ' . - DIVISION OF PLANNING , SPOW;EE COU~kTY _ . - . . - - - , 1. All conditons imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The zone change applies only to the parcel legally described in the Planning Division project application, file designated ZE-13-01, Assessor's tax parcel nos. 45133.1223 and 45133.1218. 3. The development of the subject reclassification site shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) Zone and.all applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 4. Spokane County Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition, area for road right-of-way. The reserved future acquisition.area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 12.5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities adjacent to Valley Way, in addition to the newly dedicated right-of-way along Velley Way. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 2.5 feet of new dedication. b. 8uilding and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured frorin the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, ground water percolations areas, drainfeld or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of- way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at tfie applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except,that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interirn uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the tirne Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. i i • ~ 5. The Division of Pianning shall prepare and record witii the Spokane County Auditor a Trt1e Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as.a result of approval of a land use action. This 1-it1e Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The litle Notice should be recorded within the, same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The T'le Notice shall generally provide as follows: °The parcel of property legally described as [from file no. ZE-13-01], is the subject of a land use action heard October 17, 2001 by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on (insert legal description),imposing -a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-13-01 is available far inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning." 6. The Division of Planning shall file with ttie Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal *om the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building pennit for any building or any use on the property described herein,,the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: (insert legal description from file no. ZE-13-01).° • ATTACHPqENT C AGENCY AND PUBL'IC COIMMENTS E i ~ • ~ To: Jim Falk (Division of Planning) CC: From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities) Date: Wednesday. October 10, 2001 Subject: ZE-0013-01 Stage: Hearing Examiner Phase: Valleyway and Sullivan, UR-3.5 to UR-22 SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated water,usage prior to the issuance of the connecfion permit in order to establish sewer fees. SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate,covee,'only those plan sheets showing sewer plans,and specifications fbr the public sewer connections and facilities fbr review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan, submittal. SS12F Sewer plans.acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit SS15A Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges,and general facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development WS01 Any water service fbr this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan fbr Spokane' County, as amended. . j , , . . d OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ElVGiNEER 1026 W 6roadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 ka , _ . - - - - - . . . , . , swwaic°"''m "ENGlNEER'S COPlDITtONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE CNANGE - - - - - . - - . . , , TO: Spo,kane Coun#y Division of Planning FROM: Division,of Engineering & Roads DATE: August 9, 2001 PROJECT: UR-3.5 TO UR-22 RECEIVED FILE ZE-0013-01 SPOK4NE COUNTY TechnicallReview Date: (08/0912001 @ 2:15) QUr's 9 2001 Planner: JIM FALK Hearing Date: @ DIVISI4N OF PL4NNONG Review Date Sponsor/Applicant: GREG 6LESSING Section Township `Range: 13-25-44 The Spokane County Engineering, Deparkment has reviewed the,above referenced appfication. The foilowing "Conditions of Approvaf" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and OrderlDecision" should the request be approved. Prior to the issuance of a buitding perrnit or at the request of 4he County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvernent District, whichever comes frst: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for right of way. Prior to the retease of a buiiding permit or use of the property as proposed: 2. Approach permits are required prior to any access to -the Spokane County, Road System. 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in'the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the April 3, 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stonnwater Management, and all other standards and laws that are applicable to this project. Final plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by 'the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering prac#ices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. CC: Applicant Greg Blessinq, . Engineez/Surveyor James A.'Stillinger Planner Jim Falk , Page 2 Engineers a8eariagDate* 8earinq 1 aRevfewDatep Review / 08/09/2001 TR ZE-0013-01 6. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Valleyway Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298'as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 10.A11 required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cos#, of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11.The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valleyway Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from the centedine, is not consistent with that specifred in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valleyway Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Valleyway Avenue. 12. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 13.The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 14.This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or site plan at this time. At such time a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation maybe required for off-site improvements. END JUL•25-01 12:14PM FROM-SCAPCA 5094?t6828 T•363 P.02102 F-230 - I d e . ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY [iie a! R POLlUT14N S a. Q ac e- CONTAOI AU1NOAgY W65T 1101 COI.tEliE, Si11TE 403 v SoOKAd6.1NA 492ot o(509) 4»•0727 Fac (S09) 077-6928 Date: ! u(. y~~- Z' 0 0 ' To: Jtm Fa% Assoclate PipnneP lmkane County Division of Pla~ npin4 1026 l#V. `Broadwa e e fpoIcanef WA 99260 From: . Ron Edgar, Chief of'fechnicel Senrices RE: SCAPCA REQUIREMENYS FOR: File Nv. ZZ-'i 3-01 Proponent ! Project Name: Zoneveclass. of 9.63 ae. . UR-3.3 t,o UR 22 - 95820 & 15690 E. VaileyaraiL. ❑ Request for Comments cn Augus4 9? 2009 iM 2:15 p.m. The following is a list of conc;er»sfosues thet may need ro be addressed fbr this project as determined from informahon received by this office. The list is pravided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not relleve the proponent from meeting all local, state, and/or federal regulations. For addifionaf information ar clarificafion, contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727. Copies of SCAPCA regulabons are availabfe for pUrchase in our offloe or can be wAewed and downtoaded frorn hrtAYAmvw~ cacca.cm,. Cons4ruC43on relatet8 re4uiteqLSM e Dust emissions during der+noliten, construetion and excavatlon project,s must be controlled. This may require the use of avater sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather cond'Rions. o Measures must be teken to avoitl the deposition of dirt and mud trem unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaoes. If cracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, mea.sures muse be taken immediafiQly to clean these surfaces. o Oebds generatad as a result of chis projeet must be dlsposed ~of by means othet than buming. e SCAPCA strangiy recommends'that a11 traveied surfaces (i.e. ingress, egress,,parking areas,, access roads, etc.) be paved and kept clean to,minimize dust emissions. o lf objectionable odors nesutt from thts project, effectlve control apparatus and measures must be taken to reduce odors to a minimum. di al re4uirem~,s o A Noticebf Construcfion and Application for Approval Is required to be submitted and approved by SCAPCA prior to the consVuctfon, installation, or establishment,of an elr pollution source. This includes emergency generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) cr higher, naturel gas headng equipment units rated at 4 MMBTU/hr or higher (input), and heaUng equipment units fred with other fuels (e.g. diesel) rated at 1 MMBTU/hr (input) or higher. ConWct SCAPCA for a NoOce of Construction applice4on. ~ o A Notice of lntent must be submitted to SCAPCA pdor to any demol'fion project or asbestos projeck An asbestos sunrey must be done by an AHERA accredited buitding inspector prior tfl the demofRion, or renovation of buildings,to detemiine if asbestos-containing material is present at the site. Contac# SCAPCA for a Noticg of Intent applicadon. U~ un,'s%S£PnNGENERALCOMMENl'S,fORMdoc ti "reo on Roq•eroo P1aer i SPOKANE RE ' DIS~`RICT ZIV Divisi E_ S P O K A~T a (D U N'I' Y . Divqs[aN oF PLanmRNG A DrV~.StoH'aF ~ PueuC,WOttKs, DcPEuttMENrr MICfiAEI. V. -NEfiDHAM, DIREGJ101t CA(tY OBLRC, DIRCCPO[t DATE: October 2, 2001 TO: fim Falk, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division FIZOM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD SUBJECT: P-roposed Zone. Change: ZE-13-01 Blessing 1. References: a) Map -of subject, scale 1" = 100', by Jaines Stillinger, dated July 13, 2001, received by this office July 24, 2001. b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, Washinp-ton and Idaho, Allan B. Griggs, 1966. c) Soil Survey, Spokane Couuty, VVashi.n,glon, Soil Coaservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. d) Spokane County, Washington, EnQineering Intenpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. e) Spokane County Rules and Regulations_ for,Sewage Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995. f) Logs of water wells in R.ange 44, 45E, Township 25N, Sections 11, 13, 14, 18, and 24. g) Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Findings: a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer. b) The project is within Critical' Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Vera Water and Power Co. W,ater supply vvill be a public, system. c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater 1V1ana'gement Area, inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service., Area recominended iu tlie '201' Study. Tb.e method of sewage disposal is. subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in 1026 W. B1tOADWAY e'SPOKAtvL, WASHINCroN 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 9 FAX: (549) 477-2243 o TDD: (509) 477•7133 ~ the area are generally suitable for us - site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not of P O K A N E C O~.I N'I' Y d) ~iSr~eo~t~~NN NG relatively flat area east of S~uBi ooa, dE~d~ o~~oSfpV~al~le~~way Avenue. Local drg~g~..t~cAxY oBCRC, otkEcroR e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service -as Garrison gravelly loam witli 0% to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible contamination of groundwater. This' soil would be clas"sified as a Type N. ~ Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These .geological structures generally yield moderate to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in Ihe area referenced in sectiaA 1 g shows, they are from 81' to 487' deep and have static water levels varying from 47' to 120' belov►r the surface. The Vera Water and Power Co. has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent. 3. Required (maadatory) Conditions If Approved: a) Sewage clisposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane Caunty. b) Water service sha11 be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. d) A public sewer sy,stem will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval: a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County c: Sponsor: Carey Blessing 9 S. Washington, Ste. 701 Spokane WA 99201 1026, W. BKOADWAY • SPOK.INE, WASHI,NG'1'ON 99260-0220 i'HONE: (509) 477-7200 o FAX: (509) 477-2243 o TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ 1 An ~o SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99260 Spowf C%KI'Y 509477-3675 , RECEIVED Recommended Conc~.i.tions RECEIVED sPOKANE couNrY - - sPOIcaNE couNrr 2001 File Number: ZE-13-01 .3 0 zone Change to UR-22 DIVISION OF PLANNtldG DIllISItsaemm=v ON 4F PLANNING The applicant should contact the_Division of Build.ing and Code Enforcement°at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admi.nistered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development coacerns include addressi.ng, fire apparatus access roads, fu-e,hycirant flow, approved water systems, building aGCessibiliry, construction type, occupancy classification, e$isting exterior wall protection and energy code requirements. e commaaof vooft e twdW= Pe~l ap"maa ot/ae/ao 1 ~ @ • ~ , I o o , i • e o o D o e _ o _ ~ • o ' 1, J I a~• I I JI~ I I ~ + I To: Spokane County Division of Planning _ Planner: DEANNA VVALTER From: Greg Baldwin - ~ ' ~ . Subject: VE-0013-01 (FR YD SEATBACK 45'°CODE 65' RESIDENCE W/GARAGE) Applicant: JEROME,S & JOAN A DONEN Date: September 25, 2001 RE: Variance.Review' 08-17-2001 Hearing 10/17/2001 Technical Review We propose no changes to our conditions of approval submitted to your office on August 16, 2001. 1 S P O K A N E C (:3 U ZV' T Y . DMSIOYV OC P[ANNiNG A 17PASIUN OT THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARI'MENT MICf iAEi. V. NE@DE{AM, ~DutEC'rpR ~ GnRY OBERG, DIRECroit ~SEP 19 2001 MEEMoRAlvnuM sPoMNE couNnr ENQiNEER TO: S -k,an-e, oa ~ ~oM-ieneeri~g& Y,~ ~ - - ~~L ~lYlm ~ 4 Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; John Hohman Spokane County Division of Utilities; Ji.m Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda. Sims Spokane Regional Health Distiict; Steve Holderby Spokane Couaty Division of Bu.ilding & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer Fire District No. ] Vera Irrigation District No. 15 FROM: Jim Falk, Associate Plan.ner' m DATE: September 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing on October 17, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. FII,E NO: ZE-13-01 BRIEF DESCRIP'TION: ; Zone Reclassificarion fxom Llrban Residential-3.5 (UR 3.5) to Urban Resideatial-22 (UR-22) on 1.63 acres of land for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 ((JR-22) zone. PARCEL NO: 45133.1223, 45133.121,8 APPLICANT: Greg Blessing Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review,and return any comments to me by October 3, 2001. wc Attachments: 'Notice of Fublic Hearing 1026 W. BROADWAY e SI'OKANC, WASH[NGTON 99260-0220 . PHONE: ,(509), 477=7200 e FAX: (509) 477-2243 o TDD: (509) 47I-7133 0 / . NOTICE OF PUBLIC RF-ARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EX R _ TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet , YOU ARE HEREBY NO'I'IFIED 'I'HAT A PUBI,IC HEARING WILL BE HELID ON TTHE LAND LTSE APPL'ICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: Anplication: File No. ZE-13-01; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residentia1-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on 1.63 acres of land for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (1JIZ-22) zone. Parcet No(s): 45133.1218, 45133.1223 Hearing YDate and Time: October 17, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. Pluce: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Owner: Anderson Trust, PO Box 607, I.iberty Lake, WA 99019 Applicant: Greg,Blessing, 9 S. Washington, Suite 701, Spokane, WA 99201; 509/747-7777 Address and Location: Generally located 450 feet east of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Va11ey Way and fronts on the south side of Valley Way i.n the NQV % of the SW of Secdon 13, Township 25 N,, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA Compreheasive Plan: Urban • Existing Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR 3.5) Emvironmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsigaificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Planning, as the lead agency on September 28, 2001. The comment- period ends October 15, 2001. RelatedPerinits: Division of Planning Staff: Jim Falk, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7228 HEARING EXANIINEIt PItOCEIDURES Hearing Process and Apgeals: The hearing will be conducted'under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the'Heazing Exami.ner's decision will be based on the record established before the Heari.ng Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environinental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: _A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing-. The Staff Report and application file may be inspec#ed at the Spokane County Division of Planning, V Floor Permit Center, Public Works Build.ing, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents urill be made available for the cost of repro,duction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning,1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Jim Fallc, File No. ZE-13-01. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3'd Floor, Public Works Building,1026 W. Broadway, Spokatie, WA 99260-0245. • 1 a 1 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NYJMBEYZ: ZE-13-01 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on 1.63 acres of land for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) zone. PARCEL NO.: 45133.1218, 45133.1223 HEARING DATE AND TIlVIE: October 17, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. APPLICAIVT: Greg Blessing, 9 S. Washington, Ste. 701, Spokane, WA 99201; 509/747-7777 I,OCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located 450 feet east of the intersection of Sullivan Road and Valley Way and &onts on the south side of Valley Way in the NW '/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sectioo 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DMSION OF PLANNIING DETFIUVIINA1'ION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable signif cant adverse impact on the environment: This decision was made aRer review of a completed environmental checklist and other informatioa on fite with the lead ageacy. This inforniation is available to the public on request. This,DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at feast 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this- DNS_must be submitted no later t6sn 5:00 p.m., October 15, 2001, if they are inteaded to alter t6e DNS. AU comments 96ould be sent to t6e cpatact person Usted below. RESPONSI6LE OMCIAL: By: Jim Falk, Associate Planner Spokaae County Division of Planaing 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokanes WA 9926 20 (509 47 -7 • DA'~E ISSUED: September 28, 2001 SIGI~1ATiJRE: Q01~~1~TT5 R~iC'sARDING AL OON WII.~OOME AT 'INE HFARM. APPEAL OF T'.HIS DETERMINATION, aft~er it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, lst Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing afthe decision to approve or disapprove the project This appeal must be written and ttie appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: l. WA State Department _ lo Ol ia ~ o " - 'g~s~tTf~Ct~' "~Ygubreftln- ` ~ g~lhardBz7v ST9 3. Spokane County Divisioa of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman 4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 5. Spokane County Storinwater Utility; Brenda.Sims 6. Spokane Regional Heafth District; Steve Holderby 7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry 8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer 9. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 10. Vera Irrigation District No. 15 a ~ - , . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY EIVGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509~77-3600 Fax (509)477-2243 ~6 . - , - - - - - "ENGINEER'S COidDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE CHAIVGE TO: Spokane Courity Division of Planning, FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: August 9, 2001 PROJECT: UR-3.5 TO UR-22 FILE ZE-0013-01 TechnicaVReview Date: (08/09/2001 @ 2:15) Pianner. JIIVI FALK Hearing Date: @ Review Date Sponsor/Applicant: GREG BLESSING Section Township Range: 13-25-44 Ttie Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "C_onditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning, for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to the issuance of a building perinit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjun,ction with a County Road ProjecdRoad Improvemen4 District, whichever comes first: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valleyway Avenue for right of way. Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: 2. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System: 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall. submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the April 3, 2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other standards and laws that are,applicable to this project. Final plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineers acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking -stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The construction of the roadway 'improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. CC: Apglicant_ ~Greg Blessiaq Enqineer%Surveyor James W. Stillinger Planner Jim Falk Page 2 Engineers aHeazinqDatep Bearinq / vReviewDate» Reviewo/ 08/04/20d1 TR zE-0013-01 6. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement o,f Valleyway Avenue, which is adjacent to 'the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphait along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must, also be constructed. 7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the reiease of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valleyway Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 20 feet, measured from the centerline, is not consistent with that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedicatiori, a stdp of property 12.5 feet in width along the Valleyway Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at~the time when arterial improvements are made to Valleyway Avenue. 12. uThe applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effectin'g the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume- no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities.", "The applicant 'should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to mak& aITangements for any necessary work." 13. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 14. This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or site plan at this time. At such time a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation maybe required for off-site improvements. END ~ . . Kimba,ll, Sandy From: Hohmen, John Sent: Thursday, August 02, 200,1 12•33 PM To: Engelhard, Scott; Baldwin, Greg Cc: Kimball, Sandy; Falk, Jim; Littie, Colleen; Callan, Cindy; Sims, Brenda; Peterschmidt, Lucy Subject: ZE-13-01 Blessing 8-2-01 I have reviewed this proposal and have the following, condition of approval: A Professional Engineer, licensed' in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to'the April 3,.2001 Edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the cuRent edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other standards and laws that,are applicable to this project. Final plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction'or building permit. The application is technically complete. Thanks, John V. Hohman, P.E. 1 PAGE 1 . . • 13:53:03 25 JUL 2001 Roa3## Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 05110 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 FANCHER RD U 19 PAVED 24 VALLEYWAY AV .150 UPRR CROSSING U 19 PAVED 24 .160 LAKE RD U 19 PAVED 24 .250 EASTERN RD U 19 PAVED 24 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 DYER RD (START) U 19 PAVED 24 05111 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 PARK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY AV .230 ELLA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .360 DICK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .480 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 20 .530 MESA LN (PVT RD) U 17 PAVED 20 .610 BESSIE RD U 17 PAVED 20 .740 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 20 .860 MARGUERITE RD U 17 PAVED 18 .920 HUTCHINS4N RD (END) U 17 PAVED 18 .990 ARGONNE RD U 17 PAVED 40 1.050 MULLAN RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.120 WILLOW RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.240 LOCUST RD U 17 PAVED 20 - .380 FARR RD U 19 PAVED 14 VALLEYWP.Y A'v (END) 1.490 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 14 05112 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 WALNUT R.D U 19 PAVED 20 VALLEYWAY AV .060 HERALD RD U 17 PAVED 20 .190 FELTS RD U 17 PAVED 20 .310 RAYMOND RD U 17 PAVED 20 .440 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20 .510 VAN MARTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 .690 PIERCE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 ~ .790 SKIPWORTH RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 .940 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 20 1.010 BATES RD (START) U 17 PAVED 30 1.190 UNION RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 1.450 SR 27 (PINES) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.840 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.950 MCDONALD RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.110 MCCABE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.200 BLAKE RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.310 MAYHEW ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.360 