The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1232-78 & ZE-142-78 • . :~E =~E• ~11,,,1 141 - S -cI S , ► a jJ's S ..'~s►'m j • i . ~ 17 7 . r• IS{ ' i , . . .?ECLARA?tON 0F Qroposed/final) No N~~G N ~ F~ clg,_~ c E ~ t signf ficance/nor►s i ficance 1 Description of Proaasai: 5u n 121 VISI oN QF Qjy ACRES rQ CR~„I~L ,IQ U NbLF FAM Lt.Y pWEL.~i j%_j e-.. S ~ 5E Y T'QNS pkt~p,) ~ Proponent• C O . 3. tentatt aericn: bAI%) i EL- jS C-LAMDhone: ca4 +~q 1 .r;:unty ac:ivn Reauested: Zone Change: wl_ areiiminar! Pla_ ApprovaT: Final Rlet approval: thange of ConciLion Dthtr: ~0 'WA O .:Co : ;On J' ?rbQOSEI : . ~ ~l1KLL7 r~L,Lr ~ " _eaa aq@riCy: S?OKf.ME COUIVTY, ',IASiiViGiON ihiz propASai has ~een determtned to NOr nave 3 significant adverse imoact on the envirortment. An c15 ~s hiQLl- r?OUirEd irid@!' RCW 43.21C.oQ77c!. this de[i5ion was Taee aftrr revi!wr 5y :ne "o4ntv ^f a:om- aei *.ed enviranmentni cnetktiSt and o:her ~nr'arTmt;on oh `ile •+ith :he lead ayency. . Responsible Jrfiic;al: PrORaSt'd .1eclaration: ;1nai "Dettaration: ';ar~e- FeE Q H~1~ Name ; Signature ~ 1 2 Siqnature {.C2 '+:le TI.ANAIING 1WRILtTOR 'icle ~ :eparunent „P-LANA~111-6 DEPT ~eoartment ~ace Q5.'r 01 a t e 3, For :"~ecjeracions of Si,;nir4tanCt Only: Jate of Fxpectad Draf*. EIS AvailaDility (deterYnined bv Responstble Otficial) Jate at Issuance TO 9E COMPlREO 8Y RESP4N5[BlE OFrICIAL: ' i. Srief 4e5CrzOLion and 'istlnq of •_hosa ?nvlrronmental irtoec:s leaalrtg :o suCh dec1trttion: o. ?rief exDlanation of rnat -vasures. any. could te =aKen by :he apollcbnc to )revenL ::r -71tiqata *.he envfroneental innact of the arooasal :o SUCh an ex:ent that :ne re5oans'Dle otfitfai cauid canssder i revi5ea crs7esa1 4i!h a -oasz'ble +-r.suiting Jec?ardC?+7n c' nonsifn!??C31'.G9: r "79 O(~,13 BOARD OF COUNTY COM111SSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTJN FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1232-78, SEXTON'S ADDITION ZE-142-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, The Spokane County Platting Hearing Examiner Committee did, after public hearing on October 31, 1975, take action by motion that the preliminary plat to be knovan as Sexton's Addition (File No PE-1232-78) be Denied, and, WHEREAS, Buddie L Cook, Valley Carter Co W 1014 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, 99206, did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the motion of the Hearing Examiner to the above described preliminary plat and zone reclassification, and, WfiEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on ~ December 6, 1973, to consider the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties, and, WHEREAS, At said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the con- clusions of the Hearing Examiner were generally valid and sufficient NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as Sexton's Addition and zone reclassification up- grading to Single-Family Residential should and hereby is Denied, with a further statement by the Board that this application, if referred back to the Hearing Examiner Committee, should be reconsidered with reduced density DATED TH I S ~ DAY OF ~z~~ , 197f ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON NARRY M. LARNED, CHM. RAY W. CNR f STEM JMY C. KOPET ATTEST U E Peo j W 0 H L .d"` . ° . . ° - . k of Bo r By . ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COPIMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IPd THE P1ATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUQDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO.'J ) PE-1232-78, SEXTON'S ADDITI0N, ) COMP1ISSIONERS' DECISIOid ZE-142-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE ) FAh1ILY RESIDENTIAL Sponsor - Cook ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Buddie L Cook, % Valley Carter Co , North 1014 Pines Road, Spokane, 4Jashington 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification, and The Spokane County Platting Hearing Examiner Committee having heard the above application on October 31, 1978, did deny said application, and The Board having conducted its oarn public hearing on December 6, 19785 at the request of the applicant, h1r Cook, and after visiting the site and reviewing tne testimony, and The 6oard being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to uphold the denial of the Hearing Examiner Committee and to refer said application back to the Hearing Examiner Committee for possible reconsideration of ±he proposal with reduced clensity The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter BY ORDER OF THE 80ARD this 18 day of Decernber, 1978 VERfdO,l W OHLAN~ Clerk of the Bo rd ~ l bY ~ sanne ~lontague, Deputy 'Cierk ~ E1V E E C DEC 2 J 1578 SpOKANE COUNI, PLANNING pEPARTMENT File No. PE-1232-78 ZE-142-78 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY ~ HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORnER A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on October 31,1978, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, Ted McCoury, and Eldon Thomas and there being the foliowing persons present who wish to request approval of a Preliminary Plat/Zone Change, Dan Clark representing Bud Cooke, Bud Cooke for a preliminary plat, Sexton's Addition, and a zone change from Agricultural to Singie-Family Residential the purpose of subdividing 9 4 acres into 30 lots for single family use B. FINDINGS OF FACT , 1 That the existing land use in the area is rural residential. - 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as suitable for residentw ~ ~ usage with no density designation , ' 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is , Agricultural ~ X o4. That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Poticy Act) , have been compl ied with. J 5 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item ~ have been fulfilled ~ 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- ' tion or intent of adopted policies 7 That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classifi,cation. a~r 1. . , File No PE-1232-78 ZE-142-78 8. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area. ~ 9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and wiil be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee a) The proposal would represent an intrusion of high density development into an area of rural residential uses and agricultural related activities b) It was found that conditions could not be adequately attached that would mitigate the adverse impact related to this plat proposal Specifically in regards to the existing Agricultural lifestyles and practices. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Buddie L. Cooke, o Valley Carter Co for a pre- liminary plat known as Sexton's Addition and zone change from Agricultural to Single-Family Residential as described in the application should be denied Motion by • McCou ry Seconded by Thomas Vote z to 1 Deny ~ 2. File No. PE-1232-78 ZE-142-78 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE A~ Chai rma ct- . , , ATT EST FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By : ~ 3. - ~ , • v ~ ♦ V SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CUMMISSIO\i APPEAL kEQUEST '~3RM `0 \SS`ON~~S Your name DatE ~ l Addre ss l2-, Phone No. ` Planniny Commissifln Actaon Bcing Appealed 4 Title . I. D Number 3:9- - ~rDatE of A c t i o n Signature ~ - ~ - • „ Your Reasons for Appcal e-? ; N i z v , J ~ . ~ , ~ ~ V SPOxANE COUNTY PLANN1 NG CC -MMISSIOI`d APP EAL REQUEST 'rORiv` J Your name ~ DatE I7 /L/ % 1.~~`'~ ~ ~~i,i~ r `f' Addre s s - P h Q ri C l~.j O. P.lanning Commission Action Beinq Appealcd . Title T r7-S /I I D Number /.')_1-2 - ~7Z Z-J'd Dat@ of Action , Signature Your Rea sons for Appeal re C A ♦ / , ^ i - G,J 11mu, cl ; 1 -7 , ~ r , r , ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 PE-1232-78 - SEXTON'S ADDITION ZE-142-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS I GENERAL INFORMATION. A. Location - Sexton's Addition is situated in the Spokane Ualley at the southeast corner of 4th Avenue and Long Road B. Proposal - 9 4 acres subdivided into 30 lots for single family use - Typical lot frontage = 80 ft. - Typical lot size = 80' x 130' (10,400 sq ft ) - Lots per gross acre = 3.19 lots per gross acre C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan - The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surroundinq lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Anal,ysis 1 - Existing Land Uses . - The proposed site currently contains one residence with the remainder of the property used as pasture Generally speaking, the site in question is surrounded by 2.5 to 5 acre parcels that contain rural residential uses and pastureland. - Directly north of the proposal, across nth Avenue,is the new Greenacres Elementary School which is slated to open in the next few weeks - Northwest of Sexton's Addition, near Spraaue Avenue and Long Road, are single family residences within a couple of older subdivisions that have a lot density of approximately 18,000 sq.ft. - Approximately 1/4 mile to the west of Sexton's Addition is the Apple Valley Estates subdivisions which are mobile home plats Nearly all lots within these plats are occupied by mobile homes It should be noted that residential mobile home uses are found on segregated parcels in the area between Apple Valley Estates and Sexton's Addition - To the northeast of the proposal there are three residential subdivisions with an average lot size of 13,500 sq ft., Moen Addition, Moen lst Addition and Windy Addition. 2 Compatibility with Existing Land Uses - The preliminary plat as presented calls for single family lots with a typical lot size of approximately 10,400 sq.ft. In general the immediate area is rural residential in nature with 2 5 to 5 acre parcels. Surrounding property which has been subdivided contains lots ranging from 13,500 sq.ft to 18,000 sq.ft. in size - 6A - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION GENERPL INFORMATION (Contd.) - Sexton' s Additi on woul d be cons istent vrith the new Greenacres E1 ementary School Traditionally, urban density developments have tended to locate in the immediate vicinity of school facilities. - At the present, there would appear to be no potential conflicts arising between this single family residential development and the residential mobile home developments to the west However, should the two areas develop further, it can be expected that land use conflicts could arise between the two uses. II SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation - The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and reports that the circulation pattern as shown is acceptable. However, he is requesting that the applicant dedicate an additional 10 feet of right- of-way along Long Road and 4th Avenue. The preliminary plat map indicates that the applicant intends to meet this condition The road Engineer has recommended other conditions that appear at the end of this analysis B Sewage Disposal - The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage disposal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, community septic tank disposal, and corrununity package treatment plant disposal. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District states that an on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 32 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments• Impact Discussion - a The plat sponsor has proposed 30 lots on 9 4 acres with a typical lot size of 80 by 130 feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b• In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane P,iver Ualley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: l. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. -6B- STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION II SPECIAL INFORMATION (Contd.) 