ZE-34-71 - - -
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
~A WQ)N%-fj ,
Being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That at times mentioned herein he was, and
now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident
of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of
twenty-one years.
SA"SV(1~d~~d 0~NQA6`~ ~G 1qq„p
That on
he personally posted a~:rue and correct copy of
the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at
the following location in Spokane County, to-wit:
r
C0 P " eif- Wr Y Co P4 "F iA CA Oco,-
~0J!b4M8 R-OA0 N l3A.'M Co PWISCAOF ADANV-7"
00,
~
'
_t
l A~p~icant or Agen_
' Subscribed and sworn to me
19IML.
~
7
'009
L . i
l NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Residing at Spokane, Washington
J
ArcoA coMPMv
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
WEST 521 FIRST AVENUE • SPOKANE WASHINOTON 98210 * TEI.EPHONB (SOO) 639-5281
CHARLES U ANDERSON
VICE PFiE510ENT AND COUNTY MANAOER
Re: C-138754-31
To: Spokane County Planning Department
Gentlemen:
We have made an examination of the assessor's tax rolls on micro
fische in our office subsequent to December 7, 1979 1
and find from such examination, the enclosed copie s of the owners
and taxpayers located within 400 feet of the property described
below.
DESCRIPTION
~
A portion of the North east k of the North west k of Section 23, Township 25,
Range 44 defined as follows; Beginning at the intersection of the west line of
Adams Road and the south line of Sprague Avenue and the True Point of Beginning,
then South 601.44' then West 393.93' then North 60' then West 466 07' then
North 561.81' to the South line of Sprague Avenue then East 845' more or less
to the point of beginning.
.
Certification: I hereby certify that the following list of names and
addresses consisting of the following 13 pages has been prepared from
the latest available re rds and is to the best of my knowledge correct.
Signed ~y ,i~~~ for Pioneer National Title Company
~
Ddt e
/ ~ ,
PAUL A CLAUSEN ~
TELEPHONE
,THOMAS H 9ROWN i
8249219
r~ f CLAUSEN & BROWIV I
A7TORfVEYS AND COUNSELORS
SOS FIDELITY BUILDING
SPOKAIVE WASHINGTON 99201
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Please note item B 4(ZE 34-71) and
map This notice of hearing is given in
compliance with County Plan Commission
instruction
CLAUSEN & BROWI
Attorneys for Safeco Insurance Co
of America
> >
BY :Patft A Claus en
I
R i
1
E C E IE
I
~ AN 2 51°80
SPOKANE COUN ~E~T
PLANNIl~G DEPART
Parcel No s 23541-01544
23542<-9064
23542-9!068 -
_ l
a
AGENDA, FEBRUARY 7, 1980 TELEPHONE N0.• 456-2205
SPOKANE COUiVTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ~
Place Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
I
9 00 A.M.
A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS CONTINUED
1. ZN- 2-57 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE
(Southeast corner of Wall Street and Country Homes
Boulevard. Section 19-26-43)
Proposed Use• Retail/Offices Applicant NORTHWOOD PROPERTIES, INC. (5.42 Acres) ~
2. ZW-172-79 AGRICULTURAL TO FREEWAY COMMERCIAL AND RESTRICTED
IPJDUSTRIAL
(Approximately at the Northwest Corner of Medical
Lake Road and Hayford Road. Section 1-24-41) ~
a Proposed Use Motel/Restaurant/Industrial Uses
Applicant C and T INVESTMENTS (29 Acres)
B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
3. ZW-239-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME
(North side of 6th Avenue at Beeman Street, Airway Heights. Section 23-25-4-1) - 'Proposed Use• 30 Mobile Home Sites
, bpl i caat • E GREEN WEST 16.1 Acres ) 4. ZE- 34-71 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR CUMMERCIAL ZONE
~ (Southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and ~ Adams Road. Section 23-25-44)
Request• Omit the Condition for a fence between
Second Avenue and the Milwaukee ~
~ Ra i 1 road trac ks , i ~
AppUcant: SAFECO
5. ZE-199-77 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONE
(Southeast corner of Argonne Road and
Knox Avenue, extended east. Section 8-25-44)
Request• 1) Omit a Condition requiring finalization
of Zone Change wi thin one year, of Spokane
County Planning Commission's approval.
2) Approve new revised Development Plan.
Applicant: AMERICAN WEST (1 Acre)
12•00 NOON - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Nearing)
1 30 P.M. RECONVENE
- - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - , - - - - - - - _ ~
7 %we \
4 I `1►- ~ ` \
A v E CQ A'DFR
e _ - . _ " _ ~ ; - A"1 ~ - w •
~ 0
Q ~ $ EN E. '
5.a~e , l1 1
~r A ' 8 • ~ _ !
e e-.- ~ . . ~ 2 ~
J ' N o TV` a lk
~ ~ j ~ Q ~ ~ - - - ` ~ ; ~ ~s'o .f~►
•
ao ~
i
i ~
' a ~ - UsTA n ~ ~ . ~ P aN ~~a ~
0
tA ~ ' 0, a M A ~ ` ~ ~ • I
~ 0141►L. a
~
Y ~ ~w
pj m A!! E
~
t Fire
~ ~1 oqress~ s.•. . 5 P`o• ~ a-'In
Y ~ Sc hoo z
- - _ -
' lr >
<
IW ,
VALLEYW~ ~ @• ~ ~
y w A v ~ . . . . -
; - - ~
Z Q d1 [t~,~`~J - Z
! W - _
~ = W ~.~M ~
r.~..a..v . .i . u' 1 A1 m ,kAA ~ ~ a Ri i ~ - -
~ ~ .
b
~ ~ 'J ~ y A+Vt _ i
~/71~1 1 - 5P RACA i t
i . . i . . . -
N o '
G •
0 2312
\01
VEI~ 'DALE
' " ; ' i
L --_4~'_, va._
_ . ~ A`/ E,.
rc+.r StM- i i~, N~ •
f cf IOCho~
1/ E M , W Sc6►oof ~ po
♦ 1 ~ ~ r T
Q . ar L.~ffqr~ ~ 1 ~ '
a. ~Q v
f!- 7 TH ;P i1. ~ s • 3
, IA
1 ~
~ • ~ ~j - I~ - ~ 6 TM A /L I
Q 6~ rt ~ T w ' o~rw
r W ~
f a /y ~
MO ! ! , J sA
~ ~ "~'f 1f~9 !1M Y ~w I ~n4ro'Tkp111
7 T M A 4 T t►~r 7 Y 4. ~ 'V , t'~ ~ .
~ - - -
Q ' ~CHO ~ . Pl f ieiY
~E ~ o ~ H ~ • ~ •
. ~
a '
IGNT r+ A~E
,
. ~ -v~T..';~.:•~ _ . . ~ ,8~ T~-~ 1Y-
_
~ a C 1!
~iG'H -
10 of
a
• . ►
E 12 7" N
, L ♦ ~ ~ ~ + a Y
r}` 4 n ~ ~
E ~ N Tt w'~ ~e
m, 101 v~~~~ -
E ~
J13 TH a ~ TEENTAN 'j'•I , 14Yh
. ~ s-~
.
-
A
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ■1' i ~F ~ ~ J . ' _ 4.v
r~ y1I
1
Y
"'~1 ~)..~I `A~-- ~ ~'Rr•~e~-- - - ~ ~ _ . ~ '1~
rH~ ~ t
, r 'i ~ ✓
Y -
~ M M r .I ~
'
t ~ ~R
t4
r f t ~ ~
. ' I A ~i* ' ~ ! n
.
~ r
Tti
r
. ; ~
.
; ~ .
, . ~
} •
I L v
.
w, r
I 1
A
t,
~
~
,
~
4T s
•
.D . . - ~1
~ 7~
a~ x ~
. . , ,
14~
~A
.
.
w
~ .
. . ~.s . , . _ - .
-
-
~
. AN,
.
. • ui .
~
\
'
~
<~k,~y,~ :~-'c" ~'~•1 ~ ~
~ , . . t'~,~ r
' • '
„ 1 Y ~ k
i n 7 . _ . _ . ~ .
~
r
~
9... ~
Al~
~i
~
~ ~ , ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ x
:A"
, .
,
I x 4.,
- , ~ . , ~ . . _ . .
w
• ~
.:F •'1 'f '~1 ~~iyy~. M ~ ~ r Y . . ~ ~ _ . ,._~h':, y~.. ~ ,...',:..yj,*:i, JI•"0
a , ati'~ • ~ ' `
a .
~ . . ~ . , ~ ~ . , . ,
' ~ ~ ` 7 , a+:tr(.` ' ¢ ~ .'''f,'.?" , , r, ~ ~ . . . . • , . ~ . .
11~. . ~ y~.~ dy`!L~.~~3w~wY 1{~w~T I~'~'•'`~%~ 4ir~ ~ . . . . . ' . ' , _ ~rM . .
. y'l~ ~kr{~~~.n ~r. i~~, , , . • . . . . . ~ , , , r 'a ~
I 4
' r Af ~ ~ ~ t~ . ~i . . . . . • - ' "
k ~ 4~ r ~ ~.3~i „ a~ ~ t~.,~, t ~tr' ~ . . ~ ' ' ~ ~ E"►I
~ ` ~ jy l r~►~6 ~,ic ~ ~ N } . I. ~ . . , . . , , . . , ♦ . ~
, :N 4 'y ~ . " 1 f~ ~ • y ~ , .,A Y . .
. ~ ~ ~ ; 4~ ~ :1}~ o . ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ' . . . . ~ ~ ~ + , j ~ 'yE ~ • ~
. , r . I~'~.: ~ , rr ~:-i' ~ •.~r i . . , . . . . ~ "i . 1'' M . .r
. . ..,,rr'js.~"ti~tY~~ H _ ' ~ . , ~ . ~ ~ ~l4 .~s ~ Rih 't' ~
~ -e.'._y ' . .
f ~ •
~ r~•~Q~'s-
~ ✓
4,•tfC,;
~
~ ``r[ ,.."'~`,i,"r' , : l ~ - t 4 - ` ''•1• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . 't'~r ~ M
i t
t :i
. . . _ :z _ 4 ~ -F~•..-.- ,
l r
_ . , ---a.--"
~ , , _ '
- _ _ - . ~ ~}k~~. _ _
JU L F-
. 1 .r ° . ~-C~ . • . 4 ! ~ ~ i
't ` r'.'n'12. ' + ~ , - yt A~,~~~ -
0CtAa, !0
• , . ~
• ,
j ~ • ,.a~ t r ~ _ -
~ 7~ ► , ~ ~ f_~+~nr~ ~ +{`e~
1 •
1 a r-...y~,~ . ~t ' . • ~ . . .
t[T,.. ■r ~ ~ ~ ~ ` M
im
Y 1~ f .
~ ~ f * L;1!
.
i~~ ~ " _ ' " _ ~ / ~ `r'~ T~ 5 ' 1:~ "r. ~ .Y► . ~ p-^.
• ~ . . _ ' ' . _ _
~.;.,~y . ~ . . ~ . . . - . . _ , . . . . . . . ,
_ . _ ~ . i - _ ~.~v.kr-,• ti ' ~ - . . . - ' . ' - . ~ _ _ . . . . . . . ~ . _ •.r+.` _ .
. _ . . . ..r_..~
- . - . . .
. - ~ . :~aa.F~ ~'s,~
- - . .~.:~G...; . • _ . - . . . _ . , ~~n _
' -r ~ . . . .
~ S:w'r.,~G*r~:'.i"A'„1N ~r~~~l.•. _ . ~n ~ , ~ ..~,~."s.,.i~-°~`~~..~ r~i~":~ sr =74 ~r'...~ .L-`_- `y~i-,r:-'~"-aA..~, id'. k - ~ -
.
. .7 . ~z~ ~ _ . , . _ . . . . . . r'.. - ~ - ~.'Sr . _ . _ . . _ ,"~~'-.fe~'~a.l~ .p'l -
. .
_ . '
.
. ' : , . .
. ~ . y
._v. . . . ~ . ~ . . ; . . ~r~
, .
• ' ' " ~ ' • " . _ . ~ `r
.
. y~ v, • ~~.y,~. ~ L _
r~ - ~~,e' . ~y ~ K~ ~ ~p~
+x'~:• ~.y s~ ~ `y'r, ~ . ~ .i •ti~«,~,. . ~ '1.- r }w Y.Y#+~~ ~ ~'-~Y s y~`~~~ .
1_.v
' ~~v~ ` .r Si~~:. _ :..:xr~ _t~'_..:~'2 . _ . . • C+. ~ . . ' _ _ b,+i~y, ss -
g ~
) C~ ~.f' 4 v!(_ K , .r' y . . ~ ~ ~ / ' J /
, / I 'ti` , ~ ~L~ V / ~1~~ ` i-~/ I~~w~o ~/I~
) ` / ~
` L -
414
✓
~ ~i. ~ ~ . . .
~ .
. 9 Lp,..
, r r ~~~~tt1N~tY'.t:.Jri.s~.rvrY~l, X', f . - . . , . ' . ~ J~..' ~•r +f~~~~G~F~~~.~ . t
4 i id`y~,
,v4,
, t~ ~'~i`f . • ~.c`t,r ~ '.•a'~ f , y . ~i` . . ~ t .2~ r~~}~ F C.' 4 I
: ~~~~.jA' 1':; ~ l, t h ~1 '~`~t} ~,'i ; :,~r 4 4 '"'f•!~. "1.S ' ~ , '~"ki~ t.
41,'h. ~ . . N~ ~i/~~; ~...I ~A~'t'~ \i i f ~ 'A ~ ~i, h..A•y`1 t~-.p,,~~..a~~`i.~~~'i~ ~'L"1~~,.,~ t 1
~f.l., •..k ~~~~~i1Y ."~.~5+ '~tC.~r..t5 ~'S ~'Y~~ S4 ~.r,.~.;~+. a,' ,.d.~Ar~,,~~,~4~f ~f~.:, ky~,^r~Cy.l1•y(~;Sy~, ,ri"~y w;~,
'l? •R.~~ 41~~117i- ~ k''~ „t>>i1A'r r s• s-~A~.~~ 1a"}!~r° 4 7 - " .
~;'~r'~k~a.. ~ ~ ~t~ ~ , f ,rti ,'ty N ` *~tis~: ~kr , ~t; ~ '~'~~r.~„~` g,t„
.e` i, r.° • , : ~ . cw a t,,c ~y ZU'~#;3 ~ , fi~i,.~'t,.,,~~i i~. ~ . ~~1'~`~r } ~k
• ~y~.. 4.~ 1 r~Y~!~ ~~ti~ ~ a . . ` ,~A{ia = ri Y ~ ~ t 'S~t4~G'~/~yi~t,~ 1 ~5,~, ~F~~'~~i.,~10~-e. i;`~ .
~i h {,Ir 11' , ~ . ~ rW~= + r . , i~~F.'t . t4 s ~ ' .y'{ ~+a .b f ~ ►p,~ y ti~` , u~as"M1~ ~ 5 i~,~ t ~'1! I ~i~'~,a,~~,,1 tj,~Fr"7~r !CP. .yt~ti ~~T~L ~ 7~e
~
'r ~,~~~1~'~'~'+~".~.'~ MF" a~•ri"#IA4Mr'~+ ~ ~tii~p 1(~t ~W~ e F, ~ ~ ~ ta►~;:~~' D r,j ~~1. µ S f ~ 1 4. 1 ~ ~~1
~ t}~i,r ~i i . . ~ i~.a~i ~ r'~ ~lM.,jµ ~ :a ~ ::L '1 ~ ~KYT'r ~~yv, 3~ 7~; r , 7 , ~ • '
~ r~~ * ' ~ - . Y i. . ti <~SA~ 'a' . ~ . 1:YW/4~" b ~.i ° 'Lti'~M. . E.' ) ~ . ~`q til•;t1~ }y.-.':ty~ , v~'~i ~ 4 yr, ~
.
,
Wi.rrtTi
~ ~ 1 J ~ x 'k ~ ~.1 IM1 t t. ~ ~M-. . . ~ . ~.i ~~~#jts~ w . 'i.i ♦ •
~ ~ A1?+, ~ V L ~•'i~4~yt~r7 h T I~~ . fi'~, ;..1. 4 Ay ,x~~,, y~ .A
s~~~3+~►_,' ' - _ . ~''~tk'~1. ~ ~
Ol/ S ' ~awc - .
Q
r~~`'a~'~ o d'
~
~
, ~
~
s
c
,
000
t
\
~
~
FcS17ARr,~
rf•
1.. \
'
Y
i
.
i
, ~ ~ii~ ' ^ ~ • ~ ~
y
,
' Y
,t.~ r -
~ ~•„riw. ~ 4 ~ ~ i ~'.r
r . .
Aw
a .
.
. J
+olE"~i~,S
~ ~ , • ~111
~
ul •
•
. .
. . - . . . •
. ~ ~ .
. '~•'~"K=j , ar~r`rt
. ~.t ' Y 1 ti.• .
a t 1 . k ♦ S r .,w~ r k L,'~ : ~
:4'r~~ t ~0 i , a ~ 'r' y n ♦ ~Ai k ehl. ~k
~y~., t
♦ r • + i ~~''~'{,~c
--:A. ~1. ~ ~ - a'M~'„~1• 4"}~ t k,~y , , + i
q
, . ;p~tu~}.1~. 4,'~...w ~.ar.. ~ a. . 'i~YR~~y7~~!
li'[ a. ~ ~•~r •ac:~, ~ '
, .x
. • ~
. y",'.
.
~pe
o
~
. ,
,
1 „ ~ ~ .
~
~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ w 't'~''~ f'~, ~ h ~
t h ~ i
~ ~ . ' ~ h~,~i ~ ~ ~ I
.i~4i, f
i YK4.
' ♦ t " ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ s
~ ~ ; ~ , , j,;i ~~t~ ~ , ' a, ~ M1
~ ~i 'y h
.M1 k ~a~~j, ~A S♦ ~I v~~. ~
, -y
4kti~
.~~'-•~~_,ia;,-
1 '~'~~~,^rM~n 6 ~ ' d ~i~~~~~~~
11 ~ ! I+ ~
r 1 I -
. s• y '
ma
, . . \
~g • 1' ~
s° -
-tWt' StY :t?Pt
lwr4A:iaa~..~.-►--~...... -
; . . . . _
r : z: . . _ , . , . . .
.
. ..;v~ . . . _ . . .
. .
. . - t-,~..~_•..~. . . _
i
.
a~
~
. T ~
: .f._ .
, . ~ . _
~ . , _ :ti~.., . . . . . . . : . . , ~ , ' :Ae .-f ~
77
v r.~~h
p } yT . '1 . ~r~ ~ a~-,A~, ~-~Q~ ~4~ • .
k~T~"~~, w G ) ~
4K
1 yA~~ ~ , ~ . . - ; l .l 1 ~ ~ .t*~+f+'~~•.,,.. .
~ '~T~ •1 , ~ 3 ~ : ,
• . . . ~ , , . ' e ~1~^~ ~Yr+~~~,~,5~~'•"4,~ ~~•'1x~ ~•~;i Zy'r}~--~~,~~ ~~i a~!.!
- . ~ ,.~',1~Y~y' t 'CV~+1, ~,,~vt~H ~~.~~f LL~w~~~T,~4 ~ ,~r ~•'~'t'~
~ f°
. ~3~a -5'
,So,~~a'~
I
~
. _ r .
r, . ~p~ ~`'"•i"
~ ' ~Y" • ~ . : . f ; = " .
77
_ , . - _ . - I ~ i ~ •.y~ ' ~ ~ . a, ' ' ~
_ ~ F . . + r 'ti • ~ .
v~t ' ~ ~ , ~~~r j ~3 l\.+
' } % jt ' ~ , • i!' ` , y~ , ~
~ f~r + ~ f ` ~ y~'~` zna ~
~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ •
ii..-
.L ~ .'f~.' i•
~
,.'.f • ~ ' •1
Y
_ v+
, , `
.
~ ~ • M •
3 I
~
.
'
~
, • . ~ • ~ d ~
~
_ ~ ...~r - ~
~ ~y+
~ • ~ f~ . ~ . ' . ~ "W ~ , . • • • ' '
r ~f1,•~~ . . _ ~~.~.~T" . S \i!A'-L '~f - . . . . . • . . . . . . . . _ . - /
{ ~ :S~ ~ ,f~:~e4Mh" ~ • . . . . . . ' . ~ . . . ' . . . . •
, ~ . ~ - • ' , . : ~ ; ~ - : . . M : "~dR r~Y . .e :>>.>•-va;' -
~ .
. • " , . • , . ' ~ • ~ . , , ,ri• a : .
, . . ' . ~ _ . _ ' vf~t~„~J ,~r~!yp: _ ~~y.fj~~~• r ../'~~*Y~'= ~ t •t~lo
• ~ , ' . ' . ' , . _ :,~y~~!. ,t~T~'~.', s~ ~tu~,,~ ~~,~tJ►~
' !r . . . . . . . • , . , . , ~ ~i~i _ ,,Y~~' Ni~ y~ri , \
T' r . . ~ . . ' . . ' . . r ' ,t' i f . ~ ~ .4 •i
~ 'i:y ~ u
T ~ . . , . . . t~ t ~ 't t ~ rt . ~ .L Z
a ~ ' . , ~ ~1.:. _ . . .'y.t..s.....".r,.. ~i'..,...i~CiA+. r.i....... +.,a~csJ13A' : 1!`l
. ~ ' .r~} ~ 'r~- ' ' . - . . _ . . ' • , . , - , . . . - . _ - " . - - ~s ~c1:t~
i
~
. ' -Y ~ ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
, . . 1;
• • • " r
" . -;1r ;i.t ~ r., ~ .
Y•„ ' ~ i
' j ~'j, f.t` ~ t
•t ~Y a
* a} ( + ~ ~r,
~1'~ p`~ y~ ~ ; ~ ` , 44- ~1li~ ~ ~ , ~C~ .
,'R.i~ ~;•i~ ~ ' i ~ i Ap~`i
`i ~ •=1;' 'ti ~i~ a -i T ' rF'f.`.,~r.',~ ~ y,,.
ti~
ti ~1~'•
.r.. .1 - ` ;'si`` i • , . ~
~i.fi''~1 ~ , ~5~~~~ i?~ . ~
R'~~,t!„`'~~
,
; .
~
. . ,
~
,
J ~„r'"';~~• _ ~ ~ ~ ~ yy ~ ._L ~ ~ ' - --r
,
, . _ . .y,K _ > "S' ti 'r. '►`;;s:.t ~r~~-~ 4 ~ .
~ Y . . ' . .~r' ~ ~
~ ' ~ . • -
~ _ - yF M ,~~"'~a~~a... ~ 'e',• . ~.5~ ~ ~ --r
~ . y w ~ ' + .
..Wv.J~ ' ~ .•t • _
'fX'~ ~it.i,~. ` •i i, ~ _...^~.-ttiS~ ,~~~y~`~ s - 7\ ~
~ ~r~ ,`~.y F~,~. •.1~ , ~ . . .
~ + ~ { ~ ~I ~~~I f~
, ~L.. r~ _.r~:~'~ ~ ~..-Tw.~. ~-~.'li'd F,•`-...~
' ~ .
. . v. ~
A .
. ' . ,,~a . '
„ . .
r~A -4k,'Y_ - . _y ' _ _ '
t^ :i
.
.
' . ^e.~ ~ . - . . ~
, _ ,
. ' . ' . . . ~ .
_ I~~
. . . ~F.~..- ~ ~ 'i~~l r~'1: 1 r _ . '~i •y fs ~
. - . , ~ • , . . ~ ' ~ ~ . . ? • '4
_
_ . . .
.
r..T{ ~ ~'°~:.a . j~... ~ ♦
Y~_ . . . . . , . . ~ . . ~ . ~ Y - ~ . . . .~'4F~ - . . ' ~ , .
s. - . `
;
•F.~• 'o ~ , - ~ . ~ . ' ~
~ 34
• _ _ . . ~ . ~ ~ ..-axv ~ y
. . ' . ' ' . . . . . . , . ~ . ~ ~ _ . . . . . . ~ ~ . . ~ i.. ...~..~v~.~ . S: ~._i~..-t~ s ,.J'.++'.. L •
. . . . ~ .
~ ~ L~(! ~.r ~ ~
~ (f/
~~w~~
~
Y s
- t • ~ •1 ~~+-ri J ' L J - ~ '
. . ~I . : ~ J _ •
L~ ~ ~ - . ~ • ~
~
1 • ~ j T
,K. . r.
Y ,
7
H
~ f. ♦ ~ i ~ i : f , - " , ~ . . _ t • . • ~`•F1•
~ _
i - . . r. . . , . ~
~u
, . . . _y . . F _ _ a f~' . .-e~~ _ _ - "
a .d
~ -
. . . . _ - ~ . .•:J2~- - ~ + .~~~i' ' -
~ +k .;•'r„L~. .r ~ i l..- ..L.r..- w .r?.Y 'V'~~; ~ ~ f.."°ry '~',M~ {.',H ~.~'l~A~~,p~~`*•, tr~.~ ,~.a'~, ~ t ~ t.~F.tk,~}'~a[ ~ , ~M~-.'~t
~rt -..'-'1+~~a`~'~'~r~~"~'.,...:a .L . • - - 7 ~ r~s~~~v..~.t.~.~q . - -Y+..r~,...~ p~~. ± ~
.~*+"'S-• • . ,.;4~ ~ .~.':,ww.,:.
.Y~-....- ~
~ ~~~i~-r•"~ ~-.1 _ ; . ' ' . - - ' t+~' r. ~:~7~ ar ~ : T .i.'r !~a xi ~ . . , . .
. ~ • + _
^ .r ~ . ~ . : ~ky . = f Sr. !
_ ~ . . . ~:a~ l, - ,~ii.. Vt ` T ~',~t~'Y'1~ A i ~,~.'Q~. '.j_,i~ . ~
~ ~y.• .4., ..L~'• _,.i'
.y
L
~
I.
. ; ~
sy ~t~'.. ''1 ~ + J~ f .
~ ` ~ `
- . ~
_l~~
r , r.
= t ,~1~~ ~ ' ~ '
~ ~ '~d -
~ y`.--- ~ ' ~ `r ~
~ - - ' t w'• • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ` j -e' .
_ . + ~ -l ~ , ~ ~ p~'~
' l
. y "„~a Id-~ • ~ . ~ ~ y,`
~7r ~ - %
~ , r _'T ~h. ~ . ~ ` _ _
~ f'~'4 .
~ ~~i f . .f
' ~ h~ ` `r7'
~
` t
' 1
~ G~ P02
>v
'Y-• ^ -\7~'
,~y
;
;
j'~~---~ . ~ ~.1~ •,n.A+ .
3c- ~ r. ~ '
l~
F'
1. ~r
. t
r
_ . . .
, ;:,'.6,s
~ r ~ ~'k"'~.`•aw ~i.aiC~ ,J . ..•.rw4..ry ' • .
l.~.r~a:j . . . , ' , • r
v.. ,
r
- .41
..Ll__ r. . . . .
~ , ~2~ Sl/f~iY'OG/~?~!«~Gi• /~c~..Oj ~ ~
.59~~~l~ U 7 1-ya0v yl'I.1 ,~pd ~GytC~ ~ ~
d
~
y~g
~ ~ ~ , .~14~Y1~{~T' . ~
V A,
I , 1 *
!
~ A~
\ }
;i';~~;
~ ~ ;r
. i i:
- M~.i.
~ ~ ;
, ,I,, ,
~ ~
~
,~Y z
_ ~
~ ar - ' ~ ~
, , .^r4w..M: -'~lw.w.:~,:~,;,.~`i ~ • ~"u''C~ . 'r~
",-tM►:..:. . ':,,ir, ~',:.a~%rJi ' .
~ ~ ~
-
Ff ~ . ~
~1l1 t .r. 4
~ ~'~t~:~ ' ~,,..„r ; ' "
,~W . - ~ . . ~ .ti 'y ~ ~ ~'i .,6 ;
~~it ~air.~-r s..~.~,..~~,
~
; r~ i
~ r
~ a^ ~ n'x ~ M.{jf.,~ }
-}P.'..' 4 . ~ • ` r
~N~~. ~r l r L~ " °
,~i}'/}. T ,7y~'.
♦
f~`rA 1 ~ f~ r' e~ ~"q 1•~7~'a` A'
~ ~ . t ` _ . h ,>~~~e.„~o ~ i <aT, ~
r
' . ' ~ rt1~ a / f~l , .a rNjL
_ . , ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~a 4,% : vr b' ° • .r. Z.i~~~~ ~c ~ ~ . y~~.
~ l : h r '='i.hK.J
~ . { . ~ ~ sir ~ x ~..~~n h F 7 ~J ~t1~r .r .~,~~'~a
~ . . , ..~j , _
f r ^~b) ~ r +
• .c .
s ~Ai~ f ~ ~.,rl` 9..'~~'~u. ljr.~~~ ~~.~T• ~ ' `~+ri ° ~ .~titi,~i~ r~
' `~""~S ` ~ v ~ s ~ ~4~ ~k,J'~ y .
s _..,r~~> R.~+'r~ i.;~.?' ~ ,`',~r~!*f~,'ir,
i..~''«~, Y.~,~~, .r.i:.~•'1^f+,~J~~,. .
. . . . 4 ~ , ',f.: ' r,A
• _ '_.i:iM ;r
I - , ~ ( ~ , t~~~' r T L~~- II ~ `r ~[`~j/~{/~ ~
~ s- t~,'~ ; ~ ' . ~ , S'l ~ .
,
~ ~ ~
~ v ~
;
,
i
y~_ f! Y
x-
: ,
, ~ - • .
^ ~ • ',~".4 ~ . . - _
~ - .
>
, ~ •
, ;l
R.~ - ~ µy ~
.
-
, • -
s _ - _
. r
. - - , _
~
~
t * , .:r~r.-_..~ ~ • ~ .~,b1 _
~ .
. w.~
r - , - - . ~~..,i."'f~..~~~. a ~ i, }r'° c ~ . tt~
~ .y~. ~.,r;,~ ~..r- ~ •r1'~ yi~ j ~ 7„s, ♦ f~' fi.
~ ' " ACw ~ tM~~~~l~'~ • ~ t t 4 b`''{ ~ 1 ~ y 'I!. f
, _ .~i " . ~ ~ .r^ T'•- ~ . -y ` ~ S t '14h-.~ ~~ri 1 K
- r • •lr~a Y~} ~ •r, ~1~''~. ~~',,s~*~'t~°~ ~r ~-~~'-~7~'
f~~/
oBs ~
.-p.
~ ,
~ aff.: _
,1 ,5
r+ ~
- _ tir -
i R• ~
~
- kt~'~h.ti ~ {w~ ~r~ t i . •
. :~c . ~ I . . ' - 1~ . ' ~ ~ • 1 . ~ . ' - -
f-f-+K ~ " ~,.Mt~,.~ ;a,,. t"'-+..~►. ` v"~:'r~4
*
. ' ~ 1~..
~f
, r
~ '~r,~~~ 5' ~ y~' M ~,',ur ~ ` _ ~w' • _ ~ , ~ ,
•j r ~ a~ w~ ,Y ' ~ ~'.?u"'at~" . 1 T"F- :~`S • s~•"b'.,T ' . r.~-p: ~
~
~
~r^ 1 J y
Go S ~ ~ :
~ ~
~ ~
~ jr~,►M
,
N~ °
~
; ~r. ~ ~ ~ , . ~ e `1~' ~ ''~1r' * -
`
. . „
.
~
:
_
i
~ ~ a , ; , a~•, _ . w~►~~_ - ~ - ~ _ ~
,
~ .
~ Y i . . _ . . . . yr
„ y~ . ~I1 f ~ , ~ • , .
, : - ~ - . , iElk :,F° w ~ -
+ '_"'~w•~wx ~~,~~#y1~~^'.'1~~+ ~'#:~~~Ia4 ~M e ~ ' - , ~ . t~.t ~ r. ` Y~ ~f•~ r' . ~ ~ ~
~b~.~ y~ ~.+x _!lii~~~iSr,.L ~a:. ++l~.~~ ~ : 1 ~"~y ! ~ , Wwr j, t ~ . Y•~„yp_i ~ f ~
'
. ~ 1v _ ~~~W. ~ ~ ~ J~•~ ~
a
I ,Y v3e~ ' - ~ ~f' ~~i V ~..k . ~8'+` j .
Y :74y4 ~ i~w!Yr'►r~ y'~''~!' ~ ~ - '
L ' '~li►,~~'~ yhY~ii~'` , - ~
~ ~ k ~w~ • , ~ i+.
e _ r
N
. . _ : . .
~ . 7. . Y
`
~-s- • ;
E
- - -
Y.
. ~~'•'.ti° _ ' e . ' _ . _
~ ~ -
~
' p
- ~ ft aw
-.,~a. iy . r-!' - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ s . ' ~I
yl• Y~ry' ~~'Yr ~'l 1
r
i
- _ ws~ +P . h k 'a'• # . ~ _ r. r. i
~ ~ + Ify.~. .,,re yR ' ~ .r~.,+ i
•L..,r~i~~1. 5 . 'r~•! - -
I
n ~ ..Tf ~ , . ~ i~~ ~ _ P~' . ~ + 1 I
V'-
~ ~'y'•~ ~ .'~n . . - , . , . _ ~ ' 11 ~F
- tr' . • r'. w • ~ ~ , ~ . : , ' " : . . ~ " ~y s ~ I
y . ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 . : . ' l . 1 1. . , ' . ~ ~ . - ..1' ~.t~- i
.
~ . • ~ t ~ ~ - ~ , # 4 I
r
, . , .
u.y ` • . ,~h~.i~r",t ,-s ~
~t ~ ~ ~ a~' : I ~ • ,r i r'~ .,E _ ~ ~
~ ~
=e--- - -
. ~ ~ . ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ . - ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ar.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
i
, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANC COUI'1TY COURT MOUSC
MFMO ANDUM
To: Marshall Farnell, County Administrator
F r o m: Wally Hubbard, Planning Director
' Date: May 12, 1989
S u b j e c t: Safeco Insurance Company property at E. 14610 Sprague Ave. (tax parcel
23542-9084)--change in building use and eapansion.
The Safeco property consists of approximately 10 8 acres which were zoned Commercial
between 1958 and 1974 (reference zoning files ZE-168-58, 2E-9-67, and ZE-34-71) The
Board of County Commissioners in 1974 (Resolution #74-660) and a detailed State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rcview in 1975 set the parameters of any
development on the cntire Safeco ownership.
The overall master plan from 1974 and 1975 called for development of the Safeco site in
three phases totalmg 113,700 square feet with approximately 400 parking spaces
Extensive landscaping, special building setbacks, sensitivity to lighting plans, and road
dedications/improvements were all required for development of the site
Currently, it appears that Safeco has developed only two of the three phases on only
about 7 6 acres of their total 10.8 acre ownership Generally, the west 32 acres is
undeveloped The developed portion of the property has a building with approximately
100,000 square feet of floor area and about 200 parkmg spaces. The site is extensively
landscaped and Board imposed cond'mons appear to have been saUsfied to date The
improved 7 6 acre site appears to be at maximum development vnth buildmg footpnnt,
and required landscaping, parking, and setbacks consuming the site Any additional
building expansion would need to move onto the currently undeveloped west 3 2 acres
In 1979 the Zomng Administrator made some administrauve commitments to Safeco to
allow a total cumulative buildmg floor area (for all three phases) of up to
approximately 125,000 square feet Given that and the fact that 100,000 square feet has
already been constructed, an additional 25,000 square feet of floor space could be added
with the 3 2 acre site Also, because of the nature of Safeco's operation and work force
characteristics, there was some administrative flexibility allowed in parking ratio
standards with the phase two expansion in 1979
Memo to Marshall Faraeii page 2 May12, 1989
If a Bank's Credit Card Division wished to locate on Safeco's entire site we would review
the situation with some sensitivity to past actions, commitments, and developments We
have assumed that the new operation would operate somewbat within the parameters
that Safeco has which allowed us flexibility in regards to some standards Those
characteristics included a localized work force, few customer tnps, and continuance of
the landscaped areas
Given the above, the remodeling of office space and cbange in occupancy of the
bwlding sbould not be of great concern According to Jim ARanson, Building and
Safety Department Director, those actions would require a building permit and review
of plans through his office There would be ao need for an environmental review
under SEPA. The Planning Department would review for consistency with current
standards with an eye to past acaons
We would expect a westerly building expansioa, whether in conjunction with the
existing buildmg ownership or by another u►terest, to be consistent with the exisung
Safeco improvements and master plan This would include sensitivity to landscaping,
building setbacks, and required parking. '1'his scenano would also require a building
permit review based upon some specific architectural drawings snd specifications
This review would involve all agencies in Spokane County with buildmg permit sign
off responsibilities, Buildmg and Safety, Planning, Engineenng, [Jtilities, Heaith
District, and, possibly, Air Pollution Control Provided that the total floor area for the
entire complex doesn't exceed 125,000 square feet, there should be no SEPA
environmental review required since it was covered in the 1975 review
If the prospective company's plans don't fall into the above two scenanos, then there
is the option to return to a public heanng with the Heanng Examiner Committee to
review a changed site plan or a new rezone proposal. 'I'his altemative would, thoug6,
require a new environmental review under the SEPA regulations I don't foresee any
problems at the review heanng given the commercial nature of this Sprague Avenue
area and availability of public uulities This, of course, is assuming that those new
plans are somewhat aesthetically consistent with exisung improvements at Safeco
If you need additional informaUon or help, please give Jim 1Vianson or myself a call
WDH,PGF
cc Jim ARanson, Director Building and Safety
file ZE-34-71 ✓
file ZE-9-67
i
SA Fe-CO
s-r~E>
DD s •
. ~ ,oao
~
C ~ • -~J C,~+~-- t~-~
. .3 ~
~ a Q
_ Q~ ~
. Acves
~
. Q ~exp
-
. . ~l
~ - - .
~
; _ _ _ . ~
. • , , .
- ~ .
~ ~ _
~
...i:..'/1 i'!~ a ~~~l.~. n ~ . I . i' i ,I.., ' _ I I
? . , . . 6 _ ' .k. 1 ~ . ~ . ~ I ~ 1- . i.:.~ ...r ..J r & ~ . . t .
~ ,ti::~f 3 ~ L_ ~ W 1"1 ~ ~ .f. GG~ ~ C ~ r.:~. .
L_~th•~L~ T I~~'~ TCi~'fi~l._ C~ F T. Fe`~ ~.~~FEx7 GE1~tT . Tr'1`A' N~' ~..1. €~E~: L~ L~~~~'~ . TA X~'X ~~:~v_~ _
~ ~ ~ c~i c~~ ~ ~ ~~:rt~ ~~k~~~ ^ c-~ ~r~ R c~~ t_} ~ t~~ ~3 ~ ti ~ ~ e ~~y f~~ a ~ ~f. ~.'~'~f~~~~ , f r 1 ~ r~~
' 19 9 tp3 c i q. t.k ~ b t~~ ~ ~:J ~~t 4 r~~ , c~, t~~ ~ a~~ , i~a . ~_a , 4^D ~ 3 : . .
T i ' ' ~ F'" ~ E Pti ~ r-: : , , ~ , r-~ r•+ ~ { 1.._ r..`' C'" ~ i P ! F- r- j~+, r p F~. 3~ r~,ti a, fW. y~ ~ rl 7.~~ j ~ r..; .
~
~ . 7 ~
. _ . •y _ . . ~ _ _ ' ' _ . . . _
~ ~ . . . . _ . .
I '
~ 'tl=-iE`
~ tM p-~ ~ti j i, ~1 p ti I t!_` r~ i f~, i r;~ o--~ ,,r ~ ~
, ;
~ ~ ~
~
G.. . . ~ y ~ . . , . . - . _ _ _ , . . .
- - - - - - - -
. - . , ~ ,
. . . < ;r-., . . ~ . [ -~e - . J. , ..:il, ri _ ' ~ . . ~ . ~ .
. ~ . . ~iF"~F1~t7~~~ U~+~ ~ ~"I~"'1;;~'~E~~? T~:IT~~r... ~~i~L} ~ 1`~F"~~ . f C1T' I
~:,E=?~:~ ~t;t"-~E~ ~,~'~.}._CJE A~;~i~~ ~,l~l..lJ~ AC~"~'~ '~f~~....~1'~ Vt~t_l~~ '~A~~_f: ~ _
~1. ~e r ~ 'C. 1. ~t ~ 4~a . ~;x c~~ ~ ~ r ;l ~ '1 '~'9 r ~ 4 ~ ~ c~~ c~~ ~e ~ c"x sq~ t~~ ~ ~ 1, ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~i "9c-~ c:~ ~ ~°1 ~ 1,~ 9~`~r1cy~ ~:~s`~c.:~ ~ bs~~:~ ~ . , ~
i i ~ ~~c~~~f ~ c'~tu3 ~ :L ~ r'~:~c:r ~.`~~:~~c~a~a ~~,c~~~;; :
-_.._~:r`_~. -x:~~ 'L~.3~~' I"'I/L. ~IF
_ F ,
. r-- x
, . . ~ .
l -i .1 ~ l.i~ ~ .f ~ t ~ r I'.. t t P i ~ I- - .-w ~ ~
r . , ' _
, .
