ZE-23-01
r ,
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex;AMINER
RE: Zone Reclassification from the UR-3.5 ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Zone to the UR-22 Zone; ) CONCLUSIUNS OF LAW,
Applicant: Ray Veley ) AND DECISION
File No. ZE-23-01 )
This matter coming on for public hearing on February 6, 2002, the Hearing Examiner, a#~er
review of the zone reclassi~ication application and the entire record, and finding good cause
therefore, hereby mal~es the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
~ 1. The application requests a rezone of 3.39 acres of land from the ~7rban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) zone to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, for the development of rofessional
p offices.
2. The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Evergreen Road and Valley
Way Avenue, in the SW'/a of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
3. The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel no. 45143.15b2. The
subj ect property is legally described as Tracts A and B of Short Plat No. SP-1251-00, recorded
on July 17, 2001, in Book 17, Page 66 of Short Plats, Spokane County Auditor.
4. The applicant is Raymond C. Veley, 20215 North Spotted Road, Deer Park, WA 99006.
The site owner is the Estate of Frieda A. Thornberg, c/o Raymond C. Veley, 20215 North
Spotted Road, Deer Park, ~VA 9900b.
5. The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearing Examiner
Ordinance (County Resolution No. 96-0171} and the County Hearing Examiner Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No. 96-0294).
6. The requirements for notice of public hearing were met.
7. The Hearing Examiner conducted site visits on February 5, 2002 and March 3, 2002.
S. A public hearing was held on the proposed rezone on February 6, 2002.
9. The following persons testified at the public hearing:
Tammy Jones Scott Engelhard
Division of Planning Division of Engineering
1026 VVest Broadway 102b ~Uest Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane, WA 99260-0240
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 1
. ~ '
Mike Silvey Richard Hughes
10221 East Montgomery 13916 East Valleyway
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99216
Mark McManus Linda Lafser
14522 East Valleyway 14010 East Alki Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99216
Roy McManus Lorie Hughes
14623 East Valleyway 13916 East ~alleyway Spokane, ~VA 99216 Spokane, WA 99216
Lisa ~Villms
511 North B annen
Spokane, ~VA 99216
10. The County Division of Planning issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the project
~ on January 18, 2002. ~
11. The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, GMA
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan, GMA Comprehensive Plan map, Phase I
development regulations, County Resolution Nos.1-1033 and 2-0037, County Arterial Road
Plan maps, County official zoning maps, County Zoning Code, County Code, other applicable
development regulations, and prior land use decisions in the vicinity.
12. The record includes the documents in the proj ect file at the time of the public hearing, the
documents and testimony submitted at the public hearing, and the items taken notice of by the
Hearing Examiner.
13. The site is approximately 3.39 acres in size and rectangular in shape. The property is
relatively flat in topography, with a moderate rise in topography from south to north. The
northwest portion of the site is improved with a single-family residence, detached garage and two
sheds. On July 17, 2001, a final short plat was filed to divide the site from north to south into
~ two lots, for the development of single-family homes.
14. The site plan of record for the proposal illustrates the development of 26,700 square feet of
professional office space, contained in six (6) buildings ranging in size from 3,500 square feet to
5,600 square feet, and associated paxking. The existing house and accessory structures on the
site would be remaved. A six (6)-foot high, sight-obscuring fence, and Type I(sight-obscuring)
landscaping are illustrated along the north and east borders. An enclosed dumpster is illustrated
along the northerly border of the east half of the subject property. Access to the proposal is
illustrated along Evergreen Road, and to Valley Way Avenue at a point located 30-35 feet from
the west boundary of the east half of the site.
15. The site plan of record submitted on November 26, 2001 indicates a maximum building
height of 35 feet. At the public hearing, the applicant's representative testified that the buildings
would all be single-story and could be constructed at a maximum height of 25 feet.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-O1 Page 2
t ,
16. Effective January 1,1991, the zoning of the site was reclassified from the A'cultural ~
Suburban zone of the now expired County Zoning Ordinance to the Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) zone, under the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The site is also located in the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area
designated by the Zoning Code.
17. The current rezone application, environmental checklist, site plan of record and application
fees were submitted on November 26, 2001. The application is subj ect to the land use processing
requirements in County Resolution No. l-0700. The County Division of Planning issued a
determination of completeness for the rezone application on November 30, 2001. The
completeness date for the application ~is November 26, 2001.
18. On November 5, 2001, pursuant to the State Growth Management Act (GMA), the County
adopted a new Comprehensive Plan ("GMA Comprehensive Plan"}, Urban Growth Area (UGA)
boundaries and a Capital Facilities Plan. See County Resolution No.1-1059. On January 15,
2002, the County implemented the GMA Comprehensive Plan, UGA and Capital Facilities Plan;
and adopted Phase I development regulations ("Phase I regulations") to implement such plans.
T'he County also repealed ~the interim development regulations and interim urban growth area ~
(IUGA) boundaries previously adopted by the County under the State Growth Management Act.
See County Resolution No. 2-0037.
19. The site and surrounding land are designated in the County's UGA boundaries. Prior to
. January 15, 2002, the site and such surrounding land were designated inside the County's IUGA
boundaries. ~ ~
20. The Phase I regulations allow rezone applications that were complete before the adoption
of such regulations on January 15, 2002, pertain to land located within the UGA and are
"inconsistent" with the GMA Comprehensive Plan to be processed under the comprehensive plan
and land use regulations in effect when the application became complete. If the rezone
application is approved, the new zoning is effective for a period of one (1) year, and development
of the property may proceed under the conditio~s of the rezone provided a building permit is
submitted within the 1-year period. After the 1-year period, the zoning of the property would
"cross over" to the zone designated in the crossover ma~rix of the Phase I regulations, If a
building permit is applied for during the 1-year period, the conditions of the ~rior rezone
continue to apply; provided, if there is a conflict between the conditions and the development
standards of the crossover zone, the more restrictive standard applies.
21. The GMA. Comprehensive Plan designates the site, and the land ~ying north, south and east
of the site, in the Low Density Residential category. Under the Phase I regulations, the crossover
zone for all land in the Low Density Residential category that was zoned UR-3.5 prior to January
15, 2002 is the UR-3.5 zone, Accordingly, if the cur~rent rezone application had not been
submitted, or if the Examiner denies the applicat~on, the site would be zoned UR-3.5 pursuant to
the Phase I regulations.
22. The proposed zoning for the site, UR-22, is incons~stent with the crossover zone (UR-3.5}
for the site under the Phase I regulations. Accordingly, if the current rezone app~ication is
approved, development of the site would be subj ect to the development standards of the UR-22
zone and the conditions of approval for the rezone, as long as a building permit is submitted
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 3
t ~
within one (1) year. After the 1-year period expires, whether or not a building permit is timely
applied for, the zoning of the site would "crossover" to the UR-3.5 zone. If a building permit is
applied for within the 1-year period, any conditions of approval imposed under the current rezone
to the UR-22 zone would continue to apply to the site upon its crossover to the UR-3.5 zone. See
Resolution No. 2-0037, Phase I regulations.
23. The Phase I regulations require any rezone applications submitted under the GMA
Comprehensive Plan and Phase I regulations to be consistent with the GMA Comprehensive Plan
category for the property, and with the implementing zone set forth in the Phase I regulations for
such category. The implementing zone for the Low Density Residential category of the GMA
Comprehensive Plan is either the UR-3.5 zone or the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone;
provided, if the UR-7 zone is used the density of new development may not exceed a residential
(net) density of six (b) dwelling units per acre. Accordingly, any future rezone applications submitted for the site under the Phase I regulations would be limited to a rezone to either the
UR-3.5 zone or the UR-7 zone. ~
24. The GMA Comprehensive Plan designates the land lying along the west side of Evergreen
Road in the area east of the site, to a depth of 300 feet, in the Mixed Use category of the GMA ~
Comprehensive Plan. The Mixed Use category continues to the north and south along the west
side of Evergreen Road at varying distances. The crossover zone for such category under the
Phase I regulations is the zoning of the land prior to adoption of the Phase I regulations on
January 15, 2002. The implementing zones for the Mixed Use category are the Urban
Residential-12 (UR-12}, UR-22, Neighborhood Business (B-1), Community Business (B-2)
zone, and Industrial Park (I-1 } zone.
25. Within the UGA, the Phase I regulations authorize existing commercial and industrial
zones to be utilized for development until January 15, 2003, notwithstanding the other
transitional provisions in the Phase I regulations. ~
26. The Examiner must consider the current rezone application under the comprehensive plan
and development regulations in effect on November 26, 2001, the date when the application
became complete. This includes the old Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), County
Zoning Code, County Road Standards, Critical Areas Ordinance, interim development
regulations for land located inside the County's IUGA boundaries, and other development
regulations in effect on November 26, 2001.
27. The County Zoning Code was amended in 1998 to increase the maximum residential
densit~ (net) allowed in the UR-3.5 zone from 3.5 dwelling units per acre to 4.35 dwelling units
per acre. See County Resolution No. 98-0482.
28. The land lying north, south and east of the site is zoned UR-3.5 and is primarily developed
with single-family homes at urban densities. In 1996, a final short plat was recorded to divide
approximately one (1) acre of land ~ying directly north of the easterly third (1/3) of the site into
two {2} lots for single-family homes. See Short Plat No. SP-1034-95, recorded on 2-6-96.
Single-family homes have been constructed on such land. In August of 2000, a preliminary short
plat was approved to divide approximately 2.5 acres of land lying directly north of the westerly
two-thirds {2/3) of the site into four (4) lots for an existing residence and three (3 additional }
home sites. See decision dated 8-1-2000 in File No. SP-1243-00.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 4
29. The land lying westerly of the site across Evergreen Road, is across is zoned UR-3.5 and
primarily developed with single-family homes, but includes some duplexes, a church and a new
business office for a water district adja~cent to the west side of Evergreen Road. Some UR-7
zoning is found further to the southwest.
30. Some existing residences along Evergreen Road in the area have recently been removed or
vacated due to the recent widening of Evergreen Road andlor in contemplation of redevelopment.
31. On September 26, 2000, two (2) acres of land located along the west side of Evergreen
Road, approximately .3 miles north of the site, was rezoned from the UR-3.5 zone to the UR.-22
zone for the development of 32,000 square feet of professional offices. The office building was
limited to two stories and a building height of 35 feet, and has been fully developed. See
Hearing Examiner decision in File No. ZE-10-99. The applicant for such project (Mike Silvey)
represented the applicant at the public hearing on the current proj ect.
32. The land lying along the south side of Sprague Avenue in the vicinity, to a depth of
approximately 200 feet, is designated in the Regional Commercial category of the GMA
Comprehensive Plan and zoned Regional Business (B-3) or Community Business (B-2). The
crossover zoning for the Regional Commercial category is the zoning of the land prior to January
15, 2002, and the implementing zone for such category is the Regional Business (B-3) zone.
33. On September 8, 2000, two (2) acres of land located approximately 900 feet south of the
site, along the east side of Evergreen Road, was rezoned from the UR-22 zone to the B-3 zone.
This was to allow development of a building with 8,100 square feet of retail space and 9,000
square feet of inedical office use, at a maximum building height of 35 feet. See Hearing
Examiner decision in File No. ZE• 12-00.
34. The County Arterial Road Plan, in both the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA.
Comprehensive Plan, designate Evergreen Road, Sprague Avenue and Broadway Avenue in the
area as Principal Arterials. The Arterial Road Plan in the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA
Comprehensive Plan, respectively designate Valley Way Avenue as a Collector Arterial and an
Urban Collector Arterial. Valley V~ay Avenue, west of Evergreen Road, is located
approximately 80 feet south of Valley Way Avenue, east of Evergreen Road.
35. Sprague Avenue comprises a major traffic and commercial corridor through the Spokane
Valley area of Spokane County, The County recently improved Evergreen Road, north of
Sprague Avenue, from a 2-lane road without curb or sidewalk to a S-lane Principal Arterial Road
Sect~on, with curb and sidewalk along both sides of the street. A new freeway interchange was
also constructed at Interstate 90 and Evergreen Road, located approximately 1.3 miles north of
the subj ect property. The Spokane Valley mall and associated retail development is located
along the south side of Interstate 90, between Ever~reen Road and Sullivan Road.
36. Valle~ Way Avenue, east of Evergreen Road, consists of a paved road without curb or
sidewalk. The right of way for such road is 50 feet wide adjacent to the site, narrows to 40 feet
east of the site at Bannen Road, then widens back further to the east.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-O1 Page 5
~ G
37. The project would be served by a high level of urban services and facilities; including
public sewer and water, and modern utilities. This implements the policies of the Urban
category, as well a~ the purpose and intent statement of the UR-22 zone, regarding urban
development. Public sewer availability is required for new development located within the
County's IUGA boundaries. County Resolution No. 97-08d4.
38. The site meets the definition of "fill-in" development in the Urban category, since it is
located between and in close proximity to at least two developed geographic areas having
densities and land uses conforming to the land use categories of the Comprehensive Plan
designated for such areas, and also because the development will aid in the cost-effectiveness of
utilities and public facilities and services. See Comprehensive Plan, glossary and Decision .
uideline l,l.a.
39. The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that neighborhood commercial uses be located along the heavily traveled streets. The purpose and intent statement
for the UR-22 zone, in pertinent part, indicates that the UR-22 zone is usually located adj acent to
"major or secondary arterials", and that offices are permitted to provide some of the service ~
needs generated by high-intensity uses. "Maj or" and "secondary" arterials correspond to
"Prinncipal" arterials and "Minor" arterials, under the County Zoning Code, and do not include
"Collector" arterials. See Zoning Code 14.300.100, definitions.
40. The proposed offices can provide some of the service needs generated by the high-intensity
commercial uses located along Sprague Avenue to the south. Office uses tend to have lower
~ traffic impacts and more limited hours of operation than other commercial uses, or multi-family
developments, of comparable size.
41. Neighboring residents objected to the proposal expressi~g concern over impacts relating to
property values, exterior lighting, noise, increased traffic and traffic safety along Valley Way
Avenue, increased crime, building heights, wildlife, incompatibility of commercial development
in a residential neighborhood, and other concerns.
42. County Critical Areas maps do not designate any critical areas, such as priority wildlife
habitat, on the site. No evidence was submitted that any threatened or endangered species
inhabit or depend on the site for survival.
43. No evidence of a traffic engineering nature was submitted to indicate that traffic from the
proposal would have any significant adverse impact on traffic capacity or safety along the roads
serving the proposal.
44. "Buffering" is a technique of separating potentially incompatible land uses by distance,
changing density, landscaping, screening andlor physical features or structures. See
Comprehensive Plan, glossary and Decision Guidelines 1.5.1,1.5.2 and b.1.1. The Urban
category recommends that height and architectural design be considered in evaluating the impact
of n.ew structures on a neighborhood.
45. The maximum building height in the UR-3.5 zone is 35 feet, and is 50 feet in the UR-22
zone.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 6
1 1
46. The site has frontage along Evergreen Road of approximately 246 feet, and frontage along
Valley Way Avenue of approximately 641 feet. This extension to the east is more than twice as
far as the Mixed Use category extends along the west side of Evergreen Road under the GMA
Comprehensive Plan, and penetrates deeper into residential neighborhoods than other UR-22
~ zones and commercial zoning along Evergreen Road to the north and south. The easterly half of
the site also has primary access along Valley Way Avenue, a Collector Arterial, at a point
directly opposite single-family homes zoned UR-3.5.
47. The proposal would place commercial buildings and associated parking lots within 20 feet
of the single-family residential lots lying directly north and east of the subject property, zoned
UR-3.5. The landscaping and sight-obscuring screening required by the UR-22 zone along the
east and north property line of the site, the reduced building heights and the aesthetically
designed and landscaped buildings proposed by the applicant do not provide a sufficient buffer
for adj acent and nea.rby single-family homes.
48. Enhanced buffering is necessary to mitigate the impact of the proposed office development on the single-family residential neighborhood located near or adj acent to the site.
49. The rezone should be denied for the east half of the subject property. Access should also be
limited to Evergreen Road.
50. The rezone should be approved for the west half (Tract "A") of the site, which is 1.69 acres
in size. A maximum building height of 35 feet and two (2) stories should be imposed on
development of the west half of the site, whichever is less. The buildings should be setback from
the south property line to lessen the height impact of the office building (s) constructed on the
west half of the site.
51. The amount of professional office space proposed by the applicant, (26,700 square feet),
divided by the acreage of Tract "A" (1.39 acres), is approximately 15,800 square feet per acre.
This compares favorably to the 16,000 square feet of office space per acre authorized for the UR-
22 zone approved ~n Fi~e No. ZE-10-99.
52. The rezone approved for the west half of the site is subject to the landscaping and screening
requirements of the UR-22 zone, adj acent to UR-3.5 zoning, as set forth above.
53, The County Zoning Code restricts exterior illumination from illuminating directly any
building or structure on an adj acent lot containing a residence or building.
54, The project, as modified, has been conditioned for compliance with the development
standards of the UR-22 zone and other applicable provisions of the County Zoning Code, and the
recommendations of the commenting public agencies. As conditioned, the project will be
reasonably compatible with, and not have a significant negative impact on, neighboring land
uses. The proj ect, as conditioned, generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.
55. No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the County Division of Planning. The proposal, as modified, will not have more
than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment, and the Examiner concurs with
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 7
i ►
issuance of the DNS. The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chapter 11.10 of
the Spokane Coun~y Code have been met.
56. Changed conditions have occurred since the zoning of the site was re-designated to the
UR-3.5 zone on January 1,1991, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County
Zoning Code. This includes the availability of public sewer in the area, recent road
improvements to Evergreen Road and its interchange with I-90, recent rezones to the UR-22
along Evergreen Road to the northwest, increased residential~ growth in the area, and increased
traffic in the area.
57. The site plan does not illustrate required landscaping along the west and south boundaries
of the site. The rezone will be required to provide landscaping and screening as required by the
Zoning Code.
Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ~
1. The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, generally conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, bears a substantial relationship, and will not be detrimental, to the public health, safety or welfare.
3. A change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant the
proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned. A substantial change of circumstances has
occurred in the area since the site was last zoned.
4. The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local
Environmental Ordinance have been met. The proposal, as conditioned and modified, will not
have a significant, probable adverse impact on the environment.
5. The proposed rezone, as modified and conditioned, meets the criteria established by
Washington case law for approving a rezone, and the criteria established in paxagraphs
14.402.020 (1 }(2) of the County Zoning Code for amending the County of~.cial zoning map.
b. Approval of the land use application is appropriate under section 11 of the Count~ Hearing
Examiner Qrdinance, adopted by County Resolution No. 96-0171.
III. DECISION
Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a rezone
to the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is hereby approved for Tract "A" of Short Plat No.
SP-1215-00, subj ect to the conditions of approvai of the public agencies stated below, and is
hereby denied for Tract "B" of Short Plat No. SP-1215-00.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 8
.Any conditions of such agencies that have been added or significantly revised by the
Hearing Examiner are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner, This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISI01~ OF PLANNING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant,"
which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies to the following real property: Tract "A" of Short Plat No. SP-
1251-00, recorded on July 17, 2001, in Book 17, Page 66 of Short Plats, Spokane County
Auditor. .
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, the Aquifer
Sensitive Area (ASA) ~verlay zone and other applicable provisions of the Spokane County
Zoning Code, as amended.
4. Any change of conditions application submitted for the site shall comply with Section
14.504.040 of the County Zoning Code, as amended. All variations must conform to regulations
set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans
shall be maintained. ~
5. Development of the site is litnited to no more than 26, 700 square feet of professional
offices, including but not limited to medical o~ces.
6. All buildings shall be set back at least 70 feet from the south p~operty line of the subject
property.
7. Buildings shall be limited to a maxi~num height of 35 feet or two (2) stories, whichever
standard pYovides a lesse~ building height. "Story" and "building height" shall be as def ned in
Section 14.300.100 of the County Zoning Code, as amended.
8. Vehicular access shall be restricted to ~vergreen Road.
9. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planningldesignee of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permit.
10. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
11. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond
or other suitable guarantee for the proj ect prior to release of any building permits. Landscaping
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-O1 Page 9
< <
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
12. Pursuant to Section I of the Phase I Development Regulations adopted on January 15, 2002,
(County Resolution No. 2-0077), the zone reclassification shall be effective for a period of one
(1) year from February 15, 2002. Building Permits must be applied for during the one (1)-year
period, in order to develop the subject property under the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone,
subject to the conditions of approval imposed herein.
13, At the end of the one (1) year-period stated above, the zoning of the site will be reclassified
to the applicable crossover zone for the site under the Phase I Development Regulations, as
amended. The conditions of approval imposed herein shall continue to apply to any development
of the site conducted pursuant to a complete building peYmit application submitted within the one
(1) year period.
14. The Division of Plar~ning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, noting that the property in question is subject to, a variety of speciai conditions imposed
as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
"The parcel of property legally described as Tract "A" of Short Plat No. SP-1251-00,
recorded on July 17, 2001, in Book 17, Page 66 of Short Plats, Spokane County Auditor is the
subj ect of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on March 4, 2002,
imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. ZE-23-O1 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning."
SP4KANE CUUNTY BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1. The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized
by the state Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type,
occupancy classification, existing exte~or wall protection and energy code requirements.
SPOKANE DIVISIUN UF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed;
l. Access perm~ts for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2. A Professional Engineer (P.E.), licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit road and
storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of the
Spokane Count~ Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stormwater
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-01 Page 10
a ~ .
~
Management, and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws that are in effect at
the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s). The final
road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the Count~ Engineer's acceptance
prior to release of any Grading, Building, or Right-of Way Permit.
3. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
4. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
5. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Roadway Section for the irnprovement of
Valley ~Vay Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the
addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development.
. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. ~ ~
6. ,All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements axe found in
Spokane County Resolution No. l-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subj ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be
completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the
. County Engineer.
10. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work.
11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adj acent to Spokane County Right of
UVay per Spokane County Standards.