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentra- tion, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of .52ppm A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of ,58 ppm Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics. . l. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology These systems are not currently economically avallable for this project. 2• Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora- tiun for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relativeTy poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. C Drainage - The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff However. final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing D Water Supply - The Proposal is located within the recorded service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19 - The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a deslre on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. -6C- . STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION II SPECIAL INFORMATION (Contd.) E Fi re Protecti on - The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #1 - The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final construction plans F Schools - Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #356 As was mentioned previously, the new Greenacres Elementary School is located at 4th Avenue and Long Road. The School District staff has reported that this new facility is scheduled to open in the very near future. G Parks - The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that the proposal is located in the Greenacres #5 neighborhood This neighborhood does not currently contain a park The report further indicates that as the neighbor- hood develops, a 16 acre community park would be required to serve the ne4ds of the neighborhood. The park would be located in conjunction with a proposed junior high school H Unique Environmental Features - The county survey has not revealed any unique environmental features in this a rea . I Cultural Resources - The staff reports that this area does not have any significant cultural resources. III ZONING ANALYSIS A. Existinq Zoninq - The proposed site and all adjacent property is currently zoned Agricultural. To the northeast of Sexton's Addition in Moen lst Addition and Windy Addition, Single-Family zoning is found. Two-Family Residential zoning occurs in Moen Addition. West of Sexton's Addition, in the Apple Valley Estates Subdivisions and surrounding area, Residential Mobile Home zoning has been approved. 6 Compatibility of Proposed Zoning with Existing Conditions - The applicant has proposed Single-Family Residential zoning in Sexton's Addition Given the preliminary plat and its land uses as proposed, as well as the Single and Two-Family Zoning occurring to the northeast, it would be appropriate to upgrade the zoning to Single-Family Residential should the plat be approved. - 6D - . > , STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDTTION IV ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - An Environmental Checlclist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmentalimpacts were judged to exist - Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories earth, air, water, flora, noise, light and glare, land use, population, housing, transportation/circulation, public services and utilities - The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as ref erenced in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard CGnditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats", August 1977, Spokane County Flanning Department NOTE Any amendments to said conditions are stateu sPparately and listed hereafter - P-l, P-21 P-33 P-4, P-5, P-6, P-75 P-81, P-9, (Novemher l, 1979) P-13 . - E-l, E-25 E-3, E-4, E-55 E-6 A-1 H-l, H-5. Special Conditions • l. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ~CTIO'; pursuant to 43.21C 080 RC4J and the Board of County Commissioner's Resoluti-vn No 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within (30) days formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instructed by the Planning Department Staff 2. That upon filing of the final plat, the zorinn be reclassified to Single- Finaily Residential 3. That the project sponsor may not be noti fi Ed ~y the Heari no Fxami ner Comr>> ttee of the need t-c request an extension of timou fvti- t.he renev:al of any prel irinary plat approval granted by the Board of County Gommissioners 4 That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain t~e issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuarcr- of a final declaration of Non- Significance. 5 That a public water system serviced by CQnsolidated Irrigation District #19, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 6. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 32 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. - 6E - , ' , ✓ • STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION V. CONDITIONS (Contd ) 7. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 8 That access permits be required for driveway approaches 9. That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer 10 That the applicant dedicate 10 feet additional right-of-way along Long Road and 4th Avenue. r - 6 F - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COuiiTY COMMISSIOfdERS OF SPOKA14E COUNTY, WASI-IINGTON IN THE MATTER COPJCERNING PRELIPlINARY ) SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) splifinI J. ' ►,NWS FI MW ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZE-142-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE ) FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SPONSOR: COOK ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEiV that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1.30 P.M ON DECEMBER 6, 1978, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property. Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 E W31 Lots 7& 8, Block 28, Corbin Addition to Greenacres, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 19 SE corner of 4th Avenue and Long Road NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIUEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF TWE BOARD this 13 day of November, 1978. VERNOP1 W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD . B i..-i; ,l ' Rosanne Montague, Deputy Clerk STANDA}~~ ~~~DI~~~S FOR .A-PF ROVAL~ OF PRE L:I Mi ~ ARY PLAT S A~~gust 1, I977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DE~ARTTvfENT i SPOKA~~ ~OUNTY PLANNIING COMMTSS.~ON . ~ STANDARD C~~'vD1T1~_ f'(;t~ r'1AF'itc';t'A?. .1i' Sf'OICAi~E i.1".~'"V L~Ei,:~RT'N?F;.l'r A_c,rnc;.r~~•r r1 TTr•"t-.' rt . . . . , C _ ~ f ~ . P~'I 1: ( :1. I I'. . ~ ~ •J ~ . F`13:111111~_( CiJIl1R1154i 'r-i: I l:i'.o '.i L: : ~1„f`f : _,1.•. , . I ..:i•_ l... i , .t ...•a~. .:lt .:'.L::~1' ing structure re placed on any ar:e lot, nor shall any lat pe fur[ller subdivldec ourposes of creatsng additianal lots or building sites wlthout flling a replat. (F-That the pla' pmv'sc?e lor rinht :vav :ti•idth f:,r stree*!~ as inriicated (-,n the TI;:c9i approprtate j-•fGV151")I: :?E.' i.lif3i It.~ Tr:L):'.'..:u CieSCfiLed pf.:pBC:' .:E' f:L._ :i. :1 .i Antil the continuatton of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all strsets that terminate or barder the plat baunciary. (Temporar-7 cul de sac-s arc requireci when streets terminate at thQ plai koundartes.) lP-5) That appropriate stree►t narnes be indicated. 7'i:at approprfate utillty ease-nents be indiGated on copies of the aoproved preliminary plat far distributio;- tc"i th? Plann!nn Dep?t-'ment arid the utility cnrr.pan[es . Wrl*ten ap- proval af t.he f:. ( f~ . .'JE?- '~1• i'.:cl~ i)!•i' IC~~_' I c_:t ;.a F: 1....!'.. j}: . '1'. _I:,jl. • f~t_ ..'ii~.• - pl;er and f!re protectton district. Sald :vater p-1an must alsv izuve been appraved by _hc• appr7priate health authorIties. The health auihartties, water supplier (purveyor), and :ire prntection distrxct will certify, prior to the filing Qf the flnal olat, on the face of ;aid water plan that the plan !s in conformar.ce w!th their requtrements and will ade- quately satisfy their resper!ive needs. S-: id u•ater aIan and certificatlon will he draft- ed an a CIc3C15pc1iBrlCy suitat~._;_- T!:=~ p u:-:c,, -r;•..Il :cI - lp r.-,: --i.:.c: _ : t'~~• i:n~ :pf {D ;cI.. _hat appropriaee contractual arrangements have been made wlth the plat spunsar far cvn- trucuon of the water system,:n accordance wlth the apgroved plan, and in accnrdance .Vtth a time schedule. The ti►ne yChedule wlll prov:de, !r. 3ny caie, for completlor. of .~:e water system and Lnspectlon by the apprapri3te nealth authorities pr4or to applica- •i~)n far buclding perm:ts wiLhin the plat. The cantractual arrangements cvill. inctude a ::~r:)vlsion halding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from clalms by any !.cit Durcnaser refused a building perrrlt due to the fatlure of the plat sponsor to satisfactor- . The plat r!ed!Cdtic,r: :v_I1 13i31G:'iC11_ :J,•~ effec: uhat the public wate; sySie:i. as appravec by County and State Health author:cies and the local fire dtstrict and pur- : cyor will be installed wlttiin thls plat, and the surdivider wlll provlde Eor indlvtdual ~iomestic water service as well as fire pmtection to each lot prlor to sale of each lot. T'Iat a cert:flcate of t:tle hn fiirrishec3 thP P}inninq Departmer:*, prior t-) *:,e f0ir.n 7if :i~e iinal rl~~t . f).~i t;P ~7"_'i~i; r;•l'll~:~'i:,~ ';p111 -Vai t . That the scatus af the parcel irt ti-,c ss he indicated on the fi.nal plat and in ihe dedlcatio:z, acid that tiie staff lie allowed to ,•:r,: ;ri!F- the :.p,--i•is')r ~-deterrr:inp its best use and future stattts. (C' ~n± ~ n~~~~r31 I ' . . ~ STANDARD COhIDI'FIONS FdR APPfbGVAI. OF FREIdMIh'ARY PIAiS . "I%Gi~;RN~ L1.v,P:TY i'I A'•tiNiti, DEI'Af?"=r3E:+~T r, cc~-;~~.~:~;E CnUNn' ~r;.~!~,;*~;Tn;~; t~r~?,•?~.:?SS?~~~i'},~ ,_r'tl.•v.'1::CS lit?[?15 are c2:atec: t._j t;ie s& a) The sponsor shall submit the praposed form of the legal documenis ior cantint-led retentlon, clevelopment, and msl.ntenance of all aammr.►n open space land prior .o the filirrg of [he final plat; which ducumerits shall provide, amnng other thar, far a minirnum assessment o# members of a home owners' assacia:ian for s. clpen space development and maintenar.ce, =aid - - • ' ' • ' the Flanninq Director prior to ftling of tFe i!nal p! E-;) The areas shown as recreaiion area and/ot slte, e-_, .:c• : :<<~.- and given lot and hfock mamk►ers. The ifnal plat will show the future owmcr- ci-3*uS )f r._.rr^e1'; f'7 bp SnICI. 1ti~rcPlS f1 r+7-*!13'TS t7t'blic fi .e. , SpwE`!' f.!'f?a! - (11t~::t of 4l1c- CJ1iiiUi:lt1 Oj7c:11 Sj1ciCE; l:i, :(1: SUi:ti Ir:iprover::Gi':LS V:i!1 lie ciCC:.-,i;P115; ' at the sponsor's exgense and shall tnclud4 proper guarantee of minicnum sta: - a-ds of improvement (for example: EUffii>cj ~-;r: _-?e~,,,?~ :nr~.,~-';r~~, .~t•:~•~_~~r ~ , shall be apprQVed by the Planntng Dire< r) I> a final plat is tn be fi2ed that daes n_;: .;~~.._c;r t,; ct•- . r,lattincr mty the pre!lminary ola*_ of recnrr?, then the f4rsc firri: r`:!r-cl c:~l! - i , - , • _ . , , . ' _ way r,iust bE received fruni tne StatE i-Lyhway Deparnient priar :o filiny ;,i L:.e plat. 112) That an avigafiion easement satisfactory to rhe Spokane Aicport IIoard L•e pr3v the benefit fairctitlr. Ajr F(-rcp Aase and Sprykane IntcrnationaI AirT,.-}r!. Ti1?t td.eClt3!'dtlc-Cl -)f rv?:i-.Sigl11{cCcifSCe J@ j5S11@d, jfl .:CC'.o[dd^CE: %1'it.'1 ~t?CCl:-::: 1 1.15 . ,40 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) priar to approval of thfs :E2c--mimendation by the Board of County Cammissianers, or that any apprcvinn action vi tPie Board be condltioned upan Issuance of Final Declaratlon ai Non-Sic.tnificance in accardance w[th SCEO 11. 15.390. NOTE: The offlcial flle cantains an envtmnmental checklist for the proposal and a staff revteK• :.