Loading...
ZE-48-86 . ►~.~~i I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROAOWAV CENTRE BUIl01NG N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 2205 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 a ~ SpOKANC COUNTY GOURT NOUSC SPOKANE COUNTY H EARIN G EX AMIN ER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND Q,RDER, A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on February 4, 1988, and the members of the Committee present being Jim Schurra, Chairman, and Ron Odell Phillip D Hanis withdrew because of a possible conflict of interest B PROPOSAL The sponsor, Charles E Simpson, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No ZE-48-86, Agricultural to Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone, for the purpose of retail and continued residential use Also, for a variance, File No VE-112-87, to allow a Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone to be located approximately 160 feet from another B-1 Zone whereas Section 6 24 310 of the Zoning Code requires a separation of at least 2,640 feet between B-1 Zones C FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is single family residences, apartments store engineering/surveying office and vacant 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for MAJOR COMMERCIAL development 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4 That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Determination of Non-S ignificance S That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled 6 That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 1 . - C FINDINGS OF FACT ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 7 That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified 8 That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area 9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use 10 The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare 11 The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee a) That due to the uniqueness of the site and the fact that it has a preexisting use as non-conforming, the Hearing Examiner Committee does hereby direct the Zoning Administrator to use some flexibility in implementing the Neighborhood Business (B-1) standards as stated in Planning Condition #7 b) That the Hearing Examiner Committee concurs with the "Planning Summary" statements regarding the appropriateness of the zone change and variance request D('ONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (All Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors ) a) COU N TY PLAN N IN G DEPARTMEN T Standard 1 Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 2 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisians for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired 3 The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 2 . ~ D('ONDITIONS OR CONTIIVGENCIES ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 All current standards of the Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this s ite 5 That the present proposal is not detailed enough to determine whether or not the use of or materials stored on the site are in compliance with Chapter 4 16A (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) of the SP4KANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE Accordingly, as a condiuon of approval, the sponsor/applicant shall be required to file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public" which shali provide in material as follows PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY USE ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 4 16A (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE) THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS NUTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DES CRIBED AS FOLLOWS " 6 Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Ptatting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits S peci al 7 That the portion of the site devoted to business uses shall comply with the Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone standards no later than May 15, 1988 T6e remainder of the site shall comply at the time the existing use change to a B-1 use This condition shall provide some discretion to the Zoning Administrator but at a minimum shall include five (5) feet of landscaping along Argonne, paved parking and sign compliance 8 Applicant shall comply with ' 208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff This may be phased as required in Condition #7 above b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Pnor To The Issuance Of A Buildine Permit Or Use Of The Proaertv As Proaosed S tandard 1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road S ystem shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer 3 . ~ D C'ONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans 3 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Disuici a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or any portion thereof, if the development is to be phased 4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 5 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 6 All required improvemeots shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer AlI work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer S pecial 10 Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Cataldo and a 20 foot radius on Argonne and Cataldo 4 D CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 11 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Access Street standard for the improvement of Cataldo Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximatcly 10 to 12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbing and sidewalks must also be constructed c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Standard 1 Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80- 0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District 2 The Owner(s) or S uccessor(s) in Ynterest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s) property PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94 3 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County as amended S pecial 4*Each new structure or change in occupancy shall be double plumbed for connection for future area-wide collection systems *Only applies if modifying existing sewer system