ZE-0020-98
~
SPOKANE CO~JNTY HEA.~tING E~AMINER
~ ~ D f ,
MAY 0 31999
RE: Zone Reclassification from Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone to ) CONCLUSI~~E Gp~My ENCINEEa
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22} Zone ) AND DECISION
Applicant: Paul Redlin )
File No. ZEu20-98 )
Z~ SU1I~IVIARY OF PROP~SAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (tJR-7} zone to the
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone on approximately 2 acres of land, for the purpose of
developing medical and professional offices, and possibly 14 multi-family dwellin~ units.
Decision: Approved, subject to condrtions.
II. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassif cation application and the
evidence of record and adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions:
A. GeneralI~formation:
Applican~: Paul S. Redlin, clo Dwight Hume, Suite 325,107 S. Ho~vard Street, Spokane,
WA 992.01
Legal Otivner: Paul S. Rediin, P. Box 244, Veradale, ~NA ~9037; and Ken R.edlin, P. 0.
Box 13156, Spokane, WA 992I3-3156
~ Address: 412 N. Century Lane
Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Valleyway, ~pproximately 220 feet
west of Sullivan Road, within the SE '/4 of Section 14, Township 25 No~~l, Range 44 E~TM,
Legal Descrip~ion: The East 53 feet of the ~Vest %z of Tract 56 of Vera, according to Plat
recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30 in Spokane County, ~rVashington. Together with the
West 78 feet of the East'/~ of Tract 56 of Vera; Also To~ether With the following desc~ibed
parcel; The East 53 feet of the ~Vest 131 feet of the East'/2 of Tract 55 of Vera; Except the Nor~h 315 feet and also except the South 180 feet.
Zoning: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7}. The site also lies within the Aquifer Sensitive
Area and Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zoning Code,
Comprehensive Plan Category: The most easterly extension of the site is desi~nated in the
Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, with the remainder of t~e site bein~
designated in the Urban category. The property is also Iocated within t~e Aquifer Sensitive
Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and ~Jrban Impact Area designa~ed by the Plan.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision Z~-20-98 Page 1
Environmental Reyiew: A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the t , Division of Building and Planning on 1Vlarch 26,1999.
Site Description: The site is 2 acres in size and flat. It is currently undeveloped, except for a
5-unit storage/garage structure located along the east property line, Portlons of the site are
landscaped and the perimeter of the site is enclosed with a sight-obscunng fence. A 2-lane paved
private access road runs along the east property line and serves the site. The si~e is located inslde
the interim urban growth area (IUGA} boundaries established by the County pursuant to the State
Growth Management Act. In 1994, the site was rezoned from the Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) zone for development of an 11-space manufac~ured home park. See final decision in
File No. ZE-27-93
Surrounding Conditions: Valleyway Road is designated as a Collector Axt~rial and Sullivan
Road as a Principal Arterial on the County .Arterial Road Plan maps. The land lyin~ north of the
site is zoned UR-3.5, and is an undeveloped playfield owned by a utllity company. The land
lying south of the site is zoned Regional B~siness (B-3) and UR-3.5, and is developed with
commercial and residential uses. The land 1}~ng between the site and Sullivan Road ~s zoned B-3
and Community Business (B-2), and is deveioped with office uses and other commercial uses.
The land lying west of the site is zoned tTR-3.5 and UR-7, and is developed with 2-story
duplexes. Sullivan Park is the nearest County pa~k to the site, located 1 mile to the south.
Sullivan Road is a major commercial corridor in the Spokane Valle~ area.
~'roject Description: The application re~uests a rezone to the UIZ-22 zone to allow
development of inedical and professiona~ o~`1ces, with the potential for a 14-un~t apartment
complex being constructed in lieu of one o~tl~e proposed office buildings. The site plan shows a
total of 3 two-story office buildings. The sout~erly ~wo buildings hav~ a 5,400 s~uare feet
footprint, while the office b~~ilding located at the ~or~h end of the slte has a 7,150 ~quare foot
footprint. The existing garage woufd remai~ and wo~:ld aiso be used for office space. The
required park~ng depends on the type of of~ce spac~ that is developed wlth~n each building, The
site plan does not clearly show the twen~y (20} feet of Type I landscaping required alon~
Valleyway, b~t existing landscaping may help satisfy the requirement. The site plan illustrates
10 feet and 15 feet of Type III landscaping r~spective~y along the west and no~th property Iine,
whereas th° UR-22 zone only requires 5 feet af Type III landscaping. A 6-foot high sight-
obscuring fence is illustrated along the borders of the property ~here required by the Zoning
Code.
B. ProceduralInfor~nation,:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane ~ounty Zoi~ing Code Chapter 14.622
Hearin Date and Location: April I4,1999, Spoka~e County Public ~1Vorks Building, g
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Raom,1026 ~Vest Bro~dway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: March 25,1999 by appl~cant
Posted: March 25,1999 by applicant
Published: March 29,19~9
Compliance: The legal req~irements for public notace hav~ been met.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-9$ Pa~e 2
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 96-0171(Hearing Examiner Ordinance)
r and ~6-0294 {Hearing Examine~ Rules of Procedure).
Testimony:
Stacy Bj ordahl Dwight Hume
Division of Building and Planning 107 South Howard, Suite 325
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99201
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Paul Redlin Steven Summers
P. 0. Box 244 15311 East Valleyway
Veradale, WA 99037 Verada~e, ~A 99~37
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Zo~ing Code, County Code and
Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294. Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report.
II~. LAND USE ANALYSIS/
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLt1SI0NS OF LAW,
A. Ap~roval criteria
The Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Hearing Examiner to grant, den}r or gra~lt
with such conditions, modifications and restr~ctions as the Examiner finds necessary to nlake a
land use application corr~patible with the Spokane County ~eneralized Comprehensive Pl~~~ and
applicable development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment "A",
paragraphs 7~d} and section l l; and RC~V 36.70.970. Such regulati~ns include without
lim~tation ~he Spo~ane County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy ~ct (SEPA) and ~he
County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11.10 0~ the Spokane County Co~.e).
In considerin~ a reZOne application, V~ashington case law generally p~ovides that 1) t~~ere Ys
no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. Parkridge v.
Seattle, 98 V~n. 2d 454, 4b2 {1978); and Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 'Wn. App~ 840 (1995).
The comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation, and a111y
general conformance with a comprehensive plan is required to approve a rezone. See Citizens for
~Yloicnt Vernon v. Ci~y of Mount Vernon,133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997); and Cathcart v. Snohomish
County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Where a comprehensive plan conflic~s with zoning
regulations, the provisions of the zoning code will usually be construed to prevail. See
Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County,124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994},
Section 14.402.020 of the Zoning Code authorizes amendments to the Code based on any
one of six (6) grounds, without ~ifferentiating between amend~nents to the zoning text of the
code and amendmen.ts to the official zoning map. The relevant criteria for review of a site
specific rezone are found in Zonin~ Code 14.402.020 (1}, which authorizes the Code to be
amended if it is "...consistent with the C~mprehensive Plan and ~s not detrimental to the publ~c
welfare. and in Zoning Code 14.402.020 (2), which author~zes a Code amendment where a
. HE Findin~s, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-9~ Pa~e 3
..[c]hange in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occu~red to warrant Y ~
modification af this Code...".
Zoning Code 14.100.104 provides that t~e Code shall be interpreted to canry out and
implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the general plans for physical
development adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Zoning Code 14.100.106 states
that when the Zoning Code conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans and
regulations of the County or other regulatory agencies, the more restrictive provisions shall
govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code provislons will be met as a
minimum. The Comprehensive Plan itself indicates that it should be used as a re~erence source
and guide for making land use decisions. Comprehensive Plan, p. 2. The applicable "decision
guidelines" set forth in the Pla~l are to be used in determin~ng whether a particular proposal
should be approved, conditioned or denied.
B. The ~roaosed rezone, as conditioned, ~enerally con~orms with the Compreherlsive Plan: ~ ~
bears a substantial relationshi~ to and will not be detrimental to the public health, safetv an~
welfare; and comalies with the Spokane Coun~r Zanin~ Code and other a~plicable ~evelopment
ze~ulations.
Most of the site is desigr~ated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive P~an, with the
small easterly extension of the s~te being designated ~vithin the Major Colnmercia~ categary. The
Urban category recommends a residen.tial net density ran~e of 1 to 17 unlts per acre. The more
i~tensive uses in the Urban category, such as light industrial and nelghborhood commerclal, are
expected to be located near or along the heavily traveled streets. The least intensive single-
family residential uses should be isolate~ from the ~oise and heavy traffic, while m~Itifamily
structures will usually be a trans~tional use l~cated between sin~le-family residential and the
more intensive areas. See Comprehensive Plan, Sectio~l l, "P~rpose" ~nd "Detaile~ Defin~t~on".
The Staff Report does not cite the polici~s of tl~e Co~~prehensive Plan applicable to ~he project,
which are accordingly set forth below. ~
The Urban category includes ~he follo~~Tng rele~ant ~o~ls, objec~ives and dec~sion
guidelines:
Goal 1.1 .~ncourage a variety of housing ty~~es and dejlsrties.
Objective l.l.a Promote fill-in within established develo~ment arens and
existing outlying communities where utitities, arterials, schools and
communit~ facilities have already been established.
Decision Guideline 1.1,1 Urban c~evelopment will be approved in areas
having adequate power supplies, wateY, sanitary and sto~m sew~rs,
stt~eets, and school and~re seYVices, provided ~hat such development
meets the intent of other Objectives and Decisron Gicideli~aes of this
section.
Objective l.l.b Higher-density develop~nen~s such as multi fatnily and
mobile homes (manufactured homes) parks should be located with direct
or near access to the mc~~jor arterial systems rcrther than on interior
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-98 Page 4
►
neighborhood streets. Access to pubic transportation should also be
~ considered.
Objective l.l.c When multifamily dwellings are to be located ad1acent to
single fatnily aYeas, care~ful consideration must be given to the density and
designs of the multiple~ family development so as to ensicre pratec~ion of
the amenities of thesingle family c~rea.
Decision Guideline 1.1.2 Base net density for single family dwelling
areas and for multifamily dwelling areas may be increased tht~ough bonus
options, bon~us densi~ies, zero lot lines or similar methods whe~r meeting
the fill-in criteria. -
Decision Guideline 1.1.3 A multifamily dwelling structure exceec~ing
three (3) residential units oY a developmen~ of sicch structures oY
mani~factz~red homes (except those on single family lots) sh~uld:
a) locate adjacen~ designated arterials;
b~ locate neaY e,risting or planned public tra~sit rc~iites;
c) improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single f ccmily
arnenities.
Decision Guideline 1.1.4 A variety of clensities and resiclential trses
should be available to provi~e a freedom of choice to live in +UYban a~eas
with varying densitre~, comhinati~ns, or mix of ~ses (se~e deta'led Urb~~
definitions).
Decision Guideline ~.1.6 ~evelopment utilizin~ const~~~ction ~nethoc~s, ;
site planning and/or ~andscaping meth~d~s which are corisidered
innovatrve should be approved if the intent of .Plan C~bjective~s or• ~ecisio~x
Guidelines is mainta~ined~
Objective 1.2.a Support increased cluster developrnent~j•ovic~i~g fc~r open
spaces tivith the devetopment.
Ob~ jective 1. Z. b~r~sur~ adequate open space, recreational fac~lities and
parks for residential development.
~eclsion Gu~deline 1,2.1 Cluster ~levelopment proposals ~nay be
approved tivhen such~roposals aYe compatible with ne~rby developr~lent ~
and when tl~e oveYall defined Urbar~ density on the pr~oposal si~e is not
exceeded.
Decision Guideline 1.2.Z ~'he nee~l for rec~ec~tiorr and open spuce created
by residential developments should be met and ~e in conform~nce with
ordinances, plans anc~ policies prior to residential develo~ment appYoval.
Decision Guideline 1.2.2 The need for recreation and open space created
by residential developrnents should be met and be in conformance with ~
ordinances, plans, ar~d policies prior to residential developme~~ ap~roval.
~F Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-98 Pa~e 5
~ Decision Guideline 1.3.3 All Urban development proposals should
require public sanitary and storm sewer systems or interim sewer systems
to protect water quality.
Goal 1.5 Encourage a healthful and pleasing environmen~ in the
County s residential areas.
Objective 1.S.a 1Vew residential or m~ltiple family shoicld be buffered
from existing adjacent land uses where adverse effects may develop.
Decision Guideline 1.5.1 Bufferin~ and/or lundscaping wrll be used to
mitigate the differences between proposed developments and existing uses.
Decision G~ideline 1.5.2 Landscaping may be reqi~ired to pYOVir~e a
healthful and pleasing residenti~l ~nvif•onment.
Decisio~t' Guideline 1.5.4 Sidewal~JaciliPi~s will be required along
arterials connecting residential at•eas with community facilities and/oj•
commercial areas.
Object~~ve 1. S. d Residential areas s~~ould be drscoura~Pd ivi~thin hi h ~
noise level zones such as in the vzcin~iy of ~rir~orts, ruilraads an~
freeways.
.r
Objective 1~5. e YYhen a n~ighho~~hr~or~ ex~Lri~nces ~ressure f~~t• c~lange i~
characte~, such chanb e shall be perr~itted irpon appj-o~~-~iate r~vretiv.
k~ Objective I.S.f Consicle~ the pro~l~, especially height, nf the e~~isting
neighborhood when evalicating m~rltifarnlly ~'evelopm~nts.
Objective 1. S.g In many instances, mobile homes and multifamily
development may be appropriate to ~°enew r~.sidential areas.
Decision Guideline 1. S. 7~efore rrpp~~ovtn~ any mult~arr~ily hou~ ing or~
manufactured hom~ development~r~oposal.s, it. should be dPter~a~ined that
szcch development will enhance th~ r•esident~al charactej° or aest~etics, v~
will improve residential values of th~ area.
Objective 1.5.8 When determ~ning whe~,~er a proposal will change the
existing land use chc~racter of an ~~~ecc, factors to consider jnay ~nclude:
a) the stYUCture heibht ~f the prnposal in relation to s~r~ccture
height of nearby stricctu~~es, and
b) whether new struc~ures wlll have a positive or ne~at~ve impact
upon the neighborhood 's c~rchitec~ural character.
Decision Guideline 1, b. l Before larid ~~se pr~posr~ls ~~•e approved they
should:
a) conform to plans, policres an~ regiclation~ o~'C'ounty tivater•,
~-~E Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-2~-98 Page 6
t - . 'e~ • ~yh ~ ~ , ~
sewer, storm sewer, utility ancl speclal service distYicts;
'~h ' n b~ conform to County tra~.spor•tatlo'~ plans and policies; and
identi~y and take step.s to resolve sigrr~facant adver•se impacts
upon existing utll ilies, (i. e. water, sanitary and storm sewers,
utili~y, available a~d fr~ture energy reso~crces), and traffic systems
The Major Commercial category is intended for the development of commercial
uses, particular~y "community and regional shop~in~ centexs", and uses related to r~ajor traffic
corridors. The Major Commercial cate~ory discourages most residential uses. 4bjective 6.1.j
recommends that small-scale con~enience stares and c~mmer~;ial enterprises be considered
adjacent to residential neighbor~.oods. Decision Guideline 6.1.1 of the M.ajor Commercial
category states that store5 and co~uner~ial services established to serve residents within a few
blocks' radius may be considered compa~~~~e, an~ therefore appropriate, when located adj acent
to residential land-~use categories.
Decision Guideli~,e 6.1.8 ~ndi~ates that appropriately buffe~ed multifamily resgdential.
development compatible tivlth ex~sting a~ld potent~al comin~rcial a~tiviti~s ~ay be perrriitted as a
transitior~ between ~~igh ir~~e~~ity ~~~e~ and ~ov~~ ir~tensit~ ~ses. 'Th~ c~usterin~ a~ ~~ses, u~~en it
increases the cost~effectiveness of utilities ar~~lor trans~ortati~n is the prefer~ed co~nme~cial
develop~ent pattern. Dec~sion Guideline b.1.9. Buff~rin~ techniq~e5 may be required an the
peri~hery of adj acent land us~ cate~ories to ensure co~~atibll~ty. T~.s include separ~~ting
potentially incomp~~ible ~a~.d ~ses by dista.~ce, chang~~g ~e~~ity, larld~ca~i~g, screen~ng andlox
physical featuzes or s~r. uctures. Seg ~~omprehens~ve ~lan, definiti~~ of "transitional buffering"
and "~uff~ring" in glc►ssary~; anc~ ~J~c~sio~ Guidelx~e f.1.1 a.~~ fi. ~ 02.
Becau~e the site is desi~atec~ w~t~~ir~ ~~jacent ~a,~c~ ~se cate~oriess the "transitio:~
a~ea" guidelines of'the Cor~~reh~nsive ~'~an Introduc~ion m~~ apply tu th~ proposal. T~ie
transition policy all~ws tieve~opme~t ~y~~~ within the `s~~nge area" b~twee~ ~ro la~d ~se
categories to be consYdered as co~pa~ible ~rth the Co~aprehe~.s~ve Pla~ I~troc~uctio~ if ~t
conforms to the po~icies o~~ either ~atego~y, depending on the ~~npacts to t~e adjace~~ lanc~ use
category, the distance ~~~se iritr~d~s ~nto ~n adjacent cate~ory and ~~~e deci~~on ma~,,F's site
specific approval. This may include ~he ~se of bufferin~ techniques ori the per~meter of a
development to render nearby uses compatibie. See C~mprehensive P~a~, p. 11 ~.nd ~lossary
definitions of "trat~si~io.~.al area" ~~~~d "trar~sitional buffe~ing".
The applicant ~roposes to rezone the sile to the U~-22, a zo~e which specifically
implements the Urban cate~ory of t~.e Compreh~nsive ~lan. Th~ pu~~ose ar~d inten~ of the
~CJR-22 zone Is set forth in Zoning C~de 14~622.1 ~Q, as ~ollo~s: .
The purpose of ~he URWZZ zone is to set standccrds~ for the orderly development of resider~trul prt~p~~ty in a manr~er that pro~vides ~ desiYr~ble
livijz~ environment that is co~rlp~~i~le tivith surroicnding land uses and
assicj~es the protection o f pro~e~ty v~lues. 1~t i.s r~ctenderi that thrs zor~e be
icsed to add to the variety oj~hoi{s~~'rg ty~es and c~s an impler~~entation tQOI ~'or the Comprehensive plan t~rban Ca~e~o~v densitres. General c~earaeteYistics
o these areas include ccve~ roa~s, public sewer an~l water, accessibility ta f p
schools and libraYies, and c~ full line of ~public s~rvices including r~annP~'
fire protection and public tYansit accessi~ilit~. ~~fices are ,permi~tec~ in the
U~-22 zone in order to ~rovide sorne of the service needs ~enerated b~ 1ai~h-
HE Findings, Co~clusions and Decisio~a ZE-20-98 Pa~e 7
intensitv land uses. The hi~hest densitv residential zone, UR-22, is intendecl a, primarilv for multiple-f amilv dwellin,~s and is usuallv locc~ted ad~acent to
maior or secondarv arterials. It is used as a transition between low or
medium densitv multiple-familv uses and intensive comrriercial or low
intensitv industrial uses and to provide_~or hi~her densitv housin~ in
locations close to em~lovment, shoppin~ and malor transportation where
movements of ~eo~le can be handled e~~cientlv and with least overall
_ adverse irnpact.
;emphasis added~.
The applicant proposes to develop the site for professional or medical offices, and may
substitute a 14-unit multi-family development for the mos~ northerly office illustrated on the site
plan. The site is located adjacent to a Collector Arterial, which is located only 2~0 feet from a
Principal Arterial. The p~oposed offices will serve as a buffer bet~een the intensive commercial
uses located to the west and the duplex nelghbonc~~od zoned UR.-7 and UR•3.5 to the east.
Offices uses are typically closed on evenings and ~veekends. T~lis will like~y result in less impact
to the residential uses Iying to the east durin~ such hours, compared ta the mobile home project
approved previously. The offces will provide support services for the more intensive
commercial uses located along Sullivan Road, w~~ch implements the UR-22 zone and thereby
the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed offices will also provide services
for the residen't'ial neighborhood in the vicinity, im~lementing the 11~a~or Corrllnercial cate~ory.
The 14-unit apartment complex, if installed at the north end of the site, wi11 implement
both the Urban category and the Major Commercial cate~ory by providing transitian between the
intensive commercial uses to the east and the mediu~n density residentlal uses zoned UR-7 to the
east. The land lying north of the proposed apartmerlts is currently in open space in the form of an
~ u~developed park. The apartment complea is Iocated close to employment, shopping and the
maj ox transportation routes, as recommended for multi-family uses in the UR-22 zone and in the
CJrb an categor~ ~ ~ ~
~ ,
The proj ect wili be served by a high level of public services, including public sewer and
water, and modern utilities. The site is located inside the ~nterim urban growth area desi~ated
by the County pursuant to the Washington Growth Management Act. The project i.s proposed
within a established development area and meets the "fill-in" criteria referer~ced in the Urban
category where higher density is encouraged. See Comprehensive Plan, Glossary definition of
"fill-in development". The appl~cant ~ndicates that the height, bulk and character of the buildin~s
will be residential In nature. See Rezone Supplement submitted by Dwight Hume, p. 3. Th~
proposed 2-story height af the office buildings and apartment complex is reasonably compatible
with the 1.5-2 story height of the adjacent duplexes. The buildings will also be oriented away
from the duplexes lying to the west. The proposa~ is also buffered from the lan~ zoned tTR-3.5
and UR.-7 to the west and north by a sight-obscuring fence and wider than required landscaping
along the adj acent site boundaries.
The conditions of approval require the applicant to obtain a lot line adjustment if the
apartment complex is developed, since only one use type is allowed on a single parcel of land
under the Zoning Cade. The app~icant has not sought bonus density for the potential multl-
family development of the prope~ty, and is therefore limit~d to a density of 22 units per acre.
The net acreage of the lot containin~ such complex would have to be 27,720 square feet to
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-98 Page 8
, a ~ -
,
accom~nodat~ ~u~h rr~axl~n~rn ~e~~ity. ~~n~~ ~h~ p~~~ ect ~s ~ ~ 1 ~~ng at i~~ r~~~th ~nd, ~t v~ou~~
~ r~ ~i~e a~~u~herl e~~e~a~ion of a ro~~~a~~l ~`2 ~~~~et. ~'~e~~ ~imen~~ons ~ou~d f~t neat~ into ~ Y Y
tk~e area ~ying ~out~ of the "~OS" ~o~d ~hat ~b~~~ ~~e prapo,~ed o~~ice b~~~~~~g ~o ~e south on ~~e
s~~~ p~an.
Very Iittle publr~ co~.me~~ r~cei~red re~ardrn~ ~~e pr~~~c~. ~~e~~~~ ~f ~~ppart ~a~
recelved fron~ t~e o~ne~ln~an~ger a~severa~ p~ap~~ti~s ~r~ th~ ~u11iv~ ~~a~ ~a~~d~r in supp~rt
af t~e ~roject. ~~e ~e~~er date~ ~o~ ~~~r~ ~ac~~c ~ea~ Estate ~ampan}~. ~he on~~
appo~~t~~~ ~o ~he pro~ec~ ~as expresse~ ~y a re~iden~ ~iv~~g ~v~~ ~awn ~a~n t~e ~ite a~or~~
the north ~zde of~~lley~ay Av~nue. This ~~~~ude~ ca~~e~~.s o~er ~~creased ~r~f~i~ in the
vici~i~~r u~ith ~he ch~~dren pre~ent in ~.~e ~~ea ar~d t~~ I~~k ~~deu~~~~~ alo~~ ~I~~~~}~va~, ~n~
xn.cre~s~d t~affic c~n~e~~~~n b~~veen ~al~eyv~a~r and Pra~~~s Raad ~a ~he v~e~~. ~'hes~ concern~
~~re no~ ~upport~d b~ ~~pe~ ~e~ti~~ny on traffi~ ~a~et~ ar ca~a~z~y.
~h~~e the ~~a~ec~ ~r~~~ ~~crea~e p~a~ ho~r tr~f~'~c gen~rat~or~ ~xom ~~t~ ~ve~ the 1
~pace mo~i~e ~ar~e ~ar~, traffic gener~.tia~ be pr~rr~aril~ a~or~g ~a~~ey~v~~ ~~e~ue to~rard
~~~~iva~ ~oad and ~o~ a~ong ~al~ey~a~ the ~vest ~~~r~ ~in~~e~f~~ni~y de~e~~~~en~
predor~~nate~. ~e~ te~ti~no~y a~' ~v~~~~~ ~~~e. T~e ~oun~ ~ng~~~e~ no~ ~~~ue~t ~~e
ap~~icant to r~ake ~~her ~~n~~ove~ents ~o ~V~l~ey~r~}~ A~~n~e a~o~~ t~e f~~~ta~~ af t~e
d~~e~opr~~nt because i~ ~as r~c~~~l~r irr~p~oved ~ar t~e ~ao~i~~ p~a~~c~ app~~v~d ~~94.