-if ?lZe11 Ct3e'Ck!1Si as :equire,j by WAC 197-10-320. Ii . ~r.t~inc~r's (l- 1) Znat canditiona.l appmval of the plat fc given sijbiect to the deriicat:an of right of war to the publtc and approval of the raad system lr-, the ntat by tht- :'nunty rr.glneer. (F.- 2) That plans, profiles, and crass sectlans showing proposed street centerline 3nd ourb grades 1e submitted to the Caunty £nqineer fQr approval pri4r ta constructsQn and tht filirtg ni a final plat. (E- 3) ThaE drainage plans and design caJculations showing the grades and alignment of draln- age facllities be submittEd to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final p!at. (C- 4) Constructton within the pcvposed publlc streets and easements shall be performed under the dlrect supervision of a lfcensed land surveyar, who shall be responsible for Ferpet- uatinq ail evidence of the Iacation of stirvey monuments which may be distrubed durinq oonstructlon and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a ccrti- ficate in writlna thac all tmprovements were installed to the llnes and grades shnwn on Lhe approved constructlan plans anct that a11 disturbed manumer►ts have teen replaced. (E- 5) No constructic+n work !s ta be performed with ihe Public Riqht of Way unLil a permit has been issued by the County Enginaer. A11 work is subject to Inspection and approvai by t?:e County Engineer. . . 1 I':t':DA f:L} T,.S UtFy:~~'r't:;~~ ~~T (7.1'I(1ti1TV .'T.r1i,11,,71M,: (E - f~) Al1 C:UI15Il"UC[l"JC: w3*iliit ,i:e ~~i:I:~:C: tZ:q::i ~'1%c:\% .S l"y!E' C:..:ijJ~iit't:S ~J!1:lt lJ li~lll~~ C:~ i11':~31 pla[ or a nond in the amount esumated by tne County Engineer to cover *.ne cOtt Or .r.on- ;truction ef tmprovements, constrLIctinn certiftcation, "As i,:_;:' ;_!1:~~, ~~:.-:~.:~:,_::c•±•.,; EE- i~'_1 .I:r'.'t -f~~."~.. 1_ f , . .lif..- - ' ~i.!t, ~.._;t_~ . l:C~. L.....' .1; -;l[:•.:i~. .~U~ I l_j,.>, , . ways are dedicatec and rnads are established as C;aur.ly RQacls. (E- 8) No direct access from lots to Stub Raad cvnnections umtil s>>ch rn3:;s are t- County Standards and establlshed as Gounty Roa.:'.:, . ~ (E- ~1' Road design, rough grading construction, and dra:=.~:a,ae c-~:tr::! :c: 1.'~ : i~~~*s ~-~f ~vays and Stub Raad connectiDn~: arr• the r-f 'h. rlovei~per. (E-1C!) 'ritst tlie 51x.,c;3or s11al1 pre^are a;lcl t"le C'=unLy i.ayineer ades.ign proposa' aC- ceptable to the State Hiqhway Department of the pmposed StaLe Highway-County Road lntsrsectlon. State Hlghway Department approval of the praposed design musi be re- ceived prior to the filinq of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are co be the raspansibillty of the sponsor and may either be r_onstructed pr a bond to covQr the cnsc M such improvements furnished tn the County Enhtneer ir. the amaunt as deterrnined by r}-t? C-,ljraty rrnc,.,reer and the State 1+1._1D('C'3rt'*!ewL. III, Ac-zsessor ('1- 1) That 4 rlame be indica*,ed befc>rc- ,1:.-- cinal p',~t tz, ii'•ee:- sucl: nar,- b---, the Ct>unty As=essor and the i~%. I-:~:alt~~ r?eparrn;e,t (N-1) That each lot be authorized foc the use of IndtvldUal ort-alte sewage dtsposal systems. (i:-2) The dedlcatory language af the plat will state the aponsor wUl assume no resgonstbtl- itv fnr oro-.,lstc~r: ,-)i darl2sttc w-:r,_.r. ~i. ~ ~cr tc ,:.rc>~~!~tc:._ ~_~i•:llc sewer ! - ? ' (~1-3) ''ha: ca~'~~it!ons ,~~.:prc_~•.-,-: ,,F -=~.vc-. S~ . system. Approval of the design of said systems rnust bL glvan by Gounty and State Iiealth authorities and the County Utlltttes Department grlor to filing of the final p!nt. A sultable guarantee wt!l be requiced to cover the cost oF providlnq sa►.d system fn t!:e amount as determined by the Public Works Departme *,c . I (I-:-4) 'Thai a statement be placed in the dedlcation to the eiicct tha~. an-:.it:!ic :e!r:er svster.1 wtll be made aval!able far the plat and tndtvidual service will be provided tn each loc prior !o sale. (11-5) Prior ca *iiiny of the ftnal -Aat, r_=:c• sponsor shall present evidenca t'7at the plat lles withir-, the recosded service araa oi the pcoposed water dtstrlct. (T1- C~) That an on-slte sewage managetnent system be created and appcoved by the Spokane ~4(~,3Ith i?ls}rlct, prlnr tc, f(llrict of r.he "inal Plat. ~ ' Y~ ~ •J , 6 OC-f °b . ^ ~ - 11/ t..,-~~~ • J r .~U i 4~~~ ~..~-•'Z~ . n ✓ J ~ ~ • / . l.~ - La ~ ~~l ~t.i~✓~a'` , , ~ 4~• vr ~A 1 ~1L~ 1 ~•0 ? / ! n ~ • t; ~ ' j,6" ~ . . ~ ~I V&z ' ~ , i --t • , „ • o /O -07' rI?j dt,C-L GC-q~`L~ ~ ` ~~t.e, ~ ~~`Z•~- .,.t.c~ G~~ J ` ~ Jr , '~.I~~'~~/~ / .i~i~~~~~ ~ O ~ ~++VL ✓ ~ ~ ~"V ~A • i ~.~G.. •~7~C~~ ~ ~IV ~ ah.k, ..,ltAtj . ~ ~r7 ~.rC, ~lJ(r~~ ~ ~ ~ J ` r . .3 v ~a,.~ , ~ o ✓~u~-r~ ~ V V , 1 . - ' _ . ~ \ t 1 - J L44avt,C~~ Cr, L~~ 4L aa~ 6 . ~ ~ ~ . R • , "X ~ ~~~'L~ L~ i"'7 ~(7'L~ ~ L~~~ w ~ U ,~t~ tT.Ct.t.~ e • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ . ~ LAAL t.l~ 5POKANE VALLEq FIRE DtPARTIAEN-T - ~ ~~l~p w / EASt 10319 Sf'i2AGUE AVE e SPOKANf, WASMINGTON 99206 o TELEPHONE (1-09) 928-1700 dctober 25, 1978 Mr Frec! Dayharsh, P1 anni ng D1 rector Spokane County Planning Commiss7on North 811 Jefferson Spokcane, Washinyton 99201 Dea r Mr Dayha rs h The l'oliowiyig prel7minary suo~iyi§ions and zone class7fication for upgradi ng has been reviewqd for fire protection , t ~ PE-1229-78 141i 1 i ams E5tites 9 ? - PE-1231-78 Smitli`s Adoition ZE- 141-78 Crick , PE-1232-78 Sexton's Addition , ZE- 124-78 Coo4c (c/o VaI1 e,y Carter Co) I PE-1234- 78 Orcha rd Gardpns, 2'-*nd Add -itifln ZE- 147-78 Crosby Ila iris and hydrants need to be ins #~.al l ed i nth is area. Acces s pi ans for firefi ghti ng equi pment arowad the bui1 ding, sha11 be approved pr ior to bui l ding permi t iss uat'tc'e, PE-1233-78 Sun Acres Additzan ZE- 143- 78 Fox- Ma7 ns and hydrants oeed to be ins tal 1 ed i n thi s . area Access pl ans for fire-fighting equi pment around the bu71 ding sliall be approved prior ta bui i ding permi tissuance Th1s p1at to ' be di sapproved if not annexed tQ Vera Water & Power r A1 Coo i< Lt of Inspectors AC sn ECEIVED-, , oc T9 - 1978 , + sPOKANE cauNT~ _ NG DEPARTf~ENT P.~EV~-, ~N~' ~'IRES S.~ VE 1~ ATS ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 PE-1232-78 - SEXTON'S ADDITION ZE-142-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS I. GENERAL INFORMATION. A Location - Sexton's Addition is situated in the Spokane Valley at the southeast corner of 4th Avenue and Long Road. B. Proposal - 9.4 acres subdivided into 30 lots for single family use - Typi cal 1 ot frontage = 80 ft. - Typical lot size = 80' x 130' (10,400 sq ft ) - Lots per gross acre = 3 19 lots per gross acre C Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan - The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation D Land Use Analysis l. - Existing Land Uses - The proposed site currently contains one residence with the remainder of the property used as pasture. Generally speaking, the site in question is surrounded by 2.5 to 5 acre parcels that contain rural residential uses and pastureland - Directly north of the proposal, across nth Avenue,is the new Greenacres Elementary School which is slated to open in the next few weeks - Northwest of Sexton's Addition, near Spraaue Avenue and Long Road, are single family residences within a couple of older subdivisions that have a lot density of approximately 18,1000 sq.ft. - Approximately 1/4 mile to the west of Sexton's Addition is the Apple Valley Estates subdivisions which are rrobile home plats Nearly all lots within these plats are occupied by mobile homes. It should be noted that residential mobile home uses are found on segregated parcels in the area between Apple Valley Estates and Sexton's Addition - To the northeast of the proposal there are three residential subdivisions with an average lot size of 13,500 sq.ft , Moen Addition, Moen lst Addition and Windy Addition. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses - The preliminary plat as presented calls for single family lots with a typical lot size of approximately 10,400 sq.ft. In general the immediate area is rural residential in nature with 2 5 to 5 acre parcels. Surrounding property which has been subdivided contains lots ranging f rom 13,500 sq ft. to 18,000 sq.ft in size. - 6A - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION GEyEUL INFORMATION (Contd.) - Sexton' s Addi ti on woul d be cons istent aii th the new Greenacres El ementary School Traditionally, urban density developments have tended to locate in the immediate vicinity of school facilities. - At the present, there would appear to be no potential conflicts arising between this single family residential development and the residential mobile home developments to the west However, should the two areas develop further, it can be expected that land use conflicts could arise between the two uses II SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation - The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and reports that the circulation pattern as shown is acceptable. Hoarever, he is requesting that the applicant dedicate an additional 10 feet of right- of-way along Long Road and 4th Avenue. The preliminary plat map indicates that the applicant intends to meet this condition The road Engineer has recommended other conditions that appear at the end of this analysis B Sewage Disposal - The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage disposal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, community septic tank disposal, and corrununity package treatment plant disposal. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District states that an on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 32 dwelling units are authorized within the plat The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 30 lots on Q 4 acres with a typical lot size of 80 by 130 feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane P,iver Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: l. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. - 6B - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION II SPECIAL INFORMATION (Contd.) 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots," vjill be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentratlon expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1 The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mgJl above the natural background - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentra- tion, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 52ppm A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8 6 percent would result in a range of .58 ppm Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics. 1 Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economical]y available for this project 2• Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora- tiun sor liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventlonal subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor comnunity acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septlc tanks and drainfields. C Drainaqe - The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates th6t on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff However. final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing D Water Supply - The Proposal is located within the recorded service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19 - The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. - 6C - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (Contd.) E Fire Protection - The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #l. - The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final construction plans F Schools - Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Ualley School District #356 As was mentioned previously, the new Greenacres Elementary School is located at 4th Avenue and Long Road The School District staff has reported that this new facility is scheduled to open in the very near future. G. Parlcs - The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that the proposal is located in the Greenacres #5 