PE-1241-78 & ZE-161-78
r ~
~
THIS SHM MIIST BE RETURNY, WITH THE APPZICATION
R D ~CEIVE
• File No:
0 ig76
Sec: 3,3 Town: Range:
C 0 U N TY ~INARY PLAT COiV1CE
PL~~f,'f~!ii~~ DEPARTME~'
CHECKLIST FOR
APPLICANT'S NAME:
aDDxFSS : ~ `1803
PHONE : `12 4- 3 7.s'7r
IHE FQLLOifING DOCDMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4CCEPTANCE BY 3'HE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FOR HEARIlVG BY THE PLANNING COMM I,SS ION:
a.l FITLL PREMIMINARY PLAT FEE ($195 . 00 +$5 . 00/lo t: maximum $750.00 )
p.r PLAT A.PFLICATION (EXHIBIT A)
~r LEGA.L DESCRIPTI4N (EMIBIT B)
~ ENGI:NiEERS SECTI CN M..APS (2) ( EXSIBI T C) (PA )~Lc-/c `
ASSESSORS SECTIaN MAP (1) (MIBIT D) (10 wti F rz sr~l i~~~
PRELIMINA.RY PLAT MAPS (o) ( EXFiIBII' E)
~ r~'ca. 2 blackline copies
b. 4 blueline cooies
EKVIRaVNENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHIBIT G)
.
-a . . .
.
ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES / ~ " ~ ~ .o r y 6 . ~
~t i.
STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS >
T2-;` SEWAGE STUDY REPORT
, PLANS
~3.
UniQUe Environmental Features:
`
l` staf f )
Cultural Resources:
( staf f)~.tCGY~ o rl rn k.t A . 41 ~6 tiu Gul-CLr-
14 ~
.
5. C QvXIlVTS :
TOTAL ACRE.S : '4 NUMBER OF LOTS :
Thia documenti must be returned to the Plat Adminr.strator at the time the full
application is subaitteci. ~
' DATE : 7 ! v - 7 ~
Plat Ac'.m;.niszrator
DATF •
V
• ~ Current Plannir.g Ad.min~ strator
r - -
r = 79 0178 . .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOiCANE COUNTYr WASHINGTON
d
FINDINGS AND OROER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION,
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION; ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SU8UR8AN.
WHEREAS, The Spokane County Platting Hearing Examiner Committee did, after
public hearing on November 30, 1978, take ection by motion that the preliminary
plat to be known as VIGUE's ADDITION (File No. PE-1241-78) be Denied, and,
WHEREAS, Tom Slade, E 9803 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington, did request
a special hearing before the 8oard of County Commissioners to present evidence
and testimony against the motion of the Hearing Examiner to Deny the above
described preliminary plat and zone reclassification; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners did hold a publit hearing on
January 15, 1979, to constder the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner
and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested
parties; and,
UHEREAS, At said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those
opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification,
the Board of County Gommissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the
testimony given, the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner, the environmental
checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted
themselves with the sjte and vicjnity in question, does hereby find that the con-
clusions of the Hearing Examiner were generally valid and sufficient and that
should the Hearing Examiner Committee reconsider the proposal, the Board suggests
consideration of the plat with Single-Family Residential zoning.
NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the
preliminary plat to be known as Vfgue's Addition and zone reclassification up-
grading to Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Subut-ban should be and hereby is
Denied.
DATEO TN I S OAY OF ~rd 1911•
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RAY W. CHRISTENSEN, CNM.
~lR~-~-K~
WRY M. U1RHED
ATTEST:
VERN4N W. ONLAND
Clerk of Board
.
By :
09
PP7 . ~ •
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING )
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISiON AND )
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION )
PE-1241-789 VIGUE'S ADOITION )
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL ?0 ) COMMISSIONERS DECISION
AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR )
TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL )
Sponsor: Vigue )
This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington to rencler its decision concerning the request of
Phil Vigue, 11408 East 37th Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 for the above
captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification; and
The Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee having heard the above
request on November 30, 19783 did deny said application; and
The Board having conducted its own public hearing on January 15, 19799
at the request of Tom Slade, East 9803 Sprague, Avenue, on behalf of
the sponsor, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and
The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based
upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence
available to the 8oard to uphold the action of the Hearing Examiner
Cflmmittee (denial) as set forth in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner
Committee Findings and Order of November 30, 1978.
The 8oard referred the matter back to the Hearing Examiner Committee
for consideration of the plat with Single Family Residential zoning.
The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order,
for execution by the 6oard at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more
definitively the Board's action in this matter.
BY ORDER OF THE 60ARD this 22 day of January , 1979.
UERNON W. OHLAND
Clerk of oard
r
by:
Ro nne on ague, Deputy erc
The above decision was rendered by a
majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners as set forth below:
Larned aye
Kopet nay
~hris n aye
Ro anne Montagu4Deputy rk
a . °
t
~ .
5POIKAM VALLCq IrlPtE DtPAPtTAtNT
4-510 G~ Ao"w ,a• . A/
EAST 10319 SPitAGIE AVE. • SPOKAWF, WASHINGTON M06 0 TECEPHONE OM 928-1700
~ 111w, Novembe r 22, 1978
Mr, Dayharsh, P1 anning Di rrectvr
Spokane County Planning Commission
6roadway Centre Bui 1 ding
~ Spokane Wa. 99201
Bear Si r:
The following preliainary subdivisians & Zone classification
~ for upgrading has been reviewe r fire protectian:
1. PS-1240-78 Chesterfield 1 on
ZS-153-78 Bonuccelli
,
. PS-1241-78 Vigue's Addftj~n I,
ZE-161-78 Vigue
d ~ .
8E PE-1242-78 Simpson's gnd Addi`' ion ~
ZE-162-78 SimPson '
.
4. PE-1243-78 C1 awsop's"Rdoi V? n; u ;
ZE-163-78 C1awsott ~
JAfternoon
~ ~
1V
.
. 1. PE-1244-78 SUnnyvale Acresl, . ,
ZE-164-78 Fogg NflV 2 : 81978
2. PE-1245-78 Pratt Additian . plAlVNlryANE CaU
NTr
Z E-165- 78 Ni grenberg DEPA RTMEN*
I
3. PE-12 ,46- 78 • Ja rvi s Eas.t,• .
ZEY'66=7$. Curry
Mains & hydrants need tQ be Installtd in th'iS area,. Access plans
fqr f i ref ig hti ng equi pmenti -around tht bui i c#tng, shal l be apRrpved
proir to building premit issuance.- - -
r''~~ ,
.
~-r A1 Cook r lt. of Inspectors
1~ !p
n~
~ PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES
QE- 114 i- It
. .
3 3• ~ S- Li q
GcDx
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ M I
HROA.DWAY CEN'.i'RE BUILLII'tG N. ?LL JEFIT,I~i'J SZTRFET
PHONE 456-2207,
Y . ~ ~ - ♦
ISPUKANE. WASNIIVGTUN 0~260
VU. a Ht l.li I. _.NT w,' yMEMORANDUM
QS~o. Co . Nt~t~~n ~cP f. C3~ 'L15flS C rey. o40 0 !ap a~~ )
To: ~~~~h A~: Tm Tus~s q~,o: 6 i<<1%*4y
p Nu~ C+e+y. o~'.~ Q~tade,( ~rr'g, ~►°s f. #
4 #4 ;To b Cs°esrA
FROM: Spokane County Planning Departrnent
ilorth 721 Je f ferscr:.
Spokane, WA. 99260
(509) 456-2274
Attention: WAl~ t/
REFERENCE: Lead agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Starf
Review, Environmental Checkl ist, rnap; al l or some of wnich
are attached.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a
division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING
AGENCY, is the LEAO AGENCY for the following project:
0~'s ~.°4 ~ oa
i
This determination was made in accordance with WAC 191-10-220.
Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be
an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) ) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE
(wAC 197-10-040 (3)
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro-
vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declara tion of Nonsignificance was
issued on /k L), ♦ 147 . Please respond, if appropriate, at your
earliest op3ortuni; , but no later than the public hearing scheduled for
The subject proposal or action (I5, 0~) LOCATED WITHIN THE SPOKANE
VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ANOTHER AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT TO THE
AQUIFER. Please advise us as soon as ossible as to whether you feel
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS~ or a Ground Water Impact Eval-
uation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole
Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should
be prepared.
Enclosures
' FILE r#- -*AC-12 1//' 7;
viG►cce s
;
r...,.
.
L-A ST.~ REVIEW UF ENVIRONME~tTAL• C ~iEt,?~TST
„
.
:-30
, •7atir ..C N'~_ . A' ~~SC
I, In accordance with the Spokane Coun~y Environm?ntal O!-dinance and WAC 197-10, ~
an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent.
This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
.
by t h e-j:rAA',*hWE G~~t,vV J**Nit//Nfy► DAri977
The following data briefly describes the proposal:
A. Action (s) Requested: wo'O'Zone Change; ✓Preliminary Plat
Approval: Final Plat Approval; Cnange of Condition
Other:
B. Descrlption of Proposal: jKQbiWti#Av oA 4ejr l,vro /2 L•TS
,~A~ !I✓o Fi¢~~/ lt~ ./~LSO r 2~E .~Etc Ar,s *r~i ~~Ti i~v F.l~i~
/~'i~/~k ~ nGtf ?v 0IrAft-&Tss0E •sa0jy0il" 04 t7v A90-ofta,11 .
C. Location of Proposal: 4ot*TE6 i&-222V so&s.r,v 0i0cr oF noT s~,~vE
VAL t 6►4 i~ rAAE Qht€~'.IP of 4t 6A sV VWE F, w? Cvew"m.c j7"!`'4 AW.
&VA 6owAis W .
II. Review of Checklist:
A. Slight adverse imoacts are noted under the follow:ng ques tions :
(1) ✓ Earth (8) t/Land Use (15) V Energy
(2) ~ Air (9) Natural (16) v Utilities
Resources
(3) ~ W3ter (10) Risk of (17) Human
Upset Health
(4) v Flora (11) ~ Population (18) Aesthetics
(5) ~ Fauna (12) ~ Housing (19) Rec.
(6) ~ Noise (13) v Trans./ (20) Arch./
Circ. Hist.
(7) ✓ Light & (14) ~ Public
Glare Services
~ ♦
B. Potentially significant adverse irapacts are noted under the following
questions: ~OA14C
C. Discussion of imnacts iCentifiP,,i above: 410,VW
III. Conclusions and Recommendations:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, t:ie staff:
A. ~ Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts
and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance.
B.Concludes that there are no potentially significar.t 3dverse impacts
and, because of the nature of the proposai, recornmends/issues a
final declaration of nonsignificance.
C. Concludes that potentially signiiicant advsrse impacts do exist and
recommend s/is sues a declaration of si-gnificance.
IV. Staf` member(s) reviewi ng checkl i st SToES'E1'
.
. ~T ti • l ~g
.
F •
L
! • SxaO G
i~►r' : ~
ENYIRONMEN?Al CHECKIIS L,
~1' r
.
' c('o~y~~'.on: The Stata Envlronmental aolicy act 3f 1971. Chaotef 43.21C. RC4. reflufres atl stata and loul ?overnmental
a~arlcie3 to consider envlrornmental vaiues both for their own nctions and when 1lctnsing private oroovsais. Tha 4ct aiso
r*auires !hat an Envlronawtal Impect Statee+ent bt vreDartd for aiT ma,7or 3cttons signlfiuntly (anc 'aav*rsely". as ler
JAC i97-10) affec:ino tne 4uaifLy of the onysicil ef+virona+ent. The purpase ot :Ais checkitst ts to nlep ±ne agencias in-
volvea aetererine whecher or rtot a propasal is sucn a major actlon.
2lease inswer d►e `ollowing auesttons as cumteuly as you can wtth the infon+stion ansentiy available to ycu. Please, insktr ~
;uest:ons as "yes" or "mayoe" 1f. in your opinion. even on'.y siight invacts wi11 rtsult. The reviewers of :ne :Aazk;;st .0711
aware of and concen+ *reaeselves rith the devree of imac:, askinq you for more infonnatlon. i* necessary. 4Aere explanations
of vour anstirers are -evuired, or Mr►ere yau bee an expianacion would De holoful to qoverrnr+ent decision-nakars. Includ• rour
axDianation in the saace arovidea. or us* 3dalt~tonai aa ~s. sf meccssar~►. rau should includa retarencss ~ arty revort5 or
stuaiea ot +~+icn you are awaro arM wtilci~ aro rre evaT nt :.o tne answers you p!rovide. Canoiesa ensr+en u, *1►ese quescions ncw Nill
neip a11 ayencles 1nvoive4 witn your prooosal to :u+dK:ake the reQuirea envirancental revlew wtcnout unnecessary :elay.
,►se tailowinq questtans aoaiy ta yaur _ocal proposal. not just to the ltcenss `or whtcn yvu are currtntir ac01yin9 or q+e pro-
3osal Eor wnith ao7rovet is saught. 'lour ansvlrs shauld inCIu4Y t!t! 1AOaCLS wniG61 will D* c3used 7r y0ur Drooesal unen it 1S
coapletsd. ever+ thavqn canoietlon aay noc occw uncil sanecime tn the !uturt. This Mi11 ailew 211 of thr agencfes whicn ,+i11
:)e lnvolved to Conpieta tneir srtrtrone,enr,al revie,+ nor. rithout Cueiicating aaoamork in the fuwre.
Ko ao0lfcatian snaii tie arocesssa until the checkitst has been canolets4 aad returned to Ue .1poroartatt Caunty UparG.7ent.
State 'aw rtqulres exalanspa+s `ar =very "•,res" and ' ►ar" answer on sne cr,etkl ist. The aemcr co~oiettnq •.ne forw +nay ~
revu~rea to oroviae sxD~dnBtlOnS =or no" an~ers. an~in soe+e cases. nvre cetaiTed inlor-iaticn ta aia in a :nreshold
1e terrti natt on .