12. This proposed zone change has been reviewed according to the site plan of record, Any
modifications in this site plan of record shall require additional review by the County Engineer.
At such time a revised site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-O1 Page I 1
1 ~
information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the
development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation
maybe required for off site improvements.
13. Vehicular access to the site is restricted to Evergreen Road.
SPUKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. ~ater service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane}, State Department of Health.
4. A ublic sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be p . , .
rovided to each tract prior to sale. The use of i.ndiv~dual on-site sewage disposal systems shall p
not be authorized.
5. When the current residence is removed, the on-site sewage disposal system must be
ro erl abandoned per Spokane Regional Health District's Rules and Regulations for On-Site p p Y
Sewage Disposal Systems for Spokane County.
6. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE CUUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed.
2. A sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall subm.it historical
andlor estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish
sewer fees.
3. The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under
se arate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public p .
sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall
submit historical and/or estimated water usage as par~ of the sewer plan submittal.
4. Sewer lans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance p
of the sewer connection permit.
5. An water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Y
V~ater System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
HE Find~ngs, Conclusions and Decision ZE-23-41 Page 12
~ 1 ; " r
V V
l. Al1 a,pp~icab~e air pollutio~ ~o~tr~~ r~~ula~~o~~ sha~~ be met. ~~e me~aa ~ated D~cernb~r
7, ~~01 from ~~A~~A ~o ~h~ ~iv~~ian afP~ann~n.~ in Planning ~i~e No, ~E-Z3-~~.
~A~'~D thi~ da~ of ~~c~, Z~~2
~~~K~.NE ~~~JNT"~' ~IEA~IN~~ E~AM~I~~~
~
Mic a~l De~ap~~y, ~~'~A #5~35
~~T~~~ ~F FI~AL ~~~I~~~N AND N~T~~~ DF RI~~T'TO A~'~~A~L
P~rsu~nt to ~pokane ~~~nt~ R~solu~ion N~s. 9~-~17~ and 9G-~G~~, a~~ n~odi~ied b~ ~ount~ ° ~e~o~uti~n Na. l R07~~, ~~1~ ~~C1~1~~1 ~1~ H~~IlI1~ ~~~1I1~~' 01] ~fl ~~~11C~~1~I1 ~0~' ~ ~~I~~
rec~a~~ific~ti~n i~ fir~~~ a~d co~~l~~~ve un~es~ ~it~n ~ourtee~ ~14~ calendar da~s from the
~~am~ner's ~ritten de~~sion, ~ pa~y af recoz~ a~gr~e~~d ~y such d~ci~ior~ fi~e~ an appeal ~vit~a th~
Boar~ af ~aunty ~a~rim~s~xa~.ers af ~pol~~ne ~~u~t~, ~a~hin~tan,
Th.i~ dec~~io~ v~a~ rnai~ed ~ert~~'ied ~nai~ to t~e Appl~cant} and by regula~ r~~i~ to other
~arties ofre~~rd, an N~arch 4, 24~2. '~~IE AFPEAL ~~U~IN~ DA'~~ ~VIAR~H 18, ~~0~,
'~he co~a~lete r~car~ in ~hi~ m.atter, ~~c~uding this ~.~cisio~, i~ on ~le d~rin~ ~~e appeal
~~~od ~ith the ~ffice ~~e Hea~in~ Examir~er, ~'hird ~loor, P~b1ic ~ark~ Bu~l~ing, l ~ZG ~es~
Br~adwa~ A~enue, ~po~ar~e, ~a~hir~g~on, ~9~~0-~Z45, ~509} 477-749~. ~i~e ~ay ~e
1I1S~]~C~~C~ ~U~'1~1~ ~10~'I71~~ ~~~'~117~ ~10U.~~, ~i~ted Manda~r ~ F~ida~ of ea~~ ~v~ek, except
~.olid~ys, be~~en. ~~ae hour~ ~f 8:~4 a.n~, and 5:~4 p.~. ~o~x~s of~e documents ~n the record
~uill ~e n~a~e a~ailable ~t ~~e ~~s~ set b~ ~po~a~e ~~u~.~.
P~r~uant to R~~ 36,7~~. ~3~, a.f~'~cted p~r~pe~ty o~m~r~ may ~eque~t a~~.ange in ~aluation
for property tax ~u~pvse~ nvtv~~t~~tanding an~ pzo~xar~ ~f ~evalu~at~o~.
~E Fi~d~~gs, C~~c~us~o~~ and ~eci~~on ~E-2~-~1 Pa~e ~ 3
.
~
.p1 .~3 ~ Z
. ~ ~,ap . . ~~~~y
~~c
~,,t
~ ~ I ~ ~
, ~ w
I ~ ~ .''E~e e~a~ . ~
~ ~ ` ►
~,~~i r~? . i
r u ti „ T T~r. ...,~ni~~r ~ '~Q~~~1~~~1.►IL~11~I~I...ILIIw .llldll .».~,,j~~r
y ~ ~ ~ . r ' ~1 1
. ~ ~ 1 ,~d• , '
~ ~ ~ y 't~~~'
~ "~°"~a+ u`'~~~~,.. ~~ati '
~ ~ i~ i.~~~ r 'r,~ ~:J~+a ~,~~►~nr~ ~.i c~,c~ ,
~ . . 5'r'r'"""" ~ ~~►N
r~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ „ - { ~ ~ f. ~ . Y ~ ~
~ ~
3 ~ ~ ~ " , ~
t+►h? µ ' ~n $ $ '
4 ~r lne t8ry~ 8 0
~ Pro ress ~e ~ ~
~ ~ ~ve ~ rg a ~ ~nt8~ +47 D ~ ke ~ ~
~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~
~ = ~ ~ N a w G~,jde ~
~ r "3 ~ RyV~ ~
o~h p~nes - ~ ; ~ ~
~ ~ ~ g ae = Ath
li+~~ G S~
i ~ ~ ~ lh ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
x ~a ~ ~ ~ui P'~.
~ ~ u t ~ ~n „ ~ ~ c+ .
3 4 .
° i~ ~ IeY Sen~~r N~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 tr ~ V
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
° ~ ~ ~ ~
.13~ pr~ 1~ 0
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ►id+ ~
~ W ~
~ fi~' y l o• ~
~ ~ p~ `g ~ ~ ~ Q r ~ , P~'~ ~ ~ ~ x U
~
~ ~ ~ ` n ~ ?~rd
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 3 ~ Elem n~ ~ z~►ar t1s '~MY ~~t
C ~ P S ~ ~
Y ~ ~ `g V'ian+ty Map
~ ~ ~~~g~p1 ~ ~ 3 ~ trounded~
;1 inCh'
S~~
,
+ 9 ,
~ Z~N~ RE~LA~~~FI~AT~QN ~~r~L~CATI~N
PAGE 5 4f ~ ~ ~ , y ~ ~
~URV~Y~R 11E~1FlCAT~~N
~ fJ -
u~de~s~~ned, ~ licens~d land surveyor, have car~plet~~ t~~ inform~ti~~ q ~ ~ ~ rr~~~ ~nd w~i~t~ ~~ga cr~ .
r . ~ , ~ ~ °
Signed , ~ Dat~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ` :
~ .:'~~c
Add~es~ ~ . P1~an~ ! ~c , ~ + ~ . ,~~,r
~I ~ S~ ~ ~
~~k~~ ~ ~ ~ ~;Y ~~g~ ~ ~
~I~NATURE ~F PF~DP~~TY ~VIINER~ OR ~~T~'~~i 0~ AUTHDRITJ~TIDN
I, ~n~~r~igne~, swear or affir~r und~~ pe~a~ty ~f perjury ~haf t~e abov~ ~e~po~ses are made ~ruth~u~ly
. ~nd ~o #he b~s~ of my kno~ul~dg~. ,
i~c~r~her svir~ar ar a~fm t~at I am the o~rner of r~cord of the a~ea ~ro~ased #ar t~e pr~v#ously id~ntifi~d
1~nd use ac~ior~, if not the o~un~r, ~tt~che~ h~rev~ritf~ is writ#en pe~~n~ss~or~ fror~ ~he ow~e~ a~fhor~~ing
~~t~ons an ~islher b~half.
~Yy~~ ' 1 a 1~ ~
~ ~
Ad~r~~s ~ ~ Phone ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
~ ~~~e ~ ty ~ ~ S ~ ~ip ~ ~
~ ~ - - ~ . ~ ~ ~ / r
gnature of App~~ca ~r Repre~en~a~ive Dat~
~#at~ o~ Vlla~~ingta~ }
} ss,
~oun~y of ~po~c~ne }
~i~ned and ~~ror~ or a~irrned ~~~re me on thi~ day of ,~~p ,
b ~ ~ Y ~
~ No#ary ~~~I ~
. . : -.~s-. . . _ ~ Notary Public in and for ~he ~tate of INa~hingtan r~s~~ing .
~
WA~~A ~~ARK a#
N~~A~Y PUA~I~ ~ ~ ~JI ~pp~~r~~r~ent ex ire~ Y P ~
~TA~E ~11rA~~II~G~~~! ~~~R~~ ~Ai~UARY b, ~0~~
~ .r.,.,--.- . A.,~ PART ~V
,
~ ~ ~
C~MPL~~`~D ~1~ THE DIViSI~~V D~ ~L~INNI~I~
D~t~ s~brnitted ~ F~t~ n~r~ber 1 ~
~CC~~~~~ r t~r ~ 1 , A~~ ~r1~ ~ ~
~ ~otal f~~~ ~ ~ ~ecei t num~~~ P ~ .
i
I , ' . ~ ~ . ' , ; , , , „ , . . ~ • ' • ; ' . ~ . , . . . I .
M • ~ • '.i • , , . . ~ Z~Q.W / . . ~ . • . , ~ ~ ; . , ' . . . . . . , . ~ , ' _ . • ~ . ~ ' • .
. ~ • ~ ~ ' . . . . , . . ~ ~ , • , ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ , t ~ , . . . , , , . , , • . ~ . N M ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ . NOR1N t TRACT 85 OF VERA . . ~ , . ~
~ . . , d ~ . . , . . C ° ~ _ ~ " ~ ~ . . ~ s~ w g4~. s - _ _ . _ NS
~ . . . . . , . ~ I ~ ~ ~ a~.oo ~ ~~o. . ~saov ~a.oo
~ - ~ ~ ~ _ . . ~ , I 300.00 . ~ U~M~ST ~ Q , ~ 301.26 ~ • rt ~ ~ a~ ~ .
. ~ ~~sc~rn~nQ ~ ~ ~ D ~9 ! . 14 ~ D q ~ L A N*~ ~4 P~c L ~ _ . . D _ . ~ , ~ _ , I ;.p . . . . . . . . ~
~ . - ~ ~ ; , ~E ; SOUTH 1 2 ACT~~ 85 Of VER~1 SNEO , ~ , - w
~l • C ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ 0 ~ ~ ; . ; . . . D . . . ~ ~ -
i . . stor Cw / ~ , , ~ ~ &aar+q «+~oi~+ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ Q,~1 ` t W N h St
. ~3 - 'S t . C~? ~f ~ . ~ ~ . . . . , , C~ 5 ~F, , . . 1 ~ ~ . ; V L U ~ 1 ~ ~ - 6 ~ ~ . 1~~ w
~ . . .x,,~ . ~ vl . ~ , . ~ ~ _ . ~ . Hous~ . . o
. + ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 M . ~ . . ,r ~ . ~ , ~ , t. .._.L,..-,._._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . /y~" '"1 ~ - ► ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ , N Q il , ~ •d ~ ~ , ! , ~ ~ . O ~
~ ? ' • . . . ~ ~ ~ ; p ~ y ~ ~m . e~r+en r i ~ s I O ~ - E d s . , . . . ~ r .r ~ 1.70 A ~ , ~~cv O
1 z - .69 ACRE , c , • G c ; Z lt~ ~ ~ ~ 1 97 .V 1 ~ ~ 3 0 E c~ e o , ~ o c Y""Y . c
~r .y....~ ` _ , ~ ~ E s v ~ - ~ ~ 1 -••t t ~„pr ) ~ V i ~ _ I .i► ~ , , ~ E , . : , o ~ H ,
p~i , u o . - , o a, ~ o ~ ~ , ~ ; ~ fA w ~ . . M . ( Q, ~ . R _ ~.s~r~.,, 1 ~ , V p s ~ i , i;' vl ~i p r- , c ~ _t~.l a ' , ~ ~ ~1 W ~ . ,
Q ~ ~ ; , tf1 ' i- , . ~ ~ ~ b r_ • W ~ i - ; ; : rh a~ u , ~ ~ or ~
~ ~ I. V U. I r~ , p ~ ti W ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , - 1 ~ ~ r ; . ~7 ; ~ ~C~ r , ~ G~ . 5 , . , ~ : ~L1v $ ~ + ; o ~ o . ;
m ~ ~ i ~ ' - - ! N ~ m t~ ~ ~ u~~.a 5 . . ~ r ~G ~ , ~ ~ , ~ I V 1 D , • ~ t- ~ E t _ . , ~ . ~n o ~ i W o 'n _ _ , . ,,.~..~,.~.a ; t ° _ : _ _ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , . tP'°.~ ~ . ~
, r- ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . E , . ~ ~ : ~
- . ~ - ( ~ - I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ , _ ~ . - r "
4 I ~ l • ~r wi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~r r ~ r M~ ~ 4~ w'
~ A • ~ I ~ o . 54134___ , Y~ o 89'S2 03 W . ri m 1 N . 0 o Troct L~ne 9 . z~ ~
- - - ~ - - - - - I ~ ' ~ ~ w ~ ~ M /
N45~00 28 W ~ z • 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ .r. st _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ .r ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ •
2 .)9 ~ . : . ~I
i ~ ; . . , . , ; ~
Site demol~hon lan: Ho use A and Gara e w ~ 8 ill be r 1 . ~ e ocated to . P another site or demoiished. g • ~ ! ar . t.
aes q She ose ri s ds C an d D vcnll e b dem ol~sh s ed . . . ~
. ~ ~ ~ v ~ d ~ • G -1 T t~ 12 ~ N G~ ~ . . ~ CU ~c _ ~a ~c. S ~ c~ . . . T ~ 1 ~ f4C R~ S
. • ~ . . ~ ' d Pro ject p~~pn;
• ~ a 0 i~C-? ~r ~ ~ 3~: . 1 ~ I~ ~ - k~ l t~ . .R ~ , F . ~ O , ~ ~ 1]1 S . , Q (1]1 SC;,. fC.)
- e~ent 0 u~ ov e ~ ~ . ~t K I ~ 1 ~ T' ~ ~ S , . . I
~u~ a ~ , ' i ~ 1 . u1 ~ • (in sq. ft)
. a ~ , 1 s eas , , ~ ' i . ~ ~ , .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ e p ffi1 ~ 1T1~+ ~ . . . , . . . ~ . , , , ; , ~ . .
~ , 0~ 8r S ~ ~ , :
~ . . , ~ Z„ r~ ~ , lri . ~ t p aco CxC ar~s . ~ ercCott o eII . , ~ 1 . . ~ R
. ' . , . '~I"1~ ~T , uN C ~ , _ o ~ , ~ I / • ~ ~ , , . ~
d j ~ ' r ~ ~ . ~D N v . a . ~AL~ , ~ , , - . y
V
i
TECHNICAL RE'~IE~V MEETING
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIDN OF PLANNING
Date:
Department:
Department Contact Person:
Action: ZE-23-O1; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22} on approximately 3.39 acres for professional offices.
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING; DECE1ViBER 20, 2001 @ 1:1 S P,M.
N ote: '
The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency
comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard
before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or
binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and
schedulin~ of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of
this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminar~ review of
the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what
to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations.
The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information
(not all agenciesldepartments have been contacted--only those who have been determined
to have primary interest.
1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be
placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ~ ~ YES NO
b. If no, what is lacking? .
c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are
scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be
scheduled for the first available public hearing.
2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval"
would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary)
~
f
Parcel: 45143.1562
Owner: THORNBURG, FRIEDA
CoOwner:
t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . ~
Owner Address ~ ~ ~ ' , , ~ - 20215 N SPOTTED RD DEER PARK WA 99006-9722 USA ~ ~ ~
~ ~~~1~ r , ~ ~ ~I'~1~~`..,..~~
~ ~ ~ _ Site Address ,c _ ~ , - ~
I , ~ 13907 E VALLEYWAY AVE SPOKANE ~ ' ' _ - ~ I ~ - - i--~-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ . ~ ` L
Legal Descri tion - ~ _ - p , . ~
VERADALE S112 BLK 85 EXC SSFT & EXC UV40FT FOR ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ _
RD ~ , - ~ ~ , .
~ I ~ r~`' « , ~ .
_ - V _ . ~ -
i - . ~ ~ . R +~X 3~+ ~ ,Y y y
~ X . }•~tv 'r~ rY~; '4s I ~ i~--- Y ' V
~ ~ •~,4, ^r % ; ~ . ~ J ~ r~ ; . „r / - + , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j _ , ~ I
~ , ~ ~ , , ~ r
, _ . r , . , x 1 ~ ~ ~ - '
~ ~ ' l ~ I ~ ~ ~
i ! - _ ~ r , ~'S , ~T {p
1 1 1 ~ 11~ ~ , . ~ ~ - . ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ . ~ ~ r ' ~ . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ , . ~ 7"~ I 1 ~ .
SA - _ ~ _ ~ _ o . ,
~ y r
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
c~ . , _ . , ~ _ - ? , ~ ~~r ~ l
Notice: This is not a le al document. Data de icted on this ma is eneral & sub'ect to constant revision. It is intended 9 p P 9 1 for reference use onl . Le al documents should be obtained from the a ro riate a enc .
Y g pp p 9 Y
~ ' ~ ~ t7
T • ~ ~ , . 'J ~ ~ r .
~ t ~ ~ y-~ l~ , ~ - ~ ~1 / ~ 1 ` ~ 5 Q.1 ' . ! ~j .
~ i r ~ ~ r • : d ~ • ~ ' . ~ • . • ' ' • ~ `l.
..s" ~ 3 ~ C ~ . ~ ~ 4 ~ ~f .~-t-''` , ~ 4s ~ d, 4 • ~ ~ +C . d~. , ; . , ~
! ~ ~ ,~1 1 ~y y ~ Q . ~ ~ D r ~ 1 ~r', ~ ~ J ~ ~ ; 3 ~ . o v 3 _ ~ , 4 ~ _ _ ~ a ~
; ~5 , ` ~ . Z _ • ~ z ~ . d ~ ► ~ 2 n~ ,l 3 . ~ - ~N - Np f, i~ Z F E r~ o , . ~ z ~ d i ~ ~ 3 ~t t . . Y ~ , ~ ~ 12 Q Z ~ 3 ~ . ~1' s," ~ : ~
~ ~ 7 ' r' ~ lttl . ''y' ! ✓ ' ~ ~ t ~ 7 ~ t . 1tl ~ g ; ~ ~ , , (~W . 'o ~ , Z ' LL ~ + ~i Z 1
it .1 ~ r'Ci • ~ ~ i,••• ~ j ~ . ~ f .G II , fi+: • . . ~ r V ~ ► t~' ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ x ~ x . , ~ , a ~ ~ , . ,1 ` ~ r ~ < ' e ~ ~ i . ` ~ 4/~ ~ l' r~~Y ~ ~~J ~ ~ ~
~I S ~ 4 r.t~ .A' '7~ ~ +V t p ~ ' ° a ie'~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ i~~ { •k ~1 ~ : L' ~ . " ;FR ~ ~ 'w r1 f~C' ~ 4~, i~ '.5 i p ~ 5 ~ ~ ..ti +.,1 ~ ~ , , ~ ~
'r'~ 3 , , 2 It'f is t~~ ~~4 ~ " ~ ~ ~ .'v 1 if i .,~~t . , i - / b , ~ S- c f . :1! w ~ 1 t~ ~ , 'p '
~1 r~~ , t ~ ~ 7 ~ ~•1 ~ 3 1•f~ ~ r i~' S 1 l~ 1 ~ ~ r t' ~ ' .s~ b 5 q I , R~ . , t : '1 i ~ f b ~'a ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ R=; -
, t99' - ' t t ~ ~r. ~ y}D ~Z , , , ! 1L+` ~ i S ~ , . r + ~ ~ a ~ ~ r~ ~ 1 ' ~j 6 • .~.~-i s • ; ' , t ~ ~
. A S` , , , . i ~ ~ , " ; i~ 2 ~l ~ ; . i' ! , r ,o ~ ~ ~ ( r~ , • ( x G ' .1~ • ~ . ` 1~.. ~ 7 ~ . ,•,-~w . ; ~ ~ ; . : ; , r ? ~ y ~n r ~ r ~ ~ s = s, ■ . - ~
j ~ ~ ~ ~a~ ~S W~' • ~ ' • G . , , r ~ , _y , Q~~ ~ 1 o x N .•F~ ! I r. j~ L S • + 1 ~ ~ ~ I• J ) ~ H
~1 ~ ' ~ • . • ~ 3 , t,,,, 3 . $ , . ; ~ • ~ p~ G n, • , . ~ /~~y ; ~ io Q 1? , : ~ ~ ~ ~ • y ~ 1 Y 1 5 ! ~ • ~ ~ 1{ ♦ ~ ~ •A~ t. ? _ ~ . t~ ~ . t : ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ,0 9.~ av ~ ~ i
~ ~ . . 'r ~t ~ : , ► ~ /0 . ~ ,d. • ~ . ; hL ~1 ~ ui ~ t ~Ml~r►' ~ ~i ,.,,t, . , 7 ~ 1 , cD ► , ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ 4 ~ . ~ ~ ~.t 1,~ ; . ~ l~ ~
r ~ ~ ~ c~; . ~ - ~ 0 3 , • .ri ~ ~ . . I ~ ~ - Z. . 3 ~ Z - ~ ~ - x . ~ I r"` /J ~ ~ ~
l N i ~ • ~ . f . I .S ~ N ~Z ~ ~ ~ i , ~ C ~ i ~ ,t~ _ ~;p c ' s. ~ r 0
► 6 e22 i''!rz'`' ~""t , { ' +f'' ' s.~ . ~ Z ~ ~ t r+ - ~ . E t9 b ~ - ~ 1"~~' ~ t . `I ti p ~
Q= s i ~ Ta.~o r p 3. ~ ~ , ~ ~ ; ~ _ . ~ , ,o~. ~ , j1 Q. ~ ~ ; . ~ ~ : , ti ~1.