MAMER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. VALLEYWAY AV (END) 2.470 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. : 0 51.13 t,TALLEYWAY AV ( START ) .000 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LI GHT B I TUM . ~ VALLEYWAY AV .110 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ .160 BANNEN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. ~ .170 BANNEN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. .250 BEST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BI'I'UM. 20 .260 BEST RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .300 REES R.D (START) U 17 LIGHT BIT'UM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV (END) .500 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 05114 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV .120 BURNS RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .150 BURNS RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 24 .250 PROGRESS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .390 SOMMER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .770 MOORE RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .840 SONORA RD(NONESTABLI U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 i.000 CONKLIN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.150 SHAMROCK (NONESTABLI U 17 L?GHT EITUM. 20 , VALLEYWAY AV ( END ) 1. 5,0 0 FLOR:A . RD , U 17 L I GHT B I TUM . 2,0 0,5115 VALI:,EYWAY =AV ( START . 0.0 0 HARMONY RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 4.0 PAGE 2 . . • • 13: 5 3: 0 4 2 5 JiTL 2001 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Deacriptio Road Log Info.......... VALLEYWAY AV .10,0 MCMILLAN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 . 13,0 MCM'ILL,AN CT ( START ) U 19 PAVED 40 VAL'LEYWAY AV ( END ) .320 HODGE'S RD U 19 PAVED 40 0'5116 VALLEYWAY AV (LIBERT .000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE,R 09, PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY- AV A20 MCKINZI E DR (END,) R 09 PAVED 40 .080 GARRY DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40 .190 MAIN AV (LIBERTY LAK R 09 PAVED 40 .270 MI-TCHELL CT(LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40 .330 M I TCHELi, DR ( END ) R 0_9 PAVED 40 .390 MOLTER RD R0 9 L? GHT- BITUM. 22 1.050 DL:INBA.RTON LN (-PVT RD R 09 L I GHT B I TUM . 22 VALLEYWAY AV ('END ) 1. 2.8 0 LAKESIDE RD END ) R 09 LIGHT BI TUM . 20 0-5117 VALLEYWAY CT (START) .000 LABERRY DR U 19 PAVED 37 VALLEYWAY CT (END) .100 EAST END OF ROAD U 1*9 PAVED 37 8 Records Processed - - ~ . , S F O It A 1-4 E 9, C O U IV' T Y" . 01ViSION OF PLAiVNING A UMSION OF THE PUBI.IC WpRFS DiJ'AR7MFNl' MICHAE1_ V. NEEDHnM, D{RFCMR GAR1' OBr-KG, DIRECfOR MEMORANDIJM DA'I'E: July 24, 2001 TO: oads:-.~ Division of Engineering -and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - lnformation ~Management; Jim Red . Division of Utilities -Stormwater Utility;_Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health Districr -Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of BuiIding & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer Spokane Transit Authority, Gordon Howell Central Valley School District No. 356 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Vera Iriigation District No. 15 WA State Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell Office of Historic Preservation, Teresa Brum FROM: Jim Falk, Associate Planner e~;t• SiJBJECT: ZE-13=01; Zone Rectassification of 1.63 acres from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR 3.5)to Urban Resid"ential-22 (UR-22) for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (LJR-22) -zone. TECBNICAL REVIEW 1VgEETING Anmnst 9z2001 at 2:15 P.M. Public Works BuildiaQ lst Floor Joell Wands Conference Room Please review the above apptication and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIE`N MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to_me for the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW EORMS_will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Pianning file. Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7200. NOTE: The Division of Pianaing is circulating t6e SEPA Checklist for comments. This will be t6e only time you wilt be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist for this project. wc Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plaa, Vicinity Map, SEPA Checkiist Copy without enclosures: Greg Blessing, 9 S. Washington, Ste. 701, Spokane, WA 99201 Anderson 1'rust, PO Box 607, Liberty, Lake, WA 99019 1026 W. B[tOAOWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINCTON 99260-0220 PHbNE: (549) 477-?200' o-FAX:,(509) 471-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 0` r . , , Spokane Couaty Division of Planning Technicsl.lteview Meeting Meeting Date and Time:August 9, 2001 @ 2:15 p.m. Project File No.: ZE-13-01 Pro,ject Location: 15620 and 15610 E. Valleyway, generally located south of and adjacent to Valleyway and east of Sullivan Road in t~ie southwest'/ of Section 13, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokaae County, Washingtori. Comprehensive Plan: ~Urban Project Description: ZoAe Reclassification of 1.63 acres,from Urban Residential- 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for those uses allowed in the LJrban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. Parcel No(s): 45133,.1223 45133.1218 Owner: Anderson Trust PO Box 607 L- iberty Lake, WA 99019 Applicant: Greg Blessing 9 S. 'Washington, Suite 701 Spokaae, WA 99201 509-747-7777 Project Planner: Jim Falk, Associate'Planner ,t . . . , , . l SPOKANE COUNTY ~DIVISION OF F~LANNING RECE!ilED SFQK/~f~E COU~UTY ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION AIL ,;L" i_ = 1U,u1 PART I DIYISiOtl OF PLANNiNG ~y~,, ,,~g .,,p°~,r•--,,~~~f ~-F'~.~ • ~~rji I`,~Q Q dy4~~ ~O l~ ~ ~~ji{~;'1~` A ~=y~^ i' ~j~ r1~3 y~ .~,c~~1~ "'w !F~.~'.,"-~1 'i a.~ :l~S;~'i`•ti+~: i` ?3~i•~~~~, }A~e~P~(Ip) r }N~yr` 2 Appiicant- Mailing Address L&A S 14 %JY1-~''1_0 t T 6 '7 0 1 City State LJP~ Zip Code ~J2.Z,- ~ Phone 71ta 7-DI ~ (Work) ~41 S s f )0.) (Home) Fax Legal Owner A F-a5~m ~ QLA-S- T_ ~ I . Mailing Address ~ ~Cj 0 7 ' CitY " t,41ef.E State Zip Code _ (FF 0 o 7 Phone (Work) (Home) Fax Agent, if different from applicant C- fA Mailing Address ' CitY State ~ Zip Code Phone (Work) _ r- (Home) Fax Project/proposal sfte area (acres or sq. -7 ff 00 U sLT Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft.) V Assessors parcel #(s) of project/proposal <i 502--.) , lZZ ~ ~t'~~ I~tjg Assessor's parcel #(s)of adjacent area owned or oontrolled ~ .Street address of ProPosal o S (o LAi E)isting zone classfication(s) and date established ~•l~ • 3~ S ~ Existing use of property C-L ~ Proposed zoning. L A.(Z Comprehensive plan cetegory L-4- (Z School district Water ~ urve or ~ ~ P Y - ~ Frre district Proposed use of property: Single family dwellings Duplexes Muldfamily dwellings Manufactured homes ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use { ) Other ( ) - Describe ,c Q6eL~rrs List previous planntng division acdons involving this properly $A0AJV- E Z 13 0 1 - . ' , . . ZONE RECtASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 2 of 5 ,a ~ - a S~ 1FI~A i ~+0 j ~ ` ~ e~sao,~.-~... w..,c,1.m,r.~ +..y• Address and Location of proposal 0 9141 ~ ~ 5 0~' ARY . ~ r~ ~ S~ I 1 ~ ~,n~ ~ ~ 0 ..4- 'Ui S 4c Section 13 Township ~ s Range ~ Name of pubiiclpdvate road(s) providing access ~!J~ ~ ~ Width of property fronting on public/private road ~ AMC, Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arteriai? Yes No Name(s) of arterial roads 9. V A w ~ C Oi + ~ Legal description, of property for each zone reclassffication proposed ~11223~ 1/~~~ V 100 vrT Or- F, 22a.~-F T- OPP UO2A f5 z a fi Existing zone(s) to proposed zone(s) CAP- r the following described property: ~ (Attach legal description stamped by land sunreyor or provide below.) T' 2ZZ 1 ~ 112 Z ~ Q T a ~~P...4. v d-wti vti lio 3 Q Ql~ ~ 4.4-1 t. l~ ~ Sc. c, t-i o). 2%5- N,? ~ 44 E,~ M,. I 3~ ( ~ 6.~ ~j, '~~,e,~S h , `+c Tn ~ _ . 4~~~ : . q.1. .S~ If you do not hold title to the property, what is vour interest in it? y ~ ~ ~a,~' ~ rt tAr~' 1Nhat ar+e the changed condftions of,tfie area whlch you feel make this proposel warrant d ..-tr`' AN AOeW ~A ce;~- J r . , > . , . , ZONE RECL-ASSIFICATION APPUCATION PAGE 3 of 5 What factors support the zone reclassification? A onsistencY witti the Comprehensive Pian C wt ~C ~ k%5 W-vrk (Ae er--jr ~ Compfiance with purpose,and intent of zoning ~ l~ ~S i .~:Q~ bd~ ~ - . Description of changed conditions of the area that you feel make this proposai warranted r.rvtmz2 Gc1pA Nzi>.6- L-.~Wcj cx- vlw" el-~ - What impact- will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent, properties? 1~.