d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT S tandard 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 5 D CONDITIONS OR CONTINCENCIES ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services 4 Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage system may be authorized 5 Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT S tandard 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 No change shall be made in the character of occupancies or use of any building which would place the building in a different division of the same group of occupancy or in a different group of occupancies, without first obtaining a change in use permit from the Department of Building and S afety S pecial 3 A building permit was issued on October 28, 1985, for interior remodeling of the grocery store Proper inspections have been made f) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Water Purveyor is Hutchinson Irrigation District #16, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY All air nolludon reeulations must be met This includes but is not limited to the followin e 1 Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities 6 D ONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTRUL AUTHORITY 2 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces 3 All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean 4 SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV addresses emission standards All emission standards must be met 5 Demolition and renovation projects must coraply with the requirements of CFR 40 Part 61, Subpart M Intent to Demolish and Renovate forms are available at the S CAPCA office 7 • QgD-Eg ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 The Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Charles E Simpson for a zone reclassification and variance as described in the application should be APPROVED to the Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone Motion by Ron Odell Seconded by Jim Schurra Vote (2-0) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (B-1) ZONE UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST Mr Phillip D Harns withdrew due to a possible conflict of interest HEARING EXAMINER COM?Vi=E HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE 17 Ch#fma - ATTEST For WALLIS D HUBBARD Planning Director By TEVE HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator Date 8 . ; 'r. ~A ~ GORN CT o ti . _1 ' ' ~ • ~ .r~- ' . ► ` ` ~ r&' .•~..'~.^r-:.. ► ~ I C K ~ AL VISTA jc - . - ~ y,.~, ► , ~ ,0 ° ~ , • i . N , . EtS~iE 0 A = ~ ~ ty~ P. RG E. 4 T ~ , ~i . ho ; 10 : ~L14R61. IT[ 0 TC < 4AWtiH apAp % ~ . . aRGOr I ~ ~1~ . , /~RGONN I"J L ^-r, ~ ULLA4 q0+0 9E,94 N" y MULLAN ROAp 00 1 R OA D 'N Z 00 • ~ ~ rn ~ pc ~ z L u I, LOCu 7 Q ~ b4CIN4 , D A n ~ A ROA ~A o. ~ r ~ • ~ ►~~R L jy,SCC'Tor -on 4- 1 9Choo~ ~c unotq► , I IN[N OILkm J ~ Q t r} ~ I ~11U/7 T._r ~ NOAp~ ~ ' _..•r 1 ~...o ( RUAO ''NaLNuT Rp 0 ► ~ t I h ( . ( r }li ~ O • ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r.. > RpAD ~ ~ J L. A'r H l. u c~ r-+v ~ i v v~ _ • _ - - ~ , ' O N . Qe~~►t~ Pole J , . I+ ' ~ r ~ . n7 1_ Fn~. V+rd~...~ 1 ( i ;--~y . ~ a I- . ~ I • , to i 4 - I el ~ ~ ' ~ ~ O W~~Y Ctna• ~ ~ r PDfa! c r Pe't L S 0~'~ ~v ~ -F' o ~ ~ • ` ~ ~ ~ u 3~ ~r ~ N tn ~ T~kp ti~.. ; -LZ ~ 0 l 0 o. • I I GM~.w L~w~L ~ 'V np( ~ CxV1kiw~l&aC T•P ~ µ/aAc'f~IEttr 10 ~ ( I ~ ° . ' i lil l ~~~eas . . ~l La Z N~ a l~ of , I 954-" , _ ! „ ~ ~ I at 1 ~ I . 1 PROP`RTY DESCRI PT1oN The- Eas~ 100 ~~e+ of fhe. tvor+h '/Z Lo+ I 8lock IG E C E I V E _ Hu+chinson's Addi4or.%; Spokane, Courr~, Vyashing+on. ExCQ.p-A% +hQ.+ Portiocl convcyc8 to Spokane. C,oun-~ far DECi 10 1987 Argonn~ Roa.d SPOrunE c;WntY _ -,,,.PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 .s.. , • ~ ~ . '~1 N .~1.r9/87P ' • NOu ••Ti i.` . . . N. 919 ~ CLA.s~~Et-_ N. 909 48- . -86 V}W~t V 112 87 . Qtiltl'YN E~ . - , (:KCH£D B*Y . . . , . . ..i,.. . ~ • - - 97-82 C_~~ `,zp ~ ~ t s~-- --g 14 p . ~ • , D G g ; ~ ~ ! O ~ . -05 c . ; ~ ~ z - ' - - ra~ , ~ ~ ~ 7 i , ~T - ~ a ~ ~ ° ~ • ~ t ~B RO AZ21 0 • A t. t~ sr r• l.a Irr -tLS-4W-a..u~-t •'.w--~3'~------ f 143-73C ~ ~ ~ ~ • a ; ~ ~ ` d9~ = z ~J l- . ~ a• • ~ ~ / I ~ .~i ` ,..-~.I' ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . r ~ ~ . , ` , ~ _ 3 ~3 3 • r ~J. . r► . ! ~ ~ / O~ .,r - ! _ A c /3•87C ' . 0 M ~ I I ~ _ _ ~ ~,,,~,r " • ~"S`' ~ ; _ , r • _ ( ~ • Ir , ~ ~ t 1~ . 1 S'A . Ir ~3 Q 1 I Q I z: ,3, i ° 3 " ' :1. • • • ~j/2~~~_ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~5... ~r-~,.~ ` , @ F f c ~ ~ F 1 G p ~ ~ o ~ p ~ ~j r ~ za, i • z~~ . w ~ R O 8:e,a ► E ~ C~,~J 73•84C ► ~ - i _ ~ ~ ~ : 0 F 9 ~O ^ ~ • f~ B . SZ ? : m , ' •r~'~ ' i : ~ i ' ~ ` I I . , ~ - ~ ~ - - - • . . ~ r e. . _ _ . - `BA4/OBt'Y~I ~~:1: . ~ I - - - - - - - - - ~ + f, A i ~ ~ ~ t„ U ~ ~i ~ ' a jB^ ~a ~ ~ ► o~ _ ~pL,~~ I v L r " ~ _ - _ ~ C _ ~ I I ~J ; ~ ► ~1~, ,f 46 ~j, 0 6_69 / g , ~ ~ ~ -•1~- - - ~ ~ - - - ~ -x" _ ' ` , • " ~ ~ ~ 282 -~5~ `i~ rT T_- ~ ~C 4 ~ , 'R p ~ • = ~ o,., Ai I - , .c ~ .&-o~ ~1..e. 1 I 1 ,?.,6~ Rp. ~ 1~,_~; ~,;ar. • •s~ ! ~ •~+r. i ~ ` ~ ~ ; . •.•r r.~ ls V - - i 1 ..:r..{i 11 .9 -~~4p•;~ ~ A-`.K.3..c - - ~ - - - - r I~1~~C • ` !a " ~ \ ~ //ri ~ ~ • ~/QWiJ ~T W ls u e t 128 - ~ ~ t . /,1 , J • • ~I / ~ • a PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREBT ' PMONE 4$6 2205 SPOKANB WASNINGTON 98260 't SP01tANC COYMTII CQYRT MOYS[ PLANNING REPORT DATE FEBRUARY 4, 1988 TO SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER C OMMITTEE FROM SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT S U B JECT REZONE #ZE-48-86, AGRICULTURAL to NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINES S (B-1) ZONE VARIANCE #VE-112-87, TO ALLOW NEIGHBORHOOD BUS INES S(B-1) ZONE WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF ANOTHER NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (B-1) OR LOCAL BUSINESS (B -1) ZONE I GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant/Owner CHARLES E S IMPS ON Proposal A request to rezone an approximate 14,725 square foot site from Agricultural to Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone for the purpose of continued use as a home and development of a retail bakery, pizza and sandwich shop Also, a request for a Variance from S ection 6 24 310 of the S pokane County Zoning Ordinance to allow Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone to be located approximately 150 ~ feet from a Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone whereas a separation of at least 2,640 feet is required Location The site is generally located west of and adjacent to Argonne Road, and south of and adjacent to Cataldo Avenue in S ection 18-25-44 Tax Parcel Numbers 18541-1301 and 1302 C3~ i II SITE ANALYSTS ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 Comprehensive Plan MA70R COMMERCIAL Category Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary Inside Pnority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary Inside Urban Inlpact Area (UTA) Boundary The Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone serves to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan Business zoning with use restrictions, landscaping and sign limits have been approved within the Argonne-Mullan Corridor The Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone requlres adequate landscaping treatments to provide for land use compatibility with adjacent uses Arterial Road Plan The existing one-way road couplet system of Argonne and Mullan with six (6) lanes of traffic flow serves as a principal arterial and implements the Arterial Road Plan Zoning Existing on ,STTE AGRICULTURAL (established 1947) and within Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone Tp the NORTH Multi-Family Suburban (established 1968) Agricultural Suburban (established 1964) Agricultural (established 1947) Neighborhood Business (established 1987) T=e EA~T Commercial (established 1984) T..=e WEST Agricultural (established 1947) Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1980, this Corridor has been changing to non-residennal uses Special requirements for landscaping, sign limits and use restrictions have resulted in an aesthetically pleasing development pattern Land Use Exi~= on $I'I'E Single family residence and store To the NnRTH. Ap artmen ts T Engineenng/surveying office To the EAST Vacant To the WEST_ Single family residences Apartments, office complexes and small-scale, low intensity business uses appear to be the predominant development trend as single family residences are being replaced Compatibility can be assured through conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee The A~_ II SITE ANALYSIS ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 Land Use Planning Department has recommended the site comply with B-1 development standards by May 15, 1988, for the portion of the site used commercially Zoning Code Variance The Planning Department supports the variance request to atlow Neighborhood Business (B-1) zoning within 1/2 mile of another B-1 or Local Business Zone This B-1 Zone would provide for a smoother transiaon for the more intensive areas between Mullan and Argonne westward to the residential areas Granting the variance does not authorize a use otherwise prohibited and does not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on other properties in the vicinity and similar zones Site Characteristics Sice Size Approx 14,725 square feet Exisnn~Buildmgg Qne Tooo~raphy Relanvely flat VWtatic.n Natural and residential Agncultural SummanX The Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan is not intended for agricultural protection Moimng Str= Argonne Road to the east of the site is a 50 foot County right of way improved with three paved lanes, curbs and sidewalk Cataldo Avenue to the north of the site is a 40 foot County right of way improved with two paved lanes The County Engineer is requesnng ten (10) feet of dedication along Cataldo with ten (10) to twelve (12) feet of additional asphalt, sidewalks and curbs along Cataldo Proposed Site Plan Um Retail bakery, pizza and sandwich shop Prop,qr.d Buil in None REQUIRED PROPOSED Pgrking 5 2 - front 3 - rear 3 - along Cataldo pro~ Buffenng Techmq= None shown on site plan, Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone requires 5 feet of landscaping along Cataldo and Argonne with 20 feet, S feet of which is dense along the south and west property lines Also required is paved parking areas and no portable signs would be allowed A 3 L II SiTE ANA .YSiS ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 Proposed Site Plan Other Site Plan Considerations The site plan submitted by the sponsor is pretty much and "as is" design The Planning Department has recommended phased improvements in an attempt to increase the aesthetics of the site II_o_t_e - The site plan submitted for review by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature Detailed review to determine compliance with all Ordinance regulauons and conditions of approval is recommended to be administrative and to occur at the $ uilding Permit s tage III STI'E DE .i.nPMFNT RE OMMENnATTONS Buffering/Landscaping Site plan does not provide for landscaping, as recommended this will be phased into the development Stgnage Compliance with the Neighborhood Business (B-1) standards is required Circulation/Access Site plan shows three (3) accesses to Argonne and one (1) to Cataldo, County Engineering conditions would require their approval S to rmw ate r D rainag e Compliance with ' 208' required for new paved surfaces S ewage Dis posal The site will be double plumbed when new structures or a change of occupancy occurs Water S upply Provided by Hutchinson Irrigation District #16, who indicate that no change is required Fire Protection Fire Distnct #1 Critical Materials/Use Activity Compliance with Aquifer Sensitive ~ Area Overlay Zone standards required for aquifer protection I V SEPA ENVIRONMENTA L REYIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the spoasor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines The Zoning Administrator has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Detenrunaaon of Non-Significance ("DNS IV SEPA ENVIRONMEN"_rAr, ttFVTFw ZE-48-87 & VE-11Z-87 The "DNS" was circulated to eight other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment The "DNS" comment period ends February 3, 1988, and was adverased 15 caleadar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related tesnmony and the "DNS" at the public hearing V PLANNINC SUMMARY The Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone is consistent with the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning trend