~ : ~ i ~ ' A 7 ' ~ ~ 0 J wS~.,,~ ' t ~ ~ ~ .;y=t f♦ r 1 ~ ~ • ~y ~ T~ ~l~/~' Z O Y ' 1 1 _ ~ . • ~ . ♦~i t ~ x .
C~ ~ r ~ ~ ~,/p ~ ~ ` ,1-• 's,'' a , . • c~t '4 , r~ , p, Y o:.; ~ ~,o ~ g' • s . . i ~ ► I "3 VY .~~t ~o ~ ~'r ~
, ~ ~,,s,. r . ~ r~ ~ . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : „ ~ ' ~ G ~ ~ M' ( ~ : , q ~ X . ~ ~o ~~3 ' ~l 1 , , ~ ~0 :,1~ - ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ f~ . . : . . . lr i ~ , , ~ G7 1p""'~ , 0.~2~~ ° + , i ` ' i,~o ,'Z _,.T,, N ~,w~+'+'~ ~'~'N ♦ 2 , . 1~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~ 1 1, ~ s ~ti ~ r ~ C ~3. ..r, 1 - ~
11 ~7 ~ ~ c. •~1 ~ ~ +.r ~ y~ ~ ~.»ti Cp1 Q ~ 1' ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O w ~ ~ / ( r r ,~w Q , ti ~ ~ ~
~ -i x " ~ : r. ~ ~ t ~ - ~ t ti,6J ~ S9 4 ~ r,.~ _ C1 i C~ ~ ~y~ ~ , ~Q 2 t .,~J~ ~ ~ 3 ~ti• L ~ ~ ~ , y At ~ , . 3 s.~ a' ~t'' %s.
R ~ 1~ t . o~~ .S ~ ~ ' ` ~ ~ N6• r ; "~y~ O c., t + ~ ' '1 ~ •t~ ~ ! % . .~3~1 ~ ~ + ~ ~ j ~~f N ~ , ~ m ~ t , 1 ~ • 1 tQ ~ r Z
~ ~ w ~ I .p~ 1 ~~,L~'/ ~ 1 ~ l1 /3 ~1 ~ 1` Z ► 1 t • ~S ~ ~ y • ~ . t N . . ~ ta Z N ,y `fJ M s w ~ . N ? f 't r,~„~ ~ Q ~ • . : i ~ / 7 , ~
~ 1 ~t ~ a t ( l ' o.. ~t . ~ % ~~t ~ . Y ~ , ~ ~ 7 ~ ~i r ~ Y ~ ~ y . r• • , , r 2 ~ 1 t I~~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ •K ~ a o ~ , ~ , . ~ ~ a , ~
. , J~ ~ s: ~ ; ~ a 1 y ;5 ` IM~ 1 l~! ~ ~ ~I ( ~ x ~ 2 1 , o t f ~ ~ ,r ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1~' , • . 4 4 ~ 1 x;~ ~ ~
~ •i ~ Q~ , 4 M i ► . ~ . , ~ ~ N 3 • t, ~ . A o 1 ; ' ~ ~ Q• g ; _ ~ ~t , ~
. ~ ~ . ~ } ,r--~ ~ , . ~ ~ , E , ~ r. _ _ _ , j~ 1 ~ , ~ • ; ~ ~ ~ ~ bp H ~ • ~dC ; . 3 I. ~ o I N AVE. N• tt ~ ~ ra i.;' ~ J' ~ , : ► r ~
4 { i ~ S ~i • p, ~ , ~ s , r r b ~ , i r~• h. r t~ 41 C. ` t ;l ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ .n~► ! M ~ , J ~ ~ ~ ' ~
1 Z~ 1 ' ~ d q ~ . ~ ~ , 4 ~ r . r~ ~ l , ~ 't' Q ~ r 4 • 3 ; N q ~ ~ Q C l
Q ~ ~ o a ~ . , c ~ F ~ / ~ , i~ , - ~ , ~ ~
b + j~ ~ io ~ ~ ~ve►rc~~D~ ! i , ~ .
a . ~ 3~ ► 6 ~ o ~ ~ , ' ~ r
i , ~ t ~ r,
l Y
i 1
. ~NGINEER'S RE'~lE'~~ SHEET
Pro~ect Status Active
As Built ~'i~ns R~~cived Rezone File ,ZE+ _00Z3-Q l -°1
Road 1'lans Apprave~ . Compani~n Fi1es: , r
New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Related Files: 7F.-0~17-Q1 SP-1251
HeAring: 0~/06/?002 1:30 Building Dept:
Technical Review: 12/20120d 1 1: l S I N~rvard Rd ~'lan Eng Special ~ees
Preliminary Review: rY(~: I_! Large Lot [31dg. Squarc Feet
Datz Re~~'i~~~cl: 12lQfi''001 No. Lats: No. Acres:
Projecr Name UR-3.5 TO UIZ-22 PROF~:SSIONAL OFFICES r`~:;:~ ~ ~a..
~ Site Address W. BANNLN, E. EVERGREEN, S. SPRINGFIELD, N. VALLF..WAY, VALLEYWAY E. 13907 t I
~pplicant Range-Ta«rnship-Section: 4~ - 25 -14 PARCEL(S): ((irst 20)
Ravrnc~n~ c~ ~'elev C'onditions Mailed: 451~3.1562
f~laad 'Lone No
'U? I~~. Sp~~tt~d h~l ~V~tcr Source Public
UC:ER PAI~, WA ~)~~6- Sewer Sourcc
I'h~~ne ~S(1~)) Z76-22~R Schaol Dist 35G f~~re Dist pl
Phonc; Dist
Eag Billing U~vner C~}rmond C Veley Freida Tl~ornherg Fst
~t~~ 15 h Spottcd Rcl 'U215 N. Spotted Rd Surveyor Michael C Phillips
UGER PARK, WA 9900b- SINiPSON ENGINECR.~ INC UCLK ['11ft~, ~V~1 9yUUG- Phone (509) 27b•2i48
I'h~~n< < ~091 ~?t7-'?48 909 N. Argonne Rd
tiPO1CANE, WA 99212
Phone ~509) 926-13?2 (509) 928-1028
Signed Name: EZAYMONU VELEY Fax (509) 92G-1323
Buiiding ~77•367~ IFlanning 477-7ZOO /Engineer 477-3600 CantacE B/P TAMMY JONES Contact En~ ~R~G BALDWI;~
Date Submitted DescriPtion lnitials
~ng Need'I'echnic~lly Complete Eng Need Narvard Rd Mitigatian
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Ne+~d Tra~c Analysis Eng Need Other
l 11ZUlZ001 Lng Agree Aay Fees Received Eng rinal Plat Fees Complcted Cupy to Accounting Eng Agrce Priority Fees Received 11126I20Q1 Eng Prelim Piat Fees Campleted
/ / Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Campleted - or Needs to be signed Design Deviatinn Da1es (fn-Out)
. - , ~ ~ - ! ~ ~ . - : ,
i 1 l l l I
1 I l l l I ~~nd quanties tor
dra~na~c ~tem calculated , Hearing Date Decision V App ~ Den Cond Appld BCC
App~ai~d ta BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Court
Anpealed ta Court Decision App I~n Cond Appld
/ / Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy}
/ ~ Stamned ZOR l.ot Plans to Secr~tary (Sandy)
. : , _ , ~
- _ - : _ _ _ , - - - - , ~
~
i
~ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . -
~ o ~ _ ~ ~ J~ ~ 1~ . 1 ~J~
~ 1 ' i~ 1( 1 l ` l~- ~ ll
~
~ ~ ~ STAFF REP4RTT~THE WEARING EXAM~NER
r
~ , FII.E ZE-23-01
~
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPO CO
HEARING DATE: February 6, 2002 @ 1:30 p.rn. FI~E ZE-23-01
PROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTiON: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 ~UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 3.39 acres for professional offices and those uses
allowed in the Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone.
Pro~ect Data
~ Project Loc~tion: . ~ The subject property is generally located at t
~ ~ northeast corner of the intersection of Evergreen
~ ~ Road and Valleyway Avenue, in the SW %4 of Section
~ 14 Townshi 25 North Ran e 44 EUUM k n , p , g , Spo a e ~ ~ County, WA.
Parcel Number(s): ~ ~ . 45143.1562
~►pplican~ . Ray Veley
~ ~ 20215 N. Spotted Rd.
~ DeerPark, WA 99006
, ~ . (509) 276-2248
Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ Urban
Zoning; . Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) ~xistin~ Land Us~: ~ Single family residence and undeveloped land
Surr~undin~ ~ar~in~ and ~.and Uses: ; . ~
Nor#h. . Zoning to the north of the site is Urban Residential-
3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
~ . ~ ~ : _ classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS} in 1958 (ZE-
~ ~ 166-58). Land use to the north of the site consists of
~ ~ single family residences, and undeveloped land. • South~ ~ Zoning to the south of the site is Urban Residential-
3.5 ~UR-3.5} established in 1991, previously
~ classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS} in 1958 (ZE-
~ ~ ~ 166-58). Land use to the south of the site consists of
~ ~ . , single family residences.
~ • East; ~ Zoning to the east of the site is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as . Agricultural Suburban (AS~ in 1958 (ZE-166-58).
Land use to the east of the site consists of single
. ~ family residences.
• West~ Zoning to the west of the site is Urban ~esidential-3.5
(UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as
ZE-23-01
Staff Report - February 6, 2002 Hearing
1 of 7
. t
` A ricultural (A) in 1940 ZE-60-40 . Land use to the 9 ( ~
west of the site consists of single family and duplex
residences and the Vera Water & Power Company
~ business office. ,
Recent larrd use ~ctinns ir~ Recent land use actions in the vicinity of the subject surrounding area: site include:
ZE-12-00; Zone Reclassification from UR-22 to B-3
. on approximately 2 acres for those uses allowed in
~ the B-3 zone, for property located 900 feet south of
the subject site along the east side of Evergreen Rd., approved by the Hearing Examiner on September 8,
2000.
~ ~ ZE-10-99; Zone Reclassification from UR-3.5 to UR-
22 on 2 acres for a professional office, for property
~ ~ located mile north of the subject site along the west
side of Evergreen Rd., approved by the Hearing Examiner on September 26, 2000.
ZE-23-98; Zone Reclassification from UR-3.5 to UR-
22 on approximately 5 acres for 110 multi-family
. ~ residences, for property located %z mile northwest of
~ the subject site along the north side of 6roadway
~ ~ ~ Ave., approved by the Hearing Examiner on . . September 13,1999.
PE-1770-95; Preliminary Plat of Evergreen Place to
: divide 3 acres into 11 lots for single family residences
- ~ with a zone reclassification from UR-3.5 to UR-7, for
. property located 300 feet south of the subject site ~ ~ along the west side of Evergreen Rd., approved .by
. ~ ~ the Hearing Examiner Committee on February 23,
. . . 1995.
~ SP-1251-00; Short Plat to divide 3.39 acres into 2 lots
~ for single family residences, for the subject site,
~ ~ approved by the Division of Planning on October 2, - . 2000.
- . SP-1034-95; Short Plat to divide 1 acre into 2 lots for
, ~ single family residences, for property located north of
~ . and adjacent to the subject site, approved by the
~ Division of Planning on September 14,1995. ,
, Land Division ~tatus: The subject property consists of a Tax Parcel of . ~ Record. A Short Plat, SP-1215-00, was approved for
the subject site.
Shoreline ~esi~nation; ~ Not applicable
Water Pur~reyor: ~ Vera Water & Power Company
Sew~g~ Disposal: ~ The site is to be served by the Spokane County
, public sewer system. ~ire Distric~ Spokane County Fire Protection District #1
ZE-23-01
Staff Repo~t - February 6, 2002 Hearing
2 of 7
. ~
~ ~ . Ne~~ir~s~ Ar~~`rial ~nd:Distanc,~~ The site is located adjacent to both Evergreen Road
. ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - and Valleyway Avenue. The Spokane County Arterial
, - . _ : ~ : . ~ ; ~ ; ~ . . : -i ~ ~ ; ~ : _ ~ Road Plan designates Evergreen Road as a Principa! . ~ - - . .
Arterial and Valleyway Avenue as a Mlinor Arterial. - . ~ - ~
- , . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . : ` . ~ : ( _ No dedication or Future Acquistion Area (FAA) has ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . - ~ - ~ : - - ~ been recommended by the Spokane County Division
, ~ ~ , : ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ . ~ _ , of Engineering and Roads.
- Nei~hb~~~oad~ As~ocia~~o~, ~ iVone known
• ; - _ _ - ~ ~ ~ . . . , , - - - _ . „ - ~.E ~ ,Et - - , , ~ r ~ , . . . ~
• This proposal is I~cated 'onside the Urban Growth Area (UGA~.
° This proposal is Iocated inside the Public Transportation ~ene~t Area (PT~A).
GMA1Critical Areas
. ~ _ ,
~►q~~~:~r ~e~h~r~~~ ~1r~.a: : ~ - _ ~ _ . - ~ ~ The subject property is located within the ~ ~ , . - _ = ~ _ : ~ ~ - ~ Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the ~ _ - - - . . _ .
. . ~ . . . . _ . - . ~ _ ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ ~ Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. . ; ~ - ~ . _ - - - , _
~ - ;~~s~ ~~I~I~li~e H~bi#~~ ~or~~~r~ati~n:Area~;~ ~;I~~- None illustrated on the Spokane County
_ ~ . - : ~ : - _ _ ~ - ~ - . ~ : : - : : , Critical Areas Maps. - _ - - . . . - . : _ .
The site is not located within a flood lain Flaa~ipla~n: = : - - = - P - - . ~ ~
~ ~eo~o~iG~fly:~a~~~QUS qrea~Sp~ ~ _ : ~ None illustrated on the Spokane County _ ~ _ , _ _ , ~ : - ; - L. _ _ ; Critical Areas ~Jlaps.
. . . ~ - , ~ . . .
~~~~~~a$; ~ ~ ~ . None illustrated on the Spokane Coun~y ~ : - . ~ Y~ I ~ . ~ - Critical Areas Maps.
. - . .
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on January 18, 2002, with a comment period ending on February 4, 2002.
Noti~inq
Published: The proposal wras published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on January 18, 2002.
The deadline for notifying property ownersltaxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal was January 21, 2002.
Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for posting public notice on the site was January 21, 2002.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Submitted: November 26, 2001
Date Notice of Decision is due: March 26, 2002
Reviewing A~encies
12 agencies were notified on December 7, 2001, and January 9, 2002. Comments were due on December
20, 2001, and January 23, 2002. _ _ . _
- . ~ ' p ~ g ' '~i ed . _ - _ ~ . ~ . ~g+~nCSes ~~atified ~ . : : : Re~ ~n~~ Da~e A er~c~~s. N+a~i - ` _ _ ; ~ ~ Res ~ns~ Da~~e, . - - ~ - : ~ ~ , ~ ' . . - ~
- - ~ - - ~ ~~Ce~ved , R~c~i~ed ae~~i~~d R~c+~~ved - _ . , , ~
Spokane County Division Yes 12120101 Spokane Regional Yes 12/20101 of Engineering; Health District
Transportation , . ~
Spokane County Divis~on No Central Valley School No
of Engineering; District No. 356 d 1 f r
ZE•23-01
Staff Repo~t - February 6, 2002 Hearing
3of7
T Z- ~ - „ . - ~ _ _ . _ ~
~ Development Senrices - . - - - ~ < < ,
Spokane Coun~ Division i Yes 1/14102 Spokane County ~ire No
of Utilities Protection District No.1 ~ ~ - - ~ - -
Spokane Count~ No Vera Water & Po~rer No
Stormwa~er Utili~y Company ~ ~ Spokane County ~Division No Spokane County Air Yes ~ 12/7101 '
of Building & Code Pollution Control ~
Enforcement Authority ~ , , _ ~
Spokane Transit Authority No 4~Fce of Historic No
Presenration ' ~ ' ~ , _ ~i ~r ,6:~ , . r. ~ = J . ' ■ _ _ _ ~ ~ _
A~enc~ Comm~nts:
Agency comr~ents received are ~in the form of recommended conditions of approval.
~~boic C~o~me~ts: Comments were received from neighboring property owners expressing concern over incompatibility of the
proposed use with existing residences to the north, east and south o~ the site, impacts to property values
and additional traffic along Valleyway Avenue.
~escri~ti~n of the Sn$e:
The subject site is approximately 3.39 acres in size and contains an existing residence and associated
outbuildings.. The site ~s Iocated adjacent to Evergreen Road and Valleyway Avenue, and is generally flat with a siight rise in elevation from south to north. Evergreen Road is a recently improved 4 lane roadway
with curbs and sidewalks, and Valleyway Avenue is a 2 lane roadway without curbing or sidewalks.
Surrounding land uses include single family residences to the north, east and south of the site, with
duplexes and a water district business o~ice located along the west side of Evergreen Road:
~ack~round:
The application for the proposal was submi~ted to the Division of Planning on November 26, 2401. A Determination of Cornpleteness was issued on November 30, 2001, and the Technical Review meeting was
held on December 20, 2001. Notice of Application was issued on December 12, 2001, with~a 14-day public
comment period ending on December 26, 2001.
The s~te is located within the Urban Grav~h Area (UGA}. 4n August 24, 2001, the ~oard of County
Commissioners adopted a Comprehens~rre Plan consistent uvith the requirements of the Grouv~h
Management Act, RCUV 36.70A, however, the Comprehensive Plan was not implemented until January 15, 2002, when the Board of Coun~y Commissioners adopfed the Phase I Development Regulations, Resolution
#2-003~. The subject application was submitted on November 26, 2001, and is subject to the
Comprehensive Plan policies in e~fiect at the time of submittal. Section I, Transitional Provisions, of the
P~ase I Development Regulations states ~hat ~UVithin the UGA Boundary, any zone reclassi~cation
application that does not comply with this ordinance but is considered counter complete prior to the date of
adoption of this ordinance, shall be allowed to proceed with the reclassifcation pracess under the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations in place at the time the application is made. I~f approved, the
zone reclassi~ication shall. be effective for one year from the date of final approval and building permits must
be applied ~or during this time. At the end of the one-year period, the zoning shall crossover to the new
Zoning Map designa~ion for the crossover matrix." If the application is approved and the building permits are
not applied for within one year o~ the approval date, the zoning of the subject site uvill crossover to the Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone,
Sta~f Analysis:
Pr~je~t Des~a°i~tion: The proposed project consists of a Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-
3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 3.39 acres for professional offices. The site
ZE-23•01
Staff Report - February 6, 2002 Hearing
4 of 7
e •
,
plan of record illustrates six (6) separate o~ice buildings, ranging from 3500 40 5600 square feet in size wi~h
a maximum height of 35 feet, and associated parking and Oandscaping areas.
,
Comp~e~~r~save PI~~:
The subject property is loca#ed within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide the oppor~unity for the development of a"ci~ylike" environment with intensive
residential uses and public facilities and senrices. Detailed Definition B states ~hat ~Since urban areas wi11
be the most intensely developed of all the categories, it is primarily a residential category of single family two
family and multifamiiy along with neighborhood commercial and light industrial uses. The more intensive
land uses uvill be located near the heavily traveled streets, while the least intensive residential uses will be
isolated from the noise and heavy traffic."
The site is located adjacent to Evergreen Road and Valleyway Avenue. The Spokane County Arterial Road
Plan identi~ies Evergreen Road as a Principal Arterial and Valleyway Avenue as a Nlinor Arterial.
Detailed De~inition D states that "Due to the variety and mix of land uses and activities found in the Urban
category, few land use activities would be inappropriate. Many uses may require screening or other
standards to make them compatible with one another."
Dec~sion Guidelines 1.3.3 and 1.6.1 recommend the provision of sanitary and storm sewer for developments
to protect water quali~y when the provision is consistent uuith Coun~y plans, policies and regulations. Public
sewer is available to the site and stormwa~er facilities are required for site development.
Decision Guideline 1.5.1 recommends the use of buffering andlor landscaping to mitigate the difference
be~reen proposed developments and exesting uses. Section 14.806.040 of the Spokane Coun~y Zoning Code requires a strip of Type I landscaping, a minimum of 20 feet in wid~h, along all property lines adjacen~
to the existing Urban Residential-3.5 ~~JR-3.5) zone. The subject site is bordered on the north ar~d east by
the Urban Residential~3.5 (UR-3.5) zone and Section 14.806.040 also requires a 20 foot wide strip of Type
III landscaping along Evergreen Road and Valleyway Avenue. In addition, Section 14.622.365 of the Zoning
Code requires a six (6~ foot high fence, wall or sofid landscaping to be constructed along the internal
property boundaries. This requirement is intended to supplement the required landscaping.
Decision Guideline 1.5.4 recommends that sidewalk ~acilities be required along arterials connecting
residential areas with commercial areas. Evergreen Road is a 4-lane road with existing curbs and
sideuualks, and Valleyr~ay Avenue is a 2-lane road with no curbing or sidewalks. The Spokane Coun~
Division o~ Engineering and Roads has recommended a condition of approval requiring the construction of
8.5 to 10.5 of additional asphalt along the Valley~ray frontage of the site, and curbing and sideuualk.
Objective 1.5.e recommends that when a neighborhood experiences pressure for a change of character,
such change shall be permitted~ upon appropriate review. The proposed use is located with direct access to
arterials and vuithin close proximi~y to a larger transportation netv~ork. The proposed use is more intensive
~han what currently exists in the adjacent areas and the site as located adjacent to existing residential uses.
Required landscaping, fencing, building setbacks and proposed building height may~help to reduce impacts
to residential homes Iocated adjacent to the site.