'~he app~~c~nt i~ a~~o requ~~ed ta ~a~~~b~~~ $4, ~ 00 ~o t~e ~~~nt~ ~~r r~p~~~re~en~~ to ~~e ~oop
co~~g~~atlon a~ the ~ul~ivan ~aa~~~er~,ta~~ ln~e~~han~~ ~a ~he sou~h~~~~. ~e~ ~o~n~~
~~~in~er~n~ can~r~i~ns of approva~, ~f~ces a~e ~~px~all~r ~~~v traff~~ ge~e~a~~~s, an~ ~he
applica~~ i~ only ~z~pos~n~ ~4.~ot~ntxa~ ~u~~~-f~il~ ~~~i~~,. ':~i~ pro~e~t ~v~~j s~~i~can~l~
~rr~pact traf~~c s~~ety ~r c~p~~i~~ ~he ~~'ea.
~`he ~i~is~ar~ of~~~~ld~r~~ ~n~. Pla~in~ four~d t~~~ t~t~ pr~p~~~~ ~~~~ra~~y ~~r~"~r~n~~ ~a
~he pa~icies a~#he ~J~~~ c~t~gor~ a~d th~~ p~~~ec~ r~p~~~e~t~ ~h~ p~~os~ ir~t~~~ oft~e
~.T~-~~ ~on~ expre~~e~ ~n the ~~~~~~g ~ode, proj~ct con~`~~~n~ ~i~~ ~ot~~ t~~~ ~r~~~ cat~,~~r~r
and ~he N~a~ o~ ~a~nerc~a~ ca~~~ar~r~ The ~a~1~~ ~u~p~e~~r~~ ~ub~.~~t~~~ by th~ ~~p~ic~t's ~~~d
use ~ar~~~l~an~ al~o ~uppo~s t~~~ ~ons~s~e~rcy ~f th~ p~~ject ~~~t~ ~h~ ~~t~.~~~~~;~~~v~ ~~a.r~. Th~
~I'~~~C~ 1S I"~~5~~~~~.~ COI11~~~1~?~~ ~1~~1 ~~J~~~~~~ ~~1~ US~~a ~I~~ ~a~l h~~~ ~~~~~~~r ~en~ar~d ~`o~
C~I~lII1~~C1~~ S~I~11C~5 ~I~~ ~?O~~~l~~~~ ~7~L~~~~~ 1~1 ~~7~
The pr~cedur~l ~eq~i~e~n~n~~ of chapte~ 4~.~ ~ ~ R~~' ~nd ~h~p~~r ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,~p~~ane
~oun~~ ~od~ hav~ ~~~n z~~et. ~'h~ ~~ar~~.~ ~~~I~~$~~I' C~}~CL~.~'~ ~VI~~ ~.~1~~~~~ D~~~I'I"I~.1I]~~10I~
~~NO~ISI~~I~IC~I7G~ 15~~~~ D1~1~1~I~ ~~~~Il~~~~~ ~1~C~ ~~~Il~~~~. ~a a~~~~~e co~er~t~ v~~~e
~ec~~ved fro~~ pu~~i c a~enc~~~ tha~ v~ould ~ic~~~e a~eed ~"ox ~r~~hdra~r~~ ~~c~ ~~~~ron~r~~nta~ . ~~~SI~11~1~fiI~1~.
~D~C~1~10I75 ~I] t~l~ ~~1 ~~11~~ ~I'~~~I~ I~ ~OC~~~~ ~1~~~ C~~~~~~. ~U~S~~~I~~~~~~ ~~~C~ ~~o~e~v ~as ~as~ ~~n~~.
~n applyi~g t~e ~~ar~g~d ~prcur~s~~c~~ t~~t, ~our~~ h~~~ 1oo~ed ~t ~ ~r~~e~~ c~~ ~a~~tors,
~~.~Iudlr~g ch~nged p~~lic opir~~on, ~~~.~es land ~~e p~t~~~n~ i~ ~~e ~~ea of t~~ re~o~e p~'opo~~l,
and ch~r~g~s ~n ~~i~ ~~o~~er~y ~~~e~~', ~'he ~~n~r~~ ~~de refez~r~ce~ c~ia~~e~ "ec~~:~~i~, t~~hno~~~~cai or ~and u~e con~i~1o~~" a~ fa~to~~ th~t ~v~~~ su~po~t a r~zo~e. ~p~~a~ne ~ounty
~oning ~ade ~~c~io~ ~~.~a~.~~~ ~~~h~n~~on ~~~~ts h~~e ~o~ xeq~~~r~~ ~ 6d~~o~~" ~ho~in~
o~`chan~~. is fle~~~~e, a~d ~a~~ ~ase is to ju~~e~. o~~ fa~~~. ~~~sani v. ~'o~~~y
F~ndin~~, ~o~~~usia~~ an~ ~e~~~~a~a ~~-~~}-9~ P~~e ~
~'or~r~iss~on~rs, 7~ ~n. A.pp. 3 S~, 3~4 ~ 1993}. Recer~t ~a~e~ ha~r~ hel~ ~~~t c1~a~ged ~
; cx~~ur~stances ar~ not requ~~ed for a~ezor~e ~f ~h~ propo~ed re~one ~mple~e~ts p~licies ~~'a
cor~prehen~ive p~~n. ~~jarn.~on, a~ $4G; Sa~e ~t~r ~ural ~nvir~~rner~t v. ~'no~o~ni~h ~~~rn~y, ~9
! ! ~d~~ { r! ~ 4l~~+~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vr.+~• r ~
~~s~u~sed a~a~e, t~.~ ~~QpO~a~ 1~ ~~~~T~.~I~ C~r~Sl~tent ~vit~ th~ ~~r~p~~~~~~1~~ ~~~n.
~'here ~s a~p~e e~vi~en~e af ~har~ged con~i~~on~ xn ~he a~e~ ~in~e th~ ~a~~ z~nin~ of t~ie ~~~e,
~~1C~L~~lI~~ ll~~~'~~~~~ ~I'~~~~C c~~iC~ CO~Tl~'1~~'CI~I ~~~I~~ ~ U~~~~I~l F~4~~ I1~ ~i`~~, th~
~~~e~s~on of pub~i~ se~r~r ~o the area, V~1C~~111~~ ~Ul~1V~~I F~O~~, and cor~s~~~ra~~e ~e~o~~~;
~ctxv~ty for cornmerc~~~ de~v~l~p~~~~ ~~o~~ ~U~~IV~I~ ~O~C~ 1~. 1~1C1~]I~~, ~.s c~~ed ~n page 2 of
the ~~a~'f~epo.rt. ~~so see p, 1 of ~~z~ne ~~~p~etn~~~ s~~~~~t~ed D~i~ht ~-~ur~~,
X~~t ~]~~~~~DN
Ba~ed on ~~e ~~ndin~~ ofFact an~ ~~~~~~.~~o~~ a~o~~, t~e db0'~e ~.~~~i~~~10n ~Qr ~~On~
rec~as~~#~cati~~ ~s h~reby ap~pro~~d, su~jec~ t~~e candi~~on~ a~the vari~u~ pu~~ic a~~n~~es
specif~e~ ~~~o~.
~'~1~ur~ t~ ~o~p~~ ~v~th ~h~ c~r~~~t~~~s o~` t~~ ~~p~ova~ ~a~r ze~u~t r~voca~~on c~~ ~h~~
a~p~o~r~l ~y the.~eari~~ Examir~e~. T~s ~p~~ov~~ d~es nat ~ai~re ~he app~~~a~~'s ~b~i~~t~~~ ~a
~o~np~y with al~ o#~e~ requi~e~n~r~t~ ~f ot~~~ ~~er~c~~~ ~~ith juri~di~ti~r~ ove~ de~elopzn~~rlt.
~
SP~~A1~C~ C~~~~'~ D~~~~I01~ A~D ~'~~1~~~~
Al~ conditl~~~ i~np~s:d ~y t~e ~~~ar~n~ Fxam~~r~e~ ~h~1~ be ~ri~di~~ o~ the''1~~~~i~~~",
~hi~h ~err~ ~ha~l ~r~c~ude the de~e~r~p~ra o~~~r or ~~n~r~ a#' t~~ pr~per~y, a~~ ~~~1~~, a~~z
a~d ~u~ce~sor~.
_
~~~ie ~ane ch~~~e ~~pi~e~ to th~ fo~~~~~ir~~ r~a~ ~raper~y: '~'he Ea~t 5~ f~e~ o~ t~a,e ~est % r~~'
~'ract 5G of'~era, accordin~ to ~~at recarde~ ~Vo~ume o~"P~ats, ~a~e 3~ ~n ~po~an~
~our~t~, ~ash~n~to~. ~'og~ther witl~ t~~ ~~'~~~t fee~ of the ~a~t 'f~ a~'~'ra~t S~ ~f ~~ra~ Al~a
Tc~gether ~T~~h the f~~~~v~ing de~c~~ed pa~~e~: T~~ ~~st 5~ ~eet af t~~~ ~~e~t ~ 31 f~~~ ~~'t~~ ~as~
'~z of ~T~r~ct 5G of ~era; E~cep~ ~~ie Nor~~i ~ ~ ~ ~'~~t a~a~ a~~o ~xce~~ ~~ie ~o~~h 1
`~he propa~a~ ~~ail ~~mpl~ ~i~~ ~~e ~r~~~ ~.~~xdent~a~~~~ ~L~R~,2~} ~~~e ~t~~ o~~~~ pr~~~~i~ns
of the Spokan~ ~~u~ty ~or~z~g Code, as a.~~~~~d.
4. ~'h~ a~p~~cant ~ha~l ~~veiop ~~e ~ub~e~t prc~pert~ in accarda~ce ~~ri~h t~~ si~~ ~~ar~ o~f ~eco~d
~D~VIS1~1~ Q~BL~~~C~I~~ ~~C~ P~~l~"l~~1~ C~~~~ 5~~~~ ~~C~~~J~x ~ 99~~ pre~~n~~;~ to t~~ ]~ear~ng
~~a~i~er ~n ~pr~~ ~ 4,1 ~99. 11~~~a~ ~aria~~on~, ta ~e ~pp~o~e~ ~y th~ ~}irec~o~ of t~e ~i~lsio~
~ui~d~n~ ar~d Pla~~~~1d~~i~e~, shal~ b~ ~~~owe~ ta ~~e~ ~e~~t~a~ion ~tar~~a~~s ar~~ ~~nd~~ia~~ ~~f
approval. AI1 ~ar~atior~s r~~st c~n.~'orrn ~~~~~at~c~r~~ set in ~he Spo~Ca.n~ ~~~~.~y ~a~~n~
~ode, and the ~r~~~~a~ ~n~e~at ~f de~elap~~~~.~ ~~a~~ ~hal~ ~e rraa~~tain~a.
Ap~~o~ral ~s r~quired f~a~ the D~~e~~or ~~f ~~e D~visi~r~ of B~a~~d~n ~ a~~d ~~a~~~~gldesi~r~~e
o~ ~ speci~"~c li~~l~ll1~ ~I1C~ ~I~I]l~~ ~~~I~ ~Q~` ~~S~~'l~~d proper~y pri~r t~ re1~a~~ ar~y .
bui~d~n~ pern~~~.
F~nd~n~~, ~onc~~~~an~ and De~i~~o~ ~E-~~~98 ~~.~e
~
.
6. ~ Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
7. If the property is developed with all office uses, a lot line adjustment to aggregate the two
parcels shall be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit. If the property is developed
into both office and residential uses (apartments), the applicant shall modify the property
boundaries in such a manner to ensure the offices (public and semi-public use) and the
apar~ments (residential use) are on separate parcels.
8. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spoka~e County
Auditor a Title No~ice noting that the property in question is subj ect to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The T~tle Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as aliowed for an appeal and shali only be
released, in full or in part, by the Division of Buildir~g and Plarming. The Title Notice shali
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as ; insert legal description] :~is the sub~ect of a
land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on Apr~11441999, pmpasing a
variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-20-98 is available for i~spection and
copying in the Spokane County Division of Buildi~g and P~annimg.
9. The Spokane County Division of Building and Plar~ning shal~ prepare ~nd reco~~d tivith t~~
Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice specifying road right-of way and utilities. ~'~~e ~eserved
~.ture acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in pa~, by the Spok~e County
Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice should be recorded within the sar~e ttme
frame as allowed for an appeal and shall generally pro~ide the fol~owing:
a. A strip of property 12.5 feet in width shall be set aside as ~eserved future ~cquisition.
area for road right-of way and utilities, in addition to the existing un~lor newly dedicated
right-of way along Valleyway.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
be measured from the reserved future acquisitian area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfie~d Qr ~llowed sigr~s shauld be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of wa~ a~d utilities. If any of ~he
above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the appiicant's
expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private proper~y and may be used as
allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscapin~~, parki~~, sur~ace drainage, drainf eld, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
~ e. The property owner shall be responsible for reloca~~~~ suc~ "~nterim" improvements at
the time Spokane County makes roadway impro~rements after acquirir~~ said future
acquisition area.
10. ?'he multi family development portion of the project, if developed, shall be lim~ted to a
ma.cimum of 14 irnits and shall not exceed a maxitnum density of 22 units per ac~e.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-:~0-98 Pa~E~ 11
!
11. The buildings in the project shall be lirnited to a height of two stories, as defined b the •
y County Zoning Code.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIDN OF ENGINEERING
l. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
2. Access permlts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the rounty Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. All required improvements sha~l conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicab~e county standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commiss~oners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
7. No construction work is to be perforrned within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road r~ght of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
8. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley ~Vay as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The
existing one half right of way width, measured from centerline, of 30 feet is not consistent with
that specified in the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recorn~nended that a
strip of property 5 feet in width along the Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve, This
property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made
to Valley Way.
9. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either under~round or
ovezhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County w111 assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20-98 Page 12
~
~
Pe~ ~he ~I~N~ t~e app~~can~ h~~ r~~de a~~l~ntar~ contribut~an a~ $4 ~~4.~~ ~a t~e Sullivan
°~~o~dII~9~ Int~rchar~g~ fo~' ~~npraverr~ents ta the ~oop rar~p. At ~~i~ tir~e t~e es~~mate~
C~~1~~~'[.1C~1Q~1 1S . -
11. Road and dr~.inag~ pl~.~ for Va~~ey ~a~ a~~ pr~v~te r~ad ~~ans far ~entu~ Lan~ ~ver~
p~epare~ p~r ~~-~~-9~.
S~~~AI~~ ~~~~NA~ ~~~T~ ~]I~~'RI~~'
T~e ~e~a~e di~~osa~ ~ne~hod s~a~~ ~e as ~u~~ori~ed by ~he ~Jxre~fior of U~~~i~ies for ~pakane
~~unty. , -
~afer ~e~vice ~~a~~ be ~oord~nated ~~rough ~he D~r~~tor of ~ti~~t~e~ far ~pa~ane Co~~~~,
3. ~at~r ~e~~c~ sha~l ~e by a~ exis~ing ~~blic wa~e~ s~pp~}~ ~vhen ap~ro~e~ by ~he ~egzana~
En~ineer ~Spo~an~}, ~ta~~ Depart~n~nt of H~a~t~,
4, A ~7Z.1~~1C S~W~~ ~~~~~IT15~~~~ Ix7~C~~ ~V~1~~~~~ ~0~' t~~ ~Ct ~I]~1~1C~U~~ ~~~V1~~ V~1~~
p~~~1d~~ to eaC~] ~Qt pr~~~ tD Sa~e. T~e u~e ~ndt~idual o~~s~~~ ~ewa~e dispa~a} ~~stems ~~a~~
no~ be au~hor~~ed.
5. T~e u~e of priv~~~ ~ve~~~ an~ ~~~er sy~~e~~ is p~ohib~ted.
- SP~~NE ~~~JNT~ D~'~~~~~N ~]'~~~~~'~E~
1~ ~~t ~l~~e~ ~e~rer co~ect~on ~o th~ area-~ride publi~ se~u~r ~y~ter~ ~h~~~ be con~~ructed. A
sev~er can~ectlo~ perrr~it ~s ~eyu~re~, A~p~~can~~ f~~ co~mercia~ p~rm~t~ ~~.all ~~br~it h.istorical
a~dlar e~t~~~~~d ~a~er us~.ge priar ~a the x~s~an~~ of ~~e cor~ec~~~n per~nit xn ~rd~r to e~~abli~h
sewe~ fee~.
~'he app~z~~nt sha~l ~~~mit expres~~~ to ~he ~pol~ane ~~un~~ ~tilit~~s Di~~~ion, "u~der
separa~e ~o~~r", on~~ ~ho~e p~~~ sh~e~~ s~o~vz~g ~e~er p~~r~~ ar~d spec~f~ca~~ons ~`or pub~i~ sew~~
car~nec~~ons and ~'aci~ities far revi~w an~ appr~~a~~ ~o~erc~a~ de~re~opmer~~~ ~hall ~ub~ni~
h~~tori~al ar~dlo~ e~tima~~d ~a~e~ usage as part of ~~e ~e~ver p~a~ ~ubmitta~,
3, ~e~ver accept~ble ta t~e D~vi~~on ofUti~~~res sh~Il ~e ~u~~ni~~ed pr~~r ta the ~~~uar~ce
o~' ~he s~~v~r con~~ruc~ion perr~n~t.
4. Ar~y ~ate~ se~~ce fo~ thi~ ~~~j~c~ ~ha~i be ~ra~ided in acco~dar~ce ~~~h ~~e ~oo~d~nat~d
~a~ex Sy~~err~ Plan ~pakan~ Coun~~, as am~~ded.
Findin~~, ~onclu~~~n~ and ~eci~io~ ~~-~~-98 Page 13
~
~~~h C~~~ 0~ ~
~S~~~AN~ ~~~]N'~Y H~A~IN~ E~A~VII~~~
~
M~c~ael De~n~se~, ~s~A #8~
N~TZC~ OF F~N~~ D~C~S~~~ ~ND I~~~'~C~ ~I~~'~ T~ AP~EA~
P~rsu~nt t~ ~pokane ~ounty ~es~lu~~o~ ~o~. 9~-~~ 7~ a~d 9~-0~32, the deci~~o~ of ~he
Hearin~ Ex~n~~ner on an ~pp~icat~~n ~or a~one ~eclass~ficat~an and ac~o~~anyin~ ~~~A
d~~erm~~a~zon ~na~ ar~d ~onclu~ive un~e~s ~~t~in ~ ~ ~a~endar days from ~he E~arrliner' ~
v~~~ter~ ~ecis~~n, a~~r~~ of rec~rd ag~rieve~ ~uch dec7sion f~es an a~~ea~ ~i~~ the Boa~~ of
~ounty ~amrn~~~~on~rs ~f Spakane ~our~t~, ~a~~ir~g~on. ~a~vev~~, ~~.7~8. ~ ~9~
~nd~~a~es that ~~n~in~~tr~t~~e a~peals of ~aunt~ lan~ u~e d~cisio~s an~ ~~~A a.ppea~s ~hal~ be
fi~ed ~ith ~1~~ b~ard ~f coun~y c~mm~~sior~er~ ~vit~in fa~~teen ~ r~} ~al~nd~r day~ af the da~~ of
th~ de~is~o~.
T~~ dec~~ia~ wa~ n~ailed ~y ~er~~fied r~a~~ ta the 1~pp~~c~.n~ or~ Apr~l ~9, ~999,
~]~~~~~~N~ ~N ~~CH A,~~EA~ P~R~O~ ~~ERENC~D A~~~ ~,~~AL~Y
A~P~~~~, AP~~A~~ ~~,~~~N~ ~]A~~'~ ~~T~~~ ~A~ 7, ~ 99~ ~R ~VIA.~ ~ ~ ~99.
~'l~e ca~ple~e ~ecord z~ thi~ ~a~te~, xnclu~~n~ t~~~ decis~o~, is on ~le during the appeal ~~riad
V~~~~ ~~1~ ~~~1C~ ~~~~1~ ~~~I`lI]~ EX~17iII3~I', Th~rd ~1oor, Public ~`o~k~ ~~~l~ir~g, ~e~t
~r~ad~vay ~venue, ~pa~ane, ~a~hingto~, ~92~~-~~4~, ~5~9} ~24-3~9~. ~'h~ ~~e ~ay be ~r~spec~ed
dur~n~ ~o~mal ~rork~ng h~urs, ~tsted a~ 1V1and~~ -~'r~da~ of e~c~ ~ve~k, exce~~ hoZl~a~s, bet~uee~ t~e
hours a~` 8:~~ a.m. an~ 4:~~ p,r~. ~op~es off~~ docur~en~~ in the recQ~d will be ~ade ~.v~i~able a~
cost set by ~po~ane ~oun~r ~rd~r~ance.
~~ndin~s, ~~nc~usi~ns and ]~e~isro~ Z~~~~-98 Pa~e ~ ~
~ ~ ti . ENGINEER S REV~~V~ SHEET
Project St~tus Actrve
,~s Duilt Plans Received Rezone File ZE'~~2~'~g '98
Road Plans Approved Companion Files:
New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Related Files:
Hc~ring: 04/14/1 ~99 49:00 Building Dept:
'I'echnical Review: 12/17/1998 42:15
Preliminary Rcview: Type: Large Lot ~ Bldg. Square Feet
Date Receivcd: 12104/199$ No. Lots: No. Acres: 2
Project Name UR-7 TO UR-22 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ~
Site Address ' ~ ~
~ ~l Range-Ta ip-Section: 44 - 25 -14 PARCEL(S): (first 18)
Applicant Conditions Mailed: l; 45144.1132 45144.1142
Dwight J Hume Flooci Zone No
Water Source Public 107 S. Howard St , 325 Sewer Saurce
SPOKANE, WA 94244 School Dist 356
Ph~ne Fax Fire Dist l
(~Q9) 45G-7402 (509) 45b-7357 phone Dist
Owner Surveyor
Paul S Redlin Charles E Simpson
SIMPS~N ENGINF.ERS INC
Po Dox 2~4 909 N. Argonne Rd VERADALE, WA 49037- SPOKANE, WA 99212-2789
Phone Phone Fax
(509) 92?-9185 (509) 926-1322 (509) 926-1323
Building Ph: 456-3675 / Pianning Ph: 45b-2205 Contact: STAGY aJORDAHL
Date Submitte Description Initials Ol/l l/1999 Eng Necil Techni~ally Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation ~
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Traflic Analysis Eng Need Other
Eng Pay ~ees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Campleted
Copy to Accounting Eng Priority Fees Received ~
/ ~ Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Completed - or Needs tu be signed
Design Deviation Dates (In-0ut}
I l - 1 I 1 I - 1 ! I I - 1 i
I 1 / l / 1 I I
I / l / T~an~ quannes tor I ~ drainage ~tem calculatec~
~ Iearing Date Decision App Den Cond Appld DCC
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appid Court
Appealed to Court ~cision Anp Den Cond Appld
/ / Stamped Mylars ta Secretary (Sand~~}
j / Stamped 208 l.ot Plans to Secretary (Sandr~)
_J
i~ Airr~ll~rM '
~ 7 . ,
~
STAF~ REP~RTTO THE HEARING EXAMINER .
. File ZE-20-98 ~
- .
DiV1SI0N OF ~E1ILDONG AND PLANNING
S~o~~~~ ~~t~~rr~
HEARING DATE: April 14, 1999 @ 9:00 a.m. FILE ZE-2U-98
PROJECT PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahi, Senior Plan~er
PROJECT DESCRiPTION: A request to rezone approximately 2 acres from Urhan Residential-
7~UR-7) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22} for the purpose of developing medical and professional
offices. The site plan of record also indicates that a 14-un~~ apartment building may be
constructed in lieu of one of the office buildings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval af the zone change sub;ect to
conditions of approval.
Pro~ect Da~a
. ~ r
Project Location: Generally Incated north of ~nd adjacent to Vail~yway, - approximateEy 2?_0 feet ~ve~t of Sulliv~n Road, within
. . the SE1/4 of S~~ T25 ~44.
Parcel Number(s): 45144.1132 and 45144.114~
0~►~ner: Paul S, Redlin
~ ~ PO Box 244
- ~ Veradale, WA 99037 . ,
~ ~ Ken Red(in
PO Box 13156
~ . Spokane, WA 99213-3156
Agent: Dwight Hume
. . 107 S. Howard, Suite 32~
: ~ y Spokane, WA 99201
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Urban and Commercial
Zoning: ~ . ~ . Urban Residen~ial-7 Existing Land Use: The site is curren~ly undeveloped, except for a 5~nit
storagelgarage structure which is located along the
east property line. Portions of the s;te are
- landscaped and the per~meter af the site is fenced. ~
two-lane paved private access road runs along the
east proper~y (+ne and serves the site.