. ,
, , ~ , ; , , . . , . , , :
. ,
,
_ . _ , - i - ~ - - •
, :
-
_ • ~ . ~ r, _ ~
_ , r-~,i., , , , . . _
, _ , .
. . , t , ~ , . ,
;..s , ,
. . ; . . _ -
,
. : ~ ~ ~ r
c _ ~
, ,
~ . .._Y i ~ ~ ~-4 .~.i i-~-. ~~..1"_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 1.... ~ S ..r _ . . . . . , . .
, u , }F:c.-~6 . a- i.~
, f.. l_.. .t { ~ ~ ,
, ~ {~1 f~~ d"} 1 (~y F~1 ~ ' , . .
: 1. 41~1f~.. 1~L_i~ ? V~AL ~Ll~ ~ ~
; ~,t~y:~~~;3~`s ~~`t;_~t~;~v~
? (~l F' 1~E ~ r'~ ~f Cl Q fw' ~ ~ I3 ~ l'► F' F' ~`s ~ ~ `
„ ~
- r -
~ ~ ~ ; ~ • "1, L, ~ t' *
_ 23 ~ r• t., w. ~ f F. -1?~cS~ ix~
, r• 1i`
~
2~, -4' r
' v
• ~ ~ - 's~;~1• ~ 'i, ti . .
- ~ , • _t i , ,l r . ~ t . I,
• • S ~...p 'r'. ' ; ~ . . a ,i.
f ~ • r • ~ . ~;hrj 1 - . ~ .
ICCHJ ~
* ~ + ' i~r .4 ' ~ 1~ l
V ~ ~ . )
4
20;0 r ~ ,Fa- Nt4 1S N
, ~
SSESISOR
~ , ~•1• ~ . ~ . 1►+
, . ~ ER.IAY ONE
nv
' . ,
- -
! L ~ ~ • ~
i _ • ,
91•' ~
/0
.r ~
~ . ti • .
~ ~ V . ' "e.... p . ~ t
I . I .
• -
E L FF Ga
~ b
• ~ 1 ~ ~
. ~ . !.1
1 ~
~ GQ
V s .
1~67
, 4 ♦ . , , ~ + . / ~ \
' ~ ~ ~ . / • . ~ ~
• ~
8.65 MI.
. , { . ~
, (0 I
.q
1 .
~ ~ .
- (v 81,~
~ss ~p~ ~
/ C
I - ~V 7 i
0
B-3 , ~ . -71C
I I 4 ~
,
1 f
1*68 - `
-58
n68
r 62-
" So j.4 4S'B.7
~
t s .t /7 5 .99 ' I
~l l. ~ f1 S f. S
2 13 - I , "
o 88 ~
' A 2 ~ i
~.opevatiny ~4 ~ •
.s z ~
, , , ~ 9 ,
~ _
~ .
D
, I 4
. 5 0 15
• /30.0 ' ~ ~
. 5 ,
I9v~. AS
i z o • ~ /29,~ ~ (1^ ~
0 . 5 ~ 6
n ~ V ' ll "r -63
~ ~so ~S~ i.te. Yr ~ •
4 N (E~ ~
8 G z o b
z 9~ .
l0 8 ~ , 4
, 15o A,o
~ ~ •4 ~ .
19 20 al aa ~ 03
l 3 13
. ~ ,
2 m t ,t 90
. . , . ~ . .
' 16 /T ' /B } i 9 • 20
N 9 3~ l 2 x ,
, .
4 q4 / sa p f4 i ~
5a
,~e _ I . l_ -
~
~
0
Ora~
t~~~` ~ aet
cF e JaC
{ ~ c
a
O
10 0 70
ah ~ us
ie• l~ C 8h
O ~
r
EE 1~ ~.'~m _ 4 ~
~
1U
~
Po .
I Z e1 _ so,, ~ 1~ ~
App
~ •
J c
~
~ ~ R~►~~s
S 1
1 ~
a q , ~s
O P
5uo
N
~
400140A,
R +
Q ? ~
MA
y ~ o y~R~
~ ~ cE
~I A
U A p p.
,
ke~a
s
~ v
Af*P.~sg
r••
o '
, ~ ~ 1 • ~
.
30
- . 1s0 : cc r
~ I
ICZA
. ~
. _ ~
lr,
~
~;J . _ - 1 3-,2
' ~ ' ' 1 ~ . ~ ~ Z"'~ _
.
~ •
~ r L°. ° I , . ~ ~ ~
~ w ~ o~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~
` .
. . ~ ~ .
cg I ~
JV ,
O&°
°
~ ~ . 0~` ~ ~ ~
o ~ cl
~ y B
• .I~Y . ` • e
+ J Y4 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~
( (w 1~ ~ r~ ~ r e~~ ~ ~ 1a►
ile No. ZE-34-71
I
c SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A I NTRODUCTION
This, matter having come before the Examiner Committee on February 7, 1980,
and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairman, Paul
Sceva, Jr and Ted McCoury
B PROPOSAL -
The sponsor, SAFECO, is requesting approval of a change of conditions,
Z E-34-71, to omit the cond ition for a fence between Second Avenue and the
Milwaukee Railroad tracks
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1 That the existing land use in the area is commercial, church, school, rail-
road, and undeveloped
2. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Commercial.
3 That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complted with
4. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have,been fulfilled
5 That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area
6 That the owners of adjacent lands expr, essed neither approval nor dis-
approval of the proposed use
7 The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare
8 The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee
a) That the original fence requirement is not necessary in the develop-
ment of the property for the existing business
D CONDITIONS OR CONTING'EfVCIES APPL.IED TO THIS APPROVAL
,
REQUEST CHANGE OF CONDITIONS. Omit condition (5) that requires a fence
be constructed between Second Avenue on the north and Mi Iwau kee RaiI road
tracks on the south
a) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a
review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi-
cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration
of non-significance
1
hle No ZE-34-71
G
_ E ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of SAFECO Corporation for a change of conditions as described in the
application should be approved
Motion by McCoury Seconded by Sceva, Jr.
Vote• Unanimous
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
- Chairman
.
ATT EST
FRED L DAYHARSH
Planning Director
By
~ -2_g-gej
2
{ ~
' _ . . , . ' • f~~7 i~. ~ ~ I ~ TN 1}7RIIY~7 ~ ~ • . , ~ + r . . ~ . ' ~ . . ~ . , , , . . ' i h ~ : ~ ; , , • . . , . ' . . ' ~ . • ' . . . • ~ . `i` ~ e • , . . . . . . .
I. . . . ,~~3~ . , ` , • ~.r . t ; . . . . • . . . , . , ~ , w . ~ ' ~ - - , . • . ~ ~ . . . ~ c . ~ . } , r r t ~r . ' ' ' y , . . ~ ~'(R y~~ J'~F ` . . w I 1~}~ ~~r y .Fi!r . .Y~ 4 1 i . , a
. ' . . . . + `1~ • ~f 'f . ~ ^ F`ti~*Y4%f~ A ) ~ .~.,;r ~ ~.1~ . S ~SS ~t ! i~~ 4 ''Z. ~~g F :i~ y ' . ~ ~ . , , r~ y ~ . ° ..y r 1 , . . y ~4 . rt4.~. ~..t. k ? :1 ~ y ~.r~ ~ . i • . ~ a {''S ' ~ ~ ~ t ~ ; ~ ~9~'~fa t'1~,iL , ;y y fi k a~ i , ~ < l~;~. ~~,''r~`:+~'i~, ~",~~"~.~"~f~~IJC'~ ` • ' ~ A • 'F • y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ttC ~ ~ . ~ . . .
„ . , , „ , , , . . ~ ~ . r. . 1 • . v '~a^ , . ~ . ~ ' ~ ~~s~ . . , r . , n . . . ~.~~r a . i _ ~ ~ t ~ t~i=~. . . 7 : . * . , ~ . .1 ~ . ~ ~ , ~ r. ~ , f. r r } ~.tt t ~1 1 ~ V ~ A' q ~t t.~ N + i. , _.:x • • ~
'f' ~ ~ ~ - . . ~ ' ~ ~ " . . . . . ~t~`~t c r fr~ ~ r 1~ti~. • ~ i~~i'~.. ~:'r~4i e. t.~ ~ ~ h 1-a~ ,,sy~, ~ ~ . ~ . . , 'S, . . i . r i . ~r . ~ . . k ,s ~ r~ i .r n;: ,T ~~."A. ..,~ta~i„~'i .i r~~~~, t ~~~'wy'i 4kr . ~ - . ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ .1~' tti , ` , . ~ , . ~~.~.i:Y'!..,, ~tn„ ~~a v~ ~ . 4i 1 .~r ~rt. 'l~"~s~ ' .•r ~a.,t..`~ r'i. d X~y7,~.. . p~ a . . . . ' r. • ~i'. . . ~`a ~ ..71. ~ 4K'• Y. , •4: ~t .,,p ~ 1,~.~~ '!'W ~ . . ~ • - -r~ , . , . . . . ~ f . , ,r~r .r'.i:i.?~'-v :'t.:~. 9 sd' v:~+.;?A' s4~ 'a~ u... '~.,'l~
~ , , 1 ' : ~ :t ~ . ~«r~, ~k + s fi r, ~ ~ } . . y ~'.y ~ r~.p y ~ , , f• s•~ r` i . ~y~-. ~ ~1,, u~;4; ,a.~ir+~ ~ + , ~s~ ~ . , . , . , s'i ir. . . I , .,'i4~ ~ -~41 ~ ':.~5 .~I.*~ 3 ~~1!'-~`•~ •
I . 4 • . . 1:~~~ . , -Y ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ . . • ~ ~ ~~~et~~.W ~~W~4~ ~ !~'s > ~w~ . . „ ~ , _ `1 t ' ~ t, ~ ` ~ . ~ ! ~ ' I . 5 • ' _ i . t~+ a . ~i~ r ~1.Jrn w~ „~'!.w Y, K..' y ~ ~,p~. X ~~1~ . ~~~y.. - - • " '
. . , ~~,h ~ I . . ~ V~1~. Y .~,v ~ ! 4,,,'~-, 5 ~~,jl, b~s~ M 1 , . e. " • 'i ~ ~ . ' . . . ..~t-:~~¢ .I~t t ~:S"~ ~ 1'~ T h ~ j : ' . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . - ~ . . i._`. . . a ~.~f. .s,t,t". ~ ~ ~ ~ y~'~ . ~ . • j1~Y P ~ ~S ry.~ ~ L. k ~ ry~' . .
. . r~ . ' ' 'd' . . . • .k.~ ~ r~. ~ , . ~ , ' ~~#S .~1 ~1., ~;~q7~ ,t •,"9~~Ti~'. A~,~ h ~~t~ ~~y~~y~` t i~rt~~~:. Cs~ ~<q.~. ~ ~ . ~ ' ~ . ~ y ' f; ~ , ~ ~ . . ~ ,l;~ay:f" y1' rr.. .a~` X ti-.,~?_'} 1 tF, ~ °vP. y- .rltr-, r 1 ~ ~L~ ` . n 7, . . a . ~ :7, ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ . ' ~ - : ~ , ~ - S~-y r lr~ ~ . r.^^ ~9 ,"3'~ Y~ .x~. , . . ~t. ~ _ ~ { ..k :~.'~'n.P~ 'i'~a?U ~.s ~1. - ti :;Y ;b, r~~~ . . i". s •~~4 ,
' l . , . . , ' " ~ ~ y~ ~ ~lt a ~i. ~ ~.C .49 ..1R Y. ~.ry 4 j l' f .I ~ r . ' 'ir,: • -Y . . ~ ~ , ~ ~ i • ~Y ~ l fi i ~ t{~•i~F~*1 . . . . ~ .l Y. t . ' ~ . . ~ ~~'ti'~ ~ ~tY Y ~.M<7_ ''t~` h~ :.~f 1 ~ ~0,~, J,S~.~ '"~,.a ~/i_ cd3~ . • ~ ' ~ , . ~ . ~ - at ~ ~s Y: ~ zr ~1 '`~T ~A • , . + ` _ a ..;r
' ~ ~ r ` ,~t.. ,r. ~ . , , . . g ''A~• ~ . , ~ • . I - ` ~ ~ J, 1 ~ .~"'.w C ~ } .;~i~v ~~,,..-t . ~ i .4. ~ , ' _ . I. .L ~_."4 ~ yx wY S . • , •~i,.. . { , . ~ r ~ t,~y!~t ~ur.~~ .a}h ~.k.&F°'. w+a`i2,`~~!r ir, i . , . ~ i~~ ~ `?t ~ , o.. . . ''t~ ' ' - -~.~c' 'r• . ~.l..r',~,~ ~ ~~y~Y ~f :,a~',~~4"i..'K• ~4°.t~. 1.:~4°~r-~t:-~,~,iXF ~ ~:ik~ +43~'.t.
M ~ r . • v , , . ~ »i' ~ ~ ~~s y ,a ' ~ ~ r ..~k hY . s~. . d ~,i. .w d . y .'tY3.. - . . ' . 1 ~ • .i . ' ~ . . { , . y i:~ 7+.~ v~_i~ ~:t~- f J,h` `r11p~ ~N.~~` .tii y-1~~ . . , . _ ~ . .n' ~ ~ s + . . ~ ( . L~,,.~r. F ~'x t ~r ~ 3c ~g~a,-1~ ~ 7A 7~~~ ~i i , 4-rt '4 t ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ . - . . . . ~r ~ . e,i~j~' .r~ ~ T . ,~r
, ' . . ~ .J!' , A, . « y ~ i... .i 4 3f~:~ '1~s y . ~y ~ .,r~.~~,f~ 'x ' . 1 . , . ~ . . . . ~ _ ~ .e ~ r ~ ~4'~ ~,r~C "i ' ~S. 1' . ~i' t -M \ q ~ . • ~ ' ~.yH~'S~9&~~. g~~,I~ ,s. dT~~;~. f 4~,~j' cY ';ci~i '7 $y
~~4 . ~ . - . • ~ . . t ~ . . A ~ I • ' •wi~~ .~e~. .~i" . f~^ r"~~~p 4~t~` ys ~ 1 ) 4~Yr ~ 'S~, ~..~r.,'f . t . . - • . , r: _ ,G~~ ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ .:a ~,'~iE. ~ ~~}!rs ! ~ ~ 6 ?r . r~~ , ~ . • . . . . T . 4.". ~tiR , . ' . . 't ~ ~ . ~ . ' ' y . r.''- i ~ 9 aw ~ ~ , . • , . ~~11~~ ~y . ~ . . . " . L~f.a~crj'~` , p~~.~~"» t~ ~ " ` ~ ~ ' ' , . , „ ~ ' ~ , •r: ; T.,.,~ , d,~ • ' . . • . ~ ~T~~..y~~ ~v f'!~f ~ k;.- - J ~ . .
~j~ '~ry ~ ) . . ~r a .r ~d . M~ „ .•r~• . . . ~ . ~ . ~ ' ' ~ . . ~ 4, . ~..e: ~j~J „!'~.~~.,.1 . ~ ~ } ^~d r 't ~ . . e ~i r ~ , ` . ~ . r. , ~ ; , . i ~li ~ . , ~j~ f { ~ ~Llsi~1~~R 1#~~1 Ik Y .:k.. '1" y ~ 4~"•~,. . .i,d~' I • , - `w ~ ~i~....~s,.. ~ ~f ~i• . a . :.l _ _ . ~ , . ~ ! . . ~ . _ . , ,i ~r`'* ~~4 . - . - . , , .a;~ _ . _ ' a , ~ . . , d • ~C' . . . . . . . . ~ . _ . ~ •~a~. . . . . - . . . . .1 . . 1 . .a . . _ . .r \ .Yw ~r I . J k~~, , ~ },`tr . • ' • . ' qrII • ~ ~ I
• , ~ pl~.~ d~ ,~TtC~'4t C. . S ' ~ . , ' , ~ s ~ a ;t~ p xr , ~ . 1 8~ . 1~'. i '1'311~ a , ~ - , ~ _ , . ~ ~ . 3.:x.r,~. •ti'a, N ~1 . ~ . • • , . • . , . I ~ . . . t~ ~~.k. 4 ~ '~i' .
~ r . ~ ~ ~ , . . • , . • ~ • . , . - ~ - ' f . • . . . . , • • . . . ~ ° , ' ` . I ~ . , ~ . . . . . • . , . ~ .
' , - ~ 'i; ~ I . _ ~ • . , . . , , . . , . . , , . ~ ~ ~ I . - , ~ , • ' , , . , ' , ; ' . ~ , ~ . , ~ . ~ ~ . " • . . . , ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ • ' . +r. ~
' , I ~ . , . . , . ' 1 ~ ; . • , .
, r~. I I , • , i I , ' , , , ~ I • ' . ' . . 3.
, . ~ ~ ~ , . ' ' ' ' ' ' , ' ~ ' ' . ■ . . ~ . , ' , . . ~ • F.
' ' . • , . ' . ' • ^ ' , , ' , . ' . y . . . ~ ' . . . . .
i ~ ~ ~ . . . . „ , , . . , . i PF~AB$ il PIAAKINL~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ ~
• , ~ , ~ I ~
„ I • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ _~_______________w__--------_-----_----______________~ . ~
I i ~ ~ , ' I ~ PFWt~E I PAAKINC~ . ~ . . ~ 3 Y ' - . ^ • ~ '
I ; • I r • i ~
' • ~ ~ I ' . , ~ I I , . I I ' I ~ I •
i I ; ALL ~XTEFif[]Fi L![31iY'INp TQ 9E LOW pFiOFIL.E l . ' , r . P`° s ~ , • . " ~ : . . . , ~ ~ ~ AND NOlV - OLARE WtTN BTANGAFiL7~ NQT ~XC"EmIfIK~ , ~ l ~ - 1 •
1~ . • . ~ i ~ ~ . ~ ' 'IE~ W HEI~HT ~ ~ i i . - i ! ~ - • ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ " ' ' ' • .
, ~ ' ~ 1 • ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ • . ~ k .
. I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ PARKIfVIC3 AREAS TO BE 8~1ih~ F#i[7M i ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ • .
' ~ I~LIG VI~W WITH PLAMiNC38 ~ ~ . . ~ t .
, i ~ ! „ ~ ~ a . ~ i . s . . -
{ t ~ , ~ , , ~ ~ . ~ , , s ~ a • . B
, ~ . . ~ , ~ . . .
~ ~ - . . , a i ~ , . " L - - . ~ T_ , I 1 'Q:
. r . . - ~ , , ~ ' . . . . . . . . h ~
~ ~ _ , ~ } . . ~ . . ~ , ~ ~ • ~ I _ r _ ' I
r___~------- Rfi~~ 1 F~ARKIN[i " ,
~ ~ ~i7.5 E~7ALL.9 " ~ . . ,
~ ' • • ' ' PHABE q PApK Il11~3 " . i . ~ • , ~ ~89 BTALLB (CLIMLFLATIV~] , . ~ , ,
' pHASE Ifl PARlCI(V~ ° . . 1
; GFi~D LOCATIQN OF 4O8 BTi4LLS (CUMiULATlVEI . i 9EW~~L3E T~A1'fVlEfUT PLAfvT : ~ AND Oq11111~F1E1~ , - - ,
~ . _ - - - . , , . . . . . . r/
PC~PERTY LlNE . ~ • ~ _ - ' 8~0' , - . , ~ ~ ~ ~l
' • , ~ . - . . ~ . ~r . • ~ l; , . , , . . . . _ ` - ' . • , _ _ _ _ _ • • : . . • • '
- ~ °~'~~1~KER MC~GQUGH FdL ~ , x T , LY ' ARCHITECTS - EN~INEER~ , FOLTZ, LYERLA,
- coun~rY Ao~ ~ ~ ~ 12~ `~VALL STRE~T, P. C~. BC - ENGiNEERS :7, P. 0. BOX 14" 2
~ - - - - - - - ~ wa~~~r~r~ a
. ~ a
e~anr~ ~irue a.R. raac.~a , ; . , , , . . ~ , , , _ _ _ ~ , , . , , , , , , ~ _ _ - - - - ~ ' s
I
I
•V 1, - + 2•- t i -j~
'f7k qC ra,S` --",f 6'= #r~
v,e a
KE Fi D I
~~4
~
~
"I K t3
- e~~
~C~ ~XO
~ N
~
~
221
~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ • ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 12 Z*l "41
~
gAi
~ 3 t
~ ~ s ✓1Ap ~ x AO.n if
-
~
~
<
P
~r
r~
ivt ~ ,1
,,~r~',,r /,r6. 2
+Fs ~
. - _ . . ;1 cj~
's
~ ~ ~ ~ 7,~ ~ ,►Co
~ 00~ ~
~..,.~;-j ~ . - , - ~6~a~ ~ .
~
~RJ' ~~'..ry - - . ~ ~ 1 ~ •
VERSIDL f~YE 4
_ ' ~ ; ~r ~ ~~yij i .;J~ . i• ~
_ _ ~ y - . - . _ i i. ~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ A l' ~ ~ f~
,
( I
,
I
,
~ .
6
- ; Y -
. .
- ~+~"~I'/1~ ~ z .~,~,r~ , ~ ~~...,...~.i_._.~ - -
_ ~ .
xv IN
- - - - ~ ~rt~ • #+~w~ ~_~r ii~ ~ _ ~t V ~ _ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~f ~ _ y _ _ -
~ ~ r. ~ _ _
r. t„!T~'r'~"'~ r' , ~M , • 1 ~~P~
' ^ ` _ ~ • , ~„•~~IY k ~ ~ f~~
~ic
o`
r , ~ . ~,.,~rr• - ' . j ; ~ ~ ~ c ~
, . ~ ,f G -
_ i~?f,' . . '-•;'7 'a' ,.t`. j'~ ' ~ ~
: r~ , . • , y ' h ~LI S~ L
~ . ' ~ ,fi T . ~ _ • ~ , .
prc~'i~~ . ~ I + v ~ r~, _~►c,+t?C~"._""" ~ `w~
~ ; , ' ~ . ~ ~ , 1
. ~ I • ~rl~M. ~ ` ~ . , ~ ~~.0 .
~ - _ - ~y~.p .w~ I` I- a , -
P1~-
. 'l
. 1 t r
. ~ !
.
. . . , . C .
, , ' . r1~ • _ . . ~ .
r
Y1 ,
~ .
4~ .
~ ~ ~ . _ , - - - . _ ~ls~ -f-~ , _ . . _ _.rc-A~ I ♦
. . . ~ ty . ♦-li:•~ - ~.~~.~t--_
f y •
~r
l ~ I
469
~ _ _ • f .
~
~ -
5POKANE VALLE(I rIPAE DEPARTIAENT
&"4 ,a~ X. /
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 o TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
January 28, 1980
Marcia Raines
Zoning Administrator
N721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Ms. Raines,
The following zone reclassifications have been reviewed
for fire protection:
t~ ZE-34-71 SAFECO
ZE-199-77 AMERICAN WEST
The above need mains and hydrants to be installed in
their areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment
around the building shall be approved prior to building
permit is uance.
~
r .
6 ✓ ti • \
Lt. of Inspectors ~
✓ ` ~
, Y
~
,
~
~
F TIF ,
.f . _ , .
V E
E C E I
J A^~ r) 0
SPOKANE COUNiY
PLANNING DEPARTMEN,
PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES ,
SPOKANE COUNTY XEALTH DrSTRICT
Inter-Office Comawnlcation
Date 2$. 14$O
TO: _ZgDin"dmi i tort Sookane Countv PlanninR Department
FROMs Lu¢ene . 8ther, R.S.
SUBJECT: Review of Zoninp Iteme Scheduled Februarv 7, 1980 ,
1. We have eommeate as followe on eubjece mattere.
v,"2. ZId 2-57 (Northwaod Propertiee, Inc. )
ae Thie pvoject lies over the Spokane Aquifer and in the North Suburban
Spokane Sanitsry Sewer Plan Area and in Whitworth Water Dietricto
Surface axea available for sewage and eurface vater dieposal, may
result in 8 lese than projected land use deneity.
b. Recommended coaditione:
(1) Buildirg plumbing and general sewage plan ehall facilitate
connection to an area-wide eewerage syetem,
(2) A detailed combined on-aite eewage system and surface water
dieposal plan for the entire project ehall be approved by
the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District
prior to the ieeuance of any building permft.
(3) The owner, hie heire, aesigne and aucceeeors ehall agree to
participate in and not proteat aseeeemente for sewer local
improvement dietricte and theiz facilities fonaed to seYVe
the area including thie project.
✓3. ZW-172-79 (C b T Inveetments)
8. Thie project liee in Critical Water Service Area (CWSSA) ADo. 4. Sub-
ject to eite specific review ae the time of application for a sewaRe
disposal permit, the use of on-site eysteme is acceptable.
b. Recommended conditione:
(1) The entire project shall be served by a single water eystem
establiehed ae coordinated by the Direceor of Utilitiee of
Spokane County and the Regional Engineer (Spokane) of the
Department of Social and"Health Servicea.
(2) The uee of individual on-eite eewage syateme ie euthorized
eubject to obtaining appropriate permite.
✓4. ZW-239-79 (Evergreen Weet)
a. Thie project liee in CWSSA No. 4 and adjacent to ehe Airway Heighte
0
~ a$teg systeme Public eewer le not available; soile mre auitable for
the ttse of on-site sewage diapoeal eysteme.
SCND-AD1~118
[
e ~
~ I 1
j• Review of Zoning Itema Scheduled February 7, 1980
Page 2 - PRemo
Januaty 28, 1980
~
~
b. Recoammended conditione:
(Y) The projece shall be provided water aervice by Airvay'Heighte.
(2) On-site sewage diepoeal systeme may be suthorized.
~ Se ZE-34-71 (Safeco)
a. Thi• project liee 6►l.thin CTaIISSA #3 and the servfce area of Vera Water and
PototteT Company. Public sewer is not available; •oile are euitable for
the use of on-site 8ewage diBpoeal eyeteme. It ia located over the
SpokaAe Aquif eg.
b. Recommendations:
J Y
(1) A detailed combii►ed on-site sewage system aad aurface water
diepoeal plan for the entire project ehall be approved by
the County Engiaeer and the Spolcane County Health Dietrice
prior to the iseuance of any building permit.
(2) The uee of individual on-eite eewage ayetems is authorized
subject to obtaining appropriate permits.
6. ZE-199-77 (American Weae)
a. Thie project lies over the Spokane Aquifer in CWSSA #3 within the water
eervice asea of Modern Electric Company. Soile are generally ecceptable
for use of on-afte sewage diBposal.
b. Recommendations:
(1) A detailed combined on-site eewage eyetem and eurface water
disposal plan for the entire project ehall be approved by
the County Engineer and the Spokane County Bealth Dietrict
prior to the iesuance of sny building permit.
(2) The use of individual on-eite eevage eqateme is auehorized
eubject to obtaining appropriate permite.
7. ZE-199-79 (LaCroix)
Same commente and recommendatione apply ae for ZE-34-71 (Safeco), paragraph 5
aboveo
,/8. ZE-260-79 (U-Haul)
Same comment and recommendatijons apply as for ZE-34-71 (Safeco), paragraph 5
above.
✓9. ZE-270-79 (Agri-Plan Asaociatee)
~
Same comrneAt and recommendatione apply ae for ZE-199-77 (American West), para-
graph 6 above.
.
Review of Zouing Iteme Scheduled February 7, 1980
Page 2-Meaao
JanuaYy 28, 1980
~
l0o ZN-4-80 (Naccarato)
Same commeat and recommendations ae apply for ZN-2-57, paragraph 2 above.
11. ZW-211-79 (G.M.H. and Asaociates, Inc.)
a. Thie project liea in CWSSA #4; water service must be coordinated
through Spokane Countq Director of Utilitiee snd Itegional Engineer
(Spokane) of the Department of Social and Health Servicee (DSHS)•
Soile in the area may present difficultiea for use of on-site sewage
dieposal; public sewer ie not now available.
b. Recommendatione:
(1) Coordinate water eupply with Spokane Countq Director of
Utilities and DSHS.
(2) The use of on-eite aewage disposal is authorized subject
to obtaining appropriate permita.
dc
~
,
~
~
STAFF REPORT
DATE FEBRUARY 71 1980
TO. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM• PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER. ZE-34-71
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT Safeco Corporation
EXISTING ZOPIING. Commercial
REQUEST CHANGE OF CONDITIONS Omit condition (5) that requires a
fence be constructed between Second Avenue on the north and Milwaukee
Railroad tracks on the south
PROJECT LOCATION Generally located at the southwest corner of
Sprague Avenue and Adams Road
II SITE PLAN INFORMATION
LAND USE Site Undeveloped
North Safeco
East Warehouse Foods
West Undeveloped,
South Milwaukee Railroad, business office,
playground, church, school
ZON I NG North Commercial, established, 1978
East Commercial, established, 1973
West Commercial, established, 1958/1967
South Agricultural Suburban, established, 1963
III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On April 30, 1971 the Planning Commission approved a ione change for a
shopping center at the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and Adams
Road On September 19, 1974 the County Board of Commissioners finalized
the zone change, but for an office building not a shopping center.
Fencing of the property north of the Milwaukee Railroad and south of
Second Avenue was a condition of the original zone request for the
shopping center
The Safeco Corporation is now planning an expansion of their present
building Safeco feels the fence was to serve as a barrier between a
shopping center and the school, not an office building
1
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dote anuarv 23 , 1982_
Inter-office Connmunication
To Zoni ng Admi ni e t ra to r
from Countv EnAineer
Sub ject 2E 34 -71
l, No requirements at this time.
Form 327-L R
~
~ . ~
DATE HOUR
To
WHILE Y U WERE OUT
,
oF
PHONE ~ CJ
AREA ODE PH0T3E NVMBER
TELEPHONED ~ RETURNED CALL ~ LEFT PACKAGE
PLEASE CALL ~ WAS IN PLEASE SEE ME '
WILL CALL AGAIN WILL RETURM IMPORTANT
AAA& R
~r
,
~
4LL - tte9,& jbr .cln
SI6NED
~
The AICO-UTILITY Line Form No. 55-058
- ~vE D L9100000. OfFICE OF TbE
ut~ 61979
' /SPOKAIVE COUNTY PLANNING N
DEPAQT111~1E
1 " C0~NTY COMMISSIONERS
Date December 6 01q 79
To Board of County Commissioners
From h1arcia M. Raines
Subject A Request to Delete Condition #5 from Board of County Commissioners' ReSOlution
No. 74-660: File 7F-34-71.
, File ZE-34-71, a request for zone reclassification from Agricultural to Commercial
for purposes of constructing a shopping center, was reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission on April 30, 1971. Approximately 3 1/2 years later, the zone
reclassification was reviewed and finalized by the Board of County Commissionel-s.
At the time of fi nal i zation of the zcr,n, ev;"--
i 1 l~ t i, i'.{ L, ~J C,i i u l.' i lV l.i 7!., i
f'
Safeco Insurance Company office building was constructed on the southwest corner
of Sprague and Adams.
Fencing was a part of the original staff recommendation to the Planning Commission
regarding the shopping center proposal; in order to provide a barrier to schoc'!
property located south of this site. The fence was never constructed. In
conjunction with submitting building permit application for expansion of the eiiice
facility, Safeco Insurance Company is requesting that Condition #5 of Board of
County Commissioners' Resolution No. 74-660 be deleted.
. ~
~
~
MMR:cmw ~ s 1 '
Zq foc ~ 71~, NNF c
December 18, 1979 SO/, o 1/iy
Rl~r9 Tn: 1,1arcia P~1. Raines, loninri Arii,iin is1ra'-nr The 6oard has Y'LVl ~'.y~~'ll tIli_' ciL'~aCfled i (2-qLl~"_)L ;.U C1E' le'i,t' ~.,OflUl ~l i)Il 0 iSUb,jeC ~
ZOCte Ci1d11cC .
Jerry NtUl ilaS dUV1 S-C'U tflt EOcii'd i:.lld l. i..~11 S Y'E'CjU~st i 0'l- ci CoI1G1 f 1011 CfIanc~e
shoul d be processed througli the I-Ileari ng Exami ner Conmi ttef
If you have any questions, please call mc.
;
.
,
SAFECO
.
• SAFECOPLAZA
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98185
October 23, 1979
Ms. Marty Raines
Spokane County Zoning Administrator
Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99204
Dear Ms. Raines:
We are writing in regard to the conditions which were attached
to the zone change for the original construction of the SAFECO
Spokane Division Office Building which is located at East 14610
Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington. During the preparation of
the planned addition of approximately 26,000 square feet to the
office building we determined that one of the zone change
conditions attached to the project was not met during the
original construction.
Attached to this letter is Exhibit 1 which is a copy from the
Spokane Co.unty Commissioner's resolution docket (file #74-660).
Please note that on Page 2, Item 5, reference is made to a
security fence which was to have been constructed between 2nd
Avenue and the Milwaukee Railroad tracks. This fence was never
constructed, an apparent unintentional oversight.
Upon discovering this condition we did some further research into
the zoning history of this piece of property. We discovered that
an earlier proposal was made to change this property into
commercial zone for a shopping center. It appears that the
reason for the fence condition was to eliminate the possibility
of children from the school on t he south side of the railroad
tracks cutting across the railroad tracks to the shopping center.
There is no clear documentation of this as fact.
Upon reviewing this condition with your staff it was our opinion
that such a fence would no longer be required as it was in the
original zone change conditions. Therefore, we are requesting
this zone change requirement be withdrawn from the property.
This request is made as a part of the application for building
permit for the addition to the subject property.
Snr Er.() _ IFE iNtii ~4 AN~„E
GENErAL INSU~~aN~..E f•Utilg 'nr~, Or nneE~'11,n
FIR5T NAt10NAl 1NSl1RANl'E l')Mi'A•Jti 1i n+,fi fli.'A
S4{[(1NAT1--)*1AI ItvY iNA•:!-.F ~;-.r,-,
.
- r
i.
October 23, 1979
Ms. Marty Raines
Page 2
If you have any questions please contact our office at any
time or the office of Walker/McGough/Foltz/Lyerla, P.S. who
are the project architects. The contact in that off ice is
Gerald Winkler, 838-8681.
&incerely yours,
, Clln on C. Sherer
Assistant Secretary
SAFECO Insurance Company of America
Jw
..~.ora
.
r~- ~ ~ ^~^,IT c' \ • •._-•.r.,, , .
_r~:~ RD OF CCLN" C~.. J
PG~L.=.
. •
:-1:`I'` U i G i:~,
,~.iT ~ o c.:;
:J 1/4 Gr? i'.....,
2j~ ~GW:i'.uF 25 ,i., i u; G~ 41:, )
i:. , : : Ci::.A;:: C~i.;~i'Y,
1
r.a 'tl.Ier ccmirl3 on re g.:1-. fo: c,,-i'o: c the An-01Z`C;
0: SPo':anf? Cou.-~ -y, r;s:;hin,;t0n, o:1 this
,.~~:.;•in~ 4o the iioazti that the Spo:tsne, Couaty ~'iar::~i.*~~ Cc:rrnio3ion hn~~ v~-n
r.otice ~~f the h~~aring o:~ ~ho 'r,~..~ttLr iz ~he -arzner ;sid iur tho ti.;.e pNo-
tC:3t. Gc'i:.Cl P~.Ln.: 1T:ry lC~-.:::_43Jlvi1 puU'1C M.J.:'ii.~~ a::i
aC,.j t.ii.1t ttE1 Ja1d i',.-•r:.'L` :lty CC.:.m1S:310:1 CO:ICLLT'3 iSl thQ t.l.`'n, t0 .:.G ;e
. ~.>:.io wiza do sc:i'bed p: op~~: ~ty a~ :
.:;7
~1CJ~• of b.l'~ VJ une I~•.V T' V♦ ~,l)~~~•~J•ir„p L7
~,4, lyin.t; r.orLh o~ ~:~e C:cabo, :~i:.kau:tee, St. ra:x7., a:". 'ic
~Ci •IC~►~.1 r c] ti
. .~.........wr ~,•xvPpV 1r,ylt 11.~4N•
h.x. ~,t; 1, r t::z J± ~ppL~ ` 'ca..~:., a- w., .1 the ~
'.~~a. d t~,~ ~e~ti~~z;; o~ .o:.~.:e
- an.:ing Co :,ai 3:j^0n, and r1aVin,3 re•,riewzd the "~.-~•~-ir~^.~z►~ntal ~~3.3-~.3=-_n t
te:;.n co^ ju: cticq :L,h, cor.clucn:3 4-: at t:^.~.3 acticz ~3 a:.:~,;or
: l.'. 'C.~'1.1 V lt C:7t'3 ?:O v•)ri J.~~~:rJ V~.~T 1`l.t 4.1.A i,w 11 Ow l:e C..~~,fl~+
1.....~ V rio p,J1.i or.mzri}..a1 i.+••tIaC. V ia I'IeCo3:;a: f•
. - ---~Y` ~ 77 Tr-I j. ...r+ T /~D I. • 1 1.~ ~./1 ♦ y : . ) ~ :Y' ~ _ 1~ '1 ~ + 7
. • •....~.u~'.i..=i~ ~.J~ i~ .~wJ'~ ~ ~•11V i1~"JrC1~~n7 r~ J~J. • ~.J v~~ C~.• lC.
:)J IJ ^C..3~ C'O:: Ct. _~•.~,_:L.. ~23 C..'a~_ V
~
0=r._.":.ce oAf S1o'A: i.a CoL:..z-,f, acop;.od ::,:,;,as t 27, 1>j3r ai x:.e:.ced.
- - ---r. ~ - • r_ . ~ . ~ O:1 ' ..C 3 '.7Vt'- .-i
~l.► 1'.~:.~:~:..'. ~ ..'L T r. iO~.t-,•?:. v ..,.vt~e?:aC. ..LQ
"i Oe 3L1bvnC V t:0 i.:.•.! ;.0110::1;'ib C0;1d2. t_I.O: 3:
: oac«ay i;7prover,e:-13 for t^- pro ject arez s1ai1 bp bo:aded ;~r wz
. - ~ n O I
J'iOiL%~Ilr' ~.O::i.vlt;f p2,~'.~.E.'-,..1 Q-`i..Ct:! T~='1GT` t.0 Z'C1 ~1c- b
ni t~ (4 he proJ~~ct a: E;1 1I1ClU:~C'- 't::1 t portioa o: t:~c 1tL l/~~ o~,
t &~t.^_ :i'd 1/4 Oi SCCt20:1 2J1 10:•Inil11p 25 1.. , P:m--P_ 44, E.W.M. lyina
i:'-:)L'i.Il Oi ~i.h@ Ch7.Cag0, 16':3iwaUC:e2 , %".ir.• P•11:1 , 2.r1d i%:C:.f iC I L3.i.lY'0a Ci. ~
,
; he D'Irec '-or of i'Ia.~.r.ing s: -11 app.•ovc a spec-4fic larid3Ca-^
fj T ri. Y
A.
~ : r:r.d :?;~rooriatc tibonc: or accc~~,-~1~~:~: :~nt of 1~~doc:~p' n-
.r ~ry ~ ~ • '1 ~n;,:r'-.~ , 1 !:~1'.ir'~i ~T~ t~~i T~, nrn
con..ect on ~-~:-~-r b~:i~.c.±;,.. , 1.
~.~UC.7 PiLltl 3t1.S11 ~.I'it;,l(:i.i..u i,::,~~I"L ~~lUIlE; :
. .~....U~'~.
i11^ Direr, tor Oi Gpi:C2f~C :t~rior
p1w1 for t:e p: o,;ect arca pl,ior ;,o insts? lation c. ~i::cn
uch ?::az :.t:..ll a:,L•_ t o co:,~:.:~~~ ~i::a'.;o:: -,_0
'n.^O,~jr_`C t'~ c.17'ed Zri t:t i L: "Z v0 ad301 :-;.t'..7 I'(.`L1_i.C:t:l t ±.a A.
r tro .i, .
^♦lie cct ~ rea r...~~. • ~
'r . p' J ~ J C Qi. T a t:~:~J ~.~:t~+.1:.t~ it~~ ►C.4i~
..i~;.z no-z~ exc~~~ :i: _ 1..::. :.:.r1 (I~.')) _.~;~...,r~ .f~v~
•~;i .:i? : J~ fCF: tC. i:1 : ',1:.. t'~:;"._.~..~:ii. , . .
Ci...~,. ~ .
eat•~0'l-4 ot';nz:1L3 s :,a1~. ~~~I"
.
' ~ ~ 3l."! LL LL./ V ~ ~ ob-,NrW CQl W%a JJ~Y E.l LrJ
.
thp- accessor.v narl.ir.; nrc,a oc- -,n ~'1.11 sign3 nay bR
i,1.L•t.n.a.raa (,eu prc3vi(lau Li-.a t 'th2-;r aaiimat,ed ;.or fIashing.
5. Sn: t.,nlla"k-O-ion bf the appIietin-t of asecurity fence to bn approyed
h;{ tho Directvr of x lu.,~ning between :econd Avanue and tlio .Iiilwaukea
F•oad tracka.
: a::I) B: TLxA-a'4ARD th:i3 3911-1h dazy of Sept emb.:,_: , 3974.
Li'isi'.D ll." COl.r.Y".L
~ r i .