IQTs: Th1S iS a stanaaro *Crin 138ireq u5ed Dr all StatQ ,Ad 1Cta1 aqencies tin t!1! St3te of Ushinqtan fDr raf tOuS :ipeS 0f
proposa I s. "tany af :he quasci orts +nny not aoo i y:o your prooosa 1. I i i cuesti on aees not aoo 1 v, jW: inswer t t' no"
ana :antinue on co :he next cuestion.
r~I.VYIROlWEi(TAL CHFCXLIST FORM
. BACKGAOUliD rA 1 V•
~ . Name at Rroconenc: + Pekne +iumoer
2. AaCress of Proponent: 6 cl-• ,P••_ / /J r~
3. 3ate Checxlist Suamit:ea: .
j. ;qenty ;evuinnq Chetki tst: ununt-_V ~14anni na
Nw* Or Pr2pO5a1. 1f dppli[IIoit:
5. 'fatur3 ina 3Mef Dascr-vot.on or' rne 6ror)osal ;incluain4 .,ut not itantea :o ics s1u, g"trei lesicn eie+eats. ana
utner `,it,:ors :het mi1 'i giva an accurata unazrscanaing vf its scope 3na nawre}: 4 9__a r- rA
~ ~ -
subdivision
N
.3citlw of °rooflsal cescri0e t-he OhyS1C3I set_tng of trte aroaosal. as -vei1 af :he t+cLent of _he iand area if`atCtee :Iy
iny :nvircrtmen.3: fmcdc:.p. 4rttluatnq anY otner 'nfornrAtlon ieeae<i tD give an aCLsrace 1.1110trzt3r►alnq oe tM _nv1r_n-
rer+cai :et:~ng 3t tne orooasai?:
Between Bowdish and Skipworth iust $outh of 31th Ave.
d. =s:iasateo 7ate *or Coa+ol!t10n o{ ttie ?rooosat: 1 vear
:zst of :ii ?ermit5. Licanses or Govarrnnent 4oprovais Reouired 4or :ne ?roaosal %feaarjl. scate ano tatai - inc:uotna
-emnesl:B. of C. C. accer)tance of plat
t iF SPaCE FOa ExPtanAfIOn cs tNA0E(?JATE. DUASE arACI~ Aoot7TOM aaGZT.. )
10a. lo you, ar the owner in th• evenc you do noL ow+ t!N! SNbjtCL lana. nave gny otans for fucun aadit1ons. exaansion. cr
`urU+er acttvity relace4 Lo ar =annec'.aa wiLmi :nis Prwosal' ►t /es, axDi+tn:
!~n
;00. :o you own or nave oottans on 'ana ntsrpy ir idjacent to 'his crooasal's ?ocstton? :f -ies, exalain: NO
11. Do yoar knor of sny 3lans tIy othars jcclucinq :he cwner w++-tt+ wy affatt tht proaer!y cc-rereo by your OropoSiI or land
id,facenc or nearcyt :i les. axalatn: No .
2. Attacn any ather iapticitton `oczn rZet has bew comoletad reaerafng :'te proxsai; 'f -ione nas ~r_n coaoleced. out is
exoet_ea ta be fileo it ;ome ruturc dsu , cescrfoe the neture of sucn epolicailon form:
--_4YIRi1TiMEHTRI iMPAC'S
(Expi&nations oi al1 "yes" end "maybe" answers are rezulrea) r_s vnvCw. ;e
1. eerth. AilT the proposai resuit in:
(a) l;nsubl• earch cardlttons or tn chanyes `n geolaglc strvctures? . . . . . . . . . _ x
(b) Oisruectons, dfsolacamu, cnmoattton or overcovering of the sail? X -
iC1 l.hariQQ 'n tODOQr3phy Or -,TOUnd SurfaCe rllilf `eatures? . • • • • . • • • • • ~ -
(d) 'he oestructton. :evertnq or modlficaLion 2f 3r.y unique geologic X
:r 7nrsit31 festur!s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . - -
. . . . . _ -
'aj 4ny incrwast in winc or water arosion 3f soils. eitner in or ot° :he si:e?
~
IF SPACZ COR CXPIANAi 1311 'l5 iMAOEOUa7E, PLUi$E aTTAGH AOaI i jONJ'iL r~AGE5. )
:hanges in Ceposition or ervsion of Deacn sanCS, or :hanoes tn siltation,
ceaositlon or erosion wMch nyy roodify tAe channel of a rtver ar strtam
or the bed of the ocaan or any bar. inie*_ or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction of new homes dnd roads wi 1 1 pVP_rnnvpr cni 1.
Slight modifications in existina taDOqranlly maX or eA~a „~P
this is on-a hillside (slope at site est, to be 3-5%) ~t ts
likely that 3uring construction a small amount of erosion will occur.
;ir. Will the Proposal rasult in: Yes MaYb! 40
;a) Atr emisslons or dotsrloretlon of aftiont s1r qualiLy? . . . . . . . . . . .
;D) The creaiton of oafectlonaDle odon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
;c1 Alttration of air +mvement. +noisture or taeperaturs, or any change in
tlimate. elthar loG)ly or rEqionally? ~
During and after construction, motorized vehi 1_s wi 1 1
be on and abQut thP j2r Tr-,r+-y
aater. ait i the prooosa i resu 1 t 1 n: `►es Mavoe rvo
!al Change In currents. or tne caurse or dlnction of wattr -mvewrts.
1 n e1 ttnr aari e+e or fresh wt ttrs 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~51 Chu+ges fn absorptton ratei. drainige patten. or th* rab arM
aaount of suriics Matsr nnwtf? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IL -
!.ci Alterntions to tre caurs• or fla+ of tlood .aurs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
;(1) Chane?e 1n tne smunt of surfaee wacor 1n ar►y water boay? . . . . . . . . ` ~
(e) Olscnirge tnte surfeu wacer. or in iny alteration of surfaca ti+acer
vuality. Inclu4ing out not 11a1ted to tenperawre. 4lssolved
oxy9en or turbldi tyt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(f) Atteration of the alrectlon cr rate of f1aw of qround *iatersi i X-
(g) Chan9e in the awntlLy of gourtd y+atars. etgntr chrougn dlrect
aaaftfons or xitharawats, or :hrouqA fnterception of an
apulter by cuts or excavations2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(h) Decsrloretlon in qr+ound water quality. efther throuqn dir•c-:
tn3ection, or throuqh tht sleoaqe o{ leacnsce. DnoSOites.
Cetere3ents, ioateroorne vtrus or bactlria. or other Suostancrs
into th• gounQ watlrst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reauction in ch• anaunt of water o u+en+isa araitaDle 'or
Dudl fic ratar suapi ies7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
New hames and roads wi11 s1iQht1y mnd3.:F3;__=bS,Qr.on ra+-
:-treet st:orm drainaRe wi 1 1 mor3i fZz Pxists now.
aV'
31 .hangs In che dtverstty of ;aer,es. or nuroer of any soectes a= -T ---i--
`iari (inCluQtnq tT!!f. ihrUDS. Sm55. =POps, aftcrof;pra ina
3vuattc alants)1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
=eauctton of tne rtumDers of arry unique, rare ar enaartgereQ
soec!es of florat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n
_ :itroduction of new species of flpra inta an area. or
~r+ X ~
i barrler to che nornial reqienishnent of existing speclest
Ra4uc:lon in acreaee of any aqriculturai crm? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
.1oianatlon: Kew----" hQmes c,~i~l~lt}r~? desire vecietatiorl ar2purtenant
=euna. Aill :he aroposai resul". in: i`s 4.dybe No
'0 Chartges in the atverstty of soetles, or numoer of any specSea
of fauna (birds. tand aninais tncludinq -tptites. rtsh anC
sncllfish. Denthlt orgtnfsws, irtsetts or mfcrofauna)' . . . . . . . . . . . X
;a; ?eoucLian of Che nuaoefs of arty unique. rtre. or er+danqered
sqet i es of fsuns 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
;.c) Introduction vi mft :peCiQS of faura fnto an area, or r_snit
t n a barrl er to the mi grati on or -movewc of fnunal . . . . . . . . . . . .
d) Dfterioration of axistinq flsh ar wildlife haDltat? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
=xoianattan: om c antre in diverGity of ani ma 1 l; fP may bP Px? prted
as a result of homcs. sn _ci a 1 Ly roden~ var i Pt-; tns _
vo, st. Iles "'nyoe No
i) W111 tne oroaosal tncrease exiscing noisa teveis? . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
_XOlandc»n: Auurtenant to new housinQ,
Liant 3nd Glare. Yes yavoe vo
ia) Jilt tht Orooosal p►roduce crtw lignt ar giare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2- ~
_xntanation: POr'Ch liqhts and street lightinct will sh _d-snm, ~
Ii'qht on the area.
2
r
~ i
►
.F SP^'4.Q F'JR EX➢LaNAT.OM IS iNAOEQI►JI?E. QlEASE AT':.tH A0L. .-JNAI. PA6ES.
3. ! sna Use. , 1es 48ybe K°-
;a1 Ai11 :he aroposal result in cne nitaracion vr the preSML or
v 1 anned t ana use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E.xalanation: ~ .
~p 'ti ,t„~,.-~,I~ . ~ _ .
9. !latural Resourtq~,. will tfie prooosal rtsult in: ys l~ b ya
(a) Inrnass in the rats of us• of any natural ~owusl . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
(b) Oenletton oi srty nonrenaMaoie natural rescuru? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
giplanation• 10. Rfsk af Uoses. Ooes the vrovosal involve a rti3k af an ezoloston or the aL !Raybe vo
re1last o{ haZarOous SubstanCts (1nCludlnq. Out nat limittd to, oit,
p"titldss, chaotuts. 3r radtation) in the event ai an iCCident Or X
upset tonattlons2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ExA 1 aruti an :
11. !opulation; res Mevtie No
Aill the oroposal aittr the locatlon, distrlbutfan, density, or grvwN
rate of cAe Aunan ooAulatton ot an aro1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
"txplanatZan: New .dup.La3ces rLill likelv- attract rcrrtry!~e- to the
vacinity. S F
12. Hous, ~q..
Wi11 the arooosai aifecL axisting houstnq, or create a ee+nanQ for
addttionai housinq? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
~„~x ianatia±: Proposal will add new dwellinQ units to thp area.
I1
'r3nSOOrtitiGn/C'y-culailon. aill :h! Of'OpOSDi *eSUIt in: Y!S "b
(a) Ge++eration of aadittonai ventcular movewt? . . . . . . . • • • • . • • • X
(b) ff!ec•rs on existlrtq parking tacilities, or adRand for naw Darklnq? X
(c) Iavect Lpon existinq transporuczan systeecsd . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
_
(o) Alteratians to present aacurns of circulation or movenaent
of aeoole ana/or gao4s' . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
. ` ~
',e) Alterattons :o wauroorne. rail 3r air traftic2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
;f` :ncrease in :ratflc nazaras Lo ;aotcr veniCles.
aicyc:isu or 2eaestrians7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:xoianac,on: New property occupants will have personal automobiles.
te. Puottc Services. Aill tne prooosal nave an eKtct joan, ar ^esuit 'es "ayee 'lo
in ! n!!a fOr nllw r- ai terea Qovlrnmintai SQrv1C8S in 3ny Of
of the fioiiowinq areas:
;a) =Ire arotectlon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
(b) ?oiice Orocetttan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
(c) Schoois? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
(d) perks ar other recrtitionai faclltttes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(e) hSaintenwce of Pub1ic iacftitles. fncludinq rads? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
( P) Othrr gnvernn+ental ;wv`ces2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
cxplanatian: NE?W homes wi 1 1 reQUire the above publi c services.
;;F SPaCE FOFt EXPUWATICN :S t(VWEQUnTE. QLE,45E ATf,1C14 J001TIONAL :)AGES.1
15. "cneraY. Wilt the arooosal result fn: ys yavae yo
(a) usf ot suasranttal munt: of Owi or enerqyt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
(D) Oemand upon eclstinq sourus of enerqy, or recuire
the Qevelopiaent af rte++ sourcas of enerqy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C -
kp lanatian: Durino and after construction. _ the new homes wil]
require existing enerqy sources, i.e. power, oil and/or qas, etc.
?5. Uttlittes. dfiT the proocsal nsult in a aeed for new systams. (es Maybe
ar alterattons -o the followlnq ut111t:es:
i a ) Power or natura 1 gu ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
lb) Canpmtution systdma' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
f c 1 'siat!►1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
;11 Sewer or seocic canks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ -
'e! Storm watsr arainaQs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ -
3
1E.15E aT'TACN AODITOHAL PAGES. )
( fF SPACE F4R EJ(PLl•NAT;ON :S :iVAOEQUATc. 9
;f) Solid r+sste and aisoosal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
Exalar~fcion: The various utility t3istricts will nPed to modifv
their sYstem, t0 accoxttodate he rieW rPAi HAnnrm_s
res MsYDe yo
17. Hu~en !~Galth. ~allt the Proposal result 1n the crtatlan of any health hazsrds
or aotenclaf neaith haZard (excludlnq -nental neaith)1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
Explanation:
18. Aestt+etfcs. W111 the proposal resul t in the oostructlon of any scenic vista or
vierr open to Na publlc. or wiil the proposal result in the creaticn of an X
aestMtlcally offenslv sita ~n to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explanatlon:
19 .ivrmi on. W 1 t 1;nt aropos a 1 rss u 1 t 1 n an 1 apact upan the Qw 11 ty o r
awn[1~y of existing recreattonal opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
:xoiartation:
20. 4rcheo,~logical/Historical. +lill the orvoosal resuit jn an aiteraticn of a Yes "aroe N
stgnificant arcneoloqical or niscoricai stte. strucwre. abject or Duilding?
Expianation:
: I I . 5 t GlATt1RE
1. the undersigned, sr+ear :u+der the ptnaity ot per)ury tAat the ibave responses are raQe truthfuily and to the
oQSt Of Aly knOMled9l. 1 3150 utldl/'St3RC 'haL. Sf10U1G L!t!r! 68 3AV wf11fU1 m15reflreSMLdt1011 0r Mi11fU1 laCk o1
full dtsclosure on ary Da R.SDOkane County -isay withdraa any Oeclaratton of nonsiqnificanct cAat tt might issue in
reifance upon v+is tnecklist. D~ ~ j•,/, ~
~aca: P 3, - 7 ~ ProPonent:
Pitast PM nt ar Type)
3,-aoonent: Homestead Construction Address: Route 7 SDokanQ 99206
~hOrtt:
P•rson _welecing farm: Tom Slade a►,or+e; 924-3759 oate: P '30 - 79
Oeflaraaant or +}ffice oi County Revie,+ing .'hecxlist: & /r4vjp## le
SWff Meepertsi Revie+,rinQ {'.hecfclist: ims lrcp 40
I
. I
4
J
►
~ ~ . ~ •
i
~
, SPu,.ANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Offi ce Conmuni cati on
Date: ~~~ember 15, 1978
TG: Spokane Countv Plc-innina Convnisaigr
Fi~O.'bi: Euqene C. Prather, R. S.
SUBJECT: Praposed Preli.minarv Plat - VIGIIES ADDITIOAI TO GHESUR _
1. RAference : Our memo to /ou,~(dated September 12, 1978, subject as
abave.
