The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1319-79 , AGEPlJ,q, July 31 , 1979 TELE°HOilJE :456-2205 SPOKAtIE COUNTY PLANNIPar, SUBDIVISIO~d HE/!RING E;;Ai'lINER COtiiiITi EE TI'iE: Tuesday, July 31, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item ,-;`3 on (lorning Aqenda) PLACE : B roadW►ay Centre Bu i 1di no, 2nd Fl oor PJ 721 JeTferson ; Spokane PRELIN?iNARY SUBDIViSiOrJ PE-1319-79, EAP,L HOOVE2 REPL;T a. Location: The proposal is located in the Snokane Valley betaleen Bessie and Sargent south of Al ki llve. b. Legal Descri pti on : Secti on 18, Tok•rnshi p 25.11, °ange 44 E.'.I .;I. Lot 3, 81ock 8 of Harrington's Addition to Nutchi nscn as per pl at thereof recorded i n~/ol ur~e Spage 1 of Pl a ~s" i n the office of the Spokane County Audit-or ' c. Sponsor: Loren E. Hoover E 8121 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Surveyor: David C. Clausen E 9803 Sprague Sool:ane, 1r4A. 99206 e. Site Size: .9 acres f. iJur,iSer of Lots : 3 g. Proposed Lanc1 Use : Si noi e i'ami 1y d-wel 1 i ngs and dupl ex h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. 14ater Source: Hutchinson Irrigation District j. School Di stri ct - ?flest Va 11 ey 4363 k. fiAihod of Sewage Disposal Individual on-si 'ue septic tanks l. Environmental Ir~ipact: A topic of discussion at tnis Hearinc nay be 4•lhether the Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Inpacts of the proposal. The StaLe Environmental Policy llct W,4C 197-10-530 (2) provides that: .....In the event that the further invest-igations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufl'icient to assess any potential adverse environmental imoacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be preparee." -3- v E + , ~ ' L~ ~ y ~~►w ~ ` . JL Wli _ wcL t Z ~ y....~ W Cal .3 Gi- ' 4 • . I 21 L W ~ ~f - 0 2~ ` $yARP b w , a 1J ~ {{~po~,• r ' ~ ■1 ~ / t t ~ 0 Q ~ vnC . • r , ' z DIL T Q J ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ pEaNt~r ~ Q J r a~ • 'Junior GATALDO ~ r rA AV . . - -c a -J ..y.l gh: . ~ Z . : ~ ~ ~ < oN~ a ~ Y , . . z I a ~ Y I Q 3 D ALK I 90 o u p 0 NEA J 0 ff ~0 1 WAY tam tp,!' ~ _ ~ o p ' , HARRIN TCj ~ h ~ a cc ¢ Q 6poKOne ~ ~~n~ ~ 7 If 114 RiH ,1p U i a ..._N V ~ IDE R 8r ~d' r .~a p~aN r3~ae~ci e5ar''N~ 0 2 vE IZ-xi~4~1PE ~ _ ~ . _ _ . . . - • - • - - - . _ . _ . . . _ ~ - • _ p ~ ~ ` " ' ~ k; +~~i';' ~ . PRAGU E AvE, Np .t. - ~ k 312 r 20 ~ol • ' i ' L tX rNist: ~ ' . q A T^ ~ ~ h, Fd9ecl;ff lN t Sbno fprium z • fR # {~i..q I - foo~ r`aon.ulua=a~'_r S"i . i . AGENDA, July 31, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOK1aNE COUPdTY PLANPJING SUBDIVISIO~J HE/-1RIPJG EXAHMER CO!MM1ITTEE TII•lE: Tuesday, July 31, 1979 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #3 on florning Agenda) - PLACE : B•roadv!ay Centre Bu i i di na , 2nd Fl oor " Pd 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY S'JBDIVISIOiv PE-1319-79, EAPL HOOVER REPLAT ~ a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley betvdeen Bessie and Sargent u south of Alki Ave. b. Legal Descri pti on : Secti on 18, Townshi p 25fl1, Range 44 E. E•1. M. Lot 3, Block 8 of Harrington's Addition to Hutchinscn as per plat thereof recorded in Volune S page 1 of "Plats" in the • off i ce of the Spokane County Audi tor c. Sponsor: Loren E. Hoover E 8121 Sprd9Ue Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Surveyor: David C. Clausen E 9803 Sprague Spol:ane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: .9 acres f. iJunber of Lots : 3 g. Proposed Land Use: Sinc►le family dwellings and duplex h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Hutchinson Irrigation District j. School District: !ifest Valley 7363 k. flethod of Sewage Disposal Individual on-si t-e septic tanks l. Environmental Irnpact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be tiihether the Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Inpacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy llct blAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not . provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental imoacts o"lc the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -3- . , ~ vc ~ yK ~ 'h r,,, , ~ w Spi~ro ~ ~ W ; ..fi (r o s V E , ~ E~ ~ ► t I ~ ~ ~ = i,• Y . y MA, xwE. f~; ~„t~rwGLL~ ; Q ^K ~ z , r ~ St1ARp o ~ 4 r • ID w. ~ 4 J a , ~ , ,y Z. t a ~ ~i ~ QN~ Vac ' ~~D~~T AV . -A ..r~ Ta, Z A f>6 r p7I,L00 } Y mior ~ G da I NU z O'..~..--y'~ 4 Q ~ ' ~ ' oa a r 0 ~ a a U oc ~ 13 1 i' i r ~ ~ l~ ~ {L ~ t~ ~ ~ h. N~'~ Ox ~ a d N o 4 HARRIN TGtv ~ 12 u { ~I ~ o1u• A/~~~ - Mp RiN TON O , 6Pokane RIVEQ FwOr"~ O~M'tr~C ~ V. ~ i i"~ ~ ft° Pc,.4r+r 43 , - \ # R grod4 . ~ ^ -N° Z ~ 1 ' 3►2 r ~ t - IAE ~98' F s14 ok ~ _ p ~ - ~ ~ a. cc ' Tr l ~ cc ~gecl;ff W ~lll:14( ~ r T t At . ~ . - y..,.r.:~i-~►"~'~'~ w - ~ ~ ~ X First American Title Company o f Spokane MAIN OFFICE ESCROW OFFICF West 704 Farsl Auenue Order No. 27711 Norlh 8611 Drurston • Sucte B Spokane, Washirzgton 99204 CCS - Spokane County Plann~`~"B~Jane, Yi'ashuigton 9920$ Phone. (509) 456-0550 ~ Spokane County EngineerPhone (509) 484-1600 . PLAT CERTIFICATE To: Senske & Assoc. Earl Hoover Replat E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA Attn: Tom Slade Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of August 13, 1979 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: Lot 3, Block 8, HARRINGTON'S ADDITION TO HUTCHINSON, according to plat recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, Page l, in Spokane County, Washington. _ This company certifies that record title is vested in LOREN E. HOOVER AND CAROLYN F. HOOVER, husband and wife, free from all liens, enucmbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 Amount: $220.40, last half Tax Account No.: 18544-0618 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1979 By: Hutchinson Irrigation District #16 Amount: $57.50, last half NOTE: There will be a$3.00 charge by the County Treasurer if the above assessment becomes delinquent. 3. MORTGAGE: Mortgagor: Loren E. Hoover and Carolyn F. Hoover, husband and wife Mortgagee: Farmers and Merchants Bank of Rockford, a Washington Corporation Original Amount: $40,000.00 Dated: June 14, 1979 ~ Recorded: June 20, 1979 ~ Auditor's File No.: 7906200401 ~ 7 ~ Affiliated wrth Frrst Am ~IcanlT tIe Insurance Company /9~9 C0, ti~ a, ` , . , Page 2 Order No. 27711 NOTES: l. Said premises lie within the boundaries of Hutchinson Irrigation District #16, and are subject to future assessments by said district. This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST laMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE 1 ~ • • red Trochimowicz Title Of f icer FT/sb IUCLLLLt ~uko(LA(~ ~ ~ Pacific Northwest Bell spokane, August 21, 1979 Spakane Caunty Flanning Commi.ssion Nflrth 721 Jefferson Street Spakane, Washingtan 99260 Re: THE EARL HOOVER REFI.AT. Gentlemen: Pacxfic Northwest Bc1l wou].d request the private road shown within the plat be deslgnated as a public utility easement. : D. ~'leming Right-af-GVay Agent IVorth 944 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 39202 GDF: kfb cc; Tom Slude R E C E v E D Auc 2 3 1979 sPOKANE caUNTY PLANN1NG DEPARTMENT ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Uffice Communication O Date: October 9, 1979 TG: Spokane County Planning Commission FROM: Dennis Kroll, R.S. ~ •~G%~%~i~ , SUBJECT: EARL HOOVER REPLAT l. Reference: a. Staff analysis for subject plat dated July 31, 1979• 2. Recommendation: a. Condition #13 on page 3F of reference 1 above shall be deleted. b. It will be necessary for the drainfield systems on each lot to be installed according to the plot pla.ns on file - at this office. slc c: Senske & Associates E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 ~ ~ ~ , 19 ~ ,19 N~ C~ oo PQ~Vo`N SCHD-AGM-118 • , . ` - ' -,t NOo 79 1474 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, tiIASHINGTON. PE-1319-79 ~ IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ~ OF EARL HOOVER REPLAT LOCATED IN SECTION~18, R E S 0 L U T I 0 N TOWNSHIP 25N, RANGE 44 E.W.M., SPOKANE ~ COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the final plat of EARL HOOVER REPLAT Lot 3, Block 8 of Harrington's Addition to Hutchinson as per plat thereof recorded in Volume S page 1 of "Plats" in the office of the Spokane County Auditor in Section 18, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded cated in this pl at will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissionerso ED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF OCT 22 1979 , i9 PASS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONo r NSEN, CHIN. 1ERRY C. KOPET liARRY"1Vf-LARREd ATTEST: VERNON W o OHLAPJD Cler the Board . . A,y • ~ / r RECEIPT Date r0A oLzti 19 -lq 3324 Received Fram V'C, Ad d res . r r, oU 3~4 S,f ~x, w...,c w 't n - F`~- " ,Z-=v ' Doliars $ «t n F o - C-Avt.C-i PC.4 pe e - ~ ~ ►314 - "7 q dr - -4 ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMr oF AhTT~iG D£PARTNiII~ ACCOUNT I CASH COUNTY pL AMT PAIb ~ CHECh ~ /0 BAL~UECk i MONEY B ~C7 ~M/1/1 O1.~f Y . 8K806 Redifprm ~ ; . . _ . • ' , p1.A? C!MCK Li8? L. ~ ~ . 0 K.. UMMMW~ 1 l. 1'46141 l'lyt L.AsroYUJ Q Kok . 1. SuludivAaiun Wdihu J . SULtivn. towityt►iN d raiitJu 1. Spoltsortb) ikau►u (y) ~ S . Eliqir►dar or suaveyor 6. Sheet sizd 2 4" X 3664 7. North polnt, bcdlu 1100' - 1" or 200' _ 1•'~ - 0 ~ 8. 6oundoty Line , 9. Locatton 6 widths of proposed Ctreats, alleye, rlqhte , of way, edsdments, parks, open apacee, b propor lat,eling oE spacds to be dedicoted to the publlc lU . !.aYout 6 nanids o1 adjolrUng subdlv181ons a. RzNldts - Ldyout 6 Namd ot tha repiat shall 1e allown by ciashed lines , 11 Stroot iidmus - cutistbtent with dxi9ttny streets . in city dnci couiity. C heck aqast nanq# orL round t►dme whee1. , ~ 12.• Lotstzes - i .e., 80' X125' with 10,000 sQ. It. ~ toir sin9le ldmily lot Cul De Sdcy - dU' at buildil►y line 1's. Layaut, numbur b, dna dlntdnsions ot lots & OK percel8 14. Necdasdry unymuc:rinq cldtd 15. toea dediidttuii 5tatc tt 1«djvivudl watdr and/or publtc sdworb will le Nruvitldd ►n accorciance with pirdl/n►liidry }►ldt ot aNNroval. lb. Notorizdc/ Uurtiticattuji by a protnasiondl lancl -iurvayof. ~ !'rtvd►td re btr ic;t~tolks ti dli 1?. . Y 18. Nusntmt dnci tYNu iut utitte ~ - 19. Lwdlcdtlun c,t struuts to the Nublic .