,.5,-, • . . ~ • _ ~ r, *rrs. . 1+.) i , , i L . l~ t l.i
'L + a .i j •r 1+.+
. 0~ ~lU,uu.:~ ru~~ ~ r
+}r~
J r
~ ~ , • ' • .:'1 ''~.I y '.~•.t,~' J : 3.~.+4+.~. ' r.e
~`l ~"JiU.u1.i 1 D
L.1~f'~. ~ /*►•aa~ r.~1o id +l
c_ ,r t , r`~ J,-~•f~..;. ~,r
--7 . . f f `-r ~r '~'1'~ _
is to certif-j that this is atruc
;i::: carr^ct copy of Resoluuioa '.0. 74-660
-~_L,
Uy C:i'•' o
~j1974 J j~ !
,
/i'~;''"' J" ~`r'~~: J t~ ~t.'L.f~~G.
1., J • . f . y
I }:r-reby eertzfy t..hat I h.?ve # ootQd the abo.-e .
n,_f w cvisiQns vn the Zvr.in ; :in tnc: %ui~ci: s~~; Ccue:~
P-:1cl dO furthe: Cti u".Iy t+Zat
C.1.-"~^.i,'~' ia wh~ za::e c^..:i dCsC,,,+iJed
ub,Dvc ahacri on twhe aWtac: e(i map.
T -
.i t i i
artl...~• `a', •
~
,
~
Watker McGough Foltz Lyerla P S Ni 'YVaII Street P O Box 1482 Spokane Washington 99210 ' 18681
August 6, 1979
Ms Marty Raines
Spokane County Zoning Administrator
Planning Department
N 811 Jefferson
Spokane, WA
Re Safeco Insurance Companies
Spokane - Addition
Our Project #7903
Dear Ms. Raines
Attached to this letter is a copy of our notes from the meeting held
with Ken f.irsch and yourself in your offices on Thursday, August 2, 1979,
relative to the Safeco expansion. Please review them to make sure that
our understanding of the outcome is correct If anything is questionable,
please feel free to call at any time for a clarification
We appreciate your time and look forward to working with you i,n the future
on this and other_ projects
Sincerely,
WALKER McGOUGH FOLTZ LYERLA, P.S
/Gerald A Winkler, AIA
GAW sd
Enclosure
~I V
AU G i 1919
~ SPOKANE coA~T~iENT
, PLAN~It~O{ DEP
8ruce M Walker A I A John W McGough F A I A Watter W Foftz A I A Jack M Lyerla P E Gordon E Ruehl A I A. George H Nachtsheim Gerald P Adkins
r ~
~ YJatker McGough Fottz Lyeria P S North 120 WaU Street P Q Box 1482 SCOkare Wastiingtan 992fU 868'
~
MEMORANDUM
TO The File
FROM: Gerald A. Winkler, AIA
/
- DATE August 5, 1979
SUBJECT Minutes of the Meeting held
August 2, 1979
Safeco, Spokane - Addition
Dur Project #7903
Parties in Attendance•
Marty Raines, Spokane County Zoning Administration
Ken Kirsch, Spokane County Planning Department
Gerald A Winkler, wMFL
The purpose for this meeting was to dlscuss the proposed expansTOn
plans for the Safeco, Spokane Divis7on office building The following
7tems were reviewed
Item #1 - We reviewed the approved site plan which was a part vf the
original proposal for the zone change on the Safeco property in 1974
The 1974 plan listed the following projected building areas
Phase I 73,700 Sq Ft
Phase II• 87,700 Sq Ft (cumulative)
Phase III 113,680 Sq Ft (cumulative)
Safeco's current plans call for the following areas
Phase I 76,400 Sq Ft (existing)
Phase II• -~10U,000 Sq Ft (cumulative)
Phase III• 120,800 or 125,600 Sq Ft (cumulative)
At the time of Phase III eompletion, the building would be 6% ta 10%
larger than that approved in the zone change Marty stated that there
would be no problem with this and that we were basically in conformance
with the approved plan
Item #2 - We reviewed the conditions to the original zone change It
turns out that the requirement of a fenee between the ra7lroad and 2nd
Avenue were never been met in the original construction We discussed
this matter to some extent Marty indicated that she wauld visit the
szte on Monday, August 6, 1979 to determine whether the fence is still
needed if it is not, this requirement wvuld be removed if Marty
approves this action Monday, 1JMFL is to submit a written request that
it be made official
Bruee M Walker A I A John W McGougfl F A! A Watter W Folu A I A JaCk M tyerla P E Gordon E^4ehl A i A George n,.~-ntsheim 5'-ra1d P hW~t-t
C ~
~
~i Minutes of Meeting Held -
August 2, 1979 ~ Safeco, Spokane - Addition
Our Project #7903 - Pabe 2
Item #3 - We did some rough calculations on the siZe of the parking
lot WMFL will provide, to Marty, accurate square foot areas so a
correct determination,can be made as to 'the exact number of parking
spaces required
Item #4 - A SEPA check list for the expansion will be submitted to
the County Building Department
. GAW dt
Routing
Marty Raines - Spokane County Zoning Administration
C1 i nt Sherer - Sa,feco
Don Liberty - Safeco
Paul Inman - Inman & Associates
Joe Doy,le - Doyle & Associates
Gerald Winkler - WMFL
llV
I -3~-m7(
waiocer McGoug, =31u Lyeria P S ts and Engineers West 244 Main Avenue P O Box 1482 e Washington 99210 509i838 8661
rz--oo-4 I-loo 's; 3,
1-1-0-0 tv, 0 _
460 ~ o
, ~
,
~
L 00Is-
~
F'E0504- WEL OFFtCES - ~~--0 60~ 3
_ cO r4x*4-5 20 ~ ~
.44
~ m
CtPCU1A.44 OO-Z; ~
ML
_ OF-FKE._A-_ _ ~.e..0 lope
A&,L.
A jba~
R ~
~
DEC, o 4 19?9
Bruce M Walker FAIA John W McGougn FAIA Watter W Foltz AIA Jack M lyerla PE Gordon E Ruehl AIA George H Nachtsheim AIA Gerald P Adkins AIA
e
\
~
t ~ , ~ . ~ . , .
z
rK
~ If 4,
` O' C_..~~1 ~l rr•~G ~i~W1(SS I d~ ~
Po ~ ~cS.~C., !
~~►~N,N~ l1z4F-riG Dlalslod
~
S
~
,
ALr (-D a~2 ~E v~ E~l o i= _
~
- - -1~ C
UB~1~ T i C - - 7-J L-ocATCD
- - ~LT ~ 'Pr2.AG uE ,4\/C o,,l 0 C A-,./ O AD-,qA-s t2~e-D
7+A E S>r-,J< a,J c-- I/Alc.eY -
geQL- I C, naE-Rq_ ~ o,,4S A r,\14) C,
~..~E~ I rn ~A C....TS Or~l T~-l ~ E?C / S 7-i~/~ ,~A ~7
al6'~
! E.t"✓1 nO C 7- f~12.oPd5CD ,~E~/~0/9'IF~ ~
Anla , 2CawL."/ t,--D 14
i _ _ ~ - ~
~ 1
,
~
~ .+~~_F~1_~ co~~r Tc.~ ~S
7 ,
,
_ ' _ _C~.~ ~ ~ r~ ` ~a~J i r~ U i~✓~~--~'a
W0 v 4 LSD 8 - --o4RA-2f r
K_ TL
,
P: 2, p Tr .Tm~
i
_ ; _ p►.t ~ I `f ~►~v~ I Lj c~c/~
~ .
,
--2-E 1/I F llq 0
~ lTr- A-•~/ ~~~~~•~i~/G
- - - - ,r--
~
- I _ C~~~F ~~.p~
~
- - ~S AfL-Cck(-4s=-- f ~~-~U/-~1~ z (/r~-n ca~7-
' - ~ ~~u?A c,,oG 44,r ~C1_.C` 7wov ~wC 5/ 7
_h4 L-'S, 14 As_ a~ Lr4_
&\C 1~J _(2~ S/_DEuia.e KS.
.
- Lso
_
_ _ C.t~ A►_J_G~ _ _[Z~~t~ ~r ~f G_ _7~~ ~n'1 a~2~'l~~~~~- _
- - - - 2 nd S T--,q -r-Eo- ---j-/-1 4- T_
Ir
- -
_peA.~!a/E~6qz~ _C. -
~~..~~J2Jir-1 _pAc11 A6_ _.Dor-7 -4 Pi
~ - - -
~
f
8
s
,
7
~Lr A ~ ~ ~ . , t~ ~ ~ ~ •
,
t 20r2,
~
,
.
~ Duj~~ ' ~ 0_ ~ ~1...8 ~ r..~/7"7..~~'~''-t
LZ t-y L&LoLnj~Fi7i A TELk/
,
4 f:::: n V-Ee A
s
061 C c 7-~A~ AC.4~~ _ A~~~~.- Zje~- &&VS1,0E
~
v~J(J E Wr c c ~ JT~ S-)PrJ C- .77LIG:
a
- - ' I.~ E (E~Z 1L A r%J -7 ,LA A4-/ G r14-e- 6.1?E6
,
~
7 --a- LDFuJ A U Ir %:z --!s~'~~ ~L-f~ J~~
~
-DAC-_ A D o ,U,,JC;
-r-,~
u~--~A-T U-20d
~o_VSA A-.c i ~ot-4 O-=" TH OA2/1 iMAL.
;
,
.4 ri r) _ 'T?+C A^J A C.:. P24 u I S r o
'I
P7 /,DEw Q
, - - „
1 . _
I~r-l4 ,-7- 7 7-1C" -AJA✓' T~ u ~-7 T"~i'~
F ~
C _4-kJQ 4 U 7 c_ 77~1 rf- /G
T_~,nn. ► r-~ ~ ~~~~~s~~ ~ Iq r.-.,
i
_nl~~.~'~cs.~~ ~r CZ~sT~~
i
~
i
~ ~ - ~ - -A J~ Cs, .U 7~ca_ ~/-~~1%v 17 C.:~- ----~1-c~ `~f~~ -
~
- rzz-
~
~
~U T~ F2
,
' 7106 ~ ~~c f:::: 0~,~57/ e
r--
_ >1 jl3_n_ A1_ ~A _ U7L) 2
~
a c/ l =~ETO'A/_: 5' a
,
~ ~~1_.S'i_4,
~
- - - - - l- - - ' - t+ ~ -~~r---• _ _ i
~ ~
_ ~ ~
~
1
,
i
~
,
\
MEMORANDUM
SQptember 18, 19 74
TO. Boar3 of County Comrrussioners
FROM: John D. Konen, Zoning Adnunistrator
6
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment - Safeco Regional Headquarters Bldg.
ZE-34-71
Our office r.as conducted an environmental assessment of an office building proposal
for Safeco Insurance Company vf Amenca in conjunction with the final.ization of
ZE-34-71, Agncultural to Commercial, Sherwood and Roberts. The site is situated
on the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue on a parcel of land legally descnbed
as follows.
That portion of the NE 4- of the 1VW 4 of Section 23, Township 25 N.,
Range 44, E.W. M., Spokane County, Washington de scnbed as follows:
Beginning at a point which is 2 0' V1l and 50' S of the N 1/4 comer of
said Section 23; thence S 0°06'36 "W, along the W line of Adams Road,
601.44' to the N nght of way line of C. M., St. P.&P. Railroad,
thence S89058' 33 "W , along said nght of way, 39 3.9 3', thence
N0°08'24"E, 60.00'; thence N89°58'33"W, 466.07', thence N0°06'36"E,
561.811 to the S line of Sprague Avenue; thence E, along s aid S lzne,
845.00'; thence S36047'58"E 24.98' to the point of beginna.ng.
In accordance with the Planning Commission hearing of April 30, 1971, that portion
of the N'E 1/4 of the N1IV 1/4 of Sectlon 23 lying N of the Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul and Pacafic Rail.way except the W 910 feet was approved for Commercial
Zoning subject to seven conditi.ons applicable to the entire ownership which inciude$
the 910' to the west (which is currently zoned Commercial and Local Business). A
shopping center was proposed for the 1300' x 610' site at the Apnl 30, 19 71 hearing.
Conditions were imposed by the Comrrussion relating to the deda.cation and improve-
ment of Second Avenue through the project area, widerung and improvement of Adams
Road, and dedication and improvement of a new north-south street. In addition, the
Commission required submittal of a landscape and lighting plan, restncted signs,
and re quired a secunty fence along the railroad right of way.
The shopping center proposal has been essentially altered by the proposal of Safeco
Insurance Company of America to construct a regional headquarters office build.ing
within an 860' X 600' site situated on the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Adams Road. The staff has reviewed the submitted plans and has recommended certain
adjustments to accommodate the office project and to assure compatibility with adjoin-
ing uses. These adjustments include sidewalks along Sprague Avenue and a wider landsca
strip between Sprague Avenue and the Phase III parking area.
-1-
1
1 ~
.
. ~
~
In our opinion, the office proposal will have less potential impact on surrounding
properties than the previously proposed shopping center. The 10.9 acre site
would accommodate a 73,700 square foot building with 205 parking stalls at the
compietion of Phase I culminating wifih a 113..680 square foot bua.lding and 409
parking stalls at the completion of Phase 3. The west 230' of the sitA would be re-
served for futuFe development. The vuilding would not exceed three stories in
height. The structure would be situated in the northeast corner of the ownership
set back approximately 501 from the Sprague Avenue and 5 0' from Adams Road. Are as
to the south and wes t would be utilized for parking. The building would be designsd
as a single purpose office to accommodate Safeco's functional requirements. Although
a final architectural design has not been selected for the building, inspection of
photographs of simi4ar division offices reveals generous landscaping, subtle sigrung
and lighting, and aesthetic architect~are suited to suburban locations.
In accordance with the Planning Commission recommendation, a landscape plan will
be required for the project. Preliminary submittals indicate generous landscape
allowance s around the building and extending to Sprague Avenue and Adams Road.
Additional landscape screening is anticipated to effectively screen the parking lots
from Sprague Avenue, Adams;Road, and Second Avenue. A spnnkler system will
serve the landscaped areas.
In accordance with further Planning Comma.ssion recommendations, the project will
have low profile lighting in parking areas. Sigrung will be complimentary to the
building and onented toward Sprague Avenue. The sign, including its base, wzll be
about 14' x 8' in size or smaller with a total height between 8' and 14' and double
- face plexiglass with modest intensity.
A package treatment plant will be situated in the south central portion of the site
for sewage disposal. Landscaping and fencing will be employed to reduce the visual
impact of the facility. Storm water generated on the site wili be hanclled by dry wel.ls.
The site can be served by established utilities such as water, electricity, gas,
telephone and refuse collection.
The Safeco office building will ini.tially employ 213 people. Within ten years, the
facility will be employing 458 people, The firm has selected the site because of
the large residential labor supply in the immediate residential areas. Over half of
the employees will be women. The operation consists pnmanly of processing and
reviewing insurance policies, bonds, claims, etc. Most of the business is forwarded
and received by U. S. mail. No large scale delivenes are anticipated other than
office supplies, stationery, insurance forms, manuals, etc.
Approximately 205 car parking spaces wa.].1 be provided dunng the Phase I operation.
If more tnan 250 car parking spaces are antica.pated, the firm would be obliged to
apply ior a complex source review through the Spokane County Asr Pollution authorifiy.
Because the site is located near the labor market, a.t is anticipated that the faciiity
will not appreciably contnbute to air pollution in the Spokane Metropolitan area arid
will conserve energy by reducing transportation demands with3.n the Metropolitan area.
-2-
r~
,
V~
r ?
{
1 ~
~
The required rights of way and roadway improvements will provide for better traffic
flow in the area and will alleviate traffic and safety impacts on adjoining roadway.
Employees will arrive at work from 7:00 to 8•00 A.M. and will leave at 4.30 P.M.
School hours in the area range from 8•30 A.M. to 3.30 P.M. Road systems in the im-
mediate area are designed beyond present capacity and can accommodate the additional
traffic movements. The Spokane County Enq=pr's office has recommended that
sidewalks be ilicornorated into e or ct, especiallX alon .cS . rague- Avenue to improve
peaestnan convenienGe and sa►fety. As other properties in the area develop, pedestnan
activity wlll increase ± The requested improVements should be adequate to handle
anx future increases in pedestnan and auto traffic resulting from the expansions of
the Safeco office project in future ve-ars.
The site a.s situated wrthin the urban3zed port3on of the Spokane Valley. Cultivation
and residential development durinq the last 50 years have changed the natural charac-
teristtcs of the area. The property is part of the gently undulating Garnson Gravel
formation of the Spokane Valley. The property gentley slopes from Sprague Avenue
down to the Milwaukee Road tracks. No extensive excavata.on or topographic disturb-
ance is anticipated. The proposal will not appreciably affect geology or topographic
conditions. S.
In review, landscaping and other mitigating measures will adequately buffer the
facility from residential developments to the north of Sprague Avenue and south of
the Milwaukee Road tracks, The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the site is appro-
priate for commercial and office development, and the surround2ng land uses reflect
_ the implementation of the plan. Mitigating measures have also been taken to assure
adequate and safe vehicular and pedestrian movement. The facility will have no apprec-
iable effect on exi.sting topography, geology, or aquatzc conditions.
Although the bioloqical and botarucal characterista.cs of the site have been altered by
urbanization, generous landscaping will temper the impact of the building and assoc-
iated parking area. Air pollution levels will be reviewed when the car parking area
is proposed to exceed 250 spaces. We, therefore, conclude that proper mrtigating
measures and considerations have been reviewed and that an environmental impact
statement for the project is not required for the zone change request.
ADDITIONAL COMMENT: e
Supplemental information regarding the operation of the facility, employee considera-
tlons, cost of the project, and economic effect are contained in a 16 page report
with exhibits provided by the Safeco Insurance Company and Paul A. Clausen,
attorney for Safeco.
-3-
,
~
fi
- - - „y~~i - ~ . _ _ ' M1 _ ± _ . . ~ . _ . _ ~ - . T.~- ~ _ -r` - ' ~ t
r
J
1!
V l
Yj BOARD OF COU= CONSZISSI0,1fMS PAGE TWO
; zF,-34--71
the accessory parkang area or pedestrian mallo All eigns ma.y be
Zllum3nated,provz.ded that they shall not be aui_~ted nor flashzuge
5e Installafi.ion by the applicant of a security fence to be approved
by the Director of Planuulg between Secand Avenue and the Ydlwaukee
Road trackse
PASSID BY THE BQARD this 19th day of September4 1974.
BOARD OF COUNl'Y CONlMISSIONERS r
OF SPOKANE C4UNI'Y$ WASFnXGT011T
e
-
0
-00
z
AT~i'F.ST :
V'rMON ~T OHIAND Cler'k the d
~ - /
,
Thus is to certify that this a.s a true
and correct copy of Resolution No. 74-660
passed oy he Bo this 19th day of
Sep~embe ; 19740
By ~ ; ~ ~ L/Gl%-Gc=C
,
I hereby certif'y that I have posted the above changes
and revi.ezons on the Zon3ng Map a.n the Bwlding Codes
Department9 and do further certify tha.t the zone
clasaifzcat3on cbange ie the same as described
above a.ad ahown oa the atta►ched mapo
,
sz~e l .
DAT~: 1-7 ~ ' . . .
~
i - ~
~
r ~
NO.
,
Br.s~~0R& TIM BOAEiD OF COIINTY Ca ►SSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH-ING'i'Q.Y `
.
zt,-34-71 _
4
.IN rIME NIATT ..F'tt OF C'rIANGIYi GTHE ZOiVMG MAP )
F110.2=1 AGRICULZ'URAL TO C021GEMCIAL OiV PROPERTY )
LocxLnm nv THE NE, 1/4 oF Tim Nw 1/4 op } xMoLUTzaN,
sEeTzoLN 239 Tow,YSW 25 N. , RANGE 44, )
E.W.rI,, SPOKANE COUN'I'Y9 WASHIi1IGiT0iN ) J
The above-entitled matter comin,g on regularly for hearing before the Boa.rd
_ oF Count3r Conmnssioners of Spokane County, Washzngton,-on this day, and Zt
appeazzng to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commiesion has given
due notice oY the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the tzme pro- _
v3.ded by 1ax; tha't ~9a.1C1 PIaT3231II$ COJimi9910II be39 h21.C1 a public hearzng as
reqw.red; and that the sazd PlanaZng Comuisaioal cvacure Zn the plan to zone
the following deacriied property as e _
C0,1 CIAL:
Tiictt p0~ ~f the 1E 1A oj the NW 1/4 of Seatiom 23, `TownshZ,p 25 Ne'
Range 44, E eW.Mv lying north of the Chieago 9 Milwaukee g Ste Paul, anti Pae=c
Railroad, except the Weat 910 feeto 4
THE, BOARD, having heard the teatimony of the Applicant and the Spokane
County► Planaing Co=iasion, and having reviewed the Envirozsmental Asses9rnent -
sub,ni-Itted in conjuatetion t#erewn.th, concludes that this actaon Za a major
action, but that it does nbt aignificantly affect the quality of the environ~
rnent and that no environmeatal a.mpact stateraeaat i9 necessazya
NOW, Z'HMrr""tORED BE lfi RESOLVED, that the above-ciescrzbed propert7 be, and the
eama hereby ie zoned vuder the classificatioa of COMMMCIAL as defined in t
the Zvnzag Ozdiaaace of Spokane Couaty, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. '
AND FvMMM BE IT RESOLVF'.D that any development on the above-deacribed
propert3t shall be aubjeet to the following conditionse
l. Roadway improvennents for the project areQ shall be bonded, with
the Spokane Com-ty Eagineer's Office prior to release of bw.ldzng
pzrmits (the project area includes that portion of the NE 1/4 of
the NW 1/4 of Sectiors 23, Township 25 N. , Range 44, E.W.M. lying ,
north of the Chicago, Milwaudee, St. Paul, and PacZPic RaZlroad<)
2. The Director of Planuing sbal.l apprave a specific landscape
plan arLd appropriate bond for acco~ali9hment of landscaping requiree
ments ia connection with any bu1].cl.Zng permit issued w2th3.n the pro ject
area (suoh plan ahall ind3.cate appropmate treatment along Spragus
Avenue) o
3e The Di.rector of 'Platmvng shall approve a apecifia exterior
lighting plan for the project axea prior to installatian of such
lzghtinge (Such plan sball attempt to confine illumination to
the pro3eet area wa.t,h f1tZ.l considerata.an to adjoining residential -
propertie9).
4. The project area may have one (1) free-standing center identi-
ficatiaai sign not exceeding one hundred and fifty (150) aquare feet
in area and 35 feet Zn height. Permanent exterior sigaa for
incLtvidual eatab].Z9hments shall, when exceedirig, forty (40) aqvare
feet ia area, be placed flat against the bwlcling facing a stree 'u,
- M
}
t f
c E D
,
M AY 1197 5
3rJg~ANt COLlN s Y
y'LANEVI(VC CoNiPvIISSIqN
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT BOND # 2592844
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, Tha.t we, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA of Spoka.ne, Washington, as Principal, and GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA a corporation organized and existing under the la.ws of the
State of Washmgton and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of
Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound to the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington s Obligee, in the penal sum of
FIFTY THOUSAND AND N01100 ($50, 000.00) OLLARS, lawful money of the
United States of America, for the pa.yment of which, well and truly to be made, the
Pruicipal and Surety bmd themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 29thday of April, 1975.
WHEREAS, the said Principa.l is the developer of a tract of I.and in Spokane County
kiown a s
That portion of the NE4 of the NW4 of Section 23, Township 25N., ~
Range 44E,, W.M., Spokane County, Washmgton described as
follows•
Beginning at a point which os 20' W and 50' S of the N4 corner of
said Section 23; thence S 0 06 36 W, along the W luie of Adams
Road, 601.44' to the N right of way luie of C,M., St. P. & P.
Railroad, ~hence S89°58'33"W, along said right of way, 393.93,
the~ce NO 08`24"E, 60.00'; thence N89°58t33"W, 466,07', thence
NO 06'36"E, 561.81' to the S line of S~rague Avenue; thence E,
along said 5 line, 845.00'; thence S36 47'S8"E 24.98' to the pomt
of beginnuig,
and said County ha.s required tha.t a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay
the cost of construction, installation and implementation of the l.andscape plan in-
cluding an automatic lawn irrigation system at the site of the SAFECO Insurance
Company of America Spokane Division office builduig on property situated in Spoka.ne
Countp as described above a.nd showx1 on a detailed landscape plan recently submitted
to the County Pla.nning Director of Spoka.ne County, Washuzgton, as prepa.red by
The Perron Partnership P. C., Landscape Architects of Spoka.ne, Washmgton and
Portland, Oregon and Walker/McGough/Foltz/Lyerla, Architects, Spokane, Washington;
such improvements to be completed in two years or less time unless said ti eriod
be extended at the option of the Pl,anning Director of Spoka.ne County.
Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein withui
the time authorized, the Obligee sha.ll look to the Surety for satisfaction to the extent
of this bond.
The obligation of tlus bond sha.ll be kept in full force and effect until, i.n the opmion
of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated ha.ve been satisfied m whi.ch event
written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant
such release and the Surety hereby waives all right to release from the obligatlon
except as herein stated.
A p~' ~ ~D P. S T 0 i-l' M SAFECO SUR.ANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA _
~ .
day o t
untersigned by• GENERA I SURANCE (dOMPANY OF AMERICA
, ; t• , ~ F.i
as ington Rdsid t~~- - Z,ej BjT re , G~. • ~ _
-
~ us e - n
et get
h
SAFECO INSUF CE COMPANY OF AMERICA
~1► GENERAL INSL.L..-,NCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
HaME OFFICE SAFECa PLAZA SEATTLE, WASNINGTON 98185
POWER OF ATT4RNEY
4339
No
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
That Safeco Insurance Compaay of Amenca and General Insurance Company of Amenca, each a Waslungton
corgoration, does each hereby appoint
KAREN E. CLUSTER
rts true and lawful attorney(sl-in-faet, with fiill authonty to execute on its behalf fidehty and surety bands or undertakmgs
and other documents af a sunilar character issued m the course of its business, and to bind the respectave company thereby
IN WI1'PdESS VYHEREOF, Safeco Insurance Compaay of Ame.nca and Genaal Insurance Company of Amenca have each
executed and attested these presents
27th September 73
th~s day of , 19
W 0 HAMkfEflSLA SECRFTARY GORDON H SWEANY PRESIpEKT
CERTIFICATE
Extract from Artiele VI, Sectian 12, of the By-Laws of SAFECU lnsurance Company of Amenca
and of General Insurance Company of Amenca
"Article VI, Section 12, FIDELITY AND SURETY BlJNDS _ the President, any Vice President, and the Secretary shall
each have authonty to appomt ind.ivduals as attorneys-in-fact or under other appropriate titles with authonty to execute on
behaZf af the company fideLty and surety bonds and other documents of sunilar character issued by the compariy m the
course of its busmess On any mstrument malung or evidencr.ng sueh appointment, the signatures raay be affixed by
facsimile Qn any wstrument confemag such authonty or on any bond or undertakmg of the company, the seai, or a
facsmiile thereof, may be unpressed or affixed or m any other manner repraduced, provided, however, that the seal shall not
be necessary tv the vaLdrty of any such instrument or undertakmg "
Extract from a Resolutaon of the Board of Duectors of SAFEGO Inswance Company of Amenc,a and
of General Insurance Company of Amenca adopted July 28, 1970
"On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an asmstant secretary of the Company settmg out,
(i) The provisions of Article VI, SecLon 12 of the By-Laws, and
(u) A copy of the power-of-attorney appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and
(ui) Certifying that swd power-of-attorney appointment is in full foree and effect,
the signature of the certifying otFicer rnay be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsunile therevf "
I, Wm Hammersla, Vice President and Secretary of SAFECO Insurance Company of America and of General Insurance
Company of Amenca, do hereby certi.fy that the foregoing extracts of the By-I.aws and of a Resolution of #he Board of
Duectors of these corporations, and of a Power-of-Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the
By-Laws, the Resolutivn and the Powea-of-Attorney aze stffl in full force andl effect
IN WITNESS WHEIiEOF, I haee hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimle seal of each corporatian
thts 29th day of Avril , 1975
co~'~` c
O
~ GO@tPRq ~Q~
~ ~ '~i~~~ 'r•
~ S E A L SEAL ~ W D kAMMERSIA SECRETARY
a
xS 974 R4 3/73 :.1953
WA~`~ ~Q~wB~'~p~ PRINTEO IN U 5 A
R`
.
, ~ . r h~`~'~ ~~l~-~~'~ ~~i~► ~ ~"T'=~'
.
~
51 ah&M( COVMfy COyAT MOVS!
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Introduction• The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RC dll,
requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values
botli #or their own actions and when licensing prfvate proposals. The Act also iequitcs
that an F.nvironmental Impact Statement be prepared for all inajor actions significantly
(and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting [he quality of [he environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved detei mine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
, Please answer the followi»g questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "m3ybe" if, in your
opinfon, even only slihht impacts w11I result. The reviewers of the chrcl.list will be
aware of and concern themselves with the dectree of imoact, asking you for more infoima-
tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or whPrF you
believe an explanation tNould be helpful to government decision-makers, lnclude your
eaplanation in the space provided, or use addxtional paqes, if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are
relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessacy delay.
Tlie following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be fnvolved to complete their environmental review now,
withouC duplicating paperwork in the future.
No application shall Ue processed until the checklist has been completed and returneti
to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes"
and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required
to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE. This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not
apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and
continue on to ttie next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Propotient: Safeco 1 nsurance Company of Amer i ca
2. Addtess and Phone Number of Proponent Safeco Plaza
Seattle, WA 98185
Qontact Mr. Clint Sherer (206) 545-5697
3. D3tc Checkiist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist• Sookane County, Wal,
5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable•
Safeco, Spokane Division Addition
-1-
(IF SPACE FOR 1:XPL1INATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACI[ 11nDITIUNAL P/►GES.)
d. Nature c-ind [3riei Descrfption of the Prupu >u1 (including hut not limlE:ki lo its ;,iza-
general d~~ ion elements, and other fA( <urs that will give an accuratF under-
standing o; tl, scope and nature)
Safeco tnsurance Company proposes to construct a 26,000 sq. ft.
addition to their existing 76,500 sq. ft Spokane Division Ottice
Buildinq The project is located on 10 9 acres of land on the
south west corner of the intersection of Sprague and Adams. Thenew construction will be two story office space with some toilet
room and mechanical space provided. The new space will be con-
stCucted of materials 5imilar to those of the existinQ buildinq.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of t}Ze proposal, as well as the
extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other
information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting
of the proposal)
The proiect is located at East14610 Spraque, Spokane, Washington
The addition will occur on the south side of the existing building,
coverinQ aaDroximatelv 12*000 sq ft of qround The proposal in-
cludes a 15,750 sq ft. expansion of the existing parking lot Re-
• ~e r_ to Exh i b i t# 1_ s i te_..R 1La she a rea i n wh i c _i the p ro jec t i s to be
located is mixed commercial and multi-unit residential.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Froposal•
January 1, 1980
9. I.ist of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal
(federal, state and local - including rezones):
Building permit - Spokane County
10a. Do you,or the owner tn the event you do not own the subject land, haue any
plans for future addttions, expanslon, or further activity rLlated to or con-
nected wlth thls propos-al ? If yes, explain•
This construction constitutes Phase II of Safeco's planned
growth for the faci l i ty. Phase M or'-Tie cons~r
the addition of an approximate additional area of 21,000 to 26,000
sq, ft. of office space. This will ali occur on itneir present's1Te.
lOb. Do you own or have options on lann nE arby or adiacent to this proposals
locatlon9 If yes, explain
No.
llo Do you knoa► of any plans by others lricluding the owner which may affect tho
property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby9 If yes, explain
None other iLhan the expansion of their existing facility.
12. Actach any other application form that has been completed regarciing the proposal
if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at somc, future daEe,
describe the nature of such application form
Attached is a copy of Safeco's original Environmental Assessment
for the project dated April 1975-
II. ENVIRONMLNTAL IMPACrS
(E~cplanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
Yes Nfaybc X.
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in -
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
structures? . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . ;(x -
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering
of the soil7 . . , ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ , XX
-2-
.1
. .
~ ~ .
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONIIL F^ CS,)
i es Maybe IVo
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features 7. , XX
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
, geologic or physical features > . . . . . . . . . . , XX
(e) Any increese in wind or water erosion of soils, either
on or off the site? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XX
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or s tream or the bed of
the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation: (b) App rox i ma te 1 y 12,000 sq. f t . of s i te w i 1 1 be cove red by '
the new building construction and approximately 15,750 sq. tt. wiil
be covered by the addition to the parkinq lot.
(c) Only to allow for correct surface drainage.
' Z. Air. Will the proposal result in.
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality7... X
(b) The creatfon of objectionabla odors ? . . . . . . . . . ..X,.
(c) Alteration of air movement, moiscure or temperature, X
or any change in climate, either locally or reqionally? ~
E2iplanation
3. Water. Will the proposal resulk in• Yes Maybe N-i
(a) Change in cunents, or the course or direction of X
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters7
(b) Changes in absocption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff .X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters 7 X
(d) Chanqe in the amount of surface water in any water
body 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . .
(e) DEschargQ into surface waters, or in any alteration
of su:face water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity") X
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground
wa ters 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations 7 . . . . . . . . -X-
(h) Deterioratfon in qround water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
ar other suhstances into the ground waters? x
(i) Redlaction in the amount of water otherwlse availaale
fo- public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explan3tion ,
-3 -
.
. . ~ ,
, ~ .
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATF, PLLASE ATTACFT 11DD1TIONAL PF,GES )
Yes MI+1
4. Flora. Will the p,oposal result in
(a) Cliange in thc diversity of specie5, or numbers of
any species )f flora (including tr( es, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . . . , . * . . x X
(b) Redu~rion of the numhers of any unique, rare or
endali3ered species of flora ? . . . . . . . . . . . ,
(c) Introduction of new species of flcra into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing specfes ? . . . , 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . X X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agcicultural crop 9 ...x X
Explanation
Yes Maybe N-3
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in ~
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, ~
insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna ) . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or
result in a barrier to the migration ur morement of fauna? . XX
(d) Detenoration of existinq fish or wildlife habitat? XX
Explana tion
Yes M 3yor No
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing nofse levels? . _XXX _
Explanation Noise levels will be higher during construction and
EhWre may-be some t'ncrease ii raffi c no i se on S7-p-Pague
and Adams due to the increase in persons that will travel
to tne site.
Ye s Maybe No
7. LiRht and Glare. Will the proposal pro~duce new light or glare? XX)
Explanation
lES Maybe N3
8. Land Use. VI,'ill the proposal result in the alteration of the XXX
present or planned land use of an area ~ . . . . . . , . , . ~
~ Explanatfon•
-4-
r
•
a
(IF SPACE FQR EXPLANATIf3N IS INADEQUAT£, pIEASF. ATTACH ADr?ITIbNAI 1': CESi.)
Yes Mavt3e No
9. Natural Resources. Wzll the prvposal result in
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? A
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
Explana tion
Y(1 s M Libe N 10. Risk of i]T)set, Does the proposal fnvolve a risk of an
explvsion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not lfmfted to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radfatfon) X
in the event of an accident or upset conditions l .
Explanatian
Yes Mdybe No
11. Fopulation. Wfll the proposai alter ttte location, ~
distnbution, density, or growth rate o the human
population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . , , . X
Explanation Safeco tends to hi re thei rpeople from the local labar
market.
12. HousinQ. Wfll the proposal affect existfng housing.or
create a demand for additionai housi►iq ? . . . . . . . . . _X
EYp1,3nation
Yes Maybe No ,
13. Transportation/Clrculatfon, Will the proposal result in ~
(a) Generation of additfonal vehicular rnovement? . X
(b) Effects an existing parking facilities, or demand for
new parking ? . « . . . . . . . . . . . . . _.X
(c) Impact upon existing Cransportakion systems ? . . . . . x
(d) Alterations ta present patterns of Girculatton or
movement of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . x
(e) Alteratians to waterborne, rail or air traffir? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehfcles, X
bicyclists or pedEStrians? . . . . . . , . . . . . _
Exnlanation (aj There--w.,LL,t be an i ngrease i n traff i c due to--the
increased nur-ber of employees that will travel to the site.
(f) There may be due to the increase in traffic along
AdaFA
-S-
P
♦
(II' SPACE FOR T\PLANIITION IS INfiDEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Mr+'~e No
14. Public Ser,~~.ces. Will the proposal have an effect upon, ~
or result 111 43 iieed for new or altered governmental services
in any oI the following areas?
(a) Fire proto-ction? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(h) Police pCQCCCtiOtl7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(C) `?lriorls • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
(ct) par4 a .2 )0~cr recreational facilities? . , . , , , . . x
(c) Mai,oton inrc vf publie facilitfes, incZuding roads? X
(f) Uther qnrrrnment-il services 7 . . . . . . . , . . . X
Fxalanation
Yes Maybe No
rt',t-i'r?y Will elic, nropasa] result in
(3) U90 of sLbstantia1 amaunts of fuel or energy x
(u) Dem3nr3 upc7n e,istincl svurces of energy, or requfre
t?,e cic*w~lopsr, >>zt of nevi saurces uf energy? x
~ ,s31 -w<tt lr]n
Yes Mavbe No
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result an a need far new
system 7, or alterations to khe #o3lowing utilities:
-
(a) Power or natural gas ? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) Communication systems? , . . . . . . . . . . . . x
~
(c) W3ter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . , . , , . . . . . . . . x
(e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . • . • X
(f) Solid w8ste and disposal? . . . . , , . . . . . . x
Explanation. A1 1 ut i 1ities are al readv i n ex i stence at the present
bui lding.
Yes Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will the proposal res ilt in the creatfon of
any hoaltli }iazard or potential health f 3zard (exeluding x
menlal health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • •
Explanalion , -
- 6 -
4 ~
-----r m-
o
r
i
(IF £PACE FOR DCPLIINATION IS INADEQUATE, P E11SE 11TTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
,
,
, Yes Mayb, Vo
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result In the obstruction of
any scentc vista or view open to the piblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of,an aest}-etically offensive sate X
oPen to Public view7 . ~
, . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ~
Explana tiurn
- ~
l `
r -
, ~ -
~r
-
,
Ycs MaybA r,O
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result In an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities 7.. ~
Expl ina tion
~
~
Yes Maybe No
20. Archeoloqical/Histoncal. W'Lll the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeologicczl or historical site,
structure, object or building 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
Explanation '
~ r
I
~
i
t
III. SIGNATURE ~
I
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of pehury that the above responses are
made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also *derstand that, should there be
any willful miscepresentatton oc willful lack o f full dtsclosuce on my part, Spokane County
may wtthdraw any declaratlon of nonslgnlficance that tt intght issue ln reliance uFon this
checkltst,
~
~
Date• Propone :
~
(Please Print or Type) ~
Proponent Clinton C. Sherer, Assistant,5ecretary, Safeco tnsurance Co. of
I Nmerica
Address: Safeco Plaza, Seattle, tJA 98185
(206) 545-5697 1
Phone:
I
Person completinq form: Ge ra 1 d A. IJ i n k 1 e r, Wa 1 ke r McGou4h Fo 1 t z Lve r'1 a. P,S T
Phone: (509) 838-8681 ~
Date:
,
~
'
Dapt. or Office of County Reviewinq Checklist• Spokane County Bui1 dinq Depa rtment
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist• I
° II71ll
-7-
I
a
. ,L.
4FFICE 0F THE
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANN :'NG DFPARTMENT
Dore December 6 119 79
To Rosanne Montayue
From_ _ _ _ Marcia Raines
Subject ZE-34-71
Attached is the Change of Conditions request for Safeco as we discussed by phone
We have received a request from Gerald A Wi,nkler, of Walker, McGough, Foltz and
Lyerla to be notified of any meetings rEgarding this request. Mr Winl.ler is
acting as agent 1=or Safeco and is familtar with this project . His address is
North 120 Wall Street, Spokane 99210.
In addition, I believe there is a parochial school located south of this s,ite
I am sure they will be interested in this request I will call them befare the
Boa rd meets, but if you schedule a hearing, please notify them
Attachment
MMR cmw
4
OFFiCE OF TbE
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT
Date December 6 119 79
To board of County Commissioners
From Ma rc i a M.__Ra i nes
Subiect A ReQuest to Delete Condition #5 from Board of County Commissioners' Resolution
No 74-660 File ZE-34-71. '
File ZE-34-71, a request for zone reclassification from Agricultural to Commercial
for purposes of constructing a shopping center, was reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission on April 30, 1971. Approximately 3 112 years later, the zone
reclassification was reviewed and finalized by the Board of County Commissioners.
At the time of finalization of the zone, the proposed use was changed from a
shopping center to an office building.
Following Board of County Commissioners' approval of the zone reclassification, a
Safeco Insurance Company office building was constructed on the southwest corner
of Sprague and Adams.
Fencing was a part of the original staff recommendation to the Planning Commission
regarding the shopping center proposal, in order to provide a barrier to school
property located south of this site The fence was never constructed. In
conjunction with submitting building permit application for expansion of the office
facility, Safeco Insurance Company is requesting that Condition #5 af Board of
County Commissioners' Resolution No 74-660 be deleted.