2. The following is added to be a part of paragraph 4 of reference
above :
"r. TrE dedicatory language of the p? at will state that each lot
is authorized the use of an individual on-site sewaae ctisposal
systam."
sel
c: Senski and Assoca.ates
East 9723 Sprague
Spokane, GlA 99206
R E C E
' V E
NOV % 0 i918
SPOKANf COllNiY
PLANN'NG pEPARTMEN
T
SCHt}--ADM-11 8
I
f
~E C~G `
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT _ ECE I vE Inter-Office Communication
SEP 2 u 19i,0,
Date: Sevtember 12, 1978
iV~'Y
T0: Spokane County Pl~in SPOKANE COU Commission
FROM: EuQene C. Prathe . R.S. and Dennis K. Kro11,~R.S ~
SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminarv Plat - VIGUES ADDITION TO CHESTER ,
1. References:
a. Map of subject; scale 1" = 100', by Senske & Associates, dated August
7, 1978, received August 8, 1978.
b. Groundwater Resources and Related Geologv, North Central Spokane and
Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Resources,
State of tdashington, 1969.
c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the
Spokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208 Water Resources Study - Metropolitan
Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975.
d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service,
U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation
Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974
f. Logs of wells in Townships 25, Range 45, Sections 27,28,29,32,33 and34.
g. Field Survey Report, Dennis Kro1l,Spokane County Health District, August
21, 1978.
h. Map: Spokane, S.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Topography, soils and water.
a. This project lies in a relatively flat area west of Bowdish and south
of 37th Avenue. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located
over the Spokane Valley Aquifer.
b. Surface soils are classed as Springdale gravelly sandy loam with 0 to
S percent slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of
slight with possible contamination of groundwater.
c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and
gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated
glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked
by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts
of water.
SCHD-ADM-118
VIGUES ADDITION TO CHF"~R
~ Page 2 • September 12, 1978
d. The data from wells in the area shows the wells are 120 to 220 feet
deep and have static water levels varying from 90 to 140 feet below the
surface. The highest total nitrogen level was 1.3 ppm in June, 1975.
The Model Irrigation District #18 has indicated that it can supply
domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the
developer.
3. Impact discussion:
a. The plat sponsor has proposed 12 lots on 4.5 acres with a typical lot
size of 135 by 92 feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water
system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises
the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area
and possible alternatives for sewage disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater,
and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley
upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment
effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
Al1 the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the
groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion)
are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater
and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are
known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken
up by plant robts," will be less than the total found in septic
tank effluents.
"The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow
line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentra-
tion expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per
liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The
forecast year 2020 maximutz► incremental concentration is 101 mg/1
above the natural background." "The analytical results of
the forecast impact of year 2020 when-cnmpared with the present
impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids
concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality
is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level."
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content
of the groundwater as in the range of 1.3 ppm. A projected incremental
increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range
of 1.4 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit
up to 10 ppm.
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that xaould not recharge the groundwater
have the following general characteristics:
(1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface
waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more
to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology.
These systems are not currently economically available for this
project.
VIGUES ADDITION TO CHE`9R -
' Page 3 ,
September 12, 1978
.
(2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora-
tion for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than
a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have
safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community
acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally
more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields.
4. Recommended that:
a. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat
of record and/or attached sheets as noted.
b. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the pre-
liminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to
the utility companies, County Engineer and Spokane County Health District.
Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received
prior to the submittal of the final plat. (NOTE: The first sentence
is superfluous if the easements are shoi-m on the preliminary map as
required by Ordinance Chapter 5 and 6).
c. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment
of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer and
Spokane County Health District for approval prior to construction and
the f iling of the f inal plat.
d. A plan for water facilities adequate for dasestic use, domestic irrigation
use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier.
Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district
and the appropriate health authoritiesa The health authorities, water
supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior
to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the
plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately
satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will
be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
e. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on
a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule.
The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli-
cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements
will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health
District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser re-
fused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily
complete the approved water system.
f. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The
public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities
and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this
plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic
water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of
each lot."
pal
cc: Senske & Associates, Inc.
E. 9723 Sprague, WA 99206
Pacific Northwest Bell
September 12, 1978
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: Vigue's Addition to Chester
Dear Sir:
Pacific Northwest Bell will not require utility easements within the
plat of Vigue's Addition to Chester.
a
G. D. Fleming
Right-of-tiJay Agent
North 904 Columbus Street .
Spokane, Washington 99202
GDF:bh
R E C E I V E D
qg SEP 13 1°78
~7~
~A SPOKANE COUNTY
~ ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•
i ~
r ~
v 1 ~j
Seweragc Alternatives - _.S~.ei~ir~~- ~~•~~E«.r.~.s+.~or LpC~~~FptA~l~' COUNTy
a"V G D ErY10l 1 IUI 'L![,,
lots O00 gallon per day
/22S I.,. f. drain f ield
Trr.ee alternatives for sewage disposal will be analysed:
(1) 4n-site septic tank
(2) Community septic tank
(3) Community package treatinent plant
(1) On-site septic tank
Capital costs ao
i2 @ 7S0 $
Annual costs ~
Pumping @ 3 year interval.s $ 2¢4 -
nra in f iEld r_ eplacement @ 10%/yr 72p =o
Total O& M annual costs $ 9~0
(2) Community scptic tank
CaAital costs
(Est:. ) /OoOo gaa lon tnulti-chambcr
tanlc instal]_ed $ ~000 °O
Lift station with appurtenances ~000 r°
Drain f ield @/22S L. f. 34 75°°
8" sewerage 1 i ne 3S"O L. f. @$ 6°= 2800
a manholes @ $ 864 1600 00
Z C1e3r1 Ollt @ $ ¢00 800 °O-
Loss of 0 lot
$ 3¢ 8 7S
Anntial O & M costs
Pumpinq ( Est . ) $ 75-0
nrain f ield replacement 370 D°
Periodic line c].eaning /oo e:p
Electrical & pump maintenance 0,00 =
Total 0 & M annual costs $ /O e-O
-i
►
~
Aoo A)
Page 2
(3) Community package treatment plant
Capital casts
Lift station, aeration chamber,
clarifier and chlorination chamber
with necessary appurtenances ~ 2~000 ~
Drain f ield
8" sewerage 1 ine Z8o o°O
Z manholes / lvo0 ~
o ~
Z cleanout 8,0
Loss of Z lot (s) 000
$ ¢88 7S
Annual O & M costs
Pumping clarif ier $
Drain field replacement
Periodic 1 i.ne cl.eaninq
Electrical, pump and tank maintenance
Total annual O& M costs $
The following table summarizes the costs associated with the
three alternative sewage waste disposal systems considered:
Annual Cost/tJnit Capital Cost/Unit
On-site septic tank $ 80 $ 7.50 °
Communa.ty septic tank I3¢87 S°
Community package treatment plant 382 00 ¢887 s~o
T~.cI,CS _7741/E
~ NR
~l►~ - oF N►
o
IV
.
• :!A .4 'i 't t ' . ..t.'R,~. ; -:yN - - _ ,~.•r, _
t . - - i,., s - " ' . . . - ' . • _ . - ' . , _ , _ . -
~
~UG 3 0 1y78
Legal Description
For SpOKANE COUNTY Job No. t j~8 PLAM~'I~lG DFP,~RTMENr ;
August 7, 1978 `
. The South one half of the South one half of the "lortheast one quarter ~of the Southeast on quarter af the Northwest one quarter except the1'.•, kEast 20 feet and except the Plorth 25 feet; T
And the Southeast one quarter of the Southeast one quarter of tml
PJorthwest one quarter except the South 528 feet and except the East
20 feet in,Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 East of the Wil-
lamette Meridian, in Spokane County, Wdshjngtan.
0-05
0///Ys wasy,yc
t;
CL- :
~O~ R 12606~~~ j ~
, Fs~, FGist~
' /~~AC LAN~ S :
-
. .
'AC
d
v
d ~
r ~
f
. ♦ . ~
. . + • ' ~ • a r
. ~
,
Legal Description
For ~ ~
Job No. P±, j ~y
August 7, 1978
The South one half of the South one half of the illortheast one quarter
of the Southeast on quarter of the Northwest one quarter except the
East 20 feet and except the !`lorth 25 feet;
And the Southeast one quarter of the Southeast one quarter of the
PJorthwest one quarter except the South 528 feet and except the East
20 feet in Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 East of the Wil-
lamette Pleridian, in Spokane County, Washington.
~C~ V . D
c
,
WAs,y,
,
~o,~, 12606
~IN
tv
A
' 1 aa rJ '-1 . 1 ~
1
PLAt~`tE11tG ~~PA~T~E~~
,
,
EIPT Dcte_ 19~ 0523
REC
Received From.._._-J
.
~OressZ, ~-L-'Dofl rs ~ ~
st§'c
For- ' •
&
aCCOV►vT NOw PA10 ~,ppKqNE COG~i~~I~Y PLANNING DEP,ARTi~'£rTT
AM1_ OF CASh ~
ACCOUNT / ~ 7AMT. PAiD ~ CHECK ✓ IO •~'~'U
6AlANCE OROEit BV~ . ~
OUE
~
8K806 a.asrire
~ ~
e
r~
;
I
E X H I B I T A ' ' • . PKELIMINARY PLAT APFLIGAT?'CN FCMM
ALL STM&"L'= MM_ 149~ (CN PACF•S 2 AND 3) MQST HE FTLLED IlN, IF AP'P'ROPRIATE, BEFORE &ETtTMING
TO =M==*MOR-
Part I- To be•completed by applicant and eurveyor
fl.iM KN1r ~J.~7~Vtt~*IU~tf~~~~~fl~~~Mr#i~f~~tt~R~~►~t~ri*ftllr~ft~kfi~~i~t~#i1~#!~~l~M~l~Ml~*~R~*~~~~~~kM~tr**iM*#iMiM~
7
Tatal amouat of laad in this Subdivision: AW Acree Total Number of Lots ~ I
1,)Proposed density of the Plat: 2.68 Lots/Gross Acre
3.~ Toial smount of ad j oining land caatrolled by this oraier or spoasor : None gcres
Proposes IIee of coatralled adjolIIlIIg laad:
4A What i s the dri ving di s'tance in mile 6 to the ne are st fire atati on? -
Shoppin,g facilitiea? 2.0 miles Municipal Bounr3ary: 3.0 miles ved street or
hignvay 0 miles ?
IAND II~~~~~~~~~s~*w~r*~ss~~s~r~wt~sM~~~►a~~~s~a~sssaa~s*s~~s~ss~s~sr~*ssws~s+s~r~s~*rs*s~~~+s~*es~•
. , ~
S/Indicate t,he proposed lsad use of the p1.at: Siagle Femily Dwellinge C~)•
Duplexes C4V). Indicate lot6 fcr duplexes: _
Multi-family dwelling unitB ( Indicate w3LCh lote:
Mobile Homes ~ Other ( Describe other uses:
6'.)Desc-rilie any r.on-residential use proposed in the Plat: None
7.)What ib the preseLt use of the property proposed to be platted? Vacant 4.96
List typp oAl uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres.
Timeer: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres
80s keeping of animals desired? No Yes ( Type:
~ **srsc~t~~s~sss~s+~~s,ss~~sa:ss~~~~~ss~*~*r~f~«*~+******rrf~~ss~~~*~~t*ryr*ssers,~si~ss~sss
Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or w~:11 it be a mui.ti-phase deve-
lovmeat? rile in entirety. ,
_
r6, To ~rhat level oi ~mprovement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimum.
~Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( Paved only C X).
Describe any combinations of above: ,
What i8 the time period expected i orecomplete developmeni of t~he Plat: 1 year
Street improvemenzs caapleted. y . Substazitial aumber of lots occupied" I yea ~
1., Is dedicatioa of aay land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc. )
No. ( x). Yes ( Desaribe: .
15.llndicate the size of vmit8 paropostd to be constructed: 2C)D9 Square feet
~Number of bedrooms - Estimated Sele Price .
lf)Will buildinga be built aaz the lota before they are sold: No C x)• Yee C
f~.Will aay special deed restrictions be included in the eale af lota? No Yes ~
-,I= "yes", ezplaim: UrirILITg•.g*.w~~~~sw~rwsss~~+~*rssf~~~~*+~~s*~ssss~er•ww+~~sw*ry~s~~~*+s~ss~s~ss~+~~s~ss~wss*s.sssar
CO) Indicate the proposed meth,od of Bewage disposal: Beptic tank Lag'oon C
,
Treatme3t plant ( Other, or combiaatioas (Describe)
Zndicate the proposed source of water sugply: Iadividuel arells ~ Public system
~ Pri vate c•,mmur;t-y s3stecd ( ) . -
18)Indicate method of ezten,ding service to the lota (~tellingB) :
IInderground uti ~l...ty easmeate Overhead utilitv easements (
Utilities in streets ( No easements C
Ind=cate the distance from this prqpossl to the nearest existing water Qain: ` J- fee t
Indicate size of aearest mea.n: r- incheso
-OvER-
E X S I 3 I T A
PRELINiINARY FLAT AFPLIGATI0N FORi ( Continued ) page 2
• (Continued)#*'"s*ss~ss~~ss~sssss*ss~s~s~M~s*ss~~~tsrsr**s~+r~~*i►~~**rws.~~r~w~~ss~;~
Liat utility companies or districts expected to provyde service to this Plat:
Electricity : IN . 11 . P. • Gas : Water : Phone : P • N. H .
A.riKNvwLr•~~GKWM*~****#+tsi~~►#f~#+~#+kfttf#~f~fss~i*~~#~~s*~w~si~RS~w*#liaiaM+~#sf ~A~s~s~s*s!!~sl~~+~~i~~tsala~t+l~
riAi 1YA1E' . ~ ✓ J ~ !J
PROPOSM '
I, t,he undersigned, have completed the i.nformation requested, and the Prelim' a,, Plat has
been pre by me under my supervieion in accordaace wit,h the requiremeats of the Spokaae
Cona - partment aad the larrs of the State of Washiagtin.
• '
" (SigGed) Date•
~c~,. °F i4S~~%;. - ~-r~-f..•- 1 ~ ' I ~
(,padra8$) 9803 East Sprague Ave. phone: 924-3759
~ 1260 s .~Q Spoka ne , wA Zip ; 9 92 0 6
~fGtstER~°
~
I, the un.dersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are
aa,de truthfullp and to the best af my lnowledge. I fur.ther swear that I AM THE OWNFR OF
BEC08D of the site prooosed as the preiimi.nary plat, or, 4-f not the owner, attached here-
with is written permissioa from said oxner authorizing my actions oa his or her behalf.
I also understaad, should there be aay willful misrepresentatioa or rrillful lack or full
disclo6ure on my part, Spakaae Couaty may rrithdraw any declaration of aon signif:.caace
that it might issue i.a reliance u is checklist.
(S i~ed) j Date : ~ 7 7e
(Addreas) Phoae : -
.
Zip •
NOTARY • `-t Date :
NOTAEY SEAL:
...*..*......►.~*..*..•«.....~.*......:...~.....*...***s.....~«*«.:.~....~.«...;...*......*...~..
Part II - to be completed by rrater purveyor
A. This subdivision (is) (44p•iwt) situated wi.thi.a our service area.
B. We are (able) (nQ~ aad 'wsllin$ to suPPly this subdivision with adequate water for
(domeatic ) (fire ) ( .J wi~ed. ) uses.