~:t#.i:x• ~ lU. Edybnwat vailljc;ation 4 Illuytrotlon J'°weu' 21 CAe:uk dasd~~~u~~t~ , cloucl5 on Nropdrty, , etc. ~ _ t ruin 'fAtld Ru Nuit K dgi ~ - - o _ I r 'CLOJCr ~1,7179 Spokane Cou.rlVy Kealth i•I 1101 C O11 r ;~pokare, c,1~r~l (iCI1tICI'!C?1' 3otl► froM contects ra:zd conlxriv:,itro , L-t...e :!ut,crli::yc .Witea. District, can advise t:~~~_•~ ?re iu do:nes tic ar othendse, in c::istcrace vi tlt.in 150 = e~ : o' tze : ropei•tyr, L:fl.Y'J. S1QOVoT z•cplat, at •1;^0 Nlki. , ery tX -ou ' :OC'!e_. LEN • Pa,; ► r iKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Comnunication " Date: October 9, 1979 6'ipokane County F'i annir,g, Cvrc.mizsioti T0: FROfI: Dennis Kroll, R. 3. SUBJECT: EARL Ii00VIR REFL."►T 1. Refercncc:: a. ataff unalysis !'or subject p? at c:4tea .Iuly 31, 1979. 2. Recommendation: a. Conciition W13 an puee 3F uf re`'ere:nce 1 ut~ove ::ha.ll be deleted. b. It will bt necessary for the urairifielcl ::ysten►s on eacti lot to be iiistullea accordint; to the pl ot p? ans on file at this office. ! p ~ •e - r~ • ~ ~ ~e V ~ l a fe/ S ~ w ei~ e 31 C , c : SEn3ke 8: tl:►sociates . ~ •a~-~ E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 \ ~CN U- ADM-M ' 'SPOKANE COUN?'Y NEALTN DISTRICT Intet-Office Corrrmun.ication ► 3~~ D,a te nctob*r 4, 1971 TO: 5pokitne County Pl.1nnlnR FROM: Ptnnis RTOll ~ SUBJECT: Eatl IIoover Replat t 1.) RP:erence: Star: anaiq.ir. reFort for subject plat dated July ?I, 1979. ~ . j 'teco-~-c_. t i ons : a) Gonditlcm "lli on paKe 3 G of Tefareace 1 ebove atull b• delotod. 1)) The IrAt senr6ncN r." c.:utliCicn 015 tefetcnce 1 Abo•fe shal: be deleted s1nce a duplex structure io not t:. :.a Luil 't on Qny of the lc+ts. cc: Sevsk• i A.isociate8 L. 9503 :,prttt;uo spokan•, Wn 99206 ':ND-ADM-118 SP' 1NE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT cer-Uffi ce Communi cati on Date: October 9, 1979 TO' opokane Courity Pi annic-q; FROtI. • DEnnis Kroll, SUBJECT: EARL IioovL~ RErL„AT , 1. Referencc:: a. Staff analysis fur suuject p?at c:atea July 31, 1979. 2. Recomniendation : a. Condition #13 on paje 3F uf re ference 1 ubove shall be deleted. b. It will be necessary for the drainfiela systc:n« vn each lot to be iiistalled ucco2-dint; to the gl ot p1ans on file at this office. slc c: Senske & Associates E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 SCHU-ADM-11 ij ~i • ` 9 , y tr ~ 1 Pacific Northwest Beli ~ Spokane, August 21, 1979 y \ \ V Spokane County Planning Commission North 7221 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: THE EARL HOOVER REPLAT. Gentlemen: Pacific Northwest Bell would request the private road shown within the plat be designated as a public utility easement. G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF:kfb cc; Tom Slude ECEIVED . OC i- SPOKANE COUNTY SPOftANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPART~I~NT plA~1NIN6 DEPART~IENT I ~ ~ a . - , ~ ' • L ` ' .f - Pacific Northwest Beil . .-e . , ' Spokane, August 21, 1979 ^ Spokane County Planning Commission North 721 Jefferson Street Spokanc, Vr'ashington _ 99260 Re : THE EARL tI00VtiR REPLAT. GentZemen: ' Pacific Northwest Bell would request the private road shown within the plat be dcwignated as n public utiiity easement. G. D. Fleming • Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF:kfb cc: Tom Slude . .SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRrCT .In t er-Offi ce Communi ca ti oh Date October 4, 1979 TO: Svokane Countv PlanninA , . FROM: Dennis Kroll r ~ SUBJECT: Earl Hoover Replat 1.) Ref erence : Staff analysis report for subject plat dated July 31, 1979. 2.) Recommendations: a) Conditian #14 on page 3 G of reference 1 above shall be deleted. b) The last sentEnce of condition #15 reference 1 above shall be deleted since a duplex structure is not to be built on anq of the lots. cc: Senske & Associates E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 ~ ~ O~, ~ l.~ ~ S J~ . ~ 40 OFA9 ~,~T` SCHD-ADM-118 . f 'le Nv. PE-1319-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FlNDI(VGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on July 31, 1979, and the members of the ComFnittee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Loren Hoover, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat Earl Hoover Replat for subdivision of .9 acres into 3 lots for single family dwellings and duplex and there being present, the following applicant or representative: . TOM SLADE C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential usage. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RC4V 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been compf ied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 1 No. PE-1319-79 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to i,he general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the R-1, Single Family zone includes all uses within the Two Family zone and accordingly the rezone from Two FamEly to R-1 without advertising is appropriate. D. SPECIAL CONDITfONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. 4. That aQpropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the uti I ity company must be received prior to the submittal of the finai plat. 2 9 ~--ile No. PE-1319-79 5. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water suppiier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy thei r respective needs. Said water plan and certification wi I I be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for buiiding permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 3 5 ♦ F No. PE-1319-79 6. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the finai plat. 7. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to August 1, 1980. 8. That a declaration of Nan-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any appraving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. N4TE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 9. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the piat by the County Engineer. ' 10. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 11. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. ~13. That each lot be authorized for the use of individuai on-site sewage disposal systems, provided that there is 38 feet of rear yard structure setback and two 26 foot side yard setbacks on the north and south side of a structure intended for Lot 3. 4 r ~ -ile No. PE-1319-79 ,w„ 14. The dedicatory language of the plat will state the sponsor will assume no responsibility for provision of domestic tivater. (Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Dedicatory language of the plat shall inciude the statement, "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved. Special Conditions 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 17. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 18. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaratian of Non-Significance. 79. That a public water system serviced by Hutchinson I rrigation District, and including fire flows, serve each (ot prior to the saie of the lot. 20. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be revieUVed and approved orior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 5 i '10 F No. PE-1319-79 21. The sponsor shall present evidence prior to filing final plat that the existing wastewater systems are contained 10 feet interior of the boundaries of Lots 1 and 2. Also a plot plan identifying the location of a future replacement drainfield shal I be submitted for the same lots. 22 The sponsor shall prepare a definite statement that no private wells are /VetoS -~0 ~ located within 150 feet of the Plat boundaries Prior to final Plat. .4 23. That all roads within the plat be paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 24. Proposed private road serving two lots with no extension possible. 25. That private road be improved to standard adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 26. Dedication of five feet additional right-of-way along Alki Avenue. 27. That the owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest an R I D or C RP on AI ki Avenue to comply 4vith County Paving Policy. 28. Proposed cul-de-sac is substandard and should be improved to standards of County Engineer. 29. That the proposal is rezoned to Single Family Residential. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Loren Hoocer for a preliminary plat, Ear1 Hoover Replat and a zone change as described in the application should be approved. 6 r > , ,le No. PE-1319-79 Motion by: McCoury Seconded by: Myers Vote: 2 for 1 against (Approved) HEARING EXAMINER COMMfTTEE Chairman . + r d ATT EST : FRED L. DAYHARSH ' Planning Director B y : c - 7 I A NtL k1 ~r . , C 4. ~r ~ First American Title Company of Spokan&KANE couNrY PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE ESCROW OFFICE West 704 Fcrst Auenue Order No. 27711 Nnrth 8611 Dcucscoiz • Suite B Spnkane, Washiizgtoia 99204 cCS • Spokane County Plan~f~~ ne, Washcngton 99208 Phone• (509) 456-0550 ~ Spokane County EngineerPhone. (509) 484-1600 PLAT CERTIFICATE To: Senske & Assoc. Earl Hoover Replat E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA Attn: Tom Slade Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of August 13, 1979 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: ~ Lot 3, Block 8, HARRINGTON'S ADDITION TO HUTCHINSON, according to plat recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, Page l, in Spokane County, Washington. This company certifies that record title is vested in LOREN E. HOOVER AND CAROLYN F. HOOVER, husband and wife, free from all liens, enucmbrances and objections, except as follows: l. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 Amount: $220.40, last half Tax Account No.: 18544-0618 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1979 By: Hutchinson Irrigation District #16 Amount: $57.50, last half NOTE: There will be a$3.00 charge by the County Treasurer if the above assessment becomes delinquent. 