established in the Argonne-Mullan Corridor This zone, when adjacent to single family residential, requires buffering to assure compatibility between uses The Planning Department has recommended phased improvements The Planning Department recommends approval of the variance to allow B-1 zoning within 1/2 mile of another B-1 or Local Business zoning based on the proposal' s consistency with the criteria for granang a variance as established in Section 36 70 810(2) and 4 08 080 through 082 of the Spokane County Zoning Code V I CONDITIONS OF APPRnVAL (Ail Conditions imposed by t6e Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee s hati be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall inctude the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors ) s) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT S tandard 1 Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighang and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 2 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired 3 The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 4 All current standards of the Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site X5 1 L VI CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZE-48-87 8t VE-112-87 a) C OU N TY PLAN N IN G D EPARTMEN T 5 That the present proposal is not detauled enough to determine whether or eot the use of or materials stored on the site are in compliance with Chapter 4 16A (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zoae) of the SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE Accordingly, as s condiaon of approval, the spoesor/applicant shall be requued to file with the Spokane County Auditor, within thirty (30) days of the signing of Findings and Order of the final decision in this matter, a"Notice to the Public" which shall provide in material as follows PRIOR TO THE IS S UANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING OR ANY U S E ON THE PROPERTY DES CRIB ED HEREINAFTER, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 4 16A (AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY ZONE) THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS NOTICE IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS " 6 Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits Special 7 That the portion of the site devoted to business uses shall comply with the Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone standards no later than May 15, 1988 T6e remainder of the site shall comply at the time the existing use changes to a B-1 use This condition shall provide some discretion to the Zoning Administrator but at a minimum shall include five (5) feet of landscaping along Argonne, paved parking and sign compliance 8 Applicant shall comply with ' 208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff This may be phased as required in Condition #8 above ~ b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ PnQr To The Issuance ()f A Budding Permit~ r Ule Of The Propertv As Pronosed J S tandard 1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer ~60 VI CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans 3 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or any portion thereof, if the development is to be phased 4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 5 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 6 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road S tandards and S tormwater Management in effect at the date of construcnon, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resoluaon No 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 8 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right of way unnl a permit has been issued by the County Engineer AIl work withia the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 9 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer S pecial 10 Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Cataldo and a 20 foot radius on Argonne and Cataldo a7 VI CONDIT ONS OF APPRO'VAL ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 11 Tbe County Engineer has designateci Typical Roadway Section Number One, Access Streee standard for the improveanent of Cataldo Aveaue which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 10 to 12 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development Curbtng and sidewalks must aiso be constructed c ) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT S tandard 1 Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80- 041 S, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized This authorizauon is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is furtber conditioned and subject to specific applicanon approval and issuance of permits by the Health District 2 The Owner(s) or S uccessor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place their name(s) on a peution for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCVV 36 94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s) property PRQVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94 3 Any water service for this proJect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended S peciaf 4*Each new structure or change in occupancy shall be double plumbed for connection for future area-wide collection systems *Qnly applies if modifying existing sewer system d ) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT S tandard 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County a0 . VI CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZE-48-87 & VE-112- 87 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Ualities, Spokane Connty 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services 4 Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage system may be authorized 5 Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT S tandard: 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 No change shall be made in the character of occupancies or use of any building which would place the building in a different division of the same group of occupancy or in a different group of occupancies, without first obtaining a change in use permit from the Department of Building and Safety Special 3 A building permit was issued on October 28, 1985, for interior remodeling of the grocery store Proper inspections have been made f ) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Water Purveyor is Hutchinson Irrigation District #16 and they will supply the site wit6 adequate water for domestic, fire and irngation uses g) SPOKANE COUNTY AIR PULLUTION CONTROL AUTHORTTY All au nolluaon rq&U1 anons must be me ThLs includes but is not Iimite.d to the follomnngs Standard 1 Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen a~ ~ VI CONDTI'IONS OF APPROVAL ZE-48-87 & VE-112-87 g) SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORTTY anateraal must be controlled as well as effiissions from all other construction related activities 2 Measures must be takea to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures musr be taken immediately to clean these surfaces 3 All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean 4 SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV addresses emission standards All emission standards must be met 5 Demoliuon and renovation projects must comply with the requirements of CFR 40 Pari 61, S ubpart M Intent to Demolish and Renovate forms are available at the S CAPCA office BE) :m V O , ~ ~ 1 ~ C' ~ , vr` * ~Qt c,,a rzv rn evd-w,- ;o rz. 'I rn~ r--o-O er►-n ~-r~.~O ~u-i Ir~~ n.y . i ! '~5 d ° As c-, s s ct_ L'''A-~ 0 OL.) ~ Ct ~~rc i c"A►-~ } ov, -A S C+L al ~ 1`'C 9 ~ - C' ct►~~.1-~~ ~ s Y-n oL.. w ■ ♦ . f. SF'OF=:A.NE COUNTY ENG I NEF_R I NG DEF'ARTMEIVT ~ From: Spol~:ane County EnginLer 's Dt:p_:1rtmant 1^-~ Suh.ject: Conditions of Apnroval Zc7ne Change Now YI.L..._"i'Cl~ 1X Applicants Rlam _SIM F"') :7h1____.____-------- rection 18_, Towr,ahip ;_hJ, R~.iriyc 44_ EWl The r oI 1 owing "Coriditiuns of F?pproval" f or the above ref erE=nc=a-d Zc?r+~: chanye ar~e s~ibmitted to the Spok:ane C~~~~nty Hear ir~~~ E:~aminer Co~~~m:i'_t.ee f~»~r i.ncltis ion in the "F'lanning Fteprirt" znd "F inLd i^c.~~~ ~:~.nci L7rr" ci f t,ic= ~_z:_~1a1 ~ ~ he ar i. ng scriedu 1 ed _FFBF:UA F-~Y_43___~_ 1 r~38. Frior to the release of a building permit: 4. . , ~ i .4. } ,r~ f'.,,~i r{,., ~ .•-ici ~ ~ 1. . Apprlt_ant sh~-~'.I f Y i r~_: 1 uh. i r- ~ i -t` n r• . . 1- t - _ , ; ; f . , t i I , r` . . . i . ; . , : I r'' • _ _ . _ ~ i . . i .4 _ • r" , i L i..' F. J . . _ _ - - • ' _ C.i . Y11 F. :.1 f. f . _ . . I . ' . . `i- . I - - . - . ' ' , - , i . . . - r . . _ . . . • _ . , . . . . _ . 'I , . . _ and t.he Spok:ane C:ounty €-Iealth UiStr ict a detai led co+nbinec~..1 on-sit_e sew~;_~ - yys'EFm plan and sLirface water disposal p]An for the errtire p^c, portion therAof i f the cievelopment_ is ; 10. A parE:ing plan and traific circulct:-_ approved by the Spol.fane Caunty Engineer. The design, location ar,,--. E,rrangemenll- of parE;ing stalls shal I be in accordance with standar enyineering practices. F'aviny or sUrfaci~-Iy as approved by tf-le Cour+~ Engineer W111 be required for ar'.' c,f t.F~c-} occi_tpiPd or ti,aveled by vehiclet, 13. The construction ot the roac_!w,_Ay a.ccomF.;lished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 15. The County EngineEr has desigriated Typical Foadway S~c~I'Ljr~l NL.,0iL. QI'aE~_ACCESS_STR_FET_STAr~DARA_ f or ttiA i rnp r ovement o f_CATA__DO_AVF_NIJE_ - .jacent to the proposed devPloprnent. This wi.l l require the adc'4~_ ~ zs ad aF appro:: imately 10_TO_12_ft. of asphalt aIong the f rontac,-, r_Ievelopment. CLtrbing and sidewalE-: must also be construct ; ~ 1ID. AI 1 r~.~ ,.:,u i red i mpr n v-~---mc.,nt---3 sh~-i1 1 con for m k a t i-i r? cUr r F~ -i. Washingt_on Standard Specif ic-zitions far Fioad anci Bridge construct.io+~ :Arld o}.her appl i.cable county star7dardsci and/or adopted resolutions pertaininc ~ pertaining to F:aad 5tandards and Stormwater Management in ef iect at the . i r i . _ 1 1. _ . _ _ t- . _ _ T . _ i . _ i _ j . _ i . ! _ . . I . I . - ~ •_1 . . . 1 1 L. i i" . i _1' : i' . •i t- . r . . _ . - _ . . . 4 Jt'+i requirements are foitnd in SpaG::ane Board of County Commis,ion~r< r eso lut i on 80-159t as amended and ar e aE~ ' ; ~ . . . , . , . y ~ r J' " . 24, hio construct ion worE:: i's to be per f ormed within th2 E:: ist ing c propcased r ight of way urlt i 1 a pp-rmit has been is Sued by the Caunt; Engineer. All work: within the pLtblic road righ+ o{ tol.v js in spection and approval by tiie Courity Engineer. 25. A11 required construction within the e::ista~jg or riglit af way is to be completed prior to the release of a building pc-r;r;~ ' or a bond in an amoLtnt estii-nated by the County EnginEer ta cover, the cci-_ ' >>f construCtiOrn or :~rmpro vE:Am~.-rtit_s s ha l'. be f -ile d wi.±h than CQi_kc-ity Engireer. ♦ j+,+► ~ rG'[ v'a~- / i f - - - ~ ' ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING OEPARTMENT ~~4v Se$04 APPIICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSiFICATION Appllcation No ~ Name of Applicant Lia ni-Le Street Address of Appiicant ,LI,.,~c) City c c_tic~ State Zip Code D9zm Tele No 92ce --13Z Z Name of Property Owner(s) l Yl A 1'1 ts F. c,,xA Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner) ="t Existing Zoning Classiticatjon 4 ~ I 9t -0 Date Existtng Zone Classification Establtshed Existing Use of Property c,►,~ ~ z~ r ~n~-~1 r~ce~~-ly s~~. o~a 1~e ~ se c.ti1~ vt~tyl•Lbor1-zeCd o~~oce..ry S~bre Proposed Zone Classification R- ~ e-/"`./ i j" C. Proposed Use of Property vi t,5 e- &.1 %V L SCf. io+ c.1 t~ S tr~ a i ~ Legal Description ot Property ~ st. 5i- 1 v G ~ . 0. S ri e rl _ ~ ~ + c tit t vt s ch- rt(s ~ *c C% }'3t ~ ` ~ Sectfon Lb Township -L.:S5; Range drd- Sou rce of Legal , Assessor's Parcel No (See tax staterment) ~g~~1 -1301 A►z~ 18541- L3o~ Property Site ,_a,,~' x s Frontage 15x5_Feet on V.