MMR.cmw
SAFEC13 Mao~
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANIES MAILING ADORESS P O BOX 2726 TA
SPOKANE DIVISION SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99220
14610 E SPRAGUE TELEPHONE (509) 928 6800
SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99216
November 29, 1979 cc: R.O. Corporate R,eal Eetgte (T-13)
Hi1.azy Meyerle
~ Spolcsne Caunty Pla,nning Dept.
N. 721 Jeffersoa
Spokane Board of County Commissioners 3pokaae, I4A 99201
County Commissioners Office
W 1116 Broadway
Spokane, WA 99201
Gentlemen
We would like to call your attention to a matter concerning the
zoning criteria around the SAFECO office complex which is located
at E. 14610 Sprague Avenue. As you know, this is a multimillion
dollar office complex contrlbuting economically as well as aesthetic-
ally to the surrounding environment. To obtain the zoning permit
for this office, we were required to expend considerable funds for
the overall improvement of the immediate area around this property
However, recent zoning standards have evidently been eased as to the
requirements for signs of improvement of the area for other properties
in our locale. Specifically, we are concerned that the property
across Sprague Avenue from our property was zoned to permit storage
and operation of U-Haul trailers/trucks.
We have no concern about the reliability or national reputation of
this firm and we know that they will be good neighbors. Our complaint
is not against the U-Haul Truck Rentals Company but against the County
Zoning Commission which approved this change. The cornpatibility of
such operations immediately adjacent to a large office complex which
we designed to enhance the beauty of the area through professional
landscaping, limited use of business signs and etc was just not
justif iable. We feel that allowing the zoning of that property for
storage of trailers and truclcs detracts from the value of the SAFECO
property and does nothing to enhance the beauty or potential value of
adjacent properties.
Therefore, we strongly urge that the County Planning Commission be
directed to more closely screen any future applications for building
or occupational use changes on property in this area to prevent further de-
terioration of our facility and the other similar properties. We Crust
that we may continue in our fine working relationship with the Spokane
County governing bodies. wlt~
Sincerely yours, M'N E
ECEIM
3 197 y
wesley, .it. Malcolm ~ ~
nivision l~ianager ~ ~
SPOKA~iE COU T~EN~
` SAFECO INSU~#ANCE COMPANY QF AMEFi1CA P~NNING DEPAR
SAFECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
FIRST NATIpNAL INBURANCE COMPANV pF AMERICA
SAFECO NA710NAL INSURANCE COMPANY
~
A
~
~ t
6POKAN$ COIINTY PLANNINa COmiMI6SYON
, ,~9-, ~,Q~`f t
~ ~ tti _ PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 871 JEFFERSON STtiEET
PFIONE 456-2274
'~~$:L~-i, y,~ ~i.lIUU l~~ ~~abt ^ , ~ " ~,,,,,....rr•~" SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 89201
i~' s+.•,5yM~i .r~'S _w I~. i Vt
SPOKANE COUHTY COURT NOUSE
May 6, 1975 MEMORANDUM
TO: BILL J. FERGEN
FROM: jOHN D. KONEN, Zoning Administrator
SUBjECT: Environmental Assessment - Safeco Insurance Company Division Office
We have reviLewed the Environmental Assessment for the Safeco Insurance Company
Division Office on the E 14500 block of Sprague Avenue prepared by Haworth and
Anderson, Inc. and are of the opinion that the report accurately portrays the
environmental impacts and considerations of the project. We are of the opinion
that an Envsronmental Impact Statement is not required in conjunction wlth the
release of building permits for the division office facility.
The applicants are submitting specialized plans of the project in accordance
with the resolution by the Board of County Commissioners for our staff evaluation.
A bond has also been submitted to assure completion of the proposed landscaping.
We will try to review the submittals as expeclitiously as possible so that you can
release the building permits.
Sincerely,
~JV
jOHN D. KONEN
:vls
-
~
~ ~f .Gs', ~ CC~/~~~►
~
~ ~ ~i ~ t ` ~
. ~
i~ 70~~y
l
~ ~ - _ _
- . . - ' 't
T _ -
1
NOo &7Y^
BEF'ORE THE BQARD,OF COUNTY CaNMSSIONERS OF SPOKANE COjINTY, WASHMaTON
zE-34-n
IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONIlVG MAP )
FROM AGRICUL'I'URAL TO COMMCIAL ON PROPERTY )
LOCATID IN THE NE 1/1F OF THE NW 1A OF ) RESOIUTION
}
SECTION 239 TOWN3HIP 25 N., RANGE 449
E.WoMo, 3POKANE COUNTY, WASHIlNCTON )
The above-entitled matter comxng on regularly for hearing before the Board
of County Coam4ieeionera of Spokane County, Washington, on thie day, and it
appearing to the Board tb.at the Spokarie Covnty Planning Commseaion haa given
due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time pro-
vided by law; that eaid Plaruiing Commieaion hae held a public hearing as
required; and that the es►Zd Planning Commiseion oonoure in the plaa to zone
the following deecribed property aes
CONMERCIAL g
That portion of the NE 1A of the NW 1/4 of Section 23o Townehip 25 Ne ,
Range 44, E.W.M. lyirig north of the Chioago, Milwaukee, 3to Paul, aad Paaifie
RaZlroad, except the Weet 910 feete
THE BOARDI, having heard the testimony of the Applicant and the Spokane
County Plaaning Commisaion, aad having reviewed the Envirorunental Asaesament
submitted in conjunetion therewith, conclwdes that this action Ze a major
aation, but that zt doea not slgnificantly affeot the quality of the envivon-
ment and that no environmental impaet statement 1e necessary.
NOWo THEREFORE, BE'IT RESOLVED, that the above-deacribed property be, and the
eame hereby ss tzoned vader the alassifieation of CONMCIAL as defined in
the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted Auguat 25v 1953, ae amendedo
AND FURTMM HE IT RESOLVED that any development on the above-desoribed
property shall be eubJect to the Pollowing conditionea
lo Roadway improvements for the project area ahall be bonded with
the 3pokane County Eagineer'e Offiee prZOr to release of building
per9m9.te (the project area inclu,des tlaat portion of the NE 1/4 of
the NW 1/4 of Section 23, Townahip 25 No, Range 44, E.W.M, lying
north of the Chicago, Mi-lwaudee, Sto Paul, and PaciPic Railroado)
2e The Director of Plenning aha.ll approve a speoific landecape
plan and appropriate bond for aecomplishment of landacapzng require-
mente in connection with ar~y building permit issued within the project
area (suoh plan shall indicate approprfate treatanent along Sprague
Aveaue)o
3e The Director of PlannZng shall approve a specific exterior ~
lighting plan for the project area prior to inatallation of such i,
lightinge `(Such plan ehall attempt to confine zllumination to '
the project area with full coneideratfon to adjoining residential
properties). ~
I
4. The project area may have one (1) free-stariciing center identl-
Pioation aign not exeeeciz.ng one hundred and fifty (150) equare feet
in area arid 35 feet in heighto Pernanent exterior aigne for ,
zndividual eetabllahmente shall, when exceeding forty (40) equare '
feet in area, be placed flat,against the building facing a etreet, ~
~
~
f l - i
~
(
aa T ~e- a r(r '^rC-. -w.- ^ _ .-^-1^M't"~ S~14 ~ ~ y-ey~.. .r...+s2^+r -'L q ••-i .r. «
1 ,
~
.
i
BOARD OF CORJI~'!'Y CONMI3SIONERS PAGE,TWO Zr~34-71
~
r
i -
the aaceaeory parking area or pedeatrian mall. All eigne may be ,
illuminated provided that they shall not be animated nor flashingo
5o Inatallat,ion by the applicant of a aecurity fenoe to be approved by the Director of Plannirig between Second Avenue and the Milwaukee
Road trackea
~
PA9SID BY THE BOARD th3.e 19th dsy of September, 1974o
BOARD OF COUNl'Y CONDKIS3IONERS
OF SPOKANE COUN'I'Y, WASMOI'ON
r
` ~ .
i
o
ATTFST:
VFMOa _ OH.AND
'
C1 _ the d
f
,
.
,
This za to certif'y that thia is a true ,
and correct copy of Reaolution Nos 74-660 I
paeeed Boa thie 19th day of
sepVeambe , 19?4e , l
gy s
L~~ r . . . . ,
,
~
I hereby certify that I have posted the above ohangea ~
and revieions on the Zoning Map in the Building Codes
Department, and,do fLirther certify that the zone
claseification ehange ie the same aa deecribed
above and ehowm on the,attaohed mapo
SI(NIDs
DATme . .q,. 2.( 'O,Lz~
. . . . . ► '
~
~w
~
F
~
r ~
1 -
(
~ -
S7 `i
1 1
(S
1 ~
1 '
,
d
~ E
t
f
- / f.s~' ~ ~.l' • .
, ~ c.~fi ~ l'~ r~ f t~ t ~ ~ r= t., ~ U' •
r~-"-ECo
~ E
_ - - - - - - - _ - _ _ - - - _ ~
f
Y
,
7-P~ C
_S ~.L6 U/l (T I E D L-r.,cq 7 ED
~
AVc-e-JC-)C- TS U_
~
I tA T~A
~
~
or4s_ p-\10__
_ _I rn P A C.r~~ TA L. ~?C 1 S l I ~1`~► ~
J~
-rv^1 C)i c_ 12-0~C)~
12a~ r/'1
,
0 y L C/9_i !
~
;
i 3A I nll COA)DI 776
_ _ ~ _ _ ~ ~ _t_~ _ _ I ~J _ i ~ _ _Q~ l~! r✓~ C~_ _ ~_'`!'E ~'}f~~ , ~
C, prl C71
Po _ T-H-
- zc~!
CC-~72
c {a / 7
____1
- ~ - - ~ ~t~
~
P-G Vi (~IAf TN e 0 & ( [~.l ~~..~C CyLl K_a~ &C
V1_VL1 C 1"1 ~A 6a
~
DUAI
_ ~ - ~ ~,.J ~`.~-A ►`-S j_ ~ ~ t ~ L
~
D l NC LO_D C _ ~5t _D C(..tj(-~ r ~ - - -
_E
- - - - _ - I
~
U -r _7-,)eC- ~~'~i •~,f~
- - - - - - -
~ ~ ~ - ~
r
J - - - -
D C C•~-~ j`' U '3
14
i
~ ~ 1 ~ t ~ t \ 1♦~ ~ y
2-,oF~
~
~:/~1_CA < _
r'~ f Y~ _ _11!nraC-iDl_~
C\ 51-TC 4,t/.~ /iV
~
~
~1'= ir
70-1 ~G.Ir_.~....+:.1.-xj.--1 .-_,A ~3-.' v ~V~~~1 L
A-~-R'S
7/- i 7-l
;
FL A f- J /n/ A- 9 "AP2;!t~ISr~~ _
--.j s~~.. ± .~.i n~c..v ~ c ~~.A: ~~a~ ~ ~a 1~s~ - _L,~~ /_d?•~~~
,
► 1'v► ~ tif
_ T
- ~
+J G L- L o_~--t .~="L Ly T'-~~?T U~O
;
_ O_e,1~
_--74=C: ,el_~..~~ ~l_Lr t~r~J __~?o I ~ t o o`/ _ _
, - -
i
4L~!
~ -
7 %-/C~
__--1 V ~ ~-t I'-j ;~-r~ ~L470
_ _ _ _ _ i ~~-k c~ ~.i t~_C 1~1-~~~~~. ~ ~~f ~ r~ ~~t L 1 ~ _
l
C=--~~'
~
,
/_/_2'i
f
,
t
rtf ~1 ~ ~ fY' J✓ j\~~ ` //~^r ~ v /r J' ~ ~ r r ~ ~
_ }~~J ~~~LJ~1~~J ~ ' _ _F~^..~•_ • ~ ~~~~J i/ ~ ~f ~ ~`t~ ~ ~ - ~~r+~~fr L~J/ r-_~-~_
~ , ~ _ ~+~~J 4~--~-~ ! ~ i~~7 _ ~ 1 1 _ _ l~ ~ ~-4.~1 ~ ~ 1 ~ L~.. _ ~ 4 - - - - - - - - - ^ -
~
~
~
- - - - - - ` j~l ~ ~rj C~ ~ ~ ~ _ , , ► t"' r^
r-~- t..r~~ _ ~ ~ - < < ~ ~ ~ ~ t'F= s~rr✓1 j'{/,~t/ t...._~...~.._.
~
- - - - - t✓ 1 - - 3
' - - - - ° - ° - - - - - - - - - - r ~.J / t
~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~t_ f ~ ~ l _
~
,r ZONE CHANGES POSTED ON Z, NG MAPS
APPlication No. 34 - 7 , Res. No. -s°G~ Res. Date qjIjj7q
~
--L-~--
From: ~ I To: c
Posted By:_ ~ c~ 1 S Date Posted ct] 2(0 ~ 74
Acre s: ~ Se c. 23 Two. Z.5 Range ~
EAST
tooo~ (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
_
poe~ (Wall Map) Front Office Scale• 1" - 1000'
IoOooo~ (Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 4 00'
(File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000'
(File Map) Metro 411 (Director's Office) Scale • 1' - 2 000'
(File Map) County - Front Office Scale• 1" - 1 mile
(File Map) County (Map Room) Scale• 1" - 2 miles
q lul
3 I s (Score Card) Middle Office
~►.A°,,.,~' sp`°'.,,-A- zV-..--f M*J- . S~Ft I~. I" ~ 20D
V ?
~
SOUTH EAST
(Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale 1" - 1000'
(VVall Map) Front _)ff-,ce Scale 1000'
(V1r 311 Map) Middle Jffice Scale 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) 'rront Office Scale: 1 " - 400'
(F,1P Map) Tracino 434 (Sot "h East Zoning Maps) Scale 1000"
(Fiie Map) Metre 4,11 (Da.rectors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000'
(F.le Map) Countv-Front Office Scale: I" - 1 mile
_ (File Map) CountS (Map Room) Scale 1" - 2 miles
(Score Cards) Middle Jffice
r
~
a
r
ME MORANDU M
September 18, 1974
TO. Board of County Commissioners
FROM: John D. Konen, Zoning Administrator
SUBjECT• Environmental Assessment - Safeco Regional Headquarters Bldg.
ZE-34-71
Our office has conducted an environmental assessment of an office building proposal
for Safeco Insurance Company of America in conjunction with the finalization of
ZE-34-71, Agncultural to Commercial, Sherwood and Roberts. The site is situated
on the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue on a parcel of land legally described
as follows
That portion of the NE 4 of the NW 4 of Section 23, Township 25 N.,
Range 44, E.W. M. , Spokane County, Washington described as follows
Beginmng at a point which i s 2 0' W and 5 0' S of the N 1/4 corner of
said Section 23, thence S 0°06'36 "W, along the W line of Adams Road,
601.44' to the N nght of way line of C. M., St. P & P. Railroad,
thence S89°58'33"W, along said right of way, 393.93', thence
N0°08'24"E, 60.00', thence N89°5833"W, 466.07', thence N0006136"E,
561.811 to the S line of Sprague Avenue, thence E, along said S lzne,
845.00', thence S36047'58"E 24.98' to the point of beginning.
In accordance with the Planning Commission hearing of April 30, 1971, that portion
of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 23 lying N of the Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul and Pacific Railway except the W 910 feet was approved for Commercial
Zoning subject to seven conditions applicable to the entire ownership which includes
the 910' to the west (which is currently zoned Commercial and Local Business). A
shopping center was proposed for the 1300' x 610' site at the Apnl 30, 1971 heanng.
Conditions were imposed by the Commission relating to the dedication and improve-
ment of Second Avenue through the project area, widena.ng and improvement of Adams
Road, and dedication and improvement of a new north-south street. In addition, the
Commission required submittal of a landscape and lighting plan, restncted signs,
and re quired a security fence along the railroad right of way.
The shopping center proposal has been essentially altered by the proposal of Safeco
Insurance Company of America to construct a regional headquarters office building
within an 860' X 600' site situated on the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Adams Road. The staff has reviewed the submitted plans and has recommended certain
adjustments to accommodate the office project and to assure compaf.ibility with adjoin-
ing uses. These adjustments include sidewalks along Sprague Avenue and a wider landscape
strip between Sprague Avenue and the Phase III parking area.
-1-
.
In our opinion, the office proposal will have less potenttal impact on surrounding
properties than the previously proposed shopping center. The 10.9 acre site
would accommodate a 73,700 square foot building with 205 parking stalls at the
completion of Phase I culminating with a 113, 680 square foot building and 409
parking stall s at the completion of Phase 3. The we st 2 3 0' of the site would be re -
served for future development. The building would not exceed three stories in
height. The structure would be srtuated in the northeast corner of the ownership
set back approximately 5 0' from the Sprague Avenue and 5 0' from Adams Road, Are as
to the south and we st would be utilized for parking. The building would be de signed
as a single purpose office to accommodate Safeco's functional requirements. Although
a final architectural design has not been selected for the building, inspection of
photographs of similar division offices reveals generous landscaping, subtle signing
and lighting, and aesthetic architecture suited to suburban locations.
In accordance with the Planning Commission recommendation, a landscape plan will
be required for the project. Prelimznary submittals indicate generous landscape
allowance s around the building and extending to Sprague Avenue and Adams Road.
Additional landscape screening is anticipated to effectively screen the parking lots
from Sprague Avenue, Adams Road, and Second Avenue. A sprinkler system will
serve the landscaped areas.
In accordance with further Planning Commission recommendations, the project will
have low profile llghting in parking areas. Signing will be complimentary to the
building and oriented toward Sprague Avenue. The sign, including rts base, will be
about 14' x 8' in size or smaller with a total height between 8' and 14' and double
face plexiglass with modest intensity.
A package treatment plant will be situated in the south central portion of the site
for sewage disposal. Landscaping and fencing will be employed to reduce the visual
impact of the facila.ty. Storm water generated on the site will be handled by dry wells.
The site can be seYVed by established utilities such as water, electricity, gas,
telephone and refuse collecta.on.
The Safeco office building will initially employ 213 people. Within ten years, the
facility will be employing 458 people. The firm has selected the site because of
the large residenta.al labor supply in the immediate residential areas. Over half of
the employees will be women. The operation consists primanly of processing and
reviewing insurance policies, bonds, claims, etc. Most of the business is forwarded
and received by U S. mail. No large scale deliveries are anticipated other than
office supplie s, stationery, insurance forms, manuals, etc.
Approximately 205 car parking spaces wi].1 be provided dunng the Phase I operation.
If more than 250 car parking spaces are anticipated, the firm would be obliged to
apply for a complex source review through the Spokane County Air Pollution authority.
Because the site is located near the labor market, it is anticipated that the facility
wiil not appreciably contnbute to air pollution in the Spokane Metropolztan area and
will conserve energy by reducing transportation demands within the Metropolitan area.
-2-
Ad
The required rights of vuay and roadway improvements will prov2de for better traffic
flow in the area and will alleviate traffic and safety impacts on adjoining roadway.
E mployee s will arrxve at work from 7 00 to 8• 00 A. M, and will le ave at 4 30 P. M.
School hours in the area range from 8 30 A M. to 3 30 P. M Road sy.4tems in the im-
mediate area are deszgned beyond present capacity and can accommodate the additional
traffic movements. The Spokane County Engineer's offzce has recommended that
sidewa].ks be incarporated into the project, especially along Sprague Avenue to Ymprove
pedestrian convenience and safety. As vther properties in the area develop, pedestrian
activity wi].1 increase. The requested improvements should be adequate to handle
any future xncreases in pedestrian and auto traffic resulting from the expansions of
the Safeco office project in future years.
The site is situated within the urbanxzed portion of the Spokane Valley. Cultivation
and resrdential development during the last 50 years have changed the natural eharac-
teristxcs of the area. The property is part of the gently undulating Gam.son Gravel
fvrmation af the 5pokane Va1Tey. The property gentiey slopes from Sprague Avenue
down to the Milwaukee Road tracks. No extensive excavation or topographic disturb-
ance is anticipated. The proposal will not apprecraloly affect gealogy or topographic
conditions.
In review, landscaping and other mitzgatxng measures will adequately buffer the
facility from residential developments to -the north of Sprague Avenue and south of
the Milwaukee Road tracks. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the site is appro-
priate for comrrperczal and office develapment, and the surrounding ].and uses reflect
the implementation of the plan. Mitigating measures have also been taken to assure
adequate and safe vehrcular and ped.estrian movement. The facility will haVe na apprec-
iable effect on existing topography, geology, or aquat.ic condztions,
Although the biolvgical and botanical characteristics af the site have been altered by =
urbanization, generaus landscaping will temper the imgact of the buildrng and assoc-
iated parking area. Ai.r poll.utian Ievels will be reviewed when the car parking area
is proposed to exceed 250 spaces. We, therefore, conclude that proper mitigating
measures and conslderations have been reviewed and that an environmental impact
statement for the project is not required far the zone change request.
ADDITIONAL C+OMMENT• °
Supplementai infvrmation regarding the operatlvn of the facilifiy, employee considera-
tions, cost of the project, and economic effect are contaa.ned in a 16 page report
with exhibits pravided by the Safeco Insurance Company and Paul A. Clausen,
attvrney for Safeco,
-3-
RIGI.T uF 'WAY DEED ~~cC r.'0.J d I".GE r~~►.r~d~
t r
3
f
~
« IN TIE INUTTEIt of the ADA~MS R(7AD No. 1201
`\OW 4I1, b#Ew BY THESE PRESEN"TS, That KENNETH D. PEARSQN
and ELBIR= PEARS0-N
, his wife, of the Cotimty of Spok-ane,
in the StMte ol' Washuigton, xn consxderation of the benzfats and other valuable consideratzons, and,
thP sLn, of Q3A n n,[iof1 iJollars, paud ~hem by the County of Spolmne,
*he receipt ti}hereof is hereby aclulawlecgged, have ;ranted, bargalned, sold and cvnveyed, and by these
presents da grant, bargain, sell and convey unto sa.id Spokane Coim.ty, the followug described garcel
ox" ].and, situated in Spolanne Cowity, xn the State of bashington, t,o--wat:
' '______....,_ftF
--r...~.0 ....__..'SZtI~^(Tl~~l~~v~i-~~."~" ___l a... -smmd
-___________________________~,o'a'rI'~~
---,!~,vt t.
` _
`~-i zp, sarv~ ~d,-z 2crr 'd'---------------
.
LM!':%t------ - -=~j ~-s~YO,'n-~r-t~-~~~l.-rr~~es-~r,..~--a--~~►e--rtrfr3er~ ~3~--t~r*~#"-~n-~.r~2
~
, Ufl-tim--Sp _ y E7g raceT-,-c,re,That nortion of the Tiortheast
quar4er of the Northdest Quarter caf Section 23, Tmrnship 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.
' Spa=ca~rie Count'y, Washington, described as follows:
Beg3.nnzn; at the North Quarter carner of Section 23, Tvwnship 25 North, Rar_ge 44 EsW.M.r
est 30.00 i eet to a point, thenc~: South 0°
r1 06' 30" W-st, 36.68 feet tv the
Truz Point of Beginnug# thence Svut-h 36° 47° 5$" East, 16.66 feet to apoint, th¢nc-
5ou;h O° Q6' 3o'r tiest, 6o1.44 f€:et -co a point, thence 5fluth $90 581 33e1 West, 393•93
-r to a point, thence North 0' 487 24" East, 60.00 fzet to a posnt, thenc2 North
c5qo S$' 33" East. 363,93 feez to a-ooint, tnence North 45a Cfl' East, 28.29 feet to
3 point, theace Nor4h o° O6v 3E" E,ast, 5340$0 feet to the True Point of Beginn.ing4
County Engineer
(;eti 4k(il.'►IOlT$,3 .~r A
geq. Caurthouse xxx
of Section 23 , TownsYalp 25 hjorth, Ran;e 44 , E.IV.;!!.
TYl HAVE k\-D TO HOLD the same, unto the sasd Spok-ane County for the purposes of a pa,blxc road
forzver.
.
In -atness }vhereof k-+/ have herea.mto set hand and seal this
de-i of 19 SE.aI.)
r r
(m1L)
(NC1'IE Zf mar: ied. must be signeu by bath busband mnd wzfe.)
j Form oSSr'l ~ y 1 f" 1
j zLw -4- 71
~ ii I l,~~~ 1 U1' 1~' A x li r.~~ YA[it
't 174- 092 f) 023~
~ - .
~
F` THE iUTTER of the SM0ND AMNEE tio• 18L;C-3
LtiC►ty ALL tilEN BY TI[ESE PP.CSEATS, That Cprald L. Haggood, Attoxn2y-i.n.-fact
ntid ,,'~~~-*+=e, of thee CoLutty of Spokane,
In tlip Stute of ti'lashington, Yn consideration of the benefits and other valtiable consiclarltions, -nd
tl:t, si ini of One and no/I.00............ Doll ars, paid them by the Coun ty of Spok-ane,
i the receipt ti-hercof is herebv acimos.leclgred, have grmnted, b<<rgainzd, sold and conveyecl, and by these
przsent.s do grant, barga.in, se21 cind convey unto said Spoi.ane County, the folloti%ino described parcel
of land, situatecl in Spokane Coura~~ , in the St1te of ~Vashington, to-wit:
4--Stz'1T►_af 1:►nrl fPP~ tr.~A1to nn s1 - vrth 1ine-&f s&3fl
. „ -vitfiirr-Sasd
~ -foot strig,.-as-s
i 6e , ~ c t, on --frte
~ ~7 CLC,.,
a [!i'f'l['~e n f ~"~'?,7 r !C! res.5.
Y
f.;nat ro-rtion c~f the 1LrnrtheaSt, Guarter (l1p, 14) of the NorthTvest fJuarter (K.1 lIL•)
o`' Secti-on 23, To,,,nsh-!o 25 1Tor`vh, Ranae L~,. E,U.M.. Sookane Comzty, Washin~~ton,
.
described as fo3loTtrs: Be-innzne at the Noeuh Ouarter corn.-r of said Szction 23~ thency
-3►as, adistan:e of 1123e60 feet; ther_ce South 0 08124" West, a dist'sance of 621.99
r"e--'V- to the ril-rue Poir_t of He ;inni. ; thence Vorth 89 58133" yast, a dista.nce of
~ k0 0 z"ee t~ thence TTorth 0 QS T 21~" Fast, a d3stance o.i 60.00 feet ; thenc~ South
80 SA-I-a"" * tPst. _ a ct, zt anrp nf 150.00 'iP?_t T i:'hParQ Smith 0a 124-'~ Ylest a ci~~~mP of
60.00 feet to the True Point of Hepainn=. .
: ~LIZU Oei H-CO$OED
' H.QUEST 0F, CountY Enginezr
~_.'tA 4 7.. ,
a ciLT tU `3 !5 rri e~
i/GT'f Qit Yi Grf-14}40►dUqtYr,t~
c~nK • .
ilhriJf
t •-n y
Rgq. COUrth4USe
n.L.ti
of Section 23 , Tounship 25 NOI Lh~ F•ange 4+ , E.W.1i.
TO Et-WE kN'D TO HOLD the same. tmto the said Spokane County for the purposes of a pubiic road
f UrevPr.
Tn ;itness «hereof 1J2 have hereLmto set aur hand S and sea7. S this r 7
ua~ a E i' 17 19 ,
~ ~:^,c.:G~ ► ~J j ~
~SS F ~D,Jr
ILE..A.~T~. K ti-1COD, RICH~ R. STAC~Y, COIiTtE M. STA6 6i, ~MOORE, JOY K;:COI y,,_.
K T~~D~L REUGH y Mt~RY A1~TiV REUGH, ~.L{+~ItD W, KIE~i ~,JR , L,~' t~~&I3R TZ M
Jii-'- "Ii narried, must be sz;ned by both hu5band and ~vife
ca- o5SQ
~ r
Zr-31,-71
r~
~ a' IGHT Ot l1 Aac DEED R ~ E L 2i3 d mr 22B
~ •
Vs THE 1LlTTER of the AD0.tiIS RO4D ~,to. 1201
~H 1V-iv AU lMN BI TEiCSE PRE13EtiT5, That FR~'.•S T H MATEHEWS +
and ~RIS Rk=Z , hxs wife, of the CoLm ty of Spokanz,
in the State of ZYashington, zn consicterata.an of the benpfits and other valuable consxdPratzons, and
tt-ie swu of ~~P-rd-w /Z f1Cl Dollars, paxd thom by thP Coumty of S'pokane,
the receipt tithereoF is hereby aclmo4dlecTged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these
. presents do grant, bargain, sell qand convey t.mto said Spokane Count3-, the follvs4ing descrzbeci parcel
of xand, situated in Spol.ane County, in the State of WaShingtvn, to-wit'
t.r.rgr-Uf--1arrd - feu t.ride -ul I slrle-+erfi-Mci-Pr,zrM1-ke-1-rYtk
t----------------------------roa-7t
_ - ........_14C70t~5rt.?Zgj ci5'St[L VEY*~C~j ?2~~-,..-...------------------_.-______r.-_-~.........~~..~~._
-f•t~r-t~~-~bor~-Ht~trnrr~ . ,--as~:~~-z:rrthe~y3.~1-rrec~.~-~.r~-v~-~ke-~f'~'~~ra,L- ~►~~~--~~i~r~-en-~.r~
rn-t~-~f'f=ce--cr;'-th~-~o~n*r-2at~*ctv~ne•ei-,-ac~r-~.nek-~^-ra~s T`nat -portion of the Northeast .
. Quarter of thz Northwest Quarter o'L Sectzon 23, Toons,'nip 25 Plorth, Range 44 E.W.M.
Srso?eane County, Washington, described as £ollows:
Eaczanln, at the North Q.zarter carner of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.tf.M,
th'rce Wesc 30.00 feet to a po2nt, thence Sauth 00 0E' 36" tlest, 36.E8 feet 4o the
Torue Poznt of Begi.xnnzng; trence South 36° 47' S$" East, 16.EE feet to a po1nt, thenz-a
~out.h 0° 06' 30" Elest, 641.4+ feet to a poin't, theace South $9° 58' 33" '.lest, 393.93
::~-et to a point, thence North U0 o$' 24" East, EQ.a0 feet to a point, thence North
0-00 58' 3?'~ ~ast. ~+~3.97 fee4 to a naint,, thence ~~artn ~+5~ 00' East, 28.29 feet -to
a point, thence North 0° 06l 36" East, 534.30 feet to the true toint of Bagin..~ing.
: IL.U t3 -11% Ktl.UKUtU
P,: C~UEST QF nounzy-
_Engin°er
_ Qt1 ~?~t
V~.r L.'kJ ; 15 1 t-! i
YtRM0M 11 04LANt?.dU01i a? .
N71KAi-!!C t'RI41?TY.k1tS4
S c
Gc°UTY
ReQ. cOU]CthQUSE' Xxx
of Section P-3 , Townshxp 25 \orth, Range 44 , E.jti'.11.
Tt) IIAti'k. tLND TO HOID the same, unto the sai.d SPokane County for the purposes of a publ ic rvad
for eti e: .
Tn uit;iess "hereof `Fv }ia% P hPreLuito sPt Qur liana s ancl seal~ t}iis A ~
19 ~ .
da-% of / 7r~ ~
(SEu..)
F
~ i•' _ . ~r"~ i ~ ~ t f ~7~.'.:~.~
(1tyi'E If married. must be sagned by bcrth httsband and alfe }
~ ro -r► 55SP ~ ~ ~
~
1
' 7409200229
1
RIGHT Or WAY DEED ~0d PACE
I1`I THE 12ATTE11; of the ADANIS ROAD No 1201
KN0tJ ALL MEN BY 'I'HESE PkESENTS, That GER.AI,D L. HAGOOD,
Zncla.viclually and as Attorney-in-fact of ROSS F WOOU, Jr and
ILEANA K WOOD, husband and wife, RICHAIZD R STACEY and COZdNIE
M STACEY, husband and wife, JOEL A MOORE and JOY K MOOP,E,
husband and wife, K 14ENDELL REUGH and MARY ANN REUGH, husband
and c,rife, EDVIARD W KIEl7LE, Jr and ByTTY LOU KIENILE, husbanci
and w-F-►=e, and CERALDINE M HAGCCD, a married womart, of the
County of Spokane, in the State of Washington, in consicieiation
c,F the benefits and other valuable considerations, and the suLa
of UNE and no/100 ($1 00) DOLLARS, paid by the County of Spokane,
the receipt whereo.E is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained,
sold and conveyecl, and by these presents do grant, bargainT sell
ancl convey unto said Spokane County, the following described par-
cel o.E land, situ4ted in Spokane County, in the State of Washing-
ton, to-wit
That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North,
P.ange 44 i W M Spokane County, Washington, clescribed
as follows
Beginning at the Rorth Quarter corner of Section 23,
Township 25 North, P.ange 44 E.W M thence Wes t 30 00
feet to a point, thence Soutn 0°06'36" West, 36 68
teet to the True point of Beginning, thence South
36°47'S3"East, 16 66 Feet to a point, thence 'South
0°06' 36" West, COl 44 feet to a poj_nt, therc~ Sauth
.
89°53'33" West, 393 93 feet to a point, thence North
0°08' 24"East, 60 00 feet to a point, thence ldorth
$9°58'33" East, 363 93 Feet to a point, thence North
45°00'East, 28 29 reet to apoint, thence North 0"06'36"
East, 534 80 feet to tre True Point of Beginning,
of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 E C,1 Pl
TO IIAVE AND TO HOLD tlle same, unto i:he sa.Ld Spokane County
for the purposes of a public road forever.
IW WITNESS WHFREOF I have hereunto set my hand and seal
thl5 6th day of Septen'uer , 1974.
4
~ • ~ J
GER.ALD L HAGOOD, Individually
RUSS r IJOOD, Jr , and Ir'L"rA K WUUD,
RICHARD R STACEY and CONr3IF M STACEY,
JOEL A MOOFtE and JOY K MOURE,
K j,F?IENDELL I'tiUGH and 2-1ARY ANN REUGH,
FILE~ OR R,CORDEO EDWARD W KIEr~I,E, Jr and bETT~.' LOU I:III~~LI
and GERALDIN-E PI HAGOOD, by Gerald L
Rt, Qvrc T pr CauntY Engfneer
Hag4od _as their attorney in fact
~
r/• f,
1'q
GERALD L HACUOD, Attorney in Fact
3_.f.Ll,A'.'
C~,1'L1 Y►ri
ReQ • CQlirthouse
xx;c
CLAUSEN & GEMMILL
701 - 702 FIDELITY SLDG
SPOKANE. WASHiNGTON 99201
~
v i
\
s
~
~ ►
, l
~2 F .
~ ~
YL. 207 PACE 221
STATE OF T.rIASHING'rON )
) ss
County of Spokane )
On this 6th day of September , 1974, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
duly cormnissioned and sworn, personally appeared GERALD L. HAG04D
to rie known to be tle individual described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument for himself and as attorney in fact of
ROSS F. WOOD, JR and ILEANA K WOOD, RICHARD R STACEY and CONNIE M.
STACEY, JOEL A MO.ORE and JOY K MOORE, K WENDELL REUGH and
MARY ANN REUGH, EDWARD W KIEMLF, Jr. and BETTY LOU KIEMLE and
GERALDINE M. HAGOOD also therein described, and ackno`aledged to
me that he signed and sealed the same as his voluntary act and deed
and as the free and voluntary act and deed of the said ROSS F WOOD,Jr.
and ILEANA K. WOOD, RICHARD R STACEY and CONNIE M STACEY, JOEL A
MOOU and JOY K MOORF, K WENDELL REUGH and MARY ANN REUGH, EDWARD
W KiEMI.E, Jr and BETTY LOU KIEMLE, and GERALDINE M HAGOOD for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned andon oath stated that the potoers
of attorney authorizing the execution of this instrument have not
been revoked and that the said ROSS F woon, Jr and iLEANA K WOOD,
RICHARD R STACEY and CONNIE M STACEY, JOEL A MOORE and JOY K
MOORE, K WENDELL REUGH and MARY ANN REUGH, EDWARD W KIEMLE, Jr
and BETTY LOU KIEMLE and GERALDINE M. HAGOOD are now living
kTITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the daq
and year in this certificate above wlcitten
rJ l
• J
- ~ a ,v~✓ _ d " ~ .~i~-c~.GG-~..~
~t Notat I y Public in and for the State of
` bI \
Washington, Residing at Spokane
, 1~, } '
May 31, 1974
Mr. james S. Black
james S. Black & Co.
Peyton Buildinq
Spokane, Washington
Dear Mr. Black:
Enclosed lease find a copy of the Minutes approvinq Zone Chanqe, ZE-34-71,
at the south w~
corner of Sprague Avenue and Adams Road. As you will note,
(Conditions #1 throuqh #3) certain roadway dedications and improvements were called
for as part of the zone chanqe approval.
Although a ahopping center was the proposed use on this and an adioininq site
to the west, the conditions of approval do not stipulate that a shopping center mu,at be
built; conaequently, upon finalization of the zone change euch a use as you have
described (insurance office vomplex) miqht be constructed.
The zone change waa conditioned upon dedication of Second Avenue and a ~
connectinq north-south street; Second Avenue to extend the entire length of the
propoaed ahopping center some 1,300 feet ea stward of Adams Road. As I indicated
to you over the phone, I believe that the County has presently right of way deeds for
Second Avenue adjoining the previoualy zoned property as weli as the connecting
street fcom Second to 3praque. The Assesaor's maps, however, do not indicate this.
If further investigation reveals no valid deeds for Second Avenue and the connectinq
north-south street to Sprague, such dedications will have to be made to consummaEe
the zone change. Ae the insurance company presentation is different thati the
previously proposed shoppinq center site, the actual locatlon of the north-south road
may be shifted to avoid splitting of propertiea.
If you have any further questions about this matter, do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
CHARLES L. HUGGINS
Director of Planninq
Enclosure
CLH:cmw
. ^ o
~
. '
. .
~ .
r.
~
I
+ ~ ~ f
. ,
l ~ ik
P • ` ~ 1
V '
~ \14
w ~
. ~
• , ~ ~ ~
~ y
. ~ ~
~ f .
,
~
~
M ~
~ J-
~
To the Spokane Countg Cammissioners :
As residents and home owners in the vicinity of Adams an.d
Sprague where a large shopplng center is being planned, we urge
yQU to consider our petition,
We purchased our homes because this area was zoned
rESidential and agr3eklturald We wished to lfve away from
shopping centers and the always preaent traffic mnd noise and
lc+itering they produc e .
Sincethe Planning Commis s ion apparently has s een fit ta
ove°rrule the wishes of the majorf ty of property owners in the
neighbarhood and in an attempt to preserve the integrity of
our neighborhood, we ask for the fvllowing:
1} A].l business establishments ta be cloaed by 9PaM.
2} Security guarde to assure there are no gangs wander3ng
v ff vaward the neighborhaod or toward St. Mary ' s Church p
3) Construction of an overpass over Sprague. (Despite
the traffic light, there have been several pedestrian accidents,
two almost fatal, and many close ca13.s; 51 children cross at
this intersection going tv Stg Mary's School at 4th and Adams.)
4, Limited aecesa or single car aceess 4separate °t3.n"
and "out'° 3 to Adams Rd, from the C enter ,
S) Consideration f'or safety of the many horses and riders
Yn the areao
7) No laudspeaker promotions or carnivals.
No taverns, pool halls, or similar -reerea.tion estab3issh--
ffients on the premisese
g} The same regulations for outdoor burnin.g of waste
materials that must be observed by the rest of the neighborhaod*
a~h~re t'o
. rovi,ae ~d e.~ 9ps,ce$9
ec°~`'t, t~ p ma~-~op s
ur~'e tn ,om8°Vm''ez~s : hiOh Cheapen
to Pr°~`ee ~ n, 1 gprawl ~
Qvonsn-s p3a~' nt Co~
et~~-1 ~ a to p~e~e
.Oro,qide par
" ~.d ~-a a o dr es S.
.
~t~.e area. ,Ad
~ A~
.
.
~ /v
~ f
/
l-
VV/jl/i~jk-)
.
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
r 9 ~1► ~ ~ ~
4-7@~ ~
,
(.i~~ _ n _ , .
~
w`
.
7 Ta the Spokane County Commissioners:
.~~s residants and home owners in the vicinity of Adams and
Sprague iThere a large shopping center is bein,g planned, we urge
you to consider our petition,
tiie purchased our homes because this area wa9 zoned
residential an.d agriculturale We wiehed to live away from
aho?ping centers and the always present traffic and noise and
lo3tering they produce.
S3.nce the Planning Commias3.on apparently has seen fit to
overrule the wishea af the majority of property owners in the
neighborhood and in an attempt to preserve the integrity of
our neighborhood, we ask for the following:
1) All business establishments to be clos ed by 9P.Ni.
2) Security ~;aa,rds to assure there are no gangs wanaering
clof ,Loiaard the neighborhood or toward St. Mary's Church,
3) Construction oP an overpass over Spra,gue. (Despite
"Whe zraffic light, there have been several pedestrian accfdents,
ti-ro almost fatal, and many alose calls; 51 children cross at
'Whis intersection going to St, N~.amy's School at 4th and Adamso)
4) Limited aecess or single car access (separate "in"
and "outt1 ) to Adams Rdo from the Center.