3. MORTGAGE: Mortgagor: Loren E. Hoover and Carolyn F. Hoover, husband and wife Mortgagee: Farmers and Merchants Bank of Rockford, a Washington Corporation Original Amount: $40,000.00 Dated: June 14, 1979 Recorded: June 20, 1979 Auditor's File No.: 7906200401 *CONTINU~E* Affliated with First Amencan Trt e nsurance Company 3 r . 1 Page 2 Order No. 27711 NOTES: 1. Said premises lie within the boundaries of Hutchinson Irrigation District #lb, and are subject to future assessments by said district. This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE ~r ,..1 • • • red Trochimowicz Title Of f icer FT/sb ' wwP 3115 REV. 8-73 . ' . • . • ( ~ , . • . ~ • • • ' ' , . ; - = . , . ~ , • , - ; ' ' ~ . `^4~ .c'=P~'=• --:~r~:~,~'>'.-,~'i'=`_ . ~ _s-li.:Y_ ~'`.-r ^.F=.'. _ ~k-.°~ ~ ~ . ' , ~ ~ . . • ' "7`z_~C • ~ - ~ ~ • . . ' ' , ' • ' ' • . `l~c'. ~ f ~ . • . ~ , . . , _ . . ~ ' ~ ~ , , THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER .COMPANY Electric antl Natural G -as .Seruice - ~ ~ ' • . . ~ ~ • ~ P.0'•BOX 3727,.•SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99,220~(504) 489•0500 • ~ ` . r. • ~ . . Auguet 289' 1979 ~ . . . ~ , . ` . , r . . , . ~ ~ , . _ . . . ; . Et E--V E . - ~ ~ Mr. Tom Slade ' . , Senske -b Ase.ociatea-~ aU G 31 1979 . Eaet 9803 Sprague . ~ Spokane, Waehington 99206' . ~ ~ SPOKANE COU.NTY.~ ~ ~ . . .,Ites ~ Earl Hoover Repiat PLANiVIHG DEPARTMENT . Dear Mr. Slade : . . . . . . . . In reepoaee to your secent requeet, our "engiaeers have 'studied eubj ect ; prelimin,ary plat and , have ascertained -that -additioaal'-utility .etrips tvill ~ . not 'be ~ needed. , - ~ , . • , ' : ~ . ' - ' , ' • • • , ' S ' , • . Very .~trulq yours, . ~ . ~ Ri.chaZd Muf fett ~ . ~ ~ . Righte og. Way '8upervieor RM:mh . . ~ ~ CC: 3pokane County Planaing Coamiieeiont/ _ Bob Waetberg -.Marketing . . , . , . . . S E R V 1 N G T H E.,,. : I•`N -L A N D_ E M P. I R, E O F W A S H I N G T O, N- A N D ~ 1 C A N O, ` ' • ' ' . " • . , File # _Br 1 ~1f'7 1 . r 1 41 Sec. ~ T'sh'p R'ge 4~t ClassiFication , ~ . T P ropa n e n t !6!~I? L +kLE~ e€P~ ,~t ~~„~~~.~~;,~,:..T~Q ~ ~ ~ 4.~ . . ` (LereK ver) . , _ . . . .~~a a ~ } rA - rx`I!~; T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N DECLARATION OF ( proposed/finai ) (significance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal : Srj$Zjuj_SjC 4) Q.F G± 4C.ad /,4'1TD 3~a ~ 5►F~~ A.&.p I FQ&_.A hU P L"T 2. Proponent: F r.i (-~Qya,o 3. Contact Person: StaAk. Phone: 9a4- 37.5`~_ 4. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change ✓ Prel+minary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Qther : • , 5. l.ocation of Proposal: JL~ A-IK, AUE' . 6. Lead Agency: SPQKAN E COUNTY, WASH i NGTON This proposal has been determined to 007- have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is --Per required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a compieted environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsibie Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Name ~ 1~4~t1 t • ~0 ~5 ~ Signature Si ture 9na , ALI , Title Tit{e ~ ~ Department U. N(?-. Department -.~e;Ajf~. Date 3v- y 1613 Date 7;I31 ~ Revised 6i1/79 df 8. For Declaration of Significance Only : i / / Date of Expected Draft EIS Available (determined by Responsible Official ) / Date of I ssuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration. b. grief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken by the appiicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of non-significance. J n 51)0KANE VALLEq. FIRE DEPIARTIAENT ~ - ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE ANE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE•(509) 928-1700 July 23, 1979 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director ~ S pokane County Planning Commission S econd Fl oor Broadway Centre Bui 1 ding N721 Jefferson ~ Spokane, Washington 99260/~ .4 ? Dear Mr. Oayharsh: . ~ , The following prel}imina y u di` i ions and zone classification . for upgrading has been r ie~edY or, fi re protection: J PE-1318-79 ..,Rhine Addi~tion ~ ZE-151 -79 Keto . .fi PE-1319- 79 H oovpr PN-1317- 79 Bi 9OeA dows* 1 on~ ZN-141- 79 Cl e e"~'y 7~' 1 P E-1320- 79 ` 01 Ve'KS-kte 2n iF i on Ra~3~ - The above pe ~f-fra9'n andk~iy.ra, s, Ito be inst4l~I,ed in this ~ area. Ac~e~.~pl,an ~for,~`~~~r~.~ting equi,pment °Aro,und the ~ bui ldi g,s~ial ~be appr ~i~~~ ' j to ~uil ~ing pe~^mi`~ i ssuance. S / „ -~v~ ~ l g,,' ar~. • . `e > 1 ~ i a / y ► d' 3 y ( , ~ ~ ~ .t• , " ~ ~ r~ ; Cook ` " ' . . _ ' ~ ~ • ~ ~ Lt. of Inspectom r' „'r` % 'Y . . y . , " AC:sn ► ~ REcHvEi) ~ , J U I r; iCqns, ~I J J t / . V 1 O 1\!l l` V O V 1C ( 1 n PLAi1'NING DEPARTi1IEP1T PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES ~ ~ , . SPOKANE COUNTY ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ • , _ ~ ~f - • 9 ~s ~ - - N. 721 .1EFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 y y„~ ~ b/ J a I n~'~~ J , \\l S, ~ G'~, ~ ~ . o - U k2. Donald H, Lounder E 8504 A1 {ci Spol:ane, WA, 99206 , ~ i. '~CSSf[i C j;3tA _°0 FORI~JAR!l f~T~lLfi CO SEM1lpER ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT _J ` N. 721 JEFFERSON SPOKAIVE, WASHINGTON 99260 J'JL 2J'T~ ti~ Le ti` '~l 0 1. 6k~'.L t)-tl~ PL~'A°I' John N. Canpbell E 11020 31st Spof:ane, WA. 99216 ia l t = • E ~ ;JCJ FOR ?D ~ ` 4~ m to J SEtJv~R ~ S973 ti ~ mJ3I.LL%"O iG Apvll.~..c a t ion- ,l~J • I ~ I / y- Az/.~C.GL-v • ' / r.~L~-- - , i.o rCcCird i~. . Gp:-,USI'^iCi,r 'T. rD ~ T JD j otl ',r-Sr. -ta at thi5 ~ ='~eck O'-:~ ) `IrS ?:0 , ;,rame (»oase AdCL"@ S3 _ ~ --a ---r n • ` ^ ?n:~.;.C 'M~= 7#G Apo? icz -tion No.,y-~ Appliezr:t I Y:oulc ?4-.e ~o *--e on racCi.-,-z (Chec'_, c^s , 0?_ cd Sr-`I'G:'T 'ZZE AL. DO yOLl ~J'~sh s'.^. TIz:; r..: _ 2t ivL''~3 .:@a...,..ina? ( C:ze c?c or_e ) v-- c ~ ~ v I ' C f ?i0 Name (Please E., R Addre s s 4 t L, .,,•-T.,-:._. . =..1_:. , C _'.1mi=r. ~.G AYvli cz t.ior. ?7o i wOul^c -1-4';e ~ ~o ~ ;~,e ^ ,+°Ccrd ;r° , . _ i F A'10--R GppOSimmu ..tsr=. DO yOU ,T? ah ytA 'c. t ti.: 3 a'' ing ? (Creck cre ) ~ S , :IO ;'Iame ( ?1 ease ?r ~.r t ) ~ A&re s s ~ ~ 1 ^ ^ '1 ~.T ~'.~re►+r_ PT.1BiZC :.=LR.u IG A=liczt+an No. A7:rDI{ c?nt ; t /7- AVOR 0?-vCsIrl"I'ON ~ ♦LV V'! . Lb ou *er_ sh yx M:T_:; z 4 (C^eck onA) v^c V 'TC Nane (?lease ' f . Add...~c c g AGEPdDA, July 31, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-220- SPOKAfVE COUNTY PLANNIiJG SUBDIVISI0N HEARIiVG EXAPIINER COMi•1ITTEE Time: Tuesday, July 31 , 1979 - 9:00 A.M. _ Place: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane 9 : 00 A . M. . PAGE A. PRELIi+lIPJARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS _ 1. PPd-1271-78, CHATT/120Y PIEADOWS ZN-34-795 Agricultural to ,'-lgricultural Suburban or R-I ►1cKIfdLEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. PE-1318-793 RHINE ADDITIOPd ZE-151-79, Agricultural to R-I and R-2 KETO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. PE-1319-79, EARL HOOVER REPLAT HOOVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 12:00 Noon LUNCH (Place to be announced at Hearing) 1: 30 P. i i. RECONVEPJE B. PRELIf-IIPIARY SUBDIVISIONS APJD ZOPdE RECLASSIFICATIOfvS 1. PN-1317-79, BIG MEADOWS ADDITIOP! ZN-141-79, Agricultural to Residential ilobile Home CLEt~ENS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. PE-1320-79, BLUE SKIES 2PdD ADDITIOPJ RAY 5 3. PE-1321-79, PONDEROSA HILLS ZE-138-79, Agricultural to kgricultural Suburban GUTHRIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 * * * * * * ~ ~ * * STAFF AiNALYSIS - July 31, 1979 PE -1319 - 7 9, EE1RL HOOV~ER REPLAT PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION I. GENERAL INTORHATI0N A. Location The prooosal is located in the Spokane vall.ey, more specifically, between Bessie and Sargent lying south of A1ki Avenue. B. Proposal - 9 acres subdivided into 3 lots for single family use and duplex - Typical lot frontage = Varies from 139` to 81° - Typical lot size = Varies from 10,000 to 15,600 C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analvsis: 1. Existing Land Uses The site is currently used for two single family dwellings. " e land uses to the north of the site include sa.ngle family with scattered du} exes and vacant areas. Similar land uses are found east, west, and south of the proposal. The residential lots in this gener3l area have been createa through segregations of older plats known as Hutchinson's and Harrington's Addition. These segregations range from approximately 7,500 sq. ft. to 25,000 sq. ft. There has been no platting activity within recent years in the general area as most of the residential uses have occurred through segregations of the olde-r one acre plats. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The proposal is generally consistent with residential land us.=.. within the area. The lot sizes of the proposed replat are also compatible to the wide range of segregated lots in the area. II. SPECIAL INIFORIMATI0N A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and indicates the replat could adequately be handled, provided there be a dedication of five (5) feet additional right-of-way along A1ki Avenue. Furthermore, the County Engineer has requested the proposed private road be improved to standards adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and that the proposed cul-de-sac be widened to those standards. - 3 B - STE1F'F ANALYSTS - July 31, `79 EARL HOOVT^ REPLAT - continued B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewaoe dis- posal means; includin; on-site septic •tank disposal, comrilunitv septic tUnk disposal, and conununity package tre3tment plant disposal. For economic reasons, and to provlde the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engi- neer feels on-site septic tanks srould be utilized. The Spokane County Health Dzstrict i-.3s authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lo* within the plat. The plat ls situated over the Spokane Valley Aqulfer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 3 lots on .89 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its indzvidual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the arEa and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct oF the 4rmy Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewa--~ dispasal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued uril) , development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the grounclt.a ~-_er. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitati q years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent do-s reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent wlll be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are knowa to react with soil particles, or nitrates, whicLi are taken uo by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated resulc= at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate t;at the ma:cimum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at presnet (19751) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The ferecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared wifih the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate vc,Iume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the r3nge o£ 2.8 to 3.0 ppm. A projected incremental zncrease using Dr. sodd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 3.0 to 3.2 ppm. Current Federal and State drznking water stand3rds permit up to 10 ppm. - 3C - ST.~FF ANALYSIS - July 31 1979 EARL HOMIER REPi.AT - continued d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- caater have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the dzscharge irom the Dzpartnent of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether indivxdual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a coAVentional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. C. Drainape The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Hutchinson Irrigation District. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final water plans and fire flows. F. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of West Valley #363 G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that Earl Hoover Repoat is located in the Dishman neighborhood. No neighborhood park is inticipated as the recreation needs of the neighborhood will be served by a community park proposed at 17.0 acres that should be located adjacent to or in the vicinity of the future junior high school site. - 3 D - ST_r.1FF <~s~TALYSIS - July 31, '179 EARL H001-' REPLaT - continued ~ H. Unique Environmental Features Ivone have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources None have been indentified. ITI. ZONING AiNALYSIS The site is current7.y zoned Aoricultural Suburban and the proposal as presented could be accommodated wlthin the existing zone classification. IV. EiNVIRON`IENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services; utilities and energy. The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITION5: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the prQliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. 4. Th3t appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Departrnent and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 5. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health - 3E - STAFF AiNALYSIS - July 31 ' 979 EARL HC"-T;R REPLAT - continued authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district k7i11 certify, prior to the filing of the fznal piat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequatelv satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that approprlate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance cazth the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule wlll provide, in any case, for completion of the water systQm and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application tor building permits caithin the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from ciaims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 6. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 7. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to August 1, 1980. 8. That a declaration of von-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 9. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 10. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 11. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 12. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 13. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal i systems, provided that there is 33 feet o£ rear yard structure setback and two 26 foot side yard setbacks on the north and south side of a structure intended for Lot 3. - 3F - STAFF Al`IALYSIS - July 31 , 1979 EARL HOOVFR REpLAT - continued ' ' 14. The dedicatory language of the plat will state the sponsor will assume no responsibility for provision of domestic water. 15. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shal? present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement, "Each lot ownership shall be a membe-r of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved. Special Conditions lb. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution hTo. 77-1392 be accomplished by the proJect applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Ex3miner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 17. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. A11 extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 18. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 19. That a public water system serviced by Hutchinson Irrigation District, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the 1ot. 20. That final construction plans for on-szte storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat bt= the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 21. The sponsor shall present evidence prior to filing final plat that the existing wastewater systems are contained 10 feet interior of the boundaries of Lots 1 and 2. Also a plot plan identifying the location of a future replacement drainfield shall be submitted for the same lots. 22. The sponsor shall prepare a definite statement that no private wells are located within 150 feet of the plat boundaries prior to final plat. 23. That all roads within the plat be paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County EnginPer. 24. Proposed private road serving two lots with no extension possible. 25. That private road be improved to standard adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 20. Dedication of five feet additional right-of-way along 41ki Avenue. 27. That the owner, hzs grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest an RID or CRP on Alki Avenue to comply with County Paving Policy. 28. Proposed cul-de-sac is substandard and should be improved to standards of County EngYneer. - 3G - ' STAFF ksVAI,YSIS - July 31 --1979 EL1RL HO('-7R IZEPZAT - continued 29. That no phasing of the plat shall be allowed and the final plat shall be finalized in its entirety. - 3 H - s _ • ; , ' _ ' , ~ ~ , . , _ : t ~ . , , _ ? ` r--✓,, r . ` ' . , ~ 1979 . , . u. . . ~ Ear1 003 V. 4tl) ~ 206 • plat P ~las~ti ~~~on . ~ . a . KooVer ~Re , 'Pa~' ~ne, Re : ~arl S been accepted ha , ~ ~ , ~oove~, east a1~~ vi evr an'~~ - . . : . fi 1 e ¢or Pre' , . , , ~~~r ~l~subd3 vi si4n °n .~he nC~°-SSa ry ~ osai f or a3 10t ~y - thiS af f ic r~cei v ed and L~ . . . - = rop ari n9 ~as.bc~~ ~ Your p . . , , . fflr su`~d i vi si a unty a-,~nc, ~ es , . . . . ; . , , ~~~o f f ~ ~,y - Co ,~,5 GQlnpi ete • : ; ~ . . . , ~ ~~►ear i n9 ~ Si nc.erelY ~ . ~ . 1 ic~i n ~ , . pViut~bard ~r~,tar 1r1a1 I I 5 n. ~ 5 - , Subdiv i si at1 ~ . . . . . , NOW d3 ~ " ~ . • ~ . ~ _ . y - ~ ` , . . . _ . ~ ~~~~~Y ENGI._%. ~F SPOKANE COLlMTY, WA5HlNGT4N Date I 8 , 19-21 Irs4er-of4ice Commidnetalfloie To PLANNlNG DEEPARTMEAIT Fron, GkRY KENNALY 4PL-k-NN TNG & TRAIF!Frc DrVzs roN ENc QTM Subject RQAD CQNDITIONS_ # F~OR PLAT PE 1319 E~Qr1 H0O1te.r ReAq+ IYL--Q 6_`/1/ *CONDIT IO CIRCLED APPLY TO PLA T LYNDER GONS IDERA'1' ION PUBLIC RQA~ STANDARJS - 9(PRZV'ATE ROA~D STk~dDARDS I tt~.at cond3tional ~approva r at is given rubject to dedicatiota af Right of Way and approval o.f -ths rosd system in the plat by the County Ergi.neer; C~>that plan$, urofiles, snd cross sgci:ions srowing proposed street centerline and curb grad$e bo submitted to the County Enginoer for approval prior to construction and the fiJ.ing of afinel plet; [~)-that dreinage plans and design calculatione showi~g the grsdos aad alignment of drainage facilitios be sub►_►itted to the Counuy- Engiraeer for approval prior to conetruction and the f il irlg of a f inal plat; E 4-constxuction tai.thin the proposed public streets and easements aha11 be performed under the direct supervisi.an of a Zicensed land susveyor9 who shall be reaponsible for porpetuating all evidence of the IOGa'tlAFl oz" 9urvey rnonument3 which may lbe dia1•u..rbed durin►g construction and who shall furr.ish the Cowat,y Engineer with 1111.s Built" plans and a certif icate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lxnes e.nd grades ahown on the approved aonstructiori plans anci that all digturbed .monuments he.ve heen replaced; E 5-no conatruCtion work as ta be performecl within the Public Right of Wmy until aDermit tas been issued by the County Enginaere 1,11 w,ork ie aubject to iuspsction and approval by the Cotanty Engizieer; E 6--a11 cvnstruction within the Public Right of Way is to ba completsd prior to fi].ing the final plat or a bond in the anaount estimeted by the Count,y Engineer to cover the cost of con9tructioia og improvements, construction certif ication, "Ae Built" plansp and mor.umenting the 9treet centerlines ahell be z""il.ed wit}i the County rngineer; E 7-no direct acoess iram lots tfl 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to Couniy Standards and eptabliahed aa County Roads; E 8-na direct access fram lots to Stub Road con.nECtions Lirrf:il sucb roads are cortstructed t,o County Standards and established as County Roadg; E 9-road deeign, construct3.onq and drainage control .for 1/2 Rights of Ways and Stub Road con- nections are the responsibility of the Developor; E10-that the eponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a dasign proposal aceepte.ble to the State H?ghway Department of the nroposed State Iiighway-County Road intersec'Liong State Highway Department approvel of the proposed design must be received ,prior- to the filing of the f ina'1 plat o Improvemonte to the Stet.e Highwey are to be the rssponsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished ta the County Engineer in the amount ae determined by the County Engineer snd the State Hi r~wa~r Departme!xt o ~11 that al roads mithin the plat bo ~ paved to the sgecifications of the County Unginoer. E.xist? ng County roads pY•oviding direct aecess 'to lots of 'tohe plat shall be paved and/ curbed to the standards of the CQunty Engineere ~127Pxopoeed pr~.vate a~oad,~~~ serving Zlots withano extension passible"tAoiWAA&, .'