Surroundin~ Zoning and l.and Uses:
• Nort~: The zoninc~ nor~h of the site is Urban Residentia!-3.5 and is an undeveloped uacant piayfield.
• South: The zoning south of the site is Jrban Re~identi~i-3.5
~ and Regional gusiness ~~-3). i he area south is
developed wit~ residenrial and business uses.
zE-Za-9s
Staff R~port - April 14,199~ H~arinc~ 1 of 6
. .
East: . The zoning to the east of the subject property is a mix
~ of Community Business (B-2} and Regionai Business ~ - -(6-3). The prc~perty to the east, along Sullivan Road,
~ - - is developed with cammercial and office uses. A
. church is also located east of the subject property
. ~ - . along Sullivan Road.
West: ~ The zoning west of the subject property is Urban
~ Residential-3.5 and Urban Residential-7. The land
- - immediately west of and adjacent to the subject
~ property is developed with 2-story duptexes. Known Land Use Proposals and The most recent rezone actions in the area include:
Recent ProjectApprovals in the 1) A rezone of the subject property from Urban
Area ofi this Project Residential-3.5 to Urban Residentiaf-7 for an
~ , eleven space manufactured home park was
approved by the Board of County Commissione~s
on February 1,1994. (File No. ZE-27-93).
2) A rezone of approximateiy 1.1 acres from Urban Residential-3.5 to Community Business (B-2)
was approved by the Board of County
Commissioners on December 14,1993. ~File No.
ZE-28-97}. This rezone was located south of and
adjacent to Valleyway, approximately 250 feet
- east of Sullivan Road.
- 3) A rezone of approximately acre from ~ - Neighborhood Commercial (B-1) to Region~l
- B~siness (B-3} was approved by the HP~ring
~ . E~caminer on Navember 18,1997. (File No. Z~-
~ - 3-97). This rezone was located east of and
. adjacent to Sulfivan Road, approximately 630 feet
~ ~ south of Broadway Avenue.
- ~ 4} A rezone of appr~ximately 2.5 acres from . ~ ~ _ ~ Community Business (6-2} to Regional Business
(B-3) was orall~ approved by the Nearing ~
~ _ Examiner on December 2, 1998. (File No. Z~-4-
. . 98). This rezcne was located at 16011 E.
, ~ Sprague, approximately 3/ mi(e from the subject
- - ' - property. ~
~ ~ 5) A rezone of approximately 29,000 square feet ~ from Community Business ~B-2) to Regional
~ - - ~ ~ - Business (B-3) was approved by the Hearing
~ ~ ~ . . Examiner per letter dated July 16,1998. (File No.
. ~ ~ - ~ ~ - . , , ~ ZE-58-97). Thos rezone was located at 158~ 3 E.
. Sprague, approximately'/2 mile from the subject
~ ~ - ~ - ~ proper~y.
Land Division Status: ~ The proposal inclu~es two platted lots of record.
Shoreline Designation: - NIA
Water Purveyor: ~ Vera Water and Power.
Sewage Disposal: ~ Public sewer is avai(able to the site.
Fire District ~ Fire District # 1
School District: The proposal is located within the Central Valley
~ . School District.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The site is adjacent to Valleyway which is designated
~ ~ as a Collector Arterial on the Spokane County Arterial
zE-2a-9s
Staff Report - Apri114, 1999 Hearing 2af6
, ; y ' ~ . ~ 1 t' i rni ' W.JMI.
• ~ l~
~ . - . ~ _ ~ - - = _ R~ad Nfan. Su~livan Road is located approximately
~ ~ 220 teet east of the subject property. Suiliva~ Ro~ad
~ ~ is designa~ed a5 a Principal Arterial on the Spoka~e
~ ~ County A~~t~ria~ Road Plan. In order to implemen~ fhe . ~ Plan, the Spokane County Engineer has
~ recommended that 12.5 feet of property be set aside
~ . as Future Acquisition Area along Valleyway.
Nearest Parks and Distance: The Spokane Coun~y Parks and Recreation Plan
. _ identifies Suilivan as the County park facility located
nearest fio ~he proposal. Su~livan Park is located
. approxi~nately one mile north of the proposa~.
Neighborhood Associa~i~n: None identified.
• This proposal is located insP~de the IUGA.
~ This proposal is located ins~de a Public Transportation Benefot Area ~PTB~1).
• This proposa~ is located o~u~side the 1000' notification boundary of designa~ed Natural
Resource Lands.
GMAICritical Areas
T - . Aquifer Recharge-Area (PSSA /AS~A): ; The proposal is Iocated witf~in the Prior~ty
~ , - . ~ - - ~ ~ Sewer Service Area and ~he Aquifer
- - - ~ - - ~ Sensitive Area
Fish & Wildlifie Habi~at Conserv~~o~ Areas: None identified on Spokane Coun~y Critic~l
~ ~ - ~ Area~ maps
Floodplain: ~ - I~one identified
Geologically Hazardous Areas: - None identifi~d on Spokane County Cn~ica! . - ~ - - - Area maps
Wetlands: ~ _ ~ ~ None identif ed on Spokane Count~ Gritical
, _ Area lr~~ps or SpokanP County Wetland
_ - - lnventor~ maps
:
SEPA
• Mitigated DNS issued on March 26, ~999.
• Comment period en~ed on Aprii 12,1g99.
The Mitigated DNS requires the applicant to mitigate projected tr~affic impacts ~o t~e Sullivan
Road/lnterstate-90 Interchange. The applicant has vo~untarily agreed to contribu#e ~~~e sU~n vf
~4,104.00 to mitigate the project's ir~p~cts to the Su6livan ~oadllnt~rstate-90 Interchange.
Noticin~ ~ .
Published: The Spokesman-Review on March 29,1999 (by department)
Mailed: Notice mailed to properrt~ owners on March 25,1 ~99 ~oy applicant).
Site Pos~Ed: March 25,1999 (by ~ppiicant)
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted ~Counter Complete}: Decer~ber ~,1998
Technically Comp~e~e 1 Determina~ion of Completeness issued: F~bruary 1,1999
Date Notice of Decision is Due: ,~une 1,1999
ZE-20-98
Sta~ Report - Apri114,1999 Hearing
3of6
. •
Reviewinq Aqencies ` `
Thirteen agencies were notified of the proposaf on December 4, 1998 and March 17,1999. Comments were
due on December 17,1998 and April 1,1999, respectively.
Agencies Noti#ied Response Date of Agencies Notified Response Date~of ~
. Received Document _ Recefved ~ ~ Document
County Engineering yes 12/8198 County Engineering yes 111199
(Development Services) {Transportation} 3117199
416199 Regional Health District yes 12/17f98 Long Range Pfanning yes 12114198
3124/99 Division 3122/99
County Utilities (land use) yes 411/99 Stormwater Utili~y no
Spokane County Air yes Spokane Regional no
Pollution Controi Authority Transportation Council
Fire District # 1 yes 121~0198 yes
Vera Water and Power no Central Valley SD no
Spokane County Parks no Spokane Transifi no Authority
Responses from the Public:
One letter was received in response to the Notice of Application. The letter expresses support of
the proposed rezone.
Descri~tion of the Site:
The site is rectangular in shape with 130 feet of fron~age aiong Vaafeyway. The s~t~ is currently
undeveloped, except for a 5 unit storagelgarage structure which is ~ocated along t~e east
property line. Portions of the site are landscaped and the perimeter of the site is fenced. A two~-
lane paved private access road runs along the east property line and serves the site.
Backqround:
The proposed rezone was submitted to the Qivision of Building and Planning on Uec~mber 2,
1998. A technical review mee~ing was conducted on December 17,1998 wherein the applicant
~was informed that the application was "technically incomplete". The application was deemed
technically complete on February 1,1999. A~lotice of Application ~vas issue~ on
February 1, 1999 with a public comment period ending on February 15, 1999.
StaffAnalysis:
Project Description:
The project includes a zone reclassification of tv~o (2) acres from UR-7 to UR-22 far d~velopment of inedica! and professional offices. The site plan of record also indicates that a 14-unit
apartment building may be constructed in lieu of one of the office buildings.
Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan designation for the proper~y is Urban and Major Comme~cial.
The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"citylike" ~
environment, including a variety of Eand uses served by a high level of public facilities and
services (paved roads, public sewer and water, storm sewer systems, police and fire protection
and other features}. 1t is primarily a residential category of single-family, two-famify, multifamily
and condominium buildings; along ~vith neighborhood commercial, light industrial uses, and public
and recreational facilities. The Urban category suggests that the more intensive uses such as
commercial and industrial should be located ne~r the heavily traveled streets with the less~
intensive residential uses located on local access streets away from the noise and heavy traffic
ZE-20-98
Staff Report - April 14,1999 Hearing
4of6
. ~
associated with commercial and industrial develo~ments.' The Urban category does not have any
goals, objectives or policies that specif~~ally ~ertain to office development in the Urban category.
With regard to services that are typically provided for developments located within the Urban
category, this site will be served by public water and sewer, and is Iocated adjacent to an arterial.
The Major Commercial category is intended to provide the opportunity fo~ development of
commercial uses, specifically communi~y and regional shopping centers and commercial uses,
directly related to major throughways. The Major Commercial category wil~ be composed of three
different types of commercial development, shopping centers, highway and arterial commercial
strips, and freeway commercial.
Most commercial development will be on ~elatively flat land and buildings will be of a law profile.
Paved parking, streets and man-made structures will dominate the site, w'rth few natural features
to be found. Landscaping, screening, lig~ting, signage and other architectural treatr~ent will
provide for aesthetically pleasing devefopment.
Major commercial areas require a ful! line of public services and utilities. These include service
by and commitment ta, sanitary and storm sewers, public water systems and underground utilities
such as telephone, gas and electricity.
The Major Commercial category does not have any goals, objectives or policies that specifically
pertain to office development in the Ma~or Commercial category. With regard to services that are
typically provided for developments located within the Major Commerciar category, this site will be
served by public water and sewer, and is located adjacent to an arterial.
Zoning Analysis:
The applicant has requested a rezone of approximately 2 acres from UR-7 to UR-22. The UR-22
zone is intended to implement the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan.
The purpose of the UR-22 zone is to set standards for the orderly development of residential
property, however offices are permitted in the UR-22 zone in order to provide some of the service
needs generated by high-intensity land uses. ~
Site Development Plan Review:
Two of the proposed office buildings are illustrated as two-story structures that inc(ude 5,400
square feet per building. The third offce building ~located at the nor~h end af the site) is designed
with a 7,150 square foot footprint. The required number of parking stalls will depend on the type
of office space that is developed within ~ach individual building. Medicai and dental offices
require one space per 170 gross square feet and professional offices require one space per 350
square feet. The site plan indicates the buildings will be constructed as two-story structures. The
maximum building height in the UR-22 zone is 50 feet. The landscaping provisions of the Zoning
Code require twenty ~20) feet of Type lil landscaping along Valleyway. There is existing
landscaping on site that may be used to help satisfy this requirement. Twenty feet of Type I~
landscaping is required along the north property line between the proposed UR-22 zone and the adjacent UR-3.5 zone.
Any signage for the office buildings shall comply with the UR-22 zone.
The proposal is generally consistent with the development standards of the UR-22 zone. The site
plan submitted by the applicant is considered by the Division of Building and Planning as general
in nature, with detailed review to occur administratively during the building permit review process.
ZE-1.0-98
Staff Report - April 14,1999 Hearing 5 of 6
. • t 1
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the rezone request subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
Attachments:
A. Maps (vicinity, comp plan, zoning, site development pian}
6, Agency Comments
C. Conditions of Approval
zE-zo-9a Staf~ Report - April 14, 1999 Hearing
6of6
1 ~
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
ViCINITY MAP
COMPREHENSiVE PLAN MAP
ZOt~ING MAP
SITE PLAN
. . , o ~ ~
1 ~ ~ `
~ ~
~ • •
a
~
. :
~ ~ 1,~ + ~ -
~ , . .
~ ~ ~r,E
\ : 4 _ 1 ~ ` ` ` i~ . ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~`.``M1 , ,
- ~ , ,Q i - . . • • ~ , ;
' ~ - ~ ~
. ~ ~ - . r~~
~ , ~ • ..s~A~ _ . . _ _ _ `~C. ,,,T,..,,., _ ` _ • ~ ~ , .
_ ``~,.~t
~ ~A V,~,~N V ~ ~ ` . - '
-~L,•- - ~
• I T 1 'Q
~ , i..z.~.t. , , A ; : ` , u 3 . . ~ < _ . ~r
~ ~ _ . ~ . .,s ~ ~ i, . ) ' ~ i p • ~ '
• J ~ ~ ~ ' ~ {
~ ~ l ' ~ I K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
• { ~ ~ 4'~Ci 6 . .
o . ~ e 0 ~ + . ~ J ' ,
ii ~ ~ 4 r ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .::..~:~.:~t- Y ' ' ~ ;
. ~ ~r . ~ ~ • ~ E t~ F~ C~~` y V F. •
~ ~~=~''t~ ~ I "T , . . ~''t'~ . ~.".~.~1.~'° 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~
~ ; ~ ' S .p~,.~ i ~ ~ ' ' ' i( ~t._. S t a' 1 p r; . 0 9 r t 5 s, s~
, 3c hoo i ~ ~ . , . , ~ . . J, ~ d . ' . . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ •,~~Ct r,Q ~ r~'L , - Q 0 , . ~
~ ~ S'c -^d , , a . ~ ~
~ ~ a • 1 ' ~ n
. ~ d ' , ~A~
y . . . ~ .r..~ ' ti.+-~.~.~ r' ~ ..1.rJ ~ 1 i ~ . ~
~"r'r~'r"'y„10 N , z .
> C ~
~ ~ ~ ~ '✓'AilJ ~ ~ ~ N i , - - . . ~ - _ _ ..r-. ~
1~ E ~ r ~ ~ , ~
. ~ ~ , , J C R~Y~
L ,~y~ _ 5 p~,~u ~ ~ ~ ~
. v ' . ~ . f 1 ~ 1 ~ • ~ ~ ~ • ~t L < < • ~..1~T"I. ~ ~ ~+P; 1 -r~'., • ~ ' , r • . ~.d J ~
~ ` J
7 v r v~E ~ a~ L E ~ ~ ; ~ .
z N p v , _ ~ ; _ _ _ _ ~ r~ ~ , -
_ ~ _ . _ . . _ . ~
Not to Scale 12104198 N" VICPNITY MAP
0
~ ~ ~
~
'
~ ~
fn~~na ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ ~ 1
~ ~ l , 1 ~ I ~
I . i
i ~
i
, ~
~ s~ ~ i ~ ' 1 ~ ~
~ a ~ ► ' ~ ~ ~ N
y ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ < ~ . ~
~ ► ~ 's'° ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t r
_ ~ ~ .
~ ' I ~ ~ ~ Id ~ . ~ ~ j . ~ - . ~ ~ .
z I I , ~ ~ d
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ ' ~ ~ ' I ~ t / ~ i r _ ~ ~ ~
~ r ~ i ~
+ ~ Eroa~W~y dv ~ay ~ ~ ~ ~ ac w~y ~~W~ , ' . r . ,
~ i ~ . ~
I - _ I . ! i ~ ~ p ~ d ~ .
~ ,
~ r~ ~ _ , .
~ , ~ ~
~ ~ a ~ ~ I ~ ~ .
~ { ~ m ; ~
- ~ ~ . ~ ; ~ ~ ~ o . ,
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ' V le' Iw V n~.'aY aY '~L.. 1~ aleyw
~yw _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' r-~ r--r-~ i - ~
~ _ Pro~ect _ ~ - ~ i ~
~ ~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' "
~ ~ , ~ ~ , ,
a ~ } - - - ~ - ts} ~ y ~ ,
' ~ R~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i
~I _ ~P~ ~
- ~I I 1 I 1 I I I I .
. . . .
9g N~ COMPREH~NSII~E PLAN MAP Not to Scale 041071
~ ,
. ~ ~E ~
• •
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
' ' ' ~ ~ ° ; " r 9o B•2~ ~ '
~ B-3 ~ ~ ~ . .
~ ~ r ~
7 ~ . - f so , ~ t ~ ,
. , ~ ~
~ ~ or, ~ . ~
~ ' ~ . . ,
; ~~0 i
~ ~ I sr ~ ~ 1
- ~ UR-22 ' ~ ~ ~ . ~
y ~ ~y w 1 ~ ~
~ ~ R-3.5 ~TI~-3.5 , s ~ ~ ~ O > Y I I ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I / ~_3~ ~ ~ i ~ . ;
~ d = ~ ' ~ = ~ a ~ ~ o, ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,1' ,~.,i ~ i
I il ' ~ ~ I
c~ a I' ~ i '~7 G1 ~ in ~ ~ ~
(A ~ ~ ~ ( . 7 , ~ ~ ~ ~R a
i q~ ° I ~ ~ ° / ~ I
, ~ ~ , B~. ~ ~Y ~ 3 ~ et~Oaqw~y ~~~y ~ _ i ~roadwa~y .
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ~ ~
\ ~3 _ ~ ' - ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ p i~ - ~ } ~ --~_1
\ I ~ r~ ' ~b . iJR-3.5 ~ UR-3.S , , ~ ~ ~y UR 3 ~5 ,
n I ~ f , ~ ; :
~ , ~ ~ ~ -B 3--. - ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ . . , ~ m ~
,5 d -3.~. I UR-7~ , ~ . . ' ~ ~ m t z' ~ ~ '
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~v~ ~v L _ , ~ ~
~ , . ~~N ~~„~1~ iay ` i 4.aleY~++r ~ . ; ~ ' i
_ ~ _ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~-2 3.Sa - . ~
I Y ~ ' rn ~ -Pro~ec~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'I ~ Vi~~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~~y ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~_3S , ~ , ~ . ~ ~ .
3 ~ ~i,~~~~~ ~ ~ .~r.~ . ~ ~ I ~pR M I n r . .
_ 7,~~a~ ~ ~ ~ f ; ~ ~ ~ - : ~ B-Z ~ ~ - ~ ~ r I ~ ~ ~rn~n111N ~ . ~
/ ~ f$i~ ~I # ~ ( . ~ ! . , B. , / `~1 I , , . ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ` ~ -r ' r ~ • r'r , s, UR-22 _ 9~ . \ ~n I~i jl ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ w ~ ~ ~ " ~ ' ` ~
~ ~ a~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 1 ~ ~ I ~
im~nj ~~Uaa.J.~~ < ' ~ a~u~.~ ~ w a. - - , . ~.a,o.~ l.wo~1'S '~,,.~T. 'l ..wr.., t!.',~..~.. ~14,~~±4,..~....~ , ti.~ - - - - - - - - - - - -
• . i
Not to Scale 04107199 N' ZONING MAP
~ ~
UR-J ~ ~ i • ~ B-2
~ ~~i ao ►~~i~'C - yp.~lc~.rwr•pre ^ ~
~,,,w ~ ~~v ' i0 Ir~~+N M..
~~w o..~~~.i,,q i... 9Qb E"W`9 ~ ~ a M MYI1pq ~
~ ( _ ~ ~u.+~.~ iw+i I~~.•1 ~ I~~ro ~ M~ ~u~
1. I 1 ~ • IN~. •111 I I ' H~ e~w ~ 1 .rr pV 4fw4wlwl ~N~
i.::_ - , uH-~ ~ _ . ~.,...,...r.~ ~ ~ IIINn~ ~ . t I a
~ " y~ ~I ~ ~ ° ° ' _ ~ 2 ~
Q ( • - , . UI ' - -
r ~ > l ~ a . - I~ t p . ~ _ . ~a~rr u~v
m j u' ~ s... ~i°'' rao "'yl ~ I { f 3 y n a
e-J ►~.o.~. ~ , i °"e' °"'°'Q ~ - ~r
, ~ ~1A wr.~.» w.. (win 10 ~1 I y • I
, „ ~ r RECEIVED ~ ~ ~ ~u~~~---------_ SPOKAN ~ ~
~ , E COUNTY ~ ~ ~ , z ; W
4 , D C 0 2 1998 S r ~ ~ , ~ ~ r w. ~w o~+~ ~w. ...~SI~... flE1~ELDPIf7'ri $tM1DARD o .
I~ a r AocGStp ta+t I u~ I « j i ° B-2 Ka[s I t I ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ► av~s~cN oF ei~~.oMC ~wo ~ur~iNa , cu~ i ~ , ~ w
o ao w a ~ ewiBwc us~ i r~p;~•~ ~t'.S~I ~Y, +..~ias~'~v .a~a I ~.w ..a ~ ! i : i. ~(y,nvt 1 re~ u i ~ ~..r z ' ~0/" i " atac~Hr oc oPnr s~'~tt I ~u I
~ ( U ~~c stiu~~►,S I rnoNr, af~a. 9ot ~ s io C~ 5 ~ ~ , ; 0 I , ~ imrm i
i Ji~~cwc i~'~E[9 ~ _i e~ i i w~6~ri76"S~ i swo ~ i w ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ i'SO u i y ~ 71 ~ 4 , r~ ~ ~ J
~ 5~3 ~ - ~ I f . i ~w I~ww) UA•7 I
I I 1 itiw ~ [.w~y
~ I ~ I ~ ~ M11 NNM ~~ti1 • w _11 ~ 1 1
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ; r¢ P.ROPh'~?'Y .DBSCRIP ION I LrMM hqw~J IMA 1 • Y ~'•1 Of10~ I ~ I 8 .0.
~ N t^~ fp+t 5! ~erl of tn1 Wefl 1/1 of Trpct S9 of Yaro, oCtOronQ to P1ot rKproad n Vplum~ '0' ot~ 10 ~~4 I u~a.~w ~ ~ ~ 6•''" , ?ie;~, Pop~ 10 in Spckan¢ Counly. Maah~~Qlon,toqat~ar ritn In~ 41e~1 78 I~~I of Ene :a~t I/1 0~ ~ Y . 1 ~r Y~.M O~nwny I... ~ 1J I f~M Nw A.1+~M/ ~~CC! SE 0~ VE/0~ t 0~
S..« r w. i.n' 1 a Uti I. ~ ~79A' /r~ ~ 1wu~ M~ a ~ ~„M,r r~eo loqetner •~tn ~n. ~a~o.~nq ueu~baq Porcei ~ ;
'ne :oei SJ ro~t oi tn~ we~t ~3~ ~eel ot Eo~r t/) oi troct Sb oi ~~oro . ~ p~ •_---'~•'-~"'~"'ii~.~.. L~~+1~ ~..~i.'S..:L'„'~'-"_`r- ixCEa' t~~ No~tn !~S iaee ana
~ ~ VAI~YdF~kY ~:SO ExCEPT tna So~~n id0 :ocs
SI~E PIAN OFRECORD lAN ,
. . ~
~ ar~. aaNmRS ~t uwn su~
K 909 ARGD~OE ROAD, SF'O~KIJ~E VA, 9921~-Z7B9 P►~OK c309) 426-t~22 ~AX f`.09> 9s6-17t~ ~
v ~ ~'E.~ S~ 1 4 OF S~C.16 T26N R44 ~11.M ~ s r~~ 4 oF , , .
SPOKANE C4U.N7'Y, fiASAINCTDN
, , r ~
' • ( t
ATTACHMENT 6
AGENCY COM~IENTS
l ;
~ . ~ o ~ . 1 I
. . ~ ~ . . , . .
UFFZCE OF THE S~'OK.A.~~E C~~JN~'Y E~G .N~EER
10?6 Broadtivay Ave, Spokane, ~►VA 99?60-0170 (509}456-3b00 ~'ax 324-~3~7~
"ENG~~EER'S C~~DXI~XO~S ~PROVAL" TR-ZQNES . . ~
~r0: Spokane ~oun Buildin~ and Planrlln Dep rcrilent ~ ~ ~ ~
F~~J1~I: Division ot^En~ineerin~ ~ Roads ~
DATE: A. ~ ' ~ J ~ pnl b,1999
P~~J~E~T: U~-7 TO U~t-22 N~ED~CA.~. PRU►~ESSIO~~~~.., 4.F~,IC~S
~~L~ n~ -ZE-0020-98/)
HearinJ D~ten 0411~/99 at 9:00
Revietiv Date
SponsorlAppticant o STACY B~ORIJAHL
Section To~vnship Ran~e: 14-2~-4~
Planner: STACY BJ~R.DA~~(~
TechnicaUReview Date: (1 ?Il 1f 1995 @ ~
The Spokane County En~ineering Departmen~ has r~~ietiv~;c~ the a~ove r~ferenced a~p~ication. Th~ follndJ~rirl~
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spo~~~ Co~~r~~y :~laru~inQ I~epa~tme~nt ~o~~ inclusion in the
"Findin~s of Fact, Conclusions and C)rder/~ecision"' shou~d the re~u~st be approved.