neighborhood This neighborhood does not currently contain a park The report further indicates that as the neighbor- hood develops, a 16 acre community park would be required to serve the needs of the neighborhood. The park would be located in conjunction with a proposed junior high school H. Unique Environmental Features - The county survey has not revealed any unique environmental features in this area I Cultural Resources - The staff reports that this area does not have any significant cultural resources III. ZONING ANALYSIS A Existing Zoning - The proposed site and all adjacent property is currently zoned Agricultural To the northeast of Sexton's Addition in Moen lst Addition and Windy P,ddition, Single-Family zoning is found Two-Family Residential zoning occurs in Moen Addition. West of Sexton's Addition, in the Apple Valley Es±ates Subdivisions and surrounding area, Residential Mobile Home zoning has been approved. B. Compatibility of Proposed Zo ning with Existing Conditions - The applicant has proposed Single-Family Residential zoning in Sexton's Addition Given the preliminary plat and its land uses as proposed, as well as the Single and Two-Family Zoning occurring to the northeast, it would be appropriate to upgrade the zoning to Single-Family Residential should the plat be approved - 6D - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION IV. ENUIRONMENTAL REVIEW - An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmertalimpacts were judged to exist - Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories earth; air, water, flora, noise, light and glare, land use; population, housing, transportation/circulation; public services and utilities. - The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. U COND IT IONS _ If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as ref erenced in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standar` Concitions for Approval of Preliminary Plats", August 1977, Spokane County Flanning Department NOTE Any amendments to said conditions are stated serarately and listed hereafter - P-l, P-2, P-35 P-4, P-5, P-63 P-79 P-8, P-9, (Nlcvem(-?cr l, 1979) P-13 - E=1, E-2, E-3, E-4; E-5, E-6. A-l. H-l, H-5. " Special Conditions 1. That the provi si ons of SEPA' S NOTICE OF ArTION pursuant to 43 21 C 080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resoluticn N0 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within (30) days ^f l'ormal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminar.,/ plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. 2. That upon filing of the final plat, the zorinc be reclassified to Single- Finaily Residential 3 That the project sponsor may not be notificd hy the Hearino Examiner Comrlittee of the need tc ~equest an extension of timie fo~- 'Ch2 renev:al of any prelirinary plat approval granted by the Board of County Commissioners. 4 That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain t3he issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuancr- of a final declaration of Non- Significance 5 That a public water system serviced by Consolidated Irrigation District n19, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 6 That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 32 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. - 6E - d r STAFF ANALYSIS - October 27, 1978 SEXTON'S ADDITION V. CONDITIONS (Contd.) 7. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facillties be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 8. That access permits be required for driveway approaches 9 That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer 10. That the applicant dedicate 10 feet additional right-of-way along Long Road and 4th Avenue - 6F - r - ~ . a AGENDA, OCTOBER 27, 1978 TELEPHONE. 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Time. Frtday, October 27, 19789 8.30 A.M. Place Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor West 1201 Broadway, Spokane 8:30 A.M. A. 1. Planning Commission Concerns 2. Other Business B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIUISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME Page 1 PW-1095-77, GRIFFIN ADDITION (Agricultural Zone - no change requested) EDGAR 1 2. PN-1145-77, NORTH MEADOWS ADDITION ZN- 165-77, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN RICHNER 2 3. PW-1096B-77, INDIAN VILLAGE ESTATES ' ZW- 62-77, UNCLASSIFIED to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TAYLOR 2A C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. PE-1227-78, HOMESTEAD ZE- 202-789 AGRICULTURAL, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL to SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, LOCAL BUSINESS, COMMERICAL AND RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL MAIN 3 12.00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing) 1.30 P.M. Reconvene D. PRELIMItJARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 4. PE-1229-78, WILLIAMS ESTATES (Agricultural Zone - no change requested) W.R.S. ASSOCIATES 4 5. PC-1231-78, SMITH'S ADDITION ZE- 141-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CRICK 5 6. PE-1232-78, SEXTON'S ADDITION L-,--. ZE- 142-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COOK (c/o Valley Carter Co.)........... 6 continued- ~E /-z- ) ~ AGENDA, October 27, 1978 TELEPHONE NO 456-2205 SPOKANE COUPdTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER Time• Friday, October 27, 1978 - 1 30 P M(Item 3 on afternoon agenda) Place Broadway Centre Building 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICAITOPJ Agenda PE-1232-78, SEXTON'S ADDITION Item ZE-142-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SIUGLE-FAP1ILY RESIDENTIAL 6 a Location. Section 19, Township 25, Range 45 E W M Lots 7« 8, Block 28, Corbin Addition to Greenacres, located in the NE 1/4 of Sec 19 b Sponsor Buddie L Cook % Valley Carter Co N 1014 Pines Road Sookane, WA 99206 c Surveyor Daniel B Clark E 419 Sprague Spokane, WA. d Site Size 9 4 acres e Number of Lots 30 lots f. Proposed Land Use: Single-Family dtiyellings g. Existing Zoning Agricultural (establisned 7/30/57) h. Proposed Zoning Single-Family Residential i Water Source Consolidated Irrigation District #19 i School District Central Valley District 7#356 k. Method of Seviage Disposal Individual Septic Tanks l. Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact u :Ul ' ~ , - U) ST OFFi . o . ~ M N = U N • G~ n ~ er o JR ~ 00 , ~ P P r 1' 0 t i , . • EL 204 ~ p . co~" ~ a ~ - ~ • E ~ 2►+d Av N Y tr SC A F s aa ~ ~ Q U T ,~a~ AvE O a 1 t Page 6 o~ i ~ eTN P.v ¢ ~E! GNT H AV E - , ;ITI 172 173 174 • 175 17617717 9 181 182 183 184 185 18 ~ ~ I . OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dart~ QcAobc 9 19Z~ : Inter-office Communicotion t E To PLANI`l I NG COIrMI S S I ON R E C E I V From GARY RENNALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER1401w It • OCT 17 1978 Sub jectRQAA CONDIT IONS # FOR PE f2 3 ExTon/'S &aL r,/a A/ S,p n K A N F C 0 l1 NIY #CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION p(.ANNING DEPARTMENT (E 1)- that conditfonal approval of the plat fs given ecsbject tm dedi,eatfoeu of Rigitt of Tflay to the pu5lic and approval of the road syste.a in the plat by the County Er~~~~r-, E 2 that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerZiae and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constructi,on and the filing of a final plat; E 3 that drain$oe pIans and design calculatioas shocring the grades and a►liguatest of drain- age iac3li[ies be subsitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constrnctfon and the filfng of a final plat; , (E 4} cons truction within the proposed public streets and easements ahall be perfozmed under tha direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who ahall be respoasible for pArpetuating all evidence of ths location of survey monumeats which may be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish th2 County Engineer with "As ~Built" plans and a certificate in Writing that gll improvements were iastalled to the lines and grades shocm on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monu_aents have been replaced; - (E S/Lno construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way antil a peruit has been issued by the County zngineer. All Work is Bubject to inspection and approval by the County En3ineer; acress PerM,is rcSutre dqo. d r,rec,va y q~ppro a clcc s, E 6 all cons tzuction wf thin the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior tm fiting the f inal plat or a bond in ths amount es tia.ated by the County Engineer to cover the cost oi con3truction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and ^ionw-nsnting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engimaer. F 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as ndditional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. . E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads ere constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. E 9-road design, rough grading construction, and drainage con[rol for 1/2 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. E I O -[hat the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Roed inter- section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover che cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the StAte Highway Department. (F, ll~that a11 roads within the plat be curbed andAM paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved andjM curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. E-12-no direct accesa from lote to ~-13~edication of T'~N additional Right of Way alongZOATID_,E E-14-that the oWner, hia granteee and aeeigne agree to participate in and not oppose or prote at and R ID on ~ ~ 4o~a~E CpGy~ rr ` SPOKANE COUNTY H ~ALTN DISTRICT Inter- O f fi ce C o r r~ica ti on q~lH p~s1 . Date : Aangust 1, 1978 T0: S ne County anni gomsmissi i 1 ' t7 -fr-C V a as A)V) R lc I IV FROM: ~u e ne harp ~ d Eu gein . Prat er, R.S. U OCT 13 1975 SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary pbat - SEXTON'S ADDIaION SPOKANE COUNTY t. References. . PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT a. Map of subyect, scale 1" W 600' by Adams, Berathin & Clark; undated, seceived by this of f ice July 18, 1978. b. Groumd-IJater Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Coesnties of W~shington, Departmeatt of Water Ite- sources, State of Washingtmn, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quaiity in the Spokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208, tqater Resources Study - Metso- politan Spokane Itegion, U.S. Asmy Goxps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Searvey, Spok.ane County, Washington, Soil Cmnservation Serdice, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering anterpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Sesvice, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of CID District wells in Township 25, Range 45, Section 19. g. Field Suxuey Report, Gene Shaxp, Spokane County Health District, July 20, 1978. h. Map: Gxeenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane NE, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This prmject lies in a relatively flat area bounded on the West by Lomg Road, on IVorth by Fousth Avenue, on the Soutta by Sixth Avenee and on the tJest by a point 651' feet West mf Long. Local dsainage Eyays axe fnsigni- f icanto It is located over the Spokaxae Valley Aquif es . b. Surface soils axe classed as Gaxsison gravelly loam with 0t0 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filtes £ield limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Ceologically the smils ase glaciof luvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace xemnants have probably been sework.ed by streaans. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large ammunts of water. SCHD-ADM-118 , ' . ~ August 1, 1978 Page 2 SextAn's Add. d. The data from a CID well in the area shows the total nitrogen content to be .52 ppm. The CID Water District has indicated that it can supply dAmestic use water for the plot upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 30 lots on 9.4 acres. Each lot is to be serded by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disp- osal systenc. This raises the qttestioan of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the axea and possible alternatives £or secaage disposal. b. In the course of the cond~~t of the Axmy Coxps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundcyater, and the ~ffect of ~ontinued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In nmrmal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment ef£luent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sex3age effluent will be carried to the grmauncicvater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly remomed by the deep soil layer abode the groundcyater and "minor dissolved constituenti~ such as phosm phates, which are knoFan to react Eaith soil particles, or nitrates, cahich ase takean up by plant roots" saill be less than the total found in septic tank ef£luents. (3) "The caiculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/b (milligrams per litex) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 ma,.yimum incremental concentsation is 101 mg/t above the natural background."---"The analytical resultsr of the fosecast impact of year 2020 when coars- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leach2te volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currentb„ results of chemical analysis shoca the t4ta1 nitrogen contgnt o£ the groundiiater as in the range of .52 ppm. A prmjected incre- mental increase usimg Ar. Todd's expected 8.6 pexcent would result in rarages to .58 ppm. Curremt Federal and State drinkimg water standards permit up to 10 ppm, d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the £ollowing general chaxacteristics: ~ At1guSt 1. 1978 P1ge 3 Sexton' s Add. (1) Gollector and central tre~~ment systems dischaxging to surf ace waters w-ould reqenire at least testiary treatment and perhpps more to obtain a pea-mit for the dischas"ge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not cursently economicalZl.y adai1able f or this pxojectk. (2) Sealed systems, whether individuab or community, depend on evaporation for liquid reanoval. Some, such as 1a- goAns, have safety hazards associated T-Ath them and se1atively poos community aESeptance. 4. Recoumend that: a. Ttae plat dedisation will contain a statemeant tm the e£f ect tknat:"The public ciates system as approved by County and State Health authoxities and the local f ire district and pua-deyox ciill be installe~ tyithin this plat, and the sub- ~ divider will provide for indididual doanestis wates service as well as fire psotection to each lot pxior to sale of each bot," b. The dedicatory language of the plat wilb state that each lot is authosized ~ the use of an individual on-site seEyage disposal system. c. An on-site sewage management system be cxeated ared approded by this office prior to the signing of the £ina11 plat if more than a total ~ of thirty-two (32) dwelling units are authorized within the p1aLr. d. A plan for t-yater facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic ixrigation use and fire pacotection use staall be approeed by the water supplier. Said cyatex pban mustk kaave been appxoded by tkae f ixe protection distxist and the appropriate health authoxigies. The heal th authosities, tyater supplier (Puveyor),and f ise prmtectiom district will certifY, Prior to the f iling ~ o£ the final plat, on trhe face of said ciatrer plan that the plan i.s in con- foxmance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said watex plam and certif ication will be dxaf ted on a transparency suitable £ox reprmductioau. ~ cc: Adlams , Benthin & Clask E. 419 Sgrsague . CAST 419 SPRAGUE AVENUE TELEPHONE 624 6915 SPOKANE, WASH 99202 ADAIVIS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS Ju ly 18, 1978 SEXTONS ADDITION Preliminary Plat Sewer Feasibility Study Location, Topography, Soi ( and Water This project lies in the Spokane Valley at the southeast corner of Long Road and 4th Avenue in Block 28 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington. The land is flat and open with no peculiar topographic features. The soil is classified by the Soil Conservation Service As Garrison Gravelly Loam (GgA). This area is served with water by Consolidated Irrigation District. Scope of Proj ect This proposal involves the subdivision of 9.4 acres into 30 single family lots, eoch of approximately 11,500 square feet. Sewerage Alternatives Following is a brief analysis of three alternative means of sewage disposal for the project: Individual on-site sewage disposal systems (septic tank-drainfield) This type of sewage disposal would involve the installation of 30 individual septic fionk-drainfield systems. The per unit cost of this system, based on• (1) a 50 year life; (2) drainfield replacement after 25 years; (3) pumping septic tanks at 4 year intervals, and (4) inspection at 2 year intervals, is estimated to be $5,850/lot. This includes all installation and maintenance costs for the 50 year period at todays dollar value. The positive aspects of this type of sewage treatment for this project are: (1) low initial installation cost, (2) dispersal of sewage treatment effluent over a wide-spread area. (n our opinion the danger of ground water pollution is increased, in this type of gravelly soil condition, by methods which concentrate effluent discharge; (3) relatively low maintenance cost and low rate of failure. cont..... Page 2 July 18, 1978 Sextons Addition Prelim. Plat Sewer Feas. Study Community drainfield system with individual septic tanks This type of system would involve the installation of 30 septic tanks. Sewage effluent would be piped from each tank through a collector system to a community drainfield. The per unit cost of this system based on (1) a 50 year (ife; (2) drainfield replacement after 25 years; (3) pumping septic tanks at 2 year intervals and (4) inspection at 1 year intervals, is estimated to be 57,675/1ot. This again includes al) installation and mainten- ance costs for the 50 year period at todays dollar value. The positive aspects of this type of sewage treatment for this project are• (1) low initial installotion cost; (2) relatively moderate maintenance costs. One negative aspect of this type of system is the concentrafiion of sewage effluent discharge. This is of major concern in the Spokane Valley at this time and, as stated above, it is our opinion that the danger of ground water pollution is increased by this type of system. Package fireatment plant This type of sewage disposal would involve the installation of o smalf package treatment system serving 30 lots. Raw sewage would be piped from each house to a central site where it would be treated, with effluent discharged into a drainfield system. The per unit cost of this system based on: (1) a fifty year life and (2) continua) maintenance by a municipal operating entity, is estimated to be $15, OOO/Iofi. A I I costs were aga i n computed for th e enti re 50 year period at todays dol lar va lue. The positive aspects of this type of system are: (1) possible future connecti on to a centra I sewer system, (2) I ess homeowner ma i nten- ance worries than other systems. Negative aspects are: (1) Concentration of sewage effluent discharge. Local experience has been that typical smal) treatment plants don't provide effluent quality significantly higher than that of fihe other systems herein discussed. Thus this type of system can present the same ground water rollution problem as the community drainfield sysfiem; (2) high maintenance cost. cont...... Page 3 J u( y 18, 1978 Sextons Addition Prelim. Plat Sewer Feas. Study Maintenance of this type of system has proven to be much higher than the individual on-site system. It is also estimated to be higher than the community drainfield system although actual comparisons are not yet available as the community drainfield is o new concept (at least locally). Genera I Comments Concerni ng These and Other Types of Sewage Treatment Sysfiems. The success of the individual on-site treatment system in the Spokane Valley as measured by its low rate of fai lure and therefore low maintenance cost and long drainfield life makes its economic feasibility unquestionable. Large and sma I I developments a I i ke show the same cost compari sons. The ground water pollution problem is, of course, a serious concern to all people in the Spokane area. None of the systems considered herein guarantees that pollution of ground water won't occur. Ofiher alternative sewage disposal methods such os central systems discharging to surface waters would not be permitted by the Department of Ecology without afi least tertiary treatment. These systems are not economically feasible for projects of this size. Logoons and other types of sealed systems depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Individuol systems of the sealed type haven't yet proved workable in this climate. Larger ones such as lagoons have poor community acceptance and unrealistic land area requirements for smaller subdivisions such as this. Conclusions and Recommendation Economic, governmental, and community cacceptance considerations limit the choice of sewage treatment systems to the three evaluated by this study. Economic analysis of the fihree considered systems favors the individual on- site method. Ground water pollution danger is the other major consider- ation. In our opinion the individual on-site method will provide (ess ground water pol (ution potentia) than wi II the other methods. Thus we recommend that individual on-site sewage disposal systems be allowed for th i s proposa I. Daniel B. Clark ` ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. PE-1232-78 & ZE-142-78 In the matter of a Hearing to consider the application of Valley Carter Company, N 1014 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as SEXTOEd'S ADDITIOy. Also to consider changing the Zoning map f rom Agricultural to SingleTFamily Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only opon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property The nroperty being platted is described as• Lots 7& 8, Block 28, Corbin Addition to Greenacres, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Totivnship 25N, Range 45 E.4J M, Spokane County, Washington. (South of Fourth Avenue and East of Long Road) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) %<-o 0 L cr , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cltizen of the United States of Amerlca, and a resldent of the State of Washington over the aqe of 16 years. That on the t-7 day of((,JC-r0-5.r , 19 I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of he hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBI.IC HEARING !n a consptcuous manner at each of the foliowing locations, to-wtt: < "S 2~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~vyt~ ~ ~ ~ ~rr-~ 3. ~p ee ~ ~ . / C~~ 19 7 Y D A T E D T H I S DAY O F ~ ~ SIGNED . Subscribed and Swarn to before me thls /7 Z4 day of , 19 78 ~ ~ IVotary Publlc in and for the State of W a shi ngton, re s idtng at Spoka ne, Wa sh i ngtc, ~ F I LE ~a•~ ' 7'~ S~x;~vt~ ;.s /~r~ a.~ 2~= - i y~• 7~ , i . STAFF RMEW OF ENVIRQN ENTAL GT-4ECKLIST ~ S?OMANL COUhT♦ C0u4T NOUSC I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Envfronmental Checklist has been subrnitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any 4dditional pQ tinent dats has subsequently been reviewed b th e~~., t.L,~- , I 4, ~.-n Y Enr . The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: Zone Change; -IPceliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; C'riange of Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal: . ~ i3~Ln-z ~ ~ ~ G1 oS 4~,~t - ' y-►, G ~ . a ~ 1 C . Loca tion of Proposal: T--~- ~~L~~a ~ ~S~-,~~ ~ Q ^ bI (Ponm.