Zoni~~:
The purpose and intent of the proposed Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone is to set standards for the
orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is
compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values. It is intended that this
zone be used to add to the varie~y of housing types and densities, and as an implementation tool for the
Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. Professianal offices are permi~ed in the Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) zone in orde~ $o provide some of the service needs generated by high-intensity land uses. The Urban Residential-22 ~UR-22) zone is intended primarily for multiple-family dwellings and is usually Iocated
ZE-23-01 Staff Report - February 6, 2002 Hearing
5of7
• ,
t ~
adjacent to major or secondary arterials. The subject site is located adjacent to Evergreen Road, which is a
Principal Ar~erial and to Valleyway Avenue, which is a f~inor Arterial.
Existing zoning in the area of the site consists primarily of Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Recent zone
reclassi~ications to the Urban Residen~ial-22 (UR-22) zone ~rithin'/ mile of the subject site include ZE-23-98 and ZE-10-99.
Sate Plan:
The site plan of record identifes pro~essional office buildings, ranging in size from 3500 to 5600 square feet
in size, to be accessed by one driveway located on Evergreen Road, and one located on Valleyway Avenue.
The~site plan illustrates that ~our of the buildings are to be located near the north property line of the site,
with fi~o buildings Iocated along Valleyway Avenue. The site plan illustrates required parking areas and sight obscuring fencing a# the perimeter of the site.
Proposed Use: Professional offices
Total ~uildinQ Area: 26,700 square feet
Site Plan Data:
Proposed RequiredlAllowred
~uilding Coverage 18%% 65% maximum
Building Height 35' 50 feet
Landscaping
Evergreen Road None identifed 20' Type III
Valleyway Avenue None identified 20' Type III
Inte~al property lines 20' Type I 20' Type I.
Building Setbacks ~
Front yard ~Evergreen Rd,} 35' frorn property line 25' from property line Front yard (Valleyuvay Ave.) 30' from property line 30' from existing Future Acquisition Area
~F~~ .
Side yard ~nor~h) 20 feet 5' per story minimum
Rear yard (eas~) 20 feet 15 feet
Parking 158 spaces 77 spaces
The site plan of record illustrates general compliance with the development standards of the proposed
Urban Residential-22 ~UR-22} zone with the exception of required landscaping. The required Type III
landscaping, 20 ~eet in u~idth along the Evergreen Road and Valleyuvay Avenue is no4 illustrated on the si~e
plan of record, The applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with the landscaping standards of
Chapter 14.806 of 4he Zoning Code prior to building permit issuance, if the proposed zone reclassification is
approved.
Change~ Condi$~o~s;
Section 14.402.020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that am~ndments to the Zoning Map may
occur when it is ~ound that "Changes in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to
war~ant modifca~ion," Changed conditions in the area of the proposal may include recent improvements to
Evergreen Road.
ZE-23-01 Staff Repor~ - February 6, 2002 Hearing
6of7
1 t
~ l
S$af~ St~mo~ao~►:
~he proposed zone reclassification is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision
Guidetines of the Urban category and may ir~plement the purpose and intent of the proposed Urban
Residential-22 (U~-22) zone.
At~ac~~en~s:
A. ~Naps
0 Vicinity Niap
o Site Development' Plan
~ Comprehensive ~lan
o Zoning B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency Comments
~
ZE-23-01 Staff Report • February 6, 2002 Hearing
l of l
, ~
1
~ A~ac~~~~~ ~a
~I~P~S
~VO.C;~NITV 9~A~
SlTE ~EVEL P6~ENT P~.A~O
CONOP~EH~NSIVE P~A~O 6~AP
Z~~I~ING MAP
~~23~~0°~ ~
Exi~i~ ~ Z~~~~ ~ ~ ~
_ -
~A• ~ ~ -
, U ~ 0 7~
' Ao ~A•~. 42
u~• 1~ gc ~ s~ ~
U~•~.6 60 42 ~ l~R• .5 ~~8 A•3 51 G U•~. 1~0
~
allo ~a~.6 ~ . ~ .516
~ , U~• U 5C ' ~•7 6
_ U 7 ~T ~
~ , ;
~ - U•~. 5~ S? U~• 6~ , 900
R•2~ ~ C U~. 4 6~ .5 5~ C
. ~A~~,~- - .
~ ~
ti ,
~8R .5 6~
U~•~.~ 6~ ~O ,
~
- 6 ~1 . .
/
~.512~ ~ ~
~ ;
+ V~'~ .Fa ~ ~ ~ \
I Gl •8.61 ~ ~8.~6-5'~- U 40 R. , :
G13 6 • 5S~ ~ _ U . 14 ~p ~ _ _
V r y
' ~ .5 ~ ~6 ~ <<~ t ~ ~ . .
. C ~ ~ . 6
' A•i.s 0~O •S. 6~ U•7 5C , . ~e B9~•~2 ~9C u
. •2~ 60 O , ~
. ~ 'YO ~~6 ~ °1~ j ~~~ie~ ~N~ ~ Y~Y ~
~ 6•~ 92 OOC
I 6 ~~C Riv
12618~ D•a ~ 8 C g c ~ ~ ~ I 16 ~ C . ~ 6~C . 9 5 ~OC '
g. 6•~ 25A'T8C ~•8 26 79C ~ ~ ~ ~ . z ~ - S~ra~ue ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ___._r ~ - - ~ . - ~ ~ ~ , ~
1 T1C 4 7!C
. ~ iC ~ ~ ' ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 c' ~ ~rC
1~~ , ~ I ~
• ac 2 + ~•8 6~ 8~~ ~ 1
~ Y°V 16 86C
~•s 7 1 C ~•S 291~C
. ~ ~
Scale :1 irx~ m S00 ft(~oundec~ 11119/01 Existing Zoning
l
~~~~~~o~~ ~o~~ ~
~ -i _ - . . _ . _ _ ~ . _ _ ^ _ - ~ 3 i y
\I
~ y
1 ~
~ ~ , , ~ j ; ~ I
4,,_ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ --~Zg 1
f I : q ~ I
_ - - ' ~ ► ~ M
~ ~ _ - ~ ~ --l-- ._1_ ~ ~
~ _ ~ .
_ ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ ~ _ ~
n ~ ~s ~ , _ - ~ _ - ~ __L._
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ _
_ , _ _ _ - ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ~ ,
- - ~
~ ; ~ ~ ~ _ _ a u,: ~i
~ ~ " ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
1 ~~1 • ~ ^ ~
~ , ~s I 1~ ~ . ~
- ~ ~ - „ ' ~ ➢'"w~.l ~
~ ~
0
a ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~
~ ~ _ _ I ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ - ~•~-4~ - r
_ _ . ~`,i.~. - - ~ 1 i ~ ~ ,
I ~ ~~y` ~ ~ /
~ ~ r ' iVV~~ I ! ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ,
~ . ~ . - . ~ ~ . . ! _..~~Pra "e . , . , . , ~ ~ : ;
! _ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ -
~ ~ - ~ - - ~ ~ ~
~ - - - - F , _ ~ ; ~ ~ ~
, ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
,
~ ! ~ v ~
~ , ~ ; ~ , ~
~ - - I ~
.~+A -
~ ' Y CrySrdl vt ' P - ,
~ ~
- ~ - - . ~ 1 ~ _ ~ y _
Scale :1 inch Q 833 ~t ~rounded) 11i29/01 Comprehensi~e Land Use Plan
Subject Proper~y within IUGA. Subject Proper~y within UTA. i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e~.~.:,.... e........~.,...:•~:.. ~G~~A ~..~:__.n.._~_........:.,~:~
- w v w • ~ ~ W OUU)Glit rfUIJCf ty WfLlllll rQQM. - ~'-"'Zuuject rrvWny wiuIin rvh.
' , . i .
' ' ~ : . • ~ , , . . , ~ ' . ~ , • ' . ' . ~ i , ' . r 1~. ' . 6 1 , e a ♦ . . . , , , aaa~ , . . . _ . . . . ~ . ~ ~ : . .
. . , , o . , , . . • . , . ~ , ~ , • . , . : ~ , • , • ' ~ . . . . ~ ~J • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i . . . . 1,. ~l ~i . ~ • i ~ , . ~ ~ i ~ , . p ~ ~ ~ ~ . • ' .
I ~J. ~ . ~ . , NORrN 1 TR~CT ~5 U~ 1lE~i~ . . ~ . ~ . . . . ~ ~ . , . • ~ ~ ~v ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ,~Q9 - _ , C ~ . ~ . ~ ~
- • `11 t o • . ~ . ~p ~ ' ~ • ` W . ~ ~ , • , ~y~~ . .
240 . l3~Q0 Sa00 , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~-,v~-.. a . „ C ~ ~ _ I ~ . .~0~ ~ ~M+~ST - Q s • I . I r ~~i' / 0~ , ~ 1 1 ~
' . o i~~►1 L t v~ B (7 ~ . o ~ L N o~A P~ ~ ~ ~r ~ D . L ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , _ , , . _ .
I ,.Q ~ _ . z ~ - E . , , . . . , - - , ~ a ~ : sou1H ~ a ~c~ e~ o~ r~~
o ! ~ . , ~ ~ , ~ , , . . , . . 0 ~ . . ~ . , .
. D , D , _ , . . . - . . . . - a,~ . . ~ ~C . , A~ eu~r+q~ Qo ca~e+~+ . _ l . ~ , I _ ,
~ ~ ~ . . ~ , 5 ~ • . ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ , 8.~ . e. ~ , ~ - . . . . . . , , , r9 ~ , .,D r . ~ ~ . V14.17e~ .
_ 6 . ~ l~~ o~ ~ o ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ t V~ - , fl . ~aa ~ 4q~ ~ ' ' Q , . . , -
~ ~ 4 _ ~ _ ~ s . , . .o. ~ _ r- -w. _ . .ti-_..__~_ - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ o . v" ~ ~9 . . . ~ ~ tyr . p oa . ~ ~
' ~ ) I , •a o i , ~ ~ ~ , . 1 ~ , 3 ! o _ e~ne~ ! , . ~ ~ „ Eds . y _ _ ~ p . o
•r I o I"~ ; ~ 1.69 ~►CRE a ~ , . ~ , c ~ Z ~ t ~ I ° e~ ~
~li ~ ~ 1 07 . Vo0le o ~ ~ , 39 E Vo , c c o c G ~ ~ ~ . ..r C ~ . ~1'~`~' ~ ~ ~ t V ~ , i ~ ~ . a► > ~ ~ ~ 0 , - _ E . ~ ~ L~ . o_
~ ~ ~ I ~r ~ O w- ~ ' ' , ~ ~ ~ . . I ~ O I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w . • , . ~ . ~ • I . tT• ~ ~ 0 . r o,,, ,
• u . _ t,~ . ~ • I,J. A . In Q ~ , t ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ I , ' ~s ~ 1 , ~ • : ~ i ~ a, ~ '
W W ~ ~ ~ ~0 » a. , . ~ ~ r t7 - v . ~ . v , ~ l ~V w ; } , ~ _ I ~ _ . ~F . ~ Ob ~ ~ p4 5 D , . . . o .
, Q~ OCx~ 5 , ~ o ~ o - ~ ~ aa ~ ; ; m . V~l.~ ~ ~ ~ ' . t ~ • ~ .r- • . VI D . . _ ~ _ ~ . . . ~ , ~ 0 1 , , ~
~ ~ . ~ ~ _ - .a.~.o . . , _ ~ ~ ~ . _ . , r i ` , ,l~Y ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ .D . . , ,r ~ • • I , . c~" , ~ . i
- ; ~ ' . l ~ . . k _ - • i~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ e ~ o~ w~ ~ ~rt a~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_r - ` , l~~l/ ~ . . . ~ • ~ • + +1 . ~ ~ ~ ' A`~ ~
f~ L Y~ ~ ~ Y~ O 617 ~ ~ . ~r , - , O r a~ ~ 01 ~ C71 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Ci ~ ~ . ~ ~ T ~ 0~7 ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 ~ , O ~ ~ . ~ • • ~ o ~ 89 N . . Or~ ~nol YrocQ Lune 9 , a~
I ~ _ _ . ~ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . ,
~ I , o m ' i 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ , e ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ , ~ 1 - - ;
d • ~ I ~
i
' i _ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ " ' " ' . • I ,
• • ~ Sate d~a~o~ho~ 1~~: lHo ' . . ' . ~ use A d . a~ C~ara w e~ il t t be r l c~ e o e o another site or dea~ h o ~s ed. P g
. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - . ~ ~ ~ ~ D will ~ ~ . de~o . e~~• ~ J=7
. 4 , _ • i , ~ . o ~ o . ~ O _ a'~' ~t I 6u Gr . _ - ~ - , . ~
S~~~ ~ . _ ~t _ ~T~ ~ ~,r ~ _ _ o~. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ , t
d Pro t ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,a . r 9 ~ ~ • ~ ~t V a S _ , ~ , . , , ~ e ~ i~ . . ~ (in sq.
i ~wo ~ , I , . . i . ! , , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~P° t 1 ~ ~ ~ \ 4 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. . , . ~ . o , . . ~ ~ ~ _ _ . , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ (in sq.
. , . °°1"f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ; ; B . , i.m~s ~ ~ ~ . ~ . " ' r
t • r ~ ' • ~w ! , ' ~ . . ~ o, . • . . ~ o~ Q~ I ,
4~~ . ' . I ~ ~ ~ ffi o . . , ~ 8~"~$ _ _ ;,~e. . ~ , e- Cm sqo ft.)
, o , , • , , . ~ . . ~ ~ . • r ~ . , ~N f t.
~ . ~ ' i r / . , ' , . / A~ . 1~~, ~ • . > ~ ' ' Ir . ~ f~ ` P~► a C i°I l.~ P • ~ ~ _ t_ . ~ ~ . , . , ,
, . . , , . . .
1 ~
~ m~~ ~3
~ ,Z m ~~p ~ . i~~~' _ , ~
~°ic
,
~,n ~ ° ~ ~ F~ ~
1~~, . ~g ~
~ C~w ~ ~
~ ~~Y ~ . EI~ ~ ri~' '
~ ~ti r ~tT~~
1 ~ ~ ~~~~~t ~ 1 • - CI T'" ~i~~`'`1111"Ir,
~~~a~i.itl.~u~...1..1~t u~t h t ~ ti~rl
~ a ~ Lrl ~ ,
t~ ~ ~ tt v ~
i~ ~ ~ ~Sftdd llt,~,~~~~ ~ ~~''4t~~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ t!i~.~ur' " rtia~t n~~i~r Y~ _ ~ ..i _ t~.i~ ua~na ,
sv , ~ 1 ~
M~a°'~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ .
~ - ~ ~ a
~ w ` ~ . . g ,
~ 3 , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~ S p~ki
~ ' d~~~ ~ ~sS
~ o ~ ~ , $ ~8~ ~
~ ~ ~s W
~ ~ t~ ~ ~
.
~f~ a ~ ~r ~ o~ ' ~ $
~ ~
4t~' sa+ R~~o
~ ~ 4 ~ ~ . ~
4 +~'t: ~ , ~ ~y
$ ~'@ ~ ~ ~
S' S'~ 4 r
~ ! ~~~dQ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 8 ~~~p ~ :~81/ ~
g 3 ~ s
~ ~ 4 ~ P
3~ Ai !3 ~
. , , ~ 0
~ ~ 11d~ ~ ~ l~ ~
Sr ~ • ~a, ~ ' a
~ ` Q R j , ~ r~ 9 ~ ~ r
~ ~
, ~
- a ~
a M,,~I1 ' El~~ ~t
8y~m' r r I ~ n u.
~ ~
~ ~ vian~~Y M~p 4 d~ 1112910~
. p83 ~ ~~oun~
le;lm~o2 S~
. ~ !
V
~
A~"AC~~R~~6~T ~
C~~NDIT~~NS APP~~J~A~.
t 6
~
REC~~IMENDED G~NaITiONS
APPROVAL FOR ZE-23-0'I ~,l
DIVISION OF PLANNING
~Pa ~0 K~~ v~;rY
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies to the following real property: Veradale S112 Block 85 except S5
ft. & except V1140 ft. for Rd.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-22 ~UR-22) zone and the Aquifer
Sensitive Area ~ASA~ Overlay zone, as amended.
4. The applicant shall develop the subject proper~y generally in accordance with the cancept
presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the Director of the
Division of Planningldesignee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building
Iocation, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the
original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
5. Approval is required from ~he Director of the Division of Planningldesignee of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permit.
- 6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend overthe property
boundary.
7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable to the Director o~ the Division of Planningldesignee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any
building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at
access points is not obscured or impaired.
8. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecfiing the property in question. The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall
only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
ZE-28-01 February 6, 2002 Public Hearing
Division of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
The ~~rc~~ of proper~yy legass~ d~scr~obed as os the su~j~ct o~ ~ lar~~ use
ac$so~ by a Spok~~e Co~r~~y Heari~~ ~~~mine~° o~ F~b~u~ry 6, 2002, omposong a
v~~~~~y of s~e~ea~ develo~~e~t ~on~o~~~ns. Frle Noo ZE-23~0~ ~es ~v~a~a~l~ for
io~s~~c~ion a~d copyiu~~ in the S~ok~o~~ C~~sn~ Davisoon of ~Oann~o~go
9. The applicant has one year from the date of approv~l to obtain building permits to develop
th~ subject proper~y per Section I of ~he Phase I Development Regulations adopted on 11~ 5102 ~by Resolution #2-0037, as approved. If building permits are not obtained within
one year of the date of approval, the proper~y shall crossover to the Urban Residen$ial-3.5
(UR-3.5} zone.
f_ " ~
ZE-28-01 February 6, 2002 Public Hearing
Division of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval~
!
~
~~racH~~~T ~
~t~E~C~ ~~fD ~~~~IC ~O~P~E~
► r . ~
) RECEOU~p '
SPOKANE C~UNTY ~ M ~ ~
JAN 2 S ~DO~
Janu~ry 22, 2002
DI~ISIO~ OF PLANNING ~ P
Ms. Tammy Jones
Associate Planner .
Spokane County Division of Planning ~
1026 V11est ~raadway Avenue
Spokar~e, VVas~ington 99260-0050
~E: Pr~~e~t File ~ ZE23~~1
Dear i~s. Jones:
N1y mother ~ho lives at 14105 East Alki in Spokane is v~~y concemed about her
~ property values and privacy due ~o the letters ~she received regarding the above-
men~io~ned rezone. She and he~ neighbors ar~ very old and want ~he prope~y va0ues,
peace and quiet to remain in their n~ighborhood.
The prapose~ rezo~ne should be approved only upon cer~ain condetions designed to
presenre the neighbort~ood's residential character.
Those conditions should include:
1. Access should not be allou~~d from any of t~e stree~s except Valley UVay and
Evergreen.
2. L6ghting for pa~ing s~ould be design~d to prevent glare and ~oo much light to the surroundang neighborhood at night.
3. Landscaping sho~cld be designed to provide a distinc~ boundary be~reen the
residen~ial area an~ the ne~ office complex. It should be more t~an your
present ordinances call for.
4. The ~ases~ should be rest~icted ta those associa~ed ~rith professional of~ice.
There should be no manu~actunng, outs6~e wo~k, ou~side storage, or ot~er
rnore in$ensi~e uses made of ~he iand.
5. The ~evesoper should p~y for the impact to t~af~ic in the area. That is for road
improvements as well as signals, stre~t trees, e~c. The homeowners should
not have ~o pay for traffic improvements ~hrough more taxes due to the rezone.
We have relied upon the residential zoning of the ar~a to invest in our ~or~e and vue
depend upon the County to maintain the values and char~c~er of our neighborhood.
~Pl~ase add ' er t ose pres, ted ~t the public hearing.
-
Sincerely your~,
Richard S. Symms
Ruth E. Symms
_ , ,
` ~ ~s~ ~ ~ G or~ vb' ~v~' , ~ _ ~va~ ~S' ~u~ c~
RECEIVEA ~
SPOKqNE COUN~ ~ D
. JQV 2 3 2001
s~k~~ co~~
. D~vision of Pla~ing DI~ISIO~ OF P~q~~~~
~ 1026 UVest ~roadv~ay
Spoka~.e, V~a. 99260-0240 lanuary 20, 2002
~ To ~om ~t ~[ay Concern:
~ ~ : Project ~ile no. ZE~23.01 ~ ~ ~ , .
. ~ , Parcel no. 45143.1562 . .
On J~1~ 26, 2000, Ray Ve~ey applied t~ subdivide his 3.54 ac~e pa~cel into two tracts,
i~te~aded for single fa~.ilies. Tbis idea ~as ~'ine witb us. ,
~Ie v~ere notif ed the midd~e o~ December that he no~r ~vanted to ~ezor~e the land to
~ deveiop it all into professiona.l af~ces. ~
~Ve totally reject th~s project.
~en ~he coun~ v~ide~ed Evergreen ~re a~l were promised tbat the east s~de of Evergreen
wo~ld remai~ residen~ia~ ~nly. They Wo~d allow professio~al o~ices on t~e west side.
V~e ~vould hate to see Evergr~en become anot~er Pines or Sull~van.
If you approve this change and ~hese of~ces ar.e bu~lt, it would lower ~he value of our
propert~. The back of o~r house faces south. ~le ha~e large winda~v faci~ south and g
. ~ enjoy ou~ views of the hi~ls. ~4Ie v~o~d be looking at these buildi~gs. He has planned
~ . ~a~~ing lot lights that ~voa~ld sh~ne on our house and yard. The noise of the arkin lot . , p g ~
deli~er~es, a~d dumps~ers e~c wo~ld be a problem. ~s six foot fence would not stop any
~P:, -v~ ~ ; ~ ~ . of this. ~a~le ~ra ~s a~ ~.curb~d lane r~a not ~ntende ~ f r h' Y~ d, d o t~s hea~-y t~a#~c. Please do~e NO on t~.is char~ge.
~ . . ~ ' J.