. 1 . ~~~~~t., ~,ti~ a~ , - _ _ " ~ . ~ ~ ~ t"~' ~i~` 8~ 4~' - , ~I f~~
~~~licant s'nGl~. gr~nt appl.ic~~~~e bar~c~~r easei~nents adj ~c~nL to S~~k~~n~:
County Righ~ oz W~y per Spokazle Caunt~ St.ar~d~zds .
2. Access perm? ts for~ Gnpzo~c:h~~ ~o ~P~ ~ol~nty kQGd Sys~~m ~~l-~~. ► b~
obtained f rom the Coun~.y Enginee~ N '
3 o P.pplic~nt shall s~:bm~ t~or a.opro~a~ by~ th~ Spok~ne Coun~.y E~g~~ r
, drain~qe ~nd Gcc~ss ~l~ns•
~ parking plan and ~ra~f.ic C1rCL~~~~i ~IZ pl~n s~~~ll ~e submittEd arz~ ,
a~proved by tne Spak~~~e Cc~unty ~~g~ n.~ez . '~h.e des~.gn, loc~~ion ~ nc~ .
Grrangemen~ oi par~i.n~ stG11s sh~:11 ~.n ~ccor.c~ar~cz with stcnd~.r~
engineering pr~ctices. P~vinc~ or s~.~r~~rinc~ Gs ~.~~1-c~vec~ by t~7E Co~nt~ .
Engine~r c~~~ 11 be req~~j red for Gny ~~ort,~ ~n of ~he j~r0]~Ct urnich ~_s ~.o k~e
occupied or ~raveled ~y veh~ ~les •
.
`~h L c o n s i. r~..~~.-~.~~e~ ~°=r~o 2~~~ c~:~ l c~ ~t~ c m~ a~ ~ s s- - s t~ t~~ d~ e z~ e~ -~~r~ ~ T--~
~ c ~a ~ ~ - ' ~ L ~'f•~.'~ C~ G~~~~.~V~~~ U1 ~.tl~.
CC: ~`-.~:licant ~:~:Gzi ~tLe:~ ( :::~'~I~ll E~'~z'~°°r/S~='ve.~e~ 5~:.,?SOIt
Pl~nro_ ~ C"']C'J QJ'l)".Jr_'~!,
- o
~ ~ ~ 4 ~
• Page 2 12f17/1998
0020
6. - T~ C-o~-u--~-t-~~ ~-'rr-re-e~. ha3 d-~-s--~~~-~ -~--Co 11 e~~ o~r ~ua~~~~ ~e-~~i o~ ~ o r~ h e
, ~rp r oro~-~me~n-t. o ~ d~~i-~e-p ~--a~ 1 ~ ~a-d~-~e-n-~ ~-o ~ p~-o s ~ a
, . T 7 Q 1=o~~e-~ ~i=~ =1. x~e ~ u.z r~e~n e a c~'d i t i o n o`f ~ a~~~x-~ r~~ e_l.~y~8 ~-~-0- ~5
f e eAt o f ~~-~=~-a 1-~ --~1 o.~~t~e~--~f ryo~ ~q ~~t -d.~ ve.~o=p~n~~=: C;u°~-i-n-~° ~~..,d
~~~s~:~ e w a i~c m u s~~ a~~--b~o~~
7 ~ _ ~~-~-1 ~.r.~e ~ ~r o ~~~.e~.~.s ~h ~ > > _ ~~c on.f ar~~ ~it h e' ~-~c ~rr r e~=t- S~~ ~ ~ -~~c~~-
~
- Washi~~gt-~ S~d~nd~d ~p~~-i~~~c-a-~l.on_s. _for-~~aad-=arid~=Bri-dge construction z-~rd
o~re i~;~~.a~e--c~o-u~-t y s t~n d a r a s~. ~ n d/ o~ - a~ d~o~ e s~a].-u t i o r~s- p E r ~ G i n~ n~ ~
~ ~~~I Sz ~~rc3~r-d s~~-~~~~-t t~~'geme n ~ 1 n e z t e c t a t t h e~G .
~e-~~-~-r~a u n;--~-~ o ~ ~ L ~ ~h e~ o un t y E ng n y:~:
8. ~oadwa~ st~ndards, ~ypical ro~dway sect~ons and dreinGge p1Gn
rEquir~r~en~s are four~d in SpokGne Bo~rd oi County Commission~rs
resolu~ion 95-0~98 as ~.mended and ~re applicable to this pronosal.
9. No construction ~ork is to be p~rformed within tne exis~ing or pro~osed
right of tiJay until ~ perm~t has been issued by the County Engineer. F~1~
work within the public road riqht oi way is s~zbject to inspact~ on ~nd
a.pproval by the County Enaineer.
10. All .re~.~i~red c~onstr~c~ion w~=t~hin t'~1~__ ~xist=i~nc~~-or .pro~osed pu~'~lic rig~t - .
~~~~~~~.~~-~i^ t-c~ ~e a s e a f a bu i 1 d~ na pe ~ t 9.~ ~ .
a bo nd i n~ra--~a-rx~. ~ s~'im~ ~ ed ~y ~-~-E ~o=~-~-~-~_ _~~g ~e~~. o cove r~~~i~ cc~-~-~
- - ~ ~ n s o~ ~~m.~~.o',~e.m~...~. ~ _ _ ~~a l~~- ~e l~ec~ w"i ~i s-_ _ ~
~4 - ~~c~i~.~.e.~..
11. The County P+rterial ~o~d plan ident~ fies VG1~ ey w~y ~s G 70 ~oo~
Collector A~terial . The existing right of wa~ width of ~0 zee~ s no~
consistent with that saeci~i~d in the Pl~n. In or.der to i~~~ e~en~ ~h~
~ Ar~erial Ro~d P1Gn it is recommend~d ~~at in ~ddition to the requirea
right of w~y dedic~tion, a strip of pr~perty 12.5 in wid~h along ~he
V~lley Way frontage be set ~side i~ reserve. Th.is pro.~er_fiy mGy be
zcquired by Spokane Caun~y at the time when Ar~erial Improv~ments ~r2
made to Val~ e~ ~1ay.
12 . The applicant ~ s'noula be Gdvised tr.~t thEre may exist util~ t~ ~s E~ ~her
under ro~nd or averne~d affectina the ~pplican~s prope~~~t, inc~ udin~ g
pro~erty to b~ dedicated or set ~side z~ture ~cquis; t; en. Spok~ne , ~
County will ~ssume no flnanci~l ob~lgation for ad~us~mcnts oY
r21 OCdt14n reg~rding tnese utilitiES. The appl~ cant sho~~ d c~ec~ jr~; ~h
~he appl~ c~~l e ui.111~1~S and Spo.'.an~ County Engineer ~o deter:~ ~ n; ,
wh~tner ~he ~~~lic~n~ or uti~ ity is respons~ble f~r Gajus~.m~rz~ or
r~locat~ on casLs Gnd to m~'~ce ~~~~~gemen~s io~ ~nv necess~rv ti,~or-k.
~e
i ~ ~ ~ • i ~ .
Page 3 .
I2/1i/199$
002Q
1~. Per the NIDNS the applic~nt h~s made a voluntary contribution of
$4100.00 to th2 Sullivan Ro~d/I-~0 Interchanqe for improvements to tne
loop ramp. At this timE tne estim~tEd construction dat~ is 2001.
, 1 j ,
To: STACY BJORDA~L (~uiiding & Planning~
CC:
From: J1M RED (Utilities)
~
Date: 41'~199
Subject: ZE-0020-98 Stage: Heal~ing Exacniner Phase:
412 N Century
SS09 A wet ~live~ sewer connection to the area-uvide Public Sewer Sys~~m is to be constructed. Sewer connection permi~ is required. Commercia~ dev~lopments shall submit historical and or estimated
water usage prior to the issuance of the conn~ctivn permit in order to est~biish sewer fees.
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to S~aka~~e Count~ Division of Utii6ties "unc~er separate cover", oniy those pian sheets showing sewer plans af~~ speci~ications for t~e public sewer cann~ctions
and facilities for review and approvai. Comm~r~iai deveiopments shalf submit historical and or
estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submit~al.
SS12F Sewer plans accep#able to th~ Di~isi~n Utili#ies shall be submit~ed pr~~r to ~he issuance of the sewer construction permit.
WS41 Any water service for this pro~ect ~hall bQ oro~ided i~ accordance wlth the Coordinated Water ~ System Plan for Spokane ~Coun~y, as am~n~ed. ~
~ , J
~ ~ SPOKANE KEGIONAL HEALTH DISTRIc;T { t
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
~ Inter-office Communication
I~ATE: March 24,1999
J
T0: Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Planner, Spokane County Bui~ding and Planning I~ivlsion
t ~
~ : ~~c~. ' FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD L. ` ,
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Chan~e: ZE-20-98 (Redlin}
l. References:
a} Map of subject, scale 1" = 40', by applicant, undated, rece~ved by this office December 4,1998.
b) Reconnaissance GeoloQic Map of the ~Vest Half of the Spokane Quadran~le. 'VVashin~on and Idaho,
Allan B. Gri~~s,1966.
c) Soil Survev, Sookane Countv. ~ash~n~ton, Soil Conservatio.n Service, U.S.~.~.,1V1~rch,196~. ~
d) Spokane Countv, Washin~ton. EnQineerin~ Inter~retations, 5oil C~nservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August,1974.
e) Spokane Countv Rules and Re~ulatior~s for 5ewaae Disposal Svstems, J~n~lary 19,1995.
~ Lobs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sectio~s 1~,13,14, ~ 5, and ?,3.
g) Map: Greenacres ~uadrangle, U.S.G.S.,1973, and Spokane N.F., TJ.S.G.S.,19°13.
2. Findings: .
a} This project ~ies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aq~ifer.
b) The project is within Critical ~Vater Supply Service Area #3 ~nd w~th~~l ~he service ~rea af ~1exa 'V~a~er
and Potiver. ~later supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensi~e tiVaste~ater i1~la.na~~ment Area, insi~e the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer 5ervice Area recommended in the '20I'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is ~ubject to approval of the Direc~or of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24,198~. The topo~raphy and soils in
the area are ~enerally suitable for use of individual on-site sewa~e disposa~ systems. "rhe lot is of the
proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well an.d se~a~e syst~m..
d) `~he project lies in a relatively flat area west of Sullivan Road and nort~ of ~alleytivay. Local
draina~eways are insignificant.
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as ~a~~ison ~avelly loam ~vith 0% to
5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitatio~ of sl~ght. There is also possible
f~ /
v ~
contamination of groundwater. = This 5~ il would be classif ed as a Type IV.
f} Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geologicai structures generally yield moderate
to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are
from 81' to 240' deep and have static ~ater levels varying from 50' to 158' below the surface. The Vera
Water and Power has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion
of agreements with the proponent.
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a~ Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
b) ~Vater service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane Countv.
c) ~Vater service shail be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Rebional En~ineer
(Spokane}, State Department of Health.
d) A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided.
Use of an individual on-site sewage disposal s~stem shall not be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is pro~ibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: Dwight J. Hume
107 S. Howard, Ste. 325 .
Spokane WA 9~201
, Paul S. Redlin ~
PO Box 244
Veradale WA 99037
I an~us e.) trize-20-98
- SPOI~~E ~AI.~Y FY~ nFPT BUiLDING CODES ~j 002 12/10/98 THU 15:21 F~ 509 89r 12~
t ~ y ~
SPOKAN~ VALL~Y FIR~ D~PAR~ E ~ M NT
' Spokane County F1re ~~strlct l
10314 EASt SP(?AGl1E AVE. ~ SPOKAN~,INA 992tJ~-367~ • C50~ 928•170~ • FAX (~04) 892-41Z5
~ Q Pvt Humphties
~ t~isf
Dece~aber 10 , 19 9 8
Stacy B~o~dahl ,
Department of euilding and Planning
1026 W, 8roadway
Spoka~e, WA 99264
RE: Zone Reclassifi~ation
z~--2 o-g 8
Dear M6, Bjordahl:
T~e Spokane ~a3.ley ~ire Depaz'tment has no obj ectian ~o ~his zo~e
reclassification, . ~
Sinc ~ly,
Kevi Miller .
Fue Insp~ctor ,
K~i/sa
. ~ ~ .
M r
s •
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI
~ ~ ~ r • a
~
RECOMNfENDED CO~ND~TIONS OF
APPR~VAL F4RZE-20-98 ~ ~ ~
,
~
DIVISION OF BUILOINGAI~O PLANNING
SPO~~ . ~ ~
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shali include the applicant, owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and
successors.
2. The zone change appiies to the following real property: The East 53 feet Qf the West ~/z
of Tract 56 of Vera, according ~o Plat recorded in Volume "0" of Piats, page 30 in
Spokane County, INashington. ~ogether with the VUest 78 fee~ of t~e East'/ of Tract 56
of Vera; Also Together With the following described parcel: The East 53 feet of the UVest
131 feet of the East'/z of Tract 56 of Vera; Except the North 315 feet and also except the
South 180 feet.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone and al~ other
applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as a~nended.
4. The applicant shatl develop the subject property in accordance with the site plan of record
~Division of ~uild~ing and Planning date stamp December 2, .1998) presented to the
Hearing Examiner on April 14,1999. Minor variations, to be approved by the Director of
the Division of Building and Planni~gldesignee, shall only be allowed to meet regulation
standards and conditions of approval, All variations must conform to regulations set forth
in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans
shall be maintained.
5. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee of
a specif~c (ighting and signing plan for the described proper~y prior to the release of any
building permit.
6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary. .
7. If the property is developed with aIF office uses, a lot line adjustment to aggregate the two
parceis shall be completed prior to fhe issuance of a building permit. lf the property is
developed into both office and residential uses (apartments}, the applicant shail modify the
property boundaries in such a manner to ensure the o~ices ~public and semi-public use)
and the apartmen#s (residential use} are on separate parcels.
8. The Division of Building and P{anning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject #o a variet~l of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall
~ro
serve as public notice of the~ conditi~ns of approval affecting the property in question. The
Title Not~ce should be recorded wi~hin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and
shall only be released, in full o~ in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as foliows:
The parcel of property legaily described as [ insert legal desc~iptionj is the subject of a
land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on Aprii 14,1999, imposing a variety
of speciai development conditions. Fi~e No. ZE-20-98 is available for inspection and copying
in the Spokane County Division of Bui~ding and Planning.
9. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the
Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice specifying road right-of way and utilities. The
reserved future acquisition area Ti~le Notice shall be released, in fuil or in part, by the
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shouid be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall general(y provide the following:
a. A strip of property 12.5 feet in width shall be set aside as reserved future acquisition
area for road right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing andlor newly
dedicated right-of-way along Valfeyway.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or aliowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of way and utilities. lf any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, unti! acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements ~such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shai{ be considered interim uses.
e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at
the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future
acquisition area.
r~
~ ~
I~ • •
D
r / ri~j, 1 t
t t
r ~
~ •
r ~
~
f / ? ~ ✓
O.~ ~
~
+
r
~ l Y
d'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ■
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR-ZONES
T0: Spo ~ane County Bul ding an P D ment -
FROM: Divis~on of Engineering ~i Roads
DATE: April 6,1999 ~
PROJECT: UR-7 TO UR-22 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
FILE -ZE-0020-98/)
Hearing Date: 04/14199 at 9:00
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant: STACY BJORDAHL
Section Township Range: 14-25-44
Planner: STACY BJORDAHL
TechnicaUReview Date: (12/17/1998 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The follovving
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
"Findings of Fact, Conclusions and OrderlDecision" should the request be approved.
l. Applicant shall dedicate 2.5 feet on Valley Way for right of way. The
applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane
County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
road, drainage and access plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
a
i
CC: Applicant DWIGHT HUME {REDLIN)
Engineer/Surveyor SIMPSON Planner STACY BJORDAHL
Page' 2 ~ ~ 12/17/1998
r ~~2~
6. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Roadway Section for the
improvement of Valley Way which is adjacent to the proposed
development. This will require the addition of approxirnately 8.5-10.5
feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
7. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
8. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
10. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right
of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or
a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
11. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70 foot
Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 40 feet is not
consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the
Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required
right of way dedication, a strip of property 12.5 in width along the
Valley Way frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be
acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are
made to Valley Way.
12. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
Pag~ 3 • t 12/17/1998
0020
13. Per the MDNS the applicant has made a voluntary contribution of
$4100.00 to the Sullivan Road/I-90 Interchange for improvements to the
loop ramp. At this time the estimated construction date is 2001.
~ , ~ ~ I _ i ~ '
I
j'', ~
~i + ~
S P O K A N E . ~~_o~ . C O U N T Y
BUILDING AND PI~ANMNG . A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
James L. Manson, C.B.O., Director Gary Oberg, Director
~
RANDUM ~ MEMO IV ~ ~
rl,cjl~ ~ ~ ~9~9
, T0: - ' ' ' _ • `1
Developmen ngineerin~ Services; Bill Hemmings ~KANE~Q~N~,E
S okane Coun Division of Utilities; Jim Red ~G~NEE~ P ~Y Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
~ Spokane Regional Health District; Steve ~lolderby
Spokane Count~ Air Pollution Control Authority
Spokane County Division of Long Range Pianning, John Mercer
Spokane County Division of Parks, Rec & Fair; Steve Horobiowski Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Miles
Fire District No. 1
. Central Valley School District No. 35b
Vera Water & Power Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
FROM: Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Planne
DATE: March 17,1999
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of April 14,1999 at 9:00 a.m.
FILE # ZE-20-98 Description: Zone reclassification from UR-7 to UR-22 for medical and professional
offices
STR 14-25-44
Sponsor: Paul Redlin Agent: Dwibht Hume
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by April 1,1999.
SB: kac
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0050 nu~~Tr. ~~na~ . ~~Y. ~~na~ n~~_e~n~ . Tnn~ /~f1~1 2~A 'l~LL '
1►1VtV1:. 1.lV7~ 'S/ 1 .1U/,! 1 M. ~✓V!~ zi I zi V%! 1 LL. 1✓l/Jj .1LY~JIUV
,I~ i` • I
I ~ ,
~ 1 ' •
NOTICE ~F PUBLIC HEA.RING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EX:AMINER
T0: All interested ersons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet w P
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING V~ILL BE HELD ON THE LAND
USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLO'WS:
Application: File No. ZE-?0-98; The property owner has submitted an application to rezone appro~imately two
(2) acres from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7} to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for the purpose of developing
medical and professional offices. The site plan of record also indicates that a 14-unit apartment building may be
constructed in lieti of one of the office buildings.
Hearing Date and Time: April 14, 1999 @ 9:00 a.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level; Spokane County Public 1~orks Building, 1026 West
_ Broadway, Spokane, ~ashington.
Owner: Paul S. Redlin, P.O. Box 24~, Veradale, WA 99037
Owner's Designated Contact: Dwight J. Hume, 107 S. Howard, Suite 325, Spokane, WA 99201, (~09) 456-7402
Address and Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Walleytivay, approximately 220 feet ~vest of
Sullivan Road, within the southeast quarter of Section I~, Township 25 N., Ran~e 44 EW1~1, Spokane County, Washin~on. The street address of the proposal is 4~ 2 N. Century Lane.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban and Commercial.
Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7).
Environmental Determination: A Miti~ated Determination of Nonsi~nificance (MDNS) was issued by the
County Division of Buildin~ and PlanninQ, as the lead a~ency on Niarch 26,1999. The comment period ends
April 12,1999.
Related Permits: None.
Division of Building & Planning Staff: Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Planner, (509) 477-3675
HEA.RI'~i 1G EXAM~NER PROCEDURES
I~earing Process and A~peals: The hearing wi11 be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane
County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testif~ at the public hearin~, and may submit `vritten
comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearinj EYaminer may (imit the time Qiven to speakers.
A speaker representing each side of the issue is encoura~ed. Any appeal of the Hearin~ Examiner's decision will
be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171.
Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underiyin~ action. All hearings tivill be conducted in facilities which are accessible to persons with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report ~vill generally be available for inspection seven days
before the hearin~. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of
Building and Plannin~, lst Floor Permit Center West, Public ti~lorks Buildin~, 1026 West Broadtivay, Spokane,
WA, 99260, beriveen 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents ~vil1 be rnade
available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509}
477-3675. Send tivritten comments to the Spokane County Division of Building and PlanninQ,102b ~V,
Broadtivay, Spokane, tiVA, 99260, Attn: Stacy Bjordahl, ZE-20-98. Motions must be made in ~~~ritinQ and
submitted to the Spokane County Hearin~ Examiner, 3rd Floor, Public ~Vorks Buildin~; 10?6 ~V. Broad~vay,
Spokane, WA, 99?60-024~. ~
SPOKANE ENVIRONMEIV~'AL ~~tD1NA~~vC~,
(WAC 197-11-970) Section I 1.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
FYLE NQ(S}: ZE-20-98
DESCRiPTION OF PROP~SAL: The property owner has submitted an application to rezone approximately two (2) acres from Urban Res~dential-7 (UR-7) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for the purpose of developing
medical and professional offices. The site plan of record also indicates that a 14-unit apartment building may
be constructed in lieu of one of the office buildings.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: April 14,1999
OWNER: Paul S. Redlin, I',0. Box 244, Veradale, WA 99037 OWNER'S DESIGNAT~D CONTACT; Dwight J. Hume, l07 S. Howard, Suite 325, Spokane, WA 99201,
(509) 456-7402 .
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located north of dnd adjacent to Valleyway, approximately 220 feet west of Sullivan Road, within the southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 25 N,, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington. The street address of the proposal is 4l2 Iv'. Century Lane.
LEAD AGENCY: SP4KANE COUNTY
The lead a~ency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on
tlle environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43,2IC.030(2}(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist
and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
O There is no comment period for this MDNS; pursuant to WAC l 97-1 ]-340 { 1). ~
(X) This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below}. Comments regarding this MDNS must be
submitted no later than 4:00 p,m., April 12,1999, if they are intended to alter the MDNS,
MiTIGATING MEASURES:
l. Previous environmental information has demonstrated that additional improvements are required to
mitigate traffic impacts at the Sul(ivan Road/lnterstate 90 Interchange. The applicant has voluntarily agreed to contribute the sum of $4100.00 to mitigate the traffic impacts of his proposal on the Sullivan
Roadl[nterstate 901nterchange.
I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications and adjushnents to the above described proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the future.
Date: ' I~- ~ 9~Pri ted/Typed Name: ` ~ c G,.a"~- ~~~~wt. ~e,~~ J
~ r' "w. Si~nature: . ~
~~~~~~k~~*~~~~~~~~~***' ~~k~**~*~*~~~~~k~~~~*~~~~~~*~*~~k~*~k~~*~
Responsible Official: JIM MANSON by Stacy Bjordahl
Position/Title: Senior Pianner Phone: (509) 477-3675
Address: West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260
Comments regarding environmental concems a elcome at the heari g. ~
Date lssued: ~ Si natur ~ ~ g
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County
Division of Building & Planning, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same
as the above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building & Planning for
assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal,
A copy of the MDNS was mailed to:
1. 1~IA. State Department of Ecology 2. Spakane Regional Health District
Sepa Review, Olympia, 98504 Attn: Steve Holderby
3. Spokane County Division of Utilities. 4. Spokane County Division of Building &
Attn: Jim Red Planning ~ Attn: .1eff F~rrv
~
5. - MMMMMMFIglqleering 6. Spokane County Fire Protection
• . District #1
7. Spokane County Air Po(lution Control 8. Spokacie County Parks, Recreation & Fair
Authority . Attn: Steve Horabiowski
9. Spokane County Stormwater Utility 10, WA State Boundary Review Board
Attn: Brenda Sims Attn: Scisan Winchell
11. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 12. Spokane Transit Authority
Attn: Glenn Miles Attn: Chris+ine Fueston
13, WA State Departnient of Transportation 14, Central Valle}► School District No. 356
Attn: Mark Rawher
15. Wera Water & Aower 16. Long Range Planning Division Attn; Jolin Mercer
MsrR; MnNs
Ri,v: i2i9u
~ R
~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~
, 1 • . ~ • ' ' ~ ' ~
~ 1 / 1 • ' ~
To: Stacy Bjordahl ~
From: Scott Engelhard ~ ~
Date: 03-17-99
Re: ZE-20-98
Previous environmental information has demonstrated that additienal improvements are reyuired to
mitigate traffic impacts at the Sullivan Roadlinterstate 90 Interchange. The applicant has voluntarily
agreed ta contribute the sum of $4100.00 to mitigate the tra~ic impacts of his proposal on the Sullivan
Roadllnterstate 90 Interchange.
c ~
1 ~ , ' 1 ~ 1 ~
. 1 ~ . ~ • ' ' ~ - ~
~ 1 1 1 ~ ' - ~
To: Stacy Bjordahl ~ ~
From: Scott Engeihard '
~ ~ Date: 03-17-99
Re: ZE-20-98
Previous envir~nmentai information has demonstrated that additional improvemen#s are required #o
mitigate traffic impacts at the Sullivan Road/lnterstate 90 Interchange. The applicant has voluntarily
~ agreed to contribute the sum of $4100.00 to mitigate the trafFc impacts of his proposal on the Sullivan Roadllnterstate 90 Interchange.
f
, ~ v ~
, • ~
F ~ ~I ~ ~'1 . SPp~~ ~C~
~rY ~r~Gi~~~o
M ~ . , .