5) - - h
a A ,
6) Conaideration for safety of the many horses and riders
in the areao
7) No loudspeaker promotions or ca,rn.ivals.
8) 1Vo taverna, pool halls,or similar reareatlon establissh-
ments on the premises.
9) The same regula'tions for outdoor burning of waste
materYala that muat be observed by the rest af the neighborhoodo
a~er8 t° an
r°v~-a$ ~a en
j, e C°~'t9 9,0
maIp
~n ~p s
ea~~n
tron6l` ur~° ct nQ~Qavm~~'S' l whi~h c'ri.
~3e 1~.~ to p~o~e erc~al spra~
_ a11 Zon~-~~ p rebent Gozna
~ 1 ofc engJ'qe a
Qve~ ~,s ~ ~~a l1
~~~'d,e par a~t~~ot
x~r ~ca
_ '
Ia s° L~~tYie are
V.A
W() j ~
~
r
a
CX
r 9 ~ /
( ~
*"~1..
r Y ~
P.004~
~
. •
a ~
~
. ~ ~
~OA
,
e
~ d+
~ ~ .
/
To the Spokane County Commissioners:
,Is residents and home owners in the vicinity of Adams and
SpraSue where a large shopping center is being planned, we urge
you to consider our petitiono
;ie purchased our homes because this area was zoned
residential and agriculturalo We wished to live away from
shonping centera and the always present traffic and noise and
loitering they produce.
Since the Planning Commission apparently has seen fit to
overrule the wishes of the majority of property owners in the
neighborhood and in an attempt to preserve the integrity of
our neighborhood, we ask for the following:
I) All busineas establishments to be closed by 9P.Ni.
2) Security guards to assure there are no gangs wandering
off toward the neighborhood or toward St. Mary's Church,
3) Construction of an overpass over Sprague. (Desp3.te
the traffic light, there have been several pedestrian accidents,
tt,ro almost fatal, and manp close calls; 51 children cross at
t'*Ohie intersection going to Sto Ma.ry's School a't 4th and Adams. )
4) Limited access or single car access (separate "in"
and "out") to Adams Rd, from the Center.
.
6) Consideration for safety of the many horses and ridera
in fi,Yie area e
7) No loudspeaker promotiona or carnivalso
8} No taverns9 pool halls,or similar recreation establissh-
ments on the premisee.
g) The same regula'tiona for outdoor burning of waste
materials that must be observed by the rest of the neighborhood.
!
~ •
°,Te strongly urge the Countg to provide and adhere to
ove-rall zonins plan to protect homeoVmers, maintain open sl
progide parks, and to prevent commercial aprawl which cheap%,
the area and is so estheticaZly offensiveo
,
,
Name Address
,
5: E-
Z '~1
~
',e, ~ ,
.
.
'000egzee
O )e" ~
r
a
D
.
` J 141~~~
I
~
d
To the 5pokane County Commissioners: ~
As residents and home owners in the vicinity of Adams and
Sprague where a large shopping center is being planned9 we urge
you to cons3der our petitiona ✓
lie purchas ed our homes b ec aus e this area was z oned
residential and a$riculturalo We wished to live away from
shopping centers and the always present traffic and noise and
loitering they produceo
Since the Planning Commiss3.on apparently has seen fit to
overrule the wishes of the majority of property owmers in the
neighborhood and in an att'emp't to pres erve the integrity of
our nelghborhood9 we ask for the following:
l) Al1 business esAtablishments to be closed by 9PoM.
2) Security guards to assure there are no Sangs wandering
off toward 'the neighborhood ~or toward St. Mary's Church,
3) Construction of an overpasa over Sprague. (Deapite
the traffic light, there have been several pedestrian accidentsa
uwo almost fatal9 and many close calls9 51 children cross at
this intersection going to Sto Mary's School at 4th and Adamso)
4) Limited access or single car accesa (separate "in°"
and 1dout") to Adams Rdo Prom the Centero
~
,
- - - o norttr-and-so-u-th
no
~
6) Consideration for safety of the many horses and riders
.
in the areao
7) No loudspeaker p"romotions or carnivalso
8) No taverns9 pool halls,or simflar recreation establissh-
Q ments on the premises.
g) The same regulations for outdoor burning of waste
materials that must be observed by the rest of 'the neighborhoodo ~
d ,~'ere ta ~n
~ ta pr°v~'de ~n opexi ~.,aeeg ~
e~ne c~~t~ , ma~nta~n
e stronSly uM eGt r;.ameovrrierS ,h~G~ ehea~Pep,s
W 1~ ,~o ~,ro v ~c~al S.Prawl v
overall o
~Pr event
E: o
a,~As 0 ax~d t 11l oTTensiv
~ro~i~e p 8o e
tY~ gth~t~.Ga
e arE~' ie Ad~regs,
. .
/ 4TO C(
~Z,
~
c ~
l 007
i-el
~ v
~ li' ~
Cl,() C
1 "
I, ~
vdzl- r
~
~
AP,
~
~ ~LP
. ,
,
ryw-j
1 19_...1"'r
P '
d '
~J
a
e
t }
~J V ~ ( y f f ~ l ~ I , Ej
` ~ ''J, ~ tl ♦
• ,a..J,'.. ~ ~ ~
/7-0~ 1
~
. ~
~ .
h
~
< < , .
z
.
d
P ~ r 1
C
~
,
To the Spokane County Comm.issioners:
As residents and home owners in the vicinity of Adams and
Sprague where a large shopp3.ng center is being planned, we urge
you to consider our netitiono
Twe purchased oum homes because this area was zoned
residential and agricultural. We wished to live away from
shopping centers and the always present traffic and noiae and
loitering they produce.
Since the Pla.nning Commission apparently has seen fit to
overrule the wishes of the majoritg of property owners in the
neighborhood and in an attempt to preserve the integrity of
our neighborhood, we ask for the following:
1) All business establishments to be closed by 9P.M.
2) Security guards to assure there are no gangs wandering
off toward the neighborhood or toward St. Mary's Chu-rcho
3) Constructivn of an overpass over Spragueo (Despite
tha traific light, there have been several pedestrian accidents9
two almost fatal, and many close calls9 51 children cross at
this intersection going to St. Maryts School at 4th and Adams.)
4) Limited access or single car access (separate "in"
and "out") to Adams Rdo from the Centero
!5) Across-the-road bumpa along Adams Rd. north and south
a block f'oam the 5prague interseetionQ
6) Consideration for safety of the many horses and riders
in the area.
7) No loudspeaker promotions or carnivals.
8} No taverns9 pool halls,or similar recreation establiash-
ments on the premiseso
9) The same resulations for outdoor burning of iJaste
materials that must be observed by the rest of the neighborhoodo
a83riere to an
ro.~,,,lde a,Y1.d. ea S~qQ eg 9 ,
e ~ ,~9,~,nta~n g t
I, ur~e tY~. omeoy~erg
Z ~o.~$~t h ~ a~raw~, w ,
Nie ~'~~°~n~ to ~
oul~s pl~. ~t cQ~erG~.a E
017 er aZ~" a,:,a .o~~ Q~ e O-f ~ e,rig e a ~
ro"qi~e
~a ~,d. ~8 8 ° ~adr,es g.,
D
V v
° -1
t ' Qt `
~
~r 17
a ~
r ,
~twor
'A
~ v F
r Z,
r
n
'
Y~
~r
r
1
~ a
`r
4
~
~
r
~
MINUTES
April 30, 19 71
ZONE C H A N G E Tr"L, 1~1r t- i 0 E ~~1 C6 tt Prs
ZE-34-71 - AGRSCULTURAL TO CC?MMERCIAL. SHERVtIDUD AND RQBERTS
SPQKANE , INC.
Planrung Commission Reeommendation Approve to Commercial Zone,
subject fio the followinq conditians
A. Conditions.
1. Dedication and ampravement to County standards of the East Ia' of
the advertlsed property. (Improvements shall include curb, side-
walk, and paving to exzsting oa.l
2. Dedication and improvement of 2nd Avenue along the Iength of the
proJect (see plot plan on file) to Gounty standards (The applicant
shall provide a 60' r/w for Second Avenue and improve saZd street
to County standards. )
3. Dedication and xmprovement of a north-south street along the west
boundary of the project tThe applicant shall be obligated to secure
a 60' r/w and improve said r/w to County standards. The new
street shall replace 1840-5, the previously dedxcated north-south
street (See Engineer's File 1840-8.).
4. The Director af Planrung shall approve a specific landscape plan
and appropnate bond for accomplishment of landseaping require-
ments in connection with any building permit lssued withun the
project area (such plan shall indicate appropriate landseape treat-
ment along Sprague Avenue).
5, The Director of Flanrung shall approve a specific extenor lighting
plan for the project area prior to installata.on of suCh lighting.( Such
plan shall attempt to confine illumxnatYOn to the shopping center area
with full consxderation to ad, _ning residential gropertxes).
6 The shopping center may have ane (1) free-standing center identifi-
cation sign not exceeding one hundred and fifty (150) square feet in
area and 35 feet in height. Permanent extenor signs for individual
establishments shall, when exceeding forty (40) square feet xn area,
be placed flat against the btuldrng faeing a street, the acce s s ory
parking area or pedestrian mail. All szgns may be illuminated
provided that they shall not be animated nor flashing.
7. InstallatZVn by the applicant of a security fence to be appraved by
the Director of Planning between 2nd Avenue and the Milwaukee Road
track s .
- 12 - (contd. )
ZE-34-71 - AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL (contd. )
B. Reasons
1. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the properties between
Sprague Avenue and the Milwaukee Road tracks in the Vera area are
appropnate for commercial uses. The Commission has been
recommending approval of applications for Commercial zorung along
Sprague Avenue in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Planning Commission is of the opina.on that site improvement
reqw.rements such as construction of roadways, installation of
landscaping, fencing, and restnction of signing and lighta.ng should
be incorporated into the project proposal presented to the Commission
to reduce the development's impacfi on surrounding residential
properties and to provide for needed traffic circulation to and wrthin
the site.
Note • The Planning Commi s sion take s note of the fact that the site plan
presented is preliminary and the Commission does not intend by the
action recommended above to reqw.re construction according to said
plan, nor indeed, to imply the granting of any waiver to ordinance
setback or other re.quirements.
C. General Data•
1. Location. Section 23, Township 25 N. , Range 44, E,W. M.
That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of
Section 23 lying north of the CYucago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad,
except the West 910 feet.
2. Applicant• Sherwood and Roberts Spokane, Inc.
West 516 First Avenue
Spokane, Washungton
3. Site Size • Approx.L 3tely 5 acre s
4. Existing Zoning. Agrlcultural, e stabli shed March 27, 1942
5 Proposed Zomng: Commercial
6. Proposed Use of
Property: Shopping Center
7. Application of Zoning
Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040
- 13 -
the food -ple
S U P E R M A R K E T S GENERAL OFFICES EAST 3301 SPRAGUE AVENUE
SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99202
P►pri 1 27, 1971
APR '4ENI
t1r Robe rt N. l3 rown
Shadle Center, Inc.
Old i'lational Bank Quilding
Spokane, Washington
Dear Bob
This letter is to confirm our intention of entering
into a 25 year lease for a super market of approximately
22,500 square feet located on the northeast portion of the
Central Valley Shopping Center that you are developing in
Spokane Valley, under the terms and unclerstandings that we
agreed on in our meetinq of today.
It is understood that we have several cletai1 s to work
out sucli as the exact dimensions of the store, where it
sits on the property in relation to the other buildings to
be built and other details, all of which we anticipate will
work out easily
Yours truly,
ROSAUER' S SUPER MARKETS, IfJC
J 11. Rdsauer
President
JP1R ce
- -
- - c ~
ZE-34-71
In the matter of a hearing to coasider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to
Commercial on property described as that portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 239
Township 25 No, Range 44, E.WoM., lying north of the Chicago, Milwaukee9 Sta Paul, and
Pa.cific Railroad, except the West 910 feet, Spokane County, Washingtone
(Southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and Adams Road)e
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SSe
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
Being first duly sworn, deposes and sayst
at all t~.mes mentioned herezn he was, and now is, a citizen of Tk~e United
lattesg
a resident t of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
yearse
c ,
That on 19 , he personally posted three (3) true
and correc copies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
followi.ng places in Spokane County, to-wit t
~
~ ,
~I ~ Y _
t I
2. Jf ~ f~- • ~
. - l
,
I-J, 30 .
,
a . ,
,
Subscribed and sworn to me ` J
19
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTQN
Reslding at Spokane, Washington
APRTL AGENDA SPOKANE GOUNTY COURT HOUSE
SPOKANE CaUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TELEPHONE NO.. 456-22?4
Time Friday, April 30, 1971 , 9:00 A.M.
Place Assembly Room, County Court House
ZONE CHANGE
10. ZE-34-71, Agricultural to Commercial
a. Locativn. Section 23, Townsh.ip 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M.
That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 af
Sectzon 23 lyzng north of the Ghicago, Milwaukee,
St. Pau1, and Pacifle Railroad, except the west
910 feet.
b. Applicant Sherwaod and Roberts Spokane, Tnc.
West 516 Flrst Avenue
Spokane, Wash in,gton
C. Site Size Approximately 5 acres
d. Existzng Zonzng Agricultu.ral, established Mareh 27, 1942
e. Propaged Zoning Commerclal
f. Proposed i3se af Property° Shc+pping center
g. Applicatzan af Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21 .040
/9&,SpQAr~ u IA~
7 av~.
..t1
C ►~t.S~ p.~P,,2,$.Ce,
~kt-1if-'t4 f-#-#i+- -
3Rb
Ce ' ~
~ 4dVG
~ . . ,
h
Z ~
ou
~ !V 4 P.7' q
%3 a q~ 'SCA'
~
~
10
19 March 71
Ti#le Tnsvrcance Cor~pany
Spoka►ne Caunty Pianniag Covmission
Zone ChanqeJfpltcatiQn,
Please fumish a list of the owner$ an►d taxpayer$ of recard pf a1x pFOpexty located wiftn 400 feet
of #h8 foUowino described Propertv
That paYtion af the NE 1/4 cr€ rthe IVW 1/4 lying Ai'ort,h of c. M a st a Pi. & PPV/W, except the w s 10 °
thereft+om and 3prague Avgnue orii the AloaEh and A+dama Road on the East, In Section 23, TowM-
shlp 25 N. e Rai1ge 44, E.1fV.M. •$p0kene COu1ty, W8sh11tgtOn.
Aleo, Please Include a11 mortgage and loan numbers wlth addresses when poeaible, $o that
proper naw"catimn may be maft. Thank you.
ZE-34-71, Agr#cultural to COwm.eratal
,
3lerwood & Roberts, Inc.
~
~
.
r SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Cour't House, Spokane 1, Waslvngton
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL BUSIIVESS OR _ COIVIMERCIAL ZONE,
.
PART I: Information to be furnished the Planmng Comznission with an application for a Zone
Change to Local Business ox Commercial o
1. Development Plan - a scale drawing of agplicant°s property and surrounding
streets showing:
a. Size, number, and type of proposed establishments,
b, Offmstreet parking and loading areas proposed,
c Proposed access and egress points (curb cuts)P and
de Landscaping, screening~ or fencing proposed
~
2. Economic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development which is
to include •
a. Type and size (square feet of sales space) of each establishment to be
built within the area proposed to be zoned,
b. Number of spaces of off-street parking proposed,
c. Estimate of annual sales needed to support each establishment,
d. Location of and distance from neare st competitive facilitie s,
e. Estimated market area of establishments within area proposed to be zoned
(indicate on a map showing the vicinity of proposed zone change); and
f If estimated market area include s competit.ive facilities, indicate
percentage of sales expected to be received by proposed facilitxes.
3. Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners
of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundari.es of subject
property.
PART II :
Date : March 249 1971 Application No.. Ze-34-71
Name of Applicant. Sherwood & Roberta Spokane Inc .
Street Addre s s. w 53.6 First A-m City, spokane State. Wash
Telephone Number: TE 8 - W1
Existing Zone Classification. Agri.cultnrs].
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: ,
Proposed Zone Classzfication Caanmercial _
Proposed U se of Property: Buainese and S o a No. of Acre s: 5
•
Legal Description of Property: That ; ortien ei' tha 1~► ef thR M lidro wort:h Of +h~
C.M. St. P. & P. RA emcept the W 910 feet thezeof and Spragne lvenue on the
Nox•th and Adams R.oad an the East, in Section 23, Tamah3.p 25 Noath, Re,nge
East of the Wi1'Lamette Meric3ian ia Spokaae Caunty, Waahingtoa
Section: 23 Township: 25 Nortb Range E.Y~
Street Address of Property: In the I1000 BLeek on East S,oa~a~ ne n~imh~r haA t~~n ~asigr~d
Who Flolds Title to the Property: Kenneth D. PbRraoa snd Elberti;m Pearson, his Wi.fe _
If you do not hold title to the property affected by thi s application, what i s your intere st in it ?
An exclusive option to lsaee the property fcr a period oY 20 7ears with twc
10 year exteneions if desirel
A SKETCH OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR A ZONE RECLASSIFICATION MUST BE ATTACHED WITH
THIS APPLICATION, THE SKETCH MUST BE ON A SCALE OF 1" = 400° Maps may be secured
from the County Engineer's Office, Court House.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWEREI?;
1. What are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or addi.tional zoning:
The propetW 3mmedietely adjoining thia oonsists oY 910 feet of v=9gXt1r_
oa the West thart 38 presentl,y zoned counercial. It has been used as a
tra3.ler sales lot in the past.
2. What facts justify the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement of the
public health, safety, and general welfare ?
Thia property in questioa together with the W 910 Peet ad;io; is beina
planned for an extensive shoppc3sag center. The vse af the ]rand as a shopping
center w3.11 be an improvement ov+ar its present use and will porovide a la,rge
area fox shopping in ashopping center.
3. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the value and character of
adj acent prope-rty ?
The zoae chamge woUld tead to inmease the value ut` tha snrraundimg_prorertV.
Thm trailer sales 'yard is to be removed &W ;LU i+ so 1 be g*+~t an~
extensive shopp3ng center. ,
,
e
e - ~4. Can a reasonable return from ox reasonable use of the property,iin question be secured
under the existing zone classification?
Noe This propert7 is pacesentl,v zoned agr3.cultural and it 3A in sn area ,
w'here agricultural nse vi1l not begia to provice afxeaeonab].e returmm fraan
the propsrtyo
A FEE OF MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATI~ON,
~~~~DOLLARS
}
ANY APPEAL FROM ACTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MUST BE PRESENTED
IN WRIT-ING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE' PLANIVING COMMISSION e
r & RaBF~RTS SPOKAN$ ~1C.
("si~
Y ' -
.
1
b ~ a •
a
~
~ate
Spokans Cotunty Plaraninq COtnmiesiml
CaAty Cowrt Iiouso
Spokaae. `"Ja9hingtman 99201
~
Ge~beayeri:
,de e the undersigned pmPertY owne`so rOquest the 3PQcane County Planning Commiaslan
tto consider a zonsng pian3 cr (to mnsider changsog the monlaQ Mp' from
Agricultural ~ to Commercial . . .
an the foUavAnQ described propettyt
That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 lying North of C.1VI. St . P.& P. R/W, except the W 910'
therefrom and Sprague Avenue on the North and Adams Road on the East, in Section 23, Town-
ship 25 N., Range 4+4, E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington.
~ , ~ . ,n,.or,. , F,
w* ~ _ . , . .
. , . I ADDRE& ~ ' ~i.~~i.,,~E§C ~.,p.~.ON QF PROP~RT"Y
, , ~ ~ •s~• " _ •s.~
lr
E 700 ft of W 910 ft of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 Sec
. 23 lqg N of RR r/w exc S 60 ft.
W 90 f t of S 106 f t of N 306 f t of W 1/w Tr
~ 68 ~
, - ~ . ~ . - . . .
1/4 of NW 1/4 Sec 23, lyg W of E
762.6 f t& S of C.M. St P b P Ry r/w exc E
• c~~ ~-t. _ 30 f t of W 105 f t of N 30 f t
, • ,
a
.e~.-
4 '1 A..C41
W 1/2 Tr 68, exc r/w & exc N. 306 ft.
~ E121ftofW211ftofN306ftofW1/2Tr
„
68 . . . ,
. N. 306 ft. of W 1/2 Tr 68, exc. W 211 it.
1; , `6 A ~ ; f ' '1'7~m~' . " J~~ , . ~ • ~ ~
• n f 1 4 of SW 1/4 Sec 4 daf : Be
5 4 2. ~ f~~ ~ jo f t N o f S W 1~ 4 cor; t hg N 3 1 2
f t; t t; th S 312 ft; t h W 165 ft to
90 ft of N 200 ft of the W 1/2 Tr 68
D .
-77
1
. x==. kIwEvmcw@L.., . .9m a .
Ptn SE 1 4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 14 daf: Beg
797.5 ft E of SW cor of SW 1/4; th E 150
t; th N 722.5 ft; th W 150 ft; th S 722.5
, . . ,
1 2 of Fol : Beg 1947 . 5 f t E of SW cor of
W 1/4 Sec 14; th E 150 ft; th N 722.5 ft;
. .5 f t to pob.
' h W 150 f t; th S 722 .
~~c/~ ' . . . _ . .
~
1/2 of E ~1/2 Tr 68 exc_sl-w - -
` of ;
of Fol: Beg 1947•5 ~t E
~~?7~~ ~ SW 1~4 1/4 Sec 14; th E.l~h =
~ _ . , _ ccY of SW f t ~
SW ~ N ~22. 5 f t; th W 150
,d /3 f t. ~ t ob .
a ~'3 g 7 22 .~5 f t to P -
. .
1 ~ 7 . ~ . . _ ~•W {f~ ~ ..=.A '~3 ? LP r~~ifi r~~d~SL1 . . ir
r
16 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _.....~...f.~~-~.,.:.. ~
.,...s _ _ ..r ~
J
~
PAUL A CLAU8EN TEL6PHONE
THOMAS H BROWN 624-9219
CLAUSEN & BROWN
ATTORNEYS AND COUHSELOR6
702 FIOELITY BUILOING
SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201
May 5, 1975 _
Spokane County Planning Office J
Spokane County Courthouse
Spokane, Washington, 99210
ATTENTION John D, Konen Re Saf eco Building
Gentlemen
All landscaped areas will be equipped with sprinkling
systems, fully to provide for sprinkling all trees,
shrubs, lawn and ground cover and any other vegetation
requiring water
These are shown on -the complete landscape plans of
the ,landscape architect
Very truly yours,
, ~
By ~ _
PAC js Paul "A Claus en
,
a • t ~ ~
LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES Ofi1 PROPERTY
~
Spokane County Code Nwonber: ZE-34-71 Owners and Persona within 400 feeto
Application is for a Proposed Zone Chancte - Actricua.tLra1 to Commercial
. / .
Certification of Title Compan,y: I hereby certify that the following list of names and
`addresses consisting of this and the followl.ng pages has been prepared from the
latest available records and is to the best of my know~ ge correcte C. (o f 75~--/~
'`~.~~-G~. 7/
Signed by For PAneer National Title Ins Co
(Title Company)
Date : Mar ,h 240 1471
LA'ST GRANTEE IN CBAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AA1D ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERS ONS PAYIlVG TAXES (T)
0 VERA
T
o O - N 306 f t of vh Tr 68
Washington Mutual exc W 211 f t
T
_ Sav ngs Rank LHA 5404
0
T '
` o ani . ~ Tr 68 exc r/w & exc
l ,,nna
Zincoln Firstl Federal , N 306 ft
T~ySatringg Rr- Tnan I, 2003-6
0
~ .
T
~ ~ Mn=T -Ea t 14704 SDraeue W 90 f t of N 200 f t
o f the Tr ~~i8
T
0
20 So11th 23 AdaM~ Roa.d W 90 f t of S 106 f t of
N 306 f t of VA T 68 ~T ~
0
T,
UQCa r r a
IE121ftOfW2l1 ftOf
0 -
~
_ T, Linc First Fed Sav & Zo L 2003-6 N ►306 f t of W}~ T it 68
' ( Cor.tinued on next page )
e
!
~ LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PR4PERTY
Spokane County Code Piucnber: ZE-34-71 Owners and Persons within 400 feet e
Application is for a Proposed Zone Change - Agricultural to Commercial
Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and
addresses consisting of this and the following pages has been prepared from the
latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge corrects
Signned by For Pioneer National Title Ins Co
_ (Title Company)
Date : March 24, 1971
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOrI'S BLK
PERS ONS PAYING TAXES (T)
0 Estate of Vernon A. Moss Vh of E)~ Tr 68 exc r/w
T Norman A. Moss North 5001 Allen Pl.
0
T
Catholic Bishop 0 of S-Dokane P. Oe Box 1453 Spokane; Tr 69 exc E 198 ft &
exc r/ w
T '
0 DALE HOMES FIRST ADDAIOIV
. . _ . T
T A
0 Ste~phe~n G e Pettibone
TCommerce Mortgage L 25951+0 W& S 84660
` - .
, p
T
,
- - o William P. Farley 214-603 _ 2
T Carroll Mortgage Z 90 826 220
0
T
0 James A. Mi.nnick East 14603 Riverside 3
T
- 0 _
T ' (Coritinued on next page)
s-_~-_ !
; ~ 1~~+5! G_~ ~ Ti~~~ i ~i r~.-Li;i
0~ TIi~(0) e•~ ~ ADD-q r,"SS L~JTS NLY, ~
1 Ft...':~S0iJJ i t I' S t i)_
~ _ _
0 Hal R. Dixon Box 2565 Spokane j 4& 5
T
i p
~ . I i, \{YIqVa ' _ V
T 1
1
L '
4 Fred A. Martin et al East 14612 Riverside , 6& 7~
T
r...., _ _
_ 0 VERAbAI,E, =HOME3 SUBDIVISION OF TRACT ~,1 OF VERA
T -
~ Thomas A. Caldwell East 14801 Riverside 2, 3& 4 1 2
I
S - - - - - - - - - - - - u.....~ _ . , - _ - t - - - _
I
0 ,.i
T
- - y
0 Thomas A. Caldwell East 12801 Riverside 1& 4 I 3
T ~
0
; ; - - - - - - - - - ~ - : L
T
; - ~ _
0 Clinton R e Steward R C~}9 ~ 2
~ ~ - - - - - -----~z~-.: - -
; .
T M. H. Bralik lEast 11305 27th
~
~ 0 ~
' T
,
~
~ 0 MartZn TR _ M[:KPP Nor .h -12-A ams Roqe 3 3 ,
T
-
• 0 SECTION 14-25-44
.
. !
l 0 PtnSE~~ of SW~ of Sec 14
Q- G. Jiy1.1and[~-'~-~
daf. . Beg 797.5 f t E of
hA,
~ Zincoln First ~Federal I SW cor of ;th .~I5O
..~~n,ga a~ L o a~ Z 1503 f t; th 1V 7 2 e 5 f t; th W
-T5U ft ; tN e ft-
~ 0 to pob.
~
T
. ,
r'
I,1+S,, GF~?iiEP, I:I C:~111 , _ ADTJT lY0'4-
, _ _
~ 0~' TI i ~ ; (0) ~ ~ A DD PS LOTS ~ ~ ~LY
~ 1'~►t50~JS PAYlii~ W_-ES (T)_ _
-jPtn N~o-f Sec 23,_-
; , 0 I~an~e1, R. Thomas East 14501 4th Il~rg W of E 6206 ft & S
` of C, -M, St P& P Ry r/w
T exc E 30 f t of W 105 f t
~ .
oi
0
T
E 700 ft of W 910 ft of
0
C. A. Manos ~~o~ NE~ o f N~ ~ e c 2'~ lva N
Route 2, Box 94B of RR r/w ekc S~Q f t-v
~~T Kenneth D. Pearson Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
0 ' T
S 60 ft of ~ 700 feet of
, 0 SDokan.e County W910 f t of I N04 Qf NW14
S e c 23, l y gIN of RR r/w
S -
0
-
T
0 ~
T .
0
T
,
1 0
4 T
c ~
~ O
T
,
0 1 _
T _
- 0 -
T ~ . _
0 -
t
T
0 -
. T # -
~ j i ~ _ _ _ -r ~ _ - _ - - - - ~ ~ y. - - - - - - -
IJS'1' GP~, Ii S-E 3.': C. --_D ADDI iIW1 ~
0F (0) 1 D ~ AD~0T.-;SS I~OTS T BLK ~
FKY! iaG T PfE3 (T )
Elh of fol: Beg 1947 e 5
0 D. B. Burger 0 f tE of SW cor of SWX
~
, ,~v • Sec 14; th E 150 ft; th
' _T Spokane Valley S& Z I, 2398 . N 722 . 5 f t, th W 150 f t;
th JS '/22.5 ft to pob e
~ _0 . . ~ ..w~ . ....~~.,...o....._.~
~
~
T _ _ _ 1 . - - - - - ~
. . r - - - - - - SWA of fol l Beg 1947 e 5
0 D 4 E ftFof ST~ ~,L~
~~lb~'~F Aeo,4* f SL,U-.
~
Spokane Valley Sec 14; th E 150 f t; th
T Savings & I,oan , , N'722 e5_ f t,q th W 150 f_t ;
th S 722 . 5 f t to pob.
. ,
0
T ,
Ptn of SEy4 1of SWA Sec 14
J 4..._W.- a e 1 s1.af..' BE.~- ? -~ft---~i-&,
V--,T 80 f t N of Sy~ cor; th N
_Lloyd_ Z 4,_ Boneriko South _421_.. Di ~._.hman. M~c~a 312 f t; th lE 165 f t; th
Road
0 pob
T
O fiFCTT()N' ?~-g
. - . ~ - -
T .
, Ptn NEy4 of 'NWy~ Sec 23,
0~, E' I. Pettibone _~of C, M,_ - St glP~ ~&ft P
Ernest Matthew or Ry Co ?=w 4xc
, T Eo I. Pettibone Pouth 20 Adams Road
.
i 0 - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~
i T
~ Catholic Bishop -Beg 258 .7 t W of SE cor
# 4 of Snolu~eK of NEA of Sec 23 ~-th
w 503.9 f t th N 627 f t
; T m/1 to S 1 of r/w of _
' C, M, St PI& P Ry; th E
, 0 alg S r/w ]~a 503.9 ft to ,
- pob
T , -
. p _
_ r
T ~
Cathollc Bishop E 258.7 ft of NEA of NW)4
_ 0of.apokane • Sec 23 l.y9 S of C, M, St
~ P&PRy Cl r/w
T '
,
,
~ - 0
T - #
r
~ ~
~
~ You are here~ natified, that on Y
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , at ~he hour of ~ : ~ ~ ~ . ~ , vf said
da in the S okane Cvun Court Hause, S vkane, Washin ton,
Y' P p ~
The SPC~KANE CC~UNTY Pl.ANNING C~MMISSI+~N will con~
duCf q u~3~IC h~dl'In f0 c~~~t~~~ c~~~~t~~ z~r~~~r~ x~ ~~a~
g
1l~rRI~~3L~'iiR~L CC~~i~lEACI.~~~ ~Ei34•~~~ BP~N~U~~A BY B~i~RWQQ~
~QB~RT~ ~Ft~~A~~, l~C. ~ ~1+~8~ ~~~~T AV'~~tU~~ ~~4~A~~, 1A►J18~x~'~*
F~iR A PRQP+A~~D 1~3Bt~~8~ ~I~iJ~ ~~IU~'P~N~ ~R$A,
Genera~ descri tian of are+~: T~'~t portlo~ ~v~' t~i N~ ~/+4 0~' tl~~
~
~iW 1/~ ot ~~ct~Da ~~t ~+~r~n+~~~p ~t~aQ~g• 4~, E.~',~., ~y~~~ a~rth
t~f Cl~lo~+~~~ ~l~~r~u1~~e, ~t. ~+~u~ ~ ~~►+~1flc ~a~lr~~d ~ ~r~c+~,~~ ~h•
~+•~t ~ i a ~p+~~:~a~ CQ~nty ~ wva~b~noto~.
(~~r~~~►~~r~~ vt~r~~r a►! ~pt+~q~~~► A~r~~u• ~~d Ad~~~ R~ad.)
F~R FURTHER DETAILS confa~t #h~ S vkane Coun ~'~annin P ~Y g
Camr~iss~on, S okc~ne Cvunt Court Hvuse, S~kan~, Wash. P Y P
Direcfor of Planning
r o n M p 4 4 r ~ n ~ G 0 M M, 9/ e s Spokaee Co~n~y Plaaning Commissivn
~
~ HAWORTH SANDERSON INC.
WEST 621 MALLON AVENUE
SPOKANE,'!'JASHINGTOM 99201 • (509) 327-9579
April 21, 1975
Safeco Tnsurance Company
of America
c/o Mr. Paul A. Clausen, Attorney
702 Fidelity Building
Spokane, WA 99201
Gentlemen:
Please find accompanying this letter ten (10) copies of the en-
vironmental assessment which you requested for the proposed new
divisional office headquarters to be located in Spokane, Wash-
ington. Your policy of preparing and Drovidinq for the use of
local authorities such an assessment when not specifically
required by law is commendable and certainly should be con-
sidered a thoughtful community service.
The format of the assessment is very similar to that which is
recommended for draft impact statement preparation in the
latest proposed draft guidelines for the implementation of the
Washington State Environmental Policy Act, presented for review
by the 4Jashington Council on Environmental Policy in December
of 1974. As will be found evident upon examination of the as- `
sessment, most categories of environmenta] concern are not sig-
nificantly affect by the proposed project. Those environmental
considerations which are examined in detail are the issues of
air quality, traffic and related congestion questions, noise
impact and sewage treatment.
On the whole, we find this to be a sound project environmentally.
We want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the inde-
pendent environmental analysis for this proposed building. We 1
hope that we might be of service in the future. I
Sincere]y,
HAWORTH AND AN DERSON , I PJC .
c..7/ ~ .
Anthony H. Anderson,
Presi dent
AHA:kjh
enc.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE PLANNING • ECONOMICS ~ HOUSING • URBAN & REGIONAL STUDIES
~
t
ENVIRONMEyTAL ,
A S S E S S M E N T
,
S,4FEC0 I NSURANCE COMPAPJY D I V I S I ON ,OFF I CE .
1 "
1
14500 E. S,PP.AGUE AVENUE
SPOKANE, WASHIPJGTON
- RECEIVED
APR 2 11975
SP0KANE COUNT`(
V'LaNNIIVG COMMISSION
ENVIRONMENTAL
A S S E S S M E N T
for
SAFECO I PJSURANCE COMPANY DI V I S IOPJ OFF I CE
114500 E. SPRArUE AUENl1E SPO,KANE, WASH I NGT,ON
_ prepared for
, • _
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
by
i
HAWORTH A"JD APJDERSOPJ, INC.
THE FLOUR "1I LL
bJEST 621 PIALLON AVENUE
SPOKANE , 'WASH I NGTON 99201
(509) 327-9579
~ . <
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AREAS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT COPJSIDERED . . . . . . . . . .
SUMMARY. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
THE ENVIROPJ"1ENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 32
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF MAN'S
ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-
TERM PRODUCTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
GROWTH-INDUCING Ih1PACTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE COPIMITMENTS OF RESOURCES 46
ADVERSE IMPACTS WHICH MAY BE MITIrATED . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
,
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
UNAUOI DABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
APPENDICES:
APPENDIX A: Complex Source Permit Review. . . . . . . . . . . A-1
APPENDIX 6: Design Data for Sewage Treatment Plant. . B-1
APPENDIX C: Application for Review of Complex Source. C-1
APPENDIX D: Letter Concerning Phased Operation of the
Sewage Treatment Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1
ii
AREAS OF THE PHYSICAL ENUIRONMENT CONSIDERED*
Paqe
EARTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 32
Geol ogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Soi 1 s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12, 32
Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Unique Physical Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Erosion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Deposition/Accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/a
AIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 32
Ai r Qual i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13, 32
C1 imate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 34
Surface Water Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Runoff/Absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 34
Fl oods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Surface Water Quanti ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Surface Water Qua 1 i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Groundwater Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 34
Groundwater Quanti ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19, 34
Groundwater Qua 1 i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 34
FLORA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 35
Species Significantly Affected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22, 35
Endangered Speci es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Barriers and/or Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23, 35
Species Significantly Affected. . . . . . . , . . . . . . 23, 35
Endangered Spec i es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Barri ers and/or Corri dors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
*NA = No reasonable likelihood that the proposarl, including its
secondary effects, will have a significant effect upon the area (or
subarea) of the environment.
iii
NO I SE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23, 36
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279 41
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279 41
Vehicula r Transportation Generated. . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Impact Upon Transportation System . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Movement/Circulation of People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Waterborne and/or Ai r Traffi c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
LOCAL SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 42
Fi re . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 42
Pol i ce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28, 42
Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29, 42
Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Mai ntenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Other Governmental Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
ENERGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 43
Amount Requi red . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Source/Avai 1 abi 1 i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 43
UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309 43 -
Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30, 43
Wate r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30, 43
Sewe r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309 44
Storm Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30, 44
Sol i d Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30, 44
Tel ephone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
HUMAN HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
AESTHETICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 44
ftECREATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
~
iv
suMMARY
The Safeco Insurance Company of America proposes to construct a re-
gional headquarters building in the Spokane Valley on 10.9 acres of land on
the southwest corner of Spraque Avenue and Adams Road. The land is currently
zoned for such an activity and only awaits issuance of a buildinq permit by
Spokane County. (See Map 2 under "Description of the Proposed Pro,ject" for
a general site plan.) The building will be one and two stories in height,
be set in extensive landscaping, have adjacent to it at the rear enouqh
parking for all employees and be designed of limited exterior glass for
enerqy conservation. The employee number and necessary floor space are to
be expancied in 1981, 1986, and 1991. Safeco has readily agreed to numerous
conditions relating to landscaping, screening, dedications and road construc-
tion.
~ &afeco intends, with as minimal environmental impact as possible, to
provi de empl oyment for from 213 persons to nearly 600 persons over a 15 year
phased expansion time period. It hopes to draw on as many nearby Qersons as
possible for employees. It intends to house these employees in as attractive
and pleasant an atmosphere as possible and to portray an equally tasteful ex-
ternal image to i ts neighbors.
Surface grading will disturb the existing topsoil layer, however, it
will be suitably reshaped and conserved by the landscapinq process This
and other related excavating work will qenerate dust, which could create a
suspended particulate problem unless dust control measures are practiced to
mitigate the impact.
It is not anticipated that qroundwater quality will be affected. The re
is a remote Qossibility of such an occurence in the event of sewaqe plant
failure. However, even in such a case, the dilution capacity of the under-
ground Spokane aquifer is such that in the foreseeable future it could handle
a temporary failure.
1
Construction noise due to heavy equipment, muffled or not, will cause
some degree of discomfort. The unquantifiable questions are: degree of
muffling, proximity of the listener, and the tolerance level of the listener.
It is felt that everyday surrounding activities will be very nominally affected
due to ave rage construction equioment.
On-site sewage disposal always poses a potential for adverse environ-
mental impact. In this instance the potential is placed in perspective by
the plant's design capacity of over 14,000 gallons per day of sewage. ,4
failure in this case could be noticeable, more so in its potential for odor
rather than groundwater contamination. A properly maintained and operated
plant is essential.
If proper steps, as outlined above, are taken with regard to the limited
number of potential adverse impacts, the Safeco project should indeed be
one whose impacts on the environment are minimal.
2
DESCRIPTION OF TNE PROPOSED PROJECT
The Safeco Insurance Company of America proposes to construct a
regional headquarters building in the Spokane Valley.
The chosen location is the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Adams Road on that parcel of land extending 880 feet west of the center
line of Adams Road and south of Sprague Avenue to the C.M., St. Paul and
Pacific R.R. Co. (Milwaukee) right of wayimore fu]ly described as follows:
That portion of the NE4 of the NW4 of Section 23, Townshit) 25
North, Range 44 East, W.P1., Spokane County, Washington, described
as follows:
Beginning at a point which is 20 feet west and 50 feet south of
the north quarter corner of said Section 23; thence S0°06'36"G1,
along the west line of Adams Road, 601.n4 feet to the north rlqht
of way line of C.M., St. P. & P. Railroad; thence S89°58'33"W,
along said right of way, 393.93 feet; thence NO°08'24"E, 60.00
feet; thence N89°58'33"W, 466.07 feet; thence NO°06'36"E, 561.81
feet to the south line of Sprague Avenue; thence East, along
said south line, 845.00 feet; thence S36°47'58"E, 24.98 feet to
the point of beginning.
Containing 506,472 sq. ft.
Al1 except the easterly 393.93 feet thereof was zoned commercial in
1967. The Spokane County Planning Commission after a public hearinq ap-
proved commercial zoning for the subject parcel on April 30, 1971 with
certain conditions, and the action of the Plan Commission was approved
May 13, 1971. More recent zoning actions by the County Commissioners have
completed all necessary zoning procedures. The action remaining is the is-
suance of a buildinq permit.
The Comprehensive Plan designates that the properties betv►een Snraque
Avenue and the railroad right of way in the Vera area are appropriate for
commercial uses.