Iv . t. ~ ~ ~ ' .
o i~ ~
• ~ J - _ •
it ~ I~a~iel E, ~i Linda M. Lafse.r
: = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 14010 ~ Alki Ave. _ _ t .
~ ~ ~ . Spokar~e '~Ia. 99216 , - ,
; ~ , ~~n ~ ~
rF~f ,
i ~i. f~
~
,.~f''~? `ai•., r^ - . . ` ~ P 1 _ .;~~r:~ • - _ ~ i~~- ~ . . , , , ~ ~ fr; a~ ' - ~ v
44'~r~'v,~ y','' ~ :~r, ~ - _ _ t) . _ ~~~-~.it ~ •.Y~1 ' , ' , - -
',+f N~ ' " _ - /LO . h i ~ - - . . _ - - ~ ~~~f ~ • ' _ - ~
' '
. ,
~ , ~ ~ . , -J .
. ~ _ . " n~„^I 91 r 1,^. •li °r , t ~
. .
1 ~ , ~ ~ ~
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONNIENTAL HEA~,TH DIVISION
Inter-office Commu~ication
DATE: ~anuary 22, 2002
T0: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, Spokane Cou~ty Planning Divisio~
FR.OM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHI)
SUBJECT: Proposed Zo~e Change: ZE-23-01 (Veley)
1. References:
a) 1VIap of subj ect, scale l"= 70', by sponsor, undated, received by this office December 6, 2001.
b) CTroundwater Resources and Related Geolo~y North-Central Spoka~e and Sou~heastern Stevens
Cour~ties of VVashi~~on, Depar~ment of Water Resources, S~ate of Washington,1969.
c) Soil Surve~, Spokane County, Washir~~on, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March,1968.
d} Spokane County, V~as~in;~~n, En ~~inee~i~Q Interpre~a~ions, Soil Conservatiori Service, U: S.D.A.,
August,1974.
e) Spokane Coun~ Rules and Re~ula~ons for Sewa~e Dispos~al Systems, January 19,1995.
~ Logs of water ~ells in Range 44E, Township 251V, Sections 11,13,14,15, a~d 23.
g) Map: Gree~acres Quadra~gle, U.S.G.S.,1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S.,1973.
2. Findin~gs: ~
a) This project Iies over the Spoka~e-Ra~hdrur~ Aquifer.
b} The project is within C~tica~ Water Supply Service Area #3 and vv~ithin the service area of ~'era Wa$er
and Power Company. Water supply v~ill be a public syster~. ~
c) The proj ect is inside the Spokane County Comprehensi~e Wastewafier Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, a~nd inside the Prio~~y Sewer Se~vice Area recommended in the '201'
Study. Tbe ~et~od of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane
Coun~y, ,pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted I1~arch 24,1980. The topography and soils in
the area are generall.y suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The t~acts are not
~ ,
~ 1 , ~ ~
of the proper d'imensions to permit the use of both i~dividual wells~ arid sewage systems.
d} The project lies ~n a relatively flat area east of Evergreen Road and north of Valleyway Avenue. Loca1
drai~ageways are insig~if cant.
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loaln wi~h 0% to
5% slopes. They have a septic tan~c filter field li~nitation of slight, There is also possible
contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
fl Greologically, t~e soils are glaciofluvial deposits. Tbese geolog~cal structures generally yield ~oderate
to very large amounts af water. Data from wells in the a~ea referenced in section 1 f shows they are
from 115' to 170' deep and have static water levels varying from 50' to 185' below the su.rface. The
~ Vera ~Vater and Power Company has indicated that it can supply dorriestic use water for the project
upon completion of agreements with the proponent.
3. I~equired ~ma~datory) Co~ditions If Approved:
a~ Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane Cou~ty.
b~ ~Iater service sh~ll be coordi~ated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water serv~ce sha11 be by ari existi~g public water supply when approved by the Re~ional Engi~eer
(Spokane), State Department of Heal~.
d} A public sewer sys~e~n will be made available for ~ie project and individ~al service will be provided to
each ~ract prior to sa1e. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal syste~ns shall not be authorized.
e} ~ien ~he current residence is remove, the on-site se~vage disposal sys$em must be properly aba~doned
per Spokane Regional Health District's Rules and Regulations for ~n-Site Sewage Disposal Systems
for Spok~ne County.
4. Recon~unended Co~ditions of Approval:
a) Use of pr~vate wells amd v~ater syster~s is prohibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsar: Ray ~l eley
20215 N Spotted Rd.
Deer Park V~A 99006
~ • r -
1 . , , .
To: Tammy Jones (Division of Pianning)
C~:
Fr~~n: Jim Red (Division of Utilities~
~at~: i~onday, January 14, 2042
S~ob~~c~o ZE-0023-01 St~ge: Hearing Examiner Phaseo
Ray Veley - Professional Offices
SS~09 A vuet (live~ sewer connection to 4he area-wide Public Seuuer System is to be cons~ructed.
Sewer connection per~nit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or
estimated water usage pr~or to the issuance of ~he connection permit in order to establish sewer fees.
SS~2A Applicant shall submi$ expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cove~",
only those plan sheets shouuing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submi~tal.
SS~ 2F Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the
sewer connection permit.
~5~1 Any water senrice for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane Coun~r, as amended.
~
y ~
1 Z~07-O1 OY ; S~PI~ FROA~SCaPCA , T~1 ~1 P. 03/04 F-130 ,
. 1 , , o
, ~ SPOK~~VE CO~~
~ ,,lr,1, , ~ p~~ P~~~~110~V
~.~RB~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~N~~~ °~a~~
~ _ . z.., , , . . ~ESV t909 tOIIEGE, SUfTE ~03 ~ SPOaAN~, wB~ 992A1 0(5~) ~77~7~7 F~x `309) ~17~~a~
Qate: ~~~m~er 7 2~, 0~~
1°~: ~~~~y, J~ne~~ ~~~n~~~
Spoka~~ ~~unt~ D8Y8~BQB~ ~~~~~~~nin~
~o ~8~~~~~~~~Y~01Q~~ c._.~ a__ . z ~
S~~k~~~~4 992~0
FPom: Ron Edgar, Chi~~ of ~echnic~l Senr~~es
R~: SCAPCA REQUIR~M~~TS FOR;
Fife ~o. ~~2~~9
Pr~ponent f Proj~ct Name: ~~ne ~c~a~~cat~o~ Na~o~„Qo ~R-~21~v~~~a~. ~ V~BI~~~~ ~ _
Q~~chnical Review ~lee~ing on D~ce~ab~r ~~Q 2~~~ ~~:~5 pome
~ The following is a list af concerns~issues ti~aY may n~ed to p~ ~ddr~ss~d for this project as determined from
information received by t~is office, Yhe list is provided as a brief su~mary of general requirem~nts and does not ~elieve t~e prop~nent ~rom meeting all local, ~t~t~, andlor ~ederal regulations, For additional inforrn~~ion or
clari~cat~on, con~c~ SCAPC~ at ~509) ~77-~7~7. Copi~s of SC~PC~ ~~gulatoons ar~ available for p~rchase in
our off ice or can be view@d and dawnloaded from h~tp:/~r~►w ~c~pc~.orq.
~o~~~ct~o~ rol~~~d ~~u,ip~m~o~~
~ Dust emissions during demolitian, cons~ruction and excavation projects must be cantrolled. This may require
th~ us~ of uvat@r sprays, ta~ps, sprinklers, or susp~nsion of activity during certain w~ather conditions.
~ Measures must be ~aken to avoid the depositeon of dir~ and ~ud frotn unpaved su~aces onto paved sur~aces. If~tracking or spills occur on p~ed surfaces, meas~res must be ~ak~n ~mm~diately to clean ehese surfac~s.
a Debris gene~t~d as a r~suft of ~is project must b~ dispos~d af by rn~ans ather than burnong.
~ SC~►PCA ~rongly r~commends that all tr~u~l~d §ur~aces (i.e ir~gress, ~g~~ss, parking areas, access roads,
e~c.) be pave~ and kep~ clean ~o rninimize dust emissions.
~!f objec~ionable odors ~esul$ fro►~ this project, ef~ecti~e con~ol apparat~s and measures mu~t be taken ta
red~ce odor~ to a minimum,
~~do~~n~~ ~ uiP~~~n~ ~ . i.~.' . . ~ ~ . J
~ A Notic~ af Constr~ct~on and Application for Approval is r~quir~d to b~ subm;~ted and approved by SCAPCA
prior to the construction, inst~l~at~on, or est~blishment of ~n aiP pollution source. This includes e~nergency
gen~~acors ~ted at 500 hp ~375 kW) or higP~~r, n~tur~l g~s hea~ing equipment units rated a~ 4~i~8~'Ulhr or
hi~her (input}, and P~eating equipment units fired ~ach ocher fuels (e.g, diesel) ra~ed ae 1 M~i~TU~r (inp~at) or
higher. Contact SC~PCA for ~ Notice of Const~~c~ion application.
~ A Notice o~ Intent m~st be s~bmi~ed to SCAPCA prior to any demoli~on project or asbestos p►ojec~. ~n
asp~stos su~ey rnust b~ done by an AHERA acct~dited building inspect~r prior to the d~moli~ion or
renov~~i~n of ~uildings ~o dat~~in~ if ~sb~stos~on~ining ma~erial is present a$ the site. Contact SCAPG~
for a Notoce of Intenc applecat~on.
U:~R~y's1~EPa1G~N~RAL COMMENTS~ FORM.doc ,
~e ~ PR►fte4 OJ~ l~tyCtCO ~~par
~ c
1 v~ , • ~ •
OFF:CE OF T~E SPOKANE COU~TY ~NG ~EER
~ 026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509~477-3600 Fax ~509}477-2243
~ a s. ~ _ ~ - ~ .'c,~'' 66E~GINE~~'S C~~D~TaO~S 0~ A~~~~VALp9 T~ ZO~E
~ . ~
T0, Spokane County Division of Planning ~
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: December 19, 2001
REC~B~ED
P~OJ~C°Po 4~Rm3.~ ~0 ~Rm2~ ~RO~ESSS~~A~ O~~ICES Spp~(q~E COUN`~
F~LE ~o Z~~023~01
~~C 2 0 2001
TechnicallReview Date: ~~2120i2001 ~ 1 e15)
Plan~er: TAN~MY JONES ~,Ylgg~N OF PL~N~IIdG
Hearing Date: ~
Review Date
SponsorlApplicant: RAYNIOND C VELEY
Section To~rnship Range: 14~25-44 ~
The Spokane Coun~y Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced
application. ~'he following "Conditions of Approval" are submi~ed to the Spokane County Division of
Plar~ning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions an~ OrderlDecision" should the request be
approved.
P~~or t~ rel~ase ag a~~o~ldi~g p~rs~i~ or ~ase o~ proper~y ~s pr~~~se~o
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from th~ County
Engineer.
2. A Professional Engineer ~P.E.}, licensed in the State of 1Nashington, shall submit road and
storm drainage const~uc~~on plans and a drainage repor~ that confo~rrn to the versions of the
Spakane Coun~y Standards for Road and Se~rer Construction, the Guidelines for Stormr~ater
Management, and a t applicable federal, state, and iocal regulations and la~rs that are in effect
at the ~irne of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application~s). The
f na! road and storm d~ainage plans and drainage repor~ shall ~eceive the Coun~y Engineer's
ac~eptance prior to reiease of any Grading, ~uilding, or Right-of-INay Permet.
3. A parking plan and traf~c carculation plan shaii be submi~ted and approved by the Spokane
Coun~y Engoneer, The design, location and arrangemen$ of parking stails shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by t1e Caun~y
Engineer wil be required for any portion of the project ~hich is to be occupied or trave ed by
vehic es. ~
4. The construction of ~he roadway improvements stated herein sha ~ be accomp ished as
approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
CC: Appl'icant RAYMOND C VELEY
Engineer/Surveyor MICHAEL C PHILLIPS Planner TA1~lY JONES
J - H
' ~
Pa e 2 En ineers 9 9 . .
Aearing / Review / 12/20/2001 TR
ZE-OQ23-O1
5. The County Engine~r has designated a Coliector Roadway Section for the improvement of
Valley~vay Avenue v~hich is adjacent to the proposed development. This ~vill require the addition
~f approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of aspha t along the frontage of the development. Cu~bing and
side~ralk ~nust also be constructed.
6. All req~ered improvements shall conforrn to the current State of UVashington Standard
Specifica$eons for Road and ~ridge construc#ion and other applicable county standards andlor
adopted resol~tions per~aining to Road Standards and Stormwater nllanagement in ef~ect at ~he
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Enginee,r.
7. Ro~dvuay s~andards, typical road~ray sections and drainage plan require~ents are found in
Spokane ~oard of Cou~ty Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as ar~ended and are applicable to
$his proposal.
8. No const~ucfiion work is to be per~orr~ed within the existic~g or proposed right of way untel a
permi~ has been issued by the County Engineer. All vuork within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction wi~hin $he existing or proposed public right of ~ray is to be completed
prior to the release of a buolding permi~ or a bond in an amount estimated by ~he County
Engeneer to cover the cost of const~uction or improvements sha01 be f~ed with the Coun~y
Engineer. ~
10. ~The applicant is advised that there may exis~ utilities either undergrou~d or overhead effecting
~he app9icant's proper~y, including proper$y to be dedicated or set aside f~cture acquisition.
Spokane County r~ill assume no financial obligation for adjustments or reloca~ion regarding
these utilities.~ "The applican~ should contact the applicable utilities regar.ding responsibility for
adjustmen~ or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessar~ work."
'81. T~e applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards, ~
12. This proposed zone change has been revievued according to the si~e p~an of record. Any
modifcations in this si~e plan of record shall require additional reviev~ by ~he County Engineer.
~t such time a revised site plan es submitted for revieuv, the applicant shail submit de~ailed tra~ic
information for revieuv by the County Engineer to determine ~hat traffic impacts, if any, that the
deve opment vuou d have on surrounding infrastructure. The app icant is advised that mitigation
maybe required for of~-site improvements.
EUD
0 ~
D~'~~~1~IN~T~~N 0~
N~N~g~NIF~CANCE . ~°DNS99
WAC 197-11~970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SP~I~ANE ENVIRONNiENTAL ORDINANCE
~L~ ~E~a ZE-23-01
~ESC~PTION OF PROPOSt~b,: ~Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (U~Z-3.5~ to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 3.39 acres for professional offices.
~~CE~ N~. e 4S 143 .15 62
~~~-~DATE ~ TIl~: February 6, 2002 at 1:30 pm.
~~L~C~: Ray Veley, 20215 N. Spotted Rd., Deer Park, VVA 99006
L~~A~~N PROP~SA►I~: 13907 E. ~lalleyway Ave., located at the northeast corner of ~he
intersection of Evergreen Rd. & Valleyway Ave. in the SV~~'/4 of Section 14, Township 2SN, Range 44
EWIi~, Spokane County, WA.
AGENCY: SPOKANE COUN'TY DIVISION ~F PLA~G
~]ET~~N~IAT~ON. The lead agency ~for th~is p~oposal has determined ~hat it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on ~he e~viranment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
'~'bis DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); ~he lead agency vdrill not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from ~he date issued (below). Co~men~ a~ega~d~ng t~is ~NS ~ust be su~~i~ed ~o later
tb~~ 5;~~ p.~o, Fe~ru~~ ~~02, ~f tbey-a~e i~~ended ~o ~1~~~ the ~DN~. AJl co~a~e~ts.shou~d ~e
s~nt to t6e co~t~eg pe~on l~st~d ,~e➢ov~.
~SP~NSI~~E OF~ICI~.L: ~y: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
Spokane Coun~y Division of Planning
1026 ~V. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 (509) 477-7225 ,
~DATE ~SS~D: January 18, 2002 S~~NATUI~:
CO ~ R~(iARDING IIVVIR~~At, OONCFRNS ARE T THE HCARING.
~'P~~ ~F ~S I~ETERNYI~IAT~ON, after it becomes ~inal, may be made to ~he SPOKAI~E COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANfNING, l st Floor,1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, V~A 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of t~e decision to approve or disa~prove the project.
Th~s appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make spec~fic factual ob~ect~ons.
Contact ~he Div~sion of Flanning to assist.you with the speci~cs for a SEPA appeal.
T~is DNS was mailed to:
1. ~A State Depa~tnient of Ecology (Olympia)
2, ~~~k~~~Coun ~ ~-,D~ivis~iot~-o.f,En~g'~eeri~g,~~~ra~spor~ation Eng~ineering; Scatt Engelhard~.
3. Spokane Coun~y Division of Engineering,. De~elopment Serv~ces; John Hohman 4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane County Di~rision o~ Building and Code Enforce~~nent, Je~f Forcy ~
~ 7, Spokane Regional Heal~h District; Steve ~olderby
8. Spokane County Air Poilution Conb~ol Authority; Chuck Studer 9. Spokane Transit Authority; Gordon ~owell
10. Spokane County Fire Protection District No.1
11. Vera Water and Power
12. ~ffice of Historic Areservation; Theresa Brum
~ I
~
i ~ ,
i i r
+ ~ ~
Y ~ ~ _
S~ o K A N , ~ i'~ . O U N T Y
DNI5ION OF PLANNINt~ A UIVISICIN ~F THE I'UBLIC ~'~r(~fiKS I)E1',~RT1~Tf~'~IT MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR
~MO~NDVn~
T0: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy
Klmball
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads; John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane Counry Air Pollution Control Authority; Chuck Studer
Spokane Transit Authority; Gordon Howell
Central Valley School District No. 356
Spokane County Fire District No.1
Vera Water and Power Office of Historic Preservation; Theresa Br~im
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE: January 9, 2002
11~ 1FCT~ Review and comments for the hearing on February 6, 2002 ~,1:3~ pm.
~'ILE N4: ZE-23-O1
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential
3,5(UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22} on approximately 3.39 acres for
professional offices.
PARCEL N0: 45143.1 Sb2
APPLICANT: Ray Veley, ?0215 N. Spotted Rd., Deer P~rk, WA 99006
Note that the application and maps ~~vere previous~~' Cll~cul~ted to your a~ency.
~ , ~ ~ , ~ , . s ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ ~
Pl~~~~~ r~~{~~«~ ~~i~cl ?~Ltt~rtl .~t~~~ ~~~~~~11~~~~t~ t~~ T~~~ .l~ii~~~~z'~ w.
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W. BROADWAY ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 ~ FAX: (5091477-2243 . T'~~~ r~~ a~_7~
. , ~ , . , a. .
~ r
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA.RING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex:AMINER
T0: All interested persons, and ownersltaxpayers ~vithin 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEA.RING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOVV, AS FOLL4WS:
Application: File No. ZE-23-01; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 3.39 acres for the development of professional offices.
Parcel No: 45143.1562
Hearing Date and Time: February 6, 2002 @ 1:30 pm.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building,102b
West Broadway, Spokane, V~ashington.
Applicant: Ray Veley, 20215 N. Spotted Rd., Deer Park, WA 99006 5091276-2248
Address ~nd Locatioa: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Evergreen Road
and Valleyway Avenue, in the SW '/4 of Section 14, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane County,
WA
Comprehensive Plan: Urban (U) ~
Ezisting Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the Counfiy ~
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on January 18, 2002. The comment period ends February 4,
2002.
Related Permits: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional permits must be
obtained including access permits, sewer connection permits and building permits.
Divisioa of Planning Staff: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner (509) 477-7225
HEARING EX.AMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolutian No. 96-0294, All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons
Wl~'1 phyS1C~ d1Sab111t1~S.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Planning, l~` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building,102b W. Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m,, weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies
of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Planning,102b V~. Broadway, Spokane, WA 992b0, Attn: Tammy Jones. Motions must be
made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3~ Floor, Public V~orks
Building,1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245.
I I
~ ,
~ o~~ a~ ~ ~~a~N~ c~u~v~~Y r~~~~
~ 02~ W Broa~way Ave, Spokane,llUA 992~~0-0170 (509}477s3600 Fax ~~09~~77~2~~3
- ~
- ~`~~~I~EE~'~ C~~~I~'~4iN~ A~P~~QV~4L99 Tl~ ~4NF
Ta: ~~okane Caun~y Division of f'i~nning
. . ~ ~ FR~I~: Qi~is~an of Engineer~n~ ~ Roads
~ DATE: D~c~~~ber 19, 2Q0'I
~R~~~G~o U~~~~S U~m~2 PR~~~S5~4N~L q~~Y~~S
~r~~ ~d z~-~o~~~o~
~ech~ical~~eview Date: ~'~21~01~00~ ~ 1015)
~'I~~~ner: TAMMY J~N~S
H~~ring aate: c~
R~vie~r Da~e
~~o~nsorl~pplican~: RAYMONa C VEL~Y
Section ~own~hop ~~nc~e: 1 ~1~~2~-4~
The Spokai~e C~~nty ~ivision of ~ngine~ring and Roa~s has ~evie~red ~he a~ove ~~~e~enced
appl~cation. T~e followinc~ "Gonditions o~Approval" ar~ su~mit~~e~ to i~e ~p~ok~ne Cour~fi~ Divisio~ of
Planning for incNus~on in ~he "'Findings o~Fac~, Conclusians an~ OrderlDecision" shoul~ the request be
approved.
~r~~~ t~ ~°elea~E ~ ~~r~ldin~ p~r~i~ ~~e p~~~~~~ p~r~~~~~~~
1. Access p~rr~i~s ~o~ app~oaches ~o ~h~ County Road Sysiem shall be o~~ain~d ~rom ~~e County
~ngineer.