-serve 8 ar 1.oss_ lots$ fut-a_r-e pub,114!fth~~-~ WBy---tract-~~, 6l3)that private raad*~lbe improved to standard adopted by the Board of Couaa'ty Cornmiss3.oners. E14-no direct access fxom lots to qEll'~',Medication of )r-:,,' VC ~'Eef- additional Right o£ irlay along_ W/,F-i .4~~ . E1 -that the owner, hi3 gxantees gnd assigns agree to -oaa•ticipate ? n and not oppose or Drotest an RID OW ee C e P ora ~9/,~'i A'!/~• '~'e ee wt olci 1?6+A^)TU pA ir 1 40 q pC I f~!. f r % ~ Y~ra F a Sc d L' t,k1- dLE -Sac,, i S 5 ub 5 rt'a ~ c~ ~r' ~Q ar C,~ 5 h o c.~~,d 10e..- i+ni~ro u t d ~t"~ s~c►~ d*a ~ ca s o~- ~ r~ ~~1~ e v~ • ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH uISl RIC'F I nter-affi c~ ~ommmicati Xi a ° Date; juiv i8*1~2.79 ~ TO: Spvkane County Planning Commission 1 ~ FROM: Dennis KralI, R.S. SUBJECT: Earl Hoover Replat 1) Reference: Our memo to you dated July 10, 1979, aubject as abave, 2] The follnwing is a revisian of paragraph # of reference above +,c.) The dedicatnry language af the plat will state that each 1ot authorized the use af i.ndividual sewage systems, pravided there is a 38 feet of rear ysrd structure set back and two 26-foot side yard set b~ckS an north and s4uth side of g structure tndicated for lot 3, ts . 5C11D-ADM-118 - , POKANE COU(VTY HEALTFi DISTRICT , Irter-Uffi ce Cammuni catior. Date: July 10, 1979 TG : Spokane County P1 -~pni g Commission y,°• Dennis Kroll,-R.S., and Eugene C. P~at e, R.S. FROr. SUBJECT: proposed preliminary plat - Earl Hoover Replat 1. References: a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 30' by David Clausen; dated May 16, 1979, received by this office May 16, 1979. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Soutaheastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Resources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane ValleZ, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metropolitan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Draft 208 Quality Cause and Effect Aquifer Monitoring results. g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District, May 18, 1979. h. Map: Spokane NE Quadrangle, U.S,G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, Soils, and Water: a. This project lies in a relatively flat area south of Alki and midway between Bessie and Sargent. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. R ECEIVED JUL 12 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT S.CHf}-AGM-11 8 ~ Earl Hoover Replat July 10 , 1979 Page 2 d. Two single-family dwelling units are currently located on lots 1 and 2. e. The highest total nitrogen level was 3.0 ppm. The Hutchinson Water District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon comple- tion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 3 lots on about .89 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the ground- water in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd cons.idered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years, subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with solid particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maxi.mum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milli- grams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present unpact on ground- water quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 2.8 to 3.0 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 3.0 ppm. to 3.2 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: a• Earl Hoover Replat - ~ July 10, 1979 Page 3 (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that : a. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. b. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. (Note: The first sentence is superfluous if the easements are shown on the preliminary map as required by Ordinance Chapters 5 and 6.) c. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system. Provided that there is 42-feet of rear yard structure set back and two 26-foot side yard set backs on the north and south side of a structure intended for lot 3. d. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the f inal plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building perrnits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane Counth Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. e. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." f. An on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of the Final Plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved." t # Earl Hoover Replat July 10, 1979 Page 4 g. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall p resent evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." h. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in con- formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. i. The sponsor shall present evidence prior to filing final plat that the existing wastewater systems are contained 10-feet interior of the boundaries of lots 1 and 2. Also a plot plan identifying the location of a future replacement drainfield shall be submitted for the same lots. j. The sponsor shall prepare a def inite statement that no private wells are located within 150 feet of the plat boundaries prior to final plat. ts c: Senske and Associates 9803 E. Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 ~ i,~ • . r •4 ~AH-7d -z , j 7~ PLANNING DEPARTMEN ` . ~ HAO:•DOf:,Y CENTq ~ijC '=~~'.s~i`'~~••_- E BUILOING N 721 JErFEnSuN STREET ,1 S FG '~~~y~.i~-~,.'.'•~~ r P►+ONE 456•2205 , r 5¢CKANE. WASHINGTON 99250 ;20R.►Nc CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 0) X& ~ . (W4_ o F~~ QD~Po .~.06A VTH ot- vT ~ F, D• ~t 1 ~ ~ QUAEST VA L t.& ~~st~s y ~~G• 0 F~~ ZC fto L Dl f&qr Q*UO cp- e. 4. - 0r- it) FROM: Spokane County Pianning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention : AU SI&&&lZ R E F E R EN C E: Lead Agency Desti nation , Threshoid Determi nation, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACT I NG AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the fallowing project: if-as-loi HooV C 1G &P l±A LJS.c I An-b r This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURlSDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY wITH EXPERTISE (wAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on _L;k. ZYOLY . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than Lhe public hearing scheduled f o r ~ ZA)_~ . The subject proposal or action (I5, IS NOT) LOCATED WlTHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKAN E VALLEY SOLE SOU RCE AQU I FER AND AQU I FER ENV I RON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Envi ronmental I mpact Statement ( E I S) or a Ground Water I mpact Evaluation (GWI E) should be prepared. Enclosures R ev . 4/ 17/79 J ~ Wi 4 i . a THIEPMAW I~ . W F~RMAN M i L~ N . 2 ~ f+1 COIEMAN . . . ~ r Z 1 , A ~ rq < - • ~ e N1 = m 0.9 r W MA PARK 1. K 'fl O A D , ARK RD. ~a`' ~ . • . :Y, • n R~ ; o i` Rl I / C . . ~ ~ l -l . r - • D ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ -._.1 C.L ~ , ~~i ' , •'~~0;-~. ~ ; i b ; • , . , ~ 3 . ~ ~ ~ ~ r, j~ ' t • ~ x:.,~~.' ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ t► , J ~ y D q ~ ' ~ .ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t1~ ~ ~ • t1 ~ < J ~ -a N • Z D ~ ` + ' AT ' ~ „ _ lLTON ~ ~1 r ~ ~ ' T < O D V- 4 < ~ Z 0 r" N, ~pca Z z yt,`,1 ~ DORN C7 0 RN ~ - ^ ? A ~ I 4 - - - - - ~ M E,ge C D ~ ~ h ~ ~ ' f • , ~ ~ (!1 ',ARGE NT . ~ R . ~ 5ARG T ;o ' • ' a►ltd u IT c , ~ % N . , O TG ' ' ARGONN ROAD ARGONN ROAO .t - - • E C R p 968A MULLAN ROAD . , M ULLAN i R040 ~ " -F ~ : • • ' y ` R OA O • N ~i V1 t ~ - ~ ~ < ~ rn 7 , IV C Z L O C u T ~ D b0 E 1►1c~ R~O~AO . ` , r► ' ROA rAi J l ~ ~ O xI? Ilw5eCtprsun UfrOERIA , r N a RLAN v VV~lIUA . i F iLE # 7 5 • ~ ~ . . . •h' f- `:i i ~ I ~ 'STAFF RE;= OF ENVIRQNMENTAL C4ECKLIST - SPOMAM[ COU"►~' .'.CUpT MOUSC I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance 'and WAC 19 7-10 , an Environrnental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his aqent. This checklist and any additional pertlnent dat has subsequentl been reviewed by the ~t b 1 c ~ c /N1 NLL~~ ~ I The following data briefly describes the proposal: ~ A. Action (s) Requested: Zone Chanqe; Preliminary Plat _ Approval: Final Plat Approval; Chanqe of Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal : ~-,,L~--~ .9 0414 cS C. Location of ProPosal: ~ II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questfons: (1) Earth (8) T and Use (15) v Energy (2) Air (9) V Natural (16) -LZUtilities Resources (3) `-'W3ter (10) Risk of (17) Human ,Upset Health (4) ~Flora (11) L-,~Population (IS) Aesthetics - (5) V'!Fauna (12) -k---'-H-ousing (19) Rec, (6) ~ :Voise (13) t.