3
~
~ - ~ ~ - - - ; - - - ~ ; l
- 1 ~ A. , ~ - -
~ Ov
~ I l,~►NDSC.~►PI~l6 '
Y--7 e5)
~
~
( - - ~ , - - - ~ ~
i ' A
1_. _
-1 8A~GG0 __B~tLDI!~G
' ~
~ - l u- = 1700
L4NDSCAPfiqG
`-F- XFxNS1 ON - - ~ - ~
~ ~ - - -
I '
SEVYAGIM- ~
PI.ANT I
0 z o ( - - ' ; - ~ ~ ~~►~N ~
M {
It1 x ' - - ~ - ' - - - - ~ - - ~ - - .
ZZ - - - - - ' - -
~
~ - ~ - - - rn ~ , - , f -r - ~ , - - - ~ - - -
' ~ i i
The almost inPxorable trend dictates that all land between Sprague
Avenue and the railroad track be used for commercial or business purnoses.
The only doubt relates to the type of commercial or business purposes.
Concommitant wYth the approval by the County Commissioners of this
site being changed from agricultural to commercial zone, many residents
of the area expressed to the commissioners concern about the traffic,
noise and loitering produced by shopping centers. (The use then antici-
pated was that the premises would be used for a shopping centerithough not
limited to such a use.)
Proposed Quildinq and Site Develooment
The Architects were given, among others, the following desiqn
crite ria: '
*The building shouldiharmonize with both the residential and business
elemerits of the area. Safeco wishes to be a good neighbor and the design
should be done as to be a credit to the community and in modern good taste.
*It is to be designed as a single purpose building from the inside out
to accommodate Safeco's functional requirements.
*Since Safeco is employee oriented it must be designed with them in
mind to provide an enjoyable and pleasant place in which to work.
*Attention to landscaping and the elimination of unsightly parkinq both
from Sprague and Adams should be stressed and achieved.
5
Consideration is given to energy conservation in the completed
structure A very low level of heat loss has been achieved through extra
insulation, a reheat installation in the heating system. The cost per
cubic foot to heat and cool this building should be about 112 to 1/3 of the
amount necessary to heat a predominantly glass building such as the Wash-
inqton Mutual Building. Additionally, light fixtures are such that they
can utilize either l, 2, or 3 lamps depending upon the footcandle needs.
Cos t
The total cost of the project including land will be about three
million dollars.
Location of building
The building and future additions will be located as indicated in the
Site Plan, P1ap 1. No portion of the building or additions thereto will be
closer than 50 feet from the property lines on Sprague and no closer than
50 feet from the prope rty lines on Adams Road.
The height of the building and additions will be one and two stories
above ground.
Total Floor Space
The total floor space in the building will be 73,700 sq. ft., initially,
increased to 87,700 sq. ft. in the second phase and increased to 113,800
sq. ft. in the third phase.
Parki ng 'Lots
Parking lots will be generally located as shown on the Site Plan.
' Sufficient space will be allocated to provide for 205 cars during
phase one, 289 cars during phase two, and 409 cars during phase three.
Sign
Safeco has adopted a sign for its locations. It will be well within
the required guidelines, complimentary to the buildinq and in good taste.
(See E., below.)
s
6
Landscapinq
The Perron Partnership, P.C. (Spokane) has been employed to design the
landscaping. The generalized area is indicated on the Site Plan The land-
scaped areas will be provided with sprinkler systems. It is the goal of
Safeco to provide an attractive setting for itsbuilding for its own benefit
and for the benefit of its employees and neighbors. Screening of the sewage
plant on its north side is possibl)e due to southward shift of the plant and
its drainfield.
Utilization of the site
Because of the phased construction Safeco will in all probability uti-
lize all the space in the proposed building. There is a possibi]ity that a
small amount of its office space may be rented on a temporar,y basis.
The westerly 230 feet of the 860 feet being acquired by Safeco is
presently being reserved. If upon full development of architectural plans
such space is necessary to the proper and pleasing development of a reqional
headquarters building, it wi]1 be so used. If excessive, it will be made
available for uses compatible with the character of the Safeco building and
the neighborhood. Such land is now zoned c.ommercial.
Compliance with Conditions
A. Deeds to the east ten (10) feet of the subject property and to the
south sixty (60) feet of the east 393.93 feet thereof for the extension of
Second Avenue have been delivered to the County Engineers, prior to the
hearing before the County Commissioners on the ordinance.
B. Bonds satisfactory to the county have been furnished to insure im-
provements to the following riqhts of way bounding the Safeco project site.
(1) As to the east ten (10) feet dedicated for Adams road: curbing
paving and sidewalks in the manner and at the time requestPd
by the County Engineers.
(2) As to Second Avenue: curbing and pavinq.
(3) As to Sprague Avenue: sidewalks.
1 7
C. Prior to the request for a building permit a specific landscape
plan acceptable to the Director of Planning will be presented and a,bond
in sufficient sum to insure the execution thereof satisfactory to the county
will be furnished.
D. The specific exterior lighting plan shall be subject to the ao-
proval of the Director of Planninq prior to installation. Lighting will
meet the criteria given to the architects.
E. No animated nor flashing signs will be installed. Any sign shall
comply with county ordinances. The proposed sign will be located sub-
stantially as shown in the Site Plan. The sign, includinq its base, will
be about 14' X 8' in size or smaller--total heiqht being either 8' or not
over 14'--Double Face Plexiqlas with modest intensity._
F Safeco agrees to install a security fence as required and approved
by the Director of Planning between Second Avenue and the Milwaukee Road
tracks.
Safeco Insurance Company of America Safeco follows a decentralized approach to the supervision and manaQe-
ment of its property and casualty insurance business. It operates on a re-
gional basis through Division offices strategically located to represent a
defined geographical area. Essentially, each Division office is an autonomous
process and service center for its various service offices.
Today Safeco has twelve divisions covering the United States and one in
Canada. These thirteen Division offices are located at Seattle, Portland,
Burlingame (San Francisco), Panorama City (Los Anqeles), Fountain Valley
(Los Anqeles), Denver, Dallas, St. Louis, Chicaqo, Cincinnati, Atlanta, River
Edge (N.J.), and Toronto, Canada.
8
r
Safeco owns and operates eleven of its thirteen Division office buildings
while two (Portland and Chicago) are in rented space. All eleven are single
purpose buildings designed for Safeco's primary use. They vary in size from
50,000 to 110,000 gross square feet with employee populations from 200 to
600 people.
The Division Office
The Division office has staff responsibility for managinq the affairs
of Safeco within its territory which includes the management of a sizable
number of field personnel housed in smaller offices, called Service offices,
throughout the Division. Safeco markets its property and casualty insurance
through local independent insurance agents. It does not retail its products
directly to the public. Proposals for insurance are submitted to it by its
agents who are in contact with their clients or insureds. The Division
office almost exclusively receives its business by mail after which it is
underwritten and a policy issued. Approximately 50% of the peoole working
in a Division office are women and 50% are men. The desiqn of such an
office is therefore pointed toward an office employee environment rather than
a retail or customer environment. Although there is a claims manaqement and
review process at the Division office the claims adjusting staff and function
is performed at the Service office (field office). The Division office's
function is to process the paperwork generated by the local insurance
agents and the company. Company and agents supplies consisting of station-
ery, insurance forms, manuals, etc., are stored in a Division supoly depart-
ment and shipped to the agent when required.
The Service Office
The majori ty of Safeco fi el d peopl e work out of some 220 Servi ce offi ces
maintained across the United States and Canada of which each Division has
several. The Service office for Spokane, consisting of 23 people, is located
in the 400 Jefferson Building, Spokane. Housed at the Service office are some
marketing and engineering staff trained to assist the local independent aqents
as well as Safeco claims people. To maintain prompt claim service Safeco main-
tains its own claims staff rather than engage that of an independent adjusting
company. Much of the Service office staff is made up of claims people. It is
9
through the claims department and at the Service offices that contact is
made with the insured or public and not at the Division office.
The Spokane Division
A. Geographical Area
The geographical area will include the states of Montana, Idaho and
that area in Washington east of the Cascade Mountains.
B. Business
At the time of its opening the insurance premium volume will be
approximately $25 million.
C. Staff
The estimated personnel required to staff the Division are as
follows:
Date People
7/1/76 Opening 213
7/1/81 5 years 323
7/ 1/86 10 yea rs 458
7/1/91 15 years 579
The above estimates do not include the 23 personnel in the Spokane
Service office which it is planned will not be located at the Division ~
office.
D. Employee Considerations
During the site selection process some thirty-five sites were inspected,
and were narrowed down to three that were available and would best meet
Safeco's immediate and long range goals.
The site at the southwest corner of the interseetion of Spraque Avenue
and Adams Road in the llalley consisting of aaproximately 10.9 acres was
selected and a contract to purchase entered into, subject to the acquisition
of a valid buildinq permit. One of the most important considerations is the
avai 1 abi 1 i ty of an excel 1 ent empi oyment market. Studi es of the growth i n
population, homes, anartments and business in the Valley area and intervietvs
with employment agencies and other office employers pointed stronqly to the
10
availability of mature and desirable employees Safeco will expect to hire
locally a very high percentage of its staff of over 200 people. The future
projected staff calls for an office of 323 people by 1981 (5 years), 458 by
1986 (10 years), and 579 by 1991 (15 years). By locating their office, whose
staff will be 50% women, in such a rapidly and permanent growing suburban
area with a good mix of skills, Safeco expects to attract and hire skillful
personnel who live in the area, with the attendant advantage to these persons
of the savTngs in energy and transportation to and from work.
11
EXISTIPJC ENVIROtJMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Earth
Soils
A representati ve profi 1e of the soi 1, Garri son gravel 1y 1oam, GqA,
native to the site is~-
A. 2-5% slopes
B. 0-15 inches• black, very friable gravelly loam; granular
structure, slig htly acid
C. 15 to 44 inches: dark brown, friable, very qravelly loam;
neutral
D. 44 to 60 inches+: multi-colored sand, qravel and cobblestone.
The surface color, when moist, ranges from very dark brown to black.
The texture of the surface layer is qravelly or very gravelly loam or silt
, loam. The subsoil ranges in cclor from dark brown to yellowish brown. Clay
and lime have accumulated on the bottom of the pebbles in the lower subsoil.
The depth to the gravel substructure ranges from 30 to 55 inches.
This soil is somewhat excessively drained and has moderately raoid per-
meability. It holds about 5 inches of water that plants can use It is
easy to work. Roots penetrate to the layer of sand, qravel and cobblestones.
The fertility is mediurh and surface runoff is slow, with the resultinq chance
of erosion slight.
Any site excavations would produce no usable sand, only fair topsoil,
moderately fair gravel, and excellent road fill material. For irrigation pur-
poses the soil is characterized by a rapid water intake rate and, as p reviously
inferred, a moderate to low water holding capacity This is qenerally associ-
ated with very good conditions for sewage disposal drain fields The soils
1 U.S.D.A , Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey, Spokane County,
IrJashington, March, 1968, p. 18-19.
12
high shear strength and load carryinq capacity, slight compressability,
low shrink/swell potential and slight susceptibility to frost action, makes
it well suited to the proposed use. The above characteristics are indica-
tive of marginal capabilities for aqricultural uses.
Air
Air Quality~
The general ambient air quality in the Spokane region, in comparisQn
to other ma,jor metropolitan centers, can be considered excellent. There are
certai n probl em condi tions whi ch do exist (i e. , ca rbon monoxide and s us-
pended p articulates) which can be associated with specific causal factors.
Spokane, because of its topoqraphical and geographical location is sub-
ject to frequent inversions and other conditions abetting the poor disper-
sion Qf air pollutants in metropolitan Spokane. Oetailed meteorological
data is collected at the Spokane International Airport, and most of this in-
formation dealing with inversion frequency and wind speed is collected at
this location. Because the airport is located above the Spokane Vallev wall,
data collected here tends to over-estimate metropolitan wind speeds and
under-estimate the frequency, strength, and duration of inversions over the
metropolitan area.
Data collected at.the Spokane International Airport indicates inversions
occur at f requencies indicated below in Table 1.2
TABLE 1
Inversion Frequency (Percent)
Season 4 a.m. 7 a.m. 4 p.m 7 p.m
Winter 54 59 16 53
Spring 63 41 0 23
Summer 83 26 1 16
Fall 73 57 4 57
1 This section calls substantially on two published works• "Roundup Company
Spokane Valley Warehouse, Environmental Impact Statement", Jan. 1973, Haworth &
Anderson, Spokane, Wash.; "Spokane Count,y Ambient Air Profile", Jan. 1975,
Spokane County air Pollution Control Authority, Spokane, Wash.
2Hossler, Charles R., Low Level Inversion Frequency l n the Contiguous
United States: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 89, September 1971, op. 319-339.
13
Although the early morning inversions are frequent durinq the summer
manths, they are not as persistent as inversions occurring in the fall and
winter months. The data above indicates that a larqer part of these early
morning summer inversions have dissipated by 7 a.m., however, these inver-
sions often remain intact in the Spokane River Valley until noon or early
afternoon.
Federal standards have been set for six classes of primary air pollu-
tants: sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, photochemical
oxidants, hydrocarbons, and suspended particulates. The ambient concen-
trations of suspended particulates and carbon monoxide exceed both Washing-
ton State and f ederal standards in certain areas of Spokane County. These
two types of .pollutants have different origins and are, to a certain extent,
effected differently by meteorological and climatoTogical conditions.
Suspended particulates consist of any finely divided, solid or liquid
particles which remain suspended in the atmosphere for varyinq lenqths of
time. This category includes smoke and dust of various oriqins. Among the
nunerous sources of suspended particulates in the Spokane area are residen-
tial and commercial space heating, grain handling, mineral handlinq, indus-
trial processes, dust entrained in the air through vehicular traffic over
exposed ground, and agricultural and residential open burning. High levels
of suspended particuTates can aggrevate respiratory diseases (asthma, emphy-
sema, etc.) and result in excessive soiling of materials exposed to the at-
mosphe re. •
Table 2 summarizes the suspended particulate levels recorded on a
yearly basis at nine locations in Spokane County. The high volume particu-
late sampling locations are shown on Map 2. Federal primary standards re-
quire that by July l, 1975 the annual qeometric mean of ineasured suspended
particulate levels not exceed 75 mg/m3. Washing ton State standards limit
suspended particulate levels to 60 mg/m3 or 40 mg/m3 plus the level recorded
at the background station (Turnbull Wildlife Refuge), whichever is higher.
State and federal standards are exceeded in the industrial and commercial
areas on the Spokane Valley floor roughly between Brown's Addition on the
14
1 •
~
~
, ~ ►
. SUSPENDED PARTICULATES,
SAMPLING SITES _
ko,
, ~ a r
Iwr~.r ! ~ ~ ~
\JU`-~#~
1
1 d
f ~ i~• J
' v ~K~a i'~+ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R~% oad~ ~ ~
w ~ ~ 1 ~
i • ~ ~
q 1 ~ 1
r* • ti ~ ~ I j ~ i~y, ~ `,.~r+.r ..s~ ~ f+~~'; ~ , .
• , ~ n i ~ i a ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~
,
~
~„r'1 f
10.~ ~ i ~ ' J►IV~.•~r. ~
~ ~ OGEtS . ~ , ~ ,
Lo...~
. +~'i ~ • 4-
ofr I ~~~A1 ~AI.y
1 ~
, J ~ • ~ J~ _ '
Pr
~ • ~ '7 '
/1 61000,'J 41 a ; f 7 ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~
i
ANCHSJ:t
IF
l,~'~' F~~fA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ , ~ ~ tiv~..~ ~ i ~ ~ ~
~u ~FE~
~rt'► l p' ~ f~ ~ ~ , .►ys~.~ i
•1
I ,L~ ~ ; ~ ; 1 ( F
♦ ' C.. 1"` 1 ~ ~n~ 1 ' ,
-~~41 r'
~ ~
~ • ~I n ~
L
~
:
~ ~ r
i ~ i i ; ~i~'~1.avs.~ t.~
SAµPLING IOCA1 toNti
FEDEtAl- ST4COJua9:-.'
• cweNF-Y R ~ .
f'~ T!l~NP~Ur.I. ~i~ ; ~ , qQ~ EXCt~D'G STA~E 51A~DAQD
. . ~.w~
west and Vista Road on the east. Map 2 delineates the areas which may
reasonably be assumed to be exceeding state and f ederal standards ag uf
December, 1974.
Suspended particulate levels in the Spokane area have decreased over
the last several years th rough the control of open burning and stationary
sources. These control efforts have brought most residential areas of the
Valley floor within compliance of state and f ederal standards. Most sta-
tionary sources are presently in compliance with Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority regulations and further reductions in total suspended
particulates will require more stringent control of area sources.
TABLE 2
1972-1974 Suspended Particulate Summary
Annual Geometric Mean, Mq/m3
Station 1972 1973 1974
Turnbull 24.5 22.0 21.1
Rogers 83.3 67.0 55.1
City Hall 83.0 75.2 75 2
Gonzaga University 119.4 82.4 75.5
Freya and Ferry 128.6 87 1 90.0
Federal Sampler 122.6 118.5 74.9
Cheney City Hall 59.4
Plillwood 59.3
Fancher & Broadway .148.2
Carbon monoxide is the product of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels.
More than 90% of the carbon monoxide is generated by gasoline oowered motor
vehicles, with the remainder from residential, commercial, and industrial
heating and power generating units.
Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless gas. Extended exnosure to high
levels of carbon monoxide can be fatal. Exposure to smaller amounts can pro-
duce fatigue, headaches, confusion, and dizziness. Carbon monoxide combines
with the hemoglobin of the blood and inhibits the transfer of oxygen from the
lungs to body tissues. As a result, exposure to carbon monoxide will have a
16
relatively more significant effect on persons sufferinq from cardiovascular
or respiratory disease.
Stable meteorological conditions and the lack of horizontal dispersion
greatly abetts the accumulation of carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide levels
recorded in metropolitan Spokane show higher 8-hour carbon monoxide averages
during the fall and winter months. It is durinq these months that the in-
cidence of stable air and inversions are most frequent.
Federal ambient air standards require that carbon monoxide levels not
exceed 9 ppm for an 8-hour average more than once per year. This standard
is consistently exceeded within the Spokane Central Business District and
along the north Monroe and north Division Streets below the hill. The seven
carbon monoxide sampler locations are,for the most part, concentrated in the
central city, the one farthest east being located at Spraque and Thor. Dur-
ing the past two years, 8-hour carbon monoxide levels have exceeded 15 ppm
at these area stations. During 1973 the highest 8-hour average recorded was
22 ppm at Sprague and Wall on OctoSer 19, 1973. In 197a, the 8-hour carbon
monoxide levels reached 30 ppm at the Sprague and Wall, North Division, and
Monroe and Indiana stations on Qctober 18 1974, durinq the final month of
Expo '74. During the year of 1973, the 8-hour carbon monoxide standard was
exceeded on 132 separate days. This increased to 228 violation days in 1974.
A significant factor in this increase was the additional traffic generated by
Expo '74. The maximum 8-hour carbon monoxide level and the number of viola-
tion days for each station is shown in Tables 3 and 4
During the next several years the carbon monoxide levels are expected to
decrease as new vehicles with carbon monoxide control devices replace older
higher polluting vehicles. New car controls alone will not be sufficient to
bri ng carbon monoxi de 1 evel s wi thi n the federal standards as previ ous ly thought
because of hiqher than anticipated deterioration of the emission control de-
vices. Beyond this, additional decreases in carbon monoxide levels will depend
on the final form of the Transporation Control Strategy adopted for the area.
17
TABLE 3
Carbon Monoxide Summary
Year Max. 8 hr. Violation City Hall Number of Stations
Average Days Violation Days in Operation
1972 18 ppm 59 59 2
1973 22 ppm 131 30 2- entire year
1 - 11 months
1 - 9 months
2 - 3 months
1974 36 ppm 228 73 7
TABLE 4
Violation Days Max. 8 hr. Averaqe
Site 1973 1974 1973 1974
Dpm
Gonzaga 1 13 14 19
City Hall 30 73 18 17
Sprague #1 65a 70 22 31
Mbnroe & Indiana 67b 120 19 36
Division 19c 121 21 30
Spraque #2 3d 40
Trent • 130
aIn operation for 11 months.
• bIn operation for 9 months.
c In operation for 3 months.
dIn operation for 1 month.
In summary, there is little or no indication from existing data and/or
thoughtful speculation that would lead one to the conclusion that either
suspended particulates or CO exist at much more than very nominal levels in
the vicinity of the site. Meteoroloqical conditions and relatively few nearby
sources of these pollutants contribute to this fact.
18
Water
Runoff/Absorption
The extremely flat nature of the site precludes any notable runoff.
Most of the approximately 17 inches of annual rainfall is,therefore, dis-
posed of on the site. Since the site is currently covered with weeds, bunch
grass, etc , the average evapotranspiration is about 20 inches per year. Thus,
very little if any water is added to the groundwater supply through this site.
despite the rapid permeability of the soil.
Groundwater hlovement, Quality and Quantityl
The groundwater aquifer beneath the surface in the Spokane Vallev has
been and continues to be the subject of a great many investigations and
evaluations. A total discussion of this water resource would extend far be-
yond the scope of this report. Instead, the following comments related to
the subject matter a re offered below in order to provide a better understanding
and clarification of the groundwater situation.
The main aquifer of the Spokane Valley provides essentially the entire
domestic, industrial, and irrigation water supply for the Spokane urban area
Spokane is reportedly the largest city in the nation deriving its public
water supply entirely from groundwater sources. It has been andcontinues to
be of excellent quality and plentiful quantity, easily accessible by rela-
tively shallow wells.
A literature review of investigations and studies conducted by both
governmental agencies and individuals from the private sector are categorically
in agreement on most aspects of the aquifer. There is, however, a reasonable
amount of conflicting conclusions on other matters that seem to indicate, that
while a great deal is known about the aquifer, a great deal is also unknown
or undetermined at this point in time. For example, most studies aqree that
the origin of the aquifer is the Pend Oreille Lake area northeast of Spokane
iMost of this section is paraphrased from an excellently written section
on hydroloqy from the Draft EIS f or Sullivan Sand and Gravel Operation, Central
PreMix and Acme Concrete; Spokane County Planning Commission, January 1975
19
L- k., i iv:~ Jt~tL"t...., 0IV1Ji._1N - UNVi.1NU
WATER FLOV1,~ --.POKANE VALLEY
~
~
~
~ .1- No
o..f A ff,
M A p 3
(C ATNOL
I t ~ rr c ~
J r
TW/N' /S
_ )c,1~
~ c w fr e_,` /
2 )
11 If
0
~ ° p { J
2 .
~RATHDRUj1
3 ~ r l
N.a usSn
~ NC WNAN /~~n KE f
LAKQ ^ l~~ r1r ` t401 6
R A T N p A U M
AOII-Ar ~
PAA p~~ / ~ ~ Oik~ A P I► d/ R I!'
~~IIL C Yil
fvwoi~tc 1 l~n G~
~
r' f' O S T f A L L S ~
SPb)K A N E 4=CAV a
~ C U E tr,~l R D' A L E N E
S I O K .o N Q r~ ~
r1 ~ t
~ a1~ t, EsarY
lAK6
~
CO£Vp
VONAH ~ '1~ O ALCNQ
I/~AlR/E
I
o i r s . e
soact I/v witts
HILLYARU TROUGN
STATE LINE SEISMIC PROFIIE
r ~ ~ M SEISMIC PROFILE
n
looo
rAD,f /~\1el
~QLdC0dL I OLAGlA~-Y
; /I00 { 4 1 = iv.AT.~~► l~n~tL-~~y ~ ' '
~ • i~ t~~ i i• t~ ~1~ /dl/viAt OC~OSI/S ~ . r..~ ..r
-
~ ~ ~ y • r ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ r ~ r ~P i .i~ _
Y -r I •
~ -^I ~`r".~ J r f~~' ( \ il ~~t ~ . • ' : ~
w i e o o - - - ~ ~ d a . , ' . ' _ '
~ =+a ' ` `3
i rwrA 1. i%IVv.oriu~v
..c►c i
v -
t
; 4 ------i- L.rPf'.fow?v,orio7
owwAoirCwOCK mwa.virE woC~r ^I
: t 000
- - + ~ t + ; ~ ~
° e - - - - , - I~~I _ , ~ ~ i ~ - - -
t
J
b ~ •oo _ a - { --t'~7',_ t - i - ~ ' -
0 0 0 0 ~ D 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 C ~ ~ 0
~ 0 0 O ~ G C O 0 0 p 0 0 0 p 0
0 0 O 0 ~ 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 0 S d ,
ri • o ~ 4 ~ ~ n
.
♦ 0iS7,CNCC /N rClT /I►OM /ND7C4Tf0 -qC/!AlrNCr
r~
4
CITY P L A N COMMISSIOM
SO!/AC(~ !rlYFLr a~AXTON~ CONSULr/N~9 CNO/Nr~^1 ` 1~
S(/JMIC PAO/fLE OAra /T rAON iC/SM/f CT/39 fCGri~JNS SNOftAf~E , 1'J~1SFiI~~GTON
~
.~C~►0J9 TNE SPOK.eNC A/tCM V464EY Anp IIIC d-r/Ll ►'n,V 0 ~
TI7pUON /DaNO ANO W.qJN/NOTON OY M G NE10GONS
•NO OTNt/~! !l/ 9 Qs) N A Y / D f 4 I
, 20
in the Idaho panhandle, with a major contributinq branch from the Coeur d'Alene
Lake area, due east in northern Idaho. See Map 3. From there. the estimations
of the amounts and sources of water lose consistency. Most studies aqree that
the total flow of water is about 1,000 cfs, although this is disputed by others
as being conservative. In arriving at the 1.000 cfs estimate, it was con-
cl uded tha t over ha 1 f of th i s fl ow was deri ved f rom i nf i 1 trati on of s treams
draining onto the Valley floor and precipitation on the Valley floor. However,
this conclusion also is not consistent with other investigations. The available
data is generally in agreement on the relationship of the aquifer and the Spo-
kane Ri ver and th is subject is di scussed 1 ater.
The groundwater does have a westwardly movement and a seismic section at
about the I+Jashington/Idaho state line indicates a velocity of 90 5 ft./day
and in the Hillyard area, a velocity of 41.1 ft./day. (Map 2) Studies inves-
tigating the characteristics of this flow are lacking, although it is almost
a certainty that a stratified, unmixed situation exists. It is further specu-
lated that this accaunts for some of the inconsistency in water quality samples
Wells thraughout the area are withdrawing water at varying depths and are some-
what isolated from each other because of the lack of mixinq. Consequently,
one particular sample is more indicative of a specific area in, or level of,
the aquifer, rather than the entire aquifer.
It is apparent that the aquifer, because of its maqnitude, has an enor-
mous dilution capacity. To date, it has not been contaminated in detectahle
amounts even though numerous potentials for point source contamination exists.
These point source locations are in addition to literally unnumbered tens of
thousands of residences or individual septic systems or package sewaqe treat-
ment plants. Many variables provide a factor of safety which protect the
aquifer from contamination, but unfortunately, the extent and capability of
this safecty factor has not yet been accurately and/or completely identified.
The most complete and current study relating to the aquifer is the
Metropolitan Spokane Region Water Resources Study by the Corps of Enqineers,
U.S. Army. However, no specific conclusions regarding possible impacts on the
aquifer have been made as of Februar_y, 1975.
21
The Spokane River, approximately 1-1/2 miles north of the proposed project, Is
a non-navigable river1 with the following flo«s recorded at the Otis Orchard's
Gaging Station a few miles upstream. The figures are compiled from a 15 year
record.
Average maximum flow 27,673 cfs.
Average minimum flow 128 cfs.
Average fluctuation 10.5 cfs.
Minimum daily flow 61 cfs.
Maximum daily flow 50,100 cfs.
Throughout the course of the Spokane River in the Valley there is an
interplay of waters between the river and the groundwater. Most studies agree
that there is a significant inftiltration from the river to the groundwater
from the state line to about Greenacres. At this point, the gradient changes
and the g roundwater discharges into the river down to about Green Street in
Spokane. At this point, it again reverses and the river infiltrates to the
groundwater down to an area below the Spokane Falls in the heart of Spokane,
where the gradient again changes. As there is a considerable amount of fluc-
tuation in both the groundwater and river level elevations, it is reasonable
to anticipate that the interolay will be in bozh directions at these two point5
of change identitiea above. While this phenomenon plays an important role in
the discharge and recharge of the qrounda;aters, it is of virtually no signif-
icance In regards to the proposed Safeco project.
' Flora
Speci es 5]_gni fi cantl_y Affected
Since nearly all of the site will experience the impact of man's handi-
work, it is inevitable that flora will be affected. Construction, oaving and
landscaping will replace nearly all of the now existent veqetation, which
prima rily consists of blue bunch wheat qrass (Bromus tectorum), blue qrass
(Poa pratensis), a native wheat grass (Agropy ron spicatum spp• inerme) and
introduced crested wheat grass (A. cristatum). Abundant forbs include batchelor
button (Tragffoqon dubius), the thistle (Cirsium undulatum), and milkweed
(Asclepias speci,osaj.
1 Non-navigable does not include the numerous power and non-power small
pleasure boats which are commonly found on the river.
22
Endangered Species
None of the foregoing plants ar-A to be considered on the "endangered"
list.
Fauna •
Speci es Siqni fi cantl_y Affected
Short of periodic annual censuses over a period of a full year, one
cannot hope to describe specifically all the creatures prone to inhabit the
site. However, from the plant species, proximity of constant human activity
and general past animal observations of the east Valley area, one can qeneralize
about the fauna most likely to be found on the site.
The Columbia ground squirrel (Citellus columbianus) would appear to be a
prevalent creature. Occasionally seen on the site would be the striped
skunk (Mephetis mephetis), the deer mouse (Perom.yscus maniculatus), the common
house mouse (Mus musculus) dnd, occasionally, the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus).
Birds generally associated with this type of ground cover are those
ground-nesting birds native to such grasslands and birds of prey likely to
feed on the small rodents and insects of the site. Most prevalent of the
ground-nesting birds are the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), the
western meadow lark (Sturnella neqlecta), the horned lark (Eremoohila alpestris),
the morning dove (Zenaidura macroura), and the killdeer (Charadrius vociferus).
The birds of prey utilizing the site are probably the sparrow hawk (Falco spar-
verius) and occasionally the red-tailed hawk (Buteo 7amaicensis).
Endangered Species
None Tof the foregoing animals are to be considered on the "endangered"
list.
Noise
Existing noise at the site is generated by railroad and vehicular traffic.
The tracks of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company
23
pass directly to the south of the site. Railroad use is limited to reqularly
scheduled runs to Coeur d'Alene, Idaho and Metaline Fal1s, Washington as
follows:
TABLE 5
Train Traffi c on Mi lwaukee Road Tracks at
Adams Road Crossing (Times approximate)
Outbound from Inbound to
Spokane Spokane
Sunday 12:01 a.m.; 6:30 a.m. 4•45 p.m.
Monday 6:30 a.m. 12:01 a.m.; 4:45 p m.
Tuesday 12:01 a.m.; 6:30 a.m. 4:45 D.M.
Wednesday 6:30 a.m. 12:01 a.m.; 4:45 p.m.
Thursday 12•01 a.m.; 6•30 a.m. 4:45 p.m.
Friday 6:30 a.m. 12:01 a.m.; 4:45 p m.
Saturday 12:01 a.m.; 6:30 a.m. 4:45 p.m.
Additional noise impacts the site due to vehicular traffic on Soraque
Avenue to the north and Adams Road to the east. Below is shown the esti-
mated 1974 traffic levels in average daily trips (ADT)~.
FIGURE 1
950
10,160 • ~ f
\
~
Sprague Avenue
o ~9,950
Proposed Safeco Si te 11210 1974 Traffi c Fl ow
in ADT (estimated)
~
E
r~3
~
a
1 Spokane County Traffic Engineer.
24
i
I
~
7
~ ;W) ~ ~ ~
7~- . . ,
N c'l «f--
- „
l ~
F-F, Ak.x~ ' - ~
- - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ ~04~ - ~Fj~ a~ ~ ~
,
J ! ~
r
, .
~
4.~ 6
~ . . ~
- • ~ i - - - - Sp~.~.c=~~t=-_ ~Y'~~
,
~ . , ~
~
(07.1 ; 50' 50' 9 cib `
~1~ ~ 1 I 702' Ca~d ta
i ,
~
Irog' _ ~6dI5 -I~
r
S~,~L- C u ~ I T~
~
' - - - - _ _ - - - 3►,~' ~5d
~
` ' ~ ~ , ~v~j i ~
NOTL. P15 rANC.ET~ AFZ A.`'~ b1~ SC )2t.ZD F'-c ti\
FIGURE 2
Utilizing a noise methodology developed by Haworth and Anderson, Inc.
Spokane, Washington and Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California, existinq
noise levels on the site due to the previous traffic volumes are shown in
Figure 2. Table 6 follows and indicates recommended noise criteria for land
25
TABLE 6
Recommended Noise Criteria for Various Land Uses
Indoor Outdoor Noise Reduction
Land Use Easis of Criterion Criterion Criterion (PIP,) Requirzd
1 Residential Speech Interference 47 dQA 67 dBA 20 dBP, (1)
Annoyance 72 25 dBA (2)
Sleep Arousal
2. Commercial Speech Interference
P,etai 1 Stores 50 77 27
Res tauran t 65 77 12
hlotion Picture Theatre 47 17 30
3 Schools Speech Interfer2nce
Classroom 50-55 72 (3) 17_22
P,udi tori u;il 39 72 33
Library 65 72 7
4. Offices and Public
N 6uildings
°1 Board Roc,-is 50 71 (3) 27 (3)
Private 0`fices 60 71 (3) 17 (3)
Sales Offices 60 77 (3) 17 (3)
5. Outdoor Recreation Spec-ch Inter•ference Up to 77 (4)
(1) Based on 61 dBP,iorg range criterion
(2~ Eased on 72 oar', interim criterion
( 15~ Allowaale oLitdoor noise criterion may be hiyher if noise control procedures are employed
(4) Uoise control procedures may be required to provide this PJP, value
uses. The building set back for the Safeco structure is ovPr 95 feet from
the curb lane centerline of Adams. This will adequately mitigate anv ad-
verse effect of noise from Adams. Nowever, a Dortion of the building is
only about 80 feet from the curb lane centerline of Spraque, although the
bulk of the building averages approximately 140 feet from the centerline.
Portions of the building could possibly suffer some noise impact unless
appropriate design steps a re taken in the form of at least normal acoustical
insulation.
Land Use
Adjacent to the site and on its west side is the commercial outlet,
Mom's Mobile Homes. Across Sprague Avenue, north of the site is an area
of scattered residential uses, both single family and multifamily. North of
Sprague and east of Adams the uses are predominantly residential, although
characterized by limited density on Sprague AvenuP. Mostly commercial uses
exist on the south side of Sprague east of Adams. South of the site is the
single railroad track and beyond that is St. Mary's Rectory, Church and
School (grades 1 throuqh 8). South of the Milwaukee riqht of way exists
generally well developed residential areas. Adams Elementary School is at
8th Avenue and Adams and Central Valley High School rs at 8th Avenue 3nd
Sullivan Road. Generally the area between Sprague and the Milwaukee tracks
is going to commercial, industrial or office land uses for miles in either
direction from the project site.
Transportation and Circulation
Vehicular Transportation
Below (Table 7) is shown summarized f rom Figure 1 the 1974 traffic
counts at the Sprague-Adams intersection
TABLE 7
Traffic Counts - Sprague and Adams
Segment 1974 Average Daily Traffic Flow
Sprague -west of Adams 10,160 vehicles
Sprague - east of Adams 9,950 vehicles
Adams - north of Sprague 950 vehicles
Adams - south of Sprague 1,210 vehicles
27
The Spokane Transit System operates a regular bus service on East
Sprague. Route Number 9, East Sprague-Greenacres, operates past the site
with departure times from line terminations as indicated in Table 8.
TABLE 8
Spokane Transit System
E. Sprague Route Leaves E. Spraque-Greenacres Route
Downtown for E. Sprague- Leaves Appleway & Barker for
Greenacres Downtown
a.m. a.m.
Weekday Saturday l►leekday Saturday
6:20 6•25 7:00 7:00
7:40 7:40 7:20 8:15
8•55 8•55 8:15 9-45
10:25 10•25 9:45 11:15
11:55 11:55 11:15
p.m. p.m.
1•25 1:25 12:45 12:45
2:55 2:55 2:15 2:15
3:40 3•40 4:00 4:00
4:35 4:35 4•35 4:35
5:20 5:25 5:25
5:50 6:32
Local Service
Fi re
The site is afforded fire protection by Sookane Valley Fire Protection
District 1. The nearest fire station is located at Broadway Avenue and
Sullivan Road, approximately 2-1/2 to 3 minutes from the site. A hydrant is
located about 350 feet from the site at McCabe and Spraque, just east of
Adams. The fire district is considered a class A district and the covering
station contains a pumper and a ladder truck.
Police
The Spokane County Sheriff maintains from 4 to 6 cars in the Valley
24 hours a day. The response time to this centrally located site is esti-
mated by the Sheriff's Department as approximately averaging five minutes.
28
Regular prowl car movements include the three nearby schools and would
necessarily include movement on both Sprague and Adams.
Education
A limited discussion of educational facilities is in order due to the
proximity of the nearby school sites. Adams is a primary walking and vehicu-
lar route to both Adams Elementary School as well as St. Mary's (parochial)
School. Minor traffic due to Central Valley High School students and faculty
exists on Adams and Spraque.
Adams School's northern jurisdiction boundary is Sprague Ave. and a school
administrator estimates only four children may be walking on Adams north
of the railroad track. The school's hours have children arriving between
8:0G and 8:30 a.m. and leaving between 2:45 and 3:30 p.m.
St. Mary's school does draw some students from north of Sprague,
many of whom cross at the light on Adams and walk past the site of the pro-
posed project. However, the school hours are such that walking traffic is
from 8:30-9:00 a.m. and from 3:00-3:30 p.m.
EnercLy
Source/Availabilit_y
Oil, if desirable, may be supplied by any of the numerous local private
suppliers. Washington'blater Power is the onlv supplier of natural gas to
the project site area. At the present time, and for the foreseeable future,
it could supply gas on a non-interruptable basis. The nearest source is gas
supply lines on the south side of Sorague and a stub line on the Adams Road
right of way, extending about 200 feet south of Spraque.
Electricity is provided by the Vera Water and Power Comnany. The company
has at this time virtually an unlimited reserve of electric power available
for commercial utilization.
29
Utilities
Energy
Energy in the form of natural qas and electricity is available as
described above.
Water
14ater is to be provided by the Vera water and Power Company Two 8"
lines exist under Sprague and one 8" line beneath Adams. There is no ac-
cessible irriqation water, so the regular domestic water supply must be
used for such a purpose. Recently a new 500,000 gallon storage tank vias
completed to the south of the site. There is, therefore, adequate pressure
to provide the project with all necessary water and pressure.
a
Sewe r
It is common knowledge that little, if any at all, of the Ualley is
sewered. The proposed site is certainly no exception. A comprehensive
sewer plan is not availabie, so it is even unreasonable to suqqest that
sewer hook-ups could be established for purposes of eventual hookup to
sewer lines. Sewage must thus be disposed of on the site.
Storm Water
All storm water is currently disposed of on the site, primarily through
absorption into the soil to become part of the groundwater system. There
exists no storm sewer system.
Solid Waste
Solid waste disposal is available only from private contractors, two of
whi ch are based i n the I►al 1 ev and whi ch qeneral ly pravide waste di snosal
service to "alley homes and businesses Both food related qarbage and office
operation waste could be handled on a daily basis. Disoosal is at the land
fill at the h9ica DYSposal Site.
Telephone
Telephone serviGe is readily available and is provided by Pacific North-
west Bell. Underground cable in the Spraque Avenue riqht of way will be the
source of telephone service.
30
Aesthetics
Concerning the vacant land now existing at the site, it may be said
only that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. To some persons the vacant
landscape is an asset, worthy of preserving in and of itself. On the other-
hand, to some persons anything not g rowing or existing in an orderly fashion
is not thought of as aesthetically pleasing. Generally speaking, the eye
rel i ef provi ded by the 1 ac-k ofi deve 1 ooment i n an a ree ofi Leri clesc.ribed as a
menagerie of signs, diffe rinq store f ronts and parking lots full of cars, is
pleasant. On still another hand, with limited requlatory design controls,
one could be concerned with the potential prosoect for any development.
A pleasant well-landscaped site could be counted as an asset, along u-rith any
well designed building
Archaeological/Historica]
There is no location on the site +-ihich has any historical or archaeo-
loqical significance. At least, there is none known One can never make
such a statement until an archaeological search has been conducted. Hol-rPver,
lacking a skillful on-site exam7nation, the presence of two items may be thought
of as suggesting the potential for a"find". Respectively, the presence of
an established sprinq or a substantial amount of caves, usually suqgest the
benefit to be gained f rom excavating. Since the site contains none, it seems
unlikely that any site of historical/archaeoloqical siqnificance would be
present. '
31
THE EtIUIRONMEPITAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Earth
Soils
The project will disturb the existing ground cover and oossibly set
the stage for limited erosion, particularly if a rainy period hits the
area during construction. Dust during construction is more likely to be a
bigger nuisance, unless dust control measures are utilized.