C. Satiefactory arrangement (have) ( ) beea made to serve this proposal.
D. Sigaature (only rr3ien items A, 8& C are true aad complete►d)
► -
e 'gnature and title date
~
1
w*~~*~**~As~i+''~~+~'*+~~~lr~~M*Nf~~*~Mi~t*~M~My*~#M~M~M*~~~~R~M~Mr~M~s~~~~~~s*wRis~~~~=~s~RSt~sM~ss~#l~RS*is*s*i
~ Part =-ta be camleted b7 :iea? t.h District
;f~
A. Health Distr~ct staff-bas conaleted a field iavestigatioa of tr.e site.
3. Healj,h stric cre ..nts foor =-e? i'.r.ar* plats have been satz~sf =ed.
r `
~
n c a'`-'f G - ` i ~ c~ , •
~
si ~re and tle
i~lfti*+r~ss*t*~~* M+~~sa~s~~*i+t*s►~is~~~~~scYS~w~r~s~r~wsa*~~f~sss~~r~sis~s~**+~s*y~►s+~~s~~w~~rs*s~s~+n■
w ~
~
. •
E X H I B I T A
PEIMIMMARY PLAT APPLICATI0N F08M
(Coatinued) Pge 3
~a M~~ls~~~~~~~~i►~~yM~Mwy~~~M~sM~*~rr*~M*t*~f~*siw~+~~a~«~**Miktrfw~~~~~r~~~lr~~tr~w~~t~~**1rri+~*s•
Part IV - to be completed by Couaty Eagiaeera Office
A. County Engiaeera 4ffice requiremeat6 for preliminary plats have (have nat) beea
satisfied.
8. Sigaature
- - - ~ l -
eignature and title date
•t~~~t~*tiMt~~tw**~it#t~a~tstS~ts*~~~~~M1~~~~rs~#ret~l~~s~r~sr~i~t#rw*~~l~lrat~~~isi~i~~~~~~~~~~w
Part V- to be completcd by County IItilities Dept.
A. Couaty Utilities Department requirements for prplim~ry plat,hav (have not) been
satisfied. n • r ` ~ ~
B. Signa-4..ure `
.
12a
r'si ture and title date
oert~sa~t~f~~~~r1~«r~~s~►~wM~s~~~s~t~y~s~~~~~t~~~~tl~i~*M«r~~~~~~~~rr~~~~sRsw~~#~qt~~sl~r~s~~ft~
Thi-s pa.~t to be ccclpleied by tYlanuing Lepar -Ment
PlanninQ Department Information . I 'r • ( ~ • 1 ~ ~ .
Date Submitted: ~ ' Preliminary Plat Fee: ~S~ D O
Date Accepted : ' Checkl ist Fee : .5f / 0• 4 d
Plat File No. Zone Change File No. ZE" -14 I-?,F
Plat Name: 0114-#E',S Ifbp/r.~/N Existinq Zoning: Arc'*r- l/Ettl.r-aitF
~4e .s
Number of Lots : Date Established: -
Ai.~.~ ~
Location : Sec..3.3 T 2.S R#~/ Advertiaed Zone Change :
School District : &OUJuIK, W.3t(r Checked by : ,STbES 4640C Aeariag Date:
.
I
_ J
.
AGENDA, NavEMBER 30, 1978
SPOKANt CQl1NTY HEARING EXAMINER TELEPHONE. 456-2205
Ti me : Thursda,y, EVovember 30, 1978, 8:30 A. M.
Place: Broadway Centre Building, 5ecand Floar
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
8:30 A.M.
A: PRELIMINARY SL3BDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Page
3. PS-1240-7$, CHESTERFIELD I5T ADDITION
2S-153-78 , AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
BYilfY/YVE4LaI • • • ! . i i i • i i • 9 • • + 1
2. PE-1241 -78, VIGUE' S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBlJRBAN OR TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL VIGi.IE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
.
3. PE-1242-7$, SIMPSON'S 2NO ADDITION
ZE-162-78, AGRICULTIJRAL~TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SYMPSON. . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 3
4. PE--7 243-78, CLAWSON' S ADDITION
ZE-163-18, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGi.F-FAMILY & TWD-FAMILY RESII~ENTIAL
I CLf 7WSONa • • • e r • a i • i ■ s f . . ■ s 4
12,00 Noon Lunch (PZ ace to be annaunced at Hearing )
1 .30 1 •i-Ir Rec4+'nreISC'
B. PRELIMINARY SL]BDIVISIONS. AND 20NE RECLASSIFICATIONS ~
7. PE-1244-18} SUNNY1JALE ACRES
ZE-1 64-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SIJBURBAN
FOGG i f . ■ ■ s • • . • • • • . . r • s s ~
2. PE-124.'~-78y PRATT ADDIT1ON
ZE-165-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SING~~-FAMILY RESI~ENTIAL
NIEREIVBERG . . . . . , . . . . . x , , . , ~
3. PE-1246-78j JAfSV1S EAS4
ZE-166-18, AGRICULTURAL TO SIiVGI.E-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
CUR4ti1 . . . • • • . . . • • • • . . ■ ■ s • 7
5• V4.+ P.M. !""1L7jL1U1 il
. .
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: The proposal is located in the southern portior
of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33,. Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the.S 528 feet and except the E 20 feet
in Section 33, Spokane County, Washington.
c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
Spokane, WA. 99206
,
d. Surveyor: ,Lawrence V. Dunsmore
9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206 '
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12
g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: ~--Model Irrigation District
k. School District: ~.Central Valley District #356
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will-have a
_ __si.gni fi cant _adverse _envi ronmental im act.
- • -
~ T
, -
NO ~
l _ _ .;i: . . • . LA__1
~9 100 101 102 10 ' ~ a►~ ,C~f, 107 108 IC 12• 1 .t ' i5 ~~6 Q(.1 ,
~14 ,~\13 Rn j • tyy. . r ! ~ J~~
l4~ cavi ~
s ~,ti • : ' • t
y ~s-►• ,
TN
~ ~ ♦ ~ GT _
C r
, ~ .
C ~ ~ Q . ~ x
T Ar T:
I \ k ~ i r~ ~`~f t
r a j ru o..a.
4'i z• - 2-
r ~
~ ~
\ L I ,
I 1 . ~`tz_ ~ _ _ ~ `~CM ~i
' . ~
STAFF ANALYSIS - November 30, 1978
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURE TO AGRICULTtJRE SUBURBAN OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
• A. Location
The proposal is located in the southern portion of the Spokaae Valley, in the
Chester area, on the southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish Road.
B. Proposal
- 4.5 acres subdivided into 12 lots for two family use (R-2)
- 'Iyipical lot frontage = 92'
- Typical lot size = 92' x 135' (12,400 sq. ft.)
- Lots perogross acre = 2.67 - Dwelling units per gross acre = 5.34
C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
The approved map of the Comprehensive Plaa indicates residential usage of this
area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation.
D. Land Use A.nalysis:
1. Existing Land Uses
The proposed site is presently pasture land and the general area has been
experencing urban density development over the past few years. A aumber of
subdivisions are located to the north, northwest, and southwest of the
proposal which have densities from approximately 12,000 sq. ft. to 30,000 sq.
ft. All of these are in single family use except for the plat of ChesterField
Additioa which is located to the southwest of the proposal, with lot sizes the
same as the proposed plat. The southern portion of Chesterfield Addition is
in two family use, which serves as a buffer to the commercial area further to
the south. To the northeast and east of the proposal are the plats of
Midilome aad Midilome First Additions. These subdivisions are of densities
si.milar to the proposal but with single family lots.
2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses
The proposal calls for essentially residential uses in an area nearly
surrounded by preliminary and fiaal plats similar in use. The lot sizes of
the proposal would be compatible with the surrounding area, although two
family use would create densities which are approximately double that of most
of the surrounding area.
-2A-
. , "STAFF ANALYSIS - Novembc. ~30, 1978 VIGUE'S ADDITI0h, continued ,
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and finds
that the roads within the proposed plat are basically acceptable.
B. Sewage Disposal
The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis-
posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, community septic taak
disposal, and community package treatment plant disposal. For economic
reasons, and to provide the most reaiistic alternative, the applicaat's engi-
neer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized.
The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual
on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District states that
an on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by their
office prior to the signing of the final plat. The plat is situated over the
Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examinatioa of the
possible impact on groundwater quality frorn this proposal have the following
comments:
Impact Discussion
a. The plat sponsor has proposed 12 lots on 4.5 acres with a typical lot
size of 135 feet by 92 feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water
system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises
the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area
and possible alternatives for sewage disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater,
and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley
upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage
treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to
the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents
(phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer
above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as
phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or
nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less
than the total found in septic tank effluents.
-2B-
STAFF ANALYSIS - Novem►. _t 74, 1978 VIGUE' S ADDITIc... ---`itinued
3. The calculated results at the downstream end of grouadwater
flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids
concentration expected at presnet (1975) is up to 93 mg/1
(milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background
of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental
concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background.
- - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year
2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured ia
terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration,
indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is
already a substantial proportion of the ulti.mate level.
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content
of the groundwater as in the range of 1.3 ppm. A projected incremental
increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of
1.4 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to
10 ppm.
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground-
water have the following general characteristics:
1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface
waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to
obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology.
These systems are not currently economically available for this
project.
2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on
evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land
area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as
lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively
poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost
are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and
drainf ields .
C. Draina$e -
The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan
submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions
will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final coastruction
plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing.
D. Water Supp-iy
The Proposal is located within the recorded service area of Model Irrigation
District #18.
The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on
their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
-2C-
' . :
STAFF ANALYSIS - Novemb ?n, 1978 VIGUE'S ADDITIOi --Rtinued
V. CONDITIONS:
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter
1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record
and/or attached sheets as noted.
2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than
one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, aor shall any lot be further
subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites
without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the
preli.miaary plat of record.
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be
held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A
1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat
boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the
plat boundaries.)
5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved
preliminary plat for distribution to the Plaaning Department and the utility
companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be
received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protectioa be approved by
the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also
have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protectioa district will
certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requiremeats aad will adequately
satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be
drafted on a transparency.suitable for reproduction..
The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy
of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made
with the plat sponsor for construction of the water sqstem, in accordance with
the approved plan, and in accordance with atime schedule. The time schedule
will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection
by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building
permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor
to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public
water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local
fire district aad purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the
subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.
-2E-
.
~
STAFF ANALYSIS - Novembe. ~0, 1978 VIGUE'S ADDITION continued
E. Fire Protection '
The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Spokane Fire
District #1.
The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require
mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a conditioa of
final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to
review and approve final construction plans.
F. Schools .
Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #356.
G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that sites for an
elementary school, Junior High School and a 15 acre community park are .
proposed ia the area east of Bowdish and south of 32nd Avenue.
H. Unique Environmental Features
None have been ideatified.
I. Cultural Resources
The county wide inventory indicates ao archaeologically significant finds have
been identified.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
The proposed plat is bordered to the west, east, and north by subdivisions which
have been received either preliminary or final zone changes to single family
residential. The area to the south of the proposal includes Agricultural, Two
Family, and Commercial zoning. Since Two Family zoaing has been approved in the
immediate area, it would appear that Two Family use might be compatible with the
area. However, no Two Family zoning would be directly adjacent to the proposal,
which would leave the proposal surrounded by zones different from that which has
been proposed. '
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the spoasor and has been reviewed
by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were
judged to exist.
Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified-oa the checklist in the
following categories: earth; air; water; flora; noise; light and glare; land
use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services and
utilities.
The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and
it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdictioa.
-2D-
. '
STAFF ANALYSIS - Novembe 30, 1978 VIGUE'S ADDITION continued
8. . That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the
filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to December 1, 1979.
10. That a declaration of Noa-Significance be issued, in accordance with
Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environtnental Ordinance (SCEO) prior
to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or
that any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340.
NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the
proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by
WAC 197-10-320.
11. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the
County Engineer.
12. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline
and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to
construction and the filing of a final plat.
13. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of
drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to
construction and the filing of a final plat.
14. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be
performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall
be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey
monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the
County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all
improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved
coastruction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
15. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
16. All constructioa within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to
filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer
to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification,
"As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with
the County Engineer.
17. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be
approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
18. That each lot be authorized for the use of iadividual on-site sewage disposal
systems.
19. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the
plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district.
-2F-
. . ~
STAFF ANALYSIS - Novembe P 1978 VIGUE'S ADDITION r-'-itinued
Special Conditions
20. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and
the Board of Couaty Commissioner's Resolutioa No. 77-1392 be accomplished by
the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of
County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as
instructed by the Planning Department staff.
21. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Two Family
Residential (R-2).
22. That the project spoasor may not be notified by the Hearing Examiner Committee
of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary
' plat approval.
23. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuaace of a proposed
Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration
" of Non-Signif icance .
24. That a public water system serviced by Model Irrigation District #18, and
including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 25. That final coastruction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer and the County Health District.
26. That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of
the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of
the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
27. That the plat dedication contain a statement to the effect that the use of
private wells in the plat is prohibited unless approved by the owner of the
public domestic use water system serving the plat.
28. That access permits be required for driveway approaches from the County
Engineer.
29. That ten feet of additioaal right-of-way be dedicated along Bowdish Road.
30. That cul-de-sacs,within the plat have at least a SO foot radius.
- 2G -
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CO"JCERNING )
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND )
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION )
PE-1241-7II VIGUE'S ADDITION ) NOTICE OF PU6LIC FIEARING
ZE-161-78 AGRICULTURAL TO )
AGRICULTURAL SUBURaAN OR )
TW0 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL )
SPONSOR: VIGUE )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, ►vill hold a public hearing at 3:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 15, 1979,
at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned preliminary
subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property:
Section 33, Totqnship 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 112
of the S 112 of the PdE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the PJW 1/4
except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the PJW 1/4 except the S 528 feet
and except the E 20 feet in Section 33, Spokane County,
Washington. Located in the southern portion of the
Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the southwest
corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish Road.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental
impact.
PJOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing
and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said
matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 18 day of December, 1978.
VERNON W. OHLAP-lD
CLERK OF THE BOARD
. ~
~
B Y. .
Ros'anne Montague, Deputy Clerlc
~
i
21190tCAN E i:Qll;ff 1f
DIk7'E: fFlO141;
C3l,IMTY COMMlSMONEM iOffFICE
E1Ol1TE To:
M A►QRICtJL'F'URE
0 ASSESSOR
0 A1O7'OR
0 1!l3FLDINti COOO
ri C.l.A.6.