-'-Trans./ (20) Arch./ ~ Circ. Hi s t . (7) Light & (14) Publfc (21) Other Glare Services ~ . i ~ ~ . N. B. Potentially sfgnific~nt adverse impacts - are noted under the followinq questions: I / I , C. Discussion of impacts ic?entified ab-ove: I III, conclusf.ons and Recommer.dations: Basea o,ri this st3ff review of the environmPntal ctiecklist, the staff: A.Cor.cludes that therz are no potentfally si-gnificant adverse impacts ~ anul fecom-ner.ds/issues ,3 prcposed declaration of nonsignifir_ancP. B. Concludes that th?re are nc poter.tially si5nificant adverse impacts and, because of the nacure of the proposal, recommends/issues a fir.al declara Cion cf nons ign{fic3nce . Concludes that poteatfally signif:cant adverse imDacts co exist and recommend s/is sues a declaration ot significance. iV. Staff inember(s) revi ewi ng cher_k' i st ~ --7y _ • M M - L ECEIVED . S,~a , File # PAAY 1979 . Sec' ~ cNY IRON}~NTAt. ChECKL IST N ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ I ~tion: ihe State CAV~r"OM~liC~~ po11c/ Act ot 1471. Chaqter 43.21C, ACN. reautns all stats and icul goverm+ental •~~~i co constdtr e~+virvmaental vaiues Dotn tor their owm actions and when 11ce++sing private 2roposais. The Act also nquires that en Enviromenul Iaqact Statee+ent be prepered for ill aejor actlons siqntftcantty (artG "advtnely". as Def '04 197-10) attecting tha Quallty of Ue phySlul snvironmt. The auraese of this checklist ts :o nleQ :he agenctes tn- volved Catamine rtktroer or not a praRosal 4s such i nrjor actlon. Pttaie inswor the faltowing questions •i taOpletaty •s you can with the informetion oresently ava11aD1e Co /ou. ?leise answr qwstlons as "yes" or '!myoe' it. in your o0inion, aven only 511ght tmpacu w111 result. The reviewers of tht checklist wi11 p* awan cf and wntarn :he,nstlves with the d oi iapect. askinq you for more tntormatlon. tf necessary. Wnere explanaLlons ot your answitrs are navired. or imnere you tie teve an explanat{on weuid be helptui a governmt Gecislon-voken . inciude your expianation in tr+e space provloea. or use~aaaltianel eacts, if necessar+►. You shouid inciuae references :o any rroorts or siud4es of rnicn you art a++ar* and wl+icn 3re rtTerant to che ans»ers you provtda. Comiete answers :o :hese vuestlons ncw wi1i hllp 311 a4er+cies fnvoived rtth yaur proaosal to wrdertnke Che required envirormiental revieN wlthout unnec:ssary deiay. lit foitdrinq quostlons svoly to your tow 1 proposal, rtot lust to the licenie for weicn rou are cur*ently iapiytng or the oro- aosai for wntch aoproval is sauqnt. rour answen shoulo incluco the iaQacta rhich w11i 0e causea tiy your prooosai Nnen it is caaipleted, even thouqn comietton may not accur unt:i sometirre in the fucure. This wi11 a11Qw ai1 ot th• agencies 5.htcti wtit b@ inrolvea to canale*.a tneir environmntal review ne+r. ri thout dupllcatinq paper+rorfc in *_ne future. Na aaPilcation shall de procassea untit :he cnectllst has Deen caaoiatea and rrturned to tne toaroorlau :aur+cy lapar--nent. Staq 1aw *eautrej axolanactons *or sye '.ves" ana t~" answer on !hQ r xttst. The person comolttiiq ;.a far~n i+ey oe reQutrea to 7rovidt t~cp►anattans ior no ansrers. and Tn sCme cases. -nure detaMa :nfornation to aid in atnnsnoid aetermtnatton. vOTE: Th1s 1s a Stundard fonw being usa4 by a11 statt and local 3gsncits +n cne .itata ot 'Aafhtngton `or variaus Lypes of _ prooosals. !4ny ot the questions u+ir not aooly co your propou 1. it a cutstion Qots not apaiy. ;ust 3nswer it 'ro" an0 CDntinue on t0 :he ntxL Cuestlon. =."(ViROKKElITAL _NEC)CL;ST =aRl1 1. 3AC XGit0UlY0 Mam of Proponent: Earl Hoover a'ione .4maef 924-1234 z, aaa";s 0f pr000r++nt: E8121 Spraque Oate Checkiist SuOmittsa: i. Aqency Qequirlnq Chetklist: ~ L~ 0 y ~ -NL r In nri I rij 5. "t~ne of Prooosai. tf appiIcaoie: 5. Ucuro and 3rief Oescr!otion af trit ropasai ,inciua ng :uz noc 1lemte0 Lo 1ts stZe. 4enerai atsign eieiiw+ts. sne other fac'.ors '.hat wtll glve an acturate undersunaing of itt scopt 3nd naWrs): 3 lot replat of a 1 acre lot 1. ~.x:itlon of Proposa) ~Cascribe :s+e ahysical zet!1ng ot :ne prooosal. as wei1 as :*e !xtenc of :he lana ir!a ar!acttd ~y 3nv sr►vironmentai lmoacts. tnc'ueing any other infonRacton neeaed to give an accurste unaerstan0inq of che environ- iental sattfng ot tm proposai): E85n al k l . 3. Estlaatea Oace far Caepletian of the Proposal: 6month,$ 9. Jst af ail aers+tt5. Licsnsts or Governnwt AODrovais Reouireo tor the aroaosai (federill. sute dna iocal - inc`udinQ mZones): Hearinq Examiner Committee acceQtance Qf prelimin Board of County Commissioners acceQtance of final plat (IF SPACE FOR EXpl.At1AT*.ON i5 (NAOEQiIATE. OLEASE ar%•CH AOOITIONAI. aAGE5.) 10a. W you, ar the ornrr tn sht ewne you do not a+n tne suDject lena. naw anr olarts tor !ucure a4ditions. exaanztan, 4r furtner attivlty rtiaud Lo or :onnec:ad rith thls prcposal? ►f yts, ex0iain: No 10b. Jo ±ou own or nave optians ~n !and rtearby or aQjitent :o thls crooasal's lacation? :f Ies. exolatn: rro . i:. b you know of any plans by otheri fnc3ualnq the wnlr ahtch nny •ffect tive A*'flvertY cawred br your proposai or land ;qjactnt or ne4roy? If yes. exolain: No . 'c". At:ach arty otriof aoRilucton fors triat has been coa+oleted reoarolno :ne ar,coasai; if none nas tcen comolecee. but is exoectad :a be fi1ed at saios futurs date. drscrtOr the nature of suct+ a0oiication fvne: N/A 11. :NY IRONM£KTA1. I"tPAC; 5 (Exotanations af ill °'yes" and "=yoe" 3nswers ara reouirad) Yt►S MavO! '1C i. car:r. u111 the proposal rssuit 1n: ;a) Unstable earth condiNons or in changes in geolo9lc SLl'UC:'Jr'!SZ . • • • . . • • 15... (D) Jisruottens. a1s01acanee+ts. coa+aaction or ov*rcoversnq ot the so11? . . . . . . . ,JL_ (c) Otange in tc0ograOny or grnurta surface reliei stetures? . . . . . . . . . . . . XL - (C) The astruc.tion. _overing or wdtffcation of aay uniaue geologic ~ or physical teatures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1,al any irtcresse in wind ;,r wattr sresion of soits. either on or uff t" s`.te? . . • • • _ x ~ . ~ { IF 540!(PLyHATIOl1 IS t."IAOEOWI?E. Pl.EASE Ai7AC}i A440 4GFS. J ~ (f) Chanqes in :eposition or erosion of beaca sdnds. or ,:hartaes 1n stitatton, . caoositton or rrosion whlch nay modtfy the channei of a r-ver or sLre" or the bed of :tto oCfott or 3ny bay, tnlet ar ldke? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ruptanatton: Construction of new homes and roads will overcover soil. ~ Slight modifications in existinq topography may occur. It is likelv that durinq construction, asmal amount of erQSion will ncclir 2. Air, w111 the propOSal rtsult in: ~ Ma y" y~ (a) Atr aaissions or dturtoritton of aebient a1r awllty? . . . • • • • • • • • ~ - (b) The creatfon of objectlansble odan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alteretlcn of tir movawt. noiswre or toweratur+e, or inr ci+ange in cltoau, ettner iacally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Upl,n,t,on: Durinq and after construction„ metorized vehicles will bP an and about the propertv. 1. ilattr. 'ai l i ttn Droposai r'tsul t t n: Y_ Y°- ( a) Change 1 n cwrer+ts, or tlie courst or di rectt on of water mo+►ewts. x i n e f ther Mr1 ne or tresh wi ters t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in aosorptton rates. Qratnsqe Rstters, or the race and eeount of suriace water rwafi? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (c) A1 ttraci ons to tte coune or f1 ow of fl ood raurs? X ( a) Chanqe t n ctm uoun t of s wface w: tar i n anv wacw oody ? )L (e) 01soarqe into surtice watar, or in iny aitcration of sueface waur oualtty, incluatnq but noc 1teN te4 co tamoracun , aissoived ~ OxY9ln 0r Lurbtdity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (t) Atteratton of the d1 nction or rate of flow of qrvund waters? (9) Change in tne qwntt:y of gound r+aurs, eigner thrcuqn aimt adoltiarts ar witharaaals, or Chrou4h in[sr*.oOtSon of an aquiter by cuts or excavations' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (h) DeuHoretion tn qround »ater -juality. either tnrougn atrect fnjectioe+, or :hrouqh :he slWaqe of 13acnate. phaspstes. deteraents, ratrrborne virus or oacwia. or ott+er suostinces ~ into :he 9ouna waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (t) Raductian in Lhe uount of water otherwiso availaDle for ~ • puDlit wur suCPlfes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ =x01dllac,on: New homes and roads wi11 sliQht1v modifv absorQtinn rat r, of rm,1 _ Street, stQrm dra i naqg_h,i 11 mAd ' i ~ - ~ or3. Mill tM proDOS resuic i Na e No ~ la1 «lanqe in the dtvenity of SQetlts, or nlsocer of any Soetlts of •flora (includinq tnes. snruas. qnss, cro0s, microflore ana d0uatlC Disnts)' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - %'b) Reauctlon of the nuroars of any untaue. rare or endanqered soocies of flcra.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (c) IntroQUCtlon of new species of !lora ;nto an area, or in a Darrier *A tne norn+sl repienisnwt of extst1nq species.' . . . . . . . . . . _ (C) Raduc:fon in atrNqe of anr igr4CUltural croP? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ JL Exptanatton: New homes wi 11 1 i kel v des i re veaetati on dDDUrterlant tn housing. _ t 5. =auna. 4i11 Che aroDOSai -esuTt tn: res Mavtie vo (s) crunQes in tha dlverslty ar soocles, ir numftr of iny swies of fauna (birds, land aniails intlu0inq repciles. fish frra sM11t1sh. Ou+thlc crganisas. fnseccs ar +elcrofaunal? . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (D) ReCuctton of che nuwws of any unt0ue. rare. ar endangered soecies of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Inuoduction of neM spectes of tsura tnto an area. or rssult ~ 'n a I."ar*ier Co tt~o otiqr:tfQn or hovesdont vt fsunat . . . . . . . . . . . X fl (d) Oetet'-,oration of tnistlnq fish or wiidi9fe hi0iU t? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X V Ezslanation: Some change i n di vers i t,y of animal 1 i fe ma he ex ected ~5 G D ra as a result of homesa e~pec ~,allv rodent varlettes ~ 5. Noise. ~ 1108voe Vo (a) '~t11 ►he orooosal fncrease existing noise levetsl . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _Xoianattan: Appurtenant to nQw housina. . Jqnt and 'l are. ~s !'avice va ~ (a) Will che Orooossl pnQuce new lignt or giare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ Exaianation: Porch 1 i qhts and s treet 1 i qhti nq wi 1 1 shPd some 1 i 9ht on the area. 2 , -WE . • • ( IF ft-!- EXPI.AKATtQN [5 INAOEQUATE. Dl.EA5E ATTACH •'.0 i . 3AGES. ) i 8. L3nd so (a) Wilt the proposal rtsuit 1n the •iteration of the oresenc or planned Iand so of n area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X L~- ExD1anaLi0n: ~ f~ 9. t~atral 4osourc4s. W111 tft prooosal result in: r~s maYbe 'b (a) Incnaso tn the rste of usa of any na wral resourcas2 . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ X_ L (b) OeDletton oi nonrenwaDle Ztural resourcei . . . . . . . . . . . X- eaw anaN n• . . . . A._ i0. R1sk af tlaset. Coes the proposil inval w a reSk of an exoloston or the ~ !Irae Mo n ease o nuardous su0s;an as (incluainq, but not timited to, 011, pastfcides, chamluts, ar redtatlon) jn the event af an 3ccident ar uosot canot t1 ons t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - X- ExQlsnatlcn: 11. PoQUlatton. ~ ha c* No Wfll the propasal tlter ttit loCttfon, dlztrlbutlan. density, cr qroi.th rau of the Auuan ocDulatlon of an ireat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - €xplanatton: New houses wi 11 attract new LLCnnc 12. »ousinq. W111 the prooosil affect lxfstinq houstng, ar crsate e desnnd far Idditiondl nousing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . } - Exol,naciWA11 add new duplex to the neiqhborhood. 1 13. Trensportatlon/Cfrculatlon. Will the oroposal result in: Yes !hvbq ~ (a) Generetfon ot a0dltional wMicular movsent? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Etfet:s on existinq psrklnQ tacilitles. or deund for now oarktng? x (c) Smoact upon exisclnq transDOrtation systtss? . . - . . . - . • . • . • • • . x _ (d) Aitcrattons to prosertt pacUrns ot circulation or nnvewt . of peoole and/or goodst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Alteratlons w vsteroorne. ra11 0r atr trattict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ f) :ncrease tn :rafflc hazeros to motar vehlcies. oicyct ists or pedestrlans? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X _ EX,,dnAt,,~: "Jew home owners wi 11 1 i kel v have aytqmobi 1 es r ia. Pueitc Services. `d111 :ne 2roposal uve an eftect uoon, ar result tes !tavDe .40 tn a neea for ne++ or altered 4overmnentai servtces !n any Ot of :re, t'oi 1oMing areas: (a) Fire ProLC:',ont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - ~ (D) Pol ics protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ( c ) Sctioo i s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x (d) parks or other recrfatior+ai factllNes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (t) Maintenancs of public facllfttts, inciudlnq roadst . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ( f ) Other governmenn 1 senr1 ca ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ :olenae,oll: New homes wi 1 l require -ne abnvP nHhl ir cPrv,cQ,c (IF SFACE FOR EXPUUWtIOM IS IftAOEOJAiE. OLEASE aTTaGH i00i?i0rrat. aaGES,) 15. E"ray. a111 the prooosai resuit in: ils yavee ~e) Use afi suostanctai amur+u of fuel ar enmrgy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (b) 3enund upon !xisttnq sourcfs of tntr9Y. or rr0uirt x the dew 1 ovn~+t of naw saurces oi encrqy? . . . . . . :xoianatfon: During and after construction, the new homes will reQUire existing energy sources, i.e. power, oil and/or gas, etc. 16. 'Jtllities. `aill the praoasai resuit ',n a neea for nsM systena. res yaroe Vo or altsrations :o the `oitowlnq utilities: ; a ) power or nature 1 qas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x- - ; 0 l tamun i ca Li on sys u~s' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ - ;c) Waur? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - id! Sewer ar saotic canKSt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ _ !el Starm Maur arainaqa? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ 3 to FOR EJCPLARtT:OrI :s :ruACECt1aTZ. 'IEAsE A80MFL PaGE:.; • ` ; f ) :o l i d waSU u►a d150osi 1 ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ I ~la,at,on: The vari ous uti 1 i ty d i stri cts wi 11 need to modi fy thei r $vstem, to accomodate the new residences. res ~iYOe No 17, mH lth. Y111 the prvposal resuit 1n the creatton o{ 3ny heattn tiazardr p~ttn tai Alalth haZird (excluQlnq mwL 1 heiith)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X zCxoianatlon: , 18. Aestne Tcs. aill vu proposal resuit in the oostructton ot iny scenic vista or 7-iew oien to the Pub11C. or will the OroPosel result 1n the treatton of an X aestMtfcaliy oNOnslvo i1U open W puoltt vfau? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ExplanaNon: , 19. . tian. W111 the oroposal rt:ult in en tnpatt upon th! qw tity or 9 ty of exlttin9 retrta[tonal oppottunitits? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Exclanetion: 20. Arc?evlo tcaiiNistortcnl. Ii11 the oropasal result in an aiteration ot , YK Ma~" sa S gnt unt archeoioqtcal or histarical ;tte. structure. objett or bulldinq? ~ Explanatjon: . : : . S I GJtATl1RE tne undarStgned, syear undar the peniity of per)ury tnat the aDOVe resRCnses are macs trutntully and :a tRe wst of my rnowleage. f a1sa unden tand :Rat. shoula then be any rillf en sreQresencatton ar w1l;ful ladc af fult disciasuro on my oart.5pokane County may witttidraa snr loclsntton nslgn~flcanu th"t it m g~+t fssue rn rs i i anca upon thi s tt+ecK 1 i st. ,5 - z - T l~' a.oca,er+c: ~ ~ ' - - Oace: (Pltas! prlnt or Ty0!) Proponent: Earl Hoover Adams: FR1?1 ~orT a~ a ;hone: 424 -12,l 4 aenon m.ojsting fors: Thomas Sl ade pho„e; 924-3759 Oaparasen : or Ofii u ot Courrcy Rev t ew t ng :hoc1c 11 s t: SLaff t+emer(s) Revirrinq Chetkl ist: i 4 . ' J . ~ • ~ ' . ~ ` , . . , . . _ une 3 Noover . ~ 06 , ~ . _13ig~-7'9, . _ . , E 4th ~ ~a~ g~2 ~epla'~ . PE . : . 11003 ~as. , g . • Naa'~er . . SpoV'ane' Re : F-arl ted. ~as been - ~~d ooy~r: • fln pn east A~ essary re`~~~ ~re' , . . . . pear . ~ ~ subd~~v~s,Th,~ rec fyle fQr , : r ~~.--3 I°t his Qff;Ce' ived and the - , . our p~'~osa1 ° hear j rig by 5 ~~S bQen rece f or subdi vi S~ . ~,genci e of ~ by -C°u~t ~ s c°~p1 ete ~ r~~ - ~ SAg'~- Q~earing ~ S• ~nCe , . . ~ ~ . } Amj nary , "ubbard tratar n~ s . ~ . ~ _ ° ' ~ ~ . - . - t`la~ 1 ~ • ~ on, Admi Subdi V I S , . " . , . . - ~ . . . . . - . . . fy ECEIVED ~ . seweragc A1 ternative s M A2 9 1979 ~ 1ots loso gal? o►i pcr aay SP(}KANE COUNTY _76 3 L.f. drain i.l.e1.c1 i'IJANNING DEPARTMENT Thiee altCrT7atlvLaS aor sew3ge disposal :-iill. be anatysed: (1) qn-si.te se~.~i:ic tank (2) Commt a nity se pt_ a c ta nk (3) Community pac}:3ge treatencnt pli-inl; (1) Qn-site septxc tank Canital cosr.s z @ 7lnnual costs Pumping @ 3 year intervals $co Drain Field renlacement @ 10%/Xr lRe-) g'atal c& M annua? costs $ 7 41o (2) C;(?Yt1i11Ui?1.l".y septic tanlc Cln-ltal COStS (Esr. ) a qallon mu? ti-chambEr t-apx install.ed Li£t siati-on %=;ith appu; tenanees - Drain fxelcl @L. L. 79 9 8" n SG'WC'a:3ge l.ine 25-0- L. E. @ ~ ``~•~o ~°~o manholes @ $ V ~ C1Cati Out I,Oss O~ <3 lOt - $ Ann»a1 G & M cost.s E~uiripinc~ (~~st. ) $ ~~o Drain field replacemen -u Pera.odic J.zne cleanang Elcctrical u pLii~p maintenance `Co~al Q & M annual costs $ ? '9/• 4,o ~ / ~ r 1 ~ Page 2 (3) Community package treatment plant Capital costs Lift station, aeration chamber, clarifier and chlorination chamber . with necessary appurtenances $ /D1ooa Drain field 7g18" sewerage line 7 ~ manholes ~ cleanout Zoa Loss of lot (s) ~ $ IZ~87 Annual O & M costs Pumping clarif ier $ ~0.0 Drain f ield replacement 78.70 Periodic line cleaning 6'Z ,,S'o Electrical, pump and tank maintenance /,ooo Total annual O& M costs $ 1AL-90 The following table summarizes the costs associated with the three alternative sewage waste disposal systems considered: Annual Cost/Unit Capital Cost/Unit On-site septic tank $'90,00 $ t~4~-o Community septic tank `1t,3j Community package treatment plant q 7I~f 3 3 2 9, 6~ , ~Pc C, v s e- ~ ~ ~ e K,~~ b o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ D ~ ~ e ~ c~ e ~ S ,A!~;o V - ~ ~ U \ n . ►i ' - 1 n • ' , ' • ~ ~ ' J RECEIPT Date ~A^ a.,•.a 19 2442 Received From O4o/\ t~ (4-t3,1 w Ad d re ss 1 100 3 4R'` ) gmti:.e~ Lv Q~t ~0•~ Dollars $z;~-70, n Fo r OnAt~w~ v\, Q~ h'e e- Ici s', 60; 3 . " ~S ~ ve~ -131 1 - - ~ ~ _ ACC+~UNT 7 HOW PAID AMT OF I I CASH ~ I ~ ti ACCOUNT AMT PAID I CHECK ANCE I MONrY Bv 6 DUE ~ 8KS06 Redif~rm ORDER 1 , ~ !.egal Description For Job flo. 1381 ~arl Hoover Replat Pnay 29, 1979 1 Lot 3 Block 8 of Harringtons ,'lddition to Hutchinson as ner plat thereof recordeci i n Vol ume S nage 1 of "Pl ats" i n the off i ce of the Spokane County Auditar. ' ~ _ ` IT - ~ D nxa ! ~ ' t~s ~ • omoooa o0 L L Q~~ ~ C Z liii . 1 ~ J tdc~ SPOKANE CFlVltl 1 ' YLq,tl,U9NG DEPARTIV•bNT PC.,~3~~_ EX$IB I T A ~G E ,'Z E V E emINARY PLAT APFLICATION F`ORri t ~ .~DrM ALI, SIGNATOR~ , M?AGES 2 Al'JD 3) MIIST BE FII.LID IN, IF APPROPRIA~, B~'CIRE RETU~NItIG TO THE FLAT ZT~N~ STRATOR. SPOKAN OU PLANNING WK~TAENTlo Nbe comFletad by applicant and stirveyor AREA AND D7~,STANCE'~•'~`*«~*.~~s~*s.~.**~~~r***#***#~s*~~~*****~****~*:*#*rt***~**~*~.*«s~s~w.«r.**~ss Total amount of land in this Subdivzsion: 0.90 acrss Total 1Vumbe^ of Lots 3 Proposed den-city of the Plat : 3.0 i:o t-s/Gross Ac: e Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: ~ Acres PMoposes Use of controlled adjoining land: • What is the driving distance in milee to the nearest fire station? Shopping facilities? 2.~ Municipal Boundary: ~ n Paved etreet or highway 0 LAND IISE:*::+:***s**::~*:~***~:*~*:~~~.***«****s~**s~*.~*~:~~~*:•~**~s•***~*~**#*:~~:,«~~:~►~*.**~ Indicate the proposed land use of the plaz: Single Family Dwellings ( x Duplexes ( X). Indicate lots for duplexes: 5ee ol t mao Mul.ti-fami.ly dwelli.ng units ( Indicate trhich lota: Mobile Homes ( 4ther ~ Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: 4-s the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List type of uses: Cultivated lan3: acres. Pasture: acres. limber : acres. Vacant: acres. Other : 2 S.~. uwe M nQs Acre s Is keepi-ng of anirr,als desired? No C x). Yes C Type : II'~'~PR0~1E'►VTS*:~*~~~*~**~*~*~*~**~*.~***~~~•***~~~x~~x*~*,.wx~**~w.~~,~«~*,~~.~.~*.*.,:***.*~*,-.*~ Do you plan to file tne Flat in i ts entirety eLs propoeed, or will ifi be anulti-phase dsve- Iopment? Ma;y wi sh to phase To what level of improvement will stirests be constructed? Gravel ( x)- "zinimum. Curb and Gravel ( Curb azd Paved ( Paved or.].y ( I?escribe any combinations of aboce: Private ►^oad What is the time period expected for coaplete development of the Plati: 6 rnoni:hs St,reet improvements completed? o rnonths. Substantial number vf lots oc--upied`? ~ monfhs Is dedication of any land for public use conte;apleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( x). Yes ( Describe: Iadicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Square fest vumher oi becirooma • Est~.r~ia -ed ~a~_e PricE . 