^.1 .6 Ao-n ~ II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adveArse imnacts are noted unde:- the folla-N:ng questions: (1) Earth Land U s e (15) Energy (2) ~ Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) f Water (10) Risk of (17) Human Upset Health (4) ~ Flora (11) ~ Population (18) Aesthetics (S) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Rec. (6) "Noise (13) Trans./ (20) Arch.! Circ. Hist. (7) ~ Light & (14) ✓ Public (21) Other Glare Services B. Potentially s#gnificant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: ~ , C. Discus sion of imnacts identified above: III. Conclusions) and Recommiandations: Based on this staff review of the environmPntal checklist, the staff: A. ~ Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recom-np-nds/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificanc~e. B. Concludes rhat there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature oi the proposal, recom-nnnds/issues a final declaration of nensignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverGe impacts do exist and recommands/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff inember( s) reviewi ng checkl i st , :,t ~c.) -c I . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ . ~ ? • ,7 PUBLlC WORKS BUtLDINO N. 81/ JEFFERSC>N S'tAEET ~:'f f 9 I' ~ ~ , a. .~~-+~ct , ' ~~':•PHOlVE 456-2274 SPOKANE. WASNING70N QQ25O ~ - - 77 MEMORANDUM ~ 310. to, µE.1~4LT-r~ bi S T"• * OSH S a) DoE T0: AnU: E1V0&IZ0►4NENT^4. 14fA4-r►+ ATr+v: Teh ausrlcc ArrN: RNYs' SrEA.c.~N~ ~ M u0 CW410Nou. oprPlctl m owrta SRR 4~fT• A'tTN s, 'do rs G1 E coat~4.0 t/~1 A , FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 J ef f erson Spokane, WA. 99260 (509) 456-2274 Attention: WpS,Iy Ru tlgA= REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checkl ist, map; all or some of which are attached. ' Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spakane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTIMG AGENCY, i s the LEAD AGEPICY for t-he fol 1 owi ng proj ect: 'PE: - 123 'l - 'U S cy -robLj F1.= This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (.41 ) or an AGENCY WITH FXPERTISE {WAC 197-10-040 (.3 ) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Oeclaration of Nonsignificance was i ssued on qq~ . Pl ease respond, i f appropriate, at yaur earliest opportunity, but na later than the public hearing scheduled for 3L77 t 4 7 8 • The subject propvsal or action (IS, NIM) LOCATED WITHIN THE SP4KAiVE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ANOTHER AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT TO iHE AQUIFER. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). or a Ground Wazer Impact Eval - uation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should 5e prepared. Enc1 osures , pE-~~3z-18 . y' . A ' ~ I3 ~ ~y, i ► tu,.• _ CHECKL IST . . . Introducttan: The State Environmcntal Poifc7 Act of 1471, Chapter 43.21C. RCw. requires all state ann t0Ca1 gcverrnnental agencie5 to tonsider envlror►mental vaiues both for [heir arn actions and when licensing private propo5a15. Tht Act also recuires that an Envirorunental imoact Statemnt be prepareC for all aiafor actians siqnfficantTy (and "acversely'. as per WAC 197-10) affectlnq the quslity of the physical tnvironment. ?he puroose of th1s checklist is Lo hiea the agencies in- voived (ietern+ine rhether or not a provosal is such a arajor actton. Plense ansr+er the following auestions as tompleuly as you can with the inforarwtlart presently ava11a01e to you. Pltase inswer ,iuestions 3s "yes" or "maybe" if, 1n your opinion, even only sligAt impacts ++ilt result. The reviewers of the thetklisL w111 ne avrare of dnd tonCern themselves with the dearee of Smpatt, asking you for more infprmation, if rtece5sary. anere explanations a` your answen are required. or .rhere you be-Tieve an expianation vrould be helpfui to govrrnnent deci5lon-rmkers, include your zNplanatian !n the sRace provided, or use additional paGes, if nectssarv. Yeu should incluQe referentes to any reports or stuaies of whicn you are a,.are and which are retevant to tre answen you Drovide. CamTete answers to these ouestions nav w11i heie all agertcies invoived with your praposal to undertake the requireQ environmQntal review wtthflut unnecessar^ delay. 'he followtng quest/ons apply to your totel proposal, not just to the lfcense fvr ,.hicn you are currently applyfng or :he pro- Posal for Hhich approval is sougnt. Your answars slwuiG include the iapacts which wl11 be caused by yaur prooosal when 4t is convteted, even thougn completlon may not occur urttil sometime 1n the future. This w111 allaw a11 of We agenctes which will be lnvolved to compiett thsfr environmental revie+r now. xithout dupticatinq papenrork 1n tne fuwre. Na epplication shail be processed untii the checklist has Deen cA"ieted and returned to the appropriate Caunty aepartment. State law reouires ex tartatfons f r ever r "yes" and "me vre" answtr~n the cnecklist. The person comqleting the for+n may be requircti *.o provi exp anations or ' no` answers. and in saa+e cases. ~r+ore dt~~ lnfonnation ta aid 1n a Lhreshold determination. yOTE: This is a sUndara form oeing uscd by all statr and loul agencies in Lhe State of Washinqton tor varicus types of prOpOSalS. Many Of :h@ CulSt'Ons srtay nOt 300ly t0 /OUI' prQpOSaI. If d QuEStSOn QOlS not apDly, juSt 3nSbef iC "110" and contlnue on to the next auestion. ENYiROi'IMENTAL CHeCKLiS7 FOP.M . 3ACKGROUHD i, "lame of arooarent: Valley Carter Company Phone Number 924_69~2 2. Aaeress of Proponent:_ N. 1014 Pines Ro~td , 3. Qa[e Checkitst Submittej: U s. agency Requirinq Checklist: ~ n e ~ = Name of Proposai, if ApplicaDie: @ X Ofl S 5. Na[ure and 8rief ~Jescriptton of :ne ~~aosai ~,inc udlna ~uc nat limiud to its sjze, general design eiements. and other factors tnat wili give an accurate ur+dersunding of its scope and natu~): This proposal involves the subdivisign of 9.4 acres into 30 sincle familv latsr A house exi sts on one of the Iats, The lots are tvp~ i ca I lX 11 ~S~QQ sq _ ft _An size. , .acation of Proposal (describe :he phrsical setting of the Proposal. as we11 as tne sxtent of the land area 31f£C:2Q Dy 3ny envir^onmental fmpacts. tncluainq 3ny other infarmatian needee Ln give an accur3te undentanaing of the ersvtron- rwtal settirtg of the proposai): • . This proposed subdivision is locafied on relvtively flat, open land in the Spokane Valley at the Southeast corner of Lona Road ond 4th Avenye* 3. Estimated Oate for CoMiesion or tne Prooasal: 1979 3. List of all Permits. licanses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal. state and :ocal -inc'.ualnq ,.eZO„es)• All CountY ogencies mv,sl aQarove the. lat. TtiP State DeQnrtmE±nt nf Sncinl and Health Servicesr Fire Distr'c 01, and Consolidated Irriaation Dictrict mutt nnnmvg -fne water system. ([F SPACE FOR EXPl.AMATION IS INA4E;tJATE. Pt.EASE 4T7aCH aOflITIONAI AA6E5. ) 10a. i}o you. or tt+e owrtar in the event you do not oMn the subjett land, havt any olans for •utun additlons, wcoansion, ar ' surth8r aCtivity rlldted te or cortnected wftt+ thts proposal? [f yes. expiain: No lOb. Do you own or i►ave oactons an land nearby or adjatent to this proposal's lacation? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know ot any plans by otherS intluding the awner which may affect Lhe OroRertY covered by your proposal or land adjacent ar nearby? If yes, exotain: No 12, attach any athar appifcatiort fora+ that has besn comoTeted reqdrdtnq tt►e proQasal; if none has been cowle*_ea. Out is exotc2ed :a De f11ed at some future dace, rescribe :he nature of sucn aoalfcntfon tarm: A preliminary plat app~icntinn farrn is submitted herewith II. ENYIROIWMENTAL IFtPACTS (ExOlanations of ill "yes" and "rnayDe" answers are required) Yes M3lYQ8 NO 1, farth. Wi11 ttu proPosal result tn: • (a) Unstable earth conditfons or 1n changes in gealogic 3Lruc:ures? _ x (b) 0lsruations, displacesnents, cempaction or overcoverinq of the soi!? X (c) Chenge fn tapography or grouna ;urface relief featur+es? . . . . . . . . . . . X- _ ~;a) The deSLr+xLlon. ;;overtng or modification of any uniqus geologic x or phys i ca 1 fea tures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - lej any increast in -oind ar xater eros'.on af sOtls, eith!r on or off the si*.e? X ( ]rafC ^:R _.(?;_.-:Nr1i . "'1 _'~.A i -cN'.- ~'r"' r1 ~1'.. . - . vl~.l. nl UC... , I!:hanges in Ceposition or erosion of beach sands. or chartaes in siltatfon, Ceposition or erosion wnich may moCify tte channet of a rivar or stream :)r Lhe bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Z<nlanation: (b) Stceet, woter line, sewer and buildin4 construction with aGCOmponu- ing disruptions{ displacements and comoactiqn,, cU Min4r topogranhic chang.es frnm rPgradinr}.~rf streat-s eRd kemesite5. the ]~GPJSdi -esjlt •;n: es Mavoe "to (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) The creatien of abjectlonnDle odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .rj M:eration of aSr mYeffnent, moisLure or *.emperature, or any change in :iimate, ?i:her locally :r rogional'ti•'' . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . ~ ..X. Exaia-iat'on: (a) Road construction tivi 11 cuUse tem,n°rnr~ nir p,ouut'~,;, j ff3*.tr. Wf',1 tht ar00o53i resuit !n: !'=S Mafee ti0 (a) Chanqa in currents, or the course or dirtction of water movements. : {n elther aarfne or fresh waters2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ''o; Changes in absarption rates, 4rainage pattrrs, or the rate and amount of surtace water runotf? . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ (t) Alterations to the coune or flow of flood wtters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . !a) Chanqe in tha emount of surlau r+ater in any water boay? . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (e) discharqe lnto surface weter, or 1n eny alteratlon of surface waur ` awiity, inciuding but not iimlted to teniperature. dissolved oxyr~er~ ar turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (f) Alttrstfen of the d1recCfon or ratr of tla+ of ground Katers? yx_ (g) Changt in tAe quancity of gound waters, elgher through dirett adQittans or withdrawafs, or throuqh fntercaptian of an aqutfer by cuts or excavatiarts? . . . . . . . . . (h) Detertoration in ground water quality, either LhrOU4l1 dirp,_ injectlon. or through the seeoage of lcacnate. phospates detergtnts, r+atarOorne vlrus or bacteria, or other subs'- - into the gound waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reduction in the aneunt of water ott+er+isa avatlaDle for public water suppiies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~ . :.10n: • . OUSE' f • • . ; J;Qnc ca n ~e chaNed by the addi tion qf us~rs to a svstem . ~Iora. Iti 11 the proposal resul t i n: yes %aybe No 3? Chartqe in the diversity of spectts, or nuaiber of any scecies of `]ora (including trees. shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aqwtic plants)' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • X.- , qeduction of Lhe numbers of any unique. rare or endanqsred specles of flora2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - ~ c; :ntroductton of new species of fTora inta an area. or in a barrier to the Rormal rtp]enishnent of exlsLinq sRecfes? X ;d) Reductfon in atreaqe of any aqricuitural crop? w EXalanation: (a ) (d) The chanye from vQri cul fiura I to resi dentia t land "se wi[ 1 r„PnD a reduction in aQricultural crons and an ~ ~n _reatP ~n nmPSt;~„t,~r,a6tQC,-tro~ sR:- shrubs. ~ 5. =auna. Wili the proposal resulC in: res *tavbe ,vo (a) Chanqes in the diversity of speties, ar number of arty speties of fauna ;birds, land animils includlnq reptilts, ftsh ana sheltiish. tienthic organisms, insccts or nH crotauna)? . . . . . . . . . . . X +b1 ~eduction of the nwDers of any unique, rare, or andangtred a soecies of faunat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x :ntroductton of new spltles of launa tnto an area, or resuit ~ in a Darrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X ;1) 0lteriorettOn of exlsting `i5h or wildlife habttat? . . . . . . . . . . . . , X txDianaclon: (aj T'16 chonge I fl land USG W I ll fT1GC] n Q rEdtjctinn i n cmn ll gX„UW~ animals, birds and insects and an increase in house petst NOis$. yPs v.ayLe Yo ~ ,a) uill the prqposal inCrN~e existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . . ,x _ KVl anation: f` !y?