~. JA LiEAD -P=7 e.km--xvctD4Q-- ~ -QSRQ91.-Vv~ N%5P~ Wc.' Pc79&-~i _ 'T', - v u a ~~a ► I ~~l ~s~ I~~~- ~ ' What measures do ou propose to mitigate your, proposaf's impact on surnounding land use? CZ2.) ~ PART II FIRE 1YiARSHALL / FIRE DISTRICT RCW 36.70 B requites eariy coordinaflon and information A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WiTHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. B. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE MADE TO MEET THE DISTRIC S FiRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS? C. SEE AITACHED LEITER DATED: D. REQUIRED FIRE FIOW (galions per minute): ! have d the proposal and have advlsed the appllcanf of ~@ Flre Dlstrict requirements. SIGNAI`URE TiTI.E OATE ~ ZONE RECLASSIFiCATION APPLICATION PAGE 4 of 5 WATER PURVEYOR RCW 36.70 8 requires eariy coordination and information A. THIS PROPOSAL- IS 1MTHlN WATER .DlSTRlCT: ~j7-?_ A B SATI'SFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER ANO FIRE FLOW HAVE BEEN ~ MAOE AS FOLLOWS: A WATER SYSTEM PLAN MUST BE PREPARED: YES, NO REQUIREMENTS: P~r-& 4• ` a~ ~ ~ ~ C. SEE ATTACHED L ER DATED: - i have revlewed t oposal and have advised- the applicant of fhe District requirements. SIGNA~ GRE Tll'LE DATE SPOKANE REGIONAL NEALTH DISTRICT RCW 36.70 8, requires early,cAOrdination and information ,A," PRELIMINARY SCUSSION HA TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLICATION MUST _ {NCLUDE: B. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED: After a prelfminary revlew of fhe proposal,l have advised dTe applicant of some of the- Spokane,Reglonal, Health requiremenfs. A corriplefe and detailed review will be prnvided after the application is sub%rthe h will result In a complefe lfst of nequinements and conditions r~egarolin - Health prr~vislon posaL / ~W T x~. Z NATU E- TITLE O' TE . ~ - SEWER PURVEYOR (City of Spokane or L'berty Lake) RC 70 8- requires eariy caordina~on and infoRnation A PRELIiVIINARI( OISCUSSION H AKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLIC - MUST - INCLUDE: B. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED: After a pr~liminary revlew of the propo , have advised the lcant of some of the Sewer n~qulrBments A vomplei detailed review wi11 be provi aRer the applicetion . is submitted, which wfl! nesult in a efe Ilst of r~equiriamenfs and cvnditlons re ing Sewer provlslons for the proposal. - SIGNATURE TRLE ' ~ ~ , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAQE5of5 SURVEYOR VERIFICATION I, the undersi ned, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the information requested for the zoning map and w' n legal description Signed Date 7 -13 -'0 / Addre D. ~ aY.. 7o o Phone ofd - 7 7 L-Z2_33 City ~.a~ cQ P r~ State 1 cQ. Zip 8 3 83S PARTIII SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS,OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION i, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above responses are, made truthfully and to the best of my knowiedge. I further swear or affirm that I am the,owner of record of -the area proposed for the previousiy identified land use action, or, if not the ow r, attached 'herewith is written permission from the owner authorizing my actions on his/i~er behalf. 1 ~ Signed ~ Date IV Address P. O . 48o%r (oo7 Phone (~5 ccr ) g ci # - , .J~_6-z' City E-n.'rm L-A7~ E Lc.~~ q 1~iO 1 S State Lk.,A_ Zip L I v I Signature k of Applicant or Representative Date State of Washington ) ) ss: County of Spokane ) Signed and swom or affirmed before me on this day of X-3~. , 2000, by Notary Seal Notary Public 'in and for the State of Washington residing at 'S pe sh c„~, . Lc/P . My appointment expires o ~ 4) y _ PART IV _ TO 8E COMPLETED BY THE DtVISION OF PLANNIN(3 ~ Date submitted 7- File number ,Zzz; -f3 Oate aocepted 6y _ ~ ~ r►~i ~ ~ Total fees ~ 99-~ Receipt number ~ ~ , . . v - r, _vF<<!'E FJ : i K~:ti= f"Utj$qTY • r . _ ' ! lf ~l 1 Cf~.'i~~~1;~•~ c~!~ ~~c_,'`:~lt~~l~~►~ IM _ y~ ~ ~ ~ Y_1.~ N 7~,,«. ~ V . {0 ~ ~ ~E~. _E~ . . . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN CE SE`CTION 11.10.230-1- , ZEvwml3==fl~l . u • V SEPA ENVIRorrvINTAL CHEcKIIsT WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURAOSE OF CNECILLIS7 The Scate Environmental Palicy Acc (SEPA), chapcer 43.21C KCW, requires zIl gove: nmer,c:ll aaencies to consider the environmental impaccs oE a proposa] before makin; decisions. An enVI :onrr.ental_ impact stacement (EIS) must be prepared for a11 proposals wich probable sianificant adverse ii:-ipac;s on the qu-alicy of che environment. The purpose of this checklist is to prc~vide information to hela you and the agency idencify impact from your proposal (3nd to reduce or avoid impacts from che proposal, if it can be done) and to help the aaeacy decide whecher an EIS is required. - DISTR UCTIOzVS F4R APPUCAIVTS This environmental checklist asks you co describe soine basic information about you: proposal. Governmencal asencies Lse this checklist co decermine whether the environmeatal impacts or your proposal are significant, requirin; preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, n ith che mos: precise information knawn, ar give the best descripcion you can. You must 3.nswer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to ans-wer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need co hire expen.s. If you really do not know the anszver, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply°. Complete answers to the quesuons nozv may aroid unnecessary delays later. Sume yuesLions asK abouc governmenLa,u regulations, suc as zonina, snoreline, anci ian(imark ~ . desi~nations. t1ns~-e: Lhese questior. if you ca.~. If you nave pro ems, c"nP gove: nrnent-9; a~e:~cjes can assist ycu. The checklisc quescions apply to all paru af your proposal, even iE you plan to do them ove: a pe: iod of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmenta.l effeccs. ?he agency to which you submic this checklist ma,; ask you to exglain your answers or provide addiuonal information reasonably related to determining if the: e mati- be significa.nc ad4erse impact. USE OF CNF_CKLIS t' FOR NfJ*I'ROrECT AROPOSALS: Complete this checl;.Iist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be znsn e; ed "does not apply." IiN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR N0N-PROJECT AC'nONS D). For non-projecc actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "appLcant," and "propercy or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectivelr. SpoE;snc Ent :-.in:..e::-d'. Or~c.-.sncc Checkl:sc T. / A. BACKGROUND F1LE/PROJECI' NO. 1. Name -oE proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of appli'c1nc: ~ 3. tlddress and phon'e numbet of applicant and contacL person: ~ ~ ~ • ~ rt r~`~' 4. Date checklist prepa:,ed: . ° 5. Agenc;r requcst;ng cl;ecl:lisz: u ~!Ik1►~t,s ~ ~ - ~k'"a`~`~-~~ i.,l.~` ~ 6. ' Pcopased timing o.r schedule (including pha'sin;, if applicable): 94IS1tlt Ea:=iranmen:.-.? Or,:~i~_:,ce Che:'.clis; • ~ A. Br1CItGROUND (conrinued). 7, a. Do ,you have any plans for future additions, eYpansion, or funher activiry relared to or,cannected tvith this proposal? If y,es, explain. r c ~ c:N1e- v 0o ~c-~;, e- T~ s 'b. Do you, own or have apuons on land nearb.y,or adjacent to, this proposal? If yes, explain. IN S. Lisc any environmentsl information you knotv about that has been prepared, or will be pre7ared, d1irectly , relaced to_a,this proposal. O C..CZ. pOo e, GrC~ C . ~ _ d 9. Do you know R; heche; applicacioris are pending for governmental approvals of ocher proposajs directly affeccing, the property covered by your proposal? If yes, eYplain. % ~ ~~-'7 10. List any governrnent approva.ls or pe:mics thac will be needed for your proposal, if known. IA"Ao 'Vt I .MOr2- - _ , ' ec IL~-~-0 _ S~okane En~-iron-m-•nczl 0;~:=.z-:cc Chcc'clisz Pave 4 of? i ✓ ~ + a A. BACKGROUND (concinuee): 11. Give a brief, complece description of ,your proposal; including the proposed uses and the size of the ,projecc and site. 'There are several quesiions later in tliis checklist that ask you to describe certain aspers af ybur proposal. You do„not need ta repeat those anstven on this po;e. C5 ; S tpt aCZA ~gxz, t L,,.~~ ~ c,o ~o ~ 1 , 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise locazion of your proposed project, includin~ a street address, if any, and section, to~vnship and range, if knoR=n. If a.proposal would occur ove: a ran;e_of area, provide the range or boundaries of che site(s). Provide a legal description, °site plan, viciniry- mao, and copographic map, if reasonably available. VVhile you should subm,it any plans required by the a;ency, you, are not required to duplicare maps or detailed plazu submicced with_any permu't aoplication related to this,checklist. . E~~~ -k 0% 1 - , ~ . kN V.SQ A aT ~ -1 ~~T is 13. Does the proposed action lie wichin-the Aquifer Ser.sicive Area (ASA)y The General Sewe- Se: ti:ice Area? The Pribrizy Sewe: Service. Area? The Ciry of Spokane% .(See: Spokane CoLnry's ASA Over)a}• 2one Azlas for boundaries}. s- . • Evaluation Far Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAiNT B. ENViRONYiENTAL ELEtiiEN'i S: 1. E ax'rH a. General d'escripcion 'of the'site (circle orie : flac, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, ocher: i-p'~ _ b. What is the steepest slope, on, the site (approxirnace percent slvpe')? N(~r _3 cl, 0 c. Whac- general types o_'f soils are found ;on che site (for example, c) ay, sand, graveI, peat, muck)'? If you know the classificauon of agricultural soils, specify them and noce any p rime f a rml and. _P %-4 - 3. Are there surface indicacions or history of unstable soils in che,imrmed.iaie vica.nity? If so, describe. I - r) - I7escribe ,the ,purpose, type and appro:tim~te'quantities oE any filling or gradin, proposed. Indicate source of -fill. ~ S _,es-) 4~ ~e e- "k . Coul'd er-osion occur as~a result of clearin;, construction,,or use? If so, Pene:i.lv describe. - ~ _ ~ So ~Lq ~ :)okane C)=;:~:::^ce C~:?cklist a ~ ~ • ~ • Evaluation For Ae .=ency Use Only B. EWIRONM'EYI'AL ELE:vIENT5 (Continued): g. About what percent of che site will be code:-ed with impervious surfaces after. project constg 'on (for exam le, asphalt or build.inas)? h. Proposed measures, to .reduce or concrol erosion, or ocher im ~cts to,the eanh, if an,y: AIR a. %Yi~hat type of ernissions to the air would resulr ffom rhe proposal (i.e.; dusc, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke)'during construczion and-when the project is• eompleted? If any, enerZ describe and give appro:umate quantities, if kno~; n. Sj,j 7D~A r ` t5e A~- 1S t,rl s . ASSOC- _ NlLA_ ~ N i t- ~ . 3. Are there any of;-site sources oi emissions or odor thar riiay affict your,proposal? If so, generally describe. - . Pro ose ~measures to-~~ ce or control em,issions or~ ther-impacts To air, if any: THQQ ~ - - t4 A~ ILVS7 ~ `t~ Eq-C )n~tn.• F-~t•er~~~.,..... l ~1_!' - - ~t . • 1 1 . . ~ . ~ 'Evaluation For Agenc,y Use Only B. EiNVIRONi'vIEiNTAL EL-F.IVIEYTS '(Confinued): 3. WATER, a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in,,che immediate viciniry of che site (includ'ing ,yeaz--round and seasonal streams, saltwater-, lakes, poncls, jvetlands)? If y,es, describe , tvpe -and pcovide n'ames. If,appropriate,,statc n+nat st*enm or-river it,t7ows into. v_ ' Will che projecL require any work over, in, or adjacent tv (within 200 feet) the describ d~ acers? If y --es, please describe and,actach availaEile pl:.ns. - - c a- o 3) E"stimace che amounc of fill and' dredge material thac would be placed in or removed . from surfa'ce water or wetlands and indicate che area of the site that Would be affected. Indic \,e the s ur-of fill material. _Q - 4) Will the proposal require surface w3cer withdra,cvals or divers:ons? Gi-ve a general de %Blion, pur,pose, and appro-umace quanticies if known. ~ S) Does the- proposal lie 'v~;ithin a 1G0-year floodplain? If so, note location on _the site pian. noka::e Fn•.•trlr.-nt•^-;I C~--•----~., r~.~.-~•i.~. - J . . • • ' • Evaluation For Agency Use-On ly B. E' INVIRONVIEYTAL ELE:vIEVT5 (Continued): 6} Does the proposal involve a.ny discharges of waste maEerials to surface waters? If so, describe the t~ e of ~vaste and, ancicipated volume of aischarge. ta. Ground: 1) WiIl groundnrater be withdrawn, or will wacer be discharged to ground watz*? Give general descripcion, purpose, and approximate q~ tities if~o~ - - ~ ~ 0~ L. 1 ~ ~ - 2) Describe waste material Lhac will be discharged into ch'e ground from sepcic,Laaks,or , ocher-sanitary• n;aste treatment facilit}r. Describe the general-size of the system, the number of houses to be served if applicable), or the number of person he svstem(s) are expeczed to serve. L 57 J~ ~O s~ ~ NOD ~ 3) Describe any syscems, ocher than those designed Eor,the disposal of szaitary n aste, installed for che purpose of discharging flui d s be low the ground suriace (including sysrems such, ss those for,the disposal of scorm water or drainage from'floor dra.ins). Describe the type of syscem, che amount of material to be di'sposed of through the system and tlie tvpes of macerials likely to be disposed of (includin;, materials, zvhich may enter the syste:n inadvercently through spills or as a result of fue fightirg f ( s activities). e t~ l~l~ r ~ AU, _ Qr-W-~ ~ A~~ ~W A-6- EM6;L- t- ~~WaAa-~Ts ~ Co~ e CPL" ?&-Vb4Yt,% .-I i,• . • . Q . , , 'E%aluation For Aeency Use Onlv B. EiWIRONMENT?►L-ELE:-vILNTS (Continucd): 4) Wi11 any chemicils'(especially organic solvents or peEroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage twks? If so, what types and,quantities of materials wi11 be stored? o "--1\^--~ ~ f,c'G ~~0►~`~ ~ - 5) Whac proteccive measures wiU be taken to ensure that leal:s or spills of any Aemic;3ls - stored or used on sice will noc be allowec!-to percolace co~ groundwater (Ehis includes measur s to kee-- chemicals out of disposal rystems described in 36(2) and:3'b(3)? O- - ~ c. Water-Runoff (including scorm w3ter) ' . 1) Describe the source of rurioff '(including storm wace:) and mechod oi collecrio d n an disposal, if any (include quanticies, if known). Where will this water flow? `Vill this water flow inro och'er waters? If so, describe. ,SADLILA~.a ~V V~U>--J ---WNYVO 074ek 4tXIM LALL - Will any chemiczls be stored, handled or used on che sice in a location nhere a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwacer or to a storsri water disposal sy stem ' discharging rface or groundwater? ~ _ . ~ . Could tvasre mac •':}ls enter ground or-surf3ce'~vycers= If so, gene:ally describe. ~o:-:~ne En~;ironm:•r.t`al ~r- ; ~ r~~~'~1~-- - ~ ~ . . , . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EWIRONMENTr1I. ~S (Contiaued): d. Proposeci measures to reduce or concrol surface; ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the pro,posed action lies witbin the Aouifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relaung tv facilities concerning Seccioa~s 36(i), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of~chis checklisc). t Kc ~y C-~^ ~ 4. PL AiNTs a. Check or circle rypes of veeetation .found on the sice: . deeiduous tree: er, aple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fi cedar, 9 other ✓ shrubs t/ grass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plaats: cactail, butcercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, , ocher l ' water plants: R ater lily, eelgrass, milfoil, oth'er ~~~~4 ~et other rYPes of 1 egetauon '~~A~ ASS~-1►`~~ ~ v. 1What kind ar;ZAsmaLni of tiegetazion will bc rcmavcd `-akc RD LS r A C-S PLY- -or c. List th eatened or endangered species known to,be on near the site. '--~:o 0 V-J~ - ~ - - i. Proposed lzndscaping, use of native plancs,,or othcr measur,es co pr ser~e o: enhance vegecation on the-site, if ar:v: -~5 ~ _ Pn~ ~o PDs ~ ~ ....t c... _ - • : , , . ~ , ► Evaluation For Agency Use Onlv B. ENVIRtJNN1UNTAL ELfsv1E1TS (Continued): 5. AvltitAt:s a. Circle any birdsr and animals w hich have been obse.-:•ed on or ne:.r the siEe or, are kno~rn to be on or near the sice: birds: ha~vk, heron, e3g1e, ong~iir m ybther: amma ls: deer, bear= e l k, er, ot her: - f;sh: ,b~ss, -salmon, trouc, herrin~,_ s}~ellfish, ocher: b. List any threatened or endange:ed species knoNn to be on or near rhe site. ,c. I's the,siiz p3r,c of a mioration route? If so, explain 0TD t-x.A !R.. d. Proposed m asures t~reserve or enhance wildlife, if any: E~ERGY A~tD -i~I:~TL'RkL RFSOURCES 1. What kinds of ener,.o-,-,- (electric, natural gas, oil, ~vood stove, solar) wi11 be used co meet the cornpleced project',s energy needs? Describe whether ic tvill be used for heating, manufacturina, etc. 1= I_~GV (~t c, (.p ~ S - - . \Vould„you; proje~c a:iect_the pocential use oF'solar,energy bv adjacenE proFe:-~ies? If so, ,generallti• clesc ' z. :)oka nc• F:.•rt rn; r~. r1. r-~ .t•.. - i ~ ~ ` • ' ' Evaluation For Aaency Use t~nlv EiN1VIR4N1ZEMr1L ELE:v1Et'YTS (Continued): c. What kinds of energy conservacion features are included in the plans of this proposal?' List oc er proposed measures co reduce or conErol energy impatu, if any: ~ (S T. EN-vtROlvMENITAL HF..3I.Tf-i a. Are there any,environmental health' hazards, includin; exposure co to.,cic chemicals, risk of fire and,explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, thaL could occur as a resslt of ttus proposal? If so, describe. ~ 1) Describz special emergenry services that might be required. .549r' t.~ S Lr~ % 1n4_ .12^ tw 1 1~1) P~ ~ f\kl a L.c . Proposed measu:,es to reduce or control envi: or.r.:~ :EX' • health hazards, if any: . 1`goise 1) Wha.c rypes of noise eacis in the area which may-affecr your projea (for exam Fle: traffic, equipmenc, operacion, oche:)? ~AA 60"~- tt~ _ - ~►P~~P~~~ ~ htc.~_S l ~ ( - `Su~ CAf25 e TC-. 2) Whac tvpes and levels of noise would be, creaced 6y or associated tvitb the project on a short-term or a lon; terin basis (for example: Eraffic, construction, ope: ation, ocher)? Indicate whac hours noise would' come fro che siie~ ~ . ~ r U N~° ~ Q &Z ~ S. . C,_•-_~-- ~r~ t• - , , , , • , , Evaluation For Aaency Use Only B. EN1VIROMN1ENTaiL ELLMEi1TS (Contioued): 3) Proposed mezsurf ~ Lo educe. or concrol_noise impacu, if any: S. L?~VD AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use oE the site and adj~Cenc propercies? _ OAA~ C:19-4r! ~ b. Has the site been,used for-agriCulture? If sv, describe. - d - - - Describe a.ny struccures an the sice. i. Will any sttuctu~s be demolished? IE so, which? ~ What is tlle current zonin classification.oE tlie site? S' ~ ~ . 5 l~► ~S ~ )a'.-:a::_ En, ironmzr.: il n-::,-*,~~: , r'~~,.~.~:~; • - ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ` Evaluation For AQency Use Only B. E?IVIRONMEYTAL ELEMFiTS (Continued): . ~ Whac is,the currenc Comprehensive Plan desionauon of the site? g. If a licable, whac is the cwrent shoreline marer proo*am designation of the sice? h. Has any parc of _the sice- been `classified as an "environmencall}'r sensitive" arm) - If so, specify. ' - _ C) L.A. . Appro:cimateiy ho,cv many people would reside or work in ihe completed project.3 TO I ~ d +-i2J- S O Tr-) MAA"Y40'L" 1-t (-e 5c54 U:~ . A proximacely hon man,y people would che compleLed project di'lace? ~Z-L-Vf '',--i,,Z c j ( co Proposed -measures co avoid or reduce displacemenc impaccs, iE any: Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existin; and projected land uses and p.s, it anb : G S z q- '1U Qt.,jn T 5 Y r__..__--- 1. ,.1 6 Evaluation For A sency Use On ly B. E~1'VIROIVME'j-1"I'A.L FZ.F-MEVTS (Continued): 9. HOUSING a. `/Approximately hon many units would be provided, if any? Indicace R•h"ether high, middle, or lo-w-income housing. J. ~ t~ 'p►Q~~~ M~~ OP ~ ~ i~i`'ll~. ~ . b. Ap,proximately how many units; if any, ovould be eliminatecL% Indicate nh'echer high, middle,,or Iow-income housinc,. _ 14-6 Proposed measurzs co reduce or control housin' irapacts, if any: What is the callest height of any proposed struccure(s), noc including antennas; tvhat is the principal eti-terior-builduig inateri~l(s) proposed? .4mh C, f J ~J C,Q~4:5 b~ im C..a r-A 'i~ Lp , - - . Whac vie~•s~in the im.-~ediate viciniry would be alte~r~e~ S sructed? Mtn~c~rt- Proposed meas,ures, to reduce or concrol aestheti imp~cu, if n. ~ - LA_ ~ - CQ~,~ ZY , ~ S ~ - - _ ~ lokanL Envir,onrn'enc: 2 C~'--• J_---~ ~"'ra~'~1;<: • • - - Evaluation, For Aeency Use Only B. EWIRONME3VTAL ELE:vSEN'I'S (ContiQUCd): 11. L-IGHT AtvD GLAR.E a. What type of light orglare tvill the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ' ~~`1 • ~`~~~-~g i ~ LAk r1.k' Lt c. yl-t ~ "1_)-A5_ t~ ' - r b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safetv haz.:.rd or inrerfere wich • . . V1eN$! s 4 Ot, ic> . ~ - c. What emsting off-site sources of light or glare ay, ~ect,your proposa]? c~~ s~ I .Proposzd me:isures to 1 educe or. conccol light aud glare impacv, iE ativ: 13. RECREA-ti oN i. What designated and informal recreacional opportunities are in the immediate' vi }'nity? Would the proposed project displace any'e.XJsting recreacional uses? lf so, describe. ~ -Io!{ane EnvirAnrnienc.:l _ o Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EtWIRO,NibIEN'I'r1L ELLMEiYTS (Continued): Proposed measures,to reduce or control unpaczs,on reueation, including,recreacion opportunities to be provided by the project or applicanc, ii any: - - . 13. HISTURIC AND CU, LNRAL PRESERIi ATION . a: Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, n3tional, state, or local preservation registers, l;nown co be on or ne.Xc to the site? If so, geizerally describe. -,v~ . ~ b. Generally describe any landmar~ks or evidence of historic, archaeolo;ical', scientific or eul ural importance known co be on or e:rt.to e sitt: _ D &J NT- ~ 'bt,4,& Propcsea, m~ u:cs •0 rcduce o~ concr`ol iinpa~ts, if, a.-~y: 14. TR.AVSPORT MON 1. Identify public streecs and hi;hways serving the site and describe proposed access co ch'e existina st,ree: system. Show on sice plans, if any. 4e IR C~'A` ~ v Is site currentlv sened by public transit? If noc, whac. is the appro~cimace dis:~ce ~ to the iiearest ~ fansit stop? 0 ~fc ~ - K - ;pokane Environrtier..al 0-ai:^.:::cz! Checkhs: P1oa 14 ot ?.i Evaluation For Acency tlse Onlv B. ENVIRONMEwAL E1.E,'V1EV'I'S (Conrinued): c. How many, parking spaces would che corupleted project have? How many would the projerc eliminate? ~ d. Vtlill the proposal require any new roads -vr szreecs, or improvements to ex,isting roads or streets, nat including driveways? If so, generally,describe (inditate wheLher public or privace). - ~ ~..I? C, ~1 sc c.~,~ C'~~~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ w VA. S~ . ~ , Will the project use (or, occur in tlie immediate viciniry 0'0 water, rail, or air transportarion? If so, general]y describe. . How rnany vehicula.r trips per day•wou)d be. generaced h.y rhe complerPCl, projer.L? IE known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. so ~ '~~(Z~ ~►~v e~'- ~~.,1~`t►~ c0 1 Proposed measures to reduce or control csaulsporcation impaccs, if any: . PUBLIC SERVZC-ES Would the projecc resulc in. an increased need for public services (for'e-xarnple: fire protection, police proteccion, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. C, Q-d`l-5~ =41i A1- L- C~~ L ~ ,,ane ' n%•ir,o,nmencal Qru:r-i;:re Chec!clist . . • ' • - • t Evaluation For Aacncy llse Only B. EIWIRONMEYI'AL ELE;I~IEYTS (Continued): b. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol direcr imoacts on public services, if an . Pu , 1 ovJ N ~ C~ "/~p lel'**6. UTILITTES a ~ a a. Circle uti~' ' rentl ac the site: elec~ricic , natural g wate , e service elepho s:~nitary sew~r septic rystem, ocher. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the uriliry provid.ing che service, and the general consrrucuon activicies on the sice or in the unmediate vicinity which mighc be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury chac the above respoases are made truthfLlly and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand thac, sbould there be any willful misrepresentauon or willtul lack of full d.isclosure on my part, the aaencv may withdraw any deternunation of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this ehecklist. Datc: (D C0 Proponenc: •Ts c Proponcnt: '10"t ~ (Plea.se type or print) (Sioanature) Address: i~• /~4')4r Ce O~ City, S[ate, Zip: ~ J-C ry x L Phone: Person compietin~ rhe form. CR,!To 1~55 Datc• ~ 10 ~ Q y' v( C ~ Phone: 045 ~ J C a-3 hq7 ? I ~ j =pokane Erz•ironmc•:::.;. {'~:r'sc:~-cP C'hecnlist n ♦ ( ~ i i ~ • i ~ FO-R STAFF USE ONLY Staff Meinber(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on,-chis staff'review of the environmencal checklist and other pertinenc'in'formacion, the staff: A. Concludes thac there are no probable-significznt adverse impacu and recommends a deter.minacion of, nonsigni~ficance (DNS}. B. Concludes thac ,probable signific3.nc adverse eaviroamenia! ;mpacts do exist for the current ~ proposal and recommends,a micigaced determination of nonsignificance q,ith coriditions (ylD C. Concludes that there are probable significanc adverse environmental impacu and r,ecommends a decerminacion of significance (DS). R.EFER TOTEE`SCHEDULE FOR F1LNG FEE . ~ Spokane Enti•ironmen:al O:rdir.znce Checklisc N;r 21 of 2 1 A I • ~ ~ . r i ' SPOI~:ANE COUNTY D(ViSfON OF EtiGINE-ERING .1ND ROADS .A DIVISTOti nE= 'rHF. PI'FiI.I(' WORKS DEP.tiRTMF:'VT AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES EN'GINEER'S AGREEMENT hUryiBER el / 3 D ^ / T'fiis ai!reenient between Spokane County and Z5 i -)r, L;. , (name oT p,.«~m, Ah'.)\C~ 1wLIL1t in illr prc~jeLt is ~ ~i.c. owncr, ag ht, etc. ~ is entered into this day of J.> 20 C~l This agreement is applicable to the project k- n o w n as: / Ce !U ~ l/~C. 6 4- ~ vir~,,a~ . i. ~oject aaaress or ruename or -ptac name pior rne numoer) T-liat che individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in tle above described property or project agree to the follo%vinL,: 1. Rc:i►ubursc: Spokane County for project review and inspection tees as speci(iecl in Cliapter 9.14 ofi ihe Spokane County Code. Tlie fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, including any expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account, must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for tiling. If a project is approved and/or filed with a baIance still owine, the unpaid balance shall be paid %ti•ithin 30 daYs of the invoice date. Thr: undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billin~~ as specitied above. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of tfle invoice date will be considered delinquent. If any oucscanding balance on the account fvr this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date rnay result in legal action or the initiation of other collection procedures, including referral to a collectian agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the Counry for the collc:ction of ot-erdue accounts. 4 The nuonthlv billing should te sent to: N:>ML• ' ,-t"rI'ENTfOti: D F ,2 COMPANY: ADDRESS: P• D . 40(37 CITY, STATE: L1 LIL•v4 T[P CODE: cici c> r S PHONE o5 0PHONE # 2: i FAx C oor, E-Niail I uiiderstand chat failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the praject or other liossihlc sanctions. D If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the projec[ owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, chen written authorization from the Sponsor specific y authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreeruent is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: Q (PRINT NAME) RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS G. ,t`.igrcef:•: doc 4 ''_ll(►t 1026 W Broac1wov Ave Spokane VVA 99260-0170 (509) 477-3600 F4Y: (509) 477-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166 , ti ~r • ~SPOKANE COLTNTY Dt VISIoN. ()F BuII;D,IlNG AND LODE IENFORCEI1dE1v'I'N 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE o SPOR;ANE, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675 ~ . . . J C SffE INFoRMA'noN - - Ptto.~CIT EW-oRMAnoN ) Site Address: 15616E VtkI,LEYWAY AVE Projert Numbcr: 01005858 Inv: 1 tssue Dntc: ' VERADALE, WA 99037 permitUse: ZE-13-01 Parcel Number: 45133.1223 S'iib,dlvision: iJNKNOWN Appllcant: A.NDERSON, DENNIS P &CFiRiSTINF Block: tut: PO 607 Zoning: UNK Unknow% LIBIIZTY LAICE, WA 99019 Phone: (509) $91-0892 Owner: ANDERSON, DENNIS P& CHItIS1INE Contact: ANDERSON, DENNIS P 8t CHRISTINE - PO 607 Address: PO 607 LIAERTyLqKE, wA 99019 Phone: (509) 891-0892 LIBERTY LAKE, WA 99019 S'stbacks - Frant: Lcft: Ri~;ht: Itear: Tnspector. DAN HOWARA Watcr Dlst: Groap Name: Project NAme: e_ C _ - PERMI'I'(S) - - ~ ZOne G'ItQ71ge Contrndor: License N: , IC-,~b'N,,~,(3.I~d~kS~~W~= $200.00 ENViRONMENTAi. RCVIEW 575.00 REZONE:RS,UR7,UR12.UR22 2 S1,461.00 P_RE-APP CO .*ERI:NCE $58.00 UTI=S REVIBW $100.00 ' • Total Petmit Fee: $1,894.00 C PAYMFIVT StTMMARY Page 1 of l NOTES ) PAYMENT Processed By: Buck, Marti Prflnted By: WENDEL, GLORIA Tran Date Receigig Pavment Amt 7/18/01 5358 $1,894.00 TotelFees AmountPaid AmountOwing $1,894:00 $1,894.00, $0.00 r w` • Spokane County Public Work.s Depay°tment Divison of'Building & C'ode Enforcement Receipt Receipi Nuinber. 5356 Custonrer 1Vuinber Projects Full Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Atntr InuAnr! Owiirg, PAID P»r1 01005858 1 $.1;894.00 :$1,1;8941.00_- ~$,1=,894.00 $1„894.00 SZ Total: '$1,,894:00°, $;1;894.00, _ $1,894.00 Miscellaneoas Items Total PAID: $1,894.00 Tender • - - - - - - - - J!pe__ I,Clteck A`cct Balance CCNbr;, _ - - , Ep, Date 7'ENDERED . - - - - • - _i i Tr-, , : 32.00 1,862.00 Total TENDERED: 1,894.00 Over / (Short) $0.00 Change $0.00 lYotes: Tian Date /Tfine: 7118/01 10:53:59 AM By: GWendel Logon User: gwendel SYatlon: GWENDEL Overrlde By: Printed: '7/18/OI l0: 54: Ol AM Poge ) oj 1 - Z. _ O ~•1C~~~~ ap .di ~ ~ ~(1 ~ti~~ - . ,~~;►,~r+► ~ ~ruc+ ~►"~1JI.f111..~UL..11 U..I,.l~~^ l~tl: ~1~ • `~h►~° 1 2 07 . - - r 4~~ '~t•~''tl'It ' r'~. , _ Lu ~'1t•~r, t ~ ~ i'~.~„ • - 7 • ~ . ° ~ a ` k1~' ~ ~y • ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 13 P~tg~ ~em$ntarY . t If IV ~ qreensc ~ ' - iL 41 a 30 of 14, ee, n ~~►,►1~+ + lb ~ ~Itil~~ +Ilj ~ ~ ~ Oy%Wv". ♦ ~ ~.J~,~~-~ ~Le1~~~`' _ ~J ~ c~' ~ K19b ' ~ ~ ~ ~ A of"s n y e~~neY sontor 24 ~ - ~ • 25 30 rg n Ju~ , 2~ ~/~g/Ol V`dratY IvtaP Sale itx► ..1667 h tr'°unc~'~d'f :1 ~ W-0 , L C. ' ~ i'+ 1 . . ; . . ~ rNrRy S t i . L1..6 . ift 2. _ ~ - - i'~ I ► ° RECElVED - ~ ~ SPOKA ~ ~ ~ . hfE GOUNTV ~ I . ; ~ vo JUL, N1NG DIVISiON ~ OF F~ I I ` ~ 2 Z • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `'c' - i S ' c%i ~ I JO , • , . ~ ~ ; l I,~~ I ~ ~ + ' ~ ~ ~ `'i.~.,J ~I ' Y10, ~ • ` ~ a. ~ ' t ~ ~ ~ ~ • - - Sw 4 . ~ ~ ~ r 00 ~ ~ , ' ~ ~c. ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ► ~ ~ a . ~ . N. 431. aa' . . i . ' _ ~ • ` ~ ' ~.i. ` . ~ a ~ TR A TR B ' ~ ; v , S•~9E) ~ , . . z~ . ~ ..y:....~ ALAL . . _ SITE QLAN c~ OF RECORD il~ ~ . -CA DERS AAS~;i ~ ilm ~9 1 • f ~ •~r~1~M , . _'sn~tss~~rt~_ `,~L, ` eooa~ N,~ a ~ OtsE. yaet' ~ ~N[t t OES-it 0(SMt ~ A = 6909 8 N ~ r . R • ~ 3 , . t ¢ t q•.~ ~nARRp~~ry-0 . „a~~ pWGf R~~NACRES ~ Cr~OSS ~ • . , ~ ; tK ~ !-j.-p~-~ v~ I 7353 ~M IV A ~ 1, 2 2 Z2 ~ 3 3 I. 3 a .~-3 ~ ._~u+ir{..~ ~r~as~of ~OVN p R~ - ~ ~ ~3 ~~SFflAGV/ i ~ ,o W 3•te _ p ~ ~'p N~M A;OALE e~ I ~,.f ~ A 'c~~~'tti5 .If11 {~vl. - t ~ _!tl tivt y1 ~ r ~ df K 3►4, ~ r[. II. . r _ o. iN(T ~ U~1~•~j L4 ~ ~ ~ 1.~ R ! ~ , ♦ . 9 ~ % ► . ~ 1 P@,.f,B S(f 0 13ax 700 ~rmPoSlro AcccSS ~ b ~J16 t.5 --,yi'' ~t GntotVVaY. 5'!i!p Ll_ r ' r~ ' ti':j.'[(E'il (.~i'ttif', RC~i3~1J ~l~%•'?`i A ~ l~ ~>y- ~f,'' •J_~~ , I,, _ , -7_) y : . Parcel: 45133.1218 ' Owner. ANDERSON, DENNIS P& CHRISTINE L CoOwner; , Owner Address PO BOX 801 LIBERTY L'AKE WA 99019-0607 Braaaliray Site Address 15620 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE - r Legal Description kl ~ • _ VERA E122FT OF N1/2 B28 E~] U) 0~.~:. - Cl~ _ •J` 's ~ - c_ ~ , . . . . ~ iT ~ --r-r-r-r`~ in71TTn-1E01]-1 1--I I 1 , Notice: This is nat a legal document. Data depicted 'on this map fs general & subject to conslant revisron. It is Intended for reference use only. legal documenis should be obtained from tfie appropriate agency. . Parcel: 45133.1223 • Owner: ANDERSON, DENNIS P- &,CHRISTINE CoOwner: UJ_i_U L ~ . Owner-Address i . PO 647 LIBERTY LAKE WA 99019 USA Broaaway ~ Site Address 15610 E VALLEYWAY AVE VERADALE ~ f Legal oescription ~ I ki VERA W100FT OF E222FT OF N1/2 828 o 4 ~ , n Vall , ~ ~ r- ° -l ° - ' _ _ N, - ~ . _ - - • 1 - , ~ , ~ ~ - r~ ~ ' - - and NoGce: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject lo wnstant revision. it is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be o'btained hom Ihe appropriate agency. i I P -r ~ ' •~d Q agGa~, ~:s . ,pi ~ 4~ fo~yp GQp - aB8 QP rre'' ?_r qaA ~`U~:~~~ ~A ---ppgADwA' Me.a~ x ~ • .7• I ~ ~ ~ U o.v G~I ~I 9 j ~ ~a, 7~ 6K •O 'A' i A' ` h , r ! ~1 G 1 S ~1~ •f ..t.^r ~ ' ~ , -il- ~ ~ ; ~~I , • 11 is i6 ~I 7 1~ s~ t~^ Ayi 11: ~ 2 17 ~ I r,,•t~ y 1 +i~ i ~ ~~t~•c• ~ C ~n ~ fWlhW n ~ b ~ ~ r W,•r ~ ,~L . ~ „ ~ b us.o~2 ~ ~,y ~ z z ~ ' 5~,J~ ~ + • , +~1 I n~ ~ ' r~~! L ~j,~t~`~ i: ~ d ~ ~ ~7. 1~~ 1~ ~ M s~~• ~ 0 f T 2 2 4 L(;t 1c rO p II ~:.sa L~ p1~ q 1 $ lLs. , t4 a ~w I i~ wu.~ ~ a ~ ' S • g r~ r ~ ' n t ''1 s C i 4~'.ti ~ g 0 ~e ti i I 4 2 6 2 5 Y ~ 9 s 27 , Z „ c: n 09 ► i' r 9fE H?~POS2 MAIN AYE, SEE NO.I, 2092-60I .eo.:r.~ ~ -_-_-~-_-•-----~.....~_1_--------------~^- 9 l, •p ~i 0 , so ro' P C q r 47 B 9 io ll l2 _U -G" (1, I 4 I 5 29 30 32 oo~,P• Ao aR ~o Nv~"969ti4G Wi A' : C- o.~ tiQl~f 0 T~• 9~ ~U I? Q ~ a ' No. G SIL "~D.7, (}l spa+cus ~/,1 i. ~1 . LewAYI 6''A6Uc. -T 11~ ~ 30~►vl~Pi~UE -aaP~e _1 - E OAD No.231 t~. ~ TG► Jd9"47 fZ ~ SPOFtAPvE GOUNT'( ~ ~ z3 4' cR P ~ 3 r~c ~ a~ ~ ~A Revtseo . _ _ _ - • ~ : ♦ . y ♦'t. ~ - • : ~ ~+'i ~ _ ~ ~ l~ ' . - , ~ r t ~ ~•~K ~ d. t'~ ~ ~s•t ~ - ~ ♦ ic- 'i • Al' • ~ ~r~ .~~I► n r{ '~'~{`~f~~~~~~j►"~t~<. _ M 1 • r1 t j',~ 7•i~ •r / / . ~ ' ` F ' ` . t I ~ . . ' • + ; ~ ` ~ ~ ~ q ~ ; . ,W •r f II 1 1~ _ . . ".y ~ .r ~ • 4V ~ w ~~'J'-t~ r~, , ~ - ~ ~ti-. . - . ,.~y ~ ~ a/..e ♦ , . ,t ~ ~74~ •"lb6 -AS " . ' ~ ~iY' ~ ~ ' ~ ,~4 ~,,ry• M ' s ~ S'!r. ' ' : ..r .L• ~ E:~ ' : • i ~ V~ ~a 1 d f N~1\ s~ ,~y~ ~ ! ~h ' ~ ' t * YI : ~ ' f yMr V ~ . F'. j~ • a ^7.. ' ' .y • `-_11 ~ _.i `5~t _ ~Jr. ~ ~•j ~ t ♦ ~ ' ,i ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ i► + .'Y: { ~ • , ~ Y ~1'~~ 'u f • . ~ ~ • ~ I ~ i~Y ' ~ ♦ t ~•t ti )Q_ _,1 ~i i 3~4.. 1•`:~~ : St r !9~! k 4 ~ . ' - ~ • ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ i +~e~k~ t t.~`. + { } . 4 ~ t ' r" / :1 z ~ . ~ '',r . ~~r - rs ~y ~ . ~ Z''i Y',~• „r+,`4t".• r~, Y y 1 's. ~ .Fr~"ix"~i ~ f ~ ~ ; . tp~~ ~s fi ~ Y~r~,.' ~ ~ ' l ~'r~ J ~...5~, ~ ,~Y ~ . ~a ~ ~.~1. , • ~t~ ~ y. 1~i'~ ! . . ~ ? 1 ,~.a P~• S. ~ 1, ' N, ~ ~ ` + a a ~ ~ t ,r' k~• , • ` ' ~a 4ir- • I~ J M~!• ~ ~ 1• i Y , ••~S' ~ ~ w ~ ( r\ aer~' ~ y{ . ~t_ , s' •1 ~ ,t ~ r. J • li. , t % - i1 - ' ~ I S, x~ • ~ ~ • r • L C,f ,~a!~ +r 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ` r • 4 -r. - ~.a~+ .i' ~ • . ~ _ y r S~ a f • ' • ~ 1 ~ ~ Mr M,,,,,•_ r. . -s ; ~ ~ , r , : ~ • ; . • . r . ~ , ~ . ~ ;..+t'r' .x+~-~'t':•. - ~.~.s~ ; f_ ~ ~ , { r