0 ENWWEER:S
p MMTH
G JUVtEM1{.E G"tiUR'T
.0 LAW IlUSnCE
0 PAR1K3 A REGREAT10k
11 P'UMM'MEl.
~ PLANN11'iO 'C: PF10SEt:UT[?R
Q PURCHll,SII#i
C SHERIP'F
C 7'REASURER
0
~ -
FOR Yaua:
~ INFORMAtIc~
~ ACTIOw
Cl REPtY M
1-3 SLIPPI.Y VMBAL iNF#RMA71ON Ta
~ • f
V
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL REQFORA I9
C~MMISS/O
! NERS
Your name: Date: 12'8-78
~
Addre s s : 80.~ ~ • ~ _ Phone No:
Planning Commission Action BEing Appealed
Titl e •v C~ 4i~. f-0 c,,... 4
~
I.D. NumbEr rjF- 12 4~' 8 Date of Action JV•✓. S~, 7B
Signature
Your Reasons for Appeal:
M~r VS~-- pL pl*'~ ~S ~'S~1 ~ S G~c + 1'•~`o w•14
4 $ w t~ cJ5 C At~t- r-., 9 4 • Pr- 4f V cc/ .
.
RJ C E I V E-D
D 1 14 i R
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNfNG DEPARTMENT ~
,
BEARD3'G CO=T'I'FE y
PUBL~~ HEARING M TP~G EXANMVM CMffTETT~~
PUBLIC ~~G
Applicativr~ Na ,
Agplicant Application Nca.
k~ Applicant L";11
I would like -ta be on record in (Check one
I would 1ike to be on record in (Check one),
FAVOR 27 FA'VOR ~
Al-~PPOSITION
1561 4,PPOSITION ~
~
NFtrTPLaL ~-AL
Do you wish to TEST= at this Heaxing?
Do
~~h~~~C ~n~ } yau w~.sh to '`ESTI~ at this Hearir~g?
(CheCk ane)
YES
~ YE's
NO
NO
Name (Please Fx~int) ~1-~
Name (Please Print) ~J ~
.,ddre~s
Addre s s
1tFA1 •\G m=n +m VomiL 1 1 J..-'E _ i iE4i1Y LEY 4 .1aAFMM V ll1 "'MiTddi.i
PLMIC H.~ARING FUBLIC HEARIIVG
~c;~W ApPlxcati Na. `I~
Applicatian No.
~
~
Applicant ApPlican
~
I would like ta be on record in (Check Gne). I would 1' e ta be vn record in (Check one).
~ FAVOR
FAvOR (71
4 PP f ~ OSITIC~~
OPPOSZTION 1'-p
NELMAL
Da yau wiejh to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
Da you wish to TES= at th~s Hearing? (Check one ) YES
, 4~7 ~1T0
Y~ S
Naxne (P1 e a se 1'rint) -ji9A~ ees
N4
' Address v .4.
Narne (Please Frint)
Address
~
4 ~
!u 4"1' - . . 's . ~ _i;, . , s$ ta~h,~. i',~".~ ~F ~"i,; fw~1~ ' , ~ i ' ~ w.~ # ~ik. ~~JP~'.~'.~u.~~.f~7ki.4,.M1~~.'t~". . . ' i . I ~ Iy_ V~~{~..
e ~ ,Tk ' '=9~
~4L7.~1~~U 41 V~l'~~11~{~ ~~V ~ Y~1'~Y'~~l
L VL~1~ ~IJ.Y~~~L ~.Ai~~
Appl~Cat~,Or~ Na . l~~/' ~ App1 icat~~n ~a . ~ ~ ~ ` ~
App~-icant App~ i~~,nt
~~ra~~d li~e ~o b~ ari r~ c~~rd in ~~h.~ck an~ I~~au1d like t~ ~e on record in ~Check on~
I ~
FA~'OR ~ ~ ~ FAVO~ ~ ~
~ OPF~~~~r~I~ J~~ t~'
0~~4S~TI~N ! ~ .
~ ~ ~ - ~
~ ~ - - I!~'~1'~RA_I~ ~r
DO ~~ll W15r1 t~ T~ ~T3F`Y at ~as He~ri~g? I~ you w~.sh ~o T~STIFY at this Hearin ~
( C~ec~. ~n~ } ~ • ~Ch~ck one}
I ~ ~ ~
~ ~s
~ ~~o x ~ I No
Narne ~P].~as~ ~r~nt) ~I ~ ~ f` ~ ~ ~ ~.~p Narne ~Ple~se Frlnt~ ~12~~rV ~ ~~1~ ~
Add~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~]~~''FQ~ip 1
. i . ~ ~~1ik~+L~Ll ~i ~~I ~ 4 ~ ~ i
~
~ _ - - - - .~:ti~~.~.,~ LL.Ma , : - r- . 4' ,i ~r~~y.f.~R.C*r:~. ~-.,t .a _ ~ G~ ~ r ?`1,°~~F,:~~
~
~„~{~~r ~`~L ~".~~~r ~~P~~~
~
A ~a~cati.an Na. ~ I
~~~~ti~ Appli~ation I~a. _ , . . . . . ~PP~iCB~.nt ~ ~ i ~ u~ Q~C~ i-~ ~ ~ ~
A~p~icar~t ~ UL~ ~ ~,~p~I T7 ~ ~ -
~ would ~~ke to ~e o~a re~ord an ~Check one), ~ wauld li'ke to be ~n record ~.n ~Ch~ck one~.
-
~ ~ FAV~R
~ F~V~R ~
f ~ _ r ~ 4P~OS~TIOY~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ v~ ~~POS~T~O~i ~ f f ~
~ ~ ~ - ~A~ , ~
~ _ ~
Do yau wish ~~STIF"~ at ~s H~aring? l7a ~rau wa, sh to T~' ~T~ at thi s He~.r ing? ~ Che ck nne ~
(Check on~}
~ cif ~YES
Y~S
~ ~ ~ ~b
~ ' ~
~ Name (~~ease Pr~ir~~~ --7 ~m;'t~ ~ac~e (Please ~'ir~t) ~ ~~l~~
p Addr~ s ~ ~ , ~l ~ ~ ~,~i
Ac~dr~ ~s ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ~pa~c~ , .
_ ~ I -
. _ , . . _ . , . . .t~
I~AR~NG ~~F'~ C4i~f~'~TE~ H~ARING C~I'~~N~TTEFa ~`CJBL~C F~A~Q Pi~BL~C HEARING
~y}/~~q ~yT/~ ~ APpli~ation Na. Ji~M~l~-G~~~\7i6 LYV 4 ~
Appliaan~ Applican~ ~ ~ ~ -
I wou].d lik~ ~ be ~n r~eord i.n (Ch~ck or~e
T v~ould like ta ~e an recar~d. in {Ghe~k one
~i FA~O~ ' ~
~ ~ ~'A~TOR ~ ~ aPPQS~TI~N ~ y~ !
~ ~
f~] OPPaS~TIO~ ~ 1 / ~ ~IECITRAL
r ~
f ~ ilo you ~~i sh ta T~ST~ at tY~r ~ He ar~n~ ?
~ y~u w~.s~► to '~~S'~IFY at th~s Hearin~?
(Ch~ck an~~ ~ ~S
~ f ~
I .l ~s z~t ~ ~~z~~~~ ~ ) ~
~ra ~a~~~~ ~o~ f~` ~
{~i~~~~
11 r't r^~ i+6 Z+ l- ~ I//~ Yi~6"~ ~ k}i~f P~
l'►u}.li 4 l1.] k1 1 ` 1 4t V+r+ d~~ 1Lj ..J..lr..~
. n.
File No. PE-1241-78
Z E-161-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 30, 1978,
and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman,
Abby Byrne, and Ted McCoury.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Phil Vigue, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and
zone change PE-1241-78, Vigue's Addition and ZE-161-78, Agricultural to
Agricultural Suburban or Two Family Residential for subdivision of 4.5 acres
into 12 lots for duplexes and there being present, the following applicant or
representatives:
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential use
classification .
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been compl ied with.
1
,
, File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area.
8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is detrimental to
the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and
welfare.
9. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That duplexes should be held to a buffer area along 40th Avenue.
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:
1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of
record and/or attached sheets as noted.
2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no
more than one dwelling strucfiure be placed on any one lot, nor shall
any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional
lots or building sites without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated
on the preliminary plat of record.
2
. • ^ File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described
property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be
dedicated or deeded: A I` strip at the ends or edges of all streets
that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs
are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries. )
5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the
approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department
and the uti I ity companies. Written approval of the easements by the
utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final
plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be
approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said
water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health
authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and
fire protection district wi11 certify, prior to the filing of the final
plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance
with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective
needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a
transparency suitable for reproduction.
3
File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements
have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water
system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with
a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for
completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate
health authorities prior to application for building permits within the
plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding
Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot
purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat
sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the
public water system as approved by County and State Health
authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed
within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual
domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to
sale of each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior
to the filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to
December 1, 1979.
4
r
File No. PE-1241-78 ~
ZE-161-78
10. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with
Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance
(SCEO) prior to approval of this recommendation by the Board
of County Commissioners, or that any approving action in accordance
with SC EO 11 .15. 340.
NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the
proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required
by WAC 197-10-320.
11. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the 3
dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road
system in the plat by the County Engineer.
12. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street
centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for
approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat.
13. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and
alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer
for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat.
5
File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
14. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shali
be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land
surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of
,
the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during
construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As
Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were
installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction
plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
15. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
16. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed
prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements,
construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the
street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer.
17. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to
be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
18. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage
disposal systems.
6
. ~
File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
19. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence
that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed
water district.
Special Conditions
20. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution
No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within
thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County
Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as
instructed by the Planning Department staff.
21. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Two
Family Residenfiial (R-2).
22. That the project sponsor may not be notified by the Hearing Examiner
Committee of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal
of any preliminar-y plat approval.
23. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a
proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of
a final Declaration of Non-Significance.
24. That a public water system serviced by Model Irrigation District #18,
and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot.
7
, •
,
File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
25. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer and the County Health District.
26. That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the
specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads
providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed
to the standards of the County Engineer.
27. That the plat dedication contain a statement to the effect that the use
of private wells in the plat is prohibited unless approved by the
owner of the public domestic use water system serving the plat.
28. That access permits be required for driveway approaches from the
County Engineer.
29. That ten feet of additional right-of-way be dedicated along Bowdish
Road.
30. That cul-de-sacs within the plat have at least a 50 foot radius.
31. If a right-of-way connection south to the Chesterfield Addition can be
obtained the sponsor will be required to construct a fully improved
connection to the Chesterfield Addition instead of the temporary
cul-de-sac as indicated on the preliminary plat of record.
8
File No. PE-1241-78
ZE-161-78
32. No direct access to 37th Avenue from lots in plat except from the
existing dwelling unit.
33. Sewage management system required.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds
that the application of Phil Vigue for a preliminary plat, Vigue's Addition
and a zone change as described in the application should be denied.
Motion by : McCou ry Seconded by : Byrne
Vote: Unanimous
H EA R I N EXAM I N E R COMM I TT E E
7 -
~
Chairphan
/
ATT EST : O
FRED L. DAYHARSH
Planning Director
By:
9
.rLE 7 a
33-z5-qq
AN ~1[* 19SM-t-m C~ ~ ~ ; v'
'
TNRESKOLD CETERMINAT!;)N
.
O S~~ OECLARAtION OF
(propQSeC/f!nal)
-,VonJS° N c MAcG
{ignificnnct/nonsictniiic3nte)
1. 7escriatian aT arooosai:--$a !V~1JI OI'j tg~ ~ 4cos /^Ho- IA /dfs &r
~o .
A1 sQ. zo..e. Gh A4~a e. rrt 144 Y.
,
l. PrOpOR2ltt'
~km e AerJ Cp rjs4f °
3. Contact Persan:
=y McL:on i; i Requested: :one tlanqe; X_ Prei ;mfnery dlet
. :our
nopmval: rinal Plat anprnval; Charsge -ji' :anaiti~3n
Other:
,.:r:.i~01 "
" ;r04QSII1:j§+ tL%r, vv_ af
6. Lsaa ager.ty: SPOKArIE CpUNTV, aASNI►K;iQ'Y
Tni~ ~prOpO5d) 7ns been detern+lned .o ~ have aiicnifiCant adverse imvact on [nt ?nviro»ment. '1n EIS ts
NOt' re~quirea under RCU »3.21C.0~0 Th1; lec,sian was made 3fter ''?Vtqy bv the County if a cam-
i eted anviron+nentai _hec.i:sc ind OtrtEf +nrorrndCiCl1 ~]A r;'e witn tne 'ea4 3aern_v.
qe_;,onsible Ifjitiai:
Prooosea Declaration: ~fnal )ec:aratior:
L.. e !D t6~ vame J(to ~ Nev-1y
;ignaturo :~r J•"~ /!r~, ignatwe
~ t (J~ O
74tte 't0~ i T'tle A,VMAA
Deoartment91 IAgO N ~e PJ 4 ]eparttnent~~NlEx.
laEe O$1-18 ~ 0~a te
8. For -3ectara:ions of Significance Only:
r' QatB o` =xoected '4raTt Avaliaoil;t-, ~ '1~pLArmlne~d ev ?esuUns4bte :it':c, 3i)
':C° .i:UaI1CQ
3E CQJ4PlETkD BY RES?QHSISL£ OFFIC:AI:
a. 3rier deSCriDtlon 3nQ Tist`ng ~f ",hdsC Envirnrnnental impac*_5 leadtng :o such ieclara:ion:
3rier exoiar,atton of Nn3t ireasurns, if any. ~-ouia be tzken Dy :ne 3Dalizact :o .,revent 3r m1LlgaLB =m@
environm*.nta7 i-DdC: --r 'hE LTODOSJl 'D ::JCh i(1 exCC'nt :ha: Lh@ ~'PSOot1;lbl2 ~~frzctai =auid conSider j *~Vi5z~1
ar~GOSal d1'.h ? DiiS1nl?+-a;a1-,^r, JC!-3''4r-df1 JT -rn5'':r1`i_3nC2:
a .
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING cXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Znd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TG AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: The proposal is located in the southern portion
. of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Aveoue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except the E 20 feet
i-n Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. -
c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
- Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District
k. School District: Central Valley District #356
l. h1ethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be ~
whether or not this proposal will have a ,
_ significant adverse environmental impact. ;
` O ~ • • y I
` _ : _ : ti y~ . . -i: . . • > ? r 1 ST
~ V
\ , NO T
- - ± •%~~•i •r . •t/•~4:c.. ~ ,
99 100 101 102 10's "i 4 ~c\6 107 10e cl-I ic ~13 1 i-44 15116 Q C~~F
~ 13a^ ~a SH. ~ lL J
\ 34 /h . - . • j~r+ a..a ~ i
~tQ4~ \ ` 3' v ~ "'~~a ~ ~3 TH ♦ Y~ 1
~ e ^
Q \ ,r j~ Q 3~ r.y I i
j ~O ~ ~ ► I i AA rpq A r4_ Q ! ~ t
~ p
1 ~ ~r \ \ ' i '1 ,,4~r ~ I 3,~ rs+ .av ~ . ~ ~ ~ T~) '
. , . ~ \ `4.
y ~ . . t N-* 2 -
~ • o _ , .