2. A P~ofess~or~al Engineer (~.E.}, i~censed in the S~a~e of UU~shing~on, s~alf subrno~ road a~~
storm d~Pain~ge co~s~~~uc~ion pnans and ~ drainage repo~fi th~t conform to ~h~e v~r~ions a~ t~e
SpakanE Ca~n~y S~andar~s ~or Ro~d and Sewer Construc~ion, ~he GL~icleli~es ~or S~ormu~at~r
~l~nag~ement, an~ all applicable fe~eral, st~~e, and loca~ regulations and I~ws th~fi are in effec~~
a~ ~9~e ~ime o~ the plan subr~i~tal or at ~h~ tir~e of ~he d~ve~o~ment p~er~ni~ applica~ion~s~. The
fir~~l road and s~orm dra~nac~e plans an~ drainage report sha~l receive ~he County ~r~ai~neer°s
acce~tanc~ ~rior ~to release o~ any Cradinc~, ~uilding, or Rigi~~-of-W~y P~rn~i~:w
3. A par~cing plan and tra~~ic circula~i~on ~lan s4~all be submi~ted ~n~ app~oved by the S~o~ane
~ounty Engineer. Th~ desi~n, loca~io~ and arrangement of par~Cing stalls shal~ be in
accordance wi~h s~an~a~~d engineering practices. ~'aving or s~rfacing as approv~d ~y the County
Enginee~ ~vil~ b~ re~uired fo~ any ~o~ion o~ ~he proj~ct ~uhich is ~a ~e occupie~ ar traveled by
ve~icles.
~he construction of ~ne roac~v~ray i~nprovements s~a~ed I~~rein s~ail ~e ac~~ompiish~d as
apl~ravec~ bythe S~okane Coun~y Engir~eer.
CC : P,p~~ ~can~~ ~flYMOrv~ C V~LY
~?~gy?1~@r~SU'rv~~0~ A1SC~.~C'L C PH.r~L~IPS
~lann~~ T~i~MY JO~iE5
Pag~ 2 Engineers ~ ,
Hearing / Review / 12/20/2001 TR
ZE-0023-O1
5. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Roadway Section for the improvement of
Valleyway Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition
of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. Curbing and
sidewalk must also be constructed.
6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of UVashington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved bythe County Engineer.
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
8. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
9. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed
prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer.
10. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition.
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work."
11. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
12. This proposed zone change has been reviewed according to the site plan of record. Any
modifications in this site plan of record shall require additional review by the County Engineer.
At such time a revised site plan is submitted for review, the applicant shall submit detailed traffic
information for review by the County Engineer to determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the
development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation
maybe required for off-site improvements.
END
~ , ~ s
Kimball, Sandy
From: Nyberg, Gary
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:40 PM To: Baldwin, Greg
Cc: Hohman, John; Kimball, Sandy
Subject: Ze-23-01
This property is located within the Spokane Valley and is pre-approved for conventional drainage systems. No concept
drainage plan is required and the submittal is considered technically complete regarding stormwater, Please incorporate
Standard
the attached standard conditions into the staff report. Condition.doc
~
A~ T_ DA ~DITI ~~F A~ PRUVAL ~ A~ C~ S 4. ~
R Z ~ HA~GE ~4. ZE-23-01 F ~E C 4
Prepared By: Gary I~yberg, Dev. Srvcs.
Date: ~ 2/06/01
1. A Professional Engineer(P.E.), licensed in the State of UVashington, shall submit road and
storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of
the Spokane County Sfandards for Road and Sewer Construcfion, the Guidelines for
Sformwafer Management, and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws
that are in effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit
application(s). The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive
the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of any Grading, Building, or Right-of-
VUay Permit.
i
PAGE 1 ~ ~ 13:59:57 07 DEC 2001
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
01170 EVERGREEN RD (START) .000 32ND AV U 14 PAVED 22
EVERGREEN RD .070 31ST AV (START) U 14 PAVED 22
.160 30TH AV (END7 U 14 PAVED 22
.240 28TH AV ~START) U 14 PAVED 22
.320 27TH AV (END) U 14 PAVED 22
. 3 9 0 2 6TH AV ~ START } U 14 PAVED 2 2 ' .500 24TH AV U 14 PAVED 36
.590 23RD AV & CT U 14 PAVED 36
.700 21ST AV U 14 PAVED 36
.750 20TH AV U 14 PAVED 36
. 8 3 0 19 TH A~l ( S TART ~ U 14 L I GHT B I TUM . 2 2
.880 18TH AV (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
.940 17TH AV {END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.000 16TH AV U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22 1.264 12TH AV U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.410 9TH CT (START) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.440 9TH AV ~END} U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.510 8TH AV U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.640 6TH AV ~START) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.670 5TH CT (END) U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.690 5TH AV (START~ U 14 LIGHT BITUM. 22 1.760 4TH AV U 14 PAVED 73
1. 8 4 0 3 R.D A~1 ( START ) U 14 PAVED 7 3
2.020 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 66
2.110 RIVERSIDE AV (END) U 14 PAVED 73
2.17 0 MAIN AV { END } U 14 PAVED 7 3
2.230 NIXON AV (START~ U 14 PAVED 73
2.260 u~LLEYWAY AV ~END) U 14 PAVED 73 2.290 VALLEYWAY AV ~START} U 14 PAVED 73
2.450 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 14 PAVED 73
2.520 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 73
2.580 MALLON AV (START) U 14 PAVED 73
2.640 CATALDO AV (START) U 14 PAVED 73
2.710 DESMET AV ~START) U 14 PAVED 73
2.770 BOONE AV (START) U 14 PAVED 73 2.830 SHARP AV ~START) U 14 PAVED 84
2.910 MISSION AV CONNECTIO U 14 PAVED 84
3.010 BRIDGE # MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 84
3.120 I-90 E/B RAMPS U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 94
3.230 I-90 W/B RAMPS U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 80
EVERGREEN RD (END) 3.410 INDIANA AV U 14 PAVED 80
01171 EVERGREEN RD (START) .000 SOUTH END TO SR 290 U 19 PAVED 36 EVERGREEN RD .020 BNSF CROSSING #54021 U 19 PAVED 36
.110 SR-290 (TRENT~ U 19 PAVED 36
.220 ROCKWELL AV U 16 PAVED 20
.270 RICH (NONESTABLISH-S U 16 PAVED 20
.2$0 RICH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20
.460 HEROY AV ~END) U 16 PAVED 20
.530 WELLESLEY AV U 16 PAVED 20 .850 CROWN AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20
EVERGREEN RD ( END 7 . 9 5 0 SANSON AV ( END FO U 16 PAVED 2 0
01213 EVERGREEN RD ~START) .000 SOUTH END TO 43RD AV U 19 PAVED 30
EVERGREEN RD .110 43RD AV ~END7 U 19 PAVED 30
.200 42ND AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30
.250 42ND CT ~STAR.T) U 19 PAVED 30
. 3 0 0 41 ST A~I ( END ) U 19 PAVED 3 0
.330 41ST CT (START) U 19 PAVED 30
i _ ,
VALLEYWAY AV ~ END ) 1. 5 0 0 FLORA F~~~ • U 17 L I GHT B I TUM . 2 0
05115 VALLEYWAY AV ~START) .000 HARMONY RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40 VALLEYWAY AV .100 MCMILLAN RD ~END~ U 19 PAVED 40
.130 MCMILLAN CT (START} U 19 PAVED 40
VALLEYWAY AV ~END} .320 HODGES RD U 19 PAVED 40
05116 VALLEYWAY AV (LIBERT .000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 PAVED 40
VALLEYWAY AV .020 MCKINZIE DR (END7 R 09 PAVED 40
.080 GARRY DR (END) R 09 PAVED 40
.190 MAIN AV ~LIBERTY LAK R 09 PAVED 40 .270 MITCHELL CT~LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 40
. 3 3 0 MI TCHELL DR ~ END ) R 0 9 PA~IED 4 0
.390 MOLTER RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.050 DUNBARTON LN ~PVT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
VALLEYWAY AV ~END) 1.280 LAKESIDE RD (END} R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05117 ~IALLEYWAY CT (START) .000 LABERRY DR U 19 PAVED 37
VALLEYWAY CT (END} .100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 37
8 Records Processed
. ~
~
• ' DEC 0 ~ 200~
~ .
! ~ ~ ~POKAI~E ~OU~ E~GI~E~R ,
S P ~ K A N E C O U N T Y
DNISION OF PLANNING ~ MEMORAN~SION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR
T0: ~~~~~.yr . . , ' ~ ' ~ ~ , , ; ` ~ ~~d~_. ~"-~~~~v~~~~~~ ~ ~
Enge~a~ , ~ ~mball
Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby ~ ~
Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry, Ron Hand
~ Spokane County A~r Pollution Control Authonty, Chuck Studer
Spokane Transit Authority; Gordon Howell Central ~alley School District No. 356
Spokane County Fire Dis~ict No. l
Vera VVater ~i Power ~
Office of Historic Preservation, Teresa Brum
FROM: Tammy Jones, Planner .
DATE: Deceinber 7, 2001
SUBJECT: ZE•23-O1; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to
Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) on approximately 3.3 9 acres for
professional offices. .
TECHI~ICAL REVIEW MEETING
DECEMBER 20, 2001(a~ 1:15 P.M. .
Public Works Buildin~ lst Floor Conference Room
Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEw MEETING
FoRM for your comments, The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If
you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the
attached form to me for the meeting. The attached ~Cx~t~~AL ~vlEw Fo~uvts will be
given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Pla~nning file. Thanks
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me
at 477-7200.
NOTE: The Division of Planning is circulating the SEPA Cbecklist for comments. This
will be the only time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist
for this project.
AttaChments; Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, Vicinity Map, SEPA Checklist
Copy without enclosures: Ray Veley, 20215 N, Spotted Rd,, Deer Park, WA 99006
Laurie Carver, send second sheet via interoffice mail
1026 W, BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477•2243 ~ TDD: (509) 477-7133
~ f ~ ~ ~
Spokane County
Division of Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: December 20, 2001 @ 1:15 p.m.
Project File No.: ZE-23-O1
Project Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of
Evergreen Road and Valleyway Avenue, in the SW '/4 of Section 14, Township 25 N.,
Range 44 EVVM, Spokane County, WA ~
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Project Description: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22} on approximately 3.39 acres for professional office.
Parcel No(s): 45153.15b2
Applicant: Ray Veley
20215 N. Spotted Rd.
~ Deer Park, WA 99006
(509) 276-2248
Project Planner: Tammy Jones ~
a ~ ~ , ~ .
I~ ~ ~ " 9 ► i ~ y' ~ - ' a3:~s ~
, ~i ~ : r ~
~ ~ C~~N`~ n . ~ ~ REC~IV~ ~
~ ~OV0~8~~D P~A~ Q~NE~ G
o~ ~ ~ ~ ~
j~ ZONE RECQ.ASSiFICATIO~ APPLICATIOB~ . 2 ~ -
- ~ ~ , ~i~1vi510N O~~PI.ti~vr~~Nt~
~~R~' 9
~ ( t :~R ~i, I I ~ ~ ~ i~o`~ . . p -I Ui~ ~J _ p~ r ~ ° ~ ; _1 (i i ti ~ t' I f ~ !r , ~ _ i~t,~. ~ fi ,'t . , f~^ ~ ~ '1~ t ~ 17' ~ ~ ~ M ~ ' °
~ ~ o ' ~ty o~, t ~ ~ . ~ ~ b ~ ' i 1 ~ ~~=~I~~r~i ~ ~ ' i „ L~
A ~IC 'V ~ PP ar~t ~~!`C ~-~~-c
U~ailing Address - ~ ~0 2 t ~ g ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~
Ci~ ~~L l~ , I~~ , State ~64- Zi Code g cl D~ _ , p ~
~Phone _ , (Ullork) (Home) Fax
~ Legal O~rner ~ ~ D~ "T~. ~ ~ i~~(t.~-
Mailing Address C~ ~ v~L~ ~ . _
ci~y ' = P ~A-~. ~ state ~ E~- ' C~L~ 6 , ~ ~ Zip Code
Phone. ? ~Z ~ ~3 ~Work) (Home) Fax
Agent, if different from applicant .
IUIaiOing Address ~
Ci~y S~ate Zip Code
Phone (vUork) ~ - (Home) Fax
Projec~lproposal site area acres or s. ft. ~•~~t~ i~ ~~5 ( ~ )
Adjacen$ area or~ned or controiled (acres or sq. ~t.) _
Assessor's parc~l ~(s~ of ro'ec~/ ro osal ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ z P 1 P P
Assesso~'s parcel #(s)of adjacent area owned or controlled MC~- I~~/'~ ~
~ S~ree~ address o~ p~raposal ' ~ D ~ ~ , ~~C.~~ w ~ ~
Exostin zone classificatoon s and date establish~d V~~~~ 9 _
Exas4ing use of prope~ ~ ~2 e 5 c o zsJ c.
Proposed zoning ~ ~2 ~3~J I~ i2 -
. Comprehensive ,plan~ categor~ ~ School district C~ w~~ ~~~~o ~
UVater p~rveyor 1~~ _ Fire distric~ ~ ~ I ~ , D
Proposed use of property: ~
Single f~mily d~ellings O Duplexes O MuOtifamily dwellings o~ P~~~~ ~c~~c.
Nianufactu~ed~homes ~ ~ ( } ~usiness ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed use ~ ~ ~f`
~ther ~ - Describe c ~ de~ ~4-(, ~ ~
~ List previous planning division actions involving ~is~ property ,
Y '
i ~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATI0~0 APPLICATIO~~ ~ ~ ~ • 1~
PAGE 2 of 5
' - r ..a ~y • ~y ~ C , ~ p ' ~ ~ ~ S~ i~,"'` 1 ~ ~ L N' . k ~ :1 ~ ~ i ~ r E u. ~ ; r. r ~
~ i ~ i ~ ,y.~ f1 ~ r~ - c.~. . .A ~ ,...1'
Address and ~.ocatcon of ~ ro osal V~ r l~~'~-~-~~ Pp
Sec$ion ~ l~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Township Range ~ ~ 1
~arne of public/private road(s} pcoviding access U ~ ~2.U~-~~ ~U_._p ~~c° ~
~ r
1tUidth of proper~y fronting on publiclprivate road Z`~ ~ I~ Vc.°~-~~~~r~ ~lao ~~`~L-~4~
~oes ~he proposal have access to an arterial or planned arteriai? Yes No
Name~s} of arterial roads ~ U~~2 C~-~ ~c~
~.egal desc~iption of property ~o~ each zone~ reclassi~ication proposed
~ w 1 J ~t , ~ c , O ~ T~ ~Yv ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ . n~~~ ~-I ~I ~ ~
`~"l2~c~ ~ ~c • a ~ ~ 2 ~ l - o0 ~
N~- C~ ~-d~.~~- o r= ~0 t/~,~~ w~-~~
Existing ~one(s) v r'-~~' to proposed zone(s~ l~ ~Z ~ 2~' ,
fo~ ~he following described property:
~ (At~ach legal descrip~ion stamped by land surveyor or provide below.}
9f you do not hold title ~o the property, what is your interest in it? ~ x~c v~aZ n
,
V~l~hat ace the changed conditions of 4he area which you fe~e{ make this proposal warranted? r-~,, ~ ~ . _ ~ ~
~ ~~~2 i r~- L ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ReS ~ ~e~-~ i
~~e ~ ~ r~ ~ . - t-~ f ~~~~5 ~ o~o~~ o~- ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~t' ~ ~ y ~ ~N~~ ~d `l ~ ~
C N ~V - r ~C~ ~1 SP ~ (l. ~ `T"iM ~v~S , - ~
Y ~ ~ ~
. f I
, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ANNLICATI~ON , ,
~ RAGE 4 of 5 ~
VVATER PURVEYO~
RCW 36.70 ~ requires early coordination and information . ~
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS V~IITHIN VUATER ~ISTRICT: 1.~~-~ ~a~~ .
SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC VIIATER AND FIRE F~OUV HAVE BEEN
MADE AS FOLLOW5:
,
~ A VUATER SYSTEM PLAN MUST ~E PREPARED: YES . NO O
~ REQUIREMENTS: ~
C. O SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED: ~
, I have view d~ roposa! and have advised ghe ~app~icant of ~he Dis~rict ~equirements.
,~r,2~-~a'~2-o~Fd~~4i ~s-~~ / ~ Z I -el
~ SBGNATURE TITLE DATE
SP0~4AN~ REGI~~OAL ~E~I~~H ~9ST`RIC~
RCW 36.70 ~ requires early coordinafiion and info~natNOn
.A PRELIN~INARY DISC SSION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPL~TE APPLICAT60N NlUST
INCLUDE: 1 ~ ~
~
R. ( ) SEE ATTACHED LETTER ,DATED:
A~er a pr~liminary review of~~he proposal, I have advised the applicanf of some of ~the
Spokane Regional . ealth nequir~ments. A complete and de~ailed review u~ill be provided a~er fhe
application is submitt , which ~vifl r~sult in a co ple~e lisf of nequirer~enfs and conditions regar~ing
F~eal~h pnovisions f ~he proposal.
~ ~ m/ .
~ SIGNATU TITLE D TE ,
_ . ,
~ SE~~R PURVE~OR ~
(Ci~ of Spobcane or liberty Lake~ RCIN 36.70 ~ requi~es early ~ o~fination and information '
A PRELIN~INARY DOSCUSSI4N HAS TAKE _ LACE, A C MPLETE APPLICATION NiUST 1
INCLUDE: ~ ~ ~ S , ~
( ) SEE A~'1'ACHED LETTER DATED:
A~er a pretiminar~ review of ~he proposal, ! have advised the applicanf of some of ~he
Sewer nequlr+e~nenfs. A comple~e and detailed neview wi11 be provided affer the applica~ion ~ is submi~ted, which will r~suf~ in a comple~e ,list of nequir~ments and conditions r~ganding Sewer provislons
for ~he pnoposal. ~
~ ` ~~C ~ (i ~ ~ 01 S _ - _ SIGNATURE TITL€ DATE
- _ .
. '
~ - ~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION • ' .
~ PA~~ 3 of 5
UVhat factors suppor~ the zone reclassificatian?
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan 1~V s~. ~ e_<~ ~~t,~~
~~`~Z. e vl~~, i S~~~ ~1 N~' y l o~ Q(~~
~/~11,~~° i~ ~~~~`H ov Is ~ T~ V~ t 5 N aZ' 1(~
~ ~,~v~ p f ~ ,,c~ ~ c. ~~e s~ ~'u ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~r-~.~: J ~ -~-o ~ ~
Com liance with ur ose and intent of zonin ~~T ' P P P 9.
~1 ~ ~ l ~ ~ `D ~ u ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c`~= P ~.I s't-t ~
~ i' 1N ~ L~ ~ . ~1~',~ 1 L~f ~'f' ~ ~%5 ( Q ~ ~_l"~ ~ 1 1,_ ~ ~ ~ T, -
1~' 15 1~ 1-o W~ 1~~' ~'-~-L~" t~ S~P c~-~ 1..A-r~ D,, .
, Description of changed conditions o~ the area that you feel make this proposal ~rarranted
1~~ R-~'~5~`~ ~~.R' f~ 1~ j/~JV~ S 1~~ ~ f~ 04 U4 t ti c~
~I~'~ 5 ~ ~'(/~C ~ L~~ «'~q~~ ~ ~T ' ~ lJ~ ~
, ~ , c, , .
UVhat impact~ will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent proper~ies? ~12~ ~~'-,L ~
~T~" (3 ~-~.1 z ~ fi J~l.~ ~S ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~o ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~~NN ~ ~ ~~r= >-L ~ ~ ~F?;~ 6 ~ l ~1~t ~v ~ l> 1~ I S V ~-t..
~;r-~L ~Z-c~~+~ I.- A~-dV ~ ~P7 vc.~(~ ~d~ ~ ~ c , ~
~
~~w~e p~°' )0~~ T~.'~ ~ 1~ ~~-L~~ ~ `6~ ~ l B
~ liUhat measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
~~dVC~ Ir- ~-~v1~~ ~-1~ I ~
~ ~
I~ ~
~IRE ~RSHALL i ~BR~ ~ISTReCT
RCW 36.70 B requires ea~1y coordination and information
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS 1~IITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT N0. ~
VVHAT IMPROVEMENTS NEED T4 ~E IViADE TO i~EET THE DISTR~ICT'S FIRE PROTECTION
REQUIREM~NTS?
, . C. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED;
D. REQUIRED FIRE FLOI~ (gallons per ~rninute):
~ ! P~ ~nev~ewed fhe osa! and have advised ~he ap can~ of ghe Fl~e Drsgrict neqtrir~me~~s, ~
I ~ A,
! ! R.~ , ~ ) ~ eP , SIGNATURE _ TITLE ~ ~AT~ ~
. ` ~ ~ ~
5~.,... ...r:J a V
~ ~ ' •'I ~ !
~
. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ,1 ' ~ ~ ,q ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ;
\ ~ ~ p+ r
_ 1* +y
1' ~ ( ~~r+ ~
~ ~
v
RECEIV~D SPOKANE ~OUNTY
~ ~ ~0~~
DIl~Slal~ ~i.~~I~G
. -
, ~ A~ ~ . ~ _ ~ ~
N ~ . ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~
~A ~ ~ S ~ ~ a o2 ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~
4 ~ ~ ~
.
J (
~ ~ -
SEPA. ENVIxoN~~T~. Cx~C~sx
A.C~ 197-11-960 ~
5.okane Environment~ Ordinance Section 11.10.230{1~
. P
PURPOSE O~F CHECKLIST .
The State Environmental Polic Act (SEPA), chapter 4~.?1C ~RCW, requires all government~l agencies y . .
to consider the en~-ironinental im acts of a proposal before makin~ dec~sions. An environmental P
im act statement IS rimusr b~e re~ ared for all proposals with probable si~nificant adverse impacts on P _ (E - ~ . P P . .
the ~ ualit of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information~ to help you q Y
and the a enc ident' .~rn act f rom your propos~I (and to reduce or avoid impacts fr.om the proposal, . g Y ~Y - P .
if it can b~e done and to ~hel the a~ency ~de~cide wh~ether an~~EIS is ~required. . P ~
I~VSTRUCTIONS FOR APPI1CAiV?S ~ .
This environmental checklist as~s you to describe some basic in ormation about your proposa~.
