The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-0021-02 ` RECEIVED a~~OKA~~ ~~~NTY SPoKAvE COUIVTY xEARING Ex:AMINER MaR 5 2003 Dt1ltSlON OF PLANNINCi RE Zone Reclassification from UR-3 5 Zone ) FINDINGS OF FACT, to UR-7 Zone, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Applicant Walls Construction Corp ) AND Y)ECISION File No ZE-21-02 ) 1 Tlus matter came on for pubhc heanrig on February 19, 2003, the Heanng Examlrier, after review of the zone reclassification application and the entue record, and finduig good cause therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision I FINI)INGS OF FACT 1 The application requests a rezone of 2 42 acres of land from the Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) Zone, to the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone, to develop uses which are allowed in the RU-7 Zone 2 The site is located north of and adjolmng Broadway Avenue, and approxunately 250 feet west of Locust Road and approximately 270 feet east of Mullan Road in the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Townslup 25N, Range 55, EWM The site address is 9317 East Broadway Avenue 3 The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel number 45172 1215 and 1216 4 The site is legally descnbed as a platted lot of record whuch is descnbed as "Opporturuty B62 N1/2 of W1/2 of W1/2 except N165FT" and "Opportunity PT of B2 except N165 FT of E1/2 of W1/2 & STP E of and adj 7W of Walnut Add in the County of Spokane, Washington " 5 The applicant is Walls Construction Company 137 South Howe Street Spokane Washington, 99212 The site owner is Travis CampbelU21 st Century LLC P O Box 14006 Spokane, Washington 99214 6 Tbe Heanng Exarruner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearing Examiner Ordinance (County Resolution No 96-0171) and the County Heanng Exarruner Rules of Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294) 7 The Heanng Exa.nuner conducted a site visit on February 20, 2003, and held a public heanng on the proposed rezone on February 19, 2003 The requirements for notice of public heanng were met HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 1 e a ~ 8 The following persons testified at the public heanng David Jensen, Division of Planning A1 Walls 1026 West Broadway Walls Construction Company Spokane, WA 99260 137 Soutb Howe Street Spokane, WA 99221 9 The County Division of Planrung issued a Deternunation of Nonsignificance under SEPA for the project on February 4, 2003 10 The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County GMA Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan, Phase I Development Regulations, County Resolution Nos 2-0037 and 2-0470, County Zoning Code, County Code, other applicable development regulations, and pnor land use decisions in the vicinrty 11 The record includes the documents in the project file at the time of the pubhc heanng, the documents and testunony subnutted at the public heanng, and the items taken notice of by the Heanng Examiner 12 The site is `L" shaped It contains approxunately 2 42 acres and is largely undeveloped except for a house and a detached accessory structure 13 The project is located on Broadway Avenue, wluch is a paved four-lane Pnncipal Urban Artenal according to the County's Artenal Road Plan Surrounding uses include single-family residences to the north, east, south, and west of the site 14 An application for the project was submitted to the Division of Planning on December 16, 2002, and a techrucal review meeting was held on January 2, 2003 The Determination of Completeness was issued on January 3, 2003, and the Notice of Applicahon was mailed on December 23, 2002, with a 14-day comment penod ending on January 6, 2003 f 15 The adoption of Phase 1 Development Regulations to unplement the County's new Growth Management Comprehensive Plan on January 15, 2002, did not change the existing zoning of the subject site It is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as being within the Low Density Residential Category There have been no issues related to concurrency which would prevent the approval of this zone change 16 The applicant has submitted no detailed site plan, but seeks only to rezone the property from UR-3 5 to UR-7 to allow uses which are allowed in the UR-7 Zone 17 The site and area are located within the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay Zone, and the Public Transit Benefit Area defined in the zorung code Intensive commercial development and zorung are found a short distance to the west along Mullan Road The site will be provided with a high level of public services, including public sewer and water, and close proximity to public transit HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 2 c 18 The County received no letters from the pubhc in response to the Notice of Application or Notice of Public Heanng, and no members of the publlc testified at the heanng on this matter 19 A memorandum was received from the City/County Histonc Preservation Off ce about the single-family house on the site The memo said that the office would only support the zvne change if the house was saVed, because it had some hlstonc sigruficance The house is not on any histonc register, however, and the County does not have regulations in piace which could be used to prohibit the demolition of the structure Whether the hvuse will be retained ar demolished unll have to be the decision of the landowner i 20 The Planning Staff, in its report, analyzed the consistency of the proposal with the GMA Comprehensive Plan, the UR-7 Zone, and other appllcable development regulations, and found the proposal to be in compliance with those land use controls The Hearing Examiner concurs with that analysis and hereby adopts and incorporates the same by reference as findtngs of fact herein 21 The project will have to comply with all requ2rements of the UR-7 Zone and other applicable development regulations when development permlts are s4ught by the applicant There was no evidence that the zone change will have any significant adverse impacts on the envlronment or will be incompatible wrth neighbonng land uses 22 Condrtions have changed in the area slnce the zoning of the site Changes include the adoption of the Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan and Phase I Development Regulations, increased population grourth in Spokane Valley, increased traffic an the adjacent Artenal, Broadway Avenue, and the extension of pubhc sewer to the area Based on the above findin s of fact the Heann Examiner enters the followin g a g g 11 COIVCLUSIONS OF LAW 1 The proposed rezone conforms to the GMA Comprehensive Plan 2 The proposed rezone, as condrtioned, bears a substantial relationshlp, and will not be detnmental to the public health, safety and welfare 3 A change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant the proposed rezone, as condrtioned A substantial change of circumstances has occurred zn t.he area since the sXte wa.s last zoned 4 The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Polzcy Act and the Caunty's Local Envuonmental Ordinance have been met The proposed rezone from UR-3 S to UR.-7, as eonditioned, will not have a significant, probable adverse unpact on the environment HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 3 i 5 The proposed rezone, as conditioned, meets the cntena established by Waslungton case law for approving a rezone, and the cntena established in paragraphs 14 402 020 (1)(2) of the County Zoning Code for amending the County official zoning map 6 Approval of the land use application is appropnate under section 11 of the County Heanng Examiner Urdinance, adopted by County Resolution Na 96-0171 I~I DECISgQ)N Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a rezone from the Urban Residential-3 5 (LTR-3 5) Zone to the Urban Resldential-7 (LJR-7) Zone for development consistent with the UR-7 Zone, is hereby approued, subject to the conditions of approval of the public agencies as stated below Failure to comply with the conditions of tus approval may result in revocation of tlus approval by the Heanrig Examiner This apprvval does not waive the applicant's obligation to comply with all other requirements of other agencies with junsdiction SPO%ANE COUN'I'Y DIVISION OF PLANNING 1 All conditrons unposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property heirs assigns and successors 2 The Zone Reclasslfication applies to the following real property "{Qpporhuuty B62 N1/2 of W1/2 of W1l2 exc N165ft" and Opporturuty PT of B2 exc N165ft of, E1l2 of W1/2 & stp E of & adj 7 W of Walnut Add 3 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-7 (CTR-7) zane and all applicable Chapters of the Spokane County Zonin.g Code as amended 4 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buzlding and Code Enforcement at the earliest g possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admirustered/enforced as authonzed by the 5tate Building Code Act Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing extenor wall protection and ener,gy code requirements 5 Site plan review is admuustrative and shall be conducted pnor to the issuance of any building permits to determine performance compliance with the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone and all applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code as amended 6 Any future division of the parcel shall demonstrate compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance 7 The Division of Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject ta a vanety of special conditions HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Fage 4 imposed as a result of approval of a land use action Tlus Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded withui the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planrung The Title Notice shall generally apply as follows The parcel of property legally descnbed as a platted lot of record which is descnbed as Opportunity B62 N1/2 of W1/2 of W1/2 except N165FT" and `Opporturuty PT of B2 except N165 FT of E1/2 of W1/2 & STP E of and adj 7W of Walnut Add in the County of Spokane, Waslungton " is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Heanng Examuler on February 19, 2003, imposing a vanety of special development conditions File No ZE-21-02 is available for inspechon and cop}nng in the Spokane County Division of Planning SPOKANE COUNTY 1)IVISBON OF ENGINEERING ANI) ItOADS Pnor to release of a bwlding pernut or use of the property as proposed 1 Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system 2 A Professional Engineer (P E), hcensed in the State of Washington, shall submit road and storm drainage construction plans and a draulage report that conform to the versions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stonnwater Management, and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws that are in effect at the time of the plan subnuttal or at the tune of the development permit application(s) The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the County Enguleer's acceptance pnor to release of any Gradulg, Bullding or Right-of-Way Permrts 3 A parkuig plan and traffic circulation plan shall be subnutted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parkulg stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineenng practices 4 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 5 No vnprovements are required to Broadway Avenue because CRP 1409 and ULID 02-01 constructed these improvements NOTE A five-year moratonum on pavement cut is in effect for this segment of Broadway Avenue due to the recent paving through ULID #02-01 6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge Construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertairung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane County Resolution No 1-0298, as amended, and are applicable to tlus proposal HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 5 ~ 8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed nght of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work withul the public road nght of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9 All requued construction witlun the existing or proposed public nght of way is to be completed pnor to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Englneer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer 10 The applicant is advised that there may exist uhlities either underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work 11 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards 12 This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or srte plan at tlus time At such time a srte plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic uiformation for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure The applicant is advised that mitigation may be requued for off-site unprovements NOTE When a specific development proposal or site plan is submitted, these plans will be reviewed for Transportahon Concurrency in accordance with the Phase 1 Development Regulations SPOKANE COgTNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1 As per the Spokane County Zoning Code Phase One Development Regulations a wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed A sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit histoncal and/or estimated water usage pnor to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees 2 The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under separate cover," only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the pubhc sewer connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit histoncal and/or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal 3 Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of the sewer connectlon permit 4 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 6 N SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1 The sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coordulated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existuig public water supply when approved by the Reglonal Engineer (Spokane), State Deparhnent of Health The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prolubited 4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project DATED tlus 4th day of March 2003 SPOI{ANE COZJNTY HEARING ]EXAIVIINEIt PRO TE1VI ~ , Greg' Smith NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION ANI) NOTICE OF 12IGHT T'O APPEAY.. Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0632, as modified by County Resolution No 1-0700, the decision of the Heanng Examiner on an applicahon for a zone reclassification is final and conclusive unless witlun fourteen (14) calendar days from the Examiner's wntten decision, a party of record aggneved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Waslungton This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant and by regular mail to other parties of record, on March 4, 2003 THE APPEAg. CLOSING DATE IS MARCH 18, 2003 The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file dunng the appeal period with the Office of the Heanng Exanuner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Waslungton, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be inspected dunng normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County Pursuant to RCW 36 70B 130, affected property owners may request a change m valuatlon for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-21-02 Page 7 I Pro)cCl Sta[us ACtiEI~IGINEERVS ~`~VlE'`~V SHEET ~'c As [3uilt Plans Received Rezone File ZE-0021-02 '02 Road Plans Approved Companion Files: New Ruad Standards 5- I 5-95 Mylar #f: Related Files: Ncaring: 4s1 V-3 0 Building Dept: Technical Review: 71/02/2003 1: 15 Harvard Rd Plan Eng Speeial Fees Preliminary Review: Type: Large Lot Bldg. Syuare Feet Date Reccived: 12/19/2002 Na. Lots: No. Acres: 2.42 Project Name UR-3.5 TO LiR-7 APT 6 PLEX Site Address N. f3ROADWAY, S. CATALDO, W. LOGUST, E. MULLAN, BROADWAY E. 9317 Applicant Conditions Mailed: Flood Zone No Ahone Dist School Dist 363 A1 Walls Firc Disi 01 Rangc.-Township-Sectiun: 44 - 25 - 17 PARCEL(S): (tirst 20) WALLS CONSTRUCTION CORP Water Source Public 45172.1215 45172.1216 137 S. Howc St Sewer Sourcc SPOKANE, WA 99212- Phone (509) 534-3058 I Uw'ncr Surveyor 2157 CENTURY LLC Charles E Simpsun 818 W. Riverside Av . 530 SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC PO BOX 14006 909 N. Argonne Rd SPOKANE, WA 99201-0910 SPOKANL, WA 99212-2789 Phone (509) 981-0999 Phonc (509) 926-1322 Fux (509) 926-1323 BuiIdin~ 477-3675 /Plannin` 477-72U0 /E:n~ineer 47'-3G00 Contact jj/J' DAVID JENSEN Contact En, GREG BALUWIN Datc Submitted DescriFti.,Qg Initials Eng Need Technically Complc:te Eng Need 1-(arvurd Rd Mitigation Eng Need Urainage Plans Eng Need Traffic Analysis Eng Need Other Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed Eng Agree Priority Fees Received 12/1612002 Eng Prelim Plat Fees Completed Copy to Accounting Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Cumpleted - or Needs to be signed Design Deviation Dates (In-0ut) I3ond quanties calculated Hearing Date Decision App . Den Cond Appld BCC Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appid Court Appcaled to Court Decision App Den Cond Appld Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy) / / Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Sandy) ENGINEEYt'S I~EVIEW SHEET Project Staws Active As [3uilt Plans Received Rezone File ZF,-0021-02 "02 Ruad Plans Approvcd Companion riles: New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Related Files: Hcaring: IIuilding Dept: Technical Review: 01/02/2003 1:15 - Lj Harvard Rd Pian , Ene Special I=ces Preliminary Review: Type: ❑ Large Lot Bldg. Square Feet Date Received: 12/19/2002 No. Lots: No. Acres: 2.d2 Project Name UR-3.5 TO UR-7 APT 6 PLEX Site Address N. f3RQADWAY, S. CATALD0,1V. LOCUST, E. MULLAN, BROADWAY E. 9317 Applicant Conditions Niailed: QJ. PL✓ Flood Zone No Phone Dist School Dist 363 A1 Walls ~ O3 Fire Dist Ol Range-Township-Section: 44 - 25 - 17 PARCEL(S): (first 20) WALLS CUNS'fRUCTION CORP Watcr Source Public 45172.1215 45172.1216 137 S. Howe St Sewer Source SPOKANE, WA 99212- Phone (509) 534-3058 Survcyor Charles L Simpson SIMPSON ENG[NEERS INC 909 N. Argonne Rd SPOKANL, WA 99212-2789 Phone (509) 926-1322 E-ax (509) 926-1323 [3uilding 477-3675 rPlannine 477-7200 iEncineer 477-3ti00 Contact B/P DAVID JENSEN Contacl Enr; GREG BALDWIN Date Submitted pescrilition Initials Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Trafiic Analysis Eng Need Other Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed Eng Agree Priority Fees Reccived 12/16/2002 Eng Prelim Plut Fees Completed Copy to Accounting Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Compieted - or Needs to be signed Design Deviation Dates (In-Out) ! I - I l 1 / - ? ! I i' - l I Bond quanties calculatcd Hearing Date Decisiun App Den Cond Appld BCC Appeated to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Court Appealed to Court Decision App Dcn Cond Appld _ Stamped Mylars to Secretary (5andy) / j Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Sandy) r zt,s`.' - V a 1 ~ +L t ~ ~ STAFF REPQRT TO THE HEARING EXAMIRIER a° File # ZE-21-02 ~ ~ DIVISBON OF PLANtV1NG SPOw\T couwy HEARING DATE February 19 2003 at 10 30 a m FILE# ZE-21-02 PROJECT PLANNER David Jensen Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zvne Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residentral-7 (UR-7) on approximately 2 4 acres for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone PROJEGT DATA Project Location and Address 1 The proJect site is generally located north of and adjoining Broadway Avenue and approximate(y 250 feet west of Locust Road and approximately 270 feet east of Mulian Road in the NW114 of Section 17 Township 25 N Range 44 EVIlM The site address is 9317 E Broadway Avenue Parcel Number(s) 45172 1215 & 1216 (Jwner Travis Campbel1/21 S` Century LLC PO Box 14006 Spokane WA 99214 (509) 981 0999 Applicant Walls Construction Corp 137 S Howe St Spokane WA 99212 (509) 534-3058 Comprehensive Plan Designatron Low Density Residential effective January 15 2002 Exis#ing Zonmg j Urban Residential 3 5 (UR-3 5) Existing Land Use The project site is developed with a single-family residence and accessory structure Surrounding Zoninq and Land Uses 4 North The property immediately north of the proJect site is zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991 and prevrously classified as Single Family Residentiai {R-1 }{File #ZE-69-69} This property is presently developed with a smgle-family residences • Sauth Land immediately south of the project site and south of Broadway Avenue is zoned Urban Residential-7 (UR 7) established in 1991 and previous#y classified as Two Family Residential (R-2) (File # ZE-282-57) Adjoming uses to the south are developed with smgle-family residences o East Land Iocated immediately east of the project site is zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991 and previously classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) (Fi1e # ZE 231-51) and is developed for sinqle-family residences ZE 21-02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Hearing 1 s ~ . West A Land,kmmedjately west and adjacent to the prolect srte ~s zoned Urban Residential 3 5(UR-3 5) estabiished in 1991 Previc►us classifications were Single Family Residential (R-1 ) (File # 69-69) and Agricultural Suburban (AS) (File # ZE-231- 53) and is developed with single family residences Known Land Use Proposals and Recent ZE 04-97 - A recent Zone Reciassiflcation within the ProJect ApproVals in the Area of this Project vicinity of the proJect site is located approximately '/4 mile to the northwest on the southwest corner Mullan Road and Sinto Avenue This requested change from Nerghborhvod Business (B-1) and Urban Residential- 3 5 (UR 3 5) to Regional Business (B-3) was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 8 1997 Land Division Status The project site is recognized as a platted (ot of record which is described as OPPORTUNITY B62 N1/2 OF I/V112 OF W112 EXC N165FT and OPPQRTUNIN PT OF B2 EXC N165FT OF E1/2 OF W1/2 & STP E OF&ADJ 7 W OF WALNUT ADD Shorelme Designation Not applicable Water Punveyor Public water service is provided by Modern Electri c Water Company Sewage Disposal The site is located inside of the Priority Sewer Sennce Area (PSSA) and sewer service will be provided by the Spokane County sewer system Fire Distnct # The pro}ect site is located in Spokane County Fire Protection District # 1 School District and nearest K-12 schools The proJect site is focated in West Valley School Distnct #363 The public school located nearest to the proposal include Arthur B Ness Elementary School located approximately 1/5 mde ta the east of the project site on Braadway AVenue Nearest Artenal and Distance 6rvadway Avenue adJoins the project site on the south and is identified as a Principal Urban Artenal Mu11an and Argonne Roads are located approximately 1/4 of a mile west of the project site and are identified as a Pnncipal Urban Artertals Nearest Parks and Distance Bal#our Park is located approximately 2 miles to the south west of the project site N+eighborhoad Association The University Neighborhood Assoctatton boundary is located ; directly adjacent to the south of the project site o This proposal is located inside the UGA • This proposal is focated outside of any Joint Planning Area • This proposai is located rnsrde the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA) • This proposal is located outside all 1000 notification boundaries of designated (Vatural Resource Lands GMA/CRITICAL AREAS Aquifer Recharge Area The subject site is Iocated inside the Prtority 5ewer Service Area (PSSA) and within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone Fish & Wildbfe Habitat Consenrativn Areas ~ Not applicable Floadplain Review of FIRM mdreates the project site is located m Zone C and outside the 100-year flood plain Geologically Hazardous Areas ~ None identified per Cntical Areas maps zE 21 02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Heanng 2 e Wetlands ~ SThe S~okane County VNetland Inventory map for this area identifies no wetlands within or adjacent to the site SEPA 0 DNS issued February 4 2003 0 Comment penod ended February 18 2003 NOTICIfVG Published The Notice of Hearmg and DNS were advertised in the Spokesman Review legal section on February 4 2003 IVlailed Notice of Application and the Notice of Hearing were mailed to taxpayers/owners of property located withm 400 feet of the boundaries of the subject site on December 23 2002 and January 29 2003 respectively Site Posted The deadline for the applicant to post the site was February 3 2003 1724 COMPLIANCE DATES Application Submitted December 16 2002 Determination of Completeness issued January 3 2003 Date iVotice of Decision is Due Aprii 3 2003 REVIEWIIVG AGENCIES A total of 12 agencies were notified of the proposal and comments were soficited Final comments were due January 30 2003 Agencies IVotified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received Recewed Received Spokane County Division Yes December Spokane County No of Engineering and Roads 30 2002 Division of Engmeering Developer Services Spokane County Division Yes January Spokane County Yes December of Utilities 13 2003 Division of Utilities 31 2002 Stormwater Utility Spokane Regional Heaith Yes January 2 IVlodern Electnc Water No Distnct 2003 Company West Valiey School No Spokane County Parks No Distnct # 363 & Recreation Spokane County Fire Yes January 9 Spokane County Yes December Protection Distnct No 1 2003 Division of Buildmg & 26 2002 Code Enforcement Office of Histonc No Spokane County Air No Preservation Pollution Control Authority RESPOfVSES FROIVI AGENCIES OF INTEREST Responses received from agencies of interest are in the form of comment and recommended conditions of approval RESPOIVSES FROIVI THE PUBLIC The Division of Planning received no letters in response to the IVotice of Application or 1Votice of Public Hearing for the project DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The subJect site is approximately 1 73 acres in size and is located adjacent to Broadway Avenue Broadway Avenue is a paved 4-lane Principal Urban Arterial with ZE 21 02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Heanng 3 curbing The site is generally flat and is tieveloped w4h a single family residence and a detached accessory structure Surrounding uses include single family residences north, east south and west of the site ROJECT DESCRIPTIOIV Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for those uses allowed in the (UR-7) zone No detailed site plan has been submitted with this generic zone reclassification BACKGROUND The application for the proposal was submitted to the Division of Pianning on December 16, 2002 and a Technical Review Alleeting was held on January 2 2003 The Determination of Completeness was issued on January 3, 2003 and the Notice of Application was mailed on December 23, 2002 with a 14 day public comment period ending on January 6 2003 The existing zoning of the site is Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991 and previously classified as Agriculturai Suburban (AS) (File # 69-69) The adoption of Phase I Development Regulations to implement the the comprehensive Plan on January 15, 2002, Resolution #2-0037 did not change the existing zoning of the subject site Section IV Concurrency of the Phase I Developmen4 Regulations requires applications for Zone Reclassifications within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) to be evaluated for both transportation and water and sewer concurrency The Spokane County Division of Engineering has stated that if the requested Zone Reclassification is approved, A Transportation Concurrency Certificate wiil be issued at the time of buiiding permit issuance The Spokane County Division of Utilities and IVlodern Electric Water Company have signed Certificates of Concurrency stating that public water is available to serve the site and tha4 4he subject property is wi4hin 4he Spokane County Sewer six-year Capital Improvement Program COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The proJect site is located within the Low Density Residential category of 4he Spokane County Comprehensive Plan as implemented on January 15 2002 CHAPTER 2-URBAN LAND USE CATEGORIES RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES Three separa4e categories for residential use are established, ranging from low to high density Low density residential includes a density range of 1 to and including 6 dwelling units per acre medium density residential includes a range of greater than 6 to and including 15 dwelling units per acre and high density