Currently the site acts as a universally equal recinient of pre-
cipitation. After construction the parking lot, building coveraqe and
earth mounding will prolilbit uniform saturation of the qround. However,
formation of puddles, etc., is unlikely to occur because of the very good
drainage characteristics of the soil. In addition to encouraqing rapid ab-
sorption of precipitation, the low holding capacity of the soil will maxi-
mize the effectiveness of the sewage plant's drain field. The gravel/sand
composition of the soil will act as a good natural filter for the effluent,
as it recharges the aquifer.
Air
Air Quality
The ambient air quality is relatively hiqh as described under Existing
Conditions. The facilitv is scheduled for electric power usage with a oossible
cons iderati on for gas at a future date. The el ectri c Power usaqe wi 11 nnt
adversely impact the air quality at the site location. If gas is adopted for
utilization at a later date, any emissions will be controlled and regulated
by the appropriate air pollution control agency. It is, therefore judged
that any air pollution resulting from the heating plant will be neqligible.
During construction it is most likely that an increase in suspended par-
ticulates will occur due to surface excavations. This may praduce some dis-
comfort in the immediate vicinit_y. However, ambient conditions are of rela-
I'?
tively high quality and all but "immediate vicinity" impact will be negli-
gible as natural mixing takes place.
Appendix A. the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority's review
of the complex source permit, addresses itself in detail to the project im-
pact on existing carbon monoxide levels. It finds that the Safeco
Office 6uilding and pa rking lot which will be constructed will not
result in ambient carbon monoxide standards being exceeded in the area."
The Authority found that " . . the 8-hour average carbon monoxide standard
of 9ppm is not being exceeded in the arEa and (that the) preliminary deter-
mination indicates that the actual operation of the complex source would not
cause the ambient carbon monoxide standard to be exceeded."I
Continuing from the above review:
Carbon monoxide monitoring has not been conducted in this
area. However, based on existing traffic f1ow and data from
other carbon monoxide monitoring stations, it is estimated
that the background carbon monoxide levels in this area do
not exceed 4 ppm. This is well below the Federai ambient
air standard of 9 ppm carbon monoxide.
The impact of the facility on ambient carbon monoxide
levels was modeied for the year 1976 as well as for 1981 and
1986 when expansion is pro,jected. Our review indicated that
under worst case conditions, the ambient carbon monoxide levels
will be highest in 1976. The carbon monoxide levels reduce in
subsequent years due to the Federal motor vehicle emission pro-
gram that requi res carbon monoxide control s on ne4v cars.
The maximum carbon monoxide impact was deteri>»ned to be in
the vicinity of the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Adams
Road. There ar~ several single family residences in this area.
At this intersection the carbon monoxide concentration i,ras es-
timated to be 6 ppm in 1976 under worst case meteoroloqical con-
ditions. The carbon monoxide level dropned to 5.4 ppm in 1981
and 4.1 ppm in 1986 This was estimated using existinq carbon
monoxide background dat~ and the Department of Ecology ]ine
source diffusion model
I "Public Notice - Complex Source Reviews", Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority.
2"Preliminary Determination of Safeco Office Building Complex Source
Review", memo to the file, 2/15/75, Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authority
33
Water
Runoff/Absorption
Absorption of a portion of the 17" annual rainfall will occur.~
The water falling on the paved areas and on the building roof will be routed
to on-site drywells. Once in the drywells, fairly rapid absorption in the
gravel/sand soil will occur. This will serve to recharqe the aquifer, a '
condition not currently happening. The natural filtering of the soil will
adequately act to remove the suspended matter which the water has plcked up.
, Groundwater Movement, Qua]ity and Quantity
Although it cannot be denied that the potential exists to adversely
affect,the aquifer previously described, thus far even the cumulative impact
of hundreds of sources of e ffluent appear to have done no calculable damage.
As more study and investigations proceed, it is assumed that regular moni-
toring will give sufficient warning to any increasing levels of contaminants.
At such time that dangerous levels are detected, mitigating actions throuqh
the Valley will have to be taken to abate the sources of contaminants. Even-
tually complete sewering of the Valley must be considered.
In the meantime, the Spokane County Health District and the Department
of Ecology are satisfied with the steps taken to make the drainfield effluent
acceptable. Safeco must certainly be prepared to provide outstandinq and con-
scientious attention to the maintenancg and operation of the package plant,
and must ultimately be'willing to share in the costs of a sewaqe system.
Appendix B provides detailed data concerninq the sewage qlant desiqn
Two topics concerning the sewage plant deserve some comment. The first
is that the current plans include an auxiliary power system for the otherwise
electrically powered plant. This will provide the emergency power necessary
to operate the plant in the event of a power failure, thus assuring that the
bacteria balance will not be upset with its resulting odor.
iRecall that the 20" annual evapotranspiration creates a net loss situ-
ation for water on the existing site.
34
The second point concerns adequate operation and maintenance of the
plant. The plant specified in Appendix B is more than adequate to handle the
needs of Safeco, if properly operated and maintained. The Department of
Ecology has expressed certain general apprehensions with package Dlants.
Fully recognizing that the effluent f rom a proper operated and maintained
package plant is totally acceptable, depending on existing soil conditions,
the agency can state numerous cases in the Spokane Valley in which neqlect
has caused plant failure and resulted in inconvenience and nuisance to
,
many people.I Therefore, we cannot too strongly stress the critical asoect
of flawless opera tion an d maintenance or the part of Safeco.
F1 ora
Species Significantly Affected
The potentially significantly affected plants, earlier described,will
disappear from the natural habitat and will no longer occupy their position
in the food chain in this immediate area. Their loss will probably not be
directly noticed, and in fact may be applauded by some The greatest impact
will be on the limited number of fauna which depend on the flora for shelter
and food.
Fauna
SpeciFs Significantly Affected
The species previously identified and actually existing as residents
of the site will be forced to relocate. The principals of territorial im-
perative and adequate food supply suqgest that they may have difficultv
being absorbed nearby and may be expected to migrate further than "iust
across the street". However, there is little doubt that miqration and re-
settlement will ultimately take place. Construction will beqin in late sum-
mer or fall. Consequently, most or all of the young of a qiven species will
have left the nest or "birth habitat", and wil] therehy be capable of a mi-
gration.
1 Numeraus discussions between Thomas G. Mosher, Haviorth and Anderson, Inc.,
and the staff of the Department of Ecology.
35
Noise
Noise impact as a result of the project will be two-fold. There will
be a temporary presence of some noise due to construction equipment. As
the building becomes functional there will be some increased noise due to
the traffic generated by Safeco's regular staff.
In regard to the first, minimum excavation is anticiDated due to the
fact that construction below grade will be limited. Site qradinq will not
be too extensive, although one earth moving pan and one bulldozer will be
required to achieve parking lot drainage and the earth berms.
Construction of the building will not be excessively noisv, due to the nature
of the construction, primarily precast concrete panels. These panels will
require a crane for installation, and probably one or two compressors--one
possibly for touch-up sand blastinq and another for weldinq equiDment pur-
poses. Furthermore, diesel trucks will be used to haul fill dirt to the site
fvr the earth berms. The barrow area is a contractor option and has not
yet been discussed.
Noise due to the diesel motors can be exoected to be similar to that
depicted in Chart l, dependinq on proximity of the observer, i.e , from
59dB to 95dB, with most of it beinq between 65dB and 77d6 (an anaroximate
distance of 300 feet to an observer). Such levels may be expected to qenerate
a low level of complaints. Chart 2 suqqests such action is possible.
The second imoact due to noise is also of limited consequences, even
when compared to the existing relatively low level environmental noise
background. For the purposes of noise impact analysis, a"worst case" situ-
ation for 1986 will be examined, including the consequences of figuring the
additional load of Safeco employees added to the expected normal increase in
traffic.
As taken from page C-4 of this assessment, traffic generation is an-
ticipated to be as shown in Table 9. Although some will approach the site
36
r
YdY~
e5
~r
~
p1
o`~ ~MQ
,
►
L,
o iaC
ri _
CIF
4 r_\1~L ~
• •
kj s ✓
• ' ~ U
, ,C,~ J r . ~ • ' 1
~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ • , ~
r ,
r , ` 4`~'~' y ~ y{ ^ ~
n ~ ~ ~ • " 1 1 _,^~-'".-r~ i r j V , " ~ y\ ` ' F ~ ` { •
~ • L~~ t ~ ~ • ~ ~r„' ~ ~ ; i ;
'r' ~ ~ "7 "'J~ ~ ` ~,.~r~`~,,,. ` . ` ~ ..r„~, _ ~y ` {
✓ t ~ ' '
r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ` f ' j ~ , ~r~ ~ f + 1
C ~ ~ ` ~ ~ " ~ : ` ~ ' 4~ ~
~ . G N,
.r• - , . ` ~ ,
; rT
~
: r,, rn . ~ . .
-
v - `
4..
~,~~~L~~~
► ~ 4CO
4 r 4J, ~ O
7 ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ t
2~00 .
~ I ► ~r
, lJo
~ ► ~J 0
r
I ~Q ~p ~ ~ ~ -ti
~ ~o , ~-,D Gr 0
w Go C p('~
G ",1
7
7
113
P~
J
I -
,
' CNAC~~ ~ .
s
~
~ c; t3 A
.
so _
,
LO CAL C 0:11 iV! 1TEt ACTI V I i`( WI"i H
1NFLUEiV"" I AL 0R LE^vAL AC I 10N
i ~
~
f'Ei iT10N Gs= Pf:OTES f
• urfo
~ LET i ERS Or F^0 i EST
~ COMPLA►! N"i S L IK`LY
CONIPLAi NTS PQSS { RLE _
r ~ ~ ~ ~ • • ~ in ~r r.~ ~ w. w .r~ r~ ~ ~.w~ r ~ r~ ~ ~ ~
~ •
I . . C OMPL AiiV I S RARi
~
60 ~ aCCEPi AiVCE
i
-
~
,
~ -
J O
~ TIRENi~ OF :~UBL~~ RE1-~CTI0~~ ~'O PEAK NOISE
a
NEl1~ RF-Si DENCl:.:~
~
SOUrCC: i C'.iLc~tt~ .7~,hn T.. .'iTICl ii~'f,,'~ , I.~~t]1C, ~~C.lil Ti.~~~l~ltlOil 1 ~1~IR ~
7il' RCdUCCtI i)% i)l:`•3.o 11~~~ 1`' R, "0 t1Cl1 R~o! l,ld VO1 Z 32~
~
38
from the south on Adams, for worst case circumstances it is assumed all
traffic will pass throuqh the intersection of Sprague and Adams
TABLE 9
Projected Business Day Vehcile Parking Lot
Ingresses and Egresses - Automobiles
Year 1976 1981 1986 1991
Tot. Cars 403 613 818 1063
From page C-9 of Appendix C, Application for Review of a Complex
Source, the average daily traffic volumes are distributed as follows and
have a resulting distribution ratio as shown. Applying the distribution
TABLE 10
Projected Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Sprague Avenue and Adams Road
1986 (without Safeco)
Segment Volume ADT ! of total
E. Spraque 15,930 44.7
W. Sprague 16,266 45.6
N. Adams 19521 4.3
S. Adams 1,937 5.4
All Segments 359654 100.0
ratios of Table 10 to the 1986 traffic generation figure of 818 as shown
in Table 9, the total projected 1986 traffic fiqures are as folloi-rs in
Table 11, for the Sprague/Adams intersection.
~
TABLE 11
Estimated Daily Traffic Volumes
Spraque Avenue and Adams Road
(with Safeco)
' Segment Volume ADT % of total
E. Sprague 16,296 44.7
W. SDraque 169639 45.6
N Adams 19556 4.3
~ S. Adams 19981 5.4
Al1 Segments 36,472 100.0
~ 39
4 1 1
I ~
j L -I ~T) ~
~ , , ; ►
U'N
.
kc) (j - ~ - - - - - ~ Q : - ~ - - - - - - - ~ ~
~ • ~ ~ ,
~ . ~
5~~F3 2.~5 , - - _ ~ i I ~Z~ ` ~b Y ;
~
_ _ t fif4;:~ ~ ; ~ ' , - ~:~2~ ~
;
f
~
~..~•..,.a . + , . ~ . S. ~ ,~.o.~. ~ ~ r , , ~
-64.1r6~-
~ ; .
,
C` ~N f~Lc.c.a S IrE--~ ~ .
~
,
~
,
~ ~ ~ - -
~
i
~f~ t'~. ~ D 1 S i i~ o~lC t<< A S r~'i uZi_° F~? t~~, W I,b
FIGURE 3
,
Again utilizing the methodoloqy for noise analysis used for existing
traffic (fiqures 1 and 2), the resultinq noise ievels in decibels are in-
dicated diagramatically on figure 3. A comparison of figures 2 and 3 shows
that noise levels will actually decline, even though traffic increases. ThiS
is, of course, due to the fact that technological advances and noise control
regulations will have a combined result of quieter vehicles.
40
Land Use
The only land use impact that is certain to occur is the conversion
of vacant land to an office type use. This particular use will not serve
as a traffic generator in the sense of a retail establishment and should
thus not be classified as a use contributinq to the daily traffic conqes-
tion. The hours of use are such that no conflict with nearby school
uses is anticipated. Additionally traffic to and from this site will be
in opposition to much of the area rush hour traffic, thereby not contribu-
ting significantly to the community trafific.
The Administrator of St. Mary's School expressed relief that the
usage was not of a commercial nature. If it were, it would not only
notably physically endanger the students due to increased day time traffic,
but would also provide a loitering place and a potential discipline nrohlem.~
Whether this new land use will spark a major trend shift for the area is
difficult to predict. Although land use patterns do tend to follow a"trend-
setting" example such as Safeco, it remains to be seen if this will be the
case in the east Valley area.
Transportation and Circulation
The increase in vehictilar traffic due to the office establishment has
been projected previously in Table 9. These are the fiqures used and accepted
by the Air Pollution Control Authority and the Department of Ecology in their
review of this as a complex source. The basic assumptions used in generating
these figures tend to probably make them on the large side ? Any increase over
current trends in carpooling, transit use, bike or motorcycle riding would
reduce these numbers. Furthermore, employees who can be discouraged from
leaving the premise for lunch will additionally reduce these vehicular use
projections. A full food service cafeteria is expected to accomplish this
for the most part.
1 Interview with administrator of St. ^lary's by Thomas G. Plosher of
Haworth and Anderson, Inc.
2See Appendix C, page C-5.
41
I The intersection at Sprague and Adams is signaled at the present time
with left turn channelization from both directions on Sprague Avenue.
Safeco will execute nume rous circulation improvPments Sidewalks will be
installed along Sprague Avenue and walks and curbing along south Adams and
curbing on a new Second Avenue, south of the site. fhis new Second Avenue
is to be dedicated and improved by Safeco as is a portion of South Adams.
Generally, concerning Safeco's employee policy in regards to trans-
portation, the company has an established policy of encouraging car pooling,
use of public transportation, etc. to reduce dependence on the automobile.
Related to this is the fact that this facility will receive very few visitors
and require a negligible number of trips wherefn an employee will leave the
site during the working day.
Local Services
Fi re
Except in the event of a fire in the structure, the local fire depart-
ment should feel no impact. The building is designed with modern fire
protection and warning systems. The basement mechanical equipment room is
sprinklered; the rest of the building is not, and is consequently in code
conformance by the number and size of the openings in the exterior wall.1
Police •
The building is so located as to be on the regular routes of cruising
sheriff cars. Since few valuables canable of being easily removed or easily
disposed of after theft will be common in the buildinq, the building will
probably be the source of limited calls to the sheriff
Education
As earlier mentioned, the office hours do not coincide with those of
the nearby schools. Consequently, no conflict with existing school opera-
tions is anticipated.
1 See additional comments under a later section, "Adverse Impacts Which
Miay be Mi tigated" .
42
To the extent that Safeco may have programs to encourage employees to
upgrade their education and/or skills, there might be a small additional
burden on local post high school institutions to accomodate such a demand.
Enerqy
Source/Availability
Presently and in the foreseeable future, electric power will not be a
problem, hence the impact of the project is negligible upon the availability
of power. Well over 95% of local electric power is produced hydroelectrically,
and this appears to be the clearest reason for its prospects of continued
good supply.
The building deserves note because of the fact that its desiqners have
approached energy conservation from both ends. The efforts have achieved
a situation in which ahout 112 as much energy per square foot will be re-
quired to maintain this building as to maintain an office such as Washinq-
ton Mutual's downtown building. This is achieved by a low proportion of
exterior wall glass and thus, a relatively hiqh coefficient of insulation.
The mechanical system uses a heat recovery system capable of conserving
about 300,000 KWH per year. The total annual load is estimated to be 3,303,000 KWH, with a peak load of about 333,000 KW. A capability to switch to qas at
the end of five and ten years is designed into the plant, and such a decision
will be so evaluated.
Furthermore, the lighting system is designed so that the three lamp,
30" X 30" fixture can be operated on l, 2, or 3 lamps. This flexibility
provides liqhting levels varying from 60-120 footcandles, resulting in energy ,
conservation flexibility.
Utilities
Enerqy/Water
Electricity and water appear to be the two utilities available in
abundant quantities. Their availability to the rest of the community will
remain unaffected by Safeco's demand.
43
Sewer
The fact that a sewage treatment plant will be utilized has been dis-
cussed earlier. Its impact on the environment has been mentioned also.
Suffice it to say that if properly operated and maintained, no environ-
mental imbalance will occur.1 The auxiliary power generator will cover
this package plant in the event of a power failure.
Storm Water
Due to the channeling of storm water into dry wells, recharge of the
aquifer will take place where little or none nbw occurs. Current loss due
to evapotranspiration exceeds annual rainfall, thus establishing a current
net loss situation.
Sol i d blaste
Solid waste will be hauled away reqularly and disposed of at the
Mica Land Fill. This certainly contributes to our general societal problem
of solid waste disposal. The waste will include the organic material from the
kitchen as well as the normal inorganic materials from an office operation.
Aesthetics
Although a photog raph of the proposed build7ng is not readily available
and would be of limited use for details, the building and landscaping wi11
be of commendable quality. The sign on the north portion of the property,
fronting on Sprague, is to be of a low profile and tastefully executed, as
earlier described under the project description section of this assessment.
The generally low profile of the b uilding will be softened even more by the berm
landscaping and rather extensive mixed planting of trees and shrubs.
iConcerning this aspect of proper maintenance and oneration, Anpendix
D contains a letter explaining the reduced level nf plant operation to be
maintained durinq the earlier phases of the plant operation that prior to
handling the full design capacity of waste.
a4
THE RELATIOPdSHIP BETWEEPJ LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES
OF MAN' S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND
ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERh1 PRODUCTIVITY
In view of the uncertain future of a site such as this in tfie event
that the Safeco project does not occur, it is difficult to speculate whether
a Safeco use would have a better or worse "short-term use/lonq-term produc-
tivity" relationship than some other project. Assuming a fifty to seventy
five year project life, the community/societal advantages of employment,
economics, money circulation, etc., go a long way toward justifying this
utilization of man's environment. The trade-offs in the environmental
area seem to not be too harsh. The project cannot be critiEized for any
violations of current or foreseeable environmental standaa^ds. In the long
run the release of the sewage plant effluent may, when combined with all
other effluent releases, result in some degree of contamination of Spokane's
water supply. But close monitoring of water quality would make such an
occurence unlikely. It is generally accepted that sewering of the Valley
may be necessary and that increased monitoring and treatrnent of the Spokane
domestic water supply may become necessary for at least an interim period of
time.
It can be rather successfully argued that any improvement on the site
would have a positive societal impact. One of continuinq environmental
quality would be an asset for years to come.
GROWTH-INDUCIPJr, IMPACTS
One of Safeco's reasons for locating in Spokane, and particularly in
the Ualley, is because of the real and/or potential labor market existing
in the area. They feel that the presence of their facility will be nar-
tially responsible for many women entering the labor market to sDecifically
seek employment with them. Numerous persons will obviously come from un-
employment roles and others will change jobs the net result being
a fuller area wide employment rate due directly and indirectly to Safeco.
Some key persons will be imported to the area b,y Safeco and to this extent
the project will be directly growth-inducing. However, for the most part,
^r
growth-inducement must be cateqorized as indirect. More jobs mean a larqer
community income level, vihich translates into a calculable increase in de-
mand for goods and services. This stimulates the chain reaction vjhich is
usually, in itself, described as growth.
In another respect, the tax revenues generated by the facility will
add to the coffers of the county and various special district qovernments.
This will allow a proportionate growth or expansion on their part.I Hrnw-
ever, as is increasingly the case, tax revenues may continue to fall short of
government exnenditures.
The previously mentioned factors, while difficult to quantify, are
nonetheless real. A more significant result of any growth inducement may
well be the stimulation of a trend in the east Valley toward this kind of
development. This could include not only other regional, divisional,
and home office operations, but business and services to support them.
IRREUERSIQLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE COMPIITPIENTS OF RESOURCES
Numerous tynes and kinds of raw materials in varying quantities will
be used to produce this structure. These are common place buildinq
materials, such as steel, concrete, glass, aluminum, tile, paints, etc.
Quantities of raw materials necessary to produce a finished product is
what is identified as an irreversible or irretrievable resource commitment.
From a daily on-going viewpoint, the consumption of irreplaceable re-
sources appears fairly good. Water is, of course, al1 eventually recycled.
Fuel at this point will be electricitv and nearly all of the area's power
is hydroelectrically generated. This, of course, involves no direct utili-
zation of a raw material, such as atomic fuels or fossil fuels. The gener-
ating water is simply recycled for additional use through the precioitation/
evaporation system
Additionally, during the life of the project, the land must be considered
as irretrievable.
I See the later section, "Social? Economic and Cultural Issues", for an
approximation of annual tax revenues.
ADVERSE IMPACTS b1HICH MAY BE MITIGATED
On the assumption that dust gene rated by the construction will consti-
tute a suspended particulate problem, all efforts to apply dust control
measures should be employed.
In order to keep empl oyee aiitomobi 1 e gerierated carbon mvnoxide and other
emissions to a minimum, every inducement possible should be considered by
Safeco to reduce such emissions. This includes such steps as car Qooling,
increased transit ridership, and bicycling, etc.
In order to maintain the absolute highest quality of effluent from
the on-site sewage plant, almost daily attention must be given to the plant
by someone qualified to detect the slightest malfunction. This is the single
most important step which Safeco can take to prevent environmental damage
to the aquifer. A malfunction may also be the single most critical noten-
tial source of complaints from the surrounding residents, businesses, schools,
etc. An operational failure can result in obnoxious odors, certain to
generate complaints and criticism.
In the area of noise production, adequately muffled construction equip-
ment is necessary to ensure that the programs at St. f'lary's School will not
be disrupted. Concerning the facility operation on a continuing basis, in-
crease transit use, car pooling and bicycles will reduce the ner capita noise
produced with trips to and from work.
General reduction in traffic as suggested/described above vrill further
help control traffic congestion to some extent, which may otherwise result from
the project's realization.
In the area of fire prevention, it is unnecessa ry to restate the con-
tinual, if not growingg controversial issue of "sprinkle verses non-sprinkle".
Although the proposed project certainly conforms to code by way of 20 snuare
feet of access every 50 lineal foot of exterior wall, there are those in the
.
47
fire fighting profession who, nonetheless, advocate the sprinklers provide
the only adequate early protection for an undetected fire. Such sprinkler
systems can also trigger an alarm system, speeding fire fighting equipment
to the scene.I
ALTERNATIUES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Considerably in advance of the dec;sion to locate on East Sprague,
Safeco investigated and studied many sites from which they could serve the
Inl and Northwest of central/eastern Glashi ngton, ^1ontana and Idaho. Spokan°
was decided upon for numerous reasons associated with the oaeration of the
insurance business.
Within the Spokane area, various sites were examined and this alternative
selected for its size, zoning, and proximity to a potential labor pool, simi-
lar to those locational factors utilized in locating other division offices.
The design process has incorporated in it the consideration and selection of
various actions to mitigate potential environmental impacts (as previously dis-
cussed in this assessment).
A"no action" alternative would certainly ensure no adverse environmental
impact. On the other hand, such an alternative leaves open for speculation
what might be the even'tual fate of a site zoned for commercial uses.
I Safeco's architects, Walker/McGough/Foltz/Lyerla, have updated the
information heretofore available to Haworth and Anderson, Inc. in regards
to fire detection. It is as follows and appears to be more than adequate.
The auxilliary power system will operate the detection/alarm system in the
event of a power failure. The typical "break glass" red boxes will exist,
triggering internal bell alarms, and exterior sirens. Neat detectors will
be located in all unoccupied rooms. Smoke detectors will be located in all
stair areas and in supply and return air ducts. All of these will activate
the same bell/siren system. It will be Safeco's option to have these sys-
tems tied to a direct alarm network in the nearby firehouse. To mitigate
a potential fire's impact on human and environmental networks, such a hook-
up is to be encouraged.
48
UNAVOIDABLE ADUERSE IMPACTS
Numerous adverse and potentially adverse impacts were earlier discussed.
In some cases, the necessary mitiqating steps have been taken and in others
the steps are scheduled for implementation. The net result is that the pro-
ject has no identifiable adverse impacts of any consequence.
The fact that the county has never initiated the sewerinq of the Valley,
thereby setting the stage for a direct or even a planned sewer hookup to a
refined system, may rank as the mos t obvious potential adverse impact. Safeco
is certainly doing all that is possible and practical, under the existinq
conditions, to adequately handle its waste problems.
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AtID CULTURAL ISSUES
The project as heretofore discussed raises no unfavorable social, eco-
nomic or cultural issues. It likewise is apparent that the pro7ect will not
overtly positively stimulate any social, economic or cultural activities,
except in the area of economic considerations. From the economic standpoint,
the addition of jobs, increased money circu]ation from an outside source, sup- '
portive services, etc., in a basically non-polluting fashion, is a decided
bAnus for the community as a whole.
On the basis of current millage levels, the approximately $2.25 million
building will gene rate an estimated $47,707 in annual revenues.1 These would
be distributed as follows:
$ 109012.50 Washington State (for schools)
39370.75 Spokane County (general purpose)
59062.50 Spokane County (for roads)
225482.00 S.D. 356 (Central Valley)
19125.00 Rural Library System
59654.25 Fire District 1(Spokane Valley)
$ 47,707.00
~1975 rate = $21.692/$1,000 of assessed value.
49
!~1
APPENDIX A
COMPLEX SOURCE REVIEW
for
SAFECO INSURANCE C0MPANY
D,IVISION OFFICE
by
Spokane Cwnty Air Pollution Control Authority
Al~ ~'o~.LUTIOPJ CONTRUL aH~~'HOr6~'Y
!~ro~cnt;f
GOUtITY
PUBI,IC NOTICE - COMPLEX SOURC'E REVIEW5
Notice is hereby given that the Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authority has made a preliminary determination that th2 SdfeCO
Office Building and parking lot
which wiii be constructed at the southwest corner of the intersection
of Sprague and Adams Road
, ►
will not result in ambient carbon monoxide standards being exceeded
in the area.
The 8-hour average carbon monoxide standarcl of 9 ppm is not being
exceeded in the area and our preliminary determxnation indicates
that tne actua], operation of the complex source would not cause the
ambient carbon monoxide standard to be exceeded.
This facility would not intorfere with parking management programs
which have a yoal of reducing vehicle miles traveled in the Spokane
Central Business District.
This preliminary determination and all supporting information are
available for public inspection at the spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority offxces at North 611 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on regular business days.
Interested persons may submit data, views, or comments in writing
to this agency prior to Ma rc S .
r
Fred A. Sha.osaki, Director
t
Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority
. ,
:mc °
ADDRE55 REPI.Y TO SPQKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
NORTH 811 ,1EFFERSON SPOKANE, WASNIfVGTON 99201
n I
I
1 1 \
I '
~
w~
1 g q
d, ,r,r'~►~~ t~
"'P
, I.rV.r. r
„
~
Ll u
C j., ,1'
COLMPLEX 50URCE REVIEW
ESTIMAVtD CAR30N NONOXIDE COyCENTRAT1GyS
l. Receptor; Single famiiy residence at the intersection of Spraque Avenue
and Adams Road
2. Estimated Carbon Monoxide Concentrations:
A. Genoral Urban Background: 4•0 Ma,Co
y~
B. Increase in Urban Background Caused by
Complex Source: t10t S1qt11f1Cdnt
C. Carbon Monoxide Generated by Vehicula-r .
Traffzc in Vicinity of Complex Source: 2.0
D. iotal Estzmated Carbon Monoxide at the
Recept.or: 6.0 ,Y., Co
M
3. Summa rf :
The above estimate 7s'fo r 1976. The carbon monoxide tevels projected
in 1981 and 1986 are as follows:
Background Traffi c GeneraLion Total CO pom
1981 4.0 1.4 5.4
1936 3.0 1.1 4.1
q_2
--^~-~,r rnt t iiTi~v r'nNTRnt /1UTHORtTY
i
I t
C ~IJP f''~ R~~OP~^jw
ri)
V L
' r I
~ L _`r/
I I uX. I Y
i )
i
MEMO T0: The File
FROM: Jim Frank, Air Quality Engineer
DA i E: February 15, 1975
SUBJECT: PRELIMINPRY DETERMINATION 0r SAFECO OFFICE BUILDING
COMPLEX SOURCE REVIEW
ihe review of the application for construction of a complex source
subr►» tted by Paul Clausen on behlaf of Safieco, Inc., has been completed.
The project proposes the construction of an office building and associated
parking facilities on the southwest corner of the intersection of Sprague
Avenue and Adams Road. The facility will begin with 216 parking spaces
in 1976. Proposed expansions in 1981 and 1986 will increase the parking
lot size to 420 spaces.
Carbon monoxide monito ring has not been conducted in this area. However,
based on existing trGl'fic flow and data 1rom other carbon monoxide
rrionitorang stations, it is estimated that the background carbon monoxide
levels in this area do not exceed 4 ppm. This is well below the Federal
ambient ai r standard of 9 ppm carbon monoxi de.
The impact of the facility on ambient ca rbon monoxide levels was modeled
'or t;he year 1976 as well as for 1981 and 1986 arnen expansion is pro-
jected. Our review indica-Led that under worst case conditions, the
anibi ent carbon monoxi de 1 evel s wil l be highest in 19706. The carbon
ironoxi de 1 evel s reduce i n subsequent years due to the Federal motor
ve1ii cle emi ss ;on program tthiGt rcquires carbon moroxz d-2 centr31s cn new
ca rs .
Tlle maxiinum carbon monoxide impact was dete nnined to be in the vicinity
o~ ~he in~ersection of Sprague Avenue and Adams Road. There are several
si ngl e faiiii1y residences in thi s area. At tni s i ntersection the carbon
rnonoxide concentration was estimated to be 6 ppm in 1976 under worst
case meteorological conditions. The carbon monoxide level dropped to
5.4 ppm in 1981 and 4.1 ppm in 1986. This was estimated using existing
- carbon monox7de background data and the Department of Ecology line source
difiusion model.
The appiican t has indicated in its applicai.ion its commitment to encourage
a1 ternates to the use ot the pri vate autonlobil e. 8ased on thi s and the
relatively insignificant impact of this facility on ambient carbon monoxide
levels, it is our intention to approve the application without conditions.
J MF : mc
ADDRi=55 REPLY TO SPOKANC' COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHOR{TY
NORTfI 811 JEFFERSON n SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
. ~
^~-,-.i---,--
-
- - - - - - - - - _ i ~ - ~ - i , , ►
_ - - ~ " ~1 i~"i ~ _ _ . ' ' _ ~ _ ~ ~ _ ' ' _ _ _ ' _
~ +14- rt= ~ = ~ - - - _ = _ : - - _ _ - - -~-i_I__ _ - - -
4-r
i _~i--r - ~ - - - -
_ J_L_
_1LL1~i
~-___-fi---~-i-- TT__ _E _ - • ~
~---~---L------
T - ~ IT- ~-T_ - _
~ _ - _ -;-~-l- - -U-~ -U-
-T- fi►_
~ - - I _ , T-i
I - -E ~ -
i
~ - - - - - - ~ - : l~ _ - t_- - - - `_1_ .
~
._t_
- -I. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y -r - - - - - - - - - - - ~
T _f_
41-
I , , ~ - -
- ~ - - - - ~ - -I- - - - - - - ~f- " I - - . - - - - _ _ ~ ~ _
1~' j ~ - - -`I~ - - - - - - - - - , - V,~~ - - ' G ; - - ~ - j - ~ ~ -
~ , ~ =I- - ~ - , - - . I, _ ,
- - ~ - - i_ _ i _ _ -f- - ~ ~ j ► i~"_.~ -L~`~'-- I ~ ~ ' ' ~ I~-
,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - _ _ ' J - ~ _ ~ _ I ~ ~._.~L ~ ~ .
i - I-~-~-
IT
i'~ i i ~ j
---1 ~ -
~ -
~I ~ ► ~ ~ i_l ~ I ~ ~ l~~
I (
T
t !
,
_ 1~ t , , . ~ , ~ is- - - ! ! _ i _1~-~J_ ' _!_f-r--_ _ ~.1 ~ ,
13~ ~
i ; ' , ' . i ~ i ' ~ -1- _L.- - - } , ; ~ - ~ -~;--I-~--. - ; i_ ...._p . _
LI1.S. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1_. , ' . ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ _LjL- -
~ ~ ► ~ ~ 'i'~ ( ~ 1 I~~
I ~
_~-1 71
~ ~ ~ 1 - j ~ - - - ( - - - - - - - - _ L ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ f_~
A-4
' 1976
DIFFUSI0:1 1KODEL INPUT DATA
1.72Xl 0- 7
Vehicles Averaqe Vehicle Grams Grams Geometry ~
Seament Per Hour SpE°d Per Mile M- Sec. Y Max. Y Min. ~ X Max. X rtin.
1 Sprague E 630 28 29 .00314 410 410 800 0
2 Sprague W 630 28 29 .00314 420 420 800 0
3 Adams N 90 20 42 .00065 700 0 620 620
4 Adams S 70 20 42 .00051 700 0 610 610
5 Parking A 10 10 59 .00010 410 220 400 400
6 Parking B 10 10 59 .00010 390 390 610 400
7 Parking C 10 10 59 .00010 220 220 610 400 `
s ~
9
10
11
12
Receptor Wind Angle Geometry
X Y
. ~ Wind speed: 1 metsrJsec.
R1 45 630 390 Wander angle: 22.5
Rz 45 639 350 hlixing cell Height (A): 2 meter
R3 135 570 430 Stability Class D: B=.10129
R4 210 640 430 K = .8286
JMF:mc
1981
DIFFUSION MODEL INPUT DATA
Vehicles Averaqe Vehicle Grams Grams Geometry ~
Segment Per Hour Speed Per Mile M- Sec. Y Max. Y Min. ~ X Max. X Min,
i
1 Sprague E 835 28 15 .00215 410 410 800 0 I
2 Sprague W 835 28 15 .00215 420 420 800 0
3 Adams H 122 20 22 .00046 700 0 620 620 `
4 Adams S 90 20 22 .00034 100 0 610 610
5 Parking A 16 10 31 .00009 410 220 400 400 ~
t
6 Parking B 16 10 31 .00009 390 390 610 400
7 Parking C 16 10 31 .00009 220 220 610 400
~
T a
9
10
L1
12
Receptor Wind Angle Geometry
x f Y
Wind speed: 1 meter/sec.
R1 45 630 390 bJander angle: 22.50
R2 45 630 350 Mixing cell height (A): ? meter
R3 135 570 430 Stability Class b: B=.10129
R4 210 640 430 K = .8286
JMF : mc
1986
DIFF'USION r10DEL INPUT DATA
Vehicles Average Vehicle Grams Grams Geometry
Segment Per Hour Speed Per Mile M- Sec, Y Max. Y Min. ~ X Max. X Min.
1 Sprague E 1006 28 10 .00113 410 410 800 0
;
2 Sprague W 1006 28 10 .00173 420 420 : 800 0~
3 Adams N 152 20 14 .00037 700 0 620 620
4 Adams S 108 20 14 .00026 100 0 610 610
5 Parking A 22 10 20 .00008 410 220 400 400
6 Parking B 22 10 20 .00008 390 390 , 610 400
7 Parking C 22 10 20 .00008 220 220 610 400
~ s
~
9
10
11
12
Receptor Wind Angle Geometry
X Y
R1 45 630 390 Wind speed: 1 meter/sec
R2 45 630 350 Wander angle: 22.50
R3 135 570 430 Mixing cell height (A): 2 meter
x4 210 640 430 Stability Class D. B=.10129
- , K = .8286
JMF:mc
c
r
- APPENDIX B
Design Data for the Sewage
Treatment Plant for the
Safeco Insurance Company's Division Office in Spokane, Washington
,
r
. ~
►
~VALKER/1IcG0UGH/FOLTZ/LYERLA, ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS
North 120 Woll Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Telephone (509) TE 5-8681
{ f /
January 22, 1975
Mr. Hilary Meyerle
Corporate Real Estate
Safeco Insurance Companies
4347 Brooklyn Ave., N.E.
Seafitle, Washington 98105
Re: Spokane Division Office
Safeco Insurance Co.
Our Project #7433
Gentlemen:
We enclose a preliminary plan and specifications (w/catalog cuts) of
the Sewage Treatment Plant recommended for the referenced project. The
following criteria was used in the selection process:
600 people @ 20 gallons/day including cafeteria = 12,000 gal/day
(10 gpd/person - office and 10 gpd/person - cafeteria)
' 600 people @.05#/d.a.y of BODS = 30# BODS
Use Smith f, Loveless or approved equal Type CY - Gyli.ndrical Oxigest, Model lOCY15
15,000 gpd = 1250 lineal feet of drain field
12 gpd/LF of drain field
If there are questions, please give us a call.
Very truly yours,
ti1IALKER/r.IcGOUGH/ TZ/LYERLA
~TE ~ . NGINEERS
~
' •
Gordon e. Ruehl, A.I.A.
Manager of Architectural Services
GER:ph
Enclosures
cc: Paul A. Clausen, Attorney
Haworth & Anderson, Inc.
As required for Reviewing Agencies
R_ i
l
I
~
- ~ I ;
I ~ ~ I
~ I A I
I
~
- - I ~ 1
F~ i t Lv • I
S 0 ~ C--D
h+ N 1~ G rZlal t,~ 'F 1
i~
. ~ _ I ~ ,-~..r_ , , ,
~ I I
~
i
~
~ ~ ;
•r~-~,- ~ j ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ , ~
' ~ ~
i '
q' ,
' ► , I ,
EXCLU5IVE NON-MECHANICAL SURFACE SKIM-
~ MER AUTOMATICAILY REMOVES FLOATING
ADJUSTABLE AIUMINUM EFFLUENT MATERIAI FROM STiLLING AND SETiLING SASIN
WEIR INSURES EVEN FLOW DISTRI- AREAS
BUTIONTHROUGH SETTtING BASIN
- AIR RELIEF VALVE
ADJUSTABIEEPOXY-COATEDSCUM FIITER-SILENCER WITH WEATHER HOOD
BAFfIE
RAIN-TIGHT MOTOR CONTROL BOX ~
DESIGN OF SETTIING BASIN PRO• V-BELT GUARD
VIDES EFFICIENT SEPARATION OF
CLEAR E"rFIUENT FROM ACTIVATED ROTARY-TYPE BIOWER
SLUDGE AND FLOATING SOLIDS AIR HEADER IS EPOXY-
' DRIP-PROOF ELECTRIC MOTOR COATE~ INSIDE ANO OUT
ALUMINUM AIR DIFFUSER OROP
PIPE WITH AIR REGUWTtNG VALVE EASILY REMOVASLE STA1N-
"r~:.~ LESS STEEL BASKET FOR
LIFTING LOOP 'SCREENING INCOMING
d-"~'~~" ► SEWAGE
12
= a y ~.~^v~ s~ ~ -'wr • ~LW~~Y" ' '
~ w K e~. ~c~~' INLET GROUT BOX
~ipM'r ♦ ~ ~ ~~Y~ ~~a ~ - ~ ~y
t ,i `..~r.i~~~."¢aw,~-~'L~ , ~.1:tir.. r`i
i ~ " r' fi~✓' ~ ~ ►~.r.3~1 'a-~ ~ _ ~
~ °r ~ r `n' r~ - p iw1 S }»lr* ~i~~'~N~-~''J~i*.~ ~1"~'y,.~~ + ~ •
i4E1`3a1• aa~!Z!~
~l x S ~ r Q} ~xrA Ya ';4 1 •~i~y ~~41k~ ~~sbY ~~6'%r~~S~,; t•~,c}f _ ►
~ - b ~ .rt~~ S,s 4~;~ ~'-~b F1. ~ +'L~~~~al~`'t' }~~;~}~''y'" s .
\ 4 ,r.. t 'r ~ C ` ,a 3 u.. • ~4''~ S~ ~~4 .
