1989, 08-04 CUE-27-89TO .
Spokane County
Department of Building & Safety
JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
, Planning Department
FROI I om Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator
DATE: /2 �� / j "j
RE File Number:
Address:
Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked
box(es) below:
r—i The applicant shall contact the Department of Building and Safety at the earliest possible stage of
L_J
design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department;
e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access.
roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations, and general coordination
with other aspects of project implementation.
U The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is required.
F-1
U Requirements of Fire District No. need to be satisfied during the building permit process.
n The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of
y Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Building and
Safety determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of
Building and Safety feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shall
participate and cooperate in this process.
• The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction
LJ and proximity of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the
minimum fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required.
f—i We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions.
u
r--1 Specific comments are as follows:
L__J
TLD
WEST 1303 BROADWAY
• CP(W A MP W A CUMICIT/WAI OCrIKA • Mcn
'r
SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
NOTIICIE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ZONIING ADJUSTOR ITU
DATE: August 23, 1989
TIME: 1:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department
2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM #: 9
File: CUE -27-89
1 di 1
ILIIC HEARING
1: 1 c . 1:. ILI
J. O C A T I O N : Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Marguerite
Road and Knox Avenue in the SE 114 of Section 7, Township 25N, Range 44EWM. The
property is addressed as EAST 8905 Knox.
PROPOSAL; The applicant proposes to place a duplex on a lot having approximately
15,000 square feet. Section 4.04.170 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance allows this
use with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit.
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural CROSSOVER : UR 3.5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban
SITE SIZE: Approximately 15,000 Square Feet
APPLICANT:
Karen Gertson
E. 8905 Knox
Spokane, WA 99212
ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST, POSSIBLY
CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS
ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON
THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF
RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A $100.00 FEE. (Sections 4.251)90 and 4.25.100 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.)
CUE -27-89
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Certificate of Exemption No.:
Name of Applicant:
Street Address: C �O5
e r'{' sa �.
Application No.: C- (-) F "177- 8
Agent: Y
City: DI� U State:Zip
o q' 2l i Phone - Home: ` 2a X47 3 Z
Code' Work' 9 a�- 6 3
Agents No.
Narne of Property Owner(s): S/. Lr e
Street Address:
Zip Phone - Home'
City: State: Code: Work:
REQUESTED ACTIONS) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s)
Waiver of Violation
Temporary • se tructure
Nonconforming Lot/Use
Other:
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Cite Regulations Section(s):
CODE: ORDINANCE_
. o4'. /7v
,/ Property Violation/
Section: —7 Township: 2-S , Range: 41T Size: IF, b Enforcement: Y 430
Existing Zone: /`-t Comp. Plan Des.: V Crossovdf e 5, S
LEGAL
PSSA:0 N UTA. N ASAON FIRE DIST.• CHECKED BY: 64
Hearing Date: -'I�j - 7'9 Personnel Taking in Application:
Existing Use of Property: lien d€(C a ( - » 9?OS' EX4 ,X.
Describe Intended Pro osal in Tgrrns of REQUESTED ACTIONS above: C�1Ztdr 61,t G
(f Se eery, 1( c- l/ n1.‹.) e_ D be c 1 iN D., rt c e l ice r
'ZDh -e
Street Address of Property: E 390f ,fit, a)C t -'ex)/ k,�
Legal Detscription of +P�rr�operty (ffinnclude easement, if applic ble): v A.[
dit
Parcel No(s): i715 +/ 4 D / 2 / Source of Legal:
41s-4751 /' S /^ems o r-cP1'
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor:
What interest do you hold in the property? r)o'i 'r5
tn, �P
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
x. Ine
1 SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS
ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO T i' BEST OF KNOWLEDGE.
;
40'0 E C. UDA
NOTAR SE,
•
:to
Signed:
Address: f_ kid S- w o
ate:
7.-4(1 --g
/c..c/'`�
9/i
z' Notary:
VP,e A` Date:
14/69
� s' •
ASO ���C�
Page 3 of 4 1.RY PU%'
(Over) Revised 3-4-88
A. j3IIRDEN OF PROOF
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons
why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic
case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action
(variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way
which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider, Please fill
the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the
Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
B. SIGN -OFF BY CQJJNTX DEEARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
a) Proposed method of water supply:
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal:
C -JA* //s(, #3
A prelim' ry •nsultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has been t, f•,... ed f requirements and stands
1(o-
Signature)
(Date) (Sign -off Waived)
COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
A preli i : a consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has be -i forme+ o5/ requirements and standards.
nature) (Date)
Sign -off Waived)
COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB)-— J
a
p
A preliminary
cant has b- n
c sulcation has been held to discuss the proposal.
�orm d of requirements and standards.
(Date) (Sign -off Waived)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of wa er system
requirements and standards.
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with ika. &
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards.
a) The proposal js/iionow_located within the boundary of our future
service area.
b) The proposal located within the boundary of our current
district.
c)
d)
s , a :I
We amtwasati able to serve this site with adequate water.
Satisfactory arrangements/han
prop -0 1. --ve—Qt been made to serve
(If other than Spokane County)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal.
The applicant has been informed of requirements an. .1: dards.
J'
v. --
.
(Date) (Sign -
Page 4 of 4
aived)
a.4
The
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
NAME:
FILE:
�G 6e
sok\
eve -89
V. CONDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020(7), clarifies that the County
Ordinances must specify ;the; standards and criteria that shall
be applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor.
A. Assuming the proposal is listed as a "permitted" conditional use, do you believe
the proposal meets all of the required established and applicable criteria?
,,,a11-0.)
B. What have you done or could you do to:
1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same
vicinity or zone?
i'01 A.JL .cmc 4- GGj�j
4 l �(.il
' ,
and
2. Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities?
1 9 a
C Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to:
1. The Comprehensive Plan: UAL..) - ...•vi L.L.o
• and
2. Surrounding property: YV\a..,,,.. A
D. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit
and intent (health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Ordinance A N D
mitigate any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties including but
not limited to: 1) time limits; 2) front, side or rear yard greater than
minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing; 5) off-street parking;
and 6) others?
44-1--cto
944.0
r •
Vit/
411(
N.
3 .4.t
-3
seg
i7 2
+f '.
•
r Arsameile-
‹---- •1.4 SALLE ADDfl'il/2
117C4:7, - - —
1
0
3
A
ek4o-c �erk lihk
I lee. cl, b --C(
.66 vr-
r� �7,0 ki
1pi (-k at
c- kei Z6 -