The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1322-79 . j a AGENDA, August 28, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMh1ITTEE TIME: Thursday, August 28, 1980 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1D on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EXTENSION OF TIME 1D. PE-1322-79, SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION (Formerly Brooks Addition) ao Location: The proposal is located in tne Spokane Valley on the NW corner of the intersection of Glass Avenue and Ella Road. b. Legal Description: Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, except the east 70.56 feet of the south 158.62 feet, located in Section 6. c. Sponsor: John B. Byers N 408 Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Simpson Engineers N 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: .8 acres f. Number of Lots : 3 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Orchard Avenue Irrigation DIstrict 76 j. School District: . West Valley School District #363 k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environ- mental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act 4JAC-197-10-530 (2) provides that: "....in the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." m. The applicant is requesting a Time Extension to September 1981. - 4 - z z a Q ~ o ~ ~ i W I.+r- i > a (L / T VY P, 26 N. W ELLESLE~ N~Rr~ AVE. . Vi EL 19 ELLESLEY AVENUE z ~ ~ .73 74 ~Q 6~ ; * p 80 aI 82 N~ 64 85 86 87 ~ ~ 91 92 93 94 ~ 96 I 65`66 6/ 68 T"1~y. 25 ~ A' r~ r- ~ U 71 71 1~ U 0 ' a R~~1f_ ( Sekon~' -j i • ~ ~ ~ iW J ~ 0 ~R~ ~ ~ ;S~ ; ~ . ( ~ I` W > v~~~~ BOV SCOUf COr7rU cM ~ r DR~vF ~ Id I Et r9 S 9/-\ 4Ra i' ~ OR ~ ~ .r ~ ~ ? ■ ~ ~ 1 40 f J r--=-'~' • ~ ~ 0 Q 0 ~ . . ■ o ~ > ~ ~ • a 0,A(14/`/ MARIµct0 Q , Q ~ ~ EC /.9 48 ` orrho~' RW~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~j (rLA SS~ W AN a Q R I pC,E' 00 OR P°'°M 1 ~ Z y ~ ! T ~ - 118ERTa W ~ + 1 z Q' W o 3 v~ a POSa ~ C~E'•~ ~ 1 ~ - ~0 EU I~ yJj ~ > _ .uc ~ MNI ~ j Av ~ ~.re► ~ } Y ~ ;r. ..u;` ok' ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~c , , v E' R : ; z F ~1,~ ~ a f \1SP~ : ~1~~. ~Q ~ - - ~ fAiRviE ~ Y ~c,~ ll1__~..~p~ • ` U )-4 , t VL 950 ~f ~ • ~ 64 r AAY"-L 1.• ~ U . j L18RARY •Ra,C ' ~V ~ a•Y:;' t N ~y - IEC CnEY AvE. tYE, AvE L~ 111-1 , A ~ _ i y7 ~ 1}4' ~■000 ~ ,A ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ Z l • , , ~ • AGENDA, August 28, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNT`f PLAPIiVIlVG SUBOIVISION yEARING EXAi'lIiNIER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, August 28, 1980 - 9:00 A.M.(Item r1D on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PREL IMINARY SUBD IV I S ION - EXTE"!S ION OF T IME 10. PE-1322-79, SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION (Formerly Brooks Addition) a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Val 1 ey on the NGJ corner of the intersection of Glass Avenue and Ella Road. b. Legal Description: Section 6, Tovinship 25N, Range 44 E;JM Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, except the east 70.56 feet of the south 158.62 reet, located in Section 5. c. Sponsor: John B. Byers N 408 Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Simpson Engineers V 909 Argonne Rcad Spokane, +r1A. 99206 e. Site Size: .8 acres f. PJumber of Lots : 3 g. Proposed Land Us2: Single family darellings h. cxisting Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Orchard Avenue Irrigation DIstrict 76 j. School Di stri ct: lilest Va 11 ey School Di strict ;;'303 k. ilethod or Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adeouate information to assess the adverse Environ- mental Impacts of the proposal, The State Environmental Policy Act WaC-197-10-530 (2) provides that: "....in the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." M. The applicant is requesting a Time cxtension to September l, 1981. - 4 - . ' ~ , y ~ , . ' ~ •i • AGENJA, August 30, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKA(dE COUNTY PLANNIPJG SUBDIVISIOi`J HEARItdG EXAMINER C0[V1PiITTEE TIME: Thursday, August 30, 1979- 9:00 A.M. (Item #5 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOPd PE-1322-79, BROOKS ADDITION a. Location: Tne proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on the NW corner of the i ntersecti on of Gl ass , avenue and Ella Road b. Legal Descri pti on: Secti on 6, Townshi p 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, except the east 70.56 ft. of the south 158.62 ft, located in Section 6. c. Sponsor: John B. Byers N 408 Pi nes Spo!<ane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Charles E. Sinpson N 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 , e. Site Size: .8 acres f. Number of Lots: 3 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. LJater Source: Orchard Avenue Irrigation District #6 j. School District: West Valley School District #'363 k. flethod of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks l. Environmental Ii»act: A topic of discussion at tnis Hearing may be whether the Hearing Exaniner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmen-Lal Policy Act l,lAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." r , - 5 - z z ' ~ < , h y~~ ~ ~ ~ T W P, 26= N. wELLESLE'~w NpRr~~' AV E. 19 ELLESLE'Y AV E~fUE 6-~ 65 ~ I61 68 P, N. 73 74 6~ ~I 82 : N~ B4 85 B6 $7 9 i 92 93 94 4`' 96 ~ ~ ~ ~n 69 71 7t Q' 6Lk ~ e) w t4,w ~ ~ W Bav Scouf cofnp I ' D RlvF I . ~ F ~ M~I +~~i; • ~ I d Er~ l959n • ~ a D ~ ~jZ~~ P ~ ~ - ` - ~ ~ ~ ~ CL L) IIIlll iY - ~ I f l ~ f > . • ~ a ~ S n=ZZ _ ry~' Y ~ < 0 0 ty rr EL 19 48 ~ Av'e L.L ~l N kD a Q r uBERrv~ CL 0 IL 47 EU > uC , M+'l ~ A V __am 1it ~ } ~ ~ ~ ,a~. • ; ~ , . i , ~t e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • z i Df ~ ~ ~ i#~ Q - ~ .~,~~,j::.~• ul YJ .~F po : fA, Rvi£ =..a.., '1 tI ~ • , Y . ~ ° • 9.~J ~ ►~a ' ~ ~ LiBRARY , R . , . ~ ~ ~ I~' CMkY Av~. kYE AV~C ~~t,•.~t. t.~ r~_ /y0/y 4 't rt ~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~ Ar ~s~I MAftt `JI ! ~ ~ • 4 4 ~ \ , - -L ~ ~ 1 , N 0 . $1 1079 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ~ PE-1322-79= ) ~ IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL ) PLAT OF SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION ) R E S 0 L U T I 0 N (FORMERLY BROOKS ADDITION) LOCATED ~ IN SECTIOIJ 6, TOWNSHIP 25N, ~ RANGE 44 E.W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, ~ WASHINGTON. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE QOARD OF COUNTY COPIMISSIONERS OF SPOKAWE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION Tract 35 of ORCHARD AVENUE ADDITION, EXCEPT the East 70.56 feet of the South 158.62 feet thereof, in Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Neari'ng Examiner Committee, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. , PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS D A Y OF 19~~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , . ATT EST : VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of Board By . , t ► ~ ORCHARD AVLNUE IRRIC,ATION DISTRICT NO. 6 EAST 7415 MARIETTA AVENUE SPOKANE VVASHINGTON 99208 PHONE 926-4583 September 16, 1981 R ECEIVED ~ SEP 16 1981 1 ~ Spokane County Health District SPOKANE COUNTY W. 1101 College sPokane, WA 99205 PIANNING DEPARTMENT To Whom It May Concern: This letter is being submitted to Spokane County Health by request of Mr. John Byers. This Subdivision, previously knocan as Brooks Addition and currently known as Severen Jo Addition, Block 1, Lots 1, 2, & 3, lies within our service area. Orchard Avenue Irrigation is willing to supply this said Subdivision with adequate water for pomestic and Residential Fire Flow usage. Satisfactory arrangements have been made to serve this proposal and water service will be i.nstalled after proper application. Respectfully Submitted, ORCHAR.D AVENUE IRRIGATION DISTRICT N0. 6 r Daniel J. Bannier tidater Superintendent DJB:las ~ cc : rZr. . John Byer s ~ e Transamerica I ransamerica "T"iUo; Ir7surance Conipanii - ~ Titie Insurance Service r North 720 Argonne fio: ~ Spokane. Wjshington ~ G ~~rr (509) 922-2222 ED ~ , - - - - - - - - - - - - - , UN 12 1981 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY THIRD pV1NN1NG DEPAR7MEHT ' CFRTIFICATr T(1 PLAT Order No.: 102401-M Certif_icate for Filing Proposecl Plat of SEVERIEN-JO AvDITION Spokane County Plannin; Coinmission N. 721 Jefferson Spolcane, Washington Gentlecnen - In the matter of the plat submitted for your apnzoval, t1_Zis Comnan_y has examined tlze rECOids of Che County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washin ;ton , and tlle rECOrds oE the Clerlc of the L'nited States Courts holding terms in said Countv, and from such examiization herevy cextifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spol:ane County, to-wit '1'r~ic:L 35 oj MTi:NllT", Al)l)I"i'it)m ~s per plat Lt1QreoL recorded i i1 "H" OF af;e 2/E , E:GCI'T t11e Las L 70 . 56 fee t o r the South 1.58. 02 feeG tlicroo.C; SituaLc in LIlc COLiilLy o.C Spol:ane, SG~t:e of Wasl1ington V L""1'I:l) Li1 ,.1F, ;S S IWOOKS Z-11-1cl l:Df'1'11 C i31:OOKS , 11usband and 1~7:Lle , , , };X (;l`1 I''C lUi•:s 1 1,~:3t>> l~ t~ tca levLed by OL"c_llal"d Averlue Zrrigation 1) ls C L L~. ~ i` t` (i 2 P,entrictiv^ coven.`3Tits cciiit_nined iti Wnrrnnty I?eed from Qrchard 1lvenue IrrigaCiail Dic3t-rict No. G, Graiitor to Clazence lIvwarci ilnr_moti nticl G-ncvi_^_ve liiirmon, htiahnnd and wife, Grantees, filed Septemhcr 30, lyls3, af; DocunienC rio. 599338A, na tollow8: Any garngc, harn or ol_hcr vuthuildin~; congtructecl upon said tracC sliall he uer bacl: at 1e1i9r eighty feet froRi the frcnt strect line of unicj LrncL- f111d shaLl be prC?[UpCLy completed acid paintecl, ntia thot the ciwellirip, hotzge, when constcucted, shall Ue nct h~ick pt 1easC 1_hirty-five fect from sucli gtreet line, e;:cert in caae wtlr_re tlley mn_y be set closer to correspond with othcr awc Llings previoua Ly built on said s treet . (c(Int_i ntic'd) ~ ~ . ` • nrder No. 102401-11 Second rerti-Ficate to PZa pap;e 3 CnSCIiF?iT, INCLUUING TllE 1'E:itMS ANU CONDITIOiiS TIIERF;IN: Graii tors : .1ess C. Brouks and Eci i th I. Brook.8, hue bai1d and wife • GranCes.: 1llc Waf;hinFton Water PUCaer Company, a . corpor.itioti PurPoSC ; 1?1ectrica1. (lictribution linc over Trar_t 35, Location: cxccpL thc F,asC 70.56 feFr vf the Sourh 150111.62 feer, with the right to inspect 8ald 1 Lr~~ 9nd remove bruah ancl treee Ua r.ed : OC: tOE)E:X' 29, 1947 r Recorcleci : Novcmbcr 7, 1947 Doc:umEnr Nu.: 732903A A.ffecta : Ttic West line of the above cleecribed property. ~a i)i:l:[) 0 17 l;ll,1;"[ ~\:Ii) 'i 1•.I:i i; ~\i]1) '[111~R1',t1r Gr'Iritc~r S. 13rooic:> and }:cli Co I. 13rooks, llusbaild and w t `c TL 'I 1",ill`, 11"IC'1"1 C.l 'J 1 t., 1 c T11Sllt a I1CE' GOiil[)a l"1\1 • he 17c f- i c:L, I I'v !',1cI f1c F i I-:,t l'eclcr a I Saviri f;s a nd i.oan nssc~cia tioi 11 CM-l)cw,l I_ 1(~[1 ; 06 . 800 00 0,1 L ccl Au(,w, l?/s, 1971) I~~~c'c~t'cl('ci Sc1) L c-ii~hei' 28, 1.~79 I:ecorditl}; ilc., 70 02 79 NOTE 1• C-eneral taxes for the year 1981 have been paid in full in the amount of ~175.43 (Pa7cel No. 06543-2610). Assessments for the year 1981 have been paid in full in the • amount oL- $178 . 50 to Orchaxa Avenue Irrigatijon mi-sti ict No. 6 Records exami.ned to June 9, 1981 at 8• Cln A:^'. TRYiNSAMFRICA TITLE INSi1R,ANCE CnMPANY Ii Y Andree R. Chicha cc • Spokane Countv F-ngineers cc• Simpson rngineers ~ 4 Y RECEIPT Date 1-7 10" 1 0, 10 '9 Received From Ad d r ss ~ Doliars $ F o r v.. , j ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID aMT oF -&P04ANL COUNTY PI.ArIIVlNG DEFARTDajq ACCOUNT CA5H AMT PAID CNECK By v~/~~ ~ BADUECE i I ORONEY ~ ~i 8K806 Redifptm CLAR'- 'CE E. SIMPSON ENGINEER, iC. CIVII ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS' N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99206 Telephone:926-1322 To: ~Do kaeLl,_ Xl ~ . ~ SUBJECT: AdlAh^ . + G ~e DATE: Gliolp, T"1 TTA e'_h 4 Q1^2. ~ r' c~ C~ ~ ~j ~ Q h C~l ~ ~ Y~ ~ S ia~ A d tl. +10+` 4:r Ycl~ t2 i l 1Cr ) Q ~ s. BYbokr A I 4t,0^ ~~...T CL-C ee.sc p.