, o
I `y r 3 ,
• j • ~4 ; ~ o ,4►2 Z ~ i
L "
Petition to the Spokane County Planning hearing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or 'I'wo-Family Residential
ZOCA'I-IOn: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
ZEGAL UESCRIPZ'IaN: Section 33, Township 25N, P,ange 44
E. W. N. 7'he 5 2 of the 5 2 of th e riE 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. ,
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
to the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
,
NAN~E ADDRESS
. e~-~-
~e ~
_ - - ~ -!..C~ -G ~ • - ~ ~ = z .s_ _ . _ . _ _
~v~ -
- - - ~ ~2
+ ~'A 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y.~" I ' •
7
G'~ ii e e ~ 1 ! 4~~~
ll~.~
. ~ y ~ .
~ - ` ~ ~ . ~J , ,~=>~1~•ti~ ~ ~ ~ . 1145 :
, . ~
~
~~`''n-
~ l ~
~ ~6
- ~ ~ 2
r r,~ _1, . Z s ~ ~ ~
F
h~
,f, - - - - .
~f(
✓ ~ ~V_-~~
~ p
4-e- A '7
- - - - -
. a 4 ~ ~ ~•e,~._r~ r-I~--4-
w _ .
Petition to the 5pokane County Planning ILearing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Z-wo-Family Residential
ZOCAZ-ION: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
L.EGAL DESCRIPZ`ION: Section 33, Township 25N, Fange 44
E. W. N. Z'he S 2 of the 5 2 of th e l~E 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NAME ADDRESS
~.7~..
~K yzo J.6.4K
° l ,y i ~ ~ H
~,Q'„~~~
_ ~ ~ ~ f y L/.~-! -
~,~~--<.►-i n..~,~✓?.,.•-~'
~ ~ ic.~•__ r L ~ ~ Z-- ~ - - - - - - - ~ _
,
^ r
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane .
PRFLIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR T4J0-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: - The proposal is located in the southern portion
of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Aveaue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except the E 20 feet
in Section 33, Spokane County, Washington.
` c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
Spokane, WA. 99206
d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12
g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District
k. School District: Central Valley District #356
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact.
` y~ , ~ ~ ,
- ~ t ST ~
t , -
\ I NQ ~
. ~ .
99 100 101 102 10' i~107 108 C I •~i~2 i~~ ~~i-~ 115• 116 ac ' 9
~L J~ ~
\ ~ jC /h . • - . ~ lir+~ c~..a ~
be'~
tp r ~ g1 ~ Y
3 v ~ \4 ~ `~`sr 3 + i c r ° 3 r'' , ~ ` ~Q~,
O ^ ~ ~..v•..n ^cs ~ ll +
o ~ ~ 1 ~ Q . y 3~
i \ 1011
1 ~ ~ • i ~ ~ l 37*sr .cve. S 3~r
.o \ e9 ~iy 1
: , .
< t \ a L^~ 2' _ 2 _
y 'I1 ' o • ~
• ~
Petition to the Spokane County Planning }Learing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or 'I-wo-Family Residential
LOCA'I-ION: the proposal is located in the southern
portion of the 5pokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road. •
LEGAL DESCRIPZ'IaN: Section 33, Township 25N, P,ange 44
E. W. N. Z'he S 2 of the S 2 of th e l~E 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW -41 except the E 20 feet and except the IV 25 feet ; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington.
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NAME ADDRESS
i a - ~ - . 1~'e.`°~ e' "'~1\.~1 , ~ e~'.~ ` f~ _ _ . _ - " 0 O
. ~ ~
:3Y1 7
L
,
. ~
i~~~
ii
~ 21,
f i //o s d*4 rT- .
aLL) s la h CA-
C./1
yo
3y
. ' ~ I •
~
l
l~
4
~J
IL 7- O
. ~ ~
~
~
li'I
I l
~
~
I
i ~
~
I~
I
~
~
I'
~
`
I
I
1
f
Y
~
~
II
i~
Ii
'II
1
1
~
I
li
1
~l
I~
, -
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING cXAMINER COMMITTEE '
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR T4J0-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a. Location: . The proposal is located in the southern portion
. of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Aveoue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except th2 E 20 feet i-n Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District
k. School District: Central Valley District #356
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. ~
, ~ - . ~ -
. - ' y~ • . . • , • .
' ` , eiti sT
. -
_ _ ' .i'.:^ ~r1~_, ~ . , T . .'t~
99 100 101 102 iC~' 107 108 iC IS I 16 QI • ~
, ~ • .
~ • ~ 3~^►a
33Rn
In' 33T"'r I/ ~ ~VVH
. . s
, ~ ` j r Q ~ 3i ~ ~ !
~ ~l ~ b
~
A7n+ ove. ~ ° i-7T~
Z
` ~ • ~
~ . ~ ,
r
v •
Petition to the Spokane County Planning l-,earing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or 7-wo-Family Residential
I,OCAZ-I01\-: the proposal is located in the southern
portion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road. LEGAL UESCRIP7'ION: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44
E. W. N. Z'he S 2 of the S 2 of th e nE 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the 1VW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington.
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We re~quest the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Commi-ttee to deny the request.
nAIU-E ADDRESS
p✓ )l.. ~ (~tJ~~~~~~~'/ .~l~ /~i..~~~
%~~dl~WLc-.l~ s J S ~ S v`~C~O~la~lrCr ~ O~~ce.~ (/`.ZC~~
R A 0 `"n
~
, - ~ r= P
P~
. //3o vc'e 9 2:1-0
~
7-~~ _ F,40 { Fy16 ~
-
~5 19oq:5~
_.17 1C~6
.
~ . /_l<~2l~~T~___~~~
ii~A -7
,
y
, , ~ ~ Q` ~
19~,d~~sf
Q6
Cl,~oca
, ~ J ~ t d C
.
~
~9
9
q q
ze
,
~ f If --i>
k
.
CiVA
~ --o
' ~
c, J ~
o
7 ~ Li
WO CA -Q\a
I t
w
~ON)
~ 3p
' ~ • 4 ~ ~ ,
3 AOI
,
1 '
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE '
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Znd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: . The proposal is located in the southern portion
of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Aveoue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except thz E 20 feet
in Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue ,
11408 E-37th
Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, 4JA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12 -
g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District
k. School District: Central Valley District 1#356
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact. ~
. ~ >
, -
` • 1 sT
.v'
32ND
•rrte.•c- • ir _ T _•rTt:~ ,
99 i00 101 102 in' iC,6 107 108 c'? ic •I. .w~12 IA4 '15 116 Q
~ 3• S►1. ' J~ ~
V jelri-1 ( ,~r
y `
` ' s~ ~ "~~v ~ ~3~TM ~ • ~ I
. . ,y ~ ♦ t ~ c r _
\ 11 ~
\ .o 7 I ~..o•,. c, ~ ' ~ ~
A ' f; r~ .
• ~ ~ \ ~ , ~ . • a ~ ~
i ~ c ~ ~ • _ ,a r r ~ .3,~ r,. ov..
2 _ . ~ 1 ~7 • ~ ~
~ ` i • ' r' ~ 1 . .
007
~
Petition to the Spokane County Planning }-learing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or 'I-wo-Family Residential
I,OCA'I-I0N: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
s outhwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
I,EGAL UESCRIPZ'IaN : Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44
E. W. M. 'I'he S 2 of the S 2 of th e nE 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet ; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NVJ 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
W e request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NA~U:E ADDRE55
,
~ Of~
~
6 Ic>
40- '-a .
f Z~
,
a f./ 3
19----/!S'~XS
. ~ ~
~ ~~.3z'16
~ S6 "3cciv %A~~S
- C~
l
~ .
5. 3 462
, _ , .
1 .
I
Petition to the Spokane County Planning hearing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Z-wo-Family Residential
ZOCAZ•I0N: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
s outhwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
ZEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44
E. W. N. Z'he S 2 of the S 2 of th e l~E 4 of the 5E 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
the5E 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NAN'~E ADDRESS
~-C
.
~ . S- a
I/,
i
~
♦ 1
A
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING cXAMINER COMMITTEE '
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRFLIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR T4J0-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: - The proposal is located in the southern portion
. of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Aveoue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except the E 20 feet
i-n Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12
g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential-
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District '
k. School District: Central Valley District #356
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact.
~ ~ -„h
~ ~ ` > - T 3 ;
\ . I ST
_ ~ ` •r N~ .t/•l4 c. • ~ ~ T r: :~•i: rf'~Tr:i.
~99 100 101 102 inl iC,6 +07 108 K' iC i f 3 •1 1 y '15 116 ac tl ~
\ \ 1 j ~•►o
. 3a iti iir+~ a..o ,
o i.. ^
' ~ rl l
, ' ~..o•.~ CT
Q ~ ~ j Q: ~ 3L r~► ~ . ~ ,
is % Trv
4i
~ • ~ `a ~ i ~,~qr r i 3.~m. o,.~. ~ i~T~~ ~
n_2_-
.
~ , . .
~ ~ . .
~ ~ ~t. ~ . } ~a"-~,o•~ ~ I
~ N •
Petition to the Spokane County Planning ILearing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
ZOCATION: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
LECAL DESCRIPZ'ION: Section 33, Township 25N, Pange 44
E. W. Ni The S 2 of the 5 2 of th e 1~E 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the I~3W 4 except the 5 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
to the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
IVAME ADDRESS
c A,~
./11,2
`
0.
nL
C . e
✓
3 2
--T 7
~
Z J
z~ 2/5' ~ 3 7~
_ ~~~,c~« a . _ ~ ~ ~ I / E~ s ~!L ~ ► ~ ~
~
~ ~ _~7 -
z
✓ L
o
~
~
o ~
7
~..~,K~~_
"04
4
- - ~
e--
t~k
Petition to the Spokane County Planning hearing Examiner
Committee f or the denial of :
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
LOCAZ-ION: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
ZEGAL DESCRIP`I`IaN: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44
E. W. N. Z'he 5 2 of the S 2 of th e l~~E 4 of the SE q of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the I~IW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, VJashington. ,
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NAIUE ADDRES5
/l2° 7
o `-7 7-5-7
~
~
AGENDA, November 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING cXAMINER COMMITTEE '
TIME: Thursday, November 30, 1978 (Item 2 on Morning Agenda) - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1241-78, VIGUE'S ADDITION
ZE-161-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR TulO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: . The proposal is located in the southern portion
of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area,
on the southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except the E 20 feet
i-n Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
c. Sponsor: Phil Vigue
11408 E 37th
Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence V. Dunsmore 9803 E Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 4.5 acres
f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Duplexes
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, (established 1/6/59)
i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family Residential
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District
k. School District: Central Valley District #356
1. Method of Sewage Disposal: . Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Imapct: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact.
~ - - - ~ -
, i ST 3 ,
_ _ ,r, ND r~H..Y.. ~ ~ T . .'r,TT.!• '
.
' 99 100 101 102 10' \V),i 106 107 108 I("~ iC .ctl~• I1~ 1 ,-4 'IS• 116 Q t,l,•' ,
~ jjan ~ ' ~ ~^O~ 3• TN f , J~
~ ,v`O
, O \ ~ 0~ Q ~ 3i r~v ~ I
O v ~ ~ ~ J , ~ • T a~ i a ~ \ + , Vf i
~4q~ \ ~ ~ .~y~T>I L~v s.
~
2 _
( ` ~ . ' .
. ~ ~
• j ~4' i , `l G M .4►2~ ~ 1 .
9 ) \ •
1 -
r-"
Petition to the Spokane County Planning ~learing Examiner
Committee for the denial of:
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-12~1-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Z~wo-Family Residential
ZOCA'IIO~:: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area~ on the
s outhwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
I~EGAL DESCRIP`I'I01~: Section 33, Township 2~N, Range ~4~
E. W. Ni . 'I'he S z of the S 2 of th e I~E 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washin~ton. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
. ~
NAN`~E ~ ADDRESS ~~'~1~...
~ " ~ '
~ ~
. ; ,
6° C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ + ~ ~
- ~ - _ , ~ -1.. ~ - - - / ~
do r' i- ~
, .5~~1 ~n ~ ~ 3
~3 ~
I r ~ ~
I 1•?/~/ y w~ f.:~C~ . J. ~i'-~ ~ t~~ 4~~~1 .~,~~~r~Z~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ c~.s ~
- ~ ,
~ - o ~ ~S/ ~ ~~a ~.v - / cf' `I l
~ ~
~ ~ ,
~ . ~
~
~,~.e:~..~ ~ ' , ~.s
il ~ ~ ~ ir
~ ,,~r / ~ ~ _ i , .
Y - ~ _ ~
~
. ~ _ ~ ~ _
~-~~,y ~a~~,~,~~i
~
_ ~ _ -~e~e,_~__ - ~~1 ~r z:_ ~b -r~g~
.~~r~ ~~n _ _ - - ~ `
~ ^
s ~~.o~ ~~-c~~~~~t
~ ~ ~o6~r~ ~s`~, l~~o~' ~U~ qc~7$ -3~i 7 ~
~@;c~' ~ -
yQ~ti,, ,
~ I~S/~ 7"~ QZZ-Z Z-~~
b~ is! r- ii~ . ~
~ ~
~ ~ S= ~ yd~- 9~~~ - ~6~~
~ _
; n ~ ~ 3 ~v~ -o ~5,~
, /
S ~ ~~u -
-
_ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~2 _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_ ~ ~ ~.o ~ ~ ~ r_ ~
~
_ , ~ ~ / ,
~ ~ _ ~ , ~ Qa-.~~~ ~
_ _
r l
Petition to the Spokane County Planning hearing Examiner
Committee for the denial of :
Proposed rezoning of Vigue Addition PE-1241-78 from
Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Zwo-Family Residential
ZOCAZ-I01\: the proposal is located in the southern
p ortion of the Spokane Valley in the Chester area, on the
southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish road.
LEGAL DESCRIPZ'ION: Section 33, Township 25N, Pange 44
E. W. N. The S 2 of the S 2 of th e l\E 4 of the SE 4 of the
NW 4 except the E 20 feet and except the N 25 feet; and
theSE 4 of the SE 4 of the NW 4 except the S 528 feet and
except the E 20 feetin Section 33, Spokane County, Washington. .
We the undersigned property owners and residents are opposed
tb the proposed rezoning of the property to include duplexes.
We request the Spokane County Planning Hearing Examiner
Committee to deny the request.
NAI1E ADDRESS
. c~. _ .
,
~~,f gZ~~l1 Z~
~7_*j
~ ~
sianey . smit4 coo, ' nc.