=J Total amount ot adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor „JL 830 c5 v-. Street Address of the Property M q 9 -2-1 "4- r o&A It you do not hold tttle to the property affected by this appiication, whaf 1s your interest in ttt ~ nC~~ Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property te 4.1 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED 1 What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feei make Lhls proposal warranted~ 326,4t ~-c y.1&1A1,bQr►tee~ c.s,A. Soc►-A 4 r ~a~ ,r..L C. ~t ,~'-i`~ V 1 ll 1~ 11 L 1 t t1 e~ tS ll c ~n~ t~ ~ ~ -o•-- ~4~- 2 What effect will the proposed tone reclassificatlon have on the adjacent properties, ~a Rev 2/3/81 /010~) ~ . . . _ . - . _ I~~PLiCATiON fOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION••continued-2 This section of the application will provide the Planning Oepartment's Staff with written verificat,on that the applicant has had preliminary consuitation with the agencies identified Resutts of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal betore final submlttal to the Planning Department 1 COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE p~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal ot this proposai for rezone have been satisfied -Z_. ~ i 9 natur Date j~ 2~ COUNTY UTIl.1TiE5 OFFICE ~ ubl~ j~ ,~j A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our ~ dr` ) requirements for submittal of this proposal for re=one have been satistied The designated water purveyor for this site is ~ OPP ~s ~Sjgnature) (Daie) / ~ 3 WATER PURVEYOR ~NAME)11.3-I-c ti,tr, s Lti-t _~T-r,r-j ~ o-~-~cs~ 'b►s~. l.lo.titv a) The proposai (is) located within the boundary of our service area b) Satistactory arran9ements (have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water (Signature) (Date) 4 BUILDING AND SAFETY QEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to dlscuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposai for rezone have been satistied This proposal is located in Fire District #I (Signature) (Date) 5 COUNTY NEALTN DISTRICT ~ A preliminary consultatlon has been held to discuss the proposal The applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards (Signature) (Date) i, TNE UNOERSIGNED, SwEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PER 'uRY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTNFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KN01+Y- LEOGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SiTE PRO- POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATiON, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITN IS W_,BJX.IEN.._-_PERMlS5lON FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON Hi5`OR-HER-BEHALF`'' ' (Signed) , Date (Address) Phone Zip NOTARY Oate NOTARY SEAL SIGNATURE 4F APPLICANT OR AGENT Date Rev Z/3/81 ~ . Y ~ :CS 3t` 'Y ~ F'~ ~ K ~ y+ y ~r y, ~a.. `YE . v`' i S, t ~ ~'fJ~j ~~~+.t" ~ i ~~'~q y t ,~o Yf r~ +S'~ ~ f ta "f ~ ~ ~ ~ e I ~'1-t ~ rt ~iq~,~ .vi ~ (~'yp ~~9f -S,i,~ ~~t~'~•+; L.ZA 7 p" ~S 9~~ Jrt'Sr'lr,s.~ ~n l y `t ~•'t i 1 IL) * F~~~, "f~, r ~ ~~~'Pf~ r~ ,~.c ~ ~4 r.~ t ~ ~ r~ " q ~ s4 ► a a J !',AT ~ i~„ ~.c~'~, w ~ u 1 t .sb y 3Z, 14 u^ t'~ F n. "'~'4r " i r+ r y ~ ~ ~ C j,~ ~ ~ ~ L' ~ ~ic~ ~ ~u ~ f tS v} d., t ~ ; F t ~ t Y ~ t ~1 1 ..9' 1 1~ t r~ S4 } R" ' tl ~ uiw 't , A A t "%.0' I s d ti, ~ ~ t a~ u r~r c~ ar ~ f ~ ~,^y~ r'~ ~ ~ ~ r b ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ .r ~ ~ ~ ~'r .S' ti w -a ,t, / i4h41~ A. vr* 3~ ~r~ e ~ r , t - . ~ a f,'9t ~ ~ ~ tN' x, f ~ lp ~ iy' • ~ ► ~ 3 ~ ~ t ~ y. ~ ~ ~~".,.r o, y? J"r y + L ~ i e i ~ t ~ ! J : ~ ~ ~ ~ r4l S ~ ~,y 6 4t~ ! ,~e ~ t i p~ ~ 1 tM Y ~ ~ C ~ ..a ~ r P b~` r` ,c~"y 4 .r -s 2 L ya ~ . 11. 4 ~ty~ y~{~ ~y~ ~ • ~ .t ~ 7 OI ~ h ~-f fL~r'14,~~ T yc .J - • ~_.ca3+a~L~3r.._+....+uV~a. .~a.~ malle:.a.~ ..a~~.r.sJV .L~r cz v y~ a` i a b~ ~ o 0619 it E C E I P T Date l~ 19 ~Z Received FromjC1oiton.1e: Ara.d A~ ~ r p f~,~. djt~ ~ 4 ~ Address ~ ' ~ Dollors 4 For 7--a' ~j rK ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID t Aw►T oF N 811 JEFFERSOh 1~ ACCOUNT I G~ I t r~ ~ • AMT PAtD I CHECK ~ e~►wHCE i Mor~► cue I oaoER gy Z&Z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 8K806 (tE,DlFORM ~•a . ~.-c~•~ 1!~ f t+; ..~-os+ r T'^--• rr.-- ~ ~.r.. y +e1r-r ~-r,r.~-. - ~ ~ .f•~,,.` ^S'TS"~+ ;.3 'C~V ~ ` a-° Z CHARLES E SlMPSON ~r 5 RICHARD L SIMPSON 0 t a 4~ ~ j~ i, fi N 909 ARGONNE RD 926-1322 ~ ,f q a v ~4 SPOKANE WA 99206 197156 r 3250 c. ~Qc) C r'~~ r :L ~ ~ "'K R f i ~4~~ { ~ N Pacific First {i J ~ ~ ~ J A ld sa~~sPO ~ 14507 r Fsuc PACIFIC MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT ~ y ^ H ' ~ •,'~d~~.~°c'k~ 1~ V E.12005 BprOp11B llveflue,, Spokone, MtbAtnptm 8➢211 1 r d f~ ~ ~~n 3 1 rs Y S* ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ a 1►` ~ ~ ~~h~°' ~~Y1LLh A- r~ ~ a `r ' 7 ro t ~ ~ -1.32507L552~:~1i3oll L030623ool0ii' OLSi ~ •~s ~ { - ~ ~ y~.s„ ~ .~7 ~ +4►q f r ~'1 «Q i~,~ kw~~~ ~~~.q- ~ ~i~3• ~ ~iµ~} f ~ d t~ P Y i f f q; h ~o t ~.r ~ i ~ %L " r A a s.~,~ j 9 f~ ~ l ~'1 r7i } { X ~ ~ t ~ s } 4 AL ts t 7 ~ „ 4t ~i~5►a c v~ ui~ r r ~ ~ s} t~-fr3 C h f 4 4x- , r~ ~ 1 il-_ 4' - r" ~ ~ ~'g'* ` tr + 4 " L « j, f ~S ~ i e.~. ~ ~z .a va 4- r t 3 1 ~ `'r '~r _ _ ~ r "~►~kd,-~ . a +~.t 5~~,. ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C'r t .s k ~ ~ ~ r 3 ~ ~tp ~ 1 ~ ~ p~ ~ w 4 i ~ h ..t ~ p { ( y~ ttff ~j, I~~ ~ ~ C 4' ^ t '{i:~ 7 S' L ~v' y, ~ s , r~-1 .a ~ T~~ T 1 .X A~ tH• R ♦ Q ti ~ K F~lv ~F~ ,~F+ ~ + !I, r ~Z • lE,~-~ i' ~ ln= a 1~^►~' ~ ~w ~ 'y 'r&,.a $Q ~ `d k( f ~ ~s 7+ .~~.P ~c r~ ~ k L ~ r~ ~€f K 4 t 'T ~ 'l~~' - 01 t S ~ •~~•i~i ~~w s ~ N'~~."~~`~ ►4 ~f ~~~~~r~.~µ ~a 9 .r K!y'°~'~~ i l `~-~j; ~ 0.3~+~~~~..t~~t~4~ c~ ~Ti. # ~ ' ~ ~ , PLANNING DEPARTMENT i = ' eROaDwAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PMONE 456 2205 Rfcorj~ ~ ~~n ~ ~s ✓q~ l) SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 spor4N 5 19g$ svo c cou ccu i cusc E CO u~ N MEMORANDUM FNGiEFR TO Tom Davis, County Building and Safety Department Bob McCann, County Engineering Department Jim Legat/Dean Fowler, County Utilities Department Scott Fink, County Health District FROM Pat Frankovic, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE January 5, 1988 RE February 4, 1988, Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Agenda Attached is the information for the February 4, 1988 Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Agenda Scheduled are three zone reclassifications, one variance request, and one change of conditions All three actions have site plans which are attached for your review Also included are copies of the Zoning Action applications which may aid you in reviewing the propos- als Also, would you please note on your conditions which are standard and which are ones that you consider special Please review the information and submit your comments and recommenda- tions by Tuesday, January 19, 1988 If you have any questions, please give me a call PAT FRANKOVIC Assistant Zoning Administrator PF llm ZONING IiCARING EXAMINCR COM141ITTEE FEBRUARI 4 1988 PAGC TWO 2 ZC--IR-KG