. . ~ ,
, .
1 ~ ~ - N~TICE C~~AP~LICATIQN
, . ~
. ~ - ~ ~
~IVISiON OF ~UILDIN~GAND PLA~NNIIVG
SPO~~r~ . . .
~I~his ~votice ot ~p~iica~inn i~ i~~a~'~~ N~ ~~fec#~~ ~~~~c~e~ ~n~ o~~~~s.lt~x~~g~ers
of property located within 400 feet of a proposed land use application received by the
Spokane County Division of Building and Pianning. This notice is to adv~se you that the
lan~i use application may af~ect you and to invite your comments on the p~nject. Written
comments may be submitted by any person regarding this project and the
environmenta! review (SEPA} process. A!I comments received by Februa~y 15,1999
wiil be considered by the project planner prior to preparation of a staff report and
recommendation of a decision #o the Hearing Examiner. Comment~ wili continue to be ,
weicomed up through~the public hearing. The projec# file may,be ~xam~nec~ betv~e~n 8
a.m. and 4 p.m. I~onday through Friday, except;~olidays; ~in~the~Builaing and Plan~ing
Division of the Public Works Building,1 ~ Floar ~ermit ~Ce~n~er;,1026 Wes~ Broa~v~ay,
S okane Ul~ashin ton. If ou have questions, you r~ay" cal~ the prQject pl~nner at the P , 9 Y phone number identified at the end of this notice. P{ease refi~r~nce #~e P~sOz~~~T FIL~
~IUMBER(S) in alf your communications. , ,
, ~ „
; , ~ ~ PROJECT FILE NUMBER:, ~
PROPERTY OWNER: Paul S. Redlin
PO Box 244
Veradale, WA 99037
CONTACT PERSAN: Dwight J. Hta~~ ~
~ 107 S. Howard, Suit~ 325
~ Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 456-7402
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~'he property owner has s~ab~nitt~d an appl~c~#~~~i to rezone
approximately 2 acres from Urban Residentia!-7 (U~~1~ to Urban R~sidential-~2 (UR-22)
for the purpose of devefoping medical and profes~aonal offc~~. Th~ site ~i~n of ~ecord also indicates that ~ 14-unit apar~ment build~ng r~a~~ be con~t~ uc~~d 'on {ieu af on~ of the
office buildings.
IOCATION: The subject property is iocated n~rth of an~ ~c~~acent to ~~I~e~~ray,
approximateiy 220 feet west of Sullivan Road, within the so~~he~st g~ar~er of Section
14, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane C~un~yf li~~s~ington. The ~freei
address of the proposal is 412 N. Century Lane.
Type II1 Ntc of Applrev 10-8-97 ~age 1 Of 2
t
DATE APPLICATION SU6MITTED: 12/2198
DATE APPLlCATION ACCEPTED ~DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS}: 2/1/99
. .a . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Urban and Commercial
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7)
ADDITIONAL PERMITS: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional
permits may be required including building permits, approach permits and any other
permits identified through the public hearing process,
ADDITIQNAL S'~UDlE~ R~QI!E,S'~.~D: Na ~dditi~~a! ~t~:~i~s ~d'J2 ~Jet,il f~equesied a~ ihis ~i ~ E' . 4 ~ ` ~ , r
fime.~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Review of existing development regulations, the ~
proposed use, typical recommended conditions of approval and proposed mitigating
measures, the State Environmental Policy Act ~SEPA~ threshold determination will likely
be a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance ~MDNS},
DEVELOPMENT REGUlATIONS: The proposed project shall comply with any applicable
regulations and devefopment standards identified in the Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance,
Uniform Building Code, Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction,
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the regulations of the
Spokane Regional Health District.
ACTION:~ This project is subject to a future public hearing. You wili be receiving a
Notice of Hearing which will be issued a minimum of fifteen (15~ days prior to the public
hearing. A written report, including a staff analysis of the project and recommendation
of decision, will be available for inspection seven (7) calendar days prior to the public
hearing. Par~icipation in the public hearing is encouraged. A copy of the Notice of
Decision issued by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner which identi~ies the findings
of fact, conclusion, decision andrappeal rights will be provided to those individuals who
testify at the public hearing and wi~ll be~available to all o#hers upon request.'~~~~~
ATTACHMENTS: Attached is a vicinity map and site development plan for your review.
REVIEW AUTHORITY: Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Planner
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
1026 West Broadway Avenue
~ Spokane, Washington 99264
Phone: (509) 477-3675 Fax: ~509) 456-2243
Date Issued and Mailed: February.1,1999 ,
~ , . , ~ .
Si nature: ~ ( G , g
f~ `
Type III Ntc of Applrev 10-8-97 Page 2 Of 2
~ 1
~ f ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~
. 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~
~ 1 1 1 ~ 1
To: Spokane County Building and Planning
Planner: STACY BJORDAHL
. . From: Scott Engelhard, Transportation Engineering SP & DES Coordinator
Subject: ZE-0020-98 UR-7 TO UR-22 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
Technical Review Date: 1211711998@ 2:15
Applicant: DWIGHT HUME (REDLIN)
Date: January 11,1999
RE: Technical Review
The applicant has agreed to provide voluntary mitigation to the I-90lSullivan Road Interchange
based on the traffic generated form this proposal, I spoke with his agent, Dwight Hume, and he
understands that an MDNS is required. ~
This proposal is technically complete.
1
~ f
Kimball, Sandy
~
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, December 08,19981:16 PM To: Bjordahl, Stacy
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Pederson, John; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine;
Sims, Brenda
Subject: ZE-20-98 - Paul Redlin
12-08-98
I received the above referenced application on December 7,1998.
This project lies in an area of approved soils so a concept drainage plan is not required.
I have no knowledge of any critical areas on this site.
I consider this application to be teGhnically complete.
~G~ ~l ~ ,
Page 1
,
PAGE 1 08:26:20 07 DEC 1998 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05110 VALLEYWAY AV ~START) .000 FANCHER RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24
VALLEYWAY AV .160 LAKE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24
.240 EASTERN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24
VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 DYER RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 24
05111 VALLEYWAY AV (START) .000 PARK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 22 VALLEYWAY AV ~ .230 ELLA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.360 DICK RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.480 VISTA RD U 17 PAVED 20
.530 MESA LN (PVT RD} U 17 PAVED 20
.610 BESSIE RD U 17 PAVED 20
.740 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 20
.860 MARGUERITE RD U 17 PAVED 18 .920 HUTCHINS~N RD ~END~ U 17 PAVED 18
.990 ARGONNE RD U 17 PAVED 40
1.050 MULLAN RD U 17 PAVED 20
1.120 WILLOW RD U 17 PAVED 20
1.240 LOCUST RD U 17 PAVED 20
1.380 FARR RD U 19 PAVED 14
VALLEYWAY AV ~END) 1.500 EAST END OF ROAD
05112 VALLEYWAY AV (START~ .000 WALNUT RD U 19 PAVED 20 VALLEYWAY AV .060 HERALD RD U 17 PAVED 20
.190 FELTS RD U 17 PAVED 20
.310 R.AYMOND RD U 17 PAVED 20
.440 UNIVERSITY RD U 17 PAVED 20
.510 VAN MARTER RD (END7 U 17 PAVED 20
.690 PIERCE RD ~END) U 17 PAVED 20 .790 SKIPWORTH RD (START~ U 17 PAVED 20
.940 BOWDISH RD U 17 PAVED 20
1.010 BATES RD (START} U 17 PAVED 30
1.190 UNION RD (END} U 17 PAVED 20
1.450 SR 27 (PINES7 U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.840 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.950 MCDONALD RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 2.110 MCCABE RD ~END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.200 BLAKE RD (END} U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.310 MAYHEW ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.360 MAMER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
VALLEYWAY AV (END7 2.470 EVERGREEN RD
05113 VALLEYWAY AV (START} .000 EVERGREEN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
VALLEYWAY AV .110 BOLIVAR RD (END} U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .160 BANNEN RD (START} U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.170 BANNEN RD (END~ U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.250 BEST RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.260 BEST RD ~END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.300 REES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
VALLEYWAY AV (END) .500 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05114 VALLEYWAY AV (START} .000 ADAMS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 VALLEYWAY AV .120 BURNS RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.150 BURNS RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.250 PROGRESS RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.390 SOMMER RD (START} U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.500 SULLIVAN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.770 MOORE RD (START} U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.000 CONKLIN RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 1.160 SHAMROCK ~NONESTABLI U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
VALLEYWAY AV (END} 1.500 FLORA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05115 VALLEYWAY AV (START} .000 HARMONY RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
VALLEYWAY AV .110 MCM I LLAN ~~D ( F`ND ) U 19 PAVED 4 0 .130 MCMILLAN CT (START7 U 19 PAVED 40
PAGE 2 . . 08:26:22 07 DEC 1998 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
VALLEYWAY AV (END) .320 HODGES RD U 19 PAVED 40
05116 VALLEYWAY AV (LIBERT .000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 PAVED 40
VALLEYWAY AV .020 MCKINZIE DR (END} R 09 PAVED 40
.080 GARRY DR (END} R 09 PAVED 40
.190 MAIN AV (LIBERTY LAK R 09 PAVED 40 .270 MITCHELL CT(LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40
.330 MITCHELL DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40
.390 MOLTER RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.050 DUNBARTON LN ~PVT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
VALLEYWAY AV ~END) 1.280 LAKESIDE RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05117 VALLEYWAY CT (START) .000 LABERRY DR U 19 PAVED 37
VALLEYWAY CT (END) .100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 37
8 Records Processed
r o ~
t- ~ R ~ ~ ~1~~ D
~ ~EC 0 41998 ~ ~
~ ' ~ s~o~
C~UMY ENC~NEER ,
S P O~ A N E . C O U N T Y
BUILDING AND PLANNING ' A DIVISION OF TH~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAM~S L, MANSON, C.B,O., D~R~cTO~ D~~ttv~s M. SCOTT, P.E,, DIRECTOR
MEMOItANDUM
T0: . . . . . ' ~11
Spokane County Division of Engineering-Development Services; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Division of Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning; Jahn Mercer
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderb~
Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski ~ Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Miles
Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
Central Valley School District No. 356
Fire District No.1
Vera Water & Power
FROM: Stacy Bjordahl, Senior Plan
DATE: ~ecember 4,1998
RE: ZE-20-98; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22} ,
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
DECEMBER 17,1998 AT 2:15 P.M.
DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNXNG 15` FLOOR CONF~RENCE ROOM
Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING ~ORM for your comments, The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to
attend thls meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been ~nvited to attend this
meeting. Yf you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments
on the attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECI-~NICAL REVIEW FORMS
will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and
Planning file. Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-3675.
NOTE: The Division of Building & Planning will now be circulating comments for SEPA
Checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only time you will be
able to comment re~ardin~ the S~PA Checklist for this ~roject.
c: Paul S. Redlin, I'.0. ~ox 244, Veradale, WA, 99037
Dwi~ht J, H~ime, 1Q7 S. Howard, Suite 325, Spokane, WA. 99201
Simpson Engineering clo Charles Simpson, 909 N, Ar~onne Rd., Spokane, WA. 99212
Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, SEAA Checklist
IOZ6 WEST BItOADWAY AVENUC • SPOKANF., WASHIhJGTON 9~2~Q PMONr: (509) 456-3675 • F~x; (509) ~5b-~703
TDD; (5Q9) 324-316d
f 1
~ y
1
Spokane County
Divisian of ~uilding & Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: December 17,1998 @ 2:15 p.m.
Aroject File No.: ZE-20-98
Project Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Valley Way, east of
Sullivan Road within the SE'/4 of Section 14, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.N1.
Spokane County, Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban and Commercial.
Project Description: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22} for those uses allowed within the Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) zone. ~
Parcel No(s): 45144.1132, .1142.
Applicant/Owner: Paul S. Redlin
Project Planner: Stacy Bjordahl
~ ~ a
. ~--~0 - . .
~ . . ou~vTYDv soNO~~u ~a'~NGAND LANN NG
5po~~ANEC ,
REC~IVED
ZONE RECLASSiFiCATION APf'LICATION ~paKaN~ c~~N~r
oEC o2 ~9~~ P~RY I
GENERAL INFORMATION, DIUlSION OF 6UIl~DINC~ANn PI~ANNINQ
P~~ii~], RPdlin aY; Legal Owner
P.O.~ox 244 '
Mailing Address ~
Veradale State Zip Code 9 9 0 3 7
City ~ .
Phone 9 2 918 5 (Work) ~Home) Fax ~
Appiicant/Agent Dwight J. Hume , ,
Mailing Address Su i te 3 2 5 10 7 S. Howard S t. ~
Cily Spokane State W~ Zip Code 9 9 2 01 ,
Phone , (Work) 456-7402 Fax ~-~7
IF APPLICANY IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZAI'ION FOR APPLICANT TO
SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
Projectlproposal site area ~acres or sq. ft.} ?~es
Adjacent area owned or controlled ~acres or sq, ft,} none
Assessor's arcel numb~rs of projectlproposal 4 514 4.113 2& 114 2 p
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned orcontrolled None
Street ~ddress of proposal N. 412 Cenury Lane ,
Existing zone classification(s) and date established UR- 7 19 9 3 ,
Existinc~ ~ise of property ~arage and approved Mobile Home Court ,
Proposed zoninc~ UR-22 ,
Compreh~nsive plan category Urban & Comme~~alldistrict CV
Water purveyor Vera , Fire district FD # 1
Proposed use of property:
Sin~le family dwellings O Duplexes Multifamily dwellings O
Manuf~ctured homes ( } Dusiness ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ( )
Ofher Describe ~nd bro e s s i on~l ~
List previous planning division actions involving this properiy 9~
n I r_nni 17n~~r_ (7r_n~ n~~ir_~nnTin~i I~ir_n~nenTin~i
l~. LLl.7/\LI~IIIVE: IN CI.iLM.)~711 II~N 1 IVIV IIVI LllN lvit\ I IVIv
Location of proposal N. 412 Century Lane (NWC Valleyway & Sullivan )
~ Section 14 1"ownship 25 Range 44
,
Nc-ime o(Public road(s) providing access Val 1
► ~ i
UVidlh of properly fronting on public rocid UJ' P
; I
' ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATI~" ~'LICATION PAGE 2 of 4
, . ~
Does the proposal have access to an arteria! or ~lanneci,~rterial? Yes No
Name(s~ of arterial roads .
Lec~al description of pronerty for each zone reclassification proposed ,
5 t~ ~
Cxisting zone(s) UR 7 to proposed zone(s) UR 22
~ ,ar the following described property.
Attach legal description st~mped by land surveyor or provide below.
~
.
If you do not hold title fo the property, what is your interest in it?
~ ~ ~,v~
What are the changed conditions of the area which you fec~l make this proposal warranted?
,
Whaf impac~will ~he proposed zone reclassificafion have c~n the adjacent properties?
e~ G~ s ~
What factors support the zone reclassification?
e Q;~'"a~~ ~
~
UVhat measures do you propose fo mitigate your propos~l's impact on surrounding land use?
1 ~ '
~ .
~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 'LICATION ~ PAGE 3 of Q
. ' * ~
PARY II
1 t
This section of the application will provide the Division of Building and Planning staff with written
verification that the applicant has had preliminary consulfation wifh the agencies identified,
Results of the preliminary consultation shall be incorporated in tl~e proposal before final submittal
to fhe Division. ~
, ,
F RE MARSHALLIFIRE DISTRIC1'
A. This proposal is within Fire Protection Districf No.
B. dequafe arrangements (have) (have not~ been made to meet our needs in providing for an
a quate water system and facilities for fire protection pur~oses.
C, Rec mended fire flow u'~~~ ; or unable to calculate now because use is not~
defini~ e; and will be determined at time of building permi~ applica~ion. ~ ~
D. Require ents include i`~~ ~G'~' , ' ~ / 1 ~ r.
~ • - l~~`~C_ ~7 ~ ~ rl . ° ~ s~ ~c¢ F~.~ , ~ ~ ~ k ~
ire Distric ignaturelTitle Date ~ !
WA7ER PURVEY~R
A. Satisfacto arran ments for domestic water and fire flow requirements~(have~ (have not) ry been made. .
E3. Requirementslcomme ts .
n ~
~ ~ t ~F ap~, ~0.9~ . ~
Water District Sic~naturelTitle Date
: ~ .
; COUNTY ENGINCER
A preliminary discussion has taken place nd general requirements for roads and drainage have
been discussed wilh the applicant.
A. Comments
SignaturelTifle Date
. f .
COUNTY UTILITIES
A preliminary discussion h~s fa~ten place and general requi m~nts for submittal of this proposal (I~ave) (have not) been satisfied. The designated water pu eyor for this site is
~
A. Comments
~ SignaturelYit{e Date
~EGIONAL NEALTN C~IS7RICT'
A preliminary discussion I~as taken place and ganeral requirements for sub 'ttal of this proposal
(have) (have not) been sarisfied.
A. Cornments ~ ~ ~~~rG/~~✓
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~/J. ~ ~ _ l~, _
. .itl 'eX'j'"~-
' aturelT Date
SEWER PURVEYOR
A prelirninary discussion Iias talcen place and general requiremF;nts for the provision of p lic
sewer are understood by the applicant,
A. Commenfs
SignaturelTille Date
.
ci • 4
l~ ~~U
.
~ ZONE RECLASSiFICATI~ ~~PPLICATION , PAGEa o~4
~ ' .
.
' 1.`` l~._ , ~
PART I I I ~oF w'~sk
c;;~. .
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ~ ' . ~ ~
tl~ i formation re ueste ~.t~e ` r~o~ ~ I, the undersigned, a(~censed land surveyor, have completed e n q , J~, ~ ~
zoning map an d wri t ten lega l descnp~ion ~ ~ 4~?.
~ . ,
, oafF i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Si~ned ~ ~ ~ ~ E. ~r~~7/y~
Address _~1 . ~n ~ ~ Phone ~Z ~ ~ ; ~ 7_ l_
Cit ' , State Z~p ,~.~.s'J.~.~
Y ~
PART IV
SIGNATURE ~F PROPERTY ~WNERS OR LETI'ER 4F AUTWORIZAI'ION
I, Ihe undersigned, swear or affirm under penalty of perjury th~t the above responses are made
trulhfully and to the best of my knowledge.
I further swear or affirm that I arn the owner of record of the area proposed for the previously
identi~e~ land use action, or, if not the owner, attached herewilh is wrilten permission from the
owner authorizinc~ my actions on hislher behalf.
Si ned ~ ~ ~ DatE ~ - ~ 9
d ess S-~ ~/D S Phone ~~~(o - 7~oZ Ad r ~
City ~ . Srate ~4 ~ Zip ~ ~
• - 2'g ~
Signa u appli t or repre ta +ve Date
State of Washington ) ~
) ss:
County of Spokane ) r~~ ~
Si ned and sworn or affirmed before me on fhis `r tlay of • 9 9
• ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i9/` * , d ~~r/~ ay. , ~ r
. ~ Nota►~+~,~A'•,!~~ ' . .
~ :p Notary Publi in and for lhe te of Washington residing
, n ~ . , ~,~Y 'a 1~ ~ ~t : ; ~ ' ~ / ~ , , ~`r ~ at
~lc,:~ . ~
• a • a o~ntment ex ~res ~ ~ ~ . 011 ` MY pp p . , ' t .
. . - . - ~ . ~ ~ . , . . 1 v .
, , , ` ' PART V ~
TO BE COMPLETED ~Y TWC OIVISIQN OF E3UILDING AND PI.ANNING
o~ ~ g File number ~ ~ Dafe submitted - - ~
Date acce ted d~, o~ ~ B p _ , ~ Y
~L ~ ~ ~ Rece~ t number Total fees ~ ~
~
~
I
~
~
~
t-NEI Ilt1(itlE AI'Pl R191 01
~ t
~ ` >
►
Letter of Authorization
I, Paul Redlin, owner of the subject property of this rezone, hereby authorize
Dwight J. Hume to represent my interest in the above matter as it relates to the zone
reclassification of my property.
~
.
Paul S. Redlin, ~wner
8 ~
~ ~
` ` CLARENCE E. SIMPSON ~ ~ .
im son n i neers, n~r ~ 1901-1987
► RICHARD L. SIMPSON ,
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS CHARLES E. SIMPSON FOUNDED 1946
Licenced rn Washingion and Idaho
N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99212
l5Q91926-1322 Fax:926-1323
PR~PERTY DES~RIPTI~N
The East 53 feet of the West'/z of Tract 56 of Vera, according to Plat recorded in Volume "4" of Plats, ~age 30
in Spokane County, VVashin~ton;
T4GETHER WITH the West 78 feet of the East '/z of Tract 56 of Vera;
At,S~ TOGETHER WTTH the following described Parce~
The East 53 feet of the West 131 feet of the East'/z of Tract 56 of ~era;
EXCEPT the North 31 S feet and
ALSO EXCEPT the South 180 feet
~.~t~..,`~ 1, ~ I,~~
~~p~ wAS~i , j~ ~ , ~ ~ .
~ x~~ f~
s ~ ~
1~~~ 'y ~ ~ 9967 , , ~
~ ' ~~r1Si~ti"', ~ fj~N~
~L t.AI~
EXPIRES 7~iT~ ~
t ~
~ Rezone Supp~ement
UR-7 to UR-22
Redlin Rezone
~Vhat are the changed conditions of the area, wtjic~~ you feel, make this proposal
warranted?
The subject property was part of a rezone to UR-7 in 1993 to accommodate duplexes and
manufactured housing units. In the interim, both a power center and a regional mall have
been built within the vicinity and Sullivan Road has had significant increases in traffic
volumes To accommodate this increase, Sullivan Rd. was widened from four lanes to six
lanes with a center left turn 1ane. Sewer was extended at the same time that the road was
rebuilt.
,
Therefore, new commercial activity is occurrin~ alon~ Sul~ivan Rd. and the adjacent B-2
site is nov~ a new bank with drive-through windows. ~ther reta.il improvements include a
strip center, fast foods, credit unions, service station and restaurants. With this increased
tra~ic and interest in retail activity, other support services have expressed strong interest
in locating within this vicinity. Hence, the subject site is now bein~ considered for office
rather than residential uses.
'What impact will the proposed zone reclassiCcation have on the acijacent
properties?
In 1995, the subject property was administratively approved for a 10-lot mobile home
park. Each unit was ociented east-west a~ainst the adjacent six residential lots to the west.
This proposal places two o~ice structures at opposite ends of the site and has parking on
the remainder. Orientation of the buildings is nor~h-south rather than toward the
residential on the west. As a land use, office's can be more compatible, due to their "9 to
5" uses, clased evenings and weekends. Thus, the adjacent residential uses should have
minimal exposure to office activities.
The site will be improved with site obscuring fencing and landscaping pursuant to
applicable standards of the Zone Code. Access is via an existing private lane, (Century
Lane} and ingress and egress is onto Valleyway without direct impacts onto nearby local
access streets. The offce buildings will be two-story and will provide a transitional buffer
to the residential uses on the west boundary.
Accordingly, the proposed site plan and use should have minimai impact to surrounding,
more restrictive uses.
Wti~t f~ctors s~~pport tl~e zone recl~ssific~tion?
The subject property is located both, within the Urban and Major Gommercial categories
of tlle Comprehensive Pl~n. As such the Transition Policy applies. This is an area which
~ i
, Redlin Rezone Supplement -continued '
can allow developments complying with either of the Land Use categories dependent
upon the decision maker's site-specific approval. The "Urban Category" is intended to
provide the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which includes
various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities and services
(water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other features}. It is
important to note that all of these services are adeqr~crtely available.
The "Major Commercial Category" is intended to provide the opportunity for
development of commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers
and cammercial uses, directly related to major throughways. The sc~b~ject property adjorns
the exrsting 7~ses, which front on Sullivcrn Rc~, a major throughway.
From thew above descriptions, it would seem more appropriate for the Urban Category of
uses to be allowed. Accordingly, the following Goals, Decision Guidelines and
Objectives may apply from the Urban Category. It is important to note that there are
specific goals, decision guidelines and objectives for "office uses". Since they are first
allowed by the same zones whrch allow higher density residential uses, we will address
this proposal under applicable multi-family criteria as follows:
Go~l 1.1 ~ncourage a variety of housing types and densities.
Qbjectivei.l.~ Promote fill-in within established areas and existing outlying
communities where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities have already been
established. Thes~ servrces and rnfrastrr~cilrre adeqzrcrtely serve the s~rbject prop~rty. No
addrtional services are tleeded to accommadate these proposed o~ce bl~ilc~iflgs~.
Objective 1.1.b Hi~her density developments such as multi-family and mohile home
parks should be located with direct or near direct access to the major arterial systems
rather than on interior neighbarhood streets. Access to pub~ic transportation should be
considered emphasis mine). The s~rbject property is an approved 1 D-lot mohile home
park. It is th~~s considered an appropriate location for hlgher c~ensity zcses such. Indeed, it
is presetztly zoned UR-7, ~vhich rs adequate to accommodate the mobile h~me dej~sity, btrt
not adeq~rate to allaw o~ce xrses. It is also direc~ly accessea~ by Valleyway c~nd nearby
Srrlllvajl Road, th~rs mij~inrizijlg its impacls lo lhc residejltial f~eighborh~oc~ adjacertt ~o
th~ west.
Ubjective l.l,c VVhen multi-family dwellings are to be located adjacent to single-family
areas, careful consideration must be given to the density and design of the multi-family
development to ensure protection of the amenities of the single-family area.
Decision Guidelines 1.1.3 A multi-family structure exceeding three residential
units or a development of such structures or manufactured homes should:
a} locate adjacent designated arterials;
b} lacate near existing or planned public transit routes,
2 ~
~ .
- ~ ' „
F Redlin Rezone Supplement -continued ~
c} improve or maintain the consistency of adjacent single-family area amenities.
Th~ strbjeet proposal is sit~ platljz~c~ to of~lent the hlrila~~►~gs crway ft•otn th~ i~v~.sterly
residential land ~rses. 7~ie blrildings will be lrmited to two-story strTrct~rres arrd the height,
b7rlk and charaeter of th~ stl~~ict7rr~s wrll he re,s~id~~r~tial irr nat»re. I~, roaf piteh, h~rildrng
sYZe, siding, l~Vlj?dO1~VS, lighting etc. will be consistent with materials used for residential
constriiction. Landscaping and fencrng pzersuant to zone code standards will also ass~~re
land ~~se compatibilrty.
Go;~11.5 Encourage a healthful and pleasing environment in the county's residential
areas.
Objective 1.5~ New residential or multi-family development should be buffered from
existing adjacent land uses where advers~e affects may develop.
Decision Guidelines
1.5,1 Buffering should be used to mitigate the differences between proposed
developments and existin~ uses.
1.5.2 Landscapin~ may be rec~uired to provide a healthful and pleasin~ residential
environment.
The ahave gaal, decisi~n g~rideline and objeetive statements are being~ met by the site
plan desig~l and performance stat7dar~u~s proposed aj~d imposed hy the zone code.
Ob j ectives:
1.5.b Encourage installation of underground utilities.
1 he s~rbject site will hrrve ~~ndergro~md ~rtrlitres.
1,5.c Encol~ra~e p~ved street and sidewalks in existin~ and future developments where
they are appropriate to the nature of the development, A pc~ved privcrte drive~vcry serves
th~ s~~bj~ct srte wrth 32' 0, f~aVljlg 111CI?1C~1j1~' a 3' pathway ~r~1cl thrckened eclge fnr
drainage control. d ther parking areas wrll be p~rv~d as well.
1.5.e When a neighborhood experiences pressure for change in character, such chan~e
shall be permitted upon appropriate review. The area has changed corrsic~erably ~~vith the
major arterial lmprovemer►ts, regional nrall and power eenter provrd~ng the pressr~re for
more retail ~rnd support services. Increase~ traf~c h~rs added to the a►emand for mor~
retail and the adjacent residential area,s are experrencing the change of la~1d irse ajid
services for their area. ~'hrs proposed o~ce site rs a mani fe.station of this change and
c~emand~'or more services. Wlth lhis appropriate review process, the use with mitigation
.sho~~ld be approved.
1.5.f Consider the profile, especially hei~ht, of existing neighborhood when evaluating
multi-family developments. As stated above, the offtce strZrct7rres wazrla~ be limrted to
two-story str~ccticres, where as the adjacent residential ~rnits ar~ 1'/z stot y dl~plex's. That,
3
~ .
t ~
~ ~
Redlin Rezone Supplement -continued
~a cther ~vith the landscape screenir~g and site plc~flt~irlg per site plan of record wilt
assirre adeqzrate protection of the neighborhood pt~ofrle and' character.
If the proposed use were considered in part to be "commercial", the following
Commercial Goals, Objectives Guidelines and Objectives would apply:
Decision Guideline
6.1.8 Appropriately buffered multi-family residential development, compatible with
existing and potential commercial activities, may be permitted as a transition between
high-intensity uses (for example, commercial uses) and low-intensity uses (for example,
single-family uses), especially when the commercial activities can provide or share waste energy. As stated above, the subject property is bisected hy the two categories and thrs
praposed o~ce z~,se may servc as a more appropriate lajzd use transition between low-
intensity dl~plex's and retail cet~ters along Sz~llivan Road. ~
Other goals, objectives and decision guidelines applicable to this proposal are listed
below without specific mention of each one. A summary comment to these is provided
below.
Water Quality
Go~110.1
Objective 10.1.~, b, c.
Decision Guidelines 10.1.6c
Objectives 10,1.d
Decision Guideline 10.1.7 b, c;10.1.8;10.1.10;
Ob j ective 10.1.0
The ahove p~rtains to water qr~ality proteciioji hy aa~eqliat~ ,sewering of both damc,stic
and storrn sewer waste. The suhject property is able to co»nect to sewer and 208 starm
dr~ainage wrll be approv~d and implemented on slte.
Energy Management
Go~112.1
Objective 12.1.c
Decision Guideline 12.1.2 ~
Objective 1Z.1.e,12.~.f
Decision Guidelines 12.1.3a, b
The above goals, objective,s and a~ecision g~ridelirres pertain to locatYjzg zrses within areas
that encozrrage fewer tYrps between work and h~me. This office service co~,rld provide
both, employment and .s~rvices th7~s, redi~cing the amoz~nt or dlrration of trips.
Goal 22.2
Objective22,2a,
4 ~
, .
' t ►
~ ~
Redlin Rezone Supplement -continued
Decision Guideline22.2.1
4b j ective 22.2b
Decision Guideline 22.22
Th~ c~bave goals, objectives ana~ d~crsion giridelines refer ta the ad~qxracy of ~vater for damestic, fire and other purposes. ~hey also refer to the protectiotl of ihe aquifer from
storm water a~ischarg~. This proposal wozrld have adeqz~ate pl~blic water atld the
c~rainage woi~ld be cont~ollea~ throz~gh approved 208 storm pond systems.
Since water and sewer facitities are existing and provided to the site, no other goals,
objectives and decision guidelines are listed.
In summary, the project is within an area of changed conditions, experiencing strong
retail growth and associated traffic build-up. Furthermore, the project complies with the
above applicable goals, objectives and decision guidelines of the comprehensive plan
text.
What measures do you propose to mitigate yo«r proposat's impact on surrounding ~
land use?
The development will be s~rbject to the site plan af recora~ and any rnrtigation impased hy
the hearings examrrter c~s determined from srrbseqzrent inp~rt and review. The interzt o f this
design in terms of bulk, scale, height, blrf ferrng and access demonstrates adeqi~ate
protectio~~ of thc s~rrrol~»d~f7g r~.~idet~tial ar~a.s.
5
♦ a
~
REC~I~I~~
SPOKAN~ CDUN1"Y
DEC 0 21
DIVISI~N OF BUII.DINQ ANQ PLANNING
BY:
SP4KANE ENVIR4NMENTAL ~RDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230~ 1)
~ ,
SPOY,ANB ~'t1VIA0tMENLL OtDIHANCE ~
~ (uAC 19~-1I-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Environaantil Checkli~t
File `10.
Purpo~e of Checklirt: ~ '
The St~te Enviromentil Policy Act (SEPA) chapcer 43.:1C RL1i, reQulre~ all gover~ent~l ~gencie~ to con~ider the enviro~ment~l impaccs of a proposa: before makieg deci~ion~. An Envlronrent~! Lp~et Stit~r at (eIS) au~c be pr~p~red Eor ~11 propoiils vith probible eignlficint ~dverae 1~aaccs or
the quslity of t~e enviroc~eat. The purpo~e of chif checkli~t i~ to provtd~ lefocm~tion to help yau ~nd the agency identifv tmp~cts fTaa vour propo~al (~nd to reduce or ~void impac[~ froa the pcopo~~l~ if tt caa ~e done) ~cd to help the ~gency decide vhether an fIS is required,
In~tructioa• for Applic~at~;
Tt►is environaencal checkliet ~~k~ you to de ~crib~ sase bu ic infotatcion ~bout your propo~al. Goveramentil igencies u~e this checkllsc to decec~lne
vhethet the environoental iop~cts of your propo~~l a~e sigaific~nc~ requi~ing prep~rition of •a EIS. Ans~ec che Questio~s briefly, ~ith the most preci~e infocm~tian kno~n~ oc give the be~t de~cripcion you caa.
You vust ~nswer e~ch queatioa accur~tely and ca~eiully~ to the bt~t of your knowledge. In ~oat ct~es, you should be able to art~we~ che questions
fre~ your orm obaerv~tion: or pro~RCt plin~ vithouc the ne~d to hire experti. If you ~e~lly da aot knov che aaaver~ ar if ~ qurstion does noc appl~ to your pcopoa~l, vrite "do not knov" or "doe~ noc ~pply.' Ca~pl~te an~ver~ to the Que=tion~ nov m~y avoid unneceas~~v detavs :~cer.
Some question~ esk about govers~ent~l regulition~~ auch ai =oning, ~boreline~ and landmark deaign~tion~. An~~r cheee Quescions it you can. I.' vo►~
hive problem~~ the gove rnm~nt~l ~genciea c~n a~~i~t you.
The checklift queetion• ~pply to •11 p~rt~ ot you~ propoNl, ew n lf rou pl~n to do them over ~ period of cl~e or on differenc oaccels of land. Atcach ~ny additional iefocmation th~t ~ill d~~ertDe yaur propo~~l or its environrental etf~ct~. The igen~y to ~hich you submic chis checklisc ~a~•
~ak you co explain your anivera or pr~vide ,~dditio~ul lator~~tion reaionably related to determining if chere m~y be significant idverse ~mpacc,
U~e of checkli~t for naaproj~ct propo~als:
Complete thls checklist for nonproject propo~ale, even though que~cion~ o~y be ine~ered 'does not apply'. IN AADISION~ camplete the SUPPLLKEN?AL S~L? F4l NONPxOJBCf ACTIOHS(Part D).
For nonpra~ect actione, the referencee in the thecklisc to the votd• 'project," `ipplicant,' ~nd "propercy or site~ ahould be read as "propoaal.~
"propoee~," and "~ffected geogt~phic ara reapectively.
A. BACKGAOtJND
1. !lame of propoaed pco jecc ~ if ~pplic~ble: ~jf' /~~(J~j~,~,~~
. 2. !l~me of Applicant; ,,(iyv~ ~ ~Q/~~j' ~ ,~6•{J/~~~ ~J~►'!~~
s ~ 7. Addre~t ~nd pho~a nuob~r of •pplicint er cont~ct personc S!~/T~.~ ~Q 7 ~~'j~(fQ, ~/~f
u~ 9z,~1 ~,~?o - 7 ~D Z
Date checkli~t p~ep~ced: ~ f/ 9~
S. Agency ~eque~ting checkli~t; ~ ,U ~ ~ ~ ~/y/'~yG ~ ~~1~G// , ~ /'~~/~rJ~ ,
~ U ~ ~ 6. Propoaed timing e~ ~chedule (includiog phuing~ tf ~pplic~ble):
~~r~ - ~v~,~ ' ~s,f" 4f~rCe ~v/~c~~ ~ ~ ~ vr~'
~ ~
Oo you hive ~ny pla~• for future ~ddition~~ exp~n~lon~ or further ictlvity related to or connected vith thls propoe~l? If ves, expiitn.
~,~P~ s,~ ~~~~w~a~ J~ ~ r/~'K 1' ~Ze.
~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ a~dQ bv ~ ar ~ v~~~s .
~ ! ~ ~ b. Oo you ovn or h~ve optione on land ne~rby ar idiu~nc to thi~ propoe~l? If ye~~ explain.
,~U
~ B. List any environaencal lrtform~tion you kno~+ ~bout th~t h~a betn prepared~ or vill be ptep~red, di~ectly rela ed to thi~ propoaal.
. /D~,~%~ ~~~I'/~~:.~~~~. ~ r/ s v d s ~~s~ /`d~~~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~
s~,
(WAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.:30(1)
~iut~ .
~ ~
~ SpOKANB ENYIROI~NTAL OBDINANCE
(WAC 191-11-4b0) Section 11.10.:30(1)
A. BACxCR0UN0 (continued)
9, Do you kno~ vhet~e~ ~pplicitioni •Te pending for govetnmeatal tpptov4ls of ot~er propo~ils directly ~ffecting the property covered by vour propoial' If ye~~ explaln.
~ '
10. Lfic ~~y governaeat ~pprov~l~ or peraita th~c v111 be needed for your propo~al~ !f knovn. . ~ -
~ ~l.~. /!~k ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~
~
11. Give Driet, cca plete deictlption of your p~opoi~l~ intludia~ the pcopo~ed w es ind che ~lse of the project and site. There are several Queation~ later in thia checrlitt that ~~k you to deacribe certain iapect~ of your propo~al. You do not need to repe~t those ansvers on this
P+6e• ~
~ G~ ~ re ~!G ~!/YI~~ ~v~~YT '/l~ v/~ i~3 ~ C~QjG ~ ~ r~~`~' ~ ,~vr~~J~ 's . 7~C~~ o~~ ~0~~~~1h ~o~l~
~'e d ~ ~1~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
a~~-~ ~ ~
1:, Locacion of the prepo~al. Give sufficient infatsation to ~ petso~ co under~c~nd che preci~e loucion of your proposed pco~ecc, tncluding a acreet ~ddre~~~ if ~ny~ ~nd u ction~ to~mihlp •nd ~~n~e~ if knorm. If ~ propo~al vould occuc avet a range of area, provide che range or
~oundarie~ of the site Provide ~ legal de~ctlptioa~ ~ite plan~ vitinity Qap, ~ad topogrzphic map~ lf re~aon~bly ~villable. '+Ihile You should suboic any plani ceQuiced by the agency~ you are not ~eQuired to dupllcite aip~ oc det~lled pl~ne aubalcted vich ~ny peca~it applicatfon
celiced to thl~ ch~ckliic. c~dfl ~ ~ ~~LB~t Jl-
1~b// a~ ~ ~s'1.~ ~u~ ~ /
~°X~s r ` '~2~~'~ ~d~lti~r.+~` , ,
13. Doe~ the propo~ed ~ction lie vithie the Aquifer Sen~itive Are~ (ASA)? The Ceneral Sever Secvtce Acea' The Priority Se~er Service A~ea.' fie City of Spokme? (S~e: Spokane CouQty'~ ~1SA Oveclty Zooe Atl~~ fo~ boundariet),
r~'3 A~ 6SSa~ ~DSS~ • .,rd l/l~~ ~
1'0 BE COMPLETBD 8Y APPLICAHT
p. ENYIRONl~HTAL ELY?~HTS Evaluacion For
Agencv Use Onlv
1. EAR1'N a. Cener~l description of che site (circle one) Fl~t~ olling~ hilly~ :teep 9lopes~ mountainous,
other: ~
b. Whic the ~taepest ~lope on the ~ite (~ppro:loace pere~nt ilope)?
c. What gener~l cype~ of ~oil~ are fouRd on th• ~ite (for ex~ple, cliy~ ~ind~ gr~vel~ pe~t~ muck)? If you know the cl~~tific~tlon of ~~ricultuc ooili, s city thsr and note ~ny pcioe Eicml,nd.
~ '
d. Are chere surface lndicacioni or hiitory of unitible soll~ in the i~edi~te vicinity? If ~a~
deocribe. ~
'
~ ~ t
gp01UNE FKYIRONlQNTAL ORDIHANCE
~ (WAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.:30(1)
B. ENYIAOtil~Ntl►L ELEl~NTS (continued) Evaluation Fo~
Age~cv ~se O~ly
Estim~te the amount of flll and dcedge oacerial chat vould be pl~ced 1~ o~ cemoved from the surface vat~r oc veclands ~nd indicace the ~rea of the site that ~ould be iffected. Indlcate
che source of Eiil ~teri~l. •
,
(4} Will the pcopo~al requtre surf~ce wter vithdr~val: or diversiona? Clve general descrip- tion~ purpae~ and sPp~oxiIDate Qu~ntlties if koovn. ,
,
(5) Do~a the propo~al lie vithln ~ 100-ye~c flood pl~in? If ao~ note location on the slce plan.
f~n .
(6) Ooes che ~ropoa~l lnvolve ~ny dischargea of vaate miterials to surface ~,ters? If 9a,
describe the type of wite ~nd ~nticip~ted voluve of di~tharge.
,~v .
b. CROUND;
(1) Will ground vater be vithdravn~ oc vill witer be di~chirged to ground viter' Glve geeeral deecription, purpo~t~ ~nd ipp~axim~te aw nticie~ if kno~rn. ,
~~,C~ / ~ ~ G~~SCGIiv~~ .
(2) D~~cribe v~~te aiteri~l ch~t vill b~ discharged into the ground frem septlc t~nks oc other
~aaitary vi~te tr~ata~nc E~cility. Oeacribe the gene nl si:e of the system, the numDer of houses co be ~erved (!t applic~ble) or the number of pereons the eyetem(~) are Qxpected to ~erve.
~ '
f3) Describe any sy~temt~ other th~n tho~e deaigned for the dispoeal of sanitary ~aste, lnstalled for the purpoee oE discharging flulds belov the ground surface (includes sy~tems such
~s tho~e to~ the di~po~al of ~corm v~tsr o~ drii~age fram floor drataa). Deecribe the type of 9y~tea~ the amount of outtcl~l to pe di~po`~d of through the ~yatem ind t~e types of m~terial~
likely to De diapo~ed of (including macerial~ vhich ~ay encer the ~yecem tnadverceocly chrough 9pills or a~ a re~ult oE fire fighting activitie~).
, ~ ~~'/Yi.i ~i~-e.,. ~ ~ ~
. ~ ~
(6) utll any chemic~la {especlally org~nic ~olvents or petroleuo Euels) be stored ln abave grou~d or und~rground stor~ge tanka? IE ~o, ~hat types and qu~ntities of materials ~ill be
stored? ~
~ a ~
,
SPOi~ANE EHVIRONlQN?AL O1t~LNANCE ~ (i1AC 191-11-4b0) Seccion 11.10.230(i)
e. ENVIRON!(PH?AL ELLltEN?S (continued) Evaluation Foc
Agency Use 4nlv (S) i~it protective d~i~urea ~ill De t~k~n ta i~iure ch~t letka or spill~ of iny chemiczla
stored o~ u~cd on aite vill not bt ~lloved to percolate co ground ~acer (thi9 include9 mei~uree co Keep cheaicils out oi di~pos~l ~y~t~~~ de~cribed in 3b(2) ind 3b(3)?
~i~1uti~'Y~ ~~Y ~
~ ~ ~ .
c. W~ter Runoff iincluding storm wtec):
(1) Oeicribe che ~ource of cunoff (including stocs v~ter) ~nd aethod of collection and di~po~~l tf ~ny (include qw ntiti~~~ iE knovn). uht~e vill chi• wt~r flov' Yill thii ~rater flov lnco
ocher ~at~r~? If jo, de~cri~e.
GrY~ ./~'~{~i ~ `'J/ 1~G C~/~~t,~l~ ~
~
uill ~ny chamicala be ~tor~d~ h~ndled ot u~ed oa tho site !n ~ locition vhece a~pill ar leak ~ill d~atn co aurface or ground v~~ter or co a:tocm wter diepo~~l ~yetem dtachirging co
9uri~ce or ground w cer°
(3? Could ~~ite m~t+ecial~ enter grouad o~ surface wter:? If so, gener~lly deacribe.
d. Propa eE meaeures to reduce or cantrol iu~fue~ gtouod~ and ruoaff wter imp~cts~ if ~ny (tf tha propo~ed ~ccion lie~ vlthia the AquifRr S~n~itive Are~ be eiptci~ll~ c~~~r on explaaatlon~
relatiag to ficilitie~ coacerntag Sectloci 3b(4)~ 3b(S)~ ~ad ~~(2) ol thi• eh~ekli~tj.
. ~
~ . PUNTS a. Check or ciccle type oE veget~tien Eound on the ~lte:
~d~duouo t : ~lder, maple, a~pen~ other.
ecgrQe tr~ec fir~ c~~r~ pine, ocher. ~
ru iu .
t f8~i.
p~tture.
crop or gr~in.
vec soll pl~nes, uttiil~ buctercup~ bullrush, skuek cabb~ge~ othec.
vater plants: wter lilly~ eelgr~r~~ milfoil~ otAer.
other typee of vegetition.
b. uhat kind snd amounc eE vegetatio~ ~ill be reooved oc il ed?
f~° G ~ r~ ~ ~ ~
~5 5,~~~~ %ti N''~~~ , , ~ ~ c. Ciat threitened or endengered apec[ea knovn to be on or near the ttce.
r ' ' c~`
0. Propo~ed l~ndtcaping~ u~~ of tutive plinte~ ar othec oei~ure~ co p~e~erve o~ enh~ncE vegat~tion on the site~ if iny;
s~ s~~ ~ ~r~~~ ~
r ~
~ Y' y
SPOKANE F.NVIAON!l~NTAL OaDIZ~AHCE (YAC 19~-11-960) Section 11.10.2~0(1)
8. ENVIAOt~HTAL EI.E~H'IS (coatinued)
Evaluation For Agency L'9e Only
S . AN IltA1.5 i. Ciccle ~ay Dirdt ~nd ~nioala vhich hiva bte~ obsecved on or ne~r the ~ite or ~re knavn co be o0
or neir che site:
ird hivk~ heron~ e~gle, ~ooQbird~~ ocher:
m~mal~: deer~ beir~. ellc. b~iwr, other:
fiih; Sa~~~ ~~l~on~ trout~ herring~ ehellfi~h~ ocher:
ocher:
b. Li~t sny threa u aed or ~rdang~red ~pecie• raov~ to ba o0 or n~~r the ~ite.
~K~
c. I~ the site part of a aigr~tion reute? If ao~ ~xplain.
d. Prqpo~ed me~~ure~ to pre~erve or ~ohance vildlife~ if ~ny:
~
6. ENERGY AND NA?URAL RESO
Yhat klnda of ene~ (elec ntt ~1 ~a+~ ~ood ~tove~ ~olar) vill be u~ed to aeet the the complet~d pro)~ct s ene~~y aeed~? De~cribe vhether it vill be wed Eor Aeiting~ o~nufac-
turin~, etc.
$ ~I4~~ ~
b. uould youc pro~ect ~ffeet the potenti~l u,e of aolit energy by ~djuent pcopertiea? If so, generally GeecriDe.
r~ v
c. Vhac kind• of energy cenaecvition f~~cure• ~re included in the plena of thia proposal.' List
ocher propo~ed oe~eure~ te reduce or control energy lmpicts~ !f any:
e ~ v ~
1. ENVIROt~!(ENTAL HBALI'~I A~e thece ~ny enviror~entil heilth h~t~rd~~ including ezpo~ure to toxic chmic~l~, ri~k of fire
~nd explo~ton, epill~ or h~:ardou• w~te~ th~t could occur ~ reiult oE thi• propo~~l4 If eo~ de~ctibe.
no
(1} D~~crlbe ~peci~l eu rgency 1~ NtCf~ ch~t oi ht reQutr d.
~ ~
. + , ~
K
SPOKAIiE ENVI~ONNENTAL O~J~INAiI'l'£ b IWAC 197-11-460) Section 11.10.230(1)
B. ENVI~OHHENTAL ELEHENTS (ccnclnued)
► ~ Evaluetion For Agency l,se O~ly
ENVIRONHENTAL HEALTE{
Propo~ed meaiure~ to reduce oT concrol environmenttl he4lth ha:~rda~ tf any: ~
~~r~~
D. Nolee: , (1) What cypes of noi~e ezitc in the ~re~ vhich may affect your pro~ect (foc example: crifEic~
equipment, oper,tioo, otAer?
J9,~~,e~~~~ 't ' ,~k~~ s . ~
~ o~ Z~~-~~, ~ ~
Wh;c type~ ~nd lev~lt of noii• vould be crtit~d by or a~~ociattd vith the p~o~~et oc ~ ehorc-cerm or a long-tacm baeis (for ~uample: triffic~ CONLNCCIOQ~ op~r~tioa, otAer' Indicate
whac hours noi~e vould cooe fcom the ~ite.
c.~,~~ e ' rn~ru~~a v~~
~ ' ~.~,5 cw~ . ~
(3? P~opo~ed me~~ure to reduce or control noi~e tdpicca~ lf ~ny:
" ~ ~~~f~~ G~~ ~~G.G
~
8. UNU AND SHORELIYE USE
~at 1~ the current u~e of che ~lce ~nd ~djac~at p~opertie~?
a ~ ~ ~ r - -
~'e ' ~~sf ~s --~v8s . ~b b. ti~e the site be~e ui~d tor i~ iculture' IE ~o, de~cribe. ~
~ v
c. Deicribe iny ~tructure~ oe the •ftt.
u~ ~'~l ,31~ G~ TU /~C°~~1~ ,
~ ~
d. Wil! any structu~e~ be deQOllahed' if ~o, vhich'
~ ~
e. Wh~c i9 che current zoning cli~~lficacion of ch~ site?
What is the current cooprehen~ive plan de~ig ~tian of the stte.'
, g. If appllc~ble, vhic l~ the curtent thoc~lins o~eter pro~raa de~i~notion of the sits?
*v ~
h. Has any part of the ~ite betn cla~~ified ~n '~nvirons~ntally ~etuitive" are~? If so,
specify.
No
l. Approxim~tely hov miny p~ople vould r~~lde o~ vork !n the caapleced proiect?
~ ~d - '`~1~ ,
~ ~R ~
_ ►
SPOKANL LNVI~Otil~."~fTAI. OaDINANCE (i~AC 191-11-960) Section 11.1Q.230(1)
1. EHV~tONl~HTAL ELL?~HTS (coatiaued~
Evaluation For Agency Use Only
j, Approximacely hov uoy people vould the conpleced projecc diQplsce? ~U")'t.L
k. Propo~ed ne~~ure~ co ~void er r~duc• di~plue~eat ivp~ct~~ lf •ny: ~l'~lf
'7T
1. Propo~ed mei~ur~t to en~ure che yropo~il i~ compatible vith existing rnd projected l~nd usea ~nd
plana, if iny:
L~v+.~S Cu , vt ` ~N ~~v~'~ ~ ~~r
s ~1~G rrn ~rti, a,,t~ , ~ ~
9. NOUSINC Approxim~tely ho~ maay unita vould De provided, if iay? Indicate vhether high~ middle~ or
lovlacom~ houiinQ. „
~ ~'~G . ~ ~ ~ s Cr~K~ ~v`~i a~ , ~ ~
b. Approximat~ly ho~ many unita, tf iay, vould be elimin~t~d? Indiute vhether high~ mlddle~or
lo~-lncam• houeing. ~~n~~
c. Preposed meiiure~ to reduce or control hou~ing imp~cts~ if ~ny:
~d~
10. AfSTHE?ICS i. Wh~t t: the t~lle~c hei~ht of ~ny propa~d ~truccuce not includin~ ~nt~nnio; vh~t 1~ the
princip~l exterior euiie~~s a~t~ci~l(~} propoied'
~ S ~ U
D. What viev~ ln the i~nedi,te vicinity ~rould be alt~red or obatructed?
~1.P.~ ~ .e~,5 'Lt>~~f" w~ru~~
~ ~ ~~✓v •~,~o,~ o~~ ~ ~
c. Proposed mea w re9 to reduce o~ control ~e~thetic lmpect~, if any:
~ ~ ~j , - ~J v!'6C~' , Q,,,~. Q}~ ► . ~ , ~ ~ r~ / l .
1
11. LICHT AND CLARE a. What cype of light or glare vill the p~opo~al produce? What tlme of d~y vould !t mainly occur?
~ , ~/1 ~ c7~ tii~/~l
~ v~
b. Could light or gl~~e Erom the finiihed p~olect be ~ sifety ha:ard or lnte~fere vith vie~e?
c. Nhac existing aff-~ite eource~ of light or re ma ffect your propoial?
Y / 4 Gt~C~ ~ ~
~ ~ /1.►f ~1 J • 5' " Y
d. Propoeed me~aurea to reduce oc control light ~~d glare lmpacte~ if any:
r ' ✓P ~ ~
I
a~or,uR txvt~ac~c~'t~t, o~t~~a (uAC 197•t1-960) S~ction 11.10.230(1)
1. UN I~0lQlEN?AL LLDr(EN?S ( coot inuad ) ~ ► Evaluation For
Agency Use Only 12. RECREA?IOH
Nhit de~i~uted ~nd lafo n~l recre~tiorul opportuaitis~ ire in the ioaediitely vicintty'.
~ ~IGL .~I~i ti2~ • ~ ~
b. uould che propo~~d proj~ct di~plic• ~ny ~xi~tia~ r~creition+~l u~~~? If •o, Oe~cribe.
,
c. P~opo~ed oes~ure~ to nduce or concrol lap~et~ on r~er~~tioo~ iACludin~ cecr~~tion opportunitie~ to b~ provid~d by th~ pro~tct o~ appliciat~ it ~ny:
~
13. NIST~RIC AND CUL?U~AL P~LSBAVATION
i. Are there acy pl~ce~ or ob~ect~ li~ted oc, o~ propaed far a~ciorul, stite, or loul pTe~erva- tioa ~egi~ter~ kaovn to b~ oa or next co the ~itei It •o~ g~~erally de~cribe.
~v
Geaecslly de~cribe ~ny l~ndo~rk~ or evidence of hiico~ic ~rchaeological~ ecientific or culturil
import~nce knovn to be an or atxt ta the ~lt~.
,/J t~..Q v,vv-,,.~
c. Propo~~d ~e~~ur~i to reduce o~ eonttol iapacc~~ if ~ny:
~
1~, TAAHSPORTATION a. Idencify puplic ~creet~ snd hlgh~iy• ~~cving the titt~ tad d~~etibe pcopo~ed ~cce~~ to the
esi~ting ~tr~et iy~t~a. Shov on ~ic~ plaa , ii aoy.
~~~c1Y ~ 'e- '
~
b. I• iite cucrtntly servod by puelic tran~it? If ~ot, vhat 1~ tht approxim~te dittance co the neire~t tt~a~lt ~top? ~
c. Now m~ny p~rking ~p~tei vould ch• eoopl~t~d pro~ect h~ve' Hov oiny vould the pcoJect ellmlcute?
'~'.t~ ~
~ ,
d. Will che propo~~l reQui~e ~ny new ~ad• oc ~tr~et~, or topcove~at~ to exi~tin~ rad• or etreec~
noc lncluding driv~~~y~? If ~o~ ~en~r~lly detcribe (indic~te ~hether public or pTiv~te).
~D
e. utll the p~o~ect ui• (o~ occur in the lu~dlite vicinity at~ Mt~~, c~ll~ or ~ir tr~n~poct~tion?
If ~o, gener~lly d~~ccib~.
. ,
~ G
SPOKAHE [HVIAOMf~N?AL OaDINANCE (YAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10,2~0(1)
S. ENVIRONMEN'fAL ELEKENTS (coatlaued)
Evalu~cion FoT Agency Use Onlv
f. !{ov oaay vehicul~r ttip~ per d~y vould be generited by the campleted pro~ect? If knovn, tndicite vhen peik vould otcuc.
r ~
g. Propa~ed n~~~uce~ to ~educe or coatrol cranap rt~cion i~pict~~ !f ~ny:
1S. PUBLIC SEAVICES
a. Yould the proj~tt re~ulc i~ ~n tocr~~~~d nt~d for publtc ~ervicea (for nxsople: Plre protectton~ polic• prot~etion~ he~lth c~re, ~choal~~ other)? If io~ gen~r~lly dRicribe.
.
b. Propo~ed mea~ure~ co reduce or control direct lop~cte on public service:, lf iny:
~~~1,~
16. UTILI?IES
a. Circle uti curTent ble ~t the ~ite• lectTici n~ c~l , vater refuae service~ c lepho , ani iry ~eve , sepcfc ~y~tem~ .
b. D~~crib+ che utiliti~s ch~t ite propo~~d to~ eh~ pra)ect~ ch~ utility providi~g the s~ n+ice ~nd
the general conacruction ~ctivitie~ on the ~ite oc ln th• loedi~te vtcinity vhlch oight be n~~dtd.
C. SICNATURE
I~ the underaigned~ ~ve~~ under the pen~lcy of peryury th~t the ~bove reeponees ace made truthfully an4 to the Dest af my knovledge. I also
understand that, should there be any vlllful misrepre~ent~tion o~ ~rtllful lack of full dlscloeure o~ my part, che ~encv mav vichdra~ ~ev determination of ~on~~gniflcince th~t lt mlght l~~ue in ~ell~nce upon thts checklisc. '
0~ te : C11f d Y Pco oaent 4~l/~ 's ~ a P ~ ~
(Ple~re P~int or Type) ~ Proponent : ~~V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
dre~~,.. / ~ Phone ; `t .~.s~ ~ ~ ~v ~ v!~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ .
Person campleting forti; G1►;~i~ , D~tec g,~
Phone : ~ 7=7
POR STAPP USE ONLY
Stiff !lember(s) Revie~ing Checkll~t:
B~sed on thie ~t~ff cevi~v of the envi~onoent~l checkliit ~nd oth~r p~ctlm nt lnformation, the ~tiff:
Conclude~ th~t there ~re no probable ~ignific~nt adver~e lmpicti and recanend~ ~ deterdin~cioo of non~ignific~nce.
B. Conclude~ th~t prob~ble ~tgnific~nt idve ne eeviroruent~l iop~ct~ da exi~t for the cuccenc pcopo~il ~nd reco~nends i aitigaced deter-
min~tion of,ao~~ignific~~ce vith condltion~.
C. Concludee th~t there a~e probable ~ignificint idveree environ~entil l~pact• ~nd reco~oend• i deceroimtion of sig~tfic~nce.
lILINC PLE - $75.00
, ~
12/0211998 15:34 1-509-45 ~57 D~IGHT J NUME PAGE 02 . ~
. ~ ~ ~
,
~
SEPA S~TPPLEMENT
UR-7 to U~t-ll Rezon~
14. ~'RANSPORTA,TION
f. How many vehicular trips per day would bc gener$tcd by the completed
project? If known, indicate wher~ Qeak wou~d occur.
The subject pro,~erty is approved fvr 10 mvbrle units and a ga~ag~e for
uarmi~istrative purposes. As such the si~e i.s approved ~o generate S6 V~'D from
these 10 units and the ar~riinistrative o~f `ree.
The ,~ropased site pla» has a ran$e vf o,,~ice use and/or a~aartments. ~'hese
gerre~ate the fallawing VT
~edical 0,~'rces ~S4D0 s,~: 184 YTD
~Professronal Of~'rces (5400 sf -12SS0 s~: 1~-~1 V7D.
Ap~artments ~4 unrts (oplional) 8b Y~"D
Summary:
There are a~prozYmately S6 V~',D a~prov~ed for the si~e. ~iis will generate cm
increase runging from 159 - l27 V7'D. (1 S9 r f there is all o, f~ices, avzd 127 if ~here
!,s a combrr~rtion of a~xrrnnents, medical and profess~onal o~ces).
?~irs tra,,~c will ingress a~d egress from a~ approved priva~e ro~ad of su~c~ent
width for twa wcry tra~'rc. ?his road accesses Yalleyway necn► Sullivan. No new
ro~ad improver~ents shvuld be needed.
9
i ~ ~ 4
S okane Coun p
Public Wo~ks De artment ~
Divison o Buildin ~ Plannin
g g
Recei t p
Receipt Number: 13854 Customer Number
Pro~ects
Full
Pro~ect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owin~ PAID Pmt
98012416 1 $1,444.00 $1,444.00 $1,444.00 $1,444.00 ~
Total: $1,444.40 $1,444.00 $1,444.00 $1,444.00
Miscellaneous Items
,
Code Description Qty Pr~ce Amoirnt T~.Y PAID
ZZE0017 ZONING PERMIT 1 ~20a.0001j NUMBER ~;200.00 0.00 200.00
Comment, ENGINEER,REVIEIN,FEE FOR ZE-20- 98 FOR~I~EN` R~EDLIN . ` ~ ~
ZZU0002 LAND USE ACTI 1 104.OOOl NUMBER 140.00 0.00 100.00
Comment: UTILITIES REVIEW FEE FOR ZE-20- 98 FOR KEN REDLIN
Totals: 300.00 0.00 300.00
Total PAID: $1, 744. 00
Tender
Type Check Acct Balance CC Nbr Exp Date TENDERED
Check1 2392 . 1,744.00
Total TENDERED: 1, 744. 00
Over / (Shorl) $0.00
Change $0.00 . ~ .
Notes: ~ , . . . ; : ~ ; , ~ y, . ,
Tran Date / Time: 12191981:55:2fi PM ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,y .
By: KCumming
Logon User: kcumming
Station: KCUMMING
Override By~ . ~
Printed: 1 Z~9/981: SS: 43 PM Page 1 oJ 1
SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE 0~' COUNTY ENGINEERS
CALCULATlON SHEET
~ t~ ~ ~
Description: ~~t c.u ~~~1 tG~.~ ~~~u ~'r~~ Project No.: 26- 7`~ Colc. by: ~ A i(~,~ Date: r/~ ~9 ~ Titfe :
Checked by : Date : Sheet of
Notes:
Pos~~ 5~7~
~ , Z d~Fr~ ~~~L~S ~ 5~ ~~"2
I ~ F~~ ~E ~fi~ C z''~~J ~ D~~"" ~ r~, l 4~ ~s
,
~ P C~ ~ ~1~ ~7~
h , ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ l ['t~ ~.`•1I ~~~1~/hj ~ S~. ~ ~ X ~ ~~^i~ i
j ~ ~ ~
~ 4 ,~3 ; ~t~=s~~{~~r ~1~~'
oFF~c,~ ~ ~-9 r~~~~ks~ ~I ? ~~'~~~~r~ . ~'~n - ~~o ~ ~j ~j~~ ~ ~1 ~
~~.o~ ~~S/~~
at,~ oF~~~
G ~I~a = 1?~5~ ~'fi~' l7,~~ ~sr .
17~5.5 ~ 1~ Z~,~ -~rs~s .
o~-~~~ ~ ~r ~
, ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~.S ~ a ~C ~ l 4 ~4 P~' c,t ~r ►-r.~ ~
l U ~ 11 1 T ~ r~~ Z✓ ~ 5 T~ f(c?.S
~ts ~ ~ ~ -T^~r 1; ~ ~ ~ d ~c~ .
- ~d~~,v1~ - 3a .~~~#~'~~c. °T~-~~t.~~l= , ~u~.~.t~1~~1 ~~c,.
Z~ ~ b.3o = ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
3 ~~u v~- ~ ~ 5o i , ~t . g S ~T,e ~e~
~~oJ~~~' = ~ ~
~ ~ ,
; ~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ ,
E, r ~
~ ~
• • ~
~ ~ ~
. ~ ~ i ` , J _
j ~ I ~ , ~
. .
` ~r~~ \ h : ~ fi~
~ \ r'j ~ • ~
1 ~ ~ • 1 ` \ ` ` ~ ` . ~ 1~~ ~~~r+ J .
. ~,~~D~~ . . ~ _ ~ : ,
. ~ ` ` ~ , ~ ` n 1, I ~ . . ..iy . , + ~ ` ` s-
- ~ I ` _ '
. ~ "i~~-
~ ~
~ ~ ~ .~-,~y,,.~N V E ~ .
~
~ ~ 1 I .
d ~ , a ( . L: ~i y ~ - ;~r
~ ~ _ ~ ~ - . ~~sj o 3 ~ ~ ~ - A : ~0~ .~5~ .
. J ~ ` ~ K . ' ~ 1
. ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ' ' r ~R I D~G E ~
~ ` : ~ ~ ; . Ns 4'~C~ 6 ; ~ O ~ , I
~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ) : , ~
- ~ - - ~ ° ~
~ ~jR~I~~~y~~y' ~uF. ' AV~, Y ~ ~
~ , ~ . . ~rirC
~1 1~M..•~ ~ ~p,,.~, 5~G ; j pr ' . ~ o9rc5~~ t ~
~ ` w 3 • ~ o , ~ ~ , r , . . . • ~ ~ , ~ x • : ~ .
✓ ~ .~cct r~o ~ a~. o . - 5.~. -
~ ~ a ~
' o Q ~ ~ ~ , J ~ { ~ ~ ; . I ' n
~ ~ ~ , r.•: ~ ~nl t ~ `~l ~ ~ ~ i i~1.'ir.~Y1~i~+Aw~ ~ ~ ~ ,I,~ 1 .~9 `..~.1.... . ~d` ~4, ; . . ~.r4.L.~' ~ . . f~ ~yA ~s~ ' 'r~
' { ~
. v r+a~ot O N U1 ~ z ~
> ~ a ~ ~ r ~ M~~~~ _
A, N aa , _ . . _ - r ~ -
R I ~ . ` , ) _1 .
C _ a' Y ~ L
~ ~y ~ . 5 PRAGl1 E ~r ~ ~
• ~ 1 ~ 'Yy•. ~'I / ~ • ~~[S.J~~ ' 1 ~ ~ .~r' 1 ~ ~ `r_~f . ~ ~ ~ , . ) .F • RJ id . ~ ~ ~ ~ « ~ ~
~ • .1
T Vf ,~a~LE ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ,
zN0 _ ~ _ . _ . ~ ~ ~ _~Er' ► ~ -
_ ~ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - ~ , . . . . ~
Notto Scale 12104198 N' V~iCINf~'Y MAP
r
I
UR-15 ' - i
~ B-2
, tJt 90 NeY7E'17'~ - ~ ~w ~ ~..aou~ wo n . t.~ry
~0 110 ~G ~N~ ~ { +q+ Sqw OOwKI~y ~~w ~i "^~'Y
f..wy a N YY~OIR ~ , ~ ~ C w~n.r ~q.i (~p~sl ~ G~e.~p °'e^ a~,~
~~n ?....y.~... ..s ~ ~i 8-I
- - ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - • I ~ C r ~ro► svM oe.rra.q r.s. at e... • ` ! ~ UR-7 ~ I -1«~.wi r«
~ ~ ~ i 4~w+ti 3 ~ 2 I~' ; ~ -
- ~ ~ L_._. , z ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ -----5--------- - ~ ~ a~
(j ~ Hdwtt u~v • ~ ~ ~ sr 1 so.. . _
~ . 3 I ~ ~ ~ : , ~ e-~ nw~.~ w.
oMo. aap , I~ ~o "°°''n . ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ oe.r„a r..,. o T RECEIVED 1 'W' f~ ~+1 A
4~.q SPO KANE CO ~ , . UNTY ~ xr rw I ~
Z r.. ~ 4 ~""y 1 1.+1 21498 g f ~ I ( r ~
~ ~ ~ ~w SITE ` JDEVELOPNENT STANDARD ~ . i DpOVpStD Iout I u-n ~I ~ j ~u+es ~ i
. o~ . s ^x ~-2 QIVISIGN F ~ ~ ~R~,~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ o au~o~,~ Aua ~ir,c o ~ m - ~ a° ewiawc us{ i~a~ eu~, i s BY, _ ti W+DSCW[O ARf A I ~4~1 wa I
. I ' y~ I 11'VC 111 ~ ~ ~ '1u1' M ~ u . w W U VFRCINt 0! OPCN SpLCE I ~9x ~ C~ 5 1 y,;L, ~y~c s~te~as ~ raoNr, at~a, soc a s~o v
0 ~wro~ ww I +~ae► ~ -`4~AK"ua'3e~`F! a~ u ~ ~ "r'i~,CA'f76~S► n i a ~ m - ~r~ u ~ ~
~,►.w. ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~'N ~ I
I ! ~R-~ ~ ~w , ~ + 1 1 ~ Vw ~ i 6dq
I ~
~ ~ ~""'~'i ' ~ s~".~i~ . ~ i... Y~ ~ ~ 1' np~ pyq C.. ~w 1~ w~ r , I P1~OP~1~TY DBSCRIP T10N aM 1
I ~v ►n~wr1 Mwr ~ ` ~ B-9 oire. ua~ I 8 M~+4 ~ ~ i..~.iw.+~. Tnt ~o~l 53 I~~I ol lh~ Weel 1/1 of 1~qC1 58 Of '/ar0, Octadnq l0 Rpt r~r0ed n Ydume ~0~ of , ' ~ ~ Pia;~, Poqe 30 ~n 5pokane County, wost,ipplan,foqeiher Mi1~ Ih~ A1cet 78 leet of tna Ea~t 1/2 0l ne '0' of 1 /2 of
r a ~r , r ~ ~ r~. - - - - ~ r ~ ~ irc.t 58 of vaa, 9~,Ir s w~ W+ I fru N Nr Wl c.wr ~ c.w~ ►i.o topetner r~l~ ina IoWO•mq detcr~be4 Percel.
A ~ ~c,.,~.;; . ~ M• - fne Eaet S] feet ol t~e weet 131 leet of tNe Eaet I/7 0( Tren SB ol Yero, , ~Y ~ b ~~r-._.c__
~ rr C%CkPT IAe Natn J15 ~eel and R « V~NAY ~150 EXCEPi Ina Soulh Itl0 itel.
SITE PIAN PLAN
OFRECORD ~www 1
iaun6W IiM . . p~ ~
M qVll. FHI~NEfR$ ~ LAND SlJR1+E~'ORS K 909 ARGWIE ROAD, SPO(ME VA,, 9921~-Z789
PHUt~E (~09) 926-1322 iAX t709) 926~-t72~ ~
TB SB i 4 T25N R44 ~)l~ ~v S1~1 4 ~F F S~'C.16 , TBE , ~ . ..4 tir
SPD~fdNE CDUN7'~' IPASBINGTON ,
~ ~
~
~ l ~ ~ ~ ; CA~ ( 1 Il~ S ~i~-~-~-~ ~ U ~ , c ~ ~ G
a3. ~ y ~ ~ ~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
102b ~V Broadway Ave, Spokane, ~VA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF A►PPROVAL" TR-ZONES
T0: Spokane County Building and Planni~.g Departme~~ '
FR~M: Division of En ineerin~ & Roads ~
g ~ ~ ~ f! 1 ~ l - { ~ DATE: April 14,1999 r'"
PROJECT: UR-7 TO UR-22 MED~CAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
FZLE -ZE-0020-98/ }
Hearing Date: 04/14/99 at 9:00
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant: STACY BJORDAHL
Section Township Range: 14-25-44
Planner: STACY BJORDA.HL
TechnicallReview Date: (12/17/1998 @ 2:15)
The Spokane County Engineenng Deparbment has reviewed the above referenced application. The following
"Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the
"Findings of Fact, Conclusions and 4rder/Decision" should the request be approved.
1. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to
Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards.
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the County Engineer.
3. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
drainage and access plans.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and
approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and
arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard
engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for an~ portion of the project which is to be
occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridqe construction and
other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of
construction, unless otherwise appro~ed by the County Engineer.
CC: Applicant DWIGHT HUME (REDLIN) Engineer/Surveyor SIMPSON
Planner STACY BJORDAHL
~
Page 2 . 12/17/1998
' 0020 t
6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners
resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. -
7. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed~
right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All
work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer.
8. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Valley Way as a 70 foot
Collector Arterial. The existing one half right of way width, measured
f rom centerline, of 30 feet is not consistent with that specified in
the plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is
recommended that a strip of property 5 feet in width along the Valley
Way frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by
Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to
Valley Way.
9. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either
underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including
property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane
County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities., The applicant should check with
the applicable utilities and Spokane County Enqineer to determine
whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
10. Per the MDNS the applicant has made a voluntary contribution of
$4100.00 to the Sullivan Road/I-90 Interchange for improvements to the
loop ramp. At this time the estimated construction date is 2001.
11. Road and drainage plans for Valley Way and private road plans for
Century Lane were prepared per ZE-27-93.
l J '
t ~
~ •
~ ~
I
~ ~ ~
1 , ~ , ~ J
, ~ . ; c~ - ,
, , ,
~ ~~E ~ ~c . h ~ 4 ~
~ ~ , • ; ~ • ~ ,
' ~ ~ . • ~ - . _ ~~,a ND~-R ~ ` . ~
, ~ ` ' \ . ~ ; ~1 ,
_ ~ . ~ ` ` ~ ~ ' . ~ t:~
~ ~ ~ ~ r _ ~
i ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~
~ N ~ L`c,~c'~T-* _ u~ •
. w/ A A Y 1 1 I ~/1/
1 fl ~ r ~F
u C ~ _ ~ ~ r _ . .~L. , ~ S , ,
~ ~ . . a • 4 r~p y ~ 1 " ~ ~ K . '
~ ~ _ ' ~
K ~ . ~ 1RlC?GE ~ ~ - .
0 ~ , ~l4~~6 , ~ ' i
ti, / ~ • ' . ' ' ' o ~ ~
~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ro~ ~ y~~ ,~u F . !
~,v~. ~ ~ ~ . . ~ , , , i i r C ;
~ ~ ~ ~SP~,~•, ~Stotto~ ~
n o9rc5~~ ; W ~C oo ~ ~ ' ~ „ ~ ~
~ . . , . , r ✓ ~ 0 • . , ~ l~ .~;;~,cCt r~a ~
7`~I • ; - _ . ~ ~ ~ ..5~~ ~ ~ ,
a . ~ d . : ~ . ~
" ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ :
~ ~1` a~,i„~ w~ ~ , . . ~ ~ . ~L~,
r~ o'N ~ U1
~ z ~ > ~ ~ .
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ _ ~
r r -r ` . R ~ ~ - . r-' ~
, ~ ' 1. J ~ . R~Yr C
~~y~ S PRAG~U E x~ ~r ~ ~
, _ . . , ~ ~ 1,,..•, ~ ~ r' ~ ,1/.~~ ~ y '
J ~ ~ ' , ` ~ 1
~ ; Y ~~vf ~~E .
, ~ z N D ' c
-L ~ ' x ~ - . _ _ ~ , _ ~ ct1 ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ . ~w" ' r. ~ ~ . . , . ~ ~ i . .
Not to Scale ~2104198 N' VICINITY MAP
P~ UR-3.S ~ i P~
~ B-1 ~ ~a'itt o r_'-"--'-'-"-"'
~ ~ iwworr w. ~ - ' ~p i 0' Op'
~wN Mw ~+r sw oe.~.eM r~.4 dle~ Aib~O E.q ~ M N Mu~plq ~
~ C t iW t~~+} / i~N n..
; "C •i I ~ r~sr~a, . ~
I • w-~ ~_7 ; ' ~ ►.+..n.1w. . ~ ~ u twe.r
I ~ 2 =1- ~ ~
Z a8 1 - 0 ~ C ~ ~ .
~ ------5--------- . _ ~ _
o r . ~n ~ m r ~xr b. » o ~ 1 ~ . N 3 „ ~ ~
~ B-3 ~ Ir~N Nw 5 Onb wM~ . fa -
p •o~ 1~A • ? ~ . u.i N ( Cw'~ ~ ~
~ _ l ~ ~ . o r ~iECE( ~..w .
' SPOKA ~ i ~E CO ~ ~ UNTY . , ~ ~ ~ 4 "r'' ~ W ~
z ~ 21998 9 ~ i . , , ti ~ ~ _ r~. ~ ~ ` ~ ~ SI7E DEI/ELDPlE~(T STMmARD
~ o _ ~ ~ o u oROVOSFD Zd+c u~n : ~ , ' i a 8-1 +~s r I 4R~P14C SG~LE ~ ftT~) a y s`~ a~ ~~(j~Q~ x GF BiW~G Tn _ _ ~ , . p~ G A~D P1Ah'NiMG ~
o m a eo . ~ S 8.. ~a~on+c ust i.~a+~. ~,x~ ~ ~ » w~DSCaPm ~RE+~ ~ mw ..a I r_- ~ ~ Z 'i~I hr ~ u` LAND~~ IMV( ( T1a£ it 1 1
p • y~ ! 1 W U PERCIpT a OPQ~ SPAfE I 12t ~ C~ 5 ~uue~c x~a~c~ j~oKr. a~,w. ~c ~n.e~.,o ; 0 , , . i rwYfr i rrsasm ~ R+a~
~ vu~csrc 9~as i e~ ~ a~ ~ 1 ~ _ - ~tWCJ~:' ~ 1 IUSi I 12Sl0 S! ~ ]I i y ~.~wti 1 ~ ~i(~ ~1' I
~ : p~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ ( I ~ ~ W~ ti~w)
uA-~ ~ c-.. _ ~ I L INy r~ ~ ~~4~
1 Is 0 ~ x~ - r,y.s..~, ..,~.A ~ - ~
~ ~ r~r sn c, r.o ~ E i' g • I t DS ~ FROP~ TY D CRIP ION ►w...r w. , • ~ 6-7
oAo. w~, ~ r ~ s ~ i ~p ~ ~ ~ Tne East 5] ~eel 01 lne wat 1/2 0~ lrat 56 0! '~ra, occord~q ~o Rot reccra0 n Vdume ~0~ ~ ai~;~ p~q~ 30 m Scokone Co~,nsr ~qt~+:toqeu+a Mitn tt~ wat ~8 ieet ot ~,e Eait t/2 ot ~ ~ 'p• or ot
~r ~rcct SE oi vea: r.r... . - ----:J ~ r~wr.~o .,r... fwrtr r er wr .1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1~o I h~ ~ ~ fuo topetna .~~n n,e tab.~n9 aesc►bea Pvice~.
1 ~ rr'"" j ~ ?ne .oat S3 feet o1 tne weet t3t teet o! ~+e Ee~t I/~ of Troel S6 0~ vaa ------------------i~.~ •tiy.. ,~j b ' :kC~PT t~e l~to~t►+ 315 leet onQ
0 0 h N VA~}.H~VH~4Y ~150 E%~T tne Sautn 1e0 teec.
SITE PLAN LAN
OFRECORD ORD
►.~.~a.n ,w . ~
av~ aa~s a uno ~~roa.s K~~ r~n, s~a~ v~, 9~-z~
PI@E ~ 925-t322 f1Uf c309> 926-13Z3 •o 7'~'~ S1~1 4 OF T8~ SB 1 4 0 ^ T25N R44 Bl~~f " ~ ~~y~ ~ a
. ~ SPO,I~E COUIVTY l~AS81NGTON
~ ~
~
SEC. I4, T.2~ r,l., R,44 E.~l~~.~~. .Na,4SO8 SCALE: I~~~ 400~ ~~RPk°NG•DJ i
~ ~ ,~~•rr'~I •~ti ~r \ `
° ` i «-n~ ~ , ~~~1r~'~!'~ +I ~ / ~ ~ ~.,.C~•~'~`~t rr 7 4 . ~ i' ~ ? . . ,a .aLt~•~ ~ ~ ~ p~~~~ y/v er i 1 ~ ria.~, E To^rl'~~~~ 1 dy'~~J~~, 4.'~'4;' ~1- ' ~ G.~s~~ ' ` \1 - .('t,,. ' I' I 'P ivw 4n 4 1
M~~S~eu t'° t' gl 1~ s~ s R ` ~ _ ' J ~ . ~ ~ ♦ ~ti,, ~ ~ ~ ? • nx Q QV ~ ` r~ ,oIf ~0 , 1 I
~ y V w • n1'' v+ 1F •••,,i•, 1 I .~7 r,~~ /y ~y~,~ ~ /.a~, . t \ u ~a ~ ~~'7l1_F ~ ~ ♦ YI~Q , y~ y♦ " . ~ _ ~ ~.,1 ~ V~rTr N r~ ry~ ~ o hlJ.I w "~~'~~~~A ~ ~ \ .x~... t . I ~
'S I ~C~ ~ ~ . ~ Ol+` j z. •3 LIMITED A.CC.~ d ,q ry ~ ~ ~ t i" :'r" , . ~A y~ '6 . . m~3' N a 0~4 b ,v W ~~"'c .~'ILl. Alw 2le'lJ~ ~ ~ t9 ~ •
~ Q h I r ~ I ~ ~ ~t ~ 1 ~ ~ ~1qQ y0}~O ~I • ' ~ ~ «~`1 ~J ~ : ~ ~ • N " ~e/ ~ , R F! ' : e 13 A I r ~ ~ ,qP ~ r i~; ~ ' ' ~~i ~ a / h p N 21S ~ 12 10 ~~~a d~ ~6 • ' .P0T405`Oo.2 ~ \ e 1f Q A ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ b l : ' 9 ~u~Q y ! , ~ 'dh , ry ` ~4.• , . ~
~ r, 8 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ v"`?+ •s et • ~9 > > . r ~ ~ 1. „ A 4 ' ~ ~ , ~ i W~ Q / ~+~~t~~'~.'s+, ~ a • R ~ .w ' ` ~ ~ ~ p ~ ' • ~ ~ 6 ~ g / ~ i p I , ~'t,;, , Y n ` ^ ,4 iK ~ µ v q , ; ; fY 'l 7 ' ~ y .1 / L~~ G_c ~1 (1 ~ ' ~1 ~ ~ 0 \ ~ • ~ ~ t q . ,2 ~ y ~ ~ / ~ r %'N ~ ~a: e ~ ~ ~~.e
1 t -v « t~ ~ h~ s a 3 . ~ ~ . ~ ~ f < R~ ..t- Q 1+ ! ! I s t ~ . • e~ ~ 1 f ~ t~~2 1 ~ a ,I ~ j~ pZ ` ` -`~J ~s ' 0 i tli1, ~'~'a'~P~~~ ^ i 1 v ~ ~ y ~11 Z ~ 6~ v 4 r~~' ~ I4 S ~f'~ , e , ,^f' ll. ii~ ~ r ~rl i R ~ ~ 6 4 C , '3 N ~ ~ ~ M~ ~ j i
e Q a , 1 ~ wl ~ '~~~;ti~ q y~ 3 2~ M. ~ 2 I a t ~ ` A/ ` ' 1 ~ • ~(11 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~l~1_ ~ ~ ~cw''~1k(~~b "i ~So ~y7iS'"~ '4=: V$~S` n ~y, ►Y6 ~ il:~~lJ~a, i :t I /e •d `~~7. ~C I
^ ~ i G1 ~ ~ " r S A t ~ ~ v.v c "O I "s' _ ~ ~ i r " ~g~, '~'c -0iat;~~d~ ~ p ,y , ,f i~ is ~a ~i io s o ! p ; ~ 's ; ~ ^~k~ ~ fr ° a ~ ~ * ~ " ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'e I J ~ ` 4~ tc! _ 0 t .,r t ~S k ~ 7 C ~ Z`~ ~ ~IMIT~A /YCGEB~
~~~_r ~ ~ 2 ~ e ~ I n I I! ,o / a l I RI~, FILfl iJO. IZ01-M . , ~ :r ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ^'9+~JTP ~ ~ j 2 I ~ ~ r ~t~ i 3 a 6 7 ii ~ y~ ~ .A ~ , ~ , ' x•~ , ~ ~ ` ~ / ~ , ; ^ h
i ~ ~ ' '~L. i4 13 12 il~ 10 9 a ~ tl A ti~ i~ ;f J~ t J 1 r a O W ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ c s ~ , Pi , ~ ~y ~ ''~~n . ~7 ~ rc b "r ~ ° I: ~ ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ' ~ 1 Y.~~ ` , ~ ~ ~ K ° ~r~ ~ K e ~ s °b ~ j0 . ~ , r
~ ~~K', " p G'~ r yii"/ t✓ N, n•' tl,, f~ 4 4 T r Q~ ~ ,L,~ t.~~i W^'~ r~~ r/ S11 Z~ ~ a 4 ~ II A ♦ 4 7~ 01 , ~ ~ H ~ f Q a/ d R !0 • i( 2; 0 ~ ~ b~ ~ ~ , a ~ ~ ` ~y ~ ( ` ' . A ~ ! /l A ~ M 6 i ~M I
~ t ~ r T' ~z ~ N n.f:•Z p.rJ-+i ~ P f Q ~ ~S~ 61~' C ~1 i.~ I ~ f~ f. J~` 7 a!Q 6~~ \ ~ V i I' " ~ i ~ S i' Ri i~F t~.1. ~ 2 ~e 1~1 a 'l;~ 11 ! `f : ~ ~ ~ ~ ' u~y ~,iar-- ~ e e v~" r 13 i5 : 1; ~ ,~o
w,q~„Q. ' r~i~ o~ o ; ~Z ~ O ~ ~ 1 0~ ` ° e~ I ~~1 ~ ~ 3~ ~ s na 4 4. ~ ♦ 3 i i L e ' 6 u n rt a= n~ i 4 4 ~i! O/7 's ~ 'y ~~tiJf~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r i ~ ¢ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ dr~ ~ ,~~'0 ~ , ~ N, A ~ ~ ~ Z 9: ~ 11~i ^ ~ ~ m 0 i~ ~ • . ~
~ ~ ~ ~5~~ ~r~ , • . e • b ~.ew ~ ,4odGn ~ ~ t~ tt t~ ~t r► ,r 1 ~,,'~.'7r rv~t ~M . ` , ` R f ~ ae~,_ _ ~ ~Ilf,,, ~ ~ ~ ~ y' c~l~ ~r~~;~ ,t~..1' ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ } ~ icl? 1 ~ ~ ~l ~ C ~ ~ 'l+~~'f ti ~ • ^,4 a l~ n~ "~r
+►A~ 1 • o ~ , 'a 'z r t t ~~f (~j u ~ v ~ ;A ti i I i 1 ~ .~.r_~ ` ~ I • i~ f ~,qi~ ~t - n ~r { ~ ( ' I ~ ~ ' 11 ~ ~~J ~ ~ 1 ~ z d ~ x~L~ i A /I . ~i S• G IE ~~p^ r i
~ p ~t _ g ci ,fo ✓i • u ~ ~ I s~ L, N ~ i I{ ~ GW ~ r ~ ~Q a 91 'dt ,Q:" I ! 2 ` I i ~ ~li~~' : n ~ ~Q1, OQ~ ~ tw: °°a . ~I ,+~~:Y~:~ i;., ~ ~ r~17 AL A V~ 17 - i r ~ f;e~' i
. ~ ~ 3~? . f a^n' Ei~ l~ , ~ n ~ ' ! ~ A. G.~ , y ~ ~ ~ ~ t r ,z y 9~ ~yr ~S;l)~ ^ i ~ p~f I J ~ q n ~u 3 . e UF u
` / ? „ $ ~ 4i ~ , I :d ~v , ' ~ i N / •1 Q: ~j1A ~ 2 .ii ~ 7 r 1 A l4~ Q ~ ~ , ~ , ~ E ~ ~ S „ riiiii~ ~ ~ d ~ MI ~ ~ ~ z p c~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ Ua
2; ~ ar ` •.e ~ ~ c~ ,t' ~ ~e ~ ro ~ sa ~ ~s~ ~ ~ `7" sc r• ~ ~u 3~ I , ~ ` ~ i` ~ I`I ~~n s t~ GI a I 1.A ~ M
. ~ .ri '~~f~ "A ~ ~ ^ ~ 17 t ti1~~ 1i,/rnt... ~r i ~l (y' ~.iiiii.. A ~IS ' v/~LI,E.Y ~WA~'~ So h w4r ~ ~ Q, p j ~ ~
~ ~ . i~r~~ 1 ,~..lrrr' No a~c~-oo~ i:t;;'~~~ a`` i pp` d . t f a rwur rLw~~' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ a~' ~ ,s ' ~ "~1 ~i ~VAL !~Y i Wl~~ y~ ~ ~ ~,..yit.wnv, ' +i • ~a ~ .'r'"fi'° t 8• dVl6~L=, < ~A 2 ~ ~u~ M..12oi-4o' o~t ~ai2oi I ~ Not201 - pu~ ' ~ u
(i~ • ii n w~ ~ ~~r i~ I" ~ f 1 'A" ~ j 7 ' N~ 0 o eR r~ e r~ ~ ~ ~~y~ ~ .~.',z " ~ ~ N ` ~ ~ R • ' • , v ~ ~ g ~ff• i N~ ~ a • o(~~~ ~ o o ~ n' ~
~ ~ ''1 w ~ ~ ! 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ L o i,3a ~ p S! ~ ~ ~ dB 7; . N c~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ } e~+° ' Z r oc ~ 4 ~ ; I
Y , ~ 1 r~ ~p ~f~~ 7° ~ ~ ~S 1 4 o. ~ ~ f N ~ . , r.! B ~t~ • a~ i i j Ol D ~ , ~ N N Z . Z 7~ " a ♦ 7 e I V ~ i'~ ~ ~+wirv J ' ' ' C° I ~ N ~ 2+ ~I Av • ,yittf0 M A N ~ ' t1~~ ' t , . ^ ~--~.~.'a
µ ~ u ~ < ~ `o . ° ~ ! .X 31~ a~ t~p " n ~Nw+~.vo. , n W v a ~1 , ~l ~ , ~ f 6 ~ A _f & J R~h:~p t~ 1 ~ 0 ~ I~ O ~ ~ ! g~~ r I fil Ol. f1`~~ p n 1 ~ tl
~ ~ C + j ~ a b'~s An~ T'I fr'i~i ~~~~a~tef~e ~j' i i ~ • ~ a ~ Q i ri 2e:~ ~ ~ e ~ n= ~ a. E t, c k > c! cs. n~ a d u E ~ . c , d = '4 ~ , S n~ ~ ► U~~° u ~ ~tv r~ ~ ~ ~0~, Q M 4 . in~ Qii ~ ~ej Jet ~
~ ~,d~` 1 a_ ~ I ^ e i~ ~ ~ 4 ~ • ~7~~fi=t~ ~ F J y Q a Q ~ ~ 1 Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I/ C~, , ~ a '~L_ lv~~ ~ ~ / J~ I. 't ~ ~ ~~2~~~~ S ~4 ~1 : ' '~i ~ 15 ~ M ` a ~ ~ t • , ~ . ~ <<,t, :;,,.';j Se.~~.6 00~0~9I~ ~ 1 ~~1
- -----------r~APP~.E ' ---~7"5i1~o9L~ . --_.•--i~ _ f "'[~i^1~.•. ~ '~~j' ' 7l'~SS"~""'•• ~ ss~~. r~ .~COKANC ~ j COUNTY R OAD~N°_ 2312 • 1~~ ~ 24 'f + I r 4~ o c~ , i
~q AVENUE ~ ~ ~~`~p ~ r 9PRAGUE c R P t S/~ ~ Y' e 7 L ~ Y ~e ~ A livor V V uro 0 ~ ~qVI1R0 m ~i p~~w~a Oaa.rep ~an vn~ N C Q~ OX S M~b * Qp ~ n+e ~,'1/w uw`e o► ~so'c.~••~~, A ~ c ~ ^ ee.y. p q~e~rR I~r ww.on+ t 0
p N aS ~4 ♦ ND 60N~wR /N bOf~~RT/~~V ~ ,~Z~ n . p (sea e~rc.~ "'.w~ ~..ar.) ^ . . ~ I ~.1' ' ~ y e Y-~Ia. ' s p~ •M~ , ~ ~
~or.RooAi1'c <ornrr ~~EStR/PT~oN ~ ~e I '
W t t O l C~r F. r I.S~ ~ ~ ~t G•rn,v /Sc~p~p~~ ~}Uw~,i~ )r)ri: ' w ecR. ~f ee rew .7Mt~+e~ M.r,19oY ~ zM c ae ~ % „ w r - t - - . - - - . 4riaM ia . . f , . . . . . . ~
ia /L'/7 Ill' e.v~.Jtpf• r~ /P~f.. ~ •n' xL?'1?..+~.4.+~~9s~L:x.,.A..~P,~p..~i~i irrxn°Nsa [a;.*Y PfCy~~ .~u~Rr.QT~ ~ ~ i / B /L' ~n . r • ¢,JCjr , i i ~ . . . - - • - o ar a y n . . . - • ~
{u ~0~9 IL~ b r • - - . irr A,Qo,l~~yny a•rR a~wt ii.• ,f/»•«~ h~rR (~oY1~' N~~r NE „ Pa,~f' rtost/~ ~ron/ i~d~' ~ ~ _ . N h' n Pi~~t 40' /Y~t2•E /'~qf J 4' N.iK'!r 7~s P~~R ao" JB4'M~ To'
, „ FY . . ~er!!f Inea~d owd eih ~ TN/s SCGTICN l~BpRDOUCE~ l',^.bM ~JN6N TO MYLA,Q G.ROy 6/I3/1I~
~ NOTG •
~S JNAOCO 4Q~4 D~S/6NATB$ ~~/AC47fON~~
r
~aC~e~: ~5~ 44.1 ~ 3~
awner: ~~D~IN, P~IUL ~
_ I ~ ~ , { ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ ~
Co~wner: - ~ - - _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ow~~~ Address , ~ ' ~ E _ , _ PO ~~lC . 244 VERADAL~ INA 99037 D244 f
- ~ ~ I I
~ ~ S~te Addr~~s - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~
- - I ^ ' ' 4~ 2 N CENTURY LN V~R ~ I I ~ , ~ `
~ ' ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ I D cri tion ~ Le ~ es ~ p ~ -
~ VERA ~~~FT OF 1N~12 ~ IN42FT DF ~~~2 B~~ EX~ CD RD I~ ~
_ _ _ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ! -
_ _ ~
_ i ~ I
- ~ ~ ~
j I ; _ - - ~ ~ •
_ ~ . ~
J- ~ ~ ~ - - - T _ ~ _ ~
~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ,
~ - ' _ ~ - ~
, - ~ - I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , ~ i
~ w ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - , ~ I ~ ~ , ~ I
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ ~ _ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~
~ ~
, i i i ~ ~ I
I~o#ic~: This is ~ot a~e ai dacument, D~~a ict~d ~n this ma is eneral 8~ s~~'e~t #o cor~star~t revisian. It is intende~ f~r reference ~~nce
9 ~ ~ ~ ~ use onl Le al docum~nts s~~ul~ be abtained fram the ~ ro ri~~e ~ enc . Y ~ p 9 Y
4
t
4
T. ~3 ' :1., r
p
9 ~ , ' r ~ ~ , ,I
r Y
e jW'
e.. ~:n L+
n., 1 n..
i 'i3.
~ t ti. y< ,.o.
~A
t ~ ,p
&t ~ p
> 6
~ r•. ~ ~g.
.r t - f yc
n
d P ~ ~ n,~; is r
y p N e t....e. •t.. S ~t b.. < ~ q , . . .
gyp. ~ ~
w ~T ~ w
~ ~ w d ~ ~ a . a- ,4
e ,r.. .we„: - 'aa A , rev r
;d
i
. -
~ ~
~ ~
a:
I
r
i
i
F
J
i.-..
f1
a
i i
I
y, ,
I wr ,
4 i t1~`
~i
i i i I
E
i
~i
3
~ .
I
i
I ~ 5 f } i '
i i E 4 f
I
~ ~
8 n
f ~
I F(r k
P°"..-
G
~ i i
} i
£ 1 { {
P 3
t j ~ i
i
pp i
E ~ u„ _ i. g~p~+,
t~. L t 3
i
~ I ~ 1 t ~ t ~ t I j ~ i i ~ I I
I 1 i i # p~ A ~ tt[...j w, ~ ~
~ s x ~ _ ~ i ~ ~
4 ' t
E Iii
Y ~ ~ t 7.
k1
I i
x \ V ,
1
i
I
i.a:'
1
4
t
4
T. ~3 ' :1., r
p
9 ~ , ' r ~ ~ , ,I
r Y
e jW'
e.. ~:n L+
n., 1 n..
i 'i3.
~ t ti. y< ,.o.
~A
t ~ ,p
&t ~ p
> 6
~ r•. ~ ~g.
.r t - f yc
n
d P ~ ~ n,~; is r
y p N e t....e. •t.. S ~t b.. < ~ q , . . .
gyp. ~ ~
w ~T ~ w
~ ~ w d ~ ~ a . a- ,4
e ,r.. .we„: - 'aa A , rev r
;d
i
. -
~ ~
~ ~
a:
I
r
i
i
F
J
i.-..
f1
a
i i
I
y, ,
I wr ,
4 i t1~`
~i
i i i I
E
i
~i
3
~ .
I
i
I ~ 5 f } i '
i i E 4 f
I
~ ~
8 n
f ~
I F(r k
P°"..-
G
~ i i
} i
£ 1 { {
P 3
t j ~ i
i
pp i
E ~ u„ _ i. g~p~+,
t~. L t 3
i
~ I ~ 1 t ~ t ~ t I j ~ i i ~ I I
I 1 i i # p~ A ~ tt[...j w, ~ ~
~ s x ~ _ ~ i ~ ~
4 ' t
E Iii
Y ~ ~ t 7.
k1
I i
x \ V ,
1
i
I
i.a:'
1