REALTORS
RESIDENTIAL SALES • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • LAND DEVELOPMENT
E. 12019 SPRAGUE AVE., SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 •(509) 928-1100
Novetnber 21, 1978
Spokane County Pl anning Conuni s s ion
Broadway Centre Building
North 721 Jefferson .
Spokane, WA 99201
Re: Pr_eliminary Subdivision and 7one Reclassificatior_
PE-1241-78 and ZE-161-78, Vigue's Addition
Gentlemen:
The undersigned, having a property interest in Joey-
Marie Second Addition, desires to protest the zone change
for the above which will be considered November 30, 19 78 .
Thirty-seventh Avenue between Bowdish Road and Pierce
has been developed for single-family dwellings. Therefore,
to allow duplexes on the lots which would be developed on
37th between Bowdish and Skipworth would be an inconsistent
land use and harmful to the value of_ the single-family
dwellings which are under construction and will be constructed
on the north side of 37th between Bowdish and Skipworth.
If permitted at all, any change of zoning allowing
duplexes instead of single-family dwellings should be
allowed only on lots south of 37th but not on lots abutting
37th whether the duplexes would face 37th or not.
Respectfully,
:
Thomas S. Smith
3714 South Sommer
Veradale, WA 99.037
TSS/ j lk
~
`
ffv~
C. ~10
o~
~ ~
Q
SPOKANE COUNTY -9 ~ .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, N. 811 JEFFHR80N
F
~V
C~
.7POKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
: o•~ _ ~ ~ i ! ~
/
~
J UDD CHARLES E
N 1014 PI NES RD
~
5PGKANE WA 99206
~
33542-0407 ~
~
ND ~
~ A
E R A E4 Lt E 441 `9 8
. G.•_~ l ~ ~ 1ES~SED ~.~r~1 ~ 4~
~ ~O
' - r.~ ~ TJ FGFI1~!!1~D ~ Ey~vt24 ~ DFPq~ y~.y
t1~:~ • T4 SENUER _ ~s- 1313 ti`° r~IFN
- - ~ --4 ~ _ ~ r
~ - ~
.i . v
C`r'FICE OF COUNTY EN:ANEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dote Qcllp~k 19-W,
Inttr-office Cotnmunicotion
TQ PLANNI NG COMMS S I ON
From GARY RENNALY, PLANNING b TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER
Su6 jesR R0AD CAN DIT IQNS * FOR PE- /2 S// Ui~l1E 's AD(7. ,33
*CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNI7ER CONSIDERATION
>1 that conditional approval of the plat is givea aubject to dedication oF Right of
Trlay to the pu5lic and approval of the road system in the plat by the Couaty En,gfII.ear;
C c that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing propo9ed street centerlino and curb
grad-as be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction aad
the filing of a final plat; .
L"`~that drainage plan9 and design calculations shoWing the grades aad I aligvmQeat of dxafa-
$ge facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to coastruction
an3 the filing of s fioal plat; .
~-construction within the proposed public streets aad easements ahall be per£vrrsed
under the direct supervf9ion of 8 licensed land 8urveyor, who ehall be reagonsible
for perpetuatiag all evidance of the location oAO, survey monuments whfch may be
disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County Ettginter with "As
j3uilt" plans and a certificate in Writing that all impzovemeats were installed to
the lines and grades showm on the approved constructioa plans and that all disturbed
monuaents have been replaced; .
(-.-JS- no construc[fon work is to be perfoxmed within the Public Right o! Way aatil a p-ermit
has been i9sued by the County Lngineer. All work is subjeet to inspection and approval
by the County Engineer;acCess Perlo4s regGcrred -Poor dv;vewaY aPP-002~kt-s,
O- gll construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to fiting
the f inal plat or a bond in the 8mount es timated by the Counry Engineer to eover the
cost oi con3tructian of improv2men[s, construction certificatfon, "As Built" plaas.
snd r:,onw-nsnting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County En,gi, aer.
i. ?-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additionel right of
ways are dediceted and roads are established es County Roads.
r
•--10 direct access from lots to 3tub Road connections until such roads are constructad
to Coun[y Standards and establiahed es County Roads.
";-road design, rough grading construction, and drainege control for 1/2 rights of ways
and Stub Road connections are the responeibility of the Developer.
the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a desiRn proposal accept-
Qbi.e to the State Highwey Department of the proposed State Highway-County Roed inter-
Rection. State Highway Departmen.t approvei of the proposed design must be received prior
F.o the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the S[ate Highway are to be the respon-
cibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost of sucl:
improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County
Engineer and the StAte Highway Department.
(E )-that all roads within the plat be curbed andAMpaved to the specifications of the County
ingineers Eacisting County roads providing direct access to lo! s of the plat shall bQ
; avpd andjocurbed. to the standards of the COUTlty E1'1g1Y1P,P.r.
:-no dl*ect accese from lote to
A-deaiG$tion of 1'4NFEET additional Right of Way alang F}ow/1i,tg RD_
. -.-;.hat the ouner, hie grentees end aseigns agree to participate in and not oppose or
Drote et and R ID on ~_01 5 ~r (;?40rV5 C) AC C (JC- _ :5/-165 .
PE-1241-78 & ZE-161-78
In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Phil Vigue, 11408 E 37th,
Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as VIGUE'S ADDITION. Also to consider
changing the Zoning map from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or Two-Family
Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective
only upon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property. The property being
platted is described as: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 1/2 of the
S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the E 20 feet and except the N
25 feet; and the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 except the S 528 feet and except the
E 20 feet in Section 33, Spokane County, Washington.
(Located on the southwest corner of 37th Avenue and Bowdish Road).
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE O F V'JASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
1 ~A pKOJ 1 c , being flrst duly sworn on oath,
deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the United States of Amerlca, and a resident of the State of
Washington over the age of IQ years.
That on the day of , 19 I personally
posted one (1) or more true and\ccrrect copies of the hereto attached and incorporated
' hereln by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING fn a consptcuous manner at each of
the following locattons, to-wtt:
3916 11SG cS- ent,~~~JA_
2 . ~;>o4-17 aSkA~,nj,~~nn -0 e4 ~-3-772-1- ~ P.
J 3 ,-,ooo;~+ -3~7`1-1 4= ac.ocP" !S Gr 7 ~ ~rtm•~•~ -
U "
L'ATED THIS l"s DAY OF 19 -7~ •
;
SIGNE
P
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this M~day of
Notary Public fn an for the State of
Washington, residing at Spokane, Washingto;
~ ~
~
, . _ ~
~
AGEND~4, ~I~ovemb~er ~0, 1'~lB TELEP~~NE : 456-22~5
SP~I~AN~ ~OUI~TY RLANNI~JG H~ARII~~G E~fAMIf~ER COMNIIT~~'E '
TIM~; ~hursd~y, Nov~rr~ber 30, 197~ ~Ite~M ~ on Mo~r~ing Ag~~da}
PLA~~: Br~adwa~r Centr~ ~uilding, ~nd F1oor ~
N 7~1 ~]~f~ersa~~, Spokane
.
P~t~LI~INAR'I S~1~~IUISI~h~ ANa ~~1N'~ RECL#~~S~FICAT~(~I~
,
PE-1Z4~-1~, VIGl1E ~ AqQIY~OS~ - ZE-1~6~-18, AGRI~l~LTURAL ~U ~4GRI~l~LTUR,~L SU~UR~AN ~R TW~-FAh1Il~Y R~SIDEh1~~A'L
L~acation: The pr~p~sal is lo~ated in ~h~ southerr~ part~an -
of °~he 5~~kane V~l~ey in th~ ~hester ~rea,
~ ~n the s~uthwest c~rner 37th ~v+~oue ar~~ ~r~w~i~h R~ad.
b. L~gati Descri~tian; ~~~tian 33, Town~hip ~5~, ~ange 44 ~.W,~. - T1~e S~~~ c~f the S 1~~ o~' t~e I~E ~J4 af the
S~ 1~4 ~f the N~l 1~4 except the E~~ f~e~~ and exc~pt ~he ~J ~5 fe~t; ~n~ the
l~'4 ~f tk~~ S~ 1~4 of the NW 1J4 ex~cept the ~ 5~8 fee~ arad +~xcept the E 2t~ ~f~e~t ~
in ~~ctiQn 33, S~ok~n~ ~our+ty, W~s'~in~tor~.
5pc~nsa~°: Phi1 U~gue _
~14~$ ~ 3lth
5p~kar~e, 1~A, 99~~6
Surveyor: Lawrence V. ~ur~s~n~re ~ 98~13 ~ Sprague
Sp~k~n~, '~A. 9'9~[~~
e. ~~t~ Size: 4.~ acr~~
f. Na~~h~r af L.~ts : 1?
g. ~'r~posed Land U~~: ~u~Bexes
h. '~xisting Zon~~nc~: ~gricultural, (e~t~blisl~ed ~/bJS~} -
i. ~rop~sed ~~ning; A~~°rcul~~ural Sub~ur~an o~ Twn-F~mi~y Res~den~ial j. ~I~t~r S~~ur~ce: M~~~l Irrigation District
k. ~cho~l ~z~tr~i~t: Cent~ral Ualley ~istric~ #356 -
1. ~let~ad of S~ewag~ Di~~~~~1. ~ndividual ~eptic tanks
Envir~or~~ental jmap~t. ~ topi~ ~f d~s~cus~i~n ~t thi~ hear~ing ma~+ ~e _
wh~ther ~r not th~s prop~s~l wi~l hav~ ~
~igr~i f y c~~n~ adv~r~~ env~ r~r~m~ntal act. ~ ti ~ t ~ ~ r
- i
~ ~ ~ ~ '
` - I ~ t _ _ ~ -
` ~ - ,i!'.~ :'i~~ • .,,'r~,r!'T►'•~.
"ti~ '1~ ~ I ~ rGl!~ 'r~ '1~,1i I~V [ ~ ' ~3 l~L~ I'C11 i ~ , y ~ . ~ ~8 ' 1~- ~ ~ ~ , • 4' +~I
tl~~ ' ~ a y~ti _ ~
°MV~ j~ ~ I ~ rr. y ~J ~
9!~M + I S,,y ~ - j ~ , ~ I
~ 4¢ . 'csr ~ ~ ~1 ~ ' 4 r ~ ~ 3~ T+r i ~ ~1 1A~~w1
~ ~ ~ ¢ - ~MY ,k~~t~ Ai ~ I ~1 y ~ " ~
`,5 _ ~ ~ - I ~ ; ~ ~r~ , 4 ~ . ~ ~
r~ ~ r ~ 1 ~ Y ~ 1 + ~ ~i+ ~ ~
V L ~ r - S`~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ w\ ~ '1 j
~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ l~e ~ #'~r ~ ~ .~7r►~ ,~va ~ R r,~?~'~~_] ~ ~ , ~
. r ~L , ~ ~ ~ Q ~ . ~ - ~ -
, *i, D ~ ' x~ ` ~
I t ~ ~ ~ ~
~ , l` ~ ~ ; ~ ~ FORtA 84+ ~ . ~ ' , t ~ a~ ~ i ~ tii, . _ ~ °t t~ -
4 .
3354~~90~~ b5~7~~C ~HiLL~~ ~ V~~U~ ~ 33 ~5 , S~~l~ 5~~/4 Vt~~E Pu(~~IP R
t~F ~l~il 4 ~~4~ ~~~3~T ~ i 1 l~~ t/~ ~vE!!4 ~ ~ l~r t~ ~1 4 - - - - - J 5 S l S ~ S~ ~ F N 11 ~ i 14~ ~~T~H AV~
F9tC ~5~5FT ~~'~~,~►~V~ ~rA 992~3~
- PNI ~ R 1Ji~~!'~ 33 25 44 ~~25~T ~JF ~it ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~o ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ t ~c, u~~ ~~►u ~x a~ y, .