Governmental a~encies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your
•Q Uirin re aracion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, ~vith the most proposal are si~nificant, req g p p
recise information known, or give th~ best description you can. ~ P
You must answer each uestion accurately ~and carefully, to the best of your knowled~e. In most
~ q . cases ou should be able to answer the questions from your o~vn observa~ons o~r project plan~s ~y
~`vithout the need to hire ex ~ eru. If you re~lly do ~not know the ans~ve~, or if a question does not
P a I to our ro osal write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete ans~vers to the questions
PP ~ y p p now may avoid unnecessar.y delay~s later. ~
, ~ • ~ . . . . ~ome uestions asx about governmenta~ re~~ations, sucn as zon~ng, snore ine, and iandmark
~ . , , > - , .
des~~na~tions: t~ris~er chese ues~~or. if ~you c~.n. I~ yoL naWe pro ler~.s, tnp bover-nr:,e~t~; a~~~cles ~an ~ 9
assi~~ you.
The cheeklist uestions a l co al~l parts of your proposal, even if you plan to da t.hem ot-e; a period q PP Y .
of time or on d.ifferent arcels of l~nd. Attach any addition~l i-nformation that will help describe your P Q which ou submic this check ' - ~
ro osa] or its environ.n~ental effects. The a~ency to . y _l~st may as~ you to P P
e:~ lain our ans~vers or rovide additional information re~sonably related to determinin~ if there may P Y- P
be si~nificant adverse~ impact.
USE OF CHECKZIST FOR ~~r'ON P~R~~ECT 1'R~POS~LS:
Com - lete. this chec~ist f or non- roject proposals, even rhou~h questio~ns m~y be a~n~s~ ered "~daes not P . P
apply.'~ ~i ~~DDITIO~, complete th~e SUPPLEyIE~1TAL SHEET FOR NO\•PROJECT ACTIO:~S (pa~t D).
For non- ro'ect actions the refe~rences in the checklist to the ~ ords "project," "applicant," and P l ~ ~
" ro ~ erc ~ or site" should be. read as "propos~l," "proposer," and "aEfectzd geo~raphic area," P P Y
respectively.
Cnn~-~na ~nt-~-nrirrmar-~~ nrr~~n~n~P l.f1eGK~S$t ~a:~ ? QI 7~
vtlvaau►t~. a-44 i v t. v4i1::~....c:t Viuata~••,•••• „
~ • ►
.A... BACKGROUND F~/PROJ~cr No.
1. ~~azne o~f pro,posed project, if applicable:
2. Name o~f applicant:
, . _ ~t ~ C~
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contacc person:
' ~ ` p ~ ~
o~-YG, C~Z- ~ ~ . _ .
,
- • ~ P~ ~ ! 1 ~~1~ ~ ~
~4. Date checklist ,prepared:
:1- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . . . . _ .
5. Ag~ncy reques~ir~~ c~~e~~~lis~:
~T''r ~,,.,/~N 1 ~~r- ~ c~~ I~~ ~ ~~v~~v . ~ P ~ ,
6. ~ Proposed timin~~ or schedule (includinb ph~s~n~, if applicable): ~
/ ~ `~I ~ I h~1 ~ ~p Z„ - Z~O 5 . rv ~~~v ~ r ..~v~ ~
Spokane Environmen~a~ t7r~i~~ ~ce Chec'~list Pa~~ ~ oi ?l
- ~ ~
r ~ '
,A. BACKGROUN~ ~concinued~:
7, a. Do ~ ou have an lans f or f uture additions, e~ansion, or furcher activity related to or connected with t1~is Y Y ~P-
pro.posal? If yes, e~pl~in. ~
,
b. Do ou own or have o tions on land neaiby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain, Y P
o_ ~
8. List an envzronmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly Y
related t~o this. proposal.
t~0~~ -
,
9. Do ou kno~v ~ hether a lications are pendin~ for governmental ~pprovals of other propos~ls direc~ly Y PP
af f ectina the ro erc~• co~iered by your proposal' If yes, e~pla~n. P P ~
C~ ~
10. List an a~oWernrnen~t ao rovals or ~ e: mits that ~vill be needed for your proposal, if kno~ n. Yb ~P P
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Z~~~ ~ ~ , ~
i~ ~ ~ ~ t~ P~ ~-~u~ ~ V ~ ~u `r`rJ ►~-~,L v rv ~ .
Spokane En~ironm~ntal Or~i~.~ryce Ch~cklisc Pa;e of ? I
.
• - :
A►. BACKGR~UND ~concinuea~:
11. ~ive a br~ief, com lete descri tion of your proposal, inclu ~ding the proposed uses and the size of the ro'ect and
P P Pl site. There are sever~l questions ~later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your ~ro .osal.
. P P You do~ ~n~ot~ need to repeat those ansNers on this paae.
~ ~ - ~ ,J u~ c~ C~~ ~ '_Z7 ~o P c~ u~ ~ ~L- ~ 2. y~,~ l~'~
~ ~2- " ~z ~ ~ .
ti.:;.
1?. Location o-f rhe proposal. GiVe sufficient information for a person to understand t~e precise Iocation of our . Y
proposed project, in~cludin~ a street address, if any, and section, townsh~p and ran~e, if kn~o~vn. ~f a pro osal . . P would occur over a ra.a~e of area, ~pr.ovlde th~e rarige or boundaries o the site(s}. Provide a le~al descri , tion,
. P s i t e ~ p l a n, v i c i n i t y m~ a p, a n d t o p og r a p h i c ~ m a p, ~ f r e a sona b l y av a i la b le: W 1~ u Ie you: s h o u l d s u~ b m i t an y p l a n s
required b.y the a~ericy, you ar.e not require d to dup llcate maps or det a l l~e d p lans su brnitted ~ ith any ~ermit
P application related to ~hi~s chec , 'st.
~ ~ , (~tJ~'~' _ ~ _ ~ ~ rl- ~.C~~e~
~
t ~ p ~ ~Oo ~ ~ ~Pr~ 1,,~' ~ ~ oF ~ ~~.C~ ~r~v _ ~ ,
1~ ~U ` ~ v ~ L~~' , _ ~ o ~ , l~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
13. Does the p~roposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive A-r~a (AS.A~)? The General S.eNe: Se: ~►ice Area? The
Priorit,y Sen e: Service Are~? The City of Spo~ane? {See: Spok~.ne Coun .ry-'s ASA Overlaz• zone Atlas for
bou~nd~ries)~.
~ - ~ .
Spokane En-iron.men-Z~~10rdin--::c---A Chec4list Ps~Q i nf I
i "
f ~ ~ ' Evaluation ,For
~ A~ency Use Only
T4 BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRON~iENTAL ELE:tiiE~tTS:
1. EARTH
a. General descri tion of the site circle one): fla~, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
P- C mauntainous,~ other: t ~
b. ~~Ihat is the sceepest slope on the site (a~ppro:cimate percent slope)?
~ a ~ d~~ ~
c. What general ry. es of soils are found on the site (for e:~amgle, clay, sand, gr~vel, peat, P .
muck)~? If you know the classificauon of agricultural soils, specify thern and IIote any .
pr~rne armland.
(~dv b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ `1-~, ~ ~ ~ V (~~o~t tr
~ /~Y~u2 ~ ~1~, e~ ~ c~ ~ ,
d. ~re ther-e surface indications or history, of unstable soils in_the irnmediate vir►:.n.iry?
If so, describe.
- _ _ ~ .
e. Descr.ibe the purpose, tvpe and ap,pro:umaLe qu~nucies of any filling or gra~in~ ~ proposed: Indicate source of ~fill.
~1/I ~ ~ o rv~ ~L ~2:~, ► 4v ~n ~ ~ ' ~ ~ `~"~~2vt~.
~ ~~~~='~t ~5 a I,~t~ t~-T~~~2. ~ ~ l
f. Cou,ld erosion occur as ~a res~ult of cleari~n~, conscruction, or use? If so, ~ener~lly ,
~ escri~be.
. ~
'Sookl~ne E~nviranme~.r~~ ~l ~C~r;~~;-,~~,~P ~C'hP~ki.is~ P~~z b of ~ ~
_ - ~ . v.. . ~ •
3
c ~
~ Evaluation For
AQency Use ~nly
B. ENVIROt~1. IY~IENTt~,L ELE:I+IE~S (Connnued):
g. About ~vhat percent of the site will be~cove:ed wit~h impervious surfaces after project
constructiori (for e~cam~ .le, asphalt or buildings~?
~ P ~ ~ v~. ~C-= )
h. Proposed measures~~to~ reduce or conc~rol erosion, or other impacts to the ~earth, if an~y:
~--~~k~v p ~c~~p 1N cs o ~ ~ ~ ~ S~ ~ ~ ~
2. AIR ~
a. ~~hat type o~f emissions to the a.ir ~vould result from the proposal. (i.e:, dust,
automobile, odors indust~rial, wood.smoke) during construc~ion a~ad when the project ~
is~completed? If any, generall~ describe and give appro:cimate quantities, if kno~;n.
~t~~;~~ ~t~~'6! ~t~ ~ e+V~- ~N ~ T~ v~ - ~ ~Y'
t ~ ~ 1'~p C~. ~~n, I,t~.e~ l,v r-T~-. l~ ~-~Q o . ~
b. Are the~re any of'i=site sources of enussioris or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, ge eral.ly describe. ~
~ -
c. Proposed me~sures to reduc~ or concrol emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
_ _ ~ ~r~. , ~ ~ ~ ~ PP ~t p t ~ c~ S~ . ~ ~ ~3
t S ~ ~ ~~c~,~,. ~z ~ ~ ~ s7~~rroa~,
c- -1---- r---' - - _ , i• ..i , 1• - n___ -
3poKa[le LCl`'ironmenu-l u alna::ce Lnec:tlss~ l~Uv-e I or ~ ~
i ~
. , ~
Evaluation For
A~ency Use Only
B. ENVIRON~ENTAL ELE1~~Ei~iTS (Continued):
3. ~1ATER
a. Surface:
1~ Is there any surface ~•~ter body on or in the irrunediate viciniry of the site (includin _ ~
ye~r-round and seasonal s,creams, saltwater, lakes, ponds-, ~vetlands)? If yes, describe
ty pe and provide naines. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into,
- 2) WiII the..project require any work~ over, in, or adjacent to ~~ithin 200 feec) the ~
described ~vaters? If y es, please describe and attach available plans.
,
,v ,
~
Estimate the amount of fill and dred~e material that would be placed in or.removed
frorn surface ~cvater or- wetlands and indicate the area of the site that ~ould be affec:ted.
Indi~cate the source of ~11 material.
4} ~~1ill the propos~l require surface ~vater ~ithdrawals or diversions' Gi~-e a g~neral
descriptian, purpose, and appro~cimate qu~ntities if kno~vn.
~
5~ Does the propos~l 1-ie cvi~thin a 1G0-year floodpl~in? If so, note loc~tion on the site
plan. ~
~a
.Spo~~~.ne En~~~ironme~~:~! (~r,':~~-,~, ~~,p~l~i~~T r ~ _
~ l~a~e ~ o; , i
' r '
~ ~ o
~ ~ Evaluation For
A~ency Use On ly
B. ENVIRONI~IE~ITAI. F,LE: 1 TS (Continued~: ~
~ ~ .
~6) Does the proposal inyolve any dis,charges of waste maten s to su ace waters? If so,
descri~be the type of ~ waste and anticipated volume of d.ischarge.
r .
~
b. Grou~nd:
1) Will graund~vater be ,cvithdrawn, or will ~vater be discharged to g~round water?
Give ener~l descri tion, u ose, and appro:cimate quantities if kno~n.
g P P rP
~ lv ~
2} Des.cribe w~ste mat~rial chat ~ill be discharged into the ground from septic tan,ks or
other sarii~ta ~vas~z treatment f~cility. Describe the general,size of the sys~ezn, rY
the numb,er ~of .~~ous~s to be served (if applicable), or the
number of ,persons th~e sy~sern(s) are eYpected co serve.
~ ~
Desc~ribe ~ny sys:e~ms, ot~her than those designed ~or the disposal of sani~tary~~aste,
ins.ealled 'f,or thz ur ose of di~scharging fluids belo~v the ground sur~ac~e (inclualing P P - .
systems such a.s~ those for the disposal of storm water or drasna;e fro~ floor drains}.
Descr~ib~e~ the : e_ of stem, the a.mount of m~te~rial ro be disposed o# throu;n. the tYP SY . .
system and the types of ~materials likely t~ be dispose.d of (includin~ ~aater~~ls ~ h,ch .
rnay enter the system inadverrently .thr.ough, spills or as a result of fire~ fibhtir;
acti~ iti~es~ .
\r~~~ii~.~e M rt~•rrnn.ti.....~~1 n~ r'L~~~~:~.~• I~'1hJ ~.A?' ~i j
JAJ t ~ i
~ ` r
. , ; •
~ Evaluation For A~encv Use Only
~3. Ei~1VIRONM~NT~L ELE:ti1Ei~d7'S (Continued):
4) Will any che~micals (especially organic solvents or pet~roleum. ~uels) be stored in above-
ground or under~round sto~age ~anks? If ~so, what t,vpes and quantities of materials will
be stored?
~ ~
What pr.ocective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chernicals
stored or used on site will ~n~ot be allowed to ~percolate to groundwater (this includes
me~sures to kee chemicals out of dis osal-systems ~escribed in ~b(?} a~d ~6~3)?
P P
~ ~ . ~
c. Water Runoff (includin~ storm water}
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm wa~e:} and mechod of colleccion and
disposal, if an ~ i.nclude uantities, if known). Whe~e will t.b.is water flo~v? ~~ill this YC q
~vater flow into other waters? If sa, .describe.
~~i~.~n ~ ~ ,B~ rv 6~I~~ Ia Z D U~ ~ ~
. i Y~-~-~ ~ ~ ~eLD ~ ~ ~ lC~ ~C~ ~S a 1T U~t~~ ~
~ 1 ~-~o
~ t~~~; Z-t~~ Pv~D~ , , d ~
2~ ti~ill any chemic~ls be stored, handled or used on the sice in a locacion ~vhere a spill or
leak ~vill dr~in to surface or -roundwater os to a-storm water disposal system g
diseh~r~ing to surface or ground~vater?
Q
Could ~vasce marerials enter ~round or surface watersj If ~so, bene;~lly describe. b
, r
o _ - ~a ~~D6 d~ !~1 ~l~ _ . ~
~nn1=~na ~n~-~rnnrrian~.,1 (1~.7~:......._,, r`1...,.l.l~~r T~'~~~ 1(1 7 t
vrv& aii%- A..sa, I rviui►a%- tll.tl \..JSl:1:ia 1:LZ: l.l1Rl1114 L. •"j~ 1 v V: ~ 1
i ~
~ ~ 0
Evaluation For
AQency Use ~nly
B• E~R~1~1ME~TAL F.LE►1~dE1i 1TS (Continued):
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water im arts if . , , P ~
any (if the prop,osed action lies within the ~Aauifer Sensitiy e Area be especiaUy cl~ on
eYplanations rel~atin~ to facilities concerni.ng Sections 3b(rt), 36(~), and ~c~2) of this . _
checklist~..
r~uee l~~ ~t~ Cn~~Y ~~a~r ~i°~L~~1.~ , f `t,
~~'~~fi j n a~ ~ n%0 li~~~, _ j c~v~i~, W~ ~ c. ~ ~ ~iG ( ~
~ I ~ToR-~ ~~.v o~r.
~
4. PL.A~iT'S ~
a. Check or circle types of vegetauon ound on the site:
o~ . '?C' deciduous tree: alder, . a~ le~ as en, other ~ P P
. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, p~ne, ot e~r
shrubs
grass
~ pasture ~
crop or grain.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, s~unk cabbage,
other
water plants: ~ater~lily, eelgrass, r-rulfoil,~other
o.th~er types of ~-e~etation
• ~'y~~ , ~~C'~at lund ai-~~ amou,Z~ of re~etatioZ will be rcmoti•cd c~ a~~c«,~.
~~ks-r-v R-~ c~ ~ t~ 12~ Y3 5 l.~J 1 l, c. ~ P ~i~? ~'Vtov ~(J -
~ ~ ~ 1 TZ° L.V I ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~6~ ~-1~ ~
c: List~ th~reatened or endan~ered s,p~ecie-s k_nown to be on~ or near the site.
~
d. Prop.osed landscapi~n~, use of natiye pl~a~nt~s, ar ocher
~me~sures to presen•e, or enhance vz~et~tion on .the site, if ~any:
~12 (i~ G~~~ ~V S . ~r ~ ~ g ~ ~~3 ~ ~5 ~ I ~ C~ ~
~ 1~~ .
~~a~'~-.~v
So,okane E;~vir~nrn~,~,r~,l nr;~~;.,..,,.o rt,,;.~•~~,C~ n_ .
j ..~~..~:.:::.:~.c ~.i►c~1','a~~ 1";1ce 1 I Ol ~ ~
S I I
0 ~ ~ ~
~ Evaluation For
Ajency Use Only
'EWIR~NNIE~ITAL ELE:1~1Es~'I'S (Continued):
5. ANI~IALS
a. Circle any birds and aninlals which have been obse: ~ed on or
nea~r the si~te or ~re known to be on or near the site:
birds: h~wk heron eao~le son~bird.s~other:
~ ~ ~ 5 mamm~ls: deer, b~ear, elk, bea , other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herrin;, shellfish, other:
6. List any threatened or endange~red species knoNn to be on or near the site.
D~~..°_
c. Is t~he site part of a mi~racion route? If so, esplai~n.
. ~
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enha:nce wildlife, if any:
~ ~
6. Ei~ERGY AND 1'~T,~TU~.~~L RE.S4I,JRCES
a. ~~I~ha~t kinds of ene~r~ ~electric, natural gas, oil, ~vood stove, solar) Nill be used
to meet the com Ieted ro~ect's energy rieeds? Describe whether it Nill be used for P P1 .
heatin~, manuf actunn~, etc.
~ ~ fiu ~ ~T" .
~L~cY""2~(. r ~ ~ ~ I b~i~ 1 . _ ,
b. ti`Vould your project ~uzct th~e potential use of sol~r energy by adjacent prope:~ies?
If so,, geaerally descri~e. ~ .
~ d~ (~i k..~~ g~ ~~e ~o ~o~~~ ~~r l.. ~ r~~s
~~e ~ ~ ~ - ~ . .
c_,.~___,, t_..:_,.__ r, r~ n.,;,~
Jp Ul1U [lC LilV IIUlltilefl[,i! v=a!::::.n. ce t, nec:s. ilN L 1~~~ ~ V : :
~ i, o
Evaluation For
Aaency Use ~nly
B. EWIRONMEi~d'I'~I, EL-E:1~tE~iT'S (Continued): ~
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the.plans of ~this pro~posal.~
~ List other proposed measures to reduce or control ene~rgy impacts, if ariy:
~V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~vv~-~ ~ ~ ~ r~re
~~1~5~ ~ ~p~ ~ w~~~~- ~ T~v 1 LDi ~s,
1. ENVIRON1~iE~iT.~I. HE.~LTH
a. Are there any environmental l~ealth, hazards, includi.ng e~cposure to to.~ic chemicals.,
ri~sk of f ire and e:cplo~sion, ~s ill, ~ or hazardous -waste, t-hat could occur~ as a result of this P
proposal? If so, describe..
. , _
~ - ,
1) Describe special emer~ency services that rriight b~e required.
o~~
Propose~ me~sures to reduce or control e~ntitiror..m~.^.t.~? ~
health hazards, if any:
'
~b. Noise
1) ~Y/h~t type~s of .noise e~cist in the area ~hich may affect your proje~t (f~r exam~le: .
t~raffic, equ~pment, operation, other)?
~ C-~/z~dV ~.0~ ~ ~ ~t~"~A~~ ~ 1 ~ r2:~-~ ~S
Ln T5 G~ ~ S~ T~• 0~ ~ ~ ~ c.~ ~ r~~-
N~~T~ ~ ~v~ ov ~ pr~°~T ~ ~
2) ~Y~hat types~ and leyels of noise would be cre~ted by or ~ssociated ~ith the project
on a short-term o~r a lon~-term b~sis for exa~nple: traffic, construction, ~ope:ation,
~ ~ . other~? Ind~icate ~hat ~hours noise ~►ould come frorn the site.
~2T Tl~~V~ ~~-sv ~'T"1 D~ II~ G I S~ IiU~ l l.l.
~ ~'•~r, u LT ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~-oU 1 ~ ~c~~~ r~o~
P~ ~
~ S CS I~~~ 1~ ~,~v l~~ f 3(>~ I L~ p, ,
. SDO~~~ne En~ironr~e.n[:=~1 C~rrl'in^nca ~:h~rkltt[ P~aP I: r,~='~'t
, 'r " _ V • M~~IM~iYr V1~V~• •~~r M4%r a ~ V'I I
~ ,
j p
e ~
Evaluation For
A~ency Use Only
B. EWIRONMENTr~L FI.F.~1~EN~"S (Continued):
3) Proposed measure to reduce or contxol noise imp.acts, if any:
''W ~ - ~/v 1 L l r ~~5 V ~-p'~~ ~ ~
~ V ~ ~ ~ ti
8. LAND ~ND SHORELI~iE USE
a. ~Uhat is the current use of the site and adj~cent properties?
~~1.r~~o~ ~ ' ~0 o'tn ~ln ~-C ~ ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~1"~~ ~ ~c D N
~r-~a.. ~-~ee. ~ ~ ~,v ~ ~1►. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ p~~
~ 6
b. Has the site been used for a~r-iculture? If so, describe. ~
-~~~,1(~C.,~ ~ C ~'~-t ~ ~ ~ 1 r
~
~~1/~ 1~-c.~ ia-~ ~ ~M ~-S e~Q
P~'c ~ ~ ~
c. Descr-ibe any structu'r~s on the site. . ` ~j ~r ~•~J~ i~ % i~= D ~ 1-T-o~ ~ ~ C~~°
d. Will any structures be demolished?~ If so, which? I~ ~`v `r t~ a~ ~ v~~Z ~h ~
6~/1 ~ ~ ~l/~oc~~ ~ _
e. . What is the current zonin~ classificat=ion of the site?