STILIING
y1.~
CHAMBER ` •'1 t' ' ~ -isw
t~ r ~GY AF-%A ~'y~v~, RY 4 1
v"+t'r k ^ r
4Tp
~ d J C I } 1
n w r:~ i~•t y • n
STIIIlNG CHAMBER
~ fi~ ,,;P r f a
INtET PIPE ~ ~ Y , • ~ ~•c~,~r ~..~j ~~',rl ~.,,L" 1s ~ : ~
~ t r~ ~'a +~i A ' ~ ~ i '1~ ° ~ ♦ +
~ ~ y..- ~ '~r,,.. ' t ~ ~ _ f ~ ~i ' . s o`• s+t
Wyi yf ~ t~ / i ~ a4
1 R ~
~~V ~ • ,y J ~ • ~ .YIT'~
• . ` ~~~~Q~ ' I ♦ ,y' J~
SUPPORT ANGLE WITH
ANCHOR BOLT MOLES
CYLINDRICAL AERATIOV GHAMBER
INDUCES COMPLETE MIXING FOR
MORE EFFICIENT Sc'WAGE TREAT-
, .
MENT
=
. ~ !
' CYLINDRICAL AERATION CHAMBER
PROVIDES HiGH VELOCITY SPIRAL ~
FLOW FOR EFFICIENT SUSPENSION
' 1 (
OF ACTIVATED SLUOGE - /
EPOXY COATED INTERIOR AND
CONCRETE SUPPORT PIER (SY OiF1ERS) EXTERIOR FOR SUPERIOR CORRO-
SION-RESISTANT PROTECTION
U S I ~E 2,7 U'y SUR~ AR C"iVE SKIMMI NG*
A new non•mechcrnicoi surfoce skimmer, standord The circulating liquid in the aeration tank (at left),
on all faclo-ory-built models, provides automotic re- fiowing past the strategically located eductors, sets
moval of floating material from the surface of the up a"return flow" which skims the surface of the ~
settling bosin by Q rton-mechanicol system - ex- settling basin cortipartments by drawing the surfoce
clusive with Smith & Loveless The system reduces liquid through the skimming troughs to the aeration
mainfienonce by removing floating particles (such tank. This feature reduces operotor time and
as grease, garbage ond denitrified sludge) from maintenance expense.
the settling basin. AVAILABLE ONLY FROM SMITH & LOVELESS
# PATENTS PfNDING
R- ~
~
•
. O ~
<
~
a
MOllf.L CY "OXIGEST"
fACTORY-DUILT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS m
DESICN DATA SELECTI4N TABLE a
~ .
t/
C) ' °4'
Acration Tank Clanficr Blowers Dimensions hpprox o,.-
Norm,il Surface Overiluw Shipping -1
N4odcl C.i aLif BOD C,i Arca Itatc ti/olumr Ca icit
P Y P r y S~~ccd Lcngth Nidth 1Vci~ ~ht o
No Cal Lbs /1)(1) Sq Ft GPI)/Sq Ft GaI CFA9 RPN1(2) ElP Ft •ln Ft -In Lbt
. ~ ,
.
8C Y2 2,000 4 10 100 540 14 1225 1'/: 10-3 8-0 5,850 ~ 8CY3 3,000 6 l0 150 540 18 1342 1 Yz 13-1 8-0 6,550
5
8CY4 4,000 8 20 200 540 22 1438 I-Yz 15-I1'/~ 8-0 7,300 -0' i~
fiCYS 5,000 10 20 250 540 ?G 1555 1•'/~ 1 8-9 1/2 8-0 7,900 cu
8CY6 6,000 12 38 158 855 30 1680 I% 21-11 5I8 8•0 8,650
8CY1 7,000 14 38 184 855 33 1750 1•%: 24-9 7/8 8-0 9,300 8CY8 8,000 IG 38 ?II 855 37 1870 1 17-8 1/8 8-0 9,950 X
8CY9 9 000 18 38 2 3) 7 855 42 2020 2 30-6 3/8 8•0 10,600
8CY 10 10,000 20 38 263 855 46 2130 2 33-4 5/8 8-0 11,250 0)'
l OC1" I 0 10,000 20 GO 165 1613 46 2130 : 1-4-6 1/8 1 0-0 11 450
d
l O C Y I? 5 1~ 5 0 0 25 64 107 161 3 59 1496 3 29-1 5/8 10-0 12,750
lOCY15 15,000 30 60 248 1013 GS I625 3 33•8 3/8 10•0 14,000 cr)~
I OCY 17 5 17,500 35 GO 281) 1613 68 1685 ~ 38-3 I /8 10-0 15,350 Ln~^~ g
I? C Y'_ 0 20,000 40 72 278 1913 70 1685 3 3 6-0 3/8 12• Q 15,650 ~
I 2CY2? S 22,500 45 72 313 1913 74 1750 3 39-9 1l8 1 2-0 16,750
(I) Recommcndcd S•day DOU loading for extendca acr,ihai treaunent bascd on approxunately 15 Ibs, 5•day $UI) per
1,000 cu ft of acration tank capacity
(2) ;t9odcl5 8CY2 througli lOCY10 furnished ~vith t~vo Smith 3c Lovciess Model 7Ll28 blowers C~ 3 5 PS( Model~ ~IA o
IOCYI?5 and largcr lurnished widi Smi tli & Lovrlcss A1ode1 7L129 blowers ' 35 PSI All blowcrs on ctandard t0 ~
-
plants are tlnvcn by 230 volt, 3 phasc GO tfcrtr motors ~ 00
_ ~
»
d
d
c
m
C~ p
A = G.
7 ~
A
+ 0~
,
d
F
~
~ Eleclric Service Alr Fiuar -Sdencer
p ~ ^ I conne,ioon
(bYOthersl ' • Orll Cuard
Blorer
IT!b MaQnneium Anode
Pctk • Ono In4lnlsed Eo
furmcnod SETTLING
Ene
noln - Insrou ai Far ~ UnSIN - r4 la I~,j -
( EqwpTent
From Whl! of TorM as AdjusfoDle 14 ~J'~ ~ " hl~ Romovotl• I~
Simnlass Steet Muunpnq 8o,e
y~ ~
Connecian Wdl Ailor Alwn Weir• AERaTION TdNK
5citiening ~ - -..r
Staal Scum ~ SklmmmQ E ~ ~ h~
Trouqn Liflinq Loop
Elaffle- 1 ~ I Rem Tiqnt Moior U' OaU An Nealer
~ ~T - - - - _ _ • J_ _ _ Conlrol Box- Mounhna HarCwort
~j - - - tOne pcr llalorl $uOPOrt AnqieS
~L I-V-l-~- MrNeader f.l
_ _ /y--' _ ~ _ - - r- - - - - - - Ouqeft TaVAnqle ~ L
' Nouol 5 EL Chock Valve
FiDaiqlois Eqaipment P~AN ncrotion TonM~ SECTION G-G
flowmq (001ionol
EpuiDmea1 ) ALOWER EQUIPNCNT flA,,E ON aIR 1fEaDER
+
4' Etlluanf Flenpe r► G
Connuclion-A S d I^3 lE I -9'-Normot r)"x q 6"Moi Uio C I
r" . SlonJurGlPipmq by Othars) If ''1 LiquiG Air Iteader Inlel P+De -OKiyest
Lavel 1 fbr Oihenl Top AnQlo
T.' ciaaa
2
+a ~-C - - - - -~f = _ i~ ~I~,
~ ~Invort I
T 1 i
~ EfflLent I Osi eal -
I ~ Trou9h u let' ~ of Inlet
f •Stillinq 6=3"
~ Chamber 7'-10'-8CY
~ I I~lei P~pa .g gL 9=93
pdtueert /g:-IOCY E 12C1
Y P
'-Relnloranq ~ y
\ + Anqles Sludqe ~I
~ ~INo Vones) Roturn Slo1 Air Orolnbuhon
Spslem Orop Pipoe a
I ~ ( (No Vanef-See CAorl)
F~-~ • + ~ !
6 f61 61-- 8 'fir{6 AncAor Oolf I+ Anchor Bolh
~ rMale Locahont Concrele ~ I B tf0UN0ATI0N ~-C i Oi~en1
I (TYD 2 Endl) FounCONOn lbY
~
F + ler olhenl LONGITUDINAL SEC TI ON
~
MooEL ~ 8CY6 8CY7 I OCYd I 8CY9 1 ecrto itacria I iocrizsIIU~CYlS ~IOCY115112CY20 112CY225
CAPACITY-GPDJ 6,000 7,000 I 8,000 ~ 9,000 1 I0,000 ~ 10,000 ~ 12,500 I 15 000 ~ I7 500 I 20 000 112 500
D, h,l Q ~LI'-IlO/e' 24-97/g" 27'-Obp13O-b3/g 33'•43/g"I24-67/p 29-I3/y` 7l-9S~B~38'•34g"~jb-03g'~]~-9~/g'
DIM B ~17'-04j 20-642f23-4AT4;'j 2u'-3' 29-I1,4 ~19'-3314 23'-I01h° 28'-S`pf 33'-0' 130•914"174'6'
oua C I e'-o ~ e'-o° ~ e-o' ~ a'-o' ~ e-o' ~ io'-o' ~io'-o' ~ fol-o° ~ io'-o° 1 12i-o° 1 1i,0.
DIM a 5-103/4` 5'-I0 3/4" 3'-103/4 ' S'-103/4' 5'-103/4° T'-73Ag' 7 -7-1?W* P'7!h6 1 7''741 81 V_73Ad" 17'.7 • I'~.,.~j --.a....
A16
DIM E ~3'103/8 ~3'-10 3/g3'- 103'-I0 3/gj 3•103/ 4-6-/j,~4'•63Iq~'I.-b3/44'•63/4"I9'-93/g"19'-9S/g.
ORI F , T~-U' I 7-0' I 7-0' 7'-0° I 1-0'~A-3VZ I8'-3VZ 1 8'-31/2' I8~31/2" I9'-3/2 19 02" g•~.~+•~ MIL
MG6ElCYCrUnDRitatOriatsT
SEWALE ikfATMENT1LANfwDROP PPCEiSTr I ~ I ~ I e ~ 9 I IO I 6 I 8 I 9 I II ( 10 I 11 ;•;.",L AUIOSKIMMINGC5LU06LHEIURN
TI
.
_i i L
fVlodel CY
Specitications
- ~ Page 1
~C`'` 1 ~ •r ` o • ( e ' 9 • ~ '
A Division oF Ecodyne Corporatfon • Main Plant Lenexa, Kansas 66215
~ SPECI FICATiONS
MODEL CY
FACTORY-BUILT "OXIGEST" WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
GENERAL filter silencers vvith weatlier hood ancl outlet check valve The
chpck valve shall be scre{rred into the blovuer discharge and
There shall be furnished one factory built extended aeration shall extend a short clistance into the air header
type wastewa[er treatment plant tivi*,h all needed equipment
for the efficient opzration of the plant Sirnilar units may A complete air supply system consisting of an air header and
be provided for parallel opzration where the total capacity several aeratiori drop pipe assemblies shall be furnished A
justifies such construction The plant shall be of weided steel diaphragm actuated air pressure relief valve shall be provided
C construction divided into two major sections (an aeration for mounting by the purchaser on the air header
compartment and a clarifier) and painteci with an epoxy
coating for corrosion protection INLET BOX
The principal items of equipment in each unit shall inclucle A welcled steel inlet box shall be provided at tha aeration
screening basket, aeration equlpment, efifluPnt trough, cosnpartment end of the treatment plant structure to receive
automatic hydraulic stcimming system, rotary positive the incoming sewei The sevver shall be 6" or smaller Class
displarement biowers compleie with necessary motors and 150 cast iron pip2 iuinishecl by the purchaser to bridga the
controls, blower drive belt guard and all necessary internal disturbed earth adjacent to the structure Ths cast iron pipe
piping The treatment plant structure shall be constructed to vjill be grouted in place in the bc►x during the installation
withstand normal pressures from the soil and from the interior by the purchaser, using portland cement mortar containing
hyclrostatic load Embeco
OPERATING COIVDITIONS SCREENING BASKET
The plant shall be capable of treating gallons per A removable stainiess steel screeniiig hasket shall be provided
day of rdW sanitary wastewater with an organic loadiiig of at the inlet to rernove any unusually large solids from the
pounds of 5 day BOD This load ts figured on the raw wasiewater as it enters thP plant The basket shall be
basis of per capita daily wastewacer ftow of gallons fabiicated from 3116" diameter #302 stainless steei wire
and per capita daily 5 day BOD of pauncls Thp designed to be easily removed for cleaning purposes
treatment capaaty shall be provided in wastewater
treatment unit(s), Smith & Loveless Model AERATION COMPARTiV1CNT
CONSTRUCTION The aeration cacnpartment snali be of cylincirical shape with
its axis horizontal and shall have sufficient capacity to provide
Each unit sliall form a complete wastewater treatment plant approximately 24 hours cfetention of the wastewater at fuil
by itself The treatment plant proper shall consist of an design flow This compai tmen[ shall have a structural steel
aeration tark and a clarifier in one structure with all npcessary framed rectangular opening at the top
baffle; and partitions factory ir,stal{ed Ail clarifier side walls,
partitions, asration tank shell and end plates shall be of 1/4" A properly sized clarifier inlet pipe shall be installed on the
thick structural grade steel plate All struciural stiapes used partition plate between the clarifier and the aeration tank
for reinforcing aiid bracingshall have 1/4" minimum thickness The pipe shall be instafled on the aeiation tank sicle of the
rn their thinnest section A str uctural angle shall be welded partition plate and sfiafl make a 900 bend directed to the
to thP aeration tank end plates, as shown on the plans, to right harid side of the plant when viewed looking downstream
provide for support anci anchoring of the treatmerit unit
Two clei'lector plates shall b.- insttilled on the partition plate,
The unit shall be designed for installation below grade with one above and one below thc slot in the partition plate that
backfill to 9" below the top anyte rinq Below grads allows the sludge f►om the clarifier to enter the aeration tank
inst3llation provides maintenanc.e access to the plant more The deflector plates shall be direc,ted downward to eliminate
economir.ally than walkways, provides temperature insulation fiow currents from entering the slot from the aPration tank
needed for smaller plants ard reduces or eliminates pumping side of the partition plate
CpSt
AIR DISTRIBUTION HEADER
Thp blotiv?rs shall be belt driven, and eauipped with belt
guard~, Each blower and motor drive shall be mounted on An air distribu*,ion heider on which is mounted sufficient
a co'nmon base Uvhich shall b° holted to the air headsr by individual aeration drop pipe assemblies to permit
the pircnaser The blo:vers shall be equipped with air intakP introduction of the maximum quantity air required shall be
B-F
Madel CY
Specifications
Page 2
installed alang the length of and above thp v+rater level of the clari fier and discharge rt to the aeratian campartment through
aeration compartment The header shall be 4" x 3" rectangul3r spectfically designecl eductor devices The skimming system
sieel tub+ng and shall be lang envugh to f7ofd the required shall require no moving parts or mechanical pquipment and ~
number af aeration drop pipes The header shall be at+ached shall require no direct power, but the system siia11 vperate
to and supported from the framed opening at the top of the entirely on the hydrauiic energy narmally availaUEe in the
aeration cornpartment The header shall be supparted from aeratian compartment of the plant
the right hand side of the #ram.ed opening as vizwed when
looking douvnstream The aeration drop pipe assembiies and C3UTLET PIPING CONNECTfON
all air piotng and fittings shall be assembled and shrpped on
the treatment pfant structure A f1anged welcled steel autlet pipe shall be pravided at the
end of the treatment pfant siructure to permit ConneCiion
ElECTRiCAL CONTRULS AND WIRING of tfie effluent pipe to the outfall sewer It shall accommodate
a#langed cast irvn pipe furnished by the purchaser t4 fiorm
For each bfower motor, a suitab;e di5corinect d°vice wrth short the ftrst sption of outfall sewer and to bridge the disiurbed
circuit and motor overload proEectian shall be provicEed in graund adjacent to the structure
a rain trght NEMA 3R enclosure and shall be mounteci near ~
the ec}uiprnent it contrais A11 controls shall be clearly BLOWERS
tdentified and all rnternal plant 4V+rlng shall be #actory
mstalled Two blowers shall be furnEShed, each to deliver CFM
of free air measured at the biower in1et of 3 5 PSI when
All wire and canduit required beiween the treatmer+t plant operating at a speed af RPM Blowars shall be S&L
electncal control enclosures and the electrical power service Part No rotary positive cJisplacement type wrth
shall be furnishecf ancJ in5tallecl by thp purchaser Wirtng and 9uardecl V-belt connection to the motors Blowers shall be
condUit -jetween the electrical control enclosures and equipped with filter silencers with weather hood and speciafly
factory assembled electrical equipment shall be furnfshed and built check valve
instafled hy the manufiacturer
MUTORS
CLARlF1ER
Each blower shall be clriven by a HP, 1750 RPM,
The clarrfier shall havp a V shapeci Eaottom farmed by slopirig volt, phase, Hertz, horizontal, open
the enci watl of the plant strL:cture toward the partitian wall drip praof*, tatally encEosed and fan cooled;, ba11 bearing
between the clarifier and the aPration cnmpartment A divider electric rnotor ,
plate parallel to the partition wall between the clarifier and
aeration cvmpartment shall be prov,cled to aid in absorbing Motors shall be maunted on a steei base pfate with slofs
and di5sipating inlet velocity energy Ari opening on each end provicled for adjustment The motors shall have a 15% service
vf the divider plate stiail be provideti tv alfow flow from the factor but shall nQt be overloaded beyand the nameplate
stilling chamber to pa5s into the clar,fier Twa baffles, one rating at the design conditEons specified above
on either side af the inlet pipe flaw from the aeration
cvmpartment and between rt and -the apenings in tha ciivider "Delete items not requfred
plate, shall be provided to assist in absorbing and d+ssipating
the inlzt velocity energy BLOWER HOUSI(UG (OPTIQNAL)
After passing through the clartfier, the clarified Irquttl shall A fiber glass reinfarcecl, one p+ece, rectangular plastic housing, (
pass over ihe eclge of thP effluent traugh weir tnto the efflt►ent hinged at the base anrJ pravicied dvith a tumbler type tock
trough ar+d thraugh the effluent pfpe to thn trzatment pfant W+I( he furnished ta pratect motors, blQwers, and elecirica4
outlet Thp sludge, which settles to the battam of the hopper, controls The blower housing to be mstalled by the purchaser
wi(I be carried dovin4vard by the continuous #low through the
battom slot and w+ll reenier the aeratRon chamber WELDING
The effRuent trough weir shAl be made af 1/81' aluminum All steel structural members shall be toined by eCectnc arG piate It shall have a notched overflar,v edge and shall he welcling w ith fillets ofi aclequate section far the joint involved
mounted to permrt easy actju,,tmartt for level and height A Where required for adclitional sectional strength, such welds
scum baf€le shall be irtstalletl in franc ofi the Pfifluent trougfi shall be continuous insidz and aut
The effluent trough shall drain to thz effluent pipe ai the
PROTECTlON AGA{11iST CORROSION AND A6RASIiJN
center Qf the trvugh
AUTOMATIC SK1MMIiUG SYSTEM After welciing, all steel surfaces shall be blasted to remove `
rust, rnili scale, weld slag, etc All 4veld spatter and surface
To ob'ain contlnu0u5 automatic rcmovai of floa ting solids rout~hness shall be removed by grindrng Follo~ving cleanmg,
froi-n th° clarifier water surface, a hydraulic skcmming sy5tern a single heavy inert coaiing shall be applied to all sur#aces
shall ba provided This systQm sliall consist of skimming Th:s coating slia1{ be of "vet5apox-Tt" epoxy resin especially
troughs ~,ih.ch ciraw floating matenal #rom the surface of the farmulated by Smith & Laveless for abrasion and corrosion
f) 7
~ Model CY
Specifications
Page 3
resistance The dry coating shall contain a minimum of 85°,o to the owner He shall further provide, tivithout cost, such
epoxy resin with the balance being pigments ancl thixotropic labor as may be required to replace, repair or modify major
~ agents The dry coating shall be a minimum of 6 mils components such as plant structure, blowers, blower moiors,
thickness etc , after start up service has bzen performed The labor to
replace accessory items, when furnished, shall be the
All comminutors and all accessory equipment items mounted responsibility of others
on the main plant structure shall be factory coated with Smith
& LovPless I 'versapox-T" epoxy resin Blowers and biowier The replacement or repair (including cost of parts and labor)
motors shali be furnished with the original manufacturer's of those items normally consumed in service, such as drive
shop coating belts, ai• filter elements, oil, grease, etc , shall be considered
as part of the purchaser's routine plant maintenance and
of versapox T" shall be especially formulated for ease of upkeep
touch-up over field welding and to resist chalking due to
suniight It shall provide effective corrosion protection with (t is not intended that the manufacturer assumes responsibility
reasonable maintenance of areas damaged in service When for contingent liabilities or consequential damages of any
~recoating is required or if an aesthetic finish is desired on nature resulti ng from defects in design, material,
poriions of the plant "versapox T' I shall be amenable to workmanship, or delays in delivery, replacement or otherwise
recoating with alkyd or epoxy enamel; or coal tar products
All stainless steel, aluminum and other corrosion iesistant
surfaces shall not be coated
A touch-up kit shail be provided far repair of all scratches
or mars occurring during instaliation This kit shall contain
detailed instructions for use and shall be a material which
is compatible with the original coatings
For cathodic protection of plants instalied below ground, a
minimum of two 17# packaged magnesium anodes shall be
buried around the structure and securely connectecl thereto
by heavy copper wires in good electrical contact with the steel
FACTORY-TEST
The motors and blowers as well as the electrical control
equipment shall be tested at the factory
WORKMANSHIP AND EXPERIENCE
All vvorkmanship and materials throughout shall be of the
highest quality The treatment plant shall be the product of
~ a manufacturer with a minimum of five years experience in
the design and manufacture of wastewater treatment
equipment
GUARANTEE
The manufacturer of the wastewater treatment plant shall
guarantee for 18 months from date of shipment or one year
from date of start-up, 4vhichever occurs first, that the structure
and all equipment will be free from defects in design, material
and workmanship
Warranties and guarantees by the suppliers of various
components in lieu of a single source responsibiiity by the
( manufacturer will not be accepted The manufacturer shall
be solely responsible for the guarantee of the plarit and all
components
(n the event a component fails to perform as specified or
is proven defective in service during the guarantee period, the
manufacturer shalt provide a replacement part without cost
R-R
f
APPENDIX C
,
Appl i cation for Revi ew ,of a
,
Complex Source
January 31, 1975
(minus Site Map, Attachment B)
Safeco 1nsurance C'ompany Division Office `
Spokane, Washington
'r,, - F~ ~~Y~ ~I~Y~V ~~~rr ~vV~ ~ ■ ~I~~~Yr~r~cY ■ ~
PO,tA;,'E
' ~ J APPLICI~TION I'OR RLVIEW OF A COMP~X SOURCE
t11 l GW l''I
1. Source Description (See Location l1ap: ATTACHMENT A)
.
a. Name SAFECO IPJSURANCE COPIPANY OF AMERICA
b. Type of Facility DIVISI0N OFFICE
c. Days and Hours of operationPlONDAY - FRIDAY (f) 7:30 am to 4:30 pm
2. Location of source SW CORPJER OF SPRAGUE AND ADAMS IN THE SPOKANE UALLEY
(Include map showing location of facility in relation to adjacent streets)
3. Parkinq spaces (See Site Map: ATTACHMENT B)
a. Total area of parking lot ±)70,200 sq. ft. immediately & equal amt. later
Initial Phase ~1977) = 205 stalls; Phase 1(1981) = 289 stalls (total)
b. Number of Spaces Phases 2& 3(1986) = 409 stalls (total); plus 11 stalls
cAttach map shoiving layout of parking lot and arrangement of parking spaces
indicating traffic flow patterns) for visitors and company cars.
4. Vehicle Usaae Data Within Facility
a. A7aximum 1-hour vehicle usage rate ATTACHMENT C
b. Maximum 8-hour vehicle usage rate
c. Attach table giving projected vehicle usage by hour.(See ATTACHMENT C) `
d. Average time required to enter faci:lity ± one minute
e. Average time required to leave facility t one minute
5. ALdajacent Street Traffic Flow
Applicant must provide existing and projected traffic flows by the hour for
adjacent streets and nearby urban arterials as follows:(See ATTACNMENT D1 - D4)
d. b.
c. d.
6. Calculated Impa(,t on AmbiEnt Carbon Monoxide Levels
This may be done by the ageiicy or by the applicant at the applicants discrei:ion.
If the applicant makes the calculation the Agency guidelines on ambient carbon
monoxide monitoring and diffusion modeling must be followed.
7. Applicant: Name Mr. Paul A. Clausen
Phone (509) 624 9219
Nailing Ac7dress 702 Fidelitv Buildinq, Saokane, Wash. 99201
Applicants Signature
8/2/74
AODRESS REPLY TO SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON C-1 SPOKAtJE WASHINGTON 99201
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
OF A COh1PLEX SOURCE
One additional point should be made on behalf of SAFECO concerning
their attitude toward alternatives to the automobile as an employee
transportation mode. It is the established policy of the company
to encourage its employees to utilize car pooling and other alterna-
tives to reduce the use of the private auto and its characteristic
single occupant trips. Furthermore, although bus service is current-
ly limited to 14 east bound and 11 west bound week day trips on Spra-
gue Avenue adjacent to the site, company policy will be to encourage
maximum employee utilization of the service. To the extent that bi-
cycling to and from the facility becomes popular and/or can be en-
couraged, racks will be provided as appropriate.
In regard to this facility's potential as a point source of air pol-
lution on the basis of its heating and cooling equipment, the company
and its architects and environmental consultants, respectively, Walker,
hlcCough, Foltz/Lyerla and Haworth and Anderson, Inc., are currently
planning a hot/cold circulating water system with the energy source
being hydroelectric supplied electricity with an optional insta]led
natural gas energy source.
C- 2
o ~ i~ 1r Hlqn ~yh Se hool I ~e Q
Nr..9.oe i ~ Scnml ~ r
~ l l! [ - :.~.433s.,. ~ ~ 1 , ' ~ / ~ • . ~t Y , ~„r i ~ -i9 WP 26 NOR T~ 11NI
1 • - - ~ - ~ r--'-_ : w a i s 0qlt T N
~ I
~ I • n1 P~unlr ~ ~v►-~ . r•~ i
/I t r ( w ll W ~ ~ , ,a ~
. ~
Q • CF • ~ ~ ~ ~ I )
'
\ o [t t011
1' `jl ~ r : _ d ~ - L~ I ~ a `i+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~^ti ~ ~S •~4 wA r
O
/E n• % r - '
r re• / ~s r1 i~ 1 _ ? _'a~ ~ _
I ,6 + \
• ` v I j " + ~
I _ •r ~ _ ~ I ( ~ .a
~
` ~ _ey„~: ~ I ( ^ :
1.14 r I v ~
/1 L UM/NG M , SP0~4 NE i~ rc
RUL ~ /NG ~ ~I%L L ~ /NDUS Tf~.lAL PARK
l~ .
f J, t fl_ ~~t 1 `t li Lol, A..1
a ?
~
c 1 ~ I [ucL-o I R ~vE :
~
11 jj ~ ^
i1JL~1!IU I \1 JfNOL ~ 'Q ~
n
b9-OGt 1,t~r~ ♦ t
~ ~d'w~~ \ F ~~4 s
.o~,f, .s.,_ ~ _ _ -1 . ~
r ~ •VI~.~' ~J~ ~ 11~ ` 4 ~ - 4"~ - ~ > I N ~
wD~aw• / 1~ - I I I
I ~
\ I ` J
~ T / ~ I 1
o aTF~~e
a ; i ^•~~A
3 4 ~ S~ ~ 'ON 4 1,
ljayd ~ MISStONAVG.
~ n ~ : ~ .
99 l~o~~ ~ Y •
~~u,• ~.,c - Z- o_,~r~ • O = ..,~~i S~ ~-wa'
3p Q
n n sw ~ O
~ ~ - _ ' ' •
lI "ts j' n ri fl -v '[~c I o.~ 1 I~~; ~aF
~ ~ c... ~ Q~ ~QJ' W iDGt ~M r !
~ ~w.~~oc cA.O
>
~ i~ F ~ .JYL„ ~ ~'s~~~ wv f Y~ 1 AvE ~ w~ ~ e noiOw~v ~v ~ INTER
~I~,.
Nerf~, ~ ,7 E! J . ~r~~~~~ f~r~ ~1tOAn1e[
J.n~~
~ G ~ 4t~t~r~oftj ~
i I
I srn~~o~ .
o;
w. • ~ o~..~„ ~ ~ p ~
J •
-
~
rJ
~ +i --U,'y~ a r `
I
' ~ = • , plv~ ME~LL (r , t i V~ t L 1 ~ ~ r ~ _ 911 1
4 [c 1093 P !t ~fia • . 3 . ~ : t o!~ v ~ i 1
SI q4(~1! M M -
W-A E~JJ
'•r--L,.,, ''+rr
, ~~~a /U"~ i~ ,lie •~F ~ n - . _ . • ~
1 L.t ~ • { 41N PvL ~ bT~. Se►r. ~ t ~'~c- 1 • n ~
~
" . . ~ I _C~7\•u . . L
a i 2 ~ w _
M-~
D t ~ . ' , ~ C~ 1'Y'v ~ ' ` ~J ~ ~ ; ~i ' ~
c £L!f W430
~ f
_ IuIrt~••~ ~t W..~D4_..___ ~ • ~ ~
t~ ~ a ~ L~tLA • ~ ~ ' r Adorrt u t' Cfflfrol Vuf'fy+ LAI(f
JI luwt0 .9 tR'qNe 41.. n l
' 27, 1~_.._ _ a ~
•j ~ ~T~ a~ ias ~w ~e~ iM ~iY ~w nt j •.r
~ ~ + A
V '1
71 Sc~K o!
~c
` ,.~.144 ~ - - - • . , I
ATTACHMENT A
o , ~ ~ , , ~ t ~ :
~ .I
It'
or SITE LOCATION MAP FOR SaFECO
~ r' V • • -'Y . 'oTN/ ~I , ,w~ ~ INSURANCE COP1PANY OF AMERICA
DIUISION OFFICE, SPOKANE, WA.
. . ;
~~i ' f ` ~ ~ S I T E.~..~.~r..L
~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ SCALE : 1 1 /2 mi 1 e
~ . ~
?~T~ ~ mSrA~ „ o ~ e• • • a~~ o [d t ~rrn~
y - ,11 I ~
1
~ • a r , ` ~n 1 ~i~. ,1 ~~fl~e~'~~ ~ _ ~ t~~~', I w + f
~ • Ir-„"`-L ? ~ ' E : i_ i: ~ l '~i • ♦
C-3
ATTACHMENT C
PROJECTED BUSINESS DAY VEHICLE PARKING LOT
1
INGRESSES AND EGRESSES
1976 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
213 Employees 1981 1986 1991
TIME 216 Car parks2 322 Employees2 433 Employees2 361 Employees?
OF DAY 300 Car parks 420 Car parks 420 Car parks
7:00 a.m.-8:00 a.m. 130 197 264 342
8:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m. 12 18 24 31
9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. 7 11 14 19
10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. 7 11 14 19 '
11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. 41 62 83 108
12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m. 21 32 43 56
1:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. 30 45 61 79
2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. 11 17 23 29
3•00 p.m.-4•00 p.m. 7 11 14 19
4:00 p.m.-5•00 p.m. 128 194 260 337
5:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m. 9 14 18 24
TOTAL 403 613 818 1063
130 197 264 342
MAXIMUM 1 HOUR TOTAL 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. to 7•00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. to
8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m.
259 394 526 683
MAXIMUM 8 HOUR TOTAL 7-00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. to
3:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 3•00 p.m.
4
1 See accompanying sheet• "Vehi cle Activity--Data Assumptions"; also, employee
projections are as of November 21, 1974, as obtained f rom the architect.
2Includes 11 visitor and company car stalls.
C-4
VEHICLE ACTIVITY - DATA ASSUMPTIONS
(SUPPLEPIENT TO ATTACHMENT C)
The accompanying chart, ATTACHMENT C, represents the best possible esti-
mate of vehicle activity at the proposed SAFECO Division Office Ob-
viously no concrete data is available when one is projecting into the
future. The 1976 base year figures were arrived at on the basis of a
ratio of total cars driven to work compared to total employees. The ratios
were held constant during the future projection dates of 1981, 1986, and
1991. It is virtually certain that the ratios would be different as al-
ternative modes of transportation become practical, as dwiRdlinq energy
resources become scarcer and as new resources are developed. However,
all of these factors are unknown quantities and it is our opinion that
holding the ratios constant allows for as yet untold develonments on both
the positive and the negative side of the energy issue, and that such a
decision on our part is a conservative basis for projection.
The original ratio estimates for Phase 1 were determined after consultation
with officials at a large local firm. Their office facility in Spokane has
a relatively fixed number of employees and a fairly stable number of cars
driven to the site each day. Their employee composition is not unlike the
projected staff of SAFECO, i.e., a 50-50% men/women breakdown consisting of
management, mid-management, and clerical/skilled-blue collar employees.
Furthermore, although bus service activity in the general area is more active,
none of the routes pass directly by the facility referenced above; the closest
route passes within about four blocks of the site. Consequently, utilization
of the bus service at SAFECO may have similar characteristics to that of
the other facility studied; and such was assumed for the purposes of vehicle
projection at SAFECO. The number of employee lunch meals handled in the
cafeteria of the other firm was also available, suggesting an expression of
the number of persons, and hence autos, possibly leaving durinq the noon hour.
This was also utilized in the SAFECO proaections.
HAWORTH AND ANDERSON, INC.
C-5
ATTACHMENT D ~
;
TRAFFIC FLOW MAP - SPOKANE VALLEY - 197`2
~ , Office of Spokane County Engi,neer i
~
L U -
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
. ~
~
~ •
.
~
a ~
isa.)o
e010
e . c o
N ° u1< <<o r v
~
JIL
otoi _ ~ ~ n ta ~a~ ' -
^ -7 r
N Q .
~
/
~
' N
. . 7100
v ? ~
• ~ ♦`7 •
t1p( },1K
~ r Tl3Q
- ~ 4 ~ ^
24 3
) N n . J
f
:
i i
^
~ 0
0 7 7 Lr) ~
v ~1270 0 ,`•940 '4380
' • •7 ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1
s rf 1 `
L 2020 0 1560 o 176 ~
1-1 °
rn o~0
, ~
.
• ~
d~
1 ~
~ .
7 N C O
~ • C
t I ~ v V
- 't: f tl-----
~ 3 ~ . tl
N
O ~ ~ N
• ~
2310
~E! s ~ • i ,
a r ~ p
~
( U
1170
. j o • ~ • ~ • l 1 I
f
21
W
y ~ W l~ Q ~ >
I[ s _
l J
U J l J
W Q 7 7
• A tn
I
7 . ~ •
~ , 1 r F V
t
0 ,
C-6
ATTACHMENT D2
' TRAFFIC FLOW MAP - SPOKANE VALLEY - 1974
L O ff i'ce of Spokane County Engi neer AVSF tF . U' "
~ f ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
,
T ~
♦
f \ \ ~
\
t
~
~5n~o f r c)
1 w ~ ~ ~ eo~a
~
o a ' ~ o
010
N ?
I ,
N
, : ' ~tau
~ p a
i~' ~ f• ~ ' ~IRI 1~~1~~ ~ r 7! 70
_
~ ~ ~ _ ~ 5610
z~ ~ ~ e Z~a ~ . ~ ~
? M ~ 7
~ V
r ~
I 1
i
~
o r--
~d~, ,O . O
1830 950 r- 5450
, - ~
~
~ . ' • - ; 2250 0 1210 0 3710 ~ ~
r-- rn k°
- o a~►
t r
a I
N 0
I I + - V
Q r ~
n ~
~ ~ r • i. y ~~S _ w 2310
~ • J`~'~ e ; J'~~j
t!• ' ~2,~1 ( 1 J '+ri. ~ • tw1 ,
i i • [ ti
o ~ ' t ,r
~
i
t „ o
+ ~ o ~ ~ • ' -
~
ra i~ C 1
W Q' J
n
i
tr
m - -
~ i
r
A :
r
C-/
r ATTACNMENT D3
TRAFFIC FLOW MAP - SPOKANE VALLEY - 1981
~ Projected by Hawurth and Anderson, Inc.* ~
I MAVCF U i
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
~ *Projecl.ed from 1974 data on the basi s of
' a 4% annual increase as commonly used by thecbtTty. ~
,
► ~ ~
`
r54JC
o O N ~<< ' ~
.
970 ) O ii 1c> '
N 4
N
7140
~ e V
~ 1 t : ~ ' . ' fl+ 1(1f ~ ~!)O
~ 8 S, 5610
2• 7 ~ o 17 rJr 141
~ N n r
' LC)
0 tt
M (Y~
O
° O
y•~ , r,~ ~ ,q, LO ~'2408 J 250 ~ 7172
, h
S ~ f
r 2961 r- 1592 ~ ~ 488 ~
'
. • - _
° M M N
r.. r--
; a
r
s
s ~
~ o 0
o c
, , -'C;, % Q_" ri a
v • N
fl ~ N
10 ~ V 0
C •
~ t - te~. ' • ,Zn L ~ , r.. .
~ N
o ~ r r
c
°
e . ' .o•
t~ ~ ~ p •
1
r
~ .
2
W d
cr >
l II ~ l W d 7 ~ n rn
T , i 1' Y`J S
m
i
i
,
,
- - - ~--g .
ATTACHMENT D4
;
TRAFFIC FLOW MAP - SPOKANE VALIEY - 1986
Projected by Hawurth and Anderson, Inc.* ,
~ LAN f U %
! r
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
„ *Projected from 1974 data on the basi s of
~
,4 a 4% annual increase as commonly used by the \\cbVty.
.
.
` '
41
.
154 5C `
7 ,l
~
I ^q ~ ~ C rI
1 ~
070 ` 7 12tl 1 1 '
N T ~
~
N
7140
~
~ l 1J .
NWt K ~ 7130
Ta
,
zJ ° 7 ra:
~ 1 a' C 7~ So' - } Sblo
N ^ )
~
~ co
M
co ~2930 ~ ~1521 ~ 8726
Ia r , i _4 +
3602 ~o ~1937 0 5944 ~
o * r~ -
N 01 tO
l0 I.n e-
' r-
~
s ~ o ti u o
r . • ~
~
. v
O 11 ~ N
H
~
O J
~ • 0 I' iS ~ q
~ 2310 '
O- -
t
n
t e ; ♦ ~ p o
J~ `I 1 ~ e 174
t• ^ ' . ~a .r f .ip e t
i
:
Z
IJ 1, 4
l[ ~ Q ~
~ J
U l J
W R.
T n rn
, 1 1= U'►; 'L
~ .
~ - -
.
~ C-9
!
APPENDIX D
Letter Concerning Phased Operation of
the Sewage Treatment Plant from
_ Walker/McGough/Foltz/Ly,erla,
Architects and Engineers '
~ ~
WALKE R/McGOUGH /FOLTZ/ LYERLA, ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS
~ North 120 Wall, P O. Box 1482 Spolcane, Washington 99210 (509) 838-8681
~
March 21, 1975
Spokane County Building
Inspection Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Re: Safeco Insurance Company
S.awage Treatmz~t P1ant
Our Project #7433
Gentlemen:
The proposed Sewage Treatment Plant for Spokane Divisional
Office Building - Safeco Insurance Company has been sized to
acco.mmodate present and future loads as documented in previously
submitted environmental data.
In anticipation of the reduced loads expected during the
plant's early operation, our design gives the ability to reduce
the volume of introduced air thus permitting the plant to operate
in a normal manner.
If there are other questions concerning the plant's operation,
please give us a call.
Very truly yours,
WAI.KERJMcGOUGH/FOI.TZ/LYERLA
ARr ITECT ~Gordon E. RueManager of Architectural Services
GER: ph
cc: Mr. Hi 1 ary hieyerl e, Safeco
tr(4r. Tom Mosher, Haworth & Anderson
~
~
D-1
_
_ _
- _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _
- _ _ _
_ _
. . .
u
I
i
i
i
~
~a
~ ~
Q
~ ~X K
w i
,q
e~ :~r ~
" " " g,
5'.;
f„• C'':
a.
'7~y
w. 7'. fin,
1. ~
~ " ^.::r"R
. ~".i~'+ mt
1.
W "g,,.
n
„ r "
~ ~ ~ .
r
W~,
5
a, a,
wa
9
9'
:,N
y ~ C~: ~
~c" "
;s" a ~
c:
,X
~.X 1'
~ ~ s~
~ ,
P
~ „s:,
ti . fir.:,,
i~
Y- ",Q
,p. R
n ..a
cif .t g
a'~' S ,q.
w
y
@'.r
}
w
" " .~a
" _.,a...
r
a~Y r"
~ "
<i
. ,
r ~ ,d
" ~ ,
F..~ .r ,s
g,., dl. ':t ~ ,a ?
G~' " " "R94.
s~~
't
Rr ~ r
C~:
Y'~ C~
qq', ,5 ~6 ;2
r N -i, ~ ,3~, t9",
" .~...a: ~r
a" p( f,`
y, '..t
I
pp '.'8 p# 'n'
i'
`
!fi xy'
N;
''.X': d.N. J
~ Y:
!,i". Cl
p.::
6"''. y, r'
" h
~K
~y