(''`-.i-'_ ' ~ ~ . ;.~nt 3na Glare. res `~a De 'i (a) M111 the proposal produce now light or glare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X Lxolanation: Electric street and house Jjghtina wLIl increase the amount of artificial light in the area. Giare from natural light can be increased in resi dentia l developmenfis due to the use of g lass and other ref lective materio I s. 2 ~ , . A (IF SPAt,i fOR fi(FL,aNAT70N IS iNADEQUATc. PLEASr ATTaCH AC JNAI PAGES.) ~ 3. Land Use. ol yts Mavbe No ia) Will the proposal result in the aitera:ion Of the pre5ent or a i anned T and use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ ~ Explanation: Land use will be altered as Qreviously explained. 9. Natura i Respurces. Wi 11 the proposal resut t in: Yes MaraQ "io (a) IncrtasQ fn the rate of use of any natural resources? - • • • • • • • • • • • - x (b) Oeotettan of any nonrene++abie natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . • • • _ x Exptanatian: 10. Ristc of Uoset. Ooes the proposal invoive a resk vf an expia5ion or the Ycs Mavbe Nu release of hazardous suDstartces (lncluding, out not 11m1ted to, oil, pesticldrs, chemicals. ar radiation) in :he event of an accident or x upset candltfens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolana*_ion: 11. Pvpulation. Yes Meybe No wiil the proposal ajter the laatfon. distribution, ser+sity, or growth ' rete of thr human populatian of an area7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ixplanation: Redistribution of ~o ulation is inherant wifih all residentio~ developments. , 12. Housinq. will the proposal atfect existing housing, or creau a demand for addtttanai hausing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ , ilplanation: 29 new houses wi I I be added to the morket , 13. Transportatton/Circulation. W111 ;ne proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional venicuTar moveAent? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Effec:s on exlsting perking faci]itias, or den+ana for new parkfny? . . . . . . . . (t) Iaoact upon existing *_ransportation system? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ;d) Alterattons to present pattarns of cSrculatlon or movemer+t of peopie end/or gooes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (t) Alterat;ons to wateroorne. rail or afr traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X- ;f) Increest in tratfic hazards to motar vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X- Exclanatien: (ci) (c) (d) Relocation and redistribution of population will qenerote additional vehicular movement in this areo f wi II have minor imoact upon tronsportation systems, and wi II alter circulation Qatterns for a limited n e f people. i4. 2-sb11c Services. 'aill Lhe proposal haYe an eftect upon, or result "ts Ma No in a neea for new ar altrred 9overnmentai services in any of ai the foiioatng areas: lai Fire Protectlont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Po1iCe protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ _ - (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Parks or other recreatlonal facilitlesT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Maintenance of public facllities. inciuding roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . X (f) Othef governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • X - - Exptanatlon: A(l QQVernment services will P sli htlv nffPC-tPr4 or nlfPrPrl by thi~ development. It will not require new Qovernment services. ; IF SPACE FOR EXPl,ANATIOlt [S INADEQUATE. PIEASE AT'ACH aD0[7IONi.L PAGES. ) , ~ . .5. EnerQv. .t1 l1 the proposal reSult in: 'fes MayOe No (a) Use ot suostanttal amounts of fuel or enerqy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (b) Demnd uoon ezlstinq saurces of energy. or requiire the develoomnt of new sources ef energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X_ Explanetlon: 16. Uttlities. ai11 the proposal result in a neea for nevr systems. res Msyb! ND I or altarations to C.he followina util9tfes: (a) Pa+er or natwal gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - - (0) Cmwnlcatian systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • x - (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Sawer or sept1C [ankst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Storm water aratnage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - 3 (2F SPACE FOR EXPLANATION :5 IyAOEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACN aC0I7QNAL PAGES.) (f) Solid Kaste and dtsposaTZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ex lanation• M i nor a Iternati ons t o a I I svstems wi I I be necessarv . Yes MaYbe No 17. Huan tiealth. Wi11 the praposal result tn the creation of any heaith hazards or potantfaT heelth hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Explenation: 18. ~Athetics. '~+i11 the proposal result in the obstructien of any scenic vista or v~ew open to the public, or will the proposal resuit in the c-eatien ofi in aestAetically offensiva Site open to puDiiC view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanetion: 19. ~~T' ti0n. H111 the proDosal result in an impaCt upon the Quality or qir~ntlty of existing recreational opporttinities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x Exclanation: 20. Arcteolq tcal/NistoricAl. will the proposal rtsult in an alteration of a Yes ~aYDe No s gn cant arcnTl or hlstorlcel site. structure. abjett or bui'ding? ~ .glanation: . f- U I . S I GNAT'URE I. the undersi9ned. saear under the penalty of perjury that the above resoonses are mads truthfuily and to tt►e be5t of my knowledge. I alsa undersWnO that, sh0u1Q thlre be any willfui misrepresentattOn or xiliful latk Of full disclosure on my pe R.Saok3rte County may withdraw any declaration of nonsionltlcance uw t it mlght lssue in reliancr upon this checklist. Oate: ~ ,~,G' ~ ~ ~ Pr'OODAMt: (Please Pr1nt or Type) P„aponenL: Valley Carter Company adaress: N. 1014 Pines Road Phone: 97d-6297 aerson comoleting torm: Danie B, Clark Phont: 624-7992 oac•: 7/14/`78 Oeoarbaent or Offica of County Rtviewing Checkllst: Staff Mlember(s) Reviewing Checklisz: ~1714 f0 Knc' ~ c- ~ 4 . EAST 419 SPRAGUE AVENUE TELEPHOtdE 624-6915 SPOKANE, WASH 99202 ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS July 18, 1978 , 1J,~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEXTON'S ADDITION Lots 7 and 81 Block 28, Corbin Addition to Greenacres, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington. ~.l B• C . PT E J 4 / Daniel B. Clark, L.S. ~12904 . ~ 12 g4 yI w~ l ~ ~ • . . . - , - ' EXHIBIT A PBELIlKINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM #lsis~~ss~ Ns~t~#isf~i~~s~lr s0l0ft00 y** 0M0* **w**so1~M~fr~~~f~w~#~*li~ssiss~tS+~1~~1f Part I- To be completed by applicant and sur9eyor AREA AND DISTANCE*~~'~'~ssss~.:ssst:...«s.:.rs......s..s.ss:ss..~•+•~~*.*+.+«:.*.ar*s.sss...*~•*•~. Total amount of la.nd ia thi.s Subdiviaion: 9•4 Acrea Total Number of Lots 34 P:-opoeed density of the Plat : 3.19 Lots/Gross Ac.-e Total auaouat oP adjoiafag land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None Ac: es Proposes IIee of controlled adjo' n land: N/,A what ia the driving distance in miles to the neareet fire station? l.5 mu,les Shopping facilities? 3/4 mile Municipal Baundary: m' e Paved street or highway adjacent ? $pokone Indicate the proposed laad zse of the p? at: Single Family D4reLings C x). I?uplexes ( Indicate lots Por duplexes: Mulii-family dwelli.n.g uaits C Indicate witch loz3: Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Descr;be anf son-reside^tial use nroposed --'a the Pla:: N QnQ What is the preseat use of the pronerty propoBed to be platted? Agriculturol List type of uses: Cultivated laad: 9T4 acres. Pasture: acrdso Timber: acres. Vacaat: acre'. Other: is keeping oP animats 3esired? No C x). Yes ~ Type : L~~~1~~iJss~*"~•~~•sassss*.c~sss+~ss•~r~ss,asss,as•wrs~s+~~~~*sw*~rs*s*sasssssss■ss~ss~ss~s.~.ssRsrDo you plan to fi.le the Pl-at ia its entixety as prvnosed, ar wi11 it be a raul.ti-ohase deve- lopmeat'. Enticety , To what level of improvement wi11 streets be constructed? Cravel C Mi.n=mum• Curb and Gravel ( Curb aad Paved C x). Paved only t Describe any combinat,:oaas of above: , +1ha.t is the time period expected far complete developmeat of the Plat: 1 year Street improvemeata completed? 1 Year . Substantial number of lots occupied? i year Is dedication of aay land for public use contemg.l.eted? (Parks, schovls, etc.) No, (x). Yes C Describe: , Iadi-cate the size of units psopoaed to be coastructed: 1000 - 1300 Square feet Number oi bedrooms 2-3 • Estimated Sale :.ce 50,000. Will bui.ldings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( x). Yes ( Will any special. deed restrictions be included +n the sale of lots? No ( Yes ( x)- I A. ityes" , sxplaia: Tvn i c'ty I res i ctdive cavenQnb Ul .I r'.t~tii~le~rl**f~#fatlfisilSi~l~/t~1~~~1~w11~lrtrl~7N~~/1~t~~~ylf»~lf~f~~~~s~~71~*is~ar*i~i~i~;tM* 1 Indicate the nroposed method of sewage dispoaal: Septic tank ( x). Lagoon ~ Treataent plant ( Other, or coabinations (Describe) , Indicate the rroposed sourcc of water supply: Inciividual wells ~ Public s9stafa ( x). pZ'1V3t2 COmrminz ty 9ygtL+►m ~ ~ . Indicate method of extending sez^Jice to ths lots (Dwelliags): . Underground util.ity easementa ( x). Overhead utilit-y easemeat9 ( x). Utilities in streets ( x). No easements t Indicate the distance fram this proposal to the nearest ezd.sti.ug water caain: ndia __nt fe" Indicate size of nearest main: f inches. . r E X H I B I T A pRELIlMIINARY PLAT APP'LICATION FORM (Continued) pa.ge 2 UTILIfiIES - CContiaued)~~#~*I~1i1#~f~~M*s*itR«r**~i*S*w~~~sii~*i~*!i!*~l~~~ti*~iM~~Sf~s~i+til~1~~~M• List util.ity compaaies or districts expected to provide service ta this Plat: ' II.ectricity: WWP • Gas: WWP Water: Consolidated Phoae: PNB .I>rr. District AVpNOAy~rY~L7**~yt##~is**~*MMii~t~~ilit~SfRiiii*~tiM~iis~*~t~~r~*~r~*~~~#~**»~**1~»*~l~~#i~ft*~i g$ppOSED pI,AT NpME: $exton's Addition I, the uadersigned, have compl.eted the info tion requested, aad the PreliM.inary ?'+at nas beea prepared by me under my supervisioa ' ccordance with the requirements of the Spokane Count~,~ Dspartmeat aad the lawe/ e Stat oY ~ B. (si~d) ~ ~ ~ k~ate: 7/14/18 OQ~~PTEOry~ (Address) East 419 Sprague Phone : 624-7992 0 o Spokane, Wa? 992Q2_ Zip : 992 2 2 r"'~` 7s Q S .S I, the uadersigned, swear uader the peaslty of perjury tha.t the aboQe responses are ma.de truthfully and to the best of cay knowledge. I also understand that, shauld there be e.ny tirillful misrepresentation or wi11fu1 lack of full disclosure on m9 part, Spokane Couaty may withdraw any declaration of nonsigaificance taat it mieat issue in reliance upon this check3.'_st. Valley Carter Com ny ~/l~~~17 (Sigaed) Data: % - . (Address) N 1014 Pi nes Road phane; 924-6922 r • • Zip: D8L@ : ~ - `~Y NCTA_~?Y SEAL ; 110 1~~rrsss!*yts*~Rfr*~~M*~*sssssssass~csra~r~wMrrMSR~**~arr*asss~~sss+ssssasssas+assal~~ss~*ilAii~~iw**a• Part i~ - to be completed by watar pur•reyvr A. This sucdiTi.sion (1§1 (is aot) situated within our service area. B. We are (able) (aot able) aad willirg to supply th~s. sut}cii V-~3a-cn with adequatz aater for (domesti.c~Zfire iadustr-ial coatmercial ) uses.