Spok~ne E:~~•~i~ronmental n~:i~;~ :~rP C'har~ 1~~, n___
. _ vs•r.~.~u.v. 1-L 1'~ OI 2 I ►J
.
~m ~ ' A
~ Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only
E1~t,VIRONMENTAL ELE:~S (Continued):
f. What is the current Comprehensive~Plan desi~nation of the site?
If ap.plicable, what is che curr~nt shoreline rnaster p~rogram desi~nation of the site? g.
h. , Has any ar~ of the site been classi~fied as an "environmentally se~nsitive" are3:~ , P
. If s.o, ,speci~y.
i. Appro.ci~matel ho~v rnan ~ eople would reside or work in th~e corr~pleted project? Y YP
. 3 12~~ ~2 v Pv ti * S .p~ ?~i~ /~cvl~ ~ ~P~°. ~~erz. ~ ~v s ~ R~~t ae~►TS ~.1 ~1 b- ~
~i~- t ~ ~P~~~"~~ a l~~i~~ p~~ v F ~D;~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~ o~~ Ye~ _ ~~G~ ^ . ~~C~ ~~~t~~
~2 ~ !~nl~ ~ Gt, t~ r•~ ~ ~ o ~ , ~
~1~ e fr•~~~1 4~ ~3 ~-ti' ~ Y~.~ "~k, ~ e ~ S t ~2 ,
' A ro:Yi~rnatel ho~► rnan eop~le ~vould the completed projzct disp►ace? ~ ~ p
1 PP Y Y P . -t- ~ ~o~~e i~i ~ ~ ~ ~~'s ~ ~ . ~ L., ~-r I ~ ~
~ fi%~N ~ ~'~.e ~~c~~- . ~ 5 v ~V o c-~c- u ~ ~ a ~ ,
k. Pro osed~measur,es to ~a~o~id or reduce ~disp~lacement im~p~cts, if any: P
~ ~ :
l. Pro -,osed measures to ensure the proposal is cornpatible ~vith e~cistiri~ and ~projected P
l~nd uses and plans, i~f an~v: - u~ D~`T~
w~v ~.r~ C~ ~ ~ - W~+~• ~v ~F~~~ 1~.~ ~e.t~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ - ~J s~~-~°~, u~ 1~ ~ T a S ~T~,_ ~e_~c~ ~~1 r2 c~ - ,
b~ Vc~:~~ ~ ~ ~p , ,
~ ~ r r+i 1-1'-- 1~10P ~ 1 n~ ~ 1
~pohane ~,n~•tronmentai Vr~inan~~ t,necx~~s~
.
~ , .
~I „ ' ~1 p .
' Evaluation For AQency Use Only
B. ~~1'VIRON~rrIE~1T'r~I. FJ..F.11r1EYI'S (Continued):
9. ~IOUSING
a. A ro:ci,matel ho~ man units would 'be provided, if any? Indicate ~ hether high,
PP Y Y middle, or lo~-income housin~.
~ °v~ r~~ ~ o t= ~v~ r~ ~~T w~- wou~-~
~.~c c~~~ ~~u~ ~ ~R c~ P~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v
~ ~~i(~ ~e~~~ v~P~- oF~~~~~ -
b. A ro:~imatel ho~v man units, if any, would be eliminate~.~ Indicate ~~hether high, PP Y Y
middle, or low-income housin~.
~ DN~
Pro osed uce or control ~housin~ irnpacts, if anv: c p measurzs to red
I~,~~ ~ . ,
1 C. !~.ESZ~x~~i~rc:~. . , . , . .
a. ~~Ihat is the tal-lesx hei~ht oE any roposed structure(sl, not includin~ aritennas; . . ~ . P ~ .
tivhat is the grinci~ al e1-ter~or bulldin~ m~terial(s) proposed. P
~ ~n~~
b. ti~Ihat vie~•s in~ the im.rnediate viciniry would be altered or obstructed?
~ 1~~J 5 a~ ~-r R. ~ r~~ ~~'~.e ~ 5 D~
vl2 ~ C-~ ~L.-~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~~`! ~ ~ ~
~ ~~L~ ~ ~j
,
Proposed rneasures to reduce or control aesthetic imp~cts, if any: ~
~ ~ o^'~ ~ ~ E ~'t u w~, ~ Y~ 9'Z,~) V ~rj ~ ~C. ~ ~ ~ ~:l~? ~ _
~ ~
'•...,.1._.,... ~..,..~..,,.,...,._._1 r1 - - r`~ __1_1:... ~~oP 1 ~i n~'~ 1
~.J~. + v V 1 . z...:a ::l~ • "
.
! '
Q d
' Evaluation For A~ency Use Only
B. Ei~1"V"dRONMEI~ITAL JE~ti1EiVTS (Continurd):
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
~a. ~`llhat ty e of li ht or ~~1-are will~ the proposal produce% What time of day ~~ould~i~
P g b . ma~ y occur? _
~ C. ~ f~tr ~ R~ ~ s v^~ ~ ~i ~ ~D~ ~uC~~.
t ~1~. ~ ~UC~- l.aT ~,~C~.~-~. ~ 1--~~~~ ~...t ~-r-5 .
~ o - ,oC..~vr~r~~~ ~a~ i ~ 'l1 ~~'r`` ' ~ t~ 2 ~ . ~ ~ r~t.~ _
e ~t'~ .
b. Could li ht or lare from the finished roject be a safery, hazar.d or interfere ~•ith ~ g P views?
_ ,
c. Wh~at e~cist.ina off site sources of light or glare ma,y affect your proposal? a ,
~ ~ - ~ .
d. ~ Pron~s~d m~e~:s~ures~tU leduce. or. ~t~ntrol li~ht ai~~ elare irn~d~~; if a,l~:. ~ .
L~t-~-~-r~, l~ ~ t,~ eov Tt ~~~5 ~ -K- i~~L~-- ;
1 ~ l,c~ t 1. L~t° G~~-' ~ Tv - C~ r' c~ ~ ~
~ C~-I~'T' p~J Y (~?/l~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~1`~ d
12. RECRE~~Ti0~1
a. ~~`Uhat desi~~nated and infor~mal recreation~l oppor~unities are in the irnrrlediate vicinity? ~
,
b. Wo,uld ch~e ro osed ro'ect dis, lace any ex~sti~nb recrea~ion~l uses? I.f so, describe. ~
,P . P P -J P - - ~C.~ ~
C,~~.~.~w, L..~r.rA.w.~.~...~.~~ !\~~1,,__~~•I MnI~IfI1C~ i'~`t. lJl ~ I
~p~t~aiic L,i~i~«v~~~►~ru~:~i vr~:in:~::C:C Vll~tn~a~~ J
j ~ ,
, e 8 . Evaluation F~or
A~ency Use Only
~ ~B. EN~VIRONI~~ENT't~L F.I.E11~E~~17'S ~Continued):
c. Proposed measures to ~reduce or control impacts~~on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be rov~ided b the roject or applicant, if any: P Y P
~ . ~ .
13. HiSTORiC AvD CULTtTR.~i. PRESERV.aTiON
a. Are there any places or objects Iisted on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation rejiscers, known to be on or nen to the site? If so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any- landmarks or evidence of historic, arch~eolo;ical, scientific
or cultural irnportance known to be on or ne:ct to the site.
r r~ , ~ ,
c. Propc~,e?~ I:1`a,;l;; C~ tv TCdUC~ ~i contro~l irnpacts, if a.-~y: ~
~ ~
1 TRA~SPORT ~TI0~1
a. Identi~fy public st~reets and hi;hways serving the site and describe proposed access
to the. existin~ strep~ system. Show on site pl~a~ns, if any.
~~1 l~~ O~d= ~ To T~ ~ ~~z~`l~ p ~
C'1 ,l ~
~=~r~ `o ~ i~~ L-~~~~ d-~-~ ~-~~u ~ ~ - ~
~~5 ~ ~ ~ o i ~ ~ ,
w~ w ~ ~ v~~-t~-~~ v~
f
b. Is site currently s~n~ed by publ~ic transit? If not, Nhat is the appro~cimate dis~~ce
to the nearest transit ~stop?
~ -
Spokane 'Environme~1c~~10, ~in~r,ce Checklist Pa~: I 8 of-? 1
~
~ ~
6► r ~ 6
' .Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
~ E1~tVIRONMENTAL ELEi ~i S (Cantinued):
. .
I,c. How man . arkin s aces would the com leted project have? How many ~vould the YP g P P .
~ ~ = pro~ect~ eUrriinate? . r. -
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ o~~
d. W~ill the prop.os~I r,equire any new roads oc streets, or unprovements to e:cistin~ roads ~
or streets, not includin~ driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public
or ~pr-ivate}. ~
- c~rz~ ~D ~ ► ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
e. Will the project~use (or occur in the immed~iate viciniry o~ ~vater, r~il, or air
transportat'ion~? If so, generally describe.
.
~ 1~~ . f. ! Ho~v m~ny. ~ehicular.:;trips, per.day.would be. generatecl hy r.he c~~nngJetP~i prr~~ec~?. . .
X~ If.~known, indicate ~h~en peak volumes wo.uld occu~r. ~
~ k.~ 1~~~ t~ e~4 r~ ~ t~ ~ P~ Z T~~(~ f P~ ~ -
7 Proposed measures to. reduce or control tr~nspo~rtat-ion impacts, if any:
-
.
PUBLI~C SERyZCES
. ~tlould ch~e proje~ct result in an increased need for public services (for ex~rnple:
fire protectio~n, olice ro.tection, health c~re, _schools, other)? If so, benerally describe. P P -
~ i 2e.. P~v`re~7-~ OD~ ~~nt. ~ r~ ~~.-t rv !~-~2~
.~c.~~o ~ ~~u ~~.~c.e ~t~~c~~~~ ,
~ ~ , ~.~~5 ~ ~G~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ow~. ~ I ~ c~ o ~ ,
~Q ~ t ~ ~ g~ ~ p
~n~:~nP F.n~-~rnn~r~Pnr~1 ~lr,~~,,.,.,,.~ r'~,er1f1~« P:~Q~ ~14
✓v.a~..~v .r.....vs...~4a,~,ial ~:.J~Ull:alltC..~.J►l~.l(~11.7~ ^ VI l
~ ~ , t ' i V
m ' ~ ~ Evaluation For
~ Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRO~II~EI~'t~II. ELEc1ifE~TS (Continued):
b. Proposed rneasu:res to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
~ ~ - Po w ~ L~ ~t ~ ~u ~ ~IG~" l~~t ~~~2
~
~ ~ 7"c~ 7~,. ~ ~ r'~ ~ ~7 . ~r~ ~ . - ~5
~ f ~ V p Y?/l i `PC~ ~i~~~ ~~vc - ✓5~ . ,
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle ut' rre e~ at the site electrici ` atural g., ~water, efuse' ~
seruice tele hone 't sew ~ se tic stem, ot er. P ~Y ~ P SY .
b. JDescribe the utilities that are proposed for the~ project, the ut' 'ry providing the service, and the general constructian acti~ities on the site or in the immediate vicinity ,
wh.ich might be n eded.
~ ~ ~ ~;~5 ~ '~t~.T2 t G i ~ I~--~-~~2.
s s
~J~,e ~ ~ e, g ~ ~ N ~ ~D ffUr~
o ~ t ~ , ~ ~v . i t ,
C. SIGNATUR]E ~
I, the undersigned, swear under the enalty of perjury that the above respo~nses are made truthfull P , y and to the best of
my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willfixl gusrepresenta~ion or willful lack of full d.isclosure
on my ,part, the aaencv may withdraw any determination of non-significance that it might issue in reliance u on chis . p checkl~st.
Date:
Proponent: ~ ~ L(-~ ~ Proponent:
(Please type or pt~nt) (Si~nsture}
Address: City, St~te, Zip:
Phone:
Person completin' the focm: 1 L t,1~ ~ D~te; ~ 1'~ - ~ ~ ZI~D ; ~
Phone: ~ t'{ - 1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C r1 !1 l/' -1 f1 A j. n t~~ r~1 ~n .w.. ~ r1 ~ ~ 1~ - Tl ~1 w
~,~~I% -A«L- A.aIY,L V L I I L I U 11«: vrainance t.-,necxi jsE 1'~ge Zu ot 2 1
i
~ ' ~ j ~ M ~ ~
~
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
~ St - Member~s) Reviewing Checklist: _
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklisc and other pertinent info~atior~ ~
. , che staff:
A• Concludes th~at there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recomme
. . . , nds a deternunatlon of nonsignificance (~DNS). ~
B• Concludes that probable,significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for t
he current proposal and ~recorrunends a mitigated determinacion of nonsignificance with condition
s (MDNS).
C• Concludes that there are probabl~e sigriificanc adverse enviror~nental i~ a ~ _ P cts and recommends
a determination, of significance (I}S).
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
Spok~ne Env~i~ronment~.l Ordin~nce ChPcklis,c Pa~e ? 1 of ~ I
- - - ~
r .
«
~i ~ s ~ ~
i ~ ~ , wc~
4 +
rti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,f r'`~ . ~ .T I.~.' _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ I { ~ ~s ' ( - ) ^ ~ ~ _ ` ~ - . _ _ r.~.~ _ . . _ . ~ ~ -
~~14`~ aIc 1P~~ ~~f~li ~iP 11:~~~t~l~1r; ,~i ► ~~c~~~l ~1 ~ ~I1~'~`;I+~ ~I I ~ ii: I I 1`d rl~l I~ ` ~V~ yltf,~ ~ ~I°!`t~Tt I t~~1:r ~ 1 ~V~I~i~i~~i 1~. ~t,I«~s, 1'.~~,, ~ca~ir~l~~ ~~t►~i~~,~+Fr 1 ~r~~i~i~ ~t~ `r~ {ytla I` 1:,, I~tprFc~Is31
~~x~~ I~~~!~~1'~~!~~~~"~'~ ~ ~~~1'~~ ~f'~+~I~~~"~
. ~
~~~4~~1~~1~1".a~~~~ ~1~~~~~~'~ ~l~~.~,~~ ~~~~~~r~~~ _ . . _ .
~ ~ ~
' ' ~ rec:~ ~i~f ~te~~~~e~ti ~t~k~~tc ('c~~~ia~ ~i~cl ~ ~ ~ ~ '~l~~~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ . ~f .~111I~ ~ ~1~ c~ ~~wli~ ~ .
/ ~ N M ~
~V~~[~~~ l~~t~C~S~ 111 ~I1~ )~{3 4~ +~~`~~+~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ . _ _ _ _ ~ , ( .~~~Q~3~r, ~~~~tir, ~t~:~
i~ ~t~l~rec! i~t~c~ 11~i~ _ ~ c~~ ~,~,~~a_~. ~ ~-..rl'I~i~ ;1~;~~~c:~atic~~~~ is ~3~~~~I~~;~l~l~; ~c~ lla~ i~~c~~cct ~
~~1~1~1i ili7. ~ V' ~ i/~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I~ ~ x io.. _ _ ~ C4~ 41~1~~5,~. r~~~~~ ~
~ 1 1
`l'~~~t ~l~e ~~~~~~iv~cl~l~~~ ar~cl I~~~~~ic~~ r~{~~~~~~~ I~~~~~i~1 ~ts 1~~~v~~~~ ~~~1~~~~~~ ~1~~; i~~~()4r~ ~I~:~'~:Cii~~~~ ~~r~~~~e~~~~► ~~r~~je~~ ~~r~~~
~la~ ~~1~~~v~~~,~!
'~~~~~~~~~~rs~ 4Sj~c~~~iti~ C~c~~iit~y Cc~~• ~~~'c~jec! 1~~e~i~~~~r ;M~~cl ii~~~~~~:~ic~r~ fc~~s s~~ ~~~+~c~~ic~l i~~ ~:'1~~~~~~cr~ l~
tl~~ 5~~~~~~~~ ~:~~t~~~~y ~~~c1~. fces ~~rill l~~ 1~~~e~i ~c~~~t~) ~~~l~~ry c~~~1s i~~~:c~cr~cr I~y ,'~~~c~1~~a~~~
~c~1~~~1y fc~~` j~rc~~~~t ~~~vi~~~~~ ~~~~1 ! i~~~[~c~~tic~trs 1~~~~~ ~ ~~:i~ ~~c;r~~~~~1 ~~c1i~~iiri~~r~~~iv~ ~:I~~t~~~~ ~~~a~f ~er~ll
i~~ll~c~ t~t~~~~~l~ly ~s ~~c~:rt~~cl. 1~~~y~ ~~i~lii~~ ~~~~tf~rta~l~ ~I~«, ii►~ltiicii~~~ ~~i~~r ~x~~ci~~e,~ a~~c:~~:`r~c:rl i~~ ~Ir~ ~~~ll~c~ic~~~ c~~ ~r~ t~v~;rc~~~€~ ~c:c~~u~~~, ~~n~~l 1~~ ~~~~ic1 l~s~i~~r i~~~: ~_'~~,~~~M~y'~~ ;~~:~c~~~~~~v~c:c c~~ ~1~c; ~a~~c~.j~c~!
~i1in~. ~ [~~`c~~j~~t is ~j~~~t~c~v+~c! ~t~cfil~~r ~~~:c! wi~l~ ~i l~~tl;~~~c:~c ~~iEl c~~~a[~ti~;, ~I1~ ~Ill~lill[~ ~d~flc~llC~' SI1~lI~
~~~ir1 ~~t~~1~ii~ 3(} c~~~ys ~~f ~~~~rc~ic:e clsrl~~
~"l~~ ~~~~c1~:r~~~r~e~~ ~~~;~~ees ~1~~~~ 11~~~.~~ I~~~.~ ~r~~ c~~~~ ~~a~l ~~~}~a1a~~ ~1~~~~~~ II~~ ly~l~i~~~; ~s ~~~c:c.~f~~~i
~z~~~~r~.
3. ,~~~y i~t~~~i~e,~ i~~~~ ~~~~~c1 ~~ril~ti~~ ~I{~~~~ ~a~ Il~c; ~~~v~~~~:~ ~I;~I~; ~e~ill 1~~ c~~~i~~irl~~~~cl ~Ic..'~III(~ll~:~ll. alll,~'
c~~~~s~{~~~clit~~ la~~~~~~~:e c7rt Il~c ~t~:~:~~~~~~~1 ~~~r I~~i~ ~~rctij~:E.~ i.~ ~t~~~ ~~~ii~l k4~~11~~~t ~l,~}~~; r~C iii~Fc~i~:~ c~~~l~~F
fi~E~~lti~r re~~e~~rs c~~ ~l~e ~~~c~,~c~~;~ c~~~~Y~~~~t~:~~l~ ~~r~ll I~c; cc~~~~l~~~:~~cl «~~~il ~lf~: ~~~~i~~ ~c:~ca~ii~~ ~,~31~i~~:~ i~
~~~ri~l. 1~r~y t~~[~zitic~ ~~~r ~1~~ ~cc~~~~i~1 f~~~~ ~~~zici ~vi~liiii cl~~~~.~ ~I~~: ~~f~~ni~:~ ~~~t~~~
rest~lt i~t l~~~w1 ~»Ii~~~b ~~r li~~ ~~~ili~~l~~~~~ ~}~I~~~ r.r~l~e~~i4~~~ ~~c~~.~cl~~r~~, ir~~l~itli~~,~ r~~'+~r~~~' ~
c~~11~~~~~~~~ ~~;+~1~~~. '~'l~+e ~~~c~~~~~y~ ~~~I1 Ii~~l~1~ fc~r ~N~~ ~k~~~~ ~I1 ~x~~~:~~~~~ i,~c:~~rr~cl l~y l1ac~ ~`~~11I~~~r f~~r
~1~~ ~;«ll~:i:~i~~~~ ~~f c~v~:rcl~i~ ~~~~:c~t~~~l~.
~I. '1`1t~, ~~rc~~~~l~~~ l~illiiw~, ~1~~~~~1c1 1~~~ ~~r~l I« ~i~~~: s~I~~~i~~i~~is
, . ~ ~ ~~~vti,,
~ ~~~~~~~~~s,~; ~ ~ ! , ~ ._._3_-~____
~
~,'~'I'~~", ~'1~1~"~~i r. . . _ P._--- -
2:I~' ~ l~ . . ~ . T _ . , _
i}~ ~~~rt~~: ~ ~ . . __~._Y ~ _ .s_
1 unclers~and Ilu1l fai1n~~~ lo pay (hese fees 111'ay result IsI dcl;jy i~l co~i~~p1ction or approv~~l of the pro,jccR or odler
possil~~~ sa~lclio~ns.
n if Oil's Cee agr~~~lucill is comp1c~ed hY Someoele o1he[' 111an 111c. Spow,(ar (i.e., (lii: pr() ,jecA (mmc:1- (11~ 11
principal iil t1ae [ii-iit ~~~~~~~soring; (~~t: pro*cc:i}, sucli as 1~ie f:lit;iltie~~- designing (Iie ~~ro.jec(, tli+~~l
wrilieir aul1ioriza(icaii fr'mn r1tc Sponsc~~~ specifically ;rufhovizhig glie Agleiif to execuRe liiis Fee
Agi-ceiticiil is aluac1~ed I lii; Fec Al),1~~~~~~~ia.
{~i
ATUli} t~9 . lly: r__.__ . ~v _ ,.-.z _ , ~ __.__a__~_ , ~ +~I+~I~~
PA-
C, v`, (PRil'i NA M F)
!I Et '1'Ll It N 1'I'~LLO W~f-e0 l'Y.'I'O S N-.~K A 111~~.C~.~I~N'11 Y_ F? I'~~~I N If!", I t s
WMagiccfec,dac 2I1196
1026 IV Broadway ~~~e S~~~~iume WA 99260-0170 (501),156-3600 F f1X: (509) 324-347H T1)ll, (5119) 3211-3166
.