- 's C.v 0 L. ~j v"o + Gl. HOw 1 h~+ vip m E. . O t°. ill, W. ° 0 e r 6TI`~.~'i 4 R IVED JuN .1p1981 ~M W-uN, Y PiANNiNG pEPARTMENT Signed ~ ~ s ~ _ File No. PE-1322-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FI NDI NGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION . This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on August 28, 1980, and - the members of the Committee present being Ted McCoury Chairperson, John Culler and Paul Sceva. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, John B. Byers, is requesting approval of an Extension of Time PE-1322 Severien-Jo Addition (Formerly Brooks Addition) for subdivision of .8 acres into 3 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representarive: JOHN B. BYERS C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the sponsor has made reasonable progress on the Preliminary Piat and that an Time Extension is warranted. 1 . ~ File No. PE-1322-79 D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. . That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. Al) extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing A,gencies. ~ . That a time extension be granted to September 1, 1981. UT171LITES: (1) On-site sewage systems be allowed under the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health Districfi and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer. (2) The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to profiest legal assessments for any utility local improvement district to provide central sewerage service to this property. (3) Water service shall be provided by Orchard Avenue I rrigation District in accordance with the Coordinated b'Vater System Plan for Spokane County. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of John Byers for an Extension of Time, PE-1322-79 Severien-Jo Addition and Zone Change as described in the application should be approved. 2 . ~ File No. PE-1322-79 Motion by: Sceva Seconded by: Culier Vote: Unanimous to Approve HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ~ ' C h a i r&r",-- i - . ~ ATT EST : ~ WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director B y: ~ D a t e d ' 3 ~ NE4RINu ExAMINER COMMITTEE Pl1BLIC HEAR1OO HEARING -XAMIN'ER COM+IITTEE PU9LIC fIEARINu APPLICATION NO:7--~~ ~ ; APPLICATION N0:E - ~ ~ 2-1 - ` (Chec~c one) (Chec~C one) _ I wou3d like ta be on recarrf Zn I wou1d like ta be an record in ZE7 FA1IOR ~ FAU4R OPPOSITION OPPOSITIQN ~ ~ NE~JTI~AL NEUTRA , ~'I~Y a~ th~s H~aring? Da yau wish t~o T~ESTIFY ,at this Nearang? Do you wish to TES - YES Z~:7 YE5 ~ MO JC7 NO YOUR NAME: YOUR MAME: (piease print (please print ~~dres~: J~ A I`~40~r~..~ Ar~dress : J~ • ~ 6 s I ' ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - August 28, 1980 PE-1322-79, SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION (FORMERLY BROOKS ADDITIOId) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND EXTENSION OF TIME I. GENERAL INFORMATION • A. History The preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner eommittee on August 30, 1979. The Sponsor indicates that the final plat is presently being reviewed by the County Engineers Department. The sponsor is therefore requesting a time extension. B. Locatioa The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley, at the northwest corner of Glass Ave. and Ella Road. C. Proposal - .8 acres subdivided into 3 lots for single family dwellings. - Lot frontage = varies from 70.5 feet to 80 feet. - Lot sizes = 11,200 sq. feet. II. SPECIAL INFaRMATION A. Circulation ' The Couaty Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those conditions aiready attached to the preliminary plat of record. B. Sewage Disposal The sponsor has proposed individual on-site sewage disposal systems which have been authorized by the Health District. C. Drainage The County Utilities Engineer reports that the final construction plans must be reviewed and approved prior to the filing of the final plat. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Orchard Avenue Irrigation District # 6. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #1. -4B- STAFF ANALYSIS - August 28 -980 PE-1322-79 - contin ~ w ~ F. Schools The proposal lies within the boundaries of West Valley School District #363. III. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. Al1 extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 3. That a time extension be granted to September 1, 1981. UTITII,ITES : (1) On-site sewage systems be allowed under the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer. . • (2) The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest legal assessments for any utility local improvement district to provide central sewerage servlce to this property. (3) Water service shall be provided by Orchard avenue Irrigation District in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. -4C- 5PO~ANE VALLE(l FIPAE DEPAPATIAENT ~~ezl'~ 7"& ,Vt~-e I EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 ,Oale, /ie v~'2e, J!~?/~l August 20, 1980 3~ E Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator ;0 c N721 Jefferson j"10 Spokane, Washington 99260 SpOKANE COUNITY Dear Ms. Raines: e: % P L A NNNG DEP A R:f,,fiE1V T The following subdivisions'and zone classifications for upgrading have been reviewed for fire protection: PE-1188-78 Pace Add ition ZE-58-78 Crosby - A , ~PE-1322-79 Byers PE-1323-79 Byers PE-1356-79 Belle Terre lst Addition ZE-250-79 Ball ' - - y . PE-1382-80` ,Replat of Grandview Acres ' ZE-108-80° ' Bonuccelli PE-1384-80,-,Weatherwood ' ~ZE-105-80 - --Kuula The above ne d mains and hydrants to be installed in the areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around'the buildings shall be approved prior,) to building permit issuance. Sin0erely, _ ✓ „ Larry lhucker "f Lt. of Inspectors . LS.sn C ~ PRE I E1 • 1 Fi i a L S Sl i VE i.I i ViL/ AJ ~ 3 ~ - MEM0RA NDUM ~ s0 o~~ T0: Spokane County Pl anni ng - Pre1 imi nary Pl ats C' FROM: Spokane County Uti 1 i ti es DATE : 8 SUBJECT: SEVis1LtLrN -.fd (,$ftpws) pF•132Z.-79 Recommendations are as circled. lO An on-site sewage system be allowecl under the rules and regula- tions of the Spokane County Health District and subject to speci- fic application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer. 0 The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest legal assessments for any utility local imnrovenient district to provide central sewerage service to this property. U3 Water service shall be provided by 4094111Ab AvffAiaE' tRRJ447/0" in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. (3a) Water service shall be coordinated with _ in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. (4) There are no recommendations concerning the method of sewage dis- pesal as the project is outside of the 201 sewer study area. (5) Water service as approved by Spokane County Nealth District and/or Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. (6) Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for cunnection to future area-wide collection systein. (7) A dry sewer connection to the tutur-e North Spokane Seweraye System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Depart- ment prior to construction. (8) Located within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not witliin any purveyor's district. May be serviced by an individual well owned and operated by lot owner. (9) (10) ' "z".~.. w.u ....y,~dtK~••-iwr'dt~o„`..*.ui1N[N'~ -s~v t • . 1~f~ . ' - ~ ~ OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON Dote ~u ~ , 19~~ Inter-offico Communication To s2okane ~ounty Planni ~ r ) • ~~~c~t , from Coullty Ensineex's DeNartment Q _ e V ~2 ~ E ti d • . sub;,ct P E S 1'he above reEerenced plat has beeci sctieduled far an "Extension of Tiwe Hearing" on A ` ~ ~g , ly~~ . The County Engineer's DepartmenC has reviewed ~~J the plat and finds that the "Cuuditions for Approval" which wore required by the Spokaae County Hearing Examiner and/or the BoarJ of County Commiseionera are still epplicable and should be required bs a condition in granting [he extension of time. Form 327-C R ' Y~dIS5~E11CAll~~! Title iiisuranco Cornpany 7itle Insurance Services North 720 Argonne Road ~ ~ - Spokane, Washington 99 ~3Q1 . (509) 922-2222 ~ R . ~ E C E FV _ ND J U L 2 B 1980 SECO CERTIFICATE Tn PLAT SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Order No. • 102401-M Cer.tificate for riling Proposed Plat of SEVERIEN-JO ADDITION - Spokane County P1 ann ing Comini s s ion N. 721 Jefferson Spolcane, tJashington Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submitted for your apnroval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the 1-ecords of the Clerlc of the tlnited States Courts holding term.s in said CUUnty, and from such examination hereby certifies ttlat the title ro the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: Tract- 35 of ORCHARD AVENUE A.DDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Valume "11" of F'lats, page 24; EXCF.PT the East 70.56 feet of the South 158.62 feet thereof; Situate in the County of Spok ane, State of Washington. VESTED IN : JESS S. BROOKS and EDITH I. BROOKS, husband and w? fe ; EXCEPTI4NS: ' l. Liability to assessments levied by Orchard AvEnue Irrigation District No. 6. 2. Restrictive covenanta conraineci in hlarrnnty Deed from Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dietrict No. 6, Gxatitoi• to Clarence HoFward Fiarmon end Cenevieve Harmon,, husband and wife, Grantees, filed September 30, 1943, ai; BocumenC No. 599338A, ae follcws: Any garage, barn or other outbuilding constructed upon said tracC shall be aet baclc at 1e:3st eighty feet from the front street line of eaid tract and shall be proaptly completed and pminted, and that the dwelling hause, when constructed= 8ha11 be net bFick at lenar thirty-five feet from such street line, excepr in case where they may be seC cloeer to correspond with other dwellinge previou8ly built nn said etreeC. • ( con tinue d) r _ ~ ...-.wca . _ ' . F~ -ra~ - i . i~ S • t ..~yy .i s r3MA~nK15~f .i.j~~ i~ v N ~ SECOND CERTIF kTE TO PLAT ~ Page 2 Order No. 102401-M 3. EASF.24ENT, INCLUDING 'I'}iE TF.1tMS AND GoNUZTIOIVS TliEREZN: Grantors : Ji=ss S. Brooka and Eciith I. Brooks, hueband sizd wife T'ize Wsfihingtoiz Water Power Company, a L ~ Granter: cnrporation Purpoae : ELectrical distriUution line over Tract 35, Location : except the Easr 70.56 feet of the Sourh 158.62 teet, with the right to in~spect said 1 ine Ai1d remove bru8h and treee Dated: 4ctober 29, 1947 Recorded: Novembex 7, 1947 Documenr No.: 782903A Af f ee te : Tne Wee t line of the $bvve described property. 4. DEEn OF TRUS'I' ATJD THE TERt7S ArdD CONDITIONS THEREOF : Grantor : Jess S. Brooks and Eciitll I. Brooks, husband and wife Tr_ustee: Transamerica Title Insurance Comoany L'enEficiary : Pacific Firs t Federal Savings and Loan Association a corporation Amo un t: $64,800.00 Dated: August 24, 1979 Recorded: SeptembEr 28, 1979 Recording No. . 7909230279 5. MATEI2ZAL AND/OR LABOR LIE11: Claimant: Warehouse Carpets, Inc., a Glashington corporation Against : Russell Brooks and Jane Uoe Brooks, husband and wife and R. A. Hall Construction, a Washington corpor_ation Amount: $3,918.47 . • Recorded: April 30, 1980 Recording No.: 3004300253 NOTE l: General taxes for the year 1980 have been paid in full in the amount of $214.86. (Parcel No. 06543-2610) Assessments for the year 1980 have been paid in full in the amoun.t of $69.00 to Orcr.arcl Avenue Irrigation DistricL r?o. 6. Records exarnined to June 3, 1980 at D: 00 A. r1. TR.AtJSAt~ ~ E~l1 ~ r C, ~ Ol'IPANY BJ. . f rlik~' Hare cc : Spokane County Engineers • cc: Simpson Er.Gr-s mw PRELI NiNARY PLA`I' G.YTENSICN OF '"Il41E rCRI4 P1at Number: PE-1322-79 Plat :vame: Brooks Addition Number of Lots : Number of Acres : ~ Sponsor: ~ Property Owner: . Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Phone No : -A 00 Phone No : Engi neer/SurveL;or : Address : •--r- Ci~y, State, ZiA• 1 P h o ne .N o. * * PHASED PROJECT _ ~ . (TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF 2'HE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED A.ND FINALI ZED IN ~ PNASES OR STAGES) ~Vumber of lots or.iginalZ y approved : Number of p,hases finalized to date: Number of lots finalized to date: Nunber of lots remain.zng to be finalized: x ~h Number of acres remaining: Legal description of property renraining to be developed and finalized *(Flease be sure that the 1egaZ description excludes a11 phases that ~ have been finalized) : ~ • * ~ t * * * t * * ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ * ~ ~ * * ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ,t * ~ * * * ~ * ~ P . _Pd`. E ' d C c3 t t ~or i;n3 i 1. Z 1*1 z icEiv E ID - oVE;R - Il,~L2~198Q - SPOKANE co" TM-NT PLANNING DEPAR . r . , Briefly summarize the proqress, made to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e. physical constrvction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishinq various departmental re- quirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.) ~ ~..~i1~L,p ~ : ~S"~ • , ~ ~ l~~_~ 1 C,~~ ~ . ~ ~~-T c-~ r ~-P ~r u S e' ~ Briefly state the reasons the plat nas not been finalized and/or whu the plat wi13 require an Extension of Time (i.e. current or past problems, delays or setbacks that may have sZowed progress, economic considerations, difficulty meeting departmental requirements, etc.): . "I:~ L' V.QP..~-:,~.~ c ~Q\~,~' - ~ ~ f N ; Signed • _ p ns r/, wner/En ineer/Surveyor ~ Da te . UA - 2 - i ~ l V f 4 ~ t ~ 90 ~ ECEIP`' Dcite 29 19 ~ ~ Received From cTt~2-,A~ _ r~oilars$ ~ ~ For_ ~J\jA,~~ ~ PAI~ ~~'O1~RiVE CO',7I~i''Y PL~I'~~it~G DE~''~'IOI.~`,~1T a I nCcauNr HaW ~ ~ AMi JP CA5H AcCouNr ~ I ~ ` G~l~hT RA1D CNECK ~ ~ eF1lRP1GE J~fs4h1EV'F~ ~ 4.]y^_ DUE ~ $k{80a5 ~ I I t. 1 r „ .y N ~ t 1 ` ' J li~~._1J~ 16~Y ~/~'.tl✓~ ~ `,r~ ~ \ o 1~ ~`~~1J'~.17ulL% ` .~iL~i ~ ~ ~ ~v' d PLAIVNING DEPARTMENT " ~ 4 ~f ,r.~~` ~ ~ • eROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET • i ~ . , , 1 ~,st~-_ , , ~ ' f , • PNONE 456-2205 , SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOK4NE COUNTY GOURT FiOU$E J u n e 27 , I9V O John B. Byers Pl 408 Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 Re: Extensions of Time for PE-1322-79, Brooks Addition and PE-1323-79, Bayes Addit7on Dear Mr. Byers : Our files indicate that the conditional approval on your preliiiiinary pl ats , known as Brooks and Bayes Addi ti on respecti vely, vri 1 1 expi re on September 1, 1980. The Heari ng Exami ner Comnli ttee rnust consi der and approve, in a public hearing, an application for an Extension of Time if your preliminary plats areto remain active. The Committee may attach additional conditions to the plat during the public hearing. In order to process an Extension of Time, vle request that you complete the attached forms and return i t no later than July 25, 1980. A fee of $75.00 for each extension, payable to the Spolcane County Treasurer, must accompany your application to cover the cost of the public hearing. If I can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ~ Steve Horobiowski Subdivision Administrator Enclosure SH/dj CC: Charles E. Simpson PJ 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 r Pacific Northwest Bell North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 July 11, 1980 Spokane County Planning Department 721 North Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: Severien-Jo Addition Gentlemen: Pacific Northwest Bell will not require Utility easements within the finale plat of the Severien Addition. Very truly yours, G. D. Fleming Right of Way Agent ccs Clarence E. Simpson Engr. Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99206 ~ ~ C jr .P Fp~R1 . ' wwP311s aEV. e.73 . • ` . ' g ,j~ _ _ - - . . . . ' ' , ' • ~l(~- . . •r~ "'•r-~';~ti _ . , < , , (c. , s~~~~~ I , ' , Y/. '~ras.'-~as:. ~ , _ , ~ . . . . . " ' - 4/ v • _ • .vr - ,s . ~ . • . • . . ~ , , • THE WASHINGTON. WATER POWERC4MPANY .81eapaC and i'~V'a$QbrCd.l Gctds .5e9'a•icQ " • . P.O. BOX 3727• SPOKANE,, WASHINGTON 992200(509) '469•0500• . July ll9 1930 JUL-1` ~ 19,5 : . . ~ . V~ . 0 . . , sPaKANE coUNrr PLANN1fVG DEPqRT1WFNT ' , ~ Mr. Chuck Simpsan Clarence E. Simpson Engiaeere ~ North 909 Argonne ltoad . . . . ~ . ~ . spokana, Waehington 99206 Re:, Severien-Jo. Addition ' _ . . . , . , ~ Dea,r Mr: Simpeon t Our eagineere have reviewed eubject preliminary plat aad have . seceztained that the streets.ae ehaum witl prove adequate to aceomuaodate . our Company~ s utility f8ciliti,es. _ ~ . ~ Thia ie made poseible by egieting easemeate along ChQ property line ~ _ between Tracts,34 ead 35 of Orchard.Ave,nue ,Addition. The eaeemente invqlved are filed uader Audi,tor's Document Nus. 782903A, 752906A,,. end 782908A. - . ~ . . . ~ . very cruly'yours,. ~ . ~ Richard Muf fett Rights of Way 3upervieor ~ , RK:mh . CC: Spokaae Couaty Planning Commniesiono S E R V I N G T H E I N L A N 0 E M P I R E 0 1 W A S H I N G T 0 N- A N D' 1 D A H 0 ' C' - RE4\!CE E. SIMPSOi`! ENGI~~r INC. CIVIL ENGlNEERS AND ! AND SURVEv ORS N. 909 Rrgonne Road Spolcana, Washington 99206 Telephone: 926-1322 F 1 C ' . ~ SUBJECT tE -2-°L --7 1 - DATE: ~ ~ ~o +G C' tr z. ~ ! t L~ r.~.~► l~ ~1 ~ r~ ~ ~ ~t .S ~ it tr I < ! a 1--:~~4~~ PE 1 3Z2.--7 9 ~ y ~ ~ ~ v T ~ 7! jb/80 ; i r-~ ~ ' , E ~ a ~ _ .A t' 11 61~ ~ p,~~~JOG PL S i ~ a c~ri ~ CL! -NCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEE( NC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road , Spokane, Woshington 99206 • TelePhone:926-1322 r TO : ~ _zs~ _ co Pi-, m'l S Q o•, / SUBJECT: :-r DATE: -7 c- CA, A '!~L s d pi-~ 'C'v r . ~ _ I1 C" ~ Signed if anYaUOUeri9Ja aSaniC..Title Insurance Company Title insurance Services North 720 Argonne Road ! umett gima Spokane, Washingtr 206 (509) 922-2222 I V E CERT I F 7 CA'TE Tn PLAT JUN 1 0 1980 SPOKANE COUNTY , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Order vo.: 102401-M Certif_icate for Filing Proposed Plat of BROOKS ADDITION Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spolcane, Washington GentlemPn: In the matter of the Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditar and County Clezk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records af the Clerlc of the United States Courts holding terrls in said Caunty, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the f_o11owing described land situate in Spokane Couizty, to-wit: Tract 35 of ORCHARD AVENUE ADDLTION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, p age 24; EXCEPT the Fast 70.56 feet of the South 158.62 feet thereof; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN : JESS S. BRQOKS and EDITH I. BROOKS, husband and wi.fe ; EXCEPTIONS: ' l. Liability to assessments levied by Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No. 6. 2. Reetrictive cover.,ants contained in WAxranty Deed froan Orchaxd Avenue Irrig&tia:: District Nn. 68 Grantor to Ciarence Hawaxd Hazman and Genevicvc liarmanD husband snd wife, Gx°antees, fi].ed September 30, 194'j, all Documene No. 599338A, ae rollaws; Anp garage, barn ~t -nrher outbui lding cone truc ted upon sai.d tract ahall be set bAc:k at legst eighty feet from the front street line of seid tract and shall be pronptlq corrpleted snd painted, artd that the dwelling house 9when cons[ructed, shall be set back at. ZeAst ¢rhirry«five feet from such Btreet line, eKCept in case where they may be Eet cloaer to correspond wfth other dwe Llinge previcaus1y built om said e treet. • (continued) - - •-----r r , . . ..im.r. - .-.»-......'..~-~7Nns..~-,-q~m +fliAi7~ry3w ^.^AS'xr.'-~i:'a.^'ri«`r °'~t e.. x-i,t ' _ _ ' nri.• . A l . ~ds~Ff7~ 1 b ~ " P age 2 Order ?10 . 102401-M 3• EASEMENT, IHG'LITDING T'HE TERMS AND COATDITIONS iHElREIN: . Grantors : Jess S. Bxnoks and Edith 1. Brooks, huaband ei-td wife Grantee: , T9» Washington 6Jater Power Oampany, a corporation Purpoae: Electrical disrribution line•over Tract 35, Location: except the East 70.56 feer of the South 158.62 feet, wi.th the right to imspect ssid line and remvve brush and trees Dated: October 29, 1947 Recogdeei : November 7 e 1947 Docus~ent No.: 782903A Affecte : 1he West line of the abave described propertyQ 4. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERrIS AND CONDITIONS ''rHEREOF : Grantor : Jess S. Brooks and Edith I. Brooks, lzusband and wi fe Trustee : Transamerica Titl_e In.surance Cornpany Beneficiary: Pacific First Federal Sav'~ngs and Loan Association, a corporation Amount: $64,800.00 Dated: August 24, 1979 Recorded: September 28, 1979 Recording No. : i 909230279 5. 14ATERIAL AND/4K LABnR LIErd : Claimant: Warehouse Carpets, Inc., a Washington corporation Against : Russell Brooks and Jane Doe Brooks, husband arid wife and R. A. Hall Cons truction, aWashington cu1-poration Amount: $3,918.47 Recorded- April 30, 1980 Recording No.: 3004300253 NOTE l: General taxec f3r the year 1980 have bec-zi paid in full in the amount of $214.$6. (Parcel No. 06543-2610) Assessments for the year 1980 have been paid in full in thF amount of $69.00 to Orchard Avenue Irrigation District No. 6. Records examined to June 3, 1980 at :00 A.M. TRY~TISAZ~ E 11,COl'IPANY ~ ~ - ~ By : ~ Mik ' Hare ~ cc : Spokane Cmunty EnginPers cc : Simpson EnginPers nu ri ~r''~► 4~~ 1 , a•/ •J o~''~' .O ~ _ _ . ~ v • - - - - ' _ .S: S/ •1_~ • ~ B . . _ rt- ? e y J .i- q • ~ ' Q~ ' ~~J ~ ~ ~ e~ • ✓ A `S^,~` ~ '1. r~ ~ ' ° ~ \ , • ~7', s ~ ' / • ' r ~ i V All B~ ~ ♦ . ~~'3' . ~o ~ ~..rJ ~ ~Q 3 90, ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ 1 A ~ E . ~ , ~ ~/1 . p " 6 • 40- ~ 1 \~J ` I ~'c►ri ~ 1_ ~ ~ ~ v : ~ ~ ! ~ ~ .1 ~J► f f Y ~ h( J J1. ~ ~ `ftj C ! _ ~ , . c-~- ~Z i ~ • 0,. ~ , &31 N 1, ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ' , • . ~ , , , A a'~ ~ "W` , ['C'r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~J, I ~ u ~ D 1 ~ ' t ' :a • ~ C r I , ~ ' I~ i . , ~ ~ ,.~r` ~ ~ 'q. l ~ ~,1/ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ y,. , ~ ~ • ' i1 ' ` J ~ t ~ 1,,_ ♦Y Lr ~M1~~r I ~ ~ i - - - - ~ ~ II• - t t,~ - ' , 7k ='t ' O • ~ ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ y I _ j ~ I, ~ ' / + ~ ~ ~ / / '~`f, t ' ~ ~ • ( ~ , . ' ~ ~ E ' ` , ' ~ • ~ ' F i r, ' } ''j~ ~c ~ • . ~ ~7 ~ ~ J ~'tl ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ',I' ~ ~ / ~ I ~ ~w I~♦ ts ' V.&.- - v ~ c 25 b (.P 1 ► ' ~ ~ , ~ ^ 1 1 ~ . I , N~ 27, ►l~ , , c~ ~ 4 14 A ~ ~ u ~ • _ , _A . .~."~a L E- ._c.._ _ . .11 'L_ J' ~ p I ~ ~i ~ fl I , a., n QS _ Qj1 r~_,'~ ~ d t! ...~1~ _ -e~-~-- • ~ ~t _ ~ _~a~ ~ , ~ ~ - - - - e ~ ~ ~ C..~ ; i ~ T ; ~ _ / , , • ~ , ~ i ~ fi ' 1b ~ ~ ~ +t ~ ~ ~ r ~ .1 ,c, n `S ~ i ~n ~ ~ ~ v~ ,f - • .-s,___ ~ .L. 1 ~ rso 7~ A / Q 1 . y~ . _ Fj,2 A3 f ~ G~~~~a` ~ ' ~l i ~l~~' •I, ~ ~f . ~ b;f ( i'R RN SA~1,*, E;?fCA If1LL CGN'f'AVY o - NCR1 N 770 ~ SrOK~rvE, w~Nf~J01 A L ~Q `o-A lry ~ ~ h t~' ~ J ~ w _ G 7f ; s ~l1~S pi.n~ ,5 rt'~. • ~O~f~• +p, ~~r p~.~~JS!' a~ lss~shrg ~ ~ i;.y~ t/i~ INj~ ~ ~ ~ 1h \g . ~ •~n f U~ i e. i(11" Ilb ( 'C♦ 71 I . . ~ - ' . ' - 'I,, ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ - -T ~ N J ~ ~ • ' _ ~ , - ,1 .-.e.. . . ~~~w»~s i. MO 1t~ ai~ ~~'SY'~ ^4~t~ ~ File # 1z-?15 , $"cate-S .r4-Q D ! 771 a Sec. ~ T'sh'p ~?.,S' R'ge ~ ~ 4:••~. Classification ~ • Proponent ~..r- . . ;14S T H R E 5 H O L O D E T E R M I N A T I O N Proposed F:-f ,cA tr DECLARATION OF Nonsigni ficance 7 1 ( proposed/f inal ) ( signif icance/non-significance ) 1. Uescription of Proposal :..3 SUBpt 1Jl5 /o ~t.l .