417. blull-din~s be bui lt on t}:e lots Le_or- thc~;r :::z'~ No ( xYes ( WIl- ann:y Uee-i b4 _nc, uded-1 2.n v}:e Jnl e l.'1 lOTiJ^ rYo x f• YPrs ~ I f "ye s" , e x-Dlain : U'~.'~,1T~'~JJ«s~•• s~r,*~R::Y*+s=+s~s:s sa:s~ a:~.*~.. at ~ *sz •t. ~R ss.« * s s• _ ss *.a** w: * *rrt~t+t• ~ ={s:ak * Ia,.44cate the proposed method o: sewage a-is: osal : Septic tank ( x i. 1+agoOII ( )Treatnient plant ( )o Other, or cambinations (Dascribe) I Ind?.cate '-he proposed source of water supplST: Indivi.duai we11s ( Public system ( x )rrivate commvn;ty system C Tnd..icate method of extendiag service to the lots (Dwel-ings)'' Underground u l;;i3ity easements ( Overhead utility ea.semerLt-s ;K;. UtIlities in strsets ( Nc easement~-~ ( i. Indicate tihe _~_otance frocr, L~:is ~ roccsal ~e ~,`:e -ea^eEt e~.sfi~~g water ma~n: D ieet - IndicaiE s~ ze of nea~~PJri. Ta_n: ~nc~a: , -0'drR- _ ~ ► ~ L ob ~ ExH IBZT A FRELIMIlVARY PLA'L APP'LICATION FORM (Continued) Faga Z UTILIT~..~i - CContinued)***s*~**r~***~*r~***r***s*w~**+~*********~********~********s****~**swr*s*+~s* List utility compan.ies or districts expected io pravide service to this Plat: E- ectricity: V:WF' • Gas : ?d/ ~ Water : Prone : PIJB ~J.. tt j~:~ 5.-~~ri•D. AC'i{NOWLEDGNIII~TTS*~****~***~***s*~**~**f*s*******:ss*s*~3~~~*~***~*:~**~*s*~'~~*+r*tf*~s~~~.*~~*~*** PROPOSID PLAT NAME : ~►2.~~'~ I, the undersigned, have complete3 tha i.nformation requested, and the Prelilr.i.narf Plat has been pr ed by me under my supervisio in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane Co Degartment and the 1 s o the State o W tine ~~o ~s . (Signed) • a e : ~ 49. ~ o~ • (Address) E9803 SpraquQ Phone: 924-3759 Spokane, Wa. Zip: 99206 .a+~ . c~~ °Ha L Laa° . su8 • . I, tne undersigned, swear under the nenalty c~f perjury that the above resgonses are made truthfully and to the beEt of my knowledge. I further swear that I At~; THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here- with is written perrnission from sa.id owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, shoul3 there be an willful raisrepresentati-on or willful lack or fui.l disclosure on my part, Spoka.ne Count may withdra a.ny declaration of non significz.nce that it might issue in reliance upo his c c',t. (Signed) - • Date: ~ 2 71 (Address) ~9/ Phone: ~2 1-og2 `o zip: NOTARY Date : ~ 2 `f ' NOTAkY SEAL : s** sss:s *s**# ~e.s~s~~ s s st srts 7!aRSi ~is+k*s s#+R*#Icr~ssts*sstae.k~s*tsyt*#:s*at~tt*t~a,t~:R*ac*.:i+Rt*:,es.st #as1~:■ Part II -;.o be completed 'oy ~yater purveyor A. This subdivision is (is not) situated within our service areaa B. W e a_ not able ) and willing to supply thi e auhdivisian w-i th adequate water for domesti fire (industrial) (commerciali uses. C. Satis actory arrangement (h3ve) ave no~ been made to ser7e this proposalv D. Si~ture (onlY when itemE A, B~u are true and comuleted) (/t~ ~1•.~~~ps ~ S ~ . C I - P: s~ i~ .~.z purveyo^s name signature a.nd title j, F!,r date ~ S-r4(~ 711~ s~s***~**********~~.~*~****~**s*******s*~**~****~**►****s**=*~**~s****s*r*,ss**s*****~*M*~*~a**~ Part IlI-to be cor.mleted 'oJ Hezlth District A. Heaith District staff has complete3 a field :.nvest-ia3tion of tre 3. uealth District requirements for 'prelimi:na.mr -alat _ ave ve r.^ t; bee.: 3-attiLs:ied. C . C~i,=a rur - - ~ ~ c7/ si3nature adid title ~ s~~cssF*+e*7sew#Ic#~~qc*#at*ft*#~#*kk*kMss#Mk+MK:stMKt+kR*acYtM**akMkM###kiit~c~t#t+htlkrkk**M#!#kR**#**##i+►=~t~t ~ E X$ I 3 I T A PRFLMINARY P'LkT AFFLIGATION F08M (Continued) Page 3 .*~*~~~*.**~*~***~r~«**~**s~s*:*~*s##s**,~~*#~~**s~r**~:#*►s:s#*:.*.:*s~s:*~~s******s:~*#~*:~.* Part N- to oe completed by County Engineers Office A. County r,ngineers Office requirements for preliminary plat ha~ (have not) been satisfied. B. Signature - ~ ' ture and title date r ►~#tr*#*A~Itlci~[i!##k1Kik*t7l~sti#t1t#*!*+M*#*l+ksl~7it~t*~►fis~tR*t#+M***t##**~*M~71*7~~trit*+k«*l~i*~#+1#*R~►#lR~► Part V- to be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County IIiilities Department requirements for preliminary plat,Aiave (have not) been satisfied. t~ ~ H. Signature . , ~ . signature and title date ' ,ez:~y~*~R*#~Frc*i~+krc***ksit~Fs#sait*sM~lc*#R~t1RttMc~+fM*#tt#I*M*#f~at:sR:ka«~#Mk+k*#*t#rc~r#tRF+tk**+h*#sc~#s~k This oar t- to be completed by Plarmi.ng Depa..rttr;ent Plannin(~ Department Information ,,y~ . Date Submitted : ~/l ~ 2I~ 11? y Preliminary Plat Fee : l'jr,.5-- 4- AS Date accepted : MA-4V 2 1 4 117 ~ Checklist Fee : o Plat File No.:-F6-131~ -7~ Zone Change File No. A)Dn)9-- Plat Name:fAp /{00 ✓e-K XEA47 Existina Zoning : , _4, A?UC~~~ Nlu.rnber of Lots : 3 Jate Established : l clSu Location : Sec. ~ T Advertised Zone Change : 1t~/3q~ .~?r _ ~ School District 1/,,(~ 3b--'-) Checked by : c Hearing Date: ~iL A ~ ~~7 ~ r " ~ 1l r t^ .j. ~ ~t rll PRELIMINARY PLaT CONFERENCE CHECKLIST Return thi s sheet wi th the A 1 i cation ~ aP ) • ~ , Date of Conference : c~5- Sec : /J0 Twnshp. ZS Range 4/4/ IVED Total Acres: ar. No. of Lots ECE _ r,.~ ~ ~ Proposed Pl at Name ? SPOKA+NE CO~N~ENT PtANNING OEPARTM J APPLICANT' S NAME/drn .S/adc ADORESS: PHONE: 376 f Zip: F5i.;? A: iNE FOLLOWING OOCUMENTS SHALL 8E SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE DLANNING DEPART- MENT FOR HEARING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, EXPLAINED IN DETAIL ON THE INFORMATIOF+ REQUIREMENTS HAND-OUT SHEET: ~ FULL PRELIMIPJAP,Y PLAT FEE ($195.00 + 55.00/lot: Maximum 5750.00) PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE ( ) _ 1. PLAT APPLICATIOtJ (EXHIBIT A) (Al l signature blocks complete) ~ w 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( EXHIB IT B) ( Si gned surveyor' s stamp ) i, le - ~A . ENGINEERS SECTION MAPS (EXHIBIT C) {With parcel LJ _.k. ASSESSORS SECTION MAP (1) (EXHIBIT 0) (Show other owned or optioned land) 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT MAPS (6) (EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required) A. 2 RLACKLIPJE COPIES (DO NOT FOLD BLACKLINE PRINTS) ( B. 4 BLUELINE COPIES a--5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS (EXHIBIT F) , CAJSEWAGE STUDY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives) A.2 WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water service) B. STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS (If required by Engineers) C. LANDSCAPING PLANS (Required when land use conflicts might occur) D. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If required by Engineers) _ 2,1--.17. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHI6IT G~__ ($60.00 ~Fee Required) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ST F7 REV I EW OF PROPOSAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , A. UNIQUE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATI!RES: i` 8. CULTURAL RES4URCES:_~014-IN ~ C. COMMENTS: ~?'V~0_0 ~ -attf"Jt~ -`1.-= ~ , ~ ~P,~ ca.-.:~" wQ.~$.a -~:•~i.c~ /c~t rno t L¢.e r~ 4 ~v c~ ; . ~ Ct4 ~ 1 ~ . ~-~!_x- ,7' ,T i r l , 1. . • ~ (ly~- ~~.L (,lo-r~= oa te : ' x ~ P1 at Admi ni sLrator ~F PE-1319-79 , A Ilearing to consider the application of Loren E. Hoover, E 8121 Sprague, Spokane, Wasiiington, 99216 to file a plat to be known as Earl Hoover Replat. The property being platted is described as! Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44 EAJ f1. Lot 3 alock B of Narrington's Addition to Hutchinson as per plat thereof recorded in Voluine S page 1 of "Plats" in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, (Located in the Spokane Valley between Bessie and Sargent and south of Alki Avenue). VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) t /A 1~15 ~ -/L4 Q f~/;14& , Being first duly sworn, deposee and says: That at a11 times mentioned herein ne was, and now is, a citizEn of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso That on 19 7 he PersonallY P 3 osted three true and correct copa'es of the hereto attaclied'NOTICE OF PUBLIC HFARING at the following plads in Spokane County, to-wit: 2. L- - ~ z:) Subscri'aed and sworn to me ° 1979 • '~T' v~ / . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHING~04 Re siding at Spokane, Washington ~ ~ ~ er ~ ~ ■ a 4 AG~~J~A, ~]uly 31, 7 979 TEL~PHOIV~. ~5b-2~0~ SP~~1,CdE ~~~I~JTY PL~~JIaIPd~ ~l1B~IVISI~~~ HEltR~N~ E~tA~1I~lER C~D~1PI~TTEE ~ E~~ ~ T~~1~: Tut~day, J~ly 31, 1973 - 9;00~ A.~1, ~It~rn ~3 ~n ~~lorni~ng Ag~n~~a PL~CE; ~raad~r~~~ C~ntre Building, ~nc~ Floor ~~1~~ r1 7~~ J~ff~rson, ~~okar~e ~ ~ PRELIfi~~II~RRY SUBf~IV1SI~~1~~ ~ : P~-13~ ~~7'9, ~Af~l. H~~UER ~E~'L~T ~ a. Lvcat~an: Th~ pr~p~~~1 ys loc~~ed ir~ t~t~ 5~~~~ne Vall~y ~ ~e~~~e~n ~es~ie and Sarg~nt ~ sout~ of Al ki J1ve. Lega1 ~~s~riptian; S~ctian 18, Tn~r~s'~ip ~SP~, Range ~4 ~.L~I.s1. l~~t 3, B~o~k $ o~ ~larr~ngton's Addativn t~ ~~~ut~hin~on ~s ~~r~ ~lat th~r~af recorded i~ Volur~e S page 1 of "Pla~,s" in ~h~ o~~Fice af ~he ~pakane ~~unty ~ucii~a~ i c. ~,~~ns~r: L~ren E. H~ov~r E ~$l~l Spra~u~ : S~~k~ne, W~1. ~9~16 d. S~tru+~y~r: ~avid C. C~aus~r~ ~ ~ ~~~13 ~prague Sp~~;~ne, W~4. 992(~~ e. S~i te Si ze: . 9 a~r~s P~ur~b~er af Lo~~: 3 I g. Pr~pa~sed L~~~ kJse: Sinc~l ~ fami ly d~r~11 i ngs ~n~ du~l h, ~xisting ~onin~r Agricuatural S~burb~n 1, 4~at~r Sour~e; Hut~hin~on Irri~ati~n D~~~rict j . ~chool ~i s~ri ct # ~~est Ual l~y ;#3~6~ ' I~et~~d c~f ~~s~r~g~ D~sp~sal ~ Ir~dividual on-site ~ept~c tanks l. ~nvirar~r~enta~ In~~a~~t; A topic o~ dis+~~c~s~~~ at ~has H~~rir~g may ~ ~~lhether th~e N~ar~ ng Exa~i r~er Cc~m~~ ttee ha~ a~de~u~~e inf~rn~a~iQn t~ ~as~~ss the adv~rse ~nvironm~rital Ir~pacts a~ the pr~po~al. Tk~e St~at~ Enuironmer~ta~ P~l i~~ ~1~t ~JA~C 197-~~~53~ ~2~ pr~uid~s ~h~t: , . , ,In ~ ~ the ~v~nt th~t the further ~nves~ig~tians au~hori~e+d by thi~ ~ection da not pr~ovide ir~formatian r~a~onably suffi~i~nt t~ a~~es~ ar~y pot~nt~~l ~dvers~ , ~enviran~~~r~tal i~~7pac~s a~' th~ praposal, an EIS ~~a11 be p~~p~rec~i," ~ ~ I ~1~1~~ ~rs~r~ ~