~F S11Z C~F h~~14 (lF S~1l4 l~~ l~f~i14 ~~1947'~
33542-9~~~' ?1~~15~786 jiiQMA~ ~ ~M~TH 3~ ~5 44 N1l~ ~i~ S11~ ~~A11 ,~E~U~f~ ~'~I~H~~~LII J~+S~~F~ ~
.~ti~w~.~w , ~ G'f ~I E 114 ~I ~ S E 1/ 4[J ~ N'~I 1/ ~ 113~ ~t 3 6T A 1f ~ ~ 3 T~~
s~~o~~t~~~ w~ 2c~ F~
' ~ r t _
3~5~►2-9~9~ 44~D5~'~C ~C~~i ~C ~IES~`t~N 3~ ~5 ~r4 h~~4 ~F ~Uf ~`aNi4~4P~ R~iL~LIE C
~S 1 4 Q~ S~ll~r ~F ,~Jl~i►+~ ~i~C E1bQ~ G~ P~~~' ~ E% 6~~ ' 4 ~ r ~ ~t c~~ si ~ ~ ~ a~~a~sH R~ ~c ~ . ~ ~ c~ ~ s~~~c~~c ~~zo~
_ ~ , + ~ f ~3~4~~9491 74Q7~10456 H K~AL1C 33 25 44 rV94 OF Elbil ~F ~41~ttLlh '~I(.HA~L M
. N~~4~ ~F 55~8~ SFI14 C~F 5E k/~ ;Vh114 ~X~ CJ it~ E 111~~ A~K! AV~
~R~iKAhE 4~A 99~~+b
~354~-9~]9~ ~'~~i37~p1Q4~b M N~~ALIC ~3 25 44 S~fl~' (~F ~lb~' QF K~.AL~I( M~[,~A~L H ~1~64~ 0~ ~5~8' OF 5~`tI4 DF 5~11~+ ~i~ N1~1J4 ~xC C~D R~ ~~11~'~ A~.~Ct AYE
~ . ~'a~ SP~IKAPV~ h~A 992~b
~~,r~,
} . ~354~-9~A5 T~B~11~~4~~~ ~~IAR~ES G L[T~L~ 33 2a 44 S112 ~F IJEA~ ~EC+~'~D l~~~,~ GHAR~L~S ~
S~~~F~` OF 5~1,/4 0~ 5~11~ ~F rVWl/~r i~~ S 391~ ~C~~I~~S~ RD
t~ S~G~tAN~ wA ~92~6
~~~5~~-~~~4 7b~~13~~~~ ~r~,~S G~trr~f 25 E2~~~~ C~~ si~o~~ ~tr~~~ ~ UF Swll~ nF SEt1~+ ~Jwil4 S~~1~ ~t~WI~I R0~
SP~I~AhE 1~A 99~~6
~~5~+~~9~b7 7~~91~~~~8 ~~~5 ~~T~l~ 2~ ~4 E~~~Ffi ~F S~1I~ ~.I~'~~~ CHARL~S ~
0~ '~~114 ~G~ ~1~1/4 ~~4t~ 518~1~T 5 ~~~4 ~~1r~~IS~I RD
_ ~ SPC~l~Alv~ ~A 9'~~~+~ . ~a ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~~5~+~"~9~~6 77~~~~b$3~8 ~~Nll~C~~CI ~~'AL 33 ~5 44 ~WI14 ~F S~1l4 I ~ i~UNU L! R0~ F~r ~ ~ ~ G~~ ~ ~
i ( ~k OF ~dW114 ~~(G ~240~T , ~~q~ ~rB~~ i~G~fiH~f~CD DR
p \y ~ ~~~J S~y / Y ~/1 S./~ 11~ J J6~V
I P
9 3354~-~9~3 ~51~44~c~5~ J K4~EttING~~ ~1~FY ~~IAP,i~ ~I~ST ADt7 L3 ~~IU ~1U1 ~AV ~K ~ ~ -
~d~r~~ , l 1 183~ 6
9~~ Tb~9Ib~~ 3~ LLAR~D ~~~L'~ J~EY MAR ~IRST A~~7 L~`+ ~2 33 42 1 ~ ~ ~p I~ ~ia i~kJ~ S~AII E~lt
, ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~6~~ ~
~ 33~4~-190'~ 764t0]~1450 ERLIM~ ~30~~K . .~C~Y h~ARI~: FIRST A~~ L5 BZ ~~L~E~IC E~LINu 5
~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~7T~t ~ V~
~F~~~A~E WA 9~~~~
- ~ - _ ; _ - 335~+Z~14Q~ 7~t~C1~9~~~41 J a J~RR~I.~ ~[i~Y ~~Id~t~ ~TI~~I Lb ~2 ~ ~A~~f~i~S, ~ ~I~R~ ~sK
_ ~b ~~~1~ ~ ~vv ~ 137~
~e -
44 RON R~A~KE~ J~~'~ P~1~R i~ ~~Ft~~` AD[~ ~3 ~l, 3~~4~-~~~3 ~i~$~6~~ ~ ~ ~A~C~HAk~S ~TG S~'~?~l ~ ~ ~ , ,
~ Il ~.5` ~3 . ~ ~Oi71Y~Y ~ ~.~,~~~~R ~ ~ P 3 ~~~~Mf~~~ 17~~1~b ~ ~r~a~~~~ c~w~~~s
~~~'i~~~~ ~ - - -
~3542=1~A~+ ~~t~~16p~~~ A 1. p~~~~TRE~ ~ ,~[]~Y ~ARI~ F I~ST L4 F I~? ~i~T ~~V ~k ~4 , , ~ J 7~:~ cfr~,~~ ~ ~ ~
~ 7 ~
_ - . - - 3354~-1~~~ 75~3616~3~5 ,J~~~~ M~L~C~! ,~~EY hfAR~E F~~~T ADD L5 ~1. f~UT ~A~1 8K
~ r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 134i~ ~ ~ 3~
- ~ _ - ~ -
r~ ;7~~ #J ~ J. ~;C_}°~x I ~ rfi , J,-~,. I e iit5~ A~~ia Lt~ t~1 1~~ F~~ S#~L S~~ 3~~t~ ~ 1 ~
~ !r ~ ~ ~''`4 i 3 ~ I 4 31 ~ ~ ~ ~ s~
. ~ ~
I~~ES~~ J~~Y ~MARI~ A~~ L1 B~ SH~~tWut~~ E~ ~(~B~i~TS 3~~4►2-~}3f~1 Tb~~13~~(~~ ~C ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 71 1
r ~ ~ ~
f ~ ~ f ~ Y MA~ i E AC~ L~ r~ !~(~LIn~~L~L CO 3~54~'03(~~ 7'6~42~Q~~ T~ ~Y~E ~ ~~E~K JC~
- ~ ~I45t37~1~
- ~ ~ S~E~w4.~~ ~ ~C'~E~~S ~
3~54~-03~}~ 764505~29b ~1 54lV~ER~ JCEY ~^~A~IE A~~ ~3 ~ +t~ 1~U 3~~9,~
~ i ~y .~6 f
~ - F J~~Y "~ARIE A(l~J ~~~ILId~CI~ ~L[7R~N~E ~~5~+2-~~r~QS C~~7~~ ~ [i.iBfCK
E ~l3t~6 ;~~T~f A'~~
SP~I(A~i~ wA ~9~~}b
~4 A ~ K 0 ~ , ~~I H Jf~EY ~lARI~ Aa[~ i.~+ ~1 LZNC t~T 5 V ~J354Z-~a4Q4 740~~,4~~CM~ C~ ~ IC Ob ~{32.~ 4 8 Q
f~ 3 ~ - -
~ ~ ' H1 ~i~It;HI~LLt Jl]SE~H F 3~54~ ~4(l3 3~4297C € M~GN~ Elli , JGEY MAkI ~ A~3~ ~.3
~ 11~~4 3bT~! AVE
S~UKA11~ N►A 49~Ob
~
~A~ ~~tU i~f~ C~i~f~l.~~ E t~ 7'~ J~~IIGHI~LL ~ J~~Y i~Akl~ A~~ LT 1~~C ~D ~~54~-(~4Q7 ~~.4 ~ C
E~.~' ~LK I rV 1~14 ~'~1~~5 RD A WA 99'~D6 SPI~Ii hdE
~
' a~ c,~~ - 5~ 47 ,l ~"~~CHIELLI JC►~Y ~lAR~~ A~~3 ALL LT 1~ ~E~~1 ~EC~I~'~ # iA~R TC1,~ 3354~-0~~►E~ . ~ ~ G
_ ~ 41t~ 36~~1 AVE E14 QF LT ~ ~~K ~ ~ 1~
s~u~~►~~ w~ ~~zo~
Af~ A AMAY JQ~E~' ~AR I E AGC L4 9~r ~ TL~ ~91J]' S~V ~Z 3~54~-~~04 ~95182C T E~ T l ~ 1 ~~~42 b
~ 11 ~.'l~a~.~~,,~ c 1 . ~
~ T 5311t] J 1~ S~HhlIGK _ J~~Y I~ARIE A~~ L~ SGH~1C'~ J~I ~354~ ~~~3 ?~?~1
~ 1~~25 ~+~~H AY~
- SP~I~A~~ ~A
~ K ~M~~'~ _ JO~Y ~ARI~ ~~~7 ~';MITH ~IAkI'~M _ . 3354C~0~~~ ~~4~4~3C ~A R~~I _ ti~~ ~~r4~~
5P[~I~AN~ I~A ~9,~14
~ ~ . - -
C RA ~Y ~A~ i~ ~ 1~4 AC~uh~L~A ]'F~~h~AS h~ ~354~-~~~1 ~r~~L~3C J~IITE~] C~N~ CT JC
~ ~t~~~ ~~r~ av~
~~z~~
~/~~i~r~ ~ar~~~ ~
3~~~~-~1~1 ~~~9a7L ~AM~S R CaiN~~ J~.~Y ~~.4~IE A~C ~1 Ei~ ~ 11411 ~fi~H A1J~
- - - - - SP~+~tA~~ v~A ~~20~
5 R~' kiARD ~ H 1CK~ ~C~Y MA~I ~ A~G ~L~ d3 ~Af~GS~Ak~S ~I~G ~~~~z-c~~a~ ~€~~avr~z~ ~ _ ; ~ _ - - i5+~~1Ti
r~. ~~~r ~ .
- ~ A~
~ !7 '~~h~ ~~-25-44 N~1I4 ~LA~fi~~3 i~~A~? '~~~.~+~~J ~U~SGH~E ~~]G ~3541-~~.11 b~'~5~~4 ~ [~1S = - ~ ~T~1 . ~t~ 7 H~Y ~ 7
r~ f~? 4 l ~j ~I~ ~I~GKafl~ ~iA ~~~06
~ ~ A L~ME~t ,1 A ~G ~ ~ - - 1 79~1 75154 ,I~CK ~ PA~.M~R ` MI A;~'~ i.~ l~~ ~~~41 ~~L Q1
~ 36~]~ ~~W~~~N RD
5~'GKA~IL: wA '~~2+~~ _ ~
~
S ~.R. ~~IV~t~Y M1~I~~1ME AD~ L1~ ~~~IT~EY ~~iVI~ ~ ~ 3~~41~-4~ 12 19i~418~3'~ r ~ . ~F 3C~~iQ~SH R , e _ .
. . . - ~ . _ _ . . . Y ~l ~ J ~F ~F. f~~ ~A 9 ~~b
~ ~ ~ y f
~ ~I ~iZ G~'t ~w~ST~~N 5~~, . 335~1=0~~3 T8~~17'7~~±~ ~I~,~~S ~ ALL~°~1 ~1[~~~.~ 'E A~'~ L~.3 ~ . - - - - _ ~
~~~1~ ~t~~U
s~+ Y~ . Y ~I
" d~ I~ i L`~ A l7 ~ L 14 t~,~ ~,r ~`fll ~ l~ U l 5~t 3 3 5 4 1-~ C 1 4 T 7~~ 1 D 4 M~__~ i~ 7 T H 4~'~ L L,~ _
, . ~G~I~IISM k~ SP~KAP~~ ~A 99~~b
,
t' ~ ' i ~ ~~ill~ci~E~IBERG HE~~~RT ~TAL
3354~, ~Z1~ 7~4~~~5~~"1 ~ SLWL~I~[~~R M~~JIl.C~i~~ A~!7 L~5 t~~ E ~59~9 RLWAI~ AV~ ~ ~ ' ~
N~i~f~+~~V LAKE '~A 9~0~5 ~ .
0
~ iViNY ~iL~. J 335~i1~~~ l f~ L~67~~ D R J~HNS~hI, SR. M[ f7 t~.i]~E A~D~ ~ 3.6 ~ i~A~.~G ~
dV 71U Ak~;GI~N~ ST
~~'LKAG~~ ~rA 9~~04
~GH~.E~JD€k~ ~UG~~E L 33~41-(~Z17 7~~~~'~t~Z45 E L ~'C~iLEiV~~~ ~IL~~1 ~1MC A~~l (.1T 3l ~
~ 62i~d I7T~f I~V~
SP~~(A~f~ wA '~9~~b
~ ~
~ R~tT ~I. ~~W~~~ ' MI~~LO~IE A~~ Ll~i R2 ~~~r~D~.~ f~Ql~~kT ~ 33~41-~~ 1~ 78fl418~T~44 " ~ ~i~14 dA~ES ka
4'~ 06 ~~~~A~~ WA 2
1
, 1!7~L~~I~' ADD L~~ ~2 TY~.ER ~AR11~I~ JR 3~541-i~~~~ 78~~~8~~ff9 aMARYI~V TY~.ERt ,lf~ ~ r~
S 3+~1~ ~Ai~S
~PGKAfV'~ ~A 99~qb
. F F ~ ~
~ S~~F~LDT ~ MIaI~~~l~ AIQfI L1 ~E L~i G ~~541-~D~~1 7~~~17 971 ~ C ~ ~1~~~ 3TTH A~E
;F''C1KA~~ 1~A 99C~~
. r= I~I ,
' .4~~~~ VS~~~ ~ ~ ~ a~~~~r~ ~ ~c~v,~~_~ ~rat~.~~~ a~~~ ~ 33~~r~.-43[~. ~~);~1 ~
E 115~t~ 37~'~ A~"~ J~ SPL~AN~ ~1A ~'9~t4
~ ~ ~
J~ Y~ r 1 y { i T r p 7 - j r~ 7" 1 r ryry ~ ~ ~L~~~4~~ J~~~~1~~1 ~1~ ~~1'+~
7 ~ ~Y ~ U ~ 41 ~ d ~ ~ ~ i ! ~ J 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ V , _ ~ ~ _ - 1 ~Q~11 ~ ~I~
1
A F GR~MM~T M~~I.~ME A~D L4 ~3 ~~M~R~1CC~ ~ R~~fR~S 7~~ol~~ls rHa~ ~ ~ _
~1J6~ ~ 7~v 1~ q~,~~~ ~1
. 1.33 3HM oF
LAND FILE POLL. CARDS NOV 0 81978
xEQusa:M Hz fl~alux o v i c-
PHOIS 22o Z5
CHARGE--T0:- --(5901~L.~9.8~A~ DATE
PR+OJ3~G't
rc Co G E SEC. i T. Q. Q, 8Lf{,-lOT K
~ L 4 S ~ 7 ~ ] io 13 ~ T,',
L13,3412 0 8 3
,241 " 'nooloollillillillillIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillillilllllllllI
.
. -69 1 -90 7
, - - - -
, 6 9 1 i - 9 t~ - - - - - _ .
-
69 1 - D 9D"
r i ~ o s
G~i ~ • D "
, Kev~unch ocis
~ Q 1 • Q ~ CAr17_ ~ icnn~nL/GOf12~ _ .~,c.'. •
Charge to: O10 ~
9.DIg,~ col. 1 ia a quota mark ( nuraeric "x" ) .
~ ~ col9. 2 - 4 is conatant "691"":-y~
~ ~ coli. 5 - 13 ie numer.ic_ with blanka- nocsptable
Do not zero fill.
col. 14 is a quote mdrk (num,eric "H",) :
~ 9 ~ . • ~ ,9 ►o3 ~ -
_ 6 3 ! - I ~1 D ti
. Identify and separate batches for computer room.
ob must be com leted no later than two (2
Th~s ~ ' p - )
days after receipt.
_ -
sJ6 a I Forward data to the computer room for processi ng.
71 ~
•43 1 Return these sheets to the P1 anni na Department
u. 1 eti on of Keypunchi ng; attenti on of:
<Qr_4 S e c t To
, ,-Ilool .
. ~
69 L , ~ ~ -p,3,p3,~
S 1119
~ G 9
• CodinQ ezamplea
i -0
sEr. 1r, a. o. aLK.-LOT
S C. 1 ? ?~9 10 13
~
3. 2,~.~ AA- J, 0 L Parce 1:lumber 32 5l.1-~0l on3~y~
b 9 ► ,
Z o i-0 O. Parcel numbere 32541-0800 thru 3251...-:~0'9
C 9? Parcel mimbers 32541-0800 thm. 32541-0899
Mg I/4 ot aec. 32, twp• Z5, rgs.
All of aec. 32, tvo. 25, rge. 41~
,
r„J,.~,~ A 1? of twp. 25, rge • 4.~
811 og rge. 44
Sectfone vithin
Tovnahip~H.a► e
ob I a4. o oz ol
• ' ~ 07 {04 I0 1 I31,12
-~L/,--~ 18i1'TI~b 15F14I13I
1i20121►22 2312.4
, •D;Z~~~~ 30129128127 b 2
31 W I 6
~
,
691~
y; - ~ ~
6 ~ l I - •D,z,1
Quarter eections
~ b 9 ► - Q Z, 1, ~ vitlt3a _aect.ion
~ ~ I
_.9 o t 1.013.0 3 4
q I 0, 3 D ~
,
r t1