% l6fi Q-T-i oiA 5+ew i c e. C. Satisfactory arrange:aent {have) (ha?e aoi) been maae '-o serve this proposal. D. Sigaature (only whea items A, JT & C true and completed) 6~e. z° 1.78 ~ purveyors e signature and titl-e aate . ....#....,.s.~~?~ ~ll,~.*. . ~ ►°!~*,..,.,...~....,*.*,........~.*...s*:.,...*„~......~ Part III - to be completed by Health District A. Sealth District requirsmeats for preliminary pla have have not) beea sa.tisfied. B. Sirs-ignature d title date •wswMi~lr~af~a~f!*rftii~ls~lslt#~#~iAti~ilM+r~w~~*Myt~f~Mrsy!*i~s~~l~1*!l~+r~#i!!l~~iY~~1~+M*~S~f#wt~!■ J ~ r r E X 3 I B I T A PRELIlM~1iARY PLAT APPt~ICATIOTI FOFtM - (Continued) tage 3 Part N- to be completed by Couaty Engiaeers Office A. Couaty ~'agiaeera Office requirements for preliminary nlats have (have rrot) beea satisfied. H. Sigaature sigaature and tit16 date ss~~~s~y~s~~s~~s*~ssssss~ss*s~*ss*+r+~ss~ssa~rs~s~~:r~rsssttsr~s*.ws~sr+~•.*sa~~ws+~»ssarsr.ssss Part V- to be completed by County IItilitiee Dept. A. County ytilities Department reouirements for prel:.minarp pla hav!qii(have.aot) been sati sf ied . /40`°,r , B. Si gnature . j1 si ture and title date •~s~~ss*ssar~rass*sr*yssr*MSas+~r~r~ss~*~s*~*ssya,sss~swa~as,a.sss~sr~sswrr*ss~r*s~s~sss~~+sstr~a This part to, 'ne completed 'oy Pla.n^.ing DeDartment Plsnaiag DemartcIIent in-forr.ation Date Submitted: ~`l- Checked 'vy: School Di st: ict :d,-t-tas JgQL7 Prelimiua9 P1-at Fee Fx' stiag Zoaiag• • A C- Checklist Fee : d Zoae Chan$e Fil e Vo. : t~ - " 73 Date Establi ahed : 7 -,10 ' S 7 Number of Lots: 3 C) Advertised Zone IIpgradiag: / c::~_;;;+'-< s? ? at r ile No. : I~ocatioa: Section ~ Toarnahip Hearing Date : Baage : C'."j ( - zt Plat varae : I I ; ~ ~ I ~ r RE+CElRT ~ ~ 0427 R+eceived From - Ac4eiresm 10 ( Doi lcs rs . Foe ACCOuNT HOw PAID _ SpOKANE COUrTy pLAruM~ Dr-PAR~bUNT AMt CASH ACCflUNT AMt. PAIC7 CHfCI{ )Ea ~ gy ~ ~r~,~~ut ~ ' . ~ l ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT CONF'ERENCE CHEChZIST FOR ~ %A~ P . THE FOLL04ING DOCUhTIIVTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACC~' CE BY T-11E FIaANNIIVG DEPABTNENT FOR fiEARING BY THE PLANNING CONtNiISSION : 1. PLAT APPLICATIOrT 2. LEC'~L DESCRIPTI4N 3. ENGINF~f~.S SECTION MAPS (2) 4, ASSESSORS SECTION MAP (1) 5. PMIMSNARY PLAT MAPS (6)~ 6. E1VS7r.R0ITIiIIVTA'L CFLCKLIS i ' . DEVII~OPT?...EtJ 1 ?'LAI1S s OTHER A ~ . COMMENTS : . . . • y This docucnent must be returaed to the Plat Administrator at the time application is made. 4dmini ator ~ . " - / 7~ Current Planning Ad:nini strator r' ` ~ ~ ; uZ / 'r ' 1 `1 ~zS~4- S 1 PRFLIMIlMARY PLAT CCNFg2IIVCE CHECKLIST FOR ` L.•~ TSE FOLLOWING DOCUMEIVTS SHALL BE SIIBMIT7.ED PRIOR TO ACCEP`.!'ANCE BY THE PLANNING DEPAFTriE1+1T FOR HEARING BY TSE PLA.NNING CONIIMISSION : 1. PLAT AFPLICATION Z. LEC=AL DESCR?PTICN . ENGINEFRS SECTION MAPS (Z) 3 4. ASSFSSORS SECT ION MAP (1) 5. PRELIMITIARY PLAT MAPS (6) 6. IIvV?RoNMENTAL CHECKLTST ~ 7. DEVELOPMErTT FLANS d,u~ ~ y 8 . OTHER q. COMMENTS: ~ This document must be returned to the Plat Admin.istrator at the time application is made. i Plat Administ ator , Current Plaiuiing Admini stratior _ , ~ i ~ ~J ~ Date: _ v 1. Applicants Name : Address: Phone: 2. Surveyor: ZT-+ 3. Number of Lots: 4. Use : 5. Acres: V ~ 6. Legal Descrlptaon / Location: ~ 7. Notes: a ~ r--~--- - - . - - ~ ~ . - -~F ~ . . ~ ~ ..a~. ~ ~r . - SPOKANE CO4JNTY PE..ANrvrNG DEPARTMEtvT ~4F n ~ ~ N 721 JEFFEFtSON SP'OI[ANE, WASHIWGTON 992-6C7 GCT 1 f'75 i~f l+ ~i N ~ ~ o c ! v 0 ~ r ~ M Engermann E 1808 Ma7 n ~4*~0/1 f4le 5pokane, irdA. 992D2 (y CR-~ ~r~• - ~ Ye~ F J ~ 4~ ~I E. 'BEH I rO ~e~~~D E f; _ c.~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~GEhIDA, ~]~t~o~~r Z7 3 191~ T~~~PHQI~E N0. 456-~Z05 SPO~~A~IE C~U9~~Y ~LA~1I~I~1~ HEARIN~ E~4~MINE~ - Ti~n~: ~riday, #}c~+~ber ~l, 1~7~ - 1:34 P.~I. (It+~m 3 c~n aft~rnaon agen~ia} r Pla~e: Brvadway Ce~tre ~uild~ng 2n~ ~l~or hl 1~1 Jeffer~on, Spnkan~ ~ PRELIMIP~ARY ~UB~IVISI~N AN[} Z~NE 4~ECLASSIFI~AIT(11~ ~ ~ ~ ~4ge~d~a P~-123~-7$, S~~T~~1 S~ ADD ITIOhI Item ZE-14~-~5, J4GRIC~IL'fURAL TO ~IN~~E-F~~ILY RESIDENTIAL ' a. l.ocati~n~ 5ect~on ~9, ~`awr~s~ip ~5, R~n~qe 45 E.W.M. _ ~at~ 7& 8, ~la~k 28, Carbir~ Addition tn ~r~en~cres, l~~~t~d in the I~E 1,14 ~f ~e~~19 b. S~ons~r: B~ddi~ L. Co~k ~ ~al ~e,y Cart~r Ct~. N l~l~ P~ne~ R~a~d _ Spo~tane ~ 4~A~ 9~92Q~6 Surveyor: D~niel 8. Clark E 419 Spr~gu~ f Sp~c~kane, 4~~. d. S~t~ Size. 9.4 ~cres ° Numb~er Qf L~ats; ~0 1Qts _ f. ~Prop~s~d La~d U~e. Single-~a~ily ~w~llings g. Existin~ ~oning~ ~gri~ultura~ ~estahlishe~ 1J~0/57~ - h. Prop~~ed Zor~~ng: Sing~e-Fa~ily R~s~denti~l i. Wa~.+er S~~~rce. ~~ansali~ated Irr~igativn Di~trict #19 j. 5ch~ol [~~stri~t. C~entral l~~ll~y District #~56 k. 1~~thad vf Se~ra~e ai~pc~~~l: Ind~viduai S~epti~ Tank~ 1, Er~v~ronmental Impact; A to~i~ o'F di~cussivn this h~arir~g m~y be +wh~ther c~r ~~t th~s ~r~apvs~l wi l1 have a_ significant adv~rse ena~rc~~mental im~ac~. ~ ~ a~ ; , r T` aFFI ~ ~ r., . ~ ~ ~ - N! I N ~ ~ N ~ . „r . , ~ _ ~p ! l~r, c `~f 4 } ~ - ~ ~L.i~~ . # I 1A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I op ~ ~h~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~Y~ ! ~A. ~i l'~ CC ~ y, • ~ 1f ~ !11+ ~~i r ~ e ~ ~t E a~ y ~ Y t ~ ~ P~~~ ~ ~ - ~ rx~ ~rr~ v ~ 71 17~ M~'~ .IT4 I~l~ iT5177' I7 ~ I I~'L I~ 1~4 ~I~S 1~ ~ rc ~ ~ . ~awM s~a ru+a. _S 6 Q~ - r ' Forward data to the computer room tor processi ng. L 1~'oe Iturn these sheets to the Flan -i Department ~ l~ , -p, ''di upon com letion of Keypunching, attention of• ; , ~ at Sectio ~r• (79 i' -2Lia I pC-_IZ.3Z•~8 69 ~ Codirz examole* > > , _,0 9 1 6 se r a o eLxiwT S 6 T PL~9 10 13 ( Parce 1 r:ttmber 32 541-0S0l only - D 42 37 _L2L514I i - o, o ParcEi rnimbers 32541-0800 thru 32541-0809 G 9 1 f y~ - 0, b, I 3g' -C8.,T ParceZ number9 32541-0800 thru 32541-08W Mg 1/4 ot aec. 32, twp• 25, rgs. 44 I A1T of aec. 32, txp. 25, rge. 44 j .1: Alp of txp. 25, r8e. 44. Al I of rge. 44. Sectfoaa vith.in ~ 2ovnehin nge _ 6 9 ~ - o~l 06105 04 03102101 07 I 08 ~ 09 I IO ~I3 12 1811?I1b115~].41131 1 12012I!22 2 I2.41 ~ 0 29128127 6 251 31T3211 33 34 ( 35 36 ,~69 -03,2 I 6 9 z i •o,3,z,3 Quarter aections , 6 9 r 3 Z~ ` within afction 1 0 3 ^G 9 1 ' •40 t o' 3 ~ 4 t , -40t 3, ~ ~ .,,,y ► ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ , . , _ T` ~4~I I J~~ ~~~~~R ~~0~~~ L~ G~` D~ 5 C R~~~~~ N ~ i 5~ OG~~~~~ llf I97~ _ . . ~ KAN NfiY ~ A~. A~ND ~I~ S~ ~ C~ U ~ ~ E P A~ i~0 ' P~ lN~' C~~ i~ ~ r' ~ M~~R NI~M~ER AS~~~S~~ ~WN~R !.'~GAL DE~CRIR~T~}N [~F ~R[7P~'~fY ~`A~PAd~ER ll ~ P R R i~D ~R A~ S~~(~~N ~'~TE ~ 19~~1 Ubtl 7~9195~ JOSE ~ P t~1R Y C~ BTN Q G~J S E 18~1~~ 4~'H AVE Li ~ ~ G~~~MA~R~S I~A 994~16 55 - R A ~ ~ { ~9 1 D61~ 7t~41'95~ JQSEP~i P HURR CQ ~I'N I3D GRNA~R5 S~ ~ON ` E 18~~~' ~~H ~VE L~ 8~~ ~ _ . , GRE~NAG~~S ~A '~9~~6 ~ Pt1P:A~l~ C~ilNTY PI.ANNRNG C~M'MISS1~ 19~5~-~~1~ i~b1~1~ ~ h~ P~[NGL COR~I~N AA~ GR~IA~R~ ~ttQP~RTY ~wN~~S ~10~'~FI~D P~iN~G~f ~~,~YD W~r- E ~8 ~~74 4'IH A~iE ~OF ~ ~.b 928 . . la~ ~y~- ~ , ; i~~TE. = GRIEENACRES i~A 99~1b 9 F , L-` ~i w 19~5t-i?b04 ~4Z~'Q3C l~ H MC CARTNEY ~~RBIM A~D ~~~IACRS T S►AY ~K ~~f ~i~q '~R,~ f.k~q k''~'~t:l w l ~~~7~1 lG f3~~ ~~G~~~~ ^ ~ ~ dr E ' _ 1T R R [~#iBt A~~ GRNA t~ fAY1.+~~ Hui~~~T i9~'S~ ~7~~~ 7~ ~96 H~I~~ T W A~fl ~ N G S _ ~rHA ~i~D~f~ B~S ~ 18~U8 T V~ ~ ~ ~PUKAME ~fA 99(~~b ~ ~ ~ 1g5~~-~!~0~' i'T~~15~66~ ~k~~~~ E~CHE~ftE~ ~OR~~~ Ad~ GRMA~KS ~ E SF~. ; ~ 1,~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~134~T L5 Z4~0 97 ~ t R A ~E ' K 9 a T H R ~ DQ ~R iWA R ~F I~ ~A'~ ~ Q~ 1 1. ~34 TB~~! '~~ri3 1 E S~ ~p~~E C I~ ~~5 1~~2 v E~tL S155Fi Q~ E1~pFT ~~~(C G~ ~t~ ~11~~ U5,~56 T r ~ 195~i-L~~~`b ~r~2bT~C W~! H HANE1~ ~O~~IN AD~ TO ~~~~NA~CR~S FICK ~FL~Yp _ ~ ~ +~b , ,~►~s~ , p4 E ~9~FT QF ~ 11, BZ~ ~~F~' N 1~D 1 ~AR~(~R ~ _ ~R~~l~SCRE~ ~IA ~9~16 ~ 9 8 p~ ~ K LIF~~R L 5~L 6~'~ b~(~284~ ~~lf~~Rf~ ~IC1C C~iR IN A ~~'~NAC~~~ ll~ FIG ~ ~3 A ~~s ~~c ~ ~x~ ~~~fi ~ ~,~~z~ sr~ v~ ~,~~~~ra~~~s w~ ~ 19551;062~ ~6~~~44247 ~ITLB~~tT ~}~~E ~~R~~N A~D ~RI~ACRE~ ~.i~ Wlld~~~ ~ E CJ~ Tki AV~ 8~$ E~(L '~~~~~fi ~ ~XC ~~F~ 19 5 ~ ~ GR~~NA~R~S i~A 9~9~1~ ~95'~1-~lf~~~ i~4~~~C Mt~L~~Rfi ~QR~ ~~R~tN AQQ ~R~IAG~ES ~Q~~ ~iII~ERt M A ~I192~T 0~ ~.10 B"8 El4C ~~FT ~~~~QS 8T 11 ~ ~R~~NALR~~ ~A 94~16 ~ ~ a ~ ~~1~5~ ~b13 ~36i543 R Ld~NKFQRD ~C~~tBIIV A~~ ~R~VA~R LANKF~I ~ ~ 4~8 ~1~ ~A V~ 5T L~ ~~8 I~ 1 ~ ~ ~A '~9 04 ~ ~~A~i~ ~ ~ 1 5~ - ~J t~ ~ hf~t ~ G EE A . , V ~IN~ API NG 9 1~41 7~ ,~1~~~~'4 ASH A C~IN DD ~~1 GRES A~LE~f SG ~ ~ S~ K f~5i] af 5~1~ D~ S B~K ~b ~ SGHULi'I ~ IV ~ ~i ~ ~,~~~~~►c€~~s ~~~~r~n~~~s ~~c~~~, 1~ l- 4 4 ~I A R~~NA~~E ~ S H~' TI H~RMAN K 9 ~ 1 ~~'~1~~ M~R~I,~~V ~GHI~~.T ~ ~I ~U ~ S G ~ E6~' ~1465 ~~f S~~~' ~F 11' ~ 8~K 26 ~~,~9~ 8 20iH A11~ I ~ 9 ~~Pai~ArlE ~lA 92vb ~ ~~~~1-~~►2~ ~~~~Z~o~~~ s~ 5~w~iTZ ~o~e~~ Aa[~ T~ ~~EE~~C~~~ 1rA~i~~~r ~~,~~~~~f~+~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ v ~t _ ~L~S ~~8 ~~K 2b E~C~ ~1'~a Sl~. T ~ EJ(C ~+6~~I O~F ~14+~~~~ ~ ~G~U~ L 5 ~ ~N 'T Ex~G AT a L~1 (~F 41`~ AV~ ~i~ ~id~~h~AGRES Rp - _ ~~_~~~~~r c~~ _ ~F ~r a ~ r►~ ~ _ - ~ - - - ~~~~~r r:~ ra~.~~ r~~~ ~r~~.~~~~ T~ ~z~~~ ~z~.~~~t ~~~~r,r~~~~~ w~ r~r ~r 1~,. ~ r~ rr,~~. ~ r~ s~~~ i ~re► s ~ ~cc ~a~ c a~ i~ ~ ~ ~ Lrr a~ ~~H ~v~ ~~~t r~~~ TN N'9~FT TM w12~FT TN 57~.11~T S4~+DEG S~MIN ~BSU'~ ~~6.~iDF~ _ ~H ~ 1~pQ. ~ 1F ~ T~ Pt~~ ~y 1~~5i-(~4~`Z 79Q+~ 9a449 ~ L 5~H~~I~D~R COR~~N ~A~D ~0 ~REENAGRES 5~:i~~l~lV~ER E GENE L 1 U , RT~V 0~ L~ ~ 8L~( ~b 9~G dT S~1 ~~R ~F LT B~ N L~l 0~ 4~H AVE E 6,~0~ ~ITH A►VE ~N E~O~r, 5~31~T TM N'~Fr t[~ ~f~UE P~9 tH 1~9~FT TH ~112~F ~~H S~'S. ~1~ T SP~~(+~~1~ ~fA 9~~~06 ~H s~~ra~~ ~~~t+~ ~~sQS ~~e.~c~~~ ~i~o~~~~r ao ~955I-~4~1 TB~t?19Q~►49 E L S~GHLEN~E[~ CG~~i~l AQ~ '~0 GREE~IAL~E~ ~CHl.~ND~ER E~G~~i~ ~L ~`T ~IF 8 BL~C ~6 B~G AT 5~ CD~k 1.~' 8~~l ~LN ~i~ 4TW AV~ ~ 6~OS 17T~H AV~ ~ 1'H NSFT i(~ ~RUE Pt~~ `(M Eli~►~,39~T ~N N45'~~~, O~M~~I ~C~S1D5 E~8.3~~~ 5~~3~14~1~ IwA 99~d?6 ~'H ~VT4.89FT TH i~1~4~49F~ IM S95f~ T~ PQt~ . ~95~1-~~r~C! t~0~74~11 ~~N C~ D~~S ~~1R~Il~ A~~ GRI~ACR~ L~-~ CENTR►~L VL~' ~CW D~5~3~b ~2b S 1~3 ~6~I~D~SH RD 5~~K14~~ ~A '~9~Q~ ~ ~ A ~ 55~2~~)~1~ ~+5S~~3C ~1 ~1 ~ISCH~ C~~~~N DD ~~NAC~tS 5I1~ ~I~~G L9 B,ZS {l0~ 19~~~2-~3~2~ ~~19~r3~C C~A ~ARCKL+4Y +CURPItI~ ADO GRhIAC~S ~~SCH~R l~ILMAF~ W Ni6~ClfT QF E38~~~ ~F ~Ll~ 8~5 S Z1~Q ~ - ~f~~NA~aES MA 9'~~~lr 1 ~ 19'~~2-~3 4 T{#0~09~0(~4 D HA~t~H9ARG C~R~[ AflD GRNACR ' . ~NAR H AR R a~~ ~ ~ w s ~ ~ ~ s ~ stc~o~a a~ rrzoo~r ~~sv~r ~t~ ~z5 ~ ~or~~ ~~~~~a~~~s rr,a ~~o~+~ l9~'S2-~~~L 7bOd145875 ~EE R RI~LLY CQRB~I~ A~D ~RNACRS ~~IL~LY ~EE R ~38~F~ L3F L1~ 82~ EXC ~e,'+DLtFt S~~~ LOhiG ~T N ~PO~A ~ M~A 99~~ib 19552-~3Z3 429bX~A ~ R~~dVK~ CORBIN q~D ~R~~~IAGf~~~ Tl~V~~~ C R IV1J~ C~F L11 5 404 L~7N~ ST - ~iR~~NAGR~E~ ~fA ~9~14 1~~~~-~~~~ ~'~~~~~434~ A~Q~E~T S~SI~IG CQ~~IN ~~~7 ~~~ENA~a~~ K~~IG ~tC~~~~~ S S1/Z ~F L 11 B2~ S#~16 L~1NG ~~~~NAC~~S 'kA 99UIb - 1~5~~~-034~] ~T~+~~5fl9A~1 E~ILI~ Z~~t!4~~4 C'~RBTN A~~ T~] ~~E~~IAG~ES ~.AM1~RA ~Mll~i~ ~ ~.T 1~ 9Li~ ~5 EXC S5' ~~l(C 518bi a~ E~~~' ~14 N 5'iH ST G~~N+~X I~A 9~t~04 M N~4 ~Rr ~ 1 _ ~~o~~~~~~~ ~ ~a ~ ~a~ tr~ ro ~c~t~~ ~~ut~ ~ , ` n`C r f r a,~,,~ ~ S~'~6 ~F E~35 ~f l~ 1~ ~L~ ~5 5~ S 51~ Li~N~ RQ ~ I 4'~ ~R~~NALR~S I~A ~1'~+~~6 ~9~5~-~tl~~ 58~~'44~ ARNO~,~ 14 ME~'~ Z3 4~~ E~l~ 5~1~'4 QF M~~`ER Ait1~LD A 5~,11~► ~F N~i114 ~ 1T~~8 bT~ AY~ ~;R~ENACRES I~A ~~0~+~ 19~52a9~~2 ~~~847C V~ WtS~ 19 2~ 45 E~l~ a~ ~1~/~ ~F t~~,~D ~~G~~~ i~E~"E~S~N S~l~ J . SE1#~ SE114 Qf NY~1/4 ~XG 4ilb il~' ~ 17~1~4 Gfi~i AYE ~,RE~NAGR~~ ~IA 9~Olb 1~355~-'~~3~~ f~Z~B~TC 'V k~~~~ 1~-~5-4~ ~~.I~ t~~ W~/~ ~~TE~50N S~lE J F N~I F A ~~1~4 ~lF SElf4 0 1/4 ~X~ ~~6 11~' T~A~f EX~NP3F~~V ~Pf~RPOS~S ~ 1TT14 GTN V O~ILY ~R~~~AC~i~~ WA 9901~ ~ ° Y 14~5~2-4~~~~ 6~~~~►~~ f~ISF 1~-~5--~' ;1/~ aF Ylll2 UF P~EZ~ER~~~ ~lJ~ ~ ~~114 ~ 5~1,~4 ~F ~w~l~ ~~tC WIb 1/`~~~ ~ 17'714 ~~'H AV~ a- GREENAGR~S ~IA 9901+b L" - ~ . . . _ . . - - - - - _ `=A F - : - - - ug . mn.,_ _ _...~:~___--rt #~a, a.. a . . . . . . _.uam. ~ a . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - F . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _