The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1333-79 & ZE-210-79 ~ L AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE~:, 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAh1INER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on P9orning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane P2ELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1333-79, MA;WELL ADDITIOv ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Towmship 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volume S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of t{ie NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway No. 2 and except the r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKinley 1014 N Pines Road Spokane, !nlA. 99206 d. Engineer: _Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations autEiorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -1- ~ , ( A DIMIN - . ' o ~X W ~ 0 W ~ Q/ W Y > ~ . ' AUGUSTA 187 188 ~9 190 I° I 2~5 , 2~ 5(76 +77 ►7B 179 180 19' 182 183 184 185 186 m 152 .37• 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 1 203 204 ~ 207 - ~ a . ► ~ MAxwELL aN kGreenOC`es Sc:.►oo1 ~.N.R R~ ' I+~mt~tary) . g w (L~ i a ~ LL ~ u ' Q I ~ i \ V f ? s Z , i W R ^ - pONE 8 ONE ~ _ , DOONE E SMET ~ S►~1E1 ~ . ~ AVE L , R ti~:• 1~ ~ [IF 'E NIGHWaY N° 90 v A ~8 yt,el 1 ~L)`~EF . ~ - r - au ~ , ~ D 1 c N'C ~ 1S r~J . . 'c • ~ #NLK I M E iD F r ~•in f~ - ,~P~ • t L.~OSS ~~V ~ WAY $T OFFI ~ A AvE ~ . fJ N O ~ o M A I Id pP ° IVER I SPRAGuE , 100o ~ s i sr ~ • Z ~ r . sECoNo a\. E 2 rdA- N x ~P ~ Q' t 1 A40r4..~,,, • i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ rqURTH V~, F OURTh ~►vE a; . ~ i ;OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINE~R . SrOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Iwfer-offica Commwnitotia~ To pL►NNING LEPARTI~NT . fmo GARY KENHALY,1 PLINN ING & TRAFF IC DIY I3ION FNG INEER MO)L "*#_WAD CONA..~IONS k'p J;S14~ *DONDIT IOHS C IRC APPLY TO PI1T UNLER COHS IDEAIT ION • - - - UALf~ RQ STAN - - PRIVATE RrOAD 3T~1D~IRD3 - - - ~that ooo~ditio aal aPProval of-the Pat ie given aubj•ot to dedication ot Right ot Wa y *W approval ot t4w road systeo in the plat by the Couoty Lagiaear= jthat plaAs, protilea, aad aross esctione •howing proposed •treet aooterliw aad ourb grade• be ■ubaitted to the Couaty Ftgineer for approval prior to conetruotion and the lilitcg ot a tinal platj }-that drainage plans aud design aalculationa ahoWing the grade• and aligaa*nt of draiaaV taoilities be •uba►itt,ed to the County Bngiaeer !or approval pri,or to aoastruatioo sad t!r tili,ag of a tiaal plat; ~ "oastruatioa tiithia the proposed publlc etreeto aAd easoaea"te aha]rl be perlormed uader the diroct •ypervisioa of a liceaNd land aurveyor, who •ball be responsibl• !or perpetuatiag all eridonoe ot the looatiou of •urvey moaument• whicn may be dist.urbed dusing ooAatruotioa aad who ahall turnisb t►he County Eagiaeer with !Ae 8uilt" plana and t oertifioat.e io vritiag that •11 inoprovemAnt• wre irutalled to the lins• and grade• showa on the appsovnd ooaatrwotioo plana tad that •11 diotwrbod moauoatata have beea reRloood j ~rw coastruotioo work ia Lo bo performad within Lbo Publio Right ot way uotil a porait laa boon issued by the Couaty inginser. All work i• eubjeat to iuspeotioa aod approval by the County Fogiaeerf ~all conatTUatioo within the Pub11c Rigbt o! Way is Lo be aompletsd prior to liling the tirul plat or s bond iu the aawunt •etimat,ed by ttys Couaty Ep,giaeer Lo oover the oost of oonatruotio of improoeneats, aonatruati,oa csrtitication, "Ae Huilt" plaria, aad wonuwatiag the •trost aeAterlire• •ball be tiled with the County Enginser;. - K. . _ . . . . . , . nn r.r..M' . . ~-that ~llAroads vithia the plat be curbed nnd/M paved to the epeaificatioos of the Couoty Engiaser. EacietiAg County roade providing direot acose• to lot• ot the plat ehall be pavod and/Aw curbed to the ataadards of the Couaty Engineer. . Z-Proposed privat• road (a)-aerving lote vitb: ao extoneion poseiblej ext.eYUioo to •ervr 8 or leee lote; future public Right of way Lract. )-that private road(e) bs im,proved to •tandard adopted by tlis Board of Couaty Coaaissioners. 0-tLO dlrect acoees troQ lot• to JE?ro AQ~tvAr "adication of FEE7 additional Rigbt of Way alo ' 61vEoy_Jr C ~.that the owner, hie granteeis and aeeigne agree to psrticipnte ia and not oppose or protest acs RID AW _v!j 19id"S , ~ .~-c 12> Dr-- dc ; c. aTt o K e4 addl;-t-t o.vq Ri9 hr•-f w a - Q/o -vq Sto.qc~w•o AvE►L~E AS ~e icT~ ~ oN 7xe Pre/iM;Y~9~~~ /a~` e~ REGa'.2d yT1lc ~ A mo u rtfi ar~ d d t v+~ e K s ~ o~v s e~. -~-h ; S Q t o-~ ~ 1 q~ 4 WAY w 1 be b~ Z'G.~ Co ttriZ' , eN sPc ►Jso 2 1 q ; Nee r i N c a•v c~ c4.r w: I AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNiNG SUBDIVISiON HEARiNG EXAMiNER C0MMiTTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZOtdE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1333-79, MA;;WELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-Z a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to- Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volurne S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of tfie NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTIlUG THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway , No. 2 and except the r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey 1014 N Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer:__ Senske & Associates, Inc. ' E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use : Si ngl-e fami 1y dvrel 1 i ngs and dupl exes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural . i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 ' j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. flethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal'. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -1- • G~ o - ~ . ~ ~ D1~IN 0 ~x W ~ ► O W - u W ~ . > i4 _ 5'R(+ 177 178 179 160 18' 182 183 184 I85~S86 ID 187 188 ~9 190 I° i ~ ~5 , 2Go 191 .97. 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 1 203 204 207 ~ URNMM ~ MAXVYELL AV ~~reenoc►-es S~'iool N.R R. LL Q.. (LIeme tary) B~ U PV o N ONE ~ - ~ MEl BOONE ~ E SMET AVE aa"r"P A E NIGHWaY N- 90 __....e 1333 79 v ~ "U D RQAQ Y V~ ~ EE S P~ ~ `L) ~ 3 . r r - J~ rl ~ S Nt~ON~~ aV ~CNiC~~v I ALKI M E iD ~ r ~c ~ . ~ PN~ ) L.?OS.S , ~ , wAy ~ ST OFFI 1 t , .T:i.r~• ; , , ~ . ~ ) JG• 4 AvE ~ (J ~OH h, OI y~ MA 111 Q ~ oor r,~ ~ _ v, +"~i , ~ SPRAGuE ' O/ ~ ,ST 1p:1Q0 . ~ . (K _ SE:7OND A~ f P 24A ~ ~ • N OURTH VFm F ouRTN AvE c ' ~ I'~ • i STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 PE-1333-79, MAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICITLTURAL TO SINGI.E (R-1) AND TWO (R-2) FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location North and adjacent to Alki; south of Interstate 90; and approximately 400 feet west of Barker Road. B. Proposal - 3 acres subdivided into b lots for single and two family use - Lot frontage = 85 feet to 220 feet - Lot size = 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates resideatial usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses At the present, the site is a vacant and undeveloped piece of agricultural 1and. The areas to the south and southwest do support a blend of various living units, such as mobile homes and duplexes. The land to the west of the proposal, exhibits cultivated alfalfa and pasture fields, accompanied by several single family dwellings. To the south, you will find more cultivated fields, along with a greater concentration of single family dwellings. Further south, are lands utilized for commercial and industrial purposes. To the east of the project, the land use resembles the same as to the south. You have designated pasture lands and cultivated fields, with single family dwellings throughout the area, and commercial property to the southeast. ► And finally, north of the proposal, are scattered single family residences, and of course, the freeway. 2. Compatibility with ExistinR Land Uses The sponsor has requested the development of six lots ranging from 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. in size. He has also proposed single and two family residential use. The proposed uses and lot sizes would appear to be compatible with all the tax segregated parcels in the area, which do range from 13,000 sq. ft. to almost 2 acres in size. -1B- STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MfAXWELL ADDITION - continued" ' II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation (Not received at time of printing) (See Engineer's Memo) B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis- ' posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot withia the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examinatioa of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussioa a. The plat sponsor has proposed 6 lots on 3 acres with a typical lot size of 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal sqstem. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternativ_es for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents • (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the aatural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The.analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020'when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. - 1C - ` STAFT ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MfAXWELL ADDITION - continued C. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.07 to 1.8 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.16 to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagooas, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operatioaal cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. C. Drainage The County Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health • District prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Comunittee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plans. F. Schools Proposal lies within the-boundaries of Central Valley #356. -1D- STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELL ADDITION - continued. , ~ G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that a 7 acre neighborhood park and a 10 acre elementary school just west of Flora will best serve the needs of the residents in the area. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources None have been indentified. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The proposal is presently zoned Agricultural. The property to the north and west are also zoned Agricultural. To the south, is Agricultural, Commercial, and Industrial properties, whereas, to the east, the area is zoned Agricultural and Commercial. The sponsor is requesting duplex uses on Lots 5 and 6 of the plat. There is no duplex zoning in the immediate area although there are duplexes on scattered segregations. If the plat is approved, R-1 and R-2 zoning should be provided as outlined in the recommended conditions. IV. EN`IIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged'to exist. Slight adverse environmeatal impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The Plan.ning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - lE - ' STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELL ADDITION - continued 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Plan.ning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said wateX plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effPCt that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to October 2, 1980. 9. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an envi-ronmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. The drainage plans and design calculatioas showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. - 1F - STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 M;AXWELL ADDITION - continued' 13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the locatioa of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. " 15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 16. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. 18. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions 19. That the provisioas of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. , 20. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified on Lots 5 and 6 to Two Family Residential, and Single Family Residential on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. 21. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time 'to review any preliminary plat approval. Al1 extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 22. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 23. That a public water system serviced by Consolidated Irrigation District #19, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 24. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 25. That the plat dedication contain the statement: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. - 1G - ' STAFt ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELI, ADDITION - continued 26. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the Caunty Engineer. 27. That the sponsor shall certify prior to final plat that no private or public water sources are located on or within 150 feet of the plat boundary. 28. That all wastewater systems intended to be used by any existing structures shal.l be clearly identified and lacated prior to final plat. 29. That due to the limited drainfield areas on the triangular lots, it will be necessary for no portion of a structure to be closer than 26 feet to the east boundarq of Lot 4, and 30 feet to the west boundary of Lot 6. 30. That an on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of the Final Plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management assaciation until said association is dissolved." - 1H - AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISIOP! HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: . Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1333-79, MAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to- Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volume S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the W line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway , No. 2 and except'the r/w d'eeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey . 1014 tJ Pi nes Road Spokane, !rJA . 99206 , d. Engineer:___ _ Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. Pdumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dvrellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural , i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 . j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate inforriation to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal'. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." , -1- 21j C ( A OViIN ~ p Ix W ~ • ~ K 0J W ' > AUGL11STA 187 ' ~5 5 R~ ►r7 ,78 179 I80 18' 182 183 184 185 186 188 lE9 190 I°l 2Cw m 192 , 3; 194 195 196 197 19e 199 200 201 202 I 2p3 ppa ,i 207 ~ WaAnPLL ~ MAxwELL a4 iCGreenxres 5C►~00~ 0= NR R. C4 ~ B. LL a. , (Eleatt ~ta ry ) $ $j ~ Q z T.Wm v E ' . ~ ~ W R AVE. - 8 00 N E . . ~ ONE C) ~ N . - , \ b00NE MEY E SMET ~ AVE ~aRo NE NIG~f~KaY N° 90 o DA ni~L ' i8 q•~c~ i ~ U~E( r vr a" _ c NIGA~ jN ! i • ~ A4.K1 ME N E ~IA ~ „ ' P~~P,• ~ C.pOSS f.'v WAy ~ S1 QrFI ` I► V E ~ ~oN ~ 0 Q • ~ c - , M. I« ~ P ool~ '~•,r _ ~~r ~ ~ ~ SPRAGUE , I o ~ o ~ - - ,=T a ~ :1aoo : 2 ~ ~ SE~OND A~ f !C ~ ~ . ~ ' . J` QURTH V~ ~ F OuRTh AVE I., t • STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 PE-1333-79, MAXWEI.L ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGI.E (R-I) AND TWO (R-2) FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location North and adjacent to Alki; south of Interstate 90; and approximately 400 feet west of Barker Road. B. Proposal - 3 acres subdivided into 6 lots for single and two family use - Lot frontage = 85 feet to 220 feet - - Lot size = 12,004 to 15,000 sq. ft. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses At the present, the site is a vacant and undeveloped piece of agricultural land. The areas to the south and southwest do support a blend of various living units, such as mobile homes and duplexes. The land to the west of the proposal, exhibits cultivated alfalfa and pasture fields, accompanied by several single family dwellings. To the south, you will find more cultivated fields, aloag with a greater concentration of single family dweilings. Further south, are lands utilized for commercial and industrial purposes. To the east of the project, the land use resembles the same as to the south. You have designated pasture lands and cultivated fields, with single family dwellings throughout the area, and commercial property to the southeast. i And finally, north of the proposal, are scattered single family residences, and of course, the freeway. 2. CompatibilitV with ExistinR Land Uses The sponsor has requested the development of six lots ranging f rom 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. in size. He has also proposed single and two family residential use. The proposed uses and lot sizes would appear to be compatible with all the tax segregated parcels in the area, which do range from 13,000 sq. ft. to almost 2 acres in size. -1B- STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWEL.L ADDITION - continued II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation (Not received at time of printing) (See Engineer's Memo) B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis- posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasoas, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be • utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 6 lots on 3 acres with a typical lot size of 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the questioa of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternativ_es for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Arnay Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The.analytical results of the forecast impact of pear 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids conceatration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. - 1C - ` STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELL ADDITION - continued c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.07 to 1.8 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.16 to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to IO ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to. obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecoiogy. These systems are not currently economically available for this pro j ect . 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those.for septic tanks and drainfields. C. Draina &e The County Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. ' The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require tnains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plans. F. Schools Proposal lies within the•boundaries of Central Valley #356. -1D- STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELL ADDITION - continued ~ G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that a 7 acre neighborhood park and a 10 acre elementary school just west of Flora will best serve the needs of the residents in the area. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources None have been indentified. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The proposal is presently zoned Agricultural. The property to the north and west are also zoned Agricultural. To the south, is Agricultural, Commercial, and Industrial properties, whereas, to the east, the area is zoned Agricultural and Commercial. The sponsor is requesting duplex uses on Lots 5 and 6 of the plat. There is no duplex zoning in the immediate area although there are duplexes on scattered segregations. If the plat is approved, R-1 and R-2 zoning should be provided as outlined in the recommended coaditions. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged•to exist. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportatian/circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The Plan.ning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or buiZding sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - lE - ~ 'STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MiAXWELL ADDITION - continued 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authvrities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparencq suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will coatain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to October 1, 1980. 9. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final p1at. - 1F - STAF'F ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MAXWELL ADDITION - continued 13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval bp the County Engineer. 15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to ' filing the final plat or a bond in the a.mount estimated by the County Engiaeer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 16. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. 18. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions 19. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-I392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 20. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified on Lots S and 6 to Two Family Residential, and Single Family Residential on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. 21. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewiag Agencies. 22. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 23. That a public water system serviced by Consoiidated Irrigation District #19, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 24. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 25. That the plat dedication contain the statecnent: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. -1G- STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 MfAXWELL ADDITION - continued 26. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 27. That the sponsor shall certify prior to final plat that no private or public water sources are located on or within 150 feet of the plat boundary. 28. That all wastewater systems intended to be used by any existing structures shall be clearly identified and lacated prior to final plat. 29. That due to the limited drainfield areas on the triangular lots, it will be . necessary for no portion of a structure to be closer than 26 feet to the east ' boundary of I,ot 4, and 30 feet to the west boundary of Lot 6. 30. That an on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of the Final Plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved." - 1H - ; ~ AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAP1INER COh1MITTEE , TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #3 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZOiVE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1335-79, LUCY'S ADDITION ZE-193-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-I a. Location: Spokane Valley, bordered by Wellesley on the south, Bannen Road on the east and Bolivar Road on the west. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Block 115 of 4dest Farms Irrigated Tracts. c. Sponsor: Carol Scribner, % NW Construction Svcs.& Assoc. N 708 Argonne, Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence L. Leinweber S 3426 University Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 4.8 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 15 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Ualley #361 1. ylethod of Sewage D-i sposal : I ndi vi dual septi c tank M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be ; whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has ; adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. ' The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -3- N m ?C~84 ' U', i N _ ~ p~OP ~oa ~ .Ss 3 5 i 34 - , ~ , • ~ SArrSoW AvE fL.2041L. _r ~ . p Q ~ o 0 ° It Q .N O G ~ • ~ ~o,,.s~ I ~y Q W a T ~ • u~ O ~ ~ j p~r«r~,c ~ • ' . , , ~ ~ J tt or 1335 Q ir p PE a ~ 3 LL W .va~:rfey w.w~ . ~ Z ~ • ~ ,~s~~ ~ v W Q ~ • ~~~n, , „ ~ er: / A 4 ~o ~ Y Q ? ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ - - - ► C 8 d -~d w iE R' L39 em.5C1'~OOI Y ( ~ , . .,i!'r~: , • , :.,r.~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ 129 ~130 131 132 131 0 14 !33 136 137 13B wal:E$LEY ~ 143 144 145 146. ~7 K 151 152 153 154 155 156 I5:' 158 I~ 160 o . ~ c~ .:,ROY f M E ROY f Av. z ~ M ~ ~ . . . . . . , a~• _ ROY lG 1 ~Q8fEP0Y ~ - ^ ~ ~Uo Ft►~wW u Q a) ~ ~ ~ ~o.~ o LONGFELIOw avf~ i) \ ~ 7 a J ~I t L ~ p y;j ~ ~ I i' . . ~•i ~ ~ "~ric~~+~ ? ~ - W Co W ~ RICM AVE, ' o Z •r;~ 0 V, , 4 ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ~L • , ~ ~ RICH ,GVE m Y F W d ` t G ~ r...... 1 f~ P L.CH !av E ft . Q ~ J 10~ K W E L L J cr W r F t~CKWEI► P~ f ""~f < ~ Q RPC E pX E[ 204~ vn r, z ' ~ 0 J RO C K W E L L Y~ r = J • ~ U ~A Q ~ , J / R T ' " ON \ , 2 \ ERN p ~ ~fn \ tN ~ \ Ek rpN r~051 G , . ~o Fppko^' \M ' ~ ~a•1o00 , AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME : Fri day, September 28, 1979 - 9: 00 A.M. ( I tem #1 on Morni ng Agenda ) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMItdARY SUBDIUISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOPJ PE-1333-79, MAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Tovmship 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volume S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point tivhich is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway No. 2 and exceptthe r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKinley . 1014 1J Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer:_ Senske & Associates, Inc. -E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #,356 1. tiethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." . -1- ~ ~ li • ❑ DYtl~ D lr W Y ~ +41.1GU5TA l87 i88 W15 190 I°! ~ 205, 2Go 5 fM 177 178 1'79 I$0 18' 182 193 194 195 986 OD ~92 37. 194 195 196 k97 198 199 200 201 202 1 2D3 204 ~ " 207 e ~r MAZILLimL MAxwELL av 7ree n 4G r-C5 5c4►0ol 13.N~Q R f ~ V a 'Z . z S ~ ~ .h r 00 ~ ~ . ON E- ~ . DOONE E SMF-T ~ IiVE L ~ O:z G Fz ic':r ~~i - f~CiF ~ p 'E 14 1 GH!'AY Na 90. . , . ~ %,r VE q~`{ rJ H~ c ~ . . • ~ N-~ ~ A\l F F ~ N~ ~fo x ~ ol * T f. w+Ay ° ST OFFI 0 y~ ( 4 ~ A~iyR 'YA + ~ M ~ ~ w ~ ~p ' * af,' . ' ~1 ` . . J ~ 4+ 000 9ST ~ ~ ~ SEzOMD A,,. E 4 N I ~ ' 1 e'- ` ~i ~k,' ~ URTH ~ V OG f aU+~Tti AvE f - ~ Q _ ~ !r 1 '~y. AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISIOPJ HEARING EXAMINER COi1MITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on P9orning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1333-79, MAVWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400-ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volume S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; the south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway No. 2 and exceptthe r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey 1014 Pd Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: _ Senske & Associates, Inc. -E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. Pdumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dvrellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 . j. ulater Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #,356 1. t-lethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations autFiorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." - -1- ~ - c _ a ei ~ ~ LLJ; lx W X; ~ > ~ _ . 5'17F 177 178 179 180 I~!' 162 k83 184 85~~6{s~ 167 196 4E9 190 I°I 152 197. 194 195 196 f97 198 199 11 201 202 1 20.1. 204 207 ~ W+ w N.~ R. Mfl%WELL AV jjj'G1'Ln0Gl'eS S4..hO01 ~x , ~ D ~ ~ • +ary) I~ u u d J ~ ~~0 r4~ 4N E ~ 640Nf F SMF-T ~+A ez AvE ~pA+4~ fw4d 10 ~ ~~G+W.~~ N 90 p v 'Y V f. hM:A:, - - _ : , .1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~yfb 01 ? CWC~G~ I r , ~ . y ~ ±NLKi AV E ~ ~ E- ;1111 ~ 1..zo-55 ~ z r r + ~ 4~.~ W~Y ~ • ST OFFI { , . ~ ~►,~e ~ ~ ' ~ ► ti;_ ~ fJ 0~ Q . M ►1 M ~•Nr P9 ~ ~ SPRAU~. _ . ~ i n r~ i :100 ~ ssT 1T L ~y 414 IE 2 ►++r a . . ~ 1~~ ~ Fm IM If OURTH ^VL ~ ; t . ~ ~ N 2 t 2 , . ~ % f ) ~ . ~ t W ~soM ~ 5IOE~t~o = A~ r ~ N r RIVERSIDE ~ IRE Y, r = . L f ' ~1 1 1` I ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ly[ 19• PR GUE AvE. ' ' . " r.. ' . ~ ~•i ~ i . ~ , , . ~ ! PCST FF I CE . „ . ~ , ~ I ~ J N° 2312 ~ ~ i ~ O ~ v VO ~ a ~ 1 N ~ • q ~.c . . . . .T` ~ .1 L--&A-Al - - - - ; --w.;--- - - • - - - AVE co~n ~ $t M r ~ Parod~+i~ .`y • W SeMool ~ • o 4 T H A V E• . y J , .....0 ~Tt~. ~ ~ Q cbtof e < ~ ~ T ~ c /•74 TM > Th ~1~0 .o ~ 3 rh ~ . . . . 6rH Q ( ~ G ~ l; 6 TM ~~E t AVLj~ ~ OUff m ~ ~pTM Th (Tf~ C. y Rd.GostOJ~ • ~ ~ rw Y ~ ~.ti ~►1r A.~[ i TH A (p 'ti 17~9~ ~ 7TMI 7T~ +AtAM ' 1 ~ `~u y , A~ y O v p 16NT N AVE 0 PE 132 ~ z 91M Im 0 AC , IOtiTH T-L *AP*m&o Z L~ l c4acyatE > . . . , ~ , ~ a f•s•T~ J ' ~ , ~ 12TM AvE 12~ 'JAVE 12 TH LFT►{ iAVE 1i'~' - . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . , ~ s . X 13T}{ Q'~'E H, p ~ f.. - 13TN 13TF') AVE e WD TMI ~ a 14TH u i t I T N F T~~,~,• V 13 T H . ~ . ,1'.~r•-~E- : r►+ vg 1 FI Av... . W~ 4 EVt"GREEN ~ , , . . ~ > I JR MIGN [ ~ 15TM m ,1'~ < 16r~ ~ , ► ~ ` T V AV E ~Z~ a 4 a W v` 0 tti , m A t 30 N~ . ~ttf w~C+t ' ~ 1o r~ r .1000 W 0 Sf q~f < I! ~ tI ~ 7 . , . _ ~ • , , 2 O 1 N ~rucr et n,,,, : " . • 20 tn , AGEPdDA, September 27, 1979 TELEPHOPJE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, September -27, 1979 - 1:30 P.1-1. ( Item #3 on Afternoon Agendz PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS-1332-79, WANETA VIEIrJ ZS-204-75, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR R-I a. Location: The project is situated south of Spokane in the P1oran Prairie area, east of Wayeta Road, between 61 st and 65th Avenues and west of the Pal ouse Hi ghtiyay. b. Legal Description: Section 3, Township 24N, Range 43 E.W.M. Lots 1, 4 and 5, Block 15, Browne Park Add, according to plat recorded in Volume "I" of plats, page 27, in Spokane County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 1 and 5 deeded to Spokane County for Palouse Highway C.R.P. No. 1125, by deeds recorded in Volume 310 of Deeds page 539 and under Auditor's File iJo. 494576C; together witFi the iJ 1/2 of vacated Piedmont Road adjoining said Lots 4 and 5 on the south. c. Sponsor: Mike Senske E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Mike Senske E 9803 Sarague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 8.85 acres f. Number of Lots: 8 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or R-I j. Water Source: City of Spokane k. School District: School District #81 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be arhether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate infornation to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -9- u 55 TH Tl ~6YN 5~T g AVE. N ~ T . , , ~ ~ r ~ yTTN AVE ~ o 0 RAN a • ` 111,, ,~~~~1 1~ ~~~~~1~/j~f~ /i • - ~ . V. t STN ~Il+~l~// N ' a oc I m ~ , , , ~ 1`111~,~~~►+~ _ac ~on ~t ~ W~ _ . ~ ~ ~t~~~~~~ 1~; „ , •,..'f ~~I~Ir1'1~~~, C.rr,~4x W MQ ~r• r - ~`1 ~~~1~/~t ~///I, ~1 ~ r~~/~ ron ~ .2 8.`~ " Grange i avE. 4 , ~ ~ L1 ~ ; ~\t~,ul.•%% ; : 61ST S1332 79, Qr,. i; ~ ~lII~•.1~ ~ ~ tht~ . ~ , 1 '9/ U~ ; • t' 1 ~ ~ Qih polSt 65TH 6 _ , ' ~ ~ ~ S M ~ urch O{~T STrs AvE6.,h.. ~~M 1. . . g Moron - , , . chopj ; , S . : , 0 0 1 ~ r . - - QF ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , W • ' ' ~ N Z ' Rq , • r , ~ p 70 TH a - " ~ Q ~ ~i~• 715T ' ` • ~ ~ ~ . t ~ ,t,•t ' ' ~ .t . 8a 5409 J tR 1VENV~ AMIE SpN . . I ' 75TH ROAD j('~oO 00 1_~ \ , T7'fH ~ pARKVIE. AvENuE - 3 •w N ' . TH x Go J h~r r AGENDA, September 27, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUPJTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, September 27, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Item #1 on Afternoon PLACE: Broadvlay Centre Building, 2nd Floor Ayenda) N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMIPJARY SUBDIVISIOPJ PE-1330-79, FOREST GREEN REPLAT #3 . a. Location: The project is located in the vicinity or Netivman Lake more specifically approximately 300 feet north and west of the Intersection of Strong Avenue « Malver n Street. b. Legal Description: Section 23, Township 26rJ, Range 45 E.W.M. Lot 3, Block l, Forest Green Subdivision Replat No. 1 c. Sponsor: Joe Ward . S 813 Pines Spokane, 41A . 99206 d. Engineer: Charles Simpson N 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 5 acr2s f. Number of Lots : 2 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Water Source: Moab Irrigation District #20 j. School District: East Valley #361 k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environnental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -7- 1 t• ~ ~ I • ~ 1 , . J ' V I{I~ 570, , tl~Jr Ik ,,r.•-~~~~r Oll. q ul, : ~ ~ ^.~3~Q M•~ ' ~ 3~ . . zi ~ r ~'n► . : EL ~'n~~`` . SS ro d ~ _ ql " 1 N 53 U) ` ~ ti 34 . . \MW , 1 ,1. ~ i~R' • , Il ~ . 1 ~ .~w1~~ ir, + 4b - ~ ~ 0 ~o • : • o~ ~ ',4S , ' ~ . ` ~ ; 7 w b. - 6 ~ . ~ l :1 ~ i ~ - t " , r►~~ ~ ~ % • ~ 'r)~~' v+mOn 3030 ~ 10 aa •'~r` ~ 1 , ~a,avo R~ ' , ~ ' ~ ; ti ~ 5~oe ►e 4 f 4'~14 ~ ~ ~ 1 • 8 ~ o . C. ~ o ~ • ' . . i 3 _ 1 ~ ` . ~ ~ rni*r'~" A; ~ ~ir% ti 11 4 •y ~ d , ~t►'+'~ f o'"`~ h4 ' ' " , , w~, ~it 140 23 ~ fL tt1~ . ~ ► . , ~ ~o~ ,I' • : 46 L,nc° ~ i h~ ~ • ~ ~p ' + ~ ~ ' ` ' ' PKL o NEw E 1 . r ~ MOa~ a 12 ~ ~ : ~ ~y N ~ ~ ~ ' ~ /i~ ~ly~ n`.o A . / • " ~~l+~~~~ ~1 ~ 1 ~ 27 Q~ ob~ o ~ ti . ~ • On . _ . ~ } d5 . 30 ~ 25 ni~ ' ' '~~~a~' • e « i ti ~1 ~Ar ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ylpl++~' w , r'e~ ~ . ~•,R~ ~ . ~ , ` . ~Z 4 . s ~ ' j,~ •/li~~y` ' ~ < - i • J► s, * , ' ~ ~'u , y~5►~ f ~ r AGENDA, September 27, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COP•1MITTEE TIME: Thursday, September 27, 1979 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #5 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd F1oor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOiV AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1328-79, ESTHER'S ADDITIOiJ ZE-191-79, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valle, between 4th & 8th Avenues, approximately 430 fto west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Tract 234 of Opportunity, as per plat thereof recorded in Uolume "K" of plats, page 20; EXCEPT the N 300 ft. of the E 132 ft. and EXCEPT the S 20 ft. for road purposes; located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, 4Jashington. c. Sponsor: Dwight Hume E 9616 Montgomery Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyors & Engineers: Adams, Benthin & Clark, Inc. W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA. 99201 e. Site Size: 8.6 acres (approx.) f. Number of Lots: 2 g. Proposed Land Use: Multiple family dwellings (Townhouses) h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. . Method of Setivage Disposal: Individual septic tanks & community drainfields. M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: "......In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -5- 0 4t 4 p . a x Q ~ r r : . ~ 0 < +r'~`~' r ' d R►v~~s~ax N + W p ~ 1'~~ ~u!. ' ' tl► It 2 0 ' 8 19 o' ~ r d re g0 2 : ° 4~ ~ ' ~ to~~vr+ ~pAD Z Rpqt Il f H4' RIN tON ~RrvER M1GWA~KEE ~RA ~ , r`~`~'' ' ► c"O 5 e v. p . , . - ~ . .2 I ° p ic 4 I t I i ~ ~•I' • ~ ~ 20 ~ 14 • py ~ U ~ J6 pURT U) CC . ~ ~ ~ H ~ Y r+ g t►+ Z ~ ~ a $ ~ 8 9TN t4' ,o tx . . c E16~ H 2a' ~ Ul~ . M• , RCN£Ry gtt ►w'' tath AVE- sot► , ' ~ ~ a `~.~►i'.i!P....~~,~ ~ ► ' Ps~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-t,i4'N~~•%~• Q o0. . ~ Iit ~A0 4 ' r M ~ • + ~ ~O ' I . ~r,; r. S ' ~ ' ~;i• I b \ ' 991 4 . M)1y~,». . 1 1 AGENDA, September 27, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANfdING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, September 27, 1979 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #5 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1328-79, ESTHER'S ADDITION ZE-191-79, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valle between 4th & 8th Avenues, approximately 430 .f t. west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Tract 234 of Opportunity, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "K" of plats, page 20; EXCEPT the N 300 ft. of the E 132 ft. and EXCEPT the S 20 ft. for road purposes; located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, 4Jashi ngton . c. Sponsor: Dwight Hume E 9616 Montgomery - Spokane, GJA. 99206 d. Surveyors & Engineers: Adams, Benthin & Clark, Inc. W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, LJA. 99201 e. Site Size: 8.6 acres (approx.) f. Number of Lots: 2 ~ g. Proposed Land Use: Multiple family dvJellings (Townhouses) h. Existing Zoning: ' Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks & community drainfields. M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -5- 0 ~ 0 4 l 0 c~ r 4 a~',.. ~ r• 4 ~ AVE I 0 t( '`~AY J • ~ i ~ r 3~ ' t ° 5tih• ~ ` r . 4 R~~~~ytflt N N ~ 7 I 9 e ' Q. ~ ~ ~ , r ~~~j•. , o Z~ F jr8 t04►a, ~pAv Z '•4 s' i U 4 C1`~~jNT ~ J 0 Rql LRppt ~ Z ~ / Ha. RIN rot+ RIVER )WI~tA ILwAUKEE vt ' R• ~ S L o14~ q ~ " . ~'e' - ~ ~ , Q ; c . ~ t - ao ~ ; r V ~ v J 1w ~A ~ ~ A'~ ~y} 1 J► ►/1 Mi • F ~ v r1~ ' ~ ~j ~ X a J1 -7T~ ; , ' 7N s ~SH . 9t►+ w 3 tt~ a ~ ,10 r Q \ ~~GH r Za. N r ~ ~ ~ ~ . ; r'.; :i' . tt~ B t N .A '"'.~i „ 911. ,arh AvE. 1 j' . ~,y ~ ~ x t~'r ' ~ p,rs~{: ` ' ~ • 4 4 Sa~ f ,ot► ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ • ' ~ ► Q~e i ' ' ~ ~ ~ ' f • I 1 t O tos4p~ ~ r ~ 11 , ~ ,/~Oa ~ ~ 0 : + . ~ M , • I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i . 199 1 ► ~ ,_i- p . • ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ 1 AGENDA, Septenber 27, 1979 TELEPHONE; 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMTNER COMMITTEE TIi1E : Thursday, September 27,1970- 0: OJ A.'i.( I ten 42 on i'lorni ng -;c enda PLACE: Groadv±ay Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMIPdARY SUBDIVISIOU APJD ZOPdE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1326-79, HAGER'S EAST VALLEY PLAT ' ZE-184-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-I a. Location: Southwest corner of We71esley &Ashton Roads b. Legal Description: Section 4, Township 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. The E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Govt. Lot 4 of Section 4, and the North 20 ft. of the East 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Govt. Lot 4 c. Sponsor: Gordon Curry E 9211 Trent Spokane, WA. 99206 .d. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson fd 909 Argonne Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: Approximately 5 acres f. Number of Lots: 11 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley School District #356 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks . M. Environmental Impact: A topi.c of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the aoverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: "....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -2- . . . ,~„r._ . ~ 3 ' . . - W. - - m 2 a kone t o oi . Q 10 PQ ~ I Qo 9UEEM ~"v~ . Q D. ~ EL, P~ l 7k5, ~ YMP ~ • - Z ~ . t~ ~[YMP► , w . Ct. h~rd d a ~ Z 0 5r ~ Chppls I • Y ~ ix'SW a 51 aFF~~E !PE ~ • y~ C a VyELLEIL Y ; ~ a~►u~ E 2 , S505 , ~ ,k oc . a ~ . ~ ~ 4 a QI ~ / a ' I ~ 0 - v ~ < 4 ' 0 + ~1QQo a ,,v o: ~ 7 ~ CL Q p~ ~~o~~~ Z ~ Q ~ ~ I► , , . v ' ~ ,p . ~ 0 File No. PE-1333-79 ZE-210-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE , FINDINGS AND ORDER A. I NTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 28, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson, Jane Myers, and Pau) Sceva, Jr. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, J. Brent McKinley, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PE-1333-79, Maxwell Addition and ZE-210-79, Agricultural to R-1 and R-2 for subdivision of 3 acres into 6 lots for single family dwellings and duplexes. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This proposal was withdrawn from the Hearing by the Sponsor. D. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of J. Brent McKinley for a preliminary plat, Maxwell Addition and a Zone change as described in the application was withdrawn. 1 i . ~ ~In co E L ?0B 4 . . 40 , SArVSON AvE EL. 2041Q ~ . O i . . 0' , . Q Q - Q ~ 0 'I I i . Q .N ~ O ~ ~ ~OYtCN C)' ~ ~ p~r•,•t. . ,lr . .~asf, . ' PE 1335 79 Z W > LL.~ W •VQ ~ 1 e w....., ` 10 J W bCh Z . y ` ~ v W I o ` Z 468 ~ _ ~.I.•vvi ~ ~ ..f . i Or;~L ; I 3c~~wiE R 6) 1 13 9 2 WZ ' em,SCtmI ~ Y ;Y+~t-'~ 129 130 13 i 132 131 0 I4 136 137 134 yy E.t.:~SLEY 0 143 a4 145 146 ~7 r 151 Is 153 154 156 i5:' 158 I% 460 ROy MEPOY AV 17 ov ~ I NE~y 4vI R~ . . ~ ~ ~ O 'E~Y ' M 7Z ` . . I g o Uloas ~ • LLowW ~ ; A F \ a (D ~ LONGFEIIOW av~,~ 3) p • W Q S w ~.~ndsir''~ ? ~ . ~o ~ a j~ i v' RICH AVE. ~ o z ' ' , • ~ . . I a t: - f ' Rk CH QvE. F W ~ . . ~ . R 6CN lavE a Q . -1 ~ 4 - - - - "CrwELL J ~ W L R~L KvN EI. j 4• ~ J F, Q _j a K e ~ D z 41 z ' E[ 2041 ~n 3 g Q IV/ f D - W ~ ROCKWELL Y m ~ ~ o Q f - ; - ~ or ~ ' ~ ~ . . - ~ - • BRI ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,,,,r r•-~•,.,-` ` ~ R T . S T EN ~ ~ ~oN .?0?6, N , r 3 A. ~ z \ - ER N RtN E M~ or.v ~ I 6 toNne f ~ SI . I y~ ~ 9~RL SooM,~~ M ~ 1 -1000 ~ \ . AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLAPJNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: . Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #3 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor tJ 721 Jefferson, Spokane - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APJD ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOy PE-1335-79, LUCY'S ADDITION ZE-193-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-I a. Location: Spokane Valley, bordered by Wellesley on the south, Bannen Road on the east and Bolivar Roa:d on the west. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Block 115 of West Farms Irri gated Tracts. c. Sponsor: Carol Scribner, % II4J. Construction Svcs.& Assoc. N 708 Argonne, Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence L. Leinweber S 3426 University Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 4.8 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 15 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural . i. Proposed Zoning: R-1 ' j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District 73 ~ k. School District: East Valley #361 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tank ~ M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be ; whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act tiJAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: "....In the event that the furth er investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -3- . • ' . ~ ' . • . , ' ' ~ Pioneer National Title Insurance Company ~ WA9NINOTON aT/►T[ DIVISION , ~ . ~ . . ' ' o~, i . _ • • • • ' ` , . . . , ~ ~ 1 R` .c>~' . • . . . SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT ~ Your Loan No. ~To: Simpson Enginaers Inc. North 909 Ar'gOririe , OurOrderNo. . Spokane, Washington 99206 (Mortgagor) . _ ~ ~ . (Purchaser) CC: Planning Commission ~ CC : James tilinner ~ There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since ~ . ' August. 13 ; 19 79 , at 8 A.M. . ~ ~ Except as set forth below: 1. None. ~ . • , '4~,,e•' , , - ~ ' • . .,A . ' . v . . ~ ~ ~ _ • . • ~ ~ ~ • 11 . (.~~\a~~~ , ~i ~ . ~ ~ • Dcted as of the ,_2 Ht W'a.y•of Se-at2mb er 197 C)8 A.M. . . ~ ~ ~ Pioneer National Title Insurance Company S. .ANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Communication Date October 1. 1979 TO: Files and Svokane Co. Planning FROM: Dennis Kro11, R.S. i. SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - Maxaell Addition J~ 1.) Reference: Our memo to you dated July 11, 1979 subject as above. . 2.) Changes: a) Paragraph 2(d) of ref erence 1 above shall be changed to C.I.D. #19 public wells. b) Paragraph 4(d) of reference 1 above shall be deleted. cc: Senske & Associates E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 . ee ~ r . 00" ~ D 4, F SCHD-ADM-118 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SrOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , Iater-olfice Comwwucation to pIANNING LEPARThENT , fmo GARY KENNALY R PLANN ING & TRAFF IC DIY I.g ION ENG IINEFR Sukj.ct-APID c:4NMM * 10 _PLAT t'-P 1.33.~ ~ ta ' ,26 *OONDTT ION3 C IA,C ~APPLY TO PI1lT UNAER CONS IDEAIT ION • - - (pUHLfC`RQAD STAN - - PRIYATE ArOAD STAI~ID~~RD3 - - - arooal of~he at in iven eub •ct to ~ PP p g j dedicatioa o! Right ot Way aod approval of the road systen in the plot by the Couoty Lngiaear = ~that plans, protil*s, and aroes eectione ehowing propoeod •treet conterliw aad ausb grade• •ubaitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to coastructioa tad the'filiag of a tiaa platj ~_that drainage plaiu and design aalculatione ehoWing the grade• aad alignoent ot draiaage taailitie• be •ubnittod to the County Engixieer tor approval prior to oonstructioo and the lili.og of a tinal piat; ~ ~Iaonatruction vithin the proposed publia etreete an+d eaeemente shalrl be perlormed undor the direct aupervisiou ot a liceassd laad survoyor, who shall be respoasibls tor psrpetw►ti.ng al evid,enos ot the looation of survey monumeats whicD may bs dieturbed durirg conatruotioQ aad who shall turnimb Lhi Couaty Engineer vith "Ae Huilt" plana aud a certifiaate in writing tha a11 igpronmsat• wre inatallsd to tbe liaes aad gradee ahoWD OA the approved oonatruotioo plana aad tbat all disturbod maurnwnte have beea reRlaaod j ~_na coostruatioo work is Lo be perPormad tiithin the Pub11o Right o= Way uatil a pornit ha• b*4 lesuod by ths CouAty Eagiwer. All work i• subjeot to iaapectioo and approval by the County Fagiaeerj 6411 construotion within t,ho Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to liliag the tinal plat or • boad ia tbo aawuat •etimated by the County Engineer Lo aovsr the cost 'of coastruot; of improvoments, construotioa wrtificatioo, "As Built" plans, and monunwatirg ths street aonterliwo sh+all be tiled with the County Enginser;. 1 that allJlr~e vitbin the plat be curbed and/M Paved Lo L~ ePecifications of the Cout~tY ~ Enginser. Ecieting CounLy roads providiug direct acoess to lote of the plet ehall be paved •nd/w curbed Lo the etarydarde ot the Couaty Engineer. . l2-Propoesd privat• roed(a) serviug lots viths no exteneion poeeiblej ssteneloo ta servr 8 or leee lots; luture public Right of Way traat. 13-ttut private road(s) bs iqproved to atandard adopted by the Board of Couaty Commiasloiure. g~-no direct accee• froo lote to J9ro AdtvAr &e~, ~_dedication o! FEE? additioaal Right of Way alo ' 61varov. .9, C. 1-that the ownsr, hie granLees and assigne egree to participete in sad not oppose or protest an RID MR g~ c ~~j Dc dc ; c aTto K e~ add'I-tl oovA C. 1e~9 ~i7' wi4 4/o.v $roqq~w~v Av~~~E AS ~e tcTC- Ct viv D ~ 7~t e ~i.y y ~a ~ E d y` s~ 12Eco2~{ , yl~lc A wto u K"t a h ok C~ i rr~ e M S i o~! e ~ ~rlf ` s t A; s Q t g" o4 wA y w'11 b e 'ttb rt%~ Ce ~K~- • e 't" 9'~ ~ e r i N C e.v c~.1 f.~-~ ~ o~ w ; M Qla. SPaNSd 2 ~ ; r ~ ' SPOKANE COUN7Y ' I ~yI'1R 1A' V1 ~,y~ljf, r.ad~ ._.h:_~ PLANN[NG QEr p ~7 ^~MEI 7 p 4" J ~ 6 N. 721 JEFF5FiSON P.9 R ~ 4 Y~ C Y a'~! M Y F i L~ dl ~ r~ 4a d«• ~ SPOKaNE, WASKINcTaN 99260 J~~~~' ~t 1-0 iw Y~au ry r , • ~ ~ Ronald J. 3aske ~ ,Y E 12514 Sprague ~ J w9 SPokane, WA. 99216 ' ; ~ . , VED _E s+r( y LEF~ ~DDRESS 1979 w ' a C' ~ , 11 ~cn R~~~~~ ~ENDER , ~ >1 < ~ C51 r ~ ~ " _ ~ _ ° - - - • ~ - - ~ _ . - - - _ ' - ~ 0 (A . L-) a) I S- ~ r-- rd SPOKANE COUNTY - ~ f - - ~ ao a! PLANNING DEPARTMENT t 4 7QD ~ i' °^`'k. ° _ = ~ , c1 ~ W S- ~ • ~ ~ . ~c.`i~ "flJ~SI"S~~~v ~ w ~ ~I. 721 J=FFERsa~v ~ ~ SPOKANE, WASHI~lGTO~! 9926~7' SEPI °9 f, ~ry l ~~y~,~~, " q ~I•, :rI ~ n .•~3 4'~~ ~ I , ~ ' ~ ~,t• ~ ~ ~ : ~,~3 ~ • 5usan J. Kerbs z ~ BOWd15~1 ,`a~ ~Ct~f1Eq Wpl. 99206 SpL~ ~ ~ t~' y1, ~4 I I s q~ a ~9 e~} ~t ~f E ' ~ , ~ ~ UC F[ ~ Z F- z ~ ER 1979 0 z , M ti~ ~ "--T~,.~N TO SENCER ~ Wti~ w s z AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUtJTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #3 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1335-79, LUCY'S ADDITION ZE-193-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-I a. Location: Spokane Valle,y, bordered by Wellesley on the south, Bannen Road on the east and Bolivar Road . on the west. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. The S 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Block 115 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts. c. Sponsor: Carol Scribner, % NW Construction Svcs.& Assoc. N 708 Argonne, Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Lawrence L. Leinweber S 3426 University Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 4.8 acres f. Number of Lots : 15 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Di sposal : I ndi vi dual septi c tank M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act 4JAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -3- ~ ✓ 5POKANE VALLEq FIPAE DE-)ARTIAENT ~ s&I"&e, ~~4 7",& V6W. EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 Sentember 24, 1979 Marcia Raines SpoE:ane County Pl anni ng Commi ss ion N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Ra i nes, The fol 1 oVai ng zone cl ass i fi cati ons for upgrad i ng have been revi eared for fire protection: PE-1333-79 Maxwell Addition ZE-210-79 McKinley PE-1334-79 Mica View 3rd Addition ZE-192-79 Rice PE-1335-79 Lucy's Addition ZE-193-79 Scribner PE-1336-79 Able Addition ZE-195-79 LeBlanc PE-1337-79 Mamer Addition ZE-196-79 Teeter Mains and hhydrants need to be installed ip the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit, issuance. S i n y , . ~~3 , - ` Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn ~ PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?~'~~~.~C .r.~:~T'~~ C ?M~"_""~~ ~ ^ ~ r .'3~'~'".~l~r :{.r!"',~`~J ~,~f r. ~1.C~i.ti~~~ .v.`~..,~, 1~",: ~~~:1~ ~.~`~`e'~ ~fir.~.Rmm~: T ~~L...~ ~.,z, ~ ~LI~ ~ , ~ ~ R ~ ~T~ , : _ ~ .~.~~~.~ca~.,a_, . ) - - - ~ i ~ ~ :Ta. ~ ~ ~ .t. ~ ~ ~ . } ~ 3 ; ~~~~.1C~ v~~21 .f~ ~ . ~ r' ~ ti r~ - _ ~4;.~?~..eC21'' _ a - d::~? :..C~.,"1"~ -I~ ~ C , ' ~ i . ~ ~ . ~ ~ '~'f f'x' ~~~~,_~~r:t ~ 4- - Ti -MJ~s iT~1 1" P nh v+O/'y ~i++~ 'I'~ vl~~~.'~ ~ , . M~~4JL4~Y~ a~»~~ L~ if r 'J~a a~~Lf d+ ~cr. ~ ~ P T ' > x- Nr~ _ 'w~ '~{J ~i'~ ~r~ t~+4 n~[ ~~ry~}, Sk ~ T .,,,,y •r g,, 1 a . ~~i~'iJ'i. ~'Sl~a~~'4•Y JiiL ~M _ i+i'~4w1:1 ~ ~ U~ ~l ~ ~~~'~'~w'i~ v'i+~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t r ~~T~.. . ~ .4u P~ r'~ ~ 'T ~ C~R ~I~~,rr~ a U4 L ~.J~..~.a1XL~I Qi~~~~~'_~U~`"~.°i ~~~v'~~.~w'; ~ ,T...,,,~ , - . y.,. ~ l. ~-7 ~ ~ ~ fi ~ ' . ~3-',~'~,~ ~ ~ ~at~ ~'::;~''~"r ~ ~ :1"L~ ~'r~:,~~~ ~ Cs.i ' ~ a~'". t'7 ~R~`' ~'sf _ ^ 7 ~ . /y~y i~ ry ~ wy. ~trl_ ~ w. ..~~r ~b ~ vV ~~}V4i ~'Y~„~~,5~ *'J ~t.~~f ,fl~ ~Y.nll-..:r, ~~'~'^~+~7 ~ S►^+1 ~ ~ . ~ _ , fi~l ~ r . ~ ~ , ~ - - r , r' tr ~ } ~,r,-' ; -p : t ~.~i'A ~ r~ ~ ~ N ~ ~'f,+ ~ ! E ~ s g ~j y }qy f .15+a,J~ ~~~+~s7~ r`~~ ~..1 u lJ1 ~..e ~ k , ~ - ~`r ~ ~ ..I .~::',E ~1 ~+P~ ~ , / ~ ~ ~ ~ F . . . . j _ ~ 4 . . ~~~~{~~til '4 f'.?~ . 4~' ~4 ~ ~ ~g~ - ~ r ~ ~ ,~'i.L~.~.r ~ _ i 'tl '9~rc I' p - FS~,i. . r~ ~ ~ ~ f, ~ ~ ► l ~C , w a . _ ~ ~ , .S~ 1 ~~f~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , M . 7 .^R. _ ~ 7 . 1~, ~ ~ ~~=..1~ ~.a'~`.~ . _ ~'.~'s.~1~r CG~~~1~~' ~ ~:I~ :~{~~~`Yr COr~~,~_*~~' q'w ' v T~r a t x~~a q~~ T ~C4~~V ~V1e ~3~+~~ ~a:~.`l~'+l~' ,C41~7~~ ~~~...i~ t : - /7 It _ ~ • `fl ~~n1 ~ ~j ~7 ~ ; n U+.l.i~'L~.~_~ ~C7;._..C~~.~~~.~~. r` +~~,1..~.,.~~~~+J'_: `3 ~ st ~ :1 .~a~, ;.J~ _ , - - . ~ I r ~ ' T.. }~C~"I`'~' i a :~1~t7~~C'~.~';"G , : . ~ ~~~~_~C~'.►'`1 v t , _ _ _ T ~ i,~ ~Lry "~C~?Y",~ "j..~l ~I^.c ~ . T_ ~~~~~:~.C~ ~'.t:~ L~ Q:: '"°CJ: ]:"s ~'[l~'~:~~ ~:1G . ~ i;4Li~.C, ~G' Ca ~ ~C~J~"~ lIl ~~i'.~'C~ :;1~' . ~ ~ M r~ ~ ~r ~ 1~~ ~ +r ~ .4~~,. rAv~~ .?~r0.~ ' ~ ~P~~'~..~~°i ',f r~ ~ m'r~r , w~~~"1"?~~ i 1J'~s ~~n+~..~~V.1 K` ,r ~ ~ ~ M~ ~ . ~i, •p ~ ! ~ r. e ^ ~ . ~s' r~~. • R ~ T+ ~ ~ ~ i y +kf ~t i 1. ~i. 9 . t s; l ~ f ,~,.1 • ~ ~~L" ~ 71 ~0 ~~l ~~r..~:1 _ v .r3;' . ~ `*'~Ll ? 4 w`'1=~ La~++: ~~Ll ,~w~ ~.3 ~:L~L.~ , J .y. . • V-"^• , ti'~'' ~rt ,....J i~ ~y.c~ . ~It7 - ~ .~~C ~ , ~ , J , . y~ ^ ~ r/ yMG.~p + ~~„'~43~3 ~'7"':h ~ Iti~~~f~o, i , ? 1 ~7CA ~;•n~{'• :'C~..":Q p~~e~.~~ L+ 14 q y _ i a ~e ~ • ~ W r a ~ 1 ~ ! / ~ '~V + s ~ i- ~ l 1 ~ 'r ' ~ / ~i r"+,.t'tn /1~~ ~pJ A r:.~i 4+~ .r f r ~~r ~r ~ ~ L~7 Y~ ~ 1 ~ } ~ A ~ ~ .iM .r~ ~ ~r f r r~.•_. . 5;: ~ J ~ ' ~ ~ ~`l ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ~r ) ' ~ - ~ - _ - ~ , i . AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAh1INER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1333-79, MAY,WELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 . a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Tovmship 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volurie S, page 30 of "Plats" in ihe Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft: east of-the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Bloc{: 9 to the PO6. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway , No. 2 and except the r/tiv deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey . 1014 N Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and dupiexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. rlethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal'. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -1- c, ~ p ' • . DJIN a O ~x W ~ ► Q~ ~J W j ~ > ~ . - AUGUSTA tgl 188 ~9 190 2Go ~ 5'R6 ~77 ~78 179 180 18' 182 183 184 185 186m i92 ,37. 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 242 1 203 204 205 -MAAWrLL ~ N 7NR MAx wELL av ~Gt'~noCres Sc~~oo, g= a' (L~le►nt}~torr) Q ~ v . e s W ,~L--! , I. . r ~ W R ~ OpN~ . . ' QNE 8 . u OON 600 NE ~ E SMEr . AVE ~ ~ - - E NtG ' , ..~p 1333 79 ~V!'~Y N° ~ ° - ~ _ ..AV • 1a , s r ~ `Li,~Er wA r ~ A ~ ~ ~ I .1'1 r~ ~ ~t~ON ~ aV rCN,C ~ !AM ME ) ^ QO~cPNE l ) L.POSS ~ ' ' r q' ~ } P _E.Iv WAY ~ ST OFFI ~ ` AvE ~ ~ ~ (J N O ► e r A$ M . ~ 0o r~' • ~ a _ ~ - ~ 99 p i i 4 SPRAGuE 00, STV" 00 o r I - - ~ M O ~ isr I ~a.100Q/; ~ L ~ • ~ Se::oNo a. E 2 „d A-, .a !c n ~ ~ 1 MKOr.s~y T~A • 1••~ ' QURTM yFm F Oual'M AVE ~ Q ' ~y . ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 PE-1333-79, MfAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICIJZTURAL TO SINGLE (R-1) AND TWO (R-2) FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL IATFORMATION A. I;ocatioa North and adjacent to Alki; south of Interstate 90; and approximately 400 feet west of Barker Road. B. Proposal - 3 acres subdivided into 6 lots for single and two family use ' - Lot frontage = 85 feet to 220 feet - Lot size = 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses At the present, the site is a vacant and undeveloped piece of agricultural land. The areas to the south and southwest do support a blend of various living units, such as mobile homes and duplexes. The land to the west of the proposal, exhibits cultivated alfalfa and pasture fields, accompanied by several single family dwellings. To the south, you will find more cultivated fields, along with a greater concentration of single family dwellings. Further south, are lands utilized for commercial and industrial purposes. . To the east of the project, the land use resembles the same as to the south. You have designated pasture lands and cultivated fields, with single family dwellings throughout the area, and commercial property to the southeast. i And finally, north of the proposal, are scattered single family residences, and of course, the freeway. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The sponsor has requested the development of s-ix lots ranging from 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. in size. He has also proposed single and two family residential use. The proposed uses and lot sizes would appear to be compatible with all the tax segregated parcels in the area, which do range from 13,000 sq. ft. to almost 2 acres in size. -1B- STAFF ANAI,YSIS - September_ 28, 1979 MAXIOM-T.L ADDITTON - continue$ ' II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation (Not received at time of printing) (See Engineer's Memo) B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis- posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be • utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 6 lots on 3 acres with a typical lot size of 12,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternativ_es for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd coasidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The.analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. - 1C - ' STA'E'F ANAI,YSIS - Septemb,- 28, 1979 MA"`-'ELL ADDITION - continued c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.07 to 1.8 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.16 to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to IO ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. C. Draina$e The County Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drai.nage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately haadle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supp ly The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plans. F. Schools Proposal lies within the•boundaries of Central Valley #356. -1D- STAFF ANAI.YSIS - September.- 28, 1979 MAXT-T.L ADDITION - continued ' ~ G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that a 7 acre neighborhood park and a 10 acre elementary school just west of Flora will best serve the needs of the residents in the area. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources None have been indentified. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The proposal is presently zoned Agricultural. The property to the north and west are also zoaed Agricultural. To the south, is Agricultural, Commercial, and Industrial properties, whereas, to the east, the area is zoned Agricultural and Commercial. The sponsor is requesting duplex uses on Lots S and 6 of the plat. There is no dupleA zoning in the immediate area although there are duplexes on scattered segregations. If the plat is approved, R-1 and R-2 zoning should be provided as outlined in the recommended conditions. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW . An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental itnpacts were judged to exist. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; fiora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. • 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwellin$ structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - lE - STAFF ANALYSIS - Septemb,--- 28, 1979 MAXtaELL ADDITION - continued 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and Eire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. • 8. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to October 1, 1980. 9. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving actioa in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. The drainage plans and dasign calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. -1F- STAFF ANALYSIS - September_28, 1979 MAX~`L ADDITION - continued ' 13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the Caunty Engineer. 15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the a.mount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of i.mprovements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the Countp Engineer. 16. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Plan.ning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. 18. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions 19. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 20. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified on Lots 5 and 6 to Two Family Residential, and Single Family Residential on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. 21. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. Al1 extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 22. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 23. That a public water system serviced by Consolidated Irrigation District #19, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 24. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 25. That the plat dedication contain the statement: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. - 1G - • -STAFF ANALYSIS - Septemr , 28, 1979 Mpj';+IELL ADDITION - continued 26. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 27. That the sponsor shall certify prior to final plat that no private or public water sources are Iocated on or within 150 feet of the plat boundary. 28. That all wastewater systems intended to be used by any existing structures shall be clearly identified and located prior to final plat. 29. That due to the limited drainfield areas on the triangular lots, it will be necessary for no portion of a structure to be closer than 26 feet to the east ' boundary of Lot 4, and 30 feet to the west boundary of Lot 6. 30. That an on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of the Final Plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage maaagement association until said association is dissolved." - 1H - . . , . . . _ • ..~fi~' ~ r F11e # T* - ~ . Soc. T'sh'p R'9e ► Cla6sification 1 , : Proponont ~ ~ = " ~ ,x ~ ~ ! • , F V ~iP.~ ,C.~c. ~ r P ~ f'C AC - : ''-',~.t•' --4OE_ ,~~'-}~_T T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M 1 N A T I 0 N ProLosed/ DECLARATION OF Non-significant (proposed/tinil ) (siqniticance/non-sign itlcince) 1. Description of Proposal . 5/ F-.,s _ 2. Proponent: C: v 4q!~'644 7- - )00 3. Contact Person : ~ __'S Phons: ~az r-- 4. County Aciion(s) Requested : Zone ChanQ• - PreIlmfnary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Chanp• of Condttion . Other : 5. Location of Proposal : ~-~~^1,~;, r- f,f.^ S= ~ • t ~'~S1~E1~4-r~ c ~10 . 6. Lead Agency : SPOKAN E COUNTY, WASN I NGTON This proposaf has been determined to not have a slgnificant adversa innpact on the environment. An EIS IS not required und•r RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). T hi s deci sion was mad• atter review by the County of a comploted environmental checklist and othor information on file with th• Lead Agency. 7. Responslble Official: Proposed Oeclaration : F inal Declaration : Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name Signature , Signature Tille Planning Director Title Depdrtment Current Planning Department Oate September 129 1979 Oate September 27, 1919 Revised 6/1/79 > ~ SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Lngirreers & Land Surveyors September 26, 1979 h1r. Wal 1 ey Hubbard N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Wash. 99201 Dear Wal -I ey: Due to unforseen circumstances I hereby request that PE-1333-79, Maxwell Addition be continued indefinitely. Appar- ently there is adifficulty between the seller and purchasor which needs to be resolved prior to hearing the matter before the Hearing Examiner. We do hope that the matter will be resolved in one to two months. Thank you. Sincere1y, 3_ - ~ Thomas W. Slade Development Consultant TWS/dp y ~ ~0 ~1,WA EAST 9803 SPRAGUE AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • BUS. (509) 924-3759 t VALLECI FIRE DEPARTIAENT ~ S&A-a& 61~4 7~ ~~~c&w Ala / ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 Z?i4 September 20, 1979 . ally Hubbard Plat Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission Second Floor Broadway Centre auilding N721 Jefferson +Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Hubbard, The following prelirpipary subdivisions & zone classification for upgrading has been reviewed for flre protection: PE-1328-79 PE-1335-79 ~ ~ PE-1333-79 P~-1336-79 t PE-1334-79 PE-1337-79 . Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting. eq,uipment shallbe approved prior to buildinn permit i$sc:e. . ~ ~ , • / r . . s ,ok" Lt. of Inspectors . AC: sn ~PRE VE1VT FIRES SA VE LI VES . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . } . ~ , r a ~ e - ~ ~ ~ t x - , . y YO ~ i .i L~ t( s~ r" . ~ ,4, ~ ~ ~ .r ~ ' r.. e- . c. o ~ ' • . ~ DV~IN ~ 0 ~x W QO W ' . > " AUGUSTA I$7 188 ~9 190 I° 195 186 i ' m5' 2Gu i 78 179 180 16' {82 183 t84 m i 92 , 3'. 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 t 203 204 ~ 207 ~ m- MAXWELL MAXW E I L AY iCGt'eehOCreS SCh00l ~ TZ H~, ~ d ~s Z Pv E . ° w R ONE ~ N , 8p , I~ . . ON E ~ - . ~ ~ SOONE E SMET • ~NE7 ~ i AYE ~ r %0~ R E HtGHWaY N° 90 131111MW3 79 LP p~ ~ L . 18 • - r r 1c . ~ ~iLKI r~vE iD r z5~c0" , c N L.20S1 r z J . . + ~ , ~ ' , J~~ ► P~ _E.r wA y ~ ST OFFI f, ' ,/;.r~'• i I I , AvE i. • J lJ N ~ y~ 0 ~ I LJF- I SPAAGuE ~ r M p ~ tiT 1~:1000 Z ~ < • f ~ ~ ' ~ SE.OND AN. E 2 ~d•,~ Y . i .c . < `x4..~,,, nR • I • ~ , rQURTN V~ ~ F ouaT►, Avc ' ' a ; /1 , ~ AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAh1INER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIh1INARY SUBDIVISION AND ZOPdE RECLASSIFICATIOPJ PE-1333-79, MAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof'recorded in Volume S. page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 f t. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the tJ line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft.. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway No. 2 and exceptthe r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey 1014 N Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer:_ Senske & Associates, Inc. ' - E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. Pdumber of Lots: 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. rlethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be vrhether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -1- c. . DNIN iy , 0 ~x W cxo ~ W• ~ W u > ~ . " . r 5~7F ~ 77 ~ Zg I?9 190 18' 182 183 184 A5~S,.,86 ~ 187 188 ~9 190 i° i i S2 , j~, 194 195 196 197 196 199 200 201 242 ~ 203 204 x'5 ; 2~ iO7 ~ ~ C~r~nOCres 5C~~00i : d W B,NR R. ~ Z MAXWELL AV u Q„ (Elemttary) 't ~ V ;WU ~ u Q E , I . r. v a N 8 0° ~ HDN E u - ~ ~ ~ I 5OONE ~ M T ME7 E S E % ~ A . o p ~ a;;~ . . a 0 . . , ~F , c 'E NICH1KaY N° 90 v Y vE ~ F s P . , g yflc► ; ~ ~ L) I ~ 0 r ~ CNlC►~~ , JS r ~ J ~ ~ aV ~ t !ALKI AVE i0 f~E C :in N `PO ~i L.?OSS Y Z WAy , ST OFFI f ~ .~.r~►,~ i I I . A AdE ~ . MAIN I ~ ool ~ - F ;r ~ ~a PP ~ . -E ~ SPFiAGUE " _ . 1 ~ O I / 1a:1000 . ~ 1tT SE--ONC) A\. F f~ ' r 2 ^dA" Y . , ~P . N N e 1 .+rca..~~~ nA • A • LL - _ , ~ , qU~RTN ~Vt m F OURTN ~vc AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHOVE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIUISIOPJ HEARING EXAh1INER COMMITTEE TIME: . Friday, September 28, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Znd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZOhdE RECLASSIFICATIOPd PE-1333-79, MAXWELL ADDITION ZE-210-79, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 AND R-2 a. Location: The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of I-90, north of Alki and approximately 400 ft. west of Barker Road b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25PJ, Range 45 E.W.M. That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof*recorded in Volume S, page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Ely prolongation of the north line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 ft. east of the NE corner of said Block 9; th. south parallel with the E line of Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N r/w of Alki Avenue; th. W parallel with the N line of said Block 9 to a point which is 319 ft. east of the SW corner of said Block 9; th. N parallel with the E line of said Block 6 a distance of 500 ft. more or less to the N line of said Block 9; th. E along the N line of.said Block 9 to the POB. EXCEPTING THEREFR0M any portion of the above described land alhich lays in Primary State Highway PJo. 2 and except the r/w deeded to Spokane County by the State of Washi ngton as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKi nl ey 1014 N Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 3 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 6 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dvrellings and duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R-I & R-2 j. Glater Source: Consolidated Irrigation District 7#19 k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. t-lethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. ihe State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that:".... In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." . -1- a ' _ _ _ ,~.~,a~.~ .,t, r - . ° ,~.a ~ ~ -T ~ ~i ~ - ~ ~ '~1 J~~~~'~~~~ ~l L~ L ~ E 5 C~~~' T I~(~ T f . p - _ T _ ~ 5 ~KAN~ G~ll~~lTM ~t~A~ L~~Jf) FIL~ ~ ; ~ ,~~~~,CE~ ~J~3C~Jt~~~JT ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ^ . r ; ~ ~a F- ~ r ~ . , ~ . - . p ~ - ~ ~ _ r Ax~P A , ~ , . t ~ ( T 1 _ r !~F i~~t~P~RT"Y ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ! ~~:J d._ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ A - ~ S T ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ A R ~ i~l U R C ~ l;~t. ~l ~a~ r.~ 1 _L _P~,_ L~.I~ I ~U C~h CRS ~`T ~ ~ ~ ' • 3 4 ~4~ R~ a~ 11~2-~-7 3~~ Ai~~ ~.1,J~iC~ ~~,l~~.L ~~~N1~'~ ~.7 ~1 ~t~~~lA ES 1 i,I~~ENACR~S ~+11 9~+~1~ ~8~~~-ic~4? ~6~014~1$~ ~ r~ ~d~K~~v~~r~ C~R~3~r~ ACi~ C~~~ac:RS ~~/z wAS~i 1R ~K ~ ~ 7~~ C~, 1.~~~112 Cf L3 fi~~l C 1~O1Sb ~I ~ _ 1~~54-1~~3 ~'rb~~bBC ~ R~RR~ C~~BIN ~1C~C~ G~RitiAC~S P~ ~4t~ ~~WIN Rl15SE~1 ~ r ~F ~~~-4-~ 8~C ~~fL4 ~?~C S~SF~ ~I~QF~;w~t]FT ~IF l.'~ fV b~~ GRE'~NACR~S R~ ~ _ ,.R NA ~ 5 WA '99~1b v EE C ~ ~ I ~~~5~4-it~~4 44~5~~~ C 4~ ~.AY Cfl~~if~ A~ID G1~fVAC~$ ~T ~..4~' ~~.~FTGN M~ V ~ 1 L3 _ _ _ ~ . C - ~ ~ ~L~i QF l4 1 S T F~~QQF~ ~F ~.~~L-~ E7tG W~~D~F~' , N R A ~ 1 ~ ~ E~ AC E5 ~ ~ ~~s~~~~~~~~~ c~~r~~~~ ~~v~ v~~v ~i~rc c~~~~r~ ~o~ ~a+vn~~s ~~~r - - - vA~ ~~r~~ ~~~~a - , ~ : ~ ~v~ ~ C~~ B1I P~i~ tJF ~I1~VA~. ST L1 ~,A~~ ~3.~~7 S~19~F~ ~~~F ~W~(l E 1~3 : f ~ P 'A 99~1~ C~ L6 ~`H E CA (.N ~AR ~l~~t ~IL i.~6~5~ lad EXT~ ~1~6~~ 3~ 1~ Ak t~~~~(~AG S'~ 4~TT~i1~L t]F ~5-~ ~83.3~~ 1'N 1~ ON ~J~ ~1~NL L 1 ~36F1' ~H S I €~3.3F~ ~UB ~ ~ _ Fw t ,,ti ' - HAR 1~~d~r l~li ~~+~~~~+~1 ~ HCl,L.41~:) Cpf~~IIN ACt~ G~hA~RS f'R7' d~~1LL~IN~3 ~IG D~ 1~ 1 E ~y n ~f{~ ~~I k ~ j A I~E~~' J.~ ~1~ r..~~T~ ~ ~~5+~~~ ~ SI~ !7Tl~U~ aJ~~ ~1~1 ~ 1 ~ lf~~~ ~L i~4. ~ ~ C~ L~ t~5~1 rth S~AR W I~H [~F L6 TG SL ~'H ~Ml~.`Y Ai.G S~, ~~0 ~U~ LUM~AI ~ SLA~~[~ ~I:~ 98~6~ s o~ ~a~ ~ ~a ~c~~ Fxc ~~t - - - T I { 1~554-11~]~~ 4c1~~?lA A~I~~~$~J'V ~~RBIN AQD GRNA~RS P~t'f AN~~~S~N W~ A 1~' ~F B1~ C~J I~L ~F ~3~1 ~63.3FT ~ ~1!WCa~ ~F L6 T~ E ~AR 'WiT~i ~ 1~~L~5 G~1~LEY ~ ~ ~ ~9L ,~Ot~FT 3H ~ PA'~ i~7 WL T~ SLY LN SI~ 8~'H ~IL'~ ALG S~~Y L~ ~f~~.Y GR~~NACR~S kA ~1~ I .11~~ b~~ T~ P~9 E~C SLY 5~T 1~~~w-~I1~ ~,~+t~~T'~~ip~ C b~~~~;~I~~ ~~pR~1~l Ai~~ G~hACR~ RRT ~i~l~~A~~ RI~HA~f~ C ~ T ~ L~ Bil ~I~ ~ ~A~r ~ T~ ~ i~~~ ~~a(~~EST ~F ~~1 '~E~ 3~.3~F~ 5~CbSF E(~ Ni~~t~~ C~F I l. 1' H L Y 41 L~ ~ M~I A D~_ ~ l.6 ~5~fi T~ S P4R 1~IT~f 4~i~ ~F ~.b T[~ Si~ ~~I ~ S ~~i~ LU I r~L ~ 826~' 5 ~ 5~F P'a~ TH ~I T~ ~aB ExG SLY FT ~ ~ SCH~~t SC~t~ I%~ E 1~K5~i C7C~ 5~65~~~ ~L R P~~~LL ~~~~t~i~ A►~~ ~R~lA~RS ~~tT J L Z 1H ~ 175F T PA~ ~~l h~~ TH ~ TU ~IL 11(~ . ~1F 87 ALL L I~~E~ +~T S~~QR 53F~ W ~ ~ ~~l '~H ~ ~C' NwL~~ t~ 5 7~ SW~O~ T~1 ~ R~~~ ~~~~f~A~R~S ~f~R ~9(~~5 fi s~~~ : ~ ~ -t ~T",~ - ~ ' y' •R ~ P~~ AY~C11~ ~DWAR[~ R ~ 1-~~~ G.. ~~1 ~ ~ G~Ot~~I~l Aa~ C ~+IA~C 5 ~ ~ ~ wlY~~~ Q T 5~lF S~C~R ~I T~i PA~ ~ A ~~~,~~q ~ , ~F B7 ~'3~ flF ~,P~V~~ LY E~ ~l T E 1Sbt~~ Llti ~tV~ - ~Il. ~ 17~F~ T~] Ti~~E ~'~B Z~i W~'+4~ fi~ NL 1~'~~T ~N ~ PAR T~ ~L ~~E~r~f~►~R~S W~ '~~~tb ~V~~ 175 ~ F T~1 ~~F ~18 T~ S T~ PC1' ~ 14?~FT PROt~ fVl. ~N ~ AL~ FT T~7 ~ f 1,~~~~~i-~7~.~ ~~~~~~8 M~Y M~'GGS~G C~ C~lR~Ihl A~~ ~R~►t1~ClR5 ~R~ ~AYL~F~ ~~i~A~'~ ~ B~~Y~~ ST~" ~W A~~ ~8~~ 8~ T i~~ ~i~~~~ J~~ ~ 1d6~6 A K AVE ~7F 87 ~II~ OF ~'Th1 UF ~F~ L I 3~~F~ TH T TH ~~5~]F~' ~~1 ~1~r6FT TH W PAR T~ f~1. ~s~ Si4~~ TO ~,~~~NA~R~S WA 99~,~~ ~ ,k ~ 4- 7 ~s ~ 7~i ~ . ' o~~ F= ~~5~ ~AN~ ~F~N 5'~ ~ C 4 ~ C[]~~IN ADD GRNACRS J G ~ ~ ~7~VAC S~P W i~ ~A~.~ ~'~~G ~FT 5 [~F N ~I5 ~~K~R ~7` '~1~~ P'7h~ F,. ~ ~7 35~~~ Ty 1~~FT T~4 ~~~~F~' T~l N14b~T ~RE~NA~RE~ I~~ ~l'~Q1~b ~ ~ L~~~Tk~Wf~~RT~NL ~ ~ ~f Q P ~ ~ r'~ T~~.~~ , ~~Chl~~:~~=« ~;r'~~~I►~ ~?l~ GRhAC~S PR1' ~~i~~AR~~Y JAMES P ~ . : ~ ~ AV~ U~ ~xT r!~ 3~I C~F ~~'3~iFTi ~f hI1~I~~ [7F ~146~~ ~ 13b~13 CU~~~Y t~ ~ I`~ ~ l, rF, L.~ 4~ ~ !`1 ~J 1 ta ~~Y~~'~~~~ 4- C 7~ G 7 6 5 G Z(~~ I L~~~ U G K E R C~ i R~ I N A~ p G~ N A C~ S P f~'~ - ~~f . ~ ~141FT [lF :~~4+~~~' ~~X 3~ - QF ~7 ~II~F~ GF ~~~~FT ~ GR~~NA~GRES W~► ~4~~b a ~ ht~C Fi I L~L I 5~ ~ r - 7 4 9 9~~ C 1~ ~ M~ C ~ D Y ~ C Q R~~ 1~ A~~ t~ R N~ C R' S i~ R~ - 1~~~4 ~ 1~ 2 A C~ 3~~ 3~~} F T F E 1. t~ 7~~~-~~~ S D~ 6~,~ C t~~~ E Y A V~ ~F ~~-9 PTN ~7-~~,UAG ST ~]J ~ PA~ Tfl 67 A~~5~ ~1~ ~7.5F~ TF~ ~ I~R~EiVA C~~S~ 9 9~ I 6 '~R~3fl ~JL ~F ~ TF~ ~ ALG L~ NL - - ~[l I~'I~~T~1~V~Q~CDW'LEYS~THEALG~JLGOWL~YS~ - - PA~ T~3 ~7 ~1 ~7.'~~T ~H N if] PCl~ ~~G aLY 5~T ~ ~ ~ ~iR~ ~~TfiE T ~I 4~~7 1 4'J~7~5D~C V'W P~1~T1 Y C~R~It~ +~[~D G N~~C S 18 5 5 ~ A Y~El~ 3'~~FT ~~F EL~~2 "s~~ 5 OF P~t(3D ~l E 1~5~ ~ G~1~L~~" ~lF ~~~9 ~T~ C~ 87-~~V C ~ ~ ~ ~GR~~NACRES ~IA '~9~1~ w~~,~~~ ~rc ~~u~ Paa w w~~ ~~r~ a~ ~r~ s ~~~t ~ ~ ~ r r~ ~o - ~L B7 T~ NL 0'~ ~a~l~L~Y ST ~'M ~ AL~ I~~. ~F ~~~tL~Y ~T ~ T. i~ ~'RIJ~ PQ~ E~C~ S~FT . I ~ ~ ~ 4~I~~l~AN JQHCV ~ - ~ ~4 t~~?17~; J(~1~,~ ~,CSE~~N ~~IR~IN ~►Da fi0 GR~~~~GR,ES 1 ~5~~+ 1 5 ~ ~ ~ K 1~ ~'~47~ ~f LN ~F S~ ~LI( TH E 1~4~6 A~~~ A~f~ f~~~ ~34 E Gf ~J ~,N OF ~ ~ r _ ~ + 1~l PD~ GH~~NACRES WA 99(~~b N~"AR T~ ~1 Lhl ~Q~ SD ~~+7 T~I C94 ~H 5247 ~h4 w9f " ~I 1 S~~ AN J~ HN R 5b~~1~`C J~W~N i~~SE1~A~1 ~C0~8~N AD~ TC ~G~EE~VAGR~S I85~4-~~915 ~ f l~~lb AL~I A~"~ f 1~ ~ QF 8~~, 11 ~ ~47 ~ C~F ~~kUD N !~H ~L~ il ~`N ~ ~~G 33t~ ~ L ~ a T~# 5~~►~' ~H i~194' TC7 ~REENACRES ~A ~9~I~~ ~ PAR ~~7 l~ Q~ S~ ~LI~ ~47 ~ E1 ~ ~l k ~ ~'CB E~f~ 9 fi h1~,~~ELL ~I~E~# ~ ~~716~8 ~ ~ '~A~t~i~LL ~Of~B1N A~D Tfii ~~~~NAG~~S 1 ~~~4-~!~J 1~ TF! U~~ ~~C H4~Y ~ ~ 4521 ~ACK1~~f~1. +~V~ ~T 1. BLlC E~~ TH ~ 1~~ 19FT ~ E r SPOKA~IE WA 9~~16 ~NACF~S P"~T 5P0 P~TG 18~54--0~~°~ 77~O~bT2~~ ~G!~~DCIY ~~R~iFiA~l~~ C~~~IN A~D ~ i12179 Cfv PR~O~ Nl [J~ ~11 524FT E ~D~ W~~►~~7Ffi ~i~ ~1 ~v~ wc~,d Q~ ~ 9~ 11 G H 8F~ ~fiH ~ P~4R ~f~ ~iL i~F B11 T[~ S~ QF P~~l~ ~~I'~ ~IITI~ ~LY ~7 B P#tQ~ TH ~L~ SL~pR~p SL ~24~T ~~F Wl. TH iV ~'f~ ~{~B' ~X+G f~N QF 11 SL1' S~fi _ _ ` -R ~ ~ ~~iT ~~~~lG ~'~AR~. ~ -09 ~ ~~~7~,3 KR~~T~~1 G~1R~~f~ A~U ~ N ~ S . i ~ 5'~# 4~ ~ 8~ ~ A~KI AU~ PRt~CI ~L ~T 4~~FT N~F NWC~.7~t ~~F L 1 H7 Tr# ~~AR T~1 WL E 1 ~ ~F ~9 B~G ~I~ ~ T PT ~Z4~~ f~ ~i~. [l~ ~~R~~N~~RES -~I9~31l5 a~ ~t ~2~~fi r~ ~ s~ r~~ s ~ ~ ~ T~ N PA4~ T~ V~l. 81~. ~~7~T NL ~F 7 ~ ~ _ - ~ON~ R~A~~, ~i - 4 6~{}~r~8 ~I HAT~H ~OR~3~1~ A0~ ~R~ACR~ PRT 1'~554-~09~ 1 9 F1° 1~ DF h~WC~R aF L1 t~T ~H S~~T~T ~ 1~4~+~ AL~I AV~ ~F ~~~G Ch AR~~ NL ~F 8~ 3~ GR~~1~~4+~RE5 ~A '~~Q1~ ~ 1~~~~1' ~f~~T~T ~B~~T P[~~ - _ - - , _ PR T A 1~'~~ I~~. ~ 4i E D'~ ~ C K~1 ~ A~~ RNA RS ~ b~b~~'~r5~ dl.~~~l~t~ h~ ~UNE C~R~I G G 1~~~~ ~ ~ ~ T~i 55~~~T E194f~ ~I~Q~FT ~11'~4~~ TU E l~~+~7 AL~(~ AV~ t~~G A~ I~EC~~ B 1 99 ~~~~NAC~ E"~ ~I ~i6 ~ , ~ BAN~SHA~ES ~TG ld~►~1~3'~Z7'3 Sli~Ah~ J 4~~Rt~S C0~8Ii~ AQ~ T~ G~E~NA~~E5 1~~54~~411 ~ ` J ' T 0~ ~i31~FT QF L~` i~Li~ 1~~~~I3 ~ ~ ~1Z~F 1 o°f ~ w c~,~„~ L„ R A f~ ~T +~1LLIA~M M~R~Lfl L 1g HAR~L~7 Gi~L~AM C~3~~IN A~q ~~d C S P ~,~554-~71~ '~3~2'~ ~9 P~G C~i i~R~O ~i~. ~I~ B7~.~9~~~ ~ ~~Z7F~` 5 ~di~~~R ~F ~.I ~7 E [85~9 C~I~L~Y ST B7 ~ ~ ~.i ~n~~ a~ s~ r~ ~►+~v ~i ~~~~r~a~~~s ~A ~~a~~ , TH 5 ON LN PA~ ~1 W~ ~ U ~IT~I Sl~' L~ ~F ~1~ ~R~~ TN '~LY Al~ ~LY LN ~F ~7' RRGi~ T _ ~ b~OC FT ~ ~F W! ~1T Thi I~ PA~ T[~ ~bt~~~T ~ ~f ~'L T~ ~'T - B 1 l t~ T W OF ~[ll3 ~H ~ T~ ~(~~3 51Y 5FT . 1 P~~ - G~LLi NS ~iE~~~! ~I~S _ HEL~N L ~~~.L~~15 ~~~B~N ~0~ C~AA~R~ 1~1,~ Cb~~ 5~~~~6~ ~fF 8~ 9 F3 i~3~~FT Ca~ ~1~~~T N T~US ~Af~K~~ ~ ~ ~.7 ~REENA~~t~S i~A 9'4t~~~ . ARRE~V A _ , r~F ~~1~8IN A~'~ C~~N4C~5 P1` N~~~HA~E~ 4~ ~ i, 1~►~~ ~Fh ~l M1~H~I~L L!~~ _ 4 ~~SC~ T7~71 _ ~ C~~ 1_7~~~ r~~~ ~75~T t'F ~~50~T ~lf ~1~~V2~Ffi ~F ~~~~f~T i~~ ~1 aZ3 ~+4#~~F~ ~f~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ' ~~~a~4-~]6Q~r b265~4C ~~'I~T 'W f~~4.a;~S ~.~~?~'~I~`~ A~~ isRhACR~ ~1'~e} SE~A i5T MaT - _ - - - ll~i~~ N~ ~ ~k~ ~d Ffi ~l~ E1~~pFT L~ c~ ~ ~ ~ 18~~4-~bCt~ 5~7~b~~ ~ I~ ~1A~'~EL~. C~~tB1~V A~0 ~~'~El1ACR~5 A~ NAT QF I~~SN , , - . ~~s ~ ~r~~u ~ ~ ~~~r 2arT r~~ ~rs ~ r~~~~ ~ ~~~c ~ a~.s~ ~~~fi v ~9~~~~~~~~ ~~°p ~I 0~ ~ ACJ ALl LY+~ 5~Y [JF ~S~# ~ ~ ~ - AL~~K ~aNU~G~LI ~ G~R~IN A'~0 Tt~ GR~ENA~f~~S ~UN~1CC~1~~ 1 AL ~L~ ~a~ ao~r~o ~~~u n~ ~~~cs ~ ~ ~ t~c v~c sr ~~r sa ~r~ ~L~ u~ ~~~r ~v~~Tr r~ v~~~ c~~ ~ ~~w ~ ir~~ r~~ ~~t~~t~w~~r nv~ ~ ~ ~u~ s~ e~~~~ ~~~K~►r~~ wa ~~~o~, ~ I 1NPUT ~AROS PRQG~S~ED; NQ C~RR~S~'U~i~ING PA~C~i~I S1 F~l~a~lt~ ~~1 ~I LE ~ ~ ~ c~'Ih'+~ + ~ ~ D~I~ ~ ~ • ~ ~IWIAft~" r1~A• ~N~Ufi ~;A~tI~S PARLELS Ri~IN1 ~I~dE$ ~ ~ ~ll ~ ~ 3~ I ~ b I - - _p y ~tt~ ~ - _ U~.~+ G I~f C~e~ ~,Y ~h ~4 ~ ~ thv'~+ ~~v ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ( ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ D ~li ~ ~t , !b ~ ( 8 ~(~7 ~ ~ ~ S ~v~c x ~ VJ 5 v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - t~~~r.~e.~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~n ~ r~ ~r ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ _ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ - 1~;5~~- ~ ~8~~3 I ~5 ~ ~ C - ~ , ~ ~ ~r~.~ I~v ~4 6 ~ 3 ~i4~~ ~ k W N ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 8'# I +~w~.c~ ~ ~ ~ 7~ - 3~~ ~ f ~ „ , ~ c. ~ ~,.xw ~ C v~r ~ . ~x~~ ~ ~ ~ +C.ta~ ~k ~ , ~ ~d ~k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n [ I r ~ S ~ ~ _ t ~ 14~~1 ~c. w i ~ ~ b t ~-1 ~ t ~ k ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~ ~5 ~S 8 4t~ ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ l~0 3~ ~tt-~- ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ , S'. r ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ _ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ 4 ~ I ~y _ _ . i~ f, r' ~ ~ ,~h~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~Uv~ f. ~ ~ ~ + ~ 'G'~✓~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 1~4 ~ ~~I v~ - . a ~~l . cc ° ' ~ ~ I ~ '~~uv~.~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~3`~ 4 - - ~ '~D ~~r a , - r , ~ ~ N ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ 3 ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~v~ ..r~~;r~r~ ~ ~~~rh~ ~ ~~f~~~ ~,~+~r~~~~ ~ ~ k ~W~~~~S NQ '~IF'I~ ` ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~ 9~ ~Y ; l~+ , , . ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~il b . , ~ ~ a~~ _ _ C ! t.►~~ , R i► , -c . ~ ^ ~ ~ _ _ ~ _ - - _ _ ~ _ - ~ . : ° .y~ i~,~ t ' _ ~ ~ " t~C:1~ ~ , ~ ea r ~ ~ * 6 ~ :~}~,~i*~ ~ f ~ j_~~ 3 ~It„~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' uy i ~ lT '~r ~ ~ " S ~ a~f~ ~tiq 1 ~'I ~`r t~~ ~ . y ~ ' f d 1~` ~1~ ~ ~ z ~ , :s 11,, '~r ' r' ..'a~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~+~,r ?~~r. _ ~'1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' y ` ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ . ~ , , L' • ~ ~ ,~i ~ l Z . 4 "'~f Y 7 . ; . ~ ~ ' r ~ '~.J`.,L. ~ . , . . ,Y j ; o~I ~ ~ 1 '~y{ G ~ ~ w ,,,`,f• ~ ~ ~1 ~ 1 ~ I ~U ~I ~ _ . - ~ ~,,t ~ L 9~ R ~1 ~ ~ .14t . .F ~ 4~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ .~`'d7~A1~JJa,~.~ '~r+S'~ 1° " F•'aw ' W ~ 1~~ 1 ` ~ 7w ~ ~ . ~ , o ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 4~ , P' 1?+ I , y ~ ~ ~ ~ t ? c'f ~i ~ ~ , ~1 , ~ . 1''~ r r , , ~ r ~ ~s ~ , ~ ~ ~ 1~~ ~ ~ f~ ` , 1 1 CJ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ s r ! < 1j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ Y ~ ~'"r ` r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4` ~ ~ ~ t • ~ x~ ~ a ~ ~a ~j 4 ~ 4~ ~ ~ -'r~ ~ir~ ~ ~ ~Y"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ sI' ` ~ ' ~ ~ ~ Y 4 ~ " ~ _ = 3~,~~ y ~rt►~'~,a~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ' ~ ~ _ ~ ~ y,~1~ v~ `1 " ~ i ~ • ~ ~ r ~ . .w.~ . * ~ . - ~ ~ R f ~ _ .~a~:' r~,b„h.~~~ .~J~' ~ r~i ~ l I y ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ "?d ~i 3 rI4~~,~Ma '.R! ~i j ~tl {„[1# ~y,1 ~ ".,~d ~ - ~ , ~ ~ r.~ ~ ° ~~,t,~~-~ ~1 ~ ti r~ i . , .~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - { ~ " ~ ~ ~_I: ~ ~ L+ r~,~ ~ ~~i ~ - - f i~f . ~e~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' S ► Q i i •r ~ - _ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ . . _ - _ _ _ - - _ ~ ° ~,1 ~if] `e'.~.r~ rt ~3 ~ - - ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ` _ e , _ ~ ~ - r ~ ~ D ~ ' ~i ~ ~h ~ Z ~ A ~ ~ 5 '6I ~d l L3 g ~ ~ ~ ~r'i ~ ~~'b''~, b~N~~c~'~' <<: ~ ~ ~ _ ~ '[~'G~',~' =~j ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ P~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ( ~ ~ 5 - ,a~~,~ ~ , ,a` - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ ~~x' ~ ~ 3 ~ 1 c~. , ~ ~ ~ +6 r I ~ M ~ I ~ z ~ d ~ ~1 +i~,r` ~7 , . ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ E 1 ~ ' ? ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . 3d - a _ !I ~ r Q ~~t~ ~ w ~ ! ~ ~ . - - , ~ ~ ` v?~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ r~ f ti ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ , ,u, ~~.,~.1 ` c31 ~ ~ ~ ~,~r~` G'" ~ ~3 ~ ~ s~ ~ b( ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ " k I"~= : ~r x ~ ~~~~,p, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Y ~ ~ .~f ~ s 1 ~ 1 ' ~ ~ t° , ~ ,s °i~ ~ ~ 1 f~ ~1 d ~"~'e 1,1; ~N _ ~J ~•~fi - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~P ~ ~`e ~1 ~ tr - H• , _ p, . ~ ~ N , . ~ ~ ' ~~a~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ . I ' ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~i '~!1' E z , ~ . ~ r r~ at ~,I. ~ ~-~a-di+- r ,O~O~Y~ '2'~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i. ~~~Ob~6' 'E7; °ssttiO~ h ^ ~ ' o- _ ~ 'a7. _ _ q ~ C c~5 - ~ ~ ,rs+t~N~~,~-~~" ~n~r~~~ ~v►v~~a~axs - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k _ _ _ ~ ~ s ed cev~r~ ~ ~ p~ ~ - ~ - _ - ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~T o + V ~ ~ ~ . • I {~r~k~~d ~.~a,~~ ~5~ ~t~a ~~~n~3~ ~I~~rl~vv~~ c~~i ~,Sy', , } ~ ~ ~ ~...»t '3 ~ `0 p , ~ ~ g + ~ a ry ~ r ~ , f ' •iiM_ ~ ~.s I I~ ~k ~ ~ ` ~ i~ ir M y ~ ~ ~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ + t } ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ti ~ ,3~j I ~ ~ • ~5~• * ~ ~ aM '4~ ` , ~ ~ : 4~ ,r , ~1 i f~ ~ ~ • + ~ ` 'y a'. ~ ~ I fi f_~ E ~s~ ~ ; ; , 7, . I . - • . `i . . , ~ ~ ~ . . _ ~ . . . M. * • ? , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R t ! . x ~ _ , ~ , , ~ . : , ' » _ , " ' _ . y ~ ' ~ • . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . . ~ ..q i.~ - ~ ~ ` ~ r ~ . - ~ ~ ~ . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ . • i f ~ • , ~ n Y s ~ . ' s . ~ . . . . . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ' . ~ } [~~+~y/f ~7! . ~r ~"e' !"t ~ . . ~rr~+ } p ~ ~ _e~ ~ ~+ri1~ ..1 . .4 . . . . ~ _ ~ . . . i 5 , . e . . . ~ . . , - ~ R ~ ~ . . ~ . . ~ y ` _ ' S ~ r. _P- - . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ , ~y . ~ . . ._.4. , ~ _ _ ~ ~ , s• ~ a ~r e-, .r ~ u, ~ ~ 6 S+ 4 ~ ` . _ Ci c~~ pa a~'r a~~~++~ n~ ~ ~ , - ~ k.~' ~ii" ° ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~'~l ~ ° ~ t.~ ~ ~,y . t ► ~-t ~,k. a e ~1 J~~i(~'1~ k1: ~ ►!I+~ Sd ~~:i ! "''~~S ~ ~ I ~ 23~~ ~ ~.L ~ua ~ `',,.,7 ( I~ ~ • 'ti.l ; ' ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~~1 . 'w ~ ~ ~ ' lA~ ~ i ~I ~ . o i~ ~~r ';r' ~ ~ 1 ~ - ~ f~ ~ '"s ~ d .,4~. , ~ ' ' ~ : r~`'11 pN ! ~ .r `-r",~ ,P~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ' : " `.°f ..s`' • i : ~ ~x ~~~,1~1 ~~i J 1~ A + R~'~~ ~W _ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7~ P Ci + ~ ~ ~'GI ~ ` Y~ ' ~ f ~ l~ ~f y p ~1 ` ~ 1 ~h • j ~1~~ ~ . M ~ } ~ 'y~ 7 ~ J ~ q F\ '1 4 - ~~`y ~ , ~ ~*C.~~~~47 ~y ,~C ^I~L~ ~iN ~ +,'i Lf I a ~ ~ 4 ~ + a ~ - ~ ~,`j~n 4 ~'r~~ x'. ~ ~ I ~ . ~ R ' . ~ ~,1'1{~/ . . . ~ . ' . • ~ ~I.'D~b~ a'W.~_ '~4rt~~ ~ - - - _ ~ ~'~r ~^v~+'~r~1b►C~rv - nrcal~r,~ ~-►#,ng , - - - - - - o~,► ~ . ~ z i . . - - ,a _ _ - _ _ _ ' - - ~ _ , ~ , w - . ~ , ' ~ ~i = _ .r ~ • ~ , 3 ~ - ~ 43 ~3 ! 01~1 ~ ~ ~h~009' ~ ~ ~',~'~.,'~t~ : ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ q o~ u ~ ~ ~ w 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s r~~ r~ zI ~ ' - ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ X ~ .f ' ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ _ ; r ~ ~a y~ ti1 Ei ~r I~ ~ k! I j • ~ a~ ~ ~ t~ ~x S ~L; ~ ~ i ~ ~ ' - - i . ~ ^ ~ ~~*y ~ , ~ •7 ~ I ~ ~ N A~ f I' ~ 3"~•~ 1 ~ # ~ n ~ ~ ,y ~ yP ~ + ~ ~ ~ is y~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ & ~r~ ~ • ; ~ ' : + a~~ ~r~ ~ n~h , ~ ' r+ : . +M . R r~~ M• ` ~ ^ ~ ,4~ I ' ~ " i ' F ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ' . . ~ i ~ , ~ ; l ~ . ' _ ~ j ~ . ~r r i - ~ TI I 1~ ~ ~ ~ ' ''',f a I ~ ~ ~ ! ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ rsr f~' ~r' , ~ `1 ~M4 ~G''r~' ` ~ "a ~ ~ y ~ I F , ~ ~r 1 ~ ~ - - - _ , • - ~ w' e ~ ~ ~y , R~ • , h. ~ T ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b~ ~ C x ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r i~ ~ r ~ '~~I; S~ 1 ~ . ~ a . ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 4 L" ~ r~J ~`I r ~Q''~/,+"F ~ ~ ~ ~ tr , ~ ~ ,.at~ I ` - ~ ; I~~'G' ~~7 ~ f~ ~ ~ , ~ - - - t~ - • i Q-- " - - . ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ a'~ ` ¢+~~i t i9''b' , o~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ I a ~ ~ ~ ~ I S' S l ~ i ~ ~r• 0#~ '3f~~ ~ ~ R . . rr ~ • ~ : y ~..y ~ ; ; . ~y~ ~ . w~y ~ •'+R ~ ; ~~i • .r~ ~ , . J .i~ . , • ~ 4 . .riF~ . s~~ ~i F ~ • :,'r .Y~ ~ : s~ 6,.aI..• 4... ~ i.a + , i .5.: ~ + j e ~ . r ..1~~ e «~R . w "tiw 'w.~~ i eset{ ~~i r.a'i t~ t~r~+'+ 't..~ a~ ~4.k ij~• i .ewr`i~.+* ~s'r 4a~ .~ei.. ~f M ♦ ~,+~~~.~I~~~ f~li'~u~~~~____ i r~ . ~r y r _ i' ~ + ~ . ' ~ ` +,~~f ~ { ; . ~ 4~ ~Rl~~~~~ { ~~~~~~IY~~~~ ~1~~'~•~ ' ...L~''I►~ ~'t ~ ~C~ ~a ~ ~ ~ b"~► C~, ~~Y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' ~ O CE OF COUNTY EN ~ EER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON Inter-offite Communicotion TQ PLANNING DEPARTMENT f rom GARY KENNALY ~ PLANN ING & TRAFF IC D N IS ION ENG INEER Su6ject ArOAD CONDITIONS * FOR ----PLAT PIP 13.3~ MQLX\A1 . ~ ~.a ' --is-=.~J 5 *CONDIT IONS CIRCIXQ APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONS IDERAT ION ' - - - UBLI'+ RU STAN - - PRIYATE ROAD STANDARD3 - - - &that coaditional aPProvaY o~' theA P~l t ie given eubject to dedicatioa of ~ht of Way and approvel of the road eyetem in the plat by the County Engiaeer; ff"2that plane, proYilee, and croee sectiona ehoWing propoeed atreet centerline and curb grados b• submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; & that drainsge plane and design calculatione ehoWi.ng the gradee aad alignment of dr4inage facilitiee be eubmitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the f il inQ of a f iaal plat; ~ &construction uithin the progoeed public etreete and eseemente shell be performed wmdmr the direct eupervieion of a liceneed land eurveqor, who ehall be reeponeible for perpetuating all evidence of ths location of eurvey monwnente which may be dieturbed during conetruatioa and who ehsll turniah the Couaty Engineer With !'Ae Bu.ilt" p1Qne and a certificat,e in vriting that all improvemente Were inet411ed to tb,e linee and gradee ehowa on the approved conetruction plane and thQt all dieturbed moaumenta heve beea reglaced; . Q-no construction work ie Lo be performed within the Public Right of Way until a permit hae been ieewsd by the County Engiaeer. All Work ie eubject to inapection Qnd approval by ths County Engin,eer; ODall construction within Lhe Public Right of Way ie to be completed prior to Yiling the final plat or a bond in the amount e8timated by the County Engineer to cover the coat of constructio of improvemente, construction certification, "Ae Built" plan8, aad monunzenting the etreet centerlinee ehall be filed with the County Engineaer; E 7-no direot acceae from lota to 1/2 Right of Waye until such roada are conetructed to County Standarde and eetabliehed ae County Aoade; E 8-no direct acaeee from lote to Stub Road con.nectione until euch roada are conetructed Lo County Staadarde and eetabliehed ae County Roede; E 9-road deeign, conetruction, anci drainage control for 1/2 Righte of Waye and Stub Road aon- nsctione are the responsibility of the Developer; E10-that the aponeor ehall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a de8lgn propoeal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the propoeed State HighWay-County Rroad interaection. State Highwsy Department approval of the proposed deeign muet be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the reeponeibility of the Sponeor end may either be constructed or a bond to cover the coet of euch improvemeate furaiehed to the County Engineer ia the amount ae determiaed by the County Engineer and the State Hi hway Degartment. (El]~-that a roade Within the plat be curbed and/se paved to the apecificationa of the Couuty Engineer. Exieting County roada providing direct acceea to lots of the plet ehall be paved and/AW curbed to the atandards of the County Engineer. E12-Propoeed private road(e) aerving lote with: no exteneion poesible; ~exteneion to eerve 8 or leee lote; future public Right ot Way Lract. E13-that private road (s) be improved to atandard adopted by the Board of County CoQamfeeionere. $~no direct acceee from lote to JRro A014vAr gvcsey"'' 4D.dedicatioa of additional Right of Way along 4Z&i Ov-drAv4r C (§~that the owner, hie granteee and aeeigne agree to participate in and not oppoee or proteat aA RID AN o~ C'.9 p 4 1-b Uc c 0-1-16 t4 s.~ adU;tl o uA C. 2j9 h 7' e~ w.4 y a/o.v9 $roqa~iv,q y AqE Al Lt E q S ck 4~ t c'TG 4 v N avho u Kfi ah d Cl +c m-e rl S i oAl S e~. y ES-~ab~;~~,Ed tf►;s, WAY w~ be b 'c~G.~ Co ~,~cZ'~ & .~c~ ~AJe e r sL4_1, c~ ais o 2 Q ~ li e 1.1.. • • » ' ' '.1'I~~. ~j , I F ' ~ VI ~ ~ ♦ , _ , . IFIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 r r`+ y . ` yt, 1 ~ S f. 5P01/ANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE September 13, 1979 T4: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS SCHEDULED FOR HEARING SEPTEMBER 27 AND 285 1979 PE-1325-79, PE-1326-79, PE-1328-79, PN-1329-792 PE-1330-79, PS-1331-79, PS-1332-79, PE-1333-79, PE-1334-79, PE-1335-79, PE-1336-79, PE-1337-79. require the following: Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required prior to any construction. . LD/kmj R ECEI VEiD SEp 14 1979 P~ SPpKqNE CDUNTY NNING DEPqRTME NT ~ . FIIe 70 ',t A , ~;~i ~ , 5@C. ~8 T'shlp u,9e467 4t> ~ ,`7"z,,'~ice ~~i~► .~~...-`~-j~_,. Classific'ation Proponent • : - S STAF REVIEW OF 1VMNMENTAL .K _(',KL?ST I. In accordance with the SPokane County Environmental O:~dinance 'arid WAC 197-10, an Environmental Chacklist has boen submitted by the applicnnt vr hii aqent. This checkli9 and any a i.Wnal ertinen s a XVftlyjeereewed I by the The foilowing data brLefly des a ths pro7Preliminary A. Action (s) Requested: one Chanqe; Plat Approval: Final Plat Appcoval; Chanqe of Condition Other: . , A . Description of Prnposal: _~dj;ti S<<~ t~~~ I~~„~ ~ I'1 B ~ , . Czv , A CLOP lexiu C. Location of Proposat: P • ~ S~~Q ~ U. Review of Checkiist:, A. Sliqht adverse impacLs are noted under the followinq questions: 1) Eacth ~ ( (8) Land U9e (15) Enerqy ~ + (2) ALc (9) Natural (16) ~tllties Rasources (3) ~Water (IO) Etisk of (17) Human ~ ~ pset Health (4) rFloca (ll) _ opulation (18) AeschEtics (Sj ~una - (12) Vlf ou9lnq (19) Rec. (6) 10Noise (13) 6Trans./ (20) Arch./ 'rc, Hist. (7) Liqht & (14) Jt4ublic (21) Other Glare Services B. Potentially 9lqnific3nt advecsn impr►cts are noted under the followinq ques t2ons : r Revised bi 1; l9 C. Discussion of impacts identified abave: III. Conclusions and Recocnmendations: Based on th review of the environmental checklist, tae staff: A. Conc3udes that there are no potentiaUy s±qnificant advecse impacts and recommends/is sues a proposed declaration of nonsiqnificance. B, CoRCludes that there are no poten[1aLly siqnificant advecse impacts and, because of Lhe nature of the proposal, recommands/issves a final declaration of nonsiqnificance . C. Concludes that potentially siqnificnnt adverse impacts do exist and recomiaends/fssues a declaration of siqnificanc . IV. Staff inember(s) reviewing checklist s . . ~ ~ , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9flOAOWAY CENTRE dU1LGING N 721 IEF f E R5l)N S ikE t: T i 1 + PHONE 456-2205 5PpKANE WASHINGTt>N 99[60 : 1• A . l <.J V h 1 i . , r i; Gf 1 iS( CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDl1M TO: 1. OOE 6. School Distri ct - (Reg . Off L s; 2, Spo. Co. Heaith Dist. 7, Department ff Came (Environmental Nealth) (Reg. Off) 3. DSHS . ~ . .t . . (Reg. Off q, Fire District ~ 5, Water District # 10. HUD - - (Reg. Off) . _ ; , . ; , . _-L}_.artment orth 721 Jefferson ;)okane, WA 99260 ;J09) 456-2205 Attention : wa11 i s D. Nubbard R E FER E N C E: l ead Agency Desf gnation , Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached . Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACT I NG AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the foliowing project: 4wtx- A +V Ige! ..~t{e C.,,r r ~3 Kr_ 41--t- i This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. I nformation on fiie concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCI/ WITN JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040) (4) or an AGENCY WITN EXF'ERT ISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your optioi-i to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on September 12, 1979 . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for September 27, 1979 . The subject proposal or action (15, IS NU-i ) LUCA-T ED WI THIN -l HE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER ANO AQUtFER ENVIR4N- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY '208` STUDY . Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impaci Statement ( E IS ) or a Ground Water impact Evaluatiori ( GWI E) should be prepared. E rIclosures i•;~ I.' ° _r • , ~ j , I J. N . 1395 R . , • -x°►~ N:Z1'~ f -n~'~5►"~''a R ECEIVED •t t . Jtr _ U~_ 10 Q--~ c'IV sR01~MENTA1, CHfit1~ I ST ~ . SPOKANE COU(VTY Pl.A.NNIM, DEPARTMFNi IntrCducttor; T?+e State envtmrnnentnl 7vl±C-/ ACt of 1911. :haoter 43.ZIC. 10d. ~uires ill sLate and locai govefrnffencat agenc:es to wnslder oavironmental vaiues toth for :l1eir flwn actions and wnen licensinq privats aropesais. 'he ;ct requiras *.hat an Envtronmental :mpat: Statament be ;reoared for 311 :najor ac*.~ons sicn~tican'ly ~and "leversety'. as ~er WAC 197-10) dtfeCt:nq :ne Quaiiry af the phYsltal envfrnnmnt. "he aur;ese .f :^is :neck;lst 's :o ^.7ev :*e icenc-25 1- •roiveG cfetarmine wnetrer or not a proposal is sucn a n+ajar acttcn. P?aase answer che follaring ?uestlons as canvleuly as you can «ttn :r,e tr.r~r,at,on aresen.ll ivasl3ole :o :ou. ?'ease 3rs«er ~ues.tons a5 'yes" or "mayce' ff, in yCUr oo1nicn. ev_n onTy siicnt irnaac:a wiil r+:suic. 7he reviawers o* tne _netklfst ril' be aware of ind cancern t"emselves 41th *.he Zeare! of 1rr,oac:, asfcing yau far Tore infonratian, 'f necessary. Ahere explanati:r; og lour snswen are requt rri, cr ,+here you ~elieve 3n exo i ana ti an wouT o be htt ofu 1 to qo•ferr►rtwt aetis ion-maKers nc i uce ;:ur exol3nation in Lhe SCace provided. or use 3adi!tonaT zaces, if necessarv. You snouid tncl-jds references ~o iny ?-epQr"S ir i.UC1E5 af wA1Cl1 y0U 3t! :wert it14 wttiC}1 3r! -el!vdflt LO C:1Q answen you p►'Ov1Ct. :Jrt10t@Le 3RSNQP"S LO Ll~tS! ]ulS:1mnS '1QM +z ~ neio ait agencfes fnvaived rlth fCw' ;ropvsal *_o unQerL3ice :re ~eauire4 environffental r!vfea mi*_nout unnecESSari ~Islay. "`+e foitoMing -zuestlorts iaoiy ta lour totai preoosal. nnt ±ust :a cne 'icanse for anicm you are curren:ly aVal;vinq or V!ie flm- 3osal far whtcn aopraval rs sougnt. YQUr answert sROUiC r-tClude :he -caoacts ++hic!► will ?e taused 5y ;aur :iroov5ai .nen i- 1s connle*_rd. ev" cnouqn ccmelettan may not cecur unti1 sometirtm 1n t!e 'utur•_. "his w111 aIlar al' -re .n!_^ v1" ]e 1nvOlve4 :0 cOmplete tne1r artvirOrnmntil r!view nar. -aitiOU[ du011catlnq oa0lnrork in uie fULllr°_ • '1c appltcation snall De :rocassM untii LRe .neckiist nas peen comvletea ana returned to tRe aoorQCr-,_e :afler~.-er;. S tate law reaut riexo i anatf ons for ±very "ves" and "qvoe" 3nSU+lI' on _ne cReck :4st. ~ he perian como i e::ng :ne 4ar~+ ray oe r!auired ta qrovide axAianatlans ror no ansti+ers, and in sort+e cast3, more aecailea lnfor~*.ation to aid in 3:nr!sttOld QlterTnlnatton. 14M : This is a staneard form beinQ used oy all stita and iac.al aqenctes in the State ot 4ashinq±on !or vartous .yoss af propasais. many sf Lhe 7uestians may not aoD1y to four proCOSaI. If a auestion aoes not appTy, just insHer tt "no" and tont'.nue zn :a :.e next auestion. :"`1VIRONKJ1tAL C:iECKL:ST FORM . BfttKGR0UTt0 .4ame of arooonenc: Transwestern !?eal ty phone Nuftlr 922-07041- N. 1014 Pi nes Rd. Spokane, !,lash. 99216 Z. address of Prooonent: 3. OdCQ ChlCkliSC Si:aiait:ee: 4. aqency qecuiring i.hecxtist: LQLlC1tY viannlng 5. Vacx of ?ropasal, t! 4opiicaole: 5. 4ature an(i 3rief Oescristfen a} :ne 4roposal ~inciuotnq zut riot limitea co 1ts stze. 7ener31 les;qn tiemenc5. enn otner factars :hat wi i' give an ucurata understanoinq af i*_s stooe ana nawre): Llpt nlat on about 3 acres. 7. _JCaLIGA Of PropOShc ClSCfite ne OnYsical set*.ing 3f L11Q PrOdCSai. lS wl11 3S _!1! ext2nt Jt LhQ idn0 3rC'! 3f`2C:t'9 ]y any envirorooenw 1 smoar.s, 'ncluding 3ny other infor+mtfon nte^_ea to ,sve an acc-.ir3te inetrsLanding oi the envtr,~n- -entai set:trq ot the ;roposai}: 400 feet East of Barker Road on A1ki Avenue. a. Estimated ',ate for letian of :!se Proocsal: I year 9. .ist af all asnniLS. Lictnses ar soven+wt Ao0row is ;aqufrea jor :he Prooosal (Reaerai. state ana 'ocal - inc'ueing remnes): Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee acceptance of nre-l imi :sa.rv n' 4, ;floard of County Commissioners acceptance of tinai plat. (IF SPACc FflR c:cDLAnAt:ON iS IVAOEOUATE. Ft.,::ASE aT':.CH aOQt?iONAI PAGtS. ) :0a. D0 yOu, Or *.}1le OrMEf in th! QvMt yOU d0 mOt Own LhQ SUbjeCt 11mG. `t3ve dny 01an5 fOr fuLUf`e idCittOf1S. 2xpenSiQn, Or furti+er aC:tvtty reiatb !o or connac:aQ rith thfs proaosal° :t yes. azpiain: ilo . 10b. ?o you a+n or have oDtZans an land nearby or adjacent to :his aroaesai's 'ocatfon' res. ecptaqn: PJo . , ?1. 7o you know of any plans by atliers inctudtng :he amsr anizn rtay atfect the oreoerty caversd 5y your ;roposal 3r land iajacQnt or nesroy? ~f yes. 'XD13in: N0 . 12. AL`.dC11 iny otner ipQlfLIIC1CR !'oP!p :hdt nd5 C!!!1 Coim1QLQ7 -*g3rding :hl! :1'ODCSdl; `f 'f0nt n35 :e+sn Co11D1lC24. ?UC 15 ezpected :o oe fi ieC at some future eate. zesc^i:e --he r,atur• of suci ip01 iCdt:Qtt "orn: I/A :I. cNY;ROHMEK':a. :~4PAC?S ;_xDlanat~ons af :I1 'yes'' Ind '~nay0e" answers ar! *eauirea; '_s ldavoe `~o _3r!t1. W111 :h• ;lroWSai result in: a` ~nsaole parth :onditians or :n :nan,as 'n geoioqtc str,~c::~res? . . . • • . • • • X Oi3ruCt'ons. CtSp1dCeR1lnL5, z=at:ian zr cvertaver+ng of :te :oi-' , . . . . . . ~ - . :.hange ;n :acograohy or grounC surfate reifti `ea*_sres' . . . . . . . . . . . X - .,;1 %+e :estruC"on, :aver4ng or raatf=ution of any }n:oue ;eolvgtc X 3r anySical teat4res: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a) :+ny inc'pa5t `•n *;nG or raCer irnSion •7f 4o115. 81:htr in ir :h8 31:e' . . . . . l .IM.,.UJMi~•7 f" • n ~,a ~ lr 1P/1C. t',,J!S -AP '-..:,P;al tVy .S L , ~ . r-hanges in leposi;fon or erls. ~eac~ sands. 3r :manQes -n 5i1'.3['on . + Jepositfan or er,sion wnicn z adiiv the :rannei of a river ir gtT!3m or :na Nd of ne ocean ar ;nv :3y, 4nlet or iaka? . . . . . . . . . . . . X :cptanat,on: Construction of new homes and roads will overcover soil. Slight modifications in existinq topography may occur, tt is iikely that durina construction, a small amount of erosion will occur. Z. Air. 4111 C11e ]raposbl rtsul . '.n: !~s "'IIvte "iC aj Atr etnissions ar deterloration of smoient air auality? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Tht crtatlon of obfectianaolt odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('c) A1terat;an of air TOV@AtM L, mot, wre or temoerature, or 3ny chang• in x climata. eitner ixally or regicnaily7 . . . . . . . . . . . . =_x lar.at;~~: During and after construction, motorized vehicles wilT-be on and - aDout The property. aacer. 4i11 :.ne arapQSal resuit tn: Yes "'ayoe '+v ;a? Change in c:irrents, or the caurse or direc:lon of wa cer mavemnts. X jn either rtsarine ar frtsn watEr52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'b) Changes rn 3DSOrCttqn rates. arainaqa aatten , or :.he rate ind amcunt of surfacr aater runorf? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ;c) Aiterations :o uhe course or flow of ~lood r+atsrsl . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X ;d) Cnange in tne 3aount of surf:te water in any watar tooy? . . . . . . . . . . . i_e} Cischarge znto surf3ce watef, or tn iny ilteration of surface water auality, includinq but not 11m1ted to tlmOeraLVre. GissolveE X oxygen or turoidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (j; Alterdtian of ttie Clrection or rate of fiar of grourtd watert? _ T ;g) Change tn tt~o -judntlty of y0und wattrs, aigner througn itrett 3dditions or wicharawais. or Ct+rough tn:tKeOt1Qn of an aquf fer oy ;.;,ts or excavattons? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ',hi OeceN oration in ;rouna wattr juality. eiUer through oir•c; injeccion, or througn :he seeoage of iaacnatt. Cnasoates. letergents, watertorne virus ar oac:eria, or otrer suos:antes ~ ~ !nta .tie gcun0 watafs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Reduttivn in :he amount of ti+ater otherwli• ivatlable .'ar ~ ou0iic rater suo0lies' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :xoldnacion: New hames and roads wi 11 sl ightl,~ modi f,y absorpti on rates of soi 1. Street -storm drainaqe lwil l modify what exists now. v-?,dv S t udy ~u►~?~~S a, flora. 1A111 th proaosal result i res Mavoe Ho (a) Change in tne dlversity of saac%es, or nember of any soecles of 41or3 (includfnq trtes, inruas. yrass. crops. riCroflora and X aouatfc aiants)' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;Wi RMucL7on of :he Rua+Cen of any uniQue. ran ar endangered saetles of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . X ;c: Incrcauc:lon of new sptcias of flora 1nto an arsa. or in 3 Catrter Co che r1Crrta1 rMlenishm!!1t of ?xisting ypt{ies' . . . . . . . . . x qeduttion in screage of any iqrtcuitursl cropl • • • • . . • . . . . . ~ X _xaianation: New hQmes wil l 1 i kel y desire veqetation appurtenanT-to hausinq.- -"iuna. ai11 ;ne ~roaosal resuit in: 'es Maroe lo (a) Chanqes `n ,he divtrstty of satcies, ar numcAr of any sDeties ` of Eauna :5lrCS, land inirrtais intluding -eat1 ies, `+Sh InC 5rse1SffSh. bencnic qrgsnisms. lnstct5 :r nicrafawal? . . . . . . . . . . . x _ lal Qeduc:fon of the nwnotrs of any uniaw. rare, ar endangere4 X soectes of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) :ntrnduc:ion of new soecies of tauna into an ares. or result 1 n a barri er Lo .Re mi grati on or lovan+ent of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . X ;C) 3etrrlaratlon of axi5Ling `fgn or •ilQlffe haDitat? . . , , . , , , :xolana j~on: Some chanqe in diversity of animal like may be expPCtea as a - result of homes, especiati iy r,odent varieties. 5. vaise. MaY-'e Yo ;a) 'aill *.he prooasal !ncrease sx/stirtg rtoise ievels' . . . . . . . . . . . . . X =xalanat=an: /lpourtenant to new housi nq . . _iqnt ina :,S3r!. fes yavoe Yo r; a i ai 11 the arooosa 1 aroduce iew l i oht .:r y13re? Porch 1 i hts and street 1 i qhti n. wi 11 shed ~some 11 ~ - ~ 9 9 on the area. 2 1 I 1 • OPR EIPL.4PIATIO,y rs NanEOw►r. aLEAr ar:.cN O,+AL -14(JLs. 3. Lirtd Use. 'l+S `'hyDf .YO . ~ ;a) 'a1i1 :hs propasal *esult tn the eltaratyon of the presenL or, a : annea ; an a Qt in area? . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . ~ . A-- _ c :;t D 1 dttd tj Oft : 4- a ~ ZU r Yd[%irjl ;eSGUr*_a5. 4 iii "he ;rODO5d1 r!Sul: 'n: rs w3vhe Vo !a) Increese in the rau cf use of any naturai rssourcasl . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x {b) Oepletian ot any nonrtrte++abie natural resource? . . . . . • • • • • • • • • _ X :xoianation: 10. RtsK o* 'losac. Cees tne 3raaosai +nrroive a resk of in exalosian or ciu Yes Mavo~ 'ao re+easz j7 hazardous suos ancas (tncluCtng, buc nvt limicad *,o, eii, pQSLiC1Cls, chem'tCdls. CP t'3Ct3ti0n) in :he evMt Of an iCCidMt Or y upset tonaitlons' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,_n ExpTanatian: 11. PoQulacton. r=s '~ayae ro Will che proposai alter the locatfon. Qistributlon, denslty, or gra+rth , rau ot the human papulation of ;n area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ ix .p,,„at.om: New houses wi 11 attract nevf persons. 12. ~ousfnq. W111 th* crooosi) iffett exfs:lnq housinq, or create a ddnand far addttionai housinqi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -L - :xvi,n,t;an: 14i 11 add 2 duol exes and 4 hoq5es to the nei Qhhorhood 13. 'ransoarta:!on/r'.rcutacion. 'a11 . :ht Droaosal rlsul: ~n: 'r•s "ayce '+o (a) Generatton of addtttonal venlcuiar roverront? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Effec:s on exfstlnq Darkfng facilfties. 3r depand fcr new partifng? . . . . . . . . ~ (e) :aoaet uoon ectstlnq transport3tion systeaes' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Altarations ta aresent aatterns of clrculatlon or movenwt X of asooie analor gooos? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Al teraCtons to wetaroorne. rai 1 or ai r :rnfff c? . . . . . . . . , . . . . . Increiise :n craftic nazards to motar vehicies. X biCyclisLS or oe4astrtans? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exotanet:on: tiew home owners wi 11 li,ke] v havP ailtmmnhi 1 Pr. 13, ai:aStc Servic!►s. w111 tht orooosal havQ 3n 3ffsc: uoan, or result "es '"avCe tia in a need for -iew sr i1;er=4 goverrnwtal servi[ts in any .2f ot the foltcwing artas: ~a► Fire Pr'Otettian2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (b) Pol;ct arocection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (c) Schcolsl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) aarks or other retreational tatflities? . • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • ~rX i4; !►tin•.ananco Of pLib11c factlitles, fnciucfng rvadsi . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 7t1+er 70ve ment i servicas; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~'ew omes wil~l requi re ~the *above ~publ ic uti 1 i ti es . ~ Exol,nation: ; !F SPACE OGR EJfPG1NAi I4"i :S :'+ACEOIlATE, 2LE;Si AT'ACN %CO:T: 1"N:.l. ;=GzS. 1 ~ 5. ;nerij. ai 11 tht proocsal rtsul t in: (es "avar '+e I ia) Jse of tubstant;al atnounts 3i fxi or enerqy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) 3emanC :rOCm axisLinq sources if ensrgy, or eequtrt X the deveiocmnt of new seurces of tnEr;y? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . During and after construction, the new homes will require existing enerqy sourses, i.e. poafer, oil, and/or qas, etc. 16. Util+*.fes. 'af11 :he 3roac:al result in 3 rteea for new systen+s. fes "avae cr ilterat:ans ta we aa1lo++inc tit:licies: X (a) ?a.er ir netural 3as? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ;bl _anenuntcaci0n ;ys:en5' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ' 11 Sewef- 3r settti C tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . ~ - '=_i ::orm wattr lrainaSe'. . . . . . . . . x - 3 ~ r.. . ~17~i~.:. • ..'rt :i~1Qt~=4~L~1~~ :i~M~G '~,±•nl.:' .'.i.:vi'v~v~L ~'''l:G~. J , . r C . F ) So f ~ d +.as ta ana a i saosa 1 ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~ _.~~~artatfo~: The various uti 1 it~ district~ :~,i 11 nee~i tn ~,~n~_: ~~v~►eir ~ svster~, tr. accomr~~i~t~ the naar resi~i~nces. 'i~S "d~~:~' '~r, ; i. 4tS.sdn ~ Lri. ~11 r''~ ~r;,^,C53 ~^~5~1 C 1[1 :?'.t CTLaL10t1 flf llty '1M i U! naZar:S ~ vr ao[ent7dl tieaitn ~aZar~ !exCtuatnq -~nt31 n~lt~+;? . . . . . . . . . . . . _;~13n3";n: - ~ ' ..C~3 =5v~ . ,:i"~;, c r :'y ~GS~rJL_:Ofi ~f 3fty 5~6~t~ i;S:l ~r ~~ewr ODen.to Che pubiiC, or w1i1 :he.pr+aposai resutt in the crt3tic» o! 3n aes.rt~cicnll~ ~tfgnsive s~te aaen ~c cuaiic ~ie,+? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X =*_!3niL~~n; ` y. ?a;rp-~.~^n. ,~i'' :`e ~r^~a<_ai ^~sui : •n :n '^cac: .oon -:~e :~1 . ~udfl~t_y :t ~,c~5:~~,3 "s•~1'y3: C~~i _~DGr'urt.'?S' . . . . . . . ~ ar_=*' -n: - -7. =r_^~~''.•JC"~ i ..ci<--,.., _1' . .s1 ~ ]`'^..^.Q53 ~ '?5J~ _ : i `nr::' _~S ]r _ ac u, -a Slytltt'C31^' }T_'E•a :~'.:3! ~r 'St~r~=: , :."7::'~ra. _ ,ar' 'r ..~.7' ~ / ~ - = ~ ~ ~x^~3~a*_'~^~: ~t... i. tne un~rsiqned. 5r~r ~nt2tf *_tfe pQnai Ly of ~~j~ry tlf:t Lhe dDQv! ~eSaCn58S irR mdC! tT'utnfully 3nd :0 :he "e3t Of Tly RROti11CQg~►, ; 3~50 underst3nd _11dt~ ShOUlcf trere SC drty wf ~~fU~ +rt~Srl~r_S@nLdL~Of1 Ot ri?1!u( 13Ck Of full ~3fsclos+~re ~t ~ry ~ar*..Spoicane C:,u~ty may wrt~Qrdv any dettaration of nonstqn~~~cance :.hat 1t ~~~gnt 7s~ve reifance ~oQn rhis cnetkiist. ~~L?' / ` rr!` ~ ~ a'^C , _ onen : ' , ~ ~ ~'e3SB .^~'7L :r '~~Py ~'-.y~~ren*.: ~t"C'nt r1cf;.i r~l ey- ► r~~~f1S~'1~;'S #~~~r..~ ;~Gro55: RI . l l~ ~ 1 ~1nS . 922-0702 Kealtv a~cne: r- / ~ ?D,''S'!i ~:.~C~t'C1RC ~~rT;~ , ~ ~hone:,J - ~ , ~_.r ~ Da Lt ~ :8~ar~r.~nt c~ uff~:e ~f ;,~unCy ~rie~ing ~:~ettc'. iSL: ~~1 ~ _'`.3f~ ti!!Q~lr'. i ~ ~!!v' °Mt+'~ _'~irk' q~~ ~ i ~ p OfF1Ct 0v T%E - ~ DOD~'RTMgNT A. UNI-y 'P . ~,~,~'~1~1G 1Q. 7 SPOKANE CQ J~rp q ~t. ~ 3 4*-1 97 Subject ~ Legal Description For Transwestern Realty Job No. 1395 Ju1y 9, 1979 That portion of Block 9 of Corbin Addition to Greenacres as per plat thereof recorded in Volume S. page 30 of "Plats" in the Office of Spokane County Auditor more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the point on the Easterly prolongation of the North line of Block 9 of said plat which is 38 feet East of the Northeast corner of said Block 9; thence South parallel with th@ East line of Block 6 a distance of 500 feet more or less to the North right-of-way af Alki Avenue; thence West parallel with the North line of said Bl ock 9 to a poi nt whi ch i s 319 feet N~"~a,st of the Southwest corner of sai d Block 9; thence North parallel with the East line of said Block E a distance of 500 feet more or less to the PJorth line of said Block 9; thence East along the PJorth line of said Block 9 to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above described land which lays in Primary State Highway number 2 and except the right-of-way deeded to Spokane County by the State of lolashington as per document filed under the Spokane County Auditors file number 7806200040. , , ~ o y n r .O i q C . ~ ~ ~ D~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ''n: -Cl ~ ` , ECEIVE ~'L 1 `0 -919 ~ SPOKANE COUNtY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 ~ SPOKAiVE COUNTY HEALTH D~STRI CT _ I nter-Uffi ce Corrimuni ca ti on Date: Julv 11, 1979 T0: Spokane County Planr~ing Commission ~ ~ FROIjj: Dennis Kro11~R.S., and Eugene C. Prat r, R.S. SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - Maxwell Addition 1. References: a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 50' by Senske and Associates; dated June 25, 1979, received by this office June 26, 1979. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geoloqy North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Departsnent of Water Resources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the SPokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metropolitan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Draft 208 Study Quality Cause and Effect Report for Vera wells #1 and #2. g. Field Survey Report, Dennis Kroll, Spokane County Health District, July 9, 1979. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, Soils, and Water: a. This project lies in a relatively flat area between Greenacres and Barker on north side of Alki. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5$ slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. R ECEIVED JUL l i1979 ' SPOKANE COUNTY ('L4NNING DEPARTMENT S-CN D- AGM--11 8 ♦ Maxwell Addition , July 11, 1979 Page 2 d. The data from 2 Vera Irrigation District wells in the area shows the wells total nitrogen level was 1.8 ppm. The Vera Irrigation District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 8 dwelling units (2 duplex lots and 4 single-family lots) on 3 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids con- centration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast i.mpact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present i.mpact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.07 to 1.80 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 1.16 ppm. to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: ~ Maxwell Addition July 11, 1979 Page 3 (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that: a. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. b. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the f inal plat. (Note: The first sentence is superfluous if the easements are shown on the preliminary map as required by Ordinance Chapters 5 and 6.) c. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system. d. An on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Healtil District prior to filing of the Final Plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved." e. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded'service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." f. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use. domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by tne water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in con- formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. ~ d ~ Maxwell Addition July 11, 1979 Page 4 g. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made witn the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provisi.on holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. h. Tfie plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed witnin this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." i. The sponsor shall certify prior to final plat that no private or public water source; are located on or within 150-feet of the plat boundary. j. Also, all wastewater systems intended to be used by any existing structures shall be clearly identified and located prior to final plat. k. Due to the limited drainfield areas on the triangular lots, it will be necessary for no portion of a structure to be closer than 26 feet to the east boundary of lot 4, and 30 feet to the west boundary of lot 6. ts c: Senske and Associates 9803 E. Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 ~ ~ R ECEIVED JUL 10 1979 SPOKAN . E COUNTY Sewerage Alternatives - PlANNlNG DEPARTMENT ol lots Z/oo gallon per day SZ.S' L. f. drain field Thrce alternatives for sewaqe di.sposal will be analysed: (1) On-site septic tank (2) Community septic tank (3) Community package trea tinent plant (1) On-site septic tank Canital costs_ ~ @ $ ~/oo Annual costs Pumping @ 3 year intervals $ Drain field replacement @ 10i/yr ~ Total 0 b M annual costs $R~i'd (2) Cotnmunity septic tank Capltal costs (Est.) 4~~ qallon multi-chamber tank install.ed $ Lift station with appurtenances Dra in f ield @ SZS- L. f. 4A675- 8~11 ' sewer. age 1 i ne 4SO L. f. @$49•:70 manholes @ $ ,1So clean out @ $ I,oss of. 1 lot ~ Z°e a $ Anntial 0 & M costs Pumping ( Est . ) nrain f ield replacement Periodic ].ine cleaning ~.~7 .5@ti Electrical & pump maintenance `rotal 0 & M annual cost.s $ R(#,~ ~ ~ r v ~ Page 2 (3) Community package treatment plant Capital costs Lift station, aeration chamber, clarifier and chlorination chamber with necessary appurtenances $ W~00 Drain field 4 4~ Z_S7 8" sewerage line _LZS_V 2 manholes ~ 7r o cleanout Loss of lot (s) $ 'FIr Annual O & M costs Pumping clarif ier $ 2a~o Drain f ield replacement - 46 7.S-P Periodic line cleaning %3 ~"s-o Electrical, pump and tank maintenance 'Sea05 Total annual O& M costs $ 2po,,l- The following table summarizes the costs associated with the three alternative sewage waste disposal systems considered: Annual Cost/Unit Capital Cost/Unit On-site septic tank $ 110 $ g S-0 Community septic tank -16 q- 30 Community package treatment plant -212 D c c? PRFLIMINAR'i PLAT CONFEREPJCE CNECKLIST (Return this sheet with the Application) R Date of Conference: ECEIVED ~ -Sec : ~ g Twnshp.~ ~ Range 1979 _ ~ • Total Acres: • 5 t- No. of Lots SPOKANE COUNn PL~:NNlNG DEPARTMFNT Proposed P1 at Name APPL ICANT 'S NAME / ~ o 1l.1. f=- ADORESS : e?~ r PHONE: Zip: q-29.0-6 THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE PLANNItIG DEPART- MENT FOR HEARING BY THE PLaNNING COMMISSION, EXPLAINEC IN DETAIL ON THE ?NFORMA?'ION REQUIREMENTS HAND-OUT SHEET: ~ ~~~FULL PRELIMINARY PLAT FEE ($i 95.00 +$S.OCi 1 ot :"laxi~nu~,~ - VIO-F ' d) , ~ PLAT APPLICATION (EXHIBIT A) (All signature blocks complete) ~j. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp) ENGINEERS SECTION MAPS (EXHIBIT C) (Witn parcel 4's) 4-.--'ASSESSORS SECTION MAP (1) (EXHIBIT D) (Show other owned or o?tioned land) ~5!1PRELIMINARY PLAT MAPS ~~(EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required) A. 2 BLACKLINE COPIES (DO-NOT FOLD BLACKLINE PRIPJTS) ~ ~ B. /BLUELINE COPIES G6: DEVELOPMENT PLANS (EXHIBIT F) 6--1J SEWAGE STUOY REPORT ( Provi de 3 al ternati ves ) A.2 WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water szrvice) B. STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS (If required by Engineers) C. LANDSCAPING PLANS (Required when land use conflicts might occur) 0. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If required by Engineers) ~---3':E711VIR("~tiMENTAL CHECKL I ST (EXH I S IT G) (S60.00 Fze Kcqu i►-ed; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STAFF REV I EW Of PROPOSAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FTE ►a [75 u.r 1A, z-"i=7 A. UNIQUE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES: ~ 'i`-`~• B. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - (-42~ C. COMMENTS. • ~ ~r` l' • _ iL l~ (a Tv Date ` ~Piat Adminis rator ► ~ ~ . Pe`- / 33~? - I ~ ' ~ ~ar w e~ / •b 0 ECEIVED& ~ . EXHIBIT a U L 10 1979 FRELIMIlVARY PI.,AT APFLICATION FORM J ALL SIGNA~NflffikkNNN- PAGE.S z AND i,T.UST 3E FILLID IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETO'RNIlVG TO M Part i- To be comple t-ed 'oy agulicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE****:**_*:*,«**:***s:***s*s****s****~*~***.•:*~.,~*:#~*~*:~*s*s*:«~*~**~#:*=**s** Total amouni of Ia.nd i-n this Subdivision: Acres Tota1 Number of Lots 6 Prvposed density of the Plat: ` Lots/Gross Acre Tota1 amount of adjoining land controlled by,thia owner or sponsor: p Acres Proposes IIse of controlled adjoining land: n/a • What is the driving distance in milea to the nearest fire station? Shopping facilities? Municipal Boundarp: lnr,ilpQ Paved street or higiway ? LAND USEss**ss*~~**s*ss~s*s*s*~:~:.,~s~~~**s*s*~*#ses+~*:*s*=~~*s*s*~**s*:s#s*s*s***sssss~:*s~.:** Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( X). Duplexes ( X). Indicaie lots for duplexes: ~ Mul-ti-familq dwelli.ng units ( Indicate whrch ots: Mobile Homes ( Other ( I3escribe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: What is the present use oi the gronerty proposed ta be platted? List type of uses: Cul tivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: ~ acres. Other: Acre s Is keeping of aaimals deaired? No ( x). Yes ( Type: IMP~OVIl~iENTS:*:**~.*****~**~***.M***s**...*:**.:.~*~*,~~~t****:::*~*.*:**~*~:.*...~.~*:.*:#*::, Do you pla.n to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-prase deve- i op;nent? may t,r; -:h ,n nhas - rroj.ect rno what level of improvement ~~ri11 streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minim~. Curb and 3ravel ( Curb and Paved C Paved only C Je6cribe any combinations of above: 16 fee !._vPr;e_n_t 1 o tr--e . x wi .h anY~r ni at _ coyer:ants 'dhat is the time period expected for complete develonment of the Plat: Street im~arovements completed? ~ . Substantial nua~ber of lots occupi~-ed- Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( Ye6 ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Squ,a..re feet Number of bedrooms • Estimated Sa1e Price . Will buildings be built on tne lots be=ore tY,ey are sold: No ( X). Yes ( Will any sgecial deed restrictione be +.ncluded in the sale of lots? No Yes C If "yes", explain: Indicate the proposed method of sewage 3isposal: Septic tank Lagoon ( Treatcnent plant ( )o Other, or cvmbinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Indivi3ual we11s ( Public system ( X). j'rivate commlnity system ( ) . Ir_dicate methoc of extending sarvice to the lots (Dwellings): Undergrcund uti-lity easements ( X). 0verhead uti.l.ity easement3 Utilyties in straets ( ivo easerr.ents ( ) o incicate the distance from t'' propos~ to tYie arest e~sting water mteet Inc?ica+e si.-e af nearsst : in hes. ~ . . ~ ~ E X H I B I T A P_ELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) page Z UTILIZ'IES - CContinued)*s*y~*ss~**►***~**~s*~~*.***~*~~******s*ssss**~sr*~s*~ssss*s*~ts*~*s~ss; List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to thi s Plat: Electricity: ~L~p •Gas: ~ Water: Phone: ,2_3 ACKNOWLEDG~+IF~trI'S~*s**:~~ss*s~*s**s***~*s*~s~s**~~s~*~~*:******e****~**~s**s*s***~r**s+~***~*s~~* PROPasm PIAT NaRE: I, zhe unc"tersigned, have completed the iniormation requested, and the Prelimin,ary Plat has been p me under my supervisio - accordance wi,. h the requirements of the Spokane Co tment aad the law of the Stat o% a 'r_gtin. ($1. gTle d ) ~ • @ : (Address) qFna F_ Phone : •.'~f6~~0•• , Zi-0: /0,~ C~.1 : • [ lA S''JRVEYOR' SEAL : I, the undersigned, swear under tre penalty of perjury that the above responses a.re made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the prelimin.ary plat, or, if not the owner., attached here- with is written permission from said owner authorizing my action.s oa his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misregresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. (Si ed) Date : /d ~ ~ l-7 9 . (Address) la-~ A/. lldV44 Phone : Zip: NoTARY Date : 7 4 - NOTARY SEAL: ;~:«*::~*.sss*~►s~*****.*s#~* ~ *r~*~~~#..s* ~s~:::#~s:s~ss*~sss.,~***~s...~~s~s.*~*►:#,«*..**: ~'Y1 a K L##v 191k ' Fart I1 - to be comple-ted by rrater purveyor ~ A. This subdivision (i is not) situated within our service area. B. We are (able) (no a e) aud walling to supply this subdivision with adequate water for (dome ati c ire ) (i.ndustrial cotamercial ) use s. M I}% ~I iZ~'e ~l.ov1! -75AD Eap M I C. S-FlMactory arMgem-ent e oeen made to serve this proposal. D. Signature (only when items A, B& C true a.ad completed) - ' ►9 . purveyors name signature and tit e date «*~*~*~*.s*~*s*s*s*s***#**~****~*~s*s:s*r~•*.~*»:+s::*s~***#s:*ss:~*:~*ss*:..:::*****~~*.***s~*: Part III-to be co=letPd by He81th Ir strict A. ?Iealth District staff' has cor:lpleted a t'::eld :Lnvestigativn of t,iie s+te. B. uea.Lth Dist_rict rev_u:.rements for D.-eli"T►inAr f piats~ve,) have r_ct 1been sa ;,_s-f;ed. C. Si - e / C ~ - • . le s; gnattt.re and titie ~~s#yc:a #*saas:■tR~s sIesYs taf ycse Iey[#*,*s#sas #s*s=ri*s a♦ iie* ss=s#t#t*~*#tss t*i• ~ s s#saa: x t Ra s:t sr NI'y#,t,e,c , ► i ExH zB zr n PRELIMIlYARY FLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Pave ~ *#rr#s***~*#~r!#t;**#~*M*~i*r~**~s**~#*****~~**t***~**~***r*****~**#**~***sas~#*:ss**ss=*s~#~ Pa.rt iJ - to be completed by County Engineers 0*Iice A. Coun.ty Engi.neers Office requirements for preliminasy plats Fve) (hlav? r_c been satisfied. sub tie ~T' ~C'o 4~p~~ al e~ ~Y-c~,~N q,a~o e~Q l B. Sigaature ~ y 7/ ~ f f sign4ture an/title date l.~ ~~s~..«~**..**:~#~..#*~:.**:.**«.*t*~*~*t**:*~~**.*#***.~*s~**.*.«*~******.:**~~:.~*..:***.~~ Part V- to be completed by County IItilities Dept. A. County IItilities Department re irements for prsliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. ignature 4RJ2 ~ signature and tle date #ittsry#ksks#*i!*+1#*t~*~#t1Mk*##~#i*#okk#t##**###t~t##~*##Mi~*;MR*It#~~*~~*Yrly*k*Mc1#k#ik~#t~#~f~#* This part to be completed by Plann.ing Department Planninq Department Inforr.iation . Date Submitted: Preliminary Pla I'ee: Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: 40 Plat File No.: 1.3 33 Zone Change File No.~~ ~7w./Q r"7 . Plat Name: AAA- . Existing Zoning: Number of Lots : ~ Date Established : Location : Sec. 18 T2, ~r Rd*,I!r Advertised Zone Change : Ais 4Q ~ V;~-Iod 2 School District: c&7~i4L,UhLLf''" 1i Hearing Date: R . ECEIVED , 10 ]979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNlNG DEPARTMr-NT ~ - 1 R ECEIVED JUL ,J. 0 IJI J . sPohaNE couNn . , PLANNtNG DEPARTfOENT ~ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ - 2736 RECEIPT Date ~ 19~1 ~{ecelved Fram ~~i c~,l-e- ~ v~:. s w ~v~ G V,x T9 zo ~ Address 4 'bo li a rs g ~2$S ~ ~0 ^ u{~- ~ ~.tt r« Fc~r ' ~.w 1 •~1.~,,~v~~~ G ~n, - ~ ~ C~. c~-~i s-! - ~ 6 ' D HOW PAID ~W~ CQUNTY PLANNING DI.r~LU~.a~~Z ACLOUNS~ ~ AMT OF I CASH ~ ACCOUNT ~ fC4 v! AMT pAIp ~ CNECK 0 p BAIANCE ~I MONEY ~ BV DUE 1 ORDER _ ~ ~ 8K806 Redifprm