f1(:RI('tlI TIJitA1. T() NI:1(:III;n1t1lt)()i) I;iPqINI'SS and fI1-11 70NE VE-112-87 VARIAn'LE Tn &I.I,ONV 'f I IIBnRIInOn flUSINFSS (R-1) 7,O11i; Ny1Tt1IN 1/2 M1'ii[ f; ()F .AN()T11F.fZ NN.I(:lili()Itllt)()1) IiLJtiINFSS !I; 11 nll J.f) 4tl. l;ilSln'FtiS '1()Nri Generally located at the southwest corner of Argonne Rosd and Cataldo Avenue in Section 18 25-44 TAX PARCEL NUMBER 18541 1301 and 1302 COMPREH E1V S I VE PLAN Major Commercial PROPOSED USE Retail and continued residential VARIANCE To allow a Neighborhood Business (B-1) Zone to be located approximatelv 160 feet from another B-1 Zone whereas Section 6 24 310 of the Zoning Code requires a separation of at least Z 640 feet between B-1 Zones S ITE S IZE Approx 14,700 square feet APPLICANT Charles E Simpson N 919 Argonne Road S pokane, WA 99212 3 ZE- 5 7- 8 7 BFSInE,~VTI &L nFFiCE TQ RF i R SU 1'ESS _AL an d fR-2) 7.Q,~LF ZE-136A-80 CL1A1\(:F OF CONI)iTIQYS TN A~(?MMFR~'1IAI_ 7(~ Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Walnut Road in Section 17-25-44 TAX PARCEL NUMBCRS 17544-2618 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Major Commercial PROPOSED USE Used car lot & future retail center ~ • : ~i y y' ` r ~ ~ 1 ~A . k~'.~.-~ , ►.~~`K z ~ t ; ~ ~ 5''' ~ ~ ~pa CY ~ „~.t.~ *'t' 1 ~ ..+..y■■■ M ~ 1 ~ i ~ • I ~ • ; 1 ~ ~1~1r~„~ + Y1 r ~ ` l ~ ~ ~ ~ ► _ f,a" ~t-+. `j • L„ r,~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ - ~ ► ~ ~ ~ tr~ t', E~ ~ ~ r, ~ ► . l r ~ s y 5•1 ➢ ~ r,.r't~~~'~1 ` ~ ► ► ~ , 11r ~ i t ~ ' • , ~ I s , f r el ~i ~ < ..it3 1 ~~1 • ~ ~ , • - ~ ,~^Sl1. v_31h~ ~ fkb~- NPc,ot',al 00 R G0t 4 t~ T ~ A ~ ~ - 1 M~``AN R Q #41 y~ ~ 1 C3~~~ • ~ r ~ ~ p0~fl ~ ' ~ ~ ~ vu~l►" , iV ~ t (aC ~ • ~0~~ ~ r v ^ le~✓~ N .r ~"d 1 JI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . r > ~+ptl►10 ~ .C ~ t pc IT p} ^ ~J.. 't A r~~° , a0 ►~~ho,. Au^ rt~t r N ~ T ti , ~ a „ ~ • ~'i D--.~'~' ~ ~ 0 I fi u. o•~ ~ • ~ 6- E C NG DE R ENT: .i YNf NTY PLANN I 48 86 ~ oJ #FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION y~" .Sc DE ~►h Application No ~ L s, ~ ~ rr Name of %60"P"ffl ~ Street Address ot Applicant ,va,,~ City State _)bjA. Zip Code z. Te{e No e3'zc4 -1"3Z'Z. Name of Property Owner(s) Clr,ti rlts E . c. nI Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner) Wnt Existing Zoning Classification 44 ~ l9d-`i ) Date Existing Zone Classification Established 1 n94.'1 Existing Use ot Property e%--5e c%„4 -kJ&)6f ----I -%'v & usel aa 11 o%- st anA_ VtGt9hborHbod V, oct .ry SEore Proposed Zone Classification C P ~es> Proposed Use of Property 1~qy~~► ~ 1~ ~I~c~~ ,~~-~~,T, nTzzt= iJh r~41- a~ I Legai Oescription ot Property ~j fi E 1, 4 Ic es oV 0 C1, l~ ~ J ~ S eF 0. s ta o rt f .1 V ~ [ 't 1 N S ~ ri S ~ c~ ~ ~ t A ✓1_s L1L~"" ~V-~ • ► • C 0 ` \ Section tk Township -L„5 RanQe 4-4. Souree of Legal Assessor's Parcel No (See tax statement) 18s.41-1301 o-L ~ Property Size 9~5 x 5 Frontage 15c5 Feet on Total amount ot adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor _JL 8'3d Sv- Street Address of the Property 9 A=~11 n4L Vo s.,a If you do not hold tftle to the property aftected by this appltcation, what is your interest in itt ~ ~,=rwe-4- V.-0- b eL s.A f - Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property z c,{,Zb did+reaC e,~ \9~-`l AI.L OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWEREO 1 What are the changed conditions of the site area, whlch you teel make this proposal warranted) e~- Y ~ v t o►~ ~-e:. 11 c~~ Qrn v S &:L )ahgP C.Aaje CALt!1-6 #;~a _,~.~.1~- ~o~- . ~zr ?~•~3 2 What effect witl the proposed Zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties7 41L,& Rev 2/3/81 Or--- AfOPLiCAT10N FOR ZON£ REClA551FICATION--continued-2 i ~ This section of the appiication w111 provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identifled Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal betore tinai submittal to the Planning Department 1 COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE, p~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our db requirements for submittai of this proposal for rezone have been satlstied ~ O&Z ~ _;~~c -z- -t 7 tSi natur Date 9 2p CDUNTY UTI LITt ES OFFICE , A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal ot this proposal for r z ne have been sat)stied T e designated water purveyor tor this site is r~ 4 ~j En T-x PP ignature Date) 3 wATER PURVEYOR ~NAME r~Lyj Y1-y--I a~. ~dri 'k 4~-,4 )~1ts i(o a) The proposal (is) (~--_j located within the boundary of our service area c ha ~hA~ t r~~~~,~~td) b) Satistactory arrangements (~e) ( t) been made to serve this proposal c) We (are) ( ) able Lo serve this site with adequate water 2, e~ • 5 gnatu re 4 6UILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, A prel+minary consultaLion has been held to discuss the proposal Our requlrements tor submittal of thts proposal for rezone have been satistied This proposal is located in Fire Oistrict ~ ~ '4 - Sinature ~Date~ t 9 ) l4r~a luc ~f ~}c.1 sovr f- D! 9~. F~ yC' C k ~U • ~ ~ P ,r-~ 5 COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A preliminary consultation has been heid to discuss the proposal The D% 4adp ~ca sbeen infor d of our requirements and standards natu~e ate i, TNE UNOERSIGNED, SwEAR uNDER THE PENALTY OF PER.►uRY TNAT TNE A60VE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- LEOGE I FURTHER SWEAR TNAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECQRD OF THE SITE PRO- POSEO FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, iF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACNED HEREWITH 15 WB.LT,S-EN P-EBMI$SION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZlNG MY A C T i O N 5 O N H l 5 ty "E R B FHATF- (Signed ) Date 9 7 ,7 (Add ress ) N 90`~ r~. ~ ~ Phone Z- . ~ c~j ) Z ~ 0 __p pi1 k~ .n r Zi p ~ ~ w• 0~ ti; NOTARY , date % A'Illt ~~9 0~.~~ IqRY P SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Date ~ Rev 2/3181 , a . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • SPO E F)ITAIA N~~ 11OR/BOARD PARTVNT 12 87 OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIONS B E 2w~~ Certificate of Exemption No D~C ~N 1~„0 1987 Application No VE -c 1 Name of Appl icant C~arLw; PNING!SFP,"?yg.7 , 16f-~~{s Street Address o p Home 9 2 4--&aL_ City ~ State ~ A r Code Phone Work ~zc. -L~, Agent Name of Property Owner(s ) Cic a►r-LW ~ S) w7ps o r? REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action) iriancet_Z)> Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use Waiver ot Violation Temporary Use/Structure Other ~**~*t#t~*f***~***~tt**~#~**#**f*~#~#~##t*~~~#* FOR STAFF USE ONLY Code Ordinance , a-~- , * Cite Regulation Section(s) (ez`~ ~~D UJ/f" /°O'~J2"o' o~►c.o~~~-I ~ Violatio . pro ert ~ P Y # Section 16 7ownship 2S Range Size Enforcementl Y N ~ , Existing Zoning 00~{ Comp Ptan Oesignation 1?7c,.i0a-Av--, v I.EGAL * PSSa (:Y) N UTA Y N ASA (3N FIRE DIST ~ j CHECKEO 8Y . * Hearing Date Personnel Taking in Application , ~*~******~~#*t~*~t*#t#****~******t~*#****~~***Exist1ng Use of Property s~--ore Oescribe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS above 7f e 120 r- r.•, ea,r- a ~.)4xkvq vS E► r- 0 P&t4y Street Address of Property t~ lp 6 y-~ Ed legal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable) T~ gL&;L~ ~o 0 . c ! ✓t SoY1 S ~s~ o ~ TLt ~ tlew~ , 2 2, ~ L<D W H ` ~ 5! f)1I L S CI I1'1 A4...I01 T E ~C c E ~T' +_haT P-01►- Lw Parcel No(s) I 8j5 di -)301 ewl 185d.1 • 136z.. Source of Le9a1 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by thls owner/sponsor _!ij 3 F What interest do you hold in the property7 e., m4rac~- Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property _L,Q.n& 4+ L a A 6~ & ► n 19 41 I SWEaR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, TNAT (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE, (2) IF NOT THE OWNER. WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SaIO OWNER AUTHORI- ZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHEO ANO (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES ANO 7HOSE 014 SUPPO NTS ARE MAOE TRUTHFULLY ANO TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE i :~~~r••~:s'FJ'~1 ~ ; !Z ca• Signed reAa1r1W_4__ r Address fV ie-k{ , s nrt ~J/~ " • Z~ Phone No gZ6 - , ~ DdtE ~21/G / c ~ NOTARY SEA Notar yOj'~s Date '~aRY Pli Page 1 of 4 (over) Revised 10/87 0 ~ M ~ A' BURDEN OF PROOF It is necessary for'theapplicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTIpN~s hould be approved and to literally put forth the basic case Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use.- etc ) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criter;a which the Zoning Adjustor must consider Please fill the form out and return it~~with your application If you did not get a form, ask the Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed ~ B SIGN~OFF 6Y COUNTY DEPARTMENTS 1 CO Jl A~TY HEALTH DISTRICT a) Pr osed method of water supply , ~ b) Propos method of sewage disposal / ~ A preliminary c nsultation has been held to discuss the pr 1osal The applicant has been informe of requirements and standards (Signature) (Datej- (Sign-off Waived) 2 COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPAR MENT A preliminary consultatio has been held to disc s the proposal The applicant has been informed of requi ments and standards (Signature) (Dat (Sign-off Waived) 3 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (waiv if ou ide WMA6) A preliminary consultation has b en held to discuss the proposal The applicant has been informed of quirements and standards r (Signature) (Da (Sign-off Waived) The applicant is required o discuss t e proposal with to become inf ined of sewage disposal require- ments and standards ac~ The applicant is requ red to discuss the pr osal with to become informed f water system requirements and standards ~ WATER PURVEYOR (waive i outside CWSSA) NAME a) The proposai is s not located tirithin the boundayy f our future service a rea b) The proposal /is not located viithin the boundary of ur current district c) We are/are nQt able to serve this site with adequate wat r d) Satisfactor arrangements have/have not been made to serv this proposal (Sighature) (Date) (sign-off ived) 5 SEWERA6 PURVEYOR NAME (If other than Spokane County) A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the propos 1 The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards ~ s + ( Si gnature ) ~ CDateT ~i gn-of~Wai ve~ ~l ! y ~ ~ .r Et Page 2 of 4 , Revised 10/87 ~ APPLICANT'S FORM NAME FILE ✓C (1Z'97 I YARIANCES A Wi11 the variance authorize a use ntherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes , No Comment B Will special circumstances a licable to the pro ~ert Isuch as size, shaPe, toPo9raPhY, surround n'gggis) when combined witFthe standards of the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difficulties for use of the property and/or deprive the property of ri ghts and pri vi 1 eges comnon to other properties in the vlcinity and similiar zone classification? Yes , No _X , Comment C Wi11 the granting of the variance be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vi ci ni ty and zone7 Yes , No Conments 0 Does strict application of the zoning standard create an unreasonable burden in light of purpose to be served by the standard? Yes , No >C , Comment , E Would relaxation of the zoning standard make a more environmentally sensiti ve or energy-conservi ng project or encourage conti nued or new use of an historic property? Yes , No Comment F Nill a broader, public need or interest be served by granting verse denying the variance7 Yes No , Comment G Is the case for a variance supported by other like or similar si tuati ons in the vi ci ni ty and i n simi l ar zones? Yes X_, No , Comnent (continued on reverse side) ' .a ~ H Wi11 granting the variance adversely affect the overall zoning design, plan or concept for either the imnediate area or the entire County? Yes , No Comnent I Is the case for a variance substantially based upon a lack of reasonable economic return or a claim that the existing structure is too small? yes , No >C , CommQnt J Will granting the variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes , No Comment K Did the practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance request exist before the property was acquired by the present owner? Yes , No Comment L Wi11 the granting of the variance result in defacto zone reclassifica- tion, that is, the establishing of nearly all the privileges common to a different zone classification? Yes , No Comment M Ooes the requested variance result in the circumvention of densi y regulations designed to protect the Aquifer? Yes , No , Comment 0046z/Arch 0002z 2 , r. i r . ri 4 . .