~5r.,t1► 64,E_~'~4 2. P ropo n en t : T4 .3 . B vE w_.y.S r 3. Contact Person : Phone: 4. County Actian( s) Requested : Zone Change Preliminary Plat ; Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other : 5. Location af Proposal: tl~*e- , 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to NOT have a signiticant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is NOT required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). Thi s decision was made after review by the County of a completed environaiental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. , , 7. Responsibie Official: Hr•oposed Ueclaration : Final Declaration : Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name - ~ Siynalure Signature ~ Title Director Title Chairman Depdrtment Spo. Co. Planni ng Dept. Department Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee Uate August 15, 1979 Date August 30, 1979 Revised 6/1/79 I '1 . , 8. For Declar•ation of Significance Oniy: Date of Expected Draft EIS Available (determined by Responsible Officiai ) Date of I ssuance , TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmentat impacts leading to such declaration. b. 6rief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact ot the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of non-signiflcance. ~ 1r+~ •.~~~G _ ~ • i' ~ h"A;l'~~`~'t~~! . ~ WfI ~~~yq~~` ? ,r~•:;s.~ ~ '0! - ~ ei -4 ~ ~ r~ A. " No. PE-1322-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on August 30, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, John B. 6yers, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, PE-1322-79, Brooks Addition for subdivision of .8 acres into 3 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: JOHN B. BYERS C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been compl ied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of Che Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 1 ' No. PE-1322-79 6. That the laricl in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: . That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or atfiached sheets as noted. 2 That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. ~/That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or , deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries. ) That appropriate street names be indicated. ~ That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. • 2 ~ No. PE-1322-79 6. T at the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire rotection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 3 r No. PE-1322-79 ~ ~ That the p'reliminary plat be given conditional approval to September 1 ,.-1980 . /9That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline , and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that atl improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4 n No. P E-1322-79 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 15. All construction within the public right of way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. ,,0400100,That a name be indicated before the final Plat is filed, • such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage ~ disposal systems. 18.~ Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions ~ That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to ~ 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. . That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 5 ► ; No. PE-1322-79 That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 22. That a public water system serviced by Orchard Avenue Irrigation District #6, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 23. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. . That the plat dedication contain the statement: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 25. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 26. Dedication of 8 feet additional right of way along Ella Road and Glass Avenue. f~27. That the owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest an R I D or CRP on Ella and Glass to comply with County paving policy. 28. Sponsor to provide a written statement to Health District and Planning ~ Department relative to the placements of the sewage disposal system on Lot 3 of the plat. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of John B. Byers for a preliminary plat as described in the appl ication should be approved. . 6 e No. PE-1322-79 Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCoury Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE , Chairman ; J t~ L=~ l!' • ~ ~:I- ~o~ • j ATT EST : FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director B y : 7 ~ . a At:kN(:Y KE~~~(MyE QAZ'~ ; r _ . _ - . _ _ _ - • - - - - - - - ro: . t•KuN• Nwu►~: _..~~_o _ e r _ ~ . , ~ 4 Ab.: y _.~.,Q'.Q. _..~►~C ,E~ c o ~ ~.r Ms • /o~g 1 HAVt KEV t k:ldku 't'liL_ AND: Ug! S - r'L15 WA'1'Ek OUAl.l'l'Y h'ur ANpruvel lteyulrrd i. 5CI)Lte tutik W/ 17 .S04 G. P. D. ur SO or s,ro rnrvlcues ~2. Mech.sn/cal aydtes uc laguon W/3500 G.P.p9 ur 20 ur puco aufvJcu,-. 3. Cuuunurc: ial ur indudtrial facillty. 4. Nt'uk:S t'ut-w1 t requi ccd SLatr Peruilt reyulred ~ t:. t:~.W. l. 1'r~:~,~~.►t lun K~yu~at~d U.__,T`~k.~~v 1 ~~,~►u~4ul ~ 1 l:huclc l 1 b t Keyuestud Watut i1ua! I t y 5t:,iiJ.~sJy MudiFlcdtiun Kcyulcead api, i tc,,ait 'I't, ur Nuc t r tuJ 000000Nv l:omius:i►t _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - il . II~:I w 1 l~~1 l:~►~buivtil t3 Al la~~ I~asJ Al lt ilUAl.l't'Y (I i► Cutiiil lra ut ltkr i5dtcl lUA) A. NuL1 CL: 01 l:ul►yt ['iu: l imi Kc:yut ruJ ~ U. I'ctiii1 l Kvqu t t•:4l l.: . I1~ t•~ i! ~J 1:~~~uactt t y A L ia.• IwJ Sul.l•: 5OUkt:L (1:1'A A. W1LI4Iii Aqoltuc (ltvchbrbv 'luiir) . It.:vtcw Ap`,caru N`cvuedcy C. Witlitit Streaititluw Zuua ~ s ~ . , , . . tV~ r1MyYJ 1. JIJ. 1 7/ ~ 144h•IbAkcrl) YY i :~.L .i .G :...L~S...... ~G:•=.~ FIJ3L.iC ':;`7,7IM:G _ 4=lication Yio. E?L- - 1322 --71 App1_ca-zit _ 1G / . Ir AVOR OpFOJI^_'IC~T :;2 Lb o~.: :•r_sh to TE-ST= at t:z::.3 (C11QCk G::e) w vi5 . ~ ?10 Iia-me (?lezse ?ri.*~t) _ ~o~v ~.-~~r=tz~ K~~nv S 3 ( . . . 5POKANE VALLE(I FIRE DE--)ARTIAENT s&Iavz& 7"le- An, / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 August 21, 1979 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Pl anning Di rector Spokane County Planning Commission N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Dayharsh : The follotiving Zone Change has been reviewed for fire protection: OPE-1322- 79 Byers Brooks Addi ti on PN-1323- 79 Bayes Addi ti o n _ PE-1324-79 Mission Vista PE-1325-79 Gordon Curry Evergreen South PE-1326-79 Gordon Curry Hager' s East Val 1 ey Pl at The above need mains and hydrants to be installed. Access plans for firefiqhting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. /Al`Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn R E C E I V E AU G 2 w 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNtNG DEPARTMENT ~PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES J RGENDA, August 30, 1979 TELEPHDrdE. 456-2205 ~~1B~IyISI~1~ I~E.~4R~~C~ E~~~II~E~ CQMh9~TTEE S~PO1~NE COUNT~( PLACJI~I~IG 1 III3Gs . Tfluf sday} A17guJ1+ 30, 1979 " 9■00 A.M. Pl ace : 8raadwa,y Centre Bui 1 d i ng ,2nd F 1oor N 721 Jefferson, 5pvkane 9:00 A.M. Discussion - PE-1311-79, JAN`S ADDITIQN - Clarification af Engineering conditians as appraved by the Hearting Examiner's Findings & Order fvr the June 28th, 1979 Agenda item. - PAGE A. PRELI1~INARY SU6DIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME 1. PE-1011-76, SWAN ACRES 15T ADDIT~ON ZE-59-16, Agricul tural to R--1 SWAil r w • • + . • r a ■ ■ • s • + ■ • s s • s 1 2. PE-11$8-782 PACE ADDITION ZE-58R78, Agricultural to R-I ~ROSiJ 1 . • • a • • . + . s • ■ • • • • a • • • F 3. PN-1189-78, NORTH PAR1C INDUSTRIAL ADDI~ION ZN"57-785 MdIIUfaC 4.Lir1T7g to ReS LY'iCted l ndLI~tridl MccoRMACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. PS-7198-753 LARS4N ESTATES 1ST ADDITION Z5-82-78, Agri cultural to R-I 1.+OF~ST` • . r . a a + • s 1 } a • r s • + . • r ~T B. PRELIMIhdARY SUBDIUISIONS AND ZO1dE RECLASSIFICATIQNS 5. PE-i 322-T9, BROQKS ADDITION B4 E1\S • t • + . . . s • ■ . w • . • • • . . e . 5 6. PE-1323-799 SAYES ADDITION BYERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . 6 7. PE41324-799 MI5SI0N VISTA 2E-181-79, Agri cul tur°al to Residential Mobi 1 e Home GUTHRIE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 7 S, PE-1325-79, EVERGREEN SOUTH 2E-153-79, Agricultural to R-I ~y CAJ RR1 . . . . . • s . s . • a ■ r • . . r • • • V 12.00 Noon LUNCFk (Place to he announced at Heariflg) i • ti+L/ 1 •M• 1l4CO1•VE1{E ~ C. FREL IMINARY SUBDIV IS IQNS AND ZDNE RECLASSY FICAT IQNS 1. PE-1326-79, HAGER`S EAST 11ALLEY PLAT ZE-184-79, Agricultural to R-I CURRY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2. PN--l 327-79, FLETCHER REPLAT ZN-185--79, Res i denti aj Mobi 1e Nome to Res i denti al Mobi le Hame or R-2 MEYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3. PN- I G71-7O y CHA] l riR1V T l'lEADIJWJ ZN-34-795 Agri cultural to Agri cul tural Suburban or R-I McKINI..EY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 0 b O O o a 4 0 o a ~ O o G 4 ^~C Ir t ~k 4 'k 5k ~r Y k ~r 71[ ~C k * ~ . AGEfVDA, August 30, 1979 TELEPHOPJE: 456-2205 SPOKAfdE COUNTY PLANNI('JG SUBDIVISIOP! HEARING EXAMINER COIIIIPIITTEE TIME: Thursday, August 30, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item 7#5 on Plorning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMIPJARY SUBDIVISIOfd PE-1322-79, BROOKS ADDITION a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on the iJ6v' corner of the i ntersecti on of G1 ass Avenue and Ella Road b. Legal Description: Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, except the east 70.56 ft. of the south 158.62 ft, loca ted in Section 6. c. Sponsor: John B. Qyers N 408 P i nes Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Charles E. Sinpson N 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: .8 acres f. Number of Lots : 3 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dvrellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. L4ater Source: Orchard Avenue Irrigaticn District #6 j. School District: West Valley School District 1#363 k. Method of Setivage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks l. Environmental In»act: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate infornation to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act l-lAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." - 5 - r ~ 0 AV ~.NUE E~-LE'L~ 94 ~ g6 r9 92 93 I( 9D 9► ` 87 f4 00~ av ~ - 13 6 J Naa - gQ w E~~ES4 ~ r ~ e' ~ ' ~111 a ! P, 2 ro , --74 ati1A ~,y L~ flR s+ 15 10 ~ 7 ~ 6r 6g ~ ~ p, fo.' 71 7 ir~!.'. . d~ 69 w Y~ o~ Jc ~C„ ~r AdEbIL ► SeK0~~ Bov 5c0u+ G°rrlP I _j ` EL ,9K9D z , . ► ' ~ ~ v , J~'~ • OR a MAa~►wo ~ ~ 1 ` . • ~4 ► 9 48 . pKANE , R~VER ' r w ~ y _ - • ~ ' SD ' "F ~p°pM • Y Q a ~ I a Q ' ~Ls_ ► ~~ho~ 4 A',g ~p a ~rcc PpSa d P -~I uc ~ MFt ~ yiA ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦ 4 W p 1 , ~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ( - + N~ ` ~ ~ '~/y''~ y~L~ ul ~ ` , ♦ ~M./' / ? ` ' ~ ~ . r~ ~ U i+ EO 1~ ,~'~~;r, F';; ~ ~ " , , . / • . ~ ~ Uy ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~J 1~ 1 ! ~r~ ~ '~'r•",:~.' ~ G nV 1oV 4.r► Y a :i;~ . 4JC:•: ' •r.~ ~ Z .RA~ t:~:,; EY A~E I~'~ . 950 RY AvE~ ~ , r ~ Ek STAFF ANALYSIS - August 30, 1979 PE-1322-79, BROOK'S ADDITION PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on the northwest corner of the intersection of Glass Avenue and Ella Road. B. Proposal - .8 acres subdivided into 3 lots for single family use - Lot frontage = Varies from 70.5 feet to 80 feet - Lot size = 11,200 sq. ft. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses The proposal is surrounded by single family dwellings on lots ranging in size from 46,500 sq. ft. or 1.06 acres (which is the approximate size of the originally platted lots in the area) to approximately 9,000 sq. ft. lots. The division of these older larger platted lots occurred through segregations. Most of the older platted lots have been segregated into 3 to 4 smaller lots for single family dwellings. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The land use and lot sizes appear to be compatible with existing uses and lot sizes in the area. II. SPECIAI, INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and accepts the circulation with added conditions of 8 feet dedication and RID or CRP requirements on Ella and Glass Avenue. B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis- posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant`s engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. ~ - 5 6 - _ STAF'F ANALYSIS - August 30, 1979 _.,~OOK' SADDITION - continued The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following commeats: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 3 lots on .8 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its indivldual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are know7n to react w7ith soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundw=ater background of 155 mg/l. 'rhe forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.3 to 1.5 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.4 to 1.6 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. C. Drainage The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant lndicates that on-site storm drain3ge provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health Dxstrict prior to the final plat filing. cr STt1FF 4i~tALYSIS - August 3n. 1979 , BROOK' SADDITIOV - continued D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Orchard Avenue Irrigation District #6. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Frre Protection District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to revlew and approve final fire flows and water plans. F. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of West Valley School Dlstrict #363. G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that the neighborhood park ultimately needed to survice the area would be in the vicinity of the Orchard Center Elementary School of 7.0 acres in size. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural P.esources None have been indentified. III. ZOVING ANALYSIS The sponsor is not requesting a zone change. The site is currently zoned Agricultural Suburban as is all surrounding property in the area. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. I Slight adverse envzronmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services and utilities. The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other ageacies of jurisdiction. - SD - • STE1FF ANALYSIS - August 30 979 OOK' S ADD.LTION - continued V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indzcated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the flnal plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and flre protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and wlll adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provlde for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planniag Department prior to the filing of the final plat. -5E- • STAFF ANALYSIS - August 30, 1979 - BROOK'S ~DDITION - continued 8. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to September 1, 1980. 9. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or anv approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. N0TE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WaC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is glven subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction.and the filing of a final plat. 12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have beea replaced. 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of 6Jay until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Englneer. 15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 16. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County assessor and the Planning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. 18. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies w7ithin the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions 19. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant wlthin thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. - 5 F - T J STAFF ANALYSZS - August 30 979 OOK'S ADDITION - continued 20. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 21. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 22. That a public water system serviced by Orchard Avenue Irrigation District #6, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 23. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 24. That the plat dedication contain the statement: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 25. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 26. Dedication of 8 feet additional right of way along Ella Road and Glass Avenue. 27. That the owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest an RID or CRP on Ella and Glass to comply with County paving policy. - 5 G - OFFICVt OF COUNTY ENGIN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote 4u? w s_T / S , 19 7 9 Inter-office Communicotion To PLANNING UEPARTMENT f rom GARY KENNALY „ PLANN ING & TRFiFF IC DN IS ION ENG IO;ER a Subject ROAD CONDITIONS * FOR PLA.T P,E !392. S roo k S Actcl• *CONDIT IONS C IRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONS ILIERAT ION • - - 4..PUBLYd ROAD STANDARD. - - - PRNATE ROAD STANDARDS - - - tAthat conditional approval of the plet is given aub ject to dedication of Right of Way and approval of the road eyatem in the plat by the County Engineer; E~that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed etreet centerline and curb gradee be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of 8 final plat; (D3 that drainage plans and design calculatione showing the gradea and 811gnment of drainage facilities be aubmitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the f il ing of a f inal plat; Q-conatruction within the proposed public streete end easemente shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licenaed land surveyor, who shall be reaponaible for perpetuating ell evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be dieturbed during construction and who ahall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plana and a certificate in writing that all improvemente Were installed to the lines and gradea ahown on the approved construction plana nnd thet all diaturbed monumenta have been reRIfLced; (O>no construction work ia to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a permit has been iaeued by the CouAty Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer; aall construction within the Public R.ight of Way, is to be completed prior to filing the f inal plat or e bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "Ae Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines ehall be filed with the County Engineer; E 7-no direct accesa from lots to 1/2 Right of Waya until auch roads Qre conetructed to County Standarde and establiahed ae County Roads; E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connectiona until auch roade are conetructed to County Standarda and eetabliehed as County Roada; E 9-road deaign, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Rights of Ways and Stub Road con- nections are the responsibility of the Developer; E10-that the sponaor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design propoeal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road interaection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the reaponsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of auch improvementa furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Hi hway Department. 8L1G 11 .AW . Existing Cotz.nty roads providing direct access to lota of the plat ehall be paved and/= curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. ' E12-Propoaed private road(s) serving lots aith: no exteneion posaible; exteneion to serve 8 or lesa lots; future pliblic Right of Way tract. E13-thet private road(s) be improved to standard adopted by the Board of County Commiaaionera., E14-no direct acceas from lots to cr(~ ► E1 -dedfcation of .Fi? hT )=16467r additional Right of Way along"a. ;1&4 16 that the owner, his grantees and asaigna agree to participate in and not oppose or proteet a n R ID fta e A G 12 Q e.i 4CZU9 v- (~L*ss m co.••ocy vir.i GvwrY Pa.~~••~ ^c. ic s/. . tl - I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1"' ~.D .I.~%~'~.~.~1'~ ~ ~ ~i 1►'''1` . ~ . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ •w-,~_ k3k4sOwA Y CtkfHE BUIII:IING N 721 lEFFENSUN '~iREcf ~~wjNE 456-2205 ' ~~L~~. SPdKANE Wl+SMIN4TAN 9926ci ~ - vs•r.-~- . . _r.. .i. .t _ r CURRENT PLANNING MEM4RANDUM j ~ iU: 1. DOE 6. School District # t Reg . Of f -r J.~ ,a t-. t v 2. Spa. Co. Hea 1 th Di st. 7. []epa-rtment of 6ame (Environmental Health) (Reg. Off) 3. DSHS S. Depaxtment of Natural-Resourees (Reg. Off) (Reg. Off) a. Fi re Di stri ct #y 9. State Parks (Qlympia) 5. Water District 10. HUD Q0 grA40-,Le-o ~0" E- .o(Reg. Off) il. F ROM : Spokane Courlty Planning Department Norlh 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Atieri[ion: Wallis D. Hubbard R E F E R ENC E: Lead Agency Desiytia tion , Threshold Deter•mination, Staff Review, Envirorimental Checklist, map; a{I or some of which are attached. Pursudnt to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a ciivision of Spokane County, has determined that the Count , as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: G 3Za.- ~ _ 2S-'~4L,• ~.~D o~s r~u ~ fT/ D•u ; S U ts : To jo-lk3 49. "e-Aej; . , 3 4J0( J ~ v {f ~S ~ Q .i/ ~~¢J /~'T • ~ ~ ~ _ /C.d T s! 2I.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `w S - r~.t.n • ~ y . 1-his determiriation was mdde in dccordance with WAC '197-10-220. ' lnt'ormation on t'ile concerriing this pr-oposed action indicates your agency to be vri AGENCY WITH Jl1RI5GICTIUN (WAC 197-10-440) (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPEkTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) ALcurdirlgty, it you wish lo exercise your- optiori to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Ueclaralion of Nonsignificance was issuecl on August 15, 1979 . Please respond, if appropriate, at your edrliest opportunily, but no later than the public hearing sctieduled torAugust 30, 1979 . I tie subj~.~ct proposdl or aclion ('(I8,) 1&-N0-T4 L4CATED WI TIiIN 1 IiE l7ESIG- NaZ ED SNOKANE vALLEY Sc7LE~4URCE AQUIFEk ANU AQIIIFER E:NViROrv- Mf NTALLY SENSITIVE AkEA AS DESIGNATEU E3Y Tt-IE SP4hANL CUUNTY 1208' '~T I )D Y . Nlease advise L,s as soon as possible as lo whether yau leel an f riviroriinenlal Impdc[ SldletYienl (EIS) or a Gr-ound Watei- ImNact Evdltidtiosi ( 114'VIl ) ',110ulcJ bc pr-epareci. f t~~lu:iirc.; hL, v . a;'( ll i`.) , A,4 F Nut 0 ELLEg1.E c 96 g4 ,e IL 19 ~ 91 92 93 (C °A~ E . ~6 NORT BQ VjELLESLE ap 6N ° ~ Q ~ ~ ' 0 Z ~ ~ L ( ~ ~ N ~ 10 ? P, k~ o ~a 1 ~d a 6~ J 1~ ~ 7L ~ 6 6 1 6 7 1•' . J 71 Cl ~ ~ . ' • * , , V ~ ut ca"nP oy 5 ~o 4 ~ z B ' s~ ! ~ ~ ` P > ` 4 ARIMGQ 1.~ 1 4;L ' J~ ~ ~ ~ - ' , ; ~ - , . _ E ~ 1 ~ 4'0 p pKa NE_ ~ ~ a 4S~ - - •i"! - a o N ~yQpM 1 Oa oc a d .,J ~ / 4 ,°c ~n gR ~ • ~ . ~ ~ • , o,~/,o ° Q Ppv , ~ m L.tBERtY • ~ 3 14 N l- 16 ci z Z N , 4 a 5 . . . r M- r • ~ C%^' Ul J ;4 EU ~ ~ ~ • ~ / •,a:'t i•, ~ ~ ir D :1:~.~~~~ , f a ~ i~ • ~ ~ ~ 10O s ~ + ~ ~4 4 : ~ P~ • ~~»':i ii' ' ~ . ~ , ►,,,i a . 4Jf,•:;:, E . , x a ,a~~ : LY , ' ?s t L19R~RY Okv r r ~ ' r KV Olt, l • ~J / . vZ ~ . • FIIe fi , - - , I.j r20 O ~ (C D171 : ~ . , ; Sec . T'sh'p ~ 5' R'9e ►i~'_,~~ _ . Classification ~ Proponent : ..6K 1i" C t,~ 4TAFF RE~TL'EW Or- EIVVTRdNMENTAL Ct4F("1CT_TST 1. Ln accordance with the Spoicane County Environmental Ocdinance 'and WAC 197-10, an Environmentnl Chacklist ha9 boea subcnitted by the applicaat or his aQant. This checsclist arLd any additionai pertinent data has iubsequen[ly been rsviewed by [he The foilowinq data bciefly describes ths pcoposal: A. Action (s) Requested: Zone Chanqa; Vreliminar-y Plat Appcoval: Final Plat Appcoval; Chanqe of Candition Other: ! B. D cription of Proposal: i~'t=~ ~Z~~ Sl Z~ . o ' d, 44 ~ i C. Locacion of ProPosal: ~'~?~n.tit i• ~ A /l.I O M II. Review of Checklis[:, A. Sliqht adverse impacts ace noted under the followinq questions: (1) ~arth (8) V Iand U9e (15) LlEnerqy . ; (2) _-L//A ic,' (9) \-ZNatural (16) L,"Utilities / Resources ✓ (3) W3ter (I0) Risk of (17) Huruan ` Upset Health (4) ~ Flo - (lI) Popul.a[ion (18) Aesthetics ~ / (5) _Faun • (12) Housinq (19) Rec, r , (6) Noi;se (13) V~Trans (20) Arcn./ ~ ~Circ. Hlst. -,zLiqht & (14) ✓Public (21) ather Glare Senrices B. Potentiall•f si c3.nt adversa impacts are noted under the followinq questlons: ReviSed Eii 1,/i9 1 ~ C. Discusston of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the esivironmpntal checklist, che stnff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially si9nificant adverse impacts and recor.imends/issues a proposad declaration of nonsignificance. 9. Concludes that there are no potentially siqnificant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the Qroposal, recommznds/issues a final declaration of nonsiqnificance. C. Concludes that potencially siqnificant adverse impacts de exist and recomrnends/issues a declaration of 'ignificance. IV. Staff inember( s) revi ewi ng checicl i st • _~~L~""'I . , . w . - hma= U,~D mz= 'R . ECEIVE -''~j' chY(RONMEtiTAL C;_cr-,.~IST .lUN 6 1979 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY In;rQ c~ tion: The State Envirnnmental Poiir,~ Act of 1971~ Chapter a3.Z1C. RCbI, revuires all ~~al~'~ioWP~d~l agen~ies to tonslder envlronia~entai values both for thtlr own actions and when 1lcensing private proposalz. The ~ct atsa require5 that an Environnwental ia+pact Staten+er+t be prepa*ed for all aajor acLions significantty (and "adversely", as Der AAC 191-10) affectinq Che QualiLy of the physicel environment. The purFose ofi :his checklist 1s to hiep the agencies 1n- volved determine wnether or noL a proposal is such a ma,7or actton. Please ansrrer the lollowing questians as comletely as you can aith the informattan presently available to you. Piease answer questions as "yes" or "mayDe" 1f, in your ooinfon, even onTy siight impacts .rill resuit. The revie+rers o} the checklfsL will be aware uf and conctrn themselvts with the dearee oF impact, askinq you for nrore lnfonrtation, if necessary. 'orherr expianations ai your answers are reauired. ar whare you believe an exptanation weuld be helpful ta governmtnt detiston-makers, incluQe your exolanetion in the Spaca provided, ar use aodi*_ional a es, it necessarv. You should include references to any reports or studtes of ahich you are aware and vrhtO are reievant *_o the ansr+ers you provide. Comlete answers to these questions now wfil heip a11 agencfes involved with your propasal ta undertake the requtred environmental review without unnecessary delay. The folTowing questions apply to Your total propvsal. not !ust to the license far which you are currently applyinq or trte pro- oosal for which approvat fs seught. rour ansrrers should incluCs the tmpacts ++hich will be cauzed Dy your proposal r+hen it is cortQleted, even though completion may not occtir until sometlme fn the future. This will allow all of tne igencies which will !)e invoivee to complete their environrnentsl revtew nar, without duplicatlnq oapen+ork 1n the fuwre. Ma appiicatfon shall Ce processed until the checkiist has been compieted and returned to the appraprlats County department. State law ►'equir'e5 exnl3rtations for ever "o-s" and "ybe" answer ~n Che checklist. The persa+ completing the torm may be requireta to provi3e exDianacions or ' no' answers, anr~ad in soine case . more dewi"led infonnation to bid in a threshold 4etermi na t1 an. NpTE: Thts is a standard form being us*d by a11 state and lacai agencias in the State of Wasnfnqton for various types of proposals. Many af the Questlon5 :rtay not aDOly to your praposal. if a auestfon Qoes not avply, just ansker it "no" and conttnue on to the rtext question. JVVIRONMENTAL :HECKLISi FORM 1. BACKGAOUFtO t. Name af Propanent: JOHN B. f3YERS PhOtte Nuooer 922-1400 2. ACdresS of Proportent: N. 414 P I N ES RO A D , 3. Date Chetkltst SuDmitted: , d, agency Requiring CheckliSL: 5. Name af Prooaial, if Appifcable: 5. Vature and 8rief Description of tne Oroposal (incluainQ but not tian tea to its size. genera1 cos1gn eleiwts. and ocher factors tRat Nill give an accurate unden tartaing of its scope and na w re): _J Tl1r.-p 1JOJ' c11hrJ1Vi ci nn 2 Residential sinAle familv , 3 Approx. 60,000 price range i. Locatian of "osil (describe the ohysical setting ot the ProDosal, as -o+elt as tne extent of the land aree arjected by any envirormiental imaacts, incluaing any ou►er infanration needed to give are accurate ur.ae*stanaine of the snviron- mentai setting of the proposai): , Verv flat tnp1gr.aDbU, nn firQoc . Surrounded by single family residential 3. E5timi![=d Oate for COmpletion oT ttte Prnposai: ~ y arY. . 9. List at all Penmits. Licenses ar 6ovenbeent Approvals Required for the Prnposal (federal. stice and lucal - fnc'.uding ,ownes): Boa rd of ':~ounty Comm i ss i aner's aoprov i nq p I at ;:F SPAC£ FOR EAPlaNATIdN IS INtiDEdU1tTE. Pl.EASE ATTfiGH AODITI011A1 PAGES. ) 10a. Oo you. or the owner in the event you do not am the SubjeCL land, have any plans for future additlons, expansion. or further actlvlty related to or conntcted with tnls proposall It yes. expiain: "1o 10b. Do you awn or have options on land nta My or adjacent to this propasal's ;oc3ticn? :f y•s, 2XDldjn: ~1-110 111. Do you knflw af any plans by others inciud ~Q the cwner xhich may affect tr+e propert/ covered bv your propasai or land adjacent or nearby? It yes, txplain: 0 12, attnth any o Uer appiication fona that has been tompletsd recardlnq the preoasal; 1t none Aas been completad. Dut 15 expected to be filed at sane future aate, describe the nature af such apvlication farm: N'1 A II. EHVIR4tMENT,IL IMPACTS (Explanetions of atl "yes° and "mayee" answers are required) YAS Maybe NO 1. tarth. Will the proposal result in: , (a) Unstaole earth conCitions or in changes tn geologic structures? X (b) Oisruvtions, displacamencs, comaact1on or overcovering of the so112 . . . . . . . (c) Change Sn Looography or qround surface rellet featurcs? . • • . • • • - • • • x - (d) ?he oestructian. coverinq or modlfication of any unique Qeologtc X or pnysical faatures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • ;e1 Any =nc-eass in wirtd ar water erosian of soils. Either on or ot` the site? _ X ~ :r SPAGc FOR EXPLANATION IS IYAOEQt,ii',TE. PLf.;+SE ATTACH ADOl; jC`tAl PAGES. ) ':nan,es in aeposition ar erosfon of Deach sands, or CAarqes in 311tat1on. 4eposition or erosion wnith rtay rtiodtfy the channel of a river or stream X :r the bea of the ocean or any Day, 1►slet or take? SL iGNT ALTERATION I h~ GR+OUND LEVELS ARE NECESSARY DUE T4 ~.a=~~rat~on: ~ , P;T I L~DONSTRU C,'T I 0 hi , N1 I 1",1 I ti1A L, A ir, aiii :ne --ropesal -eSU+L in: 'rss 44lbe Vo ~a) Air emissions or deterioration of amient air ouatity? . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The creation of ob,jettienabte edors7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x (c) Alteratian of air mevement, moisture or temperature, or any change ct;nte, either jaSL~IGNT ~I NCxREASE I N AUTOMOB I LE I Rra. i- i 0'~ T': :xplanacion: . IF) I_ I Er1 1- (-I'I~ r•~ ~ t I •1;1 ~ t' r~, T • w4t@r. ai 17 ;h2 G+"OJOSd i"-Sul _ if:' !05 MdY~ Ka laj Change in currents. or the course or direction of water moveaents. !n elther marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x (b) Changes in absorotlon rates, drainage patters, ar the rate and ` amount of surface water runotfT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '(c) Alteratfons ta tRe coursa or tto+r ot flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` !Q) Change 1n the uiount ot surface watEf 1n any xater body? X (e) Oischarge Into surface water. or in any alteratton of Surfac• wac~- qualfty. fnctuding but not ifmfted Co temperature, dfssalvtd oxyqen or turblCity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Alteratlor► af tft dirrction or rate of flow ot qround Kacers? . ~ (q) Chanqe in che quanctty of gaund ++acers, eigher tnrouqn direC: additians or wtthdrawais, or LArough interttption of in aauiter by cuts or excavatlons? . . . . . . . . . (h) Deterioratlon 1n groul►d water qualtty. eithar throuqh direct injection, or through the see9age of leachata, phosDates. deterclents. ►.aterOerne virus or bacte+ria, or other substsnc i ntc the gound wa tet's 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . ~,cuction in *.he amount of water othenwfss availabte for X cublic water sup lies? . FW RE~SIDENTIAL ~ONSTRUCTION WITH SEPTIC TANKS ARE 'ESTIONABLE AQU i FER DETERIORATfOf; SU3JE.-"T WITH h11 N1MAL :':1PAGT. .F*.Ora. wlti the proposal result in: res Meybe No a) Change in the diversity of specles, or number of any soec!es of °Tora (incluafng trets, snrubs. qress, crops, microflara end aquatiC pldnts)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ` ?e-iuctfon of Lhe n wnDers of any unique, rare or endange*ed speties of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X :c? Intraductlon of new specfe3 of flera tnto an area, or ~ in a barrler to Che nonaal replenishoent af existing saeciesl . . . . . . 'd) Reductian in acrea ot in a tcultvral cropl ~ Explanat,eR: N E1~ CO h~S1~RUCT 1 O N wA RRA hJTS NEW ~ LA I~DS~-A P I nG'. ---MI OWAL~ IMi, P4,7T, Fauna. vI111 tne proposai resuit 1n: y,< Mavbe yp a) Changes in che diverstty ot Species. or nwber of anr species ~ 3f fauna (Ofrds, land animils incluaing reptiles, flsh ana ;ne11f1sh. Oenthic arganisars, irtsacts or aHcrofaur+a)? . . . . , . . . . . . r; ;b; ReCuction of the nuaiDers of any untqw. rare. or endan9ered speties of faunal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ z) IntroduCtian of new specits oP fauna into 3n area, or result in a barrier *.e the migration or movement of feuna? . . . . . . . . . . . . Detertoratlon ot •xfstfng fish or wilClift habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.colanation: '~0152• Y?5 -aYCt 10 i-1) kiil thc proposai increase existing noise levels' . . . . . . . . . . . . . X LxSlanatjon: idEW P.ESIDENTIAL HOUSI (dG W( LL RESULT I N '~-~L I II1-I j 17. 1. _scrt 3n,~ 31are. +es Navice vc (3) w>>> the proaosal produce neMCiAS~ ]are` . . . . X E.101anacion, SL I GNT I i~! I~: A U T O M O B I L E T R A F F R E S U L T I'.;:: I:', S! 1r~,-~-i~ ~?f~~1~E 1'. ~_1L;1RE LEVEL, MI N IMAL ih11PA.:T. . ~ • _ . ! If E:(PtANATIOt1 IS INA0EflUATE. Pl"tASE ATTrCH _ P4GES. ) 8. and U . , les 140 l a! wi 11 the proposa 1 resul t i n ttse • 1 trratt an of cne presar+c or X Exal panatiton: annea'~aAusbafi.f10TAL -FOUR -HOUSES' VIII LL' ~HiANGE LA11D US`F I N THIS AREA, VERY MINIMAL IMPACT. ' 9. Natural Resours~L. ui 11 the Droposa1 rtsul t fn: YT .'d...be, b (a) Intrfase in tlfe rita of use of any naturst reiourcasl . • . • • • • • • • • • _ (o) oeoittton of na~~ t* N~tur~E I~ES~ l1SE OF WATER~ELECTR~I~`(~Y X ~planat1on. "W ~M1Q ~ NATURAL GAS. VERY M I N iMAL IMPACT. 10. R1sk of Uoses. Ooes tho pro0osal tnvolre i resk of an exotoslon or the res~ !%Yge Ko ~ease-77 ►++zaroous substanus (inciudtnq. Dut not 1lmited to, oil, pesticidas. crgmicals, or radlatton) in :he event of an actidse+t or X uastt candl Lt ons? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exp 1 usstt on : 11. Lopulatton. yes wvoe t~ wtll cHe oroDOSaI slter tht lxatlon. 41str1butlon, dansity, or 9rowth rat* of the huwn popui+tion of an •rea? . X Lplar,acton: N EW HOUS I~~G RESU LT~) NG ~i~N ~ SL I GHT I N CREASE T P07LArM N OF AREA, VERY M I N IMAL IMPACT. ~ 12. Houstnq. Will the prooosal affetL existlrtq housinq. or Crrace a Qeoand for x addl ti ona i hous i ng? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: NEW RESIDENCESf MIN(MAL IMPACT. :3. TransoorcactonlC+rculac!on. aill :ht vrooosal result fn: res Mnvbe No ( a ) Ge:+eratt on of eadi t1 ona 1 veo1 cul ar acvsrent? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Effec:s on existinq partfn9 fuil ftles. or dawd for new perktn9? . . . . . . . . I- _ _ (c) Imact won existing tran:oortactoti systeas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Altencfons to ar'esent patterns of cirtutation or n+ovenent X . of peflple ind/or y~oods? . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Altericians ta watsroorne.rail or •irtrafflc' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Iacreasa tn tratftc hauras to notor vehlcles. X oiryclisu or xdestritns2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Exotanatton: i NCREasE I N POPULATION AND MOVEMENTI M1 N IMAL IMPACT 14. Ruolic Servlces. attl tne proposai nave in eNect uoon. or resuit Yes MaYb! Ne :n i nesc ~or aew ar aitered governmental servtc<s in any of of :fle toiiowlnq anras: ,t) Fire Protettiont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x _ ;b) ?o11ce pratettion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ ( c ) Schoo i s 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - ;el parks or other recreatlonal fatilitfes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - (e) !Rainunance 3t aubifc factlitles, tncludinq roads7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ ( t) Other governewtai servicest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Eicplanatian: NEW RES I DENCES REQU 1 RE ABOVE SERV I CESI W I TH 2-r"51 A,CRE PAR- CELS, MAYBC ON PARKS AND REC. DUE TC SI ZE - M( N IMAL IMPACT. i If SDACE FOR EXPt.J1NATIOi1 IS INAOEQUAiE, pi.EASE AraCN AOOlTI0t1A1. PA&ES. i 15. EnerU. 'at11 :he prooosal rtsult in: i~js !!avoe yo td5 Use of sucstantial awunts of fuel ar enerqy? . . • - • • • • - • • • • • • _ X (b) Oenand upon existing sources of enerqp, or reouire Y :ht atveiopment of new sourtes of ano ? . . • • • • - • • • :L.. - ~oianatlon: tJ EW RES 1 D ENCES RQU I RE ~EX I ST I NG EN ERGY SOU RES . MiNIMAL 1MPACT. 16. 'Jt!litiej. Jj11 :he oroposai resulL ~n a neea for neN sysceaa. Ies ~a„oe yo or aiterations :o che foilowing utilttles: ;a) Pa+tr or netural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - X 37 !b) Caamuniutlon systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - :tJ Wur? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x _ ,:s1 Sewer or 3e0t1C =ank57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - (e) 5tcrm water Orainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p_ - 3 . FOR EXPLi•MAT i3!1 : S :YAOEW~Jlltc . PLE15E Ar• ~ MAL PAGES. ) . . S011(i wStt and diSpoSil? . . . • • • • • • • • • ~ • X Wtanacion: ~~Ew RCSIDE(:i.ES ~'E+~U1 RE THE I~~~OVE SERVI `,ES, MI {)!IMAL I m F'A I . Yes !ayoe "o 17. sinan µesltti. W111 the proposal result in the crcation of any htalth Aazards X or' bdtan tt t i t~e~ 1 th haurti Oxt 1 uat n ta ! hea 1 tt~ ~t,~nat{~+: SLIGH~ I h;l;f~E~SE l N HEALTH HAZARDINI1"Hfi'HE 'IMREA'SE OF- TRAFFI C AND POPULATION, MI NIMAL IMPACT. 18. A,~Athattcs. w111 the proposal result ;n the oDStruttlon of any scsnic vis:a or v1ew open to ttt+ pubilc, or rtll the proposal resutt in ti+e creation of an X stELMtlcsily oif~►slvt s1te open Lo puollc vtawt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanttion: . 19. Recrotion. W111 the oro0asal rtsuit in an tavu: upon ttst qwlity or X qsantity oi exlstlnq recnattonal aflporcunltlK? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fzxplanation: , 20, A~rtneol~o iCl1/H1StOt'1Cl. aill the oro~oosal result in 3n altera:ton oi a Ves Ma bs ~O signcanc arctseoioqicat ar ntstorlul s1te. structurs. object or Duildlnq? ~lar~tton: . S 1 GRA i llRE - the .+ndersignad. ,wsar unaer the mnalty of perjury :!eat the abave rssaonses -ire rnade truthfuily ins +.o "st of .n.y knawleaSe. iilso wasrstanc nit. shoula Ustre be any riilful atsreprestntattcn or wilifiul li[k Of fult d1sclCSUre on my adr"C.SOOkArC CotMty nay withdMti any OKlaratlon Of tqnlficance :t1at it +nigllt issue tn reliance won viis chKkllst. ?ate: c_~- Y `I Prgponent: , - 7, (Pleas• Print 3r 7yca) ?rooon.nc: AdQress: ar+cme: c Person ~--oinalettng torn: 1<-~~~,~., Phone: ~(JG Oatt:~ _ 6~ - ~ , C[.~'~ L► 3eoartment or Otf~ce of tounty %vi~inq rtiecxiist: f 1 .'LaN ftwar(s) Revieainq Checfcilst: ~ . ` CL,` "ErVCE E. Sf11111PSO[o~ ENGINE IhlC. ~C1VIL EIVGINEERS AND LAfVD SURVEY RS N. 909Argonne Rvad - Spokane, Wash ingtan 99206 D Telephone; 926-1 322 ~ ' 4 y I"• _ ` ! ~ TO, SPO~~~~ ~~UNTY ,,~e_~ J t.&-..5 AWj~_ . ~ ~ ANN1 NP. !l F...RA RT SUBJECT: ~ ~ Y aATE; A, ' ~ -e- -s:s e-i C. ~ t s~~ c 1 ~ /a+c~,~ ~ ~ % 6L v~- o-V e-r-0~4 it> T-t r _ a. ~ ~ iA,-) 4L+_r c_~ i6Ld r~-f e- Am- op LrL ~ V'4- j S a / I ~~c~ 1~ S ~ ~ ~ ' _ `~~t CF ~ ~S ~ ~ .ca..y_ ~ I e~ d~~~ t~ ~C~ ~ !~'s- ~ ~ S'4 ~t ~-t~-~• iAJ c- C ~ o cd a r- 'P f P1- 4L..11 ctr_ 4a- sz-co, ej- ~ o ° i ~ Y 3 I 8Eo ° o e.a "vY e o ~ iPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Communication I V E D ri ' Date: May 22, 1979 J~,id ~ i~ly TG: kane County Planning Commission SPOKANE ~ " ~ N I NG DEPARJ e%ha~, R, s, and Eugene C. Pra er SUr3JECT: Proposed preliminary plat - Brooks Addition 1. References: a. Map of subject scale 1" = 601, by Charles Simpson, Professional Engineer, dated April 26, 1979, and received by the Spokane County Health District May 7, 1979. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Resources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Vallex, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. ~pokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. "208" Study Sampling, Environmental Health Department, December 1, 1978. . g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp May, 1979. h. Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, Soils, and Water: a. This project lies in a relatively flat area lying between Center Road and Ella Road and north of Glass Street. The west boundary extends north from Glass 320',then east to Ella 141',then south 160',then west 701,then south 158', then west 20' to join west property line. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0- 5$ slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limi-tation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked . by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. SCl;U-AGM-11 8 .Brooks Addition ~ May 22, 1979 _ Page 2 d. The data contained in the 208 study sampling indicated a total nitrogen level in the range of 1.3 to 1.6 ppm. The Orchard Avenue Water District has indicated that it is willing and able to furnish domestic use water to the plat. Satisfactory arrangements have been made with the developer. 3. Impact Discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 3 lots on .8 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of tlle impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitaiton years, subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the ground- water. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with solid particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 maximum incrementai concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural back- ground."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present i.mpact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently results of a chemical analysis show the nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.3 to 1.5 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.4 to 1.6 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. 4. Recommended that: a. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. b. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system. s Brooks Addition ~ ~ May 22, 1979 Page 3 c. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. d. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in con- formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. e. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility com- panies, County Engineer and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the sub- mittal of the final plat. . (Note: The first sentence is superfluous if the easements are shown on the preliminary map as required by Ordinance Chapters 5 and 6.) f. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." g- --DdPle e ~(~z3 / ts cc: Charles Simpson N. 909 Argonne Spokane, WA 99206 . ' . - ' , ~ og I SP 0~~~~ pEPARiMEN t p~AN i~ ECEIPT Date___~,1's~.~~,•:e.__~_~_~__19 7T 2494 4 f ; • : : (c-'ved f t z irti (kA l'S✓ ~ J .t V V ••J AV, ~Y t~t. Y ~ '2._.._.4 6 cA i ~ - ~ - ►;~)w PAID ~ ~y~ : j' ` `t._~ _~;•:~di r~ ^ t~\J, 1/A` ) ► . ~ F ~ N~ ~i ' ~ _ ~~'6~ _ T _ . ~ . . _ ~ . _ ...r ~.r.~►._ ~ 4 _ ~ ~ r ~ 6~~ ~ : Rh :~+t':t ( ~ CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARLES E SIMPSON Ulai-ence C1. SimPion engineepjy J"C. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS lZegistered m Wn.rbiuglon a»d Idalau TELEPHONE 926-1322 OFFICE N 909 ARGONNE RD, SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 APxxIL 24, 1979 PREL?MINARY PLAT BROOKS ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, Except the East 70.56 feet of the South 158.62 feet. Located in Section 6, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. in Spokane County, Washington. ' E. 0; 6" ~ I '1 957 y~~o c f J ,r `av ~ ' ~ CLARENCE E SIMPSON RICHARD L SIMPSON CHARLES E SIMPSON f` - l~~ai•erece C~- simpJon ~nyineerj, Ac. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS IZegr.ttered rn WC1JfJ11!q1011 Gl11Cj ICIlfbo agmik TELEPHOP.fE 926-1322 ECEIVE OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 R JUN 6 1979 APRIL 24, 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY BROOKS ADDITION PLANNIN6 DEPARTMENT SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATIVES FOR SEWAGE TREAZMEIVT l. Individual Septic Tanks and Drainfields 2. Mechanical Sewage Treatment Plant and Drainfield 3. Sewer Lagoon System 1. Septic Tanks - This met$od is the most cormnonly accepted practice in the Spokane Va.lley. The recent 1208' Study has indicated that recharge of the aquifer is occuring and septic tank effluent is reaching the ground wa.ter. According to the study, this recharge is having adverse impacts upon the aquifer water quality. 2. Treatment Plant - To effectively reduce the amount of pollutants that would enter the aquifer, a treatment plant would need to remove nitrates, phosphates and other contaminants that septic tanks do not remove. This advanced wastewater treatment is not economically feasible for a sma11 plant such as this plat would require. 3. La.goon - This plat doesn't have the additional land required for a lagoon. Also, the odor which may occur would be objectionable to this plat and the surrounding properties. Since the County doesn't have a comprehensive sewer plan for this area, the advanced wastewa.ter treatment option is not feasible at this time. Until such time as advanced wa.stewater treatment is offered on a large scale to this portion of the Spokane Valley, the most feasible method of sewage disposal will be with individual septic tanks and drainfields with a management system if required by your office. ~ Charle s E. S im sJv c r!~ P . 22- , R EXHIBIT A (~~I?' ECEIVEam I1IINARY PILAT APPZICATION FORM i 1,.3 a A,ivt . ALL SIGNATLTRE $IJfftS qCWiiGES ? AID 3) .''-T'JST 13E I.^i, !F APPROFRIATE, 3EFGRE IiETtTRNINIS: 10 TELr, PLAT A]DN'N!~+iSMTOR. SPOKANE COUNIY ('UINNIN(fKPAPff MENI be completed by applicant and survevor K.~ X1111 1111~ Vr1* * * fc * iM A[ t M * k k * R It ~ M k # t ~ # M f# ik * # # k M iY M k s ~t it k ti k * k # ~ k k k # Ic R s k M w R k i i# iik # Ic # # # # t► F k ik # R M iM ic # Total amount of land in ~his Subdivision: Acres ToLal ilumber af Lots Proposed densitf of the ?lat: Lots/Gress Ac=e TUtal amount of adjoin-ing land controlled by this owner or sponsor: t! Acres Proposes Use of controlled adjoina.ng land: n0 What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest f:.re station? Q Shopping faci.lities? 4 Municipal. Botzndary: Paved street or . hi ghway 0 ' LAND IISE*'"****"`'`~`*"`~"*:*~`*'fxk+Ks~#sh*##*stieR#kk**R*rsFk#~~cikFakY*+*k#*rkM#w*Rk#~~*iY*t~kM*#MYYk~#Rkis* Indicate the proposed land use of the glat: Single Family Dwell'~..nvs ( x). Duplexe6 ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-family dwelling uni.ts ( Indicate wh=ch lots: Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any noa-residential use proposed in the P1at: none What ie the present use of the property proposed to be D.latted:' vacant ( ancJ List type of uses: Cultivated iand: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres 7s kee-oing oi an.ima1.s 3e-irAd? No C X). Y?s ( Type : .:.11tZSl.'~J.''Jl'L~l~~a~~~*ty[~#!*ytt#Ic**k•M#t##~ts#i#s~#~sx~~tsia#RMRyI+M!«siR~~*xw+iM~YMM#k#MMiRMS#ttM`k*b#t#M kki Do ;•~u pla.n to file the Plat ia it;s entirety as proposed, or kill it oe 1multi-phase deve- !-)pment:' ent i rety as proposed . To what level of improvement w4?1 streets be constructed? Gravel ( Mini-mw. Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( Paved orly ( x). Describe any combir.ations of above: no street construct i on reau i red What is the time period expected fouc complete development of thA Plat: I ess than 1 year Stree t, improvements completed? n/ a . Substant:.al number of lots occupied? ail Is de3ication of a►ny land for public use contempleied? (Pa_rks, schools, etc.) No. t x Yes ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1200 3quare rzet vumber of nedrooms ~ • Estimated Sa1e Pr~ce . Will buildings be built on the lo ts befo^e they a..re scld: rlo ~ Yes ( X). Wi11 any special deed restrictions be included in tne sale oi ~ots° No Yes ( l 7 "ye s" , a xplain : Ulr~t1~~~~1#i~sk#i~~«s,.~eTraM~soM~'t#~NiIe*tks~~Mif1:#ssF#<s#s'iy:sf,c~sle~rNeeaesx►,eisye:sfsitf::s*~cr-xb-•►~ij Lfte rvopcse:i uue:,aod oi sewage ,:~~~c~ei. ~zp~~c :~.~i:~: ; . ~ ~ ; . 'I`reatment plant ( ) 0 0-ther, or combinations (Describs) Indicate the propesed source of water supply: Individual weLs ( Putlic sYstem (x )a Private community sy9tem ( Indicate method of extending ser*rice to the lots (DweLlings) : UnderLzround utility easEmsnts ( c?verhea.d utility easements ( x Utilities in streetu ~ i,Io aasemer t_- ( I:1~i1C3t£ t►1E C~iStaI1C8 IZ'OQI i.t11: u: 7-~Qii~ t'O 1:;_° II23L'~':;t E'}:? : ~y.'_1k Vvc.ter a? 7 i38 v Indic~.~? o~ ne~resc main: - _LCn~_ ~ _nV c J ~ • ~ • I E X H I B I T A PRELIMIlVARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR4 ( Continued ) Page 2 ~~***~~~~s*~***.*~****~***s********~«**r~~~*~*~*r.**~~#*~**t*x*~*****~*~~ I UTILIfiIES - (Continued) List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electr:city: WINP •Gas: wv1P Waier: OR~':HARD AVEPhone: Pi`!M 3ELL ACKNOWLID{'~IENTS.*,.,.x~****«**,~**~«*~*~*.«**~..*~.»**~,~~*«~*-..~**..~:*~«*~***~****~**x~~******~** I PROPOSID P'LAT NAME : r~ RpQ K S A D D I T I 0 i J I, the undersigaed, ha.ve completed the information requested, and the Preliminary P'lat has been prepared by me under cty supervision in accordance with the requi.rements of the Spckane County tment and the laws of the State of Washin.gt.ino . S~~ r . Q~~~~ Of WA,ry ~ (Signed) Dfit@ : ~ ci` f (Address) N. 414 ni Phoae : 9m ~ 9967 ~ 9967 Oc ~ o 'CU Spokane, WA Zip: 9920'', ~s RFOrsTEa~° S ~QXW I, thA undersigned, swear under the pen.alty o_` nEr,jU?^y that the aoove respr.ases are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear tha.t I AM 'iHE OWIVER OF PZCORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not thE owner, sttached here- with is written permission from said owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresnntation or wi13iu1 lack or full disclosure on my part, Spekane Count y withdraw any declaration ef non sign~ficance that ii might issue in reliance upo th checkl', . (Sigaed) - Date: (Address) C4 Phone : . zip: , !%'OTAR? SFA:L : 4 t ~ ilt 71t ~ ~c K 7k / M t i M ~t t ~ It ~ yc k iY iR * # # nt i # ~ tk a * ! # # It ► 't * ~ i w * ~ / k It f ~ ac R ft flt it y R aF k ~ R elt ! ~ k k 71t st 7M Ic ! M * t ic a R * ~ i s ~r ye # R yt # # s x ya ~c t ~ Paxt IZ --5o be comrleted by water pur ve yor A. '~his subdivibion (i~ (~s not) situated with;n our serv~ce areav 3. We are able (not able) and willing to supply this subdivision with adequa.te kater `'or (3omestic fire) (1.nduetriel) (commercial) usea. Satisfactory arrangesnent (have) (have not) been made to serve this prnposal.o D. Signature (only when items A, B& C are true d coatplete~l) / - - ~ L,~ C`[1 cl ,i/ ~A/ - (g:q - 44 nurveyors name signa~e and title date , ~ xF*******#*****M*»~*~***+t~s*sc**~k►****s***R***#~*sst**~+k*ai,as*#R**+k~lct*as*t*M:#s*k/~1~r*marc+t:rxss* ?art TI-t,o be comUleted 'oy Hea' th District ~cs1 Wz aist~.~ic:, ~-c,af~ !Za.s com4let,ad a field ~•res ~_gat+or. ~f the s~~a. 3. Heal th District requiremer_ts fo= -irel+.mir.ar-j plat vA ha•Te ::ct) oeen satisfiEd. C. SiSr e -.C~ ~ ~ si ganature a.nc titl e * x s fc fc # R * ! it M# * k ts yc * iM aric a 1x x F k t ~ F A tk # x * ik k k r z * s R + s ~ # # ti ~ * +Y ~ ii wt k ~t u ti it * M tM !r !M y F k R ~t * tr ~t iM ~ M M ~i It # * i # ii yt y s # x # ilc yc ~ * - - ■ ' • ~ ~ w E X ii I B I T A PREZIlMINARY PLAT APPLICATICN FORN: (Continued) ra5e j i#~t*##*Ri~~~R*t~s~#;*+~*i~~a+lt*Flsi♦c~~ur*R~t1t~*t##*~RS~**#IeiR~e~t*k#kS##=rxs*~#,a**,ersc.,~s#*awks s ~ Pa_rt ?V - tc be CCILDl?ted bf County Eng-ineers Office A. County Engineers Oi fice requirements icr prel-minary plats have been satisfied. B. Signature _ - ~ 61ignature and title date ~*•*~:~*~**,~*s**~***~~►~*+s**s**s*s*ssss:+tss*a~*a«xs*..:s~s**:s*:ss~s*s*s**~=~s~s~**s#s+~*r~~s Part V- to be completed by County IItilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for prelicninary plat have (have not) been satisfied. B. Signature 7 ~ 1~ 7 signat e an title d.a.te «*r~s**=*~s~***~*rts s~~ •~~*s**s*sss~•t*ss*s*s*s**s~*s~*s***+~~*+~s***s*~s*~s~~s*ss*R~**»+~s* This part to be completed by Planning Depa_rtment ~ Planninq Department Information Date 'O"ubmitted: 71 Preliminary Plat Fee: , Date Accepted: ( 2-~ Checklist Fee:~ Plat File No. :J~-'- 13 L~ --V Zone Change File No. Plat Name : 0 0~ ay't) Existinq Zoning : Y, 02~ Number of Lots: 3 Date Established: Location : Sec. TR-7~ Advertised Zone Change : School District :~,t~L3 Checked by : ~rUSE~ Hearinc Date : ` ~{~Sr rti 6 o u: ~ o.v 7 d'~-. o~- ~ ~ R ECEIVED PRELIMINRRY PLAT CONFERENCE CHECKLIST JUN 6 1979 (Return this sheet with the Application) SPOKANE COUNTY 0AIP~~ Date of Conference : N ING~PARTMENT ECEIVED ~ 119 19 Sec: Twnshp. Range 44 r ;POMNF COUNTY Total Acres No. of Lots ~ p!_r\NNINC, C1[F ARIMW Proposed Pl at Name . APPL ICANT' S NAME i ~ AODRESS : W 4 PHONE: Zip: v C, THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SU6MITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE 6Y THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT FOR HEARING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, EXPLAINED IN DETAIL ON THE INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS HAND-OUT SHEET: , ULL PRELIMINARY PLAT FEE ($195.00 +$5.00/lot: Maximum $750.00) - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE ($240.00 Fee Required) (-.---PLAT APPLICATION (EXHIBIT A) (All signature blocks complete) ~,--t-EGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp) 4-.----6GINEERS SECTION MAPS (2) (EXHIBIT C) (With parcel #'s) 4.---A-S-SESSORS SECTION MAP (1) (EXHI6IT D) (Show other owned or optioned land) lr-~RLIMINARY PLAT MAPS (6) (EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required) A. 2 RLACKLINE COPIES (DO NOT FOLD BLACKLINE PRINTS) B. 4 BLUELINE COPIES , ~ELOPMENT PLANS (EXHIBIT F) ~ rA.J) SEWAGE STUDY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives) A.2 WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water service) B. STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS (If required by Engineers) C. LANDSCAPING PLANS (Required when land use conflicts might occur) D. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If required by Engineers) 1-'6VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHIBIT G) ($60.00 Fee Required) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STAFF REV I EW OF PROPOSAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A. UNIQUE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES:t\C B. CULTURAL RESOURCES: • C. COMMENTS: , - r,~,~•,~~ Date . 'at Dn.strator ' ~ PE-1322-79. A Hearing to consider the application of John B. byers, N 408 Pines Road, Spokane, WA. 99206 to file a plat to be known as The property being platted is described as: Section 6, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Block 35 of Orchard Avenue, except the E 70.56 ft. of the S 158.62 f t. located in Section 6. (In the Spokane Valley on the NW corner of the intersection of Glass Avenue and Ella Road). VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ,~r~,L• , Being first duly sworn, deposea and says: That at all t es mentioned berein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on 19 7, hc personally posted three (3) true and correct copies`of the hereto attacne NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 2. ✓ ' - / ~ . Subscribed and sworn to me ~ , NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNT,Y, WASHIIvUl'0 tl Residing at Spokane, Washington p 14 ~ 0~ To ~ D$te TimP WHILEY4UWEREOU1' M -0-4M ,.A? ot a 1 Phone No - TELEPHONEO ` WA9 !N TO SEE YOU - - ~ ~ ' M WANTB TO SEE YOU RETURNEO YOUR CALL 1 ~ ~ Message do* 'v~,e.~ ~ ' s~ , A,&W - L aco~ 7AANSCAIPT* BRANO No. 01461 A OUALITY PARK PRODUCT FIfdAL PLA1' CHECKLIST A. Received Blueline Copies (5) and Assessor's Map of property outlined in red ~ B. Circulated to Departments: Quilding Codes Assessors Treasurers ~vi th Assessors hiap Nealth District C . Comnients from Departments F I NAL PLAT REVI EW l. Final Plat Leroyed or Legible J/ 2. Su bd i v i sion N'ame ✓ 3. Secti on, Toti•rnshi p and Range ~ 4. Certificate to Plat (no older than six months) 5. Signatures of pa i-ti es 4ri th vested i nterest (Check CertificaCe to Plat) ~ C6.,~ Signature of 111ashington.Regi,stered Surveyor & tiotarized 7. Sheet size 24" x 36" 8. North Arrow, Scale (50' = 1", 100' = 1", 200' 9. Bold Goundary Liiie of Plat ~ 10. Locati on and tqi dth of Qroposed streets-, al 1eys , ri gii t of way, easeinents, parks, open space and proper 1 abel ing of spaces to be dedicated to the publ ic ✓ 1 1. S tt-eet names C~ 12. Check 1 ot si zes coiTipati bl e v;i th pl at approval & Zoni ng Ord ' Vnce VOO'* 1 3. f t. ft~FN' °di ng 1 ine and radi us 1 ot 1ines V 14. Layout, nuilibers and dimensions of lots & parcels ~ 15. CheclC dedication (are conditions of preliminary plat approval incl ucled ) 16. Private Restrictions (Covenants) r 1 7. I`umber and type of U n i ts of - Condi ti ons wj th approval 18. Ded i cati on of Streets to the publ i c 19. 1 f L. stri ps i ndicated 20. Easement verification and illustration 21. Water Letter or N20 Plan 22. Power Letter ~ 23. Pnone 24. C1ieck ea semen ts , Cl ouds on property, etc. fram Ti tl e Report 24. Check for Coinpl i ance wi th Shorel i nes Management Act Add i ti ona 1 COi11111eI1tS , .T ~ ' „ , h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~.a A~GE~U~, August 30, 197~ TELEPN~NE; 4~6-2205 , SPO~KAI~E COUNTY ~LANNIPJ~ SUB~D~U~SI01~ HEA~I6~G E~Ai~INER C~P~~'~ITTEE ~ ~11- TIME: Thursday, Augu~t 30, 1979- 9:~U A.M. {Ite~n #5 on P~orr~ir~g A~en+da~ P~,~~E ~ Br~~ad~ray Centr~ ~u i 1~i r~g, ~nd F~ ~or ~ ~21 ~~ff~rso~n, 5pokane ~ ~E PRE~I~1I~4~Y SU~DIVISI(~N ~E~1~~~-79# ~R!~OKS ~RD~}~TI~D~d a~ La~atiun: ~he proposal i~ la~atcd in Spokane Va11~y ~n the 1VW corr~~r ~f the inter~~c~ion c~f Gl~ss Aver~u~ ~nd E11~a ~o~a~ b. Le~~l ~escr~p~iun: Section 6, Tvwr~~~i,~ 25N, ~~ng~ 44 E.~J.'M. B1ack 35 of ~rchard Avenue~ except the ~ast ~0~5~ f~. of t~e sauth ~5$.62 ~t, l~cated ~n ~~c~i~n c. Spon~or: Johr~ B;yer~ ~408 P i nes ~~t~k~ne, 992[~fi d. ~ngin~er: Cha~rles E . Simpson N ~09 14rgonn~ Rc~~d SpQkane, WA. 99~OE ~ ~e. Sit~ ~iz~: .8 acres~ ~ f . Number ~of Lats : ~ g, Propa~~d ~~a~d U~~: Sin~~e~ fa~m~~y dw~l~ings h. Existing Z4ning: Agr~cultural Suburban ~ i. Wat~r Sour~e; Orchard Aven~~ trrigation R~strict ~6 - j, SGhool D7strict: ~e~t Ya~l~y Schaol a~str~ic~ #3~3 r~ethad ~o~" '~ewag~ aispn~al: Yr~divid~a~ a~-sit~ sept~c t~nk~ l. Envir~r~rw~ental I~~pact, A topic vf discussian at ~his Hearing may b~e wh~th~r the Hearing Exami~,er Camni~tee ~h~s a~equat~ inforr~m~t~on t~ ~,~~~s~s th~ advers~ ~nvir~r~n~ntal Impacts o~` th~ pr~p~~~l T~~ St~te Environmental Po~~~cy A~t WAC ~97~i~~53~ {2} pr~~r~d~s that; '~,..,.In t~re ~~r~nt tha t~he f urt~er i nv~es~i ~ati on~ aut~~ri zed by thi s secti ~n do nc~~ prav~d~~ in~~rr~a~ian reasona~ly suffi~~ent to as~ess any ~ot~ntia~ adverse ~nvi r~w~mental impac~t~ v~ th~ prt~p~a~al ,~n sha~ 1 be pr~pared. ~ ~ +o~ntyr ~~r~~n ~~~t . - - - - . , .