residential shali be greater than 15 dwelling units per acre Design standards ensure neighborhood character and compatibility with adjacent uses Commercial uses with the exception of office use in high-density residential areas would only be permifted through changing 4he land use category with a comprehensive plan amendment or through a neighborhood planning process GOALS UL 2 Nlaintain and enhance the quality of life in Spokane County through urban design standards POLICIES UL 2 1 Establish minimum perFormance standards within the zoning code for nuisances such as noise, vibration, smoke, particulate matter, odors, heat and giare and other aspects as appropnate to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and neighborhoods Response As proposed, the zone reclassification will generate no nuisance impacts UL 2 2 The destyn of developmen4 proposals should accommodate and complement environmental features and conditions, and preserve and protect significant cultural resources ZE 21 02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Hearing 4 9 d s ap Response Not applicable UL 2 3 Create a design review process that promotes flexibility and creativity but is prescriptive enough to achieve community standards and values The design review process should provide for administrative review by staff for proposals of small scale and complexity Larger more complex developments should require review by a design review board Response Design review process was not implemented with Phase I Development Regulations UL 2 4 Establish a design review board consisting of inembers from designated professional groups (architects engineers planners developers etc ) community representatives, and a representative from each of the affected neighborhoods or neighborhood associations Response See above response UL 2 5 Design review may be required for the following developments o Developments within designated mixed-use areas o Planned unit developments • Government buildings intended for public entry and use (post office libraries, etc ) m Aesthetic corridors • Large scale commercial and industrial developments Response See aboveresponse UL 2 6 Develop urban design guidelines" that provide consistency of application for the design review process The guidelines should focus on the functional interrelationships betvueen land use site design, neighborhood character and transportation systems Response See above response UL 2 7 The design review process shall not increase the length and shall run concurrent with the land use approval process Response See aboveresponse UL 2 8 Encourage developers to work with neighborhoods to develop plans that address neighborhood concems, such as environmental protection historic preservation, quality of life, property values and preservation of open space Response Developers are encouraged to recognize histonc preservation The application was circulated to the Office of Histonc Preservation To date, no written comments have been received by the Division of Planning UL 2 9 Develop neighborhood sub-area and community plans with specific design standards that reflect and preserve community character Response Not applicable No sub-area planning has been initiated in this area UL 2 10 Mixed-use or mixed-density developments should be encouraged where they would be compatible with neighborhood character ZE 21-02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Hearing 5 Resqonse Not applicable -0 ag = UL 2 11 Promote linkage of developments with open space parks natural areas and street connections Response As proposed the project does not impede any of the above linkages UL 2 12 Enhance and preserve the site characteristics of residential development (existing trees watercourses, historic features and similar assets) through sensitive site planning tools such as clustering lot averaging transfer of development rights and flexible setback requirements Response Developers are encouraged to recognize historic preservation The application was circulated to the Office of Historic Preservation To date, no written comments have been received by the Division of Planning UL 2 13 Provide for a compatible mix of housing and commercial uses in all commercial distncts neighborhood centers, community centers and urban activity centers Response As proposed the proJect will enhance the compatible mix of housing and commercial uses existing in the neighborhood UL 2 14 Separated sidewalks shall be required on public roads in all new residential subdivisions Response Not applicabie UL 2 15 Encourage the planting of curbside trees in residential subdivisions identify those species of trees that are most appropriate for curbside plantings considering safety soils, aesthetics and compatibility with infrastructure Response Not applicable ZONING AIVALYSIS The purpose of the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone is to set standards for the orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable Iwing environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values It is intended 4hat this zone be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities up to approximately seven (7) urnts per acre, and as an implementation tool for the Comprehensive Plan Urban Category General characteristics of these areas include paved roads, public sewer and water accessibility to schoois and libranes and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit accessibility IVledium density UR-7 areas are typified by single family-dwellings on small lots duplexes, low density apartments and manufactured home parks Response Taking into consideration the existing surrounding uses, the project, as proposed generally conforms to the stated purpose and intent of the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone Existing zoning in the area includes Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to the south, Community Business (B-2), Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) and Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to the west Zoning to the north and the west include Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) ZE 21 02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Hearing 6 SITE PLAN IVo site pian has been submitted fof •this g`eneric zone reclassification application for those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone Subsequent site plan review is administrative and shall be conducted prior to the issuance of any building permits to determine compliance with the Spokane County Zoning Code STAFF SUMtViARY As conditioned by the reviewing agencies the proposal demonstrates general consistency with the applicable Goals and Policies of the Low Density Residential category of the Comprehensive Plan The location of the proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Urban Residentiai-7 (UR-7) zone when taking into consideration the location criteria and development standards for residential development The Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone implements the Low Density Residential Category of the Comprehensive Plan per Section II of the Phase I Development Regulations ATTACHMENTS A Maps e Vicirnty Map m Comprehensive Plan Map • Zoning Map B Conditions of Approval C Agency Comments ZE 21 02 Staff Report - February 19 2003 Public Heanng 7 I ~ . I ATTACHMENT A MAPS VICINITY MAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP EXISTING ZONING MAP S i~ ~ ~ ~ s > ~ ~ r ~ ~ Con' ~ . 13 ~ ► ` ` 19 r U 24 ~ x so ' •zE-2q-02 ' - ComPrehensive Land Use Plan~ ] - ~ ~ . , ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - =DR - _ a ~ ~ - - ~ ~ i J- ~ - - - _ _ _ ~ - - - ' - ~ - ~ - ~ . ~ , Scale :1 inch = 833 h(rounded) 12/18/02 Comprehensive land Use Plan Subject Property within UGA. Subject Property within ASA. t t t t f t t tSubject Property within PSSA. Ift•t'R•4ft Subject Property outaide NRL & Buffer. r Z&24-02. ' Phase I ioning . ~ . - 6~ 11-1 a.oc e-, ac ac ~ e. ~ . i21 W vAi-i.6 W ; LOW- . .Minin UR -3.6 t047 -n ~ e- ~ u a 6 w (~,.6 1 M4 c r. ~J~ _ W ~ a . ~ .6 aC 24 24 n - LL B~- 1 p ffu !2 W*OZZg nL ~ 6 . . - - - 67 ' . _ ' ' : ' . • - . . . : , UR-!f 32 10 / 11-1179C 1lq~ . . . . • • - s--- ~ . . una. M 47 ~ : . . _ ' . . . : : S . eld e-1 a ac , . : ~ . . ~ . ~ . . .i 70 , . . - : . . ~ OURaf 32 22: ~12712- . . i tM4.6Sr,u I~ ~f.i 704 • : ilil-7:~~11, ; . . , UR-i.5 2!! 47 . ~ - i~~:. . . : . : . . 32 ~ . . . • - . ~ • - - 7. j . . . . . . . UR-i _ . ' ~ ' " ' . RIJR-3J6 43 M ~ ~ • _ . . , . , , . . . . - , . , . . . . . . . . • =T 27• Ui-~ • ' ' r : _ : • ' : ' uw. I t ; Scale : 1 inch = 500 ft(raxndec) 12h8102 Phase 1 ZDning KZE-21-02 ~ . . Site Plan . I . . ~ ~ , . . ~ . . LoT sM - .s9s Acm ~ wfr sia - 1428 A"a . . ~ ' ~ . . ' TO'fAL LAND SIZ8 = 143i Acrca ~ I SI'i8 ADDRESS • 9317 E. &usdwv Awe. ' PARCEL NL]MBM • 43172-1213 ~ I Sl'72-121G - E.YI3TM 7UNE - L!R-3.3 . , PFt0P0= - UR-7 ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ CREMOVE EXISTWd QARA43E r . _ :0V_E I7.f►,1STM HLJLI'KS • e ~ .51 es6 %AAYLIG BR4ADWAi►Y AVE, PLOT FLA►i~ RE-ZflNE ~iu~ . L►.p ~ 12f18102 Site Plan , . . . ATTACHMENT B CONDTRONS OF APPROVAL . • • ► , r . ~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ZE-21-02 A DIVISION OF PLANNING 5POKANT COLT.NM' -1 . A~11 COnOi~10(lS Ii7-ipOSI;:;~ J j~ "t-l~; H°c~( ii ;y %-;;alin';;1~'t' s1~~:3li `~..`k~ Ditl:aif-,C~. C(l t C ~lpt~llCaf 1'C ,'•~1;'i i~~tl term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The Zone Reclassification applies to the following real property: "Opportunity 662 N1/2 oF W1/2 of W1/2 exc N165ft" and "4pportunity PT of B2 exc N165ft of; E1/2 of W1/2 & stp E. of & adj 7 W of Walnut Add 3. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Appiicant", wi,,ich term shall include the owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 4. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone and all applicable Chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 5. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns includi= addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems. building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wa ~l. protection and energy code requirements. 6. Site plan review is administrative and shall be conducted prior to the issuance of any building permits to determine performance compliance with the Urban Residential-7 (UR- 7) zone and all applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code as amended. 7. Any future division of the parcel shall demonstrate compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. . 8. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions irnposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as - public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally apply as follows: The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on February 19, 2003, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-21-02 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning. . . . . ATTACHMENT C I AGENCY COMMENTS J . Jensen, Davad er ~ . w Froen Peterschmidt Lucy Sent Tuesday December 31 2002 12 08 PM To Jensen David Subject ZE-21-02 Hi David We have reviewed this application and Environmental Checklist and have no comments on the current proposal Thanks Lucy Lucy Peterschmidt P E Stormwater Utility Engmeer 477-7679 i 1 ~ ► } SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS a Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County b Water service shall be coorduiated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County c Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health d A public sewer system will be made available for the project e Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited f 1 ~ ) l ) 'I'ECHNICAL REVIIEW IVIEE'I'ING SP0KANE COUNZ'Y Dnq5I0N OF PLANNING Date January 2, 2003 Department Spokane Regional Health District Department Contact Person Steven olderby, R S Action ZE-21-02, Zone reclassification from Urban Residiential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential- 7(LTR-7) on approxunately 2 423 acres for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone TECHINCAL REVIEW MEETING January 2, 2003 @ 1 15 p m iilote The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public heanng rtems heard before the Heanng Examiner The following uiformation does not provide a complete or bindulg final review of the proposal This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Heanng Agenda The acceptance of the annlication and schedulmE of the apnlication on the Public Hearuig Agenda is the pnmary function of this meetmg A secondary function of tlus meetuig is to provide a nreluninarv review of the annlication This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations The comrnents received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Deparhnents and Agencies wluch have been cuculated the information (not all agencies/deparkments have been contacted-only those who have been determuied to have pnmary interest ) 1 a Does the application (or can the development) meet requuements to be placed on the Public Hearmg Agenda? 0 YES ❑ NO b If no, what is lacking? 2 After a preluYUnarv review of the annlication what "Condinons of Approval" would be requued of the development? (Attach condrtions if necessary) See attached conditions ) I ~ 4 I 11 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKANE WA 99260 509 477 3675 SPOKAteCovKrY Recommended Conditions File Number ZE-21-02 The apphcant should contact the Division of Builduig and Code Enforcement at the earLest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admuustered/enforced as authonzed by the State Bwlchng Code Act Design/development concerns include addressing 6re apparatus access roads fire hydrant flow approved water systems builduig accessibility constructton type occupancy classificanon extsting exterior wall protectton and energy code requirements c mm rciat FootinE & ro aaN Permit ngreemenc oz/oa/oo TECE11\HCAL REVIEW MIEEa Jtl`i~ ~~OKANE ~OU1V TY DM►~~~~ ~~ANNING I)ate 2 ~ ~L003 Department ~ v►~, a~ o~' gv ~ o~r,r. ~ Coc~e ~r..~orcem Department Contact Person Ror a~r~ Action Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) to Urban Residential- 7(UR-7) on approxunately 2 423 for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone ) TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING JANUARY 2, 2003 @ 1 15 P M IVOtC ' The following uiformaUon is to provide the proposal sponsor with pnmary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public heanrig rtems heazd before the Heanng Exammer The followuig uiformahon does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal This vvill occur only after the proposal is accepted aad placed on the Public Heanng Agenda The function of tlus meetuig is to provide a prelumnar.y review of the applicahon This wnll provide a forum for the sponsor and other deparhnents of what to expect as standazd development condirions and design recommendations 1'he comments receaved are based on a prelirrunary review of the application form and srte plan by the Departments and Agencies wluch have been cuculated the uiformation (not all agencies/departments have been contacted--only those who have been determined to have pnmary interest 1 a Does the application (or can the development) meet requuements to be placed on the Public Heanng Agenda? ~ YES ❑ NO b If no, what is lacking? c Public Heanng Schedule Hearmgs before the Heanng Examiner are scheduled upon deternunation that the apphcation is complete Items wnll be scheduled for the first avazlable public hearing 2 After a preliminary review of the auplication what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) 6e~~ Page '-2 Enqineers i Hearing / Review / 01/02/2003 TR 2E-0021-02 Note A 5-year moratorium on pavement cuts is in effect for this segment of Broadwray Avenue due $o the recent paving by ULID # 02 - 01 6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater nllanagement in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 7 Roadwray standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 8 IVo construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed ngh4 of way until a permit has been issued by the Countjr Engineer All work within the public road nght of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9 AII required construction within the existing or proposed public nght of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer 10 "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities ""The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work " 'I'i The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards 12 This proposed zone change is not being requested for a specific development proposal or site plan at this time At such 4ime a site plan is submitted for review, the appiicant shall submit detailed 4raffic information for reviewr by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, af any, 4hat the development would have on surrounding infrastructure The applicant is advised that mitigation maybe required for off-site improvements Note When a specific development proposal or site plan is submitted, these plans will be reviewed for Transportation Concurrency in accordance with the Phase 1- Development Regulations 13 The Spokane County Engineer will review this project for transportation concurrency requirements at the time of building permit application review, when the project is defined with a specific use EIVD ) OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUIVTY EIVGIIVEER 1026 W Broadway Ave Spokane WA 99260 0170 SKNAM couKY f 5091477-3600 Fax 15091477-2243 . - . . - "ENGI1dE:ER' S COBJDITIONS OF APPItOVAL" TR ZO1dE = - TO Spokane County Division of Planni g ~ FROM Division of Engineering & Roads DATE December 30, 2002 PROJECT UR-3 5 TO UR-7 APT 6 PLEX FOLE # ZE-0021-02 Technical/Review Date (01/0212003 @ 1 15) Planner DAVID JENSEN Heanng Date @ Review Date Sponsor/Applicant AL WALLS Section Township Range 17-25-44 The Spokane County Division of Engmeenng and Roads has reviewed the above referenced application The following "°Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Plannmg for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved Prior to release of a bualdang permet oP use of propeety as proposed 1 Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system 2 A Professional Engineer (P E), licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit road and storm drainage construction pians and a drainage report that conform to the versions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stormwater iVlanagement, and all applicable federal, state, and locai regulations and laws that are in effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s) The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shaii receive the County Engineer's acceptance pnor to release of any associated Grading. Building, or Right-of-Way Permit 3 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices 4 The constnection of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accompiished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 5 No improvements are required for Broadway Avenue because CRP 1409 and ULID 02-01 constructed these amprovements CC Applicant AL WALLS Engineer/Surveyor Planner DAVID JENSEN i TEcHNi~~~ RF-viEw ~~ETiNQ Spokane County Davosaon of POannung Date January 3, 2003 Divosion Contact David Jensen Fi le ZE-21-02 Actaon Zone Re-classification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential- 7(UR-7) for purposes allowed in the (UR-7) Zone PBanning Comments 1 The application is complete as submitted and will be placed on the next available Heanng Examiner agenda at the time that the 14-day public notice is complete (January 6, 2003) 2~t2 03 ; ---f-' ~ . _ - - . : . ~ ` TECHNICAL REVIEW SUNIMARY ~ 8B AND DETERMIfVATION ~ spow~T coul\uy DIVISION OF PLANNING ~ . _ - - . - - - i ....__Technical Review IVleeting Date January 2, 2003 Time 1 15 P IN Location Current Planning Conf Rm Project Planner David Jensen File # ZE-21-02 Project Description Zone Re-classification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for the purposes of uses allowed in the (UR-7) Zone Applicant Walls Construction, 137 S Howe St, Spokane, WA 99214 Date Accepted (Complete) December 16, 2002 (all revisions must be submitted within 6 months of the date accepted) The following items need to be satisfied before this project/proposal can be considered technically complete Spokane County • .0 Division of Planning Comments attached Dated # of pages I 0 Division of Utilitiis O Sewer omments attached Da4ed # of pages ~ Comments attached Dated ANw-o-~ # of pages ~ Division of Engineering and Roads O Drainage Comments attached Dated ~ # of pages .N(Transportation Comments attached Dated O 8 2- # of pages l O Boundary Review Board Comments attached Dated # of pages Other Agencies X Regional Health District Comments attached Dated o 3 # of pages ~ O School Distnct # Comments attached Dated # of pages O Fire Distnct # Comments attached Dated # of pages 0 Department of Transportation Comments attached Dated # of pages O Water District Comments attached Dated # of pages O Department of Ecology Comments attached Dated of pages ~ ~ Comments attached Dated # of pages ~ El Comments attached Dated # of pages ~ Comments attached Dated # of pages ~ Date I 3 0 2 S'gnature ~ v ul/11~rud rxl ua ua rAl Dub tsat 4195 bYUriANh VALLr,Y r1Kh llhY'1 4-+-+ BUILDING CODE 10006 ~ 5POKANE vALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ Spokane County Fire DistrJct 1 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE SPOKANE WA 99206 3676 (509) 928-1700 FAX (509) 802 4125 Mark Grover enlo4 January 9, 2003 David Jensen Department of Building and Plannmg 10261/V Broadway Spolcane, WA 99260 RE Zone Reclassrfication ZE21-02 Dear Nlr Jensen The Spokane Valley Fire Depcatment has no objection to thes zone reclassfficatiori Sincerely, ~ Kevin N9iiler peputy Fire Marshal K1Aldc i ) I ) To David Jensen (Division of Planning) CC From Jim Red (Division of Utilities) Date Friday February 07 2003 Subject ZE-0021-02 Stage Hearing Examiner Phase 9317 E Broadway SS09 As per the Spokane County Zoning Code Phase One Development Regulations a wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to estabiish sewer fees SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities under separate cover' only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit histoncal and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal SS12F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer connection permit 11US01 Any water service for this project shall be provided m accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County as amended SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT ~ I 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKRNE, WA 99260 SPOYME COL7-4,TY 509 477 3675 Recommended Conditions File Number ZE-21-02 The apphcant should contact the Division of Builduig and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements adnurustered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, bwlding accessibthty, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements C mm rcinl F l( p& f d U P rtnlt Anreem t(Y2/(IR/(10 7 f ~ J@P1Seli'1, DaV1d Frorn Hand Ron Sent Monday January 27 2003 10 20 AiVI Yo Jensen David Subject Public Hearing for ZE-21-02 David The Division of Building & Code Enforcement has no additional comments on ZE 21 02 Ron Hand Developmenr Assrstance Coordinafor Tel 477-7500 i ) To David Jensen (Division of Planning) CC From Jim Red (Division of Utilities) Da4e IVlonday January 13 2003 Sub,ect ZE-0021 02 Stage Technical Review Phase 9317 E Broadway SS09 As per the Spokane County Zoning Code Phase One Development Regulations a wet (Iive) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection permit is required Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities under separate cover only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit histoncal and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal SS12F Sewer plans accep4abte to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted pnor to the issuance of the sewer connection permit WS01 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County as amended i ~ A ) s Jensen, David :...From Brum Teresa Sent Monday January 06 2003 4 29 PM To Jensen David Subjec4 RE ZE-21 02 Thanks David The notice was stamped in on the 26th and I no longer have the envelope so I don t know when it was received I had temp staff in the office on the 24th so it might have come in on that day Thanks for the advice about attending the hearing--I will plan on it Teresa L Brum okane City County Histonc Preservation Director Fty Hall Room 614 808 West Spokane Falls Blvd Spokane, Washington 99201 (509)625 6983 Onginal Message- From ]ensen, David 5ent Monday ]anuary 06, 2003 4 13 PM To Brum, Teresa Subject RE ZE 21 02 Teresa I m troubled that you did not recieve your Circulation Notice until 12/26 Support staff sent them out on the 23rd Let me know if the postmark was any different The heanng is tentativly scheduled for 2/12/03 @ a time yet to be put on the agenda Keep in mind that public comment made in person at the heanng is important You may wish to consider attendmg You should also recieve automatic notification of this hearing date and time Please let me know if I can be of further assistance and please also stay in touch re heanng date and time Oh And try to get your written comments in several days prior to the heanng if you want to make sure that the Examiner gets a chance to read them beforehand David Jensen ----Original Message----- From Brum Teresa Sent. Monday, ]anuary 06, 2003 3 18 PM To 7ensen David Subject ZE 21 02 Hi David Thanks for the fax on the technical review meetmg notice for your file ZE-21-02 You had said that the comment period was open untii the Hearing Examiner s hearing could you please tell me when that would be? (I m just getting back into the office after being gone 2 weeks and I did find the copies you sent over--we didn t receive them until Dec 261) Teresa L Brum Sp okane City County Historic Preservation Director City Hall Room 614 808 4est Zoshington kane Falls Blvd Spokane, 99201 (509)625-6983 1 Jensen, Daved , From Peterschmidt Lucy Sent Tuesday December 31 2002 12 OS PM To Jensen David Subjec4 ZE-21-02 Hi David We have reviewed this application and Environmental Checklist and have no comments on the current proposal Thanks Lucy Lucy Peterschmidt P E S4ormwater Utility Engineer 477-7679 1 r > . . , S P O K A. N E C O U N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering arid Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer West Valley School District No. 363 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Modern Electric Water District Office of Historic Preservation, Teresa Brum FROM: David Jensen, Associate Planner DATE: January 28, 2003 ~ SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing on February 12, 2003 RESCHEDULED TO 2-19-03 AT 10:30 AM FILE NO: ZE-21-02 BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residentil-3.5 to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on approximately 2.4 acres for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone. PARCEL NO: 45172.1215 & 45172.1216 APPLICANT: A1 Walls, Walls Construction, 137 S. Howe St. Spokane, WA 99212 OWNER: Travis Campbell @ 21 ' Century, PO box 14006, Spokane, WA 99214 Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review and return any comments to me by January 30, 2003 Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing MA1L STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHIlVGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133 r . . . NUTICE UF PUBLIC HEA►RiNG SP[]KAN'E CUUNT4' HEARING EXAMINER TU: A11 interested persons, and ownersltaxpayers within 400 feet YUU ARE HEREBY NUTXFIED THAT A PUBI.IC HEARING WILL BE HELD iDN THE LAND USE APPLICATIUN LISTED BELCIW, AS FOLL4WS: Applicativn: ZE-2I-02; Zone reclassificativn from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for purposes a.llowed in the (i.JR-?) zone. Parcel Na(s): 45172.1215 &.1216 Hearing Date and Time: February 19,2003 @ 10:30 am Piace: Commissivners Assembly Raom, Lower Level, Spflkane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washingtan. Applieant: A1 Walls, Walls Constructian, 137 S. Hawe St. Spokane, WA 99212 +C)wner: Travis Campbell @ 21 " Century, P[7 Box 14406, Spakane, WA 99214 I,ocativa; Genexally located east of Mullan Road, west of Locust Road and svut.h of Catalda Ave and directly north of and adj acent tv Broadway Ave in the N W'/a of Section 17, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM. The site address is 9317 E. Broadway. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Exxistiag Zoniag; Urban Residential - 3.5 Enviranmental Determinatioa: A Determinatian of Nansignificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Planning as #he lead agency on February 4, 2003. The comment period ends February 18, 2003. Related Permits; In order for the prvject to be deueloped as prvpvsed, additional permits must be abt.a.ined as requised by other local, state and federal agencies. Division of Planning Staff: Dawid Jensen, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7237 HEARING EXAMINER, PRUCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeais: The hearing will be conducted under the rtxles of prvicedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 1-0700. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and dacuments before or at the hearing, The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each si+de of the issue is encauraged. Any appeal of ttliie IIearing Examiner's decision will be based vn the record established before the Heaxing Examiner, pursuant to Caunty Resolutian Nas. 96-417 1. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the uriderlying action. A11 hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons with physieal disabilities. Inspect%on of File, Copies of Dveuments: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspectian seven days before the hearing. The Staff Repnrt and application ftle may be inspected at the Spokane County Divisivn ofPlanning, 1s` Floor Pennit Center, Public Woarks Building, 1426 W. Braadway, Spokane, WA 99260-4220, be#w+een 8:30 a.m. and S:OQ p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Capies of documents will be made available for the cast of repraduction. If you have any questians or special _ needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Serid written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning, 1026 W. Braadway, Sgokane, WA 99250-0220, Attn; David 3ensen, File No. ZE- 21-02. Mvtions must be made in writing and submitted ta the Spokane County Hearing Exarriiner, 102+5 W. Brvadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245. • . , . i DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER: ZE-21-02 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for purposes allowed in the ur-7 zone. PARCEL NO'S.: 45172.1215 & 45172.1216 HEARING DATE AND TIME: February 19, 2003 @ 10:30 am APPLICANT: Al Walls @ Walls Construction, 137 S. Howe St. Spokane, WA 99212 OWNER: Travis Campbell @ 21 St Century, PO Box 14006. Spokane, WA 99214 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located east of Mullan Rd. west of Locust Road and south of Cataldo Ave and directly north of and adjacent to Broadway Ave. in the NW of Section 17, Tow:►ship 25N, Range 44 EWM. The site address is 9317 E. Broadway Ave. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING DETERNIINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 14 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later t6an 5:00 p.m., February 18, 2003, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments s6ould be sent to the contact persoa listed below. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: David Jensen, Associate Planner Spokane County Division of Planning 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0220 ~ (509) 477-7237 DATE ISSUED: February 4, 2008 SIGNATURE: 4~~ A-5-~~~ Y OONgVIIINI'S R,FGARDIlVG IIvVIRONMIIqTAL OONCFRNS ARE AT TIHE HFARING. APPEAL OF TffiS DETERNIINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: - 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineertng, Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard 3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman 4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims 6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby 7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Ron Hand 8. Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rohwer 9. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 10. Modern Electric Water District S P O K A N E C O U N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTIvIENT DIVISION OF PLANNIIVG MEMORANDUM TO. Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c% Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer West Valley School District No. 363 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Modern Electric Water District Office of Historic Preservation, Teresa Bnun FROM: David Jensen, Associate Planner DATE: January 16, 2003 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing on February 12, 2003 FILE NO: ZE-21 •02 BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Zone reclassification from Urban Residentil-3.5 to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) on approximately 2.4 acres for those uses atlowed in the UR-7 zone. PARCEL NO: 45172.1215 & 45172.1216 APPLICANT: A1 Walls, Walls Construction, 137 S. Howe St. Spokane, WA 99212 OWNER: Travis Campbell @ 21 ' Century, PO box 14006, Spokane, WA 99214 Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review and return any comments to me by January 30, 2003 Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing MAILS'POP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTk PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509} 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-711. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet . YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ; LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: Application: ZE-21-02; Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for purposes allowed in the (UR-7) zone. Parcel No(s): 45172.1215 & .1216 - Hearing Date and Time: February 12, 2003 @ 10:30 am Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Applicant: A1 Walls, Walls Construction, 137 S. Howe St. Spokane, WA 99212 Owner: Travis Campbell @ 21 ' Centuiy, PO Box 14006, Spokane, WA 99214 Location: Generally located east of Mullan Road, west of Locust Road and south of Cataldo Ave and directly north of and adjacent to Broadway Ave in the NW '/4 of Section 17, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM. The site address is 9317 E. Broadway. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Existing Zoning: Urban Residential - 3.5 Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Planning as the lead agency on January 28, 2003. The comment period ends February 11, 2003. Related Permits: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional permits must be obtained as required by other local, state and federal agencies. Division of Planning Staff: David Jensen, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7237 HEARING Ex:AMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 1-0700. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. - Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Planning, V Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, Attn: David Jensen, File No. ZE- 21-02. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245. ~ . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0170 5ixGx,KI, (509) 477-3600 Fax (509) 477-224~ "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE TO: Spokane County Division of Planning 1 ~ FROM: Division of En9ineerin9 & Roads DATE: December 30, 2002 PROJECT: UR-3.5 TO UR-7 APT 6 PLEX FILE ZE-0021-02 Tech n ical/Review Date: (01/02/2003 @ 1:15) Planner: DAVID JENSEN Hearing Date: @ Review Date Sponsor/Applicant: AL WALLS Section Township Range: 17-25-44 The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. 2. A Professional Engineer (P.E.), licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit road and storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws that are in effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s). The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of any associated Grading, Building, or Right-of-Way Permit. 3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. 4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 5. No improvements are required for Broadway Avenue because CRP 1409 and ULID 02-01 constructed these improvements. CC: Applicant AL WALLS Engineer/Surveyor Planner DP.VID JENSEN Pdg2 2 Engln@@rS A ;j • Hearinq / Review J 01I02I2003 TR ZE-0021-02 No#e; A5-year moratorium vn pavement cuts is in effect far this segment of Brvadway Auenue due to the recent paving by ULID #02 -01. 9 6. All required improvements shali canform to the current State of 1Nashingtan Standard Specificatians far Raad and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaining tv Road Standards and 5tormwater Management in effect at the date of canstruc#ion, unless vfherwise appro►ved by the County Engineer. 7. Raadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spakane Board of Gounty Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this prvposal. 8. Nv construction wvrk is to be perfarmed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. A(I work v+vi#hin the public road right af way is subject to inspection and appraval by the County Engineer. 9. All required construction wi#hin the existing or prvpvsed public right of way is to be cvmpleted prior to the release of a building permit or a band in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to caver the cost of construction vr improvements shali be filed with the County Engineer. 10. "T'he applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either undergraund or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including prvperty to be dedieated or set aside future acquisitiQn. Spakane County will assume no financiaf obligation for adjustments or reiocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant shou[d contact the appiicable utilities regard'ung responsibility for adjustmen# or relvcatian costs anti to make arrangements for any necessary work." 11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent ta Spakane County Right of Vllay per Spokane County Standards. 12. This proposed zane change is not being requested far a specific deuelopment proposar ar si#e plan at this time. At such time a site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic infarmation for review by the Caunty Engineer ta de#ermine what traffiic irnpacts, if any, that the developmen# ►would have on surraunding infrastructure. The appficant is advised that mitigation maybe required for aff-site improvemerats. 1VQte: When a specifc develapmen# proposal or site plan is submitted, these plans will be reviewed for Transporfatian Concurrency in accord,ance with the Phase 1- Develflpment Regulatians. 13. The Spakane Cvunty Engineer will review this project for transpartation concurreracy requirements at the time af building permit application revievu, when the project rs defined with a specifie use. END . . S P O K A N E C O U N WE VE7r-N A DNISION OF THIE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART'NiENT DE" 19 ZgO~ DIVISION OF PLANNIIVG SPO(CME COU MEMORANDUM N1Y ENGINE EA TO: Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims I Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer . Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glenn Miles . Spokane Transit Authority, Gordon Howell West Valley School District # 363 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Modern Electric Water District Office of Historic Preservation, Teresa Brum FROM: David Jensen, Planner DATE: December 19, 2002 SUBJECT: (File No.ZE-21-02) Zone Reclassification from UR-3.5 to UR-7 _ TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING January 2, 2003 at 1:15 P.M. Public Works, Current Planning Conference Room, 1" Floor Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS will be ' given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file. Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me ,a 477-7-100. N( )TE': 'I'tie I)iNisiun of 11.imiiug is circulating tiie SI.;I'A, Checl.list fi,r c0ijtti1ti►ts. "I'liis will be the oaly time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist for this pr-oject. Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, Vicinity Map, SEPA Checklist Copy with enclosures:University Neighborhood Association (if so, enclose tech review letter at end of this master) - Copy without enclosures: Owner: Travis Campbell, 21n Cent. LLC, 818 W. Riverside Ave # 530. Sroklne. QT?0 I Agent: Al Walls, 137 S. Howe St., Spokane, WA 99212 Surveyor: Charles Simpson, N. 909 Argonne Rd., Spokane, WA 9921:' MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133 . Spokane County Division of Planning Tec6nical Review Meeting Meeting Date and Time:January 2, 2003 @ 1:15 p.m. Project File No.: ZE-21-02 Project Location: Generally located east of Mullan Rd. and west of Locust Rd and north of Cataldo Ave and directly south of and adjacent to Broadway Ave. and in the NW 1/4 of Section 17, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential Project Description: Zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (LJR-7) on approximately 2.423 for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone. Parcel No(s): 45172.1215 and 45172.1216 Owner: 21 g` Century LLC, c/o Travis Campbell 818 W. Riverside Ave #530 Spokane, WA 99201 Applicant: Walls Construction Corp., c/o A1 Walls 137 S. Howe St. Spokane, WA 99212 Agent: Simpson Engineers C/O Charles Simpson N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 9921 Project Planner: David Jensen , , . , • - • ~ , • . . . • S P ~P~ ZE~21DI VT5 F-i~6 Ty Sp0 ECEIVED ZONE RECLASSIFICAT&*PMTION E CoUN _ ~ DEC . OIVISION pF P 1 02 PA RT I NG DI yr N pF pL-4 Iq ~ . . .1 . _ . Applicant ~ oAj s cQr" Mailing Address L3n S - City ~ State ~A Zip Code 212/a Phone 5:3;y- 3O S Q' (Work) Sayn C (klcaqe) Fax 5,-3 a 6 Legal Owner _-.c? / s4- C. ' Mailing Address -2S TivinS ~dL AAa It530 (iv- 9sEjX / yvp(A - clqai(l) city Smk-Lyi state ~JA zip code UQ (W - o q] o Phone CL$'f - O q 9 9 (Work) ~ Anr~ £ (Home) Fax Agent, if different from applicant S+14mc Mailing Address S{a 1Mie City State Zip Code Phone (Work) (Home) Fax Project/proposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) a3 e,J Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq. ft.) Assessors parcel #(s) of project/proposal Assessors parcel #(s)of adjacent area owned or controlled Street address of proposal uL9 F&--Q Existing zone classification(s) and date establfshed .SExisting use of property fk v...s# . ~ Proposed zoning UR - `7 Comprehensive plan category School district Water purveyor Y-h~~~r, 4 Fire district ;6~~ Proposed use of property: Single family dwellings Duplexes Mulltifamify dwellings (4 Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( ) Other ( ) - Descdbe List previous planning divlsion actions involving thfs property ~ s ' , . ZONE RECLASSlFICA1'iQM ArPLICATION & ' " ~ - PAGE 2 of 5 r~ Address and Locatian of propvsal ~ Secbon 1~ Township 25 hJ Range Name of pubricfprivate rvad(s) providing access ~ Wd#h of praperty frQnting on publiclprivate rvad 1~ii Does the proposal have access ta an arterial or pfanned arterial? Yes (>O No Name(s) of arterial roads 61ro C'A P~V~Q- L al descri tFVn of rope ~ - eg p p rty fvr each zone reclassrficatian propvsed Existing zone(s) tv proposed zorae(s) [.A R -r7 Tor the follawing described pfoperty: . (A#tach legal description s#amped by land surveyor ar provide below.) ci if you do not hold title to the prop", what is your in#erest in it? A ' -QS 0. ~ '~3,.~.►~r~.~ 7 cl~ ~ r~.. , What are the changed condifivns vf the area which you feel make this proposal wamanted? Rl-uy-'x . . ' I • , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION - • ' PAGE 3 of 5 - What factors support the zone reclassification? , , . Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan at ckt r k C~1___~~-~.rJ ~,,~L• ~j„ t-L . ~ Vxw Compiiance with purpose and intent of zoning ~.,.Q VV%.k ~►J ~ ~~.~OvJ ~ ~ Description of changed conditions of the area that you feel make this proposal wamanted ~ °~-4•~ ~~s ~ ~ ~ lKg - 1-7 a - ~ 1(~.~9~►,~ . ~ What impact will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? -Ak~,L - tv1 V I.v'S - : :a C I What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use? PART II FIRE MARSHALL / FIRE DISTRICT RCW 36.70 B requires eariy coord(nation and infoRnation 9. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. B. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE MADE TO MEET THE DISTRICTS FtRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS? 14't I ~ w~l ( l~ G~~ ~ ~'~-~.s} ~ -t~ ~ C. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED: D. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW (gallons per minute): ~~.k `~J ► ~ ~ 1 have ravlewed the proposaJ and have advJsed the appllcant of the Flne Dlstrrct req►ulrements. c~..~ C~0~ ~-t~5 ~...Q.~. ~/'G 2 SI(3NATURE TITLE DATE , . / ' a • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 4 of 5 WATER PURVEYOR RCW 36.70 8 requires early coordination and information A. THIS PRO O AL IS WITNIN WATER DISTRICT: B. SATISFACTORY A R NGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND IRE FLOW HAVE BEEN MADE AS FOLLOWS: ~ ~ A WATER SYSTEM PLAN MUST BE-RREPARED: ~ YES NO REQUIREMENTS: C. ( ) SEE ATTACHED LETTER ,4TED: ~ sal and h ave advised the applicant of the Distric e uiremenfs. I have revi77" . SIGNATURE TITLE DA:rE" SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT RCW 36.70 B requires early coordination and information A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PIACE,A COMPLETE APPLICATION MUST ~I NC LU DE: t~✓~- ~ B. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED: ARer a preliminary review of fhe proposal, l have advised the applicant of some of the Spokane Regional Health requirements. A complete and detailed review will be provided after the applicafion is submitted, which will result in a complete list of requiremenfs and condifions regarding Nealrh provi ' ns for the pruposal. ~ ~i `'SI ATUF~E TITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR ~ (City of Spokane or Liberty Lake) RCW 36.70 B requires early coordination and information A PRELIMINARY DISC ION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLE ~LIC~ATION MUST INCLUDE: B. SEE ATTACHED L DATED: ~ At~er a pr~elim' r~view of fhe proposal, 1 have advised the ap fca ~t of some of the Sewe irements. A comp/efe and detailed review will be provfded a~` the application - is sub , whlch w111 resulr in a complete list of requirements and condifions rega Sewer provislons or the prnposaL . SIGNATURE TITLE DAT*,,,. S, "ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOr !LiCATIOM Pld1GE 5 C?f rJ ► ' , • - , SURVEY4R R I ~ . the unde '.c,Ta d I~nd~ eyor, have completed the infvrmatian requested fvr the zoning map and w n:1egal ' tian~ Signed Qate l Z.-. ~ t f /D z- Address k - Phvne 9~~ ~ 2.~ YiRES 7-ti7, _ City State - ZiP --392- l Z PART1I1 StGNATURE C1F PRt?PERTY OWWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHC?RIZATiON I, the undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of pedury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best oT my knowfedge. I further swear or affirrn that t am the owner of record vf the area ptoposed for the previously Edentified land use action, ar, if nat the owner, attached herewith is written permissian from the owner authorizing my actions on hislher beha(f. Signed AcmAmot A. tu&.6% Date I Z- -1 Z-?> Z Address ~ - ) 17 HAlvz Phone 53v-:50S s( C itY v +Q 5tate W!~2_ Zi p 4f.Z1Z Signature o Applicant or Representative Da#e State of Washington } ) ss: County af Spakane y 3dDZ,, Signed and swQm or a~firmed before me vr~ this ~T`~ day vf 0 e,G~»ti~a►~ r,~~ by No#ary Seal k,c~► Notary Public in an+d for the S#ate of WasFringtQn residing at ~ - = DUA My appointmen# expires = ~1~ M. ~-iE:LT ~ ~ M03'ARY PUBLIC StATE OF WASH4NGTON ~ ~ GOMMI55fON E7tP°iRES:.ltJLI B. 2008 = ~111111111111~1i11i11~llilll11111tlllllillillllEl{IIIII~ PART IV TQ BE CC►MPLETEQ BY THE [JIVISiQN QF PLANNIMG Date submitted , t~cl;L- Fife number ~-(~4 °oj/ Date accepted By L~BZW Tvtai fees 4 ~ . ~ Receipt number ~ _ - J ,!&T-10-02 THU 01:25 PM PAC"rrT GROUP INC FAX N0. 50^ n07 5051 P. WA6 . . . , . _ . . . . _ _ . . _ . . . . t.r L+:~~L~~ii,~~ I - ~ . :i', ~~~.~,'~~i:::i=i ~1 r ~r1j.~:~~ ~.l :1 ~i1 X. I It\' (:lX' P. 1 . . ,i i~•11~. Iti,":~~ ~ _ , :r~, . r, I::i 1 ri,:i C-f •I ':~1 ~ .)I72-121 5 i~.i -lii ii(: f►c't'~.G~' ciC~.;; ~~1•~ It111 I-/ /tI '-Al.ili v:f '.V:01,4 C.'.~.,^tt~~r.ti.~~~ ('.~r~•~. ~u I Iti~~~: (l„~ r~•_•~n~i~~~~~ iitiir.:l[11)\'c; Il:it~`(L l)'t«C:I ~ ' . . . . s . ' . ' . • • ~ ! ] t,BG E`OR REOOI~., s REQM..^T OF ~ . . ► N., . fIlEO 1ME hNIF:N RECOHDEU RMRN TO 9502160259 REO~If •-IIAME: WALDO, ANn SCIIWEDA. P. S. ADnRF~S: :106 North Pinea Road J5 - C1TY. JTATF:. ZIP, Spokane WA 9920ti-4YSv fE/ 03 p 11l 'p Mlt: , . STATU'1'ORY WARRANTY -DEE13POK/A. : • S ` VoL. 16 y ynv 4 3'7 ; TIiF cRUMRS, . GARRY L. DAVIS and KAREN S. DAVIS, hueband and wite ~ ror ana in consSderat ion c,t Ten Dollara ($10.00) and other valuable consideration , ir► hind paid, coaveys and warrancs to 21ST CENTURY.~.~~~~~~~~~ ' the0[ollowing described real estate, sicuated in Che Councy ot Spokane, Stace ot wasnington: That portion of Tract 62 ot OPPORTUNITY as per plat thereof recorded-in Volume "K" ot Plats, Page 20, described as lollows: The Nort,h half of the West halt ot the West halt of said Tract 62; RND the East half of the West half of said Tract 62, and that part of the East halt of said Tract 62 lying West of the West line of Block 2 in Walnut Addition to Opportunity; EXCEPT the North 165 feet thereof; , ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion dedded to the County of Spokane for Broadway Avenue by Dfed recorded under Auditor's File No. 7405060302; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. 80BJBCT TOS Easements, restrictions, reservations, provisions and- agreements of record. . 0095001821 Ex6sz T;Ix Pa!;r, ° d. .~.!.c. o (;OU~~ty T - . l~ 7J'S D„TED: February 14, 1995 . L GARR L. R • t' / • 1'~.-L~_ KAR S. DAVIS STATE OF • WASN•INGTON ) I j ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ~ vn r.h!^ d,y of February, 1995, before me hcr::onal ly appeared Garry L. atiJ riar:r, (:*ivi:,, to me Y.riown !o be the individuals desctibed !n and who e:cecu[ed the within And 'rir,y_, lnq in:trumcnc, and acf;nowledged that they signecl tho same as their free and voluntary 3c= •'r•~d,' for the u:;es arn.l purrioses cherein mentioned. £"1 ~~^-?e; ~ h?r:~. ~n(i rifficia) o:Nal rhe da~• anti y%~at~ last above writt<<►. . ~ L Ilifi,ll Jc ~l = ~ : 1• : tc'1' I). ~t, ,r - ~ ~ ~ . _ ~ - • -~-~-cr~,~~~ _ N6TARY PUBLIC in and for the State of •'"`r WashingCon, Residinq at Spokane ~ ^~:r•;~~.' My Appoincment Expires: 8-15-97 R~C~1V~D SPQ TY. ~ EG QO2 ~ D~VtSIt3N Q~ PLAy NG S~O ft"~~~eD KAlY;~ ~~U14TV 'E'C 16 2002 DIv~~~O'V OF PLANJVINQ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ • ~ SEPA ENVIRONNIENTAI. CxECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST . The State E,nvironmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmenta.l agencies to consider the environmental impaccs of a proposal before making decisions. An enr•iranmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable sionificant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid unpaccs from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help Lhe agency decide whether an EIS is required. IiVSTR UCTIONS FOR APPLJCANTS This environmencal checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use chis checklist to determine whether the environmental impacu or your proposal a.re significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the besc descripcion you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now, may avoid unnecessary delays later. ~ dmark Some questions asx about governmenLai. regulations, such as zoning, snoreline, anci ian desibnations. Answer these quescior. if you ca.~. If you havP probler.^_s, tne gove: nrnent,,? ageacies Can assist you. The checl;.list questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them ove: a period of time or on d.ifferent parcels of land. Attach ariy addicional information thac will help describe your propasal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your anstvers or provide addicional informacion reasonably related co decerminin, if the: e may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROrECT PROPOSALS: Cornplete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be ansa-e: ed "does not apply." IiN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLENIENTAL SHEET FOR NONN -PROJECT ACTIO~S (parc D). For non-project acLions, che references in the checklist to the 'words "project," "applicanc," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively-. Spokane Envi-onmzr.:::: Ordinance Checklist Paze 2 of 21 . J . ~ ' . A. BACKGROUND F1LE/PROJECT No. 1. Name of proposed project, if zpplicable: ~J ~a1St - 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person i -3T? S s3y- 30sY A~ • . 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency reqLesting checl:list: S (A~~• . . ~ 6. Proposed timing, or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): . . Spokane Environmenta? Ordi nance Checklist Page 3 of 21 . ~ . , ~ . • A. BACKGROUND (concinued): 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, eYpansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 0 b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ~ 9. Do you know whether applications are pendin; for governmental approvals of other proposals direczly affecting the propeny covered by your proposal? If yes, eYplain. ~ 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. . S . • ~ V~ S k c"' ~ ~ • . Spokane Environmental Ordi-.~nce Checklist Pa;e 4 of?1 • • ~ ~ ~ . A. BACKGROLTND (continued): 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, includ.ing the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certun aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. o.r c,~J ~ qS M J ~ /Q / u ~ ~ J ~ ~.a._ c~e.~r t..~.~ ~ ~►.r,~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ . ~ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if knon,n. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity mao, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted -with any permit application related to this checklist. , s U S L?s2.1~ . , . 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewe: Se: vice Area? The Priority Sewe: Service Area? The Cicy of Spokane? (See: Spokane Counry's ASA Overlay zone tltlas for boundaries). ~ - Spokane Environmenz.:1 Ordi:__::ce Checklist P:°° : ' . • ' ' Evaluation Fc: - .A'?e:?cv , TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC:',N ~ B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEyIEiN'I'S: 1 EARTH a. General descripcion of the site (circle one flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, _ mountainous, other: ~ . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (appro,cimate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for e:cample, clay, sand, gnvel, peat, muck)? If you know the classificauon of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. : I o^r~ ` ~ ~jo.r~ d. Are there surfzce indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vici.n.iry? If so, describe. ~ . e. Describe the purpose, type and appro:cimaLe quantities of any filling or gradina pro osed. Indicate source of fill. Alc~, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generAy describe. i • . ~ . . . • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): _ g. About what percent of the site will be cove: ed with irnpervious surfaces after pro ject cons ruction (for esam le, asphalti or buildings)? . =ZanNI cx JLUAa-', LLL- - h. Proposed measures to r duce r cont ol erosion, or other impacts o the eart , if any: ~ `~~S 2. AIR a. What rype of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If an-, genera.lly describe and ive appro:cimat~~ tities, if know n. ~ -xy,#" ~ i ~-~►n e~ir~ "r` A'~U Q 11 ~ ~ ~ p.10 G b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect y our proposal? If so, generally describe. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol emissions or other impacts to air, iF any: ~pokane Environmencz? Q;dina-c; Ch:c'.{lis: Pa~e , oi 21 ' t . . • . . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELFIvIEYTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate viciniry of the site (including year-round and seasona] streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? if yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state whac sLream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feec) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ~ 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and avproximate quanciries if known. lsz~ + . 5} Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ~ pokane Environmea:;il Or,,-_:::snce Checklist Pa-e 8 0; ' • ~ . ~ ' Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONiI~IENTAL ELE:tiiENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, des ribe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. --P~v b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground wacer? Give general description, purpose, and appro.cimate quantities if known. ~ ~ 2) Describe waste matzrial thac will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment faciliry. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the svstem(s) are e:cpected to serve. ~v~ " 3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary n aste, inscalled for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor dra.ins). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed or througn the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the systzm inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). ~.i oA- ~ ;pokane Environmentll 0--:r.ance Checklist Pag~ 9 or ? 1 . I , . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EI'TVIRONMENTAL ELE:1~iENfS (Contjnued): 4) Vtlill any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quancities of materials will be stored? 5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in -)b(2) and 36(3)? ~ c. Water Runoff (includ.ing storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and d.isposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Wi11 this water flow into o her waters? If so, describe. 2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwacer or to a storm water disposal system dischargw surface or groundtvater? 3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface warers' If so, generally describe. Spo;:ane Environmencal OrClia:.r:cf! Checklist P1;° 10 OI ? 1 • ' ~ I - . I Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. Ei1'VIRONMENTAL EL .FYi IEiYfS (Condnucd): . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aauifer Sensitive Area be especially clcar on explanations relating to facilities concerni.ng Sections 36(4), 36(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). QA- &ALAk tl I h.i 4. PL ALNr's a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: A'-*'deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other te" evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other if-'shrubs ~ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buaercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, - other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation What kind ama, 3.mou1 - of vegetazioz will be removcd c: a.Lic:;d? - ~\OL~ Jcmcas', ~ .Q c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ~ d. Proposed lsndscaping, use of native plants, or other meaSUr s to preserv o: en rce vegetation on the site, iE any: t" ~ tt - ~ . ~ Spokane Environmentzl Ordin-7::ce Chec;list Page 1 1 of ? 1 i . . . • ~ Evaluation For Agency Use On1y B. ETSIVIRONMEN'I'AL ELEMF.Ml'S (Continued): 5. ANIh1ALS a. Circle any birds and anunals a hich have been obse: ved on or near the site or are known to be on or near che siLe: , birds: hawk, heron, eagle, s ~ribird, other: , mamm~►ls: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herriri?, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known co be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migracio❑ route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~ 6. ENERGY AND NATLT.kL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heatina, manufacturing, e c. ~ ne" . ~ b. NVould youc projzct affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ~ Spokane Environrnenta? O: din--t::ce Checklist Pacre 12 o~ ? i . 1 • i a ~ I Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. _ EiNVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. What kinds of energy conservation features zre included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed me res to reduce control energy impacts, if any: ~ If% r% ~A- 7. ENVIROMMENTAL HE.UTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including eYposure to to.cic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, thaL could occur as a,result of this proposal? If so, describe. kyQ~ 1) Describe special emerjenry services that might be required. Proposed measu: es to reduce or concrol enviror..::e^ca? health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for examFle: traffic, equip ent, operation, othe:)? kQ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated zvich the project on a short-term or a lon~ term ba~sis (for esample: traffic, construction, ope: ation, n%ould comq f om che site. other)? Indicate - at q _ ~ ~~1~ • 4 r] d' o\ . • ~L~ S okane Environmznta ' ~ p 1 Ordinance Checklisc Pao~e 13 ot ? 1 . ! I . , . , . Evaluatian For Agtncy Use Onlv ; B. ENVIRONi1~IEI'+1TAL ELF.~~+~£NT5 (Continurd): 3} Proposed measure to reduce or,control noise impacts, if any. ~ 4 8, LAND AND SHOR,ELINE LISE - a. What is the curr ru use af the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used fvr agriculture? If sa, deseribe. ~ c. Deseribe any scrucnures on the site. . . Y- d. Will any stru tures be dem Iished? If s, which? ~ px~l e. W hat is tlle current zorung classificativn of the site? s Spvkane Environmental Oruir..:::ce Checti.315i Pa,;e 14 o i 21 . ' Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EITVIRONMENTAL ELEMEi1TS (Continued): . . f. • What 's the current C,. omprehensive Plan designauon of the site? ~ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area) If so, specify. kb i. Ap ro~cimately ho~v many eople wild reside or w rk in the mpleted project? ~ ~ LAla,a~~" a11n Ci C~.Q~ j. Approximately how many people would the compleced project disp'ace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impaccs, if any: ts,3 p, . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected ~ ~ land uses and plans, if anv: Lxzlkl A~...~ ' ~ P Spoksne En~~ironniencal Or~insrice Checklisc ~~e 1~ o` ~ 1 . 1 ~ ' . : ' • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEYtS (Contlnucd): 9. HOUSING a. Approsimately hon many units would'be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, - middle, or low-income housing. atQz ~ 4 ~ LY s~ 51 , ~ Civ, ` vJ b. Approximately how masiy uniu, if zny, would be elimin2ted3 Indicate whether high, middle, or ~ low-inco~e ho ing. ~ , ~ , Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: F~ - !Q. A .ESTxE11C:5._ . . . i. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal e.-cteri r building material(s) proposed? _ 1'~ 4m 4: , What views in the immediate viciniry would be altered or obstructed? . Pro osed measures to reduce or control aesthetic irnpacts if any: , pokane EnvironmenE:.l Or:::::z:-,ce Checklist Page 16 of ? 1 . ' Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELENIEMS (Coatinued): 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What rype of light or glare will the proposal produce% What time of day would it main (An ly occur? v.l.►N b. Could light or glare from the finished project be z safety hazard or interfere wich views? What ejciin off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 3. Prooosed measures- tu Jeduce- or.coatcol ight ndglare i pa-t.;, if anv:. . 1 . 12. RECRFr1TION 1. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate viciniry? D. Would the roposed project displace any existing recreacional uses? If so, describe. 3pokane Environmental Oruinance Checklisc Page 17 0; • . : a • Evaluation For Aaency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEi1JLN'TS (Continued): Proposed rrieasures to reduce or concrol impacu on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicanc, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURU PRESERVATION 1. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. .~sl • D. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of hisLOric, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or ne:ct to the site. ~st, Propcsed r.^,easu: es tc reduce o; control impacts, if a.zy: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving che site and describe proposed access to the existing stree: system. Show on site plans, if any. CYMOLK ~ t' Q1 Q 10.~ ~~vt. Cgh~Q Q 1~v► ~ b. Is site currently ser-ved by public transit? If not, what is the approXimate distance to the nearest transic nop? ~ Spokane Environmental Ordinanc° Checklist Page 18 of 21 I I 4 . ► ~ - , Ewaluatian For Agency Use 4nly B. ENVIR.C7IVNIENTAL E1.FNJEWS (Continued): c. How many parking spaces w~ould the carupleted praject have? Haw many would che pra'ect eliminace? bx+k' OL ~ I . c &Lv r~l I - - d. WiIl the propflsal require any new roads or screer.s, vr improvements to e.cisting raads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally descri6e (indicate whether public vr private). . e. WiII the pro}ec€ use (or occur in €he imamediate vicinity vo water, rail, or air transpozzation? If so, generally describe. How m.any. vehicular. ..trips per day-wvuld be.generated by r.he cornFlerecl p r,?jecx?. If known indicaEe ,w hen pea. volumes would occur. r►.,.~..:~ ~ ~ ~ tA C-NS , Proposed mea ures t reduce or control trans ortation impacts, if any: ` 5. I'U'BLTC SER.4ZCE5 Would the project resulc in an irzcreased need for publie services (for esa,mple: fire protection, palice protection, health care, schools, other)? If sa, generally describe. )akane Enviranmental Qrdir.ance Checklist Paae 19 or 21 r y • ~ EYalU8L1oFl Foi ' Agency Use Onty B. ETMRONMENTAL EI E~'wiEN7S (Coatinucd): b. Propvsed measures to reduce or con'trol direct impacu on public services, if a,ny. 16. U`tILITIES _ a. Circle utilitie cur.rent ~ able at the site: ~etrici , atural , ate e e se te~ephc~n~ anitary se~ave septi~c system, vt er. , b. Describe the utilities that are prQposed far the project, the utilicy prvviding the , seruice, and the general canstructivn activities on the site or i.n the immediate vicina.ry which might be eede An. . . C. SYGNATUtE . I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above respvnses are made truthfully and to the best of my knawledge. I 21so undersTand Lhat, should there be any willful misrepresentatic~n or wallful lack of full disclosure on na.y part, the agencv may withdraw any determinatiQn vf nfln-sign.i.ficance that ic might issue in reliance upan this check.list. Date: ~ I ~ -QL-- Propanent. : P Progonent: CaSt tyDe o'C pTIi3t) (Sibltature) Address: zxi qz-s ~v'~-~ City, S tate, Zip: IN Phone: 5,z' 5 d Person compietino, the fvrrn: c,~~~,~ ,•..S?~.`~ Date: Phone: 5pokane Enviranmental C)rdinance CheeMist Pa~e 20 +~F? 1 , * . FOR STAFF U5E C)1'tiTTI.Y Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checkiist: . $ased on this staff review vf the enviranmental checklist arid axher gentinent infarmation, the staff: A. Concludes thac there are nv prabable significant adverse iinpacu and recomim,ends a _ deterrninacion of nonsignificance PNS}. B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacrs da exist, for the current proposal and recanumends z rnicigated determination of nonsignificance with condstians (+viDNS). G. Cc►ncludes that there are probable significanz adverse envirQnmeutal impacts aad reeommends a determ.ination of sigrufieance P5}. . REFER 7C? FEE SCHEI7ULE FQA F"ILIiN!G FE£ Spokane Envirortmeratal Urdinanee Cheeklist Page 21 of 21 SPOKANE COUNTYDIVISION OF BUILDING . AND CODEENFORCEMENT ~ 1026WEST BROADWAY AYENUE • SPOxAvE, WA 99260-0050 ~ Site Information Project Information ~ Site Address: 0 E ADDRESS UNKNOWN AVE Project Number: 02011075 Inv: 1 Issue Date: 12/16/02 SPOKANE, WA 00000 Permit Use: ZE-21-02 Parcel Number: 45172.1215 Subdivision: i7NKNOWN AppGcant: WALLS CONSTRUCTION CORP. Block: Lot: 137 S HOWE ST Zoning: UNK Unknown SPOKANE, WA. 99212 Phone: (509) 534-3058 Contact: WALLS CONSTRUCTION CORP. Owner: 21 ST CENTURY L.L.C. 137 S HOWE ST Address: 818 W RIVERSIDE AVE #530 SPOKANE, WA. 99212 Phone: (509) 534-3058 SPOKANE, WA 99201-0910 Setbacks - Front: Left: Rig6t: Rear: Building Inspector: DAN HOWARD Water Dist: Group Name: Project Name: ~ Permits ~ Zone Change Contractor: License ENGiNEERS REVIEW $200.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $75.00 REZONE:RS,UR7,UR12,UR22 3 $1,543.00 PRE-APP CONFERENCE $60.00 UTILITIES REVIEW 5100.00 Total PermiE Fee: $1,978.00 ~ Payment Summary ~ Total Fees AmountPaid AmountOwing Tran Date Recei tp~# Pavment Amt $1,978.00 $1,978.00 $0.00 12/16/02 9906 $1,978.00 Prncessed By: Ramey, Kathleen PERMIT Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA Page 1 of 1 NOTICE It is the responsibility of the applicanVpermittee, not Spokane CcS'unty, to+gee•tti itrthat the use described on the front of this permit complies with appficable codes and requirements and that required inspections are requested. Failure to request required inspections and obtain the necegsary approvals prior to progressing beyond the point where inspections are requfred may necessitate removal of certain parts of the construction at the ~ applicanYs/permittee's or property owner's expense. At a minimum, the following inspections ARE REQUIRED by County Code: 1. FOOTING - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete-all structures, including manufactured homes. NOTE: This inapection includes review of the structure's setbacks irom property Ilnes. Minimum setbacks are established by County zoning regulaaons. Typically, side and rear yard setbacks are measured from property lines, while setbacks for yards abutting streets are measured from the property line or the center line of the roadway right-of-way, whichever provides the greater setback from the center line of the roadway right-of- way. Curb lines and fence lines are not necessarily indicative of property lines. In some residential areas, the County can own as much as 20 feet of right-of-way between your property and the actual improved streeUcurb. The responsibility to comply with applicable setback provisions lies solely with the permittee-neither Spokane County nor its authorized representatives assume any responsibility for the verification or locabon of your property lines. Pleass verify their location prior to locating your structure. Failure to properly locate the structure may require its relocation at the owner's/permittee's expense. 2. FOUNDATION - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete. 3. FRAMING - after all framing, bracing and blocking is in place, and prior to concealing. 4. INSULATION - prior to the installation of drywall. 5. PLUMBING - after rough-in, before covering, and final. - 6. MECHANICAL - rough-in of piping, before covering, metal chimneys before concealment, and final. 7. FINAL - when complete and prior to occupancy and/or use. Please provide 24 hours notice. AJ,j permfts require final lnspection. NOTE: In addition to inspection of the structure, this inspection includes revlew of alte improvementa (typically depicted on the approved site plan) required by ordinance or as a condition of approval of this permit. Items such as the installation of tire hydrents, tire department access, on-:Ita dralnage ("208 swales"), road Improvements, parking, and IandscAping are common requirements of a permiUsite plan which must be com- pleted prior to final approval of a building or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 8. MANUFACTURED HOMES - Final inspection required when complete, stairs, handrails, skirting, etc. installed, and prior to occupancy; completed inspection record card must be available on site. 9. SEWERS - prior to cover 10. RIGHT-OF-WAY/APPROACH - prior to placement of concrete, or, if gravel approach, after completion. In addition to the above, any plumbing or mechanical systems or material which would be concealed by framing, drywall, concrete, etc., must be inspected prior to cover. Check with the department for "special inspectfons" in conjunction with commercial projects.FOR INSPECTIONS: TO INSURE PROMPT SERVICE, PLEASE GIVE ONE WORKING DAY/24 HOUR NOTICE . PARTS OF YOUR PROJECT MAY REQUIRE PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS FROM MORE THAN ONE AGENCY. • Bullding, plumbing, mechanical and fire inspections, Division • Road cuts for utilitiea or driveways, Division of Engineering & of Building and Code Enforcement Roade - 48•HOUR NOTICE REGIUIREO 477-3676 477-3600 or State Department of Transportation • Conatruction in a flood plain, Division of Engfneering & Roads 456-3000 477-3600 • Sewer connection, Division of Utilities ' Electrical wiring, State Department of Labor and Industries 477-3604 324-2640 0r City Public Worics Department 62b-6300 • On-site waste disposat system, Spokane Reglonal Health Distdct 324-1560 PERMIT EXPIRATION AND REFUNDS Unlese othervvise noted, this peRnit wfll be considered null and void by limitation if the work authodzed by the permit is not commenced or is stopped for a period of 180 days, unless a written request for an extension of the permit (s recelved and approved by the Building Official prfor to expiration. At e minimum an inspecdon should be requested at least once every 180 days to assure the validity of the permit. A permit may be renewed withln one year of the date of expiration for one-half the odginal fee, subject to certain IlmftaGons-please call us if you have any questions. All refund requesta must be made in writlng by the applicanUpermittee (shown on the reverse) no later than 180 days aftsr the date ot tee paymsnt. Refunds of not more than 80% of the permit fee paid may be authorized when no work has been done under the permit. No refunds may be authorized more than 180 days after fee payment. MISTAKE? If you think we've made an error in processing this permit or in conducting inspections pertaining to it, or find erroneous information in the permit, please bring it to our attention immediately by filing a written request for correction within 10 working days of discovery. All such requests should be directed to the Dlvision of Building and Code Enforcement at the below address. Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 477-3675 Fax: (509) 477-4703 TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ ' Spokane Co unty Public Works Department Division of Building & Code Enforcement Receipt Receipt N'rumcer: 99o (D- Crrs turrter .1"11111her ProjErts Full Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owing PAID Pmt 02011075 1 $1,978.00 $1,978.00 $1,978.00 $1,978.00 ~ Total: $1,978.00 $1,978.00 $1,978.00 $1,978.00 Miscellaneous Items Tota! PAID: $1, 978. 00 Tender T ffle Check Acct Balance CC Nbr Exp Date TENDERED VI SA xxxxxxxxxxxx3631 03/2004 1,978.00 Payer: Total TENDERED: 1,978.00 Over / (Short) $0.00 Change $0.00 Notes: Tran Date / Time: 12/16/02 9:11:37 AM By: KCumming Logoa User: gwendel Station: GWENDEL Override By: ' Printed: 12116102 9:11: 38 AM Page 1 oj 1 Z&21-V2 1licinity aMap ~ ~ - - ~ ~ $ ~ QnAard w►tst' Q~ a ~ << 0 ~ ~ --E --69*k- • ~ *t ' ~ ~ CL ~ 6 - ~ ~ 13 *aPeIW 3id J ~ ~ XL 19 v` ~am ~ r . - F . 4roR Vwd 24 na ~ raa ~ ? r) ~ _ 25 30 ~ - , s~ale: 1 incr, _ 2083 ft (rounded) 1211 ar02 Mar4ryNbp TECHNICAL REVIEW iVIEETING SPUKANE C'aUNTY DMSIUN UF PLANNING Date: I]epartment: Department Contact Fersan: Actian: Znne reclassificatian from Urban Residential-3.5 (i TR-3.S) to Urban Residential- 7(UR-7) an appraximately 2.423 for those uses allowed in the UR-7 zone. ) TECHNICAL REVIEVV MEETING: JANUARY 2, 2003 @ 1:15 P.M. N ote; The fvllvwing infQrmation is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing vf public hearing items heard befvre the Hearing Examiner. The fallawing infvrmation dves nat provide a complete or binding final review of the prvpasal. This will Qecur only after the propasal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The function af this meeting is to provide a preliminarv review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsar and other departments af what to expect as standard development canditivns and design recommendations. The commrents received are based an a preliminary review of the application fvrm and site plan by the Departnaents and Agencies which have been circulated the information (nvt aIl agenciesldepartments have been cantacted--only thase who haVe been determined to have primany in#earest. 1. a. Does the application (or can the develvpment) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hea,ring Agenda? ~ YES ❑ NO b. Tf no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedu.le: Hearings be#'ore the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Cflnditions of Appraval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditivns if necessary) , . Parcel: 45172.1216 Owner: 21ST CENTURY L.L.C. CoOwner: Owner Address 818 W RIVERSIDE AVE #530 SPOKANE WA 99201-0910 USA ~ T 1 ITI Site Address 9311 E BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE ~ ~ J Legal Description OPPORTUNITY PT OF B62 EXC N165FT OF;E112 OF W112 b STP E _ ~ ~ 2 OF&ADJ & W OF WALNUT ~ i ADD ~ _ , tr~d _ i - ~ ~I~~~ ► ~ i n 41, Ik ~ - I TT-TA F-T~ _T--~-~ ~ ' Notice; This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. Il is intended for reference use only. legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency. . ~ 7~,. ~ ~41 ~~t~,~(~,o-~ee.Ccr MI'~SION 'YEI`IUE 3 AD No. 61 W' fi0 M ~ os ~ I a•~ i 0'~ K 7 ~ 1 18 t,, o' w Zce . :y, . 0 lb 14 n u 19 TO 15. 14. yre m ,-~s:.s ~ cwv a e-A, ~ Z'R 1 I ~ ~ • ~ 22IS ~ 14 I in ~ ~ o N a ~ U '~~i • ' ~ rP 24 ZT 7 I G 1s 11 JTN-a~ A' V I Cl-roV.Y ut. c~v !F4 = ws. ~ ~ ~t,i I' 1 into Ave. ! 10 I I~ 10 115 1 ,yI ~ G I S 16I 14 ISI Id Z c~[ ~17 ~ ~ 1 G IT 16 ~ IT ~ rt}'' J ~.f ~s 22, ~ ~e• ,ti~ J ' 1p + 10 f 1~•~ G'' J l~M R 'J Q •?j l~t.r - - M' ~e~ • ~ I ~ 13 14 IS I:7 IT IG~9 14 1~ tl y .'x~ ` E. pROAD NC 141 - 12, 121arw E~ 1~C, -SO' O~s.MG~ff1A Q i 4'~ i ~ \ I 2 L I i~ S Z 1 r+ ~ ~ G b ~ S i ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ • p i ` J ~ / _ 4 r} ~ ~ ~ ' C 56. ~ + ~ p 4 A' N ~ • ~ _ f S ~i ~ ,`i•. n d : io 6 ~ ! o0 7 . 0 I • ~ . • ~ ~ 7 k x p 1 • e ~L CATA Rr• r~-•f . M7 R1 2 e•30' W/'':'1 ^ Q - 1 d~ ~ ~~y C •'w . ~ .e. i'` w`~ ~ 0 Q ~ 4 ! 4 ~ i ~ • _ -,~1 ~"•~a~- 6 + 63 ^ .o T _ ..1 ~ " • ' 65. ' ~r d`, ,•j _.tes.~-!IU • • • ~~~i■ ~/~+V+~ ~++sN l• '~r-~--~+~ r • . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,p ;,,4 a 7 ro !51 s ~ , I ~ ! I J -i +~,r=- ~ , t Al~~,. w.' ~ f•'~`.i i~\ i 1 ~ •.l ~ ~ 3' ~ • . . ~ ~ . .;s .t'r'~ - - ~ ,~r► _ ` ' ~ _ - ~ r ~'`r `e" ~4AL .1 ~Z `•„~.~~e r: - f{.~ a'•.~ ~ F~ f,' ~ °A • y~L ~ S• ~ ~ . ~ ~ , N ' ~ ~ + ` ~ i 1~ ~f i~• ~ T 4' 4. ~ ~ . ~ , i.~ • 1~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ,f . i s~ '.r' 1 ~ f ~ 's' ~ ~:'t+. i`• ~ .,y ~QV'• Mt: r. ,k„ ~ M'~ ~ , t'~ t;i 1 r'y- ~•a g "J4. ~ ~ ~ i'f , ~ r r~ _ ~ a..: e~r'~i►. ~ , ~ ~ . i ~ ass .~a r ;t ` ` ;r.~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ , t ~ ~ . , • . , s~ . • t+ ~ ~ _ i i. ww F j ' ~ • ' _ '+1i ~fl':: N~ ~ j~._- .r' r 1 y , ` a ~ ~r_ 1 ~ ~ ! ~ z,,.•.; . r'*' ~ _ ~ ~ , , ~ : ~96 T , ~ . ~ • i.i ' - ~ ~ rr • - k ~ 1 e`'` ~ s ~ , > • ~ ~ • ~ ' ~t ~ a , • . F " . . : , it .j'' 'y t • ~ ` '`o ~ ~ . ~ . ~ _i.1.~~• ` ' l u• ~~T ` ' . ~ ~ , ~►,w r 5 ? ~ ~ ~5 1 ~ai';,. ,r , i - ,M , i * . , j . v . ~ `-i ~j t:, = r¢ s ~ ~ . * ~,t, ~J ~ . i ~5,~ • ~r ~ . ~ . • y~ ~ = ~ .r w'T +f" .Y- ` 1.....i+- ~ x ' ~ a ~ r y s~= gy , 4 , . / 7~ /~S "...s . : y ` ~ - ~ ' ~ ~f 1 ~i IY~ 9 . • . . Jf~ ~ ,wj_ I~~~ ~ ,a ~'~s„r ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ..s ~ +l~.,~s; ' f,~d... 5~~~ _ _~Y~•~ r • • fi r i. ~1~.' ~ .°5, a ~ j - - ~r,; : r ,..c7C~►-~~ , ~ ~ ~ .c7C ° t,.~ ~ , s t ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~I 4 J ~ t ~r ~ e ~ 1 l ~ ~y ~ _ • ~Y~ ~ ~ 4rmOt10 , } ~ ~ / R w. . . ~ ~ :E I 4 , r~ ~ I ~ r ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ . , I y t 1 ~ d - M Se ~~c, - ~ ~ ~ P I Q , ~ ~ a~I4n ~ ~ ~ ~ . info m ~.4 , ~ { ; u f t C ~ ~ ~ `'"l / r~"~ ~a , 'a 9317 ~ ~ ~ 4Q5 ~ ~ ; 9 94~9 ~ ~ ~B L J ' r ~ , 9409 44y r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~g r , ~ ~ 93a3 o ~ ..f L~J ~ ~ _ FB ~ , r-. , - . . I ~B , . ~ ~ . ~ ~'--t ~ ~ ~ I ~ .r- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ f f t. ~ ~ T ' ! ~ , ~ ~ , ~ i )F ~ ~z~~ , 1 ~ ~ ~ I I ~ J ~ , : ti ~ ` r ' ~ ~ 1 N 8 FB r.,,~,,,, r i I;~ c ' ;~d ~ i "~'~"•~`1 a / C , ~ a Q r U ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ r i ~ ~ .t ~ ~ J/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ti: I J I ~ ~ ~ f rti ~ ~ ' ~y,~ ~ r ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ '°,e-,'~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ` 0 C) i ~~C ~e.. r , I ~ . t, ~ i 1 J ~ i , u c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ' - ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1 - . . . . . . 3 ~i~.~, : , : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~..r ~ J . . . . ~ ~ ~ ` c~ . ~ . . . ~ _ ~ { . . ~ . .r . . . . . . . ~ . I .....~.~r.., . . . ~ ~ . . t~,... ...i..,.........,. ~ . _ . _ , . . , . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SS:-- . . : . , . . . . : : . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . . . , . . . . a 1 _ . . . , 1~ . . .....4~........, ~ , ~ . . . ~ . .~n.. . . . . . . ..r,~ . ~ . . _ ,1. . . . . . ~ o~,....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . , ~i ~ ~ . ~ . ~ .~~..,...~.~~~+n.~ '„""''_..~'.-r-r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r~ . . . . . ~_~~5 . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . , w . . . . . . . . . . . . . t. . . . . . . . ~ ~ . , . . . . . ~T . : .~t': .:~C'.-- . . . . . . . . . . , ~ . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , • p ~I ' . . . . rt i:.'. . . . . . .~,-r. . ~i . . . . . .~--.J.'.LT . . . . . . . . . , . . , . •~'r". .r.:.. • . ~ . , . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ~ . . . . . j 1 . . . ~ r. *t , r~n ^~'n . .Y.. , r+'~'. . ~ . • " ~ . •.i,.~ , . ~ ..:~~~1,-~:~ . . i . . . . i ~a• • •~r' fL, .°L~:"~.°' ~ ' ~..~-~..{^i~."..,. 1~ , . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ~ . . . , . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ~,y. ~ ~~6. . '~r~ .i~~`, ~ ~ r.t. . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L • • ~r~• ~ ~ _ , ~ . . ~ y~,~ ~ . ...~j'.'U , . ~~,~~1'Y~~ ~t ~ . ~ . . 4 f~,,.` . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . • '`~~1 ~x r!w. . . . . . . - . . . ~ r . . . . . . . , , . ~ x + , ~ "`a / Y~=.~-.~ ~ I l.. ~.Y-- . . ..rF , " . 2"1 'A' . . . ~.oes~ - . . • ~1, . . =cv--+,,. ' 4 ~ v^ ~iw~ . . , ~ ' lJ _ ~ I . ~ ~ , ~ ~j~ . . ~'j'. i . L) ? ~ ~ ` b. _ ~ ~ . y~ ~ ~ `'1'~ ~ v~~"^ 'hl-. - ti ~ E 1 ~ f ~ ° f b ~ y ' ~ ~~'2 } .f 0 r ] ~a ~ ~ I ~ I j ~ ! -~,r+ ~.~.'~CV.~. , ti~ ~ r, ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ . J ti ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' „ ~ ~ (U ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~w~ ~ ~ ~ , ( ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ r ~ 4.. . ~ ~.Ur~~ r ~ ~ , , j . ; f ~ ~ , ~ , ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ a I ~ r~n I ~ ~,1 ~ ~ } . . . ~ C ~ 1 n ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~r L!~ 1.~ ~~4U ~V~ 1 g3 ~ 9 ~ I ~ ] Il ~ 9410 FB ~ ~ ~ - 93~4 Z t t ~ ' f M1._.. ^ ` ~ ~V~~ t~ ~I 1 1 ~8 FB ~ ~ ~B { , ~ ~ , I ' 9 Z14 . r~ , t, , . 1 a ~ F~ ~ ~ 1 i I ~2 , W c ~ 208 92 r"'.... I ~ ~ ~ FB . . . 1 , . L ~ ~ ~ FB ~ . ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ F8 J , t ~ r ~ f d ~ . . ~ . . . . . r i - ~ r-- , ~ ~ , • . NO Septl , ~~J r ~ , . i.. ~ ~~J ~ ~ No Se tic, ~ ~ ~ e t~c, t P r I ne No ~p ~ c~r D y ~ ~ ~ , . L . ~ F e~tc > 4 ~ ' o S , r~ ir~e ,syy~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ e ~ i ~ ~ ~ . or a y~ ~ ~ i `t r V 1. 4 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ` t I "I ~ 1 . . ~ ~ ~ t'"~ tn ~ ~ r 1' ! 0 . ~ , a~ on . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~nformat s . 4nf rm ti fo~an , ~ ~ r t ~e ~w . . . ; ~a~o~. Gar~ r ~!v p 4 , . - , ~nfiar ~~,found r r. f ou nd . ~ , . l ~ , ~ ar Dryii ~ ! --~~"o n ~w ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ 4~ ~ 1 ~ `~t~~. ~ ~ . . . ~ , ; ( , ~ ~~forma~in ~ , , r~ ~ ST~ ~ ~ ' STA , I ~ STA STA `~,~d _ ~ ~.E. ~ ~ , . . ~ . STA ?.B . ~ ~ STA I.E. 198 7 ~ 3 } ~~a~. I.E. 1983.6 ~ I.E~ 1983.7 ~ 5 38 r I ~ 984.5 L.F. 4~ 1.E. 1 N 40 ~ L,F. 4 SS 20 SS 44 45 38 L, F. 4" S5 ~ 45173.0420 TA 40 L.F. 4 5 S w L.F. 4 S5 45173.~4a s~a ~ os ~ ~~.a4 1988.0 • 17 4~173.Q4a8 I['1Q 7 I,E. Q 3.0407 •L. 1 ~7~s l ~ ~ T~ 1 ~ 4 SS 39 l.. 40 f ~ L.F. 4 SS 39 45173.0508 ~ 5173.0527 4 SE~E ~ T 5Q HE~ S NG ~ Z~Ive5 ~ '.80 - ~ 34 0") e~ ~ _ ~ti ~.68 ~ . • ' • ' • CC~ CONSTRUCT4 JN NOTES c'. . i . ~ : ~ ' ~ • : ~ : : • ` ~ RE , . . . ~ 1 ~ REMC►VE ExISTl4~G QRA ~ ; ~ : ~ : . ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ ; . ~ . . S. ~ ~ .T~ . . . S~P ARA: To.R. (SEE pE • : • ~ . ~ : ~ : ~ , ~ . . , C CONNEC-r TO CATGH E . , : ~ • ~ : ~ : • ~ : ~ . . , :~y ~ . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ - . . N , , , . , . + . , . . ,(V . , . . ~